diff options
Diffstat (limited to '19367-h')
| -rw-r--r-- | 19367-h/19367-h.htm | 2321 |
1 files changed, 2321 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/19367-h/19367-h.htm b/19367-h/19367-h.htm new file mode 100644 index 0000000..bc25899 --- /dev/null +++ b/19367-h/19367-h.htm @@ -0,0 +1,2321 @@ +<!DOCTYPE html + PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" + "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd"> +<html> +<head> +<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=US-ASCII" /> +<title>Romance</title> + <style type="text/css"> +/*<![CDATA[ XML blockout */ +<!-- + P { margin-top: .75em; + margin-bottom: .75em; + } + H1, H2 { + text-align: center; + margin-top: 2em; + margin-bottom: 2em; + } + H3, H4 { + text-align: left; + margin-top: 1em; + margin-bottom: 1em; + } + BODY{margin-left: 10%; + margin-right: 10%; + } + TD { vertical-align: top; } + .blkquot {margin-left: 4em; margin-right: 4em;} /* block indent */ + + .smcap {font-variant: small-caps;} + + .pagenum {position: absolute; + left: 92%; + font-size: smaller; + text-align: right; + color: gray;} + + .citation {vertical-align: super; + font-size: .8em; + text-decoration: none;} + // --> + /* XML end ]]>*/ + </style> +</head> +<body> +<h2> +<a href="#startoftext">Romance, by Walter Raleigh</a> +</h2> +<pre> +The Project Gutenberg eBook, Romance, by Walter Raleigh + + +This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with +almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or +re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included +with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org + + + + + +Title: Romance + Two Lectures + + +Author: Walter Raleigh + + + +Release Date: September 25, 2006 [eBook #19367] + +Language: English + +Character set encoding: ISO-646-US (US-ASCII) + + +***START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK ROMANCE*** +</pre> +<p><a name="startoftext"></a></p> +<p>Transcribed from the 1916 Princeton University Press edition +by David Price, email ccx074@pglaf.org</p> +<p style="text-align: center">LOUIS CLARK VANUXEM FOUNDATION</p> +<h1>ROMANCE</h1> +<p style="text-align: center"><span class="smcap">two lectures +by</span></p> +<p style="text-align: center">SIR WALTER RALEIGH</p> +<p style="text-align: center"><span class="smcap">m.a.</span>, +<span class="smcap">professor of english literature in +the</span><br /> +<span class="smcap">university of oxford, fellow of</span><br /> +<span class="smcap">merton college</span></p> +<p style="text-align: center"><span class="smcap">lectures +delivered at princeton</span><br /> +<span class="smcap">university</span>, <span class="smcap">may +4th and 6th</span>, <span class="smcap">1915</span></p> +<p style="text-align: center">PRINCETON UNIVERSITY PRESS<br /> +PRINCETON</p> +<p style="text-align: center">LONDON: HUMPHREY MILFORD<br /> +OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS</p> +<p style="text-align: center">1916</p> +<p style="text-align: center"><!-- page ii--><a +name="pageii"></a><span class="pagenum">p. ii</span>Copyright, +1916, by<br /> +<span class="smcap">Princeton University Press</span></p> +<p style="text-align: center">Published October, 1916</p> +<h2><!-- page 1--><a name="page1"></a><span class="pagenum">p. +1</span>THE ORIGIN OF ROMANCE</h2> +<p>The period of English political history which falls between +Pitt’s acceptance of office as prime minister, in 1783, and +the passing of the Reform Bill, in 1832, is a period rich in +character and event. The same period of fifty years is one +of the most crowded epochs of our national literature. In +1783 William Blake produced his <i>Poetical Sketches</i>, and +George Crabbe published <i>The Village</i>. In 1832 Scott +died, not many months after the death of Goethe. Between +these two dates a great company of English writers produced a +literature of immense bulk, and of almost endless diversity of +character. Yet one dominant strain in that literature has +commonly been allowed to give a name to the whole period, and it +is often called the Age of the Romantic Revival.</p> +<p>We do not name other notable periods of our literature in this +fashion. The name itself <!-- page 2--><a +name="page2"></a><span class="pagenum">p. 2</span>contains a +theory, and so marks the rise of a new philosophical and +aesthetic criticism. It attempts to describe as well as to +name, and attaches significance not to kings, or great authors, +but to the kind of writing which flourished conspicuously in that +age. A less ambitious and much more secure name would have +been the Age of George III; but this name has seldom been used, +perhaps because the writers of his time who reverenced King +George III were not very many in number. The danger of +basing a name on a theory of literature is that the theory may +very easily be superseded, or may prove to be inadequate, and +then the name, having become immutable by the force of custom, is +left standing, a monument of ancient error. The terminology +of the sciences, which pretends to be exact and colourless, is +always being reduced to emptiness by the progress of +knowledge. The thing that struck the first observer is +proved to be less important than he thought it. Scientific +names, for all their air of learned universality, are merely +fossilized impressions, stereotyped portraits of a single +aspect. The decorous obscurity of the <!-- page 3--><a +name="page3"></a><span class="pagenum">p. 3</span>ancient +languages is used to conceal an immense diversity of +principle. Mammal, amphibian, coleoptera, dicotyledon, +cryptogam,—all these terms, which, if they were translated +into the language of a peasant, would be seen to record very +simple observations, yet do lend a kind of formal majesty to +ignorance.</p> +<p>So it is with the vocabulary of literary criticism: the first +use of a name, because the name was coined by someone who felt +the need of it, is often striking and instructive; the impression +is fresh and new. Then the freshness wears off it, and the +name becomes an outworn print, a label that serves only to recall +the memory of past travel. What was created for the needs +of thought becomes a thrifty device, useful only to save +thinking. The best way to restore the habit of thinking is +to do away with the names. The word Romantic loses almost +all its meaning and value when it is used to characterize whole +periods of our literature. Landor and Crabbe belong to a +Romantic era of poetry; Steele and Sterne wrote prose in an age +which set before itself the Classic ideal. Yet there is +hardly any distinctively Classical beauty in <!-- page 4--><a +name="page4"></a><span class="pagenum">p. 4</span>English verse +which cannot be exemplified from the poetry of Landor and Crabbe; +and there are not very many characteristics of Romantic prose +which find no illustration in the writings of Steele and +Sterne. Nevertheless, the very name of romance has wielded +such a power in human affairs, and has so habitually impressed +the human imagination, that time is not misspent in exhibiting +its historical bearings. These great vague words, invented +to facilitate reference to whole centuries of human +history—Middle Ages, Renaissance, Protestant Reformation, +Revival of Romance—are very often invoked as if they were +something ultimate, as if the names themselves were a sufficient +explanation of all that they include. So an imperfect +terminology is used to gain esteem for an artificial and rigid +conception of things which were as fluid as life itself. +The Renaissance, for instance, in its strict original meaning, is +the name for that renewed study of the classical literatures +which manifested itself throughout the chief countries of Europe +in the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries. In Italy, where +the movement had its origin, no <!-- page 5--><a +name="page5"></a><span class="pagenum">p. 5</span>single +conspicuous event can be used to date it. The traditions +inherited from Greece and Rome had never lost their authority; +but with the increase of wealth and leisure in the city republics +they were renewed and strengthened. From being remnants and +memories they became live models; Latin poetry was revived, and +Italian poetry was disciplined by the ancient masters. But +the Renaissance, when it reached the shores of England, so far +from giving new life to the literature it found there, at first +degraded it. It killed the splendid prose school of Malory +and Berners, and prose did not run clear again for a +century. It bewildered and confused the minds of poets, and +blending itself with the national tradition, produced the rich +lawlessness of the English sixteenth century. It was a +strong tributary to the stream of our national literature; but +the popular usage, which assigns all that is good in the English +literature of the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries to a +mysterious event called the Renaissance, is merely absurd. +Modern scholars, if they are forced to find a beginning for +modern literature, would prefer to <!-- page 6--><a +name="page6"></a><span class="pagenum">p. 6</span>date it from +the wonderful outburst of vernacular poetry in the latter part of +the twelfth century, and, if they must name a birthplace, would +claim attention for the Court of King Henry II.</p> +<p>In some of its aspects, the Romantic revival may be exhibited +as a natural consequence of the Renaissance. Classical +scholarship at first scorned the vernacular literatures, and did +all its work of criticism and imitation in the Latin +tongue. By degrees the lesson was widened, and applied to +the modern languages. Study; imitation in Latin; extension +of classical usages and principles to modern +literature,—these were the regular stages in the progress +of the classical influence. When the poets of France and +England, to name no others, had learned as much as they were able +and willing to learn from the masters of Greece and Rome, the +work of the Renaissance was done. By the middle of the +eighteenth century there was no notable kind of Greek or Latin +literature—historical, philosophical, poetical; epic, +elegy, ode, satire—which had not worthy disciples and +rivals in the literatures of France and England. <!-- page +7--><a name="page7"></a><span class="pagenum">p. 7</span>Nothing +remained to do but to go further afield and seek for new +masters. These might easily have been found among the poets +and prophets of the East, and not a few notable writers of the +time began to forage in that direction. But the East was +too remote and strange, and its languages were too little known, +for this attempt to be carried far; the imitation of Chinese and +Persian models was practised chiefly by way of fantasy and +joke. The study of the neglected and forgotten matter of +mediaeval times, on the other hand, was undertaken by serious +scholars. The progress of the mediaeval influence +reproduced very exactly the successive phases of the Classical +Renaissance. At first there was study; and books like +Sainte Palaye’s <i>Memoirs of Ancient Chivalry</i>, and +Paul Henri Mallet’s <i>Northern Antiquities</i>, enjoyed a +European reputation. Then followed the period of forgery +and imitation, the age of Ossian and Chatterton, Horace Walpole +and Bishop Percy. Lastly, the poets enrolled themselves in +the new school, and an original literature, suggested by the old, +was created by Sir Walter <!-- page 8--><a name="page8"></a><span +class="pagenum">p. 8</span>Scott, Coleridge, and Keats. It +was the temper of the antiquary and the sceptic, in the age of +Gibbon and Hume, that begot the Romantic Revival; and the +rebellion of the younger age against the spirit of the eighteenth +century was the rebellion of a child against its parents.</p> +<p>It is not needful, nor indeed is it possible, to define +Romance. In the mathematical sciences definitions are +all-important, because with them the definition is the +thing. When a mathematician asks you to describe a circle, +he asks you to create one. But the man who asks you to +describe a monkey is less exacting; he will be content if you +mention some of the features that seem to you to distinguish a +monkey from other animals. Such a description must needs be +based on personal impressions and ideas; some features must be +chosen as being more significant than the rest. In the +history of literature there are only two really significant +things—men, and books. To study the ascertained facts +concerning men and books is to study biography and bibliography, +two sciences which between them supply the only <!-- page 9--><a +name="page9"></a><span class="pagenum">p. 9</span>competent and +modest part of the history of literature. To discern the +significance of men and books, to classify and explain them, is +another matter. We have not, and we never shall have, a +calculus sufficient for human life even at its weakest and +poorest. Let him who conceives high hopes from the progress +of knowledge and the pertinacity of thought tame and subdue his +pride by considering, for a moment, the game of chess. That +game is played with thirty-two pieces, of six different kinds, on +a board of sixty-four squares. Each kind of piece has one +allotted mode of action, which is further cramped by severe +limitations of space. The conditions imposed upon the game +are strict, uniform, and mechanical. Yet those who have +made of chess a life-long study are ready to confess their +complete ignorance of the fundamental merits of particular moves; +one game does not resemble another; and from the most commonplace +of developments there may spring up, on the sudden, wild romantic +possibilities and situations that are like miracles. If +these surprising flowers of fancy grow on the chess-board, how +shall we set a limit to the <!-- page 10--><a +name="page10"></a><span class="pagenum">p. 10</span>possibilities +of human life, which is chess, with variety and uncertainty many +million times increased? It is prudent, therefore, to say +little of the laws which govern the course of human history, to +avoid, except for pastime, the discussion of tendencies and +movements, and to speak chiefly of men and books. If an +author can be exhibited as the effect of certain causes (and I do +not deny that some authors can plausibly be so exhibited) he +loses his virtue as an author. He thought of himself as a +cause, a surprising intruder upon the routine of the world, an +original creator. I think that he is right, and that the +profitable study of a man is the study which regards him as an +oddity, not a quiddity.</p> +<p>A general statement of the law that governs literary history +may perhaps be borrowed from the most unreasonable of the +arts—the art of dress. One of the powerful rulers of +men, and therefore of books, is Fashion, and the fluctuations of +literary fashion make up a great part of literary history. +If the history of a single fashion in dress could ever be +written, it would illuminate the literary problem. <!-- +page 11--><a name="page11"></a><span class="pagenum">p. +11</span>The motives at work are the same; thoughtful wearers of +clothes, like thoughtful authors, are all trying to do something +new, within the limits assigned by practical utility and social +sympathy. Each desires to express himself and yet in that +very act to win the admiration and liking of his fellows. +The great object is to wear the weeds of humanity with a +difference. Some authors, it is true, like timid or lazy +dressers, desire only to conform to usage. But these, as M. +Brunetière remarks in one of his historical essays, are +precisely the authors who do not count. An author who +respects himself is not content if his work is mistaken for +another’s, even if that other be one of the gods of his +idolatry. He would rather write his own signature across +faulty work than sink into a copyist of merit. This eternal +temper of self-assertion, this spirit of invention, this +determination to add something or alter something, is no doubt +the principle of life. It questions accepted standards, and +makes of reaction from the reigning fashion a permanent force in +literature. The young want something to do; they will not +be loyal subjects in a kingdom <!-- page 12--><a +name="page12"></a><span class="pagenum">p. 12</span>where no land +remains to be taken up, nor will they allow the praise of the +dead to be the last word in criticism. Why should they +paraphrase old verdicts?</p> +<p>The sway of Fashion often bears hardest on a good author just +dead, when the generation that discovered him and acclaimed him +begins to pass away. Then it is not what he did that +attracts the notice of the younger sort, but what he left +undone. Tennyson is discovered to be no great +thinker. Pope, who, when his star was in the ascendant, was +“Mr. Pope, the new Poet,” has to submit to +examination by the Headmaster of Winchester, who decides that he +is not a poet, except in an inferior sense. Shakespeare is +dragged to the bar by Thomas Rymer, who demonstrates, with what +degree of critical ability is still disputed, but certainly in +clear and vigorous English, that Shakespeare has no capacity for +tragic writing. Dante is banished, by the critics of the +Renaissance, into the Gothic darkness. So the pendulum of +fashion swings to and fro, compelled, even in the shortest of its +variable oscillations, to revisit the greatest writers, who are +nearest <!-- page 13--><a name="page13"></a><span +class="pagenum">p. 13</span>to the centre of rest. Wit and +sense, which are raised by one age into the very essentials of +good poetry, are denied the name of poetry by the next; +sentiment, the virtue of one age, is the exploded vice of +another; and Romance comes in and goes out with secular +regularity.</p> +<p>The meaning of Romance will never come home to him who seeks +for it in modern controversies. The name Romance is itself +a memorial of the conquest of Europe by the Romans. They +imposed their language on half Europe, and profoundly influenced +the other half. The dialectical, provincial Latin, of +various kinds, spoken by the conquered peoples, became the +Romance speech; and Romance literature was the new literature +which grew up among these peoples from the ninth century +onwards,—or from an earlier time, if the fringe of Celtic +peoples, who kept their language but felt the full influence of +Christianity, be taken into the account. The chief thing to +be noted concerning Romance literature is that it was a Christian +literature, finding its background and inspiration in the ideas +to which the Christian Church gave currency. <!-- page +14--><a name="page14"></a><span class="pagenum">p. 14</span>While +Rome spread her conquests over Europe, at the very heart of her +empire Christianity took root, and by slow process transformed +that empire. During the Middle Ages the Bishops of Rome sat +in the seat of the Roman Emperors. This startling change +possessed Gibbon’s imagination, and is the theme of his +great work. But the whole of Gibbon’s history was +anticipated and condensed by Hobbes in a single +sentence—“If a man considers the original of this +great ecclesiastical dominion, he will easily perceive that the +Papacy is no other than the ghost of the deceased Roman Empire, +sitting crowned upon the grave thereof. For so did the +Papacy start up on a sudden out of the ruins of that heathen +power.”</p> +<p>Here, then, is the answer to a question which at once suggests +itself. How do we get this famous opposition between the +older Latin literature and the literature of those countries +which had inherited or accepted the Latin tradition? Why +did not the Romans hand over their literature and teach it, as +they handed over and taught their law? They did teach it in +<!-- page 15--><a name="page15"></a><span class="pagenum">p. +15</span>their schools; grammar and rhetoric, two of the chief +subjects of a liberal education, were purely literary studies, +based on the work of the literary masters of Rome. Never +was there an education so completely literary as the organized +education of Rome and of her provinces. How came it that +there was any breach between the old and the new?</p> +<p>A question of this kind, involving centuries of history, does +not admit of a perfectly simple answer. It may be very +reasonably maintained that in Rome education killed +literature. A carefully organized, universal system of +education, which takes for its material the work of great poets +and orators, is certain to breed a whole army of slaves. +The teachers, employed by the machine to expound ideas not their +own, soon erect systems of pedantic dogma, under which the living +part of literature is buried. The experience of ancient +Rome is being repeated in the England of to-day. The +officials responsible for education, whatever they may uneasily +pretend, are forced by the necessities of their work to encourage +uniformity, and national education becomes a warehouse of <!-- +page 16--><a name="page16"></a><span class="pagenum">p. +16</span>second-hand goods, presided over by men who cheerfully +explain the mind of Burke or of Shakespeare, adjusting the place +of each, and balancing faults against merits. But Roman +education throughout the Empire had further difficulties to +encounter. To understand these it must be remembered what +Latin literature was. The Latins, when we first discern +them in the dim light of the past, were a small, strenuous, +political people, with a passion for government and war. +They first subdued Italy, and no very serious culture-problem +resulted from that conquest. The Etruscans certainly +contributed much to Latin civilization, but their separate +history is lost. No one knows what the Etruscans +thought. The Romans do not seem to have cared. They +welded Italy together, and thereafter came into contact with the +older, richer civilizations of the Mediterranean shores. +The chief of these, in its influence, was the Greek civilization, +as it had developed in that famous group of free city states, +fostered by the sun and air, and addicted to life. In +Athens, at the time of her glory, life was not a habit, but an +experiment. Even <!-- page 17--><a name="page17"></a><span +class="pagenum">p. 17</span>the conservative Romans were +infected. They fell under the sway of Greek thought. +When a practical man of business becomes intimate with an artist, +he is never the same man again. The thought of that +disinterested mode of life haunts his dreams. So Rome, +though she had paid little regard to the other ancient peoples +with whom she had had traffic and war, put herself to school to +the Greeks. She accepted the Greek pantheon, renamed the +Greek gods and goddesses, and translated and adopted Greek +culture. The real Roman religion was a religion of the +homestead, simple, pious, domestic, but they now added foreign +ornaments. So also with literature; their own native +literature was scanty and practical—laws and rustic +proverbs—but they set themselves to produce a new +literature, modelled on the Greek. Virgil followed Homer; +Plautus copied Menander; and Roman literature took on that +secondary and reminiscent character which it never lost. It +was a literature of culture, not of creed. This people had +so practical a genius that they could put the world in harness; +for the decoration of the world they were willing to depend on +foreign loans.</p> +<p><!-- page 18--><a name="page18"></a><span class="pagenum">p. +18</span>In so far as Latin literature was founded on the Greek, +that is, in so far as it was a derivative and imitative +literature, it was not very fit for missionary purposes. +One people can give to another only what is its own. The +Greek gods were useless for export. An example may be taken +from the English rule in India. We can give to the peoples +of India our own representative institutions. We can give +them our own authors, Shakespeare, Burke, Macaulay. But we +cannot give them Homer and Virgil, who nevertheless continue to +play an appreciable part in training the English mind; and we can +hardly give them Milton, whose subtlest beauties depend on the +niceties of the Latin speech. The trial for Latin +literature came when obscurely, in the purlieus and kennels of +Rome, like a hidden fermentation, Christianity arose. The +earliest Christians were for the most part illiterate; but when +at last Christianity reached the high places of the government, +and controlled the Empire, a problem of enormous difficulty +presented itself for solution. The whole elaborate +educational system of the Romans was founded <!-- page 19--><a +name="page19"></a><span class="pagenum">p. 19</span>on the older +literature and the older creeds. All education, law, and +culture were pagan. How could the Christians be educated; +and how, unless they were educated, could they appeal to the +minds of educated men? So began a long struggle, which +continued for many centuries, and swayed this way and that. +Was Christianity to be founded barely on the Gospel precepts and +on a way of life, or was it to seek to subdue the world by +yielding to it? This, the religious problem, is the chief +educational problem in recorded history. There were the +usual parties; and the fiercest, on both sides, counselled no +surrender. Tertullian, careful for the purity of the new +religion, held it an unlawful thing for Christians to become +teachers in the Roman schools. Later, in the reign of +Julian the Apostate, an edict forbade Christians to teach in the +schools, but this time for another reason, lest they should draw +away the youth from the older faith. In the end the result +was a practical compromise, arranged by certain ecclesiastical +politicians, themselves lovers of letters, between the old world +and the new. It was agreed, in effect, that the schools +<!-- page 20--><a name="page20"></a><span class="pagenum">p. +20</span>should teach humane letters and mythology, leaving it to +the Church to teach divine doctrine and the conduct of +life. All later history bears the marks of this +compromise. Here was the beginning of that distinction and +apportionment between the secular and the sacred which is so much +more conspicuous in Christian communities than ever it has been +among the followers of other religions. Here also was the +beginning of that strange mixture, familiar to all students of +literature, whereby the Bible and Virgil are quoted as equal +authorities, Plato is set over against St. Paul, the Sibyl +confirms the words of David, and, when a youth of promise, +destined for the Church, is drowned, St. Peter and a river-god +are the chief mourners at his poetic obsequies. This +mixture is not a fantasy of the Renaissance; it has been part and +parcel, from the earliest times, of the tradition of the +Christian church.</p> +<p>History is larger than morality; and a wise man will not +attempt to pass judgment on those who found themselves in so +unparalleled a position. A new religion, claiming an +authority not of this world, prevailed in this world, <!-- page +21--><a name="page21"></a><span class="pagenum">p. 21</span>and +was confronted with all the resources of civilization, +inextricably entangled with the ancient pagan faiths. What +was to be done? The Gospel precepts seemed to admit of no +transaction. “They that say such things declare +plainly that they seek a country. And truly, if they had +been mindful of that country from whence they came out, they +might have had opportunity to have returned. But now they +desire a better country, that is an heavenly.” The +material prosperity and social order which Law and Politics take +such pains to preserve and increase are no part of their +care. They are strangers and pilgrims in the country where +they pitch their tent for a night. How dare they spend time +on cherishing the painted veil called Life, when their desires +are fixed on what it conceals? When Tacitus called the +Christian religion “a deadly superstition,” he spoke +as a true Roman, a member of the race of Empire-builders. +His subtle political instinct scented danger from those who +looked with coldness on the business and desire of this +world. The Christian faith, which presents no social +difficulties while it is professed <!-- page 22--><a +name="page22"></a><span class="pagenum">p. 22</span>here and +there by a lonely saint or seer, is another thing when it becomes +the formal creed of a nation. The Christians themselves +knew that to cut themselves off from the country of their birth +would have been a fatal choice, so far as this world is +concerned. Their ultimate decision was to accept Roman +civilization and Roman culture, and to add Christianity to +it.</p> +<p>Then followed an age-long attempt to Christianize Latin +literature, to supply believers with a new poetry, written in +polished and accomplished verse, and inspired by Christian +doctrine. Of those who attempted this task, Prudentius is +perhaps the greatest name. The attempt could never have +been very successful; those who write in Latin verse must submit +to be judged, not by the truth of their teaching, but by the +formal beauties of their prosody, and the wealth of their +allusive learning. Even Milton, zealot though he be, is +esteemed for his manner rather than for his matter. But the +experiment was cut short by the barbarian invasions. When +the Empire was invaded, St. Jerome and St. Augustine, Prudentius +and <!-- page 23--><a name="page23"></a><span class="pagenum">p. +23</span>Symmachus, Claudian and Paulinus of Nola, were all +alive. These men, in varying degrees, had compounded and +blended the two elements, the pagan and the Christian. The +two have been compounded ever since. The famous sevententh +century controversy concerning the fitness of sacred subjects for +poetic treatment is but a repetition and an echo of that older +and more vital difference. The two strains could never be +perfectly reconciled, so that a certain impurity and confusion +was bequeathed to modern European literature, not least to +English literature. Ours is a great and various literature, +but its rarest virtue is simplicity. Our best ballads and +lyrics are filled with the matter of faith, but as often as we +try the larger kinds of poetry, we inevitably pass over into +reminiscence, learning, criticism,—in a word, culture.</p> +<p>The barbarians seized, or were granted, land; and settled down +under their chiefs. They accepted Christianity, and made it +into a warlike religion. They learned and +“corrupted” the Latin language. In their +dialects they had access neither to the literature of ancient +Rome, <!-- page 24--><a name="page24"></a><span +class="pagenum">p. 24</span>nor to the imitative scholarly +Christian literature, poetry and homily, which competed with +it. Latin continued to be the language of religion and +law. It was full of terms and allusions which meant nothing +to them. They knew something of government,—not of +the old republic, but of their own men and estates. They +believed wholly and simply in Christianity, especially the +miraculous part of it. To them (as to all whom it has most +profoundly influenced) it was not a philosophy, but a history of +marvellous events. When, by the operation of society, their +dialect had formed itself, a new literature, unlike anything that +had flourished in ancient Rome, grew up among them. This +was Romance, the great literary form of the Middle Ages. It +was a sincere literature, expressive of their pride in arms and +their simple religious faith. The early songs and ballads, +chanted in the Romance speech, have all perished. From a +later time there have come down to us the <i>Chansons de +Geste</i>, narrative poems composed by the professional caste of +poets to celebrate the deeds and adventures of the knights who +fought the battles of Charlemagne against the Saracen +invader.</p> +<p><!-- page 25--><a name="page25"></a><span class="pagenum">p. +25</span>The note of this Romance literature is that it was +actual, modern, realistic, at a time when classical literature +had become a remote convention of bookish culture. It was +sung in the banqueting-hall, while Latin poetry was read in the +cells of monks. It flourished enormously, and extended +itself to all the matter of history and legend, to King Arthur, +Theseus, Alexander, ancient heroes and warriors who were brought +alive again in the likeness of knights and emperors. Its +triumph was so complete, that its decadence followed +swiftly. Like the creatures that live in the blood of man, +literary forms and species commonly die of their own +excess. Romances were multiplied, and imitated; +professional poets, not content with marvels that had now become +familiar, sought for a new sensation in extravagant language and +incident. The tales became more and more sophisticated, +elaborate, grotesque, and unreal, until, in the fourteenth +century, a stout townsman, who ticketed bales in a custom-house, +and was the best English poet of his time, found them +ridiculous. In <i>Sir Thopas</i> Chaucer parodies the +popular literature of his <!-- page 26--><a +name="page26"></a><span class="pagenum">p. 26</span>day. +Sir Thopas is a great reader of romances; he models himself on +the heroes whose deeds possess his imagination, and scours the +English countryside, seeking in vain for the fulfilment of his +dreams of prowess.</p> +<p>So Romance declined; and by the end of the seventeenth century +the fashion is completely reversed; the pendulum has swung back; +now it is the literature inspired by the old classical models +that is real, and handles actual human interests, while Romantic +literature has become remote, fictitious, artificial. This +does not mean that the men of the later seventeenth century +believed in the gods and Achilles, but not in the saints and +Arthur. It means that classical literature was found best +to imitate for its form. The greater classical writers had +described the life of man, as they saw it, in direct and simple +language, carefully ordered by art. After a long +apprenticeship of translation and imitation, modern writers +adopted the old forms, and filled them with modern matter. +The old mythology, when it was kept, was used allegorically and +allusively. Common-sense, pointedly expressed, with some +<!-- page 27--><a name="page27"></a><span class="pagenum">p. +27</span>traditional ornament and fable, became the matter of +poetry.</p> +<p>A rough summary of this kind is enough to show how large a +question is involved in the history of Romance. All +literary history is a long record of the struggle between those +two rival teachers of man—books, and the experience of +life. Good books describe the world, and teach whole +generations to interpret the world. Because they throw +light on the life of man, they enjoy a vast esteem, and are set +up in a position of authority. Then they generate other +books; and literature, receding further and further from the +source of truth, becomes bookish and conventional, until those +who have been taught to see nature through the spectacles of +books grow uneasy, and throw away the distorting glasses, to look +at nature afresh with the naked eye. They also write books, +it may be, and attract a crowd of imitators, who produce a +literature no less servile than the literature it supplants.</p> +<p>This movement of the sincere and independent human mind is +found in the great writers of all periods, and is called the +Return to Nature. <!-- page 28--><a name="page28"></a><span +class="pagenum">p. 28</span>It is seen in Pope no less than in +Wordsworth; in <i>The Rape of the Lock</i> no less than in +<i>Peter Bell</i>. Indeed the whole history of the +mock-heroic, and the work of Tassoni, Boileau, and Pope, the +three chief masters in that kind, was a reassertion of sincerity +and nature against the stilted conventions of the late literary +epic. The <i>Iliad</i> is the story of a quarrel. +What do men really quarrel about? Is there any more +distinctive mark of human quarrels than the eternal triviality of +the immediate cause? The insulting removal of a memorial +emblem from an Italian city; the shifting of a reading-desk from +one position to another in a French church; the playful theft of +a lock of hair by an amorous young English nobleman—these +were enough, in point of fact, to set whole communities by the +ears, and these are the events celebrated in <i>The Rape of the +Bucket</i>, <i>The Rape of the Lectern</i>, <i>The Rape of the +Lock</i>. How foolish it is to suppose that nature and +truth are to be found in one school of poetry to the exclusion of +another! The eternal virtues of literature are sincerity, +clarity, breadth, force, and subtlety. They are to <!-- +page 29--><a name="page29"></a><span class="pagenum">p. +29</span>be found, in diverse combinations, now here and now +there. While the late Latin Christian poets were bound over +to Latin models—to elegant reminiscences of a faded +mythology and the tricks of a professional rhetoric—there +arose a new school, intent on making literature real and +modern. These were the Romance poets. If they +pictured Theseus as a duke, and Jason as a wandering knight, it +was because they thought of them as live men, and took means to +make them live for the reader or listener. The realism of +the early literature of the Middle Ages is perhaps best seen in +old Irish. The monk bewails the lawlessness of his +wandering thoughts, which run after dreams of beauty and pleasure +during the hour of divine service. The hermit in the wood +describes, with loving minuteness, the contents of his +larder. Never was there a fresher or more spontaneous +poetry than the poetry of this early Christian people. But +it is not in the direct line of descent, for it was written in +the Celtic speech of a people who did not achieve the government +of Europe. The French romances inherited the throne, and +passed through all the stages of <!-- page 30--><a +name="page30"></a><span class="pagenum">p. 30</span>elaboration +and decadence. They too, in their turn, became a +professional rhetoric, false and tedious. When they ceased +to be a true picture of life, they continued in esteem as a +school of manners and deportment for the fantastic gallantry of a +court. Yet through them all their Christian origin +shines. Their very themes bear witness to the teaching of +Christian asceticism and Christian idealism. The quest of a +lady never seen; the temptations that present themselves to a +wandering knight under the disguise of beauty and +ease;—these, and many other familiar romantic plots borrow +their inspiration from the same source. Not a few of the +old fairy stories, preserved in folk-lore, are full of religious +meaning—they are the Christian literature of the Dark +Ages. Nor is it hard to discern the Christian origins of +later Romantic poetry. Pope’s morality has little +enough of the religious character:</p> +<blockquote><p>Know then this truth (enough for Man to know),<br +/> +Virtue alone is Happiness below.</p> +</blockquote> +<p>But Coleridge, when he moralizes, speaks the language of +Christianity:</p> +<blockquote><p><!-- page 31--><a name="page31"></a><span +class="pagenum">p. 31</span>He prayeth best, who loveth best<br +/> + All things both great and small;<br /> +For the dear God who loveth us<br /> + He made and loveth all.</p> +</blockquote> +<p>The like contrast holds between Dryden and Shelley. It +is perhaps hardly fair to take an example from Dryden’s +poems on religion; they are rational arguments on difficult +topics, after this fashion:</p> +<blockquote><p>In doubtful questions ’tis the safest way<br +/> +To learn what unsuspected ancients say;<br /> +For ’tis not likely we should higher soar<br /> +In search of heaven than all the church before.</p> +</blockquote> +<p>When Dryden writes in his most fervent and magnificent style, +he writes like this:</p> +<blockquote><p>I will not rake the Dunghill of thy Crimes,<br /> +For who would read thy Life that reads thy rhymes?<br /> +But of King <i>David’s</i> Foes be this the Doom,<br /> +May all be like the Young-man <i>Absalom</i>;<br /> +And for my Foes may this their Blessing be,<br /> +To talk like <i>Doeg</i> and to write like Thee.</p> +</blockquote> +<p>Nor is it fair to bring Shelley’s lame satires into +comparison with these splendors. When Shelley is inspired +by his demon, this is how he writes:</p> +<blockquote><p><!-- page 32--><a name="page32"></a><span +class="pagenum">p. 32</span>To suffer woes which Hope thinks +infinite;<br /> +To forgive wrongs darker than death or night;<br /> + To defy Power which seems omnipotent;<br /> +To love, and bear; to hope till Hope creates<br /> +From its own wreck the thing it contemplates;<br /> + Neither to change, nor falter, nor repent;<br /> +This, like thy glory, Titan, is to be<br /> +Good, great and joyous, beautiful and free;<br /> +This is alone Life, Joy, Empire and Victory.</p> +</blockquote> +<p>Some of the great poets of the Romantic Revival took mediaeval +literature for their model, but they did more than that. +They returned to the cult of wild nature; they reintroduced the +supernatural, which is a part of the nature of man; they +described seas, and deserts, and mountains, and the emotions of +the soul in loneliness. But so soon as it passed out of the +hands of the greater poets, this revived Romance became as +bookish as decadent Classicism, and ran into every kind of +sentimental extravagance. Indeed revived Romance also +became a school of manners, and by making a fashion and a code of +rare emotions, debased the descriptive parts of the +language. A description by any professional reporter of any +Royal wedding is further from the truth to-day <!-- page 33--><a +name="page33"></a><span class="pagenum">p. 33</span>than it was +in the eighteenth century. The average writer is looser and +more unprincipled.</p> +<p>The word Romance supplies no very valuable instrument of +criticism even in regard to the great writers of the early +nineteenth century. Wordsworth, like Defoe, drew straight +from the life. Those who will may call him a +Romantic. He told of adventures—the adventures of the +mind. He did not write of Bacchus, Venus, and Apollo; +neither did he concern himself with Merlin, Tristram, and the +Lady of the Lake. He shunned what is derived from other +books. His theme is man, nature, and human life. +Scott, in rich and careless fashion, dealt in every kind of +material that came his way. He described his own country +and his own people with loving care, and he loved also the +melodrama of historical fiction and supernatural legend. +“His romance and antiquarianism,” says Ruskin, +“his knighthood and monkery, are all false, and he knows +them to be false.” Certainly, <i>The Heart of +Midlothian</i> and <i>The Antiquary</i> are better than +<i>Ivanhoe</i>. Scott’s love for the knighthood and +monkery was real, but it was playful. His heart was with +Fielding.</p> +<p><!-- page 34--><a name="page34"></a><span class="pagenum">p. +34</span>There is nothing inconsistent in the best of the +traditions of the two parties. The Classical school taught +simplicity, directness, and modesty of speech. They are +right: it is the way to tell a ghost story. The Romantic +school taught a wider imaginative outlook and a more curious +analysis of the human mind. They also are right: it is the +way to investigate a case in the police courts. Both were +cumbered, at times, with the dead things that they found in the +books they loved. All literature, except the strongest and +purest, is cumbered with useless matter—the conventional +epithet, the grandiose phrase, the outworn classical quotation, +the self-conscious apology, the time-honored joke. But +there are only two schools of literature—the good, and the +bad. As for national legend, its growth is the same in all +ages. The Greeks told tales of Achilles, the Romans of +Aeneas, the French of Charlemagne, the British of Arthur. +It is a part of the same process, and an expression of the same +humanity.</p> +<p>I have tried to show that the Renaissance bears the same +relation to classical literature as <!-- page 35--><a +name="page35"></a><span class="pagenum">p. 35</span>the Revival +of Romance bears to mediaeval literature, and that the whole +history of the literature of Europe is an oscillation between +Christian and Pagan ideals during that long and wavering process +whereby Christianity was partially established as the creed and +way of life of a group of diverse nations. The historical +meaning of the word Romance is exact and easy to define. +But in common usage the word means something much vaguer than +this. It is a note, an atmosphere, a kind of feeling that +is awakened not only by literature but by the behavior of men and +the disposition of material objects. John Evelyn, the +diarist, enjoys the reputation of having been the first to speak +of a “romantic site,”—a phrase which leads the +way to immeasurable possibilities in the application of the +word. Accuracy in the definition of this larger meaning is +unattainable; and would certainly be false, for the word has +taken its meaning from centuries of usage by inaccurate +thinkers. A whole cluster of feelings, impressions, and +desires, dimly recognized as cognate, has grown around the word, +which has now been a centre of critical discussion <!-- page +36--><a name="page36"></a><span class="pagenum">p. 36</span>and +controversy for the better part of a century. Heine, in his +dissertation on the Romantic School, takes the Christianity of +the Middle Ages as his starting-point, and relates everything to +that. Perhaps he makes too much of allegory and symbolism, +which have always been dear to the church, but are not +conspicuous in early Romance. Yet no one can go far astray +who keeps in touch, as Heine does, with the facts of +history. Goethe, impatient of the wistful intensities of +youth, said that the Classical is health, and the Romantic +disease. Much has been made, by many critics, of the statue +and the picture, as types of ancient and modern art, the one +complete in itself, the other suggesting more than it +portrays. Mr. Walter Pater, borrowing a hint from a +sentence of Bacon, finds the essence of Romance in the addition +of strangeness to beauty, of curiosity to desire. It would +be easy to multiply these epigrammatic statements, which are all +not obscurely related to the fundamental changes wrought on the +world by Christian ideas. No single formula can hope to +describe and distinguish two eras, or define two tempers <!-- +page 37--><a name="page37"></a><span class="pagenum">p. +37</span>of mind. If I had to choose a single +characteristic of Romance as the most noteworthy, I think I +should choose Distance, and should call Romance the magic of +Distance. What is the most romantic line in Virgil? +Surely it is the line which describes the ghosts, staying for +waftage on the banks of the river, and stretching out their hands +in passionate desire to the further shore:</p> +<blockquote><p>Tendebantque manus ripae ulterioris amore.</p> +</blockquote> +<p>Scott expounds the harmonizing power of distance in his +<i>Journal</i>, where he describes the funeral of his friend +Laidlaw’s infant:</p> +<blockquote><p>I saw the poor child’s funeral from a +distance. Ah, that Distance! What a magician for +conjuring up scenes of joy or sorrow, smoothing all asperities, +reconciling all incongruities, veiling all absurdness, softening +every coarseness, doubling every effect by the influence of the +imagination. A Scottish wedding should be seen at a +distance; the gay band of the dancers just distinguished amid the +elderly group of the spectators,—the glass held high, and +the distant cheers as it is swallowed, should be only a sketch, +not a finished Dutch picture, when it becomes brutal and +boorish. Scotch psalmody, too, should be heard from a +distance. The grunt and the snuffle, and the whine and the +scream, should be all blended in that <!-- page 38--><a +name="page38"></a><span class="pagenum">p. 38</span>deep and +distant sound, which rising and falling like the Eolian harp, may +have some title to be called the praise of our Maker. Even +so the distant funeral: the few mourners on horseback with their +plaids wrapped around them—the father heading the +procession as they enter the river, and pointing out the ford by +which his darling is to be carried on the last long +road—not one of the subordinate figures in discord with the +general tone of the incident—seeming just accessories, and +no more—this <i>is</i> affecting.</p> +</blockquote> +<p>The same idea is the subject of T. E. Brown’s poem, +<i>The Schooner</i>:</p> +<blockquote><p> Just mark that schooner westward +far at sea—<br /> +’Tis but an hour ago<br /> +When she was lying hoggish at the quay,<br /> + And men ran to and fro,<br /> +And tugged, and stamped, and shoved, and pushed and swore,<br /> +And ever and anon, with crapulous glee,<br /> +Grinned homage to viragoes on the shore.<br /> +* * * * *<br /> +And now, behold! a shadow of repose<br /> + Upon a line of gray,<br /> +She sleeps, that transverse cuts the evening rose—<br /> + She sleeps, and dreams away,<br /> +Soft blended in a unity of rest<br /> +All jars, and strifes obscene, and turbulent throes,<br /> +’Neath the broad benediction of the West.</p> +</blockquote> +<p><!-- page 39--><a name="page39"></a><span class="pagenum">p. +39</span>Shelley finds the suggestion of distance in beautiful +music:</p> +<blockquote><p> Though the sound overpowers,<br +/> +Sing again, with thy sweet voice revealing<br /> + A tone<br /> + Of some world far from ours,<br /> +Where music and moonlight and feeling<br /> + Are one.</p> +</blockquote> +<p>Wordsworth hears it in the song of the Highland Girl:</p> +<blockquote><p>Will no one tell me what she sings?—<br /> +Perhaps the plaintive numbers flow<br /> +For old, unhappy, far-off things,<br /> + And battles long ago.</p> +</blockquote> +<p>These quotations are enough to show what a width of view is +given to modern Romantic poetry. Man is, in one sense, more +truly seen in a wide setting of the mountains and the sea than +close at hand in the street. But the romantic effect of +distance may delude and conceal as well as glorify and +liberate. The weakness of the modern Romantic poet is that +he must keep himself aloof from life, that he may see it. +He rejects the authority, and many of the pleasures, along with +the duties, of society. He looks out from his window on the +<!-- page 40--><a name="page40"></a><span class="pagenum">p. +40</span>men fighting in the plain, and sees them transfigured +under the rays of the setting sun. He enjoys the battle, +but not as the fighters enjoy it. He nurses himself in all +the luxury of philosophic sensation. He does not help to +bury the child, or to navigate the schooner, or to discover the +Fortunate Islands. The business of every poet, it may be +said, is vision, not action. But the epic poet holds his +reader fast by strong moral bonds of sympathy with the actors in +the poem. “I should have liked to do that” is +what the reader says to himself. He is asked to think and +feel as a man, not as a god.</p> +<p>The weakness of revived Romance found the most searching of +its critics in Tennyson, who was fascinated, when he was shaping +his own poetic career, by the picture and the past, yet could not +feel satisfied with the purely aesthetic attitude of art to +life. In poem after poem he returns to the question, Is +poetry an escape from life? Must it lull the soul in a +selfish security? The struggle that went on in his mind has +left its mark on <i>The Lady of Shalott</i>, <i>The Palace of +Art</i>, <i>The Voyage</i>, <i>The Vision of </i><!-- page +41--><a name="page41"></a><span class="pagenum">p. +41</span><i>Sin</i>, <i>The Lotos-Eaters</i>, and others of his +poems. The Lady of Shalott lives secluded in her bower, +where she weaves a magic web with gay colors. She has heard +that a curse will fall on her if she looks out on the world and +down to the city of Camelot. She sees the outer world only +in a mirror, and</p> +<blockquote><p>In her web she still delights<br /> +To weave the mirror’s magic sights</p> +</blockquote> +<p>—villages, market-girls, knights riding two and two, +funerals, or pairs of lovers wandering by. At last she +grows half-sick of seeing the world only in shadows and +reflections. Then a sudden vivid experience breaks up this +life of dream. Sir Lancelot rides past, in shining armor, +singing as he rides. She leaves her magic web and mirror, +and looks upon the real world.</p> +<blockquote><p>Out flew the web and floated wide;<br /> +The mirror crack’d from side to side;<br /> +“The curse is come upon me,” cried<br /> +The Lady of Shalott.</p> +</blockquote> +<p>She goes into the world, and there she meets her death. +The poem is not an allegory, but there is no mistaking the +thought that generated <!-- page 42--><a name="page42"></a><span +class="pagenum">p. 42</span>it. The mirror and the web are +the emblems of Romantic art. The feelings which stir the +heart to action, which spring to meet the occasion or the object, +are contrasted, in the poem, with the more pensive feelings which +are excited by the sight of the object in a mirror, and the +suggestions of color and design which are to be transferred to +the embroidery. The mirror is a true and subtle +symbol. When Shakespeare treated the same problem, he made +King Richard II, the most romantically minded of all his kings, +call for a mirror. The thing that it is easiest for a man +to see in a mirror is himself; egotism in its many forms, +self-pity, self-cultivation, self-esteem, dogs Romanticism like +its shadow. The desire to be the spectator of your own +life, to see yourself in all kinds of heroic and pathetic +attitudes, is the motive-power of Romantic poetry in many of its +later developments. Yet life must be arrested and falsified +before the desire can be fulfilled. No one has ever seen +himself in a mirror as he is seen by others. He cannot +catch himself looking away, self-forgetful, intent on something +outward; yet only when he <!-- page 43--><a +name="page43"></a><span class="pagenum">p. 43</span>is in these +attitudes does his true character show itself in his face. +Nor, if he could so see himself, would he be a witness of the +truth. The sensation of drowning, or of leading an assault +in war, is very unlike the sentiment which is aroused in the +spectator of either of these adventures. Romanticism, in +its decline, confuses the sentiment with the sensation, and +covets the enjoyment of life on the easy terms of a +by-stander.</p> +<p>These faults and failings of late Romance are far enough +removed from the simple heroism of the death of Roland in the +pass of Roncesvalles. Later Romance is known everywhere by +its derivative, secondary, consciously literary character. +Yet it draws sometimes from the original source of inspiration, +and attains, by devious ways, to poetic glories not inferior to +the old.</p> +<h2><!-- page 44--><a name="page44"></a><span class="pagenum">p. +44</span>IMITATION AND FORGERY</h2> +<p>Romance is a perennial form of modern literature, and has +passed through many phases. No period has been without it, +though the esteem in which it is held has varied a good deal from +age to age. English literature is strong in romance; there +is something in the English temper which makes scepticism +ungrateful to it, and disposes it to treat even dreams +seriously. Chaucer, who laughed at the romantic writers of +his day, yet gave a new lease of life to Romance in <i>Troilus +and Cressida</i> and <i>The Knightes Tale</i>. Many of the +poets of the seventeenth century chose romantic themes for their +most serious work; if Davenant and Chamberlayne and others had +been as successful as they were ambitious, they would have +anticipated the Revival of Romance. Even in the age of +Pope, the old romance subjects were still popular, though <!-- +page 45--><a name="page45"></a><span class="pagenum">p. +45</span>they were celebrated in books which have long been +forgotten. Everyone who has studied the Troy legend of the +Middle Ages knows how great a share in the popularization of the +legend belongs to the Sicilian lawyer, Guido delle Colonne, who +summarized, in the dull style of a Latin chronicle, and without +acknowledgment, the brilliant <i>Roman de Troie</i> which the +French poet, Benoît de Sainte-More had written for Queen +Eleanor of England. Guide’s matter-of-fact +compilation had an enormous vogue; Chaucer, Lydgate, and +Shakespeare treated it as an authority; and Caxton translated it +into English prose. Through all the changes of fashion +Caxton’s version continued in esteem; it was repeatedly +revised and reissued; and, in the very age of Pope, found what +was doubtless a large public under the title <i>The Destruction +of Troy</i>, <i>In Three Books . . . With many Admirable Acts of +Chivalry and Martial Prowess</i>, <i>effected by Valiant +Knights</i>, <i>in the Defence and Love of distressed +Ladies. The Thirteenth Edition</i>, <i>Corrected and much +Amended</i>. London, <i>Printed for Eben. Tracey</i>, <i>at +the Three Bibles </i><!-- page 46--><a name="page46"></a><span +class="pagenum">p. 46</span><i>on London-Bridge</i>. +<i>1708</i>. In the underworld of literature Romance never +died out. The Revival of Romance took its special character +from a gradual and powerful reaction against Dryden and Pope and +all those masters of Classical method who, during half a century, +had legislated for English poetry. It began very early in +the eighteenth century, long before the death of Pope. No +sooner did a dynasty of moralists and satirists claim possession +of the high places, and speak in the name of English literature, +than all the other interests and kinds, which survived among the +people, began to range themselves in opposition, and to assert +their right to be heard. The supremacy of Dryden and Pope +was the most despotic rule that English poetry has ever known, +and the revolt was strong in proportion. Satire and +morality very easily becomes tedious, especially when they are in +close alliance. Despotism may be tempered by epigrams, and +so become tolerable, but it is important that the epigrams should +not be made by the despot. Outside the charmed circle of +his friendships, Pope was ready enough to use his wit against any +pretender.</p> +<p><!-- page 47--><a name="page47"></a><span class="pagenum">p. +47</span>The change began gradually, and in very innocent +fashion. Poetry had been taught to be scholarly, +self-conscious, experimental; and it showed its skill in +half-playful imitations of the older English masters. Pope +himself imitated Chaucer and Spenser in burlesque fashion. +John Philips, in <i>The Splendid Shilling</i>, used +Milton’s heightened style to describe the distresses of an +impecunious poet. William Shenstone in <i>The +School-mistress</i>, parodied Spenser, yet the parody is in no +way hostile, and betrays an almost sentimental admiration. +Spenser, like Milton, never lost credit as a master, though his +fame was obscured a little during the reign of Dryden. His +style, it must be remembered, was archaic in his own time; it +could not grow old, for it had never been young. Addison, +in <i>An Account of the Greatest English Poets</i>, says that +Spenser’s verse</p> +<blockquote><p>Can charm an understanding age no more;<br /> +The long-spun allegories fulsome grow,<br /> +While the dull moral lies too plain below.</p> +</blockquote> +<p>But the <i>Account</i> is a merely juvenile work; its dogma is +not the sword of judgment, but <!-- page 48--><a +name="page48"></a><span class="pagenum">p. 48</span>the shield of +ignorance. “The character he gives of Spenser,” +said Pope, “is false; and I have heard him say that he +never read Spenser till fifteen years after he wrote +it.” As for Pope himself, among the English poets +Waller, Spenser, and Dryden were his childhood’s favorites, +in that order; and the year before his death he said to +Spence—“I don’t know how it is; there is +something in Spenser that pleases one as strongly in one’s +old age as it did in one’s youth. I read the Faerie +Queene, when I was about twelve, with infinite delight; and I +think it gave me as much when I read it over, about a year or two +ago.”</p> +<p>The lyrical Milton and the romantic Spenser found disciples +among poets in the early half of the eighteenth century. +Two of these disciples may be mentioned, both born about the year +1700, only twelve years later than Pope. John Dyer, the son +of a solicitor in Wales, was bred to the law, but gave it up to +study painting under Jonathan Richardson. His earlier and +better poems were written while he wandered about South Wales in +pursuit of his art. <i>Grongar Hill</i>, the most <!-- page +49--><a name="page49"></a><span class="pagenum">p. +49</span>notable of them, was published in 1726. Love of +the country is what inspires his verses, which have a very +winning simplicity, only touched here and there by the +conventions deemed proper for poetry:</p> +<blockquote><p>Grass and flowers Quiet treads,<br /> +On the meads and mountain-heads,<br /> +Along with Pleasure, close ally’d,<br /> +Ever by each other’s side;<br /> +And often, by the murmuring rill,<br /> +Hears the thrush, while all is still,<br /> +Within the groves of Grongar Hill.</p> +</blockquote> +<p>The truth of his observation endeared him to Wordsworth; and +his moral, when he finds a moral, is without violence:</p> +<blockquote><p>How close and small the hedges lie!<br /> +What streaks of meadows cross the eye!<br /> +A step methinks may pass the stream,<br /> +So little distant dangers seem;<br /> +So we mistake the Future’s face,<br /> +Ey’d thro’ Hope’s deluding glass;<br /> +As yon summits soft and fair,<br /> +Clad in colours of the air,<br /> +Which, to those who journey near,<br /> +Barren, and brown, and rough appear,<br /> +Still we tread tir’d the same coarse way,<br /> +The present’s still a cloudy day.</p> +</blockquote> +<p><!-- page 50--><a name="page50"></a><span class="pagenum">p. +50</span>It takes a good poet to strike a clear note, with no +indecision, in the opening lines of his poem, as Dyer does in +<i>The Country Walk</i>:</p> +<blockquote><p>I am resolv’d, this charming day,<br /> +In the open fields to stray;<br /> +And have no roof above my head<br /> +But that whereon the Gods do tread.</p> +</blockquote> +<p>His landscapes are delicately etched, and are loved for their +own sake:</p> +<blockquote><p>And there behold a bloomy mead,<br /> +A silver stream, a willow shade,<br /> +Beneath the shade a fisher stand,<br /> +Who, with the angle in his hand,<br /> +Swings the nibbling fry to land.</p> +</blockquote> +<p>It would be absurd to speak solemnly of Dyer’s debt to +Milton; he is an original poet; but the writer of the lines +quoted above can never have been blind to the beauties of +<i>L’Allegro</i> and <i>Il Penseroso</i>. His two +arts brought him little material prosperity; in 1740 he took +orders in the Church of England, and in his later years did harm +to his fame by a long industrial poem called <i>The Fleece</i>, +which has on it none of the dew that glistens on his youthful +verses.</p> +<p><!-- page 51--><a name="page51"></a><span class="pagenum">p. +51</span>James Thomson, who won a great reputation in his own +age, was the son of a parish minister in Scotland. He was +educated in Edinburgh, and came to London to seek his +fortune. All Thomson’s work shows the new tendencies +in poetry struggling with the accepted fashions. His +language in <i>The Seasons</i> is habitually rhetorical and +stilted, yet there is hardly a page without its vignettes of +truth and beauty. When he forgets what he has learned in +the Rhetoric class, and falls back on his own memories and +likings, the poet in him reappears. In <i>The Castle of +Indolence</i>, published just before his death in 1748, he +imitates Spenser. One stanza of this poem is more famous +than all the rest; it is pure and high romance:</p> +<blockquote><p> As when a shepherd of the +Hebrid-Isles,<br /> + Placed far amid the melancholy main,<br /> + (Whether it be lone fancy him beguiles,<br /> + Or that aërial beings sometimes deign<br /> + To stand embodied to our senses plain),<br /> + Sees on the naked hill, or valley low,<br /> + The whilst in ocean Phoebus dips his wain,<br /> + A vast assembly moving to and fro;<br /> +Then all at once in air dissolves the wondrous show.</p> +</blockquote> +<p><!-- page 52--><a name="page52"></a><span class="pagenum">p. +52</span>Many who are familiar with this simile have never been +at the pains to remember, or enquire, what it illustrates. +Indeed its appearance in the poem is almost startling, as if it +were there for no purpose but to prophesy of the coming glories +of English poetry. The visitors to the Castle of Indolence +are met at the gate by the porter, who supplies them with +dressing-gowns and slippers, wherein to take their ease. +They then stroll off to various parts of the spacious grounds, +and their disappearance is the occasion for this wonderful +verse. Thomson cared no more than his readers for the +application of the figure; what possessed him was his memory of +the magic twilight on the west coast of Scotland.</p> +<p>Pope and Prior were metropolitan poets; it is worth noting +that Dyer belonged to Wales, and Thomson to Scotland. It is +even more significant that Dyer was by profession a painter, and +that Thomson’s poems were influenced by memories of the +fashionable school of landscape painting. The development +of Romantic poetry in the eighteenth century is inseparably +associated with pictorial art, and especially with <!-- page +53--><a name="page53"></a><span class="pagenum">p. 53</span>the +rise of landscape painting. Two great masters of the +seventeenth century, Salvator Rosa and Claude Lorrain, are more +important than all the rest. We have here to do not with +the absolute merits of painting, nor with its technical beauties +and subtleties, but with its effect on the popular imagination, +which in this matter does not much differ from the poetic +imagination. The landscapes of Salvator Rosa and Claude +were made familiar to an enormous public by the process of +engraving, and poetry followed where painting led. There +are exquisite landscapes in the backgrounds of the great Italian +masters; Leonardo, Titian, and others; but now the background +became the picture, and the groups of figures were reduced to +serve as incidents in a wider scheme. Exactly the same +change, the same shift of the centre of interest, may be seen in +Thomson’s poetry compared with Spenser’s. No +doubt it would be difficult to balance the creditor and debtor +account as between poetry and painting; the earlier pictorial +landscapes borrowed some hints from the older romances; but in +England, at least, landscapes of wild rocks, <!-- page 54--><a +name="page54"></a><span class="pagenum">p. 54</span>and calm +lakes, and feudal castles lit up by the glow of the setting sun +were familiar before the reaction in poetry set in. +Romance, in its modern development, is largely a question of +background. A romantic love-affair might be defined as a +love-affair in other than domestic surroundings. Who can +use the word “romantic” with more authority than +Coleridge? In <i>Kubla Khan</i>, a poem which some would +choose as the high-water mark of English romantic poetry, he gets +his effect from the description of a landscape combining the +extremes of beauty and terror:</p> +<blockquote><p>But oh! that deep romantic chasm which slanted<br +/> +Down the green hill athwart a cedarn cover!<br /> +A savage place! as holy and enchanted<br /> +As e’er beneath a waning moon was haunted<br /> +By woman wailing for her demon lover!<br /> +And from this chasm, with ceaseless turmoil seething,<br /> +* * * * *<br /> +It flung up momently the sacred river.<br /> +Five miles meandering with a mazy motion<br /> +Through wood and dale the sacred river ran,<br /> +Then reached the caverns measureless to man,<br /> +And sank in tumult to a lifeless ocean;<br /> +And ’mid this tumult Kubla heard from far<br /> +Ancestral voices prophesying war!</p> +</blockquote> +<p><!-- page 55--><a name="page55"></a><span class="pagenum">p. +55</span>Romance demands scenery; and it should never be +forgotten that the age of Pope, the age of symmetry and +correctness in poetry, was an age when the taste for wild scenery +in painting and in gardening was at its height. If the +house was set in order, the garden broke into a wilderness. +Addison in the <i>Spectator</i> (No. 414) praises the new art of +landscape gardening:</p> +<blockquote><p>There is generally in nature something more grand +and august, than what we meet with in the curiosities of +art. When, therefore, we see this imitated in any measure, +it gives us a nobler and more exalted kind of pleasure, than what +we receive from the nicer and more accurate productions of +art. On this account our <i>English</i> gardens are not so +entertaining to the fancy as those in <i>France</i> and +<i>Italy</i>, where we see a larger extent of ground covered over +with an agreeable mixture of garden and forest, which represent +everywhere an artificial wildness, much more charming than that +neatness and elegancy which we meet with in those of our own +country.</p> +</blockquote> +<p>Addison would have hesitated to apply this doctrine to poetry; +indeed the orthodoxy of that age favored the highest possible +contrast between the orderly works of man, and the garden, <!-- +page 56--><a name="page56"></a><span class="pagenum">p. +56</span>which it chose to treat as the outpost of rebellious +nature. Pope was a gardener as well as a poet, and his +gardening was extravagantly romantic. He describes his +ideal garden in the <i>Epistle to the Earl of Burlington</i>:</p> +<blockquote><p>Let not each beauty everywhere be spy’d,<br +/> +Where half the skill is decently to hide.<br /> +He gains all points, who pleasingly confounds,<br /> +Surprises, varies, and conceals the bounds.<br /> +Consult the genius of the place in all;<br /> +That tells the waters or to rise, or fall;<br /> +Or helps th’ ambitious hill the heav’ns to scale,<br +/> +Or scoops in circling theatres the vale;<br /> +Calls in the country, catches opening glades,<br /> +Joins willing woods, and varies shades from shades;<br /> +Now breaks, or now directs, th’ intending lines;<br /> +Paints as you plant, and, as you work, designs.</p> +</blockquote> +<p>Pope carried out these ideas as well as he could in his garden +at Twickenham, where he attempted to compress every variety of +scenic effect within the space of five acres, so that it became a +kind of melodramatic peep-show. The professional +landscape-gardeners worked on a larger scale; the two chief of +them perhaps were Bridgeman, who invented the haha for the +purpose of concealing the bounds; and William <!-- page 57--><a +name="page57"></a><span class="pagenum">p. 57</span>Kent, +Pope’s associate and contemporary, who disarranged old +gardens, and designed illustrations for Spenser’s <i>Faerie +Queene</i>. Kent was an architect and bad painter, much +favored by George I. Lord Chesterfield compares him to +Apelles, who alone was permitted to paint the portrait of +Alexander:</p> +<blockquote><p>Equal your varied wonders! save<br /> + This difference we see,<br /> +One would no other painter have—<br /> + No other would have thee.</p> +</blockquote> +<p>From 1716 onward he was much employed by the Earl of +Burlington. He helped to lay out Stowe, in Buckinghamshire, +with a fresh and surprising view at every turn; the wandering +visitor was introduced, among other delights, to the Hermitage, +the Temple of Venus, the Egyptian pyramid, St. Augustine’s +cave (artfully constructed of roots and moss), the Saxon Temple, +the Temple of Bacchus, and Dido’s cave. The craze for +romantic gardening, with its illusions of distance, and its ruins +and groves, persisted throughout the eighteenth century. +Shenstone’s garden at The Leasowes enjoyed a higher +reputation even than his <!-- page 58--><a +name="page58"></a><span class="pagenum">p. 58</span>poetry, and +it is well known how he strained his slender means in the effort +to outshine his neighbors. “In time,” says +Johnson, “his expenses brought clamours about him that +overpowered the lamb’s bleat and the linnet’s song; +and his groves were haunted by beings very different from fauns +and fairies.”</p> +<p>The chief of Kent’s successors was Launcelot Brown, +commonly called “Capability Brown” from his habit of +murmuring to himself, as he gazed on a tract of land submitted +for his diagnosis—“It has capabilities; it has +capabilities.” He laid out Kew and Blenheim. +Gazing one day on one of his own made rivers, he exclaimed, with +an artist’s rapture,—“Thames! +Thames! Thou wilt never forgive me.” He +certainly imposed himself upon his own time, and, so far, was a +great man. “Mr. Brown,” said Richard Owen +Cambridge, “I very earnestly wish that I may die before +you.” “Why so?” said Brown with some +surprise. “Because,” said he, “I should +like to see Heaven before you had improved it.” Among +the romantic writers who were bitten by the mania for picturesque +improvement were Horace <!-- page 59--><a name="page59"></a><span +class="pagenum">p. 59</span>Walpole and even Sir Walter +Scott. Everyone knows how Walpole bought from Mrs. +Chevenix, the toy-shop woman, a little house called +“Chopp’d Straw Hall” which he converted into +the baronial splendors of Strawberry Hill; and how Scott +transmitted a mean Tweedside farm, called Clarty Hole, into the +less pretentious glories of Abbotsford.</p> +<p>After the practice came the theory. The painters and +landscape-gardeners were followed by a school of philosophers, +who expounded Taste and the laws of the Picturesque. Some +extracts from the work of one of these, Thomas Whately, whose +<i>Observations on Modern Gardening</i> appeared in 1770, will +show to what excesses the whole nonsensical business had been +carried. “In wild and romantic scenes,” says +Whately, “may be introduced a ruined stone bridge, of which +some arches may be still standing, and the loss of those which +are fallen may be supplied by a few planks, with a rail, thrown +over the vacancy. It is a picturesque object: it suits the +situation; and the antiquity of the passage, the care taken to +keep it still open, though the original building <!-- page +60--><a name="page60"></a><span class="pagenum">p. 60</span>is +decayed, the apparent necessity which thence results for a +communication, give it an imposing air of reality.” +The context of this passages shows that the bridge leads +nowhither. On the management of rocks Whately is a +connoisseur. “Their most distinguished +characters,” he says, “are <i>dignity</i>, +<i>terror</i>, and <i>fancy</i>: the expressions of all are +constantly wild; and sometimes a rocky scene is only wild, +without pretensions to any particular character.” But +ruins are what he likes best, and he recommends that they shall +be constructed on the model of Tintern Abbey. They must be +obvious ruins, much dilapidated, or the visitors will examine +them too closely. “An appendage evidently more modern +than the principal structure will sometimes corroborate the +effect; the shed of a cottager amidst the remains of a temple, is +a contrast both to the former and the present state of the +building.” It seems almost impossible that this +should have been offered as serious advice; but it was the +admired usage of the time. Whately’s book was a +recognized authority, and ran through several editions. He +is also known as a Shakespeare critic, of no particular mark.</p> +<p><!-- page 61--><a name="page61"></a><span class="pagenum">p. +61</span>A more influential writer than Whately was William +Gilpin, an industrious clergyman and schoolmaster, who spent his +holidays wandering and sketching in the most approved parts of +England, Wales and Scotland. His books on the Picturesque +were long held in esteem. The earliest of them was entitled +<i>Observations on the River Wye and several parts of South Wales +. . . relative chiefly to picturesque beauty</i> (1782). +Others, which followed in steady succession, rendered a like +service to the Lake district, the Highlands of Scotland, the New +Forest, and the Isle of Wight. Those books taught the +aesthetic appreciation of wild nature to a whole +generation. It is a testimony to their influence that for a +time they enslaved the youth of Wordsworth. In <i>The +Prelude</i> he tells how, in early life, he misunderstood the +teaching of Nature, not from insensibility, but from the +presumption which applied to the impassioned life of Nature the +“rules of mimic art.” He calls this habit +“a strong infection of the age,” and tells how he +too, for a time, was wont to compare scene with scene, and to +pamper himself “with meagre novelties of <!-- page 62--><a +name="page62"></a><span class="pagenum">p. 62</span>colour and +proportion.” In another passage he speaks of similar +melodramatic errors, from conformity to book-notions, in his +early study of poetry.</p> +<blockquote><p>The dignities of plain occurrence then<br /> +Were tasteless, and truth’s golden mean, a point,<br /> +Where no sufficient pleasure could be found.</p> +</blockquote> +<p>But imaginative power, and the humility which had been his in +childhood, returned to him—</p> +<blockquote><p> I shook the habit off<br /> +Entirely and for ever.</p> +</blockquote> +<p>Yet in one curious respect Gilpin’s amateur teaching did +leave its mark on the history of English poetry. When +Wordsworth and Coleridge chose the Wye and Tintern Abbey for +their walking tour, they were probably determined in that +direction by the fame of the scenery; and when they and Southey +settled in the Lake district, it may be surmised that they felt +other and stronger attractions than those that came from +Wordsworth’s early associations with the place. The +Wye, Tintern Abbey, the English Lakes, the Scottish +Highlands—these were the favored places of the <!-- page +63--><a name="page63"></a><span class="pagenum">p. +63</span>apostles of the picturesque, and have now become +memorial places in our poetic history.</p> +<p>All these gardeners and aesthetic critics who busied +themselves with wild nature were aiming at an ideal which had +been expressed in many painted landscapes, and had been held up +as the top of admiration by one of the greatest English +poets. The influence of Milton on the new landscape +interest must be held to be not less than the influence of his +contemporaries, Salvator Rosa and Claude. His descriptions +of Paradise did more than any painting to alter the whole +practice of gardening. They are often appealed to, even by +the technical gardeners. In garden-lore Milton was a +convinced Romantic. He has two descriptions of the Garden +of Eden; the slighter of the two occurs on the occasion of +Raphael’s entry, and merely resumes the earlier and fuller +account:</p> +<blockquote><p>Their glittering tents they passed, and now is +come<br /> +Into the blissful field, through Groves of Myrrhe,<br /> +And flowering Odours, Cassia, Nard, and Balme;<br /> +A Wilderness of Sweets; for Nature here<br /> +Wantoned as in her prime and plaid at will<br /> +Her Virgin Fancies, pouring forth more sweet,<br /> +Wilde above rule or art; enormous bliss.</p> +</blockquote> +<p><!-- page 64--><a name="page64"></a><span class="pagenum">p. +64</span>Coleridge has some remarks, in his <i>Table Talk</i>, on +Milton’s disregard of painting. There are only two +pictures, he says, in Milton; Adam bending over the sleeping Eve, +and the entrance of Dalilah, like a ship under full sail. +Certainly the above lines are no picture; but they are more +exciting than any clear delineation could be; they are full of +scent, and air, and the emotions of ease and bliss. The +other passage has more of architectural quality in it, and +describes what first met Satan’s gaze, when he entered the +Garden and sat, perched like a cormorant, upon the Tree of +Life.</p> +<blockquote><p> The crisped +Brooks<br /> +With mazie error under pendant shades<br /> +Ran Nectar, visiting each plant, and fed<br /> +Flours worthy of Paradise which not nice Art<br /> +In Beds and curious Knots, but Nature boon<br /> +Poured forth profuse on Hill and Dale and Plaine<br /> +Both where the morning sun first warmly smote<br /> +The open field, and where the unpierc’t shade<br /> +Imbround the noontide Bowers: Thus was this place,<br /> +A happy rural seat of various view:<br /> +Groves whose rich Trees wept odorous Gumms and Balme,<br /> +Others whose fruit burnisht with Golden Rinde<br /> +Hung amiable, <i>Hesperian</i> Fables true,<br /> +<!-- page 65--><a name="page65"></a><span class="pagenum">p. +65</span>If true, here onely, and of delicious taste:<br /> +Betwixt the Lawns, or level Downs, and Flocks<br /> +Grasing the tender herb, were interpos’d,<br /> +Or palmie hilloc, or the flourie lap<br /> +Of some irriguous Valley spread her store,<br /> +Flours of all hue, and without Thorn the Rose:<br /> +Another side, umbrageous Grots and Caves<br /> +Of coole recess, o’er which the mantling Vine<br /> +Layes forth her purple Grape, and gently creeps<br /> +Luxuriant; mean while murmuring waters fall<br /> +Down the slope hills, disperst, or in a Lake,<br /> +That to the fringed Bank with Myrtle crown’d,<br /> +Her chrystall mirror holds, unite their streams.<br /> +The Birds their quire apply; aires, vernal aires,<br /> +Breathing the smell of field and grove, attune<br /> +The trembling leaves, while Universal <i>Pan</i><br /> +Knit with the <i>Graces</i> and the <i>Hours</i> in dance<br /> +Led on th’ Eternal Spring.</p> +</blockquote> +<p>Here is all the variety of hill and valley, wood and lawn, +rock and meadow, waterfall and lake, rose and vine, which the +landscape artists also loved to depict, and which, together with +ruined temples and castles, unknown in Paradise, became the +cherished ideal of landscape gardening. By the influence of +<i>Paradise Lost</i> upon the gardeners, no less than by the +influence of <i>L’Allegro</i> and <i>Il Penseroso</i> upon +the poets, Milton may claim to be regarded as <!-- page 66--><a +name="page66"></a><span class="pagenum">p. 66</span>one of the +forefathers of the Romantic Revival. There is no need to +distinguish carefully between poetry and painting in discussing +their contributions to Romance. A great outcry was raised, +in the last age, against literary criticism of pictures. +But in this question we are concerned with this effect of +pictures on the normal imagination, which is literary, which +cares for story, and suggested action, and the whole chain of +memories and desires that a picture may set in motion. Do +not most of those who look at a romantic landscape imagine +themselves wandering among the scenes that are portrayed? +And are not men prone to admire in Nature what they have been +taught by Art to notice? The landscape art of the +seventeenth and eighteenth centuries taught them to imagine +themselves in lonely scenes, among old ruins or frowning rocks, +by the light of sunrise or sunset, cast on gleaming lakes. +These were the theatre of Romance; and the emotions awakened by +scenes like these played an enormous part in the Revival. +It was thus that poets were educated to find that exaltation in +the terrors of mountainous regions which <!-- page 67--><a +name="page67"></a><span class="pagenum">p. 67</span>Gray +expressed when he said: “Not a precipice, not a torrent, +not a cliff, but is pregnant with religion and poetry.”</p> +<p>The weaker side of modern Romance, the play-acting and +pretence that has always accompanied it, may be seen in the +gardening mania. It was not enough to be a country +gentleman; the position must be improved by the added elegances +of a hermit’s cell and an Egyptian pyramid. It is +like children’s play; the day is long, the affairs of our +elders are tedious, we are tired of a life in which there is no +danger and no hunger; let us pretend that we are monks, or +ancient Romans. The mature imagination interprets the +facts; this kind of imagination escapes from the facts into a +world of make-believe, where the tyranny and cause and effect is +no longer felt. It is not a hard word to call it childish; +the imagination of these early Romantics had a child’s +weakness and a child’s delightful confidence and zest.</p> +<p>The same play activity expressed itself in literature, where +an orgy of imitation ushered in the real movement. The +antiquarian beginnings of Romantic poetry may be well illustrated +<!-- page 68--><a name="page68"></a><span class="pagenum">p. +68</span>by the life and works of Thomas Warton. He passed +his life as a resident Fellow of Trinity College, Oxford, and +devoted his leisure, which was considerable, to the study of +English poetry and Gothic architecture. He was not yet +thirty when, in 1757, he was elected Professor of Poetry, a post +which he held for ten years. During this time he planned a +complete History of English Poetry, a task which Pope and Gray in +turn had contemplated and abandoned. The historical +interest which is so conspicuous in early Romanticism owed not a +little, it may be remarked in passing, to the initiative of Pope, +who must therefore be given a place in any full genealogy of the +Romantic family. Warton’s <i>History</i>, so far as +it was completed, was published between 1774 and 1781, when he +relaxed his efforts, and took up lesser tasks. In 1785 he +was made Poet Laureate on the strength of his early poems and +later scholarship. He died in 1790.</p> +<p>Warton’s poems are a curious study. Spenser and +Milton are his masters, and he is a docile pupil. His +poetry is all derivative, and might be best described as +imitation poetry. Christopher <!-- page 69--><a +name="page69"></a><span class="pagenum">p. 69</span>North said of +him that “the gods had made him poetical, but not a +poet,” a saying which contains the whole truth. He +puts together a mosaic of phrases borrowed from his teachers, and +frames them in a sentimental setting of his own. Here are +some passages from <i>The Pleasures of Melancholy</i>, which, +though he wrote it at the age of seventeen, does not differ in +method or inspiration from the rest of his poetical work:</p> +<blockquote><p>Beneath yon ruin’d abbey’s moss-grown +piles<br /> +Oft let me sit, at twilight hour of eve,<br /> +Where thro’ some western window the pale moon<br /> +Pours her long-levell’d rule of streaming light;<br /> +While sullen sacred silence reigns around,<br /> +Save the lone screech-owl’s note, who builds his +bow’r<br /> +Amid the mould’ring caverns dark and damp,<br /> +Or the calm breeze, that rustles in the leaves<br /> +Of flaunting ivy, that with mantle green<br /> +Invests some wasted tow’r. . . .<br /> +Then, when the sullen shades of ev’ning close,<br /> +Where thro’ the room a blindly-glimm’ring gleam<br /> +The dying embers scatter, far remote<br /> +From Mirth’s mad shouts, that thro’ th’ +illumin’d roof<br /> +Resound with festive echo, let me sit,<br /> +Blest with the lowly cricket’s drowsy dirge. . . .<br /> +O come then, Melancholy, queen of thought!<br /> +<!-- page 70--><a name="page70"></a><span class="pagenum">p. +70</span>O come with saintly look, and steadfast step,<br /> +From forth thy cave embower’d with mournful yew,<br /> +Where ever to the curfeu’s solemn sound<br /> +List’ning thou sitt’st, and with thy cypress bind<br +/> +Thy votary’s hair, and seal him for thy son.</p> +</blockquote> +<p>Melancholy seems not to have answered these advances. In +later life Warton was a short, squat, red-faced man, fond of ale, +and a cheerful talker, with a thick utterance, so that he gobbled +like a turkey-cock. Some of his verses are cheerful. +This is from the <i>Ode on the Approach of Summer</i>:</p> +<blockquote><p>Haste thee, Nymph! and hand in hand<br /> +With thee lead a buxom band;<br /> +Bring fantastic-footed Joy,<br /> +With Sport, that yellow-tressed boy:<br /> +Leisure, that through the balmy sky<br /> +Chases a crimson butterfly.<br /> +Bring Health, that loves in early dawn<br /> +To meet the milk-maid on the lawn;<br /> +Bring Pleasure, rural nymph, and Peace,<br /> +Meek, cottage-loving shepherdess!</p> +</blockquote> +<p>It is all like this, fluent and unnecessary. Perhaps no +verses in English were ever made so exactly in the approved +fashion of modern Latin verses. Warton writes pleasantly, +his <!-- page 71--><a name="page71"></a><span class="pagenum">p. +71</span>cento of reminiscences is skilful, and his own epithets +are sometimes happy, yet nothing comes of it. His work +suggests the doubt whether any modern Latin verse, even the best, +would deceive an intelligent citizen of ancient Rome.</p> +<p>The strange thing about the Romantic Revival is that an +epidemic of this sort of imitation at last produced real poetry +and real romance. The industrious simulation of the +emotions begot the emotions simulated. Is there not a story +told of a young officer who, having dressed himself in a sheet to +frighten his fellows, was embarrassed by the company of a real +ghost, bent on the same errand; and retired from the enterprise, +leaving it wholly to the professional? That, at any rate, +is very much what happened to the Romantic impersonators.</p> +<p>Another parallel may perhaps be found in the power of +vulgarity to advance civilization. Take, for instance, the +question of manners. Politeness is a codification of the +impulses of a heart that is moved by good will and consideration +for others. If the impulses are not <!-- page 72--><a +name="page72"></a><span class="pagenum">p. 72</span>there, the +politeness is so far unreal and insincere—a cheap +varnish. Yet it is insisted on by society, and enforced by +fear and fashion. If the forms are taught, the soul of them +may be, and sometimes is, breathed in later. So this +imitative and timid artifice, this conformity to opinions the +ground and meaning of which is not fully understood, becomes a +great engine of social progress. Imitation and forgery, +which are a kind of literary vulgarity, were the school of +Romanticism in its nonage. Some of the greater poets who +passed this way went on to express things subtler and more +profound than had found a voice in the poetry that they +imitated.</p> +<p>The long debate on the so-called poems of Ossian is now +ended. They are known to be a not very skilful forgery by +James Macpherson. Yet their importance in literary history +remains undiminished, and the life of Macpherson has a curious +kind of pathos. He was the creature and victim of the +Romantic movement, and was led, by almost insensible degrees, +into supplying fraudulent evidence for the favorite Romantic +theory that a truer and deeper <!-- page 73--><a +name="page73"></a><span class="pagenum">p. 73</span>vein of +poetry is to be found among primitive peoples. +Collins’s <i>Ode on the Popular Superstitions of the +Highlands of Scotland</i> and Gray’s <i>Bard</i> show the +literary world prepared to put itself to school to Celtic +tradition. Macpherson supplied it with a body of poetry +which exactly fulfilled its expectations. The crucial date +in his history is his meeting in 1759 with John Home, the author +of the once famous tragedy of <i>Douglas</i>. In the summer +of that year Home was drinking the waters at Moffat, and among +the visitors assembled there found Thomas Graham, afterwards Lord +Lynedoch, then a boy of ten, and his tutor, James Macpherson, a +young Highlander, shy and ambitious, who had been educated at +Aberdeen and Edinburgh, and had dabbled in verse. Home, +full of the literary gossip of the hour, seized upon the +opportunity to question Macpherson concerning the poems that were +rumored to have survived among the Gaelic-speaking population of +Scotland. In the light of what we now know it is not +difficult to understand the genesis of this great European +fraud. Macpherson was proud of his race, which he had <!-- +page 74--><a name="page74"></a><span class="pagenum">p. +74</span>celebrated in an heroic poem called <i>The +Highlander</i>. He had interested himself in Gaelic poetry, +though his knowledge of the tongue was not good, and he had by +him some fragments of genuine Gaelic poems. He was +flattered by Home’s appeal to him, and, feeling perhaps +that the few and slight genuine poems which he could produce +would hardly warrant the magnificence of his allusions to Gaelic +literature, he forged a tale in poetic prose, called <i>The Death +of Oscar</i>, and presented it to Home as a translation from the +Gaelic. The poem was much admired, and Macpherson, unable +now to retrace his steps without declaring himself a cheat, soon +produced others from the same source. These were submitted +to the literary society of Edinburgh, with the great Dr. Blair at +its head, and were pronounced to be the wonder of the +world. From this point onward, during a long and melancholy +life, poor Macpherson was enslaved to the fraud which had its +beginning in the shyness and vanity of his own character. +He was bound now to forge or to fail; and no doubt the +consciousness that it was his own work which <!-- page 75--><a +name="page75"></a><span class="pagenum">p. 75</span>called forth +such rapturous applause supported him in his labors and justified +him to his own conscience. A subscription was easily raised +in Edinburgh to enable him to travel and collect the remains of +Celtic poetry. For a few months he perambulated the western +highlands and islands, and returned to Edinburgh bringing with +him <i>Fingal</i>, a complete epic poem in six books. This +was followed by <i>Temora</i>, in eight books, also attributed to +the great Gaelic bard Ossian; and the new Celtic fashion was +established.</p> +<p>These poems had an immense success. Everyone knows how +they influenced the youth of Goethe, and captured the imagination +of Napoleon. It is less surprising that they enraptured the +poet Gray, and were approved by the professor Blair, for they +were exactly modelled on the practice and theory of these two +critics. All the fashionable doctrine of that age +concerning the history of poetry was borne out by these +works. Poetry, so it was held, is to be found in its +perfection only in primitive society, before it is overlaid by +the complexities of modern civilization. Its <!-- page +76--><a name="page76"></a><span class="pagenum">p. 76</span>most +perfect, and therefore its earliest, form, is the epic; and Dr. +Blair must have been delighted to find that the laws of the epic, +which he so often explained to his class in Edinburgh University, +were minutely observed by the oldest of Scottish bards. He +died without suspecting that the inspiration of the Ossianic +poems had come partly from himself.</p> +<p>The belief that Celtic literature is essentially and eternally +melancholy,—a belief which persisted down to the time of +Matthew Arnold, also drew its strength from the poems of +Ossian. Here again theory showed the way to practice. +The melancholy of the Ossianic poems is not the melancholy of the +Celt, but a melancholy compounded of many simples, and extracted +from works that were held in high esteem in the eighteenth +century—Young’s <i>Night Thoughts</i>, Blair’s +<i>Grave</i>, Gray’s <i>Bard</i>, and the soliloquies of +Milton’s Satan.</p> +<p>Macpherson was soon challenged, and his whole life was passed +in a brawl of controversy. Two famous men dismissed him +contemptuously. Dr. Johnson, who knew what honesty means +among scholars, treated him as an impudent <!-- page 77--><a +name="page77"></a><span class="pagenum">p. +77</span>impostor. Wordsworth, who knew what simplicity +means in poetry, declared that all the imagery of the poems is +false and spurious. But the whole question early became a +national quarrel, and the honor of Scotland was involved in +it. There are signs that Macpherson would gladly have +escaped from the storm he had raised. Aided by his early +literary success, he became a prosperous man, held a well-paid +post at court, entered Parliament, and was pensioned by the +government. Still the controversy persisted. He had +found it easy to take up a haughty attitude towards those hostile +critics who had doubted his good faith and had asked him to +produce his Gaelic originals. But now the demand for the +originals came from his champions and friends, who desired to +place the fame of Scotland’s oldest and greatest poet on a +sure foundation. He wriggled on the hook, and more than +once timidly hinted that the poems owed not a little to the +poetic genius of the translator. But this half-hearted +attempt to rob the great Ossian of a part of his fame stirred the +Caledonian enthusiasts to a frenzy of indignation. At last, +<!-- page 78--><a name="page78"></a><span class="pagenum">p. +78</span>when he was no longer able to restrain his supporters, +the wretched Macpherson found no escape but one. In middle +age, some twenty years after his first appearance on the poetic +horizon, he sat down, with a heavy heart and an imperfect +knowledge of the Gaelic tongue, to forge the originals. In +1807, eleven years after his death, these were at last +published. The progress of genuine Celtic scholarship +during the succeeding century did the rest; and the old blind +bard rejoined the mists and vapors which were the inspiration of +his Muse. <a name="citation78"></a><a href="#footnote78" +class="citation">[78]</a> The poems of Ossian are only one, +though perhaps the most signal, instance of the forgeries which +prevailed like an epidemic at the time of the Romantic +Revival. Some of these, like Ireland’s Shakespeare +forgeries, were little better than cold-blooded mercenary +frauds. Others, like Chatterton’s Rowley Poems and +Horace Walpole’s <i>Castle of Otranto</i>, are full of the +zest and delight of play-acting. Even Coleridge’s +<i>Ancient Mariner</i>, though it is free from the reproach of +forgery, is touched by the <!-- page 79--><a +name="page79"></a><span class="pagenum">p. 79</span>same +spirit. The severe morality of scholarship had not yet been +applied to mediaeval or modern matter. Scholars are the +trustees of poets; but where this trust is undertaken by men who +are poets themselves, there is usually a good deal of gaiety and +exuberance in its performance.</p> +<p>I have now traced some of the neglected sources of revived +Romance, and have shown how in this movement, more notably, +perhaps, than in any other great movement in literature, it was +not the supply which created the demand, but the demand which +created the supply. The Romantic change was wrought, not by +the energy of lonely pioneers, but by a shift in public +taste. Readers of poetry knew what it was they wanted, even +before they knew whether it existed. Writers were soon at +hand to prove that it had existed in the past, and could still be +made. The weakness of vague desire is felt everywhere in +the origins of the change. Out of the weakness came +strength; the tinsel Gothic castle of Walpole was enlarged to +house the magnanimous soul of Scott; the Sorrows of Werther gave +birth to <i>Faust</i>.</p> +<p><!-- page 80--><a name="page80"></a><span class="pagenum">p. +80</span>The weakness of the Romantic movement, its love of mere +sensation and sentiment, is well exhibited in its effect upon the +sane and strong mind of Keats. He was a pupil of the +Romantics; and poetry, as he first conceived of it, seemed to +open to him boundless fields of passive enjoyment. His +early work shows the struggle between the delicious swoon of +reverie and the growing pains of thought. His verse, in its +beginnings, was crowded with “luxuries, bright, milky, +soft, and rosy.” He was a boy at the time of +England’s greatest naval glory, but he thinks more of Robin +Hood than of Nelson. If Robin Hood could revisit the +forest, says Keats,</p> +<blockquote><p>He would swear, for all his oaks<br /> +Fallen beneath the dockyard strokes,<br /> +Have rotted on the briny seas.</p> +</blockquote> +<p>His use of a word like “rich,” as Mr. Robert +Bridges has remarked, is almost inhuman in its luxurious +detachment from the human situation.</p> +<blockquote><p>Now more than ever seems it rich to die,<br /> +To cease upon the midnight with no pain.<br /> +<!-- page 81--><a name="page81"></a><span class="pagenum">p. +81</span>Or if thy mistress some rich anger shows,<br /> +Emprison her soft hand, and let her rave.</p> +</blockquote> +<p>By his work in this kind Keats became the parent and founder +of the Aesthetic School of poetry, which is more than half in +love with easeful death, and seeks nothing so ardently as rest +and escape from the world. The epilogue to the Aesthetic +movement was written by William Morris before ever he broke out +from those enchanted bowers:</p> +<blockquote><p>So with this earthly paradise it is,<br /> +If ye will read aright, and pardon me<br /> +Who strive to build a shadowy isle of bliss<br /> +Midmost the beating of the steely sea,<br /> +Where tossed about all hearts of men must be,<br /> + Whose ravening monsters mighty men must slay,<br /> + Not the poor singer of an empty +day.</p> +</blockquote> +<p>Yet there is another side to the work of Keats, more wonderful +in its broken promise than all the soft perfections of his tender +Muse. He grew tired of imitation and ease. Weakness +may exclude the world by forgetting it; only strength can conquer +the world. What if this law be also the law of +beauty? The thought inspires his last great attempt, <!-- +page 82--><a name="page82"></a><span class="pagenum">p. +82</span>the fragment of <i>Hyperion</i>. Men have their +dynasties and revolutions; but the immortals also, whom men +worship, must change to live.</p> +<blockquote><p>So on our heels a fresh perfection treads,<br /> +A power more strong in beauty.</p> +</blockquote> +<p>And this power cannot be won by those who shirk the challenge +of ugly facts.</p> +<blockquote><p>O folly! for to bear all naked truths,<br /> +And to envisage circumstance, all calm,<br /> +That is the top of sovereignty.</p> +</blockquote> +<p>As if to enforce his thought by repetition, Keats made an +allegorical framework for his revised version of the poem. +There he exhibits himself as wandering among the delights of the +garden of this life, and indulging himself to the point of +drunkenness. Awaked from his swoon, he finds himself at the +steps of the temple of fame. He is told he must climb or +die. After an agony of struggle he mounts to the top, and +has speech there with a veiled figure, who tells him that this +temple is all that has been spared in the war between the rival +houses of the Gods. When he asks why he <!-- page 83--><a +name="page83"></a><span class="pagenum">p. 83</span>has been +saved from death, the veiled figure makes reply:</p> +<blockquote><p>“None can usurp this height,” +return’d that shade,<br /> +“But those to whom the miseries of the world<br /> +Are misery, and will not let them rest.”<br /> +* * * * *<br /> +“Are there not thousands in the world,” said I,<br /> +Encourag’d by the sooth voice of the shade,<br /> +“Who love their fellows even to the death,<br /> +Who feel the giant agony of the world,<br /> +And more, like slaves to poor humanity,<br /> +Labour for mortal good? I sure should see<br /> +Other men here, but I am here alone.”<br /> +“Those whom thou spakest of are no visionaries,”<br +/> +Rejoined that voice; “they are no dreamers weak;<br /> +They seek no wonder but the human face,<br /> +No music but a happy-noted voice:<br /> +They come not here, they have no thought to come;<br /> +And thou art here, for thou art less than they.<br /> +What benefit canst thou do, or all thy tribe,<br /> +To the great world? Thou art a dreaming thing,<br /> +A fever of thyself: think of the earth;<br /> +What bliss, even in hope, is there for thee?<br /> +What haven? every creature hath its home,<br /> +Every sole man hath days of joy and pain,<br /> +Whether his labours be sublime or low—<br /> +The pain alone, the joy alone, distinct:<br /> +Only the dreamer venoms all his days,<br /> +Bearing more woe than all his sins deserve.”</p> +</blockquote> +<p><!-- page 84--><a name="page84"></a><span class="pagenum">p. +84</span>In this, which is almost his last deliberate utterance, +Keats expresses his sense of the futility of romance, and seems +to condemn poetry itself. A condemnation of the expression +of profound thought in beautiful forms would come very ill from +Keats, but this much he surely had learned, that poetry, the real +high poetry, cannot be made out of dreams. The worst of +dreams is that you cannot discipline them. Their tragedy is +night-mare; their comedy is nonsense. Only what can stand +severe discipline, and emerge the purer and stronger for it, is +fit to endure. For all its sins of flatness and prosiness +the Classical School has always taught discipline. No doubt +it has sometimes trusted too absolutely to discipline, and has +given us too much of the foot-rule and the tuning-fork. But +one discipline, at least, poetry cannot afford to +neglect—the discipline of facts and life. The poetry +that can face this ordeal and survive it is rare. Some +poets are tempted to avoid the experience and save the +dream. Others, who were poets in their youth, undergo the +experience and are beaten by it. But the poetry which can +bear all naked truth and still keep its singing voice is the only +immortal poetry.</p> +<h2>Footnotes:</h2> +<p><a name="footnote78"></a><a href="#citation78" +class="footnote">[78]</a> For some of the facts in this +account of Ossian I am indebted to Mr. J. S. Smart’s +fascinating book, <i>James Macpherson</i>, <i>an Episode in +Literature</i> (David Nutt, 1905).</p> +<p>End of the Project Gutenberg eBook *** Corrected to here, +scaps check done, italic check done, spell-check done ***</p> +<p>***END OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK ROMANCE***</p> +<pre> + + +***** This file should be named 19367-h.htm or 19367-h.zip****** + + +This and all associated files of various formats will be found in: +http://www.gutenberg.org/dirs/1/9/3/6/19367 + + + +Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions +will be renamed. + +Creating the works from public domain print editions means that no +one owns a United States copyright in these works, so the Foundation +(and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United States without +permission and without paying copyright royalties. Special rules, +set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license, apply to +copying and distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works to +protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm concept and trademark. Project +Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if you +charge for the eBooks, unless you receive specific permission. If you +do not charge anything for copies of this eBook, complying with the +rules is very easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose +such as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and +research. They may be modified and printed and given away--you may do +practically ANYTHING with public domain eBooks. Redistribution is +subject to the trademark license, especially commercial +redistribution. + + + +*** START: FULL LICENSE *** + +THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE +PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK + +To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free +distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work +(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project +Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full Project +Gutenberg-tm License (available with this file or online at +http://www.gutenberg.org/license). + + +Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic works + +1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to +and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property +(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all +the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or destroy +all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your possession. +If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the +terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or +entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8. + +1.B. "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark. It may only be +used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who +agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few +things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works +even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See +paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement +and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works. See paragraph 1.E below. + +1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the Foundation" +or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection of Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic works. Nearly all the individual works in the +collection are in the public domain in the United States. If an +individual work is in the public domain in the United States and you are +located in the United States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from +copying, distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative +works based on the work as long as all references to Project Gutenberg +are removed. Of course, we hope that you will support the Project +Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting free access to electronic works by +freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm works in compliance with the terms of +this agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with +the work. You can easily comply with the terms of this agreement by +keeping this work in the same format with its attached full Project +Gutenberg-tm License when you share it without charge with others. + +1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern +what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are in +a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States, check +the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this agreement +before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, distributing or +creating derivative works based on this work or any other Project +Gutenberg-tm work. The Foundation makes no representations concerning +the copyright status of any work in any country outside the United +States. + +1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg: + +1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate +access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear prominently +whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work on which the +phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the phrase "Project +Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed, viewed, +copied or distributed: + +This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with +almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or +re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included +with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org + +1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is derived +from the public domain (does not contain a notice indicating that it is +posted with permission of the copyright holder), the work can be copied +and distributed to anyone in the United States without paying any fees +or charges. If you are redistributing or providing access to a work +with the phrase "Project Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the +work, you must comply either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1 +through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the +Project Gutenberg-tm trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or +1.E.9. + +1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted +with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution +must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any additional +terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms will be linked +to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works posted with the +permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of this work. + +1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm +License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this +work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm. + +1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this +electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without +prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with +active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project +Gutenberg-tm License. + +1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary, +compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including any +word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access to or +distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format other than +"Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official version +posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm web site (www.gutenberg.org), +you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a +copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon +request, of the work in its original "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other +form. Any alternate format must include the full Project Gutenberg-tm +License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1. + +1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying, +performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works +unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9. + +1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing +access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works provided +that + +- You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from + the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method + you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is + owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he + has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the + Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments + must be paid within 60 days following each date on which you + prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your periodic tax + returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked as such and + sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the + address specified in Section 4, "Information about donations to + the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation." + +- You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies + you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he + does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm + License. You must require such a user to return or + destroy all copies of the works possessed in a physical medium + and discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of + Project Gutenberg-tm works. + +- You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any + money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the + electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days + of receipt of the work. + +- You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free + distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works. + +1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set +forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from +both the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and Michael +Hart, the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark. Contact the +Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below. + +1.F. + +1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable +effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread +public domain works in creating the Project Gutenberg-tm +collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may contain +"Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or +corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual +property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other medium, a +computer virus, or computer codes that damage or cannot be read by +your equipment. + +1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right +of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project +Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project +Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all +liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal +fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT +LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE +PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH F3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE +TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE +LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR +INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH +DAMAGE. + +1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a +defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can +receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a +written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you +received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium with +your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you with +the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu of a +refund. If you received the work electronically, the person or entity +providing it to you may choose to give you a second opportunity to +receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If the second copy +is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing without further +opportunities to fix the problem. + +1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth +in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS', WITH NO OTHER +WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO +WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTIBILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE. + +1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied +warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages. +If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the +law of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be +interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by +the applicable state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any +provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions. + +1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the +trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone +providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in accordance +with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the production, +promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works, +harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees, +that arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do +or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg-tm +work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or deletions to any +Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any Defect you cause. + + +Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm + +Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of +electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of computers +including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It exists +because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations from +people in all walks of life. + +Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the +assistance they need, is critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's +goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will +remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project +Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure +and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future generations. +To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation +and how your efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4 +and the Foundation web page at http://www.gutenberg.org/fundraising/pglaf. + + +Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive +Foundation + +The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non profit +501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the +state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal +Revenue Service. The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification +number is 64-6221541. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg +Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent +permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state's laws. + +The Foundation's principal office is located at 4557 Melan Dr. S. +Fairbanks, AK, 99712., but its volunteers and employees are scattered +throughout numerous locations. Its business office is located at +809 North 1500 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887, email +business@pglaf.org. Email contact links and up to date contact +information can be found at the Foundation's web site and official +page at http://www.gutenberg.org/about/contact + +For additional contact information: + Dr. Gregory B. Newby + Chief Executive and Director + gbnewby@pglaf.org + +Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg +Literary Archive Foundation + +Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without wide +spread public support and donations to carry out its mission of +increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be +freely distributed in machine readable form accessible by the widest +array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations +($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt +status with the IRS. + +The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating +charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United +States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a +considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up +with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations +where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To +SEND DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any +particular state visit http://www.gutenberg.org/fundraising/donate + +While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we +have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition +against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who +approach us with offers to donate. + +International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make +any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from +outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff. + +Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation +methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other +ways including checks, online payments and credit card donations. +To donate, please visit: +http://www.gutenberg.org/fundraising/donate + + +Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works. + +Professor Michael S. Hart is the originator of the Project Gutenberg-tm +concept of a library of electronic works that could be freely shared +with anyone. For thirty years, he produced and distributed Project +Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer support. + +Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed +editions, all of which are confirmed as Public Domain in the U.S. +unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not necessarily +keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper edition. + +Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search facility: + + http://www.gutenberg.org + +This Web site includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm, +including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary +Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to +subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks. + +</pre></body> +</html> |