summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/17370.txt
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to '17370.txt')
-rw-r--r--17370.txt1423
1 files changed, 1423 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/17370.txt b/17370.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..7971804
--- /dev/null
+++ b/17370.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,1423 @@
+The Project Gutenberg EBook of Prehistoric Textile Fabrics Of The United
+States, Derived From Impressions On Pottery, by William Henry Holmes
+
+This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with
+almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or
+re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included
+with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org
+
+
+Title: Prehistoric Textile Fabrics Of The United States, Derived From Impressions On Pottery
+ Third Annual Report of the Bureau of Ethnology to the
+ Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution, 1881-82,
+ Government Printing Office, Washington, 1884, pages 393-425
+
+Author: William Henry Holmes
+
+Release Date: December 22, 2005 [EBook #17370]
+
+Language: English
+
+Character set encoding: ASCII
+
+*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK PREHISTORIC TEXTILE FABRICS ***
+
+
+
+
+Produced by Louise Hope, Carlo Traverso,
+1st-hand-history.org, and the Online Distributed
+Proofreading Team at https://www.pgdp.net. This file was
+produced from images generously made available by the
+Bibliotheque nationale de France (BnF/Gallica) at
+http://gallica.bnf.fr.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+ SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION--BUREAU OF ETHNOLOGY.
+
+
+ PREHISTORIC TEXTILE FABRICS
+
+ OF THE
+
+ UNITED STATES,
+
+ DERIVED FROM IMPRESSIONS ON POTTERY.
+
+
+ by
+ WILLIAM H. HOLMES.
+
+ * * * * *
+ * * * *
+ * * * * *
+
+
+ CONTENTS.
+
+ Page.
+ Introductory 397
+ First Group 401
+ Second Group 404
+ Third Group 413
+ Fourth Group 416
+ Fifth Group 417
+ Sixth Group 418
+ Miscellaneous 420
+
+
+ ILLUSTRATIONS.
+
+[Transcriber's Note:
+In the original text, the position of illustrations was determined by
+available page space. For this e-text, each figure caption has been
+placed directly _after_ the paragraph describing the figure. Figure 88,
+which shared a caption with Figure 89, has been shifted down to join
+Figure 90. The captions are identical except for number.]
+
+Plate XXXIX.--Pottery, with impressions of textile fabrics 397
+
+Fig. 60.--Cord-marked vessel, Great Britain 399
+ 61.--Cord and fabric marked vessel, Pennsylvania 400
+ 62.--Combination of threads in coffee sacking 401
+ 63.--Section of same 401
+ 64.--Fabric from the ancient pottery of New York 402
+ 65.--Fabric from the ancient pottery of District of Columbia 402
+ 66.--Fabric from the ancient pottery of Arizona 402
+ 67.--Fabric from the caves of Kentucky 403
+ 68.--Fabric from the Swiss Lake Dwellings 403
+ 69.--Fabric from a mound in Ohio 403
+ 70.--Fabric from a mound in Ohio 403
+ 71.--Section of the same 403
+ 72.--Fabric from the ancient pottery of Tennessee 405
+ 73.--Section of same 405
+ 74.--Diagram showing method of weaving 405
+ 75.--Device for making the twist 406
+ 76.--Fabric from the ancient pottery of Tennessee 406
+ 77.--Fabric from the ancient pottery of Georgia 407
+ 78.--Fabric from the ancient pottery of Tennessee 407
+ 79.--Fabric from the ancient pottery of Tennessee 408
+ 80.--Fabric from the ancient pottery of Tennessee 408
+ 81.--Fabric from the ancient pottery of Arkansas 408
+ 82.--Fabric from the ancient pottery of Illinois 409
+ 83.--Fabric from the ancient pottery of Illinois 410
+ 84.--Fabric from the ancient pottery of Missouri 410
+ 85.--Fabric from the ancient pottery of Tennessee 410
+ 86.--Fabric from a copper celt, Iowa 411
+ 87.--Fabric from Vancouver's Island 412
+ 88.--Fabric from the Lake Dwellings of Switzerland 412
+ 89.--Fabric from the Lake Dwellings of Switzerland 412
+ 90.--Fabric from the Lake Dwellings of Switzerland 413
+ 91.--Section of third form of fabric 414
+ 92.--Device for weaving same 414
+ 93.--Fabric from the ancient pottery of Tennessee 414
+ 94.--Fabric from the ancient pottery of Tennessee 414
+ 95.--Fabric from the ancient pottery of Tennessee 414
+ 96.--Fabric from the ancient pottery of Tennessee 415
+ 97.--Fabric from the Northwest coast 415
+ 98.--Fabric from the ancient pottery of Tennessee 416
+ 99.--Fabric from the ancient pottery of Alabama 416
+ 100.--Fabric from the ancient pottery of Iowa 417
+ 101.--Plaiting of an ancient sandal 417
+ 102.--Braiding done by the Lake Dwellers 418
+ 103.--Fabric from the ancient pottery of District of Columbia 419
+ 104.--Fabric from the ancient pottery of North Carolina 419
+ 105.--Fabric from the ancient pottery of North Carolina 420
+ 106.--Net from the Lake Dwellings 420
+ 107.--Fabric from the ancient pottery of New Jersey 421
+ 108.--Fabric from the ancient pottery of New Jersey 421
+ 109.--Fabric from the ancient pottery of New Jersey 422
+ 110.--Fabric from the ancient pottery of Pennsylvania 422
+ 111.--Impression on the ancient pottery of Ohio 423
+ 112.--Impression on the ancient pottery of New Jersey 423
+ 113.--Impression on the ancient pottery of Alabama 423
+ 114.--Impression on the ancient pottery of Maryland 424
+ 115.--Impression on the ancient pottery of Alabama 425
+
+
+
+
+ [Illustration:
+ BUREAU OF ETHNOLOGY
+ ANNUAL REPORT 1882 PL. XXXIX
+
+ 1. POTSHERD. 2. CLAY CAST.
+ 3. POTSHERD. 4. CLAY CAST.
+ 5. POTSHERD. 6. CLAY CAST.
+
+ A. Hoen & Co. Litho[*illegible*], Baltimore.
+
+ POTTERY WITH IMPRESSIONS OF TEXTILE FABRICS.]
+
+
+
+
+PREHISTORIC TEXTILE FABRICS OF THE UNITED STATES,
+
+ DERIVED FROM IMPRESSIONS ON POTTERY.
+
+ By W. H. Holmes.
+
+
+ INTRODUCTORY.
+
+It is not my intention in this paper to make an exhaustive study of the
+art of weaving as practiced by the ancient peoples of this country. To
+do this would necessitate a very extended study of the materials used
+and of the methods of preparing them, as well as of the arts of spinning
+and weaving practiced by primitive peoples generally. This would be a
+very wide field, and one which I have no need of entering. I may state
+here, however, that the materials used by savages in weaving their
+simple fabrics consist generally of the fibre of bark, flax, hemp,
+nettles, and grasses, which is spun into thread of various sizes; or of
+splints of wood, twigs, roots, vines, porcupine quills, feathers, and a
+variety of animal tissues, either plaited or used in an untwisted state.
+The articles produced are mats, baskets, nets, bags, plain cloths, and
+entire garments, such as capes, hats, belts, and sandals.
+
+It has been noticed by a few authors that twisted or plaited cords,
+as well as a considerable variety of woven fabrics, have been used
+by primitive tribes in the manufacture and ornamentation of pottery.
+Impressions of these made in the soft clay are frequently preserved on
+very ancient ware, the original fabrics having long since crumbled to
+dust. It is to these that I propose calling attention, their restoration
+having been successfully accomplished in many hundreds of cases by
+taking impressions in clay from the ancient pottery.
+
+The perfect manner in which the fabric in all its details of plaiting,
+netting, and weaving can be brought out is a matter of astonishment; the
+cloth itself could hardly make all the particulars of its construction
+more manifest.
+
+The examples presented in the accompanying plate will be very
+instructive, as the fragment of pottery is given on the left, with its
+rather obscure intaglio impressions, and the clay cast on the right with
+the cords of the fabric in high relief. The great body of illustrations
+have been made in pen directly from the clay impressions, and, although
+details are more distinctly shown than in the specimens themselves,
+I believe that nothing is presented that cannot with ease be seen in the
+originals. Alongside of these restorations I have placed illustrations
+of fabrics from other primitive sources.
+
+There appears to be a pretty general impression that baskets of the
+ordinary rigid character have been extensively used by our ancient
+peoples in the manufacture of pottery to build the vessel in or upon;
+but my investigations tend to show that such is not the case, and
+that nets or sacks of pliable materials have been almost exclusively
+employed. These have been applied to the surface of the vessel,
+sometimes covering the exterior entirely, and at others only the body
+or a part of the body. The interior surface is sometimes partially
+decorated in the same manner.
+
+The nets or other fabrics used have generally been removed before the
+vessel was burned or even dried. Professor Wyman, in speaking casually
+of the cord-marked pottery of Tennessee, says:
+
+ "It seems incredible that even an Indian would be so prodigal of time
+ and labor as to make the necessary quantity of well-twisted cord or
+ thread, and weave it into shape for the mere purpose of serving as a
+ mold which must be destroyed in making a single copy."
+
+This remark is, however, based upon a false assumption. The fact that
+the net or fabric has generally been removed while the clay was still
+soft being susceptible of easy proof. I have observed in many cases
+that handles and ornaments have been added, and that impressed and
+incised designs have been made in the soft clay _after_ the removal
+of the woven fabric; besides this there would be no need of the support
+of a net after the vessel had been fully finished and slightly hardened.
+Furthermore, I have no doubt that these _textilia_ were employed as
+much for the purpose of enhancing the appearance of the vessel as for
+supporting it during the process of construction. I have observed, in
+relation to this point, that in a number of cases, notably the great
+salt vessels of Saline River, Illinois, the fabric has been applied
+after the vessel was finished. I arrive at this conclusion from having
+noticed that the loose threads of the net-like cover sag or festoon
+toward the rim as if applied to the inverted vessel, Fig. 82. If the net
+had been used to suspend the vessel while building, the threads would
+necessarily have hung in the opposite direction.
+
+In support of the idea that ornament was a leading consideration in the
+employment of these coarse fabrics, we have the well-known fact that
+simple cord-markings, arranged to form patterns, have been employed
+by many peoples for embellishment alone. This was a common practice
+of the ancient inhabitants of Great Britain, as shown by Jewett. The
+accompanying cut (Fig. 60) is copied from his work.[1]
+
+ [Illustration: Fig. 60.--Ancient British vase with cord
+ ornamentation.]
+
+ [Footnote 1: Jewett, Llewellynn: Grave mounds and their contents,
+ p. 92.]
+
+It is a remarkable fact that very few entire cord-marked vessels have
+been obtained in this country, although fragments of such are very
+plentiful.
+
+In Fig. 61 we have an ancient vase from Pennsylvania. It presents a
+combination of net or basket markings and of separate cord-markings.
+The regularity of the impressions upon the globular body indicates
+almost unbroken contact with the interior surface of the woven vessel.
+The neck and rim have apparently received finishing touches by
+separately impressing cords or narrow bands of some woven fabric.
+
+ [Illustration: Fig. 61.--Ancient fabric marked vessel, Pennsylvania.]
+
+Many examples show very irregular markings such as might have been made
+by rolling the plastic vessel irregularly upon a woven surface, or by
+molding it in an improvised sack made by tying up the margins of a piece
+of cloth.
+
+It is necessary to distinguish carefully the cord and fabric markings
+from the stamped designs so common in southern pottery, as well as
+from the incised designs, some of which imitate fabric markings very
+closely.
+
+I shall present at once a selection from the numerous examples of the
+fabrics restored. For convenience of study I have arranged them in six
+groups, some miscellaneous examples being added in a seventh group.
+For comparison, a number of illustrations of both ancient and modern
+textiles are presented.
+
+In regard to methods of manufacture but little need be said. The
+appliances used have been extremely simple, the work in a vast majority
+of cases having been done by hand. It is probable that in many instances
+a simple frame has been used, the threads of the web or warp being
+fixed at one end and those of the woof being carried through them by
+the fingers or by a simple needle or shuttle. A loom with a device for
+carrying the alternate threads of the warp back and forth may have been
+used, but that form of fabric in which the threads are twisted in pairs
+at each crossing of the woof could only have been made by hand.
+
+The probable methods will be dwelt upon more in detail as the groups
+are presented. In verifying the various methods of fabrication I have
+been greatly assisted by Miss Kate C. Osgood, who has successfully
+reproduced, in cotton cord, all the varieties discovered, all the
+mechanism necessary being a number of pins set in a drawing board or
+frame, in the form of three sides of a rectangle, the warp being fixed
+at one end only and the woof passing back and forth between the lateral
+rows of pins, as shown in Fig. 74.
+
+
+ FIRST GROUP.
+
+Fig. 62 illustrates a small fragment of an ordinary coffee sack which I
+take as a type of the first group. It is a loosely woven fabric of the
+simplest construction; the two sets of threads being interwoven at right
+angles to each other, alternate threads of one series passing over and
+under each of the opposing series as shown in the section, Fig. 63.
+
+ [Illustration: Fig. 62.--Type of Group one--portion of a coffee
+ sack.]
+
+ [Illustration: Fig. 63.--Section.]
+
+It is a remarkable fact that loosely woven examples of this kind of
+cloth are rarely, if ever, found among the impressions upon clay or in
+the fabrics themselves where preserved by the salts of copper or by
+charring. The reason of this probably is that the combination is such
+that when loosely woven the threads would not remain in place under
+tension, and the twisted and knotted varieties were consequently
+preferred.
+
+It is possible that many of the very irregular impressions observed, in
+which it is so difficult to trace the combinations of the threads, are
+of distorted fabrics of this class.
+
+This stuff may be woven by hand in a simple frame, or by any of the
+primitive forms of the loom.
+
+In most cases, so far as the impressions upon pottery show, when this
+particular combination is employed, the warp is generally very heavy and
+the woof comparatively light. This gives a cloth differing greatly from
+the type in appearance; and when, as is usually the case, the woof
+threads are beaten down tightly, obscuring those of the web, the
+resemblance to the type is quite lost.
+
+Examples of this kind of weaving may be obtained from the fictile
+remains of nearly all the Atlantic States.
+
+The specimen presented in Fig. 64 was obtained from a small fragment of
+ancient pottery from the State of New York.
+
+ [Illustration: Fig. 64.--Fabric impressed upon ancient pottery, New
+ York.]
+
+It is generally quite difficult to determine which set of threads is the
+warp and which the woof. In most cases I have preferred to call the more
+closely placed threads the woof, as they are readily beaten down by a
+baton, whereas it would be difficult to manipulate the warp threads if
+so closely placed. In the specimen illustrated, only the tightly woven
+threads of the woof appear. The impression is not sufficiently distinct
+to show the exact character of the thread, but there are indications
+that it has been twisted. The regularity and prominence of the ridges
+indicate a strong, tightly drawn warp.
+
+Fig. 65 represents a form of this type of fabric very common in
+impressions upon the pottery of the Middle Atlantic States. This
+specimen was obtained from a small potsherd picked up near Washington,
+D.C. The woof or cross-threads are small and uniform in thickness, and
+pass alternately over and under the somewhat rigid fillets of the web.
+The apparent rigidity of these fillets may result from the tightening
+of the series when the fabric was applied to the plastic surface of the
+vessel.
+
+ [Illustration: Fig. 65.--From a fragment of ancient pottery,
+ District of Columbia.]
+
+I present in Fig. 66 the only example of the impression of a woven
+fabric found by the writer in two summers' work among the remains of the
+ancient Cliff-Dwellers. It was obtained from the banks of the San Juan
+River, in southeastern Utah. It is probably the imprint of the interior
+surface of a more or less rigid basket, such as are to be seen among
+many of the modern tribes of the Southwest. The character of the warp
+cannot be determined, as the woof, which has been of moderately heavy
+rushes or other untwisted, vegetable fillets, entirely hides it.
+
+ [Illustration: Fig. 66.--From a fragment of ancient Cliff-house
+ pottery.]
+
+The caves of Kentucky have furnished specimens of ancient weaving of
+much interest. One of these, a small fragment of a mat apparently made
+from the fiber of bark, or a fibrous rush, is illustrated in Fig. 67.
+
+ [Illustration: Fig. 67.--Fabric from a cave in Kentucky.]
+
+This simple combination of the web and woof has been employed by all
+ancient weavers who have left us examples of their work. The specimen
+given in Fig. 68 is the work of the ancient Lake-Dwellers of
+Switzerland. It is a mat plaited or woven of strips of bast, and was
+found at Robenhausen, having been preserved in a charred state.[2]
+Keller gives another example of a similar fabric of much finer texture
+in Fig. 8, Pl. CXXXVI.
+
+ [Illustration: Fig. 68.--Fabric from Swiss Lake-Dwellings.]
+
+ [Footnote 2: Keller: Lake-Dwellers. Fig. 2, Pl. CXXXIV.]
+
+An illustration of this form of fabric is given by Foster,[3] and
+reproduced in Fig. 69.
+
+ [Illustration: Fig. 69.--Cloth from a mound, Ohio.]
+
+ [Footnote 3: Foster: Prehistoric Times.]
+
+In the same place this author presents another form of cloth shown in my
+Fig. 70. In Fig. 71 we have a section of this fabric. These cloths, with
+a number of other specimens, were taken from a mound on the west side of
+the Great Miama River, Butler County, Ohio. The fabric in both samples
+appears to be composed of some material allied to hemp. As his remarks
+on these specimens, as well as on the general subject, are quite
+interesting, I quote them somewhat at length.
+
+ "The separation between the fibre and the wood appears to have been
+ as thorough and effectual as at this day by the process of rotting and
+ hackling. The thread, though coarse, is uniform in size, and regularly
+ spun. Two modes of weaving are recognized: In one, by the alternate
+ intersection of the warp and woof, and in the other, the weft is wound
+ once around the warp, a process which could not be accomplished except
+ by hand. In the illustration the interstices have been enlarged to
+ show the method of weaving, but in the original the texture was about
+ the same as that in coarse sail-cloth. In some of the Butler County
+ specimens there is evidently a fringed border."
+
+ [Illustration: Fig. 70.--Cloth from a mound, Ohio.]
+
+ [Illustration: Fig. 71.--Section.]
+
+In regard to the second specimen described, I would remark that it is a
+very unusual form, no such combination of the parts having come to my
+notice either in the ancient fabrics themselves or in the impressions on
+pottery. In a very closely woven cloth it might be possible to employ
+such a combination, each thread of the web being turned once around each
+thread of the woof as shown in Fig. 71; but certainly it would work in
+a very unsatisfactory manner in open fabrics. I would suggest that this
+example may possibly belong to my second group, which, upon the surface,
+would have a similar appearance. The combination of this form is shown
+in the section, Fig. 73.
+
+
+ SECOND GROUP.
+
+It is not impossible, as previously stated, that open fabrics of the
+plain type were avoided for the reason that the threads would not remain
+in place if subjected to tension. A very ingenious method of fixing the
+threads of open work, without resorting to the device of knotting has
+been extensively employed in the manufacture of ancient textiles. The
+simplest form of cloth in which this combination is used is shown in
+Fig. 72. This example, which was obtained from a small fragment of
+pottery found in Polk County, Tennessee, may be taken as a type.
+
+ [Illustration: Fig. 72.--From ancient pottery, Tennessee.]
+
+ [Illustration: Fig. 73.--Section.]
+
+Two series of threads are interwoven at right angles, the warp series
+being arranged in pairs and the woof singly. At each intersection the
+pairs of warp threads are twisted half around upon themselves, inclosing
+the woof threads and holding them quite firmly, so that the open mesh
+is well preserved even when much strained. Fabrics of this character
+have been employed by the ancient potters of a very extended region,
+including nearly all the Atlantic States. There are also many varieties
+of this form, of fabric resulting from differences in the size and
+spacing of the threads. These differences are well brought out in the
+series of illustrations that follow.
+
+In regard to the manufacture of this particular fabric, I am unable to
+arrive at any very definite conclusion. As demonstrated by Miss Osgood,
+it may be knitted by hand, the threads of the warp being fixed at one
+end and the woof at both by wrapping about pegs set in a drawing board
+or frame, as shown in the diagram, Fig. 74.
+
+ [Illustration: Fig. 74.--Diagram showing the method of weaving
+ Form 2.]
+
+The combination is extremely difficult to produce by mechanical means,
+and must have been beyond the reach of any primitive loom. I have
+prepared a diagram, Fig. 75, which, shows very clearly the arrangement
+of threads, and illustrates a possible method of supporting the warp
+while the woof is carried across. As each thread of the woof is laid in
+place, the threads of the warp can be thrown to the opposite support,
+a turn or half twist being made at each exchange. The work could be done
+equally well by beginning at the top and working downward. For the sake
+of clearness I have drawn but one pair of the warp threads.
+
+ [Illustration: Fig. 75.--Theoretic device for working the twist.]
+
+Fig. 76 illustrates a characteristic example of this class obtained from
+a fragment of pottery from the great mound at Sevierville, Tenn.
+
+ [Illustration: Fig. 76.--From fragment of mound pottery, Tennessee.]
+
+The impression is quite perfect. The cords are somewhat uneven, and seem
+to have been only moderately well twisted. They were probably made of
+some vegetable fiber. It will be observed that the threads of the woof
+are placed at regular intervals, while those of the web are irregularly
+placed. It is interesting to notice that in one case the warp has not
+been doubled, the single thread having, as a consequence, exactly the
+same relation to the opposing series as corresponding threads in the
+first form of fabric presented. The impression, of which this is only a
+part, indicates that the cloth was considerably distorted when applied
+to the soft clay. The slipping of one of the woof threads is well shown
+in the upper part of the figure.
+
+The fabric shown in Fig. 77 has been impressed upon an earthen vessel
+from Macon, Ga. It has been very well and neatly formed, and all the
+details of fiber, twist, and combination can be made out.
+
+ [Illustration: Fig. 77.--From ancient pottery, Georgia.]
+
+The example given in Fig. 78 differs from the preceding in the spacing
+and pairing of the warp cords. It was obtained from a fragment of
+ancient pottery recently collected at Reel Foot Lake, Tennessee.
+
+ [Illustration: Fig. 78.--From ancient pottery, Tennessee.]
+
+Fig. 79 represents another interesting specimen from the pottery of the
+same locality. The border is woven somewhat differently from the body of
+the fabric, two threads of the woof being included in each loop of the
+warp.
+
+ [Illustration: Fig. 79.--From ancient pottery, Tennessee.]
+
+Fig. 80 is from the pottery of the same locality. The threads are much
+more closely woven than those already given.
+
+ [Illustration: Fig. 80.--From ancient pottery, Tennessee.]
+
+The next example, Fig. 81, impressed upon a fragment of clay from
+Arkansas, has been made of coarse, well-twisted cords. An ornamental
+border has been produced by looping the cords of the woof, which seem
+to have been five in number, each one passing over four others before
+recrossing the warp.
+
+ [Illustration: Fig. 81.--From a piece of clay, Arkansas.]
+
+In no locality are so many fine impressions of textiles upon clay
+vessels found as in the ancient salt-making districts of the Mississippi
+Valley. The huge bowl or tub-like vessels used by the primitive
+salt-makers have very generally been modeled in coarse nets, or
+otherwise have had many varieties of netting impressed upon them for
+ornament.
+
+In the accompanying plate (XXXIX) two fine examples of these impressions
+are given. They are somewhat more clearly defined than the majority of
+those from which the other illustrations are made.
+
+Fig. 82 illustrates a specimen in which every detail is perfectly
+preserved. Only a small portion of the original is shown in the cut. The
+cords are heavy and well twisted, but the spacing is somewhat irregular.
+I observe one interesting fact in regard to this impression. The fabric
+has apparently been applied to the inverted vessel, as the loose cords
+of the woof which run parallel with the rim droop or hang in festoons
+between the cords of the warp as shown in the illustration, which is
+here placed, as drawn from the inverted fragment. The inference to be
+drawn from this fact is that the fabric was applied to the exterior of
+the vessel, after it was completed and inverted, for the purpose of
+enhancing its beauty. When we recollect, however, that these vessels
+were probably built for service only, with thick walls and rude finish,
+we are at a loss to see why so much pains should have been taken in
+their embellishment. It seems highly probable that, generally, the
+inspiring idea was one of utility, and that the fabric served in some
+way as a support to the pliable clay, or that the network of shallow
+impressions was supposed to act after the manner of a _degraissant_
+to neutralize the tendency to fracture.
+
+ [Illustration: Fig. 82.--From fragment of a large salt vessel,
+ Saline River, Illinois.]
+
+Another example from the same locality is shown in Fig. 83. This is
+similar to that shown in the lower figure of Plate XXXIX. It is very
+neatly woven of evenly spun and well-twisted thread. The double series
+is widely spaced as shown in the drawing.
+
+ [Illustration: Fig. 83.--From a salt vessel, Saline River, Illinois.]
+
+The very interesting specimen illustrated in Fig. 84 was obtained from
+a small fragment of pottery found in Fort Ripley County, Missouri. The
+combination of the two series of threads or strands clearly indicates
+the type of fabric under consideration, the twisted cords of the warp
+being placed very far apart. The remarkable feature of this example is
+the character of the woof, which seems to be a broad braid formed by
+plaiting three strands of untwisted fiber, probably bast. All the
+details are shown in the most satisfactory manner in the clay cast.
+
+ [Illustration: Fig. 84.--From ancient pottery, Missouri.]
+
+The open character of the web in this specimen assists very much, in
+explaining the structure of tightly-woven examples such as that shown in
+Fig. 85, in which the cross cords are so closely placed that the broad
+bands of the opposing series are completely hidden.
+
+ [Illustration: Fig. 85.--From ancient pottery, Tennessee.]
+
+I have made the drawing to show fillets of fiber appearing at the ends.
+These do not appear in the impression. It is highly probable, however,
+that these fillets are plaited bands, as in the preceding example. They
+are wide and flat, giving somewhat the effect of basket-work of splints
+or of rushes. This specimen was obtained in Carter County, Tennessee.
+
+We have a few pieces of this variety of fabric which have been preserved
+by contact with the salts of copper. Professor Farquharson describes
+an example from a mound on the banks of the Mississippi River, near
+the city of Davenport. It had been wrapped about a copper implement
+resembling a celt, and was at the time of its recovery in a very perfect
+state of preservation. In describing this cloth Mr. Farquharson says
+that
+ "the warp is composed of four cords, that is, of _two double and
+ twisted_ cords, and the woof of _one_ such doubled and twisted cord
+ which passes between the two parts of the warp; the latter being
+ twisted at each change, allowing the cords to be brought close
+ together so as to cover the woof almost entirely."
+His illustration is somewhat erroneous, the artist not having had quite
+a clear understanding of the combination of threads. This cloth has a
+general resemblance to ordinary coffee-sacking. In Fig. 86 I give an
+illustration of this fabric derived from the opposite side of the celt.
+
+ [Illustration: Fig. 86.--Fabric from a copper celt, Iowa.]
+
+Although I am not quite positive, it is my opinion, after having
+examined the specimen carefully, that the body of the cloth belongs
+to my first group and that the border only is of the second group.
+My section and drawing give a clear idea of the construction of this
+fabric. A finely-preserved bit of cloth belonging to the group under
+consideration was recently found fixed to the surface of a copper image
+from one of the Etowah mounds in Georgia.
+
+This form of weaving is very common among the productions of the modern
+tribes of Western America. A very good example is shown in Fig. 87,
+which represents the border of a cape like garment made by the Clyoquot
+Indians, of Vancouver's Island. It is woven, apparently, of the fiber of
+bark, both web and woof showing considerable diversity in the size of
+the cords. The border has been strengthened by sewing in a broad, thin
+fillet of rawhide.
+
+ [Illustration: Fig. 87.--Modern work, Vancouver's Island.]
+
+The beautiful mats of the northwest coast peoples, from California to
+Ounalaska, are often woven in this manner, the materials being bast,
+grass, or rushes.
+
+The Lake Dwellers of Switzerland seem to have made a great many
+varieties of cloth of this type. I have reproduced four examples from
+the great work of Dr. Keller. Fig. 88 is copied from his Fig. 1, Plate
+CXXXV. It exhibits some variations from the type, double strips of bast
+being bound by a woof consisting of alternate strips of bast and cords.
+It is from Robenhausen.
+
+ [Illustration: Fig. 88.--Fabric from the Lake Dwellings,
+ Switzerland.]
+
+In Figs. 89 and 90 we have typical examples from the same locality. The
+woof series seems to consist of untwisted strands of bast or flax.
+
+ [Illustration: Figs. 89 and 90.--Fabrics from the Lake Dwellings,
+ Switzerland.]
+
+
+ THIRD GROUP.
+
+A third form of fabric is distinguished from the last by marked
+peculiarities in the combinations of the threads. The threads of the
+warp are arranged in pairs as in the last form described, but are
+twisted in such a way as to inclose two of the opposing series instead
+of one, each succeeding pair of warp threads taking up alternate pairs
+of the woof threads, as shown in the section, Fig. 91. This is a very
+interesting variety, and apparently one that would possess coherence and
+elasticity of a very high order.
+
+ [Illustration: Fig. 91.--Section.]
+
+In Fig. 92 a simple scheme of plaiting or weaving this material is
+suggested. It will be seen to differ from the last chiefly in the way
+in which the woof is taken up by the warp.
+
+ [Illustration: Fig. 92.--Theoretical device for weaving third group.]
+
+The ancient pottery of the Mississippi Valley furnishes many examples of
+this fabric. It is made of twisted cords and threads of sizes similar to
+those of the other work described, varying from the weight of ordinary
+spool cotton to that of heavy twine. The mesh is generally quite open.
+
+In Fig. 93 we have a very well preserved example from Reelfoot Lake,
+Tennessee. It was obtained from a large fragment of coarse pottery.
+Other pieces are nearly twice as coarse, while some are much finer.
+
+ [Illustration: Fig. 93.--From the ancient pottery of Tennessee.]
+
+Figs. 94 and 95 are finer specimens from the same locality.
+
+ [Illustration: Fig. 94. Fig. 95.
+ From the ancient pottery of Tennessee.]
+
+We have also good examples from Saline River, Illinois. They are
+obtained from fragments of the gigantic salt vessels so plentiful
+in that locality.
+
+The upper figure of Plate XXXIX illustrates one of these specimens.
+Other examples hare been obtained from Roane County, Tennessee.
+
+A piece of charred cloth from a mound in Butler County, Ohio, has been
+woven in this manner. Foster has described examples of the two preceding
+forms from the same locality. The material used is a vegetable fiber
+obtained from the bark of trees or from some fibrous weed. This specimen
+is now in the National Museum.
+
+An interesting variety of this form is given in Fig. 96. It is from a
+small piece of pottery exhumed from a mound on Fain's Island, Jefferson
+County, Tennessee. The threads of the woof are quite close together,
+those of the web far apart.
+
+ [Illustration: Fig. 96.--From ancient pottery, Tennessee.]
+
+A very fine example of this variety of fabric was obtained by Dr. Tarrow
+from an ancient cemetery near Dos Pueblos, Cal. It is illustrated in
+Fig. 2, Plate XIV, vol. VII, of Surveys West of the 100th Meridian.[4]
+In describing it, Professor Putnam says that the fiber is probably
+obtained from a species of _yucca_. He says that
+ "the woof is made of two strands, crossing the warp in such a manner
+ that the strands alternate in passing, over and under it, and at the
+ same time inclosing two alternate strands, of the latter, making a
+ letter X figure of the warp, united at the center of the X by the
+ double strands of the woof."
+It should be noticed that the series of cords called the woof by
+Professor Putnam are designated as warp in my own descriptions. The
+illustration shows a fabric identical with that given in the upper
+figure of Plate XXXIX, and the description quoted describes perfectly
+the type of fabric under consideration.
+
+ [Footnote 4: Putnam, F. W., in Vol. VII of Surveys West of the
+ 100th Meridian, page 244.]
+
+This method of weaving is still practiced by some of the western tribes,
+as may be seen by a visit to the national collection.
+
+A somewhat complicated arrangement of the threads may be seen in
+the fabric shown in Fig. 97. It is clearly only a variation of the
+combination just described. The manner in which the threads pass over,
+under, and across each other can be more easily understood by reference
+to the figure than by any description. It comes from one of the
+Northwest coast tribes.
+
+ [Illustration: Fig. 97.--Modern fabric, Northwest coast.]
+
+
+ FOURTH GROUP.
+
+A fourth form of fabric, illustrated in Fig. 98, is of very rare
+occurrence on our fictile remains.
+
+ [Illustration: Fig. 98.--Diagonal fabric, ancient pottery of
+ Tennessee.]
+
+It is a very neatly woven diagonal from the ancient pottery of Polk
+County, Tennessee. Two series of cords have been interwoven at right
+angles to each other, but so arranged as to produce a diagonal pattern.
+One series of the cords is fine and well twisted, the other coarser and
+very slightly twisted.
+
+The remarkable sample of matting shown in Fig. 99 is from a small piece
+of pottery from Alabama. It has been worked in the diagonal style, but
+is somewhat different from the last example. It has probably been made
+of rushes or heavy blades of grass.
+
+ [Illustration: Fig. 99.--From the ancient pottery of Alabama.]
+
+The texture shown in Fig. 100 is from a rather indistinct impression
+upon a small fragment of pottery from Iowa. One series of the strands
+seems to have been quite rigid, while the other has been pliable, and
+appear in the impression only where they have crossed the rigid series.
+The dotted lines indicate their probable course on the under side of the
+cross threads.
+
+ [Illustration: Fig. 100.--From ancient pottery, Iowa.]
+
+This form of fabric is very common in modern work.
+
+
+ FIFTH GROUP.
+
+In Fig. 101 I present a variety of ancient fabric which has not to my
+knowledge been found upon ceramic products. This specimen shows the
+method of plaiting sandals practiced by the ancient inhabitants of
+Kentucky. Numbers of these very interesting relics have been obtained
+from the great caves of that State. They are beautifully woven, and well
+shaped to the foot.
+
+ [Illustration: Fig. 101.--Plaiting of a sandal, Kentucky cave.]
+
+The fiber has the appearance of bast and is plaited in untwisted
+strands, after the manner shown in the illustration. Professor Putman
+describes a number of cast-off sandals from Salt Cave, Kentucky, as
+"neatly made of finely braided and twisted leaves of rushes."[5]
+
+ [Footnote 5: Putnam, F. W. Eighth Annual Report of the Peabody
+ Museum, p. 49.]
+
+Fig. 102 illustrates a somewhat similar method of plaiting practiced by
+the Lake Dwellers of Switzerland, from one of Keller's figures.[6]
+
+ [Illustration: Fig. 102.--Braiding done by the Lake-Dwellers.]
+
+ [Footnote 6: Keller, Dr. F. Lake Dwellers. Fig. 3; Pl. CXXXVI.]
+
+
+ SIXTH GROUP.
+
+The art of making nets of spun and twisted cords seems to have been
+practiced by many of the ancient peoples of America. Beautiful examples
+have been found in the _huacas_ of the Incas and in the tombs of the
+Aztecs. They were used by the prehistoric tribes of California and the
+ancient inhabitants of Alaska. Nets were in use by the Indians of
+Florida and Virginia at the time of the discovery, and the ancient
+pottery of the Atlantic States has preserved impressions of a number
+of varieties. It is possible that some of these impressions may be from
+European nets, but we have plentiful historical proof that nets of hemp
+were in use by the natives, and as all of this pottery is very old it is
+probable that the impressions upon the fragments are from nets of native
+manufacture.
+
+Wyman states that nets or net impressions have not been found among the
+antiquities of Tennessee. I have found, however, that the pottery of
+Carolina, Virginia, and Maryland furnish examples of netting in great
+numbers. In many cases the meshes have been distorted by stretching and
+overlapping so that the fabric cannot be examined in detail; in other
+cases the impressions have been so deep that casts cannot be taken, and
+in a majority of cases the fragments are so decayed that no details of
+the cords and their combinations can be made out.
+
+In Fig. 103 we have a thoroughly satisfactory restoration from a small
+fragment of pottery picked up in the District of Columbia. It is shown
+a little larger than natural size in the drawing. The impression is so
+perfect that the twist of the cord and the form of the knot may be seen
+with ease. Most of the examples from this locality are of much finer
+cord and have a less open mesh than the specimen illustrated. It is
+a noteworthy fact that in one of these specimens an incised pattern
+has been added to the surface of the soft clay after the removal
+of the net.
+
+Recent collections from the mounds of Western North Carolina have
+brought to light many examples of net-marked pottery. Generally the
+impressions are quite obscure, but enough can be seen in the cast to
+show clearly the character of the fabric. The restoration given in
+Fig. 104 represents an average mesh, others being finer and others
+coarser. Another specimen from the same collection is shown in Fig. 105.
+The impression is not very distinct, bat there is an apparent doubling
+of the cords, indicating a very unusual combination. It is possible that
+this may have come from the imperfect imprinting, but I can detect no
+indications of a shifting of the net upon the soft clay.
+
+ [Illustration: Fig. 103.--From ancient pottery, District of
+ Columbia.]
+
+ [Illustration: Fig. 104.--Net from the pottery of North Carolina.]
+
+ [Illustration: Fig. 105.--Net from the pottery of North Carolina.]
+
+Many interesting examples could be given, both from the ancient and
+modern work of the inhabitants of the Pacific coast, but for the present
+I shall content myself by presenting a single example from the Lake
+Dwellings of Switzerland (Fig. 106):
+
+ [Illustration: Fig. 106.--Net from the Swiss Lake Dwellings. Keller,
+ plate, CXXX.]
+
+
+ MISCELLANEOUS FORMS.
+
+The forms of fabrics used by the ancient tribes of the Middle and
+Northern Atlantic States in the manufacture and ornamentation of their
+pottery have differed materially from those used in the South and West.
+As a rule the fragments are smaller and the impressions less perfectly
+preserved. The fabrics have been more complicated and less carefully
+applied to the vessel. In many cases the impressions seem to have
+been made from disconnected bands, belts, or strips of cloth. Single
+cords, or cords arranged in groups by rolling on sticks, or by other
+contrivances, have been extensively employed. Baskets have doubtless
+been used, some of which have been woven, but others have apparently
+been of bark or skin, with stitched designs of thread or quills. Some
+of the impressions suggest the use of woven vessels or fabrics filled
+up with clay or resin, so that the prominences only are imprinted, or
+otherwise cloths may have been used in which raised figures were worked.
+
+Fig. 107 is obtained from a fragment of pottery from New Jersey. The
+impressions are extremely puzzling, but are such as I imagine might be
+made by the use of a basket, the meshes of which had been filled up with
+clay or resin so that only the more prominent ridges or series of thongs
+remain uncovered to give impressions upon the clay. But the threads or
+thongs indicate a pliable net rather than a basket, and the appearance
+of the horizontal threads at the ends of the series of raised stitches
+suggests that possibly the material may have been bark or smooth cloth
+with a heavy pattern stitched into it.
+
+ [Illustration: Fig. 107.--From the ancient pottery of New Jersey.]
+
+Very similar to the above is the example given in Fig. 108, also derived
+from the pottery of New Jersey.
+
+ [Illustration: Fig. 108.--From the ancient pottery of New Jersey.]
+
+Fig. 109 illustrates an impression upon another fragment from the same
+state. This impression may have been made by a piece of birch bark or
+fine fabric with a pattern sewed into it with cords or quills.
+
+ [Illustration: Fig. 109.--From the ancient pottery of New Jersey.]
+
+Fig. 110 illustrates an impression upon a large, well-made vase, with
+scalloped rim, from Easton, Pa. The character of the fabric is difficult
+to make out, the impression suggesting bead-work. That it is from a
+fabric, however, is evident from the fact that there is system and
+uniformity in the arrangement of markings, the indentations alternating
+as in the impressions of fabrics of the simplest type. Yet there is
+an appearance of patchwork in the impression that suggests separate
+applications of the material.
+
+ [Illustration: Fig. 110.--From the ancient pottery of Pennsylvania.]
+
+In Figs. 111 and 112 we have what appear to be impressions of bands or
+belts. The first shown consists of six parallel cords, coarse and well
+twisted, with a border of short cord indentations placed at regular
+intervals. This is a very usual form in all parts of the country, from
+the Mandan towns of the Missouri to Florida. It is possible that the
+cords may in this case have been separately impressed, but the example
+given in Fig. 112 is undoubtedly from, a woven band or belt, the middle
+portion of which seems to have been a closely-woven cloth, with a sort
+of pattern produced by series of raised or knotted threads. The borders
+consist of single longitudinal cord impressions with an edging of short
+cord indentations placed at right angles to the belt.
+
+ [Illustration: Fig. 111.--From the ancient pottery of Ohio.]
+
+ [Illustration: Fig. 112.--From the ancient pottery of New Jersey.]
+
+Similar to the last is the very effective decorative design impressed
+upon a large fragment of pottery from Alabama, shown in Fig. 113. The
+peculiarity of this example is the use of plaited instead of twisted
+cords. The work is neatly done and very effective. It seems to me almost
+certain that single cords have been used. They have been so imprinted
+as to form a zone, filled with groups of lines placed at various angles.
+An ornamental border of short lines has been added, as in the examples
+previously given.
+
+ [Illustration: Fig. 113.--From the ancient pottery of Alabama.]
+
+Two other examples of cord ornamentation, which may be duplicated from
+the pottery of almost any of the Atlantic States, are presented in Figs.
+114 and 115, the first from a fragment of pottery from Charles County,
+Maryland, and the other from the pottery of Alabama.
+
+ [Illustration: Fig. 114.--Cord-markings from ancient pottery of
+ Maryland.]
+
+ [Illustration: Fig. 115.--Cord-markings from ancient pottery of
+ Alabama.]
+
+It will readily be seen that it is extremely difficult to draw a line
+between an ornamentation produced by the use of single or grouped cords
+and that made by the use of fabrics.
+
+It is not less difficult to say just how much of this use of cords
+and fabrics is to be attributed to manufacture simply and how much to
+ornament.
+
+Although the restorations here presented certainly throw considerable
+light upon the textile fabrics of the ancient inhabitants of the
+Atlantic States, it cannot be affirmed that anything like a complete
+idea of their fabrics has been gained. Impressions upon pottery
+represent a class of work utilized in the fictile arts. We cannot
+say what other fabrics were produced and used for other purposes.
+
+However this may be, attention should be called to the fact that the
+work described, though varied and ingenious, exhibits no characters in
+execution or design not wholly consonant with the art of a stone-age
+people. There is nothing superior to or specifically different from the
+work of our modern Indians.
+
+The origin of the use of fabrics and of separate cords in the
+ornamentation of pottery is very obscure. Baskets and nets were
+doubtless in use by many tribes throughout their pottery making period.
+The shaping of earthen vessels in or upon baskets either of plain bark
+or of woven splints or of fiber must frequently have occurred. The
+peculiar impressions left upon the clay probably came in time to be
+regarded as ornamental, and were applied for purposes of embellishment
+alone. Decorative art has thus been enriched by many elements of beauty.
+These now survive in incised, stamped, and painted designs. The forms as
+well as the ornamentation of clay vessels very naturally preserve traces
+of the former intimacy of the two arts.
+
+
+Since the stereotyping of these pages I have come upon a short paper by
+George E. Sellers (Popular Science Monthly, Vol. XI, p. 573), in which
+is given what I believe to be a correct view of the use of nets in the
+manufacture of the large salt vessels referred to on pages 398 and 409.
+The use of interior conical moulds of indurated clay makes clear the
+reasons for the reversed festooning of the cords to which I called
+attention.
+
+
+ INDEX
+
+Cord-markings on pottery 423
+
+Diagonal textiles 416
+
+Fabrics, Diagonal 417
+ Forms of 401
+ from New Jersey 421
+ " Iowa 411
+ " Mississippi Valley 408-411
+ " Southern States 407
+ of lake dwellers 413
+ Miscellaneous 415
+Farquharson, Prof., describes fabric from Iowa 411
+
+Holmes, W. H., Catalogue of Ethnological collections 393
+
+Jewett, L., British vase from the work of 399
+
+Keller, Dr. F.,
+ on fabrics of Swiss lake dwellers 404, 412, 413, 418, 420
+
+Lake dwellings, Fabrics from Swiss 403, 412, 413, 418, 420
+
+Mississippi Valley, Prehistoric fabrics from 408-411
+
+Nets from Atlantic coast 419
+
+Osgood, Miss Kate C., reproduced methods of fabrication 400, 406
+
+Putnam, F. W., on ancient fabrics 415, 418
+
+Swiss lake dwellings, Fabrics from 403, 412, 413, 418, 420
+
+Textiles, Diagonal 417
+ Forms of 401
+ from Mississippi Valley, Prehistoric 408-411
+ " New Jersey, Prehistoric 421
+ " Southern States, Prehistoric 407
+ " Swiss Lake dwellers, Prehistoric 413
+ Miscellaneous 415
+ used to support pottery 398
+
+Vase from the work of Llewellyn Jewett, British 399
+
+Weaving illustrated from pottery, Materials used in 397
+ Modes of 401, 405, 413
+Wyman, Prof., on cord-marked pottery of Tennessee 398
+
+Yarrow, Dr., H. C., obtained fabrics from pottery in California 415
+
+
+
+
+
+End of the Project Gutenberg EBook of
+
+*** END OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK PREHISTORIC TEXTILE FABRICS ***
+
+***** This file should be named 17370.txt or 17370.zip *****
+This and all associated files of various formats will be found in:
+ https://www.gutenberg.org/1/7/3/7/17370/
+
+Produced by Louise Hope, Carlo Traverso,
+1st-hand-history.org, and the Online Distributed
+Proofreading Team at https://www.pgdp.net. This file was
+produced from images generously made available by the
+Bibliotheque nationale de France (BnF/Gallica) at
+http://gallica.bnf.fr.
+
+
+Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions
+will be renamed.
+
+Creating the works from public domain print editions means that no
+one owns a United States copyright in these works, so the Foundation
+(and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United States without
+permission and without paying copyright royalties. Special rules,
+set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license, apply to
+copying and distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works to
+protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm concept and trademark. Project
+Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if you
+charge for the eBooks, unless you receive specific permission. If you
+do not charge anything for copies of this eBook, complying with the
+rules is very easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose
+such as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and
+research. They may be modified and printed and given away--you may do
+practically ANYTHING with public domain eBooks. Redistribution is
+subject to the trademark license, especially commercial
+redistribution.
+
+
+
+*** START: FULL LICENSE ***
+
+THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE
+PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK
+
+To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free
+distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work
+(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project
+Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full Project
+Gutenberg-tm License (available with this file or online at
+https://gutenberg.org/license).
+
+
+Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic works
+
+1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to
+and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property
+(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all
+the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or destroy
+all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your possession.
+If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the
+terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or
+entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8.
+
+1.B. "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark. It may only be
+used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who
+agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few
+things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works
+even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See
+paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement
+and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
+works. See paragraph 1.E below.
+
+1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the Foundation"
+or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection of Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic works. Nearly all the individual works in the
+collection are in the public domain in the United States. If an
+individual work is in the public domain in the United States and you are
+located in the United States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from
+copying, distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative
+works based on the work as long as all references to Project Gutenberg
+are removed. Of course, we hope that you will support the Project
+Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting free access to electronic works by
+freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm works in compliance with the terms of
+this agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with
+the work. You can easily comply with the terms of this agreement by
+keeping this work in the same format with its attached full Project
+Gutenberg-tm License when you share it without charge with others.
+
+1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern
+what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are in
+a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States, check
+the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this agreement
+before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, distributing or
+creating derivative works based on this work or any other Project
+Gutenberg-tm work. The Foundation makes no representations concerning
+the copyright status of any work in any country outside the United
+States.
+
+1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg:
+
+1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate
+access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear prominently
+whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work on which the
+phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the phrase "Project
+Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed, viewed,
+copied or distributed:
+
+This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with
+almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or
+re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included
+with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org
+
+1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is derived
+from the public domain (does not contain a notice indicating that it is
+posted with permission of the copyright holder), the work can be copied
+and distributed to anyone in the United States without paying any fees
+or charges. If you are redistributing or providing access to a work
+with the phrase "Project Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the
+work, you must comply either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1
+through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the
+Project Gutenberg-tm trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or
+1.E.9.
+
+1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted
+with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution
+must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any additional
+terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms will be linked
+to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works posted with the
+permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of this work.
+
+1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this
+work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm.
+
+1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this
+electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without
+prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with
+active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project
+Gutenberg-tm License.
+
+1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary,
+compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including any
+word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access to or
+distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format other than
+"Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official version
+posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm web site (www.gutenberg.org),
+you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a
+copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon
+request, of the work in its original "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other
+form. Any alternate format must include the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1.
+
+1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying,
+performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works
+unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.
+
+1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing
+access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works provided
+that
+
+- You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from
+ the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method
+ you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is
+ owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he
+ has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the
+ Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments
+ must be paid within 60 days following each date on which you
+ prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your periodic tax
+ returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked as such and
+ sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the
+ address specified in Section 4, "Information about donations to
+ the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation."
+
+- You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies
+ you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he
+ does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+ License. You must require such a user to return or
+ destroy all copies of the works possessed in a physical medium
+ and discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of
+ Project Gutenberg-tm works.
+
+- You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any
+ money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the
+ electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days
+ of receipt of the work.
+
+- You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
+ distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works.
+
+1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set
+forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from
+both the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and Michael
+Hart, the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark. Contact the
+Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below.
+
+1.F.
+
+1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable
+effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread
+public domain works in creating the Project Gutenberg-tm
+collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
+works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may contain
+"Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or
+corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual
+property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other medium, a
+computer virus, or computer codes that damage or cannot be read by
+your equipment.
+
+1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right
+of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project
+Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project
+Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all
+liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal
+fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT
+LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE
+PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH F3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE
+TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE
+LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR
+INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH
+DAMAGE.
+
+1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a
+defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can
+receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a
+written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you
+received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium with
+your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you with
+the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu of a
+refund. If you received the work electronically, the person or entity
+providing it to you may choose to give you a second opportunity to
+receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If the second copy
+is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing without further
+opportunities to fix the problem.
+
+1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth
+in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS' WITH NO OTHER
+WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO
+WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTIBILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.
+
+1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied
+warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages.
+If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the
+law of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be
+interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by
+the applicable state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any
+provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions.
+
+1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the
+trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone
+providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in accordance
+with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the production,
+promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works,
+harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees,
+that arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do
+or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg-tm
+work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or deletions to any
+Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any Defect you cause.
+
+
+Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of
+electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of computers
+including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It exists
+because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations from
+people in all walks of life.
+
+Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the
+assistance they need, is critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's
+goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will
+remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project
+Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure
+and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future generations.
+To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation
+and how your efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4
+and the Foundation web page at https://www.pglaf.org.
+
+
+Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
+Foundation
+
+The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non profit
+501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the
+state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal
+Revenue Service. The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification
+number is 64-6221541. Its 501(c)(3) letter is posted at
+https://pglaf.org/fundraising. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg
+Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent
+permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state's laws.
+
+The Foundation's principal office is located at 4557 Melan Dr. S.
+Fairbanks, AK, 99712., but its volunteers and employees are scattered
+throughout numerous locations. Its business office is located at
+809 North 1500 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887, email
+business@pglaf.org. Email contact links and up to date contact
+information can be found at the Foundation's web site and official
+page at https://pglaf.org
+
+For additional contact information:
+ Dr. Gregory B. Newby
+ Chief Executive and Director
+ gbnewby@pglaf.org
+
+
+Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg
+Literary Archive Foundation
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without wide
+spread public support and donations to carry out its mission of
+increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be
+freely distributed in machine readable form accessible by the widest
+array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations
+($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt
+status with the IRS.
+
+The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating
+charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United
+States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a
+considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up
+with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations
+where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To
+SEND DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any
+particular state visit https://pglaf.org
+
+While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we
+have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition
+against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who
+approach us with offers to donate.
+
+International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make
+any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from
+outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff.
+
+Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation
+methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other
+ways including including checks, online payments and credit card
+donations. To donate, please visit: https://pglaf.org/donate
+
+
+Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
+works.
+
+Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project Gutenberg-tm
+concept of a library of electronic works that could be freely shared
+with anyone. For thirty years, he produced and distributed Project
+Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer support.
+
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed
+editions, all of which are confirmed as Public Domain in the U.S.
+unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not necessarily
+keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper edition.
+
+
+Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search facility:
+
+ https://www.gutenberg.org
+
+This Web site includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm,
+including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary
+Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to
+subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks.