summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/16182-h/16182-h.htm
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to '16182-h/16182-h.htm')
-rw-r--r--16182-h/16182-h.htm22610
1 files changed, 22610 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/16182-h/16182-h.htm b/16182-h/16182-h.htm
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..e3e2128
--- /dev/null
+++ b/16182-h/16182-h.htm
@@ -0,0 +1,22610 @@
+<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
+<html lang="en">
+<head>
+<meta http-equiv="Content-Type"
+ content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
+<title>The Project Gutenberg eBook of The Letters of Robert Browning and Elizabeth Barrett Barrett
+</title>
+<style type="text/css">
+ <!--
+ body { margin-left: 5%; margin-right: 5%; }
+ p { text-indent: 2em;
+ margin-top: .75em;
+ font-size: 100%;
+ text-align: justify;
+ margin-bottom: .75em; }
+ h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6 { text-align: center; }
+ hr { width: 50%; }
+ hr.full { width: 100%; }
+ .foot { margin-left: 10%; margin-right: 10%; text-align: justify; text-indent: -3em; font-size: 85%; }
+ .poem { margin-left: 10%; margin-right: 10%; margin-bottom: 1em; text-align: left; }
+ .poem .stanza { margin: 1em 0em 1em 0em; }
+ .poem p { margin: 0; padding-left: 3em; text-indent: -3em; }
+ .poem p.i2 { margin-left: 1em; }
+ .poem p.i4 { margin-left: 2em; }
+ .poem p.i6 { margin-left: 3em; }
+ .poem p.i8 { margin-left: 4em; }
+ .poem p.i10 { margin-left: 5em; }
+ .toc { margin-left: 15%; font-size: 80%; margin-bottom: 0em;}
+ center { padding: 0.8em;}
+ SPAN.sc-ex { font-variant: small-caps }
+ // -->
+</style>
+</head>
+<body>
+
+
+<pre>
+
+The Project Gutenberg EBook of The Letters of Robert Browning and
+Elizabeth Barrett Barrett, Vol. 1 (of 2) 1845-1846, Edited by
+Robert B. Browning
+
+This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with
+almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or
+re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included
+with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org
+
+
+Title: The Letters of Robert Browning and Elizabeth Barrett Barrett, Vol. 1 (of 2) 1845-1846
+
+Author: Robert Browning and Elizabeth Barrett Barrett
+
+Editor: Robert B.Browning
+
+Release Date: July 2, 2005 [EBook #16182]
+
+Language: English
+
+Character set encoding: ISO-8859-1
+
+*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK LETTERS OF BROWNING ***
+
+
+
+
+Produced by Jonathan Ingram, Linda Cantoni, and the Online
+Distributed Proofreading Team at https://www.pgdp.net
+
+
+
+
+
+
+</pre>
+
+
+<br>
+<h1>
+ THE LETTERS
+</h1>
+<h2> OF
+</h2>
+<h1>
+ ROBERT BROWNING
+</h1>
+<h2>
+ AND
+</h2>
+<h1>
+ ELIZABETH BARRETT BARRETT
+</h1>
+<h2>
+ 1845-1846
+</h2>
+<center>
+ <i>WITH PORTRAITS AND FACSIMILES</i>
+</center>
+<center>
+ IN TWO VOLUMES
+</center>
+<center>
+ VOL. I.
+</center>
+<center>
+ FOURTH IMPRESSION
+</center>
+<center>
+ LONDON
+</center>
+<center>
+ SMITH, ELDER, &amp; CO., 15 WATERLOO PLACE
+</center>
+<center>
+ 1900
+</center>
+<a name="image-0001"><!--IMG--></a>
+<center>
+<img src="images/image01.png" width="326" height="419"
+alt="Robert Browning">
+</center>
+<!--IMAGE END-->
+<p style="text-align: center">
+ <b>Robert Browning</b></p>
+
+<p style="text-align: center">
+ from an oil painting by Gordigiani</p>
+
+<br>
+<hr>
+<br>
+
+<h2>
+ NOTE
+</h2>
+<p>
+ In considering the question of publishing these letters, which are all
+ that ever passed between my father and mother, for after their
+ marriage they were never separated, it seemed to me that my only
+ alternatives were to allow them to be published or to destroy them. I
+ might, indeed, have left the matter to the decision of others after my
+ death, but that would be evading a responsibility which I feel that I
+ ought to accept.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Ever since my mother's death these letters were kept by my father in a
+ certain inlaid box, into which they exactly fitted, and where they
+ have always rested, letter beside letter, each in its consecutive
+ order and numbered on the envelope by his own hand.
+</p>
+<p>
+ My father destroyed all the rest of his correspondence, and not long
+ before his death he said, referring to these letters: 'There they are,
+ do with them as you please when I am dead and gone!'
+</p>
+<p>
+ A few of the letters are of little or no interest, but their omission
+ would have saved only a few pages, and I think it well that the
+ correspondence should be given in its entirety.
+</p>
+<p>
+ I wish to express my gratitude to my father's friend and mine, Mrs.
+ Miller Morison, for her unfailing sympathy and assistance in
+ deciphering some words which had become scarcely legible owing to
+ faded ink.
+</p>
+ <p align="right" style="text-align: right">R.B.B.
+ </p>
+
+ <p style="text-indent: 0em; margin-top: 0; margin-bottom: 0">1898.</p>
+<br>
+<hr>
+<br>
+
+
+<h2>
+ ADVERTISEMENT
+</h2>
+<p>
+ The correspondence contained in these volumes is printed exactly as it
+ appears in the original letters, without alteration, except in respect
+ of obvious slips of the pen. Even the punctuation, with its
+ characteristic dots and dashes, has for the most part been preserved.
+ The notes in square brackets [] have been added mainly in order to
+ translate the Greek phrases, and to give the references to Greek
+ poets. For these, thanks are due to Mr. F.G. Kenyon, who has revised
+ the proofs with the assistance of Mr. Roger Ingpen, the latter being
+ responsible for the Index.
+</p>
+<br>
+<hr>
+<br>
+
+<h2>
+ ILLUSTRATIONS
+</h2>
+<p>
+
+<br>
+<br><a href="#image-0001">PORTRAIT OF ROBERT BROWNING</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;<i>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Frontispiece</i>
+<br> <i>After the picture by Gordigiani</i></p>
+<p style="text-indent: 0em"><a href="#image-0004">FACSIMILE OF LETTER OF ROBERT BROWNING</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;<i>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; To face p. 578</i></p>
+<br>
+<hr>
+<br>
+
+
+<h3>
+ THE LETTERS OF</h3>
+
+<h2>
+ ROBERT BROWNING</h2>
+
+<h3>
+ AND </h3>
+
+<h2>ELIZABETH BARRETT BARRETT</h2>
+
+<h3>
+ 1845-1846 </h3>
+ <br>
+ <hr>
+ <br>
+
+
+<h3>
+ <i>R.B. to E.B.B.</i>
+</h3>
+<p style="text-indent: 0em; text-align: right; margin-top: 0; margin-bottom: 0"> New Cross, Hatcham, Surrey.<br>
+ [Post-mark, January 10, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ I <SPAN class="sc-ex">love</span> your verses with all my heart, dear Miss Barrett,&mdash;and this is
+ no off-hand complimentary letter that I shall write,&mdash;whatever else,
+ no prompt matter-of-course recognition of your genius, and there a
+ graceful and natural end of the thing. Since the day last week when I
+ first read your poems, I quite laugh to remember how I have been
+ turning and turning again in my mind what I should be able to tell you
+ of their effect upon me, for in the first flush of delight I thought I
+ would this once get out of my habit of purely passive enjoyment, when
+ I do really enjoy, and thoroughly justify my admiration&mdash;perhaps even,
+ as a loyal fellow-craftsman should, try and find fault and do you some
+ little good to be proud of hereafter!&mdash;but nothing comes of it all&mdash;so
+ into me has it gone, and part of me has it become, this great living
+ poetry of yours, not a flower of which but took root and grew&mdash;Oh, how
+ different that is from lying to be dried and pressed flat, and prized
+ highly, and put in a book with a proper account at top and bottom,
+ and shut up and put away ... and the book called a 'Flora,' besides!
+ After all, I need not give up the thought of doing that, too, in time;
+ because even now, talking with whoever is worthy, I can give a reason
+ for my faith in one and another excellence, the fresh strange music,
+ the affluent language, the exquisite pathos and true new brave
+ thought; but in this addressing myself to you&mdash;your own self, and for
+ the first time, my feeling rises altogether. I do, as I say, love
+ these books with all my heart&mdash;and I love you too. Do you know I was
+ once not very far from seeing&mdash;really seeing you? Mr. Kenyon said to
+ me one morning 'Would you like to see Miss Barrett?' then he went to
+ announce me,&mdash;then he returned ... you were too unwell, and now it is
+ years ago, and I feel as at some untoward passage in my travels, as if
+ I had been close, so close, to some world's-wonder in chapel or crypt,
+ only a screen to push and I might have entered, but there was some
+ slight, so it now seems, slight and just sufficient bar to admission,
+ and the half-opened door shut, and I went home my thousands of miles,
+ and the sight was never to be?
+</p>
+<p>
+ Well, these Poems were to be, and this true thankful joy and pride
+ with which I feel myself,
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">&nbsp;Yours ever faithfully,&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; </p>
+<p style="text-align: right"><SPAN class="sc-ex">Robert Browning</span>.
+</p>
+<p style="text-indent: 0em">Miss Barrett,<b><a href="#note-1">1</a></b><br>
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
+50 Wimpole St.<br>
+R. Browning.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3>
+ <i>E.B.B. to R.B.</i>
+</h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">50 Wimpole Street: Jan. 11, 1845.
+</p>
+<p>
+ I thank you, dear Mr. Browning, from the bottom of my heart. You meant
+ to give me pleasure by your letter&mdash;and even if the object had not
+ been answered, I ought still to thank you. But it is thoroughly
+ answered. Such a letter from such a hand! Sympathy is dear&mdash;very dear
+ to me: but the sympathy of a poet, and of such a poet, is the
+ quintessence of sympathy to me! Will you take back my gratitude for
+ it?&mdash;agreeing, too, that of all the commerce done in the world, from
+ Tyre to Carthage, the exchange of sympathy for gratitude is the most
+ princely thing!
+</p>
+<p>
+ For the rest you draw me on with your kindness. It is difficult to get
+ rid of people when you once have given them too much pleasure&mdash;<i>that</i>
+ is a fact, and we will not stop for the moral of it. What I was going
+ to say&mdash;after a little natural hesitation&mdash;is, that if ever you emerge
+ without inconvenient effort from your 'passive state,' and will <i>tell</i>
+ me of such faults as rise to the surface and strike you as important
+ in my poems, (for of course, I do not think of troubling you with
+ criticism in detail) you will confer a lasting obligation on me, and
+ one which I shall value so much, that I covet it at a distance. I do
+ not pretend to any extraordinary meekness under criticism and it is
+ possible enough that I might not be altogether obedient to yours. But
+ with my high respect for your power in your Art and for your
+ experience as an artist, it would be quite impossible for me to hear a
+ general observation of yours on what appear to you my master-faults,
+ without being the better for it hereafter in some way. I ask for only
+ a sentence or two of general observation&mdash;and I do not ask even for
+ <i>that</i>, so as to tease you&mdash;but in the humble, low voice, which is so
+ excellent a thing in women&mdash;particularly when they go a-begging! The
+ most frequent general criticism I receive, is, I think, upon the
+ style,&mdash;'if I <i>would</i> but change my style'! But <i>that</i> is an objection
+ (isn't it?) to the writer bodily? Buffon says, and every sincere
+ writer must feel, that '<i>Le style c'est l'homme</i>'; a fact, however,
+ scarcely calculated to lessen the objection with certain critics.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Is it indeed true that I was so near to the pleasure and honour of
+ making your acquaintance? and can it be true that you look back upon
+ the lost opportunity with any regret? <i>But</i>&mdash;you know&mdash;if you had
+ entered the 'crypt,' you might have caught cold, or been tired to
+ death, and <i>wished</i> yourself 'a thousand miles off;' which would have
+ been worse than travelling them. It is not my interest, however, to
+ put such thoughts in your head about its being 'all for the best'; and
+ I would rather hope (as I do) that what I lost by one chance I may
+ recover by some future one. Winters shut me up as they do dormouse's
+ eyes; in the spring, <i>we shall see</i>: and I am so much better that I
+ seem turning round to the outward world again. And in the meantime I
+ have learnt to know your voice, not merely from the poetry but from
+ the kindness in it. Mr. Kenyon often speaks of you&mdash;dear Mr.
+ Kenyon!&mdash;who most unspeakably, or only speakably with tears in my
+ eyes,&mdash;has been my friend and helper, and my book's friend and helper!
+ critic and sympathiser, true friend of all hours! You know him well
+ enough, I think, to understand that I must be grateful to him.
+</p>
+<p>
+ I am writing too much,&mdash;and notwithstanding that I am writing too
+ much, I will write of one thing more. I will say that I am your
+ debtor, not only for this cordial letter and for all the pleasure
+ which came with it, but in other ways, and those the highest: and I
+ will say that while I live to follow this divine art of poetry, in
+ proportion to my love for it and my devotion to it, I must be a devout
+ admirer and student of your works. This is in my heart to say to
+ you&mdash;and I say it.
+</p>
+<p>
+ And, for the rest, I am proud to remain</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">
+ Your obliged and faithful&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
+</p>
+
+<p style="text-align: right">
+<SPAN class="sc-ex">Elizabeth B. Barrett</span>.
+</p>
+<p style="text-indent: 0em">Robert Browning, Esq.<br>
+ &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
+ New Cross, Hatcham, Surrey.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3>
+ <i>R.B. to E.B.B.</i>
+</h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">New Cross, Hatcham, Surrey.<br>
+Jan. 13, 1845.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Dear Miss Barrett,&mdash;I just shall say, in as few words as I can, that
+ you make me very happy, and that, now the beginning is over, I dare
+ say I shall do better, because my poor praise, number one, was nearly
+ as felicitously brought out, as a certain tribute to no less a
+ personage than Tasso, which I was amused with at Rome some weeks ago,
+ in a neat pencilling on the plaister-wall by his tomb at
+ Sant'Onofrio&mdash;'Alla cara memoria&mdash;di&mdash;(please fancy solemn interspaces
+ and grave capital letters at the new lines) di&mdash;Torquato Tasso&mdash;il
+ Dottore Bernardini&mdash;offriva&mdash;il seguente Carme&mdash;<i>O tu</i>'&mdash;and no
+ more,&mdash;the good man, it should seem, breaking down with the overload
+ of love here! But my 'O tu'&mdash;was breathed out most sincerely, and now
+ you have taken it in gracious part, the rest will come after.
+ Only,&mdash;and which is why I write now&mdash;it looks as if I have introduced
+ some phrase or other about 'your faults' so cleverly as to give
+ exactly the opposite meaning to what I meant, which was, that in my
+ first ardour I had thought to tell you of <i>everything</i> which impressed
+ me in your verses, down, even, to whatever 'faults' I could find,&mdash;a
+ good earnest, when I had got to <i>them</i>, that I had left out not much
+ between&mdash;as if some Mr. Fellows were to say, in the overflow of his
+ first enthusiasm of rewarded adventure: 'I will describe you all the
+ outer life and ways of these Lycians, down to their very
+ sandal-thongs,' whereto the be-corresponded one rejoins&mdash;'Shall I get
+ next week, then, your dissertation on sandal-thongs'? Yes, and a
+ little about the 'Olympian Horses,' and God-charioteers as well!
+</p>
+<p>
+ What 'struck me as faults,' were not matters on the removal of which,
+ one was to have&mdash;poetry, or high poetry,&mdash;but the very highest poetry,
+ so I thought, and that, to universal recognition. For myself, or any
+ artist, in many of the cases there would be a positive loss of time,
+ peculiar artist's pleasure&mdash;for an instructed eye loves to see where
+ the brush has dipped twice in a lustrous colour, has lain insistingly
+ along a favourite outline, dwelt lovingly in a grand shadow; for these
+ 'too muches' for the everybody's picture are so many helps to the
+ making out the real painter's picture as he had it in his brain. And
+ all of the Titian's Naples Magdalen must have once been golden in its
+ degree to justify that heap of hair in her hands&mdash;the <i>only</i> gold
+ effected now!
+</p>
+<p>
+ But about this soon&mdash;for night is drawing on and I go out, yet cannot,
+ quiet at conscience, till I report (to <i>myself</i>, for I never said it
+ to you, I think) that your poetry must be, cannot but be, infinitely
+ more to me than mine to you&mdash;for you <i>do</i> what I always wanted, hoped
+ to do, and only seem now likely to do for the first time. You speak
+ out, <i>you</i>,&mdash;I only make men and women speak&mdash;give you truth broken
+ into prismatic hues, and fear the pure white light, even if it is in
+ me, but I am going to try; so it will be no small comfort to have your
+ company just now, seeing that when you have your men and women
+ aforesaid, you are busied with them, whereas it seems bleak,
+ melancholy work, this talking to the wind (for I have begun)&mdash;yet I
+ don't think I shall let <i>you</i> hear, after all, the savage things about
+ Popes and imaginative religions that I must say.
+</p>
+<p>
+ See how I go on and on to you, I who, whenever now and then pulled, by
+ the head and hair, into letter-writing, get sorrowfully on for a line
+ or two, as the cognate creature urged on by stick and string, and then
+ come down 'flop' upon the sweet haven of page one, line last, as
+ serene as the sleep of the virtuous! You will never more, I hope, talk
+ of 'the honour of my acquaintance,' but I will joyfully wait for the
+ delight of your friendship, and the spring, and my Chapel-sight after
+ all!</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">
+ Ever yours most faithfully,</p>
+
+<p style="text-align: right"><SPAN class="sc-ex">R. Browning</span>.
+</p>
+<p>
+ For Mr. Kenyon&mdash;I have a convenient theory about <i>him</i>, and his
+ otherwise quite unaccountable kindness to me; but 'tis quite night
+ now, and they call me.
+</p>
+
+<br>
+
+<h3>
+ <i>E.B.B. to R.B.</i>
+</h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">50 Wimpole Street: Jan. 15, 1845.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Dear Mr. Browning,&mdash;The fault was clearly with me and not with you.
+</p>
+<p>
+ When I had an Italian master, years ago, he told me that there was an
+ unpronounceable English word which absolutely expressed me, and which
+ he would say in his own tongue, as he could not in mine&mdash;'<i>testa
+ lunga</i>.' Of course, the signor meant <i>headlong</i>!&mdash;and now I have had
+ enough to tame me, and might be expected to stand still in my stall.
+ But you see I do not. Headlong I was at first, and headlong I
+ continue&mdash;precipitously rushing forward through all manner of nettles
+ and briars instead of keeping the path; guessing at the meaning of
+ unknown words instead of looking into the dictionary&mdash;tearing open
+ letters, and never untying a string,&mdash;and expecting everything to be
+ done in a minute, and the thunder to be as quick as the lightning. And
+ so, at your half word I flew at the whole one, with all its possible
+ consequences, and wrote what you read. Our common friend, as I think
+ he is, Mr. Horne, is often forced to entreat me into patience and
+ coolness of purpose, though his only intercourse with me has been by
+ letter. And, by the way, you will be sorry to hear that during his
+ stay in Germany <i>he</i> has been 'headlong' (out of a metaphor) twice;
+ once, in falling from the Drachenfels, when he only just saved himself
+ by catching at a vine; and once quite lately, at Christmas, in a fall
+ on the ice of the Elbe in skating, when he dislocated his left
+ shoulder in a very painful manner. He is doing quite well, I believe,
+ but it was sad to have such a shadow from the German Christmas tree,
+ and he a stranger.
+</p>
+<p>
+ In art, however, I understand that it does not do to be headlong, but
+ patient and laborious&mdash;and there is a love strong enough, even in me, to
+ overcome nature. I apprehend what you mean in the criticism you just
+ intimate, and shall turn it over and over in my mind until I get practical
+ good from it. What no mere critic sees, but what you, an artist, know, is
+ the difference between the thing desired and the thing attained, between the
+ idea in the writer's mind and the <span title="eidôlon">&epsilon;&iota;&delta;&omega;&lambda;&omicron;&nu;</span> cast off in his work. All the effort&mdash;the quick'ning of the
+ breath and beating of the heart in pursuit, which is ruffling and
+ injurious to the general effect of a composition; all which you call
+ 'insistency,' and which many would call superfluity, and which <i>is</i>
+ superfluous in a sense&mdash;<i>you</i> can pardon, because you understand. The
+ great chasm between the thing I say, and the thing I would say, would
+ be quite dispiriting to me, in spite even of such kindnesses as yours,
+ if the desire did not master the despondency. 'Oh for a horse with
+ wings!' It is wrong of me to write so of myself&mdash;only you put your
+ finger on the root of a fault, which has, to my fancy, been a little
+ misapprehended. I do not <i>say everything I think</i> (as has been said of
+ me by master-critics) but I <i>take every means to say what I think</i>,
+ which is different!&mdash;or I fancy so!
+</p>
+<p>
+ In one thing, however, you are wrong. Why should you deny the full
+ measure of my delight and benefit from your writings? I could tell you
+ why you should not. You have in your vision two worlds, or to use the
+ language of the schools of the day, you are both subjective and
+ objective in the habits of your mind. You can deal both with abstract
+ thought and with human passion in the most passionate sense. Thus, you
+ have an immense grasp in Art; and no one at all accustomed to consider
+ the usual forms of it, could help regarding with reverence and
+ gladness the gradual expansion of your powers. Then you are
+ 'masculine' to the height&mdash;and I, as a woman, have studied some of
+ your gestures of language and intonation wistfully, as a thing beyond
+ me far! and the more admirable for being beyond.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Of your new work I hear with delight. How good of you to tell me. And
+ it is not dramatic in the strict sense, I am to understand&mdash;(am I
+ right in understanding so?) and you speak, in your own person 'to the
+ winds'? no&mdash;but to the thousand living sympathies which will awake to
+ hear you. A great dramatic power may develop itself otherwise than in
+ the formal drama; and I have been guilty of wishing, before this hour
+ (for reasons which I will not thrust upon you after all my tedious
+ writing), that you would give the public a poem unassociated directly
+ or indirectly with the stage, for a trial on the popular heart. I
+ reverence the drama, but&mdash;
+</p>
+<p>
+ <i>But</i> I break in on myself out of consideration for you. I might have
+ done it, you will think, before. I vex your 'serene sleep of the
+ virtuous' like a nightmare. Do not say 'No.' I am <i>sure</i> I do! As to
+ the vain parlance of the world, I did not talk of the 'honour of your
+ acquaintance' without a true sense of honour, indeed; but I shall
+ willingly exchange it all (and <i>now</i>, if you please, at this moment,
+ for fear of worldly mutabilities) for the 'delight of your
+ friendship.'
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">Believe me, therefore, dear Mr. Browning,
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">
+Faithfully yours, and gratefully,
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">
+<SPAN class="sc-ex">Elizabeth B. Barrett</span>.
+</p>
+<p>
+ For Mr. Kenyon's kindness, as <i>I</i> see it, no theory will account. I
+ class it with mesmerism for that reason.
+</p>
+<br>
+
+<h3>
+ <i>R.B. to E.B.B.</i>
+</h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">New Cross, Hatcham, Monday Night.<br>
+ [Post-mark, January 28, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ Dear Miss Barrett,&mdash;Your books lie on my table here, at arm's length
+ from me, in this old room where I sit all day: and when my head aches
+ or wanders or strikes work, as it now or then will, I take my chance
+ for either green-covered volume, as if it were so much fresh trefoil
+ to feel in one's hands this winter-time,&mdash;and round I turn, and,
+ putting a decisive elbow on three or four half-done-with 'Bells' of
+ mine, read, read, read, and just as I have shut up the book and walked
+ to the window, I recollect that you wanted me to find faults there,
+ and that, in an unwise hour, I engaged to do so. Meantime, the days
+ go by (the whitethroat is come and sings now) and as I would not have
+ you 'look down on me from your white heights' as promise breaker,
+ evader, or forgetter, if I could help: and as, if I am very candid and
+ contrite, you may find it in your heart to write to me again&mdash;who
+ knows?&mdash;I shall say at once that the said faults cannot be lost, must
+ be <i>somewhere</i>, and shall be faithfully brought you back whenever they
+ turn up,&mdash;as people tell one of missing matters. I am rather exacting,
+ myself, with my own gentle audience, and get to say spiteful things
+ about them when they are backward in their dues of appreciation&mdash;but
+ really, <i>really</i>&mdash;could I be quite sure that anybody as good as&mdash;I
+ must go on, I suppose, and say&mdash;as myself, even, were honestly to feel
+ towards me as I do, towards the writer of 'Bertha,' and the 'Drama,'
+ and the 'Duchess,' and the 'Page' and&mdash;the whole two volumes, I should
+ be paid after a fashion, I know.
+</p>
+<p>
+ One thing I can do&mdash;pencil, if you like, and annotate, and dissertate
+ upon that I love most and least&mdash;I think I can do it, that is.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Here an odd memory comes&mdash;of a friend who,&mdash;volunteering such a
+ service to a sonnet-writing somebody, gave him a taste of his quality
+ in a side-column of short criticisms on sonnet the First, and starting
+ off the beginning three lines with, of course, 'bad, worse,
+ worst'&mdash;made by a generous mintage of words to meet the sudden run of
+ his epithets, 'worser, worserer, worserest' pay off the second terzet
+ in full&mdash;no 'badder, badderer, badderest' fell to the <i>Second's</i>
+ allowance, and 'worser' &amp;c. answered the demands of the Third;
+ 'worster, worsterer, worsterest' supplied the emergency of the Fourth;
+ and, bestowing his last 'worserestest and worstestest' on lines 13 and
+ 14, my friend (slapping his forehead like an emptied strong-box)
+ frankly declared himself bankrupt, and honourably incompetent, to
+ satisfy the reasonable expectations of the rest of the series!
+</p>
+<p>
+ What an illustration of the law by which opposite ideas suggest
+ opposite, and contrary images come together!
+</p>
+<p>
+ See now, how, of that 'Friendship' you offer me (and here Juliet's
+ word rises to my lips)&mdash;I feel sure once and for ever. I have got
+ already, I see, into this little pet-handwriting of mine (not anyone
+ else's) which scratches on as if theatrical copyists (ah me!) and
+ <SPAN class="sc-ex">Bradbury and Evans' Reader</span> were not! But you shall get something
+ better than this nonsense one day, if you will have patience with
+ me&mdash;hardly better, though, because this does me real good, gives real
+ relief, to write. After all, you know nothing, next to nothing of me,
+ and that stops me. Spring is to come, however!
+</p>
+<p>
+ If you hate writing to me as I hate writing to nearly everybody, I
+ pray you never write&mdash;if you do, as you say, care for anything I have
+ done. I will simply assure you, that meaning to begin work in deep
+ earnest, <i>begin</i> without affectation, God knows,&mdash;I do not know what
+ will help me more than hearing from you,&mdash;and therefore, if you do not
+ so very much hate it, I know I <i>shall</i> hear from you&mdash;and very little
+ more about your 'tiring me.'
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">Ever yours faithfully,&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">
+ <SPAN class="sc-ex">Robert Browning</span>.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3>
+ <i>E.B.B. to R.B.</i>
+</h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">50 Walpole Street: Feb. 3, 1845.<br>
+<i>[Transcriber's Note: So in original. Should be "Wimpole Street."] </i>
+</p>
+<p>
+ Why how could I hate to write to you, dear Mr. Browning? Could you
+ believe in such a thing? If nobody likes writing to everybody (except
+ such professional letter writers as you and I are <i>not</i>), yet
+ everybody likes writing to somebody, and it would be strange and
+ contradictory if I were not always delighted both to hear from <i>you</i>
+ and to write to <i>you</i>, this talking upon paper being as good a social
+ pleasure as another, when our means are somewhat straitened. As for
+ me, I have done most of my talking by post of late years&mdash;as people
+ shut up in dungeons take up with scrawling mottoes on the walls. Not
+ that I write to many in the way of regular correspondence, as our
+ friend Mr. Horne predicates of me in his romances (which is mere
+ romancing!), but that there are a few who will write and be written to
+ by me without a sense of injury. Dear Miss Mitford, for instance. You
+ do not know her, I think, personally, although she was the first to
+ tell me (when I was very ill and insensible to all the glories of the
+ world except poetry), of the grand scene in 'Pippa Passes.' <i>She</i> has
+ filled a large drawer in this room with delightful letters, heart-warm
+ and soul-warm, ... driftings of nature (if sunshine could drift like
+ snow), and which, if they should ever fall the way of all writing,
+ into print, would assume the folio shape as a matter of course, and
+ take rank on the lowest shelf of libraries, with Benedictine editions
+ of the Fathers, <span title="k.t.l.">&kappa;.&tau;.&lambda;</span>. I write this to you to show how I can
+ have pleasure in letters, and never think them too long, nor too
+ frequent, nor too illegible from being written in little 'pet hands.'
+ I can read any MS. except the writing on the pyramids. And if you will
+ only promise to treat me <i>en bon camarade</i>, without reference to the
+ conventionalities of 'ladies and gentlemen,' taking no thought for
+ your sentences (nor for mine), nor for your blots (nor for mine), nor
+ for your blunt speaking (nor for mine), nor for your badd speling (nor
+ for mine), and if you agree to send me a blotted thought whenever you
+ are in the mind for it, and with as little ceremony and less
+ legibility than you would think it necessary to employ towards your
+ printer&mdash;why, <i>then</i>, I am ready to sign and seal the contract, and to
+ rejoice in being 'articled' as your correspondent. Only <i>don't</i> let us
+ have any constraint, any ceremony! <i>Don't</i> be civil to me when you
+ feel rude,&mdash;nor loquacious when you incline to silence,&mdash;nor yielding
+ in the manners when you are perverse in the mind. See how out of the
+ world I am! Suffer me to profit by it in almost the only profitable
+ circumstance, and let us rest from the bowing and the courtesying,
+ you and I, on each side. You will find me an honest man on the whole,
+ if rather hasty and prejudging, which is a different thing from
+ prejudice at the worst. And we have great sympathies in common, and I
+ am inclined to look up to you in many things, and to learn as much of
+ everything as you will teach me. On the other hand you must prepare
+ yourself to forbear and to forgive&mdash;will you? While I throw off the
+ ceremony, I hold the faster to the kindness.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Is it true, as you say, that I 'know so "little"' of you? And is it
+ true, as others say, that the productions of an artist do not partake
+ of his real nature, ... that in the minor sense, man is not made in
+ the image of God? It is <i>not</i> true, to my mind&mdash;and therefore it is
+ not true that I know little of you, except in as far as it is true
+ (which I believe) that your greatest works are to come. Need I assure
+ you that I shall always hear with the deepest interest every word you
+ will say to me of what you are doing or about to do? I hear of the
+ 'old room' and the '"Bells" lying about,' with an interest which you
+ may guess at, perhaps. And when you tell me besides, of <i>my poems
+ being there</i>, and of your caring for them so much beyond the tide-mark
+ of my hopes, the pleasure rounds itself into a charm, and prevents its
+ own expression. Overjoyed I am with this cordial sympathy&mdash;but it is
+ better, I feel, to try to justify it by future work than to thank you
+ for it now. I think&mdash;if I may dare to name myself with you in the
+ poetic relation&mdash;that we both have high views of the Art we follow,
+ and stedfast purpose in the pursuit of it, and that we should not,
+ either of <i>us</i>, be likely to be thrown from the course, by the casting
+ of any Atalanta-ball of speedy popularity. But I do not know, I cannot
+ guess, whether you are liable to be pained deeply by hard criticism
+ and cold neglect, such as original writers like yourself are too often
+ exposed to&mdash;or whether the love of Art is enough for you, and the
+ exercise of Art the filling joy of your life. Not that praise must not
+ always, of necessity, be delightful to the artist, but that it may be
+ redundant to his content. Do you think so? or not? It appears to me
+ that poets who, like Keats, are highly susceptible to criticism, must
+ be jealous, in their own persons, of the future honour of their works.
+ Because, if a work is worthy, honour must follow it, though the worker
+ should not live to see that following overtaking. Now, is it not
+ enough that the work be honoured&mdash;enough I mean, for the worker? And
+ is it not enough to keep down a poet's ordinary wearing anxieties, to
+ think, that if his work be worthy it will have honour, and, if not,
+ that 'Sparta must have nobler sons than he'? I am writing nothing
+ applicable, I see, to anything in question, but when one falls into a
+ favourite train of thought, one indulges oneself in thinking on. I
+ began in thinking and wondering what sort of artistic constitution you
+ had, being determined, as you may observe (with a sarcastic smile at
+ the impertinence), to set about knowing as much as possible of you
+ immediately. Then you spoke of your 'gentle audience' (<i>you began</i>),
+ and I, who know that you have not one but many enthusiastic
+ admirers&mdash;the 'fit and few' in the intense meaning&mdash;yet not the
+ <i>diffused</i> fame which will come to you presently, wrote on, down the
+ margin of the subject, till I parted from it altogether. But, after
+ all, we are on the proper matter of sympathy. And after all, and after
+ all that has been said and mused upon the 'natural ills,' the anxiety,
+ and wearing out experienced by the true artist,&mdash;is not the <i>good</i>
+ immeasurably greater than the <i>evil</i>? Is it not great good, and great
+ joy? For my part, I wonder sometimes&mdash;I surprise myself wondering&mdash;how
+ without such an object and purpose of life, people find it worth while
+ to live at all. And, for happiness&mdash;why, my only idea of happiness, as
+ far as my personal enjoyment is concerned, (but I have been
+ straightened in some respects and in comparison with the majority of
+ livers!) lies deep in poetry and its associations. And then, the
+ escape from pangs of heart and bodily weakness&mdash;when you throw off
+ <i>yourself</i>&mdash;what you feel to be <i>yourself</i>&mdash;into another atmosphere
+ and into other relations where your life may spread its wings out new,
+ and gather on every separate plume a brightness from the sun of the
+ sun! Is it possible that imaginative writers should be so fond of
+ depreciating and lamenting over their own destiny? Possible,
+ certainly&mdash;but reasonable, not at all&mdash;and grateful, less than
+ anything!
+</p>
+<p>
+ My faults, my faults&mdash;Shall I help you? Ah&mdash;you see them too well, I
+ fear. And do you know that <i>I</i> also have something of your feeling
+ about 'being about to <i>begin</i>,' or I should dare to praise you for
+ having it. But in you, it is different&mdash;it is, in you, a virtue. When
+ Prometheus had recounted a long list of sorrows to be endured by Io, and
+ declared at last that he was <span title="mêdepô en prooimiois">&mu;&eta;&delta;&epsilon;&pi;&omega; &epsilon;&nu; &pi;&rho;&omicron;&omicron;&iota;&mu;&iota;&omicron;&iota;&sigmaf;</span>,<b><a href="#note-2">2</a></b>
+ poor Io burst out crying. And when the author of 'Paracelsus' and the
+ 'Bells and Pomegranates' says that he is only 'going to begin' we may
+ well (to take 'the opposite idea,' as you write) rejoice and clap our
+ hands. Yet I believe that, whatever you may have done, you <i>will</i> do
+ what is greater. It is my faith for you.
+</p>
+<p>
+ And how I should like to know what poets have been your sponsors, 'to
+ promise and vow' for you,&mdash;and whether you have held true to early
+ tastes, or leapt violently from them, and what books you read, and
+ what hours you write in. How curious I could prove myself!&mdash;(if it
+ isn't proved already).
+</p>
+<p>
+ But this is too much indeed, past all bearing, I suspect. Well, but if
+ I ever write to you again&mdash;I mean, if you wish it&mdash;it may be in the
+ other extreme of shortness. So do not take me for a born heroine of
+ Richardson, or think that I sin always to this length, else,&mdash;you
+ might indeed repent your quotation from Juliet&mdash;which I guessed at
+ once&mdash;and of course&mdash;
+</p>
+ <blockquote>
+ <blockquote>
+ <blockquote>
+ <blockquote>
+ <blockquote>
+ <blockquote>
+<p style="text-indent: 0em; margin-top: 0; margin-bottom: 0">
+ I have no joy in this contract to-day!<br>
+ It is too unadvised, too rash and sudden.
+</p>
+
+
+ </blockquote>
+ </blockquote>
+ </blockquote>
+ </blockquote>
+ </blockquote>
+ </blockquote>
+<p align="right" style="text-align: right">
+ Ever faithfully yours,&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
+</p>
+
+<p style="text-align: right">
+ <SPAN class="sc-ex">Elizabeth B. Barrett</span>. </p>
+<br>
+
+<h3><i>R.B. to E.B.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Hatcham, Tuesday.<br>
+ [Post-mark, February 11, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ Dear Miss Barrett,&mdash;People would hardly ever tell falsehoods about a
+ matter, if they had been let tell truth in the beginning, for it is
+ hard to prophane one's very self, and nobody who has, for instance,
+ used certain words and ways to a mother or a father <i>could</i>, even if
+ by the devil's help he <i>would</i>, reproduce or mimic them with any
+ effect to anybody else that was to be won over&mdash;and so, if 'I love
+ you' were always outspoken when it might be, there would, I suppose,
+ be no fear of its desecration at any after time. But lo! only last
+ night, I had to write, on the part of Mr. Carlyle, to a certain
+ ungainly, foolish gentleman who keeps back from him, with all the
+ fussy impotence of stupidity (not bad feeling, alas! for <i>that</i> we
+ could deal with) a certain MS. letter of Cromwell's which completes
+ the collection now going to press; and this long-ears had to be 'dear
+ Sir'd and obedient servanted' till I <i>said</i> (to use a mild word)
+ 'commend me to the sincerities of this kind of thing.'! When I spoke
+ of you knowing little of me, one of the senses in which I meant so was
+ this&mdash;that I would not well vowel-point my common-place letters and
+ syllables with a masoretic <i>other</i> sound and sense, make my 'dear'
+ something intenser than 'dears' in ordinary, and 'yours ever' a
+ thought more significant than the run of its like. And all this came
+ of your talking of 'tiring me,' 'being too envious,' &amp;c. &amp;c., which I
+ should never have heard of had the plain truth looked out of my letter
+ with its unmistakable eyes. <i>Now</i>, what you say of the 'bowing,' and
+ convention that is to be, and <i>tant de façons</i> that are not to be,
+ helps me once and for ever&mdash;for have I not a right to say simply that,
+ for reasons I know, for other reasons I don't exactly know, but might
+ if I chose to think a little, and for still other reasons, which, most
+ likely, all the choosing and thinking in the world would not make me
+ know, I had rather hear from you than see anybody else. Never you
+ care, dear noble Carlyle, nor you, my own friend Alfred over the sea,
+ nor a troop of true lovers!&mdash;Are not their fates written? there! Don't
+ you answer this, please, but, mind it is on record, and now then, with
+ a lighter conscience I shall begin replying to your questions. But
+ then&mdash;what I have printed gives <i>no</i> knowledge of me&mdash;it evidences
+ abilities of various kinds, if you will&mdash;and a dramatic sympathy with
+ certain modifications of passion ... <i>that</i> I think&mdash;But I never have
+ begun, even, what I hope I was born to begin and end&mdash;'R.B. a
+ poem'&mdash;and next, if I speak (and, God knows, feel), as if what you
+ have read were sadly imperfect demonstrations of even mere ability, it
+ is from no absurd vanity, though it might seem so&mdash;these scenes and
+ song-scraps <i>are</i> such mere and very escapes of my inner power, which
+ lives in me like the light in those crazy Mediterranean phares I have
+ watched at sea, wherein the light is ever revolving in a dark gallery,
+ bright and alive, and only after a weary interval leaps out, for a
+ moment, from the one narrow chink, and then goes on with the blind
+ wall between it and you; and, no doubt, <i>then</i>, precisely, does the
+ poor drudge that carries the cresset set himself most busily to trim
+ the wick&mdash;for don't think I want to say I have not worked hard&mdash;(this
+ head of mine knows better)&mdash;but the work has been <i>inside</i>, and not
+ when at stated times I held up my light to you&mdash;and, that there is no
+ self-delusion here, I would prove to you (and nobody else), even by
+ opening this desk I write on, and showing what stuff, in the way of
+ wood, I <i>could</i> make a great bonfire with, if I might only knock the
+ whole clumsy top off my tower! Of course, every writing body says the
+ same, so I gain nothing by the avowal; but when I remember how I have
+ done what was published, and half done what may never be, I say with
+ some right, you can know but little of me. Still, I <i>hope</i> sometimes,
+ though phrenologists will have it that I <i>cannot</i>, and am doing
+ better with this darling 'Luria'&mdash;so safe in my head, and a tiny slip
+ of paper I cover with my thumb!
+</p>
+<p>
+ Then you inquire about my 'sensitiveness to criticism,' and I shall be
+ glad to tell you exactly, because I have, more than once, taken a
+ course you might else not understand. I shall live always&mdash;that is for
+ me&mdash;I am living here this 1845, that is for London. I write from a
+ thorough conviction that it is the duty of me, and with the belief
+ that, after every drawback and shortcoming, I do my best, all things
+ considered&mdash;that is for <i>me</i>, and, so being, the not being listened to
+ by one human creature would, I hope, in nowise affect me. But of
+ course I must, if for merely scientific purposes, know all about this
+ 1845, its ways and doings, and something I do know, as that for a
+ dozen cabbages, if I pleased to grow them in the garden here, I might
+ demand, say, a dozen pence at Covent Garden Market,&mdash;and that for a
+ dozen scenes, of the average goodness, I may challenge as many
+ plaudits at the theatre close by; and a dozen pages of verse, brought
+ to the Rialto where verse-merchants most do congregate, ought to bring
+ me a fair proportion of the Reviewers' gold currency, seeing the other
+ traders pouch their winnings, as I do see. Well, when they won't pay
+ me for my cabbages, nor praise me for my poems, I may, if I please,
+ say 'more's the shame,' and bid both parties 'decamp to the crows,' in
+ Greek phrase, and <i>yet</i> go very lighthearted back to a garden-full of
+ rose-trees, and a soul-full of comforts. If they had bought my greens
+ I should have been able to buy the last number of <i>Punch</i>, and go
+ through the toll-gate of Waterloo Bridge, and give the blind
+ clarionet-player a trifle, and all without changing my gold. If they
+ had taken to my books, my father and mother would have been proud of
+ this and the other 'favourable critique,' and&mdash;at least so folks
+ hold&mdash;I should have to pay Mr. Moxon less by a few pounds,
+ whereas&mdash;but you see! Indeed I force myself to say ever and anon, in
+ the interest of the market-gardeners regular, and Keatses proper,
+ 'It's nothing to <i>you</i>, critics, hucksters, all of you, if I <i>have</i>
+ this garden and this conscience&mdash;I might go die at Rome, or take to
+ gin and the newspaper, for what <i>you</i> would care!' So I don't quite
+ lay open my resources to everybody. But it does so happen, that I have
+ met with much more than I could have expected in this matter of kindly
+ and prompt recognition. I never wanted a real set of good hearty
+ praisers&mdash;and no bad reviewers&mdash;I am quite content with my share.
+ No&mdash;what I laughed at in my 'gentle audience' is a sad trick the real
+ admirers have of admiring at the wrong place&mdash;enough to make an
+ apostle swear. <i>That</i> does make me savage&mdash;<i>never</i> the other kind of
+ people; why, think now&mdash;take your own 'Drama of Exile' and let <i>me</i>
+ send it to the first twenty men and women that shall knock at your
+ door to-day and after&mdash;of whom the first five are the Postman, the
+ seller of cheap sealing-wax, Mr. Hawkins Junr, the Butcher for orders,
+ and the Tax-gatherer&mdash;will you let me, by Cornelius Agrippa's
+ assistance, force these five and these fellows to read, and report on,
+ this 'Drama'&mdash;and, when I have put these faithful reports into fair
+ English, do you believe they would be better than, if as good, as, the
+ general run of Periodical criticisms? Not they, I will venture to
+ affirm. But then&mdash;once again, I get these people together and give
+ them your book, and persuade them, moreover, that by praising it, the
+ Postman will be helping its author to divide Long Acre into two beats,
+ one of which she will take with half the salary and all the red
+ collar,&mdash;that a sealing-wax vendor will see red wafers brought into
+ vogue, and so on with the rest&mdash;and won't you just wish for your
+ <i>Spectators</i> and <i>Observers</i> and Newcastle-upon-Tyne&mdash;Hebdomadal
+ <i>Mercuries</i> back again! You see the inference&mdash;I do sincerely esteem
+ it a perfectly providential and miraculous thing that they are so
+ well-behaved in ordinary, these critics; and for Keats and Tennyson to
+ 'go softly all their days' for a gruff word or two is quite
+ inexplicable to me, and always has been. Tennyson reads the
+ <i>Quarterly</i> and does as they bid him, with the most solemn face in the
+ world&mdash;out goes this, in goes that, all is changed and ranged. Oh me!
+</p>
+<p>
+ Out comes the sun, in comes the <i>Times</i> and eleven strikes (it <i>does</i>)
+ already, and I have to go to Town, and I have no alternative but that
+ this story of the Critic and Poet, 'the Bear and the Fiddle,' should
+ 'begin but break off in the middle'; yet I doubt&mdash;nor will you
+ henceforth, I know, say, 'I vex you, I am sure, by this lengthy
+ writing.' Mind that spring is coming, for all this snow; and know me
+ for yours ever faithfully,
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right"><SPAN class="sc-ex">R. Browning</span>.
+</p>
+<p>
+ I don't dare&mdash;yet I will&mdash;ask <i>can</i> you read this? Because I <i>could</i>
+ write a little better, but not so fast. Do you keep writing just as
+ you do now!
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3>
+ <i>E.B.B. to R.B.</i>
+</h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">50 Wimpole Street, February 17, 1845.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Dear Mr. Browning,&mdash;To begin with the end (which is only
+ characteristic of the perverse like myself), I assure you I read your
+ handwriting as currently as I could read the clearest type from font.
+ If I had practised the art of reading your letters all my life, I
+ couldn't do it better. And then I approve of small MS. upon principle.
+ Think of what an immense quantity of physical energy must go to the
+ making of those immense sweeping handwritings achieved by some persons
+ ... Mr. Landor, for instance, who writes as if he had the sky for a
+ copybook and dotted his <i>i</i>'s in proportion. People who do such things
+ should wear gauntlets; yes, and have none to wear; or they wouldn't
+ waste their time so. People who write&mdash;by profession&mdash;shall I
+ say?&mdash;never should do it, or what will become of them when most of
+ their strength retires into their head and heart, (as is the case with
+ some of us and may be the case with all) and when they have to write a
+ poem twelve times over, as Mr. Kenyon says I should do if I were
+ virtuous? Not that I do it. Does anybody do it, I wonder? Do <i>you</i>,
+ ever? From what you tell me of the trimming of the light, I imagine
+ not. And besides, one may be laborious as a writer, without copying
+ twelve times over. I believe there are people who will tell you in a
+ moment what three times six is, without 'doing it' on their fingers;
+ and in the same way one may work one's verses in one's head quite as
+ laboriously as on paper&mdash;I maintain it. I consider myself a very
+ patient, laborious writer&mdash;though dear Mr. Kenyon laughs me to scorn
+ when I say so. And just see how it could be otherwise. If I were
+ netting a purse I might be thinking of something else and drop my
+ stitches; or even if I were writing verses to please a popular taste,
+ I might be careless in it. But the pursuit of an Ideal acknowledged by
+ the mind, <i>will</i> draw and concentrate the powers of the mind&mdash;and Art,
+ you know, is a jealous god and demands the whole man&mdash;or woman. I
+ cannot conceive of a sincere artist who is also a careless one&mdash;though
+ one may have a quicker hand than another, in general,&mdash;and though all
+ are liable to vicissitudes in the degree of facility&mdash;and to
+ entanglements in the machinery, notwithstanding every degree of
+ facility. You may write twenty lines one day&mdash;or even three like
+ Euripides in three days&mdash;and a hundred lines in one more day&mdash;and yet
+ on the hundred, may have been expended as much good work, as on the
+ twenty and the three. And also, as you say, the lamp is trimmed behind
+ the wall&mdash;and the act of utterance is the evidence of foregone study
+ still more than it is the occasion to study. The deep interest with
+ which I read all that you had the kindness to write to me of yourself,
+ you must trust me for, as I find it hard to express it. It is sympathy
+ in one way, and interest every way! And now, see! Although you proved
+ to me with admirable logic that, for reasons which you know and
+ reasons which you don't know, I couldn't possibly know anything about
+ you; though that is all true&mdash;and proven (which is better than
+ true)&mdash;I really did understand of you before I was told, exactly what
+ you told me. Yes, I did indeed. I felt sure that as a poet you fronted
+ the future&mdash;and that your chief works, in your own apprehension, were
+ to come. Oh&mdash;I take no credit of sagacity for it; as I did not long
+ ago to my sisters and brothers, when I professed to have knowledge of
+ all their friends whom I never saw in my life, by the image coming
+ with the name; and threw them into shouts of laughter by giving out
+ all the blue eyes and black eyes and hazel eyes and noses Roman and
+ Gothic ticketed aright for the Mr. Smiths and Miss Hawkinses,&mdash;and hit
+ the bull's eye and the true features of the case, ten times out of
+ twelve! But <i>you</i> are different. <i>You</i> are to be made out by the
+ comparative anatomy system. You have thrown out fragments of <i>os</i> ...
+ <i>sublime</i> ... indicative of soul-mammothism&mdash;and you live to develop
+ your nature,&mdash;<i>if</i> you live. That is easy and plain. You have taken a
+ great range&mdash;from those high faint notes of the mystics which are
+ beyond personality ... to dramatic impersonations, gruff with nature,
+ 'gr-r-r- you swine'; and when these are thrown into harmony, as in a
+ manner they are in 'Pippa Passes' (which I could find in my heart to
+ covet the authorship of, more than any of your works&mdash;), the
+ combinations of effect must always be striking and noble&mdash;and you must
+ feel yourself drawn on to such combinations more and more. But I do
+ not, you say, know yourself&mdash;you. I only know abilities and faculties.
+ Well, then, teach me yourself&mdash;you. I will not insist on the
+ knowledge&mdash;and, in fact, you have not written the R.B. poem yet&mdash;your
+ rays fall obliquely rather than directly straight. I see you only in
+ your moon. Do tell me all of yourself that you can and will ... before
+ the R.B. poem comes out. And what is 'Luria'? A poem and not a drama?
+ I mean, a poem not in the dramatic form? Well! I have wondered at you
+ sometimes, not for daring, but for bearing to trust your noble works
+ into the great mill of the 'rank, popular' playhouse, to be ground to
+ pieces between the teeth of vulgar actors and actresses. I, for one,
+ would as soon have 'my soul among lions.' 'There is a fascination in
+ it,' says Miss Mitford, and I am sure there must be, to account for
+ it. Publics in the mass are bad enough; but to distil the dregs of the
+ public and baptise oneself in that acrid moisture, where can be the
+ temptation? I could swear by Shakespeare, as was once sworn 'by those
+ dead at Marathon,' that I do not see where. I love the drama too. I
+ look to our old dramatists as to our Kings and princes in poetry. I
+ love them through all the deeps of their abominations. But the theatre
+ in those days was a better medium between the people and the poet; and
+ the press in those days was a less sufficient medium than now. Still,
+ the poet suffered by the theatre even then; and the reasons are very
+ obvious.
+</p>
+<p>
+ How true&mdash;how true ... is all you say about critics. My convictions
+ follow you in every word. And I delighted to read your views of the
+ poet's right aspect towards criticism&mdash;I read them with the most
+ complete appreciation and sympathy. I have sometimes thought that it
+ would be a curious and instructive process, as illustrative of the
+ wisdom and apprehensiveness of critics, if anyone would collect the
+ critical soliloquies of every age touching its own literature, (as far
+ as such may be extant) and <i>confer</i> them with the literary product of
+ the said ages. Professor Wilson has begun something of the kind
+ apparently, in his initiatory paper of the last <i>Blackwood</i> number on
+ critics, beginning with Dryden&mdash;but he seems to have no design in his
+ notice&mdash;it is a mere critique on the critic. And then, he should have
+ begun earlier than Dryden&mdash;earlier even than Sir Philip Sydney, who in
+ the noble 'Discourse on Poetry,' gives such singular evidence of being
+ stone-critic-blind to the gods who moved around him. As far as I can
+ remember, he saw even Shakespeare but indifferently. Oh, it was in his
+ eyes quite an unillumed age, that period of Elizabeth which <i>we</i> see
+ full of suns! and few can see what is close to the eyes though they
+ run their heads against it; the denial of contemporary genius is the
+ rule rather than the exception. No one counts the eagles in the nest,
+ till there is a rush of wings; and lo! they are flown. And here we
+ speak of understanding men, such as the Sydneys and the Drydens. Of
+ the great body of critics you observe rightly, that they are better
+ than might be expected of their badness, only the fact of their
+ <i>influence</i> is no less undeniable than the reason why they should not
+ be influential. The brazen kettles will be taken for oracles all the
+ world over. But the influence is for to-day, for this hour&mdash;not for
+ to-morrow and the day after&mdash;unless indeed, as you say, the poet do
+ himself perpetuate the influence by submitting to it. Do you know
+ Tennyson?&mdash;that is, with a face to face knowledge? I have great
+ admiration for him. In execution, he is exquisite,&mdash;and, in music, a
+ most subtle weigher out to the ear of fine airs. That such a poet
+ should submit blindly to the suggestions of his critics, (I do not say
+ that suggestions from without may not be accepted with discrimination
+ sometimes, to the benefit of the acceptor), blindly and implicitly to
+ the suggestions of his critics, is much as if Babbage were to take my
+ opinion and undo his calculating machine by it. Napoleon called poetry
+ <i>science creuse</i>&mdash;which, although he was not scientific in poetry
+ himself, is true enough. But anybody is qualified, according to
+ everybody, for giving opinions upon poetry. It is not so in chymistry
+ and mathematics. Nor is it so, I believe, in whist and the polka. But
+ then these are more serious things.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Yes&mdash;and it does delight me to hear of your garden full of roses and
+ soul full of comforts! You have the right to both&mdash;you have the key to
+ both. You have written enough to live by, though only beginning to
+ write, as you say of yourself. And this reminds me to remind you that
+ when I talked of coveting most the authorship of your 'Pippa,' I did
+ not mean to call it your finest work (you might reproach me for
+ <i>that</i>), but just to express a personal feeling. Do you know what it
+ is to covet your neighbour's poetry?&mdash;not his fame, but his poetry?&mdash;I
+ dare say not. You are too generous. And, in fact, beauty is beauty,
+ and, whether it comes by our own hand or another's, blessed be the
+ coming of it! <i>I</i>, besides, feel <i>that</i>. And yet&mdash;and yet, I have been
+ aware of a feeling within me which has spoken two or three times to
+ the effect of a wish, that I had been visited with the vision of
+ 'Pippa,' before you&mdash;and <i>confiteor tibi</i>&mdash;I confess the baseness of
+ it. The conception is, to my mind, most exquisite and altogether
+ original&mdash;and the contrast in the working out of the plan, singularly
+ expressive of various faculty.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Is the poem under your thumb, emerging from it? and in what metre? May
+ I ask such questions?
+</p>
+<p>
+ And does Mr. Carlyle tell you that he has forbidden all 'singing' to
+ this perverse and froward generation, which should work and not sing?
+ And have you told Mr. Carlyle that song is work, and also the
+ condition of work? I am a devout sitter at his feet&mdash;and it is an
+ effort to me to think him wrong in anything&mdash;and once when he told me
+ to write prose and not verse, I fancied that his opinion was I had
+ mistaken my calling,&mdash;a fancy which in infinite kindness and
+ gentleness he stooped immediately to correct. I never shall forget the
+ grace of that kindness&mdash;but then! For <i>him</i> to have thought ill of
+ <i>me</i>, would not have been strange&mdash;I often think ill of myself, as God
+ knows. But for Carlyle to think of putting away, even for a season,
+ the poetry of the world, was wonderful, and has left me ruffled in my
+ thoughts ever since. I do not know him personally at all. But as his
+ disciple I ventured (by an exceptional motive) to send him my poems,
+ and I heard from him as a consequence. 'Dear and noble' he is
+ indeed&mdash;and a poet unaware of himself; all but the sense of music. You
+ feel it so&mdash;do you not? And the 'dear sir' has let him have the
+ 'letter of Cromwell,' I hope; and satisfied 'the obedient servant.'
+ The curious thing in this world is not the stupidity, but the
+ upper-handism of the stupidity. The geese are in the Capitol, and the
+ Romans in the farmyard&mdash;and it seems all quite natural that it should
+ be so, both to geese and Romans!
+</p>
+<p>
+ But there are things you say, which seem to me supernatural, for
+ reasons which I know and for reasons which I don't know. You will let
+ me be grateful to you,&mdash;will you not? You must, if you will or not.
+ And also&mdash;I would not wait for more leave&mdash;if I could but see your
+ desk&mdash;as I do your death's heads and the spider-webs appertaining; but
+ the soul of Cornelius Agrippa fades from me.
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">Ever faithfully yours,&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">
+<SPAN class="sc-ex">Elizabeth B. Barrett</span>.</p>
+<br>
+<h3>
+ <i>R.B. to E.B.B.</i>
+</h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Wednesday Morning&mdash;Spring!<br>
+[Post-mark, February 26, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ Real warm Spring, dear Miss Barrett, and the birds know it; and in
+ Spring I shall see you, surely see you&mdash;for when did I once fail to
+ get whatever I had set my heart upon? As I ask myself sometimes, with
+ a strange fear.
+</p>
+<p>
+ I took up this paper to write a great deal&mdash;now, I don't think I shall
+ write much&mdash;'I shall see you,' I say!
+</p>
+<p>
+ That 'Luria' you enquire about, shall be my last play&mdash;for it is but a
+ play, woe's me! I have one done here, 'A Soul's Tragedy,' as it is
+ properly enough called, but <i>that</i> would not do to end with (end I
+ will), and Luria is a Moor, of Othello's country, and devotes himself
+ to something he thinks Florence, and the old fortune follows&mdash;all in
+ my brain yet, but the bright weather helps and I will soon loosen my
+ Braccio and Puccio (a pale discontented man), and Tiburzio (the Pisan,
+ good true fellow, this one), and Domizia the Lady&mdash;loosen all these on
+ dear foolish (ravishing must his folly be), golden-hearted Luria, all
+ these with their worldly-wisdom and Tuscan shrewd ways; and, for me,
+ the misfortune is, I sympathise just as much with these as with
+ him,&mdash;so there can no good come of keeping this wild company any
+ longer, and 'Luria' and the other sadder ruin of one Chiappino&mdash;these
+ got rid of, I will do as you bid me, and&mdash;say first I have some
+ Romances and Lyrics, all dramatic, to dispatch, and <i>then</i>, I shall
+ stoop of a sudden under and out of this dancing ring of men and women
+ hand in hand, and stand still awhile, should my eyes dazzle, and when
+ that's over, they will be gone and you will be there, <i>pas vrai</i>? For,
+ as I think I told you, I always shiver involuntarily when I look&mdash;no,
+ glance&mdash;at this First Poem of mine to be. '<i>Now</i>,' I call it, what,
+ upon my soul,&mdash;for a solemn matter it is,&mdash;what is to be done <i>now</i>,
+ believed <i>now</i>, so far as it has been revealed to me&mdash;solemn words,
+ truly&mdash;and to find myself writing them to any one else! Enough now.
+</p>
+<p>
+ I know Tennyson 'face to face,'&mdash;no more than that. I know Carlyle and
+ love him&mdash;know him so well, that I would have told you he had shaken
+ that grand head of his at 'singing,' so thoroughly does he love and
+ live by it. When I last saw him, a fortnight ago, he turned, from I
+ don't know what other talk, quite abruptly on me with, 'Did you never
+ try to write a <i>Song</i>? Of all things in the world, <i>that</i> I should be
+ proudest to do.' Then came his definition of a song&mdash;then, with an
+ appealing look to Mrs. C., 'I always say that some day in <i>spite of
+ nature and my stars</i>, I shall burst into a song' (he is not
+ mechanically 'musical,' he meant, and the music is the poetry, he
+ holds, and should enwrap the thought as Donne says 'an amber-drop
+ enwraps a bee'), and then he began to recite an old Scotch song,
+ stopping at the first rude couplet, 'The beginning words are merely to
+ set the tune, they tell me'&mdash;and then again at the couplet about&mdash;or,
+ to the effect that&mdash;'give me' (but in broad Scotch) 'give me but my
+ lass, I care not for my cogie.' '<i>He says</i>,' quoth Carlyle
+ magisterially, 'that if you allow him the love of his lass, you may
+ take away all else, even his cogie, his cup or can, and he cares not,'
+ just as a professor expounds Lycophron. And just before I left
+ England, six months ago, did not I hear him croon, if not certainly
+ sing, 'Charlie is my darling' ('my <i>darling</i>' with an adoring
+ emphasis), and then he stood back, as it were, from the song, to look
+ at it better, and said 'How must that notion of ideal wondrous
+ perfection have impressed itself in this old Jacobite's "young
+ Cavalier"&mdash;("They go to save their land, and the <i>young
+ Cavalier</i>!!")&mdash;when I who care nothing about such a rag of a man,
+ cannot but feel as he felt, in speaking his words after him!' After
+ saying which, he would be sure to counsel everybody to get their heads
+ clear of all singing! Don't let me forget to clap hands, we got the
+ letter, dearly bought as it was by the 'Dear Sirs,' &amp;c., and
+ insignificant scrap as it proved, but still it is got, to my
+ encouragement in diplomacy.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Who told you of my sculls and spider webs&mdash;Horne? Last year I petted
+ extraordinarily a fine fellow, (a <i>garden</i> spider&mdash;there was the
+ singularity,&mdash;the thin clever-even-for-a-spider-sort, and they are
+ <i>so</i> 'spirited and sly,' all of them&mdash;this kind makes a long cone of
+ web, with a square chamber of vantage at the end, and there he sits
+ loosely and looks about), a great fellow that housed himself, with
+ real gusto, in the jaws of a great scull, whence he watched me as I
+ wrote, and I remember speaking to Horne about his good points.
+ Phrenologists look gravely at that great scull, by the way, and hope,
+ in their grim manner, that its owner made a good end. He looks
+ quietly, now, out at the green little hill behind. I have no little
+ insight to the feelings of furniture, and treat books and prints with
+ a reasonable consideration. How some people use their pictures, for
+ instance, is a mystery to me; very revolting all the same&mdash;portraits
+ obliged to face each other for ever,&mdash;prints put together in
+ portfolios. My Polidoro's perfect Andromeda along with 'Boors
+ Carousing,' by Ostade,&mdash;where I found her,&mdash;my own father's doing, or
+ I would say more.
+</p>
+<p>
+ And when I have said I like 'Pippa' better than anything else I have
+ done yet, I shall have answered all you bade me. And now may <i>I</i>
+ begin questioning? No,&mdash;for it is all a pure delight to me, so that
+ you do but write. I never was without good, kind, generous friends and
+ lovers, so they say&mdash;so they were and are,&mdash;perhaps they came at the
+ wrong time&mdash;I never wanted them&mdash;though that makes no difference in my
+ gratitude I trust,&mdash;but I know myself&mdash;surely&mdash;and always have done
+ so, for is there not somewhere the little book I first printed when a
+ boy, with John Mill, the metaphysical head, <i>his</i> marginal note that
+ 'the writer possesses a deeper self-consciousness than I ever knew in
+ a sane human being.' So I never deceived myself much, nor called my
+ feelings for people other than they were. And who has a right to say,
+ if I have not, that I had, but I said that, supernatural or no. Pray
+ tell me, too, of your present doings and projects, and never write
+ yourself 'grateful' to me, who <i>am</i> grateful, very grateful to
+ you,&mdash;for none of your words but I take in earnest&mdash;and tell me if
+ Spring <i>be not</i> coming, come, and I will take to writing the gravest
+ of letters, because this beginning is for gladness' sake, like
+ Carlyle's song couplet. My head aches a little to-day too, and, as
+ poor dear Kirke White said to the moon, from his heap of mathematical
+ papers,
+</p>
+<blockquote><blockquote><blockquote><blockquote><blockquote><blockquote><p style="text-indent: 0em; margin-top: 0; margin-bottom: 0">'I throw aside the learned sheet;<br>
+I cannot choose but gaze, she looks so&mdash;mildly sweet.'
+</p>
+</blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><p>
+ Out on the foolish phrase, but there's hard rhyming without it.
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">Ever yours faithfully,&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right"><SPAN class="sc-ex">Robert Browning</span>.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3>
+ <i>E.B.B. to R.B.</i>
+</h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">50 Wimpole Street: Feb. 27, 1845.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Yes, but, dear Mr. Browning, I want the spring according to the new
+ 'style' (mine), and not the old one of you and the rest of the poets.
+ To me unhappily, the snowdrop is much the same as the snow&mdash;it feels
+ as cold underfoot&mdash;and I have grown sceptical about 'the voice of the
+ turtle,' the east winds blow so loud. April is a Parthian with a dart,
+ and May (at least the early part of it) a spy in the camp. <i>That</i> is
+ my idea of what you call spring; mine, in the <i>new style</i>! A little
+ later comes my spring; and indeed after such severe weather, from
+ which I have just escaped with my life, I may thank it for coming at
+ all. How happy you are, to be able to listen to the 'birds' without
+ the commentary of the east wind, which, like other commentaries,
+ spoils the music. And how happy I am to listen to you, when you write
+ such kind open-hearted letters to me! I am delighted to hear all you
+ say to me of yourself, and 'Luria,' and the spider, and to do him no
+ dishonour in the association, of the great teacher of the age,
+ Carlyle, who is also yours and mine. He fills the office of a
+ poet&mdash;does he not?&mdash;by analysing humanity back into its elements, to
+ the destruction of the conventions of the hour. That is&mdash;strictly
+ speaking&mdash;the office of the poet, is it not?&mdash;and he discharges it
+ fully, and with a wider intelligibility perhaps as far as the
+ contemporary period is concerned, than if he did forthwith 'burst into
+ a song.'
+</p>
+<p>
+ But how I do wander!&mdash;I meant to say, and I will call myself back to
+ say, that spring will really come some day I hope and believe, and the
+ warm settled weather with it, and that then I shall be probably fitter
+ for certain pleasures than I can appear even to myself now.
+</p>
+<p>
+ And, in the meantime, I seem to see 'Luria' instead of you; I have
+ visions and dream dreams. And the 'Soul's Tragedy,' which sounds to me
+ like the step of a ghost of an old Drama! and you are not to think
+ that I blaspheme the Drama, dear Mr. Browning; or that I ever thought
+ of exhorting you to give up the 'solemn robes' and tread of the
+ buskin. It is the theatre which vulgarises these things; the modern
+ theatre in which we see no altar! where the thymelé is replaced by the
+ caprice of a popular actor. And also, I have a fancy that your great
+ dramatic power would work more clearly and audibly in the less
+ definite mould&mdash;but you ride your own faculty as Oceanus did his
+ sea-horse, 'directing it by your will'; and woe to the impertinence,
+ which would dare to say 'turn this way' or 'turn from that way'&mdash;it
+ should not be <i>my</i> impertinence. Do not think I blaspheme the Drama. I
+ have gone through 'all such reading as should never be read' (that is,
+ by women!), through my love of it on the contrary. And the dramatic
+ faculty is strong in you&mdash;and therefore, as 'I speak unto a wise man,
+ judge what I say.'
+</p>
+<p>
+ For myself and my own doings, you shall hear directly what I have been
+ doing, and what I am about to do. Some years ago, as perhaps you may
+ have heard, (but I hope not, for the fewer who hear of it the
+ better)&mdash;some years ago, I translated or rather <i>undid</i> into English,
+ the 'Prometheus' of Æschylus. To speak of this production moderately
+ (not modestly), it is the most miserable of all miserable versions of
+ the class. It was completed (in the first place) in thirteen days&mdash;the
+ iambics thrown into blank verse, the lyrics into rhymed octosyllabics
+ and the like,&mdash;and the whole together as cold as Caucasus, and as flat
+ as the nearest plain. To account for this, the haste may be something;
+ but if my mind had been properly awakened at the time, I might have
+ made still more haste and done it better. Well,&mdash;the comfort is, that
+ the little book was unadvertised and unknown, and that most of the
+ copies (through my entreaty of my father) are shut up in the wardrobe
+ of his bedroom. If ever I get well I shall show my joy by making a
+ bonfire of them. In the meantime, the recollection of this sin of mine
+ has been my nightmare and daymare too, and the sin has been the 'Blot
+ on my escutcheon.' I could look in nobody's face, with a 'Thou canst
+ not say I did it'&mdash;I know, I did it. And so I resolved to wash away
+ the transgression, and translate the tragedy over again. It was an
+ honest straightforward proof of repentance&mdash;was it not? and I have
+ completed it, except the transcription and last polishing. If
+ Æschylus stands at the foot of my bed now, I shall have a little
+ breath to front him. I have done my duty by him, not indeed according
+ to his claims, but in proportion to my faculty. Whether I shall ever
+ publish or not (remember) remains to be considered&mdash;that is a
+ different side of the subject. If I do, it <i>may</i> be in a
+ magazine&mdash;or&mdash;but this is another ground. And then, I have in my head
+ to associate with the version, a monodrama of my own,&mdash;not a long
+ poem, but a monologue of Æschylus as he sate a blind exile on the
+ flats of Sicily and recounted the past to his own soul, just before
+ the eagle cracked his great massy skull with a stone.
+</p>
+<p>
+ But my chief <i>intention</i> just now is the writing of a sort of
+ novel-poem&mdash;a poem as completely modern as 'Geraldine's Courtship,'
+ running into the midst of our conventions, and rushing into
+ drawing-rooms and the like, 'where angels fear to tread'; and so,
+ meeting face to face and without mask the Humanity of the age, and
+ speaking the truth as I conceive of it out plainly. That is my
+ intention. It is not mature enough yet to be called a plan. I am
+ waiting for a story, and I won't take one, because I want to make one,
+ and I like to make my own stories, because then I can take liberties
+ with them in the treatment.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Who told me of your skulls and spiders? Why, couldn't I know it
+ without being told? Did Cornelius Agrippa know nothing without being
+ told? Mr. Horne never spoke it to my ears&mdash;(I never saw him face to
+ face in my life, although we have corresponded for long and long), and
+ he never wrote it to my eyes. Perhaps he does not know that I know it.
+ Well, then! if I were to say that <i>I heard it from you yourself</i>, how
+ would you answer? <i>And it was so.</i> Why, are you not aware that these
+ are the days of mesmerism and clairvoyance? Are you an infidel? I have
+ believed in your skulls for the last year, for my part.
+</p>
+<p>
+ And I have some sympathy in your habit of feeling for chairs and
+ tables. I remember, when I was a child and wrote poems in little
+ clasped books, I used to kiss the books and put them away tenderly
+ because I had been happy near them, and take them out by turns when I
+ was going from home, to cheer them by the change of air and the
+ pleasure of the new place. This, not for the sake of the verses
+ written in them, and not for the sake of writing more verses in them,
+ but from pure gratitude. Other books I used to treat in a like
+ manner&mdash;and to talk to the trees and the flowers, was a natural
+ inclination&mdash;but between me and that time, the cypresses grow thick
+ and dark.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Is it true that your wishes fulfil themselves? And when they <i>do</i>, are
+ they not bitter to your taste&mdash;do you not wish them <i>un</i>fulfilled? Oh,
+ this life, this life! There is comfort in it, they say, and I almost
+ believe&mdash;but the brightest place in the house, is the leaning out of
+ the window&mdash;at least, for me.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Of course you are <i>self-conscious</i>&mdash;How could you be a poet otherwise?
+ Tell me.
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">Ever faithfully yours,
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">
+E.B.B.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+ And was the little book written with Mr. Mill, pure metaphysics, or
+ what?
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3>
+ <i>R.B. to E.B.B.</i>
+</h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Saturday Night, March 1 [1845].
+</p>
+<p>
+ Dear Miss Barrett,&mdash;I seem to find of a sudden&mdash;surely I knew
+ before&mdash;anyhow, I <i>do</i> find now, that with the octaves on octaves of
+ quite new golden strings you enlarged the compass of my life's harp
+ with, there is added, too, such a tragic chord, that which you
+ touched, so gently, in the beginning of your letter I got this
+ morning, 'just escaping' &amp;c. But if my truest heart's wishes avail, as
+ they have hitherto done, you shall laugh at East winds yet, as I do!
+ See now, this sad feeling is so strange to me, that I must write it
+ out, <i>must</i>, and you might give me great, the greatest pleasure for
+ years and yet find me as passive as a stone used to wine libations,
+ and as ready in expressing my sense of them, but when I am pained, I
+ find the old theory of the uselessness of communicating the
+ circumstances of it, singularly untenable. I have been 'spoiled' in
+ this world&mdash;to such an extent, indeed, that I often <i>reason</i> out&mdash;make
+ clear to myself&mdash;that I might very properly, so far as myself am
+ concerned, take any step that would peril the whole of my future
+ happiness&mdash;because the past is gained, secure, and on record; and,
+ though not another of the old days should dawn on me, I shall not have
+ lost my life, no! Out of all which you are&mdash;please&mdash;to make a sort of
+ sense, if you can, so as to express that I have been deeply struck to
+ find a new real unmistakable sorrow along with these as real but not
+ so new joys you have given me. How strangely this connects itself in
+ my mind with another subject in your note! I looked at that
+ translation for a minute, not longer, years ago, knowing nothing about
+ it or you, and I <i>only</i> looked to see what rendering a passage had
+ received that was often in my thoughts.<a href="#note-3"><b><u>3</u></b></a> I forget your version (it
+ was not <i>yours</i>, my <i>'yours' then</i>; I mean I had no extraordinary
+ interest about it), but the original makes Prometheus (telling over
+ his bestowments towards human happiness) say, as something <span title="peraiterô tônde">&pi;&epsilon;&rho;&alpha;&iota;&tau;&epsilon;&rho;&omega; &tau;&omega;&nu;&delta;&epsilon;</span>,
+ that he stopped mortals <span title="mê proderkesthai moron--to poion eurôn">&mu;&eta; &pi;&rho;&omicron;&delta;&epsilon;&rho;&kappa;&epsilon;&sigma;&theta;&alpha;&iota; &mu;&omicron;&rho;&omicron;&nu;&mdash;&tau;&omicron; &pi;&omicron;&iota;&omicron;&nu; &epsilon;&upsilon;&rho;&omega;&nu;</span>, asks the Chorus,
+ <span title="têsde pharmakon nosou">&tau;&eta;&sigma;&delta;&epsilon; &phi;&alpha;&rho;&mu;&alpha;&kappa;&omicron;&nu; &nu;&omicron;&sigma;&omicron;&upsilon;</span>?
+ Whereto he replies, <span title="tuphlas en autois elpidas katôkisa">
+ &tau;&upsilon;&phi;&lambda;&alpha;&sigmaf; &epsilon;&nu; &alpha;&upsilon;&tau;&omicron;&iota;&sigmaf; &epsilon;&lambda;&pi;&iota;&delta;&alpha;&sigmaf; &kappa;&alpha;&tau;&omega;&kappa;&iota;&sigma;&alpha;</span>
+ (what you hear men dissertate upon by the hour, as proving
+ the immortality of the soul apart from revelation, undying yearnings,
+ restless longings, instinctive desires which, unless to be eventually
+ indulged, it were cruel to plant in us, &amp;c. &amp;c.). But,
+ <span title="meg' ôphelêma tout' edôrêsô brotois">&mu;&epsilon;&gamma;' &omega;&phi;&epsilon;&lambda;&eta;&mu;&alpha; &tau;&omicron;&upsilon;&tau;' &epsilon;&delta;&omega;&rho;&eta;&sigma;&omega; &beta;&rho;&omicron;&tau;&omicron;&iota;&sigmaf;</span>! concludes the chorus, like a sigh
+ from the admitted Eleusinian Æschylus was! You cannot think how this
+ foolish circumstance struck me this evening, so I thought I would e'en
+ tell you at once and be done with it. Are you not my dear friend
+ already, and shall I not use you? And pray you not to 'lean out of the
+ window' when my own foot is only on the stair; do wait a little for
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">Yours <i>ever</i>,
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">
+R.B.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3>
+ <i>E.B.B. to R.B.</i>
+</h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">March 5, 1845.
+</p>
+<p>
+ But I did not mean to strike a 'tragic chord'; indeed I did not!
+ Sometimes one's melancholy will be uppermost and sometimes one's
+ mirth,&mdash;the world goes round, you know&mdash;and I suppose that in that
+ letter of mine the melancholy took the turn. As to 'escaping with my
+ life,' it was just a phrase&mdash;at least it did not signify more than
+ that the sense of mortality, and discomfort of it, is peculiarly
+ strong with me when east winds are blowing and waters freezing. For
+ the rest, I am <i>essentially better</i>, and have been for several
+ winters; and I feel as if it were intended for me to live and not die,
+ and I am reconciled to the feeling. Yes! I am satisfied to 'take up'
+ with the blind hopes again, and have them in the house with me, for
+ all that I sit by the window. By the way, did the chorus utter scorn
+ in the <span title="meg' ôphelêma">&mu;&epsilon;&gamma;' &omega;&phi;&epsilon;&lambda;&eta;&mu;&alpha;</span>. I think not. It is well to fly towards
+ the light, even where there may be some fluttering and bruising of
+ wings against the windowpanes, is it not?
+</p>
+<p>
+ There is an obscurer passage, on which I covet your thoughts, where
+ Prometheus, after the sublime declaration that, with a full knowledge
+ of the penalty reserved for him, he had sinned of free will and
+ choice&mdash;goes on to say&mdash;or to seem to say&mdash;that he had <i>not</i>, however,
+ foreseen the extent and detail of the torment, the skiey rocks, and
+ the friendless desolation. See v. 275. The intention of the poet
+ might have been to magnify to his audience the torment of the
+ martyrdom&mdash;but the heroism of the martyr diminishes in proportion&mdash;and
+ there appears to be a contradiction, and oversight. Or is my view
+ wrong? Tell me. And tell me too, if Æschylus not the divinest of all
+ the divine Greek souls? People say after Quintilian, that he is savage
+ and rude; a sort of poetic Orson, with his locks all wild. But I will
+ not hear it of my master! He is strong as Zeus is&mdash;and not as a
+ boxer&mdash;and tender as Power itself, which always is tenderest.
+</p>
+<p>
+ But to go back to the view of Life with the blind Hopes; you are not
+ to think&mdash;whatever I may have written or implied&mdash;that I lean either
+ to the philosophy or affectation which beholds the world through
+ darkness instead of light, and speaks of it wailingly. Now, may God
+ forbid that it should be so with me. I am not desponding by nature,
+ and after a course of bitter mental discipline and long bodily
+ seclusion, I come out with two learnt lessons (as I sometimes say and
+ oftener feel),&mdash;the wisdom of cheerfulness&mdash;and the duty of social
+ intercourse. Anguish has instructed me in joy, and solitude in
+ society; it has been a wholesome and not unnatural reaction. And
+ altogether, I may say that the earth looks the brighter to me in
+ proportion to my own deprivations. The laburnum trees and rose trees
+ are plucked up by the roots&mdash;but the sunshine is in their places, and
+ the root of the sunshine is above the storms. What we call Life is a
+ condition of the soul, and the soul must improve in happiness and
+ wisdom, except by its own fault. These tears in our eyes, these
+ faintings of the flesh, will not hinder such improvement.
+</p>
+<p>
+ And I do like to hear testimonies like yours, to <i>happiness</i>, and I
+ feel it to be a testimony of a higher sort than the obvious one.
+ Still, it is obvious too that you have been spared, up to this time,
+ the great natural afflictions, against which we are nearly all called,
+ sooner or later, to struggle and wrestle&mdash;or your step would not be
+ 'on the stair' quite so lightly. And so, we turn to you, dear Mr.
+ Browning, for comfort and gentle spiriting! Remember that as you owe
+ your unscathed joy to God, you should pay it back to His world. And I
+ thank you for some of it already.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Also, writing as from friend to friend&mdash;as you say rightly that we
+ are&mdash;I ought to confess that of one class of griefs (which has been
+ called too the bitterest), I know as little as you. The cruelty of the
+ world, and the treason of it&mdash;the unworthiness of the dearest; of
+ these griefs I have scanty knowledge. It seems to me from my personal
+ experience that there is kindness everywhere in different proportions,
+ and more goodness and tenderheartedness than we read of in the
+ moralists. People have been kind to <i>me</i>, even without understanding
+ me, and pitiful to me, without approving of me:&mdash;nay, have not the
+ very critics tamed their beardom for me, and roared delicately as
+ sucking doves, on behalf of me? I have no harm to say of your world,
+ though I am not of it, as you see. And I have the cream of it in your
+ friendship, and a little more, and I do not envy much the milkers of
+ the cows.
+</p>
+<p>
+ How kind you are!&mdash;how kindly and gently you speak to me! Some things
+ you say are very touching, and some, surprising; and although I am
+ aware that you unconsciously exaggerate what I can be to you, yet it
+ is delightful to be broad awake and think of you as my friend.
+</p>
+<p>
+ May God bless you!
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">Faithfully yours,&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">
+<SPAN class="sc-ex">Elizabeth B. Barrett</span>.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3>
+ <i>R.B. to E.B.B.</i>
+</h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Tuesday Morning.<br>
+ [Post-mark, March 12, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ Your letter made me so happy, dear Miss Barrett, that I have kept
+ quiet this while; is it too great a shame if I begin to want more
+ good news of you, and to say so? Because there has been a bitter wind
+ ever since. Will you grant me a great favour? Always when you write,
+ though about your own works, not Greek plays merely, put me in,
+ <i>always</i>, a little official bulletin-line that shall say 'I am better'
+ or 'still better,' will you? That is done, then&mdash;and now, what do I
+ wish to tell you first? The poem you propose to make, for the times;
+ the fearless fresh living work you describe, is the <i>only</i> Poem to be
+ undertaken now by you or anyone that <i>is</i> a Poet at all; the only
+ reality, only effective piece of service to be rendered God and man;
+ it is what I have been all my life intending to do, and now shall be
+ much, much nearer doing, since you will along with me. And you <i>can</i>
+ do it, I know and am sure&mdash;so sure, that I could find in my heart to
+ be jealous of your stopping in the way even to translate the
+ Prometheus; though the accompanying monologue will make amends too. Or
+ shall I set you a task I meant for myself once upon a time?&mdash;which,
+ oh, how you would fulfil! Restore the Prometheus <span title="purphoros">&pi;&upsilon;&rho;&phi;&omicron;&rho;&omicron;&sigmaf;</span> as
+ Shelley did the <span title="Lyomenos">&Lambda;&upsilon;&omicron;&mu;&epsilon;&nu;&omicron;&sigmaf;</span>; when I say 'restore,' I know, or
+ very much fear, that the <span title="purphoros">&pi;&upsilon;&rho;&phi;&omicron;&rho;&omicron;&sigmaf;</span> was the same with the
+ <span title="purkaeus">&pi;&upsilon;&rho;&kappa;&alpha;&epsilon;&upsilon;&sigmaf;</span> which, by a fragment, we sorrowfully ascertain to
+ have been a Satyric Drama; but surely the capabilities of the subject
+ are much greater than in this, we now wonder at; nay, they include all
+ those of this last&mdash;for just see how magnificently the story unrolls
+ itself. The beginning of Jupiter's dynasty, the calm in Heaven after
+ the storm, the ascending&mdash;(stop, I will get the book and give the
+ words), <span title="opôs tachista ton patrôon eis thronon kathezet', euthus daimosin nemei gera alloisin alla--k.t.l.">&omicron;&pi;&omega;&sigmaf; &tau;&alpha;&chi;&iota;&sigma;&tau;&alpha; &tau;&omicron;&nu; &pi;&alpha;&tau;&rho;&omega;&omicron;&nu; &epsilon;&iota;&sigmaf; &theta;&rho;&omicron;&nu;&omicron;&nu; &kappa;&alpha;&theta;&epsilon;&zeta;&epsilon;&tau;', &epsilon;&upsilon;&theta;&upsilon;&sigmaf; &delta;&alpha;&iota;&mu;&omicron;&sigma;&iota;&nu; &nu;&epsilon;&mu;&epsilon;&iota; &gamma;&epsilon;&rho;&alpha; &alpha;&lambda;&lambda;&omicron;&iota;&sigma;&iota;&nu; &alpha;&lambda;&lambda;&alpha;&mdash;&kappa;.&tau;.&lambda;.</span>,<u><b><a href="#note-4">4</a></b></u> all the while
+ Prometheus being the first among the first in honour, as
+ <span title="kaitoi theoisi tois neois toutois gera tis allos, ê 'gô, pantelôs diôrise">&kappa;&alpha;&iota;&tau;&omicron;&iota; &theta;&epsilon;&omicron;&iota;&sigma;&iota; &tau;&omicron;&iota;&sigmaf; &nu;&epsilon;&omicron;&iota;&sigmaf; &tau;&omicron;&upsilon;&tau;&omicron;&iota;&sigmaf; &gamma;&epsilon;&rho;&alpha; &tau;&iota;&sigmaf; &alpha;&lambda;&lambda;&omicron;&sigmaf;, &eta; '&gamma;&omega;, &pi;&alpha;&nu;&tau;&epsilon;&lambda;&omega;&sigmaf; &delta;&iota;&omega;&rho;&iota;&sigma;&epsilon;</span>?<u><b><a href="#note-5">5</a></b></u>
+ then the one black hand-cloudlet storming the joyous
+ blue and gold everywhere, <span title="brotôn de tôn talaipôrôn logon ouk eschen oudena">&beta;&rho;&omicron;&tau;&omega;&nu; &delta;&epsilon; &tau;&omega;&nu; &tau;&alpha;&lambda;&alpha;&iota;&pi;&omega;&rho;&omega;&nu; &lambda;&omicron;&gamma;&omicron;&nu; &omicron;&upsilon;&kappa; &epsilon;&sigma;&chi;&epsilon;&nu; &omicron;&upsilon;&delta;&epsilon;&nu;&alpha;</span>,<u><b><a href="#note-6">6</a></b></u> and the design of Zeus to blot out the whole race,
+ and plant a new one. And Prometheus with his grand solitary
+ <span title="egô d' etolmêsa">&epsilon;&gamma;&omega; &delta;' &epsilon;&tau;&omicron;&lambda;&mu;&eta;&sigma;&alpha;</span>,<u><b><a href="#note-7">7</a></b></u> and his saving them, as the <i>first</i> good, from
+ annihilation. <a name="39"></a>Then comes the darkening brow of Zeus, and estrangement
+ from the benign circle of grateful gods, and the dissuasion of old
+ confederates, and all the Right that one may fancy in Might, the
+ strongest reasons <span title="pauesthai tropou philanthrôpou">&pi;&alpha;&upsilon;&epsilon;&sigma;&theta;&alpha;&iota; &tau;&rho;&omicron;&pi;&omicron;&upsilon; &phi;&iota;&lambda;&alpha;&nu;&theta;&rho;&omega;&pi;&omicron;&upsilon;</span><u><b><a href="#note-8">8</a></b></u> coming
+ from the own mind of the Titan, if you will, and all the while he
+ shall be proceeding steadily in the alleviation of the sufferings of
+ mortals whom, <span title="nêpious ontas to prin, ennous kai phrenôn epêbolous ethêke">&nu;&eta;&pi;&iota;&omicron;&upsilon;&sigmaf; &omicron;&nu;&tau;&alpha;&sigmaf; &tau;&omicron; &pi;&rho;&iota;&nu;, &epsilon;&nu;&nu;&omicron;&upsilon;&sigmaf; &kappa;&alpha;&iota; &phi;&rho;&epsilon;&nu;&omega;&nu; &epsilon;&pi;&eta;&beta;&omicron;&lambda;&omicron;&upsilon;&sigmaf; &epsilon;&theta;&eta;&kappa;&epsilon;</span>,<u><b><a href="#note-9">9</a></b></u> while still, in proportion, shall the doom he is
+ about to draw on himself, manifest itself more and more distinctly,
+ till at the last, he shall achieve the salvation of man, body (by the
+ gift of fire) and soul (by even those <span title="tuphlai elpides">&tau;&upsilon;&phi;&lambda;&alpha;&iota; &epsilon;&lambda;&pi;&iota;&delta;&epsilon;&sigmaf;</span>,<u><b><a href="#note-10">10</a></b></u>
+ hopes of immortality), and so having rendered him utterly, according
+ to the mythos here, <i>independent</i> of Jove&mdash;for observe, Prometheus in
+ the play never talks of helping mortals more, of fearing for them
+ more, of even benefiting them more by his sufferings. The rest is
+ between Jove and himself; he will reveal the master-secret to Jove
+ when he shall have released him, &amp;c. There is no stipulation that the
+ gifts to mortals shall be continued; indeed, by the fact that it is
+ Prometheus who hangs on Caucasus while 'the ephemerals possess fire,'
+ one sees that somehow mysteriously <i>they</i> are past Jove's harming now.
+ Well, this wholly achieved, the price is as wholly accepted, and off
+ into the darkness passes in calm triumphant grandeur the Titan, with
+ Strength and Violence, and Vulcan's silent and downcast eyes, and then
+ the gold clouds and renewed flushings of felicity shut up the scene
+ again, with Might in his old throne again, yet with a new element of
+ mistrust, and conscious shame, and fear, that writes significantly
+ enough above all the glory and rejoicing that all is not as it was,
+ nor will ever be. Such might be the framework of your Drama, just what
+ cannot help striking one at first glance, and would not such a Drama
+ go well before your translation? Do think of this and tell me&mdash;it
+ nearly writes itself. You see, I meant the <span title="meg' ôphelêma">&mu;&epsilon;&gamma;' &omega;&phi;&epsilon;&lambda;&eta;&mu;&alpha;</span><u><b><a href="#note-11">11</a></b></u>
+ to be a deep great truth; if there were no life beyond this, I think
+ the hope in one would be an incalculable blessing <i>for</i> this life,
+ which is melancholy for one like Æschylus to feel, if he could <i>only</i>
+ hope, because the argument as to the ulterior good of those hopes is
+ cut clean away, and what had he left?
+</p>
+<p>
+ I do not find it take away from my feeling of the magnanimity of
+ Prometheus that he should, in truth, complain (as he does from
+ beginning to end) of what he finds himself suffering. He could have
+ prevented all, and can stop it now&mdash;of that he never thinks for a
+ moment. That was the old Greek way&mdash;they never let an antagonistic
+ passion neutralise the other which was to influence the man to his
+ praise or blame. A Greek hero fears exceedingly and battles it out,
+ cries out when he is wounded and fights on, does not say his love or
+ hate makes him see no danger or feel no pain. Æschylus from first word
+ to last (<span title="idesthe me, oia paschô">&iota;&delta;&epsilon;&sigma;&theta;&epsilon; &mu;&epsilon;, &omicron;&iota;&alpha; &pi;&alpha;&sigma;&chi;&omega;</span><b><a href="#note-12">12</a></b>
+ to <span title="esoras me, hôs ekdika paschô">
+ &epsilon;&sigma;&omicron;&rho;&alpha;&sigmaf; &mu;&epsilon;, &omega;&sigmaf;
+
+&epsilon;&kappa;&delta;&iota;&kappa;&alpha; &pi;&alpha;&sigma;&chi;&omega;</span><b><a href="#note-13">13</a></b>) insists on the unmitigated reality of the
+ punishment which only the sun, and divine ether, and the godhead of
+ his mother can comprehend; still, still that is only what I suppose
+ Æschylus to have done&mdash;in your poem you shall make Prometheus our way.
+</p>
+<p>
+ And now enough of Greek, which I am fast forgetting (for I never look
+ at books I loved once)&mdash;it was your mention of the translation that
+ brought out the old fast fading outlines of the Poem in my brain&mdash;the
+ Greek poem, that is. You think&mdash;for I must get to <i>you</i>&mdash;that I
+ 'unconsciously exaggerate what you are to me.' Now, you don't know
+ what <i>that</i> is, nor can I very well tell you, because the language
+ with which I talk to myself of these matters is spiritual Attic, and
+ 'loves contractions,' as grammarians say; but I read it myself, and
+ well know what it means, that's why I told you I was self-conscious&mdash;I
+ meant that I never yet mistook my own feelings, one for
+ another&mdash;there! Of what use is talking? Only do you stay here with me
+ in the 'House' these few short years. Do you think I shall see you in
+ two months, three months? I may travel, perhaps. So you have got to
+ like society, and would enjoy it, you think? For me, I always hated
+ it&mdash;have put up with it these six or seven years past, lest by
+ foregoing it I should let some unknown good escape me, in the true
+ time of it, and only discover my fault when too late; and now that I
+ have done most of what is to be done, <i>any</i> lodge in a garden of
+ cucumbers for me! I don't even care about reading now&mdash;the world, and
+ pictures of it, rather than writings about the world! But you must
+ read books in order to get words and forms for 'the public' if you
+ <i>write</i>, and <i>that</i> you needs must do, if you fear God. I have no
+ pleasure in writing myself&mdash;none, in the mere act&mdash;though all pleasure
+ in the sense of fulfilling a duty, whence, if I have done my real
+ best, judge how heart-breaking a matter must it be to be pronounced a
+ poor creature by critic this and acquaintance the other! But I think
+ you like the operation of writing as I should like that of painting or
+ making music, do you not? After all, there is a great delight in the
+ heart of the thing; and use and forethought have made me ready at all
+ times to set to work&mdash;but&mdash;I don't know why&mdash;my heart sinks whenever I
+ open this desk, and rises when I shut it. Yet but for what I have
+ written you would never have heard of me&mdash;and <i>through</i> what you have
+ written, not properly <i>for</i> it, I love and wish you well! Now, will
+ you remember what I began my letter by saying&mdash;how you have promised
+ to let me know if my wishing takes effect, and if you still continue
+ better? And not even ... (since we are learned in magnanimity) don't
+ even tell me that or anything else, if it teases you,&mdash;but wait your
+ own good time, and know me for ... if these words were but my own, and
+ fresh-minted for this moment's use!...
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">Yours ever faithfully,&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">
+<SPAN class="sc-ex">R. Browning</span>.
+</p>
+<br>
+
+<h3>
+ <i>E.B.B. to R.B.</i>
+</h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">50 Wimpole Street: March 20, 1845.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Whenever I delay to write to you, dear Mr. Browning, it is not, be
+ sure, that I take my 'own good time,' but submit to my own bad time.
+ It was kind of you to wish to know how I was, and not unkind of me to
+ suspend my answer to your question&mdash;for indeed I have not been very
+ well, nor have had much heart for saying so. This implacable weather!
+ this east wind that seems to blow through the sun and moon! who can be
+ well in such a wind? Yet for me, I should not grumble. There has been
+ nothing very bad the matter with me, as there used to be&mdash;I only grow
+ weaker than usual, and learn my lesson of being mortal, in a
+ corner&mdash;and then all this must end! April is coming. There will be
+ both a May and a June if we live to see such things, and perhaps,
+ after all, we may. And as to seeing <i>you</i> besides, I observe that you
+ distrust me, and that perhaps you penetrate my morbidity and guess how
+ when the moment comes to see a living human face to which I am not
+ accustomed, I shrink and grow pale in the spirit. Do you? You are
+ learned in human nature, and you know the consequences of leading such
+ a secluded life as mine&mdash;notwithstanding all my fine philosophy about
+ social duties and the like&mdash;well&mdash;if you have such knowledge or if you
+ have it not, I cannot say, but I do say that I will indeed see you
+ when the warm weather has revived me a little, and put the earth 'to
+ rights' again so as to make pleasures of the sort possible. For if you
+ think that I shall not <i>like</i> to see you, you are wrong, for all your
+ learning. But I shall be afraid of you at first&mdash;though I am not, in
+ writing thus. You are Paracelsus, and I am a recluse, with nerves that
+ have been all broken on the rack, and now hang loosely&mdash;quivering at a
+ step and breath.
+</p>
+<p>
+ And what you say of society draws me on to many comparative thoughts
+ of your life and mine. You seem to have drunken of the cup of life
+ full, with the sun shining on it. I have lived only inwardly; or with
+ <i>sorrow</i>, for a strong emotion. Before this seclusion of my illness, I
+ was secluded still, and there are few of the youngest women in the
+ world who have not seen more, heard more, known more, of society, than
+ I, who am scarcely to be called young now. I grew up in the
+ country&mdash;had no social opportunities, had my heart in books and
+ poetry, and my experience in reveries. My sympathies drooped towards
+ the ground like an untrained honeysuckle&mdash;and but for <i>one</i>, in my own
+ house&mdash;but of this I cannot speak. It was a lonely life, growing green
+ like the grass around it. Books and dreams were what I lived in&mdash;and
+ domestic life only seemed to buzz gently around, like the bees about
+ the grass. And so time passed, and passed&mdash;and afterwards, when my
+ illness came and I seemed to stand at the edge of the world with all
+ done, and no prospect (as appeared at one time) of ever passing the
+ threshold of one room again; why then, I turned to thinking with some
+ bitterness (after the greatest sorrow of my life had given me room and
+ time to breathe) that I had stood blind in this temple I was about to
+ leave&mdash;that I had seen no Human nature, that my brothers and sisters
+ of the earth were <i>names</i> to me, that I had beheld no great mountain
+ or river, nothing in fact. I was as a man dying who had not read
+ Shakespeare, and it was too late! do you understand? And do you also
+ know what a disadvantage this ignorance is to my art? Why, if I live
+ on and yet do not escape from this seclusion, do you not perceive that
+ I labour under signal disadvantages&mdash;that I am, in a manner, as a
+ <i>blind poet</i>? Certainly, there is a compensation to a degree. I have
+ had much of the inner life, and from the habit of self-consciousness
+ and self-analysis, I make great guesses at Human nature in the main.
+ But how willingly I would as a poet exchange some of this lumbering,
+ ponderous, helpless knowledge of books, for some experience of life
+ and man, for some....
+</p>
+<p>
+ But all grumbling is a vile thing. We should all thank God for our
+ measures of life, and think them enough for each of us. I write so,
+ that you may not mistake what I wrote before in relation to society,
+ although you do not see from my point of view; and that you may
+ understand what I mean fully when I say, that I have lived all my
+ chief <i>joys</i>, and indeed nearly all emotions that go warmly by that
+ name and relate to myself personally, in poetry and in poetry alone.
+ Like to write? Of course, of course I do. I seem to live while I
+ write&mdash;it is life, for me. Why, what is to live? Not to eat and drink
+ and breathe,&mdash;but to feel the life in you down all the fibres of
+ being, passionately and joyfully. And thus, one lives in composition
+ surely&mdash;not always&mdash;but when the wheel goes round and the procession
+ is uninterrupted. Is it not so with you? oh&mdash;it must be so. For the
+ rest, there will be necessarily a reaction; and, in my own particular
+ case, whenever I see a poem of mine in print, or even smoothly
+ transcribed, the reaction is most painful. The pleasure, the sense of
+ power, without which I could not write a line, is gone in a moment;
+ and nothing remains but disappointment and humiliation. I never wrote
+ a poem which you could not persuade me to tear to pieces if you took
+ me at the right moment! I have a <i>seasonable</i> humility, I do assure
+ you.
+</p>
+<p>
+ How delightful to talk about oneself; but as you 'tempted me and I did
+ eat,' I entreat your longsuffering of my sin, and ah! if you would
+ but sin back so in turn! You and I seem to meet in a mild contrarious
+ harmony ... as in the 'si no, si no' of an Italian duet. I want to see
+ more of men, and you have seen too much, you say. I am in ignorance,
+ and you, in satiety. 'You don't even care about reading now.' Is it
+ possible? And I am as 'fresh' about reading, as ever I was&mdash;as long as
+ I keep out of the shadow of the dictionaries and of theological
+ controversies, and the like. Shall I whisper it to you under the
+ memory of the last rose of last summer? <i>I am very fond of romances</i>;
+ yes! and I read them not only as some wise people are known to do, for
+ the sake of the eloquence here and the sentiment there, and the
+ graphic intermixtures here and there, but for the story! just as
+ little children would, sitting on their papa's knee. My childish love
+ of a story never wore out with my love of plum cake, and now there is
+ not a hole in it. I make it a rule, for the most part, to read all the
+ romances that other people are kind enough to write&mdash;and woe to the
+ miserable wight who tells me how the third volume endeth. Have you in
+ you any surviving innocence of this sort? or do you call it idiocy? If
+ you do, I will forgive you, only smiling to myself&mdash;I give you
+ notice,&mdash;with a smile of superior pleasure! Mr. Chorley made me quite
+ laugh the other day by recommending Mary Hewitt's 'Improvisatore,'
+ with a sort of deprecating reference to the <i>descriptions</i> in the
+ book, just as if I never read a novel&mdash;<i>I!</i> I wrote a confession back
+ to him which made him shake his head perhaps, and now I confess to
+ <i>you</i>, unprovoked. I am one who could have forgotten the plague,
+ listening to Boccaccio's stories; and I am not ashamed of it. I do not
+ even 'see the better part,' I am so silly.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Ah! you tempt me with a grand vision of Prometheus! <i>I</i>, who have just
+ escaped with my life, after treading Milton's ground, you would send
+ me to Æschylus's. No, <i>I do not dare</i>. And besides ... I am inclined
+ to think that we want new <i>forms</i>, as well as thoughts. The old gods
+ are dethroned. Why should we go back to the antique moulds, classical
+ moulds, as they are so improperly called? If it is a necessity of Art
+ to do so, why then those critics are right who hold that Art is
+ exhausted and the world too worn out for poetry. I do not, for my
+ part, believe this: and I believe the so-called necessity of Art to be
+ the mere feebleness of the artist. Let us all aspire rather to <i>Life</i>,
+ and let the dead bury their dead. If we have but courage to face these
+ conventions, to touch this low ground, we shall take strength from it
+ instead of losing it; and of that, I am intimately persuaded. For
+ there is poetry <i>everywhere</i>; the 'treasure' (see the old fable) lies
+ all over the field. And then Christianity is a worthy <i>myth</i>, and
+ poetically acceptable.
+</p>
+<p>
+ I had much to say to you, or at least something, of the 'blind hopes'
+ &amp;c., but am ashamed to take a step into a new sheet. If you mean 'to
+ travel,' why, I shall have to miss you. Do you really mean it? How is
+ the play going on? and the poem?
+</p>
+<p>
+ May God bless you!
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">Ever and truly yours,</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">
+E.B.B.
+</p>
+<h3>
+ <i>R.B. to E.B.B.</i>
+</h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Monday Morning.<br>
+[Post-mark, March 31, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ When you read Don Quixote, my dear romance-reader, do you ever notice
+ that flower of an incident of good fellowship where the friendly
+ Squire of Him of the Moon, or the Looking glasses, (I forget which)
+ passes to Sancho's dry lips, (all under a cork-tree one morning)&mdash;a
+ plump wine-skin,&mdash;and do you admire dear brave Miguel's knowledge of
+ thirsty nature when he tells you that the Drinker, having seriously
+ considered for a space the Pleiads, or place where they should be,
+ fell, as he slowly returned the shrivelled bottle to its donor, into a
+ deep musing of an hour's length, or thereabouts, and then ... mark ...
+ only <i>then</i>, fetching a profound sigh, broke silence with ... such a
+ piece of praise as turns pale the labours in that way of Rabelais and
+ the Teian (if he wasn't a Byzantine monk, alas!) and our Mr. Kenyon's
+ stately self&mdash;(since my own especial poet <i>à moi</i>, that can do all
+ with anybody, only 'sips like a fly,' she says, and so cares not to
+ compete with these behemoths that drink up Jordan)&mdash;Well, then ...
+ (oh, I must get quick to the sentence's end, and be brief as an
+ oracle-explainer!)&mdash;the giver is you and the taker is I, and the
+ letter is the wine, and the star-gazing is the reading the same, and
+ the brown study is&mdash;how shall I deserve and be grateful enough to this
+ new strange friend of my own, that has taken away my reproach among
+ men, that have each and all their friend, so they say (... not that I
+ believe all they say&mdash;they boast too soon sometimes, no doubt,&mdash;I once
+ was shown a letter wherein the truth stumbled out after this fashion
+ 'Dere Smith,&mdash;I calls you "<i>dere</i>" ... because you are so in your
+ shop!')&mdash;and the great sigh is,&mdash;there is no deserving nor being
+ grateful at all,&mdash;and the breaking silence is, and the praise is ...
+ ah, there, enough of it! This sunny morning is as if I wished it for
+ you&mdash;10 strikes by the clock now&mdash;tell me if at 10 this morning you
+ feel any good from my heart's wishes for you&mdash;I would give you all you
+ want out of my own life and gladness and yet keep twice the stock that
+ should by right have sufficed the thin white face that is laughing at
+ me in the glass yonder at the fancy of its making anyone afraid ...
+ and now, with another kind of laugh, at the thought that when its
+ owner 'travels' next, he will leave off Miss Barrett along with port
+ wine&mdash;<i>Dii meliora piis</i>, and, among them to
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">Yours every where, and at all times yours</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">
+<SPAN class="sc-ex">R. Browning</span>.
+</p>
+<p>
+ I have all to say yet&mdash;next letter. R.B.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3>
+ <i>R.B. to E.B.B.</i>
+</h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Tuesday Night.<br>
+[Post-mark, April 16, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ I heard of you, dear Miss Barrett, between a Polka and a Cellarius the
+ other evening, of Mr. Kenyon&mdash;how this wind must hurt you! And
+ yesterday I had occasion to go your way&mdash;past, that is, Wimpole
+ Street, the end of it,&mdash;and, do you know, I did not seem to have leave
+ from you to go down it yet, much less count number after number till I
+ came to yours,&mdash;much least than less, look up when I did come there.
+ So I went on to a viperine she-friend of mine who, I think, rather
+ loves me she does so hate me, and we talked over the chances of
+ certain other friends who were to be balloted for at the 'Athenæum'
+ last night,&mdash;one of whom, it seems, was in a fright about it&mdash;'to such
+ little purpose' said my friend&mdash;'for he is so inoffensive&mdash;now, if one
+ were to style <i>you</i> that&mdash;' 'Or you'&mdash;I said&mdash;and so we hugged
+ ourselves in our grimness like tiger-cats. Then there is a deal in the
+ papers to-day about Maynooth, and a meeting presided over by Lord
+ Mayor Gibbs, and the Reverend Mr. Somebody's speech. And Mrs. Norton
+ has gone and book-made at a great rate about the Prince of Wales,
+ pleasantly putting off till his time all that used of old to be put
+ off till his mother's time;&mdash;altogether, I should dearly like to hear
+ from you, but not till the wind goes, and sun comes&mdash;because I shall
+ see Mr. Kenyon next week and get him to tell me some more. By the way,
+ do you suppose anybody else looks like him? If you do, the first room
+ full of real London people you go among you will fancy to be lighted
+ up by a saucer of burning salt and spirits of wine in the back ground.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Monday&mdash;last night when I could do nothing else I began to write to
+ you, such writing as you have seen&mdash;strange! The proper time and
+ season for good sound sensible and profitable forms of speech&mdash;when
+ ought it to have occurred, and how did I evade it in these letters of
+ mine? For people begin with a graceful skittish levity, lest you
+ should be struck all of a heap with what is to come, and <i>that</i> is
+ sure to be the stuff and staple of the man, full of wisdom and
+ sorrow,&mdash;and then again comes the fringe of reeds and pink little
+ stones on the other side, that you may put foot on land, and draw
+ breath, and think what a deep pond you have swum across. But <i>you</i> are
+ the real deep wonder of a creature,&mdash;and I sail these paper-boats on
+ you rather impudently. But I always mean to be very grave one
+ day,&mdash;when I am in better spirits and can go <i>fuori di me</i>.
+</p>
+<p>
+ And one thing I want to persuade you of, which is, that all you gain
+ by travel is the discovery that you have gained nothing, and have done
+ rightly in trusting to your innate ideas&mdash;or not rightly in
+ distrusting them, as the case may be. You get, too, a little ...
+ perhaps a considerable, good, in finding the world's accepted <i>moulds</i>
+ everywhere, into which you may run and fix your own fused metal,&mdash;but
+ not a grain Troy-weight do you get of new gold, silver or brass. After
+ this, you go boldly on your own resources, and are justified to
+ yourself, that's all. Three scratches with a pen,<a href="#note-14"><b>14</b></a> even with this
+ pen,&mdash;and you have the green little Syrenusa where I have sate and
+ heard the quails sing. One of these days I shall describe a country I
+ have seen in my soul only, fruits, flowers, birds and all.
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">Ever yours, dear Miss Barrett,
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">
+<SPAN class="sc-ex">R. Browning</span>.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3>
+ <i>E.B.B. to R.B.</i>
+</h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Thursday Morning.<br>
+[Post-mark, April 18, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ If you did but know dear Mr. Browning how often I have written ... not
+ this letter I am about to write, but another better letter to you, ...
+ in the midst of my silence, ... you would not think for a moment that
+ the east wind, with all the harm it does to me, is able to do the
+ great harm of putting out the light of the thought of you to my mind;
+ for this, indeed, it has no power to do. I had the pen in my hand once
+ to write; and why it fell out, I cannot tell you. And you see, ... all
+ your writing will not change the wind! You wished all manner of good
+ to me one day as the clock struck ten; yes, and I assure you I was
+ better that day&mdash;and I must not forget to tell you so though it is so
+ long since. And <i>therefore</i>, I was logically bound to believe that you
+ had never thought of me since ... unless you thought east winds of me!
+ <i>That</i> was quite clear; was it not? or would have been; if it had not
+ been for the supernatural conviction, I had above all, of your
+ kindness, which was too large to be taken in the hinge of a syllogism.
+ In fact I have long left off thinking that logic proves anything&mdash;it
+ <i>doesn't</i>, you know.
+</p>
+<p>
+ But your Lamia has taught you some subtle 'viperine' reasoning and
+ <i>motiving</i>, for the turning down one street instead of another. It was
+ conclusive.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Ah&mdash;but you will never persuade me that I am the better, or as well,
+ for the thing that I have not. We look from different points of view,
+ and yours is the point of attainment. Not that you do not truly say
+ that, when all is done, we must come home to place our engines, and
+ act by our own strength. I do not want material as material; no one
+ does&mdash;but every life requires a full experience, a various
+ experience&mdash;and I have a profound conviction that where a poet has
+ been shut from most of the outward aspects of life, he is at a
+ lamentable disadvantage. Can you, speaking for yourself, separate the
+ results in you from the external influences at work around you, that
+ you say so boldly that you get nothing from the world? You do not
+ <i>directly</i>, I know&mdash;but you do indirectly and by a rebound. Whatever
+ acts upon you, becomes <i>you</i>&mdash;and whatever you love or hate, whatever
+ charms you or is scorned by you, acts on you and becomes <i>you</i>. Have
+ you read the 'Improvisatore'? or will you? The writer seems to feel,
+ just as I do, the good of the outward life; and he is a poet in his
+ soul. It is a book full of beauty and had a great charm to me.
+</p>
+<p>
+ As to the Polkas and Cellariuses I do not covet them of course ... but
+ what a strange world you seem to have, to me at a distance&mdash;what a
+ strange husk of a world! How it looks to me like mandarin-life or
+ something as remote; nay, not mandarin-life but mandarin <i>manners</i>,
+ ... life, even the outer life, meaning something deeper, in my account
+ of it. As to dear Mr. Kenyon I do not make the mistake of fancying
+ that many can look like him or talk like him or <i>be</i> like him. I know
+ enough to know otherwise. When he spoke of me he should have said that
+ I was better notwithstanding the east wind. It is really true&mdash;I am
+ getting slowly up from the prostration of the severe cold, and feel
+ stronger in myself.
+</p>
+<p>
+ But Mrs. Norton discourses excellent music&mdash;and for the rest, there
+ are fruits in the world so over-ripe, that they will fall, ... without
+ being gathered. Let Maynooth witness to it! <i>if you think it worth
+ while</i>!
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">Ever yours,&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right"><SPAN class="sc-ex">Elizabeth B. Barrett</span>.
+</p>
+<p>
+ And <i>is it</i> nothing to be 'justified to one's self in one's
+ resources?' '<i>That's all</i>,' indeed! For the 'soul's country' we will
+ have it also&mdash;and I know how well the birds sing in it. How glad I was
+ by the way to see your letter!
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3>
+ <i>R.B. to E.B.B.</i>
+</h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Wednesday Morning.<br>
+[Post-mark, April 30, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ If you did but know, dear Miss Barrett, how the 'full stop' after
+ 'Morning' just above, has turned out the fullest of stops,&mdash;and how
+ for about a quarter of an hour since the ink dried I have been
+ reasoning out the why and wherefore of the stopping, the wisdom of it,
+ and the folly of it....
+</p>
+<p>
+ By this time you see what you have got in me&mdash;You ask me questions,
+ 'if I like novels,' 'if the "Improvisatore" is not good,' 'if travel
+ and sightseeing do not effect this and that for one,' and 'what I am
+ devising&mdash;play or poem,'&mdash;and I shall not say I could not answer at
+ all manner of lengths&mdash;but, let me only begin some good piece of
+ writing of the kind, and ... no, you shall have it, have what I was
+ going to tell you stops such judicious beginnings,&mdash;in a parallel
+ case, out of which your ingenuity shall, please, pick the
+ meaning&mdash;There is a story of D'Israeli's, an old one, with an episode
+ of strange interest, or so I found it years ago,&mdash;well, you go
+ breathlessly on with the people of it, page after page, till at last
+ the end <i>must</i> come, you feel&mdash;and the tangled threads draw to one,
+ and an out-of-door feast in the woods helps you ... that is, helps
+ them, the people, wonderfully on,&mdash;and, lo, dinner is done, and Vivian
+ Grey is here, and Violet Fane there,&mdash;and a detachment of the party is
+ drafted off to go catch butterflies, and only two or three stop
+ behind. At this moment, Mr. Somebody, a good man and rather the lady's
+ uncle, 'in answer to a question from Violet, drew from his pocket a
+ small neatly written manuscript, and, seating himself on an inverted
+ wine-cooler, proceeded to read the following brief remarks upon the
+ characteristics of the Moeso-gothic literature'&mdash;this ends the
+ page,&mdash;which you don't turn at once! But when you <i>do</i>, in bitterness
+ of soul, turn it, you read&mdash;'On consideration, I' (Ben, himself)
+ 'shall keep them for Mr. Colburn's <i>New Magazine</i>'&mdash;and deeply you
+ draw thankful breath! (Note this 'parallel case' of mine is pretty
+ sure to meet the usual fortune of my writings&mdash;you will ask what it
+ means&mdash;and this it means, or should mean, all of it, instance and
+ reasoning and all,&mdash;that I am naturally earnest, in earnest about
+ whatever thing I do, and little able to write about one thing while I
+ think of another)&mdash;
+</p>
+<p>
+ I think I will really write verse to you some day&mdash;<i>this</i> day, it is
+ quite clear I had better give up trying.
+</p>
+<p>
+ No, spite of all the lines in the world, I will make an end of it, as
+ Ophelia with her swan's-song,&mdash;for it grows too absurd. But remember
+ that I write letters to nobody but you, and that I want method and
+ much more. That book you like so, the Danish novel, must be full of
+ truth and beauty, to judge from the few extracts I have seen in
+ Reviews. That a Dane should write so, confirms me in an old
+ belief&mdash;that Italy is stuff for the use of the North, and no
+ more&mdash;pure Poetry there is none, nearly as possible none, in Dante
+ even&mdash;material for Poetry in the pitifullest romancist of their
+ thousands, on the contrary&mdash;strange that those great wide black eyes
+ should stare nothing out of the earth that lies before them! Alfieri,
+ with even grey eyes, and a life of travel, writes you some fifteen
+ tragedies as colourless as salad grown under a garden glass with
+ matting over it&mdash;as free, that is, from local colouring, touches of
+ the soil they are said to spring from,&mdash;think of 'Saulle,' and his
+ Greek attempts!
+</p>
+<p>
+ I expected to see Mr. Kenyon, at a place where I was last week, but he
+ kept away. Here is the bad wind back again, and the black sky. I am
+ sure I never knew till now whether the East or West or South were the
+ quarter to pray for&mdash;But surely the weather was a little better last
+ week, and you, were you not better? And do you know&mdash;but it's all
+ self-flattery I believe,&mdash;still I cannot help fancying the East wind
+ does my head harm too!
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">Ever yours faithfully,&nbsp; </p>
+<p style="text-align: right"><SPAN class="sc-ex">R. Browning</span>.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3>
+ <i>E.B.B. to R.B.</i>
+</h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Thursday.<br>
+[Post-mark, May 2, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ People say of you and of me, dear Mr. Browning, that we love the
+ darkness and use a sphinxine idiom in our talk; and really you do talk
+ a little like a sphinx in your argument drawn from 'Vivian Grey.' Once
+ I sate up all night to read 'Vivian Grey'; but I never drew such an
+ argument from him. Not that I give it up (nor <i>you</i> up) for a mere
+ mystery. Nor that I can '<i>see what you have got in you</i>,' from a mere
+ guess. But just observe! If I ask questions about novels, is it not
+ because I want to know how much elbow-room there may be for our
+ sympathies ... and whether there is room for my loose sleeves, and the
+ lace lappets, as well as for my elbows; and because I want to see
+ <i>you</i> by the refracted lights as well as by the direct ones; and
+ because I am willing for you to know <i>me</i> from the beginning, with all
+ my weaknesses and foolishnesses, ... as they are accounted by people
+ who say to me 'no one would ever think, without knowing you, that you
+ were so and so.' Now if I send all my idle questions to <i>Colburn's
+ Magazine</i>, with other Gothic literature, and take to standing up in a
+ perpendicular personality like the angel on the schoolman's needle, in
+ my letters to come, without further leaning to the left or the
+ right&mdash;why the end would be that <i>you</i> would take to 'running after
+ the butterflies,' for change of air and exercise. And then ... oh ...
+ then, my 'small neatly written manuscripts' might fall back into my
+ desk...! (<i>Not</i> a 'full stop'!.)
+</p>
+<p>
+ Indeed ... I do assure you ... I never for a moment thought of 'making
+ conversation' about the 'Improvisatore' or novels in general, when I
+ wrote what I did to you. I might, to other persons ... perhaps.
+ Certainly not to <i>you</i>. I was not dealing round from one pack of cards
+ to you and to others. That's what you meant to reproach me for you
+ know,&mdash;and of that, I am not guilty at all. I never could think of
+ 'making conversation' in a letter to <i>you</i>&mdash;never. Women are said to
+ partake of the nature of children&mdash;and my brothers call me 'absurdly
+ childish' sometimes: and I am capable of being childishly 'in earnest'
+ about novels, and straws, and such 'puppydogs' tails' as my Flush's!
+ Also I write more letters than you do, ... I write in fact almost as
+ you pay visits, ... and one has to 'make conversation' in turn, of
+ course. <i>But</i>&mdash;give me something to vow by&mdash;whatever you meant in the
+ 'Vivian Grey' argument, you were wrong in it! and you never can be
+ much more wrong&mdash;which is a comfortable reflection.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Yet you leap very high at Dante's crown&mdash;or you do not leap, ... you
+ simply extend your hand to it, and make a rustling among the laurel
+ leaves, which is somewhat prophane. Dante's poetry only materials for
+ the northern rhymers! I must think of that ... if you please ...
+ before I agree with you. Dante's poetry seems to come down in hail,
+ rather than in rain&mdash;but count me the drops congealed in one
+ hailstone! Oh! the 'Flight of the Duchess'&mdash;do let us hear more of
+ her! Are you (I wonder) ... not a 'self-flatterer,' ... but ... a
+ flatterer.
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">Ever yours,&nbsp;&nbsp;
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">E.B.B.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3>
+ <i>R.B. to E.B.B.</i>
+</h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Saturday Morning.<br>
+[Post-mark, May 3, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ Now shall you see what you shall see&mdash;here shall be 'sound speech not
+ to be reproved,'&mdash;for this morning you are to know that the soul of me
+ has it all her own way, dear Miss Barrett, this green cool
+ nine-in-the-morning time for my chestnut tree over there, and for me
+ who only coaxed my good-natured&mdash;(really)&mdash;body up, after its
+ three-hours' night-rest on condition it should lounge, or creep about,
+ incognito and without consequences&mdash;and so it shall, all but my
+ right-hand which is half-spirit and 'cuts' its poor relation, and
+ passes itself off for somebody (that is, some soul) and is doubly
+ active and ready on such occasions&mdash;Now I shall tell you all about it,
+ first what last letter meant, and then more. You are to know, then
+ that for some reason, that looked like an instinct, I thought I ought
+ not to send shaft on shaft, letter-plague on letter, with such an
+ uninterrupted clanging ... that I ought to wait, say a week at least
+ having killed all your mules for you, before I shot down your
+ dogs&mdash;but not being exactly Phoibos Apollon, you are to know further
+ that when I <i>did</i> think I might go modestly on, ... <span title="ômoi">&omega;&mu;&omicron;&iota;</span>, let
+ me get out of this slough of a simile, never mind with what
+ dislocation of ancles! Plainly, from waiting and turning my eyes away
+ (not from <i>you</i>, but from you in your special capacity of being
+ <i>written</i>-to, not spoken-to) when I turned again you had grown
+ formidable somehow&mdash;though that's not the word,&mdash;nor are you the
+ person, either,&mdash;it was my fortune, my privilege of being your friend
+ this one way, that it seemed a shame for me to make no better use of
+ than taking it up with talk about books and I don't know what. Write
+ what I will, you would read for once, I think&mdash;well, then,&mdash;what I
+ shall write shall be&mdash;something on this book, and the other book, and
+ my own books, and Mary Hewitt's books, and at the end of it&mdash;good bye,
+ and I hope here is a quarter of an hour rationally spent. So the
+ thought of what I should find in my heart to say, and the contrast
+ with what I suppose I ought to say ... all these things are against
+ me. But this is very foolish, all the same, I need not be told&mdash;and is
+ part and parcel of an older&mdash;indeed primitive body of mine, which I
+ shall never wholly get rid of, of desiring to do nothing when I cannot
+ do all; seeing nothing, getting, enjoying nothing, where there is no
+ seeing and getting and enjoying <i>wholly</i>&mdash;and in this case, moreover,
+ you are <i>you</i>, and know something about me, if not much, and have read
+ Bos on the art of supplying Ellipses, and (after, particularly, I have
+ confessed all this, why and how it has been) you will <i>subaudire</i> when
+ I pull out my Mediæval-Gothic-Architectural-Manuscript (so it was, I
+ remember now,) and instruct you about corbeils and ogives ... though,
+ after all, it was none of Vivian's doing, that,&mdash;all the uncle kind or
+ man's, which I never professed to be. Now you see how I came to say
+ some nonsense (I very vaguely think <i>what</i>) about Dante&mdash;some
+ desperate splash I know I made for the beginning of my picture, as
+ when a painter at his wits' end and hunger's beginning says 'Here
+ shall the figure's hand be'&mdash;and spots <i>that</i> down, meaning to reach
+ it naturally from the other end of his canvas,&mdash;and leaving off tired,
+ there you see the spectral disjoined thing, and nothing between it and
+ rationality. I intended to shade down and soften off and put in and
+ leave out, and, before I had done, bring Italian Poets round to their
+ old place again in my heart, giving new praise if I took old,&mdash;anyhow
+ Dante is out of it all, as who knows but I, with all of him in my head
+ and heart? But they do fret one, those tantalizing creatures, of fine
+ passionate class, with such capabilities, and such a facility of being
+ made pure mind of. And the special instance that vexed me, was that a
+ man of sands and dog-roses and white rock and green sea-water just
+ under, should come to Italy where my heart lives, and discover the
+ sights and sounds ... certainly discover them. And so do all Northern
+ writers; for take up handfuls of sonetti, rime, poemetti, doings of
+ those who never did anything else,&mdash;and try and make out, for
+ yourself, what ... say, what flowers they tread on, or trees they walk
+ under,&mdash;as you might bid <i>them</i>, those tree and flower loving
+ creatures, pick out of <i>our</i> North poetry a notion of what <i>our</i>
+ daisies and harebells and furze bushes and brambles are&mdash;'Odorosi
+ fioretti, rose porporine, bianchissimi gigli.' And which of you
+ eternal triflers was it called yourself 'Shelley' and so told me years
+ ago that in the mountains it was a feast
+</p>
+<blockquote>
+ <blockquote>
+ <blockquote>
+ <blockquote>
+ <blockquote>
+<p style="text-indent: 0em">When one should find those globes of deep red gold&mdash;<br>
+Which in the woods the strawberry-tree doth bear,<br>
+Suspended in their emerald atmosphere.
+</p>
+ </blockquote>
+ </blockquote>
+ </blockquote>
+ </blockquote>
+</blockquote>
+<p style="text-indent: 0em">
+ so that when my Uncle walked into a sorb-tree, not to tumble sheer
+ over Monte Calvano, and I felt the fruit against my face, the little
+ ragged bare-legged guide fairly laughed at my knowing them so
+ well&mdash;'Niursi&mdash;sorbi!' No, no,&mdash;does not all Naples-bay and half
+ Sicily, shore and inland, come flocking once a year to the Piedigrotta
+ fête only to see the blessed King's Volanti, or livery servants all in
+ their best; as though heaven opened; and would not I engage to bring
+ the whole of the Piano (of Sorrento) in likeness to a red velvet
+ dressing gown properly spangled over, before the priest that held it
+ out on a pole had even begun his story of how Noah's son Shem, the
+ founder of Sorrento, threw it off to swim thither, as the world knows
+ he did? Oh, it makes one's soul angry, so enough of it. But never
+ enough of telling you&mdash;bring all your sympathies, come with loosest
+ sleeves and longest lace-lappets, and you and yours shall find 'elbow
+ room,' oh, shall you not! For never did man, woman or child, Greek,
+ Hebrew, or as Danish as our friend, like a thing, not to say love it,
+ but I liked and loved it, one liking neutralizing the rebellious stir
+ of its fellow, so that I don't go about now wanting the fixed stars
+ before my time; this world has not escaped me, thank God; and&mdash;what
+ other people say is the best of it, may not escape me after all,
+ though until so very lately I made up my mind to do without
+ it;&mdash;perhaps, on that account, and to make fair amends to other
+ people, who, I have no right to say, complain without cause. I have
+ been surprised, rather, with something not unlike illness of late&mdash;I
+ have had a constant pain in the head for these two months, which only
+ very rough exercise gets rid of, and which stops my 'Luria' and much
+ besides. I thought I never could be unwell. Just now all of it is
+ gone, thanks to polking all night and walking home by broad daylight
+ to the surprise of the thrushes in the bush here. And do you know I
+ said 'this must <i>go</i>, cannot mean to stay, so I will not tell Miss
+ Barrett why this and this is not done,'&mdash;but I mean to tell you all,
+ or more of the truth, because you call me 'flatterer,' so that my eyes
+ widened again! I, and in what? And of whom, pray? not of <i>you</i>, at all
+ events,&mdash;of whom then? <i>Do</i> tell me, because I want to stand with
+ you&mdash;and am quite in earnest there. And 'The Flight of the Duchess,'
+ to leave nothing out, is only the beginning of a story written some
+ time ago, and given to poor Hood in his emergency at a day's
+ notice,&mdash;the true stuff and story is all to come, the 'Flight,' and
+ what you allude to is the mere introduction&mdash;but the Magazine has
+ passed into other hands and I must put the rest in some 'Bell' or
+ other&mdash;it is one of my Dramatic Romances. So is a certain 'Saul' I
+ should like to show you one day&mdash;an ominous liking&mdash;for nobody ever
+ sees what I do till it is printed. But as you <i>do</i> know the printed
+ little part of me, I should not be sorry if, in justice, you knew all
+ I have <i>really</i> done,&mdash;written in the portfolio there,&mdash;though that
+ would be far enough from <i>this</i> me, that wishes to you now. I should
+ like to write something in concert with you, how I would try!
+</p>
+<p>
+ I have read your letter through again. Does this clear up all the
+ difficulty, and do you see that I never dreamed of 'reproaching you
+ for dealing out one sort of cards to me and everybody else'&mdash;but that
+ ... why, '<i>that</i>' which I have, I hope, said, so need not resay. I
+ will tell you&mdash;Sydney Smith laughs somewhere at some Methodist or
+ other whose wont was, on meeting an acquaintance in the street, to
+ open at once on him with some enquiry after the state of his
+ soul&mdash;Sydney knows better now, and sees that one might quite as wisely
+ ask such questions as the price of Illinois stock or condition of
+ glebe-land,&mdash;and I <i>could</i> say such&mdash;'could,'&mdash;the plague of it! So no
+ more at present from your loving.... Or, let me tell you I am going to
+ see Mr. Kenyon on the 12th inst.&mdash;that you do not tell me how you are,
+ and that yet if you do not continue to improve in health ... I shall
+ not see you&mdash;not&mdash;not&mdash;not&mdash;what 'knots' to untie! Surely the wind
+ that sets my chestnut-tree dancing, all its baby-cone-blossoms, green
+ now, rocking like fairy castles on a hill in an earthquake,&mdash;that is
+ South West, surely! God bless you, and me in that&mdash;and do write to me
+ soon, and tell me who was the 'flatterer,' and how he never was
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">Yours&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; </p>
+<p style="text-align: right">R.B.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3>
+ <i>E.B.B. to R.B.</i>
+</h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Monday&mdash;and Tuesday.<br>
+[Post-mark, May 6, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ So when wise people happen to be ill, they sit up till six o'clock in
+ the morning and get up again at nine? Do tell me how Lurias can ever
+ be made out of such ungodly imprudences. If the wind blows east or
+ west, where can any remedy be, while such evil deeds are being
+ committed? And what is to be the end of it? And what is the
+ reasonableness of it in the meantime, when we all know that thinking,
+ dreaming, creating people like yourself, have two lives to bear
+ instead of one, and therefore ought to sleep more than others, ...
+ throwing over and buckling in that fold of death, to stroke the
+ life-purple smoother. You have to live your own personal life, and
+ also Luria's life&mdash;and therefore you should sleep for both. It is
+ logical indeed&mdash;and rational, ... which logic is not always ... and if
+ I had 'the tongue of men and of angels,' I would use it to persuade
+ you. Polka, for the rest, may be good; but sleep is better. I think
+ better of sleep than I ever did, now that she will not easily come
+ near me except in a red hood of poppies. And besides, ... praise your
+ 'goodnatured body' as you like, ... it is only a seeming goodnature!
+ Bodies bear malice in a terrible way, be very sure!&mdash;appear mild and
+ smiling for a few short years, and then ... out with a cold steel; and
+ the <i>soul has it</i>, 'with a vengeance,' ... according to the phrase!
+ You will not persist, (will you?) in this experimental homicide. Or
+ tell me if you will, that I may do some more tearing. It really,
+ really is wrong. Exercise is one sort of rest and you feel relieved by
+ it&mdash;and sleep is another: one being as necessary as the other.
+</p>
+<p>
+ This is the first thing I have to say. The next is a question. <i>What
+ do you mean about your manuscripts ... about 'Saul' and the
+ portfolio?</i> for I am afraid of hazardously supplying ellipses&mdash;and
+ your 'Bos' comes to <span title="bous epi glôssê">&beta;&omicron;&upsilon;&sigmaf; &epsilon;&pi;&iota; &gamma;&lambda;&omega;&sigma;&sigma;&eta;</span>.<b><a href="#note-15">15</a></b> I get half bribed to
+ silence by the very pleasure of fancying. But if it could be possible
+ that you should mean to say you would show me.... Can it be? or am I
+ reading this 'Attic contraction' quite the wrong way? You see I am
+ afraid of the difference between flattering myself and being
+ flattered; the fatal difference. And now will you understand that I
+ should be too overjoyed to have revelations from the 'Portfolio,' ...
+ however incarnated with blots and pen-scratches, ... to be able to ask
+ impudently of them now? Is that plain?
+</p>
+<p>
+ It must be, ... at any rate, ... that if <i>you</i> would like to 'write
+ something together' with me, <i>I</i> should like it still better. I should
+ like it for some ineffable reasons. And I should not like it a bit the
+ less for the grand supply of jests it would administer to the critical
+ Board of Trade, about visible darkness, multiplied by two, mounting
+ into palpable obscure. We should not mind ... should we? <i>you</i> would
+ not mind, if you had got over certain other considerations
+ deconsiderating to your coadjutor. Yes&mdash;but I dare not do it, ... I
+ mean, think of it, ... just now, if ever: and I will tell you why in a
+ Mediæval-Gothic-architectural manuscript.
+</p>
+<p>
+ The only poet by profession (if I may say so,) except yourself, with
+ whom I ever had much intercourse even on paper, (if this is near to
+ 'much') has been Mr. Horne. We approached each other on the point of
+ one of Miss Mitford's annual editorships; and ever since, he has had
+ the habit of writing to me occasionally; and when I was too ill to
+ write at all, in my dreary Devonshire days, I was his debtor for
+ various little kindnesses, ... for which I continue his debtor. In my
+ opinion he is a truehearted and generous man. Do you not think so?
+ Well&mdash;long and long ago, he asked me to write a drama with him on the
+ Greek model; that is, for me to write the choruses, and for him to do
+ the dialogue. Just then it was quite doubtful in my own mind, and
+ worse than doubtful, whether I ever should write again; and the very
+ doubtfulness made me speak my 'yes' more readily. Then I was desired
+ to make a subject, ... to conceive a plan; and my plan was of a man,
+ haunted by his own soul, ... (making her a separate personal Psyche, a
+ dreadful, beautiful Psyche)&mdash;the man being haunted and terrified
+ through all the turns of life by her. Did you ever feel afraid of your
+ own soul, as I have done? I think it is a true wonder of our
+ humanity&mdash;and fit subject enough for a wild lyrical drama. I should
+ like to write it by myself at least, well enough. But with him I will
+ not now. It was delayed ... delayed. He cut the plan up into scenes
+ ... I mean into a list of scenes ... a sort of ground-map to work
+ on&mdash;and there it lies. Nothing more was done. It all lies in one
+ sheet&mdash;and I have offered to give up my copyright of idea in it&mdash;if he
+ likes to use it alone&mdash;or I should not object to work it out alone on
+ my own side, since it comes from me: only I will not consent now to a
+ <i>double work</i> in it. There are objections&mdash;none, be it well
+ understood, in Mr. Horne's disfavour,&mdash;for I think of him as well at
+ this moment, and the same in all essential points, as I ever did. He
+ is a man of fine imagination, and is besides good and generous. In the
+ course of our acquaintance (on paper&mdash;for I never saw him) I never was
+ angry with him except once; and then, <i>I</i> was quite wrong and had to
+ confess it. But this is being too 'mediæval.' Only you will see from
+ it that I am a little entangled on the subject of compound works, and
+ must look where I tread ... and you will understand (if you ever hear
+ from Mr. Kenyon or elsewhere that I am going to write a compound-poem
+ with Mr. Horne) how it <i>was</i> true, and isn't true any more.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Yes&mdash;you are going to Mr. Kenyon's on the 12th&mdash;and yes&mdash;my brother
+ and sister are going to meet you and your sister there one day to
+ dinner. Shall I have courage to see you soon, I wonder! If you ask me,
+ I must ask myself. But oh, this make-believe May&mdash;it can't be May
+ after all! If a south-west wind sate in your chestnut tree, it was but
+ for a few hours&mdash;the east wind 'came up this way' by the earliest
+ opportunity of succession. As the old 'mysteries' showed 'Beelzebub
+ with a bearde,' even so has the east wind had a 'bearde' of late, in a
+ full growth of bristling exaggerations&mdash;the English spring-winds have
+ excelled themselves in evil this year; and I have not been down-stairs
+ yet.&mdash;<i>But</i> I am certainly stronger and better than I was&mdash;that is
+ undeniable&mdash;and I <i>shall</i> be better still. You are not going away
+ soon&mdash;are you? In the meantime you do not know what it is to be ... a
+ little afraid of Paracelsus. So right about the Italians! and the
+ 'rose porporine' which made me smile. How is the head?
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">Ever yours,</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">E.B.B.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Is the 'Flight of the Duchess' in the portfolio? Of course you must
+ ring the Bell. That poem has a strong heart in it, to begin <i>so</i>
+ strongly. Poor Hood! And all those thoughts fall mixed together. May
+ God bless you.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3>
+ <i>E.B.B. to R.B.</i>
+</h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Sunday&mdash;in the last hour of it.<br>
+[Post-mark, May 12, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ May I ask how the head is? just under the bag? Mr. Kenyon was here
+ to-day and told me such bad news that I cannot sleep to-night
+ (although I did think once of doing it) without asking such a question
+ as this, dear Mr. Browning.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Let me hear how you are&mdash;Will you? and let me hear (if I can) that it
+ was prudence or some unchristian virtue of the sort, and not a dreary
+ necessity, which made you put aside the engagement for Tuesday&mdash;for
+ Monday. I had been thinking so of seeing you on Tuesday ... with my
+ sister's eyes&mdash;for the first sight.
+</p>
+<p>
+ And now if you have done killing the mules and the dogs, let me have
+ a straight quick arrow for myself, if you please. Just a word, to say
+ how you are. I ask for no more than a word, lest the writing should be
+ hurtful to you.
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">May God bless you always.</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">Your friend,</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">E.B.B.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3>
+ <i>R.B. to E.B.B.</i>
+</h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Monday.<br>
+[Post-mark, May 12, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ My dear, own friend, I am quite well now, or next to it&mdash;but this is
+ how it was,&mdash;I have gone out a great deal of late, and my head took to
+ ringing such a literal alarum that I wondered what was to come of it;
+ and at last, a few evenings ago, as I was dressing for a dinner
+ somewhere, I got really bad of a sudden, and kept at home to my
+ friend's heartrending disappointment. Next morning I was no
+ better&mdash;and it struck me that I should be really disappointing dear
+ kind Mr. Kenyon, and wasting his time, if that engagement, too, were
+ broken with as little warning,&mdash;so I thought it best to forego all
+ hopes of seeing him, at such a risk. And that done, I got rid of every
+ other promise to pay visits for next week and next, and told
+ everybody, with considerable dignity, that my London season was over
+ for this year, as it assuredly is&mdash;and I shall be worried no more, and
+ let walk in the garden, and go to bed at ten o'clock, and get done
+ with what is most expedient to do, and my 'flesh shall come again like
+ a little child's,' and one day, oh the day, I shall see you with my
+ own, own eyes ... for, how little you understand me; or rather,
+ yourself,&mdash;if you think I would dare see you, without your leave, that
+ way! Do you suppose that your power of giving and refusing ends when
+ you have shut your room-door? Did I not tell you I turned down another
+ street, even, the other day, and why not down yours? And often as I
+ see Mr. Kenyon, have I ever dreamed of asking any but the merest
+ conventional questions about you; your health, and no more?
+</p>
+<p>
+ I will answer your letter, the last one, to-morrow&mdash;I have said
+ nothing of what I want to say.
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">Ever yours</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">R.B.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3>
+ <i>R.B. to E.B.B.</i>
+</h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Tuesday Morning.<br>
+[Post-mark, May 13, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ Did I thank you with any effect in the lines I sent yesterday, dear
+ Miss Barrett? I know I felt most thankful, and, of course, began
+ reasoning myself into the impropriety of allowing a 'more' or a 'most'
+ in feelings of that sort towards you. I am thankful for you, all about
+ you&mdash;as, do you not know?
+</p>
+<p>
+ Thank you, from my soul.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Now, let me never pass occasion of speaking well of Horne, who
+ deserves your opinion of him,&mdash;it is my own, too.&mdash;He has unmistakable
+ genius, and is a fine, honest, enthusiastic chivalrous fellow&mdash;it is
+ the fashion to affect to sneer at him, of late, I think&mdash;the people he
+ has praised fancying that they 'pose' themselves sculpturesquely in
+ playing the Greatly Indifferent, and the other kind shaking each
+ other's hands in hysterical congratulations at having escaped such a
+ dishonour: <i>I</i> feel grateful to him, I know, for his generous
+ criticism, and glad and proud of in any way approaching such a man's
+ standard of poetical height. And he might be a disappointed man
+ too,&mdash;for the players trifled with and teased out his very nature,
+ which has a strange aspiration for the horrible tin-and-lacquer
+ 'crown' they give one from their clouds (of smooth shaven deal done
+ over blue)&mdash;and he don't give up the bad business yet, but thinks a
+ 'small' theatre would somehow not be a theatre, and an actor not quite
+ an actor ... I forget in what way, but the upshot is, he bates not a
+ jot in that rouged, wigged, padded, empty-headed, heartless tribe of
+ grimacers that came and canted me; not I, them;&mdash;a thing he cannot
+ understand&mdash;<i>so</i>, I am not the one he would have picked out to
+ praise, had he not been <i>loyal</i>. I know he admires your poetry
+ properly. God help him, and send some great artist from the country,
+ (who can read and write beside comprehending Shakspeare, and who
+ 'exasperates his H's' when the feat is to be done)&mdash;to undertake the
+ part of Cosmo, or Gregory, or what shall most soothe his spirit! The
+ subject of your play is tempting indeed&mdash;and reminds one of that wild
+ Drama of Calderon's which frightened Shelley just before his
+ death&mdash;also, of Fuseli's theory with reference to his own Picture of
+ Macbeth in the witches' cave ... wherein the apparition of the armed
+ head from the cauldron is Macbeth's own.
+</p>
+<p>
+ 'If you ask me, I must ask myself'&mdash;that is, when I am to see you&mdash;I
+ will <i>never</i> ask you! You do <i>not</i> know what I shall estimate that
+ permission at,&mdash;nor do I, quite&mdash;but you do&mdash;do not you? know so much
+ of me as to make my 'asking' worse than a form&mdash;I do not 'ask' you to
+ write to me&mdash;not <i>directly</i> ask, at least.
+</p>
+<p>
+ I will tell you&mdash;I ask you <i>not</i> to see me so long as you are unwell,
+ or mistrustful of&mdash;
+</p>
+<p>
+ No, no, that is being too grand! Do see me when you can, and let me
+ not be only writing myself
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">Yours&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">R.B.
+</p>
+<p>
+ A kind, so kind, note from Mr. Kenyon came. We, I and my sister, are
+ to go in June instead.... I shall go nowhere till then; I am nearly
+ well&mdash;all save one little wheel in my head that keeps on its
+</p>
+<center>
+<img src="images/image01a.png" width="150" height="81"
+alt="Music: bass clef, B-flat, sostenuto">
+</center>
+<!--IMAGE END-->
+<p>
+ That you are better I am most thankful.
+</p>
+<p>
+ 'Next letter' to say how you must help me with all my new Romances and
+ Lyrics, and Lays and Plays, and read them and heed them and end them
+ and mend them!
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3>
+ <i>E.B.B. to R.B.</i>
+</h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Thursday.<br>
+[Post-mark, May 16, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ But how 'mistrustfulness'? And how 'that way?' What have I said or
+ done, <i>I</i>, who am not apt to <i>be</i> mistrustful of anybody and should be
+ a miraculous monster if I began with <i>you</i>! What can I have said, I
+ say to myself again and again.
+</p>
+<p>
+ One thing, at any rate, I have done, 'that way' or this way! I have
+ made what is vulgarly called a 'piece of work' about little; or seemed
+ to make it. Forgive me. I am shy by nature:&mdash;and by position and
+ experience, ... by having had my nerves shaken to excess, and by
+ leading a life of such seclusion, ... by these things together and by
+ others besides, I have appeared shy and ungrateful to you. Only not
+ mistrustful. You could not mean to judge me so. Mistrustful people do
+ not write as I write, surely! for wasn't it a Richelieu or Mazarin (or
+ who?) who said that with five lines from anyone's hand, he could take
+ off his head for a corollary? I think so.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Well!&mdash;but this is to prove that I am not mistrustful, and to say,
+ that if you care to come to see me you can come; and that it is my
+ gain (as I feel it to be) and not yours, whenever you do come. You
+ will not talk of having come afterwards I know, because although I am
+ 'fast bound' to see one or two persons this summer (besides yourself,
+ whom I receive of choice and willingly) I <i>cannot</i> admit visitors in a
+ general way&mdash;and putting the question of health quite aside, it would
+ be unbecoming to lie here on the sofa and make a company-show of an
+ infirmity, and hold a beggar's hat for sympathy. I should blame it in
+ another woman&mdash;and the sense of it has had its weight with me
+ sometimes.
+</p>
+<p>
+ For the rest, ... when you write, that <i>I</i> do not know how you would
+ value, &amp;c. <i>nor yourself quite</i>, you touch very accurately on the
+ truth ... and <i>so</i> accurately in the last clause, that to read it,
+ made me smile 'tant bien que mal.' Certainly you cannot 'quite know,'
+ or know at all, whether the least straw of pleasure can go to you from
+ knowing me otherwise than on this paper&mdash;and I, for my part, 'quite
+ know' my own honest impression, dear Mr. Browning, that none is likely
+ to go to you. There is nothing to see in me; nor to hear in me&mdash;I
+ never learnt to talk as you do in London; although I can admire that
+ brightness of carved speech in Mr. Kenyon and others. If my poetry is
+ worth anything to any eye, it is the flower of me. I have lived most
+ and been most happy in it, and so it has all my colours; the rest of
+ me is nothing but a root, fit for the ground and the dark. And if I
+ write all this egotism, ... it is for shame; and because I feel
+ ashamed of having made a fuss about what is not worth it; and because
+ you are extravagant in caring so for a permission, which will be
+ nothing to you afterwards. Not that I am not touched by your caring so
+ at all! I am deeply touched now; and presently, ... I shall
+ understand. Come then. There will be truth and simplicity for you in
+ any case; and a friend. And do not answer this&mdash;I do not write it as a
+ fly trap for compliments. Your spider would scorn me for it too much.
+ Also, ... as to the how and when. You are not well now, and it cannot
+ be good for you to do anything but be quiet and keep away that
+ dreadful musical note in the head. I entreat you not to think of
+ coming until <i>that</i> is all put to silence satisfactorily. When it is
+ done, ... you must choose whether you would like best to come with Mr.
+ Kenyon or to come alone&mdash;and if you would come alone, you must just
+ tell me on what day, and I will see you on any day unless there should
+ be an unforeseen obstacle, ... any day after two, or before six. And
+ my sister will bring you up-stairs to me; and we will talk; or <i>you</i>
+ will talk; and you will try to be indulgent, and like me as well as
+ you can. If, on the other hand, you would rather come with Mr. Kenyon,
+ you must wait, I imagine, till June,&mdash;because he goes away on Monday
+ and is not likely immediately to return&mdash;no, on Saturday, to-morrow.
+</p>
+<p>
+ In the meantime, why I should be '<i>thanked</i>,' is an absolute mystery
+ to me&mdash;but I leave it!
+</p>
+<p>
+ You are generous and impetuous; <i>that</i>, I can see and feel; and so far
+ from being of an inclination to mistrust you or distrust you, I do
+ profess to have as much faith in your full, pure loyalty, as if I had
+ known you personally as many years as I have appreciated your genius.
+ Believe this of me&mdash;for it is spoken truly.
+</p>
+<p>
+ In the matter of Shakespeare's 'poor players' you are severe&mdash;and yet
+ I was glad to hear you severe&mdash;it is a happy excess, I think. When men
+ of intense reality, as all great poets must be, give their hearts to
+ be trodden on and tied up with ribbons in turn, by men of masks, there
+ will be torture if there is not desecration. Not that I know much of
+ such things&mdash;but I have <i>heard</i>. Heard from Mr. Kenyon; heard from
+ Miss Mitford; who however is passionately fond of the theatre as a
+ writer's medium&mdash;<i>not at all</i>, from Mr. Horne himself, ... except what
+ he has printed on the subject.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Yes&mdash;he has been infamously used on the point of the 'New
+ Spirit'&mdash;only he should have been prepared for the infamy&mdash;it was
+ leaping into a gulph, ... not to 'save the republic,' but '<i>pour
+ rire</i>': it was not merely putting one's foot into a hornet's nest, but
+ taking off a shoe and stocking to do it. And to think of Dickens being
+ dissatisfied! To think of Tennyson's friends grumbling!&mdash;he himself
+ did not, I hope and trust. For you, you certainly were not adequately
+ treated&mdash;and above all, you were not placed with your <i>peers</i> in that
+ chapter&mdash;but that there was an intention to do you justice, and that
+ there <i>is</i> a righteous appreciation of you in the writer, I know and
+ am sure,&mdash;and that <i>you</i> should be sensible to this, is only what I
+ should know and be sure of <i>you</i>. Mr. Horne is quite above the narrow,
+ vicious, hateful jealousy of contemporaries, which we hear reproached,
+ too justly sometimes, on men of letters.
+</p>
+<p>
+ I go on writing as if I were not going to see you&mdash;soon perhaps.
+ Remember that the how and the when rest with you&mdash;except that it
+ cannot be before next week at the soonest. You are to decide.
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">Always your friend,</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">E.B.B.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3>
+ <i>R.B. to E.B.B.</i>
+</h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Friday Night.<br>
+[Post-mark, May 17, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ My friend is not 'mistrustful' of me, no, because she don't fear I
+ shall make mainprize of the stray cloaks and umbrellas down-stairs, or
+ turn an article for <i>Colburn's</i> on her sayings and doings
+ up-stairs,&mdash;but spite of that, she does mistrust ... <i>so</i> mistrust my
+ common sense,&mdash;nay, uncommon and dramatic-poet's sense, if I am put on
+ asserting it!&mdash;all which pieces of mistrust I could detect, and catch
+ struggling, and pin to death in a moment, and put a label in, with
+ name, genus and species, just like a horrible entomologist; only I
+ won't, because the first visit of the Northwind will carry the whole
+ tribe into the Red Sea&mdash;and those horns and tails and scalewings are
+ best forgotten altogether. And now will I say a cutting thing and have
+ done. Have I trusted <i>my</i> friend so,&mdash;or said even to myself, much
+ less to her, she is even as&mdash;'Mr. Simpson' who desireth the honour of
+ the acquaintance of Mr. B. whose admirable works have long been his,
+ Simpson's, especial solace in private&mdash;and who accordingly is led to
+ that personage by a mutual friend&mdash;Simpson blushing as only adorable
+ ingenuousness can, and twisting the brim of his hat like a sailor
+ giving evidence. Whereupon Mr. B. beginneth by remarking that the
+ rooms are growing hot&mdash;or that he supposes Mr. S. has not heard if
+ there will be another adjournment of the House to-night&mdash;whereupon Mr.
+ S. looketh up all at once, brusheth the brim smooth again with his
+ sleeve, and takes to his assurance once more, in something of a huff,
+ and after staying his five minutes out for decency's sake, noddeth
+ familiarly an adieu, and spinning round on his heel ejaculateth
+ mentally&mdash;'Well, I <i>did</i> expect to see something different from that
+ little yellow commonplace man ... and, now I come to think, there
+ <i>was</i> some precious trash in that book of his'&mdash;Have <i>I</i> said 'so will
+ Miss Barrett ejaculate?'
+</p>
+<p>
+ Dear Miss Barrett, I thank you for the leave you give me, and for the
+ infinite kindness of the way of giving it. I will call at 2 on
+ Tuesday&mdash;not sooner, that you may have time to write should any
+ adverse circumstances happen ... not that they need inconvenience you,
+ because ... what I want particularly to tell you for now and
+ hereafter&mdash;do not mind my coming in the least, but&mdash;should you be
+ unwell, for instance,&mdash;just send or leave word, and I will come again,
+ and again, and again&mdash;my time is of <i>no</i> importance, and I have
+ acquaintances thick in the vicinity.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Now if I do not seem grateful enough to you, <i>am</i> I so much to blame?
+ You see it is high time you <i>saw</i> me, for I have clearly written
+ myself <i>out</i>!
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">Ever yours,</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">R.B.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3>
+ <i>E.B.B. to R.B.</i>
+</h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Saturday.<br>
+[Post-mark, May 17, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ I shall be ready on Tuesday I hope, but I hate and protest against
+ your horrible 'entomology.' Beginning to explain, would thrust me
+ lower and lower down the circles of some sort of an 'Inferno'; only
+ with my dying breath I would maintain that I never could, consciously
+ or unconsciously, mean to distrust you; or, the least in the world, to
+ Simpsonize you. What I said, ... it was <i>you</i> that put it into my head
+ to say it&mdash;for certainly, in my usual disinclination to receive
+ visitors, such a feeling does not enter. There, now! There, I am a
+ whole 'giro' lower! Now, you will say perhaps that I distrust <i>you</i>,
+ and nobody else! So it is best to be silent, and bear all the 'cutting
+ things' with resignation! <i>that</i> is certain.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Still I must really say, under this dreadful incubus-charge of
+ Simpsonism, ... that you, who know everything, or at least make awful
+ guesses at everything in one's feelings and motives, and profess to be
+ able to pin them down in a book of classified inscriptions, ... should
+ have been able to understand better, or misunderstand less, in a
+ matter like this&mdash;Yes! I think so. I think you should have made out
+ the case in some such way as it was in nature&mdash;viz. that you had
+ lashed yourself up to an exorbitant wishing to see me, ... (you who
+ could see, any day, people who are a hundredfold and to all social
+ purposes, my superiors!) because I was unfortunate enough to be shut
+ up in a room and silly enough to make a fuss about opening the door;
+ and that I grew suddenly abashed by the consciousness of this. How
+ different from a distrust of <i>you</i>! how different!
+</p>
+<p>
+ Ah&mdash;if, after this day, you ever see any interpretable sign of
+ distrustfulness in me, you may be 'cutting' again, and I will not cry
+ out. In the meantime here is a fact for your 'entomology.' I have not
+ so much <i>distrust</i>, as will make a <i>doubt</i>, as will make a <i>curiosity</i>
+ for next Tuesday. Not the simplest modification of <i>curiosity</i> enters
+ into the state of feeling with which I wait for Tuesday:&mdash;and if you
+ are angry to hear me say so, ... why, you are more unjust than ever.
+</p>
+<p>
+ (Let it be three instead of two&mdash;if the hour be as convenient to
+ yourself.)
+</p>
+<p>
+ Before you come, try to forgive me for my 'infinite kindness' in the
+ manner of consenting to see you. Is it 'the cruellest cut of all' when
+ you talk of infinite kindness, yet attribute such villainy to me?
+ Well! but we are friends till Tuesday&mdash;and after perhaps.
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">Ever yours,</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">E.B.B.
+</p>
+<p>
+ If on Tuesday you should be not well, <i>pray do not come</i>&mdash;Now, that is
+ my request to your kindness.<a href="#note-16"><b>16</b></a>
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3>
+ <i>R.B. to E.B.B.</i>
+</h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Tuesday Evening.<br>
+[Post-mark, May 21, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ I trust to you for a true account of how you are&mdash;if tired, if not
+ tired, if I did wrong in any thing,&mdash;or, if you please, <i>right</i> in any
+ thing&mdash;(only, not one more word about my 'kindness,' which, to get
+ done with, I will grant is exceptive)&mdash;but, let us so arrange matters
+ if possible,&mdash;and why should it not be&mdash;that my great happiness, such
+ as it will be if I see you, as this morning, from time to time, may be
+ obtained at the cost of as little inconvenience to you as we can
+ contrive. For an instance&mdash;just what strikes me&mdash;they all say here I
+ speak very loud&mdash;(a trick caught from having often to talk with a deaf
+ relative of mine). And did I stay too long?
+</p>
+<p>
+ I will tell <i>you</i> unhesitatingly of such 'corrigenda'&mdash;nay, I will
+ again say, do not humiliate me&mdash;<i>do not</i> again,&mdash;by calling me 'kind'
+ in that way.
+</p>
+<p>
+ I am proud and happy in your friendship&mdash;now and ever. May God bless
+ you!
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">R.B.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3>
+ <i>E.B.B. to R.B.</i>
+</h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Wednesday Morning.<br>
+[Post-mark, May 22, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ Indeed there was nothing wrong&mdash;how could there be? And there was
+ everything right&mdash;as how should there not be? And as for the 'loud
+ speaking,' I did not hear any&mdash;and, instead of being worse, I ought to
+ be better for what was certainly (to speak it, or be silent of it,)
+ happiness and honour to me yesterday.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Which reminds me to observe that you are so restricting our
+ vocabulary, as to be ominous of silence in a full sense, presently.
+ First, one word is not to be spoken&mdash;and then, another is not. And
+ why? Why deny me the use of such words as have natural feelings
+ belonging to them&mdash;and how can the use of such be 'humiliating' to
+ <i>you</i>? If my heart were open to you, you could see nothing offensive
+ to you in any thought there or trace of thought that has been
+ there&mdash;but it is hard for you to understand, with all your psychology
+ (and to be reminded of it I have just been looking at the preface of
+ some poems by some Mr. Gurney where he speaks of 'the reflective
+ wisdom of a Wordsworth and the profound psychological utterances of a
+ Browning') it is hard for you to understand what my mental position is
+ after the peculiar experience I have suffered, and what <span title="ti emoi kai soi">&tau;&iota; &epsilon;&mu;&omicron;&iota; &kappa;&alpha;&iota; &sigma;&omicron;&iota;</span><b><a href="#note-17">17</a></b> a sort of feeling is irrepressible from me to you,
+ when, from the height of your brilliant happy sphere, you ask, as you
+ did ask, for personal intercourse with me. What words but 'kindness'
+ ... but 'gratitude'&mdash;but I will not in any case be <i>un</i>kind and
+ <i>un</i>grateful, and do what is displeasing to you. And let us both leave
+ the subject with the words&mdash;because we perceive in it from different
+ points of view; we stand on the black and white sides of the shield;
+ and there is no coming to a conclusion.
+</p>
+<p>
+ But you will come really on Tuesday&mdash;and again, when you like and can
+ together&mdash;and it will not be more 'inconvenient' to me to be pleased,
+ I suppose, than it is to people in general&mdash;will it, do you think?
+ Ah&mdash;how you misjudge! Why it must obviously and naturally be
+ delightful to me to receive you here when you like to come, and it
+ cannot be necessary for me to say so in set words&mdash;believe it of
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">Your friend,</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">E.B.B.
+</p>
+<p>
+ [Mr. Browning's letter, to which the following is in answer was
+ destroyed, see <a href="#268">page 268</a> of the present volume.]
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3>
+ <i>E.B.B. to R.B.</i>
+</h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Friday Evening.<br>
+[Post-mark, May 24, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ I intended to write to you last night and this morning, and could
+ not,&mdash;you do not know what pain you give me in speaking so wildly. And
+ if I disobey you, my dear friend, in speaking, (I for my part) of your
+ wild speaking, I do it, not to displease you, but to be in my own
+ eyes, and before God, a little more worthy, or less unworthy, of a
+ generosity from which I recoil by instinct and at the first glance,
+ yet conclusively; and because my silence would be the most disloyal of
+ all means of expression, in reference to it. Listen to me then in
+ this. You have said some intemperate things ... fancies,&mdash;which you
+ will not say over again, nor unsay, but <i>forget at once</i>, and <i>for
+ ever, having said at all</i>; and which (so) will die out between <i>you
+ and me alone</i>, like a misprint between you and the printer. And this
+ you will do <i>for my sake</i> who am your friend (and you have none
+ truer)&mdash;and this I ask, because it is a condition necessary to our
+ future liberty of intercourse. You remember&mdash;surely you do&mdash;that I am
+ in the most exceptional of positions; and that, just <i>because of it</i>,
+ I am able to receive you as I did on Tuesday; and that, for me to
+ listen to 'unconscious exaggerations,' is as unbecoming to the
+ humilities of my position, as unpropitious (which is of more
+ consequence) to the prosperities of yours. Now, if there should be one
+ word of answer attempted to this; or of reference; <i>I must not</i> ... I
+ <i>will not see you again</i>&mdash;and you will justify me later in your heart.
+ So for my sake you will not say it&mdash;I think you will not&mdash;and spare me
+ the sadness of having to break through an intercourse just as it is
+ promising pleasure to me; to me who have so many sadnesses and so few
+ pleasures. You will!&mdash;and I need not be uneasy&mdash;and I shall owe you
+ that tranquillity, as one gift of many. For, that I have much to
+ receive from you in all the free gifts of thinking, teaching,
+ master-spirits, ... <i>that</i>, I know!&mdash;it is my own praise that I
+ appreciate you, as none can more. Your influence and help in poetry
+ will be full of good and gladness to me&mdash;for with many to love me in
+ this house, there is no one to judge me ... <i>now</i>. Your friendship and
+ sympathy will be dear and precious to me all my life, if you indeed
+ leave them with me so long or so little. Your mistakes in me ... which
+ <i>I</i> cannot mistake (&mdash;and which have humbled me by too much
+ honouring&mdash;) I put away gently, and with grateful tears in my eyes;
+ because <i>all that hail</i> will beat down and spoil crowns, as well as
+ 'blossoms.'
+</p>
+<p>
+ If I put off next Tuesday to the week after&mdash;I mean your visit,&mdash;shall
+ you care much? For the relations I named to you, are to be in London
+ next week; and I am to see one of my aunts whom I love, and have not
+ met since my great affliction&mdash;and it will all seem to come over
+ again, and I shall be out of spirits and nerves. On Tuesday week you
+ can bring a tomahawk and do the criticism, and I shall try to have my
+ courage ready for it&mdash;Oh, you will do me so much good&mdash;and Mr. Kenyon
+ calls me 'docile' sometimes I assure you; when he wants to flatter me
+ out of being obstinate&mdash;and in good earnest, I believe I shall do
+ everything you tell me. The 'Prometheus' is done&mdash;but the monodrama is
+ where it was&mdash;and the novel, not at all. But I think of some half
+ promises half given, about something I read for 'Saul'&mdash;and the
+ 'Flight of the Duchess'&mdash;where is she?
+</p>
+<p>
+ You are not displeased with me? <i>no, that</i> would be hail and lightning
+ together&mdash;I do not write as I might, of some words of yours&mdash;but you
+ know that I am not a stone, even if silent like one. And if in the
+ <i>un</i>silence, I have said one word to vex you, pity me for having had
+ to say it&mdash;and for the rest, may God bless you far beyond the reach of
+ vexation from my words or my deeds!
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">Your friend in grateful regard,</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">E.B.B.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3>
+ <i>R.B. to E.B.B.</i>
+</h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Saturday Morning.<br>
+[Post-mark, May 24, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ Don't you remember I told you, once on a time that you 'knew nothing
+ of me'? whereat you demurred&mdash;but I meant what I said, and knew it was
+ so. To be grand in a simile, for every poor speck of a Vesuvius or a
+ Stromboli in my microcosm there are huge layers of ice and pits of
+ black cold water&mdash;and I make the most of my two or three fire-eyes,
+ because I know by experience, alas, how these tend to extinction&mdash;and
+ the ice grows and grows&mdash;still this last is true part of me, most
+ characteristic part, <i>best</i> part perhaps, and I disown
+ nothing&mdash;only,&mdash;when you talked of '<i>knowing</i> me'! Still, I am utterly
+ unused, of these late years particularly, to dream of communicating
+ anything about <i>that</i> to another person (all my writings are purely
+ dramatic as I am always anxious to say) that when I make never so
+ little an attempt, no wonder if I <i>bungle</i> notably&mdash;'language,' too is
+ an organ that never studded this heavy heavy head of mine. Will you
+ not think me very brutal if I tell you I could almost smile at your
+ misapprehension of what I meant to write?&mdash;Yet I <i>will</i> tell you,
+ because it will undo the bad effect of my thoughtlessness, and at the
+ same time exemplify the point I have all along been honestly earnest
+ to set you right upon ... my real inferiority to you; just that and no
+ more. I wrote to you, in an unwise moment, on the spur of being again
+ 'thanked,' and, unwisely writing just as if thinking to myself, said
+ what must have looked absurd enough as seen apart from the horrible
+ counterbalancing never-to-be-written <i>rest of me</i>&mdash;by the side of
+ which, could it be written and put before you, my note would sink to
+ its proper and relative place, and become a mere 'thank you' for your
+ good opinion&mdash;which I assure you is far too generous&mdash;for I really
+ believe you to be my superior in many respects, and feel uncomfortable
+ till <i>you</i> see that, too&mdash;since I hope for your sympathy and
+ assistance, and 'frankness is everything in such a case.' I do assure
+ you, that had you read my note, <i>only</i> having '<i>known</i>' so much of me
+ as is implied in having inspected, for instance, the contents, merely,
+ of that fatal and often-referred-to 'portfolio' there (<i>Dii meliora
+ piis!</i>), you would see in it, (the note not the portfolio) the
+ blandest utterance ever mild gentleman gave birth to. But I forgot
+ that one may make too much noise in a silent place by playing the few
+ notes on the 'ear-piercing fife' which in Othello's regimental band
+ might have been thumped into decent subordination by his
+ 'spirit-stirring drum'&mdash;to say nothing of gong and ophicleide. Will
+ you forgive me, on promise to remember for the future, and be more
+ considerate? Not that you must too much despise me, neither; nor, of
+ all things, apprehend I am attitudinizing à la Byron, and giving you
+ to understand unutterable somethings, longings for Lethe and all
+ that&mdash;far from it! I never committed murders, and sleep the soundest
+ of sleeps&mdash;but 'the heart is desperately wicked,' that is true, and
+ though I dare not say 'I know' mine, yet I have had signal
+ opportunities, I who began life from the beginning, and can forget
+ nothing (but names, and the date of the battle of Waterloo), and have
+ known good and wicked men and women, gentle and simple, shaking hands
+ with Edmund Kean and Father Mathew, you and&mdash;Ottima! Then, I had a
+ certain faculty of self-consciousness, years and years ago, at which
+ John Mill wondered, and which ought to be improved by this time, if
+ constant use helps at all&mdash;and, meaning, on the whole, to be a Poet,
+ if not <i>the</i> Poet ... for I am vain and ambitious some nights,&mdash;I do
+ myself justice, and dare call things by their names to myself, and say
+ boldly, this I love, this I hate, this I would do, this I would not
+ do, under all kinds of circumstances,&mdash;and talking (thinking) in this
+ style <i>to myself</i>, and beginning, however tremblingly, in spite of
+ conviction, to write in this style <i>for myself</i>&mdash;on the top of the
+ desk which contains my 'Songs of the Poets&mdash;<SPAN class="sc-ex">no. i</span> M.P.', I
+ wrote,&mdash;what you now forgive, I know! Because I am, from my heart,
+ sorry that by a foolish fit of inconsideration I should have given
+ pain for a minute to you, towards whom, on every account, I would
+ rather soften and 'sleeken every word as to a bird' ... (and, not such
+ a bird as my black self that go screeching about the world for 'dead
+ horse'&mdash;corvus (picus)&mdash;mirandola!) I, too, who have been at such
+ pains to acquire the reputation I enjoy in the world,&mdash;(ask Mr.
+ Kenyon,) and who dine, and wine, and dance and enhance the company's
+ pleasure till they make me ill and I keep house, as of late: Mr.
+ Kenyon, (for I only quote where you may verify if you please) <i>he</i>
+ says my common sense strikes him, and its contrast with my muddy
+ metaphysical poetry! And so it shall strike you&mdash;for though I am glad
+ that, since you <i>did</i> misunderstand me, you said so, and have given me
+ an opportunity of doing by another way what I wished to do in
+ <i>that</i>,&mdash;yet, if you had <i>not</i> alluded to my writing, as I meant you
+ should not, you would have certainly understood <i>something</i> of its
+ drift when you found me next Tuesday precisely the same quiet (no, for
+ I feel I speak too loudly, in spite of your kind disclaimer, but&mdash;)
+ the same mild man-about-town you were gracious to, the other
+ morning&mdash;for, indeed, my own way of worldly life is marked out long
+ ago, as precisely as yours can be, and I am set going with a hand,
+ winker-wise, on each side of my head, and a directing finger before my
+ eyes, to say nothing of an instinctive dread I have that a certain
+ whip-lash is vibrating somewhere in the neighbourhood in playful
+ readiness! So 'I hope here be proofs,' Dogberry's satisfaction that,
+ first, I am but a very poor creature compared to you and entitled by
+ my wants to look up to you,&mdash;all I meant to say from the first of the
+ first&mdash;and that, next, I shall be too much punished if, for this piece
+ of mere inconsideration, you deprive me, more or less, or sooner or
+ later, of the pleasure of seeing you,&mdash;a little over boisterous
+ gratitude for which, perhaps, caused all the mischief! The reasons you
+ give for deferring my visits next week are too cogent for me to
+ dispute&mdash;that is too true&mdash;and, being now and henceforward 'on my good
+ behaviour,' I will at once cheerfully submit to them, if needs
+ must&mdash;but should your mere kindness and forethought, as I half
+ suspect, have induced you to take such a step, you will now smile with
+ me, at this new and very unnecessary addition to the 'fears of me' I
+ have got so triumphantly over in your case! Wise man, was I not, to
+ clench my first favourable impression so adroitly ... like a recent
+ Cambridge worthy, my sister heard of; who, being on his theological
+ (or rather, scripture-historical) examination, was asked by the Tutor,
+ who wished to let him off easily, 'who was the first King of
+ Israel?'&mdash;'Saul' answered the trembling youth. 'Good!' nodded
+ approvingly the Tutor. 'Otherwise called <i>Paul</i>,' subjoined the youth
+ in his elation! Now I have begged pardon, and blushingly assured you
+ <i>that</i> was only a slip of the tongue, and that I did really <i>mean</i> all
+ the while, (Paul or no Paul), the veritable son of Kish, he that owned
+ the asses, and found listening to the harp the best of all things for
+ an evil spirit! Pray write me a line to say, 'Oh ... if <i>that's</i> all!'
+ and remember me for good (which is very compatible with a moment's
+ stupidity) and let me not for one fault, (and that the only one that
+ shall be), lose <i>any pleasure</i> ... for your friendship I am sure I
+ have not lost&mdash;God bless you, my dear friend!
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right"><SPAN class="sc-ex">R. Browning</span>.
+</p>
+<p>
+ And by the way, will it not be better, as co-operating with you more
+ effectually in your kind promise to forget the 'printer's error' in my
+ blotted proof, to send me back that same 'proof,' if you have not
+ inflicted proper and summary justice on it? When Mephistopheles last
+ came to see us in this world outside here, he counselled sundry of us
+ 'never to write a letter,&mdash;and never to burn one'&mdash;do you know that?
+ But I never mind what I am told! Seriously, I am ashamed.... I shall
+ next ask a servant for my paste in the 'high fantastical' style of my
+ own 'Luria.'
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3>
+ <i>E.B.B. to R.B.</i>
+</h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Sunday<br>
+[May 25, 1845].
+</p>
+<p>
+ I owe you the most humble of apologies dear Mr. Browning, for having
+ spent so much solemnity on so simple a matter, and I hasten to pay it;
+ confessing at the same time (as why should I not?) that I am quite as
+ much ashamed of myself as I ought to be, which is not a little. You
+ will find it difficult to believe me perhaps when I assure you that I
+ never made such a mistake (I mean of over-seriousness to indefinite
+ compliments), no, never in my life before&mdash;indeed my sisters have
+ often jested with me (in matters of which they were cognizant) on my
+ supernatural indifference to the superlative degree in general, as if
+ it meant nothing in grammar. I usually know well that 'boots' may be
+ called for in this world of ours, just as you called for yours; and
+ that to bring '<i>Bootes</i>,' were the vilest of mal-à-pro-pos-ities.
+ Also, I should have understood 'boots' where you wrote it, in the
+ letter in question; if it had not been for <i>the relation of two
+ things</i> in it&mdash;and now I perfectly seem to see <i>how</i> I mistook that
+ relation; ('<i>seem to see</i>'; because I have not looked into the letter
+ again since your last night's commentary, and will not&mdash;) inasmuch as
+ I have observed before in my own mind, that a good deal of what is
+ called obscurity in you, arises from a habit of very subtle
+ association; so subtle, that you are probably unconscious of it, ...
+ and the effect of which is to throw together on the same level and in
+ the same light, things of likeness and unlikeness&mdash;till the reader
+ grows confused as I did, and takes one for another. I may say however,
+ in a poor justice to myself, that I wrote what I wrote so
+ unfortunately, <i>through reverence for you</i>, and not at all from vanity
+ in my own account ... although I do feel palpably while I write these
+ words here and now, that I might as well leave them unwritten; for
+ that no man of the world who ever lived in the world (not even <i>you</i>)
+ could be expected to believe them, though said, sung, and sworn.
+</p>
+<p>
+ For the rest, it is scarcely an apposite moment for you to talk, even
+ 'dramatically,' of my 'superiority' to you, ... unless you mean, which
+ perhaps you do mean, my superiority in <i>simplicity</i>&mdash;and, verily, to
+ some of the 'adorable ingenuousness,' sacred to the shade of Simpson,
+ I may put in a modest claim, ... 'and have my claim allowed.' 'Pray do
+ not mock me' I quote again from your Shakespeare to you who are a
+ dramatic poet; ... and I will admit anything that you like, (being
+ humble just now)&mdash;even that I <i>did not know you</i>. I was certainly
+ innocent of the knowledge of the 'ice and cold water' you introduce me
+ to, and am only just shaking my head, as Flush would, after a first
+ wholesome plunge. Well&mdash;if I do not know you, I shall learn, I
+ suppose, in time. I am ready to try humbly to learn&mdash;and I may
+ perhaps&mdash;if you are not done in Sanscrit, which is too hard for me,
+ ... notwithstanding that I had the pleasure yesterday to hear, from
+ America, of my profound skill in 'various languages less known than
+ Hebrew'!&mdash;a liberal paraphrase on Mr. Horne's large fancies on the
+ like subject, and a satisfactory reputation in itself&mdash;as long as it
+ is not necessary to deserve it. So I here enclose to you your letter
+ back again, as you wisely desire; although you never could doubt, I
+ hope, for a moment, of its safety with me in the completest of senses:
+ and then, from the heights of my superior ... stultity, and other
+ qualities of the like order, ... I venture to advise you ... however
+ (to speak of the letter critically, and as the dramatic composition it
+ is) it is to be admitted to be very beautiful, and well worthy of the
+ rest of its kin in the portfolio, ... 'Lays of the Poets,' or
+ otherwise, ... I venture to advise you to burn it at once. And then,
+ my dear friend, I ask you (having some claim) to burn at the same time
+ the letter I was fortunate enough to write to you on Friday, and this
+ present one&mdash;don't send them back to me; I hate to have letters sent
+ back&mdash;but burn them for me and never mind Mephistopheles. After which
+ friendly turn, you will do me the one last kindness of forgetting all
+ this exquisite nonsense, and of refraining from mentioning it, by
+ breath or pen, <i>to me or another</i>. Now I trust you so far:&mdash;you will
+ put it with the date of the battle of Waterloo&mdash;and I, with every date
+ in chronology; seeing that I can remember none of them. And we will
+ shuffle the cards and take patience, and begin the game again, if you
+ please&mdash;and I shall bear in mind that you are a dramatic poet, which
+ is not the same thing, by any means, with <i>us</i> of the primitive
+ simplicities, who don't tread on cothurns nor shift the mask in the
+ scene. And I will reverence you both as 'a poet' and as '<i>the</i> poet';
+ because it is no false 'ambition,' but a right you have&mdash;and one which
+ those who live longest, will see justified to the uttermost.... In the
+ meantime I need not ask Mr. Kenyon if you have any sense, because I
+ have no doubt that you have quite sense enough&mdash;and even if I had a
+ doubt, I shall prefer judging for myself without interposition; which
+ I can do, you know, as long as you like to come and see me. And you
+ can come this week if you do like it&mdash;because our relations don't come
+ till the end of it, it appears&mdash;not that I made a pretence 'out of
+ kindness'&mdash;pray don't judge me so outrageously&mdash;but if you like to
+ come ... not on Tuesday ... but on Wednesday at three o'clock, I shall
+ be very glad to see you; and I, for one, shall have forgotten
+ everything by that time; being quick at forgetting my own faults
+ usually. If Wednesday does not suit you, I am not sure that I <i>can</i>
+ see you this week&mdash;but it depends on circumstances. Only don't think
+ yourself <i>obliged</i> to come on Wednesday. You know I <i>began</i> by
+ entreating you to be open and sincere with me&mdash;and no more&mdash;I
+ <i>require</i> no 'sleekening of every word.' I love the truth and can bear
+ it&mdash;whether in word or deed&mdash;and those who have known me longest would
+ tell you so fullest. Well!&mdash;May God bless you. We shall know each
+ other some day perhaps&mdash;and I am
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">Always and faithfully your friend,</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">E.B.B.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3>
+ <i>R.B. to E.B.B.</i>
+</h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">[Post-mark, May 26, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ Nay&mdash;I <i>must</i> have last word&mdash;as all people in the wrong desire to
+ have&mdash;and then, no more of the subject. You said I had given you
+ <i>great pain</i>&mdash;so long as I stop <i>that</i>, think anything of me you
+ choose or can! But <i>before</i> your former letter came, I saw the
+ pre-ordained uselessness of mine. Speaking is to some <i>end</i>, (apart
+ from foolish self-relief, which, after all, I can do without)&mdash;and
+ where there is <i>no</i> end&mdash;you see! or, to finish
+ characteristically&mdash;since the offering to cut off one's right-hand to
+ save anybody a headache, is in vile taste, even for our melodramas,
+ seeing that it was never yet believed in on the stage or off it,&mdash;how
+ much worse to really make the ugly chop, and afterwards come
+ sheepishly in, one's arm in a black sling, and find that the
+ delectable gift had changed aching to nausea! There! And now, 'exit,
+ prompt-side, nearest door, Luria'&mdash;and enter R.B.&mdash;next Wednesday,&mdash;as
+ boldly as he suspects most people do just after they have been soundly
+ frightened!
+</p>
+<p>
+ I shall be most happy to see you on the day and at the hour you
+ mention.
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">God bless you, my dear friend,</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">R.B.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3>
+ <i>E.B.B. to R.B.</i>
+</h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Monday Morning.<br>
+[Post-mark, May 27, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ You will think me the most changeable of all the changeable; but
+ indeed it is <i>not</i> my fault that I cannot, as I wished, receive you on
+ Wednesday. There was a letter this morning; and our friends not only
+ come to London but come to this house on Tuesday (to-morrow) to pass
+ two or three days, until they settle in an hotel for the rest of the
+ season. Therefore you see, it is doubtful whether the two days may not
+ be three, and the three days four; but if they go away in time, and
+ if Saturday should suit you, I will let you know by a word; and you
+ can answer by a yea or nay. While they are in the house, I must give
+ them what time I can&mdash;and indeed, it is something to dread altogether.
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">Tuesday.
+</p>
+<p>
+ I send you the note I had begun before receiving yours of last night,
+ and also a fragment<a href="#note-18"><b>18</b></a> from Mrs. Hedley's herein enclosed, a full and
+ complete certificate, ... that you may know ... quite <i>know</i>, ... what
+ the real and only reason of the obstacle to Wednesday is. On Saturday
+ perhaps, or on Monday more certainly, there is likely to be no
+ opposition, ... at least not on the 'côté gauche' (<i>my</i> side!) to our
+ meeting&mdash;but I will let you know more.
+</p>
+<p>
+ For the rest, we have both been a little unlucky, there's no denying,
+ in overcoming the embarrassments of a first acquaintance&mdash;but suffer
+ me to say as one other last word, (and <i>quite, quite the last this
+ time</i>!) in case there should have been anything approaching, however
+ remotely, to a distrustful or unkind tone in what I wrote on Sunday,
+ (and I have a sort of consciousness that in the process of my
+ self-scorning I was not in the most sabbatical of moods perhaps&mdash;)
+ that I do recall and abjure it, and from my heart entreat your pardon
+ for it, and profess, notwithstanding it, neither to 'choose' nor 'to
+ be able' to think otherwise of you than I have done, ... as of one
+ <i>most</i> generous and <i>most</i> loyal; for that if I chose, I could not;
+ and that if I could, I should not choose.
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">Ever and gratefully your friend,</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">E.B.B.
+</p>
+<p>
+ &mdash;And now we shall hear of 'Luria,' shall we not? and much besides.
+ And Miss Mitford has sent me the most high comical of letters to
+ read, addressed to her by 'R.B. Haydon historical painter' which has
+ made me quite laugh; and would make <i>you</i>; expressing his righteous
+ indignation at the 'great fact' and gross impropriety of any man who
+ has 'thoughts too deep for tears' agreeing to wear a 'bag-wig' ... the
+ case of poor Wordsworth's going to court, you know.&mdash;Mr. Haydon being
+ infinitely serious all the time, and yet holding the doctrine of the
+ divine right of princes in his left hand.
+</p>
+<p>
+ How is your head? may I be hoping the best for it? May God bless you.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3>
+ <i>R.B. to E.B.B.</i>
+</h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">[Post-mark, May 28, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ Saturday, Monday, as you shall appoint&mdash;no need to say that, or my
+ thanks&mdash;but this note troubles you, out of my bounden duty to help
+ you, or Miss Mitford, to make the Painter run violently down a steep
+ place into the sea, if that will amuse you, by further informing him,
+ what I know on the best authority, that Wordsworth's 'bag-wig,' or at
+ least, the more important of his court-habiliments, were considerately
+ furnished for the nonce by <i>Mr. Rogers</i> from his own wardrobe, to the
+ manifest advantage of the Laureate's pocket, but more problematic
+ improvement of his person, when one thinks on the astounding
+ difference of 'build' in the two Poets:&mdash;the fact should be put on
+ record, if only as serving to render less chimerical a promise
+ sometimes figuring in the columns of provincial newspapers&mdash;that the
+ two apprentices, some grocer or other advertises for, will be 'boarded
+ and <i>clothed</i> like <i>one</i> of the family.' May not your unfinished
+ (really good) head of the great man have been happily kept waiting for
+ the body which can now be added on, with all this picturesqueness of
+ circumstances. Precept on precept ... but then, <i>line upon line</i>, is
+ allowed by as good authority, and may I not draw <i>my</i> confirming black
+ line after yours, yet not break pledge? I am most grateful to you for
+ doing me justice&mdash;doing yourself, your own judgment, justice, since
+ even the play-wright of Theseus and the Amazon found it one of his
+ hardest devices to 'write me a speech, lest the lady be frightened,
+ wherein it shall be said that I, Pyramus, am not Pyramus, but &amp;c. &amp;c.'
+ God bless you&mdash;one thing more, but one&mdash;you <i>could never have</i>
+ misunderstood the <i>asking for the letter again</i>, I feared you might
+ refer to it 'pour constater le fait'&mdash;
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">And now I am yours&mdash;</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">R.B.
+</p>
+<p>
+ My head is all but well now; thank you.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3>
+ <i>E.B.B. to R.B.</i>
+</h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Friday Morning.<br>
+[Post-mark, May 30, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ Just one word to say that if Saturday, to-morrow, should be
+ fine&mdash;because in the case of its raining I <i>shall not expect you</i>; you
+ will find me at three o'clock.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Yes&mdash;the circumstances of the costume were mentioned in the letter;
+ Mr. Rogers' bag-wig and the rest, and David Wilkie's sword&mdash;and also
+ that the Laureate, so equipped, fell down upon both knees in the
+ superfluity of etiquette, and had to be picked up by two
+ lords-in-waiting. It is a large exaggeration I do not doubt&mdash;and then
+ I never sympathised with the sighing kept up by people about that
+ acceptance of the Laureateship which drew the bag-wig as a corollary
+ after it. Not that the Laureateship honoured <i>him</i>, but that he
+ honoured it; and that, so honouring it, he preserves a symbol
+ instructive to the masses, who are children and to be taught by
+ symbols now as formerly. Isn't it true? or at least may it not be
+ true? And won't the court laurel (such as it is) be all the worthier
+ of <i>you</i> for Wordsworth's having worn it first?
+</p>
+<p>
+ And in the meantime I shall see you to-morrow perhaps? or if it should
+ rain, on Monday at the same hour.
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">Ever yours, my dear friend,</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">E.B.B.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3>
+ <i>E.B.B. to R.B.</i>
+</h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Friday Morning.<br>
+[Post-mark, June 7, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ When I see all you have done for me in this 'Prometheus,' I feel more
+ than half ashamed both of it and of me for using your time so, and
+ forced to say in my own defence (not to you but myself) that I never
+ thought of meaning to inflict such work on you who might be doing so
+ much better things in the meantime both for me and for
+ others&mdash;because, you see, it is not the mere reading of the MS., but
+ the 'comparing' of the text, and the melancholy comparisons between
+ the English and the Greek, ... quite enough to turn you from your
+ <span title="philanthrôpou tropou">&phi;&iota;&lambda;&alpha;&nu;&theta;&rho;&omega;&pi;&omicron;&upsilon; &tau;&rho;&omicron;&pi;&omicron;&upsilon;</span><b><a href="#note-19">19</a></b> that I brought upon you; and indeed I
+ did not mean so much, nor so soon! Yet as you have done it for me&mdash;for
+ me who expected a few jottings down with a pencil and a general
+ opinion; it is of course of the greatest value, besides the pleasure
+ and pride which come of it; and I must say of the translation, (before
+ putting it aside for the nonce), that the circumstance of your paying
+ it so much attention and seeing any good in it, is quite enough reward
+ for the writer and quite enough motive for self-gratulation, if it
+ were all torn to fragments at this moment&mdash;which is a foolish thing to
+ say because it is so obvious, and because you would know it if I said
+ it or not.
+</p>
+<p>
+ And while you were doing this for me, you thought it unkind of me not
+ to write to you; yes, and you think me at this moment the very
+ princess of apologies and excuses and depreciations and all the rest
+ of the small family of distrust&mdash;or of hypocrisy ... who knows? Well!
+ but you are wrong ... wrong ... to think so; and you will let me say
+ one word to show where you are wrong&mdash;not for you to controvert, ...
+ because it must relate to myself especially, and lies beyond your
+ cognizance, and is something which I <i>must know best</i> after all. And
+ it is, ... that you persist in putting me into a false position, with
+ respect to <i>fixing days</i> and the like, and in making me feel somewhat
+ as I did when I was a child, and Papa used to put me up on the
+ chimney-piece and exhort me to stand up straight like a hero, which I
+ did, straighter and straighter, and then suddenly 'was 'ware' (as we
+ say in the ballads) of the walls' growing alive behind me and
+ extending two stony hands to push me down that frightful precipice to
+ the rug, where the dog lay ... dear old Havannah, ... and where he and
+ I were likely to be dashed to pieces together and mix our uncanonised
+ bones. Now my present false position ... which is not the
+ chimney-piece's, ... is the necessity you provide for me in the shape
+ of my having to name this day, or that day, ... and of your coming
+ because I name it, and of my having to think and remember that you
+ come because I name it. Through a weakness, perhaps, or morbidness, or
+ one knows not how to define it, I <i>cannot help</i> being uncomfortable in
+ having to do this,&mdash;it is impossible. Not that I distrust <i>you</i>&mdash;you
+ are the last in the world I could distrust: and then (although you may
+ be sceptical) I am naturally given to trust ... to a fault ... as some
+ say, or to a sin, as some reproach me:&mdash;and then again, if I were ever
+ such a distruster, it could not be of <i>you</i>. But if you knew me&mdash;! I
+ will tell you! if one of my brothers omits coming to this room for two
+ days, ... I never ask why it happened! if my own father omits coming
+ up-stairs to say 'good night,' I never say a word; and not from
+ indifference. Do try to make out these readings of me as a <i>dixit
+ Casaubonus</i>; and don't throw me down as a corrupt text, nor convict me
+ for an infidel which I am not. On the contrary I am grateful and happy
+ to believe that you like to come here; and even if you came here as a
+ pure act of charity and pity to me, as long as you <i>chose to come</i> I
+ should not be too proud to be grateful and happy still. I could not be
+ proud to <i>you</i>, and I hope you will not fancy such a possibility,
+ which is the remotest of all. Yes, and <i>I</i> am anxious to ask you to be
+ wholly generous and leave off such an interpreting philosophy as you
+ made use of yesterday, and forgive me when I beg you to fix your own
+ days for coming for the future. Will you? It is the same thing in one
+ way. If you like to come really every week, there is no hindrance to
+ it&mdash;you can do it&mdash;and the privilege and obligation remain equally
+ mine:&mdash;and if you name a day for coming on any week, where there is an
+ obstacle on my side, you will learn it from me in a moment. Why I
+ might as well charge <i>you</i> with distrusting <i>me</i>, because you persist
+ in making me choose the days. And it is not for me to do it, but for
+ you&mdash;I must feel that&mdash;and I cannot help chafing myself against the
+ thought that for me to begin to fix days in this way, just because you
+ have quick impulses (like all imaginative persons), and wish me to do
+ it now, may bring me to the catastrophe of asking you to come when you
+ would rather not, ... which, as you say truly, would not be an
+ important vexation to you; but to me would be worse than vexation; to
+ <i>me</i>&mdash;and therefore I shrink from the very imagination of the
+ possibility of such a thing, and ask you to bear with me and let it be
+ as I prefer ... left to your own choice of the moment. And bear with
+ me above all&mdash;because this shows no want of faith in you ... none ...
+ but comes from a simple fact (with its ramifications) ... that you
+ know little of me personally yet, and that <i>you guess</i>, even, but very
+ little of the influence of a peculiar experience over me and out of
+ me; and if I wanted a proof of this, we need not seek further than the
+ very point of discussion, and the hard worldly thoughts you thought I
+ was thinking of you yesterday,&mdash;I, who thought not one of them! But I
+ am so used to discern the correcting and ministering angels by the
+ same footsteps on the ground, that it is not wonderful I should look
+ down there at any approach of a <span title="philia taxis">&phi;&iota;&lambda;&iota;&alpha; &tau;&alpha;&xi;&iota;&sigmaf;</span> whatever to this
+ personal <i>me</i>. Have I not been ground down to browns and blacks? and
+ is it my fault if I am not green? Not that it is my <i>complaint</i>&mdash;I
+ should not be justified in complaining; I believe, as I told you, that
+ there is more gladness than sadness in the world&mdash;that is, generally:
+ and if some natures have to be refined by the sun, and some by the
+ furnace (the less genial ones) both means are to be recognised as
+ <i>good</i>, ... however different in pleasurableness and painfulness, and
+ though furnace-fire leaves scorched streaks upon the fruit. I assured
+ you there was nothing I had any power of teaching you: and there <i>is</i>
+ nothing, except grief!&mdash;which I would not teach you, you know, if I
+ had the occasion granted.
+</p>
+<p>
+ It is a multitude of words about nothing at all, ... this&mdash;but I am
+ like Mariana in the moated grange and sit listening too often to the
+ mouse in the wainscot. Be as forbearing as you can&mdash;and believe how
+ profoundly it touches me that you should care to come here at all,
+ much more, so often! and try to understand that if I did not write as
+ you half asked, it was just because I failed at the moment to get up
+ enough pomp and circumstance to write on purpose to certify the
+ important fact of my being a little stronger or a little weaker on one
+ particular morning. That I am always ready and rejoiced to write to
+ you, you know perfectly well, and I have proved, by 'superfluity of
+ naughtiness' and prolixity through some twenty posts:&mdash;and this, and
+ therefore, you will agree altogether to attribute no more to me on
+ these counts, and determine to read me no more backwards with your
+ Hebrew, putting in your own vowel points without my leave! Shall it be
+ so?
+</p>
+<p>
+ Here is a letter grown from a note which it meant to be&mdash;and I have
+ been interrupted in the midst of it, or it should have gone to you
+ earlier. Let what I have said in it of myself pass unquestioned and
+ unnoticed, because it is of <i>me</i> and not of <i>you</i>, ... and, if in any
+ wise lunatical, all the talking and writing in the world will not put
+ the implied moon into another quarter. Only be patient with me a
+ little, ... and let us have a smooth ground for the poems which I am
+ foreseeing the sight of with such pride and delight&mdash;Such pride and
+ delight!
+</p>
+<p>
+ And one thing ... which is chief, though it seems to come last!... you
+ <i>will</i> have advice (will you not?) if that pain does not grow much
+ better directly? It cannot be prudent or even <i>safe</i> to let a pain in
+ the head go on so long, and no remedy be attempted for it, ... and you
+ cannot be sure that it is a merely nervous pain and that it may not
+ have consequences; and this, quite apart from the consideration of
+ suffering. So you will see some one with an opinion to give, and take
+ it? <i>Do</i>, I beseech you. You will not say 'no'? Also ... if on
+ Wednesday you should be less well than usual, you will come on
+ Thursday instead, I hope, ... seeing that it must be right for you to
+ be quiet and silent when you suffer so, and a journey into London can
+ let you be neither. Otherwise, I hold to my day, ... Wednesday. And
+ may God bless you my dear friend.
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">Ever yours,</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">E.B.B.
+</p>
+<p>
+ You are right I see, nearly everywhere, if not quite everywhere in the
+ criticisms&mdash;but of course I have not looked very closely&mdash;that is, I
+ have read your papers but not in connection with a <i>my</i> side of the
+ argument&mdash;but I shall lose the post after all.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3>
+ <i>R.B. to E.B.B.</i>
+</h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Saturday Morning.<br>
+[Post-mark, June 7, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ I ventured to hope this morning might bring me news of you&mdash;First
+ East-winds on you, then myself, then those criticisms!&mdash;I do assure
+ you I am properly apprehensive. How are you? May I go on Wednesday
+ without too much <span title="anthadia">&alpha;&nu;&theta;&alpha;&delta;&iota;&alpha;</span>.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Pray remember what I said and wrote, to the effect that my exceptions
+ were, in almost every case, to the 'reading'&mdash;not to your version of
+ it: but I have not specified the particular ones&mdash;not written down the
+ Greek, of my suggested translations&mdash;have I? And if you do not find
+ them in the margin of your copy, how you must wonder! Thus, in the
+ last speech but one, of Hermes, I prefer Porson and Blomfield's
+ <span title="ei mêd' atychôn ti chala maniôn">&epsilon;&iota; &mu;&eta;&delta;' &alpha;&tau;&upsilon;&chi;&omega;&nu; &tau;&iota; &chi;&alpha;&lambda;&alpha; &mu;&alpha;&nu;&iota;&omega;&nu;</span>;&mdash;to the old combinations
+ that include <span title="eutychê">&epsilon;&upsilon;&tau;&upsilon;&chi;&eta;</span>&mdash;though there is no MS. authority for
+ emendation, it seems. But in what respect does Prometheus 'fare
+ <i>well</i>,' or 'better' even, since the beginning? And is it not the old
+ argument over again, that when a man <i>fails</i> he should repent of his
+ ways?&mdash;And while thinking of Hermes, let me say that '<span title="mêde moi diplas odous prosbalês">&mu;&eta;&delta;&epsilon; &mu;&omicron;&iota; &delta;&iota;&pi;&lambda;&alpha;&sigmaf; &omicron;&delta;&omicron;&upsilon;&sigmaf; &pi;&rho;&omicron;&sigma;&beta;&alpha;&lambda;&eta;&sigmaf;</span>' is surely&mdash;'Don't subject me to the trouble
+ of a second journey ... by paying no attention to the first.' So says
+ Scholiast A, and so backs him Scholiast B, especially created, it
+ should appear, to show there could be <i>in rerum naturâ</i> such another
+ as his predecessor. A few other remarks occur to me, which I will tell
+ you if you please; <i>now</i>, I really want to know how you are, and write
+ for that.
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">Ever yours,</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">R.B.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3>
+ <i>R.B. to E.B.B.</i>
+</h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">[Post-mark, June 9, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ Just after my note left, yours came&mdash;I will try so to answer it as to
+ please you; and I begin by promising cheerfully to do all you bid me
+ about naming days &amp;c. I do believe we are friends now and for ever.
+ There can be no reason, therefore, that I should cling tenaciously to
+ any one or other time of meeting, as if, losing that, I lost
+ everything&mdash;and, for the future, I will provide against sudden
+ engagements, outrageous weather &amp;c., to your heart's content. Nor am I
+ going to except against here and there a little wrong I could get up,
+ as when you <i>imply</i> from my quick impulses and the like. No, my dear
+ friend&mdash;for I seem sure I shall have quite, quite time enough to do
+ myself justice in your eyes&mdash;Let time show!
+</p>
+<p>
+ Perhaps I feel none the less sorely, when you 'thank' me for such
+ company as mine, that I cannot avoid confessing to myself that it
+ would not be so absolutely out of my power, perhaps, to contrive
+ really and deserve thanks in a certain acceptation&mdash;I <i>might</i> really
+ <i>try</i>, at all events, and amuse you a little better, when I do have
+ the opportunity,&mdash;and I <i>do not</i>&mdash;but there is the thing! It is all of
+ a piece&mdash;I <i>do not</i> seek your friendship in order to do you good&mdash;any
+ good&mdash;only to do myself good. Though I <i>would</i>, God knows, do that
+ too.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Enough of this.
+</p>
+<p>
+ I am much better, indeed,&mdash;but will certainly follow your advice
+ should the pain return. And you&mdash;you have tried a new journey from
+ your room, have you not?
+</p>
+<p>
+ Do recollect, at any turn, any chance so far in my favour,&mdash;that I am
+ here and yours should you want any fetching and carrying in this
+ outside London world. Your brothers may have their own business to
+ mind, Mr. Kenyon is at New York, we will suppose; here am I&mdash;what
+ else, <i>what else</i> makes me count my cleverness to you, as I know I
+ have done more than once, by word and letter, but the real wish to be
+ set at work? I should have, I hope, better taste than to tell any
+ everyday acquaintance, who could not go out, one single morning even,
+ on account of a headache, that the weather was delightful, much less
+ that I had been walking five miles and meant to run ten&mdash;yet to you I
+ boasted once of polking and waltzing and more&mdash;but then would it not
+ be a very superfluous piece of respect in the four-footed bird to keep
+ his wings to himself because his Master Oceanos could fly forsooth?
+ Whereas he begins to wave a flap and show how ready they are to be
+ off&mdash;for what else were the good of him? Think of this&mdash;and
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">Know me for yours</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">R.B.
+</p>
+<p>
+ For good you are, to those notes&mdash;you shall have more,&mdash;that is, the
+ rest&mdash;on Wednesday then, at 3, except as you except. God bless you.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Oh, let me tell you&mdash;I suppose Mr. Horne must be in town&mdash;as I
+ received a letter two days ago, from the contriver of some literary
+ society or other who had before written to get me to belong to it,
+ protesting <i>against</i> my reasons for refusing, and begging that 'at all
+ events I would suspend my determination till I had been visited by Mr.
+ H. on the subject'&mdash;and, as they can hardly mean to bring him express
+ from the Drachenfels for just that, he is returned no doubt&mdash;and as he
+ is your friend, I take the opportunity of mentioning the course I
+ shall pursue with him or any other friend of yours I may meet,&mdash;(and
+ everybody else, I may add&mdash;) the course I understand you to desire,
+ with respect to our own intimacy. While I may acknowledge, I believe,
+ that I correspond with you, I shall not, in any case, suffer it to be
+ known that I see, or have seen you. This I just remind you of, lest
+ any occasion of embarrassment should arise, for a moment, from your
+ not being quite sure how <i>I</i> had acted in any case.&mdash;Con che, le bacio
+ le mani&mdash;a rivederla!
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3>
+ <i>E.B.B. to R.B.</i>
+</h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Tuesday Morning.<br>
+[Post-mark, June 10, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ I must thank you by one word for all your kindness and
+ consideration&mdash;which could not be greater; nor more felt by me. In the
+ first place, afterwards (if that should not be Irish dialect) do
+ understand that my letter passed from my hands to go to yours on
+ <i>Friday</i>, but was thrown aside carelessly down stairs and 'covered up'
+ they say, so as not to be seen until late on Saturday; and I can only
+ humbly hope to have been cross enough about it (having conscientiously
+ tried) to secure a little more accuracy another time.&mdash;And then, ...
+ if ever I should want anything done or found, ... (a roc's egg or the
+ like) you may believe me that I shall not scruple to ask you to be the
+ finder; but at this moment I want nothing, indeed, except your poems;
+ and that is quite the truth. Now do consider and think what I could
+ possibly want in your 'outside London world'; you, who are the 'Genius
+ of the lamp'!&mdash;Why if you light it and let me read your romances, &amp;c.,
+ by it, is not that the best use for it, and am I likely to look for
+ another? Only I shall remember what you say, gratefully and seriously;
+ and if ever I should have a good fair opportunity of giving you
+ trouble (as if I had not done it already!), you may rely upon my evil
+ intentions; even though dear Mr. Kenyon should not actually be at New
+ York, ... which he is not, I am glad to say, as I saw him on Saturday.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Which reminds me that <i>he</i> knows of your having been here, of course!
+ and will not mention it; as he understood from me that <i>you</i> would
+ not.&mdash;Thank you! Also there was an especial reason which constrained
+ me, on pain of appearing a great hypocrite, to tell Miss Mitford the
+ bare fact of my having seen you&mdash;and reluctantly I did it, though
+ placing some hope in her promise of discretion. And how necessary the
+ discretion is, will appear in the awful statistical fact of our having
+ at this moment, as my sisters were calculating yesterday, some forty
+ relations in London&mdash;to say nothing of the right wing of the enemy.
+ For Mr. Horne, I could have told you, and really I thought I <i>had</i>
+ told you of his being in England.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Last paragraph of all is, that I <i>don't want to be amused</i>, ... or
+ rather that I <i>am</i> amused by everything and anything. Why surely,
+ surely, you have some singular ideas about me! So, till to-morrow,
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">E.B.B.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Instead of writing this note to you yesterday, as should have been, I
+ went down-stairs&mdash;or rather was carried&mdash;and am not the worse.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3>
+ <i>E.B.B. to R.B.</i>
+</h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Friday.<br>
+[Post-mark, June 14, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ Yes, the poem <i>is</i> too good in certain respects for the prizes given
+ in colleges, (when all the pure parsley goes naturally to the
+ rabbits), and has a great deal of beauty here and there in image and
+ expression. Still I do not quite agree with you that it reaches the
+ Tennyson standard any wise; and for the blank verse, I cannot for a
+ moment think it comparable to one of the grand passages in 'Oenone,'
+ and 'Arthur' and the like. In fact I seem to hear more in that latter
+ blank verse than you do, ... to hear not only a 'mighty line' as in
+ Marlowe, but a noble full orbicular wholeness in complete
+ passages&mdash;which always struck me as the mystery of music and great
+ peculiarity in Tennyson's versification, inasmuch as he attains to
+ these complete effects without that shifting of the pause practised by
+ the masters, ... Shelley and others. A 'linked music' in which there
+ are no links!&mdash;<i>that</i>, you would take to be a contradiction&mdash;and yet
+ something like that, my ear has always seemed to perceive; and I have
+ wondered curiously again and again how there could be so much union
+ and no fastening. Only of course it is not model versification&mdash;and
+ for dramatic purposes, it must be admitted to be bad.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Which reminds me to be astonished for the second time how you could
+ think such a thing of me as that I wanted to read only your lyrics,
+ ... or that I 'preferred the lyrics' ... or something barbarous in
+ that way? You don't think me 'ambidexter,' or 'either-handed' ... and
+ both hands open for what poems you will vouchsafe to me; and yet if
+ you would let me see anything you may have in a readable state by you,
+ ... 'The Flight of the Duchess' ... or act or scene of 'The Soul's
+ Tragedy,' ... I shall be so glad and grateful to you! Oh&mdash;if you
+ change your mind and choose to be <i>bien prié</i>, I will grant it is your
+ right, and begin my liturgy directly. But this is not teazing (in the
+ intention of it!) and I understand all about the transcription, and
+ the inscrutableness of rough copies,&mdash;that is, if you write as I do,
+ so that my guardian angel or M. Champollion cannot read what is
+ written. Only whatever they can, (remember!) <i>I</i> can: and you are not
+ to mind trusting me with the cacistography possible to mortal readers.
+</p>
+<p>
+ The sun shines so that nobody dares complain of the east wind&mdash;and
+ indeed I am better altogether. May God bless you, my dear friend.
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">E.B.B.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3>
+ <i>R.B. to E.B.B.</i>
+</h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">[Post-mark, June 14, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ When I ask my wise self what I really do remember of the Prize poem,
+ the answer is&mdash;both of Chapman's lines a-top, quite worth any prize
+ for their quoter&mdash;then, the good epithet of 'Green Europe' contrasting
+ with Africa&mdash;then, deep in the piece, a picture of a Vestal in a
+ vault, where I see a dipping and winking lamp plainest, and last of
+ all the ominous 'all was dark' that dismisses you. I read the poem
+ many years ago, and never since, though I have an impression that the
+ versification is good, yet from your commentary I see I must have said
+ a good deal more in its praise than that. But have you not discovered
+ by this time that I go on talking with my thoughts away?
+</p>
+<p>
+ I know, I have always been jealous of my own musical faculty (I can
+ write music).&mdash;Now that I see the uselessness of such jealousy, and am
+ for loosing and letting it go, it may be cramped possibly. Your music
+ is more various and exquisite than any modern writer's to my ear. One
+ should study the mechanical part of the art, as nearly all that there
+ is to be studied&mdash;for the more one sits and thinks over the creative
+ process, the more it confirms itself as 'inspiration,' nothing more
+ nor less. Or, at worst, you write down old inspirations, what you
+ remember of them ... but with <i>that</i> it begins. 'Reflection' is
+ exactly what it names itself&mdash;a <i>re</i>-presentation, in scattered rays
+ from every angle of incidence, of what first of all became present in
+ a great light, a whole one. So tell me how these lights are born, if
+ you can! But I can tell anybody how to make melodious verses&mdash;let him
+ do it therefore&mdash;it should be exacted of all writers.
+</p>
+<p>
+ You do not understand what a new feeling it is for me to have someone
+ who is to like my verses or I shall not ever like them after! So far
+ differently was I circumstanced of old, that I used rather to go about
+ for a subject of offence to people; writing ugly things in order to
+ warn the ungenial and timorous off my grounds at once. I shall never
+ do so again at least! As it is, I will bring all I dare, in as great
+ quantities as I can&mdash;if not next time, after then&mdash;certainly. I must
+ make an end, print this Autumn my last four 'Bells,' Lyrics, Romances,
+ 'The Tragedy,' and 'Luna,' and then go on with a whole heart to my own
+ Poem&mdash;indeed, I have just resolved not to begin any new song, even,
+ till this grand clearance is made&mdash;I will get the Tragedy transcribed
+ to bring&mdash;
+</p>
+<p>
+ 'To bring!' Next Wednesday&mdash;if you know how happy you make me! may I
+ not say <i>that</i>, my dear friend, when I feel it from my soul?
+</p>
+<p>
+ I thank God that you are better: do pray make fresh endeavours to
+ profit by this partial respite of the weather! All about you must urge
+ that: but even from my distance some effect might come of such wishes.
+ But you <i>are</i> better&mdash;look so and speak so! God bless you.
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">R.B.
+</p>
+<p>
+ You let 'flowers be sent you in a letter,' every one knows, and this
+ hot day draws out our very first yellow rose.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3>
+ <i>E.B.B. to R.B.</i>
+</h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Monday.<br>
+[Post-mark, June 17, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ Yes, I quite believe as you do that what is called the 'creative
+ process' in works of Art, is just inspiration and no less&mdash;which made
+ somebody say to me not long since; And so you think that Shakespeare's
+ 'Othello' was of the effluence of the Holy Ghost?'&mdash;rather a startling
+ deduction, ... only not quite as final as might appear to somebodies
+ perhaps. At least it does not prevent my going on to agree with the
+ saying of <i>Spiridion</i>, ... do you remember?... 'Tout ce que l'homme
+ appelle inspiration, je l'appelle aussi revelation,' ... if there is
+ not something too self-evident in it after all&mdash;my sole objection! And
+ is it not true that your inability to analyse the mental process in
+ question, is one of the proofs of the fact of inspiration?&mdash;as the
+ gods were known of old by not being seen to move their feet,&mdash;coming
+ and going in an equal sweep of radiance.&mdash;And still more wonderful
+ than the first transient great light you speak of, ... and far beyond
+ any work of <i>re</i>flection, except in the pure analytical sense in which
+ you use the word, ... appears that gathering of light on light upon
+ particular points, as you go (in composition) step by step, till you
+ get intimately near to things, and see them in a fullness and
+ clearness, and an intense trust in the truth of them which you have
+ not in any sunshine of noon (called <i>real</i>!) but which you have <i>then</i>
+ ... and struggle to communicate:&mdash;an ineffectual struggle with most
+ writers (oh, how ineffectual!) and when effectual, issuing in the
+ 'Pippa Passes,' and other master-pieces of the world.
+</p>
+<p>
+ You will tell me what you mean exactly by being jealous of your own
+ music? You said once that you had had a false notion of music, or had
+ practised it according to the false notions of other people: but did
+ you mean besides that you ever had meant to despise music
+ altogether&mdash;because <i>that</i>, it is hard to set about trying to believe
+ of you indeed. And then, you <i>can</i> praise my verses for music?&mdash;Why,
+ are you aware that people blame me constantly for wanting
+ harmony&mdash;from Mr. Boyd who moans aloud over the indisposition of my
+ 'trochees' ... and no less a person than Mr. Tennyson, who said to
+ somebody who repeated it, that in the want of harmony lay the chief
+ defect of the poems, 'although it might verily be retrieved, as he
+ could fancy that I had an ear by nature.' Well&mdash;but I am pleased that
+ you should praise me&mdash;right or wrong&mdash;I mean, whether I am right or
+ wrong in being pleased! and I say so to you openly, although my belief
+ is that you are under a vow to our Lady of Loretto to make giddy with
+ all manner of high vanities, some head, ... not too strong for such
+ things, but too low for them, ... before you see again the embroidery
+ on her divine petticoat. Only there's a flattery so far beyond praise
+ ... even <i>your</i> praise&mdash;as where you talk of your verses being liked
+ &amp;c., and of your being happy to bring them here, ... that is scarcely
+ a lawful weapon; and see if the Madonna may not signify so much to
+ you!&mdash;Seriously, you will not hurry too uncomfortably, or
+ uncomfortably at all, about the transcribing? Another day, you know,
+ will do as well&mdash;and patience is possible to me, if not 'native to the
+ soil.'
+</p>
+<p>
+ Also I am behaving very well in going out into the noise; not quite
+ out of doors yet, on account of the heat&mdash;and I am better as you say,
+ without any doubt at all, and stronger&mdash;only my looks are a little
+ deceitful; and people are apt to be heated and flushed in this
+ weather, one hour, to look a little more ghastly an hour or two after.
+ Not that it <i>is</i> not true of me that I am better, mind! Because I am.
+</p>
+<p>
+ The 'flower in the letter' was from one of my sisters&mdash;from Arabel
+ (though many of these poems are <i>ideal</i> ... will you understand?) and
+ your rose came quite alive and fresh, though in act of dropping its
+ beautiful leaves, because of having to come to me instead of living on
+ in your garden, as it intended. But I thank you&mdash;for this, and all, my
+ dear friend.
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">E.B.B.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3>
+ <i>R.B. to E.B.B.</i>
+</h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Thursday Morning.<br>
+[Post-mark, June 19, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ When I next see you, do not let me go on and on to my confusion about
+ matters I am more or less ignorant of, but always ignorant. I tell
+ you plainly I only trench on them, and intrench in them, from
+ gaucherie, pure and respectable ... I should certainly grow
+ instructive on the prospects of hay-crops and pasture-land, if
+ deprived of this resource. And now here is a week to wait before I
+ shall have any occasion to relapse into Greek literature when I am
+ thinking all the while, 'now I will just ask simply, what flattery
+ there was,' &amp;c. &amp;c., which, as I had not courage to say then, I keep
+ to myself for shame now. This I will say, then&mdash;wait and know me
+ better, as you will one long day at the end.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Why I write now, is because you did not promise, as before, to let me
+ know how you are&mdash;this morning is miserably cold again&mdash;Will you tell
+ me, at your own time?
+</p>
+<p>
+ God bless you, my dear friend.
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">R.B.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3>
+ <i>E.B.B. to R.B.</i>
+</h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Thursday Evening.<br>
+[Post-mark, June 20, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ If on Greek literature or anything else it is your pleasure to
+ cultivate a reputation for ignorance, I will respect your desire&mdash;and
+ indeed the point of the deficiency in question being far above my
+ sight I am not qualified either to deny or assert the existence of it;
+ so you are free to have it all your own way.
+</p>
+<p>
+ About the 'flattery' however, there is a difference; and I must deny a
+ little having ever used such a word ... as far as I can recollect, and
+ I have been trying to recollect, ... as that word of flattery. Perhaps
+ I said something about your having vowed to make me vain by writing
+ this or that of my liking your verses and so on&mdash;and perhaps I said it
+ too lightly ... which happened because when one doesn't know whether
+ to laugh or to cry, it is far best, as a general rule, to laugh. But
+ the serious truth is that it was all nonsense together what I wrote,
+ and that, instead of talking of your making me vain, I should have
+ talked (if it had been done sincerely) of your humbling me&mdash;inasmuch
+ as nothing does humble anybody so much as being lifted up too high.
+ You know what vaulting Ambition did once for himself? and when it is
+ done for him by another, his fall is still heavier. And one moral of
+ all this general philosophy is, that if when your poems come, you
+ persist in giving too much importance to what I may have courage to
+ say of this or of that in them, you will make me a dumb critic and I
+ shall have no help for my dumbness. So I tell you beforehand&mdash;nothing
+ extenuating nor exaggerating nor putting down in malice. I know so
+ much of myself as to be sure of it. Even as it is, the 'insolence'
+ which people blame me for and praise me for, ... the 'recklessness'
+ which my friends talk of with mitigating countenances ... seems
+ gradually going and going&mdash;and really it would not be very strange
+ (without that) if <i>I</i> who was born a hero worshipper and have so
+ continued, and who always recognised your genius, should find it
+ impossible to bring out critical doxies on the workings of it. Well&mdash;I
+ shall do what I can&mdash;as far as <i>impressions</i> go, you understand&mdash;and
+ <i>you</i> must promise not to attach too much importance to anything said.
+ So that is a covenant, my dear friend!&mdash;
+</p>
+<p>
+ And I am really gaining strength&mdash;and I will not complain of the
+ weather. As long as the thermometer keeps above sixty I am content for
+ one; and the roses are not quite dead yet, which they would have been
+ in the heat. And last and not least&mdash;may I ask if you were told that
+ the pain in the head was not important (or was) in the causes, ... and
+ was likely to be well soon? or was not? I am at the end.
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">E.B.B.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Upon second or third thoughts, isn't it true that you are a little
+ suspicious of me? suspicious at least of suspiciousness?
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3>
+ <i>R.B. to E.B.B.</i>
+</h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Sunday Afternoon.<br>
+[Post-mark, June 23, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ And if I am 'suspicious of your suspiciousness,' who gives cause,
+ pray? The matter was long ago settled, I thought, when you first took
+ exception to what I said about higher and lower, and I consented to
+ this much&mdash;that you should help seeing, if you could, our true
+ intellectual and moral relation each to the other, so long as you
+ would allow <i>me</i> to see what <i>is</i> there, fronting me. 'Is my eye evil
+ because yours is not good?' My own friend, if I wished to 'make you
+ vain,' if having 'found the Bower' I did really address myself to the
+ wise business of spoiling its rose-roof,&mdash;I think that at least where
+ there was such a will, there would be also something not unlike a
+ way,&mdash;that I should find a proper hooked stick to tear down flowers
+ with, and write you other letters than these&mdash;quite, quite others, I
+ feel&mdash;though I am far from going to imagine, even for a moment, what
+ might be the precise prodigy&mdash;like the notable Son of Zeus, that <i>was</i>
+ to have been, and done the wonders, only he did not, because &amp;c. &amp;c.
+</p>
+<p>
+ But I have a restless head to-day, and so let you off easily. Well,
+ you ask me about it, that head, and I am not justified in being
+ positive when my Doctor is dubious; as for the causes, they are
+ neither superfluity of study, nor fancy, nor care, nor any special
+ naughtiness that I know how to amend. So if I bring you 'nothing to
+ signify' on Wednesday ... though I hope to do more than that ... you
+ will know exactly why it happens. I will finish and transcribe the
+ 'Flight of the Duchess' since you spoke of that first.
+</p>
+<p>
+ I am truly happy to hear that your health improves still.
+</p>
+<p>
+ For me, going out does me good&mdash;reading, writing, and, what is
+ odd,&mdash;infinitely most of all, <i>sleeping</i> do me the harm,&mdash;never any
+ very great harm. And all the while I am yours
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">R.B.
+</p>
+<h3>
+ <i>E.B.B. to R.B.</i>
+</h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Monday.<br>
+[Post-mark, June 24, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ I had begun to be afraid that I did not deserve to have my questions
+ answered; and I was afraid of asking them over again. But it is worse
+ to be afraid that you are not better at all in any essential manner
+ (after all your assurances) and that the medical means have failed so
+ far. Did you go to somebody who knows anything?&mdash;because there is no
+ excuse, you see, in common sense, for not having the best and most
+ experienced opinion when there is a choice of advice&mdash;and I am
+ confident that that pain should not be suffered to go on without
+ something being done. What I said about <i>nerves</i>, related to what you
+ had told me of your mother's suffering and what you had fancied of the
+ relation of it to your own, and not that I could be thinking about
+ imaginary complaints&mdash;I wish I could. Not (either) that I believe in
+ the relation ... because such things are not hereditary, are they? and
+ the bare coincidence is improbable. Well, but, I wanted particularly
+ to say this&mdash;<i>Don't bring the 'Duchess' with you on Wednesday.</i> I
+ shall not expect anything, I write distinctly to tell you&mdash;and I would
+ far far rather that you did not bring it. You see it is just as I
+ thought&mdash;for that whether too much thought or study did or did not
+ bring on the illness, ... yet you admit that reading and writing
+ increase it ... as they would naturally do any sort of pain in the
+ head&mdash;therefore if you will but be in earnest and try to get well
+ <i>first</i>, we will do the 'Bells' afterwards, and there will be time for
+ a whole peal of them, I hope and trust, before the winter. Now do
+ admit that this is reasonable, and agree reasonably to it. And if it
+ does you good to go out and take exercise, why not go out and take it?
+ nay, why not go <i>away</i> and take it? Why not try the effect of a little
+ change of air&mdash;or even of a great change of air&mdash;if it should be
+ necessary, or even expedient? Anything is better, you know ... or if
+ you don't know, <i>I</i> know&mdash;than to be ill, really, seriously&mdash;I mean
+ for <i>you</i> to be ill, who have so much to do and to enjoy in the world
+ yet ... and all those bells waiting to be hung! So that if you will
+ agree to be well first, I will promise to be ready afterwards to help
+ you in any thing I can do ... transcribing or anything ... to get the
+ books through the press in the shortest of times&mdash;and I am capable of
+ a great deal of that sort of work without being tired, having the
+ habit of writing in any sort of position, and the long habit, ...
+ since, before I was ill even, I never used to write at a table (or
+ scarcely ever) but on the arm of a chair, or on the seat of one,
+ sitting myself on the floor, and calling myself a Lollard for dignity.
+ So you will put by your 'Duchess' ... will you not? or let me see just
+ that one sheet&mdash;if one should be written&mdash;which is finished? ... up to
+ this moment, you understand? finished <i>now</i>.
+</p>
+<p>
+ And if I have tired and teazed you with all these words it is a bad
+ opportunity to take&mdash;and yet I will persist in saying through good and
+ bad opportunities that I never did 'give cause' as you say, to your
+ being 'suspicious of my suspiciousness' as I believe I said before. I
+ deny my 'suspiciousness' altogether&mdash;it is not one of my faults. Nor
+ is it quite my fault that you and I should always be quarrelling about
+ over-appreciations and under-appreciations&mdash;and after all I have no
+ interest nor wish, I do assure you, to depreciate myself&mdash;and you are
+ not to think that I have the remotest claim to the Monthyon prize for
+ good deeds in the way of modesty of self-estimation. Only when I know
+ you better, as you talk of ... and when <i>you</i> know <i>me</i> too well, ...
+ the right and the wrong of these conclusions will appear in a fuller
+ light than ever so much arguing can produce now. Is it unkindly
+ written of me? <i>no</i>&mdash;I <i>feel</i> it is not!&mdash;and that 'now and ever we
+ are friends,' (just as you think) <i>I</i> think besides and am happy in
+ thinking so, and could not be distrustful of you if I tried. So may
+ God bless you, my ever dear friend&mdash;and mind to forget the 'Duchess'
+ and to remember every good counsel!&mdash;Not that I do particularly
+ confide in the medical oracles. They never did much more for <i>me</i>
+ than, when my pulse was above a hundred and forty with fever, to give
+ me digitalis to make me weak&mdash;and, when I could not move without
+ fainting (with weakness), to give me quinine to make me feverish
+ again. Yes&mdash;and they could tell from the stethoscope, how very little
+ was really wrong in me ... if it were not on a vital organ&mdash;and how I
+ should certainly live ... if I didn't die sooner. But then, nothing
+ <i>has</i> power over affections of the chest, except God and his
+ winds&mdash;and I do hope that an obvious quick remedy may be found for
+ your head. But <i>do</i> give up the writing and all that does harm!&mdash;
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">Ever yours, my dear friend,</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">E.B.B.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Miss Mitford talked of spending Wednesday with me&mdash;and I have put it
+ off to Thursday:&mdash;and if you should hear from Mr. Chorley that he is
+ coming to see <i>her and me together on any day</i>, do understand that it
+ was entirely her proposition and not mine, and that certainly it won't
+ be acceded to, as far as <i>I</i> am concerned; as I have explained to her
+ finally. I have been vexed about it&mdash;but she can see him down-stairs
+ as she has done before&mdash;and if she calls me perverse and capricious
+ (which she will do) I shall stop the reflection by thanking her again
+ and again (as I can do sincerely) for her kindness and goodness in
+ coming to see me herself, so far!&mdash;
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3>
+ <i>R.B. to E.B.B.</i>
+</h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Tuesday Morning,<br>
+[Post-mark, June 24, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ (So my friend did not in the spirit see me write that <i>first</i> letter,
+ on Friday, which was too good and true to send, and met, five minutes
+ after, its natural fate accordingly. Then on Saturday I thought to
+ take health by storm, and walked myself half dead all the
+ morning&mdash;about town too: last post-hour from this Thule of a
+ suburb&mdash;4 P.M. on Saturdays, next expedition of letters, 8 A.M. on
+ Mondays;&mdash;and then my real letter set out with the others&mdash;and, it
+ should seem, set at rest a 'wonder whether thy friend's questions
+ deserved answering'&mdash;de-served&mdash;answer-ing&mdash;!)
+</p>
+<p>
+ Parenthetically so much&mdash;I want most, though, to tell you&mdash;(leaving
+ out any slightest attempt at thanking you) that I am much better,
+ quite well to-day&mdash;that my doctor has piloted me safely through two or
+ three illnesses, and knows all about me, I do think&mdash;and that he talks
+ confidently of getting rid of all the symptoms complained of&mdash;and
+ <i>has</i> made a good beginning if I may judge by to-day. As for going
+ abroad, that is just the thing I most want to avoid (for a reason not
+ so hard to guess, perhaps, as why my letter was slow in arriving).
+</p>
+<p>
+ So, till to-morrow,&mdash;my light through the dark week.
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">God ever bless you, dear friend,</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">R.B.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3>
+ <i>E.B.B. to R.B.</i>
+</h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Tuesday Evening.<br>
+[Post-mark, June 25, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ What will you think when I write to ask you <i>not</i> to come to-morrow,
+ Wednesday; but ... on Friday perhaps, instead? But do see how it is;
+ and judge if it is to be helped.
+</p>
+<p>
+ I have waited hour after hour, hoping to hear from Miss Mitford that
+ she would agree to take Thursday in change for Wednesday,&mdash;and just as
+ I begin to wonder whether she can have received my letter at all, or
+ whether she may not have been vexed by it into taking a vengeance and
+ adhering to her own devices; (for it appealed to her esprit de sexe on
+ the undeniable axiom of women having their way ... and she might
+ choose to act it out!) just as I wonder over all this, and consider
+ what a confusion of the elements it would be if you came and found her
+ here, and Mr. Chorley at the door perhaps, waiting for some of the
+ light of her countenance;&mdash;comes a note from Mr. Kenyon, to the
+ effect that <i>he</i> will be here at four o'clock P.M.&mdash;and comes a final
+ note from my aunt Mrs. Hedley (supposed to be at Brighton for several
+ months) to the effect that <i>she</i> will be here at twelve o'clock, M.!!
+ So do observe the constellation of adverse stars ... or the covey of
+ 'bad birds,' as the Romans called them, and that there is no choice,
+ but to write as I am writing. It can't be helped&mdash;can it? For take
+ away the doubt about Miss Mitford, and Mr. Kenyon remains&mdash;and take
+ away Mr. Kenyon, and there is Mrs. Hedley&mdash;and thus it <i>must be for
+ Friday</i> ... which will learn to be a fortunate day for the
+ nonce&mdash;unless Saturday should suit you better. I do not speak of
+ Thursday, because of the doubt about Miss Mitford&mdash;and if any harm
+ should happen to Friday, I will write again; but if you do not hear
+ again, and are able to come then, you <i>will</i> come perhaps then.
+</p>
+<p>
+ In the meantime I thank you for the better news in your note&mdash;if it is
+ really, really to be trusted in&mdash;but you know, you have said so often
+ that you were better and better, without being really better, that it
+ makes people ... 'suspicious.' Yet it is full amends for the
+ disappointment to hope ... here I must break off or be too late. May
+ God bless you my dear friend.
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">E.B.B.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3>
+ <i>R.B. to E.B.B.</i>
+</h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">12. Wednesday.<br>
+[Post-mark, June 25, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ Pomegranates you may cut deep down the middle and see into, but not
+ hearts,&mdash;so why should I try and speak?
+</p>
+<p>
+ Friday is best day because nearest, but Saturday is next best&mdash;it is
+ next near, you know: if I get no note, therefore, Friday is my day.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Now is Post-time,&mdash;which happens properly.
+</p>
+<p>
+ God bless you, and so your own
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">R.B.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3>
+ <i>E.B.B. to R.B.</i>
+</h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Thursday Evening.<br>
+[Post-mark, June 27, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ After all it must be for Saturday, as Mrs. Hedley comes again on
+ Friday, to-morrow, from <i>New Cross</i>,&mdash;or just beyond it, Eltham
+ Park&mdash;to London for a few days, on account of the illness of one of
+ her children. I write in the greatest haste after Miss Mitford has
+ left me ... and <i>so</i> tired! to say this, that if you can and will come
+ on Saturday, ... or if not on Monday or Tuesday, there is no reason
+ against it.
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">Your friend always,</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">E.B.B.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3>
+ <i>R.B. to E.B.B.</i>
+</h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Friday Morning.<br>
+[Post-mark, June 27, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ Let me make haste and write down <i>To-morrow</i>, Saturday, and not later,
+ lest my selfishness be thoroughly got under in its struggle with a
+ better feeling that tells me you must be far too tired for another
+ visitor this week.
+</p>
+<p>
+ What shall I decide on?
+</p>
+<p>
+ Well&mdash;Saturday is said&mdash;but I will stay not quite so long, nor talk
+ nearly so loud as of old-times; nor will you, if you understand
+ anything of me, fail to send down word should you be at all
+ indisposed. I should not have the heart to knock at the door unless I
+ really believed you would do that. Still saying this and providing
+ against the other does not amount, I well know, to the generosity, or
+ justice rather, of staying away for a day or two altogether. But&mdash;what
+ 'a day or two' may not bring forth! Change to you, change to me&mdash;
+</p>
+<p>
+ Not all of me, however, can change, thank God&mdash;
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">Yours ever</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">R.B.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Or, write, as last night, if needs be: Monday, Tuesday is not so long
+ to wait. Will you write?
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3>
+ <i>E.B.B. to R.B.</i>
+</h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Friday Evening.<br>
+[Post-mark, June 28, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ You are very kind and always&mdash;but really <i>that</i> does not seem a good
+ reason against your coming to-morrow&mdash;so come, if it should not rain.
+ If it rains, it <i>concludes</i> for Monday ... or Tuesday; whichever may
+ be clear of rain. I was tired on Wednesday by the confounding
+ confusion of more voices than usual in this room; but the effect
+ passed off, and though Miss Mitford was with me for hours yesterday I
+ am not unwell to-day. And pray speak <i>bona verba</i> about the awful
+ things which are possible between this now and Wednesday. You continue
+ to be better, I do hope? I am forced to the brevity you see, by the
+ post on one side, and my friends on the other, who have so long
+ overstayed the coming of your note&mdash;but it is enough to assure you
+ that you will do no harm by coming&mdash;only give pleasure.
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">Ever yours, my dear friend,</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">E.B.B.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3>
+ <i>E.B.B. to R.B.</i>
+</h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Monday.<br>
+[June 30, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ I send back the prize poems which have been kept far too long even if
+ I do not make excuses for the keeping&mdash;but our sins are not always to
+ be measured by our repentance for them. Then I am well enough this
+ morning to have thought of going out till they told me it was not at
+ all a right day for it ... too windy ... soft and delightful as the
+ air seems to be&mdash;particularly after yesterday, when we had some winter
+ back again in an episode. And the roses do not die; which is quite
+ magnanimous of them considering their reverses; and their buds are
+ coming out in most exemplary resignation&mdash;like birds singing in a
+ cage. Now that the windows may be open, the flowers take heart to live
+ a little in this room.
+</p>
+<p>
+ And think of my forgetting to tell you on Saturday that I had known of
+ a letter being received by somebody from Miss Martineau, who is at
+ Ambleside at this time and so entranced with the lakes and mountains
+ as to be dreaming of taking or making a house among them, to live in
+ for the rest of her life. Mrs. Trollope, you may have heard, had
+ something of the same nympholepsy&mdash;no, her daughter was 'settled' in
+ the neighbourhood&mdash;<i>that</i> is the more likely reason for Mrs. Trollope!
+ and the spirits of the hills conspired against her the first winter
+ and almost slew her with a fog and drove her away to your Italy where
+ the Oreadocracy has gentler manners. And Miss Martineau is practising
+ mesmerism and miracles on all sides she says, and counts on Archbishop
+ Whately as a new adherent. I even fancy that he has been to see her in
+ the character of a convert. All this from Mr. Kenyon.
+</p>
+<p>
+ There's a strange wild book called the Autobiography of Heinrich
+ Stilling ... one of those true devout deep-hearted Germans who believe
+ everything, and so are nearer the truth, I am sure, than the wise who
+ believe nothing; but rather over-German sometimes, and redolent of
+ sauerkraut&mdash;and <i>he</i> gives a tradition ... somewhere between mesmerism
+ and mysticism, ... of a little spirit with gold shoebuckles, who was
+ his familiar spirit and appeared only in the sunshine I think ...
+ mottling it over with its feet, perhaps, as a child might snow. Take
+ away the shoebuckles and I believe in the little spirit&mdash;don't <i>you</i>?
+ But these English mesmerists make the shoebuckles quite conspicuous
+ and insist on them broadly; and the Archbishops Whately may be drawn
+ by <i>them</i> (who can tell?) more than by the little spirit itself. How
+ is your head to-day? now really, and nothing extenuating? I will not
+ ask of poems, till the 'quite well' is <i>authentic</i>. May God bless you
+ always! my dear friend!
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">E.B.B.
+</p>
+<p>
+ After all the book must go another day. I live in chaos do you know?
+ and I am too hurried at this moment ... yes it is here.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3>
+ <i>R.B. to E.B.B.</i>
+</h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Tuesday Morning.
+</p>
+<p>
+ How are you&mdash;may I hope to hear soon?
+</p>
+<p>
+ I don't know exactly what possessed me to set my next day so far off
+ as Saturday&mdash;as it was said, however, so let it be. And I will bring
+ the rest of the 'Duchess'&mdash;four or five hundred lines,&mdash;'heu, herba
+ mala crescit'&mdash;(as I once saw mournfully pencilled on a white wall at
+ Asolo)&mdash;but will you tell me if you quite remember the main of the
+ <i>first</i> part&mdash;(<i>parts</i> there are none except in the necessary process
+ of chopping up to suit the limits of a magazine&mdash;and I gave them as
+ much as I could transcribe at a sudden warning)&mdash;because, if you
+ please, I can bring the whole, of course.
+</p>
+<p>
+ After seeing <i>you</i>, that Saturday, I was caught up by a friend and
+ carried to see Vidocq&mdash;who did the honours of his museum of knives and
+ nails and hooks that have helped great murderers to their purposes&mdash;he
+ scarcely admits, I observe, an implement with only one attestation to
+ its efficacy; but the one or two exceptions rather justify his
+ latitude in their favour&mdash;thus one little sort of dessert knife <i>did</i>
+ only take <i>one</i> life.... 'But then,' says Vidocq, 'it was the man's
+ own mother's life, with fifty-two blows, and all for' (I think)
+ 'fifteen francs she had got?' So prattles good-naturedly Vidocq&mdash;one
+ of his best stories of that Lacénaire&mdash;'jeune homme d'un caractère
+ fort avenant&mdash;mais c'était un poète,' quoth he, turning sharp on <i>me</i>
+ out of two or three other people round him.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Here your letter breaks in, and sunshine too.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Why do you send me that book&mdash;not let me take it? What trouble for
+ nothing!
+</p>
+<p>
+ An old French friend of mine, a dear foolish, very French heart and
+ soul, is coming presently&mdash;his poor brains are whirling with mesmerism
+ in which he believes, as in all other unbelief. He and I are to dine
+ alone (I have not seen him these two years)&mdash;and I shall never be able
+ to keep from driving the great wedge right through his breast and
+ descending lower, from riveting his two foolish legs to the wintry
+ chasm; for I that stammer and answer hap-hazard with you, get
+ proportionately valiant and voluble with a mere cupful of Diderot's
+ rinsings, and a man into the bargain.
+</p>
+<p>
+ If you were prevented from leaving the house yesterday, assuredly
+ to-day you will never attempt such a thing&mdash;the wind, rain&mdash;all is
+ against it: I trust you will not make the first experiment except
+ under really favourable auspices ... for by its success you will
+ naturally be induced to go on or leave off&mdash;Still you are <i>better</i>! I
+ fully believe, dare to believe, <i>that</i> will continue. As for me, since
+ you ask&mdash;find me but something <i>to do</i>, and see if I shall not be
+ well!&mdash;Though I <i>am</i> well now almost.
+</p>
+<p>
+ How good you are to my roses&mdash;they are not of my making, to be sure.
+ Never, by the way, did Miss Martineau work such a miracle as I now
+ witness in the garden&mdash;I gathered at Rome, close to the fountain of
+ Egeria, a handful of <i>fennel</i>-seeds from the most indisputable plant
+ of fennel I ever chanced upon&mdash;and, lo, they are come up ... hemlock,
+ or something akin! In two places, moreover. Wherein does hemlock
+ resemble fennel? How could I mistake? No wonder that a stone's cast
+ off from that Egeria's fountain is the Temple of the God Ridiculus.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Well, on Saturday then&mdash;at three: and I will certainly bring the
+ verses you mention&mdash;and trust to find you still better.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Vivi felice&mdash;my dear friend, God bless you!
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">R.B.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3>
+ <i>E.B.B. to R.B.</i>
+</h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Wednesday-Thursday Evening<br>
+[Post-mark, July 4, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ Yes&mdash;I know the first part of the 'Duchess' and have it here&mdash;and for
+ the rest of the poem, don't mind about being very legible, or even
+ legible in the usual sense; and remember how it is my boast to be able
+ to read all such manuscript writing as never is read by people who
+ don't like caviare. Now you won't mind? really I rather like blots
+ than otherwise&mdash;being a sort of patron-saint of all manner of
+ untidyness ... if Mr. Kenyon's reproaches (of which there's a
+ stereotyped edition) are justified by the fact&mdash;and he has a great
+ organ of order, and knows 'disorderly persons' at a glance, I suppose.
+ But you won't be particular with <i>me</i> in the matter of transcription?
+ <i>that</i> is what I want to make sure of. And even if you are not
+ particular, I am afraid you are not well enough to be troubled by
+ writing, and writing and the thinking that comes with it&mdash;it would be
+ wiser to wait till you are quite well&mdash;now wouldn't it?&mdash;and my fear
+ is that the 'almost well' means 'very little better.' And why, when
+ there is no motive for hurrying, run any risk? Don't think that I will
+ help you to make yourself ill. That I refuse to do even so much work
+ as the 'little dessert-knife' in the way of murder, ... <i>do</i> think! So
+ upon the whole, I expect nothing on Saturday from this distance&mdash;and
+ if it comes unexpectedly (I mean the Duchess and not Saturday) <i>let</i>
+ it be at no cost, or at the least cost possible, will you? I am
+ delighted in the meanwhile to hear of the quantity of 'mala herba';
+ and hemlock does not come up from every seed you sow, though you call
+ it by ever such bad names.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Talking of poetry, I had a newspaper 'in help of social and political
+ progress' sent to me yesterday from America&mdash;addressed to&mdash;just my
+ name ... <i>poetess, London</i>! Think of the simplicity of those wild
+ Americans in 'calculating' that 'people in general' here in England
+ know what a poetess is!&mdash;Well&mdash;the post office authorities, after
+ deep meditation, I do not doubt, on all probable varieties of the
+ chimpanzee, and a glance to the Surrey Gardens on one side, and the
+ Zoological department of Regent's Park on the other, thought of
+ 'Poet's Corner,' perhaps, and wrote at the top of the parcel, 'Enquire
+ at Paternoster Row'! whereupon the Paternoster Row people wrote again,
+ 'Go to Mr. Moxon'&mdash;and I received my newspaper.
+</p>
+<p>
+ And talking of poetesses, I had a note yesterday (again) which quite
+ touched me ... from Mr. Hemans&mdash;Charles, the son of Felicia&mdash;written
+ with so much feeling, that it was with difficulty I could say my
+ perpetual 'no' to his wish about coming to see me. His mother's memory
+ is surrounded to him, he says, 'with almost a divine lustre'&mdash;and 'as
+ it cannot be to those who knew the writer alone and not the woman.' Do
+ you not like to hear such things said? and is it not better than your
+ tradition about Shelley's son? and is it not pleasant to know that
+ that poor noble pure-hearted woman, the Vittoria Colonna of our
+ country, should be so loved and comprehended by some ... by one at
+ least ... of her own house? Not that, in naming Shelley, I meant for a
+ moment to make a comparison&mdash;there is not equal ground for it.
+ Vittoria Colonna does not walk near Dante&mdash;no. And if you promised
+ never to tell Mrs. Jameson ... nor Miss Martineau ... I would confide
+ to you perhaps my secret profession of faith&mdash;which is ... which is
+ ... that let us say and do what we please and can ... there <i>is</i> a
+ natural inferiority of mind in women&mdash;of the intellect ... not by any
+ means, of the moral nature&mdash;and that the history of Art and of genius
+ testifies to this fact openly. Oh&mdash;I would not say so to Mrs. Jameson
+ for the world. I believe I was a coward to her altogether&mdash;for when
+ she denounced carpet work as 'injurious to the mind,' because it led
+ the workers into 'fatal habits of reverie,' I defended the carpet work
+ as if I were striving <i>pro aris et focis</i>, (<i>I</i>, who am so innocent of
+ all that knowledge!) and said not a word for the poor reveries which
+ have frayed away so much of silken time for me ... and let her go
+ away repeating again and again ... 'Oh, but <i>you</i> may do carpet work
+ with impunity&mdash;yes! <i>because</i> you can be writing poems all the
+ while.'!
+</p>
+<p>
+ Think of people making poems and rugs at once. There's complex
+ machinery for you!
+</p>
+<p>
+ I told you that I had a sensation of cold blue steel from her
+ eyes!&mdash;And yet I really liked and like and shall like her. She is very
+ kind I believe&mdash;and it was my mistake&mdash;and I correct my impressions of
+ her more and more to perfection, as <i>you</i> tell me who know more of her
+ than I.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Only I should not dare, ... <i>ever</i>, I think ... to tell her that I
+ believe women ... all of us in a mass ... to have minds of quicker
+ movement, but less power and depth ... and that we are under your
+ feet, because we can't stand upon our own. Not that we should either
+ be quite under your feet! so you are not to be too proud, if you
+ please&mdash;and there is certainly some amount of wrong&mdash;: but it never
+ will be righted in the manner and to the extent contemplated by
+ certain of our own prophetesses ... nor ought to be, I hold in
+ intimate persuasion. One woman indeed now alive ... and only <i>that</i>
+ one down all the ages of the world&mdash;seems to me to justify for a
+ moment an opposite opinion&mdash;that wonderful woman George Sand; who has
+ something monstrous in combination with her genius, there is no
+ denying at moments (for she has written one book, Leila, which I could
+ not read, though I am not easily turned back,) but whom, in her good
+ and evil together, I regard with infinitely more admiration than all
+ other women of genius who are or have been. Such a colossal nature in
+ every way,&mdash;with all that breadth and scope of faculty which women
+ want&mdash;magnanimous, and loving the truth and loving the people&mdash;and
+ with that 'hate of hate' too, which you extol&mdash;so eloquent, and yet
+ earnest as if she were dumb&mdash;so full of a living sense of beauty, and
+ of noble blind instincts towards an ideal purity&mdash;and so proving a
+ right even in her wrong. By the way, what you say of the Vidocq museum
+ reminds me of one of the chamber of masonic trial scenes in
+ 'Consuelo.' Could you like to see those knives?
+</p>
+<p>
+ I began with the best intentions of writing six lines&mdash;and see what is
+ written! And all because I kept my letter back ... from a <i>doubt about
+ Saturday</i>&mdash;but it has worn away, and the appointment stands good ...
+ for me: I have nothing to say against it.
+</p>
+<p>
+ But belief in mesmerism is not the same thing as general unbelief&mdash;to
+ do it justice&mdash;now is it? It may be super-belief as well. Not that
+ there is not something ghastly and repelling to me in the thought of
+ Dr. Elliotson's great bony fingers seeming to 'touch the stops' of a
+ whole soul's harmonies&mdash;as in phreno-magnetism. And I should have
+ liked far better than hearing and seeing <i>that</i>, to have heard <i>you</i>
+ pour the 'cupful of Diderot's rinsings,' out,&mdash;and indeed I can fancy
+ a little that you and how you could do it&mdash;and break the cup too
+ afterwards!
+</p>
+<p>
+ Another sheet&mdash;and for what?
+</p>
+<p>
+ What is written already, if you read, you do so meritoriously&mdash;and
+ it's an example of bad writing, if you want one in the poems. I am
+ ashamed, you may see, of having written too much, (besides)&mdash;which is
+ <i>much</i> worse&mdash;but one writes and writes: <i>I</i> do at least&mdash;for <i>you</i>
+ are irreproachable. Ever yours my dear friend, as if I had not written
+ ... or <i>had</i>!
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">E.B.B.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3>
+ <i>R.B. to E.B.B.</i>
+</h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Monday Afternoon.<br>
+[Post-mark July 7, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ While I write this,&mdash;3 o'clock you may be going out, I will hope, for
+ the day is very fine, perhaps all the better for the wind: yet I got
+ up this morning sure of bad weather. I shall not try to tell you how
+ anxious I am for the result and to know it. You will of course feel
+ fatigued at first&mdash;but persevering, as you mean to do, do you
+ not?&mdash;persevering, the event must be happy.
+</p>
+<p>
+ I thought, and still think, to write to you about George Sand, and
+ the vexed question, a very Bermoothes of the 'Mental Claims of the
+ Sexes Relatively Considered' (so was called the, ... I do believe, ...
+ worst poem I ever read in my life), and Mrs. Hemans, and all and some
+ of the points referred to in your letter&mdash;but 'by my fay, I cannot
+ reason,' to-day: and, by a consequence, I feel the more&mdash;so I say how
+ I want news of you ... which, when they arrive, I shall read
+ 'meritoriously'&mdash;do you think? My friend, what ought I to tell you on
+ that head (or the reverse rather)&mdash;of your discourse? I should like to
+ match you at a fancy-flight; if I could, give you nearly as pleasant
+ an assurance that 'there's no merit in the case,' but the hot weather
+ and lack of wit get the better of my good will&mdash;besides, I remember
+ once to have admired a certain enticing simplicity in the avowal of
+ the Treasurer of a Charitable Institution at a Dinner got up in its
+ behalf&mdash;the Funds being at lowest, Debt at highest ... in fact, this
+ Dinner was the last chance of the Charity, and this Treasurer's speech
+ the main feature in the chance&mdash;and our friend, inspired by the
+ emergency, went so far as to say, with a bland smile&mdash;'Do not let it
+ be supposed that we&mdash;<i>despise</i> annual contributors,&mdash;we
+ <i>rather</i>&mdash;solicit their assistance.' All which means, do not think
+ that I take any 'merit' for making myself supremely happy, I rather
+ &amp;c. &amp;c.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Always rather mean to deserve it a little better&mdash;but never shall: so
+ it should be, for you and me&mdash;and as it was in the beginning so it is
+ still. You are the&mdash;But you know and why should I tease myself with
+ words?
+</p>
+<p>
+ Let me send this off now&mdash;and to-morrow some more, because I trust to
+ hear you have made the first effort and with success.
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">Ever yours, my dear friend,</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">R.B.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3>
+ <i>E.B.B. to R.B.</i>
+</h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Monday.<br>
+[Post-mark, July 8, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ Well&mdash;I have really been out; and am really alive after it&mdash;which is
+ more surprising still&mdash;alive enough I mean, to write even <i>so</i>,
+ to-night. But perhaps I say so with more emphasis, to console myself
+ for failing in my great ambition of getting into the Park and of
+ reaching Mr. Kenyon's door just to leave a card there vaingloriously,
+ ... all which I did fail in, and was forced to turn back from the
+ gates of Devonshire Place. The next time it will be better
+ perhaps&mdash;and this time there was no fainting nor anything very wrong
+ ... not even cowardice on the part of the victim (be it recorded!) for
+ one of my sisters was as usual in authority and ordered the turning
+ back just according to her own prudence and not my selfwill. Only you
+ will not, any of you, ask me to admit that it was all
+ delightful&mdash;pleasanter work than what you wanted to spare me in taking
+ care of your roses on Saturday! don't ask <i>that</i>, and I will try it
+ again presently.
+</p>
+<p>
+ I ought to be ashamed of writing this I and me-ism&mdash;but since your
+ kindness made it worth while asking about I must not be over-wise and
+ silent on my side.
+</p>
+<p>
+ <i>Tuesday.</i>&mdash;Was it fair to tell me to write though, and be silent of
+ the 'Duchess,' and when I was sure to be so delighted&mdash;and <i>you knew
+ it</i>? <i>I</i> think not indeed. And, to make the obedience possible, I go
+ on fast to say that I heard from Mr. Horne a few days since and that
+ <i>he</i> said&mdash;'your envelope reminds me of'&mdash;<i>you</i>, he said ... and so,
+ asked if you were in England still, and meant to write to you. To
+ which I have answered that I believe you to be in England&mdash;thinking it
+ strange about the envelope; which, as far as I remember, was one of
+ those long ones, used, the more conveniently to enclose to him back
+ again a MS. of his own I had offered with another of his, by his
+ desire, to <i>Colburn's Magazine</i>, as the productions of a friend of
+ mine, when he was in Germany and afraid of his proper fatal
+ onymousness, yet in difficulty how to approach the magazines as a
+ nameless writer (you will not mention this of course). And when he was
+ in Germany, I remember, ... writing just as your first letter came ...
+ that I mentioned it to him, and was a little frankly proud of it! but
+ since, your name has not occurred once&mdash;not once, certainly!&mdash;and it
+ is strange.... Only he <i>can't</i> have heard of your having been here,
+ and it <i>must</i> have been a chance-remark&mdash;altogether! taking an
+ imaginary emphasis from my evil conscience perhaps. Talking of evils,
+ how wrong of you to make that book for me! and how ill I thanked you
+ after all! Also, I couldn't help feeling more grateful still for the
+ Duchess ... who is under ban: and for how long I wonder?
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">My dear friend, I am ever yours,</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">E.B.B.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3>
+ <i>R.B. to E.B.B.</i>
+</h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Wednesday Morning.<br>
+[Post-mark, July 9, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ You are all that is good and kind: I am happy and thankful the
+ beginning (and worst of it) is over and so well. The Park and Mr.
+ Kenyon's all in good time&mdash;and your sister was most prudent&mdash;and you
+ mean to try again: God bless you, all to be said or done&mdash;but, as I
+ say it, no vain word. No doubt it was a mere chance-thought, and <i>à
+ propos de bottes</i> of Horne&mdash;neither he or any other <i>can</i> know or even
+ fancy how it is. Indeed, though on other grounds I should be all so
+ proud of being known for your friend by everybody, yet there's no
+ denying the deep delight of playing the Eastern Jew's part here in
+ this London&mdash;they go about, you know by travel-books, with the tokens
+ of extreme destitution and misery, and steal by blind ways and
+ by-paths to some blank dreary house, one obscure door in it&mdash;which
+ being well shut behind them, they grope on through a dark corridor or
+ so, and then, a blaze follows the lifting a curtain or the like, for
+ they are in a palace-hall with fountains and light, and marble and
+ gold, of which the envious are never to dream! And I, too, love to
+ have few friends, and to live alone, and to see you from week to week.
+ Do you not suppose I am grateful?
+</p>
+<p>
+ And you do like the 'Duchess,' as much as you have got of it? that
+ delights me, too&mdash;for every reason. But I fear I shall not be able to
+ bring you the rest to-morrow&mdash;Thursday, my day&mdash;because I have been
+ broken in upon more than one morning; nor, though much better in my
+ head, can I do anything at night just now. All will come right
+ eventually, I hope, and I shall transcribe the other things you are to
+ judge.
+</p>
+<p>
+ To-morrow then&mdash;only (and that is why I would write) do, do <i>know</i> me
+ for what I am and treat me as I deserve in that <i>one</i> respect, and <i>go
+ out</i>, without a moment's thought or care, if to-morrow should suit
+ you&mdash;leave word to that effect and I shall be as glad as if I saw you
+ or more&mdash;<i>reasoned</i> gladness, you know. Or you can write&mdash;though that
+ is not necessary at all,&mdash;do think of all this!
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">I am yours ever, dear friend,</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">R.B.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3>
+ <i>E.B.B. to R.B.</i>
+</h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">[Post-mark, July 12, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ You understand that it was not a resolution passed in favour of
+ formality, when I said what I did yesterday about not going out at the
+ time you were coming&mdash;surely you do; whatever you might signify to a
+ different effect. If it were necessary for me to go out every day, or
+ most days even, it would be otherwise; but as it is, I may certainly
+ keep the day you come, free from the fear of carriages, let the sun
+ shine its best or worst, without doing despite to you or injury to
+ me&mdash;and that's all I meant to insist upon indeed and indeed. You see,
+ Jupiter Tonans was good enough to come to-day on purpose to deliver
+ me&mdash;one evil for another! for I confess with shame and contrition,
+ that I never wait to enquire whether it thunders to the left or the
+ right, to be frightened most ingloriously. Isn't it a disgrace to
+ anyone with a pretension to poetry? Dr. Chambers, a part of whose
+ office it is, Papa says, 'to reconcile foolish women to their
+ follies,' used to take the side of my vanity, and discourse at length
+ on the passive obedience of some nervous systems to electrical
+ influences; but perhaps my faint-heartedness is besides traceable to a
+ half-reasonable terror of a great storm in Herefordshire, where great
+ storms most do congregate, (such storms!) round the Malvern Hills,
+ those mountains of England. We lived four miles from their roots,
+ through all my childhood and early youth, in a Turkish house my father
+ built himself, crowded with minarets and domes, and crowned with metal
+ spires and crescents, to the provocation (as people used to observe)
+ of every lightning of heaven. Once a storm of storms happened, and we
+ all thought the house was struck&mdash;and a tree was so really, within two
+ hundred yards of the windows while I looked out&mdash;the bark, rent from
+ the top to the bottom ... torn into long ribbons by the dreadful fiery
+ hands, and dashed out into the air, over the heads of other trees, or
+ left twisted in their branches&mdash;torn into shreds in a moment, as a
+ flower might be, by a child! Did you ever see a tree after it has been
+ struck by lightning? The whole trunk of that tree was bare and
+ peeled&mdash;and up that new whiteness of it, ran the finger-mark of the
+ lightning in a bright beautiful rose-colour (none of your roses
+ brighter or more beautiful!) the fever-sign of the certain
+ death&mdash;though the branches themselves were for the most part
+ untouched, and spread from the peeled trunk in their full summer
+ foliage; and birds singing in them three hours afterwards! And, in
+ that same storm, two young women belonging to a festive party were
+ killed on the Malvern Hills&mdash;each sealed to death in a moment with a
+ sign on the chest which a common seal would cover&mdash;only the sign on
+ them was not rose-coloured as on our tree, but black as charred wood.
+ So I get 'possessed' sometimes with the effects of these impressions,
+ and so does one, at least, of my sisters, in a lower degree&mdash;and
+ oh!&mdash;how amusing and instructive all this is to you! When my father
+ came into the room to-day and found me hiding my eyes from the
+ lightning, he was quite angry and called 'it disgraceful to anybody
+ who had ever learnt the alphabet'&mdash;to which I answered humbly that 'I
+ knew it was'&mdash;but if I had been impertinent, I <i>might</i> have added that
+ wisdom does not come by the alphabet but in spite of it? Don't you
+ think so in a measure? <i>non obstantibus</i> Bradbury and Evans? There's a
+ profane question&mdash;and ungrateful too ... after the Duchess&mdash;I except
+ the Duchess and her peers&mdash;and be sure she will be the world's Duchess
+ and received as one of your most striking poems. Full of various power
+ the poem is.... I cannot say how deeply it has impressed me&mdash;but
+ though I want the conclusion, I don't <i>wish</i> for it; and in this, am
+ reasonable for once! You will not write and make yourself ill&mdash;will
+ you? or read 'Sybil' at unlawful hours even? Are you better at all?
+ What a letter! and how very foolishly to-day
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">I am yours,&nbsp;&nbsp;
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">E.B.B.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3>
+ <i>R.B. to E.B.B.</i>
+</h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Sunday Morning.<br>
+[Post-mark, July 14, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ Very well&mdash;I shall say no more on the subject&mdash;though it was not any
+ piece of formality on your part that I deprecated; nor even your
+ over-kindness exactly&mdash;I rather wanted you to be really, wisely kind,
+ and do me a greater favour then the next great one in degree; but you
+ must understand this much in me, how you can lay me under deepest
+ obligation. I daresay you think you have some, perhaps many, to whom
+ your well-being is of deeper interest than to me. Well, if that be
+ so, do for their sakes make every effort with the remotest chance of
+ proving serviceable to you; nor <i>set yourself against</i> any little
+ irksomeness these carriage-drives may bring with them just at the
+ beginning; and you may say, if you like, 'how I shall delight those
+ friends, if I can make this newest one grateful'&mdash;and, as from the
+ known quantity one reasons out the unknown, this newest friend will be
+ one glow of gratitude, he knows that, if you can warm your finger-tips
+ and so do yourself that much real good, by setting light to a dozen
+ 'Duchesses': why ought I not to say this when it is so true? Besides,
+ people profess as much to their merest friends&mdash;for I have been
+ looking through a poem-book just now, and was told, under the head of
+ Album-verses alone, that for A. the writer would die, and for B. die
+ too but a crueller death, and for C. too, and D. and so on. I wonder
+ whether they have since wanted to borrow money of him on the strength
+ of his professions. But you must remember we are in July; the 13th it
+ is, and summer will go and cold weather stay ('<i>come</i>' forsooth!)&mdash;and
+ now is the time of times. Still I feared the rain would hinder you on
+ Friday&mdash;but the thunder did not frighten me&mdash;for you: your father must
+ pardon me for holding most firmly with Dr. Chambers&mdash;his theory is
+ quite borne out by my own experience, for I have seen a man it were
+ foolish to call a coward, a great fellow too, all but die away in a
+ thunderstorm, though he had quite science enough to explain why there
+ was no immediate danger at all&mdash;whereupon his younger brother
+ suggested that he should just go out and treat us to a repetition of
+ Franklin's experiment with the cloud and the kite&mdash;a well-timed
+ proposition which sent the Explainer down with a white face into the
+ cellar. What a grand sight your tree was&mdash;<i>is</i>, for I see it. My
+ father has a print of a tree so struck&mdash;torn to ribbons, as you
+ describe&mdash;but the rose-mark is striking and new to me. We had a good
+ storm on our last voyage, but I went to bed at the end, as I
+ thought&mdash;and only found there had been lightning next day by the bare
+ poles under which we were riding: but the finest mountain fit of the
+ kind I ever saw has an unfortunately ludicrous association. It was at
+ Possagno, among the Euganean Hills, and I was at a poor house in the
+ town&mdash;an old woman was before a little picture of the Virgin, and at
+ every fresh clap she lighted, with the oddest sputtering muttering
+ mouthful of prayer imaginable, an inch of guttery candle, which, the
+ instant the last echo had rolled away, she as constantly blew out
+ again for saving's sake&mdash;having, of course, to <i>light the smoke</i> of
+ it, about an instant after that: the expenditure in wax at which the
+ elements might be propitiated, you see, was a matter for curious
+ calculation. I suppose I ought to have bought the whole taper for some
+ four or five centesimi (100 of which make 8d. English) and so kept the
+ countryside safe for about a century of bad weather. Leigh Hunt tells
+ you a story he had from Byron, of kindred philosophy in a Jew who was
+ surprised by a thunderstorm while he was dining on bacon&mdash;he tried to
+ eat between-whiles, but the flashes were as pertinacious as he, so at
+ last he pushed his plate away, just remarking with a compassionate
+ shrug, 'all this fuss about a piece of pork!' By the way, what a
+ characteristic of an Italian <i>late</i> evening is Summer-lightning&mdash;it
+ hangs in broad slow sheets, dropping from cloud to cloud, so long in
+ dropping and dying off. The 'bora,' which you only get at Trieste,
+ brings wonderful lightning&mdash;you are in glorious June-weather, fancy,
+ of an evening, under green shock-headed acacias, so thick and green,
+ with the cicalas stunning you above, and all about you men, women,
+ rich and poor, sitting standing and coming and going&mdash;and through all
+ the laughter and screaming and singing, the loud clink of the spoons
+ against the glasses, the way of calling for fresh 'sorbetti'&mdash;for all
+ the world is at open-coffee-house at such an hour&mdash;when suddenly there
+ is a stop in the sunshine, a blackness drops down, then a great white
+ column of dust drives straight on like a wedge, and you see the acacia
+ heads snap off, now one, then another&mdash;and all the people scream 'la
+ bora, la bora!' and you are caught up in their whirl and landed in
+ some interior, the man with the guitar on one side of you, and the boy
+ with a cageful of little brown owls for sale, on the other&mdash;meanwhile,
+ the thunder claps, claps, with such a persistence, and the rain, for a
+ finale, falls in a mass, as if you had knocked out the whole bottom of
+ a huge tank at once&mdash;then there is a second stop&mdash;out comes the
+ sun&mdash;somebody clinks at his glass, all the world bursts out laughing,
+ and prepares to pour out again,&mdash;but <i>you</i>, the stranger, <i>do</i> make
+ the best of your way out, with no preparation at all; whereupon you
+ infallibly put your foot (and half your leg) into a river, really
+ that, of rainwater&mdash;that's a <i>Bora</i> (and that comment of yours, a
+ justifiable pun!) Such things you get in Italy, but better, better,
+ the best of all things you do not (<i>I</i> do not) get those. And I shall
+ see you on Wednesday, please remember, and bring you the rest of the
+ poem&mdash;that you should like it, gratifies me more than I will try to
+ say, but then, do not you be tempted by that pleasure of pleasing
+ which I think is your besetting sin&mdash;may it not be?&mdash;and so cut me off
+ from the other pleasure of being profited. As I told you, I like so
+ much to fancy that you see, and will see, what I do as <i>I</i> see it,
+ while it is doing, as nobody else in the world should, certainly, even
+ if they thought it worth while to want&mdash;but when I try and build a
+ great building I shall want you to come with me and judge it and
+ counsel me before the scaffolding is taken down, and while you have to
+ make your way over hods and mortar and heaps of lime, and trembling
+ tubs of size, and those thin broad whitewashing brushes I always had a
+ desire to take up and bespatter with. And now goodbye&mdash;I am to see you
+ on Wednesday I trust&mdash;and to hear you say you are better, still
+ better, much better? God grant that, and all else good for you, dear
+ friend, and so for R.B.
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">ever yours.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3>
+ <i>E.B.B. to R.B.</i>
+</h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">[Post-mark, July 18, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ I suppose nobody is ever expected to acknowledge his or her 'besetting
+ sin'&mdash;it would be unnatural&mdash;and therefore you will not be surprised
+ to hear me deny the one imputed to me for mine. I deny it quite and
+ directly. And if my denial goes for nothing, which is but reasonable,
+ I might call in a great cloud of witnesses, ... a thundercloud, ...
+ (talking of storms!) and even seek no further than this table for a
+ first witness; this letter, I had yesterday, which calls me ... let me
+ see how many hard names ... 'unbending,' ... 'disdainful,' ... 'cold
+ hearted,' ... 'arrogant,' ... yes, 'arrogant, as women always are when
+ men grow humble' ... there's a charge against all possible and
+ probable petticoats beyond mine and through it! Not that either they
+ or mine deserve the charge&mdash;we do not; to the lowest hem of us! for I
+ don't pass to the other extreme, mind, and adopt besetting sins 'over
+ the way' and in antithesis. It's an undeserved charge, and unprovoked!
+ and in fact, the very flower of self-love self-tormented into ill
+ temper; and shall remain unanswered, for <i>me</i>, ... and <i>should</i>, ...
+ even if I could write mortal epigrams, as your Lamia speaks them. Only
+ it serves to help my assertion that people in general who know
+ something of me, my dear friend, are not inclined to agree with you in
+ particular, about my having an 'over-pleasure in pleasing,' for a
+ besetting sin. If you had spoken of my sister Henrietta indeed, you
+ would have been right&mdash;<i>so</i> right! but for <i>me</i>, alas, my sins are not
+ half as amiable, nor given to lean to virtue's side with half such a
+ grace. And then I have a pretension to speak the truth like a Roman,
+ even in matters of literature, where Mr. Kenyon says falseness is a
+ fashion&mdash;and really and honestly I should not be afraid ... I should
+ have no reason to be afraid, ... if all the notes and letters written
+ by my hand for years and years about presentation copies of poems and
+ other sorts of books were brought together and 'conferred,' as they
+ say of manuscripts, before my face&mdash;I should not shrink and be
+ ashamed. Not that I always tell the truth as I see it&mdash;<i>but</i> I <i>never
+ do</i> speak falsely with intention and consciousness&mdash;never&mdash;and I do
+ not find that people of letters are sooner offended than others are,
+ by the truth told in gentleness;&mdash;I do not remember to have offended
+ anyone in this relation, and by these means. Well!&mdash;but <i>from me to
+ you</i>; it is all different, you know&mdash;you must know how different it
+ is. I can tell you truly what I think of this thing and of that thing
+ in your 'Duchess'&mdash;but I must of a necessity hesitate and fall into
+ misgiving of the adequacy of my truth, so called. To judge at all of a
+ work of yours, I must <i>look up to it</i>, and <i>far up</i>&mdash;because whatever
+ faculty <i>I</i> have is included in your faculty, and with a great rim all
+ round it besides! And thus, it is not at all from an over-pleasure in
+ pleasing <i>you</i>, not at all from an inclination to depreciate myself,
+ that I speak and feel as I do and must on some occasions; it is simply
+ the consequence of a true comprehension of you and of me&mdash;and apart
+ from it, I should not be abler, I think, but less able, to assist you
+ in anything. I do wish you would consider all this reasonably, and
+ understand it as a third person would in a moment, and consent not to
+ spoil the real pleasure I have and am about to have in your poetry, by
+ nailing me up into a false position with your gold-headed nails of
+ chivalry, which won't hold to the wall through this summer. Now you
+ will not answer this?&mdash;you will only understand it and me&mdash;and that I
+ am not servile but sincere, but earnest, but meaning what I say&mdash;and
+ when I say I am afraid, you will believe that I am afraid; and when I
+ say I have misgivings, you will believe that I have misgivings&mdash;you
+ will <i>trust</i> me so far, and give me liberty to breathe and feel
+ naturally ... according to my own nature. Probably, or certainly
+ rather, I have one advantage over you, ... one, of which women are not
+ fond of boasting&mdash;that of <i>being older by years</i>&mdash;for the 'Essay on
+ Mind,' which was the first poem published by me (and rather more
+ printed than published after all), the work of my earliest youth, half
+ childhood, half womanhood, was published in 1826 I see. And if I told
+ Mr. Kenyon not to let you see that book, it was not for the date, but
+ because Coleridge's daughter was right in calling it a mere 'girl's
+ exercise'; because it is just <i>that</i> and no more, ... no expression
+ whatever of my nature as it ever was, ... pedantic, and in some things
+ pert, ... and such as altogether, and to do myself justice (which I
+ would fain do of course), I was not in my whole life. Bad books are
+ never like their writers, you know&mdash;and those under-age books are
+ generally bad. Also I have found it hard work to <i>get into
+ expression</i>, though I began rhyming from my very infancy, much as you
+ did (and this, with no sympathy near to me&mdash;I have had to do without
+ sympathy in the full sense&mdash;), and even in my 'Seraphim' days, my
+ tongue clove to the roof of my mouth,&mdash;from leading so conventual
+ recluse a life, perhaps&mdash;and all my better poems were written last
+ year, the very best thing to come, if there should be any life or
+ courage to come; I scarcely know. Sometimes&mdash;it is the real truth&mdash;I
+ have haste to be done with it all. It is the real truth; however to
+ say so may be an ungrateful return for your kind and generous words,
+ ... which I <i>do</i> feel gratefully, let me otherwise feel as I will, ...
+ or must. But then you know you are liable to such prodigious mistakes
+ about besetting sins and even besetting virtues&mdash;to such a set of
+ small delusions, that are sure to break one by one, like other
+ bubbles, as you draw in your breath, ... as I see by the law of my own
+ star, my own particular star, the star I was born under, the star
+ <i>Wormwood</i>, ... on the opposite side of the heavens from the
+ constellations of 'the Lyre and the Crown.' In the meantime, it is
+ difficult to thank you, or <i>not</i> to thank you, for all your
+ kindnesses&mdash;<span title="algos de sigan">&alpha;&lambda;&gamma;&omicron;&sigmaf; &delta;&epsilon; &sigma;&iota;&gamma;&alpha;&nu;</span>. Only Mrs. Jameson told me of Lady
+ Byron's saying 'that she knows she is burnt every day in effigy by
+ half the world, but that the effigy is so unlike herself as to be
+ inoffensive to her,' and just so, or rather just in the converse of
+ <i>so</i>, is it with me and your kindnesses. They are meant for quite
+ another than I, and are too far to be so near. The comfort is ... in
+ seeing you throw all those ducats out of the window, (and how many
+ ducats go in a figure to a 'dozen Duchesses,' it is profane to
+ calculate) the comfort is that you will not be the poorer for it in
+ the end; since the people beneath, are honest enough to push them back
+ under the door. Rather a bleak comfort and occupation though!&mdash;and you
+ may find better work for your friends, who are (some of them) weary
+ even unto death of the uses of this life. And now, you who are
+ generous, <i>be</i> generous, and take no notice of all this. I speak of
+ myself, not of you so there is nothing for you to contradict or
+ discuss&mdash;and if there were, you would be really kind and give me my
+ way in it. Also you may take courage; for I promise not to vex you by
+ thanking you against <i>your</i> will,&mdash;more than may be helped.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Some of this letter was written before yesterday and in reply of
+ course to yours&mdash;so it is to pass for two letters, being long enough
+ for just six. Yesterday you must have wondered at me for being in such
+ a maze altogether about the poems&mdash;and so now I rise to explain that
+ it was assuredly the wine song and no other which I read of yours in
+ <i>Hood's</i>. And then, what did I say of the Dante and Beatrice? Because
+ what I referred to was the exquisite page or two or three on that
+ subject in the 'Pentameron.' I do not remember anything else of
+ Landor's with the same bearing&mdash;do you? As to Montaigne, with the
+ threads of my thoughts smoothly disentangled, I can see nothing
+ coloured by him ... nothing. Do bring all the <i>Hood</i> poems of your
+ own&mdash;inclusive of the 'Tokay,' because I read it in such haste as to
+ whirl up all the dust you saw, from the wheels of my chariot. The
+ 'Duchess' is past speaking of here&mdash;but you will see how I am
+ delighted. And we must make speed&mdash;only taking care of your head&mdash;for
+ I heard to-day that Papa and my aunt are discussing the question of
+ sending me off either to Alexandria or Malta for the winter. Oh&mdash;it
+ is quite a passing talk and thought, I dare say! and it would not <i>be</i>
+ in any case, until September or October; though in every case, I
+ suppose, <i>I</i> should not be much consulted ... and all cases and places
+ would seem better to me (if I were) than Madeira which the physicians
+ used to threaten me with long ago. So take care of your headache and
+ let us have the 'Bells' rung out clear before the summer ends ... and
+ pray don't say again anything about clear consciences or unclear ones,
+ in granting me the privilege of reading your manuscripts&mdash;which is all
+ clear privilege to me, with pride and gladness waiting on it. May God
+ bless you always my dear friend!
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">E.B.B.
+</p>
+<p>
+ You left behind your sister's little basket&mdash;but I hope you did not
+ forget to thank her for my carnations.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3>
+ <i>R.B. to E.B.B.</i>
+</h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">[no date]
+</p>
+<p>
+ I shall just say, at the beginning of a note as at the end, I am yours
+ <i>ever</i>, and not till summer ends and my nails fall out, and my breath
+ breaks bubbles,&mdash;ought you to write thus having restricted me as you
+ once did, and do still? You tie me like a Shrove-Tuesday fowl to a
+ stake and then pick the thickest cudgel out of your lot, and at my
+ head it goes&mdash;I wonder whether you remembered having predicted exactly
+ the same horror once before. 'I was to see you&mdash;and you were to
+ understand'&mdash;<i>Do</i> you? do you understand&mdash;my own friend&mdash;with that
+ superiority in years, too! For I confess to that&mdash;you need not throw
+ that in my teeth ... as soon as I read your 'Essay on Mind'&mdash;(which of
+ course I managed to do about 12 hours after Mr. K's positive refusal
+ to keep his promise, and give me the book) from preface to the 'Vision
+ of Fame' at the end, and reflected on my own doings about that time,
+ 1826&mdash;I did indeed see, and wonder at, your advance over me in
+ years&mdash;what then? I have got nearer you considerably&mdash;(if only
+ nearer)&mdash;since then&mdash;and prove it by the remarks I make at favourable
+ times&mdash;such as this, for instance, which occurs in a poem you are to
+ see&mdash;written some time ago&mdash;which advises nobody who thinks nobly of
+ the Soul, to give, if he or she can help, such a good argument to the
+ materialist as the owning that any great choice of that Soul, which it
+ is born to make and which&mdash;(in its determining, as it must, the whole
+ future course and impulses of that soul)&mdash;which must endure for ever,
+ even though the object that induced the choice should
+ disappear&mdash;owning, I say, that such a choice may be scientifically
+ determined and produced, at any operator's pleasure, by a definite
+ number of ingredients, so much youth, so much beauty, so much talent
+ &amp;c. &amp;c., with the same certainty and precision that another kind of
+ operator will construct you an artificial volcano with so much steel
+ filings and flower of sulphur and what not. There is more in the soul
+ than rises to the surface and meets the eye; whatever does <i>that</i>, is
+ for this world's immediate uses; and were this world <i>all, all</i> in us
+ would be producible and available for use, as it <i>is</i> with the body
+ now&mdash;but with the soul, what is to be developed <i>afterward</i> is the
+ main thing, and instinctively asserts its rights&mdash;so that when you
+ hate (or love) you shall not be so able to explain 'why' ('You' is the
+ ordinary creature enough of my poem&mdash;<i>he</i> might not be so able.)
+</p>
+<p>
+ There, I will write no more. You will never drop <i>me</i> off the golden
+ hooks, I dare believe&mdash;and the rest is with God&mdash;whose finger I see
+ every minute of my life. Alexandria! Well, and may I not as easily ask
+ leave to come 'to-morrow at the Muezzin' as next Wednesday at three?
+</p>
+<p>
+ God bless you&mdash;do not be otherwise than kind to this letter which it
+ costs me pains, great pains to avoid writing better, as
+ truthfuller&mdash;this you get is not the first begun. Come, you shall not
+ have the heart to blame me; for, see, I will send all my sins of
+ commission with <i>Hood</i>,&mdash;blame <i>them</i>, tell me about them, and
+ meantime let me be, dear friend, yours,
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">R.B.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3>
+ <i>E.B.B. to R.B.</i>
+</h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Monday.<br>
+[Post-mark, July 21, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ But I never <i>did</i> strike you or touch you&mdash;and you are not in earnest
+ in the complaint you make&mdash;and this is really all I am going to say
+ to-day. What I said before was wrung from me by words on your part,
+ while you know far too well how to speak so as to make them go
+ deepest, and which sometimes it becomes impossible, or over-hard to
+ bear without deprecation:&mdash;as when, for instance, you talk of being
+ 'grateful' to <i>me</i>!!&mdash;Well! I will try that there shall be no more of
+ it&mdash;no more provocation of generosities&mdash;and so, (this once) as you
+ express it, I 'will not have the heart to blame' you&mdash;except for
+ reading my books against my will, which was very wrong indeed. Mr.
+ Kenyon asked me, I remember, (he had a mania of sending my copybook
+ literature round the world to this person and that person, and I was
+ roused at last into binding him by a vow to do so no more) I remember
+ he asked me ... 'Is Mr. Browning to be excepted?'; to which I answered
+ that nobody was to be excepted&mdash;and thus he was quite right in
+ resisting to the death ... or to dinner-time ... just as you were
+ quite wrong after dinner. Now, could a woman have been more curious?
+ Could the very author of the book have done worse? But I leave my sins
+ and yours gladly, to get into the <i>Hood</i> poems which have delighted me
+ so&mdash;and first to the St. Praxed's which is of course the finest and
+ most powerful ... and indeed full of the power of life ... and of
+ death. It has impressed me very much. Then the 'Angel and Child,' with
+ all its beauty and significance!&mdash;and the 'Garden Fancies' ... some of
+ the stanzas about the name of the flower, with such exquisite music in
+ them, and grace of every kind&mdash;and with that beautiful and musical use
+ of the word 'meandering,' which I never remember having seen used in
+ relation to <i>sound</i> before. It does to mate with your '<i>simmering</i>
+ quiet' in Sordello, which brings the summer air into the room as sure
+ as you read it. Then I like your burial of the pedant so much!&mdash;you
+ have quite the damp smell of funguses and the sense of creeping things
+ through and through it. And the 'Laboratory' is hideous as you meant
+ to make it:&mdash;only I object a little to your tendency ... which is
+ almost a habit, and is very observable in this poem I think, ... of
+ making lines difficult for the reader to read ... see the opening
+ lines of this poem. Not that music is required everywhere, nor in
+ <i>them</i> certainly, but that the uncertainty of rhythm throws the
+ reader's mind off the <i>rail</i> ... and interrupts his progress with you
+ and your influence with him. Where we have not direct pleasure from
+ rhythm, and where no peculiar impression is to be produced by the
+ changes in it, we should be encouraged by the poet to <i>forget it
+ altogether</i>; should we not? I am quite wrong perhaps&mdash;but you see how
+ I do not conceal my wrongnesses where they mix themselves up with my
+ sincere impressions. And how could it be that no one within my hearing
+ ever spoke of these poems? Because it is true that I never saw one of
+ them&mdash;never!&mdash;except the 'Tokay,' which is inferior to all; and that I
+ was quite unaware of your having printed so much with Hood&mdash;or at all,
+ except this 'Tokay,' and this 'Duchess'! The world is very deaf and
+ dumb, I think&mdash;but in the end, we need not be afraid of its not
+ learning its lesson.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Could you come&mdash;for I am going out in the carriage, and will not stay
+ to write of your poems even, any more to-day&mdash;could you come on
+ Thursday or Friday (the day left to your choice) instead of on
+ Wednesday? If I could help it I would not say so&mdash;it is not a caprice.
+ And I leave it to you, whether Thursday or Friday. And Alexandria
+ seems discredited just now for Malta&mdash;and 'anything but Madeira,' I go
+ on saying to myself. These <i>Hood</i> poems are all to be in the next
+ 'Bells' of course&mdash;of necessity?
+</p>
+<p>
+ May God bless you my dear friend, my ever dear friend!&mdash;
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">E.B.B.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3>
+ <i>R.B. to E.B.B.</i>
+</h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Tuesday Morning.<br>
+[Post-mark, July 22, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ I will say, with your leave, Thursday (nor attempt to say anything
+ else without your leave).
+</p>
+<p>
+ The temptation of reading the 'Essay' was more than I could bear: and
+ a wonderful work it is every way; the other poems and their
+ music&mdash;wonderful!
+</p>
+<p>
+ And you go out still&mdash;so continue better!
+</p>
+<p>
+ I cannot write this morning&mdash;I should say too much and have to be
+ sorry and afraid&mdash;let me be safely yours ever, my own dear friend&mdash;
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">R.B.
+</p>
+<p>
+ I am but too proud of your praise&mdash;when will the blame come&mdash;at Malta?
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3>
+ <i>E.B.B. to R.B.</i>
+</h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">[Post-mark, July 25, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ Are you any better to-day? and will you say just the truth of it? and
+ not attempt to do any of the writing which does harm&mdash;nor of the
+ reading even, which may do harm&mdash;and something does harm to you, you
+ see&mdash;and you told me not long ago that you knew how to avoid the harm
+ ... now, did you not? and what could it have been last week which you
+ did not avoid, and which made you so unwell? Beseech you not to think
+ that I am going to aid and abet in this wronging of yourself, for I
+ will not indeed&mdash;and I am only sorry to have given you my querulous
+ queries yesterday ... and to have omitted to say in relation to them,
+ too, how they were to be accepted in any case as just passing thoughts
+ of mine for <i>your</i> passing thoughts, ... some right, it may be ...
+ some wrong, it must be ... and none, insisted on even by the thinker!
+ just impressions, and by no means pretending to be judgments&mdash;now
+ <i>will</i> you understand? Also, I intended (as a proof of my fallacy) to
+ strike out one or two of my doubts before I gave the paper to you&mdash;so
+ <i>whichever strikes you as the most foolish of them, of course must be
+ what I meant to strike out</i>&mdash;(there's ingenuity for you!). The poem
+ did, for the rest, as will be suggested to you, give me the very
+ greatest pleasure, and astonish me in two ways ... by the
+ versification, mechanically considered; and by the successful
+ evolution of pure beauty from all that roughness and rudeness of the
+ sin of the boar-pinner&mdash;successfully evolved, without softening one
+ hoarse accent of his voice. But there is to be a pause now&mdash;you will
+ not write any more&mdash;no, nor come here on Wednesday, if coming into the
+ roar of this London should make the pain worse, as I cannot help
+ thinking it must&mdash;and you were not well yesterday morning, you
+ admitted. You <i>will</i> take care? And if there should be a wisdom in
+ going away...!
+</p>
+<p>
+ Was it very wrong of me, doing what I told you of yesterday? Very
+ imprudent, I am afraid&mdash;but I never knew how to be prudent&mdash;and then,
+ there is not a sharing of responsibility in any sort of imaginable
+ measure; but a mere going away of so many thoughts, apart from the
+ thinker, or of words, apart from the speaker, ... just as I might give
+ away a pocket-handkerchief to be newly marked and mine no longer. I
+ did not do&mdash;and would not have done, ... one of those papers singly.
+ It would have been unbecoming of me in every way. It was simply a
+ writing of notes ... of slips of paper ... now on one subject, and now
+ on another ... which were thrown into the great cauldron and boiled up
+ with other matter, and re-translated from my idiom where there seemed
+ a need for it. And I am not much afraid of being ever guessed
+ at&mdash;except by those Oedipuses who astounded me once for a moment and
+ were after all, I hope, baffled by the Sphinx&mdash;or ever betrayed;
+ because besides the black Stygian oaths and indubitable honour of the
+ editor, he has some interest, even as I have the greatest, in being
+ silent and secret. And nothing <i>is mine</i> ... if something is <i>of me</i>
+ ... or <i>from</i> me, rather. Yet it was wrong and foolish, I see
+ plainly&mdash;wrong in all but the motives. How dreadful to write against
+ time, and with a side-ways running conscience! And then the literature
+ of the day was wider than his knowledge, all round! And the
+ booksellers were barking distraction on every side!&mdash;I had some of the
+ mottos to find too! But the paper relating to you I never was
+ consulted about&mdash;or in <i>one particular way</i> it would have been
+ better,&mdash;as easily it might have been. May God bless you, my dear
+ friend,
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">E.B.B.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3>
+ <i>R.B. to E.B.B.</i>
+</h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Friday Morning.<br>
+[Post-mark, July 25, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ You would let me <i>now</i>, I dare say, call myself grateful to you&mdash;yet
+ such is my jealousy in these matters&mdash;so do I hate the material when
+ it puts down, (or tries) the immaterial in the offices of friendship;
+ that I could almost tell you I was <i>not</i> grateful, and try if that way
+ I could make you see the substantiality of those other favours you
+ refuse to recognise, and reality of the other gratitude you will not
+ admit. But truth is truth, and you are all generosity, and will draw
+ none but the fair inference, so I thank you as well as I can for this
+ <i>also</i>&mdash;this last kindness. And you know its value, too&mdash;how if there
+ were another <i>you</i> in the world, who had done all you have done and
+ whom I merely admired for that; if such an one had sent me such a
+ criticism, so exactly what I want and can use and turn to good; you
+ know how I would have told you, my <i>you</i> I saw yesterday, all about
+ it, and been sure of your sympathy and gladness:&mdash;but the two in one!
+</p>
+<p>
+ For the criticism itself, it is all true, except the over-eating&mdash;all
+ the suggestions are to be adopted, the improvements accepted. I so
+ thoroughly understand your spirit in this, that, just in this
+ beginning, I should really like to have found some point in which I
+ could coöperate with your intention, and help my work by disputing the
+ effect of any alteration proposed, if it ought to be disputed&mdash;<i>that</i>
+ would answer your purpose exactly as well as agreeing with you,&mdash;so
+ that the benefit to me were apparent; but this time I cannot dispute
+ one point. All is for best.
+</p>
+<p>
+ So much for this 'Duchess'&mdash;which I shall ever rejoice in&mdash;wherever
+ was a bud, even, in that strip of May-bloom, a live musical bee hangs
+ now. I shall let it lie (my poem), till just before I print it; and
+ then go over it, alter at the places, and do something for the places
+ where I (really) wrote anyhow, almost, to get done. It is an odd fact,
+ yet characteristic of my accomplishings one and all in this kind, that
+ of <i>the poem</i>, the real conception of an evening (two years ago,
+ fully)&mdash;of <i>that</i>, not a line is written,&mdash;though perhaps after all,
+ what I am going to call the accessories in the story are real though
+ indirect reflexes of the original idea, and so supersede properly
+ enough the necessity of its personal appearance, so to speak. But, as
+ I conceived the poem, it consisted entirely of the Gipsy's description
+ of the life the Lady was to lead with her future Gipsy lover&mdash;a <i>real</i>
+ life, not an unreal one like that with the Duke. And as I meant to
+ write it, all their wild adventures would have come out and the
+ insignificance of the former vegetation have been deducible only&mdash;as
+ the main subject has become now; of course it comes to the same thing,
+ for one would never show half by half like a cut orange.&mdash;
+</p>
+<p>
+ Will you write to me? caring, though, so much for my best interests as
+ not to write if you can work for yourself, or save yourself fatigue. I
+ <i>think</i> before writing&mdash;or just after writing&mdash;such a sentence&mdash;but
+ reflection only justifies my first feeling; I <i>would</i> rather go
+ without your letters, without seeing you at all, if that advantaged
+ you&mdash;my dear, first and last friend; my friend! And now&mdash;surely I
+ might dare say you may if you please get well through God's
+ goodness&mdash;with persevering patience, surely&mdash;and this next winter
+ abroad&mdash;which you must get ready for now, every sunny day, will you
+ not? If I venture to weary you again with all this, is there not the
+ cause of causes, and did not the prophet write that 'there was a tide
+ in the affairs of men, which taken at the E.B.B.' led on to the
+ fortune of
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">Your R.B.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Oh, let me tell you in the bitterness of my heart, that it was only 4
+ o'clock&mdash;that clock I enquired about&mdash;and that, ... no, I shall never
+ say with any grace what I want to say ... and now dare not ... that
+ you all but owe me an extra quarter of an hour next time: as in the
+ East you give a beggar something for a few days running&mdash;then you miss
+ him; and next day he looks indignant when the regular dole falls and
+ murmurs&mdash;'And, for yesterday?'&mdash;Do I stay too long, I <i>want</i> to
+ know,&mdash;too long for the voice and head and all but the spirit that may
+ not so soon tire,&mdash;knowing the good it does. If you would but tell me.
+</p>
+<p>
+ God bless you&mdash;
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3>
+ <i>E.B.B. to R.B.</i>
+</h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Saturday.<br>
+[Post-mark, July 28, 1845]
+</p>
+<p>
+ You say too much indeed in this letter which has crossed mine&mdash;and
+ particularly as there is not a word in it of what I most wanted to
+ know and want to know ... <i>how you are</i>&mdash;for you must observe, if you
+ please, that the very paper you pour such kindness on, was written
+ after your own example and pattern, when, in the matter of my
+ 'Prometheus' (such different wearying matter!), you took trouble for
+ me and did me good. Judge from this, if even in inferior things, there
+ can be gratitude from you to me!&mdash;or rather, do not judge&mdash;but listen
+ when I say that I am delighted to have met your wishes in writing as I
+ wrote; only that you are surely wrong in refusing to see a single
+ wrongness in all that heap of weedy thoughts, and that when you look
+ again, you must come to the admission of it. One of the thistles is
+ the suggestion about the line
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: center">Was it singing, was it saying,
+</p>
+<p style="text-indent: 0em">
+ which you wrote so, and which I proposed to amend by an intermediate
+ 'or.' Thinking of it at a distance, it grows clear to me that you were
+ right, and that there should be and must be no 'or' to disturb the
+ listening pause. Now <i>should</i> there? And there was something else,
+ which I forget at this moment&mdash;and something more than the something
+ else. Your account of the production of the poem interests me very
+ much&mdash;and proves just what I wanted to make out from your statements
+ the other day, and they refused, I thought, to let me, ... that you
+ are more faithful to your first <i>Idea</i> than to your first <i>plan</i>. Is
+ it so? or not? 'Orange' is orange&mdash;but <i>which half</i> of the orange is
+ not predestinated from all eternity&mdash;: is it <i>so</i>?
+</p>
+<p>
+ <i>Sunday.</i>&mdash;I wrote so much yesterday and then went out, not knowing
+ very well how to speak or how to be silent (is it better to-day?) of
+ some expressions of yours ... and of your interest in me&mdash;which are
+ deeply affecting to my feelings&mdash;whatever else remains to be said of
+ them. And you know that you make great mistakes, ... of fennel for
+ hemlock, of four o'clocks for five o'clocks, and of other things of
+ more consequence, one for another; and may not be quite right besides
+ as to my getting well '<i>if I please</i>!' ... which reminds me a little
+ of what Papa says sometimes when he comes into this room unexpectedly
+ and convicts me of having dry toast for dinner, and declares angrily
+ that obstinacy and dry toast have brought me to my present condition,
+ and that if I <i>pleased</i> to have porter and beefsteaks instead, I
+ should be as well as ever I was, in a month!... But where is the need
+ of talking of it? What I wished to say was this&mdash;that if I get better
+ or worse ... as long as I live and to the last moment of life, I shall
+ remember with an emotion which cannot change its character, all the
+ generous interest and feeling you have spent on me&mdash;<i>wasted</i> on me I
+ was going to write&mdash;but I would not provoke any answering&mdash;and in one
+ obvious sense, it need not be so. I never shall forget these things,
+ my dearest friend; nor remember them more coldly. God's goodness!&mdash;I
+ believe in it, as in His sunshine here&mdash;which makes my head ache a
+ little, while it comes in at the window, and makes most other people
+ gayer&mdash;it does <i>me</i> good too in a different way. And so, may God bless
+ you! and me in this ... just this, ... that I may never have the
+ sense, ... intolerable in the remotest apprehension of it ... of
+ being, in any way, directly or indirectly, the means of ruffling your
+ smooth path by so much as one of my flint-stones!&mdash;In the meantime you
+ do not tire me indeed even when you go later for sooner ... and I do
+ not tire myself even when I write longer and duller letters to you (if
+ the last is possible) than the one I am ending now ... as the most
+ grateful (leave me that word) of your friends.
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">E.B.B.
+</p>
+<p>
+ How could you think that I should speak to Mr. Kenyon of the book? All
+ I ever said to him has been that you had looked through my
+ 'Prometheus' for me&mdash;and that I was <i>not disappointed in you</i>, these
+ two things on two occasions. I do trust that your head is better.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3>
+ <i>R.B. to E.B.B.</i>
+</h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">[Post-mark, July 28, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ How must I feel, and what can, or could I say even if you let me say
+ all? I am most grateful, most happy&mdash;most happy, come what will!
+</p>
+<p>
+ Will you let me try and answer your note to-morrow&mdash;before Wednesday
+ when I am to see you? I will not hide from you that my head aches now;
+ and I have let the hours go by one after one&mdash;I am better all the
+ same, and will write as I say&mdash;'Am I better' you ask!
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">Yours I am, ever yours my dear friend R.B.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3>
+ <i>R.B. to E.B.B.</i>
+</h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Thursday.<br>
+[Post-mark, July 31, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ In all I say to you, write to you, I know very well that I trust to
+ your understanding me almost beyond the warrant of any human
+ capacity&mdash;but as I began, so I shall end. I shall believe you remember
+ what I am forced to remember&mdash;you who do me the superabundant justice
+ on every possible occasion,&mdash;you will never do me injustice when I sit
+ by you and talk about Italy and the rest.
+</p>
+<p>
+ &mdash;To-day I cannot write&mdash;though I am very well otherwise&mdash;but I shall
+ soon get into my old self-command and write with as much 'ineffectual
+ fire' as before: but meantime, <i>you</i> will write to me, I hope&mdash;telling
+ me how you are? I have but one greater delight in the world than in
+ hearing from you.
+</p>
+<p>
+ God bless you, my best, dearest friend&mdash;think what I would speak&mdash;
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">Ever yours</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">R.B.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3>
+ <i>E.B.B. to R.B.</i>
+</h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Thursday.<br>
+[Post-mark, August 2, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ Let me write one word ... not to have it off my mind ... because it is
+ by no means heavily <i>on</i> it; but lest I should forget to write it at
+ all by not writing it at once. What could you mean, ... I have been
+ thinking since you went away ... by applying such a grave expression
+ as having a thing 'off your mind' to that foolish subject of the
+ stupid book (mine), and by making it worth your while to account
+ logically for your wish about my not mentioning it to Mr. Kenyon? You
+ could not fancy for one moment that I was vexed in the matter of the
+ book? or in the other matter of your wish? Now just hear me. I
+ explained to you that I had been silent to Mr. Kenyon, first because
+ the fact was so; and next and a little, because I wanted to show how I
+ anticipated your wish by a wish of my own ... though from a different
+ motive. <i>Your</i> motive I really did take to be (never suspecting my
+ dear kind cousin of treason) to be a natural reluctancy of being
+ convicted (forgive me!) of such an arch-womanly curiosity. For my own
+ motive ... motives ... they are more than one ... you must trust me;
+ and refrain as far as you can from accusing me of an over-love of
+ Eleusinian mysteries when I ask you to say just as little about your
+ visits here and of me as you find possible ... <i>even to Mr. Kenyon</i>
+ ... as <i>to every other person whatever</i>. As you know ... and yet more
+ than you know ... I am in a peculiar position&mdash;and it does not follow
+ that you should be ashamed of my friendship or that I should not be
+ proud of yours, if we avoid making it a subject of conversation in
+ high places, or low places. There! <i>that</i> is my request to you&mdash;or
+ commentary on what you put 'off your mind' yesterday&mdash;probably quite
+ unnecessary as either request or commentary; yet said on the chance of
+ its not being so, because you seemed to mistake my remark about Mr.
+ Kenyon.
+</p>
+<p>
+ And your head, how is it? And do consider if it would not be wise and
+ right on that account of your health, to go with Mr. Chorley? You can
+ neither work nor enjoy while you are subject to attacks of the
+ kind&mdash;and besides, and without reference to your present suffering and
+ inconvenience, you <i>ought not</i> to let them master you and gather
+ strength from time and habit; I am sure you ought not. Worse last week
+ than ever, you see!&mdash;and no prospect, perhaps, of bringing out your
+ "Bells" this autumn, without paying a cost too heavy!&mdash;Therefore ...
+ the <i>therefore</i> is quite plain and obvious!&mdash;
+</p>
+<p>
+ <i>Friday.</i>&mdash;Just as it is how anxious Flush and I are, to be delivered
+ from you; by these sixteen heads of the discourse of one of us,
+ written before your letter came. Ah, but I am serious&mdash;and you will
+ consider&mdash;will you not? what is best to be done? and do it. You could
+ write to me, you know, from the end of the world; if you could take
+ the thought of me so far.
+</p>
+<p>
+ And <i>for</i> me, no, and yet yes,&mdash;I <i>will</i> say this much; that I am not
+ inclined to do you injustice, but justice, when you come here&mdash;the
+ justice of wondering to myself how you can possibly, possibly, care to
+ come. Which is true enough to be <i>unanswerable</i>, if you please&mdash;or I
+ should not say it. '<i>As I began, so I shall end</i>&mdash;' Did you, as I hope
+ you did, thank your sister for Flush and for me? When you were gone,
+ he graciously signified his intention of eating the cakes&mdash;brought the
+ bag to me and emptied it without a drawback, from my hand, cake after
+ cake. And I forgot the basket once again.
+</p>
+<p>
+ And talking of Italy and the cardinals, and thinking of some cardinal
+ points you are ignorant of, did you ever hear that I was one of
+</p>
+<blockquote>
+ <blockquote>
+ <blockquote>
+ <blockquote>
+ <blockquote>
+ <blockquote>
+ <blockquote>
+ <blockquote>
+<p>'those schismatiques<br>
+of Amsterdam'
+</p>
+ </blockquote>
+ </blockquote>
+ </blockquote>
+ </blockquote>
+ </blockquote>
+ </blockquote>
+ </blockquote>
+</blockquote>
+<p style="text-indent: 0em">
+ whom your Dr. Donne would have put into the dykes? unless he meant the
+ Baptists, instead of the Independents, the holders of the Independent
+ church principle. No&mdash;not '<i>schismatical</i>,' I hope, hating as I do
+ from the roots of my heart all that rending of the garment of Christ,
+ which Christians are so apt to make the daily week-day of this
+ Christianity so called&mdash;and caring very little for most dogmas and
+ doxies in themselves&mdash;too little, as people say to me sometimes, (when
+ they send me 'New Testaments' to learn from, with very kind
+ intentions)&mdash;and believing that there is only one church in heaven and
+ earth, with one divine High Priest to it; let exclusive religionists
+ build what walls they please and bring out what chrisms. But I used to
+ go with my father always, when I was able, to the nearest dissenting
+ chapel of the Congregationalists&mdash;from liking the simplicity of that
+ praying and speaking without books&mdash;and a little too from disliking
+ the theory of state churches. There is a narrowness among the
+ dissenters which is wonderful; an arid, grey Puritanism in the clefts
+ of their souls: but it seems to me clear that they know what the
+ 'liberty of Christ' <i>means</i>, far better than those do who call
+ themselves 'churchmen'; and stand altogether, as a body, on higher
+ ground. And so, you see, when I talked of the sixteen points of my
+ discourse, it was the foreshadowing of a coming event, and you have
+ had it at last in the whole length and breadth of it. But it is not my
+ fault if the wind began to blow so that I could not go out&mdash;as I
+ intended&mdash;as I shall do to-morrow; and that you have received my
+ dulness in a full libation of it, in consequence. My sisters said of
+ the roses you blasphemed, yesterday, that they 'never saw such flowers
+ anywhere&mdash;anywhere here in London&mdash;' and therefore if I had thought so
+ myself before, it was not so wrong of me. I put your roses, you see,
+ against my letter, to make it seem less dull&mdash;and yet I do not forget
+ what you say about caring to hear from me&mdash;I mean, I do not <i>affect</i>
+ to forget it.
+</p>
+<p>
+ May God bless you, far longer than I can say so.
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">E.B.B.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3>
+ <i>R.B. to E.B.B.</i>
+</h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Sunday Evening.<br>
+[Post-mark, August 4, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ I said what you comment on, about Mr. Kenyon, because I feel I <i>must</i>
+ always tell you the simple truth&mdash;and not being quite at liberty to
+ communicate the whole story (though it would at once clear me from the
+ charge of over-curiosity ... if I much cared for <i>that</i>!)&mdash;I made my
+ first request in order to prevent your getting at any part of it from
+ <i>him</i> which should make my withholding seem disingenuous for the
+ moment&mdash;that is, till my explanation came, if it had an opportunity of
+ coming. And then, when I fancied you were misunderstanding the reason
+ of that request&mdash;and supposing I was ambitious of making a higher
+ figure in <i>his</i> eyes than your own,&mdash;I then felt it 'on my mind' and
+ so spoke ... a natural mode of relief surely! For, dear friend, I have
+ <i>once</i> been <i>untrue</i> to you&mdash;when, and how, and why, you know&mdash;but I
+ thought it pedantry and worse to hold by my words and increase their
+ fault. You have forgiven me that one mistake, and I only refer to it
+ now because if you should ever make <i>that</i> a precedent, and put any
+ least, most trivial word of mine under the same category, you would
+ wrong me as you never wronged human being:&mdash;and that is done with. For
+ the other matter,&mdash;the talk of my visits, it is impossible that any
+ hint of them can ooze out of the only three persons in the world to
+ whom I ever speak of them&mdash;my father, mother and sister&mdash;to whom my
+ appreciation of your works is no novelty since some years, and whom I
+ made comprehend exactly your position and the necessity for the
+ absolute silence I enjoined respecting the permission to see you. You
+ may depend on them,&mdash;and Miss Mitford is in your keeping, mind,&mdash;and
+ dear Mr. Kenyon, if there should be never so gentle a touch of
+ 'garrulous God-innocence' about those kind lips of his. Come, let me
+ snatch at <i>that</i> clue out of the maze, and say how perfect, absolutely
+ perfect, are those three or four pages in the 'Vision' which present
+ the Poets&mdash;a line, a few words, and the man there,&mdash;one twang of the
+ bow and the arrowhead in the white&mdash;Shelley's 'white ideal all
+ statue-blind' is&mdash;perfect,&mdash;how can I coin words? And dear deaf old
+ Hesiod&mdash;and&mdash;all, all are perfect, perfect! But 'the Moon's regality
+ will hear no praise'&mdash;well then, will she hear blame? Can it be you,
+ my own you past putting away, <i>you</i> are a schismatic and frequenter of
+ Independent Dissenting Chapels? And you confess this to <i>me</i>&mdash;whose
+ father and mother went this morning to the very Independent Chapel
+ where they took me, all those years back, to be baptised&mdash;and where
+ they heard, this morning, a sermon preached by the very minister who
+ officiated on that other occasion! Now will you be particularly
+ encouraged by this successful instance to bring forward any other
+ point of disunion between us that may occur to you? Please do not&mdash;for
+ so sure as you begin proving that there is a gulf fixed between us, so
+ sure shall I end proving that ... Anne Radcliffe avert it!... that you
+ are just my sister: not that I am much frightened, but there are such
+ surprises in novels!&mdash;Blame the next,&mdash;yes, now this <i>is</i> to be real
+ blame!&mdash;And I meant to call your attention to it before. Why, why, do
+ you blot out, in that unutterably provoking manner, whole lines, not
+ to say words, in your letters&mdash;(and in the criticism on the
+ 'Duchess')&mdash;if it is a fact that you have a second thought, does it
+ cease to be as genuine a fact, that first thought you please to
+ efface? Why give a thing and take a thing? Is there no significance in
+ putting on record that your first impression was to a certain effect
+ and your next to a certain other, perhaps completely opposite one? If
+ any proceeding of yours could go near to deserve that harsh word
+ 'impertinent' which you have twice, in speech and writing, been
+ pleased to apply to your observations on me; certainly <i>this</i> does go
+ as near as can be&mdash;as there is but one step to take from Southampton
+ pier to New York quay, for travellers Westward. Now will you lay this
+ to heart and perpend&mdash;lest in my righteous indignation I [some words
+ effaced here]! For my own health&mdash;it improves, thank you! And I shall
+ go abroad all in good time, never fear. For my 'Bells,' Mr. Chorley
+ tells me there is no use in the world of printing them before November
+ at earliest&mdash;and by that time I shall get done with these Romances and
+ certainly one Tragedy (<i>that</i> could go to press next week)&mdash;in proof
+ of which I will bring you, if you let me, a few more hundreds of lines
+ next Wednesday. But, 'my poet,' if I would, as is true, sacrifice all
+ my works to do your fingers, even, good&mdash;what would I not offer up to
+ prevent you staying ... perhaps to correct my very verses ... perhaps
+ read and answer my very letters ... staying the production of more
+ 'Berthas' and 'Caterinas' and 'Geraldines,' more great and beautiful
+ poems of which I shall be&mdash;how proud! Do not be punctual in paying
+ tithes of thyme, mint, anise and cummin, and leaving unpaid the real
+ weighty dues of the Law; nor affect a scrupulous acknowledgment of
+ 'what you owe me' in petty manners, while you leave me to settle such
+ a charge, as accessory to the hiding the Talent, as best I can! I have
+ thought of this again and again, and would have spoken of it to you,
+ had I ever felt myself fit to speak of any subject nearer home and me
+ and you than Rome and Cardinal Acton. For, observe, you have not done
+ ... yes, the 'Prometheus,' no doubt ... but with that exception <i>have</i>
+ you written much lately, as much as last year when 'you wrote all your
+ best things' you said, I think? Yet you are better now than then.
+ Dearest friend, <i>I</i> intend to write more, and very likely be praised
+ more, now I care less than ever for it, but still more do I look to
+ have you ever before me, in your place, and with more poetry and more
+ praise still, and my own heartfelt praise ever on the top, like a
+ flower on the water. I have said nothing of yesterday's storm ...
+ <i>thunder</i> ... may you not have been out in it! The evening draws in,
+ and I will walk out. May God bless you, and let you hold me by the
+ hand till the end&mdash;Yes, dearest friend!
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">R.B.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3>
+ <i>E.B.B. to R.B.</i>
+</h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">[Post-mark, August 8, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ Just to show what may be lost by my crossings out, I will tell you the
+ story of the one in the 'Duchess'&mdash;and in fact it is almost worth
+ telling to a metaphysician like you, on other grounds, that you may
+ draw perhaps some psychological good from the absurdity of it. Hear,
+ then. When I had done writing the sheet of annotations and reflections
+ on your poem I took up my pencil to correct the passages reflected on
+ with the reflections, by the crosses you may observe, just glancing
+ over the writing as I did so. Well! and, where that erasure is, I
+ found a line purporting to be extracted from your 'Duchess,' with
+ sundry acute criticisms and objections quite undeniably strong,
+ following after it; only, to my amazement, as I looked and looked, the
+ line so acutely objected to and purporting, as I say, to, be taken
+ from the 'Duchess,' was by no means to be found in the 'Duchess,' ...
+ nor anything like it, ... and I am certain indeed that, in the
+ 'Duchess' or out of it, you never wrote such a bad line in your life.
+ And so it became a proved thing to me that I had been enacting, in a
+ mystery, both poet and critic together&mdash;and one so neutralizing the
+ other, that I took all that pains you remark upon to cross myself out
+ in my double capacity, ... and am now telling the story of it
+ notwithstanding. And there's an obvious moral to the myth, isn't
+ there? for critics who bark the loudest, commonly bark at their own
+ shadow in the glass, as my Flush used to do long and loud, before he
+ gained experience and learnt the <span title="gnôthi seauton">&gamma;&nu;&omega;&theta;&iota; &sigma;&epsilon;&alpha;&upsilon;&tau;&omicron;&nu;</span> in the
+ apparition of the brown dog with the glittering dilating eyes, ... and
+ as <i>I</i> did, under the erasure. And another moral springs up of itself
+ in this productive ground; for, you see, ... '<i>quand je m'efface il
+ n'ya pas grand mal</i>.'
+</p>
+<p>
+ And I am to be made to work very hard, am I? But you should remember
+ that if I did as much writing as last summer, I should not be able to
+ do much else, ... I mean, to go out and walk about ... for really I
+ think I <i>could</i> manage to read your poems and write as I am writing
+ now, with ever so much head-work of my own going on at the same time.
+ But the bodily exercise is different, and I do confess that the
+ novelty of living more in the outer life for the last few months than
+ I have done for years before, make me idle and inclined to be
+ idle&mdash;and everybody is idle sometimes&mdash;even <i>you</i> perhaps&mdash;are you
+ not? For me, you know, I do carpet-work&mdash;ask Mrs. Jameson&mdash;and I never
+ pretend to be in a perpetual motion of mental industry. Still it may
+ not be quite as bad as you think: I have done some work since
+ 'Prometheus'&mdash;only it is nothing worth speaking of and not a part of
+ the romance-poem which is to be some day if I live for it&mdash;lyrics for
+ the most part, which lie written illegibly in pure Egyptian&mdash;oh, there
+ is time enough, and too much perhaps! and so let me be idle a little
+ now, and enjoy your poems while I can. It is pure enjoyment and must
+ be&mdash;but you do not know how much, or you would not talk as you do
+ sometimes ... so wide of any possible application.
+</p>
+<p>
+ And do <i>not</i> talk again of what you would 'sacrifice' for <i>me</i>. If you
+ affect me by it, which is true, you cast me from you farther than ever
+ in the next thought. <i>That</i> is true.
+</p>
+<p>
+ The poems ... yours ... which you left with me,&mdash;are full of various
+ power and beauty and character, and you must let me have my own
+ gladness from them in my own way.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Now I must end this letter. Did you go to Chelsea and hear the divine
+ philosophy?
+</p>
+<p>
+ <i>Tell me the truth always</i> ... will you? I mean such truths as may be
+ painful to me <i>though</i> truths....
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">May God bless you, ever dear friend.</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">E.B.B.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3>
+ <i>R.B. to E.B.B.</i>
+</h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Friday Afternoon.<br>
+[Post-mark, August 8, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ Then there is one more thing 'off my mind': I thought it might be with
+ you as with <i>me</i>&mdash;not remembering how different are the causes that
+ operate against us; different in kind as in degree:&mdash;<i>so</i> much reading
+ hurts me, for instance,&mdash;whether the reading be light or heavy,
+ fiction or fact, and <i>so</i> much writing, whether my own, such as you
+ have seen, or the merest compliment-returning to the weary tribe that
+ exact it of one. But your health&mdash;that before all!... as assuring all
+ eventually ... and on the other accounts you must know! Never, pray,
+ <i>pray</i>, never lose one sunny day or propitious hour to 'go out or walk
+ about.' But do not surprise <i>me</i>, one of these mornings, by 'walking'
+ up to me when I am introduced' ... or I shall infallibly, in spite of
+ all the after repentance and begging pardon&mdash;I shall [words effaced].
+ So here you learn the first 'painful truth' I have it in my power to
+ tell you!
+</p>
+<p>
+ I sent you the last of our poor roses this morning&mdash;considering that I
+ fairly owed that kindness to them.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Yes, I went to Chelsea and found dear Carlyle alone&mdash;his wife is in
+ the country where he will join her as soon as his book's last sheet
+ returns corrected and fit for press&mdash;which will be at the month's end
+ about. He was all kindness and talked like his own self while he made
+ me tea&mdash;and, afterward, brought chairs into the little yard, rather
+ than garden, and smoked his pipe with apparent relish; at night he
+ would walk as far as Vauxhall Bridge on my way home.
+</p>
+<p>
+ If I used the word 'sacrifice,' you do well to object&mdash;I can imagine
+ nothing ever to be done by me worthy such a name.
+</p>
+<p>
+ God bless you, dearest friend&mdash;shall I hear from you before Tuesday?
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">Ever your own</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">R.B.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3>
+ <i>E.B.B. to R.B.</i>
+</h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Friday.<br>
+[Post-mark, August 8, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ It is very kind to send these flowers&mdash;too kind&mdash;why are they sent?
+ and without one single word ... which is not too kind certainly. I
+ looked down into the heart of the roses and turned the carnations over
+ and over to the peril of their leaves, and in vain! Not a word do I
+ deserve to-day, I suppose! And yet if I don't, I don't deserve the
+ flowers either. There should have been an equal justice done to my
+ demerits, O Zeus with the scales!
+</p>
+<p>
+ After all I do thank you for these flowers&mdash;and they are
+ beautiful&mdash;and they came just in a right current of time, just when I
+ wanted them, or something like them&mdash;so I confess <i>that</i> humbly, and
+ do thank you, at last, rather as I ought to do. Only you ought not to
+ give away all the flowers of your garden to <i>me</i>; and your sister
+ thinks so, be sure&mdash;if as silently as you sent them. Now I shall not
+ write any more, not having been written to. What with the Wednesday's
+ flowers and these, you may think how I in this room, look down on the
+ gardens of Damascus, let <i>your Jew</i><a href="#note-20"><b>20</b></a> say what he pleases of
+ <i>them</i>&mdash;and the Wednesday's flowers are as fresh and beautiful, I must
+ explain, as the new ones. They were quite supererogatory ... the new
+ ones ... in the sense of being flowers. Now, the sense of what I am
+ writing seems questionable, does it not?&mdash;at least, more so, than the
+ nonsense of it.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Not a word, even under the little blue flowers!!!&mdash;
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">E.B.B.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3>
+ <i>R.B. to E.B.B.</i>
+</h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Sunday Afternoon.<br>
+[Post-mark, August 11, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ How good you are to the smallest thing I try and do&mdash;(to show I
+ <i>would</i> please you for an instant if I could, rather than from any
+ hope such poor efforts as I am restricted to, can please you or
+ ought.) And that you should care for the note that was not there!&mdash;But
+ I was surprised by the summons to seal and deliver, since time and the
+ carrier were peremptory&mdash;and so, I dared divine, almost, I should hear
+ from you by our mid-day post&mdash;which happened&mdash;and the answer to
+ <i>that</i>, you received on Friday night, did you not? I had to go to
+ Holborn, of all places,&mdash;not to pluck strawberries in the Bishop's
+ Garden like Richard Crouchback, but to get a book&mdash;and there I carried
+ my note, thinking to expedite its delivery: this notelet of yours,
+ quite as little in its kind as my blue flowers,&mdash;this came last
+ evening&mdash;and here are my thanks, dear E.B.B.&mdash;dear friend.
+</p>
+<p>
+ In the former note there is a phrase I must not forget to call on you
+ to account for&mdash;that where it confesses to having done 'some
+ work&mdash;only nothing worth speaking of.' Just see,&mdash;will you be first
+ and only compact-breaker? Nor misunderstand me here, please, ... as I
+ said, I am quite rejoiced that you go out now, 'walk about' now, and
+ put off the writing that will follow thrice as abundantly, all because
+ of the stopping to gather strength ... so I want no new word, not to
+ say poem, not to say the romance-poem&mdash;let the 'finches in the
+ shrubberies grow restless in the dark'&mdash;<i>I</i> am inside with the lights
+ and music: but what is done, is done, <i>pas vrai</i>? And 'worth' is, dear
+ my friend, pardon me, not in your arbitration quite.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Let me tell you an odd thing that happened at Chorley's the other
+ night. I must have mentioned to you that I forget my own verses so
+ surely after they are once on paper, that I ought, without
+ affectation, to mend them infinitely better, able as I am to bring
+ fresh eyes to bear on them&mdash;(when I say 'once on paper' that is just
+ what I mean and no more, for after the sad revising begins they do
+ leave their mark, distinctly or less so according to circumstances).
+ Well, Miss Cushman, the new American actress (clever and
+ truthful-looking) was talking of a new novel by the Dane Andersen, he
+ of the 'Improvisatore,' which will reach us, it should seem, in
+ translation, <i>viâ</i> America&mdash;she had looked over two or three proofs of
+ the work in the press, and Chorley was anxious to know something about
+ its character. The title, she said, was capital&mdash;'Only a
+ Fiddler!'&mdash;and she enlarged on that word, 'Only,' and its
+ significance, so put: and I quite agreed with her for several minutes,
+ till first one reminiscence flitted to me, then another and at last I
+ was obliged to stop my praises and say 'but, now I think of it, <i>I</i>
+ seem to have written something with a similar title&mdash;nay, a play, I
+ believe&mdash;yes, and in five acts&mdash;'Only an Actress'&mdash;and from that
+ time, some two years or more ago to this, I have been every way
+ relieved of it'!&mdash;And when I got home, next morning, I made a dark
+ pocket in my russet horror of a portfolio give up its dead, and there
+ fronted me 'Only a Player-girl' (the real title) and the sayings and
+ doings of her, and the others&mdash;such others! So I made haste and just
+ tore out one sample-page, being Scene the First, and sent it to our
+ friend as earnest and proof I had not been purely dreaming, as might
+ seem to be the case. And what makes me recall it now is, that it was
+ Russian, and about a fair on the Neva, and booths and droshkies and
+ fish-pies and so forth, with the Palaces in the back ground. And in
+ Chorley's <i>Athenæum</i> of yesterday you may read a paper of <i>very</i>
+ simple moony stuff about the death of Alexander, and that Sir James
+ Wylie I have seen at St. Petersburg (where he chose to mistake me for
+ an Italian&mdash;'M. l'Italien' he said another time, looking up from his
+ cards).... So I think to tell you.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Now I may leave off&mdash;I shall see you start, on Tuesday&mdash;hear perhaps
+ something definite about your travelling.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Do you know, 'Consuelo' wearies me&mdash;oh, wearies&mdash;and the fourth volume
+ I have all but stopped at&mdash;there lie the three following, but who
+ cares about Consuelo after that horrible evening with the Venetian
+ scamp, (where he bullies her, and it does answer, after all she says)
+ as we say? And Albert wearies too&mdash;it seems all false, all
+ writing&mdash;not the first part, though. And what easy work these
+ novelists have of it! a Dramatic poet has to <i>make</i> you love or admire
+ his men and women,&mdash;they must <i>do</i> and <i>say</i> all that you are to see
+ and hear&mdash;really do it in your face, say it in your ears, and it is
+ wholly for <i>you</i>, in <i>your</i> power, to <i>name</i>, characterize and so
+ praise or blame, <i>what</i> is so said and done ... if you don't perceive
+ of yourself, there is no standing by, for the Author, and telling you.
+ But with these novelists, a scrape of the pen&mdash;out blurting of a
+ phrase, and the miracle is achieved&mdash;'Consuelo possessed to perfection
+ this and the other gift'&mdash;what would you more? Or, to leave dear
+ George Sand, pray think of Bulwer's beginning a 'character' by
+ informing you that lone, or somebody in 'Pompeii,' 'was endowed with
+ <i>perfect</i> genius'&mdash;'genius'! What though the obliging informer might
+ write his fingers off before he gave the pitifullest proof that the
+ poorest spark of that same, that genius, had ever visited <i>him</i>?
+ <i>Ione</i> has it '<i>perfectly</i>'&mdash;perfectly&mdash;and that is enough! Zeus with
+ the scales? with the false weights!
+</p>
+<p>
+ And now&mdash;till Tuesday good-bye, and be willing to get well as (letting
+ me send <i>porter</i> instead of flowers&mdash;and beefsteaks too!) soon as may
+ be! and may God bless you, ever dear friend.
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">R.B.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3>
+ <i>E.B.B. to R.B.</i>
+</h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">[Post-mark, August 11, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ But if it 'hurts' you to read and write ever so little, why should I
+ be asked to write ... for instance ... 'before Tuesday?' And I did
+ mean to say before to-day, that I wish you never would write to me
+ when you are not <i>quite well</i>, as once or twice you have done if not
+ much oftener; because there is not a necessity, ... and I do not
+ choose that there should ever be, or <i>seem</i> a necessity, ... do you
+ understand? And as a matter of personal preference, it is natural for
+ me to like the silence that does not hurt you, better than the speech
+ that does. And so, remember.
+</p>
+<p>
+ And talking of what may 'hurt' you and me, you would smile, as I have
+ often done in the midst of my vexation, if you knew the persecution I
+ have been subjected to by the people who call themselves (<i>lucus a non
+ lucendo</i>) 'the faculty,' and set themselves against the exercise of
+ other people's faculties, as a sure way to death and destruction. The
+ modesty and simplicity with which one's physicians tell one not to
+ think or feel, just as they would tell one not to walk out in the dew,
+ would be quite amusing, if it were not too tryingly stupid sometimes.
+ I had a doctor once who thought he had done everything because he had
+ carried the inkstand out of the room&mdash;'Now,' he said, 'you will have
+ such a pulse to-morrow.' He gravely thought poetry a sort of
+ disease&mdash;a sort of fungus of the brain&mdash;and held as a serious opinion,
+ that nobody could be properly well who exercised it as an art&mdash;which
+ was true (he maintained) even of men&mdash;he had studied the physiology of
+ poets, 'quotha'&mdash;but that for women, it was a mortal malady and
+ incompatible with any common show of health under any circumstances.
+ And then came the damnatory clause in his experience ... that he had
+ never known 'a system' approaching mine in 'excitability' ... except
+ Miss Garrow's ... a young lady who wrote verses for Lady Blessington's
+ annuals ... and who was the only other female rhymer he had had the
+ misfortune of attending. And she was to die in two years, though she
+ was dancing quadrilles then (and has lived to do the same by the
+ polka), and <i>I</i>, of course, much sooner, if I did not ponder these
+ things, and amend my ways, and take to reading 'a course of history'!!
+ Indeed I do not exaggerate. And just so, for a long while I was
+ persecuted and pestered ... vexed thoroughly sometimes ... my own
+ family, instructed to sing the burden out all day long&mdash;until the time
+ when the subject was suddenly changed by my heart being broken by that
+ great stone that fell out of Heaven. Afterwards I was let do anything
+ I could best ... which was very little, until last year&mdash;and the
+ working, last year, did much for me in giving me stronger roots down
+ into life, ... much. But think of that absurd reasoning that went
+ before!&mdash;the <i>niaiserie</i> of it! For, granting all the premises all
+ round, it is not the <i>utterance</i> of a thought that <i>can</i> hurt anybody;
+ while only the utterance is dependent on the will; and so, what can
+ the taking away of an inkstand do? Those physicians are such
+ metaphysicians! It's curious to listen to them. And it's wise to leave
+ off listening: though I have met with excessive kindness among them,
+ ... and do not refer to Dr. Chambers in any of this, of course.
+</p>
+<p>
+ I am very glad you went to Chelsea&mdash;and it seemed finer afterwards, on
+ purpose to make room for the divine philosophy. Which reminds me (the
+ going to Chelsea) that my brother Henry confessed to me yesterday,
+ with shame and confusion of face, to having mistaken and taken your
+ umbrella for another belonging to a cousin of ours then in the house.
+ He saw you ... without conjecturing, just at the moment, who you were.
+ Do <i>you</i> conjecture sometimes that I live all alone here like Mariana
+ in the moated Grange? It is not quite so&mdash;: but where there are many,
+ as with us, every one is apt to follow his own devices&mdash;and my father
+ is out all day and my brothers and sisters are in and out, and with
+ too large a public of noisy friends for me to bear, ... and I see them
+ only at certain hours, ... except, of course, my sisters. And then as
+ you have 'a reputation' and are opined to talk generally in blank
+ verse, it is not likely that there should be much irreverent rushing
+ into this room when you are known to be in it.
+</p>
+<p>
+ The flowers are ... so beautiful! Indeed it was wrong, though, to send
+ me the last. It was not just to the lawful possessors and enjoyers of
+ them. That it was kind to <i>me</i> I do not forget.
+</p>
+<p>
+ You are too teachable a pupil in the art of obliterating&mdash;and <i>omne
+ ignotum pro terrifico</i> ... and therefore I won't frighten you by
+ walking to meet you for fear of being frightened myself.
+</p>
+<p>
+ So good-bye until Tuesday. I ought not to make you read all this, I
+ know, whether you like to read it or not: and I ought not to have
+ written it, having no better reason than because I like to write on
+ and on. <i>You</i> have better reasons for thinking me very weak&mdash;and I,
+ too good ones for not being able to reproach you for that natural and
+ necessary opinion.
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">May God bless you my dearest friend.</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">E.B.B.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3>
+ <i>R.B. to E.B.B.</i>
+</h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Tuesday Evening.<br>
+[Post-mark, August 13, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ What can I say, or hope to say to you when I see what you do for me?
+</p>
+<p>
+ <i>This</i>&mdash;for myself, (nothing for <i>you</i>!)&mdash;<i>this</i>, that I think the
+ great, great good I get by your kindness strikes me less than that
+ kindness.
+</p>
+<p>
+ All is right, too&mdash;
+</p>
+<p>
+ Come, I <SPAN class="sc-ex">will</span> have my fault-finding at last! So you can decypher my
+ <i>utterest</i> hieroglyphic? Now droop the eyes while I triumph: the
+ plains cower, cower beneath the mountains their masters&mdash;and the
+ Priests stomp over the clay ridges, (a palpable plagiarism from two
+ lines of a legend that delighted my infancy, and now instruct my
+ maturer years in pretty nearly all they boast of the semi-mythologic
+ era referred to&mdash;'In London town, when reigned King Lud, His lords
+ went stomping thro' the mud'&mdash;would all historic records were half as
+ picturesque!)
+</p>
+<p>
+ But you know, yes, <i>you</i> know you are too indulgent by far&mdash;and treat
+ these roughnesses as if they were advanced to many a stage! Meantime
+ the pure gain is mine, and better, the kind generous spirit is mine,
+ (mine to profit by)&mdash;and best&mdash;best&mdash;best, the dearest friend is mine,
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">So be happy</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">R.B.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3>
+ <i>E.B.B. to R.B.</i>
+</h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">[Post-mark, August 13, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ Yes, I admit that it was stupid to read that word so wrong. I thought
+ there was a mistake somewhere, but that it was <i>yours</i>, who had
+ written one word, meaning to write another. 'Cower' puts it all right
+ of course. But is there an English word of a significance different
+ from 'stamp,' in 'stomp?' Does not the old word King Lud's men
+ stomped withal, claim identity with our 'stamping.' The <i>a</i> and <i>o</i>
+ used to 'change about,' you know, in the old English writers&mdash;see
+ Chaucer for it. Still the 'stomp' with the peculiar significance, is
+ better of course than the 'stamp' even with a rhyme ready for it, and
+ I dare say you are justified in daring to put this old wine into the
+ new bottle; and we will drink to the health of the poem in it. It <i>is</i>
+ 'Italy in England'&mdash;isn't it? But I understand and understood
+ perfectly, through it all, that it is <i>unfinished</i>, and in a rough
+ state round the edges. I could not help seeing <i>that</i>, even if I were
+ still blinder than when I read 'Lower' for 'Cower.'
+</p>
+<p>
+ But do not, I ask of you, speak of my 'kindness' ... my
+ kindness!&mdash;mine! It is 'wasteful and ridiculous excess' and
+ mis-application to use such words of me. And therefore, talking of
+ 'compacts' and the 'fas' and 'nefas' of them, I entreat you to know
+ for the future that whatever I write of your poetry, if it isn't to be
+ called 'impertinence,' isn't to be called 'kindness,' any more, ... <i>a
+ fortiori</i>, as people say when they are sure of an argument. Now, will
+ you try to understand?
+</p>
+<p>
+ And talking still of compacts, how and where did I break any compact?
+ I do not see.
+</p>
+<p>
+ It was very curious, the phenomenon about your 'Only a Player-Girl.'
+ What an un-godlike indifference to your creatures though&mdash;your worlds,
+ breathed away from you like soap bubbles, and dropping and breaking
+ into russet portfolios unobserved! Only a god for the Epicurean, at
+ best, can you be? That Miss Cushman went to Three Mile Cross the other
+ day, and visited Miss Mitford, and pleased her a good deal, I fancied
+ from what she said, ... and with reason, from what <i>you</i> say. And
+ 'Only a Fiddler,' as I forgot to tell you yesterday, is announced, you
+ may see in any newspaper, as about to issue from the English press by
+ Mary Howitt's editorship. So we need not go to America for it. But if
+ you complain of George Sand for want of art, how could you bear
+ Andersen, who can see a thing under his eyes and place it under yours,
+ and take a thought separately into his soul and express it insularly,
+ but has no sort of instinct towards wholeness and unity; and writes a
+ book by putting so many pages together, ... just so!&mdash;For the rest,
+ there can be no disagreeing with you about the comparative difficulty
+ of novel-writing and drama-writing. I disagree a little, lower down in
+ your letter, because I could not deny (in my own convictions) a
+ certain proportion of genius to the author of 'Ernest Maltravers,' and
+ 'Alice' (did you ever read those books?), even if he had more
+ impotently tried (supposing it to be possible) for the dramatic
+ laurel. In fact his poetry, dramatic or otherwise, is 'nought'; but
+ for the prose romances, and for 'Ernest Maltravers' above all, I must
+ lift up my voice and cry. And I read the <i>Athenæum</i> about your Sir
+ James Wylie who took you for an Italian....
+</p>
+<blockquote>
+ <blockquote>
+ <blockquote>
+ <blockquote>
+ <blockquote>
+ <blockquote>
+ <blockquote>
+<p style="text-indent: 0em">'Poi vi dirò Signor, che ne fu causa<br>
+Ch' avio fatto al scriver debita pausa.'&mdash;
+</p>
+ </blockquote>
+ </blockquote>
+ </blockquote>
+ </blockquote>
+ </blockquote>
+ </blockquote>
+</blockquote>
+<p style="text-align: right">
+Ever your&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">
+E.B.B.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3>
+ <i>R.B. to E.B.B.</i>
+</h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Friday Morning.<br>
+[Post-mark, August 15, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ Do you know, dear friend, it is no good policy to stop up all the
+ vents of my feeling, nor leave one for safety's sake, as you will do,
+ let me caution you never so repeatedly. I know, quite well enough,
+ that your 'kindness' is not <i>so</i> apparent, even, in this instance of
+ correcting my verses, as in many other points&mdash;but on such points, you
+ lift a finger to me and I am dumb.... Am I not to be allowed a word
+ here neither?
+</p>
+<p>
+ I remember, in the first season of German Opera here, when 'Fidelio's'
+ effects were going, going up to the gallery in order to get the best
+ of the last chorus&mdash;get its oneness which you do&mdash;and, while perched
+ there an inch under the ceiling, I was amused with the enormous
+ enthusiasm of an elderly German (we thought,&mdash;I and a cousin of
+ mine)&mdash;whose whole body broke out in billow, heaved and swayed in the
+ perfection of his delight, hands, head, feet, all tossing and striving
+ to utter what possessed him. Well&mdash;next week, we went again to the
+ Opera, and again mounted at the proper time, but the crowd was
+ <i>greater</i>, and our mild great faced white haired red cheeked German
+ was not to be seen, not at first&mdash;for as the glory was at its full, my
+ cousin twisted me round and made me see an arm, only an arm, all the
+ body of its owner being amalgamated with a dense crowd on each side,
+ before, and&mdash;not behind, because they, the crowd, occupied the last
+ benches, over which we looked&mdash;and this arm waved and exulted as if
+ 'for the dignity of the whole body,'&mdash;relieved it of its dangerous
+ accumulation of repressed excitability. When the crowd broke up all
+ the rest of the man disengaged itself by slow endeavours, and there
+ stood our friend confessed&mdash;as we were sure!
+</p>
+<p>
+ &mdash;Now, you would have bade him keep his arm quiet? 'Lady Geraldine,
+ you <i>would</i>!'
+</p>
+<p>
+ I have read those novels&mdash;but I must keep that word of words,
+ 'genius'&mdash;for something different&mdash;'talent' will do here surely.
+</p>
+<p>
+ There lies 'Consuelo'&mdash;done with!
+</p>
+<p>
+ I shall tell you frankly that it strikes me as precisely what in
+ conventional language with the customary silliness is styled a
+ <i>woman's</i> book, in its merits and defects,&mdash;and supremely timid in all
+ the points where one wants, and has a right to expect, some <i>fruit</i> of
+ all the pretence and George Sand<i>ism</i>. These are occasions when one
+ does say, in the phrase of her school, 'que la Femme parle!' or what
+ is better, let her act! and how does Consuelo comfort herself on such
+ an emergency? Why, she bravely lets the uninspired people throw down
+ one by one their dearest prejudices at her feet, and then, like a
+ very actress, picks them up, like so many flowers, returning them to
+ the breast of the owners with a smile and a courtesy and trips off the
+ stage with a glance at the Pit. Count Christian, Baron Frederic,
+ Baroness&mdash;what is her name&mdash;all open their arms, and Consuelo will not
+ consent to entail disgrace &amp;c. &amp;c. No, you say&mdash;she leaves them in
+ order to solve the problem of her true feeling, whether she can really
+ love Albert; but remember that this is done, (that is, so much of it
+ as ever <i>is</i> done, and as determines her to accept his hand at the
+ very last)&mdash;this is solved sometime about the next morning&mdash;or
+ earlier&mdash;I forget&mdash;and in the meantime, Albert gets that 'benefit of
+ the doubt' of which chapter the last informs you. As for the
+ hesitation and self examination on the matter of that Anzoleto&mdash;the
+ writer is turning over the leaves of a wrong dictionary, seeking help
+ from Psychology, and pretending to forget there is such a thing as
+ Physiology. Then, that horrible Porpora:&mdash;if George Sand gives <i>him</i>
+ to a Consuelo for an absolute master, in consideration of his services
+ specified, and is of opinion that <i>they</i> warrant his conduct, or at
+ least, oblige submission to it,&mdash;then, I find her objections to the
+ fatherly rule of Frederic perfectly impertinent&mdash;he having a few
+ claims upon the gratitude of Prussia also, in his way, I believe! If
+ the strong ones <i>will make</i> the weak ones lead them&mdash;then, for
+ Heaven's sake, let this dear old all-abused world keep on its course
+ without these outcries and tearings of hair, and don't be for ever
+ goading the Karls and other trodden-down creatures till they get their
+ carbines in order (very rationally) to abate the nuisance&mdash;when you
+ make the man a long speech against some enormity he is about to
+ commit, and adjure and beseech and so forth, till he throws down the
+ aforesaid carbine, falls on his knees, and lets the Frederic go
+ quietly on his way to keep on killing his thousands after the fashion
+ that moved your previous indignation. Now is that right,
+ consequential&mdash;that is, <i>inferential</i>; logically deduced, going
+ straight to the end&mdash;<i>manly</i>?
+</p>
+<p>
+ The accessories are not the Principal, the adjuncts&mdash;the essence, nor
+ the ornamental incidents the book's self, so what matters it if the
+ portraits are admirable, the descriptions eloquent, (eloquent, there
+ it is&mdash;that is her characteristic&mdash;what she <i>has</i> to speak, she
+ <i>speaks out</i>, speaks volubly <i>forth</i>, too well, inasmuch as you say,
+ advancing a step or two, 'And now speak as completely <i>here</i>'&mdash;and she
+ says nothing)&mdash;but all <i>that</i>, another could do, as others have
+ done&mdash;but 'la femme qui parle'&mdash;Ah, that, is <i>this</i> all? So I am not
+ George Sand's&mdash;she teaches me nothing&mdash;I look to her for nothing.
+</p>
+<p>
+ I am ever yours, dearest friend. How I write to you&mdash;page on page! But
+ Tuesday&mdash;who could wait till then! Shall I not hear from you?
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">God bless you ever</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">R.B.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3>
+ <i>E.B.B. to R.B.</i>
+</h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Saturday.<br>
+[Post-mark, August 16, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ But what likeness is there between opposites; and what has 'M.
+ l'Italien' to do with the said 'elderly German'? See how little! For
+ to bring your case into point, somebody should have been playing on a
+ Jew's harp for the whole of the orchestra; and the elderly German
+ should have quoted something about 'Harp of Judah' to the Venetian
+ behind him! And there, you would have proved your analogy!&mdash;Because
+ you see, my dear friend, it was not the expression, but the thing
+ expressed, I cried out against&mdash;the exaggeration in your mind. I am
+ sorry when I write what you do not like&mdash;but I have instincts and
+ impulses too strong for me when you say things which put me into such
+ a miserably false position in respect to you&mdash;as for instance, when in
+ this very last letter (oh, I <i>must</i> tell you!) you talk of my
+ 'correcting your verses'! My correcting your verses!!!&mdash;Now is <i>that</i>
+ a thing for you to say?&mdash;And do you really imagine that if I kept that
+ happily imagined phrase in my thoughts, I should be able to tell you
+ one word of my impressions from your poetry, ever, ever again? Do you
+ not see at once what a disqualifying and paralysing phrase it must be,
+ of simple necessity? So it is <i>I</i> who have reason to complain, ... it
+ appears to <i>me</i>, ... and by no means <i>you</i>&mdash;and in your 'second
+ consideration' you become aware of it, I do not at all doubt.
+</p>
+<p>
+ As to 'Consuelo' I agree with nearly all that you say of it&mdash;though
+ George Sand, we are to remember, is greater than 'Consuelo,' and not
+ to be depreciated according to the defects of that book, nor
+ classified as 'femme qui parle' ... she who is man and woman together,
+ ... judging her by the standard of even that book in the nobler
+ portions of it. For the inconsequency of much in the book, I admit it
+ of course&mdash;and <i>you</i> will admit that it is the rarest of phenomena
+ when men ... men of logic ... follow their own opinions into their
+ obvious results&mdash;nobody, you know, ever thinks of doing such a thing:
+ to pursue one's own inferences is to rush in where angels ... perhaps
+ ... do <i>not</i> fear to tread, ... but where there will not be much other
+ company. So the want of practical logic shall be a human fault rather
+ than a womanly one, if you please: and you must please also to
+ remember that 'Consuelo' is only 'half the orange'; and that when you
+ complain of its not being a whole one, you overlook that hand which is
+ holding to you the 'Comtesse de Rudolstadt' in three volumes! Not that
+ I, who have read the whole, profess a full satisfaction about Albert
+ and the rest&mdash;and Consuelo is made to be happy by a mere clap-trap at
+ last: and Mme. Dudevant has her specialities,&mdash;in which, other women,
+ I fancy, have neither part nor lot, ... even <i>here</i>!&mdash;Altogether, the
+ book is a sort of rambling 'Odyssey,' a female 'Odyssey,' if you like,
+ but full of beauty and nobleness, let the faults be where they may.
+ And then, I like those long, long books, one can live away into ...
+ leaving the world and above all oneself, quite at the end of the
+ avenue of palms&mdash;quite out of sight and out of hearing!&mdash;Oh, I have
+ felt something like <i>that</i> so often&mdash;so often! and <i>you</i> never felt
+ it, and never will, I hope.
+</p>
+<p>
+ But if Bulwer had written nothing but the 'Ernest Maltravers' books,
+ you would think perhaps more highly of him. Do you <i>not</i> think it
+ possible now? It is his most impotent struggling into poetry, which
+ sets about proving a negative of genius on him&mdash;<i>that</i>, which the
+ <i>Athenæum praises</i> as 'respectable attainment in various walks of
+ literature'&mdash;! <i>like</i> the <i>Athenæum</i>, isn't it? and worthy praise, to
+ be administered by professed judges of art? What is to be expected of
+ the public, when the teachers of the public teach <i>so</i>?&mdash;
+</p>
+<p>
+ When you come on Tuesday, do not forget the MS. if any is done&mdash;only
+ don't let it be done so as to tire and hurt you&mdash;mind! And good-bye
+ until Tuesday, from
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">E.B.B.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3>
+ <i>E.B.B. to R.B.</i>
+</h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Sunday.<br>
+[Post-mark, August 18, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ I am going to propose to you to give up Tuesday, and to take your
+ choice of two or three other days, say Friday, or Saturday, or
+ to-morrow ... Monday. Mr. Kenyon was here to-day and talked of leaving
+ London on Friday, and of visiting me again on 'Tuesday' ... he said,
+ ... but that is an uncertainty, and it may be Tuesday or Wednesday or
+ Thursday. So I thought (wrong or right) that out of the three
+ remaining days you would not mind choosing one. And if you do choose
+ the Monday, there will be no need to write&mdash;nor time indeed&mdash;; but if
+ the Friday or Saturday, I shall hear from you, perhaps. Above all
+ things remember, my dear friend, that I shall not expect you
+ to-morrow, except as by a <i>bare possibility</i>. In great haste, signed
+ and sealed this Sunday evening by
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">E.B.B.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3>
+ <i>R.B. to E.B.B.</i>
+</h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Monday, 7 P.M.<br>
+[Post-mark, August 19, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ I this moment get your note&mdash;having been out since the early
+ morning&mdash;and I must write just to catch the post. You are pure
+ kindness and considerateness, <i>no</i> thanks to you!&mdash;(since you will
+ have it so&mdash;). I choose Friday, then,&mdash;but I shall hear from you
+ before Thursday, I dare hope? I have all but passed your house
+ to-day&mdash;with an Italian friend, from Rome, whom I must go about with a
+ little on weariful sight seeing, so I shall earn Friday.
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">Bless you</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">R.B.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3>
+ <i>E.B.B. to R.B.</i>
+</h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Tuesday.<br>
+[Post-mark, August 20, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ I fancied it was just <i>so</i>&mdash;as I did not hear and did not see you on
+ Monday. Not that you were expected particularly&mdash;but that you would
+ have written your own negative, it appeared to me, by some post in the
+ day, if you had received my note in time. It happened well too,
+ altogether, as you have a friend with you, though Mr. Kenyon does not
+ come, and will not come, I dare say; for he spoke like a doubter at
+ the moment; and as this Tuesday wears on, I am not likely to have any
+ visitors on it after all, and may as well, if the rain quite ceases,
+ go and spend my solitude on the park a little. Flush wags his tail at
+ that proposition when I speak it loud out. And I am to write to you
+ before Friday, and so, am writing, you see ... which I should not,
+ should not have done if I had not been told; because it is not my turn
+ to write, ... did you think it was?
+</p>
+<p>
+ Not a word of Malta! except from Mr. Kenyon who talked homilies of it
+ last Sunday and wanted to speak them to Papa&mdash;but it would not do in
+ any way&mdash;now especially&mdash;and in a little time there will be a
+ decision for or against; and I am afraid of <i>both</i> ... which is a
+ happy state of preparation. Did I not tell you that early in the
+ summer I did some translations for Miss Thomson's 'Classical Album,'
+ from Bion and Theocritus, and Nonnus the author of that large (not
+ great) poem in some forty books of the 'Dionysiaca' ... and the
+ paraphrases from Apuleius? Well&mdash;I had a letter from her the other
+ day, full of compunction and ejaculation, and declaring the fact that
+ Mr. Burges had been correcting all the proofs of the poems; leaving
+ out and emending generally, according to his own particular idea of
+ the pattern in the mount&mdash;is it not amusing? I have been wicked enough
+ to write in reply that it is happy for her and all readers ... <i>sua si
+ bona norint</i> ... if during some half hour which otherwise might have
+ been dedicated by Mr. Burges to patting out the lights of Sophocles
+ and his peers, he was satisfied with the humbler devastation of E.B.B.
+ upon Nonnus. You know it is impossible to help being amused. This
+ correcting is a mania with that man! And then I, who wrote what I did
+ from the 'Dionysiaca,' with no respect for 'my author,' and an
+ arbitrary will to 'put the case' of Bacchus and Ariadne as well as I
+ could, for the sake of the art-illustrations, ... those subjects Miss
+ Thomson sent me, ... and did it all with full liberty and persuasion
+ of soul that nobody would think it worth while to compare English with
+ Greek and refer me back to Nonnus and detect my wanderings from the
+ text!! But the critic was not to be cheated so! And I do not doubt
+ that he has set me all 'to rights' from beginning to end; and combed
+ Ariadne's hair close to her cheeks for me. Have <i>you</i> known Nonnus,
+ ... <i>you</i> who forget nothing? and have known everything, I think? For
+ it is quite startling, I must tell you, quite startling and
+ humiliating, to observe how you combine such large tracts of
+ experience of outer and inner life, of books and men, of the world and
+ the arts of it; curious knowledge as well as general knowledge ... and
+ deep thinking as well as wide acquisition, ... and you, looking none
+ the older for it all!&mdash;yes, and being besides a man of genius and
+ working your faculty and not wasting yourself over a surface or away
+ from an end. Dugald Stewart said that genius made naturally a
+ lop-sided mind&mdash;did he not? He ought to have known <i>you</i>. And <i>I</i> who
+ do ... a little ... (for I grow more loth than I was to assume the
+ knowledge of you, my dear friend)&mdash;<i>I</i> do not mean to use that word
+ 'humiliation' in the sense of having felt the thing myself in any
+ <i>painful</i> way, ... because I never for a moment did, or <i>could</i>, you
+ know,&mdash;never could ... never did ... except indeed when you have over
+ praised me, which forced another personal feeling in. Otherwise it has
+ always been quite pleasant to me to be 'startled and humiliated'&mdash;and
+ more so perhaps than to be startled and exalted, if I might choose....
+</p>
+<p>
+ Only I did not mean to write all this, though you told me to write to
+ you. But the rain which keeps one in, gives one an example of pouring
+ on ... and you must endure as you can or will. Also ... as you have a
+ friend with you 'from Italy' ... 'from Rome,' and commended me for my
+ 'kindness and considerateness' in changing Tuesday to Friday ...
+ (wasn't it?...) shall I still be more considerate and put off the
+ visit-day to next week? mind, you let it be as you like it best to
+ be&mdash;I mean, as is most convenient 'for the nonce' to you and your
+ friend&mdash;because all days are equal, as to that matter of convenience,
+ to your other friend of this ilk,
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">E.B.B.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3>
+ <i>R.B. to E.B.B.</i>
+</h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Wednesday Morning.<br>
+[Post-mark, August 20, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ Mauvaise, mauvaise, mauvaise, you know as I know, just as much, that
+ your 'kindness and considerateness' consisted, not in putting off
+ Tuesday for another day, but in caring for my coming at all; for my
+ coming and being told at the door that you were engaged, and <i>I</i> might
+ call another time! And you are <SPAN class="sc-ex">not, not</span> my 'other friend,' any more
+ than this head of mine is my <i>other</i> head, seeing that I have got a
+ violin which has a head too! All which, beware lest you get fully told
+ in the letter I will write this evening, when I have done with my
+ Romans&mdash;who are, it so happens, here at this minute; that is, have
+ left the house for a few minutes with my sister&mdash;but are not 'with
+ me,' as you seem to understand it,&mdash;in the house to stay. They were
+ kind to me in Rome, (husband and wife), and I am bound to be of what
+ use I may during their short stay. Let me lose no time in begging and
+ praying you to cry 'hands off' to that dreadful Burgess; have not I
+ got a ... but I will tell you to-night&mdash;or on Friday which is my day,
+ please&mdash;Friday. Till when, pray believe me, with respect and esteem,
+</p>
+<p>
+ Your most obliged and disobliged at these blank endings&mdash;what have I
+ done? God bless you ever dearest friend.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3>
+ <i>R.B. to E.B.B.</i>
+</h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Thursday, 7 o'clock.<br>
+[Post-mark, August 21, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ I feel at home, this blue early morning, now that I sit down to write
+ (or, <i>speak</i>, as I try and fancy) to you, after a whole day with those
+ 'other friends'&mdash;dear good souls, whom I should be so glad to serve,
+ and to whom service must go by way of last will and testament, if a
+ few more hours of 'social joy,' 'kindly intercourse,' &amp;c., fall to my
+ portion. My friend the Countess began proceedings (when I first saw
+ her, not yesterday) by asking 'if I had got as much money as I
+ expected by any works published of late?'&mdash;to which I answered, of
+ course, 'exactly as much'&mdash;<i>è grazioso</i>! (All the same, if you were to
+ ask her, or the like of her, 'how much the stone-work of the Coliseum
+ would fetch, properly burned down to lime?'&mdash;she would shudder from
+ head to foot and call you 'barbaro' with good Trojan heart.) Now you
+ suppose&mdash;(watch my rhetorical figure here)&mdash;you suppose I am going to
+ congratulate myself on being so much for the better, <i>en pays de
+ connaissance</i>, with my 'other friend,' E.B.B., number 2&mdash;or 200, why
+ not?&mdash;whereas I mean to 'fulmine over Greece,' since thunder frightens
+ you, for all the laurels,&mdash;and to have reason for your taking my own
+ part and lot to yourself&mdash;I do, will, must, and <i>will</i>, again, wonder
+ at <i>you</i> and admire <i>you</i>, and so on to the climax. It is a fixed,
+ immovable thing: so fixed that I can well forego talking about it. But
+ if to talk you once begin, 'the King shall enjoy (or receive quietly)
+ his own again'&mdash;I wear no bright weapon out of that Panoply ... or
+ Panoplite, as I think you call Nonnus, nor ever, like Leigh Hunt's
+ 'Johnny, ever blythe and bonny, went singing Nonny, nonny' and see
+ to-morrow, what a vengeance I will take for your 'mere suspicion in
+ that kind'! But to the serious matter ... nay, I said yesterday, I
+ believe&mdash;keep off that Burgess&mdash;he is stark staring mad&mdash;mad, do you
+ know? The last time I met him he told me he had recovered I forget how
+ many of the lost books of Thucydides&mdash;found them imbedded in Suidas (I
+ think), and had disengaged them from <i>his</i> Greek, without loss of a
+ letter, 'by an instinct he, Burgess, had'&mdash;(I spell his name wrongly
+ to help the proper <i>hiss</i> at the end). Then, once on a time, he found
+ in the 'Christus Patiens,' an odd dozen of lines, clearly dropped out
+ of the 'Prometheus,' and proving that Æschylus was aware of the
+ invention of gunpowder. He wanted to help Dr. Leonhard Schmitz in his
+ 'Museum'&mdash;and scared him, as Schmitz told me. What business has he,
+ Burges, with English verse&mdash;and what on earth, or under it, has Miss
+ Thomson to do with <i>him</i>. If she must displease one of two, why is Mr.
+ B. not to be thanked and 'sent to feed,' as the French say prettily?
+ At all events, do pray see what he has presumed to alter ... you can
+ alter at sufficient warrant, profit by suggestion, I should think! But
+ it is all Miss Thomson's shame and fault: because she is quite in her
+ propriety, saying to such intermeddlers, gently for the sake of their
+ poor weak heads, 'very good, I dare say, very desirable emendations,
+ only the work is not mine, you know, but my friend's, and you must no
+ more alter it without her leave, than alter this sketch, this
+ illustration, because you think you could mend Ariadne's face or
+ figure,&mdash;Fecit Tizianus, scripsit E.B.B.' Dear friend, you will tell
+ Miss Thomson to stop further proceedings, will you not? There! only,
+ do mind what I say?
+</p>
+<p>
+ And now&mdash;till to-morrow! It seems an age since I saw you. I want to
+ catch our first post ... (this phrase I ought to get stereotyped&mdash;I
+ need it so constantly). The day is fine ... you will profit by it, I
+ trust. 'Flush, wag your tail and grow restless and scratch at the
+ door!'
+</p>
+<p>
+ God bless you,&mdash;my one friend, without an 'other'&mdash;bless you ever&mdash;
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">R.B.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3>
+ <i>E.B.B. to R.B.</i>
+</h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Wednesday.<br>
+[Post-mark, August 25, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ But what have <i>I</i> done that you should ask what have <i>you</i> done? I
+ have not brought any accusation, have I ... no, nor <i>thought</i> any, I
+ am sure&mdash;and it was only the 'kindness and considerateness'&mdash;argument
+ that was irresistible as a thing to be retorted, when your thanks came
+ so naturally and just at the corner of an application. And then, you
+ know, it is gravely true, seriously true, sadly true, that I am always
+ expecting to hear or to see how tired you are at last of me!&mdash;sooner
+ or later, you know!&mdash;But I did not mean any seriousness in that
+ letter. No, nor did I mean ... (to pass to another question ...) to
+ provoke you to the
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: center">Mister Hayley ... so are <i>you</i>....
+</p>
+<p style="text-indent: 0em">
+ reply complimentary. All I observed concerning yourself, was the
+ <i>combination</i>&mdash;which not an idiom in chivalry could treat
+ grammatically as a thing common to <i>me</i> and you, inasmuch as everyone
+ who has known me for half a day, may know that, if there is anything
+ peculiar in me, it lies for the most part in an extraordinary
+ deficiency in this and this and this, ... there is no need to describe
+ what. Only nuns of the strictest sect of the nunneries are rather
+ wiser in some points, and have led less restricted lives than I have
+ in others. And if it had not been for my 'carpet-work'&mdash;
+</p>
+<p>
+ Well&mdash;and do you know that I have, for the last few years, taken quite
+ to despise book-knowledge and its effect on the mind&mdash;I mean when
+ people <i>live by it</i> as most readers by profession do, ... cloistering
+ their souls under these roofs made with heads, when they might be
+ under the sky. Such people grow dark and narrow and low, with all
+ their pains.
+</p>
+<p>
+ <i>Friday.</i>&mdash;I was writing you see before you came&mdash;and now I go on in
+ haste to speak 'off my mind' some things which are on it. First ... of
+ yourself; how can it be that you are unwell again, ... and that you
+ should talk (now did you not?&mdash;did I not hear you say so?) of being
+ 'weary in your soul' ... <i>you</i>? What should make <i>you</i>, dearest
+ friend, weary in your soul; or out of spirits in any way?&mdash;Do ... tell
+ me.... I was going to write without a pause&mdash;and almost I might,
+ perhaps, ... even as one of the two hundred of your friends, ...
+ almost I might say out that 'Do tell me.' Or is it (which I am
+ inclined to think most probable) that you are tired of a same life and
+ want change? It may happen to anyone sometimes, and is independent of
+ your will and choice, you know&mdash;and I know, and the whole world knows:
+ and would it not therefore be wise of you, in that case, to fold your
+ life new again and go abroad at once? What can make you weary in your
+ soul, is a problem to me. You are the last from whom I should have
+ expected such a word. And you did say so, I <i>think</i>. I <i>think</i> that it
+ was not a mistake of mine. And <i>you</i>, ... with a full liberty, and the
+ world in your hand for every purpose and pleasure of it!&mdash;Or is it
+ that, being unwell, your spirits are affected by <i>that</i>? But then you
+ might be more unwell than you like to admit&mdash;. And I am teasing you
+ with talking of it ... am I not?&mdash;and being disagreeable is only one
+ third of the way towards being useful, it is good to remember in time.
+</p>
+<p>
+ And then the next thing to write off my mind is ... that you must not,
+ you must not, make an unjust opinion out of what I said to-day. I have
+ been uncomfortable since, lest you should&mdash;and perhaps it would have
+ been better if I had not said it apart from all context in that way;
+ only that you could not long be a friend of mine without knowing and
+ seeing what so lies on the surface. But then, ... as far as I am
+ concerned, ... no one cares less for a 'will' than I do (and this
+ though I never had one, ... in clear opposition to your theory which
+ holds generally nevertheless) for a will in the common things of life.
+ Every now and then there must of course be a crossing and
+ vexation&mdash;but in one's mere pleasures and fantasies, one would rather
+ be crossed and vexed a little than vex a person one loves ... and it
+ is possible to get used to the harness and run easily in it at last;
+ and there is a side-world to hide one's thoughts in, and 'carpet-work'
+ to be immoral on in spite of Mrs. Jameson, ... and the word
+ 'literature' has, with me, covered a good deal of liberty as you must
+ see ... real liberty which is never enquired into&mdash;and it has happened
+ throughout my life by an accident (as far as anything is accident)
+ that my own sense of right and happiness on any important point of
+ overt action, has never run contrariwise to the way of obedience
+ required of me ... while in things not exactly <i>overt</i>, I and all of
+ us are apt to act sometimes up to the limit of our means of acting,
+ with shut doors and windows, and no waiting for cognisance or
+ permission. Ah&mdash;and that last is the worst of it all perhaps! to be
+ forced into concealments from the heart naturally nearest to us; and
+ forced away from the natural source of counsel and strength!&mdash;and
+ then, the disingenuousness&mdash;the cowardice&mdash;the 'vices of
+ slaves'!&mdash;and everyone you see ... all my brothers, ... constrained
+ <i>bodily</i> into submission ... apparent submission at least ... by that
+ worst and most dishonouring of necessities, the necessity of <i>living</i>,
+ everyone of them all, except myself, being dependent in money-matters
+ on the inflexible will ... do you see? But what you do <i>not</i> see, what
+ you <i>cannot</i> see, is the deep tender affection behind and below all
+ those patriarchal ideas of governing grown up children 'in the way
+ they <i>must</i> go!' and there never was (under the strata) a truer
+ affection in a father's heart ... no, nor a worthier heart in itself
+ ... a heart loyaller and purer, and more compelling to gratitude and
+ reverence, than his, as I see it! The evil is in the system&mdash;and he
+ simply takes it to be his duty to rule, and to make happy according to
+ his own views of the propriety of happiness&mdash;he takes it to be his
+ duty to rule like the Kings of Christendom, by divine right. But he
+ loves us through and through it&mdash;and <i>I</i>, for one, love <i>him</i>! and
+ when, five years ago, I lost what I loved best in the world beyond
+ comparison and rivalship ... far better than himself as he knew ...
+ for everyone who knew <i>me</i> could not choose but know what was my first
+ and chiefest affection ... when I lost <i>that</i>, ... I felt that he
+ stood the nearest to me on the closed grave ... or by the unclosing
+ sea ... I do not know which nor could ask. And I will tell you that
+ not only he has been kind and patient and forbearing to me through the
+ tedious trial of this illness (far more trying to standers by than you
+ have an idea of perhaps) but that he was generous and forbearing in
+ that hour of bitter trial, and never reproached me as he might have
+ done and as my own soul has not spared&mdash;never once said to me then or
+ since, that if it had not been for <i>me</i>, the crown of his house would
+ not have fallen. He <i>never did</i> ... and he might have said it, and
+ more&mdash;and I could have answered nothing. Nothing, except that I had
+ paid my own price&mdash;and that the price I paid was greater than his
+ <i>loss</i> ... his!! For see how it was; and how, 'not with my hand but
+ heart,' I was the cause or occasion of that misery&mdash;and though not
+ with the intention of my heart but with its weakness, yet the
+ <i>occasion</i>, any way!
+</p>
+<p>
+ They sent me down you know to Torquay&mdash;Dr. Chambers saying that I
+ could not live a winter in London. The worst&mdash;what people call the
+ worst&mdash;was apprehended for me at that time. So I was sent down with my
+ sister to my aunt there&mdash;and he, my brother whom I loved so, was sent
+ too, to take us there and return. And when the time came for him to
+ leave me, <i>I</i>, to whom he was the dearest of friends and brothers in
+ one ... the only one of my family who ... well, but I cannot write of
+ these things; and it is enough to tell you that he was above us all,
+ better than us all, and kindest and noblest and dearest to <i>me</i>,
+ beyond comparison, any comparison, as I said&mdash;and when the time came
+ for him to leave me <i>I</i>, weakened by illness, could not master my
+ spirits or drive back my tears&mdash;and my aunt kissed them away instead
+ of reproving me as she should have done; and said that <i>she</i> would
+ take care that I should not be grieved ... <i>she</i>! ... and so she sate
+ down and wrote a letter to Papa to tell him that he would 'break my
+ heart' if he persisted in calling away my brother&mdash;As if hearts were
+ broken <i>so</i>! I have thought bitterly since that my heart did not break
+ for a good deal more than <i>that</i>! And Papa's answer was&mdash;burnt into
+ me, as with fire, it is&mdash;that 'under such circumstances he did not
+ refuse to suspend his purpose, but that he considered it to be <i>very
+ wrong in me to exact such a thing</i>.' So there was no separation
+ <i>then</i>: and month after month passed&mdash;and sometimes I was better and
+ sometimes worse&mdash;and the medical men continued to say that they would
+ not answer for my life ... they! if I were agitated&mdash;and so there was
+ no more talk of a separation. And once <i>he</i> held my hand, ... how I
+ remember! and said that he 'loved me better than them all and that he
+ <i>would not</i> leave me ... till I was well,' he said! how I remember
+ <i>that</i>! And ten days from that day the boat had left the shore which
+ never returned; never&mdash;and he <i>had</i> left me! gone! For three days we
+ waited&mdash;and I hoped while I could&mdash;oh&mdash;that awful agony of three days!
+ And the sun shone as it shines to-day, and there was no more wind than
+ now; and the sea under the windows was like this paper for
+ smoothness&mdash;and my sisters drew the curtains back that I might see for
+ myself how smooth the sea was, and how it could hurt nobody&mdash;and other
+ boats came back one by one.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Remember how you wrote in your 'Gismond'
+</p>
+<blockquote>
+ <blockquote>
+ <blockquote>
+ <blockquote>
+ <blockquote>
+ <blockquote>
+ <blockquote>
+<p style="text-indent: 0em">What says the body when they spring<br>
+Some monstrous torture-engine's whole<br>
+Strength on it? No more says the soul,
+</p>
+ </blockquote>
+ </blockquote>
+ </blockquote>
+ </blockquote>
+ </blockquote>
+ </blockquote>
+</blockquote>
+<p style="text-indent: 0em">
+ and you never wrote anything which <i>lived</i> with me more than <i>that</i>.
+ It is such a dreadful truth. But you knew it for truth, I hope, by
+ your genius, and not by such proof as mine&mdash;I, who could not speak or
+ shed a tear, but lay for weeks and months half conscious, half
+ unconscious, with a wandering mind, and too near to God under the
+ crushing of His hand, to pray at all. I expiated all my weak tears
+ before, by not being able to shed then one tear&mdash;and yet they were
+ forbearing&mdash;and no voice said 'You have done this.'
+</p>
+<p>
+ Do not notice what I have written to you, my dearest friend. I have
+ never said so much to a living being&mdash;I never <i>could</i> speak or write
+ of it. I asked no question from the moment when my last hope went: and
+ since then, it has been impossible for me to speak what was in me. I
+ have borne to do it to-day and to you, but perhaps if you were to
+ write&mdash;so do not let this be noticed between us again&mdash;<i>do not</i>! And
+ besides there is no need! I do not reproach myself with such acrid
+ thoughts as I had once&mdash;I <i>know</i> that I would have died ten times over
+ for <i>him</i>, and that therefore though it was wrong of me to be weak,
+ and I have suffered for it and shall learn by it I hope; <i>remorse</i> is
+ not precisely the word for me&mdash;not at least in its full sense. Still
+ you will comprehend from what I have told you how the spring of life
+ must have seemed to break within me <i>then</i>; and how natural it has
+ been for me to loathe the living on&mdash;and to lose faith (even without
+ the loathing), to lose faith in myself ... which I have done on some
+ points utterly. It is not from the cause of illness&mdash;no. And you will
+ comprehend too that I have strong reasons for being grateful to the
+ forbearance.... It would have been <i>cruel</i>, you think, to reproach me.
+ Perhaps so! yet the kindness and patience of the desisting from
+ reproach, are positive things all the same.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Shall I be too late for the post, I wonder? Wilson tells me that you
+ were followed up-stairs yesterday (I write on Saturday this latter
+ part) by somebody whom you probably took for my father. Which is
+ Wilson's idea&mdash;and I hope not yours. No&mdash;it was neither father nor
+ other relative of mine, but an old friend in rather an ill temper.
+</p>
+<p>
+ And so good-bye until Tuesday. Perhaps I shall ... not ... hear from
+ you to-night. Don't let the tragedy or aught else do you harm&mdash;will
+ you? and try not to be 'weary in your soul' any more&mdash;and forgive me
+ this gloomy letter I half shrink from sending you, yet will send.
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">May God bless you.</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">E.B.B.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3>
+ <i>R.B. to E.B.B.</i>
+</h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Wednesday Morning,<br>
+[Post-mark, August 27, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ On the subject of your letter&mdash;quite irrespective of the injunction in
+ it&mdash;I would not have dared speak; now, at least. But I may permit
+ myself, perhaps, to say I am <i>most</i> grateful, <i>most grateful</i>, dearest
+ friend, for this admission to participate, in my degree, in these
+ feelings. There is a better thing than being happy in your happiness;
+ I feel, now that you teach me, it is so. I will write no more now;
+ though that sentence of 'what you are <i>expecting</i>,&mdash;that I shall be
+ tired of you &amp;c.,'&mdash;though I <i>could</i> blot that out of your mind for
+ ever by a very few words <i>now</i>,&mdash;for you <i>would believe</i> me at this
+ moment, close on the other subject:&mdash;but I will take no such
+ advantage&mdash;I will wait.
+</p>
+<p>
+ I have many things (indifferent things, after those) to say; will you
+ write, if but a few lines, to change the associations for that
+ purpose? Then I will write too.&mdash;
+</p>
+<p>
+ May God bless you,&mdash;in what is past and to come! I pray that from my
+ heart, being yours
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">R.B.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3>
+ <i>E.B.B. to R.B.</i>
+</h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Wednesday Morning,<br>
+[Post-mark, August 27, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ But your 'Saul' is unobjectionable as far as I can see, my dear
+ friend. He was tormented by an evil spirit&mdash;but how, we are not told
+ ... and the consolation is not obliged to be definite, ... is it? A
+ singer was sent for as a singer&mdash;and all that you are called upon to
+ be true to, are the general characteristics of David the chosen,
+ standing between his sheep and his dawning hereafter, between
+ innocence and holiness, and with what you speak of as the 'gracious
+ gold locks' besides the chrism of the prophet, on his own head&mdash;and
+ surely you have been happy in the tone and spirit of these lyrics ...
+ broken as you have left them. Where is the wrong in all this? For the
+ right and beauty, they are more obvious&mdash;and I cannot tell you how the
+ poem holds me and will not let me go until it blesses me ... and so,
+ where are the 'sixty lines' thrown away? I do beseech you ... you who
+ forget nothing, ... to remember them directly, and to go on with the
+ rest ... <i>as</i> directly (be it understood) as is not injurious to your
+ health. The whole conception of the poem, I like ... and the execution
+ is exquisite up to this point&mdash;and the sight of Saul in the tent, just
+ struck out of the dark by that sunbeam, 'a thing to see,' ... not to
+ say that afterwards when he is visibly 'caught in his fangs' like the
+ king serpent, ... the sight is grander still. How could you doubt
+ about this poem....
+</p>
+<p>
+ At the moment of writing which, I receive your note. Do <i>you</i> receive
+ my assurances from the deepest of my heart that I never did otherwise
+ than <i>'believe' you</i> ... never did nor shall do ... and that you
+ completely misinterpreted my words if you drew another meaning from
+ them. Believe <i>me</i> in this&mdash;will you? I could not believe <i>you</i> any
+ more for anything you could say, now or hereafter&mdash;and so do not
+ avenge yourself on my unwary sentences by remembering them against me
+ for evil. I did not mean to vex you ... still less to suspect
+ you&mdash;indeed I did not! and moreover it was quite your fault that I did
+ not blot it out after it was written, whatever the meaning was. So you
+ forgive me (altogether) for your own sins: you must:&mdash;
+</p>
+<p>
+ For my part, though I have been sorry since to have written you such a
+ gloomy letter, the sorrow unmakes itself in hearing you speak so
+ kindly. Your sympathy is precious to me, I may say. May God bless you.
+ Write and tell me among the 'indifferent things' something not
+ indifferent, how you are yourself, I mean ... for I fear you are not
+ well and thought you were not looking so yesterday.
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">Dearest friend, I remain yours,</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">E.B.B.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3>
+ <i>E.B.B. to R.B.</i>
+</h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Friday Evening.<br>
+[Post-mark, August 30, 1845].
+</p>
+<p>
+ I do not hear; and come to you to ask the alms of just one line,
+ having taken it into my head that something is the matter. It is not
+ so much exactingness on my part, as that you spoke of meaning to write
+ as soon as you received a note of mine ... which went to you five
+ minutes afterwards ... which is three days ago, or will be when you
+ read this. Are you not well&mdash;or what? Though I have tried and <i>wished</i>
+ to remember having written in the last note something very or even a
+ little offensive to you, I failed in it and go back to the worse fear.
+ For you could not be vexed with me for talking of what was 'your
+ fault' ... 'your own fault,' viz. in having to read sentences which,
+ but for your commands, would have been blotted out. You could not very
+ well take <i>that</i> for serious blame! from <i>me</i> too, who have so much
+ reason and provocation for blaming the archangel Gabriel.&mdash;No&mdash;you
+ could not misinterpret so,&mdash;and if you could not, and if you are not
+ displeased with me, you must be unwell, I think. I took for granted
+ yesterday that you had gone out as before&mdash;but to-night it is
+ different&mdash;and so I come to ask you to be kind enough to write one
+ word for me by some post to-morrow. Now remember ... I am not asking
+ for a letter&mdash;but for a <i>word</i> ... or line strictly speaking.
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">Ever yours, dear friend,</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">E.B.B.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3>
+ <i>R.B. to E.B.B.</i>
+</h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">[Post-mark, August 30, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ This sweet Autumn Evening, Friday, comes all golden into the room and
+ makes me write to you&mdash;not think of you&mdash;yet what shall I write?
+</p>
+<p>
+ It must be for another time ... after Monday, when I am to see you,
+ you know, and hear if the headache be gone, since your note would not
+ round to the perfection of kindness and comfort, and tell me so.
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">God bless my dearest friend.</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">R.B.
+</p>
+<p>
+ I am much better&mdash;well, indeed&mdash;thank you.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3>
+ <i>R.B. to E.B.B.</i>
+</h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">[Post-mark, August 30, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ Can you understand me <i>so</i>, dearest friend, after all? Do you see
+ me&mdash;when I am away, or with you&mdash;'taking offence' at words, 'being
+ vexed' at words, or deeds of yours, even if I could not immediately
+ trace them to their source of entire, pure kindness; as I have
+ hitherto done in every smallest instance?
+</p>
+<p>
+ I believe in <i>you</i> absolutely, utterly&mdash;I believe that when you bade
+ me, that time, be silent&mdash;that such was your bidding, and I was
+ silent&mdash;dare I say I think you did not know at that time the power I
+ have over myself, that I could sit and speak and listen as I have done
+ since? Let me say now&mdash;<i>this only once</i>&mdash;that I loved you from my
+ soul, and gave you my life, so much of it as you would take,&mdash;and all
+ that is <i>done</i>, not to be altered now: it was, in the nature of the
+ proceeding, wholly independent of any return on your part. I will not
+ think on extremes you might have resorted to; as it is, the assurance
+ of your friendship, the intimacy to which you admit me, <i>now</i>, make
+ the truest, deepest joy of my life&mdash;a joy I can never think fugitive
+ while we are in life, because I <SPAN class="sc-ex">know</span>, as to me, I <i>could</i> not
+ willingly displease you,&mdash;while, as to you, your goodness and
+ understanding will always see to the bottom of involuntary or ignorant
+ faults&mdash;always help me to correct them. I have done now. If I thought
+ you were like other women I have known, I should say so
+ much!&mdash;but&mdash;(my first and last word&mdash;I <i>believe</i> in you!)&mdash;what you
+ could and would give me, of your affection, you would give nobly and
+ simply and as a giver&mdash;you would not need that I tell you&mdash;(<i>tell</i>
+ you!)&mdash;what would be supreme happiness to me in the event&mdash;however
+ distant&mdash;
+</p>
+<p>
+ I repeat ... I call on your justice to remember, on your intelligence
+ to believe ... that this is merely a more precise stating the <i>first</i>
+ subject; to put an end to any possible misunderstanding&mdash;to prevent
+ your henceforth believing that because I <i>do not write</i>, from thinking
+ too deeply of you, I am offended, vexed &amp;c. &amp;c. I will never recur to
+ this, nor shall you see the least difference in my manner next Monday:
+ it is indeed, always before me ... how I know nothing of you and
+ yours. But I think I ought to have spoken when I did&mdash;and to speak
+ clearly ... or more clearly what I do, as it is my pride and duty to
+ fall back, now, on the feeling with which I have been in the
+ meantime&mdash;Yours&mdash;God bless you&mdash;
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">R.B.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Let me write a few words to lead into Monday&mdash;and say, you have
+ probably received my note. I am much better&mdash;with a little headache,
+ which is all, and fast going this morning. Of yours you say nothing&mdash;I
+ trust you see your ... dare I say your <i>duty</i> in the Pisa affair, as
+ all else <i>must</i> see it&mdash;shall I hear on Monday? And my 'Saul' that you
+ are so lenient to.
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">Bless you ever&mdash;
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3>
+ <i>E.B.B. to R.B.</i>
+</h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Sunday.<br>
+[August 31, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ I did not think you were angry&mdash;I never said so. But you might
+ reasonably have been wounded a little, if you had suspected me of
+ blaming you for any bearing of yours towards myself; and this was the
+ amount of my fear&mdash;or rather hope ... since I conjectured most that
+ you were not well. And after all you did think ... do think ... that
+ in some way or for some moment I blamed you, disbelieved you,
+ distrusted you&mdash;or why this letter? How have I provoked this letter?
+ Can I forgive myself for having even seemed to have provoked it? and
+ will you believe me that if for the past's sake you sent it, it was
+ unnecessary, and if for the future's, irrelevant? Which I say from no
+ want of sensibility to the words of it&mdash;your words always make
+ themselves felt&mdash;but in fulness of purpose not to suffer you to hold
+ to words because they have been said, nor to say them as if to be
+ holden by them. Why, if a thousand more such words were said by you to
+ me, how could they operate upon the future or present, supposing me to
+ choose to keep the possible modification of your feelings, as a
+ probability, in my sight and yours? Can you help my sitting with the
+ doors all open if I think it right? I do attest to you&mdash;while I trust
+ you, as you must see, in word and act, and while I am confident that
+ no human being ever stood higher or purer in the eyes of another, than
+ you do in mine,&mdash;that you would still stand high and remain
+ unalterably my friend, if the probability in question became a fact,
+ as now at this moment. And this I must say, since you have said other
+ things: and this alone, which <i>I</i> have said, concerns the future, I
+ remind you earnestly.
+</p>
+<p>
+ My dearest friend&mdash;you have followed the most <i>generous</i> of impulses
+ in your whole bearing to me&mdash;and I have recognised and called by its
+ name, in my heart, each one of them. Yet I cannot help adding that, of
+ us two, yours has not been quite the hardest part ... I mean, to a
+ generous nature like your own, to which every sort of nobleness comes
+ easily. Mine has been more difficult&mdash;and I have sunk under it again
+ and again: and the sinking and the effort to recover the duty of a
+ lost position, may have given me an appearance of vacillation and
+ lightness, unworthy at least of <i>you</i>, and perhaps of both of us.
+ Notwithstanding which appearance, it was right and just (only just) of
+ you, to believe in me&mdash;in my truth&mdash;because I have never failed to you
+ in it, nor been capable of <i>such</i> failure: the thing I have said, I
+ have meant ... always: and in things I have not said, the silence has
+ had a reason somewhere different perhaps from where you looked for it.
+ And this brings me to complaining that you, who profess to believe in
+ me, do yet obviously believe that it was only merely silence, which I
+ required of you on one occasion&mdash;and that if I had 'known your power
+ over yourself,' I should not have minded ... no! In other words you
+ believe of me that I was thinking just of my own (what shall I call it
+ for a motive base and small enough?) my own scrupulousness ... freedom
+ from embarrassment! of myself in the least of me; in the tying of my
+ shoestrings, say!&mdash;so much and no more! Now this is so wrong, as to
+ make me impatient sometimes in feeling it to be your impression: I
+ asked for silence&mdash;but <i>also</i> and chiefly for the putting away of ...
+ you know very well what I asked for. And this was sincerely done, I
+ attest to you. You wrote once to me ... oh, long before May and the
+ day we met: that you 'had been so happy, you should be now justified
+ to yourself in taking any step most hazardous to the happiness of your
+ life'&mdash;but if you were justified, could <i>I</i> be therefore justified in
+ abetting such a step,&mdash;the step of wasting, in a sense, your best
+ feelings ... of emptying your water gourds into the sand? What I
+ thought then I think now&mdash;just what any third person, knowing you,
+ would think, I think and feel. I thought too, at first, that the
+ feeling on your part was a mere generous impulse, likely to expand
+ itself in a week perhaps. It affects me and has affected me, very
+ deeply, more than I dare attempt to say, that you should persist
+ <i>so</i>&mdash;and if sometimes I have felt, by a sort of instinct, that after
+ all you would not go on to persist, and that (being a man, you know)
+ you might mistake, a little unconsciously, the strength of your own
+ feeling; you ought not to be surprised; when I felt it was more
+ advantageous and happier for you that it should be so. <i>In any case</i>,
+ I shall never regret my own share in the events of this summer, and
+ your friendship will be dear to me to the last. You know I told you
+ so&mdash;not long since. And as to what you say otherwise, you are right in
+ thinking that I would not hold by unworthy motives in avoiding to
+ speak what you had any claim to hear. But what could I speak that
+ would not be unjust to you? Your life! if you gave it to me and I put
+ my whole heart into it; what should I put but anxiety, and more
+ sadness than you were born to? What could I give you, which it would
+ not be ungenerous to give? Therefore we must leave this subject&mdash;and I
+ must trust you to leave it without one word more; (too many have been
+ said already&mdash;but I could not let your letter pass quite silently ...
+ as if I had nothing to do but to receive all as matter of course
+ <i>so</i>!) while you may well trust <i>me</i> to remember to my life's end, as
+ the grateful remember; and to feel, as those do who have felt sorrow
+ (for where these pits are dug, the water will stand), the full price
+ of your regard. May God bless you, my dearest friend. I shall send
+ this letter after I have seen you, and hope you may not have expected
+ to hear sooner.
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">Ever yours,&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">E.B.B.
+</p>
+<p>
+ <i>Monday, 6 p.m.</i>&mdash;I send in <i>dis</i>obedience to your commands, Mrs.
+ Shelley's book&mdash;but when books accumulate and when besides, I want to
+ let you have the American edition of my poems ... famous for all
+ manner of blunders, you know; what is to be done but have recourse to
+ the parcel-medium? You were in jest about being at Pisa <i>before or as
+ soon as we were</i>?&mdash;oh no&mdash;that must not be indeed&mdash;we must wait a
+ little!&mdash;even if you determine to go at all, which is a question of
+ doubtful expediency. Do take more exercise, this week, and make war
+ against those dreadful sensations in the head&mdash;now, will you?
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3>
+ <i>R.B. to E.B.B.</i>
+</h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Tuesday Evening.<br>
+[Post-mark, September 3, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ I rather hoped ... with no right at all ... to hear from you this
+ morning or afternoon&mdash;to know how you are&mdash;that, 'how are you,' there
+ is no use disguising, is,&mdash;vary it how one may&mdash;my own life's
+ question.&mdash;
+</p>
+<p>
+ I had better write no more, now. Will you not tell me something about
+ you&mdash;the head; and that too, <i>too</i> warm hand ... or was it my fancy?
+ Surely the report of Dr. Chambers is most satisfactory,&mdash;all seems to
+ rest with yourself: you know, in justice to me, you <i>do</i> know that <i>I</i>
+ know the all but mockery, the absurdity of anyone's counsel 'to be
+ composed,' &amp;c. &amp;c. But try, dearest friend!
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">God bless you&mdash;</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">I am yours</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">R.B.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3>
+ <i>R.B. to E.B.B.</i>
+</h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Tuesday Night.<br>
+[Post-mark, September 3, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ Before you leave London, I will answer your letter&mdash;all my attempts
+ end in nothing now&mdash;
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">Dearest friend&mdash;I am yours ever</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">R.B.
+</p>
+<p>
+ But meantime, you will tell me about yourself, will you not? The
+ parcel came a few minutes after my note left&mdash;Well, I can thank you
+ for <i>that</i>; for the Poems,&mdash;though I cannot wear them round my
+ neck&mdash;and for the too great trouble. My heart's friend! Bless you&mdash;
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3>
+ <i>E.B.B. to R.B.</i>
+</h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">[Post-mark, September 4, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ Indeed my headaches are not worth enquiring about&mdash;I mean, they are
+ not of the slightest consequence, and seldom survive the remedy of a
+ cup of coffee. I only wish it were the same with everybody&mdash;I mean,
+ with every <i>head</i>! Also there is nothing the matter otherwise&mdash;and I
+ am going to prove my right to a 'clean bill of health' by going into
+ the park in ten minutes. Twice round the inner enclosure is what I can
+ compass now&mdash;which is equal to once round the world&mdash;is it not?
+</p>
+<p>
+ I had just time to be afraid that the parcel had not reached you. The
+ reason why I sent you the poems was that I had a few copies to give to
+ my personal friends, and so, wished you to have one; and it was quite
+ to please myself and not to please <i>you</i> that I made you have it; and
+ if you put it into the 'plum-tree' to hide the errata, I shall be
+ pleased still, if not rather more. Only let me remember to tell you
+ this time in relation to those books and the question asked of
+ yourself by your noble Romans, that just as I was enclosing my
+ sixty-pounds debt to Mr. Moxon, I did actually and miraculously
+ receive a remittance of fourteen pounds from the selfsame bookseller
+ of New York who agreed last year to print my poems at his own risk and
+ give me 'ten per cent on the profit.' Not that I ever asked for such a
+ thing! They were the terms offered. And I always considered the 'per
+ centage' as quite visionary ... put in for the sake of effect, to make
+ the agreement look better! But no&mdash;you see! One's poetry has a real
+ 'commercial value,' if you do but take it far away enough from the
+ 'civilization of Europe.' When you get near the backwoods and the red
+ Indians, it turns out to be nearly as good for something as
+ 'cabbages,' after all! Do you remember what you said to me of cabbages
+ <i>versus</i> poems, in one of the first letters you ever wrote to me?&mdash;of
+ selling cabbages and buying <i>Punches</i>?
+</p>
+<p>
+ People complain of Dr. Chambers and call him rough and
+ unfeeling&mdash;neither of which <i>I</i> ever found him for a moment&mdash;and I
+ like him for his truthfulness, which is the nature of the man, though
+ it is essential to medical morality never to let a patient think
+ himself mortal while it is possible to prevent it, and even Dr.
+ Chambers may incline to this on occasion. Still he need not have said
+ all the good he said to me on Saturday&mdash;he <i>used</i> not to say any of
+ it; and he must have thought some of it: and, any way, the Pisa-case
+ is strengthened all round by his opinion and injunction, so that all
+ my horror and terror at the thoughts of his visit, (and it's really
+ true that I would rather <i>suffer</i> to a certain extent than be <i>cured</i>
+ by means of those doctors!) had some compensation. How are you? do not
+ forget to say! I found among some papers to-day, a note of yours which
+ I asked Mr. Kenyon to give me for an autograph, two years ago.
+</p>
+<p>
+ May God bless you, dearest friend. And I have a dispensation from
+ 'beef and porter' <span title="eis tous aiônas">&epsilon;&iota;&sigmaf; &tau;&omicron;&upsilon;&sigmaf; &alpha;&iota;&omega;&nu;&alpha;&sigmaf;</span>. 'On no account' was the
+ answer!
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3>
+ <i>R.B. to E.B.B.</i>
+</h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Friday Afternoon.<br>
+[Post-mark, September 5, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ What you tell me of Dr. Chambers, 'all the good of you' he said, and
+ all I venture to infer; this makes me most happy and thankful. Do you
+ use to attach our old <span title="tuphlas elpidas">&tau;&upsilon;&phi;&lambda;&alpha;&sigmaf;
+
+&epsilon;&lambda;&pi;&iota;&delta;&alpha;&sigmaf;</span> (and the practice of
+ instilling them) to that medical science in which Prometheus boasted
+ himself proficient? I had thought the 'faculty' dealt in fears, on the
+ contrary, and scared you into obedience: but I know most about the
+ doctors in Molière. However the joyous truth is&mdash;must be, that you are
+ better, and if one could transport you quietly to Pisa, save you all
+ worry,&mdash;what might one not expect!
+</p>
+<p>
+ When I know your own intentions&mdash;measures, I should say, respecting
+ your journey&mdash;mine will of course be submitted to you&mdash;it will just be
+ 'which day next&mdash;month'?&mdash;Not week, alas.
+</p>
+<p>
+ I can thank you now for this edition of your poems&mdash;I have not yet
+ taken to read it, though&mdash;for it does not, each volume of it, open
+ obediently to a thought, here, and here, and here, like my green books
+ ... no, my Sister's they are; so these you give me are really mine.
+ And America, with its ten per cent., shall have my better word
+ henceforth and for ever ... for when you calculate, there must have
+ been a really extraordinary circulation; and in a few months: it is
+ what newspapers call 'a great fact.' Have they reprinted the
+ 'Seraphim'? Quietly, perhaps!
+</p>
+<p>
+ I shall see you on Monday, then&mdash;
+</p>
+<p>
+ And my all-important headaches are tolerably kept under&mdash;headaches
+ proper they are not&mdash;but the noise and slight turning are less
+ troublesome&mdash;will soon go altogether.
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">Bless you ever&mdash;ever dearest friend.</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">R.B.
+</p>
+<p>
+ <i>Oh, oh, oh!</i> As many thanks for that precious card-box and jewel of
+ a flower-holder as are consistent with my dismay at finding you <i>only</i>
+ return <i>them</i> ... and not the costly brown paper wrappages also ... to
+ say nothing of the inestimable pins with which my sister uses to
+ fasten the same!
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3>
+ <i>E.B.B. to R.B.</i>
+</h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Saturday.<br>
+[Post-mark, September 8, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ I am in the greatest difficulty about the steamers. Will you think a
+ little for me and tell me what is best to do? It appears that the
+ direct Leghorn steamer will not sail on the third, and may not until
+ the middle of October, and if forced to still further delay, which is
+ possible, will not at all. One of my brothers has been to Mr. Andrews
+ of St. Mary Axe and heard as much as this. What shall I do? The middle
+ of October, say my sisters ... and I half fear that it may prove so
+ ... is too late for me&mdash;to say nothing for the uncertainty which
+ completes the difficulty.
+</p>
+<p>
+ On the 20th of September (on the other hand) sails the Malta vessel;
+ and I hear that I may go in it to Gibraltar and find a French steamer
+ there to proceed by. Is there an objection to this&mdash;except the change
+ of steamers ... repeated ... for I must get down to Southampton&mdash;and
+ the leaving England so soon? Is any better to be done? Do think for me
+ a little. And now that the doing comes so near ... and in this dead
+ silence of Papa's ... it all seems impossible, ... and I seem to see
+ the stars <i>constellating</i> against me, and give it as my serious
+ opinion to you that I shall not go. Now, mark.
+</p>
+<p>
+ But I have had the kindest of letters from dear Mr. Kenyon, urging
+ it&mdash;.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Well&mdash;I have no time for writing any more&mdash;and this is only a note of
+ business to bespeak your thoughts about the steamers. My wisdom looks
+ back regretfully ... only rather too late ... on the Leghorn vessel
+ of the third of September. It would have been wise if I had gone
+ <i>then</i>.
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">May God bless you, dearest friend.</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">E.B.B.
+</p>
+<p>
+ But if your head turns still, ... <i>do</i> you walk enough? Is there not
+ fault in your not walking, by your own confession? Think of this
+ first&mdash;and then, if you please, of the steamers.
+</p>
+<p>
+ So, till Monday!&mdash;
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3>
+ <i>E.B.B. to R.B.</i>
+</h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Tuesday.<br>
+[Post-mark, September 9, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ One reason against printing the tragedies now, is your not being well
+ enough for the necessary work connected with them, ... a sure reason
+ and strong ... nay, chiefest of all. Plainly you are unfit for work
+ now&mdash;and even to complete the preparation of the lyrics, and take them
+ through the press, may be too much for you, I am afraid; and if so,
+ why you will not do it&mdash;will you?&mdash;you will wait for another year,&mdash;or
+ at least be satisfied for this, with bringing out a number of the old
+ size, consisting of such poems as are fairly finished and require no
+ retouching. 'Saul' for instance, you might leave&mdash;! You will not let
+ me hear when I am gone, of your being ill&mdash;you will take care ... will
+ you not? Because you see ... or rather <i>I</i> see ... you are <i>not</i>
+ looking well at all&mdash;no, you are not! and even if you do not care for
+ that, you should and must care to consider how unavailing it will be
+ for you to hold those golden keys of the future with a more resolute
+ hand than your contemporaries, should you suffer yourself to be struck
+ down before the gate ... should you lose the physical power while
+ keeping the heart and will. Heart and will are great things, and
+ sufficient things in your case&mdash;but after all we carry a barrow-full
+ of clay about with us, and we must carry it a little carefully if we
+ mean to keep to the path and not run zigzag into the border of the
+ garden. A figure which reminds me ... and I wanted no figure to remind
+ me ... to ask you to thank your sister for me and from me for all her
+ kindness about the flowers. Now you will not forget? you must not.
+ When I think of the repeated trouble she has taken week after week,
+ and all for a stranger, I must think again that it has been very
+ kind&mdash;and I take the liberty of saying so moreover ... <i>as I am not
+ thanking you</i>. Also these flowers of yesterday, which yesterday you
+ disdained so, look full of summer and are full of fragrance, and when
+ they seem to say that it is not September, I am willing to be lied to
+ just <i>so</i>. For I wish it were not September. I wish it were July ...
+ or November ... two months before or after: and that this journey were
+ thrown behind or in front ... anywhere to be out of sight. You do not
+ know the courage it requires to hold the intention of it fast through
+ what I feel sometimes. If it (the courage) had been prophesied to me
+ only a year ago, the prophet would have been laughed to scorn.
+ Well!&mdash;but I want you to see. George's letter, and how he and Mrs.
+ Hedley, when she saw Papa's note of consent to me, give unhesitating
+ counsel. Burn it when you have read it. It is addressed to me ...
+ which you will doubt from the address of it perhaps ... seeing that it
+ goes <span title="ba ... rbarizôn">&beta;&alpha; ... &rho;&beta;&alpha;&rho;&iota;&zeta;&omega;&nu;</span>. We are famous in this house for what
+ are called nick-names ... though a few of us have escaped rather by a
+ caprice than a reason: and I am never called anything else (never at
+ all) except by the nom de <i>paix</i> which you find written in the
+ letter:&mdash;proving as Mr. Kenyon says, that I am just 'half a Ba-by' ...
+ no more nor less;&mdash;and in fact the name has that precise definition.
+ Burn the note when you have read it.
+</p>
+<p>
+ And then I take it into my head, as you do not distinguish my sisters,
+ you say, one from the other, to send you my own account of them in
+ these enclosed 'sonnets' which were written a few weeks ago, and
+ though only pretending to be 'sketches,' pretend to be like, as far as
+ they go, and <i>are</i> like&mdash;my brothers thought&mdash;when I 'showed them
+ against' a profile drawn in pencil by Alfred, on the same subjects. I
+ was laughing and maintaining that mine should be as like as his&mdash;and
+ he yielded the point to me. So it is mere portrait-painting&mdash;and you
+ who are in 'high art,' must not be too scornful. Henrietta is the
+ elder, and the one who brought you into this room first&mdash;and Arabel,
+ who means to go with me to Pisa, has been the most with me through my
+ illness and is the least wanted in the house here, ... and perhaps ...
+ perhaps&mdash;is my favourite&mdash;though my heart smites me while I write that
+ unlawful word. They are both affectionate and kind to me in all
+ things, and good and lovable in their own beings&mdash;very unlike, for the
+ rest; one, most caring for the Polka, ... and the other for the sermon
+ preached at Paddington Chapel, ... <i>that</i> is Arabel ... so if ever you
+ happen to know her you must try not to say before her how 'much you
+ hate &amp;c.' Henrietta always 'managed' everything in the house even
+ before I was ill, ... because she liked it and I didn't, and I waived
+ my right to the sceptre of dinner-ordering.
+</p>
+<p>
+ I have been thinking much of your 'Sordello' since you spoke of
+ it&mdash;and even, I <i>had</i> thought much of it before you spoke of it
+ yesterday; feeling that it might be thrown out into the light by your
+ hand, and greatly justify the additional effort. It is like a noble
+ picture with its face to the wall just now&mdash;or at least, in the
+ shadow. And so worthy as it is of you in all ways! individual all
+ through: you have <i>made</i> even the darkness of it! And such a work as
+ it might become if you chose ... if you put your will to it! What I
+ meant to say yesterday was not that it wanted more additional verses
+ than the 'ten per cent' you spoke of ... though it does perhaps ... so
+ much as that (to my mind) it wants drawing together and fortifying in
+ the connections and associations ... which hang as loosely every here
+ and there, as those in a dream, and confound the reader who persists
+ in thinking himself awake.
+</p>
+<p>
+ How do you mean that I am 'lenient'? Do you not believe that I tell
+ you what I think, and as I think it? I may <i>think wrong</i>, to be
+ sure&mdash;but <i>that</i> is not my fault:&mdash;and so there is no use reproaching
+ me generally, unless you can convict me definitely at the same
+ time:&mdash;is there, now?
+</p>
+<p>
+ And I have been reading and admiring these letters of Mr. Carlyle, and
+ receiving the greatest pleasure from them in every way. He is greatly
+ <i>himself always</i>&mdash;which is the hardest thing for a man to be, perhaps.
+ And what his appreciation of you is, it is easy to see&mdash;and what he
+ expects from you&mdash;notwithstanding that prodigious advice of his, to
+ write your next work in prose! Also Mrs. Carlyle's letter&mdash;thank you
+ for letting me see it. I admire <i>that</i> too! It is as ingenious 'a
+ case' against poor Keats, as could well be drawn&mdash;but nobody who knew
+ very deeply what poetry <i>is</i>, <i>could</i>, you know, draw any case against
+ him. A poet of the senses, he may be and is, just as she says&mdash;but
+ then it is of the senses idealized; and no dream in a 'store-room'
+ would ever be like the 'Eve of St. Agnes,' unless dreamed by some
+ 'animosus infans,' like Keats himself. Still it is all true ... isn't
+ it?... what she observes of the want of thought as thought. He was a
+ <i>seer</i> strictly speaking. And what noble oppositions&mdash;(to go back to
+ Carlyle's letters) ... he writes to the things you were speaking of
+ yesterday! These letters are as good as Milton's picture for
+ convicting and putting to shame. Is not the difference between the men
+ of our day and 'the giants which were on the earth,' less ... far less
+ ... in the faculty ... in the gift, ... or in the general intellect,
+ ... than in the stature of the soul itself? Our inferiority is not in
+ what we can do, but in what we are. We should write poems like Milton
+ if [we] lived them like Milton.
+</p>
+<p>
+ I write all this just to show, I suppose, that I am not industrious as
+ you did me the honour of apprehending that I was going to be ...
+ packing trunks perhaps ... or what else in the way of 'active
+ usefulness.'
+</p>
+<p>
+ Say how you are&mdash;will you? And do take care, and walk and do what is
+ good for you. I shall be able to see you twice before I go. And oh,
+ this going! Pray for me, dearest friend. May God bless you.
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">E.B.B.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3>
+<i>R.B. to E.B.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Thursday Morning.<br>
+[Post-mark, September 11, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ Here are your beautiful, and I am sure <i>true</i> sonnets; they look
+ true&mdash;I remember the light hair, I find. And who paints, and dares
+ exhibit, E.B.B.'s self? And surely 'Alfred's' pencil has not foregone
+ its best privilege, not left <i>the</i> face unsketched? Italians call such
+ an 'effect defective'&mdash;'l'andar a Roma senza vedere il Papa.' He must
+ have begun by seeing his Holiness, I know, and ... <i>he</i> will not trust
+ me with the result, that my sister may copy it for me, because we are
+ strangers, he and I, and I could give him nothing, nothing like the
+ proper price for it&mdash;but <i>you</i> would lend it to me, I think, nor need
+ I do more than thank you in my usual effective and very eloquent
+ way&mdash;for I have already been allowed to visit you seventeen times, do
+ you know; and this last letter of yours, fiftieth is the same! So all
+ my pride is gone, pride in that sense&mdash;and I mean to take of you for
+ ever, and reconcile myself with my lot in this life. Could, and would,
+ you give me such a sketch? It has been on my mind to ask you ever
+ since I knew you if nothing in the way of <i>good</i> portrait existed&mdash;and
+ this occasion bids me speak out, I dare believe: the more, that you
+ have also quieted&mdash;have you not?&mdash;another old obstinate and very
+ likely impertinent questioning of mine&mdash;as to the little name which
+ was neither Orinda, nor Sacharissa (for which thank providence) and is
+ never to appear in books, though you write them. Now I know it and
+ write it&mdash;'Ba'&mdash;and thank you, and your brother George, and only
+ burned his kind letter because you bade me who know best. So, wish by
+ wish, one gets one's wishes&mdash;at least I do&mdash;for one instance, you will
+ go to Italy
+</p>
+<center>
+<img src="images/image01b.png" width="500" height="86"
+alt="Music followed by ? ">
+</center>
+<!--IMAGE END-->
+<p>
+ Why, 'lean and harken after it' as Donne says&mdash;
+</p>
+<p>
+ Don't expect Neapolitan Scenery at Pisa, quite in the North, remember.
+ Mrs. Shelley found Italy for the first time, real Italy, at Sorrento,
+ she says. Oh that book&mdash;does one wake or sleep? The 'Mary dear' with
+ the brown eyes, and Godwin's daughter and Shelley's wife, and who
+ surely was something better once upon a time&mdash;and to go through Rome
+ and Florence and the rest, after what I suppose to be Lady
+ Londonderry's fashion: the intrepidity of the commonplace quite
+ astounds me. And then that way, when she and the like of her are put
+ in a new place, with new flowers, new stones, faces, walls, all
+ new&mdash;of looking wisely up at the sun, clouds, evening star, or
+ mountain top and wisely saying 'who shall describe <i>that</i> sight!'&mdash;Not
+ <i>you</i>, we very well see&mdash;but why don't you tell us that at Rome they
+ eat roasted chestnuts, and put the shells into their aprons, the women
+ do, and calmly empty the whole on the heads of the passengers in the
+ street below; and that at Padua when a man drives his waggon up to a
+ house and stops, all the mouse-coloured oxen that pull it from a beam
+ against their foreheads sit down in a heap and rest. But once she
+ travelled the country with Shelley on arm; now she plods it, Rogers in
+ hand&mdash;to such things and uses may we come at last! Her remarks on art,
+ once she lets go of Rio's skirts, are amazing&mdash;Fra Angelico, for
+ instance, only painted Martyrs, Virgins &amp;c., she had no eyes for the
+ divine <i>bon-bourgeoisie</i> of his pictures; the dear common folk of his
+ crowds, those who sit and listen (spectacle at nose and bent into a
+ comfortable heap to hear better) at the sermon of the Saint&mdash;and the
+ children, and women,&mdash;divinely pure they all are, but fresh from the
+ streets and market place&mdash;but she is wrong every where, that is, not
+ right, not seeing what is to see, speaking what one expects to hear&mdash;I
+ quarrel with her, for ever, I think.
+</p>
+<p>
+ I am much better, and mean to be well as you desire&mdash;shall correct the
+ verses you have seen, and make them do for the present.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Saturday, then! And one other time only, do you say?
+</p>
+<p>
+ God bless you, my own, best friend.
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">Yours ever</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">R.B.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3>
+<i>E.B.B. to R.B.</i>
+</h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Thursday.<br>
+[Post-mark, September 11, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ Will you come on Friday ... to-morrow ... instead of Saturday&mdash;will it
+ be the same thing? Because I have heard from Mr. Kenyon, who is to be
+ in London on Friday evening he says, and therefore may mean to visit
+ me on Saturday I imagine. So let it be Friday&mdash;if you should not, for
+ any reason, prove Monday to be better still.
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">May God bless you&mdash;</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">Ever yours,</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">E.B.B.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3>
+<i>R.B. to E.B.B.</i>
+</h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Saturday Morning.<br>
+[Post-mark, September 13, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ Now, dearest, I will try and write the little I shall be able, in
+ reply to your letter of last week&mdash;and first of all I have to entreat
+ you, now more than ever, to help me and understand from the few words
+ the feelings behind them&mdash;(should <i>speak</i> rather more easily, I
+ think&mdash;but I dare not run the risk: and I know, after all, you will be
+ just and kind where you can.) I have read your letter again and
+ again. I will tell you&mdash;no, not <i>you</i>, but any imaginary other person,
+ who should hear what I am going to avow; I would tell that person most
+ sincerely there is not a particle of fatuity, shall I call it, in that
+ avowal; cannot be, seeing that from the beginning and at this moment I
+ never dreamed of winning your <i>love</i>. I can hardly write this word, so
+ incongruous and impossible does it seem; such a change of our places
+ does it imply&mdash;nor, next to that, though long after, <i>would</i> I, if I
+ <i>could</i>, supplant one of any of the affections that I know to have
+ taken root in you&mdash;<i>that</i> great and solemn one, for instance. I feel
+ that if I could get myself <i>remade</i>, as if turned to gold, I <SPAN class="sc-ex">would</span> not
+ even then desire to become more than the mere setting to <i>that</i>
+ diamond you must always wear. The regard and esteem you now give me,
+ in this letter, and which I press to my heart and bow my head upon, is
+ all I can take and all too embarrassing, using <i>all</i> my gratitude. And
+ yet, with that contented pride in being infinitely your debtor as it
+ is, bound to you for ever as it is; when I read your letter with all
+ the determination to be just to us both; I dare not so far withstand
+ the light I am master of, as to refuse seeing that whatever is
+ recorded as an objection to your disposing of that life of mine I
+ would give you, has reference to some supposed good in that life which
+ your accepting it would destroy (of which fancy I shall speak
+ presently)&mdash;I say, wonder as I may at this, I cannot but find it
+ there, surely there. I could no more 'bind <i>you</i> by words,' than you
+ have bound me, as you say&mdash;but if I misunderstand you, one assurance
+ to that effect will be but too intelligible to me&mdash;but, as it <i>is</i>, I
+ have difficulty in imagining that while one of so many reasons, which
+ I am not obliged to repeat to myself, but which any one easily
+ conceives; while <i>any one</i> of those reasons would impose silence on me
+ <i>for ever</i> (for, as I observed, I love you as you now are, and <i>would</i>
+ not remove one affection that is already part of you,)&mdash;<i>would</i> you,
+ being able to speak <i>so</i>, only say <i>that you</i> desire not to put 'more
+ sadness than I was born to,' into my life?&mdash;that you 'could give me
+ only what it were ungenerous to give'?
+</p>
+<p>
+ Have I your meaning here? In so many words, is it on my account that
+ you bid me 'leave this subject'? I think if it were so, I would for
+ once call my advantages round me. I am not what your generous
+ self-forgetting appreciation would sometimes make me out&mdash;but it is
+ not since yesterday, nor ten nor twenty years before, that I began to
+ look into my own life, and study its end, and requirements, what would
+ turn to its good or its loss&mdash;and I <i>know</i>, if one may know anything,
+ that to make that life yours and increase it by union with yours,
+ would render me <i>supremely happy</i>, as I said, and say, and feel. My
+ whole suit to you is, in that sense, <i>selfish</i>&mdash;not that I am ignorant
+ that <i>your</i> nature would most surely attain happiness in being
+ conscious that it made another happy&mdash;but <i>that best, best end of
+ all</i>, would, like the rest, come from yourself, be a reflection of
+ your own gift.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Dearest, I will end here&mdash;words, persuasion, arguments, if they were
+ at my service I would not use them&mdash;I believe in you, altogether have
+ faith in you&mdash;in you. I will not think of insulting by trying to
+ reassure you on one point which certain phrases in your letter might
+ at first glance seem to imply&mdash;you do not understand me to be living
+ and labouring and writing (and <i>not</i> writing) in order to be
+ successful in the world's sense? I even convinced the people <i>here</i>
+ what was my true 'honourable position in society,' &amp;c. &amp;c. therefore I
+ shall not have to inform <i>you</i> that I desire to be very rich, very
+ great; but not in reading Law gratis with dear foolish old Basil
+ Montagu, as he ever and anon bothers me to do;&mdash;much less&mdash;enough of
+ this nonsense.
+</p>
+<p>
+ 'Tell me what I have a claim to hear': I can hear it, and be as
+ grateful as I was before and am now&mdash;your friendship is my pride and
+ happiness. If you told me your love was bestowed elsewhere, and that
+ it was in my power to serve you <i>there</i>, to serve you there would
+ still be my pride and happiness. I look on and on over the prospect of
+ my love, it is all <i>on</i>wards&mdash;and all possible forms of unkindness ...
+ I quite laugh to think how they are <i>behind</i> ... cannot be encountered
+ in the route we are travelling! I submit to you and will obey you
+ implicitly&mdash;obey what I am able to conceive of your least desire, much
+ more of your expressed wish. But it was necessary to make this avowal,
+ among other reasons, for one which the world would recognize too. My
+ whole scheme of life (with its wants, material wants at least, closely
+ cut down) was long ago calculated&mdash;and it supposed <i>you</i>, the finding
+ such an one as you, utterly impossible&mdash;because in calculating one
+ goes upon <i>chances</i>, not on providence&mdash;how could I expect you? So for
+ my own future way in the world I have always refused to care&mdash;any one
+ who can live a couple of years and more on bread and potatoes as I did
+ once on a time, and who prefers a blouse and a blue shirt (such as I
+ now write in) to all manner of dress and gentlemanly appointment, and
+ who can, if necessary, groom a horse not so badly, or at all events
+ would rather do it all day long than succeed Mr. Fitzroy Kelly in the
+ Solicitor-Generalship,&mdash;such an one need not very much concern himself
+ beyond considering the lilies how they grow. But now I see you near
+ this life, all changes&mdash;and at a word, I will do all that ought to be
+ done, that every one used to say could be done, and let 'all my powers
+ find sweet employ' as Dr. Watts sings, in getting whatever is to be
+ got&mdash;not very much, surely. I would print these things, get them away,
+ and do this now, and go to you at Pisa with the news&mdash;at Pisa where
+ one may live for some £100 a year&mdash;while, lo, I seem to remember, I
+ <i>do</i> remember, that Charles Kean offered to give me 500 of those
+ pounds for any play that might suit him&mdash;to say nothing of Mr. Colburn
+ saying confidentially that he wanted more than his dinner 'a novel on
+ the subject of <i>Napoleon</i>'! So may one make money, if one does not
+ live in a house in a row, and feel impelled to take the Princess's
+ Theatre for a laudable development and exhibition of one's faculty.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Take the sense of all this, I beseech you, dearest&mdash;all you shall say
+ will be best&mdash;I am yours&mdash;
+</p>
+<p>
+ Yes, Yours ever. God bless you for all you have been, and are, and
+ will certainly be to me, come what He shall please!
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">R.B.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3>
+<i>E.B.B. to R.B.</i>
+</h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">[Post-mark, September 16, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ I scarcely know how to write what is to be written nor indeed why it
+ is to be written and to what end. I have tried in vain&mdash;and you are
+ waiting to hear from me. I am unhappy enough even where I am
+ happy&mdash;but ungrateful nowhere&mdash;and I thank you from my
+ heart&mdash;profoundly from the depths of my heart ... which is nearly all
+ I can do.
+</p>
+<p>
+ One letter I began to write and asked in it how it could become me to
+ speak at all if '<i>from the beginning and at this moment you never
+ dreamed of</i>' ... and there, I stopped and tore the paper; because I
+ felt that you were too loyal and generous, for me to bear to take a
+ moment's advantage of the same, and bend down the very flowering
+ branch of your generosity (as it might be) to thicken a little the
+ fence of a woman's caution and reserve. You will not say that you have
+ not acted as if you 'dreamed'&mdash;and I will answer therefore to the
+ general sense of your letter and former letters, and admit at once
+ that I <i>did</i> state to you the difficulties most difficult to myself
+ ... though not all ... and that if I had been worthier of you I should
+ have been proportionably less in haste to 'bid you leave that
+ subject.' I do not understand how you can seem at the same moment to
+ have faith in my integrity and to have doubt whether all this time I
+ may not have felt a preference for another ... which you are ready
+ 'to serve,' you say. Which is generous in you&mdash;but in <i>me</i>, where were
+ the integrity? Could you really hold me to be blameless, and do you
+ think that truehearted women act usually so? Can it be necessary for
+ me to tell you that I could not have acted so, and did not? And shall
+ I shrink from telling you besides ... you, who have been generous to
+ me and have a right to hear it ... and have spoken to me in the name
+ of an affection and memory most precious and holy to me, in this same
+ letter ... that neither now nor formerly has any man been to my
+ feelings what you are ... and that if I were different in some
+ respects and free in others by the providence of God, I would accept
+ the great trust of your happiness, gladly, proudly, and gratefully;
+ and give away my own life and soul to that end. I <i>would</i> do it ...
+ <i>not, I do</i> ... observe! it is a truth without a consequence; only
+ meaning that I am not all stone&mdash;only proving that I am not likely to
+ consent to help you in wrong against yourself. You see in me what is
+ not:&mdash;<i>that</i>, I know: and you overlook in me what is unsuitable to you
+ ... <i>that</i> I know, and have sometimes told you. Still, because a
+ strong feeling from some sources is self-vindicating and ennobling to
+ the object of it, I will not say that, if it were proved to me that
+ you felt this for me, I would persist in putting the sense of my own
+ unworthiness between you and me&mdash;not being heroic, you know, nor
+ pretending to be so. But something worse than even a sense of
+ unworthiness, <i>God</i> has put between us! and judge yourself if to beat
+ your thoughts against the immovable marble of it, can be anything but
+ pain and vexation of spirit, waste and wear of spirit to you ...
+ judge! The present is here to be seen ... speaking for itself! and the
+ best future you can imagine for me, what a precarious thing it must be
+ ... a thing for making burdens out of ... only not for your carrying,
+ as I have vowed to my own soul. As dear Mr. Kenyon said to me to-day
+ in his smiling kindness ... 'In ten years you may be strong
+ perhaps'&mdash;or 'almost strong'! that being the encouragement of my best
+ friends! What would he say, do you think, if he could know or
+ guess...! what <i>could</i> he say but that you were ... a poet!&mdash;and I ...
+ still worse! <i>Never</i> let him know or guess!
+</p>
+<p>
+ And so if you are wise and would be happy (and you have excellent
+ practical sense after all and should exercise it) you must leave
+ me&mdash;these thoughts of me, I mean ... for if we might not be true
+ friends for ever, I should have less courage to say the other truth.
+ But we may be friends always ... and cannot be so separated, that your
+ happiness, in the knowledge of it, will not increase mine. And if you
+ will be persuaded by me, as you say, you will be persuaded <i>thus</i> ...
+ and consent to take a resolution and force your mind at once into
+ another channel. Perhaps I might bring you reasons of the class which
+ you tell me 'would silence you for ever.' I might certainly tell you
+ that my own father, if he knew that you had written to me <i>so</i>, and
+ that I had answered you&mdash;<i>so</i>, even, would not forgive me at the end
+ of ten years&mdash;and this, from none of the causes mentioned by me here
+ and in no disrespect to your name and your position ... though he does
+ not over-value poetry even in his daughter, and is apt to take the
+ world's measures of the means of life ... but for the singular reason
+ that he never <i>does</i> tolerate in his family (sons or daughters) the
+ development of one class of feelings. Such an objection I could not
+ bring to you of my own will&mdash;it rang hollow in my ears&mdash;perhaps I
+ thought even too little of it:&mdash;and I brought to you what I thought
+ much of, and cannot cease to think much of equally. Worldly thoughts,
+ these are not at all, nor have been: there need be no soiling of the
+ heart with any such:&mdash;and I will say, in reply to some words of yours,
+ that you cannot despise the gold and gauds of the world more than I
+ do, and should do even if I found a use for them. And if I <i>wished</i> to
+ be very poor, in the world's sense of poverty, I <i>could not</i>, with
+ three or four hundred a year of which no living will can dispossess
+ me. And is it not the chief good of money, the being free from the
+ need of thinking of it? It seems so to me.
+</p>
+<p>
+ The obstacles then are of another character, and the stronger for
+ being so. Believe that I am grateful to you&mdash;<i>how</i> grateful, cannot be
+ shown in words nor even in tears ... grateful enough to be truthful in
+ all ways. You know I might have hidden myself from you&mdash;but I would
+ not: and by the truth told of myself, you may believe in the
+ earnestness with which I tell the other truths&mdash;of you ... and of this
+ subject. The subject will not bear consideration&mdash;it breaks in our
+ hands. But that God is stronger than we, cannot be a bitter thought to
+ you but a holy thought ... while He lets me, as much as I can be
+ anyone's, be only yours.
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">E.B.B.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3>
+<i>R.B. to E.B.B.</i>
+</h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">[Post-mark, September 17, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ I do not know whether you imagine the precise effect of your letter on
+ me&mdash;very likely you do, and write it just for that&mdash;for I conceive
+ <i>all</i> from your goodness. But before I tell you what is that effect,
+ let me say in as few words as possible what shall stop any
+ fear&mdash;though only for a moment and on the outset&mdash;that you have been
+ misunderstood, that the goodness <i>outside</i>, and round and over all,
+ hides all or any thing. I understand you to signify to me that you
+ see, at this present, insurmountable obstacles to that&mdash;can I speak
+ it&mdash;entire gift, which I shall own, was, while I dared ask it, above
+ my hopes&mdash;and wishes, even, so it seems to me ... and yet could not
+ but be asked, so plainly was it dictated to me, by something quite out
+ of those hopes and wishes. Will it help me to say that once in this
+ Aladdin-cavern I knew I ought to stop for no heaps of jewel-fruit on
+ the trees from the very beginning, but go on to the lamp, <i>the</i> prize,
+ the last and best of all? Well, I understand you to pronounce that at
+ present you believe this gift impossible&mdash;and I acquiesce entirely&mdash;I
+ submit wholly to you; repose on you in all the faith of which I am
+ capable. Those obstacles are solely for <i>you</i> to see and to declare
+ ... had <i>I</i> seen them, be sure I should never have mocked you or
+ myself by affecting to pass them over ... what <i>were</i> obstacles, I
+ mean: but you <i>do</i> see them, I must think,&mdash;and perhaps they strike me
+ the more from my true, honest unfeigned inability to imagine what they
+ are,&mdash;not that I shall endeavour. After what you <i>also</i> apprise me of,
+ I know and am joyfully confident that if ever they cease to be what
+ you now consider them, you who see now <i>for me</i>, whom I implicitly
+ trust in to see for me; you will <i>then</i>, too, see and remember me, and
+ how I trust, and shall then be still trusting. And until you so see,
+ and so inform me, I shall never utter a word&mdash;for that would involve
+ the vilest of implications. I thank God&mdash;I <i>do</i> thank him, that in
+ this whole matter I have been, to the utmost of my power, not unworthy
+ of his introducing you to me, in this respect that, being no longer in
+ the first freshness of life, and having for many years now made up my
+ mind to the impossibility of loving any woman ... having wondered at
+ this in the beginning, and fought not a little against it, having
+ acquiesced in it at last, and accounted for it all to myself, and
+ become, if anything, rather proud of it than sorry ... I say, when
+ real love, making itself at once recognized as such, <i>did</i> reveal
+ itself to me at last, I <i>did</i> open my heart to it with a cry&mdash;nor care
+ for its overturning all my theory&mdash;nor mistrust its effect upon a mind
+ set in ultimate order, so I fancied, for the few years more&mdash;nor
+ apprehend in the least that the new element would harm what was
+ already organized without its help. Nor have I, either, been guilty of
+ the more pardonable folly, of treating the new feeling after the
+ pedantic fashions and instances of the world. I have not spoken when
+ <i>it</i> did not speak, because 'one' might speak, or has spoken, or
+ <i>should</i> speak, and 'plead' and all that miserable work which, after
+ all, I may well continue proud that I am not called to attempt. <i>Here</i>
+ for instance, <i>now</i> ... 'one' should despair; but 'try again' first,
+ and work blindly at removing those obstacles (&mdash;if I saw them, I
+ should be silent, and only speak when a month hence, ten years hence,
+ I could bid you look where they <i>were</i>)&mdash;and 'one' would do all this,
+ not for the <i>play-acting's</i> sake, or to 'look the character' ...
+ (<i>that</i> would be something quite different from folly ...) but from a
+ not unreasonable anxiety lest by too sudden a silence, too complete an
+ acceptance of your will; the earnestness and endurance and
+ unabatedness ... the <i>truth</i>, in fact, of what had already been
+ professed, should get to be questioned&mdash;But I believe that you believe
+ me&mdash;And now that all is clear between us I will say, what you will
+ hear, without fearing for me or yourself, that I am utterly contented
+ ... ('grateful' I have done with ... it must go&mdash;) I accept what you
+ give me, what those words deliver to me, as&mdash;not all I asked for ...
+ as I said ... but as more than I ever hoped for,&mdash;<i>all</i>, in the best
+ sense, that I deserve. That phrase in my letter which you objected to,
+ and the other&mdash;may stand, too&mdash;I never attempted to declare, describe
+ my feeling for you&mdash;one word of course stood for it all ... but having
+ to put down some one <i>point</i>, so to speak, of it&mdash;you could not wonder
+ if I took any extreme one <i>first</i> ... never minding all the untold
+ portion that <i>led</i> up to it, made it possible and natural&mdash;it is true,
+ 'I could not dream of <i>that</i>'&mdash;that I was eager to get the horrible
+ notion away from never so flitting a visit to you, that you were thus
+ and thus to me <i>on condition</i> of my proving just the same to you&mdash;just
+ as if we had waited to acknowledge that the moon lighted us till we
+ ascertained within these two or three hundred years that the earth
+ happens to light the moon as well! But I felt that, and so said
+ it:&mdash;now you have declared what I should never have presumed to
+ hope&mdash;and I repeat to you that I, with all to be thankful for to God,
+ am most of all thankful for this the last of his providences ... which
+ is no doubt, the natural and inevitable feeling, could one always see
+ clearly. Your regard for me is <i>all</i> success&mdash;let the rest come, or
+ not come. In my heart's thankfulness I would ... I am sure I would
+ promise anything that would gratify you ... but it would <i>not</i> do
+ that, to agree, in words, to change my affections, put them elsewhere
+ &amp;c. &amp;c. That would be pure foolish talking, and quite foreign to the
+ practical results which you will attain in a better way from a higher
+ motive. I will cheerfully promise you, however, to be 'bound by no
+ words,' blind to no miracle; in sober earnest, it is not because I
+ renounced once for all oxen and the owning and having to do with them,
+ that I will obstinately turn away from any unicorn when such an
+ apparition blesses me ... but meantime I shall walk at peace on our
+ hills here nor go looking in all corners for the bright curved horn!
+ And as for you ... if I did not dare 'to dream of that'&mdash;, now it is
+ mine, my pride and joy prevent in no manner my taking the whole
+ consolation of it at once, <i>now</i>&mdash;I will be confident that, if I obey
+ you, I shall get no wrong for it&mdash;if, endeavouring to spare you
+ fruitless pain, I do not eternally revert to the subject; do indeed
+ 'quit' it just now, when no good can come of dwelling on it to you;
+ you will never say to yourself&mdash;so I said&mdash;'the "generous impulse"
+ <i>has</i> worn itself out ... time is doing his usual work&mdash;this was to be
+ expected' &amp;c. &amp;c. You will be the first to say to me 'such an obstacle
+ has ceased to exist ... or is now become one palpable to <i>you</i>, one
+ <i>you</i> may try and overcome'&mdash;and I shall be there, and ready&mdash;ten
+ years hence as now&mdash;if alive.
+</p>
+<p>
+ One final word on the other matters&mdash;the 'worldly matters'&mdash;I shall
+ own I alluded to them rather ostentatiously, because&mdash;because <i>that
+ would be</i> the <i>one</i> poor sacrifice I could make you&mdash;one I would
+ cheerfully make, but a sacrifice, and the only one: this careless
+ 'sweet habitude of living'&mdash;this absolute independence of mine, which,
+ if I had it not, my heart would starve and die for, I feel, and which
+ I have fought so many good battles to preserve&mdash;for that has
+ happened, too&mdash;this light rational life I lead, and know so well that
+ I lead; this I could give up for nothing less than&mdash;what you know&mdash;but
+ I <i>would</i> give it up, not for you merely, but for those whose
+ disappointment might re-act on you&mdash;and I should break no promise to
+ myself&mdash;the money getting would not be for the sake of <i>it</i>; 'the
+ labour not for that which is nought'&mdash;indeed the necessity of doing
+ this, if at all, <i>now</i>, was one of the reasons which make me go on to
+ that <i>last request of all</i>&mdash;at once; one must not be too old, they
+ say, to begin their ways. But, in spite of all the babble, I feel sure
+ that whenever I make up my mind to that, I can be rich enough and to
+ spare&mdash;because along with what you have thought <i>genius</i> in me, is
+ certainly talent, what the world recognizes as such; and I have tried
+ it in various ways, just to be sure that I <i>was</i> a little magnanimous
+ in never intending to use it. Thus, in more than one of the reviews
+ and newspapers that laughed my 'Paracelsus' to scorn ten years ago&mdash;in
+ the same column, often, of these reviews, would follow a most
+ laudatory notice of an Elementary French book, on a new plan, which I
+ '<i>did</i>' for my old French master, and he published&mdash;'<i>that</i> was really
+ an useful work'!&mdash;So that when the only obstacle is only that there is
+ so much <i>per annum</i> to be producible, you will tell me. After all it
+ would be unfair in me not to confess that this was always intended to
+ be <i>my</i> own single stipulation&mdash;'an objection' which I could see,
+ certainly,&mdash;but meant to treat myself to the little luxury of
+ removing.
+</p>
+<p>
+ So, now, dearest&mdash;let me once think of that, and of you as my own, my
+ dearest&mdash;this once&mdash;dearest, I have done with words for the present. I
+ will wait. God bless you and reward you&mdash;I kiss your hands <i>now</i>. This
+ is my comfort, that if you accept my feeling as all but <i>un</i>expressed
+ now, more and more will become spoken&mdash;or understood, that is&mdash;we both
+ live on&mdash;you will know better <i>what</i> it was, how much and manifold,
+ what one little word had to give out.
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">God bless you&mdash;</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">Your R.B.
+</p>
+<p>
+ On Thursday,&mdash;you remember?
+</p>
+<p>
+ This is Tuesday Night&mdash;
+</p>
+<p>
+ I called on Saturday at the Office in St. Mary Axe&mdash;all uncertainty
+ about the vessel's sailing again for Leghorn&mdash;it could not sail before
+ the middle of the month&mdash;and only then <i>if</i> &amp;c. But if I would leave
+ my card &amp;c. &amp;c.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3>
+<i>E.B.B. to R.B.</i>
+</h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Wednesday Morning.<br>
+[Post-mark, September 17, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ I write one word just to say that it is all over with Pisa; which was
+ a probable evil when I wrote last, and which I foresaw from the
+ beginning&mdash;being a prophetess, you know. I cannot tell you now how it
+ has all happened&mdash;<i>only do not blame me</i>, for I have kept my ground to
+ the last, and only yield when Mr. Kenyon and all the world see that
+ there is no standing. I am ashamed almost of having put so much
+ earnestness into a personal matter&mdash;and I spoke face to face and quite
+ firmly&mdash;so as to pass with my sisters for the 'bravest person in the
+ house' without contestation.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Sometimes it seems to me as if it <i>could not</i> end so&mdash;I mean, that the
+ responsibility of such a negative must be reconsidered ... and you see
+ how Mr. Kenyon writes to me. Still, as the matter lies, ... no Pisa!
+ And, as I said before, my prophetic instincts are not likely to fail,
+ such as they have been from the beginning.
+</p>
+<p>
+ If you wish to come, it must not be until Saturday at soonest. I have
+ a headache and am weary at heart with all this vexation&mdash;and besides
+ there is no haste now: and when you do come, <i>if you do</i>, I will trust
+ to you not to recur to one subject, which must lie where it fell ...
+ must! I had begun to write to you on Saturday, to say how I had
+ forgotten to give you your MSS. which were lying ready for you ... the
+ <i>Hood</i> poems. Would it not be desirable that you made haste to see
+ them through the press, and went abroad with your Roman friends at
+ once, to try to get rid of that uneasiness in the head? Do think of
+ it&mdash;and more than think.
+</p>
+<p>
+ For me, you are not to fancy me unwell. Only, not to be worn a little
+ with the last week's turmoil, were impossible&mdash;and Mr. Kenyon said to
+ me yesterday that he quite wondered how I could bear it at all, do
+ anything reasonable at all, and confine my misdoings to sending
+ letters addressed to him at Brighton, when he was at Dover! If
+ anything changes, you shall hear from&mdash;
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">E.B.B.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Mr. Kenyon returns to Dover immediately. His kindness is impotent in
+ the case.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3>
+<i>E.B.B. to R.B.</i>
+</h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Wednesday Evening.<br>
+[Post-mark, September 18, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ But one word before we leave the subject, and then to leave it
+ finally; but I cannot let you go on to fancy a mystery anywhere, in
+ obstacles or the rest. You deserve at least a full frankness; and in
+ my letter I meant to be fully frank. I even told you what was an
+ absurdity, so absurd that I should far rather not have told you at
+ all, only that I felt the need of telling you all: and no mystery is
+ involved in that, except as an 'idiosyncrasy' is a mystery. But the
+ 'insurmountable' difficulty is for you and everybody to see; and for
+ me to feel, who have been a very byword among the talkers, for a
+ confirmed invalid through months and years, and who, even if I were
+ going to Pisa and had the best prospects possible to me, should yet
+ remain liable to relapses and stand on precarious ground to the end of
+ my life. Now that is no mystery for the trying of 'faith'; but a plain
+ fact, which neither thinking nor speaking can make less a fact. But
+ <i>don't</i> let us speak of it.
+</p>
+<p>
+ I must speak, however, (before the silence) of what you said and
+ repeat in words for which I gratefully thank you&mdash;and which are <i>not</i>
+ 'ostentatious' though unnecessary words&mdash;for, if I were in a position
+ to accept sacrifices from you, I would not accept <i>such</i> a sacrifice
+ ... amounting to a sacrifice of duty and dignity as well as of ease
+ and satisfaction ... to an exchange of higher work for lower work ...
+ and of the special work you are called to, for that which is work for
+ anybody. I am not so ignorant of the right uses and destinies of what
+ you have and are. You will leave the Solicitor-Generalships to the
+ Fitzroy Kellys, and justify your own nature; and besides, do me the
+ little right, (<i>over</i> the <i>over</i>-right you are always doing me) of
+ believing that I would not bear or dare to do <i>you</i> so much wrong, if
+ I were in the position to do it.
+</p>
+<p>
+ And for all the rest I thank you&mdash;believe that I thank you ... and
+ that the feeling is not so weak as the word. That <i>you</i> should care at
+ all for <i>me</i> has been a matter of unaffected wonder to me from the
+ first hour until now&mdash;and I cannot help the pain I feel sometimes, in
+ thinking that it would have been better for you if you never had known
+ me. May God turn back the evil of me! Certainly I admit that I cannot
+ expect you ... just at this moment, ... to say more than you say, ...
+ and I shall try to be at ease in the consideration that you are as
+ accessible to the 'unicorn' now as you ever could be at any former
+ period of your life. And here I have done. I had done <i>living</i>, I
+ thought, when you came and sought me out! and why? and to what end?
+ <i>That</i>, I cannot help thinking now. Perhaps just that I may pray for
+ you&mdash;which were a sufficient end. If you come on Saturday I trust you
+ to leave this subject untouched,&mdash;as it must be indeed henceforth.
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">I am yours,</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">E.B.B.
+</p>
+<p>
+ No word more of Pisa&mdash;I shall not go, I think.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3>
+<i>R.B. to E.B.B.</i>
+</h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">[Post-mark, September 18, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ Words!&mdash;it was written I should hate and never use them to any
+ purpose. I will not say one word here&mdash;very well knowing neither word
+ nor deed avails&mdash;from me.
+</p>
+<p>
+ My letter will have reassured you on the point you seem undecided
+ about&mdash;whether I would speak &amp;c.
+</p>
+<p>
+ I will come whenever you shall signify that I may ... whenever, acting
+ in my best interests, you feel that it will not hurt you (weary you in
+ any way) to see me&mdash;but I fear that on Saturday I must be
+ otherwhere&mdash;I enclose the letter from my old foe. Which could not but
+ melt me for all my moroseness and I can hardly go and return for my
+ sister in time. Will you tell me?
+</p>
+<p>
+ It is dark&mdash;but I want to save the post&mdash;
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">Ever yours</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">R.B.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3>
+<i>E.B.B. to R.B.</i>
+</h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Wednesday.<br>
+[Post-mark, September 18, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ Of course you cannot do otherwise than go with your sister&mdash;or it will
+ be 'Every man <i>out</i> of his humour' perhaps&mdash;and you are not so very
+ 'savage' after all.
+</p>
+<p>
+ On Monday then, if you do not hear&mdash;to the contrary.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Papa has been walking to and fro in this room, looking thoughtfully
+ and talking leisurely&mdash;and every moment I have expected I confess,
+ some word (that did not come) about Pisa. Mr. Kenyon thinks it cannot
+ end so&mdash;and I do sometimes&mdash;and in the meantime I do confess to a
+ little 'savageness' also&mdash;at heart! All I asked him to say the other
+ day, was that he was not displeased with me&mdash;<i>and he wouldn't</i>; and
+ for me to walk across his displeasure spread on the threshold of the
+ door, and moreover take a sister and brother with me, and do such a
+ thing for the sake of going to Italy and securing a personal
+ advantage, were altogether impossible, obviously impossible! So poor
+ Papa is quite in disgrace with me just now&mdash;if he would but care for
+ <i>that</i>!
+</p>
+<p>
+ May God bless you. Amuse yourself well on Saturday. I could not see
+ you on Thursday any way, for Mr. Kenyon is here every day ... staying
+ in town just on account of this Pisa business, in his abundant
+ kindness.... On Monday then.
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">Ever yours,</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">E.B.B.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3>
+<i>R.B. to E.B.B.</i>
+</h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Thursday Morning.<br>
+[Post-mark, September 18, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ But you, too, will surely want, if you think me a rational creature,
+ <i>my</i> explanation&mdash;without which all that I have said and done would be
+ pure madness, I think. It <i>is</i> just 'what I see' that I <i>do</i> see,&mdash;or
+ rather it has proved, since I first visited you, that the reality was
+ infinitely worse than I know it to be ... for at, and after the
+ writing of <i>that first letter</i>, on my first visit, I believed&mdash;through
+ some silly or misapprehended talk, collected at second hand too&mdash;that
+ your complaint was of quite another nature&mdash;a spinal injury
+ irremediable in the nature of it. Had it been <i>so</i>&mdash;now speak for
+ <i>me</i>, for what you hope I am, and say how <i>that</i> should affect or
+ neutralize what you <i>were</i>, what I wished to associate with myself in
+ you? But <i>as you now are</i>:&mdash;then if I had married you seven years ago,
+ and this visitation came now first, I should be 'fulfilling a pious
+ duty,' I suppose, in enduring what could not be amended&mdash;a pattern to
+ good people in not running away ... for where were <i>now</i> the use and
+ the good and the profit and&mdash;
+</p>
+<p>
+ I desire in this life (with very little fluctuation for a man and too
+ weak a one) to live and just write out certain things which are in me,
+ and so save my soul. I would endeavour to do this if I were forced to
+ 'live among lions' as you once said&mdash;but I should best do this if I
+ lived quietly with myself and with you. That you cannot dance like
+ Cerito does not materially disarrange this plan&mdash;nor that I might
+ (beside the perpetual incentive and sustainment and consolation) get,
+ over and above the main reward, the incidental, particular and
+ unexpected happiness of being allowed when not working to rather
+ occupy myself with watching you, than with certain other pursuits I
+ might be otherwise addicted to&mdash;<i>this</i>, also, does not constitute an
+ obstacle, as I see obstacles.
+</p>
+<p>
+ But <i>you</i> see them&mdash;and I see <i>you</i>, and know my first duty and do it
+ resolutely if not cheerfully.
+</p>
+<p>
+ As for referring again, till leave by word or letter&mdash;you will see&mdash;
+</p>
+<p>
+ And very likely, the tone of this letter even will be
+ misunderstood&mdash;because I studiously cut out all vain words, protesting
+ &amp;c.:&mdash;No&mdash;will it?
+</p>
+<p>
+ I said, unadvisedly, that Saturday was taken from me ... but it was
+ dark and I had not looked at the tickets: the hour of the performance
+ is later than I thought. If to-morrow does not suit you, as I infer,
+ let it be Saturday&mdash;at 3&mdash;and I will leave earlier, a little, and all
+ will be quite right here. One hint will apprise me.
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">God bless you, dearest friend.</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">R.B.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Something else just heard, makes me reluctantly strike out
+ <i>Saturday</i>&mdash;
+</p>
+<p>
+ <i>Monday</i> then?
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3>
+<i>E.B.B. to R.B.</i>
+</h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Friday Morning.<br>
+[Post-mark, September 19, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ It is not 'misunderstanding' you to know you to be the most generous
+ and loyal of all in the world&mdash;you overwhelm me with your
+ generosity&mdash;only while you see from above and I from below, we cannot
+ see the same thing in the same light. Moreover, if we <i>did</i>, I should
+ be more beneath you in one sense, than I am. Do me the justice of
+ remembering this whenever you recur in thought to the subject which
+ ends here in the words of it.
+</p>
+<p>
+ I began to write last Saturday to thank you for all the delight I had
+ had in Shelley, though you beguiled me about the pencil-marks, which
+ are few. Besides the translations, some of the original poems were not
+ in my copy and were, so, quite new to me. 'Marianne's Dream' I had
+ been anxious about to no end&mdash;I only know it now.&mdash;
+</p>
+<p>
+ On Monday at the usual hour. As to coming twice into town on Saturday,
+ that would have been quite foolish if it had been possible.
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">Dearest friend,</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">I am yours,</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">E.B.B.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3>
+<i>E.B.B. to R.B.</i>
+</h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">[Post-mark, September 24, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ I have nothing to say about Pisa, ... but a great deal (if I could say
+ it) about <i>you</i>, who do what is wrong by your own confession and are
+ ill because of it and make people uneasy&mdash;now <i>is</i> it right
+ altogether? is it right to do wrong?... for it comes to <i>that</i>:&mdash;and
+ is it kind to do so much wrong?... for it comes almost to <i>that</i>
+ besides. Ah&mdash;you should not indeed! I seem to see quite plainly that
+ you will be ill in a serious way, if you do not take care and take
+ exercise; and so you must consent to be teazed a little into taking
+ both. And if you will not take them here ... or not so effectually as
+ in other places; <i>why not go with your Italian friends</i>? Have you
+ thought of it at all? <i>I</i> have been thinking since yesterday that it
+ might be best for you to go at once, now that the probability has
+ turned quite against me. If I were going, I should ask you not to do
+ so immediately ... but you see how unlikely it is!&mdash;although I mean
+ still to speak my whole thoughts&mdash;I <i>will do that</i> ... even though
+ for the mere purpose of self-satisfaction. George came last night&mdash;but
+ there is an adverse star this morning, and neither of us has the
+ opportunity necessary. Only both he and I <i>will speak</i>&mdash;that is
+ certain. And Arabel had the kindness to say yesterday that if I liked
+ to go, she would go with me at whatever hazard&mdash;which is very
+ kind&mdash;but you know I could not&mdash;it would not be right of me. And
+ perhaps after all we may gain the point lawfully; and if not ... at
+ the worst ... the winter may be warm (it is better to fall into the
+ hands of God, as the Jew said) and I may lose less strength than
+ usual, ... having more than usual to lose ... and altogether it may
+ not be so bad an alternative. As to being the cause of any anger
+ against my sister, you would not advise me into such a position, I am
+ sure&mdash;it would be untenable for one moment.
+</p>
+<p>
+ But <i>you</i> ... in that case, ... would it not be good for your head if
+ you went at once? I praise myself for saying so to you&mdash;yet if it
+ really is good for you, I don't deserve the praising at all. And how
+ was it on Saturday&mdash;that question I did not ask yesterday&mdash;with Ben
+ Jonson and the amateurs? I thought of you at the time&mdash;I mean, on that
+ Saturday evening, nevertheless.
+</p>
+<p>
+ You shall hear when there is any more to say. May God bless you,
+ dearest friend! I am ever yours,
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">E.B.B.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3>
+<i>R.B. to E.B.B.</i>
+</h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Wednesday Evening.<br>
+[Post-mark, September 25, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ I walked to town, this morning, and back again&mdash;so that when I found
+ your note on my return, and knew what you had been enjoining me in the
+ way of exercise, I seemed as if I knew, too, why that energetic fit
+ had possessed me and why I succumbed to it so readily. You shall never
+ have to intimate twice to me that such an insignificant thing, even,
+ as the taking exercise should be done. Besides, I have many motives
+ now for wishing to continue well. But Italy <i>just now</i>&mdash;Oh, no! My
+ friends would go through Pisa, too.
+</p>
+<p>
+ On that subject I must not speak. And you have 'more strength to
+ lose,' and are so well, evidently so well; that is, so much better, so
+ sure to be still better&mdash;can it be that you will not go!
+</p>
+<p>
+ Here are your new notes on my verses. Where are my words for the
+ thanks? But you know what I feel, and shall feel&mdash;ever feel&mdash;for these
+ and for all. The notes would be beyond price to me if they came from
+ some dear Phemius of a teacher&mdash;but from you!
+</p>
+<p>
+ The Theatricals 'went off' with great éclat, and the performance was
+ really good, really clever or better. Forster's 'Kitely' was very
+ emphatic and earnest, and grew into great interest, quite up to the
+ poet's allotted tether, which is none of the longest. He pitched the
+ character's key note too gravely, I thought; <i>beginning</i> with
+ certainty, rather than mere suspicion, of evil. Dickens' 'Bobadil'
+ <i>was</i> capital&mdash;with perhaps a little too much of the consciousness of
+ entire cowardice ... which I don't so willingly attribute to the noble
+ would-be pacificator of Europe, besieger of Strigonium &amp;c.&mdash;but the
+ end of it all was really pathetic, as it should be, for Bobadil is
+ only too clever for the company of fools he makes wonderment for:
+ having once the misfortune to relish their society, and to need but
+ too pressingly their 'tobacco-money,' what can he do but suit himself
+ to their capacities?&mdash;And D. Jerrold was very amusing and clever in
+ his 'Country Gull'&mdash;And Mr. Leech superb in the Town Master Mathew.
+ All were good, indeed, and were voted good, and called on, and cheered
+ off, and praised heartily behind their backs and before the curtain.
+ Stanfield's function had exercise solely in the touching up (very
+ effectively) sundry 'Scenes'&mdash;painted scenes&mdash;and the dresses, which
+ were perfect, had the advantage of Mr. Maclise's experience. And&mdash;all
+ is told!
+</p>
+<p>
+ And now; I shall hear, you promise me, if anything occurs&mdash;with what
+ feeling, I wait and hope, you know. If there is <i>no</i> best of reasons
+ against it, Saturday, you remember, is my day&mdash;This fine weather, too!
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">May God bless my dearest friend&mdash;</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">Ever yours</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">R.B.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3>
+<i>E.B.B. to R.B.</i>
+</h3>
+ <p style="text-align: right">[Post-mark, September 25, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ I have spoken again, and the result is that we are in precisely the
+ same position; only with bitterer feelings on one side. If I go or
+ stay they <i>must</i> be bitter: words have been said that I cannot easily
+ forget, nor remember without pain; and yet I really do almost smile in
+ the midst of it all, to think how I was treated this morning as an
+ undutiful daughter because I tried to put on my gloves ... for there
+ was no worse provocation. At least he complained of the undutifulness
+ and rebellion (!!!) of everyone in the house&mdash;and when I asked if he
+ meant that reproach for <i>me</i>, the answer was that he meant it for all
+ of us, one with another. And I could not get an answer. He would not
+ even grant me the consolation of thinking that I sacrificed what I
+ supposed to be good, to <i>him</i>. I told him that my prospects of health
+ seemed to me to depend on taking this step, but that through my
+ affection for him, I was ready to sacrifice those to his pleasure if
+ he exacted it&mdash;only it was necessary to my self-satisfaction in future
+ years, to understand definitely that the sacrifice <i>was</i> exacted by
+ him and <i>was</i> made to him, ... and not thrown away blindly and by a
+ misapprehension. And he would not answer <i>that</i>. I might do my own
+ way, he said&mdash;<i>he</i> would not speak&mdash;<i>he</i> would not say that he was not
+ displeased with me, nor the contrary:&mdash;I had better do what I
+ liked:&mdash;for his part, he washed his hands of me altogether.
+</p>
+<p>
+ And so I have been very wise&mdash;witness how my eyes are swelled with
+ annotations and reflections on all this! The best of it is that now
+ George himself admits I can do no more in the way of speaking, ... I
+ have no spell for charming the dragons, ... and allows me to be
+ passive and enjoins me to be tranquil, and not 'make up my mind' to
+ any dreadful exertion for the future. Moreover he advises me to go on
+ with the preparations for the voyage, and promises to state the case
+ himself at the last hour to the 'highest authority'; and judge finally
+ whether it be possible for me to go with the necessary companionship.
+ And it seems best to go to Malta on the 3rd of October&mdash;if at all ...
+ from steam-packet reasons ... without excluding Pisa ... remember ...
+ by any means.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Well!&mdash;and what do you think? Might it be desirable for me to give up
+ the whole? Tell me. I feel aggrieved of course and wounded&mdash;and
+ whether I go or stay that feeling must last&mdash;I cannot help it. But my
+ spirits sink altogether at the thought of leaving England <i>so</i>&mdash;and
+ then I doubt about Arabel and Stormie ... and it seems to me that I
+ <i>ought not</i> to mix them up in a business of this kind where the
+ advantage is merely personal to myself. On the other side, George
+ holds that if I give up and stay even, there will be displeasure just
+ the same, ... and that, when once gone, the irritation will exhaust
+ and smooth itself away&mdash;which however does not touch my chief
+ objection. Would it be better ... more <i>right</i> ... to give it up?
+ Think for me. Even if I hold on to the last, at the last I shall be
+ thrown off&mdash;<i>that</i> is my conviction. But ... shall I give up <i>at
+ once</i>? Do think for me.
+</p>
+<p>
+ And I have thought that if you like to come on Friday instead of
+ Saturday ... as there is the uncertainty about next week, ... it would
+ divide the time more equally: but let it be as you like and according
+ to circumstances as you see them. Perhaps you have decided to go at
+ once with your friends&mdash;who knows? I wish I could know that you were
+ better to-day. May God bless you
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">Ever yours,</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">E.B.B.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3>
+<i>R.B. to E.B.B.</i>
+</h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">[Post-mark, September 25, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ You have said to me more than once that you wished I might never know
+ certain feelings <i>you</i> had been forced to endure. I suppose all of us
+ have the proper place where a blow should fall to be felt most&mdash;and I
+ truly wish <i>you</i> may never feel what I have to bear in looking on,
+ quite powerless, and silent, while you are subjected to this
+ treatment, which I refuse to characterize&mdash;so blind is it <i>for</i>
+ blindness. I think I ought to understand what a father may exact, and
+ a child should comply with; and I respect the most ambiguous of love's
+ caprices if they give never so slight a clue to their all-justifying
+ source. Did I, when you signified to me the probable objections&mdash;you
+ remember what&mdash;to myself, my own happiness,&mdash;did I once allude to,
+ much less argue against, or refuse to acknowledge those objections?
+ For I wholly sympathize, however it go against me, with the highest,
+ wariest, pride and love for you, and the proper jealousy and vigilance
+ they entail&mdash;but now, and here, the jewel is not being over guarded,
+ but ruined, cast away. And whoever is privileged to interfere should
+ do so in the possessor's own interest&mdash;all common sense
+ interferes&mdash;all rationality against absolute no-reason at all. And you
+ ask whether you ought to obey this no-reason? I will tell you: all
+ passive obedience and implicit submission of will and intellect is by
+ far too easy, if well considered, to be the course prescribed by God
+ to Man in this life of probation&mdash;for they <i>evade</i> probation
+ altogether, though foolish people think otherwise. Chop off your legs,
+ you will never go astray; stifle your reason altogether and you will
+ find it is difficult to reason ill. 'It is hard to make these
+ sacrifices!'&mdash;not so hard as to lose the reward or incur the penalty
+ of an Eternity to come; 'hard to effect them, then, and go through
+ with them'&mdash;<i>not</i> hard, when the leg is to be <i>cut off</i>&mdash;that it is
+ rather harder to keep it quiet on a stool, I know very well. The
+ partial indulgence, the proper exercise of one's faculties, there is
+ the difficulty and problem for solution, set by that Providence which
+ might have made the laws of Religion as indubitable as those of
+ vitality, and revealed the articles of belief as certainly as that
+ condition, for instance, by which we breathe so many times in a minute
+ to support life. But there is no reward proposed for the feat of
+ breathing, and a great one for that of believing&mdash;consequently there
+ must go a great deal more of voluntary effort to this latter than is
+ implied in the getting absolutely rid of it at once, by adopting the
+ direction of an infallible church, or private judgment of another&mdash;for
+ all our life is some form of religion, and all our action some belief,
+ and there is but one law, however modified, for the greater and the
+ less. In your case I do think you are called upon to do your duty to
+ yourself; that is, to God in the end. Your own reason should examine
+ the whole matter in dispute by every light which can be put in
+ requisition; and every interest that appears to be affected by your
+ conduct should have its utmost claims considered&mdash;your father's in the
+ first place; and that interest, not in the miserable limits of a few
+ days' pique or whim in which it would seem to express itself; but in
+ its whole extent ... the <i>hereafter</i> which all momentary passion
+ prevents him seeing ... indeed, the <i>present</i> on either side which
+ everyone else must see. And this examination made, with whatever
+ earnestness you will, I do think and am sure that on its conclusion
+ you should act, in confidence that a duty has been performed ...
+ <i>difficult</i>, or how were it a duty? Will it <i>not</i> be infinitely harder
+ to act so than to blindly adopt his pleasure, and die under it? Who
+ can <i>not</i> do that?
+</p>
+<p>
+ I fling these hasty rough words over the paper, fast as they will
+ fall&mdash;knowing to whom I cast them, and that any sense they may contain
+ or point to, will be caught and understood, and presented in a better
+ light. The hard thing ... this is all I want to say ... is to act on
+ one's own best conviction&mdash;not to abjure it and accept another will,
+ and say '<i>there</i> is my plain duty'&mdash;easy it is, whether plain or no!
+</p>
+<p>
+ How 'all changes!' When I first knew you&mdash;you know what followed. I
+ supposed you to labour under an incurable complaint&mdash;and, of course,
+ to be completely dependent on your father for its commonest
+ alleviations; the moment after that inconsiderate letter, I reproached
+ myself bitterly with the selfishness apparently involved in any
+ proposition I might then have made&mdash;for though I have never been at
+ all frightened of the world, nor mistrustful of my power to deal with
+ it, and get my purpose out of it if once I thought it worth while, yet
+ I could not but feel the consideration, of <i>what</i> failure would <i>now</i>
+ be, paralyse all effort even in fancy. When you told me lately that
+ 'you could never be poor'&mdash;all my solicitude was at an end&mdash;I had but
+ myself to care about, and I told you, what I believed and believe,
+ that I can at any time amply provide for that, and that I could
+ cheerfully and confidently undertake the removing <i>that</i> obstacle. Now
+ again the circumstances shift&mdash;and you are in what I should wonder at
+ as the veriest slavery&mdash;and I who <i>could</i> free you from it, I am here
+ scarcely daring to write ... though I know you must feel for me and
+ forgive what forces itself from me ... what retires so mutely into my
+ heart at your least word ... what <i>shall not</i> be again written or
+ spoken, if you so will ... that I should be made happy beyond all hope
+ of expression by. Now while I <i>dream</i>, let me once dream! I would
+ marry you now and thus&mdash;I would come when you let me, and go when you
+ bade me&mdash;I would be no more than one of your brothers&mdash;'<i>no
+ more</i>'&mdash;that is, instead of getting to-morrow for Saturday, I should
+ get Saturday as well&mdash;two hours for one&mdash;when your head ached I
+ should be <i>here</i>. I deliberately choose the realization of that dream
+ (&mdash;of sitting simply by you for an hour every day) rather than any
+ other, excluding you, I am able to form for this world, or any world I
+ know&mdash;And it will continue but a dream.
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">God bless my dearest E.B.B.</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">R.B.
+</p>
+<p>
+ You understand that I see you to-morrow, Friday, as you propose.
+</p>
+<p>
+ I am better&mdash;thank you&mdash;and will go out to-day.
+</p>
+<p>
+ You know what I am, what I would speak, and all I would do.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3>
+<i>E.B.B. to R.B.</i>
+</h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Friday Evening.<br>
+[Post-mark, September 27, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ I had your letter late last night, everyone almost, being out of the
+ house by an accident, so that it was left in the letter-box, and if I
+ had wished to answer it before I saw you, it had scarcely been
+ possible.
+</p>
+<p>
+ But it will be the same thing&mdash;for you know as well as if you saw my
+ answer, what it must be, what it cannot choose but be, on pain of
+ sinking me so infinitely below not merely your level but my own, that
+ the depth cannot bear a glance down. Yet, though I am not made of such
+ clay as to admit of my taking a base advantage of certain noble
+ extravagances, (and that I am not I thank God for your sake) I will
+ say, I must say, that your words in this letter have done me good and
+ made me happy, ... that I thank and bless you for them, ... and that
+ to receive such a proof of attachment from <i>you</i>, not only overpowers
+ every present evil, but seems to me a full and abundant amends for the
+ merely personal sufferings of my whole life. When I had read that
+ letter last night I <i>did</i> think so. I looked round and round for the
+ small bitternesses which for several days had been bitter to me, and I
+ could not find one of them. The tear-marks went away in the moisture
+ of new, happy tears. Why, how else could I have felt? how else do you
+ think I could? How would any woman have felt ... who could feel at all
+ ... hearing such words said (though 'in a dream' indeed) by such a
+ speaker?
+</p>
+<p>
+ And now listen to me in turn. You have touched me more profoundly than
+ I thought even <i>you</i> could have touched me&mdash;my heart was full when you
+ came here to-day. Henceforward I am yours for everything but to do you
+ harm&mdash;and I am yours too much, in my heart, ever to consent to do you
+ harm in that way. If I could consent to do it, not only should I be
+ less loyal ... but in one sense, less yours. I say this to you without
+ drawback and reserve, because it is all I am able to say, and perhaps
+ all I <i>shall</i> be able to say. However this may be, a promise goes to
+ you in it that none, except God and your will, shall interpose between
+ you and me, ... I mean, that if He should free me within a moderate
+ time from the trailing chain of this weakness, I will then be to you
+ whatever at that hour you shall choose ... whether friend or more than
+ friend ... a friend to the last in any case. So it rests with God and
+ with you&mdash;only in the meanwhile you are most absolutely free ...
+ 'unentangled' (as they call it) by the breadth of a thread&mdash;and if I
+ did not know that you considered yourself so, I would not see you any
+ more, let the effort cost me what it might. You may force me <i>feel</i>:
+ ... but you cannot force me to <i>think</i> contrary to my first thought
+ ... that it were better for you to forget me at once in one relation.
+ And if better for <i>you</i>, can it be bad for <i>me</i>? which flings me down
+ on the stone-pavement of the logicians.
+</p>
+<p>
+ And now if I ask a boon of you, will you forget afterwards that it
+ ever was asked? I have hesitated a great deal; but my face is down on
+ the stone-pavement&mdash;no&mdash;I will not ask to-day&mdash;It shall be for another
+ day&mdash;and may God bless you on this and on those that come after, my
+ dearest friend.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3>
+<i>R.B. to E.B.B.</i>
+</h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">[Post-mark, September 27, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ Think for me, speak for me, my dearest, <i>my own</i>! You that are all
+ great-heartedness and generosity, do that one more generous thing?
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">God bless you for</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">R.B.
+</p>
+<p>
+ What can it be you ask of me!&mdash;'a boon'&mdash;once my answer to <i>that</i> had
+ been the plain one&mdash;but now ... when I have better experience of&mdash;No,
+ now I have <SPAN class="sc-ex">best</span> experience of how you understand my interests; that at
+ last we <i>both</i> know what is my true good&mdash;so ask, ask! <i>My own</i>, now!
+ For there it is!&mdash;oh, do not fear I am '<i>entangled</i>'&mdash;my crown is
+ loose on my head, not nailed there&mdash;my pearl lies in my hand&mdash;I may
+ return it to the sea, if I will!
+</p>
+<p>
+ What is it you ask of me, this first asking?
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3>
+<i>E.B.B. to R.B.</i>
+</h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">[Post-mark, September 29, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ Then <i>first</i>, ... first, I ask you not to misunderstand. Because we do
+ not ... no, we do not ... agree (but disagree) as to 'what is your
+ true good' ... but disagree, and as widely as ever indeed.
+</p>
+<p>
+ The other asking shall come in its season ... some day before I go, if
+ I go. It only relates to a restitution&mdash;and you cannot guess it if you
+ try ... so don't try!&mdash;and perhaps you can't grant it if you try&mdash;and
+ I cannot guess.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Cabins and berths all taken in the Malta steamer for both third and
+ twentieth of October! see what dark lanterns the stars hold out, and
+ how I shall stay in England after all as I think! And thus we are
+ thrown back on the old Gibraltar scheme with its shifting of steamers
+ ... unless we take the dreary alternative of Madeira!&mdash;or Cadiz! Even
+ suppose Madeira, ... why it were for a few months alone&mdash;and there
+ would be no temptation to loiter as in Italy.
+</p>
+<p>
+ <i>Don't</i> think too hardly of poor Papa. You have his wrong side ... his
+ side of peculiar wrongness ... to you just now. When you have walked
+ round him you will have other thoughts of him.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Are you better, I wonder? and taking exercise and trying to be better?
+ May God bless you! Tuesday need not be the last day if you like to
+ take one more besides&mdash;for there is no going until the fourth or
+ seventh, ... and the seventh is the more probable of those two. But
+ now you have done with me until Tuesday.
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">Ever yours,</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">E.B.B.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>E.B.B. to R.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Wednesday.<br>
+[Post-mark, October 1, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ I have read to the last line of your 'Rosicrucian'; and my scepticism
+ grew and grew through Hume's process of doubtful doubts, and at last
+ rose to the full stature of incredulity ... for I never could believe
+ Shelley capable of such a book (call it a book!), not even with a
+ flood of boarding-school idiocy dashed in by way of dilution.
+ Altogether it roused me to deny myself so far as to look at the date
+ of the book, and to get up and travel to the other end of the room to
+ confront it with other dates in the 'Letters from Abroad' ... (I, who
+ never think of a date except the 'A.D.,' and am inclined every now and
+ then to write <i>that</i> down as 1548 ...) well! and on comparing these
+ dates in these two volumes before my eyes, I find that your
+ Rosicrucian was 'printed for Stockdale' in <i>1822</i>, and that Shelley
+ <i>died in the July of the same year</i>!!&mdash;There, is a vindicating fact
+ for you! And unless the 'Rosicrucian' went into more editions than
+ one, and dates here from a later one, ... which is not ascertainable
+ from this fragment of a titlepage, ... the innocence of the great poet
+ stands proved&mdash;now doesn't it? For nobody will say that he published
+ such a book in the last year of his life, in the maturity of his
+ genius, and that Godwin's daughter helped him in it! That 'dripping
+ dew' from the skeleton is the only living word in the book!&mdash;which
+ really amused me notwithstanding, from the intense absurdity of the
+ whole composition ... descriptions ... sentiments ... and morals.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Judge yourself if I had not better say 'No' about the cloak! I would
+ take it if you wished such a kindness to me&mdash;and although you might
+ find it very useful to yourself ... or to your mother or sister ...
+ still if you <i>wished</i> me to take it I should like to have it, and the
+ mantle of the prophet might bring me down something of his spirit! but
+ do you remember ... do you consider ... how many talkers there are in
+ this house, and what would be talked&mdash;or that it is not worth while to
+ provoke it all? And Papa, knowing it, would not like it&mdash;and
+ altogether it is far better, believe me, that you should keep your own
+ cloak, and I, the thought of the kindness you meditated in respect to
+ it. I have heard nothing more&mdash;nothing.
+</p>
+<p>
+ I was asked the other day by a very young friend of mine ... the
+ daughter of an older friend who once followed you up-stairs in this
+ house ... Mr. Hunter, an Independent minister ... for 'Mr. Browning's
+ autograph.' She wants it for a collection ... for her album&mdash;and so,
+ will you write out a verse or two on one side of note paper ... not as
+ you write for the printers ... and let me keep my promise and send it
+ to her? I forgot to ask you before. Or one verse will do ... anything
+ will do ... and don't let me be bringing you into vexation. It need
+ not be of MS. rarity.
+</p>
+<p>
+ You are not better ... really ... I fear. And your mother's being ill
+ affects you more than you like to admit, I fear besides. Will you,
+ when you write, say how <i>both</i> are ... nothing extenuating, you know.
+ May God bless you, my dearest friend.
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">Ever yours,</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">E.B.B.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>R.B. to E.B.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Thursday.<br>
+[Post-mark, October 2, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ Well, let us hope against hope in the sad matter of the novel&mdash;yet,
+ yet,&mdash;it <i>is</i> by Shelley, if you will have the truth&mdash;as I happen to
+ <i>know</i>&mdash;proof <i>last</i> being that Leigh Hunt told me he unearthed it in
+ Shelley's own library at Marlow once, to the writer's horror and
+ shame&mdash;'He snatched it out of my hands'&mdash;said H. Yet I thrust it into
+ yours ... so much for the subtle fence of friends who reach your heart
+ by a side-thrust, as I told you on Tuesday, after the enemy has fallen
+ back breathless and baffled. As for the date, that Stockdale was a
+ notorious pirate and raker-up of rash publications ... and, do you
+ know, I suspect the <i>title-page</i> is all that boasts such novelty,&mdash;see
+ if the <i>book</i>, the inside leaves, be not older evidently!&mdash;a common
+ trick of the 'trade' to this day. The history of this and 'Justrozzi,'
+ as it is spelt,&mdash;the other novel,&mdash;may be read in Medwin's
+ 'Conversations'&mdash;and, as I have been told, in Lady Ch. Bury's
+ 'Reminiscences' or whatever she calls them ... the 'Guistrozzi' was
+ <i>certainly</i> 'written in concert with'&mdash;somebody or other ... for I
+ confess the whole story grows monstrous and even the froth of wine
+ strings itself in bright bubbles,&mdash;ah, but this was the scum of the
+ fermenting vat, do you see? I am happy to say I forget the novel
+ entirely, or almost&mdash;and only keep the exact impression which you have
+ gained ... through me! 'The fair cross of gold <i>he dashed on the
+ floor</i>'&mdash;(<i>that</i> is my pet-line ... because the 'chill dew' of a place
+ not commonly supposed to favour humidity is a plagiarism from Lewis's
+ 'Monk,' it now flashes on me! Yes, Lewis, too, puts the phrase into
+ intense italics.) And now, please read a chorus in the 'Prometheus
+ Unbound' or a scene from the 'Cenci'&mdash;and join company with Shelley
+ again!
+</p>
+<p>
+ &mdash;From 'chill dew' I come to the <i>cloak</i>&mdash;you are quite right&mdash;and I
+ give up that fancy. Will you, then, take one more precaution when
+ <i>all</i> proper safe-guards have been adopted; and, when <i>everything</i> is
+ sure, contrive some one sureness besides, against cold or wind or
+ sea-air; and say '<i>this</i>&mdash;for the cloak which is not here, and to help
+ the heart's wish which is,'&mdash;so I shall be there <i>palpably</i>. Will you
+ do this? Tell me you will, to-morrow&mdash;and tell me all good news.
+</p>
+<p>
+ My Mother suffers still.... I hope she is no worse&mdash;but a little
+ better&mdash;certainly better. I am better too, in my unimportant way.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Now I will write you the verses ... some easy ones out of a paper-full
+ meant to go between poem and poem in my next number, and break the
+ shock of collision.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Let me kiss your hand&mdash;dearest! My heart and life&mdash;all is yours, and
+ forever&mdash;God make you happy as I am through you&mdash;Bless you
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">R.B.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>E.B.B. to R.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Saturday.<br>
+[Post-mark, October 6, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ Tuesday is given up in full council. The thing is beyond doubting of,
+ as George says and as you thought yesterday. And then George has it in
+ his head to beguile the Duke of Palmella out of a smaller cabin, so
+ that I might sail from the Thames on the twentieth&mdash;and whether he
+ succeeds or not, I humbly confess that one of the chief advantages of
+ the new plan if not the very chief (as <i>I</i> see it) is just in the
+ <i>delay</i>.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Your spring-song is full of beauty as you know very well&mdash;and 'that's
+ the wise thrush,' so characteristic of you (and of the thrush too)
+ that I was sorely tempted to ask you to write it 'twice over,' ... and
+ not send the first copy to Mary Hunter notwithstanding my promise to
+ her. And now when you come to print these fragments, would it not be
+ well if you were to stoop to the vulgarism of prefixing some word of
+ introduction, as other people do, you know, ... a title ... a name?
+ You perplex your readers often by casting yourself on their
+ intelligence in these things&mdash;and although it is true that readers in
+ general are stupid and can't understand, it is still more true that
+ they are lazy and won't understand ... and they don't catch your point
+ of sight at first unless you think it worth while to push them by the
+ shoulders and force them into the right place. Now these fragments ...
+ you mean to print them with a line between ... and not one word at the
+ top of it ... now don't you! And then people will read
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: center">Oh, to be in England
+</p>
+<p style="text-indent: 0em">and say to themselves ... 'Why who is this? ... who's out of England?'
+ Which is an extreme case of course; but you will see what I mean ...
+ and often I have observed how some of the very most beautiful of your
+ lyrics have suffered just from your disdain of the usual tactics of
+ writers in this one respect.
+</p>
+<p>
+ And you are not better, still&mdash;you are worse instead of better ... are
+ you not? Tell me&mdash;And what can you mean about 'unimportance,' when you
+ were worse last week ... this expiring week ... than ever before, by
+ your own confession? And now?&mdash;And your mother?
+</p>
+<p>
+ Yes&mdash;I promise! And so, ... <i>Elijah</i> will be missed instead of his
+ mantle ... which will be a losing contract after all. But it shall be
+ as you say. May you be able to say that you are better! God bless you.
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">Ever yours.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Never think of the 'White Slave.' I had just taken it up. The trash of
+ it is prodigious&mdash;far beyond Mr. Smythe. Not that I can settle upon a
+ book just now, in all this wind, to judge of it fairly.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>R.B. to E.B.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Monday Morning.<br>
+[Post-mark, October 6, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ I should certainly think that the Duke of Palmella may be induced, and
+ with no great difficulty, to give up a cabin under the
+ circumstances&mdash;and <i>then</i> the plan becomes really objection-proof, so
+ far as mortal plans go. But now you must think all the boldlier about
+ whatever difficulties remain, just because they are so much the fewer.
+ It <i>is</i> cold already in the mornings and evenings&mdash;cold and (this
+ morning) foggy&mdash;I did not ask if you continue to go out from time to
+ time.... I am sure you <i>should</i>,&mdash;you would so prepare yourself
+ properly for the fatigue and change&mdash;yesterday it was very warm and
+ fine in the afternoon, nor is this noontime so bad, if the requisite
+ precautions are taken. And do make 'journeys across the room,' and out
+ of it, meanwhile, and <i>stand</i> when possible&mdash;get all the strength
+ ready, now that so much is to be spent. Oh, if I were by you!
+</p>
+<p>
+ Thank you, thank you&mdash;I will devise titles&mdash;I quite see what you say,
+ now you do say it. I am (this Monday morning, the prescribed day for
+ efforts and beginnings) looking over and correcting what you read&mdash;to
+ press they shall go, and then the plays can follow gently, and then
+ ... 'Oh to be in Pisa. Now that E.B.B. is there!'&mdash;And I <i>shall</i> be
+ there!... I am much better to-day; and my mother better&mdash;and to-morrow
+ I shall see you&mdash;So come good things together!
+</p>
+<p>
+ Dearest&mdash;till to-morrow and ever I am yours, wholly yours&mdash;May God
+ bless you!
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">R.B.
+</p>
+<p>
+ You do not ask me that 'boon'&mdash;why is that?&mdash;Besides, I have my own
+ <i>real</i> boons to ask too, as you will inevitably find, and I shall
+ perhaps get heart by your example.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>E.B.B. to R.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">[Post-mark, October 7, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ Ah but the good things do <i>not</i> come together&mdash;for just as your letter
+ comes I am driven to asking you to leave Tuesday for Wednesday.
+</p>
+<p>
+ On Tuesday Mr. Kenyon is to be here or not to be here, he
+ says&mdash;there's a doubt; and you would rather go to a clear day. So if
+ you do not hear from me again I shall expect you on <i>Wednesday</i> unless
+ I hear to the contrary from you:&mdash;and if anything happens to Wednesday
+ you shall hear. Mr. Kenyon is in town for only two days, or three. I
+ never could grumble against him, so good and kind as he is&mdash;but he may
+ not come after all to-morrow&mdash;so it is not grudging the obolus to
+ Belisarius, but the squandering of the last golden days at the bottom
+ of the purse.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Do I 'stand'&mdash;Do I walk? Yes&mdash;most uprightly. I 'walk upright every
+ day.' Do I go out? no, never. And I am not to be scolded for <i>that</i>,
+ because when you were looking at the sun to-day, I was marking the
+ east wind; and perhaps if I had breathed a breath of it ... farewell
+ Pisa. People who can walk don't always walk into the lion's den as a
+ consequence&mdash;do they? should they? Are you 'sure that they should?' I
+ write in great haste. So Wednesday then ... perhaps!
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">And yours every day.
+</p>
+<p>
+ You understand. Wednesday&mdash;if nothing to the contrary.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>R.B. to E.B.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">12&mdash;Wednesday.<br>
+[Post-mark, October 8, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ Well, dearest, at all events I get up with the assurance I shall see
+ you, and go on till the fatal 11-1/4 p.m. believing in the same, and
+ <i>then</i>, if after all there <i>does</i> come such a note as this with its
+ instructions, why, first, it <i>is</i> such a note and such a gain, and
+ next it makes a great day out of to-morrow that was to have been so
+ little of a day, that is all. Only, only, I am suspicious, now, of a
+ real loss to me in the end; for, <i>putting</i> off yesterday, I dared put
+ off (on your part) Friday to Saturday ... while <i>now</i> ... what shall
+ be said to that?
+</p>
+<p>
+ Dear Mr. Kenyon to be the smiling inconscious obstacle to any pleasure
+ of mine, if it were merely pleasure!
+</p>
+<p>
+ But I want to catch our next post&mdash;to-morrow, then, excepting what is
+ to be excepted!
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">Bless you, my dearest&mdash;</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">Your own</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">R.B.</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>E.B.B. to R.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Wednesday Evening.<br>
+[Post-mark, October 8, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ Mr. Kenyon never came. My sisters met him in the street, and he had
+ been 'detained all day in the city and would certainly be here
+ to-morrow,' Wednesday! And so you see what has happened to Wednesday!
+ Moreover he may come besides on Thursday, ... I can answer for
+ nothing. Only if I do not write and if you find Thursday admissible,
+ will you come then? In the case of an obstacle, you shall hear. And it
+ is not (in the meantime) my fault&mdash;now is it? I have been quite enough
+ vexed about it, indeed.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Did the Monday work work harm to the head, I wonder? I do fear so that
+ you won't get through those papers with impunity&mdash;especially if the
+ plays are to come after ... though ever so 'gently.' And if you are to
+ suffer, it would be right to tongue-tie that silver Bell, and leave
+ the congregations to their selling of cabbages. Which is
+ unphilanthropic of me perhaps, ... <span title="ô philtate">&omega; &phi;&iota;&lambda;&tau;&alpha;&tau;&epsilon;</span>.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Be sure that I shall be 'bold' when the time for going comes&mdash;and both
+ bold and capable of the effort. I am desired to keep to the respirator
+ and the cabin for a day or two, while the cold can reach us; and
+ midway in the bay of Biscay some change of climate may be felt, they
+ say. There is no sort of danger for me; except that I shall <i>stay in
+ England</i>. And why is it that I feel to-night more than ever almost, as
+ if I should stay in England? Who can tell? <i>I</i> can tell one thing.
+ <i>If</i> I stay, it will not be from a failure in my resolution&mdash;<i>that
+ will</i> not be&mdash;<i>shall</i> not be. Yes&mdash;and Mr. Kenyon and I agreed the
+ other day that there was something of the tigress-nature very
+ distinctly cognisable under what he is pleased to call my
+ 'Ba-lambishness.'
+</p>
+<p>
+ Then, on Thursday!... unless something happens to <i>Thursday</i> ... and I
+ shall write in that case. And I trust to you (as always) to attend to
+ your own convenience&mdash;just as you may trust to me to remember my own
+ 'boon.' Ah&mdash;you are curious, I think! Which is scarcely wise of
+ you&mdash;because it <i>may</i>, you know, be the roc's egg after all. But no,
+ it <i>isn't</i>&mdash;I will say just so much. And besides I <i>did</i> say that it
+ was a 'restitution,' which limits the guesses if it does not put an
+ end to them. Unguessable, I choose it to be.
+</p>
+<p>
+ And now I feel as if I should <i>not</i> stay in England. Which is the
+ difference between one five minutes and another. May God bless you.
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">Ever yours,</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">E.B.B.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>E.B.B. to R.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">[Post-mark, October 11, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ Dear Mr. Kenyon has been here again, and talking so (in his kindness
+ too) about the probabilities as to Pisa being against me ... about all
+ depending 'on one throw' and the 'dice being loaded' &amp;c. ... that I
+ looked at him aghast as if he looked at the future through the folded
+ curtain and was licensed to speak oracles:&mdash;and ever since I have been
+ out of spirits ... oh, out of spirits&mdash;and must write myself back
+ again, or try. After all he may be wrong like another&mdash;and I should
+ tell you that he reasons altogether from the delay ... and that 'the
+ cabins will therefore be taken' and the 'circular bills' out of reach!
+ He <i>said</i> that one of his purposes in staying in town, was to
+ '<i>knout</i>' me every day&mdash;didn't he?
+</p>
+<p>
+ Well&mdash;George will probably speak before <i>he</i> leaves town, which will
+ be on Monday! and now that the hour approaches, I do feel as if the
+ house stood upon gunpowder, and as if I held Guy Fawkes's lantern in
+ my right hand. And no: I shall not go. The obstacles will not be those
+ of Mr. Kenyon's finding&mdash;and what their precise character will be I do
+ not see distinctly. Only that they will be sufficient, and thrown by
+ one hand just where the wheel should turn, ... <i>that</i>, I see&mdash;and you
+ will, in a few days.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Did you go to Moxon's and settle the printing matter? Tell me. And
+ what was the use of telling Mr. Kenyon that you were 'quite well' when
+ you know you are not? Will you say to me how you are, saying the
+ truth? and also how your mother is?
+</p>
+<p>
+ To show the significance of the omission of those evening or rather
+ night visits of Papa's&mdash;for they came sometimes at eleven, and
+ sometimes at twelve&mdash;I will tell you that he used to sit and talk in
+ them, and then <i>always</i> kneel and pray with me and for me&mdash;which I
+ used of course to feel as a proof of very kind and affectionate
+ sympathy on his part, and which has proportionably pained me in the
+ withdrawing. They were no ordinary visits, you observe, ... and he
+ could not well throw me further from him than by ceasing to pay
+ them&mdash;the thing is quite expressively significant. Not that I pretend
+ to complain, nor to have reason to complain. One should not be
+ grateful for kindness, only while it lasts: <i>that</i> would be a
+ short-breathed gratitude. I just tell you the fact, proving that it
+ cannot be accidental.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Did you ever, ever tire me? Indeed no&mdash;you never did. And do
+ understand that I am not to be tired 'in that way,' though as Mr. Boyd
+ said once of his daughter, one may be so 'far too effeminate.' No&mdash;if
+ I were put into a crowd I should be tired soon&mdash;or, apart from the
+ crowd, if you made me discourse orations De Coronâ ... concerning your
+ bag even ... I should be tired soon&mdash;though peradventure not very much
+ sooner than you who heard. But on the smooth ground of quiet
+ conversation (particularly when three people don't talk at once as my
+ brothers do ... to say the least!) I last for a long while:&mdash;not to
+ say that I have the pretension of being as good and inexhaustible a
+ listener to your own speaking as you could find in the world. So
+ please not to accuse me of being tired again. I can't be tired, and
+ won't be tired, you see.
+</p>
+<p>
+ And now, since I began to write this, there is a new evil and
+ anxiety&mdash;a worse anxiety than any&mdash;for one of my brothers is ill; had
+ been unwell for some days and we thought nothing of it, till to-day
+ Saturday: and the doctors call it a fever of the typhoid character ...
+ not typhus yet ... but we are very uneasy. You must not come on
+ Wednesday if an infectious fever be in the house&mdash;<i>that</i> must be out
+ of the question. May God bless you&mdash;I am quite heavy-hearted to-day,
+ but never less yours,
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">E.B.B.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>R.B. to E.B.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Sunday.<br>
+[Post-mark, October 13, 1845].
+</p>
+<p>
+ These are bad news, dearest&mdash;all bad, except the enduring comfort of
+ your regard; the illness of your brother is worst ... that <i>would</i>
+ stay you, and is the first proper obstacle. I shall not attempt to
+ speak and prove my feelings,&mdash;you know what even Flush is to me
+ through you: I wait in anxiety for the next account.
+</p>
+<p>
+ If after all you do <i>not</i> go to Pisa; why, we must be cheerful and
+ wise, and take courage and hope. I cannot but see with your eyes and
+ from your place, you know,&mdash;and will let this all be one surprizing
+ and deplorable mistake of mere love and care ... but no such another
+ mistake ought to be suffered, if you escape the effects of this. I
+ will not cease to believe in a better event, till the very last,
+ however, and it is a deep satisfaction that all has been made plain
+ and straight up to this strange and sad interposition like a bar. You
+ have done <i>your</i> part, at least&mdash;with all that forethought and counsel
+ from friends and adequate judges of the case&mdash;so, if the bar <i>will</i>
+ not move, you will consider&mdash;will you not, dearest?&mdash;where one may
+ best encamp in the unforbidden country, and wait the spring and fine
+ weather. Would it be advisable to go where Mr. Kenyon suggested, or
+ elsewhere? Oh, these vain wishes ... the will here, and no means!
+</p>
+<p>
+ My life is bound up with yours&mdash;my own, first and last love. What
+ wonder if I feared to tire you&mdash;I who, knowing you as I do, admiring
+ what is so admirable (let me speak), loving what must needs be loved,
+ fain to learn what you only can teach; proud of so much, happy in so
+ much of you; I, who, for all this, neither come to admire, nor feel
+ proud, nor be taught,&mdash;but only, only to live with you and be by
+ you&mdash;that is love&mdash;for I <i>know</i> the rest, as I say. I know those
+ qualities are in you ... but at them I could get in so many ways.... I
+ have your books, here are my letters you give me; you would answer my
+ questions were <i>I</i> in Pisa&mdash;well, and it all would amount to nothing,
+ infinitely much as I know it is; to nothing if I could not sit by you
+ and see you.... I can stop at that, but not before. And it seems
+ strange to me how little ... less than little I have laid open of my
+ feelings, the nature of them to you&mdash;I smile to think how if all this
+ while I had been acting with the profoundest policy in intention, so
+ as to pledge myself to nothing I could not afterwards perform with the
+ most perfect ease and security, I should have done not much unlike
+ what I <i>have</i> done&mdash;to be sure, one word includes many or all ... but
+ I have not said ... what I will not even now say ... you will
+ <i>know</i>&mdash;in God's time to which I trust.
+</p>
+<p>
+ I will answer your note now&mdash;the questions. I did go&mdash;(it may amuse
+ you to write on)&mdash;to Moxon's. First let me tell you that when I called
+ there the Saturday before, his brother (in his absence) informed me,
+ replying to the question when it came naturally in turn with a round
+ of like enquiries, that your poems continued to sell 'singularly
+ well'&mdash;they would 'end in bringing a clear profit,' he said. I thought
+ to catch him, and asked if they <i>had</i> done so ... 'Oh; not at the
+ beginning ... it takes more time&mdash;he answered. On Thursday I saw
+ Moxon&mdash;he spoke rather encouragingly of my own prospects. I send him a
+ sheetful to-morrow, I believe, and we are 'out' on the 1st of next
+ month. Tennyson, by the way, has got his pension, £200 per annum&mdash;by
+ the other way, Moxon has bought the MSS. of Keats in the possession of
+ Taylor the publisher, and is going to bring out a complete edition;
+ which is pleasant to hear.
+</p>
+<p>
+ After settling with Moxon I went to Mrs. Carlyle's&mdash;who told me
+ characteristic quaintnesses of Carlyle's father and mother over the
+ tea she gave me. And all yesterday, you are to know, I was in a
+ permanent mortal fright&mdash;for my uncle came in the morning to intreat
+ me to go to Paris in <i>the evening</i> about some urgent business of
+ his,&mdash;a five-minutes matter with his brother there,&mdash;and the affair
+ being really urgent and material to his and the brother's interest,
+ and no substitute being to be thought of, I was forced to promise to
+ go&mdash;in case a letter, which would arrive in Town at noon, should not
+ prove satisfactory. So I calculated times, and found I could be at
+ Paris to-morrow, and back again, <i>certainly</i> by Wednesday&mdash;and so not
+ lose you on that day&mdash;oh, the fear I had!&mdash;but I was sure then and
+ now, that the 17th would not see you depart. But night came, and the
+ last Dover train left, and I drew breath freely&mdash;this morning I find
+ the letter was all right&mdash;so may it be with all worse apprehensions!
+ What you fear, precisely that, never happens, as Napoleon observed and
+ thereon grew bold. I had stipulated for an hour's notice, if go I
+ must&mdash;and that was to be wholly spent in writing to you&mdash;for in quiet
+ consternation my mother cared for my carpet bag.
+</p>
+<p>
+ And so, I shall hear from you to-morrow ... that is, you will write
+ <i>then</i>, telling me <i>all</i> about your brother. As for what you say, with
+ the kindest intentions, 'of fever-contagion' and keeping away on
+ Wednesday on <i>that</i> account, it is indeed 'out of the question,'&mdash;for
+ a first reason (which dispenses with any second) because I disbelieve
+ altogether in contagion from fevers, and especially from typhus
+ fevers&mdash;as do much better-informed men than myself&mdash;I speak quite
+ advisedly. If there should be only <i>that</i> reason, therefore, you will
+ not deprive me of the happiness of seeing you next Wednesday.
+</p>
+<p>
+ I am not well&mdash;have a cold, influenza or some unpleasant thing, but am
+ better than yesterday&mdash;My mother is much better, I think (she and my
+ sister are resolute non-contagionists, mind you that!)
+</p>
+<p>
+ God bless you and all you love! dearest, I am your
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">R.B.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>E.B.B. to R.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Saturday.<br>
+[Post-mark, October 14, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ It was the merest foolishness in me to write about fevers and the rest
+ as I did to-day, just as if it could do any good, all the wringing of
+ hands in the world. And there is no typhus <i>yet</i> ... and no danger of
+ any sort I hope and trust!&mdash;and how weak it is that habit of spreading
+ the cloud which is in you all around you, how weak and selfish ... and
+ unlike what <i>you</i> would do ... just as you are unlike Mr. Kenyon. And
+ you <i>are</i> unlike him&mdash;and you were right on Thursday when you said
+ so, and I was wrong in setting up a phrase on the other side ... only
+ what I said came by an instinct because you seemed to be giving him
+ all the sunshine to use and carry, which should not be after all. But
+ you are unlike him and must be ... seeing that the producers must
+ differ from the 'nati consumere fruges' in the intellectual as in the
+ material. You create and he enjoys, and the work makes you pale and
+ the pleasure makes him ruddy, and it is so of a necessity. So differs
+ the man of genius from the man of letters&mdash;and then dear Mr. Kenyon is
+ not even a man of letters in a full sense ... he is rather a Sybarite
+ of letters. Do you think he ever knew what mental labour is? I fancy
+ not. Not more than he has known what mental inspiration is! And not
+ more than he has known what the strife of the heart is ... with all
+ his tenderness and sensibility. He seems to me to <i>evade</i> pain, and
+ where he suffers at all to do so rather negatively than positively ...
+ if you understand what I mean by that ... rather by a want than by a
+ blow: the secret of all being that he has a certain latitudinarianism
+ (not indifferentism) in his life and affections, and has no capacity
+ for concentration and intensity. Partly by temperament and partly by
+ philosophy he contrives to keep the sunny side of the street&mdash;though
+ never inclined to forget the blind man at the corner. Ah, dear Mr.
+ Kenyon: he is magnanimous in toleration, and excellent in
+ sympathy&mdash;and he has the love of beauty and the reverence of
+ genius&mdash;but the faculty of <i>worship</i> he has not: he will not worship
+ aright either your heroes or your gods ... and while you do it he only
+ 'tolerates' the act in you. Once he said ... not to me ... but I heard
+ of it: 'What, if genius should be nothing but scrofula?' and he doubts
+ (I very much fear) whether the world is not governed by a throw of
+ those very same 'loaded dice,' and no otherwise. Yet he reveres genius
+ in the acting of it, and recognizes a God in creation&mdash;only it is but
+ 'so far,' and not farther. At least I think not&mdash;and I have a right to
+ think what I please of him, holding him as I do, in such true
+ affection. One of the kindest and most indulgent of human beings has
+ he been to me, and I am happy to be grateful to him.
+</p>
+<p>
+ <i>Sunday.</i>&mdash;The Duke of Palmella takes the whole vessel for the 20th
+ and therefore if I go it must be on the 17th. Therefore (besides) as
+ George must be on sessions to-morrow, he will settle the question with
+ Papa to-night. In the meantime our poor Occy is not much better,
+ though a little, and is ordered leeches on his head, and is confined
+ to his bed and attended by physician and surgeon. It is not decided
+ typhus, but they will not answer for its not being infectious; and
+ although he is quite at the top of the house, two stories above me, I
+ shall not like you to come indeed. And then there will be only room
+ for a farewell, and I who am a coward shrink from the saying of it.
+ No&mdash;not being able to see you to-morrow, (Mr. Kenyon is to be here
+ to-morrow, he says) let us agree to throw away Wednesday. I will
+ write, ... you will write perhaps&mdash;and above all things you will
+ promise to write by the 'Star' on Monday, that the captain may give me
+ your letter at Gibraltar. You promise? But I shall hear from you
+ before then, and oftener than once, and you will acquiesce about
+ Wednesday and grant at once that there can be no gain, no good, in
+ that miserable good-bye-ing. I do not want the pain of it to remember
+ you by&mdash;I shall remember very well without it, be sure. Still it shall
+ be as you like&mdash;as you shall chose&mdash;and if you are <i>disappointed</i>
+ about Wednesday (if it is not vain in me to talk of disappointments)
+ why do with Wednesday as you think best ... always understanding that
+ there's no risk of infection.
+</p>
+<p>
+ <i>Monday.</i>&mdash;All this I had written yesterday&mdash;and to-day it all is
+ worse than vain. Do not be angry with me&mdash;do not think it my
+ fault&mdash;but <i>I do not go to Italy</i> ... it has ended as I feared. What
+ passed between George and Papa there is no need of telling: only the
+ latter said that I 'might go if I pleased, but that going it would be
+ under his heaviest displeasure.' George, in great indignation,
+ pressed the question fully: but all was vain ... and I am left in this
+ position ... to go, if I please, with his displeasure over me, (which
+ after what you have said and after what Mr. Kenyon has said, and after
+ what my own conscience and deepest moral convictions say aloud, I
+ would unhesitatingly do at this hour!) and necessarily run the risk of
+ exposing my sister and brother to that same displeasure ... from which
+ risk I shrink and fall back and feel that to incur it, is impossible.
+ Dear Mr. Kenyon has been here and we have been talking&mdash;and he sees
+ what I see ... that I am justified in going myself, but not in
+ bringing others into difficulty. The very kindness and goodness with
+ which they desire me (both my sisters) 'not to think of them,'
+ naturally makes me think more of them. And so, tell me that I am not
+ wrong in taking up my chain again and acquiescing in this hard
+ necessity. The bitterest 'fact' of all is, that I had believed Papa to
+ have loved me more than he obviously does: but I never regret
+ knowledge ... I mean I never would <i>un</i>know anything ... even were it
+ the taste of the apples by the Dead sea&mdash;and this must be accepted
+ like the rest. In the meantime your letter comes&mdash;and if I could seem
+ to be very unhappy after reading it ... why it would be 'all pretence'
+ on my part, believe me. Can you care for me so much ... <i>you</i>? Then
+ <i>that</i> is light enough to account for all the shadows, and to make
+ them almost unregarded&mdash;the shadows of the life behind. Moreover dear
+ Occy is somewhat better&mdash;with a pulse only at ninety: and the doctors
+ declare that visitors may come to the house without any manner of
+ danger. Or I should not trust to your theories&mdash;no, indeed: it was not
+ that I expected you to be afraid, but that <i>I</i> was afraid&mdash;and if I am
+ not ashamed for <i>that</i>, why at least I am, for being <i>lâche</i> about
+ Wednesday, when you thought of hurrying back from Paris only for it!
+ You <i>could</i> think <i>that</i>!&mdash;You <i>can</i> care for me so much!&mdash;(I come to
+ it again!) When I hold some words to my eyes ... such as these in
+ this letter ... I can see nothing beyond them ... no evil, no want.
+ There <i>is</i> no evil and no want. Am I wrong in the decision about
+ Italy? Could I do otherwise? I had courage and to spare&mdash;but the
+ question, you see, did not regard myself wholly. For the rest, the
+ 'unforbidden country' lies within these four walls. Madeira was
+ proposed in vain&mdash;and any part of England would be as objectionable as
+ Italy, and not more advantageous to <i>me</i> than Wimpole Street. To take
+ courage and be cheerful, as you say, is left as an alternative&mdash;and
+ (the winter may be mild!) to fall into the hands of God rather than of
+ man: <i>and I shall be here for your November, remember</i>.
+</p>
+<p>
+ And now that you are not well, will you take care? and not come on
+ Wednesday unless you are better? and never again bring me <i>wet
+ flowers</i>, which probably did all the harm on Thursday? I was afraid
+ for you then, though I said nothing. May God bless you.
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">Ever yours I am&mdash;your own.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Ninety is not a high pulse ... for a fever of this kind&mdash;is it? and
+ the heat diminishes, and his spirits are better&mdash;and we are all much
+ easier ... have been both to-day and yesterday indeed.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>R.B. to E.B.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Tuesday Morning,<br>
+[Post-mark, October 14, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ Be sure, my own, dearest love, that this is for the best; will be seen
+ for the best in the end. It is hard to bear now&mdash;but <i>you</i> have to
+ bear it; any other person could not, and you will, I know, knowing
+ you&mdash;<i>will</i> be well this one winter if you can, and then&mdash;since I am
+ <i>not</i> selfish in this love to you, my own conscience tells me,&mdash;I
+ desire, more earnestly than I ever knew what desiring was, to be yours
+ and with you and, as far as may be in this life and world, <SPAN class="sc-ex">you</span>&mdash;and
+ no hindrance to that, but one, gives me a moment's care or fear; but
+ that one is just your little hand, as I could fancy it raised in any
+ least interest of yours&mdash;and before that, I am, and would ever be,
+ still silent. But now&mdash;what is to make you raise that hand? I will not
+ speak <i>now</i>; not seem to take advantage of your present feelings,&mdash;we
+ will be rational, and all-considering and weighing consequences, and
+ foreseeing them&mdash;but first I will prove ... if <i>that</i> has to be done,
+ why&mdash;but I begin speaking, and I should not, I know.
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">Bless you, love!</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">R.B.
+</p>
+<p>
+ To-morrow I see you, without fail. I am rejoiced as you can imagine,
+ at your brother's improved state.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>E.B.B. to R.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Tuesday,<br>
+[Post-mark, October 15, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ Will this note reach you at the 'fatal hour' ... or sooner? At any
+ rate it is forced to ask you to take Thursday for Wednesday, inasmuch
+ as Mr. Kenyon in his exceeding kindness has put off his journey just
+ for <i>me</i>, he says, because he saw me depressed about the decision, and
+ wished to come and see me again to-morrow and talk the spirits up, I
+ suppose. It is all so kind and good, that I cannot find a voice to
+ grumble about the obligation it brings of writing thus. And then, if
+ you suffer from cold and influenza, it will be better for you not to
+ come for another day, ... I think <i>that</i>, for comfort. Shall I hear
+ how you are to-night, I wonder? Dear Occy 'turned the corner,' the
+ physician said, yesterday evening, and, although a little fluctuating
+ to-day, remains on the whole considerably better. They were just in
+ time to keep the fever from turning to typhus.
+</p>
+<p>
+ How fast you print your book, for it is to be out on the first of
+ November! Why it comes out suddenly like the sun. Mr. Kenyon asked me
+ if I had seen anything you were going to print; and when I mentioned
+ the second part of the 'Duchess' and described how your perfect
+ rhymes, perfectly new, and all clashing together as by natural
+ attraction, had put me at once to shame and admiration, he began to
+ praise the first part of the same poem (which I had heard him do
+ before, by the way) and extolled it as one of your most striking
+ productions.
+</p>
+<p>
+ And so until Thursday! May God bless you&mdash;
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">and as the heart goes, ever yours.
+</p>
+<p>
+ I am glad for Tennyson, and glad for Keats. It is well to be able to
+ be glad about something&mdash;is is it not? about something out of
+ ourselves. And (<i>in</i> myself) I shall be most glad, if I have a letter
+ to-night. Shall I?
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>R.B. to E.B.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">[Post-mark, October 15, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ Thanks, my dearest, for the good news&mdash;of the fever's abatement&mdash;it is
+ good, too, that you write cheerfully, on the whole: what is it to <i>me</i>
+ that you write is of <i>me</i> ... I shall never say <i>that</i>! Mr. Kenyon is
+ all kindness, and one gets to take it as not so purely natural a
+ thing, the showing kindness to those it concerns, and belongs
+ to,&mdash;well! On Thursday, then,&mdash;to-morrow! Did you not get a note of
+ mine, a hurried note, which was meant for yesterday-afternoon's
+ delivery?
+</p>
+<p>
+ Mr. Forster came yesterday and was very profuse of graciosities: he
+ may have, or must have meant well, so we will go on again with the
+ friendship, as the snail repairs his battered shell.
+</p>
+<p>
+ My poems went duly to press on Monday night&mdash;there is not much
+ <i>correctable</i> in them,&mdash;you make, or you spoil, one of these things;
+ that is, <i>I</i> do. I have adopted all your emendations, and thrown in
+ lines and words, just a morning's business; but one does not write
+ plays so. You may like some of my smaller things, which stop
+ interstices, better than what you have seen; I shall wonder to know. I
+ am to receive a <i>proof</i> at the end of the week&mdash;will you help me and
+ over-look it. ('Yes'&mdash;she says ... my thanks I do not say!&mdash;)
+</p>
+<p>
+ While writing this, the <i>Times</i> catches my eye (it just came in) and
+ something from the <i>Lancet</i> is extracted, a long article against
+ quackery&mdash;and, as I say, this is the first and only sentence I
+ read&mdash;'There is scarcely a peer of the realm who is not the patron of
+ some quack pill or potion: and the literati too, are deeply tainted.
+ We have heard of barbarians who threw quacks and their medicines into
+ the sea: but here in England we have Browning, a prince of poets,
+ touching the pitch which defiles and making Paracelsus the hero of a
+ poem. Sir E.L. Bulwer writes puffs for the water doctors in a style
+ worthy of imitation by the scribe that does the poetical for Moses and
+ Son. Miss Martineau makes a finessing servant girl her
+ physician-general: and Richard Howitt and the Lady aforesaid stand
+ God-father and mother to the contemptible mesmeric vagaries of Spencer
+ Hall.'&mdash;Even the sweet incense to me fails of its effect if Paracelsus
+ is to figure on a level with Priessnitz, and 'Jane'!
+</p>
+<p>
+ What weather, now at last! Think for yourself and for me&mdash;could you
+ not go out on such days?
+</p>
+<p>
+ I am quite well now&mdash;cold, over and gone. Did I tell you my Uncle
+ arrived from Paris on Monday, as they hoped he would&mdash;so my travel
+ would have been to great purpose!
+</p>
+<p>
+ Bless my dearest&mdash;my own!
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">R.B.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>E.B.B. to R.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Wednesday.<br>
+[Post-mark, October 16, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ Your letter which should have reached me in the morning of yesterday,
+ I did not receive until nearly midnight&mdash;partly through the
+ eccentricity of our new postman whose good pleasure it is to make use
+ of the letter-box without knocking; and partly from the confusion in
+ the house, of illness in different ways ... the very servants being
+ ill, ... one of them breaking a blood-vessel&mdash;for there is no new case
+ of fever; ... and for dear Occy, he grows better slowly day by day.
+ And just so late last night, five letters were found in the
+ letter-box, and mine ... yours ... among them&mdash;which accounts for my
+ beginning to answer it only now.
+</p>
+<p>
+ What am I to say but this ... that I know what you are ... and that I
+ know also what you are to <i>me</i>,&mdash;and that I should accept that
+ knowledge as more than sufficient recompense for worse vexations than
+ these late ones. Therefore let no more be said of them: and no more
+ <i>need</i> be said, even if they were not likely to prove their own end
+ good, as I believe with you. You may be quite sure that I shall be
+ well this winter, if in any way it should be possible, and that I
+ <i>will not</i> be beaten down, if the will can do anything. I admire how,
+ if all had happened so but a year ago, (yet it could not have happened
+ quite <i>so</i>!), I should certainly have been beaten down&mdash;and how it is
+ different now, ... and how it is only gratitude to you, to <i>say</i> that
+ it is different now. My cage is not worse but better since you brought
+ the green groundsel to it&mdash;and to dash oneself against the wires of it
+ will not open the door. We shall see ... and God will oversee. And in
+ the meantime you will not talk of extravagances; and then nobody need
+ hold up the hand&mdash;because, as I said and say, I am yours, your
+ own&mdash;only not to <i>hurt you</i>. So now let us talk of the first of
+ November and of the poems which are to come out then, and of the poems
+ which are to come after then&mdash;and of the new avatar of 'Sordello,' for
+ instance, which you taught me to look for. And let us both be busy and
+ cheerful&mdash;and you will come and see me throughout the winter, ... if
+ you do not decide rather on going abroad, which may be better ...
+ better for your health's sake?&mdash;in which case I shall have your
+ letters.
+</p>
+<p>
+ And here is another ... just arrived. How I thank you. Think of the
+ <i>Times</i>! Still it was very well of them to recognise your
+ principality. Oh yes&mdash;do let me see the proof&mdash;I understand too about
+ the 'making and spoiling.'
+</p>
+<p>
+ Almost you forced me to smile by thinking it worth while to say that
+ you are '<i>not selfish</i>.' Did Sir Percival say so to Sir Gawaine across
+ the Round Table, in those times of chivalry to which you belong by the
+ soul? Certainly you are not selfish! May God bless you.
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">Ever your</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">E.B.B.
+</p>
+<p>
+ The fever may last, they say, for a week longer, or even a
+ fortnight&mdash;but it <i>decreases</i>. Yet he is hot still, and very weak.
+</p>
+<p>
+ To to-morrow!
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>E.B.B. to R.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Friday.<br>
+[Post-mark, October 17, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ Do tell me what you mean precisely by your 'Bells and Pomegranates'
+ title. I have always understood it to refer to the Hebraic priestly
+ garment&mdash;but Mr. Kenyon held against me the other day that your
+ reference was different, though he had not the remotest idea how. And
+ yesterday I forgot to ask, for not the first time. Tell me too why you
+ should not in the new number satisfy, by a note somewhere, the Davuses
+ of the world who are in the majority ('Davi sumus, non Oedipi') with a
+ solution of this one Sphinx riddle. Is there a reason against it?
+</p>
+<p>
+ Occy continues to make progress&mdash;with a pulse at only eighty-four this
+ morning. Are you learned in the pulse that I should talk as if you
+ were? <i>I</i>, who have had my lessons? He takes scarcely anything yet but
+ water, and his head is very hot still&mdash;but the progress is quite
+ sure, though it may be a lingering case.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Your beautiful flowers!&mdash;none the less beautiful for waiting for water
+ yesterday. As fresh as ever, they were; and while I was putting them
+ into the water, I thought that your visit went on all the time. Other
+ thoughts too I had, which made me look down blindly, quite blindly, on
+ the little blue flowers, ... while I thought what I could not have
+ said an hour before without breaking into tears which would have run
+ faster then. To say now that I never can forget; that I feel myself
+ bound to you as one human being cannot be more bound to another;&mdash;and
+ that you are more to me at this moment than all the rest of the world;
+ is only to say in new words that it would be a wrong against <i>myself</i>,
+ to seem to risk your happiness and abuse your generosity. For <i>me</i> ...
+ though you threw out words yesterday about the testimony of a 'third
+ person,' ... it would be monstrous to assume it to be necessary to
+ vindicate my trust of you&mdash;<i>I trust you implicitly</i>&mdash;and am not too
+ proud to owe all things to you. But now let us wait and see what this
+ winter does or undoes&mdash;while God does His part for good, as we know. I
+ will never fail to you from any human influence whatever&mdash;<i>that</i> I
+ have promised&mdash;but you must let it be different from the other sort of
+ promise which it would be a wrong to make. May God bless you&mdash;you,
+ whose fault it is, to be too generous. You <i>are</i> not like other men,
+ as I could see from the beginning&mdash;no.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Shall I have the proof to-night, I ask myself.
+</p>
+<p>
+ And if you like to come on Monday rather than Tuesday, I do not see
+ why there should be a 'no' to that. Judge from your own convenience.
+ Only we must be wise in the general practice, and abstain from too
+ frequent meetings, for fear of difficulties. I am Cassandra you know,
+ and smell the slaughter in the bath-room. It would make no difference
+ in fact; but in comfort, much.
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">Ever your own&mdash;
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>R.B. to E.B.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Saturday.<br>
+[Post-mark, October 18, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ I must not go on tearing these poor sheets one after the other,&mdash;the
+ proper phrases <i>will not</i> come,&mdash;so let them stay, while you care for
+ my best interests in their best, only way, and say for <i>me</i> what I
+ would say if I could&mdash;dearest,&mdash;say it, as I feel it!
+</p>
+<p>
+ I am thankful to hear of the continued improvement of your brother. So
+ may it continue with him! Pulses I know very little about&mdash;I go by
+ your own impressions which are evidently favourable.
+</p>
+<p>
+ I will make a note as you suggest&mdash;or, perhaps, keep it for the
+ closing number (the next), when it will come fitly in with two or
+ three parting words I shall have to say. The Rabbis make Bells and
+ Pomegranates symbolical of Pleasure and Profit, the gay and the grave,
+ the Poetry and the Prose, Singing and Sermonizing&mdash;such a mixture of
+ effects as in the original hour (that is quarter of an hour) of
+ confidence and creation. I meant the whole should prove at last. Well,
+ it <i>has</i> succeeded beyond my most adventurous wishes in one
+ respect&mdash;'Blessed eyes mine eyes have been, if&mdash;' if there was any
+ sweetness in the tongue or flavour in the seeds to <i>her</i>. But I shall
+ do quite other and better things, or shame on me! The proof has not
+ yet come.... I should go, I suppose, and enquire this afternoon&mdash;and
+ probably I will.
+</p>
+<p>
+ I weigh all the words in your permission to come on Monday ... do not
+ think <i>I</i> have not seen <i>that</i> contingency from the first! Let it be
+ Tuesday&mdash;no sooner! Meanwhile you are never away&mdash;never from your
+ place here.
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">God bless my dearest.</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">Ever yours</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">R.B.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>R.B. to E.B.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Monday Morning.<br>
+[In the same envelope with the preceding letter.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ This arrived on Saturday night&mdash;I just correct it in time for this our
+ first post&mdash;will it do, the new matter? I can take it to-morrow&mdash;when
+ I am to see you&mdash;if you are able to glance through it by then.
+</p>
+<p>
+ The 'Inscription,' how does that read?
+</p>
+<p>
+ There is strange temptation, by the way, in the space they please to
+ leave for the presumable 'motto'&mdash;'they but remind me of mine own
+ conception' ... but one must give no clue, of a silk's breadth, to the
+ '<i>Bower</i>,' <i>yet</i>, One day!
+</p>
+<p>
+ &mdash;Which God send you, dearest, and your
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">R.B.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>E.B.B. to R.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">[Post-mark, October 22, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ Even at the risk of teazing you a little I must say a few words, that
+ there may be no misunderstanding between us&mdash;and this, before I sleep
+ to-night. To-day and before to-day you surprised me by your manner of
+ receiving my remark about your visits, for I believed I had
+ sufficiently made clear to you long ago how certain questions were
+ ordered in this house and how no exception was to be expected for my
+ sake or even for yours. Surely I told you this quite plainly long ago.
+ I only meant to say in my last letter, in the same track ... (fearing
+ in the case of your wishing to come oftener that you might think it
+ unkind in me not to seem to wish the same) ... that if you came too
+ often and it was <i>observed</i>, difficulties and vexations would follow
+ as a matter of course, and it would be wise therefore to run no risk.
+ That was the head and front of what I meant to say. The weekly one
+ visit is a thing established and may go on as long as you please&mdash;and
+ there is no objection to your coming twice a week <i>now</i> and <i>then</i> ...
+ if now and then merely ... if there is no habit ... do you understand?
+ I may be prudent in an extreme perhaps&mdash;and certainly everybody in the
+ house is not equally prudent!&mdash;but I did shrink from running any risk
+ with that calm and comfort of the winter as it seemed to come on. And
+ was it more than I said about the cloak? was there any newness in it?
+ anything to startle you? Still I do perfectly see that whether new or
+ old, what it <i>involves</i> may well be unpleasant to you&mdash;and that
+ (however old) it may be apt to recur to your mind with a new
+ increasing unpleasantness. We have both been carried too far perhaps,
+ by late events and impulses&mdash;but it is never too late to come back to
+ a right place, and I for my part come back to mine, and entreat you my
+ dearest friend, first, <i>not to answer this</i>, and next, to weigh and
+ consider thoroughly 'that particular contingency' which (I tell you
+ plainly, I who know) the tongue of men and of angels would not modify
+ so as to render less full of vexations to you. Let Pisa prove the
+ excellent hardness of some marbles! Judge. From motives of
+ self-respect, you may well walk an opposite way ... <i>you</i>.... When I
+ told you once ... or twice ... that 'no human influence should' &amp;c.
+ &amp;c., ... I spoke for myself, quite over-looking you&mdash;and now that I
+ turn and see you, I am surprised that I did not see you before ...
+ <i>there</i>. I ask you therefore to consider 'that contingency' well&mdash;not
+ forgetting the other obvious evils, which the late decision about Pisa
+ has aggravated beyond calculation ... for as the smoke rolls off we
+ see the harm done by the fire. And so, and now ... is it not advisable
+ for you to go abroad at once ... as you always intended, you know ...
+ now that your book is through the press? What if you go next week? I
+ leave it to you. In any case <i>I entreat you not to answer
+ this</i>&mdash;neither let your thoughts be too hard on me for what you may
+ call perhaps vacillation&mdash;only that I stand excused (I do not say
+ justified) before my own moral sense. May God bless you. If you go, I
+ shall wait to see you till your return, and have letters in the
+ meantime. I write all this as fast as I can to have it over. What I
+ ask of you is, to consider alone and decide advisedly ... for both our
+ sakes. If it should be your choice not to make an end now, ... why I
+ shall understand <i>that</i> by your not going ... or you may say '<i>no</i>' in
+ a word ... for I require no '<i>protestations</i>' indeed&mdash;and <i>you</i> may
+ trust to <i>me</i> ... it shall be as you choose. <i>You will consider my
+ happiness most by considering your own</i> ... and that is my last word.
+</p>
+<p>
+ <i>Wednesday morning.</i>&mdash;I did not say half I thought about the poems
+ yesterday&mdash;and their various power and beauty will be striking and
+ surprising to your most accustomed readers. 'St. Praxed'&mdash;'Pictor
+ Ignotus'&mdash;'The Ride'&mdash;'The Duchess'!&mdash;Of the new poems I like
+ supremely the first and last ... that 'Lost Leader' which strikes so
+ broadly and deep ... which nobody can ever forget&mdash;and which is worth
+ all the journalizing and pamphleteering in the world!&mdash;and then, the
+ last 'Thought' which is quite to be grudged to that place of fragments
+ ... those grand sea-sights in the long lines. Should not these
+ fragments be severed otherwise than by numbers? The last stanza but
+ one of the 'Lost Mistress' seemed obscure to me. Is it so really? The
+ end you have put to 'England in Italy' gives unity to the whole ...
+ just what the poem wanted. Also you have given some nobler lines to
+ the middle than met me there before. 'The Duchess' appears to me more
+ than ever a new-minted golden coin&mdash;the rhythm of it answering to your
+ own description, 'Speech half asleep, or song half awake?' You have
+ right of trove to these novel effects of rhythm. Now if people do not
+ cry out about these poems, what are we to think of the world?
+</p>
+<p>
+ May God bless you always&mdash;send me the next proof <i>in any case</i>.
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">Your</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">E.B.B.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>R.B. to E.B.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">[Post-mark, October 23, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ But I <i>must</i> answer you, and be forgiven, too, dearest. I was (to
+ begin at the beginning) surely not '<i>startled</i>' ... only properly
+ aware of the deep blessing I have been enjoying this while, and not
+ disposed to take its continuance as pure matter of course, and so
+ treat with indifference the first shadow of a threatening intimation
+ from without, the first hint of a possible abstraction from the
+ quarter to which so many hopes and fears of mine have gone of late. In
+ this case, knowing you, I was sure that if any imaginable form of
+ displeasure could touch you without reaching me, I should not hear of
+ it too soon&mdash;so I spoke&mdash;so <i>you</i> have spoken&mdash;and so now you get
+ 'excused'? No&mdash;wondered at, with all my faculty of wonder for the
+ strange exalting way you will persist to think of me; now, once for
+ all, I <i>will</i> not pass for what I make no least pretence to. I quite
+ understand the grace of your imaginary self-denial, and fidelity to a
+ given word, and noble constancy; but it all happens to be none of
+ mine, none in the least. I love you because I <i>love</i> you; I see you
+ 'once a week' because I cannot see you all day long; I think of you
+ all day long, because I most certainly could not think of you once an
+ hour less, if I tried, or went to Pisa, or 'abroad' (in every sense)
+ in order to 'be happy' ... a kind of adventure which you seem to
+ suppose you have in some way interfered with. Do, for this once,
+ think, and never after, on the impossibility of your ever (you know I
+ must talk your own language, so I shall say&mdash;) hindering any scheme of
+ mine, stopping any supposable advancement of mine. Do you really think
+ that before I found you, I was going about the world seeking whom I
+ might devour, that is, be devoured by, in the shape of a wife ... do
+ you suppose I ever dreamed of marrying? What would it mean for me,
+ with my life I am hardened in&mdash;considering the rational chances; how
+ the land is used to furnish its contingent of Shakespeare's women: or
+ by 'success,' 'happiness' &amp;c. &amp;c. you never never can be seeing for a
+ moment with the world's eyes and meaning 'getting rich' and all that?
+ Yet, put that away, and what do you meet at every turn, if you are
+ hunting about in the dusk to catch my good, but yourself?
+</p>
+<p>
+ <i>I</i> know who has got it, caught it, and means to keep it on his
+ heart&mdash;the person most concerned&mdash;<i>I</i>, dearest, who cannot play the
+ disinterested part of bidding <i>you</i> forget your 'protestation' ...
+ what should I have to hold by, come what will, through years, through
+ this life, if God shall so determine, if I were not sure, <i>sure</i> that
+ the first moment when you can suffer me with you 'in that relation,'
+ you will remember and act accordingly. I will, as you know, conform my
+ life to <i>any</i> imaginable rule which shall render it possible for your
+ life to move with it and possess it, all the little it is worth.
+</p>
+<p>
+ For your friends ... whatever can be 'got over,' whatever opposition
+ may be rational, will be easily removed, I suppose. You know when I
+ spoke lately about the 'selfishness' I dared believe I was free from,
+ I hardly meant the low faults of ... I shall say, a different
+ organization to mine&mdash;which has vices in plenty, but not those.
+ Besides half a dozen scratches with a pen make one stand up an
+ apparent angel of light, from the lawyer's parchment; and Doctors'
+ Commons is one bland smile of applause. The selfishness I deprecate is
+ one which a good many women, and men too, call 'real passion'&mdash;under
+ the influence of which, I ought to say 'be mine, what ever happens to
+ <i>you</i>'&mdash;but I know better, and you know best&mdash;and you know me, for all
+ this letter, which is no doubt in me, I feel, but dear entire goodness
+ and affection, of which God knows whether I am proud or not&mdash;and now
+ you will let me be, will not you. Let me have my way, live my life,
+ love my love.
+</p>
+<p>
+ When I am, praying God to bless her ever,
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">R.B.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>E.B.B. to R.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">[Post-mark, October 24, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ '<i>And be forgiven</i>' ... yes! and be thanked besides&mdash;if I knew how to
+ thank you worthily and as I feel ... only that I do not know it, and
+ cannot say it. And it was not indeed 'doubt' of you&mdash;oh no&mdash;that made
+ me write as I did write; it was rather because I felt you to be surely
+ noblest, ... and therefore fitly dearest, ... that it seemed to me
+ detestable and intolerable to leave you on this road where the mud
+ must splash up against you, and never cry 'gare.' Yet I was quite
+ enough unhappy yesterday, and before yesterday ... I will confess
+ to-day, ... to be too gratefully glad to 'let you be' ... to 'let you
+ have your way'&mdash;you who overcome always! Always, but where you tell me
+ not to think of you so and so!&mdash;as if I could help thinking of you
+ <i>so</i>, and as if I should not take the liberty of persisting to think
+ of you just so. 'Let me be'&mdash;Let me have my way.' I am unworthy of you
+ perhaps in everything except one thing&mdash;and <i>that</i>, you cannot guess.
+ May God bless you&mdash;
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">Ever I am yours.
+</p>
+<p>
+ The proof does not come!
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>E.B.B. to R.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Friday.<br>
+[Post-mark, October 25, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ I wrote briefly yesterday not to make my letter longer by keeping it;
+ and a few last words which belong to it by right, must follow after it
+ ... must&mdash;for I want to say that you need not indeed talk to me about
+ squares being not round, and of <i>you</i> being not 'selfish'! You know it
+ is foolish to talk such superfluities, and not a compliment.
+</p>
+<p>
+ I won't say to my knowledge of you and faith in you ... but to my
+ understanding generally. Why should you say to me at all ... much
+ less for this third or fourth time ... 'I am not selfish?' to <i>me</i> who
+ never ... when I have been deepest asleep and dreaming, ... never
+ dreamed of attributing to you any form of such a fault? Promise not to
+ say so again&mdash;now promise. Think how it must sound to my ears, when
+ really and truly I have sometimes felt jealous of myself ... of my own
+ infirmities, ... and thought that you cared for me only because your
+ chivalry touched them with a silver sound&mdash;and that, without them, you
+ would pass by on the other side:&mdash;why twenty times I have thought
+ <i>that</i> and been vexed&mdash;ungrateful vexation! In exchange for which too
+ frank confession, I will ask for another silent promise ... a silent
+ promise&mdash;no, but first I will say another thing.
+</p>
+<p>
+ First I will say that you are not to fancy any the least danger of my
+ falling under displeasure through your visits&mdash;there is no sort of
+ risk of it <i>for the present</i>&mdash;and if I ran the risk of making you
+ uncomfortable about <i>that</i>, I did foolishly, and what I meant to do
+ was different. I wish you also to understand that <i>even if you came
+ here every day</i>, my brothers and sisters would simply care to know if
+ I liked it, and then be glad if I was glad:&mdash;the caution referred to
+ one person alone. In relation to <i>whom</i>, however, there will be no
+ 'getting over'&mdash;you might as well think to sweep off a third of the
+ stars of Heaven with the motion of your eyelashes&mdash;this, for matter of
+ fact and certainty&mdash;and this, as I said before, the keeping of a
+ general rule and from no disrespect towards individuals: a great
+ peculiarity <i>in the individual</i> of course. But ... though I have been
+ a submissive daughter, and this from no effort, but for love's sake
+ ... because I loved him tenderly (and love him), ... and hoped that he
+ loved me back again even if the proofs came untenderly sometimes&mdash;yet
+ I have reserved for myself <i>always</i> that right over my own affections
+ which is the most strictly personal of all things, and which involves
+ principles and consequences of infinite importance and scope&mdash;even
+ though I <i>never</i> thought (except perhaps when the door of life was
+ just about to open ... before it opened) never thought it probable or
+ possible that I should have occasion for the exercise; from without
+ and from within at once. I have too much need to look up. For friends,
+ I can look any way ... round, and <i>down</i> even&mdash;the merest thread of a
+ sympathy will draw me sometimes&mdash;or even the least look of kind eyes
+ over a dyspathy&mdash;'Cela se peut facilement.' But for another
+ relation&mdash;it was all different&mdash;and rightly so&mdash;and so very
+ different&mdash;'Cela ne se peut nullement'&mdash;as in Malherbe.
+</p>
+<p>
+ And now we must agree to 'let all this be,', and set ourselves to get
+ as much good and enjoyment from the coming winter (better spent at
+ Pisa!) as we can&mdash;and I begin my joy by being glad that you are not
+ going since I am not going, and by being proud of these new green
+ leaves in your bay which came out with the new number. And then will
+ come the tragedies&mdash;and then, ... what beside? We shall have a happy
+ winter after all ... <i>I</i> shall at least; and if Pisa had been better,
+ London might be worse: and for <i>me</i> to grow pretentious and fastidious
+ and critical about various sorts of <i>purple</i> ... I, who have been used
+ to the <i>brun foncé</i> of Mme. de Sévigné, (<i>foncé</i> and <i>enfoncé</i>
+ ...)&mdash;would be too absurd. But why does not the proof come all this
+ time? I have kept this letter to go back with it.
+</p>
+<p>
+ I had a proposition from the New York booksellers about six weeks ago
+ (the booksellers who printed the poems) to let them re-print those
+ prose papers of mine in the <i>Athenæum</i>, with additional matter on
+ American literature, in a volume by itself&mdash;to be published at the
+ same time both in America and England by Wiley and Putnam in Waterloo
+ Place, and meaning to offer liberal terms, they said. Now what shall I
+ do? Those papers are not fit for separate publication, and I am not
+ inclined to the responsibility of them; and in any case, they must
+ give as much trouble as if they were re-written (trouble and not
+ poetry!), before I could consent to such a thing. Well!&mdash;and if I do
+ not ... these people are just as likely to print them without leave
+ ... and so without correction. What do you advise? What shall I do?
+ All this time they think me sublimely indifferent, they who pressed
+ for an answer by return of packet&mdash;and now it is past six ... eight
+ weeks; and I must say something.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Am I not 'femme qui parle' to-day? And let me talk on ever so, the
+ proof won't come. May God bless you&mdash;and me as I am
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">Yours,&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">E.B.B.
+</p>
+<p>
+ And the silent promise I would have you make is this&mdash;that if ever you
+ should leave me, it shall be (though you are not 'selfish') for your
+ sake&mdash;and not for mine: for your good, and not for mine. I ask it&mdash;not
+ because I am disinterested; but because one class of motives would be
+ valid, and the other void&mdash;simply for that reason.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Then the <i>femme qui parle</i> (looking back over the parlance) did not
+ mean to say on the first page of this letter that she was ever for a
+ moment <i>vexed in her pride</i> that she should owe anything to her
+ adversities. It was only because adversities are accidents and not
+ essentials. If it had been prosperities, it would have been the same
+ thing&mdash;no, not the same thing!&mdash;but far worse.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Occy is up to-day and doing well.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>R.B. to E.B.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">[Post-mark, October 27, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ How does one make 'silent promises' ... or, rather, how does the maker
+ of them communicate that fact to whomsoever it may concern? I know,
+ there have been many, very many unutterable vows and promises
+ made,&mdash;that is, <i>thought</i> down upon&mdash;the white slip at the top of my
+ notes,&mdash;such as of this note; and not trusted to the pen, that always
+ comes in for the shame,&mdash;but given up, and replaced by the poor forms
+ to which a pen is equal; and a glad minute I should account <i>that</i>, in
+ which you collected and accepted <i>those</i> 'promises'&mdash;because they
+ would not be all so unworthy of me&mdash;much less you! I would receive, in
+ virtue of <i>them</i>, the ascription of whatever worthiness is supposed to
+ lie in deep, truest love, and gratitude&mdash;
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: center">Read my silent answer there too!
+</p>
+<p>
+ All your letter is one comfort: we will be happy this winter, and
+ after, do not fear. I am most happy, to begin, that your brother is so
+ much better: he must be weak and susceptible of cold, remember.
+</p>
+<p>
+ It was on my lip, I do think, <i>last</i> visit, or the last but one, to
+ beg you to detach those papers from the <i>Athenæum's gâchis</i>. Certainly
+ this opportunity is <i>most</i> favourable, for every reason: you cannot
+ hesitate, surely. At present those papers are lost&mdash;<i>lost</i> for
+ practical purposes. Do pray reply without fail to the proposers; no,
+ no harm of these really fine fellows, who <i>could</i> do harm (by printing
+ incorrect copies, and perhaps eking out the column by suppositious
+ matter ... ex-gr. they strengthened and lengthened a book of Dickens',
+ in Paris, by adding quant. suff. of Thackeray's 'Yellowplush Papers'
+ ... as I discovered by a Parisian somebody praising the latter to me
+ as Dickens' best work!)&mdash;and who <i>do</i> really a good straightforward
+ un-American thing. You will encourage 'the day of small
+ things'&mdash;though this is not small, nor likely to have small results. I
+ shall be impatient to hear that you have decided. I like the progress
+ of these Americans in taste, their amazing leaps, like grasshoppers up
+ to the sun&mdash;from ... what is the '<i>from</i>,' what depth, do you
+ remember, say, ten or twelve years back?&mdash;<i>to</i>&mdash;Carlyle, and Tennyson,
+ and you! So children leave off Jack of Cornwall and go on just to
+ Homer.
+</p>
+<p>
+ I can't conceive why my proof does not come&mdash;I must go to-morrow and
+ see. In the other, I have corrected all the points you noted, to their
+ evident improvement. Yesterday I took out 'Luria' and read it
+ through&mdash;the skeleton&mdash;I shall hope to finish it soon now. It is for a
+ purely imaginary stage,&mdash;very simple and straightforward. Would you
+ ... no, Act by Act, as I was about to propose that you should read it;
+ that process would affect the oneness I most wish to preserve.
+</p>
+<p>
+ On Tuesday&mdash;at last, I am with you. Till when be with me ever,
+ dearest&mdash;God bless you ever&mdash;
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">R.B.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>R.B. to E.B.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Tuesday 9 a.m.<br>
+[In the same envelope with the preceding letter.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ I got this on coming home last night&mdash;have just run through it this
+ morning, and send it that time may not be lost. Faults, faults; but I
+ don't know how I have got tired of this. The Tragedies will be better,
+ at least the second&mdash;
+</p>
+<p>
+ At 3 this day! Bless you&mdash;
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">R.B.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>E.B.B. to R.B.</i> </h3>
+<p>
+ I write in haste, not to lose time about the proof. You will see on
+ the papers here my doubtfulnesses such as they are&mdash;but silence
+ swallows up the admirations ... and there is no time. 'Theocrite'
+ overtakes that wish of mine which ran on so fast&mdash;and the 'Duchess'
+ grows and grows the more I look&mdash;and 'Saul' is noble and must have his
+ full royalty some day. Would it not be well, by the way, to print it
+ in the meanwhile as a fragment confessed ... sowing asterisks at the
+ end. Because as a poem of yours it stands there and wants unity, and
+ people can't be expected to understand the difference between
+ incompleteness and defect, unless you make a sign. For the new
+ poems&mdash;they are full of beauty. You throw largesses out on all sides
+ without counting the coins: how beautiful that 'Night and Morning' ...
+ and the 'Earth's Immortalities' ... and the 'Song' too. And for your
+ 'Glove,' all women should be grateful,&mdash;and Ronsard, honoured, in
+ this fresh shower of music on his old grave ... though the chivalry of
+ the interpretation, as well as much beside, is so plainly yours, ...
+ could only be yours perhaps. And even <i>you</i> are forced to let in a
+ third person ... close to the doorway ... before you can do any good.
+ What a noble lion you give us too, with the 'flash on his forehead,'
+ and 'leagues in the desert already' as we look on him! And then, with
+ what a 'curious felicity' you turn the subject 'glove' to another use
+ and strike De Lorge's blow back on him with it, in the last paragraph
+ of your story! And the versification! And the lady's speech&mdash;(to
+ return!) so calm, and proud&mdash;yet a little bitter!
+</p>
+<p>
+ Am I not to thank you for all the pleasure and pride in these poems?
+ while you stand by and try to talk them down, perhaps.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Tell me how your mother is&mdash;tell me how you are ... you who never were
+ to be told twice about walking. Gone the way of all promises, is that
+ promise?
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">Ever yours,</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">E.B.B.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>R.B. to E.B.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Wednesday Night.<br>
+[Post-mark, October 30, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ Like your kindness&mdash;too, far too generous kindness,&mdash;all this trouble
+ and correcting,&mdash;and it is my proper office now, by this time, to sit
+ still and receive, by right <i>Human</i> (as opposed to Divine). When you
+ see the pamphlet's self, you will find your own doing,&mdash;but where will
+ you find the proofs of the best of all helping and counselling and
+ inciting, unless in new works which shall justify the
+ <i>unsatisfaction</i>, if I may not say shame, at these, these written
+ before your time, my best love?
+</p>
+<p>
+ Are you doing well to-day? For I feel well, have walked some eight or
+ nine miles&mdash;and my mother is very much better ... is singularly
+ better. You know whether you rejoiced me or no by that information
+ about the exercise <i>you</i> had taken yesterday. Think what telling one
+ that you grow stronger would mean!
+</p>
+<p>
+ 'Vexatious' with you! Ah, prudence is all very right, and one ought,
+ no doubt, to say, 'of course, we shall not expect a life exempt from
+ the usual proportion of &amp;c. &amp;c.&mdash;' but truth is still more right, and
+ includes the highest prudence besides, and I do believe that we shall
+ be happy; that is, that <i>you</i> will be happy: you see I dare
+ confidently expect <i>the</i> end to it all ... so it has always been with
+ me in my life of wonders&mdash;absolute wonders, with God's hand over
+ all.... And this last and best of all would never have begun so, and
+ gone on so, to break off abruptly even here, in this world, for the
+ little time.
+</p>
+<p>
+ So try, try, dearest, every method, take every measure of hastening
+ such a consummation. Why, we shall see Italy together! I could, would,
+ <i>will</i> shut myself in four walls of a room with you and never leave
+ you and be most of all <i>then</i> 'a lord of infinite space'&mdash;but, to
+ travel with you to Italy, or Greece. Very vain, I know that, all such
+ day dreaming! And ungrateful, too; with the real sufficing happiness
+ here of being, and knowing that you know me to be, and suffer me to
+ tell you I am yours, ever your own.
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">God bless you, my dearest&mdash;
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>E.B.B. to R.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">[Post-mark, November 1, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ All to-day, Friday, Miss Mitford has been here! She came at two and
+ went away at seven&mdash;and I feel as if I had been making a five-hour
+ speech on the corn laws in Harriet Martineau's parliament; ... so
+ tired I am. Not that dear Miss Mitford did not talk both for me and
+ herself, ... for that, of course she did. But I was forced to answer
+ once every ten minutes at least&mdash;and Flush, my usual companion, does
+ not exact so much&mdash;and so I am tired and come to rest myself on this
+ paper. Your name was not once spoken to-day; a little from my good
+ fencing: when I saw you at the end of an alley of associations, I
+ pushed the conversation up the next&mdash;because I was afraid of questions
+ such as every moment I expected, with a pair of woman's eyes behind
+ them; and those are worse than Mr. Kenyon's, when he puts on his
+ spectacles. So your name was not once spoken&mdash;not thought of, I do not
+ say&mdash;perhaps when I once lost her at Chevy Chase and found her
+ suddenly with Isidore the queen's hairdresser, my thoughts might have
+ wandered off to you and your unanswered letter while she passed
+ gradually from that to this&mdash;I am not sure of the contrary. And
+ Isidore, they say, reads Béranger, and is supposed to be the most
+ literary person at court&mdash;and wasn't at Chevy Chase one must needs
+ think.
+</p>
+<p>
+ One must needs write nonsense rather&mdash;for I have written it there. The
+ sense and the truth is, that your letter went to the bottom of my
+ heart, and that my thoughts have turned round it ever since and
+ through all the talking to-day. Yes indeed, dreams! But what <i>is</i> not
+ dreaming is this and this&mdash;this reading of these words&mdash;this proof of
+ this regard&mdash;all this that you are to me in fact, and which you cannot
+ guess the full meaning of, dramatic poet as you are ... cannot ...
+ since you do not know what my life meant before you touched it, ...
+ and my angel at the gate of the prison! My wonder is greater than your
+ wonders, ... I who sate here alone but yesterday, so weary of my own
+ being that to take interest in my very poems I had to lift them up by
+ an effort and separate them from myself and cast them out from me into
+ the sunshine where I was not&mdash;feeling nothing of the light which fell
+ on them even&mdash;making indeed a sort of pleasure and interest about that
+ factitious personality associated with them ... but knowing it to be
+ all far on the outside of <i>me</i> ... <i>myself</i> ... not seeming to touch
+ it with the end of my finger ... and receiving it as a mockery and a
+ bitterness when people persisted in confounding one with another.
+ Morbid it was if you like it&mdash;perhaps very morbid&mdash;but all these heaps
+ of letters which go into the fire one after the other, and which,
+ because I am a woman and have written verses, it seems so amusing to
+ the letter-writers of your sex to write and see 'what will come of
+ it,' ... some, from kind good motives I know, ... well, ... how could
+ it all make for me even such a narrow strip of sunshine as Flush finds
+ on the floor sometimes, and lays his nose along, with both ears out in
+ the shadow? It was not for <i>me</i> ... <i>me</i> ... in any way: it was not
+ within my reach&mdash;I did not seem to touch it as I said. Flush came
+ nearer, and I was grateful to him ... yes, grateful ... for not being
+ tired! I have felt grateful and flattered ... yes flattered ... when
+ he has chosen rather to stay with me all day than go down-stairs.
+ Grateful too, with reason, I have been and am to my own family for not
+ letting me see that I was a burthen. These are facts. And now how am I
+ to feel when you tell me what you have told me&mdash;and what you 'could
+ would and will' do, and <i>shall not</i> do?... but when you tell me?
+</p>
+<p>
+ Only remember that such words make you freer and freer&mdash;if you can be
+ freer than free&mdash;just as every one makes me happier and richer&mdash;too
+ rich by you, to claim any debt. May God bless you always. When I wrote
+ that letter to let you come the first time, do you know, the tears ran
+ down my cheeks.... I could not tell why: partly it might be mere
+ nervousness. And then, I was vexed with you for wishing to come as
+ other people did, and vexed with myself for not being able to refuse
+ you as I did them.
+</p>
+<p>
+ When does the book come out? Not on the first, I begin to be glad.
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">Ever yours,</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">E.B.B.
+</p>
+<p>
+ I trust that you go on to take exercise&mdash;and that your mother is still
+ better. Occy's worst symptom now is too great an appetite ... a
+ monster-appetite indeed.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>R.B. to E.B.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Tuesday.<br>
+[Post-mark, November 4, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ Only a word to tell you Moxon promises the books for to-morrow,
+ Wednesday&mdash;so towards evening yours will reach you&mdash;'parve liber, sine
+ me ibis' ... would I were by you, then and ever! You see, and know,
+ and understand why I can neither talk to you, nor write to you <i>now</i>,
+ as we are now;&mdash;from the beginning, the personal interest absorbed
+ every other, greater or smaller&mdash;but as one cannot well,&mdash;or should
+ not,&mdash;sit quite silently, the words go on, about Horne, or what
+ chances&mdash;while you are in my thought.
+</p>
+<p>
+ But when I have you ... so it seems ... <i>in</i> my very heart; when you
+ are entirely with me&mdash;oh, the day&mdash;then it will all go better, talk
+ and writing too.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Love me, my own love; not as I love you&mdash;not for&mdash;but I cannot write
+ that. Nor do I ask anything, with all your gifts here, except for the
+ luxury of asking. Withdraw nothing, then, dearest, from your
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">R.B.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>E.B.B. to R.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Wednesday.<br>
+[Post-mark, November 6, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ I had your note last night, and am waiting for the book to-day; a true
+ living breathing book, let the writer say of it what he will. Also
+ when it comes it won't certainly come 'sine te.' Which is my comfort.
+</p>
+<p>
+ And now&mdash;not to make any more fuss about a matter of simple
+ restitution&mdash;may I have my letter back?... I mean the letter which if
+ you did not destroy ... did not punish for its sins long and long ago
+ ... belongs to me&mdash;which, if destroyed, I must lose for my sins, ...
+ but, if undestroyed, which I may have back; may I not? is it not my
+ own? must I not?&mdash;that letter I was made to return and now turn to ask
+ for again in further expiation. Now do I ask humbly enough? And send
+ it at once, if undestroyed&mdash;do not wait till Saturday.
+</p>
+<p>
+ I have considered about Mr. Kenyon and it seems best, in the event of
+ a question or of a remark equivalent to a question, to confess to the
+ visits 'generally once a week' ... because he may hear, one, two,
+ three different ways, ... not to say the other reasons and Chaucer's
+ charge against 'doubleness.' I fear ... I fear that he (not Chaucer)
+ will wonder a little&mdash;and he has looked at me with scanning spectacles
+ already and talked of its being a mystery to him how you made your way
+ here; and <i>I</i>, who though I can <i>bespeak</i> self-command, have no sort
+ of presence of mind (not so much as one would use to play at Jack
+ straws) did not help the case at all. Well&mdash;it cannot be helped. Did I
+ ever tell you what he said of you once&mdash;'<i>that you deserved to be a
+ poet</i>&mdash;being one in your heart and life:' he said <i>that</i> of you to me,
+ and I thought it a noble encomium and deserving its application.
+</p>
+<p>
+ For the rest ... yes: you know I do&mdash;God knows I do. Whatever I can
+ feel is for you&mdash;and perhaps it is not less, for not being simmered
+ away in too much sunshine as with women accounted happier. <i>I</i> am
+ happy besides now&mdash;happy enough to die now.
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">May God bless you, dear&mdash;dearest&mdash;</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">Ever I am yours&mdash;
+</p>
+<p>
+ The book does not come&mdash;so I shall not wait. Mr. Kenyon came instead,
+ and comes again on <i>Friday</i> he says, and Saturday seems to be clear
+ still.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>R.B. to E.B.B.</i> </h3>
+<p>
+ <i>Just</i> arrived!&mdash;(mind, the <i>silent writing</i> overflows the page, and
+ laughs at the black words for Mr. Kenyon to read!)&mdash;But your note
+ arrived earlier&mdash;more of that, when I write after this dreadful
+ dispatching-business that falls on me&mdash;friend A. and B. and C. must
+ get their copy, and word of regard, all by next post!&mdash;
+</p>
+<p>
+ <a name="268"></a>Could you think <i>that</i> that untoward letter lived one <i>moment</i> after
+ it returned to me? I burned it and cried 'serve it right'! Poor
+ letter,&mdash;yet I should have been vexed and offended <i>then</i> to be told I
+ <i>could</i> love you better than I did already. 'Live and <i>learn</i>!' Live
+ and love you&mdash;dearest, as loves you
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">R.B.
+</p>
+<p>
+ You will write to reassure me about Saturday, if not for other
+ reasons. See your corrections ... and understand that in one or two
+ instances in which they would seem not to be adopted, they <i>are</i> so,
+ by some modification of the previous, or following line ... as in one
+ of the Sorrento lines ... about a 'turret'&mdash;see! (Can you give me
+ Horne's address&mdash;I would send then.)
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>E.B.B. to R.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Thursday Evening.<br>
+[Post-mark, November 7, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ I see and know; read and mark; and only hope there is no harm done by
+ my meddling; and lose the sense of it all in the sense of beauty and
+ power everywhere, which nobody could kill, if they took to meddling
+ more even. And now, what will people say to this and this and this&mdash;or
+ 'O seclum insipiens et inficetum!' or rather, O ungrateful right hand
+ which does not thank you first! I do thank you. I have been reading
+ everything with new delight; and at intervals remembering in
+ inglorious complacency (for which you must try to forgive me) that Mr.
+ Forster is no longer anything like an enemy. And yet (just see what
+ contradiction!) the <i>British Quarterly</i> has been abusing me so at
+ large, that I can only take it to be the achievement of a very
+ particular friend indeed,&mdash;of someone who positively never reviewed
+ before and tries his new sword on me out of pure friendship. Only I
+ suppose it is not the general rule, and that there are friends 'with a
+ difference.' Not that you are to fancy me pained&mdash;oh no!&mdash;merely
+ surprised. I was prepared for anything almost from the quarter in
+ question, but scarcely for being hung 'to the crows' so publicly ...
+ though within the bounds of legitimate criticisms, mind. But oh&mdash;the
+ creatures of your sex are not always magnanimous&mdash;<i>that</i> is true. And
+ to put <i>you</i> between me and all ... the thought of <i>you</i> ... in a
+ great eclipse of the world ... <i>that</i> is happy ... only, too happy for
+ such as I am; as my own heart warns me hour by hour.
+</p>
+<p>
+ 'Serve <i>me</i> right'&mdash;I do not dare to complain. I wished for the safety
+ of that letter so much that I finished by persuading myself of the
+ probability of it: but 'serve <i>me</i> right' quite clearly. And yet&mdash;but
+ no more 'and yets' about it. 'And yets' fray the silk.
+</p>
+<p>
+ I see how the 'turret' stands in the new reading, triumphing over the
+ 'tower,' and unexceptionable in every respect. Also I do hold that
+ nobody with an ordinary understanding has the slightest pretence for
+ attaching a charge of obscurity to this new number&mdash;there are lights
+ enough for the critics to scan one another's dull blank of visage by.
+ One verse indeed in that expressive lyric of the 'Lost Mistress,' does
+ still seem questionable to me, though you have changed a word since I
+ saw it; and still I fancy that I rather leap at the meaning than reach
+ it&mdash;but it is my own fault probably ... I am not sure. With that one
+ exception I <i>am quite</i> sure that people who shall complain of darkness
+ are blind ... I mean, that the construction is clear and unembarrassed
+ everywhere. Subtleties of thought which are not directly apprehensible
+ by minds of a common range, are here as elsewhere in your
+ writings&mdash;but if to utter things 'hard to understand' from <i>that</i>
+ cause be an offence, why we may begin with 'our beloved brother Paul,'
+ you know, and go down through all the geniuses of the world, and bid
+ them put away their inspirations. You must descend to the level of
+ critic A or B, that he may look into your face.... Ah well!&mdash;'Let them
+ rave.' You will live when all <i>those</i> are under the willows. In the
+ meantime there is something better, as you said, even than your
+ poetry&mdash;as the giver is better than the gift, and the maker than the
+ creature, and <i>you</i> than <i>yours</i>. Yes&mdash;<i>you</i> than <i>yours</i>.... (I did
+ not mean it so when I wrote it first ... but I accept the 'bona
+ verba,' and use the phrase for the end of my letter) ... as <i>you</i> are
+ better than <i>yours</i>; even when so much yours as your own
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">E.B.B.
+</p>
+<p>
+ May I see the first act first? Let me!&mdash;And you walk?
+</p>
+<p>
+ Mr. Horne's address is Hill Side, Fitzroy Park, Highgate.
+</p>
+<p>
+ There is no reason against Saturday so far. Mr. Kenyon comes
+ to-morrow, Friday, and therefore&mdash;!&mdash;and if Saturday should become
+ impracticable, I will write again.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i><a name="270">R.B. to E.B.B.</a></i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Sunday Evening.<br>
+[Post-mark, November 10, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ When I come back from seeing you, and think over it all, there never
+ is a least word of yours I could not occupy myself with, and wish to
+ return to you with some ... not to say, all ... the thoughts and
+ fancies it is sure to call out of me. There is nothing in you that
+ does not draw out all of me. You possess me, dearest ... and there is
+ no help for the expressing it all, no voice nor hand, but these of
+ mine which shrink and turn away from the attempt. So you must go on,
+ patiently, knowing me more and more, and your entire power on me, and
+ I will console myself, to the full extent, with your
+ knowledge&mdash;penetration, intuition&mdash;<i>somehow</i> I must believe you can
+ get to what is here, in me, without the pretence of my telling or
+ writing it. But, because I give up the great achievements, there is no
+ reason I should not secure any occasion of making clear one of the
+ less important points that arise in our intercourse ... if I fancy I
+ can do it with the least success. For instance, it is on my mind to
+ explain what I meant yesterday by trusting that the entire happiness I
+ feel in the letters, and the help in the criticising might not be hurt
+ by the surmise, even, that those labours to which you were born, might
+ be suspended, in any degree, through such generosity to <i>me</i>. Dearest,
+ I believed in your glorious genius and knew it for a true star from
+ the moment I saw it; long before I had the blessing of knowing it was
+ <SPAN class="sc-ex">my</span> star, with my fortune and futurity in it. And, when I draw back
+ from myself, and look better and more clearly, then I <i>do</i> feel, with
+ you, that the writing a few letters more or less, reading many or few
+ rhymes of any other person, would not interfere in any material degree
+ with that power of yours&mdash;that you might easily make one so happy and
+ yet go on writing 'Geraldines' and 'Berthas'&mdash;but&mdash;how can I, dearest,
+ leave my heart's treasures long, even to look at your genius?... and
+ when I come back and find all safe, find the comfort of you, the
+ traces of you ... <i>will</i> it do&mdash;tell me&mdash;to trust all that as a light
+ effort, an easy matter?
+</p>
+<p>
+ Yet, if you can lift me with one hand, while the other suffices to
+ crown you&mdash;there is queenliness in <i>that</i>, too!
+</p>
+<p>
+ Well, I have spoken. As I told you, your turn comes now. How have you
+ determined respecting the American Edition? You tell me nothing of
+ yourself! It is all <SPAN class="sc-ex">me</span> you help, me you do good to ... and I take it
+ all! Now see, if this goes on! I have not had <i>every</i> love-luxury, I
+ now find out ... where is the proper, rationally
+ to-be-expected&mdash;'<i>lovers' quarrel</i>'? <i>Here</i>, as you will find! 'Iræ;
+ amantium'.... I am no more 'at a loss with my Naso,' than Peter
+ Ronsard. Ah, but then they are to be <i>reintegratio amoris</i>&mdash;and to get
+ back into a thing, one must needs get for a moment first out of it ...
+ trust me, no! And now, the natural inference from all this? The
+ consistent inference ... the 'self-denying ordinance'? Why&mdash;do you
+ doubt? even this,&mdash;you must just put aside the Romance, and tell the
+ Americans to wait, and make my heart start up when the letter is laid
+ to it; the letter full of your news, telling me you are well and
+ walking, and working for my sake towards <i>the time</i>&mdash;informing me,
+ moreover, if Thursday or Friday is to be my day&mdash;.
+</p>
+<p>
+ May God bless you, my own love.
+</p>
+<p>
+ I will certainly bring you an Act of the Play ... for this serpent's
+ reason, in addition to the others ... that&mdash;No, I will <i>tell</i> you
+ that&mdash;I can tell you now more than even lately!
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">Ever your own</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">R.B.
+</p>
+<br>
+<hr>
+<br>
+<a name="image-0004"><!--IMG--></a>
+<center>
+<img src="images/image02.png" width="554" height="800"
+alt="Facsimile of Letter of Robert Browning, Nov. 10, 1845">
+</center>
+<!--IMAGE END-->
+<br>
+
+<center>
+<img src="images/image03.png" width="541" height="800"
+alt="Page 2 of Letter">
+</center>
+<!--IMAGE END-->
+<br>
+
+<center>
+<img src="images/image04.png" width="622" height="800"
+alt="Page 3 of Letter">
+</center>
+<!--IMAGE END-->
+<br>
+
+<center>
+<img src="images/image05.png" width="554" height="642"
+alt="Envelope">
+</center>
+<!--IMAGE END-->
+<br>
+<br>
+
+
+<p style="text-align: center">
+
+<b>Facsimile of Letter of Robert Browning</b></p>
+<p style="text-align: center">
+
+<a href="#270">(See Vol. I., p. 270)</a>
+</p>
+<br>
+<hr>
+<br>
+<h3>
+ <i>E.B.B. to R.B.</i>
+</h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Monday.<br>
+[Post-mark, November 11, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ If it were possible that you could do me harm in the way of work, (but
+ it isn't) it would be possible, not through writing letters and
+ reading manuscripts, but because of a reason to be drawn from your own
+ great line
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: center">What man is strong until he stands alone?
+</p>
+<p style="text-indent: 0em">What man ... what woman? For have I not felt twenty times the desolate
+ advantage of being insulated here and of not minding anybody when I
+ made my poems?&mdash;of living a little like a disembodied spirit, and
+ caring less for suppositious criticism than for the black fly buzzing
+ in the pane?&mdash;<i>That</i> made me what dear Mr. Kenyon calls
+ 'insolent,'&mdash;untimid, and unconventional in my degree; and not so much
+ by strength, you see, as by separation. <i>You</i> touch your greater ends
+ by mere strength; breaking with your own hands the hampering threads
+ which, in your position would have hampered <i>me</i>.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Still ... when all is changed for me now, and different, it is not
+ possible, ... for all the changing, nor for all your line and my
+ speculation, ... that I should not be better and stronger for being
+ within your influences and sympathies, in this way of writing as in
+ other ways. We shall see&mdash;you will see. Yet I have been idle lately I
+ confess; leaning half out of some turret-window of the castle of
+ Indolence and watching the new sunrise&mdash;as why not?&mdash;Do I mean to be
+ idle always?&mdash;no!&mdash;and am I not an industrious worker on the average
+ of days? Indeed yes! Also I have been less idle than you think
+ perhaps, even this last year, though the results seem so like
+ trifling: and I shall set about the prose papers for the New York
+ people, and the something rather better besides we may hope ... may
+ <i>I</i> not hope, if <i>you</i> wish it? Only there is no 'crown' for me, be
+ sure, except what grows from this letter and such letters ... this
+ sense of being anything to <i>one</i>! there is no room for another crown.
+ Have I a great head like Goethe's that there should be room? and mine
+ is bent down already by the unused weight&mdash;and as to bearing it, ...
+ 'Will it do,&mdash;tell me; to treat <i>that</i> as a light effort, an easy
+ matter?'
+</p>
+<p>
+ Now let me remember to tell you that the line of yours I have just
+ quoted, and which has been present with me since you wrote it, Mr.
+ Chorley has quoted too in his new novel of 'Pomfret.' You were right
+ in your identifying of servant and waistcoat&mdash;and Wilson waited only
+ till you had gone on Saturday, to give me a parcel and note; the novel
+ itself in fact, which Mr. Chorley had the kindness to send me 'some
+ days or weeks,' said the note, 'previous to the publication.' Very
+ goodnatured of him certainly: and the book seems to me his best work
+ in point of sustainment and vigour, and I am in process of being
+ interested in it. Not that he is a <i>maker</i>, even for this prose. A
+ feeler ... an observer ... a thinker even, in a certain sphere&mdash;but a
+ maker ... no, as it seems to me&mdash;and if I were he, I would rather herd
+ with the essayists than the novelists where he is too good to take
+ inferior rank and not strong enough to 'go up higher.' Only it would
+ be more right in me to be grateful than to talk so&mdash;now wouldn't it?
+</p>
+<p>
+ And here is Mr. Kenyon's letter back again&mdash;a kind good letter ... a
+ letter I have liked to read (so it was kind and good in you to let
+ me!)&mdash;and he was with me to-day and praising the 'Ride to Ghent,' and
+ praising the 'Duchess,' and praising you altogether as I liked to hear
+ him. The Ghent-ride was 'very fine'&mdash;and the
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: center">Into the midnight they galloped abreast
+</p>
+<p style="text-indent: 0em">drew us out into the night as witnesses. And then, the 'Duchess' ...
+ the conception of it was noble, and the vehicle, rhythm and all, most
+ characteristic and individual ... though some of the rhymes ... oh,
+ some of the rhymes did not find grace in his ears&mdash;but the
+ incantation-scene, 'just trenching on the supernatural,' <i>that</i> was
+ taken to be 'wonderful,' ... 'showing extraordinary power, ... as
+ indeed other things did ... works of a highly original writer and of
+ such various faculty!'&mdash;Am I not tired of writing your praises as he
+ said then? So I shall tell you, instead of any more, that I went down
+ to the drawing-room yesterday (because it was warm enough) by an act
+ of supererogatory virtue for which you may praise <i>me</i> in turn. What
+ weather it is! and how the year seems to have forgotten itself into
+ April.
+</p>
+<p>
+ But after all, how have I answered your letter? and how <i>are</i> such
+ letters to be answered? Do we answer the sun when he shines? May God
+ bless you ... it is my answer&mdash;with one word besides ... that I am
+ wholly and ever your
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">E.B.B.
+</p>
+<p>
+ On Thursday as far as I know yet&mdash;and you shall hear if there should
+ be an obstacle. <i>Will you walk?</i> If you will not, you know, you must
+ be forgetting me a little. Will you remember me too in the act of the
+ play?&mdash;but above all things in taking the right exercise, and in not
+ overworking the head. And this for no serpent's reason.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>E.B.B. to R.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Two letters in one&mdash;Wednesday.<br>
+[Post-mark, November 15, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ I shall see you to-morrow and yet am writing what you will have to
+ read perhaps. When you spoke of 'stars' and 'geniuses' in that letter,
+ I did not seem to hear; I was listening to those words of the letter
+ which were of a better silver in the sound than even your praise could
+ be; and now that at last I come to hear them in their extravagance (oh
+ such pure extravagance about 'glorious geniuses'&mdash;) I can't help
+ telling you they were heard last, and deserved it.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Shall I tell you besides?&mdash;The first moment in which I seemed to admit
+ to myself in a flash of lightning the <i>possibility</i> of your affection
+ for me being more than dream-work ... the first moment was <i>that</i> when
+ you intimated (as you have done since repeatedly) that you cared for
+ me not for a reason, but because you cared for me. Now such a
+ 'parceque' which reasonable people would take to be irrational, was
+ just the only one fitted to the uses of my understanding on the
+ particular question we were upon ... just the 'woman's reason'
+ suitable to the woman ...; for I could understand that it might be as
+ you said, and, if so, that it was altogether unanswerable ... do you
+ see? If a fact includes its own cause ... why there it stands for
+ ever&mdash;one of 'earth's immortalities'&mdash;<i>as long as it includes it</i>.
+</p>
+<p>
+ And when unreasonableness stands for a reason, it is a promising state
+ of things, we may both admit, and proves what it would be as well not
+ too curiously to enquire into. But then ... to look at it in a
+ brighter aspect, ... I do remember how, years ago, when talking the
+ foolishnesses which women will talk when they are by themselves, and
+ not forced to be sensible, ... one of my friends thought it 'safest to
+ begin with a little aversion,' and another, wisest to begin with a
+ great deal of esteem, and how the best attachments were produced so
+ and so, ... I took it into my head to say that the best was where
+ there was no cause at all for it, and the more wholly unreasonable,
+ the better still; that the motive should lie in the feeling itself and
+ not in the object of it&mdash;and that the affection which could (if it
+ could) throw itself out on an idiot with a goître would be more
+ admirable than Abelard's. Whereupon everybody laughed, and someone
+ thought it affected of me and no true opinion, and others said plainly
+ that it was immoral, and somebody else hoped, in a sarcasm, that I
+ meant to act out my theory for the advantage of the world. To which I
+ replied quite gravely that I had not virtue enough&mdash;and so, people
+ laughed as it is fair to laugh when other people are esteemed to talk
+ nonsense. And all this came back to me in the south wind of your
+ 'parceque,' and I tell it as it came ... now.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Which proves, if it proves anything, ... while I have every sort of
+ natural pleasure in your praises and like you to like my poetry just
+ as I should, and perhaps more than I should; yet <i>why</i> it is all
+ behind ... and in its place&mdash;and <i>why</i> I have a tendency moreover to
+ sift and measure any praise of yours and to separate it from the
+ superfluities, far more than with any other person's praise in the
+ world.
+</p>
+<p>
+ <i>Friday evening.</i>&mdash;Shall I send this letter or not? I have been 'tra
+ 'l si e 'l no,' and writing a new beginning on a new sheet even&mdash;but
+ after all you ought to hear the remote echo of your last letter ...
+ far out among the hills, ... as well as the immediate reverberation,
+ and so I will send it,&mdash;and what I send is not to be answered,
+ remember!
+</p>
+<p>
+ I read Luria's first act twice through before I slept last night, and
+ feel just as a bullet might feel, not because of the lead of it but
+ because shot into the air and suddenly arrested and suspended. It
+ ('Luria') is all life, and we know (that is, the reader knows) that
+ there must be results here and here. How fine that sight of Luria is
+ upon the lynx hides&mdash;how you see the Moor in him just in the glimpse
+ you have by the eyes of another&mdash;and that laugh when the horse drops
+ the forage, what wonderful truth and character you have in
+ <i>that</i>!&mdash;And then, when <i>he</i> is in the scene&mdash;: 'Golden-hearted Luria'
+ you called him once to me, and his heart shines already ... wide open
+ to the morning sun. The construction seems to me very clear
+ everywhere&mdash;and the rhythm, even over-smooth in a few verses, where
+ you invert a little artificially&mdash;but that shall be set down on a
+ separate strip of paper: and in the meantime I am snatched up into
+ 'Luria' and feel myself driven on to the ends of the poet, just as a
+ reader should.
+</p>
+<p>
+ But <i>you</i> are not driven on to any ends? so as to be tired, I mean?
+ You will not suffer yourself to be overworked because you are
+ 'interested' in this work. I am so certain that the sensations in your
+ head <i>demand</i> repose; and it must be so injurious to you to be
+ perpetually calling, calling these new creations, one after another,
+ that you must consent to be called <i>to</i>, and not hurry the next act,
+ no, nor any act&mdash;let the people have time to learn the last number by
+ heart. And how glad I am that Mr. Fox should say what he did of it ...
+ though it wasn't true, you know ... not exactly. Still, I do hold that
+ as far as construction goes, you never put together so much
+ unquestionable, smooth glory before, ... not a single entanglement for
+ the understanding ... unless 'the snowdrops' make an exception&mdash;while
+ for the undeniableness of genius it never stood out before your
+ readers more plainly than in that same number! Also you have extended
+ your sweep of power&mdash;the sea-weed is thrown farther (if not higher)
+ than it was found before; and one may calculate surely now how a few
+ more waves will cover the brown stones and float the sight up away
+ through the fissure of the rocks. The rhythm (to touch one of the
+ various things) the rhythm of that 'Duchess' does more and more strike
+ me as a new thing; something like (if like anything) what the Greeks
+ called pedestrian-metre, ... between metre and prose ... the difficult
+ rhymes combining too quite curiously with the easy looseness of the
+ general measure. Then 'The Ride'&mdash;with that touch of natural feeling
+ at the end, to prove that it was not in brutal carelessness that the
+ poor horse was driven through all that suffering ... yes, and how that
+ one touch of softness acts back upon the energy and resolution and
+ exalts both, instead of weakening anything, as might have been
+ expected by the vulgar of writers or critics. And then 'Saul'&mdash;and in
+ a first place 'St. Praxed'&mdash;and for pure description, 'Fortú' and the
+ deep 'Pictor Ignotus'&mdash;and the noble, serene 'Italy in England,' which
+ grows on you the more you know of it&mdash;and that delightful 'Glove'&mdash;and
+ the short lyrics ... for one comes to <i>'select' everything</i> at last,
+ and certainly I do like these poems better and better, as your poems
+ are made to be liked. But you will be tired to hear it said over and
+ over so, ... and I am going to 'Luria,' besides.
+</p>
+<p>
+ When you write will you say exactly how you are? and will you write?
+ And I want to explain to you that although I don't make a profession
+ of equable spirits, (as a matter of temperament, my spirits were
+ always given to rock a little, up and down) yet that I did not mean to
+ be so ungrateful and wicked as to complain of low spirits now and to
+ you. It would not be true either: and I said 'low' to express a merely
+ bodily state. My opium comes in to keep the pulse from fluttering and
+ fainting ... to give the right composure and point of balance to the
+ nervous system. I don't take it for 'my spirits' in the usual sense;
+ you must not think such a thing. The medical man who came to see me
+ made me take it the other day when he was in the room, before the
+ right hour and when I was talking quite cheerfully, just for the need
+ he observed in the pulse. 'It was a necessity of my position,' he
+ said. Also I do not suffer from it in any way, as people usually do
+ who take opium. I am not even subject to an opium-headache. As to the
+ low spirits I will not say that mine <i>have not</i> been low enough and
+ with cause enough; but <i>even then</i>, ... why if you were to ask the
+ nearest witnesses, ... say, even my own sisters, ... everybody would
+ tell you, I think, that the 'cheerfulness' even <i>then</i>, was the
+ remarkable thing in me&mdash;certainly it has been remarked about me again
+ and again. Nobody has known that it was an effort (a habit of effort)
+ to throw the light on the outside,&mdash;I do abhor so that ignoble
+ groaning aloud of the 'groans of Testy and Sensitude'&mdash;yet I may say
+ that for three years I never was conscious of one movement of pleasure
+ in anything. Think if I could mean to complain of 'low spirits' now,
+ and to you. Why it would be like complaining of not being able to see
+ at noon&mdash;which would simply prove that I was very blind. And you, who
+ are not blind, cannot make out what is written&mdash;so you <i>need not try</i>.
+ May God bless you long after you have done blessing me!
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">Your own&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">E.B.B.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Now I am half tempted to tear this letter in two (and it is long
+ enough for three) and to send you only the latter half. But you will
+ understand&mdash;you will not think that there is a contradiction between
+ the first and last ... you <i>cannot</i>. One is a truth of me&mdash;and the
+ other a truth of you&mdash;and we two are different, you know.
+</p>
+<p>
+ You are not over-working in 'Luria'? That you <i>should not</i>, is a
+ truth, too.
+</p>
+<p>
+ I observed that Mr. Kenyon put in '<i>Junior</i>' to your address. Ought
+ that to be done? or does my fashion of directing find you without
+ hesitation?
+</p>
+<p>
+ Mr. Kenyon asked me for Mr. Chorley's book, or you should have it.
+ Shall I send it to you presently?
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>R.B. to E.B.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Sunday Morning.<br>
+[Post-mark, November 17, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ At last your letter comes&mdash;and the deep joy&mdash;(I know and use to
+ analyse my own feelings, and be sober in giving distinctive names to
+ their varieties; this is <i>deep</i> joy,)&mdash;the true love with which I
+ take this much of you into my heart, ... <i>that</i> proves what it is I
+ wanted so long, and find at last, and am happy for ever. I must have
+ more than 'intimated'&mdash;I must have spoken plainly out the truth, if I
+ do myself the barest justice, and told you long ago that the
+ admiration at your works went <i>away</i>, quite another way and afar from
+ the love of you. If I could fancy some method of what I shall say
+ happening without all the obvious stumbling-blocks of falseness, &amp;c.
+ which no foolish fancy dares associate with you ... if you <SPAN class="sc-ex">could</span> tell
+ me when I next sit by you&mdash;'I will undeceive you,&mdash;I am not <i>the</i> Miss
+ B.&mdash;she is up-stairs and you shall see her&mdash;I only wrote those
+ letters, and am what you see, that is all now left you' (all the
+ misapprehension having arisen from <i>me</i>, in some inexplicable way) ...
+ I should not begin by <i>saying</i> anything, dear, dearest&mdash;but <i>after
+ that</i>, I should assure you&mdash;soon make you believe that I did not much
+ wonder at the event, for I have been all my life asking what
+ connection there is between the satisfaction at the display of power,
+ and the sympathy with&mdash;ever-increasing sympathy with&mdash;all imaginable
+ weakness? Look now: Coleridge writes on and on,&mdash;at last he writes a
+ note to his 'War-Eclogue,' in which he avers himself to have been
+ actuated by a really&mdash;on the whole&mdash;<i>benevolent</i> feeling to Mr. Pitt
+ when he wrote that stanza in which 'Fire' means to 'cling to him
+ everlastingly'&mdash;where is the long line of admiration now that the end
+ snaps? And now&mdash;here I refuse to fancy&mdash;you <SPAN class="sc-ex">know</span> whether, if you never
+ write another line, speak another intelligible word, recognize me by a
+ look again&mdash;whether I shall love you less or <i>more</i> ... <SPAN class="sc-ex">more</span>; having a
+ right to expect more strength with the strange emergency. And it is
+ because I know this, build upon this entirely, that as a reasonable
+ creature, I am bound to look first to what hangs farthest and most
+ loosely from me ... what <i>might</i> go from you to your loss, and so to
+ mine, to say the least ... because I want <SPAN class="sc-ex">all</span> of you, not just so much
+ as I could not live without&mdash;and because I see the danger of your
+ entirely generous disposition and cannot quite, yet, bring myself to
+ profit by it in the quiet way you recommend. Always remember, I never
+ wrote to you, all the years, on the strength of your poetry, though I
+ constantly heard of you through Mr. K. and was near seeing you once,
+ and might have easily availed myself of his intervention to commend
+ any letter to your notice, so as to reach you out of the foolish crowd
+ of rushers-in upon genius ... who come and eat their bread and cheese
+ on the high-altar, and talk of reverence without one of its surest
+ instincts&mdash;never quiet till they cut their initials on the cheek of
+ the Medicean Venus to prove they worship her. My admiration, as I
+ said, went its natural way in silence&mdash;but when on my return to
+ England in December, late in the month, Mr. K. sent those Poems to my
+ sister, and I read my name there&mdash;and when, a day or two after, I met
+ him and, beginning to speak my mind on them, and getting on no better
+ than I should now, said quite naturally&mdash;'if I were to <i>write</i> this,
+ now?'&mdash;and he assured me with his perfect kindness, you would be even
+ 'pleased' to hear from me under those circumstances ... nay,&mdash;for I
+ will tell you all, in this, in everything&mdash;when he wrote me a note
+ soon after to reassure me on that point ... <SPAN class="sc-ex">then</span> I <i>did</i> write, on
+ <i>account of my purely personal obligation</i>, though of course taking
+ that occasion to allude to the general and customary delight in your
+ works: I did write, on the whole, <SPAN class="sc-ex">unwillingly</span> ... with consciousness
+ of having to <i>speak</i> on a subject which I <i>felt</i> thoroughly
+ concerning, and could not be satisfied with an imperfect expression
+ of. As for expecting <SPAN class="sc-ex">then</span> what has followed ... I shall only say I was
+ scheming how to get done with England and go to my heart in Italy. And
+ now, my love&mdash;I am round you ... my whole life is wound up and down
+ and over you.... I feel you stir everywhere. I am not conscious of
+ thinking or feeling but <i>about</i> you, with some reference to you&mdash;so I
+ will live, so may I die! And you have blessed me <i>beyond</i> the <i>bond</i>,
+ in more than in giving me yourself to love; inasmuch as you believed
+ me from the first ... what you call 'dream-work' <i>was</i> real of its
+ kind, did you not think? and now you believe me, <i>I</i> believe and am
+ happy, in what I write with my heart full of love for you. Why do you
+ tell me of a doubt, as now, and bid me not clear it up, 'not answer
+ you?' Have I done wrong in thus answering? Never, never do <i>me</i> direct
+ <i>wrong</i> and hide for a moment from me what a word can explain as now.
+ You see, you thought, if but for a moment, I loved your intellect&mdash;or
+ what predominates in your poetry and is most distinct from your
+ heart&mdash;better, or as well as you&mdash;did you not? and I have told you
+ every thing,&mdash;explained everything ... have I not? And now I will dare
+ ... yes, dearest, kiss you back to my heart again; my own. There&mdash;and
+ there!
+</p>
+<p>
+ And since I wrote what is above, I have been reading among other poems
+ that sonnet&mdash;'Past and Future'&mdash;which affects me more than any poem I
+ ever read. How can I put your poetry away from you, even in these
+ ineffectual attempts to concentrate myself upon, and better apply
+ myself to what remains?&mdash;poor, poor work it is; for is not that sonnet
+ to be loved as a true utterance of yours? I cannot attempt to put down
+ the thoughts that rise; may God bless me, as you pray, by letting that
+ beloved hand shake the less ... I will only ask, <i>the less</i> ... for
+ being laid on mine through this life! And, indeed, you write down, for
+ me to calmly read, that I make you happy! Then it is&mdash;as with all
+ power&mdash;God through the weakest instrumentality ... and I am past
+ expression proud and grateful&mdash;My love,
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">I am your</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">R.B.
+</p>
+<p>
+ I must answer your questions: I am better&mdash;and will certainly have
+ your injunction before my eyes and work quite moderately. Your letters
+ come <i>straight</i> to me&mdash;my father's go to Town, except on extraordinary
+ occasions, so that <i>all</i> come for my first looking-over. I saw Mr. K.
+ last night at the Amateur Comedy&mdash;and heaps of old acquaintances&mdash;and
+ came home tired and savage&mdash;and <i>yearned</i> literally, for a letter this
+ morning, and so it came and I was well again. So, I am not even to
+ have your low spirits leaning on mine? It was just because I always
+ find you alike, and <i>ever</i> like yourself, that I seemed to discern a
+ depth, when you spoke of 'some days' and what they made uneven where
+ all is agreeable to <i>me</i>. Do not, now, deprive me of a right&mdash;a right
+ ... to find you as you <i>are</i>; get no habit of being cheerful with
+ me&mdash;I have universal sympathy and can show you a <SPAN class="sc-ex">side</span> of me, a true
+ face, turn as you may. If you <i>are</i> cheerful ... so will I be ... if
+ sad, my cheerfulness will be all the while <i>behind</i>, and propping up,
+ any sadness that meets yours, if that should be necessary. As for my
+ question about the opium ... you do not misunderstand <i>that</i> neither:
+ I trust in the eventual consummation of my&mdash;shall I not say,
+ <i>our</i>&mdash;hopes; and all that bears upon your health immediately or
+ prospectively, affects me&mdash;how it affects me! Will you write again?
+ <i>Wednesday</i>, remember! Mr. K. wants me to go to him one of the three
+ next days after. I will bring you some letters ... one from Landor.
+ Why should I trouble you about 'Pomfret.'
+</p>
+<p>
+ And Luria ... does it so interest you? Better is to come of it. How
+ you lift me up!&mdash;
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>E.B.B. to R.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Monday.<br>
+[Post-mark, November 18, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ How you overcome me as always you do&mdash;and where is the answer to
+ anything except too deep down in the heart for even the pearl-divers?
+ But understand ... what you do not quite ... that I did not mistake
+ you as far even as you say here and even 'for a moment.' I did not
+ write any of that letter in a 'doubt' of you&mdash;not a word.... I was
+ simply looking back in it on my own states of feeling, ... looking
+ back from that point of your praise to what was better ... (or I
+ should not have looked back)&mdash;and so coming to tell you, by a natural
+ association, how the completely opposite point to that of any praise
+ was the one which struck me first and most, viz. the no-reason of your
+ reasoning ... acknowledged to be yours. Of course I acknowledge it to
+ be yours, ... that high reason of no reason&mdash;I acknowledged it to be
+ yours (didn't I?) in acknowledging that it made an impression on me.
+ And then, referring to the traditions of my experience such as I told
+ them to you, I meant, so, farther to acknowledge that I would rather
+ be cared for in <i>that</i> unreasonable way, than for the best reason in
+ the world. But all <i>that</i> was history and philosophy simply&mdash;was it
+ not?&mdash;and not <i>doubt of you</i>.
+</p>
+<p>
+ The truth is ... since we really are talking truths in this world ...
+ that I never have doubted you&mdash;ah, you <i>know</i>!&mdash;I felt from the
+ beginning so sure of the nobility and integrity in you that I would
+ have trusted you to make a path for my soul&mdash;<i>that</i>, you <i>know</i>. I
+ felt certain that you believed of yourself every word you spoke or
+ wrote&mdash;and you must not blame me if I thought besides sometimes (it
+ was the extent of my thought) that you were self-deceived as to the
+ nature of your own feelings. If you could turn over every page of my
+ heart like the pages of a book, you would see nothing there offensive
+ to the least of your feelings ... not even to the outside fringes of
+ your man's vanity ... should you have any vanity like a man; which I
+ <i>do</i> doubt. I never wronged you in the least of things&mdash;never ... I
+ thank God for it. But 'self-deceived,' it was so easy for you to be:
+ see how on every side and day by day, men are&mdash;and women too&mdash;in this
+ sort of feelings. 'Self-deceived,' it was so possible for you to be,
+ and while I thought it possible, could I help thinking it <i>best</i> for
+ you that it should be so&mdash;and was it not right in me to persist in
+ thinking it possible? It was my reverence for you that made me
+ persist! What was <i>I</i> that I should think otherwise? I had been shut
+ up here too long face to face with my own spirit, not to know myself,
+ and, so, to have lost the common illusions of vanity. All the men I
+ had ever known could not make your stature among them. So it was not
+ distrust, but reverence rather. I sate by while the angel stirred the
+ water, and I called it <i>Miracle</i>. Do not blame me now, ... <i>my</i> angel!
+</p>
+<p>
+ Nor say, that I 'do not lean' on you with all the weight of my 'past'
+ ... because I do! You cannot guess what you are to me&mdash;you cannot&mdash;it
+ is not possible:&mdash;and though I have said <i>that</i> before, I must say it
+ again ... for it comes again to be said. It is something to me between
+ dream and miracle, all of it&mdash;as if some dream of my earliest
+ brightest dreaming-time had been lying through these dark years to
+ steep in the sunshine, returning to me in a double light. <i>Can</i> it be,
+ I say to myself, that <i>you</i> feel for me <i>so</i>? can it be meant for me?
+ this from <i>you</i>?
+</p>
+<p>
+ If it is your 'right' that I should be gloomy at will with you, you
+ exercise it, I do think&mdash;for although I cannot promise to be very
+ sorrowful when you come, (how could that be?) yet from different
+ motives it seems to me that I have written to you quite superfluities
+ about my 'abomination of desolation,'&mdash;yes indeed, and blamed myself
+ afterwards. And now I must say this besides. When grief came upon
+ grief, I never was tempted to ask 'How have I deserved this of God,'
+ as sufferers sometimes do: I always felt that there must be cause
+ enough ... corruption enough, needing purification ... weakness
+ enough, needing strengthening ... <i>nothing</i> of the chastisement could
+ come to me without cause and need. But in this different hour, when
+ joy follows joy, and God makes me happy, as you say, <i>through</i> you ...
+ I cannot repress the ... 'How have I deserved <i>this</i> of Him?'&mdash;I know
+ I have not&mdash;I know I do not.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Could it be that heart and life were devastated to make room for
+ you?&mdash;If so, it was well done,&mdash;dearest! They leave the ground fallow
+ before the wheat.
+</p>
+<p>
+ 'Were you wrong in answering?' Surely not ... unless it is wrong to
+ show all this goodness ... and too much, it may be for <i>me</i>. When the
+ plants droop for drought and the copious showers fall suddenly, silver
+ upon silver, they die sometimes of the reverse of their adversities.
+ But no&mdash;<i>that</i>, even, shall not be a danger! And if I said 'Do not
+ answer,' I did not mean that I would not have a doubt removed&mdash;(having
+ <i>no</i> doubt!&mdash;) but I was simply unwilling to seem to be asking for
+ golden words ... going down the aisles with that large silken purse,
+ as <i>quêteuse</i>. Try to understand.
+</p>
+<p>
+ On Wednesday then!&mdash;George is invited to meet you on Thursday at Mr.
+ Kenyon's.
+</p>
+<p>
+ The <i>Examiner</i> speaks well, upon the whole, and with allowances ...
+ oh, that absurdity about metaphysics apart from poetry!&mdash;'Can such
+ things be' in one of the best reviews of the day? Mr. Kenyon was here
+ on Sunday and talking of the poems with real living tears in his eyes
+ and on his cheeks. But I will tell you. 'Luria' is to climb to the
+ place of a great work, I see. And if I write too long letters, is it
+ not because you spoil me, and because (being spoilt) I cannot help
+ it?&mdash;May God bless you always&mdash;
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">Your&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">E.B.B.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>R.B. to E.B.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Thursday Morning.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Here is the copy of Landor's verses.
+</p>
+<p>
+ You know thoroughly, do you not, why I brought all those good-natured
+ letters, desperate praise and all? Not, <i>not</i> out of the least vanity
+ in the world&mdash;nor to help myself in your sight with such testimony:
+ would it seem very extravagant, on the contrary, if I said that
+ perhaps I laid them before your eyes in a real fit of compunction at
+ not being, in my heart, thankful enough for the evident motive of the
+ writers,&mdash;and so was determined to give them the 'last honours' if
+ not the first, and not make them miss <i>you</i> because, through my fault,
+ they had missed <i>me</i>? Does this sound too fantastical? Because it is
+ strictly true: the most laudatory of all, I <i>skimmed</i> once over with
+ my flesh <i>creeping</i>&mdash;it seemed such a death-struggle, that of good
+ nature over&mdash;well, it is fresh ingratitude of me, so here it shall
+ end.
+</p>
+<p>
+ I am not ungrateful to <i>you</i>&mdash;but you must wait to know that:&mdash;I can
+ speak less than nothing with my living lips.
+</p>
+<p>
+ I mean to ask your brother how you are to-night ... so quietly!
+</p>
+<p>
+ God bless you, my dearest, and reward you.
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">Your R.B.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Mrs. Shelley&mdash;with the 'Ricordi.'
+</p>
+<p>
+ Of course, Landor's praise is altogether a different gift; a gold vase
+ from King Hiram; beside he has plenty of conscious rejoicing in his
+ own riches, and is not left painfully poor by what he sends away.
+ <i>That</i> is the unpleasant point with some others&mdash;they spread you a
+ board and want to gird up their loins and wait on you there. Landor
+ says 'come up higher and let us sit and eat together.' Is it not that?
+</p>
+<p>
+ Now&mdash;you are not to turn on me because the first is my proper feeling
+ to <i>you</i>, ... for poetry is not the thing given or taken between
+ us&mdash;it is heart and life and <i>my</i>self, not <i>mine</i>, I give&mdash;give? That
+ you glorify and change and, in returning then, give <i>me</i>!
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>E.B.B. to R.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Thursday.<br>
+[Post-mark, November 21, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ Thank you! and will you, if your sister made the copy of Landor's
+ verses for <i>me</i> as well as for you, thank <i>her</i> from me for another
+ kindness, ... not the second nor the third? For my own part, be sure
+ that if I did not fall on the right subtle interpretation about the
+ letters, at least I did not 'think it vain' of you! vain: when,
+ supposing you really to have been over-gratified by such letters, it
+ could have proved only an excess of humility!&mdash;But ... besides the
+ subtlety,&mdash;you meant to be kind to <i>me</i>, you know,&mdash;and I had a
+ pleasure and an interest in reading them&mdash;only that ... mind. Sir John
+ Hanmer's, I was half angry with! Now <i>is</i> he not cold?&mdash;and is it not
+ easy to see <i>why</i> he is forced to write his own scenes five times over
+ and over? He might have mentioned the 'Duchess' I think; and he a
+ poet! Mr. Chorley speaks some things very well&mdash;but what does he mean
+ about 'execution,' <i>en revanche</i>? but I liked his letter and his
+ candour in the last page of it. Will Mr. Warburton review you? does he
+ mean <i>that</i>? Now do let me see any other letters you receive. <i>May</i> I?
+ Of course Landor's 'dwells apart' from all: and besides the reason you
+ give for being gratified by it, it is well that one prophet should
+ open his mouth and prophesy and give his witness to the inspiration of
+ another. See what he says in the letter.... '<i>You may stand quite
+ alone if you will&mdash;and I think you will.' That</i> is a noble testimony
+ to a <i>truth</i>. And he discriminates&mdash;he understands and discerns&mdash;they
+ are not words thrown out into the air. The 'profusion of imagery
+ covering the depth of thought' is a true description. And, in the
+ verses, he lays his finger just on your characteristics&mdash;just on those
+ which, when you were only a poet to me, (only a poet: does it sound
+ irreverent? almost, I think!) which, when you were only a poet to me,
+ I used to study, characteristic by characteristic, and turn myself
+ round and round in despair of being ever able to approach, taking them
+ to be so essentially and intensely masculine that like effects were
+ unattainable, even in a lower degree, by any female hand. Did I not
+ tell you so once before? or oftener than once? And must not these
+ verses of Landor's be printed somewhere&mdash;in the <i>Examiner</i>? and again
+ in the <i>Athenæum</i>? if in the <i>Examiner</i>, certainly again in the
+ <i>Athenæum</i>&mdash;it would be a matter of course. Oh those verses: how they
+ have pleased me! It was an act worthy of him&mdash;and of <i>you</i>.
+</p>
+<p>
+ George has been properly 'indoctrinated,' and, we must hope, will do
+ credit to my instructions. Just now ... just as I was writing ... he
+ came in to say good-morning and good-night (he goes to chambers
+ earlier than I receive visitors generally), and to ask with a smile,
+ if I had 'a message for my friend' ... <i>that</i> was you ... and so he
+ was indoctrinated. He is good and true, honest and kind, but a little
+ over-grave and reasonable, as I and my sisters complain continually.
+ The great Law lime-kiln dries human souls all to one colour&mdash;and he is
+ an industrious reader among law books and knows a good deal about
+ them, I have heard from persons who can judge; but with a sacrifice of
+ impulsiveness and liberty of spirit, which <i>I</i> should regret for him
+ if he sate on the Woolsack even. Oh&mdash;that law! how I do detest it! I
+ hate it and think ill of it&mdash;I tell George so sometimes&mdash;and he is
+ good-natured and only thinks to himself (a little audibly now and
+ then) that I am a woman and talking nonsense. But the morals of it,
+ and the philosophy of it! And the manners of it! in which the whole
+ host of barristers looks down on the attorneys and the rest of the
+ world!&mdash;how long are these things to last!
+</p>
+<p>
+ Theodosia Garrow, I have seen face to face once or twice. She is very
+ clever&mdash;very accomplished&mdash;with talents and tastes of various kinds&mdash;a
+ musician and linguist, in most modern languages I believe&mdash;and a
+ writer of fluent graceful melodious verses, ... you cannot say any
+ more. At least <i>I</i> cannot&mdash;and though I have not seen this last poem
+ in the 'Book of Beauty,' I have no more trust ready for it than for
+ its predecessors, of which Mr. Landor said as much. It is the personal
+ feeling which speaks in him, I fancy&mdash;simply the personal
+ feeling&mdash;and, <i>that</i> being the case, it does not spoil the
+ discriminating appreciation on the other page of this letter. I might
+ have the modesty to admit besides that I may be wrong and he, right,
+ all through. But ... 'more intense than Sappho'!&mdash;more intense than
+ intensity itself!&mdash;to think of <i>that</i>!&mdash;Also the word 'poetry' has a
+ clear meaning to me, and all the fluency and facility and quick
+ ear-catching of a tune which one can find in the world, do not answer
+ to it&mdash;no.
+</p>
+<p>
+ How is the head? will you tell me? I have written all this without a
+ word of it, and yet ever since yesterday I have been uneasy, ... I
+ cannot help it. You see you are not better but worse. 'Since you were
+ in Italy'&mdash;Then is it England that disagrees with you? and is it
+ change away from England that you want? ... <i>require</i>, I mean. If
+ so&mdash;why what follows and ought to follow? You must not be ill
+ indeed&mdash;<i>that</i> is the first necessity. Tell me how you are, exactly
+ how you are; and remember to walk, and not to work too much&mdash;for my
+ sake&mdash;if you care for me&mdash;if it is not too bold of me to say so. I had
+ fancied you were looking better rather than otherwise: but those
+ sensations in the head are frightful and ought to be stopped by
+ whatever means; even by the worst, as they would seem to <i>me</i>.
+ Well&mdash;it was bad news to hear of the increase of pain; for the
+ amendment was a 'passing show' I fear, and not caused even by thoughts
+ of mine or it would have appeared before; while on the other side (the
+ sunny side of the way) I heard on that same yesterday, what made me
+ glad as good news, a whole gospel of good news, and from <i>you</i> too who
+ profess to say 'less than nothing,' and <i>that</i> was that '<i>the times
+ seemed longer to you</i>':&mdash;do you remember saying it? And it made me
+ glad ... happy&mdash;perhaps too glad and happy&mdash;and surprised: yes,
+ surprised!&mdash;for if you had told me (but you would not have told me) if
+ you had let me guess ... just the contrary, ... '<i>that the times
+ seemed shorter</i>,' ... why it would have seemed to <i>me</i> as natural as
+ nature&mdash;oh, believe me it would, and I could not have thought hardly
+ of you for it in the most secret or silent of my thoughts. How am I
+ to feel towards you, do you imagine, ... who have the world round you
+ and yet make me this to you? I never can tell you how, and you never
+ can know it without having my heart in you with all its experiences:
+ we measure by those weights. May God bless you! and save <i>me</i> from
+ being the cause to you of any harm or grief!... I choose it for <i>my</i>
+ blessing instead of another. What should I be if I could fail
+ willingly to you in the least thing? But I <i>never will</i>, and you know
+ it. I will not move, nor speak, nor breathe, so as willingly and
+ consciously to touch, with one shade of wrong, that precious deposit
+ of 'heart and life' ... which may yet be recalled.
+</p>
+<p>
+ And, so, may God bless you and your
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">E.B.B.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Remember to say how you are.
+</p>
+<p>
+ I sent 'Pomfret'&mdash;and Shelley is returned, and the letters, in the
+ same parcel&mdash;but my letter goes by the post as you see. Is there
+ contrast enough between the two rival female personages of 'Pomfret.'
+ <i>I</i> fancy not. Helena should have been more 'demonstrative' than she
+ appeared in Italy, to secure the 'new modulation' with Walter. But you
+ will not think it a strong book, I am sure, with all the good and pure
+ intention of it. The best character ... most life-like ... as
+ conventional life goes ... seems to <i>me</i> 'Mr. Rose' ... beyond all
+ comparison&mdash;and the best point, the noiseless, unaffected manner in
+ which the acting out of the 'private judgment' in Pomfret himself is
+ made no heroic virtue but simply an integral part of the love of
+ truth. As to Grace she is too good to be interesting, I am afraid&mdash;and
+ people say of her more than she expresses&mdash;and as to 'generosity,' she
+ could not do otherwise in the last scenes.
+</p>
+<p>
+ But I will not tell you the story after all.
+</p>
+<p>
+ At the beginning of this letter I meant to write just one page; but my
+ generosity is like Grace's, and could not help itself. There were the
+ letters to write of, and the verses! and then, you know, 'femme qui
+ parle' never has done. <i>Let</i> me hear! and I will be as brisk as a
+ monument next time for variety.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>R.B. to E.B.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Friday Night.<br>
+[Post-mark, November 22, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ How good and kind to send me these books! (The letter I say nothing
+ of, according to convention: if I wrote down 'best and kindest' ...
+ oh, what poorest words!) I shall tell you all about 'Pomfret,' be
+ sure. Chorley talked of it, as we walked homewards together last
+ night,&mdash;modestly and well, and spoke of having given away two copies
+ only ... to his mother one, and the other to&mdash;Miss Barrett, and 'she
+ seemed interested in the life of it, entered into his purpose in it,'
+ and I listened to it all, loving Chorley for his loveability which is
+ considerable at other times, and saying to myself what might run
+ better in the child's couplet&mdash;'Not more than others I deserve, Though
+ God has given me more'!&mdash;Given me the letter which expresses surprise
+ that I shall feel these blanks between the days when I see you longer
+ and longer! So am <i>I</i> surprised&mdash;that I should have mentioned so
+ obvious a matter at all; or leave unmentioned a hundred others its
+ correlatives which I cannot conceive you to be ignorant of, you! When
+ I spread out my riches before me, and think <i>what</i> the hour and more
+ means that you endow one with, I <i>do</i>&mdash;not to say <i>could</i>&mdash;I <i>do</i> form
+ resolutions, and say to myself&mdash;'If next time I am bidden stay away a
+ <SPAN class="sc-ex">fortnight</span>, I will not reply by a word beyond the grateful assent.' I
+ <i>do</i>, God knows, lay up in my heart these priceless treasures,&mdash;shall
+ I tell you? I never in my life kept a journal, a register of sights,
+ or fancies, or feelings; in my last travel I put down on a slip of
+ paper a few dates, that I might remember in England, on such a day I
+ was on Vesuvius, in Pompeii, at Shelley's grave; all that should be
+ kept in memory is, with <i>me</i>, best left to the brain's own process.
+ But I have, from the first, recorded the date and the duration of
+ every visit to you; the numbers of minutes you have given me ... and I
+ put them together till they make ... nearly two days now;
+ four-and-twenty-hour-long-days, that I have been <i>by you</i>&mdash;and I enter
+ the room determining to get up and go sooner ... and I go away into
+ the light street repenting that I went so soon by I don't know how
+ many minutes&mdash;for, love, what is it all, this love for you, but an
+ earnest desiring to include you in myself, if that might be; to feel
+ you in my very heart and hold you there for ever, through all chance
+ and earthly changes!
+</p>
+<p>
+ There, I had better leave off; the words!
+</p>
+<p>
+ I was very glad to find myself with your brother yesterday; I like him
+ very much and mean to get a friend in him&mdash;(to supply the loss of my
+ friend ... Miss Barrett&mdash;which is gone, the friendship, so gone!) But
+ I did not ask after you because I heard Moxon do it. Now of Landor's
+ verses: I got a note from Forster yesterday telling me that he, too,
+ had received a copy ... so that there is no injunction to be secret.
+ So I got a copy for dear Mr. Kenyon, and, lo! what comes! I send the
+ note to make you smile! I shall reply that I felt in duty bound to
+ apprise you; as I did. You will observe that I go to that too facile
+ gate of his on Tuesday, <i>my day</i> ... from your house directly. The
+ worst is that I have got entangled with invitations already, and must
+ go out again, <i>hating</i> it, to more than one place.
+</p>
+<p>
+ I am <i>very</i> well&mdash;quite well; yes, dearest! The pain is quite gone;
+ and the inconvenience, hard on its trace. You will write to me again,
+ will you not? And be as brief as your heart lets you, to me who hoard
+ up your words and get remote and imperfect ideas of what ... shall it
+ be written?... anger at you could mean, when I see a line blotted out;
+ a <i>second-thoughted</i> finger-tip rapidly put forth upon one of my gold
+ pieces!
+</p>
+<p>
+ I rather think if Warburton reviews me it will be in the <i>Quarterly</i>,
+ which I know he writes for. Hanmer is a very sculpturesque passionless
+ high-minded and amiable man ... this coldness, as you see it, is part
+ of him. I like his poems, I think, better than you&mdash;'the Sonnets,' do
+ you know them? Not 'Fra Cipolla.' See what is here, since you will not
+ let me have only you to look at&mdash;this is Landor's first
+ opinion&mdash;expressed to Forster&mdash;see the date! and last of all, see me
+ and know me, beloved! May God bless you!
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>E.B.B. to R.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Saturday.<br>
+[Post-mark, November 22, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ Mr. Kenyon came yesterday&mdash;and do you know when he took out those
+ verses and spoke his preface and I understood what was to follow, I
+ had a temptation from my familiar Devil not to say I had read them
+ before&mdash;I had the temptation strong and clear. For he (Mr. K.) told me
+ that your sister let him see them&mdash;.
+</p>
+<p>
+ But no&mdash;My 'vade retro' prevailed, and I spoke the truth and shamed
+ the devil and surprised Mr. Kenyon besides, as I could observe. Not an
+ observation did he make till he was just going away half an hour
+ afterwards, and then he said rather dryly ... 'And now may I ask how
+ long ago it was when you first read these verses?&mdash;was it a fortnight
+ ago?' It was better, I think, that I should not have made a mystery of
+ such a simple thing, ... and yet I felt half vexed with myself and
+ with him besides. But the verses,&mdash;how he praised them! more than I
+ thought of doing ... as verses&mdash;though there is beauty and music and
+ all that ought to be. Do you see clearly now that the latter lines
+ refer to the combination in you,&mdash;the qualities over and above those
+ held in common with Chaucer? And I have heard this morning from two or
+ three of the early readers of the <i>Chronicle</i> (I never care to see it
+ till the evening) that the verses are there&mdash;so that my wishes have
+ fulfilled themselves <i>there</i> at least&mdash;strangely, for wishes of mine
+ ... which generally 'go by contraries' as the soothsayers declare of
+ dreams. How kind of you to send me the fragment to Mr. Forster! and
+ how I like to read it. Was the Hebrew yours <i>then</i> ... <i>written then</i>,
+ I mean ... or written <i>now</i>?
+</p>
+<p>
+ Mr. Kenyon told me that you were to dine with him on Tuesday, and I
+ took for granted, at first hearing, that you would come on Wednesday
+ perhaps to me&mdash;and afterwards I saw the possibility of the two ends
+ being joined without much difficulty. Still, I was not sure, before
+ your letter came, how it might be.
+</p>
+<p>
+ That you really are better is the best news of all&mdash;thank you for
+ telling me. It will be wise not to go out <i>too</i> much&mdash;'aequam servare
+ mentem' as Landor quotes, ... in this as in the rest. Perhaps that
+ worst pain was a sort of crisis ... the sharp turn of the road about
+ to end ... oh, I do trust it may be so.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Mr. K. wrote to Landor to the effect that it was not because he (Mr.
+ K.) held you in affection, nor because the verses expressed critically
+ the opinion entertained of you by all who could judge, nor because
+ they praised a book with which his own name was associated ... but for
+ the abstract beauty of those verses ... for <i>that</i> reason he could not
+ help naming them to Mr. Landor. All of which was repeated to me
+ yesterday.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Also I heard of you from George, who admired you&mdash;admired you ... as
+ if you were a chancellor in <i>posse</i>, a great lawyer in <i>esse</i>&mdash;and
+ then he thought you ... what he never could think a lawyer ...
+ '<i>unassuming</i>.' And <i>you</i> ... you are so kind! Only <i>that</i> makes me
+ think bitterly what I have thought before, but cannot write to-day.
+</p>
+<p>
+ It was good-natured of Mr. Chorley to send me a copy of his book, and
+ he sending so few&mdash;very! George who admires <i>you</i>, does not tolerate
+ Mr. Chorley ... (did I tell ever?) declares that the affectation is
+ 'bad,' and that there is a dash of vulgarity ... which I positively
+ refuse to believe, and <i>should</i>, I fancy, though face to face with the
+ most vainglorious of waistcoats. How can there be vulgarity even of
+ manners, with so much mental refinement? I never could believe in
+ those combinations of contradictions.
+</p>
+<p>
+ 'An obvious matter,' you think! as obvious, as your 'green hill' ...
+ which I cannot see. For the rest ... my thought upon your 'great
+ <i>fact</i>' of the 'two days,' is quite different from yours ... for I
+ think directly, 'So little'! so dreadfully little! What shallow earth
+ for a deep root! What can be known of me in that time? 'So <i>there</i>, is
+ the only good, you see, that comes from making calculations on a slip
+ of paper! It is not and it cannot come to good.' I would rather look
+ at my seventy-five letters&mdash;there is room to breathe in them. And this
+ is my idea (<i>ecce</i>!) of monumental brevity&mdash;and <i>hic jacet</i> at last
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">Your E.B.B.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>R.B. to E.B.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Sunday Night.<br>
+[Post-mark, November 24, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ But a word to-night, my love&mdash;for my head aches a little,&mdash;I had to
+ write a long letter to my friend at New Zealand, and now I want to sit
+ and think of you and get well&mdash;but I must not quite lose the word I
+ counted on.
+</p>
+<p>
+ So, <i>that</i> way you will take my two days and turn them against me?
+ <i>Oh, you!</i> Did I say the 'root' had been striking then, or rather,
+ that the seeds, whence the roots take leisure and grow, <i>they</i> had
+ been planted then&mdash;and might not a good heart and hand drop acorns
+ enough to grow up into a complete Dodona-grove,&mdash;when the very rook,
+ say farmers, hides and forgets whole navies of ship-wood one day to
+ be, in his summer storing-journeys? But this shall do&mdash;I am not going
+ to prove what <i>may</i> be, when here it <i>is</i>, to my everlasting
+ happiness.
+</p>
+<p>
+ &mdash;And 'I am kind'&mdash;there again! Do I not know what you mean by that?
+ Well it is some comfort that you make all even in some degree, and
+ take from my faculties here what you give them, spite of my
+ protesting, in other directions. So I could not when I first saw you
+ admire you very much, and wish for your friendship, and be willing to
+ give you mine, and desirous of any opportunity of serving you,
+ benefiting you; I could not think the finding myself in a position to
+ feel this, just this and no more, a sufficiently fortunate event ...
+ but I must needs get up, or imitate, or ... what is it you fancy I do?
+ ... an utterly distinct, unnecessary, inconsequential regard for you,
+ which should, when it got too hard for shamming at the week's
+ end,&mdash;should simply spoil, in its explosion and departure, all the
+ real and sufficing elements of an honest life-long attachment and
+ affections! that I should do this, and think it a piece of kindness
+ does....
+</p>
+<p>
+ Now, I'll tell you what it <i>does</i> deserve, and what it shall get. Give
+ me, dearest beyond expression, what I have always dared to think I
+ would ask you for ... one day! Give me ... wait&mdash;for your own sake,
+ not mine who never, never dream of being worth such a gift ... but for
+ your own sense of justice, and to <i>say</i>, so as my heart shall hear,
+ that you were wrong and are no longer so, give me so much of you&mdash;all
+ precious that you are&mdash;as may be given in a lock of your hair&mdash;I will
+ live and die with it, and with the memory of you&mdash;this <i>at</i> the
+ <i>worst</i>! If you give me what I beg,&mdash;shall I say next Tuesday ... when
+ I leave you, I will not speak a word. If you do not, I will not think
+ you unjust, for all my light words, but I will pray you to wait and
+ remember me one day&mdash;when the power to deserve more may be greater ...
+ never the will. God supplies all things: may he bless you, beloved! So
+ I can but pray, kissing your hand.
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">R.B.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Now pardon me, dearest, for what is written ... what I cannot cancel,
+ for the love's sake that it grew from.
+</p>
+<p>
+ The <i>Chronicle</i> was through Moxon, I believe&mdash;Landor had sent the
+ verses to Forster at the same time as to me, yet they do not appear. I
+ never in my life less cared about people's praise or blame for myself,
+ and never more for its influence on <i>other people</i> than now&mdash;I would
+ stand as high as I could in the eyes of all about you&mdash;yet not, after
+ all, at poor Chorley's expense whom your brother, I am sure,
+ unintentionally, is rather hasty in condemning; I have told you of my
+ own much rasher opinion and how I was ashamed and sorry when I
+ corrected it after. C. is of a different species to your brother,
+ differently trained, looking different ways&mdash;and for some of the
+ peculiarities that strike at first sight, C. himself gives a good
+ reason to the enquirer on better acquaintance. For 'Vulgarity'&mdash;NO!
+ But your kind brother will alter his view, I know, on further
+ acquaintance ... and,&mdash;woe's me&mdash;will find that 'assumption's' pertest
+ self would be troubled to exercise its quality at such a house as Mr.
+ K.'s, where every symptom of a proper claim is met half way and helped
+ onward far too readily.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Good night, now. Am I not yours&mdash;are you not mine? And can that make
+ <i>you</i> happy too?
+</p>
+<p>
+ Bless you once more and for ever.
+</p>
+<p>
+ That scrap of Landor's being for no other eye than mine&mdash;I made the
+ foolish comment, that there was no blotting out&mdash;made it some four or
+ five years ago, when I could read what I only guess at now, through my
+ idle opening the hand and letting the caught bird go&mdash;but there used
+ to be a real satisfaction to me in writing those grand Hebrew
+ characters&mdash;the noble languages!
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>E.B.B. to R.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Monday.<br>
+[Post-mark, November 24, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ But what unlawful things have I said about 'kindness'? I did not mean
+ any harm&mdash;no, indeed! And as to thinking ... as to having ever
+ thought, that you could 'imitate' (can this word be 'imitate'?) an
+ unfelt feeling or a feeling unsupposed to be felt ... I may solemnly
+ assure you that I never, never did so. 'Get up'&mdash;'imitate'!! But it
+ was the contrary ... <i>all</i> the contrary! From the beginning, now <i>did</i>
+ I not believe you too much? Did I not believe you even in your
+ contradiction of yourself ... in your <i>yes</i> and <i>no</i> on the same
+ subject, ... and take the world to be turning round backwards and
+ myself to have been shut up here till I grew mad, ... rather than
+ disbelieve you either way? Well!&mdash;You know it as well as I can tell
+ you, and I will not, any more. If I have been 'wrong,' it was not <i>so</i>
+ ... nor indeed <i>then</i> ... it is not <i>so</i>, though it is <i>now</i>, perhaps.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Therefore ... but wait! I never gave away what you ask me to give
+ <i>you</i>, to a human being, except my nearest relatives and once or twice
+ or thrice to female friends, ... never, though reproached for it; and
+ it is just three weeks since I said last to an asker that I was 'too
+ great a prude for such a thing'! it was best to anticipate the
+ accusation!&mdash;And, prude or not, I could not&mdash;I never
+ could&mdash;<i>something</i> would not let me. And now ... what am I to do ...
+ 'for my own sake and not yours?' Should you have it, or not? Why I
+ suppose ... <i>yes</i>. I suppose that 'for my own sense of justice and in
+ order to show that I was wrong' (which is wrong&mdash;you wrote a wrong
+ word there ... 'right,' you meant!) 'to show that I was <i>right</i> and am
+ no longer so,' ... I suppose you must have it, 'Oh, <i>You</i>,' ... who
+ have your way in everything! Which does not mean ... Oh, vous, qui
+ avez toujours raison&mdash;far from it.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Also ... which does not mean that I shall give you what you ask for,
+ <i>to-morrow</i>,&mdash;because I shall not&mdash;and one of my conditions is (with
+ others to follow) that <i>not a word be said to-morrow</i>, you understand.
+ Some day I will send it perhaps ... as you <i>knew</i> I should ... ah, as
+ you knew I should ... notwithstanding that 'getting up' ... that
+ 'imitation' ... of humility: as you knew <i>too</i> well I should!
+</p>
+<p>
+ Only I will not teaze you as I might perhaps; and now that your
+ headache has begun again&mdash;the headache again: the worse than headache!
+ See what good my wishes do! And try to understand that if I speak of
+ my being 'wrong' now in relation to you ... of my being right before,
+ and wrong now, ... I mean wrong for your sake, and not for mine ...
+ wrong in letting you come out into the desert here to me, you whose
+ place is by the waters of Damascus. But I need not tell you over
+ again&mdash;you <i>know</i>. May God bless you till to-morrow and past it for
+ ever. Mr. Kenyon brought me your note yesterday to read about the
+ 'order in the button-hole'&mdash;ah!&mdash;or 'oh, <i>you</i>,' may I not re-echo? It
+ enrages me to think of Mr. Forster; publishing too as he does, at a
+ moment, the very sweepings of Landor's desk! Is the motive of the
+ reticence to be looked for somewhere among the cinders?&mdash;Too bad it
+ is. So, till to-morrow! and you shall not be 'kind' any more.
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">Your</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">E.B.B.
+</p>
+<p>
+ But how, 'a <i>foolish</i> comment'? Good and true rather! And I admired
+ the <i>writing</i><a href="#note-21"><b>21</b></a> ... worthy of the reeds of Jordan!
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>R.B. to E.B.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Thursday Morning.<br>
+[Post-mark, November 27, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ How are you? and Miss Bayley's visit yesterday, and Mr. K.'s
+ to-day&mdash;(He told me he should see you this morning&mdash;and <i>I</i> shall pass
+ close by, having to be in town and near you,&mdash;but only the thought
+ will reach you and be with you&mdash;) tell me all this, dearest.
+</p>
+<p>
+ How kind Mr. Kenyon was last night and the day before! He neither
+ wonders nor is much vexed, I dare believe&mdash;and I write now these few
+ words to say so&mdash;My heart is set on next Thursday, remember ... and
+ the prize of Saturday! Oh, dearest, believe for truth's sake, that I
+ <SPAN class="sc-ex">would</span> most frankly own to any fault, any imperfection in the beginning
+ of my love of you; in the pride and security of this present stage it
+ has reached&mdash;I <i>would</i> gladly learn, by the full lights now, what an
+ insufficient glimmer it grew from, ... but there <i>never has been
+ change</i>, only development and increased knowledge and strengthened
+ feeling&mdash;I was made and meant to look for you and wait for you and
+ become yours for ever. God bless you, and make me thankful!
+</p>
+<p>
+ And you <i>will</i> give me <i>that</i>? What shall save me from wreck: but
+ truly? How must I feel to you!
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">Yours R.B.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>E.B.B. to R.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Monday Evening.<br>
+[Post-mark, November 27, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ Now you must not blame me&mdash;you must not. To make a promise is one
+ thing, and to keep it, quite another: and the conclusion you see 'as
+ from a tower.' Suppose I had an oath in heaven somewhere ... near to
+ 'coma Berenices,' ... never to give you what you ask for! ... would
+ not such an oath be stronger than a mere half promise such as I sent
+ you a few hours ago? Admit that it would&mdash;and that I am not to blame
+ for saying now ... (listen!) that I <i>never can</i> nor <i>will give you
+ this thing</i>;&mdash;only that I will, if you please, exchange it for another
+ thing&mdash;you understand. <i>I</i> too will avoid being 'assuming'; I will not
+ pretend to be generous, no, nor 'kind.' It shall be pure merchandise
+ or nothing at all. Therefore determine!&mdash;remembering always how our
+ 'ars poetica,' after Horace, recommends 'dare et petere
+ vicissim'&mdash;which is making a clatter of pedantry to take advantage of
+ the noise ... because perhaps I ought to be ashamed to say this to
+ you, and perhaps I <i>am</i>! ... yet say it none the less.
+</p>
+<p>
+ And ... less lightly ... if you have right and reason on your side,
+ may I not have a little on mine too? And shall I not care, do you
+ think?... Think!
+</p>
+<p>
+ Then there is another reason for me, entirely mine. You have come to
+ me as a dream comes, as the best dreams come ... dearest&mdash;and so there
+ is need to me of 'a sign' to know the difference between dream and
+ vision&mdash;and <i>that</i> is my completest reason, my own reason&mdash;you have
+ none like it; none. A ticket to know the horn-gate from the ivory, ...
+ ought I not to have it? Therefore send it to me before I send you
+ anything, and if possible by that Lewisham post which was the most
+ frequent bringer of your letters until these last few came, and which
+ reaches me at eight in the evening when all the world is at dinner and
+ my solitude most certain. Everything is so still then, that I have
+ heard the footsteps of a letter of yours ten doors off ... or more,
+ perhaps. Now beware of imagining from this which I say, that there is
+ a strict police for my correspondence ... (it is not so&mdash;) nor that I
+ do not like hearing from you at any and every hour: it <i>is</i> so. Only I
+ would make the smoothest and sweetest of roads for ... and you
+ <i>understand</i>, and do not <i>imagine</i> beyond.
+</p>
+<p>
+ <i>Tuesday evening.</i>&mdash;What is written is written, ... all the above: and
+ it is forbidden to me to write a word of what I could write down here
+ ... forbidden for good reasons. So I am silent on <i>conditions</i> ...
+ those being ... first ... that you never do such things again ... no,
+ you must not and shall not.... I <i>will not let it be</i>: and secondly,
+ that you try to hear the unspoken words, and understand how your gift
+ will remain with me while <i>I</i> remain ... they need not be said&mdash;just
+ as <i>it</i> need not have been so beautiful, for that. The beauty drops
+ 'full fathom five' into the deep thought which covers it. So I study
+ my Machiavelli to contrive the possibility of wearing it, without
+ being put to the question violently by all the curiosity of all my
+ brothers;&mdash;the questions 'how' ... 'what' ... 'why' ... put round and
+ edgeways. They are famous, some of them, for asking questions. I say
+ to them&mdash;'well: how many more questions?' And now ... for <i>me</i>&mdash;<i>have</i>
+ I said a word?&mdash;<i>have</i> I not been obedient? And by rights and in
+ justice, there should have been a reproach ... if there could!
+ Because, friendship or more than friendship, Pisa or no Pisa, it was
+ unnecessary altogether from you to me ... but I have done, and you
+ shall not be teazed.
+</p>
+<p>
+ <i>Wednesday.</i>&mdash;Only ... I persist in the view of the <i>other</i> question.
+ This will not do for the '<i>sign</i>,' ... this, which, so far from being
+ qualified for disproving a dream, is the beautiful image of a dream in
+ itself ... <i>so</i> beautiful: and with the very shut eyelids, and the
+ "little folding of the hands to sleep." You see at a glance it will
+ not do. And so&mdash;
+</p>
+<p>
+ Just as one might be interrupted while telling a fairy-tale, ... in
+ the midst of the "and so's" ... just <i>so</i>, I have been interrupted by
+ the coming in of Miss Bayley, and here she has been sitting for nearly
+ two hours, from twelve to two nearly, and I like her, do you know. Not
+ only she talks well, which was only a thing to expect, but she seems
+ to <i>feel</i> ... to have great sensibility&mdash;<i>and</i> her kindness to me ...
+ kindness of manner and words and expression, all together ... quite
+ touched me.&mdash;I did not think of her being so loveable a person. Yet it
+ was kind and generous, her proposition about Italy; (did I tell you
+ how she made it to me through Mr. Kenyon long ago&mdash;when I was a mere
+ stranger to her?) the proposition to go there with me herself. It was
+ quite a grave, earnest proposal of hers&mdash;which was one of the reasons
+ why I could not even <i>wish</i> not to see her to-day. Because you see, it
+ was a tremendous degree of experimental generosity, to think of going
+ to Italy by sea with an invalid stranger, "seule <i>à</i> seule." And she
+ was wholly in earnest, wholly. Is there not good in the world after
+ all?
+</p>
+<p>
+ Tell me how you are, for I am not at ease about you&mdash;You were not well
+ even yesterday, I thought. If this goes on ... but it mustn't go
+ on&mdash;oh, it must not. May God bless us more!
+</p>
+<p>
+ Do not fancy, in the meantime, that you stay here 'too long' for any
+ observation that can be made. In the first place there is nobody to
+ 'observe'&mdash;everybody is out till seven, except the one or two who will
+ not observe if I tell them not. My sisters are glad when you come,
+ because it is a gladness of mine, ... they observe. I have a great
+ deal of liberty, to have so many chains; we all have, in this house:
+ and though the liberty has melancholy motives, it saves some daily
+ torment, and <i>I</i> do not complain of it for one.
+</p>
+<p>
+ May God bless you! Do not forget me. Say how you are. What good can I
+ do you with all my thoughts, when you keep unwell? See!&mdash;Facts are
+ against fancies. As when I would not have the lamp lighted yesterday
+ because it seemed to make it later, and you proved directly that it
+ would not make it <i>earlier</i>, by getting up and going away!
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">Wholly and ever your</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">E.B.B.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>R.B. to E.B.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">[Post-mark, November 28, 1845.]<b><a href="#note-22">22</a></b>
+</p>
+<p>
+ Take it, dearest; what I am forced to think you mean&mdash;and take <i>no
+ more</i> with it&mdash;for I gave all to give long ago&mdash;I am all yours&mdash;and
+ now, <i>mine</i>; give me <i>mine</i> to be happy with!
+</p>
+<p>
+ You will have received my note of yesterday.&mdash;I am glad you are
+ satisfied with Miss Bayley, whom I, too, thank ... that is, sympathize
+ with, ... (not wonder at, though)&mdash;for her intention.... Well, may it
+ all be for best&mdash;here or at Pisa, you are my blessing and life.
+</p>
+<p>
+ ... How all considerate you are, <i>you</i> that are the kind, kind one!
+ The post arrangement I will remember&mdash;to-day, for instance, will this
+ reach you at 8? I shall be with you then, in thought. 'Forget
+ you!'&mdash;<i>What</i> does that mean, dearest?
+</p>
+<p>
+ And I might have stayed longer and you let me go. What does <i>that</i>
+ mean, also tell me? Why, I make up my mind to go, always, like a man,
+ and praise myself as I get through it&mdash;as when one plunges into the
+ cold water&mdash;<SPAN class="sc-ex">only</span> ... ah, <i>that</i> too is no more a merit than any other
+ thing I do ... there is the reward, the last and best! Or is it the
+ 'lure'?
+</p>
+<p>
+ I would not be ashamed of my soul if it might be shown you,&mdash;it is
+ wholly grateful, conscious of you.
+</p>
+<p>
+ But another time, do not let me wrong myself <i>so</i>! Say, 'one minute
+ more.'
+</p>
+<p>
+ On Monday?&mdash;I am <i>much</i> better&mdash;and, having got free from an
+ engagement for Saturday, shall stay quietly here and think the post
+ never intending to come&mdash;for you will not let me wait longer?
+</p>
+<p>
+ Shall I dare write down a grievance of my heart, and not offend you?
+ Yes, trusting in the right of my love&mdash;you tell me, sweet, here in the
+ letter, 'I do not look so well'&mdash;and sometimes, I 'look better' ...
+ <i>how do you know</i>? When I first saw you&mdash;<i>I saw your eyes</i>&mdash;since
+ then, <i>you</i>, it should appear, see mine&mdash;but I only <i>know</i> yours are
+ there, and have to use that memory as if one carried dried flowers
+ about when fairly inside the garden-enclosure. And while I resolve,
+ and hesitate, and resolve again to complain of this&mdash;(kissing your
+ foot ... not boldly complaining, nor rudely)&mdash;while I have this on my
+ mind, on my heart, ever since that May morning ... can it be?
+</p>
+<p>
+ &mdash;No, nothing <i>can be</i> wrong now&mdash;you will never call me 'kind' again,
+ in that sense, you promise! Nor think 'bitterly' of my kindness, that
+ word!
+</p>
+<p>
+ Shall I <i>see</i> you on Monday?
+</p>
+<p>
+ God bless you my dearest&mdash;I see her now&mdash;and <i>here</i> and <i>now</i> the eyes
+ open, wide <i>enough</i>, and I will kiss them&mdash;<i>how</i> gratefully!
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">Your own</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">R.B.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>E.B.B. to R.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Friday.<br>
+[Post-mark, December 1, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ It comes at eight o'clock&mdash;the post says eight ... <i>I</i> say nearer half
+ past eight ... it <i>comes</i>&mdash;and I thank you, thank you, as I can. Do
+ you remember the purple lock of a king on which hung the fate of a
+ city? <i>I</i> do! And I need not in conscience&mdash;because this one here did
+ not come to me by treason&mdash;'ego et rex meus,' on the contrary, do
+ fairly give and take.
+</p>
+<p>
+ I meant at first only to send you what is in the ring ... which, by
+ the way, will not fit you I know&mdash;(not certainly in the finger which
+ it was meant for ...) as it would not Napoleon before you&mdash;but can
+ easily be altered to the right size.... I meant at first to send you
+ only what was in the ring: but your fashion is best so you shall have
+ it both ways. Now don't say a word on Monday ... nor at all. As for
+ the ring, recollect that I am forced to feel blindfold into the outer
+ world, and take what is nearest ... by chance, not choice ... or it
+ might have been better&mdash;a little better&mdash;perhaps. The <i>best</i> of it is
+ that it's the colour of your blue flowers. Now you will not say a
+ word&mdash;I trust to you.
+</p>
+<p>
+ It is enough that you should have said these others, I think. Now <i>is</i>
+ it just of you? isn't it hard upon me? And if the charge is true,
+ whose fault is it, pray? I have been ashamed and vexed with myself
+ fifty times for being so like a little girl, ... for seeming to have
+ 'affectations'; and all in vain: 'it was stronger than I,' as the
+ French say. And for <i>you</i> to complain! As if Haroun Alraschid after
+ cutting off a head, should complain of the want of an
+ obeisance!&mdash;Well!&mdash;I smile notwithstanding. Nobody can help
+ smiling&mdash;both for my foolishness which is great, I confess, though
+ somewhat exaggerated in your statement&mdash;(because if it was quite as
+ bad as you say, you know, I never should have <i>seen you</i> ... and <i>I
+ have</i>!) and also for yours ... because you take such a very
+ preposterously wrong way for overcoming anybody's shyness. Do you
+ know, I have laughed ... really laughed at your letter. No&mdash;it has not
+ been so bad. I have seen you at every visit, as well as I could with
+ both eyes wide open&mdash;only that by a supernatural influence they won't
+ stay open with <i>you</i> as they are used to do with other people ... so
+ now I tell you. And for the rest I promise nothing at all&mdash;as how can
+ I, when it is quite beyond my control&mdash;and you have not improved my
+ capabilities ... do you think you have? Why what nonsense we have come
+ to&mdash;we, who ought to be 'talking Greek!' said Mr. Kenyon.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Yes&mdash;he came and talked of you, and told me how you had been speaking
+ of ... me; and I have been thinking how I should have been proud of it
+ a year ago, and how I could half scold you for it now. Ah yes&mdash;and Mr.
+ Kenyon told me that you had spoken exaggerations&mdash;such
+ exaggerations!&mdash;Now should there not be some scolding ... some?
+</p>
+<p>
+ But how did you expect Mr. Kenyon to 'wonder' at <i>you</i>, or be 'vexed'
+ with <i>you</i>? That would have been strange surely. You are and always
+ have been a chief favourite in that quarter ... appreciated, praised,
+ loved, I think.
+</p>
+<p>
+ While I write, a letter from America is put into my hands, and having
+ read it through with shame and confusion of face ... not able to help
+ a smile though notwithstanding, ... I send it to you to show how you
+ have made me behave!&mdash;to say nothing of my other offences to the kind
+ people at Boston&mdash;and to a stray gentleman in Philadelphia who is to
+ perform a pilgrimage next year, he says, ... to visit the Holy Land
+ and your E.B.B. I was naughty enough to take <i>that</i> letter to be a
+ circular ... for the address of various 'Europ<i>a</i>ians.' In any case
+ ... just see how I have behaved! and if it has not been worse than ...
+ not opening one's eyes!&mdash;Judge. Really and gravely I am ashamed&mdash;I
+ mean as to Mr. Mathews, who has been an earnest, kind friend to
+ me&mdash;and I do mean to behave better. I say <i>that</i> to prevent your
+ scolding, you know. And think of Mr. Poe, with that great Roman
+ justice of his (if not rather American!), dedicating a book to one and
+ abusing one in the preface of the same. He wrote a review of me in
+ just that spirit&mdash;the two extremes of laudation and reprehension,
+ folded in on one another. You would have thought that it had been
+ written by a friend and foe, each stark mad with love and hate, and
+ writing the alternate paragraphs&mdash;a most curious production indeed.
+</p>
+<p>
+ And here I shall end. I have been waiting ... waiting for what does
+ not come ... the ring ... sent to have the hair put in; but it won't
+ come (now) until too late for the post, and you must hear from me
+ before Monday ... you ought to have heard to-day. It has not been my
+ fault&mdash;I have waited. Oh these people&mdash;who won't remember that it is
+ possible to be out of patience! So I send you my letter now ... and
+ what is in the paper now ... and the rest, you shall have after
+ Monday. And you <i>will not say a word</i> ... not then ... not at all!&mdash;I
+ trust you. And may God bless you.
+</p>
+<p>
+ If ever you care less for me&mdash;I do not say it in distrust of you ... I
+ trust you wholly&mdash;but you are a man, and free to care less, ... and if
+ ever you <i>do</i> ... why in that case you will destroy, burn, ... do all
+ but send back ... enough is said for you to understand.
+</p>
+<p>
+ May God bless you. You are <i>best</i> to me&mdash;best ... as I see ... in the
+ world&mdash;and so, dearest aright to
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">Your</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">E.B.B.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Finished on Saturday evening. Oh&mdash;this thread of silk&mdash;And to post!!
+ After all you must wait till Tuesday. I have no silk within reach and
+ shall miss the post. Do forgive me.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>E.B.B. to R.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Saturday Evening.
+</p>
+<p>
+ This is the mere postscript to the letter I have just sent away. By a
+ few minutes too late, comes what I have all day been waiting for, ...
+ and besides (now it is just too late!) now I may have a skein of silk
+ if I please, to make that knot with, ... for want of which, two locks
+ meant for you, have been devoted to the infernal gods already ...
+ fallen into a tangle and thrown into the fire ... and all the hair of
+ my head might have followed, for I was losing my patience and temper
+ fast, ... and the post to boot. So wisely I shut my letter, (after
+ unwisely having driven everything to the last moment!)&mdash;and now I have
+ silk to tie fast with ... to tie a 'nodus' ... 'dignus' of the
+ celestial interposition&mdash;and a new packet shall be ready to go to you
+ directly.
+</p>
+<p>
+ At last I remember to tell you that the first letter you had from me
+ this week, was forgotten, (not by <i>me</i>) forgotten, and detained, so,
+ from the post&mdash;a piece of carelessness which Wilson came to confess to
+ me too frankly for me to grumble as I should have done otherwise.
+</p>
+<p>
+ For the staying longer, I did not mean to say you were wrong not to
+ stay. In the first place you were keeping your father 'in a maze,' as
+ you said yourself&mdash;and then, even without that, I never know what
+ o'clock it is ... never. Mr. Kenyon tells me that I must live in a
+ dream&mdash;which I do&mdash;time goes ... seeming to go round rather than go
+ forward. The watch I have, broke its spring two years ago, and there I
+ leave it in the drawer&mdash;and the clocks all round strike out of
+ hearing, or at best, when the wind brings the sound, one upon another
+ in a confusion. So you know more of time than I do or can.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Till Monday then! I send the 'Ricordi' to take care of the rest ... of
+ mine. It is a touching story&mdash;and there is an impracticable nobleness
+ from end to end in the spirit of it. How <i>slow</i> (to the ear and mind)
+ that Italian rhetoric is! a language for dreamers and declaimers. Yet
+ Dante made it for action, and Machiavelli's prose can walk and strike
+ as well as float and faint.
+</p>
+<p>
+ The ring is smaller than I feared at first, and may perhaps&mdash;
+</p>
+<p>
+ Now you will not say a word. My excuse is that you had nothing to
+ remember me by, while I had this and this and this and this ... how
+ much too much!
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">If I could be too much</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">Your&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">E.B.B.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>R.B. to E.B.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Tuesday.<br>
+[Post-mark, December 2, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ I was happy, so happy before! But I am happier and richer now. My
+ love&mdash;no words could serve here, but there is life before us, and to
+ the end of it the vibration now struck will extend&mdash;I will live and
+ die with your beautiful ring, your beloved hair&mdash;comforting me,
+ blessing me.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Let me write to-morrow&mdash;when I think on all you have been and are to
+ me, on the wonder of it and the deliciousness, it makes the paper
+ words that come seem vainer than ever&mdash;To-morrow I will write.
+</p>
+<p>
+ May God bless you, my own, my precious&mdash;
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">I am all your own</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">R.B.
+</p>
+<p>
+ I have thought again, and believe it will be best to select the finger
+ <i>you</i> intended ... as the alteration will be simpler, I find; and one
+ is less liable to observation and comment.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Was not that Mr. Kenyon last evening? And did he ask, or hear, or say
+ anything?
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>R.B. to E.B.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">[Post-mark, December 3, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ See, dearest, what the post brings me this minute! Now, is it not a
+ good omen, a pleasant inconscious prophecy of what is to be? Be it
+ well done, or badly&mdash;there are you, leading me up and onward, in his
+ review as everywhere, at every future time! And our names will go
+ together&mdash;be read together. In itself this is nothing to <i>you</i>, dear
+ poet&mdash;but the unexpectedness, unintended significance of it has
+ pleased me very much&mdash;<i>does</i> it not please you?&mdash;I thought I was to
+ figure in that cold <i>Quarterly</i> all by myself, (for he writes for
+ it)&mdash;but here you are close by me; it cannot but be for good. He has
+ no knowledge whatever that I am even a friend of yours. Say you are
+ pleased!
+</p>
+<p>
+ There was no writing yesterday for me&mdash;nor will there be much to-day.
+ In some moods, you know, I turn and take a thousand new views of what
+ you say ... and find fault with you to your surprise&mdash;at others, I
+ rest on you, and feel <i>all</i> well, all <i>best</i> ... now, for one
+ instance, even that phrase of the <i>possibility</i> 'and what is to
+ follow,'&mdash;even <i>that</i> I cannot except against&mdash;I am happy, contented;
+ too well, too prodigally blessed to be even able to murmur just
+ sufficiently loud to get, in addition to it all, a sweetest stopping
+ of the mouth! I will say quietly and becomingly 'Yes&mdash;I do promise
+ you'&mdash;yet it is some solace to&mdash;No&mdash;I will <i>not</i> even couple the
+ promise with an adjuration that you, at the same time, see that they
+ care for me properly at Hanwell Asylum ... the best by all accounts:
+ yet I feel so sure of <i>you</i>, so safe and confident in you! If any of
+ it had been <i>my</i> work, my own ... distrust and foreboding had pursued
+ me from the beginning; but all is <i>yours</i>&mdash;you crust me round with
+ gold and jewelry like the wood of a sceptre; and why should you
+ transfer your own work? Wood enough to choose from in the first
+ instance, but the choice once made!... So I rest on you, for life, for
+ death, beloved&mdash;beside you do stand, in my solemn belief, the direct
+ miraculous gift of God to me&mdash;that is my solemn belief; may I be
+ thankful!
+</p>
+<p>
+ I am anxious to hear from you ... when am I not?&mdash;but <i>not</i> before the
+ American letter is written and sent. Is that done? And who was the
+ visitor on Monday&mdash;and if &amp;c. <i>what</i> did he remark?&mdash;And what is
+ right or wrong with Saturday&mdash;is it to be mine?
+</p>
+<p>
+ Bless you, dearest&mdash;now and for ever&mdash;words cannot say how much I am
+ your own.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>E.B.B. to R.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Tuesday Evening.<br>
+[Post-mark, December 4, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ No Mr. Kenyon after all&mdash;not yesterday, not to-day; and the knock at
+ the door belonged perhaps to the post, which brought me a kind letter
+ from Mrs. Jameson to ask how I was, and if she might come&mdash;but she
+ won't come on Saturday.... I shall 'provide'&mdash;she may as well (and
+ better) come on a free day. On the other side, are you sure that Mr.
+ Procter may not stretch out his hand and seize on Saturday (he was to
+ dine with you, you said), or that some new engagement may not start up
+ suddenly in the midst of it? I trust to you, in such a case, to alter
+ <i>our</i> arrangement, without a second thought. Monday stands close by,
+ remember, and there's a Saturday to follow Monday ... and I should
+ understand at a word, or apart from a word.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Just as <i>you</i> understand how to 'take me with guile,' when you tell me
+ that anything in me can have any part in making you happy ... you, who
+ can say such words and call them 'vain words.' Ah, well! If I only
+ knew certainly, ... more certainly than the thing may be known by
+ either me or you, ... that nothing in me could have any part in making
+ you <i>un</i>happy, ... ah, would it not be enough ... <i>that</i> knowledge ...
+ to content me, to overjoy me? but <i>that</i> lies too high and out of
+ reach, you see, and one can't hope to get at it except by the ladder
+ Jacob saw, and which an archangel helped to hide away behind the gate
+ of Heaven afterwards.
+</p>
+<p>
+ <i>Wednesday.</i>&mdash;In the meantime I had a letter from you yesterday, and
+ am promised another to-day. How ... I was going to say 'kind' and
+ pull down the thunders ... how <i>un</i>kind ... will <i>that</i> do? ... how
+ good you are to me&mdash;how dear you must be! Dear&mdash;dearest&mdash;if I feel
+ that you love me, can I help it if, without any other sort of certain
+ knowledge, the world grows lighter round me? being but a mortal woman,
+ can I help it? no&mdash;certainly.
+</p>
+<p>
+ I comfort myself by thinking sometimes that I can at least understand
+ you, ... comprehend you in what you are and in what you possess and
+ combine; and that, if doing this better than others who are better
+ otherwise than I, I am, so far, worthier of the ... I mean that to
+ understand you is something, and that I account it something in my own
+ favour ... mine.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Yet when you tell me that I ought to know some things, though untold,
+ you are wrong, and speak what is impossible. My imagination sits by
+ the roadside <span title="apedilos">&alpha;&pi;&epsilon;&delta;&iota;&lambda;&omicron;&sigmaf;</span> like the startled sea nymph in
+ Æschylus, but never dares to put one unsandalled foot, unbidden, on a
+ certain tract of ground&mdash;never takes a step there unled! and never (I
+ write the simple truth) even as the alternative of the probability of
+ your ceasing to care for me, have I touched (untold) on the
+ possibility of your caring <i>more</i> for me ... never! That you should
+ <i>continue</i> to care, was the utmost of what I saw in that direction.
+ So, when you spoke of a 'strengthened feeling,' judge how I listened
+ with my heart&mdash;judge!
+</p>
+<p>
+ 'Luria' is very great. You will avenge him with the sympathies of the
+ world; that, I foresee.... And for the rest, it is a magnanimity which
+ grows and grows, and which will, of a worldly necessity, fall by its
+ own weight at last; nothing less being possible. The scene with
+ Tiburzio and the end of the act with its great effects, are more
+ pathetic than professed pathos. When I come to criticise, it will be
+ chiefly on what I take to be a little occasional flatness in the
+ versification, which you may remove if you please, by knotting up a
+ few lines here and there. But I shall write more of 'Luria,'&mdash;and
+ well remember in the meanwhile, that you wanted smoothness, you said.
+</p>
+<p>
+ May God bless you. I shall have the letter to-night, I think gladly.
+ Yes,&mdash;I thought of the greater safety from 'comment'&mdash;it is best in
+ every way.
+</p>
+<p>
+ I lean on you and trust to you, and am always, as to one who is all to
+ me,
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">Your own&mdash;
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>E.B.B. to R.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">[Post-mark, December 4, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ Why of course I am pleased&mdash;I should have been pleased last year, for
+ the vanity's sake of being reviewed in your company. Now, as far as
+ that vice of vanity goes ... shall I tell you?... I would infinitely
+ prefer to see you set before the public in your own right solitude,
+ and supremacy, apart from me or any one else, ... this, as far as my
+ vice of vanity goes, ... and because, vainer I am of my poet than of
+ my poems ... <i>pour cause</i>. But since, according to the <i>Quarterly</i>
+ régime, you were to be not apart but with somebody of my degree, I am
+ glad, pleased, that it should be with myself:&mdash;and since I was to be
+ there at all, I am pleased, very much pleased that it should be with
+ <i>you</i>,&mdash;oh, of course I am pleased!&mdash;I am pleased that the 'names
+ should be read together' as you say, ... and am happily safe from the
+ apprehension of that ingenious idea of yours about 'my leading <i>you</i>'
+ &amp;c. ... quite happily safe from the apprehension of that idea's
+ occurring to any mind in the world, except just your own. Now if I
+ 'find fault' with you for writing down such an extravagance, such an
+ ungainly absurdity, (oh, I shall abuse it just as I shall choose!)
+ <i>can</i> it be 'to your surprise?' <i>can</i> it? Ought you to say such
+ things, when in the first place they are unfit in themselves and
+ inapplicable, and in the second place, abominable in my eyes? The
+ qualification for Hanwell Asylum is different peradventure from what
+ you take it to be&mdash;we had better not examine it too nearly. You never
+ will say such words again? It is your promise to me? Not those
+ words&mdash;and not any in their likeness.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Also ... nothing is <i>my</i> work ... if you please! What an omen you take
+ in calling anything my work! If it is my work, woe on it&mdash;for
+ everything turns to evil which I touch. Let it be God's work and
+ yours, and I may take breath and wait in hope&mdash;and indeed I exclaim to
+ myself about the miracle of it far more even than you can do. It seems
+ to me (as I say over and over ... I say it to my own thoughts
+ oftenest) it seems to me still a dream how you came here at all, ...
+ the very machinery of it seems miraculous. Why did I receive you and
+ only you? Can I tell? no, not a word.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Last year I had such an escape of seeing Mr. Horne; and in this way it
+ was. He was going to Germany, he said, for an indefinite time, and
+ took the trouble of begging me to receive him for ten minutes before
+ he went. I answered with my usual 'no,' like a wild Indian&mdash;whereupon
+ he wrote me a letter so expressive of mortification and vexation ...
+ 'mortification' was one of the words used, I remember, ... that I grew
+ ashamed of myself and told him to come any day (of the last five or
+ six days he had to spare) between two and five. Well!&mdash;he never came.
+ Either he was overcome with work and engagements of various sorts and
+ had not a moment, (which was his way of explaining the matter and
+ quite true I dare say) or he was vexed and resolved on punishing me
+ for my caprices. If the latter was the motive, I cannot call the
+ punishment effective, ... for I clapped my hands for joy when I felt
+ my danger to be passed&mdash;and now of course, I have no scruples.... I
+ may be as capricious as I please, ... may I not? Not that I ask you.
+ It is a settled matter. And it is useful to keep out Mr. Chorley with
+ Mr. Horne, and Mr. Horne with Mr. Chorley, and the rest of the world
+ with those two. Only the miracle is that <i>you</i> should be behind the
+ enclosure&mdash;within it ... and so!&mdash;
+</p>
+<p>
+ <i>That</i> is <i>my</i> side of the wonder! of the machinery of the wonder, ...
+ as <i>I</i> see it!&mdash;But there are greater things than these.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Speaking of the portrait of you in the 'Spirit of the Age' ... which
+ is not like ... no!&mdash;which has not your character, in a line of it ...
+ something in just the forehead and eyes and hair, ... but even <i>that</i>,
+ thrown utterly out of your order, by another bearing so unlike you...!
+ speaking of that portrait ... shall I tell you?&mdash;Mr. Horne had the
+ goodness to send me all those portraits, and I selected the heads
+ which, in right hero-worship, were anything to me, and had them framed
+ after a rough fashion and hung up before my eyes; Harriet Martineau's
+ ... because she was a woman and admirable, and had written me some
+ kind letters&mdash;and for the rest, Wordsworth's, Carlyle's, Tennyson's
+ and yours. The day you paid your first visit here, I, in a fit of
+ shyness not quite unnatural, ... though I have been cordially laughed
+ at for it by everybody in the house ... pulled down your portrait, ...
+ (there is the nail, under Wordsworth&mdash;) and then pulled down
+ Tennyson's in a fit of justice,&mdash;because I would not have his hung up
+ and yours away. It was the delight of my brothers to open all the
+ drawers and the boxes, and whatever they could get access to, and find
+ and take those two heads and hang them on the old nails and analyse my
+ 'absurdity' to me, day after day; but at last I tired them out, being
+ obstinate; and finally settled the question one morning by fastening
+ the print of you inside your Paracelsus. Oh no, it is not like&mdash;and I
+ knew it was not, before I saw you, though Mr. Kenyon said, 'Rather
+ like!'
+</p>
+<p>
+ By the way Mr. Kenyon does not come. It is strange that he should not
+ come: when he told me that he could not see me 'for a week or a
+ fortnight,' he meant it, I suppose.
+</p>
+<p>
+ So it is to be on Saturday? And I will write directly to America&mdash;the
+ letter will be sent by the time you get this. May God bless you ever.
+</p>
+<p>
+ It is not so much a look of 'ferocity,' ... as you say, ... in that
+ head, as of <i>expression by intention</i>. Several people have said of it
+ what nobody would say of you ... 'How affected-looking.' Which is too
+ strong&mdash;but it is not like you, in any way, and there's the truth.
+</p>
+<p>
+ So until Saturday. I read 'Luria' and feel the life in him. But <i>walk</i>
+ and do not <i>work</i>! do you?
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">Wholly your</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">E.B.B.
+</p>
+<h3><i>R.B. to E.B.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Sunday Night.<br>
+[Post-mark, December 8, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ Well, I did see your brother last night ... and very wisely neither
+ spoke nor kept silence in the proper degree, but said that 'I hoped
+ you were well'&mdash;from the sudden feeling that I must say <i>something</i> of
+ you&mdash;not pretend indifference about you <i>now</i> ... and from the
+ impossibility of saying the <i>full</i> of what I might; because other
+ people were by&mdash;and after, in the evening, when I should have remedied
+ the first imperfect expression, I had not altogether the heart. So,
+ you, dearest, will clear me with him if he wonders, will you not? But
+ it all hangs together; speaking of you,&mdash;to you,&mdash;writing to you&mdash;all
+ is helpless and sorrowful work by the side of what is in my soul to
+ say and to write&mdash;or is it not the natural consequence? If these
+ vehicles of feelings sufficed&mdash;<i>there</i> would be the end!&mdash;And that my
+ feeling for you should end!... For the rest, the headache which kept
+ away while I sate with you, made itself amends afterward, and as it is
+ unkind to that warm Talfourd to look blank at his hospitable
+ endeavours, all my power of face went <i>à qui de droit</i>&mdash;
+</p>
+<p>
+ Did your brother tell you ... yes, I think ... of the portentous book,
+ lettered II, and thick as a law-book, of congratulatory letters on
+ the appearance of 'Ion'?&mdash;But how under the B's in the Index came
+ 'Miss Barrett' and, woe's me, 'R.B.'! I don't know when I have had so
+ ghastly a visitation. There was the utterly <i>forgotten</i> letter, in the
+ as thoroughly disused hand-writing, in the ... I fear ... still as
+ completely obsolete feeling&mdash;no, not so bad as that&mdash;but at first
+ there was all the novelty, and social admiration at the friend&mdash;it is
+ truly not right to pluck all the rich soil from the roots and hold
+ them up clean and dry as if they came <i>so</i> from all you now see, which
+ is nothing at all ... like the Chinese Air-plant! Do you understand
+ this? And surely 'Ion' is a <i>very</i>, very beautiful and noble
+ conception, and finely executed,&mdash;a beautiful work&mdash;what has come
+ after, has lowered it down by grade after grade ... it don't stand
+ apart on the hill, like a wonder, now it is <i>built up</i> to by other
+ attempts; but the great difference is in myself. Another maker of
+ another 'Ion,' finding me out and behaving as Talfourd did, would not
+ find <i>that me</i>, so to be behaved to, so to be honoured&mdash;though he
+ should have all the good will! Ten years ago!
+</p>
+<p>
+ And ten years hence!
+</p>
+<p>
+ Always understand that you do <i>not</i> take me as I was at the beginning
+ ... with a crowd of loves to give to <i>something</i> and so get rid of
+ their pain and burden. I have <i>known</i> what that ends in&mdash;a handful of
+ anything may be as sufficient a sample, serve your purposes and teach
+ you its nature, as well as whole heaps&mdash;and I know what most of the
+ pleasures of this world are&mdash;so that I <i>can</i> be surer of myself, and
+ make you surer, on calm demonstrated grounds, than if I had a host of
+ objects of admiration or ambition <i>yet</i> to become acquainted with. You
+ say, 'I am a man and may change'&mdash;I answer, yes&mdash;but, while I hold my
+ senses, only change for the <i>presumable</i> better ... not for the
+ <i>experienced worst</i>.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Here is my Uncle's foot on the stair ... his knock hurried the last
+ sentence&mdash;here he is by me!&mdash;Understand what this would have led to,
+ how you would have been <i>proved logically</i> my own, best, extreme want,
+ my life's end&mdash;<SPAN class="sc-ex">yes</span>; dearest! Bless you ever&mdash;
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">R.B.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>E.B.B. to R.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Sunday.<br>
+[Post-mark, December 8, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ Let me hear how you are, and that you are better instead of worse for
+ the exertions of last night. After you left me yesterday I considered
+ how we might have managed it more conveniently for you, and had the
+ lamp in, and arranged matters so as to interpose less time between the
+ going and the dining, even if you and George did not go together,
+ which might have been best, but which I did not like quite to propose.
+ Now, supposing that on Thursday you dine in town, remember not to be
+ unnecessarily 'perplext in the extreme' where to spend the time before
+ ... <i>five</i>, ... shall I say, at any rate? We will have the lamp, and I
+ can easily explain if an observation should be made ... only it will
+ not be, because our goers-out here never come home until six, and the
+ head of the house, not until seven ... as I told you. George thought
+ it worth while going to Mr. Talfourd's yesterday, just to see the
+ author of 'Paracelsus' dance the Polka ... should I not tell you?
+</p>
+<p>
+ I am vexed by another thing which he tells <i>me</i>&mdash;vexed, if amused a
+ little by the absurdity of it. I mean that absurd affair of the
+ 'Autography'&mdash;now <i>isn't</i> it absurd? And for neither you nor George to
+ have the chivalry of tearing out that letter of mine, which was absurd
+ too in its way, and which, knowing less of the world than I know now,
+ I wrote as if writing for my private conscience, and privately
+ repented writing in a day, and have gone on repenting ever since when
+ I happened to think enough of it for repentance! Because if Mr.
+ Serjeant Talfourd sent then his 'Ion' to <i>me</i>, he did it in mere
+ good-nature, hearing by chance of me through the publisher of my
+ 'Prometheus' at the moment, and of course caring no more for my
+ 'opinion' than for the rest of me&mdash;and it was excessively bad taste in
+ me to say more than the briefest word of thanks in return, even if I
+ had been competent to say it. Ah well!&mdash;you see how it is, and that I
+ am vexed <i>you</i> should have read it, ... as George says you did ... he
+ laughing to see me so vexed. So I turn round and avenge myself by
+ crying aloud against the editor of the 'Autography'! Surely such a
+ thing was never done before ... even by an author in the last stage of
+ a mortal disease of self-love. To edit the common parlance of
+ conventional flatteries, ... lettered in so many volumes, bound in
+ green morocco, and laid on the drawing-room table for one's own
+ particular private public,&mdash;is it not a miracle of vanity ... neither
+ more nor less?
+</p>
+<p>
+ I took the opportunity of the letter to Mr. Mathews (talking of vanity
+ ... <i>mine</i>!) to send Landor's verses to America ... yours&mdash;so they
+ will be in the American papers.... I know Mr. Mathews. I was speaking
+ to him of your last number of 'Bells and Pomegranates,' and the verses
+ came in naturally; just as my speaking did, for it is not the first
+ time nor the second nor the third even that I have written to him of
+ you, though I admire how in all those previous times I did it in pure
+ disinterestedness, ... purely because your name belonged to my country
+ and to her literature, ... and how I have a sort of reward at this
+ present, in being able to write what I please without anyone's saying
+ 'it is a new fancy.' As for the Americans, they have 'a zeal without
+ knowledge' for poetry. There is more love for <i>verse</i> among them than
+ among the English. But they suffer themselves to be led in their
+ choice of poets by English critics of average discernment; this is
+ said of them by their own men of letters. Tennyson is idolized deep
+ down in the bush woods (to their honour be it said), but to
+ understand <i>you</i> sufficiently, they wait for the explanations of the
+ critics. So I wanted them to see what Landor says of you. The comfort
+ in these questions is, that there can be <i>no</i> question, except between
+ the sooner and the later&mdash;a little sooner, and a little later: but
+ when there is real love and zeal it becomes worth while to try to
+ ripen the knowledge. They love Tennyson so much that the colour of his
+ waistcoats is a sort of minor Oregon question ... and I like that&mdash;do
+ not <i>you</i>?
+</p>
+<p>
+ <i>Monday.</i>&mdash;Now I have your letter: and you will observe, without a
+ finger post from me, how busily we have both been preoccupied in
+ disavowing our own letters of old on 'Ion'&mdash;Mr. Talfourd's collection
+ goes to prove too much, I think&mdash;and you, a little too much, when you
+ draw inferences of no-changes, from changes like these. Oh yes&mdash;I
+ perfectly understand that every sort of inconstancy of purpose regards
+ a 'presumably better' thing&mdash;but I do not so well understand how any
+ presumable doubt is to be set to rest by that fact, ... I do not
+ indeed. Have you seen all the birds and beasts in the world? have you
+ seen the 'unicorns'?&mdash;Which is only a pebble thrown down into your
+ smooth logic; and we need not stand by to watch the bubbles born of
+ it. And as to the 'Ion' letters, I am delighted that you have anything
+ to repent, as I have everything. Certainly it is a noble play&mdash;there
+ is the moral sublime in it: but it is not the work of a poet, ... and
+ if he had never written another to show what was <i>not</i> in him, this
+ might have been 'predicated' of it as surely, I hold. Still, it is a
+ noble work&mdash;and even if you over-praised it, (I did not read your
+ letter, though you read mine, alas!) you, under the circumstances,
+ would have been less noble yourself not to have done so&mdash;only, how I
+ agree with you in what you say against the hanging up of these dry
+ roots, the soil shaken off! Such abominable taste&mdash;now isn't it? ...
+ though you do not use that word.
+</p>
+<p>
+ I thought Mr. Kenyon would have come yesterday and that I might have
+ something to tell you, of him at least.
+</p>
+<p>
+ And George never told me of the thing you found to say to him of me,
+ and which makes me smile, and would have made him wonder if he had not
+ been suffering probably from some legal distraction at the moment,
+ inasmuch as <i>he knew perfectly that you had just left me</i>. My sisters
+ told him down-stairs and he came into this room just before he set off
+ on Saturday, with a, ... '<i>So</i> I am to meet Mr. Browning?' But he made
+ no observation afterwards&mdash;none: and if he heard what you said at all
+ (which I doubt), he referred it probably to some enforced civility on
+ 'Yorick's' part when the 'last chapter' was too much with him.
+</p>
+<p>
+ I have written about 'Luria' in another place&mdash;you shall have the
+ papers when I have read through the play. How different this living
+ poetry is from the polished rhetoric of 'Ion.' The man and the statue
+ are not more different. After all poetry is a distinct thing&mdash;it is
+ here or it is not here ... it is not a matter of '<i>taste</i>,' but of
+ sight and feeling.
+</p>
+<p>
+ As to the 'Venice' it gives proof (does it not?) rather of poetical
+ sensibility than of poetical faculty? or did you expect me to say
+ more?&mdash;of the perception of the poet, rather than of his conception.
+ Do you think more than this? There are fine, eloquent expressions, and
+ the tone of sentiment is good and high everywhere.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Do not write 'Luria' if your head is uneasy&mdash;and you cannot say that
+ it is not ... can you? Or will you if you can? In any case you will do
+ what you can ... take care of yourself and not suffer yourself to be
+ tired either by writing or by too much going out, and take the
+ necessary exercise ... this, you will do&mdash;I entreat you to do it.
+</p>
+<p>
+ May God bless and make you happy, as ... you will lose nothing if I
+ say ... as I am yours&mdash;
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>R.B. to E.B.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Tuesday Morning.<br>
+[Post-mark, December 9, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ Well, then, I am no longer sorry that I did <i>not</i> read <i>either</i> of
+ your letters ... for there were two in the collection. I did not read
+ one word of them&mdash;and hear why. When your brother and I took the book
+ between us in wonderment at the notion&mdash;we turned to the index, in
+ large text-hand, and stopped at 'Miss B.'&mdash;and <i>he</i> indeed read them,
+ or some of them, but holding the volume at a distance which defied my
+ short-sighted eye&mdash;all <i>I</i> saw was the <i>faint</i> small characters&mdash;and,
+ do you know ... I neither trusted myself to ask a nearer look ... nor
+ a second look ... as if I were studying unduly what I had just said
+ was most unfairly exposed to view!&mdash;so I was silent, and lost you (in
+ that)&mdash;then, and for ever, I promise you, now that you speak of
+ vexation it would give you. <i>All</i> I know of the notes, that <i>one</i> is
+ addressed to Talfourd in the third person&mdash;and when I had run through
+ my own ... not far off ... (BA-BR)&mdash;I was sick of the book altogether.
+ You are generous to me&mdash;but, to say the truth, I might have remembered
+ the most justifying circumstance in my case ... which was, that my own
+ 'Paracelsus,' printed a few months before, had been as dead a failure
+ as 'Ion' a brilliant success&mdash;for, until just before.... Ah, really I
+ forget!&mdash;but I know that until Forster's notice in the <i>Examiner</i>
+ appeared, <i>every</i> journal that thought worth while to allude to the
+ poem at all, treated it with entire contempt ... beginning, I think,
+ with the <i>Athenæum</i> which <i>then</i> made haste to say, a few days after
+ its publication, 'that it was not without talent but spoiled by
+ obscurity and only an imitation of&mdash;Shelley'!&mdash;something to this
+ effect, in a criticism of about three lines among their 'Library
+ Table' notices. And that first taste was a most flattering sample of
+ what the 'craft' had in store for me&mdash;since my publisher and I had
+ fairly to laugh at <i>his</i> 'Book'&mdash;(quite of another kind than the
+ Serjeant's)&mdash;in which he was used to paste extracts from newspapers
+ and the like&mdash;seeing that, out of a long string of notices, one vied
+ with its predecessor in disgust at my 'rubbish,' as their word went:
+ but Forster's notice altered a good deal&mdash;which I have to recollect
+ for his good. Still, the contrast between myself and Talfourd was so
+ <i>utter</i>&mdash;you remember the world's-wonder 'Ion' made,&mdash;that I was
+ determined not to pass for the curious piece of neglected merit I
+ really <i>was not</i>&mdash;and so!&mdash;
+</p>
+<p>
+ But, dearest, why should you leave your own especial sphere of doing
+ me good for another than yours?
+</p>
+<p>
+ Does the sun rake and hoe about the garden as well as thine steadily
+ over it? <i>Why</i> must you, who give me heart and power, as nothing else
+ did or could, to do well&mdash;concern yourself with what might be done by
+ any good, kind ministrant <i>only</i> fit for such offices? Not that I
+ <i>feel</i>, even, more bound to you for them&mdash;they have their weight, I
+ <i>know</i> ... but <i>what</i> weight beside the divine gift of yourself? Do
+ not, dear, dearest, care for making me known: <i>you</i> know me!&mdash;and
+ <i>they</i> know so little, after all your endeavour, who are ignorant of
+ what <i>you</i> are to me&mdash;if you ... well, but that <i>will</i> follow; if I do
+ greater things one day&mdash;what shall they serve for, what range
+ themselves under of right?&mdash;
+</p>
+<p>
+ Mr. Mathews sent me two copies of his poems&mdash;and, I believe, a
+ newspaper, 'when time was,' about the 'Blot in the Scutcheon'&mdash;and
+ also, through Moxon&mdash;(I <i>believe</i> it was Mr. M.)&mdash;a proposition for
+ reprinting&mdash;to which I assented of course&mdash;and there was an end to the
+ matter.
+</p>
+<p>
+ And might I have stayed <i>till five</i>?&mdash;dearest, I will never ask for
+ more than you give&mdash;but I feel every single sand of the gold showers
+ ... spite of what I say above! I <i>have</i> an invitation for Thursday
+ which I had no intention of remembering (it admitted of such
+ liberty)&mdash;but <i>now</i>....
+</p>
+<p>
+ Something I will <i>say</i>! 'Polka,' forsooth!&mdash;one lady whose <i>head</i>
+ could not, and another whose feet could not, dance!&mdash;But I talked a
+ little to your brother whom I like more and more: it comforts me that
+ he is yours.
+</p>
+<p>
+ So, <i>Thursday</i>,&mdash;thank you from the heart! I am well, and about to go
+ out. This week I have done nothing to 'Luria'&mdash;is it that my <i>ring</i> is
+ gone? There surely <i>is</i> something to forgive in me&mdash;for that shameful
+ business&mdash;or I should not feel as I do in the matter: but you <i>did</i>
+ forgive me.
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">God bless my own, only love&mdash;ever&mdash;</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">Yours wholly</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">R.B.
+</p>
+<p>
+ N.B. An antiquarian friend of mine in old days picked up a nondescript
+ wonder of a coin. I just remember he described it as Rhomboid in
+ shape&mdash;cut, I fancy, out of church-plate in troubled times. What did
+ my friend do but get ready a box, lined with velvet, and properly
+ <i>compartmented</i>, to have always about him, so that the <i>next such coin
+ he picked</i> up, say in Cheapside, he might at once transfer to a place
+ of safety ... his waistcoat pocket being no happy receptacle for the
+ same. I saw the box&mdash;and encouraged the man to keep a vigilant eye.
+</p>
+<p>
+ <i>Parallel.</i> R.B. having found an unicorn....
+</p>
+<p>
+ Do you forgive these strips of paper? I could not wait to send for
+ more&mdash;having exhausted my stock.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>E.B.B. to R.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Tuesday Evening<br>
+[Post-mark, December 10, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ It was right of you to write ... (now see what jangling comes of not
+ using the fit words.... I said 'right,' not to say 'kind') ... right
+ of you to write to me to-day&mdash;and I had begun to be disappointed
+ already because the post <i>seemed</i> to be past, when suddenly the knock
+ brought the letter which deserves all this praising. If not 'kind' ...
+ then <i>kindest</i> ... will that do better? Perhaps.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Mr. Kenyon was here to-day and asked when you were coming again&mdash;and
+ I, I answered at random ... 'at the end of the week&mdash;Thursday or
+ Friday'&mdash;which did not prevent another question about 'what we were
+ consulting about.' He said that he 'must have you,' and had written to
+ beg you to go to his door on days when you came here; only murmuring
+ something besides of neither Thursday nor Friday being disengaged days
+ with him. Oh, my disingenuousness!&mdash;Then he talked again of 'Saul.' A
+ true impression the poem has made on him! He reads it every night, he
+ says, when he comes home and just before he goes to sleep, to put his
+ dreams into order, and observed very aptly, I thought, that it
+ reminded him of Homer's shield of Achilles, thrown into lyrical whirl
+ and life. Quite ill he took it of me the 'not expecting him to like it
+ so much' and retorted on me with most undeserved severity (as I felt
+ it), that I 'never understood anybody to have any sensibility except
+ myself.' Wasn't it severe, to come from dear Mr. Kenyon? But he has
+ caught some sort of evil spirit from your 'Saul' perhaps; though
+ admiring the poem enough to have a good spirit instead. And do <i>you</i>
+ remember of the said poem, that it is there only as a first part, and
+ that the next parts must certainly follow and complete what will be a
+ great lyrical work&mdash;now remember. And forget 'Luria' ... if you are
+ better forgetting. And forget <i>me</i> ... <i>when</i> you are happier
+ forgetting. I say <i>that</i> too.
+</p>
+<p>
+ So your idea of an unicorn is&mdash;one horn broken off. And you a
+ poet!&mdash;one horn broken off&mdash;or hid in the blackthorn hedge!&mdash;
+</p>
+<p>
+ Such a mistake, as our enlightened public, on their part, made, when
+ they magnified the divinity of the brazen chariot, just under the
+ thunder-cloud! I don't remember the <i>Athenæum</i>, but can well believe
+ that it said what you say. The <i>Athenæum</i> admires only what gods, men
+ and columns reject. It applauds nothing but mediocrity&mdash;mark it, as a
+ general rule! The good, they see&mdash;the great escapes them. Dare to
+ breathe a breath above the close, flat conventions of literature, and
+ you are 'put down' and instructed how to be like other people. By the
+ way, see by the very last number, that you never think to write
+ 'peoples,' on pain of writing what is obsolete&mdash;and these the teachers
+ of the public! If the public does not learn, where is the marvel of
+ it? An imitation of Shelley!&mdash;when if 'Paracelsus' was anything it was
+ the expression of a new mind, as all might see&mdash;as <i>I</i> saw, let me be
+ proud to remember, and I was not overdazzled by 'Ion.'
+</p>
+<p>
+ Ah, indeed if I could 'rake and hoe' ... or even pick up weeds along
+ the walk, ... which is the work of the most helpless children, ... if
+ I could do any of this, there would be some good of me: but as for
+ 'shining' ... shining ... when there is not so much light in me as to
+ do 'carpet work' by, why let anyone in the world, <i>except you</i>, tell
+ me to shine, and it will just be a mockery! But you have studied
+ astronomy with your favourite snails, who are apt to take a
+ dark-lanthorn for the sun, and so.&mdash;
+</p>
+<p>
+ And so, you come on Thursday, and I only hope that Mrs. Jameson will
+ not come too, (the carpet work makes me think of her; and, not having
+ come yet, she may come on Thursday by a fatal cross-stitch!) for I do
+ not hear from her, and my precautions are 'watched out,' May God bless
+ you always.
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">Your own&mdash;
+</p>
+<p>
+ But no&mdash;I did not forgive. Where was the fault to be forgiven, except
+ in <i>me</i>, for not being right in my meaning?
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>R.B. to E.B.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Friday.<br>
+[Post-mark, December 12, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ And now, my heart's love, I am waiting to hear from you; my heart is
+ <i>full</i> of you. When I try to remember what I said yesterday, <i>that</i>
+ thought, of what fills my heart&mdash;only <i>that</i> makes me bear with the
+ memory.... I know that even such imperfect, poorest of words <i>must</i>
+ have come <i>from</i> thence if not bearing up to you all that is
+ there&mdash;and I know you are ever above me to receive, and help, and
+ forgive, and <i>wait</i> for the one day which I will never say to myself
+ cannot come, when I shall speak what I feel&mdash;more of it&mdash;or <i>some</i> of
+ it&mdash;for now nothing is spoken.
+</p>
+<p>
+ My all-beloved&mdash;
+</p>
+<p>
+ Ah, you opposed very rightly, I dare say, the writing that paper I
+ spoke of! The process should be so much simpler! I most earnestly
+ <i>expect</i> of you, my love, that in the event of any such necessity as
+ was then alluded to, you accept at once in my name <i>any</i> conditions
+ possible for a human will to submit to&mdash;there is no imaginable
+ condition to which you allow me to accede that I will not joyfully
+ bend all my faculties to comply with. And you know this&mdash;but so, also
+ do you know <i>more</i> ... and yet 'I may tire of you'&mdash;'may forget you'!
+</p>
+<p>
+ I will write again, having the long, long week to wait! And one of the
+ things I must say, will be, that with my love, I cannot lose my pride
+ in you&mdash;that nothing <i>but</i> that love could balance that pride&mdash;and
+ that, blessing the love so divinely, you must minister to the pride as
+ well; yes, my own&mdash;I shall follow your fame,&mdash;and, better than fame,
+ the good you do&mdash;in the world&mdash;and, if you please, it shall all be
+ mine&mdash;as your hand, as your eyes&mdash;
+</p>
+<p>
+ I will write and pray it from you into a promise ... and your promises
+ I live upon.
+</p>
+<p>
+ May God bless you! your R.B.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>E.B.B. to R.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Friday.<br>
+[Post-mark, December 13, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ Do not blame me in your thoughts for what I said yesterday or wrote a
+ day before, or think perhaps on the dark side of some other days when
+ I cannot help it ... always when I cannot help it&mdash;you could not
+ blame me if you saw the full motives as I feel them. If it is
+ distrust, it is not of <i>you</i>, dearest of all!&mdash;but of myself
+ rather:&mdash;it is not doubt <i>of</i> you, but <i>for</i> you. From the beginning I
+ have been subject to the too reasonable fear which rises as my spirits
+ fall, that your happiness might suffer in the end through your having
+ known me:&mdash;it is for <i>you</i> I fear, whenever I fear:&mdash;and if you were
+ less to me, ... <i>should</i> I fear do you think?&mdash;if you were to me only
+ what I am to myself for instance, ... if your happiness were only as
+ precious as my own in my own eyes, ... should I fear, do you think,
+ <i>then</i>? Think, and do not blame me.
+</p>
+<p>
+ To tell you to 'forget me when forgetting seemed happiest for you,'
+ ... (was it not <i>that</i>, I said?) proved more affection than might go
+ in smoother words.... I could prove the truth of <i>that</i> out of my
+ heart.
+</p>
+<p>
+ And for the rest, you need not fear any fear of mine&mdash;my fear will not
+ cross a wish of yours, be sure! Neither does it prevent your being all
+ to me ... all: more than I used to take for all when I looked round
+ the world, ... almost more than I took for all in my earliest dreams.
+ You stand in between me and not merely the living who stood closest,
+ but between me and the closer graves, ... and I reproach myself for
+ this sometimes, and, so, ask you not to blame me for a different
+ thing.
+</p>
+<p>
+ As to unfavourable influences, ... I can speak of them quietly, having
+ foreseen them from the first, ... and it is true, I have been thinking
+ since yesterday, that I might be prevented from receiving you here,
+ and <i>should</i>, if all were known: but with that act, the adverse power
+ would end. It is not my fault if I have to choose between two
+ affections; only my pain; and I have not to choose between two duties,
+ I feel, ... since I am yours, while I am of any worth to you at all.
+ For the plan of the sealed letter, it would correct no evil,&mdash;ah, you
+ do not see, you do not understand. The danger does not come from the
+ side to which a reason may go. Only one person holds the thunder&mdash;and
+ I shall be thundered at; I shall not be reasoned with&mdash;it is
+ impossible. I could tell you some dreary chronicles made for laughing
+ and crying over; and you know that if I once thought I might be loved
+ enough to be spared above others, I cannot think so now. In the
+ meanwhile we need not for the present be afraid. Let there be ever so
+ many suspectors, there will be no informers. I suspect the suspectors,
+ but the informers are out of the world, I am very sure:&mdash;and then, the
+ one person, by a curious anomaly, <i>never</i> draws an inference of this
+ order, until the bare blade of it is thrust palpably into his hand,
+ point outwards. So it has been in other cases than ours&mdash;and so it is,
+ at this moment in the house, with others than ourselves.
+</p>
+<p>
+ I have your letter to stop me. If I had my whole life in my hands with
+ your letter, could I thank you for it, I wonder, at all worthily? I
+ cannot believe that I could. Yet in life and in death I shall be
+ grateful to you.&mdash;
+</p>
+<p>
+ But for the paper&mdash;no. Now, observe, that it would seem like a
+ prepared apology for something wrong. And besides&mdash;the apology would
+ be nothing but the offence in another form&mdash;unless you said it was all
+ a mistake&mdash;(<i>will</i> you, again?)&mdash;that it was all a mistake and you
+ were only calling for your boots! Well, if you said <i>that</i>, it would
+ be worth writing, but anything less would be something worse than
+ nothing: and would not save me&mdash;which you were thinking of, I
+ know&mdash;would not save me the least of the stripes. For
+ 'conditions'&mdash;now I will tell you what I said once in a jest....
+</p>
+<p>
+ 'If a prince of Eldorado should come, with a pedigree of lineal
+ descent from some signory in the moon in one hand, and a ticket of
+ good-behaviour from the nearest Independent chapel, in the other'&mdash;?
+</p>
+<p>
+ 'Why even <i>then</i>,' said my sister Arabel, 'it would not <i>do</i>.' And she
+ was right, and we all agreed that she was right. It is an obliquity of
+ the will&mdash;and one laughs at it till the turn comes for crying. Poor
+ Henrietta has suffered silently, with that softest of possible
+ natures, which hers is indeed; beginning with implicit obedience, and
+ ending with something as unlike it as possible: but, you see, where
+ money is wanted, and where the dependence is total&mdash;see! And when
+ once, in the case of the one dearest to me; when just at the last he
+ was involved in the same grief, and I attempted to make over my
+ advantages to him; (it could be no sacrifice, you know&mdash;<i>I</i> did not
+ want the money, and could buy nothing with it so good as his
+ happiness,&mdash;) why then, my hands were seized and tied&mdash;and then and
+ there, in the midst of the trouble, came the end of all! I tell you
+ all this, just to make you understand a little. Did I not tell you
+ before? But there is no danger at present&mdash;and why ruffle this present
+ with disquieting thoughts? Why not leave that future to itself? For
+ me, I sit in the track of the avalanche quite calmly ... so calmly as
+ to surprise myself at intervals&mdash;and yet I know the reason of the
+ calmness well.
+</p>
+<p>
+ For Mr. Kenyon&mdash;dear Mr. Kenyon&mdash;he will speak the softest of words,
+ if any&mdash;only he will think privately that you are foolish and that I
+ am ungenerous, but I will not say so any more now, so as to teaze you.
+</p>
+<p>
+ There is another thing, of more consequence than <i>his</i> thoughts, which
+ is often in my mind to ask you of&mdash;but there will be time for such
+ questions&mdash;let us leave the winter to its own peace. If I should be
+ ill again you will be reasonable and we both must submit to God's
+ necessity. Not, you know, that I have the least intention of being
+ ill, if I can help it&mdash;and in the case of a tolerably mild winter, and
+ with all this strength to use, there are probabilities for me&mdash;and
+ then I have sunshine from <i>you</i>, which is better than Pisa's.
+</p>
+<p>
+ And what more would you say? Do I not hear and understand! It seems to
+ me that I do both, or why all this wonder and gratitude? If the
+ devotion of the remainder of my life could prove that I hear, ...
+ would it be proof enough? Proof enough perhaps&mdash;but not gift enough.
+</p>
+<p>
+ May God bless you always.
+</p>
+<p>
+ I have put <i>some</i> of the hair into a little locket which was given to
+ me when I was a child by my favourite uncle, Papa's only brother, who
+ used to tell me that he loved me better than my own father did, and
+ was jealous when I was not glad. It is through him in part, that I am
+ richer than my sisters&mdash;through him and his mother&mdash;and a great grief
+ it was and trial, when he died a few years ago in Jamaica, proving by
+ his last act that I was unforgotten. And now I remember how he once
+ said to me: 'Do you beware of ever loving!&mdash;If you do, you will not do
+ it half: it will be for life and death.'
+</p>
+<p>
+ So I put the hair into his locket, which I wear habitually, and which
+ never had hair before&mdash;the natural use of it being for perfume:&mdash;and
+ this is the best perfume for all hours, besides the completing of a
+ prophecy.
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">Your</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">E.B.B.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>R.B. to E.B.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Monday Morning.<br>
+[Post-mark, December 15, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ Every word you write goes to my heart and lives there: let us live so,
+ and die so, if God will. I trust many years hence to begin telling you
+ what I feel now;&mdash;that the beam of the light will have <i>reached</i>
+ you!&mdash;meantime it <i>is</i> here. Let me kiss your forehead, my sweetest,
+ dearest.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Wednesday I am waiting for&mdash;how waiting for!
+</p>
+<p>
+ After all, it seems probable that there was no intentional mischief in
+ that jeweller's management of the ring. The divided gold must have
+ been exposed to fire&mdash;heated thoroughly, perhaps,&mdash;and what became of
+ the contents then! Well, all is safe now, and I go to work again of
+ course. My next act is just done&mdash;that is, <i>being</i> done&mdash;but, what I
+ did not foresee, I cannot bring it, copied, by Wednesday, as my sister
+ went this morning on a visit for the week.
+</p>
+<p>
+ On the matters, the others, I will not think, as you bid me,&mdash;if I can
+ help, at least. But your kind, gentle, good sisters! and the provoking
+ sorrow of the <i>right</i> meaning at bottom of the wrong doing&mdash;wrong to
+ itself and its plain purpose&mdash;and meanwhile, the real tragedy and
+ sacrifice of a life!
+</p>
+<p>
+ If you should see Mr. Kenyon, and can find if he will be disengaged on
+ Wednesday evening, I shall be glad to go in that case.
+</p>
+<p>
+ But I have been writing, as I say, and will leave off this, for the
+ better communing with you. Don't imagine I am unwell; I feel quite
+ well, but a little tired, and the thought of you waits in such
+ readiness! So, may God bless you, beloved!
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">I am all your own</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">R.B.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>E.B.B. to R.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Monday.<br>
+[Post-mark, December 16, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ Mr. Kenyon has not come&mdash;he does not come so often, I think. Did he
+ <i>know</i> from <i>you</i> that you were to see me last Thursday? If he did it
+ might be as well, do you not think? to go to him next week. Will it
+ not seem frequent, otherwise? But if you did <i>not</i> tell him of
+ Thursday distinctly (<i>I</i> did not&mdash;remember!), he might take the
+ Wednesday's visit to be the substitute for rather than the successor
+ of Thursday's: and in that case, why not write a word to him yourself
+ to propose dining with him as he suggested? He really wishes to see
+ you&mdash;of that, I am sure. But you will know what is best to do, and he
+ may come here to-morrow perhaps, and ask a whole set of questions
+ about you; so my right hand may forget its cunning for any good it
+ does. Only don't send messages by <i>me</i>, please!
+</p>
+<p>
+ How happy I am with your letter to-night.
+</p>
+<p>
+ When I had sent away my last letter I began to remember, and could not
+ help smiling to do so, that I had totally forgotten the great subject
+ of my 'fame,' and the oath you administered about it&mdash;totally! Now how
+ do you read that omen? If I forget myself, who is to remember me, do
+ you think?&mdash;except <i>you</i>?&mdash;which brings me where I would stay.
+ Yes&mdash;'yours' it must be, but <i>you</i>, it had better be! But, to leave
+ the vain superstitions, let me go on to assure you that I did mean to
+ answer that part of your former letter, and do mean to behave well and
+ be obedient. Your wish would be enough, even if there could be
+ likelihood without it of my doing nothing ever again. Oh, certainly I
+ have been idle&mdash;it comes of lotus-eating&mdash;and, besides, of sitting too
+ long in the sun. Yet 'idle' may not be the word! silent I have been,
+ through too many thoughts to speak just <i>that</i>!&mdash;As to writing letters
+ and reading manuscripts' filling all my time, why I must lack 'vital
+ energy' indeed&mdash;you do not mean seriously to fancy such a thing of me!
+ For the rest.... Tell me&mdash;Is it your opinion that when the apostle
+ Paul saw the unspeakable things, being snatched up into the third
+ Heavens 'whether in the body or out of the body he could not
+ tell,'&mdash;is it your opinion that, all the week after, he worked
+ particularly hard at the tent-making? For my part, I doubt it.
+</p>
+<p>
+ I would not speak profanely or extravagantly&mdash;it is not the best way
+ to thank God. But to say only that I was in the desert and that I am
+ among the palm-trees, is to say nothing ... because it is easy to
+ <i>understand how</i>, after walking straight on ... on ... furlong after
+ furlong ... dreary day after dreary day, ... one may come to the end
+ of the sand and within sight of the fountain:&mdash;there is nothing
+ miraculous in <i>that</i>, you know!
+</p>
+<p>
+ Yet even in that case, to doubt whether it may not all be <i>mirage</i>,
+ would be the natural first thought, the recurring dream-fear! now
+ would it not? And you can reproach me for <i>my</i> thoughts, as if <i>they</i>
+ were unnatural!
+</p>
+<p>
+ Never mind about the third act&mdash;the advantage is that you will not
+ tire yourself perhaps the next week. What gladness it is that you
+ should really seem better, and how much better <i>that</i> is than even
+ 'Luria.'
+</p>
+<p>
+ Mrs. Jameson came to-day&mdash;but I will tell you.
+</p>
+<p>
+ May God bless you now and always.
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">Your</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">E.B.B.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>E.B.B. to R.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Tuesday Evening.<br>
+[Post-mark, December 17, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ Henrietta had a note from Mr. Kenyon to the effect that he was 'coming
+ to see <i>Ba</i>' to-day if in any way he found it possible. Now he has not
+ come&mdash;and the inference is that he will come to-morrow&mdash;in which case
+ you will be convicted of not wishing to be with him perhaps. So ...
+ would it not be advisable for you to call at his door for a
+ moment&mdash;and <i>before</i> you come here? Think of it. You know it would not
+ do to vex him&mdash;would it?
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">Your&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">E.B.B.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>R.B. to E.B.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Friday Morning.<br>
+[Post-mark, December 19, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ I ought to have written yesterday: so to-day when I need a letter and
+ get none, there is my own fault besides, and the less consolation. A
+ letter from you would light up this sad day. Shall I fancy how, if a
+ letter lay <i>there</i> where I look, rain might fall and winds blow while
+ I listened to you, long after the <i>words</i> had been laid to heart? But
+ here you are in your place&mdash;with me who am your own&mdash;your own&mdash;and so
+ the rhyme joins on,
+</p>
+<blockquote><blockquote><blockquote><blockquote><blockquote><blockquote><p style="text-indent: 0em">She shall speak to me in places lone<br>
+With a low and holy tone&mdash;<br>
+Ay: when I have lit my lamp at night<br>
+She shall be present with my sprite:<br>
+And I will say, whate'er it be,<br>
+Every word she telleth me!
+</p>
+</blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><p style="text-indent: 0em">Now, is that taken from your book? No&mdash;but from <i>my</i> book, which holds
+ my verses as I write them; and as I open it, I read that.
+</p>
+<p>
+ And speaking of verse&mdash;somebody gave me a few days ago that Mr.
+ Lowell's book you once mentioned to me. Anyone who 'admires' <i>you</i>
+ shall have my sympathy at once&mdash;even though he <i>do</i> change the
+ laughing wine-<i>mark</i> into a 'stain' in that perfectly beautiful
+ triplet&mdash;nor am I to be indifferent to his good word for myself
+ (though not very happily connected with the criticism on the epithet
+ in that 'Yorkshire Tragedy'&mdash;which has better things, by the
+ way&mdash;seeing that 'white boy,' in old language, meant just 'good boy,'
+ a general epithet, as Johnson notices in the life of Dryden, whom the
+ schoolmaster Busby was used to class with his 'white boys'&mdash;this is
+ hypercriticism, however). But these American books should not be
+ reprinted here&mdash;one asks, what and where is the class to which they
+ address themselves? for, no doubt, we have our congregations of
+ ignoramuses that enjoy the profoundest ignorance imaginable on the
+ subjects treated of; but <i>these</i> are evidently not the audience Mr.
+ Lowell reckons on; rather, if one may trust the manner of his setting
+ to work, he would propound his doctrine to the class. Always to be
+ found, of spirits instructed up to a certain height and there
+ resting&mdash;vines that run up a prop and there tangle and grow to a
+ knot&mdash;which want supplying with fresh poles; so the provident man
+ brings his bundle into the grounds, and sticks them in laterally or
+ a-top of the others, as the case requires, and all the old stocks go
+ on growing again&mdash;but here, with us, whoever <i>wanted</i> Chaucer, or
+ Chapman, or Ford, got him long ago&mdash;what else have Lamb, and
+ Coleridge, and Hazlitt and Hunt and so on to the end of their
+ generations ... what else been doing this many a year? What one
+ passage of all these, cited with the very air of a Columbus, but has
+ been known to all who know anything of poetry this many, many a year?
+ The others, who don't know anything, are the stocks that have got to
+ <i>shoot</i>, not climb higher&mdash;<i>compost</i>, they want in the first place!
+ Ford's and Crashaw's rival Nightingales&mdash;why they have been
+ dissertated on by Wordsworth and Coleridge, then by Lamb and Hazlitt,
+ then worked to death by Hunt, who printed them entire and quoted them
+ to pieces again, in every periodical he was ever engaged upon; and yet
+ after all, here 'Philip'&mdash;'must read' (out of a roll of dropping
+ papers with yellow ink tracings, so old!) something at which 'John'
+ claps his hands and says 'Really&mdash;that these ancients should own so
+ much wit &amp;c.'! The <i>passage</i> no longer looks its fresh self after this
+ veritable passage from hand to hand: as when, in old dances, the belle
+ began the figure with her own partner, and by him was transferred to
+ the next, and so to the next&mdash;<i>they</i> ever <i>beginning</i> with all the old
+ alacrity and spirit; but she bearing a still-accumulating weight of
+ tokens of gallantry, and none the better for every fresh pushing and
+ shoving and pulling and hauling&mdash;till, at the bottom of the room&mdash;
+</p>
+<p>
+ To which Mr. Lowell might say, that&mdash;No, I will say the true thing
+ against myself&mdash;and it is, that when I turn from what is in my mind,
+ and determine to write about anybody's book to avoid writing that I
+ love and love and love again my own, dearest love&mdash;because of the
+ cuckoo-song of it,&mdash;<i>then</i>, I shall be in no better humour with that
+ book than with Mr. Lowell's!
+</p>
+<p>
+ But I <i>have</i> a new thing to say or sing&mdash;you never before heard me
+ love and bless and send my heart after&mdash;'Ba'&mdash;did you? Ba ... and
+ that is you! I <SPAN class="sc-ex">tried</span> ... (more than <i>wanted</i>) to call you <i>that</i>, on
+ Wednesday! I have a flower here&mdash;rather, a tree, a mimosa, which must
+ be turned and turned, the side to the light changing in a little time
+ to the <i>leafy</i> side, where all the fans lean and spread ... so I turn
+ your name to me, that side I have not last seen: you cannot tell how I
+ feel glad that you will not part with the name&mdash;Barrett&mdash;seeing you
+ have two of the same&mdash;and must always, moreover, remain my EBB!
+</p>
+<p>
+ Dearest 'E.B.C.'&mdash;no, no! and so it will never be!
+</p>
+<p>
+ Have you seen Mr. Kenyon? I did not write ... knowing that such a
+ procedure would draw the kind sure letter in return, with the
+ invitation &amp;c., as if I had asked for it! I had perhaps better call on
+ him some morning very early.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Bless you, my own sweetest. You will write to me, I know in my heart!
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">Ever may God bless you!</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">R.B.
+</p>
+<h3><i>E.B.B. to R.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Thursday Evening.<br>
+[Post-mark, December 20, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ Dearest, you know how to say what makes me happiest, you who never
+ think, you say, of making me happy! For my part I do not think of it
+ either; I simply understand that you <i>are</i> my happiness, and that
+ therefore you could not make another happiness for me, such as would
+ be worth having&mdash;not even <i>you</i>! Why, how could you? <i>That</i> was in my
+ mind to speak yesterday, but I could not speak it&mdash;to write it, is
+ easier.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Talking of happiness&mdash;shall I tell you? Promise not to be angry and I
+ will tell you. I have thought sometimes that, if I considered myself
+ wholly, I should choose to die this winter&mdash;now&mdash;before I had
+ disappointed you in anything. But because you are better and dearer
+ and more to be considered than I, I do <i>not</i> choose it. I <i>cannot</i>
+ choose to give you any pain, even on the chance of its being a less
+ pain, a less evil, than what may follow perhaps (who can say?), if I
+ should prove the burden of your life.
+</p>
+<p>
+ For if you make me happy with some words, you frighten me with
+ others&mdash;as with the extravagance yesterday&mdash;and seriously&mdash;<i>too</i>
+ seriously, when the moment for smiling at them is past&mdash;I am
+ frightened, I tremble! When you come to know me as well as I know
+ myself, what can save me, do you think, from disappointing and
+ displeasing you? I ask the question, and find no answer.
+</p>
+<p>
+ It is a poor answer, to say that I can do one thing well ... that I
+ have one capacity largely. On points of the general affections, I have
+ in thought applied to myself the words of Mme. de Stael, not
+ fretfully, I hope, not complainingly, I am sure (I can thank God for
+ most affectionate friends!) not complainingly, yet mournfully and in
+ profound conviction&mdash;those words&mdash;'<i>jamais je n'ai pas été aimée comme
+ j'aime</i>.' The capacity of loving is the largest of my powers I
+ think&mdash;I thought so before knowing you&mdash;and one form of feeling. And
+ although any woman might love you&mdash;<i>every</i> woman,&mdash;with understanding
+ enough to discern you by&mdash;(oh, do not fancy that I am unduly
+ magnifying mine office) yet I persist in persuading myself that!
+ Because I have the capacity, as I said&mdash;and besides I owe more to you
+ than others could, it seems to me: let me boast of it. To many, you
+ might be better than all things while one of all things: to me you are
+ instead of all&mdash;to many, a crowning happiness&mdash;to me, the happiness
+ itself. From out of the deep dark pits men see the stars more
+ gloriously&mdash;and <i>de profundis amavi</i>&mdash;
+</p>
+<p>
+ It is a very poor answer! Almost as poor an answer as yours could be
+ if I were to ask you to teach me to please you always; or rather, how
+ not to displease you, disappoint you, vex you&mdash;what if all those
+ things were in my fate?
+</p>
+<p>
+ And&mdash;(to begin!)&mdash;<i>I</i> am disappointed to-night. I expected a letter
+ which does not come&mdash;and I had felt so sure of having a letter
+ to-night ... unreasonably sure perhaps, which means doubly sure.
+</p>
+<p>
+ <i>Friday.</i>&mdash;Remember you have had two notes of mine, and that it is
+ certainly not my turn to write, though I am writing.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Scarcely you had gone on Wednesday when Mr. Kenyon came. It seemed
+ best to me, you know, that you should go&mdash;I had the presentiment of
+ his footsteps&mdash;and so near they were, that if you had looked up the
+ street in leaving the door, you must have seen him! Of course I told
+ him of your having been here and also at his house; whereupon he
+ enquired eagerly if you meant to dine with him, seeming disappointed
+ by my negative. 'Now I had told him,' he said ... and murmured on to
+ himself loud enough for me to hear, that 'it would have been a
+ peculiar pleasure &amp;c.' The reason I have not seen him lately is the
+ eternal 'business,' just as you thought, and he means to come 'oftener
+ now,' so nothing is wrong as I half thought.
+</p>
+<p>
+ As your letter does not come it is a good opportunity for asking what
+ sort of ill humour, or (to be more correct) bad temper, you most
+ particularly admire&mdash;sulkiness?&mdash;the divine gift of sitting aloof in a
+ cloud like any god for three weeks together perhaps&mdash;pettishness? ...
+ which will get you up a storm about a crooked pin or a straight one
+ either? obstinacy?&mdash;which is an agreeable form of temper I can assure
+ you, and describes itself&mdash;or the good open passion which lies on the
+ floor and kicks, like one of my cousins?&mdash;Certainly I prefer the last,
+ and should, I think, prefer it (as an evil), even if it were not the
+ born weakness of my own nature&mdash;though I humbly confess (to <i>you</i>, who
+ seem to think differently of these things) that never since I was a
+ child have I upset all the chairs and tables and thrown the books
+ about the room in a fury&mdash;I am afraid I do not even 'kick,' like my
+ cousin, now. Those demonstrations were all done by the 'light of other
+ days'&mdash;not a very full light, I used to be accustomed to think:&mdash;but
+ <i>you</i>,&mdash;<i>you</i> think otherwise, <i>you</i> take a fury to be the opposite of
+ 'indifference,' as if there could be no such thing as self-control!
+ Now for my part, I do believe that the worst-tempered persons in the
+ world are less so through sensibility than selfishness&mdash;they spare
+ nobody's heart, on the ground of being themselves pricked by a straw.
+ Now see if it isn't so. What, after all, is a good temper but
+ generosity in trifles&mdash;and what, without it, is the happiness of life?
+ We have only to look round us. I <i>saw</i> a woman, once, burst into
+ tears, because her husband cut the bread and butter too thick. I saw
+ <i>that</i> with my own eyes. Was it <i>sensibility</i>, I wonder! They were at
+ least real tears and ran down her cheeks. 'You <i>always</i> do it'! she
+ said.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Why how you must sympathize with the heroes and heroines of the French
+ romances (<i>do</i> you sympathize with them very much?) when at the
+ slightest provocation they break up the tables and chairs, (a degree
+ beyond the deeds of my childhood!&mdash;<i>I</i> only used to upset them) break
+ up the tables and chairs and chiffoniers, and dash the china to atoms.
+ The men <i>do</i> the furniture, and the women the porcelain: and pray
+ observe that they always set about this as a matter of course! When
+ they have broken everything in the room, they sink down quite (and
+ very naturally) <i>abattus</i>. I remember a particular case of a hero of
+ Frederic Soulié's, who, in the course of an 'emotion,' takes up a
+ chair <i>unconsciously</i>, and breaks it into very small pieces, and then
+ proceeds with his soliloquy. Well!&mdash;the clearest idea this excites in
+ <i>me</i>, is of the low condition in Paris, of moral government and of
+ upholstery. Because&mdash;just consider for yourself&mdash;how <i>you</i> would
+ succeed in breaking to pieces even a three-legged stool if it were
+ properly put together&mdash;as stools are in England&mdash;just yourself,
+ without a hammer and a screw! You might work at it <i>comme quatre</i>, and
+ find it hard to finish, I imagine. And then as a demonstration, a
+ child of six years old might demonstrate just so (in his sphere) and
+ be whipped accordingly.
+</p>
+<p>
+ How I go on writing!&mdash;and you, who do not write at all!&mdash;two extremes,
+ one set against the other.
+</p>
+<p>
+ But I must say, though in ever such an ill temper (which you know is
+ just the time to select for writing a panegyric upon good temper) that
+ I am glad you do not despise my own right name too much, because I
+ never was called Elizabeth by any one who loved me at all, and I
+ accept the omen. So little it seems my name that if a voice said
+ suddenly 'Elizabeth,' I should as soon turn round as my sisters would
+ ... no sooner. Only, my own right name has been complained of for want
+ of euphony ... <i>Ba</i> ... now and then it has&mdash;and Mr. Boyd makes a
+ compromise and calls me <i>Elibet</i>, because nothing could induce him to
+ desecrate his organs accustomed to Attic harmonies, with a <i>Ba</i>. So I
+ am glad, and accept the omen.
+</p>
+<p>
+ But I give you no credit for not thinking that I may forget you ... I!
+ As if you did not see the difference! Why, <i>I</i> could not even forget
+ to <i>write</i> to <i>you</i>, observe!&mdash;
+</p>
+<p>
+ Whenever you write, say how you are. Were you wet on Wednesday?
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">Your own&mdash;
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>R.B. to E.B.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Saturday.<br>
+[Post-mark, December 20, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ I do not, nor will not think, dearest, of ever 'making you happy'&mdash;I
+ can imagine no way of working that end, which does not go straight to
+ my own truest, only true happiness&mdash;yet in every such effort there is
+ implied some distinction, some supererogatory grace, or why speak of
+ it at all? <i>You</i> it is, are my happiness, and all that ever can be:
+ <SPAN class="sc-ex">you</span>&mdash;dearest!
+</p>
+<p>
+ But never, if you would not, what you will not do I know, never revert
+ to <i>that</i> frightful wish. 'Disappoint me?' 'I speak what I know and
+ testify what I have seen'&mdash;you shall 'mystery' again and again&mdash;I do
+ not dispute that, but do not <i>you</i> dispute, neither, that mysteries
+ are. But it is simply because I do most justice to the mystical part
+ of what I feel for you, because I consent to lay most stress on that
+ fact of facts that I love you, beyond admiration, and respect, and
+ esteem and affection even, and do not adduce any reason which stops
+ short of accounting for <i>that</i>, whatever else it would account for,
+ because I do this, in pure logical justice&mdash;<i>you</i> are able to turn and
+ wonder (if you <i>do ... now</i>) what causes it all! My love, only wait,
+ only believe in me, and it cannot be but I shall, little by little,
+ become known to you&mdash;after long years, perhaps, but still one day: I
+ <i>would</i> say <i>this</i> now&mdash;but I will write more to-morrow. God bless my
+ sweetest&mdash;ever, love, I am your
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">R.B.
+</p>
+<p>
+ But my letter came last night, did it not?
+</p>
+<p>
+ Another thing&mdash;no, <i>to-morrow</i>&mdash;for time presses, and, in all cases,
+ <i>Tuesday</i>&mdash;remember!
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>E.B.B. to R.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Saturday.<br>
+[Post-mark, December 20, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ I have your letter now, and now I am sorry I sent mine. If I wrote
+ that you had 'forgotten to write,' I did not mean it; not a word! If I
+ had meant it I should not have written it. But it would have been
+ better for every reason to have waited just a little longer before
+ writing at all. A besetting sin of mine is an impatience which makes
+ people laugh when it does not entangle their silks, pull their knots
+ tighter, and tear their books in cutting them open.
+</p>
+<p>
+ How right you are about Mr. Lowell! He has a refined fancy and is
+ graceful for an American critic, but the truth is, otherwise, that he
+ knows nothing of English poetry or the next thing to nothing, and has
+ merely had a dream of the early dramatists. The amount of his reading
+ in that direction is an article in the <i>Retrospective Review</i> which
+ contains extracts; and he re-extracts the extracts, re-quotes the
+ quotations, and, 'a pede Herculem,' from the foot infers the man, or
+ rather from the sandal-string of the foot, infers and judges the soul
+ of the man&mdash;it is comparative anatomy under the most speculative
+ conditions. How a writer of his talents and pretensions could make up
+ his mind to make up a book on such slight substratum, is a curious
+ proof of the state of literature in America. Do you not think so? Why
+ a lecturer on the English Dramatists for a 'Young Ladies' academy'
+ here in England, might take it to be necessary to have better
+ information than he could gather from an odd volume of an old review!
+ And then, Mr. Lowell's naïveté in showing his authority,&mdash;as if the
+ Elizabethan poets lay mouldering in inaccessible manuscript somewhere
+ below the lowest deep of Shakespeare's grave,&mdash;is curious beyond the
+ rest! Altogether, the fact is an epigram on the surface-literature of
+ America. As you say, their books do not suit us:&mdash;Mrs. Markham might
+ as well send her compendium of the History of France to M. Thiers. If
+ they <i>knew</i> more they could not give parsley crowns to their own
+ native poets when there is greater merit among the rabbits. Mrs.
+ Sigourney has just sent me&mdash;just this morning&mdash;her 'Scenes in my
+ Native Land' and, peeping between the uncut leaves, I read of the poet
+ Hillhouse, of 'sublime spirit and Miltonic energy,' standing in 'the
+ temple of Fame' as if it were built on purpose for him. I suppose he
+ is like most of the American poets, who are shadows of the true, as
+ flat as a shadow, as colourless as a shadow, as lifeless and as
+ transitory. Mr. Lowell himself is, in his verse-books, poetical, if
+ not a poet&mdash;and certainly this little book we are talking of is
+ grateful enough in some ways&mdash;you would call it a <i>pretty book</i>&mdash;would
+ you not? Two or three letters I have had from him ... all very
+ kind!&mdash;and <i>that</i> reminds me, alas! of some ineffable ingratitude on
+ my own part! When one's conscience grows too heavy, there is nothing
+ for it but to throw it away!&mdash;
+</p>
+<p>
+ Do you remember how I tried to tell you what he said of you, and how
+ you would not let me?
+</p>
+<p>
+ Mr. Mathews said of <i>him</i>, having met him once in society, that he was
+ the concentration of conceit in appearance and manner. But since then
+ they seem to be on better terms.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Where is the meaning, pray, of E.B.<i>C.</i>? <i>your</i> meaning, I mean?
+</p>
+<p>
+ My true initials are E.B.M.B.&mdash;my long name, as opposed to my short
+ one, being Elizabeth Barrett Moulton Barrett!&mdash;there's a full length
+ to take away one's breath!&mdash;Christian name ... Elizabeth
+ Barrett:&mdash;surname, Moulton Barrett. So long it is, that to make it
+ portable, I fell into the habit of doubling it up and packing it
+ closely, ... and of forgetting that I was a <i>Moulton</i>, altogether. One
+ might as well write the alphabet as all four initials. Yet our
+ family-name is <i>Moulton Barrett</i>, and my brothers reproach me
+ sometimes for sacrificing the governorship of an old town in Norfolk
+ with a little honourable verdigris from the Heralds' Office. As if I
+ cared for the <i>Retrospective Review</i>! Nevertheless it is true that I
+ would give ten towns in Norfolk (if I had them) to own some purer
+ lineage than that of the blood of the slave! Cursed we are from
+ generation to generation!&mdash;I seem to hear the 'Commination Service.'
+</p>
+<p>
+ May God bless you always, always! beyond the always of this world!&mdash;
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">Your&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">E.B.B.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Mr. Dickens's 'Cricket' sings repetitions, and, with considerable
+ beauty, is extravagant. It does not appear to me by any means one of
+ his most successful productions, though quite free from what was
+ reproached as bitterness and one-sidedness, last year.
+</p>
+<p>
+ You do not say how you are&mdash;not a word! And you are wrong in saying
+ that you 'ought to have written'&mdash;as if 'ought' could be in place
+ <i>so</i>! You <i>never 'ought' to write to me you know</i>! or rather ... if
+ you ever think you ought, you ought not! Which is a speaking of
+ mysteries on my part!
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>R.B. to E.B.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Sunday Night.<br>
+[Post-mark, December 22, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ Now, '<i>ought</i>' you to be 'sorry you sent that letter,' which made, and
+ makes me so happy&mdash;so happy&mdash;can you bring yourself to turn round and
+ tell one you have so blessed with your bounty that there was a
+ mistake, and you meant only half that largess? If you are not sensible
+ that you <i>do</i> make me most happy by such letters, and do not warm in
+ the reflection of your own rays, then I <i>do</i> give up indeed the last
+ chance of procuring <i>you</i> happiness. My own 'ought,' which you object
+ to, shall be withdrawn&mdash;being only a pure bit of selfishness; I felt,
+ in missing the letter of yours, next day, that I <i>might</i> have drawn it
+ down by one of mine,&mdash;if I had begged never so gently, the gold would
+ have fallen&mdash;<i>there</i> was my omitted duty to myself which you properly
+ blame. I should stand silently and wait and be sure of the
+ ever-remembering goodness.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Let me count my gold now&mdash;and rub off any speck that stays the full
+ shining. First&mdash;<i>that thought</i> ... I told you; I pray you, pray you,
+ sweet&mdash;never that again&mdash;or what leads never so remotely or indirectly
+ to it! On <i>your own fancied ground</i>, the fulfilment would be of
+ necessity fraught with every woe that can fall in this life. I am
+ yours for ever&mdash;if you are not <i>here</i>, with me&mdash;what then? Say, you
+ take all of yourself away but just enough to live on; then, <i>that</i>
+ defeats every kind purpose ... as if you cut away all the ground from
+ my feet but so much as serves for bare standing room ... why still, I
+ <i>stand</i> there&mdash;and is it the better that I have no broader space,
+ when off <i>that</i> you cannot force me? I have your memory, the knowledge
+ of you, the idea of you printed into my heart and brain,&mdash;on that, I
+ can live my life&mdash;but it is for you, the dear, utterly generous
+ creature I know you, to give me more and more beyond mere life&mdash;to
+ extend life and deepen it&mdash;as you do, and will do. Oh, <i>how</i> I love
+ you when I think of the entire truthfulness of your generosity to
+ me&mdash;how, meaning and willing to <i>give</i>, you gave <i>nobly</i>! Do you think
+ I have not seen in this world how women who <i>do</i> love will manage to
+ confer that gift on occasion? And shall I allow myself to fancy how
+ much alloy such pure gold as <i>your</i> love would have rendered
+ endurable? Yet it came, virgin ore, to complete my fortune! And what
+ but this makes me confident and happy? <i>Can</i> I take a lesson by your
+ fancies, and begin frightening myself with saying ... 'But if she saw
+ all the world&mdash;the worthier, better men there ... those who would' &amp;c.
+ &amp;c. No, I think of the great, dear <i>gift</i> that it was; how I '<i>won</i>'
+ <SPAN class="sc-ex">nothing</span> (the hateful word, and <i>French</i> thought)&mdash;did nothing by my
+ own arts or cleverness in the matter ... so what pretence have the
+ <i>more</i> artful or more clever for:&mdash;but I cannot write out this
+ folly&mdash;I am yours for ever, with the utmost sense of gratitude&mdash;to say
+ I would give you my life joyfully is little.... I would, I hope, do
+ that for two or three other people&mdash;but I am not conscious of any
+ imaginable point in which I would not implicitly devote my whole self
+ to you&mdash;be disposed of by you as for the best. There! It is not to be
+ spoken of&mdash;let me <i>live</i> it into proof, beloved!
+</p>
+<p>
+ And for 'disappointment and a burden' ... now&mdash;let us get quite away
+ from ourselves, and not see one of the filaments, but only the <i>cords</i>
+ of love with the world's horny eye. Have we such jarring tastes, then?
+ Does your inordinate attachment to gay life interfere with my deep
+ passion for society? 'Have they common sympathy in each other's
+ pursuits?'&mdash;always asks Mrs. Tomkins! Well, here was I when you knew
+ me, fixed in my way of life, meaning with God's help to write what
+ may be written and so die at peace with myself so far. Can you help me
+ or no? Do you <i>not</i> help me so much that, if you saw the more likely
+ peril for poor human nature, you would say, 'He will be jealous of all
+ the help coming from me,&mdash;none from him to me!'&mdash;And <i>that would</i> be a
+ consequence of the help, all-too-great for hope of return, with any
+ one less possessed than I with the exquisiteness of being
+ <i>transcended</i> and the <i>blest</i> one.
+</p>
+<p>
+ But&mdash;'here comes the Selah and the voice is hushed'&mdash;I will speak of
+ other things. When we are together one day&mdash;the days I believe in&mdash;I
+ mean to set about that reconsidering 'Sordello'&mdash;it has always been
+ rather on my mind&mdash;but yesterday I was reading the 'Purgatorio' and
+ the first speech of the group of which Sordello makes one struck me
+ with a new significance, as well describing the man and his purpose
+ and fate in my own poem&mdash;see; one of the burthened, contorted souls
+ tells Virgil and Dante&mdash;
+</p>
+<blockquote><blockquote><blockquote><blockquote><blockquote><blockquote><p style="text-indent: 0em">Noi fummo già tutti per forza morti,<br>
+E <i>peccatori infin' all' ultim' ora</i>:<br>
+<SPAN class="sc-ex">Quivi</span>&mdash;<i>lume del ciel ne fece accorti<br>
+Si chè, pentendo e perdonando, fora<br>
+Di vita uscimmo a Dio pacificati<br>
+Che del disio di se veder n'accora.</i><a href="#note-23"><b>23</b></a>
+</p>
+</blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote>
+<p>Which is just my Sordello's story ... could I '<i>do</i>' it off hand, I
+ wonder&mdash;
+</p>
+<blockquote><blockquote><blockquote><blockquote><blockquote><blockquote><p style="text-indent: 0em">And sinners were we to the extreme hour;<br>
+ <i>Then</i>, light from heaven fell, making us aware,<br>
+So that, repenting us and pardoned, out<br>
+Of life we passed to God, at peace with Him<br>
+Who fills the heart with yearning Him to see.
+</p>
+</blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote>
+<p>
+ There were many singular incidents attending my work on that
+ subject&mdash;thus, quite at the end, I found out there <i>was printed</i> and
+ not published, a little historical tract by a Count V&mdash;&mdash; something,
+ called 'Sordello'&mdash;with the motto 'Post fata resurgam'! I hope he
+ prophesied. The main of this&mdash;biographical notices&mdash;is extracted by
+ Muratori, I think. Last year when I set foot in Naples I found after a
+ few minutes that at some theatre, that night, the opera was to be 'one
+ act of Sordello' and I never looked twice, nor expended a couple of
+ carlines on the <i>libretto</i>!
+</p>
+<p>
+ I wanted to tell you, in last letter, that when I spoke of people's
+ tempers <i>you</i> have no concern with 'people'&mdash;I do not glance obliquely
+ at <i>your</i> temper&mdash;either to discover it, or praise it, or adapt myself
+ to it. I speak of the relation one sees in other cases&mdash;how one
+ opposes passionate foolish people, but hates cold clever people who
+ take quite care enough of themselves. I myself am born supremely
+ passionate&mdash;so I was born with light yellow hair: all changes&mdash;that is
+ the passion changes its direction and, taking a channel large enough,
+ looks calmer, perhaps, than it should&mdash;and all my sympathies go with
+ quiet strength, of course&mdash;but I know what the other kind is. As for
+ the breakages of chairs, and the appreciation of Parisian <i>meubles</i>;
+ manibus, pedibusque descendo in tuam sententiam, Ba, mi ocelle! ('What
+ was E.B. C?' why, the first letter after, and <i>not</i>, E.B. <i>B</i>, my own
+ <i>B</i>! There was no latent meaning in the C&mdash;but I had no inclination to
+ go on to D, or E, for instance).
+</p>
+<p>
+ And so, love, Tuesday is to be our day&mdash;one day more&mdash;and then! And
+ meanwhile '<i>care</i>' for me! a good word for you&mdash;but <i>my</i> care, what is
+ that! One day I aspire to <i>care</i>, though! I shall not go away at any
+ dear Mr. K.'s coming! They call me down-stairs to supper&mdash;and my fire
+ is out, and you keep me from feeling cold and yet ask if I am well?
+ Yes, well&mdash;yes, happy&mdash;and your own ever&mdash;I must bid God bless
+ you&mdash;dearest!
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">R.B.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>E.B.B. to R.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Sunday Night.<br>
+[Post-mark, December 24, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ But did I dispute? Surely not. Surely I believe in you and in
+ 'mysteries.' Surely I prefer the no-reason to ever so much rationalism
+ ... (rationalism and infidelity go together they say!). All which I
+ may do, and be afraid sometimes notwithstanding, and when you
+ overpraise me (<i>not</i> over<i>love</i>) I must be frightened as I told you.
+</p>
+<p>
+ It is with me as with the theologians. I believe in you and can be
+ happy and safe <i>so</i>; but when my 'personal merits' come into question
+ in any way, even the least, ... why then the position grows untenable:
+ it is no more 'of grace.'
+</p>
+<p>
+ Do I tease you as I tease myself sometimes? But do not wrong me in
+ turn! Do not keep repeating that 'after long years' I shall know
+ you&mdash;know you!&mdash;as if I did not without the years. If you are forced
+ to refer me to those long ears, I must deserve the thistles besides.
+ The thistles are the corollary.
+</p>
+<p>
+ For it is obvious&mdash;manifest&mdash;that I cannot doubt of you, that I may
+ doubt of myself, of happiness, of the whole world,&mdash;but of
+ <i>you</i>&mdash;<i>not</i>: it is obvious that if I could doubt of you and <i>act so</i>
+ I should be a very idiot, or worse indeed. And <i>you</i> ... you think I
+ doubt of you whenever I make an interjection!&mdash;now do you not? And is
+ it reasonable?&mdash;Of <i>you</i>, I mean?
+</p>
+<p>
+ <i>Monday.</i>&mdash;For my part, you must admit it to be too possible that you
+ may be, as I say, 'disappointed' in me&mdash;it <i>is</i> too possible. And if
+ it does me good to say so, even now perhaps ... if it is mere weakness
+ to say so and simply torments you, why do <i>you</i> be magnanimous and
+ forgive <i>that</i> ... let it pass as a weakness and forgive it <i>so</i>.
+ Often I think painful things which I do not tell you and....
+</p>
+<p>
+ While I write, your letter comes. Kindest of you it was, to write me
+ such a letter, when I expected scarcely the shadow of one!&mdash;this makes
+ up for the other letter which I expected unreasonably and which you
+ '<i>ought not</i>' to have written, as was proved afterwards. And now why
+ should I go on with that sentence? What had I to say of 'painful
+ things,' I wonder? all the painful things seem gone ... vanished. I
+ forget what I had to say. Only do you still think of this, dearest
+ beloved; that I sit here in the dark but for <i>you</i>, and that the light
+ you bring me (from <i>my</i> fault!&mdash;from the nature of <i>my</i> darkness!) is
+ not a settled light as when you open the shutters in the morning, but
+ a light made by candles which burn some of them longer and some
+ shorter, and some brighter and briefer, at once&mdash;being 'double-wicks,'
+ and that there is an intermission for a moment now and then between
+ the dropping of the old light into the socket and the lighting of the
+ new. Every letter of yours is a new light which burns so many hours
+ ... and <i>then</i>!&mdash;I am morbid, you see&mdash;or call it by what name you
+ like ... too wise or too foolish. 'If the light of the body is
+ darkness, how great is that darkness.' Yet even when I grow too wise,
+ I admit always that while you love me it is an answer to all. And I am
+ never so much too foolish as to wish to be worthier for my own
+ sake&mdash;only for yours:&mdash;not for my own sake, since I am content to owe
+ all things to you.
+</p>
+<p>
+ And it could be so much to you to lose me!&mdash;and you say so,&mdash;and
+ <i>then</i> think it needful to tell me not to think the other thought! As
+ if <i>that</i> were possible! Do you remember what you said once of the
+ flowers?&mdash;that you 'felt a respect for them when they had passed out
+ of your hands.' And must it not be so with my life, which if you
+ choose to have it, must be respected too? Much more with my life!
+ Also, see that I, who had my warmest affections on the other side of
+ the grave, feel that it is otherwise with me now&mdash;quite otherwise. I
+ did not like it at first to be so much otherwise. And I could not have
+ had any such thought through a weariness of life or any of my old
+ motives, but simply to escape the 'risk' I told you of. Should I have
+ said to you instead of it ... '<i>Love me for ever</i>'? Well then, ... I
+ <i>do</i>.
+</p>
+<p>
+ As to my 'helping' you, my help is in your fancy; and if you go on
+ with the fancy, I perfectly understand that it will be as good as
+ deeds. We <i>have</i> sympathy too&mdash;we walk one way&mdash;oh, I do not forget
+ the advantages. Only Mrs. Tomkins's ideas of happiness are below my
+ ambition for you.
+</p>
+<p>
+ So often as I have said (it reminds me) that in this situation I
+ should be more exacting than any other woman&mdash;so often I have said it:
+ and so different everything is from what I thought it would be!
+ Because if I am exacting it is for <i>you</i> and not for <i>me</i>&mdash;it is
+ altogether for <i>you</i>&mdash;you understand <i>that</i>, dearest of all ... it is
+ for <i>you wholly</i>. It never crosses my thought, in a lightning even,
+ the question whether I may be happy so and so&mdash;<i>I</i>. It is the other
+ question which comes always&mdash;too often for peace.
+</p>
+<p>
+ People used to say to me, 'You expect too much&mdash;you are too romantic.'
+ And my answer always was that 'I could not expect too much when I
+ expected nothing at all' ... which was the truth&mdash;for I never thought
+ (and how often I have <i>said that</i>!) I never thought that anyone whom
+ <i>I</i> could love, would stoop to love <i>me</i> ... the two things seemed
+ clearly incompatible to my understanding.
+</p>
+<p>
+ And now when it comes in a miracle, you wonder at me for looking
+ twice, thrice, four times, to see if it comes through ivory or <i>horn</i>.
+ You wonder that it should seem to me at first all illusion&mdash;illusion
+ for you,&mdash;illusion for me as a consequence. But how natural.
+</p>
+<p>
+ It is true of me&mdash;very true&mdash;that I have not a high appreciation of
+ what passes in the world (and not merely the Tomkins-world!) under the
+ name of love; and that a distrust of the thing had grown to be a habit
+ of mind with me when I knew you first. It has appeared to me, through
+ all the seclusion of my life and the narrow experience it admitted
+ of, that in nothing men&mdash;and women too&mdash;were so apt to mistake their
+ own feelings, as in this one thing. Putting <i>falseness</i> quite on one
+ side, quite out of sight and consideration, an honest mistaking of
+ feeling appears wonderfully common, and no mistake has such frightful
+ results&mdash;none can. Self-love and generosity, a mistake may come from
+ either&mdash;from pity, from admiration, from any blind impulse&mdash;oh, when I
+ look at the histories of my own female friends&mdash;to go no step further!
+ And if it is true of the <i>women</i>, what must the other side be? To see
+ the marriages which are made every day! worse than solitudes and more
+ desolate! In the case of the two happiest I ever knew, one of the
+ husbands said in confidence to a brother of mine&mdash;not much in
+ confidence or I should not have heard it, but in a sort of smoking
+ frankness,&mdash;that he had 'ruined his prospects by marrying'; and the
+ other said to himself at the very moment of professing an
+ extraordinary happiness, ... 'But I should have done as well if I had
+ not married <i>her</i>.'
+</p>
+<p>
+ Then for the falseness&mdash;the first time I ever, in my own experience,
+ heard that word which rhymes to glove and comes as easily off and on
+ (on some hands!)&mdash;it was from a man of whose attentions to another
+ woman I was at that <i>time her confidante</i>. I was bound so to silence
+ for her sake, that I could not even speak the scorn that was in
+ me&mdash;and in fact my uppermost feeling was a sort of horror ... a
+ terror&mdash;for I was very young then, and the world did, at the moment,
+ look ghastly!
+</p>
+<p>
+ The falseness and the calculations!&mdash;why how can you, who are <i>just</i>,
+ <i>blame women</i> ... when you must know what the 'system' of man is
+ towards them,&mdash;and of men not ungenerous otherwise? Why are women to
+ be blamed if they act as if they had to do with swindlers?&mdash;is it not
+ the mere instinct of preservation which makes them do it? These make
+ women what they are. And your 'honourable men,' the most loyal of
+ them, (for instance) is it not a rule with them (unless when taken
+ unaware through a want of self-government) to force a woman (trying
+ all means) to force a woman to stand committed in her affections ...
+ (they with their feet lifted all the time to trample on her for want
+ of delicacy) before <i>they</i> risk the pin-prick to their own personal
+ pitiful vanities? Oh&mdash;to see how these things are set about by <i>men</i>!
+ to see how a man carefully holding up on each side the skirts of an
+ embroidered vanity to keep it quite safe from the wet, will contrive
+ to tell you in so many words that he ... might love you if the sun
+ shone! And women are to be blamed! Why there are, to be sure, cold and
+ heartless, light and changeable, ungenerous and calculating women in
+ the world!&mdash;that is sure. But for the most part, they are only what
+ they are made ... and far better than the nature of the making ... of
+ that I am confident. The loyal make the loyal, the disloyal the
+ disloyal. And I give no more discredit to those women you speak of,
+ than I myself can take any credit in this thing&mdash;I. Because who could
+ be disloyal with <i>you</i> ... with whatever corrupt inclination? <i>you</i>,
+ who are the noblest of all? If you judge me so, ... it is my privilege
+ rather than my merit ... as I feel of myself.
+</p>
+<p>
+ <i>Wednesday.</i>&mdash;All but the last few lines of all this was written
+ before I saw you yesterday, ever dearest&mdash;and since, I have been
+ reading your third act which is perfectly noble and worthy of you both
+ in the conception and expression, and carries the reader on
+ triumphantly ... to speak for one reader. It seems to me too that the
+ language is freer&mdash;there is less inversion and more breadth of rhythm.
+ It just strikes me so for the first impression. At any rate the
+ interest grows and grows. You have a secret about Domizia, I
+ guess&mdash;which will not be told till the last perhaps. And that poor,
+ noble Luria, who will be equal to the leap ... as it is easy to see.
+ It is full, altogether, of magnanimities;&mdash;noble, and nobly put. I
+ will go on with my notes, and those, you shall have at once ... I mean
+ together ... presently. And don't hurry and chafe yourself for the
+ fourth act&mdash;now that you are better! To be ill again&mdash;think what that
+ would be! Luria will be great now whatever you do&mdash;or whatever you do
+ <i>not</i>. Will he not?
+</p>
+<p>
+ And never, never for a moment (I quite forgot to tell you) did I fancy
+ that you were talking at <i>me</i> in the temper-observations&mdash;never. It
+ was the most unprovoked egotism, all that I told you of my temper; for
+ certainly I never suspected you of asking questions so. I was simply
+ amused a little by what you said, and thought to myself (if you <i>will</i>
+ know my thoughts on that serious subject) that you had probably lived
+ among very good-tempered persons, to hold such an opinion about the
+ innocuousness of ill-temper. It was all I thought, indeed. Now to
+ fancy that I was capable of suspecting you of such a manoeuvre! Why
+ you would have <i>asked</i> me directly;&mdash;if you had wished 'curiously to
+ enquire.'
+</p>
+<p>
+ An excellent solemn chiming, the passage from Dante makes with your
+ 'Sordello,' and the 'Sordello' <i>deserves</i> the labour which it needs,
+ to make it appear the great work it is. I think that the principle of
+ association is too subtly in movement throughout it&mdash;so that <i>while</i>
+ you are going straight forward you go at the same time round and
+ round, until the progress involved in the motion is lost sight of by
+ the lookers on. Or did I tell you that before?
+</p>
+<p>
+ You have heard, I suppose, how Dickens's 'Cricket' sells by nineteen
+ thousand copies at a time, though he takes Michael Angelo to be 'a
+ humbug'&mdash;or for 'though' read 'because.' Tell me of Mr. Kenyon's
+ dinner and Moxon?
+</p>
+<p>
+ Is not this an infinite letter? I shall hear from you, I hope.... I
+ <i>ask</i> you to let me hear soon. I write all sorts of things to you,
+ rightly and wrongly perhaps; when wrongly forgive it. I think of you
+ always. May God bless you. 'Love me for ever,' as
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">Your&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right"><i>Ba</i>
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>R.B. to E.B.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">25th Dec. [1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ My dear Christmas gift of a letter! I will write back a few lines,
+ (all I can, having to go out now)&mdash;just that I may forever,&mdash;certainly
+ during our mortal 'forever'&mdash;mix my love for you, and, as you suffer
+ me to say, your love for me ... dearest! ... these shall be mixed with
+ the other loves of the day and live therein&mdash;as I write, and trust,
+ and know&mdash;forever! While I live I will remember what was my feeling in
+ reading, and in writing, and in stopping from either ... as I have
+ just done ... to kiss you and bless you with my whole heart.&mdash;Yes,
+ yes, bless you, my own!
+</p>
+<p>
+ All is right, all of your letter ... admirably right and just in the
+ defence of the women I <i>seemed</i> to speak against; and only
+ seemed&mdash;because that is a way of mine which you must have observed;
+ that foolish concentrating of thought and feeling, for a moment, on
+ some one little spot of a character or anything else indeed, and in
+ the attempt to do justice and develop whatever may seem ordinarily to
+ be overlooked in it,&mdash;that over vehement <i>insisting</i> on, and giving an
+ undue prominence to, the same&mdash;which has the effect of taking away
+ from the importance of the rest of the related objects which, in
+ truth, are not considered at all ... or they would also rise
+ proportionally when subjected to the same (that is, correspondingly
+ magnified and dilated) light and concentrated feeling. So, you
+ remember, the old divine, preaching on 'small sins,' in his zeal to
+ expose the tendencies and consequences usually made little account of,
+ was led to maintain the said small sins to be 'greater than great
+ ones.' <i>But then</i> ... if you look on the world <i>altogether</i>, and
+ accept the small natures, in their usual proportion with the greater
+ ... things do not look <i>quite</i> so bad; because the conduct which <i>is</i>
+ atrocious in those higher cases, of proposal and acceptance, <i>may</i> be
+ no more than the claims of the occasion justify (wait and hear) in
+ certain other cases where the thing sought for and granted is avowedly
+ less by a million degrees. It shall all be traffic, exchange (counting
+ spiritual gifts as only coin, for our purpose), but surely the
+ formalities and policies and decencies all vary with the nature of the
+ thing trafficked for. If a man makes up his mind during half his life
+ to acquire a Pitt-diamond or a Pilgrim-pearl&mdash;[he] gets witnesses and
+ testimony and so forth&mdash;but, surely, when I pass a shop where oranges
+ are ticketed up seven for sixpence I offend no law by sparing all
+ words and putting down the piece with a certain authoritative ring on
+ the counter. If instead of diamonds you want&mdash;(being a king or
+ queen)&mdash;provinces with live men on them ... there is so much more
+ diplomacy required; new interests are appealed to&mdash;high motives
+ <i>supposed</i>, at all events&mdash;whereas, when, in Naples, a man asks leave
+ to black your shoe in the dusty street 'purely for the honour of
+ serving your Excellency' you laugh and would be sorry to find yourself
+ without a 'grano' or two&mdash;(six of which, about, make a farthing)&mdash;Now
+ do you not see! Where so little is to be got, why offer much more? If
+ a man knows that ... but I am teaching you! All I mean is, that, in
+ Benedick's phrase, 'the world must go on.' He who honestly wants his
+ wife to sit at the head of his table and carve ... that is be his
+ <i>help-meat</i> (not 'help mete for him')&mdash;he shall assuredly find a girl
+ of his degree who wants the table to sit at; and some dear friend to
+ mortify, who <i>would</i> be glad of such a piece of fortune; and if that
+ man offers that woman a bunch of orange-flowers and a sonnet, instead
+ of a buck-horn-handled sabre-shaped knife, sheathed in a 'Every Lady
+ Her Own <i>Market-Woman</i>, Being a Table of' &amp;c. &amp;c.&mdash;<i>then</i>, I say he
+ is&mdash;
+</p>
+<p>
+ Bless you, dearest&mdash;the clock strikes&mdash;and time is none&mdash;but&mdash;bless
+ you!
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">Your own R.B.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>R.B. to E.B.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Saturday 4. p.m.<br>
+[Post-mark, December 27, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ I was forced to leave off abruptly on Christmas Morning&mdash;and now I
+ have but a few minutes before our inexorable post leaves. I hoped to
+ return from Town earlier. But I can say something&mdash;and Monday will
+ make amends.
+</p>
+<p>
+ 'For ever' and for ever I <i>do</i> love you, dearest&mdash;love you with my
+ whole heart&mdash;in life, in death&mdash;
+</p>
+<p>
+ Yes; I did go to Mr. Kenyon's&mdash;who had a little to forgive in my slack
+ justice to his good dinner, but was for the rest his own kind
+ self&mdash;and I went, also, to Moxon's&mdash;who said something about my
+ number's going off 'rather heavily'&mdash;so let it!
+</p>
+<p>
+ Too good, too, too indulgent you are, my own Ba, to 'acts' first or
+ last; but all the same, I am glad and encouraged. <i>Let</i> me get done
+ with these, and better things will follow.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Now, bless you, ever, my sweetest&mdash;I have you ever in my thoughts&mdash;And
+ on Monday, remember, I am to see you.
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">Your own R.B.
+</p>
+<p>
+ See what I cut out of a <i>Cambridge Advertiser</i><a href="#note-24"><b>24</b></a> of the 24th&mdash;to make
+ you laugh!
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>E.B.B. to R.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Saturday.<br>
+[Post-mark, December 27, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ Yes, indeed, I have 'observed that way' in you, and not once, and not
+ twice, and not twenty times, but oftener than any,&mdash;and almost every
+ time ... do you know, ... with an uncomfortable feeling from the
+ reflection that <i>that</i> is the way for making all sorts of mistakes
+ dependent on and issuing in exaggeration. It is the very way!&mdash;the
+ highway.
+</p>
+<p>
+ For what you say in the letter here otherwise, I do not deny the
+ truth&mdash;as partial truth:&mdash;I was speaking generally quite. Admit that I
+ am not apt to be extravagant in my <i>esprit de sexe</i>: the Martineau
+ doctrines of intellectual equality &amp;c., I gave them up, you remember,
+ like a woman&mdash;most disgracefully, as Mrs. Jameson would tell me. But
+ we are not on that ground now&mdash;we are on ground worth holding a brief
+ for!&mdash;and when women fail <i>here</i> ... it is not so much our fault.
+ Which was all I meant to say from the beginning.
+</p>
+<p>
+ It reminds me of the exquisite analysis in your 'Luria,' this third
+ act, of the worth of a woman's sympathy,&mdash;indeed of the exquisite
+ double-analysis of unlearned and learned sympathies. Nothing could be
+ better, I think, than this:&mdash;
+</p>
+<blockquote><blockquote><blockquote><blockquote><blockquote><blockquote><p style="text-indent: 0em">To the motive, the endeavour,&mdash;the heart's self&mdash;<br>
+Your quick sense looks; you crown and call aright<br>
+The soul of the purpose ere 'tis shaped as act,<br>
+Takes flesh i' the world, and clothes itself a king;
+</p>
+</blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote>
+<p style="text-indent: 0em">except the characterizing of the 'learned praise,' which comes
+ afterwards in its fine subtle truth. What would these critics do to
+ you, to what degree undo you, who would deprive you of the exercise of
+ the discriminative faculty of the metaphysicians? As if a poet could
+ be great without it! They might as well recommend a watchmaker to deal
+ only in faces, in dials, and not to meddle with the wheels inside!
+ You shall tell Mr. Forster so.
+</p>
+<p>
+ And speaking of 'Luria,' which grows on me the more I read, ... how
+ fine he is when the doubt breaks on him&mdash;I mean, when he begins ...
+ 'Why then, all is very well.' It is most affecting, I think, all that
+ process of doubt ... and that reference to the friends at home (which
+ at once proves him a stranger, and intimates, by just a stroke, that
+ he will not look home for comfort out of the new foreign treason) is
+ managed by you with singular dramatic dexterity....
+</p>
+<blockquote><blockquote><blockquote><blockquote><blockquote><blockquote><p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; ... 'so slight, so slight,<br>
+And yet it tells you they are dead and gone'&mdash;
+</p>
+</blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote>
+<p style="text-indent: 0em">And then, the direct approach....
+</p>
+<blockquote><blockquote><blockquote><blockquote><blockquote><blockquote><p style="text-indent: 0em">You now, so kind here, all you Florentines,<br>
+What is it in your eyes?&mdash;
+</p>
+</blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><p>
+ Do you not feel it to be success, ... '<i>you</i> now?' <i>I</i> do, from my low
+ ground as reader. The whole breaking round him of the cloud, and the
+ manner in which he <i>stands</i>, facing it, ... I admire it all
+ thoroughly. Braccio's vindication of Florence strikes me as almost too
+ <i>poetically</i> subtle for the man&mdash;but nobody could have the heart to
+ wish a line of it away&mdash;<i>that</i> would be too much for critical virtue!
+</p>
+<p>
+ I had your letter yesterday morning early. The post-office people were
+ so resolved on keeping their Christmas, that they would not let me
+ keep mine. No post all day, after that general post before noon, which
+ never brings me anything worth the breaking of a seal!
+</p>
+<p>
+ Am I to see you on Monday? If there should be the least, least
+ crossing of that day, ... anything to do, anything to see, anything to
+ listen to,&mdash;remember how Tuesday stands close by, and that another
+ Monday comes on the following week. Now I need not say <i>that</i> every
+ time, and you will please to remember it&mdash;Eccellenza!&mdash;
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">May God bless you&mdash;</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">Your</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">E.B.B.
+</p>
+<p>
+ From the <i>New Monthly Magazine</i>. 'The admirers of Robert Browning's
+ poetry, and they are now very numerous, will be glad to hear of the
+ issue by Mr. Moxon of a seventh series of the renowned "Bells" and
+ delicious "Pomegranates," under the title of "Dramatic Romances and
+ Lyrics."'
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>E.B.B. to R.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Tuesday.<br>
+[Post-mark, December 30, 1845.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ When you are gone I find your flowers; and you never spoke of nor
+ showed them to me&mdash;so instead of yesterday I thank you to-day&mdash;thank
+ you. Count among the miracles that your flowers live with me&mdash;I accept
+ <i>that</i> for an omen, dear&mdash;dearest! Flowers in general, all other
+ flowers, die of despair when they come into the same atmosphere ...
+ used to do it so constantly and observably that it made me melancholy
+ and I left off for the most part having them here. Now you see how
+ they put up with the close room, and condescend to me and the dust&mdash;it
+ is true and no fancy! To be sure they know that I care for them and
+ that I stand up by the table myself to change their water and cut
+ their stalk freshly at intervals&mdash;<i>that</i> may make a difference
+ perhaps. Only the great reason must be that they are yours, and that
+ you teach them to bear with me patiently.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Do not pretend even to misunderstand what I meant to say yesterday of
+ dear Mr. Kenyon. His blame would fall as my blame of myself has
+ fallen: he would say&mdash;will say&mdash;'it is ungenerous of her to let such a
+ risk be run! I thought she would have been more generous.' There, is
+ Mr. Kenyon's opinion as I foresee it! Not that it would be spoken, you
+ know! he is too kind. And then, he said to me last summer, somewhere
+ <i>à propos</i> to the flies or butterflies, that he had 'long ceased to
+ wonder at any extreme of foolishness produced by&mdash;<i>love</i>.' He will of
+ course think you very very foolish, but not ungenerously foolish like
+ other people.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Never mind. I do not mind indeed. I mean, that, having said to myself
+ worse than the worst perhaps of what can be said against me by any who
+ regard me at all, and feeling it put to silence by the fact that you
+ <i>do</i> feel so and so for me; feeling that fact to be an answer to
+ all,&mdash;I cannot mind much, in comparison, the railing at second remove.
+ There will be a nine days' railing of it and no more: and if on the
+ ninth day you should not exactly wish never to have known me, the
+ better reason will be demonstrated to stand with us. On this one point
+ the wise man cannot judge for the fool his neighbour. If you <i>do</i> love
+ me, the inference is that you would be happier with than without
+ me&mdash;and whether you do, you know better than another: so I think of
+ <i>you</i> and not of <i>them</i>&mdash;always of <i>you</i>! When I talked of being
+ afraid of dear Mr. Kenyon, I just meant that he makes me nervous with
+ his all-scrutinizing spectacles, put on for great occasions, and his
+ questions which seem to belong to the spectacles, they go together
+ so:&mdash;and then I have no presence of mind, as you may see without the
+ spectacles. My only way of hiding (when people set themselves to look
+ for me) would be the old child's way of getting behind the window
+ curtains or under the sofa:&mdash;and even <i>that</i> might not be effectual if
+ I had recourse to it now. Do you think it would? Two or three times I
+ fancied that Mr. Kenyon suspected something&mdash;but if he ever <i>did</i>, his
+ only reproof was a reduplicated praise of <i>you</i>&mdash;he praises you always
+ and in relation to every sort of subject.
+</p>
+<p>
+ What a <i>misomonsism</i> you fell into yesterday, you who have much great
+ work to do which no one else can do except just yourself!&mdash;and you,
+ too, who have courage and knowledge, and must know that every work,
+ with the principle of life in it, <i>will</i> live, let it be trampled ever
+ so under the heel of a faithless and unbelieving generation&mdash;yes, that
+ it will live like one of your toads, for a thousand years in the heart
+ of a rock. All men can teach at second or third hand, as you said ...
+ by prompting the foremost rows ... by tradition and translation:&mdash;all,
+ <i>except</i> poets, who must preach their own doctrine and sing their own
+ song, to be the means of any wisdom or any music, and therefore have
+ stricter duties thrust upon them, and may not lounge in the <span title="stoa">&sigma;&tau;&omicron;&alpha;</span>
+ like the conversation-teachers. So much I have to say to you,
+ till we are in the Siren's island&mdash;and <i>I</i>, jealous of the Siren!&mdash;
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: center">The Siren waits thee singing song for song,
+</p>
+<p style="text-indent: 0em">says Mr. Landor. A prophecy which refuses to class you with the 'mute
+ fishes,' precisely as I do.
+</p>
+<p>
+ And are you not my 'good'&mdash;all my good now&mdash;my only good ever? The
+ Italians would say it better without saying more.
+</p>
+<p>
+ I had a letter from Miss Martineau this morning who accounts for her
+ long silence by the supposition,&mdash;put lately to an end by scarcely
+ credible information from Mr. Moxon, she says&mdash;that I was out of
+ England; gone to the South from the 20th of September. She calls
+ herself the strongest of women, and talks of 'walking fifteen miles
+ one day and writing fifteen pages another day without fatigue,'&mdash;also
+ of mesmerizing and of being infinitely happy except in the continued
+ alienation of two of her family who cannot forgive her for getting
+ well by such unlawful means. And she is to write again to tell me of
+ Wordsworth, and promises to send me her new work in the meanwhile&mdash;all
+ very kind.
+</p>
+<p>
+ So here is my letter to you, which you asked for so 'against the
+ principles of universal justice.' Yes, very unjust&mdash;very unfair it
+ was&mdash;only, you make me do just as you like in everything. Now confess
+ to your own conscience that even if I had not a lawful claim of a debt
+ against you, I might come to ask charity with another sort of claim,
+ oh 'son of humanity.' Think how much more need of a letter <i>I</i> have
+ than you can have; and that if you have a giant's power, ''tis
+ tyrannous to use it like a giant.' Who would take tribute from the
+ desert? How I grumble. <i>Do</i> let me have a letter directly! remember
+ that no other light comes to my windows, and that I wait 'as those who
+ watch for the morning'&mdash;'lux mea!'
+</p>
+<p>
+ May God bless you&mdash;and mind to say how you are <i>exactly</i>, and don't
+ neglect the walking, <i>pray</i> do not.
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">Your own
+</p>
+<p>
+ And after all, those women! A great deal of doctrine commends and
+ discommends itself by the delivery: and an honest thing may be said so
+ foolishly as to disprove its very honesty. Now after all, what did she
+ mean by that very silly expression about books, but that she did not
+ feel as she considered herself capable of feeling&mdash;and that else but
+ <i>that</i> was the meaning of the other woman? Perhaps it should have been
+ spoken earlier&mdash;nay, clearly it should&mdash;but surely it was better
+ spoken even in the last hour than not at all ... surely it is always
+ and under all circumstances, better spoken at whatever cost&mdash;I have
+ thought so steadily since I could think or feel at all. An entire
+ openness to the last moment of possible liberty, at whatever cost and
+ consequence, is the most honourable and most merciful way, both for
+ men and women! perhaps for men in an especial manner. But I shall send
+ this letter away, being in haste to get change for it.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>R.B. to E.B.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Wednesday, December 31, 1845.
+</p>
+<p>
+ I have been properly punished for so much treachery as went to that
+ re-urging the prayer that <i>you</i> would begin writing, when all the time
+ (after the first of those words had been spoken which bade <i>me</i> write)
+ I was full of purpose to send my own note last evening; one which
+ should do its best to thank you: but see, the punishment! At home I
+ found a note from Mr. Horne&mdash;on the point of setting out for Ireland,
+ too unwell to manage to come over to me; anxious, so he said, to see
+ me before leaving London, and with only Tuesday or to-day to allow the
+ opportunity of it, if I should choose to go and find him out. So I
+ considered all things and determined to go&mdash;but not till so late did I
+ determine on Tuesday, that there was barely time to get to
+ Highgate&mdash;wherefore no letter reached you to beg pardon ... and now
+ this undeserved&mdash;beyond the usual undeservedness&mdash;this
+ last-day-of-the-Year's gift&mdash;do you think or not think my gratitude
+ weighs on me? When I lay this with the others, and remember what you
+ have done for me&mdash;I do bless you&mdash;so as I cannot but believe must
+ reach the all-beloved head all my hopes and fancies and cares fly
+ straight to. Dearest, whatever change the new year brings with it, we
+ are together&mdash;I can give you no more of myself&mdash;indeed, you give me
+ now (back again if you choose, but changed and renewed by your
+ possession) the powers that seemed most properly mine. I could only
+ mean that, by the expressions to which you refer&mdash;only could mean that
+ you were my crown and palm branch, now and for ever, and so, that it
+ was a very indifferent matter to me if the world took notice of that
+ fact or no. Yes, dearest, that <i>is</i> the meaning of the prophecy, which
+ I was stupidly blind not to have read and taken comfort from long ago.
+ You ARE the veritable Siren&mdash;and you 'wait me,' and will sing 'song
+ for song.' And this is my first song, my true song&mdash;this love I bear
+ you&mdash;I look into my heart and then let it go forth under that
+ name&mdash;love. I am more than mistrustful of many other feelings in me:
+ they are not earnest enough; so far, not true enough&mdash;but this is all
+ the flower of my life which you call forth and which lies at your
+ feet.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Now let me say it&mdash;what you are to remember. That if I had the
+ slightest doubt, or fear, I would utter it to you on the
+ instant&mdash;secure in the incontested stability of the main <i>fact</i>, even
+ though the heights at the verge in the distance should tremble and
+ prove vapour&mdash;and there would be a deep consolation in your
+ forgiveness&mdash;indeed, yes; but I tell you, on solemn consideration, it
+ does seem to me that&mdash;once take away the broad and general words that
+ admit in their nature of any freight they can be charged with,&mdash;put
+ aside love, and devotion, and trust&mdash;and <i>then</i> I seem to have said
+ <i>nothing</i> of my feeling to you&mdash;nothing whatever.
+</p>
+<p>
+ I will not write more now on this subject. Believe you are my blessing
+ and infinite reward beyond possible desert in intention,&mdash;my life has
+ been crowned by you, as I said!
+</p>
+<p>
+ May God bless you ever&mdash;through you I shall be blessed. May I kiss
+ your cheek and pray this, my own, all-beloved?
+</p>
+<p>
+ I must add a word or two of other things. I am very well now, quite
+ well&mdash;am walking and about to walk. Horne, or rather his friends,
+ reside in the very lane Keats loved so much&mdash;Millfield Lane. Hunt lent
+ me once the little copy of the first Poems dedicated to him&mdash;and on
+ the title-page was recorded in Hunt's delicate characters that 'Keats
+ met him with this, the presentation-copy, or whatever was the odious
+ name, in M&mdash;&mdash; Lane&mdash;called Poets' Lane by the gods&mdash;Keats came
+ running, holding it up in his hand.' Coleridge had an affection for
+ the place, and Shelley '<i>knew</i>' it&mdash;and I can testify it is green and
+ silent, with pleasant openings on the grounds and ponds, through the
+ old trees that line it. But the hills here are far more open and wild
+ and hill-like; not with the eternal clump of evergreens and thatched
+ summer house&mdash;to say nothing of the 'invisible railing' miserably
+ visible everywhere.
+</p>
+<p>
+ You very well know <i>what</i> a vision it is you give me&mdash;when you speak
+ of <i>standing up by the table</i> to care for my flowers&mdash;(which I will
+ never be ashamed of again, by the way&mdash;I will say for the future;
+ 'here are my best'&mdash;in this as in other things.) Now, do you remember,
+ that once I bade you not surprise me out of my good behaviour by
+ standing to meet me unawares, as visions do, some day&mdash;but now&mdash;<i>omne
+ ignotum</i>? No, dearest!
+</p>
+<p>
+ Ought I to say there will be two days more? till Saturday&mdash;and if one
+ word comes, <i>one</i> line&mdash;think! I am wholly yours&mdash;yours, beloved!
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">R.B.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>E.B.B. to R.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">January 1, 1845 [1846].
+</p>
+<p>
+ How good you are&mdash;how best! it is a favourite play of my memory to
+ take up the thought of what you were to me (to my mind gazing!) years
+ ago, as the poet in an abstraction&mdash;then the thoughts of you, a little
+ clearer, in concrete personality, as Mr. Kenyon's friend, who had
+ dined with him on such a day, or met him at dinner on such another,
+ and said some great memorable thing 'on Wednesday last,' and enquired
+ kindly about <i>me</i> perhaps on Thursday,&mdash;till I was proud! and so, the
+ thoughts of you, nearer and nearer (yet still afar!) as the Mr.
+ Browning who meant to do me the honour of writing to me, and who did
+ write; and who asked me once in a letter (does he remember?) 'not to
+ lean out of the window while his foot was on the stair!'&mdash;to take up
+ all those thoughts, and more than those, one after another, and tie
+ them together with all <i>these</i>, which cannot be named so easily&mdash;which
+ cannot be classed in botany and Greek. It is a nosegay of mystical
+ flowers, looking strangely and brightly, and keeping their May-dew
+ through the Christmases&mdash;better than even <i>your</i> flowers! And I am not
+ 'ashamed' of mine, ... be very sure! no!
+</p>
+<p>
+ For the siren, I never suggested to you any such thing&mdash;why you do not
+ pretend to have read such a suggestion in my letter certainly. <i>That</i>
+ would have been most exemplarily modest of me! would it not, O
+ Ulysses?
+</p>
+<p>
+ And you meant to write, ... you <i>meant</i>! and went to walk in 'Poet's
+ lane' instead, (in the 'Aonius of Highgate') which I remember to have
+ read of&mdash;does not Hunt speak of it in his Memoirs?&mdash;and so now there
+ is another track of light in the traditions of the place, and people
+ may talk of the pomegranate-smell between the hedges. So you really
+ have <i>hills</i> at New Cross, and not hills by courtesy? I was at
+ Hampstead once&mdash;and there was something attractive to me in that
+ fragment of heath with its wild smell, thrown down ... like a Sicilian
+ rose from Proserpine's lap when the car drove away, ... into all that
+ arid civilization, 'laurel-clumps and invisible visible fences,' as
+ you say!&mdash;and the grand, eternal smoke rising up in the distance, with
+ its witness against nature! People grew severely in jest about cockney
+ landscape&mdash;but is it not true that the trees and grass in the close
+ neighbourhood of great cities must of necessity excite deeper emotion
+ than the woods and valleys will, a hundred miles off, where human
+ creatures ruminate stupidly as the cows do, the 'county families'
+ es-<i>chewing</i> all men who are not 'landed proprietors,' and the farmers
+ never looking higher than to the fly on the uppermost turnip-leaf! Do
+ you know at all what English country-life is, which the English praise
+ so, and 'moralize upon into a thousand similes,' as that one greatest,
+ purest, noblest thing in the world&mdash;the purely English and excellent
+ thing? It is to my mind simply and purely abominable, and I would
+ rather live in a street than be forced to live it out,&mdash;that English
+ country-life; for I don't mean life in the country. The social
+ exigencies&mdash;why, nothing <i>can</i> be so bad&mdash;nothing! That is the way by
+ which Englishmen grow up to top the world in their peculiar line of
+ respectable absurdities.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Think of my talking so as if I could be vexed with any one of them!
+ <i>I!</i>&mdash;On the contrary I wish them all a happy new year to abuse one
+ another, or visit each of them his nearest neighbour whom he hates,
+ three times a week, because 'the distance is so convenient,' and give
+ great dinners in noble rivalship (venison from the Lord Lieutenant
+ against turbot from London!), and talk popularity and game-law by
+ turns to the tenantry, and beat down tithes to the rector. This
+ glorious England of ours; with its peculiar glory of the rural
+ districts! And <i>my</i> glory of patriotic virtue, who am so happy in
+ spite of it all, and make a pretence of talking&mdash;talking&mdash;while I
+ think the whole time of your letter. I think of your letter&mdash;I am no
+ more a patriot than <i>that</i>!
+</p>
+<p>
+ May God bless you, best and dearest! You say things to me which I am
+ not worthy to listen to for a moment, even if I was deaf dust the next
+ moment.... I confess it humbly and earnestly as before God.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Yet He knows,&mdash;if the entireness of a gift means anything,&mdash;that I
+ have not given with a reserve, that I am yours in my life and soul,
+ for this year and for other years. Let me be used <i>for</i> you rather
+ than <i>against</i> you! and that unspeakable, immeasurable grief of
+ feeling myself a stone in your path, a cloud in your sky, may I be
+ saved from it!&mdash;pray it for <i>me</i> ... for <i>my</i> sake rather than
+ <i>yours</i>. For the rest, I thank you, I thank you. You will be always to
+ me, what to-day you are&mdash;and that is all!&mdash;!
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">I am your own&mdash;
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>R.B. to E.B.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Sunday Night.<br>
+[Post-mark, January 5, 1846.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ Yesterday, nearly the last thing, I bade you 'think of me'&mdash;I wonder
+ if you could misunderstand me in that?&mdash;As if my words or actions or
+ any of my ineffectual outside-self <i>should</i> be thought of, unless to
+ be forgiven! But I do, dearest, feel confident that while I am in your
+ mind&mdash;cared for, rather than thought about&mdash;no great harm can happen
+ to me; and as, for great harm to reach me, it must pass through you,
+ you will care for yourself; <i>my</i>self, best self!
+</p>
+<p>
+ Come, let us talk. I found Horne's book at home, and have had time to
+ see that fresh beautiful things are there&mdash;I suppose 'Delora' will
+ stand alone still&mdash;but I got pleasantly smothered with that odd shower
+ of wood-spoils at the end, the dwarf-story; cup-masses and fern and
+ spotty yellow leaves,&mdash;all that, I love heartily&mdash;and there is good
+ sailor-speech in the 'Ben Capstan'&mdash;though he does knock a man down
+ with a 'crow-bar'&mdash;instead of a marling-spike or, even, a
+ belaying-pin! The first tale, though good, seems least new and
+ individual, but I must know more. At one thing I wonder&mdash;his not
+ reprinting a quaint clever <i>real</i> ballad, published before 'Delora,'
+ on the 'Merry Devil of Edmonton'&mdash;the first of his works I ever read.
+ No, the very first piece was a single stanza, if I remember, in which
+ was this line: 'When bason-crested Quixote, lean and bold,'&mdash;good, is
+ it not? Oh, while it strikes me, good, too, <i>is</i> that 'Swineshead
+ Monk' ballad! Only I miss the old chronicler's touch on the method of
+ concocting the poison: 'Then stole this Monk into the Garden and under
+ a certain herb found out a Toad, which, squeezing into a cup,' &amp;c.
+ something to that effect. I suspect, <i>par parenthèse</i>, you have found
+ out by this time my odd liking for 'vermin'&mdash;you once wrote '<i>your</i>
+ snails'&mdash;and certainly snails are old clients of mine&mdash;but efts! Horne
+ traced a line to me&mdash;in the rhymes of a ''prentice-hand' I used to
+ look over and correct occasionally&mdash;taxed me (last week) with having
+ altered the wise line 'Cold as a <i>lizard</i> in a <i>sunny</i> stream' to
+ 'Cold as a newt hid in a shady brook'&mdash;for 'what do <i>you</i> know about
+ newts?' he asked of the author&mdash;who thereupon confessed. But never try
+ and catch a speckled gray lizard when we are in Italy, love, and you
+ see his tail hang out of the chink of a wall, his
+ winter-house&mdash;because the strange tail will snap off, drop from him
+ and stay in your fingers&mdash;and though you afterwards learn that there
+ is more desperation in it and glorious determination to be free, than
+ positive pain (so people say who have no tails to be twisted off)&mdash;and
+ though, moreover, the tail grows again after a sort&mdash;<i>yet</i> ... don't
+ do it, for it will give you a thrill! What a fine fellow our English
+ water-eft is; 'Triton paludis Linnaei'&mdash;<i>e come guizza</i> (<i>that</i> you
+ can't say in another language; cannot preserve the little in-and-out
+ motion along with the straightforwardness!)&mdash;I always loved all those
+ wild creatures God '<i>sets up for themselves</i>' so independently of us,
+ so successfully, with their strange happy minute inch of a candle, as
+ it were, to light them; while we run about and against each other with
+ our great cressets and fire-pots. I once saw a solitary bee nipping a
+ leaf round till it exactly fitted the front of a hole; his nest, no
+ doubt; or tomb, perhaps&mdash;'Safe as Oedipus's grave-place, 'mid Colone's
+ olives swart'&mdash;(Kiss me, my Siren!)&mdash;Well, it seemed awful to watch
+ that bee&mdash;he seemed so <i>instantly</i> from the teaching of God! Ælian
+ says that ... a <i>frog</i>, does he say?&mdash;some animal, having to swim
+ across the Nile, never fails to provide himself with a bit of reed,
+ which he bites off and holds in his mouth transversely and so puts
+ from shore gallantly ... because when the water-serpent comes swimming
+ to meet him, there is the reed, wider than his serpent's jaws, and no
+ hopes of a swallow that time&mdash;now fancy the two meeting heads, the
+ frog's wide eyes and the vexation of the snake!
+</p>
+<p>
+ Now, see! do I deceive you? Never say I began by letting down my
+ dignity 'that with no middle flight intends to soar above the Aonian
+ Mount'!&mdash;
+</p>
+<p>
+ My best, dear, dear one,&mdash;may you be better, less <i>depressed</i>, ... I
+ can hardly imagine frost reaching you if I could be by you. Think what
+ happiness you mean to give me,&mdash;what a life; what a death! 'I may
+ change'&mdash;too true; yet, you see, as an eft was to me at the beginning
+ so it continues&mdash;I <i>may</i> take up stones and pelt the next I
+ see&mdash;but&mdash;do you much fear that?&mdash;Now, <i>walk</i>, move, <i>guizza, anima
+ mia dolce</i>. Shall I not know one day how far your mouth will be from
+ mine as we walk? May I let that stay ... dearest, (the <i>line</i> stay,
+ not the mouth)?
+</p>
+<p>
+ I am not very well to-day&mdash;or, rather, have not been so&mdash;<i>now</i>, I am
+ well and <i>with you</i>. I just say that, very needlessly, but for strict
+ frankness' sake. Now, you are to write to me soon, and tell me all
+ about your self, and to love me ever, as I love you ever, and bless
+ you, and leave you in the hands of God&mdash;My own love!&mdash;
+</p>
+<p>
+ Tell me if I do wrong to send <i>this</i> by a morning post&mdash;so as to reach
+ you earlier than the evening&mdash;when you will ... write to me?
+</p>
+<p>
+ Don't let me forget to say that I shall receive the <i>Review</i>
+ to-morrow, and will send it directly.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>E.B.B. to R.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Sunday.<br>
+[Post-mark, January 6, 1846.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ When you get Mr. Horne's book you will understand how, after reading
+ just the first and the last poems, I could not help speaking coldly a
+ little of it&mdash;and in fact, estimating his power as much as you can do,
+ I did think and do, that the last was unworthy of him, and that the
+ first might have been written by a writer of one tenth of his faculty.
+ But last night I read the 'Monk of Swineshead Abbey' and the 'Three
+ Knights of Camelott' and 'Bedd Gelert' and found them all of different
+ stuff, better, stronger, more consistent, and read them with pleasure
+ and admiration. Do you remember this application, among the countless
+ ones of shadow to the transiency of life? I give the first two lines
+ for clearness&mdash;
+</p>
+<blockquote><blockquote><blockquote><blockquote><blockquote><blockquote><p style="text-indent: 0em">Like to the cloud upon the hill<br>
+We are a moment seen<br>
+Or the <i>shadow of the windmill-sail<br>
+Across yon sunny slope of green</i>.
+</p>
+</blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote>
+<p style="text-indent: 0em">New or not, and I don't remember it elsewhere, it is just and
+ beautiful I think. Think how the shadow of the windmill-sail just
+ touches the ground on a bright windy day! the shadow of a bird flying
+ is not faster! Then the 'Three Knights' has beautiful things, with
+ more definite and distinct images than he is apt to show&mdash;for his
+ character is a vague grand massiveness,&mdash;like Stonehenge&mdash;or at least,
+ if 'towers and battlements he sees' they are 'bosomed high' in dusky
+ clouds ... it is a 'passion-created imagery' which has no clear
+ outline. In this ballad of the 'Knights,' and in the Monk's too, we
+ may <i>look at</i> things, as on the satyr who swears by his horns and
+ mates not with his kind afterwards, 'While, <i>holding beards</i>, they
+ dance in pairs&mdash;and that is all excellent and reminds one of those
+ fine sylvan festivals, 'in Orion.' But now tell me if you like
+ altogether 'Ben Capstan' and if you consider the sailor-idiom to be
+ lawful in poetry, because I do not indeed. On the same principle we
+ may have Yorkshire and Somersetshire 'sweet Doric'; and do recollect
+ what it ended in of old, in the Blowsibella heroines. Then for the Elf
+ story ... why should such things be written by men like Mr. Horne? I
+ am vexed at it. Shakespeare and Fletcher did not write so about
+ fairies:&mdash;Drayton did not. Look at the exquisite 'Nymphidia,' with its
+ subtle sylvan consistency, and then at the lumbering coarse ...
+ '<i>machina intersit</i>' ... Grandmama Grey!&mdash;to say nothing of the 'small
+ dog' that isn't the 'small boy.' Mr. Horne succeeds better on a larger
+ canvass, and with weightier material; with blank verse rather than
+ lyrics. He cannot make a fine stroke. He wants subtlety and elasticity
+ in the thought and expression. Remember, I admire him honestly and
+ earnestly. No one has admired more than I the 'Death of Marlowe,'
+ scenes in 'Cosmo,' and 'Orion' in much of it. But now tell me if you
+ can accept with the same stretched out hand all these lyrical poems? I
+ am going to write to him as much homage as can come truly. Who
+ combines different faculties as you do, striking the whole octave? No
+ one, at present in the world.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Dearest, after you went away yesterday and I began to consider, I
+ found that there was nothing to be so over-glad about in the matter
+ of the letters, for that, Sunday coming next to Saturday, the best now
+ is only as good as the worst before, and I can't hear from you, until
+ Monday ... Monday! Did you think of <i>that</i>&mdash;you who took the credit of
+ acceding so meekly! I shall not praise you in return at any rate. I
+ shall have to wait ... till what o'clock on Monday, tempted in the
+ meanwhile to fall into controversy against the 'new moons and sabbath
+ days' and the pausing of the post in consequence.
+</p>
+<p>
+ You never guessed perhaps, what I look back to at this moment in the
+ physiology of our intercourse, the curious double feeling I had about
+ you&mdash;you personally, and you as the writer of these letters, and the
+ crisis of the feeling, when I was positively vexed and jealous of
+ myself for not succeeding better in making a unity of the two. I could
+ not! And moreover I could not help but that the writer of the letters
+ seemed nearer to me, long ... long ... and in spite of the postmark,
+ than did the personal visitor who confounded me, and left me
+ constantly under such an impression of its being all dream-work on his
+ side, that I have stamped my feet on this floor with impatience to
+ think of having to wait so many hours before the 'candid' closing
+ letter could come with its confessional of an illusion. 'People say,'
+ I used to think, 'that women <i>always</i> know, and certainly I do not
+ know, and therefore ... therefore.'&mdash;The logic crushed on like
+ Juggernaut's car. But in the letters it was different&mdash;the dear
+ letters took me on the side of my own ideal life where I was able to
+ stand a little upright and look round. I could read such letters for
+ ever and answer them after a fashion ... that, I felt from the
+ beginning. But <i>you</i>&mdash;!
+</p>
+<p>
+ <i>Monday.</i>&mdash;Never too early can the light come. Thank you for my
+ letter! Yet you look askance at me over 'newt and toad,' and praise so
+ the Elf-story that I am ashamed to send you my ill humour on the same
+ head. And you really like <i>that</i>? admire it? Grandmama Grey and the
+ night cap and all? and 'shoetye and blue sky?' and is it really wrong
+ of me to like certainly some touches and images, but not the whole,
+ ... not the poem as a whole? I can take delight in the fantastical,
+ and in the grotesque&mdash;but here there is a want of life and
+ consistency, as it seems to me!&mdash;the elf is no elf and speaks no
+ elf-tongue: it is not the right key to touch, ... this, ... for
+ supernatural music. So I fancy at least&mdash;but I will try the poem again
+ presently. You must be right&mdash;unless it should be your over-goodness
+ opposed to my over-badness&mdash;I will not be sure. Or you wrote perhaps
+ in an accidental mood of most excellent critical smoothness, such as
+ Mr. Forster did his last <i>Examiner</i> in, when he gave the all-hail to
+ Mr. Harness as one of the best dramatists of the age!! Ah no!&mdash;not
+ such as Mr. Forster's. Your soul does not enter into his secret&mdash;There
+ can be nothing in common between you. For him to say such a word&mdash;he
+ who knows&mdash;or ought to know!&mdash;And now let us agree and admire the
+ bowing of the old ministrel over Bedd Gelert's unfilled grave&mdash;
+</p>
+<blockquote><blockquote><blockquote><blockquote><blockquote><blockquote><p style="text-indent: 0em">The <i>long</i> beard <i>fell</i> like <i>snow</i> into the grave<br>
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
+With solemn grace
+</p>
+</blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><p style="text-indent: 0em">A poet, a friend, a generous man Mr. Horne is, even if no laureate for
+ the fairies.
+</p>
+<p>
+ I have this moment a parcel of books via Mr. Moxon&mdash;Miss Martineau's
+ two volumes&mdash;and Mr. Bailey sends his 'Festus,' very kindly, ... and
+ 'Woman in the Nineteenth Century' from America from a Mrs. or a Miss
+ Fuller&mdash;how I hate those 'Women of England,' 'Women and their Mission'
+ and the rest. As if any possible good were to be done by such
+ expositions of rights and wrongs.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Your letter would be worth them all, if <i>you</i> were less <i>you</i>! I mean,
+ just this letter, ... all alive as it is with crawling buzzing
+ wriggling cold-blooded warm-blooded creatures ... as all alive as your
+ own pedant's book in the tree. And do you know, I think I like frogs
+ too&mdash;particularly the very little leaping frogs, which are so
+ high-hearted as to emulate the birds. I remember being scolded by my
+ nurses for taking them up in my hands and letting them leap from one
+ hand to the other. But for the toad!&mdash;why, at the end of the row of
+ narrow beds which we called our gardens when we were children, grew an
+ old thorn, and in the hollow of the root of the thorn, lived a toad, a
+ great ancient toad, whom I, for one, never dared approach too nearly.
+ That he 'wore a jewel in his head' I doubted nothing at all. You must
+ see it glitter if you stooped and looked steadily into the hole. And
+ on days when he came out and sate swelling his black sides, I never
+ looked steadily; I would run a hundred yards round through the shrubs,
+ deeper than knee-deep in the long wet grass and nettles, rather than
+ go past him where he sate; being steadily of opinion, in the
+ profundity of my natural history-learning, that if he took it into his
+ toad's head to spit at me I should drop down dead in a moment,
+ poisoned as by one of the Medici.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Oh&mdash;and I had a field-mouse for a pet once, and should have joined my
+ sisters in a rat's nest if I had not been ill at the time (as it was,
+ the little rats were tenderly smothered by over-love!): and
+ blue-bottle flies I used to feed, and hated your spiders for them; yet
+ no, not much. My aversion proper ... call it horror rather ... was for
+ the silent, cold, clinging, gliding <i>bat</i>; and even now, I think, I
+ could not sleep in the room with that strange bird-mouse-creature, as
+ it glides round the ceiling silently, silently as its shadow does on
+ the floor. If you listen or look, there is not a wave of the wing&mdash;the
+ wing never waves! A bird without a feather! a beast that flies! and so
+ cold! as cold as a fish! It is the most supernatural-seeming of
+ natural things. And then to see how when the windows are open at night
+ those bats come sailing ... without a sound&mdash;and go ... you cannot
+ guess where!&mdash;fade with the night-blackness!
+</p>
+<p>
+ You have not been well&mdash;which is my first thought if not my first
+ word. Do walk, and do not work; and think ... what I could be thinking
+ of, if I did not think of <i>you</i> ... dear&mdash;dearest! 'As the doves fly
+ to the windows,' so I think of you! As the prisoners think of liberty,
+ as the dying think of Heaven, so I think of you. When I look up
+ straight to God ... nothing, no one, used to intercept me&mdash;now there
+ is <i>you</i>&mdash;only you under him! Do not use such words as those therefore
+ any more, nor say that you are not to be thought of so and so. You are
+ to be thought of every way. You must know what you are to me if you
+ know at all what <i>I</i> am,&mdash;and what I should be but for you.
+</p>
+<p>
+ So ... love me a little, with the spiders and the toads and the
+ lizards! love me as you love the efts&mdash;and I will believe in <i>you</i> as
+ you believe ... in Ælian&mdash;Will <i>that</i> do?
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">Your own&mdash;
+</p>
+<p>
+ Say how you are when you write&mdash;<i>and write</i>.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>R.B. to E.B.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Tuesday Morning.
+</p>
+<p>
+ I this minute receive the Review&mdash;a poor business, truly! Is there a
+ reason for a man's wits dwindling the moment he gets into a critical
+ High-place to hold forth?&mdash;I have only glanced over the article
+ however. Well, one day <i>I</i> am to write of you, dearest, and it must
+ come to something rather better than <i>that</i>!
+</p>
+<p>
+ I am forced to send now what is to be sent at all. Bless you, dearest.
+ I am trusting to hear from you&mdash;
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">Your R.B.
+</p>
+<p>
+ And I find by a note from a fairer friend and favourer of mine that in
+ the <i>New Quarterly</i> 'Mr. Browning' figures pleasantly as 'one without
+ any sympathy for a human being!'&mdash;Then, for newts and efts at all
+ events!
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>R.B. to E.B.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Tuesday Night.<br>
+[Post-mark, January 7, 1846.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ But, my sweet, there is safer going in letters than in visits, do you
+ not see? In the letter, one may go to the utmost limit of one's
+ supposed tether without danger&mdash;there is the distance so palpably
+ between the most audacious step <i>there</i>, and the next ... which is
+ nowhere, seeing it is not in the letter. Quite otherwise in personal
+ intercourse, where any indication of turning to a certain path, even,
+ might possibly be checked not for its own fault but lest, the path
+ once reached and proceeded in, some other forbidden turning might come
+ into sight, we will say. In the letter, all ended <i>there</i>, just there
+ ... and you may think of that, and forgive; at all events, may avoid
+ speaking irrevocable words&mdash;and when, as to me, those words are
+ intensely <i>true, doom-words</i>&mdash;think, dearest! Because, as I told you
+ once, what most characterizes my feeling for you is the perfect
+ <i>respect</i> in it, the full <i>belief</i> ... (I shall get presently to poor
+ Robert's very avowal of 'owing you all esteem'!). It is on that I
+ build, and am secure&mdash;for how should I know, of myself, how to serve
+ you and be properly yours if it all was to be learnt by my own
+ interpreting, and what you professed to dislike you were to be
+ considered as wishing for, and what liking, as it seemed, you were
+ loathing at your heart, and if so many 'noes' made a 'yes,' and 'one
+ refusal no rebuff' and all that horrible bestiality which stout
+ gentlemen turn up the whites of their eyes to, when they rise after
+ dinner and pressing the right hand to the left side say, 'The toast be
+ dear woman!' Now, love, with this feeling in me from the beginning,&mdash;I
+ do believe,&mdash;<i>now</i>, when I am utterly blest in this gift of your love,
+ and least able to imagine what I should do without it,&mdash;I cannot but
+ believe, I say, that had you given me once a 'refusal'&mdash;clearly
+ derived from your own feelings, and quite apart from any fancied
+ consideration for my interests; had this come upon me, whether slowly
+ but inevitably in the course of events, or suddenly as precipitated by
+ any step of mine; I should, <i>believing you</i>, have never again renewed
+ directly or indirectly such solicitation; I should have begun to count
+ how many other ways were yet open to serve you and devote myself to
+ you ... but from <i>the outside</i>, now, and not in your livery! Now, if I
+ should have acted thus under <i>any</i> circumstances, how could I but
+ redouble my endeavours at precaution after my own foolish&mdash;you know,
+ and forgave long since, and I, too, am forgiven in my own eyes, for
+ the cause, though not the manner&mdash;but could I do other than keep
+ 'farther from you' than in the letters, dearest? For your own part in
+ that matter, seeing it with all the light you have since given me (and
+ <i>then</i>, not inadequately by my own light) I could, I do kiss your
+ feet, kiss every letter in your name, bless you with my whole heart
+ and soul if I could pour them out, from me, before you, to stay and be
+ yours; when I think on your motives and pure perfect generosity. It
+ was the plainness of <i>that</i> which determined me to wait and be patient
+ and grateful and your own for ever in any shape or capacity you might
+ please to accept. Do you think that because I am so rich now, I could
+ not have been most rich, too, <i>then</i>&mdash;in what would seem little only
+ to <i>me</i>, only with this great happiness? I should have been proud
+ beyond measure&mdash;happy past all desert, to call and be allowed to see
+ you simply, speak with you and be spoken to&mdash;what am I more than
+ others? Don't think this mock humility&mdash;<i>it is not</i>&mdash;you take me in
+ your mantle, and we shine together, but I know my part in it! All this
+ is written breathlessly on a sudden fancy that you <i>might</i>&mdash;if not
+ now, at some future time&mdash;give other than this, the true reason, for
+ that discrepancy you see, that nearness in the letters, that early
+ farness in the visits! And, love, all love is but a passionate
+ <i>drawing closer</i>&mdash;I would be one with you, dearest; let my soul press
+ close to you, as my lips, dear life of my life.
+</p>
+<p>
+ <i>Wednesday.</i>&mdash;You are entirely right about those poems of Horne's&mdash;I
+ spoke only of the effect of the first glance, and it is a principle
+ with me to begin by welcoming any strangeness, intention of
+ originality in men&mdash;the other way of safe copying precedents being
+ <i>so</i> safe! So I began by praising all that was at all questionable in
+ the form ... reserving the ground-work for after consideration. The
+ Elf-story turns out a pure mistake, I think&mdash;and a common mistake,
+ too. Fairy stories, the good ones, were written for men and women,
+ and, being true, pleased also children; now, people set about writing
+ for children and miss them and the others too,&mdash;with that detestable
+ irreverence and plain mocking all the time at the very wonder they
+ profess to want to excite. All obvious bending down to the lower
+ capacity, determining not to be the great complete man one is, by
+ half; any patronizing minute to be spent in the nursery over the books
+ and work and healthful play, of a visitor who will presently bid
+ good-bye and betake himself to the Beefsteak Club&mdash;keep us from all
+ that! The Sailor Language is good in its way; but as wrongly used in
+ Art as real clay and mud would be, if one plastered them in the
+ foreground of a landscape in order to attain to so much truth, at all
+ events&mdash;the true thing to endeavour is the making a golden colour
+ which shall do every good in the power of the dirty brown. Well, then,
+ what a veering weathercock am I, to write so and now, <i>so</i>! Not
+ altogether,&mdash;for first it was but the stranger's welcome I gave, the
+ right of every new comer who must stand or fall by his behaviour once
+ admitted within the door. And then&mdash;when I know what Horne thinks
+ of&mdash;you, dearest; how he knew you first, and from the soul admired
+ you; and how little he thinks of my good fortune ... I <i>could</i> <SPAN class="sc-ex">not</span>
+ begin by giving you a bad impression of anything he sends&mdash;he has such
+ very few rewards for a great deal of hard excellent enduring work, and
+ <i>none</i>, no reward, I do think, would he less willingly forego than
+ your praise and sympathy. But your opinion once expressed&mdash;truth
+ remains the truth&mdash;so, at least, I excuse myself ... and quite as much
+ for what I say <i>now</i> as for what was said <i>then</i>! 'King John' is very
+ fine and full of purpose; 'The Noble Heart,' sadly faint and
+ uncharacteristic. The chief incident, too, turns on that poor
+ conventional fallacy about what constitutes a proper wrong to
+ resist&mdash;a piece of morality, after a different standard, is introduced
+ to complete another fashioned morality&mdash;a segment of a circle of
+ larger dimensions is fitted into a smaller one. Now, you may have your
+ own standard of morality in this matter of resistance to wrong, how
+ and when if at all. And you may quite understand and sympathize with
+ quite different standards innumerable of other people; but go from one
+ to the other abruptly, you cannot, I think. 'Bear patiently all
+ injuries&mdash;revenge in no case'&mdash;that is plain. 'Take what you conceive
+ to be God's part, do his evident work, stand up for good and destroy
+ evil, and co-operate with this whole scheme here'&mdash;<i>that</i> is plain,
+ too,&mdash;but, call Otto's act <i>no</i> wrong, or being one, not such as
+ should be avenged&mdash;and then, call the remark of a stranger that one is
+ a 'recreant'&mdash;just what needs the slight punishment of instant death
+ to the remarker&mdash;and ... where is the way? What <i>is</i> clear?
+</p>
+<p>
+ &mdash;Not my letter! which goes on and on&mdash;'dear letters'&mdash;sweetest?
+ because they cost all the precious labour of making out? Well, I shall
+ see you to-morrow, I trust. Bless you, my own&mdash;I have not half said
+ what was to say even in the letter I thought to write, and which
+ proves only what you see! But at a thought I fly off with you, 'at a
+ cock-crow from the Grange.'&mdash;Ever your own.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Last night, I received a copy of the <i>New Quarterly</i>&mdash;now here is
+ popular praise, a sprig of it! Instead of the attack I supposed it to
+ be, from my foolish friend's account, the notice is outrageously
+ eulogistical, a stupidly extravagant laudation from first to last&mdash;and
+ in <i>three other</i> articles, as my sister finds by diligent fishing,
+ they introduce my name with the same felicitous praise (except one
+ instance, though, in a good article by Chorley I am certain); and
+ <i>with</i> me I don't know how many poetical <i>crétins</i> are praised as
+ noticeably&mdash;and, in the turning of a page, somebody is abused in the
+ richest style of scavengering&mdash;only Carlyle! And I love him enough not
+ to envy him nor wish to change places, and giving him mine, mount into
+ his.
+</p>
+<p>
+ All which, let me forget in the thoughts of to-morrow! Bless you, my
+ Ba.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>E.B.B. to R.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Wednesday.<br>
+[Post-mark, January 7, 1846.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ But some things are indeed said very truly, and as I like to read
+ them&mdash;of <i>you</i>, I mean of course,&mdash;though I quite understand that it
+ is doing no manner of good to go back so to 'Paracelsus,' heading the
+ article 'Paracelsus and other poems,' as if the other poems could not
+ front the reader broadly by a divine right of their own. 'Paracelsus'
+ is a great work and will <i>live</i>, but the way to do you good with the
+ stiffnecked public (such good as critics can do in their degree) would
+ have been to hold fast and conspicuously the gilded horn of the last
+ living crowned creature led by you to the altar, saying 'Look <i>here</i>.'
+ What had he to do else, as a critic? Was he writing for the
+ <i>Retrospective Review</i>? And then, no attempt at analytical
+ criticism&mdash;or a failure, at the least attempt! all slack and in
+ sentences! Still these are right things to say, true things, worthy
+ things, said of you as a poet, though your poems do not find justice:
+ and I like, for my own part, the issuing from my cathedral into your
+ great world&mdash;the outermost temple of divinest consecration. I like
+ that figure and association, and none the worse for its being a
+ sufficient refutation of what he dared to impute, of your poetical
+ sectarianism, in another place&mdash;<i>yours</i>!
+</p>
+<p>
+ For me, it is all quite kind enough&mdash;only I object, on my own part
+ also, to being reviewed in the 'Seraphim,' when my better books are
+ nearer: and also it always makes me a little savage when people talk
+ of Tennysonianisms! I have faults enough as the Muses know,&mdash;but let
+ them be <i>my</i> faults! When I wrote the 'Romaunt of Margret,' I had not
+ read a line of Tennyson. I came from the country with my eyes only
+ half open, and he had not penetrated where I had been living and
+ sleeping: and in fact when I afterwards tried to reach him here in
+ London, nothing could be found except one slim volume, so that, till
+ the collected works appeared ... <i>favente</i> Moxon, ... I was ignorant
+ of his best <i>early</i> productions; and not even for the rhythmetical
+ form of my 'Vision of the Poets,' was I indebted to the 'Two
+ Voices,'&mdash;three pages of my 'Vision' having been written several years
+ ago&mdash;at the beginning of my illness&mdash;and thrown aside, and taken up
+ again in the spring of 1844. Ah, well! there's no use talking! In a
+ solitary review which noticed my 'Essay on Mind,' somebody wrote ...
+ 'this young lady imitates Darwin'&mdash;and I never could <i>read</i> Darwin,
+ ... was stopped always on the second page of the 'Loves of the Plants'
+ when I tried to read him to 'justify myself in having an opinion'&mdash;the
+ repulsion was too strong. Yet the 'young lady imitated Darwin' of
+ course, as the infallible critic said so.
+</p>
+<p>
+ And who are Mr. Helps and Miss Emma Fisher and the 'many others,'
+ whose company brings one down to the right plebeianism? The 'three
+ poets in three distant ages born' may well stare amazed!
+</p>
+<p>
+ After all you shall not by any means say that I upset the inkstand on
+ your review in a passion&mdash;because pray mark that the ink has over-run
+ some of your praises, and that if I had been angry to the overthrow of
+ an inkstand, it would not have been precisely <i>there</i>. It is the
+ second book spoilt by me within these two days&mdash;and my fingers were so
+ dabbled in blackness yesterday that to wring my hands would only have
+ made matters worse. Holding them up to Mr. Kenyon they looked dirty
+ enough to befit a poetess&mdash;as black 'as bard beseemed'&mdash;and he took
+ the review away with him to read and save it from more harm.
+</p>
+<p>
+ How could it be that you did not get my letter which would have
+ reached you, I thought, on Monday evening, or on Tuesday at the very
+ very earliest?&mdash;and how is it that I did not hear from you last night
+ again when I was unreasonable enough to expect it? is it true that you
+ <i>hate</i> writing to me?
+</p>
+<p>
+ At that word, comes the review back from dear Mr. Kenyon, and the
+ letter which I enclose to show you how it accounts reasonably for the
+ ink&mdash;I did it 'in a pet,' he thinks! And I ought to buy you a new
+ book&mdash;certainly I ought&mdash;only it is not worth doing justice for&mdash;and I
+ shall therefore send it back to you spoilt as it is; and you must
+ forgive me as magnanimously as you can.
+</p>
+<p>
+ 'Omne ignotum pro magnifico'&mdash;do you think <i>so</i>? I hope not indeed!
+ <i>vo quietando</i>&mdash;and everything else that I ought to do&mdash;except of
+ course, <i>that</i> thinking of you which is so difficult.
+</p>
+<p>
+ May God bless you. Till to-morrow!
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">Your own always.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Mr. Kenyon refers to 'Festus'&mdash;of which I had said that the fine
+ things were worth looking for, in the design manqué.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>E.B.B. to R.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Friday Morning.<br>
+[Post-mark, January 9, 1846.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ You never think, ever dearest, that I 'repent'&mdash;why what a word to
+ use! You never could <i>think</i> such a word for a moment! If you were to
+ leave me even,&mdash;to decide that it is best for you to do it, and do
+ it,&mdash;I should accede at once of course, but never should I nor could I
+ 'repent' ... regret anything ... be sorry for having known you and
+ loved you ... no! Which I say simply to prove that, in <i>no</i> extreme
+ case, could I repent for my own sake. For yours, it might be
+ different.
+</p>
+<p>
+ <i>Not</i> out of 'generosity' certainly, but from the veriest selfishness,
+ I choose here, before God, any possible present evil, rather than the
+ future consciousness of feeling myself less to you, on the whole, than
+ another woman might have been.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Oh, these vain and most heathenish repetitions&mdash;do I not vex you by
+ them, <i>you</i> whom I would always please, and never vex? Yet they force
+ their way because you are the best noblest and dearest in the world,
+ and because your happiness is so precious a thing.
+</p>
+<blockquote><blockquote><blockquote><blockquote><blockquote><blockquote><p style="text-indent: 0em">Cloth of frieze, be not too bold,<br>
+Though thou'rt matched with cloth of gold!
+</p>
+</blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote>
+<p style="text-indent: 0em">&mdash;<i>that</i>, beloved, was written for <i>me</i>. And you, if you would make me
+ happy, <i>always</i> will look at yourself from my ground and by my light,
+ as I see you, and consent to be selfish in all things. Observe, that
+ if I were <i>vacillating</i>, I should not be so weak as to tease you with
+ the process of the vacillation: I should wait till my pendulum ceased
+ swinging. It is precisely because I am your own, past any retraction
+ or wish of retraction,&mdash;because I belong to you by gift and ownership,
+ and am ready and willing to prove it before the world at a word of
+ yours,&mdash;it is precisely for this, that I remind you too often of the
+ necessity of using this right of yours, not to your injury, of being
+ wise and strong for both of us, and of guarding your happiness which
+ is mine. I have said these things ninety and nine times over, and over
+ and over have you replied to them,&mdash;as yesterday!&mdash;and now, do not
+ speak any more. It is only my preachment for general use, and not for
+ particular application,&mdash;only to be <i>ready</i> for application. I love
+ you from the deepest of my nature&mdash;the whole world is nothing to me
+ beside you&mdash;and what is so precious, is not far from being terrible.
+ 'How <i>dreadful</i> is this place.'
+</p>
+<p>
+ To hear you talk yesterday, is a gladness in the thought for
+ to-day,&mdash;it was with such a full assent that I listened to every word.
+ It is true, I think, that we see things (things apart from ourselves)
+ under the same aspect and colour&mdash;and it is certainly true that I have
+ a sort of instinct by which I seem to know your views of such subjects
+ as we have never looked at together. I know <i>you</i> so well (yes, I
+ boast to myself of that intimate knowledge), that I seem to know also
+ the <i>idola</i> of all things as they are in your eyes&mdash;so that never,
+ scarcely, I am curious,&mdash;never anxious, to learn what your opinions
+ may be. Now, <i>have</i> I been curious or anxious? It was enough for me to
+ know <i>you</i>.
+</p>
+<p>
+ More than enough! You have 'left undone'&mdash;do you say? On the contrary,
+ you have done too much,&mdash;you <i>are</i> too much. My cup,&mdash;which used to
+ hold at the bottom of it just the drop of Heaven dew mingling with the
+ absinthus,&mdash;has overflowed all this wine: and <i>that</i> makes me look out
+ for the vases, which would have held it better, had you stretched out
+ your hand for them.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Say how you are&mdash;and do take care and exercise&mdash;and write to me,
+ dearest!
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">Ever your own&mdash;</p>
+<p style="text-align: right"><SPAN class="sc-ex">Ba</span>.
+</p>
+<p>
+ How right you are about 'Ben Capstan,'&mdash;and the illustration by the
+ <i>yellow clay</i>. That is precisely what I meant,&mdash;said with more
+ precision than I could say it. Art without an ideal is neither nature
+ nor art. The question involves the whole difference between Madame
+ Tussaud and Phidias.
+</p>
+<p>
+ I have just received Mr. Edgar Poe's book&mdash;and I see that the
+ deteriorating preface which was to have saved me from the vanity-fever
+ produceable by the dedication, is cut down and away&mdash;perhaps in this
+ particular copy only!
+</p>
+<p>
+ Tuesday is so near, as men count, that I caught myself just now being
+ afraid lest the week should have no chance of appearing long to you!
+ Try to let it be long to you&mdash;will you? My consistency is wonderful.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>R.B. to E.B.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Friday Morning.
+</p>
+<p>
+ As if I could deny you anything! Here is the Review&mdash;indeed it was
+ foolish to mind your seeing it at all. But now, may I stipulate?&mdash;You
+ shall not send it back&mdash;but on your table I shall find and take it
+ next Tuesday&mdash;<i>c'est convenu</i>! The other precious volume has not yet
+ come to hand (nor to foot) all through your being so sure that to
+ carry it home would have been the death of me last evening!
+</p>
+<p>
+ I cannot write my feelings in this large writing, begun on such a
+ scale for the Review's sake; and just now&mdash;there is no denying it, and
+ spite of all I have been incredulous about&mdash;it does seem that the fact
+ <i>is</i> achieved and that I <i>do</i> love you, plainly, surely, more than
+ ever, more than any day in my life before. It is your secret, the why,
+ the how; the experience is mine. What are you doing to me?&mdash;in the
+ heart's heart.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Rest&mdash;dearest&mdash;bless you&mdash;
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>E.B.B. to R.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Saturday.<br>
+[Post-mark, January 10, 1846.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ Kindest and dearest you are!&mdash;that is 'my secret' and for the others,
+ I leave them to you!&mdash;only it is no secret that I should and must be
+ glad to have the words you sent with the book,&mdash;which I should have
+ seen at all events be sure, whether you had sent it or not. Should I
+ not, do you think? And considering what the present generation of
+ critics really is, the remarks on you may stand, although it is the
+ dreariest impotency to complain of the want of flesh and blood and of
+ human sympathy in general. Yet suffer them to say on&mdash;it is the stamp
+ on the critical knife. There must be something eminently stupid, or
+ farewell criticdom! And if anything more utterly untrue could be said
+ than another, it is precisely that saying, which Mr. Mackay stands up
+ to catch the reversion of! Do you indeed suppose that Heraud could
+ have done this? I scarcely can believe it, though some things are said
+ rightly as about the 'intellectuality,' and how you stand first by the
+ brain,&mdash;which is as true as truth can be. Then, I <i>shall have
+ 'Pauline' in a day or two</i>&mdash;yes, I shall and must, and <i>will</i>.
+</p>
+<p>
+ The 'Ballad Poems and Fancies,' the article calling itself by that
+ name, seems indeed to be Mr. Chorley's, and is one of his very best
+ papers, I think. There is to me a want of colour and thinness about
+ his writings in general, with a grace and <i>savoir faire</i> nevertheless,
+ and always a rightness and purity of intention. Observe what he says
+ of 'many-sidedness' seeming to trench on opinion and principle. That,
+ he means for himself I know, for he has said to me that through having
+ such largeness of sympathy he has been charged with want of
+ principle&mdash;yet 'many-sidedness' is certainly no word for him. The
+ effect of general sympathies may be evolved both from an elastic fancy
+ and from breadth of mind, and it seems to me that he rather <i>bends</i> to
+ a phase of humanity and literature than contains it&mdash;than comprehends
+ it. Every part of a truth implies the whole; and to accept truth all
+ round, does not mean the recognition of contradictory things:
+ universal sympathies cannot make a man inconsistent, but, on the
+ contrary, sublimely consistent. A church tower may stand between the
+ mountains and the sea, looking to either, and stand fast: but the
+ willow-tree at the gable-end, blown now toward the north and now
+ toward the south while its natural leaning is due east or west, is
+ different altogether ... <i>as</i> different as a willow-tree from a church
+ tower.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Ah, what nonsense! There is only one truth for me all this time, while
+ I talk about truth and truth. And do you know, when you have told me
+ to think of you, I have been feeling ashamed of thinking of you so
+ much, of thinking of only you&mdash;which <i>is</i> too much, perhaps. Shall I
+ tell you? it seems to me, to myself, that no man was ever before to
+ any woman what you are to me&mdash;the fulness must be in proportion, you
+ know, to the vacancy ... and only <i>I</i> know what was behind&mdash;the long
+ wilderness <i>without</i> the blossoming rose ... and the capacity for
+ happiness, like a black gaping hole, before this silver flooding. Is
+ it wonderful that I should stand as in a dream, and disbelieve&mdash;not
+ <i>you</i>&mdash;but my own fate? Was ever any one taken suddenly from a
+ lampless dungeon and placed upon the pinnacle of a mountain, without
+ the head turning round and the heart turning faint, as mine do? And
+ you love me <i>more</i>, you say?&mdash;Shall I thank you or God?
+ Both,&mdash;indeed&mdash;and there is no possible return from me to either of
+ you! I thank you as the unworthy may ... and as we all thank God. How
+ shall I ever prove what my heart is to you? How will you ever see it
+ as I feel it? I ask myself in vain.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Have so much faith in me, my only beloved, as to use me simply for
+ your own advantage and happiness, and to your own ends without a
+ thought of any others&mdash;<i>that</i> is all I could ask you with any disquiet
+ as to the granting of it&mdash;May God bless you!&mdash;
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">Your</p>
+<p style="text-align: right"><SPAN class="sc-ex">Ba</span>.
+</p>
+<p>
+ But you have the review <i>now</i>&mdash;surely?
+</p>
+<p>
+ The <i>Morning Chronicle</i> attributes the authorship of 'Modern Poets'
+ (<i>our</i> article) to Lord John Manners&mdash;so I hear this morning. I have
+ not yet looked at the paper myself. The <i>Athenæum</i>, still abominably
+ dumb!&mdash;
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>R.B. to E.B.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Saturday.<br>
+[Post-mark, January 10, 1846.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ This is <i>no</i> letter&mdash;love,&mdash;I make haste to tell you&mdash;to-morrow I will
+ write. For here has a friend been calling and consuming my very
+ destined time, and every minute seemed the last that was to be; and an
+ old, old friend he is, beside&mdash;so&mdash;you must understand my defection,
+ when only this scrap reaches you to-night! Ah, love,&mdash;you are my
+ unutterable blessing,&mdash;I discover you, more of you, day by day,&mdash;hour
+ by hour, I do think!&mdash;I am entirely yours,&mdash;one gratitude, all my soul
+ becomes when I see you over me as now&mdash;God bless my dear, dearest.
+</p>
+<p>
+ My 'Act Fourth' is done&mdash;but too roughly this time! I will tell you&mdash;
+</p>
+<p>
+ One kiss more, dearest!
+</p>
+<p>
+ Thanks for the Review.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>R.B. to E.B.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Sunday.<br>
+[Post-mark, January 12, 1846.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ I have no words for you, my dearest,&mdash;I shall never have.
+</p>
+<p>
+ You are mine, I am yours. Now, here is one sign of what I said ...
+ that I must love you more than at first ... a little sign, and to be
+ looked narrowly for or it escapes me, but then the increase it shows
+ <i>can</i> only be little, so very little now&mdash;and as the fine French
+ Chemical Analysts bring themselves to appreciate matter in its refined
+ stages by <i>millionths</i>, so&mdash;! At first I only thought of being <i>happy</i>
+ in you,&mdash;in your happiness: now I most think of you in the dark hours
+ that must come&mdash;I shall grow old with you, and die with you&mdash;as far as
+ I can look into the night I see the light with me. And surely with
+ that provision of comfort one should turn with fresh joy and renewed
+ sense of security to the sunny middle of the day. I am in the full
+ sunshine now; and <i>after</i>, all seems cared for,&mdash;is it too homely an
+ illustration if I say the day's visit is not crossed by uncertainties
+ as to the return through the wild country at nightfall?&mdash;Now Keats
+ speaks of 'Beauty, that must <i>die</i>&mdash;and Joy whose hand is ever at his
+ lips, bidding farewell!' And <i>who</i> spoke of&mdash;looking up into the eyes
+ and asking 'And <i>how long</i> will you love us'?&mdash;There is a Beauty that
+ will not die, a Joy that bids no farewell, dear dearest eyes that will
+ love for ever!
+</p>
+<p>
+ And <i>I</i>&mdash;am to love no longer than I can. Well, dear&mdash;and when I <i>can</i>
+ no longer&mdash;you will not blame me? You will do only as ever, kindly and
+ justly; hardly more. I do not pretend to say I have chosen to put my
+ fancy to such an experiment, and consider how <i>that</i> is to happen, and
+ what measures ought to be taken in the emergency&mdash;because in the
+ 'universality of my sympathies' I certainly number a very lively one
+ with my own heart and soul, and cannot amuse myself by such a
+ spectacle as their supposed extinction or paralysis. There is no doubt
+ I should be an object for the deepest commiseration of you or any more
+ fortunate human being. And I hope that because such a calamity does
+ not obtrude itself on me as a thing to be prayed against, it is no
+ less duly implied with all the other visitations from which no
+ humanity can be altogether exempt&mdash;just as God bids us ask for the
+ continuance of the 'daily bread'!&mdash;'battle, murder and sudden death'
+ lie behind doubtless. I repeat, and perhaps in so doing only give one
+ more example of the instantaneous conversion of that indignation we
+ bestow in another's case, into wonderful lenity when it becomes our
+ own, ... that I only contemplate the <i>possibility</i> you make me
+ recognize, with pity, and fear ... no anger at all; and imprecations
+ of vengeance, <i>for what</i>? Observe, I only speak of cases <i>possible</i>;
+ of sudden impotency of mind; that <i>is</i> possible&mdash;there <i>are</i> other
+ ways of '<i>changing</i>,' 'ceasing to love' &amp;c. which it is safest not to
+ think of nor believe in. A man <i>may</i> never leave his writing desk
+ without seeing safe in one corner of it the folded slip which directs
+ the disposal of his papers in the event of his reason suddenly leaving
+ him&mdash;or he may never go out into the street without a card in his
+ pocket to signify his address to those who may have to pick him up in
+ an apoplectic fit&mdash;but if he once begins to fear he is growing a glass
+ bottle, and, <i>so</i>, liable to be smashed,&mdash;do you see? And now, love,
+ dear heart of my heart, my own, only Ba&mdash;see no more&mdash;see what I <i>am</i>,
+ what God in his constant mercy ordinarily grants to those who have, as
+ I, received already so much; much, past expression! It is but&mdash;if you
+ will so please&mdash;at worst, forestalling the one or two years, for my
+ sake; but you <i>will</i> be as sure of me <i>one</i> day as I can be now of
+ myself&mdash;and why not <i>now</i> be sure? See, love&mdash;a year is gone by&mdash;we
+ were in one relation when you wrote at the end of a letter 'Do not say
+ I do not tire you' (by writing)&mdash;'<i>I am sure I do</i>.' A year has gone
+ by&mdash;<i>Did you tire me then?</i> <i>Now</i>, you tell me what is told; for my
+ sake, sweet, let the few years go by; we are married, and my arms are
+ round you, and my face touches yours, and I am asking you, '<i>Were you
+ not</i> to me, in that dim beginning of 1846, a joy behind all joys, a
+ life added to and transforming mine, the good I choose from all the
+ possible gifts of God on this earth, for which I seemed to have lived;
+ which accepting, I thankfully step aside and let the rest get what
+ they can; what, it is very likely, they esteem more&mdash;for why should my
+ eye be evil because God's is good; why should I grudge that, giving
+ them, I do believe, infinitely less, he gives them a content in the
+ inferior good and belief in its worth? I should have wished <i>that</i>
+ further concession, that illusion as I believe it, for their
+ sakes&mdash;but I cannot undervalue my own treasure and so scant the only
+ tribute of mere gratitude which is in my power to pay. Hear this said
+ <i>now before</i> the few years; and believe in it <i>now for then</i>, dearest!
+</p>
+<p>
+ Must you see 'Pauline'? At least then let me wait a few days; to
+ correct the misprints which affect the sense, and to write you the
+ history of it; what is necessary you should know before you see it.
+ That article I suppose to be by Heraud&mdash;about two thirds&mdash;and the
+ rest, or a little less, by that Mr. Powell&mdash;whose unimaginable,
+ impudent vulgar stupidity you get some inkling of in the 'Story from
+ Boccaccio'&mdash;of which the <i>words</i> quoted were <i>his</i>, I am sure&mdash;as sure
+ as that he knows not whether Boccaccio lived before or after
+ Shakspeare, whether Florence or Rome be the more northern city,&mdash;one
+ word of Italian in general, or letter of Boccaccio's in particular.
+ When I took pity on him once on a time and helped his verses into a
+ sort of grammar and sense, I did not think he was a <i>buyer</i> of other
+ men's verses, to be printed as his own; thus he <i>bought</i> two
+ modernisations of Chaucer&mdash;'Ugolino' and another story from Leigh
+ Hunt&mdash;and one, 'Sir Thopas' from Horne, and printed them as his own,
+ as I learned only last week. He paid me extravagant court and, seeing
+ no harm in the mere folly of the man, I was on good terms with him,
+ till ten months ago he grossly insulted a friend of mine who had
+ written an article for the Review&mdash;(which is as good as <i>his</i>, he
+ being a large proprietor of the delectable property, and influencing
+ the voices of his co-mates in council)&mdash;well, he insulted my friend,
+ who had written that article at my special solicitation, and did all
+ he could to avoid paying the price of it&mdash;Why?&mdash;Because the poor
+ creature had actually taken the article to the Editor <i>as one by his
+ friend Serjeant Talfourd contributed for pure love of him, Powell the
+ aforesaid</i>,&mdash;cutting, in consequence, no inglorious figure in the eyes
+ of Printer and Publisher! Now I was away all this time in Italy or he
+ would never have ventured on such a piece of childish impertinence.
+ And my friend being a true gentleman, and quite unused to this sort of
+ 'practice,' in the American sense, held his peace and went without his
+ 'honorarium.' But on my return, I enquired, and made him make a
+ proper application, which Mr. Powell treated with all the insolence in
+ the world&mdash;because, as the event showed, the having to write a cheque
+ for 'the Author of <i>the</i> Article'&mdash;that author's name <i>not</i> being
+ Talfourd's ... <i>there</i> was certain disgrace! Since then (ten months
+ ago) I have never seen him&mdash;and he accuses <i>himself</i>, observe, of
+ 'sucking my plots while I drink his tea'&mdash;one as much as the other!
+ And now why do I tell you this, all of it? Ah,&mdash;now you shall hear!
+ Because, it has often been in my mind to ask you what <i>you</i> know of
+ this Mr. Powell, or ever knew. For he, (being profoundly versed in
+ every sort of untruth, as every fresh experience shows me, and the
+ rest of his acquaintance) he told me long ago, 'he used to correspond
+ with you, and that he quarrelled with you'&mdash;which I supposed to mean
+ that he began by sending you his books (as with one and everybody) and
+ that, in return to your note of acknowledgment, he had chosen to write
+ again, and perhaps, again&mdash;is it so? Do not write one word in answer
+ to me&mdash;the name of such a miserable nullity, and husk of a man, ought
+ not to have a place in your letters&mdash;and <i>that way</i> he would get near
+ to me again; near indeed this time!&mdash;So <i>tell</i> me, in a word&mdash;or do
+ not tell me.
+</p>
+<p>
+ How I never say what I sit down to say! How saying the little makes me
+ want to say the more! How the least of little things, once taken up as
+ a thing to be imparted to you, seems to need explanations and
+ commentaries; all is of importance to me&mdash;every breath you breathe,
+ every little fact (like this) you are to know!
+</p>
+<p>
+ I was out last night&mdash;to see the rest of Frank Talfourd's theatricals;
+ and met Dickens and his set&mdash;so my evenings go away! If I do not bring
+ the <i>Act</i> you must forgive me&mdash;yet I shall, I think; the roughness
+ matters little in this stage. Chorley says very truly that a tragedy
+ implies as much power <i>kept back</i> as brought out&mdash;very true that is. I
+ do not, on the whole, feel dissatisfied&mdash;as was to be but
+ expected&mdash;with the effect of this last&mdash;the <i>shelve</i> of the hill,
+ whence the end is seen, you continuing to go down to it, so that at
+ the very last you may pass off into a plain and so away&mdash;not come to a
+ stop like your horse against a church wall. It is all in long
+ speeches&mdash;the <i>action, proper</i>, is in them&mdash;they are no descriptions,
+ or amplifications&mdash;but here, in a drama of this kind, all the
+ <i>events</i>, (and interest), take place in the <i>minds</i> of the actors ...
+ somewhat like 'Paracelsus' in that respect. You know, or don't know,
+ that the general charge against me, of late, from the few quarters I
+ thought it worth while to listen to, has been that of abrupt,
+ spasmodic writing&mdash;they will find some fault with this, of course.
+</p>
+<p>
+ How you know Chorley! That is precisely the man, that willow blowing
+ now here now there&mdash;precisely! I wish he minded the <i>Athenæum</i>, its
+ silence or eloquence, no more nor less than I&mdash;but he goes on
+ painfully plying me with invitation after invitation, only to show me,
+ I feel confident, that <i>he</i> has no part nor lot in the matter: I have
+ <i>two</i> kind little notes asking me to go on Thursday and Saturday. See
+ the absurd position of us both; he asks more of my presence than he
+ can want, just to show his own kind feeling, of which I do not doubt;
+ and I must try and accept more hospitality than suits me, only to
+ prove my belief in that same! For myself&mdash;if I have vanity which such
+ Journals can raise; would the praise of them raise it, they who
+ praised Mr. Mackay's own, own 'Dead Pan,' quite his own, the other
+ day?&mdash;By the way, Miss Cushman informed me the other evening that the
+ gentleman had written a certain 'Song of the Bell' ... 'singularly
+ like Schiller's; <i>considering that Mr. M. had never</i> seen it!' I am
+ told he writes for the <i>Athenæum</i>, but don't know. Would that sort of
+ praise be flattering, or his holding the tongue&mdash;which Forster, deep
+ in the mysteries of the craft, corroborated my own notion about&mdash;as
+ pure willingness to hurt, and confessed impotence and little clever
+ spite, and enforced sense of what may be safe at the last? You shall
+ see they will not notice&mdash;unless a fresh publication alters the
+ circumstances&mdash;until some seven or eight months&mdash;as before; and then
+ they <i>will</i> notice, and <i>praise</i>, and tell anybody who cares to
+ enquire, '<i>So</i> we noticed the work.' So do not you go expecting
+ justice or injustice till I tell you. It answers me to be found
+ writing so, so anxious to prove I understand the laws of the game,
+ when that game is only 'Thimble-rig' and for prizes of
+ gingerbread-nuts&mdash;Prize or no prize, Mr. Dilke <i>does</i> shift the pea,
+ and so did from the beginning&mdash;as Charles Lamb's pleasant <i>sobriquet</i>
+ (Mr. <i>Bilk</i>, he would have it) testifies. Still he behaved kindly to
+ that poor Frances Brown&mdash;let us forget him.
+</p>
+<p>
+ And now, my Audience, my crown-bearer, my path-preparer&mdash;I am with you
+ again and out of them all&mdash;there, <i>here</i>, in my arms, is my <i>proved
+ palpable success</i>! My life, my poetry, gained nothing, oh no!&mdash;but
+ this found them, and blessed them. On Tuesday I shall see you,
+ dearest&mdash;am much better; well to-day&mdash;are you well&mdash;or 'scarcely to be
+ called an invalid'? Oh, when I <i>have</i> you, am by you&mdash;
+</p>
+<p>
+ Bless you, dearest&mdash;And be very sure you have your wish about the
+ length of the week&mdash;still Tuesday must come! And with it your own,
+ happy, grateful
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">R.B.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>E.B.B. to R.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Tuesday Night.<br>
+[Post-mark, January 14, 1846.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ Ah Mr. Kenyon!&mdash;how he vexed me to-day. To keep away all the ten days
+ before, and to come just at the wrong time after all! It was better
+ for you, I suppose&mdash;believe&mdash;to go with him down-stairs&mdash;yes, it
+ certainly was better: it was disagreeable enough to be very wise! Yet
+ I, being addicted to every sort of superstition turning to melancholy,
+ did hate so breaking off in the middle of that black thread ... (do
+ you remember what we were talking of when they opened the door?) that
+ I was on the point of saying 'Stay one moment,' which I should have
+ repented afterwards for the best of good reasons. Oh, I <i>should</i> have
+ liked to have 'fastened off' that black thread, and taken one stitch
+ with a blue or a green one!
+</p>
+<p>
+ You do not remember what we were talking of? what <i>you</i>, rather, were
+ talking of? And what <i>I</i> remember, at least, because it is exactly the
+ most unkind and hard thing you ever said to me&mdash;ever dearest, so I
+ remember it by that sign! That you should say such a thing to me&mdash;!
+ think what it was, for indeed I will not write it down here&mdash;it would
+ be worse than Mr. Powell! Only the foolishness of it (I mean, the
+ foolishness of it alone) saves it, smooths it to a degree!&mdash;the
+ foolishness being the same as if you asked a man where he would walk
+ when he lost his head. Why, if you had asked St. Denis <i>beforehand</i>,
+ he would have thought it a foolish question.
+</p>
+<p>
+ And you!&mdash;you, who talk so finely of never, never doubting; of being
+ such an example in the way of believing and trusting&mdash;it appears,
+ after all, that you have an imagination apprehensive (or
+ comprehensive) of 'glass bottles' like other sublunary creatures, and
+ worse than some of them. For mark, that I never went any farther than
+ to the stone-wall hypothesis of your forgetting me!&mdash;<i>I</i> always
+ stopped there&mdash;and never climbed, to the top of it over the
+ broken-bottle fortification, to see which way you meant to walk
+ afterwards. And you, to ask me so coolly&mdash;think what you asked me.
+ That you should have the heart to ask such a question!
+</p>
+<p>
+ And the reason&mdash;! and it could seem a reasonable matter of doubt to
+ you whether I would go to the south for my health's sake!&mdash;And I
+ answered quite a common 'no' I believe&mdash;for you bewildered me for the
+ moment&mdash;and I have had tears in my eyes two or three times since, just
+ through thinking back of it all ... of your asking me such questions.
+ Now did I not tell you when I first knew you, that I was leaning out
+ of the window? True, <i>that</i> was&mdash;I was tired of living ...
+ unaffectedly tired. All I cared to live for was to do better some of
+ the work which, after all, was out of myself, and which I had to reach
+ across to do. But I told you. Then, last year, for duty's sake I would
+ have <i>consented</i> to go to Italy! but if you really fancy that I would
+ have struggled in the face of all that difficulty&mdash;or struggled,
+ indeed, anywise, to compass such an object as <i>that</i>&mdash;except for the
+ motive of your caring for it and me&mdash;why you know nothing of me after
+ all&mdash;nothing! And now, take away the motive, and I am where I
+ was&mdash;leaning out of the window again. To put it in plainer words (as
+ you really require information), I should let them do what they liked
+ to me till I was dead&mdash;only I <i>wouldn't go to Italy</i>&mdash;if anybody
+ proposed Italy out of contradiction. In the meantime I do entreat you
+ never to talk of such a thing to me any more.
+</p>
+<p>
+ You know, if you were to leave me by your choice and for your
+ happiness, it would be another thing. It would be very lawful to talk
+ of <i>that</i>.
+</p>
+<p>
+ And observe! I perfectly understand that you did not think of
+ <i>doubting me</i>&mdash;so to speak! But you thought, all the same, that if
+ such a thing happened, I should be capable of doing so and so.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Well&mdash;I am not quarrelling&mdash;I am uneasy about your head rather. That
+ pain in it&mdash;what can it mean? I do beseech you to think of me just so
+ much as will lead you to take regular exercise every day, never
+ missing a day; since to walk till you are tired on Tuesday and then
+ not to walk at all until Friday is <i>not</i> taking exercise, nor the
+ thing required. Ah, if you knew how dreadfully natural every sort of
+ evil seems to my mind, you would not laugh at me for being afraid. I
+ do beseech you, dearest! And then, Sir John Hanmer invited you,
+ besides Mr. Warburton, and suppose you went to <i>him</i> for a very little
+ time&mdash;just for the change of air? or if you went to the coast
+ somewhere. Will you consider, and do what is right, <i>for me</i>? I do not
+ propose that you should go to Italy, observe, nor any great thing at
+ which you might reasonably hesitate. And&mdash;did you ever try smoking as
+ a remedy? If the nerves of the head chiefly are affected it might do
+ you good, I have been thinking. Or without the smoking, to breathe
+ where tobacco is burnt,&mdash;<i>that</i> calms the nervous system in a
+ wonderful manner, as I experienced once myself when, recovering from
+ an illness, I could not sleep, and tried in vain all sorts of
+ narcotics and forms of hop-pillow and inhalation, yet was
+ tranquillized in one half hour by a <i>pinch</i> of <i>tobacco</i> being burnt
+ in a shovel near me. Should you mind it very much? the trying I mean?
+</p>
+<p>
+ <i>Wednesday.</i>&mdash;For '<i>Pauline</i>'&mdash;when I had named it to you I was on the
+ point of sending for the book to the booksellers&mdash;then suddenly I
+ thought to myself that I should wait and hear whether you very, very
+ much would dislike my reading it. See now! Many readers have done
+ virtuously, but <i>I</i>, (in this virtue I tell you of) surpassed them
+ all!&mdash;And now, because I may, I '<i>must</i> read it':&mdash;and as there are
+ misprints to be corrected, will you do what is necessary, or what you
+ think is necessary, and bring me the book on Monday? Do not
+ send&mdash;bring it. In the meanwhile I send back the review which I forgot
+ to give to you yesterday in the confusion. Perhaps you have not read
+ it in your house, and in any case there is no use in my keeping it.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Shall I hear from you, I wonder! Oh my vain thoughts, that will not
+ keep you well! And, ever since you have known me, you have been
+ worse&mdash;<i>that</i>, you confess!&mdash;and what if it should be the crossing of
+ my bad star? <i>You</i> of the 'Crown' and the 'Lyre,' to seek influences
+ from the 'chair of Cassiopeia'! I hope she will forgive me for using
+ her name so! I might as well have compared her to a professorship of
+ poetry in the university of Oxford, according to the latest election.
+ You know, the qualification, there, is,&mdash;<i>not to be a poet</i>.
+</p>
+<p>
+ How vexatious, yesterday! The stars (talking of <i>them</i>) were out of
+ spherical tune, through the damp weather, perhaps, and that scarlet
+ sun was a sign! First Mr. Chorley!&mdash;and last, dear Mr. Kenyon; who
+ <i>will</i> say tiresome things without any provocation. Did you walk with
+ him his way, or did he walk with you yours? or did you only walk
+ down-stairs together?
+</p>
+<p>
+ Write to me! Remember that it is a month to Monday. Think of your very
+ own, who bids God bless you when she prays best for herself!&mdash;
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">E.B.B.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Say particularly how you are&mdash;now do not omit it. And will you have
+ Miss Martineau's books when I can lend them to you? Just at this
+ moment I <i>dare</i> not, because they are reading them here.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Let Mr. Mackay have his full proprietary in his 'Dead Pan'&mdash;which is
+ quite a different conception of the subject, and executed in blank
+ verse too. I have no claims against him, I am sure!
+</p>
+<p>
+ But for the <i>man</i>!&mdash;To call him a poet! A prince and potentate of
+ Commonplaces, such as he is!&mdash;I have seen his name in the <i>Athenæum</i>
+ attached to a lyric or two ... poems, correctly called fugitive,&mdash;more
+ than usually fugitive&mdash;but I never heard before that his hand was in
+ the prose department.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>R.B. to E.B.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Wednesday.<br>
+[Post-mark, January 14, 1846.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ Was I in the wrong, dearest, to go away with Mr. Kenyon? I <i>well knew
+ and felt</i> the price I was about to pay&mdash;but the thought <i>did</i> occur
+ that he might have been informed my probable time of departure was
+ that of his own arrival&mdash;and that he would not know how very soon,
+ alas, I should be <i>obliged</i> to go&mdash;so ... to save you any least
+ embarrassment in the world, I got&mdash;just that shake of the hand, just
+ that look&mdash;and no more! And was it all for nothing, all needless after
+ all? So I said to myself all the way home.
+</p>
+<p>
+ When I am away from you&mdash;a crowd of things press on me for
+ utterance&mdash;'I will say them, not write them,' I think:&mdash;when I see
+ you&mdash;all to be said seems insignificant, irrelevant,&mdash;'they can be
+ written, at all events'&mdash;I think <i>that</i> too. So, feeling so much, I
+ say so little!
+</p>
+<p>
+ I have just returned from Town and write for the Post&mdash;but <i>you</i> mean
+ to write, I trust.
+</p>
+<p>
+ <i>That</i> was not obtained, that promise, to be happy with, as last time!
+</p>
+<p>
+ How are you?&mdash;tell me, dearest; a long week is to be waited now!
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">Bless you, my own, sweetest Ba.</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">I am wholly your</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">R.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>R.B. to E.B.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Thursday.<br>
+[Post-mark, January 15, 1846.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ Dearest, dearer to my heart minute by minute, I had no wish to give
+ you pain, God knows. No one can more readily consent to let a few
+ years more or less of life go out of account,&mdash;be lost&mdash;but as I sate
+ by you, you so full of the truest life, for this world as for the
+ next,&mdash;and was struck by the possibility, all that might happen were I
+ away, in the case of your continuing to acquiesce&mdash;dearest, it <i>is</i>
+ horrible&mdash;could not but speak. If in drawing you, all of you, closer
+ to my heart, I hurt you whom I would&mdash;<i>outlive</i> ... yes,&mdash;cannot speak
+ here&mdash;forgive me, Ba.
+</p>
+<p>
+ My Ba, you are to consider now for me. Your health, your strength, it
+ is all wonderful; that is not my dream, you know&mdash;but what all see.
+ Now, steadily care for us both&mdash;take time, take counsel if you choose;
+ but at the end tell me what you will do for your part&mdash;thinking of me
+ as utterly devoted, soul and body, to you, living wholly in your life,
+ seeing good and ill only as you see,&mdash;being yours as your hand is,&mdash;or
+ as your Flush, rather. Then I will, on my side, prepare. When I say
+ 'take counsel'&mdash;I reserve my last right, the man's right of first
+ speech. <i>I</i> stipulate, too, and require to say my own speech in my own
+ words or by letter&mdash;remember! But this living without you is too
+ tormenting now. So begin thinking,&mdash;as for Spring, as for a New Year,
+ as for a new life.
+</p>
+<p>
+ I went no farther than the door with Mr. Kenyon. He must see the
+ truth; and&mdash;you heard the playful words which had a meaning all the
+ same.
+</p>
+<p>
+ No more of this; only, think of it for me, love!
+</p>
+<p>
+ One of these days I shall write a long letter&mdash;on the omitted matters,
+ unanswered questions, in your past letters. The present joy still
+ makes me ungrateful to the previous one; but I remember. We are to
+ live together one day, love!
+</p>
+<p>
+ Will you let Mr. Poe's book lie on the table on Monday, if you please,
+ that I may read what he <i>does</i> say, with my own eyes? <i>That</i> I meant
+ to ask, too!
+</p>
+<p>
+ How too, too kind you are&mdash;how you care for so little that affects me!
+ I am very much better&mdash;I went out yesterday, as you found: to-day I
+ shall walk, beside seeing Chorley. And certainly, certainly I would go
+ away for a week, if so I might escape being ill (and away from you) a
+ fortnight; but I am <i>not</i> ill&mdash;and will care, as you bid me, beloved!
+ So, you will send, and take all trouble; and all about that crazy
+ Review! Now, you should not!&mdash;I will consider about your goodness. I
+ hardly know if I care to read that kind of book just now.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Will you, and must you have 'Pauline'? If I could pray you to revoke
+ that decision! For it is altogether foolish and <i>not</i> boylike&mdash;and I
+ shall, I confess, hate the notion of running over it&mdash;yet commented
+ it must be; more than mere correction! I was unluckily
+ <i>precocious</i>&mdash;but I had rather you <i>saw</i> real infantine efforts
+ (verses at six years old, and drawings still earlier) than this
+ ambiguous, feverish&mdash;Why not wait? When you speak of the
+ 'Bookseller'&mdash;I smile, in glorious security&mdash;having a whole bale of
+ sheets at the house-top. He never knew my name even!&mdash;and I withdrew
+ these after a very little time.
+</p>
+<p>
+ And now&mdash;here is a vexation. May I be with you (for this once) next
+ Monday, at <i>two</i> instead of <i>three</i> o'clock? Forster's business with
+ the new Paper obliges him, he says, to restrict his choice of days to
+ <i>Monday</i> next&mdash;and give up <i>my</i> part of Monday I will never for fifty
+ Forsters&mdash;now, sweet, mind that! Monday is no common day, but leads to
+ a <i>Saturday</i>&mdash;and if, as I ask, I get leave to call at 2&mdash;and to stay
+ till 3-1/2&mdash;though I then lose nearly half an hour&mdash;yet all will be
+ comparatively well. If there is any difficulty&mdash;one word and I
+ re-appoint our party, his and mine, for the day the paper breaks
+ down&mdash;not so long to wait, it strikes me!
+</p>
+<p>
+ Now, bless you, my precious Ba&mdash;I am your own&mdash;
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">&mdash;Your own R.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>E.B.B. to R.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Thursday Morning.<br>
+[Post-mark, January 17, 1846.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ Our letters have crossed; and, mine being the longest, I have a right
+ to expect another directly, I think. I have been calculating: and it
+ seems to me&mdash;now what I am going to say may take its place among the
+ paradoxes,&mdash;that I gain most by the short letters. Last week the only
+ long one came last, and I was quite contented that the 'old friend'
+ should come to see you on Saturday and make you send me two instead of
+ the single one I looked for: it was a clear gain, the little short
+ note, and the letter arrived all the same. I remember, when I was a
+ child, liking to have two shillings and sixpence better than half a
+ crown&mdash;and now it is the same with this fairy money, which will never
+ turn all into pebbles, or beans, whatever the chronicles may say of
+ precedents.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Arabel did tell Mr. Kenyon (she told me) that 'Mr. Browning would soon
+ go away'&mdash;in reply to an observation of his, that 'he would not stay
+ as I had company'; and altogether it was better,&mdash;the lamp made it
+ look late. But you do not appear in the least remorseful for being
+ tempted of my black devil, my familiar, to ask such questions and
+ leave me under such an impression&mdash;'mens conscia recti' too!!&mdash;
+</p>
+<p>
+ And Mr. Kenyon will not come until next Monday perhaps. How am I? But
+ I am too well to be asked about. Is it not a warm summer? The weather
+ is as 'miraculous' as the rest, I think. It is you who are unwell and
+ make people uneasy, dearest. Say how you are, and promise me to do
+ what is right and try to be better. The walking, the changing of the
+ air, the leaving off Luria ... do what is right, I earnestly beseech
+ you. The other day, I heard of Tennyson being ill again, ... too ill
+ to write a simple note to his friend Mr. Venables, who told George. A
+ little more than a year ago, it would have been no worse a thing to me
+ to hear of your being ill than to hear of his being ill!&mdash;How the
+ world has changed since then! To <i>me</i>, I mean.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Did I say <i>that</i> ever ... that 'I knew you must be tired?' And it was
+ not even so true as that the coming event threw its shadow before?
+</p>
+<p>
+ <i>Thursday night.</i>&mdash;I have begun on another sheet&mdash;I could not write
+ here what was in my heart&mdash;yet I send you this paper besides to show
+ how I was writing to you this morning. In the midst of it came a
+ female friend of mine and broke the thread&mdash;the visible thread, that
+ is.
+</p>
+<p>
+ And now, even now, at this safe eight o'clock, I could not be safe
+ from somebody, who, in her goodnature and my illfortune, must come and
+ sit by me&mdash;and when my letter was come&mdash;'why wouldn't I read it? What
+ wonderful politeness on my part.' She would not and could not consent
+ to keep me from reading my letter. She would stand up by the fire
+ rather.
+</p>
+<p>
+ No, no, three times no. Brummel got into the carriage before the
+ Regent, ... (didn't he?) but I persisted in not reading my letter in
+ the presence of my friend. A notice on my punctiliousness may be put
+ down to-night in her 'private diary.' I kept the letter in my hand and
+ only read it with those sapient ends of the fingers which the
+ mesmerists make so much ado about, and which really did seem to touch
+ a little of what was inside. Not <i>all</i>, however, happily for me! Or my
+ friend would have seen in my eyes what <i>they</i> did not see.
+</p>
+<p>
+ May God bless you! Did I ever say that I had an objection to read the
+ verses at six years old&mdash;or see the drawings either? I am reasonable,
+ you observe! Only, 'Pauline,' I must have <i>some day</i>&mdash;why not without
+ the emendations? But if you insist on them, I will agree to wait a
+ little&mdash;if you promise <i>at last</i> to let me see the book, which I will
+ not show. Some day, then! you shall not be vexed nor hurried for the
+ day&mdash;some day. Am I not generous? And <i>I</i> was 'precocious' too, and
+ used to make rhymes over my bread and milk when I was nearly a baby
+ ... only really it was mere echo-verse, that of mine, and had nothing
+ of mark or of indication, such as I do not doubt that yours had. I
+ used to write of virtue with a large 'V,' and 'Oh Muse' with a harp,
+ and things of that sort. At nine years old I wrote what I called 'an
+ epic'&mdash;and at ten, various tragedies, French and English, which we
+ used to act in the nursery. There was a French 'hexameter' tragedy on
+ the subject of Regulus&mdash;but I cannot even smile to think of it now,
+ there are so many grave memories&mdash;which time has made grave&mdash;hung
+ around it. How I remember sitting in 'my house under the sideboard,'
+ in the dining-room, concocting one of the soliloquies beginning
+</p>
+<blockquote><blockquote><blockquote><blockquote><blockquote><blockquote><p style="text-indent: 0em">Que suis je? autrefois un général Remain:<br>
+Maintenant esclave de Carthage je souffre en vain.
+</p>
+</blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote>
+<p style="text-indent: 0em">Poor Regulus!&mdash;Can't you conceive how fine it must have been
+ altogether? And these were my 'maturer works,' you are to understand,
+ ... and 'the moon was bright at ten o'clock at night' years before. As
+ to the gods and goddesses, I believed in them all quite seriously, and
+ reconciled them to Christianity, which I believed in too after a
+ fashion, as some greater philosophers have done&mdash;and went out one day
+ with my pinafore full of little sticks (and a match from the
+ housemaid's cupboard) to sacrifice to the blue-eyed Minerva who was my
+ favourite goddess on the whole because she cared for Athens. As soon
+ as I began to doubt about my goddesses, I fell into a vague sort of
+ general scepticism, ... and though I went on saying 'the Lord's
+ prayer' at nights and mornings, and the 'Bless all my kind friends'
+ afterwards, by the childish custom ... yet I ended this liturgy with a
+ supplication which I found in 'King's Memoirs' and which took my fancy
+ and met my general views exactly.... 'O God, if there be a God, save
+ my soul if I have a soul.' Perhaps the theology of many thoughtful
+ children is scarcely more orthodox than this: but indeed it is
+ wonderful to myself sometimes how I came to escape, on the whole, as
+ well as I have done, considering the commonplaces of education in
+ which I was set, with strength and opportunity for breaking the bonds
+ all round into liberty and license. Papa used to say ... 'Don't read
+ Gibbon's history&mdash;it's not a proper book. Don't read "Tom Jones"&mdash;and
+ none of the books on <i>this</i> side, mind!' So I was very obedient and
+ never touched the books on <i>that</i> side, and only read instead Tom
+ Paine's 'Age of Reason,' and Voltaire's 'Philosophical Dictionary,'
+ and Hume's 'Essays,' and Werther, and Rousseau, and Mary
+ Wollstonecraft ... books, which I was never suspected of looking
+ towards, and which were not 'on <i>that</i> side' certainly, but which did
+ as well.
+</p>
+<p>
+ How I am writing!&mdash;And what are the questions you did not answer? I
+ shall remember them by the answers I suppose&mdash;but your letters always
+ have a fulness to me and I never seem to wish for what is not in them.
+</p>
+<p>
+ But this is the end <i>indeed</i>.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>E.B.B. to R.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Thursday Night.<br>
+[In the same envelope with the preceding letter.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ Ever dearest&mdash;how you can write touching things to me; and how my
+ whole being vibrates, as a string, to these! How have I deserved from
+ God and you all that I thank you for? Too unworthy I am of all! Only,
+ it was not, dearest beloved, what you feared, that was 'horrible,' it
+ was what you <i>supposed</i>, rather! It was a mistake of yours. And now we
+ will not talk of it any more.
+</p>
+<p>
+ <i>Friday morning.</i>&mdash;For the rest, I will think as you desire: but I
+ have thought a great deal, and there are certainties which I know; and
+ I hope we <i>both</i> are aware that nothing can be more hopeless than our
+ position in some relations and aspects, though you do not guess
+ perhaps that the very approach to the subject is shut up by dangers,
+ and that from the moment of a suspicion entering <i>one</i> mind, we should
+ be able to meet never again in this room, nor to have intercourse by
+ letter through the ordinary channel. I mean, that letters of yours,
+ addressed to me here, would infallibly be stopped and destroyed&mdash;if
+ not opened. Therefore it is advisable to hurry on nothing&mdash;on these
+ grounds it is advisable. What should I do if I did not see you nor
+ hear from you, without being able to feel that it was for your
+ happiness? What should I do for a month even? And then, I might be
+ thrown out of the window or its equivalent&mdash;I look back shuddering to
+ the dreadful scenes in which poor Henrietta was involved who never
+ offended as I have offended ... years ago which seem as present as
+ to-day. She had forbidden the subject to be referred to until that
+ consent was obtained&mdash;and at a word she gave up all&mdash;at a word. In
+ fact she had no true attachment, as I observed to Arabel at the
+ time&mdash;a child never submitted more meekly to a revoked holiday. Yet
+ how she was made to suffer. Oh, the dreadful scenes! and only because
+ she had seemed to feel a little. I told you, I think, that there was
+ an obliquity&mdash;an eccentricity, or something beyond&mdash;on one class of
+ subjects. I hear how her knees were made to ring upon the floor, now!
+ she was carried out of the room in strong hysterics, and I, who rose
+ up to follow her, though I was quite well at that time and suffered
+ only by sympathy, fell flat down upon my face in a fainting-fit.
+ Arabel thought I was dead.
+</p>
+<p>
+ I have tried to forget it all&mdash;but now I must remember&mdash;and throughout
+ our intercourse <i>I have remembered</i>. It is necessary to remember so
+ much as to avoid such evils as are inevitable, and for this reason I
+ would conceal nothing from you. Do <i>you</i> remember, besides, that there
+ can be no faltering on my 'part,' and that, if I should remain well,
+ which is not proved yet, I will do for you what you please and as you
+ please to have it done. But there is time for considering!
+</p>
+<p>
+ Only ... as you speak of 'counsel,' I will take courage to tell you
+ that my <i>sisters know</i>, Arabel is in most of my confidences, and being
+ often in the room with me, taxed me with the truth long ago&mdash;she saw
+ that I was affected from some cause&mdash;and I told her. We are as safe
+ with both of them as possible ... and they thoroughly understand that
+ <i>if there should be any change it would not be your fault</i>.... I made
+ them understand that thoroughly. From themselves I have received
+ nothing but the most smiling words of kindness and satisfaction (I
+ thought I might tell you so much), they have too much tenderness for
+ me to fail in it now. My brothers, it is quite necessary not to draw
+ into a dangerous responsibility. I have felt that from the beginning,
+ and shall continue to feel it&mdash;though I hear and can observe that they
+ are full of suspicions and conjectures, which are never unkindly
+ expressed. I told you once that we held hands the faster in this house
+ for the weight over our heads. But the absolute <i>knowledge</i> would be
+ dangerous for my brothers: with my sisters it is different, and I
+ could not continue to conceal from <i>them</i> what they had under their
+ eyes; and then, Henrietta is in a like position. It was not wrong of
+ me to let them know it?&mdash;no?
+</p>
+<p>
+ Yet of what consequence is all this to the other side of the question?
+ What, if <i>you</i> should give pain and disappointment where you owe such
+ pure gratitude. But we need not talk of these things now. Only you
+ have more to consider than <i>I</i>, I imagine, while the future comes on.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Dearest, let me have my way in one thing: let me see you on <i>Tuesday</i>
+ instead of on Monday&mdash;on Tuesday at the old hour. Be reasonable and
+ consider. Tuesday is almost as near as the day before it; and on
+ Monday, I shall be hurried at first, lest Papa should be still in the
+ house, (no harm, but an excuse for nervousness: and I can't quote a
+ noble Roman as you can, to the praise of my conscience!) and <i>you</i>
+ will be hurried at last, lest you should not be in time for Mr.
+ Forster. On the other hand, I will not let you be rude to the <i>Daily
+ News</i>, ... no, nor to the <i>Examiner</i>. Come on Tuesday, then, instead
+ of Monday, and let us have the usual hours in a peaceable way,&mdash;and if
+ there is no obstacle,&mdash;that is, if Mr. Kenyon or some equivalent
+ authority should not take note of your being here on Tuesday, why you
+ can come again on the Saturday afterwards&mdash;I do not see the
+ difficulty. Are we agreed? On Tuesday, at three o'clock. Consider,
+ besides, that the Monday arrangement would hurry you in every manner,
+ and leave you fagged for the evening&mdash;no, I will not hear of it. Not
+ on my account, not on yours!
+</p>
+<p>
+ Think of me on Monday instead, and write before. Are not these two
+ lawful letters? And do not they deserve an answer?
+</p>
+<p>
+ My life was ended when I knew you, and if I survive myself it is for
+ your sake:&mdash;<i>that</i> resumes all my feelings and intentions in respect
+ to you. No 'counsel' could make the difference of a grain of dust in
+ the balance. It <i>is so</i>, and not otherwise. If you changed towards me,
+ it would be better for you I believe&mdash;and I should be only where I was
+ before. While you do <i>not</i> change, I look to you for my first
+ affections and my first duty&mdash;and nothing but your bidding me, could
+ make me look away.
+</p>
+<p>
+ In the midst of this, Mr. Kenyon came and I felt as if I could not
+ talk to him. No&mdash;he does not 'see how it is.' He may have passing
+ thoughts sometimes, but they do not stay long enough to produce&mdash;even
+ an opinion. He asked if you had been here long.
+</p>
+<p>
+ It may be wrong and ungrateful, but I do wish sometimes that the world
+ were away&mdash;even the good Kenyon-aspect of the world.
+</p>
+<p>
+ And so, once more&mdash;may God bless you!
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">I am wholly yours&mdash;
+</p>
+<p>
+ <i>Tuesday</i>, remember! And say that you agree.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>R.B. to E.B.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Saturday.<br>
+[Post-mark, January 17, 1846.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ Did my own Ba, in the prosecution of her studies, get to a book on the
+ forb&mdash;no, <i>un</i>forbidden shelf&mdash;wherein Voltaire pleases to say that
+ 'si Dieu n'existait pas, il faudrait l'inventer'? I feel, after
+ reading these letters,&mdash;as ordinarily after seeing you, sweetest, or
+ hearing from you,&mdash;that if <i>marriage</i> did not exist, I should
+ infallibly <i>invent</i> it. I should say, no words, no <i>feelings</i> even,
+ do justice to the whole conviction and <i>religion</i> of my soul&mdash;and
+ though they may be suffered to represent some one minute's phase of
+ it, yet, in their very fulness and passion they do injustice to the
+ <i>unrepresented, other minute's</i>, depth and breadth of love ... which
+ let my whole life (I would say) be devoted to telling and proving and
+ exemplifying, if not in one, then in another way&mdash;let me have the
+ plain palpable power of this; the assured time for this ... something
+ of the satisfaction ... (but for the fantasticalness of the
+ illustration) ... something like the earnestness of some suitor in
+ Chancery if he could once get Lord Lyndhurst into a room with him, and
+ lock the door on them both, and know that his whole story <i>must</i> be
+ listened to now, and the 'rights of it,'&mdash;dearest, the love unspoken
+ now you are to hear 'in all time of our tribulation, in all time of
+ our wealth ... at the hour of death, and'&mdash;
+</p>
+<p>
+ If I did not <i>know</i> this was so,&mdash;nothing would have been said, or
+ sought for. Your friendship, the perfect pride in it, the wish for,
+ and eager co-operation in, your welfare, all that is different, and,
+ seen now, nothing.
+</p>
+<p>
+ I will care for it no more, dearest&mdash;I am wedded to you now. I believe
+ no human being could love you more&mdash;that thought consoles me for my
+ own imperfection&mdash;for when <i>that</i> does strike me, as so often it will,
+ I turn round on my pursuing self, and ask 'What if it were a claim
+ then, what is in Her, demanded rationally, equitably, in return for
+ what were in you&mdash;do you like <i>that</i> way!'&mdash;And I do <i>not</i>, Ba&mdash;you,
+ even, might not&mdash;when people everyday buy improveable ground, and
+ eligible sites for building, and don't want every inch filled up,
+ covered over, done to their hands! So take me, and make me what you
+ can and will&mdash;and though never to be <i>more</i> yours, yet more <i>like</i>
+ you, I may and must be&mdash;Yes, indeed&mdash;best, only love!
+</p>
+<p>
+ And am I not grateful to your sisters&mdash;entirely grateful for that
+ crowning comfort; it is 'miraculous,' too, if you please&mdash;for <i>you</i>
+ shall know me by finger-tip intelligence or any art magic of old or
+ new times&mdash;but they do not see me, know me&mdash;and must moreover be
+ jealous of you, chary of you, as the daughters of Hesperus, of
+ wonderers and wistful lookers up at the gold apple&mdash;yet instead of
+ 'rapidly levelling eager eyes'&mdash;they are indulgent? Then&mdash;shall I wish
+ capriciously they were <i>not</i> your sisters, not so near you, that there
+ might be a kind of grace in loving them for it'&mdash;but what grace can
+ there be when ... yes, I will tell you&mdash;<i>no</i>, I will not&mdash;it is
+ foolish!&mdash;and it is <i>not</i> foolish in me to love the table and chairs
+ and vases in your room.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Let me finish writing to-morrow; it would not become me to utter a
+ word against the arrangement&mdash;and Saturday promised, too&mdash;but though
+ all concludes against the early hour on Monday, yet&mdash;but this is
+ wrong&mdash;on Tuesday it shall be, then,&mdash;thank you, dearest! you let me
+ keep up the old proper form, do you not?&mdash;I shall continue to thank,
+ and be gratified &amp;c. as if I had some untouched fund of thanks at my
+ disposal to cut a generous figure with on occasion! And so, now, for
+ your kind considerateness thank <i>you ... that I say</i>, which, God
+ knows, <i>could</i> not say, if I died ten deaths in one to do you good,
+ 'you are repaid'&mdash;
+</p>
+<p>
+ To-morrow I will write, and answer more. I am pretty well, and will go
+ out to-day&mdash;to-night. My Act is done, and copied&mdash;I will bring it. Do
+ you see the <i>Athenæum</i>? By Chorley surely&mdash;and kind and satisfactory.
+ I did not expect any notice for a long time&mdash;all that about the
+ 'mist,' 'unchanged manner' and the like is politic concession to the
+ Powers that Be ... because he might tell me that and much more with
+ his own lips or unprofessional pen, and be thanked into the bargain,
+ yet he does not. But I fancy he saves me from a rougher hand&mdash;the long
+ extracts answer every purpose&mdash;
+</p>
+<p>
+ There is all to say yet&mdash;to-morrow!
+</p>
+<p>
+ And ever, ever your own; God bless you!
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">R.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Admire the clean paper.... I did not notice that I have been writing in
+ a desk where a candle fell! See the bottoms of the other pages!
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>R.B. to E.B.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Sunday Evening.<br>
+[Post-mark, January 19, 1846.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ You may have seen, I put off all the weighty business part of the
+ letter&mdash;but I shall do very little with it now. To be sure, a few
+ words will serve, because you understand me, and believe in <i>enough</i>
+ of me. First, then, I am wholly satisfied, thoroughly made happy in
+ your assurance. I would build up an infinity of lives, if I could plan
+ them, one on the other, and all resting on you, on your word&mdash;I fully
+ believe in it,&mdash;of my feeling, the gratitude, let there be no attempt
+ to speak. And for 'waiting'; 'not hurrying',&mdash;I leave all with you
+ henceforth&mdash;all you say is most wise, most convincing.
+</p>
+<p>
+ On the saddest part of all,&mdash;silence. You understand, and I can
+ understand through you. Do you know, that I never <i>used</i> to dream
+ unless indisposed, and rarely then&mdash;(of late I dream of you, but quite
+ of late)&mdash;and <i>those</i> nightmare dreams have invariably been of <i>one</i>
+ sort. I stand by (powerless to interpose by a word even) and see the
+ infliction of tyranny on the unresisting man or beast (generally the
+ last)&mdash;and I wake just in time not to die: let no one try this kind of
+ experiment on me or mine! Though I have observed that by a felicitous
+ arrangement, the man with the whip puts it into use with an old horse
+ commonly. I once knew a fine specimen of the boilingly passionate,
+ desperately respectable on the Eastern principle that reverences a
+ madman&mdash;and this fellow, whom it was to be death to oppose, (some
+ bloodvessel was to break)&mdash;he, once at a dinner party at which I was
+ present, insulted his wife (a young pretty simple believer in his
+ awful immunities from the ordinary terms that keep men in
+ order)&mdash;brought the tears into her eyes and sent her from the room ...
+ purely to 'show off' in the eyes of his guests ... (all males,
+ law-friends &amp;c., he being a lawyer.) This feat accomplished, he, too,
+ left us with an affectation of compensating relentment, to 'just say a
+ word and return'&mdash;and no sooner was his back to the door than the
+ biggest, stupidest of the company began to remark 'what a fortunate
+ thing it was that Mr. So-and-so had such a submissive wife&mdash;not one of
+ the women who would resist&mdash;that is, attempt to resist&mdash;and so
+ exasperate our gentleman into ... Heaven only knew what!' I said it
+ <i>was</i>, in one sense, a fortunate thing; because one of these women,
+ without necessarily being the lion-tressed Bellona, would richly give
+ him his desert, I thought&mdash;'Oh, indeed?' No&mdash;<i>this</i> man was not to be
+ opposed&mdash;wait, you might, till the fit was over, and then try what
+ kind argument would do&mdash;and so forth to unspeakable nausea. Presently
+ we went up-stairs&mdash;there sate the wife with dried eyes, and a smile at
+ the tea-table&mdash;and by her, in all the pride of conquest, with her hand
+ in his, our friend&mdash;disposed to be very good-natured of course. I
+ listened <i>arrectis auribus</i>, and in a minute he said he did not know
+ somebody I mentioned. I told him, <i>that</i> I easily conceived&mdash;such a
+ person would never condescend to know <i>him</i>, &amp;c., and treated him to
+ every consequence ingenuity could draw from that text&mdash;and at the end
+ marched out of the room; and the valorous man, who had sate like a
+ post, got up, took a candle, followed me to the door, and only said in
+ unfeigned wonder, 'What <i>can</i> have possessed you, my <i>dear</i> B?'&mdash;All
+ which I as much expected beforehand, as that the above mentioned man
+ of the whip keeps quiet in the presence of an ordinary-couraged dog.
+ All this is quite irrelevant to <i>the</i> case&mdash;indeed, I write to get rid
+ of the thought altogether. But I do hold it the most stringent duty of
+ all who can, to stop a condition, a relation of one human being to
+ another which God never allowed to exist between Him and ourselves.
+ <i>Trees</i> live and die, if you please, and accept will for a law&mdash;but
+ with us, all commands surely refer to a previously-implanted
+ conviction in ourselves of their rationality and justice. Or why
+ declare that 'the Lord <i>is</i> holy, just and good' unless there is
+ recognised and independent conception of holiness and goodness, to
+ which the subsequent assertion is referable? 'You know what <i>holiness</i>
+ is, what it is to be good? Then, He <i>is</i> that'&mdash;not, '<i>that</i> is
+ <i>so</i>&mdash;because <i>he</i> is that'; though, of course, when once the converse
+ is demonstrated, this, too, follows, and may be urged for practical
+ purposes. All God's urgency, so to speak, is on the <i>justice</i> of his
+ judgments, <i>rightness</i> of his rule: yet why? one might ask&mdash;if one
+ does believe that the rule <i>is</i> his; why ask further?&mdash;Because, his is
+ a 'reasonable service,' once for all.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Understand why I turn my thoughts in this direction. If it is indeed
+ as you fear, and no endeavour, concession, on my part will avail,
+ under any circumstances&mdash;(and by endeavour, I mean all heart and soul
+ could bring the flesh to perform)&mdash;in that case, you will not come to
+ me with a shadow past hope of chasing.
+</p>
+<p>
+ The likelihood is, I over frighten myself for you, by the involuntary
+ contrast with those here&mdash;you allude to them&mdash;if I went with this
+ letter downstairs and said simply 'I want this taken to the direction
+ to-night, and am unwell and unable to go, will you take it now?' my
+ father would not say a word, or rather would say a dozen cheerful
+ absurdities about his 'wanting a walk,' 'just having been wishing to
+ go out' &amp;c. At night he sits studying my works&mdash;illustrating them (I
+ will bring you drawings to make you laugh)&mdash;and <i>yesterday</i> I picked
+ up a crumpled bit of paper ... 'his notion of what a criticism on this
+ last number ought to be,&mdash;none, that have appeared, satisfying
+ him!'&mdash;So judge of what he will say! And my mother loves me just as
+ much more as must of necessity be.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Once more, understand all this ... for the clock scares me of a
+ sudden&mdash;I meant to say more&mdash;far more.
+</p>
+<p>
+ But may God bless you ever&mdash;my own dearest, my Ba&mdash;
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">I am wholly your R.
+</p>
+<p>
+ <i>(Tuesday)</i>
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>E.B.B. to R.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Sunday.<br>
+[Post-mark, January 19, 1846.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ Your letter came just after the hope of one had past&mdash;the latest
+ Saturday post had gone, they said, and I was beginning to be as vexed
+ as possible, looking into the long letterless Sunday. Then, suddenly
+ came the knock&mdash;the postman redivivus&mdash;just when it seemed so beyond
+ hoping for&mdash;it was half past eight, observe, and there had been a post
+ at nearly eight&mdash;suddenly came the knock, and your letter with it. Was
+ I not glad, do you think?
+</p>
+<p>
+ And you call the <i>Athenæum</i> 'kind and satisfactory'? Well&mdash;I was angry
+ instead. To make us wait so long for an 'article' like <i>that</i>, was not
+ over-kind certainly, nor was it 'satisfactory' to class your peculiar
+ qualities with other contemporary ones, as if they were not peculiar.
+ It seemed to me cold and cautious, from the causes perhaps which you
+ mention, but the extracts will work their own way with everybody who
+ knows what poetry is, and for others, let the critic do his worst with
+ them. For what is said of 'mist' I have no patience because I who know
+ when you are obscure and never think of denying it in some of your
+ former works, do hold that this last number is as clear and
+ self-sufficing to a common understanding, as far as the expression and
+ medium goes, as any book in the world, and that Mr. Chorley was bound
+ in verity to say so. If I except that one stanza, you know, it is to
+ make the general observation stronger. And then 'mist' is an infamous
+ word for your kind of obscurity. You never <i>are</i> misty, not even in
+ 'Sordello'&mdash;never vague. Your graver cuts deep sharp lines,
+ always&mdash;and there is an extra-distinctness in your images and
+ thoughts, from the midst of which, crossing each other infinitely, the
+ general significance seems to escape. So that to talk of a 'mist,'
+ when you are obscurest, is an impotent thing to do. Indeed it makes me
+ angry.
+</p>
+<p>
+ But the suggested virtue of 'self-renunciation' only made me smile,
+ because it is simply nonsense ... nonsense which proves itself to be
+ nonsense at a glance. So genius is to renounce itself&mdash;<i>that</i> is the
+ new critical doctrine, is it? Now is it not foolish? To recognize the
+ poetical faculty of a man, and then to instruct him in
+ 'self-renunciation' in that very relation&mdash;or rather, to hint the
+ virtue of it, and hesitate the dislike of his doing otherwise? What
+ atheists these critics are after all&mdash;and how the old heathens
+ understood the divinity of gifts better, beyond any comparison. We may
+ take shame to ourselves, looking back.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Now, shall I tell you what I did yesterday? It was so warm, so warm,
+ the thermometer at 68 in this room, that I took it into my head to
+ call it April instead of January, and put on a cloak and walked
+ down-stairs into the drawing-room&mdash;walked, mind! Before, I was carried
+ by one of my brothers,&mdash;even to the last autumn-day when I went out&mdash;I
+ never walked a step for fear of the cold in the passages. But
+ yesterday it was so wonderfully warm, and I so strong besides&mdash;it was
+ a feat worthy of the day&mdash;and I surprised them all as much as if I had
+ walked out of the window instead. That kind dear Stormie, who with all
+ his shyness and awkwardness has the most loving of hearts in him, said
+ that he was '<i>so</i> glad to see me'!
+</p>
+<p>
+ Well!&mdash;setting aside the glory of it, it would have been as wise
+ perhaps if I had abstained; our damp detestable climate reaches us
+ otherwise than by cold, and I am not quite as well as usual this
+ morning after an uncomfortable feverish night&mdash;not very unwell, mind,
+ nor unwell at all in the least degree of consequence&mdash;and I tell you,
+ only to show how susceptible I really am still, though 'scarcely an
+ invalid,' say the complimenters.
+</p>
+<p>
+ What a way I am from your letter&mdash;that letter&mdash;or seem to be
+ rather&mdash;for one may think of one thing and yet go on writing
+ distrustedly of other things. So you are 'grateful' to my sisters ...
+ <i>you</i>! Now I beseech you not to talk such extravagances; I mean such
+ extravagances as words like these <i>imply</i>&mdash;and there are far worse
+ words than these, in the letter ... such as I need not put my finger
+ on; words which are sense on my lips, but no sense at all on yours,
+ and which make me disquietedly sure that you are under an illusion.
+ Observe!&mdash;<i>certainly</i> I should not choose to have a '<i>claim</i>,' see!
+ Only, what I object to, in 'illusions,' 'miracles,' and things of that
+ sort, is the want of continuity common to such. When Joshua caused the
+ sun to stand still, it was not for a year even!&mdash;Ungrateful, I am!
+</p>
+<p>
+ And 'pretty well' means 'not well' I am afraid&mdash;or I should be gladder
+ still of the new act. You will tell me on Tuesday what 'pretty well'
+ means, and if your mother is better&mdash;or I may have a letter
+ to-morrow&mdash;dearest! May God bless you!
+</p>
+<p>
+ To-morrow too, at half past three o'clock, how joyful I shall be that
+ my 'kind considerateness' decided not to receive you until Tuesday. My
+ very kind considerateness, which made me eat my dinner to-day!
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">Your own</p>
+<p style="text-align: right"><SPAN class="sc-ex">Ba</span>.
+</p>
+<p>
+ A hundred letters I have, by this last, ... to set against Napoleon's
+ Hundred Days&mdash;did you know <i>that</i>?
+</p>
+<p>
+ So much better I am to-night: it was nothing but a little chill from
+ the damp&mdash;the fog, you see!
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>R.B. to E.B.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Monday Morning.<br>
+[Post-mark, January 19, 1846.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ Love, if you knew but how vexed I was, so very few minutes after my
+ note left last night; how angry with the unnecessary harshness into
+ which some of the phrases might be construed&mdash;you would forgive me,
+ indeed. But, when all is confessed and forgiven, the fact
+ remains&mdash;that it would be the one trial I <i>know</i> I should not be able
+ to bear; the repetition of these 'scenes'&mdash;intolerable&mdash;not to be
+ written of, even my mind <i>refuses</i> to form a clear conception of them.
+</p>
+<p>
+ My own loved letter is come&mdash;and the news; of which the reassuring
+ postscript lets the interrupted joy flow on again. Well, and I am not
+ to be grateful for that; nor that you <i>do</i> 'eat your dinner'? Indeed
+ you will be ingenious to prevent me! I fancy myself meeting you on
+ 'the stairs'&mdash;stairs and passages generally, and galleries (ah, thou
+ indeed!) all, with their picturesque <i>accidents</i>, of landing-places,
+ and spiral heights and depths, and sudden turns and visions of half
+ open doors into what Quarles calls 'mollitious chambers'&mdash;and above
+ all, <i>landing-places</i>&mdash;they are my heart's delight&mdash;I would come upon
+ you unaware in a landing-place in my next dream! One day we may walk
+ on the galleries round and over the inner court of the Doges' Palace
+ at Venice; and read, on tablets against the wall, how such an one was
+ banished for an 'enormous dig (intacco) into the public
+ treasure'&mdash;another for ... what you are not to know because his
+ friends have got chisels and chipped away the record of it&mdash;underneath
+ the 'giants' on their stands, and in the midst of the <i>cortile</i> the
+ bronze fountains whence the girls draw water.
+</p>
+<p>
+ So <i>you</i> too wrote French verses?&mdash;Mine were of less lofty
+ argument&mdash;one couplet makes me laugh now for the reason of its false
+ quantity&mdash;I translated the Ode of Alcæus; and the last couplet ran
+ thus....
+</p>
+<blockquote><blockquote><blockquote><blockquote><blockquote><blockquote><p style="text-indent: 0em">Harmodius, et toi, cher Aristogiton!</p>
+<p style="text-indent: 0em">*&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; *&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; *&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; *&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; *&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; *&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; *</p>
+<p style="text-indent: 0em">*&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; *&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; *&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; *&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; *&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; *&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; *</p>
+<p style="text-indent: 0em">Comme l'astre du jour, brillera votre nom!
+</p>
+</blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote>
+<p style="text-indent: 0em">The fact was, I could not bear to hurt my French Master's
+ feelings&mdash;who inveterately maltreated 'ai's and oi's' and in this
+ instance, an 'ei.' But 'Pauline' is altogether of a different sort of
+ precocity&mdash;you shall see it when I can master resolution to transcribe
+ the explanation which I know is on the fly-leaf of a copy here. Of
+ that work, the <i>Athenæum</i> said [several words erased] now, what
+ outrageous folly! I care, and you care, precisely nothing about its
+ sayings and doings&mdash;yet here I talk!
+</p>
+<p>
+ Now to you&mdash;Ba! When I go through sweetness to sweetness, at 'Ba' I
+ stop last of all, and lie and rest. That is the quintessence of them
+ all,&mdash;they all take colour and flavour from that. So, dear, dear Ba,
+ be glad as you can to see me to-morrow. God knows how I embalm every
+ such day,&mdash;I do not believe that one of the <i>forty</i> is confounded with
+ another in my memory. So, <i>that</i> is gained and sure for ever. And of
+ letters, this makes my 104th and, like Donne's Bride,
+</p>
+<blockquote><blockquote><blockquote><blockquote><blockquote><blockquote><p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; ... I take,<br>
+My jewels from their boxes; call<br>
+My Diamonds, Pearls, and Emeralds, and make<br>
+Myself a constellation of them all!
+</p>
+</blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote>
+<p style="text-indent: 0em">Bless you, my own Beloved!
+</p>
+<p>
+ I am much better to-day&mdash;having been not so well yesterday&mdash;whence the
+ note to you, perhaps! I put that to your charity for construction. By
+ the way, let the foolish and needless story about my whilome friend be
+ of this use, that it records one of the traits in that same generous
+ love, of me, I once mentioned, I remember&mdash;one of the points in his
+ character which, I told you, <i>would</i> account, if you heard them, for
+ my parting company with a good deal of warmth of attachment to myself.
+</p>
+<p>
+ What a day! But you do not so much care for rain, I think. My Mother
+ is no worse, but still suffering sadly.
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">Ever your own, dearest ever&mdash;
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>E.B.B. to R.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Wednesday.<br>
+[Post-mark, January 22, 1846.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ Ever since I ceased to be with you&mdash;ever dearest,&mdash;have been with your
+ 'Luria,' if <i>that</i> is ceasing to be with you&mdash;which it <i>is</i>, I feel at
+ last. Yet the new act is powerful and subtle, and very affecting, it
+ seems to me, after a grave, suggested pathos; the reasoning is done on
+ every hand with admirable directness and adroitness, and poor Luria's
+ iron baptism under such a bright crossing of swords, most miserably
+ complete. Still ... is he to die <i>so</i>? can you mean it? Oh&mdash;indeed I
+ foresaw <i>that</i>&mdash;not a guess of mine ever touched such an end&mdash;and I
+ can scarcely resign myself to it as a necessity, even now ... I mean,
+ to the act, as Luria's act, whether it is final or not&mdash;the act of
+ suicide being so unheroical. But you are a dramatic poet and right
+ perhaps, where, as a didactic poet, you would have been wrong, ...
+ and, after the first shock, I begin to see that your Luria is the man
+ Luria and that his 'sun' lights him so far and not farther than so,
+ and to understand the natural reaction of all that generous trust and
+ hopefulness, what naturally it would be. Also, it is satisfactory that
+ Domizia, having put her woman's part off to the last, should be too
+ late with it&mdash;it will be a righteous retribution. I had fancied that
+ her object was to isolate him, ... to make his military glory and
+ national recompense ring hollowly to his ears, and so commend herself,
+ drawing back the veil.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Puccio's scornful working out of the low work, is very finely given,
+ I think, ... and you have 'a cunning right hand,' to lift up Luria
+ higher in the mind of your readers, by the very means used to pull
+ down his fortunes&mdash;you show what a man he is by the very talk of his
+ rivals ... by his 'natural godship' over Puccio. Then Husain is nobly
+ characteristic&mdash;I like those streaks of Moorish fire in his speeches.
+ 'Why 'twas all fighting' &amp;c. ... <i>that</i> passage perhaps is over-subtle
+ for a Husain&mdash;but too nobly right in the abstract to be altered, if it
+ is so or not. Domizia talks philosophically besides, and how
+ eloquently;&mdash;and very noble she is where she proclaims
+</p>
+<blockquote><blockquote><blockquote><blockquote><blockquote><blockquote><p style="text-indent: 0em">The angel in thee and rejects the sprites<br>
+That ineffectual crowd about his strength,<br>
+And mingle with his work and claim a share!&mdash;
+</p>
+</blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><p style="text-indent: 0em">But why not 'spirits' rather than 'sprites,' which has a different
+ association by custom? 'Spirits' is quite short enough, it seems to
+ me, for a last word&mdash;it sounds like a monosyllable that trembles&mdash;or
+ thrills, rather. And, do you know, I agree with yourself a little when
+ you say (as did you <i>not</i> say?) that some of the speeches&mdash;Domizia's
+ for instance&mdash;are too lengthy. I think I should like them to coil up
+ their strength, here and there, in a few passages. Luria ... poor
+ Luria ... is great and pathetic when he stands alone at last, and 'all
+ his waves have gone over him.' Poor Luria!&mdash;And now, I wonder where
+ Mr. Chorley will look, in this work,&mdash;along all the edges of the
+ hills,&mdash;to find, or prove, his favourite 'mist!' On the glass of his
+ own opera-lorgnon, perhaps:&mdash;shall we ask him to try <i>that</i>?
+</p>
+<p>
+ But first, I want to ask <i>you</i> something&mdash;I have had it in my head a
+ long time, but it might as well have been in a box&mdash;and indeed if it
+ had been in the box with your letters, I should have remembered to
+ speak of it long ago. So now, at last, tell me&mdash;how do you write, O my
+ poet? with steel pens, or Bramah pens, or goose-quills or
+ crow-quills?&mdash;Because I have a penholder which was given to me when I
+ was a child, and which I have used both then and since in the
+ production of various great epics and immortal 'works,' until in these
+ latter years it has seemed to me too heavy, and I have taken into
+ service, instead of it, another two-inch-long instrument which makes
+ Mr. Kenyon laugh to look at&mdash;and so, my fancy has run upon your having
+ the heavier holder, which is not very heavy after all, and which will
+ make you think of me whether you choose it or not, besides being made
+ of a splinter from the ivory gate of old, and therefore not unworthy
+ of a true prophet. Will you have it, dearest? Yes&mdash;because you can't
+ help it. When you come ... on Saturday!&mdash;
+</p>
+<p>
+ And for 'Pauline,' ... I am satisfied with the promise to see it some
+ day ... when we are in the isle of the sirens, or ready for wandering
+ in the Doges' galleries. I seem to understand that you would really
+ rather wish me not to see it now ... and as long as I <i>do</i> see it! So
+ <i>that shall</i> be!&mdash;Am I not good now, and not a teazer? If there is any
+ poetical justice in 'the seven worlds,' I shall have a letter
+ to-night.
+</p>
+<p>
+ By the way, you owe me two letters by your confession. A hundred and
+ four of mine you have, and I, only a hundred and two of yours ...
+ which is a 'deficit' scarcely creditable to me, (now is it?) when,
+ according to the law and ordinance, a woman's hundred and four letters
+ would take two hundred and eight at least, from the other side, to
+ justify them. Well&mdash;I feel inclined to wring out the legal per centage
+ to the uttermost farthing; but fall into a fit of gratitude,
+ notwithstanding, thinking of Monday, and how the second letter came
+ beyond hope. Always better, you are, than I guess you to be,&mdash;and it
+ was being <i>best</i>, to write, as you did, for me to hear twice on one
+ day!&mdash;best and dearest!
+</p>
+<p>
+ But the first letter was not what you feared&mdash;I know you too well not
+ to know how that letter was written and with what intention. <i>Do
+ you</i>, on the other hand, endeavour to comprehend how there may be an
+ eccentricity and obliquity in certain relations and on certain
+ subjects, while the general character stands up worthily of esteem and
+ regard&mdash;even of yours. Mr. Kenyon says broadly that it is
+ monomania&mdash;neither more nor less. Then the principle of passive filial
+ obedience is held&mdash;drawn (and quartered) from Scripture. He <i>sees</i> the
+ law and the gospel on his side. Only the other day, there was a
+ setting forth of the whole doctrine, I hear, down-stairs&mdash;'passive
+ obedience, and particularly in respect to marriage.' One after the
+ other, my brothers all walked out of the room, and there was left for
+ sole auditor, Captain Surtees Cook, who had especial reasons for
+ sitting it out against his will,&mdash;so he sate and asked 'if children
+ were to be considered slaves' as meekly as if he were asking for
+ information. I could not help smiling when I heard of it. He is just
+ <i>succeeding</i> in obtaining what is called an 'adjutancy,' which, with
+ the half pay, will put an end to many anxieties.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Dearest&mdash;when, in the next dream, you meet me in the 'landing-place,'
+ tell me why I am to stand up to be reviewed again. What a fancy,
+ <i>that</i> is of yours, for 'full-lengths'&mdash;and what bad policy, if a
+ fancy, to talk of it so! because you would have had the glory and
+ advantage, and privilege, of seeing me on my feet twenty times before
+ now, if you had not impressed on me, in some ineffable manner, that to
+ stand on my head would scarcely be stranger. Nevertheless you shall
+ have it your own way, as you have everything&mdash;which makes you so very,
+ very, exemplarily submissive, you know!
+</p>
+<p>
+ Mr. Kenyon does not come&mdash;puts it off to <i>Saturday</i> perhaps.
+</p>
+<p>
+ The <i>Daily News</i> I have had a glance at. A weak leading article, I
+ thought ... and nothing stronger from Ireland:&mdash;but enough
+ advertisements to promise a long future. What do you think? or have
+ you not seen the paper? No broad principles laid down. A mere
+ newspaper-support of the 'League.'
+</p>
+<p>
+ May God bless you. Say how you are&mdash;and <i>do</i> walk, and 'care' for
+ yourself,
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">and, so, for your own</p>
+<p style="text-align: right"><i>Ba</i>.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Have I expressed to you at all how 'Luria' impresses <i>me</i> more and
+ more? You shall see the 'remarks' with the other papers&mdash;the details
+ of what strikes me.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>R.B. to E.B.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Thursday Morning.<br>
+[Post-mark, January 22, 1846.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ But you did <i>not</i> get the letter last evening&mdash;no, for all my good
+ intentions&mdash;because somebody came over in the morning and forced me to
+ go out ... and, perhaps, I <i>knew</i> what was coming, and had all my
+ thoughts <i>there</i>, that is, <i>here</i> now, with my own letters from you. I
+ think so&mdash;for this punishment, I will tell you, came for some sin or
+ other last night. I woke&mdash;late, or early&mdash;and, in one of those lucid
+ moments when all things are thoroughly <i>perceived</i>,&mdash;whether suggested
+ by some forgotten passage in the past sleep itself, I don't know&mdash;but
+ I seem to <i>apprehend</i>, comprehend entirely, for the first time, what
+ would happen if I lost you&mdash;the whole sense of that <i>closed door</i> of
+ Catarina's came on me at once, and it was <i>I</i> who said&mdash;not as quoting
+ or adapting another's words, but spontaneously, unavoidably, '<i>In that
+ door, you will not enter, I have</i>'.... And, dearest, the
+</p>
+<p>
+ Unwritten it must remain.
+</p>
+<p>
+ What is on the other leaf, no ill-omen, after all,&mdash;because I
+ strengthened myself against a merely imaginary evil&mdash;as I do always;
+ and <i>thus</i>&mdash;I know I never can lose you,&mdash;you surely are more mine,
+ there is less for the future to give or take away than in the
+ ordinary cases, where so much less is known, explained, possessed, as
+ with us. Understand for me, my dearest&mdash;
+</p>
+<p>
+ And do you think, sweet, that there <i>is</i> any free movement of my soul
+ which your penholder is to secure? Well, try,&mdash;it will be yours by
+ every right of discovery&mdash;and I, for my part, will religiously report
+ to you the first time I think of you 'which, but for your present I
+ should not have done'&mdash;or is it not a happy, most happy way of
+ ensuring a better fifth act to Luria than the foregoing? See the
+ absurdity I write&mdash;when it will be more probably the ruin of the
+ whole&mdash;for was it not observed in the case of a friend of mine once,
+ who wrote his own part in a piece for private theatricals, and had
+ ends of his own to serve in it,&mdash;that he set to work somewhat after
+ this fashion: 'Scene 1st. A breakfast chamber&mdash;Lord and Lady A. at
+ table&mdash;Lady A./ No more coffee my dear?&mdash;Lord A./ One more cup!
+ (<i>Embracing her</i>). Lady A./ I was thinking of trying the ponies in the
+ Park&mdash;are you engaged? Lord A./ Why, there's that bore of a Committee
+ at the House till 2. (<i>Kissing her hand</i>).' And so forth, to the
+ astonishment of the auditory, who did not exactly see the 'sequitur'
+ in either instance. Well, dearest, whatever comes of it, the 'aside,'
+ the bye-play, the digression, will be the best, and only true business
+ of the piece. And though I must smile at your notion of securing
+ <i>that</i> by any fresh appliance, mechanical or spiritual, yet I do thank
+ you, dearest, thank you from my heart indeed&mdash;(and I write with
+ Bramahs <i>always</i>&mdash;not being able to make a pen!)
+</p>
+<p>
+ If you have gone so far with 'Luria,' I fancy myself nearly or
+ altogether safe. I must not tell you, but I wished just these feelings
+ to be in your mind about Domizia, and the death of Luria: the last act
+ throws light back on all, I hope. Observe only, that Luria <i>would</i>
+ stand, if I have plied him effectually with adverse influences, in
+ such a position as to render any other end impossible without the hurt
+ to Florence which his religion is, to avoid inflicting&mdash;passively
+ awaiting, for instance, the sentence and punishment to come at night,
+ would as surely inflict it as taking part with her foes. His aim is to
+ prevent the harm she will do herself by striking him, so he moves
+ aside from the blow. But I know there is very much to improve and
+ heighten in this fourth act, as in the others&mdash;but the right aspect of
+ things seems obtained and the rest of the work is plain and easy.
+</p>
+<p>
+ I am obliged to leave off&mdash;the rest to-morrow&mdash;and then dear,
+ Saturday! I love you utterly, my own best, dearest&mdash;
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>E.B.B. to R.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Thursday Night.<br>
+[Post-mark, January 23, 1846.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ Yes, I understand your 'Luria'&mdash;and there is to be more light; and I
+ open the window to the east and wait for it&mdash;a little less gladly than
+ for <i>you</i> on Saturday, dearest. In the meanwhile you have 'lucid
+ moments,' and 'strengthen' yourself into the wisdom of learning to
+ love me&mdash;and, upon consideration, it does not seem to be so hard after
+ all ... there is 'less for the future to take away' than you had
+ supposed&mdash;so <i>that</i> is the way? Ah, 'these lucid moments, in which all
+ things are thoroughly <i>perceived</i>';&mdash;what harm they do me!&mdash;And I am
+ to 'understand for you,' you say!&mdash;Am I?
+</p>
+<p>
+ On the other side, and to make the good omen complete, I remembered,
+ after I had sealed my last letter, having made a confusion between the
+ ivory and horn gates, the gates of false and true visions, as I am apt
+ to do&mdash;and my penholder belongs to the ivory gate, ... as you will
+ perceive in your lucid moments&mdash;poor holder! But, as you forget me on
+ Wednesdays, the post testifying, ... the sinecure may not be quite so
+ certain as the Thursday's letter says. And <i>I</i> too, in the meanwhile,
+ grow wiser, ... having learnt something which you cannot do,&mdash;you of
+ the 'Bells and Pomegranates': <i>You cannot make a pen.</i> Yesterday I
+ looked round the world in vain for it.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Mr. Kenyon does not come&mdash;<i>will</i> not perhaps until Saturday! Which
+ reminds me&mdash;Mr. Kenyon told me about a year ago that he had been
+ painfully employed that morning in <i>parting</i> two&mdash;dearer than
+ friends&mdash;and he had done it he said, by proving to either, that he or
+ she was likely to mar the prospects of the other. 'If I had spoken to
+ each, of himself or herself,' he said, 'I <i>never could have done it</i>.'
+</p>
+<p>
+ Was not <i>that</i> an ingenious cruelty? The remembrance rose up in me
+ like a ghost, and made me ask you once to promise what you promised
+ ... (you recollect?) because I could not bear to be stabbed with my
+ own dagger by the hand of a third person ... <i>so</i>! When people have
+ lucid moments themselves, you know, it is different.
+</p>
+<p>
+ And <i>shall</i> I indeed have a letter to-morrow? Or, not having the
+ penholder yet, will you....
+</p>
+<p>
+ Goodnight. May God bless you&mdash;
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">Ever and wholly your</p>
+<p style="text-align: right"><SPAN class="sc-ex">Ba</span>.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>R.B. to E.B.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">[Post-mark, January 23, 1846.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ Now, of all perverse interpretations that ever were and never ought to
+ have been, commend me to this of Ba's&mdash;after I bade her generosity
+ 'understand me,' too!&mdash;which meant, 'let her pick out of my disjointed
+ sentences a general meaning, if she can,&mdash;which I very well know their
+ imperfect utterance would not give to one unsupplied with the key of
+ my whole heart's-mystery'&mdash;and Ba, with the key in her hand, to
+ pretend and poke feathers and penholders into the key-hole, and
+ complain that the wards are wrong! So&mdash;when the poor scholar, one has
+ read of, uses not very dissimilar language and argument&mdash;who being
+ threatened with the deprivation of his Virgil learnt the Æneid by
+ heart and then said 'Take what you can now'!&mdash;<i>that</i> Ba calls
+ 'feeling the loss would not be so hard after all'!&mdash;<i>I</i> do not, at
+ least. And if at any future moment I should again be visited&mdash;as I
+ earnestly desire may never be the case&mdash;with a sudden consciousness of
+ the entire inutility of all earthly love (since of <i>my</i> love) to hold
+ its object back from the decree of God, if such should call it away;
+ one of those known facts which, for practical good, we treat as
+ supremely common-place, but which, like those of the uncertainty of
+ life&mdash;the very existence of God, I may say&mdash;if they were <i>not</i>
+ common-place, and could they be thoroughly apprehended (except in the
+ chance minutes which make one grow old, not the mere years)&mdash;the
+ business of the world would cease; but when you find Chaucer's graver
+ at his work of 'graving smale seles' by the sun's light, you know that
+ the sun's self could not have been <i>created</i> on that day&mdash;do you
+ 'understand' that, Ba? And when I am with you, or here or writing or
+ walking&mdash;and perfectly happy in the sunshine of you, I very well know
+ I am no wiser than is good for me and that there seems no harm in
+ feeling it impossible this should change, or fail to go on increasing
+ till this world ends and we are safe, I with you, for ever. But
+ when&mdash;if only <i>once</i>, as I told you, recording it for its very
+ strangeness, I <i>do</i> feel&mdash;in a flash&mdash;that words are words, and could
+ not alter <i>that</i> decree ... will you tell me how, after all, that
+ conviction and the true woe of it are better met than by the as
+ thorough conviction that, for one blessing, the extreme woe is
+ <i>impossible</i> now&mdash;that you <i>are</i>, and have been, <i>mine</i>, and <i>me</i>&mdash;one
+ with me, never to be parted&mdash;so that the complete separation not being
+ to be thought of, such an incomplete one as is yet in Fate's power may
+ be the less likely to attract her notice? And, dearest, in all
+ emergencies, see, I go to you for help; for your gift of better
+ comfort than is found in myself. Or ought I, if I could, to add one
+ more proof to the Greek proverb 'that the half is greater than the
+ whole'&mdash;and only love you for myself (it is absurd; but if I <i>could</i>
+ disentwine you from my soul in that sense), only see my own will, and
+ good (not in <i>your</i> will and good, as I now see them and shall ever
+ see) ... should you say I <i>did</i> love you then? Perhaps. And it would
+ have been better for me, I know&mdash;I should not have <i>written</i> this or
+ the like&mdash;there being no post in the Siren's isle, as you will see.
+</p>
+<p>
+ And the end of the whole matter is&mdash;what? Not by any means what my Ba
+ expects or ought to expect; that I say with a flounce 'Catch me
+ blotting down on paper, again, the first vague impressions in the
+ weakest words and being sure I have only to bid her
+ "understand"!&mdash;when I can get "Blair on Rhetoric," and the additional
+ chapter on the proper conduct of a letter'! On the contrary I tell
+ you, Ba, my own heart's dearest, I will provoke you tenfold worse;
+ will tell you all that comes uppermost, and what frightens me or
+ reassures me, in moments lucid or opaque&mdash;and when all the pen-stumps
+ and holders refuse to open the lock, out will come the key perforce;
+ and once put that knowledge&mdash;of the entire love and worship of my
+ heart and soul&mdash;to its proper use, and all will be clear&mdash;tell me
+ to-morrow that it will be clear when I call you to account and exact
+ strict payment for every word and phrase and full-stop and partial
+ stop, and no stop at all, in this wicked little note which got so
+ treacherously the kisses and the thankfulness&mdash;written with no
+ penholder that is to belong to me, I hope&mdash;but with the feather,
+ possibly, which Sycorax wiped the dew from, as Caliban remembered when
+ he was angry! All but&mdash;(that is, all was wrong but)&mdash;to be just ...
+ the old, dear, so dear ending which makes my heart beat now as at
+ first ... and so, pays for all! Wherefore, all is right again, is it
+ not? and you are my own priceless Ba, my very own&mdash;and I will have
+ you, if you like that style, and want you, and must have you every day
+ and all day long&mdash;much less see you to-morrow <i>stand</i>&mdash;
+</p>
+<p>
+ ... Now, there breaks down my new spirit&mdash;and, shame or no, I must
+ pray you, in the old way, <i>not</i> to <i>receive me standing</i>&mdash;I should not
+ remain master of myself I do believe!
+</p>
+<p>
+ You have put out of my head all I intended to write&mdash;and now I slowly
+ begin to remember the matters they seem strangely unimportant&mdash;that
+ poor impotency of a Newspaper! No&mdash;nothing of that for the present.
+ To-morrow my dearest! Ba's first comment&mdash;'<i>To-morrow?</i> <i>To-day</i> is
+ too soon, it seems&mdash;yet it is wise, perhaps, to avoid the satiety &amp;c.
+ &amp;c. &amp;c. &amp;c. &amp;c.'
+</p>
+<p>
+ Does she feel how I kissed that comment back on her dear self as fit
+ punishment?
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>E.B.B. to R.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">[Post-mark, January 26, 1846.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ I must begin by invoking my own stupidity! To forget after all the
+ penholder! I had put it close beside me too on the table, and never
+ once thought of it afterwards from first to last&mdash;just as I should do
+ if I had a common-place book, the memoranda all turning to
+ obliviscenda as by particular contact. So I shall send the holder with
+ Miss Martineau's books which you can read or not as you like ... they
+ have beauty in passages ... but, trained up against the wall of a set
+ design, want room for branching and blossoming, great as her skill is.
+ I like her 'Playfellow' stories twice as well. Do you know <i>them</i>?
+ Written for children, and in such a fine heroic child-spirit as to be
+ too young and too old for nobody. Oh, and I send you besides a most
+ frightful extract from an American magazine sent to me yesterday ...
+ no, the day before ... on the subject of mesmerism&mdash;and you are to
+ understand, if you please, that the Mr. Edgar Poe who stands committed
+ in it, is my dedicator ... whose dedication I forgot, by the way, with
+ the rest&mdash;so, while I am sending, you shall have his poems with his
+ mesmeric experience and decide whether the outrageous compliment to
+ E.B.B. or the experiment on M. Vandeleur [Valdemar] goes furthest to
+ prove him mad. There is poetry in the man, though, now and then, seen
+ between the great gaps of bathos.... 'Politian' will make you
+ laugh&mdash;as the 'Raven' made <i>me</i> laugh, though with something in it
+ which accounts for the hold it took upon people such as Mr. N.P.
+ Willis and his peers&mdash;it was sent to me from <i>four</i> different quarters
+ besides the author himself, before its publication in this form, and
+ when it had only a newspaper life. Some of the other lyrics have power
+ of a less questionable sort. For the author, I do not know him at
+ all&mdash;never heard from him nor wrote to him&mdash;and in my opinion, there
+ is more faculty shown in the account of that horrible mesmeric
+ experience (mad or not mad) than in his poems. Now do read it from the
+ beginning to the end. That '<i>going out</i>' of the hectic, struck me very
+ much ... and the writhing <i>away</i> of the upper lip. Most
+ horrible!&mdash;Then I believe so much of mesmerism, as to give room for
+ the full acting of the story on me ... without absolutely giving full
+ credence to it, understand.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Ever dearest, you could not think me in earnest in that letter? It was
+ because I understood you so perfectly that I felt at liberty for the
+ jesting a little&mdash;for had I not thought of <i>that</i> before, myself, and
+ was I not reproved for speaking of it, when I said that I was content,
+ for my part, even <i>so</i>? Surely you remember&mdash;and I should not have
+ said it if I had not felt with you, felt and known, that 'there is,
+ with us, less for the future to give or take away than in the ordinary
+ cases.' So much less! All the happiness I have known has come to me
+ through you, and it is enough to live for or die in&mdash;therefore living
+ or dying I would thank God, and use that word '<i>enough</i>' ... being
+ yours in life and death. And always understanding that if either of us
+ should go, you must let it be this one here who was nearly gone when
+ she knew you, since I could not bear&mdash;
+</p>
+<p>
+ Now see if it is possible to write on this subject, unless one laughs
+ to stop the tears. I was more wise on Friday.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Let me tell you instead of my sister's affairs, which are so publicly
+ talked of in this house that there is no confidence to be broken in
+ respect to them&mdash;yet my brothers only see and hear, and are told
+ nothing, to keep them as clear as possible from responsibility. I may
+ say of Henrietta that her only fault is, her virtues being written in
+ water&mdash;I know not of one other fault. She has too much softness to be
+ able to say 'no' in the right place&mdash;and thus, without the slightest
+ levity ... perfectly blameless in that respect, ... she says half a
+ yes or a quarter of a yes, or a yes in some sort of form, too
+ often&mdash;but I will tell you. Two years ago, three men were loving her,
+ as they called it. After a few months, and the proper quantity of
+ interpretations, one of them consoled himself by giving nick-names to
+ his rivals. Perseverance and Despair he called them, and so, went up
+ to the boxes to see out the rest of the play. Despair ran to a crisis,
+ was rejected in so many words, but appealed against the judgment and
+ had his claim admitted&mdash;it was all silence and mildness on each side
+ ... a tacit gaining of ground,&mdash;Despair 'was at least a gentleman,'
+ said my brothers. On which Perseverance came on with violent
+ re-iterations,&mdash;insisted that she loved him without knowing it, or
+ <i>should</i>&mdash;elbowed poor Despair into the open streets, who being a
+ gentleman wouldn't elbow again&mdash;swore that 'if she married another he
+ would wait till she became a widow, trusting to Providence' ... <i>did</i>
+ wait every morning till the head of the house was out, and sate day by
+ day, in spite of the disinclination of my sisters and the rudeness of
+ all my brothers, four hours in the drawing-room ... let himself be
+ refused once a week and sate all the longer ... allowed everybody in
+ the house (and a few visitors) to see and hear him in fits of
+ hysterical sobbing, and sate on unabashed, the end being that he sits
+ now sole regnant, my poor sister saying softly, with a few tears of
+ remorse for her own instability, that she is 'taken by storm and
+ cannot help it.' I give you only the <i>résumé</i> of this military
+ movement&mdash;and though I seem to smile, which it was impossible to avoid
+ at some points of the evidence as I heard it from first one person and
+ then another, yet I am woman enough rather to be glad that the
+ decision is made <i>so</i>. He is sincerely attached to her, I believe; and
+ the want of refinement and sensibility (for he understood her
+ affections to be engaged to another at one time) is covered in a
+ measure by the earnestness,&mdash;and justified too by the event&mdash;everybody
+ being quite happy and contented, even to Despair, who has a new horse
+ and takes lessons in music.
+</p>
+<p>
+ That's love&mdash;is it not? And that's my answer (if you look for it) to
+ the question you asked me yesterday.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Yet do not think that I am turning it all to game. I could not do so
+ with any real earnest sentiment ... I never could ... and now least,
+ and with my own sister whom I love so. One may smile to oneself and
+ yet wish another well&mdash;and so I smile to <i>you</i>&mdash;and it is all safe
+ with you I know. He is a second or third cousin of ours and has golden
+ opinions from all his friends and fellow-officers&mdash;and for the rest,
+ most of these men are like one another.... I never could see the
+ difference between fuller's earth and common clay, among them all.
+</p>
+<p>
+ What do you think he has said since&mdash;to <i>her</i> too?&mdash;'I always
+ persevere about everything. Once I began to write a farce&mdash;which they
+ told me was as bad as could be. Well!&mdash;I persevered!&mdash;<i>I finished
+ it</i>.' Perfectly unconscious, both he and she were of there being
+ anything mal à propos in <i>that</i>&mdash;and no kind of harm was meant,&mdash;only
+ it expresses the man.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Dearest&mdash;it had better be Thursday I think&mdash;<i>our</i> day! I was showing
+ to-day your father's drawings,&mdash;and my brothers, and Arabel besides,
+ admired them very much on the right grounds. Say how you are. You did
+ not seem to me to answer frankly this time, and I was more than half
+ uneasy when you went away. Take exercise, dear, dearest ... think of
+ me enough for it,&mdash;and do not hurry 'Luria.' May God bless you!
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">Your own</p>
+<p style="text-align: right"><i>Ba.</i>
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>R.B. to E.B.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Sunday Evening.<br>
+[Post-mark, January 26, 1846.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ I will not try and write much to-night, dearest, for my head gives a
+ little warning&mdash;and I have so much to think of!&mdash;spite of my penholder
+ being kept back from me after all! Now, ought I to have asked for it?
+ Or did I not seem grateful enough at the promise? This last would be a
+ characteristic reason, seeing that I reproached myself with feeling
+ <i>too</i> grateful for the 'special symbol'&mdash;the 'essential meaning' of
+ which was already in my soul. Well then, I will&mdash;I do pray for
+ it&mdash;next time; and I will keep it for that one yesterday and all its
+ memories&mdash;and it shall bear witness against me, if, on the Siren's
+ isle, I grow forgetful of Wimpole Street. And when is 'next time' to
+ be&mdash;Wednesday or Thursday? When I look back on the strangely steady
+ widening of my horizon&mdash;how no least interruption has occurred to
+ visits or letters&mdash;oh, care <i>you</i>, sweet&mdash;care for us both!
+</p>
+<p>
+ That remark of your sister's delights me&mdash;you remember?&mdash;that the
+ anger would not be so formidable. I have exactly the fear of
+ encountering <i>that</i>, which the sense of having to deal with a ghost
+ would induce: there's no striking at it with one's partizan. Well, God
+ is above all! It is not my fault if it so happens that by returning my
+ love you make me exquisitely blessed; I believe&mdash;more than hope, I am
+ <i>sure</i> I should do all I ever <i>now</i> can do, if you were never to know
+ it&mdash;that is, my love for you was in the first instance its own
+ reward&mdash;if one must use such phrases&mdash;and if it were possible for
+ that ... not <i>anger</i>, which is of no good, but that <i>opposition</i>&mdash;that
+ adverse will&mdash;to show that your good would be attained by the&mdash;
+</p>
+<p>
+ But it would need to be <i>shown</i> to me. You have said thus to me&mdash;in
+ the very last letter, indeed. But with me, or any <i>man</i>, the instincts
+ of happiness develop themselves too unmistakably where there is
+ anything like a freedom of will. The man whose heart is set on being
+ rich or influential after the worldly fashion, may be found far enough
+ from the attainment of either riches or influence&mdash;but he will be in
+ the presumed way to them&mdash;pumping at the pump, if he is really anxious
+ for water, even though the pump be dry&mdash;but not sitting still by the
+ dusty roadside.
+</p>
+<p>
+ I believe&mdash;first of all, you&mdash;but when that is done, and I am allowed
+ to call your heart <i>mine</i>,&mdash;I cannot think you would be happy if
+ parted from me&mdash;and <i>that</i> belief, coming to add to my own feeling in
+ <i>that</i> case. So, this will <i>be</i>&mdash;I trust in God.
+</p>
+<p>
+ In life, in death, I am your own, <i>my</i> own! My head has got well
+ already! It is so slight a thing, that I make such an ado about! Do
+ not reply to these bodings&mdash;they are gone&mdash;they seem absurd! All steps
+ secured but the last, and that last the easiest! Yes&mdash;far easiest! For
+ first you had to be created, only that; and then, in my time; and
+ then, not in Timbuctoo but Wimpole Street, and then ... the strange
+ hedge round the sleeping Palace keeping the world off&mdash;and then ...
+ all was to begin, all the difficulty only <i>begin</i>:&mdash;and now ... see
+ where is reached! And I kiss you, and bless you, my dearest, in
+ earnest of the end!
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>E.B.B. to R.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Monday.<br>
+[Post-mark, January 27, 1846.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ You have had my letter and heard about the penholder. Your fancy of
+ 'not seeming grateful enough,' is not wise enough for <i>you</i>, dearest;
+ when you know that <i>I</i> know your common fault to be the undue
+ magnifying of everything that comes from me, and I am always
+ complaining of it outwardly and inwardly. That suddenly I should set
+ about desiring you to be more grateful,&mdash;even for so great a boon as
+ an old penholder,&mdash;would be a more astounding change than any to be
+ sought or seen in a prime minister.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Another mistake you made concerning Henrietta and her opinion&mdash;and
+ there's no use nor comfort in leaving you in it. Henrietta says that
+ the 'anger would not be so formidable after all'! Poor dearest
+ Henrietta, who trembles at the least bending of the brows ... who has
+ less courage than I, and the same views of the future! What she
+ referred to, was simply the infrequency of the visits. 'Why was I
+ afraid,' she said&mdash;'where was the danger? who would be the
+ <i>informer</i>?'&mdash;Well! I will not say any more. It is just natural that
+ you, in your circumstances and associations, should be unable to see
+ what I have seen from the beginning&mdash;only you will not hereafter
+ reproach me, in the most secret of your thoughts, for not having told
+ you plainly. If I could have told you with greater plainness I should
+ blame myself (and I do not) because it is not an opinion I have, but a
+ perception. I see, I know. The result ... the end of all ... perhaps
+ now and then I see <i>that</i> too ... in the 'lucid moments' which are not
+ the happiest for anybody. Remember, in all cases, that I shall not
+ repent of any part of our past intercourse; and that, therefore, when
+ the time for decision comes, you will be free to look at the question
+ as if you saw it then for the first moment, without being hampered by
+ considerations about 'all those yesterdays.'
+</p>
+<p>
+ For <i>him</i> ... he would rather see me dead at his foot than yield the
+ point: and he will say so, and mean it, and persist in the meaning.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Do you ever wonder at me ... that I should write such things, and have
+ written others so different? <i>I have thought that in myself very
+ often.</i> Insincerity and injustice may seem the two ends, while I
+ occupy the straight betwixt two&mdash;and I should not like you to doubt
+ how this may be! Sometimes I have begun to show you the truth, and
+ torn the paper; I <i>could</i> not. Yet now again I am borne on to tell
+ you, ... to save you from some thoughts which you cannot help perhaps.
+</p>
+<p>
+ There has been no insincerity&mdash;nor is there injustice. I believe, I am
+ certain, I have loved him better than the rest of his children. I have
+ heard the fountain within the rock, and my heart has struggled in
+ towards him through the stones of the rock ... thrust off ... dropping
+ off ... turning in again and clinging! Knowing what is excellent in
+ him well, loving him as my only parent left, and for himself dearly,
+ notwithstanding that hardness and the miserable 'system' which made
+ him appear harder still, I have loved him and been proud of him for
+ his high qualities, for his courage and fortitude when he bore up so
+ bravely years ago under the worldly reverses which he yet felt
+ acutely&mdash;more than you and I could feel them&mdash;but the fortitude was
+ admirable. Then came the trials of love&mdash;then, I was repulsed too
+ often, ... made to suffer in the suffering of those by my side ...
+ depressed by petty daily sadnesses and terrors, from which it is
+ possible however for an elastic affection to rise again as past. Yet
+ my friends used to say 'You look broken-spirited'&mdash;and it was true. In
+ the midst, came my illness,&mdash;and when I was ill he grew gentler and
+ let me draw nearer than ever I had done: and after that great stroke
+ ... you <i>know</i> ... though <i>that</i> fell in the middle of a storm of
+ emotion and sympathy on my part, which drove clearly against him, God
+ seemed to strike our hearts together by the shock; and I was grateful
+ to him for not saying aloud what I said to myself in my agony, '<i>If it
+ had not been for you</i>'...! And comparing my self-reproach to what I
+ imagined his self-reproach must certainly be (for if <i>I</i> had loved
+ selfishly, <i>he</i> had not been kind), I felt as if I could love and
+ forgive him for two ... (I knowing that serene generous departed
+ spirit, and seeming left to represent it) ... and I did love him
+ better than all those left to <i>me</i> to love in the world here. I proved
+ a little my affection for him, by coming to London at the risk of my
+ life rather than diminish the comfort of his home by keeping a part of
+ my family away from him. And afterwards for long and long he spoke to
+ me kindly and gently, and of me affectionately and with too much
+ praise; and God knows that I had as much joy as I imagined myself
+ capable of again, in the sound of his footstep on the stairs, and of
+ his voice when he prayed in this room; my best hope, as I have told
+ him since, being, to die beneath his eyes. Love is so much to me
+ naturally&mdash;it is, to all women! and it was so much to <i>me</i> to feel
+ sure at last that <i>he</i> loved me&mdash;to forget all blame&mdash;to pull the
+ weeds up from that last illusion of life:&mdash;and this, till the
+ Pisa-business, which threw me off, far as ever, again&mdash;farther than
+ ever&mdash;when George said 'he could not flatter me' and I dared not
+ flatter myself. But do <i>you</i> believe that I never wrote what I did not
+ feel: I never did. And I ask one kindness more ... do not notice what
+ I have written here. Let it pass. We can alter nothing by ever so many
+ words. After all, he is the victim. He isolates himself&mdash;and now and
+ then he feels it ... the cold dead silence all round, which is the
+ effect of an incredible system. If he were not stronger than most men,
+ he could not bear it as he does. With such high qualities too!&mdash;so
+ upright and honourable&mdash;you would esteem him, you would like him, I
+ think. And so ... dearest ... let <i>that</i> be the last word.
+</p>
+<p>
+ I dare say you have asked yourself sometimes, why it was that I never
+ managed to draw you into the house here, so that you might make your
+ own way. Now <i>that</i> is one of the things impossible to me. I have not
+ influence enough for <i>that</i>. George can never invite a friend of his
+ even. Do you see? The people who do come here, come by particular
+ license and association ... Capt. Surtees Cook being one of them.
+ Once ... when I was in high favour too ... I asked for Mr. Kenyon to
+ be invited to dinner&mdash;he an old college friend, and living close by
+ and so affectionate to me always&mdash;I felt that he must be hurt by the
+ neglect, and asked. <i>It was in vain.</i> Now, you see&mdash;
+</p>
+<p>
+ May God bless you always! I wrote all my spirits away in this letter
+ yesterday, and kept it to finish to-day ... being yours every day,
+ glad or sad, ever beloved!&mdash;
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">Your <SPAN class="sc-ex">Ba</span>.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>R.B. to E.B.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Tuesday.<br>
+[Post-mark, January 27, 1846.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ Why will you give me such unnecessary proofs of your goodness? Why not
+ leave the books for me to take away, at all events? No&mdash;you must fold
+ up, and tie round, and seal over, and be at all the pains in the world
+ with those hands I see now. But you only threaten; say you 'shall
+ send'&mdash;as yet, and nothing having come, I do pray you, if not too
+ late, to save me the shame&mdash;add to the gratitude you never can now, I
+ think ... only <i>think</i>, for you are a siren, and I don't know
+ certainly to what your magic may not extend. Thus, in not so important
+ a matter, I should have said, the day before yesterday, that no letter
+ from you could make my heart rise within me, more than of old ...
+ unless it should happen to be of twice the ordinary thickness ... and
+ <i>then</i> there's a fear at first lest the over-running of my dealt-out
+ measure should be just a note of Mr. Kenyon's, for instance! But
+ yesterday the very seal began with 'Ba'&mdash;Now, always seal with that
+ seal my letters, dearest! Do you recollect Donne's pretty lines about
+ seals?
+</p>
+<blockquote><blockquote><blockquote><blockquote><blockquote><blockquote><p style="text-indent: 0em">Quondam fessus Amor loquens Amato,<br>
+Tot et tanta loquens amica, scripsit:<br>
+Tandem et fessa manus dedit Sigillum.
+</p>
+</blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote>
+<p style="text-indent: 0em">And in his own English,
+</p>
+<blockquote><blockquote><blockquote><blockquote><blockquote><blockquote><p style="text-indent: 0em">When love, being weary, made an end<br>
+Of kind expressions to his friend,<br>
+He writ; when hand could write no more,<br>
+He gave the seal&mdash;and so left o'er.
+</p>
+</blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote>
+<p>
+ (By the way, what a mercy that he never noticed the jingle <i>in posse</i>
+ of ending 'expressions' and beginning 'impressions.')
+</p>
+<p>
+ How your account of the actors in the 'Love's Labour Lost' amused me!
+ I rather like, though, the notion of that steady, business-like
+ pursuit of love under difficulties; and the <i>sobbing</i> proves something
+ surely! Serjt. Talfourd says&mdash;is it not he who says it?&mdash;'All tears
+ are not for sorrow.' I should incline to say, from my own feeling,
+ that no tears were. They only express joy in me, or sympathy with
+ joy&mdash;and so is it with you too, I should think.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Understand that I do <i>not</i> disbelieve in Mesmerism&mdash;I only object to
+ insufficient evidence being put forward as quite irrefragable. I keep
+ an open sense on the subject&mdash;ready to be instructed; and should have
+ refused such testimony as Miss Martineau's if it had been adduced in
+ support of something I firmly believed&mdash;'non <i>tali</i> auxilio'&mdash;indeed,
+ so has truth been harmed, and only so, from the beginning. So, I shall
+ read what you bid me, and learn all I can.
+</p>
+<p>
+ I am not quite so well this week&mdash;yesterday some friends came early
+ and kept me at home&mdash;for which I seem to suffer a little; less,
+ already, than in the morning&mdash;so I will go out and walk away the
+ whirring ... which is all the mighty ailment. As for 'Luria' I have
+ not looked at it since I saw you&mdash;which means, saw you in the body,
+ because last night I saw you; as I wonder if you know!
+</p>
+<p>
+ Thursday, and again I am with you&mdash;and you will forget nothing ... how
+ the farewell is to be returned? Ah, my dearest, sweetest Ba; how
+ entirely I love you!
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">May God bless you ever&mdash;</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">R.
+</p>
+<p>
+ 2. p.m. Your parcel arrives ... the penholder; now what shall I say?
+ How am I to use so fine a thing even in writing to you? I will give it
+ you again in our Isle, and meantime keep it where my other treasures
+ are&mdash;my letters and my dear ringlet.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Thank you&mdash;all I can thank.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>R.B. to E.B.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Wednesday.<br>
+[Post-mark, January 28, 1846.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ Ever dearest&mdash;I will say, as you desire, nothing on that subject&mdash;but
+ this strictly for myself: you engaged me to consult my own good in the
+ keeping or breaking our engagement; not <i>your</i> good as it might even
+ seem to me; much less seem to another. My only good in this
+ world&mdash;that against which all the world goes for nothing&mdash;is to spend
+ my life with you, and be yours. You know that when I <i>claim</i> anything,
+ it is really yourself in me&mdash;you <i>give</i> me a right and bid me use it,
+ and I, in fact, am most obeying you when I appear most exacting on my
+ own account&mdash;so, in that feeling, I dare claim, once for all, and in
+ all possible cases (except that dreadful one of your becoming worse
+ again ... in which case I wait till life ends with both of us), I
+ claim your promise's fulfilment&mdash;say, at the summer's end: it cannot
+ be for your good that this state of things should continue. We can go
+ to Italy for a year or two and be happy as day and night are long. For
+ me, I adore you. This is all unnecessary, I feel as I write: but you
+ will think of the main fact as <i>ordained</i>, granted by God, will you
+ not, dearest?&mdash;so, not to be put in doubt <i>ever again</i>&mdash;then, we can
+ go quietly thinking of after matters. Till to-morrow, and ever after,
+ God bless my heart's own, own Ba. All my soul follows you,
+ love&mdash;encircles you&mdash;and I live in being yours.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>E.B.B. to R.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Friday Morning.<br>
+[Post-mark, January 31, 1846.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ Let it be this way, ever dearest. If in the time of fine weather, I am
+ not ill, ... <i>then</i> ... <i>not now</i> ... you shall decide, and your
+ decision shall be duty and desire to me, both&mdash;I will make no
+ difficulties. Remember, in the meanwhile, that I <i>have</i> decided to let
+ it be as you shall choose ... <i>shall</i> choose. That I love you enough
+ to give you up 'for your good,' is proof (to myself at least) that I
+ love you enough for any other end:&mdash;but you thought <i>too much of me in
+ the last letter</i>. Do not mistake me. I believe and trust in all your
+ words&mdash;only you are generous unawares, as other men are selfish.
+</p>
+<p>
+ More, I meant to say of this; but you moved me as usual yesterday into
+ the sunshine, and then I am dazzled and cannot see clearly. Still I
+ see that you love me and that I am bound to you:&mdash;and 'what more need
+ I see,' you may ask; while I cannot help looking out to the future, to
+ the blue ridges of the hills, to the <i>chances</i> of your being happy
+ with me. Well! I am yours as <i>you</i> see ... and not yours to teaze you.
+ You shall decide everything when the time comes for doing anything ...
+ and from this to then, I do not, dearest, expect you to use 'the
+ liberty of leaping out of the window,' unless you are sure of the
+ house being on fire! Nobody shall push you out of the window&mdash;least of
+ all, <i>I</i>.
+</p>
+<p>
+ For Italy ... you are right. We should be nearer the sun, as you say,
+ and further from the world, as I think&mdash;out of hearing of the great
+ storm of gossiping, when 'scirocco is loose.' Even if you liked to
+ live altogether abroad, coming to England at intervals, it would be no
+ sacrifice for me&mdash;and whether in Italy or England, we should have
+ sufficient or more than sufficient means of living, without modifying
+ by a line that 'good free life' of yours which you reasonably
+ praise&mdash;which, if it had been necessary to modify, <i>we must have
+ parted</i>, ... because I could not have borne to see you do it; though,
+ that you once offered it for my sake, I never shall forget.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Mr. Kenyon stayed half an hour, and asked, after you went, if you had
+ been here long. I reproached him with what they had been doing at his
+ club (the Athenæum) in blackballing Douglas Jerrold, for want of
+ something better to say&mdash;and he had not heard of it. There were more
+ black than white balls, and Dickens was so enraged at the repulse of
+ his friend that he gave in his own resignation like a privy
+ councillor.
+</p>
+<p>
+ But the really bad news is of poor Tennyson&mdash;I forgot to tell you&mdash;I
+ forget everything. He is seriously ill with an internal complaint and
+ confined to his bed, as George heard from a common friend. Which does
+ not prevent his writing a new poem&mdash;he has finished the second book of
+ it&mdash;and it is in blank verse and a fairy tale, and called the
+ 'University,' the university-members being all females. If George has
+ not diluted the scheme of it with some law from the Inner Temple, I
+ don't know what to think&mdash;it makes me open my eyes. Now isn't the
+ world too old and fond of steam, for blank verse poems, in ever so
+ many books, to be written on the fairies? I hope they may cure him,
+ for the best deed they can do. He is not precisely in danger,
+ understand&mdash;but the complaint may <i>run</i> into danger&mdash;so the account
+ went.
+</p>
+<p>
+ And you? how are you? Mind to tell me. May God bless you. Is Monday or
+ Tuesday to be <i>our</i> day? If it were not for Mr. Kenyon I should take
+ courage and say Monday&mdash;but Tuesday and Saturday would do as
+ well&mdash;would they not?
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">Your own</p>
+<p style="text-align: right"><SPAN class="sc-ex">Ba</span>.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Shall I have a letter?
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>R.B. to E.B.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Saturday.<br>
+[Post-mark, January 31, 1846.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ It is a relief to me this time to obey your wish, and reserve further
+ remark on <i>that</i> subject till by and bye. And, whereas some people, I
+ suppose, have to lash themselves up to the due point of passion, and
+ choose the happy minutes to be as loving in as they possibly can ...
+ (that is, in <i>expression</i>; the just correspondency of word to fact and
+ feeling: for <i>it</i>&mdash;the love&mdash;may be very truly <i>there</i>, at the bottom,
+ when it is got at, and spoken out)&mdash;quite otherwise, I do really have
+ to guard my tongue and set a watch on my pen ... that so I may say as
+ little as can well be likely to be excepted to by your generosity.
+ Dearest, <i>love</i> means <i>love</i>, certainly, and adoration carries its
+ sense with it&mdash;and <i>so</i>, you may have received my feeling in that
+ shape&mdash;but when I begin to hint at the merest putting into practice
+ one or the other profession, you 'fly out'&mdash;instead of keeping your
+ throne. So let this letter lie awhile, till my heart is more used to
+ it, and after some days or weeks I will find as cold and quiet a
+ moment as I can, and by standing as far off you as I shall be able,
+ see more&mdash;'si <i>minus propè</i> stes, te capiet magis.' Meanwhile, silent
+ or speaking, I am yours to dispose of as that <i>glove</i>&mdash;not that hand.
+</p>
+<p>
+ I must think that Mr. Kenyon sees, and knows, and ... in his goodness
+ ... hardly disapproves&mdash;he knows I could not avoid&mdash;escape you&mdash;for he
+ knows, in a manner, what you are ... like your American; and, early in
+ our intercourse, he asked me (did I tell you?) 'what I thought of his
+ young relative'&mdash;and I considered half a second to this effect&mdash;'if he
+ asked me what I thought of the Queen-diamond they showed me in the
+ crown of the Czar&mdash;and I answered truly&mdash;he would not return; "then of
+ course you mean to try and get it to keep."' So I <i>did</i> tell the truth
+ in a very few words. Well, it is no matter.
+</p>
+<p>
+ I am sorry to hear of poor Tennyson's condition. The projected
+ book&mdash;title, scheme, all of it,&mdash;<i>that</i> is astounding;&mdash;and fairies?
+ If 'Thorpes and barnes, sheep-pens and dairies&mdash;<i>this</i> maketh that
+ there ben no fairies'&mdash;locomotives and the broad or narrow gauge must
+ keep the very ghosts of them away. But how the fashion of this world
+ passes; the forms its beauty and truth take; if <i>we</i> have the making
+ of such! I went last night, out of pure shame at a broken promise, to
+ hear Miss Cushman and her sister in 'Romeo and Juliet.' The whole play
+ goes ... horribly; 'speak' bids the Poet, and so M. Walladmir
+ [Valdemar] moves his tongue and dispenses with his jaws. Whatever is
+ slightly touched in, indicated, to give relief to something actually
+ insisted upon and drawn boldly ... <i>here</i>, you have it gone over with
+ an unremitting burnt-stick, till it stares black forever! Romeo goes
+ whining about Verona by broad daylight. Yet when a schoolfellow of
+ mine, I remember, began translating in class Virgil after this mode,
+ 'Sic fatur&mdash;so said Æneas; lachrymans&mdash;<i>a-crying</i>' ... our pedagogue
+ turned on him furiously&mdash;'D'ye think Æneas made such a noise&mdash;as <i>you</i>
+ shall, presently?' How easy to conceive a boyish half-melancholy,
+ smiling at itself.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Then <i>Tuesday</i>, and not Monday ... and Saturday will be the nearer
+ afterward. I am singularly well to-day&mdash;head quite quiet&mdash;and
+ yesterday your penholder began its influence and I wrote about half my
+ last act. Writing is nothing, nor praise, nor blame, nor living, nor
+ dying, but you are all my true life; May God bless you ever&mdash;
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">R.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>E.B.B. to R.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Friday Evening.<br>
+[Post-mark, February 2, 1846.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ Something, you said yesterday, made me happy&mdash;'that your liking for me
+ did not come and go'&mdash;do you remember? Because there was a letter,
+ written at a crisis long since, in which you showed yourself awfully,
+ as a burning mountain, and talked of 'making the most of your
+ fire-eyes,' and of having at intervals 'deep black pits of cold
+ water'!&mdash;and the lava of that letter has kept running down into my
+ thoughts of you too much, until quite of late&mdash;while even yesterday I
+ was not too well instructed to be 'happy,' you see! Do not reproach
+ me! I would not have 'heard your enemy say so'&mdash;it was your own word!
+ And the other long word <i>idiosyncrasy</i> seemed long enough to cover it;
+ and it might have been a matter of temperament, I fancied, that a man
+ of genius, in the mystery of his nature, should find his feelings
+ sometimes like dumb notes in a piano ... should care for people at
+ half past eleven on Tuesday, and on Wednesday at noon prefer a black
+ beetle. How you frightened me with your 'fire-eyes'! 'making the most
+ of them' too! and the 'black pits,' which gaped ... <i>where</i> did they
+ gape? who could tell? Oh&mdash;but lately I have not been crossed so, of
+ course, with those fabulous terrors&mdash;lately that horror of the burning
+ mountain has grown more like a superstition than a rational fear!&mdash;and
+ if I was glad ... happy ... yesterday, it was but as a tolerably
+ sensible nervous man might be glad of a clearer moonlight, showing him
+ that what he had half shuddered at for a sheeted ghoule, was only a
+ white horse on the moor. Such a great white horse!&mdash;call it the
+ 'mammoth horse'&mdash;the '<i>real</i> mammoth,' this time!
+</p>
+<p>
+ Dearest, did I write you a cold letter the last time? Almost it seems
+ so to me! the reason being that my feelings were near to overflow, and
+ that I had to hold the cup straight to prevent the possible dropping
+ on your purple underneath. <i>Your</i> letter, the letter I answered, was
+ in my heart ... <i>is</i> in my heart&mdash;and all the yeses in the world would
+ not be too many for such a letter, as I felt and feel. Also, perhaps,
+ I gave you, at last, a merely formal distinction&mdash;and it comes to the
+ same thing practically without any doubt! but I shrank, with a sort of
+ instinct, from appearing (to myself, mind) to take a security from
+ your words now (said too on an obvious impulse) for what should,
+ would, <i>must</i>, depend on your deliberate wishes hereafter. You
+ understand&mdash;you will not accuse me of over-cautiousness and the like.
+ On the contrary, you are all things to me, ... instead of all and
+ better than all! You have fallen like a great luminous blot on the
+ whole leaf of the world ... of life and time ... and I can see nothing
+ beyond you, nor wish to see it. As to all that was evil and sadness to
+ me, I do not feel it any longer&mdash;it may be raining still, but I am in
+ the shelter and can scarcely tell. If you <i>could</i> be <i>too dear</i> to me
+ you would be now&mdash;but you could not&mdash;I do not believe in those
+ supposed excesses of pure affections&mdash;God cannot be too great.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Therefore it is a conditional engagement still&mdash;all the conditions
+ being in your hands, except the necessary one, of my health. And shall
+ I tell you what is 'not to be put in doubt <i>ever</i>'?&mdash;your goodness,
+ <i>that</i> is ... and every tie that binds me to you. 'Ordained, granted
+ by God' it is, that I should owe the only happiness in my life to you,
+ and be contented and grateful (if it were necessary) to stop with it
+ at this present point. Still I <i>do not</i>&mdash;there seems no necessity yet.
+</p>
+<p>
+ May God bless you, ever dearest:&mdash;
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">Your own <SPAN class="sc-ex">Ba</span>.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>E.B.B. to R.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Saturday.<br>
+[In the same envelope with the preceding letter.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ Well I have your letter&mdash;and I send you the postscript to my last one,
+ written yesterday you observe ... and being simply a postscript in
+ some parts of it, <i>so</i> far it is not for an answer. Only I deny the
+ 'flying out'&mdash;perhaps you may do it a little more ... in your moments
+ of starry centrifugal motion.
+</p>
+<p>
+ So you think that dear Mr. Kenyon's opinion of his 'young
+ relative'&mdash;(neither young nor his relative&mdash;not very much of either!)
+ is to the effect that you couldn't possibly 'escape' her&mdash;? It looks
+ like the sign of the Red Dragon, put <i>so</i> ... and your burning
+ mountain is not too awful for the scenery.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Seriously ... gravely ... if it makes me three times happy that you
+ should love me, yet I grow uneasy and even saddened when you say
+ infatuated things such as this and this ... unless after all you mean
+ a philosophical sarcasm on the worth of Czar diamonds. No&mdash;do not say
+ such things! If you do, I shall end by being jealous of some ideal
+ Czarina who must stand between you and me.... I shall think that it is
+ not <i>I</i> whom you look at ... and <i>pour cause</i>. 'Flying out,' <i>that</i>
+ would be!
+</p>
+<p>
+ And for Mr. Kenyon, I only know that I have grown the most ungrateful
+ of human beings lately, and find myself almost glad when he does not
+ come, certainly uncomfortable when he does&mdash;yes, <i>really</i> I would
+ rather not see him at all, and when you are not here. The sense of
+ which and the sorrow for which, turn me to a hypocrite, and make me
+ ask why he does not come &amp;c. ... questions which never came to my lips
+ before ... till I am more and more ashamed and sorry. Will it end, I
+ wonder, by my ceasing to care for any one in the world, except,
+ except...? or is it not rather that I feel trodden down by either his
+ too great penetration or too great unconsciousness, both being
+ overwhelming things from him to me. From a similar cause I hate
+ writing letters to any of my old friends&mdash;I feel as if it were the
+ merest swindling to attempt to give the least account of myself to
+ anybody, and when their letters come and I know that nothing very
+ fatal has happened to them, scarcely I can read to an end afterwards
+ through the besetting care of having to answer it all. Then I am
+ ignoble enough to revenge myself on people for their stupidities ...
+ which never in my life I did before nor felt the temptation to do ...
+ and when they have a distaste for your poetry through want of
+ understanding, I have a distaste for <i>them</i> ... cannot help it&mdash;and
+ you need not say it is wrong, because I know the whole iniquity of it,
+ persisting nevertheless. As for dear Mr. Kenyon&mdash;with whom we began,
+ and who thinks of you as appreciatingly and admiringly as one man can
+ think of another,&mdash;do not imagine that, if he <i>should</i> see anything,
+ he can 'approve' of either your wisdom or my generosity, ... <i>he</i>,
+ with his large organs of caution, and his habit of looking right and
+ left, and round the corner a little way. Because, you know, ... if I
+ should be ill <i>before</i> ... why there, is a conclusion!&mdash;but if
+ <i>afterward</i> ... what? You who talk wildly of my generosity, whereas I
+ only and most impotently tried to be generous, must see how both
+ suppositions have their possibility. Nevertheless you are the master
+ to run the latter risk. You have overcome ... to your loss
+ perhaps&mdash;unless the judgment is revised. As to taking the half of my
+ prison ... I could not even smile at <i>that</i> if it seemed probable ...
+ I should recoil from your affection even under a shape so fatal to you
+ ... dearest! No! There is a better probability before us I hope and
+ believe&mdash;in spite of the <i>possibility</i> which it is impossible to deny.
+ And now we leave this subject for the present.
+</p>
+<p>
+ <i>Sunday.</i>&mdash;You are 'singularly well.' You are very seldom quite well,
+ I am afraid&mdash;yet 'Luria' seems to have done no harm this time, as you
+ are singularly well the day <i>after</i> so much writing. Yet do not hurry
+ that last act.... I won't have it for a long while yet.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Here I have been reading Carlyle upon Cromwell and he is very fine,
+ very much himself, it seems to me, everywhere. Did Mr. Kenyon make you
+ understand that I had said there was nothing in him but <i>manner</i> ... I
+ thought he said so&mdash;and I am confident that he never heard such an
+ opinion from me, for good or for evil, ever at all. I may have
+ observed upon those vulgar attacks on account of the so-called
+ <i>mannerism</i>, the obvious fact, that an individuality, carried into the
+ medium, the expression, is a feature in all men of genius, as Buffon
+ teaches ... 'Le style, c'est <i>l'homme</i>.' But if the <i>whole man</i> were
+ style, if all Carlyleism were manner&mdash;why there would be no man, no
+ Carlyle worth talking of. I wonder that Mr. Kenyon should misrepresent
+ me so. Euphuisms there may be to the end of the world&mdash;affected
+ parlances&mdash;just as a fop at heart may go without shoestrings to mimic
+ the distractions of some great wandering soul&mdash;although <i>that</i> is a
+ bad comparison, seeing that what is called Carlyle's mannerism, is not
+ his dress, but his physiognomy&mdash;or more than <i>that</i> even.
+</p>
+<p>
+ But I do not forgive him for talking here against the 'ideals of
+ poets' ... opposing their ideal by a mis-called <i>reality</i>, which is
+ another sort, a baser sort, of ideal after all. He sees things in
+ broad blazing lights&mdash;but he does not analyse them like a
+ philosopher&mdash;do you think so? Then his praise for dumb heroic action
+ as opposed to speech and singing, what is <i>that</i>&mdash;when all earnest
+ thought, passion, belief, and their utterances, are as much actions
+ surely as the cutting off of fifty heads by one right hand. As if
+ Shakespeare's actions were not greater than Cromwell's!&mdash;
+</p>
+<p>
+ But I shall write no more. Once more, may God bless you.
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">Wholly and only</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">Your <SPAN class="sc-ex">Ba</span>.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>R.B. to E.B.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Tuesday Morning.<br>
+[Post-mark, February 4, 1846.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ You ought hardly,&mdash;ought you, my Ba?&mdash;to refer to <i>that</i> letter or any
+ expression in it; I had&mdash;and <i>have</i>, I trust&mdash;your forgiveness for
+ what I wrote, meaning to be generous or at least just, God knows.
+ That, and the other like exaggerations were there to serve the purpose
+ of what you properly call a <i>crisis</i>. I <i>did</i> believe,&mdash;taking an
+ expression, in the note that occasioned mine, in connection with an
+ excuse which came in the postscript for not seeing me on the day
+ previously appointed, I did fully believe that you were about to deny
+ me admittance again unless I blotted out&mdash;not merely softened
+ down&mdash;the past avowal. All was wrong, foolish, but from a good notion,
+ I dare to say. And then, that particular exaggeration you bring most
+ painfully to my mind&mdash;<i>that</i> does not, after all, disagree with what I
+ said and you repeat&mdash;does it, if you will think? I said my other
+ '<i>likings</i>' (as you rightly set it down) <i>used</i> to 'come and go,' and
+ that my love for you <i>did not</i>, and that is true; the first clause as
+ the last of the sentence, for my sympathies are very wide and
+ general,&mdash;always have been&mdash;and the natural problem has been the
+ giving unity to their object, concentrating them instead of
+ dispersing. I seem to have foretold, <i>foreknown</i> you in other likings
+ of mine&mdash;now here ... when the liking '<i>came</i>' ... and now elsewhere
+ ... when as surely the liking '<i>went</i>': and if they had stayed before
+ the time would that have been a comfort to refer to? On the contrary,
+ I am as little likely to be led by delusions as can be,&mdash;for Romeo
+ <i>thinks</i> he loves Rosaline, and is excused on all hands&mdash;whereas I saw
+ the plain truth without one mistake, and 'looked to like, if looking
+ liking moved&mdash;and no more deep <i>did</i> I endart mine eye'&mdash;about which,
+ first I was very sorry, and after rather proud&mdash;all which I seem to
+ have told you before.&mdash;And now, when my whole heart and soul find you,
+ and fall on you, and fix forever, I am to be dreadfully afraid the joy
+ cannot last, seeing that
+</p>
+<p>
+ &mdash;it is so baseless a fear that no illustration will serve! Is it gone
+ now, dearest, ever-dearest?
+</p>
+<p>
+ And as you amuse me sometimes, as now, by seeming surprised at some
+ chance expression of a truth which is grown a veriest commonplace to
+ <i>me</i>&mdash;like Charles Lamb's 'letter to an elderly man whose education
+ had been neglected'&mdash;when he finds himself involuntarily communicating
+ truths above the capacity and acquirements of his friend, and stops
+ himself after this fashion&mdash;'If you look round the world, my dear
+ Sir&mdash;for it <i>is</i> round!&mdash;so I will make you laugh at me, if you will,
+ for <i>my</i> inordinate delight at hearing the success of your experiment
+ with the opium. I never dared, nor shall dare inquire into your use of
+ that&mdash;for, knowing you utterly as I do, I know you only bend to the
+ most absolute necessity in taking more or less of it&mdash;so that increase
+ of the quantity must mean simply increased weakness, illness&mdash;and
+ diminution, diminished illness. And now there <i>is</i> diminution! Dear,
+ dear Ba&mdash;you speak of my silly head and its ailments ... well, and
+ what brings on the irritation? A wet day or two spent at home; and
+ what ends it all directly?&mdash;just an hour's walk! So with <i>me</i>:
+ now,&mdash;fancy me shut in a room for seven years ... it is&mdash;no, <i>don't</i>
+ see, even in fancy, what is left of me then! But <i>you</i>, at the end;
+ this is <i>all</i> the harm: I wonder ... I confirm my soul in its belief
+ in perpetual miraculousness ... I bless God with my whole heart that
+ it is thus with you! And so, I will not even venture to say&mdash;so
+ superfluous it were, though with my most earnest, most loving breath
+ (I who <i>do</i> love you more at every breath I draw; indeed, yes
+ dearest,)&mdash;I <i>will not</i> bid you&mdash;that is, pray you&mdash;to persevere! You
+ have all my life bound to yours&mdash;save me from <i>my 'seven years'</i>&mdash;and
+ God reward you!
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">Your own R.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>E.B.B. to R.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">[Post-mark, February 5, 1846.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ But I did not&mdash;dear, dearest&mdash;no indeed, I did not mean any harm about
+ the letter. I wanted to show you how you had given me pleasure&mdash;and
+ so,&mdash;did I give you pain? was <i>that</i> my ingenuity? Forgive my
+ unhappiness in it, and let it be as if it had not been. Only I will
+ just say that what made me talk about 'the thorn in the flesh' from
+ that letter so long, was a sort of conviction of your having put into
+ it as much of the truth, <i>your</i> truth, as admitted of the ultimate
+ purpose of it, and not the least, slightest doubt of the key you gave
+ me to the purpose in question. And so forgive me. Why did you set
+ about explaining, as if I were doubting you? When you said once that
+ it 'did not come and go,'&mdash;was it not enough? enough to make me feel
+ happy as I told you? Did I require you to write a letter like this?
+ Now think for a moment, and know once for all, how from the beginning
+ to these latter days and through all possible degrees of crisis, you
+ have been to my apprehension and gratitude, the best, most consistent,
+ most noble ... the words falter that would speak of it all. In nothing
+ and at no moment have you&mdash;I will not say&mdash;failed to <i>me</i>, but spoken
+ or acted unworthily of yourself at the highest. What have you ever
+ been to me except too generous? Ah&mdash;if I had been only half as
+ generous, it is true that I never could have seen you again after that
+ first meeting&mdash;it was the straight path perhaps. But I had not
+ courage&mdash;I shrank from the thought of it&mdash;and then ... besides ... I
+ could not believe that your mistake was likely to last,&mdash;I concluded
+ that I might keep my friend.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Why should any remembrance be painful to <i>you</i>? I do not understand.
+ Unless indeed I should grow painful to you ... I myself!&mdash;seeing that
+ every remembered separate thing has brought me nearer to you, and made
+ me yours with a deeper trust and love.
+</p>
+<p>
+ And for that letter ... do you fancy that in <i>my</i> memory the sting is
+ not gone from it?&mdash;and that I do not carry the thought of it, as the
+ Roman maidens, you speak of, their cool harmless snakes, at my heart
+ always? So let the poor letter be forgiven, for the sake of the dear
+ letter that was burnt, forgiven by <i>you</i>&mdash;until you grow angry with me
+ instead&mdash;just till then.
+</p>
+<p>
+ And that you should care so much about the opium! Then <i>I</i> must care,
+ and get to do with less&mdash;at least. On the other side of your goodness
+ and indulgence (a very little way on the other side) it might strike
+ you as strange that I who have had no pain&mdash;no acute suffering to keep
+ down from its angles&mdash;should need opium in any shape. But I have had
+ restlessness till it made me almost mad: at one time I lost the power
+ of sleeping quite&mdash;and even in the day, the continual aching sense of
+ weakness has been intolerable&mdash;besides palpitation&mdash;as if one's life,
+ instead of giving movement to the body, were imprisoned undiminished
+ within it, and beating and fluttering impotently to get out, at all
+ the doors and windows. So the medical people gave me opium&mdash;a
+ preparation of it, called morphine, and ether&mdash;and ever since I have
+ been calling it my amreeta draught, my elixir,&mdash;because the
+ tranquillizing power has been wonderful. Such a nervous system I
+ have&mdash;so irritable naturally, and so shattered by various causes, that
+ the need has continued in a degree until now, and it would be
+ dangerous to leave off the calming remedy, Mr. Jago says, except very
+ slowly and gradually. But slowly and gradually something may be
+ done&mdash;and you are to understand that I never <i>increased</i> upon the
+ prescribed quantity ... prescribed in the first instance&mdash;no! Now
+ think of my writing all this to you!&mdash;
+</p>
+<p>
+ And after all the lotus-eaters are blessed beyond the opium-eaters;
+ and the best of lotuses are such thoughts as I know.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Dear Miss Mitford comes to-morrow, and I am not glad enough. Shall I
+ have a letter to make me glad? She will talk, talk, talk ... and I
+ shall be hoping all day that not a word may be talked of ... <i>you</i>:&mdash;a
+ forlorn hope indeed! There's a hope for a day like Thursday which is
+ just in the middle between a Tuesday and a Saturday!
+</p>
+<p>
+ Your head ... is it ... <i>how</i> is it? tell me. And consider again if it
+ could be possible that I could ever desire to reproach <i>you</i> ... in
+ what I said about the letter.
+</p>
+<p>
+ May God bless you, best and dearest. If you are the <i>compensation</i>
+ blessed is the evil that fell upon me: and <i>that</i>, I can say before
+ God.
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">Your <SPAN class="sc-ex">Ba</span>.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>R.B. to E.B.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Friday.<br>
+[Post-mark, February 6, 1846.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ If I said you 'gave me pain' in anything, it was in the only way ever
+ possible for you, my dearest&mdash;by giving <i>yourself</i>, in me, pain&mdash;being
+ unjust to your own right and power as I feel them at my heart: and in
+ that way, I see you will go on to the end, I getting called&mdash;in this
+ very letter&mdash;'generous' &amp;c. Well, let me fancy you see very, very deep
+ into future chances and how I should behave on occasion. I shall
+ hardly imitate you, I whose sense of the present and its claims of
+ gratitude already is beyond expression.
+</p>
+<p>
+ All the kind explaining about the opium makes me happier. 'Slowly and
+ gradually' what may <i>not</i> be done? Then see the bright weather while I
+ write&mdash;lilacs, hawthorn, plum-trees all in bud; elders in leaf,
+ rose-bushes with great red shoots; thrushes, whitethroats, hedge
+ sparrows in full song&mdash;there can, let us hope, be nothing worse in
+ store than a sharp wind, a week of it perhaps&mdash;and then comes what
+ shall come&mdash;
+</p>
+<p>
+ And Miss Mitford yesterday&mdash;and has she fresh fears for you of my evil
+ influence and Origenic power of 'raying out darkness' like a swart
+ star? Why, the common sense of the world teaches that there is nothing
+ people at fault in any faculty of expression are so intolerant of as
+ the like infirmity in others&mdash;whether they are unconscious of, or
+ indulgent to their own obscurity and fettered organ, the hindrance
+ from the fettering of their neighbours' is redoubled. A man may think
+ he is not deaf, or, at least, that you need not be so much annoyed by
+ his deafness as you profess&mdash;but he will be quite aware, to say the
+ least of it, when another man can't hear <i>him</i>; he will certainly not
+ encourage him to stop his ears. And so with the converse; a writer who
+ fails to make himself understood, as presumably in my case, may either
+ believe in his heart that it is <i>not</i> so ... that only as much
+ attention and previous instructedness as the case calls for, would
+ quite avail to understand him; or he may open his eyes to the fact and
+ be trying hard to overcome it: but on which supposition is he led to
+ confirm another in his unintelligibility? By the proverbial tenderness
+ of the eye with the mote for the eye with the beam? If that beam were
+ just such another mote&mdash;<i>then</i> one might sympathize and feel no such
+ inconvenience&mdash;but, because I have written a 'Sordello,' do I turn to
+ just its <i>double</i>, Sordello the second, in your books, and so perforce
+ see nothing wrong? 'No'&mdash;it is supposed&mdash;'but something <i>as</i> obscure
+ in its way.' Then down goes the bond of union at once, and I stand no
+ nearer to view your work than the veriest proprietor of one thought
+ and the two words that express it without obscurity at all&mdash;'bricks
+ and mortar.' Of course an artist's whole problem must be, as Carlyle
+ wrote to me, 'the expressing with articulate clearness the thought in
+ him'&mdash;I am almost inclined to say that <i>clear expression</i> should be
+ his only work and care&mdash;for he is born, ordained, such as he is&mdash;and
+ not born learned in putting what was born in him into words&mdash;what ever
+ <i>can</i> be clearly spoken, ought to be. But 'bricks and mortar' is very
+ easily said&mdash;and some of the thoughts in 'Sordello' not so readily
+ even if Miss Mitford were to try her hand on them.
+</p>
+<p>
+ I look forward to a real life's work for us both. <i>I</i> shall do
+ all,&mdash;under your eyes and with your hand in mine,&mdash;all I was intended
+ to do: may but <i>you</i> as surely go perfecting&mdash;by continuing&mdash;the work
+ begun so wonderfully&mdash;'a rose-tree that beareth seven-times seven'&mdash;
+</p>
+<p>
+ I am forced to dine in town to-day with an old friend&mdash;'to-morrow'
+ always begins half the day before, like a Jewish sabbath. Did your
+ sister tell you that I met her on the stairs last time? She did <i>not</i>
+ tell you that I had almost passed by her&mdash;the eyes being still
+ elsewhere and occupied. Now let me write out that&mdash;no&mdash;I will send the
+ old ballad I told you of, for the strange coincidence&mdash;and it is very
+ charming beside, is it not? Now goodbye, my sweetest, dearest&mdash;and
+ tell me good news of yourself to-morrow, and be but half a quarter as
+ glad to see me as I shall be blessed in seeing you. God bless you
+ ever.
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">Your own
+
+R.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>R.B. to E.B.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Saturday Morning.<br>
+[Post-mark, February 7, 1846.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ Dearest, to my sorrow I must, I fear, give up the delight of seeing
+ you this morning. I went out unwell yesterday, and a long noisy dinner
+ with speech-making, with a long tiresome walk at the end of it&mdash;these
+ have given me such a bewildering headache that I really see some
+ reason in what they say here about keeping the house. Will you forgive
+ me&mdash;and let me forget it all on Monday? On <i>Monday</i>&mdash;unless I am told
+ otherwise by the early post&mdash;And God bless you ever
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">Your own&mdash;
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>E.B.B. to R.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Saturday.<br>
+[Post-mark, February 7, 1846.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ I felt it must be so ... that something must be the matter, ... and I
+ had been so really unhappy for half an hour, that your letter which
+ comes now at four, seems a little better, with all its bad news, than
+ my fancies took upon themselves to be, without instruction. Now <i>was</i>
+ it right to go out yesterday when you were unwell, and to a great
+ dinner?&mdash;but I shall not reproach you, dearest, dearest&mdash;I have no
+ heart for it at this moment. As to Monday, of course it is as you like
+ ... if you are well enough on Monday ... if it should be thought wise
+ of you to come to London through the noise ... if ... you understand
+ all the <i>ifs</i> ... and among them the greatest if of all, ... for if
+ you do love me ... <i>care</i> for me even, you will not do yourself harm
+ or run any risk of harm by going out <i>anywhere too soon</i>. On Monday,
+ in case you are <i>considered well enough</i>, and otherwise Tuesday,
+ Wednesday&mdash;I leave it to you. Still I <i>will</i> ask one thing, whether
+ you come on Monday or not. <i>Let</i> me have a single line by the nearest
+ post to say how you are. Perhaps for to-night it is not possible&mdash;oh
+ no, it is nearly five now! but a word written on Sunday would be with
+ me early on Monday morning, and I know you will let me have it, to
+ save some of the anxious thoughts ... to break them in their course
+ with some sort of certainty! May God bless you dearest of all!&mdash;I
+ thought of you on Thursday, but did not speak of you, not even when
+ Miss Mitford called Hood the greatest poet of the age ... she had been
+ depreciating Carlyle, so I let you lie and wait on the same level, ...
+ that shelf of the rock which is above tide mark! I was glad even, that
+ she did not speak of you; and, under cover of her speech of others, I
+ had my thoughts of you deeply and safely. When she had gone at half
+ past six, moreover, I grew over-hopeful, and made up my fancy to have
+ a letter at eight! The branch she had pulled down, sprang upward
+ skyward ... to that high possibility of a letter! Which did not come
+ that day ... no!&mdash;and I revenged myself by writing a letter to <i>you</i>,
+ which was burnt afterwards because I would not torment you for
+ letters. Last night, came a real one&mdash;dearest! So we could not keep
+ our sabbath to-day! It is a fast day instead, ... on my part. How
+ should I feel (I have been thinking to myself), if I did not see you
+ on Saturday, and could not hope to see you on Monday, nor on Tuesday,
+ nor on Wednesday, nor Thursday nor Friday, nor Saturday again&mdash;if all
+ the sabbaths were gone out of the world for me! May God bless you!&mdash;it
+ has grown to be enough prayer!&mdash;as <i>you</i> are enough (and all, besides)
+ for
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">Your own</p>
+<p style="text-align: right"><SPAN class="sc-ex">Ba</span>.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>R.B. to E.B.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">[Post-mark, February 7, 1846.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ The clock strikes&mdash;<i>three</i>; and I am here, not with you&mdash;and my
+ 'fractious' headache at the very worst got suddenly better just now,
+ and is leaving me every minute&mdash;as if to make me aware, with an
+ undivided attention, that at this present you are waiting for me, and
+ soon will be wondering&mdash;and it would be so easy now to dress myself
+ and walk or run or ride&mdash;do anything that led to you ... but by no
+ haste in the world could I reach you, I am forced to see, before a
+ quarter to five&mdash;by which time I think my letter must arrive. Dear,
+ dearest Ba, did you but know how vexed I am&mdash;with myself, with&mdash;this
+ is absurd, of course. The cause of it all was my going out last
+ night&mdash;yet that, neither, was to be helped, the party having been
+ twice put off before&mdash;once solely on my account. And the sun shines,
+ and you would shine&mdash;
+</p>
+<p>
+ Monday is to make all the amends in its power, is it not? Still, still
+ I have lost my day.
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">Bless you, my ever-dearest.</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">Your R.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>R.B. to E.B.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Sunday Morning.<br>
+[Post-mark, February 9, 1846.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ My dearest&mdash;there are no words,&mdash;nor will be to-morrow, nor even in
+ the Island&mdash;I know that! But I do love you.
+</p>
+<p>
+ My arms have been round you for many minutes since the last word&mdash;
+</p>
+<p>
+ I am quite well now&mdash;my other note will have told you when the change
+ began&mdash;I think I took too violent a shower bath, with a notion of
+ getting better in as little time as possible,&mdash;and the stimulus turned
+ mere feverishness to headache. However, it was no sooner gone, in a
+ degree, than a worse plague came. I sate thinking of you&mdash;but I knew
+ my note would arrive at about four o'clock or a little later&mdash;and I
+ thought the visit for the quarter of an hour would as effectually
+ prevent to-morrow's meeting as if the whole two hours' blessing had
+ been laid to heart&mdash;to-morrow I shall see you, Ba&mdash;my sweetest. But
+ there are cold winds blowing to-day&mdash;how do you bear them, my Ba?
+ '<i>Care</i>' you, pray, pray, care for all <i>I</i> care about&mdash;and be well, if
+ God shall please, and bless me as no man ever was blessed! Now I kiss
+ you, and will begin a new thinking of you&mdash;and end, and begin, going
+ round and round in my circle of discovery,&mdash;<i>My</i> lotos-blossom!
+ because they <i>loved</i> the lotos, were lotos-lovers,&mdash;<span title="lôtou t' erôtes">&lambda;&omega;&tau;&omicron;&upsilon; &tau;' &epsilon;&rho;&omega;&tau;&epsilon;&sigmaf;</span>,
+ as Euripides writes in the <span title="Trôades">
+ &Tau;&rho;&omega;&alpha;&delta;&epsilon;&sigmaf;</span>.
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">Your own
+</p>
+<p>
+ P.S. See those lines in the <i>Athenæum</i> on Pulci with Hunt's
+ translation&mdash;all wrong&mdash;'<i>che non si sente</i>,' being&mdash;'that one does
+ not <i>hear</i> him' i.e. the ordinarily noisy fellow&mdash;and the rest, male,
+ pessime! Sic verte, meo periculo, mî ocelle!
+</p>
+<blockquote><blockquote><blockquote><blockquote><blockquote><blockquote><p style="text-indent: 0em">Where's Luigi Pulci, that one don't the man see?<br>
+He just now yonder in the copse has '<i>gone it</i>' (<i>n</i>'andò)<br>
+Because across his mind there came a fancy;<br>
+He'll wish to fancify, perhaps, a sonnet!<br>
+</p>
+</blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><p style="text-indent: 0em">Now Ba thinks nothing can be worse than that? Then read <i>this</i> which I
+ really told Hunt and got his praise for. Poor dear wonderful
+ persecuted Pietro d'Abano wrote this quatrain on the people's plaguing
+ him about his mathematical studies and wanting to burn him&mdash;he helped
+ to build Padua Cathedral, wrote a Treatise on Magic still extant, and
+ passes for a conjuror in his country to this day&mdash;when there is a
+ storm the mothers tell the children that he is in the air; his pact
+ with the evil one obliged him to drink no <i>milk</i>; no natural human
+ food! You know Tieck's novel about him? Well, this quatrain is said, I
+ believe truly, to have been discovered in a well near Padua some fifty
+ years ago.
+</p>
+<blockquote><blockquote><blockquote><blockquote><blockquote><blockquote><p style="text-indent: 0em">Studiando le mie cifre, col compasso<br>
+Rilevo, che presto sarò sotterra&mdash;<br>
+Perchè del mio saper si fa gran chiasso,<br>
+E gl'ignoranti m'hanno mosso guerra.
+</p>
+</blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><p style="text-indent: 0em">Affecting, is it not, in its simple, child like plaining? Now so, if I
+ remember, I turned it&mdash;word for word&mdash;
+</p>
+<blockquote><blockquote><blockquote><blockquote><blockquote><blockquote><p style="text-indent: 0em">Studying my ciphers, with the compass<br>
+I reckon&mdash;who soon shall be below ground,<br>
+Because of my lore they make great 'rumpus,'<br>
+And against me war makes each dull rogue round.
+</p>
+</blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><p style="text-indent: 0em">Say that you forgive me to-morrow!
+</p>
+<p style="text-indent: 0em">[The following is in E.B.B.'s handwriting.]
+</p>
+<blockquote><blockquote><blockquote><blockquote><blockquote><p style="text-indent: 0em">With my compass I take up my ciphers, poor scholar;<br>
+Who myself shall be taken down soon under the ground ...<br>
+Since the world at my learning roars out in its choler,<br>
+And the blockheads have fought me all round.
+</p>
+</blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote>
+<br>
+<h3><i>E.B.B. to R.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Tuesday.<br>
+[Post-mark, February 10, 1846.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ Ever dearest, I have been possessed by your 'Luria' just as you would
+ have me, and I should like you to understand, not simply how fine a
+ conception the whole work seems to me, so developed, but how it has
+ moved and affected me, without the ordinary means and dialect of
+ pathos, by that calm attitude of moral grandeur which it has&mdash;it is
+ very fine. For the execution, <i>that</i> too is worthily done&mdash;although I
+ agree with you, that a little quickening and drawing in closer here
+ and there, especially towards the close where there is no time to
+ lose, the reader feels, would make the effect stronger&mdash;but you will
+ look to it yourself&mdash;and such a conception <i>must</i> come in thunder and
+ lightning, as a chief god would&mdash;<i>must</i> make its own way ... and will
+ not let its poet go until he speaks it out to the ultimate syllable.
+ Domizia disappoints me rather. You might throw a flash more of light
+ on her face&mdash;might you not? But what am I talking? I think it a
+ magnificent work&mdash;a noble exposition of the ingratitude of men against
+ their 'heroes,' and (what is peculiar) an <i>humane</i> exposition ... not
+ misanthropical, after the usual fashion of such things: for the
+ return, the remorse, saves it&mdash;and the 'Too late' of the repentance
+ and compensation covers with its solemn toll the fate of persecutors
+ and victim. We feel that Husain himself could only say afterward ...
+ '<i>That is done.</i>' And now&mdash;surely you think well of the work as a
+ whole? You cannot doubt, I fancy, of the grandeur of it&mdash;and of the
+ <i>subtilty</i> too, for it is subtle&mdash;too subtle perhaps for stage
+ purposes, though as clear, ... as to expression ... as to medium ...
+ as 'bricks and mortar' ... shall I say?
+</p>
+<blockquote><blockquote><blockquote><blockquote><blockquote><blockquote><p style="text-indent: 0em">'A people is but the attempt of many<br>
+To rise to the completer life of one.'
+</p>
+</blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><p style="text-indent: 0em">There is one of the fine thoughts. And how fine <i>he</i> is, your Luria,
+ when he looks back to his East, through the half-pardon and
+ half-disdain of Domizia. Ah&mdash;Domizia! would it hurt her to make her
+ more a woman ... a little ... I wonder!
+</p>
+<p>
+ So I shall begin from the beginning, from the first act, and read
+ <i>through</i> ... since I have read the fifth twice over. And remember,
+ please, that I am to read, besides, the 'Soul's Tragedy,' and that I
+ shall dun you for it presently. Because you told me it was finished,
+ otherwise I would not speak a word, feeling that you want rest, and
+ that I, who am anxious about you, would be crossing my own purposes
+ by driving you into work. It is the overwork, the overwear of mind and
+ heart (for the feelings come as much into use as the thoughts in these
+ productions), that makes you so pale, dearest, that distracts your
+ head, and does all the harm on Saturdays and so many other days
+ besides.
+</p>
+<p>
+ To-day&mdash;how are you? It <i>was</i> right and just for me to write this
+ time, after the two dear notes ... the one on Saturday night which
+ made me praise you to myself and think you kinder than kindest, and
+ the other on Monday morning which took me unaware&mdash;such a note, <i>that</i>
+ was! Oh it <i>was</i> right and just that I should not teaze you to send me
+ another after those two others,&mdash;yet I was very near doing it&mdash;yet I
+ should like infinitely to hear to-day how you
+ are&mdash;unreasonable!&mdash;Well! you will write now&mdash;you will answer what I
+ am writing, and mention yourself particularly and sincerely&mdash;Remember!
+ Above all, you will care for your head. I have been thinking since
+ yesterday that, coming out of the cold, you might not have refused as
+ usual to take something ... hot wine and water, or coffee? Will you
+ have coffee with me on Saturday? 'Shunning the salt,' will you have
+ the sugar? And do tell me, for I have been thinking, are you careful
+ as to diet&mdash;and will such sublunary things as coffee and tea and cocoa
+ affect your head&mdash;<i>for</i> or <i>against</i>! Then you do not touch wine&mdash;and
+ perhaps you ought. Surely something may be found or done to do you
+ good. If it had not been for me, you would be travelling in Italy by
+ this time and quite well perhaps.
+</p>
+<p>
+ This morning I had a letter from Miss Martineau and really read it to
+ the end without thinking it too long, which is extraordinary for me
+ just now, and scarcely ordinary in the letter, and indeed it is a
+ delightful letter, as letters go, which are not yours! You shall take
+ it with you on Saturday to read, and you shall see that it is worth
+ reading, and interesting for Wordsworth's sake and her own. Mr.
+ Kenyon has it now, because he presses on to have her letters, and I
+ should not like to tell him that you had it first from me.... Also
+ Saturday will be time enough.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Oh&mdash;poor Mr. Horne! shall I tell you some of his offences? That he
+ desires to be called at four in the morning, and does not get up till
+ eight. That he pours libations on his bare head out of the
+ water-glasses at great dinners. That being in the midst of
+ sportsmen&mdash;rural aristocrats&mdash;lords of soil&mdash;and all talking learnedly
+ of pointers' noses and spaniels' ears; he has exclaimed aloud in a
+ mocking paraphrase&mdash;'If I were to hold up a horse by the tail.' The
+ wit is certainly doubtful!&mdash;That being asked to dinner on Tuesday, he
+ will go on Wednesday instead.&mdash;That he throws himself at full length
+ with a gesture approaching to a 'summerset' on satin sofas. That he
+ giggles. That he only <i>thinks</i> he can talk. That his ignorance on all
+ subjects is astounding. That he never read the old ballads, nor saw
+ Percy's collection. That he asked <i>who</i> wrote 'Drink to me only with
+ thine eyes.' That after making himself ridiculous in attempting to
+ speak at a public meeting, he said to a compassionate friend 'I got
+ very well out of <i>that</i>.' That, in writing his work on Napoleon, he
+ employed a man to study the subject for him. That he cares for
+ nobody's poetry or fame except his own, and considers Tennyson chiefly
+ illustrious as being his contemporary. That, as to politics, he
+ doesn't care '<i>which</i> side.' That he is always talking of 'my shares,'
+ 'my income,' as if he were a Kilmansegg. Lastly (and understand, this
+ is <i>my</i> 'lastly' and not Miss Mitford's, who is far from being out of
+ breath so soon) that he has a mania for heiresses&mdash;that he has gone
+ out at half past five and 'proposed' to Miss M or N with fifty
+ thousand pounds, and being rejected (as the lady thought fit to report
+ herself) came back to tea and the same evening 'fell in love' with
+ Miss O or P ... with forty thousand&mdash;went away for a few months, and
+ upon his next visit, did as much to a Miss Q or W, on the promise of
+ four blood horses&mdash;has a prospect now of a Miss R or S&mdash;with hounds,
+ perhaps.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Too, too bad&mdash;isn't it? I would repeat none of it except to you&mdash;and
+ as to the worst part, the last, why some may be coincidence, and some,
+ exaggeration, for I have not the least doubt that every now and then a
+ fine poetical compliment was turned into a serious thing by the
+ listener, and then the poor poet had critics as well as listeners all
+ round him. Also, he rather 'wears his heart on his sleeve,' there is
+ no denying&mdash;and in other respects he is not much better, perhaps, than
+ other men. But for the base traffic of the affair&mdash;I do not believe a
+ word. He is too generous&mdash;has too much real sensibility. I fought his
+ battle, poor Orion. 'And so,' she said 'you believe it possible for a
+ disinterested man to become really attached to two women, heiresses,
+ on the same day?' I doubted the <i>fact</i>. And then she showed me a note,
+ an autograph note from the poet, confessing the M or N part of the
+ business&mdash;while Miss O or P confessed herself, said Miss Mitford. But
+ I persisted in doubting, notwithstanding the lady's confessions, or
+ convictions, as they might be. And just think of Mr. Horne not having
+ tact enough to keep out of these multitudinous scrapes, for those few
+ days which on three separate occasions he paid Miss Mitford in a
+ neighbourhood where all were strangers to him,&mdash;and never outstaying
+ his week! He must have been <i>foolish</i>, read it all how we may.
+</p>
+<p>
+ And so am <i>I</i>, to write this 'personal talk' to you when you will not
+ care for it&mdash;yet you asked me, and it may make you smile, though
+ Wordsworth's tea-kettle outsings it all.
+</p>
+<p>
+ When your Monday letter came, I was reading the criticism on Hunt and
+ his Italian poets, in the <i>Examiner</i>. How I liked to be pulled by the
+ sleeve to your translations!&mdash;How I liked everything!&mdash;Pulci, Pietro
+ ... and you, best!
+</p>
+<p>
+ Yet here's a naiveté which I found in your letter! I will write it out
+ that you may read it&mdash;
+</p>
+<p>
+ 'However it' (the headache) 'was no sooner gone in a degree, than a
+ worse plague came&mdash;<i>I sate thinking of you</i>.'
+</p>
+<p>
+ Very satisfactory <i>that</i> is, and very clear.
+</p>
+<p>
+ May God bless you dearest, dearest! Be careful of yourself. The cold
+ makes me <i>languid</i>, as heat is apt to make everybody; but I am not
+ unwell, and keep up the fire and the thoughts of you.
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">Your worse ... worst plague</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">Your own</p>
+<p style="text-align: right"><SPAN class="sc-ex">Ba</span>.
+</p>
+<p>
+ I shall hear? yes! And admire my obedience in having written 'a long
+ letter' <i>to</i> the letter!
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>R.B. to E.B.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Wednesday Morning.<br>
+[Post-mark, February 11, 1846.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ My sweetest 'plague,' <i>did</i> I really write that sentence so, without
+ gloss or comment in close vicinity? I can hardly think it&mdash;but you
+ know well, well where the real plague lay,&mdash;that I thought of you as
+ thinking, in your infinite goodness, of untoward chances which had
+ kept me from you&mdash;and if I did not dwell more particularly on that
+ thinking of <i>yours</i>, which became as I say, in the knowledge of it, a
+ plague when brought before me <i>with</i> the thought of you,&mdash;if I passed
+ this slightly over it was for pure unaffected shame that I should take
+ up the care and stop the 'reverie serene' of&mdash;ah, the rhyme <i>lets</i> me
+ say&mdash;'sweetest eyes were ever seen'&mdash;were <i>ever</i> seen! And yourself
+ confess, in the Saturday's note, to having been 'unhappy for half an
+ hour till' &amp;c. &amp;c.&mdash;and do not I feel <i>that</i> here, and am not I
+ plagued by it?
+</p>
+<p>
+ Well, having begun at the end of your letter, dearest, I will go back
+ gently (that is backwards) and tell you I 'sate thinking' too, and
+ with no greater comfort, on the cold yesterday. The pond before the
+ window was frozen ('so as to bear sparrows' somebody said) and I knew
+ you would feel it&mdash;'but you are not unwell'&mdash;really? thank God&mdash;and
+ the month wears on. Beside I have got a reassurance&mdash;you asked me once
+ if I were superstitious, I remember (as what do I forget that you
+ say?). However that may be, yesterday morning as I turned to look for
+ a book, an old fancy seized me to try the 'sortes' and dip into the
+ first page of the first I chanced upon, for my fortune; I said 'what
+ will be the event of my love for Her'&mdash;in so many words&mdash;and my book
+ turned out to be&mdash;'Cerutti's Italian Grammar!'&mdash;a propitious source of
+ information ... the best to be hoped, what could it prove but some
+ assurance that you were in the Dative Case, or I, not in the ablative
+ absolute? I do protest that, with the knowledge of so many horrible
+ pitfalls, or rather spring guns with wires on every bush ... such
+ dreadful possibilities of stumbling on 'conditional moods,' 'imperfect
+ tenses,' 'singular numbers,'&mdash;I should have been too glad to put up
+ with the safe spot for the sole of my foot though no larger than
+ afforded by such a word as 'Conjunction,' 'possessive pronoun&mdash;,'
+ secure so far from poor Tippet's catastrophe. Well, I ventured, and
+ what did I find? <i>This</i>&mdash;which I copy from the book now&mdash;'<i>If we love
+ in the other world as we do in this, I shall love thee to
+ eternity</i>'&mdash;from 'Promiscuous Exercises,' to be translated into
+ Italian, at the end.
+</p>
+<p>
+ And now I reach Horne and his characteristics&mdash;of which I can tell you
+ with confidence that they are grossly misrepresented where not
+ altogether false&mdash;whether it proceed from inability to see what one
+ may see, or disinclination, I cannot say. I know very little of Horne,
+ but my one visit to him a few weeks ago would show the uncandidness of
+ those charges: for instance, he talked a good deal about horses,
+ meaning to ride in Ireland, and described very cleverly an old hunter
+ he had hired once,&mdash;how it galloped and could not walk; also he
+ propounded a theory of the true method of behaving in the saddle when
+ a horse rears, which I besought him only to practise in fancy on the
+ sofa, where he lay telling it. So much for professing his ignorance in
+ that matter! On a sofa he does throw himself&mdash;but when thrown there,
+ he can talk, with Miss Mitford's leave, admirably,&mdash;I never heard
+ better stories than Horne's&mdash;some Spanish-American incidents of travel
+ want printing&mdash;or have been printed, for aught I know. That he cares
+ for nobody's poetry is <i>false</i>, he praises more unregardingly of his
+ own retreat, more unprovidingly for his own fortune,&mdash;(do I speak
+ clearly?)&mdash;less like a man who himself has written somewhat in the
+ 'line' of the other man he is praising&mdash;which 'somewhat' has to be
+ guarded in its interests, &amp;c., less like the poor professional praise
+ of the 'craft' than any other I ever met&mdash;instance after instance
+ starting into my mind as I write. To his income I never heard him
+ allude&mdash;unless one should so interpret a remark to me this last time
+ we met, that he had been on some occasion put to inconvenience by
+ somebody's withholding ten or twelve pounds due to him for an article,
+ and promised in the confidence of getting them to a tradesman, which
+ does not look like 'boasting of his income'! As for the heiresses&mdash;I
+ don't believe one word of it, of the succession and transition and
+ trafficking. Altogether, what miserable 'set-offs' to the achievement
+ of an 'Orion,' a 'Marlowe,' a 'Delora'! Miss Martineau understands him
+ better.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Now I come to myself and my health. I am quite well now&mdash;at all
+ events, much better, just a little turning in the head&mdash;since you
+ appeal to my sincerity. For the coffee&mdash;thank you, indeed thank you,
+ but nothing after the '<i>oenomel</i>' and before half past six. <i>I</i> know
+ all about that song and its Greek original if Horne does not&mdash;and can
+ tell you&mdash;, how truly...!
+</p>
+<blockquote><blockquote><blockquote><blockquote><blockquote><blockquote><p style="text-indent: 0em">The thirst that from the soul doth rise<br>
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
+Doth ask a drink divine&mdash;<br>
+But might I of Jove's nectar sup<br>
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
+I would not change for thine! <i>No, no, no!</i>
+</p>
+</blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><p style="text-indent: 0em">And by the bye, I have misled you as my wont is, on the subject of
+ wine, 'that I do not touch it'&mdash;not habitually, nor so as to feel the
+ loss of it, that on a principle; but every now and then of course.
+</p>
+<p>
+ And now, 'Luria', so long as the parts cohere and the whole is
+ discernible, all will be well yet. I shall not look at it, nor think
+ of it, for a week or two, and then see what I have forgotten. Domizia
+ is all wrong; I told you I knew that her special colour had faded,&mdash;it
+ was but a bright line, and the more distinctly deep that it was so
+ narrow. One of my half dozen words on my scrap of paper 'pro memoria'
+ was, under the 'Act V.' '<i>she loves</i>'&mdash;to which I could not bring it,
+ you see! Yet the play requires it still,&mdash;something may yet be
+ effected, though.... I meant that she should propose to go to Pisa
+ with him, and begin a new life. But there is no hurry&mdash;I suppose it is
+ no use publishing much before Easter&mdash;I will try and remember what my
+ whole character <i>did</i> mean&mdash;it was, in two words, understood at the
+ time by 'panther's-beauty'&mdash;on which hint I ought to have spoken! But
+ the work grew cold, and you came between, and the sun put out the fire
+ on the hearth <i>nec vult panthera domari</i>!
+</p>
+<p>
+ For the 'Soul's Tragedy'&mdash;<i>that</i> will surprise you, I think. There is
+ no trace of you there,&mdash;you have not put out the black face of
+ <i>it</i>&mdash;it is all sneering and <i>disillusion</i>&mdash;and shall not be printed
+ but burned if you say the word&mdash;now wait and see and then say! I will
+ bring the first of the two parts next Saturday.
+</p>
+<p>
+ And now, dearest, I am with you&mdash;and the other matters are forgotten
+ already. God bless you, I am ever your own R. You will write to me I
+ trust? And tell me how to bear the cold.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>E.B.B. to R.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">[Post-mark, February 12, 1846.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ Ah, the 'sortes'! Is it a double oracle&mdash;'swan and shadow'&mdash;do you
+ think? or do my eyes see double, dazzled by the light of it? 'I shall
+ love thee to eternity'&mdash;I <i>shall</i>.
+</p>
+<p>
+ And as for the wine, I did not indeed misunderstand you 'as my wont
+ is,' because I understood simply that 'habitually' you abstained from
+ wine, and I meant exactly that perhaps it would be better for your
+ health to take it habitually. It <i>might</i>, you know&mdash;not that I pretend
+ to advise. Only when you look so much too pale sometimes, it comes
+ into one's thoughts that you ought not to live on cresses and cold
+ water. Strong coffee, which is the nearest to a stimulant that I dare
+ to take, as far as ordinary diet goes, will almost always deliver <i>me</i>
+ from the worst of headaches, but there is no likeness, no comparison.
+ And your 'quite well' means that dreadful 'turning' still ... still!
+ Now do not think any more of the Domizias, nor 'try to remember,'
+ which is the most wearing way of thinking. The more I read and read
+ your 'Luria,' the grander it looks, and it will make its own road with
+ all understanding men, you need not doubt, and still less need you try
+ to make me uneasy about the harm I have done in 'coming between,' and
+ all the rest of it. I wish never to do you greater harm than just
+ <i>that</i>, and then with a white conscience 'I shall love thee to
+ eternity!... dearest! You have made a golden work out of your
+ 'golden-hearted Luria'&mdash;as once you called him to me, and I hold it in
+ the highest admiration&mdash;<i>should</i>, if you were precisely nothing to me.
+ And still, the fifth act <i>rises</i>! That is certain. Nevertheless I seem
+ to agree with you that your hand has vacillated in your Domizia. We do
+ not know her with as full a light on her face, as the other
+ persons&mdash;we do not see the <i>panther</i>,&mdash;no, certainly we do not&mdash;but
+ you will do a very little for her which will be everything, after a
+ time ... and I assure you that if you were to ask for the manuscript
+ before, you should not have a page of it&mdash;<i>now</i>, you are only to rest.
+ What a work to rest upon! Do consider what a triumph it is! The more I
+ read, the more I think of it, the greater it grows&mdash;and as to 'faded
+ lines,' you never cut a pomegranate that was redder in the deep of it.
+ Also, no one can say 'This is not clearly written.' The people who are
+ at 'words of one syllable' may be puzzled by you and Wordsworth
+ together this time ... as far as the expression goes. Subtle thoughts
+ you always must have, in and out of 'Sordello'&mdash;and the objectors
+ would find even Plato (though his medium is as lucid as the water that
+ ran beside the beautiful plane-tree!) a little difficult perhaps.
+</p>
+<p>
+ To-day Mr. Kenyon came, and do you know, he has made a beatific
+ confusion between last Saturday and next Saturday, and said to me he
+ had told Miss Thomson to mind to come on Friday if she wished to see
+ me ... 'remembering' (he added) 'that Mr. Browning took <i>Saturday</i>!!'
+ So I let him mistake the one week for the other&mdash;'Mr. Browning took
+ Saturday,' it was true, both ways. Well&mdash;and then he went on to tell
+ me that he had heard from Mrs. Jameson who was at Brighton and unwell,
+ and had written to say this and that to him, and to enquire
+ besides&mdash;now, what do you think, she enquired besides? 'how you and
+ ... Browning were' said Mr. Kenyon&mdash;I write his words. He is coming,
+ perhaps to-morrow, or perhaps Sunday&mdash;Saturday is to have a twofold
+ safety. That is, if you are not ill again. Dearest, you will not think
+ of coming if you are ill ... unwell even. I shall not be frightened
+ next time, as I told you&mdash;I shall have the precedent. Before, I had to
+ think! 'It has never happened <i>so</i>&mdash;there must be a cause&mdash;and if it
+ is a very, very, bad cause, why no one will tell <i>me</i> ... it will not
+ seem <i>my</i> concern'&mdash;<i>that</i> was my thought on Saturday. But another
+ time ... only, if it is possible to keep well, do keep well, beloved,
+ and think of me instead of Domizia, and let there be no other time for
+ your suffering ... my waiting is nothing. I shall remember for the
+ future that you may have the headache&mdash;and do you remember it too!
+</p>
+<p>
+ For Mr. Horne I take your testimony gladly and believingly. <i>She
+ blots</i> with her <i>eyes</i> sometimes. She hates ... and loves, in extreme
+ degrees. We have, once or twice or thrice, been on the border of
+ mutual displeasure, on this very subject, for I grew really vexed to
+ observe the trust on one side and the <i>dyspathy</i> on the other&mdash;using
+ the mildest of words. You see, he found himself, down in Berkshire, in
+ quite a strange element of society,&mdash;he, an artist in his good and his
+ evil,&mdash;and the people there, 'county families,' smoothly plumed in
+ their conventions, and classing the ringlets and the aboriginal way of
+ using water-glasses among offences against the Moral Law. Then,
+ meaning to be agreeable, or fascinating perhaps, made it twenty times
+ worse. Writing in albums about the graces, discoursing meditated
+ impromptus at picnics, playing on the guitar in fancy dresses,&mdash;all
+ these things which seemed to poor Orion as natural as his own stars I
+ dare say, and just the things suited to the <i>genus</i> poet, and to
+ himself specifically,&mdash;were understood by the natives and their 'rural
+ deities' to signify, that he intended to marry one half the county,
+ and to run away with the other. But Miss Mitford should have known
+ better&mdash;<i>she</i> should. And she <i>would</i> have known better, if she had
+ liked him&mdash;for the liking could have been unmade by no such offences.
+ She is too fervent a friend&mdash;she can be. Generous too, she can be
+ without an effort; and I have had much affection from her&mdash;and accuse
+ myself for seeming to have less&mdash;but&mdash;
+</p>
+<p>
+ May God bless you!&mdash;I end in haste after this long lingering.
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">Your</p>
+<p style="text-align: right"><SPAN class="sc-ex">Ba</span>.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Not unwell&mdash;<i>I</i> am not! I forgot it, which proves how I am not.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>R.B. to E.B.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Friday Morning.<br>
+[Post-mark, February 13, 1846.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ Two nights ago I read the 'Soul's Tragedy' once more, and though there
+ were not a few points which still struck me as successful in design
+ and execution, yet on the whole I came to a decided opinion, that it
+ will be better to postpone the publication of it for the present. It
+ is not a good ending, an auspicious wind-up of this series;
+ subject-matter and style are alike unpopular even for the literary
+ <i>grex</i> that stands aloof from the purer <i>plebs</i>, and uses that
+ privilege to display and parade an ignorance which the other is
+ altogether unconscious of&mdash;so that, if 'Luria' is <i>clearish</i>, the
+ 'Tragedy' would be an unnecessary troubling the waters. Whereas, if I
+ printed it first in order, my readers, according to custom, would make
+ the (comparatively) little they did not see into, a full excuse for
+ shutting their eyes at the rest, and we may as well part friends, so
+ as not to meet enemies. But, at bottom, I believe the proper objection
+ is to the immediate, <i>first</i> effect of the whole&mdash;its moral
+ effect&mdash;which is dependent on the contrary supposition of its being
+ really understood, in the main drift of it. Yet I don't know; for I
+ wrote it with the intention of producing the best of all
+ effects&mdash;perhaps the truth is, that I am tired, rather, and desirous
+ of getting done, and 'Luria' will answer my purpose so far. Will not
+ the best way be to reserve this unlucky play and in the event of a
+ second edition&mdash;as Moxon seems to think such an apparition
+ possible&mdash;might not this be quietly inserted?&mdash;in its place, too, for
+ it was written two or three years ago. I have lost, of late, interest
+ in dramatic writing, as you know, and, perhaps, occasion. And,
+ dearest, I mean to take your advice and be quiet awhile and let my
+ mind get used to its new medium of sight; seeing all things, as it
+ does, through you: and then, let all I have done be the prelude and
+ the real work begin. I felt it would be so before, and told you at the
+ very beginning&mdash;do you remember? And you spoke of Io 'in the proem.'
+ How much more should follow now!
+</p>
+<p>
+ And if nothing follows, I have <i>you</i>.
+</p>
+<p>
+ I shall see you to-morrow and be happy. To-day&mdash;is it the weather or
+ what?&mdash;something depresses me a little&mdash;to-morrow brings the remedy
+ for it all. I don't know why I mention such a matter; except that I
+ tell you everything without a notion of after-consequence; and because
+ your dearest, dearest presence seems under any circumstances as if
+ created just to help me <i>there</i>; if my spirits rise they fly to you;
+ if they fall, they hold by you and cease falling&mdash;as now. Bless you,
+ Ba&mdash;my own best blessing that you are! But a few hours and I am with
+ you, beloved!
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">Your own
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>E.B.B. to R.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Saturday Evening.<br>
+[Post-mark, February 16, 1846.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ Ever dearest, though you wanted to make me say one thing displeasing
+ to you to-day, I had not courage to say two instead ... which I might
+ have done indeed and indeed! For I am capable of thinking both
+ thoughts of 'next year,' as you suggested them:&mdash;because while you are
+ with me I see only <i>you</i>, and you being you, I cannot doubt a power of
+ yours nor measure the deep loving nature which I feel to be so
+ deep&mdash;so that there may be ever so many 'mores,' and no 'more' wonder
+ of mine!&mdash;but afterwards, when the door is shut and there is no 'more'
+ light nor speaking until Thursday, why <i>then</i>, that I do not see <i>you</i>
+ but <i>me</i>,&mdash;<i>then</i> comes the reaction,&mdash;the natural lengthening of the
+ shadows at sunset,&mdash;and <i>then</i>, the 'less, less, less' grows to seem
+ as natural to my fate, as the 'more' seemed to your nature&mdash;I being I!
+</p>
+<p>
+ <i>Sunday.</i>&mdash;Well!&mdash;you are to try to forgive it all! And the truth,
+ over and under all, is, that I scarcely ever do think of the future,
+ scarcely ever further than to your next visit, and almost never
+ beyond, except for your sake and in reference to that view of the
+ question which I have vexed you with so often, in fearing for your
+ happiness. Once it was a habit of mind with me to live altogether in
+ what I called the future&mdash;but the tops of the trees that looked
+ towards Troy were broken off in the great winds, and falling down into
+ the river beneath, where now after all this time they grow green
+ again, I let them float along the current gently and pleasantly. Can
+ it be better I wonder! And if it becomes worse, can I help it? Also
+ the future never seemed to belong to me so little&mdash;never! It might
+ appear wonderful to most persons, it is startling even to myself
+ sometimes, to observe how free from anxiety I am&mdash;from the sort of
+ anxiety which might be well connected with my own position <i>here</i>, and
+ which is personal to myself. <i>That</i> is all thrown behind&mdash;into the
+ bushes&mdash;long ago it was, and I think I told you of it before.
+ Agitation comes from indecision&mdash;and <i>I</i> was decided from the first
+ hour when I admitted the possibility of your loving me really.
+ Now,&mdash;as the Euphuists used to say,&mdash;I am 'more thine than my own' ...
+ it is a literal truth&mdash;and my future belongs to you; if it was mine,
+ it was mine to give, and if it was mine to give, it was given, and if
+ it was given ... beloved....
+</p>
+<p>
+ So you see!
+</p>
+<p>
+ Then I will confess to you that all my life long I have had a rather
+ strange sympathy and dyspathy&mdash;the sympathy having concerned the genus
+ <i>jilt</i> (as vulgarly called) male and female&mdash;and the dyspathy&mdash;the
+ whole class of heroically virtuous persons who make sacrifices of what
+ they call 'love' to what they call 'duty.' There are exceptional cases
+ of course, but, for the most part, I listen incredulously or else with
+ a little contempt to those latter proofs of strength&mdash;or weakness, as
+ it may be:&mdash;people are not usually praised for giving up their
+ religion, for unsaying their oaths, for desecrating their 'holy
+ things'&mdash;while believing them still to be religious and sacramental!
+ On the other side I have always and shall always understand how it is
+ possible for the most earnest and faithful of men and even of women
+ perhaps, to err in the convictions of the heart as well as of the
+ mind, to profess an affection which is an illusion, and to recant and
+ retreat loyally at the eleventh hour, on becoming aware of the truth
+ which is in them. Such men are the truest of men, and the most
+ courageous for the truth's sake, and instead of blaming them I hold
+ them in honour, for me, and always did and shall.
+</p>
+<p>
+ And while I write, you are 'very ill'&mdash;very ill!&mdash;how it looks,
+ written down <i>so</i>! When you were gone yesterday and my thoughts had
+ tossed about restlessly for ever so long, I was wise enough to ask
+ Wilson how <i>she</i> thought you were looking, ... and she 'did not know'
+ ... she 'had not observed' ... 'only certainly Mr. Browning ran
+ up-stairs instead of walking as he did the time before.'
+</p>
+<p>
+ Now promise me dearest, dearest&mdash;not to trifle with your health. Not
+ to neglect yourself ... not to tire yourself ... and besides to take
+ the advice of your medical friend as to diet and general
+ treatment:&mdash;because there must be a wrong and a right in everything,
+ and the right is very important under your circumstances ... if you
+ have a tendency to illness. It may be right for you to have wine for
+ instance. Did you ever try the putting your feet into hot water at
+ night, to prevent the recurrence of the morning headache&mdash;for the
+ affection of the head comes on early in the morning, does it not? just
+ as if the sleeping did you harm. Now I have heard of such a remedy
+ doing good&mdash;and could it <i>increase</i> the evil?&mdash;mustard mixed with the
+ water, remember. Everything approaching to <i>congestion</i> is full of
+ fear&mdash;I tremble to think of it&mdash;and I bring no remedy by this teazing
+ neither! But you will not be 'wicked' nor 'unkind,' nor provoke the
+ evil consciously&mdash;you will keep quiet and forswear the going out at
+ nights, the excitement and noise of parties, and the worse excitement
+ of composition&mdash;you promise. If you knew how I keep thinking of you,
+ and at intervals grow so frightened! Think <i>you</i>, that you are three
+ times as much to me as I can be to you at best and greatest,&mdash;because
+ you are more than three times the larger planet&mdash;and because too, you
+ have known other sources of light and happiness ... but I need not say
+ this&mdash;and I shall hear on Monday, and may trust to you every day ...
+ may I not? Yet I would trust my soul to you sooner than your own
+ health.
+</p>
+<p>
+ May God bless you, dear, dearest. If the first part of the 'Soul's
+ Tragedy' should be written out, I can read <i>that</i> perhaps, without
+ drawing you in to think of the second. Still it may be safer to keep
+ off altogether for the present&mdash;and let it be as you incline. I do not
+ speak of 'Luria.'
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">Your own</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">BA.
+</p>
+<p>
+ If it were not for Mr. Kenyon, I should say, almost, Wednesday,
+ instead of Thursday&mdash;I want to see you so much, and to see for myself
+ about the looks and spirits, only it would not do if he found you here
+ on Wednesday. Let him come to-morrow or on Tuesday, and Wednesday will
+ be safe&mdash;shall we consider? what do you think?
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>R.B. to E.B.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Sunday Afternoon.<br>
+[Post-mark, February 16, 1846.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ Here is the letter again, dearest: I suppose it gives me the same
+ pleasure, in reading, as you&mdash;and Mr. K. as me, and anybody else as
+ him; if all the correspondence which was claimed again and burnt on
+ some principle or other some years ago be at all of the nature of this
+ sample, the measure seems questionable. Burn anybody's <i>real</i>
+ letters, well and good: they move and live&mdash;the thoughts, feelings,
+ and expressions even,&mdash;in a self-imposed circle limiting the
+ experience of two persons only&mdash;<i>there</i> is the standard, and to <i>that</i>
+ the appeal&mdash;how should a third person know? His presence breaks the
+ line, so to speak, and lets in a whole tract of country on the
+ originally inclosed spot&mdash;so that its trees, which were from side to
+ side there, seem left alone and wondering at their sudden unimportance
+ in the broad land; while its 'ferns such as I never saw before' and
+ which have been petted proportionably, look extravagant enough amid
+ the new spread of good honest grey grass that is now the earth's
+ general wear. So that the significance is lost at once, and whole
+ value of such letters&mdash;the cypher changed, the vowel-points removed:
+ but how can that affect clever writing like this? What do you, to whom
+ it is addressed, see in it more than the world that wants to see it
+ and shan't have it? One understands shutting an unprivileged eye to
+ the ineffable mysteries of those 'upper-rooms,' now that the broom and
+ dust pan, stocking-mending and gingerbread-making are invested with
+ such unforeseen reverence ... but the carriage-sweep and quarry,
+ together with Jane and our baskets, and a pleasant shadow of
+ Wordsworth's Sunday hat preceding his own rapid strides in the
+ direction of Miss Fenwick's house&mdash;surely, 'men's eyes were made to
+ see, so let them gaze' at all <i>this</i>! And so I, gazing with a clear
+ conscience, am very glad to hear so much good of a very good person
+ and so well told. She plainly sees the proper use and advantage of a
+ country-life; and <i>that</i> knowledge gets to seem a high point of
+ attainment doubtless by the side of the Wordsworth she speaks of&mdash;for
+ <i>mine</i> he shall not be as long as I am able! Was ever such a '<i>great</i>'
+ poet before? Put one trait with the other&mdash;the theory of rural
+ innocence&mdash;alternation of 'vulgar trifles' with dissertating with
+ style of 'the utmost grandeur that <i>even you</i> can conceive' (speak for
+ yourself, Miss M.!)&mdash;and that amiable transition from two o'clock's
+ grief at the death of one's brother to three o'clock's happiness in
+ the 'extraordinary mesmeric discourse' of one's friend. All this, and
+ the rest of the serene and happy inspired daily life which a piece of
+ 'unpunctuality' can ruin, and to which the guardian 'angel' brings as
+ crowning qualification the knack of poking the fire adroitly&mdash;of
+ this&mdash;what can one say but that&mdash;no, best hold one's tongue and read
+ the 'Lyrical Ballads' with finger in ear. Did not Shelley say long ago
+ 'He had no more <i>imagination</i> than a pint-pot'&mdash;though in those days
+ he used to walk about France and Flanders like a man? <i>Now</i>, he is
+ 'most comfortable in his worldly affairs' and just this comes of it!
+ He lives the best twenty years of his life after the way of his own
+ heart&mdash;and when one presses in to see the result of the rare
+ experiment ... what the <i>one</i> alchemist whom fortune has allowed to
+ get all his coveted materials and set to work at last in earnest with
+ fire and melting-pot&mdash;what <i>he</i> produces after all the talk of him and
+ the like of him; why, you get <i>pulvis et cinis</i>&mdash;a man at the mercy of
+ the tongs and shovel!
+</p>
+<p>
+ Well! Let us despair at nothing, but, wishing success to the newer
+ aspirant, expect better things from Miss M. when the 'knoll,' and
+ 'paradise,' and their facilities, operate properly; and that she will
+ make a truer estimate of the importance and responsibilities of
+ 'authorship' than she does at present, if I understand rightly the
+ sense in which she describes her own life as it means to be; for in
+ one sense it is all good and well, and quite natural that she should
+ like 'that sort of strenuous handwork' better than book-making; like
+ the play better than the labour, as we are apt to do. If she realises
+ a very ordinary scheme of literary life, planned under the eye of God
+ not 'the public,' and prosecuted under the constant sense of the
+ night's coming which ends it good or bad&mdash;then, she will be sure to
+ 'like' the rest and sport&mdash;teaching her maids and sewing her gloves
+ and making delicate visitors comfortable&mdash;so much more rational a
+ resource is the worst of them than gin-and-water, for instance. But
+ if, as I rather suspect, these latter are to figure as a virtual
+ <i>half</i> duty of the whole Man&mdash;as of equal importance (on the ground of
+ the innocence and utility of such occupations) with the book-making
+ aforesaid&mdash;always supposing <i>that</i> to be of the right kind&mdash;<i>then</i> I
+ respect Miss M. just as I should an Archbishop of Canterbury whose
+ business was the teaching A.B.C. at an infant-school&mdash;he who might set
+ on the Tens to instruct the Hundreds how to convince the Thousands of
+ the propriety of doing that and many other things. Of course one will
+ respect him only the more if when <i>that</i> matter is off his mind he
+ relaxes at such a school instead of over a chess-board; as it will
+ increase our love for Miss M. to find that making 'my good Jane (from
+ Tyne-mouth)'&mdash;'happier and&mdash;I hope&mdash;wiser' is an amusement, or more,
+ after the day's progress towards the 'novel for next year' which is to
+ inspire thousands, beyond computation, with the ardour of making
+ innumerable other Janes and delicate relatives happier and wiser&mdash;who
+ knows but as many as Burns did, and does, so make happier and wiser?
+ Only, <i>his quarry</i> and after-solace was that 'marble bowl often
+ replenished with whiskey' on which Dr. Curry discourses mournfully,
+ 'Oh, be wiser Thou!'&mdash;and remember it was only <i>after</i> Lord Bacon had
+ written to an end <i>his</i> Book&mdash;given us for ever the Art of
+ Inventing&mdash;whether steam-engine or improved dust-pan&mdash;that he took on
+ himself to do a little exemplary 'hand work'; got out on that cold St.
+ Alban's road to stuff a fowl with snow and so keep it fresh, and got
+ into his bed and died of the cold in his hands ('strenuous <i>hand</i>
+ work'&mdash;) before the snow had time to melt. He did not begin in his
+ youth by saying&mdash;'I have a horror of merely writing 'Novum Organums'
+ and shall give half my energies to the stuffing fowls'!
+</p>
+<p>
+ All this it is <i>my</i> amusement, of an indifferent kind, to put down
+ solely on the pleasant assurance contained in that postscript, of the
+ one way of never quarrelling with Miss M.&mdash;'by joining in her plan
+ and practice of plain speaking'&mdash;could she but 'get people to do it!'
+ Well, she gets me for a beginner: the funny thing would be to know
+ what Chorley's desperate utterance amounted to! Did you ever hear of
+ the plain speaking of some of the continental lottery-projectors? An
+ estate on the Rhine, for instance, is to be disposed of, and the
+ holder of the lucky ticket will find himself suddenly owner of a
+ mediæval castle with an unlimited number of dependencies&mdash;vineyards,
+ woods, pastures, and so forth&mdash;all only waiting the new master's
+ arrival&mdash;while inside, all is swept and garnished (not to say,
+ varnished)&mdash;the tables are spread, the wines on the board, all is
+ ready for the reception <i>but</i> ... here 'plain speaking' becomes
+ necessary&mdash;it prevents quarrels, and, could the projector get people
+ to practise it as he does all would be well; so he, at least, will
+ speak plainly&mdash;you hear what <i>is</i> provided but, he cannot, dares not
+ withhold what is <i>not</i>&mdash;there is then, to speak plainly,&mdash;no night
+ cap! You <i>will</i> have to bring your own night cap. The projector
+ furnishes somewhat, as you hear, but not <i>all</i>&mdash;and now&mdash;the worst is
+ heard,&mdash;will you quarrel with him? Will my own dear, dearest Ba please
+ and help me here, and fancy Chorley's concessions, and tributes, and
+ recognitions, and then, at the very end, the 'plain words,' to
+ counterbalance all, that have been to overlook and pardon?
+</p>
+<p>
+ Oh, my own Ba, hear <i>my</i> plain speech&mdash;and how this is <i>not</i> an
+ attempt to frighten you out of your dear wish to '<i>hear</i> from me'&mdash;no,
+ indeed&mdash;but a whim, a caprice,&mdash;and now it is out! over, done with!
+ And now I am with you again&mdash;it is to <i>you</i> I shall write next. Bless
+ you, ever&mdash;my beloved. I am much better, indeed&mdash;and mean to be well.
+ And you! But I will write&mdash;this goes for nothing&mdash;or only <i>this</i>, that
+ I am your very own&mdash;
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>R.B. to E.B.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Monday.<br>
+[Post-mark, February 16, 1846.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ My long letter is with you, dearest, to show how serious my illness
+ was 'while you wrote': unless you find that letter too foolish, as I
+ do on twice thinking&mdash;or at all events a most superfluous bestowment
+ of handwork while the heart was elsewhere, and with you&mdash;never more
+ so! Dear, dear Ba, your adorable goodness sinks into me till it nearly
+ pains,&mdash;so exquisite and strange is the pleasure: <i>so</i> you care for
+ me, and think of me, and write to me!&mdash;I shall never die for you, and
+ if it could be so, what would death prove? But I can live on, your own
+ as now,&mdash;utterly your own.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Dear Ba, do you suppose we differ on so plain a point as that of the
+ superior wisdom, and generosity, too, of announcing such a change &amp;c.
+ at the eleventh hour? There can be no doubt of it,&mdash;and now, what of
+ it to me?
+</p>
+<p>
+ But I am not going to write to-day&mdash;only this&mdash;that I am better,
+ having not been quite so well last night&mdash;so I shut up books (that is,
+ of my own) and mean to think about nothing but you, and you, and still
+ you, for a whole week&mdash;so all will come right, I hope! <i>May</i> I take
+ Wednesday? And do you say that,&mdash;hint at the possibility of that,
+ because you have been reached by my own remorse at feeling that if I
+ had kept my appointment <i>last</i> Saturday (but one)&mdash;Thursday would have
+ been my day this past week, and this very Monday had been gained?
+ Shall I not lose a day for ever unless I get Wednesday and
+ Saturday?&mdash;yet ... care ... dearest&mdash;let nothing horrible happen.
+</p>
+<p>
+ If I do not hear to the contrary to-morrow&mdash;or on Wednesday early&mdash;
+</p>
+<p>
+ But write and bless me dearest, most dear Ba. God bless you ever&mdash;
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>E.B.B. to R.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Monday Morning.<br>
+[Post-mark, February 17, 1846.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ <i>Méchant comme quatre!</i> you are, and not deserving to be let see the
+ famous letter&mdash;is there any grammar in <i>that</i> concatenation, can you
+ tell me, now that you are in an arch-critical humour? And remember
+ (turning back to the subject) that personally she and I are strangers
+ and that therefore what she writes for me is naturally scene-painting
+ to be looked at from a distance, done with a masterly hand and most
+ amiable intention, but quite a different thing of course from the
+ intimate revelations of heart and mind which make a living thing of a
+ letter. If she had sent such to me, I should not have sent it to Mr.
+ Kenyon, but then, she would not have sent it to me in any case. What
+ she <i>has</i> sent me might be a chapter in a book and has the life proper
+ to itself, and I shall not let you try it by another standard, even if
+ you wished, but you don't&mdash;for I am not so <i>bête</i> as not to understand
+ how the jest crosses the serious all the way you write. Well&mdash;and Mr.
+ Kenyon wants the letter the second time, not for himself, but for Mr.
+ Crabb Robinson who promises to let me have a new sonnet of
+ Wordsworth's in exchange for the loan, and whom I cannot refuse
+ because he is an intimate friend of Miss Martineau's and once allowed
+ me to read a whole packet of letters from her to him. She does not
+ object (as I have read under her hand) to her letters being shown
+ about in MS., notwithstanding the anathema against all printers of the
+ same (which completes the extravagance of the unreason, I think) and
+ people are more anxious to see them from their presumed nearness to
+ annihilation. I, for my part, value letters (to talk literature) as
+ the most vital part of biography, and for any rational human being to
+ put his foot on the traditions of his kind in this particular class,
+ does seem to me as wonderful as possible. Who would put away one of
+ those multitudinous volumes, even, which stereotype Voltaire's
+ wrinkles of wit&mdash;even Voltaire? I can read book after book of such
+ reading&mdash;or could! And if her principle were carried out, there would
+ be an end! Death would be deader from henceforth. Also it is a wrong
+ selfish principle and unworthy of her whole life and profession,
+ because we should all be ready to say that if the secrets of our daily
+ lives and inner souls may instruct other surviving souls, let them be
+ open to men hereafter, even as they are to God now. Dust to dust, and
+ soul-secrets to humanity&mdash;there are natural heirs to all these things.
+ Not that I do not intimately understand the shrinking back from the
+ idea of publicity on any terms&mdash;not that I would not myself destroy
+ papers of mine which were sacred to <i>me</i> for personal reasons&mdash;but
+ then I never would call this natural weakness, virtue&mdash;nor would I, as
+ a teacher of the public, announce it and attempt to justify it as an
+ example to other minds and acts, I hope.
+</p>
+<p>
+ How hard you are on the mending of stockings and the rest of it! Why
+ not agree with me and like that sort of homeliness and simplicity in
+ combination with such large faculty as we must admit <i>there</i>? Lord
+ Bacon did a great deal of trifling besides the stuffing of the fowl
+ you mention&mdash;which I did not remember: and in fact, all the great work
+ done in the world, is done just by the people who know how to
+ trifle&mdash;do you not think so? When a man makes a principle of 'never
+ losing a moment,' he is a lost man. Great men are eager to find an
+ hour, and not to avoid losing a moment. 'What are you doing' said
+ somebody once (as I heard the tradition) to the beautiful Lady Oxford
+ as she sate in her open carriage on the race-ground&mdash;'Only a little
+ algebra,' said she. People who do a little algebra on the race-ground
+ are not likely to do much of anything with ever so many hours for
+ meditation. Why, you must agree with me in all this, so I shall not be
+ sententious any longer. Mending stockings is not exactly the sort of
+ pastime <i>I</i> should choose&mdash;who do things quite as trifling without the
+ utility&mdash;and even your Seigneurie peradventure.... I stop there for
+ fear of growing impertinent. The <i>argumentum ad hominem</i> is apt to
+ bring down the <i>argumentum ad baculum</i>, it is as well to remember in
+ time.
+</p>
+<p>
+ For Wordsworth ... you are right in a measure and by a standard&mdash;but I
+ have heard such really desecrating things of him, of his selfishness,
+ his love of money, his worldly <i>cunning</i> (rather than prudence) that I
+ felt a relief and gladness in the new chronicle;&mdash;and you can
+ understand how <i>that</i> was. Miss Mitford's doctrine is that everything
+ put into the poetry, is taken out of the man and lost utterly by him.
+ Her general doctrine about poets, quite amounts to that&mdash;I do not say
+ it too strongly. And knowing that such opinions are held by minds not
+ feeble, it is very painful (as it would be indeed in any case) to see
+ them apparently justified by royal poets like Wordsworth. Ah, but I
+ know an answer&mdash;I see one in my mind!
+</p>
+<p>
+ So again for the letters. Now ought I not to know about letters, I who
+ have had so many ... from chief minds too, as society goes in England
+ and America? And <i>your</i> letters began by being first to my intellect,
+ before they were first to my heart. All the letters in the world are
+ not like yours ... and I would trust them for that verdict with any
+ jury in Europe, if they were not so far too dear! Mr. Kenyon wanted to
+ make me show him your letters&mdash;I did show him the first, and resisted
+ gallantly afterwards, which made him say what vexed me at the moment,
+ ... 'oh&mdash;you let me see only <i>women's</i> letters,'&mdash;till I observed that
+ it was a breach of confidence, except in some cases, ... and that <i>I</i>
+ should complain very much, if anyone, man or woman, acted so by
+ myself. But nobody in the world writes like you&mdash;not so <i>vitally</i>&mdash;and
+ I have a right, if you please, to praise my letters, besides the
+ reason of it which is as good.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Ah&mdash;you made me laugh about Mr. Chorley's free speaking&mdash;and, without
+ the personal knowledge, I can comprehend how it could be nothing very
+ ferocious ... some 'pardonnez moi, vous êtes un ange.' The amusing
+ part is that by the same post which brought me the Ambleside document,
+ I heard from Miss Mitford 'that it was an admirable thing of Chorley
+ to have persisted in not allowing Harriet Martineau to quarrel with
+ him' ... so that there are laurels on both sides, it appears.
+</p>
+<p>
+ And I am delighted to hear from you to-day just <i>so</i>, though I
+ reproach you in turn just <i>so</i> ... because you were not 'depressed' in
+ writing all this and this and this which has made me laugh&mdash;you were
+ not, dearest&mdash;and you call yourself better, 'much better,' which means
+ a very little perhaps, but is a golden word, let me take it as I may.
+ May God bless you. Wednesday seems too near (now that this is Monday
+ and you are better) to be <i>our</i> day ... perhaps it does,&mdash;and Thursday
+ <i>is</i> close beside it at the worst.
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">Dearest I am your own</p>
+<p style="text-align: right"><SPAN class="sc-ex">Ba</span>.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>E.B.B. to R.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Monday Evening.<br>
+[In the same envelope with the preceding letter.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ Now forgive me, dearest of all, but I must teaze you just a little,
+ and entreat you, if only for the love of me, to have medical advice
+ and follow it <i>without further delay</i>. I like to have recourse to
+ these medical people quite as little as you can&mdash;but I am persuaded
+ that it is necessary&mdash;that it is at least <i>wise</i>, for you to do so
+ now, and, you see, you were 'not quite so well' again last night! So
+ will you, for me? Would <i>I</i> not, if you wished it? And on Wednesday,
+ yes, on Wednesday, come&mdash;that is, if coming on Wednesday should really
+ be not bad for you, for you <i>must</i> do what is right and kind, and I
+ doubt whether the omnibus-driving and the noises of every sort betwixt
+ us, should not keep you away for a little while&mdash;I trust you to do
+ what is best for both of us.
+</p>
+<p>
+ And it is not best ... it is not good even, to talk about 'dying for
+ me' ... oh, I do beseech you never to use such words. You make me feel
+ as if I were choking. Also it is nonsense&mdash;because nobody puts out a
+ candle for the light's sake.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Write <i>one line</i> to me to-morrow&mdash;literally so little&mdash;just to say how
+ you are. I know by the writing here, what <i>is</i>. Let me have the one
+ line by the eight o'clock post to-morrow, Tuesday.
+</p>
+<p>
+ For the rest it may be my 'goodness' or my badness, but the world
+ seems to have sunk away beneath my feet and to have left only you to
+ look to and hold by. Am I not to <i>feel</i>, then, any trembling of the
+ hand? the least trembling?
+</p>
+<p>
+ May God bless both of us&mdash;which is a double blessing for me
+ notwithstanding my badness.
+</p>
+<p>
+ <i>I trust you about Wednesday</i>&mdash;and if it should be wise and kind not
+ to come quite so soon, we will take it out of other days and lose not
+ one of them. And as for anything 'horrible' being likely to happen, do
+ not think of that either,&mdash;there can be nothing horrible while you are
+ not ill. So be well&mdash;try to be well&mdash;use the means and, well or ill,
+ let me have the one line to-morrow ... Tuesday. I send you the foolish
+ letter I wrote to-day in answer to your too long one&mdash;too long, was it
+ not, as you felt? And I, the writer of the foolish one, am
+ twice-foolish, and push poor 'Luria' out of sight, and refuse to
+ finish my notes on him till the harm he has done shall have passed
+ away. In my badness I bring false accusation, perhaps, against poor
+ Luria.
+</p>
+<p>
+ So till Wednesday&mdash;or as you shall fix otherwise.
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">Your</p>
+<p style="text-align: right"><SPAN class="sc-ex">Ba</span>.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>R.B. to E.B.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">6-1/2 Tuesday Evening.
+</p>
+<p>
+ My dearest, your note reaches me only <i>now</i>, with an excuse from the
+ postman. The answer you expect, you shall have the only way possible.
+ I must make up a parcel so as to be able to knock and give it. I shall
+ be with you to-morrow, God willing&mdash;being quite well.
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">Bless you ever&mdash;
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>R.B. to E.B.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Thursday Morning.<br>
+[Post-mark, February 19, 1846.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ My sweetest, best, dearest Ba I <i>do</i> love you less, much less already,
+ and adore you more, more by so much more as I see of you, think of
+ you&mdash;I am yours just as much as those flowers; and you may pluck those
+ flowers to pieces or put them in your breast; it is not because you so
+ bless me now that you may not if you please one day&mdash;you will stop me
+ here; but it is the truth and I live in it.
+</p>
+<p>
+ I am quite well; indeed, this morning, <i>noticeably</i> well, they tell
+ me, and well I mean to keep if I can.
+</p>
+<p>
+ When I got home last evening I found this note&mdash;and I have <i>accepted</i>,
+ that I might say I could also keep an engagement, if so minded, at
+ Harley Street&mdash;thereby insinuating that other reasons <i>may</i> bring me
+ into the neighbourhood than <i>the</i> reason&mdash;but I shall either not go
+ there, or only for an hour at most. I also found a note headed
+ 'Strictly private and confidential'&mdash;so here it goes from my mouth to
+ my heart&mdash;pleasantly proposing that I should start in a few days for
+ St. Petersburg, as secretary to somebody going there on a 'mission of
+ humanity'&mdash;<i>grazie tante</i>!
+</p>
+<p>
+ Did you hear of my meeting someone at the door whom I take to have
+ been one of your brothers?
+</p>
+<p>
+ One thing vexed me in your letter&mdash;I will tell you, the praise of
+ <i>my</i> letters. Now, one merit they have&mdash;in language mystical&mdash;that of
+ having <i>no</i> merit. If I caught myself trying to write finely,
+ graphically &amp;c. &amp;c., nay, if I found myself conscious of having in my
+ own opinion, so written, all would be over! yes, over! I should be
+ respecting you inordinately, paying a proper tribute to your genius,
+ summoning the necessary collectedness,&mdash;plenty of all that! But the
+ feeling with which I write to you, not knowing that it is
+ writing,&mdash;with <i>you</i>, face and mouth and hair and eyes opposite me,
+ touching me, knowing that all <i>is</i> as I say, and helping out the
+ imperfect phrases from your own intuition&mdash;<i>that</i> would be gone&mdash;and
+ <i>what</i> in its place? 'Let us eat and drink for to-morrow we write to
+ Ambleside.' No, no, love, nor can it ever be so, nor should it ever be
+ so if&mdash;even if, preserving all that intimate relation, with the
+ carelessness, <i>still</i>, somehow, was obtained with no effort in the
+ world, graphic writing and philosophic and what you please&mdash;for I
+ <i>will</i> be&mdash;<i>would</i> be, better than my works and words with an infinite
+ stock beyond what I put into convenient circulation whether in fine
+ speeches fit to remember, or fine passages to quote. For the rest, I
+ had meant to tell you before now, that you often put me 'in a maze'
+ when you particularize letters of mine&mdash;'such an one was kind' &amp;c. I
+ know, sometimes I seem to give the matter up in despair, I take out
+ paper and fall thinking on you, and bless you with my whole heart and
+ then begin: 'What a fine day this is?' I distinctly remember having
+ done that repeatedly&mdash;but the converse is not true by any means, that
+ (when the expression may happen to fall more consentaneously to the
+ mind's motion) that less is felt, oh no! But the particular thought at
+ the time has not been of the <i>insufficiency</i> of expression, as in the
+ other instance.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Now I will leave off&mdash;to begin elsewhere&mdash;for I am always with you,
+ beloved, best beloved! Now you will write? And walk much, and sleep
+ more? Bless you, dearest&mdash;ever&mdash;
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">Your own,
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>E.B.B. to R.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">[Post-marks, Mis-sent to Mitcham. February 19 and 20, 1846.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ Best and kindest of all that ever were to be loved in dreams, and
+ wondered at and loved out of them, you are indeed! I cannot make you
+ feel how I felt that night when I knew that to save me an anxious
+ thought you had come so far so late&mdash;it was almost too much to feel,
+ and <i>is</i> too much to speak. So let it pass. You will never act so
+ again, ever dearest&mdash;you shall not. If the post sins, why leave the
+ sin to the post; and I will remember for the future, will be ready to
+ remember, how postmen are fallible and how you live at the end of a
+ lane&mdash;and not be uneasy about a silence if there should be one
+ unaccounted for. For the Tuesday coming, I shall remember that
+ too&mdash;who could forget it?... I put it in the niche of the wall, one
+ golden lamp more of your giving, to throw light purely down to the end
+ of my life&mdash;I do thank you. And the truth is, I <i>should</i> have been in
+ a panic, had there been no letter that evening&mdash;I was frightened the
+ day before, then reasoned the fears back and waited: and if there had
+ been no letter after all&mdash;. But you are supernaturally good and kind.
+ How can I ever 'return' as people say (as they might say in their
+ ledgers) ... any of it all? How indeed can I who have not even a heart
+ left of my own, to love you with?
+</p>
+<p>
+ I quite trust to your promise in respect to the medical advice, if
+ walking and rest from work do not prevent at once the recurrence of
+ those sensations&mdash;it was a promise, remember. And you will tell me the
+ very truth of how you are&mdash;and you will try the music, and not be
+ nervous, dearest. Would not <i>riding</i> be good for you&mdash;consider. And
+ why should you be 'alone' when your sister is in the house? How I keep
+ thinking of you all day&mdash;you cannot really be alone with so many
+ thoughts ... such swarms of thoughts, if you could but see them,
+ drones and bees together!
+</p>
+<p>
+ George came in from Westminster Hall after we parted yesterday and
+ said that he had talked with the junior counsel of the wretched
+ plaintiffs in the Ferrers case, and that the belief was in the mother
+ being implicated, although not from the beginning. It was believed too
+ that the miserable girl had herself taken step after step into the
+ mire, involved herself gradually, the first guilt being an
+ extravagance in personal expenses, which she lied and lied to account
+ for in the face of her family. 'Such a respectable family,' said
+ George, 'the grandfather in court looking venerable, and everyone
+ indignant upon being so disgraced by her!' But for the respectability
+ in the best sense, I do not quite see. That all those people should
+ acquiesce in the indecency (according to every standard of English
+ manners in any class of society) of thrusting the personal expenses of
+ a member of their family on Lord Ferrers, she still bearing their
+ name&mdash;and in those peculiar circumstances of her supposed position
+ too&mdash;where is the respectability? And they are furious with her, which
+ is not to be wondered at after all. Her counsel had an interview with
+ her previous to the trial, to satisfy themselves of her good faith,
+ and she was quite resolute and earnest, persisting in every statement.
+ On the coming out of the anonymous letters, Fitzroy Kelly said to the
+ juniors that if anyone could suggest a means of explanation, he would
+ be eager to carry forward the case, ... but for him he saw no way of
+ escaping from the fact of the guilt of their client. Not a voice could
+ speak for her. So George was told. There is no ground for a
+ prosecution for a conspiracy, he says, but she is open to the charge
+ for <i>forgery</i>, of course, and to the dreadful consequences, though it
+ is not considered at all likely that Lord Ferrers could wish to
+ disturb her beyond the ruin she has brought on her own life.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Think of Miss Mitford's growing quite cold about Mr. Chorley who has
+ spent two days with her lately, and of her saying in a letter to me
+ this morning that he is very much changed and grown to be 'a
+ presumptuous coxcomb.' He has displeased her in some way&mdash;that is
+ clear. What changes there are in the world.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Should I ever change to <i>you</i>, do you think, ... even if you came to
+ 'love me less'&mdash;not that I meant to reproach you with that
+ possibility. May God bless you, dear dearest. It is another miracle
+ (beside the many) that I get nearer to the mountains yet still they
+ seem more blue. Is not <i>that</i> strange?
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">Ever and wholly</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">Your <SPAN class="sc-ex">Ba</span>.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>E.B.B. to R.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Thursday Evening.<br>
+[Post-mark, February 20, 1846.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ And I offended you by praising your letters&mdash;or rather <i>mine</i>, if you
+ please&mdash;as if I had not the right! Still, you shall not, shall not
+ fancy that I meant to praise them in the way you seem to think&mdash;by
+ calling them 'graphic,' 'philosophic,'&mdash;why, did I ever use such
+ words? I agree with you that if I could play critic upon your letters,
+ it would be an end!&mdash;but no, no ... I did not, for a moment. In what I
+ said I went back to my first impressions&mdash;and they were <i>vital</i>
+ letters, I said&mdash;which was the résumé of my thoughts upon the early
+ ones you sent me, because I felt your letters to be <i>you</i> from the
+ very first, and I began, from the beginning, to read every one several
+ times over. Nobody, I felt, nobody of all these writers, did write as
+ you did. Well!&mdash;and had I not a right to say <i>that</i> now at last, and
+ was it not natural to say just <i>that</i>, when I was talking of other
+ people's letters and how it had grown almost impossible for me to read
+ them; and do I deserve to be scolded? No indeed.
+</p>
+<p>
+ And if I had the misfortune to think now, when you say it is a fine
+ day, that <i>that</i> is said in more music than it could be said in by
+ another&mdash;where is the sin against <i>you</i>, I should like to ask. It is
+ yourself who is the critic, I think, after all. But over all the
+ brine, I hold my letters&mdash;just as Camoens did his poem. They are <i>best
+ to me</i>&mdash;and they are <i>best</i>. I knew what <i>they</i> were, before I knew
+ what <i>you</i> were&mdash;all of you. And I like to think that I never fancied
+ anyone on a level with you, even in a letter.
+</p>
+<p>
+ What makes you take them to be so bad, I suppose, is just feeling in
+ them how near we are. <i>You say that!</i>&mdash;not I.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Bad or good, you <i>are</i> better&mdash;yes, 'better than the works and
+ words'!&mdash;though it was very shameful of you to insinuate that I talked
+ of fine speeches and passages and graphical and philosophical
+ sentences, as if I had proposed a publication of 'Elegant Extracts'
+ from your letters. See what blasphemy one falls into through a
+ beginning of light speech! It is wiser to talk of St. Petersburg; for
+ all Voltaire's ... '<i>ne disons pas de mal de Nicolas</i>.'
+</p>
+<p>
+ Wiser&mdash;because you will not go. If you were going ... well!&mdash;but there
+ is no danger&mdash;it would not do you good to go, I am so happy this time
+ as to be able to think&mdash;and your 'mission of humanity' lies
+ nearer&mdash;'strictly private and confidential'? but not in Harley
+ Street&mdash;so if you go <i>there</i>, dearest, keep to the 'one hour' and do
+ not suffer yourself to be tired and stunned in those hot rooms and
+ made unwell again&mdash;it is plain that you cannot bear that sort of
+ excitement. For Mr. Kenyon's note, ... it was a great temptation to
+ make a day of Friday&mdash;but I resist both for Monday's sake and for
+ yours, because it seems to me safer not to hurry you from one house to
+ another till you are tired completely. I shall think of you so much
+ the nearer for Mr. Kenyon's note&mdash;which is something gained. In the
+ meanwhile you are better, which is everything, or seems so. Ever
+ dearest, do you remember what it is to me that you should be better,
+ and keep from being worse again&mdash;I mean, of course, <i>try</i> to keep from
+ being worse&mdash;be wise ... and do not stay long in those hot Harley
+ Street rooms. Ah&mdash;now you will think that I am afraid of the
+ unicorns!&mdash;
+</p>
+<p>
+ Through your being ill the other day I forgot, and afterwards went on
+ forgetting, to speak of and to return the ballad&mdash;which is delightful;
+ I have an unspeakable delight in those suggestive ballads, which seem
+ to make you touch with the end of your finger the full warm life of
+ other times ... so near they bring you, yet so suddenly all passes in
+ them. Certainly there is a likeness to your Duchess&mdash;it is a curious
+ crossing. And does it not strike you that a verse or two must be
+ wanting in the ballad&mdash;there is a gap, I fancy.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Tell Mr. Kenyon (if he enquires) that you come here on Monday instead
+ of Saturday&mdash;and if you can help it, do not mention Wednesday&mdash;it will
+ be as well, not. You met Alfred at the door&mdash;he came up to me
+ afterwards and observed that 'at last he had seen you!' 'Virgilium
+ tantum vidi!'
+</p>
+<p>
+ As to the thing which you try to say in the first page of this letter,
+ and which you 'stop' yourself in saying ... <i>I</i> need not stop you in
+ it....
+</p>
+<p>
+ And now there is no time, if I am to sleep to-night. May God bless
+ you, dearest, dearest.
+</p>
+<p>
+ I must be your own while He blesses <i>me</i>.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>R.B. to E.B.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Friday Afternoon.<br>
+[Post-mark, February 20, 1846.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ Here is my Ba's dearest <i>first</i> letter come four hours after the
+ second, with '<i>Mis-sent to Mitcham</i>' written on its face as a
+ reason,&mdash;one more proof of the negligence of somebody! But I <i>do</i> have
+ it at last&mdash;what should I say? what do you expect me to say? And the
+ first note seemed quite as much too kind as usual!
+</p>
+<p>
+ Let me write to-morrow, sweet? I am quite well and sure to mind all
+ you bid me. I shall do no more than look in at that place (they are
+ the cousins of a really good friend of mine, Dr. White&mdash;I go for
+ <i>him</i>) if even that&mdash;for to-morrow night I must go out again, I
+ fear&mdash;to pay the ordinary compliment for an invitation to the R.S.'s
+ <i>soirée</i> at Lord Northampton's. And then comes Monday&mdash;and to-night
+ any unicorn I may see I will not find myself at liberty to catch.
+ (N.B.&mdash;should you meditate really an addition to the 'Elegant
+ Extracts'&mdash;mind this last joke is none of mine but my father's; when
+ walking with me when a child, I remember, he bade a little urchin we
+ found fishing with a stick and a string for sticklebacks in a
+ ditch&mdash;'to mind that he brought any sturgeon he might catch to the
+ king'&mdash;he having a claim on such a prize, by courtesy if not right).
+</p>
+<p>
+ As for Chorley, he is neither the one nor the other of those ugly
+ things. One remembers Regan's 'Oh Heaven&mdash;so you will rail at <i>me</i>,
+ when you are in the mood.' But what a want of self-respect such
+ judgments argue, or rather, want of knowledge what true self-respect
+ is: 'So I believed yesterday, and <i>so</i> now&mdash;and yet am neither hasty,
+ nor inapprehensive, nor malevolent'&mdash;what then?
+</p>
+<p>
+ &mdash;But I will say more of my mind&mdash;(not of that)&mdash;to-morrow, for time
+ presses a little&mdash;so bless you my ever ever dearest&mdash;I love you
+ wholly.
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">R.B.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>E.B.B. to R.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Friday Morning.<br>
+[Post-mark, February 21, 1846.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ As my sisters did not dine at home yesterday and I see nobody else in
+ the evening, I never heard till just now and <i>from Papa himself</i>, that
+ 'George was invited to meet Mr. Browning and Mr. Procter.' How
+ surprised you will be. It must have been a sudden thought of Mr.
+ Kenyon's.
+</p>
+<p>
+ And I have been thinking, thinking since last night that I wrote you
+ then a letter all but ... insolent ... which, do you know, I feel half
+ ashamed to look back upon this morning&mdash;particularly what I wrote
+ about 'missions of humanity'&mdash;now was it not insolent of me to write
+ so? If I could take my letter again I would dip it into Lethe between
+ the lilies, instead of the post office:&mdash;but I can't&mdash;so if you
+ wondered, you must forget as far as possible, and understand how it
+ was, and that I was in brimming spirits when I wrote, from two causes
+ ... first, because I had your letter which was a pure goodness of
+ yours, and secondly because you were 'noticeably' better you said, or
+ 'noticeably well' rather, to mind my quotations. So I wrote what I
+ wrote, and gave it to Arabel when she came in at midnight, to give it
+ to Henrietta who goes out before eight in the morning and often takes
+ charge of my letters, and it was too late, at the earliest this
+ morning, to feel a little ashamed. Miss Thomson told me that she had
+ determined to change the type of the few pages of her letterpress
+ which had been touched, and that therefore Mr. Burges's revisions of
+ my translations should be revised back again. She appears to be a very
+ acute person, full of quick perceptions&mdash;naturally quick, and
+ carefully trained&mdash;a little over anxious perhaps about mental lights,
+ and opening her eyes still more than she sees, which is a common fault
+ of clever people, if one must call it a fault. I like her, and she is
+ kind and cordial. Will she ask you to help her book with a translation
+ or two, I wonder. Perhaps&mdash;if the courage should come. Dearest, how I
+ shall think of you this evening, and how near you will seem, not to be
+ here. I had a letter from Mr. Mathews the other day, and smiled to
+ read in it just what I had expected, that he immediately sent Landor's
+ verses on you to a <i>few editors</i>, friends of his, in order to their
+ communication to the public. He received my apology for myself with
+ the utmost graciousness. A kind good man he is.
+</p>
+<p>
+ After all, do you know, I am a little vexed that I should have even
+ <i>seemed</i> to do wrong in my speech about the letters. It must have been
+ wrong, if it seemed so to you, I fancy now. Only I really did no more
+ mean to try your letters ... mine ... such as they are to me now, by
+ the common critical measure, than the shepherds praised the pure tenor
+ of the angels who sang 'Peace upon earth' to them. It was enough that
+ they knew it for angels' singing. So do <i>you</i> forgive me, beloved, and
+ put away from you the thought that I have let in between us any
+ miserable stuff 'de métier,' which I hate as you hate. And I will not
+ say any more about it, not to run into more imprudences of mischief.
+</p>
+<p>
+ On the other hand I warn you against saying again what you began to
+ say yesterday and stopped. Do not try it again. What may be quite good
+ sense from me, is from <i>you</i> very much the reverse, and pray observe
+ that difference. Or did you think that I was making my own road clear
+ in the the thing I said about&mdash;'jilts'? No, you did not. Yet I am
+ ready to repeat of myself as of others, that if I ceased to love you,
+ I certainly would act out the whole consequence&mdash;but <i>that</i> is an
+ impossible 'if' to my nature, supposing the conditions of it otherwise
+ to be probable. I never loved anyone much and ceased to love that
+ person. Ask every friend of mine, if I am given to change even in
+ friendship! <i>And to you...!</i> Ah, but you never think of such a thing
+ seriously&mdash;and you are conscious that you did not say it very sagely.
+ You and I are in different positions. Now let me tell you an apologue
+ in exchange for your Wednesday's stories which I liked so, and mine
+ perhaps may make you 'a little wiser'&mdash;who knows?
+</p>
+<p>
+ It befell that there stood in hall a bold baron, and out he spake to
+ one of his serfs ... 'Come thou; and take this baton of my baronie,
+ and give me instead thereof that sprig of hawthorn thou holdest in
+ thine hand.' Now the hawthorn-bough was no larger a thing than might
+ be carried by a wood-pigeon to the nest, when she flieth low, and the
+ baronial baton was covered with fine gold, and the serf, turning it
+ in his hands, marvelled greatly.
+</p>
+<p>
+ And he answered and said, 'Let not my lord be in haste, nor jest with
+ his servant. Is it verily his will that I should keep his golden
+ baton? Let him speak again&mdash;lest it repent him of his gift.'
+</p>
+<p>
+ And the baron spake again that it was his will. 'And I'&mdash;he said once
+ again&mdash;'shall it be lawful for me to keep this sprig of hawthorn, and
+ will it not repent thee of thy gift?'
+</p>
+<p>
+ Then all the servants who stood in hall, laughed, and the serf's hands
+ trembled till they dropped the baton into the rushes, knowing that his
+ lord did but jest....
+</p>
+<p>
+ Which mine did not. Only, <i>de te fabula narratur</i> up to a point.
+</p>
+<p>
+ And I have your letter. 'What did I expect?' Why I expected just
+ <i>that</i>, a letter in turn. Also I am graciously pleased (yes, and very
+ much pleased!) to '<i>let</i> you write to-morrow.' How you spoil me with
+ goodness, which makes one 'insolent' as I was saying, now and then.
+</p>
+<p>
+ The worst is, that I write 'too kind' letters&mdash;I!&mdash;and what does that
+ criticism mean, pray? It reminds me, at least, of ... now I will tell
+ you what it reminds me of.
+</p>
+<p>
+ A few days ago Henrietta said to me that she was quite uncomfortable.
+ She had written to somebody a not kind enough letter, she thought, and
+ it might be taken ill. 'Are <i>you</i> ever uncomfortable, Ba, after you
+ have sent letters to the post?' she asked me.
+</p>
+<p>
+ 'Yes,' I said, 'sometimes, but from a reason just the very reverse of
+ your reason, <i>my</i> letters, when they get into the post, seem too
+ kind,&mdash;rather.' And my sisters laughed ... laughed.
+</p>
+<p>
+ But if <i>you</i> think so beside, I must seriously set to work, you see,
+ to correct that flagrant fault, and shall do better in time <i>dis
+ faventibus</i>, though it will be difficult.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Mr. Kenyon's dinner is a riddle which I cannot read. <i>You</i> are
+ invited to meet Miss Thomson and Mr. Bayley and '<i>no one else</i>.'
+ George is invited to meet Mr. Browning and Mr. Procter and '<i>no one
+ else</i>'&mdash;just those words. The '<i>absolu</i>' (do you remember Balzac's
+ beautiful story?) is just <i>you</i> and 'no one else,' the other elements
+ being mere uncertainties, shifting while one looks for them.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Am I not writing nonsense to-night? I am not 'too <i>wise</i>' in any case,
+ which is some comfort. It puts one in spirits to hear of your being
+ 'well,' ever and ever dearest. Keep so for <i>me</i>. May God bless you
+ hour by hour. In every one of mine I am your own
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right"><SPAN class="sc-ex">Ba</span>.
+</p>
+<p>
+ For Miss Mitford ...
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: center">But people are not angels quite ...
+</p>
+<p style="text-indent: 0em">and she sees the whole world in stripes of black and white, it is her
+ way. I feel very affectionately towards her, love her sincerely. She
+ is affectionate to <i>me</i> beyond measure. Still, always I feel that if I
+ were to vex her, the lower deep below the lowest deep would not be low
+ enough for <i>me</i>. I always feel <i>that</i>. She would advertise me directly
+ for a wretch proper.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Then, for all I said about never changing, I have ice enough over me
+ just now to hold the sparrows!&mdash;in respect to a great crowd of people,
+ and she is among them&mdash;for reasons&mdash;for reasons.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>R.B. to E.B.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Saturday Morning.<br>
+[Post-mark, February 23, 1846.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ So all was altered, my love&mdash;and, instead of Miss T. and the other
+ friend, I had your brother and Procter&mdash;to my great pleasure. After, I
+ went to that place, and soon got away, and am very well this morning
+ in the sunshine; which I feel with you, do I not? Yesterday after
+ dinner we spoke of Mrs. Jameson, and, as my wont is&mdash;(Here your letter
+ reaches me&mdash;let me finish this sentence now I have finished kissing
+ you, dearest beyond all dearness&mdash;My own heart's Ba!)&mdash;oh, as I am
+ used, I left the talking to go on by itself, with the thought busied
+ elsewhere, till at last my own voice startled me for I heard my tongue
+ utter 'Miss Barrett ... that is, Mrs. Jameson says' ... or 'does ...
+ or does not.' I forget which! And if anybody noticed the <i>gaucherie</i>
+ it must have been just your brother!
+</p>
+<p>
+ Now to these letters! I do solemnly, unaffectedly wonder how you can
+ put so much pure felicity into an envelope so as that I shall get it
+ as from the fount head. This to-day, those yesterday&mdash;there is, I see,
+ and know, thus much goodness in line after line, goodness to be
+ scientifically appreciated, <i>proved there</i>&mdash;but over and above, is it
+ in the writing, the dots and traces, the seal, the paper&mdash;here does
+ the subtle charm lie beyond all rational accounting for? The other day
+ I stumbled on a quotation from J. Baptista Porta&mdash;wherein he avers
+ that any musical instrument made out of wood possessed of medicinal
+ properties retains, being put to use, such virtues undiminished,&mdash;and
+ that, for instance, a sick man to whom you should pipe on a pipe of
+ elder-tree would so receive all the advantage derivable from a
+ decoction of its berries. From whence, by a parity of reasoning, I may
+ discover, I think, that the very ink and paper were&mdash;ah, what were
+ they? Curious thinking won't do for me and the wise head which is
+ mine, so I will lie and rest in my ignorance of content and understand
+ that without any magic at all you simply wish to make one
+ person&mdash;which of your free goodness proves to be your R.B.&mdash;to make me
+ supremely happy, and that you have your wish&mdash;you <i>do</i> bless me! More
+ and more, for the old treasure is piled undiminished and still the new
+ comes glittering in. Dear, dear heart of my heart, life of my life,
+ <i>will this last</i>, let <i>me</i> begin to ask? Can it be meant I shall live
+ this to the end? Then, dearest, care also for the life beyond, and put
+ in my mind how to testify here that I have felt, if I could not
+ deserve that a gift beyond all gifts! I hope to work hard, to prove I
+ do feel, as I say&mdash;it would be terrible to accomplish nothing now.
+</p>
+<p>
+ With which conviction&mdash;renewed conviction time by time, of your
+ extravagance of kindness to me unworthy,&mdash;will it seem
+ characteristically consistent when I pray you not to begin frightening
+ me, all the same, with threats of writing <i>less</i> kindly? That must not
+ be, love, for <i>your</i> sake now&mdash;if you had not thrown open those
+ windows of heaven I should have no more imagined than that Syrian lord
+ on whom the King leaned 'how such things might be'&mdash;but, once their
+ influence showered, I should know, too soon and easily, if they shut
+ up again! You have committed your dear, dearest self to that course of
+ blessing, and blessing on, on, for ever&mdash;so let all be as it is, pray,
+ <i>pray</i>!
+</p>
+<p>
+ No&mdash;not <i>all</i>. No more, ever, of that strange
+ suspicion&mdash;'insolent'&mdash;oh, what a word!&mdash;nor suppose I shall
+ particularly wonder at its being fancied applicable to <i>that</i>, of all
+ other passages of your letter! It is quite as reasonable to suspect
+ the existence of such a quality <i>there</i> as elsewhere: how <i>can</i> such a
+ thing, <i>could</i> such a thing come from you to me? But, dear Ba, <i>do</i>
+ you know me better! <i>Do</i> feel that I know you, I am bold to believe,
+ and that if you were to run at me with a pointed spear I should be
+ sure it was a golden sanative, Machaon's touch, for my entire good,
+ that I was opening my heart to receive! As for words, written or
+ spoken&mdash;I, who sin forty times in a day by light words, and untrue to
+ the thought, I am certainly not used to be easily offended by other
+ peoples' words, people in the world. But <i>your</i> words! And about the
+ 'mission'; if it had not been a thing to jest at, I should not have
+ begun, as I did&mdash;as you felt I did. I know now, what I only suspected
+ then, and will tell you all the matter on Monday if you care to hear.
+ The 'humanity' however, would have been unquestionable if I had chosen
+ to exercise it towards the poor weak incapable creature that wants
+ <i>somebody</i>, and urgently, I can well believe.
+</p>
+<p>
+ As for your apologue, it is naught&mdash;as you felt, and so broke off&mdash;for
+ the baron knew well enough it was a spray of the magical tree which
+ once planted in his domain would shoot up, and out, and all round, and
+ be glorious with leaves and musical with birds' nests, and a fairy
+ safeguard and blessing thenceforward and for ever, when the foolish
+ baton had been broken into ounces of gold, even if gold it <i>were</i>, and
+ spent and vanished: for, he said, such gold lies in the highway, men
+ pick it up, more of it or less; but this one slip of the flowering
+ tree is all of it on this side Paradise. Whereon he laid it to his
+ heart and was happy&mdash;in spite of his disastrous chase the night
+ before, when so far from catching an unicorn, he saw not even a
+ respectable prize-heifer, worth the oil-cake and rape-seed it had
+ doubtless cost to rear her&mdash;'insolence!'
+</p>
+<p>
+ I found no opportunity of speaking to Mr. K. about Monday, but nothing
+ was said of last Wednesday, and he must know I did not go yesterday.
+ So, Monday is laughing in sunshine surely! Bless you, my sweetest. I
+ love you with my whole heart; ever shall love you.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>E.B.B. to R.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">[Post-mark, February 24, 1846.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ Ever dearest, it is only when you go away, when you are quite gone,
+ out of the house and the street, that I get up and think properly, and
+ with the right gratitude of your flowers. Such beautiful flowers you
+ brought me this time too! looking like summer itself, and smelling!
+ Doing the 'honour due' to the flowers, makes your presence a little
+ longer with me, the sun shines back over the hill just by that time,
+ and then drops, till the next letter.
+</p>
+<p>
+ If I had had the letter on Saturday as ought to have been, no, I could
+ <i>not</i> have answered it so that you should have my answer on
+ Sunday&mdash;no, I should still have had to write first.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Now you understand that I do not object to the writing first, but only
+ to the hearing second. I would rather write than not&mdash;I! But to be
+ written to is the chief gladness of course; and with all you say of
+ liking to have my letters (which I like to hear quite enough indeed)
+ you cannot pretend to think that <i>yours</i> are not more to <i>me</i>, most to
+ <i>me</i>! Ask my guardian-angel and hear what he says! Yours will look
+ another way for shame of measuring joys with him! Because as I have
+ said before, and as he says now, you are all to me, all the light, all
+ the life; I am living for you now. And before I knew you, what was I
+ and where? What was the world to me, do you think? and the meaning of
+ life? And now, when you come and go, and write and do not write, all
+ the hours are chequered accordingly in so many squares of white and
+ black, as if for playing at fox and goose ... only there is no fox,
+ and I will not agree to be goose for one ... <i>that</i> is <i>you</i> perhaps,
+ for being 'too easily' satisfied.
+</p>
+<p>
+ So my claim is that you are more to me than I can be to you at any
+ rate. Mr. Fox said on Sunday that I was a 'religious hermit' who wrote
+ 'poems which ought to be read in a Gothic alcove'; and religious
+ hermits, when they care to see visions, do it better, they all say,
+ through fasting and flagellation and seclusion in dark places. St.
+ Theresa, for instance, saw a clearer glory by such means, than your
+ Sir Moses Montefiore through his hundred-guinea telescope. Think then,
+ how every shadow of my life has helped to throw out into brighter,
+ fuller significance, the light which comes to me from you ... think
+ how it is the one light, seen without distractions.
+</p>
+<p>
+ <i>I</i> was thinking the other day that certainly and after all (or rather
+ before all) I had loved you all my life unawares, that is, the idea of
+ you. Women begin for the most part, (if ever so very little given to
+ reverie) by meaning, in an aside to themselves, to love such and such
+ an ideal, seen sometimes in a dream and sometimes in a book, and
+ forswearing their ancient faith as the years creep on. I say a book,
+ because I remember a friend of mine who looked everywhere for the
+ original of Mr. Ward's 'Tremaine,' because nothing would do for <i>her</i>,
+ she insisted, except just <i>that</i> excess of so-called refinement, with
+ the book-knowledge and the conventional manners, (<i>loue qui peut</i>,
+ Tremaine), and ended by marrying a lieutenant in the Navy who could
+ not spell. Such things happen every day, and cannot be otherwise, say
+ the wise:&mdash;and <i>this</i> being otherwise with <i>me</i> is miraculous
+ compensation for the trials of many years, though such abundant,
+ overabundant compensation, that I cannot help fearing it is too much,
+ as I know that you are too good and too high for me, and that by the
+ degree in which I am raised up you are let down, for us two to find a
+ level to meet on. One's ideal must be above one, as a matter of
+ course, you know. It is as far as one can reach with one's eyes
+ (soul-eyes), not reach to touch. And here is mine ... shall I tell
+ you? ... even to the visible outward sign of the black hair and the
+ complexion (why you might ask my sisters!) yet I would not tell you,
+ if I could not tell you afterwards that, if it had been red hair
+ quite, it had been the same thing, only I prove the coincidence out
+ fully and make you smile half.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Yet indeed I did not fancy that I was to love <i>you</i> when you came to
+ see me&mdash;no indeed ... any more than I did your caring on your side. My
+ ambition when we began our correspondence, was simply that you should
+ forget I was a woman (being weary and <i>blasée</i> of the empty written
+ gallantries, of which I have had my share and all the more perhaps
+ from my peculiar position which made them so without consequence),
+ that you should forget <i>that</i> and let us be friends, and consent to
+ teach me what you knew better than I, in art and human nature, and
+ give me your sympathy in the meanwhile. I am a great hero-worshipper
+ and had admired your poetry for years, and to feel that you liked to
+ write to me and be written to was a pleasure and a pride, as I used
+ to tell you I am sure, and then your letters were not like other
+ letters, as I must not tell you again. Also you <i>influenced</i> me, in a
+ way in which no one else did. For instance, by two or three half words
+ you made me see you, and other people had delivered orations on the
+ same subject quite without effect. I surprised everybody in this house
+ by consenting to see you. Then, when you came, you never went away. I
+ mean I had a sense of your presence constantly. Yes ... and to prove
+ how free that feeling was from the remotest presentiment of what has
+ occurred, I said to Papa in my unconsciousness the next morning ...
+ 'it is most extraordinary how the idea of Mr. Browning does beset
+ me&mdash;I suppose it is not being used to see strangers, in some
+ degree&mdash;but it haunts me ... it is a persecution.' On which he smiled
+ and said that 'it was not grateful to my friend to use such a word.'
+ When the letter came....
+</p>
+<p>
+ Do you know that all that time I was frightened of you? frightened in
+ this way. I felt as if you had a power over me and meant to use it,
+ and that I could not breathe or speak very differently from what you
+ chose to make me. As to my thoughts, I had it in my head somehow that
+ you read <i>them</i> as you read the newspaper&mdash;examined them, and fastened
+ them down writhing under your long entomological pins&mdash;ah, do you
+ remember the entomology of it all?
+</p>
+<p>
+ But the power was used upon <i>me</i>&mdash;and I never doubted that you had
+ mistaken your own mind, the strongest of us having some exceptional
+ weakness. Turning the wonder round in all lights, I came to what you
+ admitted yesterday ... yes, I saw <i>that</i> very early ... that you had
+ come here with the intention of trying to love whomever you should
+ find, ... and also that what I had said about exaggerating the amount
+ of what I could be to you, had just operated in making you more
+ determined to justify your own presentiment in the face of mine.
+ Well&mdash;and if that last clause was true a little, too ... why should I
+ be sorry now ... and why should you have fancied for a moment, that
+ the first could make me sorry. At first and when I did not believe
+ that you really loved me, when I thought you deceived yourself,
+ <i>then</i>, it was different. But now ... now ... when I see and believe
+ your attachment for me, do you think that any cause in the world
+ (except what diminished it) could render it less a source of joy to
+ me? I mean as far as I myself am considered. Now if you ever fancy
+ that I am <i>vain</i> of your love for me, you will be unjust, remember. If
+ it were less dear, and less above me, I might be vain perhaps. But I
+ may say <i>before</i> God and you, that of all the events of my life,
+ inclusive of its afflictions, nothing has humbled me so much as your
+ love. Right or wrong it may be, but true it <i>is</i>, and I tell you. Your
+ love has been to me like God's own love, which makes the receivers of
+ it kneelers.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Why all this should be written, I do not know&mdash;but you set me thinking
+ yesterday in that backward line, which I lean back to very often, and
+ for once, as you made me write directly, why I wrote, as my thoughts
+ went, that way.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Say how you are, beloved&mdash;and do not brood over that 'Soul's Tragedy,'
+ which I wish I had here with 'Luria,' because, so, you should not see
+ it for a month at least. And take exercise and keep well&mdash;and remember
+ how many letters I must have before Saturday. May God bless you. Do
+ you want to hear me say
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: center">I cannot love you less...?
+</p>
+<p style="text-indent: 0em"><i>That</i> is a doubtful phrase. And
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: center">I cannot love you more
+</p>
+<p style="text-indent: 0em">is doubtful too, for reasons I could give. More or less, I really love
+ you, but it does not sound right, even <i>so</i>, does it? I know what it
+ ought to be, and will put it into the 'seal' and the 'paper' with the
+ ineffable other things.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Dearest, do not go to St. Petersburg. Do not think of going, for fear
+ it should come true and you should go, and while you were helping the
+ Jews and teaching Nicholas, what (in that case) would become of your
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right"><SPAN class="sc-ex">Ba</span>?
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>R.B. to E.B.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Tuesday.<br>
+[Post-mark, February 24, 1846.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ Ah, sweetest, in spite of our agreement, here is the note that sought
+ not to go, but must&mdash;because, if there is no speaking of Mrs. Jamesons
+ and such like without bringing in your dear name (not <i>dearest</i> name,
+ my Ba!) what is the good of not writing it down, now, when I, though
+ possessed with the love of it no more than usual, yet <i>may</i> speak, and
+ to a hearer? And I have to thank you with all my heart for the good
+ news of the increasing strength and less need for the opium&mdash;how I do
+ thank you, my dearest&mdash;and desire to thank God through whose goodness
+ it all is! This I could not but say now, to-morrow I will write at
+ length, having been working a little this morning, with whatever
+ effect. So now I will go out and see your elm-trees and gate, and
+ think the thoughts over again, and coming home I shall perhaps find a
+ letter.
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">Dearest, dearest&mdash;my perfect blessing you are!</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">May God continue his care for us. R.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>R.B. to E.B.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Wednesday Morning.<br>
+[Post-mark, February 25, 1846.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ Once you were pleased to say, my own Ba, that 'I made you do as I
+ would.' I am quite sure, you make me <i>speak</i> as you would, and not at
+ all as I mean&mdash;and for one instance, I never surely spoke anything
+ half so untrue as that 'I came with the intention of loving whomever I
+ should find'&mdash;No! wreathed shells and hollows in ruins, and roofs of
+ caves may transform a voice wonderfully, make more of it or less, or
+ so change it as to almost alter, but turn a 'no' into a 'yes' can no
+ echo (except the Irish one), and I said 'no' to such a charge, and
+ still say 'no.' I <i>did</i> have a presentiment&mdash;and though it is hardly
+ possible for me to look back on it now without lending it the true
+ colours given to it by the event, yet I <i>can</i> put them aside, if I
+ please, and remember that I not merely hoped it would not be so (<i>not</i>
+ that the effect I expected to be produced would be <i>less</i> than in
+ anticipation, certainly I did not hope <i>that</i>, but that it would range
+ itself with the old feelings of simple reverence and sympathy and
+ friendship, that I should love you as much as I supposed I <i>could</i>
+ love, and no more) but in the confidence that nothing could occur to
+ divert me from my intended way of life, I made&mdash;went on making
+ arrangements to return to Italy. You know&mdash;did I not tell you&mdash;I
+ wished to see you before I returned? And I had heard of you just so
+ much as seemed to make it impossible such a relation could ever exist.
+ I know very well, if you choose to refer to my letters you may easily
+ bring them to bear a sense in parts, more agreeable to your own theory
+ than to mine, the true one&mdash;but that was instinct,
+ Providence&mdash;anything rather than foresight. Now I will convince you!
+ yourself have noticed the difference between the <i>letters</i> and the
+ <i>writer</i>; the greater 'distance of the latter from you,' why was that?
+ Why, if not because the conduct <i>began</i> with <i>him</i>, with one who had
+ now seen you&mdash;was no continuation of the conduct, as influenced by the
+ feeling, of the letters&mdash;else, they, if <i>near</i>, should have enabled
+ him, if but in the natural course of time and with increase of
+ familiarity, to become <i>nearer</i>&mdash;but it was not so! The letters began
+ by loving you after their way&mdash;but what a world-wide difference
+ between <i>that</i> love and the true, the love from seeing and hearing and
+ feeling, since you make me resolve, what now lies blended so
+ harmoniously, into its component parts. Oh, I know what is old from
+ what is new, and how chrystals may surround and glorify other vessels
+ meant for ordinary service than Lord N's! But I <i>don't</i> know that
+ handling may not snap them off, some of the more delicate ones; and if
+ you let me, love, I will not again, ever again, consider how it came
+ and whence, and when, so curiously, so pryingly, but believe that it
+ was always so, and that it all came at once, all the same; the more
+ unlikelinesses the better, for they set off the better the truth of
+ truths that here, ('how begot? how nourished?')&mdash;here is the whole
+ wondrous Ba filling my whole heart and soul; and over-filling it,
+ because she is in all the world, too, where I look, where I fancy. At
+ the same time, because all is so wondrous and so sweet, do you think
+ that it would be <i>so</i> difficult for me to analyse it, and give causes
+ to the effects in sufficiently numerous instances, even to 'justify my
+ presentiment?' Ah, dear, dearest Ba, I could, could indeed, could
+ account for all, or enough! But you are unconscious, I do believe, of
+ your power, and the knowledge of it would be no added grace, perhaps!
+ So let us go on&mdash;taking a lesson out of the world's book in a
+ different sense. You shall think I love you for&mdash;(tell me, you must,
+ what for) while in my secret heart I know what my 'mission of
+ humanity' means, and what telescopic and microscopic views it procures
+ me. Enough&mdash;Wait, one word about the 'too kind letters'&mdash;could not the
+ same Montefiore understand that though he deserved not one of his
+ thousand guineas, yet that he is in disgrace if they bate him of his
+ next gift by merely <i>ten</i>? It <i>is</i> all too kind&mdash;but I shall feel the
+ diminishing of the kindness, be very sure! Of that there is, however,
+ not too alarming a sign in this dearest, because last of all&mdash;dearest
+ letter of all&mdash;till the next! I looked yesterday over the 'Tragedy,'
+ and think it will do after all. I will bring one part at least next
+ time, and 'Luria' take away, if you let me, so all will be off my
+ mind, and April and May be the welcomer? Don't think I am going to
+ take any extraordinary pains. There are some things in the 'Tragedy' I
+ should like to preserve and print now, leaving the future to spring
+ as it likes, in any direction, and these half-dead, half-alive works
+ fetter it, if left behind.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Yet one thing will fetter it worse, only one thing&mdash;if <i>you</i>, in any
+ respect, stay behind? You that in all else help me and will help me,
+ beyond words&mdash;beyond dreams&mdash;if, because I find you, your own works
+ <i>stop</i>&mdash;'then comes the Selah and the voice is hushed.' Oh, no, no,
+ dearest, <i>so</i> would the help cease to be help&mdash;the joy to be joy, Ba
+ herself to be <i>quite</i> Ba, and my own Siren singing song for song. Dear
+ love, will that be kind, and right, and like the rest? Write and
+ promise that all shall be resumed, the romance-poem chiefly, and I
+ will try and feel more yours than ever now. Am I not with you in the
+ world, proud of you&mdash;and <i>vain</i>, too, very likely, which is all the
+ sweeter if it is a sin as you teach me. Indeed dearest, I have set my
+ heart on your fulfilling your mission&mdash;my heart is on it! Bless you,
+ my Ba&mdash;
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">Your R.B.
+</p>
+<p>
+ I am so well as to have resumed the shower-bath (this morning)&mdash;and I
+ walk, especially near the elms and stile&mdash;and mean to walk, and be
+ very well&mdash;and you, dearest?
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>E.B.B. to R.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">[Post-mark, February 26, 1846.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ I confess that while I was writing those words I had a thought that
+ they were not quite yours as you said them. Still it comes to
+ something in their likeness, but we will not talk of it and break off
+ the chrystals&mdash;they <i>are</i> so brittle, then? do you know <i>that</i> by an
+ 'instinct.' But I agree that it is best not to talk&mdash;I 'gave it up' as
+ a riddle long ago. Let there be 'analysis' even, and it will not be
+ solution. I have my own thoughts of course, and you have yours, and
+ the worst is that a third person looking down on us from some
+ snow-capped height, and free from personal influences, would have
+ <i>his</i> thoughts too, and <i>he</i> would think that if you had been
+ reasonable as usual you would have gone to Italy. I have by heart (or
+ by head at least) what the third person would think. The third person
+ thundered to me in an abstraction for ever so long, and at intervals I
+ hear him still, only you shall not to-day, because he talks 'damnable
+ iterations' and teazes you. Nay, the first person is teazing you now
+ perhaps, without going any further, and yet I must go a little
+ further, just to say (after accepting all possible unlikelinesses and
+ miracles, because everything was miraculous and impossible) that it
+ was agreed between us long since that you did not love me for
+ anything&mdash;your having no reason for it is the only way of your not
+ seeming unreasonable. Also <i>for my own sake</i>. I like it to be so&mdash;I
+ cannot have peace with the least change from it. Dearest, take the
+ baron's hawthorn bough which, in spite of his fine dream of it is dead
+ since the other day, and so much the worse than when I despised it
+ last&mdash;take that dead stick and push it upright into the sand as the
+ tide rises, and the whole blue sea draws up its glittering breadth and
+ length towards and around it. But what then? What does <i>that prove</i>?
+ ... as the philosopher said of the poem. So we ought not to talk of
+ such things; and we get warned off even in the accidental
+ illustrations taken up to light us. Still, the stick certainly did not
+ draw the sea.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Dearest and best you were yesterday, to write me the little note! You
+ are better than the imaginations of my heart, and <i>they</i>, as far as
+ they relate to you (not further) are <i>not</i> desperately wicked, I
+ think. I always expect the kindest things from you, and you always are
+ doing some kindness beyond what is expected, and this is a miracle
+ too, like the rest, now isn't it? When the knock came last night, I
+ knew it was your letter, and not another's. Just another little leaf
+ of my Koran! How I thank you ... thank you! If I write too kind
+ letters, as you say, why they may be too kind for me to send, but not
+ for you to receive; and I suppose I think more of you than of me,
+ which accounts for my writing them, accounts and justifies. And <i>that</i>
+ is my reflection not now for the first time. For we break rules very
+ often&mdash;as that exegetical third person might expound to you clearly
+ out of the ninety-sixth volume of the 'Code of Conventions,' only you
+ are not like another, nor have you been to me like another&mdash;you began
+ with most improvident and (will you let me say?) <i>unmasculine</i>
+ generosity, and Queen Victoria does not sit upon a mat after the
+ fashion of Queen Pomare, nor should.
+</p>
+<p>
+ But ... but ... you know very fully that you are breaking faith in the
+ matter of the 'Tragedy' and 'Luria'&mdash;you promised to rest&mdash;and <i>you
+ rest for three days</i>. Is it <i>so</i> that people get well? or keep well?
+ Indeed I do not think I shall let you have 'Luria.' Ah&mdash;be careful, I
+ do beseech you&mdash;be careful. There is time for a pause, and the works
+ will profit by it themselves. And <i>you</i>! And I ... if you are ill!&mdash;
+</p>
+<p>
+ For the rest I will let you walk in my field, and see my elms as much
+ as you please ... though I hear about the shower bath with a little
+ suspicion. Why, if it did you harm before, should it not again? and
+ why should you use it, if it threatens harm? Now tell me if it hasn't
+ made you rather unwell since the new trial!&mdash;tell me, dear, dearest.
+</p>
+<p>
+ As for myself, I believe that you set about exhorting me to be busy,
+ just that I might not reproach <i>you</i> for the over-business. Confess
+ that <i>that</i> was the only meaning of the exhortation. But no, you are
+ quite serious, you say. You even threaten me in a sort of underground
+ murmur, which sounds like a nascent earthquake; and if I do not write
+ so much a day directly, your stipendiary magistrateship will take away
+ my license to be loved ... I am not to be Ba to you any longer ... you
+ say! And is <i>this</i> right? now I ask you. Ever so many chrystals fell
+ off by that stroke of the baton, I do assure you. Only you did not
+ mean quite what you said so too articulately, and you will unsay it,
+ if you please, and unthink it near the elms.
+</p>
+<p>
+ As for the writing, I will write ... I have written ... I am writing.
+ You do not fancy that I have given up writing?&mdash;No. Only I have
+ certainly been more loitering and distracted than usual in what I have
+ done, which is not my fault&mdash;nor yours directly&mdash;and I feel an
+ indisposition to setting about the romance, the hand of the soul
+ shakes. I am too happy and not calm enough, I suppose, to have the
+ right inclination. Well&mdash;it will come. But all in blots and fragments
+ there are verses enough, to fill a volume done in the last year.
+</p>
+<p>
+ And if there were not ... if there were none ... I hold that I should
+ be Ba, and also <i>your</i> Ba ... which is 'insolence' ... will you say?
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>R.B. to E.B.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Thursday.<br>
+[Post-mark, February 26, 1846.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ As for the 'third person,' my sweet Ba, he was a wise speaker from the
+ beginning; and in our case he will say, turning to me&mdash;'the late
+ Robert Hall&mdash;when a friend admired that one with so high an estimate
+ of the value of intellectuality in woman should yet marry some kind of
+ cook-maid animal, as did the said Robert; wisely answered, "you can't
+ kiss Mind"! May <i>you</i> not discover eventually,' (this is to me) 'that
+ mere intellectual endowments&mdash;though incontestably of the loftiest
+ character&mdash;mere Mind, though that Mind be Miss B's&mdash;cannot be
+ <i>kissed</i>&mdash;nor, repent too late the absence of those humbler qualities,
+ those softer affections which, like flowerets at the mountain's foot,
+ if not so proudly soaring as, as, as!...' and so on, till one of us
+ died, with laughing or being laughed at! So judges the third person!
+ and if, to help him, we let him into your room at Wimpole Street,
+ suffered him to see with Flush's eyes, he would say with just as wise
+ an air 'True, mere personal affections may be warm enough, but does it
+ augur well for the durability of an attachment that it should be
+ <i>wholly, exclusively</i> based on such perishable attractions as the
+ sweetness of a mouth, the beauty of an eye? I could wish, rather, to
+ know that there was something of less transitory nature co-existent
+ with this&mdash;some congeniality of Mental pursuit, some&mdash;' Would he not
+ say that? But I can't do his platitudes justice because here is our
+ post going out and I have been all the morning walking in the perfect
+ joy of my heart, with your letter, and under its blessing&mdash;dearest,
+ dearest Ba&mdash;let me say more to-morrow&mdash;only this now, that you&mdash;ah,
+ what are you not to me! My dearest love, bless you&mdash;till to-morrow
+ when I will strengthen the prayer; (no, <i>lengthen</i> it!)
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">Ever your own.
+</p>
+<p>
+ 'Hawthorn'<a href="#note-25"><b>25</b></a>&mdash;to show how Spring gets on!
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>E.B.B. to R.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Thursday Evening.<br>
+[Post-mark, February 27, 1846.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ If all third persons were as foolish as this third person of yours,
+ ever dearest, first and second persons might follow their own devices
+ without losing much in the way of good counsel. But you are unlucky in
+ your third person as far as the wits go, he talks a great deal of
+ nonsense, and Flush, who is sensible, will have nothing to do with
+ him, he says, any more than you will with Sir Moses:&mdash;he is quite a
+ third person <i>singular</i> for the nonsense he talks!
+</p>
+<p>
+ So, instead of him, you shall hear what I have been doing to-day. The
+ sun, which drew out you and the hawthorns, persuaded me that it was
+ warm enough to go down-stairs&mdash;and I put on my cloak as if I were
+ going into the snow, and went into the drawing-room and took
+ Henrietta by surprise as she sate at the piano singing. Well, I meant
+ to stay half an hour and come back again, for I am upon 'Tinkler's
+ ground' in the drawing-room and liable to whole droves of morning
+ visitors&mdash;and Henrietta kept me, kept me, because she wanted me,
+ besought me, to stay and see the great sight of Capt. Surtees
+ Cook&mdash;<i>plus</i> his regimentals&mdash;fresh from the royal presence at St.
+ James's, and I never saw him in my life, though he is a sort of
+ cousin. So, though I hated it as you may think, ... not liking to be
+ unkind to my sister, I stayed and stayed one ten minutes after
+ another, till it seemed plain that he wasn't coming at all (as I told
+ her) and that Victoria had kept him to dinner, enchanted with the
+ regimentals. And half laughing and half quarrelling, still she kept me
+ by force, until a knock came most significantly ... and '<i>There</i> is
+ Surtees' said she ... 'now you must and shall stay! So foolish,' (I
+ had my hand on the door-handle to go out) 'he, your own cousin too!
+ who always calls you Ba, except before Papa.' Which might have
+ encouraged me perhaps, but I can't be sure of it, as the very next
+ moment apprized us both that no less a person than Mrs. Jameson was
+ standing out in the passage. The whole 36th. regiment could scarcely
+ have been more astounding to me. As to staying to see her in that
+ room, with the prospect of the military descent in combination, I
+ couldn't have done it for the world! so I made Henrietta, who had
+ drawn me into the scrape, take her up-stairs, and followed myself in a
+ minute or two&mdash;and the corollary of this interesting history is, that
+ being able to talk at all after all that 'fuss,' and after walking
+ 'up-stairs and down-stairs' like the ancestor of your spider, proves
+ my gigantic strength&mdash;now doesn't it?
+</p>
+<p>
+ For the rest, 'here be proofs' that the first person can be as foolish
+ as any third person in the world. What do you think?
+</p>
+<p>
+ And Mrs. Jameson was kind beyond speaking of, and talked of taking me
+ to Italy. What do you say? It is somewhere about the fifth or sixth
+ proposition of the sort which has come to me. I shall be embarrassed,
+ it seems to me, by the multitude of escorts to Italy. But the
+ kindness, one cannot laugh at so much kindness.
+</p>
+<p>
+ I wanted to hear her speak of you, and was afraid. I <i>could not</i> name
+ you. Yet I <i>did</i> want to hear the last 'Bell' praised.
+</p>
+<p>
+ She goes to Ireland for two months soon, but prints a book first, a
+ collection of essays. I have not seen Mr. Kenyon, with whom she dined
+ yesterday. The Macreadys were to be there, and he told me a week ago
+ that he very nearly committed himself in a 'social mistake' by
+ inviting you to meet them.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Ah my hawthorn spray! Do you know, I caught myself pitying it for
+ being gathered, with that green promise of leaves on it! There is room
+ too on it for the feet of a bird! Still I shall keep it longer than it
+ would have stayed in the hedge, <i>that</i> is certain!
+</p>
+<p>
+ The first you ever gave me was a yellow rose sent in a letter, and
+ shall I tell you what <i>that</i> means&mdash;the yellow rose? '<i>Infidelity</i>,'
+ says the dictionary of flowers. You see what an omen, ... to begin
+ with!
+</p>
+<p>
+ Also you see that I am not tired with the great avatar to-day&mdash;the
+ 'fell swoop' rather&mdash;mine, into the drawing-room, and Mrs. Jameson's
+ on <i>me</i>.
+</p>
+<p>
+ And I shall hear to-morrow again, really? I '<i>let</i>' you. And you are
+ best, kindest, dearest, every day. Did I ever tell you that you made
+ me do what you choose? I fancied that I only <i>thought</i> so. May God
+ bless you. I am your own.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Shall I have the 'Soul's Tragedy' on Saturday?&mdash;any of it? But <i>do not
+ work</i>&mdash;I beseech you to take care.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>R.B. to E.B.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">[Post-mark, February 27, 1846.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ To be sure my 'first person' was nonsensical, and, in that respect
+ made speak properly, I hope, only he was cut short in the middle of
+ his performance by the exigencies of the post. So, never mind what
+ such persons say, my sweetest, because they know nothing at all&mdash;<i>quod
+ erat demonstrandum</i>. But you, love, you speak roses, and
+ hawthorn-blossoms when you tell me of the cloak put on, and the
+ descent, and the entry, and staying and delaying. I will have had a
+ hand in all that; I know what I wished all the morning, and now this
+ much came true! But you should have seen the regimentals, if I could
+ have so contrived it, for I confess to a Chinese love for bright
+ red&mdash;the very names 'vermilion' 'scarlet' warm me, yet in this cold
+ climate nobody wears red to comfort one's eye save soldiers and fox
+ hunters, and old women fresh from a Parish Christmas Distribution of
+ cloaks. To dress in floating loose crimson silk, I almost understand
+ being a Cardinal! Do you know anything of Nat Lee's Tragedies? In one
+ of them a man angry with a Cardinal cries&mdash;
+</p>
+<blockquote><blockquote><blockquote><blockquote><blockquote><blockquote><p style="text-indent: 0em">Stand back, and let me mow this poppy down,<br>
+This rank red weed that spoils the Churches' corn.
+</p>
+</blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><p style="text-indent: 0em">Is not that good? and presently, when the same worthy is poisoned
+ (that is the Cardinal)&mdash;they bid him&mdash;'now, Cardinal, lie down and
+ roar!'
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: center">Think of thy scarlet sins!
+</p>
+<p style="text-indent: 0em">Of the justice of all which, you will judge with no Mrs. Jameson for
+ guide when we see the Sistina together, I trust! By the way, yesterday
+ I went to Dulwich to see some pictures, by old Teniers, Murillo,
+ Gainsborough, Raphael!&mdash;then twenty names about, and last but one, as
+ if just thought of, 'Correggio.' The whole collection, including 'a
+ <i>divine</i> picture by Murillo,' and Titian's Daughter (hitherto supposed
+ to be in the Louvre)&mdash;the whole I would, I think, have cheerfully
+ given a pound or two for the privilege of not possessing&mdash;so execrable
+ as sign-paintings even! 'Are there worse poets in their way than
+ painters?' Yet the melancholy business is here&mdash;that the bad poet goes
+ out of his way, writes his verses in the language he learned in order
+ to do a hundred other things with it, all of which he can go on and do
+ afterwards&mdash;but the painter has spent the best of his life in learning
+ even how to produce such monstrosities as these, and to what other
+ good do his acquisitions go? This short minute of life our one chance,
+ an eternity on either side! and a man does not walk whistling and
+ ruddy by the side of hawthorn hedges in spring, but shuts himself up
+ and conies out after a dozen years with 'Titian's Daughter' and,
+ there, gone is his life, let somebody else try!
+</p>
+<p>
+ I have tried&mdash;my trial is made too!
+</p>
+<p>
+ To-morrow you shall tell me, dearest, that Mrs. Jameson wondered to
+ see you so well&mdash;did she not wonder? Ah, to-morrow! There is a lesson
+ from all this writing and mistaking and correcting and being
+ corrected; and what, but that a word goes safely only from lip to lip,
+ dearest? See how the cup slipped from the lip and snapped the
+ chrystals, you say! But the writing is but for a time&mdash;'a time and
+ times and half a time!'&mdash;would I knew when the prophetic weeks end!
+ Still, one day, as I say, no more writing, (and great scandalization
+ of the third person, peeping through the fringes of Flush's ears!)
+ meanwhile, I wonder whether if I meet Mrs. Jameson I may practise
+ diplomacy and say carelessly 'I should be glad to know what Miss B. is
+ like&mdash;' No, that I must not do, something tells me, 'for reasons, for
+ reasons'&mdash;
+</p>
+<p>
+ I do not know&mdash;you may perhaps have to wait a little longer for my
+ 'divine Murillo' of a Tragedy. My sister is copying it as I give the
+ pages, but&mdash;in fact my wise head does ache a little&mdash;it is
+ inconceivable! As if it took a great storm to topple over some stone,
+ and once the stone pushed from its right place, any bird's foot, which
+ would hardly bend the hawthorn spray, may set it trembling! The aching
+ begins with reading the presentation-list at the Drawing-room quite
+ naturally, and with no shame at all! But it is gentle, well-behaved
+ aching now, so I <i>do</i> care, as you bid me, Ba, my Ba, whom I call Ba
+ to my heart but could not, I really believe, call so before another,
+ even your sister, if&mdash;if&mdash;
+</p>
+<p>
+ But Ba, I call you boldly here, and I dare kiss your dear, dear eyes,
+ till to-morrow&mdash;Bless you, my own.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>E.B.B. to R.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Sunday.<br>
+[Post-mark, March 2, 1846.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ You never could think that I meant any insinuation against you by a
+ word of what was said yesterday, or that I sought or am likely to seek
+ a 'security'! do you know it was not right of you to use such an
+ expression&mdash;indeed no. You were angry with me for just one minute, or
+ you would not have used it&mdash;and why? Now what did I say that was wrong
+ or unkind even by construction? If I did say anything, it was three
+ times wrong, and unjust as well as unkind, and wronged my own heart
+ and consciousness of all that you are to me, more than it could <i>you</i>.
+ But you began speaking of yourself just as a woman might speak under
+ the same circumstances (you remember what you said), and then <i>I</i>,
+ remembering that all the men in the world would laugh such an idea to
+ scorn, said something to that effect, you <i>know</i>. I once was in
+ company with a man, however, who valued himself very much on his
+ constancy to a woman who was so deeply affected by it that she became
+ his wife at last ... and the whole neighbourhood came out to stare at
+ him on that ground as a sort of monster. And can you guess what the
+ constancy meant? Seven years before, he loved that woman, he said, and
+ she repulsed him. 'And in the meantime, <i>how many</i>?' I had the
+ impertinence to ask a female friend who told me the tale. 'Why,' she
+ answered with the utmost simplicity, 'I understand that Miss A. and
+ Miss B. and Mrs. C. would not listen to him, but he took Miss D.'s
+ rejection most to heart.' That was the head and front of his
+ 'constancy' to Miss E., who had been loved, she boasted, for seven
+ years ... that is, once at the beginning and once at the end. It was
+ just a coincidence of the 'premier pas' and the 'pis aller.'
+</p>
+<p>
+ Beloved, I could not mean this for you; you are not made of such
+ stuff, as we both know.
+</p>
+<p>
+ And for myself, it was my compromise with my own scruples, that you
+ should not be 'chained' to me, not in the merest metaphor, that you
+ should not seem to be bound, in honour or otherwise, so that if you
+ stayed with me it should be your free choice to stay, not the
+ <i>consequence</i> of a choice so many months before. That was my
+ compromise with my scruples, and not my doubt of your affection&mdash;and
+ least of all, was it an intention of trifling with you sooner or later
+ that made me wish to suspend all <i>decisions</i> as long as possible. I
+ have decided (for me) to let it be as you shall please&mdash;now I told you
+ that before. Either we will live on as we are, until an obstacle
+ arises,&mdash;for indeed I do not look for a 'security' where you suppose,
+ and the very appearance of it <i>there</i>, is what most rebuts me&mdash;or I
+ will be yours in the obvious way, to go out of England the next
+ half-hour if possible. As to the steps to be taken (or not taken)
+ before the last step, we must think of those. The worst is that the
+ only question is about a <i>form</i>. Virtually the evil is the same all
+ round, whatever we do. Dearest, it was plain to see yesterday evening
+ when he came into this room for a moment at seven o'clock, before
+ going to his own to dress for dinner ... plain to see, that he was not
+ altogether pleased at finding you here in the morning. There was no
+ pretext for objecting gravely&mdash;but it was plain that he was not
+ pleased. Do not let this make you uncomfortable, he will forget all
+ about it, and I was not <i>scolded</i>, do you understand. It was more
+ manner, but my sisters thought as I did of the significance:&mdash;and it
+ was enough to prove to me (if I had not known) what a desperate game
+ we should be playing if we depended on a yielding nerve <i>there</i>.
+</p>
+<p>
+ And to-day I went down-stairs (to prove how my promises stand) though
+ I could find at least ten good excuses for remaining in my own room,
+ for our cousin, Sam Barrett, who brought the interruption yesterday
+ and put me out of humour (it wasn't the fault of the dear little
+ cousin, Lizzie ... my 'portrait' ... who was '<i>so</i> sorry,' she said,
+ dear child, to have missed Papa somewhere on the stairs!) the cousin
+ who should have been in Brittany yesterday instead of here, sate in
+ the drawing-room all this morning, and had visitors there, and so I
+ had excellent excuses for never moving from my chair. Yet, the field
+ being clear at <i>half-past two</i>! I went for half an hour, just&mdash;just
+ for <i>you</i>. Did you think of me, I wonder? It was to meet your thoughts
+ that I went, dear dearest.
+</p>
+<p>
+ How clever these sketches are. The expression produced by such
+ apparently inadequate means is quite striking; and I have been making
+ my brothers admire them, and they 'wonder you don't think of employing
+ them in an illustrated edition of your works.' Which might be, really!
+ Ah, you did not ask for 'Luria'! Not that I should have let you have
+ it!&mdash;I think I should not indeed. Dearest, you take care of the head
+ ... and don't make that tragedy of the soul one for mine, by letting
+ it make you ill. Beware too of the shower-bath&mdash;it plainly does not
+ answer for you at this season. And walk, and think of me for <i>your</i>
+ good, if such a combination should be possible.
+</p>
+<p>
+ And <i>I</i> think of <i>you</i> ... if I do not of Italy. Yet I forget to speak
+ to you of the Dulwich Gallery. I never saw those pictures, but am
+ astonished that the whole world should be wrong in praising them.
+ 'Divine' is a bad word for Murillo in any case&mdash;because he is
+ intensely human in his most supernatural subjects. His beautiful
+ Trinity in the National Gallery, which I saw the last time I went out
+ to look at pictures, has no deity in it&mdash;and I seem to see it now. And
+ do you remember the visitation of the angels to Abraham (the Duke of
+ Sutherland's picture&mdash;is it not?) where the mystic visitors look like
+ shepherds who had not even dreamt of God? But I always understood that
+ that Dulwich Gallery was famous for great works&mdash;you surprise me! And
+ for painters ... their badness is more ostentatious than that of
+ poets&mdash;they stare idiocy out of the walls, and set the eyes of
+ sensitive men on edge. For the rest, however, I very much doubt
+ whether they wear their lives more to rags, than writers who mistake
+ their vocation in poetry do. There is a mechanism in poetry as in the
+ other art&mdash;and, to men not native to the way of it, it runs hard and
+ heavily. The 'cudgelling of the brain' is as good labour as the
+ grinding of the colours, ... do you not think?
+</p>
+<p>
+ If ever I am in the Sistine Chapel, it will not be with Mrs.
+ Jameson&mdash;no. If ever I should be there, what teaching I shall want,
+ <i>I</i> who have seen so few pictures, and love them only as children do,
+ with an unlearned love, just for the sake of the thoughts they bring.
+ Wonderfully ignorant I am, to have had eyes and ears so long! There is
+ music, now, which lifts the hair on my head, I feel it so much, ...
+ yet all I know of it as art, all I have heard of the works of the
+ masters in it, has been the mere sign and suggestion, such as the
+ private piano may give. I never heard an oratorio, for instance, in my
+ life&mdash;judge by <i>that</i>! It is a guess, I make, at all the greatness and
+ divinity ... feeling in it, though, distinctly and certainly, that a
+ composer like Beethoven <i>must</i> stand above the divinest painter in
+ soul-godhead, and nearest to the true poet, of all artists. And this
+ I felt in my guess, long before I knew you. But observe how, if I had
+ died in this illness, I should have left a sealed world behind me!
+ <i>you</i>, unknown too&mdash;unguessed at, <i>you</i>, ... in many respects,
+ wonderfully unguessed at! Lately I have learnt to despise my own
+ instincts. And apart from those&mdash;and <i>you</i>, ... it was right for me to
+ be melancholy, in the consciousness of passing blindfolded under all
+ the world-stars, and of going out into another side of the creation,
+ with a blank for the experience of this ... the last revelation,
+ unread! How the thought of it used to depress me sometimes!
+</p>
+<p>
+ Talking of music, I had a proposition the other day from certain of
+ Mr. Russell's (the singer's) friends, about his setting to music my
+ 'Cry of the Children.' His programme exhibits all the horrors of the
+ world, I see! Lifeboats ... madhouses ... gamblers' wives ... all done
+ to the right sort of moaning. His audiences must go home delightfully
+ miserable, I should fancy. He has set the 'Song of the Shirt' ... and
+ my 'Cry of the Children' will be acceptable, it is supposed, as a
+ climax of agony. Do you know this Mr. Russell, and what sort of music
+ he suits to his melancholy? But to turn my 'Cry' to a 'Song,' a
+ burden, it is said, is required&mdash;he can't sing it without a burden!
+ and behold what has been sent 'for my approval'.... I shall copy it
+ <i>verbatim</i> for you....
+</p>
+<blockquote><blockquote><blockquote><blockquote><blockquote><blockquote><p style="text-indent: 0em">And the threads twirl, twirl, twirl,<br>
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
+Before each boy and girl;<br>
+And the wheels, big and little, still whirl, whirl, whirl.
+</p>
+</blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote>
+<p style="text-indent: 0em">... accompaniment <i>agitato</i>, imitating the roar of the machinery!
+</p>
+<p>
+ This is not endurable ... ought not to be ... should it now? Do tell
+ me.
+</p>
+<p>
+ May God bless you, very dearest! Let me hear how you are&mdash;and think
+ how I am
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">Your own....
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>R.B. to E.B.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">[Post-mark, March 2, 1846.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ Dearest, I have been kept in town and just return in time to say why
+ you have <i>no</i> note ... to-morrow I will write ... so much there is to
+ say on the subject of this letter I find.
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">Bless you, all beloved&mdash;</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">R.B.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Oh, do not sleep another night on that horrible error I have led you
+ into! The 'Dulwich Gallery'!&mdash;!!!&mdash;oh, no. Only some pictures to be
+ sold at the Greyhound Inn, Dulwich&mdash;'the genuine property of a
+ gentleman deceased.'
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>R.B. to E.B.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Sunday Evening.<br>
+[Post-mark, March 2, 1846.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ One or two words, if no more, I must write to dearest Ba, the night
+ would go down in double blackness if I had neither written nor been
+ written to! So here is another piece of 'kindness' on my part, such as
+ I have received praise for of late! My own sweetest, there is just
+ this good in such praise, that by it one comes to something pleasantly
+ definite amid the hazy uncertainties of mere wishes and
+ possibilities&mdash;while my whole heart does, <i>does</i> so yearn, love, to do
+ something to prove its devotion for you; and, now and then, amuses
+ itself with foolish imaginings of real substantial services to which
+ it should be found equal if fortune so granted; suddenly you interpose
+ with thanks, in such terms as would all too much reward the highest of
+ even those services which are never to be; and for what?&mdash;for a note,
+ a going to Town, a &mdash;&mdash;! Well, there are definite beginnings
+ certainly, if you will recognise them&mdash;I mean, that since you <i>do</i>
+ accept, far from 'despising this day of small things,' then I may
+ take heart, and be sure that even though none of the great
+ achievements should fall to my happy chance, still the barrenest,
+ flattest life will&mdash;<i>must</i> of needs produce in its season better
+ fruits than these poor ones&mdash;I keep it, value it, now, that it may
+ produce such.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Also I determine never again to 'analyse,' nor let you analyse if the
+ sweet mouth can be anyway stopped: the love shall be one and
+ indivisible&mdash;and the Loves we used to know from
+</p>
+<blockquote><blockquote><blockquote><blockquote><blockquote><blockquote><p style="text-indent: 0em">One another huddled lie ...<br>
+Close beside Her tenderly&mdash;
+</p>
+</blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><p style="text-indent: 0em">(which is surely the next line). Now am I not anxious to know what
+ your father said? And if anybody else said or wondered ... how hould
+ I know? Of all fighting&mdash;the warfare with shadows&mdash;what a work is
+ <i>there</i>. But tell me,&mdash;and, with you for me&mdash;
+</p>
+<p>
+ Bless me dearest ever, as the face above mine blesses me&mdash;
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">Your own
+</p>
+<p>
+ Sir Moses set off this morning, I hear&mdash;somebody yesterday called the
+ telescope an 'optical delusion,' anticipating many more of the kind!
+ So much for this 'wandering Jew.'
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>E.B.B. to R.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Monday Evening.<br>
+[Post-mark, March 3, 1846.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ Upon the whole, I think, I am glad when you are kept in town and
+ prevented from writing what you call 'much' to me. Because in the
+ first place, the little from <i>you</i>, is always much to <i>me</i>&mdash;and then,
+ besides, <i>the letter comes</i>, and with it the promise of another! Two
+ letters have I had from you to-day, ever dearest! How I thank
+ you!&mdash;yes, <i>indeed</i>! It was like yourself to write yesterday ... to
+ remember what a great gap there would have been otherwise, as it
+ looked on this side&mdash;here. The worst of Saturday is (when you come on
+ it) that Sunday follows&mdash;Saturday night bringing no letter. Well, it
+ was very good of you, best of you!
+</p>
+<p>
+ For the 'analyzing' I give it up willingly, only that I must say what
+ altogether I forgot to say in my last letter, that it was not <i>I</i>, if
+ you please, who spoke of the chrystals breaking away! And you, to
+ quote me with that certainty! "The chrystals are broken off," <i>you
+ say</i>.' <i>I</i> say!! When it was in your letter, and not at all in mine!!
+</p>
+<p>
+ The truth is that I was stupid, rather, about the Dulwich
+ collection&mdash;it was my fault. I caught up the idea of the gallery out
+ of a heap of other thoughts, and really might have known better if I
+ had given myself a chance, by considering.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Mr. Kenyon came to-day, and has taken out a licence, it seems to me,
+ for praising you, for he praised and praised. Somebody has told him
+ (who had spent several days with you in a house with a large library)
+ that he came away 'quite astounded by the versatility of your
+ learning'&mdash;and that, to complete the circle, you discoursed as
+ scientifically on the training of greyhounds and breeding of ducks as
+ if you had never done anything else all your life. Then dear Mr.
+ Kenyon talked of the poems; and hoped, very earnestly I am sure, that
+ you would finish 'Saul'&mdash;which you ought to do, must do&mdash;<i>only not
+ now</i>. By the way Mrs. Coleridge had written to him to enquire whether
+ you had authority for the 'blue lilies,' rather than white. Then he
+ asked about 'Luria' and 'whether it was obscure'; and I said, not
+ unless the people, who considered it, began by blindfolding
+ themselves.
+</p>
+<p>
+ And where do you think Mr. Kenyon talks of going next February&mdash;a long
+ while off to be sure? To Italy of course. Everybody I ever heard of
+ seems to be going to Italy next winter. He visits his brother at
+ Vienna, and 'may cross the Alps and get to Pisa'&mdash;it is the shadow of
+ a scheme&mdash;nothing certain, so far.
+</p>
+<p>
+ I did not go down-stairs to-day because the wind blew and the
+ thermometer fell. To-morrow, perhaps I may. And <i>you</i>, dearest
+ dearest, might have put into the letters how you were when you wrote
+ them. You might&mdash;but you did not feel well and would not say so.
+ Confess that that was the reason. Reason or no reason, mention
+ yourself to-morrow, and for the rest, do not write a long letter so as
+ to increase the evil. There was nothing which I can remember as
+ requiring an answer in what I wrote to you, and though I <i>will</i> have
+ my letter of course, it shall be as brief as possible, if briefness is
+ good for you&mdash;<i>now always remember that</i>. Why if I, who talk against
+ 'Luria,' should work the mischief myself, what should I deserve? I
+ should be my own jury directly and not recommend to mercy ... not to
+ mine. Do take care&mdash;care for <i>me</i> just so much.
+</p>
+<p>
+ And, except that taking care of your health, what would you do for me
+ that you have not done? You have given me the best of the possible
+ gifts of one human soul to another, you have made my life new, and am
+ I to count these things as small and insufficient? Ah, you <i>know</i>, you
+ <i>know</i> that I cannot, ought not, will not.
+</p>
+<p>
+ May God bless you. He blesses me in letting me be grateful to you as
+ your Ba.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>R.B. to E.B.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Tuesday.<br>
+[Post-mark, March 3, 1846.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ First and most important of all,&mdash;dearest, 'angry'&mdash;with you, and for
+ <i>that</i>! It is just as if I had spoken contemptuously of that Gallery I
+ so love and so am grateful to&mdash;having been used to go there when a
+ child, far under the age allowed by the regulations&mdash;those two Guidos,
+ the wonderful Rembrandt of Jacob's vision, such a Watteau, the
+ triumphant three Murillo pictures, a Giorgione music-lesson group,
+ all the Poussins with the 'Armida' and 'Jupiter's nursing'&mdash;and&mdash;no
+ end to 'ands'&mdash;I have sate before one, some <i>one</i> of those pictures I
+ had predetermined to see, a good hour and then gone away ... it used
+ to be a green half-hour's walk over the fields. So much for one error,
+ now for the second like unto it; what I meant by charging you with
+ <i>seeing</i>, (not, <i>not</i> '<i>looking</i> for')&mdash;<i>seeing</i> undue 'security' in
+ <i>that</i>, in the form,&mdash;I meant to say 'you talk about me being 'free'
+ now, free till <i>then</i>, and I am rather jealous of the potency
+ attributed to the <i>form</i>, with all its solemnity, because it <i>is</i> a
+ form, and no more&mdash;yet you frankly agree with me that <i>that</i> form
+ complied with, there is no redemption; yours I am <i>then</i> sure enough,
+ to repent at leisure &amp;c. &amp;c.' So I meant to ask, 'then, all <i>now</i>
+ said, all short of that particular form of saying it, all goes for
+ comparatively nothing'? Here it is written down&mdash;you 'wish to
+ <i>suspend</i> all decisions as long as possible'&mdash;<i>that</i> form effects the
+ decision, then,&mdash;till then, 'where am I'? Which is just what Lord
+ Chesterfield cautions people against asking when they tell stories.
+ Love, Ba, my own heart's dearest, if all is <i>not</i> decided
+ <i>now</i>&mdash;why&mdash;hear a story, à propos of storytelling, and deduce what is
+ deducible. A very old Unitarian minister met a still older evangelical
+ brother&mdash;John Clayton (from whose son's mouth I heard what you shall
+ hear)&mdash;the two fell to argument about the true faith to be held&mdash;after
+ words enough, 'Well,' said the Unitarian, as winding up the
+ controversy with an amicable smile&mdash;'at least let us hope we are both
+ engaged in the <i>pursuit</i> of Truth!'&mdash;'<i>Pursuit</i> do you say?' cried the
+ other, 'here am I with my years eighty and odd&mdash;if I haven't <i>found</i>
+ Truth by this time where is my chance, pray?' My own Ba, if I have not
+ already <i>decided</i>, alas for me and the solemn words that are to help!
+ Though in another point of view there would be some luxurious feeling,
+ beyond the ordinary, in knowing one was kept safe to one's heart's
+ good by yet another wall than the hitherto recognised ones. Is there
+ any parallel in the notion I once heard a man deliver himself of in
+ the street&mdash;a labourer talking with his friends about '<i>wishes</i>'&mdash;and
+ this one wished, if he might get his wish, 'to have a nine gallon cask
+ of strong ale set running that minute and his own mouth to be <i>tied</i>
+ under it'&mdash;the exquisiteness of the delight was to be in the security
+ upon security,&mdash;the being 'tied.' Now, Ba says I shall not be
+ 'chained' if she can help!
+</p>
+<p>
+ But now&mdash;here all the jesting goes. You tell me what was observed in
+ the 'moment's' visit; by you, and (after, I suppose) by your sisters.
+ First, I <i>will</i> always see with your eyes <i>there</i>&mdash;next, what I see I
+ will <i>never</i> speak, if it pain you; but just this much truth I ought
+ to say, I think. I always give myself to you for the worst I am,&mdash;full
+ of faults as you will find, if you have not found them. But I <i>will</i>
+ not affect to be so bad, so wicked, as I count wickedness, as to call
+ that conduct other than intolerable&mdash;<i>there</i>, in my conviction of
+ <i>that</i>, is your real 'security' and mine for the future as the
+ present. That a father choosing to give out of his whole day some five
+ minutes to a daughter, supposed to be prevented from participating in
+ what he, probably, in common with the whole world of sensible men, as
+ distinguished from poets and dreamers, consider <i>every</i> pleasure of
+ life, by a complete foregoing of society&mdash;that he, after the Pisa
+ business and the enforced continuance, and as he must believe,
+ permanence of this state in which any other human being would go
+ mad&mdash;I do dare say, for the justification of God, who gave the mind to
+ be <i>used</i> in this world,&mdash;where it saves us, we are taught, or
+ destroys us,&mdash;and not to be sunk quietly, overlooked, and forgotten;
+ that, under these circumstances, finding ... what, you say, unless he
+ thinks he <i>does</i> find, he would close the door of his house instantly;
+ a mere sympathizing man, of the same literary tastes, who comes
+ good-naturedly, on a proper and unexceptionable introduction, to chat
+ with and amuse a little that invalid daughter, once a month, so far as
+ is known, for an hour perhaps,&mdash;that such a father should show
+ himself '<i>not pleased</i> plainly,' at such a circumstance ... my Ba, it
+ is <SPAN class="sc-ex">shocking</span>! See, I go <i>wholly</i> on the supposition that the real
+ relation is not imagined to exist between us. I so completely could
+ understand a repugnance to trust you to me were the truth known, that,
+ I will confess, I have several times been afraid the very reverse of
+ this occurrence would befall; that your father would have at some time
+ or other thought himself obliged, by the usual feeling of people in
+ such cases, to see me for a few minutes and express some commonplace
+ thanks after the customary mode (just as Capt. Domett sent a heap of
+ unnecessary thanks to me not long ago for sending now a letter now a
+ book to his son in New Zealand&mdash;keeping up the spirits of poor dear
+ Alfred now he is cut off from the world at large)&mdash;and if <i>this</i> had
+ been done, I shall not deny that my heart would have accused
+ me&mdash;unreasonably I <i>know</i> but still, suppression, and reserve, and
+ apprehension&mdash;the whole of <i>that is</i> horrible always! But this way of
+ looking on the endeavour of anybody, however humble, to just preserve
+ your life, remedy in some degree the first, if it <i>was</i> the first,
+ unjustifiable measure,&mdash;this being 'displeased'&mdash;is exactly what I did
+ <i>not</i> calculate upon. Observe, that in this <i>only</i> instance I am able
+ to do as I shall be done by; to take up the arms furnished by the
+ world, the usages of society&mdash;this is monstrous on the <i>world's</i>
+ showing! I say this now that I may never need recur to it&mdash;that you
+ may understand why I keep <i>such</i> entire silence henceforth.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Get but well, keep but <i>as</i> well, and all is easy now. This wonderful
+ winter&mdash;the spring&mdash;the summer&mdash;you will take exercise, go up and down
+ stairs, get strong. <i>I pray you, at your feet, to do this, dearest!</i>
+ Then comes Autumn, with the natural expectations, as after <i>rouge</i> one
+ expects <i>noir</i>: the <i>likelihood</i> of a <i>severe</i> winter after this mild
+ one, which to prevent, you reiterate your demand to go and save your
+ life in Italy, ought you not to do that? And the matters brought to
+ issue, (with even, if possible, less shadow of ground for a refusal
+ than before, if you are <i>well</i>, plainly well enough to bear the
+ voyage) <i>there</i> I <i>will</i> bid you 'be mine in the obvious way'&mdash;if you
+ shall preserve your belief in me&mdash;and you <i>may</i> in much, in all
+ important to you. Mr. Kenyon's praise is undeserved enough, but
+ yesterday Milnes said I was the only literary man he ever knew, <i>tenax
+ propositi</i>, able to make out a life for himself and abide in
+ it&mdash;'for,' he went on, 'you really do live without any of this
+ <i>titillation</i> and fussy dependence upon adventitious excitement of all
+ kinds, they all say they can do without.' That is <i>more</i> true&mdash;and I
+ <i>intend</i> by God's help to live wholly for you; to spend my whole
+ energies in reducing to practice the feeling which occupies me, and in
+ the practical operation of which, the other work I had proposed to do
+ will be found included, facilitated&mdash;I shall be able&mdash;but of this
+ there is plenty time to speak hereafter&mdash;I shall, I believe, be able
+ to do this without even allowing the world to <i>very much</i>
+ misinterpret&mdash;against pure lying there is no defence, but all up to
+ that I hope to hinder or render unimportant&mdash;as you shall know in time
+ and place.
+</p>
+<p>
+ I have written myself grave, but write to <i>me</i>, dear, dearest, and I
+ will answer in a lighter mood&mdash;even now I can say how it was
+ yesterday's hurry happened. I called on Milnes&mdash;who told me Hanmer had
+ broken a bone in his leg and was laid up, so I called on him too&mdash;on
+ Moxon, by the way, (his brother telling me strangely cheering news,
+ from the grimmest of faces, about my books selling and likely to sell
+ ... your wishes, Ba!)&mdash;then in Bond Street about some business with
+ somebody, then on Mrs. Montagu who was out walking all the time, and
+ home too. I found a letter from Mr. Kenyon, perfectly kind, asking me
+ to go on Monday to meet friends, and with yours to-day comes another
+ confirming the choice of the day. How entirely kind he is!
+</p>
+<p>
+ I am very well, much better, indeed&mdash;taking that bath with sensibly
+ good effect, to-night I go to Montagu's again; for shame, having kept
+ away too long.
+</p>
+<p>
+ And the rest shall answer <i>yours</i>&mdash;dear! Not 'much to answer?' And
+ Beethoven, and Painting and&mdash;what <i>is</i> the rest and shall be answered!
+ Bless you, now, my darling&mdash;I love you, ever shall love you, ever be
+ your own.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>E.B.B. to R.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Tuesday Evening.<br>
+[Post-mark, March 4, 1846.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ Yes, but, dearest, you mistake me, or you mistake yourself. I am sure
+ I do not over-care for forms&mdash;it is not my way to do it&mdash;and in this
+ case ... no. Still you must see that here is a fact as well as a form,
+ and involving a frightful quantity of social inconvenience (to use the
+ mildest word) if too hastily entered on. I deny altogether looking
+ for, or 'seeing' any 'security' in it for myself&mdash;it is a mere form
+ for the heart and the happiness: illusions may pass after as before.
+ Still the truth is that if they were to pass with you now, you stand
+ free to act according to the wide-awakeness of your eyes, and to
+ reform your choice ... see! whereas afterward you could not carry out
+ such a reformation while I was alive, even if I helped you. All I
+ could do for you would be to walk away. And you pretend not to see
+ this broad distinction?&mdash;ah. For me I have seen just this and no more,
+ and have felt averse to forestall, to seem to forestall even by an
+ hour, or a word, that stringency of the legal obligation from which
+ there <i>is</i> in a certain sense no redemption. Tie up your drinker under
+ the pour of his nine gallons, and in two minutes he will moan and
+ writhe (as you perfectly know) like a Brinvilliers under the
+ water-torture. That he <i>asked</i> to be tied up, was unwise on his own
+ principle of loving ale. And <i>you</i> sha'n't be 'chained' up, if you
+ were to ask twenty times: if you have found truth or not in the
+ water-well.
+</p>
+<p>
+ You do not see aright what I meant to tell you on another subject. If
+ he was displeased, (and it was expressed by a shadow a mere negation
+ of pleasure) it was not with you as a visitor and my friend. You must
+ not fancy such a thing. It was a sort of instinctive indisposition
+ towards seeing you here&mdash;unexplained to himself, I have no doubt&mdash;of
+ course unexplained, or he would have desired me to receive you never
+ again, <i>that</i> would have been done at once and unscrupulously. But
+ without defining his own feeling, he rather disliked seeing you
+ here&mdash;it just touched one of his vibratory wires, brushed by and
+ touched it&mdash;oh, we understand in this house. He is not a nice
+ observer, but, at intervals very wide, he is subject to
+ lightnings&mdash;call them fancies, sometimes right, sometimes wrong.
+ Certainly it was not in the character of a 'sympathising friend' that
+ you made him a very little cross on Monday. And yet you never were nor
+ will be in danger of being <i>thanked</i>, he would not think of it. For
+ the reserve, the apprehension&mdash;dreadful those things are, and
+ desecrating to one's own nature&mdash;but we did not make this position, we
+ only endure it. The root of the evil is the miserable misconception of
+ the limits and character of parental rights&mdash;it is a mistake of the
+ intellect rather than of the heart. Then, after using one's children
+ as one's chattels for a time, the children drop lower and lower toward
+ the level of the chattels, and the duties of human sympathy to them
+ become difficult in proportion. And (it seems strange to say it, yet
+ it is true) <i>love</i>, he does not conceive of at all. He has feeling, he
+ can be moved deeply, he is capable of affection in a peculiar way, but
+ <i>that</i>, he does not understand, any more than he understands Chaldee,
+ respecting it less of course.
+</p>
+<p>
+ And you fancy that I could propose Italy again? after saying too that
+ I never would? Oh no, no&mdash;yet there is time to think of this, a
+ superfluity of time, ... 'time, times and half a time' and to make
+ one's head swim with leaning over a precipice is not wise. The roar
+ of the world comes up too, as you hear and as I heard from the
+ beginning. There will be no lack of 'lying,' be sure&mdash;'pure lying'
+ too&mdash;and nothing you can do, dearest dearest, shall hinder my being
+ torn to pieces by most of the particularly affectionate friends I have
+ in the world. Which I do not think of much, any more than of Italy.
+ You will be mad, and I shall be bad ... and <i>that</i> will be the effect
+ of being poets! 'Till when, where are you?'&mdash;why in the very deepest
+ of my soul&mdash;wherever in it is the fountain head of loving! beloved,
+ <i>there</i> you are!
+</p>
+<p>
+ Some day I shall ask you 'in form,'&mdash;as I care so much for forms, it
+ seems,&mdash;what your 'faults' are, these immense multitudinous faults of
+ yours, which I hear such talk of, and never, never, can get to see.
+ Will you give me a catalogue raisonnée of your faults? I should like
+ it, I think. In the meantime they seem to be faults of obscurity, that
+ is, invisible faults, like those in the poetry which do not keep it
+ from selling as I am <i>so, so</i> glad to understand. I am glad too that
+ Mr. Milnes knows you a little.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Now I must end, there is no more time to-night. God bless you, very
+ dearest! Keep better ... try to be well&mdash;as <i>I</i> do for you since you
+ ask me. Did I ever think that <i>you</i> would think it worth while to ask
+ me <i>that</i>? What a dream! reaching out into the morning! To-day however
+ I did not go down-stairs, because it was colder and the wind blew its
+ way into the passages:&mdash;if I can to-morrow without risk, I will, ...
+ be sure ... be sure. Till Thursday then!&mdash;till eternity!
+</p>
+<p>
+ 'Till when, where am I,' but with you? and what, but yours
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">Your&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right"><SPAN class="sc-ex">Ba</span>.
+</p>
+<p>
+ I have been writing 'autographs' (save my <i>mark</i>) for the North and
+ the South to-day ... the Fens, and Golden Square. Somebody asked for
+ a verse, ... from either 'Catarina' or 'Flush' ... 'those poems' &amp;c.
+ &amp;c.! Such a concatenation of criticisms. So I preferred Flush of
+ course&mdash;i.e. gave him the preferment.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>R.B. to E.B.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Wednesday Morning.<br>
+[Post-mark, March 4, 1846.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ Ah, sweetest, don't mind people and their lies any more than I shall;
+ if the toad <i>does</i> 'take it into his toad's head to spit at you'&mdash;you
+ will not 'drop dead,' I warrant. All the same, if one may make a
+ circuit through a flower-bed and see the less of his toad-habits and
+ general ugliness, so much the better&mdash;no words can express my entire
+ indifference (far below <i>contempt</i>) for what can be said or done. But
+ one thing, only one, I choose to hinder being said, if I can&mdash;the
+ others I would not if I could&mdash;why prevent the toad's puffing himself
+ out thrice his black bigness if it amuses him among those wet stones?
+ We shall be in the sun.
+</p>
+<p>
+ I dare say I am unjust&mdash;hasty certainly, in the other matter&mdash;but all
+ faults are such inasmuch as they are 'mistakes of the
+ intellect'&mdash;toads may spit or leave it alone,&mdash;but if I ever see it
+ right, exercising my intellect, to treat any human beings like my
+ 'chattels'&mdash;I shall pay for that mistake one day or another, I am
+ convinced&mdash;and I very much fear that you would soon discover what one
+ fault of mine is, if you were to hear anyone assert such a right in my
+ presence.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Well, I shall see you to-morrow&mdash;had I better come a little later, I
+ wonder?&mdash;half-past three, for instance, staying, as last time, till
+ ... ah, it is ill policy to count my treasure aloud! Or shall I come
+ at the usual time to-morrow? If I do <i>not</i> hear, at the usual
+ time!&mdash;because, I think you would&mdash;am sure you would have considered
+ and suggested it, were it necessary.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Bless you, dearest&mdash;ever your own.
+</p>
+<p>
+ I said nothing about that Mr. Russell and his proposition&mdash;by all
+ means, yes&mdash;let him do more good with that noble, pathetic 'lay'&mdash;and
+ do not mind the 'burthen,' if he is peremptory&mdash;so that he duly
+ specify '<i>by the singer</i>'&mdash;with <i>that</i> precaution nothing but good can
+ come of his using it.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>E.B.B. to R.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Thursday.<br>
+[Post-mark, March 6, 1846.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ Ever dearest I lose no time in writing, you see, so as to be written
+ to at the soonest&mdash;and there is another reason which makes me hasten
+ to write ... it is not all mercantile calculation. I want you to
+ understand me.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Now listen! I seem to understand myself: it seems to me that every
+ word I ever said to you on one subject, is plainly referable to a
+ class of feelings of which you could not complain ... could not. But
+ this is <i>my</i> impression; and yours is different:&mdash;you do not
+ understand, you do not see by my light, and perhaps it is natural that
+ you should not, as we stand on different steps of the argument. Still
+ I, who said what I did, <i>for you</i>, and from an absorbing consideration
+ of what was best <i>for you</i>, cannot consent, even out of anxiety for
+ your futurity, to torment you now, to vex you by a form of speech
+ which you persist in translating into a want of trust in you ... (<i>I</i>,
+ want trust in you!!) into a need of more evidence about you from
+ others ... (<i>could</i> you say so?) and even into an indisposition on my
+ part to fulfil my engagement&mdash;no, dearest dearest, it is not right of
+ you. And therefore, as you have these thoughts reasonably or
+ unreasonably, I shall punish you for them at once, and 'chain' you ...
+ (as you wish to be chained), chain you, rivet you&mdash;do you feel how the
+ little fine chain twists round and round you? do you hear the stroke
+ of the riveting? and you may <i>feel that</i> too. Now, it is done&mdash;now,
+ you are chained&mdash;<i>Bia</i> has finished the work&mdash;I, <i>Ba</i>! (observe the
+ anagram!) and not a word do you say, of Prometheus, though you have
+ the conscience of it all, I dare say. Well! you must be pleased, ...
+ as it was 'the weight of too much liberty' which offended you: and now
+ you believe, perhaps, that I trust you, love you, and look to you over
+ the heads of the whole living world, without any one head needing to
+ stoop; you <i>must</i>, if you please, because you belong to me now and
+ shall believe as I choose. There's a ukase for you! Cry out ... repent
+ ... and I will loose the links, and let you go again&mdash;<i>shall</i> it be
+ '<i>My dear Miss Barrett</i>?'
+</p>
+<p>
+ Seriously, you shall not think of me such things as you half said, if
+ not whole said, to-day. If all men were to speak evil of you, my heart
+ would speak of you the more good&mdash;<i>that</i> would be the one result with
+ <i>me</i>. Do I not know you, soul to soul? should I believe that any of
+ them could know you as I know you? Then for the rest, I am not afraid
+ of 'toads' now, not being a child any longer. I am not inclined to
+ mind, if <i>you</i> do not mind, what may be said about us by the
+ benevolent world, nor will other reasons of a graver kind affect me
+ otherwise than by the necessary pain. Therefore the whole rests with
+ you&mdash;unless illness should intervene&mdash;and you will be kind and good
+ (will you not?) and not think hard thoughts of me ever again&mdash;no. It
+ wasn't the sense of being less than you had a right to pretend to,
+ which made me speak what you disliked&mdash;for it is <i>I</i> who am
+ 'unworthy,' and not another&mdash;not certainly that other!
+</p>
+<p>
+ I meant to write more to-night of subjects farther off us, but my
+ sisters have come up-stairs and I must close my letter quickly.
+ Beloved, take care of your head! Ah, do not write poems, nor read, nor
+ neglect the walking, nor take that shower-bath. <i>Will</i> you, instead,
+ try the warm bathing? Surely the experiment is worth making for a
+ little while. Dearest beloved, do it for your own
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right"><SPAN class="sc-ex">Ba</span>.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>R.B. to E.B.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Friday Morning.<br>
+[Post-mark, March 6, 1846.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ I am altogether your own, dearest&mdash;the words were only words and the
+ playful feelings were play&mdash;while the <i>fact</i> has always been so
+ irresistibly obvious as to make them <i>break</i> on and off it,
+ fantastically like water turning to spray and spurts of foam on a
+ great solid rock. <i>Now</i> you call the rock, a rock, but you must have
+ known what chance you had of pushing it down when you sent all those
+ light fancies and free-leaves, and refusals-to-hold-responsible, to do
+ what they could. It <i>is</i> a rock; and may be quite barren of good to
+ you,&mdash;not large enough to build houses on, not small enough to make a
+ mantelpiece of, much less a pedestal for a statue, but it is real
+ rock, that is all.
+</p>
+<p>
+ It is always <i>I</i> who 'torment' <i>you</i>&mdash;instead of taking the present
+ and blessing you, and leaving the future to its own cares. I certainly
+ am not apt to look curiously into what next week is to bring, much
+ less next month or six months, but you, the having you, my own,
+ dearest beloved, <i>that</i> is as different in kind as in degree from any
+ other happiness or semblance of it that even seemed possible of
+ realization. Then, now, the health is all to stay, or retard us&mdash;oh,
+ be well, my Ba!
+</p>
+<p>
+ Let me speak of that letter&mdash;I am ashamed at having mentioned those
+ circumstances, and should not have done so, but for their
+ insignificance&mdash;for I knew that if you ever <i>did</i> hear of them, all
+ any body <i>would</i> say would not amount to enough to be repeated to me
+ and so get explained at once. Now that the purpose is gained, it seems
+ little worth gaining. You bade me not send the letter: I will not.
+</p>
+<p>
+ As for 'what people say'&mdash;ah&mdash;Here lies a book, Bartoli's 'Simboli'
+ and this morning I dipped into his Chapter XIX. His 'Symbol' is
+ 'Socrate fatto ritrar su' Boccali' and the theme of his dissertating,
+ 'L'indegnità del mettere in disprezzo i più degni filosofi
+ dell'antichità.' He sets out by enlarging on the horror of it&mdash;then
+ describes the character of Socrates, then tells the story of the
+ representation of the 'Clouds,'and thus gets to his 'symbol'&mdash;'le
+ pazzie fatte spacciare a Socrate in quella commedia ... il misero in
+ tanto scherno e derisione del pubblico, che perfino i vasai
+ dipingevano il suo ritratto sopra gli orci, i fiaschi, i boccali, e
+ ogni vasellamento da più vile servigio. Così quel sommo filosofo ...
+ fu condotto a far di se par le case d'Atene una continua commedia, con
+ solamente vederlo comparir così scontraffatto e ridicolo, come i vasai
+ sel formavano d'invenzione'&mdash;
+</p>
+<p>
+ There you have what a very clever man can say in choice Tuscan on a
+ passage in Ælian which he takes care not to quote nor allude to, but
+ which is the sole authority for the fact. Ælian, speaking of Socrates'
+ magnanimity, says that on the first representation, a good many
+ foreigners being present who were at a loss to know 'who could be this
+ Socrates'&mdash;the sage himself stood up that he might be pointed out to
+ them by the auditory at large ... 'which' says Ælian&mdash;'was no
+ difficulty for them, to whom his features were most familiar,&mdash;<i>the
+ very potters being in the habit of decorating their vessels with his
+ likeness</i>'&mdash;no doubt out of a pleasant and affectionate admiration.
+ Yet see how 'people' can turn this out of its sense,&mdash;'say' their say
+ on the simplest, plainest word or deed, and change it to its opposite!
+ 'God's great gift of speech abused' indeed!
+</p>
+<p>
+ But what shall we hear of it <i>there</i>, my Siren?
+</p>
+<p>
+ On Monday&mdash;is it not? <i>Who</i> was it looked into the room just at our
+ leave-taking?
+</p>
+<p>
+ Bless you, my ever dearest,&mdash;remember to walk, to go down-stairs&mdash;and
+ be sure that I will endeavour to get well for my part. To-day I am
+ very well&mdash;with this letter!
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">Your own.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>E.B.B. to R.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Friday Evening.<br>
+[Post-mark, March 7, 1846.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ Always <i>you</i>, is it, who torments me? always <i>you</i>? Well! I agree to
+ bear the torments as Socrates his persecution by the potters:&mdash;and by
+ the way he liked those potters, as Plato shows, and was fain to go to
+ them for his illustrations ... as I to you for all my light. Also,
+ while we are on the subject, I will tell you another fault of your
+ Bartoli ... his 'choice Tuscan' filled one of my pages, in the place
+ of my English better than Tuscan.
+</p>
+<p>
+ For the letter you mentioned, I meant to have said in mine yesterday,
+ that I was grateful to you for telling me of it&mdash;<i>that</i> was one of the
+ prodigalities of your goodness to me ... not thrown away, in one
+ sense, however superfluous. Do you ever think how I must feel when you
+ overcome me with all this generous tenderness, only beloved! I cannot
+ say it.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Because it is colder to-day I have not been down-stairs but let
+ to-morrow be warm enough&mdash;<i>facilis descensus</i>. There's something
+ infernal to me really, in the going down, and now too that our cousin
+ is here! Think of his beginning to attack Henrietta the other day....
+ '<i>So</i> Mr. C. has retired and left the field to Surtees Cook. Oh ...
+ you needn't deny ... it's the news of all the world except your
+ father. And as to <i>him</i>, I don't blame you&mdash;he never will consent to
+ the marriage of son or daughter. Only you should consider, you know,
+ because he won't leave you a shilling, &amp;c. &amp;c....' You hear the sort
+ of man. And then in a minute after ... 'And what is this about Ba?'
+ 'About Ba' said my sisters, 'why who has been persuading you of such
+ nonsense?' 'Oh, my authority is very good,&mdash;perfectly unnecessary for
+ you to tell any stories, Arabel,&mdash;a literary friendship, is it?' ...
+ and so on ... after that fashion! This comes from my brothers of
+ course, but we need not be afraid of its passing <i>beyond</i>, I think,
+ though I was a good deal vexed when I heard first of it last night and
+ have been in cousinly anxiety ever since to get our Orestes safe away
+ from those Furies his creditors, into Brittany again. He is an
+ intimate friend of my brothers besides the relationship, and they talk
+ to him as to each other, only they oughtn't to have talked <i>that</i>, and
+ without knowledge too.
+</p>
+<p>
+ I forgot to tell you that Mr. Kenyon was in an immoderate joy the day
+ I saw him last, about Mr. Poe's 'Raven' as seen in the <i>Athenæum</i>
+ extracts, and came to ask what I knew of the poet and his poetry, and
+ took away the book. It's the rhythm which has taken him with 'glamour'
+ I fancy. Now you will stay on Monday till the last moment, and go to
+ him for dinner at six.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Who 'looked in at the door?' Nobody. But Arabel a little way opened
+ it, and hearing your voice, went back. There was no harm&mdash;<i>is</i> no fear
+ of harm. Nobody in the house would find his or her pleasure in running
+ the risk of giving me pain. I mean my brothers and sisters would not.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Are you trying the music to charm the brain to stillness? Tell me. And
+ keep from that 'Soul's Tragedy' which did so much harm&mdash;oh, that I had
+ bound you by some Stygian oath not to touch it.
+</p>
+<p>
+ So my rock ... may the birds drop into your crevices the seeds of all
+ the flowers of the world&mdash;only it is not for <i>those</i>, that I cling to
+ you as the single rock in the salt sea.
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">Ever I am&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">Your own.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>R.B. to E.B.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Saturday Morning.<br>
+[Post-mark, March 7, 1846.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ You call me 'kind'; and by this time I have no heart to call you such
+ names&mdash;I told you, did I not once? that 'Ba' had got to convey
+ infinitely more of you to my sense than 'dearest,' 'sweetest,' all or
+ any epithets that break down with their load of honey like bees&mdash;to
+ say you are 'kind,' you that so entirely and unintermittingly bless
+ me,&mdash;it will never do now, 'Ba.' All the same, one way there is to
+ make even 'Ba' dearer,&mdash;'<i>my</i> Ba,' I say to myself!
+</p>
+<p>
+ About my <i>fears</i>&mdash;whether of opening doors or entering people&mdash;one
+ thing is observable and prevents the possibility of any
+ misconception&mdash;I desire, have been in the habit of desiring, to
+ <i>increase</i> them, far from diminishing&mdash;they relate, of course,
+ entirely to <i>you</i>&mdash;and only through <i>you</i> affect me the least in the
+ world. Put your well-being out of the question, so far as I can
+ understand it to be involved,&mdash;and the pleasure and pride I should
+ immediately choose would be that the whole world knew our position.
+ What pleasure, what pride! But I endeavour to remember on all
+ occasions&mdash;and perhaps succeed in too few&mdash;that it is very easy for me
+ to go away and leave you who cannot go. I only allude to this because
+ some people are 'naturally nervous' and all that&mdash;and I am quite of
+ another kind.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Last evening I went out&mdash;having been kept at home in the afternoon to
+ see somebody ... went walking for hours. I am quite well to-day and,
+ now your letter comes, my Ba, most happy. And, as the sun shines, you
+ are perhaps making the perilous descent now, while I write&mdash;oh, to
+ meet you on the stairs! And I shall really see you on Monday, dearest?
+ So soon, it ought to feel, considering the dreary weeks that now get
+ to go between our days! For music, I made myself melancholy just now
+ with some 'Concertos for the Harpsichord by Mr. Handel'&mdash;brought home
+ by my father the day before yesterday;&mdash;what were light, modern things
+ once! Now I read not very long ago a French memoir of 'Claude le
+ Jeune' called in his time the Prince of Musicians,&mdash;no,
+ '<i>Phoenix</i>'&mdash;the unapproachable wonder to all time&mdash;that is, twenty
+ years after his death about&mdash;and to this pamphlet was prefixed as
+ motto this startling axiom&mdash;'In Music, the Beau Ideal changes every
+ thirty years'&mdash;well, is not that <i>true</i>? The <i>Idea</i>, mind,
+ changes&mdash;the general standard ... so that it is no answer that a
+ single air, such as many one knows, may strike as freshly as
+ ever&mdash;they were <i>not</i> according to the Ideal of their own time&mdash;just
+ now, they drop into the ready ear,&mdash;next hundred years, who will be
+ the Rossini? who is no longer the Rossini even I remember&mdash;his early
+ overtures are as purely Rococo as Cimarosa's or more. The sounds
+ remain, keep their character perhaps&mdash;the scale's proportioned notes
+ affect the same, that is,&mdash;the major third, or minor seventh&mdash;but the
+ arrangement of these, the sequence the law&mdash;for them, if it <i>should</i>
+ change every thirty years! To Corelli nothing seemed so conclusive in
+ Heaven or earth as this
+</p>
+<center>
+<img src="images/image06.png" width="400" height="78"
+alt="Music ">
+</center>
+<!--IMAGE END-->
+<p>
+ I don't believe there is one of his sonatas wherein that formula does
+ not do duty. In these things of Handel that seems replaced by
+</p>
+<center>
+<img src="images/image07.png" width="466" height="95"
+alt="Music ">
+</center>
+<!--IMAGE END-->
+<p style="text-indent: 0em">&mdash;that was the only true consummation! Then,&mdash;to go over the hundred
+ years,&mdash;came Rossini's unanswerable coda:
+</p>
+<center>
+<img src="images/image08.png" width="550" height="187"
+alt="Music ">
+</center>
+<!--IMAGE END-->
+<p style="text-indent: 0em">which serves as base to the infinity of songs, gone, gone&mdash;<i>so</i> gone
+ by! From all of which Ba draws <i>this</i> 'conclusion' that these may be
+ worse things than Bartoli's Tuscan to cover a page with!&mdash;yet, yet the
+ pity of it! Le Jeune, the Phoenix, and Rossini who directed his
+ letters to his mother as 'mother of the famous composer'&mdash;and Henry
+ Lawes, and Dowland's Lute, ah me!
+</p>
+<p>
+ Well, my conclusion is the best, the everlasting, here and I trust
+ elsewhere&mdash;I am your own, my Ba, ever your
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">R.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>E.B.B. to R.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Tuesday Morning.<br>
+[Post-mark, March 10, 1846.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ Now I shall know what to believe when you talk of very bad and very
+ indifferent doings of yours. Dearest, I read your 'Soul's Tragedy'
+ last night and was quite possessed with it, and fell finally into a
+ mute wonder how you could for a moment doubt about publishing it. It
+ is very vivid, I think, and vital, and impressed me more than the
+ first act of 'Luria' did, though I do not mean to compare such
+ dissimilar things, and for pure nobleness 'Luria' is
+ unapproachable&mdash;will prove so, it seems to me. But this 'Tragedy'
+ shows more heat from the first, and then, the words beat down more
+ closely ... well! I am struck by it all as you see. If you keep it up
+ to this passion, if you justify this high key-note, it is a great
+ work, and worthy of a place next 'Luria.' Also do observe how
+ excellently balanced the two will be, and how the tongue of this next
+ silver Bell will swing from side to side. And <i>you</i> to frighten me
+ about it. Yes, and the worst is (because it was stupid in me) the
+ worst is that I half believed you and took the manuscript to be
+ something inferior&mdash;for <i>you</i>&mdash;and the adviseableness of its
+ publication, a doubtful case. And yet, after all, the really worst is,
+ that you should prove yourself such an adept at deceiving! For can it
+ be possible that the same
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: center">'Robert Browning'</p>
+<p style="text-indent: 0em">who (I heard the other day) said once that he could 'wait three
+ hundred years,' should not feel the life of centuries in this work
+ too&mdash;can it be? Why all the pulses of the life of it are beating in
+ even <i>my</i> ears!
+</p>
+<p>
+ Tell me, beloved, how you are&mdash;I shall hear it to-night&mdash;shall I not?
+ To think of your being unwell, and forced to go here and go there to
+ visit people to whom your being unwell falls in at best among the
+ secondary evils!&mdash;makes me discontented&mdash;which is one shade more to
+ the uneasiness I feel. Will you take care, and not give away your life
+ to these people? Because I have a better claim than they ... and shall
+ put it in, if provoked ... <i>shall</i>. Then you will not use the
+ shower-bath again&mdash;you promise? I dare say Mr. Kenyon observed
+ yesterday how unwell you were looking&mdash;tell me if he didn't! Now do
+ not work, dearest! Do not think of Chiappino, leave him behind ... he
+ has a good strong life of his own, and can wait for you. Oh&mdash;but let
+ me remember to say of him, that he and the other personages appear to
+ me to articulate with perfect distinctness and clearness ... you need
+ not be afraid of having been obscure in this first part. It is all as
+ lucid as noon.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Shall I go down-stairs to-day? 'No' say the privy-councillors,
+ 'because it is cold,' but I <i>shall</i> go peradventure, because the sun
+ brightens and brightens, and the wind has gone round to the west.
+</p>
+<p>
+ George had come home yesterday before you left me, but the stars were
+ favourable to us and kept him out of this room. Now he is at
+ Worcester&mdash;went this morning, on those never ending 'rounds,' poor
+ fellow, which weary him I am sure.
+</p>
+<p>
+ And why should music and the philosophy of it make you 'melancholy,'
+ ever dearest, more than the other arts, which each has the seal of the
+ age, modifying itself after a fashion and <i>to</i> one? Because it changes
+ more, perhaps. Yet all the Arts are mediators between the soul and the
+ Infinite, ... shifting always like a mist, between the Breath on this
+ side, and the Light on that side ... shifted and coloured; mediators,
+ messengers, projected from the Soul, to go and feel, for Her, <i>out
+ there</i>!
+</p>
+<p>
+ You don't call me 'kind' I confess&mdash;but then you call me 'too kind'
+ which is nearly as bad, you must allow on your part. Only you were not
+ in earnest when you said <i>that</i>, as it appeared afterward. <i>Were</i> you,
+ yesterday, in pretending to think that I owed you nothing ... <i>I</i>?
+</p>
+<p>
+ May God bless you. He knows that to give myself to you, is not to pay
+ you. Such debts are not so paid.
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">Yet I am your</p>
+<p style="text-align: right"><SPAN class="sc-ex">Ba</span>.
+</p>
+<p>
+ <i>People's Journal</i> for March 7th.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>R.B. to E.B.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Tuesday Morning.<br>
+[Post-mark, March 10, 1846.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ Dear, dear Ba, if you were here I should not much <i>speak</i> to you, not
+ at first&mdash;nor, indeed, at last,&mdash;but as it is, sitting alone, only
+ words can be spoken, or (worse) written, and, oh how different to look
+ into the eyes and imagine what <i>might</i> be said, what ought to be said,
+ though it never can be&mdash;and to sit and say and write, and only imagine
+ who looks above me, looks down, understanding and pardoning all! My
+ love, my Ba, the fault you found once with some expressions of mine
+ about the amount of imperishable pleasures already hoarded in my mind,
+ the indestructible memories of you; that fault, which I refused to
+ acquiesce under the imputation of, at first, you remember&mdash;well,
+ <i>what</i> a fault it was, by this better light! If all stopped here and
+ now; horrible! complete oblivion were the thing to be prayed for,
+ rather! As it is, <i>now</i>, I must go on, must live the life out, and die
+ yours. And you are doing your utmost to advance the event of
+ events,&mdash;the exercise, and consequently (is it not?) necessarily
+ improved sleep, and the projects for the fine days, the walking ... a
+ pure bliss to think of! Well, now&mdash;I think I shall show seamanship of
+ a sort, and 'try another tack'&mdash;do not be over bold, my sweetest; the
+ cold <i>is</i> considerable,&mdash;taken into account the previous mildness. One
+ ill-advised (I, the <i>adviser</i>, I should remember!) too early, or too
+ late descent to the drawing-room, and all might be ruined,&mdash;thrown
+ back so far ... seeing that our flight is to be prayed for 'not in the
+ winter'&mdash;and one would be called on to wait, wait&mdash;in this world where
+ nothing waits, rests, as can be counted on. Now think of this, too,
+ dearest, and never mind the slowness, for the sureness' sake! How
+ perfectly happy I am as you stand by me, as yesterday you stood, as
+ you seem to stand now!
+</p>
+<p>
+ I will write to-morrow more: I came home last night with a head rather
+ worse; which in the event was the better, for I took a little medicine
+ and all is very much improved to-day. I shall go out presently, and
+ return very early and take as much care as is proper&mdash;for I thought of
+ Ba, and the sublimities of Duty, and that gave myself airs of
+ importance, in short, as I looked at my mother's inevitable arrow-root
+ this morning. So now I am well; so now, is dearest Ba well? I shall
+ hear to-night ... which will have its due effect, that circumstance,
+ in quickening my retreat from Forster's Rooms. All was very pleasant
+ last evening&mdash;and your letter &amp;c. went <i>à qui de droit</i>, and Mr. W.
+ <i>Junior</i> had to smile good-naturedly when Mr. Burges began laying down
+ this general law, that the sons of all men of genius were poor
+ creatures&mdash;and Chorley and I exchanged glances after the fashion of
+ two Augurs meeting at some street-corner in Cicero's time, as he says.
+ And Mr. Kenyon was kind, kinder, kindest, as ever, 'and thus ends a
+ wooing'!&mdash;no, a dinner&mdash;my wooing ends never, never; and so prepare
+ to be asked to give, and give, and give till all is given in Heaven!
+ And all I give <i>you</i> is just my heart's blessing; God bless you, my
+ dearest, dearest Ba!
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>E.B.B. to R.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Tuesday Evening.<br>
+[Post-mark, March 11, 1846.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ You find my letter I trust, for it was written this morning in time;
+ and if these two lines should not be flattery ... oh, rank flattery!
+ ... why happy letter is it, to help to bring you home ten minutes
+ earlier, when you never ought to have left home&mdash;no, indeed! I knew
+ how it would be yesterday, and how you would be worse and not better.
+ You are not fit to go out, dear dearest, to sit in the glare of lights
+ and talk and listen, and have the knives and forks to rattle all the
+ while and remind you of the chains of necessity. Oh&mdash;should I bear it,
+ do you think? I was thinking, when you went away&mdash;<i>after</i> you had
+ quite gone. You would laugh to see me at my dinner&mdash;Flush and
+ me&mdash;Flush placing in me such an heroic confidence, that, after he has
+ cast one discriminating glance on the plate, and, in the case of
+ 'chicken,' wagged his tail with an emphasis, ... he goes off to the
+ sofa, shuts his eyes and allows a full quarter of an hour to pass
+ before he returns to take his share. Did you ever hear of a dog before
+ who did not persecute one with beseeching eyes at mealtimes? And
+ remember, this is not the effect of <i>discipline</i>. Also if another than
+ myself happens to take coffee or break bread in the room here, he
+ teazes straightway with eyes and paws, ... teazes like a common dog
+ and is put out of the door before he can be quieted by scolding. But
+ with <i>me</i> he is sublime! Moreover he has been a very useful dog in his
+ time (in the point of capacity), causing to disappear supererogatory
+ dinners and impossible breakfasts which, to do him justice, is a feat
+ accomplished without an objection on his side, always.
+</p>
+<p>
+ So, when you write me such a letter, I write back to you about Flush.
+ Dearest beloved, but I have read the letter and felt it in my heart,
+ through and through! and it is as wise to talk of Flush foolishly, as
+ to fancy that I <i>could say how</i> it is felt ... this letter! Only when
+ you spoke last of breaking off with such and such recollections, it
+ was the melancholy of the breaking off which I protested against, was
+ it not? and <i>not</i> the insufficiency of the recollections. There might
+ have been something besides in jest. Ah, but <i>you</i> remember, if you
+ please, that <i>I</i> was the first to wish (wishing for my own part, if I
+ could wish exclusively) to break off in the middle the silken thread,
+ and you told me, not&mdash;you forbade me&mdash;do you remember? For, as
+ happiness goes, the recollections were enough, ... <i>are</i> enough for
+ <i>me</i>! I mean that I should acknowledge them to be full compensation
+ for the bitter gift of life, <i>such as it was</i>, to me! if that
+ subject-matter were broken off here! 'Bona verba' let me speak
+ nevertheless. You mean, you say, to run all risks with me, and I don't
+ mean to draw back from my particular risk of ... what am I to do to
+ you hereafter to make you vexed with me? What is there in marriage to
+ make all these people on every side of us, (who all began, I suppose,
+ by talking of love,) look askance at one another from under the silken
+ mask ... and virtually hate one another through the tyranny of the
+ stronger and the hypocrisy of the weaker party. It never could be so
+ with <i>us</i>&mdash;<i>I know that</i>. But you grow awful to me sometimes with the
+ very excess of your goodness and tenderness, and still, I think to
+ myself, if you do not keep lifting me up quite off the ground by the
+ strong faculty of love in you, I shall not help falling short of the
+ hope you have placed in me&mdash;it must be 'supernatural' of you, to the
+ end! or I fall short and disappoint you. Consider this, beloved. Now
+ if I could put my soul out of my body, just to stand up before you
+ and make it clear.
+</p>
+<p>
+ I did go to the drawing-room to-day ... would ... should ... did. The
+ sun came out, the wind changed ... where was the obstacle? I spent a
+ quarter of an hour in a fearful solitude, listening for knocks at the
+ door, as a ghost-fearer might at midnight, and 'came home' none the
+ worse in any way. Be sure that I shall 'take care' better than you do,
+ and there, is the worst of it all&mdash;for <i>you</i> let people make you ill,
+ and do it yourself upon occasion.
+</p>
+<p>
+ You know from my letter how I found you out in the matter of the
+ 'Soul's Tragedy.' Oh! so bad ... so weak, so unworthy of your name! If
+ some other people were half a quarter as much the contrary!
+</p>
+<p>
+ And so, good-night, dear dearest. In spite of my fine speeches about
+ 'recollections,' I should be unhappy enough to please you, with <i>only
+ those</i> ... without you beside! I could not take myself back from being
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">Your own&mdash;
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>R.B. to E.B.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">[Post-mark, March 11, 1846.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ Dear, dear Ba, but indeed I <i>did</i> return home earlier by two or three
+ good hours than the night before&mdash;and to find <i>no</i> letter,&mdash;none of
+ yours! <i>That</i> was reserved for this morning early, and then a rest
+ came, a silence, over the thoughts of you&mdash;and now again, comes this
+ last note! Oh, my love&mdash;why&mdash;what is it you think to do, or become
+ 'afterward,' that you may fail in and so disappoint me? It is not very
+ unfit that you should thus punish yourself, and that, sinning by your
+ own ambition of growing something beyond my Ba even, you should 'fear'
+ as you say! For, sweet, why wish, why think to alter ever by a line,
+ change by a shade, turn better if that were possible, and so only rise
+ the higher above me, get further from instead of nearer to my heart?
+ What I expect, what I build my future on, am quite, quite prepared to
+ 'risk' everything for,&mdash;is that one belief that you <i>will not alter</i>,
+ will just remain as you are&mdash;meaning by '<i>you</i>,' the love in you, the
+ qualities I have <i>known</i> (for you will stop me, if I do not stop
+ myself) what I have evidence of in every letter, in every word, every
+ look. Keeping these, if it be God's will that the body passes,&mdash;what
+ is that? Write no new letters, speak no new words, look no new
+ looks,&mdash;only tell me, years hence that the present is alive, that what
+ was once, still is&mdash;and I am, must needs be, blessed as ever! You
+ speak of my feeling as if it were a pure speculation&mdash;as if because I
+ <i>see somewhat</i> in you I make a calculation that there must be more to
+ see somewhere or other&mdash;where bdellium is found, the onyx-stone may be
+ looked for in the mystic land of the four rivers! And perhaps ... ah,
+ poor human nature!&mdash;perhaps I <i>do</i> think at times on what <i>may</i> be to
+ find! But what is that to you? I <i>offer</i> for the <i>bdellium</i>&mdash;the other
+ may be found or not found ... what I see glitter on the ground, <i>that</i>
+ will suffice to make me rich as&mdash;rich as&mdash;
+</p>
+<p>
+ So bless you my own Ba! I would not wait for paper, and you must
+ forgive half-sheets, instead of a whole celestial quire to my love and
+ praise. Are you so well? So adventurous? Thank you from my heart of
+ hearts. And I am quite well to-day (and have received a note from
+ Procter <i>just</i> this <i>minute</i> putting off his dinner on account of the
+ death of his wife's sister's husband abroad). Observe <i>this</i> sheet I
+ take as I find&mdash;I mean, that the tear tells of no improper speech
+ repented of&mdash;what English, what sense, what a soul's tragedy! but
+ then, what real, realest love and more than love for my ever dearest
+ Ba possesses her own&mdash;
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>E.B.B. to R.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">[Post-mark, March 12, 1846.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ When my Orpheus writes '<span title="Peri lithôn">&Pi;&epsilon;&rho;&iota; &lambda;&iota;&theta;&omega;&nu;</span>' he makes a great mistake
+ about onyxes&mdash;there is more true onyx in this letter of his that I
+ have just read, than he will ever find in the desert land he goes to.
+ And for what 'glitters on the ground,' it reminds me of the yellow
+ metal sparks found in the Malvern Hills, and how we used to laugh
+ years ago at one of our geological acquaintances, who looked
+ mole-hills up that mountain-range in the scorn of his eyes, saying ...
+ 'Nothing but mica!!' Is anybody to be rich through 'mica', I wonder?
+ through 'Nothing but mica?' 'As rich as&mdash;as rich as' ... <i>Walter the
+ Pennyless</i>?
+</p>
+<p>
+ Dearest, best you are nevertheless, and it is a sorry jest which I can
+ break upon your poverty, with that golden heart of yours so
+ apprehended of mine! Why if I am 'ambitious'&mdash;is it not because you
+ love me as if I were worthier of your love, and that, <i>so</i>, I get
+ frightened of the opening of your eyelids to the <i>un</i>worthiness? 'A
+ little sleep, a little slumber, a little folding of the hands to
+ sleep'&mdash;<i>there</i>, is my 'ambition for afterward.' Oh&mdash;you do not
+ understand how with an unspeakable wonder, an astonishment which keeps
+ me from drawing breath, I look to this Dream, and 'see your face as
+ the face of an angel,' and fear for the vanishing, ... because dreams
+ and angels <i>do</i> pass away in this world. But <i>you</i>, <i>I</i> understand
+ <i>you</i>, and all your goodness past expression, past belief of mine, if
+ I had not known you ... just <i>you</i>. If it will satisfy you that I
+ should know you, love you, love you&mdash;why then indeed&mdash;because I never
+ bowed down to any of the false gods I know the gold from the mica, ...
+ I! 'My own beloved'&mdash;you should have my soul to stand on if it could
+ make you stand higher. Yet you shall not call me 'ambitious.'
+</p>
+<p>
+ To-day I went down-stairs again, and wished to know whether you were
+ walking in your proportion&mdash;and your letter does call you 'better,'
+ whether you walked enough or not, and it bears the Deptford post-mark.
+ On Saturday I shall see how you are looking. So pale you were last
+ time! I know Mr. Kenyon must have observed it, (dear Mr. Kenyon ...
+ for being 'kinder and kindest') and that one of the 'augurs'
+ marvelled at the other! By the way I forgot yesterday to tell you how
+ Mr. Burges's 'apt remark' did amuse me. And Mr. Kenyon who said much
+ the same words to me last week in relation to this very Wordsworth
+ junior, writhed, I am sure, and wished the ingenious observer with the
+ lost plays of Æschylus&mdash;oh, I seem to see Mr. Kenyon's face! He was to
+ have come to tell me how you all behaved at dinner that day, but he
+ keeps away ... you have given him too much to think of perhaps.
+</p>
+<p>
+ I heard from Miss Mitford to-day that Mr. Chorley's hope is at an end
+ in respect to the theatre, and (I must tell you) she praises him
+ warmly for his philosophy and fortitude under the disappointment. How
+ much philosophy does it take,&mdash;please to instruct me,&mdash;in order to the
+ decent bearing of such disasters? Can I fancy one, shorter than you by
+ a whole head of the soul, condescending to '<i>bear</i>' such things? No,
+ indeed.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Be good and kind, and do not work at the 'Tragedy' ... do not.
+</p>
+<p>
+ So you and I have written out all the paper in London! At least, I
+ send and send in vain to have more envelopes 'after my kind,' and the
+ last answer is, that a 'fresh supply will arrive in eight days from
+ Paris, and that in the meanwhile they are quite <i>out</i> in the article.'
+ An awful sign of the times, is this famine of envelopes ... not to
+ speak of the scarcity of little sheets:&mdash;and the augurs look to it all
+ of course.
+</p>
+<p>
+ For <i>my</i> part I think more of Chiappino&mdash;Chiappino holds me fast.
+</p>
+<p>
+ But I must let <i>you</i> go&mdash;it is too late. This dearest letter, which
+ you sent me! I thank you for it with ever so much dumbness. May God
+ bless you and keep you, and make you happy for me.
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">Your <SPAN class="sc-ex">Ba</span>.
+</p>
+<h3><i>R.B. to E.B.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">[Post-mark, March 12, 1846.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ How I get to understand this much of Law&mdash;that prior possession is
+ nine points of it! Just because your infinite adroitness got first
+ hold of the point of view whence our connection looks like 'a dream'
+ ... I find myself shut out of my very own, unable to say what is
+ oftenest in my thought; whereas the dear, miraculous dream <i>you</i> were,
+ and are, my Ba! Only, <i>vanish</i>&mdash;<i>that</i> you will never! My own, and for
+ ever!
+</p>
+<p>
+ Yesterday I read the poor, inconceivably inadequate notice in the
+ <i>People's Journal</i>. How curiously wrong, too, in the personal guesses!
+ Sad work truly. For my old friend Mrs. Adams&mdash;no, I must be silent:
+ the lyrics seem doggerel in its utter purity. And so the people are to
+ be instructed in the new age of gold! I <i>heard</i> two days ago precisely
+ what I told you&mdash;that there was a quarrel, &amp;c. which this service was
+ to smooth over, no doubt. Chorley told me, in a hasty word only, that
+ all was over, Mr. Webster would not have anything to do with his play.
+ The said W. is one of the poorest of poor creatures, and as Chorley
+ was certainly forewarned, forearmed I will hope him to have been
+ likewise&mdash;still it is very disappointing&mdash;he was apparently nearer
+ than most aspirants to the prize,&mdash;having the best will of the
+ actresses on whose shoulder the burthen was to lie. I hope they have
+ been quite honest with him&mdash;knowing as I do the easy process of
+ transferring all sorts of burthens, in that theatrical world, from
+ responsible to irresponsible members of it, actors to manager, manager
+ to actors, as the case requires. And it is a 'hope deferred' with
+ Chorley; not for the second or third time. I am very glad that he
+ cares no more than you tell me.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Still you go down-stairs, and still return safely, and every step
+ leads us nearer to <i>my</i> 'hope.' How unremittingly you bless me&mdash;a
+ visit promises a letter, a letter brings such news, crowns me with
+ such words, and speaks of another visit&mdash;and so the golden links
+ extend. Dearest words, dearest letters&mdash;as I add each to my heap, I
+ say&mdash;I <i>do</i> say&mdash;'I was <i>poor</i>, it now seems, a minute ago, when I had
+ not <i>this</i>!' Bless you, dear, dear Ba. On Saturday I shall be with
+ you, I trust&mdash;may God bless you! Ever your own
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>E.B.B. to R.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Sunday.<br>
+[Post-mark, March 16, 1846.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ Ever dearest I am going to say one word first of all lest I should
+ forget it afterward, of the two or three words which you said
+ yesterday and so passingly that you probably forget to-day having said
+ them at all. We were speaking of Mr. Chorley and his house, and you
+ said that you did not care for such and such things for yourself, but
+ that for others&mdash;now you remember the rest. And I just want to say
+ what it would have been simpler to have said at the time&mdash;only not so
+ easy&mdash;(I <i>couldn't</i> say it at the time) that you are not if you please
+ to fancy that because I am a woman I have not the pretension to do
+ with as little in any way as you yourself ... no, it is not <i>that</i> I
+ mean to say.... I mean that you are not, if you please, to fancy that,
+ because I am a woman, I look to be cared for in those outside things,
+ or should have the slightest pleasure in any of them. So never wish
+ nor regret in your thoughts to be able or not to be able to care this
+ and this for <i>me</i>; for while you are thinking so, our thoughts go
+ different ways, which is wrong. Mr. Fox did me a great deal too much
+ honour in calling me 'a religious hermit'; he was 'curiously' in
+ fault, as you saw. It is not my vocation to sit on a stone in a
+ cave&mdash;I was always too fond of lolling upon sofas or in chairs nearly
+ as large,&mdash;and this, which I sit in, was given to me when I was a
+ child by my uncle, the uncle I spoke of to you once, and has been
+ lolled in nearly ever since ... when I was well enough. Well&mdash;<i>that</i>
+ is a sort of luxury, of course&mdash;but it is more idle than expensive, as
+ a habit, and I do believe that it is the 'head and foot of my
+ offending' in that matter. Yes&mdash;'confiteor tibi' besides, that I do
+ hate white dimity curtains, which is highly improper for a religious
+ hermit of course, but excusable in <i>me</i> who would accept brown serge
+ as a substitute with ever so much indifference. It is the white light
+ which comes in the dimity which is so hateful to me. To 'go mad in
+ white dimity' seems perfectly natural, and consequential even. Set
+ aside these foibles, and one thing is as good as another with me, and
+ the more simplicity in the way of living, the better. If I saw Mr.
+ Chorley's satin sofas and gilded ceilings I should call them very
+ pretty I dare say, but never covet the possession of the like&mdash;it
+ would never enter my mind to do so. Then Papa has not kept a carriage
+ since I have been grown up (they grumble about it here in the house,
+ but when people have once had great reverses they get nervous about
+ spending money) so I shall not miss the Clarence and greys ... and I
+ do entreat you <i>not</i> to put those two ideas together again of <i>me</i> and
+ the finery which has nothing to do with me. I have talked a great deal
+ too much of all this, you will think, but I want you, once for all, to
+ apply it broadly to the whole of the future both in the general view
+ and the details, so that we need not return to the subject. Judge for
+ me as for yourself&mdash;<i>what is good for you is good for me</i>. Otherwise I
+ shall be humiliated, you know; just as far as I know your thoughts.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Mr. Kenyon has been here to-day&mdash;and I have been down-stairs&mdash;two
+ great events! He was in brilliant spirits and sate talking ever so
+ long, and named you as he always does. Something he asked, and then
+ said suddenly ... 'But I don't see why I should ask <i>you</i>, when I
+ ought to know him better than you can.' On which I was wise enough to
+ change colour, as I felt, to the roots of my hair. There is the
+ effect of a bad conscience! and it has happened to me before, with Mr.
+ Kenyon, three times&mdash;once particularly, when I could have cried with
+ vexation (to complete the effects!), he looked at me with such
+ infinite surprise in a dead pause of any speaking. <i>That</i> was in the
+ summer; and all to be said for it now, is, that it couldn't be helped:
+ couldn't!
+</p>
+<p>
+ Mr. Kenyon asked of 'Saul.' (By the way, you never answered about the
+ blue lilies.) He asked of 'Saul' and whether it would be finished in
+ the new number. He hangs on the music of your David. Did you read in
+ the <i>Athenæum</i> how Jules Janin&mdash;no, how the critic on Jules Janin (was
+ it the critic? was it Jules Janin? the glorious confusion is gaining
+ on me I think) has magnificently confounded places and persons in
+ Robert Southey's urn by the Adriatic and devoted friendship for Lord
+ Byron? And immediately the English observer of the phenomenon, after
+ moralizing a little on the crass ignorance of Frenchmen in respect to
+ our literature, goes on to write like an ignoramus himself, on Mme.
+ Charles Reybaud, encouraging that pure budding novelist, who is in
+ fact a hack writer of romances third and fourth rate, of questionable
+ purity enough, too. It does certainly appear wonderful that we should
+ not sufficiently stand abreast here in Europe, to justify and
+ necessitate the establishment of an European review&mdash;journal
+ rather&mdash;(the 'Foreign Review,' so called, touching only the summits of
+ the hills) a journal which might be on a level with the intelligent
+ readers of all the countries of Europe, and take all the rising
+ reputations of each, with the national light on them as they rise,
+ into observation and judgment. If nobody can do this, it is a pity I
+ think to do so much less&mdash;both in France and England&mdash;to snatch up a
+ French book from over the Channel as ever and anon they do in the
+ <i>Athenæum</i>, and say something prodigiously absurd of it, till people
+ cry out 'oh oh' as in the House of Commons.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Oh&mdash;oh&mdash;and how wise I am to-day, as if I were a critic myself!
+ Yesterday I was foolish instead&mdash;for I couldn't get out of my head all
+ the evening how you said that you would come 'to see a candle held up
+ at the window.' Well! but I do not mean to love you any more just
+ now&mdash;so I tell you plainly. Certainly I will not. I love you already
+ too much perhaps. I feel like the turning Dervishes turning in the sun
+ when you say such words to me&mdash;and I <i>never shall</i> love you any
+ 'less,' because it is too much to be made less of.
+</p>
+<p>
+ And you write to-morrow? and will tell me how you are? honestly will
+ tell me? May God bless you, most dear!
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">I am yours&mdash;'Tota tua est'</p>
+<p style="text-align: right"><SPAN class="sc-ex">Ba</span>.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>R.B. to E.B.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Sunday.<br>
+[Post-mark, March 16, 1846.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ How will the love my heart is full of for you, let me be silent?
+ Insufficient speech is better than no speech, in one regard&mdash;the
+ speaker had <i>tried</i> words, and if they fail, hereafter he needs not
+ reflect that he did not even try&mdash;so with me now, that loving you, Ba,
+ with all my heart and soul, all my senses being lost in one wide
+ wondering gratitude and veneration, I press close to you to say so, in
+ this imperfect way, my dear dearest beloved! Why do you not help me,
+ rather than take my words, my proper word, from me and call them
+ yours, when yours they are not? You said lately love of you 'made you
+ humble'&mdash;just as if to hinder <i>me</i> from saying that earnest
+ truth!&mdash;entirely true it is, as I feel ever more convincingly. You do
+ not choose to understand it should be so, nor do I much care, for the
+ one thing you must believe, must resolve to believe in its length and
+ breadth, is that I do love you and live only in the love of you.
+</p>
+<p>
+ I will rest on the confidence that you do so believe! You <i>know</i> by
+ this that it is no shadowy image of you and <i>not</i> you, which having
+ attached myself to in the first instance, I afterward compelled my
+ fancy to see reproduced, so to speak, with tolerable exactness to the
+ original idea, in you, the dearest real <i>you</i> I am blessed with&mdash;you
+ <i>know</i> what the eyes are to me, and the lips and the hair. And I, for
+ my part, know <i>now</i>, while fresh from seeing you, certainly <i>know</i>,
+ whatever I may have said a short time since, that <i>you</i> will go on to
+ the end, that the arm round me will not let me go,&mdash;over such a blind
+ abyss&mdash;I refuse to think, to fancy, <i>towards</i> what it would be to
+ loose you now! So I give my life, my soul into your hand&mdash;the giving
+ is a mere form too, it is yours, ever yours from the first&mdash;but ever
+ as I see you, sit with you, and come away to think over it all, I find
+ more that seems mine to give; you give me more life and it goes back
+ to you.
+</p>
+<p>
+ I shall hear from you to-morrow&mdash;then, I will go out early and get
+ done with some calls, in the joy and consciousness of what waits me,
+ and when I return I will write a few words. Are these letters, these
+ merest attempts at getting to talk with you through the distance&mdash;yet
+ always with the consolation of feeling that you will know all,
+ interpret all and forgive it and put it right&mdash;can such things be
+ cared for, expected, as you say? Then, Ba, my life <i>must</i> be better
+ ... with the closeness to help, and the 'finding out the way' for
+ which love was always noted. If you begin making in fancy a lover to
+ your mind, I am lost at once&mdash;but the one quality of <i>affection</i> for
+ you, which would sooner or later have to be placed on his list of
+ component graces; <i>that</i> I will dare start supply&mdash;the entire love you
+ could dream of <i>is</i> here. You think you see some of the other
+ adornments, and only too many; and you will see plainer one day, but
+ with that I do not concern myself&mdash;you shall admire the true
+ heroes&mdash;but me you shall love for the love's sake. Let me kiss you,
+ you, my dearest, dearest&mdash;God bless you ever&mdash;
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>R.B. to E.B.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">[Post-mark, March 16, 1846.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ Indeed I would, dearest Ba, go with entire gladness and pride to see a
+ light that came from your room&mdash;why should that surprise you? Well,
+ you will <i>know</i> one day.
+</p>
+<p>
+ We understand each other too about the sofas and gilding&mdash;oh, I know
+ you, my own sweetest! For me, if I had set those matters to heart, I
+ should have turned into the obvious way of getting them&mdash;not <i>out</i> of
+ it, as I did resolutely from the beginning. All I meant was, to
+ express a very natural feeling&mdash;if one could give you diamonds for
+ flowers, and if you liked diamonds,&mdash;then, indeed! As it is, wherever
+ we are found shall be, if you please, 'For the love's sake found
+ therein&mdash;sweetest <i>house</i> was ever seen!'
+</p>
+<p>
+ Mr. Kenyon must be merciful. Lilies are of all colours in
+ Palestine&mdash;one sort is particularized as <i>white</i> with a dark blue spot
+ and streak&mdash;the water lily, lotos, which I think I meant, is <i>blue</i>
+ altogether.
+</p>
+<p>
+ I have walked this morning to town and back&mdash;I feel much better,
+ 'honestly'! The head better&mdash;the spirits rising&mdash;as how should they
+ not, when <i>you</i> think all will go well in the end, when you write to
+ me that you go down-stairs and are stronger&mdash;and when the rest is
+ written?
+</p>
+<p>
+ Not more now, dearest, for time is pressing, but you will answer
+ this,&mdash;the love that is not here,&mdash;not the idle words, and I will
+ reply to-morrow. Thursday is so far away yet!
+</p>
+<p>
+ Bless you, my very own, only dearest!
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>E.B.B. to R.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Monday Evening.<br>
+[Post-mark, March 17, 1846.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ Dearest, you are dearest always! Talk of Sirens, ... there must be
+ some masculine ones 'rari nantes,' I fancy, (though we may not find
+ them in unquestionable authorities like your Ælian!) to justify this
+ voice I hear. Ah, how you speak, with that pretension, too, to
+ dumbness! What should people be made of, in order to bear such words,
+ do you think? Will all the wax from all the altar-candles in the
+ Sistine Chapel, keep the piercing danger from their ears? Being tied
+ up a good deal tighter than Ulysses did not save <i>me</i>. Dearest
+ dearest: I laugh, you see, as usual, not to cry! But deep down, deeper
+ than the Sirens go, deep underneath the tides, <i>there</i>, I bless and
+ love you with the voice that makes no sound.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Other human creatures (how often I do think it to myself!) have their
+ good things scattered over their lives, sown here and sown there, down
+ the slopes, and by the waysides. But with me ... I have mine all
+ poured down on one spot in the midst of the sands!&mdash;if you knew what I
+ feel at moments, and at half-hours, when I give myself up to the
+ feeling freely and take no thought of red eyes. A woman once was
+ killed with gifts, crushed with the weight of golden bracelets thrown
+ at her: and, knowing myself, I have wondered more than a little, how
+ it was that I could <i>bear</i> this strange and unused gladness, without
+ sinking as the emotion rose. Only I was incredulous at first, and the
+ day broke slowly ... and the gifts fell like the rain ... softly; and
+ God gives strength, by His providence, for sustaining blessings as
+ well as stripes. Dearest&mdash;
+</p>
+<p>
+ For the rest I understand you perfectly&mdash;perfectly. It was simply to
+ your <i>thoughts</i>, that I replied ... and that you need not say to
+ yourself any more, as you did once to me when you brought me flowers,
+ that you wished they were diamonds. It was simply to prevent the
+ accident of such a <i>thought</i>, that I spoke out mine. You would not
+ wish accidentally that you had a double-barrelled gun to give me, or a
+ cardinal's hat, or a snuff box, and I meant to say that you <i>might as
+ well</i>&mdash;as diamonds and satin sofas à la Chorley. Thoughts are
+ something, and <i>your</i> thoughts are something more. To be sure they
+ are!
+</p>
+<p>
+ You are better you say, which makes me happy of course. And you will
+ not make the 'better' worse again by doing wrong things&mdash;<i>that</i> is my
+ petition. It was the excess of goodness to write those two letters for
+ me in one day, and I thank you, thank you. Beloved, when you write,
+ <i>let</i> it be, if you choose, ever so few lines. Do not suffer me (for
+ my own sake) to tire you, because two lines or three bring <i>you</i> to me
+ ... remember ... just as a longer letter would.
+</p>
+<p>
+ But where, pray, did I say, and when, that 'everything would end
+ well?' Was <i>that</i> in the dream, when we two met on the stairs? I did
+ not really say so I think. And 'well' is how you understand it. If you
+ jump out of the window you succeed in getting to the ground, somehow,
+ dead or alive ... but whether <i>that</i> means 'ending well,' depends on
+ your way of considering matters. I am seriously of opinion
+ nevertheless, that if 'the arm,' you talk of, <i>drops</i>, it will not be
+ for weariness nor even for weakness, but because it is cut off at the
+ shoulder. <i>I</i> will not fail to you,&mdash;may God so deal with me, so bless
+ me, so leave me, as I live only for you and <i>shall</i>. Do you doubt
+ <i>that</i>, my only beloved! Ah, you know well&mdash;<i>too well</i>, people would
+ say ... but I do not think it 'too well' myself, ... knowing <i>you</i>.
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">Your&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right"><SPAN class="sc-ex">Ba</span>.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Here is a gossip which Mr. Kenyon brought me on Sunday&mdash;disbelieving
+ it himself, he asseverated, though Lady Chantrey said it 'with
+ authority,'&mdash;that Mr. Harness had offered his hand heart and
+ ecclesiastical dignities to Miss Burdett Coutts. It is Lady Chantrey's
+ and Mr. Kenyon's <i>secret</i>, remember.
+</p>
+<p>
+ And ... will you tell me? How can a man spend four or five successive
+ months on the sea, most cheaply&mdash;at the least pecuniary expense, I
+ mean? Because Miss Mitford's friend Mr. Buckingham is ordered by his
+ medical adviser to complete his cure by these means; and he is not
+ rich. Could he go with sufficient comfort by a merchant's vessel to
+ the Mediterranean ... and might he drift about among the Greek
+ islands?
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>R.B. to E.B.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Tuesday.
+</p>
+<p>
+ 'Out of window' would be well, as I see the leap, if it ended (<i>so far
+ as I am concerned</i>) in the worst way imaginable&mdash;I would I 'run the
+ risk' (Ba's other word) rationally, deliberately,&mdash;knowing what the
+ ordinary law of chances in this world justifies in such a case; and if
+ the result after all <i>was</i> unfortunate, it would be far easier to
+ undergo the extremest penalty with so little to reproach myself
+ for,&mdash;than to put aside the adventure,&mdash;waive the wondrous probability
+ of such best fortune, in a fear of the barest possibility of an
+ adverse event, and so go to my grave, Walter the Penniless, with an
+ eternal recollection that Miss Burdett Coutts once offered to wager
+ sundry millions with me that she could throw double-sixes a dozen
+ times running&mdash;which wager I wisely refused to accept because it was
+ not written in the stars that such a sequence might never be. I had
+ rather, rather a thousand-fold lose my paltry stake, and be the one
+ recorded victim to such an unexampled unluckiness that half a dozen
+ mad comets, suns gone wrong, and lunatic moons must have come
+ laboriously into conjunction for my special sake to bring it to pass,
+ which were no slight honour, properly considered!&mdash;And this is <i>my</i>
+ way of laughing, dearest Ba, when the excess of belief in you, and
+ happiness with you, runs over and froths if it don't
+ sparkle&mdash;underneath is a deep, a sea not to be moved. But chance,
+ chance! there is <i>no</i> chance here! I <i>have</i> gained enough for my life,
+ I can only put in peril the gaining more than enough. You shall change
+ altogether my dear, dearest love, and I will be happy to the last
+ minute on what I can remember of this past year&mdash;I <i>could</i> do that.
+ <i>Now</i>, jump with me out, Ba! If you feared for yourself&mdash;all would be
+ different, sadly different&mdash;But saying what you do say, promising 'the
+ strength of arm'&mdash;do not wonder that I call it an assurance of all
+ being 'well'! All is <i>best</i>, as you promise&mdash;dear, darling Ba!&mdash;and I
+ say, in my degree, with all the energy of my nature, <i>as you say</i>,
+ promise as you promise&mdash;only meaning a worship of you that is solely
+ fit for me, fit by position&mdash;are not you my 'mistress?' Come, some
+ good out of those old conventions, in which you lost faith after the
+ Bower's disappearance, (it was carried by the singing angels, like the
+ house at Loretto, to the Siren's isle where we shall find it preserved
+ in a beauty 'very rare and absolute')&mdash;is it not right you should be
+ my Lady, my Queen? and you are, and ever must be, dear Ba. Because I
+ am suffered to kiss the lips, shall I ever refuse to embrace the feet?
+ and kiss lips, and embrace feet, love you <i>wholly</i>, my Ba! May God
+ bless you&mdash;
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">Ever your own,</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">R.
+</p>
+<p>
+ It would be easy for Mr. Buckingham to find a Merchant-ship bound for
+ some Mediterranean port, after a week or two in harbour, to another
+ and perhaps a third&mdash;Naples, Palermo, Syra, Constantinople, and so on.
+ The expense would be very trifling, but the want of comfort <i>enormous</i>
+ for an invalid&mdash;the one advantage is the solitariness of the <i>one</i>
+ passenger among all those rough new creatures. <i>I</i> like it much, and
+ soon get deep into their friendship, but another has other ways of
+ viewing matters. No one article provided by the ship in the way of
+ provisions can anybody touch. Mr. B. must lay in his own stock, and
+ the horrors of dirt and men's ministry are portentous, yet by a little
+ arrangement beforehand much might be done. Still, I only know my own
+ powers of endurance, and counsel nobody to gain my experience. On the
+ other hand, were all to do again, I had rather have seen Venice <i>so</i>,
+ with the five or six weeks' absolute rest of the mind's eyes, than any
+ other imaginable way,&mdash;except Balloon-travelling.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Do you think they meant Landor's 'Count Julian'&mdash;the 'subject of his
+ tragedy' sure enough,&mdash;and that <i>he</i> was the friend of Southey? So it
+ struck me&mdash;
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>E.B.B. to R.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Tuesday Evening.<br>
+[Post-mark, March 18, 1846.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ Ah well&mdash;we shall see. Only remember that it is not my fault if I
+ throw the double sixes, and if you, on [<i>some sun-shiny</i> day, (a day
+ too late to help yourself) stand face to face with a milkwhite
+ unicorn.]<b><a href="#note-26">26</a></b> Ah&mdash;do not be angry. It is ungrateful of me to write
+ so&mdash;I put a line through it to prove I have a conscience after all. I
+ know that you love me, and I know it so well that I was reproaching
+ myself severely not long ago, for seeming to love your love more than
+ you. Let me tell you how I proved <i>that</i>, or seemed. For ever so long,
+ you remember, I have been talking finely about giving you up for your
+ good and so on. Which was sincere as far as the words went&mdash;but oh,
+ the hypocrisy of our souls!&mdash;of mine, for instance! 'I would give you
+ up for your good'&mdash;<i>but</i> when I pressed upon myself the question
+ whether (if I had the power) I would consent to make you willing to be
+ given up, by throwing away your love into the river, in a ring like
+ Charlemagne's, ... why I found directly that I would throw myself
+ there sooner. I could not do it in fact&mdash;I shrank from the test. A
+ very pitiful virtue of generosity, is your Ba's! Still, it is not
+ possible, I think, that she should '<i>love your love more than you</i>.'
+ There must be a mistake in the calculation somewhere&mdash;a figure dropt.
+ It would be too bad for her!
+</p>
+<p>
+ Your account of your merchantmen, though with Venice in the distance,
+ will scarcely be attractive to a confirmed invalid, I fear&mdash;and yet
+ the steamers will be found expensive beyond his means. The
+ sugar-vessels, which I hear most about, give out an insufferable smell
+ and steam&mdash;let us talk of it a little on Thursday. On Monday I forgot.
+</p>
+<p>
+ For Landor's 'Julian,' oh no, I cannot fancy it to be probable that
+ those Parisians should know anything of Landor, even by a mistake. Do
+ you not suppose that the play is founded (confounded) on Shelley's
+ poem, as the French use materials ... by distraction, into confusion?
+ The 'urn by the Adriatic' (which all the French know how to turn
+ upside down) fixes the reference to Shelley&mdash;does it not?
+</p>
+<p>
+ Not a word of the head&mdash;what does <i>that</i> mean, I wonder. I have not
+ been down-stairs to-day&mdash;the wind is too cold&mdash;but you have walked?
+ ... there was no excuse for you. God bless you, ever dearest. It is my
+ last word till Thursday's first. A fine queen you have, by the way!&mdash;a
+ queen Log, whom you had better leave in the bushes! Witness our
+ hand....
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right"><SPAN class="sc-ex">Ba&mdash;Regina</span>.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>R.B. to E.B.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">[Post-mark, March 18, 1846.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ Indeed, dearest, you shall not have <i>last word</i> as you think,&mdash;all the
+ 'risk' shall not be mine, neither; how can I, in the event, throw
+ ambs-ace (is not that the old word?) and not peril <i>your</i> stakes too,
+ when once we have common stock and are partners? When I see the
+ unicorn and grieve proportionately, do you mean to say you are not
+ going to grieve too, for my sake? And if so&mdash;why, <i>you</i> clearly run
+ exactly the same risk,&mdash;<i>must</i>,&mdash;unless you mean to rejoice in my
+ sorrow! So your chance is my chance; my success your success, you say,
+ and my failure, your failure, will you not say? You see, you see, Ba,
+ my own&mdash;own! What do you think frightened me in your letter for a
+ second or two? You write 'Let us talk on Thursday ... Monday I
+ forgot'&mdash;which I read,&mdash;'no, not on Thursday&mdash;I had forgotten! It is
+ to be <i>Monday</i> when we meet next'!&mdash;whereat
+</p>
+<blockquote><blockquote><blockquote><blockquote><blockquote><blockquote><p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; ... as a goose<br>
+In death contracts his talons close,
+</p>
+</blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><p style="text-indent: 0em">as Hudibras sings&mdash;I clutched the letter convulsively&mdash;till relief
+ came.
+</p>
+<p>
+ So till to-morrow&mdash;my all-beloved! Bless you. I am rather hazy in the
+ head as Archer Gurney will find in due season&mdash;(he comes, I told
+ you)&mdash;but all the morning I have been going for once and for ever
+ through the 'Tragedy,' and it is <i>done</i>&mdash;(done <i>for</i>). Perhaps I may
+ bring it to-morrow&mdash;if my sister can copy all; I cut out a huge kind
+ of sermon from the middle and reserve it for a better time&mdash;still it
+ is very long; so long! So, if I ask, may I have 'Luria' back to
+ morrow? So shall printing begin, and headache end&mdash;and 'no more for
+ the present from your loving'
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">R.B.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>E.B.B. to R.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Friday.<br>
+[Post-mark, March 20, 1846.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ I shall be late with my letter this morning because my sisters have
+ been here talking, talking ... and I did not like to say exactly 'Go
+ away that I may write.' Mr. Kenyon shortened our time yesterday too by
+ a whole half-hour or three quarters&mdash;the stars are against us. He is
+ coming on Sunday, however, he says, and if so, Monday will be safe and
+ clear&mdash;and not a word was said after you went, about you: he was in a
+ good joyous humour, as you saw, and the letter he brought was, oh! so
+ complimentary to me&mdash;I will tell you. The writer doesn't see anything
+ 'in Browning and Turner,' she confesses&mdash;'<i>may</i> perhaps with time and
+ study,' but for the present sees nothing,&mdash;only has wide-open eyes of
+ admiration for E.B.B. ... now isn't it satisfactory to <i>me</i>? Do you
+ understand the full satisfaction of just that sort of thing ... to be
+ praised by somebody who sees nothing in Shakespeare?&mdash;to be found on
+ the level of somebody so flat? Better the bad-word of the Britannia,
+ ten times over! And best, to take no thought of bad or good words! ...
+ except such as I shall have to-night, perhaps! Shall I?
+</p>
+<p>
+ Will you be pleased to understand in the meanwhile a little about the
+ 'risks' I am supposed to run, and not hold to such a godlike
+ simplicity ('gods and bulls,' dearest!) as you made show of yesterday?
+ If we two went to the gaming-table, and you gave me a purse of gold to
+ play with, should I have a right to talk proudly of 'my stakes?' and
+ would any reasonable person say of both of us playing together as
+ partners, that we ran 'equal risks'? I trow not&mdash;and so do <i>you</i> ...
+ when you have not predetermined to be stupid, and mix up the rouge and
+ noir into 'one red' of glorious confusion. What had I to lose on the
+ point of happiness when you knew me first?&mdash;and if now I lose (as I
+ certainly may according to your calculation) the happiness you have
+ given me, why still I am your debtor for <i>the gift</i> ... now see! Yet
+ to bring you down into my ashes ... <i>that</i> has been so intolerable a
+ possibility to me from the first. Well, perhaps I run <i>more</i> risk than
+ you, under that one aspect. Certainly I never should forgive myself
+ again if you were unhappy. 'What had <i>I</i> to do,' I should think, 'with
+ touching your life?' And if ever I am to think so, I would rather that
+ I never had known you, seen your face, heard your voice&mdash;which is the
+ uttermost sacrifice and abnegation. I could not say or sacrifice any
+ more&mdash;not even for <i>you</i>! <i>You</i>, for <i>you</i> ... is all I can!
+</p>
+<p>
+ Since you left me I have been making up my mind to your having the
+ headache worse than ever, through the agreement with Moxon. I do, do
+ beseech you to spare yourself, and let 'Luria' go as he is, and above
+ all things not to care for my infinite foolishnesses as you see them
+ in those notes. Remember that if you are ill, it is not so easy to
+ say, 'Now I will be well again.' Ever dearest, care for me in
+ yourself&mdash;say how you are.... I am not unwell to-day, but feel flagged
+ and weak rather with the cold ... and look at your flowers for courage
+ and an assurance that the summer is within hearing. May God bless you
+ ... blessing <i>us</i>, beloved!
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">Your own</p>
+<p style="text-align: right"><SPAN class="sc-ex">Ba</span>.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Mr. Poe has sent me his poems and tales&mdash;so now I must write to thank
+ him for his dedication. Just now I have the book. As to Mr.
+ Buckingham, he will go, Constantinople and back, before we talk of
+ him.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>R.B. to E.B.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Saturday Morning.<br>
+[Post-mark, March 21, 1846.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ Dearest,&mdash;it just strikes me that I <i>might</i> by some chance be kept in
+ town this morning&mdash;(having to go to Milnes' breakfast there)&mdash;so as
+ not to find the note I venture to expect, in time for an answer by our
+ last post to-night. But I will try&mdash;this only is a precaution against
+ the possibility. Dear, dear Ba! I cannot thank you, know not how to
+ thank you for the notes! I adopt every one, of course, not as Ba's
+ notes but as Miss Barrett's, not as Miss Barrett's but as anybody's,
+ everybody's&mdash;such incontestable improvements they suggest. When shall
+ I tell you more ... on Monday or Tuesday? <i>That</i> I <i>must</i>
+ know&mdash;because you appointed Monday, 'if nothing happened&mdash;' and Mr. K.
+ happened&mdash;can you let me hear by our early post to-morrow&mdash;as on
+ Monday I am to be with Moxon early, you know&mdash;and no letters arrive
+ before 11-1/2 or 12. I was not very well yesterday, but to-day am much
+ better&mdash;and you,&mdash;I say how <i>I</i> am precisely to have a double right to
+ know <i>all</i> about you, dearest, in this snow and cold! How do you bear
+ it? And Mr. K. spoke of '<i>that</i> being your worst day.' Oh, dear
+ dearest Ba, remember how I live in you&mdash;on the hopes, with the memory
+ of you. Bless you ever!
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">R.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>E.B.B. to R.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">[Post-mark, March 21, 1846.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ I do not understand how my letters limp so instead of flying as they
+ ought with the feathers I give them, and how you did not receive last
+ night, nor even early this morning, what left me at two o'clock
+ yesterday. But I understand <i>now</i> the not hearing from you&mdash;you were
+ not well. Not well, not well ... <i>that</i> is always 'happening' at
+ least. And Mr. Moxon, who is to have his first sheet, whether you are
+ well or ill! It is wrong ... yes, very wrong&mdash;and if one point of
+ wrongness is touched, we shall not easily get right again&mdash;as I think
+ mournfully, feeling confident (call me Cassandra, but I cannot jest
+ about it) feeling certain that it will end (the means being so
+ persisted in) by some serious illness&mdash;serious sorrow,&mdash;on yours and
+ my part.
+</p>
+<p>
+ As to Monday, Mr. Kenyon said he would come again on Sunday&mdash;in which
+ case, Monday will be clear. If he should not come on Sunday, he will
+ or may on Monday,&mdash;yet&mdash;oh, in every case, perhaps you can come on
+ Monday&mdash;there will be no time to let you know of Mr. Kenyon&mdash;and
+ <i>probably</i> we shall be safe, and your being in town seems to fix the
+ day. For myself I am well enough, and the wind has changed, which will
+ make me better&mdash;this cold weather oppresses and weakens me, but it is
+ close to April and can't last and won't last&mdash;it is warmer already.
+ Beware of the notes! They are not Ba's&mdash;except for the insolence, nor
+ EBB's&mdash;because of the carelessness. If I had known, moreover, that you
+ were going to Moxon's on Monday, they should have gone to the fire
+ rather than provoked you into superfluous work for the short interval.
+ Just so much are they despised of both EBB and Ba.
+</p>
+<p>
+ I am glad I did not hear from you yesterday because you were not
+ well, and you <i>must never</i> write when you are not well. But if you had
+ been quite well, should I have heard?&mdash;<i>I doubt it</i>. You meant me to
+ hear from you only once, from Thursday to Monday. Is it not the truth
+ now that you hate writing to me?
+</p>
+<p>
+ The <i>Athenæum</i> takes up the 'Tales from Boccaccio' as if they were
+ worth it, and imputes in an underground way the authorship to the
+ members of the 'coterie' so called&mdash;do you observe <i>that</i>? There is an
+ implication that persons named in the poem wrote the poem themselves.
+ And upon <i>whom</i> does the critic mean to fix the song of 'Constancy'
+ ... the song which is 'not to puzzle anybody' who knows the tunes of
+ the song-writers! The perfection of commonplace it seems to me. It
+ might have been written by the 'poet Bunn.' Don't you think so?
+</p>
+<p>
+ While I write this you are in town, but you will not read it till
+ Sunday unless I am more fortunate than usual. On Monday then! And no
+ word before? No&mdash;I shall be sure not to hear to-night. Now do try not
+ to suffer through 'Luria.' Let Mr. Moxon wait a week rather. There is
+ time enough.
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">Ever your</p>
+<p style="text-align: right"><SPAN class="sc-ex">Ba</span>.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>R.B. to E.B.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Sunday.<br>
+[Post-mark, March 23, 1846.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ Oh, my Ba&mdash;how you shall hear of this to-morrow&mdash;that is all: <i>I</i> hate
+ writing? See when presently I <i>only</i> write to you daily, hourly if you
+ let me? Just this <i>now</i>&mdash;I will be with you to-morrow in any case&mdash;I
+ can go away <i>at once</i>, if need be, or stay&mdash;if you like you can stop
+ me by sending a note for me <i>to Moxon's before</i> 10 o'clock&mdash;if
+ anything calls for such a measure.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Now briefly,&mdash;I am unwell and entirely irritated with this sad
+ 'Luria'&mdash;I thought it a failure at first, I find it infinitely worse
+ than I thought&mdash;it is a pure exercise of <i>cleverness</i>, even where most
+ successful; clever attempted reproduction of what was conceived by
+ another faculty, and foolishly let pass away. If I go on, even hurry
+ the more to get on, with the printing,&mdash;it is to throw out and away
+ from me the irritating obstruction once and forever. I have corrected
+ it, cut it down, and it may stand and pledge me to doing better
+ hereafter. I say, too, in excuse to myself, <i>unlike</i> the woman at her
+ spinning-wheel, 'He thought of his <i>flax</i> on the whole far more than
+ of his singing'&mdash;more of his life's sustainment, of dear, dear Ba he
+ hates writing to, than of these wooden figures&mdash;no wonder all is as it
+ is?
+</p>
+<p>
+ Here is a pure piece of the old Chorley leaven for you, just as it
+ reappears ever and anon and throws one back on the mistrust all but
+ abandoned! Chorley <i>knows</i> I have not seen that Powell for nearly
+ fifteen months&mdash;that I never heard of the book till it reached me in a
+ blank cover&mdash;that I never contributed a line or word to it directly or
+ indirectly&mdash;and I should think he <i>also knows</i> that all the sham
+ learning, notes &amp;c., all that saves the book from the deepest deep of
+ contempt, was contributed by Heraud (<i>a regular critic in the
+ 'Athenæum'</i>), who received his pay for the same: he knows I never
+ spoke in my life to 'Jones or Stephens'&mdash;that there is no 'coterie' of
+ which I can, by any extension of the word, form a part&mdash;that I am in
+ this case at the mercy of a wretched creature who to get into my
+ favour again (to speak the plain truth) put in the gross, disgusting
+ flattery in the notes&mdash;yet Chorley, knowing this, none so well, and
+ what the writer's end is&mdash;(to have it supposed I, and the others
+ named&mdash;Talfourd, for instance&mdash;<SPAN class="sc-ex">are</span> his friends and helpers)&mdash;he
+ condescends to <i>further</i> it by such a notice, written with that
+ observable and characteristic duplicity, that to poor gross stupid
+ Powell it shall look like an admiring 'Oh, fie&mdash;<i>so</i> clever but <i>so</i>
+ wicked'!&mdash;a kind of <i>D'Orsay's</i> praise&mdash;while to the rest of his
+ readers, a few depreciatory epithets&mdash;slight sneers convey his real
+ sentiments, he trusts! And this he does, just because Powell buys an
+ article of him once a quarter and would <i>expect</i> notice. I think I
+ hear Chorley&mdash;'You know, I <i>cannot</i> praise such a book&mdash;it <i>is</i> too
+ bad'&mdash;as if, as if&mdash;oh, it makes one sicker than having written
+ 'Luria,' there's one comfort! I shall call on Chorley and ask for
+ <i>his</i> account of the matter. Meantime nobody will read his foolish
+ notice without believing as he and Powell desire! Bless you, my own
+ Ba&mdash;to-morrow makes amends to R.B.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>E.B.B. to R.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Tuesday.<br>
+[Post-mark, March 24, 1846.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ How ungrateful I was to your flowers yesterday, never looking at them
+ nor praising them till they were put away, and yourself gone away&mdash;and
+ <i>that</i> was <i>your</i> fault, be it remembered, because you began to tell
+ me of the good news from Moxon's, and, in the joy of it, I missed the
+ flowers ... for the nonce, you know. Afterward they had their due, and
+ all the more that you were not there. My first business when you are
+ out of the room and the house, and the street perhaps, is to arrange
+ the flowers and to gather out of them all the thoughts you leave
+ between the leaves and at the end of the stalks. And shall I tell you
+ what happened, not yesterday, but the Thursday before? no, it was the
+ Friday morning, when I found, or rather Wilson found and held up from
+ my chair, a bunch of dead blue violets. Quite dead they seemed! You
+ had dropped them and I had sate on them, and where we murdered them
+ they had lain, poor things, all the night through. And Wilson thought
+ it the vainest of labours when she saw me set about reviving them,
+ cutting the stalks afresh, and dipping them head and ears into
+ water&mdash;but then she did not know how you, and I, and ours, live under
+ a miraculous dispensation, and could only simply be astonished when
+ they took to blowing again as if they never had wanted the dew of the
+ garden, ... yes, and when at last they outlived all the prosperity of
+ the contemporary white violets which flourished in water from the
+ beginning, and were free from the disadvantage of having been sate
+ upon. Now you shall thank me for this letter, it is at once so amusing
+ and instructive. After all, too, it teaches you what the great events
+ of my life are, not that the resuscitation of your violets would not
+ really be a great event to me, even if I led the life of a pirate,
+ between fire and sea, otherwise. But take <i>you</i> away ... out of my
+ life!&mdash;and what remains? The only greenness I used to have (before you
+ brought your flowers) was as the grass growing in deserted streets,
+ ... which brings a proof, in every increase, of the extending
+ desolation.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Dearest, I persist in thinking that you ought not to be too disdainful
+ to explain your meaning in the Pomegranates. Surely you might say in a
+ word or two that, your title having been doubted about (to your
+ surprise, you <i>might</i> say!), you refer the doubters to the Jewish
+ priest's robe, and the Rabbinical gloss ... for I suppose it is a
+ gloss on the robe ... do you not think so? Consider that Mr. Kenyon
+ and I may fairly represent the average intelligence of your
+ readers,&mdash;and that <i>he</i> was altogether in the clouds as to your
+ meaning ... had not the most distant notion of it,&mdash;while I, taking
+ hold of the priest's garment, missed the Rabbins and the distinctive
+ significance, as completely as he did. Then for Vasari, it is not the
+ handbook of the whole world, however it may be Mrs. Jameson's. Now why
+ should you be too proud to teach such persons as only desire to be
+ taught? I persist&mdash;I shall teaze you.
+</p>
+<p>
+ This morning my brothers have been saying ... 'Ah you had Mr. Browning
+ with you yesterday, I see by the flowers,' ... just as if they said 'I
+ see queen Mab has been with you.' Then Stormie took the opportunity of
+ swearing to me by all his gods that your name was mentioned lately in
+ the House of Commons&mdash;<i>is</i> that true? or untrue? He forgot to tell me
+ at the time, he says,&mdash;and you were named with others and in relation
+ to copyright matters. <i>Is</i> it true?
+</p>
+<p>
+ Mr. Hornblower Gill is the author of a Hymn to Passion week, and wrote
+ to me as the 'glorifier of pain!' to remind me that the best glory of
+ a soul is shown in the joy of it, and that all chief poets except
+ Dante have seen, felt, and written it so. Thus and therefore was
+ matured his purpose of writing an 'ode to joy,' as I told you. The man
+ seems to have very good thoughts, ... but he writes like a colder
+ Cowley still ... no impulse, no heat for fusing ... no inspiration, in
+ fact. Though I have scarcely done more than glance at his 'Passion
+ week,' and have little right to give an opinion.
+</p>
+<p>
+ If you have killed Luria as you helped to kill my violets, what shall
+ I say, do you fancy? Well&mdash;we shall see! Do not kill yourself,
+ beloved, in any case! The <span title="iostephanoi Mousai">&iota;&omicron;&sigma;&tau;&epsilon;&phi;&alpha;&nu;&omicron;&iota;
+
+&Mu;&omicron;&upsilon;&sigma;&alpha;&iota;</span> had better die
+ themselves first! Ah&mdash;what am I writing? What nonsense? I mean, in
+ deep earnest, the deepest, that you should take care and exercise, and
+ not be vexed for Luria's sake&mdash;Luria will have his triumph presently!
+ May God bless you&mdash;prays your own
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right"><SPAN class="sc-ex">Ba</span>.
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>R.B. to E.B.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Tuesday Afternoon.<br>
+[Post-mark, March 24, 1846.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ My own dearest, if you <i>do</i>&mdash;(for I confess to nothing of the kind),
+ but if you <i>should</i> detect an unwillingness to write at certain times,
+ what would that prove,&mdash;I mean, what that one need shrink from
+ avowing? If I never had you before me except when writing letters to
+ you&mdash;then! Why, we do not even <i>talk</i> much now! witness Mr. Buckingham
+ and his voyage that ought to have been discussed!&mdash;Oh, how coldly I
+ should write,&mdash;how the bleak-looking paper would seem unpropitious to
+ carry my feeling&mdash;if all had to begin and try to find words <i>this</i>
+ way!
+</p>
+<p>
+ Now, this morning I have been out&mdash;to town and back&mdash;and for all the
+ walking my head aches&mdash;and I have the conviction that presently when I
+ resign myself to think of you wholly, with only the pretext,&mdash;the
+ make-believe of occupation, in the shape of some book to turn over the
+ leaves of,&mdash;I shall see you and soon be well; so soon! You must know,
+ there is a chair (one of the kind called gond<i>ó</i>la-chairs by
+ upholsterers&mdash;with an emphasized o)&mdash;which occupies the precise place,
+ stands just in the same relation to this chair I sit on now, that
+ yours stands in and occupies&mdash;to the left of the fire: and, how often,
+ how <i>always</i> I turn in the dusk and <i>see</i> the dearest real Ba with me.
+</p>
+<p>
+ How entirely kind to take that trouble, give those sittings for me! Do
+ you think the kindness has missed its due effect? <i>No, no</i>, I am
+ glad,&mdash;(<i>knowing what I</i> now <i>know</i>,&mdash;what you meant <i>should be</i>, and
+ did all in your power to prevent) that I have <i>not</i> received the
+ picture, if anything short of an adequate likeness. 'Nil nisi&mdash;te!'
+ But I have set my heart on <i>seeing</i> it&mdash;will you remember next time,
+ next Saturday?
+</p>
+<p>
+ I will leave off now. To-morrow, dearest, only dearest Ba, I will
+ write a longer letter&mdash;the clock stops it this afternoon&mdash;it is later
+ than I thought, and our poor crazy post! This morning, hoping against
+ hope, I ran to meet our postman coming meditatively up the lane&mdash;with
+ <i>a</i> letter, indeed!&mdash;but Ba's will come to-night&mdash;and I will be happy,
+ already <i>am</i> happy, expecting it. Bless you, my own love,
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right">Ever your&mdash;
+</p>
+<br>
+<h3><i>E.B.B. to R.B.</i> </h3>
+<p style="text-align: right">Tuesday Evening.<br>
+[Post-mark, March 25, 1846.]
+</p>
+<p>
+ Ah; if I '<i>do</i>' ... if I '<i>should</i>' ... if I <i>shall</i> ... if I <i>will</i>
+ ... if I <i>must</i> ... what can all the 'ifs' prove, but a most
+ hypothetical state of the conscience? And in brief, I beg you to
+ stand convinced of one thing, that whenever the 'certain time' comes
+ for to 'hate writing to me' confessedly, 'avowedly,' (oh what words!)
+ <i>I shall not like it at all</i>&mdash;not for all the explanations ... and the
+ sights in gondola chairs, which the person seen is none the better
+ for! The <span title="eidôlon">&epsilon;&iota;&delta;&omega;&lambda;&omicron;&nu;</span> sits by the fire&mdash;the real Ba is cold at
+ heart through wanting her letter. And that's the doctrine to be
+ preached now, ... is it? I 'shrink,' shrink from it. That's your
+ word!&mdash;and mine! Dearest, I began by half a jest and end by
+ half-gravity, which is the fault of your doctrine and not of me I
+ think. Yet it is ungrateful to be grave, when practically you are good
+ and just about the letters, and generous too sometimes, and I could
+ not bear the idea of obliging you to write to me, even once ...
+ when.... Now do not fancy that I do not understand. I understand
+ perfectly, on the contrary. Only do <i>you</i> try not to dislike writing
+ when you write, or not to write when you dislike it ... <i>that</i>, I ask
+ of you, dear dearest&mdash;and forgive me for all this over-writing and
+ teazing and vexing which is foolish and womanish in the bad sense. It
+ is a way of meeting, ... the meeting in letters, ... and next to
+ receiving a letter from you, I like to write one to you ... and, so,
+ revolt from thinking it lawful for you to dislike.... Well! the
+ Goddess of Dulness herself couldn't have written <i>this</i> better,
+ anyway, nor more characteristically.
+</p>
+<p>
+ I will tell you how it is. You have spoilt me just as I have spoilt
+ Flush. Flush looks at me sometimes with reproachful eyes 'a fendre le
+ coeur,' because I refuse to give him my fur cuffs to tear to pieces.
+ And as for myself, I confess to being more than half jealous of the
+ <span title="eidôlon">&epsilon;&iota;&delta;&omega;&lambda;&omicron;&nu;</span> in the gondola chair, who isn't the real Ba after
+ all, and yet is set up there to do away with the necessity 'at certain
+ times' of writing to her. Which is worse than Flush. For Flush, though
+ he began by shivering with rage and barking and howling and gnashing
+ his teeth at the brown dog in the glass, has learnt by experience what
+ that image means, ... and now contemplates it, serene in natural
+ philosophy. Most excellent sense, all this is!&mdash;and dauntlessly
+ 'delivered!'
+</p>
+<p>
+ Your head aches, dearest. Mr. Moxon will have done his worst, however,
+ presently, and then you will be a little better I do hope and
+ trust&mdash;and the proofs, in the meanwhile, will do somewhat less harm
+ than the manuscript. You will take heart again about 'Luria' ... which
+ I agree with you, is more diffuse ... that is, less close, than any of
+ your works, not diffuse in any bad sense, but round, copious, and
+ another proof of that wonderful variety of faculty which is so
+ striking in you, and which signalizes itself both in the thought and
+ in the medium of the thought. You will appreciate 'Luria' in time&mdash;or
+ others will do it for you. It is a noble work under every aspect. Dear
+ 'Luria'! Do you remember how you told me of 'Luria' last year, in one
+ of your early letters? Little I thought that ever, ever, I should feel
+ so, while 'Luria' went to be printed! A long trail of thoughts, like
+ the rack in the sky, follows his going. Can it be the same 'Luria,' I
+ think, that 'golden-hearted Luria,' whom you talked of to me, when you
+ complained of keeping 'wild company,' in the old dear letter? And I
+ have learnt since, that '<i>golden-hearted</i>' is not a word for him only,
+ or for him most. May God bless you, best and dearest! I am your own to
+ live and to die&mdash;
+</p>
+<p style="text-align: right"><SPAN class="sc-ex">Ba</span>.
+</p>
+<p>
+ <i>Say how you are.</i> I shall be down-stairs to-morrow if it keeps warm.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Miss Thomson wants me to translate the Hector and Andromache scene
+ from the 'Iliad' for her book; and I am going to try it.
+</p>
+<br>
+<hr>
+<br>
+<center>
+ <b>END OF THE FIRST VOLUME </b></center>
+<p style="text-align: center"><i>Spottiswoode &amp; Co. Printers, New-street Square, London</i>
+</p>
+
+<br>
+<hr>
+<br>
+
+<h3>
+ FOOTNOTES
+</h3>
+<a name="note-1"><!--Note--></a>
+<p><b><u>1</u></b> With this and the following letter the addresses on the
+ envelopes are given; for all subsequent letters the addresses are the
+ same. The correspondence passed through the post.
+</p>
+<a name="note-2"><!--Note--></a>
+<p>
+<b><u>2</u></b> 'Not yet reached the prelude' (Aesch. <i>Prom.</i> 741).
+</p>
+<a name="note-3"><!--Note--></a>
+<p>
+<b><u>3</u></b> The following is the version of the passage in Mrs.
+ Browning's later translation of the 'Prometheus' (II. 247-251 of the
+ original):
+</p>
+<p><i>Prom.</i>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; I did restrain besides<br>
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
+My mortals from premeditating death.</p>
+<p>
+ <i>Cho.</i>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; How didst thou medicine the plague-fear of death?
+</p>
+<p>
+ <i>Prom.</i>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; I set blind hopes to inhabit in their house.
+</p>
+<p>
+ <i>Cho.</i>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; By that gift thou didst help thy mortals well.</p>
+<a name="note-4"><!--Note--></a>
+<p>
+<b><u>4</u></b> Aeschylus, <i>Prometheus</i>, 228ff.:
+</p>
+<blockquote><blockquote><p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; When at first<br>
+He filled his father's throne, he instantly<br>
+Made various gifts of glory to the gods.'
+</p>
+</blockquote></blockquote>
+<a name="note-5"><!--Note--></a>
+<p>
+<b><u>5</u></b> <i>Ib.</i> 439, 440:
+</p>
+<blockquote><blockquote><p style="text-indent: 0em">'For see&mdash;their honours to these new-made gods,<br>
+What other gave but I?'
+</p>
+</blockquote></blockquote>
+<a name="note-6"><!--Note--></a>
+<p>
+<b><u>6</u></b> <i>Ib.</i> 231, 232:
+</p>
+<blockquote><blockquote><p> &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 'Alone of men,<br>
+Of miserable men, he took no count.'</p>
+</blockquote></blockquote>
+<a name="note-7"><!--Note--></a>
+<p>
+<b><u>7</u></b> <i>Ib.</i> 235: 'But I dared it.'
+</p>
+<a name="note-8"><!--Note--></a>
+<p>
+<b><u>8</u></b> <i>Ib.</i> 11: 'Leave off his old trick of loving man.'
+</p>
+<a name="note-9"><!--Note--></a>
+<p>
+<b><u>9</u></b> <i>Ib.</i> 443, 444:
+</p>
+<blockquote><blockquote><p> &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 'Being fools before,<br>
+I made them wise and true in aim of soul.'
+</p>
+</blockquote></blockquote><a name="note-10"><!--Note--></a>
+<p>
+<b><u>10</u></b> <i>Ib.</i> 250: 'Blind hopes.'
+</p>
+<a name="note-11"><!--Note--></a>
+<p>
+<b><u>11</u></b> <i>Ib.</i> 251: 'A great benefit.'
+</p>
+<a name="note-12"><!--Note--></a>
+<p>
+<b><u>12</u></b> <i>Ib.</i> 92: 'Behold what I suffer.'
+</p>
+<a name="note-13"><!--Note--></a>
+<p>
+<b><u>13</u></b> <i>Ib.</i> 1093: 'Dost see how I suffer this wrong?'
+</p>
+<a name="note-14"><!--Note--></a>
+<p>
+<b><u>14</u></b> A rough sketch follows in the original.
+</p>
+<a name="note-15"><!--Note--></a>
+<p>
+<b><u>15</u></b> Aeschylus, <i>Agamemnon</i> 36: 'An ox hath trodden on my
+ tongue'&mdash;a Greek proverb implying silence.
+</p>
+<a name="note-16"><!--Note--></a>
+<p>
+<b><u>16</u></b> Envelope endorsed by Robert Browning:&mdash;Tuesday, May 20,
+ 1845, 3-4-1/2 p.m.
+</p>
+<a name="note-17"><!--Note--></a>
+<p>
+<b><u>17</u></b> 'What have I to do with thee?'
+</p>
+<a name="note-18"><!--Note--></a>
+<p>
+<b><u>18</u></b> ... me on Tuesday, or Wednesday? if on Tuesday, I shall
+ come by the three o'clock train; if on Wednesday, <i>early</i> in the
+ morning, as I shall be anxious to secure rooms ... so that your Uncle
+ and Arabel may come up on Thursday.
+</p>
+<a name="note-19"><!--Note--></a>
+<p>
+<b><u>19</u></b> Aeschylus, <i>Prometheus</i> II.: 'trick of loving men,' see
+ <a href="#note-8">note 3</a>, on <a href="#39">p. 39</a> above. [Transcriber's
+ note: note 3 has been renumbered note 8 in this e-book.]
+</p>
+<a name="note-20"><!--Note--></a>
+<p>
+<b><u>20</u></b> 'R. Benjamin of Tudela' added in Robert Browning's
+ handwriting.
+</p>
+<a name="note-21"><!--Note--></a>
+<p>
+<b><u>21</u></b> Mr. Browning's letter is written in an unusually bold
+ hand.
+</p>
+<a name="note-22"><!--Note--></a>
+<p>
+<b><u>22</u></b> Envelope endorsed by E.B.B. 'hair.'
+</p>
+<a name="note-23"><!--Note--></a>
+<p>
+<b><u>23</u></b> 'Purg.' v. 52 7.
+</p>
+<a name="note-24"><!--Note--></a>
+<p>
+<b><u>24</u></b> The cutting enclosed is:&mdash;'A Few Rhymes for the Present
+ Christmas' by J. Purchas, Esq., B.A. It is headed by several
+ quotations, the first of which is signed 'Elizabeth B. Barrett:'
+</p>
+<blockquote><p style="text-indent: 0em">'This age shows to my thinking, still more infidels to Adam,<br>
+Than directly, by profession, simple infidels to God.'
+</p>
+</blockquote><p>
+ This is followed by extracts from Pindar, 'Lear,' and the Hon. Mrs.
+ Norton.
+</p>
+<a name="note-25"><!--Note--></a>
+<p>
+<b><u>25</u></b> Sprig of Hawthorn enclosed with letter.
+</p>
+<a name="note-26"><!--Note--></a>
+<p>
+<b><u>26</u></b> The words in brackets are struck out.
+</p>
+<br>
+<br>
+<br>
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+<pre>
+
+
+
+
+
+End of the Project Gutenberg EBook of The Letters of Robert Browning and
+Elizabeth Barrett Barrett, Vol. 1 (of 2) 1845-1846, Edited by Robert Browning
+
+*** END OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK LETTERS OF BROWNING ***
+
+***** This file should be named 16182-h.htm or 16182-h.zip *****
+This and all associated files of various formats will be found in:
+ https://www.gutenberg.org/1/6/1/8/16182/
+
+Produced by Jonathan Ingram, Linda Cantoni, and the Online
+Distributed Proofreading Team at https://www.pgdp.net
+
+
+Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions
+will be renamed.
+
+Creating the works from public domain print editions means that no
+one owns a United States copyright in these works, so the Foundation
+(and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United States without
+permission and without paying copyright royalties. Special rules,
+set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license, apply to
+copying and distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works to
+protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm concept and trademark. Project
+Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if you
+charge for the eBooks, unless you receive specific permission. If you
+do not charge anything for copies of this eBook, complying with the
+rules is very easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose
+such as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and
+research. They may be modified and printed and given away--you may do
+practically ANYTHING with public domain eBooks. Redistribution is
+subject to the trademark license, especially commercial
+redistribution.
+
+
+
+*** START: FULL LICENSE ***
+
+THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE
+PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK
+
+To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free
+distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work
+(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project
+Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full Project
+Gutenberg-tm License (available with this file or online at
+https://gutenberg.org/license).
+
+
+Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic works
+
+1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to
+and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property
+(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all
+the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or destroy
+all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your possession.
+If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the
+terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or
+entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8.
+
+1.B. "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark. It may only be
+used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who
+agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few
+things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works
+even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See
+paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement
+and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
+works. See paragraph 1.E below.
+
+1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the Foundation"
+or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection of Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic works. Nearly all the individual works in the
+collection are in the public domain in the United States. If an
+individual work is in the public domain in the United States and you are
+located in the United States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from
+copying, distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative
+works based on the work as long as all references to Project Gutenberg
+are removed. Of course, we hope that you will support the Project
+Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting free access to electronic works by
+freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm works in compliance with the terms of
+this agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with
+the work. You can easily comply with the terms of this agreement by
+keeping this work in the same format with its attached full Project
+Gutenberg-tm License when you share it without charge with others.
+
+1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern
+what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are in
+a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States, check
+the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this agreement
+before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, distributing or
+creating derivative works based on this work or any other Project
+Gutenberg-tm work. The Foundation makes no representations concerning
+the copyright status of any work in any country outside the United
+States.
+
+1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg:
+
+1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate
+access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear prominently
+whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work on which the
+phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the phrase "Project
+Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed, viewed,
+copied or distributed:
+
+This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with
+almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or
+re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included
+with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org
+
+1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is derived
+from the public domain (does not contain a notice indicating that it is
+posted with permission of the copyright holder), the work can be copied
+and distributed to anyone in the United States without paying any fees
+or charges. If you are redistributing or providing access to a work
+with the phrase "Project Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the
+work, you must comply either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1
+through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the
+Project Gutenberg-tm trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or
+1.E.9.
+
+1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted
+with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution
+must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any additional
+terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms will be linked
+to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works posted with the
+permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of this work.
+
+1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this
+work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm.
+
+1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this
+electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without
+prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with
+active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project
+Gutenberg-tm License.
+
+1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary,
+compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including any
+word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access to or
+distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format other than
+"Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official version
+posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm web site (www.gutenberg.org),
+you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a
+copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon
+request, of the work in its original "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other
+form. Any alternate format must include the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1.
+
+1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying,
+performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works
+unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.
+
+1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing
+access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works provided
+that
+
+- You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from
+ the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method
+ you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is
+ owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he
+ has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the
+ Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments
+ must be paid within 60 days following each date on which you
+ prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your periodic tax
+ returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked as such and
+ sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the
+ address specified in Section 4, "Information about donations to
+ the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation."
+
+- You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies
+ you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he
+ does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+ License. You must require such a user to return or
+ destroy all copies of the works possessed in a physical medium
+ and discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of
+ Project Gutenberg-tm works.
+
+- You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any
+ money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the
+ electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days
+ of receipt of the work.
+
+- You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
+ distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works.
+
+1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set
+forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from
+both the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and Michael
+Hart, the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark. Contact the
+Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below.
+
+1.F.
+
+1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable
+effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread
+public domain works in creating the Project Gutenberg-tm
+collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
+works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may contain
+"Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or
+corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual
+property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other medium, a
+computer virus, or computer codes that damage or cannot be read by
+your equipment.
+
+1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right
+of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project
+Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project
+Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all
+liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal
+fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT
+LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE
+PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH F3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE
+TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE
+LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR
+INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH
+DAMAGE.
+
+1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a
+defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can
+receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a
+written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you
+received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium with
+your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you with
+the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu of a
+refund. If you received the work electronically, the person or entity
+providing it to you may choose to give you a second opportunity to
+receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If the second copy
+is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing without further
+opportunities to fix the problem.
+
+1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth
+in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS' WITH NO OTHER
+WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO
+WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTIBILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.
+
+1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied
+warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages.
+If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the
+law of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be
+interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by
+the applicable state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any
+provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions.
+
+1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the
+trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone
+providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in accordance
+with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the production,
+promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works,
+harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees,
+that arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do
+or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg-tm
+work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or deletions to any
+Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any Defect you cause.
+
+
+Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of
+electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of computers
+including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It exists
+because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations from
+people in all walks of life.
+
+Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the
+assistance they need, is critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's
+goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will
+remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project
+Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure
+and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future generations.
+To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation
+and how your efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4
+and the Foundation web page at https://www.pglaf.org.
+
+
+Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
+Foundation
+
+The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non profit
+501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the
+state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal
+Revenue Service. The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification
+number is 64-6221541. Its 501(c)(3) letter is posted at
+https://pglaf.org/fundraising. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg
+Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent
+permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state's laws.
+
+The Foundation's principal office is located at 4557 Melan Dr. S.
+Fairbanks, AK, 99712., but its volunteers and employees are scattered
+throughout numerous locations. Its business office is located at
+809 North 1500 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887, email
+business@pglaf.org. Email contact links and up to date contact
+information can be found at the Foundation's web site and official
+page at https://pglaf.org
+
+For additional contact information:
+ Dr. Gregory B. Newby
+ Chief Executive and Director
+ gbnewby@pglaf.org
+
+
+Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg
+Literary Archive Foundation
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without wide
+spread public support and donations to carry out its mission of
+increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be
+freely distributed in machine readable form accessible by the widest
+array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations
+($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt
+status with the IRS.
+
+The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating
+charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United
+States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a
+considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up
+with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations
+where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To
+SEND DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any
+particular state visit https://pglaf.org
+
+While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we
+have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition
+against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who
+approach us with offers to donate.
+
+International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make
+any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from
+outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff.
+
+Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation
+methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other
+ways including including checks, online payments and credit card
+donations. To donate, please visit: https://pglaf.org/donate
+
+
+Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
+works.
+
+Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project Gutenberg-tm
+concept of a library of electronic works that could be freely shared
+with anyone. For thirty years, he produced and distributed Project
+Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer support.
+
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed
+editions, all of which are confirmed as Public Domain in the U.S.
+unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not necessarily
+keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper edition.
+
+
+Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search facility:
+
+ https://www.gutenberg.org
+
+This Web site includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm,
+including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary
+Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to
+subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks.
+
+
+</pre>
+
+</body>
+</html>