diff options
| author | Roger Frank <rfrank@pglaf.org> | 2025-10-15 04:52:48 -0700 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Roger Frank <rfrank@pglaf.org> | 2025-10-15 04:52:48 -0700 |
| commit | 8b33b7a01b184b3db416c52005a12066aaa05a3b (patch) | |
| tree | 7d40d15a2da2f860a3d5764606b60471becec463 /18218-h | |
Diffstat (limited to '18218-h')
| -rw-r--r-- | 18218-h/18218-h.htm | 16943 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | 18218-h/images/001.png | bin | 0 -> 13685 bytes |
2 files changed, 16943 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/18218-h/18218-h.htm b/18218-h/18218-h.htm new file mode 100644 index 0000000..48b4ec8 --- /dev/null +++ b/18218-h/18218-h.htm @@ -0,0 +1,16943 @@ +<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" + "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd"> + +<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> + <head> + <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;charset=iso-8859-1" /> + <title> + The Project Gutenberg eBook of The Works of the Right Honourable Edmund Burke, Vol. XI. (of 12), by Edmund Burke + </title> + <style type="text/css"> + + <!-- /* old browser blockout*/ + /* <![CDATA[ XML blockout */ + + + +/* + * set the global font family + */ + /* { font-family: serif; } */ + +/* + * set the body margins + */ + body {margin-left: 8%; margin-right: 25%; + + } + +/* + * set the body text indention, and spacing, and leading + */ + p { /* all paragraphs unless overridden */ + margin-top: 1em; + margin-bottom: 0; + line-height: 1.4em; + } + + body > p { /* paras at <body> level - not in <div> or <table> */ + text-align: justify; + text-indent: 1em; + } + + p.break { margin-top: 2em; } /* use for some thought-breaks */ + + dd, li {/* loosen spacing in list items */ + margin-top: 0.33em; + line-height: 1.2em; } + +/* + * style h2 for chapter heads + */ + + h2 { text-align: center; /* left-aligned by default, left/right margins set globally */ + margin-top:2em; /* clear space above top border */ + /* border-left: 3px solid gray; REMOVED BY MP */ + /* border-top: 4px solid gray; */ + /* padding-left:2em; /* space in from left border */ + padding-top:0.5em; /* space down from top border */ + padding-bottom: 1em; /* push left border below text */ + clear: both; /* don't let sidebars overlap */ + } + +/* + * style h3 for topic heads + */ + h3 { + text-align: center; /* uncomment for centered heading */ + margin-top: 2em; + font-family: sans-serif; + font-weight: normal; /* override default of bold */ + font-size: 95%; + clear: both; /* don't let sidebars overlap */ + } + +/* + * suppress indentation on paragraphs following heads + */ + h1+p, h2+p, h3+p { text-indent: 0; } + +/* + * Style the blockquote tag and related: + * - inset left and right + * - one-point smaller font (questionable?) + * - <p class="citation"> right-just and italicized + * - <p class="signature"> deeply indented + */ + .blockquote { + margin-left: 5%; + margin-right: 5%; + } + p.citation { /* author citation at end of blockquote or poem */ + margin-left:20%; + text-align: left; + /* text-align: right; MP, I DON'T LIKE THIS */ + /* font-style: italic; MP, I DON'T LIKE THIS */ + } + p.quotdate { /* date of a letter aligned right */ + text-align: right; + } + p.quotsig { /* author signature at end of letter */ + margin-left: 35%; + text-indent: -4em; /* gimmick to move 2nd line right */ + } + p.noindent { /* For paras continuing after quote, table, etc. (where no indent in original) MP */ + text-indent: 0; + } +/* + * Provide a selection of special list enumeration styles + */ + ol.AL { list-style-type: lower-alpha; } + ol.AU { list-style-type: upper-alpha; } + ol.RU { list-style-type: upper-roman; } + ol.RL { list-style-type: lower-roman; } + dt { margin-top: 0.5em; } + /* turn off list decoration in a single item to form the + * second para of a 2-para item: < li class="off" > + * or make an unmarked list: < ul class="off" > + */ + .off { list-style-type: none; } /* 2nd para of a 2-para list item */ +/* + * In all browsers **except MSIE 5** the items of an "inside" list are + * indented as if they still had their symbol. + */ + ol.inside, ul.inside { + list-style-position: inside; + margin-left: -2.5em; /* For everybody but MSIE 5, boo */} +/* + * The TOC, LOI, and Index are unordered lists with no prefix symbols. + * The tocright class is used to right-align page numbers in a TOC + * (not to be confused with linenum, used for poetry line#s). + */ + +/* MP... In konqueror, the numbers all pile up together at the first item */ + + ul.TOC { /* styling the Table of Contents */ + list-style-type: none; /* a list with no symbol */ + position: relative; /* makes a "container" for span.tocright */ + margin-right: 5%; /* pulls the page#s in a skosh */ + padding-right: 3em; /* MP stops text hitting numbers */ + margin-left: 1em; /* MP for long titles,indent all lines */ + text-indent: -1em; /* MP for long titles, unindent 1st line */ + } + ul.TOCSub { /* sub-entries in the TOC */ + list-style-type: none; + position: relative; /* makes a "container" for span.tocright */ + margin-right: 10%; /* pulls these page#s in even more */ + padding-right: 3em; /* MP stops text hitting numbers */ + margin-left: 1em; /* MP for long titles,indent all lines */ + text-indent: -1em; /* MP for long titles, unindent 1st line */ + } + span.tocright { /* use absolute positioning to move page# right */ + position: absolute; right: 0; text-indent: 0;/* valign: bottom; */ + } + ul.LOI { /* styling the List of Illustrations */ + list-style-type: none; + position: relative; /* makes a "container" for span.tocright */ + margin-right: 5%; /* pulls the page#s in a skosh */ + } + + ul.IX { /* styling the IndeX */ + list-style-type: none; + font-size: 80%; + } + ul.IXSub { /* sub-terms in the index */ + list-style-type: none; + } + ul.IX li { /* list items in an index list: compressed */ + margin-top: 0; + } + +/* + * style the default horizontal-rule and some special ones + */ + hr { + width:45%; + margin-top: 1em; + margin-left: auto; /* these two ensure a.. */ + margin-right: auto; /* ..centered rule */ + clear: both; /* don't let sidebars & floats overlap rule */ + } + hr.major { width:75%; margin-top:2em; margin-bottom: 2em;} /* eg, above chapter head */ + hr.minor { width:30%; } /* eg, above/below epigraph */ +/* + * a div with centering, use for images and tables + * to center a table or image in all browsers: + * <div class="ctr"> <table/img ... > ... < / div> + */ + div.ctr { text-align: center; } + div.ctr table { margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; text-align: left; } + div.ctr img { margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; } + +/* + * Use of <ins> ... < /ins> for marking corrected typos: + * Surround the corrected text with: + * <ins class="correction" + * title="Transcriber's Note: original read 'txet'">text< /ins> + * Very fine underline is not intrusive. Explanation pops up on hover. + */ + ins.correction { + text-decoration:none; + border-bottom: thin dotted gray;} + +/* + * Styling for images and captions + */ + img { /* the default image has */ + border: 1px solid black; /* a thin black line border */ + padding: 6px; /* ..spaced a bit out from the graphic */ + } + + img.plain { /* image with no border or padding, see float */ + border: none; padding: 0; + } + p.caption { margin-top: 0; font-size: smaller; } + +/* + * style sidenotes as class="sn", use in div or p + * guiguts expects a class "sidenote" + */ + .sn, .sidenote { + /* sidenote box appearance controls: */ + width: 15em; /* ..fixed width, */ + float: right; /* ..float to the right, */ + margin-right: -16em; /* ..exdent into body margin */ + margin-top: 0; /* top even with following <p>'s top */ + border: 1px dotted black; /* ..optional border */ + background-color: rgb(90%,90%,90%); /* ..optional tint */ + /* sidenote content control: */ + font-size: smaller; /* ..small text; could be x-small */ + text-indent: 0; /* ..no para indent */ + text-align: left; /* ..right align text in box */ + margin-left: 0.2em; /* ensure space from text */ + } + +/* + * style sidebars as div class="sb" + */ + .sb { + width: 40%; /* make 100% to force in-line */ + float: right; + border: 1px solid black; /* need border to separate from body */ + padding: 0 0 0 0.5em; /* get text away from border */ + margin: 0 0 1em 0.5em; /* get border clear of body text */ + background-color: rgb(90%,90%,90%); /* ..optional tint */ + } +/* + * style floating images just like sidebars but no border + * Use image class="plain", as div border encloses all. + * Use div when caption accompanies image, span for image-only + * Note: guiguts expects class names figleft, figright + */ + .floatr, .figright { + float: right; + clear: right; /* don't allow overlaps */ + text-align: center; /* img, caption centered in box */ + border: 1px solid black; /* thin border */ + margin-left: 4px; /* keep body text away from border */ + padding: 3px; /* keep caption text away border */ + } + + .floatl, .figleft { + float: left; + clear: left; /* don't allow overlaps */ + text-align: center; /* img, caption centered in box */ + border: 1px solid black; /* thin border */ + margin-right: 4px; /* keep body text away from border */ + padding: 3px; /* keep caption text from touching border */ + } +/* + * Styling tables and their content + */ + + table { /* style all < table> elements */ + margin-top: 1em; /* space above the table */ + caption-side: /* top; or */ bottom ; + empty-cells: show; /* usual default is hide */ + } + + thead td, tfoot td { /* center & bold */ + text-align: center; + font-weight: bold; + background-color: #ddd; /* dubious: gray background */ + } + table .shade { /* tr or td class="shade" */ + background-color: #ddd; + } + td, td > p { + margin-top: 0.25em; + /* line-height: 1.1em; OLD */ + /* font-size: 90%; OLD */ + /* text-align: left; OLD*/ + } + td.wrap { /* MP's magic table: For cells in 1st col with lots of text, + allows rewrap with indent. + set padding-left: to 1 on main table... + Numbers following should be "valign: bottom"*/ + text-indent: -1em; + padding-right: 2em; + } + /* use to add borders to table cells */ + .bb {border-bottom: solid 1px;} + .bl {border-left: solid 1px;} + .bt {border-top: solid 1px;} + .br {border-right: solid 1px;} + .bbox {border: solid 1px;} + .center {text-align: center;} +/* + * Styling Poetry the method generated by Guiguts: + * div class=poem encloses poem + * h4 within the poem div for poem title + * div class=stanza encloses stanza + * p [class=iN] encloses line + * span class=linenum encloses line number + */ + .poem { + text-align: left; + margin-left: 5%; margin-right: 5%; + position: relative; /* basis of .linenum positions */ + /* background-color: #fdc; /* Demonstration only: DELETE */ + } + .poem h4 { + margin-left: 5em; + text-decoration: underline; + } + .poem .stanza { + margin-top: 1em; /* vertical break between stanzas */ + } + .stanza div { /* default line */ + line-height: 1.2em; + margin-top: 0em; + margin-left: 2em; + text-indent: -2em; + } + .poem .i1 {margin-left: 2em;} /* p or span indents */ + .poem .i2 {margin-left: 4em;} /* indents */ + .poem .i3 {margin-left: 5em;} /* indents */ + .poem .i4 {margin-left: 6em;} /* indents */ + .poem .i5 {margin-left: 7em;} /* indents */ + .poem .i6 {margin-left: 8em;} /* indents */ + .poem .i7 {margin-left: 9em;} /* indents */ + .poem .i8 {margin-left: 10em;} /* indents */ + .poem .i9 {margin-left: 11em;} /* indents */ + .poem .caesura { /* vertical break in mid-line */ + vertical-align: -200%; + } + + .poem .linenum { + margin: 0; text-indent:0; + font-size: 90%; /* they are smaller */ + text-align: center; /* centered in a space... */ + width: 1.75em; /* ...about 3+ digits wide */ + position: absolute; /* positioned out of text flow */ + /*left: -4em; ...positioned in LEFT margin */ + right: -4em; /* ...positioned in RIGHT margin */ + color: #777; background-color: #ddd; /* medium gray on light gray */ + /* color: #fff; background-color: #888; white on medium gray */ + } + +/* + * Making page numbers visible: Change the display: value of this class + * for visible page numbers: "inline" + * for hidden page numbers: "none" + */ + +/* THESE LINES ADDED BY MP */ + /*.pagenum {position: absolute; left: 92%; font-size: smaller; text-align: right; color: #778899;} /* page numbers */ + /*.pagenum {position: absolute; right: 1%; font-size: smaller; text-align: left; color: #778899;} /* page numbers */ + .pagenum { + font-size: smaller; + text-align: right; + padding: 0 0 0 0 ; + margin: 0 0 0 0; + position: absolute; right: 1%; + color: #778899; + } + /* Uncomment to get page numbers displayed with text */ + a.pagenum:after {display: inline; color: #778899; /* background-color: yellow;*/ content: "{" attr(title) "}";} + + /* Change cursor over Greek text (the transliteration will appear in a popup) */ + :lang(el) {cursor: help;} + + +/* + * This code uses the :after selector to display the title string + * from the anchor inline in the text. It presumes every page anchor is: + * <a class="page1" id="Page_NN" title="NN" > < /a> + * + * Advantage: non-CSS browsers display nothing. + * Problem: display is within the text between words. (you can't do + * absolute positioning of generated content.) + */ + .page1:after { + display: inline; /* none or inline */ + content: "[" attr(title) "]"; + font-size: 50%; + background-color: rgb(95%,95%,95%); + vertical-align: 0.25em; /* raise its baseline */ + } +/* + * This code uses absolute positioning to display page numbers in the + * right margin. It presumes that every page-number anchor is augmented + * with a text span: + * <a id="Page_NN">< /a> <span class="page2">NN< /span> + * + * Advantage: absolute positioning lets you put #s in the margin. + * Drawback: non-CSS browsers display the number inline instead. + * Drawback: multiple pagenumbers in the same text line overlap in the margin + */ + + .page2 { display: inline; /* none or inline */ + font-size:50%; + text-align: right; + padding: 0 0 0 0 ; + margin: 0 0 0 0; + position: absolute; right: 1%;} + +/* + * Styling footnotes and their references. See text for discussion. + * NOTE: Guiguts keeps changing the classnames it uses for the + * footnote div and p's. Be prepared to change these to match. + */ + + .fnanchor { /* MODIFIED FROM fnref BY MP FOR GUIGUTS NOMENCLATURE */ + font-size: smaller; /* discreet [X] */ + vertical-align: 2px; /* bumped up a trace from baseline */ + } + + .note { + font-size: 90%; /* somewhat smaller */ + margin: 0 2em 2em 1em; + text-align: justify; + } + + .footnotes { /* ADDED BY MP */ + border: dashed 1px; /* Added by MP */ + /*but note that knoqueror messes it up (though readable)*/ + } +/* + * Stylings for drama: + * h4.scn is the scene-header, centered, italic + * span.cnm is for all character-names + * p.sdn is the stage-direction paragraph + * span.sdr is the end-of-line right-aligned direction + * span.sdm is the mid-line embedded direction + */ + + h4.scn { + text-align: center; font-weight: normal; font-style: italic; + } + p.sdn { + text-align: center; font-style: italic; + } + p.dlg { + margin:0.25em; + line-height: 1.2em; + position: relative; /* establish "container" for span.sdn */ + } + .dlg .in5em { position:relative; left: 5em; } + .dlg .in10em { position: relative; left: 10em; } + span.sdm { font-style: italic; } + span.sdm:before { font-style:normal; content: "[" } + span.sdm:after { font-style:normal; content: "]" } + span.sdr { + font-style: italic; + position: absolute; + text-align: right; + right: 0; top:auto; + } + span.sdr:before { font-style:normal; content: "[" } + .cnm { /* Character NaMe default (dialog) */ + font-style: italic; + } + .sdn .cnm, sdm .cnm, .sdr .cnm { /* Character NaMe inside Stage DirectioN */ + font-style: normal; + } + .dlg .linenum { + margin: 0; text-indent:0; + font-size: 90%; /* they are smaller */ + text-align: center; /* centered in a space... */ + width: 1.75em; /* ...about 3+ digits wide */ + position: absolute; /* positioned out of text flow */ + /* left: -5em; ...positioned in LEFT margin */ + right: 0; /* ...positioned in RIGHT margin */ + color: #000; background-color: #ccc; /* black on light gray */ + } + + /* XML end ]]> */ /*old browser end */ --> + </style> + </head> +<body> + + +<pre> + +The Project Gutenberg EBook of The Works of the Right Honourable Edmund +Burke, Vol. XI. (of 12), by Edmund Burke + +This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with +almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or +re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included +with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org + + +Title: The Works of the Right Honourable Edmund Burke, Vol. XI. (of 12) + +Author: Edmund Burke + +Release Date: April 20, 2006 [EBook #18218] + +Language: English + +Character set encoding: ISO-8859-1 + +*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE WORKS OF THE RIGHT *** + + + + +Produced by Paul Murray, Susan Skinner and the Online +Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net (This +file was produced from images generously made available +by the Bibliothèque nationale de France (BnF/Gallica) at +http://gallica.bnf.fr) + + + + + + +</pre> + + + + + + +<hr style="width: 65%;" /> + +<h2>THE WORKS +<br /><br /> +<span style="font-size: 71%">OF</span> +<br /><br /> +THE RIGHT HONOURABLE<br /> + +<br /> +<span style="font-size: 200%">EDMUND BURKE</span></h2> + +<h3>IN TWELVE VOLUMES<br /> +<br /> +<span style="font-size: smaller">VOLUME THE ELEVENTH</span></h3> +<p /> +<div style="text-align: center"> +<img src="images/001.png" alt="BURKE COAT OF ARMS." title="BURKE COAT OF ARMS" /> +</div> +<p /> +<p style="text-align: center; text-indent: 0"><b>London</b><br /> + +<br /> + +JOHN C. NIMMO<br /> +<br /> +14, KING WILLIAM STREET, STRAND, W.C.<br /> + +MDCCCLXXXVII<br /></p> + +<hr style="width: 65%;" /> + + +<h2><a name="CONTENTS_OF_VOL_XI" id="CONTENTS_OF_VOL_XI"></a>CONTENTS OF VOL. XI.</h2> + + +<ul class="TOCSub"><li><a href="#REPORT">REPORT FROM THE COMMITTEE OF THE HOUSE OF COMMONS, + APPOINTED TO INSPECT THE LORDS' JOURNALS IN RELATION TO + THEIR PROCEEDINGS ON THE TRIAL OF WARREN HASTINGS, + ESQUIRE. WITH AN APPENDIX. ALSO, REMARKS IN VINDICATION + OF THE SAME FROM THE ANIMADVERSIONS OF LORD THURLOW. 1794.</a> <span class="tocright"><a href="#Page_1">1</a></span></li> + +<li><a href="#SPEECHES">SPEECHES IN THE IMPEACHMENT OF WARREN HASTINGS, ESQUIRE, + LATE GOVERNOR-GENERAL OF BENGAL. (CONTINUED.)</a></li> + +<li><ul class="TOCSub"><li> <a href="#SPEECHES">SPEECH IN GENERAL REPLY.</a></li> +<li><ul class="TOCSub"><li> <a href="#FIRST_DAY_WEDNESDAY_MAY_28_1794">FIRST DAY: WEDNESDAY, MAY 28, 1794</a> <span class="tocright"><a href="#Page_157">157</a></span></li> +<li> <a href="#SECOND_DAY_FRIDAY_MAY_30_1794">SECOND DAY: FRIDAY, MAY 30</a> <span class="tocright"><a href="#Page_227">227</a></span></li> +<li> <a href="#THIRD_DAY_TUESDAY_JUNE_3_1794">THIRD DAY: TUESDAY, JUNE 3</a> <span class="tocright"><a href="#Page_300">300</a></span></li> +<li> <a href="#FOURTH_DAY_THURSDAY_JUNE_5_1794">FOURTH DAY: THURSDAY, JUNE 5</a> <span class="tocright"><a href="#Page_372">372</a></span></li></ul></li></ul></li></ul> + + + + +<p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_1" id="Page_1">{1}</a></span></p> +<hr style="width: 65%;" /> +<h2><a name="REPORT" id="REPORT"></a>REPORT<br /> +<br /> +<span style="font-size: 50%;">FROM THE</span><br /> +<br /> +COMMITTEE OF THE HOUSE OF COMMONS,<br /> +<br /> +<span style="font-size: 50%;">APPOINTED</span><br /> +<br /> +<span style="font-size: 80%;">TO INSPECT THE LORDS' JOURNALS</span><br /> +<br /> +<span style="font-size: 65%;">IN RELATION TO THEIR PROCEEDINGS +ON THE TRIAL OF<br /></span> +<br /> +<span style="font-size: 80%;">WARREN HASTINGS, ESQUIRE.</span><br /> +<br /> +<span style="font-size: 65%;">WITH AN APPENDIX.</span><br /> +<br /> +<span style="font-size: 50%;">ALSO,</span><br /> +<br /> +<span style="font-size: 65%;">REMARKS IN VINDICATION OF THE SAME FROM THE +ANIMADVERSIONS OF LORD THURLOW.</span><br /> +<br /> +<span style="font-size: 65%;">1794.</span></h2> + +<p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_2" id="Page_2">{2}</a></span></p> + + + +<hr style="width: 65%;" /> +<h2>NOTE.</h2> + + +<div class="blockquote"><p>In the sixth article Mr. Burke was supported, on the 16th of +February, 1790, by Mr. Anstruther, who opened the remaining +part of this article and part of the seventh article, and the evidence +was summed up and enforced by him. The rest of the +evidence upon the sixth, and on part of the seventh, eighth, and +fourteenth articles, were respectively opened and enforced by +Mr. Fox and other of the Managers, on the 7th and 9th of +June, in the same session. On the 23d May, 1791, Mr. St. +John opened the fourth article of charge; and evidence was +heard in support of the same. In the following sessions of +1792, Mr. Hastings's counsel were heard in his defence, which +was continued through the whole of the sessions of 1793.</p> + +<p>On the 5th of March, 1794, a select committee was appointed +by the House of Commons to inspect the Lords' Journals, +in relation to their proceeding on the trial of Warren +Hastings, Esquire, and to report what they found therein to +the House, (which committee were the managers appointed +to make good the articles of impeachment against the said +Warren Hastings, Esquire,) and who were afterwards instructed +to report the several matters which had occurred since the +commencement of the prosecution, and which had, in their +opinion, contributed to the duration thereof to that time, with +their observations thereupon. On the 30th of April, the following +Report, written by Mr. Burke, and adopted by the Committee, +was presented to the House of Commons, and ordered +by the House to be printed.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_3" id="Page_3">{3}</a></span></p></div> + + + +<hr style="width: 65%;" /> +<h2>REPORT</h2> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>Made on the 30th April, 1794, from the Committee of the +House of Commons, appointed to inspect the Lords' Journals, +in relation to their proceeding on the trial of Warren +Hastings, Esquire, and to report what they find +therein to the House (which committee were the managers +appointed to make good the articles of impeachment +against the said Warren Hastings, Esquire); and who +were afterwards instructed to report the several matters +which have occurred since the commencement of the said +prosecution, and which have, in their opinion, contributed +to the duration thereof to the present time, with their +observations thereupon.</p></div> + + +<p>Your Committee has received two powers from +the House:—The first, on the 5th of March, +1794, to inspect the Lords' Journals, in relation to +their proceedings on the trial of Warren Hastings, +Esquire, and to report what they find therein to the +House. The second is an instruction, given on the +17th day of the same month of March, to this effect: +That your Committee do report to this House the +several matters which have occurred since the commencement +of the said prosecution, and which have, +in their opinion, contributed to the duration thereof +to the present time, with their observations thereupon.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_4" id="Page_4">{4}</a></span></p> + +<p>Your Committee is sensible that the duration of +the said trial, and the causes of that duration, as well +as the matters which have therein occurred, do well +merit the attentive consideration of this House. We +have therefore endeavored with all diligence to employ +the powers that have been granted and to execute +the orders that have been given to us, and to +report thereon as speedily as possible, and as fully as +the time would admit.</p> + +<p>Your Committee has considered, first, the mere +fact of the duration of the trial, which they find to +have commenced on the 13th day of February, 1788, +and to have continued, by various adjournments, to +the said 17th of March. During that period the sittings +of the Court have occupied one hundred and +eighteen days, or about one third of a year. The +distribution of the sitting days in each year is as +follows.</p> + + + +<div class='ctr'> +<table border="0" cellpadding="4" cellspacing="0" summary=""> +<tr><td align='left'></td><td align='left'></td><td align='right'>Days.</td></tr> +<tr><td align='left'>In the year</td><td align='left'>1788, the Court sat</td><td align='right'>35</td></tr> +<tr><td align='left'></td><td align='left'>1789,</td><td align='right'>17</td></tr> +<tr><td align='left'></td><td align='left'>1790,</td><td align='right'>14</td></tr> +<tr><td align='left'></td><td align='left'>1791,</td><td align='right'>5</td></tr> +<tr><td align='left'></td><td align='left'>1792,</td><td align='right'>22</td></tr> +<tr><td align='left'></td><td align='left'>1793,</td><td align='right'>22</td></tr> +<tr><td align='left'></td><td align='left'>1794, to the 1st of March, inclusive</td><td align='right'>3</td></tr> +<tr><td align='left'></td><td align='right'>Total</td><td align='right' class="bt">118</td></tr> +</table></div> + + +<p>Your Committee then proceeded to consider the +causes of this duration, with regard to time as measured +by the calendar, and also as measured by the +number of days occupied in actual sitting. They +find, on examining the duration of the trial with ref<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_5" id="Page_5">{5}</a></span>erence +to the number of years which it has lasted, +that it has been owing to several prorogations and to +one dissolution of Parliament; to discussions which +are supposed to have arisen in the House of Peers on +the legality of the continuance of impeachments from +Parliament to Parliament; that it has been owing to +the number and length of the adjournments of the +Court, particularly the adjournments on account of +the Circuit, which adjournments were interposed in +the middle of the session, and the most proper time +for business; that it has been owing to one adjournment +made in consequence of a complaint of the +prisoner against one of your Managers, which took +up a space of ten days; that two days' adjournments +were made on account of the illness of certain of the +Managers; and, as far as your Committee can judge, +two sitting days were prevented by the sudden and +unexpected dereliction of the defence of the prisoner +at the close of the last session, your Managers not +having been then ready to produce their evidence in +reply, nor to make their observations on the evidence +produced by the prisoner's counsel, as they expected +the whole to have been gone through before they were +called on for their reply. In this session your Committee +computes that the trial was delayed about a +week or ten days. The Lords waited for the recovery +of the Marquis Cornwallis, the prisoner wishing +to avail himself of the testimony of that noble person.</p> + +<p>With regard to the one hundred and eighteen days +employed in actual sitting, the distribution of the +business was in the manner following.</p> + +<p>There were spent,<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_6" id="Page_6">{6}</a></span>—</p> + + + +<div class='ctr'> +<table border="0" cellpadding="4" cellspacing="0" summary=""> +<tr><td align='left'></td><td align='left'>Days</td></tr> +<tr><td align='left'>In reading the articles of impeachment, and the +defendant's answer, and in debate on the mode +of proceeding</td><td align='right'>3</td></tr> +<tr><td align='left'>Opening speeches, and summing up by the Managers</td><td align='right'>19</td></tr> +<tr><td align='left'>Documentary and oral evidence by the Managers</td><td align='right'>51</td></tr> +<tr><td align='left'>Opening speeches and summing up by the defendant's +counsel, and defendant's addresses to the Court</td><td align='right'>22</td></tr> +<tr><td align='left'>Documentary and oral evidence on the part of the defendant</td><td align='right'>23</td></tr> +<tr><td align='left'></td><td align='right' class="bt"> 118</td></tr> +</table></div> + + +<p>The other head, namely, that the trial has occupied +one hundred and eighteen days, or nearly one +third of a year. This your Committee conceives to +have arisen from the following immediate causes. +First, the nature and extent of the matter to be +tried. Secondly, the general nature and quality of +the evidence produced: it was principally documentary +evidence, contained in papers of great length, +the whole of which was often required to be read +when brought to prove a single short fact. Under +the head of evidence must be taken into consideration +the number and description of the witnesses examined +and cross-examined. Thirdly, and principally, +the duration of the trial is to be attributed to +objections taken by the prisoner's counsel to the admissibility +of several documents and persons offered +as evidence on the part of the prosecution. These +objections amounted to sixty-two: they gave rise to +several debates, and to twelve references from the +Court to the Judges. On the part of the Mana<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_7" id="Page_7">{7}</a></span>gers, +the number of objections was small; the debates +upon, them were short; there was not upon them +any reference to the Judges; and the Lords did not +even retire upon any of them to the Chamber of Parliament.</p> + +<p>This last cause of the number of sitting days your +Committee considers as far more important than all +the rest. The questions upon the admissibility of +evidence, the manner in which these questions were +stated and were decided, the modes of proceeding, the +great uncertainty of the principle upon which evidence +in that court is to be admitted or rejected,—all +these appear to your Committee materially to affect +the constitution of the House of Peers as a court +of judicature, as well as its powers, and the purposes +it was intended to answer in the state. The Peers +have a valuable interest in the conservation of their +own lawful privileges. But this interest is not confined +to the Lords. The Commons ought to partake +in the advantage of the judicial rights and privileges +of that high court. Courts are made for the suitors, +and not the suitors for the court. The conservation +of all other parts of the law, the whole indeed of +the rights and liberties of the subject, ultimately +depends upon the preservation of the Law of Parliament +in its original force and authority.</p> + +<p>Your Committee had reason to entertain apprehensions +that certain proceedings in this trial may possibly +limit and weaken the means of carrying on any +future impeachment of the Commons. As your +Committee felt these apprehensions strongly, they +thought it their duty to begin with humbly submitting +facts and observations on the proceedings concerning +evidence to the consideration of this House,<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_8" id="Page_8">{8}</a></span> +before they proceed to state the other matters which +come within the scope of the directions which they +have received.</p> + +<p>To enable your Committee the better to execute +the task imposed upon them in carrying on the impeachment +of this House, and to find some principle +on which they were to order and regulate their conduct +therein, they found it necessary to look attentively +to the jurisdiction of the court in which they +were to act for this House, and into its laws and +rules of proceeding, as well as into the rights and +powers of the House of Commons in their impeachments.</p> + + +<h3>RELATION OF THE JUDGES, ETC., TO THE COURT OF +PARLIAMENT.</h3> + +<p>Upon examining into the course of proceeding in +the House of Lords, and into the relation which +exists between the Peers, on the one hand, and their +attendants and assistants, the Judges of the Realm, +Barons of the Exchequer of the Coif, the King's +learned counsel, and the Civilians Masters of the +Chancery, on the other, it appears to your Committee +that these Judges, and other persons learned in the +Common and Civil Laws, are no integrant and necessary +part of that court. Their writs of summons are +essentially different; and it does not appear that they +or any of them have, or of right ought to have, a +deliberative voice, either actually or virtually, in the +judgments given in the High Court of Parliament. +Their attendance in that court is solely ministerial; +and their answers to questions put to them are not +to be regarded as declaratory of the Law of Parliament, +but are merely consultory responses, in order<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_9" id="Page_9">{9}</a></span> +to furnish such matter (to be submitted to the judgment +of the Peers) as may be useful in reasoning by +analogy, so far as the nature of the rules in the respective +courts of the learned persons consulted shall +appear to the House to be applicable to the nature +and circumstances of the case before them, and no +otherwise.<a name="FNanchor_1_1" id="FNanchor_1_1"></a><a href="#Footnote_1_1" class="fnanchor" title=" 4 Inst. p. 4.">[1]</a></p> + + +<h3>JURISDICTION OF THE LORDS.</h3> + +<p>Your Committee finds, that, in all impeachments +of the Commons of Great Britain for high crimes +and misdemeanors before the Peers in the High +Court of Parliament, the Peers are not triers or +jurors only, but, by the ancient laws and constitution +of this kingdom, known by constant usage, +are judges both of law and fact; and we conceive +that the Lords are bound not to act in such a +manner as to give rise to an opinion that they +have virtually submitted to a division of their legal +powers, or that, putting themselves into the situation +of mere triers or jurors, they may suffer the evidence +in the cause to be produced or not produced before +them, according to the discretion of the judges of +the inferior courts.</p> + + +<h3>LAW OF PARLIAMENT.</h3> + +<p>Your Committee finds that the Lords, in matter +of appeal or impeachment in Parliament, are not of +right obliged to proceed according to the course or +rules of the Roman Civil Law, or by those of the law +or usage of any of the inferior courts in Westminster +Hall, but by the law and usage of Parliament. And<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_10" id="Page_10">{10}</a></span> +your Committee finds that this has been declared in +the most clear and explicit manner by the House of +Lords, in the year of our Lord 1387 and 1388, in the +11th year of King Richard II.</p> + +<p>Upon an appeal in Parliament then depending +against certain great persons, peers and commoners, +the said appeal was referred to the Justices, and other +learned persons of the law. "At which time," it is +said in the record, that "the Justices and Serjeants, +and others the learned in the Law Civil, were charged, +by order of the King our sovereign aforesaid, to give +their faithful counsel to the Lords of the Parliament +concerning the due proceedings in the cause of the +appeal aforesaid. The which Justices, Serjeants, and +the learned in the law of the kingdom, and also the +learned in the Law Civil, have taken the same into +deliberation, and have answered to the said Lords of +Parliament, that they had seen and well considered +the tenor of the said appeal; and they say that the +same appeal was neither made nor pleaded according +to the order which the one law or the other requires. +Upon which the said Lords of Parliament have taken +the same into deliberation and consultation, and by +the assent of our said Lord the King, and of their +common agreement, it was declared, that, in so high +a crime as that which is charged in this appeal, which +touches the person of our lord the King, and the state +of the whole kingdom, perpetrated by persons who +are peers of the kingdom, along with others, the +cause shall not be tried in any other place but in +Parliament, nor by any other law than the law and +course of Parliament; and that it belongeth to the +Lords of Parliament, and to their franchise and liberty +by the ancient custom of the Parliament, to be<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_11" id="Page_11">{11}</a></span> +judges in such cases, and in these cases to judge by +the assent of the King; and thus it shall be done in +this case, by the award of Parliament: because the +realm of England has not been heretofore, nor is it +the intention of our said lord the King and the Lords +of Parliament that it ever should be governed by the +Law Civil; and also, it is their resolution not to rule +or govern so high a cause as this appeal is, which +cannot be tried anywhere but in Parliament, as hath +been said before, by the course, process, and order +used in any courts or place inferior in the same kingdom; +which courts and places are not more than +the executors of the ancient laws and customs of the +kingdom, and of the ordinances and establishments of +Parliament. It was determined by the said Lords of +Parliament, by the assent of our said lord the King, +that this appeal was made and pleaded well and sufficiently, +and that the process upon it is good and +effectual, according to the law and course of Parliament; +and for such they decree and adjudge it."<a name="FNanchor_2_2" id="FNanchor_2_2"></a><a href="#Footnote_2_2" class="fnanchor" title=" Rol. Parl. Vol. III. p. 244, § 7.">[2]</a></p> + +<p>And your Committee finds, that toward the close +of the same Parliament the same right was again +claimed and admitted as the special privilege of the +Peers, in the following manner:—"In this Parliament, +all the Lords then present, Spiritual as well as +Temporal, claimed as their franchise, that the weighty +matters moved in this Parliament, and which shall be +moved in other Parliaments in future times, touching +the peers of the land, shall be managed, adjudged, +and discussed by the course of Parliament, and in no +sort by the Law Civil, or by the common law of the +land, used in the other lower courts of the kingdom; +which claim, liberty, and franchise the King gra<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_12" id="Page_12">{12}</a></span>ciously +allowed and granted to them in full Parliament."<a name="FNanchor_2" id="FNanchor_2"></a><a href="#Footnote_2_2" class="fnanchor" title=" Rol. Parl. Vol. III. p. 244, § 7.">[2]</a></p> + +<p>Your Committee finds that the Commons, having +at that time considered the appeal above mentioned, +approved the proceedings in it, and, as far as +in them lay, added the sanction of their accusation +against the persons who were the objects of the appeal. +They also, immediately afterwards, impeached all the +Judges of the Common Pleas, the Chief Baron of the +Exchequer, and other learned and eminent persons, +both peers and commoners; upon the conclusion of +which impeachments it was that the second claim was +entered. In all the transactions aforesaid the Commons +were acting parties; yet neither then nor ever +since have they made any objection or protestation, +that the rule laid down by the Lords in the beginning +of the session of 1388 ought not to be applied +to the impeachments of commoners as well as peers. +In many cases they have claimed the benefit of this +rule; and in all cases they have acted, and the Peers +have determined, upon the same general principles. +The Peers have always supported the same franchises; +nor are there any precedents upon the records of Parliament +subverting either the general rule or the particular +privilege, so far as the same relates either to +the course of proceeding or to the rule of law by +which the Lords are to judge.</p> + +<p>Your Committee observes also, that, in the commissions +to the several Lords High Stewards who have +been appointed on the trials of peers impeached by +the Commons, the proceedings are directed to be had +according to the law and custom of the kingdom, +<i>and the custom of Parliament</i>: which words are not<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_13" id="Page_13">{13}</a></span> +to be found in the commissions for trying upon indictments.</p> + +<p>"As every court of justice," says Lord Coke, "hath +laws and customs for its direction, some by the Common +Law, some by the Civil and Canon Law, some +by peculiar laws and customs, &c., so the High Court +of Parliament <i>suis propriis legibus et consuetudinibus +subsistit</i>. It is by the <i>Lex et Consuetudo Parliamenti</i>, +that all weighty matters in any Parliament moved, +concerning the peers of the realm, or Commons in +Parliament assembled, ought to be determined, adjudged, +and discussed, by the course of the Parliament, +and not by the Civil Law, nor yet by the common +laws of this realm used in more inferior courts." +And after founding himself on this very precedent of +the 11th of Richard II., he adds, <i>"This is the reason +that Judges ought not to give any opinion of a matter of +Parliament, because it is not to be decided by the common +laws, but secundum Legem et Consuetudinem Parliamenti: +and so the Judges in divers Parliaments have +confessed!"</i><a name="FNanchor_3_3" id="FNanchor_3_3"></a><a href="#Footnote_3_3" class="fnanchor" title=" 4 Inst. p. 15.">[3]</a></p> + + +<h3>RULE OF PLEADING.</h3> + +<p>Your Committee do not find that any rules of +pleading, as observed in the inferior courts, have ever +obtained in the proceedings of the High Court of +Parliament, in a cause or matter in which the whole +procedure has been within their original jurisdiction. +Nor does your Committee find that any demurrer or +exception, as of false or erroneous pleading, hath been +ever admitted to any impeachment in Parliament, as +not coming within the form of the pleading; and although +a reservation or protest is made by the defend<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_14" id="Page_14">{14}</a></span>ant +(matter of form, as we conceive) "to the generality, +uncertainty, and insufficiency of the articles of +impeachment," yet no objections have in fact been +ever made in any part of the record; and when verbally +they have been made, (until this trial,) they +have constantly been overruled.</p> + +<p>The trial of Lord Strafford<a name="FNanchor_4_4" id="FNanchor_4_4"></a><a href="#Footnote_4_4" class="fnanchor" title=" 16 Ch. I. 1640.">[4]</a> is one of the most +important eras in the history of Parliamentary judicature. +In that trial, and in the dispositions made +preparatory to it, the process on impeachments was, +on great consideration, research, and selection of precedents, +brought very nearly to the form which it retains +at this day; and great and important parts of +Parliamentary Law were then laid down. The Commons +at that time made new charges or amended +the old as they saw occasion. Upon an application +from the Commons to the Lords, that the examinations +taken by their Lordships, at their request, might +be delivered to them, for the purpose of a more exact +specification of the charge they had made, on delivering +the message of the Commons, Mr. Pym, amongst +other things, said, as it is entered in the Lords' Journals, +"According to the clause of reservation in the +conclusion of their charge, they [the Commons] will +add to the charges, not to the matter in respect of +comprehension, extent, or kind, but only to reduce +them to more particularities, that the Earl of Strafford +might answer with the more clearness and expedition: +<i>not that they are bound by this way of +SPECIAL charge; and therefore they have taken care +in their House, upon protestation, that this shall be no +prejudice to bind them from proceeding in GENERAL +in other cases, and that they are not to be ruled by pro<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_15" id="Page_15">{15}</a></span>ceedings +in other courts, which protestation they have +made for the preservation of the power of Parliament; +and they desire that the like care may be had in your +Lordships' House</i>."<a name="FNanchor_5_5" id="FNanchor_5_5"></a><a href="#Footnote_5_5" class="fnanchor" title=" Lords' Journals, Vol. IV. p. 133.">[5]</a> This protestation is entered on +the Lords' Journals. Thus careful were the Commons +that no exactness used by them for a temporary +accommodation, should become an example derogatory +to the larger rights of Parliamentary process.</p> + +<p>At length the question of their being obliged to +conform to any of the rules below came to a formal +judgment. In the trial of Dr. Sacheverell, March +10th, 1709, the Lord Nottingham "desired their +Lordships' opinion, whether he might propose a +question to the Judges <i>here</i> [in Westminster Hall]. +Thereupon the Lords, being moved to adjourn, adjourned +to the House of Lords, and on debate," as +appears by a note, "it was agreed that the question +should be proposed in Westminster Hall."<a name="FNanchor_6_6" id="FNanchor_6_6"></a><a href="#Footnote_6_6" class="fnanchor" title=" Id. Vol. XIX. p. 98.">[6]</a> Accordingly, +when the Lords returned the same day into the +Hall, the question was put by Lord Nottingham, and +stated to the Judges by the Lord Chancellor: "Whether, +by the <i>law of England</i>, and constant practice in all +prosecutions by <i>indictment and information</i> for crimes +and misdemeanors by writing or speaking, the particular +words supposed to be written or spoken must not +be expressly specified in the indictment or information?" +On this question the Judges, <i>seriatim</i>, and +in open court, delivered their opinion: the substance +of which was, "That, by the laws of England, and +the constant practice in Westminster Hall, the words +ought to be expressly specified in the indictment or +information." Then the Lords adjourned, and did<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_16" id="Page_16">{16}</a></span> +not come into the Hall until the 20th. In the intermediate +time they came to resolutions on the matter +of the question put to the Judges. Dr. Sacheverell, +being found guilty, moved in arrest of judgment upon +two points. The first, which he grounded on the +opinion of the Judges, and which your Committee +thinks most to the present purpose, was, "That no +entire clause, or sentence, or expression, in either of +his sermons or dedications, is particularly set forth in +his impeachment, which he has already heard the +Judges declare to be necessary in all cases of indictments +or informations."<a name="FNanchor_7_7" id="FNanchor_7_7"></a><a href="#Footnote_7_7" class="fnanchor" title=" Lords' Journals, Vol. XIX. p. 116.">[7]</a> On this head of objection, +the Lord Chancellor, on the 23d of March, agreeably +to the resolutions of the Lords of the 14th and +16th of March, acquainted Dr. Sacheverell, "That, +on occasion of the question before put to the Judges +<i>in Westminster Hall</i>, and their answer thereto, their +Lordships had fully debated and considered of that +matter, and had come to the following resolution: +'That this House will proceed to the determination +of the impeachment of Dr. Henry Sacheverell, according +to the <i>law of the land, and the law and usage +of Parliament</i>.' And afterwards to this resolution: +'That, by <i>the law and usage of Parliament</i> in prosecutions +for high crimes and misdemeanors by writing +or speaking, the particular words supposed to be +criminal are <i>not necessary</i> to be expressly specified +in such impeachment.' So that, in their Lordships' +opinion, the law and usage of the High Court of +Parliament being <i>a part of the law of the land</i>, and +that usage not requiring that words should be exactly +specified in impeachments, the answer of the +Judges, which related only to the course of <i>indictments<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_17" id="Page_17">{17}</a></span> +and informations</i>, does not in the least affect +your case."<a name="FNanchor_8_8" id="FNanchor_8_8"></a><a href="#Footnote_8_8" class="fnanchor" title=" Lords' Journals, Vol. XIX. p. 121.">[8]</a></p> + +<p>On this solemn judgment concerning the law and +usage of Parliament, it is to be remarked: First, that +the impeachment itself is not to be presumed inartificially +drawn. It appears to have been the work of +some of the greatest lawyers of the time, who were +perfectly versed in the manner of pleading in the +courts below, and would naturally have imitated their +course, if they had not been justly fearful of setting +an example which might hereafter subject the plainness +and simplicity of a Parliamentary proceeding to +the technical subtilties of the inferior courts. Secondly, +that the question put to the Judges, and their +answer, were strictly confined to the law and practice +below; and that nothing in either had a tendency +to their delivering an opinion concerning Parliament, +its laws, its usages, its course of proceeding, or its +powers. Thirdly, that the motion in arrest of judgment, +grounded on the opinion of the Judges, was +made only by Dr. Sacheverell himself, and not by his +counsel, men of great skill and learning, who, if they +thought the objections had any weight, would undoubtedly +have made and argued them.</p> + +<p>Here, as in the case of the 11th King Richard II., +the Judges declared unanimously, that such an objection +would be fatal to such a pleading in any indictment +or information; but the Lords, as on the former +occasion, overruled this objection, and held the article +to be good and valid, notwithstanding the report +of the Judges concerning the mode of proceeding in +the courts below.</p> + +<p>Your Committee finds that a protest, with reasons<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_18" id="Page_18">{18}</a></span> +at large, was entered by several lords against this determination +of their court.<a name="FNanchor_9_9" id="FNanchor_9_9"></a><a href="#Footnote_9_9" class="fnanchor" title=" Lords' Journals, Vol. XIX. p. 108.">[9]</a> It is always an advantage +to those who protest, that their reasons appear +upon record; whilst the reasons of the majority, who +determine the question, do not appear. This would +be a disadvantage of such importance as greatly to +impair, if not totally to destroy, the effect of precedent +as authority, if the reasons which prevailed were not +justly presumed to be more valid than those which +have been obliged to give way: the former having +governed the final and conclusive decision of a competent +court. But your Committee, combining the +fact of this decision with the early decision just quoted, +and with the total absence of any precedent of +an objection, before that time or since, allowed to +pleading, or what has any relation to the rules and +principles of pleading, as used in Westminster Hall, +has no doubt that the House of Lords was governed +in the 9th of Anne by the very same principles which +it had solemnly declared in the 11th of Richard II.</p> + +<p>But besides the presumption in favor of the reasons +which must be supposed to have produced this solemn +judgment of the Peers, contrary to the practice of the +courts below, as declared by all the Judges, it is probable +that the Lords were unwilling to take a step +which might admit that anything in that practice +should be received as their rule. It must be observed, +however, that the reasons against the article +alleged in the protest were by no means solely bottomed +in the practice of the courts below, as if the +main reliance of the protesters was upon that usage. +The protesting minority maintained that it was not +agreeable to <i>several precedents in Parliament</i>; of which<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_19" id="Page_19">{19}</a></span> +they cited many in favor of their opinion. It appears +by the Journals, that the clerks were ordered to +search for precedents, and a committee of peers was +appointed to inspect the said precedents, and to report +upon them,—and that they did inspect and report +accordingly. But the report is not entered on the +Journals. It is, however, to be presumed that the +greater number and the better precedents supported +the judgment. Allowing, however, their utmost force +to the precedents there cited, they could serve only +to prove, that, in the case of <i>words</i>, (to which alone, +and not the case of a <i>written</i> libel, the precedents +extended,) such a special averment, according to the +tenor of the words, had been used; but not that it +was necessary, or that ever any plea had been rejected +upon such an objection. As to the course of +Parliament, resorted to for authority in this part of +the protest, the argument seems rather to affirm than +to deny the general proposition, that its own course, +and not that of the inferior courts, had been the rule +and law of Parliament.</p> + +<p>As to the objection, taken in the protest, drawn +from natural right, the Lords knew, and it appears +in the course of the proceeding, that the whole of +the libel had been read at length, as appears from +p. 655 to p. 666.<a name="FNanchor_10_10" id="FNanchor_10_10"></a><a href="#Footnote_10_10" class="fnanchor" title=" State Trials, Vol. V.">[10]</a> So that Dr. Sacheverell had <i>substantially</i> +the same benefit of anything which could +be alleged in the extenuation or exculpation as if his +libellous sermons had been entered <i>verbatim</i> upon the +recorded impeachment. It was adjudged sufficient +to state the crime <i>generally</i> in the impeachment. +The libels were given <i>in evidence</i>; and it was not +then thought of, that nothing should be given in<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_20" id="Page_20">{20}</a></span> +evidence which was not specially charged in the impeachment.</p> + +<p>But whatever their reasons were, (great and grave +they were, no doubt,) such as your Committee has +stated it is the <i>judgment</i> of the Peers on the Law +of Parliament, as a part of the law of the land. +It is the more forcible as concurring with the judgment +in the 11th of Richard II., and with the total +silence of the Rolls and Journals concerning any +objection to pleading ever being suffered to vitiate +an impeachment, or to prevent evidence being given +upon it, on account of its generality, or any other +failure.</p> + +<p>Your Committee do not think it probable, that, +even before this adjudication, the rules of pleading +below could ever have been adopted in a Parliamentary +proceeding, when it is considered that the several +statutes of Jeofails, not less than twelve in number,<a name="FNanchor_11_11" id="FNanchor_11_11"></a><a href="#Footnote_11_11" class="fnanchor" title=" Statutes at Large, from 12 Ed. I. to 16 and 17 Ch. II.">[11]</a> +have been made for the correction of an over-strictness +in pleading, to the prejudice of substantial +justice: yet in no one of these is to be discovered +the least mention of any proceeding in Parliament. +There is no doubt that the legislature would have +applied its remedy to that grievance in Parliamentary +proceedings, if it had found those proceedings +embarrassed with what Lord Mansfield, from the +bench, and speaking of the matter of these statutes, +very justly calls "disgraceful subtilties."</p> + +<p>What is still more strong to the point, your Committee +finds that in the 7th of William III. an act +was made for the regulating of trials for treason and +misprision of treason, containing several regulations +for reformation of proceedings at law, both as to<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_21" id="Page_21">{21}</a></span> +matters of form and substance, as well as relative +to evidence. It is an act thought most essential +to the liberty of the subject; yet in this high and +critical matter, so deeply affecting the lives, properties, +honors, and even the inheritable blood of the +subject, the legislature was so tender of the high powers +of this high court, deemed so necessary for the +attainment of the great objects of its justice, so fearful +of enervating any of its means or circumscribing +any of its capacities, even by rules and restraints +the most necessary for the inferior courts, that they +guarded against it by an express proviso, "that neither +this act, nor anything therein contained, shall +any ways extend to <i>any impeachment or other proceedings +in Parliament, in any land whatsoever</i>."<a name="FNanchor_12_12" id="FNanchor_12_12"></a><a href="#Footnote_12_12" class="fnanchor" title=" 7 W. III. ch. 3, sect. 12.">[12]</a></p> + + +<h3>CONDUCT OF THE COMMONS IN PLEADING.</h3> + +<p>This point being thus solemnly adjudged in the +case of Dr. Sacheverell, and the principles of the +judgment being in agreement with the whole course +of Parliamentary proceedings, the Managers for this +House have ever since considered it as an indispensable +duty to assert the same principle, in all its +latitude, upon all occasions on which it could come +in question,—and to assert it with an energy, zeal, +and earnestness proportioned to the magnitude and +importance of the interest of the Commons of Great +Britain in the religious observation of the rule, <i>that +the Law of Parliament, and the Law of Parliament +only, should prevail in the trial of their impeachments</i>.</p> + +<p>In the year 1715 (1 Geo. I.) the Commons thought<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_22" id="Page_22">{22}</a></span> +proper to impeach of high treason the lords who had +entered into the rebellion of that period. This was +about six years after the decision in the case of +Sacheverell. On the trial of one of these lords, (the +Lord Wintoun,<a name="FNanchor_13_13" id="FNanchor_13_13"></a><a href="#Footnote_13_13" class="fnanchor" title=" State Trials, Vol. VI. p. 17.">[13]</a>) after verdict, the prisoner moved +in arrest of judgment, and excepted against the +impeachment for error, on account of the treason +therein laid "not being described with sufficient certainty,—the +day on which the treason was committed +not having been alleged." His counsel was heard +to this point. They contended, "that the forfeitures +in cases of treason are very great, and therefore they +humbly conceived that the accusation ought to contain +all the certainty it is capable of, that the prisoner +may not by <i>general allegations</i> be rendered incapable +to defend himself in a case which may prove +fatal to him: that they would not trouble their Lordships +with citing authorities; for they believed there +is not one gentleman of the long robe but will agree +that an indictment for any capital offence to be erroneous, +if the offence be not alleged to be committed +on a certain day: that this impeachment set forth +only that in or about the months of September, October, +or November, 1715, the offence charged in +the impeachment had been committed." The counsel +argued, "that a proceeding by impeachment is a +proceeding at the Common Law, for <i>Lex Parliamentaria</i> +is a part of Common Law, and they submitted +whether there is not the same certainty required +in one method of proceeding at Common Law as in +another."</p> + +<p>The matter was argued elaborately and learnedly, +not only on the general principles of the proceedings<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_23" id="Page_23">{23}</a></span> +below, but on the inconvenience and possible hardships +attending this uncertainty. They quoted Sacheverell's +case, in whose impeachment "the precise days +were laid when the Doctor preached each of these two +sermons; and that by a like reason a certain day +ought to be laid in the impeachment when this treason +was committed; and that the authority of Dr. +Sacheverell's case seemed so much stronger than the +case in question as the crime of treason is higher than +that of a misdemeanor."</p> + +<p>Here the Managers for the Commons brought the +point a second time to an issue, and that on the +highest of capital cases: an issue, the event of which +was to determine forever whether their impeachments +were to be regulated by the law as understood and observed +in the inferior courts. Upon the usage below +there was no doubt; the indictment would unquestionably +have been quashed. But the Managers for +the Commons stood forth upon this occasion with a determined +resolution, and no less than four of them +<i>seriatim</i> rejected the doctrine contended for by Lord +Wintoun's counsel. They were all eminent members +of Parliament, and three of them great and eminent +lawyers, namely, the then Attorney-General, Sir William +Thomson, and Mr. Cowper.</p> + +<p>Mr. Walpole said,—"Those learned gentlemen +[Lord Wintoun's counsel] <i>seem to forget in what court +they are</i>. They have taken up so much of your Lordships' +time in quoting of authorities, and using arguments +to show your Lordships what would quash an +indictment in <i>the courts below</i>, that they seemed to forget +they are now in <i>a Court of Parliament, and on an +impeachment of the Commons of Great Britain</i>. For, +should the Commons admit all that they have offered,<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_24" id="Page_24">{24}</a></span> +it will not follow that the impeachment of the Commons +is insufficient; and I must observe to your +Lordships, that neither of the learned gentlemen +have offered to produce one instance relative to an +impeachment. I mean to show that the sufficiency +of an impeachment was never called in question for +the generality of the charge, or that any instance of +that nature was offered at before. The Commons +don't conceive, that, if this exception would quash +an indictment, it would therefore make the impeachment +insufficient. I hope it never will be allowed +here as a reason, that what quashes an indictment in +the courts below will make insufficient an impeachment +brought by the Commons of Great Britain."</p> + +<p>The Attorney-General supported Mr. Walpole in +affirmance of this principle. He said,—"I would +follow the steps of the learned gentleman who spoke +before me, and I think he has given a good answer +to these objections. I would take notice that we are +upon an impeachment, not upon an indictment. The +courts below have set forms to themselves, which have +prevailed for a long course of time, and thereby are +become the forms by which those courts are to govern +themselves; but it never was thought that the forms +of those courts had any influence on the proceedings +of Parliament. In Richard II.'s time, it is said in the +records of Parliament, that proceedings in Parliament +are not to be governed by the forms of Westminster +Hall. We are in the case of an impeachment, and in +the Court of Parliament. Your Lordships have already +given judgment against six upon this impeachment, +and it is warranted by the precedents in Parliament; +therefore we insist that the articles are good +in substance."<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_25" id="Page_25">{25}</a></span></p> + +<p>Mr. Cowper.—"They [the counsel] cannot but +know that the usages of Parliaments are part of the +laws of the land, although they differ in many instances +from the Common Law, as practised in the inferior +courts, in point of form. My Lords, if the Commons, +in preparing articles of impeachment, should govern +themselves by precedents of indictments, in my humble +opinion they would depart from the ancient, nay, +the constant, usage and practice of Parliament. It +is well known that the form of an impeachment has +very little resemblance to that of an indictment; and +I believe the Commons will endeavor to preserve the +difference, by adhering to their own precedents."</p> + +<p>Sir William Thomson.—"We must refer to the +forms and proceedings in the Court of Parliament, +and which must be owned to be part of the law of the +land. It has been mentioned already to your Lordships, +that the precedents in impeachments are not so +nice and precise in form as in the inferior courts; and +we presume your Lordships will be governed by the +forms of your own court, (especially forms that are +not essential to justice,) as the courts below are by +theirs: which courts differ one from the other in many +respects as to their forms of proceedings, and the +practice of each court is esteemed as the law of that +court."</p> + +<p>The Attorney-General in reply maintained his first +doctrine. "There is no uncertainty; in it <i>that can +be to the prejudice of the prisoner</i>: we insist, it is according +to <i>the forms of Parliament</i>: he has pleaded +to it, and your Lordships have found him guilty."</p> + +<p>The opinions of the Judges were taken in the House +of Lords, on the 19th of March, 1715, upon two questions +which had been argued in arrest of judgment,<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_26" id="Page_26">{26}</a></span> +grounded chiefly on the practice of the courts below. +To the first the Judges answered,—"<i>It is necessary</i> +that there be a <i>certain</i> day laid in such indictments, +on which the fact is alleged to be committed; and that +alleging in such indictments that the fact was committed +at or about a certain day would not be sufficient." +To the second they answered, "that, although a day +certain, when the fact is supposed to be done, be alleged +in such indictments, yet it is not necessary upon +the trial to prove the fact to be committed upon <i>that +day</i>; but it is sufficient, if proved to be done <i>on any +other day before</i> the indictment found."</p> + +<p>Then it was "agreed by the House, and ordered, +that the Lord High Steward be directed to acquaint +the prisoner at the bar in Westminster Hall, 'that +the Lords have considered of the matters moved in +arrest of judgment, and are of opinion that they are +not sufficient to arrest the same, but that the <i>impeachment</i> +is sufficiently certain in point of time +<i>according to the form of impeachments in Parliament</i>.'"<a name="FNanchor_14_14" id="FNanchor_14_14"></a><a href="#Footnote_14_14" class="fnanchor" title=" Lords' Journals, Vol. XX. p. 316.">[14]</a></p> + +<p>On this final adjudication, (given after solemn argument, +and after taking the opinion of the Judges,) +in affirmance of the Law of Parliament against the +undisputed usage of the courts below, your Committee +has to remark,—1st, The preference of the +custom of Parliament to the usage below. By the +very latitude of the charge, the Parliamentary accusation +gives the prisoner fair notice to prepare himself +upon all points: whereas there seems something +insnaring in the proceedings upon indictment, which, +fixing the specification of a day certain for the treason +or felony as absolutely necessary in the charge,<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_27" id="Page_27">{27}</a></span> +gives notice for preparation only on <i>that day</i>, whilst +the prosecutor has the whole range of time antecedent +to the indictment to allege and give evidence +of facts against the prisoner. It has been usual, +particularly in later indictments, to add, "at several +other times"; but the strictness of naming one +day is still necessary, and the want of the larger +words would not quash the indictment. 2dly, A comparison +of the extreme rigor and exactness required +in the more <i>formal</i> part of the proceeding (the indictment) +with the extreme laxity used in the <i>substantial</i> +part (that is to say, the evidence received +to prove the fact) fully demonstrates that the partisans +of those forms would put shackles on the High +Court of Parliament, with which they are not willing, +or find it wholly impracticable, to bind themselves. +3dly, That the latitude of departure from the letter +of the indictment (which holds in other matters besides +this) is in appearance much more contrary to +natural justice than anything which has been objected +against the evidence offered by your Managers, under +a pretence that it exceeded the limits of pleading. +For, in the case of indictments below, it must be +admitted that the prisoner may be unprovided with +proof of an alibi, and other material means of defence, +or may find some matters unlooked-for produced +against him, by witnesses utterly unknown to +him: whereas nothing was offered to be given in +evidence, under any of the articles of this impeachment, +except such as the prisoner must have had +perfect knowledge of; the whole consisting of matters +sent over by himself to the Court of Directors, and +authenticated under his own hand. No substantial +injustice or hardship of any kind could arise from<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_28" id="Page_28">{28}</a></span> +our evidence under our pleading: whereas in theirs +very great and serious inconveniencies might happen.</p> + +<p>Your Committee has further to observe, that, in +the case of Lord Wintoun, as in the case of Dr. +Sacheverell, the Commons had in their Managers +persons abundantly practised in the law, as used in +the inferior jurisdictions, who could easily have followed +the precedents of indictments, if they had not +purposely, and for the best reasons, avoided such +precedents.</p> + +<p>A great writer on the criminal law, Justice Foster, +in one of his Discourses,<a name="FNanchor_15_15" id="FNanchor_15_15"></a><a href="#Footnote_15_15" class="fnanchor" title=" Discourse IV. p. 389.">[15]</a> fully recognizes those principles +for which your Managers have contended, and +which have to this time been uniformly observed in +Parliament. In a very elaborate reasoning on the +case of a trial in Parliament, (the trial of those who +had murdered Edward II.,) he observes thus:—"It +is <i>well known</i>, that, in <i>Parliamentary</i> proceedings of +this kind, <i>it is, and ever was</i>, sufficient that matters +appear with proper light and certainty to <i>a common +understanding</i>, without that minute exactness which +is required in criminal proceedings in Westminster +Hall. In these cases the rule has always been, +<i>Loquendum ut vulgus</i>." And in a note he says,—"In +the proceeding against Mortimer, in this Parliament, +<i>so little regard was had to the forms used in legal proceedings</i>, +that he who had been frequently summoned +to Parliament as a baron, and had lately been created +Earl of March, is styled through the whole record +merely Roger de Mortimer."</p> + +<p>The departure from the common forms in the first +case alluded to by Foster (viz., the trial of Berkeley,<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_29" id="Page_29">{29}</a></span> +Maltravers, &c., for treason, in the murder of Edward +II.<a name="FNanchor_16_16" id="FNanchor_16_16"></a><a href="#Footnote_16_16" class="fnanchor" title=" Parl. Rolls, Vol. II. p. 57. 4 Ed. III. A.D. 1330.">[16]</a>) might be more plausibly attacked, because +they were tried, though in Parliament, by a jury of +freeholders: which circumstance might have given +occasion to justify a nearer approach to the forms +of indictments below. But no such forms were observed, +nor in the opinion of this able judge ought +they to have been observed.</p> + + +<h3>PUBLICITY OF THE JUDGES' OPINIONS.</h3> + +<p>It appears to your Committee, that, from the 30th +year of King Charles II. until the trial of Warren +Hastings, Esquire, in all trials in Parliament, as +well upon impeachments of the Commons as on indictments +brought up by <i>Certiorari</i>, when any matter +of law hath been agitated at the bar, or in the +course of trial hath been stated by any lord in the +court, it hath been the prevalent custom to state +the same in open court. Your Committee has been +able to find, since that period, no more than one precedent +(and that a precedent rather in form than in +substance) of the opinions of the Judges being taken +privately, except when the case on both sides has been +closed, and the Lords have retired to consider of +their verdict or of their judgment thereon. Upon +the soundest and best precedents, the Lords have improved +on the principles of publicity and equality, +and have called upon the parties severally to argue +the matter of law, previously to a reference to the +Judges, who, on their parts, have afterwards, <i>in open +court</i>, delivered their opinions, often by the mouth +of one of the Judges, speaking for himself and the<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_30" id="Page_30">{30}</a></span> +rest, and in their presence: and sometimes all the +Judges have delivered their opinion <i>seriatim</i>, (even +when they have been unanimous in it,) together with +their reasons upon which their opinion had been +founded. This, from the most early times, has +been the course in all judgments in the House of +Peers. Formerly even the record contained the +reasons of the decision. "The reason wherefore," +said Lord Coke, "the records of Parliaments have +been so highly extolled is, that therein is set down, +in cases of difficulty, not only the judgment and +resolution, but <i>the reasons and causes of the same</i> +by so great advice."<a name="FNanchor_17_17" id="FNanchor_17_17"></a><a href="#Footnote_17_17" class="fnanchor" title=" Coke, 4 Inst. p. 3.">[17]</a></p> + +<p>In the 30th of Charles II., during the trial of +Lord Cornwallis,<a name="FNanchor_18_18" id="FNanchor_18_18"></a><a href="#Footnote_18_18" class="fnanchor" title=" State Trials, Vol. II. p. 725. A.D. 1678.">[18]</a> on the suggestion of a question +in law to the Judges, Lord Danby demanded of the +Lord High Steward, the Earl of Nottingham, "whether +it would be proper here [in open court] to ask +the question of your Grace, or to propose it to the +Judges?" The Lord High Steward answered,—"If +your Lordships doubt of anything whereon a question +in law ariseth, the latter opinion, and the <i>better</i> +for the prisoner, is, <i>that it must be stated in the presence +of the prisoner, that he may know whether the question +be truly put</i>. It hath <i>sometimes</i> been practised otherwise, +and the Peers have sent for the Judges, and +have asked their opinion in private, and have come +back, and have given their verdict according to that +opinion; and there is scarcely a precedent of its being +otherwise done. There is a later authority in +print that doth settle the point so as I tell you, and +I do conceive <i>it ought to be followed</i>; and it being<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_31" id="Page_31">{31}</a></span> +safer for the prisoner, my humble opinion to your +Lordship is, that he ought to be present at <i>the +stating of the question</i>. Call the <i>prisoner</i>." The +prisoner, who had withdrawn, again appearing, he +said,—"My Lord Cornwallis, my Lords the Peers, +since they have withdrawn, have conceived a doubt +in some matter [of law arising upon the matter] of +fact in your case; and they have that tender regard +of a prisoner at the bar, <i>that they will not suffer a +case to be put up in his absence</i>, lest it should chance +to prejudice him by being <i>wrong stated</i>." Accordingly +the question was both put and the Judges' answer +given publicly and in his presence.</p> + +<p>Very soon after the trial of Lord Cornwallis, the +impeachment against Lord Stafford was brought to +a hearing,—that is, in the 32d of Charles II. In +that case the lord at the bar having stated a point +of law, "touching the necessity of two witnesses to +an overt act in case of treason," the Lord High Steward +told Lord Stafford, that "all the Judges that +assist them, <i>and are here in your Lordship's presence +and hearing</i>, should deliver their opinions whether +it be doubtful and disputable or not." Accordingly +the Judges delivered their opinion, and each argued +it (though they were all agreed) <i>seriatim</i> and <i>in open +court</i>. Another abstract point of law was also proposed +from the bar, on the same trial, concerning +the legal sentence in high treason; and in the same +manner the Judges on reference delivered their opinion +<i>in open court</i>; and no objection, was taken to it +as anything new or irregular.<a name="FNanchor_19_19" id="FNanchor_19_19"></a><a href="#Footnote_19_19" class="fnanchor" title=" State Trials, Vol. III. p. 212.">[19]</a></p> + +<p>In the 1st of James II. came on a remarkable trial +of a peer,—the trial of Lord Delamere. On that<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_32" id="Page_32">{32}</a></span> +occasion a question of law was stated. There also, +in conformity to the precedents and principles given +on the trial of Lord Cornwallis, and the precedent +in the impeachment of Lord Stafford, the then Lord +High Steward took care that the opinion of the +Judges should be given in open court.</p> + +<p>Precedents grounded on principles so favorable +to the fairness and equity of judicial proceedings, +given in the reigns of Charles II. and James II., were +not likely to be abandoned after the Revolution. +The first trial of a peer which we find after the +Revolution was that of the Earl of Warwick.</p> + +<p>In the case of the Earl of Warwick, 11 Will. III., +a question in law upon evidence was put to the +Judges; the statement of the question was made in +open court by the Lord High Steward, Lord Somers:—"If +there be six in company, and one of them +is killed, the other five are afterwards indicted, and +three are tried and found guilty of manslaughter, +and upon their prayers have their clergy allowed, +and the burning in the hand is respited, but not +pardoned,—whether any of the three can be a witness +on the trial of the other two?"</p> + +<p>Lord Halifax.—"I suppose your Lordships will +have the opinion of the Judges upon this point: <i>and +that must be in the presence of the prisoner</i>."</p> + +<p>Lord High Steward (Lord Somers).—"<i>It must +certainly be in the presence of the prisoner</i>, if you ask +the Judges' opinions."<a name="FNanchor_20_20" id="FNanchor_20_20"></a><a href="#Footnote_20_20" class="fnanchor" title=" State Trials, Vol. V. p. 169.">[20]</a></p> + +<p>In the same year, Lord Mohun was brought to trial +upon an indictment for murder. In this single trial +a greater number of questions was put to the Judges +in matter of law than probably was ever referred to<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_33" id="Page_33">{33}</a></span> +the Judges in all the collective body of trials, before +or since that period. That trial, therefore, furnishes +the largest body of authentic precedents in this point +to be found in the records of Parliament. The number +of questions put to the Judges in this trial was +twenty-three. They all originated from the Peers +themselves; yet the Court called upon the party's +counsel, as often as questions were proposed to be referred +to the Judges, as well as on the counsel for the +Crown, to argue every one of them <i>before</i> they went +to those learned persons. Many of the questions +accordingly were argued at the bar at great length. +The opinions were given and argued <i>in open court</i>. +Peers frequently insisted that the Judges should give +their opinions <i>seriatim</i>, which they did always publicly +in the court, with great gravity and dignity, and +greatly to the illustration of the law, as they held and +acted upon it in their own courts.<a name="FNanchor_21_21" id="FNanchor_21_21"></a><a href="#Footnote_21_21" class="fnanchor" title=" State Trials, Vol. IV. from p. 538 to 552.">[21]</a></p> + +<p>In Sacheverell's case (just cited for another purpose) +the Earl of Nottingham demanded whether he +might not propose a question of law to the Judges <i>in +open court</i>. It was agreed to; and the Judges gave +their answer <i>in open court</i>, though this was after verdict +given: and in consequence of the advantage afforded +to the prisoner in hearing <i>the opinion</i> of the +Judges, he was thereupon enabled to move in arrest +of judgment.</p> + +<p>The next precedent which your Committee finds of +a question put by the Lords, sitting as a court of judicature, +to the Judges, pending the trial, was in the +20th of George II., when Lord Balmerino, who was +tried on an indictment for high treason, having raised +a doubt whether the evidence proved him to be at the<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_34" id="Page_34">{34}</a></span> +place assigned for the overt act of treason on the day +laid in the indictment, the point was argued at the +bar by the counsel for the Crown in the prisoner's +presence, and for his satisfaction. The prisoner, on +hearing the argument, waived his objection; but the +then Lord President moving their Lordships to adjourn +to the Chamber of Parliament, the Lords adjourned +accordingly, and after some time returning +into Westminster Hall, the Lord High Steward (Lord +Hardwicke) said,—</p> + +<p>"Your Lordships were pleased, in the Chamber of +Parliament, to come to a resolution that the opinion +of the learned and reverend Judges should be taken +on the following question, namely, Whether it is necessary +that an overt act of high treason should be +proved to have been committed on the particular day +laid in the indictment? Is it your Lordships' pleasure +that the Judges do now give their opinion on +that question?"</p> + +<p>Lords.—"Ay, ay."</p> + +<p>Lord High Steward.—"My Lord Chief-Justice!"</p> + +<p>Lord Chief-Justice (Lord Chief-Justice Lee).—"The +question proposed by your Lordships is, Whether +it be necessary that an overt act of high treason +should be proved to be committed on the particular +day laid in the indictment? We are all of opinion +that it is not necessary to prove the overt act to be +committed on the particular day laid in the indictment; +but as evidence may be given of an overt act +before the day, so it may be after the day specified in +the indictment; for the day laid is circumstance and +form only, and not material in point of proof: this is +the known constant course of proceeding in trials."</p> + +<p>Here the case was made for the Judges, for the sat<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_35" id="Page_35">{35}</a></span>isfaction +of one of the Peers, after the prisoner had +waived his objection. Yet it was thought proper, as +a matter of course and of right, that the Judges should +state the question put to them in the open court, and +in presence of the prisoner,—and that in the same +open manner, and in the same presence, their answer +should be delivered.<a name="FNanchor_22_22" id="FNanchor_22_22"></a><a href="#Footnote_22_22" class="fnanchor" title=" State Trials, Vol. IX. p. 606*. Die Lunæ, 28º Julii 1746">[22]</a></p> + +<p>Your Committee concludes their precedents begun +under Lord Nottingham, and ended under Lord +Hardwicke. They are of opinion that a body of precedents +so uniform, so accordant with principle, made +in such times, and under the authority of a succession +of such great men, ought not to have been departed +from. The single precedent to the contrary, to which +your Committee has alluded above, was on the trial +of the Duchess of Kingston, in the reign of his present +Majesty. But in that instance the reasons of the +Judges were, by order of the House, delivered in +writing, and entered at length on the Journals:<a name="FNanchor_23_23" id="FNanchor_23_23"></a><a href="#Footnote_23_23" class="fnanchor" title=" Id., Vol. XI. p. 262.">[23]</a> so +that the legal principle of the decision is equally to +be found: which is not the case in any one instance +of the present impeachment.</p> + +<p>The Earl of Nottingham, in Lord Cornwallis's case, +conceived, though it was proper and agreeable to justice, +that this mode of putting questions to the Judges +and receiving their answer in public was not supported +by former precedents; but he thought a book of +authority had declared in favor of this course. Your +Committee is very sensible, that, antecedent to the +great period to which they refer, there are instances +of questions having been put to the Judges privately. +But we find the <i>principle</i> of publicity (whatever<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_36" id="Page_36">{36}</a></span> +variations from it there might be in practice) to have +been so clearly established at a more early period, +that all the Judges of England resolved in Lord Morley's +trial, in the year 1666, (about twelve years before +the observation of Lord Nottingham,) <i>on a supposition +that the trial should be actually concluded, and +the Lords retired to the Chamber of Parliament to consult +on their verdict</i>, that even in that case, (much stronger +than the observation of your Committee requires for +its support,) if their opinions should then be demanded +by the Peers, for the information of their private +conscience, yet they determined that they should be +given in public. This resolution is in itself so solemn, +and is so bottomed on constitutional principle +and legal policy, that your Committee have thought +fit to insert it <i>verbatim</i> in their Report, as they relied +upon it at the bar of the Court, when they contended +for the same publicity.</p> + +<p>"It was resolved, that, in case the Peers who are +triers, <i>after the evidence given, and the prisoner withdrawn, +and they gone to consult of the verdict</i>, should +desire to speak with any of the Judges, to have their +opinion upon any point of law, that, if the Lord +Steward spoke to us to go, we should go to them; +but when the Lords asked us any question, we should +not deliver any private opinion, but let them know <i>we +were not to deliver any private opinion without conference +with the rest of the Judges, and that to be done openly +in court; and this (notwithstanding the precedent in +the case of the Earl of Castlehaven) was thought prudent +in regard of ourselves, as well as for the avoiding suspicion +which might grow by private opinions: ALL resolutions +of Judges being ALWAYS done in public</i>."<a name="FNanchor_24_24" id="FNanchor_24_24"></a><a href="#Footnote_24_24" class="fnanchor" title=" Kelyng's Reports, p. 54.">[24]</a></p> +<p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_37" id="Page_37">{37}</a></span></p> +<p>The Judges in this resolution overruled the authority +of the precedent, which militated against the +whole spirit of their place and profession. Their +declaration was without reserve or exception, that +"<i>all</i> resolutions of the Judges are <i>always</i> done in +public." These Judges (as should be remembered +to their lasting honor) did not think it derogatory +from their dignity, nor from their duty to the House +of Lords, to take such measures concerning the publicity +of their resolutions as should secure them from +suspicion. They knew that the mere circumstance +of privacy in a judicature, where any publicity is +in use, tends to beget suspicion and jealousy. Your +Committee is of opinion that the honorable policy of +avoiding suspicion by avoiding privacy is not lessened +by anything which exists in the present time +and in the present trial.</p> + +<p>Your Committee has here to remark, that this +learned Judge seemed to think the case of Lord +Audley (Castlehaven) to be more against him than +in truth it was. The precedents were as follow. +The opinions of the Judges were taken three times: +the first time by the Attorney-General at Serjeants' +Inn, antecedent to the trial; the last time, after the +Peers had retired to consult on their verdict; the +middle time <i>was during the trial itself</i>: and here the +opinion was taken in open court, agreeably to what +your Committee contends to have been the usage ever +since this resolution of the Judges.<a name="FNanchor_25_25" id="FNanchor_25_25"></a><a href="#Footnote_25_25" class="fnanchor" title=" Rushworth, Vol. II. pp. 93, 94, 95, 100.">[25]</a> What was +done before seemed to have passed <i>sub silentio</i>, and +possibly through mere inadvertence.</p> + +<p>Your Committee observes, that the precedents by +them relied on were furnished from times in which<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_38" id="Page_38">{38}</a></span> +the judicial proceedings in Parliament, and in all our +courts, had obtained a very regular form. They were +furnished at a period in which Justice Blackstone +remarks that more laws were passed of importance +to the rights and liberties of the subject than in any +other. These precedents lean all one way, and carry +no marks of accommodation to the variable spirit of +the times and of political occasions. They are the +same before and after the Revolution. They are the +same through five reigns. The great men who presided +in the tribunals which furnished these examples +were in opposite political interests, but all distinguished +for their ability, integrity, and learning.</p> + +<p>The Earl of Nottingham, who was the first on the +bench to promulgate this publicity as a rule, has not +left us to seek the principle in the case: that very +learned man considers the publicity of the questions +and answers as a matter of justice, <i>and of justice favorable +to the prisoner</i>. In the case of Mr. Hastings, +the prisoner's counsel did not join your Committee +in their endeavors to obtain the publicity we demanded. +Their reasons we can only conjecture. +But your Managers, acting for this House, were +not the less bound to see that the due Parliamentary +course should be pursued, even when it is most +favorable to those whom they impeach. If it should +answer the purposes of one prisoner to waive the +rights which belong to all prisoners, it was the duty +of your Managers to protect those general rights +against that particular prisoner. It was still more +their duty to endeavor that their <i>own</i> questions +should not be erroneously stated, or cases put which +varied from those which they argued, or opinions given +in a manner not supported by the spirit of our<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_39" id="Page_39">{39}</a></span> +laws and institutions or by analogy with the practice +of all our courts.</p> + +<p>Your Committee, much in the dark about a matter +in which it was so necessary that they should receive +every light, have heard, that, in debating this matter +abroad, it has been objected, that many of the precedents +on which we most relied were furnished in the +courts of the Lord High Steward, and not in trials +where the Peers were Judges,—and that the Lord +High Steward not having it in his power to retire +with the juror Peers, the Judges' opinions, from necessity, +not from equity to the parties, were given +before that magistrate.</p> + +<p>Your Committee thinks it scarcely possible that +the Lords could be influenced by such a feeble argument. +For, admitting the fact to have been as supposed, +there is no sort of reason why so uniform a +course of precedents, in a legal court composed of a +peer for judge and peers for triers, a course so favorable +to all parties and to equal justice, a course +in concurrence with the procedure of all our other +courts, should not have the greatest authority over +their practice in every trial before <i>the whole body</i> of +the peerage.</p> + +<p>The Earl of Nottingham, who acted as High Steward +in one of these commissions, certainly knew what +he was saying. He gave no such reason. His argument +for the publicity of the Judges' opinions did not +turn at all on the nature of his court, or of his office +in that court. It rested on the equity of the principle, +and on the fair dealing due to the prisoner.</p> + +<p>Lord Somers was in no such court; yet his declaration +is full as strong. He does not, indeed, argue +the point, as the Earl of Nottingham did, when he<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_40" id="Page_40">{40}</a></span> +considered it as a new case. Lord Somers considers +it as a point quite settled, and no longer standing in +need of being supported by reason or precedent.</p> + +<p>But it is a mistake that the precedents stated in +this Report are wholly drawn from proceedings in +that kind of court. Only two are cited which are +furnished from a court constituted in the manner +supposed. The rest were in trials by all the peers, +and not by a jury of peers with an High Steward.</p> + +<p>After long discussions with the Peers on this subject, +"the Lords' committees in a conference told +them (the committee of this House, appointed to a +conference on the matter) that the High Steward is +but Speaker <i>pro tempore</i>, and giveth his vote as well +as the other lords: this changeth not the nature of +the court. And the Lords declared, that they have +power enough to proceed to trial, though the King +should not name an High Steward." On the same +day, "it is declared and ordered by the Lords Spiritual +and Temporal in Parliament assembled, that the office +of High Steward on trials of peers upon impeachments +is not necessary to the House of Peers, but that the +Lords may proceed in such trials, if an High Steward +is not appointed according to their humble desire."<a name="FNanchor_26_26" id="FNanchor_26_26"></a><a href="#Footnote_26_26" class="fnanchor" title=" Foster's Crown Law, p. 145.">[26]</a></p> + +<p>To put the matter out of all doubt, and to remove +all jealousy on the part of the Commons, the commission +of the Lord High Steward was then altered.</p> + +<p>These rights, contended for by the Commons in +their impeachments, and admitted by the Peers, were +asserted in the proceedings preparatory to the trial of +Lord Stafford, in which that long chain of uniform +precedents with regard to the publicity of the Judges' +opinions in trials begins.</p> +<p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_41" id="Page_41">{41}</a></span></p> +<p>For these last citations, and some of the remarks, +your Committee are indebted to the learned and upright +Justice Foster. They have compared them +with the Journals, and find them correct. The same +excellent author proceeds to demonstrate that whatever +he says of trials by impeachment is equally +applicable to trials before the High Steward on indictment; +and consequently, that there is no ground +for a distinction, with regard to the public declaration +of the Judges' opinions, founded on the inapplicability +of either of these cases to the other. The argument +on this whole matter is so satisfactory that your Committee +has annexed it at large to their Report.<a name="FNanchor_27_27" id="FNanchor_27_27"></a><a href="#Footnote_27_27" class="fnanchor" title=" See the Appendix, No. 1.">[27]</a> As +there is no difference in fact between these trials, +(especially since the act which provides that all the +peers shall be summoned to the trial of a peer,) so +there is no difference in the reason and principle of +the publicity, let the matter of the Steward's jurisdiction, +be as it may.</p> + + +<h3>PUBLICITY GENERAL.</h3> + +<p>Your Committee do not find any positive law +which binds the judges of the courts in Westminster +Hall publicly to give a reasoned opinion from the +bench, in support of their judgment upon matters that +are stated before them. But the course hath prevailed +from the oldest times. It hath been so general +and so uniform, that it must be considered as +the law of the land. It has prevailed, so far as we +can discover, not only in all the courts which now +exist, whether of law or equity, but in those which +have been suppressed or disused, such as the Court<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_42" id="Page_42">{42}</a></span> +of Wards and the Star Chamber. An author quoted +by Rushworth, speaking of the constitution of that +chamber, says,—"And so it was resolved <i>by the Judges, +on reference made to them; and their opinion, after +deliberate hearing, and view of former precedents, was +published in open court</i>."<a name="FNanchor_28_28" id="FNanchor_28_28"></a><a href="#Footnote_28_28" class="fnanchor" title=" Rushworth, Vol. II. p. 475, et passim.">[28]</a> It appears elsewhere in +the same compiler that all their proceedings were +public, even in deliberating previous to judgment.</p> + +<p>The Judges in their reasonings have always been +used to observe on the arguments employed by the +counsel on either side, and on the authorities cited +by them,—assigning the grounds for rejecting the +authorities which they reject, or for adopting those +to which they adhere, or for a different construction +of law, according to the occasion. This publicity, +not only of decision, but of deliberation, is not confined +to their several courts, whether of law or equity, +whether above or at Nisi Prius; but it prevails where +they are assembled, in the Exchequer Chamber, or at +Serjeants' Inn, or wherever matters come before the +Judges collectively for consultation and revision. It +seems to your Committee to be moulded in the essential +frame and constitution of British judicature. +Your Committee conceives that the English jurisprudence +has not any other sure foundation, nor, consequently, +the lives and properties of the subject any +sure hold, but in the maxims, rules, and principles, +and juridical traditionary line of decisions contained +in the notes taken, and from time to time published, +(mostly under the sanction of the Judges,) called Reports.</p> + +<p>In the early periods of the law it appears to your +Committee that a course still better had been pur<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_43" id="Page_43">{43}</a></span>sued, +but grounded on the same principles; and that +no other cause than the multiplicity of business prevented +its continuance. "Of ancient time," says +Lord Coke, "in cases of difficulties, either criminal +or civil, <i>the reasons and causes</i> of the judgment were +set down <i>upon the record</i>, and so continued in the +reigns of Ed. I. and Ed. II., and then there was no +need of reports; but in the reign of Ed. III. (when +the law was in its height) the causes and reasons of +judgments, in respect of the multitude of them, are +not set down in the record, but then <i>the great casuists +and reporters of cases</i> (certain grave and sad men) +published the cases, <i>and the reasons and causes of the +judgments or resolutions</i>, which, from the beginning +of the reign of Ed. III. and since, we have in print. +But these also, though of great credit and excellent +use in their kind, <i>yet far underneath the authority +of the Parliament Rolls, reporting the acts, judgments, +and resolutions of that highest court</i>."<a name="FNanchor_29_29" id="FNanchor_29_29"></a><a href="#Footnote_29_29" class="fnanchor" title=" Coke, 4 Inst. p. 5.">[29]</a></p> + +<p>Reports, though of a kind less authentic than the +Year Books, to which Coke alludes, have continued +without interruption to the time in which we live. +It is well known that the elementary treatises of law, +and the dogmatical treatises of English jurisprudence, +whether they appear under the names of institutes, +digests, or commentaries, do not rest on the authority +of the supreme power, like the books called the Institute, +Digest, Code, and authentic collations in the +Roman law. With us doctrinal books of that description +have little or no authority, other than as they are +supported by the adjudged cases and reasons given at +one time or other from the bench; and to these they +constantly refer. This appears in Coke's Institutes,<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_44" id="Page_44">{44}</a></span> +in Comyns's Digest, and in all books of that nature. +To give judgment privately is to put an end to reports; +and to put an end to reports is to put an end +to the law of England. It was fortunate for the Constitution +of this kingdom, that, in the judicial proceedings +in the case of ship-money, the Judges did +not then venture to depart from the ancient course. +They gave and they argued their judgment in open +court.<a name="FNanchor_30_30" id="FNanchor_30_30"></a><a href="#Footnote_30_30" class="fnanchor" title=" This is confined to the judicial opinions in Hampden's case. +It does not take in all the extra-judicial opinions.">[30]</a> Their reasons were publicly given, and the +reasons assigned for their judgment took away all its +authority. The great historian, Lord Clarendon, at +that period a young lawyer, has told us that the Judges +gave as law from the bench what every man in +the hall knew not to be law.</p> + +<p>This publicity, and this mode of attending the decision +with its grounds, is observed not only in the +tribunals where the Judges preside in a judicial capacity, +individually or collectively, but where they are +consulted by the Peers on the law in all <i>writs of error</i> +brought from below. In the opinion they give of the +matter assigned as error, one at least of the Judges +argues the questions at large. He argues them publicly, +though in the Chamber of Parliament,—and in +such a manner, that every professor, practitioner, or +student of the law, as well as the parties to the suit, +may learn the opinions of all the Judges of all the +courts upon those points in which the Judges in one +court might be mistaken.</p> + +<p>Your Committee is of opinion that nothing better +could be devised by human wisdom than argued +judgments publicly delivered for preserving unbroken +the great traditionary body of the law, and for mark<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_45" id="Page_45">{45}</a></span>ing, +whilst that great body remained unaltered, every +variation in the application and the construction of +particular parts, for pointing out the ground of each +variation, and for enabling the learned of the bar and +all intelligent laymen to distinguish those changes +made for the advancement of a more solid, equitable, +and substantial justice, according to the variable nature +of human affairs, a progressive experience, and +the improvement of moral philosophy, from those hazardous +changes in any of the ancient opinions and decisions +which may arise from ignorance, from levity, +from false refinement, from a spirit of innovation, or +from other motives, of a nature not more justifiable.</p> + +<p>Your Committee, finding this course of proceeding +to be concordant with the character and spirit of our +judicial proceeding, continued from time immemorial, +supported by arguments of sound theory, and confirmed +by effects highly beneficial, could not see without +uneasiness, in this great trial for Indian offences, +a marked innovation. Against their reiterated requests, +remonstrances, and protestations, the opinions +of the Judges were always taken secretly. Not only +the constitutional publicity for which we contend was +refused to the request and entreaty of your Committee, +but when a noble peer, on the 24th day of June, +1789, did in open court declare that he would then +propose some questions to the Judges in that place, +and hoped to receive their answer openly, according +to the approved good customs of that and of other +courts, the Lords instantly put a stop to the further +proceeding by an immediate adjournment to the +Chamber of Parliament. Upon this adjournment, we +find by the Lords' Journals, that the House, on being +resumed, ordered, that "it should resolve itself into<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_46" id="Page_46">{46}</a></span> +a Committee of the whole House, on Monday next, to +take into consideration what is the proper manner of +putting questions by the Lords to the Judges, and of +their answering the same, in judicial proceedings." +The House did thereon resolve itself into a committee, +from which the Earl of Galloway, on the 29th +of the same month, reported as follows:—"That the +House has, in the trial of Warren Hastings, Esquire, +proceeded in a regular course, in the manner of propounding +their questions to the Judges in the Chamber +of Parliament, and in receiving their answers to +them in the same place." The resolution was agreed +to by the Lords; but the protest as below<a name="FNanchor_31_31" id="FNanchor_31_31"></a><a href="#Footnote_31_31" class="fnanchor" title="_Dissentient._ +1st. Because, by consulting the Judges out of court, in the absence +of the parties, and with shut doors, we have deviated from the most +approved and almost uninterrupted practice of above a century and +a half, and established a precedent not only destructive of the justice +due to the parties at our bar, but materially injurious to the rights +of the community at large, who in cases of impeachments are more +peculiarly interested that all proceedings of this High Court of Parliament +should be open and exposed, like all other courts of justice, +to public observation and comment, in order that no covert and private +practices should defeat the great ends of public justice. +2dly. Because, from private opinions of the Judges, upon private +statements, which the parties have neither heard nor seen, grounds +of a decision will be obtained which must inevitably affect the cause +at issue at our bar; this mode of proceeding seems to be a violation +of the first principle of justice, inasmuch as we thereby force and confine +the opinions of the Judges to our private statement; and through +the medium of our subsequent decision we transfer the effect of those +opinions to the parties, who have been deprived of the right and advantage +of being heard by such, private, though unintended, transmutation +of the point at issue. +3dly. Because the prisoners who may hereafter have the misfortune +to stand at our bar will be deprived of that consolation which +the Lord High Steward Nottingham conveyed to the prisoner, Lord +Cornwallis, viz., 'That the Lords have that tender regard of a prisoner +at the bar, that they will not suffer a case to be put in his absence, +lest it should prejudice him by being wrong stated.' +4thly. Because unusual mystery and secrecy in our judicial proceedings +must tend either to discredit the acquittal of the prisoner, or +render the justice of his condemnation doubtful. PORCHESTER. SUFFOLK AND BERKSHIRE. LOUGHBOROUGH.">[31]</a> was entered +thereupon, and supported by strong arguments.</p> + +<p>Your Committee remark, that this resolution states +only, that the House had proceeded, in this secret +manner of propounding questions to the Judges and +of receiving their answers, during the trial, and on +matters of debate between the parties, "in a regular<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_47" id="Page_47">{47}</a></span> +course." It does not assert that another course would +not have been <i>as</i> regular. It does not state either +judicial convenience, principle, or body of precedents +for that <i>regular course</i>. No such body of precedents +appear on the Journal, that we could discover. +Seven-and-twenty, at least, in a regular series, are +directly contrary to this regular course. Since the +era of the 29th of June, 1789, no one question has +been admitted to go publicly to the Judges.</p> + +<p>This determined and systematic privacy was the +more alarming to your Committee, because the questions +did not (except in that case) originate from +the Lords for the direction of their own conscience. +These questions, in some material instances, were not +made or allowed by the parties at the bar, nor settled +in open court, but differed materially from what your +Managers contended was the true state of the question, +as put and argued by them. They were such as +the Lords thought proper to state for them. Strong +remonstrances produced some alteration in this par<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_48" id="Page_48">{48}</a></span>ticular; +but even after these remonstrances, several +questions were made on statements which the Managers +never made nor admitted.</p> + +<p>Your Committee does not know of any precedent +before this, in which the Peers, on a proposal of the +Commons, or of a less weighty person before their +court, to have the cases publicly referred to the +Judges, and their arguments and resolutions delivered +in their presence, absolutely refused. The very +few precedents of such private reference on trials +have been made, as we have observed already, <i>sub +silentio</i>, and without any observation from the parties. +In the precedents we produce, the determination is accompanied +with its reasons, and the publicity is considered +as the clear, undoubted right of the parties.</p> + +<p>Your Committee, using their best diligence, have +never been able to form a clear opinion upon the +ground and principle of these decisions. The mere +result, upon each case decided by the Lords, furnished +them with no light, from any principle, precedent, +or foregone authority of law or reason, to guide +them with regard to the next matter of evidence +which they had to offer, or to discriminate what matter +ought to be urged or to be set aside: your Committee +not being able to divine whether the particular +evidence, which, upon a conjectural principle, they +might choose to abandon, would not appear to this +House, and to the judging world at large, to be admissible, +and possibly decisive proof. In these straits, +they had and have no choice, but either wholly to +abandon the prosecution, and of consequence to betray +the trust reposed in them by this House, or to +bring forward such matter of evidence as they are +furnished with from sure sources of authenticity, and<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_49" id="Page_49">{49}</a></span> +which in their judgment, aided by the best advice +they could obtain, is possessed of a moral aptitude +juridically to prove or to illustrate the case which +the House had given them, in charge.</p> + + +<h3>MODE OF PUTTING THE QUESTIONS.</h3> + +<p>When your Committee came to examine into those +private opinions of the Judges, they found, to their +no small concern, that the mode both of putting the +questions to the Judges, and their answers, was still +more unusual and unprecedented than the privacy +with which those questions were given and resolved.</p> + +<p>This mode strikes, as we apprehend, at the vital +privileges of the House. For, with the single exception +of the first question put to the Judges in 1788, +the case being stated, the questions are raised directly, +specifically, and by name, on those privileges: +that is, <i>What evidence is it competent for the Managers +of the House of Commons to produce?</i> We conceive +that it was not proper, <i>nor justified by a single precedent</i>, +to refer to the Judges of the inferior courts any +question, and still less for them to decide in their +answer, of what is or is not competent for the House +of Commons, or for any committee acting under +their authority, to do or not to do, in any instance or +respect whatsoever. This new and unheard-of course +can have no other effect than to subject to the discretion +of the Judges the Law of Parliament and the +privileges of the House of Commons, and in a great +measure the judicial privileges of the Peers themselves: +any intermeddling in which on their part we +conceive to be a dangerous and unwarrantable assumption +of power. It is contrary to what has been<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_50" id="Page_50">{50}</a></span> +declared by Lord Coke himself, in a passage before +quoted, to be the duty of the Judges,—and to what +the Judges of former times have confessed to be their +duty, on occasions to which he refers in the time of +Henry VI. And we are of opinion that the conduct +of those sages of the law, and others their successors, +who have been thus diffident and cautious in giving +their opinions upon matters concerning Parliament, +and particularly on the privileges of the House of +Commons, was laudable in the example, and ought +to be followed: particularly the principles upon +which the Judges declined to give their opinions in +the year 1614. It appears by the Journals of the +Lords, that a question concerning the law relative to +impositions having been put to the Judges, the proceeding +was as follows. "Whether the Lords the +Judges shall be heard deliver their opinion touching +the point of impositions, before further consideration +be had of answer to be returned to the lower House +concerning the message from them lately received. +Whereupon the number of the Lords requiring to +hear the Judges' opinions by saying '<i>Content</i>' exceeding +the others which said '<i>Non Content</i>,' the Lords +the Judges, so desiring, were permitted to withdraw +themselves into the Lord Chancellor's private rooms, +where having remained awhile and advised together, +they returned into the House, and, having taken their +places, and standing discovered, did, by the mouth +of the Lord Chief-Justice of the King's Bench, humbly +desire to be forborne at this time, in this place, +to deliver any opinion in this case, for many weighty +and important reasons, which his Lordship delivered +with great gravity and eloquence; concluding that +himself and his brethren are upon particulars in ju<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_51" id="Page_51">{51}</a></span>dicial +course to speak and judge between the King's +Majesty and his people, and likewise between his +Highness's subjects, and in no case to be disputants +on any side."</p> + +<p>Your Committee do not find anything which, +through inadvertence or design, had a tendency to +subject the law and course of Parliament to the +opinions of the Judges of the inferior courts, from +that period until the 1st of James II. The trial of +Lord Delamere for high treason was had by special +commission before the Lord High Steward: it was +before the act which directs that <i>all</i> peers should be +summoned to such trials. This was not a trial in +full Parliament, in which case it was then contended +for that the Lord High Steward was the judge of the +law, presiding in the Court, but had no vote in the +verdict, and that the Lords were triers only, and had +no vote in the judgment of law. This was looked +on as the course, where the trial was not in full +Parliament, in which latter case there was no doubt +but that the Lord High Steward made a part of the +body of the triers, and that the whole House was +the judge.<a name="FNanchor_32_32" id="FNanchor_32_32"></a><a href="#Footnote_32_32" class="fnanchor" title=" See the Lord High Steward's speech on that head, 1st James II.">[32]</a> In this cause, after the evidence for the +Crown had been closed, the prisoner prayed the Court +to adjourn. The Lord High Steward doubted his +power to take that step in that stage of the trial; and +the question was, "Whether, the trial not being in +full Parliament, when the prisoner is upon his trial, +and evidence for the King is given, the Lords being +(as it may be termed) charged with the prisoner, the +Peers may separate for a time, which is the consequence +of an adjournment?" The Lord High Steward +doubted of his power to adjourn the Court. The<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_52" id="Page_52">{52}</a></span> +case was evidently new, and his Grace proposed to +have the opinion of the Judges upon it. The Judges +in consequence offering to withdraw into the Exchequer +Chamber, Lord Falconberg "insisted that +the question concerned the privilege of the Peerage +only, and conceived that <i>the Judges are not concerned +to make any determination in that matter; and being +such a point of privilege, certainly the inferior courts +have no right to determine it</i>." It was insisted, therefore, +that the Lords triers should retire with the +Judges. The Lord High Steward thought differently, +and opposed this motion; but finding the other +opinion generally prevalent, he gave way, and the +Lords triers retired, taking the Judges to their consult. +When the Judges returned, they delivered +their opinion in <i>open court</i>. Lord Chief-Justice Herbert +spoke for himself and the rest of the Judges. +After observing on the novelty of the case, with a +temperate and becoming reserve with regard to the +rights of Parliaments, he marked out the limits of +the office of the inferior Judges on such occasions, +and declared,—"<i>All that we, the Judges, can do is to +acquaint your Grace and the noble Lords what the law +is in the inferior courts in cases of the like nature</i>, and +the reason of the law in those points, and <i>then leave +the jurisdiction of the court to its proper judgment</i>." +The Chief-Justice concluded his statement of the +usage below, and his observations on the difference +of the cases of a peer tried in full Parliament and +by a special commission, in this manner:—"Upon +the whole matter, my Lords, whether the Peers being +judges in the one and not in the other instance alters +the case, or whether the reason of the law in inferior +courts why the jury are not permitted to separate<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_53" id="Page_53">{53}</a></span> +until they have discharged themselves of their verdict +may have any influence on this case, <i>where that +reason seems to fail</i>, the prisoner being to be tried by +men of unquestionable honor, <i>we cannot presume so far +as to make any determination, in a case which is both +new to us and of great consequence in itself</i>; but think +it the proper way for <i>us</i>, having laid matters as we +conceive them before your Grace and my Lords, <i>to +submit the jurisdiction of your own court to your own +determination</i>."</p> + +<p>It appears to your Committee, that the Lords, who +stood against submitting the course of their high +court to the inferior Judges, and that the Judges, +who, with a legal and constitutional discretion, declined +giving any opinion in this matter, acted as +became them; and your Committee sees no reason +why the Peers at this day should be less attentive +to the rights of their court with regard to an exclusive +judgment on their own proceedings or to the +rights of the Commons acting as accusers for the +whole commons of Great Britain in that court, or +why the Judges should be less reserved in deciding +upon any of these points of high Parliamentary privilege, +than the Judges of that and the preceding periods. +This present case is a proceeding in full Parliament, +and not like the case under the commission +in the time of James II., and still more evidently out +of the province of Judges in the inferior courts.</p> + +<p>All the precedents previous to the trial of Warren +Hastings, Esquire, seem to your Committee to be +uniform. The Judges had constantly refused to give +an opinion on any of the powers, privileges, or competencies +of either House. But in the present instance +your Committee has found, with great con<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_54" id="Page_54">{54}</a></span>cern, +a further matter of innovation. Hitherto the +constant practice has been to put questions to the +Judges but in the three following ways: as, 1st, A +question of pure abstract law, without reference to +any case, or merely upon an A.B. case stated to +them; 2dly, To the legal construction of some act +of Parliament; 3dly, To report the course of proceeding +in the courts below upon an abstract case. +Besides these three, your Committee knows not of +a single example of any sort, during the course of +any judicial proceeding at the bar of the House +of Lords, whether the prosecution has been by indictment, +by information from the Attorney-General, or +by impeachment of the House of Commons.</p> + +<p>In the present trial, the Judges appear to your +Committee not to have given their judgment on +points of law, stated as such, but to have in effect +tried the cause, in the whole course of it,—with one +instance to the contrary.</p> + +<p>The Lords have stated no question of general law, +no question on the construction of an act of Parliament, +no question concerning the practice of the +courts below. <i>They put the whole gross case and +matter in question, with all its circumstances, to the +Judges.</i> They have, <i>for the first time</i>, demanded of +them what particular person, paper, or document +ought or ought not to be produced before them by +the Managers for the Commons of Great Britain: for +instance, whether, under such an article, the Bengal +Consultations of such a day, the examination +of Rajah Nundcomar, and the like. The operation +of this method is in substance not only to make the +Judges masters of the whole process and conduct of +the trial, but through that medium to transfer to<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_55" id="Page_55">{55}</a></span> +them the ultimate judgment on the cause itself and +its merits.</p> + +<p>The Judges attendant on the Court of Peers hitherto +have not been supposed to know the particulars +and minute circumstances of the cause, and must +therefore be incompetent to determine upon those +circumstances. The evidence taken, is not, of course, +that we can find, delivered to them; nor do we find +that in fact any order has been made for that purpose, +even supposing that the evidence could at all regularly +be put before them. They are present in court, +not to hear the trial, but solely to advise in matter +of law; they cannot take upon themselves to say anything +about the Bengal Consultations, or to know +anything of Rajah Nundcomar, of Kelleram, or of +Mr. Francis, or Sir John Clavering.</p> + +<p>That the House may be the more fully enabled to +judge of the nature and tendency of thus putting +the question, <i>specifically, and on the gross case</i>, your +Committee thinks fit here to insert one of those questions, +reserving a discussion of its particular merits +to another place. It was stated on the 22d of April, +1790, "On that day the Managers proposed to show +that Kelleram fell into great balances with the East +India Company, in consequence of his appointment." +It is so stated in the printed Minutes (p. 1206). But +the real tendency and gist of the proposition is not +shown. However, the question was put, "Whether it +be or be not competent <i>to the Managers for the Commons +to give evidence upon the charge in the sixth article, +to prove</i> that the rent [at?] which the defendant, Warren +Hastings, Esquire, let the lands mentioned in the +said sixth article of charge to Kelleram fell into arrear +and was deficient; and whether, if proof were offered<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_56" id="Page_56">{56}</a></span> +that the rent fell into arrear immediately after the letting, +the evidence in that case would be competent?" +The Judges answered, on the 27th of the said month, +as follows:—"<i>It is not competent for the Managers for +the House of Commons</i> to give evidence upon the charge +in the sixth article, to prove that the rent at which +the defendant, Warren Hastings, let the lands [mentioned?] +in the said sixth article of charge to Kelleram +fell into arrear and was deficient."</p> + +<p>The House will observe that on the question two +cases of competence were put: the first, on the competence +of Managers for the House of Commons to +give the evidence supposed to be offered by them, but +which we deny to have been offered in the manner +and for the purpose assumed in this question; the +second is in a shape apparently more abstracted, and +more nearly approaching to Parliamentary regularity,—on +the competence of the evidence itself, in the +case of a supposed circumstance being superadded. +The Judges answered only the first, denying flatly the +competence of the Managers. As to the second, the +competence of the supposed evidence, they are profoundly +silent. Having given this blow to our competence, +about the other question, (which was more +within their province,) namely, the competence of +evidence on a case hypothetically stated, they give +themselves no trouble. The Lords on that occasion +rejected the whole evidence. On the face of the +Judges' opinion it is a determination <i>on a case</i>, the +trial of which was not with them, but it contains <i>no +rule or principle of law</i>, to which alone it was their +duty to speak.<a name="FNanchor_33_33" id="FNanchor_33_33"></a><a href="#Footnote_33_33" class="fnanchor" title=" All the resolutions of the Judges, to the time of the reference to +the Committee, are in the Appendix, No. 2.">[33]</a></p> +<p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_57" id="Page_57">{57}</a></span></p> +<p>These essential innovations tend, as your Committee +conceives, to make an entire alteration in the +constitution and in the purposes of the High Court +of Parliament, and even to reverse the ancient relations +between the Lords and the Judges. They tend +wholly to take away from the Commons the benefit +of making good their case before the proper judges, +and submit this high inquest to the inferior courts.</p> + +<p>Your Committee sees no reason why, on the same +principles and precedents, the Lords may not terminate +their proceedings in this, and in all future trials, +by sending the whole body of evidence taken before +them, in the shape of a special verdict, to the Judges, +and may not demand of them, whether they ought, +on the whole matter, to acquit or condemn the prisoner; +nor can we discover any cause that should +hinder them [the Judges] from deciding on the accumulative +body of the evidence as hitherto they have +done in its parts, and from dictating the existence or +non-existence of a misdemeanor or other crime in the +prisoner as they think fit, without any more reference +to principle or precedent of law than hitherto they +have thought proper to apply in determining on the +several parcels of this cause.</p> + +<p>Your Committee apprehends that very serious inconveniencies +and mischiefs may hereafter arise from +a practice in the House of Lords of considering itself +as unable to act without the judges of the inferior +courts, of implicitly following their dictates, of adhering +with a literal precision to the very words of +their responses, and putting them to decide on the +competence of the Managers for the Commons, the +competence of the evidence to be produced, who are +to be permitted to appear, what questions are to be<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_58" id="Page_58">{58}</a></span> +asked of witnesses, and indeed, parcel by parcel, on +the whole of the gross case before them,—as well as +to determine upon the order, method, and process of +every part of their proceedings. The judges of the +inferior courts are by law rendered independent of +the Crown. But this, instead of a benefit to the subject, +would be a grievance, if no way was left of producing +a responsibility. If the Lords cannot or will +not act without the Judges, and if (which God forbid!) +the Commons should find it at any time hereafter +necessary to impeach them before the Lords, this +House would find the Lords disabled in their functions, +fearful of giving any judgment on matter of +law or admitting any proof of fact without them [the +Judges]; and having once assumed the rule of proceeding +and practice below as their rule, they must +at every instant resort, for their means of judging, to +the authority of those whom they are appointed to +judge.</p> + +<p>Your Committee must always act with regard to +men as they are. There are no privileges or exemptions +from the infirmities of our common nature. +We are sensible that all men, and without any evil +intentions, will naturally wish to extend their own jurisdiction, +and to weaken all the power by which they +may be limited and controlled. It is the business of +the House of Commons to counteract this tendency. +This House had given to its Managers no power to +abandon its privileges and the rights of its constituents. +They were themselves as little disposed as +authorized to make this surrender. They are members +of this House, not only charged with the management +of this impeachment, but partaking of a general +trust inseparable from the Commons of Great Britain<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_59" id="Page_59">{59}</a></span> +in Parliament assembled, one of whose principal functions +and duties it is to be observant of the courts of +justice, and to take due care that none of them, from +the lowest to the highest, shall pursue new courses, +unknown to the laws and constitution, of this kingdom, +or to equity, sound legal policy, or substantial justice. +Your Committee were not sent into Westminster +Hall for the purpose of contributing in their persons, +and under the authority of the House, to change the +course or law of Parliament, which had continued unquestioned +for at least four hundred years. Neither +was it any part of their mission to suffer precedents +to be established, with relation to the law and rule +of evidence, which tended in their opinion to shut up +forever all the avenues to justice. They were not to +consider a rule of evidence as a means of concealment. +They were not, without a struggle, to suffer any subtleties +to prevail which would render a process in +Parliament, not the terror, but the protection, of all +the fraud and violence arising from the abuse of British +power in the East. Accordingly, your Managers +contended with all their might, as their predecessors +in the same place had contended with more ability and +learning, but not with more zeal and more firmness, +against those dangerous innovations, as they were +successively introduced: they held themselves bound +constantly to protest, and in one or two instances +they did protest, in discourses of considerable length, +against those private, and, for what they could find, +unargued judicial opinions, which must, as they fear, +introduce by degrees the miserable servitude which +exists where the law is uncertain or unknown.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_60" id="Page_60">{60}</a></span></p> + + +<h3>DEBATES ON EVIDENCE.</h3> + +<p>The chief debates at the bar, and the decisions of +the Judges, (which we find in all cases implicitly +adopted, in all their extent and without qualification, +by the Lords,) turned upon <i>evidence</i>. Your +Committee, before the trial began, were apprised, by +discourses which prudence did not permit them to +neglect, that endeavors would be used to embarrass +them in their proceedings by exceptions against evidence; +that the judgments and opinions of the courts +below would be resorted to on this subject; that there +the rules of evidence were precise, rigorous, and inflexible; +and that the counsel for the criminal would +endeavor to introduce the same rules, with the same +severity and exactness, into this trial. Your Committee +were fully assured, and were resolved strenuously +to contend, that no doctrine or rule of law, +much less the practice of any court, ought to have +weight or authority in Parliament, further than as +such doctrine, rule, or practice is agreeable to the +proceedings in Parliament, or hath received the sanction +of approved precedent there, or is founded on the +immutable principles of substantial justice, without +which, your Committee readily agrees, no practice in +any court, high or low, is proper or fit to be maintained.</p> + +<p>In this preference of the rules observed in the +High Court of Parliament, preëminently superior to +all the rest, there is no claim made which the inferior +courts do not make, each with regard to itself. It is +well known that the rules of proceedings in these +courts vary, and some of them very essentially; yet +the usage of each court is the law of the court, and it<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_61" id="Page_61">{61}</a></span> +would be vain to object to any rule in any court, that +it is not the rule of another court. For instance: as +a general rule, the Court of King's Bench, on trials +by jury, cannot receive depositions, but must judge +by testimony <i>vivâ voce</i>. The rule of the Court of +Chancery is not only not the same, but it is the reverse, +and Lord Hardwicke ruled accordingly. "The constant +and established proceedings of this Court," said +this great magistrate, "are on written evidence, like +the proceedings on the Civil and Canon Law. This +is the course of the Court, and the course of the +Court is the law of the Court."<a name="FNanchor_34_34" id="FNanchor_34_34"></a><a href="#Footnote_34_34" class="fnanchor" title=" Atkyns, Vol. I. p. 445.">[34]</a></p> + +<p>Your Managers were convinced that one of the +principal reasons for which this cause was brought into +Parliament was the danger that in inferior courts +their rule would be formed naturally upon their ordinary +experience, and the exigencies of the cases +which in ordinary course came before them. This +experience, and the exigencies of these cases, extend +little further than the concerns of a people comparatively +in a narrow vicinage, a people of the same or +nearly the same language, religion, manners, laws, +and habits: with them an intercourse of every kind +was easy.</p> + +<p>These rules of law in most cases, and the practice +of the courts in all, could not be easily applicable to +a people separated from Great Britain by a very great +part of the globe,—separated by manners, by principles +of religion, and of inveterate habits as strong as +nature itself, still more than by the circumstance of +local distance. Such confined and inapplicable rules +would be convenient, indeed, to oppression, to extortion, +bribery, and corruption, but ruinous to the <span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_62" id="Page_62">{62}</a></span>people, +whose protection is the true object of all tribunals +and of all their rules. Even English judges in +India, who have been sufficiently tenacious of what +they considered as the rules of English courts, were +obliged in many points, and particularly with regard +to evidence, to relax very considerably, as the civil +and politic government has been obliged to do in +several other cases, on account of insuperable difficulties +arising from a great diversity of manners, +and from what may be considered as a diversity +even in the very constitution of their minds,—instances +of which your Committee will subjoin in a +future Appendix.</p> + +<p>Another great cause why your Committee conceived +this House had chosen to proceed in the High +Court of Parliament was because the inferior courts +were habituated, with very few exceptions, to try men +for the abuse only of their individual and natural +powers, which can extend but a little way.<a name="FNanchor_35_35" id="FNanchor_35_35"></a><a href="#Footnote_35_35" class="fnanchor" title=" Blackstone's Commentaries, Book IV. p. 258.">[35]</a> Before +them, offences, whether of fraud or violence or both, +are, for much the greater part, charged upon persons +of mean and obscure condition. Those unhappy persons +are so far from being supported by men of rank +and influence, that the whole weight and force of the +community is directed against them. In this case, +they are in general objects of protection as well as of +punishment; and the course perhaps ought, as it is +<i>commonly</i> said to be, not to suffer anything to be applied +to their conviction beyond what the strictest +rules will permit. But in the cause which your Managers +have in charge the circumstances are the very +reverse to what happens in the cases of mere personal +delinquency which come before the [inferior] courts.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_63" id="Page_63">{63}</a></span> +These courts have not before them persons who act, +and who justify their acts, by the nature of a despotical +and arbitrary power. The abuses stated in our +impeachment are not those of mere individual, natural +faculties, but the abuses of civil and political authority. +The offence is that of one who has carried +with him, in the perpetration of his crimes, whether +of violence or of fraud, the whole force of the state,—who, +in the perpetration and concealment of offences, +has had the advantage of all the means and +powers given to government for the detection and +punishment of guilt and for the protection of the +people. The people themselves, on whose behalf the +Commons of Great Britain take up this remedial and +protecting prosecution, are naturally timid. Their +spirits are broken by the arbitrary power usurped +over them, and claimed by the delinquent as his law. +They are ready to flatter the power which they +dread. They are apt to look for favor [from their +governors] by covering those vices in the predecessor +which they fear the successor may be disposed to +imitate. They have reason to consider complaints +as means, not of redress, but of aggravation to their +sufferings; and when they shall ultimately hear that +the nature of the British laws and the rules of its +tribunals are such as by no care or study either they, +or even the Commons of Great Britain, who take +up their cause, can comprehend, but which in effect +and operation leave them unprotected, and render +those who oppress them secure in their spoils, they +must think still worse of British justice than of the +arbitrary power of the Company's servants which +hath been exercised to their destruction. They will +be forever, what for the greater part they have hith<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_64" id="Page_64">{64}</a></span>erto +been, inclined to compromise with the corruption +of the magistrates, as a screen against that violence +from which the laws afford them no redress.</p> + +<p>For these reasons your Committee did and do +strongly contend that the Court of Parliament ought +to be open with great facility to the production of all +evidence, except that which the precedents of Parliament +teach them authoritatively to reject, or which +hath no sort of natural aptitude directly or circumstantially +to prove the case. They have been and are +invariably of opinion that the Lords ought <i>to enlarge, +and not to contrast, the rules of evidence, according to +the nature and difficulties of the case</i>, for redress to the +injured, for the punishment of oppression, for the detection +of fraud,—and above all, to prevent, what is +the greatest dishonor to all laws and to all tribunals, +the failure of justice. To prevent the last of +these evils all courts in this and all countries have +constantly made all their maxims and principles concerning +testimony to conform; although such courts +have been bound undoubtedly by stricter rules, both +of form and of prescript cases, than the sovereign +jurisdiction exercised by the Lords on the impeachment +of the Commons ever has been or ever ought +to be. Therefore your Committee doth totally reject +any rules by which the practice of any inferior +court is affirmed as a directory guide to an higher, +especially where the forms and the powers of the +judicature are different, and the objects of judicial +inquiry are not the same.</p> + +<p>Your Committee conceives that the trial of a cause +is not in the arguments or disputations of the prosecutors +and the counsel, but in <i>the evidence</i>, and that +to refuse evidence is to refuse to hear the cause:<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_65" id="Page_65">{65}</a></span> +nothing, therefore, but the most clear and weighty +reasons ought to preclude its production. Your +Committee conceives, that, when evidence on the +face of it relevant, that is, connected with the party +and the charge, was denied to be competent, <i>the burden +lay upon those who opposed it</i> to set forth the +authorities, whether of positive statute, known recognized +maxims and principles of law, passages in an +accredited institute, code, digest, or systematic treatise +of laws, or some adjudged cases, wherein, the +courts have rejected evidence of that nature. No +such thing ever (except in one instance, to which we +shall hereafter speak) was produced at the bar, nor +(that we know of) produced by the Lords in their +debates, or by the Judges in the opinions by them +delivered. Therefore, for anything which as yet +appears to your Committee to the contrary, these +responses and decisions were, in many of the points, +not the determinations of any law whatsoever, but +mere arbitrary decrees, to which we could not without +solemn protestation, submit.</p> + +<p>Your Committee, at an early period, and frequently +since the commencement of this trial, have neglected +no means of research which might afford them information +concerning these supposed strict and inflexible +rules of proceeding and of evidence, which, appeared +to them, destructive of all the means and ends of justice: +and, first, they examined carefully the Rolls and +Journals of the House of Lords, as also the printed +trials of cases before that court.</p> + +<p>Your Committee finds but one instance, in the +whole course of Parliamentary impeachments, in +which evidence offered by the Commons has been +rejected on the plea of inadmissibility or incompe<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_66" id="Page_66">{66}</a></span>tence. +This was in the case of Lord Strafford's trial; +when the copy of a warrant (the same not having any +attestation to authenticate it as a true copy) was, on +deliberation, not admitted,—and your Committee +thinks, as the case stood, with reason. But even in +this one instance the Lords seemed to show a marked +anxiety not to narrow too much the admissibility of +evidence; for they confined their determination "to +this individual case," as the Lord Steward reported +their resolution; and he adds,—"They conceive this +could be no impediment or failure in the proceeding, +because the truth and verity of it would depend on +the first general power given to execute it, which they +who manage the evidence for the Commons say they +could prove."<a name="FNanchor_36_36" id="FNanchor_36_36"></a><a href="#Footnote_36_36" class="fnanchor" title=" Lords' Journals, Vol. IV. p. 204. An. 1641. Rush. Trial of +Lord Strafford, p. 430.">[36]</a> Neither have objections to evidence +offered by the prisoner been very frequently made, +nor often allowed when made. In the same case of +Lord Strafford, two books produced by his Lordship, +without proof by whom they were written, were rejected, +(and on a clear principle,) "as being private +books, and no records."<a name="FNanchor_37_37" id="FNanchor_37_37"></a><a href="#Footnote_37_37" class="fnanchor" title=" Lords' Journals, Vol. IV. p. 210.">[37]</a> On both these occasions, +the questions were determined by the Lords alone, +without any resort to the opinions of the Judges. In +the impeachments of Lord Stafford, Dr. Sacheverell, +and Lord Wintoun, no objection to evidence appears +in the Lords' Journals to have been pressed, and not +above one taken, which was on the part of the Managers.</p> + +<p>Several objections were, indeed, taken to evidence +in Lord Macclesfield's trial.<a name="FNanchor_38_38" id="FNanchor_38_38"></a><a href="#Footnote_38_38" class="fnanchor" title=" Id. Vol. XXII. p. 536 to 546. An. 1725.">[38]</a> They were made on the<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_67" id="Page_67">{67}</a></span> +part of the Managers, except in two instances, where +the objections were made by the witnesses themselves. +They were all determined (those started by the Managers +in their favor) by the Lords themselves, without +any reference to the Judges. In the discussion of one +of them, a question was stated for the Judges concerning +the law in a similar case upon an information in +the court below; but it was set aside by the previous +question.<a name="FNanchor_39_39" id="FNanchor_39_39"></a><a href="#Footnote_39_39" class="fnanchor" title=" Lords' Journals, Vol. XXII. p. 541.">[39]</a></p> + +<p>On the impeachment of Lord Lovat, no more than +one objection to evidence was taken by the Managers, +against which Lord Lovat's counsel were not permitted +to argue. Three objections on the part of the +prisoner were made to the evidence offered by the +Managers, but all without success.<a name="FNanchor_40_40" id="FNanchor_40_40"></a><a href="#Footnote_40_40" class="fnanchor" title=" Id. Vol. XXVII. p. 63, 65. An. 1746">[40]</a> The instances +of similar objections in Parliamentary trials of peers +on indictments are too few and too unimportant to +require being particularized;—one, that in the case +of Lord Warwick, has been already stated.</p> + +<p>The principles of these precedents do not in the +least affect any case of evidence which your Managers +had to support. The paucity and inapplicability of +instances of this kind convince your Committee that +the Lords have ever used some latitude and liberality +in all the means of bringing information before them: +nor is it easy to conceive, that, as the Lords are, and +of right ought to be, judges of law and fact, many +cases should occur (except those where a personal +<i>vivâ voce</i> witness is denied to be competent) in which +a judge, possessing an entire judicial capacity, can +determine by anticipation what is good evidence, and +what not, before he has heard it. When he has heard<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_68" id="Page_68">{68}</a></span> +it, of course he will judge what weight it is to have +upon his mind, or whether it ought not entirely to be +struck out of the proceedings.</p> + +<p>Your Committee, always protesting, as before, +against the admission of any law, foreign or domestic, +as of authority in Parliament, further than as +written reason and the opinion of wise and informed +men, has examined into the writers on the Civil Law, +ancient and more recent, in order to discover what +those rules of evidence, in any sort applicable to criminal +cases, were, which were supposed to stand in the +way of the trial of offences committed in India.</p> + +<p>They find that the term Evidence, <i>Evidentia</i>, from +whence ours is taken, has a sense different in the +Roman law from what it is understood to bear in the +English jurisprudence; the term most nearly answering +to it in the Roman being <i>Probatio</i>, Proof, which, +like the term <i>Evidence</i>, is a generic term, including +everything by which a doubtful matter may be rendered +more certain to the judge: or, as Gilbert expresses +it, every matter is evidence which amounts to +the proof of the point in question.<a name="FNanchor_41_41" id="FNanchor_41_41"></a><a href="#Footnote_41_41" class="fnanchor" title=" Gilbert's Law of Evidence, p. 23.">[41]</a></p> + +<p>On the general head of Evidence, or Proof, your +Committee finds that much has been written by persons +learned in the Roman law, particularly in modern +times,—and that many attempts have been made +to reduce to rules the principles of evidence or proof, +a matter which by its very nature seems incapable +of that simplicity, precision, and generality which are +necessary to supply the matter or to give the form +to a rule of law. Much learning has been employed +on the doctrine of indications and presumptions in +their books,—far more than is to be found in our<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_69" id="Page_69">{69}</a></span> +law. Very subtle disquisitions were made on all +matters of jurisprudence in the times of the classical +Civil Law, by the followers of the Stoic school.<a name="FNanchor_42_42" id="FNanchor_42_42"></a><a href="#Footnote_42_42" class="fnanchor" title=" Gravina, 84, 85.">[42]</a> In +the modern school of the same law, the same course +was taken by Bartolus, Baldus, and the Civilians +who followed them, before the complete revival of literature.<a name="FNanchor_43_43" id="FNanchor_43_43"></a><a href="#Footnote_43_43" class="fnanchor" title=" Id. 90 usque ad 100.">[43]</a> +All the discussions to be found in those +voluminous writings furnish undoubtedly an useful +exercise to the mind, by methodizing the various +forms in which one set of facts or collection of facts, +or the qualities or demeanor of persons, reciprocally +influence each other; and by this course of juridical +discipline they add to the readiness and sagacity of +those who are called to plead or to judge. But as +human affairs and human actions are not of a metaphysical +nature, but the subject is concrete, complex, +and moral, they cannot be subjected (without +exceptions which reduce it almost to nothing) to any +certain rule. Their rules with regard to competence +were many and strict, and our lawyers have mentioned +it to their reproach. "The Civilians," it has +been observed, "differ in nothing more than admitting +evidence; for they reject <i>histriones</i>, &c., and +whole tribes of people."<a name="FNanchor_44_44" id="FNanchor_44_44"></a><a href="#Footnote_44_44" class="fnanchor" title=" Atkyns, Rep. Vol. I p. 37, Omichund _versus_ Barker.">[44]</a> But this extreme rigor as +to competency, rejected by our law, is not found to +extend to the <i>genus</i> of evidence, but only to a particular +<i>species</i>,—personal witnesses. Indeed, after +all their efforts to fix these things by positive and +inflexible maxims, the best Roman lawyers, in their +best ages, were obliged to confess that every case of +evidence rather formed its own rule than that any +rule could be adapted to every case. The best opin<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_70" id="Page_70">{70}</a></span>ions, +however, seem to have reduced the admissibility +of witnesses to a few heads. "For if," said Callistratus, +in a passage preserved to us in the Digest, "the +testimony is free from suspicion, either on account of +the quality of the <i>person</i>, namely, that he is in a reputable +situation, or for <i>cause</i>, that is to say, that the +testimony given is not for reward nor favor nor for +enmity, such a witness is admissible." This first description +goes to <i>competence</i>, between which and <i>credit</i> +Lord Hardwicke justly says the discrimination is +very nice. The other part of the text shows their +anxiety to reduce credibility itself to a fixed rule. It +proceeds, therefore,—"His Sacred Majesty, Hadrian, +issued a rescript to Vivius Varus, Lieutenant of Cilicia, +to this effect, that he who sits in judgment is +the most capable of determining what credit is to be +given to witnesses." The words of the letter of rescript +are as follow:—"You ought best to know what +credit is to be given to witnesses,—who, and of what +dignity, and of what estimation they are,—whether +they seem to deliver their evidence with simplicity +and candor, whether they seem to bring a formed and +premeditated discourse, or whether on the spot they +give probable matter in answer to the questions that +are put to them." And there remains a rescript of +the same prince to Valerius Verus, on the bringing +out the credit of witnesses. This appears to go more +to the <i>general</i> principles of evidence. It is in these +words:—"What evidence, and in what measure or +degree, shall amount to proof in each case can be +defined in no manner whatsoever that is sufficiently +certain. For, though not always, yet frequently, the +truth of the affair may appear without any matter of +public record. In some cases the number of the wit<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_71" id="Page_71">{71}</a></span>nesses, +in others their dignity and authority, is to be +weighed; in others, concurring public fame tends to +confirm the credit of the evidence in question. This +alone I am able, and in a few words, to give you as +my determination: that you ought not too readily to +bind yourself to try the cause upon any one description +of evidence; but you are to estimate by your +own discretion what you ought to credit, or what +appears to you not to be established by proof sufficient."<a name="FNanchor_45_45" id="FNanchor_45_45"></a><a href="#Footnote_45_45" class="fnanchor" title=" Digest. Lib. XXII. Tit. 5.">[45]</a></p> + +<p>The modern writers on the Civil Law have likewise +much matter on this subject, and have introduced a +strictness with regard to personal testimony which +our particular jurisprudence has not thought it at +all proper to adopt. In others we have copied them +more closely. They divide Evidence into two parts, +in which they do not differ from the ancients: 1st, +What is Evidence, or Proof, by itself; 2dly, What +is Presumption, "which is a probable conjecture, from +a reference to something which, coming from marks +and tokens ascertained, shall be taken for truth, until +some other shall be adduced." Again, they have labored +particularly to fix rules for presumptions, which +they divide into, 1. Violent and necessary, 2. Probable, +3. and lastly, Slight and rash.<a name="FNanchor_46_46" id="FNanchor_46_46"></a><a href="#Footnote_46_46" class="fnanchor" title=" Calvinus, voce _Præsumptio_.">[46]</a> But finding +that this head of Presumptive Evidence (which makes +so large a part with them and with us in the trial +of all causes, and particularly criminal causes) is extremely +difficult to ascertain, either with regard to +what shall be considered as exclusively creating any +of these three degrees of presumption, or what facts, +and how proved, and what marks and tokens, may +serve to establish them, even those Civilians whose<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_72" id="Page_72">{72}</a></span> +character it is to be subtle to a fault have been obliged +to abandon the task, and have fairly confessed that the +labors of writers to fix rules for these matters have +been vain and fruitless. One of the most able of +them<a name="FNanchor_47_47" id="FNanchor_47_47"></a><a href="#Footnote_47_47" class="fnanchor" title=" Bartolus.">[47]</a> has said, "that the doctors of the law have +written nothing of value concerning presumptions; +nor is the subject-matter such as to be reduced within +the prescribed limit of any certain rules. In truth, +it is from the actual existing case, and from the circumstances +of the persons and of the business, that +we ought (under the guidance of an incorrupt judgment +of the mind, which is called an equitable discretion) +to determine what presumptions or conjectural +proofs are to be admitted as rational or rejected as +false, or on which the understanding can pronounce +nothing, either the one way or the other."</p> + +<p>It is certain, that, whatever over-strictness is to be +found in the older writers on this law with regard to +evidence, it chiefly related to the mere competency +of witnesses; yet even here the rigor of the Roman +lawyers relaxed on the necessity of the case. Persons +who kept houses of ill-fame were with them +incompetent witnesses; yet among the maxims of +that law the rule is well known of <i>Testes lupanares +in re lupanari</i>.</p> + +<p>In ordinary cases, they require two witnesses to +prove a fact; and therefore they held, "that, if there +be but one witness, and no probable grounds of presumption +of some kind (<i>nulla argumenta</i>), that one +witness is by no means to be heard"; and it is not +inelegantly said in that case, <i>Non jus deficit, sed probatio</i>, +"The failure is not in the law, but in the +proof." But if other grounds of presumption appear,<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_73" id="Page_73">{73}</a></span> +one witness is to be heard: "for it is not necessary +that one crime should be established by one sort of +proof only, as by witnesses, or by documents, or by +presumptions; all the modes of evidence may be so +conjoined, that, where none of them alone would +affect the prisoner, all the various concurrent proofs +should overpower him like a storm of hail." This +is held particularly true in cases where crimes are +secret, and detection difficult. The necessity of detecting +and punishing such crimes superseded, in the +soundest authors, this theoretic aim at perfection, and +obliged technical science to submit to practical expedience. +"<i>In re criminali</i>," said the rigorists, "<i>probationes +debent esse evidentes et luce meridiana clariores</i>": +and so undoubtedly it is in offences which admit +such proof. But reflection taught them that even +their favorite rules of incompetence must give way +to the exigencies of distributive justice. One of the +best modern writers on the Imperial Criminal Law, +particularly as practised in Saxony, (Carpzovius,) +says,—"This alone I think it proper to remark, that +even incompetent witnesses are sometimes admitted, +if otherwise the truth cannot be got at; and this +particularly in facts and crimes which are of difficult +proof"; and for this doctrine he cites Farinacius, +Mascardus, and other eminent Civilians who had +written on Evidence. He proceeds afterwards,—"However, +this is to be taken with a caution, that +the impossibility of otherwise discovering the truth is +not construed from hence, that other witnesses were +not actually concerned, but that, from the nature of +the crime, or from regard had to the place and time, +other witnesses could not be present." Many other +passages from the same authority, and from others to<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_74" id="Page_74">{74}</a></span> +a similar effect, might be added; we shall only remark +shortly, that Gaill, a writer on the practice +of that law the most frequently cited in our own +courts, gives the rule more in the form of a maxim,—"that +the law is contented with such proof as +<i>can</i> be made, if the subject <i>in its nature</i> is difficult of +proof."<a name="FNanchor_48_48" id="FNanchor_48_48"></a><a href="#Footnote_48_48" class="fnanchor" title=" Lib. II. Obs. 149, § 9.">[48]</a> And the same writer, in another passage, +refers to another still more general maxim, (and a +sound maxim it is,) that the power and means of +proof ought not to be narrowed, but enlarged, that +the truth may not be concealed: "<i>Probationum facultas +non angustari, sed ampliari debeat, ne veritas +occultetur.</i>"<a name="FNanchor_49_49" id="FNanchor_49_49"></a><a href="#Footnote_49_49" class="fnanchor" title=" Lib. I. Obs. 91, § 7.">[49]</a></p> + +<p>On the whole, your Committee can find nothing +in the writings of the learned in this law, any more +than they could discover anything in the Law of Parliament, +to support any one of the determinations +given by the Judges, and adopted by the Lords, +against the evidence which your Committee offered, +whether direct and positive, or merely (as for the +greater part it was) circumstantial, and produced as +a ground to form legitimate presumption against +the defendant: nor, if they were to admit (which +they do not) this Civil Law to be of authority in +furnishing any rule in an impeachment of the Commons, +more than as it may occasionally furnish a +principle of reason on a new or undetermined point, +do they find any rule or any principle, derived from +that law, which could or ought to have made us keep +back the evidence which we offered; on the contrary, +we rather think those rules and principles to be in +agreement with our conduct.</p> + +<p>As to the Canon Law, your Committee, finding it<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_75" id="Page_75">{75}</a></span> +to have adopted the Civil Law with no very essential +variation, does not feel it necessary to make any +particular statement on that subject.</p> + +<p>Your Committee then came to examine into the +authorities in the English law, both as it has prevailed +for many years back, and as it has been recently +received in our courts below. They found on +the whole the rules rather less strict, more liberal, +and less loaded with positive limitations, than in the +Roman law. The origin of this latitude may perhaps +be sought in this circumstance, which we know to +have relaxed the rigor of the Roman law: courts in +England do not judge upon evidence, <i>secundum allegata +et probata</i>, as in other countries and under other +laws they do, but upon verdict. By a fiction of law +they consider the jury as supplying, in some sense, +the place of testimony. One witness (and for that +reason) is allowed sufficient to convict, in cases of +felony, which in other laws is not permitted.</p> + +<p>In ancient times it has happened to the law of +England (as in pleading, so in matter of evidence) +that a rigid strictness in the application of technical +rules has been more observed than at present it is. +In the more early ages, as the minds of the Judges +were in general less conversant in the affairs of the +world, as the sphere of their jurisdiction was less extensive, +and as the matters which came before them +were of less variety and complexity, the rule being in +general right, not so much inconvenience on the whole +was found from a literal adherence to it as might have +arisen from an endeavor towards a liberal and equitable +departure, for which further experience, and +a more continued cultivation of equity as a science, +had not then so fully prepared them. In those times<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_76" id="Page_76">{76}</a></span> +that judicial policy was not to be condemned. We +find, too, that, probably from the same cause, most of +their doctrine leaned towards the restriction; and the +old lawyers being bred, according to the then philosophy +of the schools, in habits of great subtlety and refinement +of distinction, and having once taken that +bent, very great acuteness of mind was displayed in +maintaining every rule, every maxim, every presumption +of law creation, and every fiction of law, with a +punctilious exactness: and this seems to have been +the course which laws have taken in every nation.<a name="FNanchor_50_50" id="FNanchor_50_50"></a><a href="#Footnote_50_50" class="fnanchor" title=" Antiqua jurisprudentia aspera quidem illa, tenebricosa, et tristis, +non tam in æquitate quam in verborum superstitione fundata, eaque +Ciceronis ætatem fere attigit, mansitque annos circiter CCCL. Quæ +hanc excepit, viguitque annos fere septuaginta novem, superiori longe +humanior; quippe quæ magis utilitate communi, quam potestate verborum, +negotia moderaretur.—Gravina, p. 86.">[50]</a> +It was probably from this rigor, and from a sense +of its pressure, that, at an early period of our law, +far more causes of criminal jurisdiction were carried +into the House of Lords and the Council Board, +where laymen were judges, than can or ought to be +at present.</p> + +<p>As the business of courts of equity became more +enlarged and more methodical,—as magistrates, for +a long series of years, presided in the Court of Chancery, +who were not bred to the Common Law,—as +commerce, with its advantages and its necessities, +opened a communication more largely with other +countries,—as the Law of Nature and Nations +(always a part of the law of England) came to be +cultivated,—as an increasing empire, as new views +and new combinations of things were opened,—this +antique rigor and overdone severity gave way to<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_77" id="Page_77">{77}</a></span> +the accommodation of human concerns, for which +rules were made, and not human concerns to bend +to them.</p> + +<p>At length, Lord Hardwicke, in one of the cases the +most solemnly argued, that has been in man's memory, +with the aid of the greatest learning at the bar, +and with the aid of all the learning on the bench, +both bench and bar being then supplied with men of +the first form, declared from the bench, and in concurrence +with the rest of the Judges, and with the +most learned of the long robe, the able council on the +side of the old restrictive principles making no reclamation, +"that the judges and sages of the law have +laid it down that there is but ONE general rule of +evidence,—<i>the best that the nature of the case will admit</i>."<a name="FNanchor_51_51" id="FNanchor_51_51"></a><a href="#Footnote_51_51" class="fnanchor" title=" Omichund _v._ Barker, Atk. I.">[51]</a> +This, then, the master rule, that governs all +the subordinate rules, does in reality subject itself +and its own virtue and authority <i>to the nature of the +case</i>, and leaves no rule at all of an independent, abstract, +and substantive quality. Sir Dudley Ryder, +(then Attorney-General, afterwards Chief-Justice,) +in his learned argument, observed, that "it is extremely +proper that there should be <i>some</i> general +rules in relation to evidence; but <i>if exceptions were +not allowed to them, it would be better to demolish all +the general rules</i>. There is no general rule without +exception that we know of but this,—that <i>the +best evidence shall be admitted which the nature of +the case will afford</i>. I will show that rules as general +as this are broke in upon <i>for the sake of allowing +evidence</i>. There is no rule that seems more binding +than that a man shall not be admitted an evidence in +his own case, and yet the Statute of Hue and Cry is<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_78" id="Page_78">{78}</a></span> +an exception. A man's books are allowed to be evidence, +or, which is in substance the same, his servant's +books, <i>because the nature of the case requires it</i>,—as +in the case of a brewer's servants. Another general +rule, that a wife cannot be witness against her +husband, has been broke in upon in cases of treason. +Another exception to the general rule, that a man +may not be examined without oath,—the last words +of a dying man are given in evidence in the case +of murder." Such are the doctrines of this great +lawyer.</p> + +<p>Chief-Justice Willes concurs with Lord Hardwicke +as to dispensing with strict rules of evidence. "Such +evidence," [he says,] "is to be admitted as the <i>necessity</i> +of the case will allow of: as, for instance, a +marriage at Utrecht, certified under the seal of the +minister there, and of the said town, and that they +cohabited together as man and wife, was held to be +sufficient proof that they were married." This learned +judge (commenting upon Lord Coke's doctrine, +and Serjeant Hawkins's after him, that the oaths of +Jews and pagans were not to be taken) says, "that +this notion, though advanced by so great a man, is +contrary to religion, common sense, and common +humanity, and I think the devils, to whom he has +delivered them, could not have suggested anything +worse." Chief-Justice Willes, admitting Lord Coke +to be a great lawyer, then proceeds in very strong +terms, and with marks of contempt, to condemn +"<i>his narrow notions</i>"; and he treats with as little +respect or decorum the ancient authorities referred +to in defence of such notions.</p> + +<p>The principle of the departure from those rules is +clearly fixed by Lord Hardwicke; he lays it down as<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_79" id="Page_79">{79}</a></span> +follows:—"The first ground judges have gone upon, +in departing from strict rules, is <i>absolute strict necessity</i>; +2dly, a <i>presumed</i> necessity." Of the first he +gives these instances:—"In the case of writings +subscribed by witnesses, if all are dead, the proof of +one of their hands is sufficient to establish the deed. +Where an original is lost, a copy may be admitted; +if no copy, then a proof by witnesses who have <i>heard</i> +the deed: and yet it is a thing the law abhors, to +admit the memory of man for evidence." This enlargement +through two stages of proof, both of them +contrary to the rule of law, and both abhorrent from +its principles, are by this great judge accumulated +upon one another, and are admitted from <i>necessity</i>, +to accommodate human affairs, and to prevent that +which courts are by every possible means instituted +to prevent,—A FAILURE OF JUSTICE. And +this necessity is not confined within the strict limits +of physical causes, but is more lax, and takes in +<i>moral and even presumed and argumentative necessity</i>, +a necessity which is in fact nothing more than a +great degree of expediency. The law creates a fictitious +necessity against the rules of evidence in favor +of the convenience of trade: an exception which on +a similar principle had before been admitted in the +Civil Law, as to mercantile causes, in which the +books of the party were received to give full effect to +an insufficient degree of proof, called, in the nicety of +their distinctions, a <i>semiplena probatio</i>.<a name="FNanchor_52_52" id="FNanchor_52_52"></a><a href="#Footnote_52_52" class="fnanchor" title=" Gaill, Lib. II. Obs. 20, § 5.">[52]</a></p> + +<p>But to proceed with Lord Hardwicke. He observes, +that "a tradesman's books" (that is, the acts +of the party interested himself) "are admitted as +evidence, though no <i>absolute necessity</i>, but by rea<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_80" id="Page_80">{80}</a></span>son +of a <i>presumption</i> of necessity only, <i>inferred</i> from +the nature of commerce." "No rule," continued +Lord Hardwicke, "can be more settled than that +testimony is not to be received but upon oath"; +but he lays it down, that an oath itself may be dispensed +with. "There is another instance," says he, +"where the lawful oath may be dispensed with,—where +our courts admit evidence for the Crown without +oath."</p> + +<p>In the same discussion, the Chief-Baron (Parker) +cited cases in which <i>all</i> the rules of evidence had +given way. "There is not a more general rule," +says he, "than that hearsay cannot be admitted, nor +husband and wife as witnesses against each other; +and yet it is <i>notorious</i> that from necessity they have +been allowed,—not an <i>absolute</i> necessity, but a <i>moral</i> +one."</p> + +<p>It is further remarkable, in this judicial argument, +that exceptions are allowed not only to rules +of evidence, but that the rules of evidence themselves +are not altogether the same, where the subject-matter +varies. The Judges have, to facilitate justice, and to +favor commerce, even adopted the rules of <i>foreign</i> +laws. They have taken for granted, and would not +suffer to be questioned, the regularity and justice of +the proceedings of foreign courts; and they have admitted +them as evidence, not only of the fact of the +decision, but of the right as to its legality. "Where +there are foreign parties interested, and in commercial +matters, the rules of evidence are not quite the +same as in other instances in courts of justice: the +case of Hue and Cry, Brownlow, 47. A feme covert +is not a lawful witness against her husband, except +in cases of treason, but has been admitted in civil<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_81" id="Page_81">{81}</a></span> +cases.<a name="FNanchor_53_53" id="FNanchor_53_53"></a><a href="#Footnote_53_53" class="fnanchor" title=" N.B.—In some criminal cases also, though not of treason, husband +is admitted to prove an assault upon his wife, for the King, +ruled by Raymond, Chief-Justice, Trin. 11th Geo., King _v._ Azire. +And for various other exceptions see Buller's Nisi Prius, 286, 287.">[53]</a> The testimony of a public notary is evidence +by the law of France: contracts are made before a +public notary, and no other witness necessary. I +should think it would be no doubt at all, if it came +in question here, whether this would be a valid contract, +but a testimony from persons of that credit and +reputation would be received as a very good proof +in foreign transactions, and would authenticate the +contract."<a name="FNanchor_54_54" id="FNanchor_54_54"></a><a href="#Footnote_54_54" class="fnanchor" title=" Cro. Charl. 365.">[54]</a></p> + +<p>These cases show that courts always govern themselves +by these rules in cases of foreign transactions. +To this principle Lord Hardwicke accords; and enlarging +the rule of evidence by the nature of the subject +and the exigencies of the case, he lays it down, +"that it is a common and <i>natural</i> presumption, that +persons of the Gentoo religion should be principally +apprised of facts and transactions in their own country. +As the English have only a factory in this country, +(for it is in the empire of the Great Mogul,) +if we should admit this evidence [Gentoo evidence on +a Gentoo oath], it would be agreeable to the genius +of the law of England." For this he cites the proceedings +of our Court of Admiralty, and adopts the +author who states the precedent, "that this Court +will give credit to the sentence of the Court of Admiralty +in France, and take it to be according to right, +and will not examine their proceedings: for it would +be found very inconvenient, if one kingdom should, +by peculiar laws, correct the judgments and pro<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_82" id="Page_82">{82}</a></span>ceedings +of another kingdom." Such is the genius +of the law of England, that these two principles, +of the general moral necessities of things, and the +nature of the case, overrule every other principle, +even those rules which seem the very strongest. +Chief-Baron Parker, in answer to an objection made +against the infidel deponent, "that the plaintiff ought +to have shown that he could not have the evidence +of Christians," says, "that, repugnant to natural justice, +in the Statute of Hue and Cry, the robbed is +admitted to be witness of the robbery, as <i>a moral or +presumed necessity is sufficient</i>." The same learned +magistrate, pursuing his argument in favor of liberality, +in opening and enlarging the avenues to justice, +does not admit that "the authority of one or two +cases" is valid against reason, equity, and convenience, +the vital principles of the law. He cites Wells +<i>v.</i> Williams, 1 Raymond, 282, to show that the necessity +of trade has mollified the too rigorous rules of +the old law, in their restraint and discouragement of +aliens. "A Jew may sue at <i>this</i> day, but <i>heretofore +he could not</i>, for then they were looked upon as enemies, +but now commerce has taught the world more +humanity; and therefore held that an alien enemy, +commorant here by the license of the King, and +under his protection, may maintain a debt upon a +bond, though he did not come with safe-conduct." +So far Parker, concurring with Raymond. He proceeds:—"It +was objected by the defendant's counsel, +that this is a novelty, and that what never has been +done ought not to be done." The answer is, "<i>The +law of England is not confined to particular cases, +but is much more governed by reason than by any one +case whatever.</i> The true rule is laid down by Lord<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_83" id="Page_83">{83}</a></span> +Vaughan, fol. 37, 38. 'Where the law,' saith he, 'is +<i>known and clear</i>, the Judges must determine as the +law is, without regard to the inequitableness or inconveniency: +these defects, if they happen in the law, +can only be remedied by Parliament. But where the +law is doubtful and not clear, the Judges ought to +interpret the law to be as is most consonant to equity, +and what is least inconvenient.'"</p> + +<p>These principles of equity, convenience, and natural +reason Lord Chief-Justice Lee considered in the +same ruling light, not only as guides in matter of +interpretation concerning law in general, but in particular +as controllers of the whole law of evidence, +which, being artificial, and made for convenience, is +to be governed by that convenience for which it is +made, and is to be wholly subservient to the stable +principles of substantial justice, "I do apprehend," +said that Chief-Justice, "that the rules of evidence +are to be considered as <i>artificial</i> rules, framed by +men for <i>convenience in courts of justice</i>. This is a +case that ought to be looked upon in that light; and +I take it that considering evidence in this way [viz. +according to natural justice] <i>is agreeable to the genius +of the law of England</i>."</p> + +<p>The sentiments of Murray, then Solicitor-General, +afterwards Lord Mansfield, are of no small weight in +themselves, and they are authority by being judicially +adopted. His ideas go to the growing melioration +of the law, by making its liberality keep pace with +the demands of justice and the actual concerns of the +world: not restricting the infinitely diversified occasions +of men and the rules of natural justice within +artificial circumscriptions, but conforming our jurisprudence +to the growth of our commerce and of our<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_84" id="Page_84">{84}</a></span> +empire. This enlargement of our concerns he appears, +in the year 1744, almost to have foreseen, and +he lived to behold it. "The arguments on the other +side," said that great light of the law, (that is, arguments +against admitting the testimony in question +from the novelty of the case,) "prove nothing. Does +it follow from thence, that no witnesses can be examined +in a case that never specifically existed before, +or that an action cannot be brought in a case that +never happened before? <i>Reason</i> (being stated to be +the first ground of all laws by the author of the book +called 'Doctor and Student') must determine the +case. Therefore the only question is, Whether, <i>upon +principles of reason, justice, and convenience</i>, this +witness be admissible? Cases in law depend upon +the <i>occasions</i> which gave rise to them. All occasions +do not arise at once: now a particular species +of Indians appears; hereafter another species +of Indians may arise. A statute can seldom take in +all cases. Therefore the Common Law, that works +itself pure by rules drawn from the fountain of justice, +is for this reason superior to an act of Parliament."<a name="FNanchor_55_55" id="FNanchor_55_55"></a><a href="#Footnote_55_55" class="fnanchor" title=" Omichund _v._ Barker, 1st Atkyns, ut supra.">[55]</a></p> + +<p>From the period of this great judgment to the trial +of Warren Hastings, Esquire, the law has gone on +continually working itself pure (to use Lord Mansfield's +expression) by rules drawn from the fountain +of justice. "General rules," said the same person, +when he sat upon the bench, "are wisely established +for attaining justice with ease, certainty, and dispatch; +but the great end of them being <i>to do justice</i>, the +Court will see that it be really obtained. The courts +have been more liberal of late years in their determi<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_85" id="Page_85">{85}</a></span>nations, +and have more endeavored to attend to the +<i>real justice</i> of the case than formerly." On another +occasion, of a proposition for setting aside a verdict, +he said, "This seems to be the true way to come at +justice, and what we therefore ought to do; for the +true text is, <i>Boni judicis est ampliare justitiam</i> (not +<i>jurisdictionem</i>, as has been often cited)."<a name="FNanchor_56_56" id="FNanchor_56_56"></a><a href="#Footnote_56_56" class="fnanchor" title=" Rex _v._ Philips, Burrow, Vol. I. p. 301, 302, 304.">[56]</a> In conformity +to this principle, the supposed rules of evidence +have, in late times and judgments, instead of +being drawn to a greater degree of strictness, been +greatly relaxed.</p> + +<p>"<i>All evidence is according to the subject-matter to +which it is applied.</i> There is a great deal of difference +between length of time that operates as a bar +to a claim and that which is used only by way of +evidence. Length of time used merely by way of +evidence may be left to the consideration of the +jury, to be credited or not, or to draw their inferences +one way or the other, according to circumstances. +<i>I do not know an instance in which proof +may not be supplied.</i>"<a name="FNanchor_57_57" id="FNanchor_57_57"></a><a href="#Footnote_57_57" class="fnanchor" title=" Mayor of Hull _v._ Horner, Cowper's Reports, 109.">[57]</a> In all cases of evidence Lord +Mansfield's maxim was, <i>to lean to admissibility</i>, leaving +the objections which were made to competency +to go to credit, and to be weighed in the minds of +the jury after they had heard it.<a name="FNanchor_58_58" id="FNanchor_58_58"></a><a href="#Footnote_58_58" class="fnanchor" title=" Abrahams _v._ Bunn, Burrow, Vol. IV. p. 2254. The whole case +well worth reading.">[58]</a> In objections to +wills, and to the testimony of witnesses to them, he +thought "it clear that the Judges ought to lean +<i>against</i> objections to the formality."<a name="FNanchor_59_59" id="FNanchor_59_59"></a><a href="#Footnote_59_59" class="fnanchor" title=" Wyndham _v._ Chetwynd, Burrow, Vol. I. p. 421.">[59]</a></p> + +<p>Lord Hardwicke had before declared, with great<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_86" id="Page_86">{86}</a></span> +truth, "that the boundaries of what goes to the credit +and what to the competency <i>are very nice, and +the latter carried too far</i>"; and in the same case he +said, "that, unless the objection appeared to him to +carry a strong danger of perjury, and some apparent +advantage might accrue to the witness, he was +always inclined to let it go to his credit, only <i>in order +to let in a proper light to the case, which would +otherwise be shut out</i>; and <i>in a doubtful case</i>, he said, +it was generally his custom <i>to admit the evidence</i>, and +give such directions to the jury as the nature of the +case might require."<a name="FNanchor_60_60" id="FNanchor_60_60"></a><a href="#Footnote_60_60" class="fnanchor" title=" King _v._ Bray.">[60]</a></p> + +<p>It is a known rule of evidence, that an interest in +the matter to be supported by testimony disqualifies +a witness; yet Lord Mansfield held, "that <i>nice</i> objections +to a remote interest which could not be paid or +released, though they held in other cases, were not allowed +to disqualify a witness to a will, as parishioners +might have [prove?] a devise to the use of the poor +of the parish forever." He went still nearer, and his +doctrine tends so fully to settle the principles of departure +from or adherence to rules of evidence, that +your Committee inserts part of the argument at large. +"The disability of a witness from interest is very different +from a positive incapacity. If a deed must be +acknowledged before a judge or notary public, every +other person is under a positive incapacity to authenticate +it; but objections of interest are deductions +from natural reason, and proceed upon a presumption +of too great a bias in the mind of the witness, and +the public utility of rejecting partial testimony. Presumptions +stand no longer than till the contrary is +proved. The presumption of bias may be taken off<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_87" id="Page_87">{87}</a></span> +by showing the witness has a [as?] great or a greater +interest the other way, or that he has given it up. +The presumption of public utility may be answered by +showing that it would be very inconvenient, under +the particular circumstances, not to receive such testimony. +Therefore, from the course of business, necessity, +and other reasons of expedience, <i>numberless +exceptions</i> are allowed to the <i>general</i> rule."<a name="FNanchor_61_61" id="FNanchor_61_61"></a><a href="#Footnote_61_61" class="fnanchor" title=" Wyndham _v._ Chetwynd.">[61]</a></p> + +<p>These being the principles of the latter jurisprudence, +the Judges have suffered no positive rule of +evidence to counteract those principles. They have +even suffered subscribing witnesses to a will which recites +the soundness of mind in the testator to be examined +to prove his insanity, and then the court received +evidence to overturn that testimony and to +destroy the credit of those witnesses. They were five +in number, who attested to a will and codicil. They +were admitted to annul the will they had themselves +attested. Objections were taken to the competency +of one of the witnesses in support of the will against +its subscribing witnesses: 1st, That the witness was +an executor in trust, and so liable to actions; 2dly, +As having acted under the trust, whereby, if the will +were set aside, he would be liable to answer for damages +incurred by the sale of the deceased's chambers +to a Mr. Frederick. Mr. Frederick offered to submit +to a rule to release, for the sake of public justice. +Those who maintained the objection cited Siderfin, +a reporter of much authority, 51, 115, and 1st Keble, +134. Lord Mansfield, Chief-Justice, did not controvert +those authorities; but in the course of obtaining +substantial justice he treated both of them with equal +contempt, though determined by judges of high repu<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_88" id="Page_88">{88}</a></span>tation. +His words are remarkable: "We do not <i>now</i> +sit here to take our rules of evidence from Siderfin +and Keble." He overruled the objection upon more +recent authorities, which, though not in similar circumstances, +he considered as within the reason. The +Court did not think it necessary that the witness +should release, as he had offered to do. "It appeared +on this trial," says Justice Blackstone, "that a black +conspiracy was formed to set aside the gentleman's +will, without any foundation whatever." A prosecution +against three of the testamentary witnesses was +recommended, who were afterwards convicted of perjury.<a name="FNanchor_62_62" id="FNanchor_62_62"></a><a href="#Footnote_62_62" class="fnanchor" title=" Lowe _v._ Joliffe, 1 Black. J. p. 366.">[62]</a> +Had strict formalities with regard to evidence +been adhered to in any part of this proceeding, that +very black conspiracy would have succeeded, and +those black conspirators, instead of receiving the punishment +of their crimes, would have enjoyed the reward +of their perjury.</p> + +<p>Lord Mansfield, it seems, had been misled, in a +certain case, with regard to precedents. His opinion +was against the reason and equity of the supposed +practice, but he supposed himself not at liberty +to give way to his own wishes and opinions. +On discovering his error, he considered himself as +freed from an intolerable burden, and hastened to +undo his former determination. "There are no +precedents," said he, with some exultation, "which +stand in the way of our determining <i>liberally</i>, <i>equitably</i>, +and according to the <i>true</i> intention of the +parties." In the same case, his learned assessor, +Justice Wilmot, felt the same sentiments. His expressions +are remarkable:—"Courts of law ought +to concur with courts of equity in the execution of<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_89" id="Page_89">{89}</a></span> +those powers which are very convenient to be inserted +in settlements; and they ought not to listen +to nice distinctions that savor of the schools, but +to be guided by true good sense and manly reason. +After the Statute of Uses, it is much to be lamented +that the courts of Common Law had not adopted +all the rules and maxims of courts of equity. This +would have prevented the absurdity of receiving costs +in one court and paying them in another."<a name="FNanchor_63_63" id="FNanchor_63_63"></a><a href="#Footnote_63_63" class="fnanchor" title=" Burrow, 1147. Zouch, ex dimiss. Woolston, _v._ Woolston.">[63]</a></p> + +<p>Your Committee does not produce the doctrine +of this particular case as directly applicable to their +charge, no more than several of the others here cited. +We do not know on what precedents or principles +the evidence proposed by us has been deemed inadmissible +by the Judges; therefore against the grounds +of this rejection we find it difficult directly to oppose +anything. These precedents and these doctrines are +brought to show the general temper of the courts, +their growing liberality, and the general tendency of +all their reasonings and all their determinations to +set aside all such technical subtleties or formal rules, +which might stand in the way of the discovery of +truth and the attainment of justice. The cases are +adduced for the principles they contain.</p> + +<p>The period of the cases and arguments we have +cited was that in which large and liberal principles +of evidence were more declared, and more regularly +brought into system. But they had been gradually +improving; and there are few principles of the later +decisions which are not to be found in determinations +on cases prior to the time we refer to. Not to overdo +this matter, and yet to bring it with some degree of +clearness before the House, your Committee will re<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_90" id="Page_90">{90}</a></span>fer +but to a few authorities, and those which seem +most immediately to relate to the nature of the cause +intrusted to them. In Michaelmas, 11 Will. III., +the King <i>v.</i> the Warden of the Fleet, a witness, who +had really been a prisoner, and voluntarily suffered +to escape, was produced to prove the escape. To the +witness it was objected, that he had given a bond to +be a true prisoner, which he had forfeited by escaping: +besides, he had been retaken. His testimony +was allowed; and by the Court, among other things, +it was said, in secret transactions, if any of the parties +concerned are not to be, for the necessity of the +third, admitted as evidence, it will be impossible to +detect the practice: as in cases of the Statute of Hue +and Cry, the party robbed shall be a witness to charge +the hundred; and in the case of Cooke <i>v.</i> Watts in +the Exchequer, where one who had been prejudiced +by the will was admitted an evidence to prove it +forged.<a name="FNanchor_64_64" id="FNanchor_64_64"></a><a href="#Footnote_64_64" class="fnanchor" title=" In this single point Holt did not concur with the rest of the +judges.">[64]</a> So in the case of King <i>v.</i> Parris,<a name="FNanchor_65_65" id="FNanchor_65_65"></a><a href="#Footnote_65_65" class="fnanchor" title=" 1st Siderfin, p. 431.">[65]</a> where a +feme covert was admitted as a witness for <i>fraudulently</i> +drawing her in, when sole, to give a warrant of attorney +for confessing a judgment on an unlawful consideration, +whereby execution was sued out against +her husband, and Holt, Chief-Justice, held that a +feme covert could not, by law, be a witness to convict +one on an information; yet, in Lord Audley's case, +it being a rape on her person, she was received to give +evidence against him, and the Court concurred with +him, because it was the best evidence the nature of +the thing would allow. This decision of Holt refers +to others more early, and all on the same principle;<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_91" id="Page_91">{91}</a></span> +and it is not of this day that this one great principle +of eminent public expedience, this moral necessity, +"that crimes should not escape with impunity,"<a name="FNanchor_66_66" id="FNanchor_66_66"></a><a href="#Footnote_66_66" class="fnanchor" title=" Interest reipublicæ ut maleficia ne remaneant impunita.">[66]</a> has +in all cases overborne all the common juridical rules +of evidence,—it has even prevailed over the first and +most natural construction of acts of Parliament, and +that in matters of so penal a nature as high treason. +It is known that statutes made, not to open and enlarge, +but on fair grounds to straiten proofs, require +two witnesses in cases of high treason. So it was +understood, without dispute and without distinction, +until the argument of a case in the High Court of +Justice, during the Usurpation. It was the case of +the Presbyterian minister, Love, tried for high treason +against the Commonwealth, in an attempt to restore +the King. In this trial, it was contended for, +and admitted, that one witness to one overt act, and +one to another overt act of the same treason, ought to +be deemed sufficient.<a name="FNanchor_67_67" id="FNanchor_67_67"></a><a href="#Footnote_67_67" class="fnanchor" title=" Love's Trial, State Trials, Vol. II. p. 144, 171 to 173, and 177; +and Foster's Crown Law, p. 235.">[67]</a> That precedent, though furnished +in times from which precedents were cautiously +drawn, was received as authority throughout the +whole reign of Charles II.; it was equally followed +after the Revolution; and at this day it is undoubted +law. It is not so from the natural or technical +rules of construction of the act of Parliament, but +from the principles of juridical policy. All the judges +who have ruled it, all the writers of credit who +have written upon it, assign this reason, and this +only,—<i>that treasons, being plotted in secrecy, could +in few cases be otherwise brought to punishment</i>.</p> + +<p>The same principle of policy has dictated a princi<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_92" id="Page_92">{92}</a></span>ple +of relaxation with regard to severe rules of evidence, +in all cases similar, though of a lower order +in the scale of criminality. It is against fundamental +maxims that an accomplice should be admitted +as a witness: but accomplices are admitted from the +policy of justice, otherwise confederacies of crime +could not be dissolved. There is no rule more solid +than that a man shall not entitle himself to profit +by his own testimony. But an informer, in case of +highway robbery, may obtain forty pounds to his own +profit by his own evidence: this is not in consequence +of positive provision in the act of Parliament; it is a +provision of policy, lest the purpose of the act should +be defeated.</p> + +<p>Now, if policy has dictated this very large construction +of an act of Parliament concerning high +treason, if the same policy has dictated exceptions +to the clearest and broadest rules of evidence in +other highly penal causes, and if all this latitude is +taken concerning matters for the greater part within +our insular bounds, your Committee could not, +with safety to the larger and more remedial justice +of the Law of Parliament, admit any rules or pretended +rules, unconnected and uncontrolled by circumstances, +to prevail in a trial which regarded offences +of a nature as difficult of detection, and committed +far from the sphere of the ordinary practice +of our courts.</p> + +<p>If anything of an over-formal strictness is introduced +into the trial of Warren Hastings, Esquire, it +does not seem to be copied from the decisions of +these tribunals. It is with great satisfaction your +Committee has found that the reproach of "disgraceful +subtleties," inferior rules of evidence which pre<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_93" id="Page_93">{93}</a></span>vent +the discovery of truth, of forms and modes of +proceeding which stand in the way of that justice +the forwarding of which is the sole rational object of +their invention, cannot fairly be imputed to the Common +Law of England, or to the ordinary practice of +the courts below.</p> + + +<h3>CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE, ETC.</h3> + +<p>The rules of evidence in civil and in criminal cases, +in law and in equity, being only reason methodized, +are certainly the same. Your Committee, however, +finds that the far greater part of the law of evidence +to be found in our books turns upon questions relative +to civil concerns. Civil cases regard property: now, +although property itself is not, yet almost everything +concerning property and all its modifications is, of +artificial contrivance. The rules concerning it become +more positive, as connected with positive institution. +The legislator therefore always, the jurist +frequently, may ordain certain methods by which +alone they will suffer such matters to be known and +established; because their very essence, for the +greater part, depends on the arbitrary conventions +of men. Men act on them with all the power of a +creator over his creature. They make fictions of law +and presumptions of (<i>præsumptiones juris et de +jure</i>) according to their ideas of utility; and against +those fictions, and against presumptions so created, +they do and may reject all evidence. However, even +in these cases there is some restraint. Lord Mansfield +has let in a liberal spirit against the fictions of +law themselves; and he declared that he would do +what in one case<a name="FNanchor_68_68" id="FNanchor_68_68"></a><a href="#Footnote_68_68" class="fnanchor" title=" Coppendale _v._ Bridgen, 2 Burrow, 814.">[68]</a> he actually did, and most wisely,<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_94" id="Page_94">{94}</a></span> +that he would admit evidence against a fiction of +law, when the fiction militated against the policy on +which it was made.</p> + +<p>Thus it is with things which owe their existence to +men; but where the subject is of a physical nature, +or of a moral nature, independent of their conventions, +men have no other reasonable authority than +to register and digest the results of experience and +observation. Crimes are the actions of physical +beings with an evil intention abusing their physical +powers against justice and to the detriment of society: +in this case fictions of law and artificial presumptions +(<i>juris et de jure</i>) have little or no place. +The presumptions which belong to criminal cases +are those natural and popular presumptions which +are only observations turned into maxims, like adages +and apophthegms, and are admitted (when +their grounds are established) in the place of proof, +where better is wanting, but are to be always over +turned by counter proof.</p> + +<p>These presumptions mostly go to the <i>intention</i>. +In all criminal cases, the crime (except where the +law itself implies malice) consists rather in the intention +than the action. Now the intention is proved +but by two ways: either, 1st, by confession,—this +first case is rare, but simple,—2dly, by circumstantial +proof,—this is difficult, and requires care and +pains. The connection of the intention and the +circumstances is plainly of such a nature as more +to depend on the sagacity of the observer than on +the excellence of any rule. The pains taken by the +Civilians on that subject have not been very fruitful; +and the English law-writers have, perhaps as wisely, +in a manner abandoned the pursuit. In truth, it<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_95" id="Page_95">{95}</a></span> +seems a wild attempt to lay down any rule for the +proof of intention by circumstantial evidence. All +the acts of the party,—all things that explain or +throw light on these acts,—all the acts of others +relative to the affair, that come to his knowledge, +and may influence him,—his friendships and enmities, +his promises, his threats, the truth of his discourses, +the falsehood of his apologies, pretences, and +explanations, his looks, his speech, his silence where +he was called to speak,—everything which tends to +establish the connection between all these particulars,—every +circumstance, precedent, concomitant, +and subsequent, become parts of circumstantial evidence. +These are in their nature infinite, and cannot +be comprehended within any rule or brought under +any classification.</p> + +<p>Now, as the force of that presumptive and conjectural +proof rarely, if ever, depends on one fact only, +but is collected from the number and accumulation +of circumstances concurrent in one point, we do not +find an instance, until this trial of Warren Hastings, +Esquire, (which has produced many novelties,) that +attempts have been made by any court to call on the +prosecutor for an account of the purpose for which +he means to produce each particle of this circumstantial +evidence, to take up the circumstances one +by one, to prejudge the efficacy of each matter separately +in proving the point,—and thus to break to +pieces and to garble those facts, upon the multitude +of which, their combination, and the relation of all +their component parts to each other and to the culprit, +the whole force and virtue of this evidence depends. +To do anything which can destroy this collective +effect is to deny circumstantial evidence.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_96" id="Page_96">{96}</a></span></p> + +<p>Your Committee, too, cannot but express their +surprise at the particular period of the present trial +when the attempts to which we have alluded first +began to be made. The two first great branches of +the accusation of this House against Warren Hastings, +Esquire, relate to public and notorious acts, +capable of direct proof,—such as the expulsion of +Cheyt Sing, with its consequences on the province +of Benares, and the seizure of the treasures and +jaghires of the Begums of Oude. Yet, in the proof +of those crimes, your Committee cannot justly complain +that we were very narrowly circumscribed in +the production of much circumstantial as well as positive +evidence. We did not find any serious resistance +on this head, till we came to make good our +charges of secret crimes,—crimes of a class and +description in the proof of which all judges of all +countries have found it necessary to relax almost all +their rules of competency: such crimes as peculation, +pecuniary frauds, extortion, and bribery. Eight out +of nine of the questions put to the Judges by the +Lords, in the first stage of the prosecution, related to +circumstances offered in proof of these secret crimes.</p> + +<p>Much industry and art have been used, among +the illiterate and unexperienced, to throw imputations +on this prosecution, and its conduct, because +so great a proportion of the evidence offered on this +trial (especially on the latter charges) has been circumstantial. +Against the prejudices of the ignorant +your Committee opposes the judgment of the learned. +It is known to them, that, when this proof is in its +greatest perfection, that is, when it is most abundant +in circumstances, it is much superior to positive +proof; and for this we have the authority of the<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_97" id="Page_97">{97}</a></span> +learned judge who presided at the trial of Captain +Donellan. "On the part of the prosecution, a great +deal of evidence has been laid before you. It is <i>all</i> +circumstantial evidence, and in its nature it must be +so: for, in cases of this sort, no man is weak enough +to commit the act in the presence of other persons, or +to suffer them to see what he does at the time; and +therefore it can only be made out by circumstances, +either before the committing of the act, at the time +when it was committed, or subsequent to it. And +a presumption, which necessarily arises from circumstances, +is very often more convincing and more satisfactory +than any other kind of evidence: because +it is not within the reach and compass of human +abilities to invent a train of circumstances which +shall be so connected together as to amount to a +proof of guilt, without affording opportunities of contradicting +a great part, if not all, of these circumstances. +But if the circumstances are such as, when +laid together, bring conviction to your minds, it is +then fully equal, if not, as I told you before, <i>more</i> +convincing than positive evidence." In the trial of +Donellan no such selection was used as we have lately +experienced; no limitation to the production of +every matter, before, at, and after the fact charged. +The trial was (as we conceive) rightly conducted by +the learned judge; because secret crimes, such as +secret assassination, poisoning, bribery, peculation, +and extortion, (the three last of which this House +has charged upon Mr. Hastings,) can very rarely +be proved in any other way. That way of proof is +made to give satisfaction to a searching, equitable, +and intelligent mind; and there must not be a failure +of justice. Lord Mansfield has said that he did<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_98" id="Page_98">{98}</a></span> +not know a case in which proof might not be supplied.<a name="FNanchor_69_69" id="FNanchor_69_69"></a><a href="#Footnote_69_69" class="fnanchor" title=" Vide supra.">[69]</a></p> + +<p>Your Committee has resorted to the trial of Donellan, +and they have and do much rely upon it, first, +on account of the known learning and ability of the +judge who tried the cause, and the particular attention +he has paid to the subject of evidence, which forms a +book in his treatise on <i>Nisi Prius</i>;—next, because, +as the trial went <i>wholly</i> on circumstantial evidence, +the proceedings in it furnish some of the most complete +and the fullest examples on that subject;—thirdly, +because the case is recent, and the law cannot +be supposed to be materially altered since the time of +that event.</p> + +<p>Comparing the proceedings on that trial, and the +doctrines from the bench, with the doctrines we have +heard from the woolsack, your Committee cannot +comprehend how they can be reconciled. For the +Lords compelled the Managers to declare for what +purpose they produced each separate member of their +circumstantial evidence: a thing, as we conceive, not +usual, and particularly not observed in the trial of +Donellan. We have observed in that trial, and in +most others which we have had occasion to resort to, +that the prosecutor is suffered to proceed narratively +and historically, without interruption. If, indeed, it +appears on the face of the narration that what is represented +to have been said, written, or done did not +come to the knowledge of the prisoner, a question +sometimes, but rarely, has been asked, whether the +prisoner could be affected with the knowledge of it. +When a connection with the person of the prisoner +has been in any way shown, or even promised to be<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_99" id="Page_99">{99}</a></span> +shown, the evidence is allowed to go on without further +opposition. The sending of a sealed letter,—the +receipt of a sealed letter, inferred from the delivery to +the prisoner's servant,—the bare possession of a paper +written by any other person, on the presumption +that the contents of such letters or such paper were +known to the prisoner,—and the being present when +anything was said or done, on the presumption of his +seeing or hearing what passed, have been respectively +ruled to be sufficient. If, on the other hand, no circumstance +of connection has been proved, the judge, +in summing up, has directed the jury to pay no regard +to a letter or conversation the proof of which has so +failed: a course much less liable to inconvenience, +where the same persons decide both the law and the +fact.<a name="FNanchor_70_70" id="FNanchor_70_70"></a><a href="#Footnote_70_70" class="fnanchor" title=" Girdwood's Case, Leach, p. 128. Gordon's Case, Ibid. p. 245. +Lord Preston's Case, St. Tr. IV. p. 439. Layer's Case, St. Tr. VI. +p. 279. Foster's Crown Law, p. 198. Canning's Trial, St. Tr. X. +p. 263, 270. Trial of the Duchess of Kingston, St. Tr. XI. p. 244. +Trial of Huggins, St. Tr. IX. p. 119, 120, 135.">[70]</a></p> + +<p>To illustrate the difficulties to which your Committee +was subjected on this head, we think it sufficient +to submit to the House (reserving a more full discussion +of this important point to another occasion) the +following short statement of an incident which occurred +in this trial.</p> + +<p>By an express order of the Court of Directors, +(to which, by the express words of the act of Parliament +under which he held his office, he was ordered +to yield obedience,) Mr. Hastings and his colleagues +were directed to make an inquiry into all offences +of bribery and corruption in office. On the 11th of +March a charge in writing of bribery and corruption<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_100" id="Page_100">{100}</a></span> +in office was brought against himself. On the 13th +of the same month, the accuser, a man of high rank, +the Rajah Nundcomar, appears personally before the +Council to make good his charge against Mr. Hastings +before his own face. Mr. Hastings thereon fell into +a very intemperate heat, obstinately refused to be present +at the examination, attempted to dissolve the Council, +and contumaciously retired from it. Three of the +other members, a majority of the Council, in execution +of their duty, and in obedience to the orders received +under the act of Parliament, proceeded to take the +evidence, which is very minute and particular, and +was entered in the records of the Council by the +regular official secretary. It was afterwards read in +Mr. Hastings's own presence, and by him transmitted, +under his own signature, to the Court of Directors. +A separate letter was also written by him, about the +same time, desiring, on his part, that, in any inquiry +into his conduct, "not a single word should escape +observation." This proceeding in the Council your +Committee, in its natural order, and in a narrative +chain of circumstantial proof, offered in evidence. It +was not permitted to be read; and on the 20th and +21st of May, 1789, we were told from the woolsack, +"that, when a paper is not evidence by itself," (such +this part of the Consultation, it seems, was reputed,) +"a party who wishes to introduce a paper of that +kind is called upon not only to state, but to make out +on proof, <i>the whole of the grounds upon which he proceeds +to make that paper proper evidence</i>; that the evidence +that is produced must be <i>the demeanor</i> of the +party respecting that paper; and it is the connection +between them, <i>as material to the charge depending</i>, that +will enable them to be produced."<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_101" id="Page_101">{101}</a></span></p> + +<p>Your Committee observes, that this was not a paper +<i>foreign</i> to the prisoner, and sent to him as <i>a letter</i>, +the receipt of which, and his conduct thereon, were +to be brought home to him, to infer his guilt from his +demeanor. It was an office document of his own +department, concerning himself, and kept by officers +of his own, and by himself transmitted, as we have +said, to the Court of Directors. Its proof was in the +record. The charge made against him, and his demeanor +on being acquainted with it, were not in +separate evidence. They all lay together, and composed +a connected narrative of the business, authenticated +by himself.</p> + +<p>In that case it seems to your Committee extremely +irregular and preposterous to demand previous and +extraneous proofs of the demeanor of the party respecting +the paper, and the connection between them, +as <i>material to the charge</i> depending; for this would +be to try what the effect and operation of the evidence +would be on the issue of the cause, before its +production.</p> + +<p>The doctrine so laid down demands that every several +circumstance should in itself be conclusive, or at +least should afford a violent presumption: it must, +we were told, without question, be material to the +charge depending. But, as we conceive, its materiality, +more or less, is not in the first instance to be +established. To make it admissible, it is enough to +give proof, or to raise a legal inference, of its connection +both with the charge depending and the person +of the party charged, where it does not appear on the +face of the evidence offered. Besides, by this new +doctrine, the materiality required to be shown must +be decided from a consideration, not of the whole<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_102" id="Page_102">{102}</a></span> +circumstance, but in truth of one half of the circumstance,—of +a demeanor unconnected with and unexplained +by that on which it arose, though the connection +between the demeanor of the party and the +paper is that which must be shown to be material. +Your Committee, after all they have heard, is yet to +learn how the full force and effect of any demeanor, +as evidence of guilt or innocence, can be known, unless +it be also fully known <i>to what that demeanor applied</i>,—unless, +when a person did or said anything, +it be known, not generally and abstractedly, that a +paper was read to him, but particularly and specifically +<i>what were the contents of that paper</i>: whether +they were matters lightly or weightily alleged,—within +the power of the party accused to have confuted +on the spot, if false,—or such as, though he might +have denied, he could not instantly have disproved. +The doctrine appeared and still appears to your Committee +to be totally abhorrent from the genius of circumstantial +evidence, and mischievously subversive +of its use. We did, however, offer that extraneous +proof which was demanded of us; but it was refused, +as well as the office document.</p> + +<p>Your Committee thought themselves the more +bound to contend for every mode of evidence <i>to the +intention,</i> because in many of the cases the gross fact +was admitted, and the prisoner and his counsel set +up pretences of public necessity and public service for +his justification. No way lay open for rebutting this +justification, but by bringing out all the circumstances +attendant on the transaction.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_103" id="Page_103">{103}</a></span></p> + + +<h3>ORDER AND TIME OF PRODUCING EVIDENCE.</h3> + +<p>Your Committee found great impediment in the +production of evidence, not only on account of the +general doctrines supposed to exist concerning its +inadmissibility, drawn from its own alleged natural +incompetency, or from its inapplicability under the +pleading of the impeachment of this House, but also +from the mode of proceeding in bringing it forward. +Here evidence which we thought necessary to the +elucidation of the cause was not suffered, upon the +supposed rules of <i>examination in chief and cross-examination</i>, +and on supposed rules forming a distinction +between evidence <i>originally</i> produced on the charge +and evidence offered on <i>the reply</i>.</p> + +<p>On all these your Committee observes in general, +that, if the rules which respect the substance of the +evidence are (as the great lawyers on whose authority +we stand assert they are) no more than rules of +convenience, much more are those subordinate rules +which regard the order, the manner, and the time +of the arrangement. These are purely arbitrary, +without the least reference to any fixed principle in +the nature of things, or to any settled maxim of jurisprudence, +and consequently are variable at every +instant, as the conveniencies of the cause may require.</p> + +<p>We admit, that, in the order of mere arrangement, +there is a difference between examination of witnesses +in chief and cross-examination, and that in general +these several parts are properly cast according to the +situation of the parties in the cause; but there neither +is nor can be any precise rule to discriminate +the exact bounds between examination and cross-examination. +So as to time there is necessarily some<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_104" id="Page_104">{104}</a></span> +limit, but a limit hard to fix. The only one which +can be fixed with any tolerable degree of precision +is when the judge, after fully hearing all parties, is +to consider of his verdict or his sentence. Whilst the +cause continues under hearing in any shape, or in any +stage of the process, it is the duty of the judge to +receive every offer of evidence, apparently material, +suggested to him, though the parties themselves, +through negligence, ignorance, or corrupt collusion, +should not bring it forward. A judge is not placed +in that high situation merely as a passive instrument +of parties. He has a duty of his own, independent +of them, and that duty is to investigate the truth. +There may be no prosecutor. In our law a permanent +prosecutor is not of necessity. The Crown prosecutor +in criminal cases is a grand jury; and this is +dissolved instantly on its findings and its presentments. +But if no prosecutor appears, (and it has +happened more than once,) the court is obliged +through its officer, the clerk of the arraigns, to examine +and cross-examine every witness who presents +himself; and the judge is to see it done effectually, +and to act his own part in it,—and this as long as +evidence shall be offered within the time which the +mode of trial will admit.</p> + +<p>Your Committee is of opinion, that, if it has happened +that witnesses, or other kinds of evidence, have +not been frequently produced after the closing of the +prisoner's defence, or such evidence has not been in +reply given, it has happened from the peculiar nature +of our common judicial proceedings, in which all the +matter of evidence must be presented whilst the bodily +force and the memory or other mental faculties +of men can hold out. This does not exceed the<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_105" id="Page_105">{105}</a></span> +compass of one natural day, or thereabouts: during +that short space of time new evidence very rarely occurs +for production by any of the parties; because the +nature of man, joined to the nature of the tribunals, +and of the mode of trial at Common Law, (good and +useful on the whole,) prescribe limits which the mere +principles of justice would of themselves never fix.</p> + +<p>But in other courts, such as the Court of Chancery, +the Courts of Admiralty Jurisdiction, (except in prize +causes under the act of Parliament,) and in the Ecclesiastical +Courts, wherein the trial is not by an inclosed +jury in those courts, such strait limits are not +of course necessary: the cause is continued by many +adjournments; as long as the trial lasts, new witnesses +are examined (even after the regular stage) for +each party, on a special application under the circumstances +to the sound discretion of the court, where +the evidence offered is newly come to the knowledge +or power of the party, and appears on the face of it +to be material in the cause. <i>Even after hearing</i>, new +witnesses have been examined, or former witnesses reëxamined, +not as the right of the parties, but <i>ad informandam +conscientiam judicis</i>.<a name="FNanchor_71_71" id="FNanchor_71_71"></a><a href="#Footnote_71_71" class="fnanchor" title=" Harrison's Practice of Chancery, Vol. II. p. 46. 1 Ch. Ca. 228. +1 Ch. Ca. 25. Oughton, Tit. 81, 82, 83. Do. Tit. 116. Viner, Tit. +Evidence (P. a.).">[71]</a> All these things are +not unfrequent in some, if not in all of these courts, +and perfectly known to the judges of Westminster +Hall; who cannot be supposed ignorant of the practice +of the Court of Chancery, and who sit to try appeals +from the Admiralty and Ecclesiastical Courts as +delegates.</p> + +<p>But as criminal prosecutions according to the forms +of the Civil and Canon Law are neither many nor<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_106" id="Page_106">{106}</a></span> +important in any court of this part of the kingdom, +your Committee thinks it right to state the undisputed +principle of the Imperial Law, from the great +writer on this subject before cited by us,—from Carpzovius. +He says, "that a doubt has arisen, whether, +evidence being once given in a trial on a public prosecution, +(<i>in processu inquisitorio</i>,) and the witnesses +being examined, it may be allowed to form other and +new articles and to produce new witnesses." Your +Committee must here observe, that the <i>processus inquisitorius</i> +is that proceeding in which the prosecution +is carried on in the name of the judge acting <i>ex officio</i>, +from that duty of his office which is called the <i>nobile +officium judicis</i>. For the judge under the Imperial +Law possesses both those powers, the inquisitorial +and the judicial, which in the High Court of Parliament +are more aptly divided and exercised by the +different Houses; and in this kind of process the +House will see that Carpzovius couples the production +of new witnesses and the forming of new articles (the +undoubted privilege of the Commons) as intimately +and necessarily connected. He then proceeds to +solve the doubt. "Certainly," says he, "there are +authors who deny, that, after publication of the depositions, +any new witnesses and proofs that can affect +the prisoner ought to be received; which," says he, +"is true in a case where a private prosecutor has +intervened, who produces the witnesses. But if the +judge proceeds by way of inquisition <i>ex officio</i>, then, +even after the completion of the examination of witnesses +against the prisoner, new witnesses may be received +and examined, and, on new grounds of suspicion +arising, new articles may be formed, according to +the common opinion of the doctors; and as it is the<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_107" id="Page_107">{107}</a></span> +most generally received, so it is most agreeable to +reason."<a name="FNanchor_72_72" id="FNanchor_72_72"></a><a href="#Footnote_72_72" class="fnanchor" title=" Carpz. Pract. Saxon. Crimin. Pars III. Quest. CXIV. No. 13.">[72]</a> And in another chapter, relative to the +ordinary criminal process by a private prosecutor, he +lays it down, on the authority of Angelus, Bartolus, +and others, that, after the right of the party prosecuting +is expired, the judge, taking up the matter <i>ex +officio</i>, may direct new witnesses and new proofs, even +after publication.<a name="FNanchor_73_73" id="FNanchor_73_73"></a><a href="#Footnote_73_73" class="fnanchor" title=" Ibid. Quest. CVI. No. 89.">[73]</a> Other passages from the same +writer and from others might be added; but your +Committee trusts that what they have produced is +sufficient to show the general principles of the Imperial +Criminal Law.</p> + +<p>The High Court of Parliament bears in its modes +of proceeding a much greater resemblance to the +course of the Court of Chancery, the Admiralty, and +Ecclesiastical Courts, (which are the King's courts +too, and their law the law of the land,) than to those +of the Common Law. The accusation is brought into +Parliament, at this very day, by <i>exhibiting articles</i>; +which your Committee is informed is the regular +mode of commencing a criminal prosecution, where +the office of the judge is promoted, in the Civil and +Canon Law courts of this country. The answer, +again, is usually specific, both to the fact and the law +alleged in each particular article; which is agreeable +to the proceeding of the Civil Law, and not of +the Common Law.</p> + +<p>Anciently the resemblance was much nearer and +stronger. Selden, who was himself a great ornament +of the Common Law, and who was personally engaged +in most of the impeachments of his time, has +written expressly on the judicature in Parliament.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_108" id="Page_108">{108}</a></span> +In his fourth chapter, intituled, <i>Of Witnesses</i>, he lays +down the practice of his time, as well as of ancient +times, with respect to the proof by examination; and +it is clearly a practice more similar to that of the +Civil than the Common Law. "The practice at this +day," says he, "is to swear the witnesses in open +House, and then to examine them there, <i>or at a committee</i>, +either upon <i>interrogatories</i> agreed upon in the +House, or such as the committee in their discretion +shall demand. Thus it was in ancient times, as shall +appear by the precedents, so many as they are, they +being very sparing to record those ceremonies, which +I shall briefly recite: I then add those of later +times."</p> + +<p>Accordingly, in times so late as those of the trial +of Lord Middlesex,<a name="FNanchor_74_74" id="FNanchor_74_74"></a><a href="#Footnote_74_74" class="fnanchor" title=" 22 Jac. I. 1624.">[74]</a> upon an impeachment of the +Commons, the whole course of the proceeding, especially +in the mode of adducing the evidence, was +in a manner the same as in the Civil Law: depositions +were taken, and publication regularly passed: +and on the trial of Lord Strafford, both modes pointed +out by Selden seem to have been indifferently used.</p> + +<p>It follows, therefore, that this high court (bound +by none of their rules) has a liberty to adopt the +methods of any of the legal courts of the kingdom +at its discretion; and in <i>sound</i> discretion it ought +to adopt those which bear the nearest resemblance to +its own constitution, to its own procedure, and to +its exigencies in the promotion of justice. There +are conveniencies and inconveniencies both in the +shorter and the longer mode of trial. But to bring +the methods observed (if such are in fact observed) +in the former, only from necessity, into the latter,<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_109" id="Page_109">{109}</a></span> +by choice, is to load it with the inconveniency of +both, without the advantages of either. The chief +benefit of any process which admits of adjournments +is, that it may afford means of fuller information and +more mature deliberation. If neither of the parties +have a strict right to it, yet the court or the jury, +as the case may be, ought to demand it.</p> + +<p>Your Committee is of opinion, that all rules relative +to laches or neglects in a party to the suit, which +may cause nonsuit on the one hand or judgment by +default in the other, all things which cause the party +<i>cadere in jure</i>, ought not to be adhered to in the utmost +rigor, even in civil cases; but still less ought +that spirit which takes advantage of lapses and failures +on either part to be suffered to govern in causes +criminal. "Judges ought to <i>lean</i> against every +attempt to nonsuit a plaintiff on objections which +have no relation to the real merits. It is unconscionable +in a defendant to take advantage of the <i>apices +litigandi</i>: against such objections <i>every possible presumption +ought to be made which ingenuity can suggest</i>. +How disgraceful would it be to the administration +of justice to allow chicane to obstruct +right!"<a name="FNanchor_75_75" id="FNanchor_75_75"></a><a href="#Footnote_75_75" class="fnanchor" title=" Morris _v._ Pugh, Burrow, Vol. III. p. 1243. See also Vol. II. +Alder _v._ Chip; Vol. IV. Dickson _v._ Fisher; Grey _v._ Smythyes.—N.B. +All from the same judge, and proceeding on the same principles.">[75]</a> This observation of Lord Mansfield applies +equally to every means by which, indirectly as +well as directly, the cause may fail upon any other +principles than those of its merits. He thinks that +all the resources of ingenuity ought to be employed +to baffle chicane, not to support it. The case in +which Lord Mansfield has delivered this sentiment<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_110" id="Page_110">{110}</a></span> +is merely a civil one. In civil causes of <i>meum et +tuum</i>, it imports little to the commonwealth, whether +<i>Titus</i> or <i>Mævius</i> profits of a legacy, or whether <i>John +à Nokes</i> or <i>John à Stiles</i> is seized of the manor of +<i>Dale</i>. For which reason, in many cases, the private +interests of men are left by courts to suffer by their +own neglects and their own want of vigilance, as their +fortunes are permitted to suffer from the same causes +in all the concerns of common life. But in crimes, +where the prosecution is on the part of the public, +(as all criminal prosecutions are, except appeals,) +the public prosecutor ought not to be considered as +a plaintiff in a cause of <i>meum et tuum</i>; nor the prisoner, +in such a cause, as a common defendant. In +such a cause the state itself is highly concerned in +the event: on the other hand, the prisoner may lose +life, which all the wealth and power of all the states +in the world cannot restore to him. Undoubtedly +the state ought not to be weighed against justice; +but it would be dreadful indeed, if causes of such +importance should be sacrificed to petty regulations, +of mere secondary convenience, not at all adapted +to such concerns, nor even made with a view to their +existence. Your Committee readily adopts the opinion +of the learned Ryder, that it would be better, +if there were no such rules, than that there should +be no exceptions to them. Lord Hardwicke declared +very properly, in the case of the Earl of Chesterfield +against Sir Abraham Janssen, "that political +arguments, in the fullest sense of the word, as they +concerned the government of a nation, must be, +and always have been, of great weight in the consideration +of this court. Though there be no <i>dolus +malus</i> in contracts, with regard to other persons, yet,<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_111" id="Page_111">{111}</a></span> +if the rest of mankind are concerned as well as the +parties, it may be properly said, it regards the public +utility."<a name="FNanchor_76_76" id="FNanchor_76_76"></a><a href="#Footnote_76_76" class="fnanchor" title=" Chesterfield _v._ Janssen, Atkyns's Reports, Vol. II.">[76]</a> Lord Hardwicke laid this down in a +cause of <i>meum et tuum</i>, between party and party, +where the public was concerned only remotely and +in the example,—not, as in this prosecution, when +the political arguments are infinitely stronger, the +crime relating, and in the most eminent degree relating, +to the public.</p> + +<p>One case has happened since the time which is +limited by the order of the House for this Report: +it is so very important, that we think ourselves justified +in submitting it to the House without delay. +Your Committee, on the supposed rules here alluded +to, has been prevented (as of right) from examining +a witness of importance in the case, and +one on whose supposed knowledge of his most hidden +transactions the prisoner had himself, in all stages of +this business, as the House well knows, endeavored to +raise presumptions in favor of his cause. Indeed, it +was his principal, if not only justification, as to the <i>intention</i>, +in many different acts of corruption charged +upon him. The witness to whom we allude is Mr. +Larkins. This witness came from India after your +Committee had closed the evidence of this House in +chief, and could not be produced before the time of +the reply. Your Committee was not suffered to examine +him,—not, as they could find, on objections to +the particular question as improper, but upon some +or other of the general grounds (as they believe) on +which Mr. Hastings resisted any evidence from him. +The party, after having resisted his production, on +the next sitting day admitted him, and by consent he<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_112" id="Page_112">{112}</a></span> +was examined. Your Committee entered a protest +on the minutes in favor of their right. Your Committee +contended, and do contend, that, by the Law +of Parliament, whilst the trial lasts, they have full +right to call new evidence, as the circumstances may +afford and the posture of the cause may demand it.</p> + +<p>This right seems to have been asserted by the Managers +for the Commons in the case of Lord Stafford, +32 Charles II.<a name="FNanchor_77_77" id="FNanchor_77_77"></a><a href="#Footnote_77_77" class="fnanchor" title=" State Trials, Vol. III. p. 170.">[77]</a> The Managers in that case claimed +it as the right of the Commons to produce witnesses +for the purpose of fortifying their former evidence. +Their claim was admitted by the court. It is an +adjudged case in the Law of Parliament. Your Committee +is well aware that the notorious perjury and +infamy of the witnesses in the trial of Lord Stafford +has been used to throw a shade of doubt and suspicion +on all that was transacted on that occasion. +But there is no force in such an objection. Your +Committee has no concern in the defence of these +witnesses, nor of the Lords who found their verdict +on such testimony, nor of the morality of those who +produced it. Much may be said to palliate errors +on the part of the prosecutors and judges, from the +heat of the times, arising from the great interests +then agitated. But it is plain there may be perjury +in witnesses, or even conspiracy unjustly to prosecute, +without the least doubt of the legality and regularity +of the proceedings in any part. This is too obvious +and too common to need argument or illustration. +The proceeding in Lord Stafford's case never has, now +for an hundred and fourteen years, either in the warm +controversies of parties, or in the cool disquisitions +of lawyers or historians, been questioned. The per<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_113" id="Page_113">{113}</a></span>jury +of the witnesses has been more doubted at some +periods than the regularity of the process has been +at any period. The learned lawyer who led for the +Commons in that impeachment (Serjeant Maynard) +had, near forty years before, taken a forward part in +the great cause of the impeachment of Lord Strafford, +and was, perhaps, of all men then in England, the +most conversant in the law and usage of Parliament. +Jones was one of the ablest lawyers of his age. His +colleagues were eminent men.</p> + +<p>In the trial of Lord Strafford, (which has attracted +the attention of history more than any other, on +account of the importance of the cause itself, the +skill and learning of the prosecutors, and the eminent +abilities of the prisoner,) after the prosecutors for the +Commons had gone through their evidence on the +articles, after the prisoner had also made his defence, +either upon each severally, or upon each body of articles +as they had been collected into one, and the Managers +had in the same manner replied, when, previous +to the general concluding reply of the prosecutors, +the time of the general summing up (or recollection, +as it was called) of the whole evidence on the part of +Lord Strafford arrived, the Managers produced new +evidence. Your Committee wishes to call the particular +attention of the House to this case, as the contest +between the parties did very nearly resemble the +present, but principally because the sense of the Lords +on the Law of Parliament, in its proceedings with regard +to the reception of evidence, is there distinctly +laid down: so is the report of the Judges, relative to +the usage of the courts below, full of equity and +reason, and in perfect conformity with the right for +which we contended in favor of the public, and in<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_114" id="Page_114">{114}</a></span> +favor of the Court of Peers itself. The matter is as +follows. Your Committee gives it at large.</p> + +<p>"After this, the Lord Steward adjourned this +House to Westminster Hall; and the Peers being +all set there in their places, the Lord Steward commanded +the Lieutenant of the Tower to bring forth +the Earl of Strafford to the bar; which being done, +the Lord Steward signified that both sides might +make a recollection of their evidence, and the Earl +of Strafford to begin first.</p> + +<p>"Hereupon Mr. Glynn desired that before the Earl +of Strafford began, that the Commons might produce +two witnesses to the fifteenth and twenty-third articles, +to prove that there be two men whose names are +Berne; and so a mistake will be made clear. The +Earl of Strafford desired that no new witnesses may +be admitted against him, unless he might be permitted +to produce witnesses on his part likewise; which the +Commons consented to, so the Earl of Strafford would +confine himself to those articles upon which he made +reservations: but he not agreeing to that, and the +Commons insisting upon it, the House was adjourned +to the usual place above to consider of it; and after +some debate, their Lordships thought it fit that the +members of the Commons go on in producing new +witnesses, as they shall think fit, to the fifteenth and +twenty-third articles, and that the Earl of Strafford +may presently produce such witnesses as are present, +and such as are not, to name them presently, and to +proceed on Monday next; and also, if the Commons +and Earl of Strafford will proceed upon any other +articles, upon new matter, they are to name the witnesses +and articles on both sides presently, and to +proceed on Monday next: but both sides may waive<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_115" id="Page_115">{115}</a></span> +it, if they will. The Lord Steward adjourned this +House to Westminster Hall, and, being returned +thither, signified what the Lords had thought fit for +the better proceeding in the business. The Earl of +Strafford, upon this, desiring not to be limited to any +reservation, but to be at liberty for what articles are +convenient for him to fortify with new witnesses,<a name="FNanchor_78_78" id="FNanchor_78_78"></a><a href="#Footnote_78_78" class="fnanchor" title=" Bis in originali.">[78]</a> to +which the Commons not assenting, and for other +scruples which did arise in the case, one of the Peers +did desire that the House might be adjourned, to +consider further of the particulars. Hereupon the +Lord Steward adjourned the House to the usual +place above.</p> + +<p>"The Lords, being come up into the House, fell into +debate of the business, and, for the better informing +of their judgments what was the course and common +justice of the kingdom, propounded this question +to the Judges: 'Whether it be according to the course +of practice and common justice, before the Judges in +their several courts, for the prosecutors in behalf of +the King, <i>during the time of trial, to produce witnesses +to discover the truth</i>, and whether the prisoner +may not do the like?' The Lord Chief-Justice delivered +this as the unanimous opinions of himself and +all the rest of the Judges: 'That, according to the +course of practice and common justice, before them +in their several courts, upon trial by jury, <i>as long as +the prisoner is at the bar, and the jury not sent away</i>, +either side may give their evidence and examine witnesses +to discover truth; and this is all the opinion +as we can give concerning the proceedings before us.' +Upon, some consideration after this, the House appointed +the Earl of Bath, Earl of South'ton, Earl of<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_116" id="Page_116">{116}</a></span> +Hartford, Earl of Essex, Earl of Bristol, and the +Lord Viscount Say et Seale to draw up some reasons +upon which the former order was made, which, +being read as followeth, were approved of, as the order +of the House: 'The gentlemen of the House of Commons +did declare, that they challenge to themselves, +by the common justice of the kingdom, that they, +being prosecutors for the King, may bring any new +proofs by witnesses during the time of the evidence +being not fully concluded. The Lords, being judges, +and so equal to them and the prisoner, conceived this +their desire to be just and reasonable; and also that, +by the same common justice, the prisoner may use +the same liberty; and that, to avoid any occasions +of delay, the Lords thought fit that the articles and +witnesses be presently named, and such as may be +presently produced to be used presently, [and such +as cannot to be used on Monday,] and no further +time to be given.' The Lord Steward was to let +them know, that, if they will on both sides waive +the use of new witnesses, they may proceed to the +recollection of their evidence on both sides; if both +sides will not waive it, then the Lord Steward is to +read the precedent order; and if they will not proceed +then, this House is to adjourn and rise."<a name="FNanchor_79_79" id="FNanchor_79_79"></a><a href="#Footnote_79_79" class="fnanchor" title=" Lords' Journals, 17 Ch. I. Die Sabbati, videlicet, 10º die Aprilis.">[79]</a></p> + +<p>By this it will appear to the House how much this +exclusion of evidence, <i>brought for the discovery of truth</i>, +is unsupported either by Parliamentary precedent or +by the rule as understood in the Common Law courts +below; and your Committee (protesting, however, +against being bound by any of the technical rules of +inferior courts) thought, and think, they had a right +to see such a body of precedents and arguments for<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_117" id="Page_117">{117}</a></span> +the rejection of evidence during trial, in some court +or other, before they were in this matter stopped and +concluded.</p> + +<p>Your Committee has not been able to examine every +criminal trial in the voluminous collection of the +State Trials, or elsewhere; but having referred to the +most laborious compiler of law and equity, Mr. Viner, +who has allotted a whole volume to the title of Evidence, +we find but one ruled case in a trial at Common +Law, before or since, where new evidence for +the discovery of truth has been rejected, as not being +in due time. "A privy verdict had been given in B. +R. 14 Eliz. for the defendant; but afterwards, before +the inquest gave their verdict openly, the plaintiff +prayed that he might give more evidence to the jury, +he having (as it seemed) discovered that the jury had +found against him: but the Justices would not admit +him to do so; but after that Southcote J. had been +in C.B. to ask the opinion of the Justices there, they +took the verdict."<a name="FNanchor_80_80" id="FNanchor_80_80"></a><a href="#Footnote_80_80" class="fnanchor" title=" Dal. 80. Pl. 18. Anno 14 Eliz. apud Viner, Evid. p. 60.">[80]</a> In this case the offer of new evidence +was not during the trial. The trial was over; +the verdict was actually delivered to the Judge; there +was also an appearance that the discovery of the +actual finding had suggested to the plaintiff the production +of new evidence. Yet it appeared to the +Judges so strong a measure to refuse evidence, whilst +any, even formal, appearance remained that the trial +was not closed, that they sent a Judge from the bench +into the Common Pleas to obtain the opinion of their +brethren there, before they could venture to take upon +them to consider the time for production of evidence +as elapsed. The case of refusal, taken with +its circumstances, is full as strong an example in<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_118" id="Page_118">{118}</a></span> +favor of the report of the Judges in Lord Strafford's +case as any precedent of admittance can be.</p> + +<p>The researches of your Committee not having furnished +them with any cases in which evidence has +been rejected during the trial, as being out of time, +we have found some instances in which it has been +actually received,—and received not to repel any +new matter in the prisoner's defence, but when the +prisoner had called all his witnesses, and thereby +closed his defence. A remarkable instance occurred +on the trial of Harrison for the murder of Dr. +Clenche. The Justices who tried the cause, viz., +Lord Chief-Justice Holt, and the Justices Atkins and +Nevil, admitted the prosecutor to call new evidence, +for no other reason but that a new witness was then +come into court, who had not been in court before.<a name="FNanchor_81_81" id="FNanchor_81_81"></a><a href="#Footnote_81_81" class="fnanchor" title=" State Trials, Vol. IV. p. 501.">[81]</a> +These Justices apparently were of the same opinion +on this point with the Justices who gave their opinion +in the case of Lord Stafford.</p> + +<p>Your Committee, on this point, as on the former, +cannot discover any authority for the decision of the +House of Lords in the Law of Parliament, or in the +law practice of any court in this kingdom.</p> + + +<h3>PRACTICE BELOW.</h3> + +<p>Your Committee, not having learned that the resolutions +of the Judges (by which the Lords have been +guided) were supported by any authority in law to +which they could have access, have heard by rumor +that they have been justified upon the practice of the +courts in ordinary trials by commission of Oyer and +Terminer. To give any legal precision to this term of<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_119" id="Page_119">{119}</a></span> +<i>practice</i>, as thus applied, your Committee apprehends +it must mean, that the judge in those criminal trials +has so regularly rejected a certain kind of evidence, +when offered there, that it is to be regarded in the +light of a case frequently determined by legal authority. +If such had been discovered, though your Committee +never could have allowed these precedents as +rules for the guidance of the High Court of Parliament, +yet they should not be surprised to see the +inferior judges forming their opinions on their own +confined practice. Your Committee, in their inquiry, +has found comparatively few reports of criminal trials, +except the collection under the title of "State Trials," +a book compiled from materials of very various authority; +and in none of those which we have seen is +there, as appears to us, a single example of the rejection +of evidence similar to that rejected by the advice +of the Judges in the House of Lords. Neither, if such +examples did exist, could your Committee allow them +to apply directly and necessarily, as a measure of reason, +to the proceedings of a court constituted so very +differently from those in which the Common Law is +administered. In the trials below, the Judges decide +on the competency of the evidence before it goes to +the jury, and (under the correctives, in the use of +their discretion, stated before in this Report) with +great propriety and wisdom. Juries are taken promiscuously +from the mass of the people. They are +composed of men who, in many instances, in most +perhaps, never were concerned in any causes, judicially +or otherwise, before the time of their service. +They have generally no previous preparation, or possible +knowledge of the matters to be tried, or what +is applicable or inapplicable to them; and they de<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_120" id="Page_120">{120}</a></span>cide +in a space of time too short for any nice or critical +disquisition. The Judges, therefore, of necessity, +must forestall the evidence, where there is a doubt +on its competence, and indeed observe much on its +credibility, or the most dreadful consequences might +follow. The institution of juries, if not thus qualified, +could not exist. Lord Mansfield makes the +same observation with regard to another corrective +of the short mode of trial,—that of a <i>new trial</i>.</p> + +<p>This is the law, and this its policy. The jury are +not to decide on the competency of witnesses, or of +any other kind of evidence, in any way whatsoever. +Nothing of that kind can come before them. But +the Lords in the High Court of Parliament are not, +either actually or virtually, a jury. No legal power +is interposed between them and evidence; they are +themselves by law fully and exclusively equal to it. +They are persons of high rank, generally of the best +education, and of sufficient knowledge of the world; +and they are a permanent, a settled, a corporate, and +not an occasional and transitory judicature. But it +is to be feared that the authority of the Judges (in +the case of juries legal) may, from that example, +weigh with the Lords further than its reason or its +applicability to the judicial capacity of the Peers can +support. It is to be feared, that if the Lords should +think themselves bound implicitly to submit to this +authority, that at length they may come to think +themselves to be no better than jurors, and may virtually +consent to a partition of that judicature which +the law has left to them whole, supreme, uncontrolled, +and final.</p> + +<p>This final and independent judicature, because it is +final and independent, ought to be very cautious with<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_121" id="Page_121">{121}</a></span> +regard to the rejection of evidence. If incompetent +evidence is received by them, there is nothing to hinder +their judging upon it afterwards according to +its value: it may have no weight in their judgment. +But if, upon advice of others, they previously reject +information necessary to their proper judgment, they +have no intermediate means of setting themselves +right, and they injure the cause of justice without any +remedy. Against errors of juries there is remedy by +a new trial. Against errors of judges there is remedy, +in civil causes, by demurrer and bills of exceptions; +against their final mistake there is remedy by +writ of error, in courts of Common Law. In Chancery +there is a remedy by appeal. If they wilfully +err in the rejection of evidence, there was formerly the +terror existing of punishment by impeachment of the +Commons. But with regard to the Lords, there is no +remedy for error, no punishment for a wilful wrong.</p> + +<p>Your Committee conceives it not improbable that +this apparently total and unreserved submission of +the Lords to the dictates of the judges of the inferior +courts (no proper judges, in any light or in any degree, +of the Law of Parliament) may be owing to the +very few causes of <i>original</i> jurisdiction, and the great +multitude of those of <i>appellate</i> jurisdiction, which +come before them. In cases of appeal, or of error, +(which is in the nature of an appeal,) the court of +appeal is obliged to judge, not by <i>its own</i> rules, acting +in another capacity, or by those which it shall choose +<i>pro re nata</i> to make, but by the rules of the inferior +court from whence the appeal comes. For the fault +or the mistake of the inferior judge is, that he has +not proceeded, as he ought to do, according to the +law which he was to administer; and the correction,<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_122" id="Page_122">{122}</a></span> +if such shall take place, is to compel the court from +whence the appeal comes to act as originally it ought +to have acted, according to law, as the law ought to +have been understood and practised in that tribunal. +The Lords, in such cases of necessity, judge on the +grounds of the law and practice of the courts below; +and this they can very rarely learn with precision, but +from the body of the Judges. Of course much deference +is and ought to be had to their opinions. But +by this means a confusion may arise (if not well +guarded against) between what they do in their <i>appellate</i> +jurisdiction, which is frequent, and what they +ought to do in their <i>original</i> jurisdiction, which is +rare; and by this the whole original jurisdiction of +the Peers, and the whole law and usage of Parliament, +at least in their virtue and spirit, may be considerably +impaired.</p> + +<hr style='width: 45%;' /> + +<p>After having thus submitted to the House the general +tenor of the proceedings in this trial, your Committee +will, with all convenient speed, lay before the +House the proceedings on each head of evidence separately +which has been rejected; and this they hope +will put the House more perfectly in possession of +the principal causes of the length of this trial, as well +as of the injury which Parliamentary justice may, in +their opinion, suffer from those proceedings.</p> + +<div class="footnotes"><h3>FOOTNOTES:</h3> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_1_1" id="Footnote_1_1"></a><a href="#FNanchor_1_1"><span class="label">[1]</span></a> 4 Inst. p. 4.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_2_2" id="Footnote_2_2"></a><a href="#FNanchor_2_2"><span class="label">[2]</span></a> Rol. Parl. Vol. III. p. 244, § 7.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_3_3" id="Footnote_3_3"></a><a href="#FNanchor_3_3"><span class="label">[3]</span></a> 4 Inst. p. 15.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_4_4" id="Footnote_4_4"></a><a href="#FNanchor_4_4"><span class="label">[4]</span></a> 16 Ch. I. 1640.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_5_5" id="Footnote_5_5"></a><a href="#FNanchor_5_5"><span class="label">[5]</span></a> Lords' Journals, Vol. IV. p. 133.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_6_6" id="Footnote_6_6"></a><a href="#FNanchor_6_6"><span class="label">[6]</span></a> Id. Vol. XIX. p. 98.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_7_7" id="Footnote_7_7"></a><a href="#FNanchor_7_7"><span class="label">[7]</span></a> Lords' Journals, Vol. XIX. p. 116.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_8_8" id="Footnote_8_8"></a><a href="#FNanchor_8_8"><span class="label">[8]</span></a> Lords' Journals, Vol. XIX. p. 121.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_9_9" id="Footnote_9_9"></a><a href="#FNanchor_9_9"><span class="label">[9]</span></a> Lords' Journals, Vol. XIX. p. 108.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_10_10" id="Footnote_10_10"></a><a href="#FNanchor_10_10"><span class="label">[10]</span></a> State Trials, Vol. V.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_11_11" id="Footnote_11_11"></a><a href="#FNanchor_11_11"><span class="label">[11]</span></a> Statutes at Large, from 12 Ed. I. to 16 and 17 Ch. II.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_12_12" id="Footnote_12_12"></a><a href="#FNanchor_12_12"><span class="label">[12]</span></a> 7 W. III. ch. 3, sect. 12.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_13_13" id="Footnote_13_13"></a><a href="#FNanchor_13_13"><span class="label">[13]</span></a> State Trials, Vol. VI. p. 17.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_14_14" id="Footnote_14_14"></a><a href="#FNanchor_14_14"><span class="label">[14]</span></a> Lords' Journals, Vol. XX. p. 316.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_15_15" id="Footnote_15_15"></a><a href="#FNanchor_15_15"><span class="label">[15]</span></a> Discourse IV. p. 389.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_16_16" id="Footnote_16_16"></a><a href="#FNanchor_16_16"><span class="label">[16]</span></a> Parl. Rolls, Vol. II. p. 57. 4 Ed. III. A.D. 1330.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_17_17" id="Footnote_17_17"></a><a href="#FNanchor_17_17"><span class="label">[17]</span></a> Coke, 4 Inst. p. 3.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_18_18" id="Footnote_18_18"></a><a href="#FNanchor_18_18"><span class="label">[18]</span></a> State Trials, Vol. II. p. 725. A.D. 1678.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_19_19" id="Footnote_19_19"></a><a href="#FNanchor_19_19"><span class="label">[19]</span></a> State Trials, Vol. III. p. 212.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_20_20" id="Footnote_20_20"></a><a href="#FNanchor_20_20"><span class="label">[20]</span></a> State Trials, Vol. V. p. 169.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_21_21" id="Footnote_21_21"></a><a href="#FNanchor_21_21"><span class="label">[21]</span></a> State Trials, Vol. IV. from p. 538 to 552.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_22_22" id="Footnote_22_22"></a><a href="#FNanchor_22_22"><span class="label">[22]</span></a> State Trials, Vol. IX. p. 606*. Die Lunæ, 28º Julii 1746</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_23_23" id="Footnote_23_23"></a><a href="#FNanchor_23_23"><span class="label">[23]</span></a> Id., Vol. XI. p. 262.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_24_24" id="Footnote_24_24"></a><a href="#FNanchor_24_24"><span class="label">[24]</span></a> Kelyng's Reports, p. 54.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_25_25" id="Footnote_25_25"></a><a href="#FNanchor_25_25"><span class="label">[25]</span></a> Rushworth, Vol. II. pp. 93, 94, 95, 100.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_26_26" id="Footnote_26_26"></a><a href="#FNanchor_26_26"><span class="label">[26]</span></a> Foster's Crown Law, p. 145.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_27_27" id="Footnote_27_27"></a><a href="#FNanchor_27_27"><span class="label">[27]</span></a> See the Appendix, <a href="#No_1">No. 1</a>.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_28_28" id="Footnote_28_28"></a><a href="#FNanchor_28_28"><span class="label">[28]</span></a> Rushworth, Vol. II. p. 475, et passim.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_29_29" id="Footnote_29_29"></a><a href="#FNanchor_29_29"><span class="label">[29]</span></a> Coke, 4 Inst. p. 5.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_30_30" id="Footnote_30_30"></a><a href="#FNanchor_30_30"><span class="label">[30]</span></a> This is confined to the judicial opinions in Hampden's case. +It does not take in all the extra-judicial opinions.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_31_31" id="Footnote_31_31"></a><a href="#FNanchor_31_31"><span class="label">[31]</span></a> "<i>Dissentient.</i> +</p><p> +"1st. Because, by consulting the Judges out of court, in the absence +of the parties, and with shut doors, we have deviated from the most +approved and almost uninterrupted practice of above a century and +a half, and established a precedent not only destructive of the justice +due to the parties at our bar, but materially injurious to the rights +of the community at large, who in cases of impeachments are more +peculiarly interested that all proceedings of this High Court of Parliament +should be open and exposed, like all other courts of justice, +to public observation and comment, in order that no covert and private +practices should defeat the great ends of public justice. +</p><p> +"2dly. Because, from private opinions of the Judges, upon private +statements, which the parties have neither heard nor seen, grounds +of a decision will be obtained which must inevitably affect the cause +at issue at our bar; this mode of proceeding seems to be a violation +of the first principle of justice, inasmuch as we thereby force and confine +the opinions of the Judges to our private statement; and through +the medium of our subsequent decision we transfer the effect of those +opinions to the parties, who have been deprived of the right and advantage +of being heard by such, private, though unintended, transmutation +of the point at issue. +</p><p> +"3dly. Because the prisoners who may hereafter have the misfortune +to stand at our bar will be deprived of that consolation which +the Lord High Steward Nottingham conveyed to the prisoner, Lord +Cornwallis, viz., 'That the Lords have that tender regard of a prisoner +at the bar, that they will not suffer a case to be put in his absence, +lest it should prejudice him by being wrong stated.' +</p><p> +"4thly. Because unusual mystery and secrecy in our judicial proceedings +must tend either to discredit the acquittal of the prisoner, or +render the justice of his condemnation doubtful. +</p><p><span style="margin-left: 8em;">"PORCHESTER.<br /></span> +<span style="margin-left: 8em;">SUFFOLK AND BERKSHIRE.<br /></span> +<span style="margin-left: 8em;">LOUGHBOROUGH."<br /></span> +</p> +</div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_32_32" id="Footnote_32_32"></a><a href="#FNanchor_32_32"><span class="label">[32]</span></a> See the Lord High Steward's speech on that head, 1st James II.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_33_33" id="Footnote_33_33"></a><a href="#FNanchor_33_33"><span class="label">[33]</span></a> All the resolutions of the Judges, to the time of the reference to +the Committee, are in the Appendix, <a href="#No_II">No. 2</a>.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_34_34" id="Footnote_34_34"></a><a href="#FNanchor_34_34"><span class="label">[34]</span></a> Atkyns, Vol. I. p. 445.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_35_35" id="Footnote_35_35"></a><a href="#FNanchor_35_35"><span class="label">[35]</span></a> Blackstone's Commentaries, Book IV. p. 258.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_36_36" id="Footnote_36_36"></a><a href="#FNanchor_36_36"><span class="label">[36]</span></a> Lords' Journals, Vol. IV. p. 204. An. 1641. Rush. Trial of +Lord Strafford, p. 430.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_37_37" id="Footnote_37_37"></a><a href="#FNanchor_37_37"><span class="label">[37]</span></a> Lords' Journals, Vol. IV. p. 210.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_38_38" id="Footnote_38_38"></a><a href="#FNanchor_38_38"><span class="label">[38]</span></a> Id. Vol. XXII. p. 536 to 546. An. 1725.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_39_39" id="Footnote_39_39"></a><a href="#FNanchor_39_39"><span class="label">[39]</span></a> Lords' Journals, Vol. XXII. p. 541.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_40_40" id="Footnote_40_40"></a><a href="#FNanchor_40_40"><span class="label">[40]</span></a> Id. Vol. XXVII. p. 63, 65. An. 1746</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_41_41" id="Footnote_41_41"></a><a href="#FNanchor_41_41"><span class="label">[41]</span></a> Gilbert's Law of Evidence, p. 23.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_42_42" id="Footnote_42_42"></a><a href="#FNanchor_42_42"><span class="label">[42]</span></a> Gravina, 84, 85.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_43_43" id="Footnote_43_43"></a><a href="#FNanchor_43_43"><span class="label">[43]</span></a> Id. 90 usque ad 100.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_44_44" id="Footnote_44_44"></a><a href="#FNanchor_44_44"><span class="label">[44]</span></a> Atkyns, Rep. Vol. I p. 37, Omichund <i>versus</i> Barker.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_45_45" id="Footnote_45_45"></a><a href="#FNanchor_45_45"><span class="label">[45]</span></a> Digest. Lib. XXII. Tit. 5.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_46_46" id="Footnote_46_46"></a><a href="#FNanchor_46_46"><span class="label">[46]</span></a> Calvinus, voce <i>Præsumptio</i>.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_47_47" id="Footnote_47_47"></a><a href="#FNanchor_47_47"><span class="label">[47]</span></a> Bartolus.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_48_48" id="Footnote_48_48"></a><a href="#FNanchor_48_48"><span class="label">[48]</span></a> Lib. II. Obs. 149, § 9.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_49_49" id="Footnote_49_49"></a><a href="#FNanchor_49_49"><span class="label">[49]</span></a> Lib. I. Obs. 91, § 7.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_50_50" id="Footnote_50_50"></a><a href="#FNanchor_50_50"><span class="label">[50]</span></a> Antiqua jurisprudentia aspera quidem illa, tenebricosa, et tristis, +non tam in æquitate quam in verborum superstitione fundata, eaque +Ciceronis ætatem fere attigit, mansitque annos circiter CCCL. Quæ +hanc excepit, viguitque annos fere septuaginta novem, superiori longe +humanior; quippe quæ magis utilitate communi, quam potestate verborum, +negotia moderaretur.—Gravina, p. 86.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_51_51" id="Footnote_51_51"></a><a href="#FNanchor_51_51"><span class="label">[51]</span></a> Omichund <i>v.</i> Barker, Atk. I.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_52_52" id="Footnote_52_52"></a><a href="#FNanchor_52_52"><span class="label">[52]</span></a> Gaill, Lib. II. Obs. 20, § 5.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_53_53" id="Footnote_53_53"></a><a href="#FNanchor_53_53"><span class="label">[53]</span></a> N.B.—In some criminal cases also, though not of treason, husband +is admitted to prove an assault upon his wife, for the King, +ruled by Raymond, Chief-Justice, Trin. 11th Geo., King <i>v.</i> Azire. +And for various other exceptions see Buller's Nisi Prius, 286, 287.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_54_54" id="Footnote_54_54"></a><a href="#FNanchor_54_54"><span class="label">[54]</span></a> Cro. Charl. 365.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_55_55" id="Footnote_55_55"></a><a href="#FNanchor_55_55"><span class="label">[55]</span></a> Omichund <i>v.</i> Barker, 1st Atkyns, ut supra.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_56_56" id="Footnote_56_56"></a><a href="#FNanchor_56_56"><span class="label">[56]</span></a> Rex <i>v.</i> Philips, Burrow, Vol. I. p. 301, 302, 304.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_57_57" id="Footnote_57_57"></a><a href="#FNanchor_57_57"><span class="label">[57]</span></a> Mayor of Hull <i>v.</i> Horner, Cowper's Reports, 109.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_58_58" id="Footnote_58_58"></a><a href="#FNanchor_58_58"><span class="label">[58]</span></a> Abrahams <i>v.</i> Bunn, Burrow, Vol. IV. p. 2254. The whole case +well worth reading.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_59_59" id="Footnote_59_59"></a><a href="#FNanchor_59_59"><span class="label">[59]</span></a> Wyndham <i>v.</i> Chetwynd, Burrow, Vol. I. p. 421.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_60_60" id="Footnote_60_60"></a><a href="#FNanchor_60_60"><span class="label">[60]</span></a> King <i>v.</i> Bray.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_61_61" id="Footnote_61_61"></a><a href="#FNanchor_61_61"><span class="label">[61]</span></a> Wyndham <i>v.</i> Chetwynd.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_62_62" id="Footnote_62_62"></a><a href="#FNanchor_62_62"><span class="label">[62]</span></a> Lowe <i>v.</i> Joliffe, 1 Black. J. p. 366.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_63_63" id="Footnote_63_63"></a><a href="#FNanchor_63_63"><span class="label">[63]</span></a> Burrow, 1147. Zouch, ex dimiss. Woolston, <i>v.</i> Woolston.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_64_64" id="Footnote_64_64"></a><a href="#FNanchor_64_64"><span class="label">[64]</span></a> In this single point Holt did not concur with the rest of the +judges.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_65_65" id="Footnote_65_65"></a><a href="#FNanchor_65_65"><span class="label">[65]</span></a> 1st Siderfin, p. 431.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_66_66" id="Footnote_66_66"></a><a href="#FNanchor_66_66"><span class="label">[66]</span></a> Interest reipublicæ ut maleficia ne remaneant impunita.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_67_67" id="Footnote_67_67"></a><a href="#FNanchor_67_67"><span class="label">[67]</span></a> Love's Trial, State Trials, Vol. II. p. 144, 171 to 173, and 177; +and Foster's Crown Law, p. 235.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_68_68" id="Footnote_68_68"></a><a href="#FNanchor_68_68"><span class="label">[68]</span></a> Coppendale <i>v.</i> Bridgen, 2 Burrow, 814.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_69_69" id="Footnote_69_69"></a><a href="#FNanchor_69_69"><span class="label">[69]</span></a> Vide supra.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_70_70" id="Footnote_70_70"></a><a href="#FNanchor_70_70"><span class="label">[70]</span></a> Girdwood's Case, Leach, p. 128. Gordon's Case, Ibid. p. 245. +Lord Preston's Case, St. Tr. IV. p. 439. Layer's Case, St. Tr. VI. +p. 279. Foster's Crown Law, p. 198. Canning's Trial, St. Tr. X. +p. 263, 270. Trial of the Duchess of Kingston, St. Tr. XI. p. 244. +Trial of Huggins, St. Tr. IX. p. 119, 120, 135.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_71_71" id="Footnote_71_71"></a><a href="#FNanchor_71_71"><span class="label">[71]</span></a> Harrison's Practice of Chancery, Vol. II. p. 46. 1 Ch. Ca. 228. +1 Ch. Ca. 25. Oughton, Tit. 81, 82, 83. Do. Tit. 116. Viner, Tit. +Evidence (P. a.).</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_72_72" id="Footnote_72_72"></a><a href="#FNanchor_72_72"><span class="label">[72]</span></a> Carpz. Pract. Saxon. Crimin. Pars III. Quest. CXIV. No. 13.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_73_73" id="Footnote_73_73"></a><a href="#FNanchor_73_73"><span class="label">[73]</span></a> Ibid. Quest. CVI. No. 89.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_74_74" id="Footnote_74_74"></a><a href="#FNanchor_74_74"><span class="label">[74]</span></a> 22 Jac. I. 1624.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_75_75" id="Footnote_75_75"></a><a href="#FNanchor_75_75"><span class="label">[75]</span></a> Morris <i>v.</i> Pugh, Burrow, Vol. III. p. 1243. See also Vol. II. +Alder <i>v.</i> Chip; Vol. IV. Dickson <i>v.</i> Fisher; Grey <i>v.</i> Smythyes.—N.B. +All from the same judge, and proceeding on the same principles.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_76_76" id="Footnote_76_76"></a><a href="#FNanchor_76_76"><span class="label">[76]</span></a> Chesterfield <i>v.</i> Janssen, Atkyns's Reports, Vol. II.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_77_77" id="Footnote_77_77"></a><a href="#FNanchor_77_77"><span class="label">[77]</span></a> State Trials, Vol. III. p. 170.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_78_78" id="Footnote_78_78"></a><a href="#FNanchor_78_78"><span class="label">[78]</span></a> Bis in originali.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_79_79" id="Footnote_79_79"></a><a href="#FNanchor_79_79"><span class="label">[79]</span></a> Lords' Journals, 17 Ch. I. Die Sabbati, videlicet, 10º die Aprilis.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_80_80" id="Footnote_80_80"></a><a href="#FNanchor_80_80"><span class="label">[80]</span></a> Dal. 80. Pl. 18. Anno 14 Eliz. apud Viner, Evid. p. 60.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_81_81" id="Footnote_81_81"></a><a href="#FNanchor_81_81"><span class="label">[81]</span></a> State Trials, Vol. IV. p. 501.</p></div> +</div> + +<p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_123" id="Page_123">{123}</a></span></p> +<hr style="width: 65%;" /> +<h2><a name="APPENDIX" id="APPENDIX"></a>APPENDIX.</h2> + +<h3><a name="No_1" id="No_1"></a>No. I.<br /> +<br /> +IN THE CASE OF EARL FERRERS.<br /> +<br /> +APRIL 17, 1760.<br /> +<br /> +[Foster's Crown Law, p. 188, fol. edit.]</h3> + + +<p>The House of Peers unanimously found Earl +Ferrers guilty of the felony and murder whereof +he stood indicted, and the Earl being brought to +the bar, the High Steward acquainted him therewith; +and the House immediately adjourned to the Chamber +of Parliament, and, having put the following +question to the Judges, adjourned to the next day.</p> + +<p>"Supposing a peer, so indicted and convicted, +ought by law to receive such judgment as aforesaid, +and the day appointed by the judgment for execution +should lapse before such execution done, whether a +new time may be appointed for the execution, and +by whom?"</p> + +<p>On the 18th, the House then sitting in the Chamber +of Parliament, the Lord Chief Baron, in the absence +of the Chief-Justice of the Common Pleas, delivered +in writing the opinion of the Judges, which they +had agreed on and reduced into form that morning. +His Lordship added many weighty reasons in support +of the opinion, which he urged with great strength and +propriety, and delivered with a becoming dignity.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_124" id="Page_124">{124}</a></span></p> + + +<p class="center"><i>To the Second Question.</i></p> + +<p>"Supposing the day appointed by the judgment +for execution should lapse before such execution +done, (which, however, the law will not presume,) +we are all of opinion that a new time may be appointed +for the execution, either by the High Court +of Parliament, before which such peer shall have +been attainted, or by the Court of King's Bench, the +Parliament not then sitting: the record of the attainder +being properly removed into that court."</p> + +<p>The reasons upon which the Judges founded their +answer to the question relating to the further proceedings +of the House after the High Steward's commission +dissolved, which is usually done upon pronouncing +judgment, may possibly require some further +discussion. I will, therefore, before I conclude, +mention those which weighed with me, and, I believe, +with many others of the Judges.</p> + + +<p class="center"><i>Reasons, &c.</i></p> + +<p>Every proceeding in the House of Peers, acting in +its judicial capacity, whether upon writ of error, impeachment, +or indictment, removed thither by <i>Certiorari</i>, +is in judgment of law a proceeding before the +King in Parliament; and therefore the House, in all +those cases, may not improperly be styled the Court +of our Lord the King in Parliament. This court is +founded upon immemorial usage, upon the law and +custom of Parliament, and is part of the original system +of our Constitution. It is open for all the purposes +of judicature, during the continuance of the +Parliament: it openeth at the beginning and shutteth +at the end of every session: just as the Court of<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_125" id="Page_125">{125}</a></span> +King's Bench, which, is likewise in judgment of law +held before the King himself, openeth and shutteth +with the term. The authority of this court, or, if I +may use the expression, its constant activity for the +ends of public justice, independent of any special +powers derived from the Crown, is not doubted in +the case of writs of error from those courts of law +whence error lieth in Parliament, and of impeachments +for misdemeanors.</p> + +<p>It was formerly doubted, whether, in the case of +an impeachment for treason, and in the case of an +indictment against a peer for any capital crime, +removed into Parliament by <i>Certiorari</i>, whether in +these cases the court can proceed to trial and judgment +without an High Steward appointed by special +commission from the Crown. This doubt seemeth to +have arisen from the not distinguishing between a +proceeding in the Court of the High Steward and +that before the King in Parliament. The name, +style, and title of office is the same in both cases: +but the office, the powers and preëminences annexed +to it, differ very widely; and so doth the constitution +of the courts where the offices are executed. The +identity of the name may have confounded our ideas, +as equivocal words often do, if the nature of things +is not attended to; but the nature of the offices, properly +stated, will, I hope, remove every doubt on these +points.</p> + +<p>In the Court of the High Steward, he alone is +judge in all points of law and practice; the peers +triers are merely judges of fact, and are summoned +by virtue of a precept from the High Steward to +appear before him on the day appointed by him for +the trial, <i>ut rei veritas melius sciri poterit</i>. The High<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_126" id="Page_126">{126}</a></span> +Steward's commission, after reciting that an indictment +hath been found against the peer by the grand +jury of the proper county, impowereth him to send +for the indictment, to convene the prisoner before +him at such day and place as he shall appoint, then +and there to hear and determine the matter of such +indictment; to cause the peers triers, <i>tot et tales, per +quos rei veritas melius sciri poterit</i>, at the same day +and place to appear before him; <i>veritateque inde compertâ</i>, +to proceed to judgment according to the law +and custom of England, and thereupon to award +execution.<a name="FNanchor_82_82" id="FNanchor_82_82"></a><a href="#Footnote_82_82" class="fnanchor" title=" See Lord Clarendon's commission as High Steward, and the +writs and precepts preparatory to the trial, in Lord Morley's case. +VII. St. Tr.">[82]</a> By this it is plain that the sole right +of judicature is in cases of this kind vested in the +High Steward; that it resideth solely in his person; +and consequently, without this commission, which is +but in nature of a commission of Oyer and Terminer, +no one step can be taken in order to a trial; and +that when his commission is dissolved, which he declareth +by breaking his staff, the court no longer existeth.</p> + +<p>But in a trial of a peer in full Parliament, or, +to speak with legal precision, before the King in Parliament, +for a capital offence, whether upon impeachment +or indictment, the case is quite otherwise. +Every peer present at the trial (and every temporal +peer hath a right to be present in every part of the +proceeding) voteth upon every question of law and +fact, and the question is carried by the major vote: +the High Steward himself voting merely as a peer +and member of that court, in common with the rest +of the peers, and in no other right.</p> +<p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_127" id="Page_127">{127}</a></span></p> +<p>It hath, indeed, been usual, and very expedient it +is, in point of order and regularity, and for the solemnity +of the proceeding, to appoint an officer for +presiding during the time of the trial, and until judgment, +and to give him the style and title of Steward +of England: but this maketh no sort of alteration in +the constitution of the court; it is the same court, +founded in immemorial usage, in the law and custom +of Parliament, whether such appointment be made or +not. It acteth in its judicial capacity in every order +made touching the time and place of the trial, the +postponing the trial from time to time upon petition, +according to the nature and circumstances of the case, +the allowance or non-allowance of council to the prisoner, +and other matters relative to the trial;<a name="FNanchor_83_83" id="FNanchor_83_83"></a><a href="#Footnote_83_83" class="fnanchor" title=" See the orders previous to the trial, in the cases of the Lords Kilmarnock, +&c., and Lord Lovat, and many other modern cases.">[83]</a> and +all this before an High Steward hath been appointed. +And so little was it apprehended, in some cases which +I shall mention presently, that the existence of the +court depended on the appointment of an High Steward, +that the court itself directed in what manner and +by what form of words he should be appointed. It +hath likewise received and recorded the prisoner's confession, +which amounteth to a conviction, before the +appointment of an High Steward; and hath allowed +to prisoners the benefit of acts of general pardon, +where they appeared entitled to it, as well without +the appointment of an High Steward as after his +commission dissolved. And when, in the case of impeachments, +the Commons have sometimes, at conferences +between the Houses, attempted to interpose in +matters preparatory to the trial, the general answer +hath been, "This is a point of judicature upon which<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_128" id="Page_128">{128}</a></span> +the Lords will not confer; they impose silence upon +themselves,"—or to that effect. I need not here cite +instances; every man who hath consulted the Journals +of either House hath met with many of them.</p> + +<p>I will now cite a few cases, applicable, in my opinion, +to the present question. And I shall confine myself +to such as have happened since the Restoration; +because, in questions of this kind, modern cases, +settled with deliberation, and upon a view of former +precedents, give more light and satisfaction than the +deepest search into antiquity can afford; and also because +the prerogatives of the Crown, the privileges +of Parliament, and the rights of the subject in general +appear to me to have been more studied and +better understood at and for some years before that +period than in former ages.</p> + +<p>In the case of the Earl of Danby and the Popish +lords then under impeachments, the Lords,<a name="FNanchor_84_84" id="FNanchor_84_84"></a><a href="#Footnote_84_84" class="fnanchor" title=" Lords' Journals.">[84]</a> on the +6th of May, 1679, appointed time and place for hearing +the Earl of Danby, by his council, upon the +validity of his plea of pardon, and for the trials of +the other lords, and voted an address to his Majesty, +praying that he would be pleased to appoint an High +Steward for those purposes. These votes were, on +the next day, communicated to the Commons by +message in the usual manner. On the 8th, at a conference +between the Houses upon the subject-matter +of that message, the Commons expressed themselves +to the following effect:—"They cannot apprehend +what should induce your Lordships to address his +Majesty for an High Steward, for determining the +validity of the pardon which hath been pleaded by +the Earl of Danby, as also for the trial of the other<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_129" id="Page_129">{129}</a></span> +five lords, because they conceive the constituting an +High Steward is not necessary, but that judgment +may be given in Parliament upon impeachment without +an High Steward"; and concluded with a proposition, +that, for avoiding any interruption or delay, a +committee of both Houses might be nominated, to +consider of the most proper ways and methods of +proceeding. This proposition the House of Peers, +after a long debate, rejected: <i>Dissentientibus</i>, Finch,<a name="FNanchor_85_85" id="FNanchor_85_85"></a><a href="#Footnote_85_85" class="fnanchor" title=" Afterwards Earl of Nottingham.">[85]</a> +Chancellor, and many other lords. However, on the +11th, the Commons' proposition of the 8th was upon +a second debate agreed to; and the Lord Chancellor, +Lord President, and ten other lords, were named of +the committee, to meet and confer with a committee +of the Commons. The next day the Lord President +reported, that the committees of both Houses met +that morning, and made an entrance into the business +referred to them: that the Commons desired to see +the commissions that are prepared for an High Steward +at these trials, and also the commissions in the +Lord Pembroke's and the Lord Morley's cases: that to +this the Lords' committees said,—"<i>The High Steward +is but Speaker pro tempore, and giveth his vote as well as +the other lords; this changeth not the nature of the court</i>; +and the Lords declared, they have power enough to +proceed to trial, though the King should not name an +High Steward:<a name="FNanchor_86_86" id="FNanchor_86_86"></a><a href="#Footnote_86_86" class="fnanchor" title=" In the Commons' Journal of the 15th of May it standeth thus:—Their +Lordships further declared to the committee, that a Lord +High Steward, was made _hac vice_ only; that, notwithstanding the making +of a Lord High Steward, the court remained the same, and was not +thereby altered, but still remained the Court of Peers in Parliament; +that the Lord High Steward was but as a Speaker or Chairman, for +the more orderly proceeding at the trials.">[86]</a> that this seemed to be a satisfaction<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_130" id="Page_130">{130}</a></span> +to the Commons, provided it was entered in the Lords' +Journals, which are records." Accordingly, on the +same day, "<i>It is declared and ordered by the Lords +Spiritual and Temporal in Parliament assembled, that +the office of an High Steward, upon trials of peers upon +impeachments, is not necessary to the House of Peers; +but that the Lords may proceed in such trials, if an High +Steward be not appointed according to their humble desire.</i>"<a name="FNanchor_87_87" id="FNanchor_87_87"></a><a href="#Footnote_87_87" class="fnanchor" title=" This resolution my Lord Chief-Baron referred to and cited in +his argument upon the second question proposed to the Judges, which +is before stated.">[87]</a> +On the 13th the Lord President reported, +that the committees of both Houses had met that +morning, and discoursed, in the first place, on the +matter of a Lord High Steward, and had perused +former commissions for the office of High Steward; +and then, putting the House in mind of the order and +resolution of the preceding day, proposed from the +committees that a new commission might issue, so as +the words in the commission may be thus changed: +viz., Instead of, <i>Ac pro eo quod officium Seneschalli +Angliæ, (cujus præsentia in hac parte requiritur,) ut +accepimus, jam vacat</i>, may be inserted, <i>Ac pro eo quod +proceres et magnates in Parliamento nostro assemblati +nobis humiliter supplicaverunt ut Seneschallum Angliæ +pro hac vice constituere dignaremur</i>: to which the +House agreed.<a name="FNanchor_88_88" id="FNanchor_88_88"></a><a href="#Footnote_88_88" class="fnanchor" title=" This amendment arose from an exception taken to the commission +by the committee for the Commons, which, as it then stood, did in +their opinion imply that the constituting a Lord High Steward was +necessary. Whereupon it was agreed by the whole committee of +Lords and Commons, that the commission should be recalled, and a +new commission, according to the said amendment, issue, to bear date +after the order and resolution of the 12th.—_Commons' Journal_ of the +15th of May.">[88]</a></p> + +<p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_131" id="Page_131">{131}</a></span></p><p>It must be admitted that precedents drawn from +times of ferment and jealousy, as these were, lose +much of their weight, since passion and party prejudice +generally mingle in the contest; yet let it be +remembered, that these are resolutions in which both +Houses concurred, and in which the rights of both +were thought to be very nearly concerned,—the +Commons' right of impeaching with effect, and the +whole judicature of the Lords in capital cases. For, +if the appointment of an High Steward was admitted +to be of absolute necessity, (however necessary it +may be for the regularity and solemnity of the proceeding +during the trial and until judgment, which +I do not dispute,) every impeachment may, for a +reason too obvious to be mentioned, be rendered +ineffectual, and the judicature of the Lords in all +capital cases nugatory.</p> + +<p>It was from a jealousy of this kind, not at that +juncture altogether groundless, and to guard against +everything from whence the necessity of an High +Steward in the case of an impeachment might be +inferred, that the Commons proposed and the Lords +readily agreed to the amendment in the Steward's +commission which I have already stated. And it +hath, I confess, great weight with me, that this +amendment, which was at the same time directed +in the cases of the five Popish lords, when commissions +should pass for their trials, hath taken place +in every commission upon impeachments for treason +since that time.<a name="FNanchor_89_89" id="FNanchor_89_89"></a><a href="#Footnote_89_89" class="fnanchor" title=" See, in the State Trials, the commissions in the cases of the Earl +of Oxford, Earl of Derwentwater, and others,—Lord Wintoun and +Lord Lovat.">[89]</a> And I cannot help remarking, +that in the case of Lord Lovat, when neither the heat<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_132" id="Page_132">{132}</a></span> +of the times nor the jealousy of parties had any share +in the proceeding, the House ordered, "That the +commission for appointing a Lord High Steward +shall be in the like form as that for the trial of the +Lord Viscount Stafford, as entered in the Journal +of this House on the 30th of November, 1680: +except that the same shall be in the English language."<a name="FNanchor_90_90" id="FNanchor_90_90"></a><a href="#Footnote_90_90" class="fnanchor" title=" See the proceedings printed by order of the House of Lords, 4th +February, 1746.">[90]</a></p> + +<p>I will make a short observation on this matter. +The order, on the 13th of May, 1679, for varying +the form of the commission, was, as appeareth by the +Journal, plainly made in consequence of the resolution +of the 12th, and was founded on it; and consequently +the constant, unvarying practice with regard +to the new form goeth, in my opinion, a great way +towards showing, that, in the sense of all succeeding +times, that resolution was not the result of faction or +a blamable jealousy, but was founded in sound reason +and true policy. It may be objected, that the +resolution of the 12th of May, 1679, goeth no further +than to a proceeding upon impeachment. The letter +of the resolution, it is admitted, goeth no further. +But this is easily accounted for: a proceeding by impeachment +was the subject-matter of the conference, +and the Commons had no pretence to interpose in +any other. But what say the Lords? <i>The High +Steward is but as a Speaker or Chairman pro tempore, +for the more orderly proceeding at the trials; +the appointment of him doth not alter the nature of +the court, which still remaineth the Court of the Peers +in Parliament.</i> From these premises they draw the +conclusion I have mentioned. Are not these prem<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_133" id="Page_133">{133}</a></span>ises +equally true in the case of a proceeding upon +indictment? They undoubtedly are.</p> + +<p>It must likewise be admitted, that in the proceeding +upon indictment the High Steward's commission +hath never varied from the ancient form in such +cases. The words objected to by the Commons, <i>Ac +pro eo quod officium Seneschalli Angliæ, (cujus præsentia +in hac parte requiritur,) ut accepimus, jam vacat</i>, +are still retained; but this proveth no more than that +the Great Seal, having no authority to vary in point +of form, hath from time to time very prudently followed +ancient precedents.</p> + +<p>I have already stated the substance of the commission +in a proceeding in the Court of the High +Steward. I will now state the substance of that in a +proceeding in the Court of the Peers in Parliament; +and shall make use of that in the case of the Earl of +Kilmarnock and others, as being the latest, and in +point of form agreeing with the former precedents. +The commission, after reciting that William, Earl of +Kilmarnock, &c., stand indicted before commissioners +of gaol-delivery in the County of Surrey, for high +treason, in levying war against the King, and that the +King intendeth that the said William, Earl of Kilmarnock, +&c., shall be heard, examined, sentenced, +and adjudged before himself, in this present Parliament, +touching the said treason, and for that the +office of Steward of Great Britain (whose presence +is required upon this occasion) is now vacant, as we +are informed, appointeth the then Lord Chancellor +Steward of Great Britain, to bear, execute, and exercise +(for this time) the said office, with all things +due and belonging to the same office, in that behalf.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_134" id="Page_134">{134}</a></span></p> + +<p>What, therefore, are the things due and belonging +to the office in a case of this kind? Not, as in the +Court of the High Steward, a right of judicature; for +the commission itself supposeth that right to reside +in a court then subsisting before the King in Parliament. +The parties are to be there heard, sentenced, +and adjudged. What share in the proceeding doth +the High Steward, then, take? By the practice and +usage of the Court of the Peers in Parliament, he +giveth his vote as a member thereof, with the rest of +the peers; but, for the sake of regularity and order, +he presideth during the trial and until judgment, as +Chairman or Speaker <i>pro tempore</i>. In that respect, +therefore, it may be properly enough said, that his +presence is required during the trial and until judgment, +and in no other. Herein I see no difference +between the case of an impeachment and of an indictment. +I say, during the time of the trial and +until judgment; because the court hath, as I observed +before, from time to time done various acts, +plainly judicial, before the appointment of an High +Steward, and where no High Steward hath ever been +appointed, and even after the commission dissolved. +I will to this purpose cite a few cases.</p> + +<p>I begin with the latest, because they are the latest, +and were ruled with great deliberation, and for the +most part upon a view of former precedents. In the +case of the Earl of Kilmarnock and others, the Lords, +on the 24th of June, 1746, ordered that a writ or +writs of <i>Certiorari</i> be issued for removing the indictments +before the House; and on the 26th, the writ, +which is made returnable before the King in Parliament, +with the return and indictments, was received +and read. On the next day, upon the report of the<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_135" id="Page_135">{135}</a></span> +Lords' committees, that they had been attended by +the two Chief-Justices and Chief-Baron, and had +heard them touching the construction of the act of +the 7th and 8th of King William, "for regulating +trials in cases of high treason and misprision of +treason," the House, upon reading the report, came +to several resolutions, founded for the most part +on the construction of that act. What that construction +was appeareth from the Lord High Steward's +address to the prisoners just before their arraignment. +Having mentioned that act as one +happy consequence of the Revolution, he addeth,—"However +injuriously that revolution hath been traduced, +whatever attempts have been made to subvert +this happy establishment founded on it, your Lordships +will now have the benefit of that law in its full +extent."</p> + +<p>I need not, after this, mention any other judicial +acts done by the House in this case, before the appointment +of the High Steward: many there are. +For the putting a construction upon an act relative +to the conduct of the court and the right of the subject +at the trial, and in the proceedings preparatory to +it, and this in a case entirely new, and upon a point, +to say no more in this place, not extremely clear, +was undoubtedly an exercise of authority proper only +for a court having full cognizance of the cause.</p> + +<p>I will not minutely enumerate the several orders +made preparatory to the trial of Lord Lovat, and in +the several cases I shall have occasion to mention, +touching the time and place of the trial, the allowance +or non-allowance of council, and other matters +of the like kind, all plainly judicial; because the like +orders occur in all the cases where a journal of the<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_136" id="Page_136">{136}</a></span> +preparatory steps hath been published by order of the +Peers. With regard to Lord Lovat's case, I think +the order directing the form of the High Steward's +commission, which I have already taken notice of, is +not very consistent with the idea of a court whose +powers can be supposed to depend, at any point of +time, upon the existence or dissolution of that commission.</p> + +<p>In the case of the Earl of Derwentwater and the +other lords impeached at the same time, the House +received and recorded the confessions of those of them +who pleaded guilty, long before the <i>teste</i> of the High +Steward's commission, which issued merely for the solemnity +of giving judgment against them upon their +conviction. This appeareth by the commission itself. +It reciteth, that the Earl of Derwentwater and others, +<i>coram nobis in præsenti Parliamento</i>, had been +impeached by the Commons for high treason, and had, +<i>coram nobis in præsenti Parliamento</i>, pleaded guilty +to that impeachment; and that the King, intending +that the said Earl of Derwentwater and others, <i>de et +pro proditione unde ipsi ut præfertur impetit', accusat', +et convict' existunt coram nobis in præsenti Parliamento, +secundum legem et consuetudinem hujus regni nostri +Magnæ Britanniæ, audientur, sententientur, et adjudicentur</i>, +constituteth the then Lord Chancellor High +Steward (<i>hac vice</i>) to do and execute all things which +to the office of High Steward in that behalf do belong. +The receiving and recording the confession of the +prisoners, which amounted to a conviction, so that +nothing remained but proceeding to judgment, was +certainly an exercise of judicial authority, which no +assembly, how great soever, not having full cognizance +of the cause, could exercise.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_137" id="Page_137">{137}</a></span></p> + +<p>In the case of Lord Salisbury, who had been impeached +by the Commons for high treason, the Lords, +upon his petition, allowed him the benefit of the act +of general pardon passed in the second year of William +and Mary, so far as to discharge him from his imprisonment, +upon a construction they put upon that act, +no High Steward ever having been appointed in that +case. On the 2d of October, 1690, upon reading +the Earl's petition, setting forth that he had been a +prisoner for a year and nine months in the Tower, +notwithstanding the late act of free and general pardon, +and praying to be discharged, the Lords ordered +the Judges to attend on the Monday following, to +give their opinions whether the said Earl be pardoned +by the act. On the 6th the Judges delivered their +opinions, that, if his offence was committed before +the 13th of February, 1688, and not in Ireland or +beyond the seas, he is pardoned. Whereupon it was +ordered that he be admitted to bail, and the next day +he and his sureties entered into a recognizance of bail, +himself in ten thousand pounds, and two sureties in +five thousand pounds each; and on the 30th he and +his sureties were, after a long debate, discharged +from their recognizance.<a name="FNanchor_91_91" id="FNanchor_91_91"></a><a href="#Footnote_91_91" class="fnanchor" title=" See the Journals of the Lords.">[91]</a> It will not be material to +inquire whether the House did right in discharging +the Earl without giving the Commons an opportunity +of being heard; since, in fact, they claimed and exercised +a right of judicature without an High Steward,—which +is the only use I make of this case.</p> + +<p>They did the same in the case of the Earl of Carnwarth, +the Lords Widdrington and Nairn, long after +the High Steward's commission dissolved. These +lords had judgment passed on them at the same time<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_138" id="Page_138">{138}</a></span> +that judgment was given against the Lords Derwentwater, +Nithsdale, and Kenmure; and judgment being +given, the High Steward immediately broke his +staff, and declared the commission dissolved. They +continued prisoners in the Tower under reprieves, +till the passing the act of general pardon, in the 3d +of King George I. On the 21st of November, 1717, +the House being informed that these lords had severally +entered into recognizances before one of the +judges of the Court of King's Bench for their appearance +in the House in this session of Parliament, +and that the Lords Carnwarth and Widdrington were +attending accordingly, and that the Lord Nairn was ill +at Bath and could not then attend, the Lords Carnwarth +and Widdrington were called in, and severally +at the bar prayed that their appearance might be recorded; +and likewise prayed the benefit of the act<a name="FNanchor_92_92" id="FNanchor_92_92"></a><a href="#Footnote_92_92" class="fnanchor" title=" 3 Geo. I. c. 19.">[92]</a> for +his Majesty's general and free pardon. Whereupon +the House ordered that their appearance be recorded, +and that they attend again to-morrow, in order to plead +the pardon; and the recognizance of the Lord Nairn +was respited till that day fortnight. On the morrow +the Lords Carnwarth and Widdrington, then attending, +were called in; and the Lord Chancellor acquainted +them severally, that it appeared by the records +of the House that they severally stood attainted +of high treason, and asked them severally what +they had to say why they should not be remanded +to the Tower of London. Thereupon they severally, +upon their knees, prayed the benefit of the act, and +that they might have their lives and liberty pursuant +thereunto. And the Attorney-General, who then +attended for that purpose, declaring that he had no<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_139" id="Page_139">{139}</a></span> +objection on his Majesty's behalf to what was prayed, +conceiving that those lords, not having made any escape +since their conviction, were entitled to the benefit +of the act, the House, after reading the clause +in the act relating to that matter,<a name="FNanchor_93_93" id="FNanchor_93_93"></a><a href="#Footnote_93_93" class="fnanchor" title=" See sect. 45 of the 3d Geo. I">[93]</a> agreed that they +should be allowed the benefit of the pardon, as to +their lives and liberties, and discharged their recognizances, +and gave them leave to depart without further +day given for their appearance. On the 6th of +December following, the like proceedings were had, +and the like orders made, in the case of Lord Nairn.<a name="FNanchor_94_94" id="FNanchor_94_94"></a><a href="#Footnote_94_94" class="fnanchor" title=" Lords' Journals.">[94]</a></p> + +<p>I observe that the Lord Chancellor did not ask these +lords what they had to say why execution should not +be awarded. There was, it is probable, some little +delicacy as to that point. But since the allowance of +the benefit of the act, as to life and liberty, which +was all that was prayed, was an effectual bar to any +future imprisonment on that account, and also to execution, +and might have been pleaded as such in any +court whatsoever, the whole proceeding must be admitted +to have been in a court having complete jurisdiction +in the case, notwithstanding the High Steward's +commission had been long dissolved,—which +is all the use I intended to make of this case.</p> + +<p>I will not recapitulate: the cases I have cited, and +the conclusions drawn from them, are brought into a +very narrow compass. I will only add, that it would +sound extremely harsh to say, that a court of criminal +jurisdiction, founded in immemorial usage, and +held in judgment of law before the King himself, can +in any event whatever be under an utter incapacity +of proceeding to trial and judgment, either of condemnation +or acquittal, the ultimate objects of every<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_140" id="Page_140">{140}</a></span> +criminal proceeding, without certain supplemental +powers derived from the Crown.</p> + +<p>These cases, with the observations I have made on +them, I hope sufficiently warrant the opinion of the +Judges upon that part of the second question, in the +case of the late Earl Ferrers, which I have already +mentioned,—and also what was advanced by the +Lord Chief-Baron in his argument on that question,—"That, +though the office of High Steward should +happen to determine before execution done according +to the judgment, yet the Court of the Peers in +Parliament, where that judgment was given, would +subsist for all the purposes of justice during the sitting +of the Parliament," and consequently, that, in +the case supposed by the question, that court might +appoint a new day for the execution.</p> + + +<h3><a name="No_II" id="No_II"></a>No. II.</h3> + +<div class="blockquote"><p>QUESTIONS referred by the Lords to the Judges, in +the Impeachment of Warren Hastings, Esquire, and +the Answers of the Judges.—Extracted from the +Lords' Journals and Minutes.</p></div> + + +<p class="center"><i>First.</i></p> + +<p><i>Question.</i>—Whether, when a witness produced and +examined in a criminal proceeding by a prosecutor +disclaims all knowledge of any matter so interrogated, +it be competent for such prosecutor to pursue +such examination, by proposing a question containing +the particulars of an answer supposed to<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_141" id="Page_141">{141}</a></span> +have been made by such witness before a committee +of the House of Commons, or in any other place, +and by demanding of him whether the particulars so +suggested were not the answer he had so made?</p><p style="text-align: right;"> +1788, February 29.—Pa. 418. +</p> + + + +<p><i>Answer.</i>—The Lord Chief-Baron of the Court of +Exchequer delivered the unanimous opinion of the +Judges upon the question of law put to them on +Friday, the 29th of February last, as follows:—"That, +when a witness produced and examined in +a criminal proceeding by a prosecutor disclaims all +knowledge of any matter so interrogated, it is not +competent for such prosecutor to pursue such examination, +by proposing a question containing the +particulars of an answer supposed to have been +made by such witness before a committee of the +House of Commons, or in any other place, and by +demanding of him whether the particulars so suggested +were not the answer he had so made."</p> + +<p style="text-align: right;"> +1788, April 10.—Pa. 592.<br /> +</p> + + +<p class="center"><i>Second.</i></p> + +<p><i>Question.</i>—Whether it be competent for the Managers +to produce an examination taken without oath +by the rest of the Council in the absence of Mr. +Hastings, the Governor-General, charging Mr. Hastings +with corruptly receiving 3,54,105 rupees, which +examination came to his knowledge, and was by +him transmitted to the Court of Directors as a proceeding +of the said Councillors, in order to introduce +the proof of his demeanor thereupon,—it being alleged +by the Managers for the Commons, that he took<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_142" id="Page_142">{142}</a></span> +no steps to clear himself, in the opinion of the said +Directors, of the guilt thereby imputed, but that he +took active means to prevent the examination by the +said Councillors of his servant Cantoo Baboo?</p> + +<p style="text-align: right;"> +1789, May 14—Pa. 677.<br /> +</p> + +<p><i>Answer.</i>—The Lord Chief-Baron of the Court of +Exchequer delivered the unanimous opinion of the +Judges upon the said question, in the negative,—and +gave his reasons.</p> + +<p style="text-align: right;"> +1789, May 20.—Pa. 718.<br /> +</p> + + +<p class="center"><i>Third.</i></p> + +<p><i>Question.</i>—Whether the instructions from the Court +of Directors of the United Company of Merchants of +England trading to the East Indies, to Warren Hastings, +Esquire, Governor-General, Lieutenant-General +John Clavering, the Honorable George Monson, Richard +Barwell, Esquire, and Philip Francis, Esquire, +Councillors, (constituted and appointed the Governor-General +and Council of the said United Company's +Presidency of Fort William in Bengal, by an act of +Parliament passed in the last session, intituled, "An +act for establishing certain regulations for the better +management of the affairs of the East India Company, +as well in India as in Europe,") of the 29th of March, +1774, Par. 31, 32, and 35, the Consultation of the +11th March, 1775, the Consultation of the 13th of +March, 1775, up to the time that Mr. Hastings left +the Council, the Consultation of the 20th of March, +1775, the letter written by Mr. Hastings to the Court +of Directors on the 25th of March, 1775, (it being +alleged that Mr. Hastings took no steps to explain or +defend his conduct,) are sufficient to introduce the<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_143" id="Page_143">{143}</a></span> +examination of Nundcomar, or the proceedings of the +rest of the Councillors, on said 13th of March, after +Mr. Hastings left the Council,—such examination +and proceedings charging Mr. Hastings with, corruptly +receiving 3,54,105 rupees?</p> + +<p style="text-align: right;"> +1789, May 21.—Pa. 730.<br /> +</p> + +<p><i>Answer.</i>—The Lord Chief-Baron of the Court of +Exchequer delivered the unanimous opinion of the +Judges upon the said question, in the negative,—and +gave his reasons.</p> + +<p style="text-align: right;"> +1789, May 27.—Pa. 771.<br /> +</p> + + +<p class="center"><i>Fourth.</i></p> + +<p><i>Question.</i>—Whether the public accounts of the Nizamut +and Bhela, under the seal of the Begum, attested +also by the Nabob, and transmitted by Mr. Goring +to the Board of Council at Calcutta, in a letter bearing +date the 29th June, 1775, received by them, recorded +without objection on the part of Mr. Hastings, +and transmitted by him likewise without objection +to the Court of Directors, and alleged to contain accounts +of money received by Mr. Hastings,—and it +being in proof, that Mr. Hastings, on the 11th of +May, 1778, moved the Board to comply with the +requisitions of the Nabob Mobarek ul Dowlah to reappoint +the Munny Begum and Rajah Gourdas (who +made up those accounts) to the respective offices they +before filled, and which was accordingly resolved by +the Board,—ought to be read?</p> + +<p style="text-align: right;"> +1789, June 17.—Pa. 855.<br /> +</p> + + +<p><i>Answer.</i>—The Lord Chief-Baron of the Court of +Exchequer delivered the unanimous opinion of the<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_144" id="Page_144">{144}</a></span> +Judges upon the said question, in the negative,—and +gave his reasons.</p> + +<p style="text-align: right;"> +1789, June 24.—Pa. 922.<br /> +</p> + + +<p class="center"><i>Fifth.</i></p> + +<p><i>Question.</i>—Whether the paper delivered by Sir Elijah +Impey, on the 7th of July, 1775, in the Supreme +Court, to the Secretary of the Supreme Council, in +order to be transmitted to the Council as the resolution +of the Court in respect to the claim made for +Roy Rada Churn, on account of his being vakeel of +the Nabob Mobarek ul Dowlah,—and which paper +was the subject of the deliberation of the Council on +the 31st July, 1775, Mr. Hastings being then present, +and was by them transmitted to the Court of Directors, +as a ground for such instructions from the Court +of Directors as the occasion might seem to require,—may +be admitted as evidence of the actual state and +situation of the Nabob with reference to the English +government?</p> + +<p style="text-align: right;"> +1789, July 2.—Pa. 1001.<br /> +</p> + +<p><i>Answer.</i>—The Lord Chief-Baron of the Court of +Exchequer delivered the unanimous opinion of the +Judges upon the said question, in the affirmative,—and +gave his reasons.</p> + +<p style="text-align: right;"> +1789, July 7.—Pa. 1030.<br /> +</p> + + +<p class="center"><i>Sixth.</i></p> + +<p><i>Question.</i>—Whether it be or be not competent to +the Managers for the Commons to give evidence upon +the charge in the sixth article, to prove that the rent, +at which the defendant, Warren Hastings, let the +lands mentioned in the said sixth article of charge +to Kelleram, fell into arrear and was deficient,—and<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_145" id="Page_145">{145}</a></span> +whether, if proof were offered, that the rent fell in +arrear immediately after the letting, the evidence +would in that case be competent?</p> + +<p style="text-align: right;"> +1790, April 22.—Pa. 364.<br /> +</p> + +<p><i>Answer.</i>—The lord Chief-Baron of the Court of +Exchequer delivered the unanimous opinion of the +Judges upon the said question,—"That it is not +competent to the Managers for the Commons to give +evidence upon the charge in the sixth article, to prove +that the rent, at which the defendant, Warren Hastings, +let the lands mentioned in the said sixth article +of charge to Kelleram, fell into arrear and was deficient,"—and +gave his reasons.</p> + +<p style="text-align: right;"> +1790, April 27.—Pa. 388.<br /> +</p> + + +<p class="center"><i>Seventh.</i></p> + +<p><i>Question.</i>—Whether it be competent for the Managers +for the Commons to put the following question +to the witness, upon the sixth article of charge, viz.: +"What impression the letting of the lands to Kelleram +and Cullian Sing made on the minds of the inhabitants +of that country"?</p> + +<p style="text-align: right;"> +1790, April 27.—Pa. 391.<br /> +</p> + +<p><i>Answer.</i>—The Lord Chief-Baron of the Court of +Exchequer delivered the unanimous opinion of the +Judges upon the said question,—"That it is not +competent to the Managers for the Commons to put +the following question to the witness, upon the sixth +article of charge, viz.: What impression, the letting +of the lands to Kelleram and Cullian Sing made on +the minds of the inhabitants of that country,"—and +gave his reasons.</p> + +<p style="text-align: right;"> +1790, April 29.—Pa. 413.<br /> +<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_146" id="Page_146">{146}</a></span></p> + + +<p class="center"><i>Eighth.</i></p> + +<p><i>Question.</i>—Whether it be competent to the Managers +for the Commons to put the following question +to the witness, upon the seventh article of charge, +viz.: "Whether more oppressions did actually exist +under the new institution than under the old"?</p> + +<p style="text-align: right;"> +1790, April 29.—Pa. 415.<br /> +</p> + +<p><i>Answer.</i>—The Lord Chief-Baron of the Court of +Exchequer delivered the unanimous opinion of the +Judges upon the said question,—"That it is not +competent to the Managers for the Commons to put +the following question to the witness, upon the +seventh article of charge, viz.: Whether more oppressions +did actually exist under the new institution +than under the old,"—and gave his reasons.</p> + +<p style="text-align: right;"> +1790, May 4.—Pa. 428.<br /> +</p> + + +<p class="center"><i>Ninth.</i></p> + +<p><i>Question.</i>—Whether the letter of the 13th April, +1781, can be given in evidence by the Managers for +the Commons, to prove that the letter of the 5th of +May, 1781, already given in evidence, relative to the +abolition of the Provincial Council and the subsequent +appointment of the Committee of Revenue, was false +in any other particular than that which is charged in +the seventh article of charge?</p> + +<p style="text-align: right;"> +1790, May 20.—Pa. 557.<br /> +</p> + + +<p><i>Answer.</i>—The Lord Chief-Baron of the Court of +Exchequer delivered the unanimous opinion of the +Judges upon the said question,—"That it is not +competent for the Managers on the part of the Commons +to give any evidence on the seventh article of<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_147" id="Page_147">{147}</a></span> +impeachment, to prove that the letter of the 5th of +May, 1781, is false in any other particular than that +wherein it is expressly charged to be false,"—and +gave his reasons.</p> + +<p style="text-align: right;"> +1790, June 2.—Pa. 634.<br /> +</p> + + +<p class="center"><i>Tenth.</i></p> + +<p><i>Question.</i>—Whether it be competent to the Managers +for the Commons to examine the witness to any +account of the debate which was had on the 9th day +of July, 1778, previous to the written minutes that +appear upon the Consultation of that date?</p> + +<p style="text-align: right;"> +1794, February 25.—Lords' Minutes.<br /> +</p> + +<p><i>Answer.</i>—The Lord Chief-Justice of the Court of +Common Pleas delivered the unanimous opinion of +the Judges upon the said question,—"That it is not +competent to the Managers for the Commons to examine +the witness, Philip Francis, Esquire, to any account +of the debate which was had on the 9th day of +July, 1778, previous to the written minutes that appear +upon the Consultation of that date,"—and +gave his reasons.</p> + +<p style="text-align: right;"> +1794, February 27.—Lords' Minutes.<br /> +</p> + + +<p class="center"><i>Eleventh.</i></p> + +<p><i>Question.</i>—Whether it is competent for the Managers +for the Commons, in reply, to ask the witness, +whether, between the time of the original demand +being made upon Cheyt Sing and the period of the +witness's leaving Bengal, it was at any time in his +power to have reversed or put a stop to the demand +upon Cheyt Sing,—the same not being relative to any +matter originally given in evidence by the defendant?</p> + +<p style="text-align: right;"> +1794, February 27.—Lords' Minutes.<br /> +<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_148" id="Page_148">{148}</a></span></p> + +<p><i>Answer.</i>—The Lord Chief-Justice of the Court of +Common Pleas delivered the unanimous opinion of +the Judges upon the said question,—"That it is not +competent for the Managers for the Commons to ask +the witness, whether, between the time of the original +demand being made upon Cheyt Sing and the period +of his leaving Bengal, it was at any time in his power +to have reversed or put a stop to the demand upon +Cheyt Sing,—the same not being relative to any +matter originally given in evidence by the defendant,"—and +gave his reasons.</p> + +<p style="text-align: right;"> +1794, March 1.—Lords' Minutes.<br /> +</p> + + +<p class="center"><i>Twelfth.</i></p> + +<p><i>Question.</i>—Whether a paper, read in the Court of +Directors on the 4th of November, 1783, and then +referred by them to the consideration of the Committee +of the whole Court, and again read in the +Court of Directors on the 19th of November, 1783, +and amended and ordered by them to be published +for the information of the Proprietors, can be received +in evidence, in reply, to rebut the evidence, +given by the defendant, of the thanks of the Court +of Directors, signified to him on the 28th of June, +1785?</p> + +<p style="text-align: right;"> +1794, March 1.—Lords' Minutes.<br /> +</p> + +<p><i>Answer.</i>—Whereupon the Lord Chief-Justice of +the Court of Common Pleas, having conferred with +the rest of the Judges present, delivered their unanimous +opinion upon the said question, in the negative,—and +gave his reasons.</p> + +<p style="text-align: right;"> +1794, March 1.—Lords' Minutes.<br /> +</p> + +<div class="footnotes"><h3>FOOTNOTES:</h3> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_82_82" id="Footnote_82_82"></a><a href="#FNanchor_82_82"><span class="label">[82]</span></a> See Lord Clarendon's commission as High Steward, and the +writs and precepts preparatory to the trial, in Lord Morley's case. +VII. St. Tr.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_83_83" id="Footnote_83_83"></a><a href="#FNanchor_83_83"><span class="label">[83]</span></a> See the orders previous to the trial, in the cases of the Lords Kilmarnock, +&c., and Lord Lovat, and many other modern cases.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_84_84" id="Footnote_84_84"></a><a href="#FNanchor_84_84"><span class="label">[84]</span></a> Lords' Journals.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_85_85" id="Footnote_85_85"></a><a href="#FNanchor_85_85"><span class="label">[85]</span></a> Afterwards Earl of Nottingham.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_86_86" id="Footnote_86_86"></a><a href="#FNanchor_86_86"><span class="label">[86]</span></a> In the Commons' Journal of the 15th of May it standeth thus:—"Their +Lordships further declared to the committee, that a Lord +High Steward, was made <i>hac vice</i> only; that, notwithstanding the making +of a Lord High Steward, the court remained the same, and was not +thereby altered, but still remained the Court of Peers in Parliament; +that the Lord High Steward was but as a Speaker or Chairman, for +the more orderly proceeding at the trials."</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_87_87" id="Footnote_87_87"></a><a href="#FNanchor_87_87"><span class="label">[87]</span></a> This resolution my Lord Chief-Baron referred to and cited in +his argument upon the second question proposed to the Judges, which +is before stated.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_88_88" id="Footnote_88_88"></a><a href="#FNanchor_88_88"><span class="label">[88]</span></a> This amendment arose from an exception taken to the commission +by the committee for the Commons, which, as it then stood, did in +their opinion imply that the constituting a Lord High Steward was +necessary. Whereupon it was agreed by the whole committee of +Lords and Commons, that the commission should be recalled, and a +new commission, according to the said amendment, issue, to bear date +after the order and resolution of the 12th.—<i>Commons' Journal</i> of the +15th of May.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_89_89" id="Footnote_89_89"></a><a href="#FNanchor_89_89"><span class="label">[89]</span></a> See, in the State Trials, the commissions in the cases of the Earl +of Oxford, Earl of Derwentwater, and others,—Lord Wintoun and +Lord Lovat.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_90_90" id="Footnote_90_90"></a><a href="#FNanchor_90_90"><span class="label">[90]</span></a> See the proceedings printed by order of the House of Lords, 4th +February, 1746.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_91_91" id="Footnote_91_91"></a><a href="#FNanchor_91_91"><span class="label">[91]</span></a> See the Journals of the Lords.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_92_92" id="Footnote_92_92"></a><a href="#FNanchor_92_92"><span class="label">[92]</span></a> 3 Geo. I. c. 19.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_93_93" id="Footnote_93_93"></a><a href="#FNanchor_93_93"><span class="label">[93]</span></a> See sect. 45 of the 3d Geo. I</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_94_94" id="Footnote_94_94"></a><a href="#FNanchor_94_94"><span class="label">[94]</span></a> Lords' Journals.</p></div> +</div> + +<p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_149" id="Page_149">{149}</a></span></p> +<hr style="width: 65%;" /> +<h2>REMARKS<br /> +<br /> +<span style="font-size: 50%;">IN</span><br /> +<br /> +<span style="font-size: 75%;">VINDICATION OF THE PRECEDING REPORT.</span></h2> + +<div class="blockquote"> +<p>The preceding Report was ordered to be printed for the +use of the members of the House of Commons, and was +soon afterwards reprinted and published, in the shape of +a pamphlet, by a London bookseller. In the course of a +debate which took place in the House of Lords, on Thursday, +the 22d of May, 1794, on the Treason and Sedition +Bills, Lord Thurlow took occasion to mention "a pamphlet +which his Lordship said was published by one Debrett, of +Piccadilly, and which had that day been put into his hands, +reflecting highly upon the Judges and many members of +that House. This pamphlet was, he said, scandalous and +indecent, and such as he thought ought not to pass unnoticed. +He considered the vilifying and misrepresenting +the conduct of judges and magistrates, intrusted with the +administration of justice and the laws of the country, to +be a crime of a very heinous nature, and most destructive +in its consequences, because it tended to lower them in the +opinion of those who ought to feel a proper reverence and +respect for their high and important stations; and that, +when it was stated to the ignorant or the wicked that their +judges and magistrates were ignorant and corrupt, it tended +to lessen their respect for and obedience to the laws themselves, +by teaching them to think ill of those who admin<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_150" id="Page_150">{150}</a></span>istered +them." On the next day Mr. Burke called the +attention of the House of Commons to this matter, in a +speech to the following effect.</p></div> + +<hr style='width: 45%;' /> + +<p>Mr. Speaker,—The license of the present +times makes it very difficult for us to talk upon +certain subjects in which Parliamentary order is +involved. It is difficult to speak of them with regularity, +or to be silent with dignity and wisdom. All +our proceedings have been constantly published, according +to the discretion and ability of individuals +out of doors, with impunity, almost ever since I came +into Parliament. By usage, the people have obtained +something like a prescriptive right to this +abuse. I do not justify it; but the abuse is now +grown so inveterate that to punish it without previous +notice would have an appearance of hardship, +if not injustice. The publications I allude to are +frequently erroneous as well as irregular, but they +are not always so; what they give as the reports +and resolutions of this House have sometimes been +given correctly. And it has not been uncommon +to attack the proceedings of the House itself under +color of attacking these irregular publications. +Notwithstanding, however, this colorable plea, this +House has in some instances proceeded to punish +the persons who have thus insulted it. You will +here, too, remark, Sir, that, when a complaint is +made of a piratical edition of a work, the authenticity +of the original work is admitted, and whoever +attacks the matter of the work itself in these unauthorized +publications does not attack it less than +if he had attacked it in an edition authorized by +the writer.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_151" id="Page_151">{151}</a></span></p> + +<p>I understand, Sir, that in a place which I greatly +respect, and by a person for whom I have likewise +a great veneration, a pamphlet published by a Mr. +Debrett has been very heavily censured. That pamphlet, +I hear, (for I have not read it,) purports to be +a Report made by one of your Committees to this +House. It has been censured, as I am told, by the +person and in the place I have mentioned, in very +harsh and very unqualified terms. It has been there +said, (and so far very truly,) that at all times, and +particularly at this time, it is necessary, for the preservation +of order and the execution of the law, that +the characters and reputation of the Judges of the +Courts in Westminster Hall should be kept in the +highest degree of respect and reverence; and that in +this pamphlet, described by the name of a libel, the +characters and conduct of those Judges upon a late +occasion have been aspersed, as arising from ignorance +or corruption.</p> + +<p>Sir, combining all the circumstances, I think it +impossible not to suppose that this speech does reflect +upon a Report which, by an order of the Committee +on which I served, I had the honor of presenting +to this House. For anything improper in that +Report I am responsible, as well as the members of +the Committee, to this House, and to this House +only. The matters contained in it, and the observations +upon them, are submitted to the wisdom of the +House, that you may act upon both in the time and +manner that to your judgment may seem most expedient,—or +that you may not act upon them at all, +if you should think that most expedient for the public +good. Your Committee has obeyed your orders; +it has done its duty in making that Report.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_152" id="Page_152">{152}</a></span></p> + +<p>I am of opinion, with the eminent person by whom +that Report is censured, that it is necessary at this +time very particularly that the authority of Judges +should be preserved and supported. This, however, +does not depend so much upon us as upon themselves. +It is necessary to preserve the dignity and +respect of all the constitutional authorities. This, +too, depends in part upon ourselves. It is necessary +to preserve the respect due to the House of Lords: +it is full as necessary to preserve the respect due to +the House of Commons, upon which (whatever may +be thought of us by some persons) the weight and +force of all other authorities within this kingdom +essentially depend. If the power of the House of +Commons be degraded or enervated, no other can +stand. We must be true to ourselves. We ought to +animadvert upon any of our members who abuse the +trust we place in them; we must support those who, +without regard to consequences, perform their duty.</p> + +<p>With regard to the matter which I am now submitting +to your consideration, I must say for your +Committee of Managers and for myself, that the +Report was deliberately made, and does not, as I conceive, +contain any very material error, nor any undue +or indecent reflection upon any person or persons +whatever. It does not accuse the Judges of ignorance +or corruption. Whatever it says it does not +say calumniously. That kind of language belongs +to persons whose eloquence entitles them to a free +use of epithets. The Report states that the Judges +had given their opinions secretly, contrary to the +almost uninterrupted tenor of Parliamentary usage +on such occasions. It states that the mode of giving +the opinions was unprecedented, and contrary to the<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_153" id="Page_153">{153}</a></span> +privileges of the House of Commons. It states that +the Committee did not know upon what rules and +principles the Judges had decided upon those cases, +as they neither heard their opinions delivered, nor +have found them entered upon the Journals of the +House of Lords. It is very true that we were and +are extremely dissatisfied with those opinions, and +the consequent determinations of the Lords; and we +do not think such a mode of proceeding at all justified +by the most numerous and the best precedents. +None of these sentiments is the Committee, as I +conceive, (and I feel as little as any of them,) disposed +to retract, or to soften in the smallest degree.</p> + +<p>The Report speaks for itself. Whenever an occasion +shall be regularly given to maintain everything +of substance in that paper, I shall be ready to meet +the proudest name for ability, learning, or rank that +this kingdom contains, upon that subject. Do I say +this from any confidence in myself? Far from it. +It is from my confidence in our cause, and in the +ability, the learning, and the constitutional principles +which this House contains within itself, and which I +hope it will ever contain,—and in the assistance +which it will not fail to afford to those who with +good intention do their best to maintain the essential +privileges of the House, the ancient law of Parliament, +and the public justice of this kingdom.</p> + +<hr style='width: 25%;' /> + +<p>No reply or observation was made on the subject by any +other member, nor was any farther notice taken of it in the +House of Lords.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_154" id="Page_154">{154}</a></span></p> +<p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_155" id="Page_155">{155}</a></span></p> + + +<hr style="width: 65%;" /> +<h2><a name="SPEECHES" id="SPEECHES"></a>SPEECHES<br /> +<br /> +<span style="font-size: 50%;">IN</span><br /> +<br /> +THE IMPEACHMENT<br /> +<br /> +<span style="font-size: 50%;">OF</span><br /> +<br /> +WARREN HASTINGS, ESQUIRE,<br /> +<br /> +<span style="font-size: 50%;">LATE GOVERNOR-GENERAL OF BENGAL.</span></h2> + +<hr style="width: 25%;" /> +<h2>SPEECH IN GENERAL REPLY.<br /> +<br /> +<span style="font-size: 50%;">MAY AND JUNE, 1794.</span></h2><p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_156" id="Page_156">{156}</a></span></p> +<p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_157" id="Page_157">{157}</a></span></p> + + +<hr style="width: 65%;" /> + +<h2><a name="FIRST_DAY_WEDNESDAY_MAY_28_1794" id="FIRST_DAY_WEDNESDAY_MAY_28_1794"></a>SPEECH<br /> +<br /> +<span style="font-size: 50%;">IN</span><br /> +<br /> +GENERAL REPLY.<br /> +<br /> +<span style="font-size: 50%;">FIRST DAY: WEDNESDAY, MAY 28, 1794</span></h2> + + +<p>My Lords,—This business, which has so long +employed the public councils of this kingdom, +so long employed the greatest and most august of its +tribunals, now approaches to a close. The wreck +and fragments of our cause (which has been dashed +to pieces upon rules by which your Lordships have +thought fit to regulate its progress) await your final +determination. Enough, however, of the matter is +left to call for the most exemplary punishment that +any tribunal ever inflicted upon any criminal. And +yet, my Lords, the prisoner, by the plan of his defence, +demands not only an escape, but a triumph. +It is not enough for him to be acquitted: the Commons +of Great Britain must be condemned; and your +Lordships must be the instruments of his glory and +of our disgrace. This is the issue upon which he has +put this cause, and the issue upon which we are +obliged to take it now, and to provide for it hereafter.</p> + +<p>My Lords, I confess that at this critical moment I +feel myself oppressed with an anxiety that no words +can adequately express. The effect of all our labors, +the result of all our inquiries, is now to be ascertained. +You, my Lords, are now to determine, not +only whether all these labors have been vain and +fruitless, but whether we have abused so long the<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_158" id="Page_158">{158}</a></span> +public patience of our country, and so long oppressed +merit, instead of avenging crime. I confess I tremble, +when I consider that your judgment is now going to +be passed, not on the culprit at your bar, but upon +the House of Commons itself, and upon the public +justice of this kingdom, as represented in this great +tribunal. It is not that culprit who is upon trial; +it is the House of Commons that is upon its trial, it +is the House of Lords that is upon its trial, it is the +British nation that is upon its trial before all other +nations, before the present generation, and before a +long, long posterity.</p> + +<p>My Lords, I should be ashamed, if at this moment +I attempted to use any sort of rhetorical blandishments +whatever. Such artifices would neither be +suitable to the body that I represent, to the cause +which I sustain, or to my own individual disposition, +upon such an occasion. My Lords, we know very +well what these fallacious blandishments too frequently +are. We know that they are used to captivate the +benevolence of the court, and to conciliate the affections +of the tribunal rather to the person than to the +cause. We know that they are used to stifle the remonstrances +of conscience in the judge, and to reconcile +it to the violation of his duty. We likewise know +that they are too often used in great and important +causes (and more particularly in causes like this) to +reconcile the prosecutor to the powerful factions of a +protected criminal, and to the injury of those who +have suffered by his crimes,—thus inducing all parties +to separate in a kind of good humor, as if they +had nothing more than a verbal dispute to settle, or a +slight quarrel over a table to compromise. All this +may now be done at the expense of the persons<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_159" id="Page_159">{159}</a></span> +whose cause we pretend to espouse. We may all +part, my Lords, with the most perfect complacency +and entire good humor towards one another, while +nations, whole suffering nations, are left to beat the +empty air with cries of misery and anguish, and to +cast forth to an offended heaven the imprecations of +disappointment and despair.</p> + +<p>One of the counsel for the prisoner (I think it was +one who has comported himself in this cause with +decency) has told your Lordships that we have come +here on account of <i>some doubts</i> entertained in the +House of Commons concerning the conduct of the +prisoner at your bar,—that we shall be extremely +delighted, when his defence and your Lordships' judgment +shall have set him free, and shall have discovered +to us our error,—that we shall then mutually +congratulate one another,—and that the Commons, +and the Managers who represent them here, will be +the first to rejoice in so happy an event and so fortunate +a discovery.</p> + +<p>Far, far from the Commons of Great Britain be all +manner of real vice; but ten thousand times further +from them, as far as from pole to pole, be the whole +tribe of false, spurious, affected, counterfeit, hypocritical +virtues! These are the things which are ten +times more at war with real virtue, these are the +things which are ten times more at war with real +duty, than any vice known by its name and distinguished +by its proper character. My Lords, far from +us, I will add, be that false and affected candor that +is eternally in treaty with crime,—that half virtue, +which, like the ambiguous animal that flies about +in the twilight of a compromise between day and +night, is to a just man's eye an odious and disgust<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_160" id="Page_160">{160}</a></span>ing +thing! There is no middle point in which the +Commons of Great Britain can meet tyranny and +oppression. No, we never shall (nor can we conceive +that we ever should) pass from this bar, without +indignation, without rage and despair, if the +House of Commons should, upon such a defence as +has here been made against such a charge as they +have produced, be foiled, baffled, and defeated. No, +my Lords, we never could forget it; a long, lasting, +deep, bitter memory of it would sink into our +minds.</p> + +<p>My Lords, the Commons of Great Britain have no +doubt upon this subject. We came hither to call for +justice, not to solve a problem; and if justice be denied +us, the accused is not acquitted, but the tribunal +is condemned. We know that this man is guilty of +all the crimes which he stands accused of by us. We +have not come here to you, in the rash heat of a day, +with that fervor which sometimes prevails in popular +assemblies, and frequently misleads them. No: if +we have been guilty of error in this cause, it is +a deliberate error, the fruit of long, laborious inquiry,—an +error founded on a procedure in Parliament +before we came here, the most minute, the most +circumstantial, and the most cautious that ever was +instituted. Instead of coming, as we did in Lord +Strafford's case, and in some others, voting the impeachment +and bringing it up on the same day, this +impeachment was voted from a general sense prevailing +in the House of Mr. Hastings's criminality +after an investigation begun in the year 1780, and +which produced in 1782 a body of resolutions condemnatory +of almost the whole of his conduct. Those +resolutions were formed by the Lord Advocate of<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_161" id="Page_161">{161}</a></span> +Scotland, and carried in our House by the unanimous +consent of all parties: I mean the then Lord +Advocate of Scotland,—now one of his Majesty's +principal Secretaries of State, and at the head of this +very Indian department. Afterwards, when this defendant +came home, in the year 1785, we reïnstituted +our inquiry. We instituted it, as your Lordships +and the world know, at his own request, made to us +by his agent, then a member of our House. We entered +into it at large; we deliberately moved for every +paper which promised information on the subject. +These papers were not only produced on the part of +the prosecution, as is the case before grand juries, but +the friends of the prisoner produced every document +which they could produce for his justification. We +called all the witnesses which could enlighten us in +the cause, and the friends of the prisoner likewise +called every witness that could possibly throw any +light in his favor. After all these long deliberations, +we referred the whole to a committee. When it had +gone through that committee, and we thought it in a +fit state to be digested into these charges, we referred +the matter to another committee; and the result of +that long examination and the labor of these committees +is the impeachment now at your bar.</p> + +<p>If, therefore, we are defeated here, we cannot plead +for ourselves that we have done this from a sudden +gust of passion, which sometimes agitates and sometimes +misleads the most grave popular assemblies. +No: it is either the fair result of twenty-two years' +deliberation that we bring before you, or what the +prisoner says is just and true,—that nothing but +malice in the Commons of Great Britain could possibly +produce such an accusation as the fruit of such<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_162" id="Page_162">{162}</a></span> +an inquiry. My Lords, we admit this statement, we +are at issue upon this point; and we are now before +your Lordships, who are to determine whether this +man has abused his power in India for fourteen years, +or whether the Commons has abused their power of +inquiry, made a mock of their inquisitorial authority, +and turned it to purposes of private malice and revenge. +We are not come here to compromise matters; +we do not admit [do admit?] that our fame, our +honors, nay, the very inquisitorial power of the House +of Commons is gone, if this man be not guilty.</p> + +<p>My Lords, great and powerful as the House of +Commons is, (and great and powerful I hope it always +will remain,) yet we cannot be insensible to the +effects produced by the introduction of forty millions +of money into this country from India. We know +that the private fortunes which have been made there +pervade this kingdom so universally that there is +not a single parish in it unoccupied by the partisans +of the defendant. We should fear that the faction +which he has thus formed by the oppression of the +people of India would be too strong for the House of +Commons itself, with all its power and reputation, +did we not know that we have brought before you a +cause which nothing can resist.</p> + +<hr style='width: 45%;' /> + +<p>I shall now, my Lords, proceed to state what has +been already done in this cause, and in what condition +it now stands for your judgment.</p> + +<p>An immense mass of criminality was digested by a +committee of the House of Commons; but although +this mass had been taken from another mass still +greater, the House found it expedient to select twenty +specific charges, which they afterwards directed<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_163" id="Page_163">{163}</a></span> +us, their Managers, to bring to your Lordships' bar. +Whether that which has been brought forward on +these occasions or that which was left behind be more +highly criminal, I for one, as a person most concerned +in this inquiry, do assure, your Lordships that it is +impossible for me to determine.</p> + +<p>After we had brought forward this cause, (the +greatest in extent that ever was tried before any human +tribunal, to say nothing of the magnitude of its +consequences,) we soon found, whatever the reasons +might be, without at present blaming the prisoner, +without blaming your Lordships, and far are we from +imputing blame to ourselves, we soon found that +this trial was likely to be protracted to an unusual +length. The Managers of the Commons, feeling this, +went up to their constituents to procure from them +the means of reducing it within a compass fitter for +their management and for your Lordships' judgment. +Being furnished with this power, a second selection +was made upon the principles of the first: not upon +the idea that what we left could be less clearly sustained, +but because we thought a selection should be +made upon some juridical principle. With this impression +on our minds, we reduced the whole cause +to four great heads of guilt and criminality. Two of +them, namely, Benares and the Begums, show the +effects of his open violence and injustice; the other +two expose the principles of pecuniary corruption +upon which the prisoner proceeded: one of these displays +his passive corruption in receiving bribes, and +the other his active corruption, in which he has endeavored +to defend his passive corruption by forming +a most formidable faction both abroad and at home. +There is hardly any one act of the prisoner's corrup<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_164" id="Page_164">{164}</a></span>tion +in which there is not presumptive violence, nor +any acts of his violence in which there are not presumptive +proofs of corruption. These practices are so +intimately blended with each other, that we thought +the distribution which we have adopted would best +bring before you the spirit and genius of his government; +and we were convinced, that, if upon these +four great heads of charge your Lordships should +not find him guilty, nothing could be added to them +which would persuade you so to do.</p> + +<p>In this way and in this state the matter now comes +before your Lordships. I need not tread over the +ground which has been trod with such extraordinary +abilities by my brother Managers, of whom I shall +say nothing more than that the cause has been supported +by abilities equal to it; and, my Lords, no +abilities are beyond it. As to the part which I have +sustained in this procedure, a sense of my own abilities, +weighed with the importance of the cause, would +have made me desirous of being left out of it; but I +had a duty to perform which superseded every personal +consideration, and that duty was obedience to +the House of which I have the honor of being a member. +This is all the apology I shall make. We are +the Commons of Great Britain, and therefore cannot +make apologies. I can make none for my obedience; +they want none for their commands. They gave me +this office, not from any confidence in my ability, but +from a confidence in the abilities of those who were +to assist me, and from a confidence in my zeal,—a +quality, my Lords, which oftentimes supplies the want +of great abilities.</p> + +<p>In considering what relates to the prisoner and to +his defence, I find the whole resolves itself into four<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_165" id="Page_165">{165}</a></span> +heads: first, his demeanor, and his defence in general; +secondly, the principles of his defence; thirdly, +the means of that defence; and, fourthly, the testimonies +which he brings forward to fortify those +means, to support those principles, and to justify that +demeanor.</p> + +<p>As to his demeanor, my Lords, I will venture to +say, that, if we fully examine the conduct of all prisoners +brought before this high tribunal, from the time +that the Duke of Suffolk appeared before it down to +the time of the appearance of my Lord Macclesfield, +if we fully examine the conduct of prisoners in every +station of life, from my Lord Bacon, down to the +smugglers who were impeached in the reign of King +William, I say, my Lords, that we shall not, in the +whole history of Parliamentary trials, find anything +similar to the demeanor of the prisoner at your bar. +What could have encouraged that demeanor your +Lordships will, when you reflect seriously upon this +matter, consider. God forbid that the authority either +of the prosecutor or of the judge should dishearten +the prisoner so as to circumscribe the means +or enervate the vigor of his defence! God forbid +that such a thing should even appear to be desired +by anybody in any British tribunal! But, my Lords, +there is a behavior which broadly displays a want of +sense, a want of feeling, a want of decorum,—a behavior +which indicates an habitual depravity of mind, +that has no sentiments of propriety, no feeling for the +relations of life, no conformity to the circumstances +of human affairs. This behavior does not indicate +the spirit of injured innocence, but the audacity of +hardened, habitual, shameless guilt,—affording legitimate +grounds for inferring a very defective educa<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_166" id="Page_166">{166}</a></span>tion, +very evil society, or very vicious habits of life. +There is, my Lords, a nobleness in modesty, while +insolence is always base and servile. A man who is +under the accusation of his country is under a very +great misfortune. His innocence, indeed, may at +length shine out like the sun, yet for a moment it is +under a cloud; his honor is in abeyance, his estimation +is suspended, and he stands, as it were, a doubtful +person in the eyes of all human society. In that +situation, not a timid, not an abject, but undoubtedly +a modest behavior, would become a person even of +the most exalted dignity and of the firmest fortitude.</p> + +<p>The Romans (who were a people that understood +the decorum of life as well as we do) considered a +person accused to stand in such a doubtful situation +that from the moment of accusation he assumed +either a mourning or some squalid garb, although, +by the nature of their constitution, accusations were +brought forward by one of their lowest magistrates. +The spirit of that decent usage has continued from +the time of the Romans till this very day. No man +was ever brought before your Lordships that did not +carry the outward as well as inward demeanor of +modesty, of fear, of apprehension, of a sense of his +situation, of a sense of our accusation, and a sense +of your Lordships' dignity.</p> + +<p>These, however, are but outward things; they are, +as Hamlet says, "things which a man may play." +But, my Lords, this prisoner has gone a great deal +further than being merely deficient in decent humility. +Instead of defending himself, he has, with +a degree of insolence unparalleled in the history of +pride and guilt, cast out a recriminatory accusation +upon the House of Commons. Instead of considering<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_167" id="Page_167">{167}</a></span> +himself as a person already under the condemnation +of his country, and uncertain whether or not that +condemnation shall receive the sanction of your verdict, +he ranks himself with the suffering heroes of +antiquity. Joining with them, he accuses us, the representatives +of his country, of the blackest ingratitude, +of the basest motives, of the most abominable +oppression, not only of an innocent, but of a most +meritorious individual, who, in your and in our service, +has sacrificed his health, his fortune, and even +suffered his fame and character to be called in question +from one end of the world to the other. This, I +say, he charges upon the Commons of Great Britain; +and he charges it before the Court of Peers of the +same kingdom. Had I not heard this language from +the prisoner, and afterwards from his counsel, I must +confess I could hardly have believed that any man +could so comport himself at your Lordships' bar.</p> + +<p>After stating in his defence the wonderful things +he did for us, he says,—"I maintained the wars +which were of your formation, or that of others, <i>not +of mine</i>. I won one member of the great Indian +confederacy from it by an act of seasonable restitution; +with another I maintained a secret intercourse, +and converted him into a friend; a third I drew off +by diversion and negotiation, and employed him as +the instrument of peace. When <i>you</i> cried out for +peace, and your cries were heard by those who were +the objects of it, I resisted this and every other species +of counteraction by rising in my demands, and +accomplished a peace, and I hope an everlasting one, +with one great state; and I at least afforded the efficient +means by which a peace, if not so durable, more +seasonable at least, was accomplished with another.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_168" id="Page_168">{168}</a></span> +I gave you <i>all</i>; and you have rewarded me with <i>confiscation, +disgrace, and a life of impeachment</i>."</p> + +<p>Comparing our conduct with that of the people of +India, he says,—"<i>They</i> manifested a generosity of +which we have no example in the European world. +Their conduct was the effect of their sense of gratitude +for the benefits they had received from my administration. +I wish I could say as much of my own +countrymen."</p> + +<p>My Lords, here, then, we have the prisoner at your +bar in his demeanor not defending himself, but recriminating +upon his country, charging it with perfidy, +ingratitude, and oppression, and making a comparison +of it with the banians of India, whom he prefers +to the Commons of Great Britain.</p> + +<p>My Lords, what shall we say to this demeanor? +With regard to the charge of using him with ingratitude, +there are two points to be considered. First, +the charge implies that he had rendered great services; +and, secondly, that he has been falsely accused.</p> + +<p>My Lords, as to the great services, they have not, +they cannot, come in evidence before you. If you +have received such evidence, you have received it +obliquely; for there is no other direct proof before +your Lordships of such services than that of there +having been great distresses and great calamities in +India during his government. Upon these distresses +and calamities he has, indeed, attempted to justify +obliquely the corruption that has been charged upon +him; but you have not properly in issue these services. +You cannot admit the evidence of any such +services received directly from him, as a matter of +recriminatory charge upon the House of Commons,<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_169" id="Page_169">{169}</a></span> +because you have not suffered that House to examine +into the validity and merit of this plea. We have +not been heard upon this recriminatory charge, which +makes a considerable part of the demeanor of the +prisoner; we cannot be heard upon it; and therefore +I demand, on the part of the Commons of Great +Britain, that it be dismissed from your consideration: +and this I demand, whether you take it as an attempt +to render odious the conduct of the Commons, whether +you take it in mitigation of the punishment due to +the prisoner for his crimes, or whether it be adduced +as a presumption that so virtuous a servant never +could be guilty of the offences with which we charge +him. In whichever of these lights you may be inclined +to consider this matter, I say you have it not +in evidence before you; and therefore you must expunge +it from your thoughts, and separate it entirely +from your judgment. I shall hereafter have occasion, +to say a few words on this subject of <i>merits</i>. I have +said thus much at present in order to remove extraneous +impressions from your minds. For, admitting +that your Lordships are the best judges, as I well +know that you are, yet I cannot say that you are +not men, and that matter of this kind, however +irrelevant, may not make an impression upon you. +It does, therefore, become us to take some occasional +notice of these supposed services, not in the way of +argument, but with a view by one sort of prejudice +to destroy another prejudice. If there is anything in +evidence which tends to destroy this plea of merits, +we shall recur to that evidence; if there is nothing +to destroy it but argument, we shall have recourse to +that argument; and if we support that argument by +authority and document not in your Lordships' min<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_170" id="Page_170">{170}</a></span>utes, +I hope it will not be the less considered as good +argument because it is so supported.</p> + +<p>I must now call your Lordships' attention from +the vaunted services of the prisoner, which have been +urged to convict us of ingratitude, to another part of +his recriminatory defence. He says, my Lords, that +we have not only oppressed him with unjust charges, +(which is a matter for your Lordships to judge, and +is now the point at issue between us,) but that, instead +of attacking him by fair judicial modes of proceeding, +by stating crimes clearly and plainly, and by proving +those crimes, and showing their necessary consequences, +we have oppressed him with all sorts of foul and +abusive language,—so much so, that every part of +our proceeding has, in the eye of the world, more the +appearance of private revenge than of public justice.</p> + +<p>Against this impudent and calumnious recriminatory +accusation, which your Lordships have thought +good to suffer him to utter here, at a time, too, when +all dignity is in danger of being trodden under foot, +we will say nothing by way of defence. The Commons +of Great Britain, my Lords, are a rustic people: +a tone of rusticity is therefore the proper accent of +their Managers. We are not acquainted with the urbanity +and politeness of extortion and oppression; +nor do we know anything of the sentimental delicacies +of bribery and corruption. We speak the language +of truth, and we speak it in the plain, simple +terms in which truth ought to be spoken. Even +if we have anything to answer for on this head, +we can only answer to the body which we represent +and to that body which hears us: to any others we +owe no apology whatever.</p> + +<p>The prisoner at your bar admits that the crimes<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_171" id="Page_171">{171}</a></span> +which we charge him with are of that atrocity, that, +if brought home to him, he merits death. Yet, +when, in pursuance of our duty, we come to state +these crimes with their proper criminatory epithets, +when we state in strong and direct terms the circumstances +which heighten and aggravate them, when we +dwell on the immoral and heinous nature of the acts, +and the terrible effects which such acts produce, and +when we offer to prove both the principal facts and +the aggravatory ones by evidence, and to show their +nature and quality by the rules of law, morality, and +policy, then this criminal, then his counsel, then his +accomplices and hirelings, posted in newspapers and +dispersed in circles through every part of the kingdom, +represent him as an object of great compassion, +because he is treated, say they, with, nothing but opprobrious +names and scurrilous invectives.</p> + +<p>To all this the Managers of the Commons will say +nothing by way of defence: it would be to betray +their trust, if they did. No, my Lords, they have +another and a very different duty to perform on this +occasion. They are bound not to suffer public opinion, +which often prevents judgment and often defeats +its effects, to be debauched and corrupted. Much +less is this to be suffered in the presence of our coördinate +branch of legislature, and as it were with +your and our own tacit acquiescence. Whenever the +public mind is misled, it becomes the duty of the +Commons of Great Britain to give it a more proper +tone and a juster way of thinking. When ignorance +and corruption have usurped the professor's chair, and +placed themselves in the seats of science and of virtue, +it is high time for us to speak out. We know that +the doctrines of folly are of great use to the <span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_172" id="Page_172">{172}</a></span>professors +of vice. We know that it is one of the signs of +a corrupt and degenerate age, and one of the means +of insuring its further corruption and degeneracy, to +give mild and lenient epithets to vices and to crimes. +The world is much influenced by names. And as +terms are the representatives of sentiments, when +persons who exercise any censorial magistracy seem +in their language to compromise with crimes and +criminals by expressing no horror of the one or detestation +of the other, the world will naturally think +that they act merely to acquit themselves in its sight +in form, but in reality to evade their duty. Yes, my +Lords, the world must think that such persons palter +with their sacred trust, and are tender to crimes because +they look forward to the future possession of +the same power which they now prosecute, and purpose +to abuse it in the manner it has been abused by +the criminal of whom they are so tender.</p> + +<p>To remove such an imputation from us, we assert +that the Commons of Great Britain are not to receive +instructions about the language which they ought to +hold from the gentlemen who have made profitable +studies in the academies of Benares and of Oude. +We know, and therefore do not want to learn, how to +comport ourselves in prosecuting the haughty and +overgrown delinquents of the East. We cannot require +to be instructed by them in what words we +shall express just indignation at enormous crimes; +for we have the example of our great ancestors to +teach us: we tread in their steps, and we speak in +their language.</p> + +<p>Your Lordships well know, for you must be conversant +in this kind of reading, that you once had +before you a man of the highest rank in this country,<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_173" id="Page_173">{173}</a></span> +one of the greatest men of the law and one of the +greatest men of the state, a peer of your own body, +Lord Macclesfield. Yet, my Lords, when that peer +did but just modestly hint that he had received hard +measure from the Commons and their Managers, +those Managers thought themselves bound <i>seriatim</i>, +one after another, to express the utmost indignation +at the charge, in the harshest language that could be +used. Why did they do so? They knew it was the +language that became them. They lived in an age +in which politeness was as well understood and as +much cultivated as it is at present; but they knew +what they were doing, and they were resolved to use +no language but what their ancestors had used, and +to suffer no insolence which their ancestors would +not have suffered. We tread in their steps; we pursue +their method; we learn of them: and we shall +never learn at any other school.</p> + +<p>We know from history and the records of this +House, that a Lord Bacon has been before you. Who +is there, that, upon hearing this name, does not instantly +recognize everything of genius the most profound, +everything of literature the most extensive, everything +of discovery the most penetrating, everything +of observation on human life the most distinguishing +and refined? All these must be instantly recognized, +for they are all inseparably associated with the name +of Lord Verulam. Yet, when this prodigy was +brought before your Lordships by the Commons of +Great Britain for having permitted his menial servant +to receive presents, what was his demeanor? +Did he require his counsel not "to let down the +dignity of his defence"? No. That Lord Bacon, +whose least distinction was, that he was a peer of<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_174" id="Page_174">{174}</a></span> +England, a Lord High Chancellor, and the son of a +Lord Keeper, behaved like a man who knew himself, +like a man who was conscious of merits of the highest +kind, but who was at the same time conscious of having +fallen into guilt. The House of Commons did +not spare him. They brought him to your bar. +They found spots in that sun. And what, I again +ask, was his behavior? That of contrition, that of +humility, that of repentance, that which belongs to +the greatest men lapsed and fallen through human +infirmity into error. He did not hurl defiance at +the accusations of his country; he bowed himself +before it. Yet, with all his penitence, he could not +escape the pursuit of the House of Commons, and +the inflexible justice of this Court. Your Lordships +fined him forty thousand pounds, notwithstanding +all his merits, notwithstanding his humility, notwithstanding +his contrition, notwithstanding the decorum +of his behavior, so well suited to a man under the +prosecution of the Commons of England before the +Peers of England. You fined him in a sum fully +equal to one hundred thousand pounds of the present +day; you imprisoned him during the King's pleasure; +and you disqualified him forever from having a +seat in this House and any office in this kingdom. +This is the way in which the Commons behaved formerly, +and in which your Lordships acted formerly, +when no culprit at this bar dared to hurl a recriminatory +accusation against his prosecutors, or dared +to censure the language in which they expressed their +indignation at his crimes.</p> + +<p>The Commons of Great Britain, following these +examples and fortified by them, abhor all compromise +with guilt either in act or in language. They<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_175" id="Page_175">{175}</a></span> +will not disclaim any one word that they have spoken, +because, my Lords, they have said nothing abusive +or illiberal. It has been, said that we have used +such language as was used to Sir Walter Raleigh, +when he was called, not by the Commons, but by a +certain person of a learned profession, "a spider of +hell." My Lords, Sir Walter was a great soldier, a +great mariner, and one of the first scholars of his +age. To call him a spider of hell was not only indecent +in itself, but perfectly foolish, from the term being +totally inapplicable to the object, and fit only for +the very pedantic eloquence of the person who used +it. But if Sir Walter Raleigh had been guilty of +numberless frauds and prevarications, if he had clandestinely +picked up other men's money, concealed his +peculation by false bonds, and afterwards attempted +to cover it by the cobwebs of the law, then my +Lord Coke would have trespassed a great deal more +against decorum than against propriety of similitude +and metaphor.</p> + +<p>My Lords, the Managers for the Commons have +not used any <i>inapplicable</i> language. We have indeed +used, and will again use, such expressions as are +proper to portray guilt. After describing the magnitude +of the crime, we describe the magnitude of the +criminal. We have declared him to be not only a +public robber himself, but the head of a system of +robbery, the captain-general of the gang, the chief +under whom a whole predatory band was arrayed, +disciplined, and paid. This, my Lords, is what we +offered to prove fully to you, what in part we have +proved, and the whole of which I believe we could +prove. In developing such a mass of criminality +and in describing a criminal of such magnitude as<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_176" id="Page_176">{176}</a></span> +we have now brought before you, we could not use +lenient epithets without compromising with crime. +We therefore shall not relax in our pursuits nor in +our language. No, my Lords, no! we shall not fail +to feel indignation, wherever our moral nature has +taught us to feel it; nor shall we hesitate to speak +the language which is dictated by that indignation. +Whenever men are oppressed where they ought to be +protected, we called [call?] it tyranny, and we call +the actor a tyrant. Whenever goods are taken by violence +from the possessor, we call it a robbery, and the +person who takes it we call a robber. Money clandestinely +taken from the proprietor we call theft, and the +person who takes it we call a thief. When a false +paper is made out to obtain money, we call the act +a forgery. That steward who takes bribes from his +master's tenants, and then, pretending the money to +be his own, lends it to that master and takes bonds +for it to himself, we consider guilty of a breach of +trust; and the person who commits such crimes we +call a cheat, a swindler, and a forger of bonds. All +these offences, without the least softening, under all +these names, we charge upon this man. We have so +charged in our record, we have so charged in our +speeches; and we are sorry that our language does +not furnish terms of sufficient force and compass to +mark the multitude, the magnitude, and the atrocity +of his crimes.</p> + +<p>How came it, then, that the Commons of Great +Britain should be calumniated for the course which +they have taken? Why should it ever have been +supposed that we are actuated by revenge? I answer, +There are two very sufficient causes: corruption +and ignorance. The first disposes an <span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_177" id="Page_177">{177}</a></span>innumerable +multitude of people to a fellow-feeling with the +prisoner. Under the shadow of his crimes thousands +of fortunes have been made; and therefore thousands +of tongues are employed to justify the means +by which these fortunes were made. When they cannot +deny the facts, they attack the accusers,—they +attack their conduct, they attack their persons, they +attack their language, in every possible manner. I +have said, my Lords, that ignorance is the other cause +of this calumny by which the House of Commons is +assailed. Ignorance produces a confusion of ideas +concerning the decorum of life, by confounding the +rules of private society with those of public function. +To talk, as we here talk, to persons in a mixed company +of men and women, would violate the law of +such societies; because they meet for the sole purpose +of social intercourse, and not for the exposure, +the censure, the punishment of crimes: to all which +things private societies are altogether incompetent. +In them crimes can never be regularly stated, proved, +or refuted. The law has therefore appointed special +places for such inquiries; and if in any of those places +we were to apply the emollient language of +drawing-rooms to the exposure of great crimes, it +would be as false and vicious in taste and in morals +as to use the criminatory language of this hall in +drawing and assembling rooms would be misplaced +and ridiculous. Every one knows that in common +society palliating names are given to vices. Adultery +in a lady is called gallantry; the gentleman is +commonly called a man of good fortune, sometimes +in French and sometimes in English. But is this +the tone which would become a person in a court of +justice, calling these people to an account for that<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_178" id="Page_178">{178}</a></span> +horrible crime which destroys the basis of society? +No, my Lords, this is not the tone of such proceedings. +Your Lordships know that it is not; the +Commons know that it is not; and because we have +acted on that knowledge, and stigmatized crimes with +becoming indignation, we are said to be actuated rather +by revenge than justice.</p> + +<p>If it should still be asked why we show sufficient +acrimony to excite a suspicion of being in any manner +influenced by malice or a desire of revenge, to +this, my Lords, I answer, Because we would be +thought to know our duty, and to have all the world +know how resolutely we are resolved to perform it. +The Commons of Great Britain are not disposed to +quarrel with the Divine Wisdom and Goodness, +which has moulded up revenge into the frame and +constitution of man. He that has made us what we +are has made us at once resentful and reasonable. +Instinct tells a man that he ought to revenge an injury; +reason tells him that he ought not to be a +judge in his own cause. From that moment revenge +passes from the private to the public hand; but in +being transferred it is far from being extinguished. +My Lords, it is transferred as a sacred trust to be +exercised for the injured, in measure and proportion, +by persons who, feeling as he feels, are in a temper +to reason better than he can reason. Revenge +is taken out of the hands of the original injured proprietor, +lest it should be carried beyond the bounds +of moderation and justice. But, my Lords, it is in +its transfer exposed to a danger of an opposite description. +The delegate of vengeance may not feel +the wrong sufficiently: he may be cold and languid +in the performance of his sacred duty. It is for<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_179" id="Page_179">{179}</a></span> +these reasons that good men are taught to tremble +even at the first emotions of anger and resentment +for their own particular wrongs; but they are likewise +taught, if they are well taught, to give the +loosest possible rein to their resentment and indignation, +whenever their parents, their friends, their +country, or their brethren of the common family of +mankind are injured. Those who have not such +feelings, under such circumstances, are base and degenerate. +These, my Lords, are the sentiments of +the Commons of Great Britain.</p> + +<p>Lord Bacon has very well said, that "revenge is a +kind of wild justice." It is so, and without this wild +austere stock there would be no justice in the world. +But when, by the skilful hand of morality and wise +jurisprudence, a foreign scion, but of the very same +species, is grafted upon it, its harsh quality becomes +changed, it submits to culture, and, laying aside its +savage nature, it bears fruits and flowers, sweet to +the world, and not ungrateful even to heaven itself, to +which it elevates its exalted head. The fruit of this +wild stock is revenge regulated, but not extinguished,—revenge +transferred from the suffering party to the +communion and sympathy of mankind. This is the +revenge by which we are actuated, and which we +should be sorry, if the false, idle, girlish, novel-like +morality of the world should extinguish in the breast +of us who have a great public duty to perform.</p> + +<p>This sympathetic revenge, which is condemned by +clamorous imbecility, is so far from being a vice, that +it is the greatest of all possible virtues,—a virtue +which the uncorrupted judgment of mankind has in +all ages exalted to the rank of heroism. To give up +all the repose and pleasures of life, to pass sleepless<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_180" id="Page_180">{180}</a></span> +nights and laborious days, and, what is ten times +more irksome to an ingenuous mind, to offer oneself +to calumny and all its herd of hissing tongues and +poisoned fangs, in order to free the world from fraudulent +prevaricators, from cruel oppressors, from robbers +and tyrants, has, I say, the test of heroic virtue, +and well deserves such a distinction. The Commons, +despairing to attain the heights of this virtue, never +lose sight of it for a moment. For seventeen years +they have, almost without intermission, pursued, by +every sort of inquiry, by legislative and by judicial +remedy, the cure of this Indian malady, worse ten +thousand times than the leprosy which our forefathers +brought from the East. Could they have done this, +if they had not been actuated by some strong, some +vehement, some perennial passion, which, burning +like the Vestal fire, chaste and eternal, never suffers +generous sympathy to grow cold in maintaining the +rights of the injured or in denouncing the crimes of +the oppressor?</p> + +<p>My Lords, the Managers for the Commons have +been actuated by this passion; my Lords, they feel +its influence at this moment; and so far from softening +either their measures or their tone, they do here, +in the presence of their Creator, of this House, and +of the world, make this solemn declaration, and nuncupate +this deliberate vow: that they will ever glow +with the most determined and unextinguishable animosity +against tyranny, oppression, and peculation in +all, but more particularly as practised by this man in +India; that they never will relent, but will pursue +and prosecute him and it, till they see corrupt pride +prostrate under the feet of justice. We call upon +your Lordships to join us; and we have no doubt that<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_181" id="Page_181">{181}</a></span> +you will feel the same sympathy that we feel, or (what +I cannot persuade my soul to think or my mouth to +utter) you will be identified with the criminal whose +crimes you excuse, and rolled with him in all the +pollution of Indian guilt, from generation to generation. +Let those who feel with me upon this occasion +join with me in this vow: if they will not, I have it +all to myself.</p> + +<p>It is not to defend ourselves that I have addressed +your Lordships at such length on this subject. No, +my Lords, I have said what I considered necessary to +instruct the public upon the principles which induced +the House of Commons to persevere in this business +with a generous warmth, and in the indignant language +which Nature prompts, when great crimes are +brought before men who feel as they ought to feel +upon such occasions.</p> + +<hr style='width: 45%;' /> + +<p>I now proceed, my Lords, to the next recriminatory +charge, which is <i>delay</i>. I confess I am not astonished +at this charge. From the first records of human impatience +down to the present time, it has been complained +that the march of violence and oppression is +rapid, but that the progress of remedial and vindictive +justice, even the divine, has almost always favored the +appearance of being languid and sluggish. Something +of this is owing to the very nature and constitution +of human affairs; because, as justice is a +circumspect, cautious, scrutinizing, balancing principle, +full of doubt even of itself, and fearful of doing +wrong even to the greatest wrong-doers, in the nature +of things its movements must be slow in comparison +with the headlong rapidity with which avarice, ambition, +and revenge pounce down upon the devoted prey<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_182" id="Page_182">{182}</a></span> +of those violent and destructive passions. And indeed, +my Lords, the disproportion between crime and justice, +when seen in the particular acts of either, would +be so much to the advantage of crimes and criminals, +that we should find it difficult to defend laws and tribunals, +(especially in great and arduous cases like +this,) if we did not look, not to the <i>immediate</i>, not to +the <i>retrospective</i>, but to the <i>provident</i> operation of justice. +Its chief operation is in its future example; and +this turns the balance, upon the total effect, in favor +of vindictive justice, and in some measure reconciles +a pious and humble mind to this great mysterious +dispensation of the world.</p> + +<p>Upon the charge of delay in this particular cause, +my Lords, I have only to say that the business before +you is of immense magnitude. The prisoner himself +says that all the acts of his life are committed in it. +With a due sense of this magnitude, we know that +the investigation could not be short to us, nor short +to your Lordships; but when we are called upon, as +we have been daily, to sympathize with the prisoner +in that delay, my Lords, we must tell you that we +have no sympathy with him. Rejecting, as we have +done, all false, spurious, and hypocritical virtues, we +should hold it to be the greatest of all crimes to +bestow upon the oppressors that pity which belongs +to the oppressed. The unhappy persons who are +wronged, robbed, and despoiled have no remedy but +in the sympathies of mankind; and when these sympathies +are suffered to be debauched, when they are +perversely carried from the victim to the oppressor, +then we commit a robbery still greater than that which +was committed by the criminal accused.</p> + +<p>My Lords, we do think this process long; we lament<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_183" id="Page_183">{183}</a></span> +it in every sense in which it ought to be lamented; +but we lament still more that the Begums have been +so long without having a just punishment inflicted +upon their spoiler. We lament that Cheyt Sing has +so long been a wanderer, while the man who drove +him from his dominions is still unpunished. We are +sorry that Nobkissin has been cheated of his money +for fourteen years, without obtaining redress. These +are our sympathies, my Lords; and thus we reply to +this part of the charge.</p> + +<p>My Lords, there are some matters of fact in this +charge of delay which I must beg your Lordships will +look into. On the 19th of February, 1789, the prisoner +presented a petition to your Lordships, in which +he states, after many other complaints, that a great +number of his witnesses were obliged to go to India, +by which he has lost the benefit of their testimony, +and that a great number of your Lordships' body +were dead, by which he has lost the benefit of their +judgment. As to the hand of God, though some +members of your House may have departed this life +since the commencement of this trial, yet the body +always remains entire. The evidence before you is +the same; and therefore there is no reason to presume +that your final judgment will be affected by these +afflicting dispensations of Providence. With regard +to his witnesses, I must beg to remind your Lordships +of one extraordinary fact. This prisoner has sent to +India, and obtained, not testimonies, but testimonials +to his general good behavior. He has never once +applied, by commission or otherwise, to falsify any +one fact that is charged upon, him,—no, my Lords, +not one. Therefore that part of his petition which +states the injury he has received from the Commons<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_184" id="Page_184">{184}</a></span> +of Great Britain is totally false and groundless. For +if he had any witnesses to examine, he would not +have failed to examine them; if he had asked for a +commission to receive their depositions, a commission +would have been granted; if, without a commission, +he had brought affidavits to facts, or regular recorded +testimony, the Commons of Great Britain would never +have rejected such evidence, even though they could +not have cross-examined it.</p> + +<p>Another complaint is, that many of his witnesses +were obliged to leave England before he could make +use of their evidence. My Lords, no delay in the trial +has prevented him from producing any evidence; +for we were willing that any of his witnesses should +be examined at any time most convenient to himself. +If many persons connected with his measures are +gone to India, during the course of his trial, many +others have returned to England. Mr. Larkins returned. +Was the prisoner willing to examine him? +No: and it was nothing but downright shame, and +the presumptions which he knew would be drawn +against him, if he did not call this witness, which +finally induced him to make use of his evidence. +We examined Mr. Larkins, my Lords; we examined +all the prisoner's witnesses; your Lordships have their +testimony; and down to this very hour he has not +put his hand upon any one whom he thought a proper +and essential witness to the facts, or to any part of +the cause, whose examination has been denied him; +nor has he even stated that any man, if brought here, +would prove such and such points. No, not one word +to this effect has ever been stated by the prisoner.</p> + +<p>There is, my Lords, another case, which was noticed +by my honorable fellow Manager yesterday. Mr.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_185" id="Page_185">{185}</a></span> +Belli, the confidential secretary of the prisoner, was +agent and contractor for stores; and this raised a +suspicion that the contracts were held by him for the +prisoner's advantage. Mr. Belli was here during the +whole time of the trial, and six weeks after we had +closed our evidence. We had then no longer the +arrangement of the order of witnesses, and he might +have called whom he pleased. With the full knowledge +of these circumstances, that witness did he suffer +to depart for India, if he did not even encourage +his departure. This, my Lords, is the kind of damage +which he has suffered by the want of witnesses, +through the protraction of this trial.</p> + +<p>But the great and serious evil which he complains +of, as being occasioned by our delay, is of so extraordinary +a nature that I must request your Lordships +to examine it with extraordinary strictness and attention. +In the petition before your Lordships, the prisoner +asserts that he was under the necessity, through +his counsel and solicitors, "of collecting and collating +from the voluminous records of the Company the +whole history of his public life, in order to form a +complete defence to every allegation which the Honorable +House of Commons had preferred against him, +and that he has expended upwards of thirty thousand +pounds in preparing the materials of his defence."</p> + +<p>It is evident, my Lords, that the expenditure of this +thirty thousand pounds is not properly connected with +the delay of which he complains; for he states that +he had incurred this loss merely in collecting and collating +materials, previous to his defence before your +Lordships. If this were true, and your Lordships +were to admit the amount as a rule and estimate by +which the aggregate of his loss could be ascertained,<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_186" id="Page_186">{186}</a></span> +the application of the rule of three to the sum and +time given would bring out an enormous expenditure +in the long period which has elapsed since the commencement +of the trial,—so enormous, that, if this +monstrous load of oppression has been laid upon him +by the delay of the Commons, I believe no man living +can stand up in our justification. But, my Lords, I +am to tell your Lordships some facts, into which we +trust <i>you</i>, will inquire: for this business is not in our +hands, nor can we lay it as a charge before you. +Your own Journals have recorded the document, in +which the prisoner complains bitterly of the House of +Commons, and indeed of the whole judicature of the +country,—a complaint which your Lordships will do +well to examine.</p> + +<p>When we first came to a knowledge of this petition, +which was not till some time after it was presented, +I happened to have conversation with a noble lord,—I +know not whether he be in his place in the +House or not, but I think I am not irregular in +mentioning his name. When I mention Lord Suffolk, +I name a peer whom honor, justice, veracity, and every +virtue that distinguishes the man and the peer +would claim for their own. My Lord Suffolk told +me, that, in a conversation with the late Lord Dover, +who brought the prisoner's petition into your House, +he could not refrain from expressing his astonishment +at that part of the petition which related to the expense +Mr. Hastings had been at; and particularly as +a complaint had been made in the House of the enormous +expense of the prosecution, which at that time +had only amounted to fourteen thousand pounds, +although the expense of the prosecutor is generally +greater than that of the defendant, and public pro<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_187" id="Page_187">{187}</a></span>ceedings +more expensive than private ones. Lord +Dover said, that, before he presented the petition, he +had felt exactly in the same manner; but that Mr. +Hastings assured him that six thousand pounds had +been paid to copying clerks in the India House, and +that from this circumstance he might judge of the +other expenses. Lord Dover was satisfied with this +assurance, and presented the petition, which otherwise +he should have declined to do, on account of the +apparent enormity of the allegation it contained. At +the time when Lord Suffolk informed me of these particulars, +(with a good deal of surprise and astonishment,) +I had not leisure to go down to the India +House in order to make inquiries concerning them, +but I afterwards asked the Secretary, Mr. Hudson, to +whom <i>we</i> had given a handsome reward, what sums +he had received from Mr. Hastings for his services +upon this occasion, and the answer was, "Not one +shilling." Not one shilling had Mr. Hudson received +from Mr. Hastings. The clerks of the Company +informed us that the Court of Directors had +ordered that every paper which Mr. Hastings wanted +should be copied for him gratuitously,—and that, if +any additional clerks were wanting for the effectual +execution of his wishes, the expense would be defrayed +by the Directors. Hearing this account, I +next inquired what <i>expedition money</i> might have been +given to the clerks: for we know something of this +kind is usually done. In reply to this question, Mr. +Hudson told me that at various times they had received +in little driblets to the amount of ninety-five +pounds, or thereabouts. In this way the account +stood when I made this inquiry, which was at least +half a year after the petition had been presented to<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_188" id="Page_188">{188}</a></span> +your Lordships. Thus the whole story of the six +thousand pounds was absolutely false. At that time +there was not one word of truth in it, whatever be +the amount of the sums which he has paid since. +Your Lordships will now judge whether you have +been abused by false allegations or not,—allegations +which could scarcely admit of being true, and which +upon the best inquiry I found absolutely false; and I +appeal to the testimony of the noble lord, who is now +living, for the truth of the account he received from +the worthy and respectable peer whose loss the nation +has to bewail.</p> + +<p>There are many other circumstances of fraud and +falsehood attending this petition, (we must call things +by their proper names, my Lords,)—there are, I say, +many circumstances of fraud and falsehood. We +know it to have been impossible, at the time of presenting +this petition, that this man should have expended +thirty thousand pounds in the preparation of +materials for his defence; and your Lordships' justice, +together with the credit of the House of Commons, +are concerned in the discovery of the truth. +There is, indeed, an ambiguous word in the petition. +He asserts that he is <i>engaged</i> for the payment of +that sum. We asked the clerks of the India House +whether he had given them any bond, note, security, +or promise of payment: they assured us that he had +not: they will be ready to make the same assurance +to your Lordships, when you come to inquire into +this matter, which before you give judgment we desire +and claim that you will do. All is concealment +and mystery on the side of the prisoner; all is open +and direct with us. We are desirous that everything +which is concealed may be brought to light.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_189" id="Page_189">{189}</a></span></p> + +<p>In contradiction, then, to this charge of oppression +and of an attempt to ruin his fortune, your Lordships +will see that at the time when he made this charge +he had not been, in fact, nor was for a long time +after, one shilling out of pocket. But some other +person had become security to his attorney for him. +What, then, are we to think of these men of business, +of these friends of Mr. Hastings, who, when he is possessed +of nothing, are contented to become responsible +for thirty thousand pounds, (was it thirty thousand +pounds out of the bullock contracts?)—responsible, +I say, for this sum, in order to maintain this +suit previous to its actual commencement, and who +consequently must be so engaged for every article of +expense that has followed from that time to this?</p> + +<p>Thus much we have thought it necessary to say +upon this part of the recriminatory charge of delay. +With respect to the delay in general, we are at present +under an account to our constituents upon that +subject. To them we shall give it. We shall not give +any further account of it to your Lordships. The +means belong to us as well as to you of removing +these charges. Your Lordships may inquire upon +oath, as we have done in our committee, into all the +circumstances of these allegations. I hope your +Lordships will do so, and will give the Commons an +opportunity of attending and assisting at this most +momentous and important inquiry.</p> + +<hr style='width: 45%;' /> + +<p>The next recriminatory charge made upon us by +the prisoner is, that, merely to throw an odium upon +him, we have brought forward a great deal of irrelevant +matter, which could not be proved regularly in +the course of examination at your bar, and particu<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_190" id="Page_190">{190}</a></span>larly +in the opening speech, which I had the honor +of making on the subject.</p> + +<p>Your Lordships know very well that we stated in +our charge that great abuses had prevailed in India, +that the Company had entered into covenants with +their servants respecting those abuses, that an act +of Parliament was made to prevent their recurrence, +and that Mr. Hastings still continued in their practice. +Now, my Lords, having stated this, nothing +could be more regular, more proper, and more pertinent, +than for us to justify both the covenants required +by the Company and the act made to prevent +the abuses which existed in India. We therefore +went through those abuses; we stated them, and +were ready to prove every material word and article +in them. Whether they were personally relevant +or irrelevant to the prisoner we cared nothing. We +were to make out from the records of the House +(which records I can produce, whenever I am called +upon for them) all these articles of abuse and grievance; +and we have stated these abuses as the +grounds of the Company's provisional covenants with +its servants, and of the act of Parliament. We have +stated them under two heads, violence and corruption: +for these crimes will be found, my Lords, in almost +every transaction with the native powers; and +the prisoner is directly or indirectly involved in every +part of them. If it be still objected, that these +crimes are irrelevant to the charge, we answer, that +we did not introduce them as matter of charge. We +say they were not irrelevant to the proof of the preamble +of our charge, which preamble is perfectly +relevant in all its parts. That the matters stated in +it are perfectly true we vouch the House of Com<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_191" id="Page_191">{191}</a></span>mons, +we vouch the very persons themselves who +were concerned in the transactions. When Arabic +authors are quoted, and Oriental tales told about +<i>flashes of lightning</i> and <i>three seals</i>, we quote the very +parties themselves giving this account of their own +conduct to a committee of the House of Commons.</p> + +<p>Your Lordships will remember that a most reverend +prelate, who cannot be named without every +mark of respect and attention, conveyed a petition to +your Lordships from a gentleman concerned in one +of those narratives. Upon your Lordships' table that +petition still lies. For the production of this narrative +we are not answerable to this House; your Lordships +could not make us answerable to him; but we +are answerable to our own House, we are answerable +to our own honor, we are answerable to all +the Commons of Great Britain for whatever we have +asserted in their name. Accordingly, General Burgoyne, +then a member of this Committee of Managers, +and myself, went down into the House of +Commons; we there restated the whole affair; we +desired that an inquiry should be made into it, at the +request of the parties concerned. But, my Lords, +they have never asked for inquiry from that day to +this. Whenever he or they who are criminated (not +by us, but in this volume of Reports that is in my +hand) desire it, the House will give them all possible +satisfaction upon the subject.</p> + +<p>A similar complaint was made to the House of +Commons by the prisoner, that matters irrelevant +to the charge were brought up hither. Was it not +open to him, and has he had no friends in the House +of Commons, to call upon the House, during the +whole period of this proceeding, to examine into the<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_192" id="Page_192">{192}</a></span> +particulars adduced in justification of the preamble +of the charge against him, in justification of the +covenants of the Company, in justification of the act +of Parliament? It was in his power to do it; it is +in his power still; and if it be brought before that +tribunal, to which I and my fellow Managers are +alone accountable, we will lay before that tribunal +such matters as will sufficiently justify our mode +of proceeding, and the resolution of the House of +Commons. I will not, therefore, enter into the particulars +(because they cannot be entered into by +your Lordships) any further than to say, that, if we +had ever been called upon to prove the allegations +which we have made, not in the nature of a charge, +but as bound in duty to this Court, and in justice to +ourselves, we should have been ready to enter into +proof. We offered to do so, and we now repeat the +offer.</p> + +<hr style='width: 45%;' /> + +<p>There was another complaint in the prisoner's petition, +which did not apply to the words of the preamble, +but to an allegation in the charge concerning +abuses in the revenue, and the ill consequences which +arose from them. I allude to those shocking transactions, +which nobody can mention without horror, in +Rampore and Dinagepore, during the government of +Mr. Hastings, and which we attempted to bring home +to him. What did he do in this case? Did he endeavor +to meet these charges fairly, as he might have +done? No, my Lords: what he said merely amounted +to this:—"Examination into these charges +would vindicate my reputation before the world; +but I, who am the guardian of my own honor and +my own interests, choose to avail myself of the rules<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_193" id="Page_193">{193}</a></span> +and orders of this House, and I will not suffer you to +enter upon that examination."</p> + +<p>My Lords, we admit, you are the interpreters of +your own rules and orders. We likewise admit that +our own honor may be affected by the character of +the evidence which we produce to you. But, my +Lords, they who withhold their defence, who suffer +themselves, as they say, to be cruelly criminated by +unjust accusation, and yet will not permit the evidence +of their guilt or innocence to be produced, are +themselves the causes of the irrelevancy of all these +matters. It cannot justly be charged on us; for we +have never offered any matter here which we did not +declare our readiness upon the spot to prove. Your +Lordships did not think fit to receive that proof. +We do not now censure your Lordships for your +determination: that is not the business of this day. +We refer to your determination for the purpose of +showing the falsehood of the imputation which the +prisoner has cast upon us, of having oppressed him +by delay and irrelevant matter. We refer to it in +order to show that the oppression rests with himself, +that it is all his own.</p> + +<p>Well, but Mr. Hastings complained also to the +House of Commons. Has he pursued the complaint? +No, he has not; and yet this prisoner, and these +gentlemen, his learned counsel, have dared to reiterate +their complaints of us at your Lordships' bar, +while we have always been, and still are, ready to +prove both the atrocious nature of the facts, and that +they are <i>referable</i> to the prisoner at your bar. To +this, as I have said before, the prisoner has objected; +this we are not permitted to do by your Lordships: +and therefore, without presuming to blame your de<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_194" id="Page_194">{194}</a></span>termination, +I repeat, that we throw the blame directly +upon himself, when he complains that his private +character suffers without the means of defence, since +he objects to the use of means of defence which are +at his disposal.</p> + +<p>Having gone through this part of the prisoner's +recriminatory charge, I shall close my observations on +his demeanor, and defer my remarks on his complaint +of our ingratitude until we come to consider his set-off +of services.</p> + +<hr style='width: 45%;' /> + +<p>The next subject for your Lordships' consideration +is the principle of the prisoner's defence. And here +we must observe, that, either by confession or conviction, +we are possessed of the facts, and perfectly +agreed upon the matter at issue between us. In taking +a view of the laws by which you are to judge, I +shall beg leave to state to you upon what principles +of law the House of Commons has criminated him, +and upon what principles of law, or pretended law, +he justifies himself: for these are the matters at issue +between us; the matters of fact, as I have just said, +being determined either by confession on his part or +by proof on ours.</p> + +<p>My Lords, we acknowledge that Mr. Hastings was +invested with discretionary power; but we assert that +he was bound to use that power according to the established +rules of political morality, humanity, and +equity. In all questions relating to foreign powers +he was bound to act under the Law of Nature and +under the Law of Nations, as it is recognized by the +wisest authorities in public jurisprudence; in his relation +to this country he was bound to act according +to the laws and statutes of Great Britain, either<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_195" id="Page_195">{195}</a></span> +in their letter or in their spirit; and we affirm, that +in his relation to the people of India he was bound +to act according to the largest and most liberal construction +of their laws, rights, usages, institutions, +and good customs; and we furthermore assert, that +he was under an express obligation to yield implicit +obedience to the Court of Directors. It is upon these +rules and principles the Commons contend that Mr. +Hastings ought to have regulated his government; +and not only Mr. Hastings, but all other governors. +It is upon these rules that he is responsible; and upon +these rules, and these rules only, your Lordships are +to judge.</p> + +<p>My Lords, long before the Committee had resolved +upon this impeachment, we had come, as I have told +your Lordships, to forty-five resolutions, every one +criminatory of this man, every one of them bottomed +upon the principles which I have stated. We never +will nor can we abandon them; and we therefore do +not supplicate your Lordships upon this head, but +claim and demand of right, that you will judge him +upon those principles, and upon no other. If once +they are evaded, you can have no rule for your judgment +but your caprices and partialities.</p> + +<p>Having thus stated the principles upon which the +Commons hold him and all governors responsible, and +upon which we have grounded our impeachment, and +which must be the grounds of your judgment, (and +your Lordships will not suffer any other ground to be +mentioned to you,) we will now tell you what are +the grounds of his defence.</p> + +<p>He first asserts, that he was possessed of an arbitrary +and despotic power, restrained by no laws but +his own will. He next says, that "the rights of the<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_196" id="Page_196">{196}</a></span> +people he governed in India are nothing, and that +the rights of the government are everything." The +people, he asserts, have no liberty, no laws, no inheritance, +no fixed property, no descendable estate, no +subordinations in society, no sense of honor or of +shame, and that they are only affected by punishment +so far as punishment is a corporal infliction, being totally +insensible of any difference between the punishment +of man and beast. These are the principles +of his Indian government, which Mr. Hastings has +avowed in their full extent. Whenever precedents +are required, he cites and follows the example of +avowed tyrants, of Aliverdy Khân, Cossim Ali Khân, +and Sujah Dowlah. With an avowal of these principles +he was pleased first to entertain the House of +Commons, the <i>active</i> assertors and conservators of the +rights, liberties, and laws of his country; and then to +insist upon them more largely and in a fuller detail +before this awful tribunal, the <i>passive</i> judicial conservator +of the same great interests. He has brought +out these blasphemous doctrines in this great temple +of justice, consecrated to law and equity for a long +series of ages. He has brought them forth in Westminster +Hall, in presence of all the Judges of the land, +who are to execute the law, and of the House of +Lords, who are bound as its guardians not to suffer +the words "arbitrary power" to be mentioned before +them. For I am not again to tell your Lordships, +that arbitrary power is treason in the law,—that to +mention it with law is to commit a contradiction in +terms. They cannot exist in concert; they cannot +hold together for a moment.</p> + +<p>Let us now hear what the prisoner says. "The +sovereignty which they [the subahdars, or viceroys<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_197" id="Page_197">{197}</a></span> +of the Mogul empire] assumed, it fell to my lot, very +unexpectedly, to exert; and whether or not such +power, or powers of that nature, were delegated to +me by any provisions of any act of Parliament I confess +myself too little of a lawyer to pronounce. I +only know that the acceptance of the sovereignty of +Benares, &c., is not acknowledged or admitted by any +act of Parliament; and yet, by the particular interference +of the majority of the Council, the Company +is clearly and indisputably seized of that sovereignty. +If, therefore, the <i>sovereignty</i> of Benares, as ceded to +us by the Vizier, have <i>any rights whatever</i> annexed to +it, and be not a mere empty word without meaning, +those rights must be such as are held, countenanced, +and established by the law, custom, and usage of the +Mogul empire, and not by the provisions of any British +act of Parliament hitherto enacted. <i>Those rights</i>, +and none other, I have been the involuntary instrument +of enforcing. And if any future act of Parliament +shall positively or by implication tend to annihilate +those very rights, or their exertion, as I have +exerted them, I much fear that the boasted sovereignty +of Benares, which was held up as an acquisition +almost obtruded on the Company against my consent +and opinion, (for I acknowledge that even then I +foresaw many difficulties and inconveniences in its +future exercise,)—I fear, I say, that this sovereignty +will be found a burden instead of a benefit, a heavy +clog rather than a precious gem to its present possessors: +I mean, unless the whole of our territory in that +quarter shall be rounded and made an uniform compact +body by one grand and systematic arrangement,—such +an arrangement as shall do away all the mischiefs, +doubts, and inconveniences (both to the gov<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_198" id="Page_198">{198}</a></span>ernors +and the governed) arising from the variety of +tenures, rights, and claims in all cases of landed property +and feudal jurisdiction in India, from the informality, +invalidity, and instability of all engagements +in so divided and unsettled a state of society, and +from the unavoidable anarchy and confusion of different +laws, religions, and prejudices, moral, civil, and +political, all jumbled together in one unnatural and +discordant mass. Every part of Hindostan has been +constantly exposed to these and similar disadvantages +ever since the Mahometan conquests. The Hindoos, +who never incorporated with their conquerors, were +kept in order only by the strong hand of power. The +constant necessity of similar exertions would increase +at once their energy and extent. So that rebellion +itself is the parent and promoter of <i>despotism</i>. Sovereignty +in India implies nothing else. For I know +not how we can form an estimate of its powers, but +from its visible effects; and those are everywhere the +same from Cabool to Assam. The whole history of +Asia is nothing more than precedents to prove the +invariable exercise of arbitrary power. To all this I +strongly alluded in the minutes I delivered in Council, +when the treaty with the new Vizier was on foot +in 1775; and I wished to make Cheyt Sing independent, +because in India dependence included a thousand +evils, many of which I enumerated at that time, and +they are entered in the ninth clause of the first section +of this charge. I knew the powers with which +an Indian sovereignty is armed, and the dangers to +which tributaries are exposed. I knew, that, from +the history of Asia, and from the very nature of mankind, +the subjects of a despotic empire are always +vigilant for the moment to rebel, and the sovereign is<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_199" id="Page_199">{199}</a></span> +ever jealous of rebellious intentions. A zemindar is +an Indian subject, and as such exposed to the common +lot of his fellows. <i>The mean and depraved state +of a mere zemindar</i> is therefore this very dependence +above mentioned on a despotic government, this very +proneness to shake off his allegiance, and this very +exposure to continual danger from his sovereign's +jealousy, which are consequent on the political state +of Hindostanic governments. Bulwant Sing, if he +had been, and Cheyt Sing, as long as he was, a zemindar, +stood exactly in this <i>mean and depraved state</i> +by the constitution of his country. I did not make it +for him, but would have secured him from it. Those +who made him a zemindar entailed upon him the +consequences of so mean and depraved a tenure. +Aliverdy Khân and Cossim Ali fined all their zemindars +on the necessities of war, and on every pretence +either of court necessity or court extravagance."</p> + +<p>I beseech your Lordships seriously to look upon +the whole nature of the principles upon which the +prisoner defends himself. He appeals to the custom +and usage of the Mogul empire; and the constitution +of that empire is, he says, arbitrary power. He +says, that he does not know whether any act of Parliament +bound him not to exercise this arbitrary +power, and that, if any such act should in future be +made, it would be mischievous and ruinous to our +empire in India. Thus he has at once repealed all +preceding acts, he has annulled by prospect every +future act you can make; and it is not in the power +of the Parliament of Great Britain, without ruining +the empire, to hinder his exercising this despotic +authority. All Asia is by him disfranchised at a +stroke. Its inhabitants have no rights, no laws, no<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_200" id="Page_200">{200}</a></span> +liberties; their state is mean and depraved; they may +be fined for any purpose of court extravagance or prodigality,—or +as Cheyt Sing was fined by him, not only +upon every war, but upon every pretence of war.</p> + +<p>This is the account he gives of his power, and of +the people subject to the British government in India. +We deny that the act of Parliament gave him any +such power; we deny that the India Company gave +him any such power, or that they had ever any such +power to give; we even deny that there exists in all +the human race a power to make the government of +any state dependent upon individual will. We disclaim, +we reject all such doctrines with disdain and +indignation; and we have brought them up to your +Lordships to be tried at your bar.</p> + +<p>What must be the condition of the people of India, +governed, as they have been, by persons who maintain +these principles as maxims of government, and not as +occasional deviations caused by the irregular will of +man,—principles by which the whole system of society +is to be controlled, not by law, reason, or justice, +but by the will of one man?</p> + +<p>Your Lordships will remark, that not only the +whole of the laws, rights, and usages, but the very +being of the people, are exposed to ruin: for Mr. +Hastings says, that the people may be fined, that +they may be exiled, that they may be imprisoned, +and that even their lives are dependent upon the +mere will of their foreign master; and that he, the +Company's Governor, exercised that will under the +authority of this country. Remark, my Lords, his +application of this doctrine. "I would," he says, +"have kept Cheyt Sing from the consequences of this +dependence, by making him independent, and not in<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_201" id="Page_201">{201}</a></span> +any manner subjecting him to our government. The +moment he came into a state of dependence upon the +British government, all these evils attached upon him.—It +is," he adds, "disagreeable to me to exert such +powers; but I know they must be exerted; and I +declare there is no security from this arbitrary power, +but by having nothing to do with the British government."</p> + +<p>My Lords, the House of Commons has already well +considered what may be our future moral and political +condition, when the persons who come from that +school of pride, insolence, corruption, and tyranny are +more intimately mixed up with us of purer morals. +Nothing but contamination can be the result, nothing +but corruption can exist in this country, unless we +expunge this doctrine out of the very hearts and +souls of the people. It is not to the gang of plunderers +and robbers of which I say this man is at the head, +that we are only, or indeed principally, to look. Every +man in Great Britain will be contaminated and +must be corrupted, if you let loose among us whole +legions of men, generation after generation, tainted +with these abominable vices, and avowing these detestable +principles. It is, therefore, to preserve the +integrity and honor of the Commons of Great Britain, +that we have brought this man to your Lordships' +bar.</p> + +<p>When these matters were first explained to your +Lordships, and strongly enforced by abilities greater +than I can exert, there was something like compunction +shown by the prisoner: but he took the most +strange mode to cover his guilt. Upon the cross-examination +of Major Scott, he discovered all the engines +of this Indian corruption. Mr. Hastings got<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_202" id="Page_202">{202}</a></span> +that witness to swear that this defence of his, from +which the passages I have read to your Lordships are +extracted, was not his, but that it was the work of +his whole Council, composed of Mr. Middleton, Mr. +Shore, Mr. Halhed, Mr. Baber,—the whole body of +his Indian Cabinet Council; that this was their work, +and not his; and that he disclaimed it, and therefore +that it would be wrong to press it upon him. +Good God! my Lords, what shall we say in this stage +of the business? The prisoner put in an elaborate +defence: he now disclaims that defence. He told us +that it was of his own writing, that he had been able +to compose it in five days; and he now gets five persons +to contradict his own assertions, and to disprove +on oath his most solemn declarations.</p> + +<p>My Lords, this business appears still more alarming, +when we find not only Mr. Hastings, but his +whole Council, engaged in it. I pray your Lordships +to observe, that Mr. Halhed, a person concerned with +Mr. Hastings in compiling a code of Gentoo laws, is +now found to be one of the persons to whom this +very defence is attributed which contains such detestable +and abominable doctrines. But are we to +consider the contents of this paper as the defence of +the prisoner or not? Will any one say, that, when +an answer is sworn to in Chancery, when an answer +is given here to an impeachment of the Commons, +or when a plea is made to an indictment, that it +is drawn by the defendant's counsel, and therefore is +not his? Did we not all hear him read this defence +in part at our bar?—did we not see him hand it +to his secretary to have it read by his son?—did he +not then hear it read from end to end?—did not +he himself desire it to be printed, (for it was no<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_203" id="Page_203">{203}</a></span> +act of ours,) and did he not superintend and revise +the press?—and has any breath but his own breathed +upon it? No, my Lords, the whole composition is +his, by writing or adoption; and never, till he found +it pressed him in this House, never, till your Lordships +began to entertain the same abhorrence of it +that we did, did he disclaim it.</p> + +<p>But mark another stage of the propagation of these +horrible principles. After having grounded upon +them the defence of his conduct against our charge, +and after he had got a person to forswear them for +him, and to prove him to have told falsehoods of the +grossest kind to the House of Commons, he again +adheres to this defence. The dog returned to his +vomit. After having vomited out his vile, bilious +stuff of arbitrary power, and afterwards denied it +to be his, he gets his counsel in this place to resort +to the loathsome mess again. They have thought +proper, my Lords, to enter into an extended series +of quotations from books of travellers, for the purpose +of showing that despotism was the only principle +of government acknowledged in India,—that the people +have no laws, no rights, no property movable or +immovable, no distinction of ranks, nor any sense of +disgrace. After citing a long line of travellers to +this effect, they quote Montesquieu as asserting the +same facts, declaring that the people of India had no +sense of honor, and were only sensible of the whip +as far as it produced corporal pain. They then proceed +to state that it was a government of misrule, productive +of no happiness to the people, and that it so +continued until subverted by the free government of +Britain,—namely, the government that Mr. Hastings +describes as having himself exercised there.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_204" id="Page_204">{204}</a></span></p> + +<p>My Lords, if the prisoner can succeed in persuading +us that these people have no laws, no rights, not +even the common sentiments and feeling of men, he +hopes your interest in them will be considerably lessened. +He would persuade you that their sufferings +are much assuaged by their being nothing new,—and +that, having no right to property, to liberty, to +honor, or to life, they must be more pleased with the +little that is left to them than grieved for the much +that has been ravished from them by his cruelty and +his avarice. This inference makes it very necessary +for me, before I proceed further, to make a few +remarks upon this part of the prisoner's conduct, +which your Lordships must have already felt with +astonishment, perhaps with indignation. This man, +who passed twenty-five years in India, who was fourteen +years at the head of his government, master of +all the offices, master of all the registers and records, +master of all the lawyers and priests of all this +empire, from the highest to the lowest, instead of +producing to you the fruits of so many years' local +and official knowledge upon that subject, has called +out a long line of the rabble of travellers to inform +you concerning the objects of his own government. +That his learned counsel should be ignorant of those +things is a matter of course. That, if left to himself, +the person who has produced all this stuff should, +in pursuit of his darling arbitrary power, wander +without a guide, or with false guides, is quite natural. +But your Lordships must have heard with astonishment, +that, upon points of law relative to the +tenure of lands, instead of producing any law document +or authority on the usages and local customs +of the country, he has referred to officers in the<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_205" id="Page_205">{205}</a></span> +army, colonels of artillery and engineers, to young +gentlemen just come from school, not above three +or four years in the country. Good God! would not +one rather have expected to hear him put all these +travellers to shame by the authority of a man who +had resided so long in the supreme situation of government,—to +set aside all these wild, loose, casual, +and silly observations of travellers and theorists? +On the contrary, as if he was ignorant of everything, +as if he knew nothing of India, as if he had +dropped from the clouds, he cites the observations of +every stranger who had been hurried in a palanquin +through the country, capable or incapable of observation, +to prove to you the nature of the government, +and of the power he had to exercise.</p> + +<p>My Lords, the Commons of Great Britain are not +disposed to resort to the ridiculous relations of travellers, +or to the wild systems which ingenious men +have thought proper to build on their authority. We +will take another mode. We will undertake to prove +the direct contrary of his assertions in every point +and particular. We undertake to do this, because +your Lordships know, and because the world knows, +that, if you go into a country where you suppose man +to be in a servile state,—where, the despot excepted, +there is no one person who can lift up his head above +another,—where all are a set of vile, miserable +slaves, prostrate and confounded in a common servitude, +having no descendible lands, no inheritance, +nothing that makes man feel proud of himself, or +that gives him honor and distinction with others,—this +abject degradation will take from you that kind +of sympathy which naturally attaches you to men feeling +like yourselves, to men who have hereditary dig<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_206" id="Page_206">{206}</a></span>nities +to support, and lands of inheritance to maintain, +as you peers have; you will, I say, no longer +have that feeling which you ought to have for the +sufferings of a people whom you suppose to be habituated +to their sufferings and familiar with degradation. +This makes it absolutely necessary for me +to refute every one of these misrepresentations; and +whilst I am endeavoring to establish the rights of +these people, in order to show in what manner and +degree they have been violated, I trust that your Lordships +will not think that the time is lost: certainly +I do not think that my labor will be misspent in endeavoring +to bring these matters fully before you.</p> + +<p>In determining to treat this subject at length, I +am also influenced by a strong sense of the evils +that have attended the propagation of these wild, +groundless, and pernicious opinions. A young man +goes to India before he knows much of his own country; +but he cherishes in his breast, as I hope every +man will, a just and laudable partiality for the laws, +liberties, rights, and institutions of his own nation. +We all do this; and God forbid we should not prefer +our own to every other country in the world! but if +we go to India with an idea of the mean, degraded +state of the people that we are to govern, and especially +if we go with these impressions at an immature +age, we know, that, according to the ordinary +course of human nature, we shall not treat persons +well whom we have learnt to despise. We know +that people whom we suppose to have neither laws or +rights will not be treated by us as a people who have +laws and rights. This error, therefore, for our sake, +for your sake, for the sake of the Indian public, and +for the sake of all those who shall hereafter go in<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_207" id="Page_207">{207}</a></span> +any station to India, I think it necessary to disprove +in every point.</p> + +<p>I mean to prove the direct contrary of everything +that has been said on this subject by the prisoner's +counsel, or by himself. I mean to prove that the +people of India have laws, rights, and immunities; +that they have property, movable and immovable, +descendible as well as occasional; that they have +property held for life, and that they have it as well +secured to them by the laws of their country as any +property is secured in this country; that they feel +for honor, not only as much as your Lordships can +feel, but with a <i>more</i> exquisite and poignant sense +than any people upon earth; and that, when punishments +are inflicted, it is not the lash they feel, but +the disgrace: in short, I mean to prove that every +word which Montesquieu has taken from idle and inconsiderate +travellers is absolutely false.</p> + +<p>The people of India are divided into three kinds: +the original natives of the country, commonly called +Gentoos; the descendants of the Persians and Arabians, +who are Mahometans; and the descendants of +the Moguls, who originally had a religion of their +own, but are now blended with the other inhabitants.</p> + +<p>The primeval law of that country is the Gentoo +law; and I refer your Lordships to Mr. Halhed's +translation of that singular code,—a work which I +have read with all the care that such an extraordinary +view of human affairs and human constitutions +deserves. I do not know whether Mr. Halhed's compilation +is in evidence before your Lordships, but +I do know that it is good authority on the Gentoo +law. Mr. Hastings, who instructed his counsel to +assert that the people have "no rights, no law,"<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_208" id="Page_208">{208}</a></span> +ought to be well acquainted with this work, because +he claimed for a while the glory of the compilation, +although Nobkissin, as your Lordships remember, was +obliged to pay the expense. This book, a compilation +of probably the most ancient laws in the world, +if we except the Mosaic, has in it the duty of the +magistrate and the duty of all ranks of subjects most +clearly and distinctly ascertained; and I will give up +the whole cause, if there is, from one end to the other +of this code, any sort of arbitrary power claimed +or asserted on the part of the magistrate, or any declaration +that the people have no rights of property. +No: it asserts the direct contrary.</p> + +<p>First, the people are divided into classes and ranks, +with more accuracy of distinction than is used in +this country, or in any other country under heaven. +Every class is divided into families, some of whom are +more distinguished and more honorable than others; +and they all have rights, privileges, and immunities belonging +to them. Even in cases of conquest, no confiscation +is to take place. A Brahmin's estate comes +by descent to him; it is forever descendible to his +heirs, if he has heirs; and if he has none, it belongs +to his disciples, and those connected with him in the +Brahminical caste. There are other immunities declared +to belong to this caste, in direct contradiction +to what has been asserted by the prisoner. In no +case shall a Brahmin suffer death; in no case shall +the property of a Brahmin, male or female, be confiscated +for crime, or escheat for want of heirs. The +law then goes on to other castes, and gives to each +its property, and distinguishes them with great accuracy +of discrimination.</p> + +<p>Mr. Hastings says that there is no inheritable prop<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_209" id="Page_209">{209}</a></span>erty +among them. Now you have only to look at +page 27, chapter the second, the title of which, is, +<i>Of the Division of Inheritable Property</i>. There, after +going through all the nicety of pedigree, it is declared, +that, "when a father, or grandfather, a great-grandfather, +or any relations of that nature, decease, or +lose their caste, or renounce the world, or are desirous +to give up their property, their sons, grandsons, +great-grandsons, and other natural heirs, may divide +and assume their glebe-lands, orchards, jewels, corals, +clothes, furniture, cattle, and birds, and all the +estate, real and personal." My Lords, this law recognizes +this kind of property; it regulates it with the +nicest accuracy of distinction; it settles the descent +of it in every part and circumstance. It nowhere +asserts (but the direct contrary is positively asserted) +that the magistrate has any power whatever over +property. It states that it is the magistrate's duty to +protect it; that he is bound to govern by law; that +he must have a council of Brahmins to assist him in +every material act that he does: in short, my Lords, +there is not even a trace of arbitrary power in the +whole system.</p> + +<p>My Lords, I will mention one article, to let you +see, in a very few words, that these Gentoos not only +have an inheritance, but that the law has established +a right of <i>acquiring</i> possession in the property of another +by prescription. The passage stands thus:—"If +there be a person who is not a minor," (a man +ceases to be a minor at fifteen years of age,) "nor +impotent, nor diseased, nor an idiot, nor so lame as +not to have power to walk, nor blind, nor one who, +on going before a magistrate, is found incapable of +distinguishing and attending to his own concerns,<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_210" id="Page_210">{210}</a></span> +and who has not given to another person power to +employ and to use his property,—if, in the face of +any such person, another man has applied to his own +use, during the space of twenty years, the glebe-land +or houses or orchards of that person, without let or +molestation from him, from the twenty-first year the +property becomes invested in the person so applying +such things to his own use; and any claim of the first +person above mentioned upon such glebe-[land or?] +houses or orchards shall by no means stand good: +but if the person before mentioned comes under any +of the circumstances herein before described, his +claim in that case shall stand good." Here you see, +my Lords, that possession shall by prescription stand +good against the claims of all persons who are not +disqualified from making their claims.</p> + +<p>I might, if necessary, show your Lordships that the +highest magistrate is subject to the law; that there +is a case in which he is finable; that they have established +rules of evidence and of pleading, and, in +short, all the rules which have been formed in other +countries to prevent this very arbitrary power. Notwithstanding +all this, the prisoner at the bar, and his +counsel, have dared to assert, in this sacred temple +of justice, in the presence of this great assembly, of +all the bishops, of all the peers, and of all the judges +of this land, that the people of India have no laws +whatever.</p> + +<p>I do not mean to trouble your Lordships with more +extracts from this book. I recommend it to your +Lordships' reading,—when you will find, that, so far +from the magistrate having any power either to imprison +arbitrarily or to fine arbitrarily, the rules of +fines are laid down with ten thousand times more<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_211" id="Page_211">{211}</a></span> +exactness than with us. If you here find that the +magistrate has any power to punish the people with +arbitrary punishment, to seize their property, or to +disfranchise them of any rights or privileges, I will +readily admit that Mr. Hastings has laid down good, +sound doctrine upon this subject. There is his own +book, a compilation of their laws, which has in it not +only good and excellent positive rules, but a system +of as enlightened jurisprudence, with regard to the +body and substance of it, as perhaps any nation ever +possessed,—a system which must have been composed +by men of highly cultivated understandings.</p> + +<p>As to the travellers that have been quoted, absurd +as they are in the ground of their argument, they are +not less absurd in their reasonings. For, having first +laid it down that there is no property, and that the +government is the proprietor of everything, they argue, +inferentially, that they have no laws. But if +ever there were a people that seem to be protected +with care and circumspection from all arbitrary power, +both in the executive and judicial department, +these are the people that seem to be so protected.</p> + +<p>I could show your Lordships that they are so sensible +of honor, that fines are levied and punishment +inflicted according to the rank of the culprit, and that +the very authority of the magistrate is dependent on +their rank. That the learned counsel should be ignorant +of these things is natural enough. They are +concerned in the gainful part of their profession. If +they know the laws of their own country, which I dare +say they do, it is not to be expected that they should +know the laws of any other. But, my Lords, it is to +be expected that the prisoner should know the Gentoo +laws: for he not only cheated Nobkissin of his money<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_212" id="Page_212">{212}</a></span> +to get these laws translated, but he took credit for +the publication of the work as an act of public spirit, +after shifting the payment from himself by fraud and +peculation. All this has been proved by the testimonies +of Mr. Auriol and Mr. Halhed before your Lordships.</p> + +<p>We do not bring forward this book as evidence of +guilt or innocence, but to show the laws and usages +of the country, and to prove the prisoner's knowledge +of them.</p> + +<p>From the Gentoo we will proceed to the Tartarian +government of India, a government established by +conquest, and therefore not likely to be distinguished +by any marks of extraordinary mildness towards the +conquered. The book before me will prove to your +Lordships that the head of this government (who is +falsely supposed to have a despotic authority) is absolutely +elected to his office. Tamerlane was elected; +and Genghis Khân particularly valued himself on improving +the laws and institutions of his own country. +These laws we only have imperfectly in this +book; but we are told in it, and I believe the fact, +that he forbade, under pain of death, any prince or +other person to presume to cause himself to be proclaimed +Great Khân or Emperor, without being first +duly elected by the princes lawfully assembled in +general diet. He then established the privileges and +immunities granted to the Tunkawns,—that is, to +the nobility and gentry of the country,—and afterwards +published most severe ordinances against governors +who failed in doing their duty, but principally +against those who commanded in far distant provinces. +This prince was in this case, what I hope your Lordships +will be, a very severe judge of the governors<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_213" id="Page_213">{213}</a></span> +of countries remote from the seat of the government.</p> + +<p>My Lords, we have in this book sufficient proof that +a Tartarian sovereign could not obtain the recognition +of ancient laws, or establish new ones, without +the consent of his parliament; that he could not ascend +the throne without being duly elected; and that, +when so elected, he was bound to preserve the great +in all their immunities, and the people in all their +rights, liberties, privileges, and properties. We find +these great princes restrained by laws, and even making +wise and salutary regulations for the countries +which they conquered. We find Genghis Khân establishing +one of his sons in a particular office,—namely, +conservator of those laws; and he has ordered +that they should not only be observed in his time, but +by all posterity; and accordingly they are venerated at +this time in Asia. If, then, this very Genghis Khân, +if Tamerlane, did not assume arbitrary power, what +are you to think of this man, so bloated with corruption, +so bloated with the insolence of unmerited power, +declaring that the people of India have no rights, +no property, no laws,—that he could not be bound +even by an English act of Parliament,—that he was +an arbitrary sovereign in India, and could exact +what penalties he pleased from the people, at the expense +of liberty, property, and even life itself? Compare +this man, this compound of pride and presumption, +with Genghis Khân, whose conquests were more +considerable than Alexander's, and yet who made the +laws the rule of his conduct; compare him with Tamerlane, +whose Institutes I have before me. I wish to +save your Lordships' time, or I could show you in the +life of this prince, that he, violent as his conquests<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_214" id="Page_214">{214}</a></span> +were, bloody as all conquests are, ferocious as a +Mahometan making his crusades for the propagation +of his religion, he yet knew how to govern his unjust +acquisitions with equity and moderation. If any +man could be entitled to claim arbitrary power, if +such a claim could be justified by extent of conquest, +by splendid personal qualities, by great learning and +eloquence, Tamerlane was the man who could have +made and justified the claim. This prince gave up +all his time not employed in conquests to the conversation +of learned men. He gave himself to all +studies that might accomplish a great man. Such a +man, I say, might, if any may, claim arbitrary power. +But the very things that made him great made him +sensible that he was but a man. Even in the midst +of all his conquests, his tone was a tone of humility; +he spoke of laws as every man must who knows what +laws are; and though he was proud, ferocious, and +violent in the achievement of his conquests, I will +venture to say no prince ever established institutes of +civil government more honorable to himself than the +Institutes of Timour. I shall be content to be brought +to shame before your Lordships, if the prisoner at your +bar can show me one passage where the assumption +of arbitrary power is even hinted at by this great conqueror. +He declares that the nobility of every country +shall be considered as his brethren, that the people +shall be acknowledged as his children, and that +the learned and the dervishes shall be particularly +protected. But, my Lords, what he particularly valued +himself upon I shall give your Lordships in his +own words:—"I delivered the oppressed from the +hand of the oppressor; and after proof of the oppression, +whether on the property or the person, the de<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_215" id="Page_215">{215}</a></span>cision +which I passed between them was agreeable to +the sacred law; and I did not cause any one person +to suffer for the guilt of another."<a name="FNanchor_95_95" id="FNanchor_95_95"></a><a href="#Footnote_95_95" class="fnanchor" title=" Institutes of Timour, p. 165.">[95]</a></p> + +<p>My Lords, I have only further to inform your +Lordships that these Institutes of Timour ought to be +very well known to Mr. Hastings. He ought to have +known that this prince never claimed arbitrary power; +that the principles he adopted were to govern by law, +to repress the oppressions of his inferior governors, to +recognize in the nobility the respect due to their rank, +and in the people the protection to which they were +by law entitled. This book was published by Major +Davy, and revised by Mr. White. The Major was +an excellent Orientalist; he was secretary to Mr. +Hastings, to whom, I believe, he dedicated this book. +I have inquired of persons the most conversant with +the Arabic and Oriental languages, and they are +clearly of opinion that there is internal evidence to +prove it of the age of Tamerlane; and he must be +the most miserable of critics, who, reading this work +with attention, does not see, that, if it was not written +by this very great monarch himself, it was at +least written by some person in his court and under +his immediate inspection. Whether, therefore, this +work be the composition of Tamerlane, or whether +it was written by some persons of learning near him, +through whom he meant to give the world a just +idea of his manners, maxims, and government, it is +certainly as good authority as Mr. Hastings's <i>Defence</i>, +which he has acknowledged to have been written by other +people.</p> + +<p>From the Tartarian I shall now proceed to the later +Mahometan conquerors of Hindostan: for it is fit<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_216" id="Page_216">{216}</a></span> +that I should show your Lordships the wickedness +of pretending that the people of India have no laws +or rights. A great proportion of the people are Mahometans; +and Mahometans are so far from having +no laws or rights, that, when you name a Mahometan, +you name a man governed by law and entitled to protection. +Mr. Hastings caused to be published, and I +am obliged to him for it, a book called "The Hedaya": +it is true that he has himself taken credit for +the work, and robbed Nobkissin of the money to pay +for it; but the value of a book is not lessened because +a man stole it. Will you believe, my Lords, that a +people having no laws, no rights, no property, no +honor, would be at the trouble of having so many +writers on jurisprudence? And yet there are, I am +sure, at least a thousand eminent Mahometan writers +upon law, who have written far more voluminous +works than are known in the Common Law of England, +and I verily believe more voluminous than +the writings of the Civilians themselves. That this +should be done by a people who have no property is +so perfectly ridiculous as scarcely to require refutation; +but I shall endeavor to refute it, and without +troubling you a great deal.</p> + +<p>First, then, I am to tell you that the Mahometans +are a people amongst whom the science of jurisprudence +is much studied and cultivated; that they distinguish +it into the law of the <i>Koran</i> and its authorized +commentaries,—into the <i>Fetwah</i>, which is the judicial +judgments and reports of adjudged cases,—into +the <i>Canon</i>, which is the regulations made by the emperor +for the sovereign authority in the government +of their dominions,—and, lastly, into the <i>Rawaj-ul-Mulk</i>, +or custom and usage, the common law of<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_217" id="Page_217">{217}</a></span> +the country, which prevails independent of any of +the former.</p> + +<p>In regard to punishments being arbitrary, I will, +with your Lordships' permission, read a passage +which will show you that the magistrate is a responsible +person. "If a supreme ruler, such as the +Caliph for the time being, commit any offence punishable +by law, such as whoredom, theft, or drunkenness, +he is not subject to any punishment; but yet +if he commit murder, he is subject to the law of +retaliation, and he is also accountable in matters of +property: because <i>punishment</i> is a right of God, the +infliction of which is committed to the Caliph, or +other supreme magistrate, and to none else; and he +cannot inflict punishment upon himself, as in this +there is no advantage, because the good proposed in +punishment is that it may operate as a warning to +deter mankind from sin, and this is not obtained by a +person's inflicting punishment upon himself, contrary +to the rights of the <i>individual</i>, such as the laws of +<i>retaliation</i> and of <i>property</i>, the penalties of which +may be exacted of the Caliph, as the claimant of +right may obtain satisfaction, either by the Caliph +impowering him to exact his right from himself, or +by the claimant appealing for assistance to the collective +body of Mussulmans."<a name="FNanchor_96_96" id="FNanchor_96_96"></a><a href="#Footnote_96_96" class="fnanchor" title=" Hedaya, Vol. II. p. 34.">[96]</a></p> + +<p>Here your Lordships see that the Caliph, who is a +magistrate of the highest authority which can exist +among the Mahometans, where property or life is +concerned has no arbitrary power, but is responsible +just as much as any other man.</p> + +<p>I am now to inform your Lordships that the sovereign +can raise no taxes. The imposing of a tribute<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_218" id="Page_218">{218}</a></span> +upon a Mussulman, without his previous consent, is +impracticable. And so far from all property belonging +to the sovereign, the public treasure does not belong +to him. It is declared to be the common property of +all Mahometans. This doctrine is laid down in many +places, but particularly in the 95th page of the second +volume of Hamilton's Hedaya.</p> + +<p>Mr. Hastings has told you what a sovereign is, and +what sovereignty is, all over India; and I wish your +Lordships to pay particular attention to this part of +his defence, and to compare Mr. Hastings's idea of +sovereignty with the declaration of the Mahometan +law. The tenth chapter of these laws treats of rebellion, +which is defined an act of warfare against the +sovereign. You are there told who the sovereign is, +and how many kinds of rebels there are. The author +then proceeds to say,—"The word <i>bâghee</i> (rebellion), +in its literal sense, means prevarication, also, +injustice and tyranny; in the language of the law +it is particularly applied to injustice, namely, withdrawing +from obedience to the rightful Imaum (as +appears in the <i>Fattahal-Kadeen</i>). By the rightful +Imaum is understood a person in whom all the qualities +essential to magistracy are united, such as Islamism, +freedom, sanity of intellect, and maturity of +age,—and who has been elected into his office by +any tribe of Mussulmans, with their general consent; +whose view and intention is the advancement of the +true religion and the strengthening of the Mussulmans, +and under whom the Mussulmans enjoy security +in person and property; one who levies tithe +and tribute according to law; who out of the public +treasury pays what is due to learned men, preachers, +kâzees, muftis, philosophers, public teachers, and<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_219" id="Page_219">{219}</a></span> +so forth; and who is just in all his dealings with +Mussulmans: for whoever does not answer this description +is not the right Imaum; whence it is not +incumbent to support such a one; but rather it is +incumbent to oppose him and make war upon him, +until such time as he either adopt a proper mode of +conduct or be slain."<a name="FNanchor_97_97" id="FNanchor_97_97"></a><a href="#Footnote_97_97" class="fnanchor" title=" Hedaya, Vol. II. pp. 247, 248.">[97]</a></p> + +<p>My Lords, is this a magistrate of the same description +as the sovereign delineated by Mr. Hastings? +This man must be elected by the general consent of +Mussulmans; he must be a protector of the person +and property of his subjects; a right of resistance is +directly established by law against him, and even the +duty of resistance is insisted upon. Am I, in praising +this Mahometan law, applauding the principle of elective +sovereignty? No, my Lords, I know the mischiefs +which have attended it; I know that it has shaken +the thrones of most of the sovereigns of the Mussulman +religion; but I produce the law as the clearest +proof that such a sovereign cannot be supposed to +have an arbitrary power over the property and persons +of those who elect him, and who have an acknowledged +right to resist and dethrone him, if he +does not afford them protection.</p> + +<p>I have now gone through what I undertook to +prove,—that Mr. Hastings, with all his Indian Council, +who have made up this volume of arbitrary power, +are not supported by the laws of the Moguls, by +the laws of the Gentoos, by the Mahometan laws, or +by any law, custom, or usage which has ever been +recognized as legal and valid.</p> + +<p>But, my Lords, the prisoner defends himself by +example; and, good God! what are the examples<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_220" id="Page_220">{220}</a></span> +which he has chosen? Not the local usages and constitutions +of Oude or of any other province; not the +general practice of a respectable emperor, like Akbar, +which, if it would not fatigue your Lordships, I could +show to be the very reverse of this man's. No, my +Lords, the prisoner, his learned counsel here, and his +unlearned Cabinet Council, who wrote this defence, +have ransacked the tales of travellers for examples, +and have selected materials from that mass of loose +remarks and crude conceptions, to prove that the +natives of India have neither rights, laws, orders, or +distinction.</p> + +<p>I shall now proceed to show your Lordships that +the people of India have a keen sense and feeling of +disgrace and dishonor. In proof of this I appeal to +well-known facts. There have been women tried in +India for offences, and acquitted, who would not survive +the disgrace even of acquittal. There have been +Hindoo soldiers, condemned at a court-martial, who +have desired to be blown from the mouth of a cannon, +and have claimed rank and precedence at the last +moment of their existence. And yet these people are +said to have no sense of dishonor! Good God! that +we should be under the necessity of proving, in this +place, all these things, and of disproving that all +India was given in slavery to this man!</p> + +<p>But, my Lords, they will show you, they say, that +Genghis Khân, Kouli Khân, and Tamerlane destroyed +ten thousand times more people in battle +than this man did. Good God! have they run mad? +Have they lost their senses in their guilt? Did they +ever expect that we meant to compare this man to +Tamerlane, Genghis Khân, or Kouli Khân?—to compare +a clerk at a bureau, to compare a fraudulent<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_221" id="Page_221">{221}</a></span> +bullock-contractor, (for we could show that his first +elementary malversations were in carrying on fraudulent +bullock-contracts; which contracts were taken +from him with shame and disgrace, and restored with +greater shame and disgrace,) to compare him with +the conquerors of the world? We never said he was +a tiger and a lion: no, we have said he was a weasel +and a rat. We have said that he has desolated countries +by the same means that plagues of his description +have produced similar desolations. We have +said that he, a fraudulent bullock-contractor, exalted +to great and unmerited powers, can do more mischief +than even all the tigers and lions in the world. We +know that a swarm of locusts, although individually +despicable, can render a country more desolate than +Genghis Khân or Tamerlane. When God Almighty +chose to humble the pride and presumption of Pharaoh, +and to bring him to shame, He did not effect +His purpose with tigers and lions; but He sent lice, +mice, frogs, and everything loathsome and contemptible, +to pollute and destroy the country. Think of +this, my Lords, and of your listening here to these +people's long account of Tamerlane's camp of two +hundred thousand persons, and of his building a pyramid +at Bagdad with the heads of ninety thousand of +his prisoners!</p> + +<p>We have not accused Mr. Hastings of being a great +general, and abusing his military powers: we know +that he was nothing, at the best, but a creature of +the bureau, raised by peculiar circumstances to the +possession of a power by which incredible mischief +might be done. We have not accused him of the +vices of conquerors: when we see him signalized by +any conquests, we may then make such an accusa<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_222" id="Page_222">{222}</a></span>tion; +at present we say that he has been trusted with +power much beyond his deserts, and that trust he has +grossly abused.—But to proceed.</p> + +<p>His counsel, according to their usual audacious +manner, (I suppose they imagine that they are counsel +for Tamerlane, or for Genghis Khân,) have thought +proper to accuse the Managers for the Commons of +wandering [wantoning?] in all the fabulous regions +of Indian mythology. My Lords, the Managers are +sensible of the dignity of their place; they have never +offered anything to you without reason. We are not +persons of an age, of a disposition, of a character, representative +or natural, to <i>wanton</i>, as these counsel call +it,—that is, to invent fables concerning Indian antiquity. +That they are not ashamed of making this +charge I do not wonder. But we are not to be thus +diverted from our course.</p> + +<p>I have already stated to your Lordships a material +circumstance of this case, which I hope will never +be lost sight of,—namely, the different situation in +which India stood under the government of its native +princes and its own original laws, and even under +the <i>dominion</i> of Mahometan conquerors, from that in +which it has stood under the government of a series +of tyrants, foreign and domestic, particularly of Mr. +Hastings, by whom it has latterly been oppressed and +desolated. One of the books which I have quoted was +written by Mr. Halhed; and I shall not be accused +of wantoning in fabulous antiquity, when I refer to +another living author, who wrote from what he saw +and what he well knew. This author says,—"In +truth, it would be almost cruelty to molest these +happy people" (speaking of the inhabitants of one of +the provinces near Calcutta); "for in this district are<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_223" id="Page_223">{223}</a></span> +the only vestiges of the beauty, purity, piety, regularity, +equity, and strictness of the ancient Hindostan +government: here the property as well as the liberty +of the people is inviolate." My Lords, I do not refer +you to this writer because I think it necessary to +our justification, nor from any fear that your Lordships +will not do us the justice to believe that we +have good authority for the facts which we state, and +do not (as persons with their licentious tongues dare +to say) wanton in fabulous antiquity. I quote the +works of this author, because his observations and +opinions could not be unknown to Mr. Hastings, +whose associate he was in some acts, and whose adviser +he appears to have been in that dreadful transaction, +the deposition of Cossim Ali Khân. This +writer was connected with the prisoner at your bar in +bribery, and has charged him with detaining his bribe. +To this Mr. Hastings has answered, that he had paid +him long ago. How they have settled that corrupt +transaction I know not. I merely state all this to +prove that we have not dealt in fabulous history, and +that, if anybody has dealt in falsehood, it is Mr. Hastings's +companion and associate in guilt, who must +have known the country, and who, however faulty he +was in other respects, had in this case no interest +whatever in misrepresentation.</p> + +<p>I might refer your Lordships, if it were necessary, +to Scrafton's account of that ancient government, in +order to prove to you the happy comparative state of +that country, even under its former usurpers. Our +design, my Lords, in making such references, is not +merely to disprove the prisoner's defence, but to vindicate +the rights and privileges of the people of India. +We wish to reinstate them in your sympathy. We<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_224" id="Page_224">{224}</a></span> +wish you to respect a people as respectable as yourselves,—a +people who know as well as you what is +rank, what is law, what is property,—a people who +know how to feel disgrace, who know what equity, +what reason, what proportion in punishments, what +security of property is, just as well as any of your +Lordships; for these are things which are secured to +them by laws, by religion, by declarations of all their +sovereigns. And what, my Lords, is opposed to all +this? The practice of tyrants and usurpers, which +Mr. Hastings takes for his rule and guidance. He +endeavors to find deviations from legal government, +and then instructs his counsel to say that I have asserted +there is no such thing as arbitrary power in +the East. Good God! if there was no such thing in +any other part of the world, Mr. Hastings's conduct +might have convinced me of the existence of arbitrary +power, and have taught me much of its mischief.</p> + +<p>But, my Lords, we all know that there has been arbitrary +power in India,—that tyrants have usurped +it,—and that, in some instances, princes otherwise +meritorious have violated the liberties of the people, +and have been lawfully deposed for such violation. +I do not deny that there are robberies on Hounslow +Heath,—that there are such things as forgeries, +burglaries, and murders; but I say that these acts +are against law, and that whoever commit them commit +illegal acts. When a man is to defend himself +against a charge of crime, it is not instances of similar +violation of law that is to be the standard of his +defence. A man may as well say, "I robbed upon +Hounslow Heath, but hundreds robbed there before +me": to which I answer, "The law has forbidden +you to rob there; and I will hang you for having vio<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_225" id="Page_225">{225}</a></span>lated +the law, notwithstanding the long list of similar +violations which you have produced as precedents." +No doubt princes have violated the law of this country: +they have suffered for it. Nobles have violated +the law: their privileges have not protected them +from punishment. Common people have violated the +law: they have been hanged for it. I know no human +being exempt from the law. The law is the +security of the people of England; it is the security +of the people of India; it is the security of every person +that is governed, and of every person that governs. +There is but one law for all, namely, that law which +governs all law, the law of our Creator, the law of +humanity, justice, equity,—the Law of Nature and +of Nations. So far as any laws fortify this primeval +law, and give it more precision, more energy, more +effect by their declarations, such laws enter into the +sanctuary, and participate in the sacredness of its +character. But the man who quotes as precedents +the abuses of tyrants and robbers pollutes the very +fountain of justice, destroys the foundations of all +law, and thereby removes the only safeguard against +evil men, whether governors or governed,—the +guard which prevents governors from becoming tyrants, +and the governed from becoming rebels.</p> + +<hr style='width: 45%;' /> + +<p>I hope your Lordships will not think that I have +unnecessarily occupied your time in disproving the +plea of arbitrary power, which has been brought forward +at our bar, has been repeated at your Lordships' +bar, and has been put upon the records of +both Houses. I hope your Lordships will not think +that such monstrous doctrine should be passed over, +without all possible pains being taken to demonstrate<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_226" id="Page_226">{226}</a></span> +its falsehood and to reprobate its tendency. I have +not spared myself in exposing the principles avowed +by the prisoner. At another time I will endeavor +to show you the manner in which he acted upon +these principles. I cannot command strength to +proceed further at present; and you, my Lords, cannot +give me greater bodily strength than I have.</p> + +<div class="footnotes"><h3>FOOTNOTES:</h3> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_95_95" id="Footnote_95_95"></a><a href="#FNanchor_95_95"><span class="label">[95]</span></a> Institutes of Timour, p. 165.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_96_96" id="Footnote_96_96"></a><a href="#FNanchor_96_96"><span class="label">[96]</span></a> Hedaya, Vol. II. p. 34.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_97_97" id="Footnote_97_97"></a><a href="#FNanchor_97_97"><span class="label">[97]</span></a> Hedaya, Vol. II. pp. 247, 248.</p></div> +</div> + +<p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_227" id="Page_227">{227}</a></span></p> +<hr style="width: 65%;" /> +<h2><a name="SECOND_DAY_FRIDAY_MAY_30_1794" id="SECOND_DAY_FRIDAY_MAY_30_1794"></a>SPEECH<br /> +<br /> +<span style="font-size: 50%;">IN</span><br /> +<br /> +GENERAL REPLY.<br /> +<br /> +<span style="font-size: 50%;">SECOND DAY: FRIDAY, MAY 30, 1794.</span></h2> + + +<p>My lords,—On the last day of the sitting of +this court, when I had the honor of appearing +before you by the order of my fellow Managers, I +stated to you their observations and my own upon +two great points: one the demeanor of the prisoner +at the bar during his trial, and the other the principles +of his defence. I compared that demeanor +with the behavior of some of the greatest men in +this kingdom, who have, on account of their offences, +been brought to your bar, and who have seldom +escaped your Lordships' justice. I put the +decency, humility, and propriety of the most distinguished +men's behavior in contrast with the shameless +effrontery of this prisoner, who has presumptuously +made a recriminatory charge against the House +of Commons, and answered their impeachment by +a counter impeachment, explicitly accusing them of +malice, oppression, and the blackest ingratitude.</p> + +<p>My Lords, I next stated that this recriminatory +charge consisted of two distinct parts,—injustice and +delay. To the injustice we are to answer by the nature +and proof of the charges which we have brought +before you; and to the delay, my Lords, we have +answered in another place. Into one of the conse<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_228" id="Page_228">{228}</a></span>quences +of the delay, the ruinous expense which the +prisoner complains of, we have desired your Lordships +to make an inquiry, and have referred you to facts and +witnesses which will remove this part of the charge.</p> + +<p>With regard to ingratitude, there will be a proper +time for animadversion on this charge. For in considering +the merits that are intended to be set off +against his crimes, we shall have to examine into the +nature of those merits, and to ascertain how far they +are to operate, either as the prisoner designs they +shall operate in his favor, as presumptive proofs that +a man of such merits could not be guilty of such +crimes, or as a sort of set-off to be pleaded in mitigation +of his offences. In both of these lights we shall +consider his services, and in this consideration we +shall determine the justice of his charge of ingratitude.</p> + +<p>My Lords, we have brought the demeanor of the +prisoner before you for another reason. We are desirous +that your Lordships may be enabled to estimate, +from the proud presumption and audacity of +the criminal at your bar, when he stands before +the most awful tribunal in the world, accused by +a body representing no less than the sacred voice of +his country, what he must have been when placed in +the seat of pride and power. What must have been +the insolence of that man towards the natives of India, +who, when called here to answer for enormous +crimes, presumes to behave, not with the firmness +of innocence, but with the audacity and hardness of +guilt!</p> + +<p>It may be necessary that I should recall to your +Lordships' recollection the principles of the accusation +and of the defence. Your Lordships will bear<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_229" id="Page_229">{229}</a></span> +in mind that the matters of fact are all either settled +by confession or conviction, and that the question +now before you is no longer an issue of fact, but an +issue of law. The question is, what degree of merit +or demerit you are to assign by law to actions which +have been laid before you, and their truth acknowledged.</p> + +<p>The principle being established that you are to decide +upon an issue at law, we examined by what law +the prisoner ought to be tried; and we preferred a +claim which we do now solemnly prefer, and which +we trust your Lordships will concur with us in a +laudable emulation to establish,—a claim founded +upon the great truths, that all power is limited by +law, and ought to be guided by discretion, and not by +arbitrary will,—that all discretion must be referred +to the conservation and benefit of those over whom +power is exercised, and therefore must be guided by +rules of sound political morality.</p> + +<p>We next contended, that, wherever existing laws +were applicable, the prisoner at your bar was bound +by the laws and statutes of this kingdom, as a British +subject; and that, whenever he exercised authority +in the name of the Company, or in the name of his +Majesty, or under any other name, he was bound by +the laws and statutes of this kingdom, both in letter +and spirit, so far as they were applicable to him and +to his case; and above all, that he was bound by +the act to which he owed his appointment, in all +transactions with foreign powers, to act according to +the known recognized rules of the Law of Nations, +whether these powers were really or nominally sovereign, +whether they were dependent or independent.</p> + +<p>The next point which we established, and which<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_230" id="Page_230">{230}</a></span> +we now call to your Lordships' recollection, is, that +he was bound to proceed according to the laws, +rights, laudable customs, privileges, and franchises +of the country that he governed; and we contended +that to such laws, rights, privileges, and franchises +the people of the country had a clear and just +claim.</p> + +<p>Having established these points as the basis of Mr. +Hastings's general power, we contended that he was +obliged by the nature of his relation, as a servant to +the Company, to be obedient to their orders at all +times, and particularly where he had entered into special +covenants regarding special articles of obedience.</p> + +<p>These are the principles by which we have examined +the conduct of this man, and upon which we +have brought him to your Lordships' bar for judgment. +This is our table of the law. Your Lordships +shall now be shown the table by which he claims to +be judged. But I will first beg your Lordships to +take notice of the utter contempt with which he treats +all our acts of Parliament.</p> + +<p>Speaking of the absolute sovereignty which he +would have you believe is exercised by the princes +of India, he says, "The sovereignty which they assumed +it fell to my lot, very unexpectedly, to exert; +and whether or not such power, or powers of that nature, +were delegated to me by any provisions of any +act of Parliament I confess myself too little of a lawyer +to pronounce," and so on. This is the manner +in which he treats an act of Parliament! In the +place of acts of Parliament he substitutes his own +arbitrary will. This he contends is the sole law of +the country he governed, as laid down in what he +calls the arbitrary Institutes of Genghis Khân and<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_231" id="Page_231">{231}</a></span> +Tamerlane. This arbitrary will he claims, to the +exclusion of the Gentoo law, the Mahometan law, +and the law of his own country. He claims the +right of making his own will the sole rule of his +government, and justifies the exercise of this power +by the examples of Aliverdy Khân, Cossim Ali Khân, +Sujah Dowlah Khân, and all those Khâns who have +rebelled against their masters, and desolated the +countries subjected to their rule. This, my Lords, +is the law which he has laid down for himself, and +these are the examples which he has expressly told +the House of Commons he is resolved to follow. +These examples, my Lords, and the principles with +which they are connected, without any softening or +mitigation, he has prescribed to you as the rule by +which his conduct is to be judged.</p> + +<p>Another principle of the prisoner is, that, whenever +the Company's affairs are in distress, even when +that distress proceeds from his own prodigality, mismanagement, +or corruption, he has a right to take +for the Company's benefit privately in his own name, +with the future application of it to their use reserved +in his own breast, every kind of bribe or corrupt +present whatever.</p> + +<p>I have now restated to your Lordships the maxims +by which the prisoner persists in defending himself, +and the principles upon which we claim to have him +judged. The issue before your Lordships is a hundred +times more important than the cause itself, for +it is to determine by what law or maxims of law the +conduct of governors is to be judged.</p> + +<p>On one side, your Lordships have the prisoner +declaring that the people have no laws, no rights, no +usages, no distinctions of rank, no sense of honor, no<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_232" id="Page_232">{232}</a></span> +property,—in short, that they are nothing but a herd +of slaves, to be governed by the arbitrary will of a +master. On the other side, we assert that the direct +contrary of this is true. And to prove our assertion +we have referred you to the Institutes of Genghis +Khân and of Tamerlane; we have referred you to the +Mahometan law, which is binding upon all, from the +crowned head to the meanest subject,—a law interwoven +with a system of the wisest, the most learned, +and most enlightened jurisprudence that perhaps ever +existed in the world. We have shown you, that, if +these parties are to be compared together, it is not +the rights of the people which are nothing, but rather +the rights of the sovereign which are so. The rights +of the people are everything, as they ought to be, in +the true and natural order of things. God forbid +that these maxims should trench upon sovereignty, +and its true, just, and lawful prerogative!—on the +contrary, they ought to support and establish them. +The sovereign's rights are undoubtedly sacred rights, +and ought to be so held in every country in the world, +because exercised for the benefit of the people, and +in subordination to that great end for which alone +God has vested power in any man or any set of men. +This is the law that we insist upon, and these are the +principles upon which your Lordships are to try the +prisoner at your bar.</p> + +<p>Let me remind your Lordships that these people +lived under the laws to which I have referred you, +and that these laws were formed whilst we, I may +say, were in the forest, certainly before we knew what +technical jurisprudence was. These laws are allowed +to be the basis and substratum of the manners, customs, +and opinions of the people of India; and we<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_233" id="Page_233">{233}</a></span> +contend that Mr. Hastings is bound to know them +and to act by them; and I shall prove that the very +condition upon which he received power in India was +to protect the people in their laws and known rights. +But whether Mr. Hastings did know these laws, or +whether, content with credit gained by as base a +fraud as was ever practised, he did not read the books +which Nobkissin paid for, we take the benefit of +them: we know and speak after knowledge of them. +And although I believe his Council have never read +them, I should be sorry to stand in this place, if there +was one word and tittle in these books that I had not +read over.</p> + +<p>We therefore come here and declare to you that he +is not borne out by these Institutes, either in their +general spirit or in any particular passage to which +he has had the impudence to appeal, in the assumption +of the arbitrary power which he has exercised. +We claim, that, as our own government and every +person exercising authority in Great Britain is bound +by the laws of Great Britain, so every person exercising +authority in another country shall be subject to +the laws of that country; since otherwise they break +the very covenant by which we hold our power there. +Even if these Institutes had been arbitrary, which +they are not, they might have been excused as the +acts of conquerors. But, my Lords, he is no conqueror, +nor anything but what you see him,—a bad +scribbler of absurd papers, in which he can put no +two sentences together without contradiction. We +know him in no other character than that of having +been a bullock-contractor for some years, of having +acted fraudulently in that capacity, and afterwards +giving fraudulent contracts to others; and yet I will<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_234" id="Page_234">{234}</a></span> +maintain that the first conquerors of the world would +have been base and abandoned, if they had assumed +such a right as he dares to claim. It is the glory of +all such great men to have for their motto, <i>Parcere +subjectis et debellare superbos</i>. These were men that +said they would recompense the countries which they +had obtained through torrents of blood, through carnage +and violence, by the justice of their institutions, +the mildness of their laws, and the equity of their +government. Even if these conquerors had promulgated +arbitrary institutes instead of disclaiming them +in every point, you, my Lords, would never suffer +such principles of defence to be urged here; still less +will you suffer the examples of men acting by violence, +of men acting by wrong, the example of a man +who has become a rebel to his sovereign in order that +he should become the tyrant of his people, to be examples +for a British governor, or for any governor. +We here confidently protest against this mode of justification, +and we maintain that his pretending to follow +these examples is in itself a crime. The prisoner +has ransacked all Asia for principles of despotism; +he has ransacked all the bad and corrupted part of it +for tyrannical examples to justify himself: and certainly +in no other way can he be justified.</p> + +<p>Having established the falsehood of the first principle +of the prisoner's defence, that sovereignty, wherever +it exists in India, implies in its nature and +essence a power of exacting anything from the subject, +and disposing of his person and property, we +now come to his second assertion, that he was the +true, full, and perfect representative of that sovereignty +in India.</p> + +<p>In opposition to this assertion we first do positively<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_235" id="Page_235">{235}</a></span> +deny that he or the Company are the perfect representative +of any sovereign power whatever. They +have certain rights by their charter, and by acts of +Parliament, but they have no other. They have their +legal rights only, and these do not imply any such +thing as sovereign power. The sovereignty of Great +Britain is in the King; he is the sovereign of the +Lords and the sovereign of the Commons, individually +and collectively; and as he has his prerogative +established by law, he must exercise it, and all persons +claiming and deriving under him, whether by +act of Parliament, whether by charter of the Crown, +or by any other mode whatever, all are alike bound +by law, and responsible to it. No one can assume or +receive any power of sovereignty, because the sovereignty +is in the Crown, and cannot be delegated +away from the Crown; no such delegation ever took +place, or ever was intended, as any one may see in +the act by which Mr. Hastings was nominated Governor. +He cannot, therefore, exercise that high supreme +sovereignty which is vested by the law, with +the consent of both Houses of Parliament, in the +King, and in the King only. It is a violent, rebellious +assumption of power, when Mr. Hastings pretends +fully, perfectly, and entirely to represent the +sovereign of this country, and to exercise legislative, +executive, and judicial authority, with as large and +broad a sway as his Majesty, acting with the consent +of the two Houses of Parliament, and agreeably to +the laws of this kingdom. I say, my Lords, this is a +traitorous and rebellious assumption, which he has +no right to make, and which we charge against him, +and therefore it cannot be urged in justification of his +conduct in any respect.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_236" id="Page_236">{236}</a></span></p> + +<p>He next alleges, with reference to one particular +case, that he received this sovereignty from the Vizier +Sujah Dowlah, who he pretends was sovereign, with +an unlimited power over the life, goods, and property +of Cheyt Sing. This we positively deny. Whatever +power the supreme sovereign of the empire had, we +deny that it was delegated to Sujah Dowlah. He +never was in possession of it. He was a vizier of the +empire; he had a grant of certain lands for the support +of that dignity: and we refer you to the Institutes +of Timour, to the Institutes of Akbar, to the +institutes of the Mahometan law, for the powers of +delegated governors and viceroys. You will find that +there is not a trace of sovereignty in them, but that +they are, to all intents and purposes, mere subjects; +and consequently, as Sujah Dowlah had not these +powers, he could not transfer them to the India Company. +His master, the Mogul emperor, had them +not. I defy any man to show an instance of that emperor's +claiming any such thing as arbitrary power; +much less can it be claimed by a rebellious viceroy +who had broken loose from his sovereign's authority, +just as this man broke loose from the authority of +Parliament. The one had not a right to give, nor +the other to receive such powers. But whatever rights +were vested in the Mogul, they cannot belong either +to Sujah Dowlah, to Mr. Hastings, or to the Company. +These latter are expressly bound by their compact +to take care of the subjects of the empire, and to +govern them according to law, reason, and equity; +and when they do otherwise, they are guilty of tyranny, +of a violation of the rights of the people, and of +rebellion against their sovereign.</p> + +<p>We have taken these pains to ascertain and fix<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_237" id="Page_237">{237}</a></span> +principles, because your Lordships are not called upon +to judge of facts. A jury may find facts, but no jury +can form a judgment of law; it is an application of +the law to the fact that makes the act criminal or +laudable. You must find a fixed standard of some +kind or other; for if there is no standard but the immediate +momentary purpose of the day, guided and +governed by the man who uses it, fixed not only for +the disposition of all the wealth and strength of the +state, but for the life, fortune, and property of every +individual, your Lordships are left without a principle +to direct your judgment. This high court, this supreme +court of appeal from all the courts of the kingdom, +this highest court of criminal jurisdiction, exercised +upon the requisition of the House of Commons, +if left without a rule, would be as lawless as the +wild savage, and as unprincipled as the prisoner that +stands at your bar. Our whole issue is upon principles, +and what I shall say to you will be in perpetual +reference to them; because it is better to have no +principles at all than to have false principles of government +and of morality. Leave a man to his passions, +and you leave a wild beast to a savage and +capricious nature. A wild beast, indeed, when its +stomach is full, will caress you, and may lick your +hands; in like manner, when a tyrant is pleased or +his passion satiated, you may have a happy and serene +day under an arbitrary government. But when the +principle founded on solid reason, which ought to restrain +passion, is perverted from its proper end, the +false principle will be substituted for it, and then +man becomes ten times worse than a wild beast. The +evil principle, grown solid and perennial, goads him +on and takes entire possession of his mind; and then<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_238" id="Page_238">{238}</a></span> +perhaps the best refuge that you can have from that +diabolical principle is in the natural wild passions and +unbridled appetites of mankind. This is a dreadful +state of things; and therefore we have thought it necessary +to say a great deal upon his principles.</p> + +<hr style='width: 45%;' /> + +<p>My Lords, we come next to apply these principles +to facts which cannot otherwise be judged, as we have +contended and do now contend. I will not go over +facts which have been opened to you by my fellow +Managers: if I did so, I should appear to have a distrust, +which I am sure no other man has, of the +greatest abilities displayed in the greatest of all causes. +I should be guilty of a presumption which I hope I +shall not dream of, but leave to those who exercise +arbitrary power, in supposing that I could go over the +ground which my fellow Managers have once trodden, +and make anything more clear and forcible than they +have done. In my humble opinion, human ability +cannot go farther than they have gone; and if I ever +allude to anything which they have already touched, +it will be to show it in another light,—to mark more +particularly its departure from the principles upon +which we contend you ought to judge, or to supply +those parts which through bodily infirmity, and I am +sure nothing else, one of my excellent fellow Managers +has left untouched. I am here alluding to the +case of Cheyt Sing.</p> + +<p>My honorable fellow Manager, Mr. Grey, has stated +to you all the circumstances requisite to prove two +things: first, that the demands made by Mr. Hastings +upon Cheyt Sing were contrary to fundamental treaties +between the Company and that Rajah; and next, +that they were the result and effect of private malice<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_239" id="Page_239">{239}</a></span> +and corruption. This having been stated and proved +to you, I shall take up the subject where it was left.</p> + +<p>My Lords, in the first place, I have to remark to +you, that the whole of the charge originally brought +by Mr. Hastings against Cheyt Sing, in justification +of his wicked and tyrannical proceedings, is, that he +had been dilatory, evasive, shuffling, and unwilling to +pay that which, however unwilling, evasive, and shuffling, +he did pay; and that, with regard to the business +of furnishing cavalry, the Rajah has asserted, and his +assertion has not been denied, that, when he was desired +by the Council to furnish these troopers, the +purpose for which this application was made was not +mentioned or alluded to, nor was there any place of +muster pointed out. We therefore contended, that +the demand was not made for the service of the state, +but for the oppression of the individual that suffered +by it.</p> + +<p>But admitting the Rajah to have been guilty of +delay and unwillingness, what is the nature of the +offence? If you strip it of the epithets by which it +has been disguised, it merely amounts to an unwillingness +in the Rajah to pay more than the sums stipulated +by the mutual agreement existing between him and +the Company. This is the whole of it, the whole front +and head of the offence; and for this offence, such as +it is, and admitting that he could be legally fined for +it, he was subjected to the secret punishment of giving +a bribe to Mr. Hastings, by which he was to buy off +the fine, and which was consequently a commutation +for it.</p> + +<p>That your Lordships may be enabled to judge more +fully of the nature of this offence, let us see in what +relation Cheyt Sing stood with the Company. He<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_240" id="Page_240">{240}</a></span> +was, my Lords, a person clothed with every one of the +attributes of sovereignty, under a direct stipulation +that the Company should not interfere in his internal +government. The military and civil authority, the +power of life and death, the whole revenue, and the +whole administration of the law, rested in him. Such +was the sovereignty he possessed within Benares: +but he was a subordinate sovereign dependent upon +a superior, according to the tenor of his compact, +expressed or implied. Now, having contended, as we +still contend, that the Law of Nations is the law of +India as well as of Europe, because it is the law of +reason and the law of Nature, drawn from the pure +sources of morality, of public good, and of natural +equity, and recognized and digested into order by the +labor of learned men, I will refer your Lordships to +Vattel, Book I. Cap. 16, where he treats of the breach +of such agreements, by the protector refusing to give +protection, or the protected refusing to perform his +part of the engagement. My design in referring you +to this author is to prove that Cheyt Sing, so far from +being blamable in raising objections to the unauthorized +demand made upon him by Mr. Hastings, was +absolutely bound to do so; nor could he have done +otherwise, without hazarding the whole benefit of the +agreement upon which his subjection and protection +were founded. The law is the same with respect to +both contracting parties: if the protected or protector +does not fulfil with fidelity <i>each his separate stipulation</i>, +the protected may resist the unauthorized demand of +the protector, or the protector is discharged from his +engagement; he may refuse protection, and declare +the treaty broken.</p> + +<p>We contend in favor of Cheyt Sing, in support of<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_241" id="Page_241">{241}</a></span> +the principles of natural equity, and of the Law of +Nations, which is the birthright of us all,—we contend, +I say, that Cheyt Sing would have established, +in the opinions of the best writers on the Law of Nations, +a precedent against himself for any future violation +of the engagement, if he submitted to any new +demand, without what our laws call a continual claim +or perpetual remonstrance against the imposition. +Instead, therefore, of doing that which was criminal, +he did that which his safety and his duty bound him +to do; and for doing this he was considered by Mr. +Hastings as being guilty of a great crime. In a paper +which was published by the prisoner in justification +of this act, he considers the Rajah to have been guilty +of rebellious intentions; and he represents these acts +of contumacy, as he calls them, not as proofs of contumacy +merely, but as proofs of a settled design to rebel, +and to throw off the authority of that nation by which +he was protected. This belief he declares on oath to +be the ground of his conduct towards Cheyt Sing.</p> + +<p>Now, my Lords, we do contend, that, if any subject, +under any name, or of any description, be not +engaged in public, open rebellion, but continues to +acknowledge the authority of his sovereign, and, if +tributary, to pay tribute conformably to agreement, +such a subject, in case of being suspected of having +formed traitorous designs, ought to be treated in a +manner totally different from that which was adopted +by Mr. Hastings. If the Rajah of Benares had formed +a secret conspiracy, Mr. Hastings had a state duty +and a judicial duty to perform. He was bound, as +Governor, knowing of such a conspiracy, to provide +for the public safety; and as a judge, he was bound +to convene a criminal court, and to lay before it a<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_242" id="Page_242">{242}</a></span> +detailed accusation of the offence. He was bound to +proceed publicly and legally against the accused, and +to convict him of his crime, previous to his inflicting, +or forming any intention of inflicting, punishment. +I say, my Lords, that Mr. Hastings, as a magistrate, +was bound to proceed against the Rajah either by +English law, by Mahometan law, or by the Gentoo +law; and that, by all or any of these laws, he was +bound to make the accused acquainted with the +crime alleged, to hear his answer to the charge, and +to produce evidence against him, in an open, clear, +and judicial manner. And here, my Lords, we have +again to remark, that the Mahometan law is a great +discriminator of persons, and that it prescribes the +mode of proceeding against those who are accused of +any delinquency requiring punishment, with a reference +to the distinction and rank which the accused +held in society. The proceedings are exceedingly +sober, regular, and respectful, even to criminals +charged with the highest crimes; and every magistrate +is required to exercise his office in the prescribed +manner. In the Hedaya, after declaring and discussing +the propriety of the Kâzi's sitting openly in the +execution of his office, it is added, that there is no +impropriety in the Kâzi sitting in his own house to +pass judgment, but it is requisite that he give orders +for a free access to the people. It then proceeds +thus:—"It is requisite that such people sit along +with the Kâzi as were used to sit with him, prior to +his appointment to the office; because, if he were +to sit alone in his house, he would thereby give rise +to suspicion."<a name="FNanchor_98_98" id="FNanchor_98_98"></a><a href="#Footnote_98_98" class="fnanchor" title=" Hedaya, Vol. II. p. 621.">[98]</a></p> + +<p>My Lords, having thus seen what the duty of a<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_243" id="Page_243">{243}</a></span> +judge is in such a case, let us examine whether Mr. +Hastings observed any part of the prescribed rules. +First, with regard to the publicity of the matter. Did +he ever give any notice to the Supreme Council of +the charges which he says he had received against +Cheyt Sing? Did he accuse the Rajah in the Council, +even when it was reduced to himself and his poor, +worn, down, cowed, and I am afraid bribed colleague, +Mr. Wheler? Did he even then, I ask, produce any +one charge against this man? He sat in Council as +a judge,—as an English judge,—as a Mahometan +judge,—as a judge by the Gentoo law, and by the +Law of Nature. He should have summoned the party +to appear in person, or by his attorney, before him, +and should have there informed him of the charge +against him. But, my Lords, he did not act thus. +He kept the accusation secret in his own bosom. +And why? Because he did not believe it to be true. +This may at least be inferred from his having never +informed the Council of the matter. He never informed +the Rajah of Benares of the suspicions entertained +against him, during the discussions which took +place respecting the multiplied demands that were +made upon him. He never told this victim, as he +has had the audacity to tell us and all this kingdom +in the paper that is before your Lordships, that he +looked upon these refusals to comply with his demands +to be overt acts of rebellion; nor did he ever +call upon him to answer or to justify himself with +regard to that imputed conspiracy or rebellion. Did +he tell Sadanund, the Rajah's agent, when that agent +was giving him a bribe or a present in secret, and +was thus endeavoring to deprecate his wrath, that he +accepted that bribe because his master was in rebel<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_244" id="Page_244">{244}</a></span>lion? +Never, my Lords; nor did he, when he first +reached Benares, and had the Rajah in his power, +suggest one word concerning this rebellion. Did +he, when he met Mr. Markham at Boglipore, where +they consulted about the destruction of this unhappy +man, did he tell Mr. Markham, or did Mr. Markham +insinuate to him, any one thing about this conspiracy +and rebellion? No, not a word there, or in his whole +progress up the country. While at Boglipore, he +wrote a letter to Lord Macartney upon the state of +the empire, giving him much and various advice. +Did he insinuate in that letter that he was going up +to Benares to suppress a rebellion of the Rajah Cheyt +Sing or to punish him? No, not a word. Did he, +my Lords, at the eve of his departure from Calcutta, +when he communicated his intention of taking +500,000<i>l.</i>, which he calls a fine or penalty, from the +Rajah, did he inform Mr. Wheler of it? No, not a +word of his rebellion, nor anything like it. Did he +inform his secret confidants, Mr. Anderson and Major +Palmer, upon that subject? Not a word, there was +not a word dropped from him of any such rebellion, +or of any intention in the Rajah Cheyt Sing to +rebel. Did he, when he had vakeels in every part +of the Mahratta empire and in the country of Sujah +Dowlah, when he had in most of those courts English +ambassadors and native spies, did he either from +ambassadors or spies receive anything like authentic +intelligence upon this subject? While he was at +Benares, he had in his hands Benaram Pundit, the +vakeel of the Rajah of Berar, his own confidential +friend, a person whom he took out of the service of +his master, and to whom he gave a jaghire in this +very zemindary of Benares. This man, so attached<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_245" id="Page_245">{245}</a></span> +to Mr. Hastings, so knowing in all the transactions +of India, neither accused Cheyt Sing of rebellious +intentions, or furnished Mr. Hastings with one single +proof that any conspiracy with any foreign power +existed.</p> + +<p>In this absence of evidence, My Lords, let us have +recourse to probability. Is it to be believed that the +Zemindar of Benares, a person whom Mr. Hastings +describes as being of a timid, weak, irresolute, and +feeble nature, should venture to make war alone +with the whole power of the Company in India, aided +by all the powers which Great Britain could bring +to the protection of its Indian empire? Could that +poor man, in his comparatively small district, possibly +have formed such an intention, without giving Mr. +Hastings access to the knowledge of the fact from +one or other of the numerous correspondents which +he had in that country?</p> + +<p>As to the Rajah's supposed intrigues with the Nabob +of Oude: this man was an actual prisoner of Mr. +Hastings, and nothing else,—a mere vassal, as he +says himself, in effect and substance, though not in +name. Can any one believe or think that Mr. Hastings +would not have received from the English Resident, +or from some one of that tribe of English gentlemen +and English military collectors who were placed +in that country in the exercise of the most arbitrary +powers, some intelligence which he could trust, if +any rebellious designs had really existed previous to +the rebellion which did actually break out upon his +arresting Cheyt Sing?</p> + +<p>There was an ancient Roman lawyer, of great fame +in the history of Roman jurisprudence, whom they +called <i>Cui Bono</i>, from his having first introduced into<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_246" id="Page_246">{246}</a></span> +juridical proceedings the argument, <i>What end or object +could the party have had in the art with which +he is accused?</i> Surely it may be here asked, Why +should Cheyt Sing wish to rebel, who held on easy and +moderate terms (for such I admit they were) a very +considerable territory, with every attribute of royalty +attached? The tribute was paid for protection, +which he had a right to claim, and which he actually +received. What reason under heaven could he have +to go and seek another master, to place himself under +the protection of Sujah Dowlah, in whose hands +Mr. Hastings tells you, in so many direct and plain +words, that neither the Rajah's property, his honor, +or his life could be safe? Was he to seek refuge +with the Mahrattas, who, though Gentoos like himself, +had reduced every nation which they subdued, +except those who were originally of their own empire, +to a severe servitude? Can any one believe +that he wished either for the one or the other of these +charges [changes?], or that he was desirous to quit +the happy independent situation in which he stood +under the protection of the British empire, from any +loose, wild, improbable notion of mending his condition? +My Lords, it is impossible. There is not one +particle of evidence, not one word of this charge on +record, prior to the publication of Mr. Hastings's Narrative; +and all the presumptive evidence in the world +would scarcely be sufficient to prove the fact, because +it is almost impossible that it should be true.</p> + +<p>But, my Lords, although Mr. Hastings swore to +the truth of this charge, when he came before the +House of Commons, yet in his Narrative he thus +fairly and candidly avowed that he entertained no +such opinion at the time. "Every step," says he,<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_247" id="Page_247">{247}</a></span> +"which I had taken before that fatal moment, namely, +the flight of Cheyt Sing, is an incontrovertible +proof that I had formed no design of seizing upon the +Rajah's treasures or of deposing him. And certainly, +at the time when I did form the design of making +the punishment that his former ill conduct deserved +subservient to the exigencies of the state by a large +fine, I did not believe him guilty of that premeditated +project for driving the English out of India with +which I afterwards charged him." Thus, then, he +declares upon oath that the Rajah's contumacy was +the ground of his suspecting him of rebellion, and +yet, when he comes to make his defence before the +House of Commons, he simply and candidly declares, +that, long after these alleged acts of contumacy had +taken place, he did not believe him to be guilty of +any such thing as rebellion, and that the fine imposed +upon him was for another reason and another purpose.</p> + +<p>In page 28 of your printed Minutes he thus declares +the purpose for which the fine was imposed:—"I +can answer only to this formidable dilemma, that, +so long as I conceived Cheyt Sing's misconduct and +contumacy to have me rather than the Company for +its object, at least to be merely the effect of pernicious +advice or misguided folly, without any formal +design of openly resisting our authority or disclaiming +our sovereignty, I looked upon a considerable fine +as sufficient both for his immediate punishment and +for binding him to future good behavior."</p> + +<p>Here, my Lords, the secret comes out. He declares +it was not for a rebellion or a suspicion of +rebellion that he resolved, over and above all his exorbitant +demands, to take from the Rajah 500,000<i>l.</i>,<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_248" id="Page_248">{248}</a></span> +(a good stout sum to be taken from a tributary power!)—that +it was not for misconduct of this kind +that he took this sum, but for personal ill behavior +towards himself. I must again beg your Lordships +to note that he then considered the Rajah's contumacy +as having for its object, not the Company, but +Warren Hastings, and that he afterwards declared +publicly to the House of Commons, and now before +your Lordships he declares finally and conclusively, +that he did believe Cheyt Sing to have had the criminal +intention imputed to him.</p> + +<p>"So long," says he, "as I conceived Cheyt Sing's +misconduct and contumacy to have <i>me</i>" (in Italics, +as he ordered it to be printed,) "rather than the +Company, for its object, so long I was satisfied with a +fine: I therefore entertained no serious thoughts of +expelling him, or proceeding otherwise to violence. +But when he and his people broke out into the most +atrocious acts of rebellion and murder, when the <i>jus +fortioris et lex ultima regum</i> were appealed to on his +part, and without any sufficient plea afforded him +on mine, I from that moment considered him as the +traitor and criminal described in the charge, and no +concessions, no humiliations, could ever after induce +me to settle on him the zemindary of Benares, or any +other territory, upon any footing whatever."</p> + +<p>Thus, then, my Lords, he has confessed that the +era and the only era of rebellion was when the tumult +broke out upon the act of violence offered by +himself to Cheyt Sing; and upon the ground of that +tumult, or rebellion as he calls it, he says he never +would suffer him to enjoy any territory or any right +whatever. We have fixed the period of the rebellion +for which he is supposed to have exacted this fine;<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_249" id="Page_249">{249}</a></span> +this period of rebellion was after the exaction of the +fine itself: so that the fine was not laid for the rebellion, +but the rebellion broke out in consequence of +the fine, and the violent measure accompanying it. +We have established this, and the whole human race +cannot shake it. He went up the country through +malice, to revenge his own private wrongs, not those +of the Company. He fixed 500,000<i>l.</i> as a mulct for +an insult offered to himself, and then a rebellion +broke out in consequence of his violence. This was +the rebellion, and the only rebellion; it was Warren +Hastings's rebellion,—a rebellion which arose from +his own dreadful exaction, from his pride, from his +malice and insatiable avarice,—a rebellion which +arose from his abominable tyranny, from his lust of +arbitrary power, and from his determination to follow +the examples of Sujah Dowlah, Asoph ul Dowlah, +Cossim Ali Khân, Aliverdy Khân, and all the gang of +rebels who are the objects of his imitation.</p> + +<p>"<i>My patience</i>," says he, "<i>was exhausted</i>." Your +Lordships have, and ought to have, a judicial patience. +Mr. Hastings has none of any kind. I hold +that patience is one of the great virtues of a governor; +it was said of Moses, that he governed by patience, +and that he was the meekest man upon earth. Patience +is also the distinguishing character of a judge; +and I think your Lordships, both with regard to us +and with regard to him, have shown a great deal of +it: we shall ever honor the quality, and if we pretend +to say that we have had great patience in going +through this trial, so your Lordships must have had +great patience in hearing it. But this man's patience, +as he himself tells you, was soon exhausted. +"I considered," he says, "the light in which such<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_250" id="Page_250">{250}</a></span> +behavior would have been viewed by his native sovereign, +and I resolved he should feel the power he had +so long insulted. Forty or fifty lacs of rupees would +have been a moderate fine for Sujah ul Dowlah to exact,—he +who had demanded twenty-five lacs for the +mere fine of succession, and received twenty in hand, +and an increased rent tantamount to considerably +above thirty lacs more; and therefore I rejected the +offer of twenty, with which the Rajah would have +compromised for his guilt when it was too late."</p> + +<p>Now, my Lords, observe who his models were, +when he intended to punish this man for an insult +on himself. Did he consult the laws? Did he look +to the Institutes of Timour, or to those of Genghis +Khân? Did he look to the Hedaya, or to any of the +approved authorities in this country? No, my Lords, +he exactly followed the advice which Longinus gives +to a great writer:—"Whenever you have a mind to +elevate your mind, to raise it to its highest pitch, and +even to exceed yourself, upon any subject, think how +Homer would have described it, how Plato would +have imagined it, and how Demosthenes would have +expressed it; and when you have so done, you will +then, no doubt, have a standard which will raise you +up to the dignity of anything that human genius can +aspire to." Mr. Hastings was calling upon himself, +and raising his mind to the dignity of what tyranny +could do, what unrighteous exaction could perform. +He considered, he says, how much Sujah Dowlah +would have exacted, and that he thinks would not +be too much for him to exact. He boldly avows,—"I +raised my mind to the elevation of Sujah Dowlah; +I considered what Cossim Ali Khân would have done, +or Aliverdy Khân, who murdered and robbed so<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_251" id="Page_251">{251}</a></span> +many, I had all this line of great examples before +me, and I asked myself what fine they would have +exacted upon such an occasion. But," says he, +"Sujah Dowlah levied a fine of twenty lacs for a +right of succession."</p> + +<p>Good God! my Lords, if you are not appalled +with the violent injustice of arbitrary proceedings, +you must feel something humiliating at the gross +ignorance of men who are in this manner playing +with the rights of mankind. This man confounds +a fine upon succession with a fine of penalty. He +takes advantage of a defect in the technical language +of our law, which, I am sorry to say, is not, in many +parts, as correct in its distinctions and as wise in its +provisions as the Mahometan law. We use the word +<i>fine</i> in three senses: first, as a punishment and penalty; +secondly, as a formal means of cutting off by +one form the ties of another form, which we call +levying a fine; and, thirdly, we use the word to +signify a sum of money payable upon renewal of a +lease or copyhold. The word has in each case a +totally different sense; but such is the stupidity and +barbarism of the prisoner, that he confounds these +senses, and tells you Sujah Dowlah took twenty-five +lacs as a fine from Cheyt Sing for the renewal of his +zemindary, and therefore, as a punishment for his +offences, he shall take fifty. Suppose any one of +your Lordships, or of us, were to be fined for assault +and battery, or for anything else, and it should be +said, "You paid such a fine for a bishop's lease, you +paid such a fine on the purchase of an estate, and +therefore, now that you are going to be fined for a +punishment, we will take the measure of the fine, +not from the nature and quality of your offence, not<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_252" id="Page_252">{252}</a></span> +from the law upon the subject, or from your ability +to pay, but the amount of a fine you paid some years +ago for an estate shall be the measure of your punishment." +My Lords, what should we say of such +brutish ignorance, and such shocking confusion of +ideas?</p> + +<p>When this man had elevated his mind according +to the rules of art, and stimulated himself to great +things by great examples, he goes on to tell you that +he rejected the offer of twenty lacs with which the +Rajah would have compounded for his guilt when it +was too late.</p> + +<p>Permit me, my Lords, to say a few words here, +by way of referring back all this monstrous heap of +violence and absurdity to some degree of principle. +Mr. Hastings having completely acquitted the Rajah +of any other fault than contumacy, and having supposed +even that to be only personal to himself, he +thought a fine of 500,000<i>l.</i> would be a proper punishment. +Now, when any man goes to exact a fine, it +presupposes inquiry, charge, defence, and judgment. +It does so in the Mahometan law; it does so in the +Gentoo law; it does so in the law of England, in the +Roman law, and in the law, I believe, of every nation +under heaven, except in that law which resides +in the arbitrary breast of Mr. Hastings, poisoned by +the principles and stimulated by the examples of +those wicked traitors and rebels whom I have before +described. He mentions his intention of levying a +fine; but does he make any mention of having +charged the Rajah with his offences? It appears +that he held an incredible quantity of private correspondence +through the various Residents, through +Mr. Graham, Mr. Fowke, Mr. Markham, Mr. Benn,<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_253" id="Page_253">{253}</a></span> +concerning the affairs of that country. Did he ever, +upon this alleged contumacy, (for at present I put +the rebellion out of the question,) inquire the progress +of this personal affront offered to the Governor-General +of Bengal? Did he ever state it to the +Rajah, or did he call his vakeel before the Council to +answer the charge? Did he examine any one person, +or particularize a single fact, in any manner whatever? +No. What, then, did he do? Why, my +Lords, he declared himself the person injured, stood +forward as the accuser, assumed the office of judge, +and proceeded to judgment without a party before +him, without trial, without examination, without +proof. He thus directly reversed the order of justice. +He determined to fine the Rajah when his own +patience, as he says, was exhausted, not when justice +demanded the punishment. He resolved to fine him +in the enormous sum of 500,000<i>l.</i> Does he inform +the Council of this determination? No. The Court +of Directors? No. Any one of his confidants? No, +not one of them,—not Mr. Palmer, not Mr. Middleton, +nor any of that legion of secretaries that he had; +nor did he even inform Mr. Malcolm [Markham?] of +his intentions, until he met him at Boglipore.</p> + +<p>In regard to the object of his malice, we only know +that many letters came from Cheyt Sing to Mr. Hastings, +in which the unfortunate man endeavored to appease +his wrath, and to none of which he ever gave +an answer. He is an accuser preferring a charge and +receiving apologies, without giving the party an answer, +although he had a crowd of secretaries about +him, maintained at the expense of the miserable people +of Benares, and paid by sums of money drawn +fraudulently from their pockets. Still not one word<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_254" id="Page_254">{254}</a></span> +of answer was given, till he had formed the resolution +of exacting a fine, and had actually by torture made +his victim's servant discover where his master's treasures +lay, in order that he might rob him of all his +family possessed. Are these the proceedings of a +British judge? or are they not rather such as are +described by Lord Coke (and these learned gentlemen, +I dare say, will remember the passage; it is too +striking not to be remembered) as <i>"the damned and +damnable proceedings of a judge in hell</i>"? Such a +judge has the prisoner at your bar proved himself to +be. First he determines upon the punishment, then +he prepares the accusation, and then by torture and +violence endeavors to extort the fine.</p> + +<p>My Lords, I must again beg leave to call your attention +to his mode of proceeding in this business. +He never entered any charge. He never answered +any letter. Not that he was idle. He was carrying +on a wicked and clandestine plot for the destruction +of the Rajah, under the pretence of this fine; although +the plot was not known, I verily believe, to +any European at the time. He does not pretend +that he told any one of the Company's servants of his +intentions of fining the Rajah; but that some hostile +project against him had been formed by Mr. Hastings +was perfectly well known to the natives. Mr. Hastings +tells you, that Cheyt Sing had a vakeel at Calcutta, +whose business it was to learn the general +transactions of our government, and the most minute +particulars which could in any manner affect the interest +of his employer.</p> + +<p>I must here tell your Lordships, that there is no +court in Asia, from the highest to the lowest, no +petty sovereign, that does not both employ and re<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_255" id="Page_255">{255}</a></span>ceive +what they call <i>hircarrahs</i>, or, in other words, +persons to collect and to communicate political intelligence. +These men are received with the state and +in the rank of ambassadors; they have their place in +the durbar; and their business, as authorized spies, is +as well known there as that of ambassadors extraordinary +and ordinary in the courts of Europe. Mr. +Hastings had a public spy, in the person of the Resident, +at Benares, and he had a private spy there in +another person. The spies employed by the native +powers had by some means come to the knowledge +of Mr. Hastings's clandestine and wicked intentions +towards this unhappy man, Cheyt Sing, and his unhappy +country, and of his designs for the destruction +and the utter ruin of both. He has himself told you, +and he has got Mr. Anderson to vouch it, that he had +received proposals for the sale of this miserable man +and his country. And from whom did he receive +these proposals, my Lords? Why, from the Nabob +Asoph ul Dowlah, to whom he threatened to transfer +both the person of the Rajah and his zemindary, if he +did not redeem himself by some pecuniary sacrifice. +Now Asoph ul Dowlah, as appears by the minutes on +your Lordships' table, was at that time a bankrupt. +He was in debt to the Company tenfold more than he +could pay, and all his revenues were sequestered for +that debt. He was a person of the last degree of +indolence with the last degree of rapacity,—a man +of whom Mr. Hastings declared, that he had wasted +and destroyed by his misgovernment the fairest provinces +upon earth, that not a person in his dominions +was secure from his violence, and that even his own +father could not enjoy his life and honor in safety +under him. This avaricious bankrupt tyrant, who<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_256" id="Page_256">{256}</a></span> +had beggared and destroyed his own subjects, and +could not pay his debts to the English government, +was the man with whom Mr. Hastings was in treaty +to deliver up Cheyt Sing and his country, under pretence +of his not having paid regularly to the Company +those customary payments which the tyrant +would probably have never paid at all, if he had +been put in possession of the country. This I mention +to illustrate Mr. Hastings's plans of economy +and finance, without considering the injustice and +cruelty of delivering up a man to the hereditary enemy +of his family.</p> + +<p>It is known, my Lords, that Mr. Hastings, besides +having received proposals for delivering up the beautiful +country of Benares, that garden of God, as it is +styled in India, to that monster, that rapacious tyrant, +Asoph ul Dowlah, who with his gang of mercenary +troops had desolated his own country like a swarm +of locusts, had purposed likewise to seize Cheyt Sing's +own patrimonial forts, which was nothing less than +to take from him the residence of his women and +his children, the seat of his honor, the place in which +the remaining treasures and last hopes of his family +were centred. By the Gentoo law, every lord or supreme +magistrate is bound to construct and to live in +such a fort. It is the usage of India, and is a matter +of state and dignity, as well as of propriety, reason, +and defence. It was probably an apprehension of being +injured in this tender point, as well as a knowledge +of the proposal made by the Nabob, which +induced Cheyt Sing to offer to buy himself off; although +it does not appear from any part of the +evidence that he assigned any other reason than +that of Mr. Hastings intending to exact from him<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_257" id="Page_257">{257}</a></span> +six lacs of rupees over and above his other exactions.</p> + +<p>Mr. Hastings, indeed, almost acknowledges the existence +of this plot against the Rajah, and his being +the author of it. He says, without any denial of +the fact, that the Rajah suspected some strong acts +to be intended against him, and therefore asked +Mr. Markham whether he could not buy them off +and obtain Mr. Hastings's favor by the payment of +200,000<i>l.</i> Mr. Markham gave as his opinion, that +200,000<i>l.</i> was not sufficient; and the next day the +Rajah offered 20,000<i>l.</i> more, in all 220,000<i>l.</i> The +negotiation, however, broke off; and why? Not, as +Mr. Markham says he conjectured, because the Rajah +had learned that Mr. Hastings had no longer an intention +of imposing these six lacs, or something to +that effect, and therefore retracted his offer, but because +that offer had been rejected by Mr. Hastings.</p> + +<p>Let us hear what reason the man who was in the +true secret gives for not accepting the Rajah's offer. +"I rejected," says Mr. Hastings, "the offer of twenty +lacs, with which the Rajah would have compromised +for his guilt when it was too late." My Lords, he +best knows what the motives of his own actions were. +He says, the offer was made "when it was too late." +Had he previously told the Rajah what sum of money +he would be required to pay in order to buy himself +off, or had he required him to name any sum +which he was willing to pay? Did he, after having +refused the offer made by the Rajah, say, "Come +and make me a better offer, or upon such a day I +shall declare that your offers are inadmissible"? +No such thing appears. Your Lordships will further<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_258" id="Page_258">{258}</a></span> +remark, that Mr. Hastings refused the 200,000<i>l.</i> at +a time when the exigencies of the Company were +so pressing that he was obliged to rob, pilfer, and +steal upon every side,—at a time when he was borrowing +40,000<i>l.</i> from Mr. Sulivan in one morning, +and raising by other under-jobs 27,000<i>l.</i> more. In the +distress [in?] which his own extravagance and prodigality +had involved him, 200,000<i>l.</i> would have been +a weighty benefit, although derived from his villany; +but this relief he positively refused, because, says +he, "the offer came too late." From these words, +my Lords, we may infer that there was a time when +the offer would not have been "too late,"—a period +at which it would have been readily accepted. No +such thing appears. There is not a trace upon your +minutes, not a trace in the correspondence of the +Company, to prove that the Rajah would at any +time have been permitted to buy himself off from +this complicated tyranny.</p> + +<p>I have already stated a curious circumstance in +this proceeding, to which I must again beg leave to +direct your Lordships' attention. Does it anywhere +appear in that correspondence, or in the testimony +of Mr. Benn, of Mr. Markham, or of any human being, +that Mr. Hastings had ever told Cheyt Sing with +what sum he should be satisfied? There is evidence +before you directly in proof that they did not know +the amount. Not one person knew what his intention +was, when he refused this 200,000<i>l.</i> For when +he met Mr. Markham at Boglipore, and for the +first time mentioned the sum of 500,000<i>l.</i> as the +fine he meant to exact, Mr. Markham was astonished +and confounded at its magnitude. He tells you this +himself. It appears, then, that neither Cheyt Sing<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_259" id="Page_259">{259}</a></span> +nor the Resident at Benares (who ought to have +been in the secret, if upon such an occasion secrecy +is allowable) ever knew what the terms were. The +Rajah was in the dark; he was left to feel, blindfold, +how much money could relieve him from the iniquitous +intentions of Mr. Hastings; and at last he is +told that his offer comes too late, without having +ever been told the period at which it would have +been well-timed, or the amount it was proposed to +take from him. Is this, my Lords, the proper way +to adjudge a fine?</p> + +<p>Your Lordships will now be pleased to advert to +the manner in which he defends himself and these +proceedings. He says, "I rejected this offer of +twenty lacs, with which the Rajah would have compromised +for his guilt when it was too late." If by +these words he means too late to answer the purpose +for which he has said the fine was designed, namely, +the relief of the Company, the ground of his defence +is absolutely false; for it is notorious that at the +time referred to the Company's affairs were in the +greatest distress.</p> + +<p>I will next call your Lordships' attention to the +projected sale of Benares to the Nabob of Oude. +"If," says Mr. Hastings, "I ever talked of selling +the Company's sovereignty over Benares to the Nabob +of Oude, it was but <i>in terrorem</i>; and no subsequent +act of mine warrants the supposition of my +having seriously intended it." And in another place +he says, "If I ever threatened" (your Lordships will +remark, that he puts hypothetically a matter the +reality of which he has got to be solemnly declared +on an affidavit, and in a narrative to the truth of +which he has deposed upon oath)—"if I ever<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_260" id="Page_260">{260}</a></span> +threatened," says he, "to dispossess the Rajah of +his territories, it is no more than what my predecessors, +without rebuke from their superiors, or notice +taken of the expression, had wished and intended +to have done to his father, even when the Company +had no pretensions to the sovereignty of the country. +It is no more than such a legal act of sovereignty +as his behavior justified, and as I was justified in +by the intentions of my predecessors. If I pretended +to seize upon his forts, it was in full conviction +that a dependant on the Company, guarantied, maintained, +and protected in his country by the Company's +arms, had no occasion for forts, had no right +to them, and could hold them for no other than +suspected and rebellious purposes. None of the +Company's other zemindars are permitted to maintain +them; and even our ally, the Nabob of the +Carnatic, has the Company's troops in all his garrisons. +Policy and public safety absolutely require +it. What state could exist that allowed its inferior +members to hold forts and garrisons independent of +the superior administration? It is a solecism in government +to suppose it."</p> + +<p>Here, then, my Lords, he first declares that this +was merely done <i>in terrorem</i>; that he never intended +to execute the abominable act. And will your Lordships +patiently endure that such terrific threats as +these shall be hung by your Governor in India over +the unhappy people that are subject to him and +protected by British faith? Will you permit, that, +for the purpose of extorting money, a Governor shall +hold out the terrible threat of delivering a tributary +prince and his people, bound hand and foot, into the +power of their perfidious enemies?<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_261" id="Page_261">{261}</a></span></p> + +<p>The terror occasioned by threatening to take from +him his forts can only be estimated by considering, +that, agreeably to the religion and prejudices of Hindoos, +the forts are the places in which their women +are lodged, in which, according to their notions, +their honor is deposited, and in which is lodged all +the wealth that they can save against an evil day to +purchase off the vengeance of an enemy. These forts +Mr. Hastings says he intended to take, because the +Rajah could hold them for no other than rebellious +and suspected purposes. Now I will show your +Lordships that the man who has the horrible audacity +to make this declaration did himself assign to the +Rajah these very forts. He put him in possession +of them, and, when there was a dispute about the +Nabob's rights to them on the one side and the +Company's on the other, did confirm them to this +man. The paper shall be produced, that you may +have before your eyes the gross contradictions into +which his rapacity and acts of arbitrary power have +betrayed him. Thank God, my Lords, men that are +greatly guilty are never wise. I repeat it, men that +are greatly guilty are never wise. In their defence +of one crime they are sure to meet the ghost of some +former defence, which, like the spectre in Virgil, +drives them back. The prisoner at your bar, like +the hero of the poet, when he attempts to make his +escape by one evasion, is stopped by the appearance +of some former contradictory averment. If he +attempts to escape by one door, there his criminal +allegations of one kind stop him; if he attempts to +escape at another, the facts and allegations intended +for some other wicked purpose stare him full in +the face.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_262" id="Page_262">{262}</a></span></p> + +<div class="poem"><div class="stanza"> +<span class="i5">Quacunque viam sibi fraude petivit,<br /></span> +<span class="i0">Successum Dea dira negat.<br /></span> +</div></div> + +<p>The paper I hold in my hand contains Nundcomar's +accusation of Mr. Hastings. It consists of a +variety of charges; and I will first read to you what +is said by Nundcomar of these forts, which it is pretended +could be held for none but suspicious and rebellious +purposes.</p> + +<p>"At the time Mr. Hastings was going to Benares, +he desired me to give him an account in writing of +any lands which, though properly belonging to the +Subah of Bahar, might have come under the dominion +of Bulwant Sing, that they might be recovered +from his son, Rajah Cheyt Sing. The purgunnahs +of Kera, Mungrora, and Bidjegur were exactly in +this situation, having been usurped by Bulwant Sing +from the Subah of Bahar. I accordingly delivered to +Mr. Hastings the accounts of them, from the entrance +of the Company upon the dewanny to the year 1179 +of the Fusseli era, stated at twenty-four lacs. Mr. +Hastings said, 'Give a copy of this to Roy Rada +Churn, that, if Cheyt Sing is backward in acknowledging +this claim, Rada Churn may answer and +confute him.' Why Mr. Hastings, when he arrived +at Benares, and had called Rajah Cheyt Sing before +him, left these countries still in the Rajah's usurpations +it remains with Mr. Hastings to explain."</p> + +<p>This is Nundcomar's charge. Here follows Mr. +Hastings's reply.</p> + +<p>"I recollect an information given me by Nundcomar +concerning the pretended usurpations made by +the Rajah of Benares, of the purgunnahs of Kera, +Mungrora, and Bidjegur." (Your Lordships will +recollect that Bidjegur is one of those very forts<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_263" id="Page_263">{263}</a></span> +which he declares could not be held but for suspicious +and rebellious purposes.) "I do not recollect +his mentioning it again, when I set out for Benares; +neither did I ever intimate the subject, either to +Cheyt Sing or his ministers, because I knew I could +not support the claim; and to have made it and +dropped it would have been in every sense dishonorable. +Not that I passed by it with indifference or +inattention. I took pains to investigate the foundation +of this title, and recommended it to the particular +inquiry of Mr. Vansittart, who was the Chief of +Patna, at the time in which I received the first intimation. +The following letter and voucher, which +I received from him, contain a complete statement +of this pretended usurpation."</p> + +<p>These vouchers will answer our purpose, fully to +establish that in his opinion the claim of the English +government upon those forts was at that time totally +unfounded, and so absurd that he did not even dare +to mention it. This fort of Bidjegur, the most considerable +in the country, and of which we shall have +much to say hereafter, is the place in which Cheyt +Sing had deposited his women and family. That +fortress did Mr. Hastings himself give to this very +man, deciding in his favor as a judge, upon an examination +and after an inquiry: and yet he now declares +that he had no right to it, and that he could +not hold it but for wicked and rebellious purposes. +But, my Lords, when he changed this language, he +had resolved to take away these forts,—to destroy +them,—to root the Rajah out of every place of refuge, +out of every secure place in which he could +hide his head, or screen himself from the rancor, revenge, +avarice, and malice of his ruthless foe. He<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_264" id="Page_264">{264}</a></span> +was resolved to have them, although he had, upon +the fullest conviction of the Rajah's right, given them +to this very man, and put him into the absolute possession +of them.</p> + +<p>Again, my Lords, did he, when Cheyt Sing, in +1775, was put in possession by the <i>pottah</i> of the +Governor-General and Council, which contains an +enumeration of the names of all the places which +were given up to him, and consequently of this +among the rest,—did he, either before he put the +question in Council upon that pottah, or afterwards, +tell the Council they were going to put forts into +the man's hands to which he had no right, and which +could be held only for rebellious and suspected purposes? +We refer your Lordships to the places in +which all these transactions are mentioned, and you +will there find Mr. Hastings took no one exception +whatever against them; nor, till he was resolved +upon the destruction of this unhappy man, did he +ever so much as mention them. It was not till then +that he discovers the possession of these forts by the +Rajah to be <i>a solecism in government</i>.</p> + +<p>After quoting the noble examples of Sujah Dowlah, +and the other persons whom I have mentioned to +you, he proceeds to say, that some of his predecessors, +without any pretensions to sovereign authority, +endeavored to get these forts into their possession; +and "I was justified," says he, "by the intention of +my predecessors." Merciful God! if anything can +surpass what he has said before, it is this: "My +predecessors, without any title of sovereignty, without +any right whatever, wished to get these forts +into their power; I therefore have a right to do +what they wished to do; and I am justified, not by<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_265" id="Page_265">{265}</a></span> +the acts, but by the <i>intentions</i> of my predecessors." +At the same time he knows that these predecessors +had been reprobated by the Company for this part +of their proceedings; he knew that he was sent +there to introduce a better system, and to put an +end to this state of rapacity. Still, whatever his +predecessors <i>wished</i>, however unjust and violent it +might be, when the sovereignty came into his hands, +he maintains that he had a right to do all which +they were desirous of accomplishing. Thus the enormities +formerly practised, which the Company sent +him to correct, became a sacred standard for his imitation.</p> + +<p>Your Lordships will observe that he slips in the +word <i>sovereignty</i> and forgets compact; because it is +plain, and your Lordships must perceive it, that, +wherever he uses the word sovereignty, he uses it +to destroy the authority of all compacts; and accordingly +in the passage now before us he declares that +there is an invalidity in all compacts entered into in +India, from the nature, state, and constitution of that +empire. "From the disorderly form of its government," +says he, "there is an invalidity in all compacts +and treaties whatever." "Persons who had no treaty +with the Rajah wished," says he, "to rob him: therefore +I, who have a treaty with him, and call myself +his sovereign, have a right to realize all their wishes."</p> + +<p>But the fact is, my Lords, that his predecessors +never did propose to deprive Bulwant Sing, the father +of Cheyt Sing, of his zemindary. They, indeed, +wished to have had the dewanny transferred to them, +in the manner it has since been transferred to the +Company. They wished to receive his rents, and to +be made an intermediate party between him and the<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_266" id="Page_266">{266}</a></span> +Mogul emperor, his sovereign. These predecessors +had entered into no compact with the man: they +were negotiating with his sovereign for the transfer +of the dewanny or stewardship of the country, which +transfer was afterwards actually executed; but they +were obliged to give the country itself back again +to Bulwant Sing, with a guaranty against all the +pretensions of Sujah Dowlah, who had tyrannically +assumed an arbitrary power over it. This power +the predecessors of Mr. Hastings might also have +wished to assume; and he may therefore say, according +to the mode of reasoning which he has +adopted,—"Whatever they wished to do, but never +succeeded in doing, I may and ought to do of my +own will. Whatever fine Sujah Dowlah would have +exacted I will exact. I will penetrate into that +tiger's bosom, and discover the latent seeds of rapacity +and injustice which lurk there, and I will +make him the subject of my imitation."</p> + +<p>These are the principles upon which, without accuser, +without judge, without inquiry, he resolved +to lay a fine of 500,000<i>l.</i> on Cheyt Sing!</p> + +<p>In order to bind himself to a strict fulfilment of +this resolution, he has laid down another very extraordinary +doctrine. He has laid it down as a sort +of canon, (in injustice and corruption,) that, whatever +demand, whether just or unjust, a man declares +his intention of making upon another, he should exact +the precise sum which he has determined upon, +and that, if he takes anything less, it is a proof of +corruption. "I have," says he, "shown by this +testimony that I never intended to make any communication +to Cheyt Sing of taking less than the +fifty lacs which in my own mind I had resolved to<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_267" id="Page_267">{267}</a></span> +exact." And he adds,—"I shall make my last and +solemn appeal to the breast of every man who shall +read this, whether it is likely, or morally possible, +that I should have tied down my own future conduct +to so decided a process and series of acts, if +I had secretly intended to threaten, or to use a degree +of violence, for no other purpose than to draw +from the object of it a mercenary atonement for my +own private emolument, and suffer all this tumult +to terminate in an ostensible and unsubstantial submission +to the authority which I represented."</p> + +<p>He had just before said, "If I ever talked of +selling the Company's sovereignty to the Nabob of +Oude, it was only <i>in terrorem</i>." In the face of this +assertion, he here gives you to understand he never +held out anything <i>in terrorem</i>, but what he intended +to execute. But we will show you that in fact he +had reserved to himself a power of acting <i>pro re +nata</i>, and that he intended to compound or not, just +as answered his purposes upon this occasion. "I +admit," he says, "that I did not enter it [the intention +of fining Cheyt Sing] on the Consultations, +because it was not necessary; even this plan itself +of the fine was not a fixed plan, but to be regulated +by circumstances, both as to the substantial execution +of it and the mode." Now here is a man +who has given it in a sworn narrative, that he did +not intend to have a farthing less. Why? "Because +I should have menaced and done as in former +times has been done,—made great and violent demands +which I reduce afterwards for my own corrupt +purposes." Yet he tells you in the course of +the same defence, but in another paper, that he had +no fixed plan, that he did not know whether he<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_268" id="Page_268">{268}</a></span> +should exact a fine at all, or what should be his +mode of executing it.</p> + +<p>My Lords, what shall we say to this man, who +declares that it would be a proof of corruption not +to exact the full sum which he had threatened to +exact, but who, finding that this doctrine would +press hard upon him, and be considered as a proof +of cruelty and injustice, turns round and declares he +had no intention of exacting anything? What shall +we say to a man who thus reserves his determination, +who threatens to sell a tributary prince to a tyrant, +and cannot decide whether he should take from him +his forts and pillage him of all he had, whether he +should raise 500,000<i>l.</i> upon him, whether he should +accept the 220,000<i>l.</i> offered, (which, by the way, we +never knew of till long after the whole transaction,) +whether he should do any or all of those things, +and then, by his own account, going up to Benares +without having resolved anything upon this important +subject?</p> + +<p>My Lords, I will now assume the hypothesis that +he at last discovered sufficient proof of rebellious +practices; still even this gave him no right to adduce +such rebellion in justification of resolutions which +he had taken, of acts which he had done, before he +knew anything of its existence. To such a plea we +answer, and your Lordships will every one of you answer,—"You +shall not by a subsequent discovery +of rebellious practices, which you did not know at +the time, and which you did not even believe, as you +have expressly told us here, justify your conduct prior +to that discovery." If the conspiracy which he +falsely imputes to Cheyt Sing, if that wild scheme of +driving the English out of India, had existed, think<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_269" id="Page_269">{269}</a></span> +in what miserable circumstances we stand as prosecutors, +and your Lordships as judges, if we admit a +discovery to be pleaded in justification of antecedent +acts founded upon the assumed existence of that +which he had no sort of proof, knowledge, or belief +of!</p> + +<p>My Lords, we shall now proceed to another circumstance, +not less culpable in itself, though less +shocking to your feelings, than those to which I have +already called your attention: a circumstance which +throws a strong presumption of guilt upon every part +of the prisoner's conduct. Having formed all these +infernal plots in his mind, but uncertain which of +them he should execute, uncertain what sums of +money he should extort, whether he should deliver +up the Rajah to his enemy or pillage his forts, he +goes up to Benares; but he first delegates to himself +all the powers of government, both civil and +military, in the countries which he was going to +visit.</p> + +<p>My Lords, we have asserted in our charge that +this delegation and division of power was illegal. He +invested <i>himself</i> with this authority; for <i>he</i> was the +majority in the Council: Mr. Wheler's consent or +dissent signifying nothing. He gave himself powers +which the act of Parliament did not give him. He +went up to Benares with an illegal commission, civil +and military; and to prove this I shall beg leave to +read the provisions of the act of Parliament. I shall +show what the creature ought to be, by showing the +law of the creator: what the legislature of Great +Britain meant that Governor Hastings should be, not +what he made himself.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_270" id="Page_270">{270}</a></span></p> + +<div class="blockquote"><p class="center">[<i>Mr. Burke then read the seventh section of the act.</i>]</p></div> + +<p>Now we do deny that there is by this act given, or +that under this act there can be given, to the government +of India, a power of dividing its unity into +two parts, each of which shall separately be a unity +and possess the power given to the whole. Yet, my +Lords, an agreement was made between him and +Mr. Wheler, that he (Mr. Hastings) should have +every power, civil and military, in the upper provinces, +and that Mr. Wheler should enjoy equal authority +in the lower ones.</p> + +<p>Now, to show you that it is impossible for such +an agreement to be legal, we must refer you to the +constitution of the Company's government. The +whole power is vested in the Council, where all +questions are to be decided by a majority of voices, +and the members are directed to record in the minutes +of their proceedings not only the questions decided, +but the grounds upon which each individual +member founds his vote. Now, although the Council +is competent to delegate its authority for any <i>specific</i> +purpose to any servant of the Company, yet to admit +that it can delegate its authority <i>generally</i>, without +reserving the means of deliberation and control, +would be to change the whole constitution. By such +a proceeding the government may be divided into a +number of independent governments, without a common +deliberative Council and control. This deliberative +capacity, which is so strictly guarded by the +obligation of recording its consultations, would be totally +annihilated, if the Council divided itself into +independent parts, each acting according to its own +discretion. There is no similar instance in law,<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_271" id="Page_271">{271}</a></span> +there is no similar instance in policy. The conduct +of these men implies a direct contradiction; and you +will see, by the agreement they made to support each +other, that they were themselves conscious of the illegality +of this proceeding.</p> + +<p>After Mr. Hastings had conferred absolute power +upon himself during his stay in the upper provinces +by an order of Council, (of which Council he was +himself a majority,) he entered the following minute +in the Consultations. "The Governor-General delivers +in the following minute. In my minute which I +laid before the court on the 21st May, I expressed +the satisfaction with which I could at this juncture +leave the Presidency, from the mutual confidence +which was happily established between Mr. Wheler +and me. I now readily repeat that sentiment, and +observe with pleasure that Mr. Wheler confirms it. +Before my departure, it is probable that we shall in +concert have provided at the board for almost every +important circumstance that can eventually happen +during my absence; but if any should occur for +which no previous provision shall have been made +in the resolutions of the board, Mr. Wheler may act +with immediate decision, and with the fullest confidence +of my support, in all such emergencies, as well +as in conducting the ordinary business of the Presidency, +and in general in all matters of this government, +excepting those which may specially or generally +be intrusted to me. Mr. Wheler during my +absence may consider himself as possessed of the +full powers of the Governor-General and Council of +this government, as in effect he is by the constitution; +and he may be assured, that, so far as my +sanction and concurrence shall be, or be deemed,<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_272" id="Page_272">{272}</a></span> +necessary to the confirmation of his measures, he +shall receive them."</p> + +<p>Now here is a compact of iniquity between these +two duumvirs. They each give to the other the full, +complete, and perfect powers of the government; +and in order to secure themselves against any obstacles +that might arise, they mutually engage to +ratify each other's acts: and they say this is not +illegal, because Lord Cornwallis has had such a deputation. +I must first beg leave to observe that no +man can justify himself in doing any illegal act by +its having been done by another; much less can he +justify his own illegal act by pleading an act of the +same kind done subsequently to his act, because the +latter may have been done in consequence of his +bad example. Men justify their acts in two ways,—by +law and by precedent; the former asserts the +right, the latter presumes it from the example of +others. But can any man justify an act, because ten +or a dozen years after another man has done the +same thing? Good heavens! was there ever such +a doctrine before heard? Suppose Lord Cornwallis +to have done wrong; suppose him to have acted illegally; +does that clear the prisoner at your bar? +No: on the contrary, it aggravates his offence; because +he has afforded others an example of corrupt +and illegal conduct. But if even Lord Cornwallis +had preceded, instead of following him, the example +would not have furnished a justification. There is +no resemblance in the cases. Lord Cornwallis does +not hold his government by the act of 1773, but by +a special act made afterwards; and therefore to attempt +to justify acts done under one form of appointment +by acts done under another form is to the last<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_273" id="Page_273">{273}</a></span> +degree wild and absurd. Lord Cornwallis was going +to conduct a war of great magnitude, and was consequently +trusted with extraordinary powers. He went +in the two characters of governor and commander-in-chief; +and yet the legislature was sensible of the +doubtful validity of a Governor-General's carrying +with him the whole powers of the Council. But +Mr. Hastings was not commander-in-chief, when he +assumed the whole military as well as civil power. +Lord Cornwallis, as I have just said, was not only +commander-in-chief, but was going to a great war, +where he might have occasion to treat with the country +powers in a civil capacity; and yet so doubtful +was the legislature upon this point, that they passed +a special act to confirm that delegation, and to give +him a power of acting under it.</p> + +<p>My Lords, we do further contend that Mr. Hastings +had no right to assume the character of commander-in-chief; +for he was no military man, nor was he +appointed by the Company to that trust. His assumption +of the military authority was a gross usurpation. +It was an authority to which he would have +had no right, if the whole powers of government were +vested in him, and he had carried his Council with +him on his horse. If, I say, Mr. Hastings had his +Council on his crupper, he could neither have given +those powers to himself nor made a partition of them +with Mr. Wheler. Could Lord Cornwallis, for instance, +who carried with him the power of commander-in-chief, +and authority to conclude treaties +with all the native powers, could he, I ask, have left +a Council behind him in Calcutta with equal powers, +who might have concluded treaties in direct contradiction +to those in which he was engaged? Clearly<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_274" id="Page_274">{274}</a></span> +he could not; therefore I contend that this partition +of power, which supposes an integral authority in +each counsellor, is a monster that cannot exist. +This the parties themselves felt so strongly that they +were obliged to have recourse to a stratagem scarcely +less absurd than their divided assumption of power. +They entered into a compact to confirm each other's +acts, and to support each other in whatever they +did: thus attempting to give their separate acts a +legal form.</p> + +<p>I have further to remark to your Lordships, what +has just been suggested to me, that it was for the express +purpose of legalizing Lord Cornwallis's delegation +that he was made commander-in-chief as well as +Governor-General by the act.</p> + +<p>The next plea urged by Mr. Hastings is conveniency. +"It was <i>convenient</i>," he says, "for me to do +this." I answer, No person acting with delegated +power can delegate that power to another. <i>Delegatus +non potest delegare</i> is a maxim of law. Much less has +he a right to supersede the law, and the principle of +his own delegation and appointment, upon any idea +of convenience. But what was the conveniency? +There was no one professed object connected with +Mr. Hastings's going up to Benares which might not +as well have been attained in Calcutta. The only +difference would have been, that in the latter case he +must have entered some part of his proceedings upon +the Consultations, whether he wished it or not. If +he had a mind to negotiate with the Vizier, he had a +resident at his court, and the Vizier had a resident +in Calcutta. The most solemn treaties had often +been made without any Governor-General carrying +up a delegation of civil and military power. If it<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_275" id="Page_275">{275}</a></span> +had been his object to break treaties, he might have +broken them at Calcutta, as he broke the treaty of +Chunar. Is there an article in that treaty that he +might not as well have made at Calcutta? Is there +an article that he broke (for he broke them all) that +he could not have broken at Calcutta? So that, +whether pledging or breaking the faith of the Company, +he might have done both or either without +ever stirring from the Presidency.</p> + +<p>I can conceive a necessity so urgent as to supersede +all laws; but I have no conception of a necessity +that can require two governors-general, each forming +separately a <i>supreme</i> council. Nay, to bring the +point home to him,—if he had a mind to make +Cheyt Sing to pay a fine, as he called it, he could +have made him do that at Calcutta as well as at +Benares. He had before contrived to make him pay +all the extra demands that were imposed upon him; +and he well knew that he could send Colonel Camac, +or somebody else, to Benares, with a body of troops +to enforce the payment. Why, then, did he go to +try experiments there in his own person? For this +plain reason: that he might be enabled to put such +sums in his own pocket as he thought fit. It was +not and could not be for any other purpose; and I +defy the wit of man to find out any other.</p> + +<p>He says, my Lords, that Cheyt Sing might have +resisted, and that, if he had not been there, the Rajah +might have fled with his money, or raised a rebellion +for the purpose of avoiding payment. Why, +then, we ask, did he not send an army? We ask, +whether Mr. Markham, with an army under the +command of Colonel Popham, or Mr. Fowke, or any +other Resident, was not much more likely to exact<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_276" id="Page_276">{276}</a></span> +a great sum of money than Mr. Hastings without +an army? My Lords, the answer must be in the affirmative; +it is therefore evident that no necessity +could exist for his presence, and that his presence +and conduct occasioned his being defeated in this +matter.</p> + +<p>We find this man, armed with an illegal commission, +undertaking an enterprise which he has since +said was perilous, which proved to be perilous, and +in which, as he has told us himself, the existence of +the British empire in India was involved. The talisman, +(your Lordships will remember his use of the +word,) that charm which kept all India in order, +which kept mighty and warlike nations under the +government of a few Englishmen, would, I verily believe, +have been broken forever, if he, or any other +Governor-General, good or bad, had been killed. Infinite +mischiefs would have followed such an event. +The situation in which he placed himself, by his own +misconduct, was pregnant with danger; and he put +himself in the way of that danger without having +any armed force worth mentioning, although he +has acknowledged that Cheyt Sing had then an immense +force. In fact, the demand of two thousand +cavalry proves that he considered the Rajah's army +to be formidable; yet, notwithstanding this, with four +companies of sepoys, poorly armed and ill provisioned, +he went to invade that fine country, and to +force from its sovereign a sum of money, the payment +of which he had reason to think would be resisted. +He thus rashly hazarded his own being and the +being of all his people.</p> + +<p>"But," says he, "I did not imagine the Rajah intended +to go into rebellion, and therefore went <span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_277" id="Page_277">{277}</a></span>unarmed." +Why, then, was his presence necessary? +Why did he not send an order from Calcutta for the +payment of the money? But what did he do, when +he got there? "I was alarmed," says he; "for the +Rajah surrounded my budgero with two thousand +men: that indicated a hostile disposition." Well, if +he did so, what precaution did Mr. Hastings take for +his own safety? Why, none, my Lords, none. He +must therefore have been either a madman, a fool, +or a determined declarer of falsehood. Either he +thought there was no danger, and therefore no occasion +for providing against it, or he was the worst +of governors, the most culpably improvident of his +personal safety, of the lives of his officers and men, +and of his country's honor.</p> + +<p>The demand of 500,000<i>l.</i> was a thing likely to +irritate the Rajah and to create resistance. In fact, +he confesses this. Mr. Markham and he had a +discourse upon that subject, and agreed to arrest +the Rajah, because they thought the enforcing this +demand might drive him to his forts, and excite a +rebellion in the country. He therefore knew there +was danger to be apprehended from this act of violence. +And yet, knowing this, he sent one unarmed +Resident to give the orders, and four unarmed companies +of sepoys to support him. He provokes the +people, he goads them with every kind of insult +added to every kind of injury, and then rushes into +the very jaws of danger, provoking a formidable foe +by the display of a puny, insignificant force.</p> + +<p>In expectation of danger, he seized the person of +the Rajah, and he pretends that the Rajah suffered +no disgrace from his arrest. But, my Lords, we +have proved, what was stated by the Rajah, and was<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_278" id="Page_278">{278}</a></span> +well known to Mr. Hastings, that to imprison a +person of elevated station, in that country, is to +subject him to the highest dishonor and disgrace, +and would make the person so imprisoned utterly +unfit to execute the functions of government ever +after.</p> + +<p>I have now to state to your Lordships a transaction +which is worse than his wantonly playing +with the safety of the Company, worse than his exacting +sums of money by fraud and violence. My +Lords, the history of this transaction must be prefaced +by describing to your Lordships the duty and +privileges attached to the office of <i>Naib</i>. A Naib +is an officer well known in India, as the administrator +of the affairs of any government, whenever +the authority of the regular holder is suspended. +But, although the Naib acts only as a deputy, yet, +when the power of the principal is totally superseded, +as by imprisonment or otherwise, and that +of the Naib is substituted, he becomes the actual +sovereign, and the principal is reduced to a mere +pensioner. I am now to show your Lordships whom +Mr. Hastings appointed as Naib to the government of +the country, after he had imprisoned the Rajah.</p> + +<p>Cheyt Sing had given him to understand through +Mr. Markham, that he was aware of the design of +suspending him, and of placing his government in +the hands of a Naib whom he greatly dreaded. This +person was called Ussaun Sing; he was a remote relation +of the family, and an object of their peculiar +suspicion and terror. The moment Cheyt Sing was +arrested, he found that his prophetic soul spoke truly; +for Mr. Hastings actually appointed this very man +to be his master. And who was this man? We are<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_279" id="Page_279">{279}</a></span> +told by Mr. Markham, in his evidence here, that he +was a man who had dishonored his family,—he +was the disgrace of his house,—that he was a +person who could not be trusted; and Mr. Hastings, +in giving Mr. Markham full power afterwards to +appoint Naibs, expressly excepted this Ussaun Sing +from all trust whatever, as a person totally unworthy +of it. Yet this Ussaun Sing, the disgrace and +calamity of his family, an incestuous adulterer, and +a supposed issue of a guilty connection, was declared +Naib. Yes, my Lords, this degraded, this +wicked and flagitious character, the Rajah's avowed +enemy, was, in order to heighten the Rajah's disgrace, +to embitter his ruin, to make destruction itself +dishonorable as well as destructive, appointed +this [his?] Naib. Thus, when Mr. Hastings had imprisoned +the Rajah, in the face of his subjects, and in +the face of all India, without fixing any term for +the duration of his imprisonment, he delivered up +the country to a man whom he knew to be utterly +undeserving, a man whom he kept in view for the +purpose of frightening the Rajah, and whom he was +obliged to depose on account of his misconduct almost +as soon as he had named him, and to exclude +specially from all kind of trust. We have heard of +much tyranny, avarice, and insult in the world; but +such an instance of tyranny, avarice, and insult combined +has never before been exhibited.</p> + +<p>We are now come to the last scene of this flagitious +transaction. When Mr. Hastings imprisoned +the Rajah, he did not renew his demand for the +500,000<i>l.</i>, but he exhibited a regular charge of various +pretended delinquencies against him, digested +into heads, and he called on him, in a dilatory, ir<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_280" id="Page_280">{280}</a></span>regular +way of proceeding, for an answer. The man, +under every difficulty and every distress, gave an +answer to every particular of the charge, as exact +and punctilious as could have been made to articles +of impeachment in this House.</p> + +<p>I must here request your Lordships to consider +the order of these proceedings. Mr. Hastings, having +determined upon the utter ruin and destruction +of this unfortunate prince, endeavored, by the arrest +of his person, by a contemptuous disregard to his +submissive applications, by the appointment of a +deputy who was personally odious to him, and by +the terror of still greater insults, he endeavored, I +say, to goad him on to the commission of some acts +of resistance sufficient to give a color of justice to +that last dreadful extremity to which he had resolved +to carry his malignant rapacity. Failing in this +wicked project, and studiously avoiding the declaration +of any terms upon which the Rajah might redeem +himself from these violent proceedings, he next +declared his intention of seizing his forts, the depository +of his victim's honor, and of the means of +his subsistence. He required him to deliver up his +accounts and accountants, together with all persons +who were acquainted with the particulars of his effects +and treasures, for the purpose of transferring +those effects to such persons as he (Mr. Hastings) +chose to nominate.</p> + +<p>It was at this crisis of aggravated insult and brutality +that the indignation which these proceedings +had occasioned in the breasts of the Rajah's subjects +burst out into an open flame. The Rajah had retired +to the last refuge of the afflicted, to offer up +prayers to his God and our God, when a vile <i>chubdar</i>,<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_281" id="Page_281">{281}</a></span> +or tipstaff, came to interrupt and insult him. His +alarmed and loyal subjects felt for a beloved sovereign +that deep interest which we should all feel, if +our sovereign were so treated. What man with a +spark of loyalty in his breast, what man regardful of +the honor of his country, when he saw his sovereign +imprisoned, and so notorious a wretch appointed his +deputy, could be a patient witness of such wrongs? +The subjects of this unfortunate prince did what we +should have done,—what all who love their country, +who love their liberty, who love their laws, who love +their property, who love their sovereign, would have +done on such an occasion. They looked upon him as +their sovereign, although degraded. They were unacquainted +with any authority superior to his, and +the phantom of tyranny which performed these oppressive +acts was unaccompanied by that force which justifies +submission by affording the plea of necessity. +An unseen tyrant and four miserable companies of +sepoys executed all the horrible things that we have +mentioned. The spirit of the Rajah's subjects was +roused by their wrongs, and encouraged by the contemptible +weakness of their oppressors. The whole +country rose up in rebellion, and surely in justifiable +rebellion. Every writer on the Law of Nations, every +man that has written, thought, or felt upon the affairs +of government, must write, know, think, and feel, +that a people so cruelly scourged and oppressed, both +in the person of their chief and in their own persons, +were justified in their resistance. They were roused +to vengeance, and a short, but most bloody war followed.</p> + +<p>We charge the prisoner at your bar with all the +consequences of this war. We charge him with the<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_282" id="Page_282">{282}</a></span> +murder of our sepoys, whom he sent unarmed to +such a dangerous enterprise. We charge him with +the blood of every man that was shed in that place; +and we call him, as we have called him, a tyrant, an +oppressor, and a murderer. We call him murderer in +the largest and fullest sense of the word; because he +was the cause of the murder of our English officers +and sepoys, whom he kept unarmed, and unacquainted +with the danger to which they would be exposed +by the violence of his transactions. He sacrificed to +his own nefarious views every one of those lives, as +well as the lives of the innocent natives of Benares, +whom he designedly drove to resistance by the weakness +of the force opposed to them, after inciting them +by tyranny and insult to that display of affection towards +their sovereign which is the duty of all good +subjects.</p> + +<p>My Lords, these are the iniquities which we have +charged upon the prisoner at your bar; and I will +next call your Lordships' attention to the manner in +which these iniquities have been pretended to be justified. +You will perceive a great difference in the +manner in which this prisoner is tried, and of which +he so much complains, and the manner in which he +dealt with the unfortunate object of his oppression. +The latter thus openly appeals to his accuser. "You +are," says he, "upon the spot. It is happy for me +that you are so. You can now inquire into my conduct." +Did Mr. Hastings so inquire? No, my +Lords, we have not a word of any inquiry; he even +found fresh matter of charge in the answer of the +Rajah, although, if there is any fault in this answer, +it is its extremely humble and submissive tone. If +there was anything faulty in his manner, it was his<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_283" id="Page_283">{283}</a></span> +extreme humility and submission. It is plain he +would have almost submitted to anything. He offered, +in fact, 220,000<i>l.</i> to redeem himself from greater +suffering. Surely no man going into rebellion +would offer 220,000<i>l.</i> of the treasure which would be +so essential to his success; nor would any government +that was really apprehensive of rebellion call +upon the suspected person to arm and discipline two +thousand horse. My Lords, it is evident no such +apprehensions were entertained; nor was any such +charge made until punishment had commenced. A +vague accusation was then brought forward, which +was answered by a clear and a natural defence, denying +some parts of the charge, evading and apologizing +for others, and desiring the whole to be inquired +into. To this request the answer of the Governor-General +was, "That won't do; you shall have no +inquiries." And why? "Because I have arbitrary +power, you have no rights, and I can and will punish +you without inquiry." I admit, that, if his will is the +law, he may take [make?] the charge before punishment +or the punishment before the charge, or he may +punish without making any charge. If his will is the +law, all I have been saying amounts to nothing. But +I have endeavored to let your Lordships see that in +no country upon the earth is the will of a despot law. +It may produce wicked, flagitious, tyrannical acts; +but in no country is it law.</p> + +<p>The duty of a sovereign in cases of rebellion, as +laid down in the Hedaya, agrees with the general +practice in India. It was usual, except in cases +of notorious injustice and oppression, whenever a +rebellion or a suspicion of a rebellion existed, to admonish +the rebellious party and persuade him to<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_284" id="Page_284">{284}</a></span> +return to his duty. Causes of complaint were removed +and misunderstandings explained, and, to save +the effusion of blood, severe measures were not adopted +until they were rendered indispensable. This wise +and provident law is or ought to be the law in all +countries: it was in fact the law in that country, +but Mr. Hastings did not attend to it. His unfortunate +victim was goaded to revolt and driven from +his subjects, although he endeavored by message after +message to reconcile this cruel tyrant to him. +He is told in reply, "You have shed the blood of +Englishmen, and I will never be reconciled to you." +Your Lordships will observe that the reason he gives +for such an infernal determination (for it cannot be +justly qualified by any other word) is of a nature +to make tyranny the very foundation of our government. +I do not say here upon what occasion +people may or may not resist; but surely, if ever +there was an occasion on which people, from love to +their sovereign and regard to their country, might +take up arms, it was this. They saw a tyrant violent +in his demands and weak in his power. They +saw their prince imprisoned and insulted, after he +had made every offer of submission, and had laid his +turban three times in the lap of his oppressor. They +saw him, instead of availing himself of the means he +possessed of cutting off his adversary, (for the life +of Mr. Hastings was entirely in his power,) betaking +himself to flight. They then thronged round him, +took up arms in his defence, and shed the blood of +some of his insulters. Is this resistance, so excited, +so provoked, a plea for irreconcilable vengeance?</p> + +<p>I must beg pardon for having omitted to lay before +your Lordships in its proper place a most extraor<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_285" id="Page_285">{285}</a></span>dinary +paper, which will show you in what manner +judicial inquiries are conducted, upon what grounds +charges are made, by what sort of evidence they are +supported, and, in short, to what perils the lives and +fortunes of men are subjected in that country. This +paper is in the printed Minutes, page 1608. It was +given in agreeably to the retrograde order which they +have established in their judicial proceedings. It was +produced to prove the truth of a charge of rebellion +which was made some months before the paper in +evidence was known to the accuser.</p> + +<div class="blockquote"> +<p class="center">"<i>To the Honorable Warren Hastings.</i></p> + +<p>"Sir,—About the month of November last, I communicated +to Mr. Markham the substance of a conversation +said to have passed between Rajah Cheyt +Sing and Saadut Ali, and which was reported to me +by a person in whom I had some confidence. The +mode of communicating this intelligence to you I +left entirely to Mr. Markham. In this conversation, +which was private, the Rajah and Saadut Ali were said +to have talked of Hyder Ali's victory over Colonel +Baillie's detachment, to have agreed that they ought +to seize this opportunity of consulting their own interest, +and to have determined to watch the success +of Hyder's arms. Some days after this conversation +was said to have happened, I was informed by the +same person that the Rajah had received a message +from one of the Begums at Fyzabad, (I think it was +from Sujah ul Dowlah's widow,) advising him not +to comply with the demands of government, and encouraging +him to expect support in case of his resisting. +This also, I believe, I communicated to Mr. +Markham; but not being perfectly certain, I now<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_286" id="Page_286">{286}</a></span> +think it my duty to remove the possibility of your +remaining unacquainted with a circumstance which +may not be unconnected with the present conduct of +the Rajah."</p> +</div> + +<p>Here, then, is evidence of evidence given to Mr. +Markham by Mr. Balfour, from Lucknow, in the month +of November, 1781, long after the transaction at Benares. +But what was this evidence? "I communicated," +he says, "the substance of a conversation said +to have passed." Observe, <i>said</i>: not a conversation +that had passed to his knowledge or recollection, but +what his informant said had passed. He adds, this +conversation was reported to him by a person whom +he won't name, but in whom, he says, he had some +confidence. This anonymous person, in whom he +had put some confidence, was not himself present at +the conversation; he only reports to him that it was +<i>said</i> by somebody else that such a conversation had +taken place. This conversation, which somebody +told Colonel Balfour he had heard was said by somebody +to have taken place, if true, related to matters +of great importance; still the mode of its communication +was left to Mr. Markham, and that gentleman +did not bring it forward till some months after. +Colonel Balfour proceeds to say,—"Some days after +this conversation was said to have happened," (your +Lordships will observe it is always, "was said to +have happened,") "I was informed by the same person +that the Rajah had received a message from one +of the Begums at Fyzabad, (I think it was from +Sujah ul Dowlah's widow,) advising him not to comply +with the demands of government, and encouraging +him to expect support in case of his resisting."<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_287" id="Page_287">{287}</a></span> +He next adds,—"This also, I believe," (observe, he +says he is not quite sure of it,) "I communicated to +Mr. Markham; but not being perfectly certain," (of +a matter the immediate knowledge of which, if true, +was of the highest importance to his country,) "I +now think it my duty to remove the possibility of +your remaining unacquainted with, a circumstance +which may not be unconnected with the present conduct +of the Rajah."</p> + +<p>Here is a man that comes with information long +after the fact deposed to, and, after having left to +another the communication of his intelligence to +the proper authority, that other neglects the matter. +No letter of Mr. Markham's appears, communicating +any such conversation to Mr. Hastings: and, indeed, +why he did not do so must appear very obvious to +your Lordships; for a more contemptible, ridiculous, +and absurd story never was invented. Does Mr. +Balfour come forward and tell him who his informant +was? No. Does he say, "He was an informant +whom I dare not name, upon account of his +great consequence, and the great confidence I had +in him"? No. He only says slightly, "I have some +confidence in him." It is upon this evidence of a +reporter of what another is <i>said</i> to have <i>said</i>, that +Mr. Hastings and his Council rely for proof, and +have thought proper to charge the Rajah, with having +conceived rebellious designs soon after the time when +Mr. Hastings had declared his belief that no such +designs had been formed.</p> + +<p>Mr. Hastings has done with his charge of rebellion +what he did with his declaration of arbitrary power: +after he had vomited it up in one place, he returns +to it in another. He here declares (after he had<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_288" id="Page_288">{288}</a></span> +recorded his belief that no rebellion was ever intended) +that Mr. Markham was in possession of information +which he might have believed, if it had been +communicated to him. Good heavens! when you review +all these circumstances, and consider the principles +upon which this man was tried and punished, +what must you think of the miserable situation of +persons of the highest rank in that country, under +the government of men who are disposed to disgrace +and ruin them in this iniquitous manner!</p> + +<p>Mr. Balfour is in Europe, I believe. How comes +it that he is not produced here to tell your Lordships +who was his informer, and what he knows of the +transaction? They have not produced him, but have +thought fit to rely upon this miserable, beggarly +semblance of evidence, the very production of which +was a crime, when brought forward for the purpose +of giving color to acts of injustice and oppression. +If you ask, Who is this Mr. Balfour? He is a person +who was a military collector of revenue in the +province of Rohilcund: a country now ruined and +desolated, but once the garden of the world. It was +from the depth of that horrible devastating system +that he gave this ridiculous, contemptible evidence, +which if it can be equalled, I shall admit that there +is not one word we have said that you ought to +attend to.</p> + +<p>Your Lordships are now enabled to sum up the +amount and estimate the result of all this iniquity. +The Rajah himself is punished, he is ruined and +undone; but the 500,000<i>l.</i> is not gained. He has +fled his country; but he carried his treasures with +him. His forts are taken possession of; but there +was nothing found in them. It is the report of<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_289" id="Page_289">{289}</a></span> +the country, and is so stated by Mr. Hastings, that +he carried away with him in gold and silver to the +value of about 400,000<i>l.</i>; and thus that sum was totally +lost, even as an object of plunder, to the Company. +The author of the mischief lost his favorite +object by his cruelty and violence. If Mr. Hastings +had listened to Cheyt Sing at first,—if he had +answered his letters, and dealt civilly with him,—if +he had endeavored afterwards to compromise matters,—if +he had <i>told</i> him what his demands were,—if, +even after the rebellion had broken out, he had +demanded and exacted a fine,—the Company would +have gained 220,000<i>l.</i> at least, and perhaps a much +larger sum, without difficulty. They would not then +have had 400,000<i>l.</i> carried out of the country by a +tributary chief, to become, as we know that sum has +become, the plunder of the Mahrattas and our other +enemies. I state to you the account of the profit +and loss of tyranny: take it as an account of profit +and loss; forget the morality, forget the law, forget +the policy; take it, I say, as a matter of profit and +loss. Mr. Hastings lost the subsidy; Mr. Hastings +lost the 220,000<i>l.</i> which was offered him, and more +that he might have got. Mr. Hastings lost it all; +and the Company lost the 400,000<i>l.</i> which he meant +to exact. It was carried from the British dominions +to enrich its enemies forever.</p> + +<p>This man, my Lords, has not only acted thus vindictively +himself, but he has avowed the principle of +revenge as a general rule of policy, connected with +the security of the British government in India. He +has dared to declare, that, if a native once draws his +sword, he is not to be pardoned; that you never are +to forgive any man who has killed an English soldier.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_290" id="Page_290">{290}</a></span> +You are to be implacable and resentful; and there +is no maxim of tyrants, which, upon account of the +supposed weakness of your government, you are not +to pursue. Was this the conduct of the Mogul conquerors +of India? and must this <i>necessarily</i> be the +policy of their Christian successors? I pledge myself, +if called upon, to prove the contrary. I pledge +myself to produce, in the history of the Mogul empire, +a series of pardons and amnesties for rebellions, +from its earliest establishments, and in its most distant +provinces.</p> + +<p>I need not state to your Lordships what you know +to be the true principles of British policy in matters +of this nature. When there has been provocation, +you ought to be ready to listen to terms of reconciliation, +even after war has been made. This you +ought to do, to show that you are placable; such policy +as this would doubtless be of the greatest benefit +and advantage to you. Look to the case of Sujah +Dowlah. You had, in the course of a war with him, +driven him from his country; you had not left him +in possession of a foot of earth in the world. The +Mogul was his sovereign, and, by his authority, it +was in your power to dispose of the vizierate, and +of every office of state which Sujah Dowlah held +under the emperor: for he hated him mortally, and +was desirous of dispossessing him of everything. +What did you do? Though he had shed much English +blood, you reëstablished him in all his power, +you gave him more than he before possessed; and +you had no reason to repent your generosity. Your +magnanimity and justice proved to be the best policy, +and was the subject of admiration from one end +of India to the other. But Mr. Hastings had other<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_291" id="Page_291">{291}</a></span> +maxims and other principles. You are weak, he +says, and therefore you ought never to forgive. +Indeed, Mr. Hastings never does forgive. The Rajah +was weak, and he persecuted him; Mr. Hastings +was weak, and he lost his prey. He went up the +country with the rapacity, but not with the talons +and beak, of a vulture. He went to look for plunder; +but he was himself plundered, the country was +ravaged, and the prey escaped.</p> + +<p>After the escape of Cheyt Sing, there still existed +in one corner of the country some further food for +Mr. Hastings's rapacity. There was a place called +Bidjegur, one of those forts which Mr. Hastings declared +could not be safely left in the possession of the +Rajah; measures were therefore taken to obtain possession +of this place, soon after the flight of its unfortunate +proprietor. And what did he find in it? A +great and powerful garrison? No, my Lords: he +found in it the wives and family of the Rajah; he +found it inhabited by two hundred women, and defended +by a garrison of eunuchs and a few feeble +militia-men. This fortress was supposed by him +to contain some money, which he hoped to lay hold +of when all other means of rapacity had escaped him. +He first sends (and you have it on your minutes) a +most cruel, most atrocious, and most insulting message +to these unfortunate women; one of whom, a +principal personage of the family, we find him in the +subsequent negotiation scandalizing in one minute, +and declaring to be a woman of respectable character +in the next,—treating her by turns as a prostitute +and as an amiable woman, as best suited the purposes +of the hour. This woman, with two hundred +of her sex, he found in Bidjegur. Whatever money<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_292" id="Page_292">{292}</a></span> +they had was their own property; and as such Cheyt +Sing, who had visited the place before his flight, had +left it for their support, thinking that it would be +secure to them as their property, because they were +persons wholly void of guilt, as they must needs have +been. This money the Rajah might have carried off +with him; but he left it them, and we must presume +that it was their property; and no attempt was ever +made by Mr. Hastings to prove otherwise. They had +no other property that could be found. It was the +only means of subsistence for themselves, their children, +their domestics, and dependants, and for the +whole female part of that once illustrious and next +to royal family.</p> + +<p>But to proceed. A detachment of soldiers was sent +to seize the forts [fort?]. Soldiers are habitually +men of some generosity; even when they are acting +in a bad cause, they do not wholly lose the military +spirit. But Mr. Hastings, fearing that they might +not be animated with the same lust of plunder as +himself, stimulated them to demand the plunder of +the place, and expresses his hopes that no composition +would be made with these women, and that not +one shilling of the booty would be allowed them. He +does not trust to their acting as soldiers who have +their fortunes to make; but he stimulates and urges +them not to give way to the generous passions and +feelings of men.</p> + +<p>He thus writes from Benares, the 22d of October, +1781, ten o'clock in the morning. "I am this instant +favored with yours of yesterday; mine to you +of the same date has before this time acquainted you +with my resolutions and sentiments respecting the +Ranny. I think every demand she has made to you,<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_293" id="Page_293">{293}</a></span> +except that of safety and respect for her person, is +unreasonable. If the reports brought to me are +true, your rejecting her offers, or any negotiation +with her, would soon obtain you possession of the fort +upon your own terms. I apprehend that she will +contrive to defraud the captors of a considerable +part of the booty by being suffered to retire without +examination; but this is your consideration, and not +mine. I should be sorry that your officers and soldiers +lost any part of the reward to which they are so +well entitled; but I cannot make any objection, as +you must be the best judge of the expediency of the +promised indulgence to the Ranny. What you have +engaged for I will certainly ratify; but as to permitting +the Ranny to hold the purgunnah of Hurluk, +or any other in the zemindary, without being subject +to the authority of the zemindar, or any lands whatever, +or indeed making any conditions with her for a +provision, I will never consent to it."</p> + +<p>My Lords, you have seen the principles upon +which this man justifies his conduct. Here his real +nature, character, and disposition break out. These +women had been guilty of no rebellion; he never +charged them with any crime but that of having +wealth; and yet you see with what ferocity he pursues +everything that belonged to the destined object +of his cruel, inhuman, and more than tragic revenge. +"If," says he, "you have made an agreement with +them, and will insist upon it, I will keep it; but if +you have not, I beseech you not to make any. Don't +give them anything; suffer no stipulations whatever +of a provision for them. The capitulation I will ratify, +provided it contains no article of future provision +for them." This he positively forbade; so that his<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_294" id="Page_294">{294}</a></span> +bloodthirsty vengeance would have sent out these +two hundred innocent women to starve naked in the +world.</p> + +<p>But he not only declares that the money found +in the fort is the soldiers', he adds, that he should +be sorry, if they lost a shilling of it. So that you +have here a man not only declaring that the money +was theirs, directly contrary to the Company's positive +orders upon other similar occasions, and after +he had himself declared that prize-money was poison +to soldiers, but directly inciting them to insist +upon their right to it.</p> + +<p>A month had been allowed by proclamation for +the submission of all persons who had been in rebellion, +which submission was to entitle them to +indemnity. But, my Lords, he endeavored to break +the public faith with these women, by inciting the +soldiers to make no capitulation with them, and thus +depriving them of the benefit of the proclamation, by +preventing their voluntary surrender.</p> + +<div class="blockquote"><p class="center">[<i>Mr. Burke here read the proclamation.</i>]</p></div> + +<p>From the date of this proclamation it appears that +the surrender of the fort was clearly within the time +given to those who had been guilty of the most +atrocious acts of rebellion to repair to their homes +and enjoy an indemnity. These women had never +quitted their homes, nor had they been charged with +rebellion, and yet they were cruelly excluded from +the general indemnity; and after the army had taken +unconditional possession of the fort, they were turned +out of it, and ordered to the quarters of the commanding +officer, Major Popham. This officer had +received from Mr. Hastings a power to rob them, a<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_295" id="Page_295">{295}</a></span> +power to plunder them, a power to distribute the +plunder, but no power to give them any allowance, +nor any authority even to receive them.</p> + +<p>In this disgraceful affair the soldiers showed a +generosity which Mr. Hastings neither showed nor +would have suffered, if he could have prevented it. +They agreed amongst themselves to give to these +women three lacs of rupees, and some trifle more; +and the rest was divided as a prey among the army. +The sum found in the fort was about 238,000<i>l.</i>, not +the smallest part of which was in any way proved +to be Cheyt Sing's property, or the property of any +person but the unfortunate women who were found +in the possession of it.</p> + +<p>The plunder of the fort being thus given to the +soldiers, what does Mr. Hastings next do? He is +astonished and stupefied to find so much unprofitable +violence, so much tyranny, and so little pecuniary +advantage,—so much bloodshed, without any +profit to the Company. He therefore breaks his +faith with the soldiers; declares, that, having no +right to the money, they must refund it to the Company; +and on their refusal, he instituted a suit +against them. With respect to the three lacs of +rupees, or 30,000<i>l.</i>, which was to be given to these +women, have we a scrap of paper to prove its payment? +is there a single receipt or voucher to verify +their having received one sixpence of it? I am +rather inclined to think that they did receive it, or +some part of it; but I don't know a greater crime +in public officers than to have no kind of vouchers +for the disposal of any large sums of money which +pass through their hands: but this, my Lords, is +the great vice of Mr. Hastings's government.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_296" id="Page_296">{296}</a></span></p> + +<p>I have briefly taken notice of the claim which Mr. +Hastings thought proper to make, on the part of +the Company, to the treasure found in the fort of +Bidjegur, after he had instigated the army to claim +it as the right of the captors. Your Lordships will +not be at a loss to account for this strange and barefaced +inconsistency. This excellent Governor foresaw +that he would have a bad account of this business +to give to the contractors in Leadenhall Street, +who consider laws, religion, morality, and the principles +of state policy of empires as mere questions +of profit and loss. Finding that he had dismal accounts +to give of great sums expended without any +returns, he had recourse to the only expedient that +was left him. He had broken his faith with the +ladies in the fort, by not suffering his officers to +grant them that indemnity which his proclamation +offered. Then, finding that the soldiers had taken +him at his word, and appropriated the treasure to +their own use, he next broke his faith with them. +A constant breach of faith is a maxim with him. +He claims the treasure for the Company, and institutes +a suit before Sir Elijah Impey, who gives the +money to the Company, and not to the soldiers. +The soldiers appeal; and since the beginning of this +trial, I believe even very lately, it has been decided +by the Council that the letter of Mr. Hastings was +not, as Sir Elijah Impey pretended, a mere private +letter, because it had "Dear Sir," in it, but a public +order, authorizing the soldiers to divide the money +among themselves.</p> + +<p>Thus 200,000<i>l.</i> was distributed among the soldiers; +400,000<i>l.</i> was taken away by Cheyt Sing, to +be pillaged by all the Company's enemies through<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_297" id="Page_297">{297}</a></span> +whose countries he passed; and so ended one of +the great sources from which this great financier +intended to supply the exigencies of the Company, +and recruit their exhausted finances.</p> + +<p>By this proceeding, my Lords, the national honor +is disgraced, all the rules of justice are violated, and +every sanction, human and divine, trampled upon. +We have, on one side, a country ruined, a noble +family destroyed, a rebellion raised by outrage and +quelled by bloodshed, the national faith pledged to +indemnity, and that indemnity faithlessly withheld +from helpless, defenceless women; while the other +side of the picture is equally unfavorable. The East +India Company have had their treasure wasted, their +credit weakened, their honor polluted, and their +troops employed against their own subjects, when +their services were required against foreign enemies.</p> + +<p>My Lords, it only remains for me, at this time, to +make a few observations upon some proceedings of +the prisoner respecting the revenue of Benares. I +must first state to your Lordships that in the year +1780 he made a demand upon that country, which, +by his own account, if it had been complied with, +would only have left 23,000<i>l.</i> a year for the maintenance +of the Rajah and his family. I wish to +have this account read, for the purpose of verifying +the observations which I shall have to make to your +Lordships.</p> + +<div class="blockquote"><p class="center">[<i>Here the account was read.</i>]</p></div> + +<p>I must now observe to your Lordships, that Mr. +Markham and Mr. Hastings have stated the Rajah's +net revenue at forty-six lacs: but the accounts before +you state it at forty lacs only. Mr. Hastings<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_298" id="Page_298">{298}</a></span> +had himself declared that he did not think the country +could safely yield more, and that any attempt +to extract more would be ruinous.</p> + +<p>Your Lordships will observe that the first of these +estimates is unaccompanied with any document whatever, +and that it is contradicted by the papers of receipt +and the articles of account, from all of which +it appears that the country never yielded more than +forty lacs during the time that Mr. Hastings had +it in his possession; and you may be sure he +squeezed as much out of it as he could. He had +his own Residents,—first Mr. Markham, then Mr. +Fowke, then Mr. Grant; they all went up with a +design to make the most of it. They endeavored +to do so; but they never could screw it up to more +than forty lacs by all the violent means which they +employed. The ordinary subsidy, as paid at Calcutta +by the Rajah, amounted to twenty-two lacs; +and it is therefore clearly proved by this paper, +that Mr. Hastings's demand of fifty lacs (500,000<i>l.</i>), +joined to the subsidies, was more than the whole +revenue which the country could yield. What +hoarded treasure the Rajah possessed, and which +Mr. Hastings says he carried off with him, does +not appear. That it was any considerable sum is +more than Mr. Hastings knows, more than can be +proved, more than is probable. He had not, in +his precipitate flight, any means, I think, of carrying +away a great sum. It further appears from +these accounts, that, after the payment of the subsidy, +there would only have been left 18,000<i>l.</i> a year +for the support of the Rajah's family and establishments.</p> + +<p>Your Lordships have now a standard, not a vision<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_299" id="Page_299">{299}</a></span>ary +one, but a standard verified by accurate calculation +and authentic accounts. You may now fairly estimate +the avarice and rapacity of this man, who describes +countries to be enormously rich in order that +he may be justified in pillaging them. But however +insatiable the prisoner's avarice may be, he has other +objects in view, other passions rankling in his heart, +besides the lust of money. He was not ignorant, and +we have proved it by his own confession, that his pretended +expectation of benefit to the Company could +not be realized; but he well knew that by enforcing +his demands he should utterly and effectually ruin a +man whom he mortally hated and abhorred,—a man +who could not, by any sacrifices offered to the avarice, +avert the cruelty of his implacable enemy. As +long as truth remains, as long as figures stand, +as long as two and two are four, as long as there +is mathematical and arithmetical demonstration, so +long shall his cruelty, rage, ravage, and oppression +remain evident to an astonished posterity.</p> + +<p>I shall undertake, my Lords, when this court meets +again, to develop the consequences of this wicked proceeding. +I shall then show you that that part of +the Rajah's family which he left behind him, and +which Mr. Hastings pretended to take under his protection, +was also ruined, undone, and destroyed; and +that the once beautiful country of Benares, which he +has had the impudence to represent as being still +in a prosperous condition, was left by him in such +a state as would move pity in any tyrant in the +world except the one who now stands before you.</p> + +<div class="footnotes"><h3>FOOTNOTES:</h3> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_98_98" id="Footnote_98_98"></a><a href="#FNanchor_98_98"><span class="label">[98]</span></a> Hedaya, Vol. II. p. 621.</p></div> +</div> + +<p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_300" id="Page_300">{300}</a></span></p> +<hr style="width: 65%;" /> +<h2><a name="THIRD_DAY_TUESDAY_JUNE_3_1794" id="THIRD_DAY_TUESDAY_JUNE_3_1794"></a>SPEECH<br /> +<br /> +<span style="font-size: 50%;">IN</span><br /> +<br /> +GENERAL REPLY.<br /> +<br /> +<span style="font-size: 50%;">THIRD DAY: TUESDAY, JUNE 3, 1794.</span></h2> + + +<p>My Lords,—We are called, with an awful +voice, to come forth and make good our charge +against the prisoner at your bar; but as a long time +has elapsed since your Lordships heard that charge, I +shall take the liberty of requesting my worthy fellow +Manager near me to read that part to your Lordships +which I am just now going to observe upon, that you +may be the better able to apply my observations to the +letter of the charge.</p> + +<div class="blockquote"><p class="center">[<i>Mr. Wyndham reads.</i>]</p></div> + +<p>"That the said Warren Hastings, having, as aforesaid, +expelled the said Cheyt Sing from his dominions, +did, of his own usurped authority, and without any +communication with or any approbation given by the +other members of the Council, nominate and appoint +Rajah Mehip Narrain to the government of the provinces +of Benares, and did appoint his father, Durbege +Sing, as administrator of his authority, and did give +to the British Resident, William Markham, a controlling +authority over both; and did farther abrogate and +set aside all treaties and agreements which subsisted +between the state of Benares and the British nation; +and did arbitrarily and tyrannically, of his mere au<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_301" id="Page_301">{301}</a></span>thority, +raise the tribute to the sum of four hundred +thousand pounds sterling, or thereabouts; did +further wantonly and illegally impose certain oppressive +duties upon goods and merchandise, to the great +injury of trade and ruin of the provinces; and did farther +dispose of, as his own, the property within the +said provinces, by granting the same, or parts, thereof, +in pensions to such persons as he thought fit.</p> + +<p>"That the said Warren Hastings did, some time in +the year 1782, enter into a clandestine correspondence +with William Markham, Esquire, the then Resident +at Benares, which said Markham had been by him, +the said Warren Hastings, obtruded into the said office, +contrary to the positive orders of the Court of +Directors; and, in consequence of the representations +of the said Markham, did, under pretence that the +new excessive rent or tribute was in arrear, and that +the affairs of the provinces were likely to fall into +confusion, authorize and impower him, by his own +private authority, to remove the said Durbege Sing +from his office and deprive him of his estate.</p> + +<p>"That the said Durbege Sing was, by the private +orders and authorities given by the said Warren +Hastings, and in consequence of the representations +aforesaid, violently thrown into prison, and cruelly +confined therein, under pretence of the non-payment +of the arrears of the tribute aforesaid.</p> + +<p>"That the widow of Bulwant Sing, and the Rajah +Mehip Narrain, did pointedly accuse the said Markham +of being the sole cause of any delay in the payment +of the tribute aforesaid, and did offer to prove the +innocence of the said Durbege Sing, and also to prove +that the faults ascribed to him were solely the faults +of the said Markham; yet the said Warren Hastings<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_302" id="Page_302">{302}</a></span> +did pay no regard whatever to the said representations, +nor make any inquiry into the truth of the same, but +did accuse the said widow of Bulwant Sing and the +Rajah aforesaid of gross presumption for the same; +and, listening to the representations of the person accused, +(viz., the Resident Markham,) did continue +to confine the said Durbege Sing in prison, and did +invest the Resident Markham with authority to bestow +his office upon whomsoever he pleased.</p> + +<p>"That the said Markham did bestow the said office +of administrator of the provinces of Benares upon a +certain person named Jagher Deo Seo, who, in order +to gratify the arbitrary demands of the said Warren +Hastings, was obliged greatly to distress and harass +the unfortunate inhabitants of the said provinces.</p> + +<p>"That the said Warren Hastings did, some time in +the year 1784, remove the said Jagher Deo Seo from +the said office, under pretence of certain irregularities +and oppressions; which irregularities and oppressions +are solely imputable to him, the said Warren Hastings.</p> + +<p>"That the consequences of all these violent changes +and arbitrary acts were the total ruin and desolation +of the country, and the flight of the inhabitants: the +said Warren Hastings having found every place abandoned +at his approach, even by the officers of the very +government which he established, and seeing nothing +but traces of devastation in every village, the provinces +in effect without a government, the administration +misconducted, the people oppressed, trade discouraged, +and the revenue in danger of a rapid decline.</p> + +<p>"All which destruction, devastation, oppression, +and ruin are solely imputable to the abovementioned +and other arbitrary, illegal, unjust, and tyrannical +acts of him, the said Warren Hastings, who, by all<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_303" id="Page_303">{303}</a></span> +and every one of the same, was and is guilty of high +crimes and misdemeanors."</p> + +<div class="blockquot"><p class="center">[<i>Mr. Burke proceeded.</i>]</p></div> + +<p>My Lords, you have heard the charge; and you are +now going to see the prisoner at your bar in a new +point of view. I will now endeavor to display him in +his character of a legislator in a foreign land, not +augmenting the territory, honor, and power of Great +Britain, and bringing the acquisition under the dominion +of law and liberty, but desolating a flourishing +country, that to all intents and purposes was our +own,—a country which we had conquered from freedom, +from tranquillity, order, and prosperity, and submitted, +through him, to arbitrary power, misrule, anarchy, +and ruin. We now see the object of his corrupt +vengeance utterly destroyed, his family driven +from their home, his people butchered, his wife and +all the females of his family robbed and dishonored +in their persons, and the effects which husband and +parents had laid up in store for the subsistence of +their families, all the savings of provident economy, +distributed amongst a rapacious soldiery. His malice +is victorious. He has well avenged, in the destruction +of this unfortunate family, the Rajah's intended +visit to General Clavering; he has well avenged the +suspected discovery of his bribe to Mr. Francis.</p> + +<div class="poem"><div class="stanza"> +<span class="i0">"Thou hast it now, King, Cawdor, Glamis, all!"<br /></span> +</div></div> + +<p>Let us see, my Lords, what use he makes of this +power,—how he justifies the bounty of Fortune, +bestowing on him this strange and anomalous conquest. +Anomalous I call it, my Lords, because it +was the result of no plan in the cabinet, no opera<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_304" id="Page_304">{304}</a></span>tion +in the field. No act or direction proceeded from +him, the responsible chief, except the merciless orders, +and the grant to the soldiery. He lay skulking and +trembling in the fort of Chunar, while the British +soldiery entitled themselves to the plunder which he +held out to them. Nevertheless, my Lords, he conquers; +the country is his own; he treats it as his +own. Let us, therefore, see how this successor of +Tamerlane, this emulator of Genghis Khân, governs +a country conquered by the talents and courage of +others, without assistance, guide, direction, or counsel +given by himself.</p> + +<p>My Lords, I will introduce his first act to your +Lordships' notice in the words of the charge.</p> + +<p>"The said Warren Hastings did, some time in the +year 1782, enter into a clandestine correspondence +with William Markham, Esquire, the then Resident +at Benares; which said Markham had been by him, +the said Warren Hastings, obtruded into the said office, +contrary to the positive orders of the Court of +Directors."</p> + +<p>This unjustifiable obtrusion, this illegal appointment, +shows you at the very outset that he defies the +laws of his country,—most positively and pointedly +defies them. In attempting to give a reason for this +defiance, he has chosen to tell a branch of the legislature +from which originated the act which wisely and +prudently ordered him to pay implicit obedience to +the Court of Directors, that he removed Mr. Fowke +from Benares, contrary to the orders of the Court, +on political grounds; because, says he, "I thought it +necessary the Resident there should be a man of my +own nomination and confidence. I avow the principle, +and think no government can subsist without it.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_305" id="Page_305">{305}</a></span> +The punishment of the Rajah made no part of my +design in Mr. Fowke's removal or Mr. Markham's +appointment, nor was his punishment an object of my +contemplation at the time I removed Mr. Fowke to +appoint Mr. Markham: an appointment of my own +choice, and a signal to notify the restoration of my +own authority; as I had before removed Mr. Fowke +and appointed Mr. Graham for the same purpose."</p> + +<p>Here, my Lords, he does not even pretend that he +had any view whatever, in this appointment of Mr. +Markham, but to defy the laws of his country. "I +must," says he, "have a man of my own nomination, +because it is a signal to notify the restoration of my +own authority, as I had before removed Mr. Fowke +for the same purpose."</p> + +<p>I must beg your Lordships to keep in mind that +the greater part of the observations with which I shall +trouble you have a reference to the <i>principles</i> upon +which this man acts; and I beseech you to remember +always that you have before you a question and an +issue of law; I beseech you to consider what it is that +you are disposing of,—that you are not merely disposing +of this man and his cause, but that you are +disposing of the laws of your country.</p> + +<p>You, my Lords, have made, and we have made, an +act of Parliament in which the Council at Calcutta +is vested with a special power, distinctly limited and +defined. He says, "My authority is absolute. I defy +the orders of the Court of Directors, because it is +necessary for me to show that I can disregard them, +as a signal of my own authority." He supposes his +authority gone while he obeys the laws; but, says he, +"the moment I got rid of the bonds and barriers of +the laws," (as if there had been some act of violence<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_306" id="Page_306">{306}</a></span> +and usurpation that had deprived him of his rightful +powers,) "I was restored to my own authority." +What is this authority to which he is restored? Not +an authority vested in him by the East India Company; +not an authority sanctioned by the laws of +this kingdom. It is neither of these, but the authority +of Warren Hastings; an inherent divine right, I +suppose, which he has thought proper to claim as +belonging to himself; something independent of the +laws, something independent of the Court of Directors, +something independent of his brethren of the +Council. It is "my own authority."</p> + +<p>And what is the signal by which you are to know +when this authority is restored? By his obedience +to the Court of Directors?—by his attention to the +laws of his country?—by his regard to the rights of +the people? No, my Lords, no: the notification of +the restoration of this authority is a formal disobedience +of the orders of the Court of Directors. When +you find the laws of the land trampled upon, and +their appointed authority despised, then you may be +sure that the authority of the prisoner is reëstablished.</p> + +<p>There is, my Lords, always a close connection between +vices of every description. The man who is a +tyrant would, under some other circumstances, be a +rebel; and he that is a rebel would become a tyrant. +They are things which originally proceed from the +same source. They owe their birth to the wild, unbridled +lewdness of arbitrary power. They arise from +a contempt of public order, and of the laws and institutions +which curb mankind. They arise from a +harsh, cruel, and ferocious disposition, impatient of +the rules of law, order, and morality: and accord<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_307" id="Page_307">{307}</a></span>ingly, +as their relation varies, the man is a tyrant, +if a superior, a rebel, if an inferior. But this man, +standing in a middle point between the two relations, +the superior and inferior, declares himself at once +both a rebel and a tyrant. We therefore naturally +expect, that, when he has thrown off the laws of his +country, he will throw off all other authority. Accordingly, +in defiance of that authority to which he +owes his situation, he nominates Mr. Markham to the +Residency at Benares, and therefore every act of Mr. +Markham is his. He is responsible,—doubly responsible +to what he would have been, if in the ordinary +course of office he had named this agent. Every +governor is responsible for the misdemeanors committed +under his legal authority for which he does +not punish the delinquent; but the prisoner is doubly +responsible in this case, because he assumed an +illegal authority, which can be justified only, if at all, +by the good resulting from the assumption.</p> + +<p>Having now chosen his principal instrument and +his confidential and sole counsellor, having the country +entirely in his hand, and every obstacle that +could impede his course swept out of the arena, what +does he do under these auspicious circumstances? +You would imagine, that, in the first place, he would +have sent down to the Council at Calcutta a general +view of his proceedings, and of their consequences, +together with a complete statement of the revenue; +that he would have recommended the fittest persons +for public trusts, with such other measures as he +might judge to be most essential to the interest and +honor of his employers. One would have imagined +he would have done this, in order that the Council +and the Court of Directors might have a clear view<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_308" id="Page_308">{308}</a></span> +of the whole existing system, before he attempted to +make a permanent arrangement for the administration +of the country. But, on the contrary, the whole +of his proceedings is clandestinely conducted; there +is not the slightest communication with the Council +upon the business, till he had determined and settled +the whole. Thus the Council was placed in a +complete dilemma,—either to confirm all his wicked +and arbitrary acts, (for such we have proved them to +be,) or to derange the whole administration of the +country again, and to make another revolution as +complete and dreadful as that which he had made.</p> + +<p>The task which the Governor-General had imposed +upon himself was, I admit, a difficult one; but those +who pull down important ancient establishments, +who wantonly destroy modes of administration and +public institutions under which a country has prospered, +are the most mischievous, and therefore the +wickedest of men. It is not a reverse of fortune, it +is not the fall of an individual, that we are here +talking of. We are, indeed, sorry for Cheyt Sing +and Durbege Sing, as we should be sorry for any +individual under similar circumstances.</p> + +<p>It is wisely provided in the constitution of our +heart, that we should interest ourselves in the fate +of great personages. They are therefore made everywhere +the objects of tragedy, which addresses +itself directly to our passions and our feelings. And +why? Because men of great place, men of great +rank, men of great hereditary authority, cannot fall +without a horrible crash upon all about them. Such +towers cannot tumble without ruining their dependent +cottages.</p> + +<p>The prosperity of a country, that has been dis<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_309" id="Page_309">{309}</a></span>tressed +by a revolution which has swept off its principal +men, cannot be reëstablished without extreme +difficulty. This man, therefore, who wantonly and +wickedly destroyed the existing government of Benares, +was doubly bound to use all possible care and +caution in supplying the loss of those institutions +which he had destroyed, and of the men whom he +had driven into exile. This, I say, he ought to have +done. Let us now see what he really did do.</p> + +<p>He set out by disposing of all the property of the +country as if it was his own. He first confiscated +the whole estates of the <i>Baboos</i>, the great nobility +of the country, to the amount of six lacs of rupees. +He then distributed the lands and revenue of the +country according to his own pleasure; and as he +had seized the lands without our knowing why or +wherefore, so the portion which he took away from +some persons he gave to others, in the same arbitrary +manner, and without any assignable reason.</p> + +<p>When we were inquiring what jaghires Mr. Hastings +had thought proper to grant, we found, to our +astonishment, (though it is natural that his mind +should take this turn,) that he endowed several +charities with jaghires. He gave a jaghire to some +Brahmins to pray for the perpetual prosperity of the +Company, and others to procure the prayers of the +same class of men for himself. I do not blame his +Gentoo piety, when I find no Christian piety in the +man: let him take refuge in any superstition he +pleases. The crime we charge is his having distributed +the lands of others at his own pleasure. +Whether this proceeded from piety, from ostentation, +or from any other motive, it matters not. We contend +that he ought not to have distributed such land<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_310" id="Page_310">{310}</a></span> +at all,—that he had no right to do so; and consequently, +the gift of a single acre of land, by his own +private will, was an act of robbery, either from the +public or some individual.</p> + +<p>When he had thus disturbed the landed property +of Benares, and distributed it according to his own +will, he thought it would be proper to fix upon a +person to govern the country; and of this person he +himself made the choice. It does not appear that +the people could have lost, even by the revolt of +Cheyt Sing, the right which was inherent in them to +be governed by the lawful successor of his family. +We find, however, that this man, by his own authority, +by the arbitrary exercise of his own will and fancy, +did think proper to nominate a person to succeed +the Rajah who had no legal claims to the succession. +He made choice of a boy about nineteen years old; +and he says he made that choice upon the principle +of this boy's being descended from Bulwant Sing +by the female line. But he does not pretend to say +that he was the proper and natural heir to Cheyt +Sing; and we will show you the direct contrary. Indeed, +he confesses the contrary himself; for he argues, +in his defence, that, when a new system was to +be formed with the successor of Cheyt Sing who was +not his heir, such successor had no claim of right.</p> + +<p>But perhaps the want of right was supplied by the +capacity and fitness of the person who was chosen. +I do not say that this does or can for one moment +supersede the positive right of another person; but +it would palliate the injustice in some degree. Was +there in this case any palliative matter? Who was +the person chosen by Mr. Hastings to succeed Cheyt +Sing? My Lords, the person chosen was a minor:<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_311" id="Page_311">{311}</a></span> +for we find the prisoner at your bar immediately proceeded +to appoint him a guardian. This guardian +he also chose by his own will and pleasure, as he +himself declares, without referring to any particular +claim or usage,—without calling the Pundits to instruct +him, upon whom, by the Gentoo laws, the +guardianship devolved.</p> + +<p>I admit, that, in selecting a guardian, he did not, +in one respect, act improperly; for he chose the +boy's father, and he could not have chosen a better +guardian for his person. But for the administration +of his government qualities were required which this +man did not possess. He should have chosen a man +of vigor, capacity, and diligence, a man fit to meet +the great difficulties of the situation in which he was +to be placed.</p> + +<p>Mr. Hastings, my Lords, plainly tells you that he +did not think the man's talents to be extraordinary, +and he soon afterwards says that he had a great +many incapacities. He tells you that he has a doubt +whether he was capable of realizing those hopes of +revenue which he (Mr. Hastings) had formed. Nor +can this be matter of wonder, when we consider that +he had ruined and destroyed the ancient system, the +whole scheme and tenor of public offices, and had +substituted nothing for them but his own arbitrary +will. He had formed a plan of an entire new system, +in which the practical details had no reference +to the experience and wisdom of past ages. He did +not take the government as he found it; he did not +take the system of offices as it was arranged to his +hand; but he dared to make the wicked and flagitious +experiment which I have stated,—an experiment +upon the happiness of a numerous people,<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_312" id="Page_312">{312}</a></span> +whose property he had usurped and distributed in +the manner which has been laid before your Lordships. +The attempt failed, and he is responsible for +the consequences.</p> + +<p>How dared he to make these experiments? In +what manner can he be justified for playing fast and +loose with the dearest interests, and perhaps with +the very existence, of a nation? Attend to the +manner in which he justifies himself, and you will +find the whole secret let out. "The easy accumulation +of too much wealth," he says, "had been +Cheyt Sing's ruin; it had buoyed him up with extravagant +and ill-founded notions of independence, +which I very much wished to discourage in the future +Rajah. Some part, therefore, of the superabundant +produce in the country I turned into the +coffers of the sovereign by an augmentation of the +tribute."—Who authorized him to make any augmentation +of the tribute? But above all, who authorized +him to augment it upon this principle?—"I +must take care the tributary prince does not grow +too rich; if he gets rich, he will get proud."—This +prisoner has got a scale like that in the almanac,—"War +begets poverty, poverty peace," and so on. +The first rule that he lays down is, that he will keep +the new Rajah in a state of poverty; because, if he +grows rich, he will become proud, and behave as +Cheyt Sing did. You see the ground, foundation, +and spirit of the whole proceeding. Cheyt Sing was +to be robbed. Why? Because he is too rich. His +successor is to be reduced to a miserable condition. +Why? Lest he should grow rich and become troublesome. +The whole of his system is to prevent men +from growing rich, lest, if they should grow rich, they<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_313" id="Page_313">{313}</a></span> +should grow proud, and seek independence. Your +Lordships see that in this man's opinion riches must +beget pride. I hope your Lordships will never be +so poor as to cease to be proud; for, ceasing to be +proud, you will cease to be independent.</p> + +<p>Having resolved that the Rajah should not grow +rich, for fear he should grow proud and independent, +he orders him to pay forty lacs of rupees, or 400,000<i>l.</i>, +annually to the Company. The tribute had before +been 250,000<i>l.</i>, and he all at once raised it to +400,000<i>l.</i> Did he previously inform the Council +of these intentions? Did he inform them of the +amount of the gross collections of the country, from +any properly authenticated accounts procured from +any public office?</p> + +<p>I need not inform your Lordships, that it is a +serious thing to draw out of a country, instead of +250,000<i>l.</i>, an annual tribute of 400,000<i>l.</i> There +were other persons besides the Rajah concerned in +this enormous increase of revenue. The whole country +is interested in its resources being fairly estimated +and assessed; for, if you overrate the revenue which +it is supposed to yield to the great general collector, +you necessitate him to overrate every under-collector, +and thereby instigate them to harass and oppress +the people. It is upon these grounds that we have +charged the prisoner at your bar with having acted +arbitrarily, illegally, unjustly, and tyrannically: and +your Lordships will bear in mind that these acts were +done by his sole authority, which authority we have +shown to have been illegally assumed.</p> + +<p>My Lords, before he took the important steps which +I have just stated, he consulted no one but Mr. Markham, +whom he placed over the new Rajah. The<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_314" id="Page_314">{314}</a></span> +Rajah was only nineteen years old: but Mr. Markham +undoubtedly had the advantage of him in this +respect, for he was twenty-one. He had also the +benefit of five months' experience of the country: +an abundant experience, to be sure, my Lords, in a +country where it is well known, from the peculiar +character of its inhabitants, that a man cannot anywhere +put his foot without placing it upon some trap +or mine, until he is perfectly acquainted with its localities. +Nevertheless, he puts the whole country and a +prince of nineteen, as appears from the evidence, into +the hands of Mr. Markham, a man of twenty-one. +We have no doubt of Mr. Markham's capacity; but +he could have no experience in a country over which +he possessed a general controlling power. Under +these circumstances, we surely shall not wonder, if +this young man fell into error. I do not like to treat +harshly the errors into which a very young person +may fall: but the man who employs him, and puts +him into a situation for which he has neither capacity +nor experience, is responsible for the consequences +of such an appointment; and Mr. Hastings is doubly +responsible in this case, because he placed Mr. Markham +as Resident merely to show that he defied the +authority of the Court of Directors.</p> + +<p>But, my Lords, let us proceed. We find Mr. +Hastings resolved to exact forty lacs from the country, +although he had no proof that such a tribute +could be fairly collected. He next assigns to this +boy, the Rajah, emoluments amounting to about +60,000<i>l.</i> a year. Let us now see upon what grounds +he can justify the assignment of these emoluments. I +can perceive none but such as are founded upon the +opinion of its being necessary to the support of the<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_315" id="Page_315">{315}</a></span> +Rajah's dignity. Now, when Mr. Markham, who is +the sole ostensible actor in the management of the +new Rajah, as he had been a witness to the deposition +of the former, comes before you to give an account +of what he thought of Cheyt Sing, who appears to +have properly supported the dignity of his situation, +he tells you that about a lac or a lac and a half +(10,000<i>l.</i> or 15,000<i>l.</i>) a year was as much as Cheyt +Sing could spend. And yet this young creature, +settled in the same country, and who was to pay +400,000<i>l.</i> a year, instead of 250,000<i>l.</i>, tribute to the +Company, was authorized by Mr. Hastings to collect +and reserve to his own use 60,000<i>l.</i> out of the revenue. +That is to say, he was to receive four times +as much as was stated by Mr. Hastings, on Mr. Markham's +evidence, to have been necessary to support +him.</p> + +<p>Your Lordships tread upon corruption everywhere. +Why was such a large revenue given to the young +Rajah to support his dignity, when, as they say, Cheyt +Sing did not spend above a lac and half in support +of his,—though it is known he had great establishments +to maintain, that he had erected considerable +buildings adorned with fine gardens, and, according +to them, had made great preparations for war?</p> + +<p>We must at length imagine that they knew the +country could bear the impost imposed upon it. I +ask, How did they know this? We have proved to +you, by a paper presented here by Mr. Markham, that +the net amount of the collections was about 360,000<i>l.</i> +This is their own account, and was made up, as Mr. +Markham says, by one of the clerks of Durbege Sing, +together with his Persian moonshee, (a very fine council +to settle the revenues of the kingdom!) in his pri<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_316" id="Page_316">{316}</a></span>vate +house. And with this account before them, they +have dared to impose upon the necks of that unhappy +people a tribute of 400,000<i>l.</i>, together with an income +for the Rajah of 60,000<i>l.</i> These sums the Naib, +Durbege Sing, was bound to furnish, and left to +get them as he could. Your Lordships will observe +that I speak of the net proceeds of the collections. +We have nothing to do with the gross amount. We +are speaking of what came to the public treasury, +which was no more than I have stated; and it was +out of the public treasury that these payments were +to be made, because there could be no other honest +way of getting the money.</p> + +<p>But let us now come to the main point, which is +to ascertain what sums the country could really bear. +Mr. Hastings maintains (whether in the speech of his +counsel or otherwise I do not recollect) that the revenue +of the country was 400,000<i>l.</i>, that it constantly +paid that sum, and flourished under the payment. +In answer to this, I refer your Lordships, first, to Mr. +Markham's declaration, and the Wassil Baakee, which +is in page 1750 of the printed Minutes. I next refer +your Lordships to Mr. Duncan's Reports, in page +2493. According to Mr. Duncan's public estimate +of the revenue of Benares, the net collections of the +very year we are speaking of, when Durbege Sing +had the management, and when Mr. Markham, his +Persian moonshee, and a clerk in his private house, +made their estimates without any documents, or with +whatever documents, or God only knows, for nothing +appears on the record of the transaction,—the collections +yielded in that year but 340,000<i>l.</i>, that is, +20,000<i>l.</i> less than Mr. Markham's estimate. But take +it which way you will, whether you take it at Mr.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_317" id="Page_317">{317}</a></span> +Markham's 360,000<i>l.</i>, or at Mr. Duncan's 340,000<i>l.</i>, +your Lordships will see, that, after reserving 60,000<i>l.</i> +for his own private expenses, the Rajah could not realize +a sum nearly equal to the tribute demanded.</p> + +<p>Your Lordships have also in evidence before you +an account of the produce of the country for I believe +full five years after this period, from which it appears +that it never realized the forty lacs, or anything like +it,—yielding only thirty-seven and thirty-nine lacs, +or thereabouts, which is 20,000<i>l.</i> short of Mr. Markham's +estimate, and 160,000<i>l.</i> short of Mr. Hastings's. +On what data could the prisoner at your bar have +formed this estimate? Where were all the clerks and +mutsuddies, where were all the men of business in +Benares, who could have given him complete information +upon the subject? We do not find the trace +of any of them; all our information is Mr. Markham's +moonshee, and some clerk of Durbege Sing's employed +in Mr. Markham's private counting-house, in +estimating revenues of a country.</p> + +<p>The disposable revenue was still further reduced +by the jaghires which Mr. Hastings granted, but to +what amount does not appear. He mentions the increase +in the revenue by the confiscation of the estates +of the Baboos, who had been in rebellion. This +he rates at six lacs. But we have inspected the accounts, +we have examined them with that sedulous +attention which belongs to that branch of the legislature +that has the care of the public revenues, and we +have not found one trace of this addition. Whether +these confiscations were ever actually made remains +doubtful; but if they were made, the application or +the receipt of the money they yielded does not appear +in any account whatever. I leave your Lordships +to judge of this.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_318" id="Page_318">{318}</a></span></p> + +<p>But it may be said that Hastings might have been +in an error. If he was in an error, my Lords, his +error continued an extraordinary length of time. +The error itself was also extraordinary in a man of +business: it was an error of account. If his confidential +agent, Mr. Markham, had originally contributed +to lead him into the error, he soon perceived +it. He soon informed Mr. Hastings that his expectations +were erroneous, and that he had overrated the +country. What, then, are we to think of his persevering +in this error? Mr. Hastings might have +formed extravagant and wild expectations, when he +was going up the country to plunder; for we allow +that avarice may often overcalculate the hoards that +it is going to rob. If a thief is going to plunder a +banker's shop, his avarice, when running the risk of +his life, may lead him to imagine there is more money +in the shop than there really is. But when this man +was in possession of the country, how came he not to +know and understand the condition of it better? In +fact, he was well acquainted with it; for he has declared +it to be his opinion that forty lacs was an overrated +calculation, and that the country could not +continue to pay this tribute at the very time he was +imposing it. You have this admission in page 294 +of the printed Minutes; but in the very face of it he +says, if the Rajah will exert himself, and continue +for some years the regular payment, he will then +grant him a remission. Thus the Rajah was told, +what he well knew, that he was overrated, but that +at some time or another he was to expect a remission. +And what, my Lords, was the condition upon which +he was to obtain this promised indulgence? The +punctual payment of that which Mr. Hastings de<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_319" id="Page_319">{319}</a></span>clares +he was not able to pay,—and which he could +not pay without ruining the country, betraying his +own honor and character, and acting directly contrary +to the duties of the station in which Mr. Hastings +had placed him. Thus this unfortunate man was +compelled to have recourse to the most rigorous exaction, +that he might be enabled to satisfy the exorbitant +demand which had been made upon him.</p> + +<p>But let us suppose that the country was able to +afford the sum at which it was assessed, and that +nothing was required but vigor and activity in the Rajah. +Did Mr. Hastings endeavor to make his strength +equal to the task imposed on him? No: the direct +contrary. In proportion as he augmented the burdens +of this man, in just that proportion he took away +his strength and power of supporting these burdens. +There was not one of the external marks of honor +which attended the government of Cheyt Sing that +he did not take away from the new Rajah; and still, +when this new man came to his new authority, deprived +of all external marks of consequence, and degraded +in the opinion of his subjects, he was to extort +from his people an additional revenue, payable +to the Company, of fifteen lacs of rupees more than +was paid by the late Rajah in all the plenitude of +undivided authority. To increase this difficulty still +more, the father and guardian of this inexperienced +youth was a man who had no credit or reputation +in the country. This circumstance alone was a sufficient +drawback from the weight of his authority; but +Mr. Hastings took care that he should be divested +of it altogether; for, as our charge states, he placed +him under the immediate direction of Mr. Markham, +and consequently Mr. Markham was the gov<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_320" id="Page_320">{320}</a></span>ernor +of the country. Could a man with a reduced, +divided, contemptible authority venture to strike such +bold and hardy strokes as would be efficient without +being oppressive? Could he or any other man, thus +bound and shackled, execute such vigorous and energetic +measures as were necessary to realize such +an enormous tribute as was imposed upon this unhappy +country?</p> + +<p>My Lords, I must now call your attention to another +circumstance, not mentioned in the charge, but +connected with the appointment of the new Rajah, +and of his Naib, Durbege Sing, and demonstrative +of the unjust and cruel treatment to which they +were exposed. It appears from a letter produced +here by Mr. Markham, (upon which kind of correspondence +I shall take the liberty to remark hereafter,) +that the Rajah lived in perpetual apprehension +of being removed, and that a person called +Ussaun Sing was intended as his successor. Mr. +Markham, in one part of his correspondence, tells +you that the Rajah did not intend to hold the government +any longer. Why? Upon a point of right, +namely, that he did not possess it upon the same +advantageous terms as Cheyt Sing; but he tells you +in another letter, (and this is a much better key to +the whole transaction,) that he was in dread of that +Ussaun Sing whom I have just mentioned. This +man Mr. Hastings kept ready to terrify the Rajah; +and you will, in the course of these transactions, +see that there is not a man in India, of any consideration, +against whom Mr. Hastings did not keep +a kind of pretender, to keep him in continual awe. +This Ussaun Sing, whom Mr. Hastings brought up +with him to Benares, was dreaded by Cheyt Sing<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_321" id="Page_321">{321}</a></span> +not less than by his successor. We find that he +was at first nominated Naib or acting governor of +the country, but had never been put in actual possession +of this high office, and Durbege Sing was +appointed to it. Although Ussaun Sing was thus +removed, he continued his pretensions, and constantly +solicited the office. Thus the poor man +appointed by Mr. Hastings, and actually in possession, +was not only called upon to perform tasks beyond +his strength, but was overawed by Mr. Markham, +and terrified by Ussaun Sing, (the mortal enemy +of the family,) who, like an accusing fiend, was +continually at his post, and unceasingly reiterating +his accusations. This Ussaun Sing was, as Mr. +Markham tells you, one of the causes of the Rajah's +continued dejection and despondency. But it does +not appear that any of these circumstances were ever +laid before the Council; the whole passed between +Mr. Hastings and Mr. Markham.</p> + +<p>Mr. Hastings having by his arbitrary will thus disposed +of the revenue and of the landed property of +Benares, we will now trace his further proceedings +and their effects. He found the country most flourishing +in agriculture and in trade; but not satisfied +with the experiment he had made upon the government, +upon the revenues, upon the reigning family, +and upon all the landed property, he resolved to +make as bold and as novel an experiment upon the +commercial interests of the country. Accordingly +he entirely changed that part of the revenue system +which affects trade and commerce, the life and soul +of a state. Without any advice that we know of, +except Mr. Markham's, he sat down to change in +every point the whole commercial system of that<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_322" id="Page_322">{322}</a></span> +country; and he effected the change upon the same +arbitrary principles which he had before acted upon, +namely, his own arbitrary will. We are told, indeed, +that he consulted bankers and merchants; but when +your Lordships shall have learned what has happened +from this experiment, you will easily see +whether he did resort to proper sources of information +or not. You will see that the mischief which +has happened has proceeded from the exercise of arbitrary +power. Arbitrary power, my Lords, is always +a miserable creature. When a man once adopts +it as the principle of his actions, no one dares to tell +him a truth, no one dares to give him any information +that is disagreeable to him; for all know that +their life and fortune depend upon his caprice. Thus +the man who lives in the exercise of arbitrary power +condemns himself to eternal ignorance. Of this the +prisoner at your bar affords us a striking example. +This man, without advice, without assistance, and +without resource, except in his own arbitrary power, +stupidly ignorant in himself, and puffed up with the +constant companion of ignorance, a blind presumption, +alters the system of commercial imposts, and +thereby ruined the whole trade of the country, leaving +no one part of it undestroyed.</p> + +<p>Let me now call your Lordships' attention to his +assumption of power, without one word of communication +with the Council at Calcutta, where the whole +of these trading regulations might and ought to have +been considered, and where they could have been deliberately +examined and determined upon. By this +assumption the Council was placed in the situation +which I have before described: it must either confirm +his acts, or again undo everything which had been<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_323" id="Page_323">{323}</a></span> +done. He had provided not only against resistance, +but almost against any inquiry into his wild projects. +He had by his opium contracts put all vigilance +asleep, and by his bullock and other contracts he had +secured a variety of concealed interests, both abroad +and at home. He was sure of the ratification of his +acts by the Council, whenever he should please to inform +them of his measures; and to his secret influence +he trusted for impunity in his career of tyranny +and oppression.</p> + +<p>In bringing before you his arbitrary mode of imposing +duties, I beg to remind your Lordships, that, when +I examined Mr. Markham concerning the imposing +of a duty of five per cent instead of the former duty +of two, I asked him whether that five per cent was +not laid on in such a manner as utterly to extinguish +the trade, and whether it was not in effect and substance +five times as much as had been paid before. +What was his answer? Why, that many plans, +which, when considered in the closet, look specious +and plausible, will not hold when they come to be +tried in practice, and that this plan was one of them. +The additional duties, said he, have never since been +exacted. But, my Lords, the very attempt to exact +them utterly ruined the trade of the country. They +were imposed upon a visionary theory, formed in his +own closet, and the result was exactly what might +have been anticipated. Was it not an abominable +thing in Mr. Hastings to withhold from the Council +the means of ascertaining the real operation of his +taxes? He had no knowledge of trade himself; he +cannot keep an account; he has no memory. In fact, +we find him a man possessed of no one quality fit for +any kind of business whatever. We find him pursu<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_324" id="Page_324">{324}</a></span>ing +his own visionary projects, without knowing anything +of the nature or [of?] the circumstances under +which the trade of the country was carried on. These +projects might have looked very plausible: but when +you come to examine the actual state of the trade, it is +not merely a difference between five and two per cent, +but it becomes a different mode of estimating the +commodity, and it amounts to five times as much as +was paid before. We bring this as an exemplification +of this cursed mode of arbitrary proceeding, and +to show you his total ignorance of the subject, and his +total indifference about the event of the measure he +was pursuing. When he began to perceive his blunders, +he never took any means whatever to put the +new regulations which these blunders had made necessary +into execution, but he left all this mischievous +project to rage in its full extent.</p> + +<p>I have shown your Lordships how he managed the +private property of the country, how he managed the +government, and how he managed the trade. I am +now to call your Lordships' attention to some of the +consequences which have resulted from the instances +of management, or rather gross mismanagement, +which have been brought before you. Your Lordships +will recollect that none of these violent and +arbitrary measures, either in their conception or in +the progress of their execution, were officially made +known to the Council; and you will observe, as we +proved, that the same criminal concealment existed +with respect to the fatal consequences of these acts.</p> + +<p>After the flight of Cheyt Sing, the revenues were +punctually paid by the Naib, Durbege Sing, month +by month, kist by kist, until the month of July, and +then, as the country had suffered some distress, the<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_325" id="Page_325">{325}</a></span> +Naib wished this kist, or instalment, to be thrown on +the next month. You will ask why he wished to +burden this month beyond the rest. I reply, The +reason was obvious: the month of August is the last +of the year, and he would, at its expiration, have the +advantage of viewing the receipts of the whole year, +and ascertaining the claim of the country to the remission +of a part of the annual tribute which Mr. +Hastings had promised, provided the instalments were +paid regularly. It was well known to everybody that +the country had suffered very considerably by the +revolt, and by a drought which prevailed that year. +The Rajah, therefore, expected to avail himself of +Mr. Hastings's flattering promise, and to save by the +delay the payment of one of the two kists. But mark +the course that was taken. The two kists were at +once demanded at the end of the year, and no remission +of tribute was allowed. By the promise of +remission Mr. Hastings tacitly acknowledged that the +Rajah was overburdened; and he admits that the payment +of the July kist was postponed at the Rajah's +own desire. He must have seen the Rajah's motive +for desiring delay, and he ought to have taken care +that this poor man should not be oppressed and ruined +by this compliance with requests founded on +such motives.</p> + +<p>So passed the year 1781. No complaints of arrears +in Durbege Sing's payments appear on record before +the month of April, 1782; and I wish your Lordships +seriously to advert to the circumstances attending +the evidence respecting these arrears, which has been +produced for the first time by the prisoner in his defence +here at your bar. This evidence does not appear +in the Company's records; it does not appear<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_326" id="Page_326">{326}</a></span> +in the book of the Benares correspondence; it does +not appear in any documents to which the Commons +could have access; it was unknown to the Directors, +unknown to the Council, unknown to the Residents, +Mr. Markham's successors, at Benares, unknown to +the searching and inquisitive eye of the Commons of +Great Britain. This important evidence was drawn +out of Mr. Markham's pocket, in the presence of your +Lordships. It consists of a private correspondence +which he carried on with Mr. Hastings, unknown to +the Council, after Durbege Sing had been appointed +Naib, after the new government had been established, +after Mr. Hastings had quitted that province, and +had apparently wholly abandoned it, and when there +was no reason whatever why the correspondence +should not be public. This private correspondence +of Mr. Markham's, now produced for the first time, +is full of the bitterest complaints against Durbege +Sing. These clandestine complaints, these underhand +means of accomplishing the ruin of a man, without +the knowledge of his true and proper judges, we +produce to your Lordships as a heavy aggravation of +our charge, and as a proof of a wicked conspiracy to +destroy the man. For if there was any danger of his +falling into arrears when the heavy accumulated kists +came upon him, the Council ought to have known +that danger; they ought to have known every particular +of these complaints: for Mr. Hastings had then +carried into effect his own plans.</p> + +<p>I ought to have particularly marked for your Lordships' +attention this second era of clandestine correspondence +between Mr. Hastings and Mr. Markham. +It commenced after Mr. Hastings had quitted Benares, +and had nothing to do with it but as Gov<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_327" id="Page_327">{327}</a></span>ernor-General: +even after his extraordinary, and, as +we contend, illegal, power had completely expired, +the same clandestine correspondence was carried on. +He apparently considered Benares as his private +property; and just as a man acts with his private +steward about his private estate, so he acted with the +Resident at Benares. He receives from him and +answers letters containing a series of complaints +against Durbege Sing, which began in April and continued +to the month of November, without making +any public communication of them. He never laid +one word of this correspondence before the Council +until the 29th of November, and he had then completely +settled the fate of this Durbege Sing.</p> + +<p>This clandestine correspondence we charge against +him as an act of rebellion; for he was bound to lay +before the Council the whole of his correspondence +relative to the revenue and all the other affairs of the +country. We charge it not only as rebellion against +the orders of the Company and the laws of the land, +but as a wicked plot to destroy this man, by depriving +him of any opportunity of defending himself +before the Council, his lawful judges. I wish to +impress it strongly on your Lordships' minds, that +neither the complaints of Mr. Markham nor the exculpations +of Durbege Sing were ever made known +till Mr. Markham was examined in this hall.</p> + +<p>The first intimation afforded the Council of what +had been going on at Benares from April, 1782, at +which time, Mr. Markham says, the complaints against +Durbege Sing had risen to serious importance, was in +a letter dated the 27th of November following. This +letter was sent to the Council from Nia Serai, in the +Ganges, where Mr. Hastings had retired for the bene<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_328" id="Page_328">{328}</a></span>fit +of the air. During the whole time he was in Calcutta, +it does not appear upon the records that he had +ever held any communication with the Council upon +the subject. The letter is in the printed Minutes, +page 298, and is as follows.</p> + +<p>"<i>The Governor-General.</i>—I desire the Secretary +to lay the accompanying letters from Mr. Markham +before the board, and request that orders may be immediately +sent to him concerning the subjects contained +in them. It may be necessary to inform the +board, that, on repeated information from Mr. Markham, +which indeed was confirmed to me beyond a +doubt by other channels, and by private assurances +which I could trust, that the affairs of that province +were likely to fall into the greatest confusion from +the misconduct of Baboo Durbege Sing, whom I had +appointed the Naib, fearing the dangerous consequences +of a delay, and being at too great a distance +to consult the members of the board, who I knew +could repose that confidence in my local knowledge +as to admit of this occasional exercise of my own separate +authority, I wrote to Mr. Markham the letter to +which he alludes, dated the 29th of September last, of +which I now lay before the board a copy. The first +of the accompanying letters from Mr. Markham arrived +at a time when a severe return of my late illness +obliged me, by the advice of my physicians, to +leave Calcutta for the benefit of the country air, and +prevented me from bringing it earlier before the +notice of the board."</p> + +<p>I have to remark upon this part of the letter, that +he claims for himself an exercise of his own authority. +He had now no delegation, and therefore no claim to +separate authority. He was only a member of the<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_329" id="Page_329">{329}</a></span> +board, obliged to do everything according to the decision +of the majority, and yet he speaks of his own +separate authority; and after complimenting himself, +he requests its confirmation. The complaints of Mr. +Markham had been increasing, growing, and multiplying +upon him, from the month of April preceding, +and he had never given the least intimation of it to +the board until he wrote this letter. This was at so +late a period that he then says, "The time won't wait +for a remedy; I am obliged to use my own separate +authority"; although he had had abundant time for +laying the whole matter before the Council.</p> + +<p>He next goes on to say,—"It had, indeed, been my +intention, but for the same cause, to have requested +the instructions of the board for the conduct of Mr. +Markham in the difficulties which he had to encounter +immediately after the date of my letter to him, +and to have recommended the substance of it for an +order to the board." He seems to have promised Mr. +Markham, that, if the violent act which Mr. Markham +proposed, and which he, Mr. Hastings, ordered, was +carried into execution, an authority should be procured +from the board. He, however, did not get Mr. +Markham such an authority. Why? Because he +was resolved, as he has told you, to act by his own +separate authority; and because, as he has likewise +told you, that he disobeys the orders of the Court of +Directors, and defies the laws of his country, as a signal +of his authority.</p> + +<p>Now what does he recommend to the board? That +it will be pleased to confirm the appointment which +Mr. Markham made in obedience to his individual +orders, as well as the directions which he had given +him to exact from Baboo Durbege Sing with the ut<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_330" id="Page_330">{330}</a></span>most +rigor every rupee of the collections, and either +to confine him at Benares or send him to Chunar and +imprison him there until the whole of his arrears +were paid up. Here, then, my Lords, you have, +what plainly appears in every act of Mr. Hastings, a +feeling of resentment for some personal injury. "I +feel myself," says he, "and may be allowed on such +an occasion to acknowledge it, personally hurt at the +ingratitude of this man, and the discredit which his +ill conduct has thrown on my appointment of him. +The Rajah himself, scarcely arrived at the verge of +manhood, was in understanding but little advanced +beyond the term of childhood; and it had been the +policy of Cheyt Sing to keep him equally secluded +from the world and from business." This is the character +Mr. Hastings gives of a man whom he appointed +to govern the country. He goes on to say of Durbege +Sing,—"As he was allowed a jaghire of a very liberal +amount, to enable him to maintain a state and +consequence suitable both to the relation in which he +stood to the Rajah and the high office which had been +assigned to him, and sufficient also to free him from +the temptation of little and mean peculations, it is +therefore my opinion, and I recommend, that Mr. +Markham be ordered to divest him of his jaghire, and +reunite it to the <i>malguzaree</i>, or the land paying its +revenue through the Rajah to the Company. The +opposition made by the Rajah and the old Ranny, +both equally incapable of judging for themselves, do +certainly originate from some secret influence which +ought to be checked by a decided and peremptory +declaration of the authority of the board, and a denunciation +of their displeasure at their presumption. +If they can be induced to yield the appearance of a<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_331" id="Page_331">{331}</a></span> +cheerful acquiescence in the new arrangement, and to +adopt it as a measure formed with their participation, +it would be better than that it should be done by a +declared act of compulsion; but at all events it ought +to be done." My Lords, it had been already done: +the Naib was dismissed; he was imprisoned; his jaghire +was confiscated: all these things were done by +Mr. Hastings's orders. He had resolved to take the +whole upon himself; he had acted upon that resolution +before he addressed this letter to the board.</p> + +<p>Thus, my Lords, was this unhappy man punished +without any previous trial, or any charges, except +the complaints of Mr. Markham, and some other private +information which Mr. Hastings said he had received. +Before the poor object of these complaints +could make up his accounts, before a single step was +taken, judicially or officially, to convict him of any +crime, he was sent to prison, and his private estates +confiscated.</p> + +<p>My Lords, the Commons of Great Britain claim +from you, that no man shall be imprisoned till a regular +charge is made against him, and the accused +fairly heard in his defence. They claim from you, +that no man shall be imprisoned on a matter of account, +until the account is settled between the parties. +And claiming this, we do say that the prisoner's +conduct towards Durbege Sing was illegal, unjust, +violent, and oppressive. The imprisonment of this +man was clearly illegal on the part of Mr. Hastings, +as he acted without the authority of the Council, and +doubly oppressive, as the imprisoned man was thereby +disabled from settling his account with the numberless +sub-accountants whom he had to deal with in the +collection of the revenue.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_332" id="Page_332">{332}</a></span></p> + +<p>Having now done with these wicked, flagitious, +abandoned, and abominable acts, I shall proceed to +the extraordinary powers given by Mr. Hastings to his +instrument, Mr. Markham, who was employed in perpetrating +these acts, and to the very extraordinary +instructions which he gave this instrument for his +conduct in the execution of the power intrusted to +him. In a letter to Mr. Markham, he says,—</p> + +<p>"I need not tell you, my dear Sir, that I possess a +very high opinion of your abilities, and that I repose +the utmost confidence in your integrity." He might +have had reason for both, but he scarcely left to Mr +Markham the use of either. He arbitrarily imposed +upon him the tasks which he wished him to execute, +and he engaged to bear out his acts by his own power. +"From your long residence at Benares," says +he, "and from the part you have had in the business +of that zemindary, you must certainly best know the +men who are most capable and deserving of public +employment. From among these I authorize you to +nominate a Naib to the Rajah, in the room of Durbege +Sing, whom, on account of his ill conduct, I +think it necessary to dismiss from that office. It will +be hardly necessary to except Ussaun Sing from the +description of men to whom I have limited your +choice, yet it may not be improper to apprise you +that I will on no terms consent to his being Naib. +In forming the arrangements consequent upon this +new appointment, I request you will, as far as you +can with propriety, adopt those which were in use +during the life of Bulwant Sing,—so far, at least, as +to have distinct offices for distinct purposes, independent +of each other, and with proper men at the +head of each; so that one office may detect or pre<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_333" id="Page_333">{333}</a></span>vent +any abuses or irregularities in the others, and +together form a system of reciprocal checks. Upon +that principle, I desire you will in particular establish, +under whatever names, one office of receipts, +and another of treasury. The officers of both must +be responsible for the truth and regularity of their +respective accounts, but not subject in the statement +of them to the control or interference of the Rajah or +Naib; nor should they be removable at pleasure, but +for manifest misconduct only. At the head of one +or other of these offices I could wish to see the late +Buckshee, Rogoober Dyall. His conduct in his +former office, his behavior on the revolt of Cheyt +Sing, and particularly at the fall of Bidjegur, together +with his general character, prove him worthy +of employment, and of the notice of our government. +It is possible that he may have objections to holding +an office under the present Rajah: offer him one, however, +and let him know that you do so by my directions." +He then goes on to say,—"Do not wholly +neglect the Rajah; consult with him in appearance, +but in appearance only. His situation requires that +you should do that much; but his youth and inexperience +forbid that you should do more."</p> + +<p>You see, my Lords, he has completely put the +whole government into the hands of a man who had +no name, character, or official situation, but that of +the Company's Resident at that place. Let us now +see what is the office of a Resident. It is to reside +at the court of the native prince, to give the Council +notice of the transactions that are going on there, and +to take care that the tribute be regularly paid, kist +by kist. But we have seen that Mr. Markham, the +Resident at Benares, was invested by Mr. Hastings<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_334" id="Page_334">{334}</a></span> +with supreme authority in this unhappy country. +He was to name whoever he pleased to its government, +with the exception of Ussaun Sing, and to +drive out the person who had possessed it under an +authority which could only be revoked by the Council. +Thus Mr. Hastings delegated to Mr. Markham +an authority which he himself did not really possess, +and which could only be legally exercised through +the medium of the Council.</p> + +<p>With respect to Durbege Sing, he adds,—"He has +dishonored my choice of him." <i>My</i> choice of him! +"It now only remains to guard against the ill effects +of his misconduct, to detect and punish it. To +this end I desire that the officers to be appointed in +consequence of these instructions do, with as much +accuracy and expedition as possible, make out an account +of the receipts, disbursements, and transactions +of Durbege Sing, during the time he has acted as +Naib of the zemindary of Benares; and I desire you +will, in my name, assure him, that, unless he pays at +the limited time every rupee of the revenue due to +the Company, his life shall answer for the default. +I need not caution you to provide against his flight, +and the removal of his effects." He here says, my +Lords, that he will detect and punish him; but the +first thing he does, without any detection, even before +the accounts he talks of are made up, and without +knowing whether he has got the money or not, he +declares that he will have every rupee paid at the +time, or otherwise the Naib's life shall pay for it.</p> + +<p>Is this the language of a British governor,—of a +person appointed to govern <i>by law</i> nations subject to +the dominion and under the protection of this kingdom? +Is he to order a man to be first imprisoned<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_335" id="Page_335">{335}</a></span> +and deprived of his property, then, for an inquiry to +be made, and to declare, during that inquiry, that, +if every rupee of a presumed embezzlement be not +paid up, the life of his victim shall answer for it? +And accordingly this man's life did answer for it,—as +I have already had occasion to mention to your +Lordships.</p> + +<p>I will now read Mr. Markham's letter to the Council, +in which he enters into the charges against +Durbege Sing, after this unhappy man had been +imprisoned.</p> + +<p>Benares, 24th of October, 1782.—"I am sorry +that my duty obliges me to mention to your Honorable +Board my apprehensions of a severe loss accruing +to the Honorable Company, if Baboo Durbege Sing is +continued in the Naibut during the present year. I +ground my fears on the knowledge I have had of his +mismanagement, the bad choice he has made of his +aumils, the mistrust which they have of him, and the +several complaints which have been preferred to me +by the ryots of almost every purgunnah in the zemindary. +I did not choose to waste the time of your +Honorable Board in listening to my representations +of his inattention to the complaints of oppression +which were made to him by his ryots, as I hoped +that a letter he received from the Honorable Governor-General +would have had weight sufficient to +have made him more regular in his business, and +more careful of his son's interest."</p> + +<p>My Lords, think of the condition of your government +in India! Here is a Resident at Benares exercising +power not given to him by virtue of his office, +but given only by the private orders of the prisoner +at your bar. And what is it he does? He says, he<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_336" id="Page_336">{336}</a></span> +did not choose to trouble the Council with a particular +account of his reasons for removing a man who +possessed an high office under their immediate appointment. +The Council was not to know them: he +did not choose to waste the time of their honorable +board in listening to the complaints of the people. +No: the honorable board is not to have its time +wasted in that improper manner; therefore, without +the least inquiry or inquisition, the man must be imprisoned, +and deprived of his office; he must have +all his property confiscated, and be threatened with +the loss of his life.</p> + +<p>These are crimes, my Lords, for which the Commons +of Great Britain knock at the breasts of your +consciences, and call for justice. They would think +themselves dishonored forever, if they had not +brought these crimes before your Lordships, and with +the utmost energy demanded your vindictive justice, +to the fullest extent in which it can be rendered.</p> + +<p>But there are some aggravating circumstances in +these crimes, which I have not yet stated. It appears +that this unhappy and injured man was, without +any solicitation of his own, placed in a situation +the duties of which even Mr. Hastings considered it +impossible for him to execute. Instead of supporting +him with the countenance of the supreme government, +Mr. Hastings did everything to lessen his +weight, his consequence, and authority. And when +the business of the collection became embarrassed, +without any fault of his, that has ever yet been +proved, Mr. Markham instituted an inquiry. What +kind of inquiry it was that would or could be made +your Lordships will judge. While this was going +on, Mr. Markham tells you, that, in consequence of<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_337" id="Page_337">{337}</a></span> +orders which he had received, he first put him into +a gentle confinement. Your Lordships know what +that confinement was; and you know what it is for +a man of his rank to be put into any confinement. +We have shown he was thereby incapable of transacting +business. His life had been threatened, if he +should not pay in the balance of his accounts within +a short limited time; still he was subjected to confinement, +while he had money accounts to settle with +the whole country. Could a man in gaol, dishonored +and reprobated, take effectual means to recover +the arrears which he was called upon to pay? +Could he, in such a situation, recover the money +which was unpaid to him, in such an extensive district +as Benares? Yet Mr. Markham tells the Council +he thought proper "that Durbege Sing should be +put under a gentle confinement, until I shall receive +your Honorable Board's orders for any future measures." +Thus Mr. Markham, without any orders +from the Council, assumed an authority to do that +which we assert a Resident at Benares had no right +to do, but to which he was instigated by Mr. Hastings's +recommendation that Durbege Sing should be +prevented from flight.</p> + +<p>Now, my Lords, was it to be expected that a man +of Durbege Sing's rank should suffer these hardships +and indignities, and at the same time kiss the rod +and say, "I have deserved it all"? We know that +all mankind revolts at oppression, if it be real; we +know that men do not willingly submit to punishment, +just or unjust; and we find that Durbege Sing +had near relatives, who used for his relief all the +power which was left them,—that of remonstrating with +his oppressors. Two <i>arzees</i>, or petitions, were<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_338" id="Page_338">{338}</a></span> +presented to the Council, of which we shall first call +your Lordships' attention to one from the dowager +princess of Benares, in favor of her child and of her +family.</p> + +<div class="blockquote"> +<p class="center"><i>From the Ranny, widow of Bulwant Sing. Received the +15th of December, 1782.</i></p> + +<p>"I and my children have no hopes but from your +Highness, and our honor and rank are bestowed by +you. Mr. Markham, from the advice of my enemies, +having protected the farmers, would not permit the +balances to be collected. Baboo Durbege Sing frequently +before desired that gentleman to show his +resentment against the people who owed balances, +that the balances might be collected, and to give ease +to his mind for the present year, conformably to the +requests signed by the presence, that he might complete +the <i>bundobust</i>. But that gentleman would not +listen to him, and, having appointed a <i>mutsuddy</i> +and <i>tahsildar</i>, employs them in the collections of the +year, and sent two companies of sepoys and arrested +Baboo Durbege Sing upon this charge, that he had +secreted in his house many lacs of rupees from the +collections, and he carried the mutsuddies and treasurer +with their papers to his own presence. He neither +ascertained this matter by proofs, nor does he +complete the balance of the sircar from the <i>jaidads</i> +of the balances: right or wrong, he is resolved to destroy +our lives. As we have no asylum or hope except +from your Highness, and as the Almighty has +formed your mind to be a distributor of justice in +these times, I therefore hope from the benignity of +your Highness, that you will inquire and do justice +in this matter, and that an <i>aumeen</i> may be ap<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_339" id="Page_339">{339}</a></span>pointed +from the presence, that, having discovered +the crimes or innocence of Baboo Durbege Sing, +he may report to the presence. Further particulars +will be made known to your Highness by the arzee +of my son Rajah Mehip Narrain Bahadur."</p> + + +<p class="center"><i>Arzee from Rajah Mehip Narrain Bahadur. Received +15th December, 1782.</i></p> + +<p>"I before this had the honor of addressing several +arzees to your presence; but, from my unfortunate +state, not one of them has been perused by your +Highness, that my situation might be fully learnt by +you. The case is this. Mr. Markham, from the +advice of my enemies, having occasioned several +kinds of losses, and given protection to those who +owed balances, prevented the balance from being +collected,—for this reason, that, the money not being +paid in time, the Baboo might be convicted of inability. +From this reason, all the owers of balances +refused to pay the <i>malwajib</i> of the sircar. Before +this, the Baboo had frequently desired that gentleman +to show his resentment against the persons who +owed the balances, that the balances might be paid, +and that his mind might be at ease for the present +year, so that the <i>bundobust</i> of the present year might +be completed,—adding, that, if, next year, such kinds +of injuries, and protection of the farmers, were to +happen, he should not be able to support it."</p> +</div> + +<p>I am here to remark to your Lordships, that the +last of these petitions begins by stating, "I before +this have had the honor of addressing several arzees +to your presence; but, from my unfortunate state, not +one of them has been perused by your Highness."<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_340" id="Page_340">{340}</a></span> +My Lords, if there is any one right secured to the +subject, it is that of presenting a petition and having +that petition noticed. This right grows in importance +in proportion to the power and despotic nature of the +governments to which the petitioner is subject: for +where there is no sort of remedy from any fixed laws, +nothing remains but complaint, and prayers, and +petitions. This was the case in Benares: for Mr. +Hastings had destroyed every trace of law, leaving +only the police of the single city of Benares. Still +we find this complaint, prayer, and petition was not +the first, but only one of many, which Mr. Hastings +took no notice of, entirely despised, and never would +suffer to be produced to the Council; which never +knew anything, until this bundle of papers came +before them, of the complaint of Mr. Markham +against Durbege Sing, or of the complaint of Durbege +Sing against Mr. Markham.</p> + +<p>Observe, my Lords, the person that put Durbege +Sing in prison was Mr. Markham; while the complaint +in the arzee is, that Mr. Markham was himself +the cause of the very failure for which he imprisoned +him. Now what was the conduct of Mr. Hastings as +judge? He has two persons before him: the one in +the ostensible care of the revenue of the country; +the other his own agent, acting under his authority. +The first is accused by the second of default in his +payments; the latter is complained of by the former, +who says that the occasion of the accusation had been +furnished by him, the accuser. The judge, instead +of granting redress, dismisses the complaints against +Mr. Markham with reprehension, and sends the complainant +to rot in prison, without making one inquiry, +or giving himself the trouble of stating to Mr. Mark<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_341" id="Page_341">{341}</a></span>ham +the complaints against him, and desiring him to +clear himself from them. My Lords, if there were +nothing but this to mark the treacherous and perfidious +nature of his conduct, this would be sufficient.</p> + +<p>In this state of things, Mr. Hastings thus writes.</p> + +<p>"To Mr. Markham. The measures which you have +taken with Baboo Durbege Sing are perfectly right +and proper, so far as they go; and we now direct +that you exact from him, with the utmost rigor, every +rupee of the collections which it shall appear that +he has made and not brought to account, and either +confine him at Benares, or send him prisoner to Chunar, +and keep him in confinement until he shall have +discharged the whole of the amount due from him."</p> + +<p>He here employs the very person against whom +the complaint is made to imprison the complainant. +He approves the conduct of his agent without having +heard his defence, and leaves him, at his option, to +keep his victim a prisoner at Benares, or to imprison +him in the fortress of Chunar, the infernal place to +which he sends the persons whom he has a mind to +extort money from.</p> + +<p>Your Lordships will be curious to know how this +debt of Durbege Sing stood at the time of his imprisonment. +I will state the matter to your Lordships +briefly, and in plain language, referring you for the +particulars of the account to the papers which are in +your Minutes. It appears from them, that, towards +the end of the yearly account in 1782, a kist or payment +of eight lacs (about 80,000<i>l.</i>), the balance of +the annual tribute, was due. In part of this kist, +Durbege Sing paid two lacs (20,000<i>l.</i>). Of the remaining +six lacs (60,000<i>l.</i>), the outstanding debts in +the country due to the revenue, but not collected by<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_342" id="Page_342">{342}</a></span> +the Naib, amounted to four lacs (40,000<i>l.</i>). Thus +far the account is not controverted by the accusing +party. But Mr. Markham asserts that he <i>shall</i> be able +to prove that the Naib had also actually received the +other two lacs (20,000<i>l.</i>), and consequently was an +actual defaulter to that amount, and had, upon the +whole, suffered the annual tribute to fall six lacs in +arrear. The Naib denies the receipt of the two lacs +just mentioned, and challenges inquiry; but no inquiries +appear to have been made, and to this hour +Mr. Markham has produced no proof of the fact. +With respect to the arrear of the tribute money which +appeared on the balance of the whole account, the +Naib defended himself by alleging the distresses of the +country, the diminution of his authority, and the want +of support from the supreme government in the collection +of the revenues; and he asserts that he has +assets sufficient, if time and power be allowed him for +collecting them, to discharge the whole balance due +to the Company. The immediate payment of the +whole balance was demanded, and Durbege Sing, unable +to comply with the demand, was sent to prison. +Thus stood the business, when Mr. Markham, +soon after he had sent the Naib to prison, quitted the +Residency. He was succeeded by Mr. Benn, who +acted exactly upon the same principle. He declares +that the six lacs demanded were not demanded upon +the principle of its having been actually collected by +him, but upon the principle of his having agreed to +pay it. "We have," say Mr. Hastings's agents to the +Naib, "we have a Jew's bond. If it is in your bond, +we will have it, or we will have a pound of your flesh: +whether you have received it or not is no business of +ours." About this time some hopes were entertained<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_343" id="Page_343">{343}</a></span> +by the Resident that the Naib's personal exertions in +collecting the arrears of the tribute might be useful. +These hopes procured him a short liberation from his +confinement. He was let out of prison, and appears to +have made another payment of half a lac of rupees. +Still the terms of the bond were insisted on, although +Mr. Hastings had allowed that these terms were extravagant, +and only one lac and a half of the money +which had been actually received remained unpaid. +One would think that common charity, that common +decency, that common regard to the decorum of life +would, under such circumstances, have hindered Mr. +Hastings from imprisoning him again. But, my +Lords, he was imprisoned again; he continued in +prison till Mr. Hastings quitted the country; and +there he soon after died,—a victim to the enormous +oppression which has been detailed to your Lordships.</p> + +<p>It appears that in the mean time the Residents had +been using other means for recovering the balance +due to the Company. The family of the Rajah had +not been paid one shilling of the 60,000<i>l.</i>, allowed for +their maintenance. They were obliged to mortgage +their own hereditary estates for their support, while +the Residents confiscated all the property of Durbege +Sing. Of the money thus obtained what account has +been given? None, my Lords, none. It must therefore +have been disposed of in some abominably corrupt +way or other, while this miserable victim of Mr. +Hastings was left to perish in a prison, after he had +been elevated to the highest rank in the country.</p> + +<p>But, without doubt, they found abundance of effects +after his death? No, my Lords, they did not find +anything. They ransacked his house; they examined<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_344" id="Page_344">{344}</a></span> +all his accounts, every paper that he had, in and out +of prison. They searched and scrutinized everything. +They had every penny of his fortune, and I believe, +though I cannot with certainty know, that the man +died insolvent; and it was not pretended that he had +ever applied to his own use any part of the Company's +money.</p> + +<p>Thus Durbege Sing is gone; this tragedy is finished; +a second Rajah of Benares has been destroyed. +I do not speak of that miserable puppet who was said +by Mr. Hastings to be in a state of childhood when +arrived at manhood, but of the person who represented +the dignity of the family. He is gone; he is +swept away; and in his name, in the name of this +devoted Durbege Sing, in the name of his afflicted +family, in the name of the people of the country +thus oppressed by an usurped authority, in the name +of all these, respecting whom justice has been thus +outraged, we call upon your Lordships for justice.</p> + +<p>We are now at the commencement of a new order +of things. Mr. Markham had been authorized to +appoint whoever he pleased as Naib, with the exception +of Ussaun Sing. He accordingly exercises this +power, and chooses a person called Jagher Deo Seo. +From the time of the confinement of Durbege Sing to +the time of this man's being put into the government, +in whose hands were the revenues of the country? +Mr. Markham himself has told you, at your bar, that +they were in his hands,—that he was the person who +not only named this man, but that he had the sole +management of the revenues; and he was, of course, +answerable for them all that time. The nominal +title of Zemindar was still left to the miserable pageant +who held it; but even the very name soon fell<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_345" id="Page_345">{345}</a></span> +entirely out of use. It is in evidence before your +Lordships that his name is not even so much as mentioned +in the proceedings of the government; and +that the person who really governed was not the ostensible +Jagher Deo Seo, but Mr. Markham. The government, +therefore, was taken completely and entirely +out of the hands of the person who had a legal right +to administer it,—out of the hands of his guardians,—out +of the hands of his mother,—out of the hands +of his nearest relations,—and, in short, of all those +who, in the common course of things, ought to have +been intrusted with it. From all such persons, I +say, it was taken: and where, my Lords, was it deposited? +Why, in the hands of a man of whom we +know nothing, and of whom we never heard anything, +before we heard that Mr. Markham, of his own +usurped authority, authorized by the usurped authority +of Mr. Hastings, without the least communication +with the Council, had put him in possession of that +country.</p> + +<p>Mr. Markham himself, as I have just said, administered +the revenues alone, without the smallest +authority for so doing, without the least knowledge +of the Council, till Jagher Deo Seo was appointed +Naib. Did he then give up his authority? No such +thing. All the measures of Jagher Deo Seo's government +were taken with the concurrence and joint +management of Mr. Markham. He conducted the +whole; the settlements were made, the leases and +agreements with farmers all regulated by him. I +need not tell you, I believe, that Jagher Deo Seo was +not a person of very much authority in the case: +your Lordships would laugh at me, if I said he was. +The revenue arrangements were, I firmly believe,<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_346" id="Page_346">{346}</a></span> +regulated and made by Mr. Markham. But whether +they were or were not, it comes to the same thing. +If they were improperly made and improperly conducted, +Mr. Hastings is responsible for the whole +of the mismanagement; for he gave the entire control +to a person who had little experience, who was +young in the world (and this is the excuse I wish +to make for a gentleman of that age). He appointed +him, and gave him at large a discretionary authority +to name whom he pleased to be the ostensible Naib; +but we know that he took the principal part himself +in all his settlements and in all his proceedings.</p> + +<p>Soon after the Naib had been thus appointed and +instructed by Mr. Markham, he settled, under his +directions, the administration of the country. Mr. +Markham then desires leave from Mr. Hastings to +go down to Calcutta. I imagine he never returned +to Benares; he comes to Europe; and here end the +acts of this viceroy and delegate.</p> + +<p>Let us now begin the reign of Mr. Benn and Mr. +Fowke. These gentlemen had just the same power +delegated to them that Mr. Markham possessed,—not +one jot less, that I know of; and they were therefore +responsible, and ought to have been called to +an account by Mr. Hastings for every part of their +proceedings. I will not give you my own account +of the reign of these gentlemen; but I will read to +you what Mr. Hastings has thought proper to represent +the state of the people to be under their government. +This course will save your Lordships time +and trouble; for it will nearly supersede all observations +of mine upon the subject. I hold in my hand +Mr. Hastings's representation of the effects produced +by a government which was conceived by himself, car<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_347" id="Page_347">{347}</a></span>ried +into effect by himself, and illegally invested by +him with illegal powers, without any security or +responsibility of any kind. Hear, I say, what an account +Mr. Hastings gave, when he afterwards went +up to Benares upon another wicked project, and +think what ought to have been his feelings as he +looked upon the ruin he had occasioned. Think of +the condition in which he saw Benares the first day +he entered it. He then saw it beautiful, ornamented, +rich,—an object that envy would have shed tears over +for its prosperity, that humanity would have beheld +with eyes glistening with joy for the comfort and +happiness which were there enjoyed by man: a country +flourishing in cultivation to such a degree that the +soldiers were obliged to march in single files through +the fields of corn, to avoid damaging them; a country +in which Mr. Stables has stated that the villages +were thick beyond all expression; a country where +the people pressed round their sovereign, as Mr. +Stables also told you, with joy, triumph, and satisfaction. +Such was the country; and in such a state +and under such a master was it, when he first saw +it. See what it now is under Warren Hastings; see +what it is under the British government; and then +judge whether the Commons are or are not right +in pressing the subject upon your Lordships for your +decision, and letting you and all this great auditory +know what sort of a criminal you have before you, +who has had the impudence to represent to your +Lordships at your bar that Benares is in a flourishing +condition, in defiance of the evidence which we have +under his own hands, and who, in all the false papers +that have been circulated to debauch the public +opinion, has stated that we, the Commons, have given<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_348" id="Page_348">{348}</a></span> +a false representation as to the state of the country +under the English government.</p> + +<div class="blockquote"> +<p class="center"><i>Lucknow, the 2d of April, 1784. Addressed to the +Honorable Edward Wheler, Esq., &c. Signed +Warren Hastings. It is in page 306 of the printed +Minutes.</i></p> + + +<p>"Gentlemen,—Having contrived, by making forced +stages, while the troops of my escort marched at the +ordinary rate, to make a stay of five days at Benares, +I was thereby furnished with the means of acquiring +some knowledge of the state of the province, which I +am anxious to communicate to you: indeed, the inquiry, +which was in a great degree obtruded upon +me, affected me with very mortifying reflections on +my own inability to apply it to any useful purpose.</p> + +<p>"From the confines of Buxar to Benares I was followed +and fatigued by the clamors of the discontented +inhabitants. It was what I expected in a degree, because +it is rare that the exercise of authority should +prove satisfactory to all who are the objects of it. +The distresses which were produced by the long continued +drought unavoidably tended to heighten the +general discontent; yet I have reason to fear that the +cause existed principally in a defective, if not a corrupt +and oppressive administration. Of a multitude +of petitions which were presented to me, and of which +I took minutes, every one that did not relate to a personal +grievance contained the representation of one +and the same species of oppression, which is in its +nature of an influence most fatal to the future cultivation. +The practice to which I allude is this. It is +affirmed that the aumils and renters exact from the +proprietors of the actual harvest a large increase in<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_349" id="Page_349">{349}</a></span> +kind on their stipulated rent: that is, from those who +hold their pottahs by the tenure of paying one half of +the produce of their crops, either the whole without +a subterfuge, or a large proportion of it by false measurement +or other pretexts; and from those whose +engagements are for a fixed rent in money the half +or a greater proportion is taken in kind. This is in +effect a tax upon the industry of the inhabitants; +since there is scarcely a field of grain in the province, +I might say not one, which has not been preserved by +the incessant labor of the cultivator, by digging wells +for their supply, or watering them from the wells of +masonry with which this country abounds, or from +the neighboring tanks, rivers, and nullahs. The people +who imposed on themselves this voluntary and +extraordinary labor, and not unattended with expense, +did it in the expectation of reaping the profits +of it; and it is certain that they would not have done +it, if they had known that their rulers, from whom +they were entitled to an indemnification, would take +from them what they had so hardly earned. If the +same administration continues, and the country shall +again labor under a want of the natural rains, every +field will be abandoned, the revenue fail, and thousands +perish, through the want of subsistence: for +who will labor for the sole benefit of others, and to +make himself the subject of vexation? These practices +are not to be imputed to the aumils employed +in the districts, but to the Naib himself. The avowed +principle on which he acts, and which he acknowledged +to myself, is, that the whole sum fixed for the +revenue of the province must be collected, and that +for this purpose the deficiency arising in places where +the crops have failed, or which have been left uncul<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_350" id="Page_350">{350}</a></span>tivated, +must be supplied from the resources of others, +where the soil has been better suited to the season, or +the industry of the cultivators more successfully exerted: +a principle which, however specious and plausible +it may at first appear, certainly tends to the most +pernicious and destructive consequences. If this +declaration of the Naib had been made only to myself, +I might have doubted my construction of it; but +it was repeated by him to Mr. Anderson, who understood +it exactly in the same sense. In the management +of the customs, the conduct of the Naib, or of +the officers under him, was forced also upon my attention. +The exorbitant rates exacted by an arbitrary +valuation of the goods, the practice of exacting duties +twice on the same goods, first from the seller and afterwards +from the buyer, and the vexatious disputes +and delays drawn on the merchants by these oppressions, +were loudly complained of; and some instances +of this kind were said to exist at the very time when +I was in Benares. Under such circumstances, we are +not to wonder, if the merchants of foreign countries +are discouraged from resorting to Benares, and if the +commerce of that province should annually decay.</p> + +<p>"Other evils, or imputed evils, have accidentally +come to my knowledge, which I will not now particularize, +as I hope that with the assistance of the Resident +they may be in part corrected: one, however, I +must mention, because it has been verified by my own +observation, and is of that kind which reflects an unmerited +reproach on our general and national character. +When I was at Buxar, the Resident at my desire +enjoined the Naib to appoint creditable people to every +town through which our route lay, to persuade and +encourage the inhabitants to remain in their houses,<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_351" id="Page_351">{351}</a></span> +promising to give them guards as I approached, and +they required it for their protection; and that he +might perceive how earnest I was for his observance +of this precaution, (which I am certain was faithfully +delivered,) I repeated it to him in person, and dismissed +him, that he might precede me for that purpose: +but, to my great disappointment, I found every +place through which I passed abandoned; nor had +there been a man left in any of them for their protection. +I am sorry to add, that, from Buxar to the +opposite boundary, I have seen nothing but the traces +of complete devastation in every village, whether +caused by the followers of the troops which have +lately passed, for their natural relief, (and I know +not whether my own may not have had their share,) +or from the apprehension of the inhabitants left to +themselves, and of themselves deserting their houses. +I wish to acquit my own countrymen of the blame of +these unfavorable appearances, and in my own heart +I do acquit them: for at one encampment, near a +large village called Derrara, in the purgunnah of Zemaneea, +a crowd of people came to me, complaining +that their former aumil, who was a native of the place, +and had long been established in authority over them, +and whose custom it had been, whenever any troops +passed, to remain in person on the spot for their protection, +having been removed, the new aumil, on the +approach of any military detachment, himself first +fled from the place, and the inhabitants, having no +one to whom they could apply for redress, or for the +representation of their grievances, and being thus remediless, +fled also; so that their houses and effects became +a prey to any person who chose to plunder them. +The general conclusion appeared to me an inevitable<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_352" id="Page_352">{352}</a></span> +consequence from such a state of facts,—and my own +senses bore testimony to it in this specific instance; +nor do I know how it is possible for any officer commanding +a military party, how attentive soever he +may be to the discipline and forbearance of his people, +to prevent disorders, when there is neither opposition +to hinder nor evidence to detect them. These +and many other irregularities I impute solely to the +Naib; and I think it my duty to recommend his instant +removal. I would myself have dismissed him, +had the control of this province come within the line +of my powers, and have established such regulations +and checks as would have been most likely to prevent +the like irregularities. I have said checks, because, +unless there is some visible influence, and a +powerful and able one, impended over the head of +the manager, no system can avail. The next appointed +may prove, from some defect, as unfit for the office +as the present; for the choice is limited to few, +without experience to guide it. The first was of +my own nomination; his merits and qualifications +stood in equal balance with my knowledge of those +who might have been the candidates for the office; +but he was the father of the Rajah, and the affinity +sunk the scale wholly in his favor: for who could be +so fit to be intrusted with the charge of his son's interest, +and the new credit of the rising family? He +deceived my expectations. Another was recommended +by the Resident, and at my instance the board +appointed him. This was Jagher Deo Seo, the +present Naib. I knew him not, and the other members +of the board as little. While Mr. Markham remained +in office, of whom, as his immediate patron, +he may have stood in awe, I am told that he re<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_353" id="Page_353">{353}</a></span>strained +his natural disposition, which has been described +to me as rapacious, unfeeling, haughty, and +to an extreme vindictive.</p> + +<p>"I cannot avoid remarking, that, excepting the +city of Benares itself, the province depending upon it +is in effect without a government, the Naib exercising +only a dependent jurisdiction without a principal. +The Rajah is without authority, and even his name +disused in the official instruments issued or taken +by the manager. The representation of his situation +shall be the subject of another letter; I have made +this already too long, and shall confine it to the single +subject for the communication of which it was begun. +This permit me to recapitulate. The administration +of the province is misconducted, and the people oppressed; +trade discouraged, and the revenue, though +said to be exceeded in the actual collections by +many lacs, (for I have a minute account of it, +which states the net amount, including jaghires, as +something more than fifty-one lacs,) in danger of a +rapid decline, from the violent appropriation of its +means; the Naib or manager is unfit for his office; +a new manager is required, and a system of official +control,—in a word, a constitution: for neither can +the board extend its superintending powers to a district +so remote from its observation, nor has it delegated +that authority to the Resident, who is merely +the representative of government, and the receiver +of its revenue in the last process of it; nor, indeed, +would it be possible to render him wholly so, for +reasons which I may hereafter detail."</p> +</div> + +<p>My Lords, you have now heard—not from the +Managers, not from records of office, not from <span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_354" id="Page_354">{354}</a></span>witnesses +at your bar, but from the prisoner himself—the +state of the country of Benares, from the time that +Mr. Hastings and his delegated Residents had taken +the management of it. My Lords, it is a proof, beyond +all other proof, of the melancholy state of the +country, in which, by attempting to exercise usurped +and arbitrary power, all power and all authority +become extinguished, complete anarchy takes place, +and nothing of government appears but the means of +robbing and ravaging, with an utter indisposition to +take one step for the protection of the people.</p> + +<p>Think, my Lords, what a triumphal progress it was +for a British governor, from one extremity of the province +to the other, (for so he has stated it,) to be pursued +by the cries of an oppressed and ruined people, +where they dared to appear before him,—and when +they did not dare to appear, flying from every place, +even the very magistrates being the first to fly! +Think, my Lords, that, when these unhappy people +saw the appearance of a British soldier, they fled as +from a pestilence; and then think, that these were +the people who labored in the manner which you have +just heard, who dug their own wells, whose country +would not produce anything but from the indefatigable +industry of its inhabitants; and that such a meritorious, +such an industrious people, should be subjected +to such a cursed anarchy under pretence of revenue, +to such a cursed tyranny under the pretence of +government!</p> + +<p>"But Jagher Deo Seo was unfit for his office."—"How +dared you to appoint a man unfit for his +office?"—"Oh, it signified little, without their having +a constitution."—"Why did you destroy the official +constitution that existed before? How dared you<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_355" id="Page_355">{355}</a></span> +to destroy those establishments which enabled the people +to dig wells and to cultivate the country like a +garden, and then to leave the whole in the hands of +your arbitrary and wicked Residents and their instruments, +chosen without the least idea of government +and without the least idea of protection?"</p> + +<p>God has sometimes converted wickedness into madness; +and it is to the credit of human reason, that +men who are not in some degree mad are never capable +of being in the highest degree wicked. The human +faculties and reason are in such cases deranged; +and therefore this man has been dragged by the just +vengeance of Providence to make his own madness +the discoverer of his own wicked, perfidious, and +cursed machinations in that devoted country.</p> + +<p>Think, my Lords, of what he says respecting the +military. He says there is no restraining them,—that +they pillage the country wherever they go. But +had not Mr. Hastings himself just before encouraged +the military to pillage the country? Did he not make +the people's resistance, when the soldiers attempted +to pillage them, one of the crimes of Cheyt Sing? +And who would dare to obstruct the military in their +abominable ravages, when they knew that one of the +articles of Cheyt Sing's impeachment was his having +suffered the people of the country, when plundered +by these wicked soldiers, to return injury for injury +and blow for blow? When they saw, I say, that these +were the things for which Cheyt Sing was sacrificed, +there was manifestly nothing left for them but flight.—What! +fly from a Governor-General? You would +expect he was bearing to the country, upon his +balmy and healing wings, the cure of all its disorders +and of all its distress. No: they knew him too well;<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_356" id="Page_356">{356}</a></span> +they knew him to be the destroyer of the country; +they knew him to be the destroyer of their sovereign, +the destroyer of the persons whom he had appointed +to govern under him; they knew that neither governor, +sub-governor, nor subject could enjoy a moment's +security while he possessed supreme power. +This was the state of the country; and this the +Commons of England call upon your Lordships to +avenge.</p> + +<p>Let us now see what is next done by the prisoner +at your bar. He is satisfied with simply removing +from his office Jagher Deo Seo, who is accused by him +of all these corruptions and oppressions. The other +poor, unfortunate man, who was not even accused of +malversations in such a degree, and against whom +not one of the accusations of oppression was regularly +proved, but who had, in Mr. Hastings's eye, the +one unpardonable fault of not having been made +richer by his crimes, was twice imprisoned, and finally +perished in prison. But we have never heard one +word of the imprisonment of Jagher Deo Seo, who, +I believe, after some mock inquiry, was acquitted.</p> + +<p>Here, my Lords, I must beg you to recollect Mr. +Hastings's proceeding with Gunga Govind Sing, and +to contrast his conduct towards these two peculators +with his proceeding towards Durbege Sing. Such a +comparison will let your Lordships into the secret of +one of the prisoner's motives of conduct upon such +occasions. When you will find a man pillaging and +desolating a country, in the manner Jagher Deo Seo +is described by Mr. Hastings to have done, but who +takes care to secure to himself the spoil, you will +likewise find that such a man is safe, secure, unpunished. +Your Lordships will recollect the desolation<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_357" id="Page_357">{357}</a></span> +of Dinagepore. You will recollect that the rapacious +Gunga Govind Sing, (the coadjutor of Mr. Hastings +in peculation,) out of 80,000<i>l.</i> which he had received +on the Company's account, retained 40,000<i>l.</i> for his +own use, and that, instead of being turned out of his +employment and treated with rigor and cruelty, he +was elevated in Mr. Hastings's grace and favor, and +never called upon for the restoration of a penny. +Observe, my Lords, the difference in his treatment +of men who have wealth to purchase impunity, or +who have secrets to reveal, and of another who has +no such merit, and is poor and insolvent.</p> + +<p>We have shown your Lordships the effects of Mr. +Hastings's government upon the country and its inhabitants; +and although I have before suggested to +you some of its effects upon the army of the Company, +I will now call your attention to a few other +observations on that subject. Your Lordships will, +in the first place, be pleased to attend to the character +which he gives of this army. You have heard +what he tells you of the state of the country in which +it was stationed, and of the terror which it struck +into the inhabitants. The appearance of an English +soldier was enough to strike the country people with +affright and dismay: they everywhere, he tells you, +fled before them. And yet they are the officers of +this very army who are brought here as witnesses to +express the general satisfaction of the people of India. +To be sure, a man who never calls Englishmen +to an account for any robbery or injury whatever, +who acquits them, upon their good intentions, without +any inquiry, will in return for this indemnity +have their good words. We are not surprised to find +them coming with emulation to your bar to declare<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_358" id="Page_358">{358}</a></span> +him possessed of all virtues, and that nobody has or can +have a right to complain of him. But we, my Lords, +protest against these indemnities; we protest against +their good words; we protest against their testimonials; +and we insist upon your Lordships trying him, +not upon what this or that officer says of his good +conduct, but upon the proved result of the actions +tried before you. Without ascribing, perhaps, much +guilt to men who must naturally wish to favor the +person who covers their excesses, who suffers their +fortunes to be made, you will know what value to set +upon their testimony. The Commons look on those +testimonies with the greatest slight, and they consider +as nothing all evidence given by persons who are +interested in the very cause,—persons who derive +their fortunes from the ruin of the very people of +the country, and who have divided the spoils with +the man whom we accuse. Undoubtedly these officers +will give him their good word. Undoubtedly +the Residents will give him their good word. Mr. +Markham, and Mr. Benn, and Mr. Fowke, if he had +been called, every servant of the Company, except +some few, will give him the same good word, every +one of them; because, my Lords, they have made +their fortunes under him, and their conduct has not +been inquired into.</p> + +<p>But to return to the observations we were making +upon the ruinous effects in general of the successive +governments which had been established at Benares +by the prisoner at your bar. These effects, he would +have you believe, arose from the want of a constitution. +Why, I again ask, did he destroy the constitution +which he found established there, or suffer it to +be destroyed? But he had actually authorized Mr.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_359" id="Page_359">{359}</a></span> +Markham to make a new, a regular, an official constitution. +Did Mr. Markham make it? No: though +he professed to do it; it never was done: and so far +from there being any regular, able, efficient constitution, +you see there was an absolute and complete anarchy +in the country. The native inhabitants, deprived +of their ancient government, were so far from +looking up to their new masters for protection, that, +the moment they saw the face of a soldier or of a +British person in authority, they fled in dismay, and +thought it more eligible to abandon their houses to +robbery than to remain exposed to the tyranny of a +British governor. Is this what they call British dominion? +Will you sanction by your judicial authority +transactions done in direct defiance of your legislative +authority? Are they so injuriously mad as to +suppose your Lordships can be corrupted to betray in +your judicial capacity (the most sacred of the two) +what you have ordained in your legislative character?</p> + +<p>My Lords, I am next to remind you what this man +has had the insolence and audacity to state at your +bar. "In fact," says he, "I can adduce very many +gentlemen now in London to confirm my assertions, +that the countries of Benares and Gazipore were never +within the memory of Englishmen so well protected, +so peaceably governed, or more industriously +cultivated than at the present moment."</p> + +<p>Your Lordships know that this report of Mr. Hastings +which has been read was made in the year 1784. +Your Lordships know that no step was taken, while +Mr. Hastings remained in India, for the regulation +and management of the country. If there was, let +it be shown. There was no constitution framed, nor<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_360" id="Page_360">{360}</a></span> +any other means taken for the settlement of the country, +except the appointment of Ajeet Sing in the room +of Durbege Sing, to reign like him, and like him to +be turned out. Mr. Hastings left India in February, +1785; he arrived here, as I believe, in June or July +following. Our proceedings against him commenced +in the sessions of 1786; and this defence was given, +I believe, in the year 1787. Yet at that time, when +he could hardly have received any account from India, +he was ready, he says, to produce the evidence +(and no doubt might have done so) of many gentlemen +whose depositions would have directly contradicted +what he had himself deposed of the state in +which he, so short a time before, had left the country. +Your Lordships cannot suppose that it could have +recovered its prosperity within that time. We know +you may destroy that in a day which will take up +years to build; we know a tyrant can in a moment +ruin and oppress: but you cannot restore the dead +to life; you cannot in a moment restore fields to cultivation; +you cannot, as you please, make the people +in a moment restore old or dig new wells: and yet +Mr. Hastings has dared to say to the Commons that +he would produce persons to refute the account which +we had fresh from himself. We will, however, undertake +to show you that the direct contrary was the +fact.</p> + +<p>I will first refer you to Mr. Barlow's account of +the state of trade. Your Lordships will there find a +full exposure of the total falsehood of the prisoner's +assertions. You will find that Mr. Hastings himself +had been obliged to give orders for the change +of almost every one of the regulations he had made. +Your Lordships may there see the madness and folly<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_361" id="Page_361">{361}</a></span> +of tyranny attempting to regulate trade. In the printed +Minutes, page 2830, your Lordships will see how +completely Mr. Hastings had ruined the trade of the +country. You will find, that, wherever he pretended +to redress the grievances which he had occasioned, +he did not take care to have any one part of his pretended +redress executed. When you consider the anarchy +in which he states the country through which +he passed to have been, you may easily conceive that +regulations for the protection of trade, without the +means of enforcing them, must be nugatory.</p> + +<p>Mr. Barlow was sent, in the years 1786 and 1787, +to examine into the state of the country. He has +stated the effect of all those regulations, which Mr. +Hastings has had the assurance to represent here as +prodigies of wisdom. At the very time when our +charge was brought to this House, (it is a remarkable +period, and we desire your Lordships to advert to it,) +at that time, I do not know whether it was not on the +very same day that we brought our charge to your +bar, Mr. Duncan was sent by Lord Cornwallis to +examine into the state of that province. Now, my +Lords, you have Mr. Duncan's report before you, and +you will judge whether or not, by any regulation +which Mr. Hastings had made, or whether through +<i>any</i> means used by him, that country had recovered +or was recovering. Your Lordships will there find +other proofs of the audacious falsehood of his representation, +that all which he had done had operated on +the minds of the inhabitants very greatly in favor of +British integrity and good government. Mr. Duncan's +report will not only enable you to decide upon +what he has said himself, it will likewise enable you +to judge of the credit which is due to the gentlemen<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_362" id="Page_362">{362}</a></span> +now in London whom he can produce to confirm his +assertions, that the country of Benares and Gazipore +were never, within the memory of Englishmen, so +well protected and cultivated as at the present moment.</p> + +<p>Instead, therefore, of a speech from me, you shall +hear what the country says itself, by the report of the +last commissioner who was sent to examine it by Lord +Cornwallis. The perfect credibility of his testimony +Mr. Hastings has established out of Lord Cornwallis's +mouth, who, being asked the character of Mr. Jonathan +Duncan, has declared that there is nothing he can +report of the state of the country to which you ought +not to give credit. Your Lordships will now see how +deep the wounds are which tyranny and arbitrary +power must make in a country where their existence +is suffered; and you will be pleased to observe that +this statement was made at a time when Mr. Hastings +was amusing us with <i>his</i> account of Benares.</p> + +<div class="blockquote"> +<p class="center"><i>Extract of the Proceedings of the Resident at Benares, +under date the 16th February, 1788, at the Purgunnah +of Gurrah Dehmah, &c. Printed Minutes, page +2610.</i></p> + +<p>"The Resident, having arrived in this purgunnah +of Gurrah Dehmah from that of Mohammedabad, is +very sorry to observe that it seems about one third +at least uncultivated, owing to the mismanagement +of the few last years. The Rajah, however, promises +that it shall be by next year in a complete state of +cultivation; and Tobarck Hossaine, his aumeen, aumil, +or agent, professes his confidence of the same +happy effects, saying, that he has already brought a +great proportion of the land, that lay fallow when he<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_363" id="Page_363">{363}</a></span> +came into the purgunnah in the beginning of the +year, into cultivation, and that, it being equally the +Rajah's directions and his own wish, he does not +doubt of being successful in regard to the remaining +part of the waste land."</p> + + +<p class="center"><i>Report, dated the 18th of February, at the Purgunnah +of Bulleah.</i></p> + +<p>"The Resident, having come yesterday into this +purgunnah from that of Gurrah Dehmah, finds its +appearance much superior to that purgunnah in point +of cultivation; yet it is on the decline so for that its +collectible jumma will not be so much this year as +it was last, notwithstanding all the efforts of Reazel +Husn, the agent of Khulb Ali Khân, who has farmed +this purgunnah upon a three years' lease, (of which +the present is the last,) during which his, that is, the +head farmer's, management cannot be applauded, as +the funds of the purgunnah are very considerably declined +in his hands: indeed, Reazel Husn declares +that this year there was little or no <i>khereef</i>, or first +harvest, in the purgunnah, and that it has been +merely by the greatest exertions that he has prevailed +on the ryots to cultivate the <i>rubby</i> crop, which is now +on the ground and seems plentiful."</p> + + +<p class="center"><i>Report, dated the 20th of February, at the Purgunnah +of Khereed.</i></p> + +<p>"The Resident, having this day come into the purgunnah +of Khereed, finds that part of it laying between +the frontiers of Bulleah, the present station, +and Bansdeah, (which is one of the <i>tuppahs</i>, or subdivisions, +of Khereed,) exceedingly wasted and uncultivated. +The said tuppah is sub-farmed by Gobind<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_364" id="Page_364">{364}</a></span> +Ram from Kulub Ali Bey, and Gobind Ram has again +under-rented it to the zemindars."</p> + + +<p class="center"><i>Report, dated the 23d February, at the Purgunnah of +Sekunderpoor.</i></p> + +<p>"The Resident is set out for Sekunderpoor, and is +sorry to observe, that, for about six or seven coss that +he had further to pass through the purgunnah of Kereebs, +the whole appeared one continued waste, as far +as the eye could reach, on both sides of the road. +The purgunnah Sekunderpoor, beginning about a +coss before he reached the village, an old fort of that +name, appeared to a little more advantage; but even +here the crops seem very scanty, and the ground more +than half fallow."</p> + + +<p class="center"><i>Extract of the Proceedings of the Resident at Benares, +under date the 26th February, at the Purgunnah of +Sekunderpoor.</i></p> + +<p>"The Resident now leaves Sekunderpoor to proceed +to Nurgurah, the head cutchery of the purgunnah. +He is sorry to observe, that, during the whole +way between these two places, which are at the distance +of six coss, or twelve miles, from each other, not +above twenty fields of cultivated ground are to be +seen; all the rest being, as far as the eye can reach, +except just in the vicinity of Nuggeha, one general +waste of long grass, with here and there some straggling +jungly trees. This falling off in the cultivation +is said to have happened in the course of but a few +years,—that is, since the late Rajah's expulsion."</p> +</div> + +<p>Your Lordships will observe, the date of the ruin +of this country is the expulsion of Cheyt Sing.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_365" id="Page_365">{365}</a></span></p> + +<div class="blockquote"> +<p class="center"><i>Extract of the Proceedings of the Resident at Benares, +under date the 27th February, at the Purgunnah +Sekunderpoor.</i></p> + +<p>"The Resident meant to have proceeded from this +place to Cossimabad; but understanding that the village +of Ressenda, the capital of the purgunnah of +Susknesser, is situated at three coss' distance, and +that many <i>rahdarry</i> collections are there exacted, +the zemindars and ryots being, it seems, all one body +of Rajpoots, who affect to hold themselves in some +sort independent of the Rajah's government, paying +only a <i>mokurrery</i>, or fixed jumma, (which it may +be supposed is not overrated,) and managing their +interior concerns as they think fit, the Resident +thought it proper on this report to deviate a little +from his intended route, by proceeding this day to +Ressenda, where he accordingly arrived in the afternoon; +and the remaining part of the country near +the road through Sekunderpoor, from Nuggurha to +Seundah, appearing nearly equally waste with the +former part, as already noticed in the proceedings +of the 26th instant.</p> + +<p>"The Rajah is therefore desired to appoint a person +to bring those waste lands into cultivation, in like +manner as he has done in Khereed, with this difference +or addition in his instructions,—that he subjoin +in those to the Aband Kar, or manager, of the +re-cultivation of Sekunderpoor, the rates at which he +is authorized to grant pottahs for the various kinds +of land; and it is recommended to him to make +these rates even somewhat lower than he may himself +think strictly conformable to justice, reporting +the particulars to the Resident.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_366" id="Page_366">{366}</a></span></p> + +<p>"The Rajah is also desired to prepare and transmit +a table of similar rates to the Aband Kar of purgunnah +Khereed.</p> + +<p> +<span style="margin-left: 8em;">(Signed) "JON<sup>N</sup> DUNCAN, <i>Resident</i>.<br /></span> +"BENARES, the 12th September, 1788."<br /> +</p> +</div> + +<p>Here your Lordships find, in spite of Mr. Hastings +himself, in spite of all the testimonies which he has +called, and of all the other testimonies which he +would have called, that his own account of the matter +is confirmed against his own pretended evidence; you +find his own written account confirmed in a manner +not to be doubted: and the only difference between +his account and this is, that the people did not fly +from Mr. Duncan, when he approached, as they fled +from Mr. Hastings. They did not feel any of that +terror at the approach of a person from the beneficent +government of Lord Cornwallis with which they +had been entirely filled at the appearance of the prisoner +at your bar. From him they fled in dismay. +They fled from his very presence, as from a consuming +pestilence, as from something far worse than +drought and famine; they fled from him as a cruel, +corrupt, and arbitrary governor, which is worse than +any other evil that ever afflicted mankind.</p> + +<p>You see, my Lords, in what manner the country +has been wasted and destroyed; and you have seen, +by the date of these measures, that they have happened +within a few years, namely, since the expulsion +of Rajah Cheyt Sing. There begins the era of +calamity. Ask yourselves, then, whether you will or +can countenance the acts which led directly and necessarily +to such consequences. Your Lordships will +mark what it is to oppress and expel a cherished in<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_367" id="Page_367">{367}</a></span>dividual +from his government, and finally to subvert +it. Nothing stands after him; down go all order +and authority with him; ruin and desolation fall +upon the country; the fields are uncultivated, the +wells are dried up. The people, says Mr. Duncan, +promised, indeed, some time or other, under some +other government, to do something. They will +again cultivate the lands, when they can get an assurance +of security. My Lords, judge, I pray you, +whether the House of Commons, when they had read +the account which Mr. Hastings has himself given of +the dreadful consequences of his proceedings, when +they had read the account given by Mr. Duncan of an +uncultivated country as far as the eye could reach, +would not have shown themselves unworthy to represent +not only the Commons of Great Britain, but +the meanest village in it, if they had not brought +this great criminal before you, and called upon your +Lordships to punish him. This ruined country, its +desolate fields and its undone inhabitants, all call +aloud for British justice, all call for vengeance upon +the head of this execrable criminal.</p> + +<p>Oh! but we ought to be tender towards his personal +character,—extremely cautious in our speech; +we ought not to let indignation loose.—My Lords, +we do let our indignation loose; we cannot bear with +patience this affliction of mankind. We will neither +abate our energy, relax in our feelings, nor in the +expressions which those feelings dictate. Nothing +but corruption like his own could enable any man +to see such a scene of desolation and ruin unmoved. +We feel pity for the works of God and man; we feel +horror for the debasement of human nature; and +feeling thus, we give a loose to our indignation, and +call upon your Lordships for justice.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_368" id="Page_368">{368}</a></span></p> + +<p>Strange as it may appear to your Lordships, there +remains to be stated an aggravation of his crimes, +and of his victims' misery. Would you consider it +possible, my Lords, that there could be an aggravation +of such a case as you have heard? Would you +think it possible for a people to suffer more than the +inhabitants of Benares have suffered, from the noble +possessor of the splendid mansion down to the miserable +tenants of the cottage and the hut? Yes, +there is a state of misery, a state of degradation, far +below all that you have yet heard. It is, my Lords, +that these miserable people should come to your +Lordships' bar, and declare that they have never +felt one of those grievances of which they complain; +that not one of those petitions with which they pursued +Mr. Hastings had a word of truth in it; that +they felt nothing under his government but ease, +tranquillity, joy, and happiness; that every day during +his government was a festival, and every night +an illumination and rejoicing. The addresses which +contain these expressions of satisfaction have been +produced at your bar, and have been read to your +Lordships. You must have heard with disgust, at +least, these flowers of Oriental rhetoric, penned at +ease by dirty hireling moonshees at Calcutta, who +make these people put their seals, not to declarations +of their ruin, but to expressions of their satisfaction. +You have heard what he himself says of the country; +you have heard what Mr. Duncan says of it; you +have heard the cries of the country itself calling for +justice upon him: and now, my Lords, hear what +he has made these people say. "We have heard +that the gentlemen in England are displeased with +Mr. Hastings, on suspicion that he oppressed us, the<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_369" id="Page_369">{369}</a></span> +inhabitants of this place, took our money by deceit +and force, and ruined the country." They then declare +solemnly before God, according to their different +religions, that Mr. Hastings "distributed protection +and security to religion, and kindness and +peace to all. He is free," say they, "from the charge +of embezzlement and fraud, and his heart is void +of covetousness and avidity. During the period of +his government no one ever experienced from him +other than protection and justice, never having felt +hardships from him; nor did the poor ever know +the weight of an oppressive hand from him. Our +characters and reputation have been always guarded +in quiet from attack, by the vigilance of his prudence +and foresight, and by the terror of his justice."</p> + +<p>Upon my word, my Lords, the paragraphs are delightful. +Observe, in this translation from the Persian +there is all the fluency of an English paragraph +well preserved. All I can say is, that these people +of Benares feel their joy, comfort, and satisfaction +in swearing to the falseness of Mr. Hastings's representation +against himself. In spite of his own testimony, +they say, "He secured happiness and joy to +us; he reëstablished the foundation of justice; and +we at all times, during his government, lived in comfort +and passed our days in peace." The shame of +England and of the English government is here put +upon your Lordships' records. Here you have, just +following that afflicting report of Mr. Duncan's, and +that account of Mr. Hastings himself, in which he +said the inhabitants fled before his face, the addresses +of these miserable people. He dares to impose upon +your eyesight, upon your common sense, upon the +plain faculties of mankind. He dares, in contra<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_370" id="Page_370">{370}</a></span>diction +to all his own assertions, to make these +people come forward and swear that they have enjoyed +nothing but complete satisfaction and pleasure +during the whole time of his government.</p> + +<p>My Lords, I have done with this business, for I +have now reached the climax of degradation and +suffering, after moving step by step through the +several stages of tyranny and oppression. I have +done with it, and have only to ask, In what country +do we live, where such a scene can by any possibility +be offered to the public eye?</p> + +<p>Let us here, my Lords, make a pause.—You have +seen what Benares was under its native government. +You have seen the condition in which it was left +by Cheyt Sing, and you have seen the state in which +Mr. Hastings left it. The rankling wounds which +he has inflicted upon the country, and the degradation +to which the inhabitants have been subjected, +have been shown to your Lordships. You have now +to consider whether or not you will fortify with your +sanction any of the detestable principles upon which +the prisoner justifies his enormities.</p> + +<p>My Lords, we shall next come to another dependent +province, when I shall illustrate to your Lordships +still further the effects of Mr. Hastings's principles. +I allude to the province of Oude,—a country +which, before our acquaintance with it, was in the +same happy and flourishing condition with Benares, +and which dates its period of decline and misery from +the time of our intermeddling with it. The Nabob +of Oude was reduced, as Cheyt Sing was, to be a +dependant on the Company, and to be a greater +dependant than Cheyt Sing, because it was reserved +in Cheyt Sing's agreement that we should not in<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_371" id="Page_371">{371}</a></span>terfere +in his government. We interfered in every +part of the Nabob's government; we reduced his +authority to nothing; we introduced a perfect scene +of anarchy and confusion into the country, where +there was no authority but to rob and destroy.</p> + +<p>I have not strength at present to proceed; but +I hope I shall soon be enabled to do so. Your +Lordships cannot, I am sure, calculate from your +own youth and strength; for I have done the best +I can, and find myself incapable just at this moment +of going any further.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_372" id="Page_372">{372}</a></span></p> + + + +<hr style="width: 65%;" /> +<h2><a name="FOURTH_DAY_THURSDAY_JUNE_5_1794" id="FOURTH_DAY_THURSDAY_JUNE_5_1794"></a>SPEECH<br /> +<br /> +<span style="font-size: 50%;">IN</span><br /> +<br /> +GENERAL REPLY.<br /> +<br /> +<span style="font-size: 50%;">FOURTH DAY: THURSDAY, JUNE 5, 1794.</span></h2> + + +<p>My Lords,—When I last had the honor of +addressing your Lordships from this place, my +want of strength obliged me to conclude where the +patience of a people and the prosperity of a country +subjected by solemn treaties to British government +had concluded. We have left behind us the inhabitants +of Benares, after having seen them driven into +rebellion by tyranny and oppression, and their country +desolated by our misrule. Your Lordships, I am sure, +have had the map of India before you, and know that +the country so destroyed and so desolated was about +one fifth of the size of England and Wales in geographical +extent, and equal in population to about a +fourth. Upon this scale you will judge of the mischief +which has been done.</p> + +<p>My Lords, we are now come to another devoted +province: we march from desolation to desolation; +because we follow the steps of Warren Hastings, +Esquire, Governor-General of Bengal. You will here +find the range of his atrocities widely extended; but +before I enter into a detail of them, I have one reflection +to make, which I beseech your Lordships to bear +in mind throughout the whole of this deliberation. +It is this: you ought never to conclude that a man<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_373" id="Page_373">{373}</a></span> +must necessarily be innoxious because he is in other +respects insignificant. You will see that a man +bred in obscure, vulgar, and ignoble occupations, and +trained in sordid, base, and mercenary habits, is not +incapable of doing extensive mischief, because he is +little, and because his vices are of a mean nature. +My Lords, we have shown to you already, and we +shall demonstrate to you more clearly in future, that +such minds placed in authority can do more mischief +to a country, can treat all ranks and distinctions with +more pride, insolence, and arrogance, than those who +have been born under canopies of state and swaddled +in purple: you will see that they can waste a country +more effectually than the proudest and most mighty +conquerors, who, by the greatness of their military +talents, have first subdued and afterwards plundered +nations.</p> + +<p>The prisoner's counsel have thought proper to +entertain your Lordships, and to defend their client, +by comparing him with the men who are said to have +erected a pyramid of ninety thousand human heads. +Now look back, my Lords, to Benares; consider the +extent of country laid waste and desolated, and its +immense population; and then see whether famine +may not destroy as well as the sword, and whether +this man is not as well entitled to erect his pyramid +of ninety thousand heads as any terrific tyrant of the +East. We follow him now to another theatre, the +territories of the Nabob of Oude.</p> + +<p>My Lords, Oude, (together with the additions made +to it by Sujah Dowlah,) in point of geographical extent, +is about the size of England. Sujah Dowlah, +who possessed this country as Nabob, was a prince of +a haughty character,—ferocious in a high degree to<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_374" id="Page_374">{374}</a></span>wards +his enemies, and towards all those who resisted +his will. He was magnificent in his expenses, yet +economical with regard to his resources,—maintaining +his court in a pomp and splendor which is perhaps +unknown to the sovereigns of Europe. At the +same time he was such an economist, that from an inconsiderable +revenue, at the beginning of his reign, +he was annually enabled to make great savings. He +thus preserved, towards the end of it, his people in +peace, tranquillity, and order; and though he was +an arbitrary prince, he never strained his revenue to +such a degree as to lose their affections while he filled +his exchequer. Such appears to have been the true +character of Sujah Dowlah: your Lordships have +heard what is the character which the prisoner at +your bar and his counsel have thought proper to give +you of him.</p> + +<p>Surely, my Lords, the situation of the great, as +well as of the lower ranks in that country, must be a +subject of melancholy reflection to every man. Your +Lordships' compassion will, I presume, lead you to +feel for the lowest; and I hope that your sympathetic +dignity will make you consider in what manner the +princes of this country are treated. They have not +only been treated at your Lordships' bar with indignity +by the prisoner, but his counsel do not leave their +ancestors to rest quietly in their graves. They have +slandered their families, and have gone into scandalous +history that has no foundation in facts whatever.</p> + +<p>Your Lordships have seen how he attempted to slander +the ancestors of Cheyt Sing, to deny that they +were zemindars; and yet he must have known from +printed books, taken from the Company's records,<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_375" id="Page_375">{375}</a></span> +the utter falsity of his declaration. You need only +look into Mr. Verelst's Appendix, and there you will +see that that country has always been called the Zemindary +of Bulwant Sing. You will find him always +called the Zemindar; it was the known, acknowledged +name, till this gentleman thought proper at +the bar of the House of Commons to deny that he was +a zemindar, and to assert that he was only an aumil. +He slanders the pedigree of this man as mean and +base, yet he was not ashamed to take from him +twenty-three thousand pounds. In like manner he +takes from Asoph ul Dowlah a hundred thousand +pounds, which he would have appropriated to himself, +and then directs his counsel to rake up the slander +of Dow's History, a book of no authority, a book +that no man values in any respect or degree. In +this book they find that romantic, absurd, and ridiculous +story upon which an honorable fellow Manager +of mine, who is much more capable than I am of +doing justice to the subject, has commented with his +usual ability: I allude to that story of spitting on the +beard,—the mutual compact to poison one another. +That Arabian tale, fit only to form a ridiculous tragedy, +has been gravely mentioned to your Lordships +for the purpose of slandering the pedigree of this +Vizier of Oude, and making him vile in your Lordships' +eyes. My honorable friend has exposed to you +the absurdity of these stories, but he has not shown +you the malice of their propagators. The prisoner +and his counsel have referred to Dow's History, who +calls this Nabob "the more infamous son of an infamous +Persian peddler." They wish that your Lordships +should consider him as a person vilely born, ignominiously +educated, and practising a mean trade,<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_376" id="Page_376">{376}</a></span> +in order that, when it shall be proved that he and +his family were treated with every kind of indignity +and contempt by the prisoner at your bar, the sympathy +of mankind should be weakened. Consider, my +Lords, the monstrous perfidy and ingratitude of this +man, who, after receiving great favors from the Nabob, +is not satisfied with oppressing his offspring, +but goes back to his ancestors, tears them out of their +graves, and vilifies them with slanderous aspersions. +My Lords, the ancestor of Sujah Dowlah was a great +prince,—certainly a subordinate prince, because he +was a servant of the Great Mogul, who was well +called King of Kings, for he had in his service persons +of high degree. He was born in Persia; but +was not, as is falsely said, <i>the more infamous son of an +infamous Persian peddler</i>. Your Lordships are not +unacquainted with the state and history of India; +you therefore know that Persia has been the nursery +of all the Mahometan nobility of India: almost everything +in that country which is not of Gentoo origin +is of Persian; so much so, that the Persian language +is the language of the court, and of every office from +the highest to the lowest. Among these noble Persians, +the family of the Nabob stands in the highest +degree. His father's ancestors were of noble descent, +and those of his mother, Munny Begum, more eminently +and more illustriously so. This distinguished +family, on no better authority than that of the historian +Dow, has been slandered by the prisoner at your +bar, in order to destroy the character of those whom +he had already robbed of their substance. Your +Lordships will have observed with disgust how the +Dows and the Hastings, and the whole of that tribe, +treat their superiors,—in what insolent language<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_377" id="Page_377">{377}</a></span> +they speak of them, and with what pride and indignity +they trample upon the first names and the first +characters in that devoted country.</p> + +<p>But supposing it perfectly true that this man was +"the more infamous son of an infamous Persian +peddler," he had risen to be the secondary sovereign +of that country. He had a revenue of three millions +six hundred thousand pounds sterling: a vast and +immense revenue; equal, perhaps, to the clear revenue +of the King of England. He maintained an army +of one hundred and twenty thousand men. He +had a splendid court; and his country was prosperous +and happy. Such was the situation of Sujah +Dowlah, the Nabob of Oude, and such the condition +of Oude under his government. With his pedigree, +I believe, your Lordships will think we have nothing +to do in the cause now before us. It has been +pressed upon us; and this marks the indecency, the +rancor, the insolence, the pride and tyranny which +the Dows and the Hastings, and the people of that +class and character, are in the habit of exercising +over the great in India.</p> + +<p>My Lords, I shall be saved a great deal of trouble +in proving to you the flourishing state of Oude, because +the prisoner admits it as largely as I could wish +to state it; and what is more, he admits, too, the +truth of our statement of the condition to which it is +now reduced,—but I shall not let him off so easily +upon this point. He admits, too, that it was left in +this reduced and ruined state at the close of his administration. +In his Defence he attributes the whole +mischief generally to a faulty system of government. +My Lords, systems never make mankind happy or +unhappy, any further than as they give occasions for<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_378" id="Page_378">{378}</a></span> +wicked men to exercise their own abominable talents, +subservient to their own more abominable dispositions. +"The system," says Mr. Hastings, "was bad; +but I was not the maker of it." Your Lordships +have seen him apply this mode of reasoning to Benares, +and you will now see that he applies it to Oude. +"I came," says he, "into a bad system; that system +was not of my making, but I was obliged to act according +to the spirit of it."</p> + +<p>Now every honest man would say,—"I came to a +bad system: I had every facility of abusing my power, +I had every temptation to peculate, I had every +incitement to oppress, I had every means of concealment, +by the defects of the system; but I corrected +that evil system by the goodness of my administration, +by the prudence, the energy, the virtue of my +conduct." This is what all the rest of the world +would say: but what says Mr. Hastings? "A bad +system was made to my hands; I had nothing to do +in making it. I was altogether an involuntary instrument, +and obliged to execute every evil which +that system contained." This is the line of conduct +your Lordships are called to decide upon. And I +must here again remind you that we are at an issue +of law. Mr. Hastings has avowed a certain set of +principles upon which he acts; and your Lordships +are therefore to judge whether his acts are justifiable +because he found an evil system to act upon, or +whether he and all governors upon earth have not a +general good system upon which they ought to act.</p> + +<p>The prisoner tells you, my Lords, that it was in +consequence of this evil system, that the Nabob, from +being a powerful prince, became reduced to a wretched +dependant on the Company, and subject to all the<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_379" id="Page_379">{379}</a></span> +evils of that degraded state,—subject to extortion, +to indignity, to oppression. All these your Lordships +are called upon to sanction; and because they may +be connected with an existing system, you are to declare +them to be an allowable part of a code for the +government of British India.</p> + +<p>In the year 1775, that powerful, magnificent, and +illustrious prince, Sujah Dowlah, died in possession of +the country of Oude. He had long governed a happy +and contented people, and, if we except the portion +of tyranny which we admit he really did exercise towards +some few individuals who resisted his power, +he was a wise and beneficent governor. This prince +died in the midst of his power and fortune, leaving +somewhere about fourscore children. Your Lordships +know that the princes of the East have a great +number of wives; and we know that these women, +though reputed of a secondary rank, are yet of a +very high degree, and honorably maintained according +to the customs of the East. Sujah Dowlah had +but one lawful wife: he had by her but one lawful +child, Asoph ul Dowlah. He had about twenty-one +male children, the eldest of whom was a person +whom you have heard of very often in these proceedings, +called Saadut Ali. Asoph ul Dowlah, being the +sole legitimate son, had all the pretensions to succeed +his father, as Subahdar of Oude, which could belong +to any person under the Mogul government.</p> + +<p>Your Lordships will distinguish between a Zemindar, +who is a perpetual landholder, the hereditary proprietor +of an estate, and a Subahdar, who derives from +his master's will and pleasure all his employments, +and who, instead of having the jaghiredars subject +to his supposed arbitrary will, is himself a subject,<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_380" id="Page_380">{380}</a></span> +and must have his sovereign's patent for his place. +Therefore, strictly and properly speaking, there is no +succession in the office of Subahdar. At this time the +Company, who alone could obtain the <i>sunnuds</i> [<i>sunnud?</i>], +or patent, from the Great Mogul, upon account +of the power they possessed in India, thought, and +thought rightly, that with an officer who had no hereditary +power there could be no hereditary engagements,—and +that in their treaty with Asoph ul Dowlah, +for whom they had procured the sunnud from the +Great Mogul, they were at liberty to propose their own +terms, which, if honorable and mutually advantageous +to the new Subahdar and to the Company, they had +a right to insist upon. A treaty was therefore concluded +between the Company and Asoph ul Dowlah, +in which the latter stipulated to pay a fixed subsidy +for the maintenance of a certain number of troops, by +which the Company's finances were greatly relieved +and their military strength greatly increased.</p> + +<p>This treaty did not contain one word which could +justify any interference in the Nabob's government. +That evil system, as Mr. Hastings calls it, is not even +mentioned or alluded to; nor is there, I again say, +one word which authorized Warren Hastings, or any +other person whatever, to interfere in the interior +affairs of his country. He was legally constituted +Viceroy of Oude; his dignity of Vizier of the Empire, +with all the power which that office gave him, +derived from and held under the Mogul government, +he legally possessed; and this evil system, which Mr. +Hastings says led him to commit the enormities of +which you shall hear by-and-by, was neither more +nor less than what I have now stated.</p> + +<p>But, my Lords, the prisoner thinks, that, when,<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_381" id="Page_381">{381}</a></span> +under any pretence, any sort of means could be furnished +of interfering in the government of the country, +he has a right to avail himself of them, to use +them at his pleasure, and to govern by his own arbitrary +will. The Vizier, he says, by this treaty was +reduced to a state of vassalage; and he makes this +curious distinction in proof of it. It was, he says, an +optional vassalage: for, if he chose to get rid of our +troops, he might do so and be free; if he had not a +mind to do that, and found a benefit in it, then he +was a vassal. But there is nothing less true. Here +is a person who keeps a subsidiary body of your +troops, which he is to pay for you; and in consequence +of this Mr. Hastings maintains that he +becomes a vassal. I shall not dispute whether vassalage +is optional or by force, or in what way Mr. +Hastings considered this prince as a vassal of the +Company. Let it be as he pleased. I only think it +necessary that your Lordships should truly know the +actual state of that country, and the ground upon +which Mr. Hastings stood. Your Lordships will find +it a fairy land, in which there is a perpetual masquerade, +where no one thing appears as it really is,—where +the person who seems to have the authority +is a slave, while the person who seems to be the slave +has the authority. In that ambiguous government +everything favors fraud, everything favors peculation, +everything favors violence, everything favors concealment. +You will therefore permit me to show to you +what were the principles upon which Mr. Hastings +appears, according to the evidence before you, to have +acted,—what the state of the country was, according +to his conceptions of it; and then you will see how +he applied those principles to that state.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_382" id="Page_382">{382}</a></span></p> + +<p>"The means by which our government acquired +this influence," says Mr. Hastings, "and its right +to exercise it, will require a previous explanation." +He then proceeds,—"With his death [Sujah Dowlah's] +a new political system commenced, and Mr. +Bristow was constituted the instrument of its formation, +and the trustee for the management of it. The +Nabob Asoph ul Dowlah was deprived of a large part +of his inheritance,—I mean the province of Benares, +attached by a very feeble and precarious tenure to +our dominions; the army fixed to a permanent station +in a remote line of his frontier, with an augmented +and perpetual subsidy; a new army, amphibiously +composed of troops in his service and pay, +commanded by English officers of our own nomination, +for the defence of his new conquests; and his +own natural troops annihilated, or alienated by the +insufficiency of his revenue for all his disbursements, +and the prior claims of those which our authority +or influence commanded: in a word, he became a +vassal of the government; but he still possessed an +ostensible sovereignty. His titular rank of Vizier +of the Empire rendered him a conspicuous object of +view to all the states and chiefs of India; and on the +moderation and justice with which the British government +in Bengal exercised its influence over him +many points most essential to its political strength +and to the honor of the British name depended."</p> + +<p>Your Lordships see that the system which is supposed +to have reduced him to vassalage did not make, +as he contends, a violent exercise of our power necessary +or proper; but possessing, as the Nabob did, +that high nominal dignity, and being in that state of +vassalage, as Mr. Hastings thought proper to term it,<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_383" id="Page_383">{383}</a></span> +though there is no vassalage mentioned in the treaty,—being, +I say, in that situation of honor, credit, +and character, sovereign of a country as large as +England, yielding an immense revenue, and flourishing +in trade, certainly our honor depended upon the +use we made of that influence which our power gave +us over him; and we therefore press it upon your +Lordships, that the conduct of Mr. Hastings was such +as dishonored this nation.</p> + +<p>He proceeds,—"This is not a place, nor have I +room in it, to prove, what I shall here content myself +with affirming, that, by a sacred and undeviating observance +of every principle of public faith, the British +dominion might have by this time acquired the +means of its extension, through a virtual submission +to its authority, to every region of Hindostan and +Deccan. I am not sure that I should advise such a +design, were it practicable, which at this time it certainly +is not; and I very much fear that the limited +formation of such equal alliances as might be useful +to our present condition, and conduce to its improvement, +is become liable to almost insurmountable difficulties: +every power in India must wish for the support +of ours, but they all dread the connection. The +subjection of Bengal, and the deprivation of the family +of Jaffier Ali Khân, though an effect of inevitable +necessity, the present usurpations of the rights +of the Nabob Wallau Jau in the Carnatic, and the licentious +violations of the treaty existing between the +Company and the Nabob Nizam ul Dowlah, though +checked by the remedial interposition of this government, +stand as terrible precedents against us; the +effects of our connection with the Nabob Asoph ul +Dowlah had a rapid tendency to the same conse<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_384" id="Page_384">{384}</a></span>quences, +and it has been my invariable study to prevent +it."</p> + +<p>Your Lordships will remember that the counsel at +the bar have said that they undertook the defence of +Warren Hastings, not in order to defend him, but to +rescue the British character from the imputations +which have been laid upon it by the Commons of +Great Britain. They have said that the Commons of +Great Britain have slandered their country, and have +misrepresented its character; while, on the contrary, +the servants of the Company have sustained and +maintained the dignity of the English character, have +kept its public faith inviolate, preserved the people +from oppression, reconciled every government to it in +India, and have made every person under it prosperous +and happy.</p> + +<p>My Lords, you see what this man says himself, +when endeavoring to prove his own innocence. Instead +of proving it by the facts alleged by his counsel, +he declares that by preserving good faith you +might have conquered India, the most glorious conquest +that was ever made in the world; that all +the people want our assistance, but dread our connection. +Why? Because our whole conduct has +been one perpetual tissue of perfidy and breach of +faith with every person who has been in alliance +with us, in any mode whatever. Here is the man +himself who says it. Can we bear that this man +should now stand up in this place as the assertor +of the honor of the British nation against us, who +charge this dishonor to have fallen upon us by him, +through him, and during his government?</p> + +<p>But all the mischief, he goes on to assert, was +in the previous system, in the formation of which<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_385" id="Page_385">{385}</a></span> +he had no share,—the system of 1775, when the +first treaty with the Nabob was made. "That system," +says he, "is not mine; it was made by General +Clavering, Colonel Monson, and Mr. Francis." So +it was, my Lords. It did them very great honor, +and I believe it ever will do them honor, in the +eyes of the British nation, that they took an opportunity, +without the violation of faith, without the +breach of any one treaty, and without injury to any +person, to do great and eminent services to the +Company. But Mr. Hastings disclaims it, unnecessarily +disclaims it, for no one charges him with it. +What we charge him with is the abuse of that +system. To one of these abuses I will now call +your Lordships' attention. Finding, soon after his +appointment to the office of Governor-General, that +the Nabob was likely to get into debt, he turns him +into a vassal, and resolves to treat him as such. You +will observe that this is not the only instance in +which, upon a failure of payment, the defaulter becomes +directly a vassal. You remember how Durbege +Sing, the moment he fell into an arrear of +tribute, became a vassal, and was thrown into prison, +without any inquiry into the causes which occasioned +that arrear. With respect to the Nabob of +Oude, we assert, and can prove, that his revenue +was 3,600,000<i>l.</i> at the day of his father's death; +and if the revenue fell off afterwards, there was +abundant reason to believe that he possessed in +abundance the means of paying the Company every +farthing.</p> + +<p>Before I quit this subject, your Lordships will +again permit me to reprobate the malicious insinuations +by which Mr. Hastings has thought proper to<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_386" id="Page_386">{386}</a></span> +slander the virtuous persons who are the authors +of that system which he complains of. They are +men whose characters this country will ever respect, +honor, and revere, both the living and the dead,—the +dead for the living, and the living for the dead. +They will altogether be revered for a conduct honorable +and glorious to Great Britain, whilst their +names stand as they now do, unspotted by the least +imputation of oppression, breach of faith, perjury, +bribery, or any other fraud whatever. I know there +was a faction formed against them upon that very +account. Be corrupt, you have friends; stem the +torrent of corruption, you open a thousand venal +mouths against you. Men resolved to do their duty +must be content to suffer such opprobrium, and I +am content; in the name of the living and of the +dead, and in the name of the Commons, I glory in +our having appointed some good servants at least +to India.</p> + +<p>But to proceed. "This system was not," says he, +"of my making." You would, then, naturally imagine +that the persons who made this abominable +system had also made some tyrannous use of it. Let +us see what use they made of it during the time +of their majority in the Council. There was an +arrear of subsidy due from the Nabob. How it +came into arrear we shall consider hereafter. The +Nabob proposed to pay it by taxing the jaghires +of his family, and taking some money from the +Begum. This was consented to by Mr. Bristow, at +that time Resident for the Company in Oude; and +to this arrangement Asoph ul Dowlah and his advisers +lent a willing ear. What did Mr. Hastings +then say of this transaction? He called it a violent<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_387" id="Page_387">{387}</a></span> +assumption of power on the part of the Council. +He did not, you see, then allow that a bad system +justified any persons whatever in an abuse of it. +He contended that it was a violent attack upon the +rights and property of the parties from whom the +money was to be taken, that it had no ground or +foundation in justice whatever, and that it was contrary +to every principle of right and equity.</p> + +<p>Your Lordships will please to bear in mind, that +afterwards, by his own consent, and the consent of +the rest of the Council, this business was compromised +between the son, the mother, and their relations. +A very great sum of money, which was +most useful to the Company at that period, was +raised by a family compact and arrangement among +themselves. This proceeding was sanctioned by the +Company, Mr. Hastings himself consenting; and a +pledge was given to the Begums and family of the +Nabob, that this should be the last demand made upon +them,—that it should be considered, not as taken +compulsively, but as a friendly and amicable donation. +They never admitted, nor did the Nabob ever +contend, that he had any right at all to take this +money from them. At that time it was not Mr. +Hastings's opinion that the badness of the system +would justify any violence as a consequence of it; +and when the advancement of the money was agreed +to between the parties, as a family and amicable +compact, he was as ready as anybody to propose and +sanction a regular treaty between the parties, that +all claims on one side and all kind of uneasiness on +the other should cease forever, under the guardianship +of British faith.</p> + +<p>Mr. Hastings, as your Lordships remember, has<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_388" id="Page_388">{388}</a></span> +conceded that British faith is the support of the +British empire; that, if that empire is to be maintained, +it is to be maintained by good faith; that, if +it is to be propagated, it is to be propagated by public +faith; and that, if the British empire falls, it will be +through perfidy and violence. These are the principles +which he assumes, when he chooses to reproach +others. But when he has to defend his own perfidy +and breaches of faith, then, as your Lordships will +find set forth in his defence before the House of +Commons on the Benares charge, he denies, or at +least questions, the validity of any treaty that can +at present be made with India. He declares that he +considers all treaties as being weakened by a considerable +degree of doubt respecting their validity and +their binding force, in such a state of things as exists +in India.</p> + +<p>Whatever was done, during that period of time to +which I have alluded, by the majority of the Council, +Mr. Hastings considered himself as having nothing +to do with, on the plea of his being a dissentient +member: a principle which, like other principles, I +shall take some notice of by-and-by. Colonel Monson +and General Clavering died soon after, and Mr. Hastings +obtained a majority in the Council, and was +then, as he calls it, restored to his authority; so that +any evil that could be done by evil men under that +evil system could have lasted but for a very short +time indeed. From that moment, Mr. Hastings, in +my opinion, became responsible for every act done in +Council, while he was there, which he did not resist, +and for every engagement which he did not oppose. +For your Lordships will not bear that miserable jargon +which you have heard, shameful to office and to<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_389" id="Page_389">{389}</a></span> +official authority, that a man, when, he happens not +to find himself in a majority upon any measure, may +think himself excusable for the total neglect of his +duty; that in such a situation he is not bound to +propose anything that it might be proper to propose, +or to resist anything that it might be proper to resist. +What would be the inference from such an assumption? +That he can never act in a commission; that, +unless a man has the supreme power, he is not responsible +for anything he does or neglects to do. +This is another principle which your Lordships will +see constantly asserted and constantly referred to by +Mr. Hastings. Now I do contend, that, notwithstanding +his having been in a minority, if there was +anything to be done that could prevent oppressive +consequences, he was bound to do that thing; and +that he was bound to propose every possible remedial +measure. This proud, rebellious proposition against +the law, that any one individual in the Council may +say that he is responsible for nothing, because he is +not the whole Council, calls for your Lordships' +strongest reprobation.</p> + +<p>I must now beg leave to observe to you, that the +treaty was made (and I wish your Lordships to advert +to dates) in the year 1775; Mr. Hastings acquired +the majority in something more than a year +afterwards; and therefore, supposing the acts of the +former majority to have been ever so iniquitous, their +power lasted but a short time. From the year 1776 +to 1784 Mr. Hastings had the whole government of +Oude in himself, by having the majority in the Council. +My Lords, it is no offence that a Governor-General, +or anybody else, has the majority in the Council. +To have the government in himself is no of<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_390" id="Page_390">{390}</a></span>fence. +Neither was it any offence, if you please, that +the Nabob was virtually a vassal to the Company, as +he contends he was. For the question is not, what +a Governor-General <i>may</i> do, but what Warren Hastings +did do. He who has a majority in Council, and +records his own acts there, may justify these acts +as legal: I mean the mode is legal. But as he executes +whatever he proposes as Governor-General, he +is solely responsible for the <i>nature</i> of the acts themselves.</p> + +<p>I shall now show your Lordships that Mr. Hastings, +finding, as he states, the Nabob to be made by +the treaty in 1775 eventually a vassal to the Company, +has thought proper to make him a vassal to himself, +for his own private purposes. Your Lordships +will see what corrupt and iniquitous purposes they +were. In the first place, in order to annihilate in +effect the Council, and to take wholly from them +their control in the affairs of Oude, he suppressed +(your Lordships will find the fact proved in your +minutes) the Persian correspondence, which was the +whole correspondence of Oude. This whole correspondence +was secreted by him, and kept from the +Council. It was never communicated to the Persian +translator of the Company, Mr. Colebrooke, who had +a salary for executing that office. It was secreted, +and kept in the private cabinet of Mr. Hastings; +from the period of 1781 to 1785 no part of it was +communicated to the Council. There is nothing, as +your Lordships have often found in this trial, that +speaks for the man like himself; there is nothing +will speak for his conduct like the records of the +Company.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_391" id="Page_391">{391}</a></span></p> + +<div class="blockquote"> +<p style="text-align: right;">"<i>Fort William, 19th February, 1785.</i></p> + +<p>"At a Council: present, the Honorable John Macpherson, +Esquire, Governor-General, President, and +John Stables, Esquire.</p> + +<hr style='width: 25%;' /> + +<p>"The Persian Translator, attending in obedience to +the Board's orders, reports, that, since the end of the +year 1781, there have been no books of correspondence +kept in his office, because, from that time until +the late Governor-General's departure, he was employed +but once by the Governor-General to manage +the correspondence, during a short visit which Major +Davy, the military Persian interpreter, paid by the +Governor's order to Lucknow; that, during that +whole period of three years, he remained entirely ignorant +of the correspondence, as he was applied to +on no occasion, except for a few papers sometimes +sent to him by the secretaries, which he always returned +to them as soon as translated.</p> + +<p>"The Persian Translator has received from Mr. +Scott, since the late Governor-General's departure, a +trunk containing English draughts and translations +and the Persian originals of letters and papers, with +three books in the Persian language containing copies +of letters written between August, 1782, and January, +1785; and if the Board should please to order the +secretaries of the general department to furnish him +with copies of all translations and draughts recorded +in their Consultations between the 1st of January, +1782, and the 31st of January, 1785, he thinks that +he should be able, with what he has found in Captain +Scott's trunk, to make up the correspondence for that +period.</p> + +<p> +<span style="margin-left: 8em;">(Signed) "EDWARD COLEBROOKE,<br /></span> +<span style="margin-left: 10em;">"<i>Persian Translator.</i>"<br /></span> +<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_392" id="Page_392">{392}</a></span></p> +</div> + +<p>Hear, then, my Lords, what becomes of the records +of the Company, which were to be the vouchers for +every public act,—which were to show whether, in the +Company's transactions, agreements, and treaties with +the native powers, the public faith was kept or not. +You see them all crammed into Mr. Scott's trunk: a +trunk into which they put what they please, take out +what they please, suppress what they please, or thrust +in whatever will answer their purpose. The records +of the Governor-General and Council of Bengal are +kept in Captain Jonathan Scott's trunk; this trunk +is to be considered as the real and true channel of +intelligence between the Company and the country +powers. But even this channel was not open to any +member of the Council, except Mr. Hastings; and +when the Council, for the first time, daring to think +for themselves, call upon the Persian Translator, he +knows nothing about it. We find that it is given +into the hands of a person nominated by Mr. Hastings,—Major +Davy. What do the Company know of +him? Why, he was Mr. Hastings's private secretary. +In this manner the Council have been annihilated +during all these transactions, and have no other +knowledge of them than just what Mr. Hastings and +his trunk-keeper thought proper to give them. All, +then, that we know of these transactions is from the +miserable, imperfect, garbled correspondence.</p> + +<p>But even if these papers contained a full and faithful +account of the correspondence, what we charge is +its not being delivered to the Council as it occurred +from time to time. Mr. Hastings kept the whole +government of Oude in his own hands; so that the +Council had no power of judging his acts, of checking, +controlling, advising, or remonstrating. It was<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_393" id="Page_393">{393}</a></span> +totally annihilated by him; and we charge, as an act +of treason and rebellion against the act of Parliament +by which he held his office, his depriving the Council +of their legitimate authority, by shutting them out +from the knowledge of all affairs,—except, indeed, +when he thought it expedient, for his own justification, +to have their nominal concurrence or subsequent +acquiescence in any of his more violent measures.</p> + +<p>Your Lordships see Mr. Hastings's system, a system +of concealment, a system of turning the vassals of the +Company into his own vassals, to make them contributory, +not to the Company, but to himself. He has +avowed this system in Benares; he has avowed it in +Oude. It was his constant practice. Your Lordships +see in Oude he kept a correspondence with Mr. +Markham for years, and did alone all the material +acts which ought to have been done in Council. He +delegated a power to Mr. Markham which he had not +to delegate; and you will see he has done the same +in every part of India.</p> + +<p>We first charge him not only with acting without +authority, but with a strong presumption, founded on +his concealment, of intending to act mischievously. +We next charge his concealing and withdrawing correspondence, +as being directly contrary to the orders +of the Court of Directors, the practice of his office, +and the very nature and existence of the Council in +which he was appointed to preside. We charge this +as a substantive crime, and as the forerunner of the +oppression, desolation, and ruin of that miserable +country.</p> + +<p>Mr. Hastings having thus rendered the Council +blind and ignorant, and consequently fit for subserviency, +what does he next do? I am speaking, not with<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_394" id="Page_394">{394}</a></span> +regard to the time of his particular acts, but with +regard to the general spirit of the proceedings. He +next flies in the face of the Company upon the same +principle on which he removed Mr. Fowke from Benares. +"I removed <i>him</i> on political grounds," says +he, "against the orders of the Court of Directors, +because I thought it necessary that the Resident +should be a man of my own nomination and confidence." +At Oude he proceeds on the same principle. +Mr. Bristow had been nominated to the office of +Resident by the Court of Directors. Mr. Hastings, +by an act of Parliament, was ordered to obey the +Court of Directors. He positively refuses to receive +Mr. Bristow, for no other reason that we know of but +because he was nominated by the Court of Directors; +he defies the Court, and declares in effect that they +shall not govern that province, but that he will govern +it by a Resident of his own.</p> + +<p>Your Lordships will mark his progress in the +establishment of that new system, which, he says, +he had been obliged to adopt by the evil system of +his predecessors. First, he annihilates the Council, +formed by an act of Parliament, and by order of the +Court of Directors. In the second place, he defies the +order of the Court, who had the undoubted nomination +of all their own servants, and who ordered him, +under the severest injunction, to appoint Mr. Bristow +to the office of Resident in Oude. He for some time +refused to nominate Mr. Bristow to that office; and +even when he was forced, against his will, to permit +him for a while to be there, he sent Mr. Middleton +and Mr. Johnson, who annihilated Mr. Bristow's authority +so completely that no one public act passed +through his hands.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_395" id="Page_395">{395}</a></span></p> + +<p>After he had ended this conflict with the Directors, +and had entirely shook off their authority, he resolved +that the native powers should know that they were +not to look to the Court of Directors, but to look to +his arbitrary will in all things; and therefore, to the +astonishment of the world, and as if it were designedly +to expose the nakedness of the Parliament of +Great Britain, to expose the nakedness of the laws +of Great Britain, and the nakedness of the authority +of the Court of Directors to the country powers, he +wrote a letter, which your Lordships will find in page +795 of the printed Minutes. In this letter the secret +of his government is discovered to the country powers. +They are given to understand, that, whatever +exaction, whatever oppression or ruin they may suffer, +they are to look nowhere for relief but to him: not +to the Council, not to the Court of Directors, not to +the sovereign authority of Great Britain, but to him, +and him only.</p> + +<p>Before we proceed to this letter, we will first read +to you the Minute of Council by which he dismissed +Mr. Bristow upon a former occasion, (it is in page +507 of the printed Minutes,) that your Lordships may +see his audacious defiance of the laws of the country. +We wish, I say, before we show you the horrible and +fatal effects of this his defiance, to impress continually +upon your Lordships' minds that this man is to +be tried by the laws of the country, and that it is not +in his power to annihilate their authority and the +authority of his masters. We insist upon it, that +every man under the authority of this country is +bound to obey its laws. This minute relates to his +first removal of Mr. Bristow: I read it in order to +show that he dared to defy the Court of Directors so +early as the year 1776.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_396" id="Page_396">{396}</a></span></p> + +<p>"Resolved, That Mr. John Bristow be recalled to +the Presidency from the court of the Nabob of Oude, +and that Mr. Nathaniel Middleton be restored to the +appointment of Resident at that court, subject to the +orders and authority of the Governor-General and +Council, conformably to the motion of the Governor-General."</p> + +<p>I will next read to your Lordships the orders of the +Directors for his reinstatement, on the 4th of July, +1777.</p> + +<p>"Upon the most careful perusal of your proceedings +upon the 2d of December, 1776, relative to the +recall of Mr. Bristow from the court of the Nabob of +Oude, and the appointment of Mr. Nathaniel Middleton +to that station, we must declare our strongest +disapprobation of the whole of that transaction. We +observe that the Governor-General's motion for the +recall of Mr. Bristow includes that for the restoration +of Mr. Nathaniel Middleton; but as neither of those +measures appear to us necessary, or even justifiable, +they cannot receive our approbation. With respect +to Mr. Bristow, we find no shadow of charge against +him. It appears that he has executed his trust to +the entire satisfaction even of those members of the +Council who did not concur in his appointment. You +have unanimously recommended him to our notice; +attention to your recommendation has induced us to +afford him marks of our favor, and to reannex the +emoluments affixed by you to his appointment, which +had been discontinued by our order; and as we must +be of opinion that a person of acknowledged abilities, +whose conduct has thus gained him the esteem of his +superiors, ought not to be degraded without just +cause, we do not hesitate to interpose in his behalf,<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_397" id="Page_397">{397}</a></span> +and therefore direct that Mr. Bristow do forthwith +return to his station of Resident at Oude, from which +he has been so improperly removed."</p> + +<p>Upon the receipt of these orders by the Council, +Mr. Francis, then a member of the Council, moves, +"That, in obedience to the Company's orders, Mr. +Bristow be forthwith appointed and directed to return +to his station of Resident at Oude, and that +Mr. Purling be ordered to deliver over charge of the +office to Mr. Bristow immediately on his arrival, and +return himself forthwith to the Presidency; also that +the Governor-General be requested to furnish Mr. +Bristow with the usual letter of credence to the Nabob +Vizier."</p> + +<p>Upon this motion being made, Mr. Hastings entered +the following minute.</p> + +<p>"I will ask, who is Mr. Bristow, that a member of +the administration should at such a time hold him +forth as an instrument for the degradation of the first +executive member of this government? What are the +professed objects of his appointment? What are the +merits and services, or what the qualifications, which +entitle him to such an uncommon distinction? Is it +for his superior integrity, or from his eminent abilities, +that he is to be dignified, at such hazards of every +consideration that ought to influence members of this +administration? Of the former I know no proofs; I +am sure that it is not an evidence of it, that he has +been enabled to make himself the principal in such a +competition; and for the test of his abilities, I appeal +to the letter which he has dared to write to this board, +and which, I am ashamed to say, we have suffered. I +desire that a copy of it may be inserted in this day's +proceedings, that it may stand before the eyes of every<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_398" id="Page_398">{398}</a></span> +member of the board, when he shall give his vote +upon a question for giving their confidence to a man, +their servant, who has publicly insulted them, his +masters, and the members of the government, to +whom he owes his obedience; who, assuming an association +with the Court of Directors, and erecting +himself into a tribunal, has arraigned them for disobedience +of orders, passed judgment upon them, and +condemned or acquitted them as their magistrate and +superior. Let the board consider whether a man possessed +of so independent a spirit, who has already +shown such a contempt of their authority, who has +shown himself so wretched an advocate for his own +cause and negotiator for his own interest, is fit to be +trusted with the guardianship of their honor, the execution +of their measures, and as their confidential +manager and negotiator with the princes of India."</p> + +<p>My Lords, you here see an instance of what I have +before stated to your Lordships, and what I shall +take the liberty of recommending to your constant +consideration. You see that a tyrant and a rebel is +one and the same thing. You see this man, at the +very time that he is a direct rebel to the Company, +arbitrarily and tyrannically displacing Mr. Bristow, +although he had previously joined in the approbation +of his conduct, and in voting him a pecuniary reward. +He is ordered by the Court of Directors to +restore that person, who desires, in a suppliant, decent, +proper tone, that the Company's orders should +produce their effect, and that the Council would have +the goodness to restore him to his situation.</p> + +<p>My Lords, you have seen the audacious insolence, +the tyrannical pride, with which he dares to treat this +order. You have seen the recorded minute which<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_399" id="Page_399">{399}</a></span> +he has dared to send to the Court of Directors; and +in this you see, that, when he cannot directly asperse +a man's conduct, and has nothing to say against it, he +maliciously, I should perhaps rather say enviously, +insinuates that he had unjustly made his fortune. +"You are," says he, "to judge from the independence +of his manner and style, whether he could or +no have got that without some unjust means." God +forbid I should ever be able to invent anything that +can equal the impudence of what this man dares to +write to his superiors, or the insolent style in which +he dares to treat persons who are not his servants!</p> + +<p>Who made the servants of the Company the master +of the servants of the Company? The Court of +Directors are their fellow-servants; they are all the +servants of this kingdom. Still the claim of a fellow-servant +to hold an office which the Court of Directors +had legally appointed him to is considered by this +audacious tyrant as an insult to him. By this you +may judge how he treats not only the servants of the +Company, but the natives of the country, and by +what means he has brought them into that abject +state of servitude in which they are ready to do anything +he wishes and to sign anything he dictates. I +must again beg your Lordships to remark what this +man has had the folly and impudence to place upon +the records of the Council of which he was President; +and I will venture to assert that so extraordinary +a performance never before appeared on the +records of any court, Eastern or European. Because +Mr. Bristow claims an office which is his right and +his freehold as long as the Company chooses, Mr. +Hastings accuses him of being an accomplice with the +Court of Directors in a conspiracy against him; and<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_400" id="Page_400">{400}</a></span> +because, after long delays, he had presented an humble +petition to have the Court of Directors' orders +in his favor carried into execution, he says "he has +erected himself into a tribunal of justice; that he +has arraigned the Council for disobedience of orders, +passed judgment upon them, and condemned or acquitted +them as their magistrate and superior."</p> + +<p>Let us suppose his Majesty to have been pleased to +appoint any one to an office in the gift of the crown, +what should we think of the person whose business +it was to execute the King's commands, if he should +say to the person appointed, when he claimed his +office, "You shall not have it, you assume to be +my superior, and you disgrace and dishonor me"? +Good God! my Lords, where was this language +learned? in what country, and in what barbarous nation +of Hottentots was this jargon picked up? For +there is no Eastern court that I ever heard of (and I +believe I have been as conversant with the manners +and customs of the East as most persons whose business +has not directly led them into that country) +where such conduct would have been tolerated. A +bashaw, if he should be ordered by the Grand Seignior +to invest another with his office, puts the letter upon +his head, and obedience immediately follows.</p> + +<p>But the obedience of a barbarous magistrate should +not be compared to the obedience which a British +subject owes to the laws of his country. Mr. Hastings +receives an order which he should have instantly +obeyed. He is reminded of this by the person who +suffers from his disobedience; and this proves that +person to be possessed of too independent a spirit. +Ay, my Lords, here is the grievance;—no man can +dare show in India an independent spirit. It is this,<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_401" id="Page_401">{401}</a></span> +and not his having shown such a contempt of their +authority, not his having shown himself so wretched +an advocate for his own cause and so had a negotiator +for his own interest, that makes him unfit to be trusted +with the guardianship of their honor, the execution +of their measures, and to be their confidential +manager and negotiator with the princes of India.</p> + +<p>But, my Lords, what is this want of skill which Mr. +Bristow has shown in negotiating his own affairs? +Mr. Hastings will inform us. "He should have pocketed +the letter of the Court of Directors; he should +never have made the least mention of it. He should +have come to my banian, Cantoo Baboo; he should +have offered him a bribe upon the occasion. That +would have been the way to succeed with me, who +am a public-spirited taker of bribes and nuzzers. +But this base fool, this man, who is but a vile negotiator +for his own interest, has dared to accept the patronage +of the Court of Directors. He should have +secured the protection of Cantoo Baboo, their more +efficient rival. This would have been the skilful +mode of doing the business." But this man, it seems, +had not only shown himself an unskilful negotiator, +he had likewise afforded evidence of his want of integrity. +And what is this evidence? His having +"enabled himself to become the <i>principal</i> in such a +competition." That is to say, he had, by his meritorious +conduct in the service of his masters, the Directors, +obtained their approbation and favor. Mr. Hastings +then contemptuously adds, "And for the test of +his abilities, I appeal to the letter which he has dared +to write to the board, and which I am ashamed to say +we have suffered." Whatever that letter may be, I +will venture to say there is not a word or syllable in<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_402" id="Page_402">{402}</a></span> +it that tastes of such insolence and arbitrariness with +regard to the servants of the Company, his fellow-servants, +of such audacious rebellion with regard to the +laws of his country, as are contained in this minute +of Mr. Hastings.</p> + +<p>But, my Lords, why did he choose to have Mr. Middleton +appointed Resident? Your Lordships have +not seen Mr. Bristow: you have only heard of him as +a humble suppliant to have the orders of the Company +obeyed. But you have seen Mr. Middleton. +You know that Mr. Middleton is a good man to keep +a secret: I describe him no further. You know what +qualifications Mr. Hastings requires in a favorite. +You also know why he was turned out of his employment, +with the approbation of the Court of Directors: +that it was principally because, when Resident in +Oude, he positively, audaciously, and rebelliously refused +to lay before the Council the correspondence +with the country powers. He says he gave it up to +Mr. Hastings. Whether he has or has not destroyed +it we know not; all we know of it is, that it is not +found to this hour. We cannot even find Mr. Middleton's +trunk, though Mr. Jonathan Scott did at +last produce his. The whole of the Persian correspondence, +during Mr. Middleton's Residence, was +refused, as I have said, to the board at Calcutta and +to the Court of Directors,—was refused to the legal +authorities; and Mr. Middleton, for that very refusal, +was again appointed by Mr. Hastings to supersede +Mr. Bristow, removed without a pretence of offence; +he received, I say, this appointment from Mr. Hastings, +as a reward for that servile compliance by which +he dissolved every tie between himself and his legal +masters.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_403" id="Page_403">{403}</a></span></p> + +<p>The matter being now brought to a simple issue, +whether the Governor-General is or is not bound to +obey his superiors, I shall here leave it with your +Lordships; and I have only to beg your Lordships +will remark the course of events as they follow +each other,—keeping in mind that the prisoner at +your bar declared Mr. Bristow to be a man of suspected +integrity, on account of his independence, and +deficient in ability, because he did not know how +best to promote his own interest.</p> + +<p>I must here state to your Lordships, that it was +the duty of the Resident to transact the money concerns +of the Company, as well as its political negotiations. +You will now see how Mr. Hastings divided +that duty, after he became apprehensive that the +Court of Directors might be inclined to assert their +own authority, and to assert it in a proper manner, +which they so rarely did. When, therefore, his passion +had cooled, when his resentment of those violent +indignities which had been offered to him, namely, +the indignity of being put in mind that he had any +superior under heaven, (for I know of no other,) he +adopts the expedient of dividing the Residency into +two offices; he makes a fair compromise between +himself and the Directors; he appoints Mr. Middleton +to the management of the money concerns, and +Mr. Bristow to that of the political affairs. Your +Lordships see that Mr. Bristow, upon whom he had +fixed the disqualification for political affairs, was the +very person appointed to that department; and to +Mr. Middleton, the man of his confidence, he gives +the management of the money transactions. He +discovers plainly where his heart was: for where +your treasure is, there will your heart be also. This<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_404" id="Page_404">{404}</a></span> +private agent, this stifler of correspondence, a man +whose costive retention discovers no secret committed +to him, and whose slippery memory is subject +to a diarrhoea which permits everything he did know +to escape,—this very man he places in a situation +where his talents could only be useful for concealment, +and where concealment could only be used to +cover fraud; while Mr. Bristow, who was by his official +engagement responsible to the Company for fair +and clear accounts, was appointed superintendent of +political affairs, an office for which Mr. Hastings declared +he was totally unfit.</p> + +<p>My Lords, you will judge of the designs which the +prisoner had in contemplation, when he dared to +commit this act of rebellion against the Company; +you will see that it could not have been any other +than getting the money transactions of Oude into his +own hands. The presumption of a corrupt motive is +here as strong as, I believe, it possibly can be.</p> + +<p>The next point to which I have to direct your +Lordships' attention is that part of the prisoner's +conduct, in this matter, by which he exposed the +nakedness of the Company's authority to the native +powers. You would imagine, that, after the first +dismissal of Mr. Bristow, Mr. Hastings would have +done with him forever; that nothing could have induced +him again to bring forward a man who had +dared to insult him, a man who had shown an independent +spirit, a man who had dishonored the +Council and insulted his masters, a man of doubtful +integrity and convicted unfitness for office. But, my +Lords, in the face of all this, he afterwards sends this +very man, with undivided authority, into the country +as sole Resident. And now your Lordships shall hear<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_405" id="Page_405">{405}</a></span> +in what manner he accounts for this appointment to +Gobind Ram, the <i>vakeel</i>, or ambassador, of the Nabob +Asoph ul Dowlah at Calcutta. It is in page 795 of +the printed Minutes.</p> + +<div class="blockquote"> +<p class='center'><i>Extract of an Arzee sent by Rajah Gobind Ram to +the Vizier, by the Governor-General's directions, and +written the 27th of August, 1782.</i></p> + +<p>"This day the Governor-General sent for me in private. +After recapitulating the various informations +he had received respecting the anarchy and confusion +said to reign throughout your Highness's country, +and complains that neither your Highness, or Hyder +Beg Khân, or Mr. Middleton, or Mr. Johnson, ever +wrote to him on the state of your affairs, or, if he +ever received a letter from your presence, it always +contained assertions contrary to the above informations, +the Governor-General proceeded as follows.</p> + +<p>"That it was his intention to have appointed Mr. +David Anderson to attend upon your Highness, but +that he was still with Sindia, and there was no prospect +of his speedy return from his camp; therefore it was +now his wish to appoint Mr. John Bristow, who was +well experienced in business, to Lucknow. That, +when Mr. Bristow formerly held the office of Resident +there, he was not appointed by him; and that, notwithstanding +he had not shown any instances of disobedience, +yet he had deemed it necessary to recall +him, because he had been patronized and appointed +by gentlemen who were in opposition to him, and +had counteracted and thwarted all his measures; +that this had been his reason for recalling Mr. Bristow. +That, since Mr. Francis's return to Europe, +and the arrival of information there of the deaths of<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_406" id="Page_406">{406}</a></span> +the other gentlemen, the King and the Company had +declared their approbation of his, the Governor-General's, +conduct, and had conferred upon him the most +ample powers; that they had sent out Mr. Macpherson, +who was his old and particular friend; and that +Mr. Stables, that was on his way here as a member +of the Supreme Council, was also his particular +friend; that Mr. Wheler had received letters from +Europe, informing him that the members of the +Council were enjoined all of them to coöperate and +act in conjunction with him, in every measure which +should be agreeable to him; and that there was no +one in Council now who was not united with him, +and consequently that his authority was perfect and +complete. That Mr. Bristow, as it was known to me, +had returned to Europe; but that during his stay +there he had never said anything disrespectful of +him or endeavored to injure him; on the contrary, +he had received accounts from Europe that Mr. Bristow +had spoken much in his praise, so that Mr. +Bristow's friends had become his friends; that Mr. +Bristow had lately been introduced to him by Mr. +Macpherson, had explained his past conduct perfectly +to his satisfaction, and had requested from him the +appointment to Lucknow, and had declared, in the +event of his obtaining the appointment, that he +should show every mark of attention and obedience +to the pleasure of your Highness, and his, the Governor's, +saying, that your Highness was well pleased +with him, and that he knew what you had written +formerly was at the instigation of Mr. Middleton. +That, in consequence of the foregoing, he, the Governor, +had determined to have appointed Mr. Bristow +to Lucknow, but had postponed his dismission to his<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_407" id="Page_407">{407}</a></span> +office for the following reasons, <i>videlicet</i>, people at +Lucknow might think that Mr. Bristow had obtained +his appointment in consequence of orders from Europe, +and contrary to the Governor's inclination; +but as the contrary was the case, and as he now considered +Mr. Bristow as the object of his own particular +patronage, therefore he directed me to forward +Mr. Bristow's arzee to the presence; and that it was +the Governor's wish that your Highness, on the receipt +thereof, would write a letter to him, and, as +from yourself, request of him that Mr. Bristow may +be appointed to Lucknow, and that you would write +an answer to this arzee, expressive of your personal +satisfaction, on the subject. The Governor concluded +with injunctions, that, until the arrival of your +Highness's letter requesting the appointment of Mr. +Bristow, and your answer to this arzee, that I should +keep the particulars of this conversation a profound +secret; for that the communication of it to any person +whatever would not only cause his displeasure, +but would throw affairs at Lucknow into great confusion.</p> + +<p>"The preceding is the substance of the Governor's +directions to me. He afterwards went to Mr. Macpherson's, +and I attended him. Mr. Bristow was +there; the Governor took Mr. Bristow's arzee from +his hand and delivered it into mine, and thence proceeded +to Council. Mr. Bristow's arzee, and the +following particulars, I transmit and communicate +by the Governor's directions; and I request that +I may be favored with the answer to the arzee and +the letter to the Governor as soon as possible, as +his injunctions to me were very particular on the +subject."<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_408" id="Page_408">{408}</a></span></p> +</div> + +<p>My Lords, I have to observe upon this very extraordinary +transaction, that you will see many things +in this letter that are curious, and worthy of being +taken out of that abyss of secrets, Mr. Scott's trunk, +in which this arzee was found. It contains, as far +as the prisoner thinks proper to reveal it, the true +secret of the transaction.</p> + +<p>He confesses, first, the state of the Vizier's country, +as communicated to him in various accounts of +the anarchy and confusion said to reign throughout +his territories. This was in the year 1782, during +the time that the Oude correspondence was not communicated +to the Council.</p> + +<p>He next stated, that neither the Vizier, nor his +minister, nor Mr. Middleton, nor Mr. Johnson, ever +wrote to him on the state of affairs. Here, then, are +three or four persons, all nominated by himself, every +one of them supposed to be in his strictest confidence,—the +Nabob and his vassal, Hyder Beg Khân, +being, as we shall show afterwards, entirely his dependants,—and +yet Mr. Hastings declares, that not +one of them had done their duty, or had written him +one word concerning the state of the country, and +the anarchy and confusion that prevailed in it, and +that, when the Nabob did write, his assertions were +contrary to the real state of things. Now this irregular +correspondence, which he carried on at +Lucknow, and which gave him, as he pretends, this +contradictory information, was, as your Lordships will +see, nothing more or less than a complete fraud.</p> + +<p>Your Lordships will next observe, that he tells the +vakeel his reason for turning him out was, that he +had been patronized by other gentlemen. This was +true: but they had a right to patronize him; and<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_409" id="Page_409">{409}</a></span> +they did not patronize him from private motives, but +in direct obedience to the order of the Court of Directors. +He then adds the assurance which he had +received from Mr. Bristow, that he would be perfectly +obedient to him, Mr. Hastings, in future; and +he goes on to tell the vakeel that he knew the Vizier +was once well pleased with him, (Mr. Bristow,) and +that his formal complaints against him were written +at the instigation of Mr. Middleton.</p> + +<p>Here is another discovery, my Lords. When he +recalled Mr. Bristow, he did it under the pretence +of its being desired by the Nabob of Oude; and that, +consequently, he would not keep at the Nabob's +court a man that was disagreeable to him. Yet, +when the thing comes to be opened, it appears that +Mr. Middleton had made the Nabob, unwillingly, +write a false letter. This subornation of falsehood +appears also to have been known to Mr. Hastings. +Did he, either as the natural guardian and protector +of the reputation of his fellow-servants, or as the +official administrator of the laws of his country, or +as a faithful servant of the Company, ever call Mr. +Middleton to an account for it? No, never. To +everybody, therefore, acquainted with the characters +and circumstances of the parties concerned, the conclusion +will appear evident that he was himself the +author of it. But your Lordships will find there is +no end of his insolence and duplicity.</p> + +<p>He next tells the vakeel, that the reason why he +postponed the mission of Mr. Bristow to Lucknow +was lest the people of Lucknow should think he had +obtained his appointment in consequence of orders +from Europe, and contrary to the Governor's inclination. +You see, my Lords, he would have the<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_410" id="Page_410">{410}</a></span> +people of the country believe that they are to receive +the person appointed Resident not as appointed +by the Company, but in consequence of his being +under Mr. Hastings's particular patronage; and to +remove from them any suspicion that the Resident +would obey the orders of the Court of Directors, or +any orders but his own, he proceeds in the manner +I have read to your Lordships.</p> + +<p>You here see the whole machinery of the business. +He removes Mr. Bristow, contrary to the orders of +the Court of Directors. Why? Because, says he +to the Court of Directors, the Nabob complained of +him, and desired it. He here says, that he knew the +Nabob did not desire it, but that the letter of complaint +really and substantially was Mr. Middleton's. +Lastly, as he recalls Mr. Bristow, so he wishes him to +be called back in the same fictitious and fraudulent +manner. This system of fraud proves that there is +not one letter from that country, not one act of this +Vizier, not one act of his ministers, not one act of +his ambassadors, but what is false and fraudulent. +And now think, my Lords, first, of the slavery of the +Company's servants, subjected in this manner to the +arbitrary will and corrupt frauds of Mr. Hastings! +Next think of the situation of the princes of the +country, obliged to complain without matter of complaint, +to approve without [ground?] of satisfaction, +and to have all their correspondence fabricated by +Mr. Hastings at Calcutta!</p> + +<p>But, my Lords, it was not indignities of this kind +alone that the native princes suffered from this system +of fraud and duplicity. Their more essential +interests, and those of the people, were involved in it; +it pervaded and poisoned the whole mass of their +internal government.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_411" id="Page_411">{411}</a></span></p> + +<p>Who was the instrument employed in all this +double-dealing? Gobind Ram, the Vizier's diplomatic +minister at Calcutta. Suspicions perpetually arise +in his mind whether he is not cheated and imposed +upon. He could never tell when he had Mr. Hastings +fixed upon any point. He now finds him recommending +Mr. Middleton, and then declaring that Mr. +Middleton neglects the duty of his office, and gives +him, Gobind Ram, information that is fraudulent +and directly contrary to the truth. He is let into +various contradictory secrets, and becomes acquainted +with innumerable frauds, falsehoods, and prevarications. +He knew that the whole pretended government +of Oude was from beginning to end a deception; +that it was an imposture for the purpose of corruption +and peculation. Such was the situation of the +Nabob's vakeel. The Nabob himself was really at a +loss to know who had and who had not the Governor's +confidence; whether he was acting in obedience +to the orders of the Court of Directors, or whether +their orders were not always to be disobeyed. He +thus writes to Gobind Ram, who was exactly in +the same uncertainty.</p> + +<p>"As to the commands of Mr. Hastings which you +write on the subject of the distraction of the country +and the want of information from me, and his wishes, +that, as Mr. John Bristow has shown sincere wishes +and attachment to Mr. Hastings, I should write for +him to send Mr. John Bristow, it would have been +proper and necessary for you privately to have understood +what were Mr. Hastings's real intentions, +whether the choice of sending Mr. John Bristow was +his own desire, or whether it was in compliance with +Mr. Macpherson's, that I might then have written<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_412" id="Page_412">{412}</a></span> +conformably thereto. Writings are now sent to you +for both cases; having privately understood the wishes +of Mr. Hastings, deliver whichever of the writings +he should order you; for I study Mr. Hastings's satisfaction; +whoever is his friend is mine, and whoever +is his enemy is mine. But in both these cases, +my wishes are the same; that having consented to +the paper of questions which Major Davy carried with +him, and having given me the authority of the country, +whomever he may afterwards appoint, I am satisfied. +I am now brought to great distress by these +gentlemen, who ruin me; in case of consent, I am +contented with Majors Davy and Palmer. Hereafter, +whatever may be Mr. Hastings's desire, it is best."</p> + +<p>Here is a poor, miserable instrument, confessing +himself to be such, ruined by Mr. Hastings's public +agents, Mr. Middleton and Mr. Johnson; ruined by +his private agents, Major Davy and Major Palmer; +ruined equally by them all; and at last declaring in +a tone of despair, "If you have a mind really to keep +Major Davy and Major Palmer here, why, I must +consent to it. Do what you please with me, I am +your creature; for God's sake, let me have a little +rest."</p> + +<p>Your Lordships shall next hear what account +Hyder Beg Khân, the Vizier's prime-minister, gives +of the situation in which he and his master were +placed.</p> + +<div class="blockquote"> +<p class="center"><i>Extract of a Letter from Hyder Beg Khân, received +21st April, 1785.</i></p> + +<p>"I hope that such orders and commands as relate +to the friendship between his Highness and the Company's +governments and to your will may be sent<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_413" id="Page_413">{413}</a></span> +through Major Palmer, in your own private letters, +or in your letters to the Major, who is appointed +from you at the presence of his Highness, that, in +obedience to your orders, he may properly explain +your commands, and, whatever affair may be settled, +he may first secretly inform you of it, and afterwards +his Highness may, conformably thereto, write an answer, +and I also may represent it. By this system, +your pleasure will always be fully made known to his +Highness; and his Highness and we will execute +whatever may be your orders, without deviating a +hair's-breadth: and let not the representations of +interested persons be approved of, because his Highness +makes no opposition to your will; and I, your +servant, am ready in obedience and service, and I +make no excuses."</p> +</div> + +<p>Now, my Lords, was there ever such a discovery +made of the arcana of any public theatre? You see +here, behind the ostensible scenery, all the crooked +working of the machinery developed and laid open to +the world. You now see by what secret movement +the master of the mechanism has conducted the +great Indian opera,—an opera of fraud, deceptions, +and harlequin tricks. You have it all laid open +before you. The ostensible scene is drawn aside; it +has vanished from your sight. All the strutting signors, +and all the soft signoras are gone; and instead +of a brilliant spectacle of descending chariots, gods, +goddesses, sun, moon, and stars, you have nothing to +gaze on but sticks, wire, ropes, and machinery. You +find the appearance all false and fraudulent; and you +see the whole trick at once. All this, my Lords, we +owe to Major Scott's trunk, which, by admitting us<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_414" id="Page_414">{414}</a></span> +behind the scene, has enabled us to discover the real +state of Mr. Hastings's government in India. And +can your Lordships believe that all this mechanism +of fraud, prevarication, and falsehood could have +been intended for any purpose but to forward that +robbery, corruption, and peculation by which Mr. +Hastings has destroyed one of the finest countries +upon earth? Is it necessary, after this, for me to +tell you that you are not to believe one word of the +correspondence stated by him to have been received +from India? This discovery goes to the whole matter +of the whole government of the country. You +have seen what that government was, and by-and-by +you shall see the effects of it.</p> + +<p>Your Lordships have now seen this trunk of Mr. +Scott's producing the effects of Aladdin's lamp,—of +which your Lordships may read in books much more +worthy of credit than Mr. Hastings's correspondence. +I have given all the credit of this precious discovery +to Mr. Scott's trunk; but, my Lords, I find that I +have to ask pardon for a mistake in supposing the +letter of Hyder Beg Khân to be a part of Mr. Hastings's +correspondence. It comes from another quarter, +not much less singular, and equally authentic +and unimpeachable. But though it is not from the +trunk, it smells of the trunk, it smells of the leather. +I was as proud of my imaginary discovery as Sancho +Panza was that one of his ancestors had discovered a +taste of iron in some wine, and another a taste of +leather in the same wine, and that afterwards there +was found in the cask a little key tied to a thong of +leather, which had given to the wine a taste of both. +Now, whether this letter tasted of the leather of the +trunk or of the iron of Mr. Macpherson, I confess I<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_415" id="Page_415">{415}</a></span> +was a little out in my suggestion and my taste. The +letter in question was written by Hyder Beg Khân, +after Mr. Hastings's departure, to Mr. Macpherson, +when he succeeded to the government. That gentleman +thus got possession of a key to the trunk; and +it appears to have been his intentions to follow the +steps of his predecessor, to act exactly in the same +manner, and in the same manner to make the Nabob +the instrument of his own ruin. This letter was +written by the Nabob's minister to Sir John Macpherson, +newly inaugurated into his government, and +who might be supposed not to be acquainted with all +the best of Mr. Hastings's secrets, nor to have had all +the trunk correspondence put into his hands. However, +here is a trunk extraordinary, and its contents +are much in the manner of the other. The Nabob's +minister acquaints him with the whole secret of the +system. It is plain that the Nabob considered it as a +system not to be altered: that there was to be nothing +true, nothing aboveboard, nothing open in the +government of his affairs. When you thus see that +there can be little doubt of the true nature of the +government, I am sure that hereafter, when we come +to consider the effects of that government, it will +clear up and bring home to the prisoner at your bar +all we shall have to say upon this subject.</p> + +<p>Mr. Hastings, having thrown off completely the +authority of the Company, as you have seen,—having +trampled upon those of their servants who had +manifested any symptom of independence, or who +considered the orders of the Directors as a rule of +their conduct,—having brought every Englishman +under his yoke, and made them supple and fit instruments +for all his designs,—then gave it to be<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_416" id="Page_416">{416}</a></span> +understood that such alone were fit persons to be employed +in important affairs of state. Consider, my +Lords, the effect of this upon the whole service. +Not one man that appears to pay any regard to the +authority of the Directors is to expect that any regard +will be paid to himself. So that this man not +only rebels himself, in his own person, against the +authority of the Company, but he makes all their +servants join him in this very rebellion. Think, my +Lords, of this state of things,—and I wish it never +to pass from your minds that I have called him the +captain-general of the whole host of actors in Indian +iniquity, under whom that host was arrayed, disciplined, +and paid. This language which I used was +not, as fools have thought proper to call it, offensive +and abusive; it is in a proper criminatory tone, justified +by the facts that I have stated to you, and in +every step we take it is justified more and more. I +take it as a text upon which I mean to preach; I take +it as a text which I wish to have in your Lordships' +memory from the beginning to the end of this proceeding. +He is not only guilty of iniquity himself, but is +at the head of a system of iniquity and rebellion, and +will not suffer with impunity any one honest man +to exist in India, if he can help it. Every mark of +obedience to the legal authority of the Company is +by him condemned; and if there is any virtue remaining +in India, as I think there is, it is not his +fault that it still exists there.</p> + +<p>We have shown you the servile obedience of the +natives of the country; we have shown you the miserable +situation to which a great prince, at least a +person who was the other day a great prince, was +reduced by Mr. Hastings's system. We shall next<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_417" id="Page_417">{417}</a></span> +show you that this prince, who, unfortunately for +himself, became a dependant on the Company, and +thereby subjected to the will of an arbitrary government, +is made by him the instrument of his own degradation, +the instrument of his (the Governor's) +falsehoods, the instrument of his peculations; and +that he had been subjected to all this degradation for +the purposes of the most odious tyranny, violence, and +corruption.</p> + +<p>Mr. Hastings, having assumed the government to +himself, soon made Oude a private domain. It had, +to be sure, a public name, but it was to all practical +intents and purposes his park, or his warren,—a +place, as it were, for game, whence he drew out or +killed, at an earlier or later season, as he thought +fit, anything he liked, and brought it to his table according +as it served his purpose. Before I proceed, +it will not be improper for me to remind your Lordships +of the legitimate ends to which all controlling +and superintending power ought to be directed. +Whether a man acquires this power by law or by +usurpation, there are certain duties attached to his +station. Let us now see what these duties are.</p> + +<p>The first is, to take care of that vital principle +of every state, its revenue. The next is, to preserve +the magistracy and legal authorities in honor, +respect, and force. And the third, to preserve the +property, movable and immovable, of all the people +committed to his charge.</p> + +<p>In regard to his first duty, the protection of the +revenue, your Lordships will find, that, from three +millions and upwards which I stated to be the revenue +of Oude, and which Mr. Hastings, I believe, or +anybody for him, has never thought proper to deny,<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_418" id="Page_418">{418}</a></span> +it sunk under his management to about one million +four hundred and forty thousand pounds: and even +this, Mr. Middleton says, (as you may see in your +minutes,) was not completely realized. Thus, my +Lords, you see that one half of the whole revenue +of the country was lost after it came into Mr. Hastings's +management. Well, but it may perhaps be +said this was owing to the Nabob's own imprudence. +No such thing, my Lords; it could not be so; for +the whole <i>real</i> administration and government of the +country was in the hands of Mr. Hastings's agents, +public or private.</p> + +<p>To let you see how provident Mr. Hastings's management +of it was, I shall produce to your Lordships +one of the principal manoeuvres that he adopted +for the improvement of the revenue, and for the +happiness and prosperity of the country, the latter +of which will always go along, more or less, with the +first.</p> + +<p>The Nabob, whose acts your Lordships have now +learned to appreciate as no other than the acts of +Mr. Hastings, writes to the Council to have a body +of British officers, for the purposes of improving the +discipline of his troops, collecting his revenues, and +repressing disorder and outrage among his subjects. +This proposal was ostensibly fair and proper; and +if I had been in the Council at that time, and the +Nabob had really and <i>bonâ fide</i> made such a request, +I should have said he had taken a very reasonable +and judicious step, and that the Company ought to +aid him in his design.</p> + +<p>Among the officers sent to Oude, in consequence +of this requisition, was the well-known Colonel Hannay: +a man whose name will be bitterly and long<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_419" id="Page_419">{419}</a></span> +remembered in India. This person, we understand, +had been recommended to Mr. Hastings by Sir Elijah +Impey: and his appointment was the natural consequence +of such patronage. I say the natural consequence, +because Sir Elijah Impey appears on your +minutes to have been Mr. Hastings's private agent +and negotiator in Oude. In that light, and in that +light only, I consider Colonel Hannay in this business. +We cannot prove that he was not of Mr. Hastings's +own nomination originally and primarily; but +whether we take him in this way, or as recommended +by Sir Elijah Impey, or anybody else, Mr. Hastings +is equally responsible.</p> + +<p>Colonel Hannay is sent up by Mr. Hastings, and +has the command of a brigade, of two regiments I +think, given to him. Thus far all is apparently fair +and easily understood. But in this country we find +everything in masquerade and disguise. We find +this man, instead of being an officer, farmed the +revenue of the country, as is proved by Colonel +Lumsden and other gentlemen, who were his sub-farmers +and his assistants. Here, my Lords, we +have a man who appeared to have been sent up the +country as a commander of troops, agreeably to the +Nabob's request, and who, upon our inquiry, we discover +to have been farmer-general of the country! +We discover this with surprise; and I believe, till +our inquiries began, it was unknown in Europe. We +have, however, proved upon your Lordships' minutes, +by an evidence produced by Mr. Hastings himself, +that Colonel Hannay was actually farmer-general of +the countries of Baraitch and Goruckpore. We have +proved upon your minutes that Colonel Hannay was +the only person possessed of power in the country;<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_420" id="Page_420">{420}</a></span> +that there was no magistrate in it, nor any administration +of the law whatever. We have proved to your +Lordships that in his character of farmer-general +he availed himself of the influence derived from +commanding a battalion of soldiers. In short, we +have proved that the whole power, civil, military, +municipal, and financial, resided in him; and we +further refer your Lordships to Mr. Lumsden and +Mr. Halhed for the authority which he possessed +in that country. Your Lordships, I am sure, will +supply with your diligence what is defective in my +statement; I have therefore taken the liberty of indicating +to you where you are to find the evidence +to which I refer. You will there, my Lords, find +this Colonel Hannay in a false character: he is ostensibly +given to the Nabob as a commander of his +troops, while in reality he is forced upon that prince +as his farmer-general. He is invested with the whole +command of the country, while the sovereign is unable +to control him, or to prevent his extorting from +the people whatever he pleases.</p> + +<p>If we are asked what the terms of his farm +were, we cannot discover that he farmed the country +at any certain sum. We cannot discover that he +was subjected to any terms, or confined by any limitations. +Armed with arbitrary power, and exercising +that power under a false title, his exactions from +the poor natives were only limited by his own pleasure. +Under these circumstances, we are now to +ask what there was to prevent him from robbing and +ruining the people, and what security against his +robbing the exchequer of the person whose revenue +he farmed.</p> + +<p>You are told by the witnesses in the clearest man<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_421" id="Page_421">{421}</a></span>ner, +(and, after what you have heard of the state of +Oude, you cannot doubt the fact,) that nobody, not +even the Nabob, dared to complain against him,—that +he was considered as a man authorized and supported +by the power of the British government; and +it is proved in the evidence before you that he vexed +and harassed the country to the utmost extent +which we have stated in our article of charge, and +which you would naturally expect from a man acting +under such false names with such real powers. We +have proved that from some of the principal zemindars +in that country, who held farms let to them for +twenty-seven thousand rupees a year, a rent of sixty +thousand was demanded, and in some cases enforced,—and +that upon the refusal of one of them +to comply with this demand, he was driven out of +the country.</p> + +<p>Your Lordships will find in the evidence before +you that the inhabitants of the country were not only +harassed in their fortunes, but cruelly treated in their +persons. You have it upon Mr. Halhed's evidence, +and it is not attempted, that I know of, to be contradicted, +that the people were confined in open cages, +exposed to the scorching heat of the sun, for pretended +or real arrears of rent: it is indifferent which, +because I consider all confinement of the person to +support an arbitrary exaction to be an abomination +not to be tolerated. They have endeavored, indeed, +to weaken this evidence by an attempt to prove that +a man day and night in confinement in an open cage +suffers no inconvenience. And here I must beg +your Lordships to observe the extreme unwillingness +that appears in these witnesses. Their testimony is +drawn from them drop by drop, their answers to our<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_422" id="Page_422">{422}</a></span> +questions are never more than yes or no; but when +they are examined by the counsel on the other side, +it flows as freely as if drawn from a perennial spring: +and such a spring we have in Indian corruption. +We have, however, proved that in these cages the +renters were confined till they could be lodged in +the dungeons or mud forts. We have proved that +some of them were obliged to sell their children, that +others fled the country, and that these practices were +carried to such an awful extent that Colonel Hannay +was under the necessity of issuing orders against +the unnatural sale and flight which his rapacity had +occasioned.</p> + +<p>The prisoner's counsel have attempted to prove +that this had been a common practice in that country. +And though possibly some person as wicked +as Colonel Hannay might have been there before at +some time or other, no man ever sold his children +but under the pressure of some cruel exaction. Nature +calls out against it. The love that God has implanted +in the heart of parents towards their children +is the first germ of that second conjunction which +He has ordered to subsist between them and the rest +of mankind. It is the first formation and first bond +of society. It is stronger than all laws; for it is the +law of Nature, which is the law of God. Never did +a man sell his children who was able to maintain +them. It is, therefore, not only a proof of his exactions, +but a decisive proof that these exactions were +intolerable.</p> + +<p>Next to the love of parents for their children, the +strongest instinct, both natural and moral, that exists +in man, is the love of his country: an instinct, indeed, +which extends even to the brute creation. All<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_423" id="Page_423">{423}</a></span> +creatures love their offspring; next to that they love +their homes: they have a fondness for the place +where they have been bred, for the habitations they +have dwelt in, for the stalls in which they have been +fed, the pastures they have browsed in, and the wilds +in which they have roamed. We all know that the +natal soil has a sweetness in it beyond the harmony +of verse. This instinct, I say, that binds all creatures +to their country, never becomes inert in us, nor +ever suffers us to want a memory of it. Those, +therefore, who seek to fly their country can only wish +to fly from oppression: and what other proof can you +want of this oppression, when, as a witness has told +you, Colonel Hannay was obliged to put bars and +guards to confine the inhabitants within the country?</p> + +<p>We have seen, therefore, Nature violated in its +strongest principles. We have seen unlimited and +arbitrary exaction avowed, on no pretence of any law, +rule, or any fixed mode by which these people were +to be dealt with. All these facts have been proved +before your Lordships by costive and unwilling witnesses. +In consequence of these violent and cruel +oppressions, a general rebellion breaks out in the +country, as was naturally to be expected. The inhabitants +rise as if by common consent; every farmer, +every proprietor of land, every man who loved +his family and his country, and had not fled for refuge, +rose in rebellion, as they call it. My Lords, +they did rebel; it was a just rebellion. Insurrection +was there just and legal, inasmuch as Colonel Hannay, +in defiance of the laws and rights of the people, +exercised a clandestine, illegal authority, against +which there can be no rebellion in its proper sense.</p> + +<p>As a rebellion, however, and as a rebellion of the<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_424" id="Page_424">{424}</a></span> +most unprovoked kind, it was treated by Colonel +Hannay; and to one instance of the means taken +for suppressing it, as proved by evidence before your +Lordships, I will just beg leave to call your attention. +One hundred and fifty of the inhabitants had been +shut up in one of the mud forts I have mentioned. +The people of the country, in their rage, attacked the +fort, and demanded the prisoners; they called for +their brothers, their fathers, their husbands, who +were confined there. It was attacked by the joint +assault of men and women. The man who commanded +in the fort immediately cut off the heads of +eighteen of the principal prisoners, and tossed them +over the battlements to the assailants. There happened +to be a prisoner in the fort, a man loved +and respected in his country, and who, whether justly +or unjustly, was honored and much esteemed by +all the people. "Give us our Rajah, Mustapha +Khân!" (that was the name of the man confined,) +cried out the assailants. We asked the witness at +your bar what he was confined for. He did not +know; but he said that Colonel Hannay had confined +him, and added, that he was sentenced to death. +We desired to see the <i>fetwah</i>, or decree, of the judge +who sentenced him. No,—no such thing, nor any +evidence of its having ever existed, could be produced. +We desired to know whether he could give +any account of the process, any account of the magistrate, +any account of the accuser, any account of +the defence,—in short, whether he could give any +account whatever of this man's being condemned to +death. He could give no account of it, but the orders +of Colonel Hannay, who seems to have imprisoned +and condemned him by his own arbitrary will.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_425" id="Page_425">{425}</a></span> +Upon the demand of Rajah Mustapha by the insurgents +being made known to Colonel Hannay, he +sends an order to the commander of the fort, a man +already stained with the blood of all the people who +were murdered there, that, if he had not executed +Mustapha Khân, he should execute him immediately. +The man is staggered at the order, and refuses to +execute it, as not being directly addressed to him. +Colonel Hannay then sends a Captain Williams, who +has appeared here as an evidence at your bar, and +who, together with Captain Gordon and Major Macdonald, +both witnesses also here, were all sub-farmers +and actors under Colonel Hannay. This Captain +Williams, I say, goes there, and, without asking one +of those questions which I put to the witness at your +bar, and desiring nothing but Colonel Hannay's +word, orders the man to be beheaded; and accordingly +he was beheaded, agreeably to the orders of +Colonel Hannay. Upon this, the rebellion blazed out +with tenfold fury, and the people declared they would +be revenged for the destruction of their zemindar.</p> + +<p>Your Lordships have now seen this Mustapha +Khân imprisoned and sentenced to death by Colonel +Hannay, without judge and without accuser, without +any evidence, without the <i>fetwah</i>, or any sentence of +the law. This man is thus put to death by an arbitrary +villain, by a more than cruel tyrant, Colonel +Hannay, the substitute of a ten thousand times more +cruel tyrant, Mr. Hastings.</p> + +<p>In this situation was the country of Oude, under +Colonel Hannay, when he was removed from it. +The knowledge of his misconduct had before induced +the miserable Nabob to make an effort to get rid of +him; but Mr. Hastings had repressed that effort by<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_426" id="Page_426">{426}</a></span> +a civil reprimand,—telling him, indeed, at the same +time, "I do not force you to receive him." (Indeed, +the Nabob's situation had in it force enough.) The +Nabob, I say, was forced to receive him; and again +he ravages and destroys that devoted country, till the +time of which I have been just speaking, when he +was driven out of it finally by the rebellion, and, as +you may imagine, departed like a leech full of blood.</p> + +<p>It is stated in evidence upon your minutes that +this bloated leech went back to Calcutta; that he was +supposed, from a state of debt, (in which he was +known to have been when he left that city,) to have +returned from Oude with the handsome sum of 300,000<i>l.</i>, +of which 80,000<i>l.</i> was in gold mohurs. This +is declared to be the universal opinion in India, and +no man has ever contradicted it. Ten persons have +given evidence to that effect; not one has contradicted +it, from that hour to this, that I ever heard of. +The man is now no more. Whether his family have +the whole of the plunder or not,—what partnership +there was in this business,—what shares, what dividends +were made, and who got them,—about all +this public opinion varied, and we can with certainty +affirm nothing; but there ended the life and exploits +of Colonel Hannay, farmer-general, civil officer, and +military commander of Baraitch and Goruckpore. +But not so ended Mr. Hastings's proceedings.</p> + +<p>Soon after the return of Colonel Hannay to +Calcutta, this miserable Nabob received intelligence, +which concurrent public fame supported, that Mr. +Hastings meant to send him up into the country again, +on a second expedition, probably with some such order +as this:—"You have sucked blood enough for +yourself, now try what you can do for your neigh<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_427" id="Page_427">{427}</a></span>bors." +The Nabob was not likely to be misinformed. +His friend and agent, Gobind Ram, was at Calcutta, +and had constant access to all Mr. Hastings's people. +Mr. Hastings himself tells you what instructions +these vakeels always have to search into and discover +all his transactions. This Gobind Ram, alarmed +with strong apprehensions, and struck with horror at +the very idea of such an event, apprised his master +of his belief that Mr. Hastings meant to send Colonel +Hannay again into the country. Judge now, my +lords, what Colonel Hannay must have been, from +the declaration which I will now read to you, extorted +from that miserable slave, the Nabob, who thus +addresses Mr. Hastings.</p> + +<p>"My country and house belong to you; there is no +difference. I hope that you desire in your heart the +good of my concerns. Colonel Hannay is inclined +to request your permission to be employed in the +affairs of this quarter. If by any means any matter +of this country dependent on me should be intrusted +to the Colonel, I swear by the Holy Prophet, that I +will not remain here, but will go from hence to you. +From your kindness let no concern dependent on +me be intrusted to the Colonel, and oblige me by a +speedy answer which may set my mind at ease."</p> + +<p>We know very well that the prisoner at your bar +denied his having any intention to send him up. +We cannot prove them, but we maintain that there +were grounds for the strongest suspicions that he +entertained such intentions. He cannot deny the +reality of this terror which existed in the minds of +the Nabob and his people, under the apprehension +that he was to be sent up, which plainly showed that +they at least considered there was ground enough for<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_428" id="Page_428">{428}</a></span> +charging him with that intention. What reason was +there to think that he should not be sent a third +time, who had been sent twice before? Certainly, +none; because every circumstance of Mr. Hastings's +proceedings was systematical, and perfectly well +known at Oude.</p> + +<p>But suppose it to have been a false report; it +shows all that the Managers wish to show, the +extreme terror which these creatures and tools of +Mr. Hastings struck into the people of that country. +His denial of any intention of again sending Colonel +Hannay does not disprove either the justness of their +suspicions or the existence of the terror which his +very name excited.</p> + +<p>My Lords, I shall now call your attention to a part +of the evidence which we have produced to prove the +terrible effects of Colonel Hannay's operations. Captain +Edwards, an untainted man, who tells you that +he had passed through that country again and again, +describes it as bearing all the marks of savage desolation. +Mr. Holt says it has fallen from its former +state,—that whole towns and villages were no longer +peopled, and that the country carried evident marks +of famine. One would have thought that Colonel +Hannay's cruelty and depredations would have satiated +Mr. Hastings. No: he finds another military +collector, a Major Osborne, who, having suffered +in his preferment by the sentence of a court-martial, +whether justly or unjustly I neither know nor care, +was appointed to the command of a thousand men in +the provinces of Oude, but really to the administration +of the revenues of the country. He administered +them much in the same manner as Colonel +Hannay had done. He, however, transmitted to the<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_429" id="Page_429">{429}</a></span> +government at Calcutta a partial representation of +the state of the provinces, the substance of which +was, that the natives were exposed to every kind of +peculation, and that the country was in a horrible +state of confusion and disorder. This is upon the +Company's records; and although not produced in +evidence, your Lordships may find it, for it has been +printed over and over again. This man went up to +the Vizier; in consequence of whose complaint, and +the renewed cries of the people, Mr. Hastings was +soon obliged to recall him.</p> + +<p>But, my Lords, let us go from Major Osborne to +the rest of these military purveyors of revenue. +Your Lordships shall hear the Vizier's own account +of what he suffered from British officers, and into +what a state Mr. Hastings brought that country by +the agency of officers who, under the pretence of defending +it, were invested with powers which enabled +them to commit most horrible abuses in the administration +of the revenue, the collection of customs, and +the monopoly of the markets.</p> + +<div class="blockquote"> +<p class="center"><i>Copy of a Letter from the Nabob Vizier to the Governor-General.</i></p> + +<p>"All the officers stationed with the brigade at +Cawnpore, Futtyghur, Darunghur, and Furruckabad, +and other places, write purwannahs, and give positive +orders to the aumils of these places, respecting the +grain, &c.; from which conduct the country will become +depopulate. I am hopeful from your friendship +that you will write to all these gentlemen +not to issue orders, &c., to the aumils, and not to +send troops into the mahals of the sircar; and for +whatever quantity of grain, &c., they may want, they<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_430" id="Page_430">{430}</a></span> +will inform me and the Resident, and we will write +it to the aumils, who shall cause it to be sent them +every month, and I will deduct the price of them +from the tuncaws: this will be agreeable both to me +and to the ryots."</p> + + +<p class="center"><i>A Copy of a subsequent Letter from the Vizier to Rajah +Gobind Ram</i>.</p> + +<p>"I some time ago wrote you the particulars of the +conduct of the officers, and now write them again. +The officers and gentlemen who are at Cawnpore, +and Futtyghur, and Darunghur, and other places, by +different means act very tyrannically and oppressively +towards the aumils and ryots and inhabitants; +and to whomsoever that requires a dustuck they +give it, with their own seal affixed, and send for the +aumils and punish them. If they say anything, +the gentlemen make use of but two words: one,—<i>That +is for the brigade;</i> and the second,—<i>That is +to administer justice</i>. The particulars of it is this,—that +the byparees will bring their grain from all +quarters, and sell for their livelihood. There is at +present no war to occasion a necessity for sending for +it. If none comes, whatever quantity will be necessary +every month I will mention to the aumils, that +they may bring it for sale: but there is no deficiency +of grain. The gentlemen have established gunges +for their own advantage, called Colonel Gunge, at +Darunghur, Futtyghur, &c. The collection of the +customs from all quarters they have stopped, and +collected them at their own gunges. Each gunge +is rented out at 30,000-40,000 rupees, and their +collections paid to the gentlemen. They have established +gunges where there never were any, and<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_431" id="Page_431">{431}</a></span> +where they were, those they have abolished; 30,000 or +40,000 rupees is the sum they are rented at; the collections, +to the amount of a lac of rupees, are stopped. +Major Briscoe, who is at Darunghur, has established +a gunge which rented out for 45,000 rupees, and has +stopped the ghauts round about the byparees; and +merchants coming from Cashmere, from Shahjehanabad, +and bringing shawls and other goods and spices, +&c., from all quarters, he orders to his gunge, +and collects the duty from the aumils, gives them a +chit, and a guard, who conducts them about five +hundred coss: the former duties are not collected. +From the conduct at Cawnpore, Futtyghur, Furruckabad, +&c., the duties from the lilla of Gora and +Thlawa are destroyed, and occasion a loss of three +lacs of rupees to the duties; and the losses that +are sustained in Furruckabad may be ascertained by +the Nabob Muzuffer Jung, to whom every day complaints +are made: exclusive of the aumils and collectors, +others lodge complaints. Whatever I do, I desire +no benefit from it; I am remediless and silent; +from what happens to me, I know that worse will +happen in other places; the second word, I know, is +from their mouths only. This is the case. In this +country formerly, and even now, whatever is to be +received or paid among the zemindars, ryots, and inhabitants +of the cities, and poor people, neither those +who can pay or those who cannot pay ever make any +excuse to the shroffs; but when they could pay, they +did. In old debts of fifty years, whoever complain +to the gentlemen, they agree that they shall pay one +fourth, and send dustucks and sepoys to all the +aumils, the chowdries, and canongoes, and inhabitants +of all the towns; they send for everybody, to do<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_432" id="Page_432">{432}</a></span> +them justice, confine them, and say they will settle +the business. So many and numerous are these +calamities, that I know not how much room it will +take up to mention them. Mr. Briscoe is at Darunghur; +and the complaints of the aumils arrive daily. +I am silent. Now Mr. Middleton is coming here, let +the Nabob appoint him for settling all these affairs, +that whatever he shall order those gentlemen they +will do. From this everything will be settled, and +the particulars of this quarter will be made known to +the Nabob. I have written this, which you will deliver +to the Governor, that everything may be settled; +and when he has understood it, whatever is his inclination, +he will favor me with it. The Nabob is +master in this country, and is my friend; there is no +distinction."</p> + + +<p class="center"><i>Copy of another Letter, entered upon the Consultation +of the 4th of June, 1781.</i></p> + +<p>"I have received your letter, requesting leave for +a battalion to be raised by Captain Clark on the +same footing as Major Osborne's was, agreeable to the +requests and complaints of Ishmael Beg, the aumil +of Allahabad, &c., and in compliance with the directions +of the Council. You are well acquainted with +the particulars and negotiation of Ishmael Beg, and +the nature of Mr. Osborne's battalion. At the beginning +of the year 1186 (1779) the affairs of Allahabad +were given on a lease of three years to Ishmael Beg, +together with the purgunnahs Arreel and Parra; +and I gave orders for troops to be stationed and +raised, conformable to his request. Ishmael Beg +accordingly collected twelve hundred peons, which +were not allowed to the aumil of that place in the<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_433" id="Page_433">{433}</a></span> +year 1185. The reason why I gave permission for +the additional expense of twelve hundred peons was, +that he might be enabled to manage the country +with ease, and pay the money to government regularly. +I besides sent Mr. Osborne there to command in +the mahals belonging to Allahabad, which were in the +possession of Rajah Ajeet Sing; and he accordingly +took charge. Afterwards, in obedience to the orders +of the Governor-General, Mr. Hastings, Jelladut +Jung, he was recalled, and the mahals placed, +as before, under Rajah Ajeet Sing. I never sent +Mr. Osborne to settle the concerns of Allahabad, for +there was no occasion for him; but Mr. Osborne, of +himself, committed depredations and rapines within +Ishmael Beg's jurisdiction. Last year, the battalion, +which, by permission of General Sir Eyre Coote, was +sent, received orders to secure and defend Ishmael +Beg against the encroachments of Mr. Osborne; for +the complaints of Ishmael Beg against the violences +of Mr. Osborne had reached the General and Mr. +Purling; and the Governor and gentlemen of Council, +at my request, recalled Mr. Osborne. This year, +as before, the collections of Arreel and Parra remain +under Ishmael Beg. In those places, some of the +talookdars and zemindars, who had been oppressed +and ill-treated by Mr. Osborne, had conceived ideas +of rebellion."</p> +</div> + +<p>Here, my Lords, you have an account of the condition +of Darunghur, Futtyghur, Furruckabad, and +of the whole line of our military stations in the Nabob's +dominions. You see the whole was one universal +scene of plunder and rapine. You see all +this was known to Mr. Hastings, who never inflicted<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_434" id="Page_434">{434}</a></span> +any punishments for all this horrible outrage. You +see the utmost he has done is merely to recall one +man, Major Osborne, who was by no means the only +person deeply involved in these charges. He nominated +all these people; he has never called any of +them to an account. Shall I not, then, call him their +captain-general? Shall not your Lordships call him +so? And shall any man in the kingdom call him +by any other name? We see all the executive, all +the civil and criminal justice of the country seized +on by him. We see the trade and all the duties +seized upon by his creatures. We see them destroying +established markets, and creating others at their +pleasure. We see them, in the country of an ally +and in a time of peace, producing all the consequences +of rapine and of war. We see the country +ruined and depopulated by men who attempt to exculpate +themselves by charging their unhappy victims +with rebellion.</p> + +<p>And now, my Lords, who is it that has brought +to light all these outrages and complaints, the existence +of which has never been denied, and for +which no redress was ever obtained, and no punishment +ever inflicted? Why, Mr. Hastings himself has +brought them before you; they are found in papers +which he has transmitted. God, who inflicts blindness +upon great criminals, in order that they should +meet with the punishment they deserve, has made him +the means of bringing forward this scene, which we +are maliciously said to have falsely and maliciously +devised. If any one of the ravages [charges?] contained +in that long catalogue of grievances is false, +Warren Hastings is the person who must answer for +that individual falsehood. If they are generally false,<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_435" id="Page_435">{435}</a></span> +he is to answer for the false and calumniating accusation; +and if they are true, my Lords, he only is +answerable, for he appointed those ministers of outrage, +and never called them to account for their misconduct.</p> + +<p>Let me now show your Lordships the character +that Mr. Hastings gives of all the British officers. +It is to be found in an extract from the Appendix +to that part of his Benares Narrative in which he +comments upon the treaty of Chunar. Mark, my +Lords, what the man himself says of the whole military +service.</p> + +<p>"Notwithstanding the great benefit which the Company +would have derived from such an augmentation +of their military force as these troops constituted, +ready to act on any emergency, prepared and disciplined +without any charge on the Company, as the +institution professed, until their actual services should +be required, I have observed some evils growing out +of the system, which, in my opinion, more than counterbalanced +those advantages, had they been realized +in their fullest effect. The remote stations of these +troops, placing the commanding officers beyond the +notice and control of the board, afforded too much opportunity +and temptation for unwarrantable emoluments, +and excited the contagion of peculation and +rapacity throughout the whole army. A most remarkable +and incontrovertible proof of the prevalence +of this spirit has been seen in the court-martial upon +Captain Erskine, where the court, composed of officers +of rank and respectable characters, unanimously +and honorably, most honorably, acquitted him upon +an acknowledged fact which in times of stricter discipline +would have been deemed a crime deserving +the severest punishment."<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_436" id="Page_436">{436}</a></span></p> + +<p>I will now call your Lordships' attention to another +extract from the same comment of Mr. Hastings, with +respect to the removal of the Company's servants, +civil and military, from the court and service of the +Vizier.</p> + +<p>"I was actuated solely by motives of justice to him +and a regard to the honor of our national character. +In removing those gentlemen I diminish my own influence, +as well as that of my colleagues, by narrowing +the line of patronage; and I expose myself to obloquy +and resentment from those who are immediately affected +by the arrangement, and the long train of +their friends and powerful patrons. But their numbers, +their influence, and the enormous amount of +their salaries, pensions, and emoluments, were an intolerable +burden on the revenues and authority of the +Vizier, and exposed us to the envy and resentment +of the whole country, by excluding the native servants +and adherents of the Vizier from the rewards +of their services and attachment."</p> + +<p>My Lords, you have here Mr. Hastings's opinion +of the whole military service. You have here the +authority and documents by which he supports his +opinion. He states that the contagion of peculation +had tainted all the frontier stations, which contain +much the largest part of the Company's army. +He states that this contagion had tainted the whole +army, <i>everywhere:</i> so that, according to him, there +was, throughout the Indian army, an universal taint +of peculation. My Lords, peculation is not a military +vice. Insubordination, want of attention to duty, +want of order, want of obedience and regularity, +are military vices; but who ever before heard of peculation +being a military vice? In the case before you,<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_437" id="Page_437">{437}</a></span> +it became so by employing military men as farmers +of revenue, as masters of markets and of gunges. +This departure from the military character and from +military duties introduced that peculation which +tainted the army, and desolated the dominions of +the Nabob Vizier.</p> + +<p>I declare, when I first read the passage which has +been just read to your Lordships, in the infancy of +this inquiry, it struck me with astonishment that +peculation should <i>at all</i> exist as a military vice; but +I was still more astonished at finding Warren Hastings +charging the <i>whole</i> British army with being corrupted +by this base and depraved spirit, to a degree +which tainted even their judicial character. This, my +Lords, is a most serious matter. The judicial functions +of military men are of vast importance in themselves; +and, generally speaking, there is not any tribunal +whose members are more honorable in their +conduct and more just in their decisions than those +of a court-martial. Perhaps there is not a tribunal +in this country whose reputation is really more untainted +than that of a court-martial. It stands as +fair, in the opinion both of the army and of the +public, as any tribunal, in a country where <i>all</i> tribunals +stand fair. But in India, this unnatural vice +of peculation, which has no more to do with the +vices of a military character than with its virtues, +this venomous spirit, has pervaded the members of +military tribunals to such an extent, that they acquit, +honorably acquit, <i>most</i> honorably acquit a man, "upon +an acknowledged fact which in times of stricter +discipline would have been deemed a crime deserving +the severest punishment."</p> + +<p>Who says all this, my Lords? Do I say it? No:<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_438" id="Page_438">{438}</a></span> +it is Warren Hastings who says it. He records it. +He gives you his vouchers and his evidence, and he +draws the conclusion. He is the criminal accuser +of the British army. He who sits in that box accuses +the whole British army in India. He has declared +them to be so tainted with peculation, from head +to foot, as to have been induced to commit the most +wicked perjuries, for the purpose of bearing one another +out in their abominable peculations. In this +unnatural state of things, and whilst there is not +one military man on these stations of whom Mr. +Hastings does not give this abominably flagitious +character, yet every one of them have joined to give +him the benefit of their testimony for his honorable +intentions and conduct.</p> + +<p>In this tremendous scene, which he himself exposes, +are there no signs of this captain-generalship +which I have alluded to? Are there no signs of +this man's being a captain-general of iniquity, under +whom all the spoilers of India were paid, disciplined, +and supported? I not only charge him with being +guilty of a thousand crimes, but I assert that there +is not a soldier or a civil servant in India whose +culpable acts are not owing to this man's example, +connivance, and protection. Everything which +goes to criminate them goes directly against the prisoner. +He puts them in a condition to plunder; he +suffered no native authority or government to restrain +them; and he never called a man to an account for +these flagitious acts which he has thought proper to +bring before his country in the most solemn manner +and upon the most solemn occasion.</p> + +<p>I verily believe, in my conscience, his accusation +is not true, in the excess, in the generality and ex<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_439" id="Page_439">{439}</a></span>travagance +in which he charges it. That it is true +in a great measure we cannot deny; and in that +measure we, in our turn, charge him with being +the author of all the crimes which he denounces; +and if there is anything in the charge beyond the +truth, it is he who is to answer for the falsehood.</p> + +<p>I will now refer your Lordships to his opinion +of the civil service, as it is declared and recorded +in his remarks upon the removal of the Company's +civil servants by him from the service of the Vizier.—"I +was," says he, "actuated solely by motives of +justice to him [the Nabob of Oude], and a regard to +the honor of our national character."—Here, you +see, he declares his opinion that in Oude the civil +servants of the Company had destroyed the national +character, and that therefore they ought to be recalled.—"By +removing these people," he adds, "I +diminish my patronage."—But I ask, How came +they there? Why, through this patronage. He +sent them there to suck the blood which the military +had spared. He sent these civil servants to +do ten times more mischief than the military ravagers +could do, because they were invested with +greater authority.—"If," says he, "I recall them +from thence, I lessen my patronage."—But who, +my Lords, authorized him to become a patron? +What laws of his country justified him in forcing +upon the Vizier the civil servants of the Company? +What treaty authorized him to do it? What system +of policy, except his own wicked, arbitrary system, +authorized him to act thus?</p> + +<p>He proceeds to say, "I expose myself to obloquy +and resentment from those who are immediately affected +by the arrangement, and the long train of their<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_440" id="Page_440">{440}</a></span> +friends and powerful patrons."—My Lords, it is the +constant burden of his song, that he cannot do his +duty, that he is fettered in everything, that he fears +a thousand mischiefs to happen to him,—not from +his acting with carefulness, economy, frugality, and +in obedience to the laws of his country, but from the +very reverse of all this. Says he, "I am afraid I +shall forfeit the favor of the powerful patrons of those +servants in England, namely, the Lords and Commons +of England, if I do justice to the suffering people +of this country."</p> + +<p>In the House of Commons there are undoubtedly +powerful people who may be supposed to be influenced +by patronage; but the higher and more powerful +part of the country is more directly represented +by your Lordships than by us, although we have of +the first blood of England in the House of Commons. +We do, indeed, represent, by the knights of the +shires, the landed interest; by our city and borough +members we represent the trading interest; we +represent the whole people of England collectively. +But neither blood nor power is represented so fully +in the House of Commons as that order which +composes the great body of the people,—the protection +of which is our peculiar duty, and to which it is +our glory to adhere. But the dignities of the country, +the great and powerful, are represented eminently +by your Lordships. As we, therefore, would keep +the lowest of the people from the contagion and dishonor +of peculation and corruption, and above all +from exercising that vice which, among commoners, +is unnatural as well as abominable, the vice of tyranny +and oppression, so we trust that your Lordships +will clear yourselves and the higher and more power<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_441" id="Page_441">{441}</a></span>ful +ranks from giving the smallest countenance to the +system which we have done our duty in denouncing +and bringing before you.</p> + +<p>My Lords, you have heard the account of the civil +service. Think of their numbers, think of their +influence, and the enormous amount of their salaries, +pensions, and emoluments! They were, you +have heard, an intolerable burden on the revenues +and authority of the Vizier; and they exposed us to +the envy and resentment of the whole country, by +excluding the native servants and adherents of the +prince from the just reward of their services and +attachments. Here, my Lords, is the whole civil service +brought before you. They usurp the country, +they destroy the revenues, they overload the prince, +and they exclude all the nobility and eminent persons +of the country from the just reward of their service.</p> + +<p>Did Mr. Francis, whom I saw here a little while +ago, send these people into that country? Did +General Clavering, or Colonel Monson, whom he +charges with this system, send them there? No, +they were sent by himself; and if one was sent by +anybody else for a time, he was soon recalled: so +that he is himself answerable for all the peculation +which he attributes to the civil service. You see the +character given of that service; you there see their +accuser, you there see their defender, who, after having +defamed both services, military and civil, never +punished the guilty in either, and now receives the +prodigal praises of both.</p> + +<p>I defy the ingenuity of man to show that Mr. Hastings +is not the defamer of the service. I defy the +ingenuity of man to show that the honor of Great +Britain has not been tarnished under his patronage.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_442" id="Page_442">{442}</a></span> +He engaged to remove all these bloodsuckers by the +treaty of Chunar; but he never executed that treaty. +He proposed to take away the temporary brigade; +but he again established it. He redressed no grievance; +he formed no improvements in the government; +he never attempted to provide a remedy +without increasing the evil tenfold. He was the +primary and sole cause of all the grievances, civil +and military, to which the unhappy natives of that +country were exposed; and he was the accuser of +all the immediate authors of those grievances, without +having punished any one of them. He is the +accuser of them all. But the only person whom he +attempted to punish was that man who dared to +assert the authority of the Court of Directors, and +to claim an office assigned to him by them.</p> + +<p>I will now read to your Lordships the protest of +General Clavering against the military brigade.—"Taking +the army from the Nabob is an infringement +of the rights of an independent prince, leaving +only the name and title of it without the power. It +is taking his subjects from him, against every law of +Nature and of nations."</p> + +<p>I will next read to your Lordships a minute of Mr. +Francis's.—"By the foregoing letter from Mr. Middleton +it appears that he has taken the government +of the Nabob's dominions directly upon himself. I +was not a party to the resolutions which preceded +that measure, and will not be answerable for the +consequences of it."</p> + +<p>The next paper I will read is one introduced by the +Managers, to prove that a representation was made by +the Nabob respecting the expenses of the gentlemen +resident at his court, and written after the removal +before mentioned.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_443" id="Page_443">{443}</a></span></p> + +<div class="blockquote"> +<p class="center"><i>Extract of a Letter from the Vizier to Mr. Macpherson, +received the 21st April, 1785.</i></p> + +<p>"With respect to the expenses of the gentlemen +who are here, I have before written in a covered manner; +I now write plainly, that I have no ability to +give money to the gentlemen, because I am indebted +many lacs of rupees to the bankers for the payment +of the Company's debt. At the time of Mr. Hastings's +departure, I represented to him that I had no +resources for the expenses of the gentlemen. Mr. +Hastings, having ascertained my distressed situation, +told me that after his arrival in Calcutta he would +consult with the Council, and remove from hence the +expenses of the gentlemen, and recall every person +except the gentlemen in office here. At this time +that all the concerns are dependent upon you, and +you have in every point given ease to my mind, +according to Mr. Hastings's agreement, I hope that +the expenses of the gentlemen maybe removed from +me, and that you may recall every person residing +here beyond the gentlemen in office. Although Major +Palmer does not at this time demand anything +for the gentlemen, and I have no ability to give them +anything, yet the custom of the English gentlemen is, +when they remain here, they will in the end ask for +something. This is best, that they should be recalled."</p> +</div> + +<p>I think so, too; and your Lordships will think so +with me; but Mr. Hastings, who says that he himself +thought thus in September, 1781, and engaged to recall +these gentlemen, was so afraid of their powerful +friends and patrons here, that he left India, and<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_444" id="Page_444">{444}</a></span> +left all that load of obloquy upon his successors. He +left a Major Palmer there, in the place of a Resident: +a Resident of his own, as your Lordships must see; +for Major Palmer was no Resident of the Company's. +This man received a salary of about 23,000<i>l.</i> +a year, which he declared to be less than his expenses; +by which we may easily judge of the enormous salaries +of those who make their fortunes there. He was +left by Mr. Hastings as his representative of peculation, +his representative of tyranny. He was the +second agent appointed to control all power ostensible +and unostensible, and to head these gentlemen +whose "custom," the Nabob says, "was in the end +to ask for money." Money they must have; and +there, my Lords, is the whole secret.</p> + +<hr style='width: 45%;' /> + +<p>I have this day shown your Lordships the entire +dependence of Oude on the British empire. I have +shown you how Mr. Hastings usurped all power, reduced +the prince to a cipher, and made of his minister +a mere creature of his own,—how he made the +servants of the Company dependent on his own arbitrary +will, and considered independence a proof of +corruption. It has been likewise proved to your +Lordships that he suffered the army to become an +instrument of robbery and oppression, and one of its +officers to be metamorphosed into a farmer-general to +waste the country and embezzle its revenues. You +have seen a clandestine and fraudulent system, occasioning +violence and rapine; and you have seen +the prisoner at the bar acknowledging and denouncing +an abandoned spirit of rapacity without bringing +its ministers to justice, and pleading as his excuse +the fear of offending your Lordships and the<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_445" id="Page_445">{445}</a></span> +House of Commons. We have shown you the government, +revenue, commerce, and agriculture of +Oude ruined and destroyed by Mr. Hastings and his +creatures. And to wind up all, we have shown you +an army so corrupted as to pervert the fundamental +principles of justice, which are the elements and +basis of military discipline. All this, I say, we have +shown you; and I cannot believe that your Lordships +will consider that we have trifled with your +time, or strained our comments one jot beyond the +strict measure of the text. We have shown you a +horrible scene, arising from an astonishing combination +of horrible circumstances. The order in which +you will consider these circumstances must be left +to your Lordships.</p> + +<p>At present I am not able to proceed further. My +next attempt will be to bring before you the manner +in which Mr. Hastings treated movable and immovable +property in Oude, and by which he has left nothing +undestroyed in that devoted country.</p> + +<hr style="width: 65%;" /> + +<h3>END OF VOL. XI.</h3> + + + + + + + + + +<pre> + + + + + +End of the Project Gutenberg EBook of The Works of the Right Honourable +Edmund Burke, Vol. XI. (of 12), by Edmund Burke + +*** END OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE WORKS OF THE RIGHT *** + +***** This file should be named 18218-h.htm or 18218-h.zip ***** +This and all associated files of various formats will be found in: + http://www.gutenberg.org/1/8/2/1/18218/ + +Produced by Paul Murray, Susan Skinner and the Online +Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net (This +file was produced from images generously made available +by the Bibliothèque nationale de France (BnF/Gallica) at +http://gallica.bnf.fr) + + +Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions +will be renamed. + +Creating the works from public domain print editions means that no +one owns a United States copyright in these works, so the Foundation +(and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United States without +permission and without paying copyright royalties. Special rules, +set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license, apply to +copying and distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works to +protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm concept and trademark. Project +Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if you +charge for the eBooks, unless you receive specific permission. If you +do not charge anything for copies of this eBook, complying with the +rules is very easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose +such as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and +research. They may be modified and printed and given away--you may do +practically ANYTHING with public domain eBooks. Redistribution is +subject to the trademark license, especially commercial +redistribution. + + + +*** START: FULL LICENSE *** + +THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE +PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK + +To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free +distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work +(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project +Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full Project +Gutenberg-tm License (available with this file or online at +http://gutenberg.org/license). + + +Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic works + +1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to +and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property +(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all +the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or destroy +all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your possession. +If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the +terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or +entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8. + +1.B. "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark. It may only be +used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who +agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few +things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works +even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See +paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement +and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works. See paragraph 1.E below. + +1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the Foundation" +or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection of Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic works. Nearly all the individual works in the +collection are in the public domain in the United States. If an +individual work is in the public domain in the United States and you are +located in the United States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from +copying, distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative +works based on the work as long as all references to Project Gutenberg +are removed. Of course, we hope that you will support the Project +Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting free access to electronic works by +freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm works in compliance with the terms of +this agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with +the work. You can easily comply with the terms of this agreement by +keeping this work in the same format with its attached full Project +Gutenberg-tm License when you share it without charge with others. + +1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern +what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are in +a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States, check +the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this agreement +before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, distributing or +creating derivative works based on this work or any other Project +Gutenberg-tm work. The Foundation makes no representations concerning +the copyright status of any work in any country outside the United +States. + +1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg: + +1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate +access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear prominently +whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work on which the +phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the phrase "Project +Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed, viewed, +copied or distributed: + +This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with +almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or +re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included +with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org + +1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is derived +from the public domain (does not contain a notice indicating that it is +posted with permission of the copyright holder), the work can be copied +and distributed to anyone in the United States without paying any fees +or charges. If you are redistributing or providing access to a work +with the phrase "Project Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the +work, you must comply either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1 +through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the +Project Gutenberg-tm trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or +1.E.9. + +1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted +with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution +must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any additional +terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms will be linked +to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works posted with the +permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of this work. + +1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm +License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this +work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm. + +1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this +electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without +prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with +active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project +Gutenberg-tm License. + +1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary, +compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including any +word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access to or +distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format other than +"Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official version +posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm web site (www.gutenberg.org), +you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a +copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon +request, of the work in its original "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other +form. Any alternate format must include the full Project Gutenberg-tm +License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1. + +1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying, +performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works +unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9. + +1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing +access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works provided +that + +- You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from + the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method + you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is + owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he + has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the + Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments + must be paid within 60 days following each date on which you + prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your periodic tax + returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked as such and + sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the + address specified in Section 4, "Information about donations to + the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation." + +- You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies + you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he + does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm + License. You must require such a user to return or + destroy all copies of the works possessed in a physical medium + and discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of + Project Gutenberg-tm works. + +- You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any + money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the + electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days + of receipt of the work. + +- You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free + distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works. + +1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set +forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from +both the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and Michael +Hart, the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark. Contact the +Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below. + +1.F. + +1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable +effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread +public domain works in creating the Project Gutenberg-tm +collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may contain +"Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or +corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual +property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other medium, a +computer virus, or computer codes that damage or cannot be read by +your equipment. + +1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right +of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project +Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project +Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all +liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal +fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT +LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE +PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH F3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE +TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE +LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR +INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH +DAMAGE. + +1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a +defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can +receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a +written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you +received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium with +your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you with +the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu of a +refund. If you received the work electronically, the person or entity +providing it to you may choose to give you a second opportunity to +receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If the second copy +is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing without further +opportunities to fix the problem. + +1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth +in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS', WITH NO OTHER +WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO +WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTIBILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE. + +1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied +warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages. +If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the +law of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be +interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by +the applicable state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any +provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions. + +1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the +trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone +providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in accordance +with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the production, +promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works, +harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees, +that arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do +or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg-tm +work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or deletions to any +Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any Defect you cause. + + +Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm + +Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of +electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of computers +including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It exists +because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations from +people in all walks of life. + +Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the +assistance they need, is critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's +goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will +remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project +Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure +and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future generations. +To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation +and how your efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4 +and the Foundation web page at http://www.pglaf.org. + + +Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive +Foundation + +The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non profit +501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the +state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal +Revenue Service. The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification +number is 64-6221541. Its 501(c)(3) letter is posted at +http://pglaf.org/fundraising. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg +Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent +permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state's laws. + +The Foundation's principal office is located at 4557 Melan Dr. S. +Fairbanks, AK, 99712., but its volunteers and employees are scattered +throughout numerous locations. Its business office is located at +809 North 1500 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887, email +business@pglaf.org. Email contact links and up to date contact +information can be found at the Foundation's web site and official +page at http://pglaf.org + +For additional contact information: + Dr. Gregory B. Newby + Chief Executive and Director + gbnewby@pglaf.org + +Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg +Literary Archive Foundation + +Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without wide +spread public support and donations to carry out its mission of +increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be +freely distributed in machine readable form accessible by the widest +array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations +($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt +status with the IRS. + +The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating +charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United +States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a +considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up +with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations +where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To +SEND DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any +particular state visit http://pglaf.org + +While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we +have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition +against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who +approach us with offers to donate. + +International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make +any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from +outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff. + +Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation +methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other +ways including checks, online payments and credit card +donations. To donate, please visit: http://pglaf.org/donate + + +Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works. + +Professor Michael S. Hart is the originator of the Project Gutenberg-tm +concept of a library of electronic works that could be freely shared +with anyone. For thirty years, he produced and distributed Project +Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer support. + +Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed +editions, all of which are confirmed as Public Domain in the U.S. +unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not necessarily +keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper edition. + +Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search facility: + + http://www.gutenberg.org + +This Web site includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm, +including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary +Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to +subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks. + +*** END: FULL LICENSE *** + + + +</pre> + +</body> +</html> + diff --git a/18218-h/images/001.png b/18218-h/images/001.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..aac8ab0 --- /dev/null +++ b/18218-h/images/001.png |
