summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/19800-h
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorRoger Frank <rfrank@pglaf.org>2025-10-15 05:05:21 -0700
committerRoger Frank <rfrank@pglaf.org>2025-10-15 05:05:21 -0700
commit02b41bff1116931bc83f380ba566b76395fa8fd4 (patch)
tree8fd9504acdf4c5bdae0701a0eba95483db47cf6a /19800-h
initial commit of ebook 19800HEADmain
Diffstat (limited to '19800-h')
-rw-r--r--19800-h/19800-h.html20989
-rw-r--r--19800-h/images/image01.pngbin0 -> 18523 bytes
-rw-r--r--19800-h/images/image02.pngbin0 -> 17339 bytes
3 files changed, 20989 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/19800-h/19800-h.html b/19800-h/19800-h.html
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..7d6e302
--- /dev/null
+++ b/19800-h/19800-h.html
@@ -0,0 +1,20989 @@
+<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
+<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd">
+<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" lang="en" xml:lang="en"><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" /><meta http-equiv="Content-Style-Type" content="text/css" /><link rel="schema.DC" href="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" /><meta name="DC.Creator" content="Reginald R. Sharpe" /><meta name="DC.Title" content="London and the Kingdom - Volume I" /><meta name="DC.Date" content="November 13, 2006" /><meta name="DC.Language" content="English" /><meta name="DC.Publisher" content="Project Gutenberg" /><meta name="DC.Identifier" content="http://www.gutenberg.org/etext/19800" /><meta name="DC.Rights" content="This text is in the public domain." /><title>The Project Gutenberg EBook of London and the Kingdom - Volume I by Reginald R. Sharpe</title><style type="text/css">/*
+The Gnutenberg Press - default CSS2 stylesheet
+
+Any generated element will have a class "tei" and a class "tei-elem"
+where elem is the element name in TEI.
+The order of statements is important !!!
+*/
+
+.tei { margin: 0; padding: 0;
+ font-size: 100%; font-weight: normal; font-style: normal }
+
+.block { display: block; }
+.inline { display: inline; }
+.floatleft { float: left; margin: 1em 2em 1em 0; }
+.floatright { float: right; margin: 1em 0 1em 2em; }
+.shaded { margin-top: 1em; margin-bottom: 1em;
+ padding: 1em; background-color: #eee; }
+.boxed { margin-top: 1em; margin-bottom: 1em;
+ padding: 1em; border: 1px solid black; }
+
+body.tei { margin: 4ex 10%; text-align: justify }
+div.tei { margin: 2em 0em }
+p.tei { margin: 0em 0em 1em 0em; text-indent: 0em; }
+blockquote.tei { margin: 2em 4em }
+
+div.tei-lg { margin: 1em 0em; }
+div.tei-l { margin: 0em; text-align: left; }
+div.tei-tb { text-align: center; }
+div.tei-epigraph { margin: 0em 0em 1em 10em; }
+div.tei-dateline { margin: 1ex 0em; text-align: right }
+div.tei-salute { margin: 1ex 0em; }
+div.tei-signed { margin: 1ex 0em; text-align: right }
+div.tei-byline { margin: 1ex 0em; }
+
+ /* calculate from size of body = 80% */
+div.tei-marginnote { margin: 0em 0em 0em -12%; width: 11%; float: left; }
+
+div.tei-sp { margin: 1em 0em 1em 2em }
+div.tei-speaker { margin: 0em 0em 1em -2em;
+ font-weight: bold; text-indent: 0em }
+div.tei-stage { margin: 1em 0em; font-weight: normal; font-style: italic }
+span.tei-stage { font-weight: normal; font-style: italic }
+
+div.tei-eg { padding: 1em;
+ color: black; background-color: #eee }
+
+hr.doublepage { margin: 4em 0em; height: 5px; }
+hr.page { margin: 4em 0em; height: 2px; }
+
+ul.tei-index { list-style-type: none }
+
+dl.tei { margin: 1em 0em }
+
+dt.tei-notelabel { font-weight: normal; text-align: right;
+ float: left; width: 3em }
+dd.tei-notetext { margin: 0em 0em 1ex 4em }
+
+span.tei-pb { position: absolute; left: 1%; width: 8%;
+ font-style: normal; }
+
+span.code { font-family: monospace; font-size: 110%; }
+
+ul.tei-castlist { margin: 0em; list-style-type: none }
+li.tei-castitem { margin: 0em; }
+table.tei-castgroup { margin: 0em; }
+ul.tei-castgroup { margin: 0em; list-style-type: none;
+ padding-right: 2em; border-right: solid black 2px; }
+caption.tei-castgroup-head { caption-side: right; width: 50%; text-align: left;
+ vertical-align: middle; padding-left: 2em; }
+*.tei-roledesc { font-style: italic }
+*.tei-set { font-style: italic }
+
+table.rules { border-collapse: collapse; }
+table.rules caption,
+table.rules th,
+table.rules td { border: 1px solid black; }
+
+table.tei { border-collapse: collapse; }
+table.tei-list { width: 100% }
+
+th.tei-head-table { padding: 0.5ex 1em }
+
+th.tei-cell { padding: 0em 1em }
+td.tei-cell { padding: 0em 1em }
+
+td.tei-item { padding: 0; font-weight: normal;
+ vertical-align: top; text-align: left; }
+th.tei-label,
+td.tei-label { width: 3em; padding: 0; font-weight: normal;
+ vertical-align: top; text-align: right; }
+
+th.tei-label-gloss,
+td.tei-label-gloss { text-align: left }
+
+td.tei-item-gloss,
+th.tei-headItem-gloss { padding-left: 4em; }
+
+img.tei-formula { vertical-align: middle; }
+
+</style></head><body class="tei">
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+<div class="tei tei-text" style="margin-bottom: 2.00em; margin-top: 2.00em">
+<div class="tei tei-front" style="margin-bottom: 6.00em; margin-top: 2.00em">
+<div class="tei tei-div" style="margin-bottom: 5.00em; margin-top: 5.00em">
+<div id="pgheader" class="tei tei-div" style="margin-bottom: 4.00em; margin-top: 4.00em"><div class="tei tei-div" style="margin-bottom: 3.00em; margin-top: 3.00em"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 2.00em">The Project Gutenberg EBook of London and the Kingdom - Volume I by Reginald R. Sharpe</p></div><div class="tei tei-div" style="margin-bottom: 3.00em; margin-top: 3.00em"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost
+ and with almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it,
+ give it away or re-use it under the terms of the Project
+ Gutenberg License <a href="#pglicense" class="tei tei-ref">included with this
+ eBook</a> or online at <a href="http://www.gutenberg.org/license" class="tei tei-xref">http://www.gutenberg.org/license</a></p></div><pre class="pre tei tei-div" style="margin-bottom: 3.00em; margin-top: 3.00em">Title: London and the Kingdom - Volume I
+
+Author: Reginald R. Sharpe
+
+Release Date: November 13, 2006 [Ebook #19800]
+
+Language: English
+
+Character set encoding: UTF-8
+
+
+***START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK LONDON AND THE KINGDOM - VOLUME I***
+</pre></div>
+</div>
+
+<hr class="doublepage" /><div class="tei tei-div" style="margin-bottom: 5.00em; margin-top: 5.00em">
+<a name="fig1" id="fig1"></a><div class="tei tei-figure" style="text-align: center"><img src="images/image01.png" width="640" height="229" alt="Illustration: CHARTER OF WILLIAM I TO THE CITIZENS OF LONDON." title="CHARTER OF WILLIAM I TO THE CITIZENS OF LONDON." /><div class="tei tei-head" style="text-align: center; margin-bottom: 1.00em; margin-top: 1.00em">CHARTER OF WILLIAM I TO THE CITIZENS OF LONDON.</div></div>
+
+<a name="fig2" id="fig2"></a><div class="tei tei-figure" style="text-align: center"><img src="images/image02.png" width="640" height="213" alt="Illustration: CHARTER OF WILLIAM I GRANTING LANDS TO DEORMAN." title="CHARTER OF WILLIAM I GRANTING LANDS TO DEORMAN." /><div class="tei tei-head" style="text-align: center; margin-bottom: 1.00em; margin-top: 1.00em">CHARTER OF WILLIAM I GRANTING LANDS TO DEORMAN.</div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"></p>
+</div>
+
+<hr class="doublepage" /><div class="tei tei-titlePage">
+ <span class="tei tei-docTitle"><span class="tei tei-titlePart"><span style="font-size: 144%">London and the Kingdom</span></span><br /><br />
+ <span class="tei tei-titlePart">A HISTORY—DERIVED MAINLY FROM THE ARCHIVES AT GUILDHALL IN THE CUSTODY OF THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF LONDON.</span></span>
+ <div class="tei tei-byline"><br /><br />By <span class="tei tei-docAuthor">REGINALD R. SHARPE, D.C.L.,</span><br />
+ RECORDS CLERK IN THE OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK OF THE CITY OF LONDON; EDITOR OF "CALENDAR OF WILLS ENROLLED IN THE COURT OF HUSTING," ETC.<br /><br />
+ IN THREE VOLUMES.<br /><br />
+ VOL. I.<br /><br /></div>
+
+<span class="tei tei-docImprint"><span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">PRINTED BY ORDER OF THE CORPORATION UNDER THE DIRECTION OF THE LIBRARY COMMITTEE.</span></span>
+<br /><br />London<br />
+LONGMANS, GREEN &amp; Co.<br />
+AND NEW YORK: 15 EAST 16TH STREET.<br /><br /></span>
+<span class="tei tei-docDate">1894</span>
+</div>
+
+<hr class="page" /><div class="tei tei-div" style="margin-bottom: 5.00em; margin-top: 5.00em">
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"><span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-variant: small-caps">London:</span><br /><span style="font-variant: small-caps">
+Printed by Blades, East &amp; Blades,</span><br /><span style="font-variant: small-caps">
+23, Abchurch Lane, E.C.</span></span></p>
+</div>
+
+<hr class="doublepage" /><div class="tei tei-div" style="margin-bottom: 5.00em; margin-top: 5.00em">
+<span class="tei tei-pb" id="pageiii">[pg iii]</span><a name="Pgiii" id="Pgiii" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+<a name="toc3" id="toc3"></a>
+<a name="pdf4" id="pdf4"></a>
+<h1 class="tei tei-head" style="text-align: left; margin-bottom: 3.46em; margin-top: 3.46em"><span style="font-size: 173%">PREFACE.</span></h1>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Of the numerous works that have been written
+on London, by which I mean more especially
+the City of London, few have been devoted to an
+adequate, if indeed any, consideration of its political
+importance in the history of the Kingdom. The
+history of the City is so many-sided that writers
+have to be content with the study of some particular
+phase or some special epoch. Thus we have those
+who have concentrated their efforts to evolving
+out of the remote past the municipal organization
+of the City. Their task has been to unfold the
+origin and institution of the Mayoralty and Shrievalty
+of London, the division of the City into wards with
+Aldermen at their head, the development of the
+various trade and craft guilds, and the respective
+powers and duties of the Courts of Aldermen and
+Common Council, and of the Livery of London
+assembled in their Common Hall. Others have
+devoted themselves to the study of the ecclesiastical
+and monastic side of the City's history—its Cathedral,
+its religious houses, and hundred and more parish<span class="tei tei-pb" id="pageiv">[pg iv]</span><a name="Pgiv" id="Pgiv" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+churches, which occupied so large an extent of the
+City's area. The ecclesiastical importance of the City,
+however, is too often ignored. "We are prone,"
+writes Bishop Stubbs, "in examining into the municipal
+and mercantile history of London, to forget
+that it was a very great ecclesiastical centre."
+Others, again, have confined themselves to depicting
+the every-day life of the City burgess, his social condition,
+his commercial pursuits, his amusements; whilst
+others have been content to perpetuate the memory
+of streets and houses long since lost to the eye,
+and thus to keep alive an interest in scenes and
+places which otherwise would be forgotten.</p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The political aspect of the City's history has
+rarely been touched by writers, and yet its geographical
+position combined with the innate courage
+and enterprise of its citizens served to give it no
+small political power and no insignificant place in
+the history of the Kingdom. This being the case,
+the Corporation resolved to fill the void, and in
+view of the year 1889 being the 700th Anniversary
+of the Mayoralty of London—according to popular
+tradition—instructed the Library Committee to prepare
+a work showing "the pre-eminent position
+occupied by the City of London and the important
+function it exercised in the shaping and making of
+England."</p>
+
+<span class="tei tei-pb" id="pagev">[pg v]</span><a name="Pgv" id="Pgv" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">It is in accordance with these instructions that
+this and succeeding volumes have been compiled.
+As the title of the work has been taken from a
+chapter in Mr. Loftie's book on London ("Historic
+Towns" series, chap. ix), so its main features are
+delineated in that chapter. "It would be interesting"—writes
+Mr. Loftie—"to go over all the
+recorded instances in which the City of London
+interfered directly in the affairs of the Kingdom.
+Such a survey would be the history of England
+as seen from the windows of the Guildhall." No
+words could better describe the character of the
+work now submitted to the public. It has been
+compiled mainly from the City's own archives.
+The City has been allowed to tell its own story.
+If, therefore, its pages should appear to be too
+much taken up with accounts of loans advanced
+by the City to impecunious monarchs or with
+wearisome repetition of calls for troops to be raised
+in the City for foreign service, it is because the
+City's records of the day are chiefly if not wholly
+concerned with these matters. If, on the other
+hand, an event which may be rightly deemed of
+national importance be here omitted, it is because
+the citizens were little affected thereby, and the
+City's records are almost, if not altogether, silent on
+the subject.</p>
+
+<span class="tei tei-pb" id="pagevi">[pg vi]</span><a name="Pgvi" id="Pgvi" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The work does not affect to be a critical history
+so much as a <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">chronique pour servir</span></span>, to which the
+historical student may have recourse in order to learn
+what was the attitude taken up by the citizens of
+London at important crises in the nation's history.
+He will there see how, in the contest between
+Stephen and the Empress Matilda, the City of
+London held as it were the balance; how it helped
+to overthrow the tyranny of Longchamp, and to
+wrest from the reluctant John the Great Charter of
+our liberties; how it was with men and money
+supplied by the City that Edward III and Henry V
+were enabled to conquer France, and how in after
+years the London trained bands raised the siege of
+Gloucester and turned the tide of the Civil War in
+favour of Parliament. He will not fail to note the
+significant fact that before Monk put into execution
+his plan for restoring Charles II to the Crown, the
+taciturn general—little given to opening his mind to
+anyone—deemed it advisable to take up his abode
+in the City in order to first test the feelings of the
+inhabitants as to whether the Restoration would be
+acceptable to them or not. He will see that the
+citizens of London have at times been bold of speech
+even in the presence of their sovereign when the
+cause of justice and the liberty of the subject were at
+stake, and that they did not hesitate to suffer for<span class="tei tei-pb" id="pagevii">[pg vii]</span><a name="Pgvii" id="Pgvii" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+their opinions; that, "at many of the most critical
+periods of our history, the influence of London
+and its Lord Mayors has turned the scale in
+favour of those liberties of which we are so justly
+proud"; and that had the entreaties of the City
+been listened to by the King and his ministers, the
+American Colonies would never have been lost to
+England.</p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">There are two Appendices to the work; one
+comprising copies from the City's Records of letters,
+early proclamations and documents of special interest
+to which reference is made in the text; the other
+consisting of a more complete list of the City's
+representatives in Parliament from the earliest times
+than has yet been printed, supplemented as it has
+been by returns to writs recorded in the City's
+archives and (apparently) no where else. The returns
+for the City in the Blue Books published in
+1878 and 1879 are very imperfect.</p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="text-align: right; margin-bottom: 1.00em">R. R. S.</p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"><span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-variant: small-caps">The Guildhall, London</span></span>,<br />
+<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">April, 1894.</span></span></p>
+</div>
+
+<hr class="doublepage" /><div class="tei tei-div" style="margin-bottom: 5.00em; margin-top: 5.00em">
+<h1 class="tei tei-head" style="text-align: left; margin-bottom: 3.46em; margin-top: 3.46em"><span style="font-size: 173%">Contents</span></h1>
+<ul class="tei tei-index tei-index-toc"><li><a href="#toc3">PREFACE.</a></li><li><a href="#toc5">CHAPTER I.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc7">THE PORT OF LONDON.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc8">THE CITY NOT IN DEMESNE.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc9">THE ROMAN OCCUPATION.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc10">THE SAXONS IN ENGLAND.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc11">THE BISHOP OF LONDON.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc12">THE DANES IN LONDON.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc13">ALFRED "RESTORES" LONDON.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc14">THE FRITH-GILD OF THE CITY.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc15">THE FIRST PAYMENT OF DANEGELT.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc16">LONDON SUBMITS TO SWEYN.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc17">CNUT EXPELLED BY ETHELRED.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc18">THE LAWS OF ETHELRED.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc19">THE "LITHSMEN" OF LONDON.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc20">LONDON THE CAPITAL.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc21">EARL GODWINE AND THE CITIZENS.</a></li><li><a href="#toc22">CHAPTER II.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc24">THE NORMAN CONQUEROR.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc25">LONDON SUBMITS TO WILLIAM.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc26">WILLIAM'S CHARTER TO THE CITY.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc27">THE "DOOMSDAY" BOOK.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc28">THE ELECTION OF HENRY I.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc29">HENRY'S CHARTER TO THE CITY.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc30">THE SHERIFF-WICK OF MIDDLESEX.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc31">LONDON'S ELECTION OF STEPHEN.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc32">THE EMPRESS MATILDA.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc33">LONDON AND THE SYNOD AT WINCHESTER.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc34">THE EMPRESS MATILDA IN LONDON.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc35">LONDON HOLDS THE BALANCE.</a></li><li><a href="#toc36">CHAPTER III.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc38">FITZ-STEPHEN'S DESCRIPTION OF LONDON</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc39">CHARTER OF HENRY II TO THE CITY.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc40">THE REVOLT OF THE BARONS</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc41">RICHARD I AND HIS CHANCELLOR.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc42">THE CITY AND ITS "COMMUNE."</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc43">SUBSTITUTION OF MAYOR FOR PORT-REEVE.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc44">CHRONICLE OF ARNALD FITZ-THEDMAR.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc45">THE CITY'S CLAIM AT CORONATION BANQUETS.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc46">INSURRECTION UNDER LONGBEARD.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc47">THE GOLDEN BULL.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc48">FITZ-WALTER THE CITY'S CASTELLAIN.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc49">LONDON AND THE GREAT CHARTER.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc50">DEATH OF KING JOHN.</a></li><li><a href="#toc51">CHAPTER IV.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc53">THE TREATY OF LAMBETH.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc54">TUMULT RAISED BY CONSTANTINE.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc55">THE KINGDOM OVER-RUN BY FOREIGNERS.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc56">TAKEN INTO THE KING'S HAND.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc57">LONDON SUPPORTS THE BARONS.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc58">THE CITY AT THE MERCY OF THE KING.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc59">ORGANIZATION OF CRAFT GUILDS.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc60">THE MISE OF AMIENS.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc61">SIMON DE MONTFORT'S PARLIAMENT.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc62">THE BATTLE OF EVESHAM AND ITS RESULTS.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc63">THE FATE OF FITZ-THOMAS, MAYOR.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc64">THE MAYORALTY RESTORED.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc65">WALTER HERVY RE-ELECTED MAYOR.</a></li><li><a href="#toc66">CHAPTER V.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc68">FITZ-THEDMAR'S PREJUDICE AGAINST HERVY.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc69">CHARGES AGAINST WALTER HERVY.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc70">THE RESULTS OF HERVY'S POLICY.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc71">INTERRUPTION OF TRADE WITH FLANDERS.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc72">FLEMINGS EXPELLED FROM ENGLAND.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc73">ARRIVAL OF EDWARD I IN ENGLAND.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc74">THE MURDER OF LAURENCE DUKET.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc75">THE ITER AT THE TOWER.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc76">THE EXPULSION OF THE JEWS.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc77">DEATH OF QUEEN ELEANOR.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc78">THE KING IN DIFFICULTIES.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc79">RISING OF THE SCOTS UNDER WALLACE.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc80">DEATH OF EDWARD I.</a></li><li><a href="#toc81">CHAPTER VI.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc83">THE ORDAINERS AND THEIR WORK.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc84">RICHER DE REFHAM, MAYOR.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc85">THE FALL OF GAVESTON.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc86">THE CITIZENS RESIST A TALLIAGE.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc87">DISSENSION IN THE CITY.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc88">PROCEEDINGS AT THE ITER OF 1321.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc89">CLAIMS PUT FORWARD BY THE CITY.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc90">CONTINUATION OF THE ITER.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc91">HAMO DE CHIGWELL, MAYOR.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc92">MILITARY SERVICE OF LONDONERS.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc93">ESCAPE OF MORTIMER FROM THE TOWER.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc94">THE CITY LOST TO EDWARD II.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc95">MURDER OF BISHOP STAPLETON.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc96">DEATH OF THE KING.</a></li><li><a href="#toc97">CHAPTER VII.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc99">THE CITY MARKET MONOPOLY.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc100">THE CORONATION STONE.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc101">JOHN DE GRANTHAM ELECTED MAYOR.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc102">THE KING AND THE EARL OF LANCASTER.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc103">TRIAL OF HAMO DE CHIGWELL.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc104">LONDON MERCHANTS AND THE STAPLES.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc105">A NEW TAX ON WOOL.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc106">RICHARD DE BETOYNE, MAYOR OF THE STAPLE.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc107">BETOYNE'S CONDUCT AT YORK APPROVED.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc108">EXPIRATION OF TREATY OF NORTHAMPTON.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc109">THE KING'S MONOPOLY OF WOOL.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc110">THE CITY PREPARES TO DEFEND ITSELF.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc111">THE BATTLE OF SLUYS.</a></li><li><a href="#toc112">CHAPTER VIII.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc114">THE KING'S UNEXPECTED RETURN, 30 NOV., 1340.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc115">THE CITY'S RIGHT TO VARY CUSTOMS.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc116">EDWARD AGAIN SETS SAIL FOR FRANCE.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc117">SURRENDER OF CALAIS.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc118">THE BLACK DEATH.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc119">THE BATTLE OF POITIERS.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc120">THE PEACE OF BRETIGNY.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc121">RENEWAL OF THE WAR WITH FRANCE.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc122">ASSESSMENT ON CITY PARISHES.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc123">PROCEEDINGS OF THE GOOD PARLIAMENT.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc124">THE COMMON COUNCIL CHOSEN FROM THE GUILDS.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc125">THE CITY AND THE DUKE OF LANCASTER.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc126">THE MAYOR AND ALDERMEN REMOVED.</a></li><li><a href="#toc127">CHAPTER IX.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc129">RICHARD THE "LONDONERS' KING."</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc130">JOHN PHILIPOT.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc131">A CITY LOAN OF £5,000.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc132">THE POLL-TAX AND PEASANTS' REVOLT.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc133">REFORMS UNDER JOHN DE NORTHAMPTON.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc134">NICHOLAS EXTON, ALDERMAN, DEPOSED.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc135">PROCEEDINGS AGAINST JOHN DE NORTHAMPTON.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc136">NORTHAMPTON CONFINED IN TINTAGEL CASTLE.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc137">THE BOOK CALLED "JUBILEE."</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc138">EFFORTS TO OBTAIN NORTHAMPTON'S RELEASE.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc139">DISAFFECTION TOWARDS THE KING.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc140">THE LORDS APPELLANT IN THE CITY.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc141">RE-APPEARANCE OF NORTHAMPTON.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc142">THE CITY REFUSES A LOAN TO RICHARD.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc143">FARRINGDON WARD—WITHIN AND WITHOUT.</a></li><li><a href="#toc144">CHAPTER X.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc146">DOUBTFUL REPORTS AS TO THE LATE KING'S DEATH.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc147">THE STATUTE OF HERESY.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc148">RICHARD WHITTINGTON, MAYOR.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc149">THE MAYOR'S PRECEDENCE IN THE CITY.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc150">BATTLE OF AGINCOURT.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc151">MORE CITY LOANS.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc152">HENRY'S CONQUEST OF NORMANDY.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc153">THE TREATY OF TROVES.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc154">DEATH OF KING HENRY V.</a></li><li><a href="#toc155">CHAPTER XI.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc157">RIVAL CLAIMS OF BEDFORD AND GLOUCESTER.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc158">RELIEF OF ORLEANS.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc159">CORONATION OF HENRY VI.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc160">THE KING'S RETURN FROM FRANCE.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc161">CALAIS APPEALS TO LONDON.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc162">THE PENANCE OF ELEANOR COBHAM.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc163">CAPTURE AND DEATH OF CADE.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc164">RIVALRY BETWEEN YORK ANS SOMERSET.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc165">THE DUKE OF YORK NOMINATED PROTECTOR.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc166">A GENERAL RECONCILIATION AT ST. PAUL'S.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc167">COMMISSIONS OF ARRAY.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc168">THE CITY AND THE YORKISTS.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc169">THE DUKE OF YORK CLAIMS THE CROWN.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc170">LONDON FORSAKEN BY HENRY.</a></li><li><a href="#toc171">CHAPTER XII.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc173">CHARTERS OF EDWARD IV TO THE CITY.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc174">RENEWAL OF THE CIVIL WAR.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc175">HENRY VI RESTORED TO THE CROWN.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc176">THE "BASTARD" FAUCONBERG.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc177">RESTORATION OF EDWARD IV.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc178">ACCESSION OF EDWARD V.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc179">THE CITY AND THE DUKE OF GLOUCESTER.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc180">CORONATION OF RICHARD III.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc181">BOLD SPEECH OF THE CITIZENS.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc182">VISIT OF HENRY VII TO THE CITY.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc183">THE PERKIN WARBECK CONSPIRACY.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc184">DEFEAT AND CAPTURE OF WARBECK.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc185">THE MARRIAGE OF PRINCE ARTHUR.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc186">THE CITY'S CONTROL OVER THE COMPANIES.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc187">MARRIAGE OF THE PRINCESS MARY.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc188">LAST DAYS OF HENRY VII.</a></li><li><a href="#toc189">CHAPTER XIII.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc191">PROCEEDINGS AGAINST EMPSON AND DUDLEY.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc192">CORONATION OF HENRY VIII.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc193">SOLDIERS FURNISHED BY THE CITY.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc194">EDUCATION IN THE CITY.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc195">DEAN COLLET AND ST. PAUL'S SCHOOL.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc196">PROVINCIAL SCHOOLS FOUNDED BY CITIZENS.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc197">THE CITY BEFORE THE STAR CHAMBER.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc198">EVIL—MAY-DAY.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc199">THE CITY OBTAINS THE KING'S PARDON.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc200">AN EPIDEMIC IN THE CITY.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc201">RECEPTION OF CARDINAL CAMPEGGIO.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc202">THE EMPEROR CHARLES VISITS THE CITY.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc203">TRIAL AND EXECUTION OF BUCKINGHAM.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc204">LIVERY COMPANIES TO SURRENDER THEIR PLATE.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc205">PARLIAMENT THREATENED BY WOLSEY.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc206">LONDON AND THE KINGDOM.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc207">DIPLOMATIC INTRIGUE.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc208">THE AMICABLE LOAN.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc209">A TRUCE WITH FRANCE.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc210">PAUL WYTHYPOL, MERCHANT-TAILOR.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc211">THE FALL OF WOLSEY.</a></li><li><a href="#toc212">CHAPTER XIV.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc214">THE HOUSE OF COMMONS AND THE CLERGY.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc215">TITHES PAYABLE IN THE CITY.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc216">THE CITY AND THE GREAT BEAM.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc217">ANNE BOLEYN AND THE CITY.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc218">THE COMMISSIONERS AND THE CHARTERHOUSE.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc219">EXECUTION OF FISHER AND MORE.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc220">THE PILGRIMAGE OF GRACE.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc221">JANE SEYMOUR—ANNE OF CLEVES.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc222">THE DISSOLUTION OF RELIGIOUS HOUSES.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc223">RELIGIOUS HOUSES FOSTERED BY THE CITY.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc224">INSTITUTION OF PARISH REGISTERS.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc225">THE CITY AND THE DISSOLVED HOUSES.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc226">PRECAUTIONS AGAINST INFECTIOUS DISEASES.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc227">RENEWAL OF WAR WITH FRANCE.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc228">A BENEVOLENCE RAISED IN THE CITY.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc229">MORE LEVIES TO BE RAISED IN THE CITY.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc230">ENFORCEMENT OF UNIFORMITY.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc231">THE CITY AS GOVERNORS OF ROYAL HOSPITALS.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc232">FUNERAL OF HENRY THE EIGHTH.</a></li><li><a href="#toc233">CHAPTER XV.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc235">THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VI.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc236">THE REFORMATION.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc237">SUPERSTITIOUS USES.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc238">SPOLIATION OF THE CHURCHES.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc239">THE TUNING OF THE PULPITS.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc240">CRANMER AT ST. PAUL'S.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc241">KETS REBELLION.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc242">THE CITY OPPOSED TO THE PROTECTOR.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc243">THE PROTECTOR LODGED IN THE TOWER.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc244">THE KING ENTERTAINED BY SHERIFF YORK.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc245">THE BOROUGH OF SOUTHWARK.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc246">THE WARD OF BRIDGE WITHOUT.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc247">UNPOPULARITY OF WARWICK.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc248">THE FALL OF SOMERSET.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc249">THE CITY AND THE ROYAL HOSPITALS.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc250">ALDERMAN DOBBS AND CHRIST'S HOSPITAL.</a></li><li><a href="#toc251">CHAPTER XVI.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc253">NORTHUMBERLAND'S CONSPIRACY, 1553.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc254">MARY PROCLAIMED QUEEN IN THE CITY.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc255">THE MASS RESTORED.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc256">CORONATION OF QUEEN MARY.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc257">WYATT'S REBELLION.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc258">QUEEN MARY AT THE GUILDHALL.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc259">SUPPRESSION OF THE REBELLION.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc260">MEN AND MONEY DEMANDED OF THE CITY.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc261">THE QUEEN'S MARRIAGE.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc262">RECONCILIATION WITH THE POPE.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc263">THE MARIAN PERSECUTION.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc264">FOREIGNERS IN THE CITY.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc265">DECLARATION OF WAR WITH FRANCE.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc266">SOLDIERS FURNISHED BY THE CITY.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc267">THE LOSS OF CALAIS.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc268">DEATH OF MARY.</a></li><li><a href="#toc269">CHAPTER XVII.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc271">CORONATION OF QUEEN ELIZABETH.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc272">RESTORATION OF THE PRAYER BOOK.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc273">THE WAR WITH FRANCE.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc274">THE LOSS OF HAVRE OR NEWHAVEN.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc275">THE RESTORATION OF ST. PAUL'S.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc276">THE INCEPTION OF THE ROYAL EXCHANGE.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc277">SIR THOMAS GRESHAM.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc278">THE ROYAL EXCHANGE COMPLETED.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc279">INSURANCE BUSINESS AT ROYAL EXCHANGE.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc280">GRESHAM COLLEGE.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc281">THE CITY FLOODED WIH POLITICAL REFUGEES.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc282">THE FIRST PUBLIC LOTTERY.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc283">SEIZURE OF SPANISH VESSELS.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc284">THE DUKE OF ALVA'S ENVOY IN THE CITY.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc285">MEASURES OF RETALIATION AGAINST SPAIN.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc286">THE RISING IN THE NORTH.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc287">THE BATTLE OF LEPANTO.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc288">FURTHER CALLS FOR MONEY AND MEN.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc289">COUNT CASIMIR ENTERTAINED BY GRESHAM.</a></li><li><a href="#toc290">CHAPTER XVIII.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc292">PREPARATIONS FOR WAR.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc293">JESUITS IN THE CITY.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc294">SPECIAL PREACHERS FOR THE CITY.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc295">PREPARATIONS FOR WAR.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc296">THE FALL OF ANTWERP.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc297">THE BABINGTON CONSPIRACY.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc298">PREPARATIONS TO MEET THE ARMADA.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc299">THE ADVENT OF THE ARMADA.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc300">RICHARD TOMSON AND HIS EXPLOIT.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc301">THANKSGIVING SERVICE AT ST. PAUL'S.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc302">THE CAMP AT TILBURY.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc303">THE CITY AND DISBANDED SOLDIERS.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc304">THE CITY AND THE EARL OF ESSEX.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc305">PRIVATEERING AGAINST SPAIN.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc306">ALDERMAN SIR JOHN SPENCER.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc307">THE CAPTURE OF CADIZ.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc308">THE CITY REFUSES FURTHER SUPPLIES.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc309">THE TYRONE REBELLION.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc310">INSURRECTION OF EARL OF ESSEX.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc311">MOUNTJOY IN IRELAND.</a></li><li style="margin-left: 2em"><a href="#toc312">THE LAST DAYS OF ELIZABETH.</a></li></ul>
+</div>
+
+</div>
+
+<div class="tei tei-body" style="margin-bottom: 6.00em; margin-top: 6.00em">
+<hr class="doublepage" /><div class="tei tei-div" style="margin-bottom: 5.00em; margin-top: 5.00em">
+<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page001">[pg 001]</span><a name="Pg001" id="Pg001" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+<a name="toc5" id="toc5"></a>
+<a name="pdf6" id="pdf6"></a>
+<h1 class="tei tei-head" style="text-align: left; margin-bottom: 3.46em; margin-top: 3.46em"><span style="font-size: 173%">CHAPTER I.</span></h1>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-div" style="margin-bottom: 4.00em; margin-top: 4.00em">
+<a name="toc7" id="toc7"></a><h2 class="tei tei-head" style="text-align: left; margin-bottom: 2.88em; margin-top: 2.88em"></h2>
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The greatness of London. How far due to its geographical position.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The wealth and importance of the City of London
+are due to a variety of causes, of which its geographical
+position must certainly be esteemed not the least.
+The value of such a noble river as the Thames was
+scarcely over-estimated by the citizens when, as the
+story goes, they expressed to King James their comparative
+indifference to his threatened removal of
+himself, his court and parliament, from London, if
+only their river remained to them. The mouth of the
+Thames is the most convenient port on the westernmost
+boundary of the European seaboard, and ships
+would often run in to replenish their tanks with the
+sweet water for which it was once famous.<a id="noteref_1" name="noteref_1" href="#note_1"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1</span></span></a></p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">After the fall of the Western Empire (<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-variant: small-caps">A.D.</span></span> 476),
+commercial enterprise sprang up among the free towns
+of Italy. The carrying trade of the world's merchandise
+became centred for a time in Venice, and
+that town led the way in spreading the principles of
+commerce along the shores of the Mediterranean,
+being closely followed by Genoa, Florence, and Pisa.
+The tide, which then set westward, and continued its
+course beyond the Pillars of Hercules, was met in
+later years by another stream of commerce from the<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page002">[pg 002]</span><a name="Pg002" id="Pg002" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+shores of the Baltic.<a id="noteref_2" name="noteref_2" href="#note_2"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">2</span></span></a> Small wonder, then, if the City
+of London was quick to profit by the continuous
+stream of traffic passing and repassing its very door,
+and vindicated its title to be called—as the Venerable
+Bede had in very early days called it the Emporium
+of the World.<a id="noteref_3" name="noteref_3" href="#note_3"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">3</span></span></a></p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">But if London's prosperity were solely due to its
+geographical position, we should look for the same unrivalled
+pre-eminence in commerce in towns like
+Liverpool or Bristol, which possess similar local
+advantages; whilst, if royal favour or court gaieties
+could make cities great, we should have surely
+expected Winchester, Warwick, York, or Stafford
+to have outstripped London in political and commercial
+greatness, for these were the residences of
+the rulers of Mercia, Northumbria, and Wessex, and
+the scenes of witena-gemóts long before London
+could boast of similar favours. Yet none of these
+equals London in extent, population, wealth, or
+political importance.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The tenure of the City of London compared with other boroughs.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">We must therefore look for other causes of
+London's pre-eminence, and among these, we may
+reckon the fact that the City has never been subject
+to any over-lord except the king. It never formed a
+portion of the king's demesne (<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">dominium</span></span>), but has
+ever been held by its burgesses as tenants <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">in capite</span></span> by
+burgage (free socage) tenure. Other towns like<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page003">[pg 003]</span><a name="Pg003" id="Pg003" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc8" id="toc8"></a>
+Bristol, Plymouth, Beverley, or Durham, were subject
+to over-lords, ecclesiastical or lay, in the person of
+archbishop, bishop, abbot, baron or peer of the
+realm, who kept in their own hands many of the
+privileges which in the more favoured City of London
+were enjoyed by the municipal authorities.</p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">In the early part of the twelfth century, the town
+of Leicester, for instance, was divided into four parts,
+one of which was in the king's demesne, whilst the
+rest were held by three distinct over-lords. In course
+of time, the whole of the shares fell into the hands of
+Count Robert of Meulan, who left the town in
+demesne to the Earls of Leicester and his descendants;
+and to this day the borough bears on its shield the
+arms of the Bellomonts.<a id="noteref_4" name="noteref_4" href="#note_4"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">4</span></span></a> The town of Birmingham is
+said, in like manner, to bear the arms of the barons
+of that name; the town of Cardiff, those of the De
+Clares; and Manchester, those of the Byrons.
+Instances might be multiplied. But the arms of
+the City of London and of free boroughs, like
+Winchester, Oxford, and Exeter, are referable to no
+over-lord, although the borough of Southwark still
+bears traces in its heraldic shield of its former
+ecclesiastical connection.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The powers of an over-lord.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The influence of an over-lord for good or evil,
+over those subject to his authority, was immense.
+Take for instance, Sheffield, which was subject, in the
+reign of Elizabeth, to the Earl of Shrewsbury. The
+cutlery trade, even in those days, was the main-stay of
+the town, and yet the earl could make and unmake
+the rules and ordinances which governed the Cutlers'<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page004">[pg 004]</span><a name="Pg004" id="Pg004" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+Company, and could claim one half of the fines imposed
+on its members.<a id="noteref_5" name="noteref_5" href="#note_5"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">5</span></span></a></p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">When, during the reign of Charles II, nearly
+every municipal borough in the kingdom was forced
+to surrender its charter to the king, the citizens of
+Durham surrendered theirs to the Bishop, who, to
+the intense horror of a contemporary writer, reserved
+to himself and his successors in the See the power
+of approving and confirming the mayor, aldermen,
+recorder, and common council of that city.<a id="noteref_6" name="noteref_6" href="#note_6"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">6</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">London under the Roman Empire.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The commercial greatness of London can be
+traced back to the time of the Roman occupation of
+Britain. From being little more than a stockaded fort,
+situate at a point on the river's bank which admitted
+of an easy passage by ferry across to Southwark, London
+prospered under the protection afforded to its
+traders by the presence of the Roman legions, but it
+never in those days became the capital of the province.
+Although a flourishing centre of commerce in the middle
+of the first century of the Christian era, it was not
+deemed of sufficient importance by Suetonius, the
+Roman general, to run the risk of defending against
+Boadicea,<a id="noteref_7" name="noteref_7" href="#note_7"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">7</span></span></a> and although thought worthy of the title of
+Augusta—a name bestowed only on towns of exceptional
+standing—the Romans did not hesitate to
+leave both town and province to their fate as soon
+as danger threatened them nearer home.</p>
+
+<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page005">[pg 005]</span><a name="Pg005" id="Pg005" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc9" id="toc9"></a>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Roman highways.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">For military no less than for commercial purposes—and
+the Roman occupation of Britain was
+mainly a military one—good roads were essential, and
+these the Romans excelled in making. It is remarkable
+that in the Itinerary of Antoninus Pius, London
+figures either as the starting point or as the terminus to
+nearly one-half of the routes described in the portion
+relating to Britain.<a id="noteref_8" name="noteref_8" href="#note_8"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">8</span></span></a> The name of one and only one
+of these Roman highways survives in the city at the
+present day, and then only in its Teutonic and not
+Roman form—the Watling or "Wathelinga" Street,
+the street which led from Kent through the city of
+London to Chester and York, and thence by two
+branches to Carlisle and the neighbourhood of Newcastle.
+The Ermin Street, another Roman road with
+a Teutonic name, led from London to Lincoln, with
+branches to Doncaster and York, but its name no
+longer survives in the city.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">London bridge and the city wall.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The same reasons that led the Romans to
+establish good roads throughout the country led
+them also to erect a bridge across the river from
+London to Southwark, and in later years to enclose
+the city with a wall. To the building of the bridge,
+which probably took place in the early years of the
+Roman occupation, London owed much of its youthful
+prosperity; whenever any accident happened to
+the bridge the damage was always promptly repaired.
+Not so with the walls of the city. They were allowed
+to fall into decay until the prudence and military
+genius of the great Alfred caused them to be repaired
+as a bulwark against the onslaughts of the Danes.</p>
+
+<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page006">[pg 006]</span><a name="Pg006" id="Pg006" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The departure of the Roman legions, and its consequences.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">"Britain had been occupied by the Romans, but
+had not become Roman,"<a id="noteref_9" name="noteref_9" href="#note_9"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">9</span></span></a> and the scanty and superficial
+civilization which the Britons had received
+from the Roman occupation was obliterated by
+the calamities which followed the northern invasions
+of the fifth and following centuries. A Christian
+city, as Augusta had probably been, not a vestige of
+a Christian church of the Roman period has come
+down to us.<a id="noteref_10" name="noteref_10" href="#note_10"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">10</span></span></a> It quickly lapsed into paganism.
+Its very name disappears, and with it the names
+of its streets, its traditions and its customs. Its inhabitants
+forgot the Latin tongue, and the memories
+of 400 years were clean wiped out. There remains to
+us of the present day nothing to remind us of London
+under the Roman empire, save a fragment of a wall,
+a milestone, a few coins and statuettes, and some
+articles of personal ornament or domestic use—little
+more in fact, than what may be seen in the Museum
+attached to the Guildhall Library. The long subjection
+to Roman rule had one disastrous effect. It
+enervated the people and left them powerless to cope
+with those enemies who, as soon as the iron hand of
+the Roman legions was removed, came forth from
+their hiding places to harry the land.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Appeal to Rome for aid against the Picts and Scots. </span><span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-size: 80%; font-variant: small-caps">A. D.</span></span><span style="font-size: 80%"> 446.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Thus it was that when the Picts and Scots again
+broke loose from their northern fastnesses and threatened
+London as they had done before (<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-variant: small-caps">A.D.</span></span> 368), they
+once more appealed for aid to the Roman emperor, by
+whose assistance the marauders had formerly been
+driven back. But times were different in 446 to<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page007">[pg 007]</span><a name="Pg007" id="Pg007" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc10" id="toc10"></a>
+what they had been in 368. The Roman empire
+was itself threatened with an invasion of the Goths,
+and the emperor had his hands too full to allow him
+to lend a favourable ear to the "groans of the
+Britons."<a id="noteref_11" name="noteref_11" href="#note_11"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">11</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Meeting with refusal, the Britons call in the Saxons.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Compelled to seek assistance elsewhere, the
+Britons invited a tribe of warriors, ever ready to let
+their services for hire, from the North Sea, to lend
+them their aid. The foreigners came in answer to
+the invitation, they saw, they conquered; and then
+they refused to leave an island the fertility of which
+they appreciated no less than they despised the
+slothfulness of its inhabitants.<a id="noteref_12" name="noteref_12" href="#note_12"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">12</span></span></a> They turned their
+weapons against their employers, and utterly routed
+them at Crayford, driving them to take refuge within
+the walls of London.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The battle of the "Creegan Ford." </span><span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-size: 80%; font-variant: small-caps">A.D.</span></span><span style="font-size: 80%"> 457.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">"<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-variant: small-caps">A.D.</span></span> 457 (456). This year Hengist and Æsc
+[Eric or Ash] his son fought against the Britons at
+a place called Creegan-Ford [Crayford] and there
+slew four thousand men, and the Britons then forsook
+Kent, and in great terror fled to London."<a id="noteref_13" name="noteref_13" href="#note_13"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">13</span></span></a>
+So runs the Anglo-Saxon chronicle, and this is the
+sole piece of information concerning London it vouchsafes
+us for one hundred and fifty years following
+the departure of the Romans. The information,<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page008">[pg 008]</span><a name="Pg008" id="Pg008" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+scant as it is, serves to show that London had not
+quite become a deserted city, nor had yet been devastated
+as others had been by the enemy. Its
+walls still served to afford shelter to the terrified
+refugees.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">London, the metropolis of the East Saxons.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">When next we read of her, she is in the possession
+of the East Saxons. How they came there is a matter
+for conjecture. It is possible that with the whole of
+the surrounding counties in the hands of the enemy,
+the Londoners were driven from their city to seek
+means of subsistence elsewhere, and that when the
+East Saxons took possession of it, they found houses
+and streets deserted. Little relishing a life within a
+town, they probably did not make a long stay, and, on
+their departure, the former inhabitants returned and
+the city slowly recovered its wonted appearance,
+as the country around became more settled.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Mellitus, the first Bishop of London, </span><span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-size: 80%; font-variant: small-caps">A.D.</span></span><span style="font-size: 80%"> 604.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Christianity in the country had revived, and London
+was now to receive its first bishop. It is the year
+604. "This year," writes the chronicler, "Augustine
+hallowed two bishops, Mellitus and Justus; Mellitus
+he sent to preach baptism to the East Saxons, whose
+king was called Seberht, son of Ricula, the sister of
+Ethelbert whom Ethelbert had there set as king.
+And Ethelbert gave to Mellitus a bishop's see at
+London." This passage is remarkable for two
+reasons:—(1) as shewing us that London was at this
+time situate in Essex, the kingdom of the East Saxons,
+and (2) that Seberht was but a <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">roi fainéant</span></span>, enjoying
+no real independence in spite of his dignity as ruler of
+the East Saxons and nominal master of London, his
+uncle Ethelbert, king of the Cantii, exercising a hegemony<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page009">[pg 009]</span><a name="Pg009" id="Pg009" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc11" id="toc11"></a>
+over "all the nations of the English as far as
+the Humber." <a id="noteref_14" name="noteref_14" href="#note_14"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">14</span></span></a></p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Hence it is that London is spoken of by some as
+being the <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">metropolis</span></span> of the East Saxons,<a id="noteref_15" name="noteref_15" href="#note_15"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">15</span></span></a> and by
+others as being the principal city of the Cantii;<a id="noteref_16" name="noteref_16" href="#note_16"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">16</span></span></a> the
+fact being that, though locally situate in Essex, it was
+deemed the political capital of that kingdom which
+for the time being happened to be paramount.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">St. Paul's Cathedral founded by Ethelbert.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">After the death of Seberht, the Londoners
+became dissatisfied with their bishop and drove him
+out. Mellitus became in course of time Archbishop
+of Canterbury, whilst the Londoners again relapsed
+into paganism.<a id="noteref_17" name="noteref_17" href="#note_17"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">17</span></span></a> Not only was the erection of a cathedral
+in the city due to Ethelbert, but it was also at
+his instigation, if not with his treasure, that Seberht,
+the "wealthy sub-king of London," was, as is
+believed, induced to found the Abbey of Westminster.<a id="noteref_18" name="noteref_18" href="#note_18"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">18</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The rival Cities of London and Winchester.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">When the Saxon kingdoms became united under
+Egbert and he became <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">rex totius Britanniæ</span></span> (<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-variant: small-caps">A.D.</span></span> 827),<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page010">[pg 010]</span><a name="Pg010" id="Pg010" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+London began to take a more prominent place among
+the cities of the kingdom, notwithstanding its having
+been three times destroyed by fire between 674 and
+801.<a id="noteref_19" name="noteref_19" href="#note_19"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">19</span></span></a> It became more often the seat of the royal
+residence, and the scene of witena-gemóts; nevertheless
+it was not the seat of government, much less the
+capital. Then and for a long time to come it had a
+formidable rival in Winchester, the chief town of
+Egbert's own kingdom of Wessex. To Winchester
+that king proceeded in triumph after completing the
+union of the Saxon kingdoms, and thither he
+summoned his vassals to hear himself proclaimed
+their overlord. From Winchester, Alfred, too, promulgated
+his new code of Wessex law—a part of the
+famous <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Domboc</span></span>, a copy of which is said to have been
+at one time preserved among the archives of the City
+of London<a id="noteref_20" name="noteref_20" href="#note_20"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">20</span></span></a>—and the Easter gemót, no matter where
+the other gemóts of the year were held, was nearly
+always held at Winchester. When it came to a
+question of trade regulation, then London took
+precedence of Winchester. "Let one measure and
+one weight pass, such as is observed at London and
+at Winchester,"<a id="noteref_21" name="noteref_21" href="#note_21"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">21</span></span></a> enacted King Edgar, whose system
+of legislation was marked with so much success that
+"Edgar's Law" was referred to by posterity as to the
+old constitution of the realm.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">London in the hands of the Danes.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">In the meantime, the country had been invaded
+by a fresh enemy, and the same atrocities which the
+Briton had suffered at the hands of the Saxon, the<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page011">[pg 011]</span><a name="Pg011" id="Pg011" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc12" id="toc12"></a>
+Saxon was made to suffer at the hands of the
+Dane. London suffered with the rest of the
+kingdom. In 839 we read of a "great slaughter"
+there;<a id="noteref_22" name="noteref_22" href="#note_22"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">22</span></span></a> in 851 the city was in the hands of the enemy,
+and continued to remain at the mercy of the Danes,
+so much so, in fact, that in 872 we find the Danish
+army taking up winter quarters within its walls, as in
+a city that was their own.<a id="noteref_23" name="noteref_23" href="#note_23"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">23</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The Treaty of Wedmore, </span><span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-size: 80%; font-variant: small-caps">A.D.</span></span><span style="font-size: 80%"> 878.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">It was now, when the clouds were darkest, that
+Alfred, brother of King Ethelred, appeared on the
+scene, and after more than one signal success by land
+and sea, concluded the treaty of Wedmore (<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-variant: small-caps">A.D.</span></span> 878)<a id="noteref_24" name="noteref_24" href="#note_24"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">24</span></span></a>
+by which a vast tract of land bounded by an imaginary
+line drawn from the Thames along the river Lea to
+Bedford, and thence along the Roman Watling Street
+to the Welsh border, was ceded to the enemy under
+the name of <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Danelagh</span></span>. The treaty, although it
+curtailed the Kingdom of Wessex, and left London
+itself at the mercy of the Danes, was followed by a
+period of comparative tranquillity, which allowed
+Alfred time to make preparations for a fresh struggle
+that was to wrest from the enemy the land they had
+won.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The Danes expelled from London.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The Danes, like the Angles and the Jutes before
+them, set little store by fortifications and walled towns,
+preferring always to defend themselves by combat in
+open field, and the Roman wall of the City was
+allowed to fall still further into decay. In the eyes of<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page012">[pg 012]</span><a name="Pg012" id="Pg012" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+Alfred on the other hand, London, with its surrounding
+wall, was a place of the first importance, and one to
+be acquired and kept at all hazards. At length he
+achieved the object of his ambition and succeeded in
+driving out the Danes, (<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-variant: small-caps">A.D.</span></span> 883 or 884).<a id="noteref_25" name="noteref_25" href="#note_25"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">25</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Alfred "restores" London, 886-887.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Whilst the enemy directed their attention to
+further conquests in France and Belgium, Alfred bent
+his energies towards repairing the City walls and
+building a citadel for his defence—"the germ of that
+tower which was to be first the dwelling place of
+Kings, and then the scene of the martyrdom of their
+victims."<a id="noteref_26" name="noteref_26" href="#note_26"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">26</span></span></a> To his foresight in this respect was it due
+that the city of London was never again taken by
+open assault, but successfully repelled all attacks whilst
+the surrounding country was often devastated.</p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Nor did Alfred confine his attention solely to
+strengthening the city against attacks of enemies
+without or to making it more habitable. He also laid
+the foundation of an internal Government analagous
+to that established in the Shires. Under the year <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-variant: small-caps">A.D.</span></span>
+886, the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle<a id="noteref_27" name="noteref_27" href="#note_27"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">27</span></span></a> records that "King
+Ælfred restored London; and all the Anglo race
+turned to him that were not in bondage of the
+Danish men; and he then committed the burgh to<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page013">[pg 013]</span><a name="Pg013" id="Pg013" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc13" id="toc13"></a>
+"the keeping of the aldorman Æthelred." In course
+of time the analogy between shire and city organization
+became more close. Where the former had its
+Shiremote, the latter had its Folkmote, meeting in St.
+Paul's Churchyard by summons of the great bell.
+The County Court found its co-relative in the Husting
+Court of the City; the Hundred Court in the City
+Wardmote.<a id="noteref_28" name="noteref_28" href="#note_28"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">28</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">An attack of the Danes in the absence of Alfred gallantly repelled by the Citizens, </span><span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-size: 80%; font-variant: small-caps">A.D.</span></span><span style="font-size: 80%"> 894.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">For the next ten years Alfred busied himself
+founding a navy and establishing order in different
+parts of the country, but in 896 he was compelled to
+hasten to London from the west of England to assist
+in the repulse of another attack of the Danes. Two
+years before (894) the Danes had threatened London,
+having established a fortification at Beamfleate or
+South Benfleet, in Essex, whence they harried the
+surrounding country. The Londoners on that occasion
+joined that part of the army which Alfred had left
+behind in an attack upon the fort, which they not only
+succeeded in taking, but they "took all that there was
+within, as well money as women and children, and
+brought all to London; and all the ships they either
+broke in pieces or burned, or brought to London or
+to Rochester."<a id="noteref_29" name="noteref_29" href="#note_29"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">29</span></span></a> Nor was this all: Hasting's wife
+and his two sons had been made prisoners, but were
+chivalrously restored by Alfred.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Successful strategy of Alfred against the Danes, </span><span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-size: 80%; font-variant: small-caps">A.D.</span></span><span style="font-size: 80%"> 896.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The Danes, however, were not to be daunted by
+defeat nor moved from their purpose by the generous
+conduct of Alfred. In 896 they again appeared.
+This time they erected a work on the sea, twenty
+miles above London. Alfred made a reconnaissance<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page014">[pg 014]</span><a name="Pg014" id="Pg014" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+and closed up the river so that they found it impossible
+to bring out their ships.<a id="noteref_30" name="noteref_30" href="#note_30"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">30</span></span></a> They therefore abandoned
+their vessels and escaped across country, and "the men
+of London" writes the chronicler, "brought away the
+ships, and all those which they could not bring off
+they broke up, and those that were <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">stalworth</span></span> they
+brought into London."<a id="noteref_31" name="noteref_31" href="#note_31"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">31</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The London "frith-gild" under Athelstan, 925-940.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The principle of each man becoming responsible
+to the Government for the good behaviour of the
+neighbour, involved in the system of frankpledge
+which Alfred established throughout the whole of his
+kingdom, subject to his rule, was carried a step further
+by the citizens of London at a later date. Under
+Athelstan (<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-variant: small-caps">A.D.</span></span> 925-940) we find them banding
+together and forming an association for mutual defence
+of life and property, and thus assisting the executive
+in the maintenance of law and order. A complete
+code of ordinances, regulating this "frith" or peace
+gild, as it was called, drawn up by the bishops and
+reeves of the burgh, and confirmed by the members
+on oath, is still preserved to us.<a id="noteref_32" name="noteref_32" href="#note_32"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">32</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">First mention of a Guildhall in London.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The enactments are chiefly directed against
+thieves, the measures to be taken to bring them to
+justice, and the penalties to be imposed on them, the
+formation of a common fund for the pursuit of thieves,
+and for making good to members any loss they may
+have sustained. So far, the gild undertook duties of a
+public character, such as are found incorporated among<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page015">[pg 015]</span><a name="Pg015" id="Pg015" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc14" id="toc14"></a>
+other laws of the kingdom, but it had, incidentally,
+also its social and religious side. When the ruling
+members met in their gild-hall,<a id="noteref_33" name="noteref_33" href="#note_33"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">33</span></span></a> which they did once
+a month, "if they could and had leisure," they enjoyed
+a refection with ale-drinking or "byt-filling."</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The "frith-guild," something more than a mere friendly society.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Some writers see in the "frith-gild" of Athelstan's
+day, nothing more than a mere "friendly society,"
+meeting together once a month, to drink their beer
+and consult about matters of mutual insurance and
+other topics of more or less social and religious
+character.<a id="noteref_34" name="noteref_34" href="#note_34"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">34</span></span></a> But there is evidence to show that the
+tie which united members of a "frith-gild" was
+stronger and more solemn than any which binds the
+members of a friendly society or voluntary association.
+The punishment of one who was guilty of breaking
+his "frith" was practically banishment or death.
+Such a one, in Athelstan's time, was ordered to abjure
+the country, which probably meant no more than that
+he was to leave his burgh or perhaps the shire in
+which he dwelt, but if ever he returned, he might be
+treated as a thief taken "hand-habbende" or one
+taken with stolen goods upon him, in other words,
+"with the mainour."<a id="noteref_35" name="noteref_35" href="#note_35"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">35</span></span></a> A thief so taken might lawfully
+be killed by the first man who met him, and the
+slayer was, according to the code of the "frith-gild,"<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page016">[pg 016]</span><a name="Pg016" id="Pg016" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+"to be twelve pence the better for the deed."<a id="noteref_36" name="noteref_36" href="#note_36"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">36</span></span></a>
+Under these circumstances, it is more reasonable to
+suppose, that the "frith-gild" was not so much a
+voluntary association as one imposed upon members
+of the community by some public authority.<a id="noteref_37" name="noteref_37" href="#note_37"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">37</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Encouragement given to London merchants.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The commercial supremacy of London, not only
+over Winchester but over every other town in the
+kingdom, now becomes more distinct, for when Athelstan
+appointed moneyers or minters throughout the
+country, he assigned eight (the largest number of
+all) to London, whilst for Winchester he appointed
+only six, other towns being provided with but one or
+at most two.<a id="noteref_38" name="noteref_38" href="#note_38"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">38</span></span></a> The king, moreover, showed his
+predilection for London by erecting a mansion house
+for himself within the city's walls.</p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The encouragement which Athelstan gave to
+commercial enterprise by enacting, that any merchant
+who undertook successfully three voyages across the
+high seas at his own cost (if not in his own vessel)
+should rank as a thane,<a id="noteref_39" name="noteref_39" href="#note_39"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">39</span></span></a> must have affected the London
+burgess more than those of any other town.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Return of the Danes </span><span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-size: 80%; font-style: italic">temp.</span></span><span style="font-size: 80%"> Ethelred the Unready,
+991-994.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Under Ethelred II, surnamed the "Unready"
+or "redeless" from his indifference to the "rede" or
+council of his advisers, the city would again have<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page017">[pg 017]</span><a name="Pg017" id="Pg017" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc15" id="toc15"></a>
+fallen into the hands of the Danes, but for the personal
+courage displayed by its inhabitants and the
+protection which, by Alfred's foresight, the walls were
+able to afford them. In 994, Olaf and Sweyn sailed
+up the Thames with a large fleet and threatened to
+burn London. Obstinate fighting took place, but the
+enemy, we are told, "sustained more harm and evil
+than they ever deemed that any townsman could do
+to them, for the Holy Mother of God, on that day,
+manifested her mercy to the townsmen and delivered
+them from their foes."<a id="noteref_40" name="noteref_40" href="#note_40"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">40</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The first payment of Danegelt, 991.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Matters might not have been so bad had not the
+king already committed the fatal error of attempting
+to secure peace by buying off the enemy. In 991, he
+had, with the consent of his witan, raised the sum of
+£10,000 with which he had bribed the Danish host.
+This was the origin of the tax known as Danegelt,
+which in after years became one of the chief financial
+resources of the Crown and continued almost uninterruptedly
+down to the reign of Henry II. The effect
+of the bribe was naturally enough to induce the
+enemy to make further depredations whenever in
+want of money; and accordingly, a Danish fleet
+threatened London the very next year (992) and
+again in 994. On this last occasion, the same wretched
+expedient was resorted to, and the Danes were again
+bought off.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The massacre of Danes 13th Nov., 1002.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Nor was cowardice the only charge of which
+Ethelred was guilty. To this must be added treachery
+and murder. In the year 1002, when he married the
+daughter of the Duke of Normandy, hoping thereby<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page018">[pg 018]</span><a name="Pg018" id="Pg018" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+to win the Duke's friendship and to close the harbours
+on the French coast against Sweyn, Ethelred issued
+secret orders for a massacre of all Danes found in
+England. In this massacre, which took place on the
+Festival of St. Brice (13th Nov.), perished Gunhild,
+sister of Sweyn. Under these circumstances, it can
+scarcely be wondered at, that thenceforth the Danish
+invasions became more frequent, more systematic, and
+more extensive than ever.</p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">For four years they continued their depredations
+"cruelly marking every shire in Wessex with burning
+and with harrying." Then they were again bought
+off with a sum of £36,000, and two years' respite
+(1007-8) was gained.<a id="noteref_41" name="noteref_41" href="#note_41"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">41</span></span></a> It was a respite and no more.
+As soon as they had spent their money, they came
+again, and in 1009 made several assaults on
+London—"They often fought against the town of
+London, but to God be praise that it yet stands
+sound, and they have ever fared ill."<a id="noteref_42" name="noteref_42" href="#note_42"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">42</span></span></a> Every year
+they struck deeper into the heart of the country, and
+carried their plundering expeditions from Wessex into
+Mercia and East Anglia.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The murder of Abp. Alphage, 1012.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">In 1011 Canterbury was taken and sacked,
+Alphage, the Archbishop, being made prisoner, and
+carried away by the Danish fleet to Greenwich.
+Finding it impossible to extort a ransom, they brutally
+murdered him (19th May, 1012), in one of their
+drunken moods, pelting him in their open court or
+"husting" with bones and skulls of oxen.<a id="noteref_43" name="noteref_43" href="#note_43"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">43</span></span></a> The worthy
+prelate's corpse was allowed to be removed to London<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page019">[pg 019]</span><a name="Pg019" id="Pg019" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc16" id="toc16"></a>
+where it was reverently interred in St. Paul's. A few
+years later, Cnut caused it to be transferred with due
+solemnity to the Archbishop's own metropolitan
+church of Canterbury.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Sweyn again attacks London, </span><span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-size: 80%; font-variant: small-caps">A.D.</span></span><span style="font-size: 80%"> 1013.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">In the following year, Sweyn was so successful
+in reducing the Northumbrians and the inhabitants of
+the five boroughs,<a id="noteref_44" name="noteref_44" href="#note_44"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">44</span></span></a> as well as the towns of Winchester
+and Oxford, taking hostages from each as he went,
+that he thought he might venture once more to attack
+London itself; hoping for better success than had
+attended him on previous occasions. He was the
+more anxious to capture London, because Ethelred
+himself was there, but he again met with such
+determined resistance, and so many of his followers
+were drowned in the Thames that for the fourth time
+he had to beat a retreat.<a id="noteref_45" name="noteref_45" href="#note_45"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">45</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">London submits.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Leaving London for a while, Sweyn proceeded to
+conquer that part of England which still held out
+against him, and having accomplished his purpose,
+was again preparing to attack the one city which had
+baffled all his attempts to capture, when the Londoners
+themselves, finding further opposition hopeless, offered
+their submission and left Ethelred to take care of
+himself.<a id="noteref_46" name="noteref_46" href="#note_46"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">46</span></span></a> This he did by betaking himself to
+Normandy, where he remained until Sweyn's death
+in the following year (3rd Feb., 1014).</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Election of Cnut, 1014.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Upon this event taking place, the crews of the
+Danish fleet assumed the right of disposing of the<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page020">[pg 020]</span><a name="Pg020" id="Pg020" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+English crown, and elected Sweyn's son, Cnut, to be
+king. The English, however, compelled as they had
+been by superior strength to submit to the father,
+were in no mood to accept without a struggle the
+sovereignty of his son. The whole of the Witan at
+once declared in favour of sending for Ethelred, with
+the assurance "that no lord was dearer than their
+natural lord," if only he would promise to govern
+them more justly than before.<a id="noteref_47" name="noteref_47" href="#note_47"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">47</span></span></a> Ethelred sent word
+by Edmund his son that "he would be to them a
+kind lord, and amend all the things which they
+eschewed, and all the things should be forgiven
+which had been done or said to him, on condition
+that they all, unanimously and without treachery,
+would turn to him." Pledges were given and taken
+on either side, and thenceforth a Danish king was to
+be looked upon as an outlaw.<a id="noteref_48" name="noteref_48" href="#note_48"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">48</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Ethelred returns to London.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">When Ethelred arrived in England, he was accompanied
+according to an Icelandic Saga,<a id="noteref_49" name="noteref_49" href="#note_49"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">49</span></span></a> by King Olaf,
+of Norway, who assisted him in expelling the Danes
+from Southwark, and gaining an entrance into the
+city. The manner in which this was carried out, is
+thus described. A small knot of Danes occupied a
+stronghold in the City, whilst others were in possession
+of Southwark. Between the two lay London Bridge—a
+wooden bridge, "so broad that two waggons
+could pass each other upon it"—fortified by barricades,
+towers, and parapets, and manned by Danes.
+Ethelred was naturally very anxious to get possession<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page021">[pg 021]</span><a name="Pg021" id="Pg021" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc17" id="toc17"></a>
+of the bridge, and a meeting of chiefs was summoned
+to consult how it could be done. Olaf promised to
+lay his fleet alongside the bridge if the English would
+do the same. This was agreed upon. Having
+covered in the decks of the vessels with a wooden
+roof to protect the crew and fighting men, Olaf succeeded
+in rowing light up to the bridge and laying
+cables round its piers. This done, he caused his ships
+to head down stream and the crews to row their
+hardest. The result was that the piles were loosened
+and the bridge, heavily weighted by the Danes who
+were fighting upon it, gave way. Many were thrown
+into the river, whilst others made good their retreat
+to Southwark, which was soon afterwards stormed
+and taken. This incident in connection with
+Ethelred's return formed the subject of more than
+one Scandinavian poem, of which the following
+may serve as a specimen:—</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-lg" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em; margin-top: 1.00em">
+<div class="tei tei-l" style="text-align: left; margin-left: 2.00em">"London Bridge is broken down—</div>
+<div class="tei tei-l" style="text-align: left; margin-left: 2.00em">Gold is won and bright renown.</div>
+<div class="tei tei-l" style="text-align: left; margin-left: 4.00em"> Shields resounding,</div>
+<div class="tei tei-l" style="text-align: left; margin-left: 4.00em"> War-horns sounding,</div>
+<div class="tei tei-l" style="text-align: left; margin-left: 2.00em">Hildur shouting in the din!</div>
+<div class="tei tei-l" style="text-align: left; margin-left: 4.00em"> Arrows singing,</div>
+<div class="tei tei-l" style="text-align: left; margin-left: 4.00em"> Mail-coats ringing—</div>
+<div class="tei tei-l" style="text-align: left; margin-left: 2.00em">Odin makes our Olaf win!"</div>
+</div>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Drives Cnut out of England.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">For a short while after his return Ethelred displayed
+a spirit of patriotism and courage beyond any
+he had hitherto shown. He succeeded in surprising
+and defeating the Danes in that district of Lincolnshire
+known as Lindsey, and drove Cnut to take
+refuge in his ships, and eventually to sail away to
+Denmark.<a id="noteref_50" name="noteref_50" href="#note_50"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">50</span></span></a></p>
+
+<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page022">[pg 022]</span><a name="Pg022" id="Pg022" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Return of Cnut, </span><span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-size: 80%; font-variant: small-caps">A.D.</span></span><span style="font-size: 80%"> 1015.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">It was not long before he again appeared; he was
+then, however, to meet in the field Ethelred's son,
+Edmund, whose valour had gained for him the name of
+Ironside. This spirited youth, forming a striking contrast
+to the weak and pusillanimous character of his
+father, had collected a force to withstand the enemy,
+but the men refused to fight unless Ethelred came
+with them, and unless they had "the support of the
+citizens of London."<a id="noteref_51" name="noteref_51" href="#note_51"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">51</span></span></a> A message was therefore
+sent to him at London to take the field with such a
+force as he could gather. Father and son thereupon
+joined forces; but the king was in ill-health, and it
+wanted but a whisper of treachery to send him back
+to the security of London's walls. Thither, too,
+marched Cnut, but before he arrived Ethelred had
+died (23rd April, 1016).<a id="noteref_52" name="noteref_52" href="#note_52"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">52</span></span></a> The late king was buried
+in St. Paul's.<a id="noteref_53" name="noteref_53" href="#note_53"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">53</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The laws of Ethelred regulating foreign trade.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The city of London had by this time attained a
+position higher than it had ever reached before.
+"We cannot as yet call it the capital of the kingdom,
+but its geographical position made one of the chief
+bulwarks of the land, and in no part of the realm do
+we find the inhabitants outdoing the patriotism and
+courage of its valiant citizens."<a id="noteref_54" name="noteref_54" href="#note_54"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">54</span></span></a> Under Edgar
+the foreign trade with the city had increased to such
+an extent that Ethelred, his son, deemed it time to
+draw up a code of laws to regulate the customs to be
+paid by the merchants of France and Flanders as well
+as by the "emperor's men," the fore-runners of those
+"easterling" merchants, who, from their headquarters<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page023">[pg 023]</span><a name="Pg023" id="Pg023" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc18" id="toc18"></a>
+in the Steel-yard at Dowgate, subsequently became
+known as merchants of the Steel-yard.<a id="noteref_55" name="noteref_55" href="#note_55"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">55</span></span></a></p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Among the multitude of foreigners that in after-years
+thronged the streets of the city bartering
+pepper and spices from the far east, gloves and
+cloth, vinegar and wine, in exchange for the rural
+products of the country, might be seen the now
+much hated but afterwards much favoured Dane.<a id="noteref_56" name="noteref_56" href="#note_56"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">56</span></span></a>
+The Dane was again master of all England, except
+London, and Ethelred's kingdom, before the close of
+his reign, was confined within the narrow limits of the
+city's walls; "that true-hearted city was once more
+the bulwark of England, the centre of every patriotic
+hope, the special object of every hostile attack."<a id="noteref_57" name="noteref_57" href="#note_57"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">57</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Election of Edmund Ironside by the Londoners, 1016.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">At Ethelred's death the Witan who were in
+London united with the inhabitants of the city in
+choosing Edmund as his successor. This is the first
+recorded instance of the Londoners having taken a
+direct part in the election of a king. Cnut disputed
+Edmund's right to the crown, and proceeded to attack
+the city. He sailed up the Thames with his fleet,
+but being unable to pass the bridge, he dug a canal
+on the south side of the river, whereby he was
+enabled to carry his ships above bridge, and so invest
+the city along the whole length of the riverside. To
+complete the investment, and so prevent any of the
+inhabitants escaping either by land or water, he<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page024">[pg 024]</span><a name="Pg024" id="Pg024" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+ditched the city round, so that none could pass in
+or out.<a id="noteref_58" name="noteref_58" href="#note_58"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">58</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Cnut's attempts on London frustrated.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">This, as well as two other attempts made by Cnut
+within a few weeks of each other to capture London
+by siege, were frustrated by the determined
+opposition of the citizens.<a id="noteref_59" name="noteref_59" href="#note_59"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">59</span></span></a> "Almighty God saved
+it," as the chronicler piously remarks.<a id="noteref_60" name="noteref_60" href="#note_60"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">60</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Victory of the Danes at Assandun, 1016.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Nor was Cnut more successful in the field, being
+worsted in no less than five pitched battles against
+Edmund, until by the treachery of Edmund's brother-in-law,
+Eadric, alderman of Mercia, he succeeded at
+last in vanquishing the English army on the memorable
+field of Assandun.<a id="noteref_61" name="noteref_61" href="#note_61"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">61</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Agreement between Edmund and Cnut for partition of the kingdom.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">After this Edmund reluctantly consented to a
+conference and a division of the kingdom. The
+meeting took place at Olney, and there it was agreed
+that Edmund should retain his crown, and rule over
+all England south of the Thames, together with East
+Anglia, Essex and London, whilst Cnut should enjoy
+the rest of the kingdom. "The citizens, beneath
+whose walls the power of Cnut and his father had
+been so often shattered, now made peace with the
+Danish host. As usual, money was paid to them,
+and they were allowed to winter as friends within
+the unconquered city."<a id="noteref_62" name="noteref_62" href="#note_62"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">62</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Cnut king of all England, 1016-1035.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The partition of the kingdom between Edmund
+and Cnut had scarcely been agreed upon before the
+former unexpectedly died (30th Nov., 1016) and Cnut<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page025">[pg 025]</span><a name="Pg025" id="Pg025" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc19" id="toc19"></a>
+became master of London and king of all England.
+His rule was mild, beneficent and just, recognising no
+distinction between Dane and Englishman, and
+throughout his long reign of nearly twenty years
+the citizens of London enjoyed that perfect peace so
+necessary for the successful exercise of their commercial
+pursuits.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Election of Cnut's Successors. 1183.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">At the election of Cnut's successor which took
+place at Oxford in 1035, the Londoners again played
+an important part. This time, however, it was
+not the "burhwaru or burgesses" of the City who
+attended the gemót which had been summoned for
+the purpose of election, but "lithsmen" of London.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The lithsmen of London attend gemót at Oxford.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">As to who these "lithsmen" were, and how they
+came to represent the City (if indeed they represented
+the City at all) on this important occasion much
+controversy has arisen. To some they appear as
+nothing more than the "nautic multitude" or "sea-faring
+men" of London.<a id="noteref_63" name="noteref_63" href="#note_63"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">63</span></span></a> On the other hand, there
+are those who hold that they were merchants who
+had achieved thane right under the provisions of
+Athelstan's day already mentioned;<a id="noteref_64" name="noteref_64" href="#note_64"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">64</span></span></a> whilst there are
+still others who are inclined to look upon them as so
+many commercial travellers who had made their way
+to Oxford by river in the ordinary course of business,
+and who happened by good fortune to have been in that
+city at the time of a great political crisis.<a id="noteref_65" name="noteref_65" href="#note_65"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">65</span></span></a> The truth<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page026">[pg 026]</span><a name="Pg026" id="Pg026" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+probably lies somewhere between these extremes.
+The "lithsmen" may not themselves have been
+thanes, although they are recorded as having been at
+Oxford with almost all the thanes north of the
+Thames;<a id="noteref_66" name="noteref_66" href="#note_66"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">66</span></span></a> but that they were something more than
+mere watermen, such as we shall see joining with the
+apprentices of London at important political crises,
+and that they were acting more or less as representatives
+of the Londoners who had already acquired a
+predominant voice in such matters, seems beyond doubt.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Londoners desire for peace above all things.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">During the next thirty years London took no
+prominent part in the affairs of the country, content if
+only allowed to have leisure to mind its own business.
+The desire for peace is the key-note to the action
+of the citizens of London at every important crisis.
+Without peace, commerce became paralyzed. Peace
+could be best secured by a strong government, and
+such a government, whether in the person of a king
+or protector could count upon their support. "For
+it they were ready to devote their money and their
+lives, for commerce, the child of opportunity, brought
+wealth; wealth power; and power led independence
+in its train." The quarrels of the half-brothers,
+Harold and Harthacnut, the attempt by one or both
+of the sons of Ethelred and Emma to recover their
+father's kingdom, and the question of the innocence or
+guilt of Earl Godwine in connection with the murder
+of one of them, affected the citizens of London only so
+far as such disturbances were likely to impede the
+traffic of the Thames or to make it dangerous for them
+to convey their merchandise along the highways of
+the country.</p>
+
+<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page027">[pg 027]</span><a name="Pg027" id="Pg027" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc20" id="toc20"></a>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Revival of Danegelt, </span><span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-size: 80%; font-variant: small-caps">A.D.</span></span><span style="font-size: 80%">, 1040.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The payment of Danegelt at the accession of
+Harthacnut (<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-variant: small-caps">A.D.</span></span> 1040),<a id="noteref_67" name="noteref_67" href="#note_67"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">67</span></span></a> probably touched the feelings,
+as it certainly did the pockets, of the Londoners,
+more than any other event which happened during
+this period.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">London the recognised capital, </span><span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-size: 80%; font-style: italic">temp.</span></span><span style="font-size: 80%"> Edward, Confessor.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Upon the sudden death of Harthacnut (<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-variant: small-caps">A.D.</span></span>
+1042), who died in a fit "as he stood at his drink,"<a id="noteref_68" name="noteref_68" href="#note_68"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">68</span></span></a>
+the choice of the whole nation fell on Edward, his
+half-brother—"before the king buried were, all folk
+chose Edward to king at London."<a id="noteref_69" name="noteref_69" href="#note_69"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">69</span></span></a> The share that
+the Londoners took in this particular election is not
+so clear as in other cases. Nevertheless, the importance
+of the citizens was daily growing, and by the time of
+the accession of Edward the Confessor, the City was
+recognised as the capital of the kingdom, the chief
+seat for the administration of the law, and the place
+where the king usually resided.<a id="noteref_70" name="noteref_70" href="#note_70"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">70</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Gemóts held in London.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">In early Saxon times the witan had met in any
+town where the king happened at the time to be;
+and although theoretically every freeman had a right
+to attend its meetings, practically the citizens of the
+town wherein the gemót happened at the time to be
+held, enjoyed an advantage over freemen coming from
+a distance. Alfred ordained that the witan should<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page028">[pg 028]</span><a name="Pg028" id="Pg028" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+meet in London for purposes of legislation twice a
+year.<a id="noteref_71" name="noteref_71" href="#note_71"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">71</span></span></a> Athelstan, Edmund and Edgar had held
+gemóts in London, the last mentioned king holding a
+great gemót (<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">mycel gemót</span></span>) in St. Paul's Church in 973.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">London declares for Godwine, 1052.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">During the reign of Edward the Confessor, at
+least six meetings of the witan took place in London;
+the more important of these being held in 1051 and
+the following year. By the gemót of 1051, which
+partook of the nature of a court-martial, Earl Godwine
+was condemned to banishment; but before a twelve-month
+had elapsed, he was welcomed back at a great
+assembly or <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">mycel gemót</span></span> held in the open air without
+the walls of London.<a id="noteref_72" name="noteref_72" href="#note_72"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">72</span></span></a> The nation had become
+disatisfied owing to the king's increasing favour to
+Norman strangers, but the earl desired to learn how
+stood the City of London towards him, and for this
+purpose made a stay at Southwark. He was soon
+satisfied on this point. "The townsfolk of the great
+city were not a whit behind their brethren of Kent
+and Sussex in their zeal for the national cause. The
+spirit which had beaten back Swend and Cnut, the
+spirit which was in after times to make London ever
+the stronghold of English freedom, the spirit which
+made its citizens foremost in the patriot armies alike
+of the thirteenth and of the seventeenth centuries,
+was now as warm in the hearts of those gallant
+burghers as in any earlier or later age. With a
+voice all but unanimous, the citizens declared in
+favour of the deliverer; a few votes only, the votes,
+it may be, of strangers or of courtiers, were given<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page029">[pg 029]</span><a name="Pg029" id="Pg029" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc21" id="toc21"></a>
+against the emphatic resolution, that what the earl
+would the city would."<a id="noteref_73" name="noteref_73" href="#note_73"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">73</span></span></a> Having secured the favour
+of London his cause was secure. That the citizens
+heartily welcomed the earl, going forth in a body to
+meet him on his arrival, we learn also from another
+source;<a id="noteref_74" name="noteref_74" href="#note_74"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">74</span></span></a> although, one at least of the ancient chroniclers
+strongly hints that the favour of the citizens had
+been obtained by bribes and promises.<a id="noteref_75" name="noteref_75" href="#note_75"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">75</span></span></a> The earl's
+return was marked by decrees of outlawry against the
+king's foreign favourites, whose malign influence he
+had endeavoured formerly to counteract, and who had
+proved themselves strong enough to procure the
+banishment of himself and family.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The dedication of Westminster Abbey, </span><span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-size: 80%; font-variant: small-caps">A.D.</span></span><span style="font-size: 80%"> 1065.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The last gemót held under Edward was one
+specially summoned to meet at Westminster at the
+close of the year 1065, for the purpose of witnessing
+the dedication of the new abbey church which the
+king loved so well and to which his remains were so
+shortly afterwards to be carried.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Death of Edward the Confessor.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">He died at the opening of the year, and the same
+witan who had attended his obsequies elected Harold,
+the late Earl Godwine's son, as his successor. This
+election, however, was doomed to be overthrown by
+the powerful sword of William the Norman.</p>
+</div>
+</div>
+
+<hr class="doublepage" /><div class="tei tei-div" style="margin-bottom: 5.00em; margin-top: 5.00em">
+<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page030">[pg 030]</span><a name="Pg030" id="Pg030" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+<a name="toc22" id="toc22"></a>
+<a name="pdf23" id="pdf23"></a>
+<h1 class="tei tei-head" style="text-align: left; margin-bottom: 3.46em; margin-top: 3.46em"><span style="font-size: 173%">CHAPTER II.</span></h1>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-div" style="margin-bottom: 4.00em; margin-top: 4.00em">
+<h2 class="tei tei-head" style="text-align: left; margin-bottom: 2.88em; margin-top: 2.88em"></h2>
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The landing of William, and Battle of Senlac, 1066.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">As soon as the news of Harold's coronation
+reached William of Normandy, he claimed the crown
+which Edward the Confessor had promised him. According
+to every principle of succession recognised in
+England, at the time, he had no right to the crown
+whatever. When the Norman invader landed at
+Pevensey, Harold was at York, having recently succeeded
+in defeating his brother Tostig, the deposed
+Earl of Northumbria, who, with the assistance of
+Harold Hardrada, had attacked the northern earls,
+Edwine and Morkere. On hearing of the Duke's
+landing, Harold hastened to London. A general
+muster of forces was there ordered, and Edwine and
+Morkere, who were bound to Harold by family tie—the
+King having married their sister—were bidden
+to march southward with the whole force of their
+earldoms. But neither gratitude for their late deliverance
+at the hands of their brother-in-law, nor family
+affection, could hurry the steps of these earls, and
+they arrived too late. The battle of Senlac, better
+known as the battle of Hastings, had been won and
+lost (14th Oct., 1066), the Norman was conqueror, and
+Harold had perished. For a second time within
+twelve months the English throne was vacant.<a id="noteref_76" name="noteref_76" href="#note_76"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">76</span></span></a></p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The times were too critical to hold a formal gemót
+for the election of a successor to the throne; but the<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page031">[pg 031]</span><a name="Pg031" id="Pg031" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc24" id="toc24"></a>
+citizens of London and the sailors or "butsecarls"
+(whom it is difficult not to associate with the "lithsmen"
+of former days) showed a marked predilection in favour
+of Edgar the Atheling, grandson of Edmund Ironside,
+and the sole survivor of the old royal line. The
+Archbishop, too, as well as the northern earls, were in
+his favour, but the latter soon withdrew to their
+respective earldoms and left London and the Atheling
+to their fate.<a id="noteref_77" name="noteref_77" href="#note_77"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">77</span></span></a> Thus, "the patriotic zeal of the men
+of London was thwarted by the base secession of the
+northern traitors."</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">William's March to London.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">After waiting awhile at Hastings for the country
+to make voluntary submission, and finding that homagers
+did not come in, William proceeded to make a
+further display of force. In this he betrayed no haste,
+but made his way through Kent in leisurely fashion,
+receiving on his way the submission of Winchester
+and Canterbury, using no more force than was
+absolutely necessary, and endeavouring to allay all
+fears, until at length he reached the suburbs of
+London.<a id="noteref_78" name="noteref_78" href="#note_78"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">78</span></span></a></p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">He had been astute enough to give out that he
+came not to claim a crown, but only a right to be put
+in nomination for it. To the mind of the Londoner,
+such quibbling failed to commend itself, and the
+citizens lost no time in putting their city into a posture<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page032">[pg 032]</span><a name="Pg032" id="Pg032" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+of defence, determined not to surrender it without a
+blow.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Sets fire to Southwark in hopes of terrifying the citizens.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Upon William's arrival in Southwark, the citizens
+sallied forth. They were, however, beaten back after
+a sharp skirmish, and compelled to seek shelter again
+within their city's walls. William hesitated to make
+a direct attack upon the city, but hoped by setting
+fire to Southwark to strike terror into the inhabitants
+and bring them to a voluntary surrender. He failed
+in his object; the city still held out, and William next
+resorted to diplomacy.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Negotiations between William and the City.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The ruling spirit within the city at that time
+was Ansgar or Esegar the "Staller" under whom,
+as Sheriff of Middlesex, the citizens had marched
+out to fight around the royal standard at Hastings.
+He had been carried wounded from the field, and
+was now borne hither and thither on a litter, encouraging
+the citizens to make a stout defence of
+their city. To him, it is said, William sent a private
+message from Berkhampstead, asking only that the
+Conqueror's right to the crown of England might be
+acknowledged and nothing more, the real power of
+the kingdom might remain with Ansgar if he so
+willed. Determined not to be outwitted by the
+Norman, Ansgar (so the story goes) summoned a
+meeting of the eldermen (<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">natu majores</span></span>) of the City—the
+forerunners of the later aldermen—and proposed
+a feigned submission which might stave off immediate
+danger. The proposal was accepted and a
+messenger despatched. William pretended to accept
+the terms offered, and at the same time so worked
+upon the messenger with fair promises and gifts that
+on his return he converted his fellow citizens and<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page033">[pg 033]</span><a name="Pg033" id="Pg033" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc25" id="toc25"></a>
+induced them by representations of the Conqueror's
+friendly intentions and of the hopelessness of resistance,
+to make their submission to him, and to throw
+over the young Atheling.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">London submits to the Conqueror.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Whatever poetic tinge there may be about the
+story as told by Guy of Amiens, it is certain that the
+citizens came to the same resolution, in effect, as that
+described by the poet, nor could they well have done
+otherwise. The whole of the country for miles
+around London, had already tendered submission or
+been forced into it. The city had become completely
+isolated, and sooner or later its inhabitants must have
+been starved out. There was, moreover, a strong
+foreign element within its walls.<a id="noteref_79" name="noteref_79" href="#note_79"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">79</span></span></a> Norman followers
+of Edward the Confessor were ever at hand to counsel
+submission. London submitted, the citizens accepting
+the rule of the Norman Conqueror as they had
+formerly accepted that of Cnut the Dane, "from
+necessity." An embassy was despatched to Berkhampstead,
+comprising the Archbishop of York, the
+young Atheling, the earls Edwine and Morkere, and
+"all the best men of London," to render homage and
+give hostages,<a id="noteref_80" name="noteref_80" href="#note_80"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">80</span></span></a> and thus it was, that within three
+months of his landing, William was acknowledged as
+the lawfully elected King of England, and, as such, he
+crowned himself at Westminster, promising to govern
+the nation as well as any king before him if they
+would be faithful to him.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">His charter to the citizens of London.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The conciliatory spirit of William towards the
+Londoners is seen in the favourable terms he was
+ready to concede them. Soon after his coronation—<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page034">[pg 034]</span><a name="Pg034" id="Pg034" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+the precise date cannot be determined—he granted
+them a charter,<a id="noteref_81" name="noteref_81" href="#note_81"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">81</span></span></a> by which he clearly declared his
+purpose not to reduce the citizens to a state of
+dependent vassalage, but to establish them in all the
+rights and privileges they had hitherto enjoyed.</p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The charter, rendered into modern English, runs
+as follows:—</p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">"William, King, greets William, Bishop, and Gosfregdh,
+Portreeve, and all the burgesses within London,
+French and English, friendly. And I give you to
+know that I will that ye be all those laws worthy
+that ye were in King Eadward's day.<a id="noteref_82" name="noteref_82" href="#note_82"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">82</span></span></a> And I will
+that every child be his father's heir after his father's
+day and I will not suffer that any man offer you any
+wrong. God keep you."</p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The terms of the charter are worthy of study.
+They are primarily remarkable as indicating that the
+City of London was, at the time, subject to a government
+which combined the secular authority of the
+port-reeve with the ecclesiastical authority of the
+bishop. It was said, indeed, to have been greatly
+due to the latter's intercession that the charter was<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page035">[pg 035]</span><a name="Pg035" id="Pg035" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc26" id="toc26"></a>
+granted at all, and, in this belief, the mayor and
+aldermen were long accustomed to pay a solemn
+visit to the bishop's tomb in St. Paul's church, there
+to hear a <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">De profundis</span></span> on the day when the new
+mayor took his oath of office before the Barons of the
+Exchequer.<a id="noteref_83" name="noteref_83" href="#note_83"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">83</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The office of port-reeve.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">As regards the port-reeve—the <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">port-gerefa</span></span>, <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">i.e.</span></span>,
+reeve of the port or town of London<a id="noteref_84" name="noteref_84" href="#note_84"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">84</span></span></a>—the nature and
+extent of his duties and authority, much uncertainty
+exists. Whilst, in many respects, his position in a
+borough was analogous no doubt to the shire-reeve or
+sheriff of a county, there were, on the other hand,
+duties belonging to and exercised by the one which
+were not exercised by the other. Thus, for instance,
+the port-reeve, unlike the sheriff, exercised no judicial
+functions in a criminal court, nor presided over court-leets
+in the city as the sheriff did in his county by
+<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">turn</span></span>, the latter being held independently by the
+alderman of each ward.<a id="noteref_85" name="noteref_85" href="#note_85"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">85</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The foreign element already existing in the City.</span></div></div>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Its increase after the Conquest.</span></div></div>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The charter makes no new grant.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">In the next place the charter brings prominently
+to our notice the fact that there was already existing
+within the City's walls a strong Norman element,
+existing side by side with the older English burgesses,<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page036">[pg 036]</span><a name="Pg036" id="Pg036" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+which the Conqueror did well not to ignore. The
+descendants of the foreign merchants from France
+and Normandy, for whose protection Ethelred had
+legislated more than half a century before, had continued
+to carry on their commercial intercourse with
+the Londoners, and were looking forward to a freer
+interchange of merchandise now that the two countries
+were under one sovereign. Their expectation
+was justified. No sooner had London submitted to
+the Norman Conqueror than, we are told, "many of
+the citizens of Rouen and Caen passed over thither,
+preferring to be dwellers in that city, inasmuch as it
+was fitter for their trading, and better stored with
+the merchandise in which they were wont to
+traffic."<a id="noteref_86" name="noteref_86" href="#note_86"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">86</span></span></a> But by far the most important clause in
+the charter is that which places the citizens of London
+in the same position respecting the law of the land as
+they enjoyed in the days of their late king, Edward
+the Confessor. Here there is distinct evidence that
+the Conqueror had come "neither to destroy, nor to
+found, but to continue."<a id="noteref_87" name="noteref_87" href="#note_87"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">87</span></span></a> The charter granted
+nothing new; it only ratified and set the royal
+seal<a id="noteref_88" name="noteref_88" href="#note_88"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">88</span></span></a> to the rights and privileges of the citizens
+already in existence.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">William's other charter granting the sheriffwick of London.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">It is recorded that William granted another
+charter to the citizens of London, vesting in them the
+City and Sheriffwick of London, and this charter the
+citizens proffered as evidence of their rights over the
+cloister and church of St. Martin le Grand, when those<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page037">[pg 037]</span><a name="Pg037" id="Pg037" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc27" id="toc27"></a>
+rights were challenged in the reign of Henry VI.<a id="noteref_89" name="noteref_89" href="#note_89"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">89</span></span></a>
+This charter has since been lost.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The strong government of William.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The compact thus made between London and the
+Conqueror was faithfully kept by both parties. Having
+ascended the English throne by the aid of the citizens
+of London, William, unlike many of his successors,
+was careful not to infringe the terms of their charter,
+whilst the citizens on the other hand continued loyal
+to their accepted king, and lent him assistance to put
+down insurgents in other parts of the kingdom. The
+fortress which William erected within their city's
+walls did not disturb their equanimity. It was sufficient
+for them that, under the Conqueror's rule, the
+country was once more peaceful, so peaceful that, according
+to the chronicler, a young maiden could
+travel the length of England without being injured
+or robbed.<a id="noteref_90" name="noteref_90" href="#note_90"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">90</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">"Doomsday" Book completed.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The close of the reign of William the First witnessed
+the completion of "Doomsday," or survey of
+the kingdom, which he had ordered to be made for
+fiscal purposes. For some reason not explained,
+neither London nor Winchester—the two capitals, so to
+speak, of the kingdom—were included in this survey.
+It may be that the importance of these boroughs,<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page038">[pg 038]</span><a name="Pg038" id="Pg038" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+their wealth and population, necessitated some special
+method of procedure; but this does not account for
+the omission of Northumberland, Cumberland, Westmorland,
+and Durham, from the survey. We know
+that Winchester was afterwards surveyed, but no
+steps in the same direction were ever taken with respect
+to London. The survey was not effected without
+disturbances, owing to the inquisitorial power
+vested in the commissioners appointed to carry it out.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Death of William the Conqueror, and accession of his son, 1087.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">William died whilst on a visit to his duchy of
+Normandy, and "he who was before a powerful
+king, and lord of many a land, had then of all his
+land, only a portion of seven feet."<a id="noteref_91" name="noteref_91" href="#note_91"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">91</span></span></a> the same
+which, to this day, holds his mortal remains in the
+Abbey at Caen. He was succeeded by William his
+son. The death of the father and accession of his
+son was marked by fire, pestilence, and famine.<a id="noteref_92" name="noteref_92" href="#note_92"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">92</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">St. Paul's destroyed by fire, 1087.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">A fire destroyed St. Paul's and the greater part
+of the City. Maurice, Bishop of London, at once
+set to work to rebuild the Cathedral on a larger and
+more magnificent scale, erecting the edifice upon arches
+in a manner little known in England at that time, but
+long practised in France. The Norman Conquest was
+already working for good. Not only the style of
+architecture, but the very stone used in re-building St.
+Paul's came from France, the famous quarries of Caen
+being utilised for the purpose.<a id="noteref_93" name="noteref_93" href="#note_93"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">93</span></span></a></p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">There was already in the city, one church built
+after the same manner, and on that account called
+St. Mary of Arches or "le Bow." The object of<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page039">[pg 039]</span><a name="Pg039" id="Pg039" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc28" id="toc28"></a>
+setting churches and other buildings upon vaults was
+to guard against fire. Whatever defence against fire
+this method of building may have afforded, it was
+certainly no defence against wind. In 1091, the roof
+of St. Mary-le-Bow was clean blown off, huge baulks
+of timber, 26 feet long, being driven into the ground
+with such force that scarce 4 feet of them could
+be seen.<a id="noteref_94" name="noteref_94" href="#note_94"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">94</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The Tower strengthened and the bridge repaired, 1097.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The reign of the new king was one of oppression.
+Nevertheless, he continued to secure that protection
+for life and property which his father had so successfully
+achieved, so that a man "who had confidence in
+himself" and was "aught," could travel the length and
+breadth of the land unhurt, "with his bosom full of
+gold."<a id="noteref_95" name="noteref_95" href="#note_95"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">95</span></span></a> He also had an eye for the protection of
+the city, and the advancement of its commerce, surrounding
+the Tower of London by a wall, and repairing
+the bridge which had been nearly washed
+away by a flood.<a id="noteref_96" name="noteref_96" href="#note_96"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">96</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Election of Henry I by the Witan at Winchester, 1100.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">On the 2nd August, 1100, the Red King met his
+death suddenly in the New Forest, and the next day
+was buried at Winchester. According to a previous
+agreement, the crown should have immediately
+devolved upon his brother Robert. Crowns, however,
+were not to be thus disposed of; they fell only
+to those ready and strong enough to seize them.
+Robert was far away on a crusade. His younger
+brother Henry was on the spot, and upon him fell the
+choice of such of the witan as happened to be in or
+near Winchester at the time of the late king's death.<a id="noteref_97" name="noteref_97" href="#note_97"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">97</span></span></a></p>
+
+<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page040">[pg 040]</span><a name="Pg040" id="Pg040" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Their choice confirmed by the City of London.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The two days that elapsed before his coronation
+at Westminster (5th August), the king-elect spent in
+London, where by his easy and eloquent manner, as
+well as by fair promises, he succeeded in winning the
+inhabitants over to his cause, to the rejection of the
+claims of Robert. The election, or perhaps we should
+rather say, the selection of Henry by the witan at
+Winchester, was thus approved and confirmed by the
+whole realm (<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">regni universitas</span></span>), in the city of
+London.</p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The choice was made however on one condition,
+viz.:—that Henry should restore to his subjects their
+ancient liberties and customs enjoyed in the days of
+Edward the Confessor.<a id="noteref_98" name="noteref_98" href="#note_98"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">98</span></span></a> The charter thus obtained
+served as an exemplar for the great charter of liberties
+which was to be subsequently wrung from King John.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Henry's charter to the City of London.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Another charter was granted by the new king—a
+charter to the citizens of London—granted, as some
+have thought, soon after his accession, and by way of
+recognition of the services they had rendered him
+towards obtaining the crown. This however appears
+to be a mistake. There is reason for supposing that
+this charter was not granted until at least thirty years
+after he was seated on the throne.<a id="noteref_99" name="noteref_99" href="#note_99"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">99</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The main features of the charter.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The chief features of the grant<a id="noteref_100" name="noteref_100" href="#note_100"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">100</span></span></a> were that the
+citizens were thenceforth to be allowed to hold
+Middlesex to farm at a rent of £300 a year, and to<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page041">[pg 041]</span><a name="Pg041" id="Pg041" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc29" id="toc29"></a>
+appoint from among themselves whom they would to
+be sheriff over it; they were further to be allowed to
+appoint their own justiciar to hold pleas of the
+crown, and no other justiciar should exercise authority
+over them; they were not to be forced to plead
+without the city's walls; they were to be exempt
+from scot and lot and of all payments in respect
+of Danegelt and murder; they were to be allowed to
+purge themselves after the English fashion of making
+oath and not after the Norman fashion by wager of
+battle; their goods were to be free of all manner of
+customs, toll, passage and lestage; their husting court
+might sit once a week; and lastly, they might resort
+to "withernam" or reprisal in cases where their goods
+had been unlawfully seized.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The grant of Middlesex to ferm, and choice of sheriff.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Touching the true import of this grant of Middlesex
+to the citizens at a yearly rent, with the right of
+appointing their own sheriff over it, no less than the
+identity of the justiciar whom they were to be
+allowed to choose for themselves for the purpose of
+hearing pleas of the crown within the city, much
+divergence of opinion exists. Some believe that
+the government of the city was hereby separated
+from that of the shire wherein it was situate, and that
+the right of appointing their own justiciar which the
+citizens obtained by this charter was the right of
+electing a sheriff for the city of London in the place
+of the non-elective ancient port-reeve. Others deny
+that the charter introduced the shire organization into
+the government of the city, and believe the justiciar and
+sheriff to have been distinct officials.<a id="noteref_101" name="noteref_101" href="#note_101"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">101</span></span></a> The latter appear
+to hold the more plausible view. Putting aside<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page042">[pg 042]</span><a name="Pg042" id="Pg042" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+the so-called charter of William the First, granting to
+the citizens in express terms <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">civitatem et vice-comitatum
+Londoniæ</span></span>, as wanting in corroboration, a
+solution of the difficulty may be found if we consider
+(1) that the city received a shire organization and
+became in itself to all intents and purposes a county
+as soon as it came to be governed by a port-reeve, if
+not as soon as an alderman had been set over it by
+Alfred; (2) that the duties of the shrievalty in respect
+of the county of the city of London were at this time
+performed either by a port-reeve or by one or more
+officers, known subsequently as sheriffs, and (3) that
+for the right of executing these duties no rent or ferm
+was ever demanded or paid.<a id="noteref_102" name="noteref_102" href="#note_102"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">102</span></span></a></p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">If this be a correct view of the matter, it would
+appear that the effect of Henry's grant of Middlesex
+to the citizens to farm, and of the appointment of a
+sheriff over it of their own choice, was not so much
+to render the city independent of the shire, as to
+make the shire subject to the city. It must be borne
+in mind that no sheriff (or sheriffs) has ever been
+elected by the citizens for Middlesex alone, the
+duties appertaining to the sheriff-wick of Middlesex
+having always been performed by the sheriffs of the
+city for the time being.<a id="noteref_103" name="noteref_103" href="#note_103"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">103</span></span></a> Hence it is that the shrievalty
+of London and Middlesex is often spoken of as the
+shrievalty of "London" alone, and the shrievalty of<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page043">[pg 043]</span><a name="Pg043" id="Pg043" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc30" id="toc30"></a>
+"Middlesex" alone (the same officers executing the
+duties of both shrievalties) and the <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">firma</span></span> of £300
+paid for the shrievalty of Middlesex alone is sometimes
+described as the <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">firma</span></span> of "London," sometimes
+of "Middlesex," and sometimes of "London and
+Middlesex."<a id="noteref_104" name="noteref_104" href="#note_104"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">104</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The citizens' right to elect their own Justiciar.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The right of electing their own justiciar granted
+to the citizens by Henry resolves itself into little more
+than a confirmation of the right to elect their own
+sheriffs.<a id="noteref_105" name="noteref_105" href="#note_105"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">105</span></span></a> Just as sheriffs are known to have held pleas
+of the crown in the counties up to the time of the
+Great Charter (although their duties were modified by
+Henry I, and again by Henry II, when he appointed
+Justices in eyre) so in the city of London, no one,
+except the sheriffs of London could hold pleas of the
+crown, and an attempt made by the Barons in 1258
+to introduce a justiciar into the Guildhall was persistently
+challenged by the citizens.<a id="noteref_106" name="noteref_106" href="#note_106"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">106</span></span></a></p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Even those who stedfastly maintain that in the
+country the sheriff and justiciar grew up to be two
+distinct officers, the one representing local interest and
+the other imperial, are willing to allow that in the<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page044">[pg 044]</span><a name="Pg044" id="Pg044" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+city of London such distinction was evanescent. The
+office of justiciar in the city was twice granted <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">eo
+nomine</span></span> to Geoffrey de Mandeville, Earl of Essex, and
+it is twice mentioned as having been held by one
+named Gervase, who (there is reason to believe) is
+identical with Gervase de Cornhill, a Sheriff of London
+in 1155 and 1156; but the office became extinct at
+the accession of Henry II.<a id="noteref_107" name="noteref_107" href="#note_107"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">107</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">London and the election of Stephen, 1135</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The events which followed Henry's decease
+afford us another instance of the futility of all attempts
+at this early period to settle the succession to the
+crown before the throne was actually vacant. The
+King's nephew, Stephen of Blois, and the nobility of
+England had sworn to accept the King's daughter
+Matilda, wife of Geoffery of Anjou, as their sovereign
+on the death of her father; yet when that event took
+place in 1135, Stephen, in spite of his oath, claimed
+the crown as nearest male heir of the Conqueror's
+blood.<a id="noteref_108" name="noteref_108" href="#note_108"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">108</span></span></a></p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">There was no doubt of his popularity, whilst
+Matilda on the other hand injured her cause by
+marrying an Angevin. On the continent a bitter feud
+existed between Norman and Angevin; in England
+the Norman had steadily increased in favour, and
+England's crown was Stephen's if he had courage
+enough to seize it.</p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Landing on the Kentish coast, his first reception
+was far from encouraging. Canterbury and Dover, held
+by the Earl of Gloucester, refused to acknowledge<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page045">[pg 045]</span><a name="Pg045" id="Pg045" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc31" id="toc31"></a>
+him and closed their gates on his approach. Undismayed
+by these rebuffs, Stephen pushed on to London,
+where he was welcomed by every token of good will.
+The Londoners had been no party to the agreement
+to recognise Matilda as Henry's successor; they had
+become accustomed to exercising a right of sharing
+in the choice of a king who should reign over them,
+and they now chose Stephen. "It was their right,
+their special privilege," said they, "on the occasion of
+the king's decease, to provide another in his place."<a id="noteref_109" name="noteref_109" href="#note_109"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">109</span></span></a>
+There was no time to be lost, the country was in
+danger, Stephen was at hand, sent to them, as they
+believed, by the goodness of Providence. They could
+not do better than elect him: and elected he was
+by the assembled aldermen or eldermen (<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">majores
+natu</span></span>) of the City.</p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Such is the story of Stephen's election as given
+by the author of the "Gesta Stephani," one who
+wrote as an eye-witness of what took place, but
+whose statements cannot always be taken as those of
+an independent chronicler of events. Informal as this
+election may have been, it marks an important epoch
+in the annals of London. Thenceforth the city
+assumes a pre-eminent position and exercises a predominant
+influence in the public affairs of the kingdom.<a id="noteref_110" name="noteref_110" href="#note_110"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">110</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Coronation of Stephen, December, 1135.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">From London Stephen went down to Winchester,
+where he was heartily welcomed by his brother Henry,<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page046">[pg 046]</span><a name="Pg046" id="Pg046" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+recently appointed papal legate. Next to London, it
+was important that Stephen should secure Winchester,
+and now that London had spoken, the citizens of
+Winchester no longer hesitated to throw in their lot
+with the king. Winchester secured, and Stephen put
+in possession of the royal castle and treasury, he
+returned to London, where all doubts as to the
+validity or invalidity of his election were set at rest
+by the ceremony of coronation (Dec. 1135).</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">A great Council held in London, April, 1136.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">In the spring of the following year (April 1136),
+a brilliant council of the clergy and magnates of the
+realm was held in London,<a id="noteref_111" name="noteref_111" href="#note_111"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">111</span></span></a> reminding one of the
+Easter courts of the days of the Conqueror which
+latterly had been shorn of much of their splendour.
+The occasion was one for introducing the new king to
+his subjects as well as for confirming the liberties of
+the church, and Stephen may have taken special care
+to surround it with exceptional splendour as a set off
+against the meagreness which had characterised the
+recent ceremony of his coronation.<a id="noteref_112" name="noteref_112" href="#note_112"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">112</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Arrival of the Empress Matilda in England. 1139.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">In the meanwhile the injured Matilda appealed
+to Rome, but only with the result that her rival
+received formal recognition from the Pope. Three
+years later (1139) she landed in England accompanied
+by her brother, the Earl of Gloucester. She soon
+obtained a following, more especially in the west; and
+Winchester—the seat of the royal residence of the
+queens of England since the time when Ethelred
+presented the city as a "morning gift" to his consort at
+their marriage—became her headquarters and rallying<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page047">[pg 047]</span><a name="Pg047" id="Pg047" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc32" id="toc32"></a>
+point for her supporters, whilst London served in the
+same way for Stephen.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Attempted negotiations between Stephen and Matilda, May, 1140.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">After nine months of sieges and counter sieges,
+marches and counter marches, in which neither party
+could claim any decided success, Stephen, as was his
+wont, withdrew to London and shut himself up in the
+Tower, with only a single bishop, and he a foreigner,
+in his train. Whilst safe behind the walls of that
+stronghold, negotiations were opened between him and
+the empress for a peaceful settlement of their respective
+claims (May, 1140), Henry of Winchester
+acting as intermediary between the rival parties.<a id="noteref_113" name="noteref_113" href="#note_113"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">113</span></span></a>
+The negotiations ended without effecting the desired
+result.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Matilda formally acknowledged "Lady of England," 1141.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Matters assumed an entirely different aspect when
+Stephen was made prisoner at Lincoln in the following
+year (2nd Feb., 1141). Henry of Winchester forsook
+his rôle of arbitrator, and entered into a formal
+compact with the empress who arrived before Winchester
+with the laurels of her recent success yet
+fresh, agreeing to receive her as "Lady of England,"
+(<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Domina Angliæ</span></span>) and promising her the allegiance of
+himself and his followers so long as she would keep
+her oath and allow him a free hand in ecclesiastical
+matters.<a id="noteref_114" name="noteref_114" href="#note_114"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">114</span></span></a></p>
+
+<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page048">[pg 048]</span><a name="Pg048" id="Pg048" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">A synod at Winchester, 7th April, 1141.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">This compact was entered into on the 2nd March,
+and on the following day the empress was received
+with solemn pomp into Winchester Cathedral. It
+remained for the compact to be ratified. For this
+purpose an ecclesiastical synod was summoned to sit
+at Winchester on the 7th April. The day was spent
+by the legate holding informal communications with
+the bishops, abbots, and archdeacons who were in
+attendance, and who then for the first time in England's
+history claimed the right not only of consecration,
+but of election of the sovereign.<a id="noteref_115" name="noteref_115" href="#note_115"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">115</span></span></a></p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">On the 8th April, Henry in a long speech announced
+to the assembled clergy the result of the conclave of
+the previous day. He extolled the good government
+of the late king who before his death had caused fealty
+to be sworn to his daughter, the empress. The delay
+of the empress in coming to England (he said) had
+been the cause of Stephen's election. The latter had
+forfeited all claim to the crown by his bad government,
+and God's judgment had been pronounced against him.
+Lest therefore, the nation should suffer for want of a
+sovereign, he, as legate, had summoned them together,
+and by them the empress had been elected Lady of
+England. The speech was received with unanimous
+applause, those to whom the election did not commend
+itself being wise enough to hold their tongue.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The Londoners summoned to attend the synod.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">But there was another element to be considered
+before Matilda's new title could be assured. What
+would the Londoners who had taken the initiative in
+setting Stephen on the throne, and still owed to them<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page049">[pg 049]</span><a name="Pg049" id="Pg049" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc33" id="toc33"></a>
+their allegiance, say to it? The legate had foreseen the
+difficulty that might arise if the citizens, whom he
+described as very princes of the realm, by reason of the
+greatness of their city (<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">qui sunt quasi optimates pro
+magnitudine civitatis in Anglia</span></span>), could not be won
+over. He had, therefore, sent a special safe conduct
+for their attendance, so he informed the meeting after
+the applause which followed his speech had died away,
+and he expected them to arrive on the following day.
+If they pleased they would adjourn till then.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">They arrive and request the king's release, 9th April, 1141.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The next day (9th April) the Londoners arrived,
+as the legate had foretold, and were ushered before
+the council. They had been sent, they said, by the so
+called "commune" of London; and their purpose was
+not to enter into debate, but only to beg for the release
+of their lord, the king.<a id="noteref_116" name="noteref_116" href="#note_116"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">116</span></span></a> The statement was supported
+by all the barons then present who had entered the
+commune of the city<a id="noteref_117" name="noteref_117" href="#note_117"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">117</span></span></a> and met with the approval of
+the archbishop and all the clergy in attendance.
+Their solicitations, however, proved of no avail. The
+legate replied with the same arguments he had
+used the day before, adding that it ill became
+the Londoners who were regarded as nobles
+(<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">quasi proceres</span></span>) in the land to foster those who
+had basely deserted their king on the field of battle,
+and who only curried favour with the citizens in order
+to fleece them of their money.</p>
+
+<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page050">[pg 050]</span><a name="Pg050" id="Pg050" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Their request backed up by a letter from the Queen.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Here an interruption took place. A messenger
+presented to the legate a paper from Stephen's queen
+to read to the council. Henry took the paper, and
+after scanning its contents, refused to communicate
+them to the meeting. The messenger, however, not
+to be thus foiled, himself made known the contents of
+the paper. These were, in effect, an exhortation by the
+queen to the clergy, and more especially to the legate
+himself, to restore Stephen to liberty. The legate,
+however, returned the same answer as before, and the
+meeting broke up, the Londoners promising to communicate
+the decision of the council to their brethren
+at home, and to do their best to obtain their support.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The Londoners after much hesitation receive the Empress
+into their city, June, 1141.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The next two months were occupied by the
+empress and her supporters in preparing the way for
+her admission into the city, the inhabitants of which,
+had as yet shown but little disposition towards her.
+But however great their inclination may have been to
+Stephen, they at length found themselves forced to
+transfer their allegiance and to offer, for a time at
+least, a politic submission to the empress. Accordingly,
+a deputation went out to meet her at St. Albans
+(May 1141), and arrange terms on which the city
+should surrender.<a id="noteref_118" name="noteref_118" href="#note_118"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">118</span></span></a></p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">More delay took place; and it was not until
+shortly before midsummer (1141), that she entered
+the city. Her stay was brief. She treated the inhabitants
+as vanquished foes,<a id="noteref_119" name="noteref_119" href="#note_119"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">119</span></span></a> extorted large sums of<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page051">[pg 051]</span><a name="Pg051" id="Pg051" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc34" id="toc34"></a>
+money,<a id="noteref_120" name="noteref_120" href="#note_120"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">120</span></span></a> and haughtily refused to observe the laws
+of Edward the Confessor they valued so much, preferring
+those of the late king, her father.<a id="noteref_121" name="noteref_121" href="#note_121"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">121</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The Empress forced to leave the city.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The consequence was that, within a few days of
+her arrival in London, the inhabitants rose in revolt,
+drove her out of the city<a id="noteref_122" name="noteref_122" href="#note_122"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">122</span></span></a> and attacked the Tower, of
+which Geoffrey de Mandeville was constable, as his
+father William had been before him.<a id="noteref_123" name="noteref_123" href="#note_123"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">123</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Geoffrey de Mandeville, Earl of Essex, and Constable of the Tower, won over by the Empress.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">This Geoffrey de Mandeville had been recently
+created Earl of Essex by Stephen, in the hope and
+expectation that the fortress over which Geoffrey
+was governor, would be held secure for the royal
+cause. The newly fledged earl, however, was one
+who ever fought for his own hand, and was ready to
+sell his fortress and sword to the highest bidder. The
+few days that the empress was in the city, afforded
+her an opportunity of risking a trial to win over the
+earl from his allegiance. To this end she offered to
+confirm him in his earldom and to continue him in his
+office of Constable of the Tower, conferred upon him<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page052">[pg 052]</span><a name="Pg052" id="Pg052" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+by Stephen; in addition to which, she was ready to
+allow him to enjoy lands of the rent of £100 a year,
+a license to fortify his castles, and the posts of sheriff
+and justiciar throughout his earldom. The bait was
+too tempting for the earl not to accept; and a charter
+to the above effect was drawn up and executed.<a id="noteref_124" name="noteref_124" href="#note_124"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">124</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Forsakes the Empress for the Queen.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Scarcely had the fickle earl consented to throw
+in his lot with the empress before she had to flee the
+city. The departure of the empress was quickly
+followed by the arrival of her namesake, Matilda, the
+valiant queen of the captured Stephen; and again the
+earl proved false to his allegiance and actively supported
+the queen in concert with the citizens.<a id="noteref_125" name="noteref_125" href="#note_125"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">125</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Capture of Winchester, and release of Stephen, Sept., 1141.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">With his aid<a id="noteref_126" name="noteref_126" href="#note_126"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">126</span></span></a> and the aid of the Londoners,<a id="noteref_127" name="noteref_127" href="#note_127"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">127</span></span></a> the
+queen was enabled to reduce Winchester and to effect
+the liberation of her husband by exchanging the Earl
+of Gloucester, brother of the empress, for the captured
+king.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">His second charter to Mandeville.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">After being solemnly crowned, for the second
+time,<a id="noteref_128" name="noteref_128" href="#note_128"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">128</span></span></a> at Canterbury, Stephen issued a second charter<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page053">[pg 053]</span><a name="Pg053" id="Pg053" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc35" id="toc35"></a>
+(about Christmas time, 1141),<a id="noteref_129" name="noteref_129" href="#note_129"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">129</span></span></a> to Geoffrey de Mandeville,
+confirming and augmenting the previous grant by
+the empress. Instead of sheriff and justiciar of his own
+county of Essex merely, he is now made sheriff and
+justiciar of London and Middlesex, as well as of
+Hertfordshire.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">London holds the balance between the rival powers.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">But even these great concessions failed to secure
+the earl's fidelity to the king. Again he broke away
+from his allegiance and planned a revolt in favour of
+the empress who recompensed him with still greater
+dignities and possessions than any yet bestowed.
+This second charter of the empress,<a id="noteref_130" name="noteref_130" href="#note_130"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">130</span></span></a> is remarkable for
+a clause in which she promises never to make terms
+with the Londoners without the earl's consent,
+"because they are his mortal foes."<a id="noteref_131" name="noteref_131" href="#note_131"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">131</span></span></a> But the plans
+of the earl were doomed to be frustrated. The
+empress, tired of the struggle, soon ceased to be
+dangerous, and eventually withdrew to the continent,
+and Stephen was left free to deal with the rebel earl
+alone. With the assistance of the Londoners, who
+throughout the long period of civil dissension, were
+generally to be found on the winning side, and held as
+it were the balance between the rival powers, Stephen
+managed after considerable bloodshed to capture
+the fortifications erected by the Earl at Farringdon.<a id="noteref_132" name="noteref_132" href="#note_132"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">132</span></span></a></p>
+
+<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page054">[pg 054]</span><a name="Pg054" id="Pg054" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Arrest of the earl, his freebooting life and death, September, 1143.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The earl was subsequently treacherously arrested
+and made to give up his castles. Thenceforth his
+life was that of a marauding freebooter, until, fatally
+wounded at the siege of Burwell, he expired in September,
+1143.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Arrival of Henry of Anjou in England, 1153</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Notwithstanding the absence of the empress and
+the death of the faithless earl, a desultory kind of war
+continued to be carried on for the next ten years on
+behalf of Henry of Anjou, son of the empress. In
+1153 that prince arrived in England to fight his own
+battles and maintain his right to the crown, which the
+king had already attempted to transfer to the head of
+his own son Eustace. This attempt had been foiled
+by the refusal of the bishops, at the instigation of the
+pope, to perform the ceremony. The sudden death
+of Eustace made the king more ready to enter into
+negotiations for effecting a peaceful settlement.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Peace concluded between Stephen and Henry at Winchester, November, 1153.</span></div></div>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Henry conducted to London.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">A compromise was accordingly effected at Winchester,<a id="noteref_133" name="noteref_133" href="#note_133"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">133</span></span></a>
+whereby Stephen was to remain in undisputed
+possession of the throne for life, and after his
+death was to be succeeded by Henry. The news
+that at last an end had come to the troubles which
+for nineteen years had disturbed the country, was
+received with universal joy, and Henry, conducted to
+London by the king himself, was welcomed in a
+manner befitting one who was now the recognised heir
+to the crown.<a id="noteref_134" name="noteref_134" href="#note_134"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">134</span></span></a></p>
+</div>
+</div>
+
+<hr class="doublepage" /><div class="tei tei-div" style="margin-bottom: 5.00em; margin-top: 5.00em">
+<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page055">[pg 055]</span><a name="Pg055" id="Pg055" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+<a name="toc36" id="toc36"></a>
+<a name="pdf37" id="pdf37"></a>
+<h1 class="tei tei-head" style="text-align: left; margin-bottom: 3.46em; margin-top: 3.46em"><span style="font-size: 173%">CHAPTER III.</span></h1>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-div" style="margin-bottom: 4.00em; margin-top: 4.00em">
+<a name="toc38" id="toc38"></a><h2 class="tei tei-head" style="text-align: left; margin-bottom: 2.88em; margin-top: 2.88em"></h2>
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Fitz-Stephen's description of London.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Both London and Winchester had been laid in
+ashes during Stephen's reign, the former by a conflagration—which
+took place in 1136, again destroying
+St. Paul's and extending from London Bridge to the
+church of St. Clement Danes—the latter by the
+burning missiles used in the conflict between Stephen
+and the empress in 1141. Winchester never recovered
+her position, and London was left without a rival.
+Fitz-Stephen, who wrote an account of the city as it
+stood in the reign of Henry II, describes it as holding
+its head higher than all others; its fame was wider
+known; its wealth and merchandise extended further
+than any other; it was the capital of the kingdom
+(<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">regni Anglorum sedes</span></span>).<a id="noteref_135" name="noteref_135" href="#note_135"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">135</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Thomas of London.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">It was through the mediation of an intimate
+friend and fellow citizen of Fitz-Stephen that Archbishop
+Theobald had invited Henry of Anjou over
+from France in 1153. Thomas of London, better
+known as Thomas Becket, although of foreign descent,
+was born in the heart of the city, having first seen the
+light in the house of Gilbert, his father, some time
+Portreeve of London, situate in Cheapside on a site
+now occupied by the hall and chapel of the Mercers'
+Chapel. Having been ordained a deacon of the
+Church, he became in course of time clerk or chaplain<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page056">[pg 056]</span><a name="Pg056" id="Pg056" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+to the archbishop. Vigorous and active as he was,
+Thomas soon made his influence felt, and it was owing
+to his suggestion (so it is said<a id="noteref_136" name="noteref_136" href="#note_136"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">136</span></span></a>) that the bishops had
+declined to be a party to the coronation of Eustace
+during Stephen's lifetime.</p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">On the accession of Henry, Thomas passed from
+the service of the archbishop, then advanced in years,
+to the service of the young king. He was raised to
+the dignity of chancellor, and became one of the
+king's most trusted advisers. By their united efforts
+order was once again restored throughout the kingdom.
+The great barons, who had established themselves
+in castles erected without royal licence, were
+brought into subjection to the crown and compelled
+to pull down their walls. Upon the death of the
+archbishop, Thomas was appointed to the vacant See
+(1162). From that day forward the friendship between
+king and archbishop began to wane. Henry found
+that all his attempts to establish order in his kingdom
+were thwarted by exemptions claimed by the archbishop
+on behalf of the clergy. He found that
+allegiance to the Crown was divided with allegiance
+to the Pope, and this state of things was likely to
+continue so long as the archbishop lived. Becket's
+end is familiar to us all. His memory was long
+cherished by the citizens of London, who made many
+a pilgrimage to the scene of his martyrdom and left
+many an offering on his tomb in the cathedral of
+Canterbury. It is hard to say for which of the two,
+the father or the son, the citizens entertained the
+greater reverence. For many years after his death it
+was the custom for the Mayor of the City for the<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page057">[pg 057]</span><a name="Pg057" id="Pg057" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc39" id="toc39"></a>
+time being, upon entering into office, to meet the
+aldermen at the church of St. Thomas of Acon—a
+church which had been erected and endowed in
+honour of the murdered archbishop by his sister
+Agnes, wife of Thomas Fitz-Theobald of Helles<a id="noteref_137" name="noteref_137" href="#note_137"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">137</span></span></a>—and
+thence to proceed to the tomb of Gilbert
+Becket, the father, in St. Paul's churchyard, there to
+say a <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">De profundis</span></span>; after which both mayor and
+aldermen returned to the church of St. Thomas, and,
+each having made an offering of two pence, returned
+to his own home.<a id="noteref_138" name="noteref_138" href="#note_138"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">138</span></span></a> St. Thomas's Hospital, in Southwark,
+was originally dedicated to the murdered
+archbishop, but after its dissolution and subsequent
+restoration as one of the Royal Hospitals, its patron
+saint was no longer Thomas the Martyr, but Thomas
+the Apostle.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Charter of Henry II to the City of London.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Whilst the king and his chancellor were busy
+settling the kingdom, establishing a uniform administration
+of justice and system of revenue, and not only
+renewing but extending the form of government which
+had been instituted by Henry I, the citizens of London,
+availing themselves of the security afforded by a strong
+government, redoubled their energy in following commercial
+pursuits and succeeded in raising the city, as
+Fitz-Stephen has told us, to a pitch of prosperity far
+exceeding that of any other city in the world.</p>
+
+<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page058">[pg 058]</span><a name="Pg058" id="Pg058" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">They obtained a charter from Henry,<a id="noteref_139" name="noteref_139" href="#note_139"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">139</span></span></a> although
+of a more limited character than that granted to
+them by his grandfather. The later charter, for
+instance, although in the main lines following the
+older charter, makes no mention of Middlesex being
+let to ferm nor of any appointment of sheriff or justiciar
+being vested in the citizens. It appears as if
+Henry was determined to bring the citizens no less
+than the barons of the realm within more direct and
+immediate subservience to the crown. The concession
+made by the king's grandfather had been ignored by
+Stephen and the empress Matilda, each of whom in
+turn had granted the shrievalty of London and Middlesex
+to the Earl of Essex. For a time the appointment
+of sheriffs was lost to the citizens. Throughout
+the reigns of Henry II and his successor they were
+appointed by the crown. Richard's charter to the
+citizens makes no mention of the sheriffwick, nor
+is it mentioned in the first charter granted by John.
+When it was restored to the citizens (<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-variant: small-caps">A.D.</span></span> 1199), by
+John's second charter, the office of sheriff of London
+had lost much of its importance owing to the introduction
+of the communal system of municipal government
+under a mayor.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The Inquest of sheriffs, 1170.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">In the meantime the sheriffs of the counties, who
+had by reason of Henry's administrative reforms, risen
+to be officers of greater importance and wider jurisdiction,
+and who had taken advantage of their positions to
+oppress the people during the king's prolonged absence
+abroad, were also made to feel the power of the crown.
+A blow struck at the sheriffs was calculated to weaken<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page059">[pg 059]</span><a name="Pg059" id="Pg059" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc40" id="toc40"></a>
+the nobility and the larger landowners—the class from
+which it had been the custom hitherto to select these
+officers. Henry saw the advantage to be gained, and
+on his return to England in 1170 deposed most of the
+sheriffs and ordered a strict enquiry to be made, as to
+the extortions they had committed in his absence.
+Their places were filled for the most part by men of
+lower rank, and therefore likely to be more submissive.
+Some, however, were reinstated and became more cruel
+and extortionate than ever.<a id="noteref_140" name="noteref_140" href="#note_140"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">140</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The revolt of the barons, 1174.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The last fifteen years of Henry's life were full of
+domestic trouble. He had always found it an easier
+matter to rule his kingdom than his household. His
+sons were for ever thwarting his will and quarrelling
+with each other. It was his desire to secure the
+succession to the crown for his eldest son Henry, and
+to this end he had caused him to be crowned by the
+Archbishop of York (14th June, 1170), who was
+thereupon declared excommunicated by his brother
+of Canterbury. The son began to clamour for his
+inheritance whilst his father still lived, and appealed
+in 1173 to the French king, whose daughter he had
+married, to assist him in his unholy enterprise. Whilst
+Henry was engaged in defending his crown against
+his own son on the continent, the great barons of
+England rose in insurrection, and the king was obliged
+to hasten home, where he arrived in July, 1174. The
+rebellion was quickly put down, and the strife between
+king and nobles for a time ceased.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Disturbances in the city, 1174-1177.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">In the city there were occasional disturbances
+caused by the younger nobility—the young bloods of<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page060">[pg 060]</span><a name="Pg060" id="Pg060" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+the city<a id="noteref_141" name="noteref_141" href="#note_141"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">141</span></span></a>—who infested the streets at night, broke
+into the houses of the rich and committed every
+kind of excess. In 1177 the brother of the Earl
+of Ferrers was waylaid and killed, and for some time
+the streets were unsafe at night. The chronicler records
+a singular outrage perpetrated three years before, by
+these sprigs of nobility. They forcibly entered the
+house of a wealthy citizen whose name has not come
+down to us, he is simply styled the <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">pater-familias</span></span>.
+Of his courage we are left in no doubt, for we are
+told that he slipt on a coat of mail, armed his house-hold,
+and awaited the attack. He had not long to
+wait. The leader of the band—one Andrew Bucquinte
+soon made his appearance, and was met by
+a pan of hot coals. Swords were drawn on both
+sides and <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">pater-familias</span></span>, whose coat of mail served
+him well, succeeded in cutting off the right hand of
+his assailant. Upon the cry of thieves being raised,
+the delinquents took to their heels, leaving their
+leader a prisoner. The next day, being brought
+before the king's justiciar, he informed against his
+companions. This cowardly action on the part of
+Bucquinte led to many of them being taken, and
+among them one who is described by the chronicler
+as the noblest and wealthiest of London citizens, but
+to whom the chronicler gives no other name than
+"John, the old man" (<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Johannes Senex</span></span>). An offer was
+made to John to prove his innocence by what was
+known as the ordeal by water,<a id="noteref_142" name="noteref_142" href="#note_142"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">142</span></span></a> but the offer was<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page061">[pg 061]</span><a name="Pg061" id="Pg061" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc41" id="toc41"></a>
+declined, and he was eventually hanged. The whole
+story looks suspicious.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The last days of Henry II. 1177-1189.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Having settled the succession of the crown of
+England upon his eldest son, the king put his second
+son, Richard, into possession of the Duchy of Aquitaine,
+and provided for his third son, Geoffrey, by
+marriage with the heiress of Brittany. There was
+yet another son, John, who was too young to be provided
+for just now, and who being without any territory,
+assigned to him, acquired the name of Lackland.
+Both Richard and Geoffrey had taken the part of their
+brother Henry in 1173, and in 1177 the three brothers
+were again quarrelling with their father and with each
+other. After the deaths of Henry and Geoffrey, the
+quarrel was taken up by the surviving brothers,
+Richard and John.</p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">In all these—more or less—petty wars with his
+sons, the king had always to deal with the ruler of
+France. At last, in 1189, the loss of Le Mans—his
+own birth-place—and the unexpected discovery that
+his youngest and best beloved son, John, had turned
+traitor towards him, left the king nothing to live for,
+and after a few days suffering he died, ill and worn
+out, at Chinon.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Accession of Richard I, and administration of Longchamp, 1189-1190.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Richard had scarcely succeeded to the throne,
+before he set out on a crusade, leaving the government
+of his country in the hands of William Longchamp,
+Bishop of Ely, as chancellor.<a id="noteref_143" name="noteref_143" href="#note_143"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">143</span></span></a> With him was associated
+in the government, Hugh de Puiset, or Pudsey,
+Bishop of Durham, but Longchamp soon got the<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page062">[pg 062]</span><a name="Pg062" id="Pg062" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+supreme control of affairs into his own hands, and
+commenced to act in the most tyrannical fashion. He
+increased the security of the Tower of London, which
+had been committed to his charge, by surrounding it
+with a moat,<a id="noteref_144" name="noteref_144" href="#note_144"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">144</span></span></a> and having got himself nominated papal
+legate, made a progress through the country committing
+the greatest extortion.<a id="noteref_145" name="noteref_145" href="#note_145"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">145</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Longchamp opposed by Prince John, 1191.</span></div></div>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Arrival of Longchamp in London; the citizens divided, 7th October, 1191.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Report of the Chancellor's conduct having reached
+the ears of Richard, he despatched the Archbishop
+of Rouen to England with a new commission, but
+the worthy prelate on arrival (April, 1191), was afraid
+to present the commission, preferring to let matters
+take their course.<a id="noteref_146" name="noteref_146" href="#note_146"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">146</span></span></a> Already a fierce rivalry had
+sprung up between the chancellor and John, the
+king's brother, who, for purposes of his own, had espoused
+the cause of the oppressed. Popular feeling
+at length became so strong, that Longchamp feared
+to meet John and the bishops, and, instead of going
+to Reading, where his attendance was required, he
+hastened to London. Arriving there (7 Oct.), he
+called the citizens together in the Guildhall, and prayed
+them to uphold the King against John, whom he denounced
+as aiming plainly at the Crown. The leading
+men in the city at the time were Richard Fitz-Reiner
+and Henry de Cornhill. These took opposite sides,
+the former favouring John, whilst the latter took the
+side of the chancellor.<a id="noteref_147" name="noteref_147" href="#note_147"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">147</span></span></a> John's party proving the
+stronger of the two, Longchamp thought it safest to
+seek refuge in the Tower.<a id="noteref_148" name="noteref_148" href="#note_148"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">148</span></span></a></p>
+
+<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page063">[pg 063]</span><a name="Pg063" id="Pg063" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+
+<a name="toc42" id="toc42"></a>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">John admitted into the city.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">As soon as John found that the chancellor had
+gone to London instead of Reading, he too hastened
+thither. On his arrival he was welcomed and hospitably
+entertained by Richard Fitz-Reiner who gave
+him to understand on what terms he might expect the
+support of the city.<a id="noteref_149" name="noteref_149" href="#note_149"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">149</span></span></a> As to terms, John was ready to
+accede to any that might be proposed.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">A meeting of barons and citizens in St. Paul's, 8 Oct., 1191.</span></div></div>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Longchamp deposed and John recognised as head of the kingdom.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The next day (8 Oct.), a meeting of the barons
+of the realm, as well as of the citizens of London,
+was convened in St. Paul's Church, to consider the
+conduct of the chancellor, and it was thereupon
+decided that Longchamp should be deposed from
+office. The story, as told by different chroniclers,<a id="noteref_150" name="noteref_150" href="#note_150"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">150</span></span></a>
+varies in some particulars, but the main features are
+the same in all. The king's minister was set aside,
+John was recognised as the head of the kingdom,
+and new appointments made to judicial,
+fiscal, and military offices. The Archbishop of
+Rouen, who attended the council, seeing the turn
+affairs had taken, no longer hesitated to produce the
+letters under the king's sign manual appointing a new
+commission for the government of the kingdom.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">John grants or confirms to the citizens their commune.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The same day that witnessed the fall of Longchamp
+was also a memorable one in the annals of the
+City of London; for immediately after judgment had
+been passed on the chancellor, John and the assembled
+barons granted to the citizens "their commune,"
+swearing to preserve untouched the dignities of the
+city during the king's pleasure. The citizens on<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page064">[pg 064]</span><a name="Pg064" id="Pg064" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+their part swore fealty to King Richard, and declared
+their readiness to accept John as successor to the
+throne in the event of his brother dying childless.<a id="noteref_151" name="noteref_151" href="#note_151"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">151</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Change of name from port-reeve to mayor.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">This is the first public recognition of the citizens
+of London as a body corporate; but so far from
+granting to them something new, the very words
+<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">their</span></span> commune (<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">communam suam</span></span>) imply a commune
+of which they were <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">de facto</span></span>, if not <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">de jure</span></span> already in
+enjoyment. How long the commune may have been
+in existence, unauthorised by the crown, cannot be
+determined; but that the term <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">communio</span></span> in connection
+with the city's organization was known half a century
+before, we have already seen;<a id="noteref_152" name="noteref_152" href="#note_152"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">152</span></span></a> and, according to
+the opinion of Giraldus Cambrensis, there is no valid
+distinction between the words <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">communio</span></span>, <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">communa</span></span>
+and <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">communia</span></span>.<a id="noteref_153" name="noteref_153" href="#note_153"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">153</span></span></a> Bishop Stubbs, however, hesitates
+to translate <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">communio</span></span> as "commune," the latter being
+essentially a French term for a particular form of
+municipal government. He prefers to render it "commonalty,"
+"fraternity," or "franchise," although he
+goes so far as to allow that the term "suggests
+that the communal idea was already in existence as
+a basis of civic organization" in Stephen's reign, an
+idea which became fully developed in the succeeding<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page065">[pg 065]</span><a name="Pg065" id="Pg065" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc43" id="toc43"></a>
+reign.<a id="noteref_154" name="noteref_154" href="#note_154"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">154</span></span></a> He is also in favour of dating the foundation of
+the <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">communa</span></span> in London from this grant by John and
+the barons,<a id="noteref_155" name="noteref_155" href="#note_155"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">155</span></span></a> and in this view he is supported by
+Richard of Devizes, who distinctly states that the
+<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">communia</span></span> of London was instituted on that occasion,
+and that it was of such a character that neither
+King Richard nor Henry his father would have conceded
+it for a million marks of silver, and that a
+<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">communia</span></span> was in fact everything that was bad. It
+puffed up the people, it threatened the kingdom, and
+it emasculated the priesthood.<a id="noteref_156" name="noteref_156" href="#note_156"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">156</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Change of name from port-reeve to mayor.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">With the change from a shire organization to
+that of a French <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">commune</span></span>, whenever that happened
+to take place, there took place also a change in the
+chief governor of the city. The head of the city was
+no longer a Saxon "port-reeve" but a French "mayor,"
+the former officer continuing in all probability to perform
+the duties of a port-reeve or sheriff of a town
+in a modified form. From the time when this "civic
+revolution"<a id="noteref_157" name="noteref_157" href="#note_157"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">157</span></span></a> occurred, down to the present day, the
+sheriff's position has always been one of secondary
+importance, being himself subordinate to the mayor.</p>
+
+<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page066">[pg 066]</span><a name="Pg066" id="Pg066" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">When did the change take place?</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The earliest mention of a mayor of London in a
+formal document is said to occur in a writ of the reign
+of Henry II.<a id="noteref_158" name="noteref_158" href="#note_158"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">158</span></span></a> The popular opinion, however, is that
+a change in the name of the chief magistrate of the
+City of London took place at the accession of
+Richard I. What gave rise to this belief is hard to
+say, but it is not improbable that it arose from a statement
+to be found in an early manuscript record still
+preserved among the archives of the Corporation, and
+known as the <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Liber de Antiquis Legibus</span></span>.<a id="noteref_159" name="noteref_159" href="#note_159"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">159</span></span></a> The
+original portion of this manuscript purports to be a
+chronicle of mayors and sheriffs from 1188 down to
+1273, noticing briefly the chief events in each year,
+and referring to a few particulars relative to the year
+1274.</p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">After naming the sheriffs who were appointed at
+Michaelmas, <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-variant: small-caps">A.D.</span></span> 1188, "the first year of the reign of
+King Richard,"<a id="noteref_160" name="noteref_160" href="#note_160"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">160</span></span></a> it goes on to say that "in the
+same year Henry Fitz-Eylwin of Londenestane was
+made mayor of London, who was the first mayor of
+the city, and continued to be such mayor to the end
+of his life, that is to say, for nearly five and twenty
+years." That Henry Fitz-Eylwin was mayor in
+the first year of Richard's reign is stated no less
+than three times in the chronicle.<a id="noteref_161" name="noteref_161" href="#note_161"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">161</span></span></a></p>
+
+<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page067">[pg 067]</span><a name="Pg067" id="Pg067" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc44" id="toc44"></a>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Arnald Fitz-Thedmar, the compiler of the </span><span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-size: 80%; font-style: italic">Liber de Antiquis</span></span><span style="font-size: 80%">.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The compiler of the chronicle is supposed to have
+been Arnald or Arnulf Fitz-Thedmar,<a id="noteref_162" name="noteref_162" href="#note_162"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">162</span></span></a> an Alderman
+of London, although it is not known over which ward
+he presided. Particulars of his life are given in the
+volume itself, from which we gather that he was a
+grandson on the mother's side of Arnald de Grevingge<a id="noteref_163" name="noteref_163" href="#note_163"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">163</span></span></a>
+a citizen of Cologne; that his father's name was
+Thedmar, a native of Bremen; that he was born on
+the vigil of St. Lawrence [10 August] <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-variant: small-caps">A.D.</span></span> 1201, his
+mother being forewarned of the circumstances that
+would attend his birth in a manner familiar to biblical
+readers; that he was deprived of his aldermanry by
+the king, but was afterwards restored; that he became
+supporter of the king against Simon de Montfort and
+the barons, and that he was among those whom
+Thomas Fitz-Thomas, the leader of the democratic
+party and his followers, had "intended to slay"
+on the very day that news reached London of the
+battle of Evesham, which crushed the hopes of Montfort
+and his supporters. The date of his death cannot
+be precisely determined, but there can be but little
+doubt that it took place early in the third year of
+the reign of Edward the First, inasmuch as his
+will was proved and enrolled in the Court of
+Husting, London, held on Monday, the morrow of
+the Feast of St. Scolastica [10 Feb.] of that year
+(<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-variant: small-caps">A.D.</span></span> 1274-5).<a id="noteref_164" name="noteref_164" href="#note_164"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">164</span></span></a></p>
+
+<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page068">[pg 068]</span><a name="Pg068" id="Pg068" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Setting aside the statement—namely that mention
+is made of a mayor of London, in a document of the
+reign of Henry II—as wanting corroboration, the
+first instance known at the present day of any such
+official being named in a formal document occurs
+in 1193 when the Mayor of London appears among
+those who were appointed treasurers of Richard's
+ransom.<a id="noteref_165" name="noteref_165" href="#note_165"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">165</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The title of Mayor, first mentioned in a Royal Charter of 1202.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Richard's first charter to the City (23 April, 1194)<a id="noteref_166" name="noteref_166" href="#note_166"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">166</span></span></a>
+granted a few weeks after his return from abroad
+makes no mention of a mayor, nor does the title
+occur in any royal charter affecting the City until the
+year 1202, when John attempted to suppress the guild
+of weavers "at the request of our mayor and citizens
+of London." A few years later when John was ready
+to do anything and everything to avoid signing the
+Great Charter which the barons were forcing on him,
+he made a bid for the favour of the citizens by granting
+them the right to elect annually a mayor, and thus their
+autonomy was rendered complete.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Richard's return from captivity, March, 1194.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">When Richard recovered his liberty and returned
+to England he was heartily welcomed by all except
+his brother John. One of his first acts was to visit
+the City and return thanks for his safety at St. Paul's.<a id="noteref_167" name="noteref_167" href="#note_167"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">167</span></span></a>
+The City was on this occasion made to look its brightest,
+and the display of wealth astonished the foreigners
+in the King's suite, who had been led to believe that<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page069">[pg 069]</span><a name="Pg069" id="Pg069" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc45" id="toc45"></a>
+England had been brought to the lowest stage of
+poverty by payment of the King's ransom.<a id="noteref_168" name="noteref_168" href="#note_168"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">168</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Is crowned for the second time.</span></div></div>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The custom of the Mayor assisting the Chief Butler at coronation banquets.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">In order to wipe out the stain of his imprisonment,
+he thought fit to go through the ceremony of coronation
+for the second time. His first coronation had
+taken place at Westminster (3 Sept., 1189,) soon after
+his accession, and the citizens of London had duly
+performed a service at the coronation banquet—a
+service which even in those days was recognised as an
+"ancient service"—namely, that of assisting the chief
+butler, for which the mayor was customarily presented
+with a gold cup and ewer. The citizens of the rival
+city of Winchester performed on this occasion the
+lesser service of attending to the viands.<a id="noteref_169" name="noteref_169" href="#note_169"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">169</span></span></a></p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The second coronation taking place at Winchester
+and not at Westminster, the burgesses of the former
+city put in a claim to the more honourable service
+over the heads of the citizens of London, and the
+latter only succeeded in establishing their superior
+claim by a judicious bribe of 200 marks.<a id="noteref_170" name="noteref_170" href="#note_170"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">170</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Heavy taxation.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Richard was ever in want of money, and cared
+little by what means it was raised. He declared himself
+ready to sell London itself if a purchaser could
+be found.<a id="noteref_171" name="noteref_171" href="#note_171"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">171</span></span></a> The tax of Danegelt, from which the
+citizens of London had been specially exempted by<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page070">[pg 070]</span><a name="Pg070" id="Pg070" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+charter of Henry I, and which had ceased to be
+exacted under Henry II, mainly through the interposition
+of Thomas of London, was practically
+revived under a new name. The charter already
+mentioned as having been granted to the citizens by
+Richard after his return from captivity was probably
+purchased, for one of the king's regular methods of
+raising money was a lavish distribution of charters to
+boroughs, not from any love he had for municipal
+government, but in order to put money in his purse.
+As soon as Richard had collected all the money he
+could raise in England, he again left the country,
+never to return.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The rising in the city under Longbeard. 1196.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The pressure of taxation weighed heavily on the
+poor, and occasioned a rising in the city under the
+leadership of William Fitz-Osbert. The cry was that
+the rich were spared whilst the poor were called upon
+to pay everything.<a id="noteref_172" name="noteref_172" href="#note_172"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">172</span></span></a> Accounts of the commotion differ
+according as the writer favoured the autocratic or
+democratic side. One chronicler, for instance, finds
+fault with Fitz-Osbert's personal appearance, imputing
+his inordinate length of beard—he was known as
+"Longbeard"—to his desire for conspicuousness,
+and declares him to have been actuated by base
+motives.<a id="noteref_173" name="noteref_173" href="#note_173"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">173</span></span></a></p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Others describe him as a wealthy citizen of the
+best family, and yet as one who ever upheld the cause<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page071">[pg 071]</span><a name="Pg071" id="Pg071" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc46" id="toc46"></a>
+of the poor against the king's extortions.<a id="noteref_174" name="noteref_174" href="#note_174"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">174</span></span></a> Whatever
+may have been the true character of the man and the
+real motive of his action, it is certain that he had a
+large following. When Hubert Walter, the justiciar,
+sent to arrest him, "Longbeard" took refuge in the
+church of St. Mary-le-Bow. Thither he was followed
+by the king's officers—described by a not impartial
+chronicler as men devoid of truth and piety and
+enemies of the poor.<a id="noteref_175" name="noteref_175" href="#note_175"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">175</span></span></a>—who with the aid of fire
+and faggot soon compelled him to surrender. On his
+way to the Tower, he was struck at and wounded by
+one whose father (it was said) he had formerly killed;<a id="noteref_176" name="noteref_176" href="#note_176"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">176</span></span></a>
+but this again may or may not be the whole truth.
+A few days later he and a number of his associates
+were hanged.<a id="noteref_177" name="noteref_177" href="#note_177"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">177</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Richard's so-called second charter ordering the removal of wears in the Thames, 14 July, 1197.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Two years before his death at Chaluz, Richard,
+with the view of aiding commerce, caused the wears
+in the Thames to be removed, and forbade his wardens
+of the Tower to demand any more the toll that had
+been accustomed. The writ to this effect was dated
+from the Island of Andely or Les Andelys on the
+Seine, the 14th July, 1197, in the neighbourhood of
+that fortress which Richard had erected, and of
+which he was so proud—the Château Gaillard
+or "Saucy Castle," as he jestingly called it. The reputation
+which the castle enjoyed for impregnability<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page072">[pg 072]</span><a name="Pg072" id="Pg072" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+under Richard, was lost under his successor on the
+throne.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">First mention of a deliberative municipal body in the city, 1200.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Soon after John's accession we find what appears
+to be the first mention of a court of aldermen as a
+deliberative body. In the year 1200, writes Thedmar
+(himself an alderman), "were chosen five and twenty
+of the more discreet men of the city, and sworn to
+take counsel on behalf of the city, together with
+the mayor."<a id="noteref_178" name="noteref_178" href="#note_178"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">178</span></span></a> Just as in the constitution of the realm,
+the House of Lords can claim a greater antiquity than
+the House of Commons, so in the city—described by
+Lord Coke as <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">epitome totius regni</span></span>—the establishment
+of a court of aldermen preceded that of the common
+council.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The council held at St. Paul's, 25th Aug., 1213.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">When, after thirteen years of misgovernment,
+during which John had enraged the barons and
+excited general discontent by endless impositions,
+matters were brought to a climax by his submission
+to the pope, it was in the city of London that the
+first steps were taken by his subjects to recover their
+lost liberty. On the 25th August, 1213, a meeting of
+the clergy and barons was held in the church of
+St. Paul; a memorable meeting, and one that has
+been described as "a true parliament of the realm,
+though no king presided in it."<a id="noteref_179" name="noteref_179" href="#note_179"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">179</span></span></a> Stephen Langton,
+whose appointment as Archbishop of Canterbury
+had so raised John's ire, took the lead and produced
+to the assembly a copy of the Charter of Liberties,
+granted by Henry I, when that king undertook to
+put an end to the tyranny of William Rufus. If
+the barons so pleased, it might (he said) serve as a<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page073">[pg 073]</span><a name="Pg073" id="Pg073" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc47" id="toc47"></a>
+precedent. The charter having been then and there
+deliberately read, the barons unanimously declared
+that for such liberties they were ready to fight, and,
+if necessary, to die.<a id="noteref_180" name="noteref_180" href="#note_180"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">180</span></span></a></p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The clergy and people who had hitherto supported
+the king against the barons, having now engaged themselves
+to assist the barons against the tyranny of the
+king, John found himself with but one friend in the
+world, and that was the Pope. "Innocent's view of
+the situation was very simple," writes Dr. Gardiner,
+"John was to obey the Pope, and all John's subjects
+were to obey John." Within a few weeks of the
+council being held at St. Paul's, the same sacred
+edifice witnessed the formality of affixing a golden <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">bulla</span></span>
+to the deed—the detestable deed (<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">carta detestabilis</span></span>)—whereby
+John had in May last resigned the crown
+of England to the papal legate, and received it again
+as the Pope's feudatory.<a id="noteref_181" name="noteref_181" href="#note_181"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">181</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Meeting of the barons at Bury St. Edmunds, 1214.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">In the following year (1214), whilst the king was
+abroad, the barons met again at Bury St. Edmunds,
+and solemnly swore that if John any longer delayed
+restoring the laws and liberties of Henry the First,
+they would make war upon him. It was arranged
+that after Christmas they should go in a body and
+demand their rights, and that in the meantime they
+should provide themselves with horses and arms, with
+the view of bringing force to bear, in case of refusal.<a id="noteref_182" name="noteref_182" href="#note_182"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">182</span></span></a>
+The citizens at the same time took the opportunity of
+strengthening their defences by digging a foss on the
+further side of the city wall.<a id="noteref_183" name="noteref_183" href="#note_183"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">183</span></span></a></p>
+
+<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page074">[pg 074]</span><a name="Pg074" id="Pg074" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Open hostility between John and the barons, 1215.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Christmas came and a meeting between John
+and the barons took place in London at what was
+then known as the "New" Temple. The result,
+however, was unsatisfactory, and both parties prepared
+for an appeal to force, the barons choosing as their
+leader Robert Fitz-Walter, whom they dubbed
+"Marshal of the army of God and of Holy Church."<a id="noteref_184" name="noteref_184" href="#note_184"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">184</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Robert Fitz-Walter, castellain of London.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">This Fitz-Walter was Baron of Dunmow in Essex,
+the owner of Baynard's Castle in the City of London,
+and lord of a soke, which embraced the whole of the
+parish known as St. Andrew Castle Baynard. He
+moreover enjoyed the dignity of castellain and chief
+bannerer or banneret of London. The rights and
+privileges attaching to his soke and to his official
+position in time of peace were considerable, to judge
+from a claim to them put forward by his grandson
+in the year 1303. Upon making his appearance in
+the Court of Husting at the Guildhall, it was the
+duty of the Mayor, or other official holding the court,
+to rise and meet him and place him by his side.
+Again, if any traitor were taken within his soke or
+jurisdiction, it was his right to sentence him to death,
+the manner of death being that the convicted person
+should be tied to a post in the Thames at the Wood
+Wharf, and remain there during two tides and two
+ebbs.<a id="noteref_185" name="noteref_185" href="#note_185"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">185</span></span></a></p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">In later years, however, upon an enquiry being
+held by the Justiciars of the Iter (a° 14 Edward II,
+<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-variant: small-caps">a.d.</span></span> 1321), the claimant was obliged to acknowledge
+that he had disposed of Baynard's Castle in the time<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page075">[pg 075]</span><a name="Pg075" id="Pg075" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc48" id="toc48"></a>
+of Edward I, but had especially reserved to himself
+all rights attaching to the castle and barony, although
+he very considerately declared his willingness to forego
+the right and title enjoyed by his ancestor of drowning
+traitors at Wood Wharf.<a id="noteref_186" name="noteref_186" href="#note_186"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">186</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Duties of the castellain of the City in time of war.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">But it was in time of war that Fitz-Walter
+achieved for himself the greatest power and dignity.
+It then became the duty of the castellain to proceed
+to the great gate of St. Paul's attended by nineteen
+other knights, mounted and caparisoned, and having
+his banner, emblazoned with his arms, displayed before
+him. Immediately upon his arrival, the mayor, aldermen,
+and sheriffs, who awaited him, issued solemnly
+forth from the church, all arrayed in arms, the
+mayor bearing in his hand the city banner, the
+ground of which was bright vermilion or gules, with
+a figure of St. Paul, in gold, thereon, the head, feet,
+and hands of the saint being silver or argent, and
+in his right hand a sword.<a id="noteref_187" name="noteref_187" href="#note_187"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">187</span></span></a> The castellain, advancing
+to meet the mayor, informed him that he had
+come to do the service which the city had a right
+to demand at his hands, and thereupon the mayor
+placed the city's banner in his hands, and then, attending
+him back to the gate, presented him with a charger of
+the value of £20, its saddle emblazoned with the
+arms of Fitz-Walter, and its housing of cendal or silk,
+similarly enriched.</p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">A sum of £20 was at the same time handed to
+Fitz-Walter's chamberlain to defray the day's expenses.<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page076">[pg 076]</span><a name="Pg076" id="Pg076" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+Having mounted his charger, he bids the Mayor to
+choose a Marshal of the host of the City of London;
+and this being done, the communal or "mote-bell" is
+set ringing, and the whole party proceed to the Priory
+of Holy Trinity at Aldgate. There they dismount,
+and entering the Priory, concert measures together for
+the defence of the city. There is one other point
+worthy of remark, touching the office of chief banneret,
+and that is that on the occasion of any siege
+undertaken by the London forces, the castellain was
+to receive as his fee the niggardly sum of one hundred
+shillings for his trouble, and no more.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Feud between Fitz-Walter and King John.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">It is not improbable that Fitz-Walter's election
+as leader of the remonstrant barons was in some
+measure due to his official position in the city. It is
+also probable, as Mr. Riley has pointed out, that the
+unopposed admission of the barons into the city, on
+the 24th May, 1215, may have been facilitated by
+Fitz-Walter's connexion, as castellain, with the Priory
+of Holy Trinity, situate in the vicinity.</p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">But there were other reasons for selecting Fitz-Walter
+as their leader at this juncture. If the story
+be true, Fitz-Walter had good reason to be bitterly
+hostile to King John, for having caused his fair
+daughter Maude or Matilda to be poisoned, after
+having unsuccessfully made an attempt upon her
+chastity.<a id="noteref_188" name="noteref_188" href="#note_188"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">188</span></span></a> This is not the only crime of the kind laid
+to the charge of this monarch,<a id="noteref_189" name="noteref_189" href="#note_189"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">189</span></span></a> and there appears to
+be too much reason for believing most of the charges<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page077">[pg 077]</span><a name="Pg077" id="Pg077" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc49" id="toc49"></a>
+against him to be true. It is certain that Fitz-Walter
+was one of the first to entertain designs against John,
+and that he and Eustace de Vesci, on whose family
+the king is said to have put a similar affront, were
+forced to escape to France. The story how Fitz-Walter
+attracted John's notice by his prowess at a tournament
+in which he was engaged on the side of the French,
+and was restored to the King's favour and his own
+estates, is familiar to all.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The Barons admitted into the City, May, 1215.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">After a feeble attempt to capture Northampton,
+the barons, with Fitz-Walter at their head, accepted
+an invitation from the citizens of London to enter the
+city. They made their entry through Aldgate.<a id="noteref_190" name="noteref_190" href="#note_190"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">190</span></span></a></p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The concession which John had recently made to
+the citizens, viz.:—the right of annually electing their
+own mayor<a id="noteref_191" name="noteref_191" href="#note_191"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">191</span></span></a>—had failed to secure their allegiance.
+The city became thenceforth the headquarters of the
+barons,<a id="noteref_192" name="noteref_192" href="#note_192"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">192</span></span></a> and the adhesion of the Londoners was
+followed by so great a defection from the King's party
+(including among others that of Henry de Cornhill),
+that he was left without any power of resistance.<a id="noteref_193" name="noteref_193" href="#note_193"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">193</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The city and Magna Carta, 15th June, 1215.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The citizens met their reward for fidelity to the
+barons when John was brought to bay at Runnymede.
+In drafting the articles of the Great Charter the barons,
+mindful of their trusty allies, made provision for the
+preservation of the city's liberties, and the names of<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page078">[pg 078]</span><a name="Pg078" id="Pg078" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+Fitz-Walter and of the mayor of the city appear
+among those who were specially appointed to see that
+the terms of the charter were strictly carried out.<a id="noteref_194" name="noteref_194" href="#note_194"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">194</span></span></a></p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">By way of further security for the fulfilment of
+the articles of the charter the barons demanded and
+obtained the custody of the City of London, including
+the Tower, and they reserved to themselves the right
+of making war upon the king if he failed to keep his
+word. For a year or more the barons remained in
+the city, having entered into a mutual compact with
+the inhabitants to make no terms with the king without
+the consent of both parties.<a id="noteref_195" name="noteref_195" href="#note_195"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">195</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Open war between John and the barons.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The right of resistance thus established was soon
+to be carried into execution. Before the year was
+out, John had broken faith, and was besieging Rochester
+with the aid of mercenaries. An attempt to raise
+the siege failed, owing to the timidity (not to say
+cowardice) of Fitz-Walter, who, like the rest of the
+barons, was inclined to be indolent so soon as the
+struggle with the king was thought to have ended.<a id="noteref_196" name="noteref_196" href="#note_196"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">196</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">London under an interdict.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The Pope supported his vassal king. For a
+second time during John's reign London was placed
+under an interdict. The first occasion was in 1208,
+when the whole of England was put under an interdict,
+and for six years the nation was deprived of all
+religious rites saving the sacraments of baptism and
+extreme unction.<a id="noteref_197" name="noteref_197" href="#note_197"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">197</span></span></a> It was then the object of Innocent<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page079">[pg 079]</span><a name="Pg079" id="Pg079" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc50" id="toc50"></a>
+to stir up resistance against John by inflicting sufferings
+on the people, now his purpose was to punish
+the people for having risen against John.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The arrival of the Dauphin, May, 1216.</span></div></div>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Death of John, 19th October, 1216.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The barons saw no other course open to them
+but to invite Louis the Dauphin to come and undertake
+the government of the kingdom in the place of
+John. On the 21st May, 1216, Louis landed at
+Sandwich and came to London, where he was welcomed
+by the barons. Both barons and citizens paid
+him homage, whilst he, on his part, swore to restore
+to them their rights, to maintain such laws of the
+realm as were good, and to abolish those (if any)
+that were bad.<a id="noteref_198" name="noteref_198" href="#note_198"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">198</span></span></a> Suspicion, however, had been aroused
+against Louis by the confession of a French nobleman
+who had come over in his train, and who had solemnly
+declared on his deathbed that his master had sworn
+when once on the throne of England to banish all
+John's enemies.<a id="noteref_199" name="noteref_199" href="#note_199"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">199</span></span></a> Just when matters seemed to be
+approaching a crisis and the barons were wavering in
+their allegiance, John died (19th October, 1216).</p>
+</div>
+</div>
+
+<hr class="doublepage" /><div class="tei tei-div" style="margin-bottom: 5.00em; margin-top: 5.00em">
+<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page080">[pg 080]</span><a name="Pg080" id="Pg080" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+<a name="toc51" id="toc51"></a>
+<a name="pdf52" id="pdf52"></a>
+<h1 class="tei tei-head" style="text-align: left; margin-bottom: 3.46em; margin-top: 3.46em"><span style="font-size: 173%">CHAPTER IV.</span></h1>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-div" style="margin-bottom: 4.00em; margin-top: 4.00em">
+<h2 class="tei tei-head" style="text-align: left; margin-bottom: 2.88em; margin-top: 2.88em"></h2>
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The barons desert Louis.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Although London remained faithful to Louis after
+John's death, the barons began to desert him, one by
+one (<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">quasi stillatim</span></span>),<a id="noteref_200" name="noteref_200" href="#note_200"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">200</span></span></a> and to transfer their allegiance
+to John's eldest son, a boy of nine years of age, who
+had been crowned at Gloucester soon after his father's
+death, the disturbed state of the country not allowing
+of his coming to London for the ceremony.<a id="noteref_201" name="noteref_201" href="#note_201"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">201</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Defeat of Louis at Lincoln, 20th May, 1217.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">After his defeat at Lincoln (20th May, 1217), by
+William the Marshal, Earl of Pembroke, one of Henry's
+guardians, Louis beat a hasty retreat to London and
+wrote to his father, the French king, to send him
+military assistance, for without it he could neither
+fight nor get out of the country.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Fitz-Walter and Muntfichet made prisoners.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Among the prisoners taken at Lincoln were
+Robert Fitz-Walter, and a neighbour of his in the
+ward of Castle Baynard, Richard de Muntfichet, who,
+like Fitz-Walter, had also suffered banishment in 1213.
+The tower or castle of Muntfichet lay a little to the
+west of Baynard's Castle, and was made over in 1276
+by Gregory de Rokesle, the mayor, and citizens of
+London to the Archbishop of Canterbury, for the
+purpose of erecting a new house for the Dominican
+or Black Friars, in place of their old house in Holborn.<a id="noteref_202" name="noteref_202" href="#note_202"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">202</span></span></a>
+We hear little of Fitz-Walter after this, beyond the<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page081">[pg 081]</span><a name="Pg081" id="Pg081" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc53" id="toc53"></a>
+facts that he soon afterwards obtained his freedom,
+that he went on a crusade, and continued a loyal
+subject to Henry until his death in 1235. He is said
+to have been in the habit of wearing a precious stone
+suspended from his neck by way of a charm, which
+at his last moments he asked his wife to remove in
+order that he might die the easier.<a id="noteref_203" name="noteref_203" href="#note_203"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">203</span></span></a></p>
+
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">London invested by the Earl Marshal.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">A French fleet which had been despatched in
+answer to Louis was defeated off Dover by Hubert de
+Burgh, who had gallantly held that town for John,
+and continued to hold it now for Henry. London
+itself was invested by the Marshal, and threatened
+with starvation; but before matters came to extremes,
+Louis intimated his willingness to come to terms.<a id="noteref_204" name="noteref_204" href="#note_204"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">204</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Treaty of Lambeth, 11th Sept., 1217.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">A meeting was held on the 11th of September
+(some say at Kingston,<a id="noteref_205" name="noteref_205" href="#note_205"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">205</span></span></a> others at Staines<a id="noteref_206" name="noteref_206" href="#note_206"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">206</span></span></a>), and a
+peace concluded.<a id="noteref_207" name="noteref_207" href="#note_207"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">207</span></span></a> Louis swore fealty to the Pope
+and the Roman Church, for which he was absolved
+from the ban of excommunication that had been
+passed on him, and surrendered all the castles and
+towns he had taken during the war. He, further,
+promised to use his influence to obtain the restoration
+to England of the possessions that had been lost
+beyond the sea.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Departure of Louis after borrowing a sum of money from the citizens.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Henry, on his part, swore to preserve to the barons
+and the rest of the kingdom, all those liberties which
+they had succeeded in obtaining from John. Everything
+being thus amicably settled, Louis went to London,<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page082">[pg 082]</span><a name="Pg082" id="Pg082" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+and, after borrowing a large sum of money from his
+former trusty supporters, betook himself back to his
+native country.<a id="noteref_208" name="noteref_208" href="#note_208"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">208</span></span></a> The general pardon which was
+granted by the young king extended to the Londoners,
+who became reconciled and received back their lands,<a id="noteref_209" name="noteref_209" href="#note_209"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">209</span></span></a>
+but did not extend to the clergy, who were left to the
+tender mercy of the papal legate.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Attempt by Constantine Fitz-Athulf or Olaf, to raise a cry in favour of Louis, 1222.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">For some years to come there remained a party in
+the city who cherished the memory of Louis, and the
+cry of "Mountjoy!" the war-cry of the French king—was
+sufficient to cause a riot as late as 1222, when
+Constantine Fitz-Athulf or Olaf, an ex-sheriff of
+London, raised the cry at a tournament, in order to
+test the feeling of the populace towards Louis. Any
+serious results that might have arisen were promptly
+prevented by Hubert de Burgh, the justiciar, who very
+quickly sought out the ringleader, and incontinently
+caused him and two of his followers to be hanged at
+the Elms in Smithfield. Whilst the halter was round
+his neck, Fitz-Athulf offered 15,000 marks of silver for
+his life. The offer was declined. He was not to be
+allowed another chance of stirring up sedition in the
+city.<a id="noteref_210" name="noteref_210" href="#note_210"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">210</span></span></a></p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">A more circumstantial account of this event is
+given us by another chronicler,<a id="noteref_211" name="noteref_211" href="#note_211"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">211</span></span></a> who relates that the<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page083">[pg 083]</span><a name="Pg083" id="Pg083" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc54" id="toc54"></a>
+wrestling match which took place on the festival of
+Saint James (25th July),—the same as that mentioned
+by Matthew Paris—was held at Queen Matilda's
+hospital in the suburbs,<a id="noteref_212" name="noteref_212" href="#note_212"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">212</span></span></a> and was a match between
+the citizens of London and those outside; that victory
+declared itself in favour of the Londoners, and that their
+opponents, and among them the steward of the Abbot
+of Westminster, thereupon left in high dudgeon. With
+thoughts of revenge in their hearts, the latter caused
+invitations to be issued for another match to be held
+at Westminster, on the following feast of Saint Peter
+ad Vincula (1st August).</p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">It was at this second and later match that the
+trouble began. The steward was not content with
+collecting the most powerful athletes he could find,
+but caused them to seize weapons and to attack the
+defenceless citizens who had come to take part in the
+games. The Londoners hurried home, bleeding with
+wounds, and immediately took counsel as to what
+was best to be done. Serlo, the mercer, who had
+held the office of mayor of the city for the past five
+years, and was of a peaceable disposition, suggested
+referring the matter to the abbot; and it was then that
+Constantine, who had a large following, advocated an
+attack upon the houses of the abbot and of his steward.
+No sooner said than done, and many houses had already
+suffered before the justiciar appeared upon the scene
+with a large force. As to the seizure of Constantine
+and his subsequent execution, the chroniclers agree.</p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Constantine's fellow citizens were very indignant
+at the indecent haste with which the justiciar had<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page084">[pg 084]</span><a name="Pg084" id="Pg084" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+caused his execution to be carried out, and did not
+fail to bring the matter up in judgment against him,
+when, some ten years later, Hubert de Burgh himself
+fell into disgrace.<a id="noteref_213" name="noteref_213" href="#note_213"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">213</span></span></a> The result was, that the
+justiciar took refuge in the Priory of Merton. When
+the citizens received the king's orders to follow
+him there, and to take him dead or alive, they
+obeyed with unconcealed joy. They allowed little
+time to elapse, but set out at once, 20,000 strong,
+ready to tear him limb from limb; but luckily they
+were stopped in time by another message from the
+king, and Hubert obtained a respite.<a id="noteref_214" name="noteref_214" href="#note_214"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">214</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The foreign element in the country.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">At the time of Constantine's execution, there was
+real danger to be anticipated from raising the cry in
+favour of any foreigner. The land was already
+swarming with foreigners, and in that very year
+(viz. 1222), the archbishop had been under the necessity
+of summoning a council of bishops and nobles to
+be held in London, owing to dissensions that had
+arisen between the Earl of Chester, William of Salisbury,
+the king's uncle, and Hubert de Burgh, and to a
+rumour that had got abroad, that foreigners were
+inciting the Earl of Chester to raise an insurrection.<a id="noteref_215" name="noteref_215" href="#note_215"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">215</span></span></a></p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">A few years later, the country was over-run by a
+brood of Italian usurers who battened on the inhabitants,
+reducing many to beggary. When attempts<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page085">[pg 085]</span><a name="Pg085" id="Pg085" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc55" id="toc55"></a>
+were made to rid the city of these pests, they
+sheltered themselves under the protection of the
+Pope.<a id="noteref_216" name="noteref_216" href="#note_216"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">216</span></span></a></p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Throughout the reign of Henry III, there was
+one continuous struggle against foreign dominion,
+either secular or ecclesiastical. In this struggle,
+none took a more active part than the citizens of
+London, and "when [in 1247], the nobles, clergy, and
+people of England put forth their famous letter
+denouncing the wrongs which England suffered at
+the hands of the Roman bishop, it was with the seal
+of the city of London, as the centre of national life
+that the national protest was made."<a id="noteref_217" name="noteref_217" href="#note_217"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">217</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%"> The city's struggle against encroachment by the king.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Side by side with this struggle another was being
+carried on, a struggle for the liberty of the subject
+against the tyranny and rapacity of the king. More
+especially was this the case with the city. Henry
+was for ever invading the rights and liberties of the
+citizens. Thus in 1239, he insisted upon their admitting
+to the shrievalty one who had already been
+dismissed from that office for irregular conduct, and
+because they refused to forego their chartered right of
+election and to appoint the king's nominee, the city
+was deprived of a mayor for three months and more.<a id="noteref_218" name="noteref_218" href="#note_218"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">218</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The city "taken into the king's hand" on the most frivolous pretences.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The substitution of a <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">custos</span></span> or warden appointed
+by the king for a mayor elected by the citizens, and
+of bailiffs for sheriffs,—a procedure known as "taking
+the city into the king's hands,"—was frequently<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page086">[pg 086]</span><a name="Pg086" id="Pg086" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+resorted to both by Henry and his successors, and
+notably by Edward I, in whose reign the city was
+deprived of its mayor, and remained under government
+of a <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">custos</span></span> for thirteen consecutive years
+(1285-1298).<a id="noteref_219" name="noteref_219" href="#note_219"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">219</span></span></a></p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Any pretext was sufficient for Henry's purpose.
+If the citizens harboured a foreigner without warrant,
+not only was the city taken into the king's hand, but
+the citizens were fined £1,000,<a id="noteref_220" name="noteref_220" href="#note_220"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">220</span></span></a> a sum equal to at
+least £20,000 at the present day. A widow brings an
+action for a third part of her late husband's goods in
+addition to her dower. The case goes against her in
+the Court of Husting, and is heard on appeal before
+the king's justiciar sitting at St. Martin's-le-Grand.
+The verdict is not set aside, but some flaw is discovered
+in the mode of procedure; the explanation
+of the citizens is deemed insufficient, and the mayor
+and sheriffs are forthwith deposed, to be reinstated
+only on the understanding that they will so far forego
+their chartered right—viz.: of not impleading nor being
+impleaded without the walls of their city—as to consent
+to attend the king's court at Westminster, where
+finally, and after considerable delay, they are acquitted.<a id="noteref_221" name="noteref_221" href="#note_221"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">221</span></span></a></p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Take another instance. The king had shown an
+interest in the Abbey Church of Westminster, and
+had caused a new chapel to be built in 1220, he himself
+laying the first stone. Thirty years later, or
+thereabouts, he made certain concessions to the Abbot
+of Westminster—what they were we are not told—but
+it is certain that they, in some way or other,<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page087">[pg 087]</span><a name="Pg087" id="Pg087" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc56" id="toc56"></a>
+infringed the rights of the citizens of London in the
+County of Middlesex. The king promised to compensate
+them for the loss they would sustain; but
+failing to get their consent by fair promises, he
+resorted to his favourite measure of taking the city
+into his own hands. For fifteen years the dispute
+between the citizens and the Abbot as to their
+respective rights in the County of Middlesex was kept
+alive, and was at last determined by a verdict given
+by the barons of the exchequer, which completely
+justified<a id="noteref_222" name="noteref_222" href="#note_222"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">222</span></span></a> the attitude taken up by the citizens of
+London.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Money extorted from the Jews as well as the citizens for
+payment of the king's tradesmen.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">In 1230 he extorted a large sum of money from
+the citizens at a time when he was meditating an
+expedition to the continent for the purpose of
+recovering lost possessions. The citizens, however,
+were not the only sufferers. The religious houses
+were heavily mulcted, as were also the Jews, who,
+whether they would or not, were made to give up
+one third of their chattels.<a id="noteref_223" name="noteref_223" href="#note_223"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">223</span></span></a> Again in 1244, the
+citizens of London and the Jews were made to open
+their purse-strings that the king might the better be
+able to pay his wine merchant, his wax chandler, and
+his tailor; but even then his creditors were not paid
+in full.<a id="noteref_224" name="noteref_224" href="#note_224"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">224</span></span></a></p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Only once does it appear that the king's conscience
+pricked him for the extortions he was continually
+practising on the citizens. This was in 1250, when<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page088">[pg 088]</span><a name="Pg088" id="Pg088" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+he called the citizens together at Westminster, and
+begged their forgiveness for all trespasses, extortions
+of goods and victuals under the name of "prises," and
+for forced loans or talliages. Seeing no other way
+out of it, the citizens acceded to his request.<a id="noteref_225" name="noteref_225" href="#note_225"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">225</span></span></a> As
+recently as the previous year (1249) he had exacted
+from them a sum of £2,000.<a id="noteref_226" name="noteref_226" href="#note_226"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">226</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The coronation of king and queen, 1236.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Henry had been crowned at Gloucester soon after
+his accession.<a id="noteref_227" name="noteref_227" href="#note_227"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">227</span></span></a> Nevertheless he was again crowned—this
+time in London in 1236, after his marriage with
+Eleanor of Provence. The city excelled itself in doing
+honour to the king and queen as they passed on their
+way to Westminster: but the joy of the citizens was
+damped by the king refusing to allow Andrew Bukerel
+the mayor to perform the customary service of
+assisting the chief butler at the coronation banquet.
+It was not a time for raising questions of etiquette, so
+the mayor pocketed the affront, preferring to settle
+the question of the city's rights at some more convenient
+time, rather than damp the general joy of the
+company by pressing his claim.<a id="noteref_228" name="noteref_228" href="#note_228"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">228</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The king's custom of formally taking leave of his citizens
+before going abroad.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Yet, notwithstanding his manifestly unjust treatment
+of the citizens of London, and the cynical
+contempt with which he looked upon their ancient
+claim to the title of "barons," he usually went through
+the formality of taking leave of them at Paul's Cross<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page089">[pg 089]</span><a name="Pg089" id="Pg089" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc57" id="toc57"></a>
+or at Westminster, before crossing the sea to Gascony<a id="noteref_229" name="noteref_229" href="#note_229"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">229</span></span></a>
+and was not above making use of them when compelled
+to sell his plate and jewels to satisfy his debts. In
+1252, he even went so far as to grant them a charter
+of liberties, but for this concession the citizens had to
+pay 500 marks.<a id="noteref_230" name="noteref_230" href="#note_230"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">230</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The Mad Parliament, 11th June, 1258.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">It is scarcely to be wondered at if, when the
+crisis arrived, and king and barons found themselves
+in avowed hostility, the citizens of London joined the
+popular cause. By the month of June, 1258, the
+barons had gained their first victory over Henry.
+He was forced to accept the Provisions of Oxford,
+passed by the Mad Parliament,<a id="noteref_231" name="noteref_231" href="#note_231"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">231</span></span></a> as it came to be called
+in derision. The Tower of London was transferred
+to the custody of the barons, and they were for the
+future to appoint the justiciar. Towards the end of
+July, a deputation from the barons waited upon the
+mayor and citizens to learn if they approved of the
+agreement that had been made with the king.<a id="noteref_232" name="noteref_232" href="#note_232"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">232</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The Citizens throw in their lot with the Barons.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The mayor, aldermen, and citizens, after a hasty
+consultation, gave their assent, but with the reservation
+"saving unto them all their liberties and customs,"
+and the city's common seal was set to the so-called
+"charter" which the deputation had brought.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Hugh Bigod the baron's justiciar in the city, 1258.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">It was not long before the city discovered that
+the barons were as little likely to respect its liberties
+as the king himself. Hugh Bigod, whom they had<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page090">[pg 090]</span><a name="Pg090" id="Pg090" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+appointed justiciar gave offence by the way he
+exercised his office. In spite of all remonstrance he
+insisted upon sitting at the Guildhall to hear pleas,
+a jurisdiction which belonged exclusively to the
+sheriffs. He summoned the bakers of the city to
+appear before him, and those who were convicted of
+selling bread under weight he punished, in a way that
+was not in conformity with city usage.<a id="noteref_233" name="noteref_233" href="#note_233"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">233</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The king takes leave of the citizens. November, 1259.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">In November of the following year (1259), Henry
+took occasion of his departure for the continent to
+make some popular concessions to the citizens. He
+appeared at a Folkmote, which was being held at
+Paul's Cross, and, before taking leave, he announced
+that in future the citizens should be allowed to plead
+their own cases (without employing legal aid) in all
+the courts of the city, excepting in pleas of the
+crown, pleas of land, and of wrongful distress. On
+the same day John Mansel who had been one of
+the king's justiciars in 1257, when the city was "taken
+into the king's hand," and Fitz-Thedmar had been
+indicted and deprived of his aldermanry for upholding
+the privileges of the citizens<a id="noteref_234" name="noteref_234" href="#note_234"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">234</span></span></a>—publicly acknowledged
+on the king's behalf the injustice of Fitz-Thedmar's
+indictment, and announced that Henry not only
+recalled him to favour, but commanded that he should
+be restored to his former position.<a id="noteref_235" name="noteref_235" href="#note_235"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">235</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The king's return from abroad, April, 1260.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">During the king's absence abroad, the barons'
+cause was materially strengthened by the support
+afforded Simon de Montfort, Earl of Leicester, by
+the king's son. Upon hearing of the defection
+of his son, Henry hurried back to England.<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page091">[pg 091]</span><a name="Pg091" id="Pg091" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc58" id="toc58"></a>
+A consultation took place in the city as to the attitude
+which the citizens ought to take up, with the result
+that when Henry appeared (April, 1260), both he and
+the Earl of Gloucester were admitted into the city,
+whilst the Earl of Leicester and "Sir Edward," as
+the chronicler styles the king's son, had to find
+accommodation in the suburbs.<a id="noteref_236" name="noteref_236" href="#note_236"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">236</span></span></a></p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Henry was now master of the situation. The
+city was his, and he determined that it should remain
+so. Strict watch was kept over the gates, which for
+the most part, were kept shut night and day in order
+to prevent surprise. Every inhabitant of the age of
+twelve years and upwards was called upon to take an
+oath of allegiance before the alderman of his ward,
+and those of maturer age were bound to provide
+themselves with arms. The king, who now ruled
+again in his own way, stirred the anger of the barons,
+by presuming to appoint Philip Basset, his chief
+justiciar, without first asking their assent; and the
+barons retaliated by removing the king's sheriffs, and
+appointing "wardens of the counties" in their stead.<a id="noteref_237" name="noteref_237" href="#note_237"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">237</span></span></a>
+In June 1261, Henry produced a Bull of Alexander IV,
+annulling the Provisions of Oxford, and freeing him
+from his oath.<a id="noteref_238" name="noteref_238" href="#note_238"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">238</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The king summoned to observe the Provisions of Oxford. 1263.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">For eighteen months the king reigned supreme.
+The barons could do nothing, and the Earl of Leicester,
+finding their cause hopeless, withdrew in August (1261)
+to France, and remained there until the spring of
+1263, when he returned as the unquestioned head of<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page092">[pg 092]</span><a name="Pg092" id="Pg092" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+the baronial party, to take up arms against the king.
+The citizens professed loyalty to Henry, who was residing
+in the Tower, and bound themselves by oath to
+acknowledge his son Edward as heir to the crown.<a id="noteref_239" name="noteref_239" href="#note_239"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">239</span></span></a>
+At Whitsuntide, the barons sent a letter to the king
+requiring him to observe the Provisions of Oxford,
+and shortly afterwards, addressed another letter to the
+citizens "desiring to be certified by them whether
+they would observe the said ordinances and statutes
+made to the honour of God in fealty to his lordship
+the king, and to his advantage of all the realm, or
+would, in preference, adhere to those who wished
+to infringe the same."<a id="noteref_240" name="noteref_240" href="#note_240"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">240</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Arrangements made between the king, the barons, and
+the city, July, 1263.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Before sending a reply, the citizens had an interview
+with the king in the Tower, to whom they
+showed the barons' letter. The result was, that
+Henry availed himself of their services to mediate
+between him and the barons. A deputation of citizens
+accordingly travelled to Dover, where an understanding
+was arrived at between the hostile parties.
+The citizens were prepared to support the barons,
+subject to their fealty to the king and saving their
+own liberties; whilst the king promised to dismiss his
+foreign supporters—the real cause of all the mischief.
+Hugh le Despenser, whom Henry had deposed, was
+again installed justiciar of all England in the Tower;
+and the king and his family left the city for Westminster,
+the day after the barons entered it. "Thus
+was a league made between the barons and the
+citizens with this reservation—'saving fealty to his
+lordship the king.'"<a id="noteref_241" name="noteref_241" href="#note_241"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">241</span></span></a></p>
+
+<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page093">[pg 093]</span><a name="Pg093" id="Pg093" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc59" id="toc59"></a>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Organization of the Craft Guilds under Fitz-Thomas
+the Mayor. 1262.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Whilst the commons of England were thus
+winning their way to liberty, the commons of the city
+were engaged in a similar struggle with the aristocratic
+element of the municipal government. The craft
+guilds cried out against the exclusiveness of the more
+wealthy and aristocratic trade guilds, the members of
+which monopolized the city's rule. They found an
+able champion of their cause in the person of Thomas
+Fitz-Thomas, the mayor for the time being (1261-1265).
+The mayor's action in the matter disgusted
+Fitz-Thedmar, the city alderman and chronicler, who
+complains that he "so pampered the city populace,"
+that they styled themselves the "commons of the
+city," and had obtained the first voice in the city.
+The mayor would ask them their will as to whether
+this or that thing should be done; and if they
+answered "ya" "ya," it was done, without consulting
+the aldermen or chief citizens, whose very existence
+was ignored.<a id="noteref_242" name="noteref_242" href="#note_242"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">242</span></span></a> It is not surprising that, under a mayor
+so thoroughly in sympathy with the people, opportunity
+was taken by the citizens to rectify abuses from
+which they had so long suffered. Their trade had
+been prejudiced by the number of foreigners which
+the king had introduced into the city, and accordingly
+we read of an attack made on the houses of some
+French merchants. Rights of way which had been
+stopped up, were again opened, and where land
+had been illegally built upon, the buildings were
+abated.</p>
+
+<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page094">[pg 094]</span><a name="Pg094" id="Pg094" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The chronicler complains of the populace acting
+"like so many justices itinerant." It was in vain that
+the king addressed a letter to the mayor and citizens,
+setting forth that the dissensions between himself and
+the barons had been settled, and commanding his peace
+to be kept as well within the city as without.<a id="noteref_243" name="noteref_243" href="#note_243"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">243</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The movement favoured by the barons.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The popular movement received every encouragement
+from the barons. Let those who were disaffected
+put their complaints into writing, and the barons
+would see that the matter was duly laid before the
+king, and that the city's liberties were not diminished.
+Fortified with such promises, the mayor set to work
+at once to organize the craft guilds. Ordinances
+were drawn up "abominations" Fitz-Thedmar calls
+them<a id="noteref_244" name="noteref_244" href="#note_244"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">244</span></span></a> for the amelioration of the members, and
+everything was done that could be done to better
+their condition.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The queen insulted by the citizens, 13th July, 1263.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">A few days before Henry and the barons had
+concluded a temporary peace, the citizens had been
+greatly excited by an action of the king's son. Henry
+was, as usual, in want of money, and had failed to raise
+a loan in the city. His son came to his assistance and
+seized the money and jewels lying at the Temple (29th
+June). The citizens were so exasperated at this high-handed
+proceeding on the part of the prince that they
+vented their spleen on the queen, and pelted her with
+mud and stones, calling her all kinds of opprobrious
+names, as she attempted to pass in her barge under
+London Bridge on her way from the Tower to
+Windsor. (13th July).<a id="noteref_245" name="noteref_245" href="#note_245"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">245</span></span></a></p>
+
+<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page095">[pg 095]</span><a name="Pg095" id="Pg095" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc60" id="toc60"></a>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Such conduct very naturally incensed the king
+and his son against the citizens. Henry was angry
+with them, moreover, for having admitted the barons
+contrary to his express orders.<a id="noteref_246" name="noteref_246" href="#note_246"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">246</span></span></a> It is not surprising,
+therefore, that when Fitz-Thomas presented himself
+before the Barons of the Exchequer to be admitted to
+the mayoralty for the third year in succession, they
+refused to admit him by the king's orders, Henry
+"being for many reasons greatly moved to anger
+against the city."<a id="noteref_247" name="noteref_247" href="#note_247"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">247</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The Mise of Amiens. 23rd Jan., 1264</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Before the end of the year (1263), both king and
+barons agreed to submit to the arbitration of the
+King of France. The award known as the Mise of
+Amien—from the place whence it was issue—which
+Louis made on the 23rd Jan., 1264, proved of so one-sided
+a character that the barons had no alternative but
+to reject it. However unjustifiable such repudiation
+on the part of the barons may have been from a moral
+point of view, it was a matter of necessity. Many
+of them, moreover, including those of the Cinque Ports,
+as well as the Londoners, and nearly all the middle
+class of England, had not been parties to the arbitration,
+and therefore, were not pledged to accept the
+award.<a id="noteref_248" name="noteref_248" href="#note_248"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">248</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">League between the citizens of London and the barons.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The citizens and the barons now entered into
+solemn covenant to stand by each other "saving however
+their fealty to the king." A constable and a
+marshal were appointed to command the city force,
+which was to stand prepared night and day to muster
+at the sound of the great bell of St. Paul's. The<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page096">[pg 096]</span><a name="Pg096" id="Pg096" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+manor of Isleworth, belonging to Richard, King of
+the Romans, the king's brother, was laid waste, and
+Rochester besieged, but, disturbances again breaking
+out at home, Leicester had to hurry back to restore
+order and prevent the city being betrayed to the
+king's son.<a id="noteref_249" name="noteref_249" href="#note_249"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">249</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The Battle of Lewes, 14th May, 1264.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">In May the earl set out again with a force of
+Londoners<a id="noteref_250" name="noteref_250" href="#note_250"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">250</span></span></a> to meet the king, who was threatening
+the Cinque Ports. In the early morning of the 14th
+he came upon the royal army at Lewes. Prince
+Edward himself led the charge against the Londoners—he
+had not forgotten the insult they had recently
+offered to his mother—and succeeded in driving them
+off the field. They scarcely indeed awaited his onslaught,
+so unpractised in warfare had they become of
+recent years, but turned their backs and sped away
+towards London, followed in hot pursuit by Edward.
+When he returned he found that, owing to his absence,
+the day was lost, and that his father and brother had
+been made prisoners.<a id="noteref_251" name="noteref_251" href="#note_251"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">251</span></span></a> In spite of his own success, he
+also had to surrender.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The Mise of Lewes.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The barons returned to the city in triumph, bringing
+the king and Richard, king of the Romans, in their
+train. Edward had been placed in custody in Dover
+Castle, pending negotiations. Henry was lodged in
+the Bishop's Palace, whilst Richard was committed to<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page097">[pg 097]</span><a name="Pg097" id="Pg097" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc61" id="toc61"></a>
+the Tower. An agreement was drawn up which
+secured the safety of the king, and left all matters
+of dispute to be again referred to arbitration.<a id="noteref_252" name="noteref_252" href="#note_252"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">252</span></span></a> This
+treaty formed the basis of a new system of government,
+and led to the institution of Simon de Montfort's
+famous Parliament.</p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The short respite—for it proved to be no more—from
+civil war was welcomed by the Londoners. The
+city had been drained of a large part of its population
+in order to increase the Earl of Leicester's army, and
+business had been seriously disturbed. For the past
+year no Court of Husting had been held, and therefore
+no wills or testaments had received probate; whilst all
+pleas of land, except trespass, had to stand over until
+the country became more settled.<a id="noteref_253" name="noteref_253" href="#note_253"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">253</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Meeting of Simon de Montfort's Parliament, 20th Jan., 1265.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The parliament which Leicester summoned to
+meet on the 20th January, 1265, marked a new era
+in parliamentary representation. It was the first
+parliament in which the merchant and the trader
+were invited to take their seats beside the baron and
+bishop. Not only were the shires to send up two
+representatives, but each borough and town were to
+be similarly privileged.<a id="noteref_254" name="noteref_254" href="#note_254"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">254</span></span></a></p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Terms of reconciliation between king and barons
+were arranged, and once more the mayor and aldermen
+did fealty to Henry in person in St. Paul's church.
+Fitz-Thomas, who for the fourth time was mayor, was
+determined to lose nothing of his character for independence;
+"My lord," said he, when taking the oath,<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page098">[pg 098]</span><a name="Pg098" id="Pg098" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+so long as you are willing to be to us a good king and
+lord, we will be to you faithful and true."<a id="noteref_255" name="noteref_255" href="#note_255"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">255</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Jealousy between the Earls of Leicester and Gloucester.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Peace was not destined to last long. Dissensions
+quickly broke out between Gilbert, Earl of Gloucester,
+and Simon de Montfort, owing in a great measure to
+jealousy. Gloucester insisted that the Mise of Lewes
+and the Provisions of Oxford had not been properly
+observed, hinting unmistakably at the foreign birth
+and extraction of his rival. Endeavours were made
+to arrange matters by arbitration, but in vain; and by
+Whitsuntide the two earls were in open hostility.
+Gloucester was joined by Edward, who had succeeded
+by a ruse in escaping from Hereford, where he was
+detained in honourable captivity.<a id="noteref_256" name="noteref_256" href="#note_256"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">256</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The Battle of Evesham, 4th August, 1265.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">With their combined forces they fell on Earl
+Simon at Evesham and utterly defeated him (4 Aug.).
+Simon himself was killed, and his body barbarously
+mutilated.<a id="noteref_257" name="noteref_257" href="#note_257"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">257</span></span></a> The king, who was in the earl's camp,
+only saved himself by crying out in time "I am Henry
+of Winchester, your king." Whilst the battle was
+raging the city was visited with a terrible thunderstorm—an
+evil omen of the future.</p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">If credit be given to every statement made by
+the city alderman and chronicler, Fitz-Thedmar, we
+must believe that the battle of Evesham took place
+just in time to prevent a wholesale massacre of the
+best and foremost men of the city, including the
+chronicler himself, which was being contrived by the<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page099">[pg 099]</span><a name="Pg099" id="Pg099" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc62" id="toc62"></a>
+mayor, the popular Thomas Fitz-Thomas, the no
+less popular Thomas de Piwelesdon or Puleston, and
+others.<a id="noteref_258" name="noteref_258" href="#note_258"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">258</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The city taken into the king's hands from 1265 to 1270.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The citizens of London were soon to experience
+the change that had taken place in the state of affairs.
+The day after Michaelmas, the mayor and citizens
+proceeded to Westminster to present the new sheriffs
+to the Barons of the Exchequer; but finding no one
+there, they returned home. The truth was that the
+king had resorted to his favourite measure of taking
+the city into his own hands for its adherence to the
+late Earl of Leicester; and for five years it so
+remained, being governed by a <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">custos</span></span> or warden
+appointed by the king, in the place of a mayor elected
+by the citizens.<a id="noteref_259" name="noteref_259" href="#note_259"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">259</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Threat of the king to subdue the city by force.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">There had been some talk of the king meditating
+an attack upon the city, and treating its inhabitants as
+avowed enemies.<a id="noteref_260" name="noteref_260" href="#note_260"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">260</span></span></a> The very threat of such a proceeding
+was sufficient to throw the city into the
+utmost state of confusion. Some there were "fools
+and evil-minded persons," as our chronicler describes
+them—who favoured resisting force by force; but the
+"most discreet men" of the city, and those who had
+joined the Earl under compulsion, would have none
+of it, preferring to solicit the king's favour through
+the mediation of men of the religious orders. Henry<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page100">[pg 100]</span><a name="Pg100" id="Pg100" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+still remained unmoved, and the fear of the citizens
+increased to such an extent that it was finally resolved
+that the citizens as a body should make humble
+submission to the king; and that the same should
+be forwarded to him at Windsor under the common
+seal of the city. Whilst the deputation bearing this
+document was on its way it was met by Sir Roger
+de Leiburn, who turned it back on the ground that he
+himself was on his way to the city for the express
+purpose of arranging terms of submission.<a id="noteref_261" name="noteref_261" href="#note_261"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">261</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Fitz-Thomas and others summoned to Windsor.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">That night Sir Roger lodged at the Tower, and
+the next morning he went to Barking Church, on the
+confines of the city,<a id="noteref_262" name="noteref_262" href="#note_262"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">262</span></span></a> where he was met by the mayor
+and a "countless multitude" of the citizens. The
+advice he had to give the citizens was that if they
+wished to be reconciled to the king, they would have
+to submit their lives and property unreservedly to his
+will. Letters patent were drawn up to that effect
+under the common seal, and taken by Sir Roger
+himself to Windsor. The citizens had not long to
+wait for an answer. The king's first demand was
+the removal of the posts and chains which had been
+set up in the streets as a means of defence. His next
+was that the mayor—his old antagonist Fitz-Thomas—and
+the principal men of the city should come in
+person to him at Windsor, under letters of safe conduct.
+Trusting to the royal word, the mayor and about
+forty of the more substantial men of the city proceeded
+to Windsor, there to await a conference with
+the king. To their great surprise, the whole of the<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page101">[pg 101]</span><a name="Pg101" id="Pg101" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc63" id="toc63"></a>
+party were made to pass the night in the Castle keep.
+They were practically treated as prisoners.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The fate of Fitz-Thomas unknown.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Some regained their liberty, but of Fitz-Thomas
+nothing more is heard. From the time that he entered
+Windsor Castle, he disappears from public view. That
+he was alive in May, 1266, at least in the belief of his
+fellow-citizens, is shown by their cry for the release
+of him and his companions "who are at Windleshores."
+They would again have made him Mayor, if they
+could have had their own way. "We will have no
+one for mayor" (they cried) "save only Thomas
+Fitz-Thomas."<a id="noteref_263" name="noteref_263" href="#note_263"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">263</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The city taken into the king's hand, 1265.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">In the meantime the king had himself gone to
+London and confiscated the property of more than
+sixty of the citizens, driving them out of their house
+and home. Hugh Fitz-Otes, the Constable of the
+Tower, had been appointed warden of the city in the
+place of the imprisoned mayor; bailiffs had been
+substituted for sheriffs, and the citizens made to pay a
+fine of 20,000 marks. Then, and only then, did the
+king consent to grant their pardon.<a id="noteref_264" name="noteref_264" href="#note_264"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">264</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">London Bridge bestowed on the queen.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Queen Eleanor, who had interceded for the Londoners,<a id="noteref_265" name="noteref_265" href="#note_265"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">265</span></span></a>
+was presented by the king with the custody
+of London Bridge, the issues and profits of which
+she was allowed to enjoy. She allowed the bridge,
+however, to fall into such decay, that she thought she<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page102">[pg 102]</span><a name="Pg102" id="Pg102" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+could not do better than restore it to its rightful
+owners. This she accordingly did in 1271, but soon
+afterwards changed her mind, and again took the
+bridge into her charge.<a id="noteref_266" name="noteref_266" href="#note_266"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">266</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The Earl of Gloucester master of the city, April, 1267.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">At Easter, 1267, the Earl of Gloucester, who had
+constituted himself the avowed champion of those
+who had suffered forfeiture, and become "disinherited"
+for the part they had taken with the Earl of Leicester,
+sought admission to the city. The citizens hesitated
+to receive him within their gates, although according
+to some, he was armed with letters patent of the
+king addressed to the citizens on his behalf.<a id="noteref_267" name="noteref_267" href="#note_267"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">267</span></span></a> Under
+pretence of holding a conference with the papal legate
+at the Church of Holy Trinity, Aldgate, he gained
+admission for himself and followers: and there he
+remained, having made himself master of the city's
+gates.<a id="noteref_268" name="noteref_268" href="#note_268"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">268</span></span></a> Thereupon many citizens left the city, fearing
+the wrath of the king, and once more the city was in
+the hands of the populace. The leading citizens were
+placed under a guard; the aldermen and bailiffs were
+deposed to make way for the earl's own supporters,
+and, for better security, a covered way of timber was
+made from the city to the Tower.<a id="noteref_269" name="noteref_269" href="#note_269"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">269</span></span></a></p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Whatever may have been the actual part played
+by the legate in admitting the disinherited into the
+city, he soon showed his dissatisfaction at the state of
+things within its walls, by leaving the Tower, to join
+<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page103">[pg 103]</span><a name="Pg103" id="Pg103" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc64" id="toc64"></a>
+the king at Ham, and placing the disinherited—"the
+enemies of the king"—under an interdict.<a id="noteref_270" name="noteref_270" href="#note_270"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">270</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Terms arranged between Gloucester and the king, 16th June, 1267.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">At length the king and the Earl of Gloucester
+came to terms (16 June). The earl was to have his
+property restored to him, and the city was to be
+forgiven all trespasses committed against the king
+since the time that the earl made his sojourn within
+its walls. The earl gave surety in 10,000 marks for
+keeping the peace, and the citizens paid the king of
+the Romans 1,000 marks for damages they had
+committed three years before in his manor of
+Isleworth.<a id="noteref_271" name="noteref_271" href="#note_271"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">271</span></span></a> Not a word about the imprisoned mayor,
+Fitz-Thomas!</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Charter of Henry III, 26th March, 1268.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The king's letters patent granting forgiveness to
+the citizens for harbouring the Earl of Gloucester<a id="noteref_272" name="noteref_272" href="#note_272"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">272</span></span></a>
+were followed in the spring of the following year
+by another charter to the city.<a id="noteref_273" name="noteref_273" href="#note_273"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">273</span></span></a> But inasmuch as this
+charter did not restore the mayoralty, the citizens
+had little cause to be thankful and looked upon it as
+only an instalment of favours to come.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The city recovers its rights to elect mayor and sheriffs, 1270.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Towards the end of this year or early in the next
+(1269), the city was committed by the king to his
+son Edward, who ruled it by deputy, Sir Hugh Fitz-Otes
+being again appointed Constable of the Tower,
+and warden of the city.<a id="noteref_274" name="noteref_274" href="#note_274"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">274</span></span></a> It was through the good<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page104">[pg 104]</span><a name="Pg104" id="Pg104" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+offices of the prince, that the citizens eventually
+recovered the right to elect their mayor, so long withheld.
+"About the same time, that is to say,
+Pentecost, 1270," writes Fitz-Thedmar, "at the
+instance of Sir Edward, his lordship the king
+granted unto the citizens that they might have a
+mayor from among themselves in such form as they
+were wont to elect him."<a id="noteref_275" name="noteref_275" href="#note_275"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">275</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The sheriff's ferm increased to £400.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">He further allowed them to choose two sheriffs
+who should discharge the duties of sheriff, (<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">qui
+tenerent vicecomitatem</span></span>) of the City and Middlesex,
+as formerly; but instead of the yearly ferm of
+£300 in pure silver (<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">sterlingorum blancorum</span></span>),
+formerly paid for Middlesex, they were thenceforth to
+pay an annual rent of £400 in money counted
+(<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">sterlingorum computatorum</span></span>.)<a id="noteref_276" name="noteref_276" href="#note_276"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">276</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Election of John Adrian, Mayor, 1270.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The citizens lost no time in exercising their
+recovered rights. Their choice fell upon John Adrian
+for the mayoralty, whilst Philip le Taillour and
+Walter le Poter were elected sheriffs. After they
+had been severally admitted into office—the mayor
+before the king himself on Wednesday, the 16th July,
+and the sheriffs at the Exchequer two days later—the
+king restored the city's charters, and the citizens
+acknowledged the royal favour by a gift of 100 marks
+to the king, and 500 marks to Prince Edward, who
+had proved so good a friend to them, and who was
+about to set out for the Holy Land.<a id="noteref_277" name="noteref_277" href="#note_277"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">277</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Election of Hervy, 1272, disputed.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Adrian was succeeded in the mayoralty by
+Walter Hervy, who had already served as sheriff or<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page105">[pg 105]</span><a name="Pg105" id="Pg105" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc65" id="toc65"></a>
+bailiff on two occasions, once by royal appointment.
+He made himself so popular with the "commons" of
+the city during his year of office, that when October,
+1272, came round and the aldermen and more
+"discreet" citizens were in favour of electing Philip
+le Taillour as his successor, the commons or "mob of
+the city"—as the chronicler prefers to style them—cried
+out, "Nay, nay, we will have no one for mayor
+but Walter Hervi."<a id="noteref_278" name="noteref_278" href="#note_278"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">278</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Appeal made by both parties to the king's council.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The aldermen finding themselves in a minority,
+appealed to the king and council at Westminster.
+Hervy did the same, being accompanied to Westminster
+by a large number of supporters, who took
+the opportunity of the aldermen laying their case
+before the council to insist loudly, as they waited in
+the adjacent hall, upon their own right of election
+and their choice of Hervy. It was feared that the
+noise might disturb the king who was confined to his
+bed with what proved to be his last illness. All
+parties was therefore dismissed, injunction being laid
+upon Hervy not to appear again with such a following,
+but to come with only ten or a dozen supporters
+at the most.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The king's illness and death, 16th November, 1272.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Hervy paid no heed to this warning, but continued
+to present himself at Westminster every day
+for a fortnight, accompanied by his supporters in full
+force, expecting an answer to be given by the council.
+At length the council resolved to submit the whole
+question to arbitration, the city in the meanwhile
+being placed in the custody of a warden. Before the
+arbitrators got to work, the king died (16 Nov.),<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page106">[pg 106]</span><a name="Pg106" id="Pg106" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+and rather than the city should continue to be
+disturbed at such a crisis, the aldermen agreed to a
+compromise, and Hervy was allowed to be mayor
+for one year more.<a id="noteref_279" name="noteref_279" href="#note_279"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">279</span></span></a></p>
+</div>
+</div>
+
+<hr class="doublepage" /><div class="tei tei-div" style="margin-bottom: 5.00em; margin-top: 5.00em">
+<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page107">[pg 107]</span><a name="Pg107" id="Pg107" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+<a name="toc66" id="toc66"></a>
+<a name="pdf67" id="pdf67"></a>
+<h1 class="tei tei-head" style="text-align: left; margin-bottom: 3.46em; margin-top: 3.46em"><span style="font-size: 173%">CHAPTER V.</span></h1>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-div" style="margin-bottom: 4.00em; margin-top: 4.00em">
+<a name="toc68" id="toc68"></a><h2 class="tei tei-head" style="text-align: left; margin-bottom: 2.88em; margin-top: 2.88em"></h2>
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Fitz-Thedmar's prejudice against Hervy.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Although the aldermen had been prevailed upon
+to give their assent to Hervy's election to the
+mayoralty, his democratic tendencies made him an
+object of dislike, more especially to Fitz-Thomas.
+When, therefore, that chronicler records that throughout
+Hervy's year of office he did not allow any
+pleading in the Husting for Pleas of Land except very
+rarely, for the reason that the mayor himself was
+defendant in a suit brought against him by Isabella
+Bukerel,<a id="noteref_280" name="noteref_280" href="#note_280"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">280</span></span></a> we hesitate to place implicit belief in his
+statement.<a id="noteref_281" name="noteref_281" href="#note_281"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">281</span></span></a> We are inclined, moreover, to give less
+credit to anything that Fitz-Thedmar may say against
+the mayor when we bear in mind that the former
+had a personal grievance against the latter.<a id="noteref_282" name="noteref_282" href="#note_282"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">282</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Hervy's so-called "charter" to the guilds.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Hervy was a worthy successor to Fitz-Thomas,
+and, under his government, the craft guilds improved
+their position. Fresh ordinances for the regulation of
+various crafts were drawn up, and to these the mayor,
+on his own responsibility, attached the city seal.<a id="noteref_283" name="noteref_283" href="#note_283"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">283</span></span></a><span class="tei tei-pb" id="page108">[pg 108]</span><a name="Pg108" id="Pg108" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+When Hervy's year of office expired—these so-called
+"charters" were called in question as having been
+unauthorised by the aldermen of the city and as
+tending to favour the richer members of the guilds
+to the prejudice of the poorer. After a "wordy and
+most abusive dispute" carried on in the Guildhall
+between the ex-mayor and Gregory de Rokesley who
+acted as spokesman for the body of aldermen, Hervy
+left the hall and summoned the craft-guilds to meet
+him in Cheapside. There he told them that it was the
+wish of Henry le Galeys (or Waleys) the mayor and
+others to infringe their charters, but that if they could
+stand by him he would maintain those charters in all
+their integrity.</p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Fearing lest a riot might follow, the chancellor—Walter
+de Merton, through whose mediation Hervy
+had been at last accepted as mayor by the aldermen—ordered
+his arrest. This was on the 20th December,
+1273. Hervy was, accordingly, attached but
+released on bail, and early in the following January
+(1274), his charters were duly examined in the
+Husting before all the people, and declared void.
+Thenceforth, every man was to enjoy the utmost
+freedom in following his calling, always provided that
+his work was good and lawful.<a id="noteref_284" name="noteref_284" href="#note_284"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">284</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Dispute between Hervy and the Mayor, 1274.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">When the mayor removed certain butchers' and
+fishmongers' stalls from Cheapside, in order that the
+main thoroughfare of the city might present a creditable
+appearance to the king on his return from abroad,
+the owners of the stalls, who complained of being
+disturbed in their freeholds—"having given to the
+sheriff a great sum of money for the same"—found<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page109">[pg 109]</span><a name="Pg109" id="Pg109" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc69" id="toc69"></a>
+a champion in Hervy. Their cause was pleaded at
+the Guildhall, and such "a wordy strife" arose
+between Hervy and the mayor, that the session had
+to be broken up, and Hervy's conduct was reported to
+the king's council. The next day, upon the resumption
+of the session, a certain roll was produced and
+publicly read, in which "the presumptuous acts and
+injuries, of most notorious character" which Hervy
+was alleged to have committed during his mayoralty
+were set forth at length.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Charges against Hervy for acts done during his mayoralty.</span></div></div>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Is discharged from his aldermanry.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The charges against him were eight in number,
+of which some at least appear to be in the last degree
+frivolous. He had on a certain occasion borne false
+witness; he had failed on another occasion to attend
+at Westminster upon a summons; he had failed to
+observe all the assizes made by the aldermen and had
+allowed ale to be sold in his ward for three halfpence
+a gallon; he had taken bribes for allowing corn and
+wine to be taken out of the city for sale, and he had
+misappropriated a sum of money which had been
+raised for a special purpose. Such was the general
+run of the charges brought against him, in addition to
+which were the charges of having permitted the
+guilds to make new statutes to their own advantage
+and to the loss of the city and all the realm, as
+already narrated, and of having procured "certain
+persons of the city, of Stebney, of Stratford, and of
+Hakeneye" to make an unjust complaint against the
+mayor, "who had warranty sufficient for what he had
+done, namely, the council of his lordship the king."
+This last charge had reference to the recent removal
+of tradesmen's stalls from Chepe. No defence
+appears to have been allowed Hervy. The charges<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page110">[pg 110]</span><a name="Pg110" id="Pg110" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+were read, and he was then and there declared to be
+"judicially degraded from his aldermanry and for
+ever excluded from the council of the city"; a precept
+being at the same time issued for the immediate
+election of a successor, to be presented at the next
+court.<a id="noteref_285" name="noteref_285" href="#note_285"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">285</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The after-results of the policy of Hervy and Fitz-Thomas.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">From this time forward nothing more is heard
+of Hervy. The same cloud envelopes his later
+history, that gathered round the last years of his
+predecessor and political tutor Thomas Fitz-Thomas.
+The misfortune of both of these men was that they
+lived before their age. Their works bore fruit long
+after they had departed. The trade or craft guilds, as
+distinguished from the more wealthy and influential
+mercantile guilds, eventually played an important
+part in the city. Under Edward II, no stranger
+could obtain the freedom of the city (without which,
+he could do little or nothing), unless he became a
+member of one of these guilds, or sought the suffrages
+of the commonalty of the city, before admission to
+the freedom in the Court of Husting.<a id="noteref_286" name="noteref_286" href="#note_286"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">286</span></span></a></p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The normal and more expeditious way of obtaining
+the freedom was thus through a guild. If Hervy
+or Fitz-Thomas lived till the year 1319, when the
+Ordinances just cited received the king's sanction, he
+must have felt that the struggle he had made to raise
+the lesser guilds had not been in vain. The mercantile
+element in the city, which had formerly overcome<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page111">[pg 111]</span><a name="Pg111" id="Pg111" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc70" id="toc70"></a>
+the aristocratic element,<a id="noteref_287" name="noteref_287" href="#note_287"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">287</span></span></a> in its turn gave way to the
+numerical superiority and influence of the craft and
+manufacturing element. Hence it was that in 1376—when
+the number of trade or craft guilds in the
+city compared with the larger mercantile guilds was
+as forty to eight—the guilds succeeded in wresting for
+a while from the wards the right of electing members
+of the city's council.<a id="noteref_288" name="noteref_288" href="#note_288"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">288</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Arrival of Edward I, in London, 18th August, 1274.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">In the meantime, King Edward I, arrived in
+London (18th August, 1274), where he was heartily
+welcomed by the citizens,<a id="noteref_289" name="noteref_289" href="#note_289"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">289</span></span></a> and was crowned the
+following day. He had expected to have returned
+much earlier, and had addressed a letter to the mayor,
+sheriffs, and commonalty of the City of London,
+eighteen months before, informing them of his purposed
+speedy return, and of his wishes that they
+should endeavour to preserve the peace of the realm.<a id="noteref_290" name="noteref_290" href="#note_290"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">290</span></span></a>
+He was, however, detained in France.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Edward's hereditary right to the crown clearly acknowledged.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Edward's right to succeed his father was never
+disputed. For the first time in the annals of England,
+a new king commences to reign immediately after the
+death of his predecessor. <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Le Roi est mort, vive le</span></span><span class="tei tei-pb" id="page112">[pg 112]</span><a name="Pg112" id="Pg112" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Roi</span></span>! Within a week of his father's decease, a writ
+was issued, in which the hereditary right of succession
+was distinctly asserted as forming Edward's title to
+the crown.<a id="noteref_291" name="noteref_291" href="#note_291"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">291</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Four citizens to be sent to confer with Edward at Paris,
+3rd April, 1274.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Before setting sail for England, Edward despatched
+a letter (3rd April), "to his well-beloved, the mayor,
+barons, and reputable men of London," thanking
+them for the preparations he understood they were
+making for the ceremony of his coronation, and bidding
+them send a deputation of four of the more discreet
+of the citizens, to him at Paris, for the purpose
+of a special conference.<a id="noteref_292" name="noteref_292" href="#note_292"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">292</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The object of the conference.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The difficulty which gave rise to this conference
+and to the signal mark of distinction bestowed upon
+the citizens of London, proved to be of a commercial
+character, and, as such, one upon which the
+opinions of the leading merchants of London would
+be of especial value. Ever since the year 1270, the
+commercial relationship between England and Flanders
+had been strained. The Countess of Flanders
+had thought fit to lay hands upon the wool and other
+merchandise belonging to English merchants found
+within her dominions, and to appropriate the same to
+her own use. Edward's predecessor on the throne
+had thereupon issued a writ to the mayor and sheriffs
+of London, forbidding in future the export of wool to
+any parts beyond sea whatsoever,<a id="noteref_293" name="noteref_293" href="#note_293"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">293</span></span></a> but this measure
+not having the desired effect, he shortly afterwards
+had recourse to reprisals.</p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">On the 28th June, 1270, a writ had been issued to
+the same parties ordering them to seize the goods of<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page113">[pg 113]</span><a name="Pg113" id="Pg113" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc71" id="toc71"></a>
+all Flemings, Hainaulters, and other subjects of the
+Countess, for the purpose of satisfying the claims of
+English merchants; and all subjects of the Countess,
+except those workmen who had received express permission
+to come to England for the purpose of making
+cloth, and those who had taken to themselves English
+wives, and had obtained a domicile in this country, were
+to quit the realm by a certain date.<a id="noteref_294" name="noteref_294" href="#note_294"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">294</span></span></a> Those Flemings
+who neglected this injunction were to be seized and
+kept in custody until further orders, and the same
+measures were to be taken with those who harboured
+them. In the meantime, an inquisition was ordered
+to be made as to the amount and value of the goods
+seized by the Countess, and the English merchants were
+to lodge their respective claims for compensation.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Interruption of trade between England and Flanders.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The interruption of trade between England—at
+that time the chief wool-exporting country in the
+world—and Flanders where the cloth-working industry
+especially flourished, caused much tribulation;
+and the King of France, the Duke of Brabant, and
+other foreign potentates, whose subjects began to feel
+the effect of this commercial disturbance, addressed
+letters to the King of England, requesting that their
+merchants might enter his realm and stay, and traffic
+there as formerly. They had never offended the King
+or his people; the Countess of Flanders was the sole
+offender, and she alone ought to be punished. The
+matter having received due consideration, the embargo
+on the export of wool was taken off with respect to
+all countries, except Flanders, with the proviso that
+no wool should be exported out of the kingdom without
+special license from the king.<a id="noteref_295" name="noteref_295" href="#note_295"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">295</span></span></a></p>
+
+<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page114">[pg 114]</span><a name="Pg114" id="Pg114" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">By the month of October, 1271, the inquisitors,
+who had been appointed to appraise the goods and
+chattels of Flemings in England, were able to report
+to parliament that their value amounted to £8,000
+"together with the king's debt," whilst the value of
+merchandise belonging to English merchants and seized
+by the countess amounted to £7,000, besides chattels
+of other merchants. Parliament again sat in January
+of the new year to consider the claims of English
+merchants, when those whose goods had been taken
+in Flanders, "and the Londoners more especially,"
+appeared in person. Each stated the amount of his
+loss and the amount of goods belonging to Flemings
+which he had in hand, and a balance was struck. An
+inquisition was, at the same time, taken in each of
+the city wards, as to the number of merchants who
+bought, sold, exchanged, or harboured the goods of
+persons belonging to the dominion of the Countess;
+and also as to who had taken wools out of England
+to the parts beyond the sea, contrary to the king's
+prohibition.<a id="noteref_296" name="noteref_296" href="#note_296"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">296</span></span></a> Many Flemings, still lurking in the city,
+were arrested, and only liberated on condition they
+abjured the realm so long as the dispute between
+England and Flanders should continue. Nearly six
+months elapsed before any further steps were taken by
+either party in the strife. The Countess then showed
+signs of giving way. Envoys from her arrived in
+England. She was willing to make satisfaction to all
+English merchants for the losses they had sustained,
+but this was to be subject to the condition that the
+king should bind himself to discharge certain alleged
+debts, which had been the cause of all the mischief from<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page115">[pg 115]</span><a name="Pg115" id="Pg115" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc72" id="toc72"></a>
+the outset, within a fixed time. In the event of the
+king failing to discharge these claims, the justice of
+which he never recognised, the Countess was to be
+allowed to distrain all persons coming into her country
+from England by their bodies and their goods,
+until satisfaction should be made for arrears. This
+haughty message only made matters worse. The king
+and his council became indignant, and contemptuously
+dismissed the envoys, commanding them to leave
+England within three days on peril of life and limb.<a id="noteref_297" name="noteref_297" href="#note_297"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">297</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Writ for the expulsion of all Flemings, 8th Sept., 1273.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Time went on; Henry died, and before his son
+Edward arrived in England from the Holy Land to
+take up the reins of government, his chancellor,
+Walter de Merton, had caused a proclamation to be
+made throughout the city, forbidding any Fleming to
+enter the kingdom, under penalty of forfeiture of
+person and goods. The proclamation was more than
+ordinarily stringent, for it went on to say that if perchance
+any individual had received special permission
+from the late king to sojourn and to trade within the
+realm, such permission was no longer to hold good,
+but the foreigner was to pack up his merchandise,
+collect his debts, and leave the country by Christmas,
+1273, at the latest.<a id="noteref_298" name="noteref_298" href="#note_298"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">298</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Negotiations opened with Edward at Paris for peace with
+Flanders.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The Countess had probably hoped that a change
+of monarch on the English throne would have
+favoured her cause. This proclamation was sufficient
+to show her the character of the king with whom she
+had in future to deal, and destroyed any hope she
+may have entertained in this direction. She therefore
+took the opportunity of Edward's passing through
+Paris to London, to open negotiations for the purpose<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page116">[pg 116]</span><a name="Pg116" id="Pg116" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+of restoring peace between England and Flanders;
+and it was to assist the king in conducting these
+negotiations, that he had summoned a deputation of
+citizens of London to meet him at Paris.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Particulars of the four citizens sent to confer with the king at Paris.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The choice of the citizens fell upon Henry le
+Waleys, their mayor for the time being, one who was
+known almost as well in France as in the city of
+London, if we may judge from the fact of his filling
+the office of Mayor of Bordeaux in the following year.
+With him were chosen Gregory de Rokesley who,
+besides being a large dealer in wool, was also a goldsmith
+and financier, and as such was shortly to be
+appointed master of the exchange throughout
+England;<a id="noteref_299" name="noteref_299" href="#note_299"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">299</span></span></a> John Horn, whose name bespeaks his
+Flemish origin,<a id="noteref_300" name="noteref_300" href="#note_300"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">300</span></span></a> and who may on that account have
+been appointed, as one who was intimate with both
+sides of the question under discussion; and Luke de
+Batencurt, also of foreign extraction, who was one of
+the Sheriffs of London this same year.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Peace concluded between England and Flanders, July, 1274.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">These four accordingly set out to confer with the
+king at Paris, having previously seen to the appointment
+of wardens over the city, and of magistrates to
+determine complaints which might arise at the fair to
+be held at St. Botolph's, or Boston, in Lincolnshire,
+during their absence.<a id="noteref_301" name="noteref_301" href="#note_301"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">301</span></span></a> The deputation were absent<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page117">[pg 117]</span><a name="Pg117" id="Pg117" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc73" id="toc73"></a>
+a month. On the 19th July, Gregory de Rokesle and
+certain others whose names are not mentioned again
+set out in compliance with orders received from the
+king; the object of their journey being, as we are
+expressly told, to treat of peace between the king and
+the Countess of Flanders at Montreuil.<a id="noteref_302" name="noteref_302" href="#note_302"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">302</span></span></a> A month
+later Edward himself was in England.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Strong Government of the city under Edward I.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The king ruled the city, as indeed he ruled the
+rest of the kingdom, with a strong hand. Londoners
+had already experienced the force of his arm and his
+ability in the field, when he scattered them at Lewes;
+they were now to experience the benefit of his powers
+of organization in time of peace. Fitz-Thedmar's
+chronicle now fails us, but we have a new source of
+information in the letter books<a id="noteref_303" name="noteref_303" href="#note_303"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">303</span></span></a> of the Corporation.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The necessity for an immediate supply of money.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The first and the most pressing difficulty which
+presented itself to Edward, was the re-organization
+of finance. Without money the barons could not be
+kept within legitimate bounds. Having won their
+cause against the usurpations of the crown, they
+began to turn their arms upon each other, and it
+required Edward's strong hand not only to impose
+order upon his unruly nobles, but also, to bring<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page118">[pg 118]</span><a name="Pg118" id="Pg118" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+Scotland and Wales into submission. The country
+was flooded with clipt coin. This was called in, and
+new money minted at the Tower, under the supervision
+of Gregory de Rokesley as Master of the
+Exchange.<a id="noteref_304" name="noteref_304" href="#note_304"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">304</span></span></a> Parliament made large grants to the
+king; and he further increased his resources by imposing
+knighthood upon all freeholders of estates
+worth £20 a year.<a id="noteref_305" name="noteref_305" href="#note_305"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">305</span></span></a> When the Welsh war was
+renewed in 1282, the city sent him 6,000 marks by
+the hands of Waleys and Rokesley.<a id="noteref_306" name="noteref_306" href="#note_306"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">306</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The so-called Parliament at Shrewsbury. 1283.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">In 1283 an extraordinary assembly—styled a
+parliament by some chroniclers—was summoned to
+meet at Shrewsbury to attend the trial of David,
+brother of Llewelyn, Prince of Wales. To this so-called
+parliament the city sent no less than six
+representatives, viz.: Henry le Waleys, the mayor,
+Gregory de Rokesley, Philip Cissor, or the tailor,
+Ralph Crepyn, Joce le Acatour, or merchant, and
+John de Gisors.<a id="noteref_307" name="noteref_307" href="#note_307"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">307</span></span></a> Their names are worthy of record,
+inasmuch as they are the first known representatives
+of the city in any assembly deserving the name of a
+parliament, the names of those attending Simon de
+Montfort's parliament not having been transmitted to
+us. David was convicted and barbarously executed,
+his head being afterwards carried to London, and set
+up on the Tower, where his brother's head, with a
+mock crown of ivy, had recently been placed.<a id="noteref_308" name="noteref_308" href="#note_308"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">308</span></span></a></p>
+
+<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page119">[pg 119]</span><a name="Pg119" id="Pg119" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc74" id="toc74"></a>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Ralph Crepyn and Laurence Duket.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Of Ralph Crepyn, one of the city's representatives
+at Shrewsbury, a tragic story is told. Meeting, one
+day, Laurence Duket, his rival in the affections of a
+woman known as "Alice atte Bowe," the two came to
+blows, and Crepyn was wounded. The affray took
+place in Cheapside, and Duket, fearing he had killed
+his man, sought sanctuary in Bow Church. Crepyn's
+friends, hearing of the matter, followed and having
+killed Duket, disposed of their victim's body in such
+a way as to suggest suicide. It so happened, however,
+that the sacrilegious murder had been witnessed by a
+boy who informed against the culprits and no less
+than sixteen persons were hanged for the part they
+had taken in it. Alice, herself, was condemned to be
+burnt alive as being the chief instigator of the murder;
+others, including Ralph Crepyn, were sent to the
+Tower, and only released on payment of heavy fines.<a id="noteref_309" name="noteref_309" href="#note_309"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">309</span></span></a>
+The church was placed under interdict, the doors and
+windows being filled with thorns until purification
+had been duly made. Duket's remains, which had
+been interred as those of a suicide, were afterwards
+taken up and received the rights of Christian burial in
+Bow Churchyard.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Legislative enactments of 1285.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The year 1285 was a memorable one both for
+London and the kingdom. It witnessed the passing
+of two important statutes. In the first place the
+statute <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">De Donis</span></span> legalised the principle of tying up
+real estate, so as to descend, in an exclusive perpetual
+line; in other words, it sanctioned entails, and its<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page120">[pg 120]</span><a name="Pg120" id="Pg120" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+effect is still experienced at the present day in every
+ordinary settlement of land. In the next place the
+Assise of Arms of Henry II was improved so as to
+secure for the king a national support in the time of
+danger. In every hundred and franchise each man's
+armour was to be viewed twice a year; and defaults
+reported to the king "who would find a remedy."
+The gates of walled towns were to be closed from
+sun-set to sun-rise, and watch and ward were to be
+kept as strictly as in times past, "that is to wit, from
+the day of the Ascension until the day of S. Michael,
+in every city by six men at every gate; in every
+borough, twelve men; every town, six or four,
+according to the number of the inhabitants of the
+town, and they shall watch the town continually all
+night from the sun-setting unto the sun-rising."<a id="noteref_310" name="noteref_310" href="#note_310"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">310</span></span></a>
+Three years previous to the passing of this statute the
+mayor, alderman and chamberlain had made very
+similar provisions for the keeping of the City of
+London, the city's gates, and the river Thames.<a id="noteref_311" name="noteref_311" href="#note_311"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">311</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The justiciars at the Tower, 1285</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">For the city, the year was a memorable one,
+owing to the suspension of its franchise. The
+circumstances which caused the loss of its liberties
+for a period of thirteen years (1285-1298) were these.
+The king's justiciars were sitting at the Tower, where
+the mayor, sheriffs, and aldermen of the city had
+been summoned to attend. Owing to some informality
+in the summons, Gregory de Rokesley, the
+Mayor, declined to attend in his official capacity, but
+formally "deposed himself" at the Church of All
+Hallows Barking—the limit of the city jurisdiction—<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page121">[pg 121]</span><a name="Pg121" id="Pg121" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc75" id="toc75"></a>
+by handing the city's seal to Stephen Aswy or Eswy,
+a brother alderman. On entering the chamber where
+sat the justiciars, the mayor excused his unofficial
+appearance on the ground of insufficient notice. This
+was not what the justiciars had been accustomed to.
+On the contrary, the citizens had usually shown studied
+respect towards the justiciars whenever they came to
+the Tower for the purpose of holding pleas of the
+crown.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The customary procedure when the citizens waited on the justices at the Tower.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The rules of procedure on such occasions are
+fully set out in the city's "Liber Albus,"<a id="noteref_312" name="noteref_312" href="#note_312"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">312</span></span></a> and they
+contain, curiously enough, a provision expressly made
+for cases where the full notice of forty days had not
+been given. In such an event the prescribed rule was
+to send some of their more discreet citizens to the
+king and his council to ask for the appointment of
+another day. Whether Rokesley had taken this step
+before resorting to the measures he did we are not
+told. It was also the custom on such occasions for
+the citizens to gather at Barking Church, clothed in
+their best apparel, and thence proceed in a body to
+the Tower. A deputation was appointed—selected
+members of the common council—who should also
+proceed to the Tower for the purpose of giving an
+official welcome to the justiciars on behalf of the
+citizens. It was not thought to be in any way derogatory
+to secure the goodwill of the king's justiciars
+by making ample presents. It had been done time
+out of mind. The sheriffs and aldermen were to
+attend with their respective sergeants and beadles,
+the benches at the Tower were to be examined
+beforehand and necessary repairs carried out, all shops<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page122">[pg 122]</span><a name="Pg122" id="Pg122" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+were to be closed and no business transacted during
+the session. In a word, everything was to be done
+that could add to the dignity of the justiciars and
+the solemnity of the occasion. In contrast with all
+this, Rokesley's conduct was indeed strange, and leads
+us to suppose that his action was caused by some
+other and stronger reason than the mere omission
+to give the usual notice of the coming of the king's
+justiciars.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The city declared to be taken into the king's hand.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Be this as it may, the king's treasurer, who may
+possibly have been forewarned of what was about to
+take place, at once decided what course to take. He
+declared the city to be there and then taken into the
+king's hands, on the pretext that it was found to be
+without a mayor, and he summoned the citizens to
+appear on the morrow before the king at Westminster.
+When the morrow came, the citizens duly appeared,
+and about eighty of them were detained. Those who
+accompanied Rokesley to Barking Church on the
+previous day were confined in the Tower, but after a
+few days they were all set at liberty, with the exception
+of Stephen Aswy, who was removed in custody
+to Windsor.<a id="noteref_313" name="noteref_313" href="#note_313"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">313</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">For thirteen years the city governed by a </span><span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-size: 80%; font-style: italic">custos</span></span><span style="font-size: 80%"> instead of a mayor.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The king appointed Ralph de Sandwich <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">custos</span></span> or
+warden of the city, enjoining him at the same time
+to observe the liberties and customs of the citizens,
+and for the next thirteen years (1285-1298) the city
+continued to be governed by a warden in the person
+of Sandwich or of John le Breton, whilst the sheriffs<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page123">[pg 123]</span><a name="Pg123" id="Pg123" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc76" id="toc76"></a>
+were sometimes appointed by the Exchequer and
+sometimes chosen by the citizens.<a id="noteref_314" name="noteref_314" href="#note_314"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">314</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Both the king and the city in straits for money, 1289-1290.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">In May, 1286, the king went to Gascony, leaving
+the country in charge of his nephew, Edmund, Earl
+of Cornwall, and did not return until August, 1289.
+He was then in sore straits for money, as was so
+often the case with him, and was glad of a present of
+£1,000 which the citizens offered by way of courtesy
+(<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">curialitas</span></span>). The money was ordered (14th October)
+to be levied by poll,<a id="noteref_315" name="noteref_315" href="#note_315"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">315</span></span></a> but many of the inhabitants
+were so poor that they could only find pledges for
+future payment, and these pledges were afterwards
+sold for what they would fetch.<a id="noteref_316" name="noteref_316" href="#note_316"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">316</span></span></a> A twelve-month
+later (October, 1290) when Edward visited London,
+he was fain to be content with the smaller sum of
+1,000 marks.<a id="noteref_317" name="noteref_317" href="#note_317"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">317</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The king's difficulties increased by the expulsion of the Jews, 1290.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The expulsion of the Jews in 1290 increased
+Edward's difficulties, for on them he chiefly depended
+for replenishing his empty exchequer. Their expulsion
+was not so much his own wish as the wish of his
+subjects, who, being largely in debt to the Jews,
+regarded them as cruel tyrants. The nation soon
+discovered that it had made a mistake in thus getting
+rid of its creditors, for in the absence of the Jews,<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page124">[pg 124]</span><a name="Pg124" id="Pg124" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+Edward was compelled to resort to the Lombard
+merchants. It may possibly have been owing to
+some monetary transactions between them that the
+king was solicitous of getting a life interest in the
+city's Small Beam made over to a lady known as
+Jacobina la Lumbard. No particulars are known
+of this lady, but to judge from her name she probably
+came of a family of money-lenders, and if so, the
+king's action in writing from Berwick (28th June,
+1291) to the warden and aldermen of the city—at a
+time when he was completely in the hands of the
+Italian goldsmiths and money-lenders—soliciting for
+her a more or less lucrative post is easily intelligible.<a id="noteref_318" name="noteref_318" href="#note_318"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">318</span></span></a>
+The king's request was refused, notwithstanding the
+city being at the time in charge of a <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">custos</span></span> of his own
+choice instead of a mayor elected by the citizens
+themselves. Such requests produced friction between
+the king and the city, and the former's financial
+relations with the foreign merchants were fraught
+with danger to himself and to his son.<a id="noteref_319" name="noteref_319" href="#note_319"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">319</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Edward's domestic troubles of 1290.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Edward's anxiety was in the meanwhile increased
+by domestic troubles. In 1290 he suffered a bitter
+disappointment by the death of a Scottish princess
+who was affianced to his son, the Prince of Wales,
+and thus a much-cherished plan for establishing
+friendly relations between the two countries was
+frustrated. But this disappointment was quickly<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page125">[pg 125]</span><a name="Pg125" id="Pg125" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc77" id="toc77"></a>
+cast in the shade by the more severe affliction he
+suffered in the loss of his wife. In November Queen
+Eleanor died. Her corpse was brought from Lincoln
+to Westminster, and the bereaved husband ordered a
+memorial cross to be set up at each place where
+her body rested. One of these crosses was erected
+at the west end of Cheapside. After the Reformation
+the images with which the cross was ornamented,
+like the image of Becket set over the gate
+of the Mercers' Chapel, roused the anger of the
+iconoclast, who took delight in defacing them.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Seizure of treasure in monastries and churches, 1294.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Time only increased the king's pecuniary difficulties.
+In February, 1292, all freeholders of land of
+the annual value of £40 were ordered to receive
+knighthood, and in the following January the estates
+of defaulters were seized by the king's orders.<a id="noteref_320" name="noteref_320" href="#note_320"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">320</span></span></a> In
+June, 1294, war was declared against France. Money
+must be had. Every monastery and every church
+throughout England was ransacked for treasure, and
+the sum of £2,000, found in St. Paul's Church, was
+appropriated for the public service.<a id="noteref_321" name="noteref_321" href="#note_321"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">321</span></span></a> The dean was
+seized with a fit (<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">subita percussus passione</span></span>) and died
+in the king's presence.<a id="noteref_322" name="noteref_322" href="#note_322"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">322</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The city furnishes ships and men for the defence of the coast 1295, 1296.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Instead of invading France, Edward found his
+own shores devastated by a French fleet, whilst at
+the same time his hands were full with fresh difficulties
+from Scotland and Wales. In the summer of
+1295, the city furnished the king with three ships,
+the cost being defrayed by a tax of twopence in<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page126">[pg 126]</span><a name="Pg126" id="Pg126" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+the pound charged on chattels and merchandise.
+John le Breton, then warden, advanced the sum of
+£40, which the aldermen and six men of each ward
+undertook to repay.<a id="noteref_323" name="noteref_323" href="#note_323"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">323</span></span></a> In the following year (1296)
+the city agreed, after some little hesitation, to furnish
+forty men with caparisoned horses, and fifty arbalesters
+for the defence of the south coast, under
+the king's son, Edward of Carnarvon.<a id="noteref_324" name="noteref_324" href="#note_324"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">324</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The subjection of Scotland, 1296.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Edward again turned his attention to Scotland,
+and, having succeeded in reducing Balliol to submission,
+he carried off from Scone the stone which
+legend identifies with Jacob's pillow, and on which
+the Scottish kings had from time immemorial been
+crowned,<a id="noteref_325" name="noteref_325" href="#note_325"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">325</span></span></a> By Edward's order the stone was enclosed
+in a stately seat, and placed in Westminster Abbey,
+where it has since served as the coronation chair of
+English sovereigns.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The parliament of Bury St. Edmund's, 3rd Nov., 1296.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">From Berwick Edward issued (26 Aug., 1296,)
+writs for a Parliament to meet at Bury St. Edmund's,
+in the following November. The constitution of
+this Parliament was the same as that which had
+met at Westminster in November of the previous
+year (1295) and which was intended to serve as a
+model parliament, a pattern for all future national
+assemblies. The city was represented by two aldermen,
+namely, Sir Stephen Aswy, or Eswy, who had
+been confined in Windsor Castle ten years before for
+his conduct towards the king's justiciars at the Tower,
+and Sir William de Hereford.<a id="noteref_326" name="noteref_326" href="#note_326"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">326</span></span></a> From this time forward<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page127">[pg 127]</span><a name="Pg127" id="Pg127" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc78" id="toc78"></a>
+down to the present day we have little difficulty in
+discovering from one source or another the names of
+the city's representatives in successive parliaments.
+Edward, of course, wanted money. The barons and
+knights increased their former grants; so also did the
+burgesses. The clergy, on the other hand, declared
+themselves unable to make any grant at all in the
+face of a papal prohibition,<a id="noteref_327" name="noteref_327" href="#note_327"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">327</span></span></a> and the king was at last
+driven to seize the lay fees of the clergy of the
+province of Canterbury. In the spring of the following
+year he proceeded to seize all the wool of the
+country, paying for it by tallies, and to levy a supply
+of provisions on the counties. The act was only
+justifiable on the plea of necessity, and led to
+measures being taken to prevent its repetition.<a id="noteref_328" name="noteref_328" href="#note_328"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">328</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Edward's altercation with Roger Bigod, Feb., 1297.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">It was an easier matter for Edward to raise
+money than to get the barons to accompany him
+abroad. To leave them behind was to risk the peace
+of the country. He therefore spared no efforts to
+persuade them to join in a projected expedition, and
+when persuasion failed tried threats. It was his
+desire that the barons should go to Gascony, whilst
+he took the command in Flanders. This was not at
+all to the taste of the barons, who declined to go
+abroad, except in the personal retinue of the king
+himself. "With you, O king," said Roger Bigod, "I
+will gladly go; as belongs to me by hereditary right,
+I will go in front of the host, before your face;" but
+without the king he positively declined to move.
+"By God, earl," cried the king, fairly roused by the<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page128">[pg 128]</span><a name="Pg128" id="Pg128" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+obstinacy of his vassal, "you shall either go or
+hang;" to which the earl replied, with equal determination,
+"By the same token, O king, I will neither
+go nor hang."<a id="noteref_329" name="noteref_329" href="#note_329"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">329</span></span></a></p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Nothing daunted, the king issued writs (15 May)
+for a military levy of the whole kingdom for service
+abroad, to meet at London on the 7th July, a
+measure as unconstitutional as the seizure of wool
+and the levying of taxes without the assent of
+Parliament. On the day appointed, the barons, who
+had received a large accession of strength from the
+great vassals, appeared with their forces at St. Paul's;
+but instead of complying with the king's demands—or
+rather requests, for the king had altered his tone—they
+prepared a list of their grievances.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The "Confirmatio Cartarum," Oct. 1297.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">With difficulty civil war was avoided, and in
+August Edward set sail for Flanders. No sooner was
+his back turned, than the barons and the Londoners
+made common cause in insisting upon a confirmation
+and amplification of their charters.<a id="noteref_330" name="noteref_330" href="#note_330"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">330</span></span></a> Prince Edward,
+the king's son, who had been appointed regent in his
+father's absence, granted all that was asked, and on
+the 10th October (1297), the <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Confirmatio Cartarum</span></span>,
+as it was called, was issued in the king's name.<a id="noteref_331" name="noteref_331" href="#note_331"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">331</span></span></a>
+Thenceforth, no customs duties were to be exacted
+without the consent of parliament.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The mayoralty restored to the city, 11th April, 1298.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">In view of the king's return to England in March
+(1298), the warden of the city, Sir John Breton, the
+aldermen, and a deputation from the wards met
+together and resolved that every inhabitant of the<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page129">[pg 129]</span><a name="Pg129" id="Pg129" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc79" id="toc79"></a>
+city, citizen and stranger, should pay to the king's
+collectors the sum of sixpence in the pound of all
+their goods up to £100.<a id="noteref_332" name="noteref_332" href="#note_332"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">332</span></span></a> In the following month
+Edward issued letters patent (11th April), restoring
+to the citizens their franchises and the right of again
+electing their mayor.<a id="noteref_333" name="noteref_333" href="#note_333"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">333</span></span></a> The choice of the citizens fell
+upon Henry le Waleys, who was duly admitted by the
+Barons of the Exchequer after presentation to the
+king.<a id="noteref_334" name="noteref_334" href="#note_334"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">334</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Suppression of the Scottish rising under Wallace, 1298, 1304.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">In the summer Edward marched to Scotland for
+the purpose of putting down the rising under Wallace.
+An account of the battle of Falkirk, fought on the
+22nd July, was conveyed to the mayor, aldermen,
+and "barons" of London, by letter from Walter
+Langton, Bishop of Lichfield and Coventry, or, as he
+was then styled, Bishop of Chester, who wrote as an
+eye-witness, if not indeed as a partaker in that day's
+work.<a id="noteref_335" name="noteref_335" href="#note_335"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">335</span></span></a> It was the first battle of any consequence in
+which the English long-bow was brought into prominence.
+Edward's victory was complete. The enemy's
+loss was great, the number that perished, according to
+the bishop's information, being two hundred men-at-arms
+and twenty thousand foot soldiers. Edward
+was unable, however, to follow up his success for
+want of supplies, and so retreated. In 1304, he again
+marched northward, notwithstanding the defection of
+many nobles. He had previously resorted once more
+to the questionable practice of talliaging the city of<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page130">[pg 130]</span><a name="Pg130" id="Pg130" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+London,<a id="noteref_336" name="noteref_336" href="#note_336"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">336</span></span></a> levying from the citizens the fifteenth penny
+of their moveable goods and the tenth penny of their
+rents.<a id="noteref_337" name="noteref_337" href="#note_337"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">337</span></span></a> The campaign was eminently successful.
+Sterling surrendered after a siege of two months, and
+Wallace himself shortly afterwards fell into his hands,
+having refused the terms of an amnesty which Edward
+had generously offered.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Wallace brought to London, 22 Aug., 1305.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">He was carried to London, where a crowd of men
+and women flocked out to meet one, of whose gigantic
+stature and feats of strength they had heard so much.
+He was lodged in the house of William de Leyre, an
+alderman of the city, situate in the parish of All
+Hallows at the Hay or All Hallows the Great.
+Having been tried at Westminster and condemned to
+death on charges of treason, sacrilege and robbery,
+he was hanged, drawn, and quartered, and his head
+set up on London Bridge.<a id="noteref_338" name="noteref_338" href="#note_338"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">338</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Knighthood conferred on John le Blound, the mayor, and others, May 1306.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">No sooner was Wallace disposed of than another
+claimant to the Scottish crown appeared in the person
+of Bruce. Before Edward took the field against the
+new foe, he conferred knighthood upon his son and
+nearly three hundred others, including John le Blound
+the mayor. The number of knights within the small
+compass of the city was reckoned at that time to be
+not less than a thousand.<a id="noteref_339" name="noteref_339" href="#note_339"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">339</span></span></a> Knighthood, as we have
+seen, was one of the means Edward resorted to for
+raising money, and on this occasion the citizens of<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page131">[pg 131]</span><a name="Pg131" id="Pg131" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc80" id="toc80"></a>
+London are said to have made him a free gift of
+£2,000, in recognition of the honour bestowed on
+their mayor.<a id="noteref_340" name="noteref_340" href="#note_340"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">340</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Death of the king, 7th July, 1307.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">In the summer of 1307, Edward set out to
+execute the vow of vengeance against Bruce that he
+had made on the occasion of the knighthood of his
+son, but the hand of death was upon him, and before
+lie reached the Scottish border he died (7th July).</p>
+</div>
+</div>
+
+<hr class="doublepage" /><div class="tei tei-div" style="margin-bottom: 5.00em; margin-top: 5.00em">
+<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page132">[pg 132]</span><a name="Pg132" id="Pg132" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+<a name="toc81" id="toc81"></a>
+<a name="pdf82" id="pdf82"></a>
+<h1 class="tei tei-head" style="text-align: left; margin-bottom: 3.46em; margin-top: 3.46em"><span style="font-size: 173%">CHAPTER VI.</span></h1>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-div" style="margin-bottom: 4.00em; margin-top: 4.00em">
+<h2 class="tei tei-head" style="text-align: left; margin-bottom: 2.88em; margin-top: 2.88em"></h2>
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The accession of Edward II.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The new king's character, differing as it did so
+much from that of his father, was not one to commend
+itself to the citizens of London. With them he never
+became a favourite. The bold and determined character
+of Queen Isabel, the very antipodes of her
+husband, was more to their liking, and throughout
+the contests that ensued between them, the citizens
+steadily supported her cause. At her first appearance,
+as a bride, in the city, the streets were compared with
+the New Jerusalem, so rich were they in appearance;<a id="noteref_341" name="noteref_341" href="#note_341"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">341</span></span></a>
+whilst at the coronation ceremony, which took place
+a month later (25th February, 1308), she and her
+husband were escorted by the mayor and aldermen
+in their most gorgeous robes, quartered with the arms
+of England and France, and were served at the banquet
+as custom commanded.<a id="noteref_342" name="noteref_342" href="#note_342"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">342</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The king's foreign favourites.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">But even thus early in Edward of Carnarvon's
+reign the presence of foreigners—to whom the king
+was even more addicted than his father—was likely
+to prove a source of trouble; and it was necessary to
+make special proclamations forbidding the carrying of<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page133">[pg 133]</span><a name="Pg133" id="Pg133" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc83" id="toc83"></a>
+arms on the day of the coronation and enjoining
+respect for foreigners attending the ceremony.<a id="noteref_343" name="noteref_343" href="#note_343"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">343</span></span></a> The
+king's foreign favourites proved his ruin, and contributed
+in no small degree to the eventual defection of
+the city. They were for ever desiring some favour of
+the citizens. At one time it was Piers de Gavestone
+who wanted a post for his "valet";<a id="noteref_344" name="noteref_344" href="#note_344"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">344</span></span></a> at another it
+was Hugh le Despenser who desired (and obtained) a
+lease of the Small Beam for a friend.<a id="noteref_345" name="noteref_345" href="#note_345"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">345</span></span></a> The friend
+only held the Beam for little more than six months,
+and then, at the urgent request of the queen herself,
+it was given to another.<a id="noteref_346" name="noteref_346" href="#note_346"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">346</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The Ordainers and their work, 1308-1311.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The barons were especially irritated at being
+supplanted by the king's favourites, and in 1308
+succeeded in getting Edward to send Gaveston out
+of England. In the following year, however, he was
+recalled, and the barons became so exasperated that
+in 1310, when the king summoned an assembly of
+bishops and barons, the latter appeared, contrary to
+orders, in full military array. The king could not do
+otherwise than submit to their dictation. Ordainers
+were appointed from among the barons for the purpose
+of drawing up ordinances for the government of
+the kingdom. These ordinances were promulgated
+in their complete form in 1311, when they received
+the sanction of a parliament assembled at the House
+of the Black Friars, in the month of August, and were
+afterwards publicly proclaimed in St. Paul's Churchyard,<a id="noteref_347" name="noteref_347" href="#note_347"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">347</span></span></a>
+special precautions being taken at the time to<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page134">[pg 134]</span><a name="Pg134" id="Pg134" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+safeguard the gates of the city by night and
+day.<a id="noteref_348" name="noteref_348" href="#note_348"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">348</span></span></a> Gaveston was condemned to banishment for
+life.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The City's gift of 1,000 marks to assist the king against Scotland, March, 1311.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">In the meantime, whilst the Ordainers were engaged
+on their work, Edward had put himself at the
+head of his army and marched against the Scots, who
+were rapidly gaining ground under Bruce. He remained
+on the border until July, 1311, trying every
+means to raise money. In March of that year the
+city sent him one thousand marks, by the hands of
+Roger le Palmere and William de Flete, the mayor,
+Richer de Refham, contributing no less than one
+hundred pounds of the whole sum. The money was
+despatched on horseback, tied up in baskets covered
+with matting and bound with cords, and the cost of
+every particular is set out in the city's records.<a id="noteref_349" name="noteref_349" href="#note_349"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">349</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Richer de Refham, Mayor, 1310-1311.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Refham was a mayor of the popular type. He
+had already suffered deprivation of his aldermanry for
+some reason or another, but was reinstated in 13O2.<a id="noteref_350" name="noteref_350" href="#note_350"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">350</span></span></a>
+No sooner was he chosen mayor than he caused a
+collection to be made of the ancient liberties and
+customs of the city, from the books and rolls preserved
+in the city's Chamber, and having assembled
+the aldermen and best men of the city, he caused
+them to be publicly read. This having been done,
+he next proceeded to ask the assembly if it was their
+will that these ancient customs and liberties, which
+had so often been infringed by the removal of mayors<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page135">[pg 135]</span><a name="Pg135" id="Pg135" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc84" id="toc84"></a>
+and sheriffs, should be for the future maintained. Their
+answer being given unanimously in the affirmative,
+he at once took steps to obtain the king's writ of
+confirmation, and caused them to be proclaimed
+throughout the city. He made a perambulation of
+the city and abated all nuisances and encroachments.
+He went further than this. For some time past the
+streets had been rendered unsafe to pass after dark
+by bands of rioters who at that day were known by
+the <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">sobriquet</span></span> of "roreres." A few years later, the
+same class went under the name of "riffleres." They
+were the precursors of the "Muns," the "Tityre Tus,"
+the "Hectors," and the "Scourers,"—dynasties of
+tyrants, as Macaulay styles them, which domineered
+over the streets of London, soon after the Restoration,
+and at a later period were superseded by the "Nickers,"
+the "Hawcubites," and the still more dreaded "Mohawks,"
+of Queen Anne's reign. By whatever name
+they happened at the time to be known, their practice
+was the same, viz.:—assault and robbery of peaceful
+citizens whose business or pleasure carried them
+abroad after sundown.</p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">During Refham's mayoralty, a raid was made on
+all common nightwalkers, "bruisers" (<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">pugnatores</span></span>),
+common "roreres," <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">wagabunds</span></span> and others, and many
+were committed to prison, to the great relief of the
+more peaceably disposed.<a id="noteref_351" name="noteref_351" href="#note_351"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">351</span></span></a></p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">His strictness and impartiality were such as to
+raise up enemies, and an excuse was found for removing
+him not only from the office of mayor, but<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page136">[pg 136]</span><a name="Pg136" id="Pg136" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+once again from his aldermanry.<a id="noteref_352" name="noteref_352" href="#note_352"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">352</span></span></a> On this point,
+however, the city archives are altogether silent, they
+only record the appointment of his successor to the
+mayoralty chair at the usual time and in the usual
+manner.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The fall of Gaveston.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">In January, 1312, the king returned to the north,
+and as soon as he had arrived at York ignored the
+ordinance touching Gaveston, and instead of sending
+his favourite into exile, received him into favour and
+restored his forfeited estates. Foreseeing the storm
+that he would have to meet from the barons, the king
+wrote from Knaresborough (9th Jan.) to Refham's
+successor, John de Gisors, enjoining him to put the
+city into a state of defence, and not allow armed men
+to enter on any pretext whatever.<a id="noteref_353" name="noteref_353" href="#note_353"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">353</span></span></a> On the 21st he
+wrote again, not only to the mayor, but to nineteen
+leading men of the city, exhorting them to hold the
+city for him.<a id="noteref_354" name="noteref_354" href="#note_354"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">354</span></span></a> Other letters followed in quick succession—on
+the 24th and 31st January and the 8th
+February—all couched in similar terms.<a id="noteref_355" name="noteref_355" href="#note_355"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">355</span></span></a> When,
+however, he saw how hopeless his case was, Edward
+sent word to the mayor and sheriffs that the barons
+might be admitted provided the city was still held for
+the king. Accordingly the barons were admitted
+without bloodshed, and held consultation at St. Paul's
+as to what was best to be done.<a id="noteref_356" name="noteref_356" href="#note_356"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">356</span></span></a> Gaveston's days
+were numbered. On the 12th June he was forced to<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page137">[pg 137]</span><a name="Pg137" id="Pg137" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc85" id="toc85"></a>
+surrender unconditionally to the Earl of Warwick,
+and that day week was beheaded without the semblance
+of a trial.<a id="noteref_357" name="noteref_357" href="#note_357"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">357</span></span></a></p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The influence he had exercised over the king had
+been remarkable from their youth. The son of a
+Gascon knight, he had been brought up with Edward
+as his foster brother and playfellow, and in course of
+time the strong will of the favourite gained a complete
+mastery over the weaker will of the prince. But his
+arrogant behaviour soon raised such a storm among
+the nobles at Court that he was forced to leave
+England. When Edward succeeded to the throne, one
+of his first acts was to recall Gaveston, to whom he
+gave his own niece in marriage, after having bestowed
+upon him the Earldom of Cornwall. The king seemed
+never tired of heaping wealth upon his friend. Among
+other things, he bestowed upon his favourite (28th
+Aug., 1309) the sum of 100 shillings payable out of
+the rent of £50 due from the citizens of London for
+Oueenhithe, to be held by him, his wife, and the heirs
+of their bodies.<a id="noteref_358" name="noteref_358" href="#note_358"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">358</span></span></a></p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Both of them had friends and enemies in
+common. As Prince of Wales, Edward had made
+an attempt to encroach upon some woods belonging
+to Walter Langton, Bishop of Chester. This caused
+a breach between father and son, and the prince
+was banished from Court for a whole half-year.
+Gaveston also bore the same bishop a grudge, for
+it was owing in a great measure to Langton's influence
+as treasurer to Edward I that he was in the first
+instance forced into exile. When the prince succeeded<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page138">[pg 138]</span><a name="Pg138" id="Pg138" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+his father, there came a day of retribution for the
+bishop; his property was handed over to Gaveston,
+and he himself carried prisoner from castle to castle
+by the now all powerful favourite. A proclamation
+was also issued at the instance of Gaveston, inviting
+complaints against the bishop.<a id="noteref_359" name="noteref_359" href="#note_359"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">359</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Parliament at London. August, 1312.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Edward had purposed holding a parliament at
+Lincoln towards the end of July, 1312, but the turn
+that affairs had taken induced him to change his mind,
+and he summoned it to meet at Westminster.<a id="noteref_360" name="noteref_360" href="#note_360"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">360</span></span></a> It was
+important that he should secure the city, if possible,
+in his favour. In this he was successful; so that
+when the barons appeared to threaten London, having
+arrived with a large force at Ware, they found the
+city's gates strongly guarded.<a id="noteref_361" name="noteref_361" href="#note_361"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">361</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The birth of a prince, 13 Nov., 1312.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">In November (1312), the queen gave birth to a
+son, who afterwards ascended the throne as Edward III.
+Isabel herself informed the citizens of the auspicious
+event by letter sent by the hands of John de Falaise,
+her "taillur."<a id="noteref_362" name="noteref_362" href="#note_362"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">362</span></span></a> The news had already reached the
+city, however, before the queen's own messenger
+arrived, and he signified his disappointment at being
+forestalled by declining to accept a sum of £10 and a
+silver cup of 32 ozs., which the city offered him by
+way of gratuity, as being inadequate to his deserts.
+As nothing further is recorded of the matter, it is
+probable that the offended tailor had reason to repent
+of his folly. For more than a week the city was
+given up to merry-making, in honour of the birth of<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page139">[pg 139]</span><a name="Pg139" id="Pg139" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc86" id="toc86"></a>
+an heir to the crown. The conduits ran with wine;
+a solemn mass was sung at St. Paul's, and the mayor
+and aldermen rode in state to Westminster, accompanied
+by members of the fraternities of drapers,
+mercers, and vintners of London, in their respective
+liveries, to make offering, returning to dine at the
+Guildhall, which was hung with tapestry as befitted
+the occasion.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The question of the king's rights to talliage the city, 1312-1314.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">After the death of Gaveston, his old enemy
+Walter Langton again found favour and resumed his
+office as treasurer. The city had little reason to be
+gratified at his return to power; for it was by his
+advice that the king in December of this year (1312),
+issued orders for a talliage, which the great towns,
+and especially London, objected to pay. Early in the
+following January (1313), the mayor and aldermen
+were summoned to attend the royal council, sitting at
+the house of the White Friars. The question was
+there put to them—would they make fine for the
+talliage, or be assessed by poll on their rents and
+chattels? Before making answer, the mayor and
+aldermen desired to consult the commons of the city.
+An adjournment accordingly took place for that
+purpose. When next the mayor and aldermen
+appeared before the council, they resisted the talliage
+on the following grounds:<a id="noteref_363" name="noteref_363" href="#note_363"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">363</span></span></a>—In the first place, because,
+although the king might talliage cities and boroughs
+that were of his demesne, he could not, as they
+understood, talliage the City of London, which
+enjoyed exemption from such an imposition by
+charter. In the next place, there were prelates and
+barons, besides citizens, who enjoyed rents and<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page140">[pg 140]</span><a name="Pg140" id="Pg140" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+tenements in the city, and their consent would first
+have to be obtained before the municipal authorities
+could levy such a tax. Thirdly, the citizens held the
+city by grant of former kings, at a fee ferm for all
+services payable into the exchequer, and on that
+account ought not to be talliaged. Under these circumstances
+the council was asked to delay the talliage
+until Parliament should meet.</p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">This request the king and council expressed
+themselves as ready to comply with on condition that
+the city made an immediate advance of 2,000 marks.
+The city refused, and the king's assessors appeared at
+the Guildhall, and read their commission. They were
+on the point of commencing work, when the city
+obtained a respite until the meeting of Parliament
+by a loan of £1,000. More than eighteen months
+elapsed, and at last a Parliament was summoned to
+meet at York (Sept. 1314); but the country was
+in such a disturbed state, owing to the renewal of
+the war with Scotland, that the talliage question was
+not discussed. Nevertheless the king's officers
+appeared again in the city to make an assessment,
+and again they were bought off by another loan of
+£400. The king took the money and broke his word,
+and the record of pledges taken from citizens for
+"arrears of divers talliages and not redeemed," is
+significant of the hardship inflicted by this illegal
+exaction on a large number of inhabitants of the city.<a id="noteref_364" name="noteref_364" href="#note_364"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">364</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The renewal of the war with Scotland, 1314.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Out of this sum of £400, nearly one-half (£178
+3<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">s.</span></span> 4<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">d.</span></span>), was allowed the city for the purpose of
+furnishing the king with a contingent of 120<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page141">[pg 141]</span><a name="Pg141" id="Pg141" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc87" id="toc87"></a>
+arbalesters, fully equipped for the defence of Berwick.
+Edward had been defeated by the Scots at Bannockburn
+(24 June, 1314), and Berwick was threatened.
+On the 21st November, Edward wrote from Northampton,
+asking for 300 arbalesters if the city could
+provide so many; but the city could do no more
+than furnish him with 120.<a id="noteref_365" name="noteref_365" href="#note_365"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">365</span></span></a> The fall of Berwick was
+only postponed. In 1318 the great border fortress
+against Scotland was captured by Bruce. Edward was
+forced soon afterwards to come to terms with the
+Earl of Lancaster and the barons with whom he
+had so long been in avowed antagonism, and a general
+pacification ensued, which received the sanction of
+Parliament sitting at York in November.<a id="noteref_366" name="noteref_366" href="#note_366"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">366</span></span></a> On the
+4th December, the king sent home the foot soldiers
+which the city had furnished, with a letter of thanks
+for the aid they had afforded him. They were
+immediately paid off and disbanded.<a id="noteref_367" name="noteref_367" href="#note_367"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">367</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Dissension in the city, 1318-1319.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">It was not long before the king and Lancaster
+were preparing to join forces for the recovery of
+Berwick. In the meantime, the Barons of the
+Exchequer appeared at the Guildhall (25th February,
+1319), and summoned the mayor, sheriffs and aldermen
+to answer for certain trespasses. Several holders
+of office, and among them Edmund le Lorimer, Gaoler
+of Newgate, for whom Hugh le Despenser had solicited
+the Small Beam, were deposed: a proceeding
+which gave rise to much bickering between mayor,
+aldermen and commons. Disputes, moreover, had
+arisen in the city touching the election and removal
+of the mayor, sheriffs and aldermen of the city, which<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page142">[pg 142]</span><a name="Pg142" id="Pg142" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+required some pressure from the Earl Marshal and
+other of the king's ministers, sitting in the Chapter-house
+of St. Paul's, before peace could be restored.<a id="noteref_368" name="noteref_368" href="#note_368"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">368</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Articles for the better government of the city confirmed
+by the king, 8th June, 1319.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">According to the writer of the French Chronicle,
+to which reference has frequently been made,<a id="noteref_369" name="noteref_369" href="#note_369"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">369</span></span></a> the
+dissension in the city was mainly attributable to John
+de Wengrave, the mayor. The citizens had lately been
+busy drawing up certain "points" for a new charter.
+Wengrave, who was at the time, or until quite recently,
+the city's Recorder, had contrived, in 1318, to force
+himself into the mayoralty having served as mayor
+the two years preceding—"against the will of the
+commons." He had shown no little opposition to
+the "points" of the proposed charter, possibly because
+one of the points precluded the mayor, for the time
+being, from drawing or hearing pleas, saving only
+"those pleas which, as mayor, he ought to hear,
+according to the custom of the city."<a id="noteref_370" name="noteref_370" href="#note_370"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">370</span></span></a> If this
+received the king's approval, Wengrave's occupation
+as Recorder, at least so long as he was mayor, was
+gone. However this may be, the mayor's opposition
+was rendered futile, and the articles were confirmed
+by the king's letters patent.<a id="noteref_371" name="noteref_371" href="#note_371"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">371</span></span></a> Their main feature has
+already been alluded to; thenceforth the direct way
+to the civic franchise was to be through membership
+of one of the civic guilds. A foreigner or stranger,
+not a member of a guild, could only obtain it by
+appealing to the full body of citizens before admission<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page143">[pg 143]</span><a name="Pg143" id="Pg143" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc88" id="toc88"></a>
+through the Court of Husting. Conscious of their
+newly acquired importance, the guilds began to array
+themselves in liveries, and "a good time was about
+to begin."<a id="noteref_372" name="noteref_372" href="#note_372"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">372</span></span></a> Edward did not give his assent to these
+articles without receiving a <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">quid pro quo</span></span>. The citizens
+were mulcted in a sum of £1,000 before the king's
+seal was set to the letters patent.<a id="noteref_373" name="noteref_373" href="#note_373"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">373</span></span></a> They did not
+mind this so much as they did the annoyance caused
+by the king's justiciars eighteen months later.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The Iter at the Tower of 1321.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Early in 1321 commenced a memorable Iter at
+the Tower which lasted twenty-four weeks and three
+days. No such Iter had been held before, although
+the last Iter held in 1275 had been a remarkable one
+for the courageous conduct of Gregory de Rokesle,
+the mayor. This was to surpass every other session
+of Pleas of the Crown in its powers of inquisition, and
+was destined to draw off many a would-be loyal
+citizen from the king's side. Its professed object was
+to examine into unlawful "colligations, confederations,
+and conventions by oaths," which were known (or
+supposed) to have been formed in the city.<a id="noteref_374" name="noteref_374" href="#note_374"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">374</span></span></a> The
+following particulars of its proceedings are gathered
+from an account preserved in the city's records and
+supervised, if not compiled, by Andrew Horn, the
+city's Chamberlain, an able lawyer who was employed
+as Counsel for the city during at least a portion of the
+Iter.<a id="noteref_375" name="noteref_375" href="#note_375"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">375</span></span></a> The annoyance caused by this Iter, the general
+stoppage of trade and commerce, the hindrance of
+municipal business, is realised when we consider that<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page144">[pg 144]</span><a name="Pg144" id="Pg144" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+for six months not only the mayor, sheriffs and
+aldermen for the time being, but everyone who had
+filled any office in the city since the holding of
+the last Iter—a period of nearly half a century—as
+well as twelve representatives from each ward,
+were called upon to be in constant attendance. All
+charters were to be produced, and persons who had
+grievances of any kind were invited to appear. Great
+commotion prevailed among the citizens upon receiving
+the king's writ, and they at once addressed themselves
+to examining the procedure followed at former Iters.
+It is probable, as Mr. Riley suggests, that for this
+purpose they had resort to the "Ordinances of the
+Iter" already mentioned as set out in the city's Liber
+Albus.<a id="noteref_376" name="noteref_376" href="#note_376"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">376</span></span></a> When the dreaded day arrived and the
+justiciars had taken their seat at the Tower, the mayor
+and aldermen, who, according to custom, as already
+seen in Rokesley's day, were assembled at the church
+of All Hallows Barking, sent a deputation to welcome
+them, and to make a formal request for a safe conduct
+to the citizens on entering the Tower. This favour
+being granted, the king's commission was read.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Complaint of negligence of duty by the sheriffs.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The opening of the Iter did not augur well for the
+city. Fault was found, at the outset, by Geoffrey le
+Scrop, the king's sergeant-pleader, because the sheriffs
+had not attended so promptly as they should have done.
+The excuse that they had only acted according to custom
+in waiting for the grant of a safe conduct was held
+unsatisfactory, and nothing would please him but that
+the city should be at once taken into the king's hand.<a id="noteref_377" name="noteref_377" href="#note_377"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">377</span></span></a></p>
+
+<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page145">[pg 145]</span><a name="Pg145" id="Pg145" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc89" id="toc89"></a>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The city claims to record its custom by mouth of the Recorder.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Again, when the citizens claimed to record their
+liberties and customs by word of mouth without being
+compelled to reduce them into writing, as the justices
+had ordered, the only reply they got was that they
+did so at their own peril.<a id="noteref_378" name="noteref_378" href="#note_378"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">378</span></span></a> Three days were consumed
+in preliminary discussion of points of etiquette
+and questions of minor importance.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">the 4th day of the Iter.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">On the fourth day the mayor and citizens put in
+their claim of liberties, which they supported by
+various charters.<a id="noteref_379" name="noteref_379" href="#note_379"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">379</span></span></a> The justiciars desired answers on
+three points, which were duly made,<a id="noteref_380" name="noteref_380" href="#note_380"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">380</span></span></a> and matters
+seemed to be getting forward when there arrived orders
+from the king that the justiciars should enquire as to
+the ancient right of the aldermen to record their
+liberties orally in the king's courts. Having heard
+what the citizens had to say on this point, the
+justiciars were instructed to withhold their judgment;
+and this and other questions touching the
+liberties of the city were to be postponed for future
+determination.<a id="noteref_381" name="noteref_381" href="#note_381"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">381</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The 9th day of the Iter.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">On the ninth day of the Iter, a long schedule,
+containing over 100 articles upon which the Crown
+desired information, was delivered to each ward of
+the city.<a id="noteref_382" name="noteref_382" href="#note_382"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">382</span></span></a> Days and weeks were consumed in considering
+various presentments, besides private suits
+and pleas of the Crown. Suits were determined in
+the Great Hall of the Tower facing the Thames,
+whilst pleas of the Crown were heard in the Lesser
+Hall, beneath the eastern tower. The justiciars
+occasionally protracted their sittings till dusk, much
+to the disgust of the citizens, whose business was<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page146">[pg 146]</span><a name="Pg146" id="Pg146" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+necessarily at a stand-still, and as yet no indictments
+had been made.<a id="noteref_383" name="noteref_383" href="#note_383"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">383</span></span></a> These were to come.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Indictment against a late mayor.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">On the thirty-fourth day of the Iter, John de
+Gisors was indicted for having during his mayoralty
+(1311-1313), admitted a felon to the freedom of the
+city, and fraudulently altered the date of his admission.
+The question of criminality turned upon this date. Had
+the felony been committed before or after admission?
+The accused declared in his defence that admission to
+the freedom had taken place before the felony; a jury,
+however, came to the opposite conclusion, and not
+only found that admission had taken place after an
+indictment for the felony, but that the mayor at the
+time was aware of the indictment. The judges
+therefore ordered Gisors into custody. He was soon
+afterwards released on bail, but not without paying
+a fine of 100 marks.<a id="noteref_384" name="noteref_384" href="#note_384"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">384</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The city taken into the king's hand.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">A similar indictment against his son Anketin, as
+having participated in his father's offence, failed.
+Within a week of Gisors's indictment, the mayor for
+the time being, Nicholas de Farndon, was deposed,
+and the city placed in the hands of Sir Robert de
+Kendale, the king's commissioner.<a id="noteref_385" name="noteref_385" href="#note_385"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">385</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Adjournment of the Iter over Easter.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">For nine weeks in succession the citizens had
+suffered from the inconveniences of the Iter, when a
+brief adjournment over Easter took place. In the
+meantime, an assay was held at the Guildhall of the
+new weights and measures which Walter Stapleton,
+Bishop of Exeter, had, in his capacity as the king's<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page147">[pg 147]</span><a name="Pg147" id="Pg147" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc90" id="toc90"></a>
+treasurer, caused to be issued throughout the country.
+One result of the trial was that whilst the city's
+weight of eight marks was discovered to be slightly
+deficient, the city's bushel was found to be more true
+than the king's.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Sudden change in the attitude of the judges after Easter.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">After Easter the sittings of the justiciars were
+resumed. A great change, however, had come over
+them during the recess. They no longer behaved
+"like lions eager for their prey; on the contrary, they
+had become very lambs."<a id="noteref_386" name="noteref_386" href="#note_386"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">386</span></span></a> The reason for this sudden
+change, we are told, was the insurrection in Wales,
+under the Earl of Hereford, the king's brother-in-law.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Andrew Horn appears as counsel for the City.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The chief questions discussed before the justices
+were the right of the weavers of London to hold their
+guild, and the right of the fishmongers of Fish-wharf
+to sell their fish at their wharf by retail instead
+of on their vessels or at the city markets. The claim
+of the fishmongers was opposed by Andrew Horn,
+himself a fishmonger by trade, as well as an eminent
+lawyer, who acted on this occasion as leading counsel
+for the City.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The indictment brought against the Constable of the Tower.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">When Whitsuntide was approaching, an indictment
+was brought by the city wards against their old
+enemy John de Crombwelle, the Constable of the
+Tower. He had already made himself obnoxious to
+the citizens by attempting to enclose a portion of the
+city's lands;<a id="noteref_387" name="noteref_387" href="#note_387"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">387</span></span></a> and now he was accused of seizing a
+small vessel laden with tiles, and converting the same
+to his own use, and further, with taking bribes for<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page148">[pg 148]</span><a name="Pg148" id="Pg148" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+allowing unauthorised "kidels" to remain in the
+Thames. The judges, having heard what he had to
+say in defence, postponed the further hearing until
+after Trinity Sunday (14th June). In the meantime,
+the citizens had the gratification of seeing the
+constable removed from office, for allowing the
+Tower to fall into such a dilapidated state, that the
+rain came in upon the queen's bed, while giving birth
+to a daughter, afterwards known as Joanna of the
+Tower,<a id="noteref_388" name="noteref_388" href="#note_388"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">388</span></span></a> and destined to become the wife of David
+the Second, King of Scotland.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The Iter brought to a sudden termination. 4 July, 1321.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">On the judges resuming their sittings after
+Trinity Sunday, they sat no longer in the Great Hall
+or the Lesser Hall, "as well by reason of the queen
+being in childbed there, as already mentioned, as of
+the fortifying of the Tower, through fear of the
+Earl of Hereford and his accomplices, who were in
+insurrection on every side." Temporary buildings
+had to be found for them. A fortnight later there
+were signs of the Iter being brought to an abrupt
+termination, the citizens having represented that they
+could not possibly keep proper watch and ward owing
+to disturbances consequent to the holding of the
+Iter;<a id="noteref_389" name="noteref_389" href="#note_389"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">389</span></span></a> and within a week, viz., on 4th July, it was
+actually closed.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The mayoralty restored to the city.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">It was the bursting of the storm which had long
+been gathering against the king's new favourites, the
+Despensers, father and son, that caused the sudden
+termination of the Iter, and it was the fear lest he
+should lose the support of the city against Lancaster
+and his allies that caused the king quickly to restore<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page149">[pg 149]</span><a name="Pg149" id="Pg149" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc91" id="toc91"></a>
+to the citizens their Mayor. Hamo de Chigwell took
+the place of the deposed Farndon.<a id="noteref_390" name="noteref_390" href="#note_390"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">390</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The City promises to support the king, July, 1321.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Within a few hours of the closing of the Iter
+Chigwell and the aldermen were summoned to
+Westminster to say whether they would be willing
+to support the king and to preserve the city of London
+to his use in his contest with the barons. Edward
+and his council received for answer that the mayor
+and his brethren "were unwilling to refuse the safe
+keeping of the city," but would keep it for the king
+and his heirs. They were thereupon enjoined to prepare
+a scheme for its defence for submission to the
+king's council, and this was accordingly done.<a id="noteref_391" name="noteref_391" href="#note_391"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">391</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Letter from the Earl of Hereford and the City's reply.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The city was, however, wavering in its support;
+Chigwell did his best to hold the balance between
+king and baron, and to hold a middle course, avoiding
+offence as far as was possible to one side and the
+other. After the lapse of a few days, a letter came
+from the Earl of Hereford, addressed to the mayor,
+sheriffs, aldermen and commonalty of the city, asking
+for an interview. It was then decided, after due deliberation
+in the Court of Husting, to ask Edward's advice
+on the matter before returning an answer. At first
+the king was disinclined to allow the interview,
+but when the lords approached nearer London, and
+resistance would have been hopeless, he gave way,
+and a deputation was appointed to meet the lords at
+the Earl of Lancaster's house in Holborn. To them<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page150">[pg 150]</span><a name="Pg150" id="Pg150" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+the earl explained the aim and object of himself and
+his confederates. They were desirous of nothing so
+much as the good of the realm and the overthrow of
+the Despensers, father and son, who led the king astray
+and had caused the Iter to be held at the Tower in
+order to injure the city. Having listened to the earl's
+statement, the recorder, on behalf of the deputation,
+asked for a few days' delay in order to consult with
+the mayor and commonalty. The matter was laid
+before an assembly which comprised representatives
+from each ward (30th July), and again it was resolved
+to ask the king's advice. At length a reply was sent
+to the lords to the effect that the citizens would
+neither aid the Despensers nor oppose the lords, but
+the city would in the meantime be strongly guarded
+for the preservation of order. With this the lords
+were satisfied.<a id="noteref_392" name="noteref_392" href="#note_392"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">392</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Terms arranged between the king and the lords, 14 August.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">A fortnight later (14th August) the king, moved
+by the intercession of the Earl of Pembroke, the
+bishops, and his queen, yielded to the lords, and an
+agreement between them was reduced to writing and
+publicly read in Westminster Hall.<a id="noteref_393" name="noteref_393" href="#note_393"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">393</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Chigwell continued in the mayoralty.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Chigwell's conduct throughout met with so much
+favour from the citizens as well as from the king that
+when the latter issued letters patent<a id="noteref_394" name="noteref_394" href="#note_394"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">394</span></span></a> granting a free
+election of a mayor in October of this year, it was
+decided to continue Chigwell in office without a fresh
+election.<a id="noteref_395" name="noteref_395" href="#note_395"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">395</span></span></a></p>
+
+<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page151">[pg 151]</span><a name="Pg151" id="Pg151" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc92" id="toc92"></a>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The queen insulted by Lady Badlesmere.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Such popularity as the king had for a time
+achieved by his concession to the demands of the
+lords, however unwillingly made, was enhanced by
+another circumstance. An insult had been offered to
+the queen by Lady Badlesmere, who had refused to
+admit her into her castle at Ledes, co. Kent, when on
+her way to Canterbury. The queen was naturally
+indignant, and the unexpected energy displayed by
+Edward in avenging the insult gave fresh strength to
+his cause. With the assistance of a contingent sent
+by the citizens of London, the king beseiged the
+castle, and, having taken it, hanged the governor.<a id="noteref_396" name="noteref_396" href="#note_396"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">396</span></span></a>
+Sir Bartholomew de Badlesmere, the owner of the
+castle, was afterwards taken and put to death at
+Canterbury.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Attempt to issue a "charter of service."</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Elated with his success, the king forthwith proceeded
+to issue "a charter of service"—<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">i.e.</span></span>, a charter
+binding the citizens to serve him in future wars—which
+he wished the good people of London to have
+sealed, "but the people of the city would not accede
+to it for all that the king could do."<a id="noteref_397" name="noteref_397" href="#note_397"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">397</span></span></a> In the place
+of this charter, however, he was induced to grant
+the citizens one of a diametrically opposite nature,
+whereby it was provided that the aids granted by the
+citizens upon this occasion should not be prejudicial
+to the mayor and citizens, nor be looked upon as
+establishing a precedent.<a id="noteref_398" name="noteref_398" href="#note_398"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">398</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The Londoners at Boroughbridge, 16 March, 1322.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Having thus secured an acknowledgment of their
+rights, the citizens were ready enough to waive them<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page152">[pg 152]</span><a name="Pg152" id="Pg152" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+when occasion required. The battle of Boroughbridge
+(16 March, 1322) was won for the king by the aid
+of Londoners. We know, at least, that when he
+started from London at the close of 1321 he was
+accompanied by five hundred men at arms from the
+city, and one hundred and twenty more were sent
+after him on the 3rd March.<a id="noteref_399" name="noteref_399" href="#note_399"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">399</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The character of the citizen soldier in the field.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The Londoners were by no means to be despised
+in the field. Froissart describes them as being very
+dangerous when once their blood was up, and slaughter
+on the battle field only gave them fresh courage.<a id="noteref_400" name="noteref_400" href="#note_400"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">400</span></span></a>
+A late writer<a id="noteref_401" name="noteref_401" href="#note_401"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">401</span></span></a> who was pleased to describe the
+city's military force as "an army of drapers' apprentices
+and journeymen tailors, with common councilmen
+for captains and aldermen for colonels," gave
+it credit, nevertheless, for natural courage, which, combined
+with befitting equipment and martial discipline,
+rendered the force a valuable ally and a formidable
+enemy.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Defeat and execution of the Earl of Lancaster, March, 1322.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The Earl of Lancaster, who was made prisoner
+at Boroughbridge, and afterwards executed before his
+own castle at Pomfret, had come to be a great
+favourite with the Londoners, in whose eyes he
+appeared as the champion of the oppressed against
+the strong. His memory was long cherished in the
+city, and miracles were believed to have taken place—the
+crooked made straight, the blind receiving sight<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page153">[pg 153]</span><a name="Pg153" id="Pg153" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc93" id="toc93"></a>
+and the deaf hearing—before the tablet he had set up
+in St. Paul's commemorative of the king's submission
+to the Ordinances. Edward ordered the removal of
+the tablet, but it was again set up as soon as all
+power had passed from his hands.<a id="noteref_402" name="noteref_402" href="#note_402"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">402</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Edward again despotic, 1322-1323.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Edward, again a free ruler, lost no time in revoking
+these Ordinances. The elder Despenser he
+raised to the earldom of Winchester.<a id="noteref_403" name="noteref_403" href="#note_403"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">403</span></span></a> This was in
+May, 1322; a year later (April, 1323), he deposed
+Chigwell, who had again been re-elected to the
+mayoralty in the previous October, and put in his
+place Nicholas de Farndon,<a id="noteref_404" name="noteref_404" href="#note_404"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">404</span></span></a> thus reversing the order
+of things in 1321, when Farndon had been deposed
+and his place taken by Chigwell.</p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The deposed mayor, however, was ordered to
+keep close attendance on the Court, as were also
+three other London citizens, viz.: Hamo Godchep,
+Edmund Lambyn, and Roger le Palmere; and in the
+following November he recovered his position,<a id="noteref_405" name="noteref_405" href="#note_405"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">405</span></span></a> and
+held it for the rest of Edward's reign.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Escape of Roger Mortimer from the Tower. Aug. 1323.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The king's triumph was destined to be short-lived.
+In August, 1323, Roger Mortimer, a favourite
+of the queen, effected his escape from the Tower,
+where he had lain prisoner since January, 1322. The
+divided feeling of the citizens which had been more
+or less apparent since the year of the great Iter, now
+began to assert itself. Mortimer's escape had taken<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page154">[pg 154]</span><a name="Pg154" id="Pg154" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+place with the connivance, if not active assistance, of
+a leading citizen, Richard de Betoyne, and he took
+sanctuary on the property of another leading citizen,
+John Gisors.<a id="noteref_406" name="noteref_406" href="#note_406"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">406</span></span></a> In November the citizens thought fit
+to close their gates, to prevent surprise.<a id="noteref_407" name="noteref_407" href="#note_407"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">407</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">A feud between the Weavers and the Goldsmiths, 1324.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">In the following year (1324), a quarrel broke out
+between two of the city guilds, the weavers and the
+goldsmiths. Fights took place in the streets and
+lives were lost.<a id="noteref_408" name="noteref_408" href="#note_408"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">408</span></span></a> How far, if at all, such a quarrel
+had any political significance it is difficult to say, but
+it is not unlikely, at a time when the guilds were
+winning their way to chartered rights, that occasionally
+their members took sides in the political
+struggle that was then being carried on.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Departure of the queen for France, 9 March, 1324.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Edward, in the meanwhile, was threatened with
+war by France, unless he consented to cross the sea
+and do homage to the French king for the possessions
+he held in that country. This the Despensers
+dared not allow him to do. A compromise was therefore
+effected. Queen Isabel, who was not sorry for
+an opportunity of quitting the side of a husband who
+had seized all her property, removed her household,
+and put her on board wages at twenty shillings
+a day,<a id="noteref_409" name="noteref_409" href="#note_409"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">409</span></span></a> undertook, with the king's assent, to revisit
+her home and to bring about a settlement.
+Accordingly, on the 9th March,<a id="noteref_410" name="noteref_410" href="#note_410"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">410</span></span></a> 1324, she crossed
+over to France, where she was afterwards joined by
+Mortimer and her son.</p>
+
+<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page155">[pg 155]</span><a name="Pg155" id="Pg155" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc94" id="toc94"></a>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Her return to England, 24 September, 1326.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Once on the continent, the queen threw off the
+mask, and immediately began to concert measures
+against the king and the Despensers. By negotiating
+a marriage for her son with the daughter of the
+Count of Hainault, she contrived to raise supporters
+in England, whilst by her affected humility and
+sorrow, displayed by wearing simple apparel as one
+that mourned for her husband, she won the sympathy
+of all who beheld her.<a id="noteref_411" name="noteref_411" href="#note_411"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">411</span></span></a> The king, on the
+other hand, publicly forbade any one holding correspondence
+with her, caused provisions to be laid up in
+the Tower in case of emergency, and prepared a
+fleet to prevent her landing.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The City lost to Edward.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">It was all in vain. The majority of the citizens
+had made up their mind to give him no more
+support. On the 24th September, 1326, Isabel, in
+spite of all precautions, effected a landing near
+Harwich; and Edward, as soon as he was made
+aware of her arrival in England, took fright and left
+London for the west. The queen, who was accompanied
+by her son and her "gentle Mortimer," gave
+out that she came as an avenger of Earl Thomas,
+whose memory was yet green in the minds of the
+citizens, and as the enemy of the Despensers.<a id="noteref_412" name="noteref_412" href="#note_412"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">412</span></span></a> Adherents
+quickly came in from all sides, and with
+these she leisurely (<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">quasi peregrinando</span></span>) followed up
+the king.<a id="noteref_413" name="noteref_413" href="#note_413"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">413</span></span></a></p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">In the meantime a letter had been despatched to
+the city in her name and that of her son, desiring its<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page156">[pg 156]</span><a name="Pg156" id="Pg156" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+assistance in destroying "the enemies of the land."
+To this letter, we are told, no answer was sent
+"through fear of the king." Another letter was therefore
+sent to the same effect, in which Hugh Despenser
+was especially named as one to be destroyed, and an
+immediate answer was requested.<a id="noteref_414" name="noteref_414" href="#note_414"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">414</span></span></a> This letter was
+affixed to the cross in Cheapside and copies circulated
+through the city.</p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">On the 15th October, the city broke out into
+open rebellion. The mayor and other leading men
+had gone to the house of the Blackfriars to meet the
+Bishops of London and Exeter. The mob, now fairly
+roused by the queen's second letter, hurried thither
+and forced them to return to the Guildhall, the timid
+Chigwell "crying mercy with clasped hands," and
+promising to grant all they required. A proclamation
+was made shortly afterwards to the effect that "the
+enemies to the king and the queen and their son"
+should depart the city.<a id="noteref_415" name="noteref_415" href="#note_415"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">415</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The murder of Bishop Stapleton, 15 October, 1326.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">One unfortunate man, John le Marchall, suspected
+of being employed by Hugh Despenser as a spy,
+was seized and incontinently beheaded in Cheapside.
+The mob, having tasted blood, hastened to sack the
+house of Walter Stapleton, Bishop of Exeter, who as
+Edward's treasurer, had confiscated the queen's property.
+It so happened, that the bishop himself,
+attended by two esquires, was riding towards the city
+intending to have his midday meal at his house in Old
+Dean's Lane (now Warwick Lane), before proceeding
+to the Tower. Hearing cries of "Traitor!" he<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page157">[pg 157]</span><a name="Pg157" id="Pg157" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc95" id="toc95"></a>
+guessed that something was wrong, and made for
+sanctuary in St. Paul's. He was caught, however,
+just as he was about to enter the north door, dragged
+from his horse, carried to Chepe, and there put to
+death in the same way as John le Marchall had been
+executed a short hour before.<a id="noteref_416" name="noteref_416" href="#note_416"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">416</span></span></a></p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The bishop's two attendant esquires also perished
+at the hands of the mob. Their bodies were allowed
+to lie stark naked all that day in the middle of Chepe.
+The head of the bishop was sent to the queen at
+Gloucester,<a id="noteref_417" name="noteref_417" href="#note_417"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">417</span></span></a> but his corpse was reverently carried into
+St. Paul's after vespers by the canons and vicars of the
+cathedral. It was not allowed, however, to remain
+there long; for hearing that the bishop had died under
+sentence of excommunication, the authorities caused
+it to be removed to the church of St. Clement Danes,
+near which stood the bishop's new manor house of
+which we are reminded at the present day by Exeter
+Hall. The parish church was in the gift of the
+Bishop of Exeter for the time being, and John Mugg,
+then rector, owed his preferment to Stapleton. He
+was, therefore, guilty of gross ingratitude when he
+refused to take in the corpse of his patron, or to allow
+it the rites of burial. Certain poor women had more
+compassion; they at least cast a piece of old cloth
+over the corpse for decency's sake and buried it out of
+sight, although without any attempt to make a grave
+and "without any office of priest or clerk." Thus,
+it remained till the following month of February,
+when it was disinterred and taken to Exeter. The<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page158">[pg 158]</span><a name="Pg158" id="Pg158" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+treatment of Bishop Stapleton caused other prelates to
+look to themselves, and many of them, including the
+primate himself, began to make overtures of submission
+to Queen Isabel.</p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">After the Bishop's murder there was no pretence
+of government in the city. The mob did exactly as
+they liked. They sacked the houses of Baldock, the
+Chancellor, and carried off the treasure he had laid
+up in St. Paul's. The property of the Earl of Arundel,
+recently executed at Hereford, which lay in the
+Priory of Holy Trinity, Aldgate, shared the same
+fate. The banking house of the Bardi, containing the
+wealth accumulated by the younger Despenser, was
+sacked under cover of night. The Tower was entered,
+the prisoners set free, and new officers appointed.<a id="noteref_418" name="noteref_418" href="#note_418"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">418</span></span></a>
+All this was done in the face of a proclamation, calling
+upon the citizens to sink their differences and to
+settle their disputes by lawful means.<a id="noteref_419" name="noteref_419" href="#note_419"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">419</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The queen confirms to the citizens their right to elect their mayor, Nov., 1326.</span></div></div>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Betoyne elected mayor.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">When the Feast of St. Simon and Jude again
+came round, and Chigwell's term of office expired by
+efflux of time, no election of a successor took place,
+but on the 15th November, the Bishop of Winchester
+paid a visit to the Guildhall, where, after receiving
+the freedom of the city, and swearing "to live and
+die with them in the cause, and to maintain the
+franchise," he presented a letter from the queen,
+permitting the citizens freely to elect their mayor as
+in the days before the Iter of 1321, for since that time
+no mayor had been elected, save only by the king's<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page159">[pg 159]</span><a name="Pg159" id="Pg159" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc96" id="toc96"></a>
+favour.<a id="noteref_420" name="noteref_420" href="#note_420"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">420</span></span></a> They at once elected Richard de Betoyne,
+whom the queen had that day appointed Warden of
+the Tower, conjointly with John de Gisors.<a id="noteref_421" name="noteref_421" href="#note_421"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">421</span></span></a> Thus
+were these two aldermen recompensed for the
+assistance they had rendered Mortimer in his escape
+from the Tower.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Public declaration in favour of the queen and the City's rights. 13 Jan., 1327.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">On the 13th January, 1327—exactly one week
+before the king met his wretched end in Berkeley
+Castle—Mortimer came to the Guildhall with a large
+company including the Archbishop of Canterbury and
+several bishops, and one and all made oath to
+maintain the cause of the queen and of her son, and
+to preserve the liberties of the City of London. This
+was solemnly done in the presence of the mayor, the
+chamberlain, Andrew Horn, and a vast concourse of
+citizens. The Archbishop, who had offended many
+of the citizens by annulling the decree of exile passed
+against the Despensers in 1321, now sought their
+favour by the public offer of a gift to the commonalty
+of 50 tuns of wine.<a id="noteref_422" name="noteref_422" href="#note_422"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">422</span></span></a></p>
+</div>
+</div>
+
+<hr class="doublepage" /><div class="tei tei-div" style="margin-bottom: 5.00em; margin-top: 5.00em">
+<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page160">[pg 160]</span><a name="Pg160" id="Pg160" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+<a name="toc97" id="toc97"></a>
+<a name="pdf98" id="pdf98"></a>
+<h1 class="tei tei-head" style="text-align: left; margin-bottom: 3.46em; margin-top: 3.46em"><span style="font-size: 173%">CHAPTER VII.</span></h1>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-div" style="margin-bottom: 4.00em; margin-top: 4.00em">
+<h2 class="tei tei-head" style="text-align: left; margin-bottom: 2.88em; margin-top: 2.88em"></h2>
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Edward's charter to the city, 6 March, 1327.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Edward III was only fourteen years of age when
+he succeeded to the throne. For the first three years
+of his reign the government of the country was practically
+in the hands of Mortimer, his mother's paramour;
+and it was no doubt by his advice and that of the
+queen-mother that the young king rewarded the
+citizens of London, who had shown him so much
+favour, by granting them not only a general pardon<a id="noteref_423" name="noteref_423" href="#note_423"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">423</span></span></a>
+for offences committed since he set foot in England
+in September, 1326, but also a charter confirming and
+enlarging their ancient liberties.<a id="noteref_424" name="noteref_424" href="#note_424"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">424</span></span></a></p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">This latter charter, which has been held to be of
+the force of an Act of Parliament,<a id="noteref_425" name="noteref_425" href="#note_425"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">425</span></span></a> established (among
+other things) the ferm of the Sheriffwick of London
+and Middlesex at the original sum of £300 per annum,
+instead of the increased rental of £400 which had
+been paid since 1270;<a id="noteref_426" name="noteref_426" href="#note_426"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">426</span></span></a> it appointed the mayor one of
+the justices at the gaol delivery of Newgate, as well as
+the king's escheator of felon's goods within the city;
+it gave the citizens the right of devising real estate
+within the city; it restored to them all the privileges
+they had enjoyed before the memorable Iter of the<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page161">[pg 161]</span><a name="Pg161" id="Pg161" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc99" id="toc99"></a>
+last reign; and granted to them a monopoly of markets
+within a circuit of seven miles of the city.<a id="noteref_427" name="noteref_427" href="#note_427"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">427</span></span></a> These
+two charters—the charter of pardon and the charter
+of liberties—together with another charter<a id="noteref_428" name="noteref_428" href="#note_428"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">428</span></span></a> releasing
+the citizens from all debts due to the late king, were
+publicly read and explained in English to the citizens
+assembled at the Guildhall by Andrew Horn, the
+Chamberlain, on the 9th March.<a id="noteref_429" name="noteref_429" href="#note_429"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">429</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The City sends a contingent to assist the king against the Scots.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Scarcely was he knighted and crowned king
+before necessity compelled him to take the field
+against the Scots. The Londoners were, as usual,
+called upon to supply a contingent towards the forces
+which had been ordered to assemble at Newcastle-upon-Tyne.<a id="noteref_430" name="noteref_430" href="#note_430"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">430</span></span></a>
+They responded to the king's appeal
+by sending 100 horsemen fully equipped, each one
+supplied with the sum of 100 shillings at least for
+expenses, and a further contingent of 100 foot-men.
+They made their rendezvous at West Smithfield,
+whence they proceeded to "la Barnette."<a id="noteref_431" name="noteref_431" href="#note_431"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">431</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">This act not to be made a precedent.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Whilst furnishing this aid to the king the citizens
+were anxious that their liberality should not be
+misconstrued, or tend to establish a precedent in
+derogation of their chartered privileges. Their fears<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page162">[pg 162]</span><a name="Pg162" id="Pg162" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+on this score were set at rest by the receipt of letters
+patent from the king declaring that their proceedings
+on this occasion should not be to their prejudice.<a id="noteref_432" name="noteref_432" href="#note_432"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">432</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The City's representatives at the Parliament at Lincoln, Sept., 1327.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">A parliament held in September, at Lincoln, in
+which the citizens were represented by Benedict de
+Fulsham and Robert de Kelseye,<a id="noteref_433" name="noteref_433" href="#note_433"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">433</span></span></a> granted the king an
+aid of a twentieth to defray expenses; and Hamo de
+Chigwell, among others, was appointed by the king
+to collect the tax from the citizens.<a id="noteref_434" name="noteref_434" href="#note_434"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">434</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Petition against removing the courts and the exchequer to York.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The City's representatives were accompanied to
+Lincoln by the mayor, Richard de Betoyne, who was
+the bearer of letters under the seal of the commonalty
+addressed to the king, the queen, and members of the
+king's council praying that the courts of King's Bench
+and Exchequer might not be removed from Westminster
+to York.<a id="noteref_435" name="noteref_435" href="#note_435"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">435</span></span></a> The removal was inconvenient to
+the city merchants, whatever advantage might accrue
+to those dwelling in the north of England. Negotiations
+between the City and the king on this subject
+were protracted for some weeks; the king at length
+promising that the courts should return to Westminster
+as soon as the country was in a more settled
+state.<a id="noteref_436" name="noteref_436" href="#note_436"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">436</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Peace with Scotland, 1328.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The campaign against the Scots brought little
+credit to either side, and terminated in a treaty, the
+terms of which were for the most part arranged by<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page163">[pg 163]</span><a name="Pg163" id="Pg163" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc100" id="toc100"></a>
+Mortimer and the queen-mother. One of the articles
+of peace stipulated for the surrender of all proofs of
+the subjection of Scotland; and accordingly the abbot
+of Westminster received orders to deliver up the
+stone of Scone to the Sheriffs of London for transmission
+to Isabel, who was in the north.<a id="noteref_437" name="noteref_437" href="#note_437"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">437</span></span></a> This the
+abbot refused to do—"for reasons touching God and
+the church,"—without further instructions from the
+king and his council.<a id="noteref_438" name="noteref_438" href="#note_438"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">438</span></span></a></p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">When negotiations were opened in 1363 for the
+union of the kingdoms of England and Scotland, it
+was proposed that Edward should be crowned king
+at Scone on the royal seat (<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">siége roial</span></span>) which he
+should cause to be returned from England. These
+negotiations, however, fell through, and the stone
+remains in Westminster Abbey to this day.<a id="noteref_439" name="noteref_439" href="#note_439"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">439</span></span></a></p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The treaty which had been arranged at Edinburgh
+(17 March, 1328), was afterwards confirmed by a
+Parliament held at Northampton, in which the city
+was represented by Richard de Betoyne and Robert
+de Kelseye.<a id="noteref_440" name="noteref_440" href="#note_440"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">440</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The revolt of the Earl of Lancaster, Oct., 1328.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">When the terms of this treaty of Northampton
+(as it was called) came to be fully understood, the
+nation began to realise the measure of disgrace which
+they involved, and Mortimer and the queen became
+the objects of bitter hatred. Henry, Earl of Lancaster,<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page164">[pg 164]</span><a name="Pg164" id="Pg164" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+the king's nominal guardian, had grown weary of his
+false position, and of serving only as Mortimer's tool.
+Determined to throw off the yoke, he refused to attend
+a parliament which met at Salisbury in October
+(1328),<a id="noteref_441" name="noteref_441" href="#note_441"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">441</span></span></a> unless certain changes in the government and
+in the king's household were first made. In the meantime,
+Bishop Stratford of Winchester and Thomas,
+Lord Wake, two of his supporters, had paid a visit to
+the city and had endeavoured to rouse the citizens to
+action. The king, hearing of this, wrote to the municipal
+authorities for an explanation. They frankly
+acknowledged, in reply, that the bishop had been in
+the city for the purpose of discussing the ill state of
+affairs, and themselves expressed a hope, amid vows
+of the utmost loyalty, that the king would redress
+the grievances under which the nation suffered.<a id="noteref_442" name="noteref_442" href="#note_442"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">442</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The earl's letter to the City, 5 Nov., 1328.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Instead of attending the parliament at Salisbury,
+the earl marched in full force to Winchester. On the
+5th November he wrote to the citizens from Hungerford,
+to the effect that he had made known to parliament
+his honourable intentions, but had received no
+reply; that the parliament had been adjourned to
+London; that he had been informed of certain matters
+about which he could not write, but which the bearer
+would communicate to them; and he concluded with
+assuring them that he desired nothing so much as the
+king's honour and the welfare of the kingdom, and
+declaring his implicit confidence in their loyalty.<a id="noteref_443" name="noteref_443" href="#note_443"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">443</span></span></a></p>
+
+<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page165">[pg 165]</span><a name="Pg165" id="Pg165" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc101" id="toc101"></a>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The election of John de Grantham, mayor, in place of Chigwell.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The mayor of the city at this time was John de
+Grantham. His election had taken place but recently,
+and was the result of a compromise. Chigwell, who had
+again been chosen mayor at the expiration of Betoyne's
+year of office in 1327, was a decided favourite with the
+citizens, notwithstanding a certain want of firmness of
+character, and he was again put up as a candidate for
+the mayoralty in October, 1328. He had enemies, of
+course. Towards the close of his last mayoralty he
+was ill-advised enough to sit in judgment upon a
+brother alderman on a charge of having abused him
+two years previously. During the troublous times of
+1326, John de Cotun, alderman of Walbrook ward,
+was alleged to have described Chigwell, who was
+then mayor, as "the vilest worm that had been in
+the city for twenty years," adding that the city would
+know no peace so long as Chigwell was alive, and that
+it would be a blessing if he lost his head.<a id="noteref_444" name="noteref_444" href="#note_444"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">444</span></span></a> After some
+hard swearing on both sides, leading to the discovery
+of bad blood existing between the informer and the
+alderman, the charge was dismissed.</p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">At the outset it appeared that Chigwell's reelection
+was assured; but the city as well as the
+country was in a disturbed state, and political reasons
+may have led to an endeavour to force another candidate
+in the person of Benedict de Fulsham over his
+head. Be that as it may, it is certain that when
+Chigwell's name was proposed to the assembled
+citizens at the Guildhall, the cry was raised of
+"Fulsham! Fulsham!" So high did party spirit run,<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page166">[pg 166]</span><a name="Pg166" id="Pg166" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+that the election had to be postponed, and eventually
+it was thought best that both candidates should be
+withdrawn. This having been done, the choice of the
+electors fell on John de Grantham, a pepperer.<a id="noteref_445" name="noteref_445" href="#note_445"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">445</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The king desires a deputation from the city to meet him at Windsor, Nov., 1328.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">On the 8th November the new mayor despatched
+a letter to the king, expressing the joy of the city at
+the news of a proposed visit, and the prospect of the
+next parliament being held in London. His majesty
+might be assured of the city's loyalty.<a id="noteref_446" name="noteref_446" href="#note_446"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">446</span></span></a> Four days
+later (12 November), Edward despatched a messenger
+from Reading with a letter to John de Grantham,
+bidding him cause a deputation to be nominated for
+the purpose of proceeding to Windsor. The messenger
+arrived late on Sunday evening, and the deputation
+was to be at Windsor on the following Tuesday. A
+meeting was therefore summoned on Monday, when
+six aldermen and six commoners were nominated to
+meet the king. On Thursday the deputation returned
+and reported the result of the interview. It appears
+that Edward had complained to the deputation of
+armed men having left the city to join the earl at
+Winchester. He was also desirous to know if the city
+was in a proper state of defence and the king's peace
+preserved therein. On these points the mayor endeavoured
+to satisfy him by letter of the 18th
+November. As to armed men having left the city
+for Winchester, his majesty was informed that none
+had so left with the knowledge of the municipal
+authorities, and if any should be found to have done
+so, they would most assuredly be punished.<a id="noteref_447" name="noteref_447" href="#note_447"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">447</span></span></a></p>
+
+<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page167">[pg 167]</span><a name="Pg167" id="Pg167" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc102" id="toc102"></a>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The king pays a short visit to London, Dec., 1328.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Early in December the king and queen came to
+London, accompanied by the queen-mother and Mortimer,
+and took up their quarters at Westminster.
+The whole of the city went forth to welcome them,
+and they were made the recipients of valuable gifts.
+Their stay, however, lasted but one short week.<a id="noteref_448" name="noteref_448" href="#note_448"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">448</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The king's letter from Gloucester to the Mayor, &amp;c., of London. 16 Dec., 1328.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">By the 16th the king was at Gloucester, where
+he wrote to the Mayor of London, enclosing a copy
+of particulars of all that had passed between himself
+and the Earl of Lancaster—the charges made by the
+earl and his own replies—in order, as he said, that
+the citizens might judge for themselves of the rights
+of the quarrel between them. These particulars, the
+mayor was desired to have publicly read at the Guildhall.<a id="noteref_449" name="noteref_449" href="#note_449"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">449</span></span></a>
+This was accordingly done (20 Dec.), in the
+presence of some of the earl's supporters, who
+took the opportunity of explaining the earl's position.<a id="noteref_450" name="noteref_450" href="#note_450"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">450</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The bishops and barons in the city.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Whilst notifying the king that his wishes had
+been complied with, the mayor and commonalty
+besought him that all measures of hostility between
+himself and the barons might be suspended until
+parliament should meet. The city became the headquarters
+of the dissatisfied bishops and nobles. The
+Sunday before Christmas, the pulpit in St. Paul's was
+occupied by the primate, who was equally anxious
+with the civic authorities that matters should be left
+to be adjusted by parliament.<a id="noteref_451" name="noteref_451" href="#note_451"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">451</span></span></a></p>
+
+<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page168">[pg 168]</span><a name="Pg168" id="Pg168" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Failure of Lancaster to raise a confederation against the king. 2 Jan., 1329.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The barons in the city, in the meanwhile, awaited
+the arrival of the Earl of Lancaster. On New Year's
+day he came, and on the 2nd January (1329) a conference
+of bishops and barons took place at St. Paul's.<a id="noteref_452" name="noteref_452" href="#note_452"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">452</span></span></a>
+The futility of an attempt to form a confederation
+soon became apparent. The city stood fast to the
+king; some of the barons wavered, and nothing was
+left to Lancaster but to make the best terms he
+could. Edward had already offered pardon to all
+who should submit before the 7th January, with certain
+exceptions.<a id="noteref_453" name="noteref_453" href="#note_453"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">453</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Trial at the Guildhall of those implicated with Lancaster. Feb., 1329.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Now that the king, or rather, we should say,
+Mortimer, was once more master of the situation, the
+citizens who had favoured the constitutional party
+became the objects of retribution. On Sunday, the
+22nd January (1329), the mayor and twenty-four
+citizens were ordered to meet the king at St. Albans.
+They returned on the following Thursday with instructions
+to see if the city was prepared to punish those
+who had favoured Lancaster. No sooner were the
+king's wishes made known, than an enquiry was at
+once set on foot. On Wednesday (1st February), the
+deputation returned to the king, who was then at
+Windsor, to report the sense of the city; and on the
+following Sunday (4th February), the king's justices
+commenced to sit at the Guildhall for the trial of
+those implicated in the late abortive attempt to overthrow
+Mortimer. Three days were consumed in preliminary
+proceedings; and it was not until Wednesday
+(8th February) that the real business of the session
+commenced. By that time the king himself had<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page169">[pg 169]</span><a name="Pg169" id="Pg169" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc103" id="toc103"></a>
+come to London, and had taken up his headquarters
+at the Tower, having passed through the city accompanied
+by his consort, the queen-mother, and many
+of the nobility.<a id="noteref_454" name="noteref_454" href="#note_454"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">454</span></span></a> It does not appear that Mortimer
+came with them.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Trial of Hamo de Chigwell, 13 Feb., 1329.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Among those who were brought to trial at the
+Guildhall was Chigwell. He was accused of being
+implicated in the abduction of the Abbot of Bury St.
+Edmunds, and of feloniously receiving two silver
+basins as his share of the plunder. Being convicted,
+he claimed the benefit of clergy, and the Bishop of
+London, after some delay, was allowed to take possession
+of him on the ground that he was a clerk. His
+life was thus saved and he was conveyed to the
+episcopal prison amid general regret, although, as we
+have already seen, he was not a universal favourite.
+"Many said, he is a good man; others, nay, but he
+deceiveth the people."<a id="noteref_455" name="noteref_455" href="#note_455"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">455</span></span></a> He was kept for some
+months in honourable confinement at the bishop's
+manor of Orset, co. Essex, and early in 1330 was admitted
+to purgation. Thus encouraged, he hastened
+once more to return to the city. He was still popular
+with a large body of the citizens, who, on hearing of
+his approach, flocked to meet him, his re-entry into
+the city being made to resemble a triumphal progress.
+Both Isabel and her son were seized with alarm; and
+a writ was forthwith issued for his arrest.<a id="noteref_456" name="noteref_456" href="#note_456"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">456</span></span></a> He was,
+however, forewarned, and able to make his escape.
+Little is known of his subsequent career; Stow places
+his death in or about 1328, but this must be a mistake.
+By his will dated 1332, he left some real estate in the<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page170">[pg 170]</span><a name="Pg170" id="Pg170" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+city to the dean and chapter of St. Paul's Cathedral
+for the maintenance of a chantry.<a id="noteref_457" name="noteref_457" href="#note_457"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">457</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Execution of Mortimer, 29 Nov., 1330.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Mortimer's vengeance was not confined to a few
+leading citizens. Lancaster's life was spared, but he
+was mulcted in a heavy fine. Many of his associates
+took refuge in flight. The Earl of Kent, the king's
+uncle, was shortly afterwards charged with treason,
+into which he had been drawn by the subtlety of
+Mortimer, and made to pay the penalty with his
+head. This, more than anything else, opened the
+king's eyes to Mortimer's true character, and at length
+(Oct., 1339,) he caused him to be privily seized in the
+castle of Nottingham.<a id="noteref_458" name="noteref_458" href="#note_458"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">458</span></span></a> Thence he was carried to
+London, and hanged at the Elms in Smithfield.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The queen retires into privacy.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Queen Isabel, who witnessed the seizure of her
+favourite and whose prayers to spare the "gentle
+Mortimer" were of no avail, was made to disgorge
+much of the wealth she had acquired during her
+supremacy, and was put on an allowance. The rest
+of her life, a period of nearly thirty years, she spent
+in retirement. Before her death<a id="noteref_459" name="noteref_459" href="#note_459"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">459</span></span></a> she gave the sum
+of forty shillings to the Abbess and Minoresses of
+Aldgate of the Order of St. Clare, for the purpose of
+purchasing for themselves two pittances or doles on
+the anniversaries of the decease of her husband the
+late king and of Sir John de Eltham his son.<a id="noteref_460" name="noteref_460" href="#note_460"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">460</span></span></a> The<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page171">[pg 171]</span><a name="Pg171" id="Pg171" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc104" id="toc104"></a>
+removal of Mortimer corresponded very closely with
+the king's coming of age. He was now eighteen years
+old, and thenceforth he "ruled as well as reigned."</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Increase of trade with Flanders.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The king's marriage with Philippa of Hainault,
+which had taken place at York on the 30th January,
+1328, had been popular with the city<a id="noteref_461" name="noteref_461" href="#note_461"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">461</span></span></a> as tending to
+open up trade with Flanders. Hitherto nearly all the
+wool produced by this country had been sent to
+Flanders for manufacture, the export trade being so
+large that the king is said to have received more than
+£30,000 in a single year from duties levied on this
+commodity alone.<a id="noteref_462" name="noteref_462" href="#note_462"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">462</span></span></a> We have already seen how, in
+order to punish the Countess of Flanders for injuries
+inflicted upon English merchants, the king's grandfather
+resorted, in 1270, to the expedient of forbidding
+all export of wool to her country.<a id="noteref_463" name="noteref_463" href="#note_463"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">463</span></span></a> The misery which
+her half-starved people were then compelled to suffer
+soon induced the Countess to come to terms. It was
+also in no small measure owing to the fear of a similar
+stoppage by the intervention of the French fleet, that
+the Flemings laid aside their neutrality in 1339, and
+openly assisted Edward in his war with France.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The establishment of staples in England.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Towards the close of the last reign the "staples"
+or market towns for the sale of certain commodities,<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page172">[pg 172]</span><a name="Pg172" id="Pg172" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+but more especially of wool, had been removed from
+the continent and established at various places in England,
+Ireland and Wales.<a id="noteref_464" name="noteref_464" href="#note_464"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">464</span></span></a> London was one of those
+places. No wool was to be exported abroad until it
+had remained at one or another of the staples for a
+period of forty days. This rule appears however to
+have been relaxed by Edward II, in favour of all
+staple towns but London; merchants being allowed to
+remove their goods from other staples after a stay of
+only fifteen days. The London merchants, therefore,
+were under the disadvantage of finding the market
+always forestalled. Edward III had not long been
+on the throne before they took the opportunity of
+submitting this hardship not only to the king, but
+also to the queen-mother, and prayed that the relaxation
+of the rule touching the forty days with respect
+to other staples might be withdrawn.<a id="noteref_465" name="noteref_465" href="#note_465"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">465</span></span></a> Their prayer,
+however, would seem to have had but little effect,
+for within a week of the petition to the king we find
+that monarch issuing an order to the collector of
+customs on wool, leather and wool-fells in the port
+of London, to enforce the delay of forty days before
+goods could be removed.<a id="noteref_466" name="noteref_466" href="#note_466"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">466</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">A new tax on wool, leather, and wool-fells.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Nor was this the only grievance that the London
+merchants had. In order to raise money to put down
+the rebellion of the Scots which had broken out soon<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page173">[pg 173]</span><a name="Pg173" id="Pg173" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc105" id="toc105"></a>
+after his accession, he had recourse to an extra tax
+upon wool, leather, and wool-fells. The money thus
+raised was to be considered a loan, receipts being
+given to the merchants under the king's seal, known
+as "Coket," and the merchants in return were to be
+allowed absolute free trade from the 2nd July, 1327,
+the date of the writ, up to the following Christmas.<a id="noteref_467" name="noteref_467" href="#note_467"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">467</span></span></a>
+The Londoners objected altogether to this impost, on
+the grounds that they had never been consulted on
+the matter, and had never given their assent.<a id="noteref_468" name="noteref_468" href="#note_468"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">468</span></span></a></p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">A compromise was subsequently effected. In
+consideration of the good service which the citizens
+of London had already done to the king in times
+past, and for the good service which they were prepared
+to render again in the future, they were released
+of arrears of the tax due from 2nd July to the
+23rd September, provided they were willing to pay it
+for the remainder of the term.<a id="noteref_469" name="noteref_469" href="#note_469"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">469</span></span></a> After Christmas the
+restrictions upon free trade were again enforced.<a id="noteref_470" name="noteref_470" href="#note_470"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">470</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Proposal to remove the Staple to the continent, Feb., 1328.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">On the 11th December (1327), Edward issued a
+writ<a id="noteref_471" name="noteref_471" href="#note_471"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">471</span></span></a> to the Sheriffs of London to choose two representatives
+to attend on behalf of the citizens at a
+parliament to be held at York, on Sunday next after
+the Feast of the Purification (2 Feb., 1328). Instead,
+however, of sending only two members as directed,
+the citizens appear on this occasion to have sent no<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page174">[pg 174]</span><a name="Pg174" id="Pg174" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+less than four, viz.: Richard de Betoyne, Robert de
+Kelseye, John de Grantham, and John Priour the
+Younger.<a id="noteref_472" name="noteref_472" href="#note_472"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">472</span></span></a></p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">One of the questions to be determined was the
+advisability of again removing the Staple from
+England to the continent. On this question, there
+appears to have arisen some difference of opinion
+among the city representatives. Betoyne, who had
+formerly enjoyed the office of Mayor of the Staple
+beyond the seas, favoured a return to the old order of
+things, whilst his colleagues were opposed to any
+such proceeding. Notification of Betoyne's disagreement
+with his colleagues was made to the mayor and
+commonalty of the City by letter from the mayor
+and commonalty of York, to which reply was made
+that Betoyne's action was entirely unauthorised.<a id="noteref_473" name="noteref_473" href="#note_473"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">473</span></span></a> A
+letter was sent the same day to Betoyne himself,
+enjoining him to do nothing in the matter opposed
+to the wish of the commonalty of London<a id="noteref_474" name="noteref_474" href="#note_474"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">474</span></span></a>; and
+another to Betoyne's colleagues informing them of
+the City's action, and bidding them to exert themselves
+to the utmost to keep the Staple in England.<a id="noteref_475" name="noteref_475" href="#note_475"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">475</span></span></a></p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The account of Betoyne's difference with his
+colleagues, as related in the letter from the City of
+York, was subsequently found to require considerable
+modification, when a letter was received by the Mayor
+of London from two of his colleagues, Grantham<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page175">[pg 175]</span><a name="Pg175" id="Pg175" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc106" id="toc106"></a>
+and Priour.<a id="noteref_476" name="noteref_476" href="#note_476"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">476</span></span></a> Their account of what had actually
+taken place was to the effect that Betoyne had been
+publicly requested by a number of representatives
+from various towns, assembled in the Chapter House
+at York, to resign his mayoralty (of the Staple) and
+to deliver up the charters which had been acquired at
+no little expense. Betoyne replied that the charters
+were in the possession of John de Charleton,<a id="noteref_477" name="noteref_477" href="#note_477"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">477</span></span></a> who
+refused to give them up, but that he had himself, four
+years since, caused a transcript of the charters to be
+made, which he was prepared to give up to them if
+they so wished. Thereupon, there suddenly appeared
+upon the scene the Mayor of York, hand in hand with
+John de Charleton himself, and followed by a number
+of burgesses of York. The appearance of John de
+Charleton was eminently distasteful to Betoyne, and
+he got up and left the room, declining to take any
+further part in the discussion so long as Charleton was
+present. That was practically all that had occurred,
+and the writers expressed themselves as much hurt if
+anything more than this had been reported from the
+mayor and commonalty of York, for in their opinion
+Betoyne had never shown himself otherwise than
+diligent in his duty. The letter concluded with a
+report of general news, the chief item being the
+announcement of the death of the King of France, and
+the writers expressed a wish that the same publicity<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page176">[pg 176]</span><a name="Pg176" id="Pg176" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+might be given to their letter as was given to the
+letter received from the Mayor of York.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Betoyne's own account of his disagreement with his colleagues.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Betoyne on the same day sent home his own
+account of what had taken place at York.<a id="noteref_478" name="noteref_478" href="#note_478"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">478</span></span></a> It agrees
+in the main with the account sent by his colleagues,
+but contains some particulars of interest not mentioned
+in the latter. He relates how he had been
+asked to retire from the Mayoralty of the Staple
+beyond the seas, and to give up the charters and other
+muniments which the several towns had obtained at
+considerable cost. To this he had replied that many
+charters he had left behind on the continent, but he
+had brought over with him the charters of the franchises
+of the staples which had been purchased of the
+late king. These were in the hands of John de
+Charleton, who refused to give them up. He had
+himself, however, gone to Dover in the eighteenth
+year of Edward II, when the king himself was there,
+and had caused a duplicate of the charters to be made,
+which he had expressed his readiness to show them.
+He encloses a copy. As a proof of the bad feeling
+(<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">la malencolye</span></span>) which the burgesses of York entertained
+towards him, he proceeds to relate how the
+Mayor of York, maliciously and without any warning,
+had appeared at the assembly with four or five of his
+suite, accompanied by John de Charleton, clothed in
+the mayor's livery, and by a crowd of citizens, to
+the terror of the assembled merchants. Thereupon,
+Bretoyne had declared that he would not sit nor
+remain where Charleton was, and had left the meeting;
+for, said he, he would never make peace with
+Charleton except with the assent of the Mayor and<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page177">[pg 177]</span><a name="Pg177" id="Pg177" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc107" id="toc107"></a>
+Commonalty of London. He concluded by asking
+that his character might not be allowed to suffer by
+anything which the Mayor of York may have written.
+By a postscript he informs the Mayor of London, that
+on the eve of the Purification (the day fixed for the
+re-assembly of parliament) the Mayor of York had
+come to his hostel, accompanied by many others, and
+had accused him of having come to the city for the
+express purpose of annoying their fellow-burgess John
+de Charleton, which he had denied. This insult, he
+is advised, touches not only himself, but the Corporation
+of London whose representative he was.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Betoyne's action approved by the citizens, 19 Feb., 1328.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Both these letters were laid before the commonalty
+of London assembled at the Guildhall on the
+19th February, when Betoyne's action was approved,
+and on the following day a letter was addressed to
+him to that effect. The Mayor and Commonalty of
+York received also a missive in which their late conduct
+to Betoyne was severely criticised.<a id="noteref_479" name="noteref_479" href="#note_479"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">479</span></span></a> Betoyne's
+recent services were recognized by the grant, at his
+own request, of a handsome coverlet furred with
+minever, in part payment of his expenses incurred in
+attending the parliament at York.<a id="noteref_480" name="noteref_480" href="#note_480"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">480</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Temporary abolition of Staples. Aug., 1328.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The king, finding that the opposition to the removal
+of the staple displayed not only by London
+but by York, Winchester, Bristol and Lincoln was too
+great to be overcome, abolished staples altogether
+(August, 1328), and re-established free-trade.<a id="noteref_481" name="noteref_481" href="#note_481"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">481</span></span></a> He<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page178">[pg 178]</span><a name="Pg178" id="Pg178" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+even invited Flemish weavers to settle in England so
+as to give a stimulus to the manufacture of woollen
+fabrics. These he took under his special protection,<a id="noteref_482" name="noteref_482" href="#note_482"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">482</span></span></a>
+for the native looked askance upon all foreigners,
+traders or craftsmen.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">England and France, 1329-1331</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">One of the last political acts of Mortimer had
+been to send Edward over to France to do homage to
+Philip of Valois, the new king, for his possessions in
+that country. This homage Edward paid in 1329,
+but subject to certain reservations.<a id="noteref_483" name="noteref_483" href="#note_483"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">483</span></span></a> In 1330 he
+was making preparations for war, and took the
+opportunity of the presence of Stephen de Abyndone
+and John de Caustone, the City's representatives in
+the parliament held that year at Westminster, to ask
+them what assistance the City would be likely to
+afford him. The City members asked leave to consult
+the commonalty on the matter. Eventually the
+sum of 1,000 marks was offered, a sum so trifling
+that Edward consented to accept it only as a free
+gift, and plainly intimated that he looked for more
+substantial aid in the future.<a id="noteref_484" name="noteref_484" href="#note_484"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">484</span></span></a></p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">In July, he summoned the mayor and twenty-four
+of the leading citizens to attend him at Woodstock.
+The mayor (Simon de Swanlonde) would
+have had them excused on the ground of the disturbed
+state of the city, but the king was not to be denied.
+Substitutes were appointed for the mayor during his
+absence, and he and seven aldermen and sixteen
+commoners went to Woodstock, where they gave<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page179">[pg 179]</span><a name="Pg179" id="Pg179" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc108" id="toc108"></a>
+assurances of the City's loyalty.<a id="noteref_485" name="noteref_485" href="#note_485"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">485</span></span></a> In 1331, after
+Mortimer's fall, when Edward was his own master,
+lie again visited France, and a peace was concluded
+between the two kings.<a id="noteref_486" name="noteref_486" href="#note_486"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">486</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The war with Scotland, 1332-1335.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">From 1332 to 1335 the king was chiefly occupied
+with Scotland. It was part of the policy of Philip of
+Valois to encourage disturbance in the north of
+England, as a means of recovering his lost possessions
+in France.<a id="noteref_487" name="noteref_487" href="#note_487"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">487</span></span></a> The period of four years during which
+peace had been assured by Edward with Scotland by
+the treaty of Northampton had now elapsed,<a id="noteref_488" name="noteref_488" href="#note_488"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">488</span></span></a> and
+active operations on both sides re-commenced. In
+1334 the city voted 1,000 marks, afterwards raised to
+1,200, for raising 100 horsemen and as many men-at-arms
+to assist the king for a period of forty days.<a id="noteref_489" name="noteref_489" href="#note_489"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">489</span></span></a></p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">A spy was also despatched to Normandy and
+Brabant to see how matters were going there, and
+gifts were made to the courts of Juliers and Namur
+to secure their favour. The parliament which sat at
+York in May, 1335,<a id="noteref_490" name="noteref_490" href="#note_490"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">490</span></span></a> having decided in favour of a
+fresh expedition to Scotland,<a id="noteref_491" name="noteref_491" href="#note_491"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">491</span></span></a> the king sent orders
+to the City to hold its forces in readiness to march
+under the leadership of two of its aldermen, John de<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page180">[pg 180]</span><a name="Pg180" id="Pg180" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+Pulteney and Reginald de Conduit.<a id="noteref_492" name="noteref_492" href="#note_492"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">492</span></span></a> A commission
+to seize ships in the port of London to the king's use,
+resulted in the detention of six ships.<a id="noteref_493" name="noteref_493" href="#note_493"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">493</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Preparations for war with France, 1337.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">At length, the friendly attitude which Philip of
+Valois had taken up towards Scotland, much to
+Edward's prejudice, determined the latter to go in
+person to France for the purpose, not only of defending
+his possessions there, but also of enforcing his
+claim to the French crown. The year 1337 was devoted
+to active preparations for the struggle. The
+City of London, in spite of its franchise, was called
+upon to furnish 500 men at arms, and to send them
+to Portsmouth by Whitsuntide.<a id="noteref_494" name="noteref_494" href="#note_494"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">494</span></span></a> The date was subsequently
+altered to Trinity Sunday.<a id="noteref_495" name="noteref_495" href="#note_495"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">495</span></span></a> The king took
+occasion to find fault with the city's dilatoriness in
+executing his demands, as well as with the physique
+of the men that were being supplied. At the request
+of the mayor, Sir John de Pulteney (he had recently
+received the honour of knighthood<a id="noteref_496" name="noteref_496" href="#note_496"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">496</span></span></a>), the number of
+men to be furnished was reduced to 200, the rest to
+be supplied on further notice.<a id="noteref_497" name="noteref_497" href="#note_497"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">497</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Charter, 26 March, 1337.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">When Parliament met in London in February,
+the City made presents of money to the king, the
+queen, the chancellor, the treasurer, and others,<a id="noteref_498" name="noteref_498" href="#note_498"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">498</span></span></a> for
+no other purpose apparently, but to win their favour.
+In the following month the City obtained a charter<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page181">[pg 181]</span><a name="Pg181" id="Pg181" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc109" id="toc109"></a>
+declaring its liberties and customs to be unaffected
+by the recent statute establishing free trade,<a id="noteref_499" name="noteref_499" href="#note_499"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">499</span></span></a> when
+presents in money or kind were again made to the
+officers of state.<a id="noteref_500" name="noteref_500" href="#note_500"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">500</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The services of John de Pulteney, Mayor.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The services which the mayor had done the city
+in the work of obtaining this charter were acknowledged
+by a gift of two silver basins and the sum of
+£20 from his fellow citizens.<a id="noteref_501" name="noteref_501" href="#note_501"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">501</span></span></a> It was by Pulteney's
+influence that the king consented to allow a sum of
+1,000 marks to be taken into account at a future
+assessment for a fifteenth, instead of insisting upon its
+being a free gift from the citizens.<a id="noteref_502" name="noteref_502" href="#note_502"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">502</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The king monopolises the wool of the country.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">In March, 1337, a statute forbade the importation
+of wool, as a preliminary to the imposition of an
+additional custom, and in the following year parliament
+granted the king half the wool of the kingdom.<a id="noteref_503" name="noteref_503" href="#note_503"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">503</span></span></a>
+The Londoners having no wool of their own, paid a
+composition,<a id="noteref_504" name="noteref_504" href="#note_504"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">504</span></span></a> and were often reduced to sore straits.
+Thus in April, 1339, an assessment had to be made in
+the several wards of the City to discharge a debt to
+the king of 1,000 marks. The men of Aldersgate
+ward refused to pay their quota of £9. A precept
+was thereupon issued to the sheriffs to levy the larger
+sum of £16 10s., on the lands, tenements, goods, and
+chattels of the ward, and pay the same into the
+Chamber of the Guildhall by a certain day.<a id="noteref_505" name="noteref_505" href="#note_505"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">505</span></span></a> The
+citizens of London, and the nation generally, would<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page182">[pg 182]</span><a name="Pg182" id="Pg182" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+the more willingly have borne these exactions if any
+adequate good had resulted from them. But Edward's
+first campaign resulted in nothing more than the
+assumption by him of the name and arms of the
+King of France, at a cost of £300,000.<a id="noteref_506" name="noteref_506" href="#note_506"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">506</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Naval and military preparations in the City.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Among the ships which had been prepared for
+the king's expedition to France, three were known as
+"La Jonette," of London; "La Cogge," of All
+Hallows; and "La Sainte Marie Cogge." The last
+mentioned belonged to William Haunsard,<a id="noteref_507" name="noteref_507" href="#note_507"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">507</span></span></a> an ex-sheriff
+of London, who subsequently did signal service
+in the great naval battle of Sluys. Prior to the
+king's departure, measures were taken for the safe
+custody of the city during his absence.<a id="noteref_508" name="noteref_508" href="#note_508"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">508</span></span></a> The City had
+difficulties in raising a contingent of soldiers, for many
+of the best men had joined the retinue of nobles, and
+all that could be mustered amounted to no more than
+100 men, viz: 40 men-at-arms, and 60 archers.<a id="noteref_509" name="noteref_509" href="#note_509"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">509</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The city put into a posture of defence after the king's departure, July, 1338.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">After the king's departure (12 July, 1338) the
+City laid in provisions for transmission abroad, 500
+quarters of corn and 100 carcases of oxen to be salted
+down. In addition to which it purchased 1,000 horseshoes
+and 30,000 nails.<a id="noteref_510" name="noteref_510" href="#note_510"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">510</span></span></a> In October steps were taken
+to protect London from attack by sea and land.
+Piles were driven into the bed of the river to prevent
+the approach of a hostile fleet; the wharves were
+"bretasched" with boards, and springalds set at
+different gates and posterns.<a id="noteref_511" name="noteref_511" href="#note_511"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">511</span></span></a></p>
+
+<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page183">[pg 183]</span><a name="Pg183" id="Pg183" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc110" id="toc110"></a>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%"> Orders for city to provide more ships and men, Feb., 1339.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">In February, 1339, the citizens received the king's
+orders to furnish four ships with 300 men, and four
+scummars<a id="noteref_512" name="noteref_512" href="#note_512"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">512</span></span></a> with 160 men, victualled for three months,
+to proceed to Winchester. Upon some demur being
+made to this demand, the number of ships was reduced
+to two, well equipped with men and arms. Pursuant
+to these orders each ward was assessed for the purpose
+of levying 110 men armed with haketon, plates,
+bacinet with aventail, and gloves of plate; and sixty
+men armed with only haketon and bacinet. The pay
+of the men was to be threepence a day each for two
+months. The vessels were to be joined by ships from
+various other ports, and proceed to sea in charge of Sir
+William Trussel by the middle of March to intercept,
+if possible, the enemy's fleet.<a id="noteref_513" name="noteref_513" href="#note_513"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">513</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%"> A threatened invasion up the Thames, Easter, 1339.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">By Easter time the danger appeared more imminent,
+and the mayor and aldermen met hurriedly in the
+Guildhall, on Easter Sunday afternoon after dinner.
+An immediate attack up the Thames was expected.
+The mayor and aldermen agreed to take it in turns
+to watch the river night and day. On the following
+Wednesday, each alderman was ordered to enquire
+as to the number of arbalesters, archers, and men
+capable of bearing arms in his ward. A number of
+carpenters were sworn on the same day to safe-guard
+the engines of war laid up in the new house near
+Petywales.<a id="noteref_514" name="noteref_514" href="#note_514"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">514</span></span></a> This new house appears to have been
+known as "La Bretaske," and was used for storing
+springalds, quarels, and other war material.<a id="noteref_515" name="noteref_515" href="#note_515"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">515</span></span></a></p>
+
+<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page184">[pg 184]</span><a name="Pg184" id="Pg184" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%"> Implements of war stored at the Guildhall.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">At this period there were kept in the chamber
+of the Guildhall six instruments called "gonnes,"
+which were made of latten, a metal closely resembling
+brass, five "teleres" or stocks for supporting
+the guns, four cwt. and a half of pellets of lead, and
+thirty-two pounds of gunpowder by way of ammunition.<a id="noteref_516" name="noteref_516" href="#note_516"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">516</span></span></a>
+The mention of "teleres" and the small
+amount of ammunition favours the assumption that the
+instruments were rather hand-guns than heavy pieces,
+as has been supposed.<a id="noteref_517" name="noteref_517" href="#note_517"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">517</span></span></a> A "telere" or tiller was a
+common name for the stock of a cross-bow,<a id="noteref_518" name="noteref_518" href="#note_518"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">518</span></span></a> and the
+earliest hand-guns or fire-arms known consisted of a
+simple tube of metal with touch-hole, fixed on a
+straight stick or shaft, which when used was passed
+under the arm so as to afford a better grip of the
+weapon.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%"> The king's return, Feb., 1340.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The danger blew over, and before the close of the
+year the king was expected to return to England.<a id="noteref_519" name="noteref_519" href="#note_519"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">519</span></span></a>
+He did not return however before February, 1340,
+having intimated his intention to the mayor of London,
+by letter from Sluys, dated Sunday the 20th.<a id="noteref_520" name="noteref_520" href="#note_520"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">520</span></span></a><span class="tei tei-pb" id="page185">[pg 185]</span><a name="Pg185" id="Pg185" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc111" id="toc111"></a>
+Notwithstanding his long absence, he had accomplished
+little or nothing.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">A City loan of £5,000.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">He had come to the end of his resources and was
+in want of money to carry on the war. The City was
+asked to lend him £20,000. It offered 5,000 marks.
+This was contemptuously refused, and the municipal
+authorities were bidden to re-consider the matter, or
+in the alternative to furnish the king with the names
+of the wealthier inhabitants of the City. At length
+the City agreed to advance the sum of £5,000 for a
+fixed period, and this offer the king was fain to accept.<a id="noteref_521" name="noteref_521" href="#note_521"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">521</span></span></a>
+At the close of 1339, the chief towns of Flanders had
+entered into an offensive and defensive alliance with
+Edward, and an arrangement was made for paying
+the sum of £1,500 out of the £5,000 to Jacques van
+Arteveldt, the king's agent at Bruges.<a id="noteref_522" name="noteref_522" href="#note_522"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">522</span></span></a> Three aldermen
+and nine commoners were appointed to make
+the necessary assessment for the loan, for the repayment
+of which John de Pulteney was one of the king's
+sureties.<a id="noteref_523" name="noteref_523" href="#note_523"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">523</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The king again sets sail, June, 1340.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Provided with this and other money supplied by
+parliament, Edward again set out for the continent
+(June, 1340). With him went a contingent of 283
+men-at-arms, furnished by the City, 140 of them being
+drawn from that part of the city which lay on the
+east side of Walbrook, and 143 from the western side.
+It had been intended to raise 300 men, and the better
+class of citizens had been called upon to supply each
+a quota, or in default to serve in person; but eleven
+had failed in their duty and, on that account, had<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page186">[pg 186]</span><a name="Pg186" id="Pg186" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+been fined 50 shillings each, whilst six others, making
+up the deficit, had set out in the retinue of Henry
+Darcy, the late mayor.<a id="noteref_524" name="noteref_524" href="#note_524"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">524</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The battle of Sluys, 24 June, 1340.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The names of the transport ships and the number
+of men-at-arms supplied by each city, the number
+of mariners and serving-men (<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">garzouns</span></span>), which were
+about to take part in the great battle fought off Sluys
+(24 June), are on record.<a id="noteref_525" name="noteref_525" href="#note_525"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">525</span></span></a> Although the French fleet
+was superior to his own in numbers and equipment,
+Edward did not hesitate to attack. The struggle was
+long and severe, lasting from noon on one day until
+six o'clock the next morning. If any one person was
+more conspicuous for valour on that occasion than
+another, it was William Haunsard, an ex-sheriff of
+London, who came with "a ship of London" and
+"did much good."<a id="noteref_526" name="noteref_526" href="#note_526"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">526</span></span></a></p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">An account of the battle was despatched by the
+king to his son the Prince Regent, dated from
+his ship, the "Cogg Thomas," the 28th June.<a id="noteref_527" name="noteref_527" href="#note_527"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">527</span></span></a></p>
+</div>
+</div>
+
+<hr class="doublepage" /><div class="tei tei-div" style="margin-bottom: 5.00em; margin-top: 5.00em">
+<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page187">[pg 187]</span><a name="Pg187" id="Pg187" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+<a name="toc112" id="toc112"></a>
+<a name="pdf113" id="pdf113"></a>
+<h1 class="tei tei-head" style="text-align: left; margin-bottom: 3.46em; margin-top: 3.46em"><span style="font-size: 173%">CHAPTER VIII.</span></h1>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-div" style="margin-bottom: 4.00em; margin-top: 4.00em">
+<a name="toc114" id="toc114"></a><h2 class="tei tei-head" style="text-align: left; margin-bottom: 2.88em; margin-top: 2.88em"></h2>
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The king's unexpected return, 30 Nov., 1340.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">It was one of the conditions of the Flemish
+alliance, mentioned at the close of the last chapter,
+that the campaign of 1340 should open with the siege
+of Tournay, and it was with this object specially in
+view that Edward had set out from England. After
+his brilliant victory over the French fleet which
+opposed his passage Edward marched upon Tournay.
+Its siege, however, proved fruitless, and, disappointed
+and money-less, he slipt back again to England and
+made his appearance unexpectedly one morning at
+the Tower<a id="noteref_528" name="noteref_528" href="#note_528"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">528</span></span></a> (30 Nov.).</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Dismisses ministers and orders an enquiry as to collection of revenue.</span></div></div>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The justices at the Tower, March-April. 1341.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The king attributed the failure of the war to the
+remissness of his ministers in sending money and
+supplies. Scarcely had he landed before he sent for
+the chancellor, the treasurer, and other ministers who
+were in London, and not only dismissed them from
+office, but ordered them each into separate confinement.
+John de Pulteney was one of those made to
+feel the king's anger, and he was relegated to the
+castle of Somerton, but as soon as Edward's irritability
+had passed off he and others obtained their freedom.<a id="noteref_529" name="noteref_529" href="#note_529"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">529</span></span></a>
+A searching enquiry was instituted in the spring of<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page188">[pg 188]</span><a name="Pg188" id="Pg188" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+the following year (1341) as to the way in which the
+king's revenues had been collected in the city.
+Objection was raised to the judges holding their
+session within the city and they sat at the Tower.
+Great tumult prevailed, and the citizens refused to
+answer any questions until the judges had formally
+acknowledged the City's liberties. A special fund was
+raised for the purpose of defending the City's rights.<a id="noteref_530" name="noteref_530" href="#note_530"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">530</span></span></a>
+From the 5th March to the 17th March the justices
+sat, and then an adjournment was made until the
+16th April. On resumption of the session another
+adjournment immediately took place owing to parliament
+sitting at Westminster, and when the judges
+should have again sat, the Iter was suddenly determined
+by order of the king.<a id="noteref_531" name="noteref_531" href="#note_531"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">531</span></span></a> The king showed much
+annoyance at the attitude taken up by the citizens,
+or at least by a certain portion of them, with respect
+to this enquiry, and endeavoured to procure the names
+of the ringleaders.<a id="noteref_532" name="noteref_532" href="#note_532"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">532</span></span></a> Failing in this, and not wishing
+to make an enemy of the city on which he largely
+depended for resources to carry out his military
+measures, he bestowed a general pardon on the citizens,
+and promised that no Iter should be held at the
+Tower for a period of seven years.<a id="noteref_533" name="noteref_533" href="#note_533"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">533</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Charter to the city, dated 26 March, 1341.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">As a further mark of favour he granted to the
+City, soon after the abrupt termination of the Iter, a
+charter confirming previous charters; allowing the
+citizens in express terms to vary customs that might
+in course of time have become incapable of being put<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page189">[pg 189]</span><a name="Pg189" id="Pg189" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc115" id="toc115"></a>
+into practice, and declaring the city's liberties not
+subject to forfeiture through non-user.<a id="noteref_534" name="noteref_534" href="#note_534"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">534</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The city called upon to furnish the king with 26 ships.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">In August (1341) the citizens met to consider the
+question of levying a sum of £2,000, of which 2,000
+marks was due to certain citizens in part payment of
+the £5,000 lent to the king, and 1,000 marks was
+required for the discharge of the city's own debts. A
+certain number of aldermen and commoners were at
+the same time appointed to confer with the king's
+council touching the sending of ships of war beyond
+the seas. The result of the interview was made
+known to the citizens at a meeting held later on in
+the same month. A further grievous burden (<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">vehemens
+onus</span></span>) was to be laid upon them; they were
+called upon to provide no less than twenty-six ships,
+fully equipped and victualled at their own cost.<a id="noteref_535" name="noteref_535" href="#note_535"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">535</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The king's expedition to Brittany, Oct., 1342.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The ships were probably wanted for conveying
+forces over to Brittany under the command of Sir
+Walter de Maunay, in the following year. The king
+himself made an expedition to that country in October,
+1342, having previously succeeded in borrowing
+the sum of £1,000 from the citizens. He had asked
+for £2,000, but was fain to be content with the lesser
+sum, security for repayment of which was demanded
+and granted.<a id="noteref_536" name="noteref_536" href="#note_536"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">536</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">A truce with France for three years.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">In March, 1343, Edward returned to England,
+having made a truce with France for three years.<a id="noteref_537" name="noteref_537" href="#note_537"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">537</span></span></a>
+He was beginning to learn the value of the English<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page190">[pg 190]</span><a name="Pg190" id="Pg190" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+longbow and the cloth-yard shaft in the field of
+battle. Hitherto he, like others before him, had
+placed too much reliance on charges by knights on
+horseback. What the longbow could effect, under
+proper management, had been experienced at Falkirk
+in 1298. It had proved a failure at Bannockburn in
+1314 through bad strategy, but at Halidon Hill twenty
+years later (1333) it was again effective. It was destined
+soon to work a complete reform in English
+warfare; and the yeoman and archer were to supersede
+the noble and knight. The London burgess and
+apprentice were especially apt with the weapon from
+constant practice in Finsbury fields. Edward realised
+the necessity of fostering the martial spirit of the
+Londoners, and on one occasion (January, 1344)
+invited the wives of the burgesses to witness a tournament
+at Windsor, where they were entertained right
+royally.<a id="noteref_538" name="noteref_538" href="#note_538"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">538</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Renewal of the war in 1345.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Before the expiration of the truce Edward was
+busy with preparations for a renewal of the war.
+Four hundred London archers were to be got ready by
+Midsummer of 1344, as the king was soon to cross the
+sea; and 100 men-at-arms and 200 horsemen were to
+be despatched to Portsmouth.<a id="noteref_539" name="noteref_539" href="#note_539"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">539</span></span></a> In 1345, a royal commission
+was issued for the seizure for the king's use
+of all vessels lying in the river.<a id="noteref_540" name="noteref_540" href="#note_540"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">540</span></span></a> A further contingent
+of 160 archers was ordered to Sandwich by Whitsuntide,
+and in August the city received another order for
+yet more archers.<a id="noteref_541" name="noteref_541" href="#note_541"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">541</span></span></a> In September, the king informed
+the mayor by letter that, owing to the defective<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page191">[pg 191]</span><a name="Pg191" id="Pg191" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc116" id="toc116"></a>
+state of his fleet and the prevalence of contrary
+winds, he had postponed setting sail for a short time;
+the civic authorities were to keep their men-at-arms
+and archers ready to set out the morrow after the
+receipt of orders to march.<a id="noteref_542" name="noteref_542" href="#note_542"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">542</span></span></a> Six months elapsed,
+during which the citizens were kept under arms waiting
+for orders, when, on the 18th March, 1346, another
+letter was sent by the king to the effect that he had
+now fully made up his mind to set sail from Portsmouth
+a fortnight after Easter. The men-at-arms, the horsemen,
+and the archers, were to be ready by a certain
+day on pain of losing life, limb, and property. On the
+28th March, the archers mustered in "Totehull" or
+Tothill Fields, near Westminster.<a id="noteref_543" name="noteref_543" href="#note_543"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">543</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Expedition to France sets sail, 10 July, 1346.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The expedition did not actually sail from Portsmouth
+until the 10th July, the fleet numbering 1,000
+vessels more or less.<a id="noteref_544" name="noteref_544" href="#note_544"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">544</span></span></a> Previous to his departure,
+Edward caused proclamation to be made in the city
+and elsewhere, to the effect that the assessments
+that had been made throughout the country for the
+purpose of equipping the expedition, should not be
+drawn into precedent.<a id="noteref_545" name="noteref_545" href="#note_545"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">545</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">News of the king's arrival and success in Normandy, 3 Aug.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">On the 3rd August the regent forwarded to the
+city a copy of a letter he had received from the king,
+giving an account of his passage to Normandy and
+of the capture of various towns, and among them of
+Caen. There he had discovered a document of no
+little importance. This was none other than an<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page192">[pg 192]</span><a name="Pg192" id="Pg192" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+agreement made in 1338, whereby Normandy had
+bound itself to assist the king of France in his proposed
+invasion and conquest of England.<a id="noteref_546" name="noteref_546" href="#note_546"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">546</span></span></a> This
+document the king transmitted to England by the
+hands of the Earl of Huntingdon, who was returning
+invalided, and it was publicly read in St. Paul's
+Churchyard, with the view of stirring the citizens to
+fresh exertions in prosecuting the war. The king's
+own letter was also publicly read in the Husting by
+the regent's order.<a id="noteref_547" name="noteref_547" href="#note_547"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">547</span></span></a> The City was exhorted to have
+in readiness a force to succour the king, if need be.
+Every effort was made to raise money, and the regent
+did not hesitate to resort to depreciation of the coinage
+of the realm in order to help his father. The City
+made a free gift to the king of 1,000 marks and lent
+him 2,000 more.<a id="noteref_548" name="noteref_548" href="#note_548"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">548</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The battle of Creçy, 26 Aug., 1346.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">On the 26th August the battle of Creçy was won
+against a force far outnumbering the English army.
+The victory was due in large measure to the superiority
+of the English longbow over the crossbow used
+by the Genoese mercenaries; but it was also a victory
+of foot soldiers over horsemen. The field of Bannockburn
+had shown how easy a thing it was for a body
+of horsemen to crush a body of archers, if allowed to
+take them in the flank, whilst that of Halidon Hill
+had more recently taught the king, from personal
+experience, that archers could turn the tide of battle
+against any direct attack, however violent. Edward
+profited by the experience of that day. He not only
+protected the flank of his archers, but interspersed
+among them dismounted horsemen with levelled<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page193">[pg 193]</span><a name="Pg193" id="Pg193" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc117" id="toc117"></a>
+spears, the result being that the French were driven
+off the field with terrible slaughter.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Siege and surrender of Calais, 1346-1347.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Flushed with victory Edward proceeded to lay
+siege to Calais. His forces, which had been already
+greatly reduced on the field of Creçy, suffered a further
+diminution by desertion. The mayor and sheriffs of
+London were ordered to seize all deserters, whether
+knights, esquires, or men of lower order, found in
+the city, and to take steps for furnishing the king
+with fresh recruits and store of victuals.<a id="noteref_549" name="noteref_549" href="#note_549"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">549</span></span></a> By Easter
+of the following year, the City was called upon to
+furnish two vessels towards a fleet of 120 large ships,
+which the council had decided to fit out. All ships
+found in the port of London were pressed into the
+king's service.<a id="noteref_550" name="noteref_550" href="#note_550"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">550</span></span></a></p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">In July (1347) the king was in need of more
+recruits and provisions.<a id="noteref_551" name="noteref_551" href="#note_551"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">551</span></span></a> Calais still held out, although
+both besiegers and besieged were reduced to sore
+straits. At last it surrendered (4 Aug.). Edward
+spared the lives of its principal burgesses at the intercession
+of his queen, but he cleared the town of
+French inhabitants, and invited Londoners and others
+to take up their abode there, offering them houses at
+low rents and other inducements.<a id="noteref_552" name="noteref_552" href="#note_552"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">552</span></span></a> A truce with
+Philip was agreed on, and Edward returned home.
+For a time England was resplendent with the spoils
+of the French war—"A new sun seemed to shine,"
+wrote Walsingham.<a id="noteref_553" name="noteref_553" href="#note_553"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">553</span></span></a> Every woman of position went
+gaily decked with some portion of the plunder of the<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page194">[pg 194]</span><a name="Pg194" id="Pg194" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+town of Caen or Calais; cupboards shone with silver
+plate, and wardrobes were filled with foreign furs and
+rich drapery of continental workmanship. The golden
+era was of short duration.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The Black Death, 1348-1349.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">In August, 1348, the pestilential scourge, known
+as the Black Death,<a id="noteref_554" name="noteref_554" href="#note_554"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">554</span></span></a> appeared in England, and reached
+London in the following November. The number of
+victims it carried off in the city has been variously
+computed,<a id="noteref_555" name="noteref_555" href="#note_555"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">555</span></span></a> but all conjectures of the kind must be
+received with caution. All that is known for certain
+is that the mortality caused a marked increase in the
+number of beggars, and, at the same time, raised the
+price of labour and provisions within the city's walls
+to such a degree that measures had to be taken to
+remedy both evils.<a id="noteref_556" name="noteref_556" href="#note_556"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">556</span></span></a> Besides the losses by death, the
+population of the city and the country generally was
+sensibly diminished by the flight of numbers of inhabitants
+to the continent, with the hope of escaping
+the ravages of the plague. The king's treasury
+threatened soon to become empty, and the country
+left defenceless, if this were allowed to go on unchecked;
+he therefore ordered the sheriffs of London
+to see that no men-at-arms, strangers or otherwise, left<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page195">[pg 195]</span><a name="Pg195" id="Pg195" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc118" id="toc118"></a>
+the kingdom, with the exception of well-known merchants
+or ambassadors, without the king's special
+order.<a id="noteref_557" name="noteref_557" href="#note_557"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">557</span></span></a> Pilgrimages to Rome or elsewhere were made
+an excuse for leaving England, at a time when the
+king's subjects could ill be spared. The king endeavoured
+to limit this drain upon the population of
+the kingdom by allowing none to cross the sea
+without his special licence. The city authorities having
+negligently executed his orders in this respect, received
+a rebuke in October, 1350, and were told to be more
+strict in their observance for the future.<a id="noteref_558" name="noteref_558" href="#note_558"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">558</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">A fresh truce with France, commencing 13 June, 1350.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">On the night which ushered in New Year's day,
+1350, an abortive attempt had been made by the
+French to recapture Calais. This ill success rendered
+Philip the more willing to agree to a further prolongation
+of the truce with England. Notification of this
+cessation of hostilities was duly sent to the sheriffs of
+London.<a id="noteref_559" name="noteref_559" href="#note_559"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">559</span></span></a> Before the truce had come to an end
+Philip of Valois had ceased to live, and had been succeeded
+on the throne of France by John II.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Measures taken for the suppression of piracy, July, 1350.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The city had scarcely recovered from the ravages
+of the late pestilence, before it was called upon (24
+July, 1350) to furnish two ships to assist the king
+in putting down piracy. These were accordingly
+fitted out; the ship of Andrew Turk being furnished
+with 40 men-at-arms and 60 archers, whilst that of
+Goscelin de Cleve had on board 30 men-at-arms and
+40 archers.<a id="noteref_560" name="noteref_560" href="#note_560"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">560</span></span></a> With their aid, Edward succeeded in
+utterly defeating a Spanish fleet which had recently
+inflicted much damage on the Bordeaux wine fleet,<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page196">[pg 196]</span><a name="Pg196" id="Pg196" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+and capturing 24 large ships laden with rich merchandise.<a id="noteref_561" name="noteref_561" href="#note_561"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">561</span></span></a>
+The citizens had further to submit to a
+tax on wool and wine, in order to maintain the king's
+vessels engaged in putting down piracy.<a id="noteref_562" name="noteref_562" href="#note_562"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">562</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Charter relative to the City's gold mace, 10 June, 1354.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">In 1354 an exception was made by special
+charter of the king in favour of the City of London,
+and its sergeants were permitted to carry maces of
+gold or silver, or plated with silver, and bearing the
+royal arms. Ten years before the commons of
+England had petitioned the king (<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">inter alia</span></span>) not to
+allow any one to carry maces tipped with silver in
+city or borough, except the king's own officers. All
+others were to carry maces tipped with copper only
+(<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">virolez de cuevere</span></span>), with staves of wood as formerly.
+The petition was granted saving that the sergeants
+of the City of London might carry their mace within
+the liberties of the city and before the mayor in the
+king's presence.<a id="noteref_563" name="noteref_563" href="#note_563"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">563</span></span></a> This same year (1354), moreover,
+the king with the assent of parliament had again
+forbidden the carrying of gold or silver maces.
+Thenceforth, maces were to be of iron, brass or
+tin, or staves tipped with latten, and not to bear
+representations of the royal arms, but the arms or
+signs of the city using them. Again exception was
+made in the case of London; two sergeants of the
+City as well as of the City of York being permitted to
+carry gold or silver maces, but they were not to be
+surmounted with the royal arms. This led to a
+humble remonstrance from the whole body of the
+citizens of London, presented to the chancellor and<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page197">[pg 197]</span><a name="Pg197" id="Pg197" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc119" id="toc119"></a>
+the council by their mayor, Adam Fraunceys, and
+within a month the charter above mentioned was
+granted. That the charter originated or authorized
+the title of "Lord" Mayor, as some have supposed,
+is extremely improbable.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Renewal of war with France, 1355.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">In 1355, all efforts to convert the truce into a
+final peace having failed, war with France was renewed.
+Edward was soon called home by fresh
+troubles in Scotland. Having recovered Berwick,
+which had been taken by surprise, and formally received
+the crown of Scotland from Edward Baliol, he
+prepared to rejoin his son, the Black Prince, in France,
+and in March, 1356, ordered the city to furnish him
+with two vessels of war.<a id="noteref_564" name="noteref_564" href="#note_564"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">564</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Battle of Poitiers, 19 Sept., 1356</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">News of the battle of Poitiers (19 September,
+1356), and of the defeat and capture of the French
+king, was received in the city by letter from the
+Prince of Wales, dated 22nd October.<a id="noteref_565" name="noteref_565" href="#note_565"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">565</span></span></a> Again the
+English longbow, combined with superior tactics,
+gained the day. The prince, on his return, made a
+triumphal entry into the city, passing over London
+Bridge on his way to Westminster, with the captive
+king and the king's son in his train.<a id="noteref_566" name="noteref_566" href="#note_566"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">566</span></span></a> The streets
+were almost impassable for the multitude that
+thronged them; and for the moment the citizens forgot
+at what cost to themselves the victory had been
+gained. A truce—a welcome truce—for two years
+followed.<a id="noteref_567" name="noteref_567" href="#note_567"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">567</span></span></a></p>
+
+<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page198">[pg 198]</span><a name="Pg198" id="Pg198" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Grievances of the city laid before the king.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Only a few weeks before the prince's return the
+citizens had laid before the king a list of their
+grievances and prayed for redress.<a id="noteref_568" name="noteref_568" href="#note_568"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">568</span></span></a> They had complained
+of being charged taxes and talliages in excess
+of any other of the commons. They had lent the
+king at Dordrecht no less a sum than £60,000, and
+had incurred further loss by the discrepancy between
+the weight for weighing wool at Dordrecht and that
+of England. They had lent the king further sums of
+£5,000 and £2,000 on two separate occasions, which
+had not been repaid. The sum of £40,000 had been
+advanced to the king's merchants at Calais and elsewhere,
+and this, together with other sums lent
+(amounting to over £30,000), was still outstanding to
+the grievous hurt of many citizens. They had, moreover,
+been called upon to undergo more charges than
+others with respect to the king's expeditions to Scotland,
+Flanders and France, and in providing men-at-arms,
+archers and ships, in aid of his wars. Nor did
+their complaints stop here. The king's purveyors had
+been accustomed to seize the carriages, victuals and
+merchandise of citizens without offering payment for
+the same, in direct contravention of the king's first
+charter to the city. Owing, moreover, to deaths by
+the plague, so much property had come into mortmain
+that the city had become impoverished, and
+one-third part of it rendered void of inhabitants.
+These points they had desired the king to consider,
+inasmuch as the city had always been loyal and peaceful,
+setting an example to the whole country. The
+petition wound up with the usual complaint against
+the privileges allowed foreign merchants, and a request<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page199">[pg 199]</span><a name="Pg199" id="Pg199" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc120" id="toc120"></a>
+that the king would grant them letters patent under
+the great seal, such as they might show to the purveyors
+whenever they attempted to take anything
+without payment.<a id="noteref_569" name="noteref_569" href="#note_569"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">569</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Edward's last invasion of France, 1359-1360.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">After the expiration of the truce Edward again
+set out for France. That country, however, had
+suffered so much during the last two years at the
+hands of freebooters, that Edward experienced the
+greatest difficulty in finding sufficient provisions for
+his army. Whilst he was traversing France in search
+of a force with which to try conclusions in the field,
+a Norman fleet swept down upon the south coast and
+sacked Winchelsea. The news of this disaster so
+incensed the king that he determined to march direct
+on Paris. The Londoners, in the meantime, assisted
+in fitting out a fleet of eighty vessels, manned with
+14,000 men, including archers, in order to wipe out
+this disgrace, but the enemy contrived to make good
+their escape.<a id="noteref_570" name="noteref_570" href="#note_570"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">570</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The peace of Bretigny, 1360.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">At length Edward was induced to accede to the
+terms offered by France, and the peace of Bretigny
+was concluded (8th May, 1360). The terms were
+very favourable to England, although Edward consented
+to abandon all claim to the French crown.
+King John was to be ransomed, but the price set on
+his release was so high that some years elapsed before
+the money could be raised, and then only with the
+assistance of a few of the livery companies of the city,<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page200">[pg 200]</span><a name="Pg200" id="Pg200" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+which showed their sympathy with the captured king
+by contributing to the fund being raised for the purpose
+of restoring him to liberty.<a id="noteref_571" name="noteref_571" href="#note_571"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">571</span></span></a> It was John's high
+sense of honour that kept him in captivity in England
+until his death in 1364. He had in fact been liberated
+and allowed to return to France soon after the conclusion
+of peace, on payment of part of his ransom,
+hostages being accepted for payment of the remainder.
+In 1363 one of the hostages broke his pledge and fled,
+and John, shocked at such perfidy, returned Regulus-like
+to England. Hence it was that he appears as one
+of the four kings whom Picard, the mayor, entertained
+that same year at a banquet, followed by play at dice
+and hazard.<a id="noteref_572" name="noteref_572" href="#note_572"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">572</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">England at peace, 1360-1369.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The citizens now enjoyed a period of leisure which
+they were not slow to turn to account. The years
+which followed the peace of Bretigny, until war broke
+out afresh in 1369, witnessed the re-organisation of
+many of the trade and craft guilds. Some of these,
+like the Goldsmiths, the Tailors or Linen-Armourers,
+and the Skinners, had already obtained charters from
+Edward soon after his accession, so had also the Fishmongers,
+although the earliest extant charter of the
+company is dated 1363. The Vintners date their
+chartered rights from the same year; the Drapers from
+1364; whilst the more ancient company of Weavers
+obtained a confirmation of their privileges in 1365.<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page201">[pg 201]</span><a name="Pg201" id="Pg201" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc121" id="toc121"></a>
+Minor guilds, like the Founders, the Plumbers, the
+Fullers and others, had to content themselves with
+the recognition of their ordinances by the civic
+authorities alone between 1364 and 1369.</p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The king's favour was purchased in 1363 by a
+gift of nearly £500, to which the livery companies
+largely contributed.<a id="noteref_573" name="noteref_573" href="#note_573"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">573</span></span></a> The amount of each subscription
+varied from half-a-mark to £40, the latter sum being
+contributed by the Mercers, the Fishmongers, the
+Drapers, and the Skinners respectively. The Tailors
+subscribed half that amount, being outdone by the
+Vintners, who contributed £33 6<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">s.</span></span> 8<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">d.</span></span></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The renewal of the war, 1369.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">With the renewal of the war, a change comes over
+the pages of the City's annals. The London bachelor
+and apprentice is drawn off from his football and
+hockey, with which he had beguiled his leisure hours,
+and bidden to devote himself to the more useful pursuits
+of shooting with arrow or bolt on high days and
+holidays.<a id="noteref_574" name="noteref_574" href="#note_574"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">574</span></span></a> Once more we meet with schedules of
+men-at-arms and archers provided by the City for
+service abroad, and of assessments made on the City's
+wards to pay for them.<a id="noteref_575" name="noteref_575" href="#note_575"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">575</span></span></a> Every inducement in the
+shape of plunder was held out to volunteers for enlistment,
+and public proclamation was made to the effect
+that the spoils of France should belong to the captors
+themselves.<a id="noteref_576" name="noteref_576" href="#note_576"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">576</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">City loans, 1370-1371.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">It was an easier matter for the City to provide the
+king with money than men. In 1370 it advanced a<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page202">[pg 202]</span><a name="Pg202" id="Pg202" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+sum of £5,000,<a id="noteref_577" name="noteref_577" href="#note_577"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">577</span></span></a> and in the following year a further
+sum of £4,000, and more was subscribed by the
+wealthier citizens, among whom were William Walworth,
+who contributed over £200, Adam Fraunceys,
+Simon de Mordon, and others.<a id="noteref_578" name="noteref_578" href="#note_578"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">578</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">New form of taxation, 1371.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Still the expenses of the war exceeded the supply
+of money, and resort was had to a new form of
+taxation, by which it was hoped that a sum of
+£50,000 might be realised. By order of parliament,
+made in March, 1371, the sum of 22<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">s.</span></span> 3<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">d.</span></span> was to be
+levied on every parish in the kingdom, the number
+of parishes being reckoned as amounting to 40,000.
+It soon became apparent that the number of existing
+parishes throughout the country had been grossly
+miscalculated. There were not more than 9,000, and
+the amount of assessment had to be proportionately
+raised. It was necessary to summon a council at
+Westminster in June, to remedy the miscalculation
+that had been made in March. Half of the representatives
+of the late parliament were summoned to meet
+the king, and among them two of the city's members,
+Bartholomew Frestlyng and John Philipot—"the
+first Englishman who has left behind him the reputation
+of a financier."<a id="noteref_579" name="noteref_579" href="#note_579"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">579</span></span></a> The mistake was rectified,
+the charge of 22<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">s.</span></span> 3<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">d.</span></span> was raised to 116<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">s.</span></span> and the city
+was called upon to raise over £600.<a id="noteref_580" name="noteref_580" href="#note_580"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">580</span></span></a></p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">In the meantime the civic authorities had, in
+answer to the king's writ,<a id="noteref_581" name="noteref_581" href="#note_581"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">581</span></span></a> prepared a return of the<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page203">[pg 203]</span><a name="Pg203" id="Pg203" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc122" id="toc122"></a>
+number of parish churches, chapels and prebends
+within the city.<a id="noteref_582" name="noteref_582" href="#note_582"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">582</span></span></a> It was found that within the city
+and suburbs there were 106 parish churches<a id="noteref_583" name="noteref_583" href="#note_583"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">583</span></span></a> and
+thirty prebends, but only two of the latter were within
+the liberties. There was also the free chapel of St.
+Martin's-le-Grand, which embraced eleven prebends,
+all within the liberty of the city, and there were,
+moreover, two other chapels within the liberty.
+Besides these (the return stated) there were none
+other.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The city as an ecclesiastical centre.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The bare fact that there existed over 100 parishes,
+each with its parish church, within so small an area
+as that covered by the city and its suburbs, is of itself
+sufficient to remind us that, besides having a municipal
+and commercial history, the city also possesses an
+ecclesiastical. The church of St. Paul, the largest
+foundation in the city, with its resident canons exercising
+magnificent hospitality, was a centre to which
+London looked as a mother, although it was not
+strictly speaking the metropolitan cathedral. That
+title properly applies to the Minster at Canterbury;
+but the church of Canterbury being in the hands of
+a monastic chapter left St. Paul's at the head of the
+secular clergy of southern England.<a id="noteref_584" name="noteref_584" href="#note_584"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">584</span></span></a> Besides the
+hundred and more churches there were monastic establishments
+and colleges which covered a good fourth
+part of the whole city. The collegiate church of St.
+Martin's-le-Grand almost rivalled its neighbour the<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page204">[pg 204]</span><a name="Pg204" id="Pg204" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+cathedral church itself in the area of its precinct. The
+houses of the Black Friars and Grey Friars in the
+west were only equalled by those belonging to the
+Augustine and Crossed Friars towards the east; while
+the Priory of St. Bartholomew found a counterpart in
+the Priory of Holy Trinity. The church was everywhere
+and ruled everything, and its influence manifests
+itself nowhere more strongly than in the number of
+ecclesiastical topics which fill the pages of early
+chronicles in connection with London.<a id="noteref_585" name="noteref_585" href="#note_585"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">585</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The prosecution of the war, 1371-1375.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The war brought little credit or advantage in
+return for outlay. In January, 1371, the Black Prince
+had returned to England with the glory of former
+achievements sullied by his massacre at Limoges, and
+the City of London had made him a present of
+valuable plate.<a id="noteref_586" name="noteref_586" href="#note_586"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">586</span></span></a> The conduct of the war was transferred
+to his eldest surviving brother, John of Gaunt,
+Duke of Lancaster. In 1372 the king himself set out
+with the flower of the English nobility, and accompanied
+by a band of London archers and crossbow
+men.<a id="noteref_587" name="noteref_587" href="#note_587"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">587</span></span></a> The expedition, which had for its object the
+relief of Rochelle, and which is said to have cost no
+less than £900,000, proved disastrous, and Edward
+returned after a brief absence.<a id="noteref_588" name="noteref_588" href="#note_588"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">588</span></span></a> In 1373 the city
+furnished him with a transport barge called "The
+Paul of London." The barge when it left London
+for Southampton was fully supplied with rigging and
+tackle; nevertheless, on its arrival at the latter port,
+it was found to be so deficient in equipment that it<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page205">[pg 205]</span><a name="Pg205" id="Pg205" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc123" id="toc123"></a>
+could not proceed to sea. The only explanation that
+the master of the barge could give of the matter was
+that a certain number of anchors and cables had been
+lost on the voyage. The City paid twenty marks to
+make up the defects.<a id="noteref_589" name="noteref_589" href="#note_589"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">589</span></span></a> The year was marked by a
+campaign under Lancaster which ended in the utmost
+disaster. The French avoided a general action; the
+English soldiers deserted, and as the winter came on
+the troops perished from cold, hunger and disease.
+By 1374 the French had recovered nearly all of their
+former possessions. England was tired of the war
+and of the ceaseless expenditure it involved. It was
+with no little joy that the Londoners heard, in July,
+1375,<a id="noteref_590" name="noteref_590" href="#note_590"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">590</span></span></a> that peace had been concluded.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Charges against city aldermen, 1376.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">In April, 1376, a parliament met, known as the
+Good Parliament,<a id="noteref_591" name="noteref_591" href="#note_591"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">591</span></span></a> and before granting supply it
+demanded an account of former receipts and expenditure.
+No less than three city aldermen were charged
+with malversation. Richard Lyons, of Broad Street
+ward, was convicted with Lord Latimer of embezzling
+the king's revenue, and sentenced to imprisonment
+and forfeiture of goods.<a id="noteref_592" name="noteref_592" href="#note_592"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">592</span></span></a> Adam de Bury, of Langbourn
+ward, who had twice served the office of mayor, was
+charged with appropriating money subscribed for the
+ransom of the French king and fled to Flanders to
+avoid trial;<a id="noteref_593" name="noteref_593" href="#note_593"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">593</span></span></a> whilst John Pecche of Walbrook ward<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page206">[pg 206]</span><a name="Pg206" id="Pg206" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+was convicted of an extortionate exercise of a monopoly
+of sweet wines and his patent annulled. All
+three aldermen were deposed from their aldermanries
+by order of an assembly of citizens composed of representatives
+from the various guilds and not from the
+wards.<a id="noteref_594" name="noteref_594" href="#note_594"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">594</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">A new system of election by the guilds, instead of the wards, introduced, 1376.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The guilds, indeed, were now claiming a more
+direct participation in the government of the city
+than they had hitherto enjoyed, and their claim had
+given rise to so much commotion that the king himself
+threatened to interpose.<a id="noteref_595" name="noteref_595" href="#note_595"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">595</span></span></a> The threat was not
+liked, and the citizens hastened to assure him that no
+disturbance had occurred in the city beyond what
+proceeded from reasonable debate on an open question,
+and that to prevent the noise and tumult arising
+from large assemblies, they had unanimously decided
+that in future the Common Council should be chosen
+from the guilds and not otherwise.<a id="noteref_596" name="noteref_596" href="#note_596"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">596</span></span></a> This reply was
+sent to the king by the hands of two aldermen—William
+Walworth and Nicholas Brembre—and six
+commoners, and the following day (2 August) the
+king sent another letter accepting the explanation
+that had been offered, and expressing a hope that the
+city would be so governed as not to require his personal
+intervention.<a id="noteref_597" name="noteref_597" href="#note_597"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">597</span></span></a></p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Not only was the common council to be selected
+in future by the guilds, but the guilds were also to elect
+the mayor and the sheriffs. The aldermen and the<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page207">[pg 207]</span><a name="Pg207" id="Pg207" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc124" id="toc124"></a>
+commons were to meet together at least once a
+quarter,<a id="noteref_598" name="noteref_598" href="#note_598"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">598</span></span></a> and no member of the common council was
+to serve on inquests, nor be appointed collector or
+assessor of a talliage. This last provision may have
+been due to the recent discoveries of malversation, but,
+however that may be, it was found to work so well that
+it was more than once re-enacted.<a id="noteref_599" name="noteref_599" href="#note_599"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">599</span></span></a> These changes in
+the internal administration of the city were avowedly
+made by virtue of Edward's charter, which specifically
+gave the citizens a right to remedy hard or defective
+customs.<a id="noteref_600" name="noteref_600" href="#note_600"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">600</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The old system of election by wards reverted to in 1384.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The power of the guilds in the matter of elections
+to the common council was not of long duration.
+Before ten years had elapsed representation was
+made that the new system had been forced on the
+citizens, and in 1384 it was resolved to revert to the
+old system of election by and from the wards.<a id="noteref_601" name="noteref_601" href="#note_601"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">601</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Proceedings against Alice Perers, the king's mistress, 1376.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Encouraged by the success which had so far
+attended their efforts of reform, the good parliament
+next attacked Alice Perers, the king's mistress. Of
+humble origin, and not even possessing the quality of
+good looks, this lady, for whom the mediæval chroniclers
+have scarcely a good word to say,<a id="noteref_602" name="noteref_602" href="#note_602"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">602</span></span></a> nevertheless
+gained so complete a mastery over the king as to
+favour the popular belief that she indulged in magic.
+At length her barefaced interference in public affairs<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page208">[pg 208]</span><a name="Pg208" id="Pg208" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+led to an award against her of banishment and forfeiture.
+Upon the dissolution of the good parliament
+(6 July, 1376), and the meeting of a new parliament,
+elected under the direct influence of the Earl of Lancaster,
+who once more gained the upper hand now
+that the Black Prince was dead, Alice Perers was
+allowed to return.<a id="noteref_603" name="noteref_603" href="#note_603"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">603</span></span></a> She was again in disgrace soon
+after Richard's accession, when her property, much of
+which consisted of real estate in the City,<a id="noteref_604" name="noteref_604" href="#note_604"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">604</span></span></a> became
+escheated, and the citizens of London were promised
+redress for any harm she might have done them.<a id="noteref_605" name="noteref_605" href="#note_605"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">605</span></span></a>
+She was afterwards married to Sir William de Windsor,
+who, in 1376, had got himself into trouble over a
+disturbance in Whitefriars<a id="noteref_606" name="noteref_606" href="#note_606"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">606</span></span></a>—a quarter of the city
+which, under the name of Alsatia, became afterwards
+notorious for riots, and as the resort of bad characters.
+Towards the close of 1379 her sentence of banishment,
+never strictly enforced, was revoked and pardon
+extended to her and her husband.<a id="noteref_607" name="noteref_607" href="#note_607"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">607</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Charter forbidding free trade to merchant strangers, 4 Dec., 1376.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">In December, 1376, the citizens obtained a charter
+from the king, with the assent of parliament, granting
+that no strangers (<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">i.e.</span></span> non-freemen) should thenceforth
+be allowed to sell by retail within the city and suburbs.
+This had always been considered a grievance,
+ever since free trade had been granted to merchant
+strangers by the parliament held at York in 1335.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Hostility between the City and Lancaster.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The last year of Edward's reign was one of serious
+opposition between the City and the selfish and unprincipled<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page209">[pg 209]</span><a name="Pg209" id="Pg209" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc125" id="toc125"></a>
+Lancaster. In so far as the duke, with the
+assistance of Wycliffe, meditated a reform among the
+higher clergy, he might, if he would, have had the
+city with him. The citizens, like the great reformer
+himself, were opposed to the practice of the clergy
+heaping up riches and intermeddling with political
+matters. The duke, however, went out of his way
+to hurt the feelings of the citizens, by proposing to
+abolish the mayoralty and otherwise encroach upon
+their liberties.<a id="noteref_608" name="noteref_608" href="#note_608"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">608</span></span></a> Not content with this he took the
+occasion when Wycliffe was summoned to appear at St.
+Paul's (19 Feb., 1377), to offer violence to Courtenay,
+their bishop. This so incensed the citizens that the
+meeting broke up in confusion. The next day the
+mob, now thoroughly roused, hastened to the Savoy
+where the duke resided. He happened, however, to be
+dining in the city at the time, with a certain John de
+Ypre. The company had scarcely sat down to their
+oysters before a soldier knocked at the door and
+warned them of the danger. They forthwith jumped
+up from the table, the duke barking his shins (we
+are told) in so doing, and, making their way to the
+riverside, took boat for Kennington, where the duke
+sought protection in the house of the Princess of
+Wales. Thanks to the intervention of the bishop,
+who appeared on the scene, the mob did but little
+serious harm, beyond ill-using a priest and some of
+the duke's retainers whom they happened to come
+across.<a id="noteref_609" name="noteref_609" href="#note_609"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">609</span></span></a></p>
+
+<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page210">[pg 210]</span><a name="Pg210" id="Pg210" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Interview between the king and the citizens to explain matters.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The civic authorities were naturally anxious as to
+what the king might say and do in consequence of
+the outbreak, and desired an interview in order to
+explain matters. Lancaster was opposed to any such
+interview taking place. The London mob had seized
+upon an escutcheon of the duke, displayed in some
+public thoroughfare, and had reversed it by way of
+signifying that it was the escutcheon of a traitor.<a id="noteref_610" name="noteref_610" href="#note_610"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">610</span></span></a>
+This had particularly raised his anger. Nevertheless,
+in spite of his efforts to prevent it, an interview was
+accorded to a deputation from the city, of which John
+Philipot acted as spokesman. After drawing the
+king's attention to the threatened attack on the
+privileges of the city, and the proposed substitution of
+a "captain" for a mayor, Philipot offered an apology
+for the late riot. It had taken place, he said, without
+the cognisance of the civic authorities. Among a large
+population there were sure to be some bad characters
+whom it was difficult to restrain, even by the authority
+of the mayor, when once excited. A mob acted after
+the manner of a tornado, flying hither and thither,
+bent on committing havoc at anybody's expense, even
+its own, but, thank God! the duke had suffered no
+harm nor had any of his retinue been hurt. The king
+having listened to the deputation, assured them in
+reply, that so far from wishing to lessen the privileges
+of the city, he had a mind to enlarge them. They
+were not to alarm themselves, but to go home and
+endeavour to preserve peace. On leaving the presence
+the deputation met the duke, with whom they interchanged
+courtesies.<a id="noteref_611" name="noteref_611" href="#note_611"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">611</span></span></a> In the meanwhile lampoons on
+the duke were posted in the city. The duke became<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page211">[pg 211]</span><a name="Pg211" id="Pg211" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc126" id="toc126"></a>
+furious and demanded the excommunication of the
+authors. The bishops hesitated through fear of the
+mob, but at last the Bishop of Bangor was induced by
+representations made to him by leading citizens, who
+wished it to be known that they did not approve of
+such libels, to execute the duke's wishes.<a id="noteref_612" name="noteref_612" href="#note_612"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">612</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Another interview with the king at Shene.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The duke was determined to have his revenge, and
+again the citizens were summoned to appear before
+the king, who was lying at Shene. This time they did
+not get off so easily. The mayor, Adam Stable, was
+removed, and Nicholas Brembre appointed in his
+place. A fresh election of aldermen took place,<a id="noteref_613" name="noteref_613" href="#note_613"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">613</span></span></a> and
+the City did penance for the recent insult to the duke's
+escutcheon by offering, at the king's confidential suggestion,
+a wax taper bearing the duke's arms in St.
+Paul's. Even that did not satisfy him; nay, it was
+adding insult to injury (he said), for such an act was
+an honour usually paid to one who was dead! The
+citizens were in despair, and doubted if anything would
+satisfy him, short of proclaiming him king.<a id="noteref_614" name="noteref_614" href="#note_614"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">614</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The king's death, 21 June, 1377.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">One of the last acts of Edward was to restore the
+Bishop of Winchester to the temporalities of which
+he had been deprived by the duke, and this restitution
+was made at the instance and by the influence of
+Alice Perers,<a id="noteref_615" name="noteref_615" href="#note_615"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">615</span></span></a> who within a few weeks robbed her
+dying paramour of his finger rings and fled.<a id="noteref_616" name="noteref_616" href="#note_616"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">616</span></span></a></p>
+</div>
+</div>
+
+<hr class="doublepage" /><div class="tei tei-div" style="margin-bottom: 5.00em; margin-top: 5.00em">
+<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page212">[pg 212]</span><a name="Pg212" id="Pg212" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+<a name="toc127" id="toc127"></a>
+<a name="pdf128" id="pdf128"></a>
+<h1 class="tei tei-head" style="text-align: left; margin-bottom: 3.46em; margin-top: 3.46em"><span style="font-size: 173%">CHAPTER IX.</span></h1>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-div" style="margin-bottom: 4.00em; margin-top: 4.00em">
+<h2 class="tei tei-head" style="text-align: left; margin-bottom: 2.88em; margin-top: 2.88em"></h2>
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Reconciliation between Lancaster and the City, 1377.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Shortly after Edward had breathed his last, a
+deputation from the City waited upon the Prince of
+Wales at Kennington. John Philipot again acted as
+spokesman, and after alluding to the loss which the
+country had recently sustained, and recommending
+the City of London—the "king's chamber"—to the
+prince's favour, begged him to assist in effecting a
+reconciliation with Lancaster. This Richard promised
+to do, and a few days later the deputation again
+waited on the young king—this time at Shene, where
+preparations were being made for the late king's
+obsequies—and a reconciliation took place, the king
+kissing each member of the deputation, and promising
+to be their friend, and to look after the City's
+interests as if they were his own.<a id="noteref_617" name="noteref_617" href="#note_617"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">617</span></span></a> Formal announcement
+of the reconciliation was afterwards made at
+Westminster, and Peter de la Mare, long a prisoner
+in Nottingham Castle, was set free, to the great joy of
+the citizens.<a id="noteref_618" name="noteref_618" href="#note_618"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">618</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The coronation of Richard II, 16 July, 1377.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">At the express wish of the citizens, Richard—the
+"Londoners' king," as the nobles were in the
+habit of cynically styling the new sovereign, for the<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page213">[pg 213]</span><a name="Pg213" id="Pg213" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc129" id="toc129"></a>
+reason that he had ascended the throne more by the
+assistance of the <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">bourgeois</span></span> Londoner than of the
+nobility<a id="noteref_619" name="noteref_619" href="#note_619"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">619</span></span></a>—took up his quarters at the Tower, whence
+he proceeded in state to Westminster for his coronation.
+Great preparations were made in the city to
+tender his progress through the streets one of exceptional
+splendour. The claim of the mayor and
+citizens to assist the chief butler at the banquet was
+discourteously refused by Robert Belknap, Chief Justice
+of the Common Pleas, who bluntly told them that
+they might be of service in washing up the pots and
+pans. The citizens had their revenge, however.
+They set up an effigy of the man at a conspicuous
+arch or tower in Cheapside, in which he appeared to
+the whole of the procession as it passed on its way to
+Westminster, in the ignominious attitude of vomiting
+wine.<a id="noteref_620" name="noteref_620" href="#note_620"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">620</span></span></a> This was enough; the Londoners gained the
+day, and were allowed to perform their customary
+services at the banquet, and the mayor got his gold
+cup.<a id="noteref_621" name="noteref_621" href="#note_621"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">621</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">A city loan and parliamentary supplies, 1377.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Richard was only eleven years of age when
+raised to the throne. A council was therefore
+appointed to govern in his name. Neither the Duke
+of Lancaster nor any other of the king's uncles were
+elected councillors, and, for a time, John of Gaunt
+retired into comparative privacy. The task of the
+council was not easy. The French plundered the<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page214">[pg 214]</span><a name="Pg214" id="Pg214" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+coast,<a id="noteref_622" name="noteref_622" href="#note_622"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">622</span></span></a> and the Scots plundered the borders. Money
+was sorely needed. The City consented to advance
+the sum of £5,000 upon the security of the customs
+of the Port of London and of certain plate and jewels,<a id="noteref_623" name="noteref_623" href="#note_623"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">623</span></span></a>
+and when parliament met (13 Oct., 1377) it made a
+liberal grant of two tenths and two fifteenths, which
+was to be collected without delay, on the understanding
+that two treasurers should be appointed to superintend
+the due application of the money.<a id="noteref_624" name="noteref_624" href="#note_624"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">624</span></span></a> The two
+treasurers appointed for this purpose were two citizens
+of note, namely, William Walworth and John
+Philipot, of whose financial capability mention has
+already been made.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Charter granted to the city with the assent of parliament, 4 Dec., 1377.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Before parliament broke up it gave its assent to
+a new charter to the City.<a id="noteref_625" name="noteref_625" href="#note_625"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">625</span></span></a> Foreigners (<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">i.e.</span></span> non-freemen)
+were again forbidden to traffic in the city
+among themselves by retail, and the City's franchises
+were confirmed and enlarged. So much importance
+was attached to this charter that Brembre, the mayor,
+caused its main provisions to be published throughout
+the city.<a id="noteref_626" name="noteref_626" href="#note_626"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">626</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The subsidy taken out of the hands of Walworth and Philipot, 1378.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Lancaster soon became tired of playing a subordinate
+part in the government of the kingdom. As<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page215">[pg 215]</span><a name="Pg215" id="Pg215" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc130" id="toc130"></a>
+a preliminary step to higher aims, he contrived,
+after some little opposition, to obtain the removal of
+the subsidy granted by the last parliament, out of the
+hands of Walworth and Philipot into his own, although
+these men had given no cause for suspicion of dishonourable
+conduct in the execution of their public
+trust.<a id="noteref_627" name="noteref_627" href="#note_627"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">627</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Patriotic conduct of John Philipot.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The energetic John Philipot soon found other
+work to do. The English coast had recently become
+infested with a band of pirates, who, having already
+made a successful descent upon Scarborough, were
+now seeking fresh adventures. Philipot fitted out a
+fleet at his own expense, and putting to sea succeeded
+in capturing the ringleader,<a id="noteref_628" name="noteref_628" href="#note_628"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">628</span></span></a> a feat which rendered
+him so popular as to excite the jealousy of the Duke
+of Lancaster and other nobles. His fellow citizens
+showed their appreciation of his character by electing
+him to succeed Brembre in the mayoralty in October
+(1378).<a id="noteref_629" name="noteref_629" href="#note_629"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">629</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Factions in the City for and against the Duke of Lancaster, 1378.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The citizens were, however, split up into factions,
+one party, with Philipot and Brembre at his head, maintaining
+a stubborn opposition to Lancaster, whilst
+another, under the leadership of Walworth and John
+de Northampton, favoured the duke. These factions
+were continually plotting and counter-plotting one
+against the other. At Gloucester, to which the duke
+had brought the parliament in 1378, in the hope of<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page216">[pg 216]</span><a name="Pg216" id="Pg216" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+escaping from the interference of the "ribald" Londoners,<a id="noteref_630" name="noteref_630" href="#note_630"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">630</span></span></a>
+Brembre was arraigned on a charge of having
+connived during his recent mayoralty at an attack
+made on the house of the duke's younger brother,
+Thomas of Woodstock, Earl of Buckingham, and
+although he succeeded in proving his innocence, the
+earl and his party continued to use threats, and
+Brembre, in order to smooth matters over, consented
+to be mulcted in 100 marks. When the matter was
+reported to the Common Council at home (25 Nov.),
+that body not only signified its approval of his conduct—"knowing
+for certain that it was for no demerits
+of his own, but for the preservation of the
+liberties of the city, and for the extreme love
+which he bore it, that he had undergone such
+labours and expenses,"—but recouped him what he
+had disbursed.<a id="noteref_631" name="noteref_631" href="#note_631"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">631</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The Earl of Buckingham and his partizans withdraw themselves and their custom from the City, 1378.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">In course of time the earl and his followers succeeded
+in persecuting Brembre to a disgraceful death.
+At present they contented themselves with damaging
+the trade of the city, so far as they could, by leaving
+the city <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">en masse</span></span> and withdrawing their custom. The
+result was so disastrous to the citizens, more especially
+to the hostel keepers and victuallers, that the civic
+authorities resolved to win the nobles back to the city
+by wholesale bribery, and, as the city's "chamber"
+was empty, a subscription list was set on foot to raise a
+fund for the purpose. Philipot, the mayor, headed the
+list with £10, a sum just double that of any other subscriber.
+Six others, among them being Brembre (the<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page217">[pg 217]</span><a name="Pg217" id="Pg217" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+<a name="toc131" id="toc131"></a>
+earl's particular enemy) and Walworth, subscribed respectively
+£5; whilst the rest contributed sums varying
+from £4 down to five marks, the last mentioned sum
+being subscribed by Richard "Whytyngdon" of
+famous memory.<a id="noteref_632" name="noteref_632" href="#note_632"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">632</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Another City loan of £5,000, Feb., 1379.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The grants made to the king by the parliament
+at Gloucester were soon exhausted by the war, and
+recourse was had, as usual, to the City. In February,
+1379, the mayor and aldermen were sent for to Westminster.
+They were told that the king's necessities
+demanded an immediate supply of money, and that
+the Duke of Lancaster and the rest of the nobility
+had consented to contribute. What would the City
+do? After a brief consultation apart, the mayor and
+aldermen suggested that the usual course should be
+followed and that they should be allowed to consult
+the general body of the citizens in the Guildhall.
+Eventually the City consented to advance another
+sum of £5,000 on the same security as before, but
+any tax imposed by parliament at its next session was
+to be taken as a set off.<a id="noteref_633" name="noteref_633" href="#note_633"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">633</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The poll-tax of 1379.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">At the session of parliament held in April and
+May (1379), the demand for further supply became
+so urgent that a poll-tax was imposed on a graduated
+scale according to a man's dignity, ranging from ten
+marks or £6 1<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">s.</span></span> 4<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">d.</span></span> imposed on a duke, to a groat or
+four pence which the poorest peasant was called upon
+to pay. The mayor of London, assessed as an earl,
+was to pay £4; and the aldermen, assessed as barons,
+£2. The sum thus furnished by the city amounted
+to less than £700,<a id="noteref_634" name="noteref_634" href="#note_634"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">634</span></span></a> and the whole amount levied on<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page218">[pg 218]</span><a name="Pg218" id="Pg218" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+the country did not exceed £22,000, a sum far short
+of what had been anticipated.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Renewal of the poll-tax, 1380.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">In the following year (1380) there was a recurrence
+to the old method of raising money, but
+this proving still insufficient a poll-tax was again
+resorted to. This time, the smallest sum exacted
+was not less than three groats, and was payable on
+everyman, woman and unmarried child, above the age
+of fifteen, throughout the country. The amount thus
+raised in the city and liberties was just over £1000.<a id="noteref_635" name="noteref_635" href="#note_635"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">635</span></span></a>
+The tax was especially irritating from its inquisitorial
+character, and led to serious consequences.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The peasants' revolt under Wat Tyler, 1381.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The country was already suffering under a general
+discontent, when a certain Wat Tyler in Kent struck
+down a collector of the poll-tax, who attempted in an
+indecent manner to discover his daughter's age. This
+was the signal for a revolt of the peasants from one
+end of England to the other, not only against payment
+of this particular tax, but against taxes and
+landlords generally. The men of Essex joined forces
+with those of Kent on Blackheath, and thence
+marched on London. With the aid of sympathisers
+within the City's gates, the effected an entrance on
+the night of the 12th of June, and made free with the
+wine cellars of the wealthier class. The next day,
+the rebels, more mad than drunk (<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">non tam ebrii quam
+dementes</span></span>), stirred up the populace to make a raid
+upon the Duke of Lancaster's palace of the Savoy.
+This they sacked and burnt to the ground. They
+next vented their wrath upon the Temple, and afterwards
+upon the house of the Knight's Hospitallers at<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page219">[pg 219]</span><a name="Pg219" id="Pg219" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc132" id="toc132"></a>
+Clerkenwell. In the meantime reinforcements were
+gathering in Essex under the leadership of one known
+as "Jack Straw," and were hurrying to London. At
+Mile End they were met (14 June) by the young king
+himself, who set out from the Tower for that purpose,
+accompanied by a retinue of knights and esquires on
+horseback, as well as by his mother in a drawn
+vehicle. The rebels demanded the surrender of all
+traitors to the king. To this Richard gave his assent,
+and having done so returned to the city to take up
+his quarters at the Wardrobe, near Castle Baynard,
+whilst the rebels, availing themselves of the king's
+word, hurried off to the Tower. There they found
+Simon of Sudbury, Archbishop of Canterbury, and he
+and others were beheaded on Tower Hill. The rest
+of the day and the whole of the next were given up
+to plunder and massacre, so that the narrow streets
+were choked with corpses. Among those who perished
+at the hands of the rebels was Richard Lyons, the
+deposed alderman. At length, on the evening of
+Saturday, the 15th, when the king had ridden to
+Smithfield accompanied by Walworth, the mayor,
+and a large retinue in order to discuss matters with
+Wat Tyler (the Essex men had for the most part
+returned home), an altercation happened to arise between
+Tyler and one of the royal suite. Words were
+about to lead to blows when the mayor himself interposed,
+and summarily executed the king's order to
+arrest Tyler by bringing him to the ground by a fatal
+blow of his dagger. Deprived of their leader the mob
+became furious, and demanded Walworth's head; the
+mayor, however, contrived to slip back into the City,
+whence he quickly returned with such a force that the<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page220">[pg 220]</span><a name="Pg220" id="Pg220" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+rioters were surrounded and compelled to submit.
+The king intervened to prevent further bloodshed,
+and knighted on the field not only Walworth, but
+also Nicholas Brembre, John Philipot and Robert
+Launde.<a id="noteref_636" name="noteref_636" href="#note_636"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">636</span></span></a> The same day a royal commission was
+issued to enquire into the late riot and to bring the
+offenders to account.<a id="noteref_637" name="noteref_637" href="#note_637"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">637</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Orders given for safeguarding the city, 20 June.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Orders were given on the 20th June to each alderman
+to provide men-at-arms and archers to guard in
+turns the city's gates, and to see that no armed person
+entered the city, except those who declared on oath
+that they were about to join the king's expedition
+against the rebels. In the meantime, the aldermen
+were to make returns of all who kept hostels in their
+several wards.<a id="noteref_638" name="noteref_638" href="#note_638"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">638</span></span></a> In a list, containing nearly 200 names
+of divers persons of bad character, who had left the
+city by reason of the insurrection,<a id="noteref_639" name="noteref_639" href="#note_639"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">639</span></span></a> there appear the
+names of two servants of Henry "Grenecobbe."
+The name is far from common, and we shall not perhaps
+be far wrong in conjecturing that the owner of
+it was a relation of William "Gryndecobbe," who
+led the insurgents against the abbey of St. Albans and
+compelled the abbot to surrender its charter.<a id="noteref_640" name="noteref_640" href="#note_640"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">640</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Confession made by "Jack Straw."</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">"Jack Straw," on being brought before the mayor,
+was induced by promises of masses for the good of his
+soul, to confess the nature of the intentions of the
+rioters, which were to use the king's person as a<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page221">[pg 221]</span><a name="Pg221" id="Pg221" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc133" id="toc133"></a>
+stalking horse for drawing people to their side, and
+eventually to kill him and all in authority throughout
+the kingdom. The mendicant friars, who were believed
+to be at the bottom of the insurrection,<a id="noteref_641" name="noteref_641" href="#note_641"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">641</span></span></a> were
+alone to be spared. Wat Tyler was to be made king
+of Kent, whilst others were to be placed in similar
+positions over the rest of the counties. The mayor
+sentenced him to be beheaded. This done, his head
+was set up on London Bridge, where Wat Tyler's
+already figured.<a id="noteref_642" name="noteref_642" href="#note_642"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">642</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Revulsion of feeling against the Lollards after the suppression of the peasants' revolt, 1382.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The discontent which had given rise to the
+peasants' revolt, had been fanned by the attacks made
+by Wycliffe's "simple priests" upon the rich and idle
+clergy. The revolt occasioned a bitter feeling among
+the landlord class against Wycliffe and his followers,
+and after its suppression the Lollards were made the
+object of much animadversion. Their preaching was
+forbidden,<a id="noteref_643" name="noteref_643" href="#note_643"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">643</span></span></a> and Wycliffe was obliged to retire to his
+country parsonage, where he continued to labour with
+his pen for the cause he had so much at heart, until
+his death in 1384.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Reforms in the city during Northampton's first mayoralty, 1381-1382.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The majority of the citizens favoured the doctrines
+of Wycliffe and his followers and endeavoured to
+carry them out. The Duke of Lancaster had no real
+sympathy with the Lollards; he only wished to make
+use of them for a political purpose. It was otherwise
+with the Londoners, and with John de Northampton,
+a supporter of the duke, who succeeded to the
+mayoralty soon after the suppression of the revolt.
+Under Northampton—a man whom even his enemies
+allowed to be of stern purpose, not truckling to those<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page222">[pg 222]</span><a name="Pg222" id="Pg222" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+above him, nor bending to his inferiors,<a id="noteref_644" name="noteref_644" href="#note_644"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">644</span></span></a>—many
+reforms were carried out, ecclesiastical as well as civil.</p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The ecclesiastical courts having grossly failed in
+their duty, the citizens themselves, fearful of God's
+vengeance if matters were allowed to continue as they
+were, undertook the work of reform within the city's
+walls. The fees of the city parsons were cut down.
+The fee for baptism was not to exceed forty pence,
+whilst that for marriage was not as a general rule to
+be more than half a mark. One farthing was all that
+could be demanded for a mass for the dead, and the
+priest was bound to give change for a half-penny
+when requested or forego his fee.<a id="noteref_645" name="noteref_645" href="#note_645"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">645</span></span></a> Steps were taken
+at the same time to improve the morality of the
+city by ridding the streets of lewd women and licentious
+men. On the occasion of a first offence, culprits
+of either sex were subjected to the ignominy of
+having their hair cropt for future identification, and
+then conducted with rough music through the public
+thoroughfares, the men to the pillory and the women
+to the "thewe." After a third conviction, they were
+made to abjure the City altogether.<a id="noteref_646" name="noteref_646" href="#note_646"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">646</span></span></a> It was during
+Northampton's first year of the mayoralty that the
+citizens succeeded in breaking down the monopoly of
+the free fish-mongers. A number of "dossers" or
+baskets for carrying fish were also seized because they
+were deficient in holding capacity, and on that account
+were calculated to defraud the purchaser.<a id="noteref_647" name="noteref_647" href="#note_647"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">647</span></span></a> But,<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page223">[pg 223]</span><a name="Pg223" id="Pg223" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc134" id="toc134"></a>
+although a mayor in those days exercised, no doubt,
+greater power in the municipal government than now,
+we must be careful to avoid the common mistake of
+attributing to the individuality of the mayor for the
+time being what was really the action of the citizens
+as a body corporate.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Northampton re-elected mayor at the king's request, Oct., 1382.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">In October, 1382, Northampton was elected
+mayor for the second time, and Philipot, his rival,
+either resigned or was deprived of his aldermancy.<a id="noteref_648" name="noteref_648" href="#note_648"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">648</span></span></a>
+His re-election was at the king's express wish. On
+the 6th he wrote to the sheriffs, aldermen and commons
+of the city intimating that, whilst anxious to
+leave the citizens free choice in the matter of election
+of their mayor, he would be personally gratified if
+their choice fell upon the outgoing mayor. At first
+Northampton declined re-election, but he afterwards
+consented to serve another year on receiving a written
+request from the king.<a id="noteref_649" name="noteref_649" href="#note_649"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">649</span></span></a> His hesitation was probably
+due to the factious state of the city. Brembre and
+Philipot were not his only enemies. Another alderman,
+Nicholas Exton, of Queenhithe Ward, had
+recently been removed from his aldermancy for opprobrious
+words used to Northampton during his first
+mayoralty. A petition had been laid before the Court
+of Common Council in August, 1382, when Exton himself
+being present, and seeing the turn affairs were
+taking, endeavoured to anticipate the judgment of the<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page224">[pg 224]</span><a name="Pg224" id="Pg224" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+court, by himself asking to be exonerated from his
+office, declaring at the same time that he had offered
+a large sum of money to be released at his election in
+the first instance. The court wishing for further time
+to consider the matter adjourned. At its next meeting
+a similar petition was again presented, but the
+court hesitated to pronounce judgment in the absence
+of Exton, who was summoned to appear at the next
+Common Council. When the court met again, it was
+found that Exton had ignored the summons. Judgment
+was, therefore, pronounced in his absence and he
+was deprived of his aldermancy.<a id="noteref_650" name="noteref_650" href="#note_650"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">650</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Brembre succeeds Northampton in the mayoralty, Oct., 1383.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">At the close of Northampton's second mayoralty
+(Oct., 1383), his place was taken by his rival, Nicholas
+Brembre,<a id="noteref_651" name="noteref_651" href="#note_651"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">651</span></span></a> and a general reversal of the order of things
+took place. The free-fishmongers recovered their
+ancient privileges,<a id="noteref_652" name="noteref_652" href="#note_652"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">652</span></span></a> and the judgment passed upon
+Exton as well as a similar judgment passed upon
+another alderman, Adam Carlile, were reversed.<a id="noteref_653" name="noteref_653" href="#note_653"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">653</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Richard's second charter to the City, 26 Nov., 1383.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Soon after Brembre's election the king confirmed
+the City's liberties by charter,<a id="noteref_654" name="noteref_654" href="#note_654"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">654</span></span></a> which had the assent
+of parliament. Two years previously the citizens had<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page225">[pg 225]</span><a name="Pg225" id="Pg225" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc135" id="toc135"></a>
+besought the newly-married queen to use her interest
+with Richard to that end.<a id="noteref_655" name="noteref_655" href="#note_655"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">655</span></span></a> Her good offices, as well
+as the fact that the City had recently advanced to
+the king the sum of 4,000 marks, on the security
+of the royal crown and other things,<a id="noteref_656" name="noteref_656" href="#note_656"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">656</span></span></a> may have been
+instrumental in obtaining for the citizens this fresh
+confirmation of their rights.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Proceedings against Northampton.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">In January (1384) Northampton was bound over
+to keep the peace in the sum of £5,000;<a id="noteref_657" name="noteref_657" href="#note_657"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">657</span></span></a> but in the
+following month he was put under arrest (together
+with his brother, known as Robert "Cumberton," and
+another), for raising a disturbance in the City, and
+sent to Corfe Castle.<a id="noteref_658" name="noteref_658" href="#note_658"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">658</span></span></a> For Northampton's arrest, as
+well as for the summary execution of a certain
+John Constantyn, a cordwainer, who had been convicted
+of taking a leading part in the disturbance,
+Brembre received a letter of indemnity from the
+king.<a id="noteref_659" name="noteref_659" href="#note_659"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">659</span></span></a> The riot had one good effect. It roused
+public opinion against monopolies and restriction of
+trade to such an extent, that Richard very soon afterwards
+caused the city to be opened freely to all
+foreigners <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">(i.e.</span></span>, non-freemen) wishing to sell fish or
+other victuals.<a id="noteref_660" name="noteref_660" href="#note_660"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">660</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Trial of Northampton at Reading.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">In August (1384) the opinion of each individual
+member of the Common Council was taken on oath,
+as to whether it would be to the advantage or disadvantage
+of the city if Northampton were allowed to
+return; and it was unanimously found that his return<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page226">[pg 226]</span><a name="Pg226" id="Pg226" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+would breed dissension rather than peace and unity.<a id="noteref_661" name="noteref_661" href="#note_661"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">661</span></span></a>
+Armed with this <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">plébiscite</span></span> the mayor and a number
+of citizens, whom the king had summoned by name,
+attended a council at Reading for the purpose of
+determining the fate of Northampton. The accused
+contented himself with objecting to sentence being
+passed against him in the absence of his patron the
+Duke of Lancaster. This, however, availed him
+nothing, and he was sentenced to perpetual imprisonment
+in Tintagel Castle.<a id="noteref_662" name="noteref_662" href="#note_662"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">662</span></span></a> Another authority<a id="noteref_663" name="noteref_663" href="#note_663"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">663</span></span></a> states
+that the mayor brought with him to the council a
+man named Thomas Husk or Usk (whose name, by
+the way, does not appear in the list which the king
+forwarded to the mayor), who made a number of
+charges against Northampton. The prisoner so far
+forgot himself in the royal presence as to call Usk a
+liar, and to challenge him to a duel. Matters were
+not improved by Northampton's appeal for delay in
+passing sentence upon him in the absence of the
+Duke of Lancaster. Richard flushed crimson with
+anger at the proposal, declaring that he was ready to
+sit in judgment upon the duke no less than on Northampton,
+and forthwith ordered the latter's execution,
+and the confiscation of his goods. The sentence would
+have been earned out but for the timely intercession
+of the queen, who flung herself at her husband's feet
+and begged for the prisoner's life. The queen's prayer
+was granted, and Northampton was condemned to
+perpetual imprisonment and remitted to Corfe Castle.
+Thence, at the beginning of September, he was removed<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page227">[pg 227]</span><a name="Pg227" id="Pg227" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc136" id="toc136"></a>
+to the Tower of London, where two of his partisans,
+John More, one of the sheriffs, and Richard Northbury,
+recently arrested, were lodged.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Is committed to Tintagel Castle.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The Chief Justice, Tressilian, hesitated to take any
+steps against the prisoners, one of whom had already
+been tried and sentenced, asserting that the matter
+lay within the jurisdiction of the mayor. His scruples,
+however, on this score were easily set aside, and on
+the 10th September, each of the prisoners was sentenced
+to be drawn and hanged. No sooner was
+sentence passed than the chancellor, Michael de la
+Pole, entered on the scene, and proclaimed that the
+king's grace had been extended to the prisoners, that
+there lives would be spared, but that they would be
+imprisoned until further favour should be shown them.
+They were accordingly sent off to various fortresses;
+Northampton to Tintagel Castle in Cornwall, Northbury
+to Corfe Castle, and More to Nottingham; and
+all this arose, says the Chronicler, from the rivalry of
+fishmongers.<a id="noteref_664" name="noteref_664" href="#note_664"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">664</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Brembre's re-election to the mayoralty, Oct., 1384.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">When Brembre sought re-election to the mayoralty
+in October, 1384, he found a formidable competitor in
+Nicholas Twyford, with whom he had not always
+been on the best of terms. It was in 1378, when
+Twyford was sheriff and Brembre was occupying the
+mayoralty chair for the first time, that they fell out,
+the occasion being one of those trade disputes so
+frequent in the City's annals. A number of goldsmiths
+and pepperers had come to loggerheads in
+St. Paul's Churchyard during sermon time, and the<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page228">[pg 228]</span><a name="Pg228" id="Pg228" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+mayor had committed one of the ringleaders to the
+compter. The culprit, however, happened to be, like
+Twyford, a goldsmith, and was one of his suite.
+Twyford resented his man being sent to prison, and
+for his pains got arrested himself.<a id="noteref_665" name="noteref_665" href="#note_665"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">665</span></span></a> It was felt that
+the election would be hotly contested and might
+lead to disturbance. Besides the customary precept
+issued by the mayor forbidding any to appear who
+were not specially summoned,<a id="noteref_666" name="noteref_666" href="#note_666"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">666</span></span></a> the king took the
+precaution of sending John de Nevill, of Roby, to
+the Guildhall to see that the election was properly
+conducted. In spite of all precautions, however, a
+disturbance took place, and some of the rioters were
+afterwards bound over to keep the peace.<a id="noteref_667" name="noteref_667" href="#note_667"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">667</span></span></a> It is
+said that Brembre himself secreted a body of men
+in the neighbourhood of the Guildhall, and that
+when he found the election going against him, he
+signalled for them, and Twyford's supporters were
+compelled to flee for safety, and that thus the election
+was won.<a id="noteref_668" name="noteref_668" href="#note_668"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">668</span></span></a> Nothing of this appears in the City's
+Records, where Brembre's re-election is entered in the
+manner of the day.<a id="noteref_669" name="noteref_669" href="#note_669"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">669</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Renewed efforts to obtain Northampton's release, March, 1386.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">In 1385 Brembre was again elected mayor, and
+continued in office until October, 1386, when he was
+succeeded by his friend and ally, Nicholas Exton.
+This was the fourth and last time Brembre was
+mayor. In the meantime, the Duke of Lancaster
+and his party had renewed their efforts to effect the
+release of Northampton and of his fellow prisoners,<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page229">[pg 229]</span><a name="Pg229" id="Pg229" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc137" id="toc137"></a>
+More and Northbury, on the understanding that they
+were not to come near the City, and Brembre again
+took the opinion of the aldermen and commons
+severally as to the probable effect of the release of
+the prisoners. This occurred in March, 1386, when it
+was unanimously resolved that danger would result
+to the city if Northampton was allowed to come
+within 100 miles of it.<a id="noteref_670" name="noteref_670" href="#note_670"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">670</span></span></a> The resolution caused much
+annoyance to the duke, who characterised it as unreasonable
+and outrageous, and led to some heated
+correspondence.<a id="noteref_671" name="noteref_671" href="#note_671"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">671</span></span></a> It had, however, the desired effect
+of at least postponing the release of the prisoners.<a id="noteref_672" name="noteref_672" href="#note_672"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">672</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">A book of ordinances, known as "Jubilee," burnt by order of
+mayor, Exton, March, 1387.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">A few months after Exton had taken Brembre's
+place as mayor (Oct., 1386), the new mayor
+raised a commotion by ordering a book called
+"Jubilee," which Northampton is supposed to have
+compiled—or caused to be compiled for the better
+government of the City, to be publicly burnt in Guildhall
+yard.<a id="noteref_673" name="noteref_673" href="#note_673"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">673</span></span></a> The cordwainers of London, staunch
+supporters of Northampton (the leader of the riot
+which led to Northampton's arrest in 1384 was a
+cordwainer), complained to parliament of Exton.
+The book, said they, " comprised all the good
+articles pertaining to the good government of the
+City," which Exton and all the aldermen had sworn
+to maintain for ever, and now he and his accomplices
+had burnt it without consent of the commons, to the
+annihilation of many good liberties, franchises, and<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page230">[pg 230]</span><a name="Pg230" id="Pg230" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+customs of the City.<a id="noteref_674" name="noteref_674" href="#note_674"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">674</span></span></a> The book had already been
+subjected to revision in June, 1384, when Brembre
+was mayor;<a id="noteref_675" name="noteref_675" href="#note_675"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">675</span></span></a> it was now utterly destroyed.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Further efforts to secure Northampton's release, 1387.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">In 1387 efforts were again made to secure
+Northampton's release, and this time with success.
+On the 17th April Exton reported to the Common
+Council that Lord Zouche was actually engaged in
+canvassing the king for the release of Northampton
+and his allies. The Council thereupon unanimously
+resolved to send a letter to Lord Zouche, on behalf
+of the entire commonalty of the City, praying him to
+desist from his suit, and assuring him of their loyalty
+to the king even unto death.<a id="noteref_676" name="noteref_676" href="#note_676"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">676</span></span></a> It also resolved to
+send a deputation on horseback to the king, who was
+at "Esthamstede," to ask his favour for the City, and
+to beg of him not to annul the charters which he had
+already given to the citizens, more especially as touching
+the release of the prisoners in question.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Northampton set free, 27 April, 1387.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">On the 4th May the Recorder, William Cheyne,
+reported to the Common Council assembled in the
+upper chamber of the Guildhall the result of the
+interview with the king. The deputation had been
+received most graciously, and the mayor had been
+particularly successful in his speech, setting forth the
+dangers that would inevitably ensue, both to the king
+and to the city, if pardon were granted to Northampton
+and his friends. The king had replied that he
+would take good precautions for himself before he<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page231">[pg 231]</span><a name="Pg231" id="Pg231" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc138" id="toc138"></a>
+granted them their liberty;<a id="noteref_677" name="noteref_677" href="#note_677"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">677</span></span></a> and with this answer
+the citizens had to be content. The answer was an
+evasive one, if it be true, as one authority states,
+that on the 27th April—the day on which the mayor
+had informed the citizens of the intervention of
+Lord Zouche—Northampton had received his pardon
+and been restored to his property.<a id="noteref_678" name="noteref_678" href="#note_678"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">678</span></span></a> His friends remained
+still unsatisfied, and plagued the king for
+more favourable terms to such a degree that Richard
+ordered (7 Oct.) proclamation to be made in the city
+against any further entreaties being made to him on
+the subject.<a id="noteref_679" name="noteref_679" href="#note_679"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">679</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Letter from the mayor to the king, 5 Oct.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Two days before the order for this proclamation,
+the king was informed by letter of the nature of a
+fresh oath of allegiance<a id="noteref_680" name="noteref_680" href="#note_680"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">680</span></span></a> that had been taken by the
+mayor, aldermen, and commonalty of the city. He
+was furthermore exhorted to give credence to what
+Nicholas Brembre might inform him as to the state
+and government of the city, since there was no one
+better informed than Brembre on the subject.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The king's reply, 7 Oct.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">To this the king sent a gracious reply.<a id="noteref_681" name="noteref_681" href="#note_681"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">681</span></span></a> He had
+learnt with much pleasure from Nicholas Brembre of
+the allegiance of the citizens, which he trusted would<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page232">[pg 232]</span><a name="Pg232" id="Pg232" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+continue, as he would soon have good reason for paying
+a visit to the city in person. He had heard that
+the new sheriffs were good and trusty men, and he
+expressed a hope that at the approaching election of a
+mayor they would choose one of whom he could
+approve, otherwise he would decline to receive the
+mayor-elect at his presentation. He not only forbade
+any further entreaties to be made to him touching
+Northampton, More and Northbury, but commissioned
+enquiry to be made as to their property in the city.
+He was especially gratified to learn that, in accordance
+with his request, they had appointed Thomas Usk (the
+chief witness against Northampton) to the office of
+under-sheriff, and promised that such appointment
+should not be drawn into precedent. The citizens
+were not slow to take the hint about the election of a
+new mayor, and Exton was continued in office.<a id="noteref_682" name="noteref_682" href="#note_682"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">682</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The Parliament of 1386.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Great discontent had arisen meanwhile in the
+country at the lavish expenditure of the king, without
+any apparent result in victories abroad, such as had
+been gained in the glorious days of his predecessor.
+A cry for reform and retrenchment was raised, and
+found a champion in the person of the Duke of Gloucester,
+the youngest of the king's uncles. At his instigation,
+the parliament which assembled on the 1st
+October, 1386, demanded the dismissal of the king's
+ministers, and read him a lesson on constitutional
+government which ended in a threat of deposition
+unless the king should mend his ways. Richard was at
+the time only twenty-one years of age. In the impetuosity
+of his youth he is recorded as having contemplated
+a dastardly attempt upon the life of his uncle,<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page233">[pg 233]</span><a name="Pg233" id="Pg233" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc139" id="toc139"></a>
+whom he had grown to hate as the cause of all his
+difficulties. A plan was laid, which is said to have
+received Brembre's approbation, for beguiling the duke
+into the city by an invitation to supper, and then and
+there making away with him, but the duke was forewarned.
+The chronicler who records Brembre's complicity
+in this nefarious design against Gloucester's life
+also relates that Exton, who was mayor, refused to
+have anything to do with it.<a id="noteref_683" name="noteref_683" href="#note_683"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">683</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Appointment of a Commission of Regency.</span></div></div>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The Commission declared illegal.</span></div></div>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Richard applies to the City for assistance.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Before the end of the session, parliament had
+appointed a commission, with Gloucester at its head,
+to regulate the government of the country and the
+king's household. This very naturally excited the
+wrath of the hot-headed king, who immediately set to
+work to form a party in opposition to the duke. In
+August of the next year (1387) he obtained a declaration
+from five of the justices to the effect that the
+commission was illegal. On the 28th October he
+sent the Archbishop of York and the Earl of Suffolk
+into the city to learn whether he could depend upon
+the support of the citizens. The answer could not
+have been regarded as unfavourable, for, on the 10th
+November, the king paid a personal visit to the city
+and was received with great ceremony.<a id="noteref_684" name="noteref_684" href="#note_684"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">684</span></span></a> On the
+following day (11 Nov.) orders were given to the
+aldermen of the City to assemble the men of their
+several wards, to see that they were suitably armed
+according to their rank and estate, and to make a
+return of the same in due course.<a id="noteref_685" name="noteref_685" href="#note_685"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">685</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The king's advisers charged with treason, 14 Nov.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">On the 14th Gloucester formally charged the
+king's five counsellors—the Archbishop of York, the<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page234">[pg 234]</span><a name="Pg234" id="Pg234" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+Duke of Ireland, the Earl of Suffolk, Chief Justice
+Tressilian and Nicholas Brembre, "the false London
+knight," with treason.<a id="noteref_686" name="noteref_686" href="#note_686"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">686</span></span></a> The king retaliated by causing
+proclamation to be made to the effect that he had
+taken these same individuals under his own protection,
+and that no one should harm them save at his
+own peril. This protection was extended also to the
+king's uncle, the Duke of Gloucester, and the Earls of
+Arundel and Warwick, the impeaching parties.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The mayor and aldermen summoned to Windsor, 28 Nov.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">On the 28th the mayor and aldermen were
+summoned to proceed to Windsor forthwith, to consult
+upon certain matters very weighty (<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">certeines
+treschargeauntes matirs</span></span>).<a id="noteref_687" name="noteref_687" href="#note_687"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">687</span></span></a> The City's archives contain
+no record of what took place at the interview, but it
+appears that the object of the conference was to ascertain
+how many men-at-arms the city would be likely
+to furnish the king at a crisis. The answer given by
+the mayor was not encouraging; the citizens were
+merchants and craftsmen, and not soldiers, save for
+the defence of the city itself; and the mayor straightway
+asked the king's permission to resign his office.<a id="noteref_688" name="noteref_688" href="#note_688"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">688</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Richard obliged to submit.</span></div></div>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Flight of the accused.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Finding that he could not rely on any assistance
+from the Londoners—whom Walsingham describes as
+fickle as a reed, siding at one time with the lords and
+at another time with the king<a id="noteref_689" name="noteref_689" href="#note_689"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">689</span></span></a>—Richard was driven
+to temporise. He had already promised that in the
+next parliament his unfortunate advisers should be
+called to account, but long before parliament met<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page235">[pg 235]</span><a name="Pg235" id="Pg235" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc140" id="toc140"></a>
+(3 Feb., 1388), four out of the five culprits had made
+good their escape—at least for a time. Brembre alone
+was taken.<a id="noteref_690" name="noteref_690" href="#note_690"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">690</span></span></a> He had anticipated the blow by making
+over all his property at home and abroad to certain
+parties by deed, dated the 15th October, 1387, no
+doubt, upon a secret trust.<a id="noteref_691" name="noteref_691" href="#note_691"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">691</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The lords appellant admitted into the city, Dec., 1387.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Notwithstanding the evident coolness of the
+citizens towards him, Richard determined to leave
+Windsor and spend Christmas at the Tower. He would
+be safer there, and less subject to the dominating
+influence of the Duke of Gloucester and the Earls of
+Arundel, Nottingham, Warwick and Derby, who objected
+to his shaking off the fetters of the commission.
+As soon as his intention was known, these five lords—who,
+from having been associated in appealing against
+Richard's counsellors, were styled "appellant"—hastened
+to London, and drawing up their forces outside
+the city's walls, demanded admittance. After some
+little hesitation, the mayor determined to admit them,
+defending his action to the king by declaring that they
+were his true liege men and friends of the realm.<a id="noteref_692" name="noteref_692" href="#note_692"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">692</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The lords at the Guildhall, 18 Jan., 1388.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">On the 18th January, 1388, the lords appeared at
+the Guildhall, accompanied by the Archbishop, the
+Bishops of Ely, Hereford, Exeter, and others. The
+Archbishop absolved the citizens of their oaths of
+allegiance, whilst the Bishop of Ely, the lord treasurer,
+deprecated any remarks made to the disparagement
+of the lords. The lords and the bishops had been
+indicted on an iniquitous charge, and there were some<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page236">[pg 236]</span><a name="Pg236" id="Pg236" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+among the citizens who had been similarly indicted,
+but whether justly or unjustly he (the bishop) could
+not say. That would be decided by parliament. In
+the meantime they were ready to assist in settling the
+trade disputes in the city, for it was absurd for one
+body of the citizens to attempt to exterminate another.
+The citizens, however, showed no desire to accept the
+proffered mediation.<a id="noteref_693" name="noteref_693" href="#note_693"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">693</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Trial of Brembre before parliament, Feb., 1388.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">When parliament met (3 Feb.), a formidable
+indictment of thirty-nine charges was laid against
+the king's late advisers, of whom Brembre alone
+appeared. On the 17th February, he was brought up
+by the constable of the Tower, and was called on to
+answer off-hand the several charges of treason alleged
+against him. He prayed for time to take counsel's
+advice. This being refused, he claimed to support his
+cause by wager of battle, and immediately the whole
+company of lords, knights, esquires, and commons,
+flung down their gages so thick, we are told, that they
+"seemed like snow on a winter's day."<a id="noteref_694" name="noteref_694" href="#note_694"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">694</span></span></a> But the
+lords declared that wager by battle did not lie in such
+a case. When the trial was resumed on the following
+day, so much opposition arose between the king, who
+spoke strongly in Brembre's favour, and the lords,
+that it was decided to leave the question of the
+prisoner's guilt or innocence to a commission of lords,
+who, to the surprise and annoyance of the majority
+of the nobles, brought in a verdict of not guilty.
+Brembre was not to be allowed thus to escape. The
+lords sent for two representatives of the various crafts
+of the city to depose as to Brembre's guilt; but even<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page237">[pg 237]</span><a name="Pg237" id="Pg237" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+so, the lords failed to get any definite verdict. At
+last they sent for the mayor, recorder, and some of
+the aldermen (<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">seniores</span></span>) to learn what they had to say
+about the accused.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Conviction and sentence of death.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">One would have thought that with Nicholas
+Exton, his old friend and ally, to speak up for him,
+Brembre's life would now at least be saved, even if
+he were not altogether acquitted. It was not so,
+however. The mayor and aldermen were asked as
+to their <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">opinion</span></span> (not as to their knowledge), whether
+Brembre was cognisant of certain matters, and they
+gave it as their <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">opinion</span></span> that Brembre was more
+likely to have been cognisant of them than not.
+Turning then to the Recorder, the lords asked him
+how stood the law in such a case? To which he
+replied, that a man who knew such things as were
+laid to Brembre's charge, and knowing them failed to
+reveal them, deserved death. On such evidence as
+this, Brembre was convicted on the 20th February,
+and condemned to be executed.<a id="noteref_695" name="noteref_695" href="#note_695"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">695</span></span></a> He was drawn on a
+hurdle through the city to Tyburn, showing himself
+very penitent and earnestly desiring all persons to pray
+for him. At the last moment he confessed that his
+conduct towards Northampton had been vile and
+wicked. Whilst craving pardon of Northampton's
+son "he was suddenly turned off, and the executioner
+cutting his throat, he died."<a id="noteref_696" name="noteref_696" href="#note_696"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">696</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Character of Brembre as depicted by Walsingham.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">If we are to believe all that Walsingham records of
+Brembre, the character and conduct of the city alderman
+and ex-mayor was bad indeed. Besides conniving
+at the plot laid against Gloucester's life, which<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page238">[pg 238]</span><a name="Pg238" id="Pg238" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+involved the grossest breach of hospitality, he is
+recorded as having lain in wait with an armed force
+at the Mews near Charing Cross, to intercept and
+massacre the lords on their way to Westminster, to
+effect an arrangement with the king, as well as having
+entertained the idea of cutting the throats of a number
+of his fellow-citizens, and placing himself at the head
+of the government of the city, the name of which he
+proposed changing to that of "Little Troy."<a id="noteref_697" name="noteref_697" href="#note_697"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">697</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Deaths of Tressilian and Uske.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Of Brembre's associates, Tressilian was captured
+during the trial, torn from the Sanctuary at Westminster,
+and hanged on the 19th. Another to share
+the same fate was Thomas Uske, who had been one
+of the chief witnesses against Northampton. He was
+sentenced to death by parliament on the 4th March,
+and died asseverating to the last that he had done
+Northampton no injury, but that every word he had
+deposed against him the year before was absolutely
+true.<a id="noteref_698" name="noteref_698" href="#note_698"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">698</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The proceedings of the "merciless" parliament confirmed by oath.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The lords appellant, who were now complete
+masters of the situation, insisted upon the proceedings
+of this "merciless" parliament, as its opponents
+called it, being ratified by oath administered to
+prelates, knights, and nobles of the realm, as well as
+to the mayor, aldermen, and chief burgesses of every
+town. On the 4th June—the day parliament rose—a
+writ was issued in Richard's name, enjoining the
+administration of this oath to those aldermen and
+citizens of London who had not been present in
+parliament when the oath was administered there.<a id="noteref_699" name="noteref_699" href="#note_699"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">699</span></span></a></p>
+
+<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page239">[pg 239]</span><a name="Pg239" id="Pg239" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc141" id="toc141"></a>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Party spirit in the city, 1388-1389.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">In the meantime the continued jealousy existing
+among the city guilds—the Mercers, Goldsmiths,
+Drapers, and others, objecting to Fishmongers and
+Vintners taking any part in the government of the
+city on the ground that they were victuallers, and as
+such forbidden by an ordinance passed when
+Northampton was mayor to hold any municipal
+office<a id="noteref_700" name="noteref_700" href="#note_700"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">700</span></span></a>—had led parliament (14 May) to proclaim free
+trade throughout the kingdom.<a id="noteref_701" name="noteref_701" href="#note_701"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">701</span></span></a> A party in the city
+tried to get parliament to remove Exton from the
+mayoralty on the ground of his having connived at
+the curtailment of the City's liberties and franchises.
+The attempt, however, failed, and he remained in
+office until succeeded by Nicholas Twyford (Oct.,
+1388).<a id="noteref_702" name="noteref_702" href="#note_702"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">702</span></span></a> Although Twyford belonged to the party of
+Northampton as distinguished from that of Brembre
+and Exton, his election raised little or no opposition,
+such as had been anticipated. When he went out of
+office in October, 1389, however, party strife in the
+city again showed itself. The majority of the citizens
+voted William Venour, a grocer, into the
+mayoralty, but the choice was strongly opposed by
+the Goldsmiths, the Mercers, and the Drapers, who
+ran another candidate, one of their own body, Adam
+Bamme, a goldsmith.<a id="noteref_703" name="noteref_703" href="#note_703"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">703</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The return of Northampton to the city, 1390.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Some months before the close of Twyford's
+mayoralty, Richard had succeeded in gaining his
+independence (May, 1389), which he was induced by
+Lancaster, on his return after a prolonged absence
+abroad, to exercise at length in favour of Northampton,
+by permitting him once more to return to London,<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page240">[pg 240]</span><a name="Pg240" id="Pg240" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+although only as a stranger.<a id="noteref_704" name="noteref_704" href="#note_704"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">704</span></span></a> This was in July.
+In December, letters patent granting him a free
+pardon were issued, containing no such restriction.<a id="noteref_705" name="noteref_705" href="#note_705"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">705</span></span></a>
+His re-appearance in the streets of the city revived
+the old party spirit, and Adam Bamme, who had
+succeeded Venour in the mayoralty, found it expedient
+to forbid all discussion of the rights and the
+wrongs of the several parties of Northampton and
+Brembre on pain of imprisonment.<a id="noteref_706" name="noteref_706" href="#note_706"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">706</span></span></a> Four more
+years elapsed before Northampton was re-instated in
+the freedom of the city.<a id="noteref_707" name="noteref_707" href="#note_707"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">707</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Proclamation enforcing knighthood, Feb., 1392.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">For some years Richard governed not unwisely.
+In 1392, however, he quarrelled with the city. Early
+in that year he called upon every inhabitant, whose
+property for the last three years was worth £40 in
+land or rent, to take upon himself the honour of
+knighthood. The sheriffs, Henry Vanner and John
+Shadworth, made a return that all tenements and
+rents in the city were held of the king <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">in capite</span></span> as
+fee burgage at a fee farm (<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">ad feodi firmam</span></span>); that
+by reason of the value of tenements varying from
+time to time, and many of them requiring repair from
+damage by fire and tempest, their true annual value
+could not be ascertained, and that, therefore, it was
+impossible to make a return of those who possessed
+£40 of land or rent as desired.<a id="noteref_708" name="noteref_708" href="#note_708"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">708</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The mayor summoned to Nottingham, June, 1392.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">This answer was anything but agreeable to the
+king. But he had other cause just now for being<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page241">[pg 241]</span><a name="Pg241" id="Pg241" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc142" id="toc142"></a>
+offended with the city. Being in want of money, he
+had offered a valuable jewel to the citizens as security
+for a loan, and the citizens had excused themselves on
+the plea that they were not so well off as they used
+to be, since foreigners had been allowed to enjoy the
+same privileges in the city as themselves. Having
+failed in this quarter, the king had resorted to a
+Lombard, who soon was able to accommodate him;
+but when the king learnt on enquiry that the money so
+obtained had been advanced to the Lombard merchant
+by the very citizens who had refused to lend it
+to the king himself, his anger knew no bounds,<a id="noteref_709" name="noteref_709" href="#note_709"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">709</span></span></a> and
+he summoned John Hende, the mayor, the sheriffs, the
+aldermen, and twenty-four of the chief citizens<a id="noteref_710" name="noteref_710" href="#note_710"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">710</span></span></a> of the
+City to attend him in June, at Nottingham. They
+accordingly set out on their journey on the 19th June,
+and arrived in Nottingham on the 23rd; the government
+of the city being left in the meanwhile in the
+hands of William Staundon. On the 25th they appeared
+before the lords of the council, when the
+chancellor rated them roundly for paying so little
+attention to the king's writ—the writ touching knighthood—and
+complained of the defective manner in
+which the city was governed.<a id="noteref_711" name="noteref_711" href="#note_711"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">711</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The mayor and sheriffs committed to prison, June, 1392.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">He thereupon dismissed the mayor from office,
+committing him to Windsor Castle. The sheriffs were
+likewise dismissed, one being sent to Odyham Castle,<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page242">[pg 242]</span><a name="Pg242" id="Pg242" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+and the other to the Castle of Wallingford. The rest
+of the citizens were ordered to return home.<a id="noteref_712" name="noteref_712" href="#note_712"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">712</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Sir Edward Dalyngrigge appointed warden of the city, July, 1392.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">At nine o'clock in the morning of the 1st July,
+Sir Edward Dalyngrigge appeared in the Guildhall,
+and there, before an immense assembly of the commons,
+read the king's commissions appointing him
+warden of the city and the king's escheator. The
+deposed sheriffs were succeeded by Gilbert Maghfeld,
+or Maunfeld, and Thomas Newton, who remained in
+office, by the king's appointment,<a id="noteref_713" name="noteref_713" href="#note_713"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">713</span></span></a> until the end of
+the year, when they were re-elected, the one by the
+warden and the other by the citizens.<a id="noteref_714" name="noteref_714" href="#note_714"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">714</span></span></a> Dalyngrigge
+was soon afterwards succeeded in the office of warden
+by Sir Baldwin de Radyngton.<a id="noteref_715" name="noteref_715" href="#note_715"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">715</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The City fined £100,000, July, 1392.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">By way of inflicting further punishment upon the
+citizens, Richard had already removed the King's
+Bench and Exchequer from London to York;<a id="noteref_716" name="noteref_716" href="#note_716"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">716</span></span></a> but the
+removal proved so much more prejudicial to the
+nation at large than to the City of London that the
+courts were soon brought back.<a id="noteref_717" name="noteref_717" href="#note_717"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">717</span></span></a> He would even
+have waged open war on them had he dared.<a id="noteref_718" name="noteref_718" href="#note_718"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">718</span></span></a>
+Instead of proceeding to this extremity, he summoned
+the aldermen and 400 commoners to Windsor<a id="noteref_719" name="noteref_719" href="#note_719"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">719</span></span></a>
+and fined the City £100,000. This was in July (1392).<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page243">[pg 243]</span><a name="Pg243" id="Pg243" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc143" id="toc143"></a>
+In August the king notified his intention of passing
+through the city on his way from Shene to Westminster.
+The citizens embraced the opportunity of
+giving him a magnificent reception, which the king
+acknowledged in the following month by restoring to
+them their liberties and setting free their late mayor
+and sheriffs.<a id="noteref_720" name="noteref_720" href="#note_720"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">720</span></span></a> The fine of £100,000 recently imposed,
+as well as other moneys which the king considered to
+be due to him from the city, were also remitted.<a id="noteref_721" name="noteref_721" href="#note_721"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">721</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Municipal reforms, 1393.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Once more restored to their liberties, the citizens
+in the following year (1393), with the assent of parliament,
+effected a reform in the internal government
+of the city which the increasing population had
+rendered necessary. The Ward of Farringdon Within
+and Without had increased so much in wealth and
+population that it was deemed advisable to divide it
+into two parts, each part having its own alderman.
+Accordingly, in the following March (1394), Drew
+Barantyn was elected Alderman of Farringdon Within,
+whilst John Fraunceys was elected for Farringdon
+Without. A more important reform effected at the
+same time was the appointment of aldermen for life
+instead of for a year only.<a id="noteref_722" name="noteref_722" href="#note_722"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">722</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Change of conduct on the part of Richard, 1394-1398.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">In the following year (1394) the queen—Anne
+of Bohemia—died. She had always shown a friendly
+disposition towards the city, and it was mainly owing<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page244">[pg 244]</span><a name="Pg244" id="Pg244" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+to her intercession that Richard had restored its
+liberties.<a id="noteref_723" name="noteref_723" href="#note_723"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">723</span></span></a> Her death removed one good influence
+about Richard, and marks a change of policy or of
+character.<a id="noteref_724" name="noteref_724" href="#note_724"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">724</span></span></a> His second marriage in 1396 did not improve
+matters. In that year the mayor, Adam
+Bamme, died in office, and instead of allowing the
+citizens freely to elect a successor, he thrust upon
+them Richard Whitington.<a id="noteref_725" name="noteref_725" href="#note_725"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">725</span></span></a> He arrested the Duke of
+Gloucester and the Earls of Warwick and Arundel,
+and otherwise behaved so outrageously as to raise
+doubts as to his sanity. He gave out that he was
+afraid to appear in public for fear of the Londoners;
+but this was only a ruse for the purpose of raising
+money.<a id="noteref_726" name="noteref_726" href="#note_726"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">726</span></span></a> Like Edward II, he borrowed money from
+anybody and everybody, and often resorted to unconstitutional
+measures to fill his purse. He made the
+nobles and his wealthier subjects sign blank cheques
+for him to fill up at his pleasure.<a id="noteref_727" name="noteref_727" href="#note_727"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">727</span></span></a> These cheques, or
+"charters" as they were called, were afterwards
+burnt by order of his successor on the throne.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The landing of Henry of Lancaster, July, 1399.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">A crisis was fast approaching. The Duke of
+Hereford, whom the king had banished, and who, on
+the death of his father "time honoured Lancaster,"
+succeeded to the title early in 1399, was prevailed
+upon to return to England and strike a blow for the
+recovery of his inheritance which Richard had seized.
+Richard, as if infatuated, took this inopportune<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page245">[pg 245]</span><a name="Pg245" id="Pg245" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+moment to sail to Ireland. Before setting out he
+made a last bid for the favour of the citizens by
+again granting them permission to rule the fish trade
+according to ancient custom.<a id="noteref_728" name="noteref_728" href="#note_728"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">728</span></span></a> It was too late; they
+had already resolved to throw in their lot with
+Henry of Lancaster.</p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">As soon as Henry had landed at Ravenspur (4th
+July) a special messenger was despatched to the city
+with the news. The mayor was in bed, but he
+hurriedly rose and took steps to proclaim Henry's
+arrival in England. "Let us apparel ourselves and go
+and receive the Duke of Lancaster, since we agreed to
+send for him," was the resolution of those to whom
+the mayor conveyed the first tidings; and accordingly
+Drew Barentyn, who had succeeded Whitington in
+October, 1398, and 500 other citizens, took horse to
+meet the duke, whom they escorted to the city. The
+day that Henry entered the city was kept as a
+holiday, "as though it had been the day for the
+celebration of Easter."</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Richard's surrender and deposition from the crown.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">When Richard heard of Henry's landing he
+hurried back from Ireland. He was met by the duke
+with a large force, which comprised 1,200 Londoners,
+fully armed and horsed.<a id="noteref_729" name="noteref_729" href="#note_729"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">729</span></span></a> Finding resistance hopeless,
+the king made submission, craving only that he might
+be protected from the Londoners, who, he was convinced,
+bore him no good will. He was, in consequence,
+secretly conveyed to the Tower under cover<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page246">[pg 246]</span><a name="Pg246" id="Pg246" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+of night. Articles were drawn up accusing him of
+misgovernment, and publicly read in the Guildhall.
+Four of his advisers and supporters, whose names he
+gave up, hoping to gain favour for himself thereby,
+were executed at a fishmonger's stall in Cheapside.
+Sentence of deposition was passed against him, and
+Lancaster proclaimed king in his stead under the title
+of King Henry IV.</p>
+</div>
+</div>
+
+<hr class="doublepage" /><div class="tei tei-div" style="margin-bottom: 5.00em; margin-top: 5.00em">
+<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page247">[pg 247]</span><a name="Pg247" id="Pg247" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+<a name="toc144" id="toc144"></a>
+<a name="pdf145" id="pdf145"></a>
+<h1 class="tei tei-head" style="text-align: left; margin-bottom: 3.46em; margin-top: 3.46em"><span style="font-size: 173%">CHAPTER X.</span></h1>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-div" style="margin-bottom: 4.00em; margin-top: 4.00em">
+<a name="toc146" id="toc146"></a><h2 class="tei tei-head" style="text-align: left; margin-bottom: 2.88em; margin-top: 2.88em"></h2>
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Doubtful reports as to the late king's death.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The sentence passed on the late king proved his
+death warrant; his haughty spirit broke down, and
+he died at Pontefract the following year. According
+to Henry's account he died of wilful starvation.
+There were many, however, who believed him to
+have been put to death by Henry's orders; whilst
+others, on the contrary, refused to believe his death
+had actually taken place at all, notwithstanding the
+fact of the corpse having been purposely exposed to
+public view throughout its journey from Pontefract to
+London.<a id="noteref_730" name="noteref_730" href="#note_730"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">730</span></span></a> This belief that Richard was still alive was
+fostered by many, and, among others, by William
+Serle. He had been at one time the late king's
+chamberlain, and he kept up the delusion of Richard
+being still in the land of the living, by exhibiting
+the late king's signet, which had come into his possession.
+Serle was eventually arrested in the north
+of England and brought to London, to be executed
+at Tyburn.<a id="noteref_731" name="noteref_731" href="#note_731"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">731</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The "Trumpington" Conspiracy, 1416-1420.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Sixteen years later (1416), a certain Thomas
+Warde, called "Trumpyngtone," personated the late
+king, and a scheme was laid for placing him on the
+throne with the aid of Sigismund, king of the Romans<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page248">[pg 248]</span><a name="Pg248" id="Pg248" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+Sigismund, however, refused to have anything to do
+with the plot, which was hatched within the city's
+liberties by Benedict Wolman and Thomas Bekering.
+The conspiracy having been discovered, its authors
+were thrown into prison. One died before trial, the
+other paid the penalty for his rashness with his head.<a id="noteref_732" name="noteref_732" href="#note_732"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">732</span></span></a>
+In August, 1420, long after Trumpington was dead,
+two others, Thomas Cobold and William Bryan,
+endeavoured still to keep up the delusion in the city.
+The mayor, Whitington, himself ordered their arrest.
+Bryan had time to escape from the house of William
+Norton, a barber given to Lollardry, where he and
+his fellow conspirator were lodged. Cobold tried to
+hide himself, but was discovered cunningly concealed
+in the house, and taken before the mayor and aldermen.
+Being questioned as to the identity of Trumpington
+and the late king, he gave an evasive reply,
+adding, that the question of identity had become
+immaterial since Trumpington had been dead some
+time. Cobold was thought to be too dangerous a
+man to be allowed at large, so he was committed to
+prison.<a id="noteref_733" name="noteref_733" href="#note_733"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">733</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Proceedings against the Lollards.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">In the meantime Wycliffe had died (1384), and
+Lollardry had become only another name for general
+discontentment. The clergy made strenuous efforts to
+suppress the Lollards. Pope Boniface had invoked
+the assistance of the late king (1395) to destroy these<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page249">[pg 249]</span><a name="Pg249" id="Pg249" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc147" id="toc147"></a>
+"tares" (<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">lolium aridum</span></span>) that had sprung up amidst the
+wheat which remained constant to church and king,
+and called upon the mayor and commonalty of the
+city to use their interest with Richard to the same
+end.<a id="noteref_734" name="noteref_734" href="#note_734"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">734</span></span></a> Besides seeking the support of the commonalty
+against the powerful nobles, the new king sought the
+support of the church, and he had not been long on
+the throne before he issued commissions for search to
+be made in the city for Lollards, and for the arrest of
+all preachers found sowing the pestilential seed of
+Lollardry (<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">semen pestiferum lollardrie</span></span>).<a id="noteref_735" name="noteref_735" href="#note_735"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">735</span></span></a> Early in
+1401 a price was put upon the head of the captain
+and leader of the sect, Sir John Oldcastle, otherwise
+known as Lord Cobham. Public proclamation was
+made in the city, that any one giving information
+which should lead to his arrest should be rewarded
+with 500 marks; any one actually arresting or causing
+him to be arrested should receive double that amount,
+whilst the citizens and burgesses of any city or
+borough who should take and produce him before
+the king, should be for ever quit of all taxes, talliages,
+tenths, fifteenths and other assessments.<a id="noteref_736" name="noteref_736" href="#note_736"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">736</span></span></a> Not only
+were conventicles forbidden, but no one was allowed
+to visit the ordinary churches after nine o'clock at
+night or before five o'clock in the morning.<a id="noteref_737" name="noteref_737" href="#note_737"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">737</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The statute of heresy, 1401.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Still the clergy were not satisfied. The ecclesiastical
+courts could condemn men as heretics, but
+they had no power to burn them. Accordingly, a
+statute was passed this year (1401), known as the<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page250">[pg 250]</span><a name="Pg250" id="Pg250" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+statute of heresy (<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">de hæretico comburendo</span></span>), authorising
+the ecclesiastical courts to hand over to the civil
+powers any heretic refusing to recant, or relapsing
+after recantation, so that he might pay the penalty of
+being publicly burnt before the people.<a id="noteref_738" name="noteref_738" href="#note_738"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">738</span></span></a> It was the
+first English law passed for the suppression of religious
+opinion, and its first victim is said to have been one
+William Sautre, formerly a parish priest of Norfolk.<a id="noteref_739" name="noteref_739" href="#note_739"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">739</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Henry's other troubles.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Henry had other difficulties to face besides
+opposition from the nobles. France had refused to
+acknowledge his title to the crown, and demanded
+the restoration of Richard's widow, a mere child of
+eleven. The Scots<a id="noteref_740" name="noteref_740" href="#note_740"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">740</span></span></a> and the Welsh were on the point
+of engaging in open insurrection. Invasion was
+imminent; the exchequer was empty, and the
+Londoners appealed to could offer no more than a
+paltry loan of 4,000 marks.<a id="noteref_741" name="noteref_741" href="#note_741"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">741</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Supplies granted by parliament in 1404.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">As time went on, Henry had to try new methods
+for raising money. The parliament which met at the
+opening of 1404, granted the king a 1<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">s.</span></span> in the
+pound on all lands, tenements and rents, besides
+20<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">s.</span></span> for every knight's fee. The money so raised
+was not, however, to be at the disposal of the
+king's own ministers, but was to be placed in the
+hands of four officials to be known as treasurers of
+war (<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Guerrarum Thesaurarii</span></span>). The names of the<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page251">[pg 251]</span><a name="Pg251" id="Pg251" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+treasurers elected for the purpose are given as John
+Owdeby, clerk, John Hadley, Thomas Knolles, and
+Richard Merlawe, citizens of London.<a id="noteref_742" name="noteref_742" href="#note_742"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">742</span></span></a> Three of
+these were citizens of note. Hadley had already
+served as mayor in 1393, Knolles had filled the same
+office in 1399, and was re-elected in 1410, whilst
+Merlawe was destined to attain that honour both in
+1409 and 1417.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">More city loans in 1409 &amp; 1412.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">It was during Merlawe's first mayoralty that
+the citizens advanced to the king the sum of 7,000
+marks,<a id="noteref_743" name="noteref_743" href="#note_743"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">743</span></span></a> to enable him to complete the reduction of
+Wales, which his son, the Prince of Wales, had
+already nearly accomplished. In 1412 they advanced
+a further sum of 10,000 marks.<a id="noteref_744" name="noteref_744" href="#note_744"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">744</span></span></a> At the beginning of
+that year a commission was addressed by Henry to
+Robert Chichele, the mayor, brother of the archbishop
+of the same name, to the sheriffs of the city, to
+Richard Whitington and Thomas Knolles, the late
+mayor, instructing them to make a return of the
+amount of land and tenements held in the city and
+suburbs, with the view of levying 6<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">s.</span></span> 8<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">d.</span></span> on every
+£20 annual rent by virtue of an act passed by the
+late parliament.<a id="noteref_745" name="noteref_745" href="#note_745"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">745</span></span></a> A return was made to the effect
+that it was very difficult to discover the true value of
+lands and tenements in the city and suburbs, owing to
+absence of tenants and dilapidations by fire and
+water, but that they had caused enquiry to be made,
+and the names of men, women and other persons
+(<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">hominum, feminarum et aliarum personarum</span></span>) mentioned
+in the commission were forwarded by them in<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page252">[pg 252]</span><a name="Pg252" id="Pg252" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+the following a, b, c (<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">in sequenti a, b, c</span></span>). What lands
+and tenements the "men, women and other persons"
+had elsewhere they had no means of discovering.<a id="noteref_746" name="noteref_746" href="#note_746"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">746</span></span></a>
+The schedule, or "a, b, c," is not entered in the City
+Letter Book, but is to be found among the Exchequer
+Rolls, preserved at Her Majesty's Public Record<a id="noteref_747" name="noteref_747" href="#note_747"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">747</span></span></a>
+Office. The gross rental was returned at £4,220, and
+the sum paid into the exchequer at 6<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">s.</span></span> 8<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">d.</span></span> for every
+£20, under the provisions of the act amounted to
+£70 6<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">s.</span></span> 8<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">d.</span></span> The mayor and commonalty of the city
+are credited as possessing lands, tenements and rents
+of an annual value of no more than £150 9<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">s.</span></span> 11<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">d.</span></span>,
+whilst the Bridge House Estate was returned at
+£148 15<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">s.</span></span> 3<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">d.</span></span> Of the livery companies, the Goldsmiths
+appear as the owners of the largest property,
+their rental of city property amounting to
+£46 10<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">s.</span></span> 1/2<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">d.</span></span>, the Merchant Tailors following them
+closely with £44 3<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">s.</span></span> 7<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">d.</span></span> The Mercers had but a
+rental of £13 18<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">s.</span></span> 4<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">d.</span></span> whilst the Skinners had
+£18 12<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">s.</span></span> 8<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">d.</span></span> Robert Chichele, the mayor, was
+already a rich man, with an annual rental of
+£42 19<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">s.</span></span> 2<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">d.</span></span>, derived from city property, or nearly
+double the amount (£25) with which Richard
+Whitington was credited.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Whitington mayor for the third time, 1406.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Whitington had already three times occupied the
+mayoralty chair; once (in 1396) at the word of a
+king, and twice (in 1397 and 1406) at the will of his
+fellow citizens. On the occasion of his third election
+a solemn mass was for the first time introduced into
+the proceedings, the mayor, aldermen and a large<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page253">[pg 253]</span><a name="Pg253" id="Pg253" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc148" id="toc148"></a>
+body of commoners attending the service at the
+Guildhall Chapel, before proceeding to the election.<a id="noteref_748" name="noteref_748" href="#note_748"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">748</span></span></a>
+The custom which then sprang up continues in a
+modified form to this day, the election of a
+mayor being always preceded by divine service. Its
+origin may perhaps be ascribed in some measure to
+the spirit of Lollardry which, in its best sense, found
+much favour with the citizens.</p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The enormous wealth which he succeeded in amassing
+was bestowed in promoting the cause of education,
+and in relieving the sufferings of the poor and
+afflicted. He built a handsome library in the house of
+the Grey Friars and also the Church of Saint Michael
+in the "Riole." He is credited by some writers with
+having purchased and presented to the corporation
+the advowson of the Church of St. Peter upon
+Cornhill. But this is probably a mistake arising from
+the fact of a license in mortmain having been granted
+by Henry IV to Richard Whitington, John Hende,
+and others, to convey the manor of Leadenhall,
+together with the advowsons of the several churches
+of Saint Peter upon Cornhill and Saint Margaret
+Patyns, held of the king in free burgage, to the mayor
+and commonalty of the City of London and their
+successors.<a id="noteref_749" name="noteref_749" href="#note_749"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">749</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Further proceedings against Oldcastle and the Lollards, 1413.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">On the accession of Henry V, Archbishop Arundel,
+whom Walsingham describes as the most eminent<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page254">[pg 254]</span><a name="Pg254" id="Pg254" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+bulwark and indomitable supporter of the church,<a id="noteref_750" name="noteref_750" href="#note_750"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">750</span></span></a>
+renewed his attack on the Lollards, and endeavoured
+to serve Oldcastle with a citation. Failing to accomplish
+this he caused him to be arrested. The bold
+defence made by the so-called heretic, when before his
+judges, gained additional weight from the reputation
+he enjoyed for high moral character. Nevertheless
+he was adjudged guilty of the charges brought against
+him. A formal sentence of excommunication was
+passed, and he was remitted to the Tower for forty
+days in the hope that at the expiration of that time
+he might be found willing to retract. This, however,
+was not to be.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Meeting of Lollards in St. Giles' Fields, 12 Jan., 1414.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">He contrived to make his escape from prison,<a id="noteref_751" name="noteref_751" href="#note_751"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">751</span></span></a>
+and shortly afterwards appeared at the head of a
+number of followers in St. Giles's Fields. Great disappointment
+was felt at not receiving the assistance
+that had been expected from city servants and
+apprentices. According to Walsingham, no less than
+5,000 men, comprising masters as well as servants,
+from the city, were prepared to join the insurgents,
+had not the king taken precautions to secure the
+gates. As soon as it was discovered that the
+young king had made ample preparations to meet
+attack, the Lollards took to flight. Many, however,
+failed to make good their escape, and nearly forty
+paid the penalty of their rashness with their lives.<a id="noteref_752" name="noteref_752" href="#note_752"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">752</span></span></a><span class="tei tei-pb" id="page255">[pg 255]</span><a name="Pg255" id="Pg255" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+Walsingham was probably misinformed as to the
+number of the persons who were prepared to assist
+the Lollards. The fact is that, to the respectable
+City burgess, Lollardism was a matter of less moment
+than was the scandalous life led by the chantry priest
+and other ministers of religion, and this the civic
+authorities were determined to rectify as far as in
+them lay. Between the years 1400 and 1440, some
+sixty clerks in holy orders were taken in adultery
+and clapt into prison by ward beadles.<a id="noteref_753" name="noteref_753" href="#note_753"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">753</span></span></a> Nevertheless
+the clergy, and more especially the chantry priest,
+continued to live a life of luxury and sloth, oftentimes
+spending the day in dicing, card playing, cock fighting
+and frequenting taverns.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The last Statute against the Lollards, 1414.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The recent abortive attempt of Oldcastle gave
+rise to another Statute against the Lollards,<a id="noteref_754" name="noteref_754" href="#note_754"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">754</span></span></a> by which
+the secular power, no longer content with merely
+carrying into execution the sentences pronounced by
+ecclesiastical courts, undertook, where necessary, the
+initiative against heretics. Archbishop Arundel, the
+determined enemy of the Lollards, had had no hand
+in framing this Statute—the last that was enacted
+against them.<a id="noteref_755" name="noteref_755" href="#note_755"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">755</span></span></a> He had died a few months before
+parliament met, and had been succeeded by Henry
+Chichele.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The king's offer of pardon refused by Oldcastle, 1415.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Early in the following year (1415) the king made
+an offer of pardon to Oldcastle, who was still at large,
+if he would come in and make submission before<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page256">[pg 256]</span><a name="Pg256" id="Pg256" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+Easter.<a id="noteref_756" name="noteref_756" href="#note_756"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">756</span></span></a> Instead of accepting so generous an offer,
+Oldcastle busied himself in preparing for another rising
+to take place as soon as the king should have set sail
+on his meditated expedition to France. Lollard manifestoes
+again appeared on the doors of the London
+churches; whilst Oldcastle himself scoured the country
+for recruits, to serve under a banner on which the
+most sacred emblems of the church were depicted.<a id="noteref_757" name="noteref_757" href="#note_757"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">757</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Trial and execution of Cleydon, a Lollard, 1415.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">In August (1415) another Lollard, John Cleydone
+by name, a currier by trade, was tried in St.
+Paul's Church before the new Archbishop and others,
+the civic authorities having taken the initiative
+according to the provisions of the recent Statute,
+and arrested him on suspicion of being a heretic.
+The mayor himself was a witness at the trial, and
+testified as to the nature of certain books found in
+Cleydon's possession; they were "the worst and the
+most perverse that ever he did read or see." Walsingham,
+who styles Cleydon "an inveterate Lollard"
+(<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">quidam inveteratus Lollardus</span></span>), adds, with his usual
+acerbity against the entire sect, that the accused
+had gone so far as to make his own son a priest, and
+have Mass celebrated by him in his own house on
+the occasion when his wife should have gone to
+church, after rising from childbed.<a id="noteref_758" name="noteref_758" href="#note_758"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">758</span></span></a> Having been
+convicted of heresy by the ecclesiastical court, the
+prisoner was again delivered over to the secular
+authorities for punishment.<a id="noteref_759" name="noteref_759" href="#note_759"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">759</span></span></a> Both he and his books
+were burnt.<a id="noteref_760" name="noteref_760" href="#note_760"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">760</span></span></a></p>
+
+<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page257">[pg 257]</span><a name="Pg257" id="Pg257" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc149" id="toc149"></a>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Oldcastle taken and executed, 1417.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Two years later Oldcastle himself was captured in
+Wales and brought to London. At his trial he publicly
+declared his belief that Richard II was still alive;
+he was even fanatic enough to believe that he himself
+would soon rise again from the dead.<a id="noteref_761" name="noteref_761" href="#note_761"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">761</span></span></a> He was sentenced
+to be hanged and burnt on the gallows, a
+sentence which was carried out in St. Giles's Fields.<a id="noteref_762" name="noteref_762" href="#note_762"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">762</span></span></a>
+Lollardry continued to exist, especially in London and
+the towns, for some years, but it ceased to have any
+historical or political significance.<a id="noteref_763" name="noteref_763" href="#note_763"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">763</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Preparations for the invasion of France, 1414-1415.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Henry V was resolved to maintain not only the
+old religion of the days of Edward III, but also the
+old foreign policy, and in 1414 he commenced making
+preparations for renewing the claim of his great-grandfather
+to the crown of France. In 1415 this claim
+was formally made, and Henry gathered his forces
+together at Southampton. On the 10th March he
+informed the civic authorities of his intention of crossing
+over to France to enforce his claim and of his
+need of money. On the 14th a brilliant assembly,
+comprising the king's two brothers, John, Duke of
+Bedford, and Humphrey, Duke of Gloucester, Edward,
+Duke of York, the Archbishop of Canterbury, the
+Bishop of Winchester, and others, met at the Guildhall
+to consider the matter.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">A question of precedence in the city.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">A question arose as to order of precedence, and it
+was arranged that the mayor, as the king's representative
+in the City, should occupy the centre seat, having
+the Primate and the Bishop of Winchester on his<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page258">[pg 258]</span><a name="Pg258" id="Pg258" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+right, and the Duke of York and the king's brothers
+on his left.<a id="noteref_764" name="noteref_764" href="#note_764"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">764</span></span></a> This question having been settled, the
+meeting, we presume, got to business; but what took
+place is not recorded in the City's archives. We
+know, however, that in June the king pledged his
+jewels to the City for a loan of 10,000 marks,<a id="noteref_765" name="noteref_765" href="#note_765"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">765</span></span></a> and
+that on the 1st August—just as he was preparing to
+set sail—he raised a further loan of 10,000 marks on
+the security of the customs.<a id="noteref_766" name="noteref_766" href="#note_766"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">766</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The king takes leave of the citizens on Blackheath, June, 1415.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">On the 15th June the king, who was then on his
+way to the coast, took solemn leave of the civic
+authorities, who had accompanied him to Blackheath.
+He bade them go home and keep well his "chamber"
+during his absence abroad, giving them his blessing
+and saying "Cryste save London."<a id="noteref_767" name="noteref_767" href="#note_767"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">767</span></span></a> Arriving at
+Southampton, he there discovered a conspiracy to
+place the young Earl of March, the legitimate heir of
+Edward III, on the throne, as soon as he himself
+should have set sail. The traitors were seized and
+executed, and the City lost no time in sending the king
+a letter congratulating him upon his discovery of
+the plot.<a id="noteref_768" name="noteref_768" href="#note_768"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">768</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The capture of Harfleur, 18 Sept., 1415.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">A few days later (12th August) he sailed for
+France and landed near Harfleur, to which town he<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page259">[pg 259]</span><a name="Pg259" id="Pg259" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc150" id="toc150"></a>
+laid siege. It offered, however, a stubborn defence,
+and it was not until the 18th September that the
+town surrendered. On the 22nd Henry sent a long
+account of the siege and capture to the mayor and
+citizens of London, bidding them render humble
+thanks to Almighty God for this mercy, and expressing
+a hope of further success in the near future.<a id="noteref_769" name="noteref_769" href="#note_769"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">769</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Volunteers for service in France required, Oct., 1415.</span></div></div>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Citizens invited to reside in Harfleur.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Early in October the king caused proclamation
+to be made in the City, that all and singular knights,
+esquires and valets who were willing to go with him
+to Normandy, should present themselves to his uncle
+Henry, Bishop of Winchester and Treasurer of
+England, who would pay them their wages. By the
+same proclamation merchants, victuallers and handicraft-men
+were invited to take up their residence in
+the recently captured town of Harfleur, where houses
+would be assigned to them, and where they should
+enjoy the same privileges and franchises to which they
+had always been accustomed.<a id="noteref_770" name="noteref_770" href="#note_770"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">770</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Joy in the city at the news of the battle of Agincourt, Oct., 1415.</span></div></div>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The citizens welcome the king on his return from France.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The battle of Agincourt was fought on the 25th
+October, and news of the joyous victory arrived in
+England on or before the 28th, on which day—the
+Feast of St. Simon and St. Jude—Nicholas Wotton,
+the recently elected mayor, was sworn into office at
+the Guildhall according to custom. On the following
+day, therefore, the mayor, aldermen and a large
+number of the commonalty made a solemn pilgrimage
+on foot to Westminster, where they first made devout
+thanksgiving for the victory that had been won, and
+then proceeded to present the new mayor before the
+Barons of the Exchequer. Care is taken in the City<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page260">[pg 260]</span><a name="Pg260" id="Pg260" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+records to explain that the procession went on this
+occasion on foot, simply and solely for the purpose of
+marking their humble thanks to the Almighty and his
+Saints, and more especially to Edward the Confessor,
+who lay interred at Westminster, for the joyful news
+which so unexpectedly had arrived. The journey on
+foot was not to be drawn into precedent when others
+succeeded to the mayoralty, nor supplant the riding
+in state which had been customary on such occasions.<a id="noteref_771" name="noteref_771" href="#note_771"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">771</span></span></a>
+The reception given to the king by the Londoners on
+his return from France, was of so brilliant and varied
+a character, that one chronicler declares that a description
+of it would require a special treatise.<a id="noteref_772" name="noteref_772" href="#note_772"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">772</span></span></a> On the
+16th November he landed at Dover and proceeded
+towards London. On Saturday, the 23rd, the mayor
+and aldermen and all the companies rode forth in
+their liveries to meet the king and conduct him and
+his train of French prisoners through the City to
+Westminster. On Sunday morning a deputation from
+the City waited upon Henry and presented him with
+the sum of £1,000 and two basons of gold worth half
+that sum.<a id="noteref_773" name="noteref_773" href="#note_773"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">773</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Preparations for another expedition, 1416-1417.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">During the next eighteen months succeeding the
+battle of Agincourt, Henry devoted himself to
+making preparations at home for renewing active
+military operations. He had intended at midsummer,
+1416, to lead an expedition in person to the relief
+of Harfleur, but the command was subsequently<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page261">[pg 261]</span><a name="Pg261" id="Pg261" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc151" id="toc151"></a>
+delegated to his brother, the Duke of Bedford. Proclamation
+was publicly made in the city by order of the
+king, dated the 28th May, that all and singular
+knights, esquires and valets holding any fief or
+annuity from the king should proceed to Southampton
+by the 20th June, armed each according to his estate,
+for the purpose of joining the expedition.<a id="noteref_774" name="noteref_774" href="#note_774"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">774</span></span></a> In 1417
+France was rendered weak by factions, and Henry
+seized the opportunity for another attack. On the 1st
+February he issued his writ to the sheriffs of London
+for a return to be made of the number of men-at-arms
+and archers the City knights could furnish.<a id="noteref_775" name="noteref_775" href="#note_775"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">775</span></span></a> In
+March the mayor, Henry Barton, was made a commissioner
+for victualling the navy which was to
+rendezvous at Southampton.<a id="noteref_776" name="noteref_776" href="#note_776"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">776</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">City loans, 1417.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">In the same month the City advanced the king
+the sum of 5,000 marks,<a id="noteref_777" name="noteref_777" href="#note_777"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">777</span></span></a> and in the following June a
+further sum was advanced by private subscription
+among the wealthier citizens on the security of a
+Spanish sword, set in gold and precious stones, of the
+estimated value of £2,000. The sword was pledged
+with the subscribers on the understanding that they
+would not dispose of it before Michaelmas twelve-month.<a id="noteref_778" name="noteref_778" href="#note_778"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">778</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Letter from the king to the City announcing his success, 9 Aug., 1417.</span></div></div>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Another letter informing them of the capture of Caen, 5 Sept.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">On the 9th August the king addressed a letter to
+the mayor, sheriffs, aldermen and good folk of the
+City of London, informing them of his safe arrival in<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page262">[pg 262]</span><a name="Pg262" id="Pg262" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+Normandy and of his success in making himself
+master of the castle of "Touque" without bloodshed.<a id="noteref_779" name="noteref_779" href="#note_779"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">779</span></span></a>
+To this the citizens sent a dutiful reply on the
+28th day of the same month, assuring the king of the
+peaceful condition of the city. On the 2nd September
+an order went forth from the Common Council of
+the City that each alderman should immediately
+instruct the constables of his ward to go their rounds
+and warn all soldiers they might come across, to
+vacate the City and set out on the king's service
+before the end of the week on pain of imprisonment.<a id="noteref_780" name="noteref_780" href="#note_780"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">780</span></span></a>
+Success continued to attend Henry's arms. On the
+5th September he was able to inform the citizens, by
+letter,<a id="noteref_781" name="noteref_781" href="#note_781"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">781</span></span></a> of the capture of Caen, excepting only the
+citadel, and this was to be rendered to him by
+the 19th day of the same month at the latest, unless
+relief should have previously arrived for the besieged
+from the King of France, his son the Dauphin, or the
+Count of Armagnac, Constable of France. The Duke
+of Clarence wrote a few days later to the citizens,
+notifying the extraordinary success which had followed
+the king. So many towns and fortresses had been
+taken that the only fear was that there were not
+sufficient men to keep guard over them.<a id="noteref_782" name="noteref_782" href="#note_782"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">782</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Proclamation by the Duke of Bedford, 18 Oct.</span></div></div>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Supplies granted by parliament, Dec, 1417.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">In order to keep the English force in Normandy
+better provided with victuals, the Duke of Bedford,
+who had been left behind as the king's lieutenant,
+caused the Sheriffs of London to proclaim that all
+persons willing and able to ship victuals to France for<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page263">[pg 263]</span><a name="Pg263" id="Pg263" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc152" id="toc152"></a>
+Henry's use, might do so without paying custom dues
+on their giving security that the victuals should be
+sent to Caen and not elsewhere.<a id="noteref_783" name="noteref_783" href="#note_783"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">783</span></span></a> Bedford, who was
+learning how to rule a free people—a lesson which,
+had he been allowed to practice in after years, might
+have saved the house of Lancaster from utter destruction<a id="noteref_784" name="noteref_784" href="#note_784"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">784</span></span></a>—presided
+in the parliament, which met in
+November, 1417. On the 17th December this parliament
+granted the king two fifteenths and two tenths.
+No time was lost in taking measures for collecting
+these supplies, the king's writ appointing commissioners
+for the City of London being issued the day
+following.<a id="noteref_785" name="noteref_785" href="#note_785"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">785</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Henry's conquest of Normandy, 1417-1419.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">In Paris matters were going on from bad to
+worse. Whilst the capital of France was at the
+mercy of a mob, Henry proceeded to lay close siege
+to Rouen. Frequent proclamation was made in
+London for reinforcements to join the king, either at
+Rouen or elsewhere in Normandy.<a id="noteref_786" name="noteref_786" href="#note_786"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">786</span></span></a> This was in
+April, 1418, or thereabouts. On the 5th July, the
+Duke of Clarence informed Richard Merlawe, the
+mayor, by letter, of the fall of Louviers, and of the
+expected surrender of Pont de l'Arche,<a id="noteref_787" name="noteref_787" href="#note_787"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">787</span></span></a> from which
+latter place the duke wrote. On the 10th August
+Henry himself wrote to the citizens informing them
+of his having sat down before Rouen and of the<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page264">[pg 264]</span><a name="Pg264" id="Pg264" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+straits his forces were in for lack of victuals and
+more especially of "drink." He begged them to
+send as many small vessels as they could, laden
+with provisions, to Harfleur, whence they could
+make their way up the Seine to Rouen.<a id="noteref_788" name="noteref_788" href="#note_788"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">788</span></span></a> In less
+than a month a reply was sent (8 Sept.) from
+Gravesend under the seal of the mayoralty, informing
+Henry that the citizens had been busy brewing ale
+and beer and purveying wine and other "vitaille," and
+that they had despatched thirty butts of sweet wine—comprising
+ten of "Tyre," ten of "Romesey," and ten
+of "Malvesy"—and 1,000 pipes of ale and beer.
+With these they had also sent 25,000 cups for the
+king's "host" to drink out of.<a id="noteref_789" name="noteref_789" href="#note_789"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">789</span></span></a> In the meantime, the
+besieged received no such relief from the pains of
+hunger and thirst, and on the 19th January, 1419,
+they were compelled to surrender their ancient town.<a id="noteref_790" name="noteref_790" href="#note_790"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">790</span></span></a>
+The war continued throughout the year (1419),
+all attempts at a reconciliation proving abortive.
+Pointoise fell into Henry's hands; and both Henry
+and the Duke of Clarence sent word of its capture to
+London. The duke took the opportunity of asking
+that the freedom of the City might be conferred on
+his servant, Roger Tillyngton, a skinner; but the
+citizens in acknowledging the duke's letter make no
+reference to his request.<a id="noteref_791" name="noteref_791" href="#note_791"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">791</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The king's letter to the City, 17 Aug., 1419.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">On the 17th August the king wrote again to the
+mayor, aldermen and commons of the City, thanking<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page265">[pg 265]</span><a name="Pg265" id="Pg265" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc153" id="toc153"></a>
+them for their "kynde and notable prone of an ayde,"
+which they had granted of their own free will, therein
+setting a good example to others, and prayed them to
+follow such directions as the Duke of Bedford should
+give them respecting their proffered assistance. The
+bearer of this letter having been taken prisoner at
+Crotoye, a duplicate copy of it was afterwards forwarded
+from Trie le Chastel on the 12th September.<a id="noteref_792" name="noteref_792" href="#note_792"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">792</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The treaty of Troyes, 20 May. 1420.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The murder of John, Duke of Burgundy, by a
+partisan of the Dauphin, which took place about this
+time, induced Duke Philip to come to terms with
+England in the hope of avenging his father's death;<a id="noteref_793" name="noteref_793" href="#note_793"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">793</span></span></a>
+and the French king, finding further resistance hopeless,
+was content to make peace. By the treaty of
+Troyes (20 May, 1420), the Dauphin was disinherited
+in favour of Henry, who was formally recognised
+as the heir to the French crown, and who agreed
+to marry Catherine, daughter of Charles VI.<a id="noteref_794" name="noteref_794" href="#note_794"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">794</span></span></a> The
+marriage took place on the 3rd June, and on the
+14th a solemn procession was made in London and
+a sermon preached at Paul's Cross in honour of the
+event.<a id="noteref_795" name="noteref_795" href="#note_795"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">795</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The king's letter to the City, 12 July, 1420.</span></div></div>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The mayor's reply, 2 Aug.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">On the 12th July Henry addressed a letter from
+Mant to the corporation of London informing them
+of his welfare. He had left Paris for Mant in order
+to relieve the town of Chartres, which was being
+threatened by the Dauphin. The Duke of Burgundy
+had joined him and had proved himself "a trusty,
+lovvng and faithful brother." The king's expedition
+proved unnecessary, for the Dauphin had raised the
+siege before his arrival and had gone into Touraine.<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page266">[pg 266]</span><a name="Pg266" id="Pg266" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+To this letter a reply was sent under the mayoralty
+seal on the 2nd August, congratulating Henry upon
+his success, and assuring him that there was no city
+on earth more peaceful or better governed than his
+City of London.<a id="noteref_796" name="noteref_796" href="#note_796"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">796</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The queen's coronation.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">On the 26th January, 1421, the Duke of Gloucester,
+the Guardian of England in the king's absence,
+ordered the Sheriffs of London to announce that the
+queen's coronation would take place at Westminster
+on the third Sunday in Lent.<a id="noteref_797" name="noteref_797" href="#note_797"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">797</span></span></a> The king and queen
+landed at Dover with a small retinue on the 1st February,
+and after a few days' rest at Canterbury,
+entered the city of London amid tokens of welcome
+and respect from the laity and clergy. They took up
+their abode at the Tower, whence they were conducted
+on the day appointed for the coronation to
+Westminster by the citizens on foot and on horseback.<a id="noteref_798" name="noteref_798" href="#note_798"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">798</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Henry's last expedition, and death, Aug., 1422.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Henry had not been at home six months before
+he again left England, never to return.<a id="noteref_799" name="noteref_799" href="#note_799"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">799</span></span></a> The hopes
+that he entertained of reforming and governing his
+possessions in France, and his ambition to have
+headed, sooner or later, a crusade which should have
+stayed the progress of the Ottoman and have recovered
+the sepulchre of Christ, were not destined to
+be realised. He died at the Bois de Vincennes, near
+Paris, on the last day of August, 1422, leaving a child<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page267">[pg 267]</span><a name="Pg267" id="Pg267" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc154" id="toc154"></a>
+nine months old—the unhappy Henry of Windsor
+who succeeded to the throne as Henry VI. When
+the body of the late king was brought over from
+France to be buried at Westminster, the citizens
+showed it every token of respect in its passage through
+London. The streets of the city, as well as of the
+borough of Southwark, were cleaned for the occasion.
+The mayor, sheriffs, recorder and aldermen, accompanied
+by the chief burgesses, and clad in white gowns
+and hoods, went forth to meet the remains of the
+king they loved so well, as far as St. George's bar
+in Southwark, and reverently conducted them to St.
+Paul's Church, where the funeral obsequies were performed.
+The next day they accompanied the corpse
+to Westminster, where further ceremonies took place.
+Representatives of the various wards were told off to
+line the streets, the solemnity of the occasion being
+marked by the burning of torches, whilst chaplains
+stood in the porches of the various churches, clad in
+their richest copes, with thuribles in their hands, and
+chanted the <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">venite</span></span> and incensed the royal remains as
+they passed. The livery companies provided amongst
+them 211 torches, and to each torch-bearer the city
+chamberlain gave a gown and hood of white material
+or "blanket" (<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">de blanqueto</span></span>), at the "cost of the
+commonalty." <a id="noteref_800" name="noteref_800" href="#note_800"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">800</span></span></a></p>
+</div>
+</div>
+
+<hr class="doublepage" /><div class="tei tei-div" style="margin-bottom: 5.00em; margin-top: 5.00em">
+<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page268">[pg 268]</span><a name="Pg268" id="Pg268" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+<a name="toc155" id="toc155"></a>
+<a name="pdf156" id="pdf156"></a>
+<h1 class="tei tei-head" style="text-align: left; margin-bottom: 3.46em; margin-top: 3.46em"><span style="font-size: 173%">CHAPTER XI.</span></h1>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-div" style="margin-bottom: 4.00em; margin-top: 4.00em">
+<h2 class="tei tei-head" style="text-align: left; margin-bottom: 2.88em; margin-top: 2.88em"></h2>
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Rivalry between Bedford and Gloucester, 1422.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">At the death of Henry V the administration of
+affairs fell into the hands of his two brothers, John,
+Duke of Bedford, and Humfrey, Duke of Gloucester.
+On the 29th September a writ was issued from
+Windsor, in the name of the infant on whom the
+crown of England had devolved, summoning four
+citizens of London to attend a parliament to be held
+at Westminster at Martinmas,<a id="noteref_801" name="noteref_801" href="#note_801"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">801</span></span></a> and two days afterwards
+another was addressed to the sheriffs of London,
+enjoining them to make proclamation for the keeping
+the king's peace, and authorising them to arrest and
+imprison rioters until the king and his council should
+determine upon their punishment.<a id="noteref_802" name="noteref_802" href="#note_802"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">802</span></span></a> The precise wishes
+of the late king as to the respective parts which Bedford
+and Gloucester were to undertake in the government
+of the realm are not clearly known, but it is
+generally thought that he intended the former to
+govern France, whilst the latter was to act as his
+vicegerent in England. An attempt to carry out the
+arrangement was doomed to failure.</p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">As soon as parliament met (9 Nov.) it took
+into consideration the respective claims of the two
+dukes. Bedford had already (26 Oct.) despatched
+a letter from Rouen, addressed to the civic authorities,<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page269">[pg 269]</span><a name="Pg269" id="Pg269" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc157" id="toc157"></a>
+setting forth his right to the government of the
+realm, as elder brother of the deceased sovereign
+and as the party most interested in the succession
+to the crown. Without mentioning Gloucester by
+name, he warned the citizens against executing orders
+derogatory to himself. He professed to do this, not
+from any ambitious designs of his own, but from a
+wish to preserve intact the laws, usage and customs
+of the realm.<a id="noteref_803" name="noteref_803" href="#note_803"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">803</span></span></a> After some hesitation, parliament
+resolved to appoint Bedford protector as soon as he
+should return from France, but that during his absence
+Gloucester should act for him.<a id="noteref_804" name="noteref_804" href="#note_804"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">804</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">An expedition to start for France, 1 March, 1423.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">On the 8th February of the new year (1423),
+the sheriffs of London received orders to make proclamation
+for all soldiers who were in the king's pay
+to assemble at Winchelsea by the 1st day of March,
+as an expedition was to set sail from that port for
+the purpose of defending the town and castle of
+Crotoye. The business was pressing and necessitated a
+repetition of the order to the sheriffs a fortnight later
+(22 Feb.).<a id="noteref_805" name="noteref_805" href="#note_805"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">805</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Sir John Mortimer.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">On the 23rd February William Crowmere, the
+mayor, William Sevenoke, William Waldene, and
+John Fray were appointed commissioners to enquire
+into cases of treason and felony within the city; and
+two days later they found Sir John Mortimer, who
+was charged with a treasonable design in favour of
+the Earl of March, guilty of having broken prison.<a id="noteref_806" name="noteref_806" href="#note_806"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">806</span></span></a>
+He was subsequently convicted of treason both by
+lords and commons, and sentenced to death.</p>
+
+<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page270">[pg 270]</span><a name="Pg270" id="Pg270" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The debts of Henry IV.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">On the 5th June (1423) the hearts of the citizens
+were gladdened with the news that they were likely
+to be repaid some of the money they had advanced
+to the king's grandfather. Orders were given for all
+persons to whom Henry IV was indebted at the time
+of his decease, and who had not yet received from
+his executors a moiety of the sums due, to send in
+their bills and tallies to Sir John Pelham and John
+Leventhorp, two of the king's executors, sitting at
+the Priory of Saint Mary, Southwark, by the Monday
+next after Midsummer-day.<a id="noteref_807" name="noteref_807" href="#note_807"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">807</span></span></a> We can believe that
+few orders ever met with readier response from the
+inhabitants of the city.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Gloucester and Beaufort, 1425-1428.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">At home as well as abroad Gloucester soon made
+enemies; among them was his own uncle, the Chancellor,
+Henry Beaufort, Bishop of Winchester, a
+wealthy and ambitious prelate. During Gloucester's
+absence on the continent, whither he had gone to
+recover the estates of his newly-married wife, the
+ill-fated Jacqueline of Hainault, Beaufort garrisoned
+the Tower with creatures of his own. When Gloucester
+returned mutual recriminations took place, and
+the mayor was ordered (29 Oct., 1425) to prevent
+Beaufort entering the city. A riot ensued in which
+the citizens took the part of the duke, and the bishop
+had to take refuge in Southwark. The quarrel was
+patched up for awhile until Bedford, who was sent
+for, should arrive to act as arbitrator.<a id="noteref_808" name="noteref_808" href="#note_808"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">808</span></span></a> He arrived in
+London on the 10th January, 1426. The citizens,
+who had more than once been in communication with<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page271">[pg 271]</span><a name="Pg271" id="Pg271" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+the duke<a id="noteref_809" name="noteref_809" href="#note_809"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">809</span></span></a> during his absence abroad, presented him
+with a pair of basins, silver-gilt, containing 1,000
+marks. The gift, however, does not appear to have
+been so graciously received as it might have been,
+for a London alderman records that the donors, for
+all their liberality, "hadde but lytylle thanke."<a id="noteref_810" name="noteref_810" href="#note_810"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">810</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">End of the quarrel between Gloucester and Beaufort.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The two brothers had not met since the death of
+Henry V. After prolonged negotiations, a <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">modus
+vivendi</span></span> between the parties was arrived at, and
+Gloucester and the bishop were induced to shake
+hands. Beaufort left England soon afterwards with
+the Duke of Bedford, on the plea of making a pilgrimage,
+and did not return until September, 1428,
+by which time he had been made a cardinal and
+appointed papal legate in England. Notwithstanding
+his legatine authority being unacknowledged by
+Gloucester and others, the citizens received him on
+his return "worthily and loyally," riding out to
+meet him and escorting him into London.<a id="noteref_811" name="noteref_811" href="#note_811"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">811</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Gloucester loses the favour of the citizens.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Gloucester had always been a favourite with the
+Londoners, until his conduct to his Flemish wife,
+whom he left behind on the continent to fight her
+own battles as best as she could, and the undisguised
+attention he paid to Eleanor Cobham, a lady in his
+wife's suite, whom he eventually married, estranged
+their favour. In August, 1424, the Common Council
+had voted the duke a gift of 500 marks; and two
+years later—viz., in April, 1426—the citizens raised a
+sum, variously stated to have been £1,000 and 1,000
+marks, for the benefit of his duchess.<a id="noteref_812" name="noteref_812" href="#note_812"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">812</span></span></a> The female<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page272">[pg 272]</span><a name="Pg272" id="Pg272" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+portion of the community were specially incensed
+against the duke, and a number of women went the
+length of presenting themselves before parliament in
+1427, with a letter complaining of his behaviour towards
+his wife. In March of the next year (1428)
+the citizens themselves followed suit, and drew the
+attention of parliament, through the mouth of John
+Symond, their Recorder, to the wretched straits to
+which the duchess had been reduced, as witnessed her
+own letters. They begged parliament to consider the
+best means for recovering for her the lands of Hainault,
+Holland and Zeeland, which had always been
+places of sure refuge for the English merchant, and
+the rulers of which had ever been friendly to the king
+of England. The citizens finally avowed themselves
+ready to take upon themselves their share in any
+undertaking the lords and commons of the realm might
+decide upon.<a id="noteref_813" name="noteref_813" href="#note_813"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">813</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The siege of Orleans, 1428-1429.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">In the meantime matters had not gone well with
+the English in France. In July, 1427, the Earl of
+Salisbury came over to London for reinforcements.<a id="noteref_814" name="noteref_814" href="#note_814"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">814</span></span></a>
+In September of the following year he was able to
+inform the City of the success that had attended his
+recruited army.<a id="noteref_815" name="noteref_815" href="#note_815"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">815</span></span></a> He was then within a short distance
+of Orleans, before which town he shortly afterwards
+met his death. Bedford continued the siege, but the
+town held out until May, 1429, when it was relieved
+by the Maid from the little village of Domremi, and
+the English army was compelled to retreat.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Famine in London, 1429.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Whilst Bedford was conducting the siege of
+Orleans, and Jeanne Darc was meditating how best to<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page273">[pg 273]</span><a name="Pg273" id="Pg273" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc158" id="toc158"></a>
+relieve the town, the citizens of London were suffering
+from a severe dearth. At length the Common
+Council resolved (22 July, 1429) to send agents
+abroad for the purpose of transmitting all the corn
+they could lay their hands on to England. The
+assistance of Bedford, who had by this time been
+compelled to raise the siege of Orleans, was invoked.<a id="noteref_816" name="noteref_816" href="#note_816"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">816</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Beaufort joins Bedford in France.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Bedford had recently been joined by Beaufort,
+who had become more than ever an object of hatred
+to Gloucester, and had lost to a certain extent the
+goodwill of the nation by the acceptance of a
+cardinal's hat. He had set out on the 22nd June
+(1429), carrying with him a small force which he was
+allowed to raise for the avowed object of prosecuting
+a Hussite crusade in Bohemia, but which was
+eventually sent to France.<a id="noteref_817" name="noteref_817" href="#note_817"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">817</span></span></a> The question of his
+position in parliament and the council, now that he
+was a cardinal, was decided by the parliament which
+met on the 22nd September.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Allowances made to those representing the City in parliament, 1429.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Members of parliament representing the City of
+London had hitherto been allowed a certain amount
+of cloth and fur trimming at the City's expense,
+wherewith to dress themselves and their personal
+attendants in a manner suitable to the position they
+held. Those who had from time to time been elected
+members appear to have abused this privilege—where
+a yard had been given, they had literally taken
+an ell—and it was now thought to be high time to
+take steps to check the abuse in future. Accordingly
+it was ordained by the mayor and aldermen, on the
+12th August of this year (and the ordinance met with<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page274">[pg 274]</span><a name="Pg274" id="Pg274" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+the approval of the commoners on the 29th day of
+the same month), that for the future no alderman
+elected to attend parliament should take out of the
+chamber or of the commonalty more than ten yards
+for gown and cloak, at 15<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">s.</span></span> the yard, and 100<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">s.</span></span>
+for fur if the alderman had already served as
+mayor, otherwise he was to have no more than five
+marks. Commoners were to be content with five
+yards of cloth and 33<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">s.</span></span> 4<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">d.</span></span> for fur. Each alderman,
+moreover, was to be allowed eight yards of cloth
+at 28 pence a yard for two personal attendants,
+and each commoner four yards of the same for one
+attendant, if the parliament was sitting in London or
+the neighbourhood, and eight yards for two attendants
+if parliament was sitting in some more remote place,
+"as was formerly ordained during the mayoralty of
+John Michell" (1424-5).<a id="noteref_818" name="noteref_818" href="#note_818"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">818</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The coronation of Henry VI, 6 Nov., 1429.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The condition of France necessitated the early
+coronation of the young king, whose right to the
+French crown had been established by the Treaty of
+Troyes. At his accession to the throne of England
+Henry VI was but a child of nine months. He was
+now eight years old. Before he could be crowned
+King of France, it was necessary that he should first
+be crowned King of England. Proclamation was
+accordingly made that he would be crowned on the
+6th November following, and that all claims to services
+should be forthwith laid before the lord steward.<a id="noteref_819" name="noteref_819" href="#note_819"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">819</span></span></a><span class="tei tei-pb" id="page275">[pg 275]</span><a name="Pg275" id="Pg275" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc159" id="toc159"></a>
+Gregory, to whose chronicle we have had frequent
+occasion to refer, writing as an eye-witness, gives
+a full account<a id="noteref_820" name="noteref_820" href="#note_820"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">820</span></span></a> of what took place at the ceremony
+of coronation in Westminster Abbey, and of
+the banquet that followed; but omits to mention
+that the citizens put in their usual claim, in accordance
+with the above proclamation, to serve the king
+at the banquet as butler. That the claim was actually
+made we learn from other sources.<a id="noteref_821" name="noteref_821" href="#note_821"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">821</span></span></a> We also know
+that William Estfeld, the recently-elected mayor,
+received the customary gold cup and ewer used on
+the occasion, which he afterwards bequeathed to his
+grandson.<a id="noteref_822" name="noteref_822" href="#note_822"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">822</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Sets out for France, April, 1430.</span></div></div>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">And is crowned in Paris, Dec., 1431.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">In April, 1430, the young king left England for
+France, and remained abroad for nearly two years.
+On the 10th November he wrote to the mayor and
+citizens, urging them to advance him the sum of
+10,000 marks, as that sum might do him more ease
+and service at that particular time than double the
+amount at another. The letter was dated from
+Rouen, where the court afterwards established itself
+for a considerable time.<a id="noteref_823" name="noteref_823" href="#note_823"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">823</span></span></a> On Sunday, the 12th December,
+1431, he made his entry into Paris with great
+ceremony, and was duly crowned.<a id="noteref_824" name="noteref_824" href="#note_824"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">824</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The citizens welcome him on his return, 1432.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">On his return to England early in the following
+year, he was met by John Welles, the mayor, the
+aldermen, the sheriffs, and more than 12,000 citizens<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page276">[pg 276]</span><a name="Pg276" id="Pg276" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+of London, who rode out on Thursday, the 20th
+February, as far as Blackheath, and was there presented
+with the following address:—</p>
+
+<div class="block tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.80em; margin-left: 3.60em; margin-top: 1.80em; margin-right: 3.60em"><span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-size: 90%; font-style: italic">"Sovereign lord as welcome be ye to your noble
+Roialme of Englond, and in especial to your notable
+Cite London oþerwise called your Chambre, as ever
+was cristen prince to place or people, and of the good
+and gracioux achevyng of your Coronne of Fraunce,
+we thank hertlich our lord almyghty which of his
+endles mercy sende you grace in yoye and prosperite
+on us and all your other people long for to regne."</span></span></div>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The mayor and aldermen present him with a gift of £1,000.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">After hearing the address the king rode to
+Deptford, where he was met by a procession of 120
+rectors and curates of the city, in the richest copes,
+and 500 secular chaplains in the whitest of surplices,
+with whom were a like number of monks bearing
+crosses, tapers and incense, and chanting psalms
+and antiphons in grateful thanks for his safe return.
+Thence the royal cavalcade passed through Southwark
+to the city, where pageants appeared at every
+turn. The fulsome adulation bestowed upon a lad
+scarcely ten years of age was enough to turn his
+young brain. Passing through Cornhill and Chepe, the
+procession eventually reached St. Paul's. There the
+king dismounted, and being met by the Archbishop
+of Canterbury and ten other bishops in their pontifical
+robes, was led by them to the high altar. Prayers
+were said and the sacred relics kissed. The king
+then remounted his horse and made his way to his
+palace of Westminster, the streets being hung with
+tapestry and the houses thronged to their roofs with
+crowds of onlookers, and was there allowed a brief
+day's rest. On the following Saturday a deputation<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page277">[pg 277]</span><a name="Pg277" id="Pg277" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc160" id="toc160"></a>
+from the city, headed by the mayor and aldermen,
+went to the palace and presented Henry with £1,000
+of the purest gold, in a gold casket, with these
+words:—</p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">"<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Most cristen prince the good folk of youre notable
+Cite of London, otherwise cleped your Chambre, besechen
+in her most lowely wise that they mowe be recomanded
+un to yo</span><span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic; vertical-align: super">r</span></span><span style="font-style: italic"> hynesse, ant þ</span><span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic; vertical-align: super">t</span></span><span style="font-style: italic"> can like youre noble grace to
+resceyve this litell yefte yoven with as good will and
+lovyng hertes as any yefte was yoven to eny erthly
+prince.</span></span>"</p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The king having graciously acknowledged the
+gift, the deputation returned to the city.<a id="noteref_825" name="noteref_825" href="#note_825"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">825</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Gloucester's attacks on Beaufort and Bedford, 1432-1433.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Beaufort, who had returned home in time for
+the coronation, had again set out for France with
+the king, and Gloucester took advantage of their
+absence to renew his attack on his rival. Letters of
+<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">prœmunire</span></span> were drawn up in anticipation of the cardinal's
+return, and additional offence was given by the
+seizure of the cardinal's plate and jewels at Dover.
+On learning of Gloucester's schemes, Beaufort determined
+to give up a projected visit to Rome, and to
+return home in time for the opening of parliament
+(12th May, 1432).<a id="noteref_826" name="noteref_826" href="#note_826"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">826</span></span></a> He desired to learn why he had
+been thus "strangely demeened" contrary to his
+deserts. When parliament met and the cardinal
+asked who were his accusers, Gloucester held his<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page278">[pg 278]</span><a name="Pg278" id="Pg278" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+tongue, and the king expressed his confidence in the
+cardinal's loyalty. In the following year (1433)
+Bedford appeared before parliament and announced
+that he had come home to defend himself against
+false accusations. He understood that the recent
+losses that had occurred in France were attributed to
+his neglect. He desired his accusers, of whom he
+shrewdly suspected Gloucester to be one, to stand
+forth and prove their charges. Again there was
+silence, and the duke, like the cardinal, had to rest
+satisfied with the king's assurance of loyalty.<a id="noteref_827" name="noteref_827" href="#note_827"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">827</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Financial reform, 1433.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The finances of the country were at this time
+(1433) in the most deplorable condition. It was
+necessary to exercise the strictest economy. Bedford
+was the first to set an example of self-denial
+by offering to discharge the duties of counsellor at a
+reduced salary. Gloucester followed his brother's
+example. The archbishops, the cardinal, and the
+bishops of Lincoln and Ely agreed to render their
+services without payment. Parliament showed its
+good will by voting a fifteenth and tenth, but out of
+the sum thus realised £4,000 was to be applied to
+the relief of poor towns. The amount of relief
+which fell to the share of the poorer wards of the
+City of London was £76 15<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">s.</span></span> 6-1/4<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">d.</span></span>, which was
+apportioned among eighteen wards. The largest sum
+allotted was £20, which went to Cordwainer Street
+Ward, whilst Lime Street Ward received the magnificent
+relief afforded by the odd farthing.<a id="noteref_828" name="noteref_828" href="#note_828"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">828</span></span></a> The
+mayor, sheriffs and aldermen were called upon to
+attend in person before the chancellor, in April, 1434,
+to make oath that they would duly observe a certain<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page279">[pg 279]</span><a name="Pg279" id="Pg279" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc161" id="toc161"></a>
+article (<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">quendam articulum</span></span>) which the late parliament
+had agreed to, but what this article was does not
+appear in the City's archives.<a id="noteref_829" name="noteref_829" href="#note_829"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">829</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The death of Bedford, 14 Sept., 1435.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Bedford was prevailed upon to remain in England
+and undertake the office of chief counsellor, but
+differences again arising between him and Gloucester,
+which the personal interference of the young king
+could with difficulty calm, he again set sail for France
+(June, 1434). His career was fast drawing to an end.
+Burgundy was intending to desert him as he knew
+full well, and the knowledge accelerated his end.
+His death took place at Rouen on the 14th September
+of the following year (1435).<a id="noteref_830" name="noteref_830" href="#note_830"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">830</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Calais appeals to London for assistance, 27 June, 1436.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">With his death England's supremacy in France
+began to decline, and Henry VI was to lose in that
+country all or nearly all that had been gained by his
+doughty predecessor. The defection of Burgundy
+was followed by the loss of Paris. The chief event
+of 1436 was the raising of the siege of Calais, which
+had been invested by the Duke of Burgundy. On
+the 27th June the mayor and aldermen of Calais,
+being anxious to get help from the government at
+home, and finding that according to precedent they
+could only do so through the mediation of the City of
+London, addressed a letter to the mayor and aldermen
+of London imploring them, as the head of "the
+principal of all the cities of the realm of England," to
+move the king to send the requisite aid.<a id="noteref_831" name="noteref_831" href="#note_831"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">831</span></span></a></p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">In answer to this appeal Henry Frowyk, the
+mayor, consulted the livery companies, and by their<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page280">[pg 280]</span><a name="Pg280" id="Pg280" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+advice sent a contingent to the relief of the town.<a id="noteref_832" name="noteref_832" href="#note_832"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">832</span></span></a>
+The king, too, had been very urgent that the City
+should raise a force to oppose "the man who stiled
+himself Duke of Burgundy and Count of Flanders,"
+whilst he took pains to conciliate such Flemings as
+were living in the city and were ready to take an oath
+of allegiance.<a id="noteref_833" name="noteref_833" href="#note_833"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">833</span></span></a> Gloucester had been appointed captain
+of Calais for a term of nine years, but before he
+set sail for its relief the siege had been raised by
+Edmund Beaufort, Count of Mortain.<a id="noteref_834" name="noteref_834" href="#note_834"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">834</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">A tax imposed on aliens, 1439.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">An attempt was made in 1439 to bring about a
+peace, but it failed, and a new tax—a tax upon aliens—had
+to be imposed for the purpose of raising money
+in addition to the usual supplies. Every alien householder
+was called upon to pay sixteen pence, and
+every alien who was not a householder sixpence, towards
+the expenses of the country.<a id="noteref_835" name="noteref_835" href="#note_835"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">835</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The penance of Eleanor Cobham, Gloucester's wife, 1441.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The streets of the city have witnessed few sadder
+sights than the penance inflicted on Eleanor
+Cobham, at one time the mistress, and afterwards—on
+the dissolution of his marriage with Jacqueline—the
+wife of Gloucester. The new duchess was aware
+that in the event of the king's death her husband was
+next in succession to the throne, and was inclined to
+anticipate matters. It was a superstitious age, and
+the duchess invoked the aid of witchcraft to accomplish
+her wishes. In 1441 her operations, innocent as<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page281">[pg 281]</span><a name="Pg281" id="Pg281" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc162" id="toc162"></a>
+they were in themselves, however bad their intent,
+were discovered, and she was condemned to do public
+penance followed by imprisonment for life. For three
+days the wretched lady was made to walk the streets,
+taper in hand and bare-foot (it was November), in the
+sight of all the citizens, who were forbidden to show
+her any respect, but, at the same time, were ordered
+not to molest her.<a id="noteref_836" name="noteref_836" href="#note_836"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">836</span></span></a> The latter they were little likely
+to do. Nay! on each day as she landed at the
+Temple, at the Swan or at Oueenhithe, the mayor
+and sheriffs went forth to attend her, accompanied by
+members of the livery companies.<a id="noteref_837" name="noteref_837" href="#note_837"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">837</span></span></a> Yet, not a finger
+did her husband raise in her defence! He either
+could not or would not save her.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The king's charter to the City, 26 Oct., 1444.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">By charter, dated the 26th day of October, 1444,
+the king confirmed the mayor, recorder and certain
+aldermen as justices of the peace, and, among other
+things, granted to the corporation the soil of the
+Thames within the City's liberties.<a id="noteref_838" name="noteref_838" href="#note_838"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">838</span></span></a> This grant was
+not made without some little opposition from the
+inhabitants of the neighbouring county of Surrey.<a id="noteref_839" name="noteref_839" href="#note_839"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">839</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Henry's marriage with Margaret of Anjou, 22 April, 1445.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The king was now under the influence of William
+de la Pole, Earl of Suffolk, by whose intervention a
+truce with France had been concluded on the 28th
+May of this year (1444), to last until the 1st April,
+1446. In order to strengthen the truce, a marriage<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page282">[pg 282]</span><a name="Pg282" id="Pg282" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+was arranged between Henry and Margaret of Anjou.
+The princess came over to England early in the following
+year, and was married on the 22nd April (1445).
+The match was not altogether a popular one; nevertheless,
+when Margaret passed through the city on
+her way to be crowned at Westminster, she was received
+"in the most goodly wise, with alle the
+citezines on horseback ridyng ayenst hir to the
+Blackheth in blew gownes and rede hodes."<a id="noteref_840" name="noteref_840" href="#note_840"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">840</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Jack Cade's rebellion, 1450.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The truce was renewed, and Suffolk increased in
+popularity. After the deaths of Gloucester and
+Cardinal Beaufort, within a few weeks of each other,
+in 1447, he became the king's chief adviser, and continued
+to be so until the loss of the French provinces
+three years later (1450) raised so much opposition
+against him that the king was compelled to order his
+banishment. This was not thought a sufficient
+punishment by his enemies, and he was taken on the
+high seas and brutally murdered (2 May). After his
+death an attack was made on his supporters. Again
+the men of Kent rose in revolt; this time under the
+leadership of an Irish adventurer—Jack Cade—who
+called himself Mortimer, and gave out that he was an
+illegitimate son of the late Earl of March. They
+mustered on Blackheath 30,000 strong (1 June), and
+then awaited the king's return from Leicester, where
+parliament had been sitting. Henry on his arrival
+sent to learn the reason of the gathering, and in
+reply received a long list of grievances which the
+rebels intended to amend.<a id="noteref_841" name="noteref_841" href="#note_841"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">841</span></span></a> Notwithstanding the<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page283">[pg 283]</span><a name="Pg283" id="Pg283" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+boldness of this answer, the king had only to make
+proclamation that all his true and liege subjects should
+"a-voyde the fylde," for the whole force to disperse
+in the course of one night. The danger, indeed,
+seemed to be over. A week later, however, the
+royal force met a number of the rebels near Sevenoaks,
+by whom it was put to rout. Encouraged by this
+success, the rebels returned and took up their
+quarters in Southwark. The unhappy king had by
+this time retired to Kenilworth, notwithstanding the
+offer made by the citizens of London to stand by him.<a id="noteref_842" name="noteref_842" href="#note_842"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">842</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The city prepares to defend itself.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The city authorities had, in the meantime, taken
+steps to put the city into a state of defence. A Common
+Council met on the 8th June, when it decided
+that an efficient guard should be placed night and day
+upon all gates, wharves and lanes leading to the
+Thames. An enclosure recently erected at "le Crane"
+on the riverside belonging to John Trevillian, was
+ordered to be abated. Balistic machines (<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">fundibula</span></span>)
+of all kinds were to be collected on the wharves,
+whilst the sale of weapons or armour or their
+removal out of the city was restricted. Lastly, it
+was agreed to represent to the king the advisability
+of limiting the number of his nobles coming into the
+city, owing to the scarcity of provisions.<a id="noteref_843" name="noteref_843" href="#note_843"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">843</span></span></a> On the
+26th June the Common Council again met, and it
+was then decided to send two mounted men to reconnoitre
+Cade's position, and to learn, if possible, his<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page284">[pg 284]</span><a name="Pg284" id="Pg284" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+movements.<a id="noteref_844" name="noteref_844" href="#note_844"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">844</span></span></a> Three days later (29 June) orders were
+given for four men to be selected from each ward to
+assist the aldermen in preserving the peace. Anyone
+refusing to do his duty in keeping watch was to be
+sent to prison. In spite of all precautions, Cade and
+his followers succeeded in gaining a footing in the city
+(3 July), their first action being to sack the house of
+Philip Malpas.<a id="noteref_845" name="noteref_845" href="#note_845"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">845</span></span></a> Cade himself encouraged rather
+than restrained the excesses of his men. "Now is
+Mortimer lord of the City," he cried as he struck with
+his sword the old Roman mile-stone known as
+London stone.<a id="noteref_846" name="noteref_846" href="#note_846"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">846</span></span></a> It is clear that the rebels had friends
+in the city, otherwise they would never have effected
+an entrance so easily—"They had othyr men with
+hem as welle of London as of there owne party."<a id="noteref_847" name="noteref_847" href="#note_847"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">847</span></span></a>
+The matter was made the subject of investigation by
+the Common Council. Evidence was given by
+Thomas Geffrey, a barber, to the effect that on
+Friday, the 3rd July, the keys of the bridge had been
+given up, but by whom he knew not. William
+Reynold also deposed that Richard Philip, a grocer,
+had told him that unless the wardens of the bridge
+opened the gates, the Kentish captain threatened to
+set fire to the bridge and the city, and that thereupon
+Thomas Godfrey, a "sporyour," clad in russet,
+brought the keys and opened the gates.<a id="noteref_848" name="noteref_848" href="#note_848"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">848</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Mock trials held by the rebels at the Guildhall.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">On Saturday, the 4th of July, the rebels, who
+had retired for the night, returned to the city.<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page285">[pg 285]</span><a name="Pg285" id="Pg285" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc163" id="toc163"></a>
+Robert Horne, alderman of Bridge Ward, who had
+rendered himself especially obnoxious to the rebels,
+was made prisoner and sent to Newgate. Sir James
+Fiennes, the Lord Say, was brought from the Tower
+to the Guildhall, where the rebels were holding mock
+trials on those who were unfortunate enough to fall
+into their hands, and, after a hasty examination, was
+conveyed to the Standard in Chepe and there executed.
+His head, together with those of two others who had
+that day suffered a similar fate, was set up on London
+Bridge.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Cade apprehended.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">By the next evening (Sunday) the citizens had
+managed to recover their presence of mind, and
+sallied out at ten o'clock at night, under the leadership
+of Lord Scales and another, across the bridge.
+Before they had arrived on the Southwark side of the
+river they were met by the rebels, and a severe fight
+took place between the parties on the bridge itself,
+lasting until eight o'clock the next morning. At last
+the rebels were defeated, and the city freed from their
+presence. Offers of pardon were made and accepted,
+and the rebels dispersed. Cade, however, continued
+to plunder and ravage the country, until a price having
+been put upon his head, he was apprehended by the
+Sheriff of Kent,<a id="noteref_849" name="noteref_849" href="#note_849"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">849</span></span></a> and died the same night from injuries
+received at his capture. His head was subsequently
+set up on London Bridge.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The question of the succession to the throne.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The king had now been married some years, and
+no heir had appeared. Great uncertainty prevailed<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page286">[pg 286]</span><a name="Pg286" id="Pg286" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+as to the right of succession to the throne, and gave
+rise to much rivalry and mutual mistrust between
+Richard, Duke of York, who now for the first time
+becomes a conspicuous figure on the stage, and
+Edmund Beaufort, recently created Duke of Somerset.
+Both of them could claim to be the king's nearest kinsmen,
+both of them being descendants of Edward III,
+the one tracing his descent, on his father's side,
+through Edmund Langley, and on his mother's side,
+through Lionel, Duke of Clarence, whilst the other
+was the surviving representative of John of Gaunt.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Rivalry between the Dukes of York and Somerset, 1450.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The king's incapacity to govern without a strong
+minister at his back, as evinced by his conduct
+during the recent outbreak, induced both of these
+nobles to throw up their appointments, the one in
+Ireland and the other in France, and to hasten home.
+The Duke of York was the first to reach England,
+and, in spite of measures which had been taken to
+intercept him, made his way to London. He was
+anxious in the first place to clear himself of suspicion
+of having been implicated in Cade's rebellion,<a id="noteref_850" name="noteref_850" href="#note_850"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">850</span></span></a> and to
+this end sought and obtained an interview with the
+king. Having satisfied Henry on this point, he next
+proceeded to demand the reform of certain abuses in
+the government. A short session of parliament, which
+met on the 6th November, opened with an altercation
+between the rival dukes. On the 1st December
+Somerset was placed under arrest; and on the following
+day his lodgings at the Black Friars were broken
+into and pillaged. An example was made of one of<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page287">[pg 287]</span><a name="Pg287" id="Pg287" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc164" id="toc164"></a>
+the men convicted of being concerned in the breaking
+into the Black Friars, and he was beheaded at the
+Standard in Chepe. The Duke of York made a personal
+visit to the city, and caused proclamation to
+be made of the heavy pains and penalties which
+should follow any attempt at robbery. As a further
+demonstration against lawlessness, the king himself
+rode through the city a few days later, accompanied
+by his lords in full panoply, the route being kept by
+a line of armed citizens on either side of the way.
+Alderman Gregory, whose chronicle affords us a vivid
+picture of contemporary events, and who was called
+upon to serve the office of mayor of the city the
+following year, confesses that the procession on this
+occasion would have been a gay and glorious sight,
+"if hit hadde ben in Fraunce, but not in Ingelonde,"
+for it boded little good.<a id="noteref_851" name="noteref_851" href="#note_851"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">851</span></span></a></p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The Duke of Somerset did not long remain in
+prison, for immediately after Christmas he was appointed
+captain of Calais. In 1451 the disasters
+which followed the English arms in France, when
+Calais was again threatened, were made an occasion
+for another attempt by York to crush his rival. He
+openly avowed his determination to proceed against
+Somerset, and, joined by the Earl of Devonshire
+and Lord Cobham, marched to London (Jan., 1452).
+Henry at once prepared to march against his cousin.
+The duke had hoped that through the influence of his
+party within the city, the gates would have been
+flung open on his approach. In this he was disappointed.
+The majority of the citizens were still
+loyal to Henry, and by his orders entrance was denied<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page288">[pg 288]</span><a name="Pg288" id="Pg288" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+the duke, who thereupon withdrew to Dartford, whilst
+the king's forces encamped at Blackheath.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Civil war averted.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">For a time civil war was avoided, the king
+promising that Somerset should be again committed
+to custody until he should answer such charges as York
+should bring against him. The king, however, failed
+to keep his word. Somerset was allowed to remain
+in power, and York was only allowed his liberty after
+he had consented to swear public allegiance to the
+king in St. Paul's Church. Any stronger measures
+taken against him would probably have provoked
+disturbance in the city.<a id="noteref_852" name="noteref_852" href="#note_852"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">852</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The king's illness, 1453.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Henry's mind had never been strong, and in the
+following year (1453) it entirely gave way. In
+October the queen bore him a son, after eight years
+of married life, but though the infant was brought to
+his father, Henry gave no signs of recognising his
+presence. The illness of the king, and the birth of an
+heir to the crown, were events which materially
+affected the fortunes of the Duke of York. In November
+the civic authorities prepared for emergencies;
+every citizen was to provide himself with armour, but
+he was strictly enjoined to be guarded in his conversation,
+and not to provoke tumult by showing favour
+to this or that lord. Even a proposal that the mayor
+and aldermen should pay a visit of respect to the
+Duke of York was rejected as impolitic at the present
+juncture.<a id="noteref_853" name="noteref_853" href="#note_853"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">853</span></span></a></p>
+
+<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page289">[pg 289]</span><a name="Pg289" id="Pg289" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The City again called upon to assist in the defence of Calais, 1453-1454.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Notwithstanding liberal grants made by parliament
+for the defence of Calais, that town was still in
+danger. On the 29th November, 1453, a letter was
+read before the Common Council of the City, emanating
+from the Lord Welles and the Lord Ryvers,
+asking for assistance towards putting Calais into a
+state of defence. Further consideration of the matter
+was adjourned until the following 4th December. By
+the 7th day of the same month the Council had consulted
+the commons, who had declared that owing to
+their numerous burdens and expenses they could contribute
+nothing to that end.<a id="noteref_854" name="noteref_854" href="#note_854"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">854</span></span></a> This did not prevent a
+further application being made early in 1454, for contributions
+towards the defence of Calais if that town
+were besieged.<a id="noteref_855" name="noteref_855" href="#note_855"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">855</span></span></a> Again the commons were consulted,
+and again they pleaded the excessive burdens they
+were already called upon to bear, and the losses they
+had sustained by seizure of their ships and merchandise
+by the Duke of Burgundy, rendering them unable for
+the present to undertake any further charges unless
+steps were taken for the recovery of their goods.<a id="noteref_856" name="noteref_856" href="#note_856"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">856</span></span></a> An
+answer to this effect was accordingly delivered by the
+Common Sergeant on behalf of the citizens, who declared
+themselves willing at the same time to bear their
+share with the rest of the realm.<a id="noteref_857" name="noteref_857" href="#note_857"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">857</span></span></a> An appeal made in
+August of the same year (1454), for the sum of £1,200
+for the same purpose, met with similar failure.<a id="noteref_858" name="noteref_858" href="#note_858"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">858</span></span></a></p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The plea of poverty was no idle one, if we may
+judge from the fact that when, in November of this
+year, an assessment of half a fifteenth was made on
+the city wards, eleven out of twenty-five wards were<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page290">[pg 290]</span><a name="Pg290" id="Pg290" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+in default.<a id="noteref_859" name="noteref_859" href="#note_859"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">859</span></span></a> Between the years 1431 and 1451 the
+citizens had advanced large sums of money to the
+king, of which more than £3,000 remained in the
+latter year due to the city.<a id="noteref_860" name="noteref_860" href="#note_860"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">860</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The Duke of York and his supporters take up their quarters in the city, 1454.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">A crisis, in the meanwhile, was fast approaching.
+The birth of an heir to the throne urged the Duke of
+York to take prompt action. Although the majority
+of the nobles were opposed to him, he had on his side
+the powerful family of the Nevills, having married
+Cicely Nevill, sister of Richard Nevill, Earl of Salisbury,
+the head of the family, and father of the still
+more powerful Earl of Warwick. Towards the end of
+January (1454) the Duke of York, the Earls of Salisbury
+and Warwick, and others of the duke's supporters,
+entered the city, each followed by a large force of retainers
+fully armed. With them came also York's eldest
+son, the Earl of March, afterwards King Edward IV.<a id="noteref_861" name="noteref_861" href="#note_861"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">861</span></span></a></p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The Common Council were anxious lest the presence
+of these nobles in the city should lead to a disturbance.
+A strict neutrality was ordered to be observed
+both by the mayor and aldermen, as well as by
+the inhabitants of the city at large. The <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">waytes</span></span>, or
+watchmen, were ordered to perambulate the streets
+every night with their minstrels to keep the citizens in
+good humour (<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">pro recreacione hominum</span></span>), and prevent
+robbery. Nevertheless, there is evidence to show
+that disturbances did occasionally arise between the
+inhabitants and those in the suite of the nobles.<a id="noteref_862" name="noteref_862" href="#note_862"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">862</span></span></a></p>
+
+<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page291">[pg 291]</span><a name="Pg291" id="Pg291" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc165" id="toc165"></a>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The Duke of York nominated protector, 1454.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The king's continued illness necessitated sooner
+or later the appointment of a regent. For a brief
+space there seemed a possibility of the regency being
+claimed by the queen. The City, in the meanwhile,
+paid court to both parties, the mayor and aldermen
+one day paying a solemn visit to the queen, attired in
+their gowns of scarlet, and a few days later paying a
+similar compliment to the Duke of York.<a id="noteref_863" name="noteref_863" href="#note_863"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">863</span></span></a> At length
+the duke was nominated protector (3 April). Some
+correspondence ensued between the City, the Duke
+of York, the queen, and the Earl of Salisbury, on
+what subject we know not,<a id="noteref_864" name="noteref_864" href="#note_864"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">864</span></span></a> but on the 13th May
+the mayor and aldermen waited upon the duke to
+thank him for his favour and goodwill.<a id="noteref_865" name="noteref_865" href="#note_865"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">865</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The first battle of St. Albans, 22 May, 1455.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">So long as the king remained an imbecile York
+was supreme, his rival, Somerset, having been committed
+to prison at his instigation in December, 1453.
+Henry, however, soon recovered from his illness,
+although his convalescence proved of equally short
+duration, and York's protectorate came to an end.
+With Henry's restoration came the release of Somerset,
+and York determined to try conclusions with his
+rival in the field. At the first battle of St. Albans,
+fought on the 22nd May, 1455, victory declared for
+York and Somerset was killed. After the battle
+York accompanied the king to London and lodged
+him in the bishop's palace in St. Paul's churchyard.
+The excitement caused Henry a relapse, and York was
+for the second time named protector; but in the
+spring of 1456 he had again to retire upon the king's
+recovery.</p>
+
+<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page292">[pg 292]</span><a name="Pg292" id="Pg292" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">A rising against the Lombards in the city, May, 1456.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Just when the country was settling down to enjoy
+a period of comparative quiet, there occurred (May,
+1456) in the city one of those sudden outbreaks
+against the "merchant stranger" residing within the
+city's walls which too often appear in the annals of
+London. On this occasion the young mercers of the
+city rose against the Lombards; why or wherefore
+we are not told. We only know that these foreigners
+received such bad treatment that they meditated
+leaving the city in a body and setting up business
+elsewhere. The fault was not altogether with the
+citizens, it appears; for two Lombards were ordered
+to be hanged.<a id="noteref_866" name="noteref_866" href="#note_866"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">866</span></span></a></p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The king, who was at the time at Coventry—whither
+the queen had caused him to be removed,
+owing to her suspicion that the Londoners were in
+favour of the Yorkist party—sent for alderman
+Cantelowe,<a id="noteref_867" name="noteref_867" href="#note_867"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">867</span></span></a> a mercer, and promptly committed him
+to Dudley Castle for safe keeping, as having been
+implicated in the attack on the houses of the Italian
+merchants.</p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">This outbreak was followed by another "hurlynge"
+between the mercers of the city and those
+Lombards who had consented to remain in the city on
+the understanding that they should be allowed to ply<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page293">[pg 293]</span><a name="Pg293" id="Pg293" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+their business without molestation until the council or
+parliament should determine otherwise. In consequence
+of this second outbreak no less than 28 mercers
+were arrested and committed to Windsor Castle.<a id="noteref_868" name="noteref_868" href="#note_868"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">868</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Letter from the king for safe-guarding the city, 3 Sept., 1456.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">On the 3rd September, 1456, the king wrote from
+Lichfield to the Mayor, reminding him of the dangers
+which had recently threatened the city—"the king's
+chamber"—the government whereof ought to serve as
+an example to the rest of the kingdom, and enjoining
+him that thenceforth he should allow no one to enter
+the city but such as came peaceably, and with
+moderate retinue, according to his estate and degree,
+and should take precautions against gatherings of
+evil disposed persons which might lead to a breach
+of the peace.<a id="noteref_869" name="noteref_869" href="#note_869"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">869</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The citizens offer to man and victual ships to punish France, 1457.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Notwithstanding the precautions taken to protect
+the coast, the French made a descent in 1457,
+and plundered Sandwich and Fowey, capturing over
+30 ships, great and small, and doing much damage.
+The citizens of London, to whom the protection of
+their commerce in the "narrow sea," as the channel
+was then frequently called, was everything, thereupon
+took counsel among themselves, and made a proposal
+to the king and to Bishop Waynflete, the chancellor,
+to find 2,000 men and provisions for certain ships then
+lying in the Thames, at their own expense, to join an
+expedition to punish the enemy for their boldness.
+The king thanked them for their patriotic spirit and
+gave orders for a naval force to join the city contingent
+from Hull.<a id="noteref_870" name="noteref_870" href="#note_870"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">870</span></span></a></p>
+
+<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page294">[pg 294]</span><a name="Pg294" id="Pg294" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">A general reconciliation at St. Paul's, 25 March, 1458.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">In 1458 Henry tried his hand at effecting a
+reconciliation between the two rival sections of the
+nobility, and to this end ordered a great council to
+meet in St. Paul's on the 27th January. Warwick
+left his post at Calais, and came over to London to
+attend the meeting; but he did not arrive until more
+than a month after the appointed day, and when he
+came it was with a body of 600 men at his back,
+"all apparyled in reed jakkettes, with whyte ragged
+stavis."<a id="noteref_871" name="noteref_871" href="#note_871"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">871</span></span></a> He took up his quarters within the city,
+where he found the Duke of York and the Earl of
+Salisbury. The young Duke of Somerset and other
+lords, who, like him, had lost their fathers at the
+battle of St. Albans, were refused an entrance to the
+city for fear of a breach of the peace, and had to find
+accommodation outside the city's walls.<a id="noteref_872" name="noteref_872" href="#note_872"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">872</span></span></a> During the
+conference the mayor patrolled the streets by day,
+whilst at night a force of 3,000 men was kept in
+readiness to assist the aldermen in preserving the
+king's peace.<a id="noteref_873" name="noteref_873" href="#note_873"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">873</span></span></a> The times were critical, but at length
+all ended well. A grand pacification took place in
+March, and was solemnized by an imposing procession
+to St. Paul's, in which York led the queen by the
+hand. The reconciliation thus effected was more
+apparent than real, and neither party relaxed their
+efforts to prepare for renewed hostility.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Warwick implicated in a riot, Nov., 1458.</span></div></div>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Seeks refuge in the city.</span></div></div>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Leaves for Calais.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">In August the civic companies were warned
+against furnishing the confederate lords with any war
+material, but were to keep their arms and harness at the<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page295">[pg 295]</span><a name="Pg295" id="Pg295" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc166" id="toc166"></a>
+disposal of the king alone.<a id="noteref_874" name="noteref_874" href="#note_874"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">874</span></span></a> It wanted very little to
+kindle the smouldering embers of dissatisfaction into
+a flame, and this little was soon forthcoming. In
+November<a id="noteref_875" name="noteref_875" href="#note_875"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">875</span></span></a> a riot occurred at Westminster, in which
+the Earl of Warwick was implicated. A yeoman in
+his suite picked a quarrel with one of the king's
+servants and wounded him. Thereupon others of the
+king's household, finding their fellow-servant wounded
+and his enemy escaped, way-laid the earl and his
+attendants as they left the council to take barge on
+the river. By dint of hard hitting, the earl managed
+to embark and to make his way to the city. But the
+affray was not without bloodshed, and Warwick found
+it convenient to withdraw soon afterwards to his post
+at Calais, which thenceforth became the head-quarters
+of the disaffected lords.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Riot between citizens and Templars, April, 1459.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">In the following April (1459) another affray
+broke out. This time it was between inhabitants of
+the city and certain members of the Inns of Court,
+and the riot was so dangerous as to result in loss of
+life. The king hearing of this sent for William
+Tayllour, the alderman of the ward, and kept him in
+confinement at Windsor until the election of the new
+mayor, William Hewlyn, in October, by whose intercession
+he regained his freedom.<a id="noteref_876" name="noteref_876" href="#note_876"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">876</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The battle of Blore Heath, 23 Sept., 1459.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">By this time the country was again divided into
+two hostile camps. A crisis came in September, when
+the Earl of Salisbury, the king's most inveterate
+enemy, marched upon Ludlow with a large force.<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page296">[pg 296]</span><a name="Pg296" id="Pg296" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+Lord Audley, sent by the queen to arrest him, was
+defeated by the earl at Blore Heath (23 Sept., 1459).
+Later on, however, the earl and the Yorkist army
+were themselves compelled to seek security. The
+Duke of York took refuge in Ireland, and the
+Earl of Warwick, who had crossed from France to join
+his father, returned to Calais, taking the Earl of Salisbury
+with him.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Parliament at Coventry, 20 Nov., 1459.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">On the 9th October the king issued his writ for
+a parliament to be held at Coventry on the 20th
+November. The usual writ was sent to the City
+of London, but the names of the aldermen and commoners
+elected to represent the citizens do not appear
+in the City's records.<a id="noteref_877" name="noteref_877" href="#note_877"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">877</span></span></a> The business of the session
+was the attainder of the Duke of York and his
+followers, and judgment was passed upon the duke,
+the Nevills, father and son, the young Earls of
+March and Rutland, and others. Two days after the
+date of this writ, the Common Council decided to send
+a deputation to wait upon the king and assure him of
+the City's allegiance and of the steps taken for its
+safe custody.<a id="noteref_878" name="noteref_878" href="#note_878"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">878</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The king loses favour.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The citizens had previously (Oct., 1459) displayed
+their willingness to assist the king by a gift of 1,000
+marks.<a id="noteref_879" name="noteref_879" href="#note_879"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">879</span></span></a> This gift must have been the more welcome,
+inasmuch as Henry's debts had been rapidly
+on the increase, whilst his creditors remained unpaid.
+The queen, on the other hand, into whose hands the
+government of the kingdom had been drawn, was
+"gaderyng riches innumerable." The imposition of
+taxes, talliages and fifteenths, whilst harassing the<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page297">[pg 297]</span><a name="Pg297" id="Pg297" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc167" id="toc167"></a>
+king's subjects, seemed to make him not a whit the
+richer, the issues and profits being frittered away.
+They would have forgiven him had he maintained a
+household in regal style or spent their money on
+maintaining the country's honour in the field. As
+matters were, Henry, by misgovernment, was rapidly
+losing the hearts of his people, and "theyre blessyng
+was turned in to cursyng."<a id="noteref_880" name="noteref_880" href="#note_880"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">880</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Unconstitutional conduct of the king in issuing commissions to raise an army, Jan., 1460.</span></div></div>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">A deputation from the City waits upon the king at Northampton.</span></div></div>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The City's liberties not to be prejudiced.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">On the 14th January, 1460, the king issued a
+commission to the mayor, aldermen and sheriffs for
+collecting men-at-arms and archers to resist the <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">late</span></span>
+Duke of York and the <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">late</span></span> Earls of March, Warwick,
+Salisbury and Rutland.<a id="noteref_881" name="noteref_881" href="#note_881"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">881</span></span></a> Similar commissions were
+addressed to every township,<a id="noteref_882" name="noteref_882" href="#note_882"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">882</span></span></a> and did much harm to
+the royal cause, now tottering to its fall, as being
+unconstitutional. They formed the subject of one of
+the set of articles of complaint drawn up by the Earls
+of March, Warwick and Salisbury, and addressed by
+them, on behalf of themselves and the Duke of York,
+to the archbishop and the commons of England.<a id="noteref_883" name="noteref_883" href="#note_883"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">883</span></span></a>
+Such commissions the lords declared to be an imposition
+which, if continued, would be "the heaviest
+charge and worst example that ever grew in England."
+The city authorities appear to have rested their opposition
+to the king's commission, not so much on the
+grounds that they were unwilling to raise a force for his<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page298">[pg 298]</span><a name="Pg298" id="Pg298" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+assistance, as that a demand for military aid in such a
+form might derogate from the city's franchise and
+liberties. A deputation, consisting of two aldermen,
+Thomas Urswyk, the Recorder, and one of the under-sheriffs,
+was sent to Northampton to wait upon the
+king and council and to explain the views of the
+citizens in that respect. The interview was of a satisfactory
+character; and the deputation returned bearing
+a gracious letter from the king declaring that the City's
+franchise and liberties should in no way be prejudiced
+by the commission.<a id="noteref_884" name="noteref_884" href="#note_884"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">884</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Military precautions taken by the City, Feb., 1460.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The citizens deemed it time to look to their own
+safety, and place their city into a better posture
+of defence. The master and wardens of the livery
+companies were exhorted (14 Feb., 1460), on account
+of the disturbed state of the kingdom, to raise contributions
+towards the purchase of accoutrements
+for the safeguard of the city.<a id="noteref_885" name="noteref_885" href="#note_885"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">885</span></span></a> The king himself was
+shortly coming into the city, and measures were taken
+(28 Feb.) for placing a proper guard over the several
+gates.<a id="noteref_886" name="noteref_886" href="#note_886"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">886</span></span></a> On the 11th May the masters and wardens
+were summoned, on behalf of the king, to appear
+before the mayor and aldermen at the Guildhall, to
+hear a royal proclamation read touching the preservation
+of the king's peace.<a id="noteref_887" name="noteref_887" href="#note_887"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">887</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Landing of the confederate earls.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The Yorkist Earls of Salisbury, Warwick and
+March, encouraged by the reports of the state of
+affairs in England, at length made up their minds to
+return and strike a blow for the recovery of their<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page299">[pg 299]</span><a name="Pg299" id="Pg299" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc168" id="toc168"></a>
+estates, which had become forfeited to the king. They
+set sail from Calais (26 June), and landing at Sandwich
+made their way without opposition through
+Kent to London.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The Common Council determine to oppose their entrance to the city, 27 June, 1460.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">On the 27th June, by which time news of their
+arrival must have reached the city, a Common
+Council was held, when the commoners who were present
+solemnly promised to stand by the mayor and
+aldermen in safe-guarding the city, and resist with all
+their might the rebels against the lord the king who
+were about to enter the city contrary to the king's
+orders. The civic companies somewhat tardily gave
+their adhesion to the royal cause, and agreed to
+defend the city. The gates were ordered to be
+manned, and no one was to be allowed to enter without
+first saying who and what he was. Strict
+enquiry was to be made as to the character of
+strangers residing within each of their wards.<a id="noteref_888" name="noteref_888" href="#note_888"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">888</span></span></a> On
+the following day the Common Council met again
+and gave orders that the drawbridge of London
+Bridge should be always kept down, so that victuallers
+and others might have ready access to the City,
+but the gateway on the drawbridge was to be kept
+closed, whilst <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">le wikett</span></span> was to be constantly open.
+A strict watch was to be kept on the new tower<a id="noteref_889" name="noteref_889" href="#note_889"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">889</span></span></a>
+above the bridge by men-at-arms stationed there,
+who should also be ready to let down <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">le port Colyce</span></span>
+when occasion required.<a id="noteref_890" name="noteref_890" href="#note_890"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">890</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Meeting of Common Council on Sunday, 29 June.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">A deputation, moreover, was appointed to set
+out to meet the Earls of March and Warwick on<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page300">[pg 300]</span><a name="Pg300" id="Pg300" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+their way to Northampton, for the purpose of inducing
+them, if possible, to turn aside and not approach
+the city. The members were instructed to inform
+the lords of the king's commands to the citizens
+to hold the city for him, and to oppose the lords'
+entry under heavy penalty. This instruction to the
+deputation was given, we are told, with the approval
+of the Archbishop of Canterbury, the Bishops
+of Norwich, Ely and Exeter, and of the Prior of St.
+John's, Clerkenwell. The mayor, aldermen and commonalty
+agreed to stand by any terms which the
+deputation might be compelled to make. They had
+not taken this step without first consulting the Lords
+Scales and Hungerford, and Sir Edmund Hampden,
+who held the Tower of London for King Henry.
+The bridge gate was ordered to be closed between
+nine and ten o'clock on the night of the 28th, and to
+remain closed till the morning. Even the portcullis
+was to be kept down if necessary, whilst the mayor
+and sheriffs, with a certain number of armed men,
+patrolled the city, and the aldermen kept watch in
+their several wards.<a id="noteref_891" name="noteref_891" href="#note_891"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">891</span></span></a> Notwithstanding the next day
+being Sunday, the critical state of affairs necessitated
+a meeting of the Common Council. It was then
+agreed that if any messenger should arrive from Warwick,
+no communication should be held with him.
+Special watches were appointed for the bridge and
+for Billingsgate by night and day, and so anxious
+were the authorities to avail themselves of the
+service of every abled citizen on that Sunday, that
+no one was allowed to attend Divine Service at St.
+Paul's.<a id="noteref_892" name="noteref_892" href="#note_892"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">892</span></span></a></p>
+
+<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page301">[pg 301]</span><a name="Pg301" id="Pg301" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The Yorkist earls admitted into the city, 2 July, 1460.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Up to this point the citizens had shown themselves
+loyal to Henry. They now began to waver.
+Early in the morning of the 30th June the mayor
+and aldermen appear to have changed their minds.
+The earls had sent them a letter and they resolved
+to receive it. The contents of this letter are not
+recorded. On the following day (1 July) another
+communication from the earls was received. Here
+again we are left in the dark as to its purport—the
+City's journals at this period being very imperfect,—we
+only know that they declined to accede to the request
+to keep at a distance from London, for the very next
+day (2 July) they were admitted into the city.<a id="noteref_893" name="noteref_893" href="#note_893"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">893</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The Tower holds out.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The city was thus lost to the king; but the Tower
+still held out, and no amount of eloquence on the
+part of certain doctors of divinity, whom the Common
+Council had appointed to try and arrange matters so
+as to avoid bloodshed, would induce Lord Scales and
+his companions to surrender it, although the garrison
+was hard pressed for victuals.<a id="noteref_894" name="noteref_894" href="#note_894"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">894</span></span></a> Nothing was left but
+to starve them out, and this the Earl of Salisbury
+proceeded to do, with the aid of the citizens and the
+boatmen on the river, by whom the Tower was
+strictly invested by land and water. The Common
+Council appear to have felt some qualms of conscience
+in joining in this proceeding, for they caused it to be recorded—as
+if by way of excuse for their action—that
+"there seemed to be no other way of preserving the
+city."<a id="noteref_895" name="noteref_895" href="#note_895"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">895</span></span></a> A resolution, moreover, that each alderman
+should subscribe the sum of £5 towards raising a<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page302">[pg 302]</span><a name="Pg302" id="Pg302" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+force to intercept victuals on their way to the Tower
+was rescinded.<a id="noteref_896" name="noteref_896" href="#note_896"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">896</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The Tower surrendered, 19 July.</span></div></div>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Murder of Lord Scales.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">By the 10th July matters had become so serious
+with the beleaguered garrison, that a letter was sent
+to the Common Council, signed by the Earl of Kendal,
+Lord Scales, Lord Hungerford, Lord Lovell and Sir
+Edmund Hampden, asking why war was thus being
+made upon them. To this the Council replied that
+the lords had brought it upon themselves by firing
+on the citizens in the first instance, and taking provisions
+from them without payment.<a id="noteref_897" name="noteref_897" href="#note_897"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">897</span></span></a> At last the
+garrison could hold out no longer, and the Tower was
+surrendered (19th July). Lord Scales endeavoured to
+take sanctuary at Westminster, but was seized by
+river boatmen and barbarously murdered.<a id="noteref_898" name="noteref_898" href="#note_898"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">898</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Battle of Northampton, 10 July, 1460.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Meanwhile the Duke of York had managed to
+raise a sum of money in the city;<a id="noteref_899" name="noteref_899" href="#note_899"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">899</span></span></a> the battle of
+Northampton had been won and lost (10th July),
+and Henry had been brought a prisoner to London
+(16th July). On the same day that the king arrived
+in London, the mayor, aldermen and commonalty of
+the City entered into an agreement, under the Common
+Seal, to abide by any arrangement made between
+the Earl of Salisbury and the beleaguered lords in the
+Tower for the surrender of that stronghold.<a id="noteref_900" name="noteref_900" href="#note_900"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">900</span></span></a></p>
+
+<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page303">[pg 303]</span><a name="Pg303" id="Pg303" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc169" id="toc169"></a>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Measures for restoring confidence in the city.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">On the 21st July the king, or the Earl of Warwick,
+in his name, attempted to restore quiet in the city by
+promising that those who had offended against the
+king's highness and the common weal of the realm,
+and had been committed to the Tower, should forthwith
+receive ample justice. In the meantime all
+conventicles, assemblies or congregations in breach of
+the peace were strictly forbidden, and every man was
+exhorted to repair to his own house, and wait upon
+his lord or master in whose service he might happen
+to be.<a id="noteref_901" name="noteref_901" href="#note_901"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">901</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Parliament of 7 Oct., 1460.</span></div></div>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The Duke of York's claim to the throne allowed.</span></div></div>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The Livery Companies declare their allegiance to the king.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">In October the Duke of York attended parliament
+and boldly asserted his right to the throne.
+After hearing arguments for and against his claim,
+parliament arrived at a compromise by which the
+reversion of the crown was settled on the duke, and
+to this the king himself was forced to give his assent.<a id="noteref_902" name="noteref_902" href="#note_902"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">902</span></span></a>
+It was otherwise with the proud and defiant Queen
+Margaret. She was determined to acquiesce in no
+such arrangement. Whilst she was collecting a force
+in the north, wherewith to strike one blow for the
+crown of which her son appeared likely to be robbed,
+the mayor and aldermen held an extraordinary meeting
+of the wardens of the livery companies. The
+king wished to be assured of the temper of the citizens.
+Would they as a body support him and his council,
+protect his royal person, and defend the city against
+those who were raising disturbances in divers parts of
+the realm? To each and all of these questions the wardens
+are recorded as having given satisfactory replies,<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page304">[pg 304]</span><a name="Pg304" id="Pg304" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+and it was then and there agreed that each alderman
+should make enquiry as to the number of strangers
+residing in his ward, and the reasons for their being
+in the city. Watch was to be kept by night in every
+ward, a lantern hung outside every dwelling-house,
+and the city's gates were to be closed every night and
+guarded by men-at-arms.<a id="noteref_903" name="noteref_903" href="#note_903"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">903</span></span></a> Although these measures
+were avowedly taken on behalf of King Henry, they
+were, in reality, so many precautions for securing the
+government in the hands of his rival the Duke of
+York.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The battle of Wakefield, 29 Dec., 1460.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The struggle which hitherto had been between
+two unequal sections of the nobility, each avowing its
+loyalty to the king, now became a struggle between
+the two rival Houses of Lancaster and York.
+Richard, Duke of York, did not live to enjoy the
+crown, his right to the reversion of which had recently
+been acknowledged by parliament. Just as the year
+was drawing to a close he met his death at Wakefield
+in the first clash with the House of Lancaster, and his
+head in mockery was set up on one of the city's
+gates from which he derived his ducal title.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-lg" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em; margin-top: 1.00em">
+<div class="tei tei-l" style="text-align: left; margin-left: 2.00em">"Off with his head, and set it on York's gates;</div>
+<div class="tei tei-l" style="text-align: left; margin-left: 4.00em">So York may overlook the town of York."</div>
+</div>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The second battle of St. Albans, 17 Feb., 1461.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">When Henry was once restored to liberty and to
+his queen, after the second battle of St. Albans
+(17 Feb., 1461), York's son, Edward, Earl of March,
+who became by his father's death heir to the crown,
+was immediately proclaimed traitor in the city.<a id="noteref_904" name="noteref_904" href="#note_904"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">904</span></span></a> The<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page305">[pg 305]</span><a name="Pg305" id="Pg305" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc170" id="toc170"></a>
+queen wished for victuals to be sent from the city to
+her forces at St. Albans, but the carts were seized
+before they left the city by a mob which refused to
+let them go in spite of the mayor's entreaties and
+threats. Margaret's army consisted for the most part
+of rude northern followers who threatened to sack
+the city if once allowed within its walls, and the
+majority of the inhabitants were unwilling to supply
+the queen with provisions until she had removed her
+half-disciplined force to a distance from London.
+With a civilized army at her back it might have been
+possible for Margaret to have gained a footing in the
+city.<a id="noteref_905" name="noteref_905" href="#note_905"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">905</span></span></a> As matters stood, she deemed it best to accede
+to the request thus made to her, and to draw off her
+army.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The Earls of March and Warwick admitted into the city, Feb., 1461.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">It was a fatal mistake, for it gave time for Edward
+and Warwick to join forces and march on London.
+The civic authorities, finding how hopeless it was to
+place further dependence upon Henry, and desiring
+above all things a stronger government than they
+could look for under the king, now surrendered the
+city to his opponents. They had not forsaken the
+king—he had forsaken them. They would no more
+of him.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-lg" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em; margin-top: 1.00em">
+<div class="tei tei-l" style="text-align: left; margin-left: 2.00em">"He that had Londyn for sake,</div>
+<div class="tei tei-l" style="text-align: left; margin-left: 4.00em"> Wolde no more to hem take."<a id="noteref_906" name="noteref_906" href="#note_906"><span class="tei tei-noteref" style="text-align: left"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">906</span></span></a></div>
+</div>
+
+<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page306">[pg 306]</span><a name="Pg306" id="Pg306" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Edward's claim to the crown recognised, 1 March, 1461.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">On the 1st March the chancellor called a general
+assembly of the citizens at Clerkenwell, and explained
+to them the title by which Edward, Duke of York,
+laid claim to the crown.<a id="noteref_907" name="noteref_907" href="#note_907"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">907</span></span></a> His title was thereupon
+acknowledged with universal applause, and on the
+4th he proceeded to Westminster Palace, accompanied
+by many of the nobility and commons of the realm,<a id="noteref_908" name="noteref_908" href="#note_908"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">908</span></span></a>
+and was there proclaimed king by the name of
+Edward IV.</p>
+</div>
+</div>
+
+<hr class="doublepage" /><div class="tei tei-div" style="margin-bottom: 5.00em; margin-top: 5.00em">
+<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page307">[pg 307]</span><a name="Pg307" id="Pg307" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+<a name="toc171" id="toc171"></a>
+<a name="pdf172" id="pdf172"></a>
+<h1 class="tei tei-head" style="text-align: left; margin-bottom: 3.46em; margin-top: 3.46em"><span style="font-size: 173%">CHAPTER XII.</span></h1>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-div" style="margin-bottom: 4.00em; margin-top: 4.00em">
+<a name="toc173" id="toc173"></a><h2 class="tei tei-head" style="text-align: left; margin-bottom: 2.88em; margin-top: 2.88em"></h2>
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The accession of King Edward IV, March, 1461.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The new king made himself very popular with
+the citizens. He was not less a favourite with them
+because he joined their ranks and became a trader
+like themselves, or because he took a wife from among
+his own subjects and made her a sharer of his crown.
+At the coronations, both of Edward and his queen,
+which took place after an interval of three years,
+the City was fully represented, and its claim
+to services at the king's coronation banquet duly
+acknowledged.<a id="noteref_909" name="noteref_909" href="#note_909"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">909</span></span></a> At the latter ceremony no less than
+four citizens, among them being Ralph Josselyn,
+the mayor, were created Knights of the Bath.<a id="noteref_910" name="noteref_910" href="#note_910"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">910</span></span></a> The
+citizens had previously shown their respect to Elizabeth
+Woodville by riding forth to meet her and escorting
+her to the Tower on her first arrival to London, and by
+presenting her with a gift of 1,000 marks or £750.<a id="noteref_911" name="noteref_911" href="#note_911"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">911</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Edward's first charter to the city, 26 Aug., 1461.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">If the young and handsome prince who now ascended
+the throne occasionally carried his familiarity
+with the wives of city burgesses beyond the limits of
+strict propriety, much could be forgotten and forgiven
+for the readiness he showed to confirm and enlarge
+the City's privileges and to foster the trade of the
+country. Before he had been on the throne many
+months he granted the citizens, by charter, the right<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page308">[pg 308]</span><a name="Pg308" id="Pg308" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+of package and scavage, as well as the office of gauger
+of wines.<a id="noteref_912" name="noteref_912" href="#note_912"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">912</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Second charter of Edward IV, 25 March, 1462.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">In the following March (1462) he confirmed the
+charter granted to the City by Henry IV, whereby the
+citizens obtained the right of taking toll and custom
+at Billingsgate, Smithfield and elsewhere, as well as
+the right of <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">tronage</span></span> or weighing wool at the Tron.<a id="noteref_913" name="noteref_913" href="#note_913"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">913</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">City Loans, 1462.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">In August, 1462 Calais was again in danger, and
+the king wanted money. The Earl of Worcester and
+others of the council were sent into the city to ask
+for a loan of £3,400. After considering the matter,
+the civic authorities agreed to lend him £1,000. The
+money was to be raised by assessment on the wards,
+but Dowgate ward being at the time very poor, was
+not to be pressed.<a id="noteref_914" name="noteref_914" href="#note_914"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">914</span></span></a> In the following October the City
+again came to the king's assistance with a further loan
+of 2,000 marks,<a id="noteref_915" name="noteref_915" href="#note_915"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">915</span></span></a> and on the 9th November the City
+obtained (in return, shall we say?) a charter confirming
+its jurisdiction over the Borough of Southwark,<a id="noteref_916" name="noteref_916" href="#note_916"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">916</span></span></a>
+originally granted by Edward III. Again, the coincidence
+of a charter granted by the king to the City,
+with a loan or gift from the City to the king, is remarkable.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The king's reception in the city on his return from the North, Feb., 1463.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">When Edward returned in February, 1463, from
+the North, where he had succeeded with the assistance
+afforded him by the Londoners in re-capturing most
+of the castles which the restless Margaret had taken,<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page309">[pg 309]</span><a name="Pg309" id="Pg309" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+the City resolved to give him a befitting reception.
+Preparations were made for the mayor, aldermen and
+commons to ride forth to meet him in their finest
+liveries, but the king having expressed his intention of
+coming from Shene to the city by water, the citizens
+went to meet him in their barges, with all the pomp
+and ceremony of a Lord Mayor's day.<a id="noteref_917" name="noteref_917" href="#note_917"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">917</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Estrangement of Warwick, 1464-1468.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Edward now gave himself up to a life of luxury
+and pleasure. In 1464 he married the young widow
+of Sir John Grey, better known by her maiden name
+of Elizabeth Woodville. His marriage to her gave
+offence to the nobility, more especially to the Earl of
+Warwick, who was planning at the time a match with
+France or Burgundy, and to whom the news of the
+marriage with one so beneath the king in point of
+dignity came as an unpleasant surprise. The earl
+was still more offended when he learnt that the young
+king had secretly effected a marriage treaty between
+his sister Margaret (whom Warwick had destined for
+one of the French princes) and the Duke of Burgundy.
+These matrimonial alliances, combined with the inordinate
+favour Edward displayed towards his wife's
+family, led to an estrangement between the king and
+his powerful subject.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Alliance between England and Burgundy, 1468.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The proposed alliance with Burgundy was far
+from being distasteful to the merchants of the city,
+inasmuch as it was likely to open up trade with those
+states of the Low Countries which the Burgundian
+dukes had consolidated as a barrier against France.
+When the Princess Margaret was about to start (June,
+1468) for her future husband's dominions, the mayor<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page310">[pg 310]</span><a name="Pg310" id="Pg310" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+and aldermen of London testified their appreciation
+of the alliance by presenting her with a pair of silver
+gilt dishes, weighing 19 lbs. 8 oz., besides the sum of
+£100 in gold, by way of a wedding gift.<a id="noteref_918" name="noteref_918" href="#note_918"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">918</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Renewal of the civil war, 1469.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Disgusted with the king's unhandsome conduct
+towards him, Warwick found an ally in Clarence, the
+king's brother, gave him one of his daughters in marriage,
+and even encouraged him to hope for the
+succession to the crown. Edward's extravagant and
+luxurious life had lost him much of his popularity.
+He had ceased, moreover, to possess the goodwill of
+the citizens for having allowed the arrest of Sir Thomas
+Cooke or Coke,<a id="noteref_919" name="noteref_919" href="#note_919"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">919</span></span></a> an alderman of the city, on a false
+charge of treason. Notwithstanding his acquittal,
+Cooke had been committed to prison and only
+regained his liberty on payment of an extortionate
+fine to the king and queen.<a id="noteref_920" name="noteref_920" href="#note_920"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">920</span></span></a> Warwick and Clarence
+made use of the general discontent that prevailed to
+further their own designs, and the civil war was
+renewed. The City endeavoured to steer a middle
+course. In June (1469) it lent the king the sum of
+£200, but in the following month it lent Warwick and
+Clarence just five times that amount on the sole
+security of some jewels of little value.<a id="noteref_921" name="noteref_921" href="#note_921"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">921</span></span></a> In May, 1470,
+when there seemed little hope of the jewels being
+redeemed, as Warwick and Clarence had been obliged
+to flee to France, the Common Council entertained
+the thought of selling them for what they were worth.<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page311">[pg 311]</span><a name="Pg311" id="Pg311" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc174" id="toc174"></a>
+The sale did not take place, however, but they were
+kept some in the "Treasury," and some in the custody
+of William Taillour, late mayor, on the express understanding
+that he was not to be held responsible in the
+event of their being stolen or taken by force.<a id="noteref_922" name="noteref_922" href="#note_922"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">922</span></span></a> In
+February, 1471, when the wheel of fortune had once
+more placed Henry VI on the throne from which
+he had been driven by Edward, and Warwick and
+Clarence were again in power, the mayor and aldermen
+caused it to be placed on record that the
+loan on the jewels had been made by agreement of
+the whole court, with the assistance of certain commoners
+who had been called in to contribute. What
+their object was in so doing is not clear. Perhaps
+they felt some qualms as to what Edward might say
+or do in respect of the loan, should he again return to
+power. They, at the same time, extended the time
+for the repayment of the loan, at the desire of the
+dukes of Clarence and Warwick. If the jewels were
+not redeemed by Whitsuntide at the latest, they were
+to be sold.<a id="noteref_923" name="noteref_923" href="#note_923"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">923</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Flight of Edward and restoration of Henry VI, Oct., 1470.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Whilst Warwick and Clarence were in France in
+1470, they concerted measures with Queen Margaret
+for effecting another revolution. By September
+matters were ready for execution. On the 13th
+Warwick landed in England; and before the end of
+the month the Kentish men so threatened the City
+and Westminster, that the newly-elected sheriffs had
+to be escorted by an armed force in order to be sworn
+in at the Exchequer, whilst a constant patrol was kept
+in the streets.<a id="noteref_924" name="noteref_924" href="#note_924"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">924</span></span></a> On the 1st October it was made
+known in the city that the king had taken flight.<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page312">[pg 312]</span><a name="Pg312" id="Pg312" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+His queen took sanctuary at Westminster, leaving the
+Tower in the hands of the mayor and aldermen and
+members of the council of Warwick and Clarence.
+The unfortunate Henry was quickly removed from
+the wretched cell in which he had so long been confined
+to a commodious and handsomely furnished
+apartment which the queen herself, being <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">enceinte</span></span> at
+the time, purposed occupying when she should be
+brought to bed. A garrison was placed in the Tower
+by order of the Common Council, sitting, for safety's
+sake, in the church of St. Stephen, Walbrook. On the
+5th October Archbishop Nevill, Warwick's brother,
+entered the city with a strong force and relieved the
+civic authorities of the custody of the Tower, and on
+the following day Warwick himself appeared, accompanied
+by Clarence and a large following, and removed
+Henry from the Tower to the Bishop of London's
+palace.<a id="noteref_925" name="noteref_925" href="#note_925"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">925</span></span></a> Two days later (9 Oct.) he obtained from
+the Common Council the sum of £1,000 for the
+defence of his stronghold, Calais, besides a loan of
+£100 from the aldermen of the city for his own
+private use.<a id="noteref_926" name="noteref_926" href="#note_926"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">926</span></span></a> On the 18th the Earl of Worcester,
+Edward's constable and minister of his cruelties,<a id="noteref_927" name="noteref_927" href="#note_927"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">927</span></span></a> was
+beheaded on Tower Hill, the ground being kept by
+the Sheriffs of London and a contingent from the
+several wards.<a id="noteref_928" name="noteref_928" href="#note_928"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">928</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Sir Thomas Cooke or Coke, late alderman.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">In November Henry was made to hold a parliament,
+and Sir Thomas Cooke, the deposed alderman,<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page313">[pg 313]</span><a name="Pg313" id="Pg313" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc175" id="toc175"></a>
+lost no time in presenting a bill for the restoration of
+his lands, which had been seized by the queen's father,
+Lord Rivers. He would probably have been successful
+had fortune continued to favour King Henry, for,
+besides being a member of parliament, he was, writes
+Fabyan (a brother alderman), "a man of great boldnesse
+in speche, and well spoken and syngulerly
+wytted and well reasoned."<a id="noteref_929" name="noteref_929" href="#note_929"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">929</span></span></a> John Stokton had
+recently been elected mayor, but there is reason for
+believing that he, like other aldermen, preferred
+Edward on the throne, licentious and extravagant
+as he was, to an imbecile like Henry. He fell ill,
+or, as Fabyan puts it, feigned sickness and took
+to his bed, and Cooke assumed the duties of the
+mayoralty. At Edward's restoration Cooke had to
+seek refuge in France, but he was taken at sea before
+he could reach the continent. The same fate might
+have awaited Stokton had he shown himself less
+cautious at that critical time.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Edward recovers the throne, April, 1471.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">That the aldermen and the better class of citizens
+favoured Edward, is shown by the ease with which
+he effected an entry into the city when he returned
+to England in the spring of the following year (1471).
+The gates, we are told, were opened to him by
+Urswyk, the Recorder, and certain aldermen (their
+names are not mentioned), who took advantage of
+the inhabitants being at dinner to let in Edward.<a id="noteref_930" name="noteref_930" href="#note_930"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">930</span></span></a>
+Two days later, having recruited his forces, Edward<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page314">[pg 314]</span><a name="Pg314" id="Pg314" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+marched out of the city, with Henry in his train, to
+meet Warwick. He encountered him on Easter Day
+(14 April) at Barnet, and totally defeated him, both
+the earl and his brother being left dead on the field.
+By this time Margaret had landed with a fresh army;
+but a crushing defeat inflicted upon her at Tewkesbury
+(4 May) left Edward once more master of the
+kingdom.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The Kentish rising under "bastard" Fauconberg, May, 1471.</span></div></div>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Attack made on the City.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">For a short time the city lay in some peril whilst
+Edward was engaged with Warwick and Margaret.
+The men of Kent again became troublesome. They
+affected not to believe that Warwick had actually
+fallen at Barnet. Under the leadership of Thomas
+Fauconberg or Falconbridge, generally spoken of as
+the "bastard," being a natural son of William Nevill,
+first Lord Fauconberg, Earl of Kent, they marched to
+London, with the intention of releasing Henry from
+confinement and placing him again on the throne.
+Fauconberg, who had been made a freeman of the
+City in 1454,<a id="noteref_931" name="noteref_931" href="#note_931"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">931</span></span></a> assumed the title of captain of King
+Henry's people in Kent, and on the 8th May wrote
+from Sittingbourne to inform the inhabitants of the
+city that he had undertaken the cause of Henry
+against the "usurper" Edward, and to ask to be
+allowed to pass through the city with his followers,
+whom he promised to hold in restraint and prevent
+doing any mischief. He had written to the mayor
+and aldermen to the same effect, and had desired to
+have a reply sent to him at Blackheath by a certain
+day and hour. To this letter the mayor and aldermen
+sent an answer on the following day, to the effect
+that when Edward left the city, after the battle of<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page315">[pg 315]</span><a name="Pg315" id="Pg315" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc176" id="toc176"></a>
+Barnet, to follow the movements of Margaret and
+endeavour to bring about an action before she could
+completely rally her forces, he had charged them on
+their allegiance to hold the city of London for him,
+and for none other. For that reason they dared not,
+neither would they, suffer him to pass through the
+city. They hesitated to accept his assurance as to
+the peaceable behaviour of his followers, judging from
+past experience. As for the statement he had caused
+to be published, that he held a commission as captain
+of the Navy of England and men of war by sea and
+land under the Earl of Warwick, whom he still supposed
+to be alive, they assured him that the earl was
+dead, and that his corpse, as well as the corpse of
+Montague, the earl's brother, had been exposed to
+view for two days in St. Paul's. They gave him the
+names of some of the chief men who had fallen at
+Tewkesbury, obtained, they assured him, not from
+hearsay but from eye-witnesses—special war correspondents,
+whom the City had despatched for the
+express purpose of reporting on the state of the field,
+and they concluded by exhorting him to do as they
+themselves had done, and to acknowledge Edward IV
+as the rightful king. They would even plead for royal
+favour on his behalf, but as to letting him and his host
+pass through the city, that was out of the question.<a id="noteref_932" name="noteref_932" href="#note_932"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">932</span></span></a>
+Having despatched this answer to Fauconberg, the
+civic fathers at once set to work to fortify the river's
+bank from Castle Baynard to the Tower, where lay
+the rebels' fleet. On Sunday, the 12th May, the
+Kentish men tried to force London Bridge and set<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page316">[pg 316]</span><a name="Pg316" id="Pg316" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+fire to some beer-houses near Saint Katherine's
+Hospital. The attack was renewed on the following
+Tuesday, whilst portions of the rebel force, amounting
+it was said to 5,000 persons, were told off to try and
+force the gates of Aldgate and Bishopsgate. There,
+however, they were repulsed, and nearly 300 of them
+met their death, either in actual fight or in their
+endeavours to get on board their boats at Blackwall.
+Urswyk, the city's Recorder, as well as Robert Basset,
+alderman of Aldgate Ward, showed conspicuous valour
+in the fight which took place in that quarter.<a id="noteref_933" name="noteref_933" href="#note_933"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">933</span></span></a> The
+city was never again troubled by Fauconberg. After
+much wandering he was taken prisoner at Southampton,
+and thence conveyed to Middleham, in Yorkshire,
+where he was beheaded. His head was afterwards
+sent to London and set up on London Bridge, "looking
+into Kentward."<a id="noteref_934" name="noteref_934" href="#note_934"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">934</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Edward's return to London, and death of Henry VI, May, 1471.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">On the night after Edward's return<a id="noteref_935" name="noteref_935" href="#note_935"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">935</span></span></a> in triumph
+to London, Henry VI ended his life in the Tower,
+murdered, in all probability, at the instance of the
+Duke of Gloucester, the king's brother, afterwards
+King Richard III. His remains lay in state at St.
+Paul's and at the Blackfriars a short while, and were
+then carried to Chertsey to be buried.<a id="noteref_936" name="noteref_936" href="#note_936"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">936</span></span></a> Edward distributed
+honours among his supporters in the city with
+a lavish hand. Not only did the Lord Mayor—the
+cautious Stokton—receive the honour of knighthood,<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page317">[pg 317]</span><a name="Pg317" id="Pg317" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc177" id="toc177"></a>
+but the aldermen<a id="noteref_937" name="noteref_937" href="#note_937"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">937</span></span></a> besides, whilst the city's doughty
+Recorder was soon afterwards raised to be Baron of
+the Exchequer. The City was so pleased with its
+Recorder that it voted him a pipe of wine annually,
+but the gift was not to be drawn into precedent.<a id="noteref_938" name="noteref_938" href="#note_938"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">938</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Birth of Edward V.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The rest of Edward's reign was undisturbed by
+any attempt to unseat the new dynasty, and his position
+was rendered the more secure by the birth of
+a son (afterwards Edward V) in the sanctuary of Westminster,
+whither his wife Elizabeth had fled for refuge.
+Before the young Prince of Wales was five years old
+he received the honour of knighthood at Westminster.
+The mayor and aldermen went to meet him on his
+way from the city to Westminster on that occasion,
+clad in scarlet robes, whilst the streets from Bishopsgate
+to Saint Paul's were thronged with the commons in
+their livery.<a id="noteref_939" name="noteref_939" href="#note_939"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">939</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The invasion of France, 1475.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Edward was now free to carry out his foreign
+policy. Parliament voted supplies to enable him to
+make war with France, but these were not sufficient,
+and he had recourse to a system of "benevolences"
+or free gifts, which few, however, dared to refuse. On
+the 30th May, 1475, he left the Bishop of London's
+palace in St. Paul's Church-yard, and, passing through
+Cheapside to London Bridge, took boat to Greenwich
+for the purpose of crossing over to France. The
+livery companies turned out to do him honour.<a id="noteref_940" name="noteref_940" href="#note_940"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">940</span></span></a> The
+expedition ended without a blow, Edward allowing<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page318">[pg 318]</span><a name="Pg318" id="Pg318" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+himself to be bought off with a sum of 75,000 crowns
+paid down and a pension of 50,000 more. On his
+return he was met at Blackheath by the mayor
+and aldermen in scarlet gowns, with their servants in
+gowns of "musterdevilers," accompanied by more than
+600 members of the companies in gowns of bright
+murrey.<a id="noteref_941" name="noteref_941" href="#note_941"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">941</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Edward and the citizens.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">By resorting again to benevolences and exacting
+money from the City in return for charters, Edward
+avoided the necessity of summoning parliament between
+the years 1478 and 1483. On the 25th May,
+1481, the king granted the City a general pardon,<a id="noteref_942" name="noteref_942" href="#note_942"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">942</span></span></a> and
+in the following month the City returned the compliment
+by a loan of 5,000 marks.<a id="noteref_943" name="noteref_943" href="#note_943"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">943</span></span></a> This loan was not
+only repaid, but the king in the next year extended
+his hospitality to the City by giving a large number of
+citizens a day's hunting in Waltham forest, and afterwards
+regaling them and their wives with venison and
+wine.<a id="noteref_944" name="noteref_944" href="#note_944"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">944</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">A famine threatened, 1482.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The close of the year 1482 witnessed such a
+dearth of cereals that the exportation of wheat or
+other grain was absolutely forbidden. It was feared
+that a famine might arise in the City of London, so
+vast had its population become, both from the influx
+of nobles who had taken up their quarters within its
+walls as well as of strangers from foreign lands.
+Merchants were therefore encouraged to send their
+grain to London by a promise that it should not be
+intercepted by the king's purveyors.<a id="noteref_945" name="noteref_945" href="#note_945"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">945</span></span></a></p>
+
+<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page319">[pg 319]</span><a name="Pg319" id="Pg319" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc178" id="toc178"></a>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Edward's last parliament, 1483.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The names of the City's representatives who
+attended the parliament which met in January, 1483,
+are not recorded, but we have the names of four
+aldermen and five commoners, who were appointed
+in the previous month of December to confer with
+the City members on matters affecting the City.<a id="noteref_946" name="noteref_946" href="#note_946"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">946</span></span></a> In
+addition to parliamentary grants of a fifteenth and
+tenth, and a renewal of the tax on aliens, the
+citizens agreed to lend the king the sum of £2,000,
+each alderman to lay down 50 marks and 80 commoners
+to subscribe £15 a piece.<a id="noteref_947" name="noteref_947" href="#note_947"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">947</span></span></a> Some difficulty
+was experienced in raising the money, and the names
+of eleven persons who had refused to contribute were
+forwarded to the king.<a id="noteref_948" name="noteref_948" href="#note_948"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">948</span></span></a> A little more than a month
+elapsed and Edward was dead.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Preparations for the coronation of Edward V.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The coronation of the young prince who now
+succeeded to his father's throne, only to occupy it however
+for a few weeks, was fixed to take place on the first
+Sunday in May; and on the 19th April the City was
+busy making arrangements for the prince's reception.
+It was decided that the mayor and aldermen should
+ride forth to meet the king, clad in gowns of scarlet,
+their attendants being provided with gowns of the
+colour of lion's-foot (<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">pied de lyon</span></span>), at the public cost.
+Five sergeants-at-mace belonging to the mayor, and
+nineteen sergeants-at-mace in the service of the
+sheriffs, were also to ride out to meet the king, clad
+in gowns of the last-mentioned colour. The sword-bearer
+was to be provided with a gown of murrey, and
+a deputation from the civic guilds, to the number of
+410 persons, clad in gowns of the same colour, was to
+join the cavalcade.<a id="noteref_949" name="noteref_949" href="#note_949"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">949</span></span></a> On the 14th May they rode out<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page320">[pg 320]</span><a name="Pg320" id="Pg320" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+to Hornsey, where they met the prince and his uncle,
+the Duke of Gloucester, and escorted them to the
+city. The duke was the same day appointed Protector,
+to the great disappointment of the queen, who again
+took sanctuary at Westminster. She was induced
+shortly afterwards to give up possession of her younger
+son, the Duke of York, and he and Prince Edward
+were lodged in the Tower by order of Gloucester, who
+took up his quarters at Crosby Palace, the mansion
+house of Sir John Crosby, in Bishopsgate Street.</p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Although preparations had been made for the
+coronation, and the City had appointed representatives
+from the livery companies to assist the chief butler at
+the banquet<a id="noteref_950" name="noteref_950" href="#note_950"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">950</span></span></a> according to custom, that ceremony
+never took place. Gloucester feared that if once the
+young king was crowned, the project which he had
+already begun to entertain of transferring the crown
+to his own head would be less capable of realization.
+Although he took an oath of allegiance to the new
+king,<a id="noteref_951" name="noteref_951" href="#note_951"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">951</span></span></a> it was not long before he determined to feel the
+pulse of the citizens as to their feelings towards himself
+as a claimant of the crown.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Shaw's sermon at Paul's Cross, Sunday, 22 June, 1483.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">In order to do this he called to his assistance
+Dr. Shaw, an eminent preacher, whose brother, Sir
+Edmund Shaa, or Shaw, happened to be mayor at the
+time. Acting upon instructions from Gloucester,
+Shaw preached a sermon at Paul's Cross on Sunday,
+the 22nd June (1483), in which he charged the late
+king with bigamy, Edward IV having, as he declared,<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page321">[pg 321]</span><a name="Pg321" id="Pg321" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc179" id="toc179"></a>
+made a contract of marriage with one of his mistresses
+before he married Elizabeth Woodville, and this being
+the case the late king's children by her were illegitimate,
+and Gloucester was the rightful heir to the
+throne. It was arranged that at this point in his
+discourse Gloucester himself should appear on the
+scene, coming up, as if by chance, from his lodgings
+at Castle Baynard. By some mischance the duke
+failed to appear at the proper moment, and the effect
+was lost. The citizens sat stolidly silent, not a single
+cry being raised in favour of Gloucester.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The Duke of Buckingham at the Guildhall, 24 June, 1483.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Nothing daunted by this dismal failure, Gloucester
+made another and more successful attempt to win over
+the citizens. On the following Tuesday (24 June) he
+sent the Duke of Buckingham to harangue the citizens
+at the Guildhall. The duke began by reminding his
+hearers of the danger to which their wives and
+daughters had been exposed under the late king; of
+the undue influence exercised at court by Jane Shore,<a id="noteref_952" name="noteref_952" href="#note_952"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">952</span></span></a>
+one only of a number of respectable women whom
+Edward, he said, had seduced; of the excessive taxes
+and illegal extortions by way of "benevolences" they
+had recently suffered, and of the cruel treatment of
+their own alderman, Cooke. He then went on to
+repeat the remarks of Dr. Shaw touching the illegitimacy
+of the princes, and spoke of the dangers of<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page322">[pg 322]</span><a name="Pg322" id="Pg322" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+having a boy king on the throne, concluding by saying
+that although it were doubtful if Gloucester would
+accept the crown if asked, he would certainly be
+greatly influenced by any request proceeding from
+the "worshipful citizens of the metropolis of the
+kingdom."<a id="noteref_953" name="noteref_953" href="#note_953"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">953</span></span></a> Buckingham's eloquence was lost on the
+citizens, who were as little influenced by what their
+new Recorder, Thomas Fitz-William, had to say on
+the matter. At length the duke lost patience and
+plainly told them that the matter lay entirely with
+the lords and commons, and that the assent of the
+citizens, however desirable in itself, was not a necessity.
+By this time the back of the hall was packed
+with Gloucester's partisans, so that when Buckingham
+put the question pointedly to the assembly—would
+they have the Protector assume the crown?—a
+cry of assent arose from this quarter and was taken up
+by a few lads and apprentices. This was enough; the
+voice of the few was accepted as the voice of the
+many, and the citizens were bidden to attend on the
+morrow to petition Gloucester to accept the crown.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The deposition of Edward V, 26 June, 1483.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Accordingly, on the morrow, a deputation from
+the city waited on the Duke of Gloucester at Baynard's
+Castle and invited him to accept the crown.
+After a considerable show of affected reluctance,
+Richard assented, and, having assented, lost no time
+in carrying out his pre-conceived purpose. The very
+next day he hastened to Westminster and, seating
+himself on the throne, declared himself king by inheritance
+and election.</p>
+
+<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page323">[pg 323]</span><a name="Pg323" id="Pg323" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc180" id="toc180"></a>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The coronation of Richard III, 6 July, 1433.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">On the 6th July the last Angevin king that
+reigned over England was crowned—crowned with
+his wife Anne, widow of Prince Edward, killed at
+Tewkesbury, but after the battle not in it, and of
+whose blood Richard himself is thought to have been
+guilty. The City accepted the position and made
+the new king and queen a present of £1,000; two-thirds
+for the king and the remainder for the queen.
+The money was raised in the city by way of a
+fifteenth; the poor were not to be called upon to contribute,
+and the gift was not to form a precedent.<a id="noteref_954" name="noteref_954" href="#note_954"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">954</span></span></a>
+The claim of the mayor and citizens to assist the
+chief butler at the coronation banquet was made and
+allowed,<a id="noteref_955" name="noteref_955" href="#note_955"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">955</span></span></a> the king, sitting crowned in <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">le Whitehawle</span></span>,
+presented to the mayor and aldermen who were present
+on that occasion a gold cup set with pearls and
+precious stones, to be used by the commonalty at
+public entertainments in the Guildhall.<a id="noteref_956" name="noteref_956" href="#note_956"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">956</span></span></a> Concerning
+this cup there is the following curious entry made in
+the City's Records, under date 13th July, 1486, when
+Hugh Brice was mayor:—<a id="noteref_957" name="noteref_957" href="#note_957"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">957</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="block tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.80em; margin-left: 3.60em; margin-top: 1.80em; margin-right: 3.60em"><span style="font-size: 90%">"Item it is aggreed this day by the Court that
+where Hugh Brice Mair of this Citie, hathe in his
+Kepyng a Cuppe of gold, garneised with perle and
+precious stone of the gifte of Richard, late in dede
+and not of right, Kyng of Englond, which gifte was
+to thuse of the Cominaltie of the said Citee, that if
+the saide Cuppe be stolen or taken away by thevys</span><span class="tei tei-pb" id="page324">[pg 324]</span><a name="Pg324" id="Pg324" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><span style="font-size: 90%">
+oute of his possession, or elles by the casualtie of
+Fire hereafter it shall hapne the same Cuppe to be
+brent or lost, that the same Hugh Brice hereafter
+shall not be hurt or impeched therfore."</span></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">This extract is interesting as showing that the
+coronation cup presented to the mayor of the City
+by way of <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">honorarium</span></span> was, at this period at least,
+looked upon as a gift made to the City's use, and
+that the mayor could not claim it as his own perquisite,
+as mayors had been in the habit of doing in
+days gone by, and as they continued to do afterwards.
+William Estfeld, who, as mayor, attended the coronation
+of Henry VI (6 Nov., 1429), and received the
+customary gold cup and ewer, appropriated the gift
+to his own use, and, as we have already mentioned,
+bequeathed them to his grandson.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Rebellion of the Duke of Buckingham, 1483.</span></div></div>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">His execution, 2 Nov.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Richard had scarcely been seated three months
+on the throne before the Duke of Buckingham, who
+had been rewarded for his late services by being
+appointed lord high constable, was in open rebellion,
+and Henry, Earl of Richmond, long an exile in France,
+was meditating an invasion. Buckingham's conspiracy
+proved a failure, and he paid for his rashness with his
+head. The Earl of Richmond was detained in France
+by stress of weather, and danger from that quarter
+was averted at least for a time.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The king's reception in the city, Nov., 1483.</span></div></div>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Bold speech of the Londoners.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">On Richard's return to London after putting
+down his enemies, he was welcomed by over 400
+members of the various civic companies, who rode
+out to meet him in gowns of murrey.<a id="noteref_958" name="noteref_958" href="#note_958"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">958</span></span></a> His policy
+was one of conciliation, and he lent a ready ear to a<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page325">[pg 325]</span><a name="Pg325" id="Pg325" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc181" id="toc181"></a>
+Petition which the citizens presented to him setting
+forth the wrongs which they had suffered: "We be
+determined" said the citizens in forcible language,
+"rather to adventure and to commit us to the peril
+of our lives and jeopardy of death, than to live in
+such thraldom and bondage as we have lived some
+time heretofore, oppressed and injured by extortions
+and new impositions against the laws of God and
+man, and the liberty and laws of this realm wherein
+every Englishman is inherited."<a id="noteref_959" name="noteref_959" href="#note_959"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">959</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Richard's Parliament, Jan., 1484.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Richard met this appeal by summoning parliament
+to meet in January (1484), when various acts
+were passed affecting the trade and commerce of the
+city and the country, and among them one which
+forbade aliens keeping any foreign apprentices or
+workpeople to assist them in their occupation, and
+otherwise imposed great restrictions upon the merchant
+stranger.<a id="noteref_960" name="noteref_960" href="#note_960"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">960</span></span></a> This statute was scarcely less welcome
+to the citizens of London than that which
+declared the practice of exacting money under the
+guise of benevolences to be unconstitutional.<a id="noteref_961" name="noteref_961" href="#note_961"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">961</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Expected invasion of Henry of Richmond, 1484.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">In the summer he was welcomed wherever he
+went, yet he knew that danger threatened. Richmond
+was preparing for an invasion and the nobles were not
+to be trusted. The citizens, too, were aware of the
+danger, and had in the early part of the year appointed
+a joint committee of aldermen and commoners to survey
+the city's ordnance, and to supply guns and gunpowder
+in place of that which had recently been
+destroyed by a fire.<a id="noteref_962" name="noteref_962" href="#note_962"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">962</span></span></a> In August they had promised<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page326">[pg 326]</span><a name="Pg326" id="Pg326" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+Richard a loan of £2,400, each alderman contributing
+£100;<a id="noteref_963" name="noteref_963" href="#note_963"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">963</span></span></a> and in the following November the mayor
+and aldermen rode out to Kennington to meet him
+and escort him to the Wardrobe, near Blackfriars.<a id="noteref_964" name="noteref_964" href="#note_964"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">964</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Richard defeated and slain at Bosworth, 22 Aug., 1485.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Matters became more serious as time went on.
+In June, 1485, the City advanced another sum of
+£2,000 to assist Richard against the "rebels," who
+were daily expected to land in England.<a id="noteref_965" name="noteref_965" href="#note_965"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">965</span></span></a> Extraordinary
+precautions were taken to guard the city.<a id="noteref_966" name="noteref_966" href="#note_966"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">966</span></span></a> At
+last the blow fell. On the 7th August Henry landed
+at Milford Haven, and on the 22nd the battle of
+Bosworth was fought and Richard killed.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Henry VII escorted to the city.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">From Bosworth field Henry set out for London.
+He was met at Shoreditch by a deputation from the
+City, accompanied by the Recorder, and was presented
+with a gift of 1,000 marks.<a id="noteref_967" name="noteref_967" href="#note_967"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">967</span></span></a> The standards taken on
+the field of battle were deposited with much pomp
+and ceremony in St. Paul's Church, where a <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Te Deum</span></span>
+was sung, and for a few days Henry took up his residence
+in the bishop's palace in St. Paul's Churchyard.<a id="noteref_968" name="noteref_968" href="#note_968"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">968</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The sweating sickness, Sept.-Oct., 1485.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">A cloud soon overshadowed the rejoicings which
+followed Henry's accession. An epidemic hitherto unknown
+in England, although visitations of it followed
+at intervals during this and the succeeding reign, made
+its appearance in the city towards the close of September.
+The "sweating sickness," as this deadly<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page327">[pg 327]</span><a name="Pg327" id="Pg327" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+pestilence was called, carried off two mayors and six
+aldermen within the space of a week<a id="noteref_969" name="noteref_969" href="#note_969"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">969</span></span></a>—so sudden and
+fatal was its attack. Sir Thomas Hille, who was
+mayor at the time of its first appearance, fell a victim
+to it on the 23rd September, and was succeeded by
+William Stocker, appointed on the following day.<a id="noteref_970" name="noteref_970" href="#note_970"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">970</span></span></a>
+Within four days Stocker himself was dead. There
+remained little more than a month before the regular
+day of election of a mayor (28 Oct.)<a id="noteref_971" name="noteref_971" href="#note_971"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">971</span></span></a> for the year
+ensuing, and John Warde was called upon to take office
+during the interval.<a id="noteref_972" name="noteref_972" href="#note_972"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">972</span></span></a> He appears to have entertained
+but little affection for the city, and the civic authorities
+had some difficulty in getting him to reside in London,<a id="noteref_973" name="noteref_973" href="#note_973"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">973</span></span></a>
+where his duties required his presence. When the
+mayoralty year expired he was not put in nomination
+for re-election. He probably went back into
+the country, glad to get away from the pestilential
+city, and Hugh Brice was elected in his stead.<a id="noteref_974" name="noteref_974" href="#note_974"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">974</span></span></a>
+Fortunately for the city, the epidemic departed as
+suddenly and unexpectedly as it came. By the end
+of October it had entirely disappeared, and allowed
+of Henry's coronation taking place on the 30th of
+that month.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">A City loan of £2,000.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Within a fortnight of his arrival in London
+Henry issued a writ of summons for his first parliament.
+It was not so much for the purpose of obtaining
+supplies that he was anxious that parliament should
+meet at the earliest opportunity; he was desirous of<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page328">[pg 328]</span><a name="Pg328" id="Pg328" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+obtaining as soon as possible a parliamentary title to
+the crown. As for his immediate necessities, he preferred
+to apply to the City. He asked for a loan of
+6,000 marks, or £4,000; but the citizens would not
+advance more than half that sum. The loan was repaid
+the following year—"every penie to the good
+contentation and satisfying of them that disbursed it."<a id="noteref_975" name="noteref_975" href="#note_975"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">975</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Henry's marriage with Elizabeth of York, Jan., 1486.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">In January, 1486, Henry married the Princess
+Elizabeth, daughter of Edward IV, and heiress of the
+Yorkist family. He had previously taken the precaution
+of committing to the Tower the Earl of
+Warwick, son of Clarence, for fear lest he might set
+up a title to the crown.<a id="noteref_976" name="noteref_976" href="#note_976"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">976</span></span></a> After his marriage he set
+out on a progress through the country, and on his
+return to London, in June, was met by the mayor and
+citizens at Putney, and escorted by them down the
+river to Westminster.<a id="noteref_977" name="noteref_977" href="#note_977"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">977</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The insurrection of Lambert Simnel, 1487.</span></div></div>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">City gifts to the king, June and July, 1487.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">A rumour that the Earl of Warwick had escaped
+from the Tower gave an opportunity for an imposter,
+Lambert Simnel, to personate the earl. In order to
+satisfy the Londoners that the rumour of Warwick's
+escape was a fabrication, Henry caused his prisoner to be
+paraded through the streets of the city, and exposed to
+public view at St. Paul's. After Simnel's defeat (16 June,
+1487), the Common Council agreed (28 June) to send
+a deputation, consisting of two aldermen, the recorder,
+and four commoners, with a suite of 24 men, to meet<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page329">[pg 329]</span><a name="Pg329" id="Pg329" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc182" id="toc182"></a>
+the king at Kenilworth, and at the same time voted
+the king a present of £1000.<a id="noteref_978" name="noteref_978" href="#note_978"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">978</span></span></a> This gift was quickly
+followed (11 July) by the grant of another loan of
+£2,000 to be levied on the civic companies as before.<a id="noteref_979" name="noteref_979" href="#note_979"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">979</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The king escorted to London, Oct., 1487.</span></div></div>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The City's gift to the queen at her coronation, 25 Nov., 1487.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">In October Henry was expected in London,<a id="noteref_980" name="noteref_980" href="#note_980"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">980</span></span></a> and
+the Common Council again showed their loyalty by
+agreeing that the mayor and aldermen should ride
+forth to meet his highness, clad in cloaks of scarlet,
+and accompanied by a suite of servants clothed in
+medley, at the cost of the "Chamber." With them
+also rode a contingent from the various civic guilds,
+clothed in violet, and numbering over 400 horsemen.
+The Mercers, the Grocers, the Drapers, the Fishmongers,
+and the "Taillours," each sent 30 mounted
+representatives of their guild; the Goldsmiths sent 24,
+whilst the rest sent contingents varying from one to
+twenty.<a id="noteref_981" name="noteref_981" href="#note_981"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">981</span></span></a> On the occasion of the queen's coronation,
+which took place the following month (25 Nov.), she
+was made the recipient of a gift of 1,000 marks by
+the City.<a id="noteref_982" name="noteref_982" href="#note_982"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">982</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Henry VII and Brittany, 1488-1492.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The king would willingly have remained at peace
+if he were allowed, from motives of economy if for no
+other reason. England, however, could not sit still
+and see Brittany overwhelmed by the French king.
+Before assistance could be sent to the Duchess Anne,
+it was imperative that money should be raised. At
+the close of 1488 the Common Council voted the king
+a loan of £4,000. The money was ordered to be
+raised by assessment on the companies, but the practice
+was not to be drawn into precedent. The king,<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page330">[pg 330]</span><a name="Pg330" id="Pg330" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+like a good paymaster as he always was, whatever
+other defects he may have had, repaid the money in
+the following year.<a id="noteref_983" name="noteref_983" href="#note_983"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">983</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Parliamentary supplies and City loans.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Early in the following year parliament<a id="noteref_984" name="noteref_984" href="#note_984"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">984</span></span></a> granted
+large supplies which enabled Henry to despatch 6,000
+Englishmen to Anne's assistance, but which caused
+much discontent among the "rude and beastlie"
+people of Yorkshire and Durham.<a id="noteref_985" name="noteref_985" href="#note_985"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">985</span></span></a> In June, 1491,
+another loan of £3,000 was raised, this time by assessment
+on the wards;<a id="noteref_986" name="noteref_986" href="#note_986"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">986</span></span></a> and in October Henry declared
+to parliament his intention of invading France in
+person. A grant of two fifteenths and two tenths was
+immediately made to assist him in his expedition by
+parliament; whilst the City contributed a "great benevolence,"
+the fellowship of Drapers contributing
+more than any other fellowship, and every alderman
+subscribing, whether he wished it or no, the sum of
+£200. The amount contributed by the commonalty
+exceeded £9,000.<a id="noteref_987" name="noteref_987" href="#note_987"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">987</span></span></a> Thus furnished with supplies, the
+king crossed over to Calais on the 6th October, 1492.
+The campaign, however, had scarcely opened before
+Henry gladly accepted the liberal terms offered him
+by the French king, and peace was signed at Etaples
+(3 Nov.).</p>
+
+<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page331">[pg 331]</span><a name="Pg331" id="Pg331" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc183" id="toc183"></a>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Perkin Warbeck conspiracy, 1496-1497.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The success which, brief as it was, had attended
+Simnel's enterprise was sufficient to encourage a hope
+that a better planned project might end in overturning
+the throne. A report was accordingly blazed abroad
+that Richard, Duke of York, brother of King Edward V,
+was yet alive, not having been murdered in the Tower,
+as had been supposed; and a man called Perkin Warbeck
+or Warboys, a native of Tournay, assumed the
+name of Richard Plantagenet and succeeded in getting
+a large number of people in Ireland and Scotland to
+believe that in his person they in fact saw Richard,
+Duke of York, the rightful heir to the crown.
+James IV of Scotland not only gave him in marriage
+the lady Catherine Gordon, daughter of the Earl of
+Huntley, but led an army into England in hopes that
+the appearance of the pretended prince might raise
+an insurrection in the northern counties. Instead,
+however, of joining the invaders the English prepared
+to repel them, and James retreated into his own
+country. This took place in 1496. Parliament granted
+large supplies to enable the king to meet the danger,
+but the inhabitants of Cornwall, sick of the constant
+demands made of them for money, and aware of the
+large treasure which Henry had already amassed,
+openly resisted any attempt at further taxation and
+determined to march on London.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The city put into a state of defence.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The Londoners, who not only abstained from
+opposing the new demand for money, but volunteered
+a loan to the king (15 Nov.) of £4,000,<a id="noteref_988" name="noteref_988" href="#note_988"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">988</span></span></a> lost no time
+in putting their city into a state of defence. Six<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page332">[pg 332]</span><a name="Pg332" id="Pg332" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+aldermen and a number of representatives from the
+livery companies were deputed to attend to the city's
+ordnance.<a id="noteref_989" name="noteref_989" href="#note_989"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">989</span></span></a> The mayor was to be allowed twelve
+armed men in addition to his usual suite, and the
+sheriffs forty sergeants and forty valets in order to
+assist them in keeping the peace within the city.
+Communication was to be kept up at least once in
+the day between the mayor and the Lord Chancellor.
+Houses which had been set up on the city's walls, or
+within sixteen feet of them, were to be abated. John
+Stokker, who filled the not unworthy office of Common
+Hunt,<a id="noteref_990" name="noteref_990" href="#note_990"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">990</span></span></a> was ordered daily to ride out to learn the
+king's pleasure and report thereon to the mayor and
+aldermen. Among those appointed to guard the city's
+gates and Temple Bar was Alderman Fabyan, the
+chronicler.<a id="noteref_991" name="noteref_991" href="#note_991"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">991</span></span></a> The state of anxiety which prevailed in
+the city at this crisis is illustrated by "Jesus Mercy"
+at the head of one side of the page of the City's record,
+on which the above orders are entered, whilst on the
+other side are the words <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">vigilie temporis turbacionis</span></span>.<a id="noteref_992" name="noteref_992" href="#note_992"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">992</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The rebels defeated at Blackheath, 22 June, 1497.</span></div></div>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Perkin Warbeck in Cornwall.</span></div></div>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Surrenders to the king's forces and is brought prisoner to London, Oct., 1498.</span></div></div>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Is executed at Tyburn, 1499.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">By the 22nd June, 1497, all immediate danger had
+passed, the rebels being on that day utterly defeated
+at Blackheath. Their leaders were taken and executed;
+the rest were for the most part made prisoners, but were
+soon afterwards dismissed without further punishment.
+The leniency displayed towards them by Henry was<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page333">[pg 333]</span><a name="Pg333" id="Pg333" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc184" id="toc184"></a>
+ill-repaid by their afterwards flocking to the standard
+of the <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">soi-disant</span></span> Richard IV, King of England, who
+availed himself of their mutinous disposition and
+appeared in their midst at Bodmin. The news of
+Perkin Warbeck having arrived in Cornwall from
+Ireland was brought to the mayor and aldermen of
+the City of London by letter from the king, which was
+read to the Common Council on Saturday, the 16th
+September.<a id="noteref_993" name="noteref_993" href="#note_993"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">993</span></span></a> The rebels made an unsuccesful attempt
+to get possession of Exeter, but hearing of the approach
+of the king's forces, Perkin Warbeck withdrew to
+Taunton, leaving his followers to take care of themselves.
+From Taunton he went to "Mynet" (Minehead)
+accompanied by less than sixty adherents,<a id="noteref_994" name="noteref_994" href="#note_994"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">994</span></span></a> and
+by the 12th October the king was able to inform
+the Mayor that Peter "Warboys" had voluntarily
+submitted himself and had confessed to his being
+a native of Tournay.<a id="noteref_995" name="noteref_995" href="#note_995"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">995</span></span></a> The king had him conveyed
+to London and paraded through the streets
+on horseback, in a species of mock triumph, and
+caused his confession to be printed and scattered over
+the country that people might see the real character
+of the man. For a time he appears to have been
+detained in lax custody about the court, but after he
+had made an attempt to escape and reach the sea-coast,
+and been re-captured, he was sent to the Tower.
+There he got into communication with the unfortunate
+Earl of Warwick, and entered into a plot for effecting
+his own and the earl's liberty. A charge was formulated
+against the earl on the most trivial grounds, of a
+conspiracy to seize the Tower, and Warbeck was
+indicted as an accomplice. The former, being found<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page334">[pg 334]</span><a name="Pg334" id="Pg334" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+guilty by his peers, was beheaded on Tower Hill,
+while Perkin and three of his accomplices were hanged
+at Tyburn.<a id="noteref_996" name="noteref_996" href="#note_996"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">996</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Visit of Henry VIII as a boy to the city, 30 Oct., 1498.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">In the meantime Prince Henry, who afterwards
+succeeded his father on the throne as King Henry VIII,
+but was at the time a child of seven years, paid a visit
+to the city (30 Oct., 1498), where he received a hearty
+welcome and was presented by the Recorder, on behalf
+of the citizens, with a pair of gilt goblets. In reply to
+the Recorder, who in presenting this "litell and powre"
+gift, promised to remember his grace with a better at
+some future time, the prince made the following short
+speech:—<a id="noteref_997" name="noteref_997" href="#note_997"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">997</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">His speech.</span></div></div>
+
+<div class="block tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.80em; margin-left: 3.60em; margin-top: 1.80em; margin-right: 3.60em"><span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-size: 90%; font-style: italic">"Fader Maire, I thank you and your Brethern
+here present of this greate and kynd remembraunce
+which I trist in tyme comyng to deserve. And for asmoche
+as I can not give unto you according thankes,
+I shall pray the Kynges Grace to thank you, and for
+my partye I shall not forget yo</span><span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-size: 90%; font-style: italic; vertical-align: super">r</span></span><span style="font-size: 90%; font-style: italic"> kyndnesse."</span></span></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">In anticipation of the prince's visit, a proclamation
+had been made by the civic authorities with the view
+of purging the city of infectious disease, to the
+effect that all vagabonds and others affected with the
+"greate pockes" should vacate the city on pain of
+imprisonment.<a id="noteref_998" name="noteref_998" href="#note_998"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">998</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Negotiations for a marriage between Prince Arthur and Catherine of Aragon.</span></div></div>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Preparations for reception of the princess, Nov., 1499.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The removal of Warwick—"the one judicial
+murder of Henry's reign"—if not suggested by Spain,
+was an act which could not be otherwise than grateful
+to the Spanish king. For five years past negotiations<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page335">[pg 335]</span><a name="Pg335" id="Pg335" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc185" id="toc185"></a>
+had been proceeding for a marriage between Prince
+Arthur and Catherine of Aragon. Warwick's death
+cleared away the last of Henry's serious competitors,
+and "not a doubtful drop of royal blood" remained
+in the kingdom to oppose Arthur's claim to the
+succession. The princess was expected shortly to
+arrive in England, and a committee composed of
+aldermen and commoners was appointed (Nov. 1499)
+to consult with the king's commissioners as to the
+preparations to be made for her reception.<a id="noteref_999" name="noteref_999" href="#note_999"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">999</span></span></a> Nearly
+two years, however, elapsed before she set foot in
+England. In May, 1500, there were again rumours
+of her approach, and the Common Council voted a
+sum of money to be levied on the wards to defray
+the expenses of her reception.<a id="noteref_1000" name="noteref_1000" href="#note_1000"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1000</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Death of an infant prince, June, 1500.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The "garnysshyng of the pagents" for the festive
+occasion<a id="noteref_1001" name="noteref_1001" href="#note_1001"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1001</span></span></a> was interrupted by the death of Edmund,
+the king's infant son. On the 19th June the members
+of the various craft guilds were ordered to line the
+streets of Old Bailey and Fleet Street, through which
+the funeral procession was to pass on its way to
+Westminster. The mayor and aldermen were to
+stand, clad in their violet gowns, near Saint Dunstan's
+Church, and the next morning to go to Westminster
+by barge to attend the solemn requiem.<a id="noteref_1002" name="noteref_1002" href="#note_1002"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1002</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The marriage of Prince Arthur with Catherine of Aragon, 14 Nov., 1501.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">There was no necessity for hurry in regard to
+the pageants. More than a twelvemonth was yet to
+elapse before they were wanted. At length—on the
+2nd October,<a id="noteref_1003" name="noteref_1003" href="#note_1003"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1003</span></span></a> 1501—the princess landed at Plymouth,<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page336">[pg 336]</span><a name="Pg336" id="Pg336" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+and five days later the City received notice from the
+king of her approach to London. The marriage was
+solemnized at St. Paul's on the 14th November, the
+princess being presented with silver flagons by the
+City in honour of the occasion.<a id="noteref_1004" name="noteref_1004" href="#note_1004"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1004</span></span></a> Five months later
+(2 April, 1502) the bride was a widow, Prince Arthur
+having died at the early age of fifteen.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">More rejoicings in the city, March, 1503</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">In 1503 the streets of the city were again put
+into mourning, for in February of that year Henry
+lost his queen. A long account of the manner of
+"receyvyng of the corps of the most noble princes
+Quene Elizabeth" is given in the City's Archives.<a id="noteref_1005" name="noteref_1005" href="#note_1005"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1005</span></span></a>
+In the following month the streets presented a
+very different appearance, the occasion being the
+solemnization of the league made between Henry and
+the King of the Romans. Bonfires were ordered to be
+lighted at nine different places, and at each of them
+was to be placed a hogshead of wine, with two
+sergeants and two sheriffs' yeomen to prevent disturbance;
+but seeing that it was the Lenten season
+and that the queen had so recently died, there was to
+be no minstrelsy. The City Chamberlain was instructed
+to provide a certain quantity of "Ipocras,"
+claret, Rhenish wine and Muscatel, besides comfits
+and wafers, and two pots of "Succade" and green
+ginger, to be presented on the City's behalf to the
+ambassadors of the King of the Romans, lying at
+"Pasmer Howse"; a similar gift being presented the
+following day on behalf of the sheriffs.<a id="noteref_1006" name="noteref_1006" href="#note_1006"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1006</span></span></a></p>
+
+<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page337">[pg 337]</span><a name="Pg337" id="Pg337" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc186" id="toc186"></a>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Charter of Henry VII to the Tailors of London, 6 June 1503.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Henry's chief merit was that he established order,
+and for this the citizens were grateful. This improvement
+on the weak government of his immediate predecessors
+had only been carried out, however, at the
+cost of extension of royal power, and the City was
+made to suffer with the rest of the kingdom. In
+1503 the civic authorities were deprived by statute
+of their control over the livery companies,<a id="noteref_1007" name="noteref_1007" href="#note_1007"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1007</span></span></a> and in the
+same year the Tailors of London obtained a charter
+which gave umbrage to the mayor and aldermen of
+the City, as ousting them of their jurisdiction. The
+Tailors maintained their independence, and their wardens
+are expressly mentioned as refusing to join the
+Mercers, Grocers, Drapers, Fishmongers, Goldsmiths
+and other fraternities in a petition to parliament
+(1512) for placing them formally under the rule of
+the mayor and aldermen, from which they were frequently
+breaking away.<a id="noteref_1008" name="noteref_1008" href="#note_1008"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1008</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Henry's charter to the City, 23 July, 1505.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">It was not until 1505 that the City succeeded in
+getting its charter<a id="noteref_1009" name="noteref_1009" href="#note_1009"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1009</span></span></a> from Henry, and then only on
+payment of the sum of 5,000 marks. The terms of
+the charter, moreover, were far from satisfactory, and
+an attempt was made to get them altered and obtain
+an abatement of the fine,<a id="noteref_1010" name="noteref_1010" href="#note_1010"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1010</span></span></a> but to no purpose.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Henry's high-handed policy towards the City, 1506-1509.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Henry continued his high-handed policy towards
+the City up to the day of his death, and thereby
+greatly increased his treasure. His chief instruments
+were Empson and Dudley, who took up their residence
+in the city, occupying two houses in Walbrook,<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page338">[pg 338]</span><a name="Pg338" id="Pg338" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+whence each had a door into a garden of the Earl of
+Oxford's house in St. Swithin's Lane.<a id="noteref_1011" name="noteref_1011" href="#note_1011"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1011</span></span></a> There they
+used to meet and concert measures for filling the
+king's purse and their own. In 1506 Henry removed
+Robert Johnson, a goldsmith, from the shrievalty
+within three days of his election, and put William
+Fitz-William in his place. Johnson took the matter
+so much to heart that he died.<a id="noteref_1012" name="noteref_1012" href="#note_1012"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1012</span></span></a> In the same year
+Thomas Kneseworth, the late mayor, was committed
+to the Marshalsea, together with the sheriffs who had
+served under him, and only regained his liberty on
+payment of a large sum of money.<a id="noteref_1013" name="noteref_1013" href="#note_1013"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1013</span></span></a> In 1507 Sir
+William Capel, Alderman of Walbrook Ward, who
+had already fallen a victim to Empson and been
+heavily fined under an obsolete statute, was again
+attacked and fined £2,000 for supposed negligence
+during his mayoralty. Rather than submit to such
+extortion he went to prison, and remained there
+until the king's death, when he obtained his freedom
+and was soon afterwards re-elected mayor.<a id="noteref_1014" name="noteref_1014" href="#note_1014"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1014</span></span></a>
+Lawrence Aylmer, another mayor, was also a victim
+of Henry's tyranny, and was committed to the
+compter, where he remained for the rest of the
+reign.<a id="noteref_1015" name="noteref_1015" href="#note_1015"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1015</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Marriage of the Princess Mary, Dec., 1508.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">In the meantime the Archduke Philip happened
+to fall into Henry's hands (Jan., 1506). Whilst
+crossing the sea to claim the kingdom of Castile<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page339">[pg 339]</span><a name="Pg339" id="Pg339" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc187" id="toc187"></a>
+in right of his wife, he was driven by stress of
+weather into Weymouth. Henry was too shrewd a
+politician not to make the most of so lucky an event,
+and detained him in a species of honourable captivity,
+until Philip had promised him the hand of his sister
+Margaret with a large dower. This marriage alliance
+was destined never to be realised. Another scheme,
+however, was subsequently proposed and met with
+more success. This was a marriage of Henry's own
+daughter with Philip's son Charles, Prince of Castile.
+News of their engagement was conveyed to the
+mayor and aldermen of the City by a letter from the
+king himself (25 Dec., 1507), in which he expatiated
+on the benefits, political and commercial, likely to
+arise from the match.<a id="noteref_1016" name="noteref_1016" href="#note_1016"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1016</span></span></a></p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">This letter was followed by another from the king,
+dated from Greenwich, the 23rd June following, in
+which the Corporation was informed that for the assurance
+of execution of the marriage treaty both parties
+had given pledges, and that the City of London was,
+among other cities and towns, included in letters
+obligatory to that effect, which letters he begged
+should be sealed without delay with the Common Seal
+of the City.<a id="noteref_1017" name="noteref_1017" href="#note_1017"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1017</span></span></a> And so, after the manner of the times,
+the boy of eight was married (by proxy) to the girl of
+twelve, amid great rejoicings in London (17 Dec., 1508).<a id="noteref_1018" name="noteref_1018" href="#note_1018"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1018</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Henry's taste for the fine arts.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">If Henry amassed wealth, it was not from any
+miserly motive. He well knew the value of the
+money, and that peace at home was never better
+secured than by a full treasury. He made, moreover,
+a princely use of his money, encouraging scholarship,<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page340">[pg 340]</span><a name="Pg340" id="Pg340" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+music, and architecture, and dazzled the eyes of foreign
+ambassadors with the splendour of his receptions. That
+he had a fine taste in building no one can deny who has
+once seen the chapel of King's College, Cambridge, or
+the chapel that bears his name at Westminster.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The King's Chapel and Chantry at Westminster.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Originally intended by Henry as a resting place
+for the remains of his uncle, Henry VI, the last mentioned
+edifice was diverted from its purposes and became
+the chantry as well as the tomb of Henry VII
+himself. Anxiety for his soul caused him to bind the
+Abbot of Westminster by heavy penalties to the due
+observance of his obit. These penalties were set out
+in six books or deeds, sealed with the Common Seal of
+the City of London, and formally delivered to the king
+by a deputation of the mayor and aldermen, who received
+in return a seventh book to remain in their
+custody. In 1504—the year that Pope Julius sanctioned
+the removal of the remains of Henry VI from
+Windsor to Westminster—the mayor and citizens
+formally sealed the "books" before the Master of the
+Rolls at the Guildhall. Two years later certain livery
+companies undertook to keep the king's obit on the
+day that the mayor for the time being went to take
+his oath at the Exchequer.<a id="noteref_1019" name="noteref_1019" href="#note_1019"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1019</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The king's death, 22 April, 1509.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The king died at his palace of Shene, recently renamed
+in his honour "Richmond," on the 22nd April,<a id="noteref_1020" name="noteref_1020" href="#note_1020"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1020</span></span></a><span class="tei tei-pb" id="page341">[pg 341]</span><a name="Pg341" id="Pg341" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc188" id="toc188"></a>
+1509. Just before his death he granted a general
+pardon and paid the debts of prisoners committed to
+the compters of London and to Ludgate for debts
+amounting to forty shillings or less.<a id="noteref_1021" name="noteref_1021" href="#note_1021"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1021</span></span></a> His corpse was
+conveyed from Richmond to St. Paul's on the 9th
+May, being met on its way at St. George's Bar, in
+Southwark, by the mayor, aldermen and a suite of
+104 commoners, all in black clothing and all on horseback.
+The streets were lined with other members of
+the companies bearing torches, the lowest craft occupying
+the first place. Next after the freemen of the
+city came the "strangers"—Easterlings, Frenchmen,
+Spaniards, Venetians, Genoese, Florentines and
+"Lukeners"—on horseback and on foot, also bearing
+torches.<a id="noteref_1022" name="noteref_1022" href="#note_1022"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1022</span></span></a> These took up their position in Gracechurch
+Street. Cornhill was occupied by the lower crafts,
+ordered in such a way that "the most worshipful
+crafts" stood next unto "Paules." A similar order
+was preserved the next day, when the corpse was
+removed from Saint Paul's to Westminster. The
+lowest crafts were placed nearest to the Cathedral,
+and the most worshipful next to Temple Bar, where
+the civic escort terminated. The mayor and aldermen
+proceeded to Westminster by water, to attend the
+"masse and offering." The mayor, with his mace in
+his hand, made his offering next after the Lord
+Chamberlain; those aldermen who had passed the
+chair<a id="noteref_1023" name="noteref_1023" href="#note_1023"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1023</span></span></a> offered next after the Knights of the Garter,
+and before all "knights for the body"; whilst the
+aldermen who had not yet served as mayor made
+their offering after the knights.<a id="noteref_1024" name="noteref_1024" href="#note_1024"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1024</span></span></a></p>
+
+<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page342">[pg 342]</span><a name="Pg342" id="Pg342" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">When King Henry VIII was about to make an
+expedition to France in 1544, the Court of Aldermen
+gave notice to the Bishop of London that the obit
+of Henry VII would be kept on Friday, the 16th May,
+on which day there would be a general procession,
+and that the observance would be continued until the
+king departed out of the realm, and then on every
+Friday and Wednesday until his return.<a id="noteref_1025" name="noteref_1025" href="#note_1025"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1025</span></span></a></p>
+</div>
+</div>
+
+<hr class="doublepage" /><div class="tei tei-div" style="margin-bottom: 5.00em; margin-top: 5.00em">
+<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page343">[pg 343]</span><a name="Pg343" id="Pg343" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+<a name="toc189" id="toc189"></a>
+<a name="pdf190" id="pdf190"></a>
+<h1 class="tei tei-head" style="text-align: left; margin-bottom: 3.46em; margin-top: 3.46em"><span style="font-size: 173%">CHAPTER XIII.</span></h1>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"></p>
+<div class="tei tei-div" style="margin-bottom: 4.00em; margin-top: 4.00em">
+<a name="toc191" id="toc191"></a><h2 class="tei tei-head" style="text-align: left; margin-bottom: 2.88em; margin-top: 2.88em"></h2>
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Proceeding against Empson and Dudley and their agents.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">One of the first acts of the new king was to
+grant Letters Patent absolving the City of all trespasses
+committed before the date of his accession,<a id="noteref_1026" name="noteref_1026" href="#note_1026"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1026</span></span></a>
+and to offer restitution to all who had suffered at the
+hands of Empson and Dudley or their agents. Empson
+and Dudley were themselves committed to the
+Tower and afterwards executed. In the meantime
+an enquiry was opened in the city as to recent proceedings
+against Capel and others.</p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">It was found that six men, whose names were
+John Derby, <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">alias</span></span> Wright, a bowyer, Richard Smyth,
+a carpenter, William Sympson, a fuller, Henry Stokton,
+a fishmonger, Thomas Yong, a saddler, and
+Robert Jakes, a shearman—all of whom had more
+than once been convicted of perjury, and on that
+account been struck off inquests—had contrived to get
+themselves replaced on the panel, and had been the
+chief movers in the recent actions against the late
+mayor and other officers of the city. They had,
+moreover, taken bribes for concealment of offences of
+forestalling and regrating. Being found guilty, on
+their own confession, of having brought false charges
+against many of the aldermen, the Court of Common
+Council adjudged the whole of the accused to be
+disfranchised. Three of them, who were found more<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page344">[pg 344]</span><a name="Pg344" id="Pg344" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+guilty than the rest, were sentenced to be taken from
+prison on the next market day, on horseback, without
+saddles, and with their faces turned towards the horses'
+tails, to the pillory on Cornhill. There they were to
+be set "their heddes in the holys" until proclamation
+of their crime and sentence was read. The lesser
+offenders were spared the pillory, but were condemned
+to attend on horseback at Cornhill, whence all the
+offenders were conducted to the Standard in Fleet
+Street "by the most high ways," where the proclamation
+was again read. The culprits were then taken
+back to prison and made to abjure the city on pain of
+imprisonment at the pleasure of the mayor and
+aldermen.<a id="noteref_1027" name="noteref_1027" href="#note_1027"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1027</span></span></a> Among the charges brought against
+Derby was one to the effect that being on a jury he
+had received the sum of ten shillings and "a quarter
+of ffisshe for his howsehold," a bribe which a suitor
+had tendered by the advice and counsel of Thomas
+Yong, saddler, who was apparently acting as Derby's
+accomplice.<a id="noteref_1028" name="noteref_1028" href="#note_1028"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1028</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">City gift on occasion of the king's coronation, 24 June, 1509.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">On the occasion of the king's coronation, which
+took place on Midsummer-day soon after his marriage
+with Catherine of Aragon, his brother's widow, the
+citizens presented the king and queen with the sum
+of £1,000 or 1,500 marks. Two-thirds of the gift
+was given expressly to the king, the remaining one-third
+being a tribute of respect to the queen. The
+money was to be raised in the city by way of a
+fifteenth, but the poor were not to be assessed.<a id="noteref_1029" name="noteref_1029" href="#note_1029"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1029</span></span></a> The
+procession from the Tower to Westminster was equal<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page345">[pg 345]</span><a name="Pg345" id="Pg345" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc192" id="toc192"></a>
+to, if it did not surpass, any spectacle that had yet
+been witnessed in the city for its gorgeousness and
+pomp. The streets were railed and barred from
+Gracechurch Street to Cheapside at the expense of
+the livery companies who lined the way,<a id="noteref_1030" name="noteref_1030" href="#note_1030"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1030</span></span></a> "beginning
+with base and meane occupations and so
+ascending to the worshipful crafts." The Goldsmiths
+of London were especially conspicuous for their marks
+of loyalty on that day. Their stalls, which were
+situate by the Old Change at the west end of Chepe,
+were occupied by fair maidens dressed in white and
+holding tapers of white wax, whilst priests in their
+robes stood by with censers of silver and incensed the
+king and queen as they passed.<a id="noteref_1031" name="noteref_1031" href="#note_1031"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1031</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The war with France, 1512-1513.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">After three years of indolent and luxurious ease
+Henry became embroiled in continental troubles. In
+1511 a holy league had been formed for the purpose
+of driving the French out of the Milanese, and
+Henry's co-operation was desired. A parliament was
+summoned to meet early in the following year.<a id="noteref_1032" name="noteref_1032" href="#note_1032"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1032</span></span></a>
+After granting supplies<a id="noteref_1033" name="noteref_1033" href="#note_1033"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1033</span></span></a> it unanimously agreed that
+war should be proclaimed against France. The campaign
+of 1512 ended ingloriously, and the French<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page346">[pg 346]</span><a name="Pg346" id="Pg346" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+king threatened to turn the tables on Henry and to
+invade England. Henry rose to the occasion and at
+once set about strengthening his navy. On the
+30th January, 1513, he addressed a letter to the Corporation
+of London desiring them to furnish him
+with 300 men, the same to be at Greenwich by the
+15th February at the latest.<a id="noteref_1034" name="noteref_1034" href="#note_1034"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1034</span></span></a> Proclamation was
+thereupon made in the city for all persons who were
+prepared to join the war to appear at the Guildhall
+any time before the 10th February, where, if approved,
+they would be furnished with sufficient harness and
+weapons, without any charge, and also with sufficient
+wages at the king's cost.<a id="noteref_1035" name="noteref_1035" href="#note_1035"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1035</span></span></a></p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The city was suffering at the time from great
+scarcity of wheat, and each alderman was called upon
+to contribute the sum of £5 towards alleviating the
+distress which prevailed. A contract was made with
+certain Hanse merchants to furnish the city with 2,000
+quarters of wheat and rye respectively by Midsummer-day,
+whilst the royal purveyors were forbidden to
+lay hands on wheat, malt or grain entering the port
+of London.<a id="noteref_1036" name="noteref_1036" href="#note_1036"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1036</span></span></a> Under the circumstances it could have
+been no great hardship, but rather an advantage to rid
+the city of 300 mouths. On the 1st February, 1513,
+the aldermen were instructed to enquire in their
+respective wards as to the number of men each ward
+could furnish, and two days later the livery companies
+were ordered to find the sum of £300 to defray the
+expense connected with fitting out the men. If more
+than £300 were needed they were to draw on the
+Chamber, but any money not expended out of that<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page347">[pg 347]</span><a name="Pg347" id="Pg347" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc193" id="toc193"></a>
+sum was to be paid into the Chamber.<a id="noteref_1037" name="noteref_1037" href="#note_1037"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1037</span></span></a> The companies
+raised the sum of £405, the Mercers contributing
+£35, the Grocers, Drapers, Fishmongers and Goldsmiths
+respectively £30, and the rest sums of smaller
+amount.<a id="noteref_1038" name="noteref_1038" href="#note_1038"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1038</span></span></a> There was some difference of opinion as to
+the nature of the uniform to be worn by the city's
+contingent. At length it was settled that the soldiers'
+coats should be white, with a St. George's cross and
+sword, together with a rose, at the back and the same
+before. Their shoes were to be left to the discretion
+of the muster-masters.<a id="noteref_1039" name="noteref_1039" href="#note_1039"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1039</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The Battle of Spurs, 16 Aug., 1513.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Henry himself now crossed over to France. The
+campaign proved more successful than the last, for
+the French being attacked at Guinegate, were seized
+with so great a panic that Henry achieved a bloodless
+victory. From the hasty flight of the French cavalry,
+the engagement came to be known as the Battle of
+Spurs. This victory secured the fall of Terouenne
+and was followed shortly afterwards by the capture
+of Tournay.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Peace with France, 1514.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Notwithstanding these successes, however, Henry
+found it necessary to make peace in the following
+year. His allies had got what they wanted, and the
+conquest of France was as far off as ever. It
+remained only to make as good a bargain as he could.
+The French king consented to the payment of a large
+sum of money, in return for which he was given
+Henry's sister Mary in marriage, although she was
+already affianced, if not married, to Prince Charles
+of Castile. This was the work of the king's new
+minister, Wolsey.</p>
+
+<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page348">[pg 348]</span><a name="Pg348" id="Pg348" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The New Learning.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">To the apostles of the New Learning—as the
+revival of letters which commenced in the last reign
+came to be called—to Erasmus, to Archbishop
+Warham, to More and to Colet, the war at its outset
+had been eminently distasteful. With the accession
+of Henry VIII to the throne they had hoped for
+better things. War was to be for ever banished and
+a "new order" was to prevail.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Thomas More.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Of its connection with More and Colet the City
+is justly proud. At the opening of Henry's reign the
+future lord chancellor was executing the duties of the
+comparatively unimportant post of under-sheriff or
+judge of the Poultry Compter, a post which he continued
+to hold until 1517.<a id="noteref_1040" name="noteref_1040" href="#note_1040"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1040</span></span></a> He had received his
+education in the city at St. Antony's School in Threadneedle
+Street, a school which had already achieved a
+great reputation and afterwards reckoned among its
+pupils the famous Whitgift. Later in life he shut
+himself up for four years in the Charterhouse of
+London, living a life of devotion and prayer, but
+without taking any vow.<a id="noteref_1041" name="noteref_1041" href="#note_1041"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1041</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Dean Colet.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The father of John Colet, Dean of St. Paul's, had
+taken an active part in municipal life. Henry Colet
+had been alderman first of Farringdon Ward Without
+and afterwards of the Wards of Castle Baynard and
+Cornhill,<a id="noteref_1042" name="noteref_1042" href="#note_1042"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1042</span></span></a> and as alderman of the last mentioned ward<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page349">[pg 349]</span><a name="Pg349" id="Pg349" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc194" id="toc194"></a>
+he had died towards the close of 1505. He had
+served as sheriff in 1477 and as mayor in 1486.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Education in the city.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Up to the time of Henry VI education had been
+carried on in the city chiefly by means of schools
+attached to the various city churches and religious
+houses. By order of Henry VI, and at the instigation
+of four city ministers,<a id="noteref_1043" name="noteref_1043" href="#note_1043"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1043</span></span></a> grammar schools were established
+in several parishes. The school of St. Antony
+attached to the hospital of the same name, of which
+Dr. John Carpenter was at the time master, received
+an endowment from Henry VI for the maintenance of
+scholars at Oxford. The school continued to flourish
+some time after the dissolution of the hospital. There
+was also a school attached to the hospital of St.
+Thomas of Acon, as famous in its day as that of
+St. Antony, but of which little is known until after the
+suppression of the religious houses by Henry VIII,
+when it passed into the hands of the Mercers' Company
+and became known, as it is to this day, as the Mercers'
+School.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The City of London School.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The Dr. John Carpenter just mentioned must not
+be confounded with the Town Clerk of that name,
+the compiler of the famous <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Liber Albus</span></span> and the
+founder of the City of London School. There is little
+known of the foundation of this latter school beyond
+the statement made by Stow a century and a-half
+later, that he "gave tenements to the city for the
+finding and bringing up of four poor men's children
+with meat, drink, apparel, learning at the schools in
+the universities, etc., until they be preferred, and<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page350">[pg 350]</span><a name="Pg350" id="Pg350" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+then others in their places for ever."<a id="noteref_1044" name="noteref_1044" href="#note_1044"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1044</span></span></a> Within the
+last few years the City Chamberlain's accounts—touching
+"the lands of Mr. John Carpenter, sometyme
+commen clarke of this cittie"—have been brought
+to light, and serve to supplement in a small way
+Stow's meagre but valuable statement. The rental
+or amount with which the Chamberlain charged
+himself for the year 1565 or 1566 is there set down
+as £41 0<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">s.</span></span> 4<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">d.</span></span>, and the discharge—embracing a quit
+rent due to the Dean and Chapter of Westminster,
+and expenses incurred in overseeing, clothing and
+feeding four poor children "being founde at scoole
+and lerning by the bequeste of the sayde Master
+Carpenter"—amounted to £19 12<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">s.</span></span> 8<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">d.</span></span>, leaving a
+balance to the City of £21 7<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">s.</span></span> 8<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">d.</span></span><a id="noteref_1045" name="noteref_1045" href="#note_1045"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1045</span></span></a> From so modest
+a beginning arose the school which, situate on the
+Thames Embankment, now numbers over 700 scholars.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">St. Paul's School.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">There was a school attached to St. Paul's long
+before Colet's day, just as there is one now, independent
+of the school of Colet's foundation, and devoted
+mainly to the instruction of the Cathedral choristers.
+Soon after Colet's appointment to the Deanery in
+1505 he experienced no little dissatisfaction with
+the Cathedral School, where great laxity prevailed,
+more especially in the religious education of the
+"children of Paul's," and so, about the year 1509—the
+year of Henry's accession—having recently come
+into a considerable estate by the death of his father,
+he set about acquiring a small property situate at the
+east end of St. Paul's Church for the purpose of
+establishing another school which would better realise<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page351">[pg 351]</span><a name="Pg351" id="Pg351" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc195" id="toc195"></a>
+his own ideal of what a school should be than the
+existing Cathedral School. Colet's School grew apace.
+In 1511 he was in negotiation with the Court of
+Aldermen for the purchase "of a certen grounde of
+the citie for an entre to be hadde into his new
+gramer scole."<a id="noteref_1046" name="noteref_1046" href="#note_1046"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1046</span></span></a> By January of the next year (1512)
+he had succeeded in obtaining the assent both of the
+Court of Aldermen and Common Council to the
+purchase by him of a "certen grounde in the Olde
+Chaunge for the inlargyng of his gramer scole in
+Powly's Churcheyerd" for the sum of £30.<a id="noteref_1047" name="noteref_1047" href="#note_1047"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1047</span></span></a> The
+property was conveyed to him by deed, dated the
+27th September, which deed was sealed with the
+common seal on the 7th October following.<a id="noteref_1048" name="noteref_1048" href="#note_1048"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1048</span></span></a> The
+question as to whom he should entrust the management
+of his school caused Colet no little anxiety.
+He eventually decided to confide its revenues and
+management entirely to the Mercers' Company, and
+when asked the reason for his so doing replied that
+"though there was nothing certain in human affairs
+he yet found the least corruption in them."<a id="noteref_1049" name="noteref_1049" href="#note_1049"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1049</span></span></a></p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Considerable rivalry existed among the various
+grammar schools of the city, more especially between
+the boys of Colet's School and the boys of the more
+ancient foundation of St. Antony, which, for a long
+time, had the reputation for turning out the best
+scholars. Public disputations were held in the open
+air. The St. Paul's boys meeting St. Antony's boys
+would derisively call them St. Antony's pigs, that
+saint being generally represented with a pig following<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page352">[pg 352]</span><a name="Pg352" id="Pg352" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+him, and challenge them to a disputation; the latter
+would retaliate by styling their rivals "pigeons of
+St. Paul's," from the bird which then, as now, frequented
+St. Paul's Churchyard. From questions of
+grammar, writes Stow,<a id="noteref_1050" name="noteref_1050" href="#note_1050"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1050</span></span></a> they usually fell to blows
+"with their satchels full of books, many times in
+great heaps, that they troubled the streets and
+passengers." After the decay of St. Antony's School
+the rivalry was taken up, but in a more friendly way,
+by the later foundation of the Merchant Taylors'
+School.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Provincial grammar schools founded by citizens of London.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">But the citizens of London did not limit their
+efforts in the cause of education to their own city.
+Throughout the country there are to be found
+grammar schools which owe their establishment to
+the liberal-mindedness and open-handed generosity of
+the city merchant.<a id="noteref_1051" name="noteref_1051" href="#note_1051"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1051</span></span></a> Their existence bears testimony
+to the kindly feeling which men who had grown rich
+in London still bore to the provincial town or village
+which gave them birth and which they had left in
+early life to seek their fortune in the great metropolis.</p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">To take but a few instances: Sir John Percival,
+a merchant-tailor, who in 1487 filled the subordinate
+office of Lord Mayor's carver, performing his duties
+so well that the mayor, Sir Henry Colet, nominated
+him one of the sheriffs for the year ensuing by the
+time honoured custom of drinking to him at a public
+dinner, founded a school at Macclesfield. Stephen<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page353">[pg 353]</span><a name="Pg353" id="Pg353" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc196" id="toc196"></a>
+Jenyns, another merchant-tailor, did the same thing at
+Wolverhampton. Sir Thomas White, another member
+of the same company, founded two schools in the
+provinces, one at Reading and another at Bristol,
+besides the College of St. John at Oxford. Sir
+William Harper, yet another merchant-tailor, established
+a school at Bedford.</p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The Mercers' Company rivalled the Merchant-Taylors'
+in the number of schools established in the
+country through the liberality of its members. Sir
+John Gresham founded one at Holt, in Norfolk; Sir
+Rowland Hill, an ancestor of the originator of the
+Penny Postal scheme, another at Drayton, in Shropshire;
+whilst schools at Horsham, in Sussex, and
+West Lavington, in Wiltshire, were erected by two
+other mercers, Richard Collier and William Dauntsey.
+There exist at the present day at least four schools
+which owe their foundation to wealthy members of
+the Grocers' Company, the well known school at
+Oundle, co. Northampton, upon which the Company
+have expended on capital account the sum of
+£35,000, having been founded by Sir William Laxton;
+another at Sevenoaks, in Kent, by William Sevenoke,
+a native of the place, who rose from very humble
+circumstances to the chief magistracy of the city;
+another at Witney, in Oxfordshire, by Henry Box,
+and another at Colwall, co. Hereford, by Humphry
+Walwyn. Sir Andrew Judd, a member of the Skinners'
+Company, established a school at Tonbridge, whilst
+Sir Wolstan Dixie, another skinner, performed the
+same charitable act at Market Bosworth. Lastly,
+Sir George Monoux and Thomas Russell, both of
+them members of the Drapers' Company, founded<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page354">[pg 354]</span><a name="Pg354" id="Pg354" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+schools at Walthamstow and at Barton-under-Needwood,
+co. Stafford, respectively.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Birth of the Princess Mary, Feb., 1516.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">On the Feast of St. Matthew (21 Sept.), 1515, a
+messenger arrived in the city from Wolsey desiring
+the mayor and aldermen to attend that evening at
+St. Paul's to return thanks to Almighty God for the
+queen, who was quick with child. The summons was
+obeyed,<a id="noteref_1052" name="noteref_1052" href="#note_1052"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1052</span></span></a> and in the following February (1516) the
+Princess Mary was born.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The city and Cardinal Wolsey, 1516.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">By this time Wolsey had risen to be a great
+power in the State. In 1514 he had been made
+Archbishop of York, and in the following year a
+cardinal. His high position as a prince of the Church,
+as well as his authority with the king, rendered it
+desirable for the citizens to keep well with him. On
+the 6th March, 1516, it was resolved to send a deputation
+to the cardinal for the purpose of securing his
+favour. No expense was to be spared in the matter,
+and all costs and charges were to be paid by the
+Chamber.<a id="noteref_1053" name="noteref_1053" href="#note_1053"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1053</span></span></a> In the following June the cardinal handed
+to the mayor a list of abuses in the city which required
+reform. Sedition was rife there; the commons were
+disobedient, the statute of apparel was ignored, vagabonds
+and masterless folk resorted there and unlawful
+games were allowed in houses. The king's council
+required an answer on these points within a few days,
+and an answer was accordingly given, but the purport
+of it is not recorded, although it was read to the
+Court of Aldermen before being despatched.<a id="noteref_1054" name="noteref_1054" href="#note_1054"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1054</span></span></a></p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">In November of the same year (1516) the City
+was in difficulties with the recently erected Court of<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page355">[pg 355]</span><a name="Pg355" id="Pg355" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc197" id="toc197"></a>
+Star Chamber, and Wolsey, who practically kept the
+whole business of government in his own hands, came
+to the City's assistance with advice. It appears that
+a subsidy was due on the 21st of this month and the
+City had not paid its quota. The mayor and aldermen
+were cited to appear before the cardinal and other lords
+of the council in the Star Chamber at Westminster.
+Being asked if they had "sworne for their assayng,"
+to the king's subsidy, the Recorder answered on their
+behalf that such procedure was contrary to Act of
+Parliament. The cardinal thereupon advised them to
+agree to give the king £2,000 in order to be discharged
+of their oaths "or ells every of theym to be sworn of
+and uppon the true value of their substance within
+the sum of 100 marks." This took place on Saturday,
+the 22nd, and the mayor and aldermen were to give
+an answer to the Star Chamber by the following
+Wednesday. On Tuesday, the 25th, the Court of
+Aldermen met to consider what was best to be done
+under the circumstances. The decision they arrived
+at was that as the present assessment was less than
+the last, they would, in consideration of the king's
+letters, make up the sum then payable so that it
+should equal the last assessment.<a id="noteref_1055" name="noteref_1055" href="#note_1055"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1055</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Evil Mayday, 1517.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The seditious "brutes" or riots of which Wolsey
+had complained as daily occurring in the city were
+soon to assume a serious form. They were occasioned
+for the most part by the jealousy with which everybody
+who was not a freeman of the city was looked
+upon by the free citizen. The influx of strangers and
+foreigners has been daily increasing, notwithstanding
+the limitations and restrictions placed upon their<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page356">[pg 356]</span><a name="Pg356" id="Pg356" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+residence and mode of trading,<a id="noteref_1056" name="noteref_1056" href="#note_1056"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1056</span></span></a> whilst the tendency
+of freemen had been to leave the city for the
+country.<a id="noteref_1057" name="noteref_1057" href="#note_1057"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1057</span></span></a></p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Whilst the civic authorities were doing all they
+could to prevent the possibility of a disturbance
+arising on the coming May-day<a id="noteref_1058" name="noteref_1058" href="#note_1058"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1058</span></span></a>—a day kept as a
+general holiday in the city—occasion was taken by
+a minister of the church, whose duty it was to preach
+the usual Spital sermon on Easter Tuesday (14 April),
+to incite the freemen to rise up against the foreigner
+and stranger.<a id="noteref_1059" name="noteref_1059" href="#note_1059"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1059</span></span></a> When the 1st May arrived all might
+have been well, had not a city alderman allowed his
+zeal to outrun his discretion. It happened that John
+Mundy,<a id="noteref_1060" name="noteref_1060" href="#note_1060"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1060</span></span></a> Alderman of Queenhithe Ward, came across
+some youngsters playing "at the bucklers" at a time
+when by a recent order they should have been within
+doors, and he commanded them to desist. This they
+showed no disposition to do, and when force was
+threatened raised the cry for 'prentices and clubs. A
+large crowd quickly assembled and the alderman had
+to beat a hasty retreat. The mob, now thoroughly
+roused, proceeded to set free the prisoners in Newgate
+and the compters, and to attack the strangers and<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page357">[pg 357]</span><a name="Pg357" id="Pg357" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc198" id="toc198"></a>
+foreigners quartered at Blanchappleton<a id="noteref_1061" name="noteref_1061" href="#note_1061"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1061</span></span></a> and elsewhere.
+Rioting continued throughout the night, but early the
+following morning they were met by a large force which
+the mayor in the meantime had collected, and 300 of
+them were made prisoners, so that by the time that
+assistance arrived from the court quiet had been
+restored. A commission of Oyer and Terminer was
+opened at the Guildhall to try the offenders. John
+Lincoln, who had not so long ago been appointed
+surveyor of goods bought and sold by foreigners,<a id="noteref_1062" name="noteref_1062" href="#note_1062"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1062</span></span></a> was
+charged with being the instigator of the riot, and being
+found guilty was hanged in Cheapside, whilst twelve
+others were hanged on gallows in different parts of
+the city. Others received the king's pardon with
+halters round their necks in token of the fate they
+deserved.<a id="noteref_1063" name="noteref_1063" href="#note_1063"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1063</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The City anxious to regain the king's lost favour.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The civic authorities were not unnaturally anxious
+to make their peace with the king, and to disclaim
+any complicity in the late outbreak. The Court of
+Aldermen met on the 11th May to consider how
+best to approach his majesty on so delicate a subject.
+It was decided to send a deputation to the lord
+cardinal to "feel his mind" as to the number of
+persons that should appear before the king. The
+next day eight aldermen and the Recorder were
+nominated by the court "to go the Kinges grace and
+to knowe his plesure when the Mayr and Aldremen<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page358">[pg 358]</span><a name="Pg358" id="Pg358" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+and diverse of the substancyall commoners of this
+citie shall sue to beseche his grace to be good and
+gracious lord un to theym and to accept theym
+nowe beyng most sorrowful and hevye for thees
+late attemptates doon ayeynst their wylles."<a id="noteref_1064" name="noteref_1064" href="#note_1064"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1064</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">A deputation attends the king at Greenwich, 11 May, 1517.</span></div></div>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Wolsey and other lords to be bought over with gifts.</span></div></div>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The king's pardon obtained, 22 May.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The deputation forthwith proceeded, clothed in
+gowns of black, to Greenwich, whither the king had
+gone on the 11th May. The Recorder as usual acted
+as spokesman, and humbly prayed the royal forgiveness
+for the negligence displayed by the mayor in not
+keeping the king's peace within the city. The king
+in reply told them plainly his opinion that the civic
+authorities had winked at the whole business, and
+referred them to Cardinal Wolsey, his chancellor,
+who would declare to them his pleasure.<a id="noteref_1065" name="noteref_1065" href="#note_1065"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1065</span></span></a> With
+this answer the deputation withdrew and reported
+what had taken place to the mayor, who had wisely
+kept away. It was clear that above all things the
+favour of the cardinal had to be obtained. For this
+purpose a committee was appointed, whose duty it
+was to "devise what thinges of plesur shalbe geven
+to my lord Cardynall and to other of the lordes as
+they shall thynk convenient for their benevolences
+doon concernyng this last Insurreccioun."<a id="noteref_1066" name="noteref_1066" href="#note_1066"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1066</span></span></a> By the
+22nd May matters had evidently been accommodated.
+On that date the king sat at Westminster Hall in
+great state, surrounded by the lords of his council and
+attended by the cardinal. The mayor and aldermen
+and chief commoners of the city, chosen from the
+leading civic companies,<a id="noteref_1067" name="noteref_1067" href="#note_1067"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1067</span></span></a> had arrived by nine o'clock
+in the morning clad in their best liveries, "according<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page359">[pg 359]</span><a name="Pg359" id="Pg359" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc199" id="toc199"></a>
+as the cardinal had commanded them."<a id="noteref_1068" name="noteref_1068" href="#note_1068"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1068</span></span></a> Wolsey
+knew the king's weakness for theatrical display. At
+Henry's command all the prisoners were brought
+into his presence. They appeared, to the number of
+400 men and eleven women, all with ropes round
+their necks. After the cardinal had administered a
+rebuke to the civic authorities for their negligence,
+and had declared that the prisoners had deserved
+death, a formal pardon was proclaimed by the king,
+the cardinal exhorting all present to loyalty and
+obedience. It was some time before the effects of
+the late outbreak disappeared. Compensation for
+losses had to be made;<a id="noteref_1069" name="noteref_1069" href="#note_1069"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1069</span></span></a> some were bound over to
+keep the peace;<a id="noteref_1070" name="noteref_1070" href="#note_1070"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1070</span></span></a> and counsel were employed to
+draw up a statement of the points of grievance between
+the citizens and merchant strangers for submission
+to the king.<a id="noteref_1071" name="noteref_1071" href="#note_1071"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1071</span></span></a> In September there were
+rumours of another outbreak, but the civic authorities
+were better prepared than formerly, and effectually
+stopt any such attempt by putting suspected persons
+into prison.</p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Lest any unfavourable report should reach the
+cardinal, the Recorder and another were ordered to
+ride in all haste to Sion, where Wolsey was thought to
+be, and if they failed to find him there, to follow him
+to Windsor and to report to him the active measures
+that had been taken to prevent any further insurrection
+in the city.<a id="noteref_1072" name="noteref_1072" href="#note_1072"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1072</span></span></a> "Evil May-day" was long remembered
+by the citizens, who raised objection to Thomas
+Semer or Seymer, who had been sheriff at the<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page360">[pg 360]</span><a name="Pg360" id="Pg360" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+time, being elected mayor ten years later.<a id="noteref_1073" name="noteref_1073" href="#note_1073"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1073</span></span></a> In May,
+1547, all householders were straitly charged not to permit
+their servants any more to go maying, but to keep
+them within doors.<a id="noteref_1074" name="noteref_1074" href="#note_1074"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1074</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The epidemic of 1518.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">With gibbets all over the city, each bearing a
+ghastly freight, and the summer approaching, it is
+scarcely surprising that the city should soon again be
+visited with an epidemic. "At the city gates," wrote
+an eye-witness, "one sees nothing but gibbets and the
+quarters of these wretches"—the wretches who had
+been hanged for complicity in the late disturbance—"so
+that it is horrible to pass near them."<a id="noteref_1075" name="noteref_1075" href="#note_1075"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1075</span></span></a> The
+"sweating sickness," which had again made its appearance
+in 1516, and had never really quitted the
+city (except for a few weeks in winter), now raged
+more violently than ever, accompanied by measles
+and small-pox. The king ordered all inhabitants of
+infected houses to keep indoors and hang out wisps
+of straw, and when compelled to walk abroad to carry
+white rods.<a id="noteref_1076" name="noteref_1076" href="#note_1076"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1076</span></span></a> This order, however, was badly received
+in the city and gave rise to much murmuring and
+dissatisfaction.<a id="noteref_1077" name="noteref_1077" href="#note_1077"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1077</span></span></a> The civic authorities did what they
+could to mitigate the evil by driving out beggars
+and vagabonds, and removing slaughter-houses outside
+the city walls,<a id="noteref_1078" name="noteref_1078" href="#note_1078"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1078</span></span></a> as well as by administering relief to the
+poorer classes by the distribution of tokens or licences<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page361">[pg 361]</span><a name="Pg361" id="Pg361" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc200" id="toc200"></a>
+to solicit alms. These tokens consisted of round
+"beedes" of white tin, bearing the City's arms in
+the centre, to be worn on the right shoulder.<a id="noteref_1079" name="noteref_1079" href="#note_1079"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1079</span></span></a> In
+the midst of so much real suffering, there were
+not wanting those who took advantage of the charitable
+feeling which the crisis called forth and were not
+ashamed to gain a livelihood by simulating illness.
+Such a one was Miles Rose, who on the 11th March,
+1518, openly confessed before the Court of Aldermen
+that he had frequently dissembled the sickness of
+the "fallyng evyle" (or epilepsy) in divers parish
+churches in the city, on which occasions "jemewes"
+of silver, called cramp rings, would as often as not
+be placed on his fingers by charitable passers-by, with
+which he would quickly make off, pocketing at the
+same time many a twopence which had been bestowed
+upon him.<a id="noteref_1080" name="noteref_1080" href="#note_1080"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1080</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Marriage of the infant Princess Mary with the Dauphin, 5 Oct., 1518.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The city could scarcely have recovered its wonted
+appearance after the ravages of the pestilence before
+its streets were enlivened with one of those magnificent
+displays for which London became justly famous,
+the occasion being an embassy from the French king
+sent to negotiate a marriage treaty between Henry's
+daughter Mary, a child but two years of age, and
+the still younger Dauphin of France. The City
+Records, strange to say, appear to be altogether
+silent on this subject, and yet the embassy, for
+magnificent display, was such as had never been seen
+within its walls before. We can understand that the
+embassy was not acceptable to the thrifty middle-class
+trading burgess, when we read that it was accompanied<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page362">[pg 362]</span><a name="Pg362" id="Pg362" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+by a swarm of pedlars and petty hucksters who
+showed an unbecoming anxiety to do business in
+hats, caps and other merchandise, which under colour
+of the embassy had been smuggled into the country
+duty free.<a id="noteref_1081" name="noteref_1081" href="#note_1081"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1081</span></span></a> The foreign retail trader was at the best of
+times an abomination to the free burgess, and this sharp
+practice on the part of the Frenchmen, coming so soon
+after the recent outburst against strangers on Evil
+May-day, only served to accentuate his animosity—"At
+this dooing mannie an Englishman grudged, but
+it availed not."<a id="noteref_1082" name="noteref_1082" href="#note_1082"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1082</span></span></a> The ambassadors were lodged at
+the Merchant Taylors' Hall, which, owing to the
+ill-timed action of the French pedlars, had the look of
+a mart. On Sunday, the 3rd October, the king, with
+a train of 1,000 mounted gentlemen richly dressed,
+attended by the legates and foreign ambassadors, went
+in procession to St. Paul's to hear mass; after which
+the king took his oath—a ceremonial which the French
+admiral declared to be "too magnificent for description."
+On the following Tuesday (5 Oct.) the marriage
+ceremony—so far as it could be carried out
+between such infants—was celebrated at Greenwich,
+and a tiny gold ring, in which was a valuable diamond,
+placed upon Mary's finger.<a id="noteref_1083" name="noteref_1083" href="#note_1083"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1083</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Preparations for the reception of the legate in the city, July, 1519.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">In the following year (July, 1519) the streets
+witnessed another scene of gaiety. This time it was
+a visit of the legate, Cardinal Campeggio, for which
+the civic authorities made great preparations.<a id="noteref_1084" name="noteref_1084" href="#note_1084"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1084</span></span></a> In<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page363">[pg 363]</span><a name="Pg363" id="Pg363" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc201" id="toc201"></a>
+the first place the mayor and aldermen, in their gowns
+and cloaks of scarlet, were ordered to take up their
+position at 9 o'clock on the morning of Relic Sunday
+(<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">i.e.</span></span>, the third Sunday after Midsummer Day) at St.
+Paul's stairs (<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">the stayers w</span><span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic; vertical-align: super">t</span></span><span style="font-style: italic">in poulys</span></span>). Next to them
+were to stand the Skinners, then the Mercers and
+other worshipful crafts in their order, clothed in their
+last and best livery. In this manner the street was
+to be lined on either side from the west door of St.
+Paul's down to Baynard's Castle. Upon the arrival
+of the lord cardinal and other lords at the Cathedral
+the mayor and aldermen were to head the procession
+and seat themselves in the choir to hear <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Te Deum</span></span>
+sung. Bonfires or "pryncypall fyres" were to be
+lighted at St. Magnus corner, Gracechurch, Leadenhall,
+the conduit on Cornhill, St. Thomas "of Acres,"
+the Standard and little conduit in Cheap, the Standard
+in Fleet Street, and in Bishopsgate Street; whilst
+cresset lights and small fires "made after the manner
+of Midsummer-night" were to add to the gaiety of the
+scene. Men-at-arms, well harnessed and apparelled,
+were to keep certain streets, whilst the aldermen and
+their constables were to keep watch and ward in their
+best array of harness. The ambassadors, who were to
+be lodged in Cornhill, were to be escorted home at night
+by the aldermen with torches, and to await their commands.
+There was one other, perhaps not unnecessary,
+direction to be followed, which was to the effect that
+if by any chance the strangers should be overcome
+by the hospitality of the city, or, in the words of the
+record—"yf eny oversyght be w<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="vertical-align: super">t</span></span> moche drynke of
+the strangers"—the citizens were to "lett theym
+alone and no Englishemen to medyle w<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="vertical-align: super">t</span></span> theym."</p>
+
+<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page364">[pg 364]</span><a name="Pg364" id="Pg364" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The legate lands at Deal, 23 July, 1519.</span></div></div>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">A story told of his passage through the city.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The legate landed at Deal on the 23rd July, and
+by slow stages was conducted with every mark of
+respect to London. His passage through the city
+was associated with an episode of a decidedly comic
+character if we are to believe the chronicler. A story
+is told<a id="noteref_1085" name="noteref_1085" href="#note_1085"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1085</span></span></a> that the night before Campeggio entered
+London, Wolsey sent him twelve mules with (empty)
+coffers, in order to give a semblance of wealth to the
+legate and his retinue. In Cheapside one of the mules
+turned restive and upset the chests, out of which
+tumbled old hose, shoes, bread, meat, and eggs, with
+"muche vile baggage," at which the street boys cried
+"See, see my lord legate's treasure!" The story,
+however, is on good authority deemed more malicious
+than probable.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The contest for the empire, 1519.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">In January, 1519, the Emperor Maximilian died
+and left the imperial crown to be contested for by the
+kings of France and Spain. It eventually fell to the
+latter, and Charles V of Spain was elected Emperor
+Charles I, the event being celebrated by a solemn
+mass and <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Te Deum</span></span> at St. Paul's, followed by a
+banquet at Castle Baynard.<a id="noteref_1086" name="noteref_1086" href="#note_1086"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1086</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The emperor's visit to the city, 1522.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Both France and Germany were eager to secure
+the co-operation of Henry. Charles anticipated the
+meeting which was to take place between Henry and
+Francis on the famous Field of the Cloth of Gold by
+coming over in person to England (May, 1519) and
+having a private conference with his uncle. The
+young emperor did not visit the city on this occasion;
+but in 1522, when war had broken out between him
+and Francis and he was again in England, he was<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page365">[pg 365]</span><a name="Pg365" id="Pg365" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc202" id="toc202"></a>
+escorted to the city with great honour and handsomely
+lodged in the palace of Bridewell. Nearly £1,000
+was raised to meet the expenses of his reception and
+of furnishing a body of 100 bowmen for the king's
+service.<a id="noteref_1087" name="noteref_1087" href="#note_1087"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1087</span></span></a></p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The king and his guest and ally were met at St.
+George's Bar in Southwark by John Melborne,<a id="noteref_1088" name="noteref_1088" href="#note_1088"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1088</span></span></a> the
+mayor, accompanied by the high officers of the city,
+clothed in gowns of "pewke," each with a chain of
+gold about his neck.<a id="noteref_1089" name="noteref_1089" href="#note_1089"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1089</span></span></a> A "proposicioun" or address
+was made by Sir Thomas More, now under-treasurer
+of England, who was afterwards presented by the
+City with the sum of £10 towards a velvet gown,<a id="noteref_1090" name="noteref_1090" href="#note_1090"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1090</span></span></a>
+whilst other speeches made in the course of the
+procession were composed by Master Lilly,<a id="noteref_1091" name="noteref_1091" href="#note_1091"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1091</span></span></a> of
+Euphues fame, the first high master of Colet's School.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Pestilence and famine, 1519-1522.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Between the first and second visits of the emperor
+the citizens had witnessed some strange sights and
+had gone through much suffering and privation. The
+city had scarcely ever been free from sickness, and
+famine and pestilence had followed one another in
+quick succession. In September, 1520, the fellowships
+or civic companies subscribed over £1,000 for
+the purchase of wheat<a id="noteref_1092" name="noteref_1092" href="#note_1092"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1092</span></span></a> to be stored at the Bridgehouse,
+where ovens were fitted up.<a id="noteref_1093" name="noteref_1093" href="#note_1093"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1093</span></span></a> Mills for grinding
+corn already existed in the Thames hard by.<a id="noteref_1094" name="noteref_1094" href="#note_1094"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1094</span></span></a> The
+following year the plague raged to such an extent<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page366">[pg 366]</span><a name="Pg366" id="Pg366" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+that every house attacked was ordered to be marked
+with St. Antony's cross, "otherwise called the syne
+of Tav,"<a id="noteref_1095" name="noteref_1095" href="#note_1095"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1095</span></span></a> and citizens were forbidden to attend the
+fair at Windsor for fear of carrying infection to the
+court.<a id="noteref_1096" name="noteref_1096" href="#note_1096"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1096</span></span></a></p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Again a scarcity of corn was feared, and the
+Bridge-masters were authorised by the Court of Common
+Council to purchase provisions, the corporation
+undertaking to give security for the repayment of all
+monies advanced by the charitably disposed for the
+purpose of staving off famine.<a id="noteref_1097" name="noteref_1097" href="#note_1097"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1097</span></span></a> Early in 1522 (15 Jan.)
+died Fitz-James, Bishop of London, carried off with
+many others by "a great death in London and other
+places of the realm."<a id="noteref_1098" name="noteref_1098" href="#note_1098"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1098</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Execution of the Duke of Buckingham, 1521.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The citizens had also in the meanwhile witnessed
+the arrest and execution of the Duke of Buckingham,
+son of the duke who figured so prominently before the
+citizens when the crown was offered to Richard III
+at Baynard Castle. He was seized one day whilst
+landing from his barge at the Hay Wharf, on a
+number of charges all more or less frivolous. His
+attendants were dismissed to the duke's "Manor of
+the Rose," in the parish of St. Laurence Pountney<a id="noteref_1099" name="noteref_1099" href="#note_1099"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1099</span></span></a>—on
+the site of which recently stood Merchant Taylors'
+School—whilst he himself was conducted to the Tower
+(16 April, 1521). An indictment was laid against<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page367">[pg 367]</span><a name="Pg367" id="Pg367" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc203" id="toc203"></a>
+him at the Guildhall before Sir John Brugge, lord
+mayor, and others (8 May). After a trial at Westminster
+which lasted some days, he was found guilty
+of high treason, and condemned to be hanged, drawn
+and quartered, and to suffer such other atrocities as
+usually accompanied the death of a traitor in those
+days. The king, however, satisfied with his condemnation,
+spared him these indignities, and the duke
+was allowed to meet his death at the block. His
+corpse was reverently carried from the Tower to the
+Church of the Austin Friars by six poor members of
+that Order.<a id="noteref_1100" name="noteref_1100" href="#note_1100"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1100</span></span></a></p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The duke had other friends in the city besides
+these poor religious men, who thus requited in the only
+way they could many acts of kindness done to their
+Order by Buckingham in his life time, and his death
+gave rise to much disaffection and seditious language
+for some time afterwards.<a id="noteref_1101" name="noteref_1101" href="#note_1101"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1101</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">City loan of £20,000 to assist the king against France, 1522.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Before the emperor left England he succeeded in
+committing Henry to an invasion of France. In order
+to carry out his object the king needed money, and
+the City was asked to furnish him with the sum of
+£100,000.<a id="noteref_1102" name="noteref_1102" href="#note_1102"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1102</span></span></a> Ten days later (26 May) the City
+agreed to advance £20,000. The livery companies
+were to be called upon to surrender their plate, and<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page368">[pg 368]</span><a name="Pg368" id="Pg368" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+foreigners as well as citizens were to be made to
+contribute.<a id="noteref_1103" name="noteref_1103" href="#note_1103"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1103</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The aldermen to be assessed with the commoners and not to be severed.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The question arose whether the aldermen should
+be jointly assessed with the commoners or by themselves.
+The mayor and aldermen were willing to
+contribute the sum of £3,000,<a id="noteref_1104" name="noteref_1104" href="#note_1104"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1104</span></span></a> but this offer the
+Common Council "nothyng regarded," but sent the
+common sergeant to talk the matter over with them.
+After long consultation the mayor and aldermen sent
+back word that it was more "convenient" that they
+should be assessed with the commoners and not to be
+severed.<a id="noteref_1105" name="noteref_1105" href="#note_1105"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1105</span></span></a></p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">In the meantime a hasty valuation had been made
+by the command of Wolsey of the plate of the livery
+companies, and of the ready money lying in their
+halls, the whole value of which was estimated to be
+£4,000. This, together with the sum of £10,000
+which the Court of Aldermen purposed raising among
+the wealthier class of citizens, was all that the cardinal
+was given to expect from the City.<a id="noteref_1106" name="noteref_1106" href="#note_1106"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1106</span></span></a> On the 24th
+May the deputation, which had ridden with all speed
+after the cardinal in order to make this report, returned
+to the city and reported to the Court of Aldermen
+that his grace was in no wise satisfied with the City's
+offer, and that he expected the City to furnish the king
+with at least £30,000, of which £10,000 was to be
+ready within three days.<a id="noteref_1107" name="noteref_1107" href="#note_1107"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1107</span></span></a> The matter was compromised
+by the City consenting to advance £20,000.</p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">In June the Recorder had an interview with Wolsey
+respecting the security to be given for repayment<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page369">[pg 369]</span><a name="Pg369" id="Pg369" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc204" id="toc204"></a>
+of the loan. The cardinal refused to allow that
+certain abbots, abbesses and priors, who had been
+named, should enter into bond, and the citizens were
+obliged to be content with the personal securities of
+the king and Wolsey himself. Touching the plate of
+the halls, the cardinal wished only to take it in case
+of absolute necessity, and then only at a fair price.
+He desired the owners to bring it to the Tower, "there
+to be coyned and they [<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">i.e.</span></span>, the government] to pay
+the seyd money that so shalbe coyned." The result
+of the Recorder's interview was reported to the Court
+of Aldermen the 17th June.<a id="noteref_1108" name="noteref_1108" href="#note_1108"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1108</span></span></a> A committee had
+already (2 June) to take an account of the plate
+brought in and to enter its true weight in a book.<a id="noteref_1109" name="noteref_1109" href="#note_1109"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1109</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">A further loan of 4,000 marks.</span></div></div>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Letter of thanks from Wolsey, 3 Sept., 1522.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The recent loan of £20,000 had scarcely been
+raised<a id="noteref_1110" name="noteref_1110" href="#note_1110"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1110</span></span></a> before the citizens found it necessary to make
+a further advance of 4,000 marks. Their liberality
+was repaid by a gracious letter from Wolsey himself,
+in which he promised to see the money repaid in a
+fortnight,<a id="noteref_1111" name="noteref_1111" href="#note_1111"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1111</span></span></a> and to extend to them his favour. What
+vexed the citizens more than anything was being
+compelled to make oath before the cardinal's deputy
+sitting in the Chapter House of St. Paul's as to the
+amount each was worth in money, plate, jewels,
+household goods and merchandise,—a system of
+inquisition recently introduced.<a id="noteref_1112" name="noteref_1112" href="#note_1112"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1112</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The City makes a stand against further loans. Nov., 1522.</span></div></div>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Others follow its example.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">As if all this were not enough Wolsey demanded
+another loan before the end of the year. This was
+too much even for the patient and open-handed<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page370">[pg 370]</span><a name="Pg370" id="Pg370" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+London burgess. The Common Council determined
+(4 Nov.) to put a stop to these extortionate demands,
+and resolved that, "As touchyng the Requeste made
+by my lorde cardynalles grace for appreste or
+aloone of more money to the kynges grace, they
+can in no wise agre thereto, but they ar and wilbe
+well contendid to be examyned uppon their othes
+yf it shall please his grace so to do."<a id="noteref_1113" name="noteref_1113" href="#note_1113"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1113</span></span></a> The stand
+thus made by the citizens against illegal exactions
+gave courage to others. The king's commissioners
+were forcibly driven out of Kent, and open rebellion
+was threatened in other counties.<a id="noteref_1114" name="noteref_1114" href="#note_1114"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1114</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Appeal to parliament, April, 1523.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">There was only one course left open to Henry,
+and that was to summon a parliament. For nearly
+eight years no parliament had sat. It was now
+summoned to meet on the 15th April, 1523, not at
+Westminster, but at the house of the Blackfriars.<a id="noteref_1115" name="noteref_1115" href="#note_1115"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1115</span></span></a>
+The names of the city's representatives are on record.
+The aldermen elected one of their body, George
+Monoux, and with him was associated "according
+to ancient customs," the city's Recorder, William
+Shelley; whilst the commons elected John Hewster,
+a mercer, and William Roche, a draper<a id="noteref_1116" name="noteref_1116" href="#note_1116"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1116</span></span></a></p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">A few days after the election a committee of
+fourteen members was nominated to consider what
+matters should be laid before parliament as being for
+the welfare of the city.<a id="noteref_1117" name="noteref_1117" href="#note_1117"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1117</span></span></a> Sir Thomas More was<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page371">[pg 371]</span><a name="Pg371" id="Pg371" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc205" id="toc205"></a>
+chosen Speaker. The enormous sum of £800,000
+was demanded. Expecting some hesitation on the
+part of the Commons, Wolsey himself determined to
+argue with them, and suddenly made his appearance
+in state. Finding that his speech was received in grim
+silence, he turned to More for a reply. The Speaker,
+falling on his knees, declared his inability to make
+any answer until he had received the instructions of
+the House, and intimated that perhaps the silence of
+the Commons was due to the cardinal's presence.
+Wolsey accordingly departed discomforted.<a id="noteref_1118" name="noteref_1118" href="#note_1118"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1118</span></span></a> His
+attempt to overawe parliament marks the beginning
+of his downfall. He still kept well with the city,
+however, and rendered it several small services.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The City and Wolsey, 1523.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Emboldened by their recent success the citizens
+determined to make a stand against other exactions,
+and when in May, 1523, another demand was made
+for one hundred bowmen, as in the previous year,
+they sent their charter to the cardinal and begged
+that the article touching citizens not being liable to
+foreign service might remain in force. A similar
+demand was made in the following November, and
+again the assistance of Wolsey was called in.<a id="noteref_1119" name="noteref_1119" href="#note_1119"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1119</span></span></a> The
+City on the other hand had recently conferred a
+favour on the cardinal by discharging Robert Amadas,
+his own goldsmith, from serving as alderman when
+elected in March of this year.<a id="noteref_1120" name="noteref_1120" href="#note_1120"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1120</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The king and queen of Denmark in the city.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">In June the king and queen of Denmark paid a
+visit to the city and attended mass at St. Paul's,<a id="noteref_1121" name="noteref_1121" href="#note_1121"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1121</span></span></a><span class="tei tei-pb" id="page372">[pg 372]</span><a name="Pg372" id="Pg372" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc206" id="toc206"></a>
+when the Court of Aldermen made them a present of
+two hogsheads of wine, one of white and another of
+claret, and two "awmes" of Rhenish wine, two fresh
+salmon, a dozen great pike, four dozen of "torchettes,"
+and eight dozen of "syses."<a id="noteref_1122" name="noteref_1122" href="#note_1122"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1122</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">England invaded by the Scots. 1523.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The joint attack of Henry and the emperor
+against France in 1523 proved as great a failure as
+that of 1522. In the midst of the campaign Henry
+was threatened with danger nearer home. The Scots
+marched southward, and created such a panic in the
+city that a solemn procession, in which figured
+Cuthbert Tunstal, Bishop of London (successor to the
+unfortunate Fitz-James), the mayor and aldermen, all
+the king's justices, and all the sergeants-at-law, took
+place every day for a week.<a id="noteref_1123" name="noteref_1123" href="#note_1123"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1123</span></span></a> After a futile attack
+upon Wark Castle the invaders withdrew and all
+danger was over.<a id="noteref_1124" name="noteref_1124" href="#note_1124"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1124</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Monoux refuses to accept the mayoralty a second time, Oct., 1523.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">When the Feast of St. Edward (13 Oct.) came
+round, George Monoux, alderman and draper, who
+had already (1514-15) once filled the office of mayor
+of the city, was re-elected; but refusing to accept the
+call of his fellow-citizens he was fined £1,000. It
+was thereupon declared by the Court of Aldermen
+that anyone who in future should be elected mayor,
+and refused to take up office, should be mulcted in a
+like sum.<a id="noteref_1125" name="noteref_1125" href="#note_1125"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1125</span></span></a> Monoux's fine was remitted the following
+year, and he was discharged from attendance,
+although keeping his aldermanry, on account of ill
+health. In return for this favour he made over to the<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page373">[pg 373]</span><a name="Pg373" id="Pg373" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc207" id="toc207"></a>
+Corporation his brewhouse situate near the Bridgehouse
+in Southwark.<a id="noteref_1126" name="noteref_1126" href="#note_1126"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1126</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The king pledges himself to repay the City loan of £20,000.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Before the close of the year (3 Dec., 1523) the
+king pledged himself by letters patent to repay the
+loan of £20,000 which the City had advanced for his
+defence of the realm and maintenance of the wars
+against France and Scotland.<a id="noteref_1127" name="noteref_1127" href="#note_1127"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1127</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Formation of a league against France.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The disappointment experienced by Wolsey in
+not being selected to fill the Papal chair on the death
+of Adrian VI induced him to take measures for transferring
+his master's power from the imperial court
+to the court of France. In the meantime a league
+was formed between Henry, the emperor, and Charles,
+Duke of Bourbon, for the conquest and partition of
+France. During the formation of this league some
+correspondence between England and the Continent
+appears to have been lost in a remarkable manner, to
+judge from the following proclamation,<a id="noteref_1128" name="noteref_1128" href="#note_1128"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1128</span></span></a> made the
+10th July, 1524:—</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Proclamation for the recovery of lost letters, 10 July, 1524.</span></div></div>
+
+<div class="block tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.80em; margin-left: 3.60em; margin-top: 1.80em; margin-right: 3.60em"><span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-size: 90%; font-style: italic">"My lorde the maire streitly chargith and commaundith
+on the king or soveraigne lordis behalf that
+if any maner of person or persons that have founde a
+hat with certeyn lettres and other billes and writinges
+therin enclosed which lettres been directed to o</span><span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-size: 90%; font-style: italic; vertical-align: super">r</span></span><span style="font-size: 90%; font-style: italic"> said
+soveraigne lorde from the parties of beyond the see let
+hym or theym bryng the said hat lettres and writinges
+unto my said lorde the maire in all the hast possible and
+they shalbe well rewarded for their labour and that no
+maner of person kepe the said hat lettres and writinges
+nor noon of them after this proclamacioun made uppon
+payn of deth and God save the king."</span></span></div>
+
+<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page374">[pg 374]</span><a name="Pg374" id="Pg374" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The king of France made prisoner at Pavia, 24 Feb., 1525.</span></div></div>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Rejoicing in the city.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The news of the defeat and capture of the
+French king at Pavia (24 Feb., 1525) was hailed by
+Henry with great delight. The crown of France was
+now, he thought, within his grasp. On Saturday, the
+11th March, a triumph was made in the city to
+celebrate "the takynge of the Frenche kyng in
+Bataill by Themporer and his alies."<a id="noteref_1129" name="noteref_1129" href="#note_1129"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1129</span></span></a> Bonfires
+were lighted at different places, one being in Saint
+Paul's Churchyard near the house where lay the
+foreign ambassadors. The Chamberlain was ordered
+to provide a hogshead of wine at every fire. The
+city minstrels filled the air with music, and the parish
+clerks attended with their singing children, who sat
+about the bonfires and sang ballads and "other
+delectable and joyfull songs." On the Sunday
+following the king and queen and officers of state
+attended a <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Te Deum</span></span> at St. Paul's, the legate himself
+pronouncing the benediction.<a id="noteref_1130" name="noteref_1130" href="#note_1130"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1130</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The Amicable Loan, 1525.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Henry's first impulse was to take advantage of
+the French king's misfortune; the cardinal, on the
+other hand, saw danger in the predominating influence
+of Charles in Europe, and would gladly have seen his
+master join hands with Francis against the emperor.
+He was nevertheless bound to carry out the king's
+wishes as if they were his own, and money was
+necessary for the purpose. Instead of resorting to
+a benevolence—a mode of raising money already
+declared by parliament to be illegal—he suggested
+that the people should be asked for what was called
+an Amicable Loan, on the old feudal ground that
+the king was about to lead an expedition in person.<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page375">[pg 375]</span><a name="Pg375" id="Pg375" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc208" id="toc208"></a>
+The citizens were among the first to whom Wolsey
+made application. Were they of opinion, he asked,
+that the king should undertake the expedition to
+France in person? If so, he could not go otherwise
+than beseemed a prince, and this he could not do
+without the city's aid. The sum they were asked to
+subscribe did not, he said, amount to half their substance,
+which the king might very well have demanded.
+When it was objected that trade had been bad,
+Wolsey lost his temper and declared that it was
+better that some citizens should suffer rather than
+that the king should be in want, and that if they
+refused to pay it might "fortune to cost some their
+heddes."<a id="noteref_1131" name="noteref_1131" href="#note_1131"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1131</span></span></a> At length the citizens agreed to grant
+the king a sixth part of their substance, which Henry
+graciously acknowledged by letter (25 April),<a id="noteref_1132" name="noteref_1132" href="#note_1132"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1132</span></span></a> saying
+that it was not his wish to overburden them, for he
+valued their prosperity more than ten such realms as
+France. The letter was read, by Wolsey's express
+wish, to the Common Council on the 28th, when it
+was agreed to ask for a fortnight's grace before
+sending an answer to so important a missive.<a id="noteref_1133" name="noteref_1133" href="#note_1133"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1133</span></span></a> A
+deputation was forthwith despatched to Hampton
+Court to solicit the cardinal's mediation, but not
+being able to obtain an interview they returned, and
+steps were taken to raise the money required.</p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">When the cardinal was informed later on that
+the alderman of each ward was holding an enquiry as
+to the means of the inhabitants he affected to be very
+angry. "They had no right to examine anyone," he
+said; "I am your commissioner, I will examine you<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page376">[pg 376]</span><a name="Pg376" id="Pg376" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+one by one myself." The mayor (Sir William
+Bailey) thereupon threw himself at the cardinal's feet
+beseeching him that since it was by Act of Common
+Council that the aldermen had sat in their respective
+wards for the purpose of taking the benevolence—a
+procedure which he now perceived to be against the
+law—the Act should by the Common Council be revoked.
+"Well," said Wolsey "I am content," and he
+then proceeded to ask how much the mayor and
+aldermen then present were prepared to give. When
+the mayor incautiously remarked that if he made any
+promise there and then it might perhaps cost him his
+life, Wolsey again became furious. What! the mayor's
+life threatened for obeying the king's orders! He
+would see to that.</p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">In the country the loan met with so much
+opposition that a rebellion was feared. At length,
+finding it was impossible to collect the money, Wolsey
+sent (19 May) for the mayor and aldermen and
+informed them that the king had given up all
+thoughts of his expedition to France, and that they
+were pardoned of all that had been demanded of
+them.<a id="noteref_1134" name="noteref_1134" href="#note_1134"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1134</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">A truce between England and France.</span></div></div>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">French ambassadors lodged in the city, 1527.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Before many weeks elapsed Wolsey saw with
+satisfaction a truce made between Henry and the
+queen regent of France.<a id="noteref_1135" name="noteref_1135" href="#note_1135"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1135</span></span></a> Early in 1526 the French
+king regained his liberty by virtue of a treaty which
+he at once repudiated, and war between him and the
+emperor was renewed, but England remained virtually
+at peace. In the following year (1527) the cardinal<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page377">[pg 377]</span><a name="Pg377" id="Pg377" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc209" id="toc209"></a>
+himself paid a visit to the French king and superintended
+the drawing up of articles for a permanent
+peace. By September all was settled, and Wolsey
+returned to England. Ambassadors from France
+shortly afterwards arrived, and were lodged in the
+Bishop of London's palace in St. Paul's Churchyard.
+The City made them valuable presents at the
+instance of the lord cardinal.<a id="noteref_1136" name="noteref_1136" href="#note_1136"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1136</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Troubles over Wythypol's election as alderman, 1527-1528.</span></div></div>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Wythypol again summoned to take office.</span></div></div>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Committed to Newgate, 6 Feb., 1528.</span></div></div>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Again summoned to take office, 22 May.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The election of Paul Wythypol,<a id="noteref_1137" name="noteref_1137" href="#note_1137"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1137</span></span></a> a merchant-tailor,
+as alderman of the Ward of Farringdon Within,
+in 1527, again brought Henry and the citizens into
+variance. The king desired Wythypol's discharge, at
+least for a time. The Court of Aldermen hesitated
+to accede to the request and consulted Wolsey.<a id="noteref_1138" name="noteref_1138" href="#note_1138"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1138</span></span></a> He
+recommended them an interview with the king at
+Greenwich. To Greenwich they accordingly went
+(24 Feb.) by water, where they arrived in time to
+give a formal reception to the cardinal, who landed
+soon afterwards from his barge. After a few words
+had passed between the cardinal and the municipal
+officers, the former entered the palace, whilst the
+latter waited in the king's great chamber till dinner
+time. When that hour arrived they were bidden to go
+down to the hall, where the mayor was entertained<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page378">[pg 378]</span><a name="Pg378" id="Pg378" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+at the lord steward's mess, and the aldermen received
+like attention from the comptroller and other officers
+of state. The city's Counsel who had accompanied
+the mayor and aldermen were entertained at the
+table of "master coferer." Dinner over, the company
+returned to the great chamber, where they
+were kept waiting till the evening. At length the
+mayor and aldermen were bidden to the king's
+presence in his secret chamber. What took place
+there the writer of the record declares himself unable
+to say,<a id="noteref_1139" name="noteref_1139" href="#note_1139"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1139</span></span></a> and, although the mayor afterwards made a
+report of the matter to the court, no particulars are
+recorded in the City's archives. The practical outcome
+of the interview appears to have been that
+Wythypol was left unmolested for a whole twelve-month.
+When that time had elapsed he was again
+summoned before the Court of Aldermen either to
+accept office or take the oath prescribed.<a id="noteref_1140" name="noteref_1140" href="#note_1140"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1140</span></span></a> Refusing
+both these propositions he was committed to Newgate.<a id="noteref_1141" name="noteref_1141" href="#note_1141"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1141</span></span></a>
+This took place on the 6th February, 1528. On the
+3rd March he appeared in person before the Court of
+Aldermen and desired a respite from office, or to be
+allowed to pay a fine. Being asked the amount of
+fine he was prepared to pay, he offered £40, and at
+the same time asked to be discharged from office for
+a period of three years. This offer was declined,
+and Wythypol was again ordered to take the oath
+prescribed for his discharge.<a id="noteref_1142" name="noteref_1142" href="#note_1142"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1142</span></span></a> Nearly three months
+were allowed to elapse before any further steps
+were taken, when, on the 22nd May, the court<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page379">[pg 379]</span><a name="Pg379" id="Pg379" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc210" id="toc210"></a>
+again ordered Wythypol to appear at its next
+meeting, and to take up office, or else take the
+oath, or pay such fine as should be assessed by the
+mayor, aldermen and common council.<a id="noteref_1143" name="noteref_1143" href="#note_1143"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1143</span></span></a> It is
+certain that he did not take office, so the conclusion
+must be that he availed himself of one or other of
+the alternatives open to him. John Brown was
+elected alderman of Farringdon Within shortly afterwards,
+but he was discharged by the Common
+Council, and the aldermanry was subsequently filled
+by John Hardy being translated to it from Aldersgate
+Ward.<a id="noteref_1144" name="noteref_1144" href="#note_1144"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1144</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">A great dearth in the city, 1529.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">In addition to an epidemic of sickness,<a id="noteref_1145" name="noteref_1145" href="#note_1145"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1145</span></span></a> the city
+was threatened the following year with a famine,
+notwithstanding the fact that large quantities of grain
+had been stored up in various parts of the city by
+order of the municipal authorities. The country had
+suffered recently by heavy rains, and large tracts of
+land had been inundated. In anticipation of trouble,
+a large stock of wheat had been laid in, but when it
+came to the point of disposing of it, the bakers of the
+city and the bakers of Stratford-at-Bow declined to
+take it except at their own price, until compelled by
+threats and, in some cases, imprisonment.<a id="noteref_1146" name="noteref_1146" href="#note_1146"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1146</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The legatine court at the Blackfriars, 1529.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">For some years past Henry had been meditating
+a divorce from Catherine of Aragon, his brother's
+widow, but it was not until 1529 that the assent of
+the Pope was at last obtained to try the validity of
+the marriage. The legatine court sat in the city at<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page380">[pg 380]</span><a name="Pg380" id="Pg380" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+the house of the Blackfriars, where every arrangement
+was made to add dignity to the proceedings. At its
+head sat the two cardinals, Campeggio and Wolsey,
+on chairs covered with cloth of gold, and on their
+right sat Henry himself.<a id="noteref_1147" name="noteref_1147" href="#note_1147"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1147</span></span></a> The sudden suspension of
+all proceedings after the court had sat for some weeks,
+and the revocation of the cause to the Court of Rome,
+led to Wolsey's downfall. In October the seals were
+taken from him and given to Sir Thomas More, his
+furniture and plate were seized, and he himself ordered
+to remove from London.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The lord mayor's banquet, 28 Oct., 1529.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">A few days after Wolsey's disgrace a banquet
+was held at the Guildhall on the occasion of the
+swearing in of Ralph Dodmer, the newly-elected
+mayor. It is the first lord mayor's banquet of which
+any particulars have come down to us, and they are
+interesting as recording the names of the chief guests.
+The mayor's court, the scene of the feast, was
+boarded and hung with cloth of Arras for the occasion.
+One table was set apart for peers of the realm, at the
+head of which sat the new lord chancellor and at the
+bottom the lords Berkeley and Powis. At either side of
+the table sat nine peers, among whom were the dukes
+of Norfolk and Suffolk, the one being the treasurer and
+the other the marshal of England, Sir Thomas Grey,
+Marquis of Dorset, the Earl of Oxford, high chamberlain,
+and the Earl of Shrewsbury, lord steward of
+England, Tunstal, Bishop of London, Sir Thomas
+Boleyn, Lord Rochford, whose daughter Anne was
+shortly to experience the peril of sharing Henry's
+throne, Lord Audley, and others. At two other<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page381">[pg 381]</span><a name="Pg381" id="Pg381" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc211" id="toc211"></a>
+tables, placed between the court of orphans and the
+mayor's court, were entertained a number of knights
+and other gentlemen, whose names are not recorded.<a id="noteref_1148" name="noteref_1148" href="#note_1148"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1148</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The fall of Wolsey, 1529-1530.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">It was not long before further proceedings were
+taken against the king's late minister. On the 3rd
+November (1529), after the lapse of six years, parliament
+met in the city at the palace of Bridewell.
+The City was represented by Thomas Seymer, an
+alderman and ex-mayor, John Baker, the City's Recorder,
+John Petyte, grocer, and Paul Wythypol,<a id="noteref_1149" name="noteref_1149" href="#note_1149"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1149</span></span></a> the
+merchant-tailor whose election as alderman had recently
+created no little trouble. Among other members
+was Thomas Cromwell,<a id="noteref_1150" name="noteref_1150" href="#note_1150"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1150</span></span></a> a friend of Wolsey, and destined
+soon to take his place as the king's chief adviser. A
+bill for disabling the cardinal from being restored to
+his former dignities was carried by the Lords and sent
+down to the Commons (1 Dec.). There it is said to
+have met with the strenuous opposition of Cromwell.
+Of this, however, there is some doubt, as it is uncertain
+whether the bill provoked any discussion, parliament
+being shortly afterward prorogued (17 Dec.)
+and the unhappy cardinal left in suspense as to what
+fate was in store for him.<a id="noteref_1151" name="noteref_1151" href="#note_1151"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1151</span></span></a> At Christmas he fell ill,
+and the king's heart became so far softened towards
+his old favourite that early in the following year
+(Feb., 1530) he was restored to the archbishopric of<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page382">[pg 382]</span><a name="Pg382" id="Pg382" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+York with all its possessions except York-place
+(Whitehall) in Westminster, which Henry could not
+bring himself to surrender. His colleges were seized;
+the college he had founded at Ipswich was sold; but
+his college at Oxford, known as Cardinal College, was
+afterwards re-established under the name of Christ
+Church. He himself was not allowed to rest long in
+peace. He was summoned to London on a charge of
+treason, for which there was little or no foundation,
+but the troubles of the last two years had rendered
+him so infirm that he died on the way.</p>
+</div>
+</div>
+
+<hr class="doublepage" /><div class="tei tei-div" style="margin-bottom: 5.00em; margin-top: 5.00em">
+<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page383">[pg 383]</span><a name="Pg383" id="Pg383" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+<a name="toc212" id="toc212"></a>
+<a name="pdf213" id="pdf213"></a>
+<h1 class="tei tei-head" style="text-align: left; margin-bottom: 3.46em; margin-top: 3.46em"><span style="font-size: 173%">CHAPTER XIV.</span></h1>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-div" style="margin-bottom: 4.00em; margin-top: 4.00em">
+<a name="toc214" id="toc214"></a><h2 class="tei tei-head" style="text-align: left; margin-bottom: 2.88em; margin-top: 2.88em"></h2>
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The House of Commons and the Clergy, 1529.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Although Wolsey was no more, his works followed
+him. He it was, and not Henry, who first conceived
+the idea of church reform, towards which some steps
+had been taken in Wolsey's lifetime. It was left for
+Henry to carry out the design of his great minister.
+When the king laid his hand on the monasteries, he
+only followed the example set by the cardinal in 1525,
+when some of the smaller religious houses in Kent,
+Sussex and Essex were suppressed for his great foundation
+of Oxford. To assist him in carrying out his design
+he turned to parliament. Relieved as they now were
+of the oppression of the great nobles, the Commons
+were ready to use their newly-acquired independence
+against the clergy, who exacted extravagant fees and misused
+the powers of the ecclesiastical courts. Acts were
+passed regulating the payment of mortuary fees and
+the fees for probate, whilst another Act restricted the
+holding of pluralities and the taking of ferms by church-men.<a id="noteref_1152" name="noteref_1152" href="#note_1152"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1152</span></span></a>
+The clergy threatened to appeal to Rome,
+but were warned that such action would be met
+with pains and penalties as opposed to the royal
+prerogative.<a id="noteref_1153" name="noteref_1153" href="#note_1153"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1153</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Disputes touching tithes payable to city clergy, 1527-1534.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">In the city the question of tithes payable to the
+clergy had been always more or less a vexed question.
+Before the commencement of the thirteenth century
+the city clergy had been supported by casual dues in<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page384">[pg 384]</span><a name="Pg384" id="Pg384" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+addition to their glebe land. These casual payments
+were originally personal, but subsequently became
+regulated by the amount of rent paid by parishioners
+for their houses. A question arose as to whether the
+citizens were also liable to pay personal tithes on
+their gains, and it was eventually decided that they
+were so liable.<a id="noteref_1154" name="noteref_1154" href="#note_1154"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1154</span></span></a></p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">On the 31st August, 1527, a committee, which
+had been specially appointed to enquire into matters
+concerning the city's welfare, reported, among other
+things, upon the tithe question as it then stood in the
+city.<a id="noteref_1155" name="noteref_1155" href="#note_1155"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1155</span></span></a> The "curates," they said, had purchased a
+Bull of Pope Nicholas, on the 6th August, 1453, and
+this Bull had been confirmed by Act of Common
+Council on the 3rd March, 1475. Not only was the
+amount of the tithe payable fixed by the Bull, but the
+Bull itself was to be publicly read by the curates four
+times a year, so that no doubt should exist in the minds
+of the parishioners. This the curates had failed to do,
+and had caused their parishioners heavy legal expenses
+in disputing demands for tithes. One man was known
+to have spent as much as £100 in his own defence.
+The committee suggested that the whole question
+should be referred to the Bishop of London, and that
+a translation of the Bull should be exhibited in every
+church. The citizens were the more aggrieved because
+many parsonages and vicarages were let to ferm.<a id="noteref_1156" name="noteref_1156" href="#note_1156"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1156</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The curates' book of articles.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The curates made their defence in a book of
+eighteen articles touching tithes and other oblations,<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page385">[pg 385]</span><a name="Pg385" id="Pg385" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc215" id="toc215"></a>
+the chief point being that every householder, time out
+of mind, had been bound to pay to God and the
+Church one farthing out of every 10<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">s.</span></span> of rent, a half-penny
+out of 20<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">s.</span></span> and so forth, on 100 days of the
+year; amounting in all to 2<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">s.</span></span> 1<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">d.</span></span> for every 10<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">s.</span></span> rent
+<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">per annum</span></span>. This manner of payment proving tedious,
+the curates and their parishioners came to an agreement
+that 1<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">s.</span></span> 2<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">d.</span></span> should be paid on every 6<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">s.</span></span> 8<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">d.</span></span>
+or noble, and this sum the curates had been receiving
+time out of mind, none reclaiming or denying. But,
+inasmuch as this payment by occupiers of houses was
+only ordained for a "dowry" to the parish churches
+of London which had no glebe lands, the curates
+demanded that all merchants and artificers, with other
+occupiers of the city, should pay personal tithes of
+their "lucre or encrece" according to the common
+law, and as "well conscyoned" men had been in the
+habit of paying in times past.<a id="noteref_1157" name="noteref_1157" href="#note_1157"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1157</span></span></a> The book of articles
+was laid before the Court of Common Council on
+the 16th February, 1528, by Robert Carter and six
+other priests, on behalf of their entire body. On
+the following 16th March the Court of Aldermen
+for themselves agreed to pay tithe at the forthcoming
+Easter according to the Bull of Pope Nicholas, and
+not after the rate of 1<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">s.</span></span> 2<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">d.</span></span> on the noble,<a id="noteref_1158" name="noteref_1158" href="#note_1158"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1158</span></span></a> whilst
+four days later the Common Council decided that,
+for the sake of convenience, bills should be posted
+in every parish church within the city showing
+the number of offering days (viz., eighty-two) and
+the amount to be offered by inhabitants of the
+city.<a id="noteref_1159" name="noteref_1159" href="#note_1159"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1159</span></span></a></p>
+
+<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page386">[pg 386]</span><a name="Pg386" id="Pg386" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">So matters continued until, early in 1534, it was
+agreed to submit the whole question to the lord
+chancellor and other members of the council, who
+made their award a few days before Easter.<a id="noteref_1160" name="noteref_1160" href="#note_1160"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1160</span></span></a> It
+decreed that at the forthcoming festival every subject
+should pay to the parson or curate of his parish after
+the rate of 2<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">s.</span></span> 9<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">d.</span></span> in the pound, and 16 pence
+half-penny in the half-pound, and that every man's
+wife, servant, child and apprentice receiving the
+Holy Sacrament should pay two pence. These payments
+were to continue to be paid "without grudge
+or murmur" until such time as the council should
+arrive at a final settlement.<a id="noteref_1161" name="noteref_1161" href="#note_1161"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1161</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Elsing Spital and Holy Trinity Priory surrendered to the king, 1530-1531.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">In the meanwhile the city had been made to
+feel the heavy hand of the king and of his new
+minister, Thomas Cromwell. In May, 1530, Elsing
+Spital, a house established by William Elsing, a
+charitable mercer, for the relief of the blind, but
+which had subsequently grown into a priory of
+Augustinian canons of wealth and position, was confiscated
+by the Crown. What became of the blind
+inmates is not known. In the following year (1531)
+the Priory of Holy Trinity, Aldgate, shared the same
+fate. The priory had existed since the time of
+Henry I and the "good queen" Matilda,<a id="noteref_1162" name="noteref_1162" href="#note_1162"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1162</span></span></a> and its
+prior enjoyed the singular distinction of being <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">ex</span><span class="tei tei-pb" id="page387">[pg 387]</span><a name="Pg387" id="Pg387" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc216" id="toc216"></a><span style="font-style: italic">
+officio</span></span> an alderman of the city. The canons were
+now removed to another place and the building and
+site bestowed by Henry upon his chancellor, Sir
+Thomas Audley.<a id="noteref_1163" name="noteref_1163" href="#note_1163"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1163</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The Great Beam reconveyed to the City after the lapse of ten years, 1531.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Between 1531 and 1534 the City enjoyed some
+respite from attack. It even recovered some of its
+lost privileges. In 1521 Henry had deprived the
+City of its right to the Great Beam, and of the issues
+and profits derived from it, and had caused a conveyance
+of it to be made to Sir William Sidney.
+In 1531 the beam was re-conveyed to the City.<a id="noteref_1164" name="noteref_1164" href="#note_1164"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1164</span></span></a> The
+Grocers' Company were scarcely less interested in
+the beam than the City, for to them was deputed the
+choice of weighers, who were afterwards admitted
+and sworn before the Court of Aldermen. Both the
+City and the company used their best endeavours to
+recover their lost rights, the former going so far as
+to sanction the distribution of the sum of £23 6<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">s.</span></span> 8<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">d.</span></span>
+between the king's sergeant, the king's attorney, and
+one "Lumnore,"<a id="noteref_1165" name="noteref_1165" href="#note_1165"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1165</span></span></a> a servant of "my lady Anne,"<a id="noteref_1166" name="noteref_1166" href="#note_1166"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1166</span></span></a> with
+the view of gaining their object the easier.<a id="noteref_1167" name="noteref_1167" href="#note_1167"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1167</span></span></a> A compromise
+was subsequently effected by which Sir
+William Sidney continued to hold the beam at an
+annual rent payable to the City,<a id="noteref_1168" name="noteref_1168" href="#note_1168"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1168</span></span></a> until, in 1531, he<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page388">[pg 388]</span><a name="Pg388" id="Pg388" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+consented to a surrender, and it became again vested
+in the Corporation.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Feeling in the city at Henry's marriage with Anne Boleyn, 1533.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Finding it hopeless to obtain the Pope's sanction
+to his divorce from Catherine, Henry at last lost
+all patience, and on the 25th January, 1533, was
+privately married to Anne Boleyn. The match was
+unpopular with the citizens, who took occasion of a
+sermon preached on Easter-day to show their dissatisfaction.
+According to Chapuys, the Spanish
+ambassador, who sent an account of the affair to the
+emperor, the greater part of the congregation got up
+and left the church when prayers were desired for the
+queen. When Henry heard of the insult thus offered
+to his new bride he was furious, and forthwith sent
+word to the mayor to see that no such manifestation
+should occur again. Thereupon, continues Chapuys,
+the mayor summoned the guilds to assemble in their
+various halls and commanded them to cease murmuring
+against the king's marriage on pain of
+incurring the royal displeasure, and to order their
+own journeymen and servants, "and, a still more
+difficult task, their own wives," to refrain from
+speaking disparagingly about the queen.<a id="noteref_1169" name="noteref_1169" href="#note_1169"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1169</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The queen's passage from the Tower to Westminster, 31 May, 1533.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">It was perhaps on this account that the civic
+authorities excelled themselves in giving the queen a
+suitable reception as she passed from the Tower to
+Westminster on the 31st May. The Court of Aldermen
+directed (14 May) the wardens of the Haberdashers
+to prepare their barge as well as the "bachelers"
+barge for the occasion. Three pageants were to be
+set up, one in Leadenhall and the others at the<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page389">[pg 389]</span><a name="Pg389" id="Pg389" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc217" id="toc217"></a>
+Standard and the little Conduit in Cheapside. The
+Standard was to run with wine. A deputation was
+appointed to wait upon the king's council to learn its
+wishes, and enquiry was to be made of the Duke of
+Norfolk whether the clergy should take part in the
+day's proceedings, and whether the merchants of the
+Steelyard or other strangers should be allowed to
+erect pageants.<a id="noteref_1170" name="noteref_1170" href="#note_1170"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1170</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The City's gift of 1,000 marks.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The Court of Common Council had on the previous
+day (13 May) voted a gift of 1,000 marks to
+be presented to the queen at her coronation, and a
+further sum to be expended in the city "for the honor
+of the same."<a id="noteref_1171" name="noteref_1171" href="#note_1171"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1171</span></span></a> Catherine of Aragon and Anne Boleyn
+were the only queens of king Henry VIII who were
+crowned, and on both occasions the citizens of London
+performed the customary services.<a id="noteref_1172" name="noteref_1172" href="#note_1172"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1172</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The Act of Succession, 1534.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">In September (1533) Anne gave birth to a
+daughter, who afterwards ascended the throne as
+Queen Elizabeth. In the following spring (1534)
+parliament passed an Act of Succession, which not
+only declared Elizabeth (and not Mary, the king's
+daughter by Catherine of Aragon) heir to the crown,
+but required all subjects to take an oath acknowledging
+the succession. Commissioners were appointed
+to tender the oath to the citizens,<a id="noteref_1173" name="noteref_1173" href="#note_1173"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1173</span></span></a> and by the 20th
+April the "most part of the city was sworn to the<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page390">[pg 390]</span><a name="Pg390" id="Pg390" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+"king and his legitimate issue by the queen's grace
+now had and hereafter to come."<a id="noteref_1174" name="noteref_1174" href="#note_1174"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1174</span></span></a> A fortnight later
+deeds under the common seals of the livery companies
+"concernyng the suretye state and succession" of
+the king were delivered to Henry in person at Greenwich
+by a deputation of aldermen.<a id="noteref_1175" name="noteref_1175" href="#note_1175"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1175</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Proceedings against those objecting to subscribe to the Act of Succession.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The oath, nevertheless, met with much opposition,
+more especially among the clergy and the religious
+orders. Elizabeth Barton, known as the "holy maid
+of Kent," and some of her followers, among them
+being Henry Gold, rector of the church of St. Mary
+Aldermary, were executed at Tyburn for daring to
+speak against the king's marriage.<a id="noteref_1176" name="noteref_1176" href="#note_1176"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1176</span></span></a> The friars proved
+extremely obstinate, and Henry sent commissioners
+to seek out and suppress all those friaries that refused
+to submit.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The monks of the Charterhouse, 1534-1535.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The inmates of the London Charterhouse, who
+might well have been left to enjoy their quiet seclusion
+from the world, were startled by a visit from the king's
+commissioners calling upon them to take the oath.
+The manner of their reception by John Houghton,
+the prior, and his brethren and subsequent proceedings
+are graphically described by Maurice Chauncy,<a id="noteref_1177" name="noteref_1177" href="#note_1177"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1177</span></span></a> one<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page391">[pg 391]</span><a name="Pg391" id="Pg391" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc218" id="toc218"></a>
+of the inmates, who was more compliant than his
+brethren to the king's wishes, and thereby saved his
+life. The prior and Humphrey Middlemore, the procurator
+of the convent, were committed to the Tower
+for counselling opposition to the commissioners. There
+they were visited by the Archbishop of York and the
+Bishop of London, who persuaded them at last that
+the question of the succession was not a cause in
+which to sacrifice their lives for conscience sake. The
+result was that after a while Houghton and his companion
+declared their willingness to submit. On the
+29th May the commissioners received oaths of fealty
+from Prior Houghton and five other monks, and on
+the 6th June Bishop Lee and Sir Thomas Kitson,
+one of the sheriffs, received similar oaths from a
+number of priests, professed monks and lay brethren
+or <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">conversi</span></span> belonging to the house.<a id="noteref_1178" name="noteref_1178" href="#note_1178"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1178</span></span></a> The oaths of
+obedience to the Act were given under reservation
+"so far as the law of God permitted," and for a time
+the monks were left in comparative quiet, some few
+of them, of whom Cromwell entertained the most
+hope of submission, being sent, by his direction, to
+the convent of Sion.<a id="noteref_1179" name="noteref_1179" href="#note_1179"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1179</span></span></a></p>
+
+<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page392">[pg 392]</span><a name="Pg392" id="Pg392" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The Act of Supremacy, 1534.</span></div></div>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Execution of Houghton and others, 1535.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The exhortations of the "father confessor" were
+not without some measure of success, several of the
+Carthusians being induced to alter their opinions as to
+the king's demands. The seal of doom, however, was
+fixed on the order by the passing of the Act which called
+upon its members to renounce the Pope and acknowledge
+the royal supremacy.<a id="noteref_1180" name="noteref_1180" href="#note_1180"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1180</span></span></a> Fisher and More denied
+the king's title of Supreme Head of the Church, and
+were committed to the Tower. At this crisis there
+came to London two priors of Carthusian houses
+established, one in Nottinghamshire and the other
+in Lincolnshire. They came to talk over the
+state of affairs with Houghton. An interview
+with Cromwell, recently appointed vicar-general
+or king's vicegerent in matters ecclesiastical, was
+resolved on. The king might possibly be prevailed
+upon to make some abatement in his demands.
+Cromwell, however, no sooner discovered the object
+of their visit than he committed them to the Tower
+as rebels and would-be traitors. As they still refused
+to acknowledge the king's supremacy in the Church,
+in spite of all efforts of persuasion, they were brought
+to trial, together with Father Reynolds of Sion, on a
+charge of treason. A verdict of guilty was, after some
+hesitation on the part of the jury, found against them,
+and they were executed at Tyburn (4 May, 1535),
+glorying in the cause for which they were held worthy
+to suffer death. Houghton's arm was suspended over
+the gateway of the London Charterhouse, in the fond
+hope that the rest of the brethren might be awed
+into submission. This atrocious act of barbarism had,<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page393">[pg 393]</span><a name="Pg393" id="Pg393" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc219" id="toc219"></a>
+however, precisely the opposite effect to that desired.
+The monks were more resolute than ever not to
+submit, and not even a personal visit of Henry himself
+could turn them from their purpose.<a id="noteref_1181" name="noteref_1181" href="#note_1181"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1181</span></span></a> Three of
+them were thereupon committed to prison, where
+they were compelled to stand in an upright position
+for thirteen days, chained from their necks to their arms
+and with their legs fettered.<a id="noteref_1182" name="noteref_1182" href="#note_1182"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1182</span></span></a> They were afterwards
+brought to trial on a charge of treason, convicted and
+executed (19 June).</p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The fate of the remaining monks is soon told.
+In May, 1537, the royal commissioners once more
+attended at the Charterhouse, when they found
+the majority of its inmates prepared to take the oath
+prescribed. Ten of them, however, still refused, and
+were committed to Newgate and there left to be
+"dispatched by the hand of God," in other words to
+meet a painful and lingering death from fever and
+starvation. The following month the remnant of the
+community made their submission, and the London
+Charterhouse, as a monastic institution, ceased to
+exist.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Execution of Fisher and More, 1535.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Fisher and More were now brought from the
+Tower, where they had lain six months and more,
+and convicted on a similar charge of treason. Their
+sentence was commuted to death by beheading. Fisher
+was the first to suffer (19 June, 1535). His head was
+set up on London Bridge and his body buried in the
+churchyard of All Hallows, Barking. More suffered
+a few weeks later (6 July). His head, too, was placed
+on London Bridge, but his body was buried in the<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page394">[pg 394]</span><a name="Pg394" id="Pg394" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+Tower, whither the remains of Fisher were afterwards
+carried. On the 15th December the Court of Aldermen
+publicly condemned a sermon preached by Fisher
+"in derogation and diminution of the royal estate of
+the king's majesty."<a id="noteref_1183" name="noteref_1183" href="#note_1183"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1183</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The Pilgrimage of Grace, 1536.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">When, in the following year (1536), the smaller
+monasteries—those of less than £200 a year—were
+dissolved by Act of Parliament, and the inhabitants
+of Lincolnshire and Yorkshire, taking fright lest the
+king and Cromwell should proceed to despoil the
+parish churches, set out on the Pilgrimage of Grace,
+Henry sought the City's aid. On the 10th October a
+letter from the king was read before the Court of
+Aldermen, desiring them to dispatch forthwith to his
+manor of Ampthill, where the nobles were about to
+wait upon his majesty, a contingent of at least 250
+armed men, 200 of which were to be well horsed, and
+100 to be archers.<a id="noteref_1184" name="noteref_1184" href="#note_1184"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1184</span></span></a> The mayor, Sir John Allen,<a id="noteref_1185" name="noteref_1185" href="#note_1185"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1185</span></span></a> lost no
+time in issuing his precept to the livery companies for
+each of them to furnish a certain number of bowmen
+and billmen, well horsed and arrayed in jackets of
+white bearing the City's arms. They were to muster
+in Moorfields within twenty-four hours. The Mercers
+were called upon to furnish the largest quota, viz.,
+twenty men; the Grocers, Drapers, Tailors and Cloth-workers
+respectively, sixteen men, and the rest of the
+companies contingents varying from twelve to two.<a id="noteref_1186" name="noteref_1186" href="#note_1186"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1186</span></span></a>
+The Court of Aldermen at the same time took<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page395">[pg 395]</span><a name="Pg395" id="Pg395" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc220" id="toc220"></a>
+the precaution of depriving all priests and curates, as
+well as all friars dwelling within the city, of every
+offensive weapon, so that they should be left with
+nothing but their "meate knyves."<a id="noteref_1187" name="noteref_1187" href="#note_1187"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1187</span></span></a> The king sent
+a letter of thanks for the city's contingent.<a id="noteref_1188" name="noteref_1188" href="#note_1188"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1188</span></span></a></p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Later on, when Allen had been succeeded in the
+mayoralty by Sir Ralph Warren,<a id="noteref_1189" name="noteref_1189" href="#note_1189"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1189</span></span></a> it was resolved that
+each member of the court should provide at his own
+cost and charges twenty able men fully equipped in
+case of any emergency that might arise, whilst the
+companies were again called upon to hold men in
+readiness.<a id="noteref_1190" name="noteref_1190" href="#note_1190"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1190</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Henry's marriage with Jane Seymour, May, 1536.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Henry in the meantime had got rid of his second
+wife on the specious ground of her having misconducted
+herself with more than one member of the
+court, the real cause being her miscarriage<a id="noteref_1191" name="noteref_1191" href="#note_1191"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1191</span></span></a> of a male
+child, to the king's bitter disappointment. Henry had
+made up his mind to change his wives until he could
+find one who would give him a male heir and thus
+place the succession to the crown beyond all possibility
+of doubt. The very next day following Anne
+Boleyn's execution he married Jane Seymour. The
+marriage necessitated the calling together of a
+new parliament, when a fresh Act was passed settling<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page396">[pg 396]</span><a name="Pg396" id="Pg396" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+the succession on Jane's children and declaring
+both Mary and Elizabeth illegitimate. Nevertheless,
+as soon as Mary made formal submission to her
+father, the king's attitude towards her, from being
+cold and cruel, changed at once to one of courtesy if
+not of affection. He was thought to entertain the
+idea of declaring her heir-apparent. Indeed, on
+Sunday, the 20th August, she was actually proclaimed
+as such in one of the London churches—no doubt by
+some mistake.<a id="noteref_1192" name="noteref_1192" href="#note_1192"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1192</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Convocation at St. Paul's, 9 June-20 July, 1536.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Whilst parliament was sitting at Westminster
+convocation was gathered at St. Paul's in the city,
+and continued to sit there until the 20th July, presided
+over by Cromwell as the king's vicar-general. The
+meeting was remarkable for its formal decree that
+Henry, as supreme head of the Church, might and
+ought to disregard all citations by the Pope, as well
+as for the promulgation of the ten articles intended
+to promote uniformity of belief and worship.<a id="noteref_1193" name="noteref_1193" href="#note_1193"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1193</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Preparation for the new queen's coronation.</span></div></div>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">She dies in childbed, 24 Oct., 1537.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">In September, 1536, the Court of Common
+Council agreed to vote the same sum of money for
+the coronation of the "right excellent pryncesse lady
+Jane, quene of Englonde," as had been granted at the
+coronation of "dame Anne, late queene of Englonde."<a id="noteref_1194" name="noteref_1194" href="#note_1194"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1194</span></span></a>
+The money, however, was not required, for the new
+queen was never crowned. Just one week after the
+birth of a prince (12 Oct., 1537), afterwards King
+Edward VI, there was a solemn procession of priests
+from every city church, with the Bishop of London,
+the choir of St. Paul's, the mayor, aldermen and<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page397">[pg 397]</span><a name="Pg397" id="Pg397" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc221" id="toc221"></a>
+crafts in their liveries, for the preservation of the
+infant prince and for the health of the queen, who lay
+in a precarious state.<a id="noteref_1195" name="noteref_1195" href="#note_1195"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1195</span></span></a> A few days later (24 Oct.) she
+was dead. The citizens caused her obit to be
+celebrated in St. Paul's with truly regal pomp.<a id="noteref_1196" name="noteref_1196" href="#note_1196"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1196</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Anne of Cleves arrives at Dover, 27 Dec., 1539.</span></div></div>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Her passage through the city, 4 Feb,. 1540.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Two years later the citizens were preparing to
+set out to Greenwich in their barge (the mayor,
+aldermen, and those who had served the office of
+sheriff, in liveries of black velvet with chains of gold
+on their necks, accompanied by their servants in
+coats of russet) to welcome Anne of Cleves, who
+landed at Dover the 27th December, 1539.<a id="noteref_1197" name="noteref_1197" href="#note_1197"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1197</span></span></a> On the
+3rd February, 1540, the Court of Aldermen was
+informed that the king and queen would be leaving
+Greenwich on the morrow for Westminster, and that
+it was the king's wish that the commons of London
+should be in their best apparel, in their barges, to
+wait upon his highness, meeting at St. Dunstan's in
+the East at 7 o'clock in the morning and arriving at
+Greenwich by 8 o'clock.<a id="noteref_1198" name="noteref_1198" href="#note_1198"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1198</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Cromwell's work of demolition in the city, 1537-1538.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The insurrection which had taken place in the
+country under the name of the Pilgrimage of Grace
+was seized by the king as an excuse for suppressing
+many of the larger monasteries and confiscating their
+property. He had no such excuse for carrying out
+his destructive policy in the city. Nevertheless, under
+the immediate supervision of Cromwell, the work of
+suppression went on, and before the end of 1538 was<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page398">[pg 398]</span><a name="Pg398" id="Pg398" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+well nigh complete. The surrender of the houses of
+the Black Friars, the Grey Friars and the White
+Friars followed in quick succession, "and so all the
+other immediatlie."<a id="noteref_1199" name="noteref_1199" href="#note_1199"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1199</span></span></a> Cromwell by this time had
+removed from his house near Fenchurch to another
+near the Austin Friars in Throgmorton Street.
+He had recently asked for a pipe of water to be
+laid on to his new house, and this the Common
+Council had "lovingly" granted.<a id="noteref_1200" name="noteref_1200" href="#note_1200"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1200</span></span></a> In his private
+concerns he showed as little regard for the rights
+of others as in the affairs of State. He did not
+scruple to remove bodily a small house, the property
+of Stow's father, in order to enlarge his own garden,
+giving neither warning beforehand nor explanation
+afterwards, and "no man durst go to argue the
+matter."<a id="noteref_1201" name="noteref_1201" href="#note_1201"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1201</span></span></a></p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The hospital of St. Thomas of Acon, which had
+ministered to the wants of the poorer citizens for
+nearly 400 years, disappeared,<a id="noteref_1202" name="noteref_1202" href="#note_1202"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1202</span></span></a> and was soon followed
+by the priory and hospital of St. Bartholomew, an
+institution of even greater antiquity, the hospital of
+St. Thomas, in Southwark, the priory and hospital of
+St. Mary without Bishopsgate, known as St. Mary of
+Bethlem, or "Bedlam," and the Abbey of Graces or
+New Abbey (sometimes called the Eastminster to
+distinguish it from the other minster in the west of
+London) which had been founded by Edward III,
+near Tower Hill.</p>
+
+<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page399">[pg 399]</span><a name="Pg399" id="Pg399" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc222" id="toc222"></a>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The division of the spoil.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">A portion of the spoil was, as we have already
+seen, distributed among court favourites. The site of
+the house and gardens of the Augustinian Friars in
+Broad Street Ward was occupied, soon after their
+suppression (12 Nov., 1538), by the mansion-house of
+that politic courtier the celebrated Marquis of Winchester,
+who managed to maintain himself in high
+station in spite of the changes which took place
+under the several reigns of Henry VIII, Edward VI,
+Mary, and Elizabeth, "by being a willow and not an
+oak." The building known at the present day as
+Winchester House, in Broad Street, stands near the
+site of the old mansion-house and garden of William
+Paulet, first Marquis of Winchester. The Friars'
+church he allowed to stand; and in June, 1550, the
+nave was granted, by virtue of a charter permitting
+alien non-conforming churches to exist in this country,
+to the Dutch and Walloon churches.<a id="noteref_1203" name="noteref_1203" href="#note_1203"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1203</span></span></a> The first marquis
+dying in 1571, he was succeeded by his son, who sold
+the monuments and lead from the roof of the remaining
+portion of the church and turned the place into
+a stable.<a id="noteref_1204" name="noteref_1204" href="#note_1204"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1204</span></span></a> The fourth marquis was reduced to parting
+with his house, built on the site of the old priory, in
+order to pay his debts, and appears to have found a
+purchaser in a wealthy London merchant and alderman
+of the city, John Swinnerton or Swynarton.<a id="noteref_1205" name="noteref_1205" href="#note_1205"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1205</span></span></a></p>
+
+<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page400">[pg 400]</span><a name="Pg400" id="Pg400" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The mayor's effort to save the destruction of the steeple of the Austin Friars Church.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The steeple of the church, which was of so great
+beauty that the citizens desired its preservation,<a id="noteref_1206" name="noteref_1206" href="#note_1206"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1206</span></span></a> was
+sold by the marquis to Henry Robinson, who forthwith
+set to work to pull it down on the ground that
+it was in such a state of decay as to be a danger to
+the passer-by. Swinnerton, who happened to be
+mayor at the time, ordered him to stay the work of
+demolition; he, however, not only hurried on the
+more, but obstructed the officers sent to put a stop to
+the work, for which he was committed to Newgate to
+stay there until he gave security for restoring what he had
+already pulled down. The thought suggests itself that
+the fact of Swinnerton having purchased adjacent property
+may have made him the more zealous in preventing
+the demolition of the steeple than perhaps he might
+otherwise have been. However that may be, he lost
+no time in informing the lords of the council of the
+state of affairs and asking their advice (16 Feb.,
+1612). The reply came three days later, and was to
+the effect that as the City had had the option of
+purchasing the steeple at even a less price than
+Robinson had paid for it, and might have come to
+some arrangement with the marquis to keep it in
+repair, it could not prevent Robinson, who purchased
+it as a speculation, making the best he could of his
+bargain; so that, unless the City consented to accept
+Robinson's offer to part with his property on payment
+of his purchase-money and disbursements within a
+fortnight, down the steeple must come.<a id="noteref_1207" name="noteref_1207" href="#note_1207"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1207</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The priory of St. Helen without Bishopsgate.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The priory of St. Helen without Bishopsgate
+was one of the last to be surrendered. In 1542 the<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page401">[pg 401]</span><a name="Pg401" id="Pg401" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc223" id="toc223"></a>
+nuns' chapel, which at one time was partitioned off
+from the rest of the church, was made over to Sir
+Richard Williams, a nephew of Thomas Cromwell,
+and ancestor of the Protector. The nuns' refectory or
+hall passed into the hands of the Leathersellers' Company
+and formed the company's hall until the close
+of the last century. The conduct of the inmates of
+the priory had not always been what it should be.<a id="noteref_1208" name="noteref_1208" href="#note_1208"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1208</span></span></a>
+The last prioress, in anticipation of the coming storm,
+leased a large portion of the conventual property to
+members of her own family, and at the time of the
+suppression was herself allowed a gratuity of £30
+and a pension.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Friendly relations between the Corporation and
+religious houses in the city.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The relations existing between the civic authorities
+and the religious houses in the city were often of
+a most friendly and cordial character. When, in 1520,
+the Friars of the Holy Cross wanted assistance for
+the maintenance and building of their church, they
+applied to the Corporation as being their "secund
+founders."<a id="noteref_1209" name="noteref_1209" href="#note_1209"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1209</span></span></a> For assistance thus given the friars
+bound themselves to pray for their benefactors.
+When, in 1512, the master of St. Bartholomew's
+hospital obtained a lease for ninety-nine years from
+the City of a parcel of land on which his gatehouse
+or porch stood, it was on condition of payment of a
+certain rent and of his keeping a yearly obit in his
+church for the souls of the mayor, aldermen and
+commons of the city; and when the master of the
+hospital, two years later, attempted to back out of<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page402">[pg 402]</span><a name="Pg402" id="Pg402" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+the terms of his lease and asked to be discharged
+from keeping the obit on the ground that he thought
+that the payment of the specified rent was sufficient
+for the premises, the Court of Aldermen unanimously
+decided that no part of the agreement should be
+minished or remitted.<a id="noteref_1210" name="noteref_1210" href="#note_1210"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1210</span></span></a> When the house of the
+Sisters Minoresses or Poor Clares, situate in Aldgate,
+suffered from fire, the Corporation rendered them
+pecuniary aid to the extent of 300 marks.<a id="noteref_1211" name="noteref_1211" href="#note_1211"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1211</span></span></a></p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">It was, however, to the Franciscans or Grey Friars
+that the citizens of London, individually as well as in
+their corporate capacity, were more especially attached.
+Soon after their arrival in England in 1223, they
+became indebted to the benevolence and generosity
+of citizens, their first benefactor having been John
+Ewen, citizen and mercer, who made them a gift of
+some land and houses in the parish of St. Nicholas
+by the Shambles. Upon this they erected their
+original building. Their first chapel, which became
+the chapel of their church, was built at the cost of
+William Joyner, who was mayor in 1239; the nave
+was added by Henry Waleys, who was frequently
+mayor during the reign of Edward I; the chapterhouse
+by Walter le Poter, elected sheriff in 1272; the
+dormitory by Gregory de Rokesley, who was mayor
+from 1274 to 1281, and again in 1284-5, and whose
+bones eventually found a resting place in their church;
+the refectory by another citizen, Bartholomew de
+Castro; and lastly—coming to later times—a library
+was added to their house by the bounty of Richard
+Whitington, as already narrated. It became the custom
+for the mayor and aldermen, as patron and<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page403">[pg 403]</span><a name="Pg403" id="Pg403" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc224" id="toc224"></a>
+founders, to pay a yearly visit to their house and
+church on St. Francis's day (4 Oct.). The custom
+dates from 1508. In 1522 the visit was for the first
+time followed by a dinner.<a id="noteref_1212" name="noteref_1212" href="#note_1212"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1212</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Royal injunction for keeping Parish Registers, 29 Sept., 1538.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">In one respect at least, if in no other, Cromwell's
+action in suppressing religious houses resulted in a
+benefit to the city of London as well as to the country
+at large, and this was in the institution of parish
+registers, not only for baptisms, but also for marriages.
+It had been his intention to establish them in 1536 to
+remedy the inconvenience to the public arising
+from the suppression of the smaller monasteries,
+and it is evident that some instructions were given at
+this time, inasmuch as the registers of two city parishes—viz.,
+St. James Garlickhithe and St. Mary Bothaw—commence
+in November of this year,<a id="noteref_1213" name="noteref_1213" href="#note_1213"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1213</span></span></a> although
+the royal injunction commanding that registers should
+systematically be kept up, under penalty of fines, was
+not published by Cromwell, as vicar-general, until the
+29th September, 1538. The delay is to be accounted
+for by the great discontent which the rumour of his
+project excited in the country. It was reported that
+some new tax on the services of the Church was contemplated,
+and the first in the list of popular grievances
+circulated by the rebels in the Pilgrimage of Grace
+was the payment of tribute to the king for the
+sacrament of baptism. In course of time, as matters
+became quieter and the government began to feel its
+own strength, Cromwell resumed a project never altogether
+abandoned, and caused the injunction to be<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page404">[pg 404]</span><a name="Pg404" id="Pg404" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+issued, an action for which posterity must ever be
+deeply grateful.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Great increase of London poor, consequent on the suppression of religious houses.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">On the other hand, the sudden closing of these
+institutions caused the streets to be thronged with the
+sick and poor, and the small parish churches to be so
+crowded with those who had been accustomed to frequent
+the larger and more commodious churches of
+the friars that there was scarce room left for the
+parishioners themselves. The city authorities saw at
+once that something would have to be done if they
+wished to keep their streets clear of beggars and of
+invalids, and not invite the spread of sickness by
+allowing infected persons to wander at large. As a
+means of affording temporary relief, collections for the
+poor were made every Sunday at Paul's Cross, after
+the sermon, and the proceeds were distributed weekly
+among the most necessitous,<a id="noteref_1214" name="noteref_1214" href="#note_1214"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1214</span></span></a> but more comprehensive
+steps were required to be taken.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Sir Richard Gresham's letter to the king for conveyance to the City of certain hospitals.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Sir Richard Gresham,<a id="noteref_1215" name="noteref_1215" href="#note_1215"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1215</span></span></a> who was mayor at the
+time (1537-8), took upon himself to address a letter<a id="noteref_1216" name="noteref_1216" href="#note_1216"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1216</span></span></a>
+to the king setting forth that there were three hospitals
+in the city, viz., St. Mary's Spital, St. Bartholomew's
+and St. Thomas's, besides the New Abbey on Tower
+Hill—institutions primarily founded "onely for the
+releffe, comforte and helpyng of pore and impotent<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page405">[pg 405]</span><a name="Pg405" id="Pg405" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc225" id="toc225"></a>
+people not beyng able to helpe theymselffes; and
+not to the mayntenannce of Chanons, Preests, and
+Monks to lyve in pleasure, nothyng regardyng the
+miserable people liyng in every strete, offendyng
+every clene person passyng by the way with theyre
+fylthy and nasty savours"—and asking that the
+mayor and aldermen of the city for the time being
+might have the order and disposition of the hospitals
+mentioned, and of all the lands, tenements and revenues
+appertaining to the same. If his grace would but
+grant this request the mayor promised that a great
+number of the indigent sick would be relieved, whilst
+"sturdy beggars" not willing to work would be
+punished.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Two petitions from the City, Mar., 1539.</span></div></div>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The City offers to purchase certain dissolved houses, 1 Aug., 1540.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">In March, 1539, the City presented two petitions
+to the king, one desiring that the late dissolved houses
+might be made over to them, together with their rents
+and revenues, in order that relief might be provided for
+the sick and needy, and the other asking that Henry
+would be pleased to convey to them the churches of the
+late four orders of friars, together with their lands and
+tenements, so that the mayor and citizens might take
+order for the due performance of divine service therein
+to the glory of God and the honour of the king.<a id="noteref_1217" name="noteref_1217" href="#note_1217"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1217</span></span></a>
+These petitions having been either refused or ignored,
+the Court of Common Council, on the 1st August,
+1540, authorised the mayor and aldermen to make
+diligent suit to the king for the purchase of the houses,
+churches, and cloisters of the dissolved friars, and to
+make an offer of 1,000 marks for them "yf thei can
+be gotten no better chepe."<a id="noteref_1218" name="noteref_1218" href="#note_1218"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1218</span></span></a> Henry upbraided the<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page406">[pg 406]</span><a name="Pg406" id="Pg406" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+City for being "pynche pence" or stingy in their
+offer,<a id="noteref_1219" name="noteref_1219" href="#note_1219"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1219</span></span></a> but as no better offer was made the matter was
+allowed to stand over, and nothing was done for four
+years.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The City in difficulties with king and parliament, 1541-1542.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Henry meanwhile took the opportunity afforded
+him by a full treasury, which rendered him independent
+of the favour of the citizens, of robbing them of
+their right of measuring linen-cloth and other commodities,
+and conferring the same by letters patent
+on John Godsalve, one of the clerks of the signet.
+The City's right was incontestable, and had been
+admitted by the king's chancellor, as well as by the
+Chancellor of the Court of Fruits and Tenths (a court
+recently established), and the mayor and aldermen
+represented the facts of the case to the king himself
+by letter, dated the 21st July, 1541.<a id="noteref_1220" name="noteref_1220" href="#note_1220"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1220</span></span></a> Another
+"variance" occurred about this time between the City
+and the Crown touching the office and duties of the
+City's waterbailiff.<a id="noteref_1221" name="noteref_1221" href="#note_1221"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1221</span></span></a></p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Again, in the spring of 1542, an incident occurred
+which caused the relations between parliament and
+the City to be somewhat strained. The sheriffs of
+that year—Rowland Hill,<a id="noteref_1222" name="noteref_1222" href="#note_1222"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1222</span></span></a> an ancestor of the founder
+of the Penny Post, and Henry Suckley—had thought
+fit to obstruct the sergeant-at-mace in the execution
+of his duty, whilst attempting to remove a
+prisoner, who was a member of parliament, from<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page407">[pg 407]</span><a name="Pg407" id="Pg407" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc226" id="toc226"></a>
+one of the compters. The arrest of a member
+of parliament has always been a hazardous operation,
+and the sheriffs after a time thought better of it and
+gave up their prisoner. The Speaker, nevertheless,
+summoned them to appear at the Bar of the House
+and finally committed them to the Tower. They
+were released after two or three days, however, at
+the humble suit of the mayor.<a id="noteref_1223" name="noteref_1223" href="#note_1223"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1223</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Precautions against the spread of pestilence, 1543.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">In the following year (1543) the plague returned,
+and extra-precautions had to be taken against the
+spread of the disease, now that the houses of the
+friars were no longer open to receive patients and to
+alleviate distress. Besides the usual order that infected
+houses should be marked with a cross, the mayor
+caused proclamation to be made that persons of independent
+means should undergo quarantine for one
+month after recovery from sickness, whilst others
+whom necessity compelled to walk abroad for their
+livelihood were to carry in their hands white rods,
+two feet in length, for the space of forty days after
+convalescence. Straw and rushes in an infected house
+were to be removed to the fields before they were
+burnt, and infected clothing was to be carried away
+to be aired and not to be hung out of window. The
+hard-heartedness engendered by these visitations is
+evidenced by the necessity of the mayor having to
+enjoin that thenceforth no householder within the
+city or liberties should put any person stricken with
+the plague out of his house into the street, without
+making provision for his being kept in some other<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page408">[pg 408]</span><a name="Pg408" id="Pg408" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+house. All dogs other than hounds, spaniels or mastiffs
+kept for the purpose of guarding the house were forthwith
+to be removed out of the city or killed,
+whilst watch-dogs were to be confined to the house.<a id="noteref_1224" name="noteref_1224" href="#note_1224"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1224</span></span></a>
+In October the mayor was ordered to resume the
+weekly bills of mortality, which of late had been
+neglected, in order that the king might be kept informed
+as to the increase or decrease of the sickness.<a id="noteref_1225" name="noteref_1225" href="#note_1225"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1225</span></span></a>
+The Michaelmas Law Sittings had to be postponed
+until the 15th November, and were removed to St.
+Albans.<a id="noteref_1226" name="noteref_1226" href="#note_1226"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1226</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Preparation for renewal of war with France, 1544.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Whilst the city was being wasted by disease the
+king was preparing for war with France.<a id="noteref_1227" name="noteref_1227" href="#note_1227"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1227</span></span></a> A joint
+expedition by Henry and Charles was to be undertaken
+in the following year (1544). A commission
+was issued early in the year for raising money in the
+city, and the lord chancellor himself, accompanied by
+officers of State, came into the city to read it. Finding
+that the lord mayor's name appeared third on the
+commission instead of being placed at its head, the
+chancellor ordered the mistake to be at once rectified
+by the town clerk and a new commission to be drawn
+up, whilst the rest of the lords agreed that at their
+several sessions on the business of this subsidy the
+lord mayor should occupy the seat of honour.<a id="noteref_1228" name="noteref_1228" href="#note_1228"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1228</span></span></a> By
+the end of April the chancellor (Audley) had died.
+His successor, Lord Wriothesley, had not long been
+appointed before the Court of Aldermen sent a deputation
+to desire his lordship's favour and friendship<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page409">[pg 409]</span><a name="Pg409" id="Pg409" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc227" id="toc227"></a>
+in the city's affairs, and agreed to make him a present
+of a couple of silver-gilt pots to the value of £20
+or thereabouts.<a id="noteref_1229" name="noteref_1229" href="#note_1229"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1229</span></span></a> On the 24th May the Common
+Council agreed to provide a contingent of 500 or 600
+men at the discretion of the mayor and aldermen,
+the men being raised from the livery companies.<a id="noteref_1230" name="noteref_1230" href="#note_1230"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1230</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The re-establishment of St. Bartholomew's hospital, 23 June, 1544.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Just as the king was about to set sail for the
+continent, he issued letters patent (23 June, 1544)
+re-establishing the hospital of St. Bartholomew on a
+new foundation, with the avowed object of providing
+"comfort to prisoners, shelter to the poor, visitation
+to the sick, food to the hungry, drink to the thirsty,
+clothes to the naked, and sepulture to the dead."<a id="noteref_1231" name="noteref_1231" href="#note_1231"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1231</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The campaign in France of 1544.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Henry crossed over to France, leaving the new
+queen, Catherine Parr, widow of Lord Latimer, whom
+he had recently married, regent of the realm. After
+a long siege, lasting from July until September, he
+succeeded in taking Boulogne. On Thursday, the 25th
+September, an order was received by the Court of
+Aldermen from the lord chancellor, on behalf of the
+queen regent, to get in readiness another contingent of
+500 men well harnessed and weaponed, 100 of whom
+were to be archers and the rest billmen. The last
+mentioned were to be provided with "blak bylles or
+morys pykes." The whole force was to be ready for
+shipment to Boulogne by the following Saturday. No
+time was to be lost. The wardens of the city
+companies were immediately summoned, and each
+company was ordered to provide the same number<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page410">[pg 410]</span><a name="Pg410" id="Pg410" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+of men as on the last occasion. Each soldier was to
+be provided with a coat of grey frieze, with half
+sleeves, and a pair of new boots or else "sterte upps."
+The Corporation for its part appointed five captains,
+to each of whom was given the sum of £10 towards
+his apparel and charges, whilst £5 was allowed to
+each petty captain. These sums were paid out of the
+"goods" of the mayor and commonalty.<a id="noteref_1232" name="noteref_1232" href="#note_1232"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1232</span></span></a></p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Scarcely had the city recovered from this drain
+upon its population before it was again called upon to
+fill up the ranks of the army in France. On Saturday,
+the 25th October, the Court of Aldermen was ordered
+to raise another force of 500 men by the following
+Monday. It was no easy matter to comply with so
+sudden a demand. The city companies were called
+upon to contribute as before, any deficiency in the
+number of men raised by them being made up by
+men raised by the mayor and aldermen themselves
+in a somewhat novel fashion. The Court of Aldermen
+had agreed that each of their number should on
+the Saturday night make the round of his ward and
+select "fifty, forty, twenty, or ten" tall and comely men,
+who should be warned in the king's name to appear
+the next morning before seven o'clock at the Guildhall.
+On Sunday morning the mayor and aldermen
+came to the Guildhall, and took the names of those
+whom they had selected over night. Two hundred
+men were eventually set apart to make up the
+deficiency of those to be provided by the companies.
+By six o'clock in the evening the whole contingent of
+500 men was thus raised, and at nine o'clock on
+Monday morning they mustered at Leadenhall,<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page411">[pg 411]</span><a name="Pg411" id="Pg411" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc228" id="toc228"></a>
+whence they were conducted by the sheriffs and city
+chamberlain to the Tower Hill and handed over to
+Sir Thomas Arundel, who complimented the civic
+authorities on the appearance of the men, and promised
+to commend their diligence to the king.<a id="noteref_1233" name="noteref_1233" href="#note_1233"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1233</span></span></a> This same
+Monday morning (27 Oct.) the mayor received instructions
+to see that such carpenters and other
+artificers as had been "prested" for the king's
+service at Boulogne by the king's master-carpenter
+kept their day and presented themselves at the time
+and place appointed on pain of death.<a id="noteref_1234" name="noteref_1234" href="#note_1234"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1234</span></span></a> Search was
+ordered to be made in the following month for
+mariners lurking in the city, and if any were discovered
+they were to be forthwith despatched to
+the ships awaiting them.<a id="noteref_1235" name="noteref_1235" href="#note_1235"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1235</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">City gift to the king on his return from France.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">By this time the king had ceased to take a
+personal part in the campaign and had returned home,
+the mayor and aldermen giving him a hearty welcome,
+and making him a suitable present in token of
+their joy for his return and his success in effecting the
+surrender of Boulogne.<a id="noteref_1236" name="noteref_1236" href="#note_1236"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1236</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Opposition to a benevolence in the city, 1545.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">At the opening of the next year (1545) Henry
+demanded another benevolence after the rate of two
+shillings in the pound. The lord chancellor and others
+of the king's council sat at Baynard's Castle to collect
+the benevolence of the city, "callinge all the citizens
+of the same before them, begininge first with the
+mayor and aldermen."<a id="noteref_1237" name="noteref_1237" href="#note_1237"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1237</span></span></a> Richard Rede, alderman of
+the ward of Farringdon Without, resisted this demand<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page412">[pg 412]</span><a name="Pg412" id="Pg412" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+as unconstitutional, and was promptly despatched to
+the king in Scotland, where he was shortly afterwards
+made a prisoner of war. Another alderman, Sir
+William Roche, of Bassishaw ward, was unfortunate
+enough to offend the council and was committed to
+the Fleet.<a id="noteref_1238" name="noteref_1238" href="#note_1238"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1238</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">William Laxton, mayor, knighted, 8 Feb., 1545.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">On the 8th February William Laxton, the mayor,
+was presented to the king at Westminster, when
+Henry took occasion to thank him and his brother
+aldermen for the benevolence they had given him.
+He informed them of the success that had recently
+attended the English forces under the Earl of
+Hertford and the lord admiral, Sir John Dudley,
+whom he had left as deputy of Boulogne, and dismissed
+them to their homes after conferring upon the
+mayor the honour of knighthood.<a id="noteref_1239" name="noteref_1239" href="#note_1239"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1239</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">A call for volunteers for the French war. April, 1545.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">In the following April volunteers were called for,
+and those in the city willing to follow the fortunes of
+war as "adventurers" were asked to repair to the
+sign of the "Gunne," at Billingsgate, where they would
+receive directions from John of Caleys, captain of all
+such adventurers, for their passage to France.<a id="noteref_1240" name="noteref_1240" href="#note_1240"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1240</span></span></a> The
+sessions of the law courts were adjourned in order
+to give lawyers and suitors an opportunity of showing
+their patriotism by taking up arms.<a id="noteref_1241" name="noteref_1241" href="#note_1241"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1241</span></span></a> The city companies
+furnished 100 men appareled "with whyte
+cotes of penystone whytes<a id="noteref_1242" name="noteref_1242" href="#note_1242"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1242</span></span></a> or karsies," with a<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page413">[pg 413]</span><a name="Pg413" id="Pg413" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc229" id="toc229"></a>
+red cross of St. George before and behind, each being
+provided with a white cap to wear under his "sallett
+or scull."<a id="noteref_1243" name="noteref_1243" href="#note_1243"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1243</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The last subsidy to be forthwith paid up.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">There yet remained a portion of the last subsidy to
+be collected, for which purpose the lord chancellor
+once more paid a visit to the city (12 June) and sat
+in the Guildhall. Every alderman was straitly
+charged to call before him every person in his ward
+who was worth £40 and upwards. The king's affairs
+were pressing, and this last payment must be immediately
+forthcoming.<a id="noteref_1244" name="noteref_1244" href="#note_1244"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1244</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">A force of 2,000 soldiers demanded of the City, June, 1545.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">A week later (19 June) letters from the king
+were read to the Court of Aldermen touching the
+levying of more forces and firing of beacons—a French
+squadron had appeared off the south coast. It
+was resolved to adjourn consideration of the message
+until the following Monday, when the lord chancellor
+and other lords of the council would again be coming
+into the city for the subsidy, and their advice could
+be asked. The outcome of these letters was that the
+City had to raise a force of 2,000 able men. To do this
+an assessment of a fifteenth was ordered to be levied
+on the wards, but in the meantime the money so to
+be raised was to be advanced by the aldermen.<a id="noteref_1245" name="noteref_1245" href="#note_1245"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1245</span></span></a> Not
+only were the aldermen on this, as on other occasions,
+mulcted in their pocket, but they were also called upon
+to personally share with the lord mayor himself and the
+sheriffs in the extra watch which in the "besye tyme
+of the warres" was ordered to be kept in the city.<a id="noteref_1246" name="noteref_1246" href="#note_1246"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1246</span></span></a><span class="tei tei-pb" id="page414">[pg 414]</span><a name="Pg414" id="Pg414" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+In the meantime a man was despatched by the Court
+of Aldermen to St. James' Fair to buy five wey of
+cheese for the city's soldiers who were already at
+Guildford. The cheese was to be sent by water as
+far as Kingston, whence it would be conveyed by
+"the good industrye and help of Master Judde, alderman,"
+to its destination. The bakers of Stratford
+contracted to send two cart-loads of bread. It was
+further agreed on the same day that Christopher
+Fowlke should forthwith go to Guildford, and further
+if need be, "to guyde the seyd vytayle and to utter
+the same to the souldyers by thassistence of the
+sworde berer and the under chamberleyn. And to
+recyve money for the same."<a id="noteref_1247" name="noteref_1247" href="#note_1247"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1247</span></span></a> A flag and a drum
+were likewise to be despatched forthwith. The
+citizen soldiers were required to assist in driving out
+the French, who had effected a landing in the Isle of
+Wight; but before they arrived the enemy had disappeared.<a id="noteref_1248" name="noteref_1248" href="#note_1248"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1248</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Boulogne threatened.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The French king now prepared to lay siege to
+Boulogne, and the citizens were again called upon to
+furnish soldiers. One thousand men were required,
+and this number was only raised by enlisting men who
+had failed to pass previous musters. However, there
+was no time to pick and choose.<a id="noteref_1249" name="noteref_1249" href="#note_1249"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1249</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Act for confiscating chantries, &amp;c., 1545.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">By this time Henry's resources were fast giving
+out. A parliament was summoned to meet in November,
+and again resort was had to confiscation for the
+purpose of supplying the king with money. An Act
+was passed which placed 2,000 chantries and chapels
+and over 100 hospitals at Henry's disposal.<a id="noteref_1250" name="noteref_1250" href="#note_1250"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1250</span></span></a></p>
+
+<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page415">[pg 415]</span><a name="Pg415" id="Pg415" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc230" id="toc230"></a>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Peace with France proclaimed, 13 June, 1546.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">All parties were, however, tired of the war, and
+in the following June (1546) a peace was concluded.
+Henry was allowed to retain Boulogne as security for
+a debt, and the French admiral soon afterwards paid
+a visit to the city, where he was heartily welcomed
+and hospitably entertained.<a id="noteref_1251" name="noteref_1251" href="#note_1251"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1251</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Uniformity of religion enforced, 1546.</span></div></div>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Recantation of the rector of St. Mary Aldermary.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Freed from the embarrassment of foreign wars,
+Henry now had leisure to turn his attention to home
+affairs, and more particularly to the establishment of
+that uniformity which he so much desired, and
+which he endeavoured to bring about by getting rid
+of all those who differed in opinion from himself.
+Those who openly declared their disbelief in any one
+of the "Six Articles," and more particularly in the
+first article, which established the doctrine of the real
+presence, ran the risk of death by the gallows, the
+block or the stake. A city rector, Dr. Crome, of the
+church of St. Mary Aldermary, got into disgrace for
+speaking lightly of the benefits to be derived from
+private masses, and, although his argument tended to
+minimise the effect of the recent confiscation of so
+many chantries, he was called upon to make a public
+recantation at Paul's Cross.<a id="noteref_1252" name="noteref_1252" href="#note_1252"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1252</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Trial and execution of Anne Ascue.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Others were not so compliant. Among these was
+Anne Ascue or Ascough, a daughter of Sir William
+Ascough, of Kelsey, in Lincolnshire, and sometimes
+known as Anne Kyme, from the name of her husband,
+with whom she had ceased to live. In June, 1545,
+she and some others, among whom was another
+woman, Joan, wife of John Sauterie, of London, had<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page416">[pg 416]</span><a name="Pg416" id="Pg416" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+been arraigned at the Guildhall "for speaking against
+the sacrament of the altar"; but, no evidence being
+adduced against her, she was on that occasion acquitted
+and discharged.<a id="noteref_1253" name="noteref_1253" href="#note_1253"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1253</span></span></a> Scarcely a year elapsed before she
+was again in custody. On the 18th June, 1546, she
+was tried at the Guildhall and condemned to be
+burned alive as a heretic at Smithfield, where the city
+chamberlain had orders to erect a "substantial stage,"
+whence the king's council and the civic authorities
+might witness the scene.<a id="noteref_1254" name="noteref_1254" href="#note_1254"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1254</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Improved water supply of the city, 1545-1546.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The insanitary condition of the city, occasioned
+for the most part by an insufficient supply of water,
+was not improved by the influx of disbanded and
+invalided soldiers, followed by a swarm of vagabonds
+and idlers, which took place at the conclusion of
+peace with France. To the soldiers licences were
+granted to solicit alms for longer or shorter periods,
+whilst the vagabonds were ordered to quit the city.<a id="noteref_1255" name="noteref_1255" href="#note_1255"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1255</span></span></a>
+The water question had been taken in hand by the
+Common Council towards the close of the preceding
+year (1545), when Sir Martin Bowes entered upon
+his mayoralty, and a tax of two fifteenths was
+imposed upon the inhabitants of the city for the
+purpose of conveying fresh water from certain
+"lively sprynges" recently discovered at Hackney.<a id="noteref_1256" name="noteref_1256" href="#note_1256"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1256</span></span></a>
+Bowes himself was very energetic in the matter,
+and before he went out of office he had the satisfaction
+of seeing a plentiful supply of water brought
+into the heart of the city from the suburban manor
+of Finsbury.<a id="noteref_1257" name="noteref_1257" href="#note_1257"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1257</span></span></a></p>
+
+<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page417">[pg 417]</span><a name="Pg417" id="Pg417" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc231" id="toc231"></a>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">St. Bartholomew's Hospital, &amp;c., vested in the City, 13 Jan., 1547.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Henry's reign was now fast drawing to a close.
+In April, 1546, he had bestowed an endowment of 500
+marks a year on the city poor-houses on condition the
+citizens themselves found a similar sum.<a id="noteref_1258" name="noteref_1258" href="#note_1258"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1258</span></span></a> In January,
+1547—a few days only before he died—he showed
+still further care for the city poor by vesting in the
+Corporation, not only St. Bartholomew's Hospital,
+thenceforth to be known as the House of the Poor in
+West Smithfield, but also the house and church of the
+dissolved monastery of the Grey Friars and the house
+and hospital of Bethlehem.<a id="noteref_1259" name="noteref_1259" href="#note_1259"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1259</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">A committee appointed to investigate the recently acquired property, 6 May, 1547.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The Corporation lost no time in getting their
+newly acquired property into working order. On the
+6th May the late king's conveyance was read before
+the Court of Aldermen, and thereupon a committee,
+of which Sir Martin Bowes was a prominent member,
+was deputed to make an abstract of the yearly
+revenues and charges of the house of the Grey Friars
+and hospital of little Saint Bartholomew, and to
+report thereon to the court with as much speed as
+possible.<a id="noteref_1260" name="noteref_1260" href="#note_1260"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1260</span></span></a> From a purely monetary point of view the
+City had made a bad bargain, and had saddled itself
+with an annual expenditure out of the Corporation
+revenues to an extent little thought of at the time.<a id="noteref_1261" name="noteref_1261" href="#note_1261"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1261</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The king's death, 28 Jan., 1547.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">On the 28th January, 1547, Henry died "at hys
+most pryncely howse at Westminster, comenly<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page418">[pg 418]</span><a name="Pg418" id="Pg418" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+called Yorkeplace or Whytehall"—the palace which
+Cardinal Wolsey built for himself, and which Henry
+appropriated, extending its grounds and preserves in
+cynical contempt of public convenience and utter
+disregard of the chartered rights of the citizens of
+London.<a id="noteref_1262" name="noteref_1262" href="#note_1262"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1262</span></span></a> There his corpse remained until the 14th
+February, when it was removed at 8 o'clock in the
+morning to Sion House, near Richmond, and thence
+conveyed to Windsor on the following day.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Edward VI proclaimed king in the city, 31 Jan., 1547.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">In the meantime the mayor, Henry Huberthorne,
+or Hoberthorne,<a id="noteref_1263" name="noteref_1263" href="#note_1263"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1263</span></span></a> had been sent for (31 Jan.) to attend
+the king's council at Westminster, where he received
+orders to return to the city and cause himself and his
+brother aldermen to be arrayed in their scarlet robes,
+in order to accompany the heralds whilst they proclaimed
+the new king in various parts of the city.
+This being done, the mayor took steps for securing the
+peace of the city, and the citizens voted Edward a
+benevolence of a fifteenth and a half.<a id="noteref_1264" name="noteref_1264" href="#note_1264"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1264</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Distribution of gowns of black livery.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Edward on his part presented the mayor and
+aldermen with 104 gowns of black livery, according to
+the precedent followed at the decease of Henry VII.<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page419">[pg 419]</span><a name="Pg419" id="Pg419" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc232" id="toc232"></a>
+These gowns were distributed among the mayor
+and aldermen, the high officers and certain clerks
+in the service of the Corporation. Ten aldermen
+accompanied the remains of the late king on their
+way to Windsor, riding forth in black coats with the
+rest of the mourners, the harness and bridles of their
+horses being covered with black cloth. Two of the
+aldermen, Sir William Laxton and Sir Martin Bowes,
+had each four servants in their suite, whilst the rest
+of the aldermen had three, all in black coats.<a id="noteref_1265" name="noteref_1265" href="#note_1265"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1265</span></span></a></p>
+</div>
+</div>
+
+<hr class="doublepage" /><div class="tei tei-div" style="margin-bottom: 5.00em; margin-top: 5.00em">
+<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page420">[pg 420]</span><a name="Pg420" id="Pg420" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+<a name="toc233" id="toc233"></a>
+<a name="pdf234" id="pdf234"></a>
+<h1 class="tei tei-head" style="text-align: left; margin-bottom: 3.46em; margin-top: 3.46em"><span style="font-size: 173%">CHAPTER XV.</span></h1>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-div" style="margin-bottom: 4.00em; margin-top: 4.00em">
+<h2 class="tei tei-head" style="text-align: left; margin-bottom: 2.88em; margin-top: 2.88em"></h2>
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Accession and coronation of Edward VI, 1547.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Provision had been made for the succession to
+the crown on Henry's death by an Act of Parliament
+passed in 1544, and the princesses Mary and Elizabeth
+were thereby re-instated in their rights of
+inheritance as if no question of their legitimacy had
+ever been raised. As Edward, who was next in
+succession to the crown, was but a boy, Henry had
+taken pains to select a council of regency in which
+no one party should predominate. This council was
+soon set aside, and Hertford, the king's uncle, got
+himself appointed Protector of the realm and took
+the title of Duke of Somerset. At the time of his
+father's death Edward was residing at Hertford Castle.
+He was soon afterwards carried thence by his uncle
+to London and lodged in the Tower, where the mayor,
+Henry Hoberthorne, went to pay his respects and
+received the honour of knighthood.<a id="noteref_1266" name="noteref_1266" href="#note_1266"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1266</span></span></a></p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">On the 19th the young king passed through the
+city to Westminster, the mayor riding before him
+bareheaded with the mace of crystal<a id="noteref_1267" name="noteref_1267" href="#note_1267"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1267</span></span></a> in his hand.<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page421">[pg 421]</span><a name="Pg421" id="Pg421" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc235" id="toc235"></a>
+The streets were lined with members of the livery
+companies. The conduits, the standard and cross in
+Chepe, the Ludgate and the Temple Bar had been
+freshly painted and trimmed with goodly hangings of
+Arras and cloth of gold for the occasion. At three of
+the conduits, namely, the conduit in Cornhill, the
+great conduit in Chepe, and the conduit in Fleet
+Street, wine was made by artificial means to flow as
+if from the "festrons" of the conduits themselves.
+At the little conduit in Chepe were stationed the
+aldermen of the city, in their scarlet gowns, and the
+Recorder, who, in the name of the whole city, presented
+his majesty with 1,000 marks in "hole new
+sufferaynes" of gold in a purse of purple cloth of gold,
+which his majesty deigned to accept with his own
+hand. The next day Edward was crowned. The lord
+mayor, according to custom, attended with his crystal
+mace as the king passed from his palace to church, and
+thence, after mass, to Westminster Hall, and received
+for his services the customary gold cup, which on this
+occasion weighed twenty ounces, with its cover and a
+"leyer" (or laver) silver-gilt weighing six ounces.<a id="noteref_1268" name="noteref_1268" href="#note_1268"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1268</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Opposition in the city to the sacrament of the mass, 1547-1548.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The work of reformation was now about to be
+taken seriously in hand. Something, it is true, had
+been done in this direction under Henry, but in
+<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">dilettante</span></span> fashion. The ceremony connected with
+the boy-bishop, which even Colet had thought
+worthy to be perpetuated in his school,<a id="noteref_1269" name="noteref_1269" href="#note_1269"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1269</span></span></a> had been<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page422">[pg 422]</span><a name="Pg422" id="Pg422" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+abolished by order of the mayor in 1538.<a id="noteref_1270" name="noteref_1270" href="#note_1270"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1270</span></span></a> The ruthless
+destruction of the shrine of St. Thomas at
+Canterbury, and the erasure of his name from service-books,
+had been followed in the city by an order
+(1539) for a new common seal on which the arms of
+the city were substituted for the original effigy of
+the saint.<a id="noteref_1271" name="noteref_1271" href="#note_1271"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1271</span></span></a> Henry himself only coquetted with
+Protestantism; his chief object, if not the only one,
+was to get rid of the papal supremacy; but among
+the bourgeois class of the city there was an earnest
+desire to see an improvement made in the doctrine
+and discipline of the Church.<a id="noteref_1272" name="noteref_1272" href="#note_1272"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1272</span></span></a></p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Whilst the statute of the Six Articles was still
+unrepealed, the sacrament of the mass frequently
+provoked open hostility in the city. Thus, in August,
+1538, Robert Reynold, a stationer, was declared upon
+the oath of five independent witnesses to have been
+heard to say "that the masse was nawght, and the
+memento was Bawdrye, and after the consecracioun
+of the masse yt was idolatrye." He was further
+charged with having said that it were better for him
+to confess and be houseled by a temporal rather than
+a spiritual man.<a id="noteref_1273" name="noteref_1273" href="#note_1273"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1273</span></span></a> Again, in February, 1543, Hugh
+Eton, a hosier of London, was convicted of disguising
+himself "in fonde fassyon," and of irreverently walking
+up and down in St. Bride's Church before the sacrament,
+disturbing the priests at mass and creating a
+tumult. By way of punishment for his offence he was
+set in the cage in Fleet Street, "disguised" as he was,<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page423">[pg 423]</span><a name="Pg423" id="Pg423" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc236" id="toc236"></a>
+with a paper on his head setting forth his offence.
+He there remained until four o'clock in the afternoon,
+when he was removed to the compter and condemned
+to stay there a prisoner until he found sureties for
+good behaviour.<a id="noteref_1274" name="noteref_1274" href="#note_1274"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1274</span></span></a></p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">After the repeal of the statute by Edward's first
+parliament, the opposition to the "sacrament of the
+altar," as the mass was called, became greater than
+ever.<a id="noteref_1275" name="noteref_1275" href="#note_1275"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1275</span></span></a> A boy was ordered to be whipt naked in the
+church of St. Mary Woolnoth for throwing his cap at
+the host at the time of elevation.<a id="noteref_1276" name="noteref_1276" href="#note_1276"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1276</span></span></a> In February,
+1548, information was given to the Court of Aldermen
+of preachers having used "certain words" touching the
+mass in the churches of St. Dunstan in the east and
+St. Martin Orgar.<a id="noteref_1277" name="noteref_1277" href="#note_1277"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1277</span></span></a> On the 5th May, 1548, the mayor
+and aldermen resolved to appear the next day before
+the Lord Protector Somerset and the council, and
+explain the nature of the misdemeanours of certain
+preachers, concerning which the mayor had already
+had some communication with the Archbishop of
+Canterbury.<a id="noteref_1278" name="noteref_1278" href="#note_1278"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1278</span></span></a></p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">In the following month (5 June) the Court of
+Aldermen investigated a charge made against a city<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page424">[pg 424]</span><a name="Pg424" id="Pg424" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+curate that, about a month before, after reciting the
+common prayers at the choir door at high mass, he
+had prayed among other things that Almighty God
+might send the king's council grace and bring them
+out of the erroneous opinions that they were then in.
+The informer went on to say that Sir Clement Smith
+and the Recorder, who were present, laughed at the
+prayer. But inasmuch as the informer had not been
+present himself, and that what he had laid before the
+court was mere hearsay evidence, little attention was
+paid to it.<a id="noteref_1279" name="noteref_1279" href="#note_1279"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1279</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Act for abolition of chantries, 1547.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The abolition of chantries initiated by Henry
+VIII was carried out to a fuller extent by his successor.
+The statute (1 Edward VI, cap 14) by which
+this was effected not only deprived a large number of
+priests of a means of livelihood, but laid them open to
+insult from those they met in the street. They complained
+that they could not walk abroad nor attend
+the court at Westminster without being reviled and
+having their tippets and caps violently pulled.<a id="noteref_1280" name="noteref_1280" href="#note_1280"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1280</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Redemption of charges for superstitious uses by the city and companies, 1550.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The same statute—by declaring all chantries,
+obits, lights and lamps to be objects of superstitious
+use, and all goods, chattels, jewels, plate, ornaments
+and other moveables hitherto devoted to their maintenance
+to be thenceforth escheated to the Crown—dealt
+a heavy blow to the Corporation of the City of
+London, as well as to the civic companies and other
+bodies who owned property subject to certain payments
+under one or other of these heads. Three years after<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page425">[pg 425]</span><a name="Pg425" id="Pg425" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc237" id="toc237"></a>
+the passing of the Act the Corporation and the companies
+redeemed certain charges of this character on
+their respective properties to the amount of £939 2<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">s.</span></span>
+5-1/2<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">d.</span></span> by payment to the Crown of no less a sum than
+£18,744 11<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">s.</span></span> 2<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">d.</span></span><a id="noteref_1281" name="noteref_1281" href="#note_1281"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1281</span></span></a></p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The redemption of these and other charges of a
+similar character, whilst very convenient to the Crown,
+saving the trouble and expense of collecting small
+sums of money, worked a hardship upon the Corporation
+and the companies. In order to raise funds
+for redeeming the charges they were obliged to
+sell property. This property was often held under
+conditions of reverter and remainders over, unless
+what was now declared to be illegal was religiously
+carried out. It was manifestly unfair that they should
+be made to forfeit property because the conditions
+under which it was held could no longer be legally
+complied with. A petition therefore was presented
+to the king in order to obviate this difficulty, and to
+enable them to part with the necessary property and
+at the same time to give a clear title.<a id="noteref_1282" name="noteref_1282" href="#note_1282"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1282</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Order for demolition of images, pictures, &amp;c., Aug., 1547.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">In the meantime (Aug., 1547) an order had gone
+forth for the demolition of all images and removal of
+pictures and stained glass from churches. The instructions
+sent to the lord mayor were very precise.
+"Stories made in glasse wyndows" relative to Thomas
+Becket were to be altered at as little expense as possible.
+Images and pictures to which no offerings and no
+prayers were made might remain for "garnisshement"<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page426">[pg 426]</span><a name="Pg426" id="Pg426" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+of the churches; and if any such had been taken down
+the mayor was at liberty to set them up again, unless
+they had been taken down by order of the king's
+commissioners or the parson of the church. If there
+existed in any church a "storye in glasse" of the
+Bishop of Rome, otherwise the Pope, the mayor
+might paint out the papal tiara and alter the "storye."<a id="noteref_1283" name="noteref_1283" href="#note_1283"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1283</span></span></a>
+These instructions, contained in a letter from the
+king's council, were duly considered at a Court of
+Aldermen held on the 22nd September, with the
+result that every alderman was ordered, in the most
+secret, discreet and quiet manner he could devise, to
+visit each parish church in his ward, and to take with
+him the parson or curate and two or three honest
+parishioners, churchwardens or others who had had
+anything to do with the removal of the images that
+had already been taken down, and, having shut
+the church door for the sake of privacy, to take a
+note in writing of what images had formerly been
+in the several churches, what images had offerings
+and were prayed to, and what not; who had removed
+those taken down, and what had been done
+with them. A report was to be made on these points
+by every alderman at the next court, so that the
+lords of the council might be informed thereon and
+their will ascertained before any further steps were
+taken.<a id="noteref_1284" name="noteref_1284" href="#note_1284"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1284</span></span></a></p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The havoc worked by the king's commissioners
+in the city and throughout the country by the reckless
+destruction of works of art was terrible. The
+churches were stripped of every ornament, their walls<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page427">[pg 427]</span><a name="Pg427" id="Pg427" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc238" id="toc238"></a>
+whitewashed, and only relieved by the tables of
+the commandments. Early in September the commissioners
+visited St. Paul's and pulled down all the
+images. In November the rood was taken down
+with its images of the Virgin and St. John. The great
+cross of the rood fell down accidentally and killed
+one of the workmen, a circumstance which many
+ascribed to the special intervention of the Almighty.
+From St. Paul's the commissioners proceeded to the
+church of St. Bride, and so from parish church to
+parish church.<a id="noteref_1285" name="noteref_1285" href="#note_1285"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1285</span></span></a></p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">In the following year (1548) the chapel of St.
+Paul's charnel house was pulled down and the
+bones removed into the country and reburied. From
+a sanitary point of view their removal is to be commended.
+There is no such excuse, however, for the
+destruction of the cloister in Pardon churchyard
+(April, 1549), with its famous picture of the Dance
+of Death, painted at the expense of John Carpenter, the
+town clerk of the city, of whom mention has already
+been made. The fact was that the Protector Somerset
+required material for building his new palace in
+the Strand,<a id="noteref_1286" name="noteref_1286" href="#note_1286"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1286</span></span></a> to enlarge which he had already pulled
+down Strand Church, dedicated to Saint Mary and
+the Holy Innocents.<a id="noteref_1287" name="noteref_1287" href="#note_1287"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1287</span></span></a> The destruction of the cloister
+necessitated a new order of procession on the next
+Lord Mayor's Day (24 Oct.), when Sir Rowland Hill
+paid the customary visit to St. Paul's, made a circuit<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page428">[pg 428]</span><a name="Pg428" id="Pg428" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+of the interior of the cathedral, and said a <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">De profundis</span></span>
+at the bishop's tomb.<a id="noteref_1288" name="noteref_1288" href="#note_1288"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1288</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The citizens and the Grey Friars Church, 1547.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Nor can the civic authorities themselves be altogether
+acquitted of vandalism. They destroyed the
+churches of St. Nicholas Shambles and St. Ewin, and
+sold the plate and windows, but the proceeds were
+distributed among the poor.<a id="noteref_1289" name="noteref_1289" href="#note_1289"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1289</span></span></a> They went further than
+this. They removed the fine tombs and altars, as well
+as the choir stalls, from the church of the Grey Friars,
+where mingled the ashes of some of the noblest and
+best in the land. There was some excuse, however,
+for these acts. The house and church of the Grey
+Friars had been granted to the City at the close of
+the last reign on the express condition that the
+churches of St. Nicholas and St. Ewin should be
+abolished, and that the church of the Grey Friars
+should be established as a parish church in their
+place under the name of Christ Church. It was
+probably in order to render the old monastic church
+more convenient as a parish church that they removed
+much of what to the antiquary of to-day would
+have seemed of priceless value, and at the same time
+reduced the dimensions of the choir.<a id="noteref_1290" name="noteref_1290" href="#note_1290"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1290</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The "communion" substituted for the mass, 1548.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">At Easter, 1548, a new communion service in
+English took the place of the mass.<a id="noteref_1291" name="noteref_1291" href="#note_1291"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1291</span></span></a> At the election<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page429">[pg 429]</span><a name="Pg429" id="Pg429" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc239" id="toc239"></a>
+of the mayor on the following Michaelmas-day, on
+which occasion a mass had always been celebrated at
+the Guildhall Chapel since the time of Whitington, an
+endeavour appears to have been made by the Court
+of Aldermen to effect a compromise between mass
+and communion, for whilst it ordered that a mass of
+the Holy Ghost should be solemnly sung in English
+in the Guildhall Chapel (which had been confiscated
+by Henry VIII)<a id="noteref_1292" name="noteref_1292" href="#note_1292"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1292</span></span></a> as theretofore, it further ordered
+that the holy communion should be administered to
+two or three of the priests there at the same mass.<a id="noteref_1293" name="noteref_1293" href="#note_1293"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1293</span></span></a>
+Orders were issued by the king's council that candles
+should no longer be carried about on Candlemas-day,
+ashes on Ash Wednesday, palms on Palm Sunday.
+These practices were now considered superstitious, as
+also was the "sensyng" which hitherto had taken
+place in St. Paul's at Whitsuntide, but which the
+Court of Aldermen now decreed to be abolished, and
+the preaching of sermons substituted in its place.<a id="noteref_1294" name="noteref_1294" href="#note_1294"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1294</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%"> The "tuning of the pulpits."</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The people were at this time extremely distracted
+by the various and contradictory opinions of their
+preachers; and as they were totally incapable of judging
+of the force of arguments adduced on one side or
+the other, but conceived that everything spoken from
+the pulpit was of equal authority, great confusion and
+perplexity of mind ensued. In order to "tune the<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page430">[pg 430]</span><a name="Pg430" id="Pg430" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+pulpits" and to effect uniformity of doctrine and
+service, the Lord Protector resorted to proclamations,
+which, although no longer having the authority of
+statutes as in the reign of Henry VIII, practically
+answered the same purpose. Preaching was thus
+restricted to those who had previously obtained a
+licence from the king, his visitors, the archbishop of
+Canterbury, or the bishop of the diocese.<a id="noteref_1295" name="noteref_1295" href="#note_1295"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1295</span></span></a> The same
+want of uniformity which appeared in the preachers
+appeared also in their congregations; some "kepte
+holy day and manny kepte none, but dyd worke
+opynly, and in some churches servys and some none,
+soche was the devysyon."<a id="noteref_1296" name="noteref_1296" href="#note_1296"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1296</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The insurrections of 1549.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">In the meantime great discontent had been caused
+by the Protector's measures. The rich nobleman and
+country gentleman said nothing, for their assent had
+been purchased by gifts of church property, but the
+tenants and bourgeois class suffered from increased
+rents, from enclosures and evictions. Church lands
+had always been underlet; the monks were easy
+landlords. Not so the new proprietors of the confiscated
+abbey lands, they were determined to make
+the most out of their newly-acquired property.<a id="noteref_1297" name="noteref_1297" href="#note_1297"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1297</span></span></a>
+Insurrection broke out in various parts of the<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page431">[pg 431]</span><a name="Pg431" id="Pg431" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc240" id="toc240"></a>
+country. Not only were enclosures thrown open and
+fences removed, but a cry was raised for the restoration
+of the old religion. Information of what was
+taking place was sent to Sir Henry Amcotes, the
+mayor, and steps were at once taken (2 July, 1549)
+for putting the city into a state of defence and for the
+preservation of the king's peace. A "false draw-brydge"
+was ordered (<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">inter alia</span></span>) to be made for
+London Bridge "in case nede should requyer by reason
+"of the sterrynge of the people (which God defende!)
+to caste downe thother."<a id="noteref_1298" name="noteref_1298" href="#note_1298"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1298</span></span></a> The city gates were constantly
+watched and the walls mounted with artillery.<a id="noteref_1299" name="noteref_1299" href="#note_1299"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1299</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Cranmer at St. Paul's, 21 July, 1549.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">In the midst of these preparations there was a
+lull. On the 21st day of July, being the 6th Sunday
+after Trinity, came Archbishop Cranmer to St. Paul's.
+He wore no vestment save a cope over an alb, and
+bore neither mitre nor cross, but only a staff. He
+conducted the whole of the service as set out in the
+"king's book" recently published, which differed but
+slightly from the church service in use at the present
+day, and he administered the "Communion" to himself,
+the dean and others, according to Act of Parliament.
+The mayor and most of the aldermen occupied
+seats in the choir. Cranmer's object in coming to the
+city on that day was to exhort the citizens to obey the
+king as the supreme head of the realm, and to pray the
+Almighty to avert the trouble with which, for their
+sins, they were threatened.<a id="noteref_1300" name="noteref_1300" href="#note_1300"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1300</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The king passes through the city, 23 July.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Two days later (23 July) the king himself left
+Greenwich and rode through the city to Westminster,<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page432">[pg 432]</span><a name="Pg432" id="Pg432" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+accompanied by the Lord Protector and other nobles.
+The mayor and aldermen rode out to Southwark, the
+former in a gown of crimson velvet, the latter in
+gowns of scarlet, to meet the royal party, and conducted
+it as far as Charing Cross, where the aldermen took
+their leave, the king saluting them and "putting of
+his capp to everie of them." The mayor rode on to
+Westminster, where the king and the Protector
+graciously bade him farewell.<a id="noteref_1301" name="noteref_1301" href="#note_1301"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1301</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Ket's rebellion in Norfolk. 1549.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The aspect of affairs began to look black indeed.
+By the end of the month Exeter was being besieged
+by the rebels, and on the 8th August the French
+ambassador, taking advantage of the general distraction,
+bade the Lord Protector open defiance at
+Whitehall.<a id="noteref_1302" name="noteref_1302" href="#note_1302"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1302</span></span></a> At midnight instructions were sent to
+the mayor to seize all Frenchmen in the city who
+were not denizens, together with their property.
+By this time, however, Exeter had been relieved and
+the insurrection in the west had been put down.
+The western insurgents had demanded the restoration
+of the mass and the abolition of the English liturgy.
+Contemporaneously with this religious movement
+another agitation was being made in the eastern
+counties, and more especially in Norfolk, which had
+for its object the destruction of enclosures. With the
+eastern rebels, who placed themselves under the
+leadership of Robert Ket, a tanner of Wymondham,
+the Protector himself sympathized at heart, and the
+council had to exercise no little pressure before he
+could be induced to send an efficient force to put them
+down. At length the rebels were met and defeated<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page433">[pg 433]</span><a name="Pg433" id="Pg433" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc241" id="toc241"></a>
+by a force under the command of the Earl of
+Warwick, the son of the extortionate Dudley who
+was associated with Empson in oppressing the city
+towards the close of the reign of Henry VII. Ket
+galloped off the field, leaving his followers to be
+ridden down and killed by the earl's horsemen. He
+was shortly afterwards captured in a barn, and
+eventually brought up to London, together with his
+brother William, and committed to the Tower.
+Being arraigned and convicted of treason, they were
+handed over to the high sheriff of Norfolk and Suffolk.
+Robert was hanged in chains on the top of Norwich
+Castle, whilst his brother William suffered a similar
+fate on the top of Wymondham Steeple.<a id="noteref_1303" name="noteref_1303" href="#note_1303"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1303</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The fall of Somerset, 1549.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Somerset's fall was now imminent. The citizens
+hated him, not for his favouring the reformers, but
+for the injury he had caused to trade and for his
+having bebased the coinage still further than it had
+been debased by Henry VIII. His colleagues in the
+council, who had been pampered with gifts of church
+lands, were angry with him for the favour he had
+shown towards those who raised the outcry against
+enclosures, and they began to show their independence.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Letter from lords of the council to the City accusing the Protector, 6 Oct.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">On the afternoon of Sunday, the 6th October,
+1549, a letter was sent to the mayor subscribed by
+Lord St. John, the president of the council, the earls
+of Warwick, Southampton and Arundel, and other
+members of the council, containing a long indictment
+of the Protector's policy and conduct. He was proud,
+covetous and ambitious. He had embezzled the pay
+of the soldiers, with which he was building sumptuous<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page434">[pg 434]</span><a name="Pg434" id="Pg434" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+houses in four or five different places. Whilst sowing
+discord among the nobles, he flattered the commons
+to the intent that, having got rid of the former, he
+might with the aid of the latter achieve his scarcely
+veiled design of supplanting the king himself. They
+had hoped, the letter continues, to have persuaded
+the duke by fair means to take order for the security
+of the king's person and the commonwealth; but no
+sooner was the matter broached to the duke than he
+showed himself determined to appeal to the arbitrament
+of the sword. Such being the case, they on
+their part were no less resolved, with God's help, to
+deliver the king and the realm from impending ruin,
+or perish in the attempt. They concluded by asking
+the civic authorities to see that good watch and ward
+were kept in the city and that no <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">matériel</span></span> of war
+was supplied to the duke or his followers. Any
+letters or proclamations coming from the Protector
+were to be disregarded.<a id="noteref_1304" name="noteref_1304" href="#note_1304"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1304</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Letter from Somerset to the mayor, 6 Oct., 1549.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Determined not to be forestalled by his enemies;
+the duke himself wrote the same day (6 Oct.) to the
+mayor desiring the City to furnish him forthwith with
+1,000 trusty men fully armed for the protection of the
+king's person. The men were to be forwarded to
+him at Hampton by the following Monday mid-day
+at the latest, and in the meantime the citizens were
+to take steps to protect the king and his uncle, the
+duke, against conspiracy.<a id="noteref_1305" name="noteref_1305" href="#note_1305"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1305</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Conference between the lords and the City at Ely Place, 6 Oct., 1549.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Before these letters had been despatched the
+mayor and aldermen had been summoned by the
+Earl of Warwick, who now took the lead against<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page435">[pg 435]</span><a name="Pg435" id="Pg435" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc242" id="toc242"></a>
+Somerset, to meet him and other lords of the council
+at his house in Ely Place, Holborn. A meeting had
+accordingly taken place that Sunday morning, when
+the state of affairs was discussed. After the meeting
+separated Warwick came to the city and took up
+his residence in the house of Sir John York, one of
+the sheriffs, situate in Walbrook. Sir John Markham,
+lieutenant of the Tower, was removed, and Sir
+Leonard Chamberlain appointed in his place, whilst
+the Court of Aldermen took extraordinary precautions
+for safe-guarding the city.<a id="noteref_1306" name="noteref_1306" href="#note_1306"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1306</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Removal of the king to Windsor.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">As soon as Somerset was made aware of the
+Tower being in the possession of his rivals he
+removed from Hampton Court to Windsor, carrying
+the young king with him, and despatched a letter to
+Lord Russell to hurry thither with such force as he
+could muster.<a id="noteref_1307" name="noteref_1307" href="#note_1307"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1307</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The City joins the lords against Somerset, 7 Oct., 1549.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">On Monday (7 Oct.) the lords of the council
+sat at Mercers' Hall—they felt safer in London—and
+thence despatched a dutiful letter to the king, and
+another (explaining their conduct) to Cranmer.<a id="noteref_1308" name="noteref_1308" href="#note_1308"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1308</span></span></a> The
+Common Council met at seven o'clock that morning,
+having been warned on Sunday night.<a id="noteref_1309" name="noteref_1309" href="#note_1309"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1309</span></span></a> The object of
+their meeting so early in the day was that no time
+might be lost before taking into consideration the
+letters that had been received from Somerset and
+from the lords. After due deliberation the citizens
+agreed to throw in their lot with the lords and to
+assist them "to the uttermost of their wills and<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page436">[pg 436]</span><a name="Pg436" id="Pg436" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+powers" in the maintenance and defence of the
+king's person.<a id="noteref_1310" name="noteref_1310" href="#note_1310"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1310</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The lords attend a Common Council, 8 Oct., 1549.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">On Tuesday (8 Oct.) the Common Council again
+assembled in the Guildhall to meet the lords by
+appointment. Rumour had been spread to the effect
+that it was the intention of the lords to cause a reestablishment
+of the old religion.<a id="noteref_1311" name="noteref_1311" href="#note_1311"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1311</span></span></a> This the lords
+assured the meeting was far from their minds. They
+intended no alteration of matters as established by
+the laws and statutes. All they wanted was to cause
+them to be maintained as formerly, before they had
+been "disformed" by the Lord Protector, and for this
+they prayed the assistance of the citizens. Thereupon
+the mayor, aldermen and common council,
+thanking God for the good intentions of their lordships,
+"promised their ayde and helpe to the uttermost
+of their lieves and goodes."<a id="noteref_1312" name="noteref_1312" href="#note_1312"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1312</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">A meeting at Sheriff York's house, 9 Oct.</span></div></div>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The City agrees to furnish a contingent of soldiers to aid the lords.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">On Wednesday (9 Oct.) the lords met at the
+house of Sheriff York, where they had dined the
+previous day.<a id="noteref_1313" name="noteref_1313" href="#note_1313"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1313</span></span></a> They had heard that Somerset had
+seized all the armour, weapons and munitions of war
+he could lay his hands upon, both at Hampton Court
+and Windsor, and with them had armed his adherents.
+They again sent letters to the king, the archbishop
+and others, and declared Somerset to be unworthy to
+continue any longer in the position of Protector.<a id="noteref_1314" name="noteref_1314" href="#note_1314"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1314</span></span></a>
+The Common Council, which met the same day—"for
+divers urgent causes moved and declared by the
+mouth of the recorder and of the lord mayor and
+aldermen on the king's behalf"—agreed to furnish<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page437">[pg 437]</span><a name="Pg437" id="Pg437" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc243" id="toc243"></a>
+with all speed 500 men, or if necessary 1,000 men,
+well harnessed and weaponed, to proceed to Windsor
+Castle for the delivery and preservation of his majesty.
+It was subsequently arranged that 100 of the contingent
+should be horsemen.<a id="noteref_1315" name="noteref_1315" href="#note_1315"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1315</span></span></a> By the afternoon of
+Friday (11 Oct.) the men and horsemen were ready.
+They mustered in Moorfields, whence they marched
+through Moorgate, Coleman Street, Cheapside, and
+out by Newgate to Smithfield, with the Sword-bearer
+riding before them as captain. At Smithfield they broke
+off, and were discharged from further service
+for the time.<a id="noteref_1316" name="noteref_1316" href="#note_1316"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1316</span></span></a> There is no evidence to show that the
+force was ever called upon to proceed to Windsor.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The effect of the City's adhesion to the lords.</span></div></div>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Somerset brought to the Tower, 14 Oct.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The adhesion of the City to the lords had in the
+meanwhile added strength to their cause, many who
+had at first held back now declaring themselves against
+Somerset. In this manner they were joined by Lord
+Chancellor Rich, the Earl of Shrewsbury, Chief Justice
+Montague and others, whose signatures appear to a
+proclamation issued on the 8th October setting forth
+"the verye trowth of the Duke of Somersettes evell
+government and false and detestable procedynges."<a id="noteref_1317" name="noteref_1317" href="#note_1317"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1317</span></span></a>
+By the end of the week (12 Oct.) the lords felt
+themselves strong enough to proceed in person to
+Windsor, where on their knees they explained their
+conduct to the king, who received them graciously and<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page438">[pg 438]</span><a name="Pg438" id="Pg438" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+gave them hearty thanks. The following day (Sunday)
+was spent in removing some of Somerset's followers;
+and on Monday (14th) Somerset himself was brought
+prisoner to London, "riding through Oldborne in at
+Newgate and so to the Tower of London, accompanied
+with diuers lordes and gentlemen with 300
+horse, the lord maior, Sir Ralph Warren, Sir John
+Gresham, Mr. Recorder, Sir William Locke and both
+the shiriffes and other knights, sitting on their horses
+agaynst Soper-lane, with all the officers with halbards,
+and from Oldborne bridge to the Tower certaine
+aldermen or their deputies on horsebacke in
+every streete, with a number of housholders standing
+with bils as hee passed."<a id="noteref_1318" name="noteref_1318" href="#note_1318"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1318</span></span></a></p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">At the sudden fall of one who for a short time
+had been all powerful—a little more than a week had
+served to deprive him of the protectorate and render
+him a prisoner in the Tower—did it cross the mind of
+any of the onlookers that he it was who carried away
+from the Guildhall Library some cartloads of books
+which were never returned?</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Bonner deprived of bishopric of London, 1 Oct., 1549.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">There were some who looked upon Somerset's
+fall as an act of God's vengeance for his having caused
+Bonner to be deprived of his bishopric of London.
+On the 1st September last Bonner had preached at
+Paul's Cross against the king's supremacy. Information
+of the matter was given to the council, and
+Bonner was called upon to answer for his conduct
+before Cranmer and the rest of the commissioners.
+The informers on this occasion were William Latymer,<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page439">[pg 439]</span><a name="Pg439" id="Pg439" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc244" id="toc244"></a>
+the parson of the church of St. Laurence Pountney,
+and John Hooper, a zealous Protestant, who afterwards
+became Bishop of Gloucester. Whilst under
+examination before the commissioners Bonner was
+confined in the Marshalsea. Hooper in the meantime
+was put up by Cranmer to preach at Paul's Cross,
+and he took the opportunity thus afforded him of
+inveighing strongly against Bonner's conduct. Bonner
+failed to satisfy the commissioners, and on the 1st
+October was deprived of office and committed to
+prison during the king's pleasure. "But marke what
+followeth," writes the chronicler of the Grey Friars,
+within a week "was proclaymyd the protector a
+traytor."<a id="noteref_1319" name="noteref_1319" href="#note_1319"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1319</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The king entertained by Sheriff York, Oct., 1549.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">On the 17th October Edward came from Hampton
+Court to Southwark Place, a mansion formerly
+belonging to Charles Brandon, Duke of Suffolk, when
+it was known as Suffolk House. It was now used in
+part as a mint, and was occupied by Sheriff York in
+his capacity as master of the king's mint. After
+dinner the king knighted York in recognition of his
+hospitality and his past services, an honour personal
+to York and not extended to his colleague in the
+shrievalty, Richard Turke. From Southwark Edward
+set forth to ride through the city to Westminster,
+accompanied by a long cavalcade of nobles and gentlemen,
+"the lord mayor bearinge the scepter before his
+maiestie and rydinge with garter kinge of armes."<a id="noteref_1320" name="noteref_1320" href="#note_1320"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1320</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Somerset released on parole, 6 Feb., 1550.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Somerset's confinement in the Tower was not of
+long duration. On the 6th February, 1550, the
+lieutenant of the Tower received orders to bring his<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page440">[pg 440]</span><a name="Pg440" id="Pg440" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+prisoner "with out greate garde or busyness" to Sheriff
+York's house in Walbrook, where the council was
+sitting; and on the duke entering into a recognisance
+to remain privately either at Shene or Sion, and not
+to travel more than four miles from either place, nor
+attempt to gain an interview with the young king, he
+was allowed to depart.<a id="noteref_1321" name="noteref_1321" href="#note_1321"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1321</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Warwick and the reformers, 1550.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">With Warwick, who became the ruling spirit of
+the council after the fall of Somerset and the abolition
+of the protectorate, religion was a matter of supreme
+indifference, and for a time it was uncertain whether
+he would favour the followers of the old religion or
+the advanced reformers. He chose to extend his
+patronage to the latter. The day after Somerset's
+release from the Tower, Bonner was again brought
+from the Marshalsea, where he had been roughly used,<a id="noteref_1322" name="noteref_1322" href="#note_1322"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1322</span></span></a>
+and the cause of his deprivation reconsidered by the
+lords of the council sitting in the Star Chamber, the
+result being that the previous sentence by Cranmer
+was confirmed and Bonner again relegated to prison.
+Bishops were now appointed directly by the king,
+who in the following April caused Nicholas Ridley,
+bishop of Rochester, to be transferred to London in
+Bonner's place; and the see of Westminster,<a id="noteref_1323" name="noteref_1323" href="#note_1323"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1323</span></span></a> which<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page441">[pg 441]</span><a name="Pg441" id="Pg441" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc245" id="toc245"></a>
+had been created in 1540, was united to London. In
+July Hooper was nominated to the see of Gloucester;
+but some time elapsed before this rigid reformer could
+be induced to overcome his prejudice to episcopal
+vestments (which he denounced as the livery of Anti-Christ)
+and consent to be consecrated in them.<a id="noteref_1324" name="noteref_1324" href="#note_1324"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1324</span></span></a> As
+soon as the ceremony was over he cast them off.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The City and the borough of Southwark, 1550.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">For some time past the City had experienced
+difficulty in exercising its franchise in the borough of
+Southwark. That borough consisted of three manors,
+known respectively as the Guildable Manor, the
+King's Manor and the Great Liberty Manor.<a id="noteref_1325" name="noteref_1325" href="#note_1325"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1325</span></span></a> The
+first of these—and only the first—had been granted
+to the City by Edward III soon after his accession.
+The civic authorities had complained of felons making
+good their escape from the city to Southwark, where
+they could not be attacked by the officers of the city;
+and the king, in answer to the City's request, had made
+over to them the town or vill of Southwark.<a id="noteref_1326" name="noteref_1326" href="#note_1326"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1326</span></span></a> This
+grant was afterwards confirmed and amplified by
+a charter granted by Edward IV in 1462, whereby
+the citizens were allowed to hold a yearly fair in the
+borough on three successive days in the month of
+September, together with a court of pie-powder, and
+with all liberties and customs to such fair appertaining.<a id="noteref_1327" name="noteref_1327" href="#note_1327"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1327</span></span></a>
+In course of time the City claimed the right of holding
+a market, as well as the yearly fair, twice a week in<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page442">[pg 442]</span><a name="Pg442" id="Pg442" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+Southwark. This claim now led to difficulties with
+the king's bailiff, Sir John Gate. A draft agreement
+had been drawn up during Somerset's protectorate in
+the hopes of arranging matters,<a id="noteref_1328" name="noteref_1328" href="#note_1328"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1328</span></span></a> but apparently without
+success.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Charter to the City, 23 April, 1550.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">At length the city agreed (29 March, 1550) to make
+an offer of 500 marks for the purchase of the rights of
+the Crown in Southwark,<a id="noteref_1329" name="noteref_1329" href="#note_1329"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1329</span></span></a> and eventually a compromise
+was effected. For the sum of £647 2<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">s.</span></span> 1<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">d.</span></span>
+the king conveyed by charter<a id="noteref_1330" name="noteref_1330" href="#note_1330"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1330</span></span></a> to the City of London
+divers messuages in Southwark, with the exception of
+"Southwark Place" and the gardens belonging to it,
+formerly the Duke of Suffolk's mansion, and for a
+further sum of 500 marks he surrendered all the royal
+liberties and franchises which he or his heirs might
+have in the borough or town of Southwark. It was
+expressly provided that this charter was not to be
+prejudicial to Sir John Gate or to his property and
+interests. The ancient rent of £10 per annum was
+still to be paid, and the citizens were to be allowed
+to hold four markets every week in addition to a fair
+and court of pie-powder enjoyed since the time of
+Edward IV. On the 9th May the lord mayor took
+formal possession of the borough of Southwark by
+riding through the precinct, after which the Common
+Cryer made proclamation with sound of trumpet for<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page443">[pg 443]</span><a name="Pg443" id="Pg443" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc246" id="toc246"></a>
+all vagabonds to leave the city and borough and the
+suburbs and liberties of the same.<a id="noteref_1331" name="noteref_1331" href="#note_1331"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1331</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The ward of Bridge Without.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">It was originally intended, no doubt, that the
+borough should be incorporated for all municipal
+purposes with the city, and that the inhabitants of
+the borough should be placed on the same footing as
+the citizens. This, however, was never carried out.
+Notwithstanding the fact that among the ordinances
+drawn up (31 July) for the government of the
+borough,<a id="noteref_1332" name="noteref_1332" href="#note_1332"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1332</span></span></a> there was one which prescribed the same
+customary procedure in the election of an alderman
+for the new ward of Bridge Without as prevailed in
+the city;<a id="noteref_1333" name="noteref_1333" href="#note_1333"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1333</span></span></a> the inhabitants of the borough have never
+taken any part in the election of an alderman. The
+first alderman, Sir John Aylyff, a barber-surgeon, was
+"nominated, elected and chosen" by the Court of
+Aldermen,<a id="noteref_1334" name="noteref_1334" href="#note_1334"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1334</span></span></a> and was admitted and sworn before the
+same body on the 28th May, 1850—that is to say,
+some weeks before the ordinances just mentioned
+were drawn up.</p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The alderman of the ward continued to be
+nominated and elected by the Court of Aldermen<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page444">[pg 444]</span><a name="Pg444" id="Pg444" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+until 1711, when, by virtue of an Act of Common
+Council, the ward was to be offered to the several aldermen
+who had served as mayor, in order of seniority. If
+no alderman could be found willing to be translated
+from his own ward to that of Bridge Without, the
+Court of Common Council was empowered by another
+Act passed in 1725 to proceed to the election of an
+alderman.</p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The ward of Bridge Without has never sent
+representatives to the Common Council, inasmuch as
+its inhabitants refused to "take up their freedom"
+and bear the burdens of citizenship, and there existed no
+means for forcing the freedom upon them. In 1835,
+however, a petition was presented to the Common
+Council by certain inhabitants of Southwark asking
+that they might for the future exercise the right of
+electing not only an alderman, but common council-men
+for the ward, and that the ordinances of 1550
+might be carried out according to their original
+intention. The petition was referred to the Committee
+for General Purposes, who reported to the
+Common Council<a id="noteref_1335" name="noteref_1335" href="#note_1335"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1335</span></span></a> to the effect that, considering that
+the borough of Southwark had never formed part of
+the City of London, the charter of Edward VI notwithstanding,
+and that the holding of wardmotes in
+the borough would materially interfere with the duties
+of an ancient officer known as a seneschal or steward
+of Southwark, the petition could not be complied with,
+except by application to the legislature, and that such
+a course would neither be expedient or advisable.
+Another petition to the same effect has quite recently<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page445">[pg 445]</span><a name="Pg445" id="Pg445" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc247" id="toc247"></a>
+been presented to the Court of Aldermen; but it was
+equally unsuccessful.<a id="noteref_1336" name="noteref_1336" href="#note_1336"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1336</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Growing unpopularity of Warwick, 1550-1551.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Warwick had not long taken the place of
+Somerset before he found himself compelled to make
+peace with France (29 March, 1550). This he accomplished
+only by consenting to surrender Boulogne.
+The declaration of peace was celebrated with bonfires
+in the city, although the conditions under which
+the peace was effected were generally unacceptable
+to the nation and brought discredit upon the earl.<a id="noteref_1337" name="noteref_1337" href="#note_1337"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1337</span></span></a>
+One result of the conclusion of the war was again
+to flood the streets of the city with men who openly
+declared that they neither could nor would work,
+and that unless the king provided them with a
+livelihood they would combine to plunder the city,
+and once clear with their booty they cared not if
+10,000 men were after them. It was in vain that
+proclamation was made for all disbanded soldiers to
+leave the city. They refused to go, and oftentimes
+came into conflict with the city constables. At length
+the mayor and aldermen addressed a letter on the
+subject to the lords of the council (25 Sept.).<a id="noteref_1338" name="noteref_1338" href="#note_1338"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1338</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The debasement of the currency, 1551.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">In the following year the state of the city was
+rendered worse by a proposal of Warwick to debase
+the currency yet more. As soon as the proposal got
+wind up went the price of provisions, in spite of every
+effort made by the lords of the council to keep it
+down. They sent for the mayor (Sir Andrew Judd) to<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page446">[pg 446]</span><a name="Pg446" id="Pg446" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+attend them at Greenwich on Sunday, the 10th May,
+and soundly rated him—or, as the chronicler puts
+it, "gave him some sore words"—for allowing such
+things to take place. On Thursday, the 28th, the
+mayor summoned a Common Council, when the
+Recorder repeated to them the king's orders that the
+price of wares was not to be raised. The livery
+companies were to see to it, and there were to be
+no more murmurings.<a id="noteref_1339" name="noteref_1339" href="#note_1339"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1339</span></span></a></p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Warwick himself excited the anger of the city burgesses
+by riding through the streets to see if the king's
+orders against the enhancement of the price of victuals
+were being carried out. Coming one day to a butcher's
+in Eastcheap, he asked the price of a sheep. Being
+told that it was 13 shillings, he replied that it was too
+much and passed on. When another butcher asked
+16 shillings he was told to go and be hanged. The
+earl's conduct so roused the indignation of the butchers
+of the city—a class of men scarcely less powerful than
+their brethren the fishmongers—that they made no
+secret that the price of meat would be raised still
+more if the debasement of the currency was carried
+out as proposed.<a id="noteref_1340" name="noteref_1340" href="#note_1340"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1340</span></span></a> Yet, in spite of all remonstrances
+and threats, a proclamation went forth that after the
+17th August the shilling should be current for six pence
+sterling and no more, the groat for two pence, the
+penny for a halfpenny, and the halfpenny for a farthing.<a id="noteref_1341" name="noteref_1341" href="#note_1341"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1341</span></span></a>
+The price of every commodity rose 50 per
+cent. as a matter of course, and nothing that Warwick<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page447">[pg 447]</span><a name="Pg447" id="Pg447" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc248" id="toc248"></a>
+could do could prevent it. Seeing at last the hopelessness
+of attempting to overcome economic laws by
+a mere <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">ipse dixit</span></span>, he caused a "contrary proclamasyon"
+to be issued, and "sette alle at lyberty agayne, and
+every viteler to selle as they wolde and had done
+before."<a id="noteref_1342" name="noteref_1342" href="#note_1342"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1342</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The Duke of Somerset again arrested, 16 Oct., 1551.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Warwick's increasing unpopularity raised a hope
+in the breast of Somerset of recovering his lost power.
+Some rash words he had allowed to escape were
+carried to the young king, who took the part of
+Warwick against his own uncle, and showed his
+appreciation of the earl's services by creating him
+Duke of Northumberland (11 Oct.). A few days later
+Somerset was seized and again committed to the
+Tower.<a id="noteref_1343" name="noteref_1343" href="#note_1343"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1343</span></span></a> The new duke vaunted himself more than
+ever, and as a fresh coinage was on the eve of being
+issued, he caused it to be struck with a ragged staff,
+the badge of his house, on its face.<a id="noteref_1344" name="noteref_1344" href="#note_1344"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1344</span></span></a> Some of the
+duke's servants thought to ruffle it as well as their
+master, and offered an insult to one of the sheriffs,
+attempting to snatch at his chain of office as he
+accompanied the mayor to service at St. Paul's on
+All Saints' Day, and otherwise creating no little
+disturbance in St. Paul's Churchyard. The mayor
+waited until service was over, and then took them
+into custody.<a id="noteref_1345" name="noteref_1345" href="#note_1345"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1345</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Trial and execution of Somerset, 22 Jan., 1552.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">At the time of Somerset's second arrest the
+Common Council and the wardens of the several
+livery companies were summoned to meet at the
+Guildhall to hear why the duke had been sent for the<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page448">[pg 448]</span><a name="Pg448" id="Pg448" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+second time to the Tower, and to receive instructions
+for safe-guarding the city. They were informed by the
+Recorder that it had been the duke's intention to seize
+the Tower and the Isle of Wight, and to "have destroyed
+the city of London and the substantiall men
+of the same."<a id="noteref_1346" name="noteref_1346" href="#note_1346"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1346</span></span></a> This was, of course, an exaggeration,
+although there is little doubt that the duke was preparing
+to get himself named again Protector by the
+next parliament. On the 1st December he was
+brought from the Tower by water to Westminster,
+the mayor and aldermen having received strict orders
+to keep the city well guarded.<a id="noteref_1347" name="noteref_1347" href="#note_1347"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1347</span></span></a> He was arraigned of
+treason and felony, but his judges, among whom sat
+his enemy Northumberland himself, acquitted him of
+the former charge, and those in the hall, thinking he
+had been altogether acquitted, raised a shout of joy
+that could be heard as far as Charing Cross and Long
+Acre. When they discovered that he had been found
+guilty of felony and condemned to be executed they
+were grievously disappointed. As he landed at the
+Crane in the Vintry on his way back to the Tower
+that evening, and passed through Candlewick (Cannon)
+Street, the people, we are told, cried "'God save him'
+all the way as he went, thinkinge that he had clerely
+bene quitt, but they were deceyved, but hoopinge
+he should have the kinge's pardon."<a id="noteref_1348" name="noteref_1348" href="#note_1348"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1348</span></span></a> According to
+another chronicler there were mingled cries of joy and
+sorrow as he passed through London, some crying for
+joy that he was acquitted, whilst others (who were
+better informed of the actual state of the case)<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page449">[pg 449]</span><a name="Pg449" id="Pg449" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc249" id="toc249"></a>
+lamented his conviction.<a id="noteref_1349" name="noteref_1349" href="#note_1349"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1349</span></span></a> His execution took place
+on Tower Hill in January of the next year (1552).</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The City and the Royal Hospitals, 1547-1553.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">In the meanwhile the civic authorities had been
+energetically engaged in making regulations for the
+hospital of the poor in West Smithfield, better known
+as St. Bartholomew's Hospital, which they had recently
+acquired, and in grappling with the poverty and sickness
+with which they were surrounded. Instead of
+trusting to the charity of those attending the parish
+churches on Sunday for raising money for the poor,
+the Common Council, in September, 1547, resorted to
+the less precarious method of levying on every inhabitant
+of the city one half of a fifteenth for the maintenance
+of the poor of the hospital.<a id="noteref_1350" name="noteref_1350" href="#note_1350"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1350</span></span></a> The voluntary
+system, however, was not wholly abolished. In the
+following April (1548) a brotherhood for the relief of
+the poor had been established, to which the mayor (Sir
+John Gresham) and most of the aldermen belonged,
+each agreeing to subscribe a yearly sum varying from
+half a mark to a mark.<a id="noteref_1351" name="noteref_1351" href="#note_1351"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1351</span></span></a> In September governors
+were appointed of St. Bartholomew's Hospital—four
+aldermen and eight commoners<a id="noteref_1352" name="noteref_1352" href="#note_1352"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1352</span></span></a>—and in the following
+December the Common Council passed an Act for the
+payment of 500 marks a year to the hospital, the sum
+being levied on the livery companies.<a id="noteref_1353" name="noteref_1353" href="#note_1353"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1353</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">St. Thomas's Hospital.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">In 1551 the City succeeded in obtaining another
+hospital. This was the hospital in Southwark originally
+dedicated to Thomas Becket, but whose patron<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page450">[pg 450]</span><a name="Pg450" id="Pg450" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+saint was, after the Reformation, changed to St.
+Thomas the Apostle. Negotiations were opened in
+February with the lord chancellor for the purchase of
+this hospital.<a id="noteref_1354" name="noteref_1354" href="#note_1354"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1354</span></span></a> They proceeded so favourably that by
+the 12th August the hospital and church and part of
+their endowment were conveyed to the City by deed,
+whilst the rest of the endowment was transferred by
+another deed on the following day.<a id="noteref_1355" name="noteref_1355" href="#note_1355"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1355</span></span></a> The purchase-money
+amounted to nearly £2,500.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Christ's Hospital.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Having thus cared for the sick and the poor, the
+civic authorities next turned their attention to the
+conversion of a portion of the ground and buildings
+of the dissolved monastery of the Grey Friars into a
+hospital for the reception and education of fatherless
+and helpless children. In 1552 Sir Richard Dobbs<a id="noteref_1356" name="noteref_1356" href="#note_1356"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1356</span></span></a>
+was mayor. He took an active part in the charitable
+work that was then being carried on in the city, and
+his conduct so won the heart of Ridley that the
+bishop wrote from prison shortly before his death
+commending him in the highest possible terms:—"O
+Dobbs, Dobbs, alderman and knight, thou in thy
+year did'st win my heart for evermore, for that
+honourable act, that most blessed work of God,
+of the erection and setting up of Christ's Holy
+Hospitals, and truly religious houses which by thee
+and through thee were begun." In July the work
+of adapting the old buildings, rather than erecting
+new, was commenced, and in a few months the<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page451">[pg 451]</span><a name="Pg451" id="Pg451" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc250" id="toc250"></a>
+premises were sufficiently forward to admit of the
+reception of nearly 400 children. The charity was
+aided by the king's bestowal of the linen vestures
+used in the city prior to the Reformation, and at that
+time seized by the commissioners.<a id="noteref_1357" name="noteref_1357" href="#note_1357"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1357</span></span></a> Just as the close
+of the reign of Henry VIII had witnessed the reopening
+of the church of the Grey Friars under the
+name of Christchurch, and the celebration of the
+mass once more within its walls, so now the close of
+his son's short reign witnessed the restoration of their
+house and buildings, and their conversion, in the cause
+of education and charity, into Christ's Hospital.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Bridewell Hospital.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">There was yet another class of inhabitant to
+be provided for, namely, those who either could not
+or would not work. On behalf of these a deputation<a id="noteref_1358" name="noteref_1358" href="#note_1358"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1358</span></span></a>
+was appointed by the City to present a petition to
+the king that he would be pleased to grant the
+disused palace of Bridewell to the municipality for
+the purpose of turning it into a workhouse. The
+deputation was introduced by Ridley, who himself
+wrote in May of this year (1552) to secretary Cecil
+on the same subject.<a id="noteref_1359" name="noteref_1359" href="#note_1359"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1359</span></span></a> The efforts of the bishop and
+the deputation were rewarded with success. In the
+following spring (1553) the king not only consented
+to convey the palace to the municipal body, but
+further gave 700 marks and all the beds and bedding
+of his palace of the Savoy for the maintenance of<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page452">[pg 452]</span><a name="Pg452" id="Pg452" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+the workhouse.<a id="noteref_1360" name="noteref_1360" href="#note_1360"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1360</span></span></a> The City having thus become
+possessed of the several hospitals of St. Bartholomew,
+St. Thomas, Christ's and Bridewell, the king, a few
+days before his death, granted the mayor, aldermen
+and commonalty a charter of incorporation as
+governors of these Royal Hospitals in the city.<a id="noteref_1361" name="noteref_1361" href="#note_1361"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1361</span></span></a></p>
+</div>
+</div>
+
+<hr class="doublepage" /><div class="tei tei-div" style="margin-bottom: 5.00em; margin-top: 5.00em">
+<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page453">[pg 453]</span><a name="Pg453" id="Pg453" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+<a name="toc251" id="toc251"></a>
+<a name="pdf252" id="pdf252"></a>
+<h1 class="tei tei-head" style="text-align: left; margin-bottom: 3.46em; margin-top: 3.46em"><span style="font-size: 173%">CHAPTER XVI.</span></h1>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-div" style="margin-bottom: 4.00em; margin-top: 4.00em">
+<a name="toc253" id="toc253"></a><h2 class="tei tei-head" style="text-align: left; margin-bottom: 2.88em; margin-top: 2.88em"></h2>
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Northumberland's conspiracy, 1553.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The death of Edward VI took place on the 6th
+July, 1553, although it was not generally known until
+two days afterwards. By his father's will the Princess
+Mary became heiress to the throne. Northumberland
+was aware of this. He was equally aware that if
+Mary succeeded to her brother's crown matters might
+go hard with him. He therefore persuaded Edward
+to follow the precedent set by his father and re-settle
+the succession to the crown by will. He succeeded
+moreover in getting the late king to name as his successor
+the Lady Jane Grey, grand-daughter of Mary
+Duchess of Suffolk, the younger sister of Henry VIII,
+and he took the further precaution of marrying her to
+his own son, Lord Guildford Dudley. It was in vain
+that the judges and law officers of the Crown pointed
+out that the Act of Parliament which authorised
+Henry to dispose of the crown by will, in the case of
+his children dying without heirs, did not apply to
+Edward. Councillors and judges, and even Cranmer
+himself, were forced to signify their assent by subscribing
+to the will, which was dated (21 June) a
+fortnight only before Edward's death.</p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Northumberland well knew the advantage to be
+got by securing the co-operation of the city in prosecuting
+his scheme, so he persuaded the mayor (Sir George
+Barnes), a number of aldermen (including Sir John
+Gresham, Sir Andrew Judd, Thomas Offley and Sir<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page454">[pg 454]</span><a name="Pg454" id="Pg454" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+Richard Dobbs), and several of the leading merchants
+of the city to append their signatures to the will.<a id="noteref_1362" name="noteref_1362" href="#note_1362"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1362</span></span></a>
+The king had been already dead two days before
+Northumberland sent for them to Greenwich and
+acquainted them of the fact, exhorting them at the
+same time to sign the document.<a id="noteref_1363" name="noteref_1363" href="#note_1363"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1363</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Lady Jane Grey proclaimed queen, 10 July, 1553.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">On the 10th July the Lady Jane was brought from
+Richmond and lodged in the Tower, and that same
+evening was proclaimed queen at the Cross in Chepe.
+The mayor took no part in the ceremony, and only
+one of the sheriffs (William Gerard or Garrard)
+attended the heralds. If Northumberland thought
+that the citizens would favour Lady Jane merely
+because she was a Protestant he was mistaken. The
+proclamation was received with undisguised coldness,
+and "few or none said God save her."<a id="noteref_1364" name="noteref_1364" href="#note_1364"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1364</span></span></a> Nor was it
+better received by the country at large. The eastern
+counties rose and in a few days Mary was at the
+head of 30,000 men. No time was to be lost, and
+Northumberland at once set out from London to
+meet her. As he passed through the city he noticed
+that none wished him "God speed."</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Queen Mary proclaimed, 19 July.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">No sooner was his back turned than the lords
+of the council, seeing how matters were going, and
+eager to throw off the yoke which the duke had
+placed on their necks, determined upon proclaiming
+Mary queen. It was necessary, however, that the
+City should first be informed of their intention, and<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page455">[pg 455]</span><a name="Pg455" id="Pg455" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc254" id="toc254"></a>
+that, too, without creating too much attention. One
+of their number therefore took the opportunity of
+the mayor riding abroad on Wednesday, the 19th
+July, to accost him privately and bid him and the
+sheriffs, and such of the aldermen as he could
+get together at short notice, to meet the lords
+of the council within an hour at the Earl of
+Pembroke's place at Castle Baynard. The mayor
+hurried back, sent for the Recorder and some of the
+aldermen, and with them proceeded to the place
+appointed, where they found the council assembled.
+They were informed of the intention of the lords, and
+the mayor was bidden to accompany them to Cheapside
+for the purpose of proclaiming Queen Mary.
+Their object soon got wind; a crowd followed them
+to Cheapside, and when the proclamation was made
+there was such a throwing up of caps and such cries
+of "God save Queen Mary" that nothing else could be
+heard. The civic authorities, as well as the lords of
+the council, thereupon proceeded to St. Paul's to hear
+a <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Te Deum</span></span>; after which the lords withdrew from the
+city, leaving orders, however, for Queen Mary to be
+proclaimed in other parts of the city according to
+custom. The next day (20 July) they returned and
+dined with the mayor, sitting in council, after dinner,
+until four o'clock in the afternoon, whilst the church
+bells rang all day long.<a id="noteref_1365" name="noteref_1365" href="#note_1365"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1365</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Northumberland sent to the Tower, 25 July.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">As soon as Northumberland heard of the turn
+affairs had taken, he caused Mary to be proclaimed
+at Cambridge, where he happened to be quartered,
+"castinge up his capp after as if he had bene joyfull
+of it." His simulated enthusiasm, however, availed<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page456">[pg 456]</span><a name="Pg456" id="Pg456" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+him nothing, and orders were issued for his arrest.
+Special precautions were taken to avoid disturbance
+on the day (25 July) that he passed through the city
+on his way to the Tower, every householder in the
+several wards through which he and his fellow
+prisoners were to pass being instructed to hold himself
+in readiness within doors with a clean halberd, and a
+bill or "pollox" for such service as the alderman
+might appoint.<a id="noteref_1366" name="noteref_1366" href="#note_1366"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1366</span></span></a> No disturbance took place, the
+populace contenting itself with cursing the duke and
+calling him traitor, and making him take off his hat as
+he passed through Bishopsgate and continue his
+journey bareheaded.<a id="noteref_1367" name="noteref_1367" href="#note_1367"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1367</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Queen Mary enters the city. 3 Aug.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">On the evening of the 3rd August Queen Mary
+made her first entry into the city, accompanied by
+her sister Elizabeth. She had come from Newhall,
+in Essex, where a few days before she had been
+presented with the sum of £500 in gold by a
+deputation of the Court of Aldermen accompanied by
+the Recorder.<a id="noteref_1368" name="noteref_1368" href="#note_1368"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1368</span></span></a> On the 2nd August it was decided
+that the lord mayor and his brethren should ride out
+the next afternoon to meet her majesty at the Bars
+without Aldgate, and taking their places appointed by
+the herald-of-arms, should accompany the royal procession.<a id="noteref_1369" name="noteref_1369" href="#note_1369"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1369</span></span></a>
+The reception which the new queen met
+with in the city must have been gratifying. The
+mayor, on approaching her, handed to her the civic
+sword, which was given to the Earl of Arundel to
+carry before her. The mayor himself bore the mace.
+By express permission of the Court of Aldermen a<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page457">[pg 457]</span><a name="Pg457" id="Pg457" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc255" id="toc255"></a>
+number of Florentine and other merchant strangers
+were allowed to attend on horseback, and to erect a
+pageant at Leadenhall.<a id="noteref_1370" name="noteref_1370" href="#note_1370"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1370</span></span></a> The whole length of the
+streets through which the queen had to pass on her
+way to the Tower had been lavishly decorated, and
+was lined with members of the various civic companies
+in their livery gowns. Nothing was omitted that
+could please the eye or ear.<a id="noteref_1371" name="noteref_1371" href="#note_1371"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1371</span></span></a></p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">A touching scene took place as Mary was about
+to enter the Tower. The widow of the Duke of
+Somerset, to whose policy as protector Mary had
+offered a steady opposition, met the queen at the
+Tower gate, and in company with the Duke of
+Norfolk, Stephen Gardiner and others, who had been
+confined in the Tower in the late reign, knelt down
+and saluted her. Mary, in a charitable mood, kissed
+each of them, claimed them as her own prisoners, and
+shortly afterwards granted them their liberty.<a id="noteref_1372" name="noteref_1372" href="#note_1372"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1372</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Mary releases the bishops and restores the mass.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">A week later (10 Aug.) the remains of the late
+king were carried from Whitehall to Westminster and
+laid in Henry the Seventh's Chapel, the service
+being conducted wholly in English, the communion
+taking the place of the mass, and the priests being
+vested in a surplice only, in accordance with the provisions
+of the Book of Common Prayer. For a short
+time after Mary's accession it was thought that she
+would be content if the Church were restored to the
+position it was in at the time when Henry VIII died.
+It was not long before the new queen shewed this
+opinion to be erroneous. The Prayer Book of King<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page458">[pg 458]</span><a name="Pg458" id="Pg458" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+Edward VI was set aside, the high altars that had
+been removed were restored, and mass was restored.
+Ridley was sent to the Tower and Bonner brought out
+from the Marshalsea and reinstated in the bishophric
+of London. Gardiner, who had been deprived of his
+see of Winchester and kept prisoner in the Tower, not
+only recovered his freedom and his see, but was made
+the queen's chancellor. On the other hand, Cranmer
+and "Mr. Latimer" were sent to the Tower.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Disturbances in the city.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The change that was being wrought caused some
+little disturbance in the city. When Doctor Bourne,
+who had been put up by the queen to preach at
+Paul's Cross one Sunday in August, began to pray for
+the dead, and to refer to Bonner's late imprisonment,
+one of his hearers threw a knife at him whilst others
+called the preacher a liar. The queen was so angry
+at this that she sent for the mayor and aldermen and
+told them plainly that she would deprive the city
+of its liberties if they could not better preserve peace
+and good order within its walls.<a id="noteref_1373" name="noteref_1373" href="#note_1373"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1373</span></span></a></p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">A few days later she issued a proclamation in
+which, whilst making no secret of her wish that
+everyone would conform to the religion "which all
+men knew she had of long tyme observed, and ment,
+God willing, to contynue the same," she deprecated
+men calling each other heretic or papist, but willed
+that everyone should follow the religion he thought
+best until further orders were taken.<a id="noteref_1374" name="noteref_1374" href="#note_1374"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1374</span></span></a> The mayor in
+the meantime had also issued his precept against any
+sermon or lecture being read other than the Divine<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page459">[pg 459]</span><a name="Pg459" id="Pg459" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc256" id="toc256"></a>
+Service appointed until the queen's further pleasure
+should be made known.<a id="noteref_1375" name="noteref_1375" href="#note_1375"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1375</span></span></a></p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Lest any disturbance should arise on the following
+Sunday (20 Aug.), when Bishop Gardiner's chaplain
+was to preach at Paul's Cross, the queen sent the
+captain of the guard with 200 men, who surrounded
+the pulpit, halberd in hand. The mayor, too, had
+ordered the livery companies to be present "to
+herken yf any leude or sedicious persons made any
+rumors"—a precaution which much pleased the
+queen.<a id="noteref_1376" name="noteref_1376" href="#note_1376"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1376</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Election of Thomas White mayor, 29 Sept., 1553.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">When Michaelmas-day (the day on which the
+election of the new mayor for the ensuing year was
+to take place) came round, the choice of the citizens
+fell upon Sir Thomas White.<a id="noteref_1377" name="noteref_1377" href="#note_1377"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1377</span></span></a> In accordance with
+the new order of things, the election was preceded by
+the celebration of mass in the Guildhall Chapel as
+of old.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The queen's coronation, 1 Oct.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The day after the election of the new mayor
+the queen passed through the city from the Tower
+to Whitehall for her coronation. The streets presented
+their usual gay appearance on this occasion,
+and the queen was made the recipient of the<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page460">[pg 460]</span><a name="Pg460" id="Pg460" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+"accustomed" gift of 1,000 marks on behalf of the
+city.<a id="noteref_1378" name="noteref_1378" href="#note_1378"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1378</span></span></a> On the day of the coronation (1 Oct.) the
+daily service at St. Paul's had to be suspended
+because all the priests not under censure for Protestantism
+or for having married were summoned to
+assist at Westminster.<a id="noteref_1379" name="noteref_1379" href="#note_1379"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1379</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Mary's first parliament, Oct.-Nov., 1553.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">When Mary appeared before her first parliament<a id="noteref_1380" name="noteref_1380" href="#note_1380"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1380</span></span></a>
+she found her subjects in many points opposed to her.
+They were willing to restore the worship and practice
+of the Church as they existed before the death of
+Henry VIII, but they showed a determination neither
+to submit to Rome nor to restore to the Church the
+property of which it had been deprived. They knew,
+moreover, of her anxious wish to marry Philip, son of
+the emperor Charles V, and yet did not hesitate to
+present to her a petition against a foreign marriage.
+It was a bold step for parliament to take in those
+days, and showed that it was determined to win back
+its ancient rights and no longer to be the tool of the
+crown. Mary was not one likely to yield in a matter
+on which she had once set her heart. Rather than
+take its advice she dissolved parliament. The result
+was an insurrection.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Trial at the Guildhall of Lady Jane Grey, Cranmer and others, Nov., 1553.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">In the meanwhile the aged Cranmer and the
+youthful Lady Jane Grey—she "that wolde a been
+qwene"—her husband and two of her husband's
+brothers had been brought to trial at the Guildhall<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page461">[pg 461]</span><a name="Pg461" id="Pg461" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc257" id="toc257"></a>
+(13 Nov). The axe was borne before them on their
+way from the Tower, as if in anticipation of the
+verdict. The Lady Jane is described as clad in a black
+gown, with velvet cap and black hood, having a black
+velvet book hanging at her girdle, whilst she carried
+another in her hand.<a id="noteref_1381" name="noteref_1381" href="#note_1381"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1381</span></span></a> Each of the accused pleaded
+guilty, and sentence of death was passed; its execution
+was, however, delayed owing to the outbreak known
+as Wyatt's Rebellion.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Outbreak of Wyatt's Rebellion. Jan., 1554.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The ostensible cause of the rebellion was the
+queen's determination at all hazards to marry Philip,
+whose ambassadors arrived at the opening of the new
+year (1554). The civic authorities had been warned
+to treat them handsomely, a warning which was
+scarcely necessary, for the citizens have never allowed
+political differences to interfere with their hospitality;
+and accordingly one of the ambassadors was lodged
+at Durham Place, near Charing Cross, another at the
+Duke of Suffolk's house hard by, whilst a third
+shared apartments with the chancellor "Nigro"
+(Philip Negri) in Sir Richard Sackville's house at
+the conduit in Fleet Street. To each and all of
+the guests the City sent presents of wax, torches,
+flour and every kind of meat, game and poultry.<a id="noteref_1382" name="noteref_1382" href="#note_1382"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1382</span></span></a>
+Formal announcement of the intended match was
+made by the chancellor on the 14th January, but
+it was received with every sign of discontent and
+misgiving, "yea and therat allmost eche man was<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page462">[pg 462]</span><a name="Pg462" id="Pg462" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+abashed, loking daylie for worse mattiers to growe
+shortly after."<a id="noteref_1383" name="noteref_1383" href="#note_1383"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1383</span></span></a> The following day (15 Jan.)—the
+day on which the rebellion under Wyatt broke
+out in Kent, to be followed by risings in Devonshire
+and Norfolk—the mayor and aldermen were summoned
+to court and ordered to bring with them forty
+of the chief commoners of the city, when the lord
+chancellor informed them of the queen's intention,
+and exhorted them as obedient subjects to accept her
+grace's pleasure and to remain content and quiet. He
+warned them, at the same time, to see that the
+queen's wishes respecting religious services in the city
+were strictly carried out, on pain of incurring her high
+indignation.<a id="noteref_1384" name="noteref_1384" href="#note_1384"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1384</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The city put into a state of defence.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Steps were taken for putting the city into a proper
+state of defence. The civic companies were ordered
+to set watches as on similar critical occasions, and
+no gunpowder, weapons or other munitions of war
+were allowed to be sent out of the city. Chains were
+set up at the bridge-foot and at the corner of New
+Fish Street. The borough of Southwark was called
+upon to provide eighty tall and able men, well
+harnessed and weaponed, for the safeguard of the
+queen's person and of the city,<a id="noteref_1385" name="noteref_1385" href="#note_1385"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1385</span></span></a> whilst the livery
+companies at a few hours' notice furnished a force of
+500 men to be speedily despatched by water to
+Gravesend.<a id="noteref_1386" name="noteref_1386" href="#note_1386"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1386</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The queen's speech at the Guildhall, 1 Feb., 1554.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Whatever faults Queen Mary had, she was by no
+means deficient in courage. On the same day (1 Feb.)
+that Wyatt appeared with his forces at Southwark,<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page463">[pg 463]</span><a name="Pg463" id="Pg463" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc258" id="toc258"></a>
+she came to the Guildhall<a id="noteref_1387" name="noteref_1387" href="#note_1387"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1387</span></span></a> and there addressed a
+spirited harangue to the assembled citizens.<a id="noteref_1388" name="noteref_1388" href="#note_1388"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1388</span></span></a> She
+plainly told them that her proposed marriage was but
+a Spanish cloak to cover the real purpose of the
+rebellion, which was aimed against her religion. She
+was their queen, and they had sworn allegiance to
+her; they surely would not allow her to fall into the
+hands of so vile a traitor as Wyatt was. As for her
+marriage, it had been arranged with the full knowledge
+of the lords of the council, as one of expediency for
+the realm. Passion had no part in the matter. She had
+hitherto, she thanked God, lived a virgin, and doubted
+not she could, if necessary, live so still. At the close
+of her speech, which, we are told, was delivered in
+a loud voice so that all might hear, she bade the
+citizens to pluck up heart and not to fear the rebels
+any more than she did. She then quitted the hall
+and went up into the aldermen's council chamber and
+there refreshed herself, after which she rode through
+Bucklersbury to the Vintry, where she took barge to
+Westminster.</p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">In the meantime the Spanish ambassadors had
+taken fright at Wyatt's approach and had "sped
+themselves awaie by water, and that with all hast."<a id="noteref_1389" name="noteref_1389" href="#note_1389"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1389</span></span></a>
+Many inhabitants of the city had also deserted their
+fellow burgesses at this critical time, and their names
+were submitted to the Court of Aldermen for subsequent
+enquiry.<a id="noteref_1390" name="noteref_1390" href="#note_1390"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1390</span></span></a> They were, according to Foxe,
+afraid of being entrapped by the queen and perhaps
+put to death.</p>
+
+<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page464">[pg 464]</span><a name="Pg464" id="Pg464" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">A force of 1,000 men raised in the city.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">In response to the queen's speech the citizens at
+once set to work to raise a force of 1,000 men for the
+defence of the city, the mayor and aldermen each in
+his own ward taking a muster. So busy was everyone
+on Candlemas-day (2 Feb.) that the civic
+authorities omitted to attend the afternoon service at
+St. Paul's, and the mayor's serving-men waited upon
+him at dinner ready harnessed.<a id="noteref_1391" name="noteref_1391" href="#note_1391"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1391</span></span></a> Even the lawyers
+at Westminster "pleaded in harness."<a id="noteref_1392" name="noteref_1392" href="#note_1392"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1392</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Wyatt and his followers before Ludgate.</span></div></div>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Wyatt made prisoner and lodged in the Tower.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The defensive precautions taken by the mayor
+and aldermen were sufficient to prevent Wyatt making
+good his entry into the city by Southwark and London
+Bridge. Foiled in this direction he sought to approach
+the city from another side, but had to march as far as
+Kingston before he could cross the Thames. Many
+of his followers in the meantime deserted him.<a id="noteref_1393" name="noteref_1393" href="#note_1393"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1393</span></span></a>
+Nevertheless he continued to make his way, with
+but little opposition, to Ludgate, which, contrary to
+his expectation, he found shut in his face. He had
+been recognised by a tailor of Watling Street, who
+seeing the force approaching cried, "I know that theys
+be Wyettes ancienttes," and forthwith closed the
+gate.<a id="noteref_1394" name="noteref_1394" href="#note_1394"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1394</span></span></a> That Wyatt had supporters in the city may be
+gathered from the half-hearted opposition that he met
+with in Southwark, as well as from the fact that many
+of the soldiers raised in the city and neighbourhood
+deserted to Wyatt at the outset of the rebellion.<a id="noteref_1395" name="noteref_1395" href="#note_1395"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1395</span></span></a>
+Wyatt himself exhibited no little disappointment
+at finding Ludgate closed against him instead of the<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page465">[pg 465]</span><a name="Pg465" id="Pg465" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc259" id="toc259"></a>
+aid which he evidently had expected. "I have kept
+touch" said he, as he turned his back on the city.<a id="noteref_1396" name="noteref_1396" href="#note_1396"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1396</span></span></a>
+He had scarcely reached Temple Bar before he was
+overcome by a superior force and yielded himself a
+prisoner. After a short stay at Whitehall he was
+removed to the Tower.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Execution of Lady Jane Grey, Wyatt and others.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The failure of the revolt was fatal to Lady
+Jane Grey, and she was beheaded within the Tower
+(12 Feb.) almost at the same time that her husband
+was being executed outside on Tower Hill. By the
+strange irony of fortune, it fell to the lot of Thomas
+Offley to perform the duties of sheriff at Dudley's
+execution, although he had himself been one of the
+supporters of the Lady Jane in her claim to the crown.
+For the next few days the city presented a sad
+spectacle; whichever way one turned there was to be
+seen a gibbet with its wretched burden, whilst the
+city's gates bristled with human heads.<a id="noteref_1397" name="noteref_1397" href="#note_1397"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1397</span></span></a> Wyatt himself
+was one of the last to suffer, being brought to the
+block on Tower Hill on the 11th April. His head
+and a portion of his body, after being exposed on
+gallows, were taken away by his friends for decent
+burial.<a id="noteref_1398" name="noteref_1398" href="#note_1398"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1398</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Measures for preserving the peace.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">On the 17th February proclamation was made
+for all strangers to leave the realm, on the ground
+that they sowed the seeds of their "malycyouse
+doctryne and lewde conversacioun" among the queen's
+good subjects;<a id="noteref_1399" name="noteref_1399" href="#note_1399"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1399</span></span></a> and this had been followed in the city<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page466">[pg 466]</span><a name="Pg466" id="Pg466" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+by precepts to each alderman to call before him all
+the householders of his ward, both rich and poor, on
+Wednesday the 7th March, at six o'clock in the morning,
+and strictly charge them that they, their wives,
+their children and servants behave themselves in all
+things and more especially in matters of religion,
+following the example of the queen herself. All
+offenders were to be reported forthwith.<a id="noteref_1400" name="noteref_1400" href="#note_1400"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1400</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The lord mayor before the Star Chamber.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">A report having got abroad in the city that the
+lords of the council had endeavoured to extract a
+confession from Wyatt implicating the Princess Elizabeth
+in the late rebellion, the mayor was ordered
+by Bishop Gardiner to bring up the originator of the
+rumour before the Star Chamber. When Sir Thomas
+White appeared with the culprit, one Richard Cut by
+name, a servant to a grocer in the city, he was soundly
+rated by Gardiner for not having himself punished the
+offender, and when he replied that the party was
+there present for the Star Chamber to deal with
+according to its pleasure, was again rebuked:—"My
+lord, take heed to your charge, the Citie of London
+is a whirlepoole and a sinke of evill rumors, there
+they be bred, and from thence spred into all parts
+of the realme."<a id="noteref_1401" name="noteref_1401" href="#note_1401"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1401</span></span></a> Cut paid the penalty for his love
+of gossip by being made to stand two days in the
+pillory and by the loss of his ears.<a id="noteref_1402" name="noteref_1402" href="#note_1402"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1402</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Demand of money from the city, 1554.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The suppression of the revolt left Mary at liberty
+to carry out her matrimonial design. But before
+accomplishing this she was determined to place such
+a garrison in or near London as should prevent similar<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page467">[pg 467]</span><a name="Pg467" id="Pg467" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc260" id="toc260"></a>
+outbreaks in future. For this purpose she applied to
+the citizens for a sum of 6,000 marks. Thus called
+upon to supply a rod for their own backs, the citizens
+demurred. They at first proposed to offer the sum of
+1,000 marks, or at the most £1,000; they afterwards
+agreed to contribute double the first mentioned sum,<a id="noteref_1403" name="noteref_1403" href="#note_1403"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1403</span></span></a>
+and this was accepted. The money was raised by
+contributions from the different livery companies, the
+Merchant Taylors, the Mercers, the Grocers, the
+Drapers, the Fishmongers, the Goldsmiths, and the
+Haberdashers being called upon to subscribe the sum
+of £100 respectively, whilst the rest of the companies
+paid sums varying from £80 to forty shillings.<a id="noteref_1404" name="noteref_1404" href="#note_1404"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1404</span></span></a> No
+sooner had the citizens satisfied the queen in this
+respect than they were called upon to send 200
+soldiers to Gillingham, in Kent, there to be embarked
+for foreign service under the Lord Admiral. The City
+again demurred, and asked to be excused the necessity
+of forwarding the men beyond Billingsgate or the
+Tower Wharf and also of providing them with
+accoutrements. It was to no purpose, both men and
+accoutrements had to be found.<a id="noteref_1405" name="noteref_1405" href="#note_1405"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1405</span></span></a> On the 10th April
+the chamberlain received orders to see that the city's
+artillery was in readiness and to increase the store of
+gunpowder.<a id="noteref_1406" name="noteref_1406" href="#note_1406"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1406</span></span></a> Wyatt was to be executed the next
+day, and these orders were probably given in anticipation
+of a disturbance.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Trial at the Guildhall of Nicholas Throckmorton, 17 April.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">That Wyatt still had friends in the city is shown
+by the bold attitude taken up by the jury in the
+trial (17 April) of one of his accomplices, Nicholas
+Throckmorton, against whom they brought in a<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page468">[pg 468]</span><a name="Pg468" id="Pg468" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+verdict of not guilty.<a id="noteref_1407" name="noteref_1407" href="#note_1407"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1407</span></span></a> For this they were bound
+over to appear before the Star Chamber. Four of the
+twelve made submission; the rest, among whom were
+Thomas Whetstone, a haberdasher, and Emanuel
+Lucar, a merchant tailor, were committed some to
+the Tower and the rest to the Fleet, where they
+remained for six months. In the meantime the
+Court of Aldermen wrote (19 July) to the council in
+their favour, but with little success.<a id="noteref_1408" name="noteref_1408" href="#note_1408"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1408</span></span></a> A month later
+(19 August) a deputation waited on the Court of
+Aldermen for advice as to what future steps had
+best be taken for obtaining the release of their
+brethren in the Fleet, when they were told that the
+wives of the prisoners or the prisoners' friends should
+first make suit to the council for their release, after
+which the court would see what they could do.<a id="noteref_1409" name="noteref_1409" href="#note_1409"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1409</span></span></a> At
+length the prisoners were summoned once more
+(26 Oct.) before the Star Chamber, when they one
+and all declared that they had only acted in accordance
+with their conscience, whilst Lucar, more outspoken
+than the rest, asserted that "they had done in the
+matter like honest men and true and faithful subjects."
+Such plain speaking ill suited the judges, who thereupon
+condemned the offenders to a fine of 1,000
+marks apiece and imprisonment until further order.
+Eventually five out of the eight were discharged
+(12 December) on payment of a fine of £220, and ten
+days later the rest regained their liberty on payment
+of £60 apiece.<a id="noteref_1410" name="noteref_1410" href="#note_1410"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1410</span></span></a></p>
+
+<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page469">[pg 469]</span><a name="Pg469" id="Pg469" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc261" id="toc261"></a>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The queen's marriage, July, 1554.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">A parliament which met in April (1554)<a id="noteref_1411" name="noteref_1411" href="#note_1411"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1411</span></span></a> gave its
+consent to Mary's marriage with Philip, but refused
+to re-enact the old statutes for the persecution of
+heretics. On the 19th July Philip landed at Southampton,
+and on the 21st Mary herself notified
+the event to the citizens of London,<a id="noteref_1412" name="noteref_1412" href="#note_1412"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1412</span></span></a> who for
+some time past had been making preparations for
+giving both queen and king a fitting reception, and
+who immediately on receipt of the news of Philip's
+landing caused bonfires to be lighted in the streets.<a id="noteref_1413" name="noteref_1413" href="#note_1413"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1413</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The passage of the king and queen through the city, 19 Aug.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Mary rode down to Winchester to meet Philip,<a id="noteref_1414" name="noteref_1414" href="#note_1414"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1414</span></span></a>
+and on the 25th became his wife. It was not until
+the 17th August that the royal pair approached
+the city. On that day they came by water from Richmond
+to Southwark, the king in one barge, the queen
+in another. After taking refreshment at the Bishop
+of Winchester's palace, and killing a buck or two in
+the bishop's park, they retired to rest.<a id="noteref_1415" name="noteref_1415" href="#note_1415"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1415</span></span></a> Special
+orders were given to the aldermen to keep a good
+and substantial double watch in the city from nine
+o'clock in the evening (17 Aug.) until five o'clock the
+next morning, such watch to continue until further
+notice.<a id="noteref_1416" name="noteref_1416" href="#note_1416"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1416</span></span></a> The authorities differ widely as to the
+precise day on which the royal party passed through
+the city. The city's own records point to the afternoon
+of Sunday the 19th August as the day. On the
+morning of that day the Court of Aldermen sat, and<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page470">[pg 470]</span><a name="Pg470" id="Pg470" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+a letter from the queen commending them for their
+forwardness in "making shewes of honour and gladnes"
+for the occasion was read to the wardens of all
+the companies for them to communicate to the
+members. The wardens were further enjoined to
+give strict orders to the members of their several
+companies to honestly use and entreat the Spaniards
+in all things, both at their coming in with the king
+and queen and ever afterwards. The same morning
+a speech which the Recorder had prepared for the
+occasion in English was handed over to the master of
+St. Paul's School to be turned into Latin. None too
+much time was allowed the worthy pedagogue for
+the purpose, for he was to give it back that same
+afternoon so that the Recorder might "make and
+pronounce yt to the kinges majesty at his comynge
+in."<a id="noteref_1417" name="noteref_1417" href="#note_1417"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1417</span></span></a></p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">A curious incident is related in connection with
+the royal procession through the city. The conduit
+in Gracious Church Street, which had been newly
+painted and gilded, bore representations of the "nine
+worthies," and among them Henry the Eighth and
+Edward the Sixth. Instead of carrying a sword or
+mace like the rest, Henry had been portrayed with a
+sceptre in one hand and a book bearing the inscription
+<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Verbum Dei</span></span> in the other. This catching the eye of
+Bishop Gardiner as he passed in the royal train, he
+was very wroth and sent for the painter, asked him
+by whose orders he had so depicted the king, called
+him "traitor" and threatened him with the Fleet<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page471">[pg 471]</span><a name="Pg471" id="Pg471" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc262" id="toc262"></a>
+prison. The poor painter, who for the first time had
+been made to realise the change that was taking
+place, pleaded that what he had done had been done
+in all innocence, and hastened to rectify his mistake
+by removing the bible from the picture and substituting
+in its place a pair of gloves.<a id="noteref_1418" name="noteref_1418" href="#note_1418"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1418</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The reconciliation with Rome, 1554.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">In November (1554) a new parliament<a id="noteref_1419" name="noteref_1419" href="#note_1419"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1419</span></span></a> was
+called, which proved more ready than the last to
+comply with the queen's wishes. It re-enacted the
+statutes for burning heretics and agreed to a reconciliation
+of the Church of England with the See
+of Rome, but it refused to sanction the surrender
+of Church lands. Bonner had already taken steps
+to purge his diocese of heresy by issuing a series
+of articles (14 Sept.) to which every inhabitant,
+clerical and lay, was expected to conform.<a id="noteref_1420" name="noteref_1420" href="#note_1420"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1420</span></span></a> That
+there was room for improvement in matters touching
+religion and public decorum there is no doubt, otherwise
+there would have been no need of proclamations
+such as those against the arrest of persons whilst
+conducting service in church,<a id="noteref_1421" name="noteref_1421" href="#note_1421"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1421</span></span></a> against wrangling over
+passages of scripture in common taverns and victualling
+houses,<a id="noteref_1422" name="noteref_1422" href="#note_1422"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1422</span></span></a> or against carrying of baskets of
+provisions and leading mules, horses or other beasts
+through St. Paul's.<a id="noteref_1423" name="noteref_1423" href="#note_1423"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1423</span></span></a></p>
+
+<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page472">[pg 472]</span><a name="Pg472" id="Pg472" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The mayor and aldermen endeavoured to set a
+good example by constant attendance at the services
+and by joining in processions at St. Paul's as in former
+days.<a id="noteref_1424" name="noteref_1424" href="#note_1424"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1424</span></span></a> The law forbidding the eating of meat in
+Lent, except by special licence, was vigorously enforced.<a id="noteref_1425" name="noteref_1425" href="#note_1425"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1425</span></span></a>
+Ale-houses and taverns were closed on
+Sundays and holy days, and interludes were forbidden.<a id="noteref_1426" name="noteref_1426" href="#note_1426"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1426</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Opposition to the reestablishment of the old religion.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Nevertheless the attempt to restore the old
+worship within the city was often met with scornful
+mockery, sometimes attended with violence. A dead
+cat, for instance, was one day found hanging in
+Cheapside, its head shorn in imitation of a priest's
+tonsure, and its body clothed in a mock ecclesiastical
+vestment, with cross before and behind, whilst a piece
+of white paper to represent a singing-cake was placed
+between its forefeet, which had been tied together.
+Bonner was very angry at this travesty of religion,
+and caused the effigy to be publicly displayed at
+Paul's Cross during sermon time. A reward of twenty
+marks was offered for the discovery of this atrocious
+act, but with what success we do not know.<a id="noteref_1427" name="noteref_1427" href="#note_1427"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1427</span></span></a></p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">On another occasion, when the Holy Sacrament
+was being carried in solemn procession through
+Smithfield on Corpus Christi-day (24 May), an attempt
+was made to knock the holy elements out of the
+hands of the priest. The offender was taken to<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page473">[pg 473]</span><a name="Pg473" id="Pg473" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc263" id="toc263"></a>
+Newgate, where he feigned to be mad.<a id="noteref_1428" name="noteref_1428" href="#note_1428"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1428</span></span></a> Again, on the
+following Easter-day a priest was fiercely attacked
+by a man with a wood-knife whilst administering the
+sacrament in the church of St. Margaret, Westminster.
+The culprit was seized, and after trial and conviction
+paid the penalty of his crime by being burned at the
+stake.<a id="noteref_1429" name="noteref_1429" href="#note_1429"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1429</span></span></a> A pudding was once offered to a priest whilst
+walking in a religious procession,<a id="noteref_1430" name="noteref_1430" href="#note_1430"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1430</span></span></a> the offender being
+afterwards whipt at the "Post of Reformation," which
+had been set up in Cheapside in 1553.<a id="noteref_1431" name="noteref_1431" href="#note_1431"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1431</span></span></a> But all this
+defiance shown to Mary's attempt to restore the old
+worship only led her to exercise more drastic methods
+for accomplishing her purpose.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The Marian persecution, 1555.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">By the opening of 1555 her own strong personal
+will had overcome the conciliatory policy of her
+husband, who was content to restrain his fanaticism
+within the limits of expediency, and the Marian
+persecution commenced. On the 25th January a
+proclamation was issued in the name of the king and
+queen, and bearing the signature of William Blackwell,
+the town clerk of the city, enjoining the lighting of
+bonfires that afternoon in various places in token of
+great joy and gladness for the abolition of sundry
+great sins, errors and heresies which lately had arisen
+within the realm of England, and for the quiet renovation
+and restitution of the true Catholic faith of Christ
+and his holy religion.<a id="noteref_1432" name="noteref_1432" href="#note_1432"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1432</span></span></a> This proclamation was but a
+prelude to other fires lighted for a very different
+purpose, which the mind even at this day cannot
+contemplate without a shudder. The first victim of
+the flames for conscience sake was John Rogers, once<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page474">[pg 474]</span><a name="Pg474" id="Pg474" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+vicar of St. Sepulchre's church and prebendary of St.
+Paul's. He was burnt in Smithfield "for gret herysy"
+in February of this year, in which month Hooper,
+who had been deprived of his bishopric of Gloucester,
+suffered the same fate in his own cathedral city.<a id="noteref_1433" name="noteref_1433" href="#note_1433"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1433</span></span></a>
+In the following May another city vicar, John Cardmaker,
+otherwise known as John Taylor of St. Bride's,
+who had been a reader at St. Paul's and had publicly
+lectured against the real presence, was burnt in Smithfield
+with John Warne, an "upholder" of Walbrook.<a id="noteref_1434" name="noteref_1434" href="#note_1434"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1434</span></span></a></p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Few weeks passed without the fire claiming some
+human victim either in London or the provinces.
+On the 9th February Thomas Tomkins, a godly and
+charitable weaver of Shoreditch, and William Hunter,
+a young London apprentice, were with four others
+condemned to the stake. The two named met their
+fate in Smithfield, one on the 16th March and the
+other on the 26th. The rest were removed into
+Essex and there consigned to the flames, three of
+them in March and one in the following June.<a id="noteref_1435" name="noteref_1435" href="#note_1435"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1435</span></span></a></p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">In October Bishops Latimer and Ridley were
+burnt at Oxford. "Be of good comfort, Master
+Ridley, and play the man"—cried Latimer encouragingly
+to his fellow sufferer—"we shall this day light
+such a candle, by God's grace, in England as I trust
+shall never be put out." In March of the following
+year (1556) Cranmer, after some display of weakness,
+suffered the same fate, on the same spot, and with no
+less fortitude. And thus for two years more the fires
+were kept alive in London and in the country; the<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page475">[pg 475]</span><a name="Pg475" id="Pg475" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc264" id="toc264"></a>
+Lollard's tower at St. Paul's serving as a prison for
+heretics,<a id="noteref_1436" name="noteref_1436" href="#note_1436"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1436</span></span></a> and proving more often than not but a step
+to Smithfield.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Renewed opposition to strangers in the city.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Throughout Mary's reign the strife between the
+citizens and merchant strangers was renewed. She
+had herself added to the evil by her marriage with
+Philip, causing the city to be flooded with Spaniards,
+who took up their abode in the halls of the civic
+companies.<a id="noteref_1437" name="noteref_1437" href="#note_1437"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1437</span></span></a> A rumour got abroad early in September,
+1554, that 12,000 Spaniards were coming over "to
+fethe the crown,"<a id="noteref_1438" name="noteref_1438" href="#note_1438"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1438</span></span></a> and this accounts for precepts
+being sent to the several aldermen of the city on
+the 27th September enjoining them to make a return
+of the number of foreigners that had come to reside
+in their ward during the past nine or ten days, and
+whence they came.<a id="noteref_1439" name="noteref_1439" href="#note_1439"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1439</span></span></a> The favour shown by the Crown
+to the merchants of the Steelyard was especially
+annoying to the freemen of the city.<a id="noteref_1440" name="noteref_1440" href="#note_1440"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1440</span></span></a> It was to little
+purpose that the mayor and aldermen issued orders
+from time to time against giving work to foreigners
+and prohibiting all such from opening shops within<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page476">[pg 476]</span><a name="Pg476" id="Pg476" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+the city.<a id="noteref_1441" name="noteref_1441" href="#note_1441"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1441</span></span></a> The struggle between citizen and stranger
+still went on. In 1557 the corporation made an
+effort to induce the king and queen to revoke the
+favours shown to the merchants of the Steelyard in
+prejudice of the liberties of the city,<a id="noteref_1442" name="noteref_1442" href="#note_1442"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1442</span></span></a> and eventually
+the privileges were revoked on the ground that the
+merchants of the Hanse had not kept faith with the
+Crown.<a id="noteref_1443" name="noteref_1443" href="#note_1443"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1443</span></span></a> In the same year the exclusiveness entertained
+by the citizens towards foreigners made
+itself felt more particularly against that class of
+foreigner which kept open school in the city for
+teaching writing. Certain scriveners, freemen of the
+city, made a complaint before the Court of Aldermen
+against foreigners keeping writing-school within the
+city and its liberties.<a id="noteref_1444" name="noteref_1444" href="#note_1444"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1444</span></span></a> The chamberlain's conduct of
+shutting in the shop windows of foreigners teaching
+children to write was approved by the mayor and
+aldermen,<a id="noteref_1445" name="noteref_1445" href="#note_1445"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1445</span></span></a> whilst freemen were allowed to keep open
+school provided they entered into a bond not to engross
+deeds.<a id="noteref_1446" name="noteref_1446" href="#note_1446"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1446</span></span></a> Occasionally foreigners were successful in
+obtaining licences from the civic authorities for teaching
+writing, but it was only on condition they kept
+their lower windows closed.<a id="noteref_1447" name="noteref_1447" href="#note_1447"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1447</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Philip leaves England, 4 Sept., 1555.</span></div></div>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The queen obtains a City loan of £6,000, Aug., 1556.</span></div></div>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">War declared against France, 7 June, 1557.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">In the meantime the disposition of the queen
+towards heretics became more relentless in proportion
+as her temper became more soured from ill-health, by
+disappointment in not having off-spring, and by the
+increasing neglect of her by her husband. Tired of<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page477">[pg 477]</span><a name="Pg477" id="Pg477" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc265" id="toc265"></a>
+her importunate love and jealousy, Philip took the
+first opportunity of quitting her side and crossed over
+to the continent (4 Sept., 1555) on a visit to the
+Emperor Charles. The abdication of the latter towards
+the close of 1556 made Philip master of the
+richest and most extensive dominions in Europe, and
+his greatest wish at the time was to engage England
+in the war which was kindled between Spain and
+France. In this he received the support of Mary,
+who had in August (1556) succeeded in obtaining a
+loan from the city of £6,000.<a id="noteref_1448" name="noteref_1448" href="#note_1448"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1448</span></span></a> The seizure of the
+castle of Scarborough by Thomas Stafford,<a id="noteref_1449" name="noteref_1449" href="#note_1449"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1449</span></span></a> second
+son of Lord Stafford, in which he was reported to
+have received encouragement from the King of France,
+was made a <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">casus belli</span></span>, and Henry was proclaimed an
+open enemy (7 June, 1557).<a id="noteref_1450" name="noteref_1450" href="#note_1450"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1450</span></span></a> French subjects were
+allowed forty days to quit the country, and letters of
+marque were issued by proclamation on the 9th June.<a id="noteref_1451" name="noteref_1451" href="#note_1451"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1451</span></span></a>
+On the 5th July Philip once more left England for
+Flanders,<a id="noteref_1452" name="noteref_1452" href="#note_1452"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1452</span></span></a> having succeeded in the object for which
+he had come, viz., the declaration of war against
+France.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">A City contingent joins the expedition to France.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The citizens of London at once began to take
+stock of their munitions of war. On the 22nd
+June the Chamberlain was instructed to prepare with
+all convenient speed four dozen good <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">splentes</span></span> and<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page478">[pg 478]</span><a name="Pg478" id="Pg478" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+as many good <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">sallettes</span></span> or <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">sculles</span></span> for the city's
+use, and to cause a bowyer to "peruse" the city's
+bows and to put them in such good order that
+they might be serviceable when required.<a id="noteref_1453" name="noteref_1453" href="#note_1453"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1453</span></span></a> In
+the following month a large force crossed over
+to France under the leadership of Lords Pembroke,
+Montagu and Clinton. To this force the City of
+London contributed a contingent of 500 men, the best
+(according to Machyn<a id="noteref_1454" name="noteref_1454" href="#note_1454"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1454</span></span></a>) that had ever been sent.
+They mustered at the Leadenhall on the 16th July in
+the presence of Sir Thomas Offley,<a id="noteref_1455" name="noteref_1455" href="#note_1455"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1455</span></span></a> the mayor, the
+sheriffs and Sir Richard Lee, and were conveyed
+thence by water to Gravesend and Rochester under
+the charge of ten officers, whose names are duly
+recorded.<a id="noteref_1456" name="noteref_1456" href="#note_1456"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1456</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The City called upon to furnish another contingent of 1,000 men, 31 July.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">On the last day of July the queen informed the
+civic authorities by letter of the departure of her
+"deerest lord and husband" to pursue the enemy in
+France, and desired them to get in readiness 1,000
+men, a portion of whom were to be horsemen, well
+horsed and armed, and the rest to be archers, pikes
+and billmen. The force was to be ready by the<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page479">[pg 479]</span><a name="Pg479" id="Pg479" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc266" id="toc266"></a>
+16th August at the latest, after which date it was to
+be prepared to set out at a day's notice. The letter
+contained a schedule of names of individuals to whom
+the queen had made special application, and these
+were not to be called upon by the municipal officers
+to make any contribution, neither were the tenants
+of those noblemen and gentlemen already on active
+service in France.<a id="noteref_1457" name="noteref_1457" href="#note_1457"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1457</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The citizens make demur, but in vain.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The Court of Aldermen was taken aback at such
+a demand coming so soon after the setting out of the
+previous force, and on the 4th August it instructed the
+Recorder and one of the sheriffs to repair to the
+queen's council "for the good and suer understandyng
+of her majesty's pleasure" in the matter. The deputation
+was further instructed to remind the lords of the
+council not only of the ancient liberties and franchises
+of the city on the point, but also of the city's lack of
+power to furnish a number of men exceeding any it
+had ever been called upon to furnish before.<a id="noteref_1458" name="noteref_1458" href="#note_1458"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1458</span></span></a> It was
+all to no purpose; the men had to be provided; and
+the matter having been fully explained to the wardens
+of the several livery companies, they succeeded in
+raising the force required.<a id="noteref_1459" name="noteref_1459" href="#note_1459"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1459</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The French king defeated at St. Quentin, 27 Aug., 1557.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The defeat of the French king at St. Quentin
+was celebrated in the city by a solemn procession
+to St. Paul's, in which figured the mayor and aldermen
+in their scarlet gowns.<a id="noteref_1460" name="noteref_1460" href="#note_1460"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1460</span></span></a> The joy of the citizens
+was shortlived. Philip's caution did not allow him
+to avail himself of the opportunity thus offered
+him of marching on the French capital, and before<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page480">[pg 480]</span><a name="Pg480" id="Pg480" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+the end of the year matters had taken a different
+turn.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The loss of Calais, 7 Jan., 1558.</span></div></div>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">A city force despatched, 24 Jan., 1558.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">In December a Spaniard named Ferdinando
+Lygons was commissioned to raise 300 mounted
+archers in the city of London and county of Middlesex.<a id="noteref_1461" name="noteref_1461" href="#note_1461"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1461</span></span></a>
+At the opening of the new year (2 Jan., 1558)
+the queen wrote to the corporation desiring to be at
+once furnished with 500 men out of the 1,000 men
+the city had been ordered to keep in readiness since
+July. As the matter was urgent they were not to
+wait to supply the men with coats.<a id="noteref_1462" name="noteref_1462" href="#note_1462"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1462</span></span></a> The force was
+required for the defence of Calais, which was now in
+a critical position. On the 9th January another
+letter was sent by Mary marked, <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Hast, Hast Post,
+Hast, For lief, For lief, For lief, For lief!</span></span> demanding
+the full contingent of 1,000 men.<a id="noteref_1463" name="noteref_1463" href="#note_1463"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1463</span></span></a> Calais had fallen
+two days before,<a id="noteref_1464" name="noteref_1464" href="#note_1464"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1464</span></span></a> and Mary was determined not to
+rest until the town had been recovered. Diligent
+search was at once instituted throughout the city
+for all persons, strangers as well as freemen, capable
+of wearing harness;<a id="noteref_1465" name="noteref_1465" href="#note_1465"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1465</span></span></a> and the livery companies and
+fellowships were called upon to provide double the
+number of men they had furnished in July last.<a id="noteref_1466" name="noteref_1466" href="#note_1466"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1466</span></span></a><span class="tei tei-pb" id="page481">[pg 481]</span><a name="Pg481" id="Pg481" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc267" id="toc267"></a>
+On the 13th the queen wrote to say that a violent
+storm, which had occurred on the night of the 10th
+January, had so crippled the fleet that her forces
+could not be conveyed across the channel; the
+civic authorities were therefore to withhold sending
+their force to the sea-coast until further orders, but
+to keep the same in readiness to start at an hour's
+notice.<a id="noteref_1467" name="noteref_1467" href="#note_1467"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1467</span></span></a> On the 19th January the citizens were
+informed by letter that Philip's forces were on their
+way to Flanders, under the Duke of Savoy, and that
+the channel was being kept open by a fleet under
+Don Luis Carvaial. One half of the force of 1,000
+men, furnished with armour and weapons and coats of
+white welted with green and red crosses, was to be
+despatched to Dover by the end of the month, thence
+to sail for Dunkirk for service under the Earl of
+Rutland. The City was to take especial care that
+the contingent should be chosen from the handsomest
+and best picked men, and superior to those
+last sent.<a id="noteref_1468" name="noteref_1468" href="#note_1468"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1468</span></span></a> The force mustered at the Leadenhall, the
+24th January, for inspection by the mayor, and at
+five o'clock in the evening were delivered over to
+the captains for shipment.<a id="noteref_1469" name="noteref_1469" href="#note_1469"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1469</span></span></a> Three days later the
+lords of the council instructed the mayor to make
+a return of the number of foreigners residing still
+within the city, and to make proclamation on the
+next market day that it should be lawful thenceforth
+for anyone to seize the persons of Frenchmen who
+had not avoided the city pursuant to a previous order,<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page482">[pg 482]</span><a name="Pg482" id="Pg482" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+and to confiscate their goods and chattels to his own
+proper use.<a id="noteref_1470" name="noteref_1470" href="#note_1470"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1470</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">A city loan of £20,000, March, 1558.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Mary succeeded in March in raising a loan in the
+city of £20,000 (she had asked for 100,000 marks or
+£75,000<a id="noteref_1471" name="noteref_1471" href="#note_1471"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1471</span></span></a>) on the security of the crown lands. The
+loan bore interest at the rate of twelve per cent., and
+a special dispensation was granted to avoid the
+penalties of the Usury Act.<a id="noteref_1472" name="noteref_1472" href="#note_1472"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1472</span></span></a> The money was raised
+by assessment on the livery companies. On the
+16th March the Court of Aldermen summoned
+the wardens of the twelve principal companies
+to attend at the Guildhall at eight o'clock the
+next morning, in order that they might learn how
+much the lords of the council had "<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-weight: 700">tottyd</span></span>" against
+each of them towards the loan. The smaller companies
+were to attend in the afternoon of the same
+day in order to be informed of the sums the Court of
+Aldermen deemed fit that each should contribute to
+assist their wealthier brethren. The total amount subscribed
+by the greater companies was £16,983 <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">6s.</span></span> 8<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">d.</span></span>,
+of which the Mercers contributed £3,275. The lesser
+companies subscribed £1,310, in sums varying from
+£30 to £500.<a id="noteref_1473" name="noteref_1473" href="#note_1473"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1473</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Death of Mary, 17 Nov., 1558.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">It is probable that Mary wanted this loan to
+enable her to prosecute the war. The country was<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page483">[pg 483]</span><a name="Pg483" id="Pg483" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc268" id="toc268"></a>
+not disposed, however, to assist her in this direction.
+The people were afraid of rendering Philip too powerful.
+Disappointed both in her public and domestic
+life, she fell a victim to dropsy and died on the
+17th November—"wondering why all that she had
+done, as she believed on God's behalf, had been
+followed by failure on every side—by the desertion
+of her husband, and the hatred of her subjects."
+The loss of Calais so much affected her that she
+declared that the name of the town would be found
+impressed upon her heart after death. On the
+occasion of her funeral the City put in its customary
+claim for black livery cloth, but more than one
+application had to be made before the cloth was
+forthcoming.<a id="noteref_1474" name="noteref_1474" href="#note_1474"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1474</span></span></a></p>
+</div>
+</div>
+
+<hr class="doublepage" /><div class="tei tei-div" style="margin-bottom: 5.00em; margin-top: 5.00em">
+<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page484">[pg 484]</span><a name="Pg484" id="Pg484" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+<a name="toc269" id="toc269"></a>
+<a name="pdf270" id="pdf270"></a>
+<h1 class="tei tei-head" style="text-align: left; margin-bottom: 3.46em; margin-top: 3.46em"><span style="font-size: 173%">CHAPTER XVII.</span></h1>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-div" style="margin-bottom: 4.00em; margin-top: 4.00em">
+<h2 class="tei tei-head" style="text-align: left; margin-bottom: 2.88em; margin-top: 2.88em"></h2>
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The ascension of Elizabeth, 17 Nov., 1558.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The accession of Elizabeth, after the gloomy
+reign of her sister, was welcomed by none more joyfully
+than by the citizens of London, who continued
+to commemorate the day with bonfires and general
+rejoicing long after the queen had been laid in her
+grave.<a id="noteref_1475" name="noteref_1475" href="#note_1475"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1475</span></span></a> When news was brought of her sister's death
+Elizabeth was at Hatfield. Within a week she
+removed to London and took up her abode at the
+Charterhouse. The sheriffs went out to meet her
+as far as the boundary of the county of Middlesex,
+the limit of their jurisdiction, dressed in coats of velvet,
+with their chains about their necks and white rods in
+their hands. Having first kissed their rods, they
+handed them to the queen, who immediately returned
+them, and the sheriffs thereupon joined the gentlemen
+of the cavalcade and rode before her majesty
+until they met Sir Thomas Leigh,<a id="noteref_1476" name="noteref_1476" href="#note_1476"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1476</span></span></a> the mayor, and
+his brethren the aldermen. The sheriffs then fell
+back and took their places among the aldermen.<a id="noteref_1477" name="noteref_1477" href="#note_1477"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1477</span></span></a><span class="tei tei-pb" id="page485">[pg 485]</span><a name="Pg485" id="Pg485" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc271" id="toc271"></a>
+From the Charterhouse she removed after a stay
+of a few days to the Tower, amid the blare of
+trumpets, the singing of children and the firing of
+ordnance.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The queen's coronation, 15 Jan., 1559.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The Court of Common Council (21 Nov.) agreed
+to levy two fifteenths on the inhabitants of the city
+for the customary present to be given the new queen
+on her passing through the city to her coronation,
+which was to take place on the 15th January following,
+as well as for defraying the costs of pageants on
+the occasion.<a id="noteref_1478" name="noteref_1478" href="#note_1478"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1478</span></span></a> Committees were appointed to see
+that the several conduits, the Standard and Cross in
+Cheap, and other parts of the city were seemly
+trimmed and decked with pageants, fine paintings
+and rich cloth of Arras, silver and gold, as at the
+coronation of Queen Mary, and better still if it conveniently
+could be done.<a id="noteref_1479" name="noteref_1479" href="#note_1479"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1479</span></span></a> Among those appointed to
+devise pageants for the occasion and to act as masters
+of the ceremony was Richard Grafton, the printer.<a id="noteref_1480" name="noteref_1480" href="#note_1480"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1480</span></span></a>
+Eight commoners were appointed by the Court of
+Aldermen (17 Dec.) to attend upon the chief butler of
+England at the cupboard at the coronation banquet.<a id="noteref_1481" name="noteref_1481" href="#note_1481"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1481</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">A strike among the painters.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">A curious instance of a strike among painters is
+recorded at this time. The painters of the city, we
+are told, utterly refused to fresh paint and trim the
+great conduit in Cheap for the coronation for the sum
+of twenty marks. This being the case, the surveyors
+of the city were instructed to cause the same to be
+covered with cloth of Arras having escutcheons of the
+queen's Arms finely made and set therein, and the
+wardens of the Painters' Company were called upon<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page486">[pg 486]</span><a name="Pg486" id="Pg486" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+to render assistance with advice and men for reasonable
+remuneration.<a id="noteref_1482" name="noteref_1482" href="#note_1482"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1482</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Elizabeth's policy of moderation, 1558.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The main object which Elizabeth kept before her
+eyes, from first to last, was the preservation of peace—peace
+within the Church and without. Her natural
+inclination was towards the more ornate ritual of the
+Roman Church, but the necessity she was under of
+gaining the support of the Protestants, whom even the
+fires of Smithfield had failed to suppress, inspired
+restraint. All her actions were marked with caution
+and deliberation. From the day of her accession
+religious persecution in its worst form ceased. Non-conformity
+was no longer punished by death. Preachers
+who took advantage of the lull which followed the
+Marian persecution and resumed disputatious sermons,
+as they did more especially in the city, were silenced
+by royal proclamation,<a id="noteref_1483" name="noteref_1483" href="#note_1483"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1483</span></span></a> which ordered them to confine
+themselves to reading the gospel and epistle for the
+day, and the Ten Commandments, in the vulgar tongue,
+without adding any comment. They were further
+ordered to make use of no public prayer, rite or
+ceremony other than that already accepted until parliament
+should ordain otherwise.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The Act of Uniformity and Supremacy, 1558.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Parliament met in January, 1559, and at once
+acknowledged the queen's legitimacy and her title to
+the crown, an acknowledgment which she had failed
+to obtain from the Pope. An Act of Uniformity was
+passed forbidding the use of any form of public prayer
+other than that set out in the last Prayer Book of
+Edward VI, amended in those particulars which
+savoured of ultra-Protestantism. The same parliament<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page487">[pg 487]</span><a name="Pg487" id="Pg487" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc272" id="toc272"></a>
+also passed an Act of Supremacy, which dropt the
+title of supreme head of the Church with reference
+to the queen, but still upheld the ancient jurisdiction
+of the Crown over all ecclesiastics. Having accomplished
+this much, parliament was dissolved (8 May).</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The restoration of the Prayer Book and abolition of the Mass, 1559.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">On the following Whitsunday (14 May) Divine
+Service was conducted in the city in English according
+to the Book of Common Prayer.<a id="noteref_1484" name="noteref_1484" href="#note_1484"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1484</span></span></a> Commissioners
+were appointed in July "to ride about the realm for
+the establishing of true religion," four being nominated
+for the city, whose duty it was to call before them
+divers persons of every parish and make them swear
+to observe "certain injunctions newly set out in
+print."<a id="noteref_1485" name="noteref_1485" href="#note_1485"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1485</span></span></a> The election of a new mayor at Michaelmas
+was followed by the celebration of a "communion"
+in the Guildhall Chapel."<a id="noteref_1486" name="noteref_1486" href="#note_1486"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1486</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Ultra-Protestant reformers in the city, 1559.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The success of Elizabeth's policy was unfortunately
+marred by the excess of zeal displayed by
+the reformers. More especially was this the case in
+the city of London. Had the inhabitants bent their
+energy towards putting down the disgraceful trafficking
+that went on within the very walls of their
+cathedral church, shutting up gambling houses, and
+stopping interludes and plays which made a jest of
+religion, instead of leaving such abuses to be corrected
+by royal proclamation,<a id="noteref_1487" name="noteref_1487" href="#note_1487"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1487</span></span></a> their conduct would have
+met with universal approbation. Instead of this they
+again set to work pulling down roods, smashing up
+ancient tombs and committing to the flames vestments<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page488">[pg 488]</span><a name="Pg488" id="Pg488" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+and service books—the work of years of artistic
+labour<a id="noteref_1488" name="noteref_1488" href="#note_1488"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1488</span></span></a>—until the wanton destruction was restricted,
+if not altogether stopped, by the queen's orders.<a id="noteref_1489" name="noteref_1489" href="#note_1489"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1489</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The claims of Mary Stuart, 1559-1560.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">In the meantime the state of affairs with France
+and Scotland demanded Elizabeth's attention. The
+marriage of Mary Stuart with the Dauphin of France
+had taken place in April, 1558, and the sudden death
+of Henry II of France by an accident at a tournament
+had soon afterwards raised her and her husband to
+the throne. Mary now assumed the arms and style of
+Queen of England, and the life-long quarrel between
+her and Elizabeth was about to commence. By the
+end of the year (1559) Mary had collected a sufficient
+force at her back to render her mistress of Scotland.
+In the following January a French fleet was ready
+to set sail. Nevertheless Elizabeth refused to take
+any active measures to meet the enemy and to prevent
+them effecting a landing. On the 6th she caused
+proclamation to be made for French subjects to be
+allowed perfect freedom as in time of peace, but
+English vessels were to be held in readiness "untill yt
+maye appeare to what ende the greate preparaciouns
+of Fraunce do entende."<a id="noteref_1490" name="noteref_1490" href="#note_1490"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1490</span></span></a> Long after the appearance
+of a French fleet off the coast of Scotland, and
+when it had been driven to take refuge in Leith
+harbour, Elizabeth still declared her intention of<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page489">[pg 489]</span><a name="Pg489" id="Pg489" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc273" id="toc273"></a>
+keeping, if possible, on friendly terms with France if
+only the "insolent titles and claims" of Francis and
+Mary might cease and Scotland left in peace.<a id="noteref_1491" name="noteref_1491" href="#note_1491"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1491</span></span></a> With
+the aid of soldiers and seamen provided by the City<a id="noteref_1492" name="noteref_1492" href="#note_1492"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1492</span></span></a>
+the French were forced to surrender, and, by a treaty
+signed at Edinburgh, agreed to leave Scotland and to
+acknowledge Elizabeth's right to the English crown.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The French war, 1562-1564.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">In 1561 Mary, who had declined to recognise the
+treaty of Edinburgh from the first, returned to Scotland,
+in spite of Elizabeth's prohibition, and soon succeeded
+in drawing over many Protestants to her side. In the
+following year an opportunity offered itself to Elizabeth
+for striking a blow at her rival—not in Scotland,
+but in France. A civil war had broken out between
+the French Protestants—or Huguenots, as they were
+called—and their Catholic fellow-subjects, and Elizabeth
+promised (Sept., 1562) to assist the leaders of
+the Huguenots on condition that Havre—or Newhaven,
+as the place was then known—was surrendered
+to her as security for the fulfilment of a promise to
+surrender Calais. The queen (23 July, 1562) applied
+by letter to the City of London for a force of 600 men
+to be held in readiness to march at a moment's notice.
+She had determined, the letter said, to put the sea
+coast into a "fencible arraye of warre."<a id="noteref_1493" name="noteref_1493" href="#note_1493"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1493</span></span></a> The men<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page490">[pg 490]</span><a name="Pg490" id="Pg490" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+were ordered to muster at the Leadenhall on the
+18th September.<a id="noteref_1494" name="noteref_1494" href="#note_1494"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1494</span></span></a> The aim and object of the expedition
+was set out in a "boke" or proclamation.<a id="noteref_1495" name="noteref_1495" href="#note_1495"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1495</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Soldiers for the defence of Havre. 1563.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">In 1563 a peace was patched up, and the Catholics
+and Huguenots united in demanding from Elizabeth
+the restoration of Havre. The queen refused to
+surrender the town, and again called upon the City of
+London to furnish her with 1,000 men for the purpose
+of enabling her to secure Havre, and to compel the
+French to surrender Calais as promised.<a id="noteref_1496" name="noteref_1496" href="#note_1496"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1496</span></span></a> The Court
+of Aldermen hesitated to raise so large a force, and
+sent a deputation of three of their court to wait upon
+the lords of the Privy Council the same afternoon,
+with a view to having the number reduced to 500 on
+the ground that the City had supplied so many soldiers
+during the past year.<a id="noteref_1497" name="noteref_1497" href="#note_1497"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1497</span></span></a> The deputation having reported
+to the court the next day (3 July) that the Privy
+Council would make no abatement in the number of
+soldiers to be furnished, it was agreed to renew the
+application.<a id="noteref_1498" name="noteref_1498" href="#note_1498"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1498</span></span></a> Again the City's request was refused,
+and the full number of 1,000 men was apportioned
+among the livery companies.<a id="noteref_1499" name="noteref_1499" href="#note_1499"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1499</span></span></a> The citizens, jealous
+as they always were of the stranger within their gates,
+availed themselves of a too literal interpretation of
+a royal proclamation and seized all the Frenchmen
+they could find in the city with all their belongings.
+They even went so far as to attack the house of the
+French ambassador, and would probably have gone<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page491">[pg 491]</span><a name="Pg491" id="Pg491" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc274" id="toc274"></a>
+yet further lengths had they not been stopt by
+peremptory orders from the queen.<a id="noteref_1500" name="noteref_1500" href="#note_1500"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1500</span></span></a></p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">On the 8th July the City was informed by letter
+from the queen that the French had already commenced
+the siege of Havre, and was asked to have
+400 out of the 1,000 men ready to set sail with Lord
+Clinton by the 16th.<a id="noteref_1501" name="noteref_1501" href="#note_1501"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1501</span></span></a> This letter was immediately
+followed by another from Lord Clinton summoning
+every inhabitant of the city "usinge the exercise of
+eny kynde of water crafte" before the lord high
+admiral or his deputy at Deptford on a certain day.<a id="noteref_1502" name="noteref_1502" href="#note_1502"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1502</span></span></a>
+The Common Hunt, the city's water-bailiffs, two
+sergeants-at-mace and two sheriff's officers were
+appointed by the Court of Aldermen to "conduct"
+the city's contingent to the fleet lying in the Thames.<a id="noteref_1503" name="noteref_1503" href="#note_1503"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1503</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The loss of Havre, July, 1563.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Before the end of July Havre was lost.<a id="noteref_1504" name="noteref_1504" href="#note_1504"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1504</span></span></a> The
+garrison had been attacked by a plague, which for
+more than a twelvemonth had been rampant in
+London,<a id="noteref_1505" name="noteref_1505" href="#note_1505"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1505</span></span></a> and the Earl of Warwick, the commander
+of the town, found himself compelled to accept such
+terms as he could obtain. The garrison was allowed
+to leave with all munitions of war. Whilst proclaiming
+to her subjects the surrender of the town—not
+through any cowardice on the part of the garrison,
+but owing to a "plage of infectuous mortall sickness"<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page492">[pg 492]</span><a name="Pg492" id="Pg492" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+inflicted by the Almighty—Elizabeth pleaded for
+tender care and charity to be shown to the soldiers
+on their return, due precaution being taken by the
+principal officers of every city, town and parish against
+the spread of infection.<a id="noteref_1506" name="noteref_1506" href="#note_1506"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1506</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Peace between England and France signed, 13 April, 1564.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The approaching end of the war with France is
+foreshadowed by an order of the Court of Aldermen
+(25 Nov., 1563) touching the re-delivery to the various
+civic companies of the "harness" which they severally
+provided for the war, and which had been forwarded
+from Portsmouth and was lying in the Guildhall
+Chapel.<a id="noteref_1507" name="noteref_1507" href="#note_1507"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1507</span></span></a> Peace was signed on the 13th April, 1564,
+and on the 31st July a proclamation was issued for
+disbanding the navy.<a id="noteref_1508" name="noteref_1508" href="#note_1508"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1508</span></span></a> Throughout the war Elizabeth
+had been careful to keep on good terms with Spain,
+and English vessels found molesting Spanish ships
+under pretext of searching for French goods were
+ordered to be arrested.<a id="noteref_1509" name="noteref_1509" href="#note_1509"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1509</span></span></a> An interruption of commerce
+with Flanders had been threatened, owing to
+the Duchess of Parma having forbidden the importation
+of English woollen cloth into the Low Countries
+for fear of infection from the plague, but Elizabeth
+retaliated by closing English ports to all Flemish
+vessels, and matters were accommodated.<a id="noteref_1510" name="noteref_1510" href="#note_1510"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1510</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The restoration of St. Paul's Cathedral, 1561-1565.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The period of peace and tranquillity which
+ensued enabled the citizens to bestow more attention
+on their own affairs. Their cathedral stood in urgent
+need of repairs. Its steeple had been struck by
+lightning in 1561, and 3,000 marks had already been<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page493">[pg 493]</span><a name="Pg493" id="Pg493" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc275" id="toc275"></a>
+expended on its restoration.<a id="noteref_1511" name="noteref_1511" href="#note_1511"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1511</span></span></a> An application to the
+City from the lord treasurer in 1565 for a sum of
+£300 towards roofing one of the aisles of the
+cathedral came as a surprise to the Court of Aldermen,
+who caused enquiries to be made as to the
+receipt and delivery of contributions already made,
+and returned for answer that the City of London
+had long ago delivered "all such mony as the
+sayd cyty dyd at eny tyme grant or agree to geve
+or paye towards the sayd work." His lordship
+was desired "no further to charge or burden the sayd
+cytye w<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="vertical-align: super">th</span></span> the payment of any more mony towards
+the sayd work."<a id="noteref_1512" name="noteref_1512" href="#note_1512"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1512</span></span></a> Nevertheless the City was called
+upon for a further contribution two years later
+(June, 1567), when negotiations were entered into
+between the City, the Bishop of London and the
+Dean and Chapter of Saint Paul's, which ended in the
+Corporation agreeing to find forty foders of lead for
+roofing the south aisle of the cathedral, and lending
+a sum of £150 to the bishop and the dean and
+chapter, on condition the latter granted a further lease
+to the City of the manor of Finsbury for a term of
+200 years beyond the term yet unexpired.<a id="noteref_1513" name="noteref_1513" href="#note_1513"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1513</span></span></a> Whilst
+repairs were being carried out in the cathedral itself,
+something was also being done outside the building
+to render the accommodation for hearing the sermons
+preached at Paul's Cross more convenient for the
+mayor and aldermen and municipal officers. A gutter<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page494">[pg 494]</span><a name="Pg494" id="Pg494" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+which conducted rainwater upon the heads of the
+lord mayor's suite at sermon time was removed; the
+bench on which the civic officials sat was enlarged
+for their better convenience, and places erected for
+the accommodation of aldermen's wives.<a id="noteref_1514" name="noteref_1514" href="#note_1514"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1514</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Sir Thomas Gresham and the City Burse. 1565-1566.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The rapid increase of commerce under the
+fostering care of Elizabeth rendered the erection of
+a Burse or Exchange for the accommodation of
+merchants "to treate of their feate of merchandyzes"
+a pressing necessity. The matter had been mooted
+thirty years before, but little had been done beyond
+ascertaining the opinion of merchants as to the most
+convenient site.<a id="noteref_1515" name="noteref_1515" href="#note_1515"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1515</span></span></a> The project, however, took root in
+the mind of Sir Richard Gresham, an alderman of the
+city, whose business had occasionally carried him to
+Antwerp, where he became familiar with the Burse
+that had been recently set up there, and in 1537 (the
+year that he was elected mayor) he forwarded to
+Thomas Cromwell, then lord privy seal, a design for
+a similar Burse to be erected in London. Finding
+little or no attention paid to his communication he
+again (25 July, 1538) wrote to Cromwell suggesting
+the erection of a Burse in Lombard Street—the site
+favoured by city merchants—at a cost of £2,000. If
+the lord privy seal would but bring pressure to bear
+upon Sir George Monoux, a brother alderman but a
+man of "noe gentyll nature," to part with certain
+property at cost price, he (Gresham) would undertake<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page495">[pg 495]</span><a name="Pg495" id="Pg495" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc276" id="toc276"></a>
+to raise £1,000 towards the building before he went
+out of office, and he would himself carry Cromwell's
+letter to Monoux and "handle him" as best he
+could.<a id="noteref_1516" name="noteref_1516" href="#note_1516"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1516</span></span></a> This application had the desired effect. On
+the 13th August Henry VIII addressed a letter to
+Monoux desiring him to dispose of certain tenements
+about Lombard Street which were required for the
+commonweal of merchants of the city, and to come
+to terms with Gresham as to the amount to be paid
+for them. Both parties having referred the matter
+to Sir Richard Rich, Chancellor of the Court of
+Augmentations of the Crown, as arbitrator, the City
+agreed to pay a yearly sum of twenty marks for the
+houses that were required. Monoux refusing to accept
+this sum, another letter was despatched to him from
+the king urging him not to stand in the way of a
+project so useful to merchants and tending so much
+to the "beautifitye" of the city. To this second
+appeal Monoux gave way, and received the cordial
+thanks of Henry by letter dated the 25th November.<a id="noteref_1517" name="noteref_1517" href="#note_1517"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1517</span></span></a>
+Nothing more was done in the matter until it was
+taken up many years later by Sir Thomas Gresham,
+son of Sir Richard.<a id="noteref_1518" name="noteref_1518" href="#note_1518"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1518</span></span></a> Acting, as he did for a long
+succession of years, as Queen Elizabeth's agent in
+Flanders, Sir Thomas spent much of his time in
+Antwerp.<a id="noteref_1519" name="noteref_1519" href="#note_1519"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1519</span></span></a> When he was not there himself he<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page496">[pg 496]</span><a name="Pg496" id="Pg496" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+employed a factor in the person of Richard Clough to
+conduct his affairs. In 1561 this Richard Clough, in
+a letter addressed to his principal from Antwerp
+(31 Dec.),<a id="noteref_1520" name="noteref_1520" href="#note_1520"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1520</span></span></a> expressed much astonishment at the City
+of London being so far behind continental towns:—"Consideryng
+what a sittey London ys, and that in
+so many yeres they have nott founde the menes to
+make a bourse! but must walke in the raine, when
+ytt raineth, more lyker pedlers then marchants; and
+in thys countrie, and all other, there is no kynde
+of pepell that have occasion to meete, butt they
+have a plase meete for that pourpose." Indeed,
+Clough got quite excited over the thought that
+London, of all cities in the world, possessed no decent
+accommodation for merchants transacting their everyday
+business, and declared his readiness to build "so
+fere a bourse in London as the grett bourse is in
+Andwarpe" and that "withhoutt molestyng of any
+man more than he shulld be well dysposyd to geve."</p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">It was not long before Gresham made up his
+mind that London should have a Burse, and in May,
+1563, the Court of Aldermen deputed Lionel Duckett,
+who was also a mercer, to sound Gresham as to "his
+benevolence towards the makyng of a burse."<a id="noteref_1521" name="noteref_1521" href="#note_1521"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1521</span></span></a> But
+however desirous Gresham might be to prosecute the
+work, he was prevented from doing so by stress
+of business. Commercial difficulties arose between
+England and the Low Countries owing to the proclamation
+of the Duchess of Parma. Up to the year
+1564 Gresham was forced to make Antwerp his place
+of abode, and could only occasionally visit London;<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page497">[pg 497]</span><a name="Pg497" id="Pg497" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc277" id="toc277"></a>
+since that time, however, his business allowed him
+to look upon London as his permanent residence, and
+he only crossed over to Antwerp when special circumstances
+rendered it necessary. An additional
+reason for the delay in carrying out Gresham's project
+may perhaps be found in the fact that, during his
+absence on the queen's business in 1563, Elizabeth
+had, with her usual parsimony, cut down Gresham's
+allowance of twenty shillings a day for "his diets."
+Gresham complained bitterly of this abridgment of his
+income in a letter to Secretary Cecil, and also in another
+letter couched in more guarded terms to the queen
+herself.<a id="noteref_1522" name="noteref_1522" href="#note_1522"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1522</span></span></a> In both letters he set out the sum total of
+the money (£830,000) which he had negotiated for
+the queen, and referred to his having broken a leg in
+her majesty's service and to his declining years. Whatever
+may have been the cause of the delay, it was
+not until the 4th January, 1565, that a definite offer
+was made by Gresham to erect a "comely burse" at
+his own cost and charge, provided the City would
+furnish a suitable site. This offer was accepted.<a id="noteref_1523" name="noteref_1523" href="#note_1523"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1523</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Difficulties of obtaining a site.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Difficulties at once presented themselves in finding
+a site. It was originally proposed to obtain from
+the Merchant Taylors' Company a plot of land
+between Lombard Street and Cornhill, but the company
+refused to part with the property and a new site
+had to be chosen.<a id="noteref_1524" name="noteref_1524" href="#note_1524"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1524</span></span></a> No sooner was this done, and a
+place selected to the north of Cornhill, than a difficulty
+arose between the City and the Dean and Chapter of
+Canterbury as to the terms of purchase.<a id="noteref_1525" name="noteref_1525" href="#note_1525"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1525</span></span></a> This having
+been successfully overcome and the site purchased,<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page498">[pg 498]</span><a name="Pg498" id="Pg498" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+the next step was to invite subscriptions, not only
+from members of the livery companies, but from
+merchant adventurers beyond the sea.<a id="noteref_1526" name="noteref_1526" href="#note_1526"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1526</span></span></a> Such a liberal
+response was made to this invitation<a id="noteref_1527" name="noteref_1527" href="#note_1527"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1527</span></span></a> that on the
+7th June, 1566, Sir Thomas Gresham was able to lay
+the first stone of the new building, a deed of trust
+between the City and Gresham having previously
+(14 May) been executed.<a id="noteref_1528" name="noteref_1528" href="#note_1528"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1528</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Strong foreign element in connection with the building of the first Burse.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">It is curious to note the strong foreign element
+in connection with the building of Gresham's Burse.
+The architect as well as the design of the building came
+from abroad. The clerk of the works (Henryk)<a id="noteref_1529" name="noteref_1529" href="#note_1529"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1529</span></span></a>
+and most of the workmen were foreigners, Gresham
+having obtained special permission from the Court of
+Aldermen for their employment.<a id="noteref_1530" name="noteref_1530" href="#note_1530"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1530</span></span></a> Most of the
+material for structural as well as ornamental purposes
+(saving 100,000 bricks provided by the City)<a id="noteref_1531" name="noteref_1531" href="#note_1531"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1531</span></span></a> came
+from abroad, and to this day the Royal Exchange is
+paved with small blocks of Turkish hone-stones believed
+to have been imported in Gresham's day, and
+to have been relaid after the several fires of 1666
+and 1838. It was the employment of these strangers
+which probably gave rise to an order of the Court of
+Aldermen (19 June, 1567) that an officer should be
+appointed to attend at the Burse daily "for a competent
+season," to see that no "misorder" be done
+to any of the artificers or other workmen there<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page499">[pg 499]</span><a name="Pg499" id="Pg499" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc278" id="toc278"></a>
+employed, and to commit to ward any that he should
+find so-doing.<a id="noteref_1532" name="noteref_1532" href="#note_1532"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1532</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The Burse opened by Q. Elizabeth, 23 Jan., 1571.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">By the 22nd December, 1568, the Burse was so
+far complete as to allow of merchants holding their
+meetings within its walls, but it was not until the
+23rd January, 1571, that the queen herself visited it
+in state and caused it thenceforth to be called the
+Royal Exchange. Her statue which graced the
+building bore testimony to the care and interest she
+always displayed in fostering commercial enterprise.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Wanton damage done to the new Burse.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">On the door of a staircase leading up to a "pawne"
+or covered walk on the south side of the building
+there had been set up the arms and crest of Gresham
+himself, which some evilly disposed person took it
+into his head to deface. A proclamation made by
+the mayor (16 Feb., 1569) for the apprehension of the
+culprit does not appear from the city's records to
+have proved successful.<a id="noteref_1533" name="noteref_1533" href="#note_1533"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1533</span></span></a> Some years later (21 March,
+1577) the mayor had occasion to issue another proclamation
+for the discovery of persons who had
+defaced and pulled away "certen peces of timber
+fixed to thendes and comers of the seates"<a id="noteref_1534" name="noteref_1534" href="#note_1534"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1534</span></span></a> in the
+Royal Exchange, with what result we know not.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Insurance business carried on at the Royal Exchange.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">In 1574 the Court of Aldermen appointed a
+committee to confer with Gresham touching the
+"assurance" of the Royal Exchange.<a id="noteref_1535" name="noteref_1535" href="#note_1535"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1535</span></span></a> The connection
+between the new Burse and insurance is
+remarkable. The principle of insurance policies had<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page500">[pg 500]</span><a name="Pg500" id="Pg500" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+been introduced into the city by the Lombards as early
+as the thirteenth century,<a id="noteref_1536" name="noteref_1536" href="#note_1536"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1536</span></span></a> and a Lombard Street
+policy became a familiar term.<a id="noteref_1537" name="noteref_1537" href="#note_1537"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1537</span></span></a> When the Lombard
+Street merchants quitted their old premises for the
+more commodious Exchange they carried thither their
+insurance business with them, and a part of the new
+building was devoted exclusively to this branch of
+commerce. A grant of letters patent which Elizabeth
+made to Richard Candler for the making of policies
+and registering of assurances within the city was
+objected to by the Court of Aldermen, as being contrary
+to the liberties of the City, and a deputation
+was appointed to wait upon the lords of the Privy
+Council to have it revoked.<a id="noteref_1538" name="noteref_1538" href="#note_1538"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1538</span></span></a> This was early in 1575.
+A year later we find Candler making answer to a bill
+of fees drawn up by certain aldermen and citizens of
+London, respecting his office.<a id="noteref_1539" name="noteref_1539" href="#note_1539"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1539</span></span></a></p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">In order to put an end to the frequent disputes
+which arose in the Royal Exchange among merchants
+on matters of insurance, the Court of Aldermen
+appointed two of their number to consider the difficulty
+and to report thereon. They made their report
+to the court on the 29th January, 1577.<a id="noteref_1540" name="noteref_1540" href="#note_1540"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1540</span></span></a> They had,
+in accordance with the oft-repeated desire expressed<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page501">[pg 501]</span><a name="Pg501" id="Pg501" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc279" id="toc279"></a>
+to previous lord mayors by the lords of the Privy
+Council, consulted with their brethren the aldermen,
+as well as with merchants of the city, both Englishmen
+and foreigners, and had drawn up orders agreeable
+to those that had hitherto been used in Lombard
+Street, to which all countries had been accustomed to
+submit. The orders, however, not yet being completed,
+the Court of Aldermen decided upon appointing
+arbitrators from year to year to deal with all matters
+of insurance, and so relieve the lords of the Privy
+Council of the trouble which they had hitherto
+experienced on that score at a time when they had
+weightier matters to attend to. The arbitrators were
+to receive one penny in the pound amongst them in all
+cases, whether the claim were for whole losses, part,<a id="noteref_1541" name="noteref_1541" href="#note_1541"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1541</span></span></a>
+or averages. Their decision was to bind both assurer
+and assured, and they were to sit twice a week
+(Monday and Thursday) "in the offyce howse of
+assurances" in the Royal Exchange. They were to
+be attended by the "register of assurances," whose
+business it was to summon witnesses. A poor-box
+was to be provided, to which the party assured, on
+judgment, should contribute twelve pence.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Music and football at the Exchange.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">On Sundays and holy days the Exchange was
+enlivened during a portion of the year with the music
+of the city waits, who were ordered by the Court of
+Aldermen (April, 1572) to play on their instruments
+as they had hitherto been accustomed at the Royal
+Exchange, from seven o'clock till eight o'clock in the<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page502">[pg 502]</span><a name="Pg502" id="Pg502" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+evening up to the Feast of Pentecost, after which
+they were to commence playing at eight p.m., and
+"to hold on" till nine p.m. up to Michaelmas.<a id="noteref_1542" name="noteref_1542" href="#note_1542"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1542</span></span></a> There
+is another circumstance connected with the same
+building that deserves a passing notice, which is that
+football used to be played within its walls, a game
+forbidden in 1576 to be played any longer either there
+or in any of the city's wards.<a id="noteref_1543" name="noteref_1543" href="#note_1543"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1543</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Gresham College and Lectures.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The citizens of London are indebted to Sir
+Thomas Gresham for something more than their
+Royal Exchange. By will dated 5th July, 1575,
+proved and enrolled in the Court of Husting,<a id="noteref_1544" name="noteref_1544" href="#note_1544"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1544</span></span></a>
+Gresham disposed of the reversion of the Royal
+Exchange and of his mansion-house in the parish of
+St. Helen, Bishopsgate, after the decease of his wife,
+to the mayor and corporation of the city and to the
+wardens and commonalty of the Mercers' Company in
+equal moieties in trust (<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">inter alia</span></span>) for the maintenance
+of seven lectures on the several subjects of Divinity,
+Astronomy, Music, Geometry, Law, Physic and
+Rhetoric. In 1596 these two corporate bodies came
+into possession of the property, and in the following
+year drew up ordinances for the regulation of the
+various lectures. According to the terms of Gresham's
+will the lectures were delivered at Gresham House.
+When Gresham House, which escaped the Fire of
+London, became dilapidated, the City and the
+Company on more than one occasion petitioned
+Parliament for leave to pull it down and to erect
+another building on its site. The proposal, however,
+was not entertained, but in the year 1767 an Act was<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page503">[pg 503]</span><a name="Pg503" id="Pg503" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc280" id="toc280"></a>
+passed vesting Gresham House in the Crown for the
+purpose of an Excise Office, and providing for the
+payment by the Crown to the City and Company of
+a perpetual annuity of £500 per annum. For some
+time the lectures ceased to be delivered for lack of
+accommodation. When they were next delivered it
+was at the City of London School, where they continued
+until Gresham College was erected in Basinghall
+Street.<a id="noteref_1545" name="noteref_1545" href="#note_1545"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1545</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The Act of Uniformity strictly enforced, 1565.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">In the meantime Protestantism had been gaining
+ground in England as well as on the continent.
+Many who in the evil days of the Marian persecution
+had sought refuge in Switzerland and Germany had
+returned to England as soon as they were assured of
+safety under Elizabeth, and had introduced into the
+country the religious tenets of Calvin they had learnt
+abroad. Elizabeth found herself confronted not only
+by Catholics but by Puritans. As she felt herself
+seated more strongly on the throne she determined
+to enforce more strictly than hitherto the Act of
+Uniformity. In 1565 the London clergy were ordered
+to wear the surplice and to conform in other particulars.
+Between thirty and forty of them—and those
+the most intelligent and active of them—refused and
+resigned their cures. Their congregations supported
+them, and thus a large body of good Protestants were
+driven into opposition. But there all action against
+them ceased. It was otherwise with the Protestants
+on the continent, where a determination arrived at in
+the same year that Elizabeth enforced the Act of Uniformity,
+to suppress heresy, led to the most horrible<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page504">[pg 504]</span><a name="Pg504" id="Pg504" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+persecution, and drove many of the inhabitants to
+seek refuge in England.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Gresham's hospitality to Cardinal Chastillon, 1568.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Of the hundreds of foreigners who sought this
+country, driven from France or Spain by religious
+persecution,<a id="noteref_1546" name="noteref_1546" href="#note_1546"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1546</span></span></a> none was more hospitably received than
+the brother of the great Coligny, the Cardinal
+Chastillon. The Bishop of London having excused
+himself entertaining the cardinal at Fulham, his
+eminence was lodged and hospitably treated for a
+whole week by Gresham. During his visit he paid a
+visit, Huguenot as he was, to the French Church
+established in the city, where his co-religionists were
+allowed to worship without fear of molestation. He
+further paid his host the compliment of visiting the
+Exchange, then approaching completion. At the end
+of the week he removed to Sion House, where
+accommodation had been found for him.<a id="noteref_1547" name="noteref_1547" href="#note_1547"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1547</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The city crowded with refugees from the continent.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The influx of refugees from the continent was
+far from being an unmixed blessing. Whilst some
+settled peacefully down and taught the London artizan
+the art of silk-weaving, others betook themselves to
+the river's side, where they defied the civic authorities.<a id="noteref_1548" name="noteref_1548" href="#note_1548"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1548</span></span></a>
+A fresh return was ordered to be made of their number.<a id="noteref_1549" name="noteref_1549" href="#note_1549"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1549</span></span></a>
+It became necessary to forbid aliens remaining
+in the city more than a day and a night; they might
+reside in other places if they liked, but not in the city
+of London.<a id="noteref_1550" name="noteref_1550" href="#note_1550"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1550</span></span></a> Mortality increased so much that a<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page505">[pg 505]</span><a name="Pg505" id="Pg505" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc281" id="toc281"></a>
+committee hud to be appointed (March, 1569) "to
+peruse about the cytie where apte and convenient
+places maye be had and founde for the buryall of
+the deade in tyme of plage and other tymes of gret
+deathe," and to report thereon to the Court of
+Aldermen.<a id="noteref_1551" name="noteref_1551" href="#note_1551"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1551</span></span></a> An acre of ground, more or less, near
+Bethlem Hospital was subsequently prepared as a
+cemetery by the civic authorities,<a id="noteref_1552" name="noteref_1552" href="#note_1552"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1552</span></span></a> whilst a friend of
+the mayor agreed under certain conditions to enclose
+it with a wall, erect a pulpit and make other improvements
+at his own cost.<a id="noteref_1553" name="noteref_1553" href="#note_1553"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1553</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The Prince of Orange receives substantial assistance from the citizens.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">In the course of time the persecuted Netherlanders
+took heart of grace, encouraged by the gallant
+conduct of the Prince of Orange, their leader, no less
+than by the active assistance and sympathy of their
+brethren in England, who were continually passing to
+and fro with munitions of war, in spite of proclamations
+to the contrary.<a id="noteref_1554" name="noteref_1554" href="#note_1554"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1554</span></span></a> "Whilst Elizabeth dribbled
+out her secret aid to the Prince of Orange the London
+traders sent him half-a-million from their own purses,
+a sum equal to a year's revenue of the Crown."<a id="noteref_1555" name="noteref_1555" href="#note_1555"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1555</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The decline of Antwerp London's opportunity.</span></div></div>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The queen applies to the merchant adventurers for a loan.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The decline of Antwerp which followed Alva's
+administration marks the foundation of London's
+supremacy in the world of commerce. Hitherto the
+queen had been accustomed through Gresham, her<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page506">[pg 506]</span><a name="Pg506" id="Pg506" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+factor, to raise what money she required by loans from
+merchants abroad. Merchant strangers were well
+content to lend her money at ten or twelve per cent.,
+seeing that the City of London was as often as not
+called upon to give bonds for repayment by way of
+collateral security.<a id="noteref_1556" name="noteref_1556" href="#note_1556"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1556</span></span></a> When that door was closed to
+her she turned to her own subjects, the Company of
+Merchant Adventurers, to whom she had shown considerable
+favour. Her first application to this company
+for a loan was, to her great surprise, refused. The
+matter was afterwards accommodated through the
+intervention of Sir Thomas Gresham; and as the
+confidence of the city merchants increased, loans were
+afterwards frequently negotiated between them and
+the Crown, much to the convenience of one party and
+to the advantage of the other.<a id="noteref_1557" name="noteref_1557" href="#note_1557"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1557</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The first public lottery, 1567-1569.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">As another means of raising money Elizabeth had
+resort to a lottery—the first public lottery ever held
+in London, although the game called "The Lott" was
+not unknown in the city in the reign of Henry VIII.<a id="noteref_1558" name="noteref_1558" href="#note_1558"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1558</span></span></a>
+The lottery was advertised in 1567 as being a very
+rich lottery general, without any blanks, containing a
+number of good prizes of ready-money, plate and
+divers sorts of merchandise, the same having been
+valued by expert and skilful men. The lottery was,
+as we should say at the present day, "under the
+immediate patronage" of the queen herself, and the
+proceeds, after deducting expenses, were to be devoted
+to the repair of harbours and other public works conducive
+to strengthening the realm. Besides the prizes, of<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page507">[pg 507]</span><a name="Pg507" id="Pg507" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc282" id="toc282"></a>
+which a long list is set out in the city's records, there
+were to be three "welcomes" or bonuses given to the
+first three winners of lots. The first person to whom
+a lot should happen to fall was to have for "welcome"
+a piece of silver-gilt plate of the value of £50, and
+the second and third fortunate drawers were to have
+respectively, in addition to their prizes, a piece of gilt
+plate of the value of £20. The prizes, the chief of
+which amounted to £5,000 sterling, although the
+winner was to receive only £3,000 in cash, the rest
+being taken out in plate and tapestry,<a id="noteref_1559" name="noteref_1559" href="#note_1559"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1559</span></span></a> were exhibited
+in Cheapside at the sign of the Queen's Arms, the house
+of Antony Derick, goldsmith to Elizabeth and engraver
+to the Mint in this and the preceding reign.<a id="noteref_1560" name="noteref_1560" href="#note_1560"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1560</span></span></a> The
+mayor and aldermen agreed to put into the lottery
+thirty "billes or lottes" at the least under one posy,
+viz.:—<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">God preserve the Cytye of London quod M and A.</span></span>
+Any profit that might arise from the lots was to be
+equally divided between them.<a id="noteref_1561" name="noteref_1561" href="#note_1561"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1561</span></span></a></p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The livery companies of the city were also invited
+to subscribe to the lottery as well as the Company of
+Merchant Adventurers.<a id="noteref_1562" name="noteref_1562" href="#note_1562"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1562</span></span></a> On the 4th August the livery
+of the Merchant Taylors' Company were summoned
+to their hall to declare the amount each individual was
+ready to venture—"all under our posy in the name of
+this Common Hall," the posy subsequently determined
+upon being the following:—</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-lg" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em; margin-top: 1.00em">
+<div class="tei tei-l" style="text-align: left; margin-left: 2.00em">"One byrde in hande is worthe two in the woode,</div>
+<div class="tei tei-l" style="text-align: left; margin-left: 2.00em">Yff wee have the greate lott it will do us good."<a id="noteref_1563" name="noteref_1563" href="#note_1563"><span class="tei tei-noteref" style="text-align: left"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1563</span></span></a></div>
+</div>
+
+<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page508">[pg 508]</span><a name="Pg508" id="Pg508" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The "reading" of the lottery was postponed till
+the 10th January, 1569.<a id="noteref_1564" name="noteref_1564" href="#note_1564"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1564</span></span></a> It took place at the west
+door of St. Paul's, commencing on the 11th day of
+that month, and continued day and night until the
+6th May following.<a id="noteref_1565" name="noteref_1565" href="#note_1565"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1565</span></span></a> It was reported at the time that
+Elizabeth withdrew a large sum of the prize-money
+for her own use previous to the drawing of the lots,
+and this report, whether well founded or not, created
+no little disgust among the subscribers.<a id="noteref_1566" name="noteref_1566" href="#note_1566"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1566</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">English merchants in Antwerp arrested by order of Alva, 1568.</span></div></div>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Elizabeth retaliates by seizing treasure on board Spanish vessels.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Before the close of 1568 Alva had severed the
+last links connecting England with the Low Countries
+by suddenly seizing and imprisoning all English merchants
+found at Antwerp on the ground that certain
+Spanish treasure-ships had been detained in England.
+Such conduct on his part was characterized by
+Elizabeth as "verie straunge and hertofore in no tyme
+used betwixt the Crowne of England and the House
+of Burgondye w<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="vertical-align: super">t</span></span> owt some manner of former conferrence
+proceedyng and intelligence had of the
+myndes and intentions of the prynces themselves
+on both sides," and she forthwith issued a proclamation
+for the seizure of Spanish vessels and
+merchants found in English ports by way of reprisal.<a id="noteref_1567" name="noteref_1567" href="#note_1567"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1567</span></span></a>
+She was careful to show that any former detention of
+Spanish vessels served as a mere pretence for Alva's
+conduct. Certain Spanish vessels of small tonnage,<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page509">[pg 509]</span><a name="Pg509" id="Pg509" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc283" id="toc283"></a>
+called "zabras," had, it was true, entered English
+harbours in the west country, and the bullion and
+merchandise had been discharged on English soil; but
+all this had been done in order to prevent the ships
+and cargo falling into the hands of the French ships
+which threatened them. Some of the treasure had
+been even "borrowed"; but this was not contrary to
+the honorable usage of princes in their own dominions.
+The Spanish ambassador had called upon her majesty
+to ask that the vessels and cargo might be given up,
+"pretending the monye to appertaine to the king his
+maister," which her majesty had declared her willingness
+to assent to as soon as she should have had
+communication from the west country. The ambassador,
+who was asked to return in four or five
+days to receive the ships and treasure, had failed to
+appear, and her surprise was great to find that orders
+had been given for the arrest of her subjects at
+Antwerp on the very day (29 Oct.) that the Spanish
+ambassador was with her majesty. Such was the
+account of the matter as given in the queen's proclamation
+to the citizens of London. But there are
+other and contradictory accounts. Whoever may
+have been the rightful owner of the treasure, which
+in all probability was on its way to Flanders for
+payment of Alva's soldiers,<a id="noteref_1568" name="noteref_1568" href="#note_1568"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1568</span></span></a> the opportunity of
+dealing a blow to Spain and at the same time of
+replenishing the Exchequer at home afforded by the
+presence of the ships in English waters was thought
+too good to be lost.</p>
+
+<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page510">[pg 510]</span><a name="Pg510" id="Pg510" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Order to seize Flemish merchants and their goods in London, Jan., 1569.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">On the 5th January the mayor received orders
+from Sir Nicholas Bacon to seize all Flemings' goods
+to the queen's use, inasmuch as it was quite possible
+that what had taken place in Flanders had been
+done without the King of Spain's commission. The
+following day the mayor informed the council that he
+had arrested the bodies and goods of certain merchant
+strangers in the city.<a id="noteref_1569" name="noteref_1569" href="#note_1569"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1569</span></span></a> Throughout the greater part of
+the month frequent letters passed between the city,
+the merchant adventurers, the merchants of the
+staple and the lords of the council concerning Alva's
+proceedings and measures to be taken by way of
+reprisal. The citizens showed themselves very
+anxious to devise measures of retaliation and to avail
+themselves to the utmost of the opportunity afforded
+them of avenging themselves of their foreign rivals,
+as the following memorial signed by the mayor and
+nine of the principal merchants of the city proves:—<a id="noteref_1570" name="noteref_1570" href="#note_1570"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1570</span></span></a></p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">"First, we doe thinck it very needfull and necessary
+that w<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="vertical-align: super">th</span></span> all possible speed the bodies, shipps
+and goodes of all the subiects of the said king be
+had under arrest, and their bodies to be sequestred
+from their houses, comptinghouses, books, warehouses
+and goods; and they themselves to be
+committed unto severall and sure custodie and
+keeping. And that alsoe comission may be granted
+to sage persons to enquire and trie out all coulorable
+transports and contracts don since the <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-variant: small-caps">XX</span></span><span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="vertical-align: super">th</span></span> of
+December last by any of the subiects of the said<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page511">[pg 511]</span><a name="Pg511" id="Pg511" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc284" id="toc284"></a>
+king or by any other nation. And that a proclamation
+be made by the queene's ma<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="vertical-align: super">tes</span></span> aucthorite
+forthw<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="vertical-align: super">th</span></span> for the avoiding of collorable bargaines,
+transports and contracts hereafter to be made."</p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Thomas Rowe<a id="noteref_1571" name="noteref_1571" href="#note_1571"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1571</span></span></a> (he had not yet received the
+honour of knighthood), who was mayor at the time,
+happened to be a connection by marriage of Sir
+Thomas Gresham, having married Mary, the eldest
+daughter of Sir John Gresham, of Titsey, Sir Thomas's
+uncle. It was owing to this connection that the
+mayor received information of Alva's arbitrary proceedings
+before the news reached the ears of Secretary
+Cecil; for Gresham's factor at Antwerp, Richard
+Clough, had lost no time in despatching a special
+messenger to his master, who, immediately after
+hearing the news, broke in upon the mayor's slumbers
+at twelve o'clock on the night of the 3rd January in
+order to communicate the same to him. The next
+morning the mayor wrote to Sir William Cecil
+informing him of what had occurred and how under
+the circumstances he (the mayor) had taken upon
+himself to stay the despatch of letters abroad for a
+while.<a id="noteref_1572" name="noteref_1572" href="#note_1572"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1572</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Alva's envoy demands restitution.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Towards the end of January, 1569, the Duke of
+Alva sent over an agent, Monsieur D'Assoleville, to
+demand the restitution of the treasure. The mayor
+deputed John Gresham and another to escort the<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page512">[pg 512]</span><a name="Pg512" id="Pg512" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+envoy from Gravesend to London, where he was
+lodged at Crosby Place, at that time the mansion
+house of William Bond, alderman of Candlewick
+Street Ward.<a id="noteref_1573" name="noteref_1573" href="#note_1573"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1573</span></span></a> At first he demanded an audience
+with the queen herself, but was fain to be content
+with a reference to her council.<a id="noteref_1574" name="noteref_1574" href="#note_1574"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1574</span></span></a> The treasure in the
+meantime had been removed to London for greater
+security.<a id="noteref_1575" name="noteref_1575" href="#note_1575"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1575</span></span></a> Negotiations proving fruitless the agent
+returned to Antwerp, "having succeeded in obtaining
+from Elizabeth nothing beyond the assurance that
+she was ready to surrender the treasure when his
+master promised indemnity to all her subjects in the
+Low Countries, and agreed solemnly to ratify the
+ancient treaty of alliance between the Crown of
+England and the House of Burgundy."<a id="noteref_1576" name="noteref_1576" href="#note_1576"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1576</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Gresham suggests minting the Spanish treasure, 14 Aug., 1569.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">That such a large amount of treasure should be
+lying idle did not commend itself to the mind of so
+astute a financier as Sir Thomas Gresham. He
+accordingly suggested to Sir William Cecil by letter
+(14 Aug., 1569) that the queen should cause it to be
+minted into her own coin, and thereby make a profit
+of £3,000 or £4,000. As for repayment, her majesty
+could effect it by way of exchange, to her great profit,
+or give bonds for a year or more to the merchants
+who owned the money, and who, in Gresham's opinion,
+would willingly accede to such proposal.<a id="noteref_1577" name="noteref_1577" href="#note_1577"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1577</span></span></a> Bold as
+this suggestion was, it appears, nevertheless, to have
+been carried into execution.<a id="noteref_1578" name="noteref_1578" href="#note_1578"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1578</span></span></a></p>
+
+<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page513">[pg 513]</span><a name="Pg513" id="Pg513" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc285" id="toc285"></a>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The City Courts closed to Spanish suitors, 11 July, 1570.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The hardships already experienced by Spanish
+merchants from stoppage of commercial intercourse
+with England must have been materially increased the
+following year by an order of the Court of Aldermen
+(11 July, 1570) to the effect that all matters and suits
+brought by merchant strangers, subjects of the King
+of Spain, in any of the Queen's Majesty's Courts
+within the city of London for the recovery of a
+debt should be stayed, and no manner of arrest or
+attachment allowed until further notice, unless the
+stranger suing were a denizen or a member of the
+Church.<a id="noteref_1579" name="noteref_1579" href="#note_1579"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1579</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Failure of efforts to effect a mutual restoration of goods seized.</span></div></div>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Spanish goods ordered to be sold.</span></div></div>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The respective claims of England and Spain referred to arbitration.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">By proclamation made the last day of June, 1570,
+English merchants who had suffered loss by Alva's
+proceedings were desired to make a return of such
+loss to the officers of one or other of the cities or
+towns of London, Southampton, Bristol, Chester,
+Newcastle, Hull or Ipswich, as they should find it
+most convenient,<a id="noteref_1580" name="noteref_1580" href="#note_1580"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1580</span></span></a> and on the 20th July following
+every Englishman into whose hands any goods
+belonging to Spanish subjects might have come was
+ordered to make a certificate under his hand and seal
+into the Court of the Admiralty, in the city of London,
+for her majesty to take further order thereon as
+should be thought meet.<a id="noteref_1581" name="noteref_1581" href="#note_1581"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1581</span></span></a> Negotiations, which had
+been renewed for mutual restitution, again broke
+down, for when the terms on which restitution was to
+be effected were to be reduced to writing, or, in
+the language of the record, "<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">put into mundum</span></span>,"<a id="noteref_1582" name="noteref_1582" href="#note_1582"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1582</span></span></a> the
+Spanish commissioners were found to have no<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page514">[pg 514]</span><a name="Pg514" id="Pg514" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+authority to arrange matters, whilst at the same time
+they wished to introduce clauses and conditions
+which Elizabeth could in no wise accept. Seeing
+that she was being played with, and knowing that
+much of the goods of English merchants seized in
+Spain and the Netherlands had already been sold, the
+queen determined to put up for sale the Spanish
+merchandise which for three years had been in
+English hands. Proclamation to this effect was made
+the 14th January, 1572.<a id="noteref_1583" name="noteref_1583" href="#note_1583"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1583</span></span></a> The queen showed every
+desire to treat the Spanish merchants with consideration.
+The sale was entrusted to Spanish
+subjects, who, upon their oath, were to make sale of
+all the ships, goods, wares and merchandise arrested,
+to the utmost advantage they could; and Spanish
+owners were allowed, either by themselves, their
+factor or attorney, freely to enter the realm within
+thirty days after the date of the proclamation to
+attend the sale, provided they made no attempt
+against her majesty or the peace of the country and
+departed immediately the sale was over. This
+proclamation, coupled with the hopelessness of Alva's
+case and the manifestation of discontent displayed by
+his own ruined merchants, led to articles being drawn
+up (25 Mar.) between Elizabeth and the King of
+Spain for an adjustment of their respective claims.
+Sir Thomas Gresham had previously (4 Feb.) been
+directed by letter from Lord Burghley and Sir Walter
+Mildmay to deliver up certain bonds of the Governor
+and Company of Merchant Adventurers to be cancelled
+now that the whole matter was to be referred to
+arbitration.<a id="noteref_1584" name="noteref_1584" href="#note_1584"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1584</span></span></a></p>
+
+<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page515">[pg 515]</span><a name="Pg515" id="Pg515" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc286" id="toc286"></a>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Insurrection of the Earls of Northumberland and Westmoreland, 1569.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">To add to the queen's difficulties, Mary, who had
+been deposed from the throne of Scotland and had
+sought shelter in England, was importuning her for
+assistance for the recovery of her lost crown. Whilst
+Elizabeth hesitated either to replace her rival in power
+or to set her at liberty, the Earls of Northumberland
+and Westmoreland endeavoured to carry out a scheme
+for marrying Mary to the Duke of Norfolk and forcing
+Elizabeth to acknowledge her as successor to the
+crown of England. The Duke of Norfolk obeyed
+the queen's summons to attend the court, and was
+committed to the Tower (Oct., 1569).<a id="noteref_1585" name="noteref_1585" href="#note_1585"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1585</span></span></a> The earls
+refused to obey the summons, and rose in insurrection.
+On the 24th November they were proclaimed traitors.<a id="noteref_1586" name="noteref_1586" href="#note_1586"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1586</span></span></a>
+Troops were sent against them, but they cowardly
+left their supporters to their own fate and fled to
+Scotland. The rebellion, fruitless as it proved to be,
+caused no little excitement in the city.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Measures taken for safe-guarding the city.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The same day that the earls were proclaimed
+traitors the Mayor of London issued his precept to
+the several aldermen, enjoining them to take steps
+for safe-guarding the city and taking into custody all
+rogues, masterless men and vagabonds.<a id="noteref_1587" name="noteref_1587" href="#note_1587"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1587</span></span></a> On the
+following day another precept was issued to the
+several livery companies for providing a certain
+number of soldiers, "well and sufficientlie furnyshed
+w<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="vertical-align: super">th</span></span> a jerkyn and a paire of gally sloppes of broad<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page516">[pg 516]</span><a name="Pg516" id="Pg516" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+clothe, collor watchet, one calyver w<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="vertical-align: super">th</span></span> flaske and
+tuchebox, a moryan, a sworde and a dagger."<a id="noteref_1588" name="noteref_1588" href="#note_1588"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1588</span></span></a>
+The soldiers were to be ready to serve her majesty
+at an hour's warning. The Chamberlain received
+orders to amend the several gates of the city and the
+portcullises belonging to them, as well as to repair
+the city's guns and put them in readiness, and lay in
+a stock of powder and shot to serve as occasion
+should require.<a id="noteref_1589" name="noteref_1589" href="#note_1589"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1589</span></span></a> By the 12th December all fear of
+immediate danger had passed away, and the livery
+companies were ordered to receive back the armour
+and weapons supplied to the soldiers and to keep
+them in their hall. The men were to be dismissed to
+their several industries, but still to hold themselves in
+readiness for service at an hour's warning if occasion
+should require them. A week later the soldiers were
+dismissed to their houses, those who had no house
+being allowed sixpence a day until called upon for
+active service.<a id="noteref_1590" name="noteref_1590" href="#note_1590"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1590</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Papal Bull of excommunication against Elizabeth, 1570.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Although the rising in the north had failed, the
+Catholics were not without hope. They were
+encouraged by the issue of a Papal Bull excommunicating
+Elizabeth and absolving her subjects from
+their allegiance. This Bull was affixed to the door of
+the Bishop of London's palace by a man named John
+Felton. The queen was alarmed. She believed that
+the long-threatened union against her of the Catholic
+powers had at length been effected. Felton was
+seized and tried at the Guildhall. He was found<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page517">[pg 517]</span><a name="Pg517" id="Pg517" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc287" id="toc287"></a>
+guilty, and paid the penalty of his rashness by being
+hanged, drawn and quartered.<a id="noteref_1591" name="noteref_1591" href="#note_1591"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1591</span></span></a> His exemplary
+punishment failed, however, to put a stop to Catholic
+intrigues against Elizabeth.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Rejoicing in the city after the battle of Lepanto, 7 Oct., 1571.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The defeat of the Turkish fleet at Lepanto by
+Don John of Austria (7 Oct., 1571) was commemorated
+two days later in London by a thanksgiving service
+at St. Paul's,<a id="noteref_1592" name="noteref_1592" href="#note_1592"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1592</span></span></a> which was attended by the mayor, Sir
+William Allen,<a id="noteref_1593" name="noteref_1593" href="#note_1593"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1593</span></span></a> the aldermen and members of the
+companies in their liveries. In the evening of the
+same day bonfires were lighted in the streets of the
+city by precept of the mayor.<a id="noteref_1594" name="noteref_1594" href="#note_1594"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1594</span></span></a> The immediate effect
+of the victory was the release of a large number of
+captives (variously estimated at 12,000 and 14,000)<a id="noteref_1595" name="noteref_1595" href="#note_1595"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1595</span></span></a>
+from Turkish slavery, for whose redemption the citizens
+were constantly being called upon to subscribe.<a id="noteref_1596" name="noteref_1596" href="#note_1596"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1596</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Peace and commercial prosperity, 1572.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Whilst the Low Countries were winning their
+way to freedom from the Spanish yoke, and France
+was suffering the horrors of Saint Bartholomew's
+day (24 Aug., 1572), England remained tranquil, and
+the city merchant had little cause to complain,
+except, it might be, on account of the number of
+strangers who rivalled him in his business.<a id="noteref_1597" name="noteref_1597" href="#note_1597"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1597</span></span></a> For the<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page518">[pg 518]</span><a name="Pg518" id="Pg518" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+better preservation of peace members of the French
+and the Dutch churches were ordered (28 Sept.) not
+to leave their houses after 9 o'clock at night.<a id="noteref_1598" name="noteref_1598" href="#note_1598"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1598</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The shifting policy of Elizabeth towards Spain and France, 1572-1574.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">So long as the Spanish king turned a deaf ear to
+the exhortations of the Pope, and refused to make a
+descent upon England, Elizabeth was able to cope
+with Catholicism at home by peaceful measures. But
+the time was approaching when she could no longer
+refuse to give practical assistance to her struggling
+co-religionists on the continent. The Netherlands
+had for some time past been preparing for open revolt
+against the barbarous government of Alva. In 1572 a
+party seized Brill, and thus laid the foundation of the
+Dutch Republic. It wanted but the active adhesion of
+Elizabeth to enable the French to drive the Spaniards
+out of the country, but this the queen was as yet unwilling
+to give. Two years later (1574) she offered
+her services to effect an understanding between Spain
+and the Netherlands, but her mediation proved futile.
+Both in 1572 and 1574 there are signs of military
+preparations having taken place in the city. In the
+first mentioned year Elizabeth held a review of the
+city troops in Greenwich Park.<a id="noteref_1599" name="noteref_1599" href="#note_1599"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1599</span></span></a> In 1574 the city
+was called upon to furnish 400 soldiers for the queen's
+service, and steps were taken to allot to the livery
+companies their quota of men or money in view of
+future calls.<a id="noteref_1600" name="noteref_1600" href="#note_1600"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1600</span></span></a> A store of gunpowder was also laid up.<a id="noteref_1601" name="noteref_1601" href="#note_1601"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1601</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Piracy rampant, 1575-1576.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">If one thing more than another was calculated
+to precipitate a rupture between England and Spain it<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page519">[pg 519]</span><a name="Pg519" id="Pg519" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc288" id="toc288"></a>
+was the action of English seamen, who roved the seas
+and indirectly rendered assistance to the Netherlanders
+by plundering Spanish vessels, in spite of all
+proclamations to the contrary.<a id="noteref_1602" name="noteref_1602" href="#note_1602"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1602</span></span></a> The Londoner was
+not behind-hand in this predatory warfare.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">A loan of£30,000, June, 1575.</span></div></div>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">A city Chamberlain dismissed from office.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">In June, 1575, the queen borrowed a sum of
+£30,000 from the citizens on security.<a id="noteref_1603" name="noteref_1603" href="#note_1603"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1603</span></span></a> The money
+was subscribed by the wealthier class of citizens, and
+a moiety of the loan was repaid in little more than a
+twelvemonth.<a id="noteref_1604" name="noteref_1604" href="#note_1604"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1604</span></span></a> Whatever may have been her faults,
+Elizabeth honestly paid her debts, and when she discovered
+in 1577 that money which she had repaid to
+certain officials had not reached the hands of the
+original creditor, she forthwith issued a proclamation
+commanding all such creditors to send in their claims
+in writing to the chief officer of her majesty's household.<a id="noteref_1605" name="noteref_1605" href="#note_1605"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1605</span></span></a>
+It is difficult to dissociate altogether this proclamation
+from the removal of George Heton from
+the office of Chamberlain of the City three months
+afterwards.<a id="noteref_1606" name="noteref_1606" href="#note_1606"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1606</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The city called upon to furnish soldiers, 1578.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">In February, 1578, the City was called upon to
+provide 2,000 arquebusiers. Refusal was useless,
+although an attempt was made to get the number
+reduced to 500. The mayor had scarcely issued his
+precept to the aldermen to raise the men before he
+received another order for 2,000 to be trained as
+directed in handling and using their weapons and kept<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page520">[pg 520]</span><a name="Pg520" id="Pg520" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+in readiness for future service.<a id="noteref_1607" name="noteref_1607" href="#note_1607"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1607</span></span></a> One hundred and fifty
+men were ordered (12 June) to be ready at an hour's
+notice for foreign service.<a id="noteref_1608" name="noteref_1608" href="#note_1608"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1608</span></span></a> Strangers and foreigners
+were not exempt.<a id="noteref_1609" name="noteref_1609" href="#note_1609"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1609</span></span></a> Some of the city companies were
+slow in paying their quota of expenses of fitting out
+the men, and pressure had to be brought to bear on
+them by the Court of Aldermen.<a id="noteref_1610" name="noteref_1610" href="#note_1610"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1610</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Count Casimir at Gresham House, Jan., 1579.</span></div></div>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Death of Sir Thomas Gresham, 21 Nov., 1579.</span></div></div>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Count Casimir presented by the city with a gift of 500 marks.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">In the following year Casimir, Count Palatine
+of the Rhine, paid a visit to England to answer a
+charge brought against him by the English envoy in
+Holland, of having used forces against the Netherlanders
+which had been despatched from these shores
+for their support. On the evening of Thursday, the
+22nd January, 1579, the Count landed at the Tower,
+where he was received by a party of noblemen and
+others, among whom we may conjecture was the
+Mayor of London and representatives of the city.<a id="noteref_1611" name="noteref_1611" href="#note_1611"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1611</span></span></a>
+Thence he was conducted by the light of cressets to
+Gresham's house, in Bishopsgate Street, where he was
+received with music and lodged and feasted by the
+worthy owner for three days. The honour thus
+shown to Gresham is only one more proof of the
+esteem and respect in which he was universally held
+by all parties, and, "in truth," as his biographer
+justly remarks,<a id="noteref_1612" name="noteref_1612" href="#note_1612"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1612</span></span></a> "his great experience, his long and<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page521">[pg 521]</span><a name="Pg521" id="Pg521" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc289" id="toc289"></a>
+familiar intercourse with men of all grades and professions,
+from princes and nobles—with whom ...
+he was on as intimate a footing as the impassable
+barrier of rank will permit—to the lowliest of his
+own dependants, the knowledge of men and manners
+which he must have derived from foreign travel, and
+his acquaintance with all the languages of civilised
+Europe, must have rendered him, towards the close
+of his life especially, as favourable a specimen as
+could have been selected of the English gentleman
+of that day." Casimir's reception was one of the
+last acts of public service performed by Gresham, for
+before the close of the year he had died (21 Nov.).
+On Sunday (25 Jan.) the Count was conducted to
+Westminster for an interview with the queen, after
+which lodgings were assigned to him in Somerset
+House. The court of Common Council had already
+(23 Jan.) voted "Duke Cassimerus" a gratification
+"in moneye or anye other thinge" to the value of
+500 marks.<a id="noteref_1613" name="noteref_1613" href="#note_1613"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1613</span></span></a> His visit was one round of feasting,
+hunting and sight-seeing; one day dining with the
+lord mayor, another with the merchants of the
+Steelyard; one day hunting at Hampton Court, and
+another day witnessing athletic sports at Westminster.
+That the Count succeeded in clearing his character
+may be surmised from the fact of his receiving the
+Order of the Garter before his departure.<a id="noteref_1614" name="noteref_1614" href="#note_1614"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1614</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The plague in the city, 1580-1583.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">In the following year the plague, which had been
+very virulent towards the end of 1577, and from which
+the city was seldom entirely free, appeared at Rye
+(June, 1580). A twelvemonth later it was raging in<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page522">[pg 522]</span><a name="Pg522" id="Pg522" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+London, but as the weather grew colder its virulence
+abated, allowing of the resumption of the lord mayor's
+feast. The respite was short. In the spring of 1582
+it was again rife in the city, increasing in fatality
+during the hot season and continuing until the winter
+of 1583.<a id="noteref_1615" name="noteref_1615" href="#note_1615"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1615</span></span></a> Business was often at a standstill, the law
+courts had to be removed to the country, and the
+sittings of the London Husting suspended.<a id="noteref_1616" name="noteref_1616" href="#note_1616"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1616</span></span></a></p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">St. Paul's Churchyard, which served as the burial
+ground to no less than twenty-three city parishes,
+became overcrowded and greatly added to the insanitary
+condition of the city by its shallow graves.
+The mayor informed the lords of the council of this
+state of affairs by letter (15 May, 1582), in which he
+says that scarcely any grave was then made without
+exposing corpses, and that the heat of the crowds
+standing over the shallow graves caused noxious exhalations.
+It was currently reported at the time that
+the gravediggers were the cause of the shallow graves
+"as being desirous to have the infection spred that
+they might gaine by burieng."<a id="noteref_1617" name="noteref_1617" href="#note_1617"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1617</span></span></a></p>
+</div>
+</div>
+
+<hr class="doublepage" /><div class="tei tei-div" style="margin-bottom: 5.00em; margin-top: 5.00em">
+<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page523">[pg 523]</span><a name="Pg523" id="Pg523" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+<a name="toc290" id="toc290"></a>
+<a name="pdf291" id="pdf291"></a>
+<h1 class="tei tei-head" style="text-align: left; margin-bottom: 3.46em; margin-top: 3.46em"><span style="font-size: 173%">CHAPTER XVIII.</span></h1>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-div" style="margin-bottom: 4.00em; margin-top: 4.00em">
+<a name="toc292" id="toc292"></a><h2 class="tei tei-head" style="text-align: left; margin-bottom: 2.88em; margin-top: 2.88em"></h2>
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Preparations for war.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The time was fast approaching when the queen
+would find herself unable any longer to maintain her
+frequent cry to the council board, "No war, my lords,
+no war!" and she began to concert measures to
+frustrate any attempt that might be made to attack
+her crown and realm by the subtle device of the
+Pope's emissaries or the more open hostility of
+Philip.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Troubles in Ireland, 1579-1583.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">There were two ways in which the Pope and
+Spain could attack England, the one by making a
+descent upon the coast, the other by undermining
+the loyalty of the queen's subjects by the aid of missionaries.
+A descent upon the English coast was, for
+the present at least, out of the question, but it was
+possible to wound England by fostering insurrection
+in Ireland. Accordingly, in 1579, a large force landed
+at Limerick under the authority of the Pope. It
+was, however, overpowered and destroyed by Lord
+Grey, the lord deputy.<a id="noteref_1618" name="noteref_1618" href="#note_1618"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1618</span></span></a></p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Then followed the rebellion under the Earl of
+Desmond, who six years before had regained his
+liberty on a promise to use his influence to destroy
+the Catholic religion in Ireland.<a id="noteref_1619" name="noteref_1619" href="#note_1619"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1619</span></span></a> Throughout the<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page524">[pg 524]</span><a name="Pg524" id="Pg524" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+Desmond rebellion the Londoners were constantly
+being called upon to furnish men and munition of
+war. The trouble was protracted by the landing of
+a force of 800 men from Spain, with the connivance,
+if not with the authority, of Philip. When the
+rebellion was suppressed distress drove many Irish to
+England, and the city became their chief refuge.<a id="noteref_1620" name="noteref_1620" href="#note_1620"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1620</span></span></a> A
+special day was appointed for apprehending "all
+suche rogishe and begging Ireishe people as well
+men weomen as children" as should be found
+wandering abroad in the city,<a id="noteref_1621" name="noteref_1621" href="#note_1621"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1621</span></span></a> and steps were taken
+subsequently to convey all Irish beggars to Bristol
+with the view of sending them back to their native
+land.<a id="noteref_1622" name="noteref_1622" href="#note_1622"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1622</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The Jesuits in the city, 1580-1581.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Whilst appealing to force to accomplish their
+object in Ireland, the Catholics resorted to intrigue to
+gain the same object in England and Scotland. For
+some years past there had been a steady flow from
+the continent of seminary priests, who worked silently
+and secretly making converts to the old religion.
+Every precaution was taken to prevent their inculcating
+their dangerous opinions into the minds of the
+inhabitants of the city and drawing them off from
+their allegiance to the queen and to the established
+Church. The aldermen were instructed to make
+return of those in their ward who refused to attend<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page525">[pg 525]</span><a name="Pg525" id="Pg525" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc293" id="toc293"></a>
+church. This was in 1568.<a id="noteref_1623" name="noteref_1623" href="#note_1623"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1623</span></span></a> In 1574 all strangers
+who had crept into the city under colour of religion
+and were found to be of no church were ordered to
+leave.<a id="noteref_1624" name="noteref_1624" href="#note_1624"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1624</span></span></a> In the following year (9 June, 1575) every
+stranger was called upon to subscribe the Articles of
+religion before he was allowed to take up his residence
+within the city, and those who refused to subscribe
+or to attend church were to give bond for their
+appearance before her Majesty's Commissioners for
+Ecclesiastical Causes to answer such matters as should
+be objected against them.<a id="noteref_1625" name="noteref_1625" href="#note_1625"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1625</span></span></a> The aldermen were
+instructed to make diligent search in their several
+wards for such as held conventicles under colour of
+religion and inter-meddled with matters of State and
+civil governance.<a id="noteref_1626" name="noteref_1626" href="#note_1626"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1626</span></span></a> In 1580 a regular Jesuit mission,
+under two priests, Campion and Parsons, was despatched
+to England as part of an organised Catholic
+scheme. Campion had at one time been a fellow
+of St. John's College, Oxford. Their first step was
+to remove a difficulty under which devout Catholics
+had laboured ever since the issue of the Bull of
+excommunication against Elizabeth in 1571. That
+Bull had reduced them to the necessity of choosing
+between disobedience to the Church and treason to
+the queen. The new missionaries helped them out
+of the dilemma by explaining that the censures of the
+Church only applied to heretics; Catholics might
+feign allegiance and the Church would say nothing.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The Recusancy Laws, 1581.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Under these circumstances it can scarcely be
+wondered at that the government proceeded to strong<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page526">[pg 526]</span><a name="Pg526" id="Pg526" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+measures—A proclamation was issued requiring
+English parents to remove their children from foreign
+seminaries, and declaring that to harbour Jesuit priests
+was to harbour rebels;<a id="noteref_1627" name="noteref_1627" href="#note_1627"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1627</span></span></a> whilst parliament imposed
+fines upon all who refused to attend the service of
+the established Church, in addition to the penalties
+imposed in 1571 upon those who claimed to absolve
+subjects from their allegiance and to receive them into
+the Church of Rome. In the city a strict watch was
+again ordered to be kept on all those who failed to
+attend regularly their parish church.<a id="noteref_1628" name="noteref_1628" href="#note_1628"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1628</span></span></a> It was further
+proposed to appoint special preachers to counteract
+the baneful influence of the Jesuit priest, and the
+Bishop of London was ordered to make a list of the
+best preachers and to appoint them districts.<a id="noteref_1629" name="noteref_1629" href="#note_1629"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1629</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Special preachers appointed for the city, 1581-1582.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">These instructions Bishop Aylmer forwarded to
+the lord mayor with a request for a contribution to
+enable him and his associates, the dean of St. Paul's
+and the dean of Windsor, to carry them into effect.
+The mayor replied (6 Sept., 1581) that, as for himself,
+his office was already so burdensome, both in work
+and expense, that it would go hard with him if
+he was called upon to pay more than any other
+parishioner in a Church matter. Both he and his
+brethren the aldermen were no less desirous than others
+to promote the knowledge of true religion and to inculcate
+obedience to the queen by lectures in the city,
+but the commons would have to be consulted first. He
+enclosed a list of lectures already established in the
+several parishes, and drew attention to the great
+yearly charge incurred by the companies and private<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page527">[pg 527]</span><a name="Pg527" id="Pg527" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc294" id="toc294"></a>
+persons in the city in maintaining students at the
+universities to serve the Church in the office of
+preaching and reading.<a id="noteref_1630" name="noteref_1630" href="#note_1630"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1630</span></span></a> This expense, the mayor
+said, warranted the City and the Companies asking
+to be no further burdened. The writer concluded
+by intimating that, however willing the corporation
+might be to assist in the good work, its ability to
+do so had been much diminished by the indiscreet
+demeanour of the bishop's own chaplain, Mr. Dyos,
+who had recently defamed the citizens in a public
+sermon at Paul's Cross, "as favorers of userers, of the
+familye of love and puritanes," saying "that if the
+appointing of preachers were committed to us we
+wold appointe preachers such as should defend
+usirie, the familie of love and puritanisme as they
+call it." The City was liable to make mistakes, just
+as the bishop himself had made a mistake in appointing
+so indiscreet a person for his chaplain, but in other
+respects they had no cause to reproach themselves
+in the matter of appointments. In conclusion they
+desired his lordship to take order for the reparation
+of their good fame.</p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Hitherto the City had received no direct communications
+from the Privy Council on the subject,
+but three days after the date of the lord mayor's
+letter to the Bishop of London the lords of the
+council made a direct appeal to the mayor and
+aldermen suggesting that a collection should be
+made among the clergy and other inhabitants of
+the city in order to "oppose the supersticion of<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page528">[pg 528]</span><a name="Pg528" id="Pg528" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+popery w<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="vertical-align: super">ch</span></span> by the coming over of divers Jesuits
+and seminarie preistes hath ben of late much increased."<a id="noteref_1631" name="noteref_1631" href="#note_1631"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1631</span></span></a>
+Little appears to have been done in the
+matter by the civic authorities until the beginning of
+the next year, when the first step was taken by the
+appointment of a committee (25 Jan., 1582).<a id="noteref_1632" name="noteref_1632" href="#note_1632"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1632</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Arrest and execution of Campion.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Campion meanwhile had been arrested and subjected
+to cruel torture. He was eventually executed.
+Parsons, his companion, escaped to the continent, where
+he continued to carry on an intrigue against the life
+of Elizabeth in conjunction with Allen, who some
+years before had established the famous seminary at
+Donay for the purpose of keeping up a supply of
+Jesuit priests for England.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Breach with Spain, Jan., 1584.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">In 1583—soon after Edward Osborne<a id="noteref_1633" name="noteref_1633" href="#note_1633"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1633</span></span></a> had been
+elected to the mayoralty—a conspiracy, which had
+long been on foot, for the assassination of Elizabeth
+and the invasion of England by a French army was
+discovered. Matters began to look serious, and it
+behoved the queen to dismiss the Spanish ambassador<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page529">[pg 529]</span><a name="Pg529" id="Pg529" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc295" id="toc295"></a>
+from England (Jan., 1584) and to see to her forces.
+Lord Burghley drew up "a memoryall of dyvers
+thynges nesessary to be thought of and to be put
+in execution for this sommer for y<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="vertical-align: super">e</span></span> strength of
+y<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="vertical-align: super">e</span></span> realme to serve for martiall defence ageynst ether
+rebellion or invasion,"<a id="noteref_1634" name="noteref_1634" href="#note_1634"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1634</span></span></a> containing suggestions for
+holding musters and training soldiers. The navy was
+got ready for sea.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Muster of 4,000 men in Greenwich Park, 1584.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">In April (1584) the City received orders to muster
+4,000 men and to revive the military shows on the
+eve of the Feasts of St. John the Baptist and St. Peter
+the Apostle as accustomed to be held in the days of
+Henry VIII. These displays had gradually fallen into
+desuetude; it was now the queen's policy to renew
+them.<a id="noteref_1635" name="noteref_1635" href="#note_1635"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1635</span></span></a> The citizens showed themselves equal to the
+emergency, and "mustered and skirmished" daily at
+Mile End and St. George's Field, so that in little more
+than a month they were in a fit state of discipline and
+training to appear in Greenwich Park before the queen
+herself, who thanked them graciously for their energy
+and pains, and declared that she had no subjects more
+ready to suppress disloyalty and to defend her person.<a id="noteref_1636" name="noteref_1636" href="#note_1636"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1636</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Assassination of Prince of Orange, 10 July, 1584.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">In July news arrived of the assassination of the
+Prince of Orange (10 July). Englishmen well knew
+that those who plotted against his life were plotting
+also against the life of their queen, and with wonderful
+unanimity—Catholics and Protestants alike—they<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page530">[pg 530]</span><a name="Pg530" id="Pg530" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+joined in a "Bond of Association" for the defence of
+her majesty's person. The terms of the association
+were afterwards embodied in a bill and submitted to
+parliament, specially summoned for the purpose.<a id="noteref_1637" name="noteref_1637" href="#note_1637"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1637</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Dutch envoys to Elizabeth, June, 1585.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Staggered by the sudden loss of their beloved
+leader, the Netherlanders despatched envoys the
+following year (1585) to England offering to acknowledge
+Elizabeth as their sovereign. Upon their
+arrival in London the envoys were lodged and
+hospitably entertained—although not at the City's
+expense—in Clothworkers' Hall,<a id="noteref_1638" name="noteref_1638" href="#note_1638"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1638</span></span></a> and on the 29th
+June were received in audience by the queen at
+Greenwich. After much hesitation, as was her wont,
+she at last consented to take the Netherlands under
+her protection and to despatch troops to their assistance,
+but only on condition that the States gave
+security for expenses to be incurred.<a id="noteref_1639" name="noteref_1639" href="#note_1639"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1639</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Recruits for service in the Low Countries, July, 1585.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">On the 9th July the mayor, Sir Thomas Pullison,<a id="noteref_1640" name="noteref_1640" href="#note_1640"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1640</span></span></a>
+issued his precept to the aldermen for each to make
+a survey in his ward of all such persons as were suitable
+and willing for service in the Low Countries,
+where it was intended they should have good
+allowance.<a id="noteref_1641" name="noteref_1641" href="#note_1641"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1641</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The fall of Antwerp and despatch of Leicester to the Low Countries, 1585.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Every effort was made to save Antwerp, but it
+was too late. By chaffering and bargaining with the
+envoys Elizabeth had lost her opportunity and
+Antwerp fell (19 Aug.). She could be resolute at<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page531">[pg 531]</span><a name="Pg531" id="Pg531" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc296" id="toc296"></a>
+times, but it wanted much to rouse her into activity.
+The news of Antwerp's fall administered to her the
+necessary incitement to deal "roundly and resolutely"
+with her new allies. Fresh forces were despatched
+to Flanders under the Earl of Leicester, making in
+all some 10,000 men that had already been sent
+thither, nearly one-fourth of which had been furnished
+by the city of London.<a id="noteref_1642" name="noteref_1642" href="#note_1642"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1642</span></span></a> The queen grumbled at
+having to send so many—"I have sent a fine heap
+of folk thither, in all ... not under 10,000
+soldiers of the English nation," said she to the
+envoys in October<a id="noteref_1643" name="noteref_1643" href="#note_1643"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1643</span></span></a>—and she kept the earl so short
+of money that he had to mortgage his estate.<a id="noteref_1644" name="noteref_1644" href="#note_1644"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1644</span></span></a> The
+City did what it could and made him a present of
+£500 in "newe angells," but the City itself was in
+pecuniary difficulties and was compelled to borrow or
+"take up" money to defend its title to its own
+lands,<a id="noteref_1645" name="noteref_1645" href="#note_1645"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1645</span></span></a> which had been in constant jeopardy ever
+since the appointment of the royal commission to
+search for "concealed lands" in 1567.<a id="noteref_1646" name="noteref_1646" href="#note_1646"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1646</span></span></a></p>
+
+<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page532">[pg 532]</span><a name="Pg532" id="Pg532" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The city flooded with strangers from France and Flanders.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The direct effect of the fall of Antwerp upon
+the city of London was to flood its streets more
+than ever with strangers, and on the 30th October,
+1585, the mayor was once more called upon by the
+lords of the Privy Council to make a return of the
+number of strangers within the city, and more
+especially of the number of French and Flemish
+strangers that had arrived "sithens the beginninge of
+the presente trobles moved by the house of Guise
+in Fraunce and the rendringe of the towne of
+Andwerpe."<a id="noteref_1647" name="noteref_1647" href="#note_1647"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1647</span></span></a> In April and May of the following
+year (1586) the year of the disastrous battle at
+Zutphen and of the death of the <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Chevalier sans peur
+et sans reproche</span></span>, Sir Philip Sidney—another call was
+made in the city for volunteers for service in the
+Low Countries,<a id="noteref_1648" name="noteref_1648" href="#note_1648"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1648</span></span></a> and the civic companies were
+ordered to lay in a stock of gunpowder to be ready
+"uppon eny ymminent occacioun."<a id="noteref_1649" name="noteref_1649" href="#note_1649"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1649</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Discovery of the Babington plot, Aug., 1586.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Whilst operations, more or less active, were
+being carried on in the Netherlands against Spain, a
+new Catholic conspiracy against the life of Elizabeth,
+with Anthony Babington at its head, was discovered
+by Walsingham. The delight of the citizens
+at the queen's escape drew forth from her a letter
+which she desired to be read before the Common
+Council, and in which she testified her appreciation
+of their loyalty. The letter was introduced to the
+council by some prefatory remarks made by James
+Dalton, a member of the court, in which he expatiated
+upon the beauties of the reformed Church<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page533">[pg 533]</span><a name="Pg533" id="Pg533" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc297" id="toc297"></a>
+as contrasted with the Roman religion.<a id="noteref_1650" name="noteref_1650" href="#note_1650"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1650</span></span></a> The discovery
+of the plot led to stringent measures being taken
+against suspected persons in the city, and returns
+were ordered to be made setting forth for each ward:
+(1) the names of the ablest men for service, (2) the
+names of those past service, (3) the names of all who
+were suspected as to religion, and (4) the names of
+all strangers born.<a id="noteref_1651" name="noteref_1651" href="#note_1651"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1651</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Execution of Mary Stuart, 8 Feb., 1587.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The discovery had also another effect: it
+brought the head of Mary Stuart to the block. A
+commission of peers sitting at Fotheringhay found
+that the conspiracy had been "with the privitie of
+the said Marie pretending tytle to the crowne of the
+realme of England," and it only remained for
+Elizabeth to sign the warrant for her execution to
+remove for ever a dangerous rival. This, however,
+the queen long hesitated to do, and when at length
+prevailed upon she caused public proclamation to be
+made of the reasons which induced her to take the
+extreme course.<a id="noteref_1652" name="noteref_1652" href="#note_1652"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1652</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">A threatened famine in the city, Nov., 1586</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">To add to the general gloom, England was
+threatened before the close of the year (1586) with a
+famine, caused partly by the inclemency of the
+seasons and partly by a "corner" in wheat, which
+some enterprising engrossers had managed to bring
+about.<a id="noteref_1653" name="noteref_1653" href="#note_1653"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1653</span></span></a> In November the mayor caused the city
+companies to lay in 6,000 or 7,000 quarters of wheat
+and rye for the relief of those who had already<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page534">[pg 534]</span><a name="Pg534" id="Pg534" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+suffered from the extreme dearth, and to raise a sum
+of £2,500 over and above such sums as they had
+hitherto disbursed for the provision of corn and
+grain,<a id="noteref_1654" name="noteref_1654" href="#note_1654"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1654</span></span></a> and the Court of Aldermen (3 Jan., 1587)
+agreed to erect a new garner at the Bridgehouse.<a id="noteref_1655" name="noteref_1655" href="#note_1655"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1655</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Philip's preparations for invasion, 1587.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">After the execution of Mary Stuart, Philip of
+Spain laid claim to the crown of England. For years
+past he was known to have been preparing a fleet for
+an invasion of the country. Preparations were now
+almost complete, and in 1587 expectation was that
+the fleet might be seen any day bearing down
+upon the English coast. The inhabitants of villages
+and towns on the south coast forsook their homes in
+terror of the invasion and sought shelter inland.<a id="noteref_1656" name="noteref_1656" href="#note_1656"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1656</span></span></a>
+The evil hour was put off by the prompt action of
+Drake, who, with four ships of the royal navy and
+twenty-four others supplied by the City and private
+individuals,<a id="noteref_1657" name="noteref_1657" href="#note_1657"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1657</span></span></a> appeared suddenly off the Spanish coast,
+and running into Cadiz and Lisbon, destroyed tons
+of shipping under the very nose of the Spanish lord
+high admiral, and threw into the sea the vast military
+stores that had been accumulated there. Having
+thus accomplished the object for which he set sail—that
+of "singeing the king of Spain's beard"—he
+returned, and the sailing of the Armada was put off
+for a year.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Preparations in England, 1587-1588.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Preparations were in the meanwhile pushed on
+in the city to meet the attack whenever it should be
+made. Ten thousand men were levied and equipped
+in a short space of time.<a id="noteref_1658" name="noteref_1658" href="#note_1658"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1658</span></span></a> Any inhabitant of the city<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page535">[pg 535]</span><a name="Pg535" id="Pg535" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc298" id="toc298"></a>
+assessed in the subsidy-book at £50 in goods, and
+who, being under fifty years of age, was called upon
+to serve, and refused, was forthwith committed to
+Newgate.<a id="noteref_1659" name="noteref_1659" href="#note_1659"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1659</span></span></a> If any fault was to be found with the
+city's force it was the inefficiency of its officers,
+whom the municipal authorities always claimed to
+appoint. The Earl of Leicester, who was in command
+of the camp which had been formed at Tilbury, held
+but a poor opinion of Londoners as a fighting force.<a id="noteref_1660" name="noteref_1660" href="#note_1660"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1660</span></span></a>
+"For your Londoners," wrote the earl to Walsingham,<a id="noteref_1661" name="noteref_1661" href="#note_1661"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1661</span></span></a>
+I see their service will be little, except they have
+their own captains, and having them, I look for
+none at all by them when we shall meet the
+enemy." He declares that he knows what burghers
+be well enough, even though they be "as brave and
+well trained" as the Londoners; they would be
+useless without good leaders,<a id="noteref_1662" name="noteref_1662" href="#note_1662"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1662</span></span></a> and on this he had
+always insisted. He warns Walsingham against yielding
+to the wishes of "townsmen" at such a critical
+juncture, for they would look for the like concession
+at other times. The Londoners were not peculiar
+in their desire to have their own officers, according
+to the earl's own showing, for the letter continues:—"You
+and my lords all know the imperfection<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page536">[pg 536]</span><a name="Pg536" id="Pg536" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+at this time, how few leaders you have, and the
+gentlemen of the counties here are likewise very
+loth to have any placed with them to command
+under them, but well pleased to have some expert
+man with them to give them advice." Two years
+later a code of regulations for the "trayninge of
+capytaynes" was forwarded by the government to
+the city, and there put into execution.<a id="noteref_1663" name="noteref_1663" href="#note_1663"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1663</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The City fits out sixteen ships and four pinnaces.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">In addition to the land force the City agreed
+(3 April, 1588) to furnish and fully equip for war
+sixteen of the largest and best merchant ships that
+could be found in the Thames, and four pinnaces to
+attend on them.<a id="noteref_1664" name="noteref_1664" href="#note_1664"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1664</span></span></a> A committee was nominated to sit
+at Clothworkers' Hall and take the necessary steps for
+fitting out the vessels, the cost of which was to be
+met by an assessment on citizen and stranger alike.<a id="noteref_1665" name="noteref_1665" href="#note_1665"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1665</span></span></a>
+Nothing was said at the time about victualling the
+fleet, but we learn from a later entry in the City's
+Journal that they were victualled for three months.
+On the 16th July the City agreed to supply victuals<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page537">[pg 537]</span><a name="Pg537" id="Pg537" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc299" id="toc299"></a>
+for "those twentie shipps lately sett forth" for one
+month longer, and on the 10th August the Common
+Council again passed a similar resolution.<a id="noteref_1666" name="noteref_1666" href="#note_1666"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1666</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The fate of the Armada, July, 1588.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">At last the blow fell. On Friday, the 19th (o.s.)
+July, the Armada was sighted off the Lizard. A
+strong wind from the south-west was blowing at the
+time, and it was thought advisable to let the fleet
+pass and to follow it up with the English vessels
+then lying in Plymouth harbour. On the following
+day the two fleets hove in sight of each other.
+According to the report made to Walsingham by
+Richard Tomson—a Londoner serving on board the
+<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Margaret and John</span></span>, one of the ships furnished by the
+City—the Spanish fleet numbered at that time 136
+sail, ninety of which were large vessels, whilst the
+English fleet numbered no more than sixty-seven.<a id="noteref_1667" name="noteref_1667" href="#note_1667"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1667</span></span></a></p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Notwithstanding the great superiority of the
+enemy's fleet in numbers and tonnage, the English
+admiral, Lord Howard, opened fire the next morning,
+but took care not to come to close quarters. "We
+had some small fight with them that Sunday
+afternoon," reported Hawkins to Walsingham.<a id="noteref_1668" name="noteref_1668" href="#note_1668"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1668</span></span></a>
+The admiral had other reasons for preserving caution.
+His ships were but ill-furnished with provisions and
+with ammunition, and even thus early he had to beg
+the Secretary of State to send him "for God's sake
+some powder and shot."<a id="noteref_1669" name="noteref_1669" href="#note_1669"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1669</span></span></a> The same deficiency of
+ammunition was experienced the whole time that<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page538">[pg 538]</span><a name="Pg538" id="Pg538" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+the two fleets were opposed to each other, and but
+for this the enemy would not have got off so cheaply
+as it did. Scarcely a day passed without some
+cannonading taking place, but never a general engagement.
+The English trusted to their superior
+seamanship and to the greater activity of their own
+light vessels compared with the heavier and more
+unwieldly Spanish galleons. Again and again they
+poured broadside after broadside into the enemy, but
+always making good their retreat before the Spanish
+vessels could turn in pursuit. On Tuesday (23 July),
+wrote Hawkins, they had "a sharp and long fight" off
+Portland, on Thursday "a hot fraye." And thus the
+Armada made its way up channel, pestered with the
+swarm of English vessels that would never leave it at
+peace. On the Saturday following (27 July) it finally
+dropped anchor in Calais roads, with the intention of
+awaiting there the arrival of Alexander Farnese with
+his promised aid before making a direct descent upon
+the English coast. Farnese did not arrive for the
+reason that he was blockaded by the Dutch fleet;
+but the English received an accession of strength by
+the arrival of Lord Henry Seymour with a squadron
+of sixteen ships, which hitherto had been lying off
+Folkestone.<a id="noteref_1670" name="noteref_1670" href="#note_1670"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1670</span></span></a></p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">At this juncture the lord mayor (Sir George
+Bond), having received information of the critical
+state of affairs and that a general engagement was
+imminent, issued his precept to the aldermen to
+summon the pastors and ministers of each ward, and
+bid them call their parishioners to church by toll of<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page539">[pg 539]</span><a name="Pg539" id="Pg539" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc300" id="toc300"></a>
+bell or otherwise, both in the morning and afternoon
+of this eventful Saturday, in order that humble and
+hearty prayers might be offered to Almighty God
+"by preaching and otherwise," as the necessity of the
+times required.<a id="noteref_1671" name="noteref_1671" href="#note_1671"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1671</span></span></a> Three days before (24 July) he had
+given orders for a strict watch and ward to be kept in
+the city, and for a goodly supply of leather buckets
+in case of fire.<a id="noteref_1672" name="noteref_1672" href="#note_1672"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1672</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Richard Tomson and the London ship </span><span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-size: 80%; font-style: italic">Margaret and John</span></span><span style="font-size: 80%">.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">After more than one consultation together, the
+English commanders determined to resort to stratagem.
+They sent for a number of useless hulks from Dover,
+and having filled them with every kind of combustible,
+sent them all aflame on Sunday night into the thick
+of the enemy. The result was a panic; cables were
+cut and frantic attempts made to escape what seemed
+imminent and wholesale destruction. The ships fell
+foul of each other; some were wrecked and others
+burnt. When Monday morning dawned only eighty-six
+vessels out of 124 that had anchored off Calais
+thirty-six hours before could be found, and these for
+the most part were seen driving towards the coast of
+Flanders. The English fleet at once prepared to
+follow in pursuit, but attention was for a time drawn
+off to the action of the flagship of the squadron
+of galeasses, a huge vessel which had become disabled
+by loss of rudder, and the crew of which
+were endeavouring by the aid of oars to bring
+into Calais harbour. The Lord Admiral Howard at
+once bore down upon her in the <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Ark</span></span>, but the water
+proved too shallow. The London ship <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Margaret
+and John</span></span> followed suit and, although of less tonnage
+than the <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Ark</span></span>, got aground. Richard Tomson sent<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page540">[pg 540]</span><a name="Pg540" id="Pg540" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+home a graphic account of the exploit that followed.<a id="noteref_1673" name="noteref_1673" href="#note_1673"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1673</span></span></a>
+Both ships sent out long boats to capture the rich prize
+as she lay stuck fast upon the harbour bar. Tomson
+himself formed one of the little band of volunteers. The
+boats were soon alongside the galeass, its huge sides
+towering high above them. There then ensued "a
+pretty skirmish for half-an-hour," wrote Tomson, "but
+they seemed safely ensconced in their ships, while we
+in our open pinnaces and far under them had nothing
+to shroud and cover us." Fortune at last favoured the
+attackers. The Spanish commander fell dead on his
+deck with a bullet through his head. A panic seized
+the sailors, most of whom jumped overboard and
+tried by swimming and wading to reach the shore.
+Some succeeded, but many were drowned; whilst
+those who remained on board signified their readiness
+to capitulate by hoisting a couple of "handkerchers"
+on rapiers. The English lost no time in clambering
+up the sides of the monster, and at once commenced
+plundering the vessel and releasing the galley slaves.
+They were only waiting for the tide to take their
+prize in tow and carry her off when they were warned
+by the governor of Calais against making any such
+attempt. They were free to plunder the vessel if
+they liked, but make prize of the vessel itself they
+must not, and this order the governor showed
+himself ready and able to enforce by opening fire
+from the fort. Tomson and his fellow volunteers
+were heartily disgusted at having after all to surrender
+their prize, "the verye glory and staye of the Spanish
+armye, a thing of very great value and strength."</p>
+
+<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page541">[pg 541]</span><a name="Pg541" id="Pg541" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The naval engagement off Gravelines 29 July, 1588.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">This exploit being ended and the long boats
+having returned to their respective ships, the lord
+admiral started in pursuit of the Spaniards. Seeing
+them coming up the Spanish commander immediately
+prepared for action. An engagement—described by
+Hawkins as "a long and great fight"—took place off
+Gravelines and lasted six hours. The English pursued
+the same tactics as before, and with like success.
+Without losing a single ship of their own they succeeded
+in riddling the best Spanish ships through and
+through, and at last the Armada was forced to bear
+away towards the open sea. The English followed
+and made a pretence of keeping up the attack, but by
+this time nearly all their ammunition as well as food
+had given out.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The Armada driven northward.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">From Tuesday (30 July) until the following
+Friday (2 Aug.) the pursuit was, nevertheless, maintained
+by Howard, Drake and Frobisher. On Sunday
+(4 Aug.) the strong south-wester which had prevailed
+rose to a gale, and the English fleet made its way
+home with difficulty. It was otherwise with the
+Armada. Crippled and forlorn, without pilots and
+without competent commander, the great fleet was
+driven northward past the Hebrides and eventually
+returned home in a decimated condition by the west
+coast of Ireland.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Preparations in the city for receiving sick and wounded, 29 July.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">In the meantime the civic authorities took order
+for receiving the sick and wounded and administering
+to their comfort. Two aldermen—Sir Thomas Pullison
+and Sir Wolstan Dixie—were deputed (29 July) by
+their brethren to ride abroad among the innholders,
+brewers, bakers and butchers of the city to see that
+they did not enhance the price of provisions and that<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page542">[pg 542]</span><a name="Pg542" id="Pg542" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+they well entertained all soldiers who arrived in the
+city.<a id="noteref_1674" name="noteref_1674" href="#note_1674"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1674</span></span></a> The City agreed, moreover, to re-victual the
+ships it had furnished and to provide them with
+munition and other requisites. A fresh tax was
+imposed for the purpose of "marine and land
+affairs."<a id="noteref_1675" name="noteref_1675" href="#note_1675"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1675</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Reports as to the fate of the Armada, July-Aug., 1588.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">It was a long time before any certain news
+arrived in the city of the ultimate fate of the Armada.
+There had been rumours abroad that the English fleet
+had been victorious—with so many Londoners serving
+in the fleet, it would have been strange indeed if their
+friends at home had been kept in absolute ignorance
+of what was taking place in the channel—and bonfires
+had been lighted, but these rumours were often incorrect
+and sometimes lead to mischief. The mayor
+therefore issued his precept to the aldermen on the
+30th July—the day after the engagement off Gravelines—bidding
+them see that the inhabitants of their
+several wards refrained from crediting any news that
+might be reported of the vessels at sea but what they
+received from the mayor himself. The precaution
+was necessary "for the avoyding of some dislike that
+may come thereof."<a id="noteref_1676" name="noteref_1676" href="#note_1676"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1676</span></span></a> On the 1st August, so critical
+were the times, the mayor issued a precept by the
+queen's orders forbidding householders to quit the
+city, that they might the better be ready for the
+queen's service if required.<a id="noteref_1677" name="noteref_1677" href="#note_1677"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1677</span></span></a> On the 4th the citizens
+were informed that if they had any friend or servant
+detained as prisoner in the Spanish dominion, or
+bound to the galleys, whom they wished to set free,<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page543">[pg 543]</span><a name="Pg543" id="Pg543" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc301" id="toc301"></a>
+they might have Spanish prisoners allotted to them
+to assist towards ransom.<a id="noteref_1678" name="noteref_1678" href="#note_1678"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1678</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The queen attends a public thanksgiving service at St. Paul's, 24 Nov., 1588.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The first public notification of the complete destruction
+of the Armada was made in a thanksgiving
+sermon preached by the Dean of St. Paul's on Tuesday,
+the 20th August, at Paul's Cross, in the presence
+of the mayor and aldermen and the livery companies
+in their best gowns.<a id="noteref_1679" name="noteref_1679" href="#note_1679"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1679</span></span></a> In November the queen resolved
+to attend a public thanksgiving service at St. Paul's in
+person, Monday, the 18th, being the day that was
+originally fixed. Great preparations were made for
+the occasion. The livery companies were ordered to
+take up their appointed stations at eight o'clock in the
+morning and to follow in the train of the royal
+procession until the "preaching place" was reached.
+Places were to be kept by a detachment of the
+"yeomanry" of each company sent on at six o'clock
+for that purpose. The "governors of the hospital"
+of each company were also to attend, staff in hand,
+and repair to the "skaffold" for them appointed.
+After dinner the companies were to return immediately
+to their stations and to wait there until her
+majesty returned to Somerset House.<a id="noteref_1680" name="noteref_1680" href="#note_1680"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1680</span></span></a> The day
+was afterwards changed from Monday, the 18th, to
+Sunday, the 24th, when the queen came in great
+state to St. Paul's. After prayers she took her
+seat in a closet built out of the north wall of the
+church and facing Paul's Cross, where she heard a
+sermon preached by the Bishop of Salisbury. That
+being over she was entertained at dinner in the<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page544">[pg 544]</span><a name="Pg544" id="Pg544" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+bishop's palace, and afterwards returned to Somerset
+House.<a id="noteref_1681" name="noteref_1681" href="#note_1681"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1681</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Monuments in city churches to Frobisher, Hawkins and Martin Bond.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Whilst the City is justly proud of its own share
+in the defence of the kingdom at this great crisis
+in the nation's history, it has not neglected to give
+honour where honour was most due. Of the great
+naval commanders the "sea dogs" of that age—the
+faces of at least two of them were familiar to the
+citizens. Both Frobisher and Hawkins owned property
+in the city, and in all probability resided there,
+like their fellow seaman and explorer, Sir Humphrey
+Gilbert, who was living in Red Cross Street, in
+the parish of St. Giles, Cripplegate, in 1583, the
+year that he met his death at sea.<a id="noteref_1682" name="noteref_1682" href="#note_1682"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1682</span></span></a> The same parish
+claims Frobisher, whose remains (excepting his entrails,
+which were interred at Plymouth, where he
+died) lie buried in St. Giles's Church, and to whom a
+mural monument was erected by the vestry in 1888,
+just three centuries after the defeat of the Armada, to
+which he had contributed so much. If Hawkins himself
+did not reside in the city, his widow had a mansion
+house in Mincing Lane.<a id="noteref_1683" name="noteref_1683" href="#note_1683"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1683</span></span></a> He, too, had probably
+lived there, for although he died and was buried at
+sea, a monument was erected to his memory and that
+of Katherine, his first wife, in the church of St.
+Dunstan-in-the-East.<a id="noteref_1684" name="noteref_1684" href="#note_1684"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1684</span></span></a> There is one other—a citizen
+of London and son of an alderman—whose name has<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page545">[pg 545]</span><a name="Pg545" id="Pg545" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc302" id="toc302"></a>
+been handed down as having taken an active part in
+the defence of the kingdom at this time, not at sea,
+but on land. A monument in the recently restored
+church of St. Helen, Bishopsgate, tells us that Martin
+Bond, son of Alderman William Bond, "was captaine
+in ye yeare 1588 at ye campe at Tilbury, and after
+remained chief captaine of ye trained bands of this
+citty until his death." The monument represents
+him as sitting in a tent guarded by two sentinels, with
+a page holding a horse.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Disorganized state of the camp at Tilbury.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">It was well that the Spaniards suffered defeat at
+sea, for had they been able to effect a landing they
+would have made short work with the half-trained
+and dissatisfied soldiers in the camp at Tilbury, and
+London would have been at their mercy. Even the
+presence of Elizabeth herself, riding on horseback
+through the camp, as she did on the 8th August, was
+but poor compensation to the soldiers for the want of
+victuals and wages. Many sold their armour and
+weapons to pay themselves as soon as the camp broke
+up. Citizens of London were warned by royal proclamation
+(20 Aug.)<a id="noteref_1685" name="noteref_1685" href="#note_1685"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1685</span></span></a> against purchasing armour and
+weapons offered by soldiers, who were declared to
+"have most falsly and slanderously given out that
+they weare compelled to make sale of them for
+that they receaved noe pay, which is most untruely
+reported." Any armour or weapons bought before
+publication of the proclamation was to be delivered
+up to the mayor with particulars as to the way the
+purchase had been effected and compensation would
+be allowed.</p>
+
+<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page546">[pg 546]</span><a name="Pg546" id="Pg546" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">City loans of £30,000 and £20,000, Sept.-Dec., 1588.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Notwithstanding the extreme parsimony with
+which Elizabeth had fitted out both army and navy,
+the cost of preparations to meet the attack of Spain
+had been great, and she was obliged to borrow money.
+In September (1588) the City advanced her the sum
+of £30,000, receiving her bond for repayment in the
+following March; and in the following December she
+borrowed a further sum of £20,000 to be repaid by
+the following April. Both sums were raised among
+the livery companies.<a id="noteref_1686" name="noteref_1686" href="#note_1686"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1686</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Expedition to Spain under Norris and Drake, April-July, 1589.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">In March of the following year (1589) parliament
+granted a liberal supply, but the grant was accompanied
+by a request that Elizabeth would no longer
+await the assaults of Spain, but carry the war into the
+enemy's country. This the queen declared her inability
+to undertake on the score of poverty. She
+promised, however, to give what assistance she could
+to any of her subjects who relished such enterprise.
+Norris and Drake were at hand, ready and willing
+to undertake the work on these terms. Already
+(in January) the City had been called upon to furnish
+them with 400 strong and able men.<a id="noteref_1687" name="noteref_1687" href="#note_1687"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1687</span></span></a> At the end of
+March 1,000 more were required, and each alderman
+was instructed to search in his ward for all able and
+masterless men and all other persons fit for service
+that were householders and not charged with families,
+and to bring them to the Leadenhall.<a id="noteref_1688" name="noteref_1688" href="#note_1688"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1688</span></span></a> With these
+and other forces the expedition set sail, but beyond
+storming Vigo and committing some damage at<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page547">[pg 547]</span><a name="Pg547" id="Pg547" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc303" id="toc303"></a>
+Corunna, it accomplished nothing and returned in
+July.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Disbanded soldiers and sailors in the city.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Again the city was threatened with danger and
+disease from the presence of disbanded soldiers and
+sailors, who were apt to carry their freebooting habits
+wherever they went, more especially when starvation
+stared them in the face. Sir Martin Calthorp did what
+he could to relieve them, paying out of his own pocket
+no less a sum than £100. His conduct was applauded
+by the lords of the council, who authorised him to
+raise a further sum towards assisting the soldiers to
+their homes in the country by allowing them a half-penny
+a mile.<a id="noteref_1689" name="noteref_1689" href="#note_1689"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1689</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Soldiers ordered to return to their own homes.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">A royal proclamation was subsequently (20 Aug.)
+issued promising payment of any money due to
+mariners who would make a written application to the
+Admiralty. Soldiers were to return to the country
+where they had been pressed and apply to the justices
+or other officers who pressed them, and who would
+make a certificate to the lieutenant of the county,
+when the soldiers would receive "reasonable contentment."<a id="noteref_1690" name="noteref_1690" href="#note_1690"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1690</span></span></a>
+This, however, failed entirely to remedy the
+evil.<a id="noteref_1691" name="noteref_1691" href="#note_1691"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1691</span></span></a> Four days before this proclamation precept had
+been issued to the aldermen for a good and substantial
+double watch to be kept throughout the night of the
+16th August until noon of the next day. There had
+been a report abroad of a large meeting of soldiers
+and sailors to take place as early as five o'clock on the
+morning of the 17th in the neighbourhood of Tower
+Hill.<a id="noteref_1692" name="noteref_1692" href="#note_1692"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1692</span></span></a></p>
+
+<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page548">[pg 548]</span><a name="Pg548" id="Pg548" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Elizabeth and Henry IV of France, 1589-1591.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The revolution which followed the assassination
+of the French king by Jaques Clements about this
+time (Aug., 1589) brought fresh anxiety to Elizabeth,
+who felt bound to support the Protestant Henry of
+Navarre with all the means at her command, as an
+indirect way of carrying on the war against Spain.
+Four thousand men were to be despatched for his
+assistance, 1,000 of whom the City was called upon
+to supply. As they were to be picked men the lords
+of the council ordered double the number, or 2,000 men,
+to be got ready, in order that expert officers might
+review them and select the number required.<a id="noteref_1693" name="noteref_1693" href="#note_1693"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1693</span></span></a>
+The demand was enforced by a letter from the
+queen herself, in which she drew attention to the
+necessity of assisting one whose preservation was of
+so much importance to England.<a id="noteref_1694" name="noteref_1694" href="#note_1694"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1694</span></span></a> The city's gates
+were at once closed by the mayor's orders to prevent
+the exodus of "lusty, strong, able and young men" to
+avoid service.<a id="noteref_1695" name="noteref_1695" href="#note_1695"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1695</span></span></a> Although Henry IV was materially
+assisted by the arrival of English troops, their operations
+were chiefly confined to Normandy.</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The City and the Earl of Essex, 1591.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">A further contingent of 400 men was shortly
+afterwards (22 June) demanded by the queen, 300
+of which were to be got ready at once. More care
+than usual was to be bestowed on their selection, as
+they were to be employed under the Earl of Essex,<a id="noteref_1696" name="noteref_1696" href="#note_1696"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1696</span></span></a>
+with whom the City happened at this time to be out
+of favour. What was the precise cause of the City's
+disgrace does not appear; we only know that the
+civic authorities were anxious to recover the good will
+of one so near the person of the sovereign, and to<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page549">[pg 549]</span><a name="Pg549" id="Pg549" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc304" id="toc304"></a>
+this end made him a "small present," thanking him
+for his past services, for the general defence of the
+realm, and of all Christian estates professing the
+Gospel and true religion of Almighty God, and
+assuring him that they were not so much presenting
+him with money, in sending him a gratuity, as with
+"the hart of the citie." They begged that if some
+private offence had been given to his lordship he
+would "wrappe it up" in this public testimony of
+their hearty good wills.<a id="noteref_1697" name="noteref_1697" href="#note_1697"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1697</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The City agrees to fit out six ships and a pinnace, 16 June, 1591.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">In the meantime the Common Council had, at
+the queen's request, agreed (16 June) to fit out six
+ships of war and one pinnace at a cost of £7,400, to
+be levied on the companies. This sum was afterwards
+raised to £8,000.<a id="noteref_1698" name="noteref_1698" href="#note_1698"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1698</span></span></a> Towards the close of the
+year (9 Nov.) the lord mayor and sheriffs were called
+upon to levy 200 able men to be "pioners." They
+were to be chosen out of the city of London and the
+county of Middlesex, and to be despatched to Dieppe
+for service under the Earl of Essex "a service
+vearie necessarie and we hope not of any long
+continuaunce,"<a id="noteref_1699" name="noteref_1699" href="#note_1699"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1699</span></span></a> wrote the queen. In addition to
+men, the queen wanted money; and the Common
+Council agreed (18 Sept.) to lend her £20,000 for
+three months, afterwards renewed for six months.<a id="noteref_1700" name="noteref_1700" href="#note_1700"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1700</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Search to be made for Spanish emissaries in disguise.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">In the meantime Spanish emissaries, disguised as
+soldiers, mariners, merchants, gentlemen with comely
+apparel, and even as "gallantes," decked out in<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page550">[pg 550]</span><a name="Pg550" id="Pg550" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+colours and feathers, had been doing the work of
+Philip silently but surely. Some had resorted to the
+Universities; some to the Inns of Court; whilst others
+had insinuated themselves into private families; but
+wherever they took up their abode, and in whatsoever
+capacity, their one aim and object had been
+to seduce the queen's subjects from their allegiance.
+So successful had been their efforts that Philip
+meditated another attack on England in 1592. At
+length commissioners were appointed in all parts
+of the country to search for these "venemous vipers."
+Householders were at the same time directed to
+enquire into the antecedents of those who lodged
+with them, and to mark if they attended Divine
+Service or not. A register or calendar of particulars
+respecting them was to be kept, to be shown on
+demand.<a id="noteref_1701" name="noteref_1701" href="#note_1701"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1701</span></span></a> Here is a description of one whose arrest
+was desired in 1596:—"A yonge man of meane and
+slender stature aged about xxvj<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="vertical-align: super">tie</span></span> w<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="vertical-align: super">th</span></span> a high collored
+face, red nose, a warte over his left eye, havinge
+two greate teeth before standinge out very apparant,
+he nameth himselffe Edward Harrison borne in
+Westmerland, apparelled in a crane collored fustian
+dublet, rounde hose, after the frenche facion, an
+olde paire of yollowe knit neather stockes, he
+escaped w<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="vertical-align: super">th</span></span>out either cloake, girdle, garters or
+shoes."<a id="noteref_1702" name="noteref_1702" href="#note_1702"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1702</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Privateering expeditions against Spain, 1591-1592.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Whilst all exportation of munitions of war, corn
+and other victual into Spain or Portugal was strictly
+forbidden,<a id="noteref_1703" name="noteref_1703" href="#note_1703"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1703</span></span></a> the merchants of London, as well as
+noblemen and wealthy country gentlemen, were<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page551">[pg 551]</span><a name="Pg551" id="Pg551" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc305" id="toc305"></a>
+encouraged to deal blows at the enemy by fitting out
+privateers for scouring the Spanish Main.<a id="noteref_1704" name="noteref_1704" href="#note_1704"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1704</span></span></a> Many a
+rich prize was thus brought home, the spoil being
+divided by specially appointed commissioners,<a id="noteref_1705" name="noteref_1705" href="#note_1705"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1705</span></span></a> whose
+duty it was, among other things, to see that the
+Crown was not defrauded of the custom due upon the
+goods thus captured."<a id="noteref_1706" name="noteref_1706" href="#note_1706"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1706</span></span></a> The "fleet of the city of
+London" was very successful in this kind of work,
+and a sum of £6,000 fell to its lot as prize-money in
+1591. This sum was ventured again in an expedition
+undertaken by Raleigh in the following year,<a id="noteref_1707" name="noteref_1707" href="#note_1707"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1707</span></span></a> with
+the result that the City netted no less a sum than
+£12,000, its share of the spoil of a rich "carraque"
+that Raleigh had captured.<a id="noteref_1708" name="noteref_1708" href="#note_1708"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1708</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Proposal to build a pest-house for the city, 1592.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">This lucky windfall befell the citizens at a time
+when money was sorely needed for building a pest-house
+or hospital for sufferers from the plague, which
+again visited the city at the close of 1592.<a id="noteref_1709" name="noteref_1709" href="#note_1709"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1709</span></span></a> The cost
+of such a building was estimated at £6,000. Various
+schemes were proposed for raising the money. At
+one time (July, 1593) it was resolved that the several
+livery companies which had taken shares in Raleigh's
+venture should contribute twelvepence in the pound
+of their clear gain towards the object.<a id="noteref_1710" name="noteref_1710" href="#note_1710"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1710</span></span></a> Later on
+(May, 1594) the companies were called upon to
+contribute one-third of their clear gain. Even this<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page552">[pg 552]</span><a name="Pg552" id="Pg552" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+proved insufficient, and had to be supplemented by a
+"benevolence" in each ward.<a id="noteref_1711" name="noteref_1711" href="#note_1711"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1711</span></span></a> Another year went
+by, and the hospital was still unfinished.<a id="noteref_1712" name="noteref_1712" href="#note_1712"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1712</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The hysterical Anne Burnell.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The strain which the continuation of the war
+and the threatened renewal of a Spanish invasion
+imposed upon the inhabitants of London at large was
+a great one, and appears to have affected the mind of
+a weak and hysterical woman, Anne Burnell. She
+gave out that she was a daughter of the king of Spain,
+and that the arms of England and Spain were to be
+seen, like <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">stigmata</span></span>, upon her back, as was vouched
+for by her servant Alice Digges. After medical examination,
+which proved her statement to be "false
+and proceedinge of some lewde and imposterouse
+pretence," she and her maid were ordered to be
+whipt,—"ther backes only beeinge layd bare,"—at
+the cart's tail through the city on a market day,
+"with a note in writinge uppon the hinder part of
+there heades shewinge the cawse of there saide
+punishmente."<a id="noteref_1713" name="noteref_1713" href="#note_1713"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1713</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Six ships, two pinnaces and 350 men provided by the City against Spain, July, 1594.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">On the 16th July, 1594, the queen informed the
+citizens by letter of the king of Spain having made
+preparations to get possession of the harbour of
+Brest, and her determination to oppose him. She
+had given orders for certain companies of soldiers to
+be levied in divers counties, and she called upon the
+citizens to furnish her with a contingent of 450
+men. They were to be well trained and supplied
+with armour and weapons; their "coate and conduct
+monye" would be found for them.<a id="noteref_1714" name="noteref_1714" href="#note_1714"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1714</span></span></a> The Court of<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page553">[pg 553]</span><a name="Pg553" id="Pg553" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc306" id="toc306"></a>
+Common Council met on the following day and
+agreed to provide the number of soldiers required.<a id="noteref_1715" name="noteref_1715" href="#note_1715"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1715</span></span></a>
+It had already (15 July) agreed to furnish six ships
+and two pinnaces for her majesty's service,<a id="noteref_1716" name="noteref_1716" href="#note_1716"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1716</span></span></a> which
+William Garraway and other owners of ships contracted
+to find for the sum of £5,000.<a id="noteref_1717" name="noteref_1717" href="#note_1717"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1717</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Sir John Spencer and his daughter.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">On Michaelmas-day (1594) John Spencer—"Rich
+Spencer" as he was called, from his extraordinary
+wealth—was elected mayor for the ensuing
+year.<a id="noteref_1718" name="noteref_1718" href="#note_1718"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1718</span></span></a> His daughter, much against her father's will,
+married Lord Compton. To thwart the matrimonial
+designs of a nobleman was in those days a perilous
+task, and Alderman Spencer was committed to the
+Fleet "for a contempt" in endeavouring to conceal
+his daughter. "Our Sir John Spencer, of London"—writes
+John Chamberlain<a id="noteref_1719" name="noteref_1719" href="#note_1719"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1719</span></span></a> to Dudley Carleton
+(15 March, 1599)—"was the last weeke committed
+to the Fleet for a contempt and hiding away his
+daughter, who, they say, is contracted to the Lord
+Compton; but now he is out again, and by all
+meanes seekes to hinder the match, alledging a
+precontract to Sir Arthur Henningham's sonne.
+But upon his beating and misusing her she was
+sequestred to one Barkers, a proctor, and from
+thence to Sir Henry Billingsleyes,<a id="noteref_1720" name="noteref_1720" href="#note_1720"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1720</span></span></a> where she yet<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page554">[pg 554]</span><a name="Pg554" id="Pg554" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+remaines till the matter be tried. If the obstinate
+and self-willed fellow shold persist in his doggednes
+(as he protests he will) and geve her nothing, the
+poore lord shold have a warme catch."</p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">A few weeks after Spencer's confinement in the
+Fleet we find him at variance with his brother aldermen
+for digging a pit on his estate near "Canbury,"
+or Canonbury, and thereby drawing off water which
+should have gone to supply the poor of St. Bartholomew's
+Hospital to his own mansion. A request was
+sent to him by the mayor and Court of Aldermen
+to cease the conveyance of water until further
+order had been taken therein.<a id="noteref_1721" name="noteref_1721" href="#note_1721"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1721</span></span></a> Two years later
+his "doggednes" once more got him into trouble,
+and he was committed to Wood Street Compter
+for refusing to pay certain small sums of money due
+from him towards furnishing soldiers and armour.<a id="noteref_1722" name="noteref_1722" href="#note_1722"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1722</span></span></a>
+He died the 30th March, 1609, leaving behind him
+£80,000.</p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">His daughter, who inherited her father's money,
+was possessed also of some of her father's spirit, and
+Lord Compton appears to have got "a warme catch"
+indeed to judge from a letter she addressed to him
+soon after her father's death. After reminding her
+"sweete life" of the care she had ever taken of his
+estate and of her excellent behaviour, she begs him
+to allow her £1,600 per annum, to be paid quarterly,
+besides £600 a year for charitable works. She will
+have three horses for her own saddle "that none
+shall dare to lend or borrow; none lend but I, none
+borrow but you." She will have so many gentlemen<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page555">[pg 555]</span><a name="Pg555" id="Pg555" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc307" id="toc307"></a>
+and so many gentlewomen to wait upon her at home,
+whilst riding, hunting, hawking or travelling. When
+on the road she will have laundresses "sent away
+with the carriages to see all safe," and chambermaids
+sent before with the grooms that the chambers may
+be ready, sweet and clean. Seeing that her requests
+are so reasonable she expects her husband to find her
+children in apparel and schooling, and all her servants
+in wages. She concludes by declaring her will to
+have her houses handsomely furnished, not omitting
+"silver warming pans," warns her husband against
+lending money to the lord chamberlain, and prays
+him to increase her allowance and double her attendance
+on his becoming an earl.<a id="noteref_1723" name="noteref_1723" href="#note_1723"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1723</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The capture of Cadiz, July, 1596.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Spencer was succeeded in the mayoralty by
+Sir Stephen Slaney, and the latter's year of office
+proved a busy one. Spain was meditating another
+descent on England "with a greate navy of shippes
+by sea and huge powers of men by lande," and the
+City was expected to furnish sixteen ships and 10,000
+men for land service. The naval demand was
+extravagant, and after some remonstrance was reduced
+to one for twelve ships and two pinnaces,
+with a complement of 1,200 men.<a id="noteref_1724" name="noteref_1724" href="#note_1724"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1724</span></span></a> The City made
+an attempt to get a reduction made also in the land
+force, but with what success is not clear. This was
+in December, 1595. The money was found by
+imposing a tax of 2<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">s.</span></span> 8<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">d.</span></span> in the pound for goods
+and 4<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">s.</span></span> in the pound for lands on every inhabitant
+of the city,<a id="noteref_1725" name="noteref_1725" href="#note_1725"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1725</span></span></a> and by advances made by the livery<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page556">[pg 556]</span><a name="Pg556" id="Pg556" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+companies.<a id="noteref_1726" name="noteref_1726" href="#note_1726"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1726</span></span></a> On the 8th January (1596) the queen
+addressed a very gracious letter of thanks to the
+City for the promptitude displayed in furnishing
+the ships.<a id="noteref_1727" name="noteref_1727" href="#note_1727"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1727</span></span></a> Instead of waiting for Spain to attack,
+Elizabeth carried the war into the enemy's country,
+and Cadiz was captured six months later by Essex
+and Howard. This exploit, in which the city of
+London took its share, has been described<a id="noteref_1728" name="noteref_1728" href="#note_1728"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1728</span></span></a> as the
+most brilliant that had ever been achieved by English
+arms between Agincourt and Blenheim, and it was
+celebrated in London with bonfires and general
+rejoicing.<a id="noteref_1729" name="noteref_1729" href="#note_1729"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1729</span></span></a> As soon as the Common Council heard of
+the arrival of the fleet from its successful voyage it
+despatched commissioners to see after the City's
+share of prize money.<a id="noteref_1730" name="noteref_1730" href="#note_1730"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1730</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Calais falls into the hands of Spain, April, 1596.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">In the meantime (April, 1596) the queen's
+tortuous and parsimonious policy had led to Calais
+falling into the hands of Spain. She had called upon
+the Londoners to furnish 1,000 soldiers to assist in
+raising the siege, but it is a question whether they
+ever got beyond Dover.<a id="noteref_1731" name="noteref_1731" href="#note_1731"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1731</span></span></a> Roused for the time to
+a more energetic line of action, she determined to
+prevent, if possible, the sister town of Boulogne
+falling into the hands of Spain, and she called upon
+the city of London to supply 405 men towards the
+force to be despatched in the autumn for its defence.<a id="noteref_1732" name="noteref_1732" href="#note_1732"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1732</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Reinforcements for the Netherlands, July, 1596.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The necessity of recruiting the garrison of the
+cautionary town of Flushing, from which troops had<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page557">[pg 557]</span><a name="Pg557" id="Pg557" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc308" id="toc308"></a>
+recently been withdrawn for service on the high seas,
+compelled the queen to apply again to the City (July,
+1596) for a contingent of 200 men.<a id="noteref_1733" name="noteref_1733" href="#note_1733"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1733</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">A demand for ten ships to be furnished by the City, Dec., 1596.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">This constant drain on the resources of the city
+at length called forth a remonstrance. The city was
+being threatened with famine at the close of the year
+(1596), when another demand arrived for ten ships to
+be fitted out for the public service. The matter was
+referred to a committee, and a reply was drawn up,
+which was practically a refusal to obey the commands
+of the council.<a id="noteref_1734" name="noteref_1734" href="#note_1734"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1734</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The City's reply.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">It set forth the utter inability of the citizens,
+however willing they might be, to supply more ships.
+They had already expended on sea service alone,
+and irrespective of their disbursements in 1588, no less
+a sum than 100,000 marks within the last few years;
+so that the lords of the council would see that the
+citizens had not been wanting in good will and affection
+towards] that service. The same good will still remained,
+but there was lacking the like ability, owing
+partly to former charges by sea and land, but more
+especially to the great scarcity of victual which had
+continued in the city for the past three years, and had
+compelled many who had formerly been well off to
+reduce their expenditure, whilst others had been
+obliged to relinquish their trades and break up their
+households. As a proof of the poverty existing in the
+city their lordships were reminded that when wheat
+was offered at a very moderate rate many were too
+poor to purchase any. The wealthier sort would<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page558">[pg 558]</span><a name="Pg558" id="Pg558" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+therefore have to be called upon to subscribe towards
+the maintenance of the poorer class, and so be rendered
+less able to contribute to other demands. The
+letter proceeded to draw their lordships' attention to
+what after all was the reason which weighed most
+with the citizens for refusing to contribute any more
+to the naval service. "Besides theis defectes" wrote
+the mayor and corporation "we may not conceale the
+great discontentment and utter discouragement of
+the common people w<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="vertical-align: super">th</span></span>in this citie touchinge their
+adventure in the late viage to the towne at <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Cales</span></span>
+[Cadiz] w<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="vertical-align: super">ch</span></span> albeit it was perfourmed w<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="vertical-align: super">th</span></span> soe great
+honor and happy successe as that the enemye was
+greatly weakned, the army enritched and such store
+of treasure and other comodities (besides that w<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="vertical-align: super">ch</span></span>
+was thear embeazelled) brought safe home as was
+sufficient to defraye the charges of the whole voyage,
+yet forasmuch as neither their principall nor any
+parte thereof was restored unto them contrarie to
+the meaninge of the contract set downe in writinge
+under the signatures of two noble persons in her
+highnes name, they are made hereby utterly unfitt
+and indisposed for the like service to be done hereafter."<a id="noteref_1735" name="noteref_1735" href="#note_1735"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1735</span></span></a>
+The Cadiz adventure—they went on to
+say—had cost the City £1,900, a great part of which
+sum was still not collected, whilst the City's Chamber
+was already in debt to the extent of £14,000 and
+utterly unable to afford relief. The writers, in conclusion,
+expressed themselves ready to contribute<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page559">[pg 559]</span><a name="Pg559" id="Pg559" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc309" id="toc309"></a>
+towards the defence of the whole realm in like proportion
+as others of her majesty's subjects, and with
+this arrangement they felt sure her majesty would be
+well content.</p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">What was the effect of this reply does not
+appear; but in one respect the queen was more than
+a match for the citizens. They had pleaded scarcity
+of provisions and poverty as an excuse for not
+carrying out her recent orders. Very good; let the
+livery companies, whose duty it was to find men
+and money when required, practise a little self-restraint
+in the coming summer (1597). Let them,
+she said, forbear giving feasts in their halls and
+elsewhere, and bestow half the money thus saved
+on the poor; and the order of the Court of Aldermen
+went forth accordingly.<a id="noteref_1736" name="noteref_1736" href="#note_1736"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1736</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Affairs in Ireland, 1594-1599.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">For some years past it had always been feared
+lest Spain should again endeavour to strike at England
+through Ireland. A rising in Ulster under Hugh
+O'Neill, known in England as the Earl of Tyrone, in
+1594 was followed by an appeal to Spain for help in
+1595. Philip acceded to the request and another
+Armada was got ready; but the fleet had scarcely put
+to sea before it suffered a similar fate to the Armada
+of 1588 and was shattered by a storm (Dec., 1596).
+The Tyrone rebellion necessitated further calls on the
+City for men and money. In May, 1597, it was asked
+to furnish 500 men, such as Sir Samuel Bagnall might
+approve of.<a id="noteref_1737" name="noteref_1737" href="#note_1737"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1737</span></span></a> In the following year—when Bagnall
+met with a crushing defeat on the Blackwater—it
+was called upon to supply a further contingent of<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page560">[pg 560]</span><a name="Pg560" id="Pg560" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+300 men and to lend the queen a sum of £20,000.<a id="noteref_1738" name="noteref_1738" href="#note_1738"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1738</span></span></a>
+In 1599 Elizabeth sent her favourite Essex to conquer
+Ireland in good earnest, to prevent the country falling
+into the hands of Spain. She at the same time
+called upon the City for more soldiers, and borrowed
+another sum of £60,000 on mortgage.<a id="noteref_1739" name="noteref_1739" href="#note_1739"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1739</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">A scare in London, July-Aug., 1598.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">In the meantime a report again got abroad that a
+Spanish fleet was assembling at Brest for a descent on
+England. On the 25th July, 1598, the lords of the
+council wrote to the mayor calling upon him to see
+that some twelve or sixteen vessels were provided
+with ordnance and powder for the defence of the
+Thames, and the court of Common Council at once
+took the necessary steps for fitting out the ships as
+well as for mustering a force of 3,000 men, afterwards
+raised to 6,000.<a id="noteref_1740" name="noteref_1740" href="#note_1740"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1740</span></span></a> The city's forces and the charge of
+the river were confided to the Earl of Cumberland.
+Sir Thomas Gerrard had at first been appointed colonel
+of the Londoners, "but for an old grudge since the last
+parliament they wold none of him."<a id="noteref_1741" name="noteref_1741" href="#note_1741"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1741</span></span></a> It was proposed
+to throw a bridge of boats across the Thames near
+Gravesend, after the fashion of Parma's famous bridge
+erected across the Scheldt in 1585, and the court of
+Common Council (4 Aug.) gave orders for collecting<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page561">[pg 561]</span><a name="Pg561" id="Pg561" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc310" id="toc310"></a>
+"hoyes, barges, lighters, boardes, cordes" and other
+material necessary for the purpose.<a id="noteref_1742" name="noteref_1742" href="#note_1742"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1742</span></span></a> This project
+was, however, abandoned in favour of sinking hulks
+in the channel of the river if occasion should arise.
+Watch was ordered to be strictly kept in the city
+night and day, lanterns to be hung out at night and
+the streets blocked with chains.<a id="noteref_1743" name="noteref_1743" href="#note_1743"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1743</span></span></a> It had been
+rumoured that the Spanish fleet had been descried
+off the Isle of Wight, and although the rumour
+proved false it caused no little alarm in the city
+and gave rise to these precautions.<a id="noteref_1744" name="noteref_1744" href="#note_1744"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1744</span></span></a> After a few
+days the supposed danger passed away. The fleet,
+which had been rapidly got together, and included
+twelve ships and thirty hoys furnished by the city
+for the defence of the river, put to sea nevertheless,
+whilst the land forces were gradually disbanded.<a id="noteref_1745" name="noteref_1745" href="#note_1745"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1745</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The abortive insurrection of the Earl of Essex, Feb., 1601.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The administration of Essex in Ireland was a
+signal failure, and he made matters worse by quitting
+his post without leave and forcing his presence upon
+the queen. He had hoped to recover her good grace
+by his unexpected appearance. Elizabeth was not
+to be thus cajoled. She ordered him into custody,
+deprived him of his offices, and, what was of more
+importance to him, refused to renew his patent of a
+monopoly of sweet wines. Although the earl soon
+regained his liberty he could not forget his disgrace,
+and his overweening vanity drove him to concert
+measures against the government. In 1601 he rode
+at the head of a few followers into the city, expecting
+the citizens to rise in his favour. The mayor had,<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page562">[pg 562]</span><a name="Pg562" id="Pg562" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+however, been forewarned, and 1,000 men were held
+in readiness in each ward fully armed for the safeguard
+of the city.<a id="noteref_1746" name="noteref_1746" href="#note_1746"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1746</span></span></a> The earl and his band proceeded
+to the house of Thomas Smith, in Fenchurch Street,
+one of the sheriffs, who had represented himself, or
+been represented by others, as able and willing to
+further the earl's cause. That the sheriff was thought
+by his fellow citizens to have been implicated in
+Essex's mad attempt is seen from the fact that within
+a week he was deprived, not only of his sheriffwick,
+but also of his aldermanry,<a id="noteref_1747" name="noteref_1747" href="#note_1747"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1747</span></span></a> but to what extent he
+had compromised himself it is difficult to determine.
+Finding the citizens averse to a rising and his passage
+stopped by pikemen under the command of Sir John
+Gilbert and Sir Robert Cross, who respectively had
+charge of Ludgate and Newgate,<a id="noteref_1748" name="noteref_1748" href="#note_1748"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1748</span></span></a> and who refused
+to surrender them except to the sheriff in person as
+the queen's representative, the earl and his company
+hastened to the riverside and returned to Essex House
+by water. He was subsequently arrested and committed
+to the Tower, together with two of his
+accomplices, the Earls of Rutland and Southampton.
+Another of his followers, the Earl of Bedford, was
+committed for a while to the custody of Leonard
+Holiday, a city alderman.<a id="noteref_1749" name="noteref_1749" href="#note_1749"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1749</span></span></a> The queen, who had
+shown no more agitation at the news of the attempt
+to raise the city than "of a fray in Fleet Street,"<a id="noteref_1750" name="noteref_1750" href="#note_1750"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1750</span></span></a><span class="tei tei-pb" id="page563">[pg 563]</span><a name="Pg563" id="Pg563" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc311" id="toc311"></a>
+took an early opportunity of thanking the citizens
+and her subjects generally for the loyalty they had
+displayed.<a id="noteref_1751" name="noteref_1751" href="#note_1751"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1751</span></span></a></p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">A sum of £200 was distributed by the civic
+authorities among the officers engaged in the city's
+defence, but the two knights at Ludgate and Newgate
+refused to accept any gratuity.<a id="noteref_1752" name="noteref_1752" href="#note_1752"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1752</span></span></a> For a week or more
+strict guard was kept at the city's gates, whilst bodies
+of troops fully armed were kept in readiness at the
+Royal Exchange and Saint Paul's Churchyard in case
+of disturbance.<a id="noteref_1753" name="noteref_1753" href="#note_1753"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1753</span></span></a> Essex was brought to trial on a
+charge of treason, convicted and executed (25 Feb.).
+Sheriff Smith was made to undergo a severe cross-examination,
+but appears to have got off with his
+life.<a id="noteref_1754" name="noteref_1754" href="#note_1754"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1754</span></span></a></p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">Mountjoy's conquest of Ireland, 1600-1603.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Lord Mountjoy, who had succeeded Essex in
+Ireland, set to work systematically to bring the
+country into complete submission. The conquest
+was not effected without considerable aid from the
+city of London. From 1600 to 1602 the citizens
+were being constantly called upon to supply fresh
+forces for Ireland.<a id="noteref_1755" name="noteref_1755" href="#note_1755"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1755</span></span></a> A Spanish force which at length
+came to Tyrone's assistance in 1601, and established
+itself at Kinsale, was compelled to surrender. The
+work of the sword was supplemented by famine;
+until at last Tyrone himself was carried in triumph to
+Dublin, and the conquest of Ireland was complete.</p>
+
+<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page564">[pg 564]</span><a name="Pg564" id="Pg564" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The parliament of 1601.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Mountjoy's work could not be carried on without
+money, and Elizabeth had been compelled in 1601 to
+summon a parliament to obtain supplies. Hitherto
+the Puritans, who began in the early part of the
+reign to gain a hold in the House of Commons, and
+had gradually increased in strength, had been content,
+in the presence of a common danger, to refrain from
+offering any systematic opposition to Elizabeth's
+government. But now that the defeat of the
+Armada, the death of Philip II and the firm
+establishment of Henry IV on the throne of France
+had removed all danger from abroad, they began to
+change front. As soon as the House met the
+Commons chose Croke (or Crooke), the City's
+Recorder, their Speaker, an honour which the City
+acknowledged by ordering (3 Nov.) a gift of forty
+marks to be made to him.<a id="noteref_1756" name="noteref_1756" href="#note_1756"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1756</span></span></a> When the question of
+supplies came before the House they were readily
+granted, but a bill was introduced to abolish patents
+of monopolies, which the queen had been in the habit
+of lavishly bestowing upon her favourites by virtue of
+her prerogative, and by which the price of nearly
+every commodity had been grievously enhanced. It
+was in vain that the minority in the House
+found fault with the Speaker for allowing the
+queen's prerogative to be called in question. The
+majority had the nation at its back; and finding
+this to be the case Elizabeth, who knew when
+to give way, yielded with grace. When a deputation
+of the Commons waited upon her and
+expressed the gratitude of the House at her concession,
+she replied in words full of kindness and<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page565">[pg 565]</span><a name="Pg565" id="Pg565" class="tei tei-anchor"></a><a name="toc312" id="toc312"></a>
+dignity, thanking the Commons for having pointed
+out her error, and calling God to witness that she
+had never cherished anything but what tended to
+her people's good, "Though you have had," she
+assured them, "and may have, many princes more
+mighty and wise sitting in this seat, yet you never
+had, or ever shall have, any that will be more
+careful and loving."</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-marginnote tei-marginnote-margin"><div class="tei tei-marginnotetext"><span style="font-size: 80%">The last days of Elizabeth, 1601-1603.</span></div></div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">These were the last words addressed by the
+queen to her people, and their truth was borne out by
+her conduct throughout her long reign. Under her
+the country had become united and prosperous. By
+the citizens of London she was especially beloved, for
+they always found in her a supporter of trade and
+commerce. If the Hanseatic towns behaved unfairly
+to the merchant adventurers Elizabeth promptly
+retaliated upon the merchants of the Steelyard.
+She had threatened to close the Steelyard altogether
+in 1578, when English merchants were ordered
+to quit Hamburg, and twenty years later (1598),
+when fresh difficulties had arisen, the threat was
+carried out.<a id="noteref_1757" name="noteref_1757" href="#note_1757"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1757</span></span></a></p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The queen rarely left London to make one of
+her many gorgeous progresses from country house to
+country house or returned home without some notice
+being sent to the city to allow of its inhabitants taking
+"the comfort of behoulding her royall persone."<a id="noteref_1758" name="noteref_1758" href="#note_1758"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1758</span></span></a>
+Her love of personal admiration and of handsome
+men continued to the last. As late as November,<span class="tei tei-pb" id="page566">[pg 566]</span><a name="Pg566" id="Pg566" class="tei tei-anchor"></a>
+1602, she commanded the mayor and aldermen and a
+number of the "best and most grave" citizens to
+attend her from Chelsea to Westminster, and the
+mayor, knowing her weakness, ordered the livery
+companies to choose the "most grave and comlie"
+members to join the procession.<a id="noteref_1759" name="noteref_1759" href="#note_1759"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">1759</span></span></a> In the early
+morning of the 24th March, 1603, she died at
+Richmond, to the sincere regret of the citizens no
+less than of the nation at large.</p>
+</div>
+</div>
+
+<div class="tei tei-div" style="margin-bottom: 5.00em; margin-top: 5.00em">
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">END OF VOL. I.</p>
+</div>
+
+</div>
+
+<hr class="doublepage" /><div class="tei tei-back" style="margin-bottom: 2.00em; margin-top: 6.00em">
+<div class="tei tei-div" style="margin-bottom: 5.00em; margin-top: 5.00em">
+
+
+
+ <div class="tei tei-div" style="margin-bottom: 4.00em; margin-top: 4.00em">
+ <h1 class="tei tei-head" style="text-align: left; margin-bottom: 3.46em; margin-top: 3.46em"><span style="font-size: 173%">Footnotes</span></h1>
+ <dl class="tei tei-list-footnotes"><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1" name="note_1" href="#noteref_1">1.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Strype remarks of Thames water that it "did sooner become fine
+and clear than the New River water, and was ever a clearer water."—Strype,
+Stow's Survey, ed. 1720, bk. i, p. 25. Another writer
+speaks of "that most delicate and serviceable ryver of Thames."—Howes's
+Chron., p. 938.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_2" name="note_2" href="#noteref_2">2.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">During Edgar's reign (958-975), the foreign trade of the City had
+increased to such a degree, and notably with a body of German
+merchants from the Eastern shores of the Baltic, called "Easterlings"
+(subsequently known as the Hanse Merchants of the Steel-yard), that
+his son and successor Ethelred drew up a code of laws for the purpose
+of regulating it.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_3" name="note_3" href="#noteref_3">3.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">"Et ipsa (<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">i.e.</span></span> Lundonia) multorum emporium populorum terrâ
+marique venientium."—Hist. Eccl., lib. ii, cap. iii.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_4" name="note_4" href="#noteref_4">4.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Stubbs, Const. Hist., i, 409.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_5" name="note_5" href="#noteref_5">5.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">See ordinances made by the Earl (32 Eliz.).—Hunter's Hallamshire
+(1819), p. 119.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_6" name="note_6" href="#noteref_6">6.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Luttrell, Diary, i, p. 314.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_7" name="note_7" href="#noteref_7">7.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">"At Suetonius mira constantia medios inter hostes Londinium
+perrexit, cognomento quidem coloniæ non insigne, sed copia negotiatorum
+et commeatuum maxime celebre."—Tacitus, Ann., xiv, 33.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_8" name="note_8" href="#noteref_8">8.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">For the direction of the various routes, see Elton's Origins of
+Engl. Hist., p. 344 note.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_9" name="note_9" href="#noteref_9">9.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Stubbs, Const. Hist., i., 60.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_10" name="note_10" href="#noteref_10">10.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The church of St. Peter-upon-Cornhill claims a Roman origin,
+but its claim is unsubstantiated by any proof.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_11" name="note_11" href="#noteref_11">11.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">This appeal took the following form:—"The groans of the
+Britons to Aetius, for the third time Consul [<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">i.e.</span></span> <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-variant: small-caps">A.D.</span></span> 446]. The
+savages drive us to the sea, and the sea casts us back upon the savages;
+so arise two kinds of death, and we are either drowned or slaughtered."—Elton,
+Origins of Engl. Hist., p. 360.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_12" name="note_12" href="#noteref_12">12.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">"Postea vero explorata insulæ fertilitate et indigenarum inertia,
+rupto fœdere, in ipsos, a quibus fuerant invitati arma verterunt."—Newburgh,
+Hist. Rerum Anglic. (Rolls Series No. 82). Proœmium.
+p. 13.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_13" name="note_13" href="#noteref_13">13.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Anglo-Sax. Chron., ii, 12.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_14" name="note_14" href="#noteref_14">14.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">"In qua videlicet gente tune temporis Sabertus, nepos Ethelberti
+ex sorore Ricula, regnabat quamvis sub potestate positus ejusdem
+Ethelberti, qui omnibus, ut supra dictum est, usque ad terminum
+Humbræ fluminis, Anglorum gentibus imperabat."—Bede, Lib. ii, c. iii.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_15" name="note_15" href="#noteref_15">15.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">"Quorum [<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">i.e.</span></span>, Orientalium Saxonum] metropolis Lundonia
+civitas est."—Bede, Lib. ii, c. iii. So, again, another writer describes
+London at the time it was devastated by the Danes in 851 as "Sita
+in aquilonari ripa Tamesis fluminis in confinio East-Sæxum et Middel-Sæxum,
+sed tamen ad East-Sæxum illa civitas cum veritate pertinet."—Flor.
+Wigorn., (ed. by Thorpe, for Engl. Hist. Soc.), i, 72.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_16" name="note_16" href="#noteref_16">16.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Kemble. Saxons in England, ii, 556.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_17" name="note_17" href="#noteref_17">17.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">"Mellitum vero Lundonienses episcopum recipere noluerunt,
+idolatris magis pontificibus servire gaudentes. Bede, Lib. ii, cap. vi.—<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Cf.</span></span>
+Flor. Wigorn., i, 13.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_18" name="note_18" href="#noteref_18">18.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">"Ecclesiam ... beati Petri quæ sita est in loco terribili qui
+ab incolis Thorneye nunenpatur ... quæ olim ... beati
+Æthelberti hortatu ... a Sabertho prædivite quodam sub-regulo
+Lundoniæ, nepote videlicet ipsius regis, constructa est."—Kemble, Cod.
+Dipl., 555.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_19" name="note_19" href="#noteref_19">19.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Roger de Hoveden (Rolls Series No. 51), i, 8, 16, 18.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_20" name="note_20" href="#noteref_20">20.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Norton, Commentaries on the City of London, 3rd ed., p. 53, &amp;c.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_21" name="note_21" href="#noteref_21">21.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Thorpe, 114. The Troy weight was kept in the Husting of
+London and known as the Husting-weight.—Strype, Stow's Survey
+(1720), Bk. v., 369.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_22" name="note_22" href="#noteref_22">22.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Anglo-Sax. Chron., ii, 55.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_23" name="note_23" href="#noteref_23">23.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">"And in the same year [<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">i.e.</span></span> 851] came three hundred and fifty
+ships to the mouth of the Thames, and landed, and took Canterbury
+and London by storm."—<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span> ii, 56.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_24" name="note_24" href="#noteref_24">24.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Anglo-Sax. Chron., ii, 64, 65.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_25" name="note_25" href="#noteref_25">25.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The Anglo-Saxon Chronicle—the existence of which in its present
+form has been attributed to Alfred's encouragement of literature—seems
+to convey this meaning, although it is not quite clear on the point. Henry
+of Huntingdon (Rolls Series No. 44, pp. 148-149) ascribes the
+recovery of London by Alfred to the year 886. The late Professor
+Freeman (Norman Conquest, i., 56) does the same, and compares the
+status of London at the time with that of a German free city, which
+it more nearly resembled, than an integral portion of a kingdom.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_26" name="note_26" href="#noteref_26">26.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Freeman, Norman Conquest, i, 279.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_27" name="note_27" href="#noteref_27">27.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Anglo-Sax. Chron., ii., 67. <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Cf.</span></span> "Lundoniam civitatem honorifice
+restauravit et habitabilem fecit quam etiam. Ætheredo Merciorum comitti
+servandam commendavit."—Flor. Wigorn., i, 101.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_28" name="note_28" href="#noteref_28">28.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Stubbs, Const. Hist., i, 405.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_29" name="note_29" href="#noteref_29">29.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Anglo-Sax. Chron., ii, 71.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_30" name="note_30" href="#noteref_30">30.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">According to Henry of Huntingdon (Rolls Series No. 74. p. 150)
+Alfred diverted the waters of the Lea that his enemy's ships were
+stranded.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_31" name="note_31" href="#noteref_31">31.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, ii. 71. <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Cf.</span></span> "Quarum navium Lundonienses quasdam Lundoniam
+vehunt, quasdam vero penitus confringunt."—Flor. Wigorn., i, 115.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_32" name="note_32" href="#noteref_32">32.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Judicia Civitatis Lundoniæ, Thorpe, 97, 103.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_33" name="note_33" href="#noteref_33">33.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">This is the earliest mention of a guildhall in London; and the ale-making
+which took place at the meeting of the officers of the frith-guild,
+accounts in all probability for Giraldus Cambrensis (Vita Galfridi,
+Rolls Series No. 21 iii., c. 8.) having described the Guildhall of London
+as "Aula publica quæ a potorum conventu nomen accepit."</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_34" name="note_34" href="#noteref_34">34.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">"Notwithstanding the butt-filling and feasting, this appears to
+have been a purely religious and social guild, and, although it may have
+subsequently become a power in the city, so far, it is only of importance
+as the first evidence of combination among the inhabitants of London
+for anything like corporate action."—Loftie, Hist. of London, i, 68.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_35" name="note_35" href="#noteref_35">35.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Laws of Athelstan.—Thorpe, 93.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_36" name="note_36" href="#noteref_36">36.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Judicia Civitatis Lundoniæ.—Thorpe, 100.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_37" name="note_37" href="#noteref_37">37.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Gross, The Gild Merchant, i, 178-179.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_38" name="note_38" href="#noteref_38">38.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Wilkins, Leges Anglo-Sax., p. 59.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_39" name="note_39" href="#noteref_39">39.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">"And if a merchant thrived so that he fared thrice over the wide
+sea by his own means [cɲæƥte, craft] then was he thenceforth of thane-right
+worthy." (Thorpe, 81.) The word cɲæƥte is similarly translated
+in Wilkins's Leges Anglo-Saxonicæ; (ed. 1721, p. 71.) <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">per facultates suas</span></span>;
+but there seems no reason why it should not be taken to mean literally
+a craft or vessel. The passage occurs in a list of "People's Rank"
+which "formerly" prevailed, and is probably of Athelstan's time, even
+if it did not form part of the Judicia Civitatis Lundoniæ.—Wilkins,
+<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">op. cit.</span></span> p. 70 note.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_40" name="note_40" href="#noteref_40">40.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Anglo-Sax. Chron., ii, 105.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_41" name="note_41" href="#noteref_41">41.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Anglo-Sax. Chron., ii, p. 114.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_42" name="note_42" href="#noteref_42">42.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span> ii, p. 115.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_43" name="note_43" href="#noteref_43">43.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span> ii. pp. 117, 118. Annal. Monast., Waverley (Rolls Series
+No. 36), ii, p. 173.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_44" name="note_44" href="#noteref_44">44.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The towns of Leicester, Lincoln, Nottingham, Stamford, and
+Derby, which for many years were occupied by the Danes, were so
+called.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_45" name="note_45" href="#noteref_45">45.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Anglo-Sax. Chron., ii, pp. 118, 119.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_46" name="note_46" href="#noteref_46">46.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span> ii, p. 119. Henry
+of Huntingdon (Rolls Series No 74), p. 180.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_47" name="note_47" href="#noteref_47">47.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Anglo-Sax. Chron., ii, p. 120.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_48" name="note_48" href="#noteref_48">48.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span> ii, p. 120. <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Cf.</span></span> "Ad hæc
+principes se non amplius Danicum regem admissuros in Angliam
+unanimiter spoponderunt."—Flor. Wigorn., i, p. 169.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_49" name="note_49" href="#noteref_49">49.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The Heimskringla or Chronicle of the kings of Norway, translated
+from the Icelandic of Snorro Sturleson, ii. pp. 8-11.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_50" name="note_50" href="#noteref_50">50.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Anglo-Sax. Chron., ii, 120.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_51" name="note_51" href="#noteref_51">51.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Anglo-Sax. Chron., ii, 121.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_52" name="note_52" href="#noteref_52">52.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span> ii., 122.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_53" name="note_53" href="#noteref_53">53.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Malmesbury, Gesta Regum (Rolls Series, No. 90), i, 215.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_54" name="note_54" href="#noteref_54">54.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Freeman, Norman Conquest, i, 308.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_55" name="note_55" href="#noteref_55">55.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Thorpe, Ancient Laws and Institutes, 127, 128.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_56" name="note_56" href="#noteref_56">56.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">In course of time the natives of Denmark acquired the privilege
+of sojourning all the year round in London—a privilege accorded to
+few, if any other, foreigners. They enjoyed moreover the benefits of
+the 'the law of the city of London' (<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">la lei de la citie de Loundres</span></span>) in
+other words, the right of resorting to fair or market in any place
+throughout England.—Liber Cust. pt. i, p. 63.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_57" name="note_57" href="#noteref_57">57.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Freeman, Norman Conquest, i, 418.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_58" name="note_58" href="#noteref_58">58.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Anglo-Sax. Chron., ii, 122.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_59" name="note_59" href="#noteref_59">59.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">"At oppidanis magnanimiter
+pugnantibus repulsa."—Malmesbury, i, 216.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_60" name="note_60" href="#noteref_60">60.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Anglo-Sax. Chron., ii, 123.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_61" name="note_61" href="#noteref_61">61.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span> ii, 121, 123. Henry of Huntingdon
+relates that Eadric caused a panic on the field of battle by crying out
+that Edmund had been killed. "Flet Engle, flet Engle, ded is
+Edmund."</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_62" name="note_62" href="#noteref_62">62.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Freeman, Norman Conquest, i, 437.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_63" name="note_63" href="#noteref_63">63.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Freeman, Norman Conquest, i, 538.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_64" name="note_64" href="#noteref_64">64.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">"The 'lithsmen' (ship-owners) of London, who with others
+raised Harold to the throne, were doubtless such 'burg-thegns.'"—Gross,
+The Gild Merchant, i, 186. <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Cf.</span></span> Lingard, i, 318. Norton
+Commentaries, pp. 23-24.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_65" name="note_65" href="#noteref_65">65.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Green, Conquest of England, p. 462. Loftie, Hist. of London,
+i, 73. "The Londoners who attended must have gone by
+way of the river in their 'liths.'"—Historic Towns, London
+(Loftie), p. 197.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_66" name="note_66" href="#noteref_66">66.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Anglo-Sax. Chron., ii, 129.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_67" name="note_67" href="#noteref_67">67.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">At the death of Harold, Harthacnut was invited to accept the
+crown by an embassy from England, of which the Bishop of London
+was a member. He accepted the offer and crossed over from the
+continent with a fleet of sixty ships, manned by Danish soldiers, and his
+first act was to demand eight marks for each rower; an imposition that
+was borne with difficulty. Anglo-Sax. Chron. ii, 132.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_68" name="note_68" href="#noteref_68">68.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Anglo-Sax Chron., ii, 132.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_69" name="note_69" href="#noteref_69">69.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Freeman, Norman Conquest, 2nd ed., ii. 5. But according to
+Kemble (Saxons in England, ii, 259 note), Edward's election took
+place at a hastily convened meeting at Gillingham.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_70" name="note_70" href="#noteref_70">70.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">"London, que caput est regni et legum. semper curia domini regis."—Laws
+of Edward Confessor, Thorpe, p. 197 note.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_71" name="note_71" href="#noteref_71">71.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">For a list of gemóts held in London from <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-variant: small-caps">A.D.</span></span> 790, see Kemble's
+Saxons in England, ii, 241-261.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_72" name="note_72" href="#noteref_72">72.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Malmesbury, i, 242-244. Freeman, ii, 148-332.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_73" name="note_73" href="#noteref_73">73.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Freeman, ii, 324.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_74" name="note_74" href="#noteref_74">74.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Sed omnis civitas duci obviam et auxilio processit et præsidio
+acclamantque illi omnes una voce prospere in adventu suo. "Life of
+Edward Conf." (Rolls Series No. 3.), p. 406.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_75" name="note_75" href="#noteref_75">75.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">"Interim quosdam per internuntios, quosdam per se cives Lundonienses,
+quos variis pollicitationibus prius illexerat, convenit, et ut omnes
+fere quæ volebat omnino vellent, effecit."—Flor. Wigorn., i., 209.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_76" name="note_76" href="#noteref_76">76.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Anglo-Sax. Chron., ii, 165-167.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_77" name="note_77" href="#noteref_77">77.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">"Aldredus autem Eboracensis archiepiscopus et iidem Comites
+cum civibus Lundoniensibus et butsecarlis, clitonem Eadgarum, Eadmundi
+Ferrei Lateris nepotem, in regem levare volueren, et cum eo se
+pugnam inituros promisere; sed dum ad pugnam descendere multi se
+paravere, comites suum auxilium ab eis retraxere, et cum suo exercitu
+domum redierunt."—Flor. Wigorn., i, 228.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_78" name="note_78" href="#noteref_78">78.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Such is the description of William's march, as given by Malmesbury
+(ii, 307). Another chronicler describes his march as one of
+slaughter and devastation.—Flor. Wigorn., i, 228.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_79" name="note_79" href="#noteref_79">79.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The bishop was certainly Norman, and so probably was the port-reeve.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_80" name="note_80" href="#noteref_80">80.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Anglo-Sax. Chron. ii, 168-169.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_81" name="note_81" href="#noteref_81">81.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">This charter is preserved in the Town Clerk's Office at the Guildhall.
+A fac-simile of it and of another charter of William, granting lands
+to Deorman, forms a frontispiece to this volume. The late Professor
+Freeman (Norman Conquest, second edition, revised 1876, iv, 29) wrote
+of this venerable parchment as bearing William's mark—"the cross traced
+by the Conqueror's own hand"—but this appears to be a mistake. The
+same authority, writing of the transcript of the charter made by the late
+Mr. Riley and printed by him in his edition of the <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Liber Custumarum</span></span>
+(Rolls Series, pt. ii, p. 504), remarks that, "one or two words here look
+a little suspicious"; and justly so, for the transcript is far from being
+literally accurate.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_82" name="note_82" href="#noteref_82">82.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Cf.</span></span> "<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Ego volo quod vos sitis omni lege illa digni qua fuistis
+Edwardi diebus Regis.</span></span>" These words appear in the xivth century Latin
+version of William's Charter, preserved at the Guildhall.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_83" name="note_83" href="#noteref_83">83.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Liber Albus (Rolls Series i, 26).</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_84" name="note_84" href="#noteref_84">84.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Opinions differ as to the derivation of the term port. Some, like
+Kemble, refer it to the Lat. <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">portus</span></span>, in the sense of an enclosed place
+for sale or purchase, a market. ("Portus est conclusus locus, quo
+importantur merces et inde exportantur. Est et statio conclusa
+et munita."—Thorpe, i, 158). Others, like Dr. Stubbs (Const.
+Hist., i, 404 n.), connect it with Lat. <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">porta</span></span>, not in its restricted
+signification of a gate, but as implying a market place, markets being
+often held at a city's gates. The Latin terms <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">porta</span></span> and <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">portus</span></span> were in
+fact so closely allied, that they both alike signified a market place or a
+gate. Thus, in the will of Edmund Harengeye, enrolled in the Court
+of Husting, London, we find the following: "Ac eciam lego et volo
+quod illa tenementa cum magno portu vocato le Brodegate ...
+vendantur per executores meos."—Hust. Roll, 114 (76).</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_85" name="note_85" href="#noteref_85">85.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Norton, Commentaries on the City of London, 3rd ed., pp. 258-259.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_86" name="note_86" href="#noteref_86">86.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">"London and her election of Stephen," a paper read before the
+Archæol. Inst. in 1866, by the late Mr. Green (p. 267).</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_87" name="note_87" href="#noteref_87">87.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Freeman, Norman Conquest, v, p. 55.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_88" name="note_88" href="#noteref_88">88.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">There appears to be no doubt that the charter preserved at the
+Guildhall had a seal, but not a fragment remains.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_89" name="note_89" href="#noteref_89">89.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">"Et dicunt quod prefatus dominus conquestor ante fundacionem
+ecclesie predicte et confeccionem carte sue de qua superius fit mencio
+auctoritate parliament sui et per duas cartes suas quas dicti maior et
+Cives hic proferunt scilicet per unam earam dimissit tunc civibus London'
+totam dictam civitatem et vice-comitatum London' cum omnibus appendiciis
+rebus et consuetudinibus eis qualitercumque pertinentibus....
+Et per alteram concessit et auctoritate supradicta confirmavit
+eisdem civibus et successoribus suis quod haberent predicta ac omnes
+alias libertates et liberas consuetudines suas illesas quas habuerunt tempore
+dicti Sancti Regis Edwardi progenitoris sui."—Letter Book K,
+fo. 120 b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_90" name="note_90" href="#noteref_90">90.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">"Tantaque pax suis regnavit temporibus, quod puella virguncula
+auro onusta, indempnis et intacta Angliam potuit peragrare."—Mat.
+Paris, Hist. Angl. (Rolls Series No. 44), i, 29.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_91" name="note_91" href="#noteref_91">91.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Anglo-Sax. Chron., ii, p. 187. Flor. Wigorn., ii, p. 19.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_92" name="note_92" href="#noteref_92">92.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Anglo-Sax. Chron., ii, p. 187. Flor. Wigorn., ii, p. 19.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_93" name="note_93" href="#noteref_93">93.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Stow's Survey (Thoms's ed.), p. 121.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_94" name="note_94" href="#noteref_94">94.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Malmesbury. ii, 375.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_95" name="note_95" href="#noteref_95">95.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Anglo-Sax. Chron., ii, 189.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_96" name="note_96" href="#noteref_96">96.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, ii, 202.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_97" name="note_97" href="#noteref_97">97.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">"Those of the council who were nigh at hand."—Anglo-Sax.
+Chron., ii, 204.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_98" name="note_98" href="#noteref_98">98.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Mat. Paris, Hist. Angl. (Rolls Series No. 44) i, 176.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_99" name="note_99" href="#noteref_99">99.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">See Round's Geoffrey de Mandeville (p. 366), where the writer
+conjectures the date of the charter to have been between 1130 and 1135,
+and brings evidence in favour of it having been purchased by the
+payment of a large sum of money.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_100" name="note_100" href="#noteref_100">100.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Set out under fifteen heads in the City's <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Liber Albus</span></span>. (Rolls
+Series) i, 128-129.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_101" name="note_101" href="#noteref_101">101.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Stubbs, Const. Hist., i, 404, 405. Round, Geoffrey de Mandeville. p. 356.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_102" name="note_102" href="#noteref_102">102.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The sum of 100 marks of silver recorded (Pipe Roll, 31 Hen. I)
+as having been paid for the shrievalty in 1130, appears to have been
+more of the nature of a fine than a <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">firma</span></span>.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_103" name="note_103" href="#noteref_103">103.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">"Whereas from time immemorial there have been and of right
+ought to be two sheriffs of this city, which said two sheriffs during all
+the time aforesaid have constituted and of right ought to constitute one
+sheriff of the county of Middlesex...."—Preamble to Act of
+Common Council, 7th April, 1748, <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">re</span></span> Nomination and election of
+Sheriffs. Journal 59, fo. 130b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_104" name="note_104" href="#noteref_104">104.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Round, Geoffrey de Mandeville, p. 357. Mr. Round's statements
+(<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">op. cit.</span></span>, Appendix P), that "this one <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">firma</span></span> ... represents
+one <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">corpus comitatus</span></span>, namely Middlesex, inclusive of London," and
+that "from this conclusion there is no escape," are more capable of
+refutation than he is willing to allow.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_105" name="note_105" href="#noteref_105">105.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">"It is probable that whilst the Sheriff in his character of Sheriff
+was competent to direct the customary business of the Court, it was in
+that of <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">justitia</span></span> that he transacted business under the King's writ."—Stubbs,
+Const. History, i, 389, note.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_106" name="note_106" href="#noteref_106">106.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">"Post hoc prædictus Justitiarius ... accessit ad Gildhalle
+Londoniarum, et ibi tenuit placita de die in diem ... et incontinenti ... ilia
+terminavit nullo juris ordine observato contra leges
+civitatis et etiam contra leges et consuetudines cujuslibet liberi hominis
+de regno Anglie. Quod vero cives semper calumpniaverunt, dicentes
+quod nullus debet placitare in civitate de transgressionibus ibidem
+factis nisi vicecomites Londoniarium."—Lib. de Ant. (Camd. Soc.),
+p. 40.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_107" name="note_107" href="#noteref_107">107.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Round. Geoffrey de Mandeville. pp. 107-113, 373, and Appendix K.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_108" name="note_108" href="#noteref_108">108.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Mat. Paris (Hist. Angl. i, 251), ascribes the incessant turmoil
+of the latter part of the reign to the vengeance of the deity for this
+breach of faith.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_109" name="note_109" href="#noteref_109">109.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">"Id quoque sui esse juris, suique specialiter privilegii, ut si rex
+ipsorum quoquo moclo obiret, alius suo provisu in regno substituendus
+e vestigio succederet."—Gesta Stephani (Rolls Series No. 82), iii, 5-6.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_110" name="note_110" href="#noteref_110">110.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">"With the solemn independent election of a king, the great part
+which London was to play in England's history had definitely begun."—Green,
+London and her Election of Stephen.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_111" name="note_111" href="#noteref_111">111.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Gesta Stephani (Rolls Series No. 82). iii. 17.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_112" name="note_112" href="#noteref_112">112.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Round, Geoffrey de Mandeville, p. 18.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_113" name="note_113" href="#noteref_113">113.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">"Eodem anno in Pentecoste resedit rex Londoniæ in Turri, episcopo
+tantum modo Sagiensi præsente: ceteri vel fastidierunt vel
+timuerunt venire. Aliquanto post, mediante legato, colloquium indictum
+est inter imperatricem et regem. si forte Deo inspirante pax reformari
+posset."—Malmesbury, Hist. Nov. (Rolls Series No. 90.), ii, 564.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_114" name="note_114" href="#noteref_114">114.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">"Juravit et affidavit imperatrix episcopo quod omnia majora negotia
+in Anglia præcipueque donationes episcopatuum et abbatiarum ejus
+nutum spectarent, si eam ipse cum sancta ecclesia in dominam reciperet
+et perpetuam ei fidelitatem teneret.... Nec dubitavit episcopus
+imperatricem in dominam Angliæ recipere, et ei cum quibusdam suis
+affidare, quod, quamdiu ipsa pactem non infringeret ipse quoque fidem
+ei custodiret."—<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.,</span></span> ii, 573.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_115" name="note_115" href="#noteref_115">115.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">"Ventilata est hesterno die causa secreto coram majori parte cleri
+Angliæ ad cujus jus potissimum spectat principem eligere, simulque
+ordinare."—<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, ii, 576.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_116" name="note_116" href="#noteref_116">116.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">"Missos se a communione quam vocant Londoniarum."—Malmesbury,
+(Hist. Nov.), ii, 576. Exception may be taken to translating
+<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">communio</span></span> as 'commune'; but even if the municipal organization
+represented by the French term <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">commune</span></span> did not at this period exist in
+the City of London in all its fulness, the "communal idea" appears
+to have been there.—Stubbs, Const. Hist., i. 407.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_117" name="note_117" href="#noteref_117">117.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">"Omnes barones qui in eorum coramunionem jamdudum recepti
+fuerant."—Malmesbury, <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Ibid.</span></span></p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_118" name="note_118" href="#noteref_118">118.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">"Proficiscitur inde cum exultatione magna et gaudio, et in monasterio
+Sancti Albani cum processionali suscipitur honore et jubilo.
+Adeunt eam ibi cives multi ex Lundonia, tractatur ibi sermo multimodus
+de reddenda civitate."—Contin. Flor. Wigorn. (Thorpe), ii, 131.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_119" name="note_119" href="#noteref_119">119.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">"Erecta est autem in superbiam intolerabilem, quia suis incerta
+belli prosperavissent."—Hen. of Huntingdon (Rolls Series No. 74), p. 275.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_120" name="note_120" href="#noteref_120">120.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">"Infinitæ copiæ pecuniam, non simplici cum mansuetudine sed
+cum ore imperioso ab eis exegit."—Gesta Stephani (Rolls Series
+No. 82), iii, 75.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_121" name="note_121" href="#noteref_121">121.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">"Interpellata est a civibus, ut leges eis regis Edwardi observari
+liceret, quia optimæ erant, non patris sui Henrici quia graves erant.
+Verum illa non bono usa consilio, præ nimia austeritate non acquievit
+eis, unde et motus magnus factus in urbe; et facta conjuratione adversus
+eam quam cum honore susceperunt. cum dedecore apprehendere
+statuerunt."—Contin. Flor. Wigorn. (Thorpe), ii, 132.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_122" name="note_122" href="#noteref_122">122.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Malmesbury (Hist. Nov.), ii, 577-578. "Sed tandem a Londoniensibus
+expulsa est in die Sancti Johannis Baptiste proximo sequenti"—Lib.
+de Ant. (Camd. Soc), p. 197.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_123" name="note_123" href="#noteref_123">123.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">"Anno prædicto [<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">i.e.</span></span> 7 Stephen, <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-variant: small-caps">A.D.</span></span> 1141], statim in illa estate,
+obsessa est Turris Lundoniarum a Londoniensibus, quam Willielmus
+[<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">sic</span></span>] de Magnaville tenebat et firmaverat."—Lib. de Ant. (Camd.
+Soc.), p. 197. From this it would appear that the father still held
+the office of constable. A charter of the empress, however, which
+Mr. Horace Round prints in his book on Geoffrey de Mandeville
+(pp. 88, <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">seq.</span></span>) points to the son as being constable at the time.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_124" name="note_124" href="#noteref_124">124.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Round, Geoffrey de Mandeville, pp. 88-95.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_125" name="note_125" href="#noteref_125">125.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">It is not to be supposed that the earl consented to assist the queen
+without meeting with some return for his services, more especially as
+the queen was prepared to go all lengths to obtain her husband's liberty.
+See Round's Geoffrey de Mandeville, p. 119.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_126" name="note_126" href="#noteref_126">126.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">"Gaufrido de Mandevilla, qui jam iterum auxilio eorum cesserat,
+antea enim post captionem regis imperatrici fidelitatem juraverat, et Londoniensibus
+maxime annitentibus, nihilque omnino quod possent prætermittentibus
+quo imperatricem contristarent."—Malmesbury (Hist.
+Nov.), ii, 580.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_127" name="note_127" href="#noteref_127">127.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">"Magnæ ex Lundoniis copiæ."—Newburgh, Hist. Rerum. Angl.
+(Rolls Series No. 82.), i, 42. "Cumque invictâ Londoniensium
+catervâ."—Gesta Stephani (Rolls Series No. 82), iii, 80. The Londoners
+sacked Winchester mercilessly. "Londonienses, cum maxima
+militum regalium parte, modis horrendis Wintoniensem civitatem expilavere."—Gesta
+Stephani, iii, 84.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_128" name="note_128" href="#noteref_128">128.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The precedent thus set by Stephen, of submitting to the ceremony
+of a second coronation after a period of captivity, was afterwards
+followed by Richard I, on his return from captivity abroad.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_129" name="note_129" href="#noteref_129">129.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">This is the date assigned to the charter by Mr. Horace Round,
+(Geoffrey de Mandeville, pp. 138-144). <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Cf.</span></span> Appendix to 31st Report
+of Deputy Keeper of the Public Records, p. 3.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_130" name="note_130" href="#noteref_130">130.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The date assigned by Mr. Round to this charter is between
+Christmas, 1141, and the end of June, 1142.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_131" name="note_131" href="#noteref_131">131.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">"Et convenciono eidem Gaufredo Comiti Essex quod dominus
+meus Comes Andegavie vel ego vel filii nostri nullam pacem aut
+concordiam cum Burgensibus Lund[oniæ] faciemus, nisi concessu et
+assensu præ-dicti Comitis Gaufredi quia inimici eius sunt mortales."—Round's
+Geoffrey de Mandeville, p. 168.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_132" name="note_132" href="#noteref_132">132.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Newburgh, Hist. Rerum Angl. (Rolls Series No. 82), i. 48. Henry
+of Huntingdon (Rolls Series No. 74), p. 278.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_133" name="note_133" href="#noteref_133">133.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Sometimes called the Treaty of Wallingford.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_134" name="note_134" href="#noteref_134">134.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The general joy is depicted in glowing colours by Henry of
+Huntingdon, (p. 289.) <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Cf.</span></span> Anglo-Sax. Chron., ii., 235.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_135" name="note_135" href="#noteref_135">135.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Fitz-Stephen's Stephanides, Stow's Survey (Thoms's ed.), p. 208.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_136" name="note_136" href="#noteref_136">136.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Freeman, Norman Conquest, v., 325.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_137" name="note_137" href="#noteref_137">137.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">A cartulary of the Mercers' Company contains a copy of a grant
+from Thomas Fitz-Theobald to the hospital of St. Thomas of Acon of
+"all that land, with the appurtenances, which was formerly of Gilbert
+Becket, father of the Blessed Thomas the Martyr, Archbishop of
+Canterbury, where the said Blessed Thomas the Martyr was born
+(<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">duxit originem</span></span>), to build a church (<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">basilicam</span></span>) in honour of
+Almighty God and the Blessed Virgin Mary, and of the same most
+glorious martyr."—Watney, Account of the Hospital of St. Thomas
+of Acon (privately printed 1892), pp. 9, 237.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_138" name="note_138" href="#noteref_138">138.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Liber Albus (Rolls Series), i, pp. 26, 27.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_139" name="note_139" href="#noteref_139">139.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">This charter (with fragment of seal) is preserved at the Guildhall.
+It bears no date, but appears to have been granted between 1154 and 1161.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_140" name="note_140" href="#noteref_140">140.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Contin. Flor. Wigorn., ii, 138.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_141" name="note_141" href="#noteref_141">141.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">"De filiis et parentibus nobilium civitatis" and again "filii et
+nepotes quorundam nobilium civium Londoniarum."—Benedict of
+Peterborough (Rolls Series No. 49), ii, 155.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_142" name="note_142" href="#noteref_142">142.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">By a strange anomaly, a man who underwent ordeal by water
+was only adjudged innocent if he sank to the bottom and was drowned.
+Hence the old man's caution!</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_143" name="note_143" href="#noteref_143">143.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Roger de Hoveden (Rolls Series No. 51), iii, 28. According to
+Richard of Devizes (Rolls Series No. 82, iii, 387), Longchamp obtained
+the chancellorship by bribery.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_144" name="note_144" href="#noteref_144">144.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Benedict (Rolls Series No. 49). ii, 106.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_145" name="note_145" href="#noteref_145">145.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span> ii, 143.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_146" name="note_146" href="#noteref_146">146.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span> ii, 158.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_147" name="note_147" href="#noteref_147">147.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Preface to Roger de Hoveden, iii, p. lxxvii. Girald. Cambr.
+Vita Galfridi (Rolls Series No. 21). iv, 397.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_148" name="note_148" href="#noteref_148">148.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Richard of Devizes, iii, 414. Benedict, ii, 213.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_149" name="note_149" href="#noteref_149">149.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Ralph de Diceto (Rolls Series No. 68), ii, 99. Girald. Cambr.
+(Vita Galfridi). iv, 397-398. Roger de Hoveden, iii. 140.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_150" name="note_150" href="#noteref_150">150.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Richard of Devizes. (Rolls Series No. 82), iii. 415. Benedict,
+213. Girald. Cambr. (Vita Galfridi), iv, 405.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_151" name="note_151" href="#noteref_151">151.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">"Johannes comes frater regis et archiepiscopus Rothomagensis,
+et omnes episcopi, comites et barones regni qui aderant, concesserunt
+civibus Lundoniarum communam suam, et juraverunt quod ipsi eam et
+dignitates civitatis Lundoniarum custodirent illibatas, quandiu regi
+placuerit. Et cives Lundoniarum et epispcopi et comites et barones
+juraverunt fidelitates regi Ricardo, et Johanni comiti de Meretone fratri
+ejus salva fidelitate, et quod illum in dominum suum et regem reciperent,
+si rex sine prole decesserit."—Benedict of Peterborough
+(Rolls Series No. 49), ii, 214. <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Cf.</span></span> Roger de Hovedene (Rolls Series
+No. 51), iii, 141; Walter de Coventry (Rolls Series No. 58), ii, 5-6.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_152" name="note_152" href="#noteref_152">152.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Supra</span></span> p. 49.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_153" name="note_153" href="#noteref_153">153.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">"In crastino vero convocatis in unum civibus, communione, vel
+ut Latine minus vulgariter magis loquamur, communa seu communia
+eis concessa et communiter jurata."—Vita Galfridi, iv, 405.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_154" name="note_154" href="#noteref_154">154.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Const. Hist., i, 407.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_155" name="note_155" href="#noteref_155">155.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Referring to the year 1191, he writes, "we have the date of the
+foundation of the commune."—<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, i, 629.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_156" name="note_156" href="#noteref_156">156.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">"Concessa est ipsa die et instituta communia Londoniensium, in
+quam universi regni magnates et ipsi etiam ipsius provinciæ episcopi
+jurare coguntur. Nunc primum in indulta sibi conjuratione regno
+regem deesse cognovit Londonia quam nec rex ipse Ricardus, nec
+prædecessor et pater ejus Henricus, pro mille millibus marcarum
+argenti fieri permisisset. Quanta quippe mala ex conjuratione proveniant
+ex ipsa poterit diffinitione perpendi, quæ talis est—communia
+tumor plebis, timor regni, tepor sacerdotii."—Chron. Stephen, Hen.
+II, Ric. I (Rolls Series No. 82), iii, 416.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_157" name="note_157" href="#noteref_157">157.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">"It is impossible to avoid a suspicion," writes Bishop Stubbs,
+"that the disappearance of the port-reeve and other changes in the
+municipal government, signify a civic revolution, the history of which
+is lost."—Const. Hist., i, 406n.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_158" name="note_158" href="#noteref_158">158.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Merewether and Stephens, Hist. of Boroughs (1835), i, 384.
+No authority, however, is given for this statement.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_159" name="note_159" href="#noteref_159">159.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The entire MS. was published in Latin by the Camden Society
+in 1846; and a translation of the original portion of the work was
+afterwards made by the late Mr. H. T. Riley, under the title "Chronicles
+of the Mayors and Sheriffs of London, <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-variant: small-caps">A.D.</span></span> 1188 to <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-variant: small-caps">A.D.</span></span> 1274."</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_160" name="note_160" href="#noteref_160">160.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">"The correct date of the accession of Richard has never been
+ascertained. No records appear to be extant to fix the commencement
+of the reign of any king before the accession of John."—Nicholas,
+Chronology of Hist., p. 285.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_161" name="note_161" href="#noteref_161">161.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Fos. 45, 63 and 63b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_162" name="note_162" href="#noteref_162">162.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Or simply Thedmar.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_163" name="note_163" href="#noteref_163">163.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">It is thus that Riley reads the word which to me appears to be
+capable of being read "Grennigge."</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_164" name="note_164" href="#noteref_164">164.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Calendar of Wills. Court of Husting, London, part. I., p. 22.
+From another Will, that of Margery, relict of Walter de Wynton, and
+one of Fitz-Thedmar's sisters—she is described as daughter of
+"Thedmar, the Teutonic"—it appears that other sisters of Fitz-Thedmar
+married into the well-known city families of Eswy and Gisors.—<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>,
+part i, p. 31.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_165" name="note_165" href="#noteref_165">165.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">"Ibi etiam dispositium est, penes quem pecunia collata debeat
+residere: scilicet sub custodia Huberti Walteri Cantuariensis electi, et
+domini Ricardi Lundoniensis episcopi, et Willelmi comitis de Arundel
+et Hamelini comitis de Warenna et majoris Lundoniarum."—Roger
+de Hoveden (Rolls Series No. 51), iii, 212.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_166" name="note_166" href="#noteref_166">166.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Preserved at the Guildhall.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_167" name="note_167" href="#noteref_167">167.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Ralph de Diceto (Rolls Series No. 68), ii, p. 114.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_168" name="note_168" href="#noteref_168">168.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">"Denique ad ingressum principis ita ornata est facies amplissimæ
+civitatis ut Alemanni nobiles qui cum ipso venerant et redemptione
+regia exinanitam bonis Angliam credebant opum magnitudine obstupescerent."—William
+of Newburgh (Rolls Series No. 82), i, p. 406.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_169" name="note_169" href="#noteref_169">169.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">"Cives vero Lundonienses servierunt de pincernaria, et cives
+Wintonienses de coquina."—Roger de Hoveden (Rolls Series No.
+51), iii, 12.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_170" name="note_170" href="#noteref_170">170.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Brit. Mus., Harl. MS. 3,504, fo. 248.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_171" name="note_171" href="#noteref_171">171.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">"Si invenissem emptorem Londoniam vendidissem."—Richard of
+Devizes (Rolls Series No. 82), iii, 388.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_172" name="note_172" href="#noteref_172">172.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">"Frequentius enim solito . . imponebantur eis auxilia non modica
+et divites, propriis parcentes marsupiis volebant ut pauperes solverent
+universa."—Roger de Hoveden (Rolls Series No. 51), iv. 5. "Ad
+omne edictum regium divites, propriis fortunis parcentes, pauperibus
+per potentiam omne onus imponerent."—Newburgh, (Rolls Series
+No. 82), ii. 466.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_173" name="note_173" href="#noteref_173">173.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Newburgh, ii., 466.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_174" name="note_174" href="#noteref_174">174.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Mat. Paris, ii, 57. A similar character is given him by
+Roger de Hoveden. Dr. S. R. Gardiner describes him as an
+alderman of the city, and as advocating the cause of the poor artisan
+against the exactions of the wealthier traders.—Students' History of
+England, i, 169.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_175" name="note_175" href="#noteref_175">175.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">"Pauperum et veritatis ac pietatis adversarii."—Mat. Paris, ii. 57.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_176" name="note_176" href="#noteref_176">176.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Newburgh, ii, 470.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_177" name="note_177" href="#noteref_177">177.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">"And for the time," adds Dr. Gardiner, "the rich tradesmen
+had their way against the poorer artisans."—Students' History of
+England, i, 170.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_178" name="note_178" href="#noteref_178">178.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Chronicles of Mayors and Sheriffs, p. 2.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_179" name="note_179" href="#noteref_179">179.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Freeman, Norman Conquest, v, 709.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_180" name="note_180" href="#noteref_180">180.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Mat. Paris, ii, 143. Roger of Wendover (Rolls Series No. 84),
+ii, 83-87.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_181" name="note_181" href="#noteref_181">181.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span> ii, 146.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_182" name="note_182" href="#noteref_182">182.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span> ii, 153.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_183" name="note_183" href="#noteref_183">183.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Ann. of Bermondsey (Rolls Series No. 36), in, 453.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_184" name="note_184" href="#noteref_184">184.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Mat. Paris, ii, 154-156.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_185" name="note_185" href="#noteref_185">185.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">As to the services and franchises of Fitz-Walter, both in time of
+peace and war, see Lib. Cust., (Rolls Series), part i, pp. 147-151.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_186" name="note_186" href="#noteref_186">186.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Introd. to Lib. Cust, p. lxxvii.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_187" name="note_187" href="#noteref_187">187.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The sword of St. Paul, emblematic possibly of his martyrdom,
+still remains in the City's coat of arms. It has often been mistaken for
+the dagger with which Sir William Walworth is said to have killed
+Wat Tyler.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_188" name="note_188" href="#noteref_188">188.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The story is told in Mr. Riley's Introduction to the Liber Custamarum
+(p. lxxix), on the authority of the Chronicle of Dunmow.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_189" name="note_189" href="#noteref_189">189.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">He is said to have made a similar attempt upon the wife of
+Eustace de Vesci, a leading baron.—(Blackstone, Introd. to Magna
+Carta, pp. 289, 290).</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_190" name="note_190" href="#noteref_190">190.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Mat. Paris, ii, 156. A different complexion, however, is put on
+this event by another chronicler. According to Walter de Coventry
+(Rolls Series, No. 58, ii, 220) the barons made their way into the City
+by stealth, scaling the walls at a time when most of the inhabitants
+were engaged in divine service, and having once gained a footing
+opened all the City gates one after another.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_191" name="note_191" href="#noteref_191">191.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">By charter, date 8th May, 1215, preserved at the Guildhall.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_192" name="note_192" href="#noteref_192">192.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Mat. Paris, ii, 159, 161, 164, 186.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_193" name="note_193" href="#noteref_193">193.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Roger of Wendover (Rolls Series No. 84), ii, 117.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_194" name="note_194" href="#noteref_194">194.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Stubbs, Select Charters, p. 298.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_195" name="note_195" href="#noteref_195">195.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">"Moram autem faciebant barones in civitate Londoniæ per annum
+et amplius cum civibus confœderati, permittentes se nullam pacem
+facturos cum rege nisi assensu utriusque partis."—Annals of Waverley
+(Rolls Series No. 36), ii, 283.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_196" name="note_196" href="#noteref_196">196.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Mat. Paris, ii, 161, 165.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_197" name="note_197" href="#noteref_197">197.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Contin. Flor. Wigorn. ii, 167, 171. Chron. of Mayors and
+Sheriffs, p. 3.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_198" name="note_198" href="#noteref_198">198.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Mat. Paris, ii, p. 179.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_199" name="note_199" href="#noteref_199">199.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Confession of the Vicomte de Melun.—Mat. Paris, ii, 187.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_200" name="note_200" href="#noteref_200">200.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Mat. Paris, ii, 200.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_201" name="note_201" href="#noteref_201">201.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Chron. of Mayors and Sheriffs, p. 4.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_202" name="note_202" href="#noteref_202">202.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Strype, Stow's Survey, 1720, Bk. i, p. 62. They had settled
+in Holborn soon after their arrival in 1220.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_203" name="note_203" href="#noteref_203">203.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Mat. Paris, ii, 385.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_204" name="note_204" href="#noteref_204">204.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, ii, 218, 220.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_205" name="note_205" href="#noteref_205">205.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Liber de Ant. fol. 38. According to this authority (fol. 38b),
+the peace was ratified 23rd September, at Merton.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_206" name="note_206" href="#noteref_206">206.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Mat. Paris, ii, 222.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_207" name="note_207" href="#noteref_207">207.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Often spoken of as the Treaty of
+Lambeth (Rymer's Fœdera, i, 148.)</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_208" name="note_208" href="#noteref_208">208.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The sum mentioned by Matthew Paris (ii. 224) is £5,000 sterling,
+but according to a marginal note in the Liber de Ant. (fol. 39) it
+would appear to have been only £1,000, which, according to the compiler
+of that record, Louis repaid the Londoners as soon as he arrived
+home, out of pure generosity (<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">mera liberalitate sua</span></span>). On the other
+hand, Matthew Paris (ii, 292) under the year 1227, narrates that Henry
+extorted from the citizens of London 5,000 marks of silver, on the
+ground that that was the sum paid by the Londoners to Louis on his
+departure, to the king's prejudice.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_209" name="note_209" href="#noteref_209">209.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Walter of Coventry. (Rolls Series No. 58), ii, 239.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_210" name="note_210" href="#noteref_210">210.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Mat. Paris, ii, 251, 252.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_211" name="note_211" href="#noteref_211">211.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Roger of Wendover, (Rolls Series No. 84), ii, 265, 267.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_212" name="note_212" href="#noteref_212">212.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Probably Saint Giles in the Fields, a hospital founded by Matilda,
+wife of Henry I.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_213" name="note_213" href="#noteref_213">213.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">"Cives autem Londonienses, qui eundem H[ubertum] propter suspendium
+Constantini oderant, lætati sunt de tribulalionibus suis, et
+ilico conquesti sunt de eo, quod concivem suum injuste suspendit, et
+absque judicio."—Mat. Paris, ii, 345.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_214" name="note_214" href="#noteref_214">214.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, ii, 346, 347. Chron. of Mayors and Sheriffs, pp. 6, 7.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_215" name="note_215" href="#noteref_215">215.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">"Dicebabur enim ... quod alienigenæ qui plus regni perturbationem
+desiderabant quam pacem, præfatum comitem Cestriæ ad
+domini sui regis infestationem et regni inquietationem inducere conarentur."—Walter
+of Coventry, ii, 251.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_216" name="note_216" href="#noteref_216">216.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Mat. Paris, ii, 382, 384, iii, 90.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_217" name="note_217" href="#noteref_217">217.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Freeman, Norman Conquest, v, 469, 470. "Et quia communitas
+nostra sigillum non habet, præsentes literas signo communitatis
+civitatis Londoniarum vestræ sanctitati mittimus consignatas."—Mat.
+Paris, iii, 17.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_218" name="note_218" href="#noteref_218">218.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Chron. of Mayors and Sheriffs, pp. 7, 8.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_219" name="note_219" href="#noteref_219">219.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">French Chronicle (Camden Soc., No. 28), ed. by Aungier (Riley's
+translation), pp. 241-244.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_220" name="note_220" href="#noteref_220">220.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Chron. of Mayors and Sheriffs, p. 11.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_221" name="note_221" href="#noteref_221">221.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, pp. 13, 14, 16.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_222" name="note_222" href="#noteref_222">222.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Chron. of Mayors and Sheriffs, pp. 16, 17, 61. Mat. Paris, iii.,
+62, 80-81.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_223" name="note_223" href="#noteref_223">223.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Mat. Paris, ii, 323.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_224" name="note_224" href="#noteref_224">224.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">"Quia dominus rex obligabatur de debitis non minimis erga
+mercatores de vino, de cera, de pannis ultramarinis, a civibus pecuniam
+multam extorsit et Judæis, nec tamen inde mercatores plenam pacationem
+receperunt."—Mat. Paris, ii, 496.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_225" name="note_225" href="#noteref_225">225.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">"Cives tanien videntes aliud sibi non expedire, omnia benigne
+remiserunt."—Mat. Paris, iii, 72.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_226" name="note_226" href="#noteref_226">226.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, iii, 43.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_227" name="note_227" href="#noteref_227">227.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Ann. of Worcester (Rolls Series No. 36), iv., 407.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_228" name="note_228" href="#noteref_228">228.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">"Unde, ne exorta contentione lætitia nuptialis nubilaretur, salvo
+cujuslibet jure, multa ad horam perpessa sunt, quæ in tempore
+opportuno fuerant determinanda."—Mat. Paris, Hist. Angl., ed. 1684,
+P. 355. <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Cf.</span></span> City Records, Liber Ordinationum, fo. 193 b. Brit. Mus.
+Cotton MS. Vespasian, C. xiv. fos. 113-114.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_229" name="note_229" href="#noteref_229">229.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Chron. of Mayors and Sheriffs, pp. 9, 20, 45, 53.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_230" name="note_230" href="#noteref_230">230.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, p. 21.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_231" name="note_231" href="#noteref_231">231.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">An early instance of this parliament being so designated is found
+in the <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Liber de Antiquis</span></span> of the City's Records (fol. 75b.) where the
+words <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">insane parliamentum</span></span> occur.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_232" name="note_232" href="#noteref_232">232.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">This agreement between the king and barons is termed a "Charter"
+by Fitz-Thedmar, who says it bore the seals of the king and of many
+barons.—Chron. of Mayors and Sheriffs, p. 41.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_233" name="note_233" href="#noteref_233">233.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Chron. of Mayors and Sheriffs, p. 43.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_234" name="note_234" href="#noteref_234">234.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, pp. 33-39.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_235" name="note_235" href="#noteref_235">235.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, pp. 45, 46.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_236" name="note_236" href="#noteref_236">236.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Chron. of Mayors and Sheriffs, p. 47.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_237" name="note_237" href="#noteref_237">237.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, p. 52.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_238" name="note_238" href="#noteref_238">238.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The Bull was confirmed by Alexander's successor Pope Urban IV.
+and the later Bull was read at Paul's Cross, by the king's orders in the
+following year (1262), <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, p. 53.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_239" name="note_239" href="#noteref_239">239.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Chron. of Mayors and Sheriffs, p. 56.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_240" name="note_240" href="#noteref_240">240.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, p. 57.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_241" name="note_241" href="#noteref_241">241.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, p. 58.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_242" name="note_242" href="#noteref_242">242.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Chron. of Mayors and Sheriffs, p. 59. "A similar uprising of
+the middle class of citizens was taking place about this period in other
+towns. They are spoken of by chroniclers of the same stamp as Fitz-Thedmar
+as ribald men who proclaimed themselves 'bachelors,' and
+banded themselves together to the prejudice of the chief men of the
+towns (<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">majores urbium et burgorum</span></span>)"—Chron. of Thomas Wykes
+(Rolls Series No. 36), iv, 138.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_243" name="note_243" href="#noteref_243">243.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Chron. of Mayors and Sheriffs, pp. 59-60.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_244" name="note_244" href="#noteref_244">244.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, p. 60.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_245" name="note_245" href="#noteref_245">245.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Ann. of Dunstaple (Rolls Series No. 36). iii. 222-223. Chron.
+of Thos. Wykes (<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Ibid</span></span>) iv, 136. Rishanger (Rolls Series No. 28, ii, 18),
+places this event after the Mise of Amiens (23rd Jan., 1264).</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_246" name="note_246" href="#noteref_246">246.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Annales Londonienses.—Chron. Edward I and II (Rolls Series
+No. 76) i, 60.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_247" name="note_247" href="#noteref_247">247.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Chron. of Mayors and Sheriffs, p. 62.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_248" name="note_248" href="#noteref_248">248.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, pp. 64, 65.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_249" name="note_249" href="#noteref_249">249.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Ann. of Dunstaple. iii, 230, 231.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_250" name="note_250" href="#noteref_250">250.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The number of Londoners who accompanied Leicester to Lewes
+is not given. Thomas Wykes mentions it to have been very large,
+for the reason that the number of fools is said to be infinite!
+"Quo comperto comes Leycestriæ glorians in virtute sua, congregata
+baronum multitudine copiosa, Londoniensium innumerabili agmine
+circumcinctus, quia legitur stultorum infinitus est numerus."—(Rolls
+Series No. 36), iv, 148.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_251" name="note_251" href="#noteref_251">251.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Chron. of Mayors and Sheriffs, p. 66; Ann. of Dunstaple, iii, 232;
+Thos. Wykes, iv, 149, 150; Rishanger (Rolls Series No. 28), 27.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_252" name="note_252" href="#noteref_252">252.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Chron. of Mayors and Sheriffs, p. 67.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_253" name="note_253" href="#noteref_253">253.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, p. 74.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_254" name="note_254" href="#noteref_254">254.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Fitz-Thedmar gives the number of representatives of each city
+and borough as four: "De qualitet civitate et burgo iiii homines."—Chron.
+of Mayors and Sheriffs, p. 75.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_255" name="note_255" href="#noteref_255">255.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Chron. of Mayors and Sheriffs, p. 77. This anecdote is inserted
+in the margin of Fitz-Thedmar's chronicle, the writer expressing his
+horror at the "wondrous and unheard of" conduct of "this most
+wretched mayor."</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_256" name="note_256" href="#noteref_256">256.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The story is told by Thos. Wykes. (Rolls Series No. 36), iv, 163.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_257" name="note_257" href="#noteref_257">257.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Lib. de. Ant. fo. 94b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_258" name="note_258" href="#noteref_258">258.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Chron. of Mayors and Sheriffs, p. 119. Circumstantially as the
+chronicler relates the story, he appears only to have inserted it as an
+after-thought. Mr. Loftie (Hist, of London, i, 151), suggests that
+possibly the news of Fitz-Thomas' death might have been the occasion
+of its insertion.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_259" name="note_259" href="#noteref_259">259.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Aungier, Fr. Chron. (Riley's Transl.), p. 235.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_260" name="note_260" href="#noteref_260">260.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">"His lordship the king had summoned to Wyndleshores all the
+earls, barons, [and] knights, as many as he could, with horses and arms,
+intending to lay siege to the City of London [and] calling the citizens
+his foes."—Chron. of Mayors and Sheriffs, p. 81.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_261" name="note_261" href="#noteref_261">261.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Chron. of Mayors and Sheriffs, p. 82.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_262" name="note_262" href="#noteref_262">262.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">At one time the parish of All Hallows Barking is spoken of as
+being in the County of Middlesex, at another as being within the City—Hust.
+Roll. 274, (10), (12).</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_263" name="note_263" href="#noteref_263">263.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">In narrating this, Fitz-Thedmar again discloses his aristocratic
+proclivities by remarking, "Such base exclamations did the fools of the
+vulgar classes give utterance to" on this occasion, viz., the election of
+William Fitz-Richard as Sheriff of Middlesex and Warden of London.—Chron.
+of Mayors and Sheriffs, pp. 90, 91.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_264" name="note_264" href="#noteref_264">264.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Chron. of Mayors and Sheriffs, pp. 83, 85.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_265" name="note_265" href="#noteref_265">265.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">"Regina etiam rogavit pro Londoniensibus de quibus rex plures
+recepit ad pacem suam."—Ann. of Winchester (Rolls Series, No. 36),
+ii, 103.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_266" name="note_266" href="#noteref_266">266.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Chron. of Mayors and Sheriffs, pp. 146, 147.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_267" name="note_267" href="#noteref_267">267.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Ann. of Dunstaple. (Rolls Series, No. 36), iii, 245.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_268" name="note_268" href="#noteref_268">268.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Chron. of Mayors and Sheriffs, p. 95. The citizens appear
+to have been divided, as indeed they often were, on the question of
+admitting the Earl.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_269" name="note_269" href="#noteref_269">269.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Chron. of Mayors and Sheriffs, pp. 95, 97.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_270" name="note_270" href="#noteref_270">270.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Chron. of Mayors and Sheriffs, p. 96.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_271" name="note_271" href="#noteref_271">271.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, pp. 97, 100.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_272" name="note_272" href="#noteref_272">272.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Dated "Est Ratford," 16th June, 1267. Chron. of Mayors and
+Sheriffs, pp. 98-100.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_273" name="note_273" href="#noteref_273">273.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Dated 26th March, 1268. The original is preserved at the
+Guildhall (Box No. 3). A copy of it, inserted in the Lib. de Ant.
+(fo. 108b), has the following heading:—"Carta domini regis quam
+fecit civibus Lond', <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">sub spe inveniendi ab eo meliorem gratiam</span></span>," the
+words in italics being added by a later hand.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_274" name="note_274" href="#noteref_274">274.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Chron. of Mayors and Sheriffs, p. 113. Ann. of Waverley (Rolls
+Series No. 36), ii, 375.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_275" name="note_275" href="#noteref_275">275.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Chron. of Mayors and Sheriffs, p. 129.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_276" name="note_276" href="#noteref_276">276.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Lib. de Ant., fo. 120.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_277" name="note_277" href="#noteref_277">277.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Chron. of Mayors and Sheriffs, pp. 129-130.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_278" name="note_278" href="#noteref_278">278.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Chron. of Mayors and Sheriffs, p. 153.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_279" name="note_279" href="#noteref_279">279.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Chron. of Mayors and Sheriffs, pp. 154, 159.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_280" name="note_280" href="#noteref_280">280.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Chron. of Mayors and Sheriffs, p. 164.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_281" name="note_281" href="#noteref_281">281.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The series of Husting Rolls for Pleas of Land, preserved at the
+Guildhall, commence in the mayoralty of Hervy's successor.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_282" name="note_282" href="#noteref_282">282.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Chron. of Mayors and Sheriffs, pp. 205-208.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_283" name="note_283" href="#noteref_283">283.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">What Fitz-Thedmar means when he says (Chron. of Mayors and
+Sheriffs, p. 171), that "only one part of the seal of the Commonalty
+of London" was appended to Hervy's so-called "charter" is hard to
+determine. The common seal of the city was at this period in the
+custody of the mayor for the time being. Under Edward II, it was for
+the first time entrusted to two aldermen and two commoners for safe
+keeping.—City Records, Letter Book D, fo. 145b. <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Cf.</span></span> Ordinances
+of Edward II, <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-variant: small-caps">A.D.</span></span> 1319.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_284" name="note_284" href="#noteref_284">284.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Chron. of Mayors and Sheriffs, pp. 169-171.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_285" name="note_285" href="#noteref_285">285.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Chron. of Mayors and Sheriffs, pp. 173-5.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_286" name="note_286" href="#noteref_286">286.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">"Et quod nullus alienigena in libertatem civitatis prædictæ
+admittatur nisi in Hustengo ... et si non sint de certo mestero,
+tune in libertatem civitatis ejusdem non admittentur sine assensu communitatis
+civitatis illius."—Lib. Custumarum (Rolls Series), pt. 1,
+pp. 269-270.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_287" name="note_287" href="#noteref_287">287.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">"The establishment of the corporate character of the city under
+a mayor marks the victory of the communal principle over the more
+ancient shire organisation, which seems to have displaced early in the
+century the complicated system of guild and franchise. It also marks
+the triumph of the mercantile over the aristocratic element."—Stubbs,
+Const. Hist., i, 630, 631.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_288" name="note_288" href="#noteref_288">288.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">"The guilds continued to elect until 1384, when the right of
+election was again transferred to the wards." City Records, Letter
+Book H, fos. 46b, 173.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_289" name="note_289" href="#noteref_289">289.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Chron. Edward I and II. (Rolls Series No. 76), i, 84. Chron.
+of T. Wykes (Rolls Series No. 36) iv, p. 259.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_290" name="note_290" href="#noteref_290">290.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Dated from "Caples in the land of Labour" (<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Caples in terra
+laboris</span></span>) or Capua, 19th January, 1273. This letter was publicly read
+in the Guildhall on the 25th March following.—Chron. of Mayors and
+Sheriffs, p. 163.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_291" name="note_291" href="#noteref_291">291.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Chron. of Mayors and Sheriffs, p. 161.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_292" name="note_292" href="#noteref_292">292.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, p. 172.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_293" name="note_293" href="#noteref_293">293.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">.Id</span></span>, pp. 132, 140-2.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_294" name="note_294" href="#noteref_294">294.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Chron. of Mayors and Sheriffs, pp. 143-4.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_295" name="note_295" href="#noteref_295">295.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, pp. 145, 146.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_296" name="note_296" href="#noteref_296">296.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Chron. of Mayors and Sheriffs, pp. 147, 148.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_297" name="note_297" href="#noteref_297">297.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Chron. of Mayors and Sheriffs, pp. 149, 150.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_298" name="note_298" href="#noteref_298">298.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, p. 165.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_299" name="note_299" href="#noteref_299">299.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-variant: small-caps">A.D.</span></span> 1279. "Eodem anno escambia et novæ monetæ extiterunt
+levata apud turrim Londoniensem; et Gregorius de Roqesle major
+monetæ per totam Angliam."—Chron. Edw. I and II. (Rolls Series
+No. 76. i. 88).—Aungier Fr. Chron. (Transl.) p. 239.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_300" name="note_300" href="#noteref_300">300.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The name of John Horn with the addition. "Flemyng" occurs in
+the 14th cent.—Hust. Roll. 64 (67), 81 (74).</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_301" name="note_301" href="#noteref_301">301.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">For one month after the Feast of St. Botolph the Abbot [17 June],
+the Court of Husting in London was closed, owing to the absence of
+citizens attending the fair. The right of appointing their own officers to
+settle disputes arising at the fair was granted to the citizens of London at
+the close of the Barons' War.—Chron. of Mayors and Sheriffs, p. 176.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_302" name="note_302" href="#noteref_302">302.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Peace was signed before the end of July.—Rymer's Fœdera,
+(ed. 1816), vol. i. pt. 2, p. 513.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_303" name="note_303" href="#noteref_303">303.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">A series of MS. books extending from <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-variant: small-caps">a.d.</span></span> 1275 to 1688,
+deriving their title from the letters of the alphabet with which they are
+distinguished, <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-variant: small-caps">A, B, C,</span></span> &amp;c, <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-variant: small-caps">AA, BB, CC,</span></span> &amp;c. We are further aided by
+chronicles of the reigns of Edward I and II, edited by Bishop Stubbs
+for the Master of the Rolls. A portion of these chronicles the editor
+has fitly called "Annales Londonienses." There is even reason for
+believing them to have been written by Andrew Horn, citizen and
+fishmonger, as well as eminent jurist of his day. He died soon after
+the accession of Edward III. and by his will, dated 9th Oct., 1328,
+(Cal. of Wills, Court of Husting, i, 344) bequeathed to the city many
+valuable legal and other treatises, only one of which (known to this
+day as "Liber Horn,") is preserved among the archives of the
+Corporation.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_304" name="note_304" href="#noteref_304">304.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Chron. of Mayors and Sheriffs, p. 239.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_305" name="note_305" href="#noteref_305">305.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Stubbs, Select Charters, p. 447.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_306" name="note_306" href="#noteref_306">306.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Chron. Edward I and II, (Rolls Series). Introd. vol. i, p. xxxiii.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_307" name="note_307" href="#noteref_307">307.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, i, 92.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_308" name="note_308" href="#noteref_308">308.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Contin. Flor. Wigorn., ii, 229. 230. Tho. Wykes (Ann. Monast.
+Rolls Series No. 36), iv, 294. Ann. of Worcester (<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Ibid</span></span>), iv, 486.
+Walter de Heminburgh (Eng. Hist. Soc.), ii, 13.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_309" name="note_309" href="#noteref_309">309.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">They were, in the language of Stow, "hanged by the purse."
+(Survey, Thoms' ed., p. 96). <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Cf.</span></span> "He was hanged by the nek and
+nought by the purs." (Chaucer, Cook's Tale. l. 885). The story is recorded
+in Aungier's French Chron. (Riley's translation), p. 240; and
+in Chron. Edward I and II (Rolls Series i, 92-93).</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_310" name="note_310" href="#noteref_310">310.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Stubbs, Select Charters, pp. 472-474.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_311" name="note_311" href="#noteref_311">311.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book C, fo. 52. Riley's Memorials, p. 21.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_312" name="note_312" href="#noteref_312">312.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Rolls Series, i, 51-60. <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Cf.</span></span> Lib. Ordinationum, fos. 154b, <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">seq.</span></span></p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_313" name="note_313" href="#noteref_313">313.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The circumstances of Rokesley's visit to the justices at the Tower
+are set out in the city's "Liber Albus" (i, 16), from a MS. of Andrew
+Horn, no longer preserved at the Guildhall. The story also appears
+in Chron. Edward I and II (Rolls Series No. 76), i, 94.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_314" name="note_314" href="#noteref_314">314.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">In 1293 the king appointed Elias Russell and Henry le Bole his
+"improvers" (<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">appropriatores</span></span>) in the city:—Chron. Edward I and II,
+(Rolls Series No. 76, i, 102). Their duties were practically identical
+with those of sheriffs, and Bishop Stubbs places a marginal note over
+against the appointment,—"Sheriffs appointed by the king." Walter
+Hervy is recorded as having removed certain stones near Bucklersbury
+when he was "improver" of the city (Letter Book A, fo. 84.
+Riley's Memorials, p. 25). This was probably done in 1268, when the
+city was in the king's hand, and Hervy and William de Durham were
+appointed bailiffs "without election by the citizens."—Chron. Mayors
+and Sheriffs, pp. 112, 113.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_315" name="note_315" href="#noteref_315">315.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book A, fo. 132b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_316" name="note_316" href="#noteref_316">316.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, fo. 110.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_317" name="note_317" href="#noteref_317">317.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Chron. Edward I and II, i, 98.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_318" name="note_318" href="#noteref_318">318.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book A, fo. 95. Riley's Memorials, p. 26.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_319" name="note_319" href="#noteref_319">319.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">"From the very day of his accession, Edward was financially in
+the hands of the Lombard bankers; hence arose, no doubt, the
+difficulty which he had in managing the City of London; hence came
+also the financial mischief which followed the banishment of the Jews;
+and hence an accumulation of popular discontent, which showed itself
+in the king's lifetime by opposition to his mercantile policy, and, after
+his death, supplied one of the most efficient means for the overthrow
+of his son."—Chron. Edward I and II. Introd. vol. i, pp. c, ci.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_320" name="note_320" href="#noteref_320">320.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Writ to the Sheriff of Middlesex, dated 2nd Jan., 1293. Letter
+Book B, fo. 25. Contin. Flor. Wigorn., ii, 266.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_321" name="note_321" href="#noteref_321">321.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Ann. of Dunstaple (Rolls Series No. 36), iii, 390. The chronicler
+acquits the king of complicity in this sacrilege.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_322" name="note_322" href="#noteref_322">322.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Contin. Flor. Wigorn., ii, 274.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_323" name="note_323" href="#noteref_323">323.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book C. fo. 20.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_324" name="note_324" href="#noteref_324">324.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, fos. 21b, 22. (Riley's Memorials, pp. 31-33). Liber Custum.,
+i, 72-76.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_325" name="note_325" href="#noteref_325">325.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Chron. of Walter de Hemingburgh (Eng. Hist. Soc.), ii. 108, 109.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_326" name="note_326" href="#noteref_326">326.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book C, fo. 22b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_327" name="note_327" href="#noteref_327">327.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">By the bull <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Clericis Laicos</span></span>, Boniface VIII had recently forbidden
+the clergy to pay taxes to any layman.—Chron. of Walter de Hemingburgh
+(Eng. Hist. Soc.), ii, 113-116.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_328" name="note_328" href="#noteref_328">328.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Stubbs, Const. Hist., ii, 130, 131, 134.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_329" name="note_329" href="#noteref_329">329.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Chron. of Walter de Hemingburgh, ii, 121.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_330" name="note_330" href="#noteref_330">330.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, ii, 126, 127.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_331" name="note_331" href="#noteref_331">331.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, ii, 149, 151.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_332" name="note_332" href="#noteref_332">332.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book B, fo. xxxvii (101b).</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_333" name="note_333" href="#noteref_333">333.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Preserved among the City Archives (Box 26). <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Cf.</span></span> Letter Book
+C, fo. xxiv, b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_334" name="note_334" href="#noteref_334">334.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book B, fo. 93.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_335" name="note_335" href="#noteref_335">335.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book C, fo. 24. (Riley's Memorials, 37).</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_336" name="note_336" href="#noteref_336">336.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Strictly speaking, a talliage could only be charged on the king's
+demesnes, and these did not include the City of London.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_337" name="note_337" href="#noteref_337">337.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Chron. Edward I and II (Rolls Series), i, 132.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_338" name="note_338" href="#noteref_338">338.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Aungier, Fr. Chron. (Riley's Transl.), 247. Chron. Edward I
+and II (Rolls Series), i, 139.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_339" name="note_339" href="#noteref_339">339.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Chron. Edward I and II (Rolls Series), i, 146. Hemingburgh
+ii, 248.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_340" name="note_340" href="#noteref_340">340.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Aungier, Fr. Chron. (Riley's Transl.), 247 n.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_341" name="note_341" href="#noteref_341">341.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">"Tunc visa est Londonia quasi nova Jerusalem monilibus ornata."—Chron.
+Edward I and II (Rolls Series No. 76), i, 152.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_342" name="note_342" href="#noteref_342">342.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">"Ad quam coronationem major, aldermanni et cives Londoniarum
+induti samiteis et sericeis vestimentis et ex armis Angliæ et Franciæ
+depictis, coram rege et regina Karolantes, et servi civium ad illud festum,
+ut moris est, de cupa servientes, omnibus intuentibus inauditum proviserunt
+gaudium."—<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id. ibid.</span></span></p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_343" name="note_343" href="#noteref_343">343.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book C, fo. 93 (Riley's Memorials, p. 64).</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_344" name="note_344" href="#noteref_344">344.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book D, fo. 96 (Memorials, pp. 69-71).</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_345" name="note_345" href="#noteref_345">345.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book C, fo. 97 b (Memorials, p. 69).</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_346" name="note_346" href="#noteref_346">346.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book D, fo. 104 (Memorials, pp. 72-74).</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_347" name="note_347" href="#noteref_347">347.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Chron. of Mayors and Sheriffs, pp. 224-225.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_348" name="note_348" href="#noteref_348">348.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book D, fo. 147b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_349" name="note_349" href="#noteref_349">349.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, fo. 125b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_350" name="note_350" href="#noteref_350">350.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">"Eodem anno (<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">i.e.</span></span> 1302), die Lunæ iv<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="vertical-align: super">to</span></span> Kalendas Februarii,
+restitutus est Richerus de Refham in honore aldermanniæ Londoniarum,
+et factus est aldermannus de Warda de Basseishawe."—Chron. Edward
+I and II, i, 104.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_351" name="note_351" href="#noteref_351">351.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Among those who were called to account was a woman remarkable
+for her name—"Sarra la Bredmongesterre." A selection of the cases
+enquired into is printed in Riley's Memorials, pp. 86-89.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_352" name="note_352" href="#noteref_352">352.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">"Sed quia idem Richerus fuerat austerus et celer ad justitiam
+faciendam nulli parcendo, et quia fecit imprisonare Willelmum de
+Hakford, mercer, ideo dictus W, et sui complices insurrexerunt in ipsum
+et ideo depositus fuit ab officio majoris et postea aldermanniæ suæ."—Chron.
+Edw. I and II, i, 175-176.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_353" name="note_353" href="#noteref_353">353.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book D, fo. 142.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_354" name="note_354" href="#noteref_354">354.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, fos. 142b-143b (Memorials pp.
+93-98.)</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_355" name="note_355" href="#noteref_355">355.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, fos. 142b, 143b, 145b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_356" name="note_356" href="#noteref_356">356.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Chron. Edward I and II. i, 203.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_357" name="note_357" href="#noteref_357">357.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Lib. de Antiq., fo. 43b. Aungier's Fr. Chron. (Riley's Transl.),
+p. 250.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_358" name="note_358" href="#noteref_358">358.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book C, fo. 45.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_359" name="note_359" href="#noteref_359">359.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book C, fo. 92b (Memorials p. 63).</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_360" name="note_360" href="#noteref_360">360.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The city chose as its representatives, Nicholas de Farendone, John
+de Wengrave, and Robert de Kelleseye. Letter Book D. fos. 149b,
+151, 151b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_361" name="note_361" href="#noteref_361">361.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, fos. 151b, 152 (Memorials pp. 102-104.)</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_362" name="note_362" href="#noteref_362">362.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, fo. 168 (Memorials, pp. 105-106).</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_363" name="note_363" href="#noteref_363">363.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book D, fos. 164, 164b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_364" name="note_364" href="#noteref_364">364.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book E, fo. 18. (Memorials, pp. 108-110).</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_365" name="note_365" href="#noteref_365">365.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book D, fo. 165.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_366" name="note_366" href="#noteref_366">366.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Chron. Edward I and II, ii, 55, 56.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_367" name="note_367" href="#noteref_367">367.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book E, fo. 84. (Memorials, pp. 128-129).</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_368" name="note_368" href="#noteref_368">368.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Chron. Edward I and II, i, 285.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_369" name="note_369" href="#noteref_369">369.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Aungier's French Chron. (Riley's translation), p. 252.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_370" name="note_370" href="#noteref_370">370.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Lib. Cust. (Rolls Series) i, 269.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_371" name="note_371" href="#noteref_371">371.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Dated York, 8th June, 1319. These letters patent are preserved
+at the Guildhall (Box No. 4). Ten days later [18th June] Edward
+granted an ample inspeximus charter to the city, the original of which
+does not appear among the archives. <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">See</span></span> Lib. Cust. i, pp. 255-273.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_372" name="note_372" href="#noteref_372">372.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Aungier, Fr. Chron. (Riley's translation), p. 253.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_373" name="note_373" href="#noteref_373">373.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">In this year [1318-19] the new charter was confirmed by the
+king, and cost £1,000. <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, p. 252.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_374" name="note_374" href="#noteref_374">374.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Chron. Edward I and II, Introd., vol. ii, p. lxxxiv.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_375" name="note_375" href="#noteref_375">375.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Lib. Cust. (Rolls Series) i, 285-432.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_376" name="note_376" href="#noteref_376">376.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Rolls Series i, 51-60. Copies of the Ordinances are also to be
+found in the Liber Horn (fos. 209, <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">seq.</span></span>) and Liber Ordinationum (fos.
+154b <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">seq.</span></span>) of the city's archives.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_377" name="note_377" href="#noteref_377">377.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Lib. Cust. i, 289, 308.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_378" name="note_378" href="#noteref_378">378.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Lib. Cust., i, 296.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_379" name="note_379" href="#noteref_379">379.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, i, 308-322.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_380" name="note_380" href="#noteref_380">380.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, i, 322-324.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_381" name="note_381" href="#noteref_381">381.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, i, 324-325.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_382" name="note_382" href="#noteref_382">382.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, i, 347-362.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_383" name="note_383" href="#noteref_383">383.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">"Et fuit illo die post horam vesperarum antequam Justiciarii et
+duodenæ perfiniebant; sed neminem eodem die indictaverunt."—Lib.
+Cust., i, 366.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_384" name="note_384" href="#noteref_384">384.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Lib. Cust., i, 371-374.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_385" name="note_385" href="#noteref_385">385.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, i, 378. Chron. Edward I and
+II, i, 291. Aungier, Fr. Chron., p. 253.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_386" name="note_386" href="#noteref_386">386.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">"Qui cum quasi leones parati ad prædam ante Pascham extitissent,
+nunc, versa vice, quasi agni vicissim facti sunt."—Lib. Cust., i,
+383-384.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_387" name="note_387" href="#noteref_387">387.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Chron. Edward I and II. i, 216, 272.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_388" name="note_388" href="#noteref_388">388.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Lib. Cust., i, 408, 409.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_389" name="note_389" href="#noteref_389">389.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, i, 425.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_390" name="note_390" href="#noteref_390">390.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Chron. Edward I and II, i, 291. The precise date of his election
+is not known. Bishop Stubbs, in his introduction to the Chronicle
+cited (i, p. lxxxii), states it to have taken place in January. This can
+hardly have been the case, inasmuch as the city had not been taken
+into the king's hands before the middle of February—forty-one days
+after the commencement of the Iter. See Lib. Cust. i, p. 378.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_391" name="note_391" href="#noteref_391">391.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book E, fos. 119b-120 (Memorials, pp. 142-144).</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_392" name="note_392" href="#noteref_392">392.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Chron. Edward I and II, i, 293, 296.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_393" name="note_393" href="#noteref_393">393.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, i, 297.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_394" name="note_394" href="#noteref_394">394.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Dated, Boxle, 25 October. Patent Roll 15, Edward II, Part 1,
+m. ii.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_395" name="note_395" href="#noteref_395">395.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Chron. Edward I and II, i, p. 298. Re-elected "by the commons
+at the king's wish."—Aungier Fr. Chron. (Riley's transl.), p. 254.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_396" name="note_396" href="#noteref_396">396.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Chron. Edward I and II, i, pp. 298-299.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_397" name="note_397" href="#noteref_397">397.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Aungier, Fr. Chron., pp. 254, 255.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_398" name="note_398" href="#noteref_398">398.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The charter, dated Aldermaston, 12th December, 15 Edward II
+[<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-variant: small-caps">A.D.</span></span> 1321], with seal (imperfect) attached, is preserved at the Guildhall
+(Box No. 4.)</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_399" name="note_399" href="#noteref_399">399.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Chron. Edward I and II, i, 301.—Aungier. Fr. Chron. (Riley's
+transl.). p. 255.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_400" name="note_400" href="#noteref_400">400.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">"Car c'est le plus perilleux peuple [sc. the English] qui soit au
+monde et plus outrageux et orgueilleux et de tous ceux d' Angleterre les
+Londriens sont chefs ... ils sont fors durs et hardis et haux en
+courage; tant plus voyent de sang respandu et plus sont cruels et moins
+ebahis."—Froissart's Hist. (ed. Lyon, 1559), pp. 333-334.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_401" name="note_401" href="#noteref_401">401.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Macaulay, Hist., cap. iii.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_402" name="note_402" href="#noteref_402">402.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Aungier. Fr. Chron. (Riley's transl.), pp. 257, 264.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_403" name="note_403" href="#noteref_403">403.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Chron. Edward I and II. i, 303.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_404" name="note_404" href="#noteref_404">404.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, i. 305. Aungier. Fr. Chron. (Riley's transl.), p. 257.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_405" name="note_405" href="#noteref_405">405.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">By the king's writ, dated Ravensdale, 29 Nov., Letter Book E.
+fo. 148. According to the French Chronicle (Aungier, p. 258) Chigwell
+recovered the mayoralty on the feast of St. Nicholas [6 Dec.].
+On the 7th Dec. he was admitted and sworn into office.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_406" name="note_406" href="#noteref_406">406.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Chron. Edward I and II, i, 301, 305, 318 n.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_407" name="note_407" href="#noteref_407">407.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">"Propter insidiantes domini regis et aliorum malorum hominum."—<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>,
+i, 306.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_408" name="note_408" href="#noteref_408">408.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, i, 307.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_409" name="note_409" href="#noteref_409">409.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Aungier, Fr. Chron., p. 259.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_410" name="note_410" href="#noteref_410">410.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Chron. Edward I and II, i, 308. Easter is given as the date of
+her departure by the Fr. Chron. (p. 259), Easter Day falling on the
+15th April in that year.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_411" name="note_411" href="#noteref_411">411.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Aungier, Fr. Chron. (Riley's transl.), p. 260.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_412" name="note_412" href="#noteref_412">412.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">See her proclamation issued at Wallingford, 15th Oct. Rymer's
+Fœdera, vol. ii, part 1, pp. 645, 646.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_413" name="note_413" href="#noteref_413">413.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Chron. Edward I and II, i, 314, 315.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_414" name="note_414" href="#noteref_414">414.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Dated Baldock, 6 Oct., 1326. City's Records, Pleas and
+Memoranda, Roll A I, membr. x (12).</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_415" name="note_415" href="#noteref_415">415.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Aungier. Fr. Chron. (Riley's translation), pp. 262, 263.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_416" name="note_416" href="#noteref_416">416.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Chron. Edward I and II, i, 315, 316. Aungier, Fr. Chron., p. 263.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_417" name="note_417" href="#noteref_417">417.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Chron. Edward I and II, ii, 310. Murimuth, Chron. (Eng. Hist.
+Soc.), p. 48.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_418" name="note_418" href="#noteref_418">418.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Chron. Edward I and II, i, 321, ii, 310. Aungier, Fr. Chron.
+(Riley's translation), p. 264. Murimuth (Eng. Hist. Soc.), pp. 48, 49.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_419" name="note_419" href="#noteref_419">419.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The proclamation is headed, <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Proclamacio prima post decessum
+episcopi Exoniensis et ipsius decollacionem.</span></span>—City's Records, Pleas and
+Memoranda, Roll A 1, membr. 2 dors.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_420" name="note_420" href="#noteref_420">420.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Aungier, Fr. Chron., p. 265.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_421" name="note_421" href="#noteref_421">421.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Chron. Edward I and II, i, 318.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_422" name="note_422" href="#noteref_422">422.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Chron. Edward I and II, i, 323. Pleas and Memoranda, Roll
+A 1, memb. 2.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_423" name="note_423" href="#noteref_423">423.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Dated 28 February, 1326-7. Chron. Edward I and II, i,
+325-326.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_424" name="note_424" href="#noteref_424">424.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Dated 6 March, 1326-7. Preserved at the Guildhall (Box No. 5).</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_425" name="note_425" href="#noteref_425">425.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">In <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">re</span></span> Islington Market Bill, 3 Clk, 513. See also Stat. 5 and 6,
+William IV, cap. cxi, ss. 46 <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">et seq.</span></span></p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_426" name="note_426" href="#noteref_426">426.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Vide sup.</span></span>, p. 104.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_427" name="note_427" href="#noteref_427">427.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">According to the common law of the land, no market could be
+erected so as to be a "nuisance" to another market within a less distance
+than six miles and a half and a third of another half.—Bracton
+"De Legibus Angliæ" (Rolls Series No. 70), iii, 584.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_428" name="note_428" href="#noteref_428">428.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Dated 4 March, 1326-7.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_429" name="note_429" href="#noteref_429">429.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Chron. Edward I and II, i, 325.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_430" name="note_430" href="#noteref_430">430.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The king's letters asking for assistance were dated from Nottingham,
+29 April and 2 May.—City's Records, Pleas and Mem., Roll A 1,
+membr. iv dors, and ix.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_431" name="note_431" href="#noteref_431">431.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The names of the troopers are set out in full, under the several
+wards, in Pleas and Memoranda, Roll A I, memb. ix. The compiler
+of the "Annales Paulini" (Chron. Edward I and II, i. 333), gives the
+number of the City contingent as 100 men, adding feelingly "sed proh
+pudor! nil boni ibi facientes sine honore revertuntur."</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_432" name="note_432" href="#noteref_432">432.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Dated Topclyf, 10 July.—Pleas and Mem., Roll A 1, membr.
+ii (4).</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_433" name="note_433" href="#noteref_433">433.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, Roll A 1, membr. iii.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_434" name="note_434" href="#noteref_434">434.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Writ dated Lincoln, 23 September.—<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, Roll A 1, membr. v
+(7) dors.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_435" name="note_435" href="#noteref_435">435.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, Roll A 1. memb. iii.—In July, 1323, the Exchequer had been
+transferred from York to Westminster, "and great treasure therewith."—Aungier's
+Fr. Chron. (Riley's transl.), p. 258.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_436" name="note_436" href="#noteref_436">436.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Pleas and Mem., Roll A 1. membr. iii, and v (7).</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_437" name="note_437" href="#noteref_437">437.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Pleas and Memoranda, Roll A 1. membr. xxii.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_438" name="note_438" href="#noteref_438">438.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, Roll A 1. membr. xxii, dors.—According to the Chronicle of
+Lanercost (Bannatyne Club, p. 261), it was the <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Londoners</span></span> who refused
+to give up the stone.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_439" name="note_439" href="#noteref_439">439.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Rymer's Fœdera (1830), Vol. iii, pt. ii, p. 716. Stanley's
+Memorials of Westminster Abbey (2nd ed.), pp. 60-64.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_440" name="note_440" href="#noteref_440">440.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Rymer's Fœdera (1821) Vol. ii, pt. ii, pp. 734, 740. Pleas
+and Mem., Roll A 1, membr. xx dors. Chron. Edward I and II,
+i. 339-340.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_441" name="note_441" href="#noteref_441">441.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The city was represented by Stephen de Abyndon and Robert de
+Kelseye. The writ was dated Clipston, 28 August, and the return
+made the 10th October.—Pleas and Mem., Roll A 1. membr. xxiii-xxiv.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_442" name="note_442" href="#noteref_442">442.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter dated 27 September.—Pleas and Mem., Roll A 1,
+membr. xxiii (27) dors.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_443" name="note_443" href="#noteref_443">443.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, Roll A 1, membr. xxiv (28) dors.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_444" name="note_444" href="#noteref_444">444.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">"Quod dictus Hamo fuit pessimus vermis qui venit in civitate jam
+xx annis elapsis et amplius, et quod nunquam foret bona pax in civitate
+dum viveret et quod bonum esset valde si capud ejus a corpore truncatur."—Pleas
+and Mem., Roll A 1, membr. xxiii dors.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_445" name="note_445" href="#noteref_445">445.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Pleas and Mem., Roll A 1, membr. 29.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_446" name="note_446" href="#noteref_446">446.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, Roll A 1, membr. 29 dors.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_447" name="note_447" href="#noteref_447">447.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">ibid.</span></span>—Notwithstanding this disavowal,
+it is said that no less than 600 Londoners assisted the Lancastrian
+cause.—Chron. Edward I and II. Introd. Vol. i, p. cxx.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_448" name="note_448" href="#noteref_448">448.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Chron. Edward I and II, i, 343.—Letter Book E, fo. 179b.
+(Memorials, pp. 170-171).</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_449" name="note_449" href="#noteref_449">449.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Pleas and Mem., Roll A 1, membr. 31.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_450" name="note_450" href="#noteref_450">450.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">See letter from the mayor, &amp;c., to the king informing him that his
+wishes had been carried out.—<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, Roll A 1. membr. xxviii (32).</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_451" name="note_451" href="#noteref_451">451.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">At Christmas, both the primate and the city despatched letters to
+Edward, who was then at Worcester, to that effect.—<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, Roll A 1.
+memb. xxviii (32).</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_452" name="note_452" href="#noteref_452">452.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Chron. Edward I and II. i, 343-344.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_453" name="note_453" href="#noteref_453">453.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Pleas and Mem., Roll A 1. membr. xxviii (32).</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_454" name="note_454" href="#noteref_454">454.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Chron. Edward I and II. i, 242-243.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_455" name="note_455" href="#noteref_455">455.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, i, 245, 346.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_456" name="note_456" href="#noteref_456">456.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, i. 246-247.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_457" name="note_457" href="#noteref_457">457.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The will is enrolled in the records of the Court of Husting,
+Roll 61 (17). His devise to St. Paul's was challenged by John de
+Pulteney, and execution stayed.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_458" name="note_458" href="#noteref_458">458.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">According to the compiler of the "Annales Paulini" (Chron.
+Edward I and II, i, 352), Mortimer was taken "in camera Isabelle
+reginæ."</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_459" name="note_459" href="#noteref_459">459.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">She died in 1357. and was buried in the church of the Grey Friars,
+in the city.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_460" name="note_460" href="#noteref_460">460.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">"The last days of Queen Isabella."—Archæol., vol. xxxv, p. 464.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_461" name="note_461" href="#noteref_461">461.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">On her first arrival in London she was conducted by a cavalcade
+of citizens to the Bishop of Ely's house in Holborn, and after her
+marriage, was made the recipient of a present of gold and silver and a
+great store of all kinds of provisions. Her coronation, which took place
+two years later (Feb., 1330), was also made the occasion for a further
+display of their loyalty and affection.—Chron. Edward I and II, i,
+338, 339, 349.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_462" name="note_462" href="#noteref_462">462.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Green, Hist. of the English People, i, 410. Imposts on wool,
+writes Bishop Stubbs, became of such importance at this period that
+"the merchants again seemed likely to furnish the realm with a new
+estate."—Const. Hist., ii. 379.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_463" name="note_463" href="#noteref_463">463.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Supra</span></span>, pp. 112-115.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_464" name="note_464" href="#noteref_464">464.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">"Eodem anno (<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">i.e.</span></span>, 1326) post Pascha dominus rex habuit consilium
+apud Westmonasterium; et ordinatum fuit ibi quod mercatores
+emerent lanas. corias et plumbum, in certis locis Angliæ, Walliæ et
+Hyberniæ, et illa loca vocantur Stapel."—Chron. Edward I and II,
+i, 312. <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Cf.</span></span> Pleas and Mem., Roll A 1, membr. 15.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_465" name="note_465" href="#noteref_465">465.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Dated 23 April, 1327. Pleas and Mem., Roll A 1, membr. i
+(3) dors.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_466" name="note_466" href="#noteref_466">466.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Dated Nottingham, 30 April (1327). Rymer's Fœdera. Vol. ii,
+pt. ii. p. 705.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_467" name="note_467" href="#noteref_467">467.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Writ to the collector of dues in the port of London and other
+places on both sides of the Thames as far as Gravesend. Dated Overton,
+2 July, 1 Edward III (<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-variant: small-caps">a.d.</span></span> 1327). Pleas and Mem., Roll A 1,
+membr. 7 dors (cedula).</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_468" name="note_468" href="#noteref_468">468.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, Roll A 1, membr. 7 dors.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_469" name="note_469" href="#noteref_469">469.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letters patent, dated Lincoln, 23 Sept., 1 Edward III (<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-variant: small-caps">a.d.</span></span>
+1327). <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, Roll A 1, membr. 7 dors.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_470" name="note_470" href="#noteref_470">470.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Writ to sheriffs to see the restrictions carried out, dated York,
+1 March, 2 Edward III (<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-variant: small-caps">a.d.</span></span> 1327-8). <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, Roll A 1, membr. 24
+dors.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_471" name="note_471" href="#noteref_471">471.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Dated from Coventry. <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, Roll A 1, membr. 18 dors.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_472" name="note_472" href="#noteref_472">472.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Return to writ, dated 12 January, 1 Edward III (<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-variant: small-caps">A.D.</span></span> 1327-8).—Pleas
+and Mem., Roll A 1, membr. 20.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_473" name="note_473" href="#noteref_473">473.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter from the Mayor, &amp;c., of York, to the City of London,
+dated 29 January, and reply.—Pleas and Mem., Roll A 1, membr.
+xix (23).</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_474" name="note_474" href="#noteref_474">474.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id. ibid.</span></span></p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_475" name="note_475" href="#noteref_475">475.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, Roll A 1, membr. xvii (20) dors. The letter was sent in
+reply to one from the City's representatives, Grantham and Priour,
+asking for instructions.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_476" name="note_476" href="#noteref_476">476.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Pleas and Mem., Roll A 1, membr. xix (23) dors.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_477" name="note_477" href="#noteref_477">477.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">He had been an intimate favourite of Edward II. and had been
+removed, with others, from that king's service in 1311. Notwithstanding
+this, he appears as the king's Chamberlain in 1316. Ten
+years later, when the city was in the hands of an infuriated mob, and
+the king confined at Kenilworth, John de Charleton took the Earl of
+Arundel prisoner and caused him to be beheaded. In 1329 the citizens
+received peremptory orders from Edward III, not to harbour him in the
+city.—Chron. Edward I &amp; II. i, 247.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_478" name="note_478" href="#noteref_478">478.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Pleas and Mem., Roll A 1, membr. 24.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_479" name="note_479" href="#noteref_479">479.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Pleas and Mem., Roll A 1, membr. 24.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_480" name="note_480" href="#noteref_480">480.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book E, fo. 183. (Memorials, p. 169.)</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_481" name="note_481" href="#noteref_481">481.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">"In 1333 they were again established in England, but merchants
+ignored them, and in the following year they were abolished. From
+1344 onwards they are frequently discussed in parliament and assemblies
+of the merchants; and by the statute of 1353 the system was consolidated."—Stubbs,
+Const. Hist., ii, 412.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_482" name="note_482" href="#noteref_482">482.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book G. fos. 35b, 76.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_483" name="note_483" href="#noteref_483">483.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Rymer's Fœdera (1821), vol. ii, pt. ii. p. 765.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_484" name="note_484" href="#noteref_484">484.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Chron. Edward I and II, i, 247, 249.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_485" name="note_485" href="#noteref_485">485.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Chron. Edward I and II. i, 249, 251.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_486" name="note_486" href="#noteref_486">486.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Rymer's Fœdera (1821), vol. ii, pt. ii, p. 815.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_487" name="note_487" href="#noteref_487">487.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Rex Franciæ subtiliavit viis et modis quibus potuit qualiter deturbaret
+regem Angliæ et repatriare faceret ne tantum destrueret et debellaret
+regnum Scotiæ.—Knighton (Rolls Series No. 76), i, 476.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_488" name="note_488" href="#noteref_488">488.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, i, 461.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_489" name="note_489" href="#noteref_489">489.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book E, fos. 1-4—(Memorials, pp. 187-190).</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_490" name="note_490" href="#noteref_490">490.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">John de Grantham was allowed 60 shillings for a horse which he
+lost whilst going to this parliament on the city's business. (Letter Book
+F, fo. 9b.) It is, however, not clear that Grantham attended the
+parliament as a city member.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_491" name="note_491" href="#noteref_491">491.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Chron. Edward I and II, ii. 122.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_492" name="note_492" href="#noteref_492">492.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter patent, dated 12 August.—Pleas and Mem., Roll A 1,
+membr. 35.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_493" name="note_493" href="#noteref_493">493.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id. ibid.</span></span></p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_494" name="note_494" href="#noteref_494">494.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter patent, dated Westm., 24 March.—Letter Book F., fo. 6.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_495" name="note_495" href="#noteref_495">495.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, fo. 6b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_496" name="note_496" href="#noteref_496">496.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Chron. Edward I and II, i, 366.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_497" name="note_497" href="#noteref_497">497.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The king's letter, dated Stamford, 1 June, 1337.—Letter Book F,
+fo. 6b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_498" name="note_498" href="#noteref_498">498.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book F, fos. 4-5.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_499" name="note_499" href="#noteref_499">499.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Charter dated Westminster, 26 March, 1337, preserved at the
+Guildhall (Box No. 5). The king made frequent attempts to annul
+this charter.—Letter Book F, fo. 197; Letter Book G, fos. 11b, 41b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_500" name="note_500" href="#noteref_500">500.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, fo. 9.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_501" name="note_501" href="#noteref_501">501.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, fo. 9b. (Memorials, p. 197).</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_502" name="note_502" href="#noteref_502">502.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, fo. 10b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_503" name="note_503" href="#noteref_503">503.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Stubbs, Const. Hist., ii, 380.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_504" name="note_504" href="#noteref_504">504.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book F, fo. 42.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_505" name="note_505" href="#noteref_505">505.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Pleas and Mem., Roll A 3, membr. 3 and 3 dors.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_506" name="note_506" href="#noteref_506">506.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Stubbs, Const. Hist., ii, 380-381.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_507" name="note_507" href="#noteref_507">507.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book F, fos. 3, 3b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_508" name="note_508" href="#noteref_508">508.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, fo. 14b. <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, fo. 18b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_509" name="note_509" href="#noteref_509">509.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Pleas and Mem., Roll A 5, membr. 3 dors.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_510" name="note_510" href="#noteref_510">510.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, membr. 5 dors.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_511" name="note_511" href="#noteref_511">511.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, membr. 6. On the 23 October, the Duke of Cornwall,
+whom the king had nominated regent during his absence abroad, wrote
+to the Mayor, &amp;c., of London, bidding him put the city into a posture
+of defence.—Letter Book F, fo. 19.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_512" name="note_512" href="#noteref_512">512.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Skumarii</span></span>: a scummar, a rover. Skeats' Glossary to the Bruce
+(Early Eng. Text Soc. <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">s. v.</span></span>)</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_513" name="note_513" href="#noteref_513">513.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book F, fos. 22b-23.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_514" name="note_514" href="#noteref_514">514.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Pleas and Mem., Roll A 3, membr. 1.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_515" name="note_515" href="#noteref_515">515.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book F, fly leaf. (Memorials, p. 204.)</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_516" name="note_516" href="#noteref_516">516.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book F, fly-leaf. The passage was printed by the late
+Mr. Riley, although somewhat inaccurately, in his Memorials (p. 205).
+The original MS. runs thus: "Item in Camera Gildaule sunt sex Instrumenta
+de Laton vocata Gonnes cum quinque teleres ad eadem.
+Item pelete de plumbo pro eidem Instrumentis que ponderant iiij<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="vertical-align: super">c</span></span> li et
+dj. Item xxxij li de pulvere pro dictis instrumentis."</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_517" name="note_517" href="#noteref_517">517.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The late Mr. Riley misread "roleres" for "teleres" (the writing
+is not very legible), and therefore thought the passage referred to heavy
+ordnance.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_518" name="note_518" href="#noteref_518">518.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Richard Hastinges bequeaths by will in 1558 his bows and arrows,
+with "tyllers" &amp;c.—Calendar of Wills, Court of Hust., London, ii,
+670.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_519" name="note_519" href="#noteref_519">519.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Congregacio Maioris Aldermannorum et unius hominis cujuslibet
+warde civitatis pro negociis communitatem tangentibus die veneris
+proxima post festum Sancte Katerine Virginis (25 Nov.) anno xiij<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="vertical-align: super">c</span></span>
+contra adventum domini regis et regine de partibus transmarinis.—Pleas
+and Mem., Roll A 3, membr. 10.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_520" name="note_520" href="#noteref_520">520.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book F, fo. 30b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_521" name="note_521" href="#noteref_521">521.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book F, fo. 32b. (Memorials, pp. 208-210.)</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_522" name="note_522" href="#noteref_522">522.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Pleas and Mem., Roll A 3, membr. 12 dors.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_523" name="note_523" href="#noteref_523">523.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book F, fo. 34b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_524" name="note_524" href="#noteref_524">524.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book F, fo. 39.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_525" name="note_525" href="#noteref_525">525.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Pleas and Mem., Roll A 3, membr. 20-21. Letter Book F, fo. 37b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_526" name="note_526" href="#noteref_526">526.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">A cedula inserted between membranes 19 and 20 of Pleas and
+Mem., Roll A 3.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_527" name="note_527" href="#noteref_527">527.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Aungier, Fr. Chron. (Riley's transl.), 277.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_528" name="note_528" href="#noteref_528">528.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Murimuth, Contin. Chron. (Rolls Series No. 93), p. 116. Avesbury
+(<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Ibid</span></span>), p. 323.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_529" name="note_529" href="#noteref_529">529.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Aungier's Fr. Chron. (Riley's transl.), pp. 283-285. Murimuth,
+p. 117.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_530" name="note_530" href="#noteref_530">530.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Pleas and Mem., Roll A 3, membr. 22.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_531" name="note_531" href="#noteref_531">531.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book F, fos. 45b-49. Murimuth, pp. 118, 119.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_532" name="note_532" href="#noteref_532">532.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Murimuth, p. 119.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_533" name="note_533" href="#noteref_533">533.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book F, fo. 49.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_534" name="note_534" href="#noteref_534">534.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Dated 26 May, 1341. This charter, which was granted with
+the assent of parliament, is preserved at the Guildhall (Box No. 5.)</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_535" name="note_535" href="#noteref_535">535.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Pleas and Mem., Roll A 3, membr. 25 dors.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_536" name="note_536" href="#noteref_536">536.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, Roll A 5.
+membr. 17.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_537" name="note_537" href="#noteref_537">537.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Stubbs, Const. Hist., ii, 392 note. Aungier's Fr. Chron. (Riley's
+transl.), 290.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_538" name="note_538" href="#noteref_538">538.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Murimuth, 155.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_539" name="note_539" href="#noteref_539">539.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book F, fos. 81-84b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_540" name="note_540" href="#noteref_540">540.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Commission, dated Windsor, 20th March, 1345. <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span> fo. 98b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_541" name="note_541" href="#noteref_541">541.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span> fos. 99, 109, 110.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_542" name="note_542" href="#noteref_542">542.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book F, fo. 111.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_543" name="note_543" href="#noteref_543">543.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, fo. 116b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_544" name="note_544" href="#noteref_544">544.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Murimuth (Rolls Series, No. 93, p. 198) states that the number
+of vessels great and small amounted to 750; whilst in another Chronicle
+the same writer says that they numbered more than 1,500 (Chron. ed.
+for Eng. Hist. Soc., p. 164.)</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_545" name="note_545" href="#noteref_545">545.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book F. fo. 119. Murimuth (Rolls Series), p. 198.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_546" name="note_546" href="#noteref_546">546.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Murimuth (Rolls Series), pp. 205-211.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_547" name="note_547" href="#noteref_547">547.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book F, fo. 120b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_548" name="note_548" href="#noteref_548">548.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, fos. 121-125b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_549" name="note_549" href="#noteref_549">549.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book F, fos. 127, 127b, 130.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_550" name="note_550" href="#noteref_550">550.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, fos. 132b-133b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_551" name="note_551" href="#noteref_551">551.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, fos. 139, 140.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_552" name="note_552" href="#noteref_552">552.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, fo. 140 b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_553" name="note_553" href="#noteref_553">553.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Hist. Angl. (Rolls Series No. 28), i, 272. <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Cf.</span></span> Chron. Angliæ
+(Rolls Series No. 64). p. 26.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_554" name="note_554" href="#noteref_554">554.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">It was the first of the three pestilences (the others occurring in
+1361 and 1369) which served occasionally as land marks in history for
+dating conveyances and other records.—See Bond's Handy-book for
+verifying dates, p. 311.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_555" name="note_555" href="#noteref_555">555.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Stow extravagantly conjectures that no less than 50,000 perished
+within a year, all of whom were buried in Walter Manny's cemetery,
+near the Charterhouse. Another chronicler states that 200 were buried
+there alone between February and April, 1349.—Avesbury (Rolls
+Series No. 93), p. 407.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_556" name="note_556" href="#noteref_556">556.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Whilst the king forbade the encouragement of beggars by gifts
+of charity, the municipal authorities fixed the price of labour.—Letter
+Book F. fos. 163, 168, 169, 181. At the close of the year (1349)
+a statute—known as the Statute of Labourers—was passed, fixing the
+scale of wages at the rate prevalent before the Black Death, and ordering
+punishment to be inflicted on those who demanded more.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_557" name="note_557" href="#noteref_557">557.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book F, fo. 168.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_558" name="note_558" href="#noteref_558">558.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, fo. 191b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_559" name="note_559" href="#noteref_559">559.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">By writ, dated 1 July. Letter Book F, fo. 185b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_560" name="note_560" href="#noteref_560">560.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book F, fos. 187b, 188b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_561" name="note_561" href="#noteref_561">561.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Avesbury (Rolls Series No. 93), p. 412.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_562" name="note_562" href="#noteref_562">562.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book F, fos. 174, 176.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_563" name="note_563" href="#noteref_563">563.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Rot. Parl., ii, 155.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_564" name="note_564" href="#noteref_564">564.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book G, fo. 47.—Their cost, amounting to nearly £500, was
+assessed on the wards.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_565" name="note_565" href="#noteref_565">565.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book G, fo. 53b. (Memorials, pp. 285-289).</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_566" name="note_566" href="#noteref_566">566.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Walshingham (Rolls Series No. 28), i, 283. Chron. Angliæ
+(Rolls Series No. 64), p. 37.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_567" name="note_567" href="#noteref_567">567.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book G, fos. 65-67.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_568" name="note_568" href="#noteref_568">568.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book G, fo. 60.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_569" name="note_569" href="#noteref_569">569.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Relief on this point was afforded by the king in February, 1359,
+by the issue of a writ to the effect that the names of his purveyors
+should be handed to the Mayor and Sheriffs of London, and that the
+purveyors shall not seize any victuals until they had shown and read
+their commission.—Letter Book G, fo. 74.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_570" name="note_570" href="#noteref_570">570.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Walsingham, i, 288.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_571" name="note_571" href="#noteref_571">571.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book G, fo. 133.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_572" name="note_572" href="#noteref_572">572.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Stow's Survey (Thom's ed. 1876), pp. 41, 90.—If we include
+David, King of Denmark (as some do), the number of kings entertained
+on this occasion was five, and to this day the toast of "Prosperity to
+the Vintners' Company" is drunk at their banquets with five cheers in
+memory of the visit of the five crowned heads.—See a pamphlet entitled
+<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">The Vintners' Company with Five</span></span>, by B. Standring, Master of the
+Company in 1887.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_573" name="note_573" href="#noteref_573">573.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book G, fo. 133.—The list of subscribers, as printed in
+Herbert's Introduction to his History of the Twelve Great Livery
+Companies (p. 32), is very inaccurately transcribed.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_574" name="note_574" href="#noteref_574">574.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, fo. 158.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_575" name="note_575" href="#noteref_575">575.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, fos. 225b, 226b, 235b, 236b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_576" name="note_576" href="#noteref_576">576.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, fo. 228b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_577" name="note_577" href="#noteref_577">577.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book G, fo. 247b.—The money was advanced on the
+security of Exchequer bills. The names of the contributors and the
+several sums contributed, covering three folios of the Letter Book, have
+been for some reason erased.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_578" name="note_578" href="#noteref_578">578.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, fos. 263, 270.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_579" name="note_579" href="#noteref_579">579.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Fasciculi Zizaniorum (Rolls Series No. 5), introd., p. xxviii.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_580" name="note_580" href="#noteref_580">580.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book G, fos. 274b-275.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_581" name="note_581" href="#noteref_581">581.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, fo. 268.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_582" name="note_582" href="#noteref_582">582.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book G, fos. 268b, 270.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_583" name="note_583" href="#noteref_583">583.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The number of parishes is elsewhere given as 110.—<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, fo. 275.
+A list of London benefices, under date 31 Edward I [1302-3], is given
+in the City's Liber Custumarum (i, 228-230), the number being 116.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_584" name="note_584" href="#noteref_584">584.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Ralph de Diceto (Rolls Series No. 68), pref. vol. i, p. lvi.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_585" name="note_585" href="#noteref_585">585.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Chron. Edward I and II, introd., vol. i., p. xli.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_586" name="note_586" href="#noteref_586">586.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book G, fo. 271. (Memorials, pp. 350-352).</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_587" name="note_587" href="#noteref_587">587.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, fo. 289b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_588" name="note_588" href="#noteref_588">588.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Walsingham, i, 315.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_589" name="note_589" href="#noteref_589">589.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book G, fos. 297, 298, 304b, 306b, 307.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_590" name="note_590" href="#noteref_590">590.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book G, fo. 312b. Letter Book H, fos. 17-19b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_591" name="note_591" href="#noteref_591">591.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The parliament was originally summoned for the 12th February,
+but did not meet before the 28 April. The city members were John
+Pyel and William Walworth, Aldermen, William Essex and Adam
+Carlile, commoners.—Letter Book H. fos. 28. 29.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_592" name="note_592" href="#noteref_592">592.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Chron. Angliæ (Rolls Series No. 64), 78, 79.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_593" name="note_593" href="#noteref_593">593.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Walsingham i, 321. Higden's Polychron (Rolls Series No. 41),
+viii, 385. Chron. Angliæ (Rolls Series No. 64), pp. 94, 392.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_594" name="note_594" href="#noteref_594">594.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book H, fo. 45b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_595" name="note_595" href="#noteref_595">595.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">See the king's letter, dated "Haddele" Castle, 29 July, 1376.—Letter
+Book H, fo. 44.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_596" name="note_596" href="#noteref_596">596.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The names of the representatives of the guilds forming the first
+Common Council of the kind are placed on record.—Letter Book H,
+fos. 46b, 47.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_597" name="note_597" href="#noteref_597">597.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, fo. 44b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_598" name="note_598" href="#noteref_598">598.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book H, fo. 46.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_599" name="note_599" href="#noteref_599">599.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, fos. 47, 161; Journal 11, fo. 89.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_600" name="note_600" href="#noteref_600">600.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Charter, dated 26 May, 15 Edward III, <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Supra</span></span> p. 188.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_601" name="note_601" href="#noteref_601">601.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book H, fo. 173.—The names of those elected by the
+wards to the Common Council two years later (9 Ric. II), are inserted
+on a cedula between membranes, 15 and 16, of Pleas and Memoranda,
+Roll A 27.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_602" name="note_602" href="#noteref_602">602.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Walsingham, i, 327. Chron. Angliæ, pp. 142, 143. Modern
+writers, however, have discovered some good qualities in this lady.—See
+Notes and Queries, 7th Series, vol. vii, pp. 449, <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">et seq.</span></span></p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_603" name="note_603" href="#noteref_603">603.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Chron. Angliæ, p. 130.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_604" name="note_604" href="#noteref_604">604.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">See Hust., Rolls, 95, (130) (13O); 97, (9); 98, (73) (74)
+(82); 109, (6) (7) (8); also Will of William Burton—Calendar of
+Wills, Court of Hust., London, ii, 301.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_605" name="note_605" href="#noteref_605">605.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book H, fo. 77b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_606" name="note_606" href="#noteref_606">606.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, fo. 47b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_607" name="note_607" href="#noteref_607">607.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Pat. Roll, 3 Ric. II, part 1.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_608" name="note_608" href="#noteref_608">608.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">"Ut de cetero non major, antiquo more, sed capitaneus Londoniis
+haberetur, et quod Marescallus Angliæ in illa civitate, sicut alibi, reos
+arestare valeret; cum multis petitionibus quæ; manifeste obviabant urbis
+libertatibus et imminebant civium detrimento."—Chron. Angliæ, p. 120.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_609" name="note_609" href="#noteref_609">609.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Chron. Angliæ, pp. 123-125, 397; Walsingham, i, 325.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_610" name="note_610" href="#noteref_610">610.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Chron. Angliæ, pp. 125, 398.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_611" name="note_611" href="#noteref_611">611.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, pp. 127, 128.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_612" name="note_612" href="#noteref_612">612.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Chron. Angliæ, p. 129.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_613" name="note_613" href="#noteref_613">613.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book H, fos. 58, 59.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_614" name="note_614" href="#noteref_614">614.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Chron. Angliæ, p. 134.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_615" name="note_615" href="#noteref_615">615.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Chron. Angliæ, p. 129.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_616" name="note_616" href="#noteref_616">616.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, pp. 136-137, 142-143.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_617" name="note_617" href="#noteref_617">617.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Chron. Angliæ, pp. 146-149. The chronicler expresses the utmost
+joy and astonishment at the sudden change in the duke's manner. It
+was (he says) nothing less than a miracle that one who had so recently
+demanded a present of precious stones and 100 tuns of wine, as the
+price of his favour, should now appear so complacent.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_618" name="note_618" href="#noteref_618">618.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, pp. 150, 151.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_619" name="note_619" href="#noteref_619">619.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">"Londonienses præcipue obloquebantur, dicentes jam perpaucorum
+proceruin corda fore cum Rege, eos solos sibi fideles esse; quorum
+Rex licet ironice, vocabatur a nonnullis proceribus, eo quod ipsi multum
+juvissent eum in coronatione sua."—Walsingham i, 370; <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Cf.</span></span> Chron.
+Angliæ, p. 200.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_620" name="note_620" href="#noteref_620">620.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Chron. Angliæ, p. 153.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_621" name="note_621" href="#noteref_621">621.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Lib. Cust. ii, 467, 468. It appears from the City Records, that
+the king's butler in ordinary could claim the office of Coroner of the
+city.—See Letter Book H, fos. 68, 77b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_622" name="note_622" href="#noteref_622">622.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The Isle of Wight had been surprised and taken, Rye had been
+captured, Hastings had been destroyed by fire, and Winchelsea would
+have fallen into the hands of the enemy but for the bold defence made
+by the Abbot of Battle.—Walsingham i, 340-342; Chron. Angliæ,
+pp. 151, 166, 167.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_623" name="note_623" href="#noteref_623">623.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book H, fos. 76-77, 83.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_624" name="note_624" href="#noteref_624">624.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Et deputati sunt ad hujus pecuniæ custodiam duo cives Londonienses,
+scilicet Willelmus Walworthe et Johannes Philipot.—Chron.
+Angliæ, p. 171. Eight other citizens, viz., Adam Lovekyn, William
+Tonge, Thomas Welford, Robert Lucas, John Hadley, John Northampton,
+John Organ, and John Sely, were appointed collectors of the
+two fifteenths.—Letter Book H, fo. 90.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_625" name="note_625" href="#noteref_625">625.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Dated 4 Dec, 1377. Preserved at the Guildhall (Box No. 9).</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_626" name="note_626" href="#noteref_626">626.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book H, fo. 82.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_627" name="note_627" href="#noteref_627">627.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Chron. Angliæ, p. 194: Walsingham i, 367. It was stated before
+parliament, in 1378, that Walworth and Philipot had laid out every
+penny of the subsidy.—Stubbs, Const. Hist., ii, 445 note.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_628" name="note_628" href="#noteref_628">628.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Chron. Angliæ, pp. 199, 200. Philipot again showed his patriotism
+in 1380, by providing money and arms for an expedition sent to assist
+the Duke of Brittany.—<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, p. 266. He died in the summer of 1384.—Walsingham,
+ii, 115.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_629" name="note_629" href="#noteref_629">629.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book H, fo. 95.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_630" name="note_630" href="#noteref_630">630.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">"Et idcirco locum illum elegerant præmeditato facinori; ne Londonienses,
+si Londoniis fuisset Parliamentum prædictum, sua auctoritate
+vel potentia eorum conatus ullatenus impedirent."—Walsingham, i, 380.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_631" name="note_631" href="#noteref_631">631.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book H, fo. 101b. (Memorials, p. 427).</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_632" name="note_632" href="#noteref_632">632.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book H, fos. 109b, 110.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_633" name="note_633" href="#noteref_633">633.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, fos. 107, 108, 109.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_634" name="note_634" href="#noteref_634">634.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, fos. 111b, 113.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_635" name="note_635" href="#noteref_635">635.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book H, fos. 128, 132.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_636" name="note_636" href="#noteref_636">636.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The story of the insurrection under Wat Tyler, and of his death
+at the hands of Walworth, as told in Letter Book H, fo. 133b (Memorials,
+pp. 449-451), varies in some particulars from that given by Walsingham
+(i, 454-465), and in the Chronicon Angliæ (pp. 285-297).</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_637" name="note_637" href="#noteref_637">637.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book H, fo. 134.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_638" name="note_638" href="#noteref_638">638.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, fo. 134b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_639" name="note_639" href="#noteref_639">639.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Pleas and Mem., Roll A 24, membr. 9.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_640" name="note_640" href="#noteref_640">640.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Walsingham, i, 467-484; ii, 23.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_641" name="note_641" href="#noteref_641">641.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Walsingham, ii, 13.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_642" name="note_642" href="#noteref_642">642.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, ii, 9, 10.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_643" name="note_643" href="#noteref_643">643.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book H, fos. 149b, 150.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_644" name="note_644" href="#noteref_644">644.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">"Homo duri cordis et astutus, elatus propter divitias et superbus,
+qui nec inferioribus adquiescere, nec superiorum allegationibus sive
+monitis flecti valeret quin quod inceperat proprio ingenio torvo proposito
+ad quemcunque finem perducere niteretur."—Walsingham, ii, 65.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_645" name="note_645" href="#noteref_645">645.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book H, fo. 144. (Memorials, p. 463).</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_646" name="note_646" href="#noteref_646">646.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book H, fo. 146b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_647" name="note_647" href="#noteref_647">647.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, fos. 153-154.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_648" name="note_648" href="#noteref_648">648.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Walsingham, ii, 71. From the City's Records it appears that early
+in 1383, William Baret was alderman of Philipot's ward (Cornhill); but
+in the following year, when Brembre succeeded to his mayoralty, and
+the so-called "king's party" was again in the ascendant, Philipot again
+appears as alderman of his old ward, continuing in office until his death
+(12 Sept., 1384), when he was succeeded by John Rote.—Letter
+Book H, fos. 163, 174.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_649" name="note_649" href="#noteref_649">649.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book H, fo. 155b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_650" name="note_650" href="#noteref_650">650.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book H, fo. 154.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_651" name="note_651" href="#noteref_651">651.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book H, fo. 168. Three years later, "the folk of the
+Mercerye of London" complained to parliament that Brembre and his
+"upberers" had on this occasion obtained his election by force—"through
+debate and strenger partye."—(Rot., Parl. iii, 225). There
+is no evidence of this in the City's Records, although there appears to
+have been a disturbance at his re-election in 1384. It may be to this
+that the Mercers' petition refers. It is noteworthy that at the time of
+his election in 1383, Brembre was not an alderman, although in the previous
+year, and again in the year following his election, he is recorded as
+Alderman of Bread Street Ward.—Letter Book H, fos. 140, 163, 174.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_652" name="note_652" href="#noteref_652">652.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Breve quod piscenarii libertatis civitatis Londoniæ exerceant
+artem suam ut consueverunt. Dated 27 Nov., 1383.—Letter Book H,
+fo. 172.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_653" name="note_653" href="#noteref_653">653.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, fos. 154-154b, 176-177.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_654" name="note_654" href="#noteref_654">654.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Dated 26 Nov., 7 Ric. II. Preserved at the Guildhall (Box
+No. 9).</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_655" name="note_655" href="#noteref_655">655.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Pleas and Mem., Roll A 27, membr. 3 dors.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_656" name="note_656" href="#noteref_656">656.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book H, fos. 166, 167.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_657" name="note_657" href="#noteref_657">657.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Pleas and Mem., Roll A 27, membr. 3.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_658" name="note_658" href="#noteref_658">658.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Writ dated 9 February; Letter Box H, fo. 173b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_659" name="note_659" href="#noteref_659">659.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, fos. 173b, 174b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_660" name="note_660" href="#noteref_660">660.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, fo. 174.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_661" name="note_661" href="#noteref_661">661.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book H, fo. 179.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_662" name="note_662" href="#noteref_662">662.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book H, fo. 179b; Walsingham, ii, 116.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_663" name="note_663" href="#noteref_663">663.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Hidgen, Polychron. (Rolls Series No. 41), ix, 45 <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">seq.</span></span></p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_664" name="note_664" href="#noteref_664">664.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">"Hæc autem omnia sibi fieri procurarunt æmuli piscarii, ut
+dicebabur, quia per illos stetit quod ars et curia eorum erant destructæ."—Higden,
+ix, 49.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_665" name="note_665" href="#noteref_665">665.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book H, fo. 92. (Memorials, pp. 415-417).</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_666" name="note_666" href="#noteref_666">666.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book H, fo. 182. The names of those specially summoned
+are set out in Pleas and Mem., Roll A 27, membr. 15.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_667" name="note_667" href="#noteref_667">667.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Pleas and Mem., Roll A 27, membr. 4, 5 and 6.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_668" name="note_668" href="#noteref_668">668.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Higden, ix, 50, 51.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_669" name="note_669" href="#noteref_669">669.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book H, fo. 182.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_670" name="note_670" href="#noteref_670">670.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book H, fo. 198b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_671" name="note_671" href="#noteref_671">671.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Pleas and Mem., Roll A 27, membr. 26.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_672" name="note_672" href="#noteref_672">672.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letters patent of pardon received the king's sign manual on the
+3 June, 1386 (Letter Book H, fo. 216), but the prisoners were not
+released before April in the following year.—See Higden, Polychron.
+ix, 93.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_673" name="note_673" href="#noteref_673">673.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book H, fo. 214. (Memorials, p. 494).</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_674" name="note_674" href="#noteref_674">674.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Rot. Parl. iii, 227, cited by Riley in his "Memorials," p. 494,
+note.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_675" name="note_675" href="#noteref_675">675.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book H, fo. 176b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_676" name="note_676" href="#noteref_676">676.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">This letter, which was dated the 27 April, was delivered to Lord
+Zouche at his house by John Reche, Common Pleader, and Ralph
+Strode and John Harwell, Sergeants-at-Arms.—Letter Book H, fo. 215b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_677" name="note_677" href="#noteref_677">677.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">"Super quo dominus Rex respondit quod licet in sua potestate
+fuerat cum ipsis, Johanne, Johanne et Ricardo agere graciose bene
+tamen sibi provideret priusquam foret eis graciam concessurus."—Letter
+Book H, fo. 215b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_678" name="note_678" href="#noteref_678">678.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Higden, Polychron. ix, 93.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_679" name="note_679" href="#noteref_679">679.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book H, fo. 222.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_680" name="note_680" href="#noteref_680">680.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The oath as set out in the letter to the king differs from another
+copy of the oath, which immediately precedes the letter in Letter Book H,
+fos. 220b, 221; a clause having been subsequently added to the latter
+to the effect that the swearer abjured the opinions of Northampton and
+his followers, and would oppose their return within the bounds and limits
+set out in the king's letters patent.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_681" name="note_681" href="#noteref_681">681.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book H, fo. 222.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_682" name="note_682" href="#noteref_682">682.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book H, fo. 223b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_683" name="note_683" href="#noteref_683">683.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Walsingham, ii, 150.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_684" name="note_684" href="#noteref_684">684.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Higden, Polychron. ix, 104.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_685" name="note_685" href="#noteref_685">685.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book H, fo. 223b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_686" name="note_686" href="#noteref_686">686.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Higden, Polychron. ix, 106; Walsingham, ii, 166.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_687" name="note_687" href="#noteref_687">687.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book H, fo. 223b. (Memorials, p. 449.)</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_688" name="note_688" href="#noteref_688">688.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Higden, Polychron. ix, 108-109.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_689" name="note_689" href="#noteref_689">689.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">"Londonienses ... mobiles erant ut arundo, et nunc cum
+Dominis, nunc cum Rege, sentiebant, nusquam stabiles sed fallaces."—Hist.
+Angliæ, ii, 161.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_690" name="note_690" href="#noteref_690">690.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Higden, Polychron. ix, 108; Walsingham, ii, 169.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_691" name="note_691" href="#noteref_691">691.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Pleas and Mem., Roll A, membr. 7.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_692" name="note_692" href="#noteref_692">692.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Higden, ix, 111-114; Walsingham, ii, 170, 171; Engl. Chron.
+(Camd. Soc. No. 64), p. 5.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_693" name="note_693" href="#noteref_693">693.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Higden, ix, 117, 118.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_694" name="note_694" href="#noteref_694">694.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Howell's State Trials, i, 115.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_695" name="note_695" href="#noteref_695">695.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Higden, Polychron. ix, 168.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_696" name="note_696" href="#noteref_696">696.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">State Trials, i, 118, 119.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_697" name="note_697" href="#noteref_697">697.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Walsingham, ii, 165-174.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_698" name="note_698" href="#noteref_698">698.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Higden, ix, 167-169.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_699" name="note_699" href="#noteref_699">699.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book H, fo. 228.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_700" name="note_700" href="#noteref_700">700.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book H, fo, 161.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_701" name="note_701" href="#noteref_701">701.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.,</span></span> fo. 126; Higden ix, 179.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_702" name="note_702" href="#noteref_702">702.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book H, fos. 234, 234b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_703" name="note_703" href="#noteref_703">703.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Higden ix, 217.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_704" name="note_704" href="#noteref_704">704.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Higden ix, 238, 239.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_705" name="note_705" href="#noteref_705">705.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letters patent, date, 2 Dec, 1390.—Letter Book H, fo. 255;
+Higden ix, 243.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_706" name="note_706" href="#noteref_706">706.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book H, fo. 259. (Memorials, p. 526.).</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_707" name="note_707" href="#noteref_707">707.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, fo. 300.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_708" name="note_708" href="#noteref_708">708.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, fo. 270.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_709" name="note_709" href="#noteref_709">709.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Higden, ix, 270. According to Walsingham (Hist. Angl. ii, 208),
+the Lombard failed to get the money from the citizens, who nearly
+killed him when they learnt his purpose.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_710" name="note_710" href="#noteref_710">710.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The names of the citizens chosen for the occasion are given by
+Higden (Polychron. ix, 269, 270), and in Letter Book H, fo. 270.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_711" name="note_711" href="#noteref_711">711.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The reason given in the City Records for the dismissals which
+followed is stated to be "certain defects in a commission under the
+common seal and other causes."—Letter Book H, fo. 270b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_712" name="note_712" href="#noteref_712">712.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Higden, Polychron. ix, 272; Walsingham, ii, 208-209.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_713" name="note_713" href="#noteref_713">713.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Higden, ix, 273; Letter Book H, fo. 270b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_714" name="note_714" href="#noteref_714">714.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book H, fo. 275b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_715" name="note_715" href="#noteref_715">715.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, fo. 273.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_716" name="note_716" href="#noteref_716">716.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book H, fo. 269b; Higden, ix, 267. Walsingham (ii, 213)
+suggests that this was done at the instance of the Archbishop of York,
+the Chancellor.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_717" name="note_717" href="#noteref_717">717.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">"Putabant isti officiarii per hoc non modicum damnificare civitatem
+Lundoniæ, sed potius hoc multo majora damna intulerunt regi et
+hominibus regni quam jam dictæ civitati."—Higden, ix, 267-268.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_718" name="note_718" href="#noteref_718">718.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Walsingham, ii, 210.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_719" name="note_719" href="#noteref_719">719.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Higden, ix, 273.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_720" name="note_720" href="#noteref_720">720.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letters Patent of pardon, dated Woodstock, 19 September, 1392.
+Preserved at the Guildhall (Box No. 6).</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_721" name="note_721" href="#noteref_721">721.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Higden. ix, 274, 276, 278; Letter Book H, fos. 271b, 272, 274.
+Notwithstanding these remissions, the city was mulcted, according to
+Waisingham (ii, 211), in no less a sum than £10,000 before it received
+its liberties.—<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Cf.</span></span> Chron. of London, 1089-1483 (ed. by Sir H. Nicolas,
+sometimes called "Tyrrell's Chronicle," from a City Remembrancer of
+that name), p. 80.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_722" name="note_722" href="#noteref_722">722.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Stat. 17, Ric. II, c. 13; Letter Book H, fos. 290b, 291.; Bohun,
+"Privilegia Londini" (ed. 1723), p. 57.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_723" name="note_723" href="#noteref_723">723.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Higden, ix, 274.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_724" name="note_724" href="#noteref_724">724.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Stubbs, Const. Hist., ii, 489-490.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_725" name="note_725" href="#noteref_725">725.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book H, fo. 314.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_726" name="note_726" href="#noteref_726">726.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Engl. Chron. (Camd. Soc. No. 64), p. 12.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_727" name="note_727" href="#noteref_727">727.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">"Also this yere (1397-8), by selying of blank chartres, the Citie
+of London paied to the kyng a m<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="vertical-align: super">l</span></span> li."—Chron. of London (ed. by Sir
+H. Nicolas); p. 83.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_728" name="note_728" href="#noteref_728">728.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letters Patent, dat. 9 May, 1399.—Letter Book H, fo. 326.
+Richard set sail on the 29th.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_729" name="note_729" href="#noteref_729">729.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">"Douze cent hommes de Londres, tous armés et montés à
+cheval."—Froissart (ed. Lyon, 1559), vol. iv, c. 108, p. 328. In Lord
+Berner's translation of Froissart (iv, 566), the number is wrongly given
+as 12,000.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_730" name="note_730" href="#noteref_730">730.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Walsingham, ii, 245, 246.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_731" name="note_731" href="#noteref_731">731.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Walsingham, ii, 262-264. Serle's Christian name is given elsewhere
+as John.—Eng. Chron. (Camd. Soc., No. 64), p. 30. The writ
+for his execution is dated 5 August, 1404.—Letter Book I, fo. 31b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_732" name="note_732" href="#noteref_732">732.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book I, fo. 180b. (Memorials, pp. 638-641). Walsingham,
+ii, 317.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_733" name="note_733" href="#noteref_733">733.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">City Records Journal, I, fo. 83b. We have now a series of MS.
+Volumes among the City's archives known as "Journals" to assist us.
+They contain minutes of proceedings of the Court of Common Council,
+just as the "Repertories" (which we shall have occasion to consult
+later on), contain a record of the proceedings of the Court of Aldermen.
+The Letter Books may now be regarded as "fair copies" of the more
+important of the proceedings of both Courts.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_734" name="note_734" href="#noteref_734">734.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book H, fo. 307b. The Lollards are said to have derived
+their name from a low German word <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">lollen</span></span>, to sing or chant, from their
+habit of chanting, but their clerical opponents affected to derive it from
+the Latin <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">lolium</span></span>, as if this sect were as tares among the true wheat of
+the church.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_735" name="note_735" href="#noteref_735">735.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book I, fo. 125b-132.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_736" name="note_736" href="#noteref_736">736.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, fo. 130b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_737" name="note_737" href="#noteref_737">737.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Ibid.</span></span></p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_738" name="note_738" href="#noteref_738">738.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book I, fo. 11b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_739" name="note_739" href="#noteref_739">739.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">He appears, however, to have burnt by a special order of the king,
+before the passing of the statute.—See Fasc. Zizan. (Rolls Series No. 5),
+Introd. p. lxix.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_740" name="note_740" href="#noteref_740">740.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">A curious story is told of boys in the streets playing at England
+and Scotland at this time, with the result that what began in play
+ended in fighting and loss of life.—See Chron. Mon. S. Albani (Rolls
+Series No. 28, 3), p. 332.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_741" name="note_741" href="#noteref_741">741.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book I, fo. 16.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_742" name="note_742" href="#noteref_742">742.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book I, fo. 27; Chron. Mon. S. Albani (Rolls Series
+No. 28, 3), p. 379.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_743" name="note_743" href="#noteref_743">743.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book I, fo. 89b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_744" name="note_744" href="#noteref_744">744.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, fo. 113.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_745" name="note_745" href="#noteref_745">745.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, fo. 108b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_746" name="note_746" href="#noteref_746">746.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book I, fo. 112b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_747" name="note_747" href="#noteref_747">747.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Exchequer Roll, Lay Subsidy, 144-20.—See Archæological
+Journal, vol. xliv, 56-82.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_748" name="note_748" href="#noteref_748">748.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book I, fo. 54. (Memorials pp. 563-564.)</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_749" name="note_749" href="#noteref_749">749.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">License, dated Westminster, 29 May, 12 Henry IV (<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-variant: small-caps">A.D.</span></span> 1411).—Letter
+Book I, fo. 103b. In 1417 the mayor and aldermen ordained
+that the rector of St. Peter's for the time being should in future take
+precedence of the rectors of all other city churches, on the ground
+that Saint Peter's was the first church founded in the city of London,
+having been built in 199 by King Lucius, and for 400 years or more
+held the metropolitan chair.—Letter Book I, fo. 203. (Memorials,
+pp. 651-653.) <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Cf.</span></span> Journal 1, fo. 21b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_750" name="note_750" href="#noteref_750">750.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">"Eminentissima turris Ecclesiæ Anglicanæ et pugil invictus
+Dominus Thomas de Arundelia."—Hist. Angl. ii, 300.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_751" name="note_751" href="#noteref_751">751.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">A certain William Fyssher, a <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">parchemyner</span></span> or parchment-maker
+of London, was afterwards (1416) convicted of assisting in Oldcastle's
+escape, and was executed at Tyburn.—Letter Book I, fo. 181b. (Memorials,
+p. 641.)</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_752" name="note_752" href="#noteref_752">752.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Walsingham, ii, 292-299; Fasc. Zizan. (Rolls Series No. 5),
+433-449; Chron. of London (ed. by Sir H. Nicolas), p. 97.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_753" name="note_753" href="#noteref_753">753.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book I, fos. 286-290.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_754" name="note_754" href="#noteref_754">754.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">2 Hen. V. Stat. i, c. 7.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_755" name="note_755" href="#noteref_755">755.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">It was not, however, the last occasion upon which parliamentary
+action was attempted. In 1422, and again in 1425, the Lollards were
+formidable in London, and parliament on both occasions ordered that
+those who were in prison should be delivered at once to the Ordinary,
+in accordance with the provisions of this Statute.—Stubbs, Const.
+Hist., iii, 81, 363.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_756" name="note_756" href="#noteref_756">756.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book I, fo. 147.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_757" name="note_757" href="#noteref_757">757.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Walsingham, ii, 306, 307.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_758" name="note_758" href="#noteref_758">758.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Hist. Angl., ii, 307.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_759" name="note_759" href="#noteref_759">759.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book I, fol. 154.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_760" name="note_760" href="#noteref_760">760.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">See letter from the mayor to the king, giving an account of Cleydon's
+trial, 22nd August, 1415.—Letter Book I, fo. 155. (Memorials,
+p. 617). Foxe, "Acts and Monuments," iii, 531-534.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_761" name="note_761" href="#noteref_761">761.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Walsingham, ii, 327, 328.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_762" name="note_762" href="#noteref_762">762.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Engl. Chron. (Camd. Soc., No. 64), p. 46; Chron. of London
+(Nicolas), p. 106.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_763" name="note_763" href="#noteref_763">763.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Stubbs, Const. Hist., iii., 363, 364.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_764" name="note_764" href="#noteref_764">764.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book I, fo. 150. This "very antient memorandum" of
+the Lord Mayor's precedence in the City was submitted to Charles II
+in 1670, when that monarch insisted upon Sir Richard Ford, the Lord
+Mayor of the day, giving "the hand and the place" to the Prince of
+Orange (afterwards William III of England), on the occasion of the
+prince being entertained by the City.—Repertory, 76, fos. 28b, 29.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_765" name="note_765" href="#noteref_765">765.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book I, fo. 158b. (Memorials, p. 613).</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_766" name="note_766" href="#noteref_766">766.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, fo. 157.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_767" name="note_767" href="#noteref_767">767.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Gregory's Chron. (Camd. Soc, N.S., No. 17), pp. 108-109.
+Gregory was an alderman of the City, and an eye-witness of much that
+he relates.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_768" name="note_768" href="#noteref_768">768.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter dated 2nd August—the day on which Sir Thomas Grey,
+one of the chief conspiritors was executed.—Letter Book I, fo. 180.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_769" name="note_769" href="#noteref_769">769.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book I, fo. 143. (Memorials, p. 619).</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_770" name="note_770" href="#noteref_770">770.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book I, fo. 177.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_771" name="note_771" href="#noteref_771">771.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book I, fo. 159. (Memorials, pp. 620, 622).</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_772" name="note_772" href="#noteref_772">772.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">"Quali gaudio, quali tripudio, quali denique triumpho, sit acceptus
+a Londoniensibus, dicere prætermitto. Quia revera curiositas apparatumn,
+nimietas expensarum, varietates spectaculorum, tractatus exigerent
+merito speciales."—Walsingham, ii, 314.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_773" name="note_773" href="#noteref_773">773.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Chron. of London (Nicolas), p. 103.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_774" name="note_774" href="#noteref_774">774.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book I, fo. 178b. Other proclamations on the same subject
+are recorded in the same place, most of which will be found in
+"Memorials" (pp. 627-629).</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_775" name="note_775" href="#noteref_775">775.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book I, fo. 190b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_776" name="note_776" href="#noteref_776">776.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, fos. 188, 188b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_777" name="note_777" href="#noteref_777">777.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book I, fo. 191b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_778" name="note_778" href="#noteref_778">778.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book I, fo. 218b. In May, 1419, the sword was surrendered,
+and the security changed to one on wool, woolfells, &amp;c.—<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>,
+fo. 227b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_779" name="note_779" href="#noteref_779">779.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book I, fo. 229. (Memorials, p. 654.)</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_780" name="note_780" href="#noteref_780">780.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 1, fo. 30b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_781" name="note_781" href="#noteref_781">781.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book I, fo. 200b. (Memorials, p. 657.)</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_782" name="note_782" href="#noteref_782">782.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter, dated Caen, 11 September.—Letter Book I, fo. 200b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_783" name="note_783" href="#noteref_783">783.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Writ, dated 18th Oct.—Letter Book I, fo. 203.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_784" name="note_784" href="#noteref_784">784.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Stubbs, Const. Hist., iii, 89.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_785" name="note_785" href="#noteref_785">785.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book I, fo. 222.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_786" name="note_786" href="#noteref_786">786.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book I, fos. 211b, 212b, 217. Proclamations made by the
+civic authorities at this time were subscribed "Carpenter"—the name
+of the Common Clerk or Town Clerk of the City. The custom of the
+Town Clerk of London for the time being, signing official documents
+of this kind with his surname alone, continues at the present day.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_787" name="note_787" href="#noteref_787">787.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book I, fo. 215b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_788" name="note_788" href="#noteref_788">788.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book I, fo. 216. (Memorials, p. 664).</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_789" name="note_789" href="#noteref_789">789.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book I, fo. 216. On the 15th September the question of
+payment to the brewers, wine drawers and turners of the cups was
+considered.—Journal I, fo. 48. (Memorials, pp. 665, 666).</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_790" name="note_790" href="#noteref_790">790.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Gregory's Chron. (Camd. Soc, N.S., No. 17), 1222.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_791" name="note_791" href="#noteref_791">791.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book I, fos. 236, 236b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_792" name="note_792" href="#noteref_792">792.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book I, fo. 237. (Memorials, p. 674).</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_793" name="note_793" href="#noteref_793">793.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, fo. 241b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_794" name="note_794" href="#noteref_794">794.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book I, fo. 252.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_795" name="note_795" href="#noteref_795">795.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Walsingham, ii, 335.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_796" name="note_796" href="#noteref_796">796.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book I, fo. 263.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_797" name="note_797" href="#noteref_797">797.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book I, fo. 259. According to Walsingham (ii, 336), the
+ceremony took place on the <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">first</span></span> Sunday in Lent.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_798" name="note_798" href="#noteref_798">798.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Walsingham, ii, 336, 337.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_799" name="note_799" href="#noteref_799">799.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Parliament voted a fifteenth and a tenth to assist the king in
+his necessities; John Gedney, alderman, John Perneys, John Bacon,
+grocer, and John Patesley, goldsmith, being appointed commissioners to
+levy the same within the City.—Letter Book I, fo. 277b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_800" name="note_800" href="#noteref_800">800.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book K, fo. 1b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_801" name="note_801" href="#noteref_801">801.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book I, fo. 282b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_802" name="note_802" href="#noteref_802">802.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book I, fo. 282b; Letter Book K, fo. 12.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_803" name="note_803" href="#noteref_803">803.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book K, fo. 2.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_804" name="note_804" href="#noteref_804">804.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Stubbs, Const. Hist., iii, 97.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_805" name="note_805" href="#noteref_805">805.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book K, fos. 10, 10b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_806" name="note_806" href="#noteref_806">806.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, fo. 15b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_807" name="note_807" href="#noteref_807">807.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book K, fos. 10-18.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_808" name="note_808" href="#noteref_808">808.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Chron. London (Nicolas), p. 114; Gregory's Chron. (Camd. Soc.,
+N.S., No. 17), p. 159; Engl. Chron. (Camd. Soc., No. 64), pp. 53, 54.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_809" name="note_809" href="#noteref_809">809.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">See two letters from the mayor.—Letter Book K, fos. 18b, 21.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_810" name="note_810" href="#noteref_810">810.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Gregory's Chron., p. 160.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_811" name="note_811" href="#noteref_811">811.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, p. 162.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_812" name="note_812" href="#noteref_812">812.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 2, fos. 22b, 64b (new pagination).</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_813" name="note_813" href="#noteref_813">813.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book K, fo. 50b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_814" name="note_814" href="#noteref_814">814.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Gregory's Chron., p. 161.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_815" name="note_815" href="#noteref_815">815.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book K, fo. 55b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_816" name="note_816" href="#noteref_816">816.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book K, fos. 62, 63b; Gregory's Chron., p. 164.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_817" name="note_817" href="#noteref_817">817.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book K, fo. 66b; Gregory's Chron., p. 164.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_818" name="note_818" href="#noteref_818">818.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book K, fo. 68b. In 1443 the Common Council agreed
+to allow the City members their reasonable expenses out of the
+chamber (Journal 5, fo. 129b), but when parliament met at Coventry
+in 1459, the City members were allowed 40<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">s.</span></span> a day, besides any disbursements
+they might make in the City's honour (Journal 6, fo. 166b),
+and the same allowance was made in 1464, when parliament sat at
+York (Journal 7, fos. 52, 54).</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_819" name="note_819" href="#noteref_819">819.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, fo. 69b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_820" name="note_820" href="#noteref_820">820.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Gregory's Chron., pp. 164-168.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_821" name="note_821" href="#noteref_821">821.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">City Records, Liber Dunthorn, fo. 61b; Letter Book K, fo. 70.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_822" name="note_822" href="#noteref_822">822.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Cal. of Wills, Court of Husting, London, ii, 509.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_823" name="note_823" href="#noteref_823">823.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book K, fo. 84.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_824" name="note_824" href="#noteref_824">824.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">A long account of his entry into the French capital, and of the
+pageantry in honour of the occasion, is set out in full in the City's
+Records.—Letter Book K, fos. 101b-103.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_825" name="note_825" href="#noteref_825">825.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">A full descriptive account of Henry's reception on his return from
+France is set out in the City Records (Letter Book K, fos. 103b-104b).
+It purports to be an account sent by John Carpenter, the Town Clerk,
+to a friend, and has been printed at the end of the <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Liber Albus</span></span> (Rolls
+Series); <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Cf.</span></span> Gregory's Chron., pp. 173-175.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_826" name="note_826" href="#noteref_826">826.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">He informed the City of his intention by letter, dated from Ghent
+the 13th April.—Letter Book K, fo. 105.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_827" name="note_827" href="#noteref_827">827.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Stubbs, Const. Hist., iii, 114-117.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_828" name="note_828" href="#noteref_828">828.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book K, fo. 137b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_829" name="note_829" href="#noteref_829">829.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book K, fo. 138.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_830" name="note_830" href="#noteref_830">830.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Gregory's Chron., p. 177.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_831" name="note_831" href="#noteref_831">831.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book K, fo. 148.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_832" name="note_832" href="#noteref_832">832.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">"And that same yere (1437), the Mayre of London sende, by the
+good a-vyse and consent of craftys, sent sowdyers to Calys, for hyt was
+sayde that the Duke of Burgone lay sege unto Calis."—Gregory's
+Chron. p. 178.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_833" name="note_833" href="#noteref_833">833.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book K, fos. 160-162.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_834" name="note_834" href="#noteref_834">834.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Gregory's Chron. p. 179.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_835" name="note_835" href="#noteref_835">835.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book K. fo. 183b. The tax was found to be so successful
+that it was subsequently renewed. In 1453 it was renewed for the
+king's life.—<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, fo. 280b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_836" name="note_836" href="#noteref_836">836.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 3, fo. 103b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_837" name="note_837" href="#noteref_837">837.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Chron. of London (Nicolas), p. 129.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_838" name="note_838" href="#noteref_838">838.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The validity as well as the effect of this charter (which is preserved
+in the Town Clerk's office) has been made the subject of much controversy,
+some contending that it is in effect a grant of the soil of the river
+from Staines to Yantlet, that being the extent of the City's liberties on
+the Thames, whilst others restrict the grant to the City's territorial
+limits, <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">i.e.</span></span>, from Temple Bar to the Tower.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_839" name="note_839" href="#noteref_839">839.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book K, fo. 220b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_840" name="note_840" href="#noteref_840">840.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Chron. of London (Nicholas), p. 134.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_841" name="note_841" href="#noteref_841">841.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">See "Historical Memoranda," by Stow, printed in "Three
+Fifteenth Cent. Chron." (Camd. Soc., N.S., No. 28), pp. 94-99.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_842" name="note_842" href="#noteref_842">842.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">"And the Meire of London with the comynes of the city came
+to the kynge besekynge him that he wolde tarye in the cite, and they
+wolde lyve and dye with him, and pay for his costes of householde an
+halff yere; but he wold nott, but toke his journey to Kyllyngworthe."—"Three
+Fifteenth Cent. Chronicles" (Camd. Soc.), p. 67.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_843" name="note_843" href="#noteref_843">843.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 5, fo. 36b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_844" name="note_844" href="#noteref_844">844.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 5, fo. 39.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_845" name="note_845" href="#noteref_845">845.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">He had been admitted alderman of Lime Street ward in 1448,
+at the king's special request, and had only recently been discharged.—Journal
+4, fo. 213b; Journal 5, fo. 38b. In 1461 he left England,
+but was captured at sea by the French and put to ransom for 4,000
+marks.—Fabyan, p. 638.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_846" name="note_846" href="#noteref_846">846.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Holinshed, iii, 224.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_847" name="note_847" href="#noteref_847">847.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Gregory's Chron., p. 192.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_848" name="note_848" href="#noteref_848">848.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 5, fo. 40b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_849" name="note_849" href="#noteref_849">849.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Alexander Iden, who appears to have pursued Cade beyond the
+limits of his own jurisdiction, as Sheriff of Kent, into the neighbouring
+county of Sussex, where the rebel was apprehended in a garden at
+Heathfield.—"Three Fifteenth Cent. Chron.," preface, p. vii.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_850" name="note_850" href="#noteref_850">850.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The exclusion of the Duke and other nobles from the king's
+council had been made an express ground of complaint by the Kentish
+insurgents.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_851" name="note_851" href="#noteref_851">851.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Chron., p. 196.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_852" name="note_852" href="#noteref_852">852.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">"And so thei brought (the duke) ungirt thurgh London bitwene
+ij bisshoppes ridyng unto his place; and after that made hym swere at
+Paulis after theire entent, and put him frome his good peticions which
+were for the comoen wele of the realme."—Chron. of London (Nicolas),
+p. 138.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_853" name="note_853" href="#noteref_853">853.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 5, fos. 131, 132b, 133b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_854" name="note_854" href="#noteref_854">854.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 5, fos. 134b, 135b, 136.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_855" name="note_855" href="#noteref_855">855.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, fo. 148.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_856" name="note_856" href="#noteref_856">856.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, fo. 152.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_857" name="note_857" href="#noteref_857">857.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, fo. 152b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_858" name="note_858" href="#noteref_858">858.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, fos. 183, 184.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_859" name="note_859" href="#noteref_859">859.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 5, fo. 206.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_860" name="note_860" href="#noteref_860">860.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Report of City Chamberlain to the Court of Common Council.—Journal
+5, fos. 227-228b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_861" name="note_861" href="#noteref_861">861.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">News-letter of John Stodeley, 19 Jan., 1454; Paston Letters
+(Gairdner), i, 265, 266.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_862" name="note_862" href="#noteref_862">862.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 5, fos 143, 145b, 152, 152b-160b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_863" name="note_863" href="#noteref_863">863.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 5, fo. 150.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_864" name="note_864" href="#noteref_864">864.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, fos. 162, 162b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_865" name="note_865" href="#noteref_865">865.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, fo. 164b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_866" name="note_866" href="#noteref_866">866.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Booking to Paston, 15 May; Paston Letters (Gairdner), i, 387;
+<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Cf.</span></span> Chron. of London (Nicolas), p. 139; Gregory's Chron., p. 199.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_867" name="note_867" href="#noteref_867">867.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">William Cantelowe, alderman of Cripplegate and Billingsgate
+wards, from the latter of which he was discharged in October, 1461, on
+the score of old age and infirmity (Journal 6, fo. 81b). He appears in
+his time to have had financial dealings with the crown, on one occasion
+conveying money over sea for bringing Queen Margaret to England,
+and on another supplying gunpowder to the castle of Cherbourg, when
+it was in the hands of the English. He is thought by some to be
+identical with the William Cantelowe who afterwards (in 1464) captured
+Henry VI in a wood in the North of England.—"Three Fifteenth
+Cent. Chron." (Camd. Soc, N.S., No. 28), Preface, p. viii.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_868" name="note_868" href="#noteref_868">868.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Short English Chron. (Camd. Soc., N.S., No. 28), p. 70.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_869" name="note_869" href="#noteref_869">869.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book K, fo. 287.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_870" name="note_870" href="#noteref_870">870.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, fo. 288b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_871" name="note_871" href="#noteref_871">871.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Cotton MS., Vitell. A, xvi, fo. 114.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_872" name="note_872" href="#noteref_872">872.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Engl. Chron., 1377-1461 (Camd. Soc., No. 64), p. 77.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_873" name="note_873" href="#noteref_873">873.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Fabyan, Chron. (ed. 1811), p. 633; <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Cf.</span></span> Chron. of London (Nicolas),
+p. 139.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_874" name="note_874" href="#noteref_874">874.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 6, fos. 138, 138b, 139.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_875" name="note_875" href="#noteref_875">875.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Engl. Chron., 1377-1461 (Camd. Soc., No. 64), p. 78; <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Cf.</span></span> Fabyan,
+p. 633; Holinshed, iii, 249.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_876" name="note_876" href="#noteref_876">876.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Short Engl. Chron. (Camd. Soc., N.S., No. 28), p. 71; Chron.
+of London (Nicolas), p. 140.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_877" name="note_877" href="#noteref_877">877.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 6, fo. 166.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_878" name="note_878" href="#noteref_878">878.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, fo. 145.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_879" name="note_879" href="#noteref_879">879.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, fo. 163.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_880" name="note_880" href="#noteref_880">880.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">English Chron., 1377-1461 (Camd. Soc., No. 64), p. 179.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_881" name="note_881" href="#noteref_881">881.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 6, fo. 224b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_882" name="note_882" href="#noteref_882">882.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">William Paston, writing to his brother John, under date 28th January,
+1460, remarks, "Item, the kyng cometh to London ward, and, as
+it is seyd, rereth the pepyll as he come; but it is certayn ther be comyssyons
+made in to dyvers schyres that every man be redy in his best aray
+to com when the kyng send for hem."—Paston Letters (Gairdner),
+i, 506.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_883" name="note_883" href="#noteref_883">883.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Paston Letters (Gairdner), Introd., p. cxl.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_884" name="note_884" href="#noteref_884">884.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The king's letter, dated 2 Feb., was read before the Common
+Council on the 5 Feb.—Letter Book K, fo. 313b; Journal 6, fo. 196b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_885" name="note_885" href="#noteref_885">885.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 6, fo. 197b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_886" name="note_886" href="#noteref_886">886.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, fo. 203b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_887" name="note_887" href="#noteref_887">887.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, fo. 158.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_888" name="note_888" href="#noteref_888">888.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 6, fo. 237.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_889" name="note_889" href="#noteref_889">889.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">It had been destroyed by fire during the Kentish outbreak.—Gregory's
+Chron., p. 193.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_890" name="note_890" href="#noteref_890">890.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 6, fo. 237b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_891" name="note_891" href="#noteref_891">891.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 6, fo. 238.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_892" name="note_892" href="#noteref_892">892.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, fo. 238b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_893" name="note_893" href="#noteref_893">893.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 6, fos. 239, 239b; Eng. Chron., 1377-1461 (Camd. Soc.
+No. 64), p. 94.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_894" name="note_894" href="#noteref_894">894.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 6, fo. 252b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_895" name="note_895" href="#noteref_895">895.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Eo quod nullus alius modus videtur esse tutus pro civitate.—<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>,
+fo. 251.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_896" name="note_896" href="#noteref_896">896.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 6, fo. 251b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_897" name="note_897" href="#noteref_897">897.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, fo. 250b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_898" name="note_898" href="#noteref_898">898.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Eng. Chron. (Camd. Soc., No. 64), p. 98. The Thames boatmen
+and sailors were almost as powerful and troublesome a body of men as
+the London apprentices. The Common Council had recently (11th
+July) endeavoured to subdue their turbulent spirit by the distribution
+among them of a large sum of money (£100).—Journal 6, fo. 254.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_899" name="note_899" href="#noteref_899">899.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">On the 4th July the Common Council voted the earls the sum of
+£1,000 by way of loan.—Journal 6, fo. 253.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_900" name="note_900" href="#noteref_900">900.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 6, fo. 256. By some inadvertence two copies of the
+agreement were sealed, one of which was returned to the mayor to be
+cancelled.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_901" name="note_901" href="#noteref_901">901.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 6, fo. 257.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_902" name="note_902" href="#noteref_902">902.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Gregory's Chron., p. 208; Engl. Chron., pp, 99-100; Short Engl.
+Chron., p. 75.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_903" name="note_903" href="#noteref_903">903.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The interview with the wardens of the companies took place at
+a Common Council held on the 13th December, 1460.—Journal 6,
+fo. 282b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_904" name="note_904" href="#noteref_904">904.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 6, fo. 13.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_905" name="note_905" href="#noteref_905">905.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The governing body in the city was still Lancastrian at heart. On
+the 13th Feb. the Common Council had voted Henry, at that time in
+the hands of Warwick, a loan of 1,000 marks, and a further sum of 500
+marks (making in all £1,000) for the purpose of <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">garnysshyng</span></span> and safeguarding
+the city. On the 24th a certain number of aldermen and
+commoners were deputed to answer for the safe custody of the Tower,
+and on the following day (25 Feb.) the mayor forbade, by public
+proclamation, any insult being offered to Sir Edmund Hampden and
+others, who had been despatched by the king and queen to London for
+the purpose of ascertaining "the true and faithful disposition" of the
+city.—Journal 6, fos. 35, 35b, 40.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_906" name="note_906" href="#noteref_906">906.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Gregory's Chron., p. 215.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_907" name="note_907" href="#noteref_907">907.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Stubbs, Const. Hist., iii, 189.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_908" name="note_908" href="#noteref_908">908.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 6, fo. 37b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_909" name="note_909" href="#noteref_909">909.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book L, fo. 4; Lib. Dunthorn, fo. 62; Journal 7, fo. 98.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_910" name="note_910" href="#noteref_910">910.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Short English Chron. (Camd. Soc., N.S., No. 28), p. 80.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_911" name="note_911" href="#noteref_911">911.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 7, fos. 97b, 98.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_912" name="note_912" href="#noteref_912">912.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Charter, dat. Winchecombe, 26 Aug., 1461. Preserved at the
+Guildhall (Box No. 28).</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_913" name="note_913" href="#noteref_913">913.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Inspeximus charter, dated Westminster, 25 March, 1462. Preserved
+at the Guildhall (Box No. 13).</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_914" name="note_914" href="#noteref_914">914.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 7, fo. 8.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_915" name="note_915" href="#noteref_915">915.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, fo. 15.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_916" name="note_916" href="#noteref_916">916.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">See Inspeximus charter 15 Charles II.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_917" name="note_917" href="#noteref_917">917.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 7, fo. 21b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_918" name="note_918" href="#noteref_918">918.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 7, fo. 175.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_919" name="note_919" href="#noteref_919">919.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Ancestor of Lord Bacon and others of the nobility.—See Orridge
+"Citizens and their Rulers," p. 222.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_920" name="note_920" href="#noteref_920">920.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Fabyan, p. 656. He was deprived of his aldermanry (Broad Street
+Ward) by the king's orders.—Journal 7, fo. 128.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_921" name="note_921" href="#noteref_921">921.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 7, fos. 196, 198, 199.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_922" name="note_922" href="#noteref_922">922.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 7, fos. 215b, 222b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_923" name="note_923" href="#noteref_923">923.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, fos. 229b, 230b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_924" name="note_924" href="#noteref_924">924.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, fo. 222b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_925" name="note_925" href="#noteref_925">925.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">A record of what took place in the city between the 1st and 6th
+October is set out in Journal 7, fo. 223b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_926" name="note_926" href="#noteref_926">926.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, fo. 225.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_927" name="note_927" href="#noteref_927">927.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">He had, after Warwick's flight to France in March of this year,
+put to death and impaled twenty of the earl's followers.—Warkworth's
+Chron. (Camd. Soc., No. 10), p. 9.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_928" name="note_928" href="#noteref_928">928.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 7, fo. 225.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_929" name="note_929" href="#noteref_929">929.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Fabyan Chron., p. 660.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_930" name="note_930" href="#noteref_930">930.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Warkworth's Chron. (Camd. Soc., No. 10), p. 15.—According to the
+chronicler, the <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Commons</span></span> of the city were still loyal to Henry, whom
+Archbishop Nevill had carried through the streets, weak and sickly as
+he was, in the hope of exciting the sympathy of the burgesses. Had
+the archbishop been a true man, "as the Commons of London were,"
+Edward would not have gained an entry into the city until after the
+victory of Barnet-field.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_931" name="note_931" href="#noteref_931">931.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 5, fos. 152, 175.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_932" name="note_932" href="#noteref_932">932.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The "bastard's" letter and the reply of the mayor and aldermen
+are set out in Journal 8, fos. 4b-6b, and Letter Book L, fo. 78.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_933" name="note_933" href="#noteref_933">933.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Holinshed, iii, 323; Fabyan, p. 662.—According to Warkworth
+(p. 19), the <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Commons</span></span> would willingly have admitted the rebels had
+the latter not attempted to fire Aldgate and London Bridge.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_934" name="note_934" href="#noteref_934">934.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Paston Letters, iii, 17.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_935" name="note_935" href="#noteref_935">935.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The 21st May is the day usually given as that on which Edward
+returned. The City's Journal, however, gives the day as the Eve of the
+Ascension, that festival falling on May the 23rd.—Journal 8, fo. 7.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_936" name="note_936" href="#noteref_936">936.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Warkworth's Chron., p. 21.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_937" name="note_937" href="#noteref_937">937.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Namely, Richard Lee, Matthew Philip, Ralph Verney, John
+Young, William Tailour, George Irlond, William Hampton, Bartholomew
+James, Thomas Stalbrok, and William Stokker.—Journal 8, fo. 7.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_938" name="note_938" href="#noteref_938">938.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 7, fo. 246.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_939" name="note_939" href="#noteref_939">939.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, 8, fo. 98.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_940" name="note_940" href="#noteref_940">940.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, fo. 101.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_941" name="note_941" href="#noteref_941">941.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 8, fo. 110b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_942" name="note_942" href="#noteref_942">942.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Preserved at the Guildhall (Box No. 28).</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_943" name="note_943" href="#noteref_943">943.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 8, fo. 244.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_944" name="note_944" href="#noteref_944">944.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Fabyan, p. 667.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_945" name="note_945" href="#noteref_945">945.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Proclamation, dated 21 Nov., 22 Edw. IV.—Letter Book L, fo.
+281b; Journal 9, fo. 2.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_946" name="note_946" href="#noteref_946">946.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 9, fo. 12.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_947" name="note_947" href="#noteref_947">947.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, fo. 14.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_948" name="note_948" href="#noteref_948">948.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, fo. 14b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_949" name="note_949" href="#noteref_949">949.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, fos. 18, 18b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_950" name="note_950" href="#noteref_950">950.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 9, fo. 21b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_951" name="note_951" href="#noteref_951">951.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The oath taken by Gloucester to King Edward V, as well as the
+oath which he was willing to take to the queen, if she consented to quit
+Westminster, were read before the Common Council on the 23rd March.—Journal
+9, fo. 23b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_952" name="note_952" href="#noteref_952">952.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Wife of Matthew Shore, a respectable goldsmith of Lombard
+Street:—</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-lg" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em; margin-top: 1.00em">
+<div class="tei tei-l" style="text-align: left; margin-left: 2.00em">"In Lombard-street, I once did dwelle,</div>
+<div class="tei tei-l" style="text-align: left; margin-left: 2.00em">As London yet can witness welle;</div>
+<div class="tei tei-l" style="text-align: left; margin-left: 2.00em">Where many gallants did beholde</div>
+<div class="tei tei-l" style="text-align: left; margin-left: 2.00em">My beautye in a shop of golde."</div>
+</div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="text-align: right; margin-bottom: 1.00em">(<span class="tei tei-hi" style="text-align: right"><span style="font-style: italic">Percy Reliques</span></span>).</p>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">She had recently been made to do penance by Gloucester in a white
+sheet for practising witchcraft upon him; but her unhappy position, as
+well as her well-known charity in better days, gained for her much
+sympathy and respect.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_953" name="note_953" href="#noteref_953">953.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The duke's speech, interesting as it is, as showing the importance
+attached to gaining the favour of the City, cannot be regarded as historical.—Stubbs,
+Const. Hist., iii, 224 note.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_954" name="note_954" href="#noteref_954">954.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 9, fo. 27.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_955" name="note_955" href="#noteref_955">955.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 9, fo. 33b. The names of the citizens selected for that
+honour are recorded.—<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, fo. 21b. The names also of those who
+attended coronations in the same capacity down to the time of George
+IV are, with one exception (the coronation of Charles I), entered in the
+City's archives.—(See Report on Coronations, presented to Co. Co.,
+18 Aug., 1831. <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Printed</span></span>.)</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_956" name="note_956" href="#noteref_956">956.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, fo. 43.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_957" name="note_957" href="#noteref_957">957.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, fo. 114b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_958" name="note_958" href="#noteref_958">958.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 9, fo. 39.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_959" name="note_959" href="#noteref_959">959.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Green, Hist. of the English People, ii, 63.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_960" name="note_960" href="#noteref_960">960.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Stat. 1 Richard III, c. 9.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_961" name="note_961" href="#noteref_961">961.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, c. 2.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_962" name="note_962" href="#noteref_962">962.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 9, fo. 43b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_963" name="note_963" href="#noteref_963">963.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 9, fo. 56.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_964" name="note_964" href="#noteref_964">964.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Cotton MS. Vitellius A, xvi, fo. 140.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_965" name="note_965" href="#noteref_965">965.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 9, fos. 78b, 81. Richard issued a proclamation against
+Henry "Tydder" on the 23 June, calling upon his subjects to defend
+themselves against his proposed attack.—Paston Letters (Gairdner), iii,
+316-320.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_966" name="note_966" href="#noteref_966">966.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 9, fos. 81b-83b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_967" name="note_967" href="#noteref_967">967.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 9, fos. 84, 85b, 86b; <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Cf.</span></span> "Materials illustrative of the
+reign of Henry VII" (Rolls Series, No. 60), i, 4-6.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_968" name="note_968" href="#noteref_968">968.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Holinshed, iii, 479.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_969" name="note_969" href="#noteref_969">969.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Hecker's "Epidemics of the Middle Ages," p. 168.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_970" name="note_970" href="#noteref_970">970.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 9, fo. 87b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_971" name="note_971" href="#noteref_971">971.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The day for election of mayor varied; at one time it was the
+Feast of the Translation of S. Edward (13 Oct.), at another the Feast of
+SS. Simon and Jude (28 Oct.).</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_972" name="note_972" href="#noteref_972">972.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 9, fo. 88.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_973" name="note_973" href="#noteref_973">973.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, fo. 78b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_974" name="note_974" href="#noteref_974">974.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, fo. 89b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_975" name="note_975" href="#noteref_975">975.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Holinshed, iii, 482, 483; Cotton MS. Vitellius A, xvi, fo. 141b.
+According to Fabyan (p. 683), the Mercers, Grocers and Drapers
+subscribed nearly one half of the loan.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_976" name="note_976" href="#noteref_976">976.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Pol. Verg., 717; "Materials illustrative of the reign of Henry
+VII" (Rolls Series, No. 60), i, 3.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_977" name="note_977" href="#noteref_977">977.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Gairdner's "Henry the Seventh" (Twelve English Statesmen
+Series), p. 47. No record of this appears in the City's archives.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_978" name="note_978" href="#noteref_978">978.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 9, fos. 150b, 151.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_979" name="note_979" href="#noteref_979">979.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, fo. 151.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_980" name="note_980" href="#noteref_980">980.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">He arrived on the 3rd Nov.—Gairdner, p. 57.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_981" name="note_981" href="#noteref_981">981.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 9, fos. 157b, 158.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_982" name="note_982" href="#noteref_982">982.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, fo. 161.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_983" name="note_983" href="#noteref_983">983.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 9, fo. 223b; Cotton MS. Vitellius A, xvi, fo. 142b;
+Fabyan, p. 683; Holinshed, iii, 492.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_984" name="note_984" href="#noteref_984">984.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Henry's second parliament was summoned to meet the 9th Nov.,
+1487. The names of the City's representatives have not come down to
+us, but we know that William White, an alderman, was elected one or
+the members in the place of Thomas Fitz-William, who was chosen
+member for Lincolnshire, and we have the names of six men chosen to
+superintend the City's affairs in this parliament (<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">ad prosequendum in
+parliamento pro negociis civitatis</span></span>), viz:—William Capell, alderman,
+Thomas Bullesdon, Nicholas Alwyn, Simon Harrys, William Brogreve,
+and Thomas Grafton.—Journal 9, fo. 224.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_985" name="note_985" href="#noteref_985">985.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Holinshed, iii, 492.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_986" name="note_986" href="#noteref_986">986.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 9, fo. 273b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_987" name="note_987" href="#noteref_987">987.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Fabyan, p. 684.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_988" name="note_988" href="#noteref_988">988.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 10, fos. 80b, 83; Repertory 1, fos. 10b, 13. The
+"Repertories"—containing minutes of the proceedings of the Court of
+Aldermen, distinct from those of the Common Council—commence in
+1495.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_989" name="note_989" href="#noteref_989">989.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory 1, fo. 19b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_990" name="note_990" href="#noteref_990">990.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Two years later, when the post was held by Arnold Babyngton,
+complaint being made of the noisome smell arising from the burning of
+bones, horns, shavings of leather, &amp;c., in preparing food for the City's
+hounds, near Moorgate, the Common Hunt was allowed a sum of 26<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">s.</span></span> 8<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">d.</span></span>
+in addition to his customary fees for the purpose of supplying wood for
+the purpose.—Repertory 1, fo. 70. The office was maintained as late as
+the year 1807, when it was abolished by order of the Common Council.—Journal
+84, fo. 135b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_991" name="note_991" href="#noteref_991">991.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory 1, fo. 20b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_992" name="note_992" href="#noteref_992">992.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, fos. 20, 20b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_993" name="note_993" href="#noteref_993">993.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 10, fo. 104b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_994" name="note_994" href="#noteref_994">994.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, fo. 105.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_995" name="note_995" href="#noteref_995">995.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, fo. 108.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_996" name="note_996" href="#noteref_996">996.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Fabyan, p. 687.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_997" name="note_997" href="#noteref_997">997.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Cotton MS. Vitellius A, xvi, fo. 176.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_998" name="note_998" href="#noteref_998">998.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory 1, fo. 41b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_999" name="note_999" href="#noteref_999">999.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory 1, fo. 62.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1000" name="note_1000" href="#noteref_1000">1000.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 10, fo. 187b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1001" name="note_1001" href="#noteref_1001">1001.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 10, fo. 190b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1002" name="note_1002" href="#noteref_1002">1002.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, fo. 191.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1003" name="note_1003" href="#noteref_1003">1003.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">This is the date given by Gairdner (p. 198). According to
+Fabyan (p. 687) she arrived on the 4th Oct.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1004" name="note_1004" href="#noteref_1004">1004.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 10, fos. 238, 238b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1005" name="note_1005" href="#noteref_1005">1005.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory 1, fos. 122b-126. The account will be found in Archæol.,
+vol. xxxii, p. 126.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1006" name="note_1006" href="#noteref_1006">1006.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory 1, fos. 130, 130b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1007" name="note_1007" href="#noteref_1007">1007.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">By Stat. 19 Henry VII, c. 7, annulling Stat. 15 Henry VI, c. 6.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1008" name="note_1008" href="#noteref_1008">1008.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory 2, fo. 146.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1009" name="note_1009" href="#noteref_1009">1009.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Charter dated 23 July, 1505, preserved at the Guildhall (Box
+No. 15).</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1010" name="note_1010" href="#noteref_1010">1010.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory 1, fo. 175.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1011" name="note_1011" href="#noteref_1011">1011.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Strype, Stow's "Survey" (1720), bk. ii, p. 193.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1012" name="note_1012" href="#noteref_1012">1012.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory 2, fos. 12, 14; Grey Friars Chron. (Camd. Soc., No.
+53), p. 29.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1013" name="note_1013" href="#noteref_1013">1013.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The sum mentioned by Holinshed (iii. 539), is £1,400; <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Cf.</span></span> Fabyan,
+p. 689.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1014" name="note_1014" href="#noteref_1014">1014.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Baker, in his Chronicle (ed. 1674), p. 248, puts Capel's fine at
+£1,400; <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Cf.</span></span> Fabyan, p. 689; Holinshed, iii, 530; Journal 11, fo. 94.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1015" name="note_1015" href="#noteref_1015">1015.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Fabyan, p. 690.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1016" name="note_1016" href="#noteref_1016">1016.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book M, fo. 138; Journal 11, fo. 28.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1017" name="note_1017" href="#noteref_1017">1017.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 11, fos. 37-39.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1018" name="note_1018" href="#noteref_1018">1018.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Gairdner's "Henry the Seventh," p. 206.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1019" name="note_1019" href="#noteref_1019">1019.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 10, fos. 318, 318b; Repertory 2, fos. 10b-11b. A list of
+"such places as have charged themself and promysed to kepe the yerely
+obit" of Henry VII, as well as a copy of indentures made for the
+assurance of the same obit, with schedule of sums paid to various
+religious houses for the observance of the same, are entered in the City's
+Records.—Repertory 1. fo. 167b; Letter Book P, fo. 186b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1020" name="note_1020" href="#noteref_1020">1020.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The generally accepted day of his death, although the City's
+Archives in one place record it as having taken place on the 21st.—Journal
+2, fo. 67b; <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Cf.</span></span> Fabyan, 690.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1021" name="note_1021" href="#noteref_1021">1021.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Holinshed, iii, 541.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1022" name="note_1022" href="#noteref_1022">1022.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 11, fos. 67b-69.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1023" name="note_1023" href="#noteref_1023">1023.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">"Aldermen barons and presenting barons astate whiche hath been
+Maires."</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1024" name="note_1024" href="#noteref_1024">1024.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 2, fo. 69.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1025" name="note_1025" href="#noteref_1025">1025.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory 11, fo. 68b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1026" name="note_1026" href="#noteref_1026">1026.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letters Patent, dated 9 June, 1509, preserved at the Guildhall
+(Box No. 29).</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1027" name="note_1027" href="#noteref_1027">1027.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book M, fo. 159; Journal 11, fo. 74b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1028" name="note_1028" href="#noteref_1028">1028.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory 2, fo. 68.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1029" name="note_1029" href="#noteref_1029">1029.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 11, fos. 80, 81b, 82; Letter Book M, fo. 160.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1030" name="note_1030" href="#noteref_1030">1030.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 11, fo. 80.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1031" name="note_1031" href="#noteref_1031">1031.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Holinshed, iii, 547.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1032" name="note_1032" href="#noteref_1032">1032.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">According to Holinshed (iii, 567), Parliament opened on the
+25th Jan., 1512. The Parliamentary Returns give the date as the
+4th Feb. with "no returns found." The names of the City's members,
+however, are recorded in the City's Archives. They were Alderman Sir
+William Capell, who had suffered so much at the close of the last reign,
+Richard Broke, the City's new Recorder, William Cawle or Calley,
+draper, and John Kyme, mercer, commoners.—Journal 11, fo. 147b;
+Repertory 2, fo. 125b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1033" name="note_1033" href="#noteref_1033">1033.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The Act for levying the necessary subsidy ordained that every
+alien made a denizen should be rated like a native, but that aliens who
+had not become denizens should be assessed at double the amount at
+which natives were assessed.—See "Historical Introd. to Cal. of
+Denizations and Naturalizations of Aliens in England, 1509-1603."
+(Huguenot Soc.), viii, 7.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1034" name="note_1034" href="#noteref_1034">1034.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 11, fo. 1.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1035" name="note_1035" href="#noteref_1035">1035.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, fo. 1b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1036" name="note_1036" href="#noteref_1036">1036.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 11, fo. 171; Repertory 2, fos. 150b, 172.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1037" name="note_1037" href="#noteref_1037">1037.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory 2, fos. 151b-152.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1038" name="note_1038" href="#noteref_1038">1038.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 11, fo. 2.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1039" name="note_1039" href="#noteref_1039">1039.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory 2, fo. 153.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1040" name="note_1040" href="#noteref_1040">1040.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book M., fo. 257; Repertory 3, fo. 221. In July, 1517,
+the Fellowship of Saddlers of London consented, on the recommendation
+of Archbishop Warham, to refer a matter of dispute between it
+and the parishioners of St. Vedast to the Recorder and Thomas More,
+gentleman, for settlement (Repertory 3, fo. 149); and in Aug., 1521,
+"Thomas More, late of London, gentleman," was bound over, in the
+sum of £20, to appear before the mayor for the time being, to answer
+such charges as might be made against him.—Journal 12, fo. 123.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1041" name="note_1041" href="#noteref_1041">1041.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Roper's Life of Sir Thomas More, pp. 3, 5, 6.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1042" name="note_1042" href="#noteref_1042">1042.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 8, fo. 144; Journal 9, fos. 13, 142b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1043" name="note_1043" href="#noteref_1043">1043.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">William Lichfield, rector of All Hallows the Great, Gilbert
+Worthington, rector of St. Andrew's, Holborn, John Cote, rector of St.
+Peter's, Cornhill, and John Nigel or Neel, master of the hospital of St.
+Thomas de Acon and parson of St. Mary Colechurch.—Rot. Parl. v, 137.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1044" name="note_1044" href="#noteref_1044">1044.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Stow's Survey (Thoms's ed., 1876), p. 42.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1045" name="note_1045" href="#noteref_1045">1045.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Chamber Accounts (Town Clerk's office), i, fos. 202b, 203.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1046" name="note_1046" href="#noteref_1046">1046.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory 2, fos. 121b, 123.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1047" name="note_1047" href="#noteref_1047">1047.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, fo. 126b; Journal 11, fo. 147b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1048" name="note_1048" href="#noteref_1048">1048.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 11, fo. 163; Repertory 2, fos. 133b, 142.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1049" name="note_1049" href="#noteref_1049">1049.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter of Erasmus to Justus Jonas quoted in Lupton's Life of
+Colet, pp. 166, 167.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1050" name="note_1050" href="#noteref_1050">1050.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Survey (Thoms's ed., 1876), p. 28.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1051" name="note_1051" href="#noteref_1051">1051.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">"The number of grammar schools, in various parts of the country,
+which owe their foundation and endowment to the piety and liberality
+of citizens of London ... far exceeds what might be supposed,
+approaching as it does nearly to a hundred."—Preface to Brewer's Life
+of Carpenter, p. xi.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1052" name="note_1052" href="#noteref_1052">1052.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory 3, fo. 46.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1053" name="note_1053" href="#noteref_1053">1053.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, fos. 70b, 71.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1054" name="note_1054" href="#noteref_1054">1054.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, fos. 86, 86b, 88.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1055" name="note_1055" href="#noteref_1055">1055.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory 3, fos. 116, 116b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1056" name="note_1056" href="#noteref_1056">1056.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Wares bought and sold between strangers—"foreign bought and
+sold"—were declared forfeited to the City by Letters Patent of Henry
+VII, 23 July. 1505, confirmed by Henry VIII, 12 July, 1523.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1057" name="note_1057" href="#noteref_1057">1057.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">In 1500, and again in 1516, orders were issued for all freemen to
+return with their families to the city on pain of losing their freedom.—Journal
+10. fos. 181b, 259.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1058" name="note_1058" href="#noteref_1058">1058.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory 3, fos. 141b, 142.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1059" name="note_1059" href="#noteref_1059">1059.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Holinshed, iii, 618.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1060" name="note_1060" href="#noteref_1060">1060.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Or Munday; the name is said to appear in twenty-seven different
+forms. He was a goldsmith by trade, and was appointed (among
+others) by Cardinal Wolsey to report upon the assay of gold and silver
+coinage in 1526.—Journal 13, fo. 45b; Letter Book O, fo. 71b. He
+served sheriff, 1514; and was mayor in 1522.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1061" name="note_1061" href="#noteref_1061">1061.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">In 1462 the Common Council ordered basket-makers, gold wire-drawers,
+and other foreigners plying a craft within the city, to reside
+at Blanchappleton—a manor in the vicinity of Mark Lane—and not
+elsewhere.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1062" name="note_1062" href="#noteref_1062">1062.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory 3, fo. 55b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1063" name="note_1063" href="#noteref_1063">1063.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">For an account of the riot and subsequent proceedings, see
+Holinshed, iii, 621-623, and the Grey Friars Chron. (Camd. Soc.,
+No. 53). p. 30.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1064" name="note_1064" href="#noteref_1064">1064.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory 3, fos. 143, 143b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1065" name="note_1065" href="#noteref_1065">1065.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Holinshed, iii, 624.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1066" name="note_1066" href="#noteref_1066">1066.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory 3, fo. 144b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1067" name="note_1067" href="#noteref_1067">1067.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, fo. 143b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1068" name="note_1068" href="#noteref_1068">1068.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Holinshed, 624.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1069" name="note_1069" href="#noteref_1069">1069.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory 3, fo. 145b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1070" name="note_1070" href="#noteref_1070">1070.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, fo. 145.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1071" name="note_1071" href="#noteref_1071">1071.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory 3, fo. 165.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1072" name="note_1072" href="#noteref_1072">1072.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, fo. 166.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1073" name="note_1073" href="#noteref_1073">1073.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">"Thys yere was much a doo in the yelde-halle for the mayer for
+the comyns wold not have had Semer, for be cause of yell May-day."—Grey
+Friars Chron. (Camd. Soc., No. 53), p. 33.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1074" name="note_1074" href="#noteref_1074">1074.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory 11, fo. 351b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1075" name="note_1075" href="#noteref_1075">1075.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Cal. Letters and Papers, For. and Dom. (Henry VIII), vol. ii,
+pt. i, Pref., p. ccxxi.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1076" name="note_1076" href="#noteref_1076">1076.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, vol. ii, pt. ii, p. 1276.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1077" name="note_1077" href="#noteref_1077">1077.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory 3, fos. 184b, 189b, 191, 192.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1078" name="note_1078" href="#noteref_1078">1078.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book N, fo. 95b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1079" name="note_1079" href="#noteref_1079">1079.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory 3, fos. 192, 194; Letter Book N, fos. 63b, 74.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1080" name="note_1080" href="#noteref_1080">1080.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory 3, fo. 197.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1081" name="note_1081" href="#noteref_1081">1081.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Hall's Chron., pp. 593, 594.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1082" name="note_1082" href="#noteref_1082">1082.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Holinshed, iii, 632.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1083" name="note_1083" href="#noteref_1083">1083.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Cal. Letters and Papers, For. and Dom. (Henry VIII), vol. ii.
+pt. i, Pref., pp. clx, clxi.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1084" name="note_1084" href="#noteref_1084">1084.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">"An order devysed by the Mayer and hys brethrern the aldremen
+by the Kynges commandment for a Tryumphe to be done in the Citie of
+London at the Request of the Right honorable ambassadors of the
+Kynge of Romayns."—10 July, Journal 12, fo. 9.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1085" name="note_1085" href="#noteref_1085">1085.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Hall, pp. 592, 593.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1086" name="note_1086" href="#noteref_1086">1086.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Holinshed, iii, 639.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1087" name="note_1087" href="#noteref_1087">1087.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 12, fos. 125, 172b, 173b; Letter Book N, fo. 194b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1088" name="note_1088" href="#noteref_1088">1088.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Knighted the next day at Greenwich.—Repertory 5, fo. 295.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1089" name="note_1089" href="#noteref_1089">1089.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory 5, fo. 294.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1090" name="note_1090" href="#noteref_1090">1090.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span> 4, fo. 134b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1091" name="note_1091" href="#noteref_1091">1091.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span> 5, fo. 293.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1092" name="note_1092" href="#noteref_1092">1092.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 12, fos. 75b-76; Letter Book N, fos. 142-143.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1093" name="note_1093" href="#noteref_1093">1093.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Grey Friars Chron., p. 30; Repertory 4, fo. 71b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1094" name="note_1094" href="#noteref_1094">1094.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory 4, fos. 1b, 12, 13.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1095" name="note_1095" href="#noteref_1095">1095.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 12, fo. 136.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1096" name="note_1096" href="#noteref_1096">1096.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, fo. 144.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1097" name="note_1097" href="#noteref_1097">1097.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 12, fos. 158, 161, 163b; Letter Book N, fos. 187b, 190b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1098" name="note_1098" href="#noteref_1098">1098.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Holinshed, iii, 675.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1099" name="note_1099" href="#noteref_1099">1099.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Shakespere mentions the Duke's manor thus:—</p>
+
+<div class="tei tei-lg" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em; margin-top: 1.00em">
+<div class="tei tei-l" style="text-align: left; margin-left: 2.00em">"Not long before your highness sped to France,</div>
+<div class="tei tei-l" style="text-align: left; margin-left: 2.00em">The duke being at the Rose, within the parish</div>
+<div class="tei tei-l" style="text-align: left; margin-left: 2.00em">St. Laurence Poultney, did of me demand</div>
+<div class="tei tei-l" style="text-align: left; margin-left: 2.00em">What was the speech among the Londoners</div>
+<div class="tei tei-l" style="text-align: left; margin-left: 2.00em">Concerning the French journey."</div>
+</div>
+
+<p class="tei tei-p" style="text-align: right; margin-bottom: 1.00em">—Henry VIII, act 1, sc. 2.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1100" name="note_1100" href="#noteref_1100">1100.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Cal. Letters and Papers, For. and Dom. (Henry VIII), vol. iii,
+pt. i, Pref., pp. cxxv, cxxvi, cxxxv, cxxxvi.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1101" name="note_1101" href="#noteref_1101">1101.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">On the 5th July steps were taken by the Court of Aldermen for
+putting a stop to the mutinous and seditious words that were current in
+the city "concerning the lamenting and sorrowing of the death of the
+duke"—men saying that he was guiltless—and special precautions were
+taken for the safe custody of weapons and harness for fear of an outbreak.
+The scribe evinced his loyalty by heading the page of the
+record with <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Lex domini immaculata: Vivat Rex Currat L</span></span>.—Repertory
+5, fo. 204.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1102" name="note_1102" href="#noteref_1102">1102.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory 5, fo. 288.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1103" name="note_1103" href="#noteref_1103">1103.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 12, fos. 187b, 188b, 195; Letter Book N, fos. 203b, 204, 208.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1104" name="note_1104" href="#noteref_1104">1104.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory 5, fo. 292.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1105" name="note_1105" href="#noteref_1105">1105.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 12, fo. 187b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1106" name="note_1106" href="#noteref_1106">1106.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory 5, fos. 289, 290.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1107" name="note_1107" href="#noteref_1107">1107.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, fo. 291.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1108" name="note_1108" href="#noteref_1108">1108.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory 5, fos. 296b, 297.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1109" name="note_1109" href="#noteref_1109">1109.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, fo. 294.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1110" name="note_1110" href="#noteref_1110">1110.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">A portion remained unpaid on 16 August.—Journal 12, fo. 195.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1111" name="note_1111" href="#noteref_1111">1111.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter dated 3 Sept.—Journal 12, fo. 196b. On 28 Sept. Wolsey
+asked for more time to repay the loan.—Repertory 5, fo. 326.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1112" name="note_1112" href="#noteref_1112">1112.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 12, fo. 200.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1113" name="note_1113" href="#noteref_1113">1113.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 12, fo. 210.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1114" name="note_1114" href="#noteref_1114">1114.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">See Green's "Hist. of the English People," ii, 121. 122.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1115" name="note_1115" href="#noteref_1115">1115.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Grey Friars Chron., p. 31.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1116" name="note_1116" href="#noteref_1116">1116.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory 4, fo. 144; <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Cf.</span></span> Repertory 6, fo. 20b; Letter Book N,
+fo. 222.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1117" name="note_1117" href="#noteref_1117">1117.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory 4, fo. 145b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1118" name="note_1118" href="#noteref_1118">1118.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Roper's "Life of More," pp. 17-20.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1119" name="note_1119" href="#noteref_1119">1119.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory 4, fos. 152, 168; <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Cf.</span></span> Repertory 6, fo. 38.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1120" name="note_1120" href="#noteref_1120">1120.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory 4, fos. 144b, 145, 146, 150; <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Cf.</span></span> Repertory 6, fos. 22b,
+29, 32b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1121" name="note_1121" href="#noteref_1121">1121.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Grey Friars Chron. pp. 30, 31.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1122" name="note_1122" href="#noteref_1122">1122.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory 4, fos. 153b-154; <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Cf.</span></span> Repertory 6, fo. 42.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1123" name="note_1123" href="#noteref_1123">1123.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory 6, fo. 61b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1124" name="note_1124" href="#noteref_1124">1124.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Holinshed, iii, 692, 693.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1125" name="note_1125" href="#noteref_1125">1125.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 12, fos. 249-250.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1126" name="note_1126" href="#noteref_1126">1126.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 12, fos. 287-288.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1127" name="note_1127" href="#noteref_1127">1127.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, fo. 276.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1128" name="note_1128" href="#noteref_1128">1128.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, fo. 284.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1129" name="note_1129" href="#noteref_1129">1129.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book N, fo. 280; Journal 12, fo. 329.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1130" name="note_1130" href="#noteref_1130">1130.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Grey Friars Chron., p. 32.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1131" name="note_1131" href="#noteref_1131">1131.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Hall's Chron., p. 695.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1132" name="note_1132" href="#noteref_1132">1132.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 12, fo. 331; Letter Book N. fo. 278.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1133" name="note_1133" href="#noteref_1133">1133.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 12, fo. 331b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1134" name="note_1134" href="#noteref_1134">1134.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Hall's Chron., p. 701.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1135" name="note_1135" href="#noteref_1135">1135.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The truce was to last from 14 August to 1 December.—Letter
+Book N, fos. 291, 293; Journal 12, fos. 300, 305.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1136" name="note_1136" href="#noteref_1136">1136.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">"Item in lyke wyse the Chamberleyn shall have allowance of and
+for suche gyftes and presentes as were geven presentyd on Sonday laste
+passyd at the Bysshoppes palace at Paules to the Ambassadours of
+Fraunce devysed and appoynted by my lorde Cardynalles Grace and
+most specyally at his contemplacioun geven for asmoch as lyke
+precedent in so ample maner hath not afore tyme be seen; the presents
+ensue etc."—Repertory 7, fo. 225.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1137" name="note_1137" href="#noteref_1137">1137.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">He had been one of the commoners sent to confer with Wolsey
+touching the amicable loan (Journal 12, fo. 331b). He attended the
+coronation banquet of Anne Boleyn in 1533 (Repertory 9, fo. 2), and
+was M.P. for the city from 1529-1536 (Letter Book O, fo. 157). His
+daughter Elizabeth married Emanuel Lucar, also a merchant-tailor.—Repertory
+9, fos. 139. 140.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1138" name="note_1138" href="#noteref_1138">1138.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory 7, fos. 171b, 172, 174b, 179.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1139" name="note_1139" href="#noteref_1139">1139.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory 7, fos. 179b, 180.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1140" name="note_1140" href="#noteref_1140">1140.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">To the effect that he was not worth £1,000.—Journal 7, fo. 198.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1141" name="note_1141" href="#noteref_1141">1141.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory 7, fos. 238b, 240, 240b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1142" name="note_1142" href="#noteref_1142">1142.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, fo. 243b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1143" name="note_1143" href="#noteref_1143">1143.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory 7, fo. 206. The Common Council assessed the fine at
+£100.—Journal 13, fo. 61b; Letter Book O, fo. 80b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1144" name="note_1144" href="#noteref_1144">1144.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory 7, fo. 264.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1145" name="note_1145" href="#noteref_1145">1145.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 13, fo. 184b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1146" name="note_1146" href="#noteref_1146">1146.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book O, fos. 88b, 89b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1147" name="note_1147" href="#noteref_1147">1147.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Cal. Letters and Papers For. and Dom. (Henry VIII), vol. iv,
+Introd., p. cccclxv.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1148" name="note_1148" href="#noteref_1148">1148.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book O, fos. 174b-175; Journal 13, fo. 180b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1149" name="note_1149" href="#noteref_1149">1149.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book O, fo. 157.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1150" name="note_1150" href="#noteref_1150">1150.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">About the year 1522 Cromwell was living in the city, near Fenchurch,
+combining the business of a merchant with that of a money-lender.
+He sat in the parliament of 1523, and towards the close of
+that year served on a wardmote inquest for Bread Street Ward. In 1524
+he entered Wolsey's service.—Cal. Letters and Papers For. and Dom.
+(Henry VIII.), vol. iii, pt. i, Introd., pp. cclvi, cclvii.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1151" name="note_1151" href="#noteref_1151">1151.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Cal. Letters and Papers For. and Dom. (Henry VIII), vol. iv,
+Introd., pp. dliii-dlvi.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1152" name="note_1152" href="#noteref_1152">1152.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Stat. 21, Henry VIII, caps. 5, 6 and 13.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1153" name="note_1153" href="#noteref_1153">1153.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Proclamation, 12 Sept., 1530.—Letter Book O, fo. 199b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1154" name="note_1154" href="#noteref_1154">1154.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Burnell, "London (City) Tithes Act, 1879," Introd., pp. 1, 2.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1155" name="note_1155" href="#noteref_1155">1155.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book O, fos. 47, <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">seq.</span></span></p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1156" name="note_1156" href="#noteref_1156">1156.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">A list of these, comprising seven churches, was submitted to the
+Court of Aldermen, 23 Feb., 1528.—Repertory 8, fo. 21.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1157" name="note_1157" href="#noteref_1157">1157.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book O, fos. 140b, 141b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1158" name="note_1158" href="#noteref_1158">1158.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory 8, fo. 27b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1159" name="note_1159" href="#noteref_1159">1159.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book O, fos. 145, 145b; Journal 13, fo. 125b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1160" name="note_1160" href="#noteref_1160">1160.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter book P, fos. 31, 34, 41b; Journal 13, fo. 417b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1161" name="note_1161" href="#noteref_1161">1161.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">This order was confirmed by stat. 27, Henry VIII, cap. 21. Ten
+years later a decree was made pursuant to stat. 37, Henry VIII,
+cap. 12, regulating the whole subject of tithes, but owing to the decree
+not having been enrolled in accordance with the terms of the statute,
+much litigation has in recent times arisen.—Burnell, "London (City)
+Tithes Act, 1879," Introd., p. 3.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1162" name="note_1162" href="#noteref_1162">1162.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The well-known and somewhat romantic account of the origin of
+the priory and of its connection with the city cnihten-guild is given in
+Letter Book C, fos. 134b, <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">seq.</span></span>; <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Cf.</span></span> Liber Dunthorn, fo. 79.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1163" name="note_1163" href="#noteref_1163">1163.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Grey Friars Chron. (Camd. Soc., No. 53), p. 35. Three years later
+(30 March, 1534) the Court of Aldermen resolved to wait upon the
+chancellor "to know his mind for the office concerning the lands"
+belonging to the late priory.—Repertory 9, fo. 53b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1164" name="note_1164" href="#noteref_1164">1164.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">By letters patent dated 13 April, 1531 (preserved at the Guildhall,
+Box No. 16).</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1165" name="note_1165" href="#noteref_1165">1165.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Henry Lumnore, Lumnar or Lomner, a grocer by guild as well as
+calling (see Cal. Letters and Papers For. and Dom. (Henry VIII), vol. iii,
+pt. ii, p. 879), was associated with Sidney in holding the beam. The
+City offered to buy him out either by bestowing on him an annuity of
+£10 during the joint lives of himself and Sidney, or else by paying him
+a lump sum of £100.—Repertory 8, fo. 218b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1166" name="note_1166" href="#noteref_1166">1166.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Anne Boleyn.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1167" name="note_1167" href="#noteref_1167">1167.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory 8, fo. 131.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1168" name="note_1168" href="#noteref_1168">1168.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, fos. 142b. 202b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1169" name="note_1169" href="#noteref_1169">1169.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Chapuys to the emperor.—Cal. State Papers (Spanish), vol. iv.,
+pt. ii, p. 646.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1170" name="note_1170" href="#noteref_1170">1170.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory 9, fo. 1b. There is a fine drawing at Berlin by
+Holbein which is thought to be the original design for the triumphal
+arch erected by the merchants of the Steelyard on this occasion.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1171" name="note_1171" href="#noteref_1171">1171.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 13, fo. 371b. According to Wriothesley (Camd. Soc.,
+N.S., No. 11, p. 19) the present to the queen was made to her in a
+purse of cloth of gold on the occasion of her passing through the city
+on the 31st May, the day before her coronation.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1172" name="note_1172" href="#noteref_1172">1172.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory 2, fo. 70b; Repertory 9, fo. 2.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1173" name="note_1173" href="#noteref_1173">1173.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book P, fos. 37-37b; Journal 13, fo. 408b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1174" name="note_1174" href="#noteref_1174">1174.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter to Lord Lisle.—Cal. Letters and Papers For. and Dom.
+(Henry VIII), vol. vii, p. 208.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1175" name="note_1175" href="#noteref_1175">1175.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory 9, fo. 57b. "Allso the same day [20 April] all the
+craftes in London were called to their halls, and there were sworne on
+a booke to be true to Queene Anne and to believe and take her for lawfull
+wife of the Kinge and rightfull Queene of Englande, and utterlie
+to thincke the Lady Marie, daughter to the Kinge by Queene Katherin,
+but as a bastarde, and thus to doe without any scrupulositie of conscience."—Wriothesley's
+Chron., i, 24.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1176" name="note_1176" href="#noteref_1176">1176.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Grey Friars Chron., p. 37. In November of the last year they had
+been made to do penance at Paul's Cross and afterwards at Canterbury.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1177" name="note_1177" href="#noteref_1177">1177.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">"Historia aliquot nostri sæculi martyrum," 1583. Much of it is
+quoted by Father Gasquet in his work on "Henry VIII and the
+English Monasteries" (cap. vi), and also by Mr. Froude ("Hist. of
+England," vol. ii, cap. ix).</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1178" name="note_1178" href="#noteref_1178">1178.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Cal. Letters and Papers For. and Dom. (Henry VIII), vol. vii,
+p. 283.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1179" name="note_1179" href="#noteref_1179">1179.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">This convent—the most virtuous house of religion in England—was
+of the Order of St. Bridget, and received an annual visit from the
+mayor and aldermen of the City of London at what was known as
+"the pardon time of Sion," in the month of August. In return for
+the hospitality bestowed by the lady abbess on these occasions the
+Court of Aldermen occasionally made her presents of wine (Repertories
+3, fo. 94b; 7, fo. 275). In 1517 the court instructed the chamberlain
+to avoid excess of diet on the customary visit. There was to be no
+breakfast on the barge and no swans at dinner (Repertory 3, fo. 154b).
+In 1825 the Court of Common Council decreed (<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">inter alia</span></span>) that "as
+tonchyng the goyng of my lord mayre and my masters his brethern
+the aldermen [to] Syon, yt is sett at large and to be in case as it was
+before the Restreynt" (Journal 12, fo. 302). It was suppressed
+25 Nov., 1539.—Wriothesley's Chron., i, 109.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1180" name="note_1180" href="#noteref_1180">1180.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The Act of Supremacy was passed in 1534, but the king's new
+title as Supreme Head of the Church was not incorporated in his style
+before the 15 Jan., 1535.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1181" name="note_1181" href="#noteref_1181">1181.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Cal. Letters and Papers For. and Dom. (Henry VIII), vol. viii,
+p. 321.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1182" name="note_1182" href="#noteref_1182">1182.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, p. 354.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1183" name="note_1183" href="#noteref_1183">1183.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory 9, fo. 145.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1184" name="note_1184" href="#noteref_1184">1184.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, fo. 199.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1185" name="note_1185" href="#noteref_1185">1185.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">He had been elected mayor for the second time in October last (1535),
+much against his own wish, at the king's express desire.—Journal 13,
+fo. 452b; Wriothesley, i, 31. He presented the City with a collar of SS.
+to be worn by the mayor for the time being.—Repertory 11, fo. 238.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1186" name="note_1186" href="#noteref_1186">1186.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory 9, fos. 199, 199b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1187" name="note_1187" href="#noteref_1187">1187.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory 9, fo. 200.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1188" name="note_1188" href="#noteref_1188">1188.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, fo. 200b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1189" name="note_1189" href="#noteref_1189">1189.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Son of Thomas Warren, fuller; grandson of William Warren, of
+Fering, co. Sussex. He was knighted on the day that his election was
+confirmed by the king (Wriothesley. i, 59). His daughter Joan (by his
+second wife Joan, daughter of John Lake, of London) married Sir Henry
+Williams, <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">alias</span></span> Cromwell (Repertory 14, fo. 180; Journal 17. fo. 137b), by
+whom she had issue Robert Cromwell, father of the Protector. Warren
+died 11 July, 1533, and his widow married Alderman Sir Thomas White.—See
+notes to Machyn's Diary, p. 330.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1190" name="note_1190" href="#noteref_1190">1190.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory 9, fo. 209b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1191" name="note_1191" href="#noteref_1191">1191.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Henry attributed her miscarriage to licentiousness; others to her
+having received a shock at seeing her royal husband thrown from his
+horse whilst tilting at the ring.—Wriothesley, i, 33.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1192" name="note_1192" href="#noteref_1192">1192.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Chapuys to [Granvelle] 25 Aug., 1536.—Cal. Letters and Papers
+For. and Dom. (Henry VIII), vol. xi., p. 145.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1193" name="note_1193" href="#noteref_1193">1193.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Wriothesley, i, 52-53.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1194" name="note_1194" href="#noteref_1194">1194.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book P, fo. 103b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1195" name="note_1195" href="#noteref_1195">1195.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Wriothesley, i, 69.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1196" name="note_1196" href="#noteref_1196">1196.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book P, fo. 135b; Wriothesley, i, 71, 72.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1197" name="note_1197" href="#noteref_1197">1197.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory 10, fos. 152b, 153; Wriothesley, i, 109, 111.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1198" name="note_1198" href="#noteref_1198">1198.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory 10, fo. 161. The circumstance that Henry carried his
+new bride to Westminster by water instead of conducting her thither
+through the streets of the city has been considered a proof of his want
+of regard for her.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1199" name="note_1199" href="#noteref_1199">1199.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Holinshed, iii. 807.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1200" name="note_1200" href="#noteref_1200">1200.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book P, fo. 113; Journal 14, fo. 30b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1201" name="note_1201" href="#noteref_1201">1201.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Stow's "Survey" (Thoms's ed., 1876), p. 68.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1202" name="note_1202" href="#noteref_1202">1202.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The Mercers' Company applied for a grant of the chapel and
+other property of the hospital; and this was conceded by letters patent,
+21 April, 1542, upon payment of the sum of £969 17<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">s.</span></span> 6<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">d.</span></span>, subject to
+a reserved rent of £7 8<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">s.</span></span> 10<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">d.</span></span>, which was redeemed by the company in
+1560.—Livery Comp. Com. (1880), Append. to Report, 1884, vol. ii, p. 9.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1203" name="note_1203" href="#noteref_1203">1203.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">On the re-establishment of the Dutch or Mother Strangers'
+Church, at Elizabeth's accession, it was declared by the Privy Council to
+be under the superintendence of the Bishop of London (Cal. State Papers
+Dom., Feb., 1560). Hence it was that Dr. Temple, Bishop of London,
+was memorialised in March, 1888, as superintendent of the French
+Church in London.—See "Eng. Hist. Review," April, 1891, pp. 388-389.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1204" name="note_1204" href="#noteref_1204">1204.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Stow's "Survey" (Thoms's ed., 1876), p. 67.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1205" name="note_1205" href="#noteref_1205">1205.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Nichols' "Progresses of Queen Eliz.," iii. 598. For particulars of
+Swinnerton see Clode's "Early Hist. of the Merchant Taylors' Company,"
+i, 262, etc.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1206" name="note_1206" href="#noteref_1206">1206.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Strype's Stow, bk. ii, pp. 114, 115.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1207" name="note_1207" href="#noteref_1207">1207.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Remembrancia (Analytical Index), pp. 133, 134.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1208" name="note_1208" href="#noteref_1208">1208.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">In 1439 Reginald Kentwode, Dean of St. Paul's, having in a
+recent visitation discovered "many defaults and excesses," drew up a
+schedule of injunctions for their better regulation.—Printed in London
+and Middlesex Archæol. Soc. Transactions, ii, 200-203.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1209" name="note_1209" href="#noteref_1209">1209.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 12, fo. 75.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1210" name="note_1210" href="#noteref_1210">1210.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory 2, fo. 185b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1211" name="note_1211" href="#noteref_1211">1211.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory 5, fos. 15, 15b, 82b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1212" name="note_1212" href="#noteref_1212">1212.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory 2, fo. 185; Grey Friars Chron., pp. 29, 31.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1213" name="note_1213" href="#noteref_1213">1213.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Sixteen other registers for city parishes commence in 1538, and
+four in 1539.—See Paper on St. James Garlickhithe, by W. D. Cooper,
+F.S.A. (London and Middlesex Arch. Soc. Trans., vol. iii, p. 392, note).</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1214" name="note_1214" href="#noteref_1214">1214.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Wriothesley's Chron. (Camd. Soc, N.S., No. 11), i, 77, 78.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1215" name="note_1215" href="#noteref_1215">1215.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Descended from a Norfolk family. Apprenticed to John Middleton,
+mercer, of London, and admitted to the freedom of the Mercers'
+Company in 1507. Alderman of Walbrook and Cheap Wards
+successively. Sheriff 1531-2. Married (1) Audrey, daughter of William
+Lynne, of Southwick, co. Northampton, (2) Isabella Taverson, <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">née</span></span>
+Worpfall. Was the father of Sir Thomas Gresham, the founder of the
+Royal Exchange and of the college which bears his name.—<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Ob.</span></span>, 21 Feb.,
+1549. Buried in the church of St. Laurence Jewry.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1216" name="note_1216" href="#noteref_1216">1216.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Cott. MS., Cleop. E., iv, fo. 222.—Printed in Burgon's "Life of
+Gresham," i, 26-29.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1217" name="note_1217" href="#noteref_1217">1217.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 14, fo. 129; Letter Book P, fo. 178.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1218" name="note_1218" href="#noteref_1218">1218.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 14, fo. 216b; Letter Book P, fo. 220b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1219" name="note_1219" href="#noteref_1219">1219.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory 10, fo. 200.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1220" name="note_1220" href="#noteref_1220">1220.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 14, fo. 269.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1221" name="note_1221" href="#noteref_1221">1221.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Wriothesley, i, 129.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1222" name="note_1222" href="#noteref_1222">1222.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Son of Thomas Hill, of Hodnet, co. Salop. He devoted large
+sums of money to building causeways and bridges, and erected a
+grammar school at Drayton-in-Hales, otherwise Market Drayton, in his
+native county, which he endowed by will, dated 6 April, 1551 (Cal. of
+Wills, Court of Hust., London, part ii, p. 651). See also Holinshed,
+iii, 1021.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1223" name="note_1223" href="#noteref_1223">1223.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Holinshed, iii, 824; Wriothesley, i, 135. According to the Grey
+Friars Chron. (p. 45), it was the sergeant-at-arms himself whom the
+sheriffs detained.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1224" name="note_1224" href="#noteref_1224">1224.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Proclamation dated 13 Aug., 1543.—Journal 15, fo. 48b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1225" name="note_1225" href="#noteref_1225">1225.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 15, fo. 55; Letter Book Q, fo. 93.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1226" name="note_1226" href="#noteref_1226">1226.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book Q, fo. 92b; Grey Friars Chron., p. 45.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1227" name="note_1227" href="#noteref_1227">1227.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Writ to mayor and sheriffs for proclamation of war, dat. 2 Aug.,
+1543.—Journal 15, fo. 46b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1228" name="note_1228" href="#noteref_1228">1228.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory 11, fo. 32b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1229" name="note_1229" href="#noteref_1229">1229.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory 11, fo. 65b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1230" name="note_1230" href="#noteref_1230">1230.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 15, fo. 95; Repertory 11, fo. 74; Letter Book Q, fo. 109.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1231" name="note_1231" href="#noteref_1231">1231.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">"Memoranda ... relating to the Royal Hospitals," 1863,
+pp. 4-7.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1232" name="note_1232" href="#noteref_1232">1232.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory 11, fo. 106; Letter Book Q, fo. 116b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1233" name="note_1233" href="#noteref_1233">1233.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory, 11, fo. 118b; Letter Book Q, fo. 120b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1234" name="note_1234" href="#noteref_1234">1234.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 15, fo. 123; Letter Book Q, fo. 119.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1235" name="note_1235" href="#noteref_1235">1235.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 15, fo. 124; Letter Book Q, fo. 122.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1236" name="note_1236" href="#noteref_1236">1236.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book Q, fo. 120b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1237" name="note_1237" href="#noteref_1237">1237.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Wriothesley, i, 151, 153; Grey Friars Chron., p. 48.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1238" name="note_1238" href="#noteref_1238">1238.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Holinshed, iii, 346.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1239" name="note_1239" href="#noteref_1239">1239.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Wriothesley, i, 151, 152.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1240" name="note_1240" href="#noteref_1240">1240.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 15, fo. 239b; Letter Book Q, fo. 167b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1241" name="note_1241" href="#noteref_1241">1241.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 15, fo. 240.; Letter Book Q, fo. 168; Wriothesley, i, 154.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1242" name="note_1242" href="#noteref_1242">1242.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">"A coarse frieze was so called from a small town in the West
+Riding of Yorkshire. An Act of 5 and 6 Edward VI (1551-2) provided
+that all "clothes commonly called Pennystones or Forest Whites ... shall
+conteyne in length beinge wett betwixt twelve and thirtene
+yardes."</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1243" name="note_1243" href="#noteref_1243">1243.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory 11, fo. 193b; Letter Book Q, fo. 133; Wriothesley,
+i, 154.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1244" name="note_1244" href="#noteref_1244">1244.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Wriothesley, i, 155.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1245" name="note_1245" href="#noteref_1245">1245.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory 11, fos. 203, 212b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1246" name="note_1246" href="#noteref_1246">1246.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">30 July.—Repertory 11, fo. 215b. The Midsummer watch had
+not been kept this year.—Wriothesley, i, 156.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1247" name="note_1247" href="#noteref_1247">1247.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory 11, fo. 213.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1248" name="note_1248" href="#noteref_1248">1248.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Wriothesley, i, 58.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1249" name="note_1249" href="#noteref_1249">1249.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory 11, fo. 216b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1250" name="note_1250" href="#noteref_1250">1250.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Stat. 37, Henry VIII, c. 4.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1251" name="note_1251" href="#noteref_1251">1251.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory 11, fo. 299b; Letter Book Q, fo. 181; Journal 15, fo.
+270; Wriothesley, i, 165.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1252" name="note_1252" href="#noteref_1252">1252.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Holinshed, iii, 856; Grey Friars Chron., p. 50.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1253" name="note_1253" href="#noteref_1253">1253.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Holinshed, iii, 847.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1254" name="note_1254" href="#noteref_1254">1254.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book Q, fo. 181.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1255" name="note_1255" href="#noteref_1255">1255.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory 11, fo. 247.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1256" name="note_1256" href="#noteref_1256">1256.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 15, fo. 213b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1257" name="note_1257" href="#noteref_1257">1257.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Wriothesley, i, 162, 175.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1258" name="note_1258" href="#noteref_1258">1258.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 15, fos. 245, 399b, <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">seq.</span></span></p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1259" name="note_1259" href="#noteref_1259">1259.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">"Memoranda ... Royal Hospitals," pp. 20-45.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1260" name="note_1260" href="#noteref_1260">1260.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory 11, fo. 349b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1261" name="note_1261" href="#noteref_1261">1261.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">In Sept., 1547, the citizens were called upon to contribute half a
+fifteenth for the maintenance of the poor of St. Bartholomew's.—Journal
+15, fo. 325b. In Dec, 1548, an annual sum of 500 marks out of the
+profits of Blackwell, and in 1557 the whole of the same profits were set
+aside for the poor.—Journal 15, fos. 398, <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">seq.</span></span>; Repertory 13, pt. ii,
+fo. 512.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1262" name="note_1262" href="#noteref_1262">1262.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Royal proclamation, 7 July, 1545, forbidding all pursuit of game
+in Westminster, Islington, Highgate, Hornsey and elsewhere in the
+suburbs of London.—Journal 15, fo. 240b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1263" name="note_1263" href="#noteref_1263">1263.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Son of Christopher Huberthorne, of Waddington, co. Lane,
+Alderman of Farringdon Within. His mansion adjoined the Leadenhall.
+<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Ob.</span></span>, Oct., 1556. Buried in the church of St. Peter, Cornhill.—Machyn.
+115, 352. It was in Huberthorne's mayoralty that the customary banquet
+to the aldermen, the "officers lerned" and the commoners of the city, on
+Monday next after the Feast of Epiphany, known as "Plow Monday,"
+was discontinued.—Letter Book Q, fo. 191b. It was afterwards renewed
+and continues to this day in the form of a dinner given by the
+new mayor to the officers of his household and clerks engaged in various
+departments of the service of the Corporation. An attempt was at the
+same time made to put down the lord mayor's banquet also.—Wriothesley,
+i, 176.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1264" name="note_1264" href="#noteref_1264">1264.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 15. fos. 303b, 305b; Letter Book Q, os. 192b, 194;
+Wriothesley. i, 178.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1265" name="note_1265" href="#noteref_1265">1265.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 15, fo. 304; Letter Book Q, fo. 195; Repertory 11,
+fo. 335b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1266" name="note_1266" href="#noteref_1266">1266.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">"The lord mayor of London, Henry Hobulthorne, was called
+fourth, who kneeling before the king, his majestie tooke the sworde of
+the Lord Protector and made him knight, which was the first that eaver
+he made."—Wriothesley's Chron. (Camd. Soc, N.S., No. 11.), i, 181.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1267" name="note_1267" href="#noteref_1267">1267.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">This mace is still in possession of the Corporation. It is only
+brought out for use on such occasions as a coronation, when it is carried
+by the lord mayor as on the occasion narrated above, and at the annual
+election of the chief magistrate of the city, when it is formally handed
+by the Chamberlain to the lord mayor elect. The mace consists of a
+tapering shaft of rock crystal mounted in gold, with a coroneted head
+also of gold, adorned with pearls and large jewels. Its age is uncertain.
+Whilst some hazard the conjecture that it may be of Saxon origin,
+there are others who are of opinion that the head of it at least cannot
+be earlier than the 15th century.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1268" name="note_1268" href="#noteref_1268">1268.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 15, fo. 305; Letter Book Q, fos. 195b-196; Repertory 11,
+fo. 334b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1269" name="note_1269" href="#noteref_1269">1269.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">"All these chyldren shall every Chyldermasse day come to Paulis
+Church and here the chylde bisshoppis sermon, and after be at the hye
+masse, and eche of them offer a 1<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="vertical-align: super">d.</span></span> to the childe bisshop and with theme
+the maisters and surveyors of the scole."—Statutes of St. Paul's School,
+printed in Lupton's "Life of Dean Colet," p. 278b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1270" name="note_1270" href="#noteref_1270">1270.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book P, fo. 172b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1271" name="note_1271" href="#noteref_1271">1271.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 14, fo. 158b; Letter Book P, fo. 197.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1272" name="note_1272" href="#noteref_1272">1272.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">See Brewer's Introd. to Cal. Letters and Papers For. and Dom.,
+vol. iv, pp. dcli-dcliii.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1273" name="note_1273" href="#noteref_1273">1273.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book P, fo. 153.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1274" name="note_1274" href="#noteref_1274">1274.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book Q, fo. 102.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1275" name="note_1275" href="#noteref_1275">1275.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">"Also this same tyme [Nov., 1547] was moche spekying agayne
+the sacrament of the auter, that some callyd it Jacke of the boxe, with
+divers other shamefulle names... And at this tyme [Easter, 1548]
+was more prechyng agayne the masse."—Grey Friars Chron., p. 55.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1276" name="note_1276" href="#noteref_1276">1276.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book Q, fo. 250b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1277" name="note_1277" href="#noteref_1277">1277.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory 11, fo. 423.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1278" name="note_1278" href="#noteref_1278">1278.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">"After the redyng of the preposycioun made yesterday in the Sterre
+Chamber by the lorde chaunceler and y<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="vertical-align: super">e</span></span> declaracioun made by my lorde
+mayer of suche comunicacioun as his lordshyp had w<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="vertical-align: super">t</span></span> the Bysshop of
+Caunterburye concernyng the demeano<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="vertical-align: super">r</span></span> of certein prechers and other
+dysobedyent persones yt was ordered and agreyd that my lorde mayer
+and all my maisters thaldermen shall this afternone att ij of y<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="vertical-align: super">e</span></span> clok
+repayre to my lorde protectors grace and the hole counseill and declare
+unto theim the seid mysdemeanor and that thei shall mete att Saint
+Martyns in the Vyntrey att one of the clok."—Repertory 11, fo. 456b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1279" name="note_1279" href="#noteref_1279">1279.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory 11, fo. 465.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1280" name="note_1280" href="#noteref_1280">1280.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">A proclamation against the evil behaviour of citizens and others
+against priests, 12 Nov., 1547.—Letter Book Q. fo. 218; Journal 15,
+fo. 335b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1281" name="note_1281" href="#noteref_1281">1281.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">By letters patent dated 14 July, 1550 (preserved at the Guildhall,
+Box 17).</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1282" name="note_1282" href="#noteref_1282">1282.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book R, fo. 166b; Wriothesley's Chron. (Camden Soc.,
+N.S., No. 20), ii, 35. See also exemplification of Act of Parl. passed
+a° 5 Edward VI, in accordance with the terms of this petition (Box 29).</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1283" name="note_1283" href="#noteref_1283">1283.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 15, fo. 322; Letter Book Q, fo. 210b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1284" name="note_1284" href="#noteref_1284">1284.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory 11. fo. 373; Letter Book Q, fo. 214.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1285" name="note_1285" href="#noteref_1285">1285.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Grey Friars Chron., 54, 55; Wriothesley. ii, 1.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1286" name="note_1286" href="#noteref_1286">1286.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Grey Friars Chron., p. 58. In May (1548) the duke applied to the
+City for water to be laid on to Stronde House, afterwards known as
+Somerset House.—Repertory 11, fos. 462b, 484; Journal 15. fo. 383b;
+Letter Book Q, fo. 253b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1287" name="note_1287" href="#noteref_1287">1287.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Grey Friars Chron., p. 55.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1288" name="note_1288" href="#noteref_1288">1288.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Wriothesley, ii, 29. Touching the ceremony of visiting the tomb
+of the Bishop of London, to whom the citizens were indebted for the
+charter of William the Conqueror, see chap. i, p. 35.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1289" name="note_1289" href="#noteref_1289">1289.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book Q, fos. 232, 234b; Repertory 11, fos. 356, 415, 431,
+444b, 511b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1290" name="note_1290" href="#noteref_1290">1290.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">"Item, at this same tyme [<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">circ.</span></span> Sept., 1547] was pullyd up alle the
+tomes, grett stones, alle the auteres, with stalles and walles of the qweer
+and auters in the church that was some tyme the Gray freeres, and solde
+and the qweer made smaller."—Grey Friars Chron., p. 54.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1291" name="note_1291" href="#noteref_1291">1291.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">"At Ester followyng there began the commonion, and confession
+but of thoys that wolde, as the boke dothe specifythe."—Grey Friars
+Chron., p. 55; <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Cf.</span></span> Wriothesley (Camd. Soc, N.S., No. 20), ii, 2.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1292" name="note_1292" href="#noteref_1292">1292.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The Guildhall college, chapel and library were restored to the
+City in 1550, by Edward VI, on payment of £456 13<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">s.</span></span> 4<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">d.</span></span>,—Pat. Roll
+4 Edward VI, p. 9m. (32) 20; Letter Book R, fo. 64b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1293" name="note_1293" href="#noteref_1293">1293.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory 11, fo. 493b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1294" name="note_1294" href="#noteref_1294">1294.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, fo. 455. (431 pencil mark); Letter Book Q, fo. 237. "This
+yeare in the Whitson holidaies my lord maior [Sir John Gresham]
+caused three notable sermons to be made at Sainct Marie Spittell,
+according as they are kept at Easter.... And the sensing in
+Poules cleene put downe."—Wriothesley, ii, 2, 3. The processions
+were kept up in 1554, "but there was no sensynge."—Grey Friars
+Chron., p. 89.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1295" name="note_1295" href="#noteref_1295">1295.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Cf.</span></span> Journal 15, fo. 352b; Letter Book Q, fos. 230-252b. "This
+yeare [1548] the xxviii<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="vertical-align: super">th</span></span> daie of September, proclamation was made to
+inhibite all preachers generallie till the kinges further pleasure. After
+which daie all sermons seasede at Poules Crosse and in all other
+places."—Wriothesley, ii, 6.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1296" name="note_1296" href="#noteref_1296">1296.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Grey Friars Chron., pp. 59, 62. Occasionally the chronicler is
+overcome by his feelings, and cries out, "Almyghty God helpe it whan
+hys wylle ys!" <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, p. 67.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1297" name="note_1297" href="#noteref_1297">1297.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">In some cases the new owners may have experienced some difficulty
+in fixing a fair rent, as appears to have been the case with the City of
+London and its recently acquired property of Bethlehem. When the
+Chamberlain reported that the rents demanded for houses in the
+precincts of the hospital were far too high, he was at once authorised
+to reduce them at discretion.—Letter Book R, fo. 10b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1298" name="note_1298" href="#noteref_1298">1298.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book R, fo. 11b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1299" name="note_1299" href="#noteref_1299">1299.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Grey Friars Chron., p. 60; Wriothesley, ii, 15, 16.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1300" name="note_1300" href="#noteref_1300">1300.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Wriothesley, ii, 16, 17; Grey Friars Chron., p. 60.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1301" name="note_1301" href="#noteref_1301">1301.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Wriothesley, ii, 19.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1302" name="note_1302" href="#noteref_1302">1302.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Wriothesley, ii, 20; Grey Friars Chron., p. 61.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1303" name="note_1303" href="#noteref_1303">1303.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Holinshed, iii, 982-984.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1304" name="note_1304" href="#noteref_1304">1304.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book R, fo. 40; Journal 16, fo. 36.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1305" name="note_1305" href="#noteref_1305">1305.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book R, fo. 39b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1306" name="note_1306" href="#noteref_1306">1306.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Acts of the Privy Council, ii, 331-332; Wriothesley, ii, 24-25;
+Holinshed, iii, 1014; Repertory 12, pt. i, fos. 149-150.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1307" name="note_1307" href="#noteref_1307">1307.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Holinshed, iii, 1014-1015; Acts of Privy Council, ii, 333.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1308" name="note_1308" href="#noteref_1308">1308.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Acts of Privy Council, ii, fos. 333-336.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1309" name="note_1309" href="#noteref_1309">1309.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory 12, pt. i, fo. 150b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1310" name="note_1310" href="#noteref_1310">1310.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book R, fo. 40b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1311" name="note_1311" href="#noteref_1311">1311.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, fos. 43-43b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1312" name="note_1312" href="#noteref_1312">1312.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Acts of Privy Council, ii, 336, 337.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1313" name="note_1313" href="#noteref_1313">1313.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Wriothesley, ii, 26.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1314" name="note_1314" href="#noteref_1314">1314.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Acts of Privy Council, ii, 337-342.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1315" name="note_1315" href="#noteref_1315">1315.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book R, fos. 41-42; Journal 16, fos. 37, 37b. According
+to Holinshed (iii, 1017, 1018), considerable opposition was made by a
+member of the Common Council named George Stadlow to any force at
+all being sent by the city. He reminded the court of the evils that had
+arisen in former times from the city rendering support to the barons
+against Henry III, and how the city lost its liberties in consequence.
+The course he recommended was that the city should join the lords in
+making a humble representation to the king as to the Protector's conduct.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1316" name="note_1316" href="#noteref_1316">1316.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Wriothesley, ii, 26, 27.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1317" name="note_1317" href="#noteref_1317">1317.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book R, fo. 37; Journal 16, fo. 34; Wriothesley, ii, 26.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1318" name="note_1318" href="#noteref_1318">1318.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Stow's "Summarie of the Chronicles of England" (ed. 1590),
+p. 545; Wriothesley, ii, 27, 28. The names are given differently in the
+Acts of the Privy Council, ii, 344.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1319" name="note_1319" href="#noteref_1319">1319.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Grey Friars Chron., pp. 63, 64; <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Cf.</span></span> Wriothesley, ii, 24.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1320" name="note_1320" href="#noteref_1320">1320.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Wriothesley, ii, 28.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1321" name="note_1321" href="#noteref_1321">1321.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Acts of Privy Council, ii, 384; Wriothesley, ii, 33.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1322" name="note_1322" href="#noteref_1322">1322.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">For more than a week he had been compelled to lie on nothing
+but straw, his bed having been taken away by order of the knight
+marshal for refusing to pay an extortionate fee.—Grey Friars Chron.,
+p. 65.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1323" name="note_1323" href="#noteref_1323">1323.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Thomas Thurlby, the last abbot of Westminster, became the first
+and only bishop of the see. Upon the union of the see with that of
+London Thurlby became bishop of Norwich. Among the archives of
+the city there is a release by him, in his capacity as bishop of Westminster,
+and the dean and chapter of the same, to the City of London
+of the parish church of St. Nicholas, Shambles. The document is dated
+14 March, 1549, and has the seals of the bishopric and of the dean and
+chapter, in excellent preservation, appended.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1324" name="note_1324" href="#noteref_1324">1324.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">For objecting to the prescribed vestments, he was committed to
+the Fleet by order of the Privy Council, 27 Jan., 1551, and was not
+consecrated until the following 8th March.—Hooper to Bullinger,
+1 Aug., 1551 ("Original Letters relative to the English Reformation." ed.
+for Parker Society, 1846, p. 91).</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1325" name="note_1325" href="#noteref_1325">1325.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Their respective boundaries are set out in the Report of Commissioners
+on Municipal Corporations (1837), p. 3.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1326" name="note_1326" href="#noteref_1326">1326.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Charter dated 6 March, 1 Edward III.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1327" name="note_1327" href="#noteref_1327">1327.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Charter dated 9 Nov., 2 Edward IV.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1328" name="note_1328" href="#noteref_1328">1328.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book Q, fos. 239b-241b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1329" name="note_1329" href="#noteref_1329">1329.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book R, fo. 58b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1330" name="note_1330" href="#noteref_1330">1330.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Dated 23 April, 1550. A fee of £6 "and odde money" was
+paid for the enrolment of this charter in the Exchequer.—Repertory 12,
+pt. ii, fo. 458. This fee appears to have been paid, notwithstanding
+the express terms of the charter that no fee great or small should be
+paid or made or by any means given to the hanaper to the king's use.
+According to Wriothesley (ii, 36), the "purchase" of Southwark cost the
+city 1,000 marks, "so that nowe they shall have all the whole towne of
+Southwarke by letters patent as free as they have the City of London, the
+Kinges Place [<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">i.e.</span></span> Southwark Place or Suffolk House] and the two
+prison houses of the Kinges Bench and the Marshalsea excepted."</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1331" name="note_1331" href="#noteref_1331">1331.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Wriothesley, ii, 38.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1332" name="note_1332" href="#noteref_1332">1332.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book R, fo. 80; Journal 16, fo. 82b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1333" name="note_1333" href="#noteref_1333">1333.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The custom in the city was for the inhabitants of a vacant ward
+to nominate four persons for the Court of Aldermen to select one. As
+there were no means of enforcing the above ordinance it was repealed
+by Act of Co. Co., 16 June, 1558.—Letter Book S., fo. 167b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1334" name="note_1334" href="#noteref_1334">1334.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book R, fo. 71b. The following particulars of Aylyff and
+his family are drawn from the city's archives. From Bridge Ward
+Without he removed to Dowgate Ward. At the time of his death, in
+1556, he was keeper of the clothmarket at Blackwell Hall. His
+widow was allowed to take the issues and profits of her late husband's
+place for one week, and was forgiven a quarter's rent. Aylyff's son
+Erkenwald succeeded him at Blackwell Hall. The son died in 1561.
+After his decease he was convicted of having forged a deed. His
+widow, Dorothy, married Henry Butler, "gentleman."—Repertory 13,
+pt. ii, fos. 442b, 443, 461; Repertory 14, fos. 446b, 477b, 478;
+Repertory 16, fo. 6b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1335" name="note_1335" href="#noteref_1335">1335.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Printed Report. Co. Co., 20 May, 1836.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1336" name="note_1336" href="#noteref_1336">1336.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">See Report Committee of the whole Court for General Purposes,
+with Appendix, 31 May, 1892 (<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Printed</span></span>).</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1337" name="note_1337" href="#noteref_1337">1337.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Grey Friars Chron., p. 66. The surrender of Boulogne was "sore
+lamented of all Englishmen."—Wriothesley, ii, 37.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1338" name="note_1338" href="#noteref_1338">1338.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory 12, pt. ii, fo. 271b; Letter Book R, fos. 74, 85b;
+Journal 16, fos. 66b, 91b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1339" name="note_1339" href="#noteref_1339">1339.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book R, fo. 115; Journal 16, fo. 118.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1340" name="note_1340" href="#noteref_1340">1340.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Wriothesley, ii, 48. The price of living became so dear that the
+town clerk and the under-sheriffs asked for and obtained from the
+Common Council an increase of emoluments.—Letter Book R, fo. 117b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1341" name="note_1341" href="#noteref_1341">1341.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Wriothesley, ii, 54.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1342" name="note_1342" href="#noteref_1342">1342.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Grey Friars Chron., p. 72.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1343" name="note_1343" href="#noteref_1343">1343.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Wriothesley, ii, 56; Grey Friars Chron., p. 71.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1344" name="note_1344" href="#noteref_1344">1344.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Grey Friars Chron., pp. 72, 73.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1345" name="note_1345" href="#noteref_1345">1345.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, pp. 71, 72.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1346" name="note_1346" href="#noteref_1346">1346.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Wriothesley, ii, 57.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1347" name="note_1347" href="#noteref_1347">1347.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory 12, pt. ii, fo. 426; Letter Book R, fo. 157b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1348" name="note_1348" href="#noteref_1348">1348.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Wriothesley, ii, 63.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1349" name="note_1349" href="#noteref_1349">1349.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Holinshed, iii, 1032.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1350" name="note_1350" href="#noteref_1350">1350.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 15, fo. 325b; Letter Book Q, fo. 214b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1351" name="note_1351" href="#noteref_1351">1351.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book Q, fo. 237; Repertory 11, fo. 445b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1352" name="note_1352" href="#noteref_1352">1352.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 15, fo. 384.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1353" name="note_1353" href="#noteref_1353">1353.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book Q, fo. 261b; Journal 15, fos. 398, 401; Appendix vii
+to "Memoranda of the Royal Hospitals," pp. 46-51.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1354" name="note_1354" href="#noteref_1354">1354.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory 12, pt. ii., fos. 311, 312b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1355" name="note_1355" href="#noteref_1355">1355.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Both deeds are printed in Supplement to Memoranda relating to
+Royal Hospitals, pp. 15-32.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1356" name="note_1356" href="#noteref_1356">1356.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Son of Robert Dobbs, of Batley, Yorks. Alderman of Tower
+Ward. Knighted 8 May, 1552. <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Ob.</span></span> 1556. Buried in Church of
+St. Margaret Moses.—Machyn, pp. 105, 269, 349; Wriothesley, ii, 69.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1357" name="note_1357" href="#noteref_1357">1357.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Report, Charity Commissioners, No. 32, pt. vi, p. 75; Strype,
+Stow's "Survey," bk. i, p. 176.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1358" name="note_1358" href="#noteref_1358">1358.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Among the names of those forming the deputation appears that
+of Richard Grafton, whose printing house, from which issued "The
+Prymer"—one of the earliest books of private devotion printed in
+English as well as Latin—was situate within the precinct of the Old
+Grey Friars.—Repertory 12, p. ii., fos. 271b, 272b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1359" name="note_1359" href="#noteref_1359">1359.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Strype, Stow's "Survey," bk. i, p. 176.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1360" name="note_1360" href="#noteref_1360">1360.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Wriothesley, 83; Repertory 13, fo. 60.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1361" name="note_1361" href="#noteref_1361">1361.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Charter dated 26 June, 1553.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1362" name="note_1362" href="#noteref_1362">1362.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">"Letters Patent for the limitation of the Crown," sometimes
+called the "counterfeit will" of King Edward VI.—Chron. of Q. Jane
+and Q. Mary (Camd. Soc., No. 48), pp. 91-100.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1363" name="note_1363" href="#noteref_1363">1363.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Richard Hilles to Henry Bullinger, 9 July, 1553.—"Original
+letters relative to the English Reformation" (Parker Soc.), pp. 272-274.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1364" name="note_1364" href="#noteref_1364">1364.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Grey Friars Chron., pp. 78, 79.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1365" name="note_1365" href="#noteref_1365">1365.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Wriothesley, ii, 88-90.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1366" name="note_1366" href="#noteref_1366">1366.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book R, fo. 262b; Repertory 13, pt. i, fo. 68.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1367" name="note_1367" href="#noteref_1367">1367.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Wriothesley, ii, 90, 91; Grey Friars Chron., p. 81.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1368" name="note_1368" href="#noteref_1368">1368.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory 13, pt. i, fo. 69.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1369" name="note_1369" href="#noteref_1369">1369.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, fo. 70b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1370" name="note_1370" href="#noteref_1370">1370.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory 13, pt. i, fo. 69b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1371" name="note_1371" href="#noteref_1371">1371.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Wriothesley, 93-95.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1372" name="note_1372" href="#noteref_1372">1372.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Chron. of Q. Jane and Q. Mary, p. 14; Wriothesley, ii, 95.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1373" name="note_1373" href="#noteref_1373">1373.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Grey Friars Chron., p. 83; Wriothesley, ii, 96-98.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1374" name="note_1374" href="#noteref_1374">1374.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Chron. of Q. Jane and Q. Mary, p. 24.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1375" name="note_1375" href="#noteref_1375">1375.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book R, fo. 270; Journal 16, fo. 261b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1376" name="note_1376" href="#noteref_1376">1376.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Wriothesley, ii, 99, 100; Holinshed, iv, 3.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1377" name="note_1377" href="#noteref_1377">1377.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Citizen and Merchant Taylor. Son of William White, of Reading,
+and formerly of Rickmansworth. Founder of St. John's College,
+Oxford, and principal benefactor of Merchant Taylors' School. Alderman
+of Cornhill Ward; when first elected alderman he declined to
+accept office and was committed to Newgate for contumacy (Letter
+Book Q, fo. 109b; Repertory 11, fo. 80b). Sheriff 1547. Knighted
+at Whitehall 10 Dec., 1553 (Wriothesley, ii, 105). His first wife, Avice
+(surname unknown), died 26 Feb., 1588, and was buried in the church
+of St. Mary Aldermary. He afterwards married Joan, daughter of
+John Lake and widow of Sir Ralph Warren, twice Mayor of London.
+<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Ob.</span></span> 11 Feb., 1566, at Oxford, aged 72.—Clode, "Early Hist. Guild of
+Merchant Taylors," pt. ii, chaps. x-xii; Machyn's Diary, pp. 167,
+330, 363.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1378" name="note_1378" href="#noteref_1378">1378.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 16, fo. 261; Repertory 13, pt. i, fo. 74b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1379" name="note_1379" href="#noteref_1379">1379.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Grey Friars Chron., p. 84.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1380" name="note_1380" href="#noteref_1380">1380.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Met in October, 1553. The names of the city's representatives
+are not recorded. The Court of Aldermen, according to a custom then
+prevalent, authorized the city chamberlain to make a gift of £6 13<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">s.</span></span> 4<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">d.</span></span>
+to Sir John Pollard, the Speaker, "for his lawfull favor to be borne
+and shewed in the parlyment howse towardes this cytie and theyre
+affayres theire."—Repertory 13, pt. i, fo. 92.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1381" name="note_1381" href="#noteref_1381">1381.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Grey Friars Chron., p. 85; Wriothesley, ii, 104; Chron. Q. Jane
+and Q. Mary, p. 32. There is preserved in the British Museum a small
+manual of prayers believed to have been used by Lady Jane Grey on
+the scaffold. The tiny volume (Harl. MS., 2342) measures only
+3-1/2 inches by 2-3/4 inches, and contains on the margin lines addressed to
+Sir John Gage, lieutenant of the Tower, and to her father, the Duke
+of Suffolk.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1382" name="note_1382" href="#noteref_1382">1382.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 16, fo. 283.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1383" name="note_1383" href="#noteref_1383">1383.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Chron. of Q. Jane and Q. Mary, 35.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1384" name="note_1384" href="#noteref_1384">1384.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Wriothesley, ii, 106.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1385" name="note_1385" href="#noteref_1385">1385.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory 13, pt. i, fos. 116, 116b, 117, 117b, 119-122b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1386" name="note_1386" href="#noteref_1386">1386.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Wriothesley, ii, 107.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1387" name="note_1387" href="#noteref_1387">1387.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory 13, pt. i, fo. 121.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1388" name="note_1388" href="#noteref_1388">1388.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Foxe's "Acts and Monuments," vi, 414-415; Holinshed, iv, 16.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1389" name="note_1389" href="#noteref_1389">1389.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Holinshed, iv, 15.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1390" name="note_1390" href="#noteref_1390">1390.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory 13, pt. i, fo. 124.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1391" name="note_1391" href="#noteref_1391">1391.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Wriothesley, iii, 109.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1392" name="note_1392" href="#noteref_1392">1392.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Stow.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1393" name="note_1393" href="#noteref_1393">1393.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Foxe's "Acts and Monuments," vi, 415.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1394" name="note_1394" href="#noteref_1394">1394.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Grey Friars Chron., p. 87.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1395" name="note_1395" href="#noteref_1395">1395.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Chron. of Q. Jane and Q. Mary, p. 43; Wriothesley, iii, 107, 108.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1396" name="note_1396" href="#noteref_1396">1396.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Grey Friars Chron., p. 87.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1397" name="note_1397" href="#noteref_1397">1397.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Machyn, 45. The gibbets remained standing till the following
+June, when they were taken down in anticipation of Philip's public
+entry into London.—Chron. of Q. Jane and Q. Mary, 76.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1398" name="note_1398" href="#noteref_1398">1398.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Grey Friars Chron., p. 89.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1399" name="note_1399" href="#noteref_1399">1399.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 16, fo. 283; Letter Book R, fo. 288.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1400" name="note_1400" href="#noteref_1400">1400.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory 13, pt. i, fo. 131.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1401" name="note_1401" href="#noteref_1401">1401.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Holinshed, iv, 26.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1402" name="note_1402" href="#noteref_1402">1402.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory 13, pt. i, fo. 153; Letter Book R, fo. 293.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1403" name="note_1403" href="#noteref_1403">1403.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory 13, pt. i, fo. 130; Journal 16, fo. 284b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1404" name="note_1404" href="#noteref_1404">1404.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory 13, pt. i, fo. 138b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1405" name="note_1405" href="#noteref_1405">1405.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, fos. 142b, 146b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1406" name="note_1406" href="#noteref_1406">1406.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, fo. 147.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1407" name="note_1407" href="#noteref_1407">1407.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Wriothesley, ii, 115.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1408" name="note_1408" href="#noteref_1408">1408.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory 13, pt. i, fo. 186b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1409" name="note_1409" href="#noteref_1409">1409.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, fo. 190b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1410" name="note_1410" href="#noteref_1410">1410.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Howell's "State Trials," i, 901, 902; Chron. of Q. Jane and
+Q. Mary, p. 75.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1411" name="note_1411" href="#noteref_1411">1411.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">It sat from 2 April until 5 May.—Wriothesley, ii, 114, 115. The
+city returned the same members that had served in the last parliament
+of Edward VI, namely, Martin Bowes, Broke the Recorder, John Marsh
+and John Blundell.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1412" name="note_1412" href="#noteref_1412">1412.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 16, fo. 295b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1413" name="note_1413" href="#noteref_1413">1413.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory 13, pt. i, fos. 165, 166, 166b, 170.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1414" name="note_1414" href="#noteref_1414">1414.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Chron. of Q. Jane and Q. Mary, p. 77.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1415" name="note_1415" href="#noteref_1415">1415.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, p. 78.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1416" name="note_1416" href="#noteref_1416">1416.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 16, fo. 263.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1417" name="note_1417" href="#noteref_1417">1417.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory 13, pt. i, fo. 191. A full account of the pageants, etc.,
+will be found in John Elder's letter.—Chron. of Q. Jane and Q. Mary,
+Appendix <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-variant: small-caps">X</span></span>.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1418" name="note_1418" href="#noteref_1418">1418.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Chron. of Q. Jane and Q. Mary, pp. 78-79.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1419" name="note_1419" href="#noteref_1419">1419.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Martin Bowes, of the old members, alone continued to sit for the
+city, the places of the other members being taken by Ralph Cholmeley,
+who had succeeded Broke as Recorder; Richard Grafton, the printer;
+and Richard Burnell.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1420" name="note_1420" href="#noteref_1420">1420.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Chron. of Q. Jane and Q. Mary, 82; Wriothesley, 122.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1421" name="note_1421" href="#noteref_1421">1421.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory 13, part i, fo. 111b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1422" name="note_1422" href="#noteref_1422">1422.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, fo. 193.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1423" name="note_1423" href="#noteref_1423">1423.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 16, fo. 300. Bishop Braybroke, nearly two centuries
+before, had done all he could to put down marketing within the sacred
+precincts, and to render "Paul's Walk"—as the great nave of the
+cathedral was called—less a scene of barter and frivolity.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1424" name="note_1424" href="#noteref_1424">1424.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory 13, pt. i, fo. 251b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1425" name="note_1425" href="#noteref_1425">1425.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">In 1558, a man convicted of breaking this law was ordered to
+ride through the public market places of the city, his face towards the
+horse's tail, with a piece of beef hanging before and behind him, and a
+paper on his head setting forth his offence.—Repertory 13, fo. 12b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1426" name="note_1426" href="#noteref_1426">1426.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory 13, pt. i, fo. 193; Letter Book S, fo. 119b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1427" name="note_1427" href="#noteref_1427">1427.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 16, fo. 285b; Letter Book R, fo. 290b; Repertory 13,
+pt. i, fo. 147; Wriothesley, ii, 114.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1428" name="note_1428" href="#noteref_1428">1428.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Grey Friars Chron., p. 89.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1429" name="note_1429" href="#noteref_1429">1429.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, p. 95.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1430" name="note_1430" href="#noteref_1430">1430.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">ibid.</span></span></p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1431" name="note_1431" href="#noteref_1431">1431.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, p. 78n.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1432" name="note_1432" href="#noteref_1432">1432.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 16, fo. 321b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1433" name="note_1433" href="#noteref_1433">1433.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Wriothesley, ii, 126; Grey Friars Chron., p. 94.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1434" name="note_1434" href="#noteref_1434">1434.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Wriothesley, ii, 126n; Grey Friars Chron., pp. 56, 57, 95.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1435" name="note_1435" href="#noteref_1435">1435.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Foxe's "Acts and Monuments," vi, 717, 737, 740, vii, 114, 115.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1436" name="note_1436" href="#noteref_1436">1436.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">"Item the v<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="vertical-align: super">th</span></span> day of September [1556], was browte thorrow
+Cheppesyde teyd in ropes xxiij<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="vertical-align: super">t</span></span>i tayd together as herreytkes, and soo
+unto the Lowlers tower."—Grey Friars Chron., p. 98.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1437" name="note_1437" href="#noteref_1437">1437.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">"At this time [Aug., 1554] there was so many Spanyerdes in
+London that a man shoulde have mett in the stretes for one Inglisheman
+above iiij Spanyerdes, to the great discomfort of the Inglishe nation.
+The halles taken up for Spanyerdes."—Chron. Q. Jane and Q. Mary, p. 81.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1438" name="note_1438" href="#noteref_1438">1438.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">ibid</span></span>.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1439" name="note_1439" href="#noteref_1439">1439.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory 13, pt. i, fo. 205b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1440" name="note_1440" href="#noteref_1440">1440.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">By an order in council, dated Greenwich, 13 March, 1555, the
+merchants of the Steelyard were thenceforth to be allowed to buy cloth
+in warehouses adjoining the Steelyard, without hindrance from the
+mayor. The mayor was ordered to give up cloth that had been seized
+as foreign bought and sold at Blackwell Hall. He was, moreover, not
+to demand <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">quotam salis</span></span> of the merchants, who were to be allowed to
+import into the city fish, corn and other provisions free of import.—Repertory
+13, pt. ii, fo. 384b; Letter Book S, fo. 76.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1441" name="note_1441" href="#noteref_1441">1441.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory 13, pt. ii, fos. 399b, 404, 406; Letter Book S, fos. 70, 93b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1442" name="note_1442" href="#noteref_1442">1442.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory 13, pt. ii, fo. 508b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1443" name="note_1443" href="#noteref_1443">1443.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Wheeler's "Treatise of Commerce" (ed. 1601), p. 100.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1444" name="note_1444" href="#noteref_1444">1444.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory 13, pt. ii, fos. 507b, 520b, 540.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1445" name="note_1445" href="#noteref_1445">1445.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory 13, pt. ii, fo. 529.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1446" name="note_1446" href="#noteref_1446">1446.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, fo. 526b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1447" name="note_1447" href="#noteref_1447">1447.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, fo. 534b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1448" name="note_1448" href="#noteref_1448">1448.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory 13, pt. ii, fo. 420.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1449" name="note_1449" href="#noteref_1449">1449.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Stafford had issued a proclamation from Scarborough Castle declaiming
+against Philip for introducing 12,000 foreigners into the country,
+and announcing himself as protector and governor of the realm. He
+was captured by the Earl of Westmoreland and executed on Tower
+Hill 28 May.—Journal 17, fo. 34b; Letter Book S, fo. 127b; Holinshed.
+iv, 87; Machyn's Diary, p. 137.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1450" name="note_1450" href="#noteref_1450">1450.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 17, fo. 37b; Letter Book S, fo. 131.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1451" name="note_1451" href="#noteref_1451">1451.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 17, fos. 37b, 38; Letter Book S, fo. 131b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1452" name="note_1452" href="#noteref_1452">1452.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Machyn, p. 142.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1453" name="note_1453" href="#noteref_1453">1453.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory 13, pt. ii, fo. 517.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1454" name="note_1454" href="#noteref_1454">1454.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">"London fond v.c. men all in bluw cassokes, sum by shyppes
+and sum to Dover by land, the goodlyst men that ever whent, and best
+be-sene in change (of) apprelle."—Diary, p. 143.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1455" name="note_1455" href="#noteref_1455">1455.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Merchant Taylor, son of William Offley, of Chester; alderman of
+Portsoken and Aldgate Wards. Was one of the signatories to the
+document nominating Lady Jane Grey successor to Edward VI, and
+was within a few weeks (1 Aug.) elected sheriff. Knighted with alderman
+William Chester, 7 Feb., 1557. His mansion-house was in Lime
+Street, near the Church of St. Andrew Undershaft. <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Ob.</span></span> 29 Aug, 1582.—Machyn,
+pp. 125, 353; Index to Remembrancia, p. 37, note. Fuller,
+who erroneously places his death in 1580, describes him as the "Zaccheus
+of London" not "on account of his low stature, but his great charity
+in bestowing half of his estate on the poor."—Fuller's "Worthies,"
+p. 191.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1456" name="note_1456" href="#noteref_1456">1456.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory 13, pt. ii, fos. 521b, 522; Letter Book S, fo. 134.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1457" name="note_1457" href="#noteref_1457">1457.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 17, fo. 54b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1458" name="note_1458" href="#noteref_1458">1458.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory 13, pt. ii, fo. 530.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1459" name="note_1459" href="#noteref_1459">1459.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory 13, pt. ii, fos. 530, 532, 522b, 535; Journal 17, fo. 54.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1460" name="note_1460" href="#noteref_1460">1460.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Machyn, p. 147.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1461" name="note_1461" href="#noteref_1461">1461.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory 13, pt. ii, fo. 571.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1462" name="note_1462" href="#noteref_1462">1462.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 17, fo. 55. See Appendix. They were ordered in the
+first instance to be forwarded to Dover by the 19th Jan. at the latest, but
+on the 6th Jan. the Privy Council sent a letter to the mayor to the effect
+that "albeit he was willed to send the v<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="vertical-align: super">c</span></span> men levied in London to
+Dover, forasmuch as it is sithence considered here that they may with
+best speede be brought to the place of service by seas, he is willen to
+sende them with all speede by hoyes to Queenburgh, where order is
+given for the receavinge and placing of them in the shippes, to be
+transported with all speede possible."—Harl. MS. 643, fo. 198; Notes
+to Machyn's Diary, p. 362.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1463" name="note_1463" href="#noteref_1463">1463.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 17, fo. 56.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1464" name="note_1464" href="#noteref_1464">1464.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Wriothesley, ii, 140.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1465" name="note_1465" href="#noteref_1465">1465.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Order of the Court of Aldermen, 10 Jan.—Repertory 13, pt. ii,
+fo. 582.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1466" name="note_1466" href="#noteref_1466">1466.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory 13, pt. ii, fo. 582b; Precept to the Companies.—Journal
+17, fo. 56b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1467" name="note_1467" href="#noteref_1467">1467.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 17, fo. 57. So furious was this storm, lasting four or five
+days, that "some said that the same came to passe through necromancie,
+and that the diuell was raised vp and become French, the truth
+whereof is known (saith Master Grafton) to God."—Holinshed, iv, 93.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1468" name="note_1468" href="#noteref_1468">1468.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 17, fo. 7.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1469" name="note_1469" href="#noteref_1469">1469.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory 14, fo. 1b; Journal 17, fo. 58; Machyn, 164.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1470" name="note_1470" href="#noteref_1470">1470.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 17, fos. 59, 59b; Letter Book S, fos. 154b, 155.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1471" name="note_1471" href="#noteref_1471">1471.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Cal. State Papers Dom. (1547-1580), p. 100; Wriothesley, ii,
+140, 141.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1472" name="note_1472" href="#noteref_1472">1472.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Stat. 5 and 6, Edward VI, c. 20, which repealed Stat. <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">37</span></span>, Henry
+VIII, c. 9 (allowing interest to be taken on loans at the rate of ten per
+cent.) and forbade all usury. This Statute was afterwards repealed
+(Stat. 13, Eliz., c. 8) and the Statute of Henry VIII re-enacted. The
+dispensation granted by Mary was confirmed in 1560 by Elizabeth.—Repertory
+14, fo. 404b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1473" name="note_1473" href="#noteref_1473">1473.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory 14, fo. 15b; Journal 17, fo. 63. A large portion of
+this loan was repaid by Elizabeth soon after her accession.—Repertory 14,
+fos. 236b, 289.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1474" name="note_1474" href="#noteref_1474">1474.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory 14, fos. 94b, 96b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1475" name="note_1475" href="#noteref_1475">1475.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The commemoration was eventually put down by the Stuarts as
+giving rise to tumults and disorders.—Journal 49, fo. 270b; Luttrell's
+Diary, 17 Nov., 1682.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1476" name="note_1476" href="#noteref_1476">1476.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Son of Roger Leigh, of Wellington, co. Salop, an apprentice of
+Sir Rowland Hill, whose niece, Alice Barker, he married. Buried in
+the Mercers' Chapel. By his second son, William, he was ancestor of
+the Lords Leigh, of Stoneleigh, and by his third son William, grandfather
+of Francis Leigh, Earl of Chichester.—Notes to Machyn's
+Diary, p. 407.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1477" name="note_1477" href="#noteref_1477">1477.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">"The order of the sheryfes at the receyvyng of the quenes
+highenes in to Myddlesex."—Letter Book S, fo. 183; Repertory 14,
+fo. 90b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1478" name="note_1478" href="#noteref_1478">1478.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book S, fo. 182b; Journal 7, fo. 101b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1479" name="note_1479" href="#noteref_1479">1479.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory 14, fos. 97, 98.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1480" name="note_1480" href="#noteref_1480">1480.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, fo. 99.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1481" name="note_1481" href="#noteref_1481">1481.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, fo. 102b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1482" name="note_1482" href="#noteref_1482">1482.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory 14, fo. 103b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1483" name="note_1483" href="#noteref_1483">1483.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Dated 27 Dec., 1558.—Journal 17, fo. 106b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1484" name="note_1484" href="#noteref_1484">1484.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Wriothesley, ii, 145.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1485" name="note_1485" href="#noteref_1485">1485.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span> <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">ibid</span></span>.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1486" name="note_1486" href="#noteref_1486">1486.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory 4, fo. 213b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1487" name="note_1487" href="#noteref_1487">1487.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 17, fos. 120b, 168; Repertory 14, fo. 152; Letter Book T,
+fo. 82b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1488" name="note_1488" href="#noteref_1488">1488.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">"In some places the coapes, vestments, and aulter clothes, bookes,
+banners, sepulchers and other ornaments of the churches were burned,
+which cost above £2,000 renuinge agayne in Queen Maries time"
+(Wriothesley, ii, 146; <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Cf.</span></span> Machyn, p. 298). Among the churchwarden
+accounts of the parish of St. Mary-at-Hill for the year 1558-1559 there
+is a payment of one shilling for "bringing down ymages to Romeland
+(near Billingsgate) to be burnt."</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1489" name="note_1489" href="#noteref_1489">1489.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Proclamation, dated 19 Sept., 1559.—Journal 17, fo. 267; Letter
+Book T, fo. 5b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1490" name="note_1490" href="#noteref_1490">1490.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 17, fo. 184b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1491" name="note_1491" href="#noteref_1491">1491.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Proclamation, dated 24 March, 1560.—Journal 17, fo. 223b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1492" name="note_1492" href="#noteref_1492">1492.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">In April the city was called upon to furnish 900 soldiers, in May
+250 seamen, and in June 200 soldiers.—Repertory 14, fos. 323, 336,
+339b, 340, 340b, 344b; Journal 17, fos. 238b, 244. It is noteworthy
+that the number of able men in the city at this time serviceable for war,
+although untrained, was estimated to amount to no more than 5,000.—Journal
+17, fo. 244b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1493" name="note_1493" href="#noteref_1493">1493.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 18, fos. 57-60b. The livery companies furnished the men
+according to allotment. The barber-surgeons claimed exemption by
+statute (32 Henry VIII, c. 42), but subsequently consented to waive
+their claim. The city also objected to supplying the soldiers with
+cloaks.—Repertory 15, fos. 110b, 113.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1494" name="note_1494" href="#noteref_1494">1494.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 18, fo. 66; Machyn, pp. 292, 293.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1495" name="note_1495" href="#noteref_1495">1495.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 18, fo. 71.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1496" name="note_1496" href="#noteref_1496">1496.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The queen to the mayor and corporation of London, 30 June, 1563.—Journal
+18, fo. 124.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1497" name="note_1497" href="#noteref_1497">1497.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory 15, fo. 258.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1498" name="note_1498" href="#noteref_1498">1498.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, fo. 259.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1499" name="note_1499" href="#noteref_1499">1499.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, fo. 263.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1500" name="note_1500" href="#noteref_1500">1500.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The queen to the mayor, 2 Aug., 1563.—Journal 18, fo. 140.
+Precept of the mayor.—<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, fo. 136; Repertory 15, fo. 279b; Machyn's
+Diary, p. 312.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1501" name="note_1501" href="#noteref_1501">1501.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 18, fo. 128.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1502" name="note_1502" href="#noteref_1502">1502.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, fo. 119b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1503" name="note_1503" href="#noteref_1503">1503.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory 15, fo. 265b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1504" name="note_1504" href="#noteref_1504">1504.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Machyn, 312.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1505" name="note_1505" href="#noteref_1505">1505.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 18, fos. 139, 139b, 142, 151b, 152b, 154, 156b, 184, 189b.
+With the sickness was associated, as was so often the case, a scarcity of
+food.—Repertory 15, fos. 127, 133b, 138, 168, 178, 179b, etc. The
+rate of mortality increased to such an extent that a committee was
+appointed for the purpose of procuring more burial accommodation.—Repertory
+15, fos. 311b, 313b, 333.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1506" name="note_1506" href="#noteref_1506">1506.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Proclamation dated 1 Aug., 1563.—Journal 18, fo. 141.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1507" name="note_1507" href="#noteref_1507">1507.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory 15, fo. 284b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1508" name="note_1508" href="#noteref_1508">1508.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 18, fo. 249.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1509" name="note_1509" href="#noteref_1509">1509.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, fo. 190b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1510" name="note_1510" href="#noteref_1510">1510.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 18, fos. 214, 215, 227, 291b, 354b; Holinshed, iv, 224.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1511" name="note_1511" href="#noteref_1511">1511.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 17, fos. 320, 321, 331b; Letter Book T, fos. 42, 42b;
+Repertory 14, fo. 491b. The fire caused by the lightning threatened
+the neighbouring shops, and their contents were therefore removed to
+Christchurch, Newgate and elsewhere for safety.—Journal 17, fo. 319b;
+Letter Book T, fo. 42.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1512" name="note_1512" href="#noteref_1512">1512.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory 15, fos. 474, 478.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1513" name="note_1513" href="#noteref_1513">1513.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory 16, fos. 227, 241b, 274; Letter Book V, fo. 108b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1514" name="note_1514" href="#noteref_1514">1514.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory 16, fos. 303b, 448. Among the Chamber Accounts of
+this period we find an item of a sum exceeding £4 paid for "Cusshens
+to be occupied at Powles by my L. Maio<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="vertical-align: super">r</span></span> and thaldermen, vz:—for
+cloth for the uttorside lyning of leather feathers and for making of
+theym as by a bill appearth."—Chamber Accounts, Town Clerk's Office,
+vol. i, fo. 50b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1515" name="note_1515" href="#noteref_1515">1515.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 13, fos. 417, 420, 435, 442b, 443.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1516" name="note_1516" href="#noteref_1516">1516.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Cotton MS., Otho E, x. fo. 45; <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Cf.</span></span> Burgon's "Life of Gresham,"
+i, 31-33.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1517" name="note_1517" href="#noteref_1517">1517.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 14, fos. 124, 124b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1518" name="note_1518" href="#noteref_1518">1518.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">By Sir Richard's first wife Audrey, daughter of William Lynne, of
+Southwick, co. Northampton. Sir Thomas is supposed to have been
+born in London in 1519. Having been bound apprentice to his uncle,
+Sir John Gresham, he was admitted to the freedom of the Mercers'
+Company in 1543. Married Anne, daughter of William Ferneley, of
+West Creting, co. Suffolk, widow of William Read, mercer.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1519" name="note_1519" href="#noteref_1519">1519.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The queen's business kept him so much abroad that her majesty
+wrote to the Common Council (7 March, 1563) desiring that he might
+be discharged from all municipal duties.—Journal 18, fo. 137.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1520" name="note_1520" href="#noteref_1520">1520.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Printed in Burgon's "Life of Gresham," i, 409.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1521" name="note_1521" href="#noteref_1521">1521.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory 15, fo. 237b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1522" name="note_1522" href="#noteref_1522">1522.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Burgon, ii, 30-40.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1523" name="note_1523" href="#noteref_1523">1523.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory 15, fos. 406b, 407.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1524" name="note_1524" href="#noteref_1524">1524.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory 15, fos. 410b, 412.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1525" name="note_1525" href="#noteref_1525">1525.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, fos. 417b, 431.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1526" name="note_1526" href="#noteref_1526">1526.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory 16, fos. 31b, 32b, 43b; Letter Book V, fos. 5, 7b, 8,
+17, 21b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1527" name="note_1527" href="#noteref_1527">1527.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The amount of subscriptions and charges is set out in a "booke"
+and entered on the City's Journal (No. 19, fos. 12-20; <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Cf.</span></span> Letter Book
+V, fos. 70b-79); see also Repertory 16, fo. 126.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1528" name="note_1528" href="#noteref_1528">1528.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 18. fo. 398.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1529" name="note_1529" href="#noteref_1529">1529.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory 16, fo. 316.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1530" name="note_1530" href="#noteref_1530">1530.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory 16, fo. 406b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1531" name="note_1531" href="#noteref_1531">1531.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory 15, fo. 268b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1532" name="note_1532" href="#noteref_1532">1532.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory 16, fo. 229.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1533" name="note_1533" href="#noteref_1533">1533.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">"A proclamacioun concernyng the cutting of the crest conyzans and
+mantell of the arms of S<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="vertical-align: super">r</span></span> Thomas Gresham."—Journal 19, fo. 150b;
+Letter Book V, fo. 222.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1534" name="note_1534" href="#noteref_1534">1534.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 20, pt. ii, fo. 341.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1535" name="note_1535" href="#noteref_1535">1535.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory 18, fo. 362.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1536" name="note_1536" href="#noteref_1536">1536.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">"Law and Practice of Marine Insurance," by John Duer, LL.D.
+(New York, 1845), Lecture ii, p. 33.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1537" name="note_1537" href="#noteref_1537">1537.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">At the present day the form of policy used at Lloyds and commonly
+called the "Lloyd's policy" contains the following clause:—"and
+it is agreed by us the insurers, that this writing or policy of
+assurance shall be of as much force and effect as the surest writing or
+policy of assurance heretofore made in Lombard Street or in the Royal
+Exchange or elsewhere in London."—Arnould, "Marine Insurance"
+(6th ed.), i, 230.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1538" name="note_1538" href="#noteref_1538">1538.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory 18, fo. 362b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1539" name="note_1539" href="#noteref_1539">1539.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Cal. State Papers Dom. (1547-1580), p. 523.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1540" name="note_1540" href="#noteref_1540">1540.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory 19, fos. 166b, 168.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1541" name="note_1541" href="#noteref_1541">1541.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The reader is here reminded that there is an essential difference
+between life policies and fire or marine policies of assurance. The latter,
+being policies of indemnity, recovery can be had at law only to the
+extent of the actual damage done, whereas in life policies the whole
+amount of the policy can be recovered.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1542" name="note_1542" href="#noteref_1542">1542.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory 17, fo. 300.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1543" name="note_1543" href="#noteref_1543">1543.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory 19, fo. 150.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1544" name="note_1544" href="#noteref_1544">1544.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Cal. Wills, Court of Hust., London, ii, 698.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1545" name="note_1545" href="#noteref_1545">1545.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Printed Report "Gresham College Trust," 29 Oct., 1885.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1546" name="note_1546" href="#noteref_1546">1546.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">A return made in 1567 by the livery companies of foreigners
+residing in the city and liberties gives the number as 3,562.—Repertory
+16, fo. 202. Another authority gives the number as 4,851, of which
+3,838 were Dutch.—Burgon's "Life of Gresham," ii, 242, citing Haynes,
+p. 461.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1547" name="note_1547" href="#noteref_1547">1547.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Burgon's "Life of Gresham," ii, 271-275.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1548" name="note_1548" href="#noteref_1548">1548.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory 16, fo. 164.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1549" name="note_1549" href="#noteref_1549">1549.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 19, fo. 116.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1550" name="note_1550" href="#noteref_1550">1550.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Precept of the mayor to that effect, 19 Oct., 1568.-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, fo. 132b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1551" name="note_1551" href="#noteref_1551">1551.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory 16, fo. 451.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1552" name="note_1552" href="#noteref_1552">1552.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 19, fo. 180; Letter Book V, fo. 245.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1553" name="note_1553" href="#noteref_1553">1553.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book V, fo. 246. Holinshed (iv, 234) and others give the
+whole credit of providing the cemetery to the liberality of Sir Thomas
+Rowe, the mayor.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1554" name="note_1554" href="#noteref_1554">1554.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Proclamation (15 July, 1568) against suspected persons landing in
+England or returning "with any furniture for mayntenaunce of ther
+rebellion or other lyke cryme" against the King of Spain.—Journal 18,
+fo. 115; <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Cf.</span></span> Letter Book V, fos. 181, 246b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1555" name="note_1555" href="#noteref_1555">1555.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Green, "Hist. of the English People," ii, 418.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1556" name="note_1556" href="#noteref_1556">1556.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory 15, fos. 162, 164, 166b, 241b, 258, 267b, 297, etc.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1557" name="note_1557" href="#noteref_1557">1557.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Strype, Stow's "Survey" (ed. 1720), bk. i, p. 283.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1558" name="note_1558" href="#noteref_1558">1558.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal II, fo. 253.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1559" name="note_1559" href="#noteref_1559">1559.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 19, fos. 55-58; Letter Book V, fos. 115b-117b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1560" name="note_1560" href="#noteref_1560">1560.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Price's "London Bankers" (enlarged edition), p. 51.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1561" name="note_1561" href="#noteref_1561">1561.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book V, fo. 139.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1562" name="note_1562" href="#noteref_1562">1562.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Cal. State Papers Dom. (1547-1580), p. 314.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1563" name="note_1563" href="#noteref_1563">1563.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Clode, "Early Hist. of the Guild of Merchant Taylors," pt. ii,
+pp. 229-230.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1564" name="note_1564" href="#noteref_1564">1564.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 19, fo. 133b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1565" name="note_1565" href="#noteref_1565">1565.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Holinshed, iv, 234.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1566" name="note_1566" href="#noteref_1566">1566.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">"Mesmes j'entendz que de la blanque, qu'on a tirée ces jours
+passés en ceste ville, ceste Royne retirera pour elle plus de cent mille
+livres esterlin, qui sont 33,000 escuz; de quoy le monde murumre assés
+pour la diminution qu'ilz trouvent aulx bénéfices qu'ilz esperoient de
+leurs billetz"—wrote De la Motlie Fénélon, the French ambassador in
+London.—Cooper's "Recueil des Dépéches, etc., des Ambassadeurs de
+France (Paris and London, 1838-1840)," i, 155.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1567" name="note_1567" href="#noteref_1567">1567.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Proclamation, 6 Jan., 1569.—Journal 19, fo. 139; Letter Book V,
+fo. 210.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1568" name="note_1568" href="#noteref_1568">1568.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">See letter from Sir Arthur Champernowne, William Hawkins and
+others to the lords of the council. 1 Jan., 1569.—Cal. State Papers
+Dom. (1547-1580), p. 326.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1569" name="note_1569" href="#noteref_1569">1569.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Cal. State Papers Dom. (1547-1580), p. 326.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1570" name="note_1570" href="#noteref_1570">1570.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Cotton MS., Galba C, iii, fo. 151b. This letter was signed by
+John Gresham, Thomas Offley, John White, Roger Martyn, Leonell
+Duckett, Thomas Heaton, Richard Wheler, Thomas Aldersey and
+Francis Beinson.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1571" name="note_1571" href="#noteref_1571">1571.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Citizen and Merchant Taylor: Alderman of the Wards of Portsoken
+and Bishopsgate; Sheriff, 1560-61. <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Ob.</span></span> 2 Sept., 1570. Buried
+in Hackney Church. He bestowed the sum of £100 for the relief
+of members of his company "usinge the brode shire or ell rowinge of
+the pearch or making of garmentes" during his lifetime, and some
+landed estate in the city by his will for like purpose.—Letter Book V,
+fo. 274b; Cal. of Wills, Court of Husting, ii, 686.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1572" name="note_1572" href="#noteref_1572">1572.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter printed (from original among State Papers Dom.) in
+Burgon's "Life of Gresham," ii, 287.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1573" name="note_1573" href="#noteref_1573">1573.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Sir Thomas Rowe, mayor, to Secretary Cecil. 23 Jan., 1569.—Cal.
+State Papers Dom. (1547-1580), p. 329; Burgon's "Life of
+Gresham," ii, 295-296.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1574" name="note_1574" href="#noteref_1574">1574.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, 25 Jan.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1575" name="note_1575" href="#noteref_1575">1575.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Cooper's "Dépêches, etc., des Ambassadeurs de France,"
+i, 176-177.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1576" name="note_1576" href="#noteref_1576">1576.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Burgon's "Life of Gresham," ii, 297.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1577" name="note_1577" href="#noteref_1577">1577.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Lansd. MS., No. xii, fo. 16b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1578" name="note_1578" href="#noteref_1578">1578.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, fo. 22.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1579" name="note_1579" href="#noteref_1579">1579.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory 17, fo. 36b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1580" name="note_1580" href="#noteref_1580">1580.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 19, fo. 247b; Letter Book V, fo. 301.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1581" name="note_1581" href="#noteref_1581">1581.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 19, fo. 257.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1582" name="note_1582" href="#noteref_1582">1582.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, fo. 390b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1583" name="note_1583" href="#noteref_1583">1583.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 19, fo. 390b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1584" name="note_1584" href="#noteref_1584">1584.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Add. MS., No. 5, 755, fo. 58.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1585" name="note_1585" href="#noteref_1585">1585.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">In the following year he was removed to the Charterhouse, but
+being discovered in correspondence with the deposed Queen of Scots was
+again placed in the Tower. He was tried and convicted of treason, and
+after some delay executed on Tower Hill.—Holinshed, iv, 254, 262, 264,
+267.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1586" name="note_1586" href="#noteref_1586">1586.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The proclamation, which is set out in Journal 19, fo. 202b (<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Cf.</span></span>
+Letter Book V, fo. 267b), gives in detail the rise and progress of the
+rebellion.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1587" name="note_1587" href="#noteref_1587">1587.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 19, fo. 202; Letter Book V, fo. 267.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1588" name="note_1588" href="#noteref_1588">1588.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 19, fo. 202; Letter Book V, fo. 267.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1589" name="note_1589" href="#noteref_1589">1589.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter Book V, fo. 269.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1590" name="note_1590" href="#noteref_1590">1590.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 19, fo. 206b; Letter Book V, fo. 270b; Repertory 16,
+fo. 522b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1591" name="note_1591" href="#noteref_1591">1591.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Holinshed, iv, 254.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1592" name="note_1592" href="#noteref_1592">1592.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, 262.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1593" name="note_1593" href="#noteref_1593">1593.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">From Hertfordshire, alderman of Billingsgate Ward.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1594" name="note_1594" href="#noteref_1594">1594.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Dated 8 Nov.—Journal 19, fo. 370b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1595" name="note_1595" href="#noteref_1595">1595.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Holinshed, iv, 263.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1596" name="note_1596" href="#noteref_1596">1596.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory 17, fos. 8b, 23, 27b, 29. 243, etc.; Repertory 19, fos.
+24b, 154, etc.; City Records known as "Remembrancia" (Analytical
+Index), pp. 51-55.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1597" name="note_1597" href="#noteref_1597">1597.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Stranger denizens, carrying on a handicraft in the city, had
+recently preferred a Bill in Parliament against several of the livery
+companies. They were persuaded, however, to drop it, and refer their
+grievance to the Court of Aldermen.—Repertory 17, fos. 302b, 335,
+337. A return made by the mayor (10 Nov., 1571) of the strangers
+then living in London and Southwark and liberties thereof gives the
+total number as 4,631.—Cal. State Papers Dom. (1547-1580), p. 427.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1598" name="note_1598" href="#noteref_1598">1598.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory 17, fo. 372.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1599" name="note_1599" href="#noteref_1599">1599.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 19, fos. 407-408b, 417-417b; Repertory 17, fos. 292,
+298b, 307, 308.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1600" name="note_1600" href="#noteref_1600">1600.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 20, pt. i, fos. 133b, 143b; Repertory 18, fo. 224b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1601" name="note_1601" href="#noteref_1601">1601.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 20, pt. i, fo. 156b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1602" name="note_1602" href="#noteref_1602">1602.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 20, pt. i, fo. 252; <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, pt. ii, fo. 280b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1603" name="note_1603" href="#noteref_1603">1603.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 20, pt. i, fos. 228b, 239.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1604" name="note_1604" href="#noteref_1604">1604.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory 19, fo. 98.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1605" name="note_1605" href="#noteref_1605">1605.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 20, pt. ii, fo. 371.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1606" name="note_1606" href="#noteref_1606">1606.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">He was removed by order of Common Council, 13 Dec., <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">pre
+diversis magnis rebus dictam civitatem et negotia ejusdem tangentibus</span></span>.—Journal
+20, pt. ii, fo. 376b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1607" name="note_1607" href="#noteref_1607">1607.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 20, pt. ii, fos. 388b, 389, 394-395b. The queen to the
+mayor, etc., of London, 12 March.—Cal. State Papers Dom. (1547-1580),
+p. 586.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1608" name="note_1608" href="#noteref_1608">1608.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 20, pt. ii, fo. 409b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1609" name="note_1609" href="#noteref_1609">1609.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, fos. 404, 408b, 412.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1610" name="note_1610" href="#noteref_1610">1610.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory 19, fo. 346b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1611" name="note_1611" href="#noteref_1611">1611.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">This conjecture is made from the fact of a precept having been
+issued on the 20th Jan. for certain persons to furnish themselves with
+velvet coats, chains and horses, and a suitable suite, to wait upon the
+lord mayor on the following Saturday.—Journal 20, pt. ii, fo. 404b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1612" name="note_1612" href="#noteref_1612">1612.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Burgon's "Life of Gresham," ii, 451-452.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1613" name="note_1613" href="#noteref_1613">1613.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 20, pt. ii, fos. 464, 480.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1614" name="note_1614" href="#noteref_1614">1614.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Continuation of Holinshed, iv, 315.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1615" name="note_1615" href="#noteref_1615">1615.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">City Records known as "Remembrancia" (Printed Analytical
+Index), pp. 306, 330, 331, 350-352; Journal 20, pt. ii, fos. 373, 379, 407.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1616" name="note_1616" href="#noteref_1616">1616.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Remembrancia (Index), pp. 207, 331, 334; Journal 21, fo. 235b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1617" name="note_1617" href="#noteref_1617">1617.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Remembrancia, vol. i, No. 331.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1618" name="note_1618" href="#noteref_1618">1618.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">A reference to this defeat is to be found in the Dublin Assembly
+Roll under the year 1581.—"Cal. of Ancient Records of Dublin" (ed.
+by John T. Gilbert, 1891), ii, 155.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1619" name="note_1619" href="#noteref_1619">1619.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Bright, "Hist. of England," ii, 539.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1620" name="note_1620" href="#noteref_1620">1620.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 21, fos. 19, 34, 52, 53, 69b-71b, 78b, etc.; Repertory 20,
+fos. 90, 117, 117b, 119b, etc.; Remembrancia (Analytical Index),
+pp. 230-236.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1621" name="note_1621" href="#noteref_1621">1621.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 21, fo. 329b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1622" name="note_1622" href="#noteref_1622">1622.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Among Chamber Accounts <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">circa</span></span> 1585 we find the following:—"Pd.
+the x of Dec. by order of Courte to Roger Warffeld Treasuro<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="vertical-align: super">r</span></span> of
+Bridewell towards the conveyinge of all the Irishe begging people in
+and nere London to the Citie of Bristowe v<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="vertical-align: super">1.</span></span>"—Chamber Accounts,
+Town Clerk's Office, vol. ii, fo. 17.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1623" name="note_1623" href="#noteref_1623">1623.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory 16, fo. 350.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1624" name="note_1624" href="#noteref_1624">1624.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory 18, fo. 167.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1625" name="note_1625" href="#noteref_1625">1625.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 20, fo. 219b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1626" name="note_1626" href="#noteref_1626">1626.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 21, fo. 81b; Repertory 20, fo. 1b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1627" name="note_1627" href="#noteref_1627">1627.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 21, fo. 90.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1628" name="note_1628" href="#noteref_1628">1628.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, fos. 114b, 135, 290, 322.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1629" name="note_1629" href="#noteref_1629">1629.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Remembrancia (Analytical Index), pp. 364, 365.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1630" name="note_1630" href="#noteref_1630">1630.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">As early as 1554 students had been supported by the Corporation
+and the Companies at the Universities.—Repertory 13, fos. 144b, 148,
+150b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1631" name="note_1631" href="#noteref_1631">1631.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Rembrancia, i, 250, 256 (Analytical Index, pp. 365, 366). Another
+difference shortly occurred between the corporation and the Bishop of
+London in October of this year. A dispute arose between them as to who
+was responsible for keeping St. Paul's Cathedral in repair, each party
+endeavouring to throw the burden upon the other (<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, Analytical Index,
+pp. 323-327); and in the following March (1582) Bishop Aylmer found
+cause to complain by letter of unbecoming treatment by the mayor, both
+of the bishop and his clergy, and threatened, unless matters changed for
+the better, to admonish the mayor publicly at Paul's Cross, "where the
+lord mayor must sit, not as a judge to control, but as a scholar to learn,
+and the writer, not as John Aylmer to be thwarted, but as John London,
+to teach him and all London."—(<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">ibid.</span></span>, pp. 128-129).</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1632" name="note_1632" href="#noteref_1632">1632.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory 20, fo. 282.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1633" name="note_1633" href="#noteref_1633">1633.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Son of Richard Osborne, of Ashford, co. Kent. The story goes that
+he was apprenticed to Sir William Hewet, clothworker, and that he
+married his master's daughter, whom he had rescued from a watery grave
+in the Thames at London Bridge. His son, Sir Edward Osborne, was
+created a baronet by Charles I, and his grandson, Sir Thomas, made
+Duke of Leeds in 1692 by King William III.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1634" name="note_1634" href="#noteref_1634">1634.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Cal. State Papers Dom. (1581-1590), p. 157. The right of holding
+musters in Southwark was again questioned; and the claim of the city
+was upheld by Sir Francis Walsingham. For this he received the thanks
+of the lord mayor by letter dated 15 Feb.—<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, p. 159.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1635" name="note_1635" href="#noteref_1635">1635.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">"A lettre from the quenes ma<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="vertical-align: super">t</span></span>y for y<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="vertical-align: super">e</span></span> mustringe of 4000 men,
+and also for the shewes on the evens of St. John Baptist and St. Peter
+thapostles."—Journal 21, fo. 421b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1636" name="note_1636" href="#noteref_1636">1636.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Contin. of Holinshed, v, 599, 600.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1637" name="note_1637" href="#noteref_1637">1637.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 21, fo. 388b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1638" name="note_1638" href="#noteref_1638">1638.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Stow's Annals (ed. 1592), pp. 1198-1201.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1639" name="note_1639" href="#noteref_1639">1639.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Motley, "United Netherlands," i, pp. 318-324.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1640" name="note_1640" href="#noteref_1640">1640.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">For particulars of his life see Remembrancia (Analytical Index),
+p. 284, note.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1641" name="note_1641" href="#noteref_1641">1641.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 21, fo. 448b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1642" name="note_1642" href="#noteref_1642">1642.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">"Thaccompte of the saide chamberlyn for the transportacioun and
+necessary provision of <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-variant: small-caps">MMCCCCXX</span></span> soldiers into the lowe countryes of
+Flaunders."—Chamber Accounts, vol. ii, fos. 56-58b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1643" name="note_1643" href="#noteref_1643">1643.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Motley, "United Netherlands," i, 340.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1644" name="note_1644" href="#noteref_1644">1644.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Chamber Accounts, ii, 134. The earl's honor of Denbigh, North
+Wales, was mortgaged to certain citizens of London, and not being
+redeemed, was afterwards purchased by the queen herself.—Repertory
+22, fo. 287.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1645" name="note_1645" href="#noteref_1645">1645.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory 21, fos. 308-311.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1646" name="note_1646" href="#noteref_1646">1646.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">For many years after the passing of the Act (1 Edw. VI, c. 14)
+confiscating property devoted to "superstitious uses," the corporation
+and the livery companies were the objects of suspicion of holding
+"concealed lands," <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">i.e.</span></span> lands held charged for superstitious uses, which
+they had failed to divulge. The appointment of a royal commission
+to search for such lands was submitted to the law officers of the city
+for consideration, 9 Sept., 1567.—Repertory 16, fo. 276b. Vexatious
+proceedings continued to be taken under the Act until the year 1623,
+when a Statute was passed, entitled "An Act for the General Quiet of the
+Subjects against all Pretences of Concealment whatsoever."—Stat. 21,
+James I, c. ii.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1647" name="note_1647" href="#noteref_1647">1647.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 22, fo. 1.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1648" name="note_1648" href="#noteref_1648">1648.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, fos. 26, 29.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1649" name="note_1649" href="#noteref_1649">1649.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 22, fo. 37b; Repertory 21, fo. 288b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1650" name="note_1650" href="#noteref_1650">1650.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 22, fos. 52-53. Both the queen's letter and Dalton's
+speech are printed in Stow's Continuation of Holinshed, iv, 902-904.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1651" name="note_1651" href="#noteref_1651">1651.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 22, fos. 48, 57b, 58; Repertory 21, fo. 327.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1652" name="note_1652" href="#noteref_1652">1652.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Proclamation, dated Richmond, 4 Dec., 1586.—Journal 22, fo. 67b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1653" name="note_1653" href="#noteref_1653">1653.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Royal Proclamation against engrossers of corn, 2 Jan., 1587.—Journal
+22, fo. 74.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1654" name="note_1654" href="#noteref_1654">1654.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 22, fo. 64.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1655" name="note_1655" href="#noteref_1655">1655.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory 21, fo. 370b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1656" name="note_1656" href="#noteref_1656">1656.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 21, fo. 136b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1657" name="note_1657" href="#noteref_1657">1657.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Motley, "United Netherlands," ii, 281.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1658" name="note_1658" href="#noteref_1658">1658.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 22, fos. 144, 161b, 166-167b, 170b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1659" name="note_1659" href="#noteref_1659">1659.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 22, fo. 190.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1660" name="note_1660" href="#noteref_1660">1660.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Only 1,000 men out of the force raised by the city went to
+Tilbury, and the earl only consented to receive this small contingent
+on condition they brought their own provisions with them, so scantily
+was the camp supplied with victuals through the queen's parsimony.—Remembrancia
+(Analytical Index), p. 244. Letter from Leicester to
+Walsingham, 26 July.—Cal. State Papers Dom. (1581-1590), p. 513.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1661" name="note_1661" href="#noteref_1661">1661.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Leicester to Walsingham, 28 July, 1588.—State Papers Dom.,
+vol. ccxiii, No. 55.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1662" name="note_1662" href="#noteref_1662">1662.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">William of Malmesbury bears similar testimony to the courage of
+Londoners under good leadership: <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Laudandi prorsus viri et quos
+Mars ipse collata non sperneret hasta si ducem habuissent</span></span>.—Gesta
+Regum (Rolls Series, No. 90), i, 208.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1663" name="note_1663" href="#noteref_1663">1663.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory 22, fo. 148b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1664" name="note_1664" href="#noteref_1664">1664.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">A list of "the London shippes" (including pinnaces), dated
+19 July, 1588, is preserved among the State Papers (Domestic) at the
+Public Record Office (vol. ccxii, No. 68), and is set out in the
+Appendix to this work. Two other lists, dated 24 July, giving the
+names of the ships (exclusive of pinnaces) are also preserved (State
+Papers Dom., vol. ccxiii, Nos. 15, 16). Each of these lists give the
+number of vessels supplied by the city against the Armada as sixteen
+ships and four pinnaces, or as twenty ships (inclusive of pinnaces). It
+is not clear what was the authority of Stow (Howes's Chron., p. 743)
+for stating that the city, having been requested to furnish fifteen ships
+of war and 5,000 men, asked for two days to deliberate, and then
+furnished thirty ships and 10,000 men. At the same time there does
+exist a list of "shipps set forth and payde upon y<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="vertical-align: super">e</span></span> charge of y<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="vertical-align: super">e</span></span> city of
+London, anno 1588" (that is to say, the ships furnished by the city
+for that whole year), and that list contains the names of thirty ships,
+with the number of men on board each vessel and the names of the
+commanders.—State Papers Dom., vol. ccxxxii, fos. 16, 16b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1665" name="note_1665" href="#noteref_1665">1665.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 22, fo. 173. The assessment was afterwards (19 April)
+settled at three shillings in the pound.—<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, fo. 175.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1666" name="note_1666" href="#noteref_1666">1666.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 22, fos. 193, 200b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1667" name="note_1667" href="#noteref_1667">1667.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Richard Tomson to Walsingham, 30 July, 1588.—Cal. State
+Papers Dom. (1581-1590), p. 517.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1668" name="note_1668" href="#noteref_1668">1668.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Hawkins to Walsingham, 31 July, 1588.—Cal. State Papers
+Dom. (1581-1590), p. 517.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1669" name="note_1669" href="#noteref_1669">1669.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Howard to the same, 21 July.—<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, p. 507.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1670" name="note_1670" href="#noteref_1670">1670.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Sir William Wynter to Walsingham, 1 Aug., 1588.—Cal. State
+Papers Dom. (1581-1590), p. 521.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1671" name="note_1671" href="#noteref_1671">1671.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 22, fo. 196b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1672" name="note_1672" href="#noteref_1672">1672.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, fo. 196.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1673" name="note_1673" href="#noteref_1673">1673.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Tomson to Walsingham, 30 July, 1588.—State Papers Dom.,
+vol. ccxiii, No. 67.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1674" name="note_1674" href="#noteref_1674">1674.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory 21, fo. 578.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1675" name="note_1675" href="#noteref_1675">1675.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 22, fo. 200b; Cal. State Papers Dom. (1581-1590), p. 510.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1676" name="note_1676" href="#noteref_1676">1676.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 22, fo. 197.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1677" name="note_1677" href="#noteref_1677">1677.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, fo. 199b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1678" name="note_1678" href="#noteref_1678">1678.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 22, fo. 200.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1679" name="note_1679" href="#noteref_1679">1679.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Nichols' "Progresses of Q. Elizabeth," ii, 537.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1680" name="note_1680" href="#noteref_1680">1680.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 22, fos. 233, 235.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1681" name="note_1681" href="#noteref_1681">1681.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Nichols' "Progresses of Q. Elizabeth," ii, 538, 539.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1682" name="note_1682" href="#noteref_1682">1682.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">On the 7th Feb., 1583, previously to setting out on his last ill-fated
+expedition, Gilbert addressed a letter to Walsingham from "his
+house in Redcross Street."—Cal. State Papers Dom. (1581-1590), p. 95.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1683" name="note_1683" href="#noteref_1683">1683.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">See the will of Dame Margaret Hawkins, dated 23 April, 1619.—Cal.
+of Wills, Court of Hust., London, ii, 745. The will contains
+many bequests of articles which savour of Spanish loot.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1684" name="note_1684" href="#noteref_1684">1684.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Strype, Stow's "Survey" (1720), bk. ii, p. 44.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1685" name="note_1685" href="#noteref_1685">1685.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 22, fo. 202b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1686" name="note_1686" href="#noteref_1686">1686.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 22, fo. 210; Repertory 21, fos. 590b, 593; Repertory 22,
+fos. 15, 26b, 27; Cal. State Papers Dom. (1581-1590), p. 471.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1687" name="note_1687" href="#noteref_1687">1687.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 22, fo. 252; Repertory 22, fo. 16b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1688" name="note_1688" href="#noteref_1688">1688.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 22, fos. 227b, 278.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1689" name="note_1689" href="#noteref_1689">1689.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Burghley and others to the mayor, 26 July, 1589.—Journal 22,
+fo. 312.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1690" name="note_1690" href="#noteref_1690">1690.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, fo. 316b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1691" name="note_1691" href="#noteref_1691">1691.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 22, fo. 345b; Journal 23, fo. 79.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1692" name="note_1692" href="#noteref_1692">1692.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 22, fo. 314.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1693" name="note_1693" href="#noteref_1693">1693.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 22, fo. 321b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1694" name="note_1694" href="#noteref_1694">1694.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, fo. 326.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1695" name="note_1695" href="#noteref_1695">1695.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, fo. 321.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1696" name="note_1696" href="#noteref_1696">1696.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 23, fos. 35, 38.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1697" name="note_1697" href="#noteref_1697">1697.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">July 24, 1591.—Remembrancia. i, 599 (Analytical Index, p. 408).</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1698" name="note_1698" href="#noteref_1698">1698.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 23, fos. 31, 43b, 48b; Repertory 22, fo. 284b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1699" name="note_1699" href="#noteref_1699">1699.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 23, fos. 68, 68b; <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Cf.</span></span> Cal. State Papers Dom. (1591-1594),
+p. 48, where the date of the letter is given as "May."</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1700" name="note_1700" href="#noteref_1700">1700.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 23, fos. 325b, 383b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1701" name="note_1701" href="#noteref_1701">1701.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 23, fos. 45-46b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1702" name="note_1702" href="#noteref_1702">1702.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 24, fo. 86.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1703" name="note_1703" href="#noteref_1703">1703.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Proclamation, dated 16 Sept., 1591.—Journal 23, fo. 47.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1704" name="note_1704" href="#noteref_1704">1704.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 23, fo. 73.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1705" name="note_1705" href="#noteref_1705">1705.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, fo. 71.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1706" name="note_1706" href="#noteref_1706">1706.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Proclamations, dated 8 Jan. and 26 Sept., 1592.—Journal 23,
+fos. 78b, 136.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1707" name="note_1707" href="#noteref_1707">1707.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The queen to the lord mayor, 6 Jan., 1592.—Cal. State Papers Dom.
+(1591-1594), p. 168. The same to the same, 25 Jan.—Journal 23, fo. 87.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1708" name="note_1708" href="#noteref_1708">1708.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 23, fos. 157, 167, 174, 224b; Repertory 23, fo. 29.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1709" name="note_1709" href="#noteref_1709">1709.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">It was in 1592 that bills of mortality, kept by the parish clerks,
+were for the first time published.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1710" name="note_1710" href="#noteref_1710">1710.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 23, fo. 204b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1711" name="note_1711" href="#noteref_1711">1711.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 23, fo. 266.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1712" name="note_1712" href="#noteref_1712">1712.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, fos. 400, 402.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1713" name="note_1713" href="#noteref_1713">1713.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, fo. 153.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1714" name="note_1714" href="#noteref_1714">1714.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 23, fo. 290b. The number was afterwards reduced to 350
+men.—<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, fo. 296b; Remembrancia, ii, 3, 27, 30.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1715" name="note_1715" href="#noteref_1715">1715.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 23, fo. 290.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1716" name="note_1716" href="#noteref_1716">1716.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, fo. 289.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1717" name="note_1717" href="#noteref_1717">1717.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 23, fo. 293. The names, tonnage and crews of the ships
+are thus given (Remembrancia, ii, 26):—The Assention, 400 tons, 100
+mariners; The Consent, 350 tons, 100 mariners; The Susan Bonadventure,
+300 tons, 70 mariners; The Cherubim, 300 tons, 70 mariners;
+The Minion, 180 tons, 50 mariners; and The Primrose, 180 tons,
+50 mariners. Only one pinnace is mentioned, of 50 tons, with
+20 mariners.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1718" name="note_1718" href="#noteref_1718">1718.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 23, fo. 323b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1719" name="note_1719" href="#noteref_1719">1719.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Chamberlain's Letters, <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">temp.</span></span>, Eliz. (Camd. Soc., No. 79), p. 50.
+The writer was a son of Richard Chamberlain, a city alderman.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1720" name="note_1720" href="#noteref_1720">1720.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Alderman of Tower Ward; Sheriff 1584-5; Mayor 1597.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1721" name="note_1721" href="#noteref_1721">1721.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory 24, fo. 410b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1722" name="note_1722" href="#noteref_1722">1722.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory 25, fo. 216b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1723" name="note_1723" href="#noteref_1723">1723.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The letter is printed <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">in extenso</span></span> in Chambers' "Book of Days,"
+i, 464, and in Goodman's "Court of James I," ii, 127.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1724" name="note_1724" href="#noteref_1724">1724.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 24, fos. 79b, 81, 82, 82b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1725" name="note_1725" href="#noteref_1725">1725.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, fo. 85b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1726" name="note_1726" href="#noteref_1726">1726.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 24, fos. 105, 144.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1727" name="note_1727" href="#noteref_1727">1727.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, fo. 84b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1728" name="note_1728" href="#noteref_1728">1728.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Macaulay's "Essay on Lord Bacon."</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1729" name="note_1729" href="#noteref_1729">1729.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 24, fo. 145.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1730" name="note_1730" href="#noteref_1730">1730.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, fos. 146b, 149.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1731" name="note_1731" href="#noteref_1731">1731.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 24, fos. 110-111, 129b.; Repertory 23, fo. 594b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1732" name="note_1732" href="#noteref_1732">1732.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 24, fos. 124, 154b, 157b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1733" name="note_1733" href="#noteref_1733">1733.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The queen to the mayor, 25 July; the lords of the council to the
+same, 26 July.—Journal 24, fo. 142.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1734" name="note_1734" href="#noteref_1734">1734.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 24, fos. 173, 175.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1735" name="note_1735" href="#noteref_1735">1735.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The same dissatisfaction at the result of the Cadiz expedition so far
+as it affected the citizens of London was displayed in a previous letter
+from the mayor to the lords of the Privy Council (3 Nov.) in answer to
+a demand for 3,000 men and three ships to ride at Tilbury Hope and
+give notice of the approach of the Spanish fleet.—Remembrancia
+(Analytical Index), pp. 243, 244.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1736" name="note_1736" href="#noteref_1736">1736.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory 24, fo. 60b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1737" name="note_1737" href="#noteref_1737">1737.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 24, fos. 210b-213b, 216, 217.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1738" name="note_1738" href="#noteref_1738">1738.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 24, fos. 324b, 325, 329b; Repertory 24, fos. 268, 287,
+306; <span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span> 25, fo. 4b. Elizabeth asked for £40,000, but only succeeded
+in getting half that sum.—Chamberlain's Letters, p. 15.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1739" name="note_1739" href="#noteref_1739">1739.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 25, fos. 34, 47b, 48; Repertory 24, fo. 352b. In July,
+1600, a deputation was appointed to wait upon the lords of the council
+touching the repayment of this loan.—Repertory 25, fo. 119b. It still
+remained unpaid in Feb., 1604.—Journal 26, fo. 163b. By the end of
+1606 £20,000 had been paid off.—Remembrancia (Analytical Index),
+p. 188; Repertory 27, fo. 278. And by July, 1607, the whole was
+repaid.—Howes's Chron., p. 890.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1740" name="note_1740" href="#noteref_1740">1740.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 25, fos. 74b, 75, 77b-78b, 81, 81b, 82b-84, etc.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1741" name="note_1741" href="#noteref_1741">1741.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Chamberlain's Letters, p. 59.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1742" name="note_1742" href="#noteref_1742">1742.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 25, fo. 79b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1743" name="note_1743" href="#noteref_1743">1743.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">-<span class="tei tei-hi"><span style="font-style: italic">Id.</span></span>, fos. 80, 80b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1744" name="note_1744" href="#noteref_1744">1744.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Chamberlain's Letters, p. 59.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1745" name="note_1745" href="#noteref_1745">1745.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Chamberlain's Letters, p. 61; Journal 25, fos. 81, 84b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1746" name="note_1746" href="#noteref_1746">1746.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 25, fo. 238.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1747" name="note_1747" href="#noteref_1747">1747.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 25. fo. 245; Letter Book BB, fo. 85. He was deprived of
+his aldermanry of the Ward of Farringdon Without and debarred from
+ever becoming alderman of any other ward "for causes sufficiently
+made known" to the Court of Aldermen.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1748" name="note_1748" href="#noteref_1748">1748.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory 25, fos. 209b, 213.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1749" name="note_1749" href="#noteref_1749">1749.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Cal. State Papers Dom. (1598-1601), p. 546.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1750" name="note_1750" href="#noteref_1750">1750.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Secretary Cecil to the Lord Lieutenant of Ireland and others,
+10 Feb., 1601.—Cal. State Papers Dom. (1598-1601), p. 547.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1751" name="note_1751" href="#noteref_1751">1751.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Proclamation, dated 9 Feb., 1601.—Journal 25, fo. 240b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1752" name="note_1752" href="#noteref_1752">1752.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory 25, fos. 213, 246.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1753" name="note_1753" href="#noteref_1753">1753.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 25, fos. 242, 243, 243b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1754" name="note_1754" href="#noteref_1754">1754.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Cal. State Papers Dom. (1601-1603), pp. 16, 26, 89, 90.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1755" name="note_1755" href="#noteref_1755">1755.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 25, fos. 137, 161b, 166, 179, 189, 190, 218b, 223, 237,
+237b, 262b-265b, 293, 295, 301, 302b, 313b, 315; Journal 26, fos.
+16b-19.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1756" name="note_1756" href="#noteref_1756">1756.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory 25, fo. 296b.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1757" name="note_1757" href="#noteref_1757">1757.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Repertory 24, fos. 343, 354; Repertory 25, fos. 165-175. The
+Steelyard was re-opened in 1606.—Journal 27, fo. 66.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1758" name="note_1758" href="#noteref_1758">1758.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Letter from Sir Christopher Hatton to the mayor, 27 Nov.,
+1583.—Remembrancia (Analytical Index), p. 407.</p></dd><dt class="tei tei-notelabel"><a id="note_1759" name="note_1759" href="#noteref_1759">1759.</a></dt><dd class="tei tei-notetext"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Journal 26, fo. 42.</p></dd></dl>
+ </div>
+
+
+</div>
+
+<hr class="doublepage" /><div class="tei tei-div" style="margin-bottom: 5.00em; margin-top: 5.00em">
+<div id="pgfooter" class="tei tei-div" style="margin-bottom: 4.00em; margin-top: 4.00em"><pre class="pre tei tei-div" style="margin-bottom: 3.00em; margin-top: 3.00em">***END OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK LONDON AND THE KINGDOM - VOLUME I***
+</pre><hr class="doublepage" /><div class="tei tei-div" style="margin-bottom: 3.00em; margin-top: 3.00em"><a name="rightpageheader313" id="rightpageheader313"></a><a name="pgtoc314" id="pgtoc314"></a><a name="pdf315" id="pdf315"></a><h1 class="tei tei-head" style="text-align: left; margin-bottom: 3.46em; margin-top: 3.46em"><span style="font-size: 173%">Credits</span></h1><table summary="This is a list." class="tei tei-list" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em; margin-top: 1.00em"><tbody><tr><th class="tei tei-label tei-label-gloss">November 13, 2006  </th></tr><tr><td class="tei tei-item tei-item-gloss"><table summary="This is a list." class="tei tei-list" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em; margin-top: 1.00em"><tbody><tr class="tei tei-labelitem"><th class="tei tei-label"></th><td class="tei tei-item">Project Gutenberg Edition</td></tr><tr class="tei tei-labelitem"><th class="tei tei-label"></th><td class="tei tei-item"><span class="tei tei-respStmt">
+ <span class="tei tei-name">Paul Murray<br /></span>
+ <span class="tei tei-name">Joshua Hutchinson<br /></span>
+ <span class="tei tei-name">The Internet Archive/Canadian Libraries</span>
+ <span class="tei tei-name">Online Distributed Proofreading Team</span>
+ </span></td></tr></tbody></table></td></tr></tbody></table></div><hr class="doublepage" /><div class="tei tei-div" style="margin-bottom: 3.00em; margin-top: 3.00em"><a name="rightpageheader316" id="rightpageheader316"></a><a name="pgtoc317" id="pgtoc317"></a><a name="pdf318" id="pdf318"></a><h1 class="tei tei-head" style="text-align: left; margin-bottom: 3.46em; margin-top: 3.46em"><span style="font-size: 173%">A Word from Project Gutenberg</span></h1><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">This file should be named
+ 19800-h.html or
+ 19800-h.zip.</p><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">This and all associated files of various formats will be found
+ in:
+
+ <a href="http://www.gutenberg.org/dirs/1/9/8/0/19800/" class="block tei tei-xref" style="margin-bottom: 1.80em; margin-left: 3.60em; margin-top: 1.80em; margin-right: 3.60em"><span style="font-size: 90%">http://www.gutenberg.org</span><span style="font-size: 90%">/dirs/1/9/8/0/19800/</span></a></p><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Updated editions will replace the previous one — the old
+ editions will be renamed.</p><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Creating the works from public domain print editions means that
+ no one owns a United States copyright in these works, so the
+ Foundation (and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United
+ States without permission and without paying copyright royalties.
+ Special rules, set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this
+ license, apply to copying and distributing Project Gutenberg™ electronic works
+ to protect the Project Gutenberg™ concept and trademark. Project Gutenberg is a registered
+ trademark, and may not be used if you charge for the eBooks,
+ unless you receive specific permission. If you do not charge
+ anything for copies of this eBook, complying with the rules is
+ very easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose such as
+ creation of derivative works, reports, performances and research.
+ They may be modified and printed and given away — you may do
+ practically <em class="tei tei-emph"><span style="font-style: italic">anything</span></em> with public domain eBooks.
+ Redistribution is subject to the trademark license, especially
+ commercial redistribution.</p></div><hr class="page" /><div id="pglicense" class="tei tei-div" style="margin-bottom: 3.00em; margin-top: 3.00em"><a name="rightpageheader319" id="rightpageheader319"></a><a name="pgtoc320" id="pgtoc320"></a><a name="pdf321" id="pdf321"></a><h1 class="tei tei-head" style="text-align: left; margin-bottom: 3.46em; margin-top: 3.46em"><span style="font-size: 173%">The Full Project Gutenberg License</span></h1><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"><em class="tei tei-emph"><span style="font-style: italic">Please read this before you distribute or use this
+ work.</span></em></p><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">To protect the Project Gutenberg™ mission of promoting the free
+ distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing
+ this work (or any other work associated in any way with the
+ phrase <span class="tei tei-q">“Project Gutenberg”</span>), you agree to comply with all the terms
+ of the Full Project Gutenberg™ License (<a href="#pglicense" class="tei tei-ref">available with this file</a> or online
+ at <a href="http://www.gutenberg.org/license" class="tei tei-xref">http://www.gutenberg.org/license</a>).</p><div id="pglicense1" class="tei tei-div" style="margin-bottom: 2.00em; margin-top: 2.00em"><h2 class="tei tei-head" style="text-align: left; margin-bottom: 2.88em; margin-top: 2.88em"><span style="font-size: 144%">Section 1.</span></h2><h2 class="tei tei-head" style="text-align: center; margin-bottom: 2.40em; margin-top: 2.40em"><span style="font-size: 120%">General Terms of Use &amp; Redistributing Project Gutenberg™
+ electronic works</span></h2><div id="pglicense1A" class="tei tei-div" style="margin-bottom: 2.00em; margin-top: 2.00em"><h3 class="tei tei-head" style="text-align: left; margin-bottom: 2.40em; margin-top: 2.40em"><span style="font-size: 120%">1.A.</span></h3><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg™ electronic
+ work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to
+ and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual
+ property (trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree
+ to abide by all the terms of this agreement, you must cease
+ using and return or destroy all copies of Project Gutenberg™ electronic
+ works in your possession. If you paid a fee for obtaining a
+ copy of or access to a Project Gutenberg™ electronic work and you do not
+ agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement, you may
+ obtain a refund from the person or entity to whom you paid the
+ fee as set forth in paragraph <a href="#pglicense1E8" class="tei tei-ref">1.E.8.</a></p></div><div id="pglicense1B" class="tei tei-div" style="margin-bottom: 2.00em; margin-top: 2.00em"><h3 class="tei tei-head" style="text-align: left; margin-bottom: 2.40em; margin-top: 2.40em"><span style="font-size: 120%">1.B.</span></h3><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"><span class="tei tei-q">“Project Gutenberg”</span> is a registered trademark. It may only be used on or
+ associated in any way with an electronic work by people who agree to be
+ bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few things that you
+ can do with most Project Gutenberg™ electronic works even without complying with the
+ full terms of this agreement. See paragraph <a href="#pglicense1C" class="tei tei-ref">1.C</a> below. There are a lot of things you can
+ do with Project Gutenberg™ electronic works if you follow the terms of this
+ agreement and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg™ electronic
+ works. See paragraph <a href="#pglicense1E" class="tei tei-ref">1.E</a> below.</p></div><div id="pglicense1C" class="tei tei-div" style="margin-bottom: 2.00em; margin-top: 2.00em"><h3 class="tei tei-head" style="text-align: left; margin-bottom: 2.40em; margin-top: 2.40em"><span style="font-size: 120%">1.C.</span></h3><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation (<span class="tei tei-q">“the Foundation”</span> or PGLAF), owns a compilation
+ copyright in the collection of Project Gutenberg™ electronic works. Nearly all the
+ individual works in the collection are in the public domain in the
+ United States. If an individual work is in the public domain in the
+ United States and you are located in the United States, we do not claim
+ a right to prevent you from copying, distributing, performing,
+ displaying or creating derivative works based on the work as long as all
+ references to Project Gutenberg are removed. Of course, we hope that you will support
+ the Project Gutenberg™ mission of promoting free access to electronic works by
+ freely sharing Project Gutenberg™ works in compliance with the terms of this
+ agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg™ name associated with the work. You can
+ easily comply with the terms of this agreement by keeping this work in
+ the same format with its attached full Project Gutenberg™ License when you share it
+ without charge with others.</p></div><div id="pglicense1D" class="tei tei-div" style="margin-bottom: 2.00em; margin-top: 2.00em"><h3 class="tei tei-head" style="text-align: left; margin-bottom: 2.40em; margin-top: 2.40em"><span style="font-size: 120%">1.D.</span></h3><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern
+ what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are in
+ a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States, check
+ the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this agreement
+ before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, distributing or
+ creating derivative works based on this work or any other Project Gutenberg™ work.
+ The Foundation makes no representations concerning the copyright status
+ of any work in any country outside the United States.</p></div><div id="pglicense1E" class="tei tei-div" style="margin-bottom: 2.00em; margin-top: 2.00em"><h3 class="tei tei-head" style="text-align: left; margin-bottom: 2.40em; margin-top: 2.40em"><span style="font-size: 120%">1.E.</span></h3><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg:</p><div id="pglicense1E1" class="tei tei-div" style="margin-bottom: 2.00em; margin-top: 2.00em"><h4 class="tei tei-head" style="text-align: left; margin-bottom: 2.00em; margin-top: 2.00em">1.E.1.</h4><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate
+ access to, the full Project Gutenberg™ License must appear prominently whenever any
+ copy of a Project Gutenberg™ work (any work on which the phrase <span class="tei tei-q">“Project Gutenberg”</span>
+ appears, or with which the phrase <span class="tei tei-q">“Project Gutenberg”</span> is associated) is
+ accessed, displayed, performed, viewed, copied or distributed:
+
+ </p><div class="block tei tei-q" style="margin-bottom: 1.80em; margin-left: 3.60em; margin-top: 1.80em; margin-right: 3.60em"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 0.90em"><span style="font-size: 90%">This eBook is for the use of
+ anyone anywhere at no cost and with almost no
+ restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it
+ away or re-use it under the terms of the Project
+ Gutenberg License included with this eBook or
+ online at </span><a href="http://www.gutenberg.org" class="tei tei-xref"><span style="font-size: 90%">http://www.gutenberg.org</span></a></p></div></div><div id="pglicense1E2" class="tei tei-div" style="margin-bottom: 2.00em; margin-top: 2.00em"><h4 class="tei tei-head" style="text-align: left; margin-bottom: 2.00em; margin-top: 2.00em">1.E.2.</h4><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">If an individual Project Gutenberg™ electronic work is derived from the public
+ domain (does not contain a notice indicating that it is posted with
+ permission of the copyright holder), the work can be copied and
+ distributed to anyone in the United States without paying any fees or
+ charges. If you are redistributing or providing access to a work with
+ the phrase <span class="tei tei-q">“Project Gutenberg”</span> associated with or appearing on the work, you
+ must comply either with the requirements of paragraphs <a href="#pglicense1E1" class="tei tei-ref">1.E.1</a> through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for
+ the use of the work and the Project Gutenberg™ trademark as set forth in paragraphs
+ <a href="#pglicense1E8" class="tei tei-ref">1.E.8</a> or 1.E.9.</p></div><div id="pglicense1E3" class="tei tei-div" style="margin-bottom: 2.00em; margin-top: 2.00em"><h4 class="tei tei-head" style="text-align: left; margin-bottom: 2.00em; margin-top: 2.00em">1.E.3.</h4><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">If an individual Project Gutenberg™ electronic work is posted with the permission
+ of the copyright holder, your use and distribution must comply with both
+ paragraphs <a href="#pglicense1E1" class="tei tei-ref">1.E.1</a> through 1.E.7 and any
+ additional terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms will
+ be linked to the Project Gutenberg™ License for all works posted with the permission
+ of the copyright holder found at the beginning of this work.</p></div><div id="pglicense1E4" class="tei tei-div" style="margin-bottom: 2.00em; margin-top: 2.00em"><h4 class="tei tei-head" style="text-align: left; margin-bottom: 2.00em; margin-top: 2.00em">1.E.4.</h4><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg™ License terms from
+ this work, or any files containing a part of this work or any other work
+ associated with Project Gutenberg™.</p></div><div id="pglicense1E5" class="tei tei-div" style="margin-bottom: 2.00em; margin-top: 2.00em"><h4 class="tei tei-head" style="text-align: left; margin-bottom: 2.00em; margin-top: 2.00em">1.E.5.</h4><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this
+ electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without
+ prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph <a href="#pglicense1E1" class="tei tei-ref">1.E.1</a> with active links or immediate access
+ to the full terms of the Project Gutenberg™ License.</p></div><div id="pglicense1E6" class="tei tei-div" style="margin-bottom: 2.00em; margin-top: 2.00em"><h4 class="tei tei-head" style="text-align: left; margin-bottom: 2.00em; margin-top: 2.00em">1.E.6.</h4><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary,
+ compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including
+ any word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access
+ to or distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg™ work in a format other than
+ <span class="tei tei-q">“Plain Vanilla ASCII”</span> or other format used in the official
+ version posted on the official Project Gutenberg™ web site (http://www.gutenberg.org), you must, at
+ no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a copy, a
+ means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon
+ request, of the work in its original <span class="tei tei-q">“Plain Vanilla ASCII”</span> or
+ other form. Any alternate format must include the full Project Gutenberg™ License
+ as specified in paragraph <a href="#pglicense1E1" class="tei tei-ref">1.E.1.</a></p></div><div id="pglicense1E7" class="tei tei-div" style="margin-bottom: 2.00em; margin-top: 2.00em"><h4 class="tei tei-head" style="text-align: left; margin-bottom: 2.00em; margin-top: 2.00em">1.E.7.</h4><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying, performing,
+ copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg™ works unless you comply with
+ paragraph <a href="#pglicense1E8" class="tei tei-ref">1.E.8</a> or 1.E.9.</p></div><div id="pglicense1E8" class="tei tei-div" style="margin-bottom: 2.00em; margin-top: 2.00em"><h4 class="tei tei-head" style="text-align: left; margin-bottom: 2.00em; margin-top: 2.00em">1.E.8.</h4><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing access to
+ or distributing Project Gutenberg™ electronic works provided that</p><table summary="This is a list." class="tei tei-list" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em; margin-top: 1.00em"><tbody><tr class="tei tei-labelitem"><th class="tei tei-label">•  </th><td class="tei tei-item"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from
+ the use of Project Gutenberg™ works calculated using the method you already use to
+ calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is owed to the owner of the
+ Project Gutenberg™ trademark, but he has agreed to donate royalties under this
+ paragraph to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments must be paid within 60 days
+ following each date on which you prepare (or are legally required to
+ prepare) your periodic tax returns. Royalty payments should be clearly
+ marked as such and sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the address specified in <a href="#pglicense4" class="tei tei-ref">Section 4, <span class="tei tei-q">“Information about donations to the
+ Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation.”</span></a></p></td></tr><tr class="tei tei-labelitem"><th class="tei tei-label">•  </th><td class="tei tei-item"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies
+ you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he does
+ not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg™ License. You must require such
+ a user to return or destroy all copies of the works possessed in a
+ physical medium and discontinue all use of and all access to other
+ copies of Project Gutenberg™ works.</p></td></tr><tr class="tei tei-labelitem"><th class="tei tei-label">•  </th><td class="tei tei-item"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">You provide, in accordance with paragraph <a href="#pglicense1F3" class="tei tei-ref">1.F.3</a>, a full refund of any money paid for a
+ work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the electronic work is
+ discovered and reported to you within 90 days of receipt of the
+ work.</p></td></tr><tr class="tei tei-labelitem"><th class="tei tei-label">•  </th><td class="tei tei-item"><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
+ distribution of Project Gutenberg™ works.</p></td></tr></tbody></table></div><div id="pglicense1E9" class="tei tei-div" style="margin-bottom: 2.00em; margin-top: 2.00em"><h4 class="tei tei-head" style="text-align: left; margin-bottom: 2.00em; margin-top: 2.00em">1.E.9.</h4><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg™ electronic work or
+ group of works on different terms than are set forth in this agreement,
+ you must obtain permission in writing from both the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and Michael
+ Hart, the owner of the Project Gutenberg™ trademark. Contact the Foundation as set
+ forth in <a href="#pglicense3" class="tei tei-ref">Section 3</a> below.</p></div></div><div id="pglicense1F" class="tei tei-div" style="margin-bottom: 2.00em; margin-top: 2.00em"><h3 class="tei tei-head" style="text-align: left; margin-bottom: 2.40em; margin-top: 2.40em"><span style="font-size: 120%">1.F.</span></h3><div id="pglicense1F1" class="tei tei-div" style="margin-bottom: 2.00em; margin-top: 2.00em"><h4 class="tei tei-head" style="text-align: left; margin-bottom: 2.00em; margin-top: 2.00em">1.F.1.</h4><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable effort to identify,
+ do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread public domain works
+ in creating the Project Gutenberg™ collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg™
+ electronic works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may
+ contain <span class="tei tei-q">“Defects,”</span> such as, but not limited to, incomplete,
+ inaccurate or corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other
+ intellectual property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other
+ medium, a computer virus, or computer codes that damage or cannot be
+ read by your equipment.</p></div><div id="pglicense1F2" class="tei tei-div" style="margin-bottom: 2.00em; margin-top: 2.00em"><h4 class="tei tei-head" style="text-align: left; margin-bottom: 2.00em; margin-top: 2.00em">1.F.2.</h4><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES — Except for the <span class="tei tei-q">“Right of
+ Replacement or Refund”</span> described in <a href="#pglicense1F3" class="tei tei-ref">paragraph
+ 1.F.3</a>, the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project Gutenberg™ trademark, and any
+ other party distributing a Project Gutenberg™ electronic work under this agreement,
+ disclaim all liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including
+ legal fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT
+ LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE
+ PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH F3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE TRADEMARK
+ OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE LIABLE TO
+ YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR INCIDENTAL
+ DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.</p></div><div id="pglicense1F3" class="tei tei-div" style="margin-bottom: 2.00em; margin-top: 2.00em"><h4 class="tei tei-head" style="text-align: left; margin-bottom: 2.00em; margin-top: 2.00em">1.F.3.</h4><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND — If you discover a defect in
+ this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can receive a
+ refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a written
+ explanation to the person you received the work from. If you received
+ the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium with your
+ written explanation. The person or entity that provided you with the
+ defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu of a
+ refund. If you received the work electronically, the person or entity
+ providing it to you may choose to give you a second opportunity to
+ receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If the second copy
+ is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing without further
+ opportunities to fix the problem.</p></div><div id="pglicense1F4" class="tei tei-div" style="margin-bottom: 2.00em; margin-top: 2.00em"><h4 class="tei tei-head" style="text-align: left; margin-bottom: 2.00em; margin-top: 2.00em">1.F.4.</h4><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth in
+ <a href="#pglicense1F3" class="tei tei-ref">paragraph 1.F.3</a>, this work is provided
+ to you 'AS-IS,' WITH NO OTHER WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR
+ IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTIBILITY OR
+ FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.</p></div><div id="pglicense1F5" class="tei tei-div" style="margin-bottom: 2.00em; margin-top: 2.00em"><h4 class="tei tei-head" style="text-align: left; margin-bottom: 2.00em; margin-top: 2.00em">1.F.5.</h4><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied warranties or
+ the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages. If any
+ disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the law of
+ the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be
+ interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by
+ the applicable state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any
+ provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions.</p></div><div id="pglicense1F6" class="tei tei-div" style="margin-bottom: 2.00em; margin-top: 2.00em"><h4 class="tei tei-head" style="text-align: left; margin-bottom: 2.00em; margin-top: 2.00em">1.F.6.</h4><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">INDEMNITY — You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the
+ trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone
+ providing copies of Project Gutenberg™ electronic works in accordance with this
+ agreement, and any volunteers associated with the production, promotion
+ and distribution of Project Gutenberg™ electronic works, harmless from all
+ liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees, that arise directly
+ or indirectly from any of the following which you do or cause to occur:
+ (a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg™ work, (b) alteration,
+ modification, or additions or deletions to any Project Gutenberg™ work, and (c) any
+ Defect you cause.</p></div></div></div><div id="pglicense2" class="tei tei-div" style="margin-bottom: 2.00em; margin-top: 2.00em"><h2 class="tei tei-head" style="text-align: left; margin-bottom: 2.88em; margin-top: 2.88em"><span style="font-size: 144%">Section 2.</span></h2><h2 class="tei tei-head" style="text-align: center; margin-bottom: 2.40em; margin-top: 2.40em"><span style="font-size: 120%">Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg™</span></h2><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Project Gutenberg™ is synonymous with the free distribution of electronic works
+ in formats readable by the widest variety of computers including
+ obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It exists because of the
+ efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations from people in all walks
+ of life.</p><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the
+ assistance they need, is critical to reaching Project Gutenberg™'s goals and
+ ensuring that the Project Gutenberg™ collection will remain freely available for
+ generations to come. In 2001, the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a
+ secure and permanent future for Project Gutenberg™ and future generations. To learn
+ more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and how your efforts and donations can help, see
+ Sections <a href="#pglicense3" class="tei tei-ref">3</a> and <a href="#pglicense4" class="tei tei-ref">4</a> and the Foundation web page at <a href="http://www.pglaf.org" class="tei tei-xref">http://www.pglaf.org</a>.</p></div><div id="pglicense3" class="tei tei-div" style="margin-bottom: 2.00em; margin-top: 2.00em"><h2 class="tei tei-head" style="text-align: left; margin-bottom: 2.88em; margin-top: 2.88em"><span style="font-size: 144%">Section 3.</span></h2><h2 class="tei tei-head" style="text-align: center; margin-bottom: 2.40em; margin-top: 2.40em"><span style="font-size: 120%">Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation</span></h2><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non profit 501(c)(3) educational corporation
+ organized under the laws of the state of Mississippi and granted tax
+ exempt status by the Internal Revenue Service. The Foundation's EIN or
+ federal tax identification number is 64-6221541. Its 501(c)(3) letter
+ is posted at <a href="http://www.gutenberg.org/fundraising/pglaf" class="tei tei-xref">http://www.gutenberg.org/fundraising/pglaf</a>. Contributions
+ to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent permitted by U.S.
+ federal laws and your state's laws.</p><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The Foundation's principal office is located at 4557 Melan Dr.
+ S. Fairbanks, AK, 99712., but its volunteers and employees are
+ scattered throughout numerous locations. Its business office is
+ located at 809 North 1500 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801)
+ 596-1887, email business@pglaf.org. Email contact links and up to date
+ contact information can be found at the Foundation's web site and
+ official page at <a href="http://www.pglaf.org" class="tei tei-xref">http://www.pglaf.org</a></p><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">For additional contact information:
+
+ </p><div class="block tei tei-address" style="margin-bottom: 1.80em; margin-left: 3.60em; margin-top: 1.80em; margin-right: 3.60em"><span class="tei tei-addrLine"><span style="font-size: 90%">Dr. Gregory B. Newby</span></span><br /><span class="tei tei-addrLine"><span style="font-size: 90%">Chief Executive and Director</span></span><br /><span class="tei tei-addrLine"><span style="font-size: 90%">gbnewby@pglaf.org</span></span><br /></div></div><div id="pglicense4" class="tei tei-div" style="margin-bottom: 2.00em; margin-top: 2.00em"><h2 class="tei tei-head" style="text-align: left; margin-bottom: 2.88em; margin-top: 2.88em"><span style="font-size: 144%">Section 4.</span></h2><h2 class="tei tei-head" style="text-align: center; margin-bottom: 2.40em; margin-top: 2.40em"><span style="font-size: 120%">Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation</span></h2><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Project Gutenberg™ depends upon and cannot survive without wide spread public
+ support and donations to carry out its mission of increasing the number
+ of public domain and licensed works that can be freely distributed in
+ machine readable form accessible by the widest array of equipment
+ including outdated equipment. Many small donations ($1 to $5,000) are
+ particularly important to maintaining tax exempt status with the
+ IRS.</p><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating
+ charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United
+ States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a
+ considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up
+ with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations where
+ we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To SEND
+ DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any particular state
+ visit <a href="http://www.gutenberg.org/fundraising/donate" class="tei tei-xref">http://www.gutenberg.org/fundraising/donate</a></p><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we
+ have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition
+ against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who
+ approach us with offers to donate.</p><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make
+ any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from
+ outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff.</p><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation methods and
+ addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other ways including
+ checks, online payments and credit card donations. To donate, please
+ visit: <a href="http://www.gutenberg.org/fundraising/donate" class="tei tei-xref">http://www.gutenberg.org/fundraising/donate</a></p></div><div id="pglicense5" class="tei tei-div" style="margin-bottom: 2.00em; margin-top: 2.00em"><h2 class="tei tei-head" style="text-align: left; margin-bottom: 2.88em; margin-top: 2.88em"><span style="font-size: 144%">Section 5.</span></h2><h2 class="tei tei-head" style="text-align: center; margin-bottom: 2.40em; margin-top: 2.40em"><span style="font-size: 120%">General Information About Project Gutenberg™ electronic
+ works.</span></h2><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em"><span class="tei tei-name">Professor Michael S. Hart</span> is the
+ originator of the Project Gutenberg™ concept of a library of electronic works that
+ could be freely shared with anyone. For thirty years, he produced and
+ distributed Project Gutenberg™ eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer
+ support.</p><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Project Gutenberg™ eBooks are often created from several printed editions, all of
+ which are confirmed as Public Domain in the U.S. unless a copyright
+ notice is included. Thus, we do not necessarily keep eBooks in
+ compliance with any particular paper edition.</p><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Each eBook is in a subdirectory of the same number as the eBook's
+ eBook number, often in several formats including plain vanilla ASCII,
+ compressed (zipped), HTML and others.</p><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Corrected <em class="tei tei-emph"><span style="font-style: italic">editions</span></em> of our eBooks replace the old file
+ and take over the old filename and etext number. The replaced older file
+ is renamed. <em class="tei tei-emph"><span style="font-style: italic">Versions</span></em> based on separate sources are treated
+ as new eBooks receiving new filenames and etext numbers.</p><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search
+ facility:
+
+ <a href="http://www.gutenberg.org" class="block tei tei-xref" style="margin-bottom: 1.80em; margin-left: 3.60em; margin-top: 1.80em; margin-right: 3.60em"><span style="font-size: 90%">http://www.gutenberg.org</span></a></p><p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 1.00em">This Web site includes information about Project Gutenberg™, including how to
+ make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and
+ how to subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks.</p></div></div></div>
+</div>
+
+</div>
+
+ </div>
+</body></html>
diff --git a/19800-h/images/image01.png b/19800-h/images/image01.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..1834470
--- /dev/null
+++ b/19800-h/images/image01.png
Binary files differ
diff --git a/19800-h/images/image02.png b/19800-h/images/image02.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..bd917bb
--- /dev/null
+++ b/19800-h/images/image02.png
Binary files differ