diff options
| author | Roger Frank <rfrank@pglaf.org> | 2025-10-15 04:48:25 -0700 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Roger Frank <rfrank@pglaf.org> | 2025-10-15 04:48:25 -0700 |
| commit | e96455d6270c9e00a47bed10cc2b09de70dba861 (patch) | |
| tree | d2d83cb15894c0fc09d02a9620b8e16f2fce611f /16233.txt | |
Diffstat (limited to '16233.txt')
| -rw-r--r-- | 16233.txt | 3035 |
1 files changed, 3035 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/16233.txt b/16233.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..5292b98 --- /dev/null +++ b/16233.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3035 @@ +The Project Gutenberg EBook of An Essay towards Fixing the True Standards +of Wit, Humour, Railery, Satire, and Ridicule (1744), by Corbyn Morris + +This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with +almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or +re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included +with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org + + +Title: An Essay towards Fixing the True Standards of Wit, Humour, Railery, Satire, and Ridicule (1744) + +Author: Corbyn Morris + +Commentator: James L. Clifford + +Release Date: July 7, 2005 [EBook #16233] + +Language: English + +Character set encoding: ASCII + +*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK FIXING THE TRUE STANDARDS OF WIT *** + + + + +Produced by David Starner, Louise Hope and the Online +Distributed Proofreading Team at https://www.pgdp.net. + + + + + + + Series Two: + _Essays on Wit_ + + No. 4 + + + [Corbyn Morris] + _An Essay towards Fixing the True Standards + of Wit, Humour, Raillery, Satire, and Ridicule_ + (1744) + + + + + With an Introduction by + James L. Clifford + and + a Bibliographical Note + + + + +The Augustan Reprint Society +November, 1947 +Price: $1.00 + + * * * * * + + +GENERAL EDITORS + +RICHARD C. BOYS, University of Michigan +EDWARD NILES HOOKER, University of California, Los Angeles +H.T. SWEDENBERG, JR., University of California, Los Angeles + + +ADVISORY EDITORS + +EMMETT L. AVERY, State College of Washington +LOUIS I. BREDVOLD, University of Michigan +BENJAMIN BOYCE, University of Nebraska +CLEANTH BROOKS, Yale University +JAMES L. CLIFFORD, Columbia University +ARTHUR FRIEDMAN, University of Chicago +SAMUEL H. MONK, University of Minnesota +JAMES SUTHERLAND, Queen Mary College, London + + + * * * * * + + + INTRODUCTION + +The _Essay_ here reproduced was first advertised in the London _Daily +Advertiser_ as "this day was published" on Thursday, 17 May 1744 (The +same advertisement, except for the change of price from one shilling +to two, appeared in this paper intermittently until 14 June). Although +on the title-page the authorship is given as "By the Author of a +Letter from a By-stander," there was no intention of anonymity, since +the Dedication is boldly signed "Corbyn Morris, Inner Temple, Feb. 1, +1743 [44]." + +Not much is known of the early life of Corbyn Morris. Born 14 August +1710, he was the eldest son of Edmund Morris of Bishop's Castle, +Salop. (_Alumni Cantabrigienses_). On 17 September 1727 he was +admitted (pensioner) at Queen's College, Cambridge, as an exhibitioner +from the famous Charterhouse School. Exactly when he left the +university, or whether he took a degree, is not certain. + +Morris first achieved some prominence, though anonymously, with +_A Letter from a By-stander to a Member of Parliament; wherein is +examined what necessity there is for the maintenance of a large +regular land-force in this island_. This pamphlet, dated at the end, +26 February 1741/42, is a wholehearted eulogy of the Walpole +administration and is filled with statistics and arguments for the +Mercantilist theories of the day. At the time there was some suspicion +that the work had been written either by Walpole himself or by his +direction. When the _Letter from a By-stander_ was answered by the +historian Thomas Carte, an angry pamphlet controversy ensued, with +Morris writing under the pseudonym of "A Gentleman of Cambridge." +Throughout, Morris showed himself a violent Whig, bitter in his +attacks on Charles II and the non-jurors; and it was undoubtedly this +fanatical party loyalty which laid the foundation for his later +government career. + +The principal facts of Morris's later life may be briefly summarized. +On 17 June 1743 he was admitted at the Inner Temple. Throughout +the Pelham and Newcastle administrations he was employed by the +government, as he once put it, "in conciliating opponents." From +1751 to 1763 be acted as Secretary of the Customs and Salt Duty in +Scotland, in which post he was acknowledged to have shown decided +ability as an administrator. From 1763 to 1778 he was one of the +commissioners of customs. He died at Wimbledon 22 December 1779 +(_Musgrave's Obituary_), described in the _Gentleman's Magazine_ as a +"gentleman well known in the literary world, and universally esteemed +for his unwearied services and attachment to government." + +Throughout his long years of public service he wrote numerous +pamphlets, largely on economic and political questions. Merely the +titles of a few may be sufficient to indicate the nature of his +interests. _An Essay towards Deciding the Question whether Britain be +Permitted by Right Policy to Insure the Ships of Her Enemies _(1747); +_Observations on the Past Growth and Present State of the City of +London_ (containing a complete table of christenings and burials 1601- +1750) (175l); _A Letter Balancing the Causes of the Present Scarcity +of Our Silver Coin_ (1757). + +It would be a mistake, however, to consider Morris merely as a +statistical economist and Whig party hack. A gentleman of taste and +wit, the friend of Hume, Boswell, and other discerning men of the day, +he was elected F.R.S. in 1757, and appears to have been much +respected. In later life Morris had a country place at Chiltern Vale, +Herts., where he took an active delight in country sports. One +of his late pamphlets, not listed in the _D.N.B_. account of him, +entertainingly illustrates one of his hobbies. _The Bird-fancier's +Recreation and Delight, with the newest and very best instructions for +catching, taking, feeding, rearing, &c all the various sorts of SONG +BIRDS... containing curious remarks on the nature, sex, management, +and diseases of ENGLISH SONG BIRDS, with practical instructions for +distinguishing the cock and hen, for taking, choosing, breeding, +keeping, and teaching them to sing, for discovering and caring their +diseases, and of learning them to sing to the greatest perfection_. + +Although there is little surviving evidence of Morris's purely +literary interests, a set of verses combining his economic and +artistic views appeared in a late edition of _The New Foundling +Hospital for Wit_ (new edition, 1784, VI, 95). Occasioned by seeing +Bowood in Wiltshire, the home of the Earl of Shelburne, the lines are +entitled: "On Reading Dr. Goldsmith's Poem, the Deserted Village." + +This was the man who at the age of thirty-three brought out _An Essay +towards Fixing the True Standards of Wit, Humour, Raillery, Satire, +and Ridicule_. That it was ever widely read we have no evidence, but +at least a number of men of wit and judgment found it interesting. +Horace Walpole included it in a packet of "the only new books at all +worth reading" sent to Horace Mann, but the fulsome dedication +to the elder Walpole undoubtedly had something to do with this +recommendation. More disinterested approval is shown in a letter +printed in the _Daily Advertiser_ for 31 May 1744. Better than any +modern critique the letter illustrates the contemporary reaction to +the _Essay_. + + Christ Church College, Oxford, + + SIR: + + I have examin'd the _Essay_ you have sent me for _fixing the true + Standards of Wit, Humour, &c._ and cannot perceive upon what + pretence the Definitions, as you tell me, are censured for + Obscurity, even by Gentlemen of Abilities, and such as in other + Parts of the Work very frankly allow it's Merit: the Definition + of Wit, which presents itself at first, you say is, particularly + objected to, as dark and involv'd; in answer to which I beg Leave + to give you my plain Sentiments upon it, and which I apprehend + should naturally occur to every Reader: In treating upon Wit, the + Author seems constantly to carry in his View a Distinction + between _This_ and _Vivacity_: there is a Lustre or Brilliancy + which often results from wild unprovok'd Sallies of Fancy; but + such unexpected Objects, which serve not to _elucidate_ each + other, discover only a Flow of Spirits, or rambling Vivacity; + whereas, says he, Wit is the Lustre which results from the + quick _Elucidation_ of one Subject, by the just and unexpected + Arrangement of it with another Subject.--To constitute _Wit_, + there must not only arise a _Lustre_ from the quick Arrangement + together of two Subjects, but the new Subject must be naturally + introduced, and also serve to _elucidate_ the original one: the + Word _Elucidation_, though it be not new, is elegant, and very + happily applied in this Definition; yet I have seen some old + Gentlemen here stumble at it, and have found it difficult to + persuade them to advance farther:--I have also heard Objections + made to the Words _Lustre_ and _Brilliancy_ of Ideas, though they + are Terms which have been used by the _Greeks_ and _Romans_, and + by elegant Writers of all Ages and Nations; and the Effect which + they express, is perfectly conceiv'd and felt by every Person of + true Genius and Imagination. + + The Distinctions between _Wit_ and _Humour_, and the Reasons + why _Humour_ is more pleasurably felt than _Wit_, are new and + excellent: as is the Definition of an _Humourist_, and the happy + Analysis of the Characters of _Falstaff_, _Sir Roger de Coverly_, + and _Don Quixote_; But, as you say, the Merit of these Parts is + universally allowed; as well as the Novelty, and liberal Freedom + of the [word apparently omitted]; which have such Charms in my + Eye, as I had long ceased to expect in a Modern Writer. + + I am, &c + 25 May, 1744 + J---- W---- + [not identified] + +If the "Gentlemen of Abilities" of the day found some of Morris's +definitions obscure, modern readers will find them more precise than +those of most of his predecessors. All who had gone before--Cowley, +Barrow, Dryden, Locke, Addison, and Congreve (he does not mention +Hobbes)--Morris felt had bungled the job. And although he apologizes +for attempting what the great writers of the past had failed to do, he +has no hesitation in setting forth exactly what he believes to be the +proper distinctions in the meanings of such terms as wit, humour, +judgment, invention, raillery, and ridicule. The mathematician and +statistician in Morris made him strive for precise accuracy. It was +all very clear to him, and by the use of numerous anecdotes and +examples he hoped to make the distinctions obvious to the general +reader. + +The _Essay_ shows what a man of some evident taste and perspicacity, +with an analytical mind, can do in defining the subtle semantic +distinctions in literary terms. Trying to fix immutably what is +certain always to be shifting, Morris is noteworthy not only because +of the nature of his attempt, but because he is relatively so +successful. As Professor Edward Hooker has pointed out in an +Introduction to an earlier _ARS_ issue (Series I, No. 2), his is +"probably the best and clearest treatment of the subject in the first +half of the eighteenth century." It may be regretted that political +and economic concerns occupied so much of his later life, leaving him +no time for further literary essays. + +In the present facsimile edition, for reasons of space, only the +Introduction and the main body of the _Essay_ are reproduced. Although +Morris once remarked to David Hume that he wrote all his books "for +the sake of the Dedications" (_Letters of David Hume_ ed. Greig, I, +380), modern readers need not regret too much the omission of the +fulsome 32 page dedication to Walpole (The Earl of Orford). Morris +insists at the beginning that the book was inspired by a fervent +desire of "attempting a Composition, independent of Politics, which +might furnish an occasional Amusement" to his patron. The praise which +follows, in which Walpole is said to lead "the _Empire_ of _Letters_," +is so excessive as to produce only smiles in twentieth century +readers. Walpole is praised for not curbing the press while +necessarily curbing the theatre, his aid to commerce and industry, +indeed almost every act of his administration, is lauded to the skies. +The Church of England, in which "the _Exercise_ of _Reason_ in the +solemn Worship of God, is the sacred _Right_, and indispensible +_Duty_, of Man," receives its share of eulogy. In every connection the +Tories are violently attacked. + +The Dedication ends in a peroration of praise for Walpole's public +achievements which "shall adorn the History of _Britain_," and for his +"_Private Virtues_ and all the _softer Features_" of his mind. His +home of retirement is referred to in the lines of Milton: + + "Great Palace now of Light! + Hither, as to their Fountain, other Stars + Repairing, in their golden Urns, draw Light; + And here [sic] the Morning Planet gilds her Horns." + + [P.L. 7. 363-66] + +"Thus splendid, and superior, your Lordship now flourishes in +honourable Ease, exerting universal Benevolence...." But in +dedications, as in lapidary inscriptions, as Dr. Johnson might +have agreed, a writer need not be upon oath. + +At the end of the _Essay_ Morris reprinted two essays from _The +Spectator_, Nos. 35 and 62, and William Congreve's "An Essay concerning +Humour in Comedy. To Mr. Dennis" (Congreve's _Works_, ed. Summers, III, +161-68). Since these are readily available, they have not been included +in this edition. + +The present facsimile is made from a copy owned by Louis I. Bredvold, +with his kind permission. + +James L. Clifford + +Columbia University + + * * * * * + +[Transcriber's Note: +The ARS edition included an errata slip, reproduced here. Where +text was changed or deleted, the original is given in brackets. +Corrections to the _Essay_ itself are listed after the ARS errata.] + +Please paste the following in your copy of Corbyn Morris's +_Essay towards Fixing the True Standards of Wit_.... + +(_ARS_, Series One, No. 4) + +ERRATA + +INTRODUCTION: + +page 5, line 1--"word apparently omitted" should be inclosed in +brackets. + +page 5, line 6--"not identified" should be inclosed in brackets. + +page 6, line 5--the first "of" should be omitted. + ["modern readers need not regret too much of the omission + of the fulsome 32 page dedication"] + +page 6, line 12, should read + "Walpole is praised for not curbing the press while necessarily + curbing the theatre, his aid to commerce". + ["Walpole is praised for not curbing the theatre; his aid to + commerce"] + +page 6, line 25--"sic" should be inclosed in brackets, as also +"P.L. 7. 363-66" in the next line. + + +[ ESSAY ON WIT: + +page viii: Whence in _Aristotle_ such Persons are termed + "epidexioi", dexterous Men + The Greek _may_ read "epidezioi"; the letter-form makes it + uncertain. + +page 14: ... without any Reference to their whimsical _Oddities_ + or _Foibles_; + Text reads _Oddistie_. + +page 20 and elsewhere: "Biass" is an attested variant spelling; + it has not been changed. + +page 25: "teizes" (modern "teases") is an attested variant spelling; + it has not been changed. + +page 40: --It is therefore no wonder that Signior _Don Quixote of + la Mancha_ ... + Text reads _Quoxote_. ] + + + * * * * * + * * * * + * * * * * + + + An + ESSAY + + Towards Fixing the + TRUE STANDARDS + of + WIT, HUMOUR, RAILLERY, + SATIRE, and RIDICULE. + + + To which is Added, an + ANALYSIS + Of the CHARACTERS of + + An HUMOURIST, Sir John Falstaff, + Sir Roger De Coverly, + and Don Quixote. + + + + Inscribed to the RIGHT HONORABLE + ROBERT Earl of ORFORD. + + By the AUTHOR of a + LETTER from a BY-STANDER. + + ---- _Jacta est Alea_. + + + LONDON: + + Printed for J. ROBERTS, at the Oxford-Arms, + in Warwick-lane; and W. BICKERTON, + in the Temple-Exchange, near the + Inner-Temple-Gate, Fleet-Street. + + M DCC XLIV. [Price 2s.] + + * * * * * + + INTRODUCTION. + + +An Attempt to _describe_ the precise _Limits_ of WIT, HUMOUR, +RAILLERY, SATIRE and RIDICULE, I am sensible, is no easy or slight +Undertaking. To give a _Definition_ of WIT, has been declared by +Writers of the greatest Renown, to exceed their Reach and Power; and +Gentlemen of no less Abilities, and Fame, than _Cowley_, _Barrow_, +_Dryden_, _Locke_, _Congreve_, and _Addison_, have tryed their Force +upon this Subject, and have all left it free, and unconquered. This, +I perceive, will be an Argument with some, for condemning an _Essay_ +upon this Topic by a young Author, as rash and presumptious. But, +though I desire to pay all proper Respect to these eminent Writers, +if a tame Deference to great Names shall become fashionable, and the +Imputation of Vanity be laid upon those who examine their Works, all +Advancement in Knowledge will be absolutely stopp'd; and _Literary_ +Merit will be soon placed, in an _humble Stupidity_, and _solemn +Faith_ in the Wisdom of our Ancestors. + +Whereas, if I rightly apprehend, _an Ambition to excell_ is the +Principle which should animate a Writer, directed by a _Love_ of +_Truth_, and a _free Spirit_ of _Candour_ and _Inquiry_. This is the +_Flame_ which should warm the rising Members of every Science, not a +poor Submission to those who have preceded. For, however it may be +with a _Religious_ DEVOTION, a _Literary_ One is certainly the CHILD +of _Ignorance_. + +However, I must acknowledge, that where I have differed from the great +Authors before mentioned, it has been with a Diffidence, and after the +most serious and particular Examination of what they have delivered. +It is from hence, that I have thought it my Duty, to exhibit with the +following _Essay_, their several Performances upon the same Subject, +that every Variation of mine from their Suffrage, and the Reasons upon +which I have grounded it, may clearly appear. + + +The following _Ode_ upon WIT is written by Mr. _Cowley_. + + ODE of WIT. + + I. + +Tell me, oh tell!, what kind of Thing is _WIT_, + Thou who _Master_ art of it; +For the _first Matter_ loves Variety _less_; +Less _Women_ love't, either in _Love_ or _Dress_. + A thousand diff'rent Shapes it bears, + Comely in thousand Shapes appears; +Yonder we saw it plain, and here 'tis now, +Like _Spirits_ in a Place, we know not _how_. + + II. + +_London_, that vents of _false Ware_ so much Store, + In no _Ware_ deceives us more; +For Men, led by the _Colour_, and the Shape, +Like _Zeuxis' Bird_, fly to the painted Grape. + Some things do through our Judgment pass, + As through a _Multiplying Glass_: +And sometimes, if the _Object_ be too far, +We take a _falling Meteor_ for a _Star_. + + III. + +Hence 'tis a _Wit_, that greatest _Word_ of Fame, + Grows such a common Name; +And _Wits_, by our _Creation_, they become; +Just so as _Tit'lar Bishops_ made at _Rome_. + 'Tis not a _Tale_, 'tis not a _Jest_, + Admir'd with _Laughter_ at a Feast, +Nor florid _Talk_ which can that _Title_ gain; +The _Proofs_ of _Wit_ for ever must remain. + + IV. + +'Tis not to force some Lifeless _Verses_ meet, + With their five gouty Feet. +All ev'ry where, like _Man's_, must be the _Soul_, +And _Reason_ the _inferior Pow'rs_ controul. + Such were the _Numbers_ which could call + The _Stones_ into the _Theban_ Wall. +Such _Miracles_ are ceas'd, and now we see +No _Towns_ or _Houses_ rais'd by _Poetry. + + V. + +Yet 'tis not to adorn, and gild each Part, + That shews more _Cost_ than _Art_. +_Jewels_ at _Nose_, and _Lips_, but ill appear; +Rather than _all Things Wit_, let _none_ be there. + Several _Lights_ will not be seen, + If there be nothing else between. +Men doubt; because they stand so thick i' th' Sky. +If those be _Stars_ which paint the _Galaxy_. + + VI. + +'Tis not when two like Words make up one Noise; + Jests for _Dutch Men_, and _English Boys_. +In which, who finds out _Wit_, the same may see +In _An'grams_ and _Acrostiques Poetry_. + Much less can that have any Place, + At which a _Virgin_ hides her Face; +Such _Dross_ the _Fire_ must purge away; 'Tis just +The _Author blush_, there where the _Reader_ must. + + VII. + +'Tis not such _Lines_ as almost crack the _Stage_, + When _Bajazet_ begins to rage; +Not a tall _Metaphor_ in th' _bombast Way_, +Nor the dry Chips of short-lung'd _Seneca_. + Nor upon all Things to obtrude, + And force some odd _Similitude_. +What is it then, which like the _Pow'r Divine_, +We only can by _Negatives_ define? + + VIII. + +In a true Piece of _Wit_, all Things must be, + Yet all Things there _agree_; +As in the _Ark_, join 'd without Force or Strife, +All _Creatures_ dwelt; all _Creatures_ that had Life. + Or as the _primitive Forms_ of all, + (If we compare great Things with small) +Which without _Discord_ or _Confusion_ lie, +In the strange _Mirror_ of the _Deity_. + + IX. + +But _Love_, that moulds _one Man_ up out of _two_, + Makes me forget, and injure you. +I took _You_ for _Myself_, sure when I thought +That You in any thing were to be taught. + Correct my Error with thy Pen, + And if any ask me then, +What thing right _Wit_, and Height of _Genius_ is, +I'll only shew your _Lines_, and say, _'Tis this_. + +The _Spirit_ and _Wit_ of this _Ode_ are excellent; and yet it is +evident, through the whole, that Mr. _Cowley_ had no clear Idea of +_Wit_, though at the same time it _shines_ in most of these Lines: +There is little Merit in saying what WIT _is not_, which is the chief +Part of this _Ode_. Towards the End, he indeed attempts to describe what +_it is_, but is quite vague and perplex'd in his Description; and at +last, instead of collecting his scatter'd Rays into a _Focus_, and +exhibiting succinctly the clear Essence and Power of WIT, he drops the +whole with a trite Compliment. + +The learned Dr. _Barrow_, in his _Sermon against foolish Talking and +Jesting_, gives the following profuse Description of WIT. + + But first it may be demanded, What the Thing we speak of is? Or + what the Facetiousness (or _Wit_ as he calls it before) doth + import? To which Questions I might reply, as _Democritus_ did to + him that asked the Definition of a Man, _'Tis that we all see and + know._ Any one better apprehends what it is by Acquaintance, + than I can inform him by Description. It is indeed a Thing so + versatile and multiform, appearing in so many Shapes, so many + Postures, so many Garbs, so variously apprehended by several + Eyes and Judgments, that it seemeth no less hard to settle a + clear and certain Notion thereof, than to make a Portrait of + _Proteus_, or to define the Figure of the fleeting Air. Sometimes + it lieth in pat Allusion to a known Story, or in seasonable + Application of a trivial Saying, or in forging an apposite Tale: + Sometimes it playeth in Words and Phrases, taking Advantage from + the Ambiguity of their Sense, or the Affinity of their Sound: + Sometimes it is wrapp'd in a Dress of humorous Expression: + Sometimes it lurketh under an odd Similitude: Sometimes it + is lodged in a sly Question, in a smart Answer, in a quirkish + Reason, in a shrewd Intimation, in cunningly diverting, or + cleverly retorting an Objection: Sometimes it is couched in a + bold Scheme of Speech, in a tart Irony, in a lusty Hyperbole, + in a startling Metaphor, in a plausible Reconciling of + Contradictions, or in acute Nonsense; Sometimes a scenical + Representation of Persons or Things, a counterfeit Speech, a + mimical Look or Gesture passeth for it. Sometimes an affected + Simplicity, sometimes a presumptuous Bluntness giveth it Being. + Sometimes it riseth from a lucky Hitting upon what is Strange; + sometimes from a crafty wresting obvious Matter to the Purpose. + Often it' consisteth in one knows not what, and springeth + up one can hardly tell how. Its ways are unaccountable, and + inexplicable, being answerable to the numberless Rovings of + Fancy, and Windings of Language. It is, in short, a Manner + of Speaking out of the simple and plain Way (such as Reason + teacheth, and proveth Things by) which by a pretty, surprizing + Uncouthness in Conceit or Expression, doth affect and amuse the + Fancy, stirring in it some Wonder, and breeding some Delight + thereto. It raiseth Admiration, as signifying a nimble Sagacity + of Apprehension, a special Felicity of Invention, a Vivacity of + Spirit, and Reach of Wit, more than vulgar; it seeming to argue a + rare Quickness of Parts, that one can fetch in remote Conceits + applicable; a notable Skill that he can dextrously accommodate + them to the Purpose before him; together with a lively Briskness + of Humour, not apt to damp those Sportful Flashes of Imagination. + (Whence in _Aristotle_ such Persons are termed "epidexioi", + dexterous Men, and "eutropoi", Men of facile or versatile + Manners, who can easily turn themselves to all Things, or + turn all Things to themselves.) It also procureth Delight, + by gratifying Curiosity with its Rareness, or Semblance of + Difficulty. (As Monsters, not for their Beauty, but their + Rarity; as juggling Tricks, not for their Use, but their + Abstruseness, are beheld with Pleasure;) by diverting the Mind + from its Road of serious Thoughts, by instilling Gaiety, and + Airiness of Spirit; by provoking to such Disposition of Spirit + in Way of Emulation, or Complaisance; and by seasoning Matters + otherwise distasteful or insipid, with an unusual and thence + grateful Tange. + +This Description, it is easy to perceive, must have cost the Author of +it a great deal of Labour. It is a very full Specimen of that Talent +of entirely _exhausting_ a Subject, for which Dr. _Barrow_ was +remarkable; and if the _Point_ was, to exhibit all the various Forms +and Appearances, not of WIT only, but of _Raillery_, _Satire_, +_Sarcasms_, and of every Kind of _Poignancy_ and _Pleasantry_ of +Sentiment, and Expression, he seems to have perfectly succeeded; there +being perhaps no Variety, in all the Extent of these Subjects, which +he has not presented to View in this Description.--But he does not +pretend to give any _Definition_ of WIT, intimating rather that it is +quite impossible to be given: And indeed from his Description of it, +as a _Proteus_, appearing in numberless various Colours, and Forms; +and from his mistaking, and presenting for WIT, other different +Mixtures and Substances, it is evident that his Idea of it was quite +confused and uncertain: It is true, he has discovered a vast Scope of +Fertility of Genius, and an uncommon Power of collecting together a +Multitude of Objects upon any Occasion, but he has here absolutely +mistaken his work; for instead of exhibiting the Properties of WIT in +a clearer Light, and confuting the _false Claims_ which are made to +it, he has made it his whole Business to perplex it the more, by +introducing, from all Corners, a monstrous Troop of new unexpected +_Pretenders_. + +_Dryden_, in the Preface to his _Opera_, entitled, _The State of +Innocence_, or _Fall of Man_, gives the following _Decree_ upon WIT. + The _Definition of WIT_, (which has been so often attempted, and + ever unsuccessfully by many Poets) is only this: That it is _a + Propriety of Thoughts and Words; or in other Terms, Thoughts and + Words elegantly adapted to the Subject_. + +If Mr. _Dryden_ imagined, that he had succeeded _himself_ in this +_Definition_, he was extremely mistaken; for nothing can be more +distant from the Properties of WIT, than those he describes. He +discovers no Idea of the _Surprize_, and _Brilliancy_ of WIT, or of +the sudden _Light_ thrown upon a Subject. Instead of once pointing at +these, he only describes the Properties of clear _Reasoning_, which +are _a Propriety of Thoughts and Words_;--Whereas WIT, in its sudden +_Flashes_, makes no Pretension to _Reasoning_; but is perceived in the +pleasant _Surprize_ which it starts, and in the _Light_ darted upon +a Subject, which instantly vanishes again, without abiding a strict +Examination. + +The other Definition he gives, which is, _Thoughts and Words elegantly +adapted to the Subject_, is very different from the former, but +equally unhappy. + +For _Propriety_, in _Thoughts_ and _Words_, consists in exhibiting +_clear, pertinent Ideas_, in _precise_ and _perspicuous Words_. + +Whereas ELEGANCE consists in the _compt_, _well pruned_ and _succinct +Turn_ of a Subject. + +The Object of the _First_, is to be _clear_, and _perspicuous_; whence +it often appears in pursuit of these, not _compt_ or _succinct_: +Whereas the _Essence_ of ELEGANCE is to be _compt_ and _succinct_, +for the Sake of which Ornaments it often neglect _Perspicuity_, and +_Clearness_.--In short, a _Propriety_ of Thoughts and Words, may +subsist without any _Elegance_; as an _Elegance_ of Thoughts and Words +may appear without a perfect _Propriety_. + +The last _Definition_, as it is thus very different from the former is +also equally unhappy: For ELEGANCE is no _essential_ Property of WIT. +_Pure_ WIT resulting solely from the _quick Elucidation_ of one +Subject, by the sudden _Arrangement_, and _Comparison_ of it, +with another Subject.--If the two Objects _arranged_ together are +_elegant_, and _polite_, there will then be superadded to the WIT, +an _Elegance_ and _Politeness_ of Sentiment, which will render the +WIT more amiable. But if the Objects are _vulgar_, _obscene_, or +_deformed_, provided the _first_ be _elucidated_, in a lively Manner, +by, the sudden _Arrangement_ of it with the _second_, there will be +equally WIT; though, the Indelicacy of Sentiment attending it, will +render such WIT shocking and abominable. + +It is with the highest Respect for the great Mr. _Locke_, that I +deliver his Sentiments upon this Subject. + + And hence, perhaps, may be given some Reason of that common + Observation, that Men who have a great deal of _Wit_, and prompt + Memories, have not always the clearest Judgment or deepest + Reason: For _Wit_ lying most in the Assemblage of _Ideas_, and + putting those together with Quickness and Variety, wherein can be + found any Assemblance or Congruity, thereby to make up pleasant + Pictures, and agreeable Visions in the Fancy. _Judgment_, on the + contrary, lies quite on the other side; in separating carefully + one from another, _Ideas_, wherein can be found the least + Difference, thereby to avoid being missed by Similitude, and + by Affinity to take one thing for another. This is a Way of + proceeding quite contrary to Metaphor and Allusion; wherein for + the most Part lies that Entertainment and Pleasantry of _Wit_, + which strikes so lively on the Fancy, and therefore is acceptable + to all People, because its Beauty appears at first Sight, and + there is required no Labour of Thoughts to examine what Truth, + or Reason, there is in it. The Mind, without looking any further, + rests satisfied with the Agreeableness of the Picture, and the + Gaiety of the Fancy. And it is a kind of an Affront to go about + to examine it by the severe Rules of Truth, and good Reason, + whereby it appears, that it conflicts in something that is not + perfectly conformable to them. + +It is to be observed that Mr. _Locke_ has here only occasionally, +and passantly, delivered his Sentiments upon this Subject; but yet he +has very happily explained the chief Properties of WIT. It was _his_ +Remark _First_, that it lies for the most _Part_ in _assembling_ +together with _Quickness_ and _Variety_ Objects, which possess an +_Affinity_, or _Congruity_, with each other; which was the _first_ +just Information obtained by the literary World, upon this Subject. + +As to what he adds, That the Intention, and Effects, of this +_Assemblage_ of _similar_ Objects, is _to make up pleasant Pictures, +and agreeable Visions in the Fancy_, it is, as I humbly apprehend, not +quite perfect: For the Business of this _Assemblage_ is not merely to +raise pleasant Pictures in the Fancy, but also to _enlighten_ +thereby the _original_ Subject.--This is evident; because in such +_Assemblages_, the only Foundation upon which the _new Subject_ +is suddenly introduced, is the _Affinity_, and consequently the +_Illustration_, it bears to the _first_ Subject.--The Introduction of +pleasant Pictures and Visions, which present not a new _Illustration_, +and _Light_, to the _original_ Subjects, being rather wild Sallies of +_Vivacity_, than well-aimed, apposite Strokes of WIT. + +It is Mr. _Locke_'s Conclusion, at last, That WIT _consists in +something that is not perfectly conformable to Truth, and good +Reason_.--This is a _Problem_ of some Curiosity; and I apprehend +Mr. _Locke_'s Determination upon it to be right:--For the _Direction_ +of WIT is absolutely different from the _Direction of_ TRUTH and GOOD +REASON; It being the Aim of WIT to strike the _Imagination_; of TRUTH +and GOOD REASON, to convince the _Judgment_: From thence they can +never be perfectly coincident. + +It is however true, that there may be Instances of WIT, wherein the +_Agreement_ between the two Objects shall be absolutely _just_, and +perceived to be such at the first Glance. Such Instances of WIT, will +be then also _Self-evident_ TRUTHS. They will _both_ agree in their +obvious, and quick _Perspicuity_; but will be still different in this, +that the Effort of the _One_ is to strike the _Fancy_, whereas the +_Other_ is wholly exerted in gratifying the _Judgment_. + +The Sentiments of Mr. _Addison_ upon WIT, are professedly delivered in +the _Spectator_ No. 62. annexed to the following _Essay_. He has there +justly commended Mr. _Locke_'s Description of WIT; but what he adds, +by Way of Explanation to it, that the _Assemblage_ of Ideas must be +such as shall give _Delight_, and _Surprize_, is not true, in regard +to the Former, _Delight_ being no _essential_ Property of WIT; for +if the _original_ Subject be unpleasant, or deformed, the sudden +unexpected _Arrangement_ of a _similar_ Object with it, may give us +_Surprize_, and be indisputably WIT, and yet be far from creating any +_Delight_. + +This Gentleman has also given the following Example, in order to +illustrate the Necessity there is, that _Surprize_ should be always +an Attendant upon WIT. + + "When a Poet tells us, the Bosom of his Mistress is as white as + Snow, there is no _Wit_ in the Comparison; but when he adds, + with a Sigh, that it as cold too, it then grows to Wit." + +--To compare a Girl's _Bosom_ to _Snow_ for its _Whiteness_ I +apprehend to be WIT, notwithstanding the Authority of so great a +Writer to the contrary. For there is a _Lustre_ resulting from the +_natural_ and _splendid Agreement_ between these Objects, which will +_always_ produce WIT; such, as cannot be destroyed, though it will +quickly be rendered _trite_, by frequent Repetition. + +This _Problem_, _How far_ SURPRIZE _is, or is not, necessary to_ WIT, +I humbly apprehend, may be thus solved.--In Subjects which have a +_natural_ and _splendid Agreement_, there will always be WIT upon +their _Arrangement_ together; though when it becomes _trite_, and not +accompanied with _Surprize_, the _Lustre_ will be much faded;--But +where the _Agreement_ is _forced_ and _strained_, _Novelty_ and +_Surprize_ are absolutely necessary to usher it in; An unexpected +_Assemblage_ of this Sort, striking our Fancy, and being gaily +admitted at first to be WIT; which upon frequent Repetition, the +_Judgment_ will have examined, and rise up against it wherever it +appears;--So that in short, in Instances where the _Agreement_ is +_strained_ and _defective_, which indeed are abundantly the most +general, _Surprize_ is a necessary _Passport_ to WIT; but _Surprize_ +is not necessary to WIT, where the _Agreement_ between the two +Subjects is _natural_ and _splendid_; though in these Instances +it greatly heightens the _Brillancy_. + +The subsequent Remark of Mr. _Addison_, _That the Poet, after saying +his Mistress's Bosom is as white as Snow, should add, with a Sigh, +that it is as cold too, in order that it may grow to_ WIT, is I fear, +very incorrect. For as to the _Sigh_, it avails not a Rush; and this +Addition will be found to be only a _new_ Stroke of WIT, equally +_trite_, and less perfect, and natural, than the former Comparison. + +It may also be observed, That Mr. _Addison_ has omitted the +_Elucidation_ of the _original_ Subject, which is the grand Excellence +of WIT. Nor has he prescribed any _Limits_ to the Subjects, which are +to be arranged together; without which the Result will be frequently +the SUBLIME or BURLESQUE; In which, it is true, WIT often appears, +but taking their whole Compositions together, they are different +Substances, and usually ranked in different _Classes_. + +All that Mr. _Congreve_ has delivered upon WIT, as far as I know, +appears in his _Essay_ upon HUMOUR, annexed to this Treatise. He +there says, + To define HUMOUR, perhaps, were as difficult, as to define WIT; + for, like that, it is of infinite Variety. +--Again, he afterwards adds, + But though we cannot certainly tell what WIT is, or what HUMOUR + is, yet we may _go near_ to shew something, which is not WIT, or + not HUMOUR, and yet often mistaken for both. +--In this _Essay_, wherein he particularly considers HUMOUR, and +the Difference between _this_, and WIT, he may be expected to have +delivered his best Sentiments upon both: But these Words, which I +have quoted, seem to be as important and precise, as any which he has +offered upon the Subject of WIT. As such, I present them, without any +Remarks, to my Reader, who, if he only _goes near_ to be _edified_ by +them, will discover a great Share of _Sagacity_. + +The Sentiments of these eminent Writers upon WIT, having thus been +exhibited, I come next to the Subject of HUMOUR. This has been +_defined_ by some, in the following Manner, with great _Perspicuity._ +--HUMOUR is the genuine WIT of _Comedies_,--which has afforded +vast Satisfaction to many _Connoissures_ in the _Belles Lettres_; +especially as WIT has been supposed to be incapable of any +_Definition._ + +This Subject has also been particularly considered by the +_Spectatator_ No. 35. inserted at the End of the following +_Essay_. Mr. _Addison_ therein _gravely_ remarks, that + It is indeed much easier to describe what is not HUMOUR, than + what it is; +which, I humbly apprehend, is no very _important_ Piece of +Information.--He adds, + And very difficult to define it otherwise, than as _Cowly_ has + done WIT, by Negatives. +This Notion of _defining_ a Subject by _Negatives_, is a favourite +_Crotchet_, and may perhaps be assumed upon other Occasions by future +Writers: I hope therefore I shall be pardoned, if I offer a proper +Explanation of so good a _Conceit_;--To declare then, _That a Subject is +only to be_ DEFINED _by_ NEGATIVES, is to cloath it in a _respectable_ +Dress of _Darkness_. And about as much as to say, That it is a _Knight_ +of _tenebrose Virtues_; or a _serene Prince_, of the _Blood_ of _Occult +Qualities_. + +Mr. _Addison_ proceeds, + Were I to give my own Notions of HUMOUR, I should deliver them + after _Plato's_ Manner, in a Kind of Allegory; and by supposing + HUMOUR to be a Person, deduce to him, all his Qualifications, + according to the following Genealogy: TRUTH was the Founder of + the Family, and the Father of GOOD SENSE; GOOD SENSE was the + Father of WIT, who married a Lady of a collateral Line called + MIRTH, by whom he had Issue HUMOUR. +--It is very unfortunate for this _Allegorical_ Description, that +there is not one Word of it just: For TRUTH, GOOD SENSE, WIT, and +MIRTH, represented to be the immediate _Ancestors_ of HUMOUR; whereas +HUMOUR is derived from the _Foibles_, and whimsical _Oddities_ +of _Persons_ in real Life, which flow rather from their +_Inconsistencies_, and _Weakness_, than from TRUTH and GOOD SENSE; +Nor is WIT any _Ancestor_ of HUMOUR, but of a quite different +_Family_; it being notorious that much HUMOUR may be drawn from +the Manners of _Dutchmen_, and of the most formal and dull Persons, +who are yet never guilty of WIT. Again, MIRTH is not so properly +the _Parent_ of HUMOUR, as the _Offspring_.--In short, this whole +_Genealogy_ is a _nubilous_ Piece of Conceit, instead of being any +_Elucidation_ of HUMOUR. It is a formal Method of trifling, introduced +under a deep Ostentation of Learning, which deserves the severest +Rebuke.--But I restrain my Pen, recollecting the _Visions_ of MIRZA, +and heartily profess my high Veneration for their admirable Author. + +The _Essay_ upon HUMOUR, at the End of this Treatise, written by +Mr. _Congreve_, is next to be considered. It appears, that at first +he professes his absolute Uncertainty in regard to this Subject; and +says, "_We cannot certainly tell what_ WIT _is, or what_ HUMOUR _is_." +But yet, through his whole Piece, he neglects the Subject of HUMOUR in +general, and only discourses upon the HUMOUR, by which he means barely +the _Disposition_, of Persons: This may particularly appear from the +following Words. + + A Man may change his Opinion, but I believe he will find it a + Difficulty to part with his HUMOUR; and there is nothing more + provoking than the being made sensible of that Difficulty. + Sometimes we shall meet with those, who perhaps indifferently + enough, but at the same time impertinently, will ask the + Question, WHY ARE YOU NOT MERRY? WHY ARE YOU NOT GAY, PLEASANT, + AND CHEARFUL? Then instead of answering, could I ask such a + Person, WHY ARE YOU NOT HANDSOME? WHY HAVE YOU NOT BLACK EYES, + AND A BETTER COMPLEXION? Nature abhors to be forced. + + The two famous Philosophers of _Ephesus_ and _Abdera_, have their + different Sects at this Day. Some weep, and others laugh at one + and the same Thing. + + I don't doubt but you have observed several Men laugh when they + are angry; others, who are silent; some that are loud; yet I + cannot suppose that it is the Passion of ANGER, which is in + itself different, or more or less in one than t'other, but that + it is the HUMOUR of the Man that is predominant, and urges him to + express it in that Manner. Demonstrations of PLEASURE, are as + various: One Man has a HUMOUR of retiring from all Company, when + any thing has happened to please him beyond Expectation; he hugs + himself alone, and thinks it an Addition to the Pleasure to keep + it a Secret, &c. + +All which, I apprehend, is no more than saying; That there are different +_Dispositions_ in different _Persons_. + +In another Place, he seems to understand by _Humour_, not only the +_Disposition,_ but the _Tone_ of the _Nerves_, of a Person, +thus, + + "Suppose MOROSE to be a Man naturally splenetic, and melancholy; + is there any thing more offensive to one of such a DISPOSITION + (where he uses the Word instead of _Humour_) than Noise and + Clamour? Let any Man that has the Spleen (and there are enough in + England) be Judge. We see common Examples of this HUMOUR in + little every Day. 'Tis ten to one, but three Parts in four of the + Company you dine with, are discomposed, and started at the + cutting of a Cork, or scratching of a Plate with a Knife; it is + a Proportion of the same HUMOUR, that makes such, or any other + Noise, offensive to the Person that hears it; for there are + others who will not be disturbed at all by it. + +At this Rate every _Weakness_ of _Nerves_, or _Particularity_ of +_Constitution,_ is HUMOUR. + +It is true, he justly points out in another Place the different +Sentiments, which ought to be adapted to different _Characters_ in +_Comedy_, according to their different _Dispositions_, or, as he +phrases it, _Humours_: As for Instance, he very rightly observes, + That a Character of a splenetic and peevish HUMOUR, Should have + a satirical WIT. A jolly and sanguine HUMOUR should have a + facetious WIT. +--But still this is no Description of what is well felt, and known, by +the general Name of HUMOUR. + +However, as what I have already quoted, may appear to be only his +looser Explanations, it will be necessary to deliver his more closed +and collected Sentiments upon this Subject. These he gives in the +following Words, + I should be unwilling to venture, even in a bare _Description_ of + _Humour_, much more to make a _Definition_ of it; but now my Hand + is in, I will tell you what serves me instead of either. I take + it to be, _A singular and unavoidable Manner of doing or saying + any thing, peculiar and natural to one Man only, by which his + Speech and Actions are distinguished from those of other Men." +--This Description is very little applicable to HUMOUR, but tolerably +well adapted to other Subjects.--Thus, a Person, who is happy in a +particular _Grace_, which accompanies all his Actions, may be said to +possess _a singular and unavoidable Manner of doing or saying any +thing, peculiar and natural to him only, by which his Speech and +Actions are distinguished from those of other Men_. And the same +may be said of a Person of a peculiar _Vivacity_, _Heaviness_, +or _Awkwardness_.--In short, this Description is suited to any +_Particularity_ of a Person in general, instead of being adapted +to the _Foibles_ and _whimsical Oddities_ of Persons, which alone +constitute HUMOUR. + +These are the only Pieces upon WIT, and HUMOUR, which have fallen +within my Knowledge; I have here fairly delivered them at length; +and from the Respect which is due to such eminent Writers, have +distinctly and deliberately examined the Merit of each.--As to my +own _Performance_, which is now submitted to the Public, I have to +wish, that it may gain a candid and strict Examination. It has been +my Endeavour to give _Definitions_ of the Subjects, upon which I have +treated; A _Plan_ the most difficult of all others to be executed by +an Author; But such an one, as I apprehend, deserves to be more +generally introduced, and established. If once it was expected by the +Public, that _Authors_ should strictly _define_ their Subjects, it +would instantly checque an Inundation of Scribbling. The _desultory_ +Manner of Writing would be absolutely exploded; and _Accuracy_ and +_Precision_ would be necessarily introduced upon every Subject. + +This is the _Method_ pursued in Subjects of _Philosophy_; Without +clear and precise _Definitions_ such noble Advances could never have +been made in those Sciences; And it is by the Assistance of _these_ +only, that Subjects of _Polite Literature_, can ever be enlightened +and embellished with just Ornaments. If _Definitions_ had been +constantly exacted from Authors there would not have appeared _one +hundreth_ Part of the present Books, and yet every Subject had been +better ascertained.--Nor will this Method, as some may imagine, be +encumbered with Stiffness; On the contrary, in _illustrating_ the +Truth of _Definitions_ there is a full Scope of the utmost Genius, +Imagination, and Spirit of a Writer; and a Work upon this _Plan_ is +adorned with the highest Charms appearing with _Propriety_, +_Clearness_, and _Conviction_, as well as Beauty. + +It is true, that the Difficulties, which attend an able Execution +of this _Method_, are not open to a careless Eye; And it is some +Mortification to an _Author_ upon this _Plan_, that his greatest +_Merit_ is likely to lie concealed; A _Definition,_ or _Distinction,_ +which after much Attention and Time he has happily delivered with +_Brevity_ and _Clearness_, appearing hereby quite obvious, to others, +and what they cannot imagine could require Pains to discover. + +As to the _Examples_, by which I have illustrated the _Definition_ of +_Wit_, they are _common_ and _trite_; but are the best, which I could +find upon deliberate Enquiry. Many Modern instances of _Wit_, which +left very lively Impressions upon me, when I heard them, appearing +upon Re-examination to be quite strained and defective. These, which +I have given, as they are thus _trite_, are not designed in themselves +for any Entertainment to the Reader; but being various, and distant +from each other, they very properly serve to explain the Truth, and +Extent of the _Definition_. + +The Character of an HUMOURIST, I expect, will be strange to most of +my Readers; and if no Gentleman is acquainted with a _Person_ of this +_Cast_, it must pass for a _Monster_ of my own Creation;--As to the +Character of Sir _John Falstaff_, it is chiefly extracted from +_Shakespear_, in his 1st Part of King _Henry_ the _IVth_; But so far +as _Sir John_ in _Shakspear's_ Description, sinks into a _Cheat_ or a +_Scoundrel_, upon any Occasion, he is different from that _Falstaff_, +who is designed in the following _Essay_, and is entirely an amiable +Character. + +It is obvious, that the Appearance, which _Falstaff_ makes, in the +unfinished Play of _The Merry Wives of Windsor_, is in general greatly +below his true Character. His Imprisonment and Death in the latter +Part of King _Henry_ the _IVth_, seem also to have been written by +_Shakespear_ in Compliance with the _Austerity_ of the Times; and in +order to avoid the Imputation of encouraging _Idleness_ and mirthful +_Riot_ by too amiable and happy an Example. + +The Criticism, which I have made, upon _Horace_'s Narrative of his +_Adventure_ with an _Impertinent Fellow_, I offer with Respect; And +beg leave to observe that the chief Part which I object to, is the +_Propriety_ of his introducing himself in so _ridiculous a Plight_; + --Dum sudor ad imos + Manaret Talos; +And + Demitto Auriculas, ut iniquae mentis Acellus + Cum gravius dorso subiit onus. +And other Representations of the same sort, seem to place _Horace_ +in a very mean and ludicrous Light; which it is probable he never +apprehended in the full Course of exposing his Companion;--Besides, +the Conduct of his Adversary is in several Places, excessively, and, +as it may be construed, _designedly_, insolent and contemptuous; and +as no Merit or Importance belongs to this Person, there appears no +Reason why _Horace_ should endure such Treatment; or, if the other was +too _powerful_ for him, it is not an _Adventure_ of _Honour_; or what +_Horace_ should chuse to expose to the World in this manner, with all +the Particulars of his own despicable Distress. + +However, the _Mirth_ which results from this Narrative, as it +now stands, is perhaps rather the stronger at first, by the full +_Ridicule_ which lies against _Horace_, and his Adversary;--But, upon +Reflection, there arises a Disgust, at the Impropriety of _Horace's_ +exposing his own _Meanness_, as well as at the nauseous _Impudence_ +of his Companion. + +As to _uncommon_ Words, if any such appear in this _Introduction_, +or in the following _Essay_, I hope they want neither _Propriety_, +_Clearness_, nor _Strength_;--And if the _Length_of this Piece to an +_Essay_ so _short_ shall happen at first to _disturb_ any _Critic_, +I beg leave to inform him, that all, which can be fairly collected +from it, is only, that it may have cost _me_ the more Trouble;--But +upon mentioning the _Length_ of this Piece, what behoves me the most, +is, to return my Thanks to two _Gentlemen_, who suffered me to read to +them the whole, as it was gradually written; And by whose _judicious_ +and _friendly Instructions_ in the Course of it, my own _Imagination_ +was often prevented from running into _Riots_. + +However, I am far from imagining, that I have always been reduced +within just Bounds; And now feel a sufficient Share of _Concern_ and +_Anxiety_, for the _Fate_ of this Work;--Yet, I humbly apprehend, that +_this_ must freely be allowed me, that I have not been a _Plagiary_; +But have constantly delivered my own _original_ Sentiments, without +_purloining_ or _disfiguring_ the Thoughts of others; An _Honesty_, +which, I hope, is laudable in an _Author_; And as I have not _stolen_, +neither have I _concealed_, the _Merit_ of other Writers. + +It will also be found, as I humbly apprehend, that I have never +_shunned_ the Subject: I mention this particularly, because it is +the Practice of many eminent Writers, after much _curvetting_ and +_prauncing_, suddenly to wheel, and retire, when they are expected +to make their most full Attack.--These Gentlemen, it is true, very +happily avoid _Danger_, and advance and retreat in _excellent Order_: +But, with their Leave, I must observe that they never do any +_Execution_; For Subjects, which have not been surveyed, and laid +open, are like _fortified Places_; and it is the Business of a +_Writer_, as well as of a _Soldier_, to make an Attack;--This has been +the Conduct I have held in the following _Essay_; and however I may +be _shattered_ upon any Occasion, I hope it will appear (if I may be +allowed the Expression) that I have fairly _charged_ the Subjects. + +Having offered these Circumstances in my Favour, I must frankly +acknowledge, that I am not able to plead any _Hurry_ or _Precipitancy_ +in the publishing of this Work, in Excuse of its Errors; Though +I clearly understand, that by making this Discovery, I absolutely +deprive myself of the most _genteel_ and _fashionable Screen_ now used +by Authors;--But I imagined, that it became me to spare no Labour or +Attention upon a Work, which I should presume to offer to the World; +Happening to esteem this _Care_ and _Concern_, a _Respect_ due to the +_Public_, and the proper Species of _Humility_ and _Modesty_ in an +_Author_. + + + * * * * * + + An + ESSAY + on + Wit, Humour, Raillery, & c. + + + WIT is the LUSTRE resulting from the quick ELUCIDATION of one + Subject, by a _just_ and unexpected ARRANGEMENT of it with + another Subject. + +This _Definition_ of WIT will more clearly appear by a short +Explanation. + +It is the Province of WIT to _elucidate_, or _enlighten_ a Subject, +not by reasoning upon that Subject, but by a just and unexpected +Introduction of another _similar_, or _opposite_ Subject; whereby, +upon their _Arrangement_ together, the _original_ Subject may be _set +off_, and more clearly _enlighten'd_, by their obvious Comparison. + +It may be proper, for the sake of Distinction, to call the Subject, +which is the Basis and Ground-work, the _original_ Subject; and that +which is introduced, in order to _elucidate_ it, the _auxiliary_ +Subject. + +That there be always an apparent Chain or Connexion, or else an +obvious Agreement or Contrast, between the two Subjects, is absolutely +requir'd, in order that the _Auxiliary_ one may be _justly_ +introduced; otherwise, instead of WIT, there will only appear +a rambling _Vivacity_, in wild, unprovoked Sallies. + +And yet _every just_ or _natural_ Introduction of an _auxiliary_ +Subject will not produce WIT, unless a new _Lustre_ is reflected +from thence upon the _original_ Subject. + +It is further to be observed, that the Introduction of the _auxiliary_ +Subject ought not only to be _just_, but also _unexpected_, which are +entirely consistent together; For as every Subject bears various +Relations and Oppositions to other Subjects, it is evident that each +of these Relations and Oppositions upon being exhibited, will be +_unexpected_ to the Persons, who did not perceive them before; and +yet they are _just_ by Supposition. + +It is upon such _unexpected_ Introductions of _auxiliary_ Subjects, +that we are struck with a _Surprize_; from whence the high +_Brilliancy_ and _Sparkling_ of WIT, result. + +Whereas _Auxiliary_ Subjects, introduced upon such Occasions, as they +have been frequently exhibited before, are apt to fall dull, and heavy +upon the Fancy; and unless they possess great natural Spirit, will +excite no sprightly Sensation. + +It is also necessary to observe, that, in WIT, the Subjects concern'd +must be _ordinary_ and _level_; By which are intended, not such as +are _common_, but such as have no _extraordinarily exalted_, or +_enlarged_, Qualities; and are not _unsizeable_ in the particular +Circumstances in which they are compared to each other;--otherwise it +is easy to perceive, that the Result of their _Arrangement_ will not +be so properly WIT, as either the SUBLIME, or BURLESQUE. + +To all this is to be added, that either _Gallantry, Raillery_, +_Humour_, _Satire_, _Ridicule_, _Sarcasms_, or other Subjects, are +generally blended with WIT; It has been for want of this Discovery, +and of a proper Separation of these Subjects, that the Attempts which +have hitherto been made to _define_ WIT, have been all involv'd and +overwhelm'd in Perplexity; For the different Mixtures of these foreign +Ingredients with WIT, have discover'd such various and opposite +_Colours_ and _Substances_, as were impossible to be comprehended in +one certain steady _Definition_;--Whereas _pure_ WIT alone, constantly +appears in _one uniform_ Manner; which is, _In the _quick Elucidation_ +of one Subject, by _unexpectedly_ exhibiting its _Agreement_ or +_Contrast_ with another Subject_. + +It is proper in this Place, to distinguish between WIT, SIMILES, +and METAPHORS. SIMILES, though they _illustrate_ one Subject, by +_arranging_ it with another Subject, are yet different from WIT, +as they want its _sudden_ and _quick Elucidation_. + +Again; In WIT, the _Elucidation_ is thrown only upon _one_ Point of a +Subject; or if more Points be _elucidated_, they are so many different +Strokes of WIT;--Whereas every SIMILE touches the Subject it +_illustrates_ in _several Points_. + +It is from hence, that the _Elucidation_, as before mention'd, arising +from a SIMILE, is _slower_ than from WIT; But then is is generally +more _accurate_ and _compleat_;--In short, WIT, from its _Quickness_, +exhibits more _Brilliancy_, But SIMILES possess greater _Perfection_. + + A METAPHOR, is the _Arrayment_ of one Subject, with the _Dress_, + or _Colour_, or any _Attributes_, of another Subject. + +In WIT, the two Subjects are suddenly confronted with each other, +and upon their joint View, the _original_ one is _elucidated_ by the +obvious _Agreement_ or _Contrast_ of the _auxiliary_ Subject. + +But METAPHOR goes further, and not content with _arranging_ the two +Subjects together, and exhibiting from thence their _Agreement_ or +_Contrast_, it actually snatches the Properties of the _auxiliary_ +one, and fits them at once upon the _original_ Subject. + +It is evident from hence, that there may be WIT without any METAPHOR; +But in every just METAPHOR there is WIT; The _Agreement_ of the two +Subjects being in a METAPHOR more strictly and sensibly presented. + +There is also this Difference between WIT and METAPHOR, that in WIT +the _original_ Subject is _enlighten'd_, without altering its _Dress_; +whereas in METAPHOR the _original_ Subject is cloathed in a _new +Dress_, and struts forwards at once with a different _Air_, and with +strange _unexpected Ornaments_. + +It is from hence, that by METAPHOR a more masculine Air and Vigour is +given to a Subject, than by WIT; But it too often happens, that the +METAPHOR is carried so far, as instead of _elucidating_, to obscure +and disfigure, the _original_ Subject. + +To exhibit some Examples of WIT. + + +1. + +_Henry_ the IVth of _France_, intimating to the _Spanish_ Ambassador +the Rapidity, with which he was able to over-run _Italy_, told him, +that _if once he mounted on Horseback, he should breakfast at_ Milan, +_and dine at_ Naples; To which the Ambassador added, _Since your +Majesty travels at this rate, you may be at Vespers in_ Sicily. + +The Introduction of the _Vespers_ at SICILY is here _natural_, and +easy; as it seems only to be carrying on his Majesty's Journey at the +same rate, and to compleat the Progress of the Day; But it ushers at +once into View the _Destruction_ of the _French_ upon a _similar_ +Occasion, when they formerly over-ran SICILY, and were all massacred +there at the ringing of the Bell for _Vespers_;--The sudden +Introduction and _Arrangement_ of this Catastrophe, with the +Expedition then threaten'd, sets the Issue of such a Conquest in +a new _Light_; And very happily exhibits and _elucidates_ the Result +of such vain and restless Adventures. + +It may be observed, that the _quick_ Introduction and _Arrangement_ +of any former Conquest of _Italy_ by the _French_, with the Expedition +then threaten'd, would have exhibited WIT; whatever the Issue had been +of such former Conquest; But in this Instance, there sits couched +under the WIT, a very _severe Rebuke_ upon the _French_ Monarch. + + +2. + +_Alexander_ the VIth was very busily questioning the Ambassador of +_Venice_, Of whom his Masters held their Customs and Prerogatives of +the Sea? To which the Ambassador readily answer'd; _If your_ HOLINESS +_will only please to examine your Charter of St._ PETER's _Patrimony, +you will find upon the Back of it, the Grant made to the_ VENETIANS +_of the_ ADRIATIC. + +The Authority of the _Grant_ to the _Venetians_ is in this Instance +the _original_ Subject, which is thus suddenly _elucidated_ to the +_Pope_, by _arranging_, and connecting it with the holy _Charter_ of +St. _Peter_'s Patrimony; There is a peculiar Happiness in the Address +of this Answer to the _Pope_, as he was obliged to receive it as a +satisfactory Account of the Truth of the _Grant_, and a clear +_Elucidation_ of its sacred Authority. + +In this Instance, besides the WIT which shines forth, the _Pope_ is +severely expos'd to your _Raillery_, from the Scrape into which he has +brought the _Charter_ of St. _Peter's_ Patrimony, by his Attack of the +_Ambassador_; The _fictitious_ Existence of both the _Charter_ and +_Grant_ being sarcastically pointed out, under this respectable Air +of _Authenticity_. + + +3. + +Upon the Restoration Mr. _Waller_ presented a congratulatory Copy of +Verses to King _Charles_; His Majesty, after reading them, said,-- +_Mr_. Waller, _these are very good, but not so fine as you made upon +the_ PROTECTOR.--To which Mr. _Waller_ return'd,--_Your Majesty will +please to recollect, that we Poets always write best upon_ FICTIONS. + +The _original_ Subject in this Instance is _the superior Excellence of +Mr_. WALLER's _Verses upon_ Cromwell; This he most happily excuses, by +starting at once, and _arranging_ along with them, the Remark, that +_Poets have always excell'd upon Fiction_; whereby he unexpectedly +exhibits his _more excellent_ Verses to _Cromwell_, as a plain +_Elucidation_ of the _fictitious_ Glory of the Protector; And +intimates at the same time, that the _Inferiority_ of his present +Performance was a natural _Illustration_ of his Majesty's _real_ +Glory;--Never was a deep Reproach averted by a more happy Reply; which +comprehends both the highest Compliment to his Majesty, and a very +firm poetical Excuse of the different Performances. + + +4. + +_Leonidas_ the _Spartan_ General, when he advanced near the _Persian_ +Army, was told by one of his own Captains, that _their Enemies were so +numerous, it was impossible to see the Sun for the Multitude of their +Arrows_; To which he gallantly reply'd, _We shall then have the +Pleasure of fighting in the Shade_. + +The vast Cope of _Persian_ Arrows is here the _original_ Subject; +which instead of being observed by _Leonidas_ with Terror, presents +to his Fancy the pleasant Idea of a cool _Canopy_. There is an +_Agreement_ and Affinity between the two Objects, in regard to the +_Shelter from the Sun_, which is at once obvious, and _unexpected_; +And the Cloud of the Enemies Arrows is thus gaily _elucidated_, by the +_Arrangement_ and Comparison of it with so desirable an Object as +_shady Covering_. + +This Saying of the _Spartan_ General has been handed through many Ages +to the present Time; But the chief Part of the Pleasure it gives us, +results not so much from the WIT it contains, as from the _Gallantry_, +and _chearful Spirit_, discover'd in Danger, by _Leonidas_. + + +5. + +An Instance of WIT in the _Opposition_, I remember to have read +somewhere in the _Spectators_; where Sir _Roger de Coverley_ +intimating the Splendor which the perverse Widow should have appear'd +in, if she had commenced Lady _Coverley_, says: + +_That he would have given her a_ Coalpit _to have kept her in_ clean +Linnen: _And that her Finger should have_ sparkled _with one hundred +of his richest_ Acres. + +The joint Introduction of these _opposite_ Objects, as a _Coalpit_ +with _clean Linnen_, and _dirty Acres_ with the _Lustre_ of a _Jewel_, +is _just_ in this Instance, as they really produce each other in their +Consequences; The _natural Opposition_ between them, which is strongly +_elucidated_ by their _Arrangement_ together, and at the same time +their _unexpected Connexion_ in their Consequences, strike us with a +_Surprize_, which exhibits the _Brilliancy_ and _Sparkling_ of WIT. + +There is also in this Instance, besides the WIT, a Spirit of +_Generosity_, and _Magnificence_, discover'd by Sir _Roger_, from +the known Value of a _Coalpit_, and of so many rich _Acres_. + +This Kind of WIT, resulting from the sudden _Arrangement_ together of +two _opposite_ Objects, is rarer, than that which is obtained from +two _similar_ Objects; It abounds with a high _Surprize_, and +_Brilliancy_; and also strongly _elucidates_ the _original_ Object, +from the _Contrast_ presented between _this_, and the _auxiliary_ one; +In the same manner as _White_ is more clearly set _off_, by being +arranged with _Black_. + +It may be proper to observe, that WIT, besides being struck out by +_just_, and _direct_ Introductions of _auxiliary_ Subjects, is also +sometimes obtain'd by _Transitions_ from one Subject to another, by +the Help of an _equivocal Word_; which like a _Bridge_, with two +Roads meeting at the End of it, leads to two different Places. +_Transitions_, thus made from the right Course, have indeed the +Pretence of being _natural_; but they ought always to lead us +to something _brilliant_ or poignant, in order to justify their +_Deviation_; and not to end only at a ridiculous PUN, void of all +Spirit and Poignancy. + +The WIT, in such Instances, results, as in all others, from the quick +_Arrangement_ together of two Subjects; But that, which was first +intended for the _original_ one, is dropped; And a new _original_ +Subject is started, through the _double Meaning_ of a Word, and +suddenly _enlighten'd_. + +To give a _trite_ Instance of this kind of WIT. + +A PEER coming out of the House of Lords, and wanting his Servant, +called out, _Where's my Fellow?_ To which another PEER, who stood by +him, returned, _Faith, my Lord, not in_ England. + +A Transition is here unexpededly made from the Sense intended in the +Question to another Point, through the double Meaning of the word +_Fellow_; it being obvious, that his Lordship's _Servant_ is the +Sense of the Word in the Question; and what Person is _like_ to his +Lordship, the Construction put upon it in the Answer: Thus a new +_original_ Subject is started, and being suddenly _arranged_ with all +that appear _similar_ to it, is _enlighten'd_ thereby, being found to +have no _equal_ in _England_. + +However, though WIT may be _thus_ struck out, and also appears in the +_Contrast_ with great _Brilliancy_, yet the highest and most perfect +Instances of it result from the sudden and _direct Arrangement_ +together of two Objects, which hold a perspicuous and splendid +_Agreement_ with each other; It is then adorn'd with the Charms of +_Propriety_, _Clearness_ and _Illustration_; It dispels the Darkness +around an Object, and presents it diftinctly and perfectly to our +View; chearing us with its _Lustre_, and at the same time informing us +with its _Light_. + +Thus, a Gentleman was observing, that _there was_ somewhat _extremely +pleasing in an excellent_ Understanding, _when it appeared in a +beautiful_ Person; To which another returned, _It is like a fine_ +Jewel _well set_; You are here pleased with the Happiness, Propriety, +and Splendor of this _new_ Object, which finely _elucidates_ the +original Sentiment;--In short, it is the Excellence of WIT, _to +present the_ first Image _again to your mind, with new unexpected_ +Clearness _and_ Advantage. + +It is also proper to add, that there may be WIT in a _Picture_, +_Landscape_, or in any _Prospect_, where a gay unexpected _Assemblage_ +of _similar_, or _opposite_ Objects, is presented. + + JUDGMENT, is the Faculty of discerning the various _Dimensions_, + and _Differences_, of Subjects. + + INVENTION is the Faculty of finding out new _Assortments_, and + _Combinations_, of _Ideas_. + + HUMOUR is any _whimsical Oddity_ or _Foible_, appearing in the + _Temper_ or _Conduct_ of a _Person_ in _real Life_. + +This _whimsical Oddity_ of Conduct, which generally arises from the +strange _Cast_, or _Turn_ of Mind of a _queer_ Person, may also result +from _accidental_ Mistakes and Embarrassments between other Persons; +who being misled by a wrong Information and Suspicion in regard to a +Circumstance, shall act towards each other upon this Occasion, in the +same _odd whimsical_ manner, as _queer_ Persons. + +If a _Person_ in real Life, discovers any odd and remarkable +_Features_ of Temper or Conduct, I call such a Person in the _Book_ +of _Mankind_, a _Character_. So that the chief Subjects of HUMOUR are +Persons in real Life, who are _Characters_. + +It is easy to be perceived, that HUMOUR, and WIT are extremely +different. + +HUMOUR appears only in the _Foibles_ and _whimsical Conduct_ of +_Persons_ in real Life; WIT appears in _Comparisons_, either between +_Persons_ in real Life, or between _other Subjects_. + +HUMOUR is the _whimsical Oddity_, or _Foible_, which fairly appears in +its Subject, of itself; whereas WIT, is the _Lustre_ which is thrown upon +_one_ Subject, by the _sudden Introduction_ of another Subject. + +To constitute HUMOUR, there need be no more than _one_ Object +concern'd, and this must be always some _Person_ in _real Life_;-- +whereas to produce WIT, there must be always _two_ Objects _arranged_ +together, and either or both of these may be _inanimate_. + +However, though HUMOUR and WIT are thus absolutely different in +themselves, yet we frequently see them blended together. + +Thus if any _Foible_ of a _Character_ in real Life is _directly_ +attacked, by pointing out the unexpected and ridiculous _Affinity_ it +bears to some _inanimate_ Circumstances, this Foible is then ridiculed +with WIT, from the _Comparison_ which is made.--At the same time, as +the _whimsical Oddity_ of a _Character_ in real Life is the _Ground_ +of the whole, there is also _Humour_ contain'd in the Attack. + +If instead of referring the _Foible_ of a Person to any _inanimate_ +Circumstance, the _Allusion_ had been made to any other ridiculous +_Person_ in _real Life_; As a _conceited Fellow_, perpetually +recommending his own Whims, to a _Quack-Doctor_;--This _Foible_ +will then be ridiculed with HUMOUR; which is likewise the original +_Ground_: At the same Time, from the _Comparison_ which is made, there +is apparently WIT in the Description. + +So that where-ever the _Foible_ of a _Character_ in real Life is +concern'd, there HUMOUR comes in; and wherever a sprightly unexpected +_Arrangement_ is presented of two _similar_, or _opposite_ Subjects, +whether animate or inanimate, there WIT is exhibited. + +HUMOUR and WIT, as they may thus both be united in the same Subject, +may also separately appear without the least Mixture together; that +is, there may be HUMOUR without WIT, and WIT without HUMOUR. + +Thus, if in order to expose the _Foible_ of a _Character_, a _real +Person_ is introduc'd, abounding in this _Foible_, gravely persisting +in it, and valuing himself upon the Merit of it, with great Self- +sufficiency, and Disdain of others; this _Foible_ is then solely +ridiculed with HUMOUR. + +Again, if a gay unexpected _Allusion_ is made from one _inanimate_ +Object to another, or from one _Person_ in _real_ Life to another, +without any Reference to their whimsical _Oddities_ or _Foibles_; +there WIT only appears.--Various Instances of which, independent of +HUMOUR, have been already exhibited. + +A _Man_ of WIT is + he, who is happy in _elucidating_ any Subject, _by a just and + unexpected Arrangement_ and _Comparison_ of it with another + Subject. + +It may be also proper to describe a _Man_ of HUMOUR, and an HUMOURIST, +which are very different Persons. + +A _Man_ of HUMOUR is + one, who can happily exhibit a weak and ridiculous _Character_ + in real Life, either by assuming it himself, or representing + another in it, so naturally, that the _whimsical Oddities,_ and + _Foibles,_ of that _Character,_ shall be palpably expos'd. + +Whereas an HUMOURIST + is a _Person_ in real Life, obstinately attached to sensible + peculiar _Oddities_ of his own genuine Growth, which appear in + his Temper and Conduct. + +In short, a _Man_ of _Humour_ is one, who can happily exhibit and +expose the Oddities and Foibles of an _Humourist_, or of other +_Characters_. + +The _Features_ of an HUMOURIST being very remarkable and singular, +seem justly to deserve an explicit Description. It is then to be +observ'd, that an _Humourist_, at the same time that he is guided in +his Manners and Actions by his own genuine original Fancy and Temper, +disdains all _Ostentation_; excepting that alone of his _Freedom_ and +_Independency_, which he is forward of shewing upon every Occasion, +without Ceremony; he is quite superior to the _Affectation_ of a +Virtue or Accomplishment, which he thinks does not belong to him; +scorns all _Imitation_ of others; and contemns the rest of the World +for being servilely obedient to Forms and Customs; disclaiming all +such Submission himself, and regulating his Conduct in general by his +own _Conviction_, + +The _Humourist_ is forward upon many Occasions to deliver his Opinion, +in a peremptory Manner, and before he is desir'd; but he gives it +sincerely, unbiass'd by _Fear_ or _Regard_, and then leaves it to the +Persons concern'd to determine for themselves; For he is more pleas'd +in the Bottom to find his Opinion _slighted_, and to see the Conduct +of others agreeable to that System of Folly and Weakness, which he has +established with himself, to be the Course of their Actions.--To view +a rational Conduct, even in pursuance of his own Advice, would greatly +disappoint him; and be a Contradiction to this _System_ he has laid +down;--Besides it would deprive him of an Occasion of gratifying his +Spleen, with the Contempt of that Folly, which he esteems to be +natural to the rest of Mankind; For he considers himself in the World, +like a _sober_ Person in the Company of Men, who are _drunken_ or +_mad_; He may advise them to be calm, and to avoid hurting themselves, +but he does not expect they will regard his Advice; On the +contrary, he is more pleas'd with observing their _Freaks_ and +_Extravagancies_.--It is from hence that he discourages and +depreciates all who pretend to _Discretion_; Persons of this Temper +not yielding him Sport or Diversion. + +It is certain that the _Humourist_ is excessively _proud_, and yet +without knowing or suspecting it. For from the Liberty which he +frankly allows to others, of rejecting his Opinion, he is fully +persuaded, that he is free from all _Pride_; But tho' he acts in this +Circumstance without over-bearing, it has already appear'd, not to be +the Effect of his _Humility_, but of a different Motive; a Pleasure +which he takes in observing the Extravagancies of others, rather +than their Discretion. But to demonstrate his _Pride_, besides the +peremptory Manner in which he delivers his Opinion, and conducts +himself upon every Occasion, without any Deference to others, there is +this Circumstance against him; that he is the most stung by a Defeat, +upon any Topic, of all Men living; And although he disregards +Accusations of Roughness and Oddity, and rather esteems them to +be meritorious; yet he will never admit, that he has been fairly +overthrown in a Debate. + +It is odd to observe how the _Humourist_ is affected by _contemptuous_ +Treatment. An Insult of this Sort, which justly excites the +_Resentment_ of others, _terrifies_ him: It sets him upon _suspecting_ +himself, and upon doubting whether he be really that Person of +superior Sense to the rest of the World, which he has long fancied. +The Apprehension, that he actually deserves the Contempt which is put +upon him, and that he is no more than one of the common Herd, almost +distracts him; And instead of violently depreciating, or attacking +again, the Person who has contemn'd him, he will incessantly court his +Favour and good Opinion, as a Cordial he wants, though without seeming +to do so. This is a very extraordinary Weakness, and such as the +_Humourist_ would be infinitely uneasy to find ever observ'd. + +The _Humourist_, though he quickly espies, and contemns the +_Contradictions_ of others, is yet wilfully attach'd to several +himself, which he will sometimes persue through a long Course of his +own Mortification.--It may be often observ'd, that he will avoid the +Company he likes, for fear they should think he needs their Support.-- +At the same time, if he happens to fall into Company, which he tallies +not with, instead of avoiding this Company, he will continually haunt +them: For he is anxious, lest any Imputation of a Defeat should stand +out against him, and extremely sollicitous to wipe it away; Besides, +he cannot endure it should be thought that he is driven from the Pit. +--Thus, in the first Instance, his _Pride_ shall persuade him to +neglect the Company he likes; and shall force him, in the last, to +follow the Company he hates and despises. + +It is also observable that the _Humourist_, though he makes it his +Point to regulate his Conduct only by his own Conviction, will +sometimes run counter to it, merely from his Disdain of all +_Imitation_. Thus he will persist in a wrong Course, which he knows +to be such, and refuse his Compliance with an Amendment offer'd by +others, rather than endure the Appearance of being an _Imitator_. This +is a _narrow_ Side of the _Humourist_; and whenever he is turn'd upon +it, he feels great Uneasiness himself. It strikes a durable Pain +into his Breast, like the constant gnawing of a Worm; and is one +considerable Source of that Stream of Peevishnesss incident to +_Humourists_. + +Upon the same Principle of scorning all _Imitation_, the _Humourist_ +seldom heartily assents to any speculative Opinion, which is deliver'd +by another; for he is above being inform'd or set right in his +Judgment by any Person, even by a Brother _Humourist_. If two of this +_Cast_ happen to meet, instead of uniting together, they are afraid of +each other; and you shall observe _one_, in order to court the good +Opinion of the _other_, produce a Specimen of his own Perfection as an +_Humourist_; by exhibiting some unusual Strain of _sensible Oddity_, +or by unexpectedly biting a poor _Insipid_; which the other +_Humourist_ shall answer again in the same manner, in order to +display _his_ Talents. + +These are the _Foibles_ and _narrow_ Whims of a perfect _Humourist_. +But, on the other hand, he stands upon a very enlarged Basis; Is a +Lover of Reason and Liberty; and scorns to flatter or betray; nor will +he falsify his Principles, to court the Favour of the Great. He is not +credulous, or fond of Religious or Philosophical Creeds or Creed- +makers; But then he never offers himself to forge Articles of Faith +for the rest of the World. Abounding in poignant and just Reflections; +The Guardian of Freedom, and Scourge of such as do wrong. It is _He_ +checks the Frauds, and curbs the Usurpations of every Profession. The +venal Biass of the assuming Judge, the cruel Pride of the starch'd +Priest, the empty Froth of the florid Counsellor, the false Importance +of the formal Man of Business, the specious Jargon of the grave +Physician, and the creeping Taste of the trifling Connoisseur, are all +bare to his Eye, and feel the Lash of his Censure; It is _He_ that +watches the daring Strides, and secret Mines of the ambitious Prince, +and desperate Minister: _He_ gives the Alarm, and prevents their +Mischief. Others there are who have Sense and Foresight; but _they_ +are brib'd by Hopes or Fears, or bound by softer Ties; It is _He_ +only, the _Humourist_, that has the Courage and Honesty to cry out, +unmov'd by personal Resentment: He flourishes only in a Land of +_Freedom_, and when _that_ ceases he dies too, the last and noblest +_Weed_ of the Soil of _Liberty_. + +It is a palpable _Absurdity_ to suppose a Person an _Humourist_, +without excellent Sense and Abilities; as much as to suppose a _Smith_ +in his full Business, without his _Hammers_ or _Forge_.--But the +_Humourist_, as he advances in Years, is apt to grow intolerable to +himself and the World; becoming at length, uneasy, and fatigued with +the constant View of the same Follies; like a Person who is tir'd +with seeing the same Tragi-Comedy continually acted. This sowres his +Temper; And unless some favorable Incidents happen to mellow him, he +resigns himself wholly to Peevishness.--By which Time he perceives +that the World is quite tir'd of _him_.--After which he drags on the +Remainder of his Life, in a State of _War_ with the rest of Mankind. + +The _Humourist_ is constitutionally, and also from Reflection, a Man +of _Sincerity_.--If he is a _Rogue_ upon any Occasion, he is more +wilfully one, and puts greater Violence upon himself in being such, +than the rest of the World; And though he may generally seem to have +little _Benevolence_, which is the common Objection against him, +it is only for want of proper Objects; for no Person has certainly +a quicker _Feeling_; And there are Instances frequent, of greater +Generosity and humane Warmth flowing from an _Humourist_, than are +capable of proceeding from a weak _Insipid_, who labours under a +continual Flux of Civility. + +Upon the whole, the _Humourist_ is perhaps the least of all others, +a _despicable_ Character. But Imitations, which are frequently seen +of this Character, are excessively despicable.--What can be more +ridiculous, than a Wretch setting up for an _Humourist_, merely upon +the Strength of disrelishing every Thing, without any Principle;--The +Servants, Drawers, Victuals, Weather,--and growling without Poignancy +of Sense, at every new Circumstance which appears, in public or +private. A perfect and compleat _Humourist_ is rarely to be found; +and when you hear his _Voice_, is a different Creature.--In writing to +_Englishmen_, who are generally tinged, deeply or slightly, with the +_Dye_ of the _Humourist_, it seem'd not improper to insist the longer +upon this Character; However, let none be too fond of it; For though +an _Humourist_ with his Roughness is greatly to be preferr'd to a +smooth _Insipid_, yet the Extremes of both are equally wretched: +_Ideots_ being only the lowest Scale of _Insipids_, as _Madmen_ are no +other than _Humourists_ in Excess. + +It may be proper to observe in this place, that though all +_Ostentation_, _Affectation_, and _Imitation_ are excluded from the +Composition of a perfect _Humourist_; yet as they are the obvious +_Foibles_ of some Persons in Life, they may justly be made the Subject +of _Humour_. + +For HUMOUR extensively and fully understood, is _any remarkable_ +Oddity _or_ Foible _belonging to a_ Person _in_ real Life; _whether +this_ Foible _be constitutional, habitual_, or _only affected; whether +partial in one or two Circumstances; or tinging the whole Temper and +Conduct of the_ Person. + +It has from hence been observ'd, that there is more HUMOUR in the +_English_ Comedies than in others; as we have more various odd +_Characters_ in real Life, than any other Nation, or perhaps than +all other Nations together. + +That HUMOUR gives more Delight, and leaves a more pleasurable +Impression behind it, than WIT, is universally felt and established; +Though the Reasons for this have not yet been assign'd.--I shall +therefore beg Leave to submit the following. + +1. HUMOUR is more _interesting_ than WIT in general, as the _Oddities_ +and _Foibles_ of _Persons_ in _real Life_ are more apt to affect our +Passions, than any Oppositions or Relations between _inanimate_ +Objects. + +2. HUMOUR is _Nature_, or what really appears in the Subject, without +any Embellishments; WIT only a Stroke of _Art_, where the original +Subject, being insufficient of itself, is garnished and deck'd with +auxiliary Objects. + +3. HUMOUR, or the Foible of a _Character_ in real Life, is usually +insisted upon for some Length of Time. From whence, and from the +common Knowledge of the Character, it is universally felt and +understood.--Whereas the Strokes of WIT are like sudden _Flashes_, +vanishing in an Instant, and usually flying too fast to be +sufficiently marked and pursued by the Audience. + +4. HUMOUR, if the Representation of it be just, is compleat and +perfect in its Kind, and entirely fair and unstrain'd.--Whereas in the +Allusions of WIT, the Affinity is generally imperfect and defective in +one Part or other; and even in those Points where the Affinity may be +allow'd to subsist, some Nicety and Strain is usually requir'd to make +it appear. + +5. HUMOUR generally appears in such Foibles, as each of the Company +thinks himself superior to.--Whereas WIT shews the Quickness and +Abilities of the Person who discovers it, and places him superior +to the rest of the Company. + +6. Humour, in the Representation of the _Foibles_ of _Persons_ in +_real Life_, frequently exhibits very _generous benevolent_ Sentiments +of the Heart; And these, tho' exerted in a particular odd Manner, +justly command our Fondness and Love.--Whereas in the Allusions of WIT, +_Severity_, _Bitterness_, and _Satire_, are frequently exhibited.--And +where these are avoided, not worthy amiable Sentiments of the _Heart_, +but quick unexpected Efforts of the _Fancy_, are presented. + +7. The odd Adventures, and Embarrassments, which _Persons_ in _real +Life_ are drawn into by their _Foibles_, are fit Subjects of _Mirth_. +--Whereas in pure WIT, the Allusions are rather _surprizing_, than +_mirthful_; and the _Agreements_ or _Contrasts_ which are started +between Objects, without any relation to the _Foibles_ of _Persons_ +in real Life, are more fit to be _admired_ for their _Happiness_ and +_Propriety_, than to excite our _Laughter_.--Besides, WIT, in the +frequent Repetition of it, tires the Imagination with its precipitate +Sallies and Flights; and teizes the Judgment.--Whereas HUMOUR, in the +Representation of it, puts no Fatigue upon the _Imagination_, and +gives exquisite Pleasure to the _Judgment_. + +These seem to me to be the different Powers and Effects of HUMOUR and +WIT. However, the most agreeable Representations or Competitions of +all others, appear not where they _separately_ exist, but where they +are _united_ together in the same Fabric; where HUMOUR is the _Ground- +work_ and chief Substance, and WIT happily spread, _quickens_ the +whole with Embellishments. + +This is the Excellency of the _Character_ of Sir _John Falstaff_; +the _Ground-work_ is _Humour_, the Representation and Detection of +a bragging and vaunting _Coward_ in _real Life_; However, this alone +would only have expos'd the _Knight_, as a meer _Noll Bluff_, to the +Derision of the Company; And after they had once been gratify'd with +his Chastisement, he would have sunk into Infamy, and become quite +odious and intolerable: But here the inimitable _Wit_ of Sir _John_ +comes in to his Support, and gives a new _Rise_ and _Lustre_ to his +Character; For the sake of his _Wit_ you forgive his _Cowardice_; or +rather, are fond of his _Cowardice_ for the Occasions it gives to his +_Wit_. In short, the _Humour_ furnishes a Subject and Spur to the +_Wit_, and the _Wit_ again supports and embellishes the _Humour_. + +At the _first_ Entrance of the _Knight_, your good Humour and Tendency +to _Mirth_ are irresistibly excited by his jolly Appearance and +Corpulency; you feel and acknowledge him, to be the fittest Subject +imaginable for yielding _Diversion_ and _Merriment_; but when you +see him immediately set up for _Enterprize_ and _Activity_, with his +evident _Weight_ and _Unweildiness_, your Attention is all call'd +forth, and you are eager to watch him to the End of his Adventures; +Your Imagination pointing out with a full Scope his future +Embarrassments. All the while as you accompany him forwards, he +_heightens_ your Relish for his future Disasters, by his happy Opinion +of his own Sufficiency, and the gay Vaunts which he makes of his +Talents and Accomplishments; so that at last when he falls into a +Scrape, your Expectation is exquisitely gratify'd, and you have the +full Pleasure of seeing all his trumpeted Honour laid in the Dust. +When in the midst of his Misfortunes, instead of being utterly +demolish'd and sunk, he rises again by the superior Force of his +_Wit_, and begins a _new_ Course with fresh Spirit and Alacrity; +This excites you the more to _renew_ the Chace, in full View of his +_second_ Defeat; out of which he recovers again, and triumphs with +new Pretensions and Boastings. After this he immediately starts upon +a _third_ Race, and so on; continually detected and caught, and +yet constantly extricating himself by his inimitable _Wit_ and +_Invention_; thus yielding a perpetual _Round_ of Sport and Diversion. + +Again, the genteel _Quality_ of Sir _John_ is of great Use in +supporting his Character; It prevents his _sinking_ too low after +several of his Misfortunes; Besides, you allow him, in consequence of +his _Rank_ and _Seniority_, the Privilege to dictate, and take the +Lead, and to rebuke others upon many Occasions; By this he is sav'd +from appearing too _nauseous_ and _impudent_. The good _Sense_ +which he possesses comes also to his Aid, and saves him from being +_despicable_, by forcing your Esteem for his real Abilities.--Again, +the _Privilege_ you allow him of rebuking and checking others, when he +assumes it with proper Firmness and Superiority, helps to _settle_ +anew, and _compose_ his Character after an Embarrassment; And reduces +in some measure the _Spirit_ of the Company to a proper _Level_, +before he sets out again upon a fresh Adventure;--without this, they +would be kept continually _strain'd_, and _wound up_ to the highest +Pitch, without sufficient Relief and Diversity. + +It may also deserve to be remark'd of _Falstaff_, that the _Figure_ +of his _Person_ is admirably suited to the _Turn_ of his _Mind_; so +that there arises before you a perpetual _Allusion_ from one to the +other, which forms an incessant Series of _Wit_, whether they are in +_Contrast_ or _Agreement_ together.--When he pretends to _Activity_, +there is _Wit_ in the _Contrast_ between his _Mind_ and his _Person_, +--And _Wit_ in their _Agreement_, when he triumphs in _Jollity_. + +To compleat the whole,--you have in this Character of _Falstaff_, +not only a free Course of _Humour_, supported and embellish'd with +admirable _Wit_; but this _Humour_ is of a Species the most _jovial_ +and _gay_ in all Nature.--Sir _Jobn Falstaff_ possesses Generosity, +Chearfulness, Alacrity, Invention, Frolic and Fancy superior to all +other Men;--The _Figure_ of his _Person_ is the Picture of Jollity, +Mirth, and Good-nature, and banishes at once all other Ideas from your +Breast; He is happy himself, and makes you happy.--If you examine him +further, he has no Fierceness, Reserve, Malice or Peevishness lurking +in his Heart; His Intentions are all pointed at innocent Riot and +Merriment; Nor has the Knight any inveterate Design, except against +_Sack_, and that too he _loves_.--If, besides this, he desires to +pass for a Man of _Activity_ and _Valour_, you can easily excuse so +harmless a _Foible_, which yields you the highest Pleasure in its +constant _Detection_. + +If you put all these together, it is impossible to _hate_ honest +_Jack Falstaff_; If you observe them again, it is impossible to avoid +_loving_ him; He is the gay, the witty, the frolicksome, happy, and +fat _Jack Falstaff_, the most delightful _Swaggerer_ in all Nature.-- +You must _love_ him for your _own_ sake,--At the same time you cannot +but _love_ him for _his own_ Talents; And when you have _enjoy'd_ +them, you cannot but _love_ him in _Gratitude_;--He has nothing to +disgust you, and every thing to give you Joy;--His _Sense_ and his +_Foibles_ are equally directed to advance your Pleasure; And it is +impossible to be tired or unhappy in his Company. + +This _jovial_ and _gay_ Humour, without any thing _envious_, +_malicious_, _mischievous_, or _despicable_, and continually +_quicken'd_ and adorn'd with _Wit_, yields that peculiar Delight, +without any _Alloy_, which we all feel and acknowledge in _Falstaff's_ +Company.--_Ben Johnson_ has _Humour_ in his _Characters_, drawn with +the most masterly Skill and Judgment; In Accuracy, Depth, Propriety, +and Truth, he has no _Superior_ or _Equal_ amongst _Ancients_ or +_Moderns_; But the _Characters_ he exhibits are of _satirical_, and +_deceitful_, or of a _peevish_ or _despicable_ Species; as _Volpone_, +_Subtle_, _Morose_, and _Abel Drugger_; In all of which there is +something very justly to be _hated_ or _despised_; And you feel +the same Sentiments of _Dislike_ for every other _Character_ of +_Johnson_'s; so that after you have been _gratify'd_ with their +_Detention_ and _Punishment_, you are quite tired and disgusted with +their Company:--Whereas _Shakespear_, besides the peculiar _Gaiety_ in +the _Humour_ of _Falstaff_, has guarded him from disgusting you with +his _forward Advances_, by giving him _Rank_ and _Quality_; from being +_despicable_ by his real good _Sense_ and excellent _Abilities_; from +being _odious_ by his _harmless Plots_ and _Designs_; and from being +_tiresome_ by his inimitable Wit, and his new and incessant _Sallies_ +of highest _Fancy_ and _Frolick_. + +This discovers the _Secret_ of carrying COMEDY to the highest Pitch of +Delight; Which lies + in drawing the Persons exhibited, with such chearful and amiable + _Oddities_ and _Foibles_, as you would chuse in your own + _Companions_ in _real Life; +--otherwise, tho' you may be diverted at first with the _Novelty_ of a +Character, and with a proper _Detection_ and _Ridicule_ of it, yet its +_Peevishness_, _Meanness_, or _Immorality_, will begin to disgust you +after a little Reflection, and become soon _tiresome_ and _odious_; It +being certain, that + whoever cannot be endured as an _accidental_ Companion in _real + Life_, will never become, for the very same Reasons, a _favorite + comic Character_ in the Theatre. + +This _Relish_ for _generous_ and _worthy_ Characters alone, which +we all feel upon the _Theatre_, where no Biass of Envy, Malice, or +personal Resentment draws us aside, seems to be some Evidence of our +_natural_ and _genuin_ Disposition to _Probity_ and _Virtue_; tho' the +Minds of most Persons being early and deeply _tinged_ with vicious +Passions, it is no wonder that _Stains_ have been generally mistaken +for _original Colours_. + +It may be added, that _Humour_ is the most exquisite and delightful, +when the _Oddities_ and _Foibles_ introduc'd are not _mischievous_ or +_sneaking_, but _free_, _jocund_, and _liberal_; and such as result +from a generous Flow of Spirits, and a warm universal _Benevolence_. + +It is obviously from hence, that the _Character_ of Sir _Roger_ de +_Coverly_ in the _Spectators_ is so extremely agreeable. His _Foibles_ +are all derived from some amiable Cause.--If he believes that _one +Englishman_ can conquer _two Frenchmen_, you laugh at his _Foible_, +and are fond of a _Weakness_ in the Knight, which proceeds from his +high Esteem of his _own Country-men_.--If he chuses you should employ +a _Waterman_ or _Porter_ with _one_ Leg, you readily excuse the +Inconvenience he puts you to, for his worthy regard to the Suffering +of a brave _Soldier_.--In short, though he is guilty of continual +Absurdities, and has little Understanding or real Abilities, you +cannot but _love_ and _esteem_ him, for his _Honour_, _Hospitality_, +and universal _Benevolence_. + +It is indeed true, that his _Dignity_, _Age_, and _Rank_ in his +Country, are of constant Service in _upholding_ his Character. +These are a perpetual _Guard_ to the Knight, and preserve him from +_Contempt_ upon many Occasions.--All which corresponds entirely with +the fore-going _Remark_. For you would be fond of Sir _Roger's_ +Acquaintaince and Company in _real Life_, as he is a Gentleman of +_Quality_ and _Virtue_; You love and admire him in the _Spectators_ +for the _same_ Reasons; And for these also he would become, if he was +rightly exhibited, a _favorite_ Character in the _Theatre_. + +It may be proper to observe in this Place, that the _Business_ +of COMEDY is to exhibit the whimsical _unmischievous Oddities_, +_Frolics,_ and _Foibles_ of _Persons_ in _real Life_; And also to +_expose_ and _ridicule_ their _real Follies_, _Meanness_, and _Vices_. +The _former_, it appears, is more pleasurable to the Audience, but the +_latter_ has the Merit of being more instructive. + +The _Business_ of TRAGEDY is to exhibit the _Instability_ of _human_ +Grandeur, and the unexpected _Misfortunes_ and _Distresses_ incident +to the _Innocent_ and _Worthy_ in all Stations.--And also to shew the +terrible Sallies and the miserable Issue and Punishment of ungovern'd +Passions and Wickedness.--The _former_ softens the Heart and fills it +with Compassion, Humility and Benevolence.--Compositions of this Sort +are the highest, most admirable, and useful in all Nature, when they +are finish'd with Propriety and Delicacy, and justly wrought up +with the Sublime and Simplicity.--The _latter_ Species of _Tragedy_ +terrifies and shocks us, in exhibiting both the Crimes and the +Punishments. It threatens us into Moderation and Justice, by shewing +the terrible Issue of their Contraries. Pieces of this Sort, conducted +with Propriety, and carrying Application to ourselves, can scarcely be +desireable; But as they are generally conducted, they amount only to +giving us an absurd Representation of a Murther committed by some +furious foaming _Basha_, or _Sultan_. + +To return.--_Johnson_ in his COMIC Scenes has expos'd and ridicul'd +_Folly_ and _Vice_; _Shakespear_ has usher'd in _Joy_, _Frolic_ and +_Happiness_.--The _Alchymist_, _Volpone_ and _Silent Woman_ of +_Johnson_, are most exquisite _Satires_. The _comic_ Entertainments of +_Shakespear_ are the highest Compositions of _Raillery_, _Wit_ +and _Humour_. _Johnson_ conveys some Lesson in every Character. +_Shakespear_ some new Species of Foible and Oddity. The one pointed +his Satire with masterly Skill; the other was inimitable in touching +the Strings of Delight. With _Johnson_ you are confin'd and +instructed, with _Shakespear_ unbent and dissolv'd in Joy. _Johnson_ +excellently concerts his Plots, and all his Characters unite in the +one Design. _Shakespear_ is superior to such Aid or Restraint; His +Characters continually sallying from one independent Scene to another, +and charming you in each with fresh Wit and Humour. + +It may be further remark'd, that _Johnson_ by pursuing the most useful +Intention of _Comedy_, is in Justice oblig'd to _hunt down_ and +_demolish_ his own Characters. Upon this Plan he must necessarily +expose them to your _Hatred_, and of course can never bring out an +amiable Person. His _Subtle_, and _Face_ are detected at last, and +become mean and despicable. Sir _Epicure Mammon_ is properly trick'd, +and goes off ridiculous and detestable. The _Puritan Elders_ suffer +for their Lust of Money, and are quite nauseous and abominable; And +his _Morose_ meets with a severe Punishment, after having sufficiently +tir'd you with his Peevishness.--But _Shakespear_, with happier +Insight, always supports his Characters in your _Favour_. His Justice +_Shallow_ withdraws before he is tedious; The _French_ Doctor, and +_Welch_ Parson, go off in full Vigour and Spirit; Ancient _Pistoll_ +indeed is scurvily treated; however, he keeps up his Spirits, and +continues to threaten so well, that you are still desirous of his +Company; and it is impossible to be tir'd or dull with the gay +unfading Evergreen _Falstaff_. + +But in remarking upon the Characters of _Johnson_, it would be unjust +to pass _Abel Drugger_ without notice; This is a little, mean, +sneaking, sordid Citizen, hearkening to a Couple of Sharpers, who +promise to make him rich; they can scarcely prevail upon him to resign +the least Tittle he possesses, though he is assur'd, it is in order to +get more; and your Diversion arises, from seeing him _wrung_ between +_Greediness_ to _get_ Money, and _Reluctance_ to _part_ with any for +that Purpose. His Covetousness continually prompts him to follow the +Conjurer, and puts him at the same Time upon endeavouring to stop his +Fees. All the while he is excellently managed, and spirited on +by _Face_. However, this Character upon the whole is _mean_ and +_despicable_, without any of that free spirituous jocund Humour +abounding in _Shakespear_. But having been strangely exhibited upon +the Theatre, a few Years ago, with odd Grimaces and extravagant +Gestures, it has been raised into more Attention than it justly +deserved; It is however to be acknowledg'd, that _Abel_ has no +Hatred, Malice or Immorality, nor any assuming Arrogance, Pertness +or Peevishness; And his eager Desire of getting and saving Money, by +Methods he thinks lawful, are excusable in a Person of his Business; +He is therefore not odious or detestable, but harmless and inoffensive +in private Life; and from thence, correspondent with the Rule already +laid down, he is the most capable of any of _Johnson_'s Characters, of +being a Favourite on the Theatre. + +It appears, that in Imagination, Invention, Jollity and gay Humour, +_Johnson_ had little Power; But _Shakespear_ unlimited Dominion. The +first was cautious and strict, not daring to sally beyond the Bounds +of Regularity. The other bold and impetuous, rejoicing like a Giant to +run his Course, through all the Mountains and Wilds of Nature and +Fancy. + +It requires an almost painful Attention to mark the Propriety and +Accuracy of _Johnson_, and your Satisfaction arises from Reflection +and Comparison; But the Fire and Invention of _Shakespear_ in an +Instant are shot into your Soul, and enlighten and chear the most +indolent Mind with their own Spirit and Lustre.--Upon the whole, +_Johnson_'s Compositions are like finished Cabinets, where every +Part is wrought up with the most excellent Skill and Exactness;-- +_Shakespear_'s like magnificent Castles, not perfectly finished or +regular, but adorn'd with such bold and magnificent Designs, as at +once delight and astonish you with their Beauty and Grandeur. + + + RAILLERY is a genteel poignant Attack of a _Person_ upon any + _slight Foibles_, _Oddities_, or _Embarrassments_ of his, in + which he is tender, or may be supposed to be tender, and + unwilling to come to a free Explanation. + + SATIRE is a witty and severe Attack of _mischievous Habits_ or + _Vices_; + + RIDICULE is a free _Attack_ of any _Motly Composition_, wherein a + real or affected _Excellence_ and _Defect_ both jointly appear, + _glaring_ together, and _mocking_ each other, in the same + _Subject_. + +Hence the Aim of _Raillery_, is to please you, by some little +_Embarrassment_ of a _Person_; Of _Satire_, to scourge _Vice_, and +to deliver it up to your just _Detestation_; And of _Ridicule_, to +set an Object in a mean ludicrous Light, so as to expose it to your +_Derision_ and _Contempt_. + +It appears therefore that _Raillery_ and _Ridicule_ differ in several +Circumstances. + +1. _Raillery_ can only be employ'd in relation to _Persons_, but +_Ridicule_ may be employ'd in what relates either to _Persons_, or +other _Objects_. + +2. _Raillery_ is us'd only upon _slight_ Subjects, where no real +Abilities or Merit are questioned, in order to avoid degrading the +Person you attack, or rendering him contemptible; Whereas _Ridicule_ +observes no such Decency, but endeavours really to degrade the Person +attack'd, and to render him contemptible. + +3. _Raillery_ may be pointed at a whimsical Circumstance, only because +a Person is known to be tender upon it; and your Pleasure will arise +from the _Embarrassment_ he suffers, in being put to an Explanation;-- +Thus a young Gentleman may be _rallied_ upon his Passion for a Lady;-- +At the same Time there may be no Ground for _Ridicule_ in this +Circumstance, as it may no way deserve your _Derision_ or _Contempt_. + +4. As it thus appears that there are Subjects of _Raillery_, into +which _Ridicule_ cannot justly be admitted; So there are Subjects +of _Ridicule_, wherein your Derision and Contempt are so strongly +excited, that they are too gross for _Raillery_;--As a person tossed +in a Blanket; or the unfortunate Attack which another has made upon a +Windmill. + +5. In short, _Raillery_, if the Adventures it is turn'd upon are +too _gross_ and _luscious_, becomes _Ridicule_; And therefore, in +Comparison together, _Raillery_ appears like _Wine_ of a thin Body, +and delicate poignant Flavour; _Ridicule_, like a _Wine_ which is +fuller, and more rich, and luscious. + +_Quixote_ is a Character, wherein _Humour_ and _Ridicule_ are finely +interwoven;--It is not a Subject of _Satire_, as the Knight is free +from all Badness of Heart, and Immorality; Nor properly of _Raillery_, +his Adventures in general being too _gross_ and _disastrous_;-- The +_Humour_ appears, in the Representation of a Person in real Life, +fancying himself to be, under the most solemn Obligations to attempt +_hardy_ Atchievements; and upon this Whimsy immediately pursuing the +most romantic Adventures, with great Gravity, Importance, and Self- +sufficiency; To heighten your Mirth, the _hardy_ Atchievements to be +accomplish'd by this Hero, are wittily contrasted by his own +meagre weak Figure, and the _desperate Unfierceness_ of his Steed +_Rozinante_;--The _Ridicule_ appears in the strange Absurdity of the +Attempts, upon which the Knight chuses to exercise his Prowess; Its +Poignancy is highly quicken'd, and consequently the Pleasure it gives +you, by his miserable Disasters, and the doleful Mortifications of all +his Importance and Dignity;--But here, after the Knight, by diverting +you in this manner, has brought himself down to the lowest Mark, he +rises again and forces your Esteem, by his excellent Sense, Learning +and Judgment, upon any Subjects which are not ally'd to his Errantry; +These continually act for the Advancement of his Character; And with +such Supports and Abilities he always obtains your ready Attention, +and never becomes heavy or tedious. + +To these you are to add the perfect _good Breeding_ and _Civility_ of +the Knight upon every Occasion; which are some Kind of Merit in his +Favour, and entitle him to Respect, by the Rules of common Gentility +and Decency; At the same time his Courage, his Honour, Generosity, +and Humanity, are conspicuous in every Act and Attempt; The _Foibles_ +which he possesses, besides giving you exquisite Pleasure, are wholly +inspir'd by these worthy Principles; Nor is there any thing base, or +detestable, in all his Temper or Conduct; It was from hence that the +DUKE and the DUTCHESS were extremely delighted with his Visit at their +_Castle_; And you yourself, if he existed in real Life, would be fond +of his Company at your own Table; which proves him, upon the whole, to +be an amiable Character;--It is therefore no wonder that Signior _Don +Quixote of la Mancha_ has been so courteously receiv'd in every +Country of _Europe_. + +Thus delightfully wrought, as this History is, with _Humour_ and +_Ridicule_, yet _Cervantes_, still fearful of tiring you with too much +of the _Errantry_, has introduc'd the most charming Variety of other +Adventures; --All along in the pacific Intervals, you are inform'd of +the private Occurrences between the Knight and his 'Squire; And from +these, where it is least to be expected, you are surpriz'd with the +most high and delicious Repast;-- Nothing can be more pregnant with +Mirth, than the Opposition continually working between the grave +Solemnity and Dignity of _Quixote_, and the arch Ribaldry and Meanness +of _Sancho_; And the Contrast can never be sufficiently admir'd, +between the _excellent fine Sense_ of the ONE, and the _dangerous +common Sense_ of the OTHER. + +It is here that the Genius and Power of _Cervantes_ is most admirably +shewn; He was the greatest Master that ever appear'd, in finely +opposing, and contrasting his Characters. It is from hence that you +feel a Poignancy and Relish in his Writings, which is not to be met +with in any others; The natural Reflexions and Debates of _Quixote_ +and _Sancho_ would have been barren, insipid, and trite, under other +Management; But _Cervantes_, by his excellent Skill in the _Contrast_, +has from these drawn a Regale, which for high, quick, racy Flavour, +and Spirit, has yet never been equall'd. + +It may here be enquir'd, What Species of Composition or Character is +the most pleasurable, and mirthful, in all Nature?--In _Falstaff_, +you have _Humour_ embelish'd with _Wit_; In _Quixote_, _Humour_ made +poignant with _Ridicule_; And it is certain that _Humour_ must always +be the Ground-work of such Subjects, no Oddities in inanimate Objects +being capable of interesting our Passions so strongly, as the Foibles +of Persons in real Life;--The chief Substance of _Johnson_'s +Compositions is _Humour_ and _Satire_; upon which Plan, as hath been +already observ'd, he is oblig'd to demolish, and render detestable, +his own Characters;--_Humour_ and _Raillery_ are also capable +of furnishing a Repast of quick Relish and Flavour; In written +Compositions, the Attack of the _Raillery_, as well as the Reception +of it, may be happily conducted, which in other accidental Encounters +are liable to Hazard; All Peevishness or Offence is thus easily +avoided, and the Character attack'd is sav'd from being really +contemptible;--But then indeed the Pleasure you are to receive +generally depends upon the Confusion of the Person attack'd, without +there being in reason a sufficient Cause for this Confusion;--It is +for want of this just Foundation, that the Pleasure arising from +_Raillery_ is apt to come forth with less Freedom, Fulness, and +Conviction, though with more Delicacy, than that which is derived +from _Wit_, or _Ridicule_;--However, _Humour_ and _Raillery_ united +together, when the _Raillery_ is founded upon some _real_ +Embarrassment in the Circumstance, as well as in the Confusion of the +Person attack'd, will furnish a very high Entertainment; which has +Pretensions to rival either _Humour_ and _Wit_, or _Humour_ and +_Ridicule_. + +To give an Instance of _Humour_ and _Raillery_, I shall insert +_Horace_'s famous Description of his Embarrassment with an impertinent +Fellow. This indeed is entitl'd, in almost all the Editions of +_Horace_, a _Satire_, but very improperly, as the Subject is not +_Vice_ or _Immorality_; + + Ibam forte via sacra, sicut meus est mos, + Nescio quid meditans nugarum, at totus in illis: + Accurrit quidam notus mihi nomine tantum; + Arreptaque manu, Quid agis, dulcissime rerum? + Suaviter, ut nunc est, inquam: & cupio omnia quae vis. + Cum affectaretur, Num quid vis? occupo. At ille, + Noris nos, inquit; docti sumus. Hic ego: Pluris + Hoc, inquam, mihi eris. Misere discedere quaerens, + Ire modo ocyus, interdum consistere: in aurem + Dicere nescio quid puero: cum sudor ad imos + Manaret talos. O te, Bollane, cerebri + Felicem: aiebam tacitus! Cum quidlibet ille + Garriret, vicos, urbem laudaret; ut illi + Nil respondebam: Misere cupis, inquit abire. + Jamdudum video: sed nil agis: usque tenebo: + Persequar: hinc quo nunc iter est tibi? Nil opus est te + Circumagi: quemdam volo visere, non tibi notum: + Trans Tiberim longe cubat is, prope Caesaris hortos. + Nil habeo quod agam, & non sum piger: usque sequar te, + Demitto auriculas ut iniquae mentis asellus, + Cum gravius dorso subiit onus. Incipit ille: + Si bene me novi, non Viscum pluris amicum, + Non Varium facies; nam quis me scribere plures + Aut citius possit versus? quis membra movere + Mollius? invideat quod & Hermogenes, ego canto. + Interpellandi locus hic erat: Est tibi mater, + Cognati, queis te salvo est opus? Haud mihi quisquam: + Omnes composui. Felices! nunc ego resto: + Confice: namque instat fatum mihi triste, Sabella + Quod puero cecinit divina mota anus urna, + Hunc neque dira venena, nec hosticus auferret ensis, + Nec laterum dolor, aut tussis, nec tarda podagra; + Garrulus hunc quando consumet cumque loquaces. + Si sapiat, vitet, simul atque adoleverit aetas. + Ventum erat ad Vestae, quarta jam parte diei + Praeterita; & casu tunc respondere vadato + Debebat: quod ni fecisset, perdere litem. + Si me amas, inquit, paulum hic ades. Inteream, si + Aut valeo stare, aut novi civilia jura: + Et propero quo scis. Dubius sum quid faciam, inquit; + Tene relinquam, an rem. Me, sodes. Non faciam, ille; + Et praecedere coepit. Ego, ut contendere durum est + Cum victore, sequor. Mecaenas quomodo tecum? + Hinc repetit. Paucorum hominum, & mentis bene sanae. + Nemo dexterius fortuna est usus. Haberes + Magnum adjutorem, posset qui ferre secundas, + Hunc hominem velles si tradere: dispeream, ni + Summosses omnes. Non isto vivimus illic + Quo tu rere modo, domus hac nec purior ulla est, + Nec magis his aliena malis: nil mi officit unquam, + Ditior hic, aut est quia doctior: est locus uni + Cuique suus. Magnum narras, vix credibile. Atqui + Sic habet. Accendis, quare cupiam magis illi + Proximus esse. Veils tantummodo: quae tua virtus, + Expugnabis; & est qui vinci possit: eoque + Difficiles aditus primos habet. Haud mihi deero, + Muneribus servos corrumpam: non, hodie si + Exclusus fuero, desistam: tempera quaeram: + Occurram in triviis: deducam. Nil sine magno + Vita labore dedit mortalibus. Haec dum agit, ecce + Fuscus Aristius occurrit mihi carus, & illum + Qui pulchre nosset. Consistimus. Unde venis? & + Quo tendis? rogat, & respondet. Vellere coepi, + Et prensare manu lentissima brachia, nutans, + Distorquens oculos, ut me eriperet. Male salsus + Ridens dissimulare: mecum jecur urere bilis. + Certe nescio quid secreto velle loqui te + Aiebas mecum. Memini bene; sed meliori + Tempora dicam: hodie tricesima sabbata, vin'tu + Curtis Judaeis oppedere? Nulla mihi, inquam, + Religio est. At mi, sum paulo infirmior; unus + Multorum ignosces; alias loquar. Hunccine solem + Tam nigrum surrexe mihi: Fugit improbus, ac me + Sub cultro linquit. Casu venit obvius illi + Adversarius; &, Quo tu turpissime! magna + Inclamat voce; &, Licet antestari? Ego vero + Oppono auriculam; rapit in jus. Clamor utrinque + Undique concursus. Sic me servavit _Apollo_. + +[Transcriber's Note: +See end of _Essay_ for translation information.] + +The Intention of _Horace_ in this Piece, is to expose an _impertinent_ +Fellow, and to give a ludicrous Detail of his own _Embarrassment_; +Your Pleasure arises from the View which he gives you of his own +Mortification, whereby he lays himself fairly open to your _Raillery_; +This is the more poignant, and quick, from the real Distress which you +see he endur'd, in this odd Attack; At the same Time the particular Turn +of the Fellow, who chose in this Manner to pin himself upon another, is +a very odd Species of impertinent _Humour_.--This Piece, as it stands, +irresistibly forces your Mirth, and shakes you with Laughter; But to +a Person of Discernment, it is chiefly at _Horace_'s Expence; Who in +receiving and enduring such insolent Treatment, appears in a Light too +low and ridiculous, though he has thought fit himself to exhibit the +Scene again for the Diversion of the Public; + +The + Misere, cupis, ---- abire, + Jamdudum video, sed nil agis, usque tenebo, + Persequar;-- + +was an absolute Insult; And very unfit to be related by the Person +who suffer'd it, as a Matter of Merriment;--Besides this Tameness +of _Horace_, the Impudence of the Fellow is excessively nauseous and +disgusting at the Bottom, though the whole carries a Froth of _Raillery_ +and _Humour_ upon the Surface. + +The Truth is, that this Piece, as it stands, would have properly +proceeded from another Person, who had intended to expose the +Impertinence and Impudence of the Fellow, and freely to _rally_ poor +_Horace_, with some Mixture of _Ridicule_, upon his unfortunate +Embarrassment; upon this Basis it will appear with Propriety; Without +which all Compositions of _Wit_, or _Humour_, or _Taste_, tho' at +first they may pleasurably strike the Fancy or Sight, are at last +disgusting to the Judgment. + +Having here occasionally offer'd some Remarks upon this Composition, +as it now stands, it may be proper to point out the Manner in which +the _Humour_ and _Raillery_ of such an Embarrassment, might have been +carried to the highest Pitch; And the Description of it have been +given by _Horace_ himself, without any Diminution of his own Gentility +or Importance;--Imagine then that he had been join'd in his Walk by a +weak, ignorant Person, of Good-nature, and the utmost Civility; one +who fancy'd himself possessed of the greatest Talents, and fully +persuaded that he gave all he convers'd with a particular Pleasure;-- +Upon such an Attack, no Resentment or Anger could have been decently +shewn by _Horace_, As the Person thus pestering him, was all the while +intending the highest Compliment; And must therefore be received, and +attended to, with perfect Complaisance; The _Humour_ of this Person +would have been very entertaining, in the strange Conceit which he +held of his own Abilities, and of the paticular Pleasure he was +granting to _Horace_, in condescending to give him so much of his +Company; In these Sentiments he should regard all _Horace_'s Excuses, +Endeavours, and Struggles to be gone, as Expressions of his Sense of +the Honour done him; which should be an Argument with this Person for +obstinately persisting to honour him still further; All the while he +must be supported by some _real Importance_ belonging to him, attended +with _good Breeding_, and strengthened by such occasional Instances +of _Sense_, as may secure him from being trampled upon, or becoming +absolutely contemptible; In such an Adventure the Mortification, and +Distress of _Horace_, would be excessively whimsical and severe; +especially as he would be depriv'd of all Succour and Relief; being in +Decency oblig'd, not only to suppress all Anger or Uneasiness, but, +what is exquisitely quick, to receive this whole Treatment with the +utmost Complacency; An _Embarrassment_ of this sort, finely described, +would have yielded the greatest Pleasure to the Reader, and carried +the _Raillery_ upon _Horace_, without hurting or degrading him, to the +highest Degree of _Poignancy_; And from hence may be conceiv'd, what +delightful Entertainments are capable of being drawn from _Humour_ and +_Raillery_. + +It is also easy to apprehend, that the several Subjects of _Wit_, +_Humour_, _Raillery_, _Satire_, and _Ridicule_, appear not only +_singly_ upon many Occasions, or _two_ of them combined together, +but are also frequently united in other Combinations, which are +more _complicate_; An Instance of the Union together of _Humour_, +_Raillery_, and _Ridicule_, I remember to have read somewhere +in _Voiture_'s Letters; He is in _Spain_, and upon the Point of +proceeding from thence to some other Place in an _English_ Vessel; +After he has written this Account of himself to a Lady at _Paris_, +he proceeds in his Letter to this Purpose; + + "You may perhaps apprehend, that I shall be in some Danger this + Voyage, of falling into the Hands of a _Barbary_ Corsair; But to + relieve you from all such Fears, I shall beg Leave to tell you, + what my honest Captain has inform'd me himself, for my own + Satisfaction; He suspected, it seems, that I might have some + Uneasiness upon this Head; and has therefore privately assured + me, that I have no need to be afraid of being taken with him; for + that whenever it is likely to come to this, he will infallibly + blow up the Ship with his own Hands;--After this, I presume, you + will be perfectly easy, that I am in no Danger of going to + _Sallee_;" + +This is exquisitely _rich_; The brave and odd Fancy of the _English_ +Captain, in finding out for himself, and _privately_ communicating to +_Voiture_, this Method of Security from Slavery, abounds with the +highest _Humour_; At the same time the honest Tar, as a _Projecter_, +is excessively open to _Ridicule_, for his Scheme to blow them all +up, in order to prevent their being taken Prisoners; There is besides +these, a very full _Raillery_, which _Voiture_ here opens upon +_himself_; For as this Adventure, which he is going to be engaged in, +has been attended, as yet, with no Mischief; nor is certain to be so, +the whole is to be consider'd, at present, as only a slight Scrape; +especially as he exhibits it in this manner himself, and invites you +to make it the Object of your Pleasure, and _Raillery_;--It may also +be observ'd, that the _Humour_ in this Subject, which flows from the +_Captain_, is adorn'd with a very peculiar, and pleasing _Propriety_; +As it is not barely a _Whim_, or the Result of an _odd Sourness_ or +_queer Pride_, but the Effect of his _Courage_, and of that Freedom +from all Terror at Death, which is perfectly amiable in his Character. + +There are other Combinations of _Wit_, _Humour_, _Raillery_, _Satire_, +and _Ridicule_, where _four_ of them, or all _five_, are united in +one Subject;--Like various _Notes_ in _Music_, sounding together, and +jointly composing one exquisite Piece of Harmony;--Or like different +_Rays_ of _Light_, shining together in one _Rainbow_: It is pleasant +to _divide_ these _Combinations_, and to view as with a _Prism_, the +different Rays united in each; of which _Humour_, like the _Red_, is +eminent for its superior Force and Excellence;--When the Judgment is +thus capable of parting, and easily assigning the several Quantities, +and Proportions of each, it heightens our Pleasure, and gives us an +absolute Command over the Subject; But they are often so intimately +mix'd, and blended together, that it is difficult to separate them +clearly, tho' they are all certainly felt in the same Piece;--Like +the different _Flavours_ of rich _Fruits_, which are inseparably +mix'd, yet all perfectly tasted, in one _Pine-Apple_. + +_Raillery_, and _Satire_, are extremely different; + +1. _Raillery_, is a genteel poignant Attack of _slight_ Foibles and +Oddities; _Satire_ a witty and severe Attack of _mischievous_ Habits +and Vices. + +2. The _Intention_ of _Raillery_, is to procure your _Pleasure_, by +exposing the little Embarrassment of a Person; But the _Intention_ +of _Satire_, is to raise your _Detestation_, by exposing the real +Deformity of his Vices. + +3. If in _Raillery_ the Sting be given too deep and severe, it +will sink into Malice and Rudeness, And your Pleasure will not be +justifiable; But _Satire_, the more deep and severe the Sting of it +is, will be the more excellent; Its Intention being entirely to root +out and destroy the Vice. + +4. It is a just Maxim upon these Subjects, that in _Raillery_ a +good-natur'd Esteem ought always to appear, without any Resentment +or Bitterness; In _Satire_ a generous free Indignation, without any +sneaking Fear or Tenderness; It being a sort of partaking in the Guilt +to keep any Terms with Vices. + +It is from hence that _Juvenal_, as a _Satirist_, is greatly superior +to _Horace_; But indeed many of the short Compositions of _Horace_, +which are indiscriminately ranged together, under the general Name +of _Satires_, are not properly such, but Pieces of _Raillery_ or +_Ridicule_. + +As _Raillery_, in order to be decent, can only be exercised upon +_slight_ Misfortunes and Foibles, attended with no deep Mischief, nor +with any Reproach upon real Merit, so it ought only to be used between +_Equals_ and _Intimates_; It being evidently a Liberty too great to +be taken by an _Inferior_; and too inequitable to be taken by a +_Superior_, as his Rank shields him from any Return. + +_Raillery_ is the most agreeable, when it is founded on a _slight_ +Embarrassment or Foible, which upon being unfolded, appears to have +arisen from the _real Merit_, or from the _Excess_ of any _Virtue_, +in the Person attack'd. + +But yet this Embarrassment must always be _real_, and attended with +the Chagrin or Confusion of the _rally'd_ Person, or capable of being +fairly suppos'd to have been so; otherwise the Attack will be void of +all Poignancy, and Pleasure to the Company; And evaporate either into +_indirect Flattery_, or else into the _Insipid_. + +Thus, to attack a _fine Lady_ upon the Enemies she has made, by the +mischievous Effects of her Beauty, will be properly genteel indirect +_Flattery_--if it be well conducted,--otherwise, the _Insipid_; But +it cannot be deem'd _Raillery_; It being impossible to suppose the +Lady _really_ chagrin'd by such an imaginary Misfortune, or uneasy +at any Explanation upon this Subject; + +_Raillery_ ought soon to be ended; For by long keeping the Person +attack'd, even in a _slight_ Pain, and continuing to dwell upon +his Mis-adventures, you become rude and ill-natur'd;--Or if the +_Raillery_ be only turn'd upon an Embarrassment, arising from the +Excess of Merit or Abilities, Yet if it be long confined upon the same +Subject, the Person it is pointed at, will either suspect that your +Aim is, to leave some _Impression_ against him, or else that you are +designing him a tedious dark _Compliment_; And accordingly he will +either regard you with Hatred or Contempt;--Much less should a +Person, who introduces himself as a Subject of _Raillery_, insist long +upon it; For either he will be offensive in engrossing all Attention +to himself; or if the Company are pleas'd, it must be by his +Buffoonery. + +The Difference between _Satire_, and _Ridicule_, has been already +pointed out;--_Satire_ being always concerned with the _Vices_ of +_Persons_;--Whereas _Ridicule_ is justly employ'd, not upon the +_Vices_, but the _Foibles_ or _Meannesses_ of _Persons_, And also upon +the _Improprieties_ of other Subjects; And is directed, not to raise +your _Detestation_, but your _Derision_ and _Contempt_;--It being +evident that _Immoralities_ and _Vice_ are too _detestable_ for +_Ridicule_, and are therefore properly the Subject of _Satire_; +Whereas _Foibles_ and _Meannesses_ are too _harmless_ for _Satire_, +and deserve only to be treated with _Ridicule_. + +The usual Artillery of _Ridicule_ is _Wit_; whereby the _Affinity_ +or _Coincidence_ of any Object with others, which are absurd and +contemptible, is unexpectedly exhibited;--There is also another, very +forcible, Manner in which _Ridicule_ may act; And that is by employing +_Humour_ alone; Thus the Foible or Queerness of any Person will be +most fully _ridicul'd_, by naturally dressing yourself, or any other +Person in that Foible, and exerting its full Strength and Vigour. + + The POLITENESS of a Subject is the _Freedom_ of that Subject + from all _Indelicacy_, Aukardness_, and _Roughness_. + + GOOD BREEDING consists in a _respectful_ Carriage to others, + accompany'd with _Ease_ and _Politeness_. + +It appears from hence that GOOD BREEDING and POLITENESS differ in +this; that GOOD BREEDING relates only to the Manners of _Persons_ +in their Commerce together; Whereas Politeness may relate also to +_Books_, as well as to _Persons_, or to any Subjects of Taste and +Ornament. + +So that _Politeness_ may subsist in a Subject, as in a _Cornish_, or +_Architrave_, where _good Breeding_ can't enter; But it is impossible +for _good Breeding_ to be offer'd without _Politeness_. + +At the same time _good Breeding_ is not to be understood, as merely +the _Politeness_ of _Persons_; But as _Respect_, tender'd with +_Politeness_, in the Commerce between _Persons_. + +It is easy to perceive, that _good Breeding_ is a different Behaviour +in different Countries, and in the same Countries at different +Periods, according to the Manners which are us'd amongst _polite_ +Persons of those Places and Seasons. + +In _England_ the chief Point of it _formerly_ was plac'd, in carrying +a _Respect_ in our Manners to all we convers'd with; whence every +Omission of the slightest Ceremony, as it might be construed into +a want of _Respect_, was particularly to be avoided; So that _good +Breeding_ became then + a precise Observance and Exercise of all the Motions and + Ceremonies, expressive of Respect, which might justly be paid + to every Person; +--This, as it is easy to imagine, requir'd much Nicety in the +Adjustment upon many Occasions, and created immense Trouble and +Constraint, and most ridiculous Embarrassments. + +However, these Modes of _good Breeding_ were not to be abolished, +as it was impossible to dispense with the _Respect_ annex'd to them, +without some further Pretence than of their _Inconvenience_ only; +which no Person could decently urge, or admit in his own behalf, +when it was his Province to pay any Ceremonies to another; In this +Difficulty it was at last happily observ'd, for the Advantage of +genteel Commerce and Society, that _whatever gives Trouble, is +inconsistent with Respect_; Upon which Foundation, all Ceremonies +which create Embarrassments or Trouble to either Side, are now justly +exploded; And the _Ease_ of each other is the Point most peculiarly +consulted by _well-bred_ Persons. + +If this Attention to _Ease_ was properly conducted, so that it might +always appear to have _Respect_ for its Motive; And only to act in +Obedience to _that_, as the ruling Principle, it would then comprehend +the just Plan of _good Breeding_; But as _this_ was formerly +encumber'd with Ceremonies and Embarrassments, so the modern _good +Breeding_ perhaps deviates too far into Negligence and Disregard; +--A Fault more unpardonable than the former; As an Inconvenience, +evidently proceeding from the _Respect_ which is paid to us, may be +easily excus'd; But a Freedom, which carries the Air of _Neglect_ with +it, gives a lasting Offence. + + BEAUTY is the delightful _Effect_ which arises from the + _joint Order_, _Proportion_, and _Harmony_ of all the Parts + of an _Object_. +And + to have a good TASTE, is to have a just _Relish_ of BEAUTY. + + * * * * * + +[Transcriber's Note: + +Translations of Horace _Satire_ I.9 are available from Project +Gutenberg as e-text 5419 (verse translation, plain text) or +14020 (prose translation, text or html).] + + * * * * * + * * * * + * * * * * + +[CORBYN MORRIS] + +An / Essay / Towards Fixing the / True Standards / of / Wit, Humour, +Raillery, / Satire, and Ridicule. / To which is Added, an / Analysis / +Of the Characters of / An Humourist, Sir John Falstaff, Sir Roger / De +Coverly, and Don Quixote. / Inscribed, to the Right Honorable / Robert +Earl of Orford. / [rule] / By the Author of a / Letter from a By- +Stander. / [rule] /--Jacta est Alea. / [double rule] / London: / +Printed for J. Roberts, at the Oxford-Arms, in War- / wick-lane; and +W. Bickerton, In the Temple-Ex- / change, near the Inner-Temple-Gate, +Fleet-street. / M DCC XLIV. [Price 2 s.] / + +Collation: A, a-c, in fours; d in two; a-d, in fours; B-K in fours; +L in two. A, title; verso blank; A^2-d, dedication; d^2 erratum and +advertisements; a-d^4, Introduction; B-L^2, text. + +The first edition. A second edition was published in 1758. + +Colton Storm +Clements Library + + * * * * * + + + ANNOUNCING + + the + + _Publications_ + + + of + + + THE AUGUSTAN + + REPRINT SOCIETY + + + +_General Editors_ + +RICHARD C. BOYS +EDWARD NILES HOOKER +H.T. SWEDENBERG, JR. + + + * * * * * + + + _THE AUGUSTAN REPRINT SOCIETY_ + + Makes Available + + + _Inexpensive Reprints of Rare Materials_ + + + from + + ENGLISH LITERATURE OF THE + + SEVENTEENTH AND EIGHTEENTH CENTURIES + + +Students, scholars, and bibliographers of literature, history, and +philology will find the publications valuable. _The Johnsonian News +Letter_ has said of them: "Excellent facsimiles, and cheap in price, +these represent the triumph of modern scientific reproduction. Be sure +to become a subscriber; and take it upon yourself to see that your +college library is on the mailing list." + +The Augustan Reprint Society is a non-profit, scholarly organization, +run without overhead expense. By careful management it is able to +offer at least six publications each year at the unusually low +membership fee of $2.50 per year in the United States and Canada, and +$2.75 in Great Britain and the continent. + +Libraries as well as individuals are eligible for membership. Since +the publications are issued without profit, however, no discount can +be allowed to libraries, agents, or booksellers. + +New members may still obtain a complete run of the first year's +publications for $2.50, the annual membership fee. + +During the first two years the publications are issued in three +series: I. Essays on Wit; II. Essays on Poetry and Language; and III. +Essays on the Stage. + + * * * * * + + +PUBLICATIONS FOR THE FIRST YEAR (1946-1947) + +MAY, 1946: Series I, No. 1--Richard Blackmore's _Essay upon Wit_ +(1716), and Addison's _Freeholder_ No. 45 (1716). + +JULY, 1946: Series II, No. 1--Samuel Cobb's _Of Poetry_ and +_Discourse on Criticism_ (1707) + +SEPT., 1946: Series III, No. 1--Anon., _Letter to A.H. Esq.; +concerning the Stage_ (1698), and Richard Willis' _Occasional Paper_ +No. IX (1698). + +NOV., 1946: Series I, No. 2--Anon., _Essay on Wit_ (1748), together +with Characters by Flecknoe, and Joseph Warton's _Adventurer_ Nos. 127 +and 133. + +JAN., 1947: Series II, No. 2--Samuel Wesley's _Epistle to a Friend +Concerning Poetry_ (1700) and _Essay on Heroic Poetry_ (1693). + +MARCH, 1947: Series III, No. 2--Anon., _Representation of the Impiety +and Immorality of the Stage_ (1704) and anon., _Some Thoughts +Concerning the Stage_ (1704). + + +PUBLICATIONS FOR THE SECOND YEAR (1947-1948) + +MAY, 1947: Series I, No. 3--John Gay's _The Present State of Wit_; +and a section on Wit from _The English Theophrastus_. With an +Introduction by Donald Bond. + +JULY, 1947: Series II, No. 3--Rapin's _De Carmine Pastorali_, +translated by Creech. With an Introduction by J. E. Congleton. + +SEPT., 1947: Series III, No. 3--T. Hanmer's (?) _Some Remarks on the +Tragedy of Hamlet_. With an Introduction by Clarence D. Thorpe. + +NOV., 1947: Series I, No. 4--Corbyn Morris' _Essay towards Fixing the +True Standards of Wit_, etc. With an Introduction by James L. +Clifford. + +JAN., 1948: Series II, No. 4--Thomas Purney's _Discourse on the +Pastoral_. With an Introduction by Earl Wasserman. + +MARCH, 1948: Series III, No. 4--Essays on the Stage, selected, with +an Introduction by Joseph Wood Krutch. + + +The list of publications is subject to modification in response to +requests by members. From time to time Bibliographical Notes will be +included in the issues. Each issue contains an Introduction by a +scholar of special competence in the field represented. + +The Augustan Reprints are available only to members. They will never +be offered at "remainder" prices. + + + + + +End of the Project Gutenberg EBook of An Essay towards Fixing the True +Standards of Wit, Humour, Railery, Satire, and Ridicule (1744), by Corbyn Morris + +*** END OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK FIXING THE TRUE STANDARDS OF WIT *** + +***** This file should be named 16233.txt or 16233.zip ***** +This and all associated files of various formats will be found in: + https://www.gutenberg.org/1/6/2/3/16233/ + +Produced by David Starner, Louise Hope and the Online +Distributed Proofreading Team at https://www.pgdp.net. + + +Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions +will be renamed. + +Creating the works from public domain print editions means that no +one owns a United States copyright in these works, so the Foundation +(and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United States without +permission and without paying copyright royalties. Special rules, +set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license, apply to +copying and distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works to +protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm concept and trademark. Project +Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if you +charge for the eBooks, unless you receive specific permission. If you +do not charge anything for copies of this eBook, complying with the +rules is very easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose +such as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and +research. They may be modified and printed and given away--you may do +practically ANYTHING with public domain eBooks. Redistribution is +subject to the trademark license, especially commercial +redistribution. + + + +*** START: FULL LICENSE *** + +THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE +PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK + +To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free +distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work +(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project +Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full Project +Gutenberg-tm License (available with this file or online at +https://gutenberg.org/license). + + +Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic works + +1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to +and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property +(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all +the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or destroy +all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your possession. +If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the +terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or +entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8. + +1.B. "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark. It may only be +used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who +agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few +things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works +even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See +paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement +and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works. See paragraph 1.E below. + +1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the Foundation" +or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection of Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic works. Nearly all the individual works in the +collection are in the public domain in the United States. If an +individual work is in the public domain in the United States and you are +located in the United States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from +copying, distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative +works based on the work as long as all references to Project Gutenberg +are removed. Of course, we hope that you will support the Project +Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting free access to electronic works by +freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm works in compliance with the terms of +this agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with +the work. You can easily comply with the terms of this agreement by +keeping this work in the same format with its attached full Project +Gutenberg-tm License when you share it without charge with others. + +1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern +what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are in +a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States, check +the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this agreement +before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, distributing or +creating derivative works based on this work or any other Project +Gutenberg-tm work. The Foundation makes no representations concerning +the copyright status of any work in any country outside the United +States. + +1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg: + +1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate +access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear prominently +whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work on which the +phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the phrase "Project +Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed, viewed, +copied or distributed: + +This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with +almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or +re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included +with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org + +1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is derived +from the public domain (does not contain a notice indicating that it is +posted with permission of the copyright holder), the work can be copied +and distributed to anyone in the United States without paying any fees +or charges. If you are redistributing or providing access to a work +with the phrase "Project Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the +work, you must comply either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1 +through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the +Project Gutenberg-tm trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or +1.E.9. + +1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted +with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution +must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any additional +terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms will be linked +to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works posted with the +permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of this work. + +1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm +License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this +work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm. + +1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this +electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without +prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with +active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project +Gutenberg-tm License. + +1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary, +compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including any +word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access to or +distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format other than +"Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official version +posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm web site (www.gutenberg.org), +you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a +copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon +request, of the work in its original "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other +form. Any alternate format must include the full Project Gutenberg-tm +License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1. + +1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying, +performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works +unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9. + +1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing +access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works provided +that + +- You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from + the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method + you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is + owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he + has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the + Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments + must be paid within 60 days following each date on which you + prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your periodic tax + returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked as such and + sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the + address specified in Section 4, "Information about donations to + the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation." + +- You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies + you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he + does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm + License. You must require such a user to return or + destroy all copies of the works possessed in a physical medium + and discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of + Project Gutenberg-tm works. + +- You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any + money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the + electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days + of receipt of the work. + +- You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free + distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works. + +1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set +forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from +both the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and Michael +Hart, the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark. Contact the +Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below. + +1.F. + +1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable +effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread +public domain works in creating the Project Gutenberg-tm +collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may contain +"Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or +corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual +property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other medium, a +computer virus, or computer codes that damage or cannot be read by +your equipment. + +1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right +of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project +Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project +Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all +liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal +fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT +LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE +PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH F3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE +TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE +LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR +INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH +DAMAGE. + +1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a +defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can +receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a +written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you +received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium with +your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you with +the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu of a +refund. If you received the work electronically, the person or entity +providing it to you may choose to give you a second opportunity to +receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If the second copy +is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing without further +opportunities to fix the problem. + +1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth +in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS' WITH NO OTHER +WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO +WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTIBILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE. + +1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied +warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages. +If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the +law of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be +interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by +the applicable state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any +provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions. + +1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the +trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone +providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in accordance +with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the production, +promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works, +harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees, +that arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do +or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg-tm +work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or deletions to any +Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any Defect you cause. + + +Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm + +Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of +electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of computers +including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It exists +because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations from +people in all walks of life. + +Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the +assistance they need, is critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's +goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will +remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project +Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure +and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future generations. +To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation +and how your efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4 +and the Foundation web page at https://www.pglaf.org. + + +Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive +Foundation + +The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non profit +501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the +state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal +Revenue Service. The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification +number is 64-6221541. Its 501(c)(3) letter is posted at +https://pglaf.org/fundraising. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg +Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent +permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state's laws. + +The Foundation's principal office is located at 4557 Melan Dr. S. +Fairbanks, AK, 99712., but its volunteers and employees are scattered +throughout numerous locations. Its business office is located at +809 North 1500 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887, email +business@pglaf.org. Email contact links and up to date contact +information can be found at the Foundation's web site and official +page at https://pglaf.org + +For additional contact information: + Dr. Gregory B. Newby + Chief Executive and Director + gbnewby@pglaf.org + + +Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg +Literary Archive Foundation + +Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without wide +spread public support and donations to carry out its mission of +increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be +freely distributed in machine readable form accessible by the widest +array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations +($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt +status with the IRS. + +The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating +charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United +States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a +considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up +with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations +where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To +SEND DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any +particular state visit https://pglaf.org + +While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we +have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition +against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who +approach us with offers to donate. + +International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make +any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from +outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff. + +Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation +methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other +ways including including checks, online payments and credit card +donations. To donate, please visit: https://pglaf.org/donate + + +Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works. + +Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project Gutenberg-tm +concept of a library of electronic works that could be freely shared +with anyone. For thirty years, he produced and distributed Project +Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer support. + + +Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed +editions, all of which are confirmed as Public Domain in the U.S. +unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not necessarily +keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper edition. + + +Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search facility: + + https://www.gutenberg.org + +This Web site includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm, +including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary +Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to +subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks. |