diff options
Diffstat (limited to '15207-h')
| -rw-r--r-- | 15207-h/15207-h.htm | 8659 |
1 files changed, 8659 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/15207-h/15207-h.htm b/15207-h/15207-h.htm new file mode 100644 index 0000000..2c9c81f --- /dev/null +++ b/15207-h/15207-h.htm @@ -0,0 +1,8659 @@ +<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" + "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> +<html> +<head> +<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1" /> +<title>The Project Gutenberg eBook of The New Physics and Its Evolution, by Lucien Poincare</title> +<style type="text/css"> +/*<![CDATA[ XML blockout */ +<!-- + p { margin-top: .75em; + text-align: justify; + margin-bottom: .75em; + } + h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6 { + text-align: center; /* all headings centered */ + clear: both; + } + hr { width: 33%; + margin-top: 2em; + margin-bottom: 2em; + margin-left: auto; + margin-right: auto; + clear: both; + } + + table {margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;} + + body{margin-left: 10%; + margin-right: 10%; + } + + .linenum {position: absolute; top: auto; left: 4%;} /* poetry number */ + .blockquot{margin-left: 5%; margin-right: 10%;} + .pagenum {position: absolute; left: 92%; font-size: smaller; text-align: right;} /* page numbers */ + .sidenote {width: 20%; padding-bottom: .5em; padding-top: .5em; + padding-left: .5em; padding-right: .5em; margin-left: 1em; + float: right; clear: right; margin-top: 1em; + font-size: smaller; background: #eeeeee; border: dashed 1px;} + + .bb {border-bottom: solid 2px;} + .bl {border-left: solid 2px;} + .bt {border-top: solid 2px;} + .br {border-right: solid 2px;} + .bbox {border: solid 2px;} + + .center {text-align: center;} + .smcap {font-variant: small-caps;} + + .figcenter {margin: auto; text-align: center;} + + .figleft {float: left; clear: left; margin-left: 0; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-top: + 1em; margin-right: 1em; padding: 0; text-align: center;} + + .figright {float: right; clear: right; margin-left: 1em; margin-bottom: 1em; + margin-top: 1em; margin-right: 0; padding: 0; text-align: center;} + + .footnotes {border: dashed 1px;} + .footnote {margin-left: 10%; margin-right: 10%; font-size: 0.9em;} + .footnote .label {position: absolute; right: 84%; text-align: right;} + .fnanchor {vertical-align: super; font-size: .8em; text-decoration: none;} + + .poem {margin-left:10%; margin-right:10%; text-align: left;} + .poem br {display: none;} + .poem .stanza {margin: 1em 0em 1em 0em;} + .poem span {display: block; margin: 0; padding-left: 3em; text-indent: -3em;} + .poem span.i2 {display: block; margin-left: 2em;} + .poem span.i4 {display: block; margin-left: 4em;} + + .textbold {font-weight: bold;} + hr.full { width: 100%; } + pre {font-size: 8pt;} + + // --> + /* XML end ]]>*/ +</style> +</head> +<body> +<h1>The Project Gutenberg eBook, The New Physics and Its Evolution, by Lucien +Poincare</h1> +<pre> +This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with +almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or +re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included +with this eBook or online at <a href = "https://www.gutenberg.org">www.gutenberg.org</a></pre> +<p>Title: The New Physics and Its Evolution</p> +<p>Author: Lucien Poincare</p> +<p>Release Date: February 28, 2005 [eBook #15207]</p> +<p>Language: En</p> +<p>Character set encoding: ISO-8859-1</p> +<p>***START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE NEW PHYSICS AND ITS EVOLUTION***</p> +<p> </p> +<h4>E-text prepared by Jeff Spirko, Juliet Sutherland, Jim Land,<br /> + and the Project Gutenberg Online Distributed Proofreading Team</h4> +<p> </p> +<hr class="full" /> +<p> </p> +<h3>The International Scientific Series</h3> +<h1>THE NEW PHYSICS</h1> +<h2>AND ITS EVOLUTION</h2> +<h3>BY</h3> +<h2>LUCIEN POINCARÉ</h2> +<p class="center">Inspéctéur-General de l'Instruction +Publique</p> +<p class="center">Being the Authorized Translation of<br /> +"LA PHYSIQUE MODERNE, SON ÉVOLUTION"</p> +<p class="center">NEW YORK<br /> +D. APPLETON AND COMPANY<br /> +1909</p> +<hr style="width: 65%;" /> +<h2><a name="Prefatory_Note" id="Prefatory_Note"></a>Prefatory +Note</h2> +<p>M. Lucien Poincaré is one of the distinguished family of +mathematicians which has during the last few years given a Minister +of Finance to the Republic and a President to the Académie +des Sciences. He is also one of the nineteen Inspectors-General of +Public Instruction who are charged with the duty of visiting the +different universities and <i>lycées</i> in France and of +reporting upon the state of the studies there pursued. Hence he is +in an excellent position to appreciate at its proper value the +extraordinary change which has lately revolutionized physical +science, while his official position has kept him aloof from the +controversies aroused by the discovery of radium and by recent +speculations on the constitution of matter.</p> +<p>M. Poincaré's object and method in writing the book are +sufficiently explained in the preface which follows; but it may be +remarked that the best of methods has its defects, and the +excessive condensation which has alone made it possible to include +the last decade's discoveries in physical science within a compass +of some 300 pages has, perhaps, made the facts here noted +assimilable with difficulty by the untrained reader. To remedy this +as far as possible, I have prefixed to the present translation a +table of contents so extended as to form a fairly complete digest +of the book, while full indexes of authors and subjects have also +been added. The few notes necessary either for better elucidation +of the terms employed, or for giving account of discoveries made +while these pages were passing through the press, may be +distinguished from the author's own by the signature "ED."</p> +<p>THE EDITOR.</p> +<p>ROYAL INSTITUTION OF GREAT BRITAIN, April 1907.</p> +<hr style="width: 65%;" /> +<h2><a name="Authors_Preface" id="Authors_Preface"></a>Author's +Preface</h2> +<p>During the last ten years so many works have accumulated in the +domain of Physics, and so many new theories have been propounded, +that those who follow with interest the progress of science, and +even some professed scholars, absorbed as they are in their own +special studies, find themselves at sea in a confusion more +apparent than real.</p> +<p>It has therefore occurred to me that it might be useful to write +a book which, while avoiding too great insistence on purely +technical details, should try to make known the general results at +which physicists have lately arrived, and to indicate the direction +and import which should be ascribed to those speculations on the +constitution of matter, and the discussions on the nature of first +principles, to which it has become, so to speak, the fashion of the +present day to devote oneself.</p> +<p>I have endeavoured throughout to rely only on the experiments in +which we can place the most confidence, and, above all, to show how +the ideas prevailing at the present day have been formed, by +tracing their evolution, and rapidly examining the successive +transformations which have brought them to their present +condition.</p> +<p>In order to understand the text, the reader will have no need to +consult any treatise on physics, for I have throughout given the +necessary definitions and set forth the fundamental facts. +Moreover, while strictly employing exact expressions, I have +avoided the use of mathematical language. Algebra is an admirable +tongue, but there are many occasions where it can only be used with +much discretion.</p> +<p>Nothing would be easier than to point out many great omissions +from this little volume; but some, at all events, are not +involuntary.</p> +<p>Certain questions which are still too confused have been put on +one side, as have a few others which form an important collection +for a special study to be possibly made later. Thus, as regards +electrical phenomena, the relations between electricity and optics, +as also the theories of ionization, the electronic hypothesis, +etc., have been treated at some length; but it has not been thought +necessary to dilate upon the modes of production and utilization of +the current, upon the phenomena of magnetism, or upon all the +applications which belong to the domain of Electrotechnics.</p> +<p>L. POINCARÉ.</p> +<hr style="width: 65%;" /> +<h2><a name="Contents" id="Contents"></a>Contents</h2> +<p><a href="#Prefatory_Note"><b>EDITOR'S PREFATORY +NOTE</b></a><br /> +<br /> +<a href="#Authors_Preface"><b>AUTHOR'S PREFACE</b></a><br /> +<br /> +<a href="#Contents"><b>TABLE OF CONTENTS</b></a><br /> +<br /> +<a href="#CHAPTER_I"><b>CHAPTER I</b></a><br /></p> +<p>THE EVOLUTION OF PHYSICS</p> +<p>Revolutionary change in modern Physics only apparent: evolution +not revolution the rule in Physical Theory— Revival of +metaphysical speculation and influence of Descartes: all phenomena +reduced to matter and movement— Modern physicists challenge +this: physical, unlike mechanical, phenomena seldom +reversible—Two schools, one considering experimental laws +imperative, the other merely studying relations of magnitudes: both +teach something of truth—Third or eclectic school— Is +mechanics a branch of electrical science?<br /> +<br /></p> +<p><strong><a href="#CHAPTER_II">CHAPTER II</a></strong><br /></p> +<p>MEASUREMENTS</p> +<p>§ 1. <i>Metrology</i>: Lord Kelvin's view of its +necessity— Its definition § 2. <i>The Measure of +Length</i>: Necessity for unit— Absolute length—History +of Standard—Description of Standard Metre—Unit of +wave-lengths preferable—The International Metre § 3. +<i>The Measure of Mass</i>: Distinction between mass and +weight—Objections to legal kilogramme and its +precision—Possible improvement § 4. <i>The Measure of +Time</i>: Unit of time the second—Alternative units +proposed—Improvements in chronometry and invar § 5. +<i>The Measure of Temperature:</i> Fundamental and derived +units—Ordinary unit of temperature purely +arbitrary—Absolute unit mass of H at pressure of 1 m. of Hg +at 0° C.—Divergence of thermometric and thermodynamic +scales—Helium thermometer for low, thermo-electric couple for +high, temperatures—Lummer and Pringsheim's improvements in +thermometry. § 6. <i>Derived Units and Measure of Energy:</i> +Importance of erg as unit—Calorimeter usual means of +determination—Photometric units. § 7. <i>Measure of +Physical Constants:</i> Constant of gravitation—Discoveries +of Cavendish, Vernon Boys, Eötvös, Richarz and +Krigar-Menzel—Michelson's improvements on Fizeau and +Foucault's experiments— Measure of speed of light.<br /> +<br /></p> +<p><a href="#CHAPTER_III"><b>CHAPTER III</b></a><br /></p> +<p>PRINCIPLES</p> +<p>§ 1. <i>The Principles of Physics:</i> The Principles of +Mechanics affected by recent discoveries—Is mass +indestructible?—Landolt and Heydweiller's experiments +—Lavoisier's law only approximately true—Curie's +principle of symmetry. § 2. <i>The Principle of the +Conservation of Energy:</i> Its evolution: Bernoulli, Lavoisier and +Laplace, Young, Rumford, Davy, Sadi Carnot, and Robert +Mayer—Mayer's drawbacks—Error of those who would make +mechanics part of energetics—Verdet's +predictions—Rankine inventor of energetics—Usefulness +of Work as standard form of energy—Physicists who think +matter form of energy— Objections to this—Philosophical +value of conservation doctrine. § 3. <i>The Principle of +Carnot and Clausius:</i> Originality of Carnot's principle that +fall of temperature necessary for production of work by heat— +Clausius' postulate that heat cannot pass from cold to hot body +without accessory phenomena—Entropy result of +this—Definition of entropy—Entropy tends to increase +incessantly—A magnitude which measures evolution of +system—Clausius' and Kelvin's deduction that heat end of all +energy in Universe—Objection to this— Carnot's +principle not necessarily referable to mechanics —Brownian +movements—Lippmann's objection to kinetic hypothesis. § +4. <i>Thermodynamics:</i> Historical work of Massieu, Willard +Gibbs, Helmholtz, and Duhem—Willard Gibbs founder of +thermodynamic statics, Van t'Hoff its reviver—The Phase +Law—Raveau explains it without thermodynamics. § 5. +<i>Atomism:</i> Connection of subject with preceding Hannequin's +essay on the atomic hypothesis—Molecular physics in +disfavour—Surface-tension, etc., vanishes when molecule +reached—Size of molecule—Kinetic theory of +gases—Willard Gibbs and Boltzmann introduce into it law of +probabilities—Mean free path of gaseous +molecules—Application to optics—Final division of +matter.<br /> +<br /></p> +<p><a href="#CHAPTER_IV"><b>CHAPTER IV</b></a><br /></p> +<p>THE VARIOUS STATES OF MATTER</p> +<p>§ 1. <i>The Statics of Fluids</i>: Researches of Andrews, +Cailletet, and others on liquid and gaseous states— Amagat's +experiments—Van der Waals' equation—Discovery of +corresponding states—Amagat's superposed +diagrams—Exceptions to law—Statics of mixed +fluids— Kamerlingh Onnes' researches—Critical +Constants— Characteristic equation of fluid not yet +ascertainable. § 2. <i>The Liquefaction of Gases and Low +Temperatures</i>: Linde's, Siemens', and Claude's methods of +liquefying gases—Apparatus of Claude described—Dewar's +experiments—Modification of electrical properties of matter +by extreme cold: of magnetic and chemical— Vitality of +bacteria unaltered—Ramsay's discovery of rare gases of +atmosphere—Their distribution in nature—Liquid +hydrogen—Helium. § 3. <i>Solids and Liquids</i>: +Continuity of Solid and Liquid States—Viscosity common to +both—Also Rigidity— Spring's analogies of solids and +liquids—Crystallization —Lehmann's liquid +crystals—Their existence doubted —Tamman's view of +discontinuity between crystalline and liquid states. § 4. +<i>The Deformation of Solids</i>: Elasticity— Hoocke's, +Bach's, and Bouasse's researches—Voigt on the elasticity of +crystals—Elastic and permanent deformations—Brillouin's +states of unstable equilibria—Duhem and the thermodynamic +postulates— Experimental confirmation—Guillaume's +researches on nickel steel—Alloys.<br /> +<br /></p> +<p><a href="#CHAPTER_V"><b>CHAPTER V</b></a><br /></p> +<p>SOLUTIONS AND ELECTROLYTIC DISSOCIATION</p> +<p>§ 1. <i>Solution</i>: Kirchhoff's, Gibb's, Duhem's and Van +t'Hoff's researches. § 2. <i>Osmosis</i>: History of +phenomenon—Traube and biologists establish existence of +semi-permeable walls—Villard's experiments with +gases—Pfeffer shows osmotic pressure proportional to +concentration— Disagreement as to cause of phenomenon. § +3. <i>Osmosis applied to Solution</i>: Van t'Hoff's +discoveries—Analogy between dissolved body and perfect +gas—Faults in analogy. § 4. <i>Electrolytic +Dissociation</i>: Van t'Hoff's and Arrhenius' +researches—Ionic hypothesis of—Fierce opposition to at +first—Arrhenius' ideas now triumphant —Advantages of +Arrhenius' hypothesis—"The ions which react"—Ostwald's +conclusions from this—Nernst's theory of +Electrolysis—Electrolysis of gases makes electronic theory +probable—Faraday's two laws—Valency— Helmholtz's +consequences from Faraday's laws.<br /> +<br /></p> +<p><a href="#CHAPTER_VI"><b>CHAPTER VI</b></a><br /></p> +<p>THE ETHER</p> +<p>§ 1. <i>The Luminiferous Ether</i>: First idea of Ether due +to Descartes—Ether must be imponderable—Fresnel shows +light vibrations to be transverse—Transverse vibrations +cannot exist in fluid—Ether must be discontinuous. § 2. +<i>Radiations</i>: Wave-lengths and their +measurements—Rubens' and Lenard's researches— +Stationary waves and colour-photography—Fresnel's hypothesis +opposed by Neumann—Wiener's and Cotton's experiments. § +3. <i>TheElectromagnetic Ether</i>: Ampère's advocacy of +mathematical expression—Faraday first shows influence of +medium in electricity—Maxwell's proof that light-waves +electromagnetic—His unintelligibility—Required +confirmation of theory by Hertz. § 4. <i>Electrical +Oscillations</i>: Hertz's experiments— Blondlot proves +electromagnetic disturbance propagated with speed of +light—Discovery of ether waves intermediate between Hertzian +and visible ones—Rubens' and Nichols' +experiments—Hertzian and light rays contrasted—Pressure +of light. § 5. <i>The X-Rays</i>: Röntgen's +discovery—Properties of X-rays—Not +homogeneous—Rutherford and M'Clung's experiments on energy +corresponding to—Barkla's experiments on polarisation +of—Their speed that of light—Are they merely +ultra-violet?—Stokes and Wiechert's theory of independent +pulsations generally preferred—J.J. Thomson's idea of their +formation— Sutherland's and Le Bon's theories—The +N-Rays— Blondlot's discovery—Experiments cannot be +repeated outside France—Gutton and Mascart's +confirmation— Negative experiments prove +nothing—Supposed wave-length of N-rays. § 6. <i>The +Ether and Gravitation</i>: Descartes' and Newton's ideas on +gravitation—Its speed and other extraordinary +characteristics—Lesage's hypothesis—Crémieux' +experiments with drops of liquids—Hypothesis of ether +insufficient.<br /> +<br /></p> +<p><a href="#CHAPTER_VII"><b>CHAPTER VII</b></a><br /></p> +<p>WIRELESS TELEGRAPHY</p> +<p>§ 1. Histories of wireless telegraphy already written, and +difficulties of the subject. § 2. Two systems: that which uses +the material media (earth, air, or water), and that which employs +ether only. § 3. Use of earth as return wire by Steinheil +—Morse's experiments with water of canal—Seine used as +return wire during siege of Paris—Johnson and Melhuish's +Indian experiments—Preece's telegraph over Bristol +Channel—He welcomes Marconi. § 4. Early attempts at +transmission of messages through ether—Experiments of +Rathenau and others. § 5. Forerunners of ether telegraphy: +Clerk Maxwell and Hertz—Dolbear, Hughes, and Graham Bell. +§ 6. Telegraphy by Hertzian waves first suggested by +Threlfall—Crookes', Tesla's, Lodge's, Rutherford's, and +Popoff's contributions—Marconi first makes it practicable. +§ 7. The receiver in wireless telegraphy—Varley's, +Calzecchi—Onesti's, and Branly's researches— +Explanation of coherer still obscure. § 8. Wireless telegraphy +enters the commercial stage— Defect of Marconi's +system—Braun's, Armstrong's, Lee de Forest's, and Fessenden's +systems make use of earth— Hertz and Marconi entitled to +foremost place among discoverers.<br /> +<br /></p> +<p><a href="#CHAPTER_VIII"><b>CHAPTER VIII</b></a><br /></p> +<p>THE CONDUCTIVITY OF GASES AND THE IONS</p> +<p>§ 1. <i>The Conductivity of Gases</i>: Relations of matter +to ether cardinal problem—Conductivity of gases at first +misapprehended—Erman's forgotten researches—Giese first +notices phenomenon—Experiment with X-rays— J.J. +Thomson's interpretation—Ionized gas not obedient to Ohm's +law—Discharge of charged conductors by ionized gas. § 2. +<i>The Condensation of water-vapour by Ion</i>s: Vapour will not +condense without nucleus—Wilson's experiments on electrical +condensation—Wilson and Thomson's counting +experiment—Twenty million ions per c.cm. of +gas—Estimate of charge borne by ion— Speed of +charges—Zeleny's and Langevin's experiments—Negative +ions 1/1000 of size of atoms—Natural unit of electricity or +electrons. § 3. <i>How Ions are Produced:</i> Various causes +of ionization—Moreau's experiments with alkaline +salts—Barus and Bloch on ionization by phosphorus +vapours—Ionization always result of shock. § 4. +<i>Electrons in Metals:</i> Movement of electrons in metals +foreshadowed by Weber—Giese's, Riecke's, Drude's, and J.J. +Thomson's researches—Path of ions in metals and conduction of +heat—Theory of Lorentz—Hesehus' explanation of +electrification by contact—Emission of electrons by charged +body— Thomson's measurement of positive ions.<br /> +<br /></p> +<p><a href="#CHAPTER_IX"><b>CHAPTER IX</b></a><br /></p> +<p>CATHODE RAYS AND RADIOACTIVE BODIES</p> +<p>§ 1. <i>The Cathode Rays:</i> History of +discovery—Crookes' theory—Lenard rays—Perrin's +proof of negative charge—Cathode rays give rise to +X-rays—The canal rays—Villard's researches and +magneto-cathode rays— Ionoplasty—Thomson's measurements +of speed of rays —All atoms can be dissociated. § 2. +<i>Radioactive Substances:</i> Uranic rays of Niepce de St Victor +and Becquerel—General radioactivity of matter—Le Bon's +and Rutherford's comparison of uranic with X rays—Pierre and +Mme. Curie's discovery of polonium and radium—Their +characteristics—Debierne discovers actinium. § 3. +<i>Radiations and Emanations of Radioactive Bodies:</i> Giesel's, +Becquerel's, and Rutherford's Researches—Alpha, beta, and +gamma rays—Sagnac's secondary rays—Crookes' +spinthariscope—The emanation —Ramsay and Soddy's +researches upon it—Transformations of radioactive +bodies—Their order. § 4. <i>Disaggregation of Matter and +Atomic Energy:</i> Actual transformations of matter in radioactive +bodies —Helium or lead final product—Ultimate +disappearance of radium from earth—Energy liberated by +radium: its amount and source—Suggested models of radioactive +atoms—Generalization from radioactive phenomena -Le Bon's +theories—Ballistic hypothesis generally admitted—Does +energy come from without—Sagnac's experiments—Elster +and Geitel's <i>contra</i>.<br /> +<br /></p> +<p><a href="#CHAPTER_X"><b>CHAPTER X</b></a><br /></p> +<p>THE ETHER AND MATTER</p> +<p>§ 1. <i>The Relations between the Ether and Matter:</i> +Attempts to reduce all matter to forms of ether—Emission and +absorption phenomena show reciprocal action— Laws of +radiation—Radiation of gases—Production of +spectrum—Differences between light and sound variations show +difference of media—Cauchy's, Briot's, Carvallo's and +Boussinesq's researches—Helmholtz's and Poincaré's +electromagnetic theories of dispersion. § 2. <i>The Theory of +Lorentz:</i>—Mechanics fails to explain relations between +ether and matter—Lorentz predicts action of magnet on +spectrum—Zeeman's experiment —Later researches upon +Zeeman effect— Multiplicity of electrons—Lorentz's +explanation of thermoelectric phenomena by +electrons—Maxwell's and Lorentz's theories do not +agree—Lorentz's probably more correct—Earth's movement +in relation to ether. § 3. <i>The Mass of Electrons:</i> +Thomson's and Max Abraham's view that inertia of charged body due +to charge—Longitudinal and transversal mass—Speed of +electrons cannot exceed that of light—Ratio of charge to mass +and its variation—Electron simple electric +charge—Phenomena produced by its acceleration. § 4. +<i>New Views on Ether and Matter:</i> Insufficiency of Larmor's +view—Ether definable by electric and magnetic fields—Is +matter all electrons? Atom probably positive centre surrounded by +negative electrons—Ignorance concerning positive +particles—Successive transformations of matter probable +—Gravitation still unaccounted for.<br /> +<br /></p> +<p><a href="#CHAPTER_XI"><b>CHAPTER XI</b></a><br /></p> +<p>THE FUTURE OF PHYSICS</p> +<p>Persistence of ambition to discover supreme principle in +physics—Supremacy of electron theory at present +time—Doubtless destined to disappear like others— +Constant progress of science predicted—Immense field open +before it.</p> +<p>INDEX OF NAMES</p> +<p>INDEX OF SUBJECTS</p> +<p><br /> +<br /></p> +<hr style="width: 65%;" /> +<p><br /></p> +<h2>The New Physics and its Evolution</h2> +<p><br /></p> +<hr style="width: 65%;" /> +<p><br /> +<br /></p> +<h3><a name="CHAPTER_I" id="CHAPTER_I"></a>CHAPTER I</h3> +<h2>THE EVOLUTION OF PHYSICS</h2> +<p>The now numerous public which tries with some success to keep +abreast of the movement in science, from seeing its mental habits +every day upset, and from occasionally witnessing unexpected +discoveries that produce a more lively sensation from their +reaction on social life, is led to suppose that we live in a really +exceptional epoch, scored by profound crises and illustrated by +extraordinary discoveries, whose singularity surpasses everything +known in the past. Thus we often hear it said that physics, in +particular, has of late years undergone a veritable revolution; +that all its principles have been made new, that all the edifices +constructed by our fathers have been overthrown, and that on the +field thus cleared has sprung up the most abundant harvest that has +ever enriched the domain of science.</p> +<p>It is in fact true that the crop becomes richer and more +fruitful, thanks to the development of our laboratories, and that +the quantity of seekers has considerably increased in all +countries, while their quality has not diminished. We should be +sustaining an absolute paradox, and at the same time committing a +crying injustice, were we to contest the high importance of recent +progress, and to seek to diminish the glory of contemporary +physicists. Yet it may be as well not to give way to exaggerations, +however pardonable, and to guard against facile illusions. On +closer examination it will be seen that our predecessors might at +several periods in history have conceived, as legitimately as +ourselves, similar sentiments of scientific pride, and have felt +that the world was about to appear to them transformed and under an +aspect until then absolutely unknown.</p> +<p>Let us take an example which is salient enough; for, however +arbitrary the conventional division of time may appear to a +physicist's eyes, it is natural, when instituting a comparison +between two epochs, to choose those which extend over a space of +half a score of years, and are separated from each other by the gap +of a century. Let us, then, go back a hundred years and examine +what would have been the state of mind of an erudite amateur who +had read and understood the chief publications on physical research +between 1800 and 1810.</p> +<p>Let us suppose that this intelligent and attentive spectator +witnessed in 1800 the discovery of the galvanic battery by Volta. +He might from that moment have felt a presentiment that a +prodigious transformation was about to occur in our mode of +regarding electrical phenomena. Brought up in the ideas of Coulomb +and Franklin, he might till then have imagined that electricity had +unveiled nearly all its mysteries, when an entirely original +apparatus suddenly gave birth to applications of the highest +interest, and excited the blossoming of theories of immense +philosophical extent.</p> +<p>In the treatises on physics published a little later, we find +traces of the astonishment produced by this sudden revelation of a +new world. "Electricity," wrote the Abbé Haüy, +"enriched by the labour of so many distinguished physicists, seemed +to have reached the term when a science has no further important +steps before it, and only leaves to those who cultivate it the hope +of confirming the discoveries of their predecessors, and of casting +a brighter light on the truths revealed. One would have thought +that all researches for diversifying the results of experiment were +exhausted, and that theory itself could only be augmented by the +addition of a greater degree of precision to the applications of +principles already known. While science thus appeared to be making +for repose, the phenomena of the convulsive movements observed by +Galvani in the muscles of a frog when connected by metal were +brought to the attention and astonishment of physicists.... Volta, +in that Italy which had been the cradle of the new knowledge, +discovered the principle of its true theory in a fact which reduces +the explanation of all the phenomena in question to the simple +contact of two substances of different nature. This fact became in +his hands the germ of the admirable apparatus to which its manner +of being and its fecundity assign one of the chief places among +those with which the genius of mankind has enriched physics."</p> +<p>Shortly afterwards, our amateur would learn that Carlisle and +Nicholson had decomposed water by the aid of a battery; then, that +Davy, in 1803, had produced, by the help of the same battery, a +quite unexpected phenomenon, and had succeeded in preparing metals +endowed with marvellous properties, beginning with substances of an +earthy appearance which had been known for a long time, but whose +real nature had not been discovered.</p> +<p>In another order of ideas, surprises as prodigious would wait +for our amateur. Commencing with 1802, he might have read the +admirable series of memoirs which Young then published, and might +thereby have learned how the study of the phenomena of diffraction +led to the belief that the undulation theory, which, since the +works of Newton seemed irretrievably condemned, was, on the +contrary, beginning quite a new life. A little later—in +1808—he might have witnessed the discovery made by Malus of +polarization by reflexion, and would have been able to note, no +doubt with stupefaction, that under certain conditions a ray of +light loses the property of being reflected.</p> +<p>He might also have heard of one Rumford, who was then +promulgating very singular ideas on the nature of heat, who thought +that the then classical notions might be false, that caloric does +not exist as a fluid, and who, in 1804, even demonstrated that heat +is created by friction. A few years later he would learn that +Charles had enunciated a capital law on the dilatation of gases; +that Pierre Prevost, in 1809, was making a study, full of original +ideas, on radiant heat. In the meantime he would not have failed to +read volumes iii. and iv. of the <i>Mecanique celeste</i> of +Laplace, published in 1804 and 1805, and he might, no doubt, have +thought that before long mathematics would enable physical science +to develop with unforeseen safety.</p> +<p>All these results may doubtless be compared in importance with +the present discoveries. When strange metals like potassium and +sodium were isolated by an entirely new method, the astonishment +must have been on a par with that caused in our time by the +magnificent discovery of radium. The polarization of light is a +phenomenon as undoubtedly singular as the existence of the X rays; +and the upheaval produced in natural philosophy by the theories of +the disintegration of matter and the ideas concerning electrons is +probably not more considerable than that produced in the theories +of light and heat by the works of Young and Rumford.</p> +<p>If we now disentangle ourselves from contingencies, it will be +understood that in reality physical science progresses by evolution +rather than by revolution. Its march is continuous. The facts which +our theories enable us to discover, subsist and are linked together +long after these theories have disappeared. Out of the materials of +former edifices overthrown, new dwellings are constantly being +reconstructed.</p> +<p>The labour of our forerunners never wholly perishes. The ideas +of yesterday prepare for those of to-morrow; they contain them, so +to speak, <i>in potentia</i>. Science is in some sort a living +organism, which gives birth to an indefinite series of new beings +taking the places of the old, and which evolves according to the +nature of its environment, adapting itself to external conditions, +and healing at every step the wounds which contact with reality may +have occasioned.</p> +<p>Sometimes this evolution is rapid, sometimes it is slow enough; +but it obeys the ordinary laws. The wants imposed by its +surroundings create certain organs in science. The problems set to +physicists by the engineer who wishes to facilitate transport or to +produce better illumination, or by the doctor who seeks to know how +such and such a remedy acts, or, again, by the physiologist +desirous of understanding the mechanism of the gaseous and liquid +exchanges between the cell and the outer medium, cause new chapters +in physics to appear, and suggest researches adapted to the +necessities of actual life.</p> +<p>The evolution of the different parts of physics does not, +however, take place with equal speed, because the circumstances in +which they are placed are not equally favourable. Sometimes a whole +series of questions will appear forgotten, and will live only with +a languishing existence; and then some accidental circumstance +suddenly brings them new life, and they become the object of +manifold labours, engross public attention, and invade nearly the +whole domain of science.</p> +<p>We have in our own day witnessed such a spectacle. The discovery +of the X rays—a discovery which physicists no doubt consider +as the logical outcome of researches long pursued by a few scholars +working in silence and obscurity on an otherwise much neglected +subject—seemed to the public eye to have inaugurated a new +era in the history of physics. If, as is the case, however, the +extraordinary scientific movement provoked by Röntgen's +sensational experiments has a very remote origin, it has, at least, +been singularly quickened by the favourable conditions created by +the interest aroused in its astonishing applications to +radiography.</p> +<p>A lucky chance has thus hastened an evolution already taking +place, and theories previously outlined have received a singular +development. Without wishing to yield too much to what may be +considered a whim of fashion, we cannot, if we are to note in this +book the stage actually reached in the continuous march of physics, +refrain from giving a clearly preponderant place to the questions +suggested by the study of the new radiations. At the present time +it is these questions which move us the most; they have shown us +unknown horizons, and towards the fields recently opened to +scientific activity the daily increasing crowd of searchers rushes +in rather disorderly fashion.</p> +<p>One of the most interesting consequences of the recent +discoveries has been to rehabilitate in the eyes of scholars, +speculations relating to the constitution of matter, and, in a more +general way, metaphysical problems. Philosophy has, of course, +never been completely separated from science; but in times past +many physicists dissociated themselves from studies which they +looked upon as unreal word-squabbles, and sometimes not +unreasonably abstained from joining in discussions which seemed to +them idle and of rather puerile subtlety. They had seen the ruin of +most of the systems built up <i>a priori</i> by daring +philosophers, and deemed it more prudent to listen to the advice +given by Kirchhoff and "to substitute the description of facts for +a sham explanation of nature."</p> +<p>It should however be remarked that these physicists somewhat +deceived themselves as to the value of their caution, and that the +mistrust they manifested towards philosophical speculations did not +preclude their admitting, unknown to themselves, certain axioms +which they did not discuss, but which are, properly speaking, +metaphysical conceptions. They were unconsciously speaking a +language taught them by their predecessors, of which they made no +attempt to discover the origin. It is thus that it was readily +considered evident that physics must necessarily some day re-enter +the domain of mechanics, and thence it was postulated that +everything in nature is due to movement. We, further, accepted the +principles of the classical mechanics without discussing their +legitimacy.</p> +<p>This state of mind was, even of late years, that of the most +illustrious physicists. It is manifested, quite sincerely and +without the slightest reserve, in all the classical works devoted +to physics. Thus Verdet, an illustrious professor who has had the +greatest and most happy influence on the intellectual formation of +a whole generation of scholars, and whose works are even at the +present day very often consulted, wrote: "The true problem of the +physicist is always to reduce all phenomena to that which seems to +us the simplest and clearest, that is to say, to movement." In his +celebrated course of lectures at l'École Polytechnique, +Jamin likewise said: "Physics will one day form a chapter of +general mechanics;" and in the preface to his excellent course of +lectures on physics, M. Violle, in 1884, thus expresses himself: +"The science of nature tends towards mechanics by a necessary +evolution, the physicist being able to establish solid theories +only on the laws of movement." The same idea is again met with in +the words of Cornu in 1896: "The general tendency should be to show +how the facts observed and the phenomena measured, though first +brought together by empirical laws, end, by the impulse of +successive progressions, in coming under the general laws of +rational mechanics;" and the same physicist showed clearly that in +his mind this connexion of phenomena with mechanics had a deep and +philosophical reason, when, in the fine discourse pronounced by him +at the opening ceremony of the Congrès de Physique in 1900, +he exclaimed: "The mind of Descartes soars over modern physics, or +rather, I should say, he is their luminary. The further we +penetrate into the knowledge of natural phenomena, the clearer and +the more developed becomes the bold Cartesian conception regarding +the mechanism of the universe. There is nothing in the physical +world but matter and movement."</p> +<p>If we adopt this conception, we are led to construct mechanical +representations of the material world, and to imagine movements in +the different parts of bodies capable of reproducing all the +manifestations of nature. The kinematic knowledge of these +movements, that is to say, the determination of the position, +speed, and acceleration at a given moment of all the parts of the +system, or, on the other hand, their dynamical study, enabling us +to know what is the action of these parts on each other, would then +be sufficient to enable us to foretell all that can occur in the +domain of nature.</p> +<p>This was the great thought clearly expressed by the +Encyclopædists of the eighteenth century; and if the +necessity of interpreting the phenomena of electricity or light led +the physicists of last century to imagine particular fluids which +seemed to obey with some difficulty the ordinary rules of +mechanics, these physicists still continued to retain their hope in +the future, and to treat the idea of Descartes as an ideal to be +reached sooner or later.</p> +<p>Certain scholars—particularly those of the English +School—outrunning experiment, and pushing things to extremes, +took pleasure in proposing very curious mechanical models which +were often strange images of reality. The most illustrious of them, +Lord Kelvin, may be considered as their representative type, and he +has himself said: "It seems to me that the true sense of the +question, Do we or do we not understand a particular subject in +physics? is—Can we make a mechanical model which corresponds +to it? I am never satisfied so long as I have been unable to make a +mechanical model of the object. If I am able to do so, I understand +it. If I cannot make such a model, I do not understand it." But it +must be acknowledged that some of the models thus devised have +become excessively complicated, and this complication has for a +long time discouraged all but very bold minds. In addition, when it +became a question of penetrating into the mechanism of molecules, +and we were no longer satisfied to look at matter as a mass, the +mechanical solutions seemed undetermined and the stability of the +edifices thus constructed was insufficiently demonstrated.</p> +<p>Returning then to our starting-point, many contemporary +physicists wish to subject Descartes' idea to strict criticism. +From the philosophical point of view, they first enquire whether it +is really demonstrated that there exists nothing else in the +knowable than matter and movement. They ask themselves whether it +is not habit and tradition in particular which lead us to ascribe +to mechanics the origin of phenomena. Perhaps also a question of +sense here comes in. Our senses, which are, after all, the only +windows open towards external reality, give us a view of one side +of the world only; evidently we only know the universe by the +relations which exist between it and our organisms, and these +organisms are peculiarly sensitive to movement.</p> +<p>Nothing, however, proves that those acquisitions which are the +most ancient in historical order ought, in the development of +science, to remain the basis of our knowledge. Nor does any theory +prove that our perceptions are an exact indication of reality. Many +reasons, on the contrary, might be invoked which tend to compel us +to see in nature phenomena which cannot be reduced to movement.</p> +<p>Mechanics as ordinarily understood is the study of reversible +phenomena. If there be given to the parameter which represents +time,<a name="FNanchor_1_1" id="FNanchor_1_1"></a><a href= +"#Footnote_1_1" class="fnanchor">[1]</a> and which has assumed +increasing values during the duration of the phenomena, decreasing +values which make it go the opposite way, the whole system will +again pass through exactly the same stages as before, and all the +phenomena will unfold themselves in reversed order. In physics, the +contrary rule appears very general, and reversibility generally +does not exist. It is an ideal and limited case, which may be +sometimes approached, but can never, strictly speaking, be met with +in its entirety. No physical phenomenon ever recommences in an +identical manner if its direction be altered. It is true that +certain mathematicians warn us that a mechanics can be devised in +which reversibility would no longer be the rule, but the bold +attempts made in this direction are not wholly satisfactory.</p> +<p>On the other hand, it is established that if a mechanical +explanation of a phenomenon can be given, we can find an infinity +of others which likewise account for all the peculiarities revealed +by experiment. But, as a matter of fact, no one has ever succeeded +in giving an indisputable mechanical representation of the whole +physical world. Even were we disposed to admit the strangest +solutions of the problem; to consent, for example, to be satisfied +with the hidden systems devised by Helmholtz, whereby we ought to +divide variable things into two classes, some accessible, and the +others now and for ever unknown, we should never manage to +construct an edifice to contain all the known facts. Even the very +comprehensive mechanics of a Hertz fails where the classical +mechanics has not succeeded.</p> +<p>Deeming this check irremediable, many contemporary physicists +give up attempts which they look upon as condemned beforehand, and +adopt, to guide them in their researches, a method which at first +sight appears much more modest, and also much more sure. They make +up their minds not to see at once to the bottom of things; they no +longer seek to suddenly strip the last veils from nature, and to +divine her supreme secrets; but they work prudently and advance but +slowly, while on the ground thus conquered foot by foot they +endeavour to establish themselves firmly. They study the various +magnitudes directly accessible to their observation without busying +themselves as to their essence. They measure quantities of heat and +of temperature, differences of potential, currents, and magnetic +fields; and then, varying the conditions, apply the rules of +experimental method, and discover between these magnitudes mutual +relations, while they thus succeed in enunciating laws which +translate and sum up their labours.</p> +<p>These empirical laws, however, themselves bring about by +induction the promulgation of more general laws, which are termed +principles. These principles are originally only the results of +experiments, and experiment allows them besides to be checked, and +their more or less high degree of generality to be verified. When +they have been thus definitely established, they may serve as fresh +starting-points, and, by deduction, lead to very varied +discoveries.</p> +<p>The principles which govern physical science are few in number, +and their very general form gives them a philosophical appearance, +while we cannot long resist the temptation of regarding them as +metaphysical dogmas. It thus happens that the least bold +physicists, those who have wanted to show themselves the most +reserved, are themselves led to forget the experimental character +of the laws they have propounded, and to see in them imperious +beings whose authority, placed above all verification, can no +longer be discussed.</p> +<p>Others, on the contrary, carry prudence to the extent of +timidity. They desire to grievously limit the field of scientific +investigation, and they assign to science a too restricted domain. +They content themselves with representing phenomena by equations, +and think that they ought to submit to calculation magnitudes +experimentally determined, without asking themselves whether these +calculations retain a physical meaning. They are thus led to +reconstruct a physics in which there again appears the idea of +quality, understood, of course, not in the scholastic sense, since +from this quality we can argue with some precision by representing +it under numerical symbols, but still constituting an element of +differentiation and of heterogeneity.</p> +<p>Notwithstanding the errors they may lead to if carried to +excess, both these doctrines render, as a whole, most important +service. It is no bad thing that these contradictory tendencies +should subsist, for this variety in the conception of phenomena +gives to actual science a character of intense life and of +veritable youth, capable of impassioned efforts towards the truth. +Spectators who see such moving and varied pictures passing before +them, experience the feeling that there no longer exist systems +fixed in an immobility which seems that of death. They feel that +nothing is unchangeable; that ceaseless transformations are taking +place before their eyes; and that this continuous evolution and +perpetual change are the necessary conditions of progress.</p> +<p>A great number of seekers, moreover, show themselves on their +own account perfectly eclectic. They adopt, according to their +needs, such or such a manner of looking at nature, and do not +hesitate to utilize very different images when they appear to them +useful and convenient. And, without doubt, they are not wrong, +since these images are only symbols convenient for language. They +allow facts to be grouped and associated, but only present a fairly +distant resemblance with the objective reality. Hence it is not +forbidden to multiply and to modify them according to +circumstances. The really essential thing is to have, as a guide +through the unknown, a map which certainly does not claim to +represent all the aspects of nature, but which, having been drawn +up according to predetermined rules, allows us to follow an +ascertained road in the eternal journey towards the truth.</p> +<p>Among the provisional theories which are thus willingly +constructed by scholars on their journey, like edifices hastily run +up to receive an unforeseen harvest, some still appear very bold +and very singular. Abandoning the search after mechanical models +for all electrical phenomena, certain physicists reverse, so to +speak, the conditions of the problem, and ask themselves whether, +instead of giving a mechanical interpretation to electricity, they +may not, on the contrary, give an electrical interpretation to the +phenomena of matter and motion, and thus merge mechanics itself in +electricity. One thus sees dawning afresh the eternal hope of +co-ordinating all natural phenomena in one grandiose and imposing +synthesis. Whatever may be the fate reserved for such attempts, +they deserve attention in the highest degree; and it is desirable +to examine them carefully if we wish to have an exact idea of the +tendencies of modern physics.</p> +<hr style="width: 65%;" /> +<h3><a name="CHAPTER_II" id="CHAPTER_II"></a>CHAPTER II</h3> +<h2>MEASUREMENTS</h2> +<p class="textbold">§ 1. METROLOGY</p> +<p>Not so very long ago, the scholar was often content with +qualitative observations. Many phenomena were studied without much +trouble being taken to obtain actual measurements. But it is now +becoming more and more understood that to establish the relations +which exist between physical magnitudes, and to represent the +variations of these magnitudes by functions which allow us to use +the power of mathematical analysis, it is most necessary to express +each magnitude by a definite number.</p> +<p>Under these conditions alone can a magnitude be considered as +effectively known. "I often say," Lord Kelvin has said, "that if +you can measure that of which you are speaking and express it by a +number you know something of your subject; but if you cannot +measure it nor express it by a number, your knowledge is of a sorry +kind and hardly satisfactory. It may be the beginning of the +acquaintance, but you are hardly, in your thoughts, advanced +towards science, whatever the subject may be."</p> +<p>It has now become possible to measure exactly the elements which +enter into nearly all physical phenomena, and these measurements +are taken with ever increasing precision. Every time a chapter in +science progresses, science shows itself more exacting; it perfects +its means of investigation, it demands more and more exactitude, +and one of the most striking features of modern physics is this +constant care for strictness and clearness in experimentation.</p> +<p>A veritable science of measurement has thus been constituted +which extends over all parts of the domain of physics. This science +has its rules and its methods; it points out the best processes of +calculation, and teaches the method of correctly estimating errors +and taking account of them. It has perfected the processes of +experiment, co-ordinated a large number of results, and made +possible the unification of standards. It is thanks to it that the +system of measurements unanimously adopted by physicists has been +formed.</p> +<p>At the present day we designate more peculiarly by the name of +metrology that part of the science of measurements which devotes +itself specially to the determining of the prototypes representing +the fundamental units of dimension and mass, and of the standards +of the first order which are derived from them. If all measurable +quantities, as was long thought possible, could be reduced to the +magnitudes of mechanics, metrology would thus be occupied with the +essential elements entering into all phenomena, and might +legitimately claim the highest rank in science. But even when we +suppose that some magnitudes can never be connected with mass, +length, and time, it still holds a preponderating place, and its +progress finds an echo throughout the whole domain of the natural +sciences. It is therefore well, in order to give an account of the +general progress of physics, to examine at the outset the +improvements which have been effected in these fundamental +measurements, and to see what precision these improvements have +allowed us to attain.</p> +<p><br /></p> +<p class="textbold">§ 2. THE MEASURE OF LENGTH</p> +<p>To measure a length is to compare it with another length taken +as unity. Measurement is therefore a relative operation, and can +only enable us to know ratios. Did both the length to be measured +and the unit chosen happen to vary simultaneously and in the same +degree, we should perceive no change. Moreover, the unit being, by +definition, the term of comparison, and not being itself comparable +with anything, we have theoretically no means of ascertaining +whether its length varies.</p> +<p>If, however, we were to note that, suddenly and in the same +proportions, the distance between two points on this earth had +increased, that all the planets had moved further from each other, +that all objects around us had become larger, that we ourselves had +become taller, and that the distance travelled by light in the +duration of a vibration had become greater, we should not hesitate +to think ourselves the victims of an illusion, that in reality all +these distances had remained fixed, and that all these appearances +were due to a shortening of the rule which we had used as the +standard for measuring the lengths.</p> +<p>From the mathematical point of view, it may be considered that +the two hypotheses are equivalent; all has lengthened around us, or +else our standard has become less. But it is no simple question of +convenience and simplicity which leads us to reject the one +supposition and to accept the other; it is right in this case to +listen to the voice of common sense, and those physicists who have +an instinctive trust in the notion of an absolute length are +perhaps not wrong. It is only by choosing our unit from those which +at all times have seemed to all men the most invariable, that we +are able in our experiments to note that the same causes acting +under identical conditions always produce the same effects. The +idea of absolute length is derived from the principle of causality; +and our choice is forced upon us by the necessity of obeying this +principle, which we cannot reject without declaring by that very +act all science to be impossible.</p> +<p>Similar remarks might be made with regard to the notions of +absolute time and absolute movement. They have been put in evidence +and set forth very forcibly by a learned and profound +mathematician, M. Painlevé.</p> +<p>On the particularly clear example of the measure of length, it +is interesting to follow the evolution of the methods employed, and +to run through the history of the progress in precision from the +time that we have possessed authentic documents relating to this +question. This history has been written in a masterly way by one of +the physicists who have in our days done the most by their personal +labours to add to it glorious pages. M. Benoit, the learned +Director of the International Bureau of Weights and Measures, has +furnished in various reports very complete details on the subject, +from which I here borrow the most interesting.</p> +<p>We know that in France the fundamental standard for measures of +length was for a long time the <i>Toise du Châtelet</i>, a +kind of callipers formed of a bar of iron which in 1668 was +embedded in the outside wall of the Châtelet, at the foot of +the staircase. This bar had at its extremities two projections with +square faces, and all the <i>toises</i> of commerce had to fit +exactly between them. Such a standard, roughly constructed, and +exposed to all the injuries of weather and time, offered very +slight guarantees either as to the permanence or the correctness of +its copies. Nothing, perhaps, can better convey an idea of the +importance of the modifications made in the methods of experimental +physics than the easy comparison between so rudimentary a process +and the actual measurements effected at the present time.</p> +<p>The <i>Toise du Châtelet</i>, notwithstanding its evident +faults, was employed for nearly a hundred years; in 1766 it was +replaced by the <i>Toise du Pérou</i>, so called because it +had served for the measurements of the terrestrial arc effected in +Peru from 1735 to 1739 by Bouguer, La Condamine, and Godin. At that +time, according to the comparisons made between this new +<i>toise</i> and the <i>Toise du Nord</i>, which had also been used +for the measurement of an arc of the meridian, an error of the +tenth part of a millimetre in measuring lengths of the order of a +metre was considered quite unimportant. At the end of the +eighteenth century, Delambre, in his work <i>Sur la Base du +Système métrique décimal</i>, clearly gives us +to understand that magnitudes of the order of the hundredth of a +millimetre appear to him incapable of observation, even in +scientific researches of the highest precision. At the present date +the International Bureau of Weights and Measures guarantees, in the +determination of a standard of length compared with the metre, an +approximation of two or three ten-thousandths of a millimetre, and +even a little more under certain circumstances.</p> +<p>This very remarkable progress is due to the improvements in the +method of comparison on the one hand, and in the manufacture of the +standard on the other. M. Benoit rightly points out that a kind of +competition has been set up between the standard destined to +represent the unit with its subdivisions and multiples and the +instrument charged with observing it, comparable, up to a certain +point, with that which in another order of ideas goes on between +the gun and the armour-plate.</p> +<p>The measuring instrument of to-day is an instrument of +comparison constructed with meticulous care, which enables us to do +away with causes of error formerly ignored, to eliminate the action +of external phenomena, and to withdraw the experiment from the +influence of even the personality of the observer. This standard is +no longer, as formerly, a flat rule, weak and fragile, but a rigid +bar, incapable of deformation, in which the material is utilised in +the best conditions of resistance. For a standard with ends has +been substituted a standard with marks, which permits much more +precise definition and can be employed in optical processes of +observation alone; that is, in processes which can produce in it no +deformation and no alteration. Moreover, the marks are traced on +the plane of the neutral fibres<a name="FNanchor_2_2" id= +"FNanchor_2_2"></a><a href="#Footnote_2_2" class="fnanchor">[2]</a> +exposed, and the invariability of their distance apart is thus +assured, even when a change is made in the way the rule is +supported.</p> +<p>Thanks to studies thus systematically pursued, we have succeeded +in the course of a hundred years in increasing the precision of +measures in the proportion of a thousand to one, and we may ask +ourselves whether such an increase will continue in the future. No +doubt progress will not be stayed; but if we keep to the definition +of length by a material standard, it would seem that its precision +cannot be considerably increased. We have nearly reached the limit +imposed by the necessity of making strokes of such a thickness as +to be observable under the microscope.</p> +<p>It may happen, however, that we shall be brought one of these +days to a new conception of the measure of length, and that very +different processes of determination will be thought of. If we took +as unit, for instance, the distance covered by a given radiation +during a vibration, the optical processes would at once admit of +much greater precision.</p> +<p>Thus Fizeau, the first to have this idea, says: "A ray of light, +with its series of undulations of extreme tenuity but perfect +regularity, may be considered as a micrometer of the greatest +perfection, and particularly suitable for determining length." But +in the present state of things, since the legal and customary +definition of the unit remains a material standard, it is not +enough to measure length in terms of wave-lengths, and we must also +know the value of these wave-lengths in terms of the standard +prototype of the metre.</p> +<p>This was determined in 1894 by M. Michelson and M. Benoit in an +experiment which will remain classic. The two physicists measured a +standard length of about ten centimetres, first in terms of the +wave-lengths of the red, green, and blue radiations of cadmium, and +then in terms of the standard metre. The great difficulty of the +experiment proceeds from the vast difference which exists between +the lengths to be compared, the wave-lengths barely amounting to +half a micron;<a name="FNanchor_3_3" id="FNanchor_3_3"></a> +<a href="#Footnote_3_3" class="fnanchor">[3]</a> the process +employed consisted in noting, instead of this length, a length +easily made about a thousand times greater, namely, the distance +between the fringes of interference.</p> +<p>In all measurement, that is to say in every determination of the +relation of a magnitude to the unit, there has to be determined on +the one hand the whole, and on the other the fractional part of +this ratio, and naturally the most delicate determination is +generally that of this fractional part. In optical processes the +difficulty is reversed. The fractional part is easily known, while +it is the high figure of the number representing the whole which +becomes a very serious obstacle. It is this obstacle which MM. +Michelson and Benoit overcame with admirable ingenuity. By making +use of a somewhat similar idea, M. Macé de Lépinay +and MM. Perot and Fabry, have lately effected by optical methods, +measurements of the greatest precision, and no doubt further +progress may still be made. A day may perhaps come when a material +standard will be given up, and it may perhaps even be recognised +that such a standard in time changes its length by molecular +strain, and by wear and tear: and it will be further noted that, in +accordance with certain theories which will be noticed later on, it +is not invariable when its orientation is changed.</p> +<p>For the moment, however, the need of any change in the +definition of the unit is in no way felt; we must, on the contrary, +hope that the use of the unit adopted by the physicists of the +whole world will spread more and more. It is right to remark that a +few errors still occur with regard to this unit, and that these +errors have been facilitated by incoherent legislation. France +herself, though she was the admirable initiator of the metrical +system, has for too long allowed a very regrettable confusion to +exist; and it cannot be noted without a certain sadness that it was +not until the <i>11th July 1903</i> that a law was promulgated +re-establishing the agreement between the legal and the scientific +definition of the metre.</p> +<p>Perhaps it may not be useless to briefly indicate here the +reasons of the disagreement which had taken place. Two definitions +of the metre can be, and in fact were given. One had for its basis +the dimensions of the earth, the other the length of the material +standard. In the minds of the founders of the metrical system, the +first of these was the true definition of the unit of length, the +second merely a simple representation. It was admitted, however, +that this representation had been constructed in a manner perfect +enough for it to be nearly impossible to perceive any difference +between the unit and its representation, and for the practical +identity of the two definitions to be thus assured. The creators of +the metrical system were persuaded that the measurements of the +meridian effected in their day could never be surpassed in +precision; and on the other hand, by borrowing from nature a +definite basis, they thought to take from the definition of the +unit some of its arbitrary character, and to ensure the means of +again finding the same unit if by any accident the standard became +altered. Their confidence in the value of the processes they had +seen employed was exaggerated, and their mistrust of the future +unjustified. This example shows how imprudent it is to endeavour to +fix limits to progress. It is an error to think the march of +science can be stayed; and in reality it is now known that the +ten-millionth part of the quarter of the terrestrial meridian is +longer than the metre by 0.187 millimetres. But contemporary +physicists do not fall into the same error as their forerunners, +and they regard the present result as merely provisional. They +guess, in fact, that new improvements will be effected in the art +of measurement; they know that geodesical processes, though much +improved in our days, have still much to do to attain the precision +displayed in the construction and determination of standards of the +first order; and consequently they do not propose to keep the +ancient definition, which would lead to having for unit a magnitude +possessing the grave defect from a practical point of view of being +constantly variable.</p> +<p>We may even consider that, looked at theoretically, its +permanence would not be assured. Nothing, in fact, proves that +sensible variations may not in time be produced in the value of an +arc of the meridian, and serious difficulties may arise regarding +the probable inequality of the various meridians.</p> +<p>For all these reasons, the idea of finding a natural unit has +been gradually abandoned, and we have become resigned to accepting +as a fundamental unit an arbitrary and conventional length having a +material representation recognised by universal consent; and it was +this unit which was consecrated by the following law of the 11th +July 1903:—</p> +<p>"The standard prototype of the metrical system is the +international metre, which has been sanctioned by the General +Conference on Weights and Measures."</p> +<p><br /></p> +<p class="textbold">§ 3. THE MEASURE OF MASS</p> +<p>On the subject of measures of mass, similar remarks to those on +measures of length might be made. The confusion here was perhaps +still greater, because, to the uncertainty relating to the fixing +of the unit, was added some indecision on the very nature of the +magnitude defined. In law, as in ordinary practice, the notions of +weight and of mass were not, in fact, separated with sufficient +clearness.</p> +<p>They represent, however, two essentially different things. Mass +is the characteristic of a quantity of matter; it depends neither +on the geographical position one occupies nor on the altitude to +which one may rise; it remains invariable so long as nothing +material is added or taken away. Weight is the action which gravity +has upon the body under consideration; this action does not depend +solely on the body, but on the earth as well; and when it is +changed from one spot to another, the weight changes, because +gravity varies with latitude and altitude.</p> +<p>These elementary notions, to-day understood even by young +beginners, appear to have been for a long time indistinctly +grasped. The distinction remained confused in many minds, because, +for the most part, masses were comparatively estimated by the +intermediary of weights. The estimations of weight made with the +balance utilize the action of the weight on the beam, but in such +conditions that the influence of the variations of gravity becomes +eliminated. The two weights which are being compared may both of +them change if the weighing is effected in different places, but +they are attracted in the same proportion. If once equal, they +remain equal even when in reality they may both have varied.</p> +<p>The current law defines the kilogramme as the standard of mass, +and the law is certainly in conformity with the rather obscurely +expressed intentions of the founders of the metrical system. Their +terminology was vague, but they certainly had in view the supply of +a standard for commercial transactions, and it is quite evident +that in barter what is important to the buyer as well as to the +seller is not the attraction the earth may exercise on the goods, +but the quantity that may be supplied for a given price. Besides, +the fact that the founders abstained from indicating any specified +spot in the definition of the kilogramme, when they were perfectly +acquainted with the considerable variations in the intensity of +gravity, leaves no doubt as to their real desire.</p> +<p>The same objections have been made to the definition of the +kilogramme, at first considered as the mass of a cubic decimetre of +water at 4° C., as to the first definition of the metre. We +must admire the incredible precision attained at the outset by the +physicists who made the initial determinations, but we know at the +present day that the kilogramme they constructed is slightly too +heavy (by about 1/25,000). Very remarkable researches have been +carried out with regard to this determination by the International +Bureau, and by MM. Macé de Lépinay and Buisson. The +law of the 11th July 1903 has definitely regularized the custom +which physicists had adopted some years before; and the standard of +mass, the legal prototype of the metrical system, is now the +international kilogramme sanctioned by the Conference of Weights +and Measures.</p> +<p>The comparison of a mass with the standard is effected with a +precision to which no other measurement can attain. Metrology +vouches for the hundredth of a milligramme in a kilogramme; that is +to say, that it estimates the hundred-millionth part of the +magnitude studied.</p> +<p>We may—as in the case of the lengths—ask ourselves +whether this already admirable precision can be surpassed; and +progress would seem likely to be slow, for difficulties singularly +increase when we get to such small quantities. But it is permitted +to hope that the physicists of the future will do still better than +those of to-day; and perhaps we may catch a glimpse of the time +when we shall begin to observe that the standard, which is +constructed from a heavy metal, namely, iridium-platinum, itself +obeys an apparently general law, and little by little loses some +particles of its mass by emanation.</p> +<p><br /></p> +<p class="textbold">§ 4. THE MEASURE OF TIME</p> +<p>The third fundamental magnitude of mechanics is time. There is, +so to speak, no physical phenomenon in which the notion of time +linked to the sequence of our states of consciousness does not play +a considerable part.</p> +<p>Ancestral habits and a very early tradition have led us to +preserve, as the unit of time, a unit connected with the earth's +movement; and the unit to-day adopted is, as we know, the +sexagesimal second of mean time. This magnitude, thus defined by +the conditions of a natural motion which may itself be modified, +does not seem to offer all the guarantees desirable from the point +of view of invariability. It is certain that all the friction +exercised on the earth—by the tides, for instance—must +slowly lengthen the duration of the day, and must influence the +movement of the earth round the sun. Such influence is certainly +very slight, but it nevertheless gives an unfortunately arbitrary +character to the unit adopted.</p> +<p>We might have taken as the standard of time the duration of +another natural phenomenon, which appears to be always reproduced +under identical conditions; the duration, for instance, of a given +luminous vibration. But the experimental difficulties of evaluation +with such a unit of the times which ordinarily have to be +considered, would be so great that such a reform in practice cannot +be hoped for. It should, moreover, be remarked that the duration of +a vibration may itself be influenced by external circumstances, +among which are the variations of the magnetic field in which its +source is placed. It could not, therefore, be strictly considered +as independent of the earth; and the theoretical advantage which +might be expected from this alteration would be somewhat +illusory.</p> +<p>Perhaps in the future recourse may be had to very different +phenomena. Thus Curie pointed out that if the air inside a glass +tube has been rendered radioactive by a solution of radium, the +tube may be sealed up, and it will then be noted that the radiation +of its walls diminishes with time, in accordance with an +exponential law. The constant of time derived by this phenomenon +remains the same whatever the nature and dimensions of the walls of +the tube or the temperature may be, and time might thus be denned +independently of all the other units.</p> +<p>We might also, as M. Lippmann has suggested in an extremely +ingenious way, decide to obtain measures of time which can be +considered as absolute because they are determined by parameters of +another nature than that of the magnitude to be measured. Such +experiments are made possible by the phenomena of gravitation. We +could employ, for instance, the pendulum by adopting, as the unit +of force, the force which renders the constant of gravitation equal +to unity. The unit of time thus defined would be independent of the +unit of length, and would depend only on the substance which would +give us the unit of mass under the unit of volume.</p> +<p>It would be equally possible to utilize electrical phenomena, +and one might devise experiments perfectly easy of execution. Thus, +by charging a condenser by means of a battery, and discharging it a +given number of times in a given interval of time, so that the +effect of the current of discharge should be the same as the effect +of the output of the battery through a given resistance, we could +estimate, by the measurement of the electrical magnitudes, the +duration of the interval noted. A system of this kind must not be +looked upon as a simple <i>jeu d'esprit</i>, since this very +practicable experiment would easily permit us to check, with a +precision which could be carried very far, the constancy of an +interval of time.</p> +<p>From the practical point of view, chronometry has made in these +last few years very sensible progress. The errors in the movements +of chronometers are corrected in a much more systematic way than +formerly, and certain inventions have enabled important +improvements to be effected in the construction of these +instruments. Thus the curious properties which steel combined with +nickel—so admirably studied by M.Ch.Ed. +Guillaume—exhibits in the matter of dilatation are now +utilized so as to almost completely annihilate the influence of +variations of temperature.</p> +<p><br /></p> +<p class="textbold">§ 5. THE MEASURE OF TEMPERATURE</p> +<p>From the three mechanical units we derive secondary units; as, +for instance, the unit of work or mechanical energy. The kinetic +theory takes temperature, as well as heat itself, to be a quantity +of energy, and thus seems to connect this notion with the +magnitudes of mechanics. But the legitimacy of this theory cannot +be admitted, and the calorific movement should also be a phenomenon +so strictly confined in space that our most delicate means of +investigation would not enable us to perceive it. It is better, +then, to continue to regard the unit of difference of temperature +as a distinct unit, to be added to the fundamental units.</p> +<p>To define the measure of a certain temperature, we take, in +practice, some arbitrary property of a body. The only necessary +condition of this property is, that it should constantly vary in +the same direction when the temperature rises, and that it should +possess, at any temperature, a well-marked value. We measure this +value by melting ice and by the vapour of boiling water under +normal pressure, and the successive hundredths of its variation, +beginning with the melting ice, defines the percentage. +Thermodynamics, however, has made it plain that we can set up a +thermometric scale without relying upon any determined property of +a real body. Such a scale has an absolute value independently of +the properties of matter. Now it happens that if we make use for +the estimation of temperatures, of the phenomena of dilatation +under a constant pressure, or of the increase of pressure in a +constant volume of a gaseous body, we obtain a scale very near the +absolute, which almost coincides with it when the gas possesses +certain qualities which make it nearly what is called a perfect +gas. This most lucky coincidence has decided the choice of the +convention adopted by physicists. They define normal temperature by +means of the variations of pressure in a mass of hydrogen beginning +with the initial pressure of a metre of mercury at 0° C.</p> +<p>M.P. Chappuis, in some very precise experiments conducted with +much method, has proved that at ordinary temperatures the +indications of such a thermometer are so close to the degrees of +the theoretical scale that it is almost impossible to ascertain the +value of the divergences, or even the direction that they take. The +divergence becomes, however, manifest when we work with extreme +temperatures. It results from the useful researches of M. Daniel +Berthelot that we must subtract +0.18° from the indications of +the hydrogen thermometer towards the temperature -240° C, and +add +0.05° to 1000° to equate them with the thermodynamic +scale. Of course, the difference would also become still more +noticeable on getting nearer to the absolute zero; for as hydrogen +gets more and more cooled, it gradually exhibits in a lesser degree +the characteristics of a perfect gas.</p> +<p>To study the lower regions which border on that kind of pole of +cold towards which are straining the efforts of the many physicists +who have of late years succeeded in getting a few degrees further +forward, we may turn to a gas still more difficult to liquefy than +hydrogen. Thus, thermometers have been made of helium; and from the +temperature of -260° C. downward the divergence of such a +thermometer from one of hydrogen is very marked.</p> +<p>The measurement of very high temperatures is not open to the +same theoretical objections as that of very low temperatures; but, +from a practical point of view, it is as difficult to effect with +an ordinary gas thermometer. It becomes impossible to guarantee the +reservoir remaining sufficiently impermeable, and all security +disappears, notwithstanding the use of recipients very superior to +those of former times, such as those lately devised by the +physicists of the <i>Reichansalt</i>. This difficulty is obviated +by using other methods, such as the employment of thermo-electric +couples, such as the very convenient couple of M. le Chatelier; but +the graduation of these instruments can only be effected at the +cost of a rather bold extrapolation.</p> +<p>M.D. Berthelot has pointed out and experimented with a very +interesting process, founded on the measurement by the phenomena of +interference of the refractive index of a column of air subjected +to the temperature it is desired to measure. It appears admissible +that even at the highest temperatures the variation of the power of +refraction is strictly proportional to that of the density, for +this proportion is exactly verified so long as it is possible to +check it precisely. We can thus, by a method which offers the great +advantage of being independent of the power and dimension of the +envelopes employed—since the length of the column of air +considered alone enters into the calculation—obtain results +equivalent to those given by the ordinary air thermometer.</p> +<p>Another method, very old in principle, has also lately acquired +great importance. For a long time we sought to estimate the +temperature of a body by studying its radiation, but we did not +know any positive relation between this radiation and the +temperature, and we had no good experimental method of estimation, +but had recourse to purely empirical formulas and the use of +apparatus of little precision. Now, however, many physicists, +continuing the classic researches of Kirchhoff, Boltzmann, +Professors Wien and Planck, and taking their starting-point from +the laws of thermodynamics, have given formulas which establish the +radiating power of a dark body as a function of the temperature and +the wave-length, or, better still, of the total power as a function +of the temperature and wave-length corresponding to the maximum +value of the power of radiation. We see, therefore, the possibility +of appealing for the measurement of temperature to a phenomenon +which is no longer the variation of the elastic force of a gas, and +yet is also connected with the principles of thermodynamics.</p> +<p>This is what Professors Lummer and Pringsheim have shown in a +series of studies which may certainly be reckoned among the +greatest experimental researches of the last few years. They have +constructed a radiator closely resembling the theoretically +integral radiator which a closed isothermal vessel would be, and +with only a very small opening, which allows us to collect from +outside the radiations which are in equilibrium with the interior. +This vessel is formed of a hollow carbon cylinder, heated by a +current of high intensity; the radiations are studied by means of a +bolometer, the disposition of which varies with the nature of the +experiments.</p> +<p>It is hardly possible to enter into the details of the method, +but the result sufficiently indicates its importance. It is now +possible, thanks to their researches, to estimate a temperature of +2000° C. to within about 5°. Ten years ago a similar +approximation could hardly have been arrived at for a temperature +of 1000° C.</p> +<p><br /></p> +<p class="textbold">§ 6. DERIVED UNITS AND THE MEASURE OF A +QUANTITY OF ENERGY</p> +<p>It must be understood that it is only by arbitrary convention +that a dependency is established between a derived unit and the +fundamental units. The laws of numbers in physics are often only +laws of proportion. We transform them into laws of equation, +because we introduce numerical coefficients and choose the units on +which they depend so as to simplify as much as possible the +formulas most in use. A particular speed, for instance, is in +reality nothing else but a speed, and it is only by the peculiar +choice of unit that we can say that it is the space covered during +the unit of time. In the same way, a quantity of electricity is a +quantity of electricity; and there is nothing to prove that, in its +essence, it is really reducible to a function of mass, of length, +and of time.</p> +<p>Persons are still to be met with who seem to have some illusions +on this point, and who see in the doctrine of the dimensions of the +units a doctrine of general physics, while it is, to say truth, +only a doctrine of metrology. The knowledge of dimensions is +valuable, since it allows us, for instance, to easily verify the +homogeneity of a formula, but it can in no way give us any +information on the actual nature of the quantity measured.</p> +<p>Magnitudes to which we attribute like dimensions may be +qualitatively irreducible one to the other. Thus the different +forms of energy are measured by the same unit, and yet it seems +that some of them, such as kinetic energy, really depend on time; +while for others, such as potential energy, the dependency +established by the system of measurement seems somewhat +fictitious.</p> +<p>The numerical value of a quantity of energy of any nature +should, in the system C.G.S., be expressed in terms of the unit +called the erg; but, as a matter of fact, when we wish to compare +and measure different quantities of energy of varying forms, such +as electrical, chemical, and other quantities, etc., we nearly +always employ a method by which all these energies are finally +transformed and used to heat the water of a calorimeter. It is +therefore very important to study well the calorific phenomenon +chosen as the unit of heat, and to determine with precision its +mechanical equivalent, that is to say, the number of ergs necessary +to produce this unit. This is a number which, on the principle of +equivalence, depends neither on the method employed, nor the time, +nor any other external circumstance.</p> +<p>As the result of the brilliant researches of Rowland and of Mr +Griffiths on the variations of the specific heat of water, +physicists have decided to take as calorific standard the quantity +of heat necessary to raise a gramme of water from 15° to +16° C., the temperature being measured by the scale of the +hydrogen thermometer of the International Bureau.</p> +<p>On the other hand, new determinations of the mechanical +equivalent, among which it is right to mention that of Mr. Ames, +and a full discussion as to the best results, have led to the +adoption of the number 4.187 to represent the number of ergs +capable of producing the unit of heat.</p> +<p>In practice, the measurement of a quantity of heat is very often +effected by means of the ice calorimeter, the use of which is +particularly simple and convenient. There is, therefore, a very +special interest in knowing exactly the melting-point of ice. M. +Leduc, who for several years has measured a great number of +physical constants with minute precautions and a remarkable sense +of precision, concludes, after a close discussion of the various +results obtained, that this heat is equal to 79.1 calories. An +error of almost a calorie had been committed by several renowned +experimenters, and it will be seen that in certain points the art +of measurement may still be largely perfected.</p> +<p>To the unit of energy might be immediately attached other units. +For instance, radiation being nothing but a flux of energy, we +could, in order to establish photometric units, divide the normal +spectrum into bands of a given width, and measure the power of each +for the unit of radiating surface.</p> +<p>But, notwithstanding some recent researches on this question, we +cannot yet consider the distribution of energy in the spectrum as +perfectly known. If we adopt the excellent habit which exists in +some researches of expressing radiating energy in ergs, it is still +customary to bring the radiations to a standard giving, by its +constitution alone, the unit of one particular radiation. In +particular, the definitions are still adhered to which were adopted +as the result of the researches of M. Violle on the radiation of +fused platinum at the temperature of solidification; and most +physicists utilize in the ordinary methods of photometry the +clearly defined notions of M. Blondel as to the luminous intensity +of flux, illumination (<i>éclairement</i>), light +(<i>éclat</i>), and lighting (<i>éclairage</i>), with +the corresponding units, decimal candle, <i>lumen</i>, <i>lux</i>, +carcel lamp, candle per square centimetre, and +<i>lumen</i>-hour.<a name="FNanchor_4_4" id="FNanchor_4_4"></a> +<a href="#Footnote_4_4" class="fnanchor">[4]</a></p> +<br /> +<p class="textbold">§ 7. MEASURE OF CERTAIN PHYSICAL +CONSTANTS</p> +<p>The progress of metrology has led, as a consequence, to +corresponding progress in nearly all physical measurements, and +particularly in the measure of natural constants. Among these, the +constant of gravitation occupies a position quite apart from the +importance and simplicity of the physical law which defines it, as +well as by its generality. Two material particles are mutually +attracted to each other by a force directly proportional to the +product of their mass, and inversely proportional to the square of +the distance between them. The coefficient of proportion is +determined when once the units are chosen, and as soon as we know +the numerical values of this force, of the two masses, and of their +distance. But when we wish to make laboratory experiments serious +difficulties appear, owing to the weakness of the attraction +between masses of ordinary dimensions. Microscopic forces, so to +speak, have to be observed, and therefore all the causes of errors +have to be avoided which would be unimportant in most other +physical researches. It is known that Cavendish was the first who +succeeded by means of the torsion balance in effecting fairly +precise measurements. This method has been again taken in hand by +different experimenters, and the most recent results are due to Mr +Vernon Boys. This learned physicist is also the author of a most +useful practical invention, and has succeeded in making quartz +threads as fine as can be desired and extremely uniform. He finds +that these threads possess valuable properties, such as perfect +elasticity and great tenacity. He has been able, with threads not +more than 1/500 of a millimetre in diameter, to measure with +precision couples of an order formerly considered outside the range +of experiment, and to reduce the dimensions of the apparatus of +Cavendish in the proportion of 150 to 1. The great advantage found +in the use of these small instruments is the better avoidance of +the perturbations arising from draughts of air, and of the very +serious influence of the slightest inequality in temperature.</p> +<p>Other methods have been employed in late years by other +experimenters, such as the method of Baron Eötvös, +founded on the use of a torsion lever, the method of the ordinary +balance, used especially by Professors Richarz and Krigar-Menzel +and also by Professor Poynting, and the method of M. Wilsing, who +uses a balance with a vertical beam. The results fairly agree, and +lead to attributing to the earth a density equal to 5.527.</p> +<p>The most familiar manifestation of gravitation is gravity. The +action of the earth on the unit of mass placed in one point, and +the intensity of gravity, is measured, as we know, by the aid of a +pendulum. The methods of measurement, whether by absolute or by +relative determinations, so greatly improved by Borda and Bessel, +have been still further improved by various geodesians, among whom +should be mentioned M. von Sterneek and General Defforges. Numerous +observations have been made in all parts of the world by various +explorers, and have led to a fairly complete knowledge of the +distribution of gravity over the surface of the globe. Thus we have +succeeded in making evident anomalies which would not easily find +their place in the formula of Clairaut.</p> +<p>Another constant, the determination of which is of the greatest +utility in astronomy of position, and the value of which enters +into electromagnetic theory, has to-day assumed, with the new ideas +on the constitution of matter, a still more considerable +importance. I refer to the speed of light, which appears to us, as +we shall see further on, the maximum value of speed which can be +given to a material body.</p> +<p>After the historical experiments of Fizeau and Foucault, taken +up afresh, as we know, partly by Cornu, and partly by Michelson and +Newcomb, it remained still possible to increase the precision of +the measurements. Professor Michelson has undertaken some new +researches by a method which is a combination of the principle of +the toothed wheel of Fizeau with the revolving mirror of Foucault. +The toothed wheel is here replaced, however, by a grating, in which +the lines and the spaces between them take the place of the teeth +and the gaps, the reflected light only being returned when it +strikes on the space between two lines. The illustrious American +physicist estimates that he can thus evaluate to nearly five +kilometres the path traversed by light in one second. This +approximation corresponds to a relative value of a few +hundred-thousandths, and it far exceeds those hitherto attained by +the best experimenters. When all the experiments are completed, +they will perhaps solve certain questions still in suspense; for +instance, the question whether the speed of propagation depends on +intensity. If this turns out to be the case, we should be brought +to the important conclusion that the amplitude of the oscillations, +which is certainly very small in relation to the already tiny +wave-lengths, cannot be considered as unimportant in regard to +these lengths. Such would seem to have been the result of the +curious experiments of M. Muller and of M. Ebert, but these results +have been recently disputed by M. Doubt.</p> +<p>In the case of sound vibrations, on the other hand, it should be +noted that experiment, consistently with the theory, proves that +the speed increases with the amplitude, or, if you will, with the +intensity. M. Violle has published an important series of +experiments on the speed of propagation of very condensed waves, on +the deformations of these waves, and on the relations of the speed +and the pressure, which verify in a remarkable manner the results +foreshadowed by the already old calculations of Riemann, repeated +later by Hugoniot. If, on the contrary, the amplitude is +sufficiently small, there exists a speed limit which is the same in +a large pipe and in free air. By some beautiful experiments, MM. +Violle and Vautier have clearly shown that any disturbance in the +air melts somewhat quickly into a single wave of given form, which +is propagated to a distance, while gradually becoming weaker and +showing a constant speed which differs little in dry air at 0° +C. from 331.36 metres per second. In a narrow pipe the influence of +the walls makes itself felt and produces various effects, in +particular a kind of dispersion in space of the harmonics of the +sound. This phenomenon, according to M. Brillouin, is perfectly +explicable by a theory similar to the theory of gratings.</p> +<hr style="width: 65%;" /> +<h3><a name="CHAPTER_III" id="CHAPTER_III"></a>CHAPTER III</h3> +<h2>PRINCIPLES</h2> +<p class="textbold">§ 1. THE PRINCIPLES OF PHYSICS</p> +<p>Facts conscientiously observed lead by induction to the +enunciation of a certain number of laws or general hypotheses which +are the principles already referred to. These principal hypotheses +are, in the eyes of a physicist, legitimate generalizations, the +consequences of which we shall be able at once to check by the +experiments from which they issue.</p> +<p>Among the principles almost universally adopted until lately +figure prominently those of mechanics—such as the principle +of relativity, and the principle of the equality of action and +reaction. We will not detail nor discuss them here, but later on we +shall have an opportunity of pointing out how recent theories on +the phenomena of electricity have shaken the confidence of +physicists in them and have led certain scholars to doubt their +absolute value.</p> +<p>The principle of Lavoisier, or principle of the conservation of +mass, presents itself under two different aspects according to +whether mass is looked upon as the coefficient of the inertia of +matter or as the factor which intervenes in the phenomena of +universal attraction, and particularly in gravitation. We shall see +when we treat of these theories, how we have been led to suppose +that inertia depended on velocity and even on direction. If this +conception were exact, the principle of the invariability of mass +would naturally be destroyed. Considered as a factor of attraction, +is mass really indestructible?</p> +<p>A few years ago such a question would have seemed singularly +audacious. And yet the law of Lavoisier is so far from self-evident +that for centuries it escaped the notice of physicists and +chemists. But its great apparent simplicity and its high character +of generality, when enunciated at the end of the eighteenth +century, rapidly gave it such an authority that no one was able to +any longer dispute it unless he desired the reputation of an oddity +inclined to paradoxical ideas.</p> +<p>It is important, however, to remark that, under fallacious +metaphysical appearances, we are in reality using empty words when +we repeat the aphorism, "Nothing can be lost, nothing can be +created," and deduce from it the indestructibility of matter. This +indestructibility, in truth, is an experimental fact, and the +principle depends on experiment. It may even seem, at first sight, +more singular than not that the weight of a bodily system in a +given place, or the quotient of this weight by that of the standard +mass—that is to say, the mass of these bodies—remains +invariable, both when the temperature changes and when chemical +reagents cause the original materials to disappear and to be +replaced by new ones. We may certainly consider that in a chemical +phenomenon annihilations and creations of matter are really +produced; but the experimental law teaches us that there is +compensation in certain respects.</p> +<p>The discovery of the radioactive bodies has, in some sort, +rendered popular the speculations of physicists on the phenomena of +the disaggregation of matter. We shall have to seek the exact +meaning which ought to be given to the experiments on the emanation +of these bodies, and to discover whether these experiments really +imperil the law of Lavoisier.</p> +<p>For some years different experimenters have also effected many +very precise measurements of the weight of divers bodies both +before and after chemical reactions between these bodies. Two +highly experienced and cautious physicists, Professors Landolt and +Heydweiller, have not hesitated to announce the sensational result +that in certain circumstances the weight is no longer the same +after as before the reaction. In particular, the weight of a +solution of salts of copper in water is not the exact sum of the +joint weights of the salt and the water. Such experiments are +evidently very delicate; they have been disputed, and they cannot +be considered as sufficient for conviction. It follows nevertheless +that it is no longer forbidden to regard the law of Lavoisier as +only an approximate law; according to Sandford and Ray, this +approximation would be about 1/2,400,000. This is also the result +reached by Professor Poynting in experiments regarding the possible +action of temperature on the weight of a body; and if this be +really so, we may reassure ourselves, and from the point of view of +practical application may continue to look upon matter as +indestructible.</p> +<p>The principles of physics, by imposing certain conditions on +phenomena, limit after a fashion the field of the possible. Among +these principles is one which, notwithstanding its importance when +compared with that of universally known principles, is less +familiar to some people. This is the principle of symmetry, more or +less conscious applications of which can, no doubt, be found in +various works and even in the conceptions of Copernican +astronomers, but which was generalized and clearly enunciated for +the first time by the late M. Curie. This illustrious physicist +pointed out the advantage of introducing into the study of physical +phenomena the considerations on symmetry familiar to +crystallographers; for a phenomenon to take place, it is necessary +that a certain dissymmetry should previously exist in the medium in +which this phenomenon occurs. A body, for instance, may be animated +with a certain linear velocity or a speed of rotation; it may be +compressed, or twisted; it may be placed in an electric or in a +magnetic field; it may be affected by an electric current or by one +of heat; it may be traversed by a ray of light either ordinary or +polarized rectilineally or circularly, etc.:—in each case a +certain minimum and characteristic dissymmetry is necessary at +every point of the body in question.</p> +<p>This consideration enables us to foresee that certain phenomena +which might be imagined <i>a priori</i> cannot exist. Thus, for +instance, it is impossible that an electric field, a magnitude +directed and not superposable on its image in a mirror +perpendicular to its direction, could be created at right angles to +the plane of symmetry of the medium; while it would be possible to +create a magnetic field under the same conditions.</p> +<p>This consideration thus leads us to the discovery of new +phenomena; but it must be understood that it cannot of itself give +us absolutely precise notions as to the nature of these phenomena, +nor disclose their order of magnitude.</p> +<p><br /></p> +<p class="textbold">§ 2. THE PRINCIPLE OF THE CONSERVATION OF +ENERGY</p> +<p>Dominating not physics alone, but nearly every other science, +the principle of the conservation of energy is justly considered as +the grandest conquest of contemporary thought. It shows us in a +powerful light the most diverse questions; it introduces order into +the most varied studies; it leads to a clear and coherent +interpretation of phenomena which, without it, appear to have no +connexion with each other; and it supplies precise and exact +numerical relations between the magnitudes which enter into these +phenomena.</p> +<p>The boldest minds have an instinctive confidence in it, and it +is the principle which has most stoutly resisted that assault which +the daring of a few theorists has lately directed to the overthrow +of the general principles of physics. At every new discovery, the +first thought of physicists is to find out how it accords with the +principle of the conservation of energy. The application of the +principle, moreover, never fails to give valuable hints on the new +phenomenon, and often even suggests a complementary discovery. Up +till now it seems never to have received a check, even the +extraordinary properties of radium not seriously contradicting it; +also the general form in which it is enunciated gives it such a +suppleness that it is no doubt very difficult to overthrow.</p> +<p>I do not claim to set forth here the complete history of this +principle, but I will endeavour to show with what pains it was +born, how it was kept back in its early days and then obstructed in +its development by the unfavourable conditions of the surroundings +in which it appeared. It first of all came, in fact, to oppose +itself to the reigning theories; but, little by little, it acted on +these theories, and they were modified under its pressure; then, in +their turn, these theories reacted on it and changed its primitive +form.</p> +<p>It had to be made less wide in order to fit into the classic +frame, and was absorbed by mechanics; and if it thus became less +general, it gained in precision what it lost in extent. When once +definitely admitted and classed, as it were, in the official domain +of science, it endeavoured to burst its bonds and return to a more +independent and larger life. The history of this principle is +similar to that of all evolutions.</p> +<p>It is well known that the conservation of energy was, at first, +regarded from the point of view of the reciprocal transformations +between heat and work, and that the principle received its first +clear enunciation in the particular case of the principle of +equivalence. It is, therefore, rightly considered that the scholars +who were the first to doubt the material nature of caloric were the +precursors of R. Mayer; their ideas, however, were the same as +those of the celebrated German doctor, for they sought especially +to demonstrate that heat was a mode of motion.</p> +<p>Without going back to early and isolated attempts like those of +Daniel Bernoulli, who, in his hydrodynamics, propounded the basis +of the kinetic theory of gases, or the researches of Boyle on +friction, we may recall, to show how it was propounded in former +times, a rather forgotten page of the <i>Mémoire sur la +Chaleur</i>, published in 1780 by Lavoisier and Laplace: "Other +physicists," they wrote, after setting out the theory of caloric, +"think that heat is nothing but the result of the insensible +vibrations of matter.... In the system we are now examining, heat +is the <i>vis viva</i> resulting from the insensible movements of +the molecules of a body; it is the sum of the products of the mass +of each molecule by the square of its velocity.... We shall not +decide between the two preceding hypotheses; several phenomena seem +to support the last mentioned—for instance, that of the heat +produced by the friction of two solid bodies. But there are others +which are more simply explained by the first, and perhaps they both +operate at once." Most of the physicists of that period, however, +did not share the prudent doubts of Lavoisier and Laplace. They +admitted, without hesitation, the first hypothesis; and, four years +after the appearance of the <i>Mémoire sur la Chaleur</i>, +Sigaud de Lafond, a professor of physics of great reputation, +wrote: "Pure Fire, free from all state of combination, seems to be +an assembly of particles of a simple, homogeneous, and absolutely +unalterable matter, and all the properties of this element indicate +that these particles are infinitely small and free, that they have +no sensible cohesion, and that they are moved in every possible +direction by a continual and rapid motion which is essential to +them.... The extreme tenacity and the surprising mobility of its +molecules are manifestly shown by the ease with which it penetrates +into the most compact bodies and by its tendency to put itself in +equilibrium throughout all bodies near to it."</p> +<p>It must be acknowledged, however, that the idea of Lavoisier and +Laplace was rather vague and even inexact on one important point. +They admitted it to be evident that "all variations of heat, +whether real or apparent, undergone by a bodily system when +changing its state, are produced in inverse order when the system +passes back to its original state." This phrase is the very denial +of equivalence where these changes of state are accompanied by +external work.</p> +<p>Laplace, moreover, himself became later a very convinced +partisan of the hypothesis of the material nature of caloric, and +his immense authority, so fortunate in other respects for the +development of science, was certainly in this case the cause of the +retardation of progress.</p> +<p>The names of Young, Rumford, Davy, are often quoted among those +physicists who, at the commencement of the nineteenth century, +caught sight of the new truths as to the nature of heat. To these +names is very properly added that of Sadi Carnot. A note found +among his papers unquestionably proves that, before 1830, ideas had +occurred to him from which it resulted that in producing work an +equivalent amount of heat was destroyed. But the year 1842 is +particularly memorable in the history of science as the year in +which Jules Robert Mayer succeeded, by an entirely personal effort, +in really enunciating the principle of the conservation of energy. +Chemists recall with just pride that the <i>Remarques sur les +forces de la nature animée</i>, contemptuously rejected by +all the journals of physics, were received and published in the +<i>Annalen</i> of Liebig. We ought never to forget this example, +which shows with what difficulty a new idea contrary to the classic +theories of the period succeeds in coming to the front; but +extenuating circumstances may be urged on behalf of the +physicists.</p> +<p>Robert Mayer had a rather insufficient mathematical education, +and his Memoirs, the <i>Remarques</i>, as well as the ulterior +publications, <i>Mémoire sur le mouvement organique et la +nutrition</i> and the <i>Matériaux pour la dynamique du +ciel</i>, contain, side by side with very profound ideas, evident +errors in mechanics. Thus it often happens that discoveries put +forward in a somewhat vague manner by adventurous minds not +overburdened by the heavy baggage of scientific erudition, who +audaciously press forward in advance of their time, fall into quite +intelligible oblivion until rediscovered, clarified, and put into +shape by slower but surer seekers. This was the case with the ideas +of Mayer. They were not understood at first sight, not only on +account of their originality, but also because they were couched in +incorrect language.</p> +<p>Mayer was, however, endowed with a singular strength of thought; +he expressed in a rather confused manner a principle which, for +him, had a generality greater than mechanics itself, and so his +discovery was in advance not only of his own time but of half the +century. He may justly be considered the founder of modern +energetics.</p> +<p>Freed from the obscurities which prevented its being clearly +perceived, his idea stands out to-day in all its imposing +simplicity. Yet it must be acknowledged that if it was somewhat +denaturalised by those who endeavoured to adapt it to the theories +of mechanics, and if it at first lost its sublime stamp of +generality, it thus became firmly fixed and consolidated on a more +stable basis.</p> +<p>The efforts of Helmholtz, Clausius, and Lord Kelvin to introduce +the principle of the conservation of energy into mechanics, were +far from useless. These illustrious physicists succeeded in giving +a more precise form to its numerous applications; and their +attempts thus contributed, by reaction, to give a fresh impulse to +mechanics, and allowed it to be linked to a more general order of +facts. If energetics has not been able to be included in mechanics, +it seems indeed that the attempt to include mechanics in energetics +was not in vain.</p> +<p>In the middle of the last century, the explanation of all +natural phenomena seemed more and more referable to the case of +central forces. Everywhere it was thought that reciprocal actions +between material points could be perceived, these points being +attracted or repelled by each other with an intensity depending +only on their distance or their mass. If, to a system thus +composed, the laws of the classical mechanics are applied, it is +shown that half the sum of the product of the masses by the square +of the velocities, to which is added the work which might be +accomplished by the forces to which the system would be subject if +it returned from its actual to its initial position, is a sum +constant in quantity.</p> +<p>This sum, which is the mechanical energy of the system, is +therefore an invariable quantity in all the states to which it may +be brought by the interaction of its various parts, and the word +energy well expresses a capital property of this quantity. For if +two systems are connected in such a way that any change produced in +the one necessarily brings about a change in the other, there can +be no variation in the characteristic quantity of the second except +so far as the characteristic quantity of the first itself +varies—on condition, of course, that the connexions are made +in such a manner as to introduce no new force. It will thus be seen +that this quantity well expresses the capacity possessed by a +system for modifying the state of a neighbouring system to which we +may suppose it connected.</p> +<p>Now this theorem of pure mechanics was found wanting every time +friction took place—that is to say, in all really observable +cases. The more perceptible the friction, the more considerable the +difference; but, in addition, a new phenomenon always appeared and +heat was produced. By experiments which are now classic, it became +established that the quantity of heat thus created independently of +the nature of the bodies is always (provided no other phenomena +intervene) proportional to the energy which has disappeared. +Reciprocally, also, heat may disappear, and we always find a +constant relation between the quantities of heat and work which +mutually replace each other.</p> +<p>It is quite clear that such experiments do not prove that heat +is work. We might just as well say that work is heat. It is making +a gratuitous hypothesis to admit this reduction of heat to +mechanism; but this hypothesis was so seductive, and so much in +conformity with the desire of nearly all physicists to arrive at +some sort of unity in nature, that they made it with eagerness and +became unreservedly convinced that heat was an active internal +force.</p> +<p>Their error was not in admitting this hypothesis; it was a +legitimate one since it has proved very fruitful. But some of them +committed the fault of forgetting that it was an hypothesis, and +considered it a demonstrated truth. Moreover, they were thus +brought to see in phenomena nothing but these two particular forms +of energy which in their minds were easily identified with each +other.</p> +<p>From the outset, however, it became manifest that the principle +is applicable to cases where heat plays only a parasitical part. +There were thus discovered, by translating the principle of +equivalence, numerical relations between the magnitudes of +electricity, for instance, and the magnitudes of mechanics. Heat +was a sort of variable intermediary convenient for calculation, but +introduced in a roundabout way and destined to disappear in the +final result.</p> +<p>Verdet, who, in lectures which have rightly remained celebrated, +defined with remarkable clearness the new theories, said, in 1862: +"Electrical phenomena are always accompanied by calorific +manifestations, of which the study belongs to the mechanical theory +of heat. This study, moreover, will not only have the effect of +making known to us interesting facts in electricity, but will throw +some light on the phenomena of electricity themselves."</p> +<p>The eminent professor was thus expressing the general opinion of +his contemporaries, but he certainly seemed to have felt in advance +that the new theory was about to penetrate more deeply into the +inmost nature of things. Three years previously, Rankine also had +put forth some very remarkable ideas the full meaning of which was +not at first well understood. He it was who comprehended the +utility of employing a more inclusive term, and invented the phrase +energetics. He also endeavoured to create a new doctrine of which +rational mechanics should be only a particular case; and he showed +that it was possible to abandon the ideas of atoms and central +forces, and to construct a more general system by substituting for +the ordinary consideration of forces that of the energy which +exists in all bodies, partly in an actual, partly in a potential +state.</p> +<p>By giving more precision to the conceptions of Rankine, the +physicists of the end of the nineteenth century were brought to +consider that in all physical phenomena there occur apparitions and +disappearances which are balanced by various energies. It is +natural, however, to suppose that these equivalent apparitions and +disappearances correspond to transformations and not to +simultaneous creations and destructions. We thus represent energy +to ourselves as taking different forms—mechanical, +electrical, calorific, and chemical—capable of changing one +into the other, but in such a way that the quantitative value +always remains the same. In like manner a bank draft may be +represented by notes, gold, silver, or bullion. The earliest known +form of energy, <i>i.e.</i> work, will serve as the standard as +gold serves as the monetary standard, and energy in all its forms +will be estimated by the corresponding work. In each particular +case we can strictly define and measure, by the correct application +of the principle of the conservation of energy, the quantity of +energy evolved under a given form.</p> +<p>We can thus arrange a machine comprising a body capable of +evolving this energy; then we can force all the organs of this +machine to complete an entirely closed cycle, with the exception of +the body itself, which, however, has to return to such a state that +all the variables from which this state depends resume their +initial values except the particular variable to which the +evolution of the energy under consideration is linked. The +difference between the work thus accomplished and that which would +have been obtained if this variable also had returned to its +original value, is the measure of the energy evolved.</p> +<p>In the same way that, in the minds of mechanicians, all forces +of whatever origin, which are capable of compounding with each +other and of balancing each other, belong to the same category of +beings, so for many physicists energy is a sort of entity which we +find under various aspects. There thus exists for them a world, +which comes in some way to superpose itself upon the world of +matter—that is to say, the world of energy, dominated in its +turn by a fundamental law similar to that of Lavoisier. <a name= +"FNanchor_5_5" id="FNanchor_5_5"></a><a href="#Footnote_5_5" class= +"fnanchor">[5]</a> This conception, as we have already seen, passes +the limit of experience; but others go further still. Absorbed in +the contemplation of this new world, they succeed in persuading +themselves that the old world of matter has no real existence and +that energy is sufficient by itself to give us a complete +comprehension of the Universe and of all the phenomena produced in +it. They point out that all our sensations correspond to changes of +energy, and that everything apparent to our senses is, in truth, +energy. The famous experiment of the blows with a stick by which it +was demonstrated to a sceptical philosopher that an outer world +existed, only proves, in reality, the existence of energy, and not +that of matter. The stick in itself is inoffensive, as Professor +Ostwald remarks, and it is its <i>vis viva</i>, its kinetic energy, +which is painful to us; while if we possessed a speed equal to its +own, moving in the same direction, it would no longer exist so far +as our sense of touch is concerned.</p> +<p>On this hypothesis, matter would only be the capacity for +kinetic energy, its pretended impenetrability energy of volume, and +its weight energy of position in the particular form which presents +itself in universal gravitation; nay, space itself would only be +known to us by the expenditure of energy necessary to penetrate it. +Thus in all physical phenomena we should only have to regard the +quantities of energy brought into play, and all the equations which +link the phenomena to one another would have no meaning but when +they apply to exchanges of energy. For energy alone can be common +to all phenomena.</p> +<p>This extreme manner of regarding things is seductive by its +originality, but appears somewhat insufficient if, after +enunciating generalities, we look more closely into the question. +From the philosophical point of view it may, moreover, seem +difficult not to conclude, from the qualities which reveal, if you +will, the varied forms of energy, that there exists a substance +possessing these qualities. This energy, which resides in one +region, and which transports itself from one spot to another, +forcibly brings to mind, whatever view we may take of it, the idea +of matter.</p> +<p>Helmholtz endeavoured to construct a mechanics based on the idea +of energy and its conservation, but he had to invoke a second law, +the principle of least action. If he thus succeeded in dispensing +with the hypothesis of atoms, and in showing that the new mechanics +gave us to understand the impossibility of certain movements which, +according to the old, ought to have been but never were +experimentally produced, he was only able to do so because the +principle of least action necessary for his theory became evident +in the case of those irreversible phenomena which alone really +exist in Nature. The energetists have thus not succeeded in forming +a thoroughly sound system, but their efforts have at all events +been partly successful. Most physicists are of their opinion, that +kinetic energy is only a particular variety of energy to which we +have no right to wish to connect all its other forms.</p> +<p>If these forms showed themselves to be innumerable throughout +the Universe, the principle of the conservation of energy would, in +fact, lose a great part of its importance. Every time that a +certain quantity of energy seemed to appear or disappear, it would +always be permissible to suppose that an equivalent quantity had +appeared or disappeared somewhere else under a new form; and thus +the principle would in a way vanish. But the known forms of energy +are fairly restricted in number, and the necessity of recognising +new ones seldom makes itself felt. We shall see, however, that to +explain, for instance, the paradoxical properties of radium and to +re-establish concord between these properties and the principle of +the conservation of energy, certain physicists have recourse to the +hypothesis that radium borrows an unknown energy from the medium in +which it is plunged. This hypothesis, however, is in no way +necessary; and in a few other rare cases in which similar +hypotheses have had to be set up, experiment has always in the long +run enabled us to discover some phenomenon which had escaped the +first observers and which corresponds exactly to the variation of +energy first made evident.</p> +<p>One difficulty, however, arises from the fact that the principle +ought only to be applied to an isolated system. Whether we imagine +actions at a distance or believe in intermediate media, we must +always recognise that there exist no bodies in the world incapable +of acting on each other, and we can never affirm that some +modification in the energy of a given place may not have its echo +in some unknown spot afar off. This difficulty may sometimes render +the value of the principle rather illusory.</p> +<p>Similarly, it behoves us not to receive without a certain +distrust the extension by certain philosophers to the whole +Universe, of a property demonstrated for those restricted systems +which observation can alone reach. We know nothing of the Universe +as a whole, and every generalization of this kind outruns in a +singular fashion the limit of experiment.</p> +<p>Even reduced to the most modest proportions, the principle of +the conservation of energy retains, nevertheless, a paramount +importance; and it still preserves, if you will, a high +philosophical value. M.J. Perrin justly points out that it gives us +a form under which we are experimentally able to grasp causality, +and that it teaches us that a result has to be purchased at the +cost of a determined effort.</p> +<p>We can, in fact, with M. Perrin and M. Langevin, represent this +in a way which puts this characteristic in evidence by enunciating +it as follows: "If at the cost of a change C we can obtain a change +K, there will never be acquired at the same cost, whatever the +mechanism employed, first the change K and in addition some other +change, unless this latter be one that is otherwise known to cost +nothing to produce or to destroy." If, for instance, the fall of a +weight can be accompanied, without anything else being produced, by +another transformation—the melting of a certain mass of ice, +for example—it will be impossible, no matter how you set +about it or whatever the mechanism used, to associate this same +transformation with the melting of another weight of ice.</p> +<p>We can thus, in the transformation in question, obtain an +appropriate number which will sum up that which may be expected +from the external effect, and can give, so to speak, the price at +which this transformation is bought, measure its invariable value +by a common measure (for instance, the melting of the ice), and, +without any ambiguity, define the energy lost during the +transformation as proportional to the mass of ice which can be +associated with it. This measure is, moreover, independent of the +particular phenomenon taken as the common measure.</p> +<p><br /></p> +<p class="textbold">§ 3. THE PRINCIPLE OF CARNOT AND +CLAUSIUS</p> +<p>The principle of Carnot, of a nature analogous to the principle +of the conservation of energy, has also a similar origin. It was +first enunciated, like the last named, although prior to it in +time, in consequence of considerations which deal only with heat +and mechanical work. Like it, too, it has evolved, grown, and +invaded the entire domain of physics. It may be interesting to +examine rapidly the various phases of this evolution. The origin of +the principle of Carnot is clearly determined, and it is very rare +to be able to go back thus certainly to the source of a discovery. +Sadi Carnot had, truth to say, no precursor. In his time heat +engines were not yet very common, and no one had reflected much on +their theory. He was doubtless the first to propound to himself +certain questions, and certainly the first to solve them.</p> +<p>It is known how, in 1824, in his <i>Réflexions sur la +puissance motrice du feu</i>, he endeavoured to prove that "the +motive power of heat is independent of the agents brought into play +for its realization," and that "its quantity is fixed solely by the +temperature of the bodies between which, in the last resort, the +transport of caloric is effected"—at least in all engines in +which "the method of developing the motive power attains the +perfection of which it is capable"; and this is, almost textually, +one of the enunciations of the principle at the present day. Carnot +perceived very clearly the great fact that, to produce work by +heat, it is necessary to have at one's disposal a fall of +temperature. On this point he expresses himself with perfect +clearness: "The motive power of a fall of water depends on its +height and on the quantity of liquid; the motive power of heat +depends also on the quantity of caloric employed, and on what might +be called—in fact, what we shall call—the height of +fall, that is to say, the difference in temperature of the bodies +between which the exchange of caloric takes place."</p> +<p>Starting with this idea, he endeavours to demonstrate, by +associating two engines capable of working in a reversible cycle, +that the principle is founded on the impossibility of perpetual +motion.</p> +<p>His memoir, now celebrated, did not produce any great sensation, +and it had almost fallen into deep oblivion, which, in consequence +of the discovery of the principle of equivalence, might have seemed +perfectly justified. Written, in fact, on the hypothesis of the +indestructibility of caloric, it was to be expected that this +memoir should be condemned in the name of the new doctrine, that +is, of the principle recently brought to light.</p> +<p>It was really making a new discovery to establish that Carnot's +fundamental idea survived the destruction of the hypothesis on the +nature of heat, on which he seemed to rely. As he no doubt himself +perceived, his idea was quite independent of this hypothesis, +since, as we have seen, he was led to surmise that heat could +disappear; but his demonstrations needed to be recast and, in some +points, modified.</p> +<p>It is to Clausius that was reserved the credit of rediscovering +the principle, and of enunciating it in language conformable to the +new doctrines, while giving it a much greater generality. The +postulate arrived at by experimental induction, and which must be +admitted without demonstration, is, according to Clausius, that in +a series of transformations in which the final is identical with +the initial stage, it is impossible for heat to pass from a colder +to a warmer body unless some other accessory phenomenon occurs at +the same time.</p> +<p>Still more correctly, perhaps, an enunciation can be given of +the postulate which, in the main, is analogous, by saying: A heat +motor, which after a series of transformations returns to its +initial state, can only furnish work if there exist at least two +sources of heat, and if a certain quantity of heat is given to one +of the sources, which can never be the hotter of the two. By the +expression "source of heat," we mean a body exterior to the system +and capable of furnishing or withdrawing heat from it.</p> +<p>Starting with this principle, we arrive, as does Clausius, at +the demonstration that the output of a reversible machine working +between two given temperatures is greater than that of any +non-reversible engine, and that it is the same for all reversible +machines working between these two temperatures.</p> +<p>This is the very proposition of Carnot; but the proposition thus +stated, while very useful for the theory of engines, does not yet +present any very general interest. Clausius, however, drew from it +much more important consequences. First, he showed that the +principle conduces to the definition of an absolute scale of +temperature; and then he was brought face to face with a new notion +which allows a strong light to be thrown on the questions of +physical equilibrium. I refer to entropy.</p> +<p>It is still rather difficult to strip entirely this very +important notion of all analytical adornment. Many physicists +hesitate to utilize it, and even look upon it with some distrust, +because they see in it a purely mathematical function without any +definite physical meaning. Perhaps they are here unduly severe, +since they often admit too easily the objective existence of +quantities which they cannot define. Thus, for instance, it is +usual almost every day to speak of the heat possessed by a body. +Yet no body in reality possesses a definite quantity of heat even +relatively to any initial state; since starting from this point of +departure, the quantities of heat it may have gained or lost vary +with the road taken and even with the means employed to follow it. +These expressions of heat gained or lost are, moreover, themselves +evidently incorrect, for heat can no longer be considered as a sort +of fluid passing from one body to another.</p> +<p>The real reason which makes entropy somewhat mysterious is that +this magnitude does not fall directly under the ken of any of our +senses; but it possesses the true characteristic of a concrete +physical magnitude, since it is, in principle at least, measurable. +Various authors of thermodynamical researches, amongst whom M. +Mouret should be particularly mentioned, have endeavoured to place +this characteristic in evidence.</p> +<p>Consider an isothermal transformation. Instead of leaving the +heat abandoned by the body subjected to the +transformation—water condensing in a state of saturated +vapour, for instance—to pass directly into an ice +calorimeter, we can transmit this heat to the calorimeter by the +intermediary of a reversible Carnot engine. The engine having +absorbed this quantity of heat, will only give back to the ice a +lesser quantity of heat; and the weight of the melted ice, inferior +to that which might have been directly given back, will serve as a +measure of the isothermal transformation thus effected. It can be +easily shown that this measure is independent of the apparatus +used. It consequently becomes a numerical element characteristic of +the body considered, and is called its entropy. Entropy, thus +defined, is a variable which, like pressure or volume, might serve +concurrently with another variable, such as pressure or volume, to +define the state of a body.</p> +<p>It must be perfectly understood that this variable can change in +an independent manner, and that it is, for instance, distinct from +the change of temperature. It is also distinct from the change +which consists in losses or gains of heat. In chemical reactions, +for example, the entropy increases without the substances borrowing +any heat. When a perfect gas dilates in a vacuum its entropy +increases, and yet the temperature does not change, and the gas has +neither been able to give nor receive heat. We thus come to +conceive that a physical phenomenon cannot be considered known to +us if the variation of entropy is not given, as are the variations +of temperature and of pressure or the exchanges of heat. The change +of entropy is, properly speaking, the most characteristic fact of a +thermal change.</p> +<p>It is important, however, to remark that if we can thus easily +define and measure the difference of entropy between two states of +the same body, the value found depends on the state arbitrarily +chosen as the zero point of entropy; but this is not a very serious +difficulty, and is analogous to that which occurs in the evaluation +of other physical magnitudes—temperature, potential, etc.</p> +<p>A graver difficulty proceeds from its not being possible to +define a difference, or an equality, of entropy between two bodies +chemically different. We are unable, in fact, to pass by any means, +reversible or not, from one to the other, so long as the +transmutation of matter is regarded as impossible; but it is well +understood that it is nevertheless possible to compare the +variations of entropy to which these two bodies are both of them +individually subject.</p> +<p>Neither must we conceal from ourselves that the definition +supposes, for a given body, the possibility of passing from one +state to another by a reversible transformation. Reversibility is +an ideal and extreme case which cannot be realized, but which can +be approximately attained in many circumstances. So with gases and +with perfectly elastic bodies, we effect sensibly reversible +transformations, and changes of physical state are practically +reversible. The discoveries of Sainte-Claire Deville have brought +many chemical phenomena into a similar category, and reactions such +as solution, which used to be formerly the type of an irreversible +phenomenon, may now often be effected by sensibly reversible means. +Be that as it may, when once the definition is admitted, we arrive, +by taking as a basis the principles set forth at the inception, at +the demonstration of the celebrated theorem of Clausius: <i>The +entropy of a thermally isolated system continues to increase +incessantly.</i></p> +<p>It is very evident that the theorem can only be worth applying +in cases where the entropy can be exactly defined; but, even when +thus limited, the field still remains vast, and the harvest which +we can there reap is very abundant.</p> +<p>Entropy appears, then, as a magnitude measuring in a certain way +the evolution of a system, or, at least, as giving the direction of +this evolution. This very important consequence certainly did not +escape Clausius, since the very name of entropy, which he chose to +designate this magnitude, itself signifies evolution. We have +succeeded in defining this entropy by demonstrating, as has been +said, a certain number of propositions which spring from the +postulate of Clausius; it is, therefore, natural to suppose that +this postulate itself contains <i>in potentia</i> the very idea of +a necessary evolution of physical systems. But as it was first +enunciated, it contains it in a deeply hidden way.</p> +<p>No doubt we should make the principle of Carnot appear in an +interesting light by endeavouring to disengage this fundamental +idea, and by placing it, as it were, in large letters. Just as, in +elementary geometry, we can replace the postulate of Euclid by +other equivalent propositions, so the postulate of thermodynamics +is not necessarily fixed, and it is instructive to try to give it +the most general and suggestive character.</p> +<p>MM. Perrin and Langevin have made a successful attempt in this +direction. M. Perrin enunciates the following principle: <i>An +isolated system never passes twice through the same state</i>. In +this form, the principle affirms that there exists a necessary +order in the succession of two phenomena; that evolution takes +place in a determined direction. If you prefer it, it may be thus +stated: <i>Of two converse transformations unaccompanied by any +external effect, one only is possible</i>. For instance, two gases +may diffuse themselves one in the other in constant volume, but +they could not conversely separate themselves spontaneously.</p> +<p>Starting from the principle thus put forward, we make the +logical deduction that one cannot hope to construct an engine which +should work for an indefinite time by heating a hot source and by +cooling a cold one. We thus come again into the route traced by +Clausius, and from this point we may follow it strictly.</p> +<p>Whatever the point of view adopted, whether we regard the +proposition of M. Perrin as the corollary of another experimental +postulate, or whether we consider it as a truth which we admit <i>a +priori</i> and verify through its consequences, we are led to +consider that in its entirety the principle of Carnot resolves +itself into the idea that we cannot go back along the course of +life, and that the evolution of a system must follow its necessary +progress.</p> +<p>Clausius and Lord Kelvin have drawn from these considerations +certain well-known consequences on the evolution of the Universe. +Noticing that entropy is a property added to matter, they admit +that there is in the world a total amount of entropy; and as all +real changes which are produced in any system correspond to an +increase of entropy, it may be said that the entropy of the world +is continually increasing. Thus the quantity of energy existing in +the Universe remains constant, but transforms itself little by +little into heat uniformly distributed at a temperature everywhere +identical. In the end, therefore, there will be neither chemical +phenomena nor manifestation of life; the world will still exist, +but without motion, and, so to speak, dead.</p> +<p>These consequences must be admitted to be very doubtful; we +cannot in any certain way apply to the Universe, which is not a +finite system, a proposition demonstrated, and that not +unreservedly, in the sharply limited case of a finite system. +Herbert Spencer, moreover, in his book on <i>First Principles</i>, +brings out with much force the idea that, even if the Universe came +to an end, nothing would allow us to conclude that, once at rest, +it would remain so indefinitely. We may recognise that the state in +which we are began at the end of a former evolutionary period, and +that the end of the existing era will mark the beginning of a new +one.</p> +<p>Like an elastic and mobile object which, thrown into the air, +attains by degrees the summit of its course, then possesses a zero +velocity and is for a moment in equilibrium, and then falls on +touching the ground to rebound, so the world should be subjected to +huge oscillations which first bring it to a maximum of entropy till +the moment when there should be produced a slow evolution in the +contrary direction bringing it back to the state from which it +started. Thus, in the infinity of time, the life of the Universe +proceeds without real stop.</p> +<p>This conception is, moreover, in accordance with the view +certain physicists take of the principle of Carnot. We shall see, +for example, that in the kinetic theory we are led to admit that, +after waiting sufficiently long, we can witness the return of the +various states through which a mass of gas, for example, has passed +in its series of transformations.</p> +<p>If we keep to the present era, evolution has a fixed +direction—that which leads to an increase of entropy; and it +is possible to enquire, in any given system to what physical +manifestations this increase corresponds. We note that kinetic, +potential, electrical, and chemical forms of energy have a great +tendency to transform themselves into calorific energy. A chemical +reaction, for example, gives out energy; but if the reaction is not +produced under very special conditions, this energy immediately +passes into the calorific form. This is so true, that chemists +currently speak of the heat given out by reactions instead of +regarding the energy disengaged in general.</p> +<p>In all these transformations the calorific energy obtained has +not, from a practical point of view, the same value at which it +started. One cannot, in fact, according to the principle of Carnot, +transform it integrally into mechanical energy, since the heat +possessed by a body can only yield work on condition that a part of +it falls on a body with a lower temperature. Thus appears the idea +that energies which exchange with each other and correspond to +equal quantities have not the same qualitative value. Form has its +importance, and there are persons who prefer a golden louis to four +pieces of five francs. The principle of Carnot would thus lead us +to consider a certain classification of energies, and would show us +that, in the transformations possible, these energies always tend +to a sort of diminution of quality—that is, to a +<i>degradation</i>.</p> +<p>It would thus reintroduce an element of differentiation of which +it seems very difficult to give a mechanical explanation. Certain +philosophers and physicists see in this fact a reason which +condemns <i>a priori</i> all attempts made to give a mechanical +explanation of the principle of Carnot.</p> +<p>It is right, however, not to exaggerate the importance that +should be attributed to the phrase degraded energy. If the heat is +not equivalent to the work, if heat at 99° is not equivalent to +heat at 100°, that means that we cannot in practice construct +an engine which shall transform all this heat into work, or that, +for the same cold source, the output is greater when the +temperature of the hot source is higher; but if it were possible +that this cold source had itself the temperature of absolute zero, +the whole heat would reappear in the form of work. The case here +considered is an ideal and extreme case, and we naturally cannot +realize it; but this consideration suffices to make it plain that +the classification of energies is a little arbitrary and depends +more, perhaps, on the conditions in which mankind lives than on the +inmost nature of things.</p> +<p>In fact, the attempts which have often been made to refer the +principle of Carnot to mechanics have not given convincing results. +It has nearly always been necessary to introduce into the attempt +some new hypothesis independent of the fundamental hypotheses of +ordinary mechanics, and equivalent, in reality, to one of the +postulates on which the ordinary exposition of the second law of +thermodynamics is founded. Helmholtz, in a justly celebrated +theory, endeavoured to fit the principle of Carnot into the +principle of least action; but the difficulties regarding the +mechanical interpretation of the irreversibility of physical +phenomena remain entire. Looking at the question, however, from the +point of view at which the partisans of the kinetic theories of +matter place themselves, the principle is viewed in a new aspect. +Gibbs and afterwards Boltzmann and Professor Planck have put +forward some very interesting ideas on this subject. By following +the route they have traced, we come to consider the principle as +pointing out to us that a given system tends towards the +configuration presented by the maximum probability, and, +numerically, the entropy would even be the logarithm of this +probability. Thus two different gaseous masses, enclosed in two +separate receptacles which have just been placed in communication, +diffuse themselves one through the other, and it is highly +improbable that, in their mutual shocks, both kinds of molecules +should take a distribution of velocities which reduce them by a +spontaneous phenomenon to the initial state.</p> +<p>We should have to wait a very long time for so extraordinary a +concourse of circumstances, but, in strictness, it would not be +impossible. The principle would only be a law of probability. Yet +this probability is all the greater the more considerable is the +number of molecules itself. In the phenomena habitually dealt with, +this number is such that, practically, the variation of entropy in +a constant sense takes, so to speak, the character of absolute +certainty.</p> +<p>But there may be exceptional cases where the complexity of the +system becomes insufficient for the application of the principle of +Carnot;—as in the case of the curious movements of small +particles suspended in a liquid which are known by the name of +Brownian movements and can be observed under the microscope. The +agitation here really seems, as M. Gouy has remarked, to be +produced and continued indefinitely, regardless of any difference +in temperature; and we seem to witness the incessant motion, in an +isothermal medium, of the particles which constitute matter. +Perhaps, however, we find ourselves already in conditions where the +too great simplicity of the distribution of the molecules deprives +the principle of its value.</p> +<p>M. Lippmann has in the same way shown that, on the kinetic +hypothesis, it is possible to construct such mechanisms that we can +so take cognizance of molecular movements that <i>vis viva</i> can +be taken from them. The mechanisms of M. Lippmann are not, like the +celebrated apparatus at one time devised by Maxwell, purely +hypothetical. They do not suppose a partition with a hole +impossible to be bored through matter where the molecular spaces +would be larger than the hole itself. They have finite dimensions. +Thus M. Lippmann considers a vase full of oxygen at a constant +temperature. In the interior of this vase is placed a small copper +ring, and the whole is set in a magnetic field. The oxygen +molecules are, as we know, magnetic, and when passing through the +interior of the ring they produce in this ring an induced current. +During this time, it is true, other molecules emerge from the space +enclosed by the circuit; but the two effects do not counterbalance +each other, and the resulting current is maintained. There is +elevation of temperature in the circuit in accordance with Joule's +law; and this phenomenon, under such conditions, is incompatible +with the principle of Carnot.</p> +<p>It is possible—and that, I think, is M. Lippmann's +idea—to draw from his very ingenious criticism an objection +to the kinetic theory, if we admit the absolute value of the +principle; but we may also suppose that here again we are in +presence of a system where the prescribed conditions diminish the +complexity and render it, consequently, less probable that the +evolution is always effected in the same direction.</p> +<p>In whatever way you look at it, the principle of Carnot +furnishes, in the immense majority of cases, a very sure guide in +which physicists continue to have the most entire confidence.</p> +<p><br /></p> +<p class="textbold">§ 4. THERMODYNAMICS</p> +<p>To apply the two fundamental principles of thermodynamics, +various methods may be employed, equivalent in the main, but +presenting as the cases vary a greater or less convenience.</p> +<p>In recording, with the aid of the two quantities, energy and +entropy, the relations which translate analytically the two +principles, we obtain two relations between the coefficients which +occur in a given phenomenon; but it may be easier and also more +suggestive to employ various functions of these quantities. In a +memoir, of which some extracts appeared as early as 1869, a modest +scholar, M. Massieu, indicated in particular a remarkable function +which he termed a characteristic function, and by the employment of +which calculations are simplified in certain cases.</p> +<p>In the same way J.W. Gibbs, in 1875 and 1878, then Helmholtz in +1882, and, in France, M. Duhem, from the year 1886 onward, have +published works, at first ill understood, of which the renown was, +however, considerable in the sequel, and in which they made use of +analogous functions under the names of available energy, free +energy, or internal thermodynamic potential. The magnitude thus +designated, attaching, as a consequence of the two principles, to +all states of the system, is perfectly determined when the +temperature and other normal variables are known. It allows us, by +calculations often very easy, to fix the conditions necessary and +sufficient for the maintenance of the system in equilibrium by +foreign bodies taken at the same temperature as itself.</p> +<p>One may hope to constitute in this way, as M. Duhem in a long +and remarkable series of operations has specially endeavoured to +do, a sort of general mechanics which will enable questions of +statics to be treated with accuracy, and all the conditions of +equilibrium of the system, including the calorific properties, to +be determined. Thus, ordinary statics teaches us that a liquid with +its vapour on the top forms a system in equilibrium, if we apply to +the two fluids a pressure depending on temperature alone. +Thermodynamics will furnish us, in addition, with the expression of +the heat of vaporization and of, the specific heats of the two +saturated fluids.</p> +<p>This new study has given us also most valuable information on +compressible fluids and on the theory of elastic equilibrium. Added +to certain hypotheses on electric or magnetic phenomena, it gives a +coherent whole from which can be deduced the conditions of electric +or magnetic equilibrium; and it illuminates with a brilliant light +the calorific laws of electrolytic phenomena.</p> +<p>But the most indisputable triumph of this thermodynamic statics +is the discovery of the laws which regulate the changes of physical +state or of chemical constitution. J.W. Gibbs was the author of +this immense progress. His memoir, now celebrated, on "the +equilibrium of heterogeneous substances," concealed in 1876 in a +review at that time of limited circulation, and rather heavy to +read, seemed only to contain algebraic theorems applicable with +difficulty to reality. It is known that Helmholtz independently +succeeded, a few years later, in introducing thermodynamics into +the domain of chemistry by his conception of the division of energy +into free and into bound energy: the first, capable of undergoing +all transformations, and particularly of transforming itself into +external action; the second, on the other hand, bound, and only +manifesting itself by giving out heat. When we measure chemical +energy, we ordinarily let it fall wholly into the calorific form; +but, in reality, it itself includes both parts, and it is the +variation of the free energy and not that of the total energy +measured by the integral disengagement of heat, the sign of which +determines the direction in which the reactions are effected.</p> +<p>But if the principle thus enunciated by Helmholtz as a +consequence of the laws of thermodynamics is at bottom identical +with that discovered by Gibbs, it is more difficult of application +and is presented under a more mysterious aspect. It was not until +M. Van der Waals exhumed the memoir of Gibbs, when numerous +physicists or chemists, most of them Dutch—Professor Van +t'Hoff, Bakhius Roozeboom, and others—utilized the rules set +forth in this memoir for the discussion of the most complicated +chemical reactions, that the extent of the new laws was fully +understood.</p> +<p>The chief rule of Gibbs is the one so celebrated at the present +day under the name of the Phase Law. We know that by phases are +designated the homogeneous substances into which a system is +divided; thus carbonate of lime, lime, and carbonic acid gas are +the three phases of a system which comprises Iceland spar partially +dissociated into lime and carbonic acid gas. The number of phases +added to the number of independent components—that is to say, +bodies whose mass is left arbitrary by the chemical formulas of the +substances entering into the reaction—fixes the general form +of the law of equilibrium of the system; that is to say, the number +of quantities which, by their variations (temperature and +pressure), would be of a nature to modify its equilibrium by +modifying the constitution of the phases.</p> +<p>Several authors, M. Raveau in particular, have indeed given very +simple demonstrations of this law which are not based on +thermodynamics; but thermodynamics, which led to its discovery, +continues to give it its true scope. Moreover, it would not suffice +merely to determine quantitatively those laws of which it makes +known the general form. We must, if we wish to penetrate deeper +into details, particularize the hypothesis, and admit, for +instance, with Gibbs that we are dealing with perfect gases; while, +thanks to thermodynamics, we can constitute a complete theory of +dissociation which leads to formulas in complete accord with the +numerical results of the experiment. We can thus follow closely all +questions concerning the displacements of the equilibrium, and find +a relation of the first importance between the masses of the bodies +which react in order to constitute a system in equilibrium.</p> +<p>The statics thus constructed constitutes at the present day an +important edifice to be henceforth classed amongst historical +monuments. Some theorists even wish to go a step beyond. They have +attempted to begin by the same means a more complete study of those +systems whose state changes from one moment to another. This is, +moreover, a study which is necessary to complete satisfactorily the +study of equilibrium itself; for without it grave doubts would +exist as to the conditions of stability, and it alone can give +their true meaning to questions relating to displacements of +equilibrium.</p> +<p>The problems with which we are thus confronted are singularly +difficult. M. Duhem has given us many excellent examples of the +fecundity of the method; but if thermodynamic statics may be +considered definitely founded, it cannot be said that the general +dynamics of systems, considered as the study of thermal movements +and variations, are yet as solidly established.</p> +<p><br /></p> +<p class="textbold">§ 5. ATOMISM</p> +<p>It may appear singularly paradoxical that, in a chapter devoted +to general views on the principles of physics, a few words should +be introduced on the atomic theories of matter.</p> +<p>Very often, in fact, what is called the physics of principles is +set in opposition to the hypotheses on the constitution of matter, +particularly to atomic theories. I have already said that, +abandoning the investigation of the unfathomable mystery of the +constitution of the Universe, some physicists think they may find, +in certain general principles, sufficient guides to conduct them +across the physical world. But I have also said, in examining the +history of those principles, that if they are to-day considered +experimental truths, independent of all theories relating to +matter, they have, in fact, nearly all been discovered by scholars +who relied on molecular hypotheses: and the question suggests +itself whether this is mere chance, or whether this chance may not +be ordained by higher reasons.</p> +<p>In a very profound work which appeared a few years ago, entitled +<i>Essai critique sur l'hypothese des atomes</i>, M. Hannequin, a +philosopher who is also an erudite scholar, examined the part taken +by atomism in the history of science. He notes that atomism and +science were born, in Greece, of the same problem, and that in +modern times the revival of the one was closely connected with that +of the other. He shows, too, by very close analysis, that the +atomic hypothesis is essential to the optics of Fresnel and of +Cauchy; that it penetrates into the study of heat; and that, in its +general features, it presided at the birth of modern chemistry and +is linked with all its progress. He concludes that it is, in a +manner, the soul of our knowledge of Nature, and that contemporary +theories are on this point in accord with history: for these +theories consecrate the preponderance of this hypothesis in the +domain of science.</p> +<p>If M. Hannequin had not been prematurely cut off in the full +expansion of his vigorous talent, he might have added another +chapter to his excellent book. He would have witnessed a prodigious +budding of atomistic ideas, accompanied, it is true, by wide +modifications in the manner in which the atom is to be regarded, +since the most recent theories make material atoms into centres +constituted of atoms of electricity. On the other hand, he would +have found in the bursting forth of these new doctrines one more +proof in support of his idea that science is indissolubly bound to +atomism.</p> +<p>From the philosophical point of view, M. Hannequin, examining +the reasons which may have called these links into being, arrives +at the idea that they necessarily proceed from the constitution of +our knowledge, or, perhaps, from that of Nature itself. Moreover, +this origin, double in appearance, is single at bottom. Our minds +could not, in fact, detach and come out of themselves to grasp +reality and the absolute in Nature. According to the idea of +Descartes, it is the destiny of our minds only to take hold of and +to understand that which proceeds from them.</p> +<p>Thus atomism, which is, perhaps, only an appearance containing +even some contradictions, is yet a well-founded appearance, since +it conforms to the laws of our minds; and this hypothesis is, in a +way, necessary.</p> +<p>We may dispute the conclusions of M. Hannequin, but no one will +refuse to recognise, as he does, that atomic theories occupy a +preponderating part in the doctrines of physics; and the position +which they have thus conquered gives them, in a way, the right of +saying that they rest on a real principle. It is in order to +recognise this right that several physicists—M. Langevin, for +example—ask that atoms be promoted from the rank of +hypotheses to that of principles. By this they mean that the +atomistic ideas forced upon us by an almost obligatory induction +based on very exact experiments, enable us to co-ordinate a +considerable amount of facts, to construct a very general +synthesis, and to foresee a great number of phenomena.</p> +<p>It is of moment, moreover, to thoroughly understand that atomism +does not necessarily set up the hypothesis of centres of attraction +acting at a distance, and it must not be confused with molecular +physics, which has, on the other hand, undergone very serious +checks. The molecular physics greatly in favour some fifty years +ago leads to such complex representations and to solutions often so +undetermined, that the most courageous are wearied with upholding +it and it has fallen into some discredit. It rested on the +fundamental principles of mechanics applied to molecular actions; +and that was, no doubt, an extension legitimate enough, since +mechanics is itself only an experimental science, and its +principles, established for the movements of matter taken as a +whole, should not be applied outside the domain which belongs to +them. Atomism, in fact, tends more and more, in modern theories, to +imitate the principle of the conservation of energy or that of +entropy, to disengage itself from the artificial bonds which +attached it to mechanics, and to put itself forward as an +independent principle.</p> +<p>Atomistic ideas also have undergone evolution, and this slow +evolution has been considerably quickened under the influence of +modern discoveries. These reach back to the most remote antiquity, +and to follow their development we should have to write the history +of human thought which they have always accompanied since the time +of Leucippus, Democritus, Epicurus, and Lucretius. The first +observers who noticed that the volume of a body could be diminished +by compression or cold, or augmented by heat, and who saw a soluble +solid body mix completely with the water which dissolved it, must +have been compelled to suppose that matter was not dispersed +continuously throughout the space it seemed to occupy. They were +thus brought to consider it discontinuous, and to admit that a +substance having the same composition and the same properties in +all its parts—in a word, perfectly homogeneous—ceases +to present this homogeneity when considered within a sufficiently +small volume.</p> +<p>Modern experimenters have succeeded by direct experiments in +placing in evidence this heterogeneous character of matter when +taken in small mass. Thus, for example, the superficial tension, +which is constant for the same liquid at a given temperature, no +longer has the same value when the thickness of the layer of liquid +becomes extremely small. Newton noticed even in his time that a +dark zone is seen to form on a soap bubble at the moment when it +becomes so thin that it must burst. Professor Reinold and Sir +Arthur Rücker have shown that this zone is no longer exactly +spherical; and from this we must conclude that the superficial +tension, constant for all thicknesses above a certain limit, +commences to vary when the thickness falls below a critical value, +which these authors estimate, on optical grounds, at about fifty +millionths of a millimetre.</p> +<p>From experiments on capillarity, Prof. Quincke has obtained +similar results with regard to layers of solids. But it is not only +capillary properties which allow this characteristic to be +revealed. All the properties of a body are modified when taken in +small mass; M. Meslin proves this in a very ingenious way as +regards optical properties, and Mr Vincent in respect of electric +conductivity. M. Houllevigue, who, in a chapter of his excellent +work, <i>Du Laboratoire à l'Usine</i>, has very clearly set +forth the most interesting considerations on atomic hypotheses, has +recently demonstrated that copper and silver cease to combine with +iodine as soon as they are present in a thickness of less than +thirty millionths of a millimetre. It is this same dimension +likewise that is possessed, according to M. Wiener, by the smallest +thicknesses it is possible to deposit on glass. These layers are so +thin that they cannot be perceived, but their presence is revealed +by a change in the properties of the light reflected by them.</p> +<p>Thus, below fifty to thirty millionths of a millimetre the +properties of matter depend on its thickness. There are then, no +doubt, only a few molecules to be met with, and it may be +concluded, in consequence, that the discontinuous elements of +bodies—that is, the molecules—have linear dimensions of +the order of magnitude of the millionth of a millimetre. +Considerations regarding more complex phenomena, for instance the +phenomena of electricity by contact, and also the kinetic theory of +gases, bring us to the same conclusion.</p> +<p>The idea of the discontinuity of matter forces itself upon us +for many other reasons. All modern chemistry is founded on this +principle; and laws like the law of multiple proportions, introduce +an evident discontinuity to which we find analogies in the law of +electrolysis. The elements of bodies we are thus brought to regard +might, as regards solids at all events, be considered as immobile; +but this immobility could not explain the phenomena of heat, and, +as it is entirely inadmissible for gases, it seems very improbable +it can absolutely occur in any state. We are thus led to suppose +that these elements are animated by very complicated movements, +each one proceeding in closed trajectories in which the least +variations of temperature or pressure cause modifications.</p> +<p>The atomistic hypothesis shows itself remarkably fecund in the +study of phenomena produced in gases, and here the mutual +independence of the particles renders the question relatively more +simple and, perhaps, allows the principles of mechanics to be more +certainly extended to the movements of molecules.</p> +<p>The kinetic theory of gases can point to unquestioned successes; +and the idea of Daniel Bernouilli, who, as early as 1738, +considered a gaseous mass to be formed of a considerable number of +molecules animated by rapid movements of translation, has been put +into a form precise enough for mathematical analysis, and we have +thus found ourselves in a position to construct a really solid +foundation. It will be at once conceived, on this hypothesis, that +pressure is the resultant of the shocks of the molecules against +the walls of the containing vessel, and we at once come to the +demonstration that the law of Mariotte is a natural consequence of +this origin of pressure; since, if the volume occupied by a certain +number of molecules is doubled, the number of shocks per second on +each square centimetre of the walls becomes half as much. But if we +attempt to carry this further, we find ourselves in presence of a +serious difficulty. It is impossible to mentally follow every one +of the many individual molecules which compose even a very limited +mass of gas. The path followed by this molecule may be every +instant modified by the chance of running against another, or by a +shock which may make it rebound in another direction.</p> +<p>The difficulty would be insoluble if chance had not laws of its +own. It was Maxwell who first thought of introducing into the +kinetic theory the calculation of probabilities. Willard Gibbs and +Boltzmann later on developed this idea, and have founded a +statistical method which does not, perhaps, give absolute +certainty, but which is certainly most interesting and curious. +Molecules are grouped in such a way that those belonging to the +same group may be considered as having the same state of movement; +then an examination is made of the number of molecules in each +group, and what are the changes in this number from one moment to +another. It is thus often possible to determine the part which the +different groups have in the total properties of the system and in +the phenomena which may occur.</p> +<p>Such a method, analogous to the one employed by statisticians +for following the social phenomena in a population, is all the more +legitimate the greater the number of individuals counted in the +averages; now, the number of molecules contained in a limited +space—for example, in a centimetre cube taken in normal +conditions—is such that no population could ever attain so +high a figure. All considerations, those we have indicated as well +as others which might be invoked (for example, the recent +researches of M. Spring on the limit of visibility of +fluorescence), give this result:—that there are, in this +space, some twenty thousand millions of molecules. Each of these +must receive in the space of a millimetre about ten thousand +shocks, and be ten thousand times thrust out of its course. The +free path of a molecule is then very small, but it can be +singularly augmented by diminishing the number of them. Tait and +Dewar have calculated that, in a good modern vacuum, the length of +the free path of the remaining molecules not taken away by the +air-pump easily reaches a few centimetres.</p> +<p>By developing this theory, we come to consider that, for a given +temperature, every molecule (and even every individual particle, +atom, or ion) which takes part in the movement has, on the average, +the same kinetic energy in every body, and that this energy is +proportional to the absolute temperature; so that it is represented +by this temperature multiplied by a constant quantity which is a +universal constant.</p> +<p>This result is not an hypothesis but a very great probability. +This probability increases when it is noted that the same value for +the constant is met with in the study of very varied phenomena; for +example, in certain theories on radiation. Knowing the mass and +energy of a molecule, it is easy to calculate its speed; and we +find that the average speed is about 400 metres per second for +carbonic anhydride, 500 for nitrogen, and 1850 for hydrogen at +0° C. and at ordinary pressure. I shall have occasion, later +on, to speak of much more considerable speeds than these as +animating other particles.</p> +<p>The kinetic theory has permitted the diffusion of gases to be +explained, and the divers circumstances of the phenomenon to be +calculated. It has allowed us to show, as M. Brillouin has done, +that the coefficient of diffusion of two gases does not depend on +the proportion of the gases in the mixture; it gives a very +striking image of the phenomena of viscosity and conductivity; and +it leads us to think that the coefficients of friction and of +conductivity are independent of the density; while all these +previsions have been verified by experiment. It has also invaded +optics; and by relying on the principle of Doppler, Professor +Michelson has succeeded in obtaining from it an explanation of the +length presented by the spectral rays of even the most rarefied +gases.</p> +<p>But however interesting are these results, they would not have +sufficed to overcome the repugnance of certain physicists for +speculations which, an imposing mathematical baggage +notwithstanding, seemed to them too hypothetical. The theory, +moreover, stopped at the molecule, and appeared to suggest no idea +which could lead to the discovery of the key to the phenomena where +molecules exercise a mutual influence on each other. The kinetic +hypothesis, therefore, remained in some disfavour with a great +number of persons, particularly in France, until the last few +years, when all the recent discoveries of the conductivity of gases +and of the new radiations came to procure for it a new and +luxuriant efflorescence. It may be said that the atomistic +synthesis, but yesterday so decried, is to-day triumphant.</p> +<p>The elements which enter into the earlier kinetic theory, and +which, to avoid confusion, should be always designated by the name +of molecules, were not, truth to say, in the eyes of the chemists, +the final term of the divisibility of matter. It is well known +that, to them, except in certain particular bodies like the vapour +of mercury and argon, the molecule comprises several atoms, and +that, in compound bodies, the number of these atoms may even be +fairly considerable. But physicists rarely needed to have recourse +to the consideration of these atoms. They spoke of them to explain +certain particularities of the propagation of sound, and to +enunciate laws relating to specific heats; but, in general, they +stopped at the consideration of the molecule.</p> +<p>The present theories carry the division much further. I shall +not dwell now on these theories, since, in order to thoroughly +understand them, many other facts must be examined. But to avoid +all confusion, it remains understood that, contrary, no doubt, to +etymology, but in conformity with present custom, I shall continue +in what follows to call atoms those particles of matter which have +till now been spoken of; these atoms being themselves, according to +modern views, singularly complex edifices formed of elements, of +which we shall have occasion to indicate the nature later.</p> +<hr style="width: 65%;" /> +<h3><a name="CHAPTER_IV" id="CHAPTER_IV"></a>CHAPTER IV</h3> +<h2>THE VARIOUS STATES OF MATTER</h2> +<p class="textbold">§ 1. THE STATICS OF FLUIDS</p> +<p>The division of bodies into gaseous, liquid, and solid, and the +distinction established for the same substance between the three +states, retain a great importance for the applications and usages +of daily life, but have long since lost their absolute value from +the scientific point of view.</p> +<p>So far as concerns the liquid and gaseous states particularly, +the already antiquated researches of Andrews confirmed the ideas of +Cagniard de la Tour and established the continuity of the two +states. A group of physical studies has thus been constituted on +what may be called the statics of fluids, in which we examine the +relations existing between the pressure, the volume, and the +temperature of bodies, and in which are comprised, under the term +fluid, gases as well as liquids.</p> +<p>These researches deserve attention by their interest and the +generality of the results to which they have led. They also give a +remarkable example of the happy effects which may be obtained by +the combined employment of the various methods of investigation +used in exploring the domain of nature. Thermodynamics has, in +fact, allowed us to obtain numerical relations between the various +coefficients, and atomic hypotheses have led to the establishment +of one capital relation, the characteristic equation of fluids; +while, on the other hand, experiment in which the progress made in +the art of measurement has been utilized, has furnished the most +valuable information on all the laws of compressibility and +dilatation.</p> +<p>The classical work of Andrews was not very wide. Andrews did not +go much beyond pressures close to the normal and ordinary +temperatures. Of late years several very interesting and peculiar +cases have been examined by MM. Cailletet, Mathias, Batelli, Leduc, +P. Chappuis, and other physicists. Sir W. Ramsay and Mr S. Young +have made known the isothermal diagrams<a name="FNanchor_6_6" id= +"FNanchor_6_6"></a><a href="#Footnote_6_6" class="fnanchor">[6]</a> +of a certain number of liquid bodies at the ordinary temperature. +They have thus been able, while keeping to somewhat restricted +limits of temperature and pressure, to touch upon the most +important questions, since they found themselves in the region of +the saturation curve and of the critical point.</p> +<p>But the most complete and systematic body of researches is due +to M. Amagat, who undertook the study of a certain number of +bodies, some liquid and some gaseous, extending the scope of his +experiments so as to embrace the different phases of the phenomena +and to compare together, not only the results relating to the same +bodies, but also those concerning different bodies which happen to +be in the same conditions of temperature and pressure, but in very +different conditions as regards their critical points.</p> +<p>From the experimental point of view, M. Amagat has been able, +with extreme skill, to conquer the most serious difficulties. He +has managed to measure with precision pressures amounting to 3000 +atmospheres, and also the very small volumes then occupied by the +fluid mass under consideration. This last measurement, which +necessitates numerous corrections, is the most delicate part of the +operation. These researches have dealt with a certain number of +different bodies. Those relating to carbonic acid and ethylene take +in the critical point. Others, on hydrogen and nitrogen, for +instance, are very extended. Others, again, such as the study of +the compressibility of water, have a special interest, on account +of the peculiar properties of this substance. M. Amagat, by a very +concise discussion of the experiments, has also been able to +definitely establish the laws of compressibility and dilatation of +fluids under constant pressure, and to determine the value of the +various coefficients as well as their variations. It ought to be +possible to condense all these results into a single formula +representing the volume, the temperature, and the pressure. Rankin +and, subsequently, Recknagel, and then Hirn, formerly proposed +formulas of that kind; but the most famous, the one which first +appeared to contain in a satisfactory manner all the facts which +experiments brought to light and led to the production of many +others, was the celebrated equation of Van der Waals.</p> +<p>Professor Van der Waals arrived at this relation by relying upon +considerations derived from the kinetic theory of gases. If we keep +to the simple idea at the bottom of this theory, we at once +demonstrate that the gas ought to obey the laws of Mariotte and of +Gay-Lussac, so that the characteristic equation would be obtained +by the statement that the product of the number which is the +measure of the volume by that which is the measure of the pressure +is equal to a constant coefficient multiplied by the degree of the +absolute temperature. But to get at this result we neglect two +important factors.</p> +<p>We do not take into account, in fact, the attraction which the +molecules must exercise on each other. Now, this attraction, which +is never absolutely non-existent, may become considerable when the +molecules are drawn closer together; that is to say, when the +compressed gaseous mass occupies a more and more restricted volume. +On the other hand, we assimilate the molecules, as a first +approximation, to material points without dimensions; in the +evaluation of the path traversed by each molecule no notice is +taken of the fact that, at the moment of the shock, their centres +of gravity are still separated by a distance equal to twice the +radius of the molecule.</p> +<p>M. Van der Waals has sought out the modifications which must be +introduced into the simple characteristic equation to bring it +nearer to reality. He extends to the case of gases the +considerations by which Laplace, in his famous theory of +capillarity, reduced the effect of the molecular attraction to a +perpendicular pressure exercised on the surface of a liquid. This +leads him to add to the external pressure, that due to the +reciprocal attractions of the gaseous particles. On the other hand, +when we attribute finite dimensions to these particles, we must +give a higher value to the number of shocks produced in a given +time, since the effect of these dimensions is to diminish the mean +path they traverse in the time which elapses between two +consecutive shocks.</p> +<p>The calculation thus pursued leads to our adding to the pressure +in the simple equation a term which is designated the internal +pressure, and which is the quotient of a constant by the square of +the volume; also to our deducting from the volume a constant which +is the quadruple of the total and invariable volume which the +gaseous molecules would occupy did they touch one another.</p> +<p>The experiments fit in fairly well with the formula of Van der +Waals, but considerable discrepancies occur when we extend its +limits, particularly when the pressures throughout a rather wider +interval are considered; so that other and rather more complex +formulas, on which there is no advantage in dwelling, have been +proposed, and, in certain cases, better represent the facts.</p> +<p>But the most remarkable result of M. Van der Waals' calculations +is the discovery of corresponding states. For a long time +physicists spoke of bodies taken in a comparable state. Dalton, for +example, pointed out that liquids have vapour-pressures equal to +the temperatures equally distant from their boiling-point; but that +if, in this particular property, liquids were comparable under +these conditions of temperature, as regards other properties the +parallelism was no longer to be verified. No general rule was found +until M. Van der Waals first enunciated a primary law, viz., that +if the pressure, the volume, and the temperature are estimated by +taking as units the critical quantities, the constants special to +each body disappear in the characteristic equation, which thus +becomes the same for all fluids.</p> +<p>The words corresponding states thus take a perfectly precise +signification. Corresponding states are those for which the +numerical values of the pressure, volume, and temperature, +expressed by taking as units the values corresponding to the +critical point, are equal; and, in corresponding states any two +fluids have exactly the same properties.</p> +<p>M. Natanson, and subsequently P. Curie and M. Meslin, have shown +by various considerations that the same result may be arrived at by +choosing units which correspond to any corresponding states; it has +also been shown that the theorem of corresponding states in no way +implies the exactitude of Van der Waals' formula. In reality, this +is simply due to the fact that the characteristic equation only +contains three constants.</p> +<p>The philosophical importance and the practical interest of the +discovery nevertheless remain considerable. As was to be expected, +numbers of experimenters have sought whether these consequences are +duly verified in reality. M. Amagat, particularly, has made use for +this purpose of a most original and simple method. He remarks that, +in all its generality, the law may be translated thus: If the +isothermal diagrams of two substances be drawn to the same scale, +taking as unit of volume and of pressure the values of the critical +constants, the two diagrams should coincide; that is to say, their +superposition should present the aspect of one diagram appertaining +to a single substance. Further, if we possess the diagrams of two +bodies drawn to any scales and referable to any units whatever, as +the changes of units mean changes in the scale of the axes, we +ought to make one of the diagrams similar to the other by +lengthening or shortening it in the direction of one of the axes. +M. Amagat then photographs two isothermal diagrams, leaving one +fixed, but arranging the other so that it may be free to turn round +each axis of the co-ordinates; and by projecting, by means of a +magic lantern, the second on the first, he arrives in certain cases +at an almost complete coincidence.</p> +<p>This mechanical means of proof thus dispenses with laborious +calculations, but its sensibility is unequally distributed over the +different regions of the diagram. M. Raveau has pointed out an +equally simple way of verifying the law, by remarking that if the +logarithms of the pressure and volume are taken as co-ordinates, +the co-ordinates of two corresponding points differ by two constant +quantities, and the corresponding curves are identical.</p> +<p>From these comparisons, and from other important researches, +among which should be particularly mentioned those of Mr S. Young +and M. Mathias, it results that the laws of corresponding states +have not, unfortunately, the degree of generality which we at first +attributed to them, but that they are satisfactory when applied to +certain groups of bodies.<a name="FNanchor_7_7" id= +"FNanchor_7_7"></a><a href="#Footnote_7_7" class= +"fnanchor">[7]</a></p> +<p>If in the study of the statics of a simple fluid the +experimental results are already complex, we ought to expect much +greater difficulties when we come to deal with mixtures; still the +problem has been approached, and many points are already cleared +up.</p> +<p>Mixed fluids may first of all be regarded as composed of a large +number of invariable particles. In this particularly simple case M. +Van der Waals has established a characteristic equation of the +mixtures which is founded on mechanical considerations. Various +verifications of this formula have been effected, and it has, in +particular, been the object of very important remarks by M. Daniel +Berthelot.</p> +<p>It is interesting to note that thermodynamics seems powerless to +determine this equation, for it does not trouble itself about the +nature of the bodies obedient to its laws; but, on the other hand, +it intervenes to determine the properties of coexisting phases. If +we examine the conditions of equilibrium of a mixture which is not +subjected to external forces, it will be demonstrated that the +distribution must come back to a juxtaposition of homogeneous +phases; in a given volume, matter ought so to arrange itself that +the total sum of free energy has a minimum value. Thus, in order to +elucidate all questions relating to the number and qualities of the +phases into which the substance divides itself, we are led to +regard the geometrical surface which for a given temperature +represents the free energy.</p> +<p>I am unable to enter here into the detail of the questions +connected with the theories of Gibbs, which have been the object of +numerous theoretical studies, and also of a series, ever more and +more abundant, of experimental researches. M. Duhem, in particular, +has published, on the subject, memoirs of the highest importance, +and a great number of experimenters, mostly scholars working in the +physical laboratory of Leyden under the guidance of the Director, +Mr Kamerlingh Onnes, have endeavoured to verify the anticipations +of the theory.</p> +<p>We are a little less advanced as regards abnormal substances; +that is to say, those composed of molecules, partly simple and +partly complex, and either dissociated or associated. These cases +must naturally be governed by very complex laws. Recent researches +by MM. Van der Waals, Alexeif, Rothmund, Künen, Lehfeld, etc., +throw, however, some light on the question.</p> +<p>The daily more numerous applications of the laws of +corresponding states have rendered highly important the +determination of the critical constants which permit these states +to be defined. In the case of homogeneous bodies the critical +elements have a simple, clear, and precise sense; the critical +temperature is that of the single isothermal line which presents a +point of inflexion at a horizontal tangent; the critical pressure +and the critical volume are the two co-ordinates of this point of +inflexion.</p> +<p>The three critical constants may be determined, as Mr S. Young +and M. Amagat have shown, by a direct method based on the +consideration of the saturated states. Results, perhaps more +precise, may also be obtained if one keeps to two constants or even +to a single one—temperature, for example—by employing +various special methods. Many others, MM. Cailletet and Colardeau, +M. Young, M.J. Chappuis, etc., have proceeded thus.</p> +<p>The case of mixtures is much more complicated. A binary mixture +has a critical space instead of a critical point. This space is +comprised between two extreme temperatures, the lower corresponding +to what is called the folding point, the higher to that which we +call the point of contact of the mixture. Between these two +temperatures an isothermal compression yields a quantity of liquid +which increases, then reaches a maximum, diminishes, and +disappears. This is the phenomenon of retrograde condensation. We +may say that the properties of the critical point of a homogeneous +substance are, in a way, divided, when it is a question of a binary +mixture, between the two points mentioned.</p> +<p>Calculation has enabled M. Van der Waals, by the application of +his kinetic theories, and M. Duhem, by means of thermodynamics, to +foresee most of the results which have since been verified by +experiment. All these facts have been admirably set forth and +systematically co-ordinated by M. Mathias, who, by his own +researches, moreover, has made contributions of the highest value +to the study of questions regarding the continuity of the liquid +and gaseous states.</p> +<p>The further knowledge of critical elements has allowed the laws +of corresponding states to be more closely examined in the case of +homogeneous substances. It has shown that, as I have already said, +bodies must be arranged in groups, and this fact clearly proves +that the properties of a given fluid are not determined by its +critical constants alone, and that it is necessary to add to them +some other specific parameters; M. Mathias and M. D. Berthelot have +indicated some which seem to play a considerable part.</p> +<p>It results also from this that the characteristic equation of a +fluid cannot yet be considered perfectly known. Neither the +equation of Van der Waals nor the more complicated formulas which +have been proposed by various authors are in perfect conformity +with reality. We may think that researches of this kind will only +be successful if attention is concentrated, not only on the +phenomena of compressibility and dilatation, but also on the +calorimetric properties of bodies. Thermodynamics indeed +establishes relations between those properties and other constants, +but does not allow everything to be foreseen.</p> +<p>Several physicists have effected very interesting calorimetric +measurements, either, like M. Perot, in order to verify Clapeyron's +formula regarding the heat of vaporization, or to ascertain the +values of specific heats and their variations when the temperature +or the pressure happens to change. M. Mathias has even succeeded in +completely determining the specific heats of liquefied gases and of +their saturated vapours, as well as the heat of internal and +external vaporization.</p> +<p><br /></p> +<p class="textbold">§ 2. THE LIQUEFACTION OF GASES, AND THE +PROPERTIES OF BODIES AT A LOW TEMPERATURE</p> +<p>The scientific advantages of all these researches have been +great, and, as nearly always happens, the practical consequences +derived from them have also been most important. It is owing to the +more complete knowledge of the general properties of fluids that +immense progress has been made these last few years in the methods +of liquefying gases.</p> +<p>From a theoretical point of view the new processes of +liquefaction can be classed in two categories. Linde's machine and +those resembling it utilize, as is known, expansion without any +notable production of external work. This expansion, nevertheless, +causes a fall in the temperature, because the gas in the experiment +is not a perfect gas, and, by an ingenious process, the +refrigerations produced are made cumulative.</p> +<p>Several physicists have proposed to employ a method whereby +liquefaction should be obtained by expansion with recuperable +external work. This method, proposed as long ago as 1860 by +Siemens, would offer considerable advantages. Theoretically, the +liquefaction would be more rapid, and obtained much more +economically; but unfortunately in the experiment serious obstacles +are met with, especially from the difficulty of obtaining a +suitable lubricant under intense cold for those parts of the +machine which have to be in movement if the apparatus is to +work.</p> +<p>M. Claude has recently made great progress on this point by the +use, during the running of the machine, of the ether of petrol, +which is uncongealable, and a good lubricant for the moving parts. +When once the desired region of cold is reached, air itself is +used, which moistens the metals but does not completely avoid +friction; so that the results would have remained only middling, +had not this ingenious physicist devised a new improvement which +has some analogy with superheating of steam in steam engines. He +slightly varies the initial temperature of the compressed air on +the verge of liquefaction so as to avoid a zone of deep +perturbations in the properties of fluids, which would make the +work of expansion very feeble and the cold produced consequently +slight. This improvement, simple as it is in appearance, presents +several other advantages which immediately treble the output.</p> +<p>The special object of M. Claude was to obtain oxygen in a +practical manner by the actual distillation of liquid air. Since +nitrogen boils at -194° and oxygen at -180.5° C., if liquid +air be evaporated, the nitrogen escapes, especially at the +commencement of the evaporation, while the oxygen concentrates in +the residual liquid, which finally consists of pure oxygen, while +at the same time the temperature rises to the boiling-point +(-180.5° C.) of oxygen. But liquid air is costly, and if one +were content to evaporate it for the purpose of collecting a part +of the oxygen in the residuum, the process would have a very poor +result from the commercial point of view. As early as 1892, Mr +Parkinson thought of improving the output by recovering the cold +produced by liquid air during its evaporation; but an incorrect +idea, which seems to have resulted from certain experiments of +Dewar—the idea that the phenomenon of the liquefaction of air +would not be, owing to certain peculiarities, the exact converse of +that of vaporization—led to the employment of very imperfect +apparatus. M. Claude, however, by making use of a method which he +calls the reversal<a name="FNanchor_8_8" id="FNanchor_8_8"></a> +<a href="#Footnote_8_8" class="fnanchor">[8]</a> method, obtains a +complete rectification in a remarkably simple manner and under +extremely advantageous economic conditions. Apparatus, of +surprisingly reduced dimensions but of great efficiency, is now in +daily work, which easily enables more than a thousand cubic metres +of oxygen to be obtained at the rate, per horse-power, of more than +a cubic metre per hour.</p> +<p>It is in England, thanks to the skill of Sir James Dewar and his +pupils—thanks also, it must be said, to the generosity of the +Royal Institution, which has devoted considerable sums to these +costly experiments—that the most numerous and systematic +researches have been effected on the production of intense cold. I +shall here note only the more important results, especially those +relating to the properties of bodies at low temperatures.</p> +<p>Their electrical properties, in particular, undergo some +interesting modifications. The order which metals assume in point +of conductivity is no longer the same as at ordinary temperatures. +Thus at -200° C. copper is a better conductor than silver. The +resistance diminishes with the temperature, and, down to about +-200°, this diminution is almost linear, and it would seem that +the resistance tends towards zero when the temperature approaches +the absolute zero. But, after -200°, the pattern of the curves +changes, and it is easy to foresee that at absolute zero the +resistivities of all metals would still have, contrary to what was +formerly supposed, a notable value. Solidified electrolytes which, +at temperatures far below their fusion point, still retain a very +appreciable conductivity, become, on the contrary, perfect +insulators at low temperatures. Their dielectric constants assume +relatively high values. MM. Curie and Compan, who have studied this +question from their own point of view, have noted, moreover, that +the specific inductive capacity changes considerably with the +temperature.</p> +<p>In the same way, magnetic properties have been studied. A very +interesting result is that found in oxygen: the magnetic +susceptibility of this body increases at the moment of +liquefaction. Nevertheless, this increase, which is enormous (since +the susceptibility becomes sixteen hundred times greater than it +was at first), if we take it in connection with equal volumes, is +much less considerable if taken in equal masses. It must be +concluded from this fact that the magnetic properties apparently do +not belong to the molecules themselves, but depend on their state +of aggregation.</p> +<p>The mechanical properties of bodies also undergo important +modifications. In general, their cohesion is greatly increased, and +the dilatation produced by slight changes of temperature is +considerable. Sir James Dewar has effected careful measurements of +the dilatation of certain bodies at low temperatures: for example, +of ice. Changes in colour occur, and vermilion and iodide of +mercury pass into pale orange. Phosphorescence becomes more +intense, and most bodies of complex structure—milk, eggs, +feathers, cotton, and flowers—become phosphorescent. The same +is the case with certain simple bodies, such as oxygen, which is +transformed into ozone and emits a white light in the process.</p> +<p>Chemical affinity is almost put an end to; phosphorus and +potassium remain inert in liquid oxygen. It should, however, be +noted, and this remark has doubtless some interest for the theories +of photographic action, that photographic substances retain, even +at the temperature of liquid hydrogen, a very considerable part of +their sensitiveness to light.</p> +<p>Sir James Dewar has made some important applications of low +temperatures in chemical analysis; he also utilizes them to create +a vacuum. His researches have, in fact, proved that the pressure of +air congealed by liquid hydrogen cannot exceed the millionth of an +atmosphere. We have, then, in this process, an original and rapid +means of creating an excellent vacuum in apparatus of very +different kinds—a means which, in certain cases, may be +particularly convenient.<a name="FNanchor_9_9" id= +"FNanchor_9_9"></a><a href="#Footnote_9_9" class= +"fnanchor">[9]</a></p> +<p>Thanks to these studies, a considerable field has been opened up +for biological research, but in this, which is not our subject, I +shall notice one point only. It has been proved that vital +germs—bacteria, for example—may be kept for seven days +at -l90°C. without their vitality being modified. +Phosphorescent organisms cease, it is true, to shine at the +temperature of liquid air, but this fact is simply due to the +oxidations and other chemical reactions which keep up the +phosphorescence being then suspended, for phosphorescent activity +reappears so soon as the temperature is again sufficiently raised. +An important conclusion has been drawn from these experiments which +affects cosmogonical theories: since the cold of space could not +kill the germs of life, it is in no way absurd to suppose that, +under proper conditions, a germ may be transmitted from one planet +to another.</p> +<p>Among the discoveries made with the new processes, the one which +most strikingly interested public attention is that of new gases in +the atmosphere. We know how Sir William Ramsay and Dr. Travers +first observed by means of the spectroscope the characteristics of +the <i>companions</i> of argon in the least volatile part of the +atmosphere. Sir James Dewar on the one hand, and Sir William Ramsay +on the other, subsequently separated in addition to argon and +helium, crypton, xenon, and neon. The process employed consists +essentially in first solidifying the least volatile part of the air +and then causing it to evaporate with extreme slowness. A tube with +electrodes enables the spectrum of the gas in process of +distillation to be observed. In this manner, the spectra of the +various gases may be seen following one another in the inverse +order of their volatility. All these gases are monoatomic, like +mercury; that is to say, they are in the most simple state, they +possess no internal molecular energy (unless it is that which heat +is capable of supplying), and they even seem to have no chemical +energy. Everything leads to the belief that they show the existence +on the earth of an earlier state of things now vanished. It may be +supposed, for instance, that helium and neon, of which the +molecular mass is very slight, were formerly more abundant on our +planet; but at an epoch when the temperature of the globe was +higher, the very speed of their molecules may have reached a +considerable value, exceeding, for instance, eleven kilometres per +second, which suffices to explain why they should have left our +atmosphere. Crypton and neon, which have a density four times +greater than oxygen, may, on the contrary, have partly disappeared +by solution at the bottom of the sea, where it is not absurd to +suppose that considerable quantities would be found liquefied at +great depths. <a name="FNanchor_10_10" id="FNanchor_10_10"></a> +<a href="#Footnote_10_10" class="fnanchor">[10]</a></p> +<p>It is probable, moreover, that the higher regions of the +atmosphere are not composed of the same air as that around us. Sir +James Dewar points out that Dalton's law demands that every gas +composing the atmosphere should have, at all heights and +temperatures, the same pressure as if it were alone, the pressure +decreasing the less quickly, all things being equal, as its density +becomes less. It results from this that the temperature becoming +gradually lower as we rise in the atmosphere, at a certain altitude +there can no longer remain any traces of oxygen or nitrogen, which +no doubt liquefy, and the atmosphere must be almost exclusively +composed of the most volatile gases, including hydrogen, which M.A. +Gautier has, like Lord Rayleigh and Sir William Ramsay, proved to +exist in the air. The spectrum of the <i>Aurora borealis</i>, in +which are found the lines of those parts of the atmosphere which +cannot be liquefied in liquid hydrogen, together with the lines of +argon, crypton, and xenon, is quite in conformity with this point +of view. It is, however, singular that it should be the spectrum of +crypton, that is to say, of the heaviest gas of the group, which +appears most clearly in the upper regions of the atmosphere.</p> +<p>Among the gases most difficult to liquefy, hydrogen has been the +object of particular research and of really quantitative +experiments. Its properties in a liquid state are now very clearly +known. Its boiling-point, measured with a helium thermometer which +has been compared with thermometers of oxygen and hydrogen, is +-252°; its critical temperature is -241° C.; its critical +pressure, 15 atmospheres. It is four times lighter than water, it +does not present any absorption spectrum, and its specific heat is +the greatest known. It is not a conductor of electricity. +Solidified at 15° absolute, it is far from reminding one by its +aspect of a metal; it rather resembles a piece of perfectly pure +ice, and Dr Travers attributes to it a crystalline structure. The +last gas which has resisted liquefaction, helium, has recently been +obtained in a liquid state; it appears to have its boiling-point in +the neighbourhood of 6° absolute. <a name="FNanchor_11_11" id= +"FNanchor_11_11"></a> <a href="#Footnote_11_11" class= +"fnanchor">[11]</a></p> +<p><br /></p> +<p class="textbold">§ 3. SOLIDS AND LIQUIDS</p> +<p>The interest of the results to which the researches on the +continuity between the liquid and the gaseous states have led is so +great, that numbers of scholars have naturally been induced to +inquire whether something analogous might not be found in the case +of liquids and solids. We might think that a similar continuity +ought to be there met with, that the universal character of the +properties of matter forbade all real discontinuity between two +different states, and that, in truth, the solid was a prolongation +of the liquid state.</p> +<p>To discover whether this supposition is correct, it concerns us +to compare the properties of liquids and solids. If we find that +all properties are common to the two states we have the right to +believe, even if they presented themselves in different degrees, +that, by a continuous series of intermediary bodies, the two +classes might yet be connected. If, on the other hand, we discover +that there exists in these two classes some quality of a different +nature, we must necessarily conclude that there is a discontinuity +which nothing can remove.</p> +<p>The distinction established, from the point of view of daily +custom, between solids and liquids, proceeds especially from the +difficulty that we meet with in the one case, and the facility in +the other, when we wish to change their form temporarily or +permanently by the action of mechanical force. This distinction +only corresponds, however, in reality, to a difference in the value +of certain coefficients. It is impossible to discover by this means +any absolute characteristic which establishes a separation between +the two classes. Modern researches prove this clearly. It is not +without use, in order to well understand them, to state precisely +the meaning of a few terms generally rather loosely employed.</p> +<p>If a conjunction of forces acting on a homogeneous material mass +happens to deform it without compressing or dilating it, two very +distinct kinds of reactions may appear which oppose themselves to +the effort exercised. During the time of deformation, and during +that time only, the first make their influence felt. They depend +essentially on the greater or less rapidity of the deformation, +they cease with the movement, and could not, in any case, bring the +body back to its pristine state of equilibrium. The existence of +these reactions leads us to the idea of viscosity or internal +friction.</p> +<p>The second kind of reactions are of a different nature. They +continue to act when the deformation remains stationary, and, if +the external forces happen to disappear, they are capable of +causing the body to return to its initial form, provided a certain +limit has not been exceeded. These last constitute rigidity.</p> +<p>At first sight a solid body appears to have a finite rigidity +and an infinite viscosity; a liquid, on the contrary, presents a +certain viscosity, but no rigidity. But if we examine the matter +more closely, beginning either with the solids or with the liquids, +we see this distinction vanish.</p> +<p>Tresca showed long ago that internal friction is not infinite in +a solid; certain bodies can, so to speak, at once flow and be +moulded. M.W. Spring has given many examples of such phenomena. On +the other hand, viscosity in liquids is never non-existent; for +were it so for water, for example, in the celebrated experiment +effected by Joule for the determination of the mechanical +equivalent of the caloric, the liquid borne along by the floats +would slide without friction on the surrounding liquid, and the +work done by movement would be the same whether the floats did or +did not plunge into the liquid mass.</p> +<p>In certain cases observed long ago with what are called pasty +bodies, this viscosity attains a value almost comparable to that +observed by M. Spring in some solids. Nor does rigidity allow us to +establish a barrier between the two states. Notwithstanding the +extreme mobility of their particles, liquids contain, in fact, +vestiges of the property which we formerly wished to consider the +special characteristic of solids.</p> +<p>Maxwell before succeeded in rendering the existence of this +rigidity very probable by examining the optical properties of a +deformed layer of liquid. But a Russian physicist, M. Schwedoff, +has gone further, and has been able by direct experiments to show +that a sheath of liquid set between two solid cylinders tends, when +one of the cylinders is subjected to a slight rotation, to return +to its original position, and gives a measurable torsion to a +thread upholding the cylinder. From the knowledge of this torsion +the rigidity can be deduced. In the case of a solution containing +1/2 per cent. of gelatine, it is found that this rigidity, enormous +compared with that of water, is still, however, one trillion eight +hundred and forty billion times less than that of steel.</p> +<p>This figure, exact within a few billions, proves that the +rigidity is very slight, but exists; and that suffices for a +characteristic distinction to be founded on this property. In a +general way, M. Spring has also established that we meet in solids, +in a degree more or less marked, with the properties of liquids. +When they are placed in suitable conditions of pressure and time, +they flow through orifices, transmit pressure in all directions, +diffuse and dissolve one into the other, and react chemically on +each other. They may be soldered together by compression; by the +same means alloys may be produced; and further, which seems to +clearly prove that matter in a solid state is not deprived of all +molecular mobility, it is possible to realise suitable limited +reactions and equilibria between solid salts, and these equilibria +obey the fundamental laws of thermodynamics.</p> +<p>Thus the definition of a solid cannot be drawn from its +mechanical properties. It cannot be said, after what we have just +seen, that solid bodies retain their form, nor that they have a +limited elasticity, for M. Spring has made known a case where the +elasticity of solids is without any limit.</p> +<p>It was thought that in the case of a different +phenomenon—that of crystallization—we might arrive at a +clear distinction, because here we should he dealing with a +specific quality; and that crystallized bodies would be the true +solids, amorphous bodies being at that time regarded as liquids +viscous in the extreme.</p> +<p>But the studies of a German physicist, Professor 0. Lehmann, +seem to prove that even this means is not infallible. Professor +Lehmann has succeeded, in fact, in obtaining with certain organic +compounds—oleate of potassium, for instance—under +certain conditions some peculiar states to which he has given the +name of semi-fluid and liquid crystals. These singular phenomena +can only be observed and studied by means of a microscope, and the +Carlsruhe Professor had to devise an ingenious apparatus which +enabled him to bring the preparation at the required temperature on +to the very plate of the microscope.</p> +<p>It is thus made evident that these bodies act on polarized light +in the manner of a crystal. Those that M. Lehmann terms semi-liquid +still present traces of polyhedric delimitation, but with the peaks +and angles rounded by surface-tension, while the others tend to a +strictly spherical form. The optical examination of the first-named +bodies is very difficult, because appearances may be produced which +are due to the phenomena of refraction and imitate those of +polarization. For the other kind, which are often as mobile as +water, the fact that they polarize light is absolutely +unquestionable.</p> +<p>Unfortunately, all these liquids are turbid, and it may be +objected that they are not homogeneous. This want of homogeneity +may, according to M. Quincke, be due to the existence of particles +suspended in a liquid in contact with another liquid miscible with +it and enveloping it as might a membrane, and the phenomena of +polarization would thus be quite naturally explained.<a name= +"FNanchor_12_12" id="FNanchor_12_12"></a> <a href="#Footnote_12_12" +class="fnanchor">[12]</a></p> +<p>M. Tamman is of opinion that it is more a question of an +emulsion, and, on this hypothesis, the action on light would +actually be that which has been observed. Various experimenters +have endeavoured of recent years to elucidate this question. It +cannot be considered absolutely settled, but these very curious +experiments, pursued with great patience and remarkable ingenuity, +allow us to think that there really exist certain intermediary +forms between crystals and liquids in which bodies still retain a +peculiar structure, and consequently act on light, but nevertheless +possess considerable plasticity.</p> +<p>Let us note that the question of the continuity of the liquid +and solid states is not quite the same as the question of knowing +whether there exist bodies intermediate in all respects between the +solids and liquids. These two problems are often wrongly confused. +The gap between the two classes of bodies may be filled by certain +substances with intermediate properties, such as pasty bodies and +bodies liquid but still crystallized, because they have not yet +completely lost their peculiar structure. Yet the transition is not +necessarily established in a continuous fashion when we are dealing +with the passage of one and the same determinate substance from the +liquid to the solid form. We conceive that this change may take +place by insensible degrees in the case of an amorphous body. But +it seems hardly possible to consider the case of a crystal, in +which molecular movements must be essentially regular, as a natural +sequence to the case of the liquid where we are, on the contrary, +in presence of an extremely disordered state of movement.</p> +<p>M. Taminan has demonstrated that amorphous solids may very well, +in fact, be regarded as superposed liquids endowed with very great +viscosity. But it is no longer the same thing when the solid is +once in the crystallized state. There is then a solution of +continuity of the various properties of the substance, and the two +phases may co-exist.</p> +<p>We might presume also, by analogy with what happens with liquids +and gases, that if we followed the curve of transformation of the +crystalline into the liquid phase, we might arrive at a kind of +critical point at which the discontinuity of their properties would +vanish.</p> +<p>Professor Poynting, and after him Professor Planck and Professor +Ostwald, supposed this to be the case, but more recently M. Tamman +has shown that such a point does not exist, and that the region of +stability of the crystallized state is limited on all sides. All +along the curve of transformation the two states may exist in +equilibrium, but we may assert that it is impossible to realize a +continuous series of intermediaries between these two states. There +will always be a more or less marked discontinuity in some of the +properties.</p> +<p>In the course of his researches M. Tamman has been led to +certain very important observations, and has met with fresh +allotropic modifications in nearly all substances, which singularly +complicate the question. In the case of water, for instance, he +finds that ordinary ice transforms itself, under a given pressure, +at the temperature of -80° C. into another crystalline variety +which is denser than water.</p> +<p>The statics of solids under high pressure is as yet, therefore, +hardly drafted, but it seems to promise results which will not be +identical with those obtained for the statics of fluids, though it +will present at least an equal interest.</p> +<p><br /></p> +<p class="textbold">§ 4. THE DEFORMATIONS OF SOLIDS</p> +<p>If the mechanical properties of the bodies intermediate between +solids and liquids have only lately been the object of systematic +studies, admittedly solid substances have been studied for a long +time. Yet, notwithstanding the abundance of researches published on +elasticity by theorists and experimenters, numerous questions with +regard to them still remain in suspense.</p> +<p>We only propose to briefly indicate here a few problems recently +examined, without going into the details of questions which belong +more to the domain of mechanics than to that of pure physics.</p> +<p>The deformations produced in solid bodies by increasing efforts +arrange themselves in two distinct periods. If the efforts are +weak, the deformations produced are also very weak and disappear +when the effort ceases. They are then termed elastic. If the +efforts exceed a certain value, a part only of these deformations +disappear, and a part are permanent.</p> +<p>The purity of the note emitted by a sound has been often invoked +as a proof of the perfect isochronism of the oscillation, and, +consequently, as a demonstration <i>a posteriori</i> of the +correctness of the early law of Hoocke governing elastic +deformations. This law has, however, during some years been +frequently disputed. Certain mechanicians or physicists freely +admit it to be incorrect, especially as regards extremely weak +deformations. According to a theory in some favour, especially in +Germany, <i>i.e.</i> the theory of Bach, the law which connects the +elastic deformations with the efforts would be an exponential one. +Recent experiments by Professors Kohlrausch and Gruncisen, executed +under varied and precise conditions on brass, cast iron, slate, and +wrought iron, do not appear to confirm Bach's law. Nothing, in +point of fact, authorises the rejection of the law of Hoocke, which +presents itself as the most natural and most simple approximation +to reality.</p> +<p>The phenomena of permanent deformation are very complex, and it +certainly seems that they cannot be explained by the older theories +which insisted that the molecules only acted along the straight +line which joined their centres. It becomes necessary, then, to +construct more complete hypotheses, as the MM. Cosserat have done +in some excellent memoirs, and we may then succeed in grouping +together the facts resulting from new experiments. Among the +experiments of which every theory must take account may be +mentioned those by which Colonel Hartmann has placed in evidence +the importance of the lines which are produced on the surface of +metals when the limit of elasticity is exceeded.</p> +<p>It is to questions of the same order that the minute and patient +researches of M. Bouasse have been directed. This physicist, as +ingenious as he is profound, has pursued for several years +experiments on the most delicate points relating to the theory of +elasticity, and he has succeeded in defining with a precision not +always attained even in the best esteemed works, the deformations +to which a body must be subjected in order to obtain comparable +experiments. With regard to the slight oscillations of torsion +which he has specially studied, M. Bouasse arrives at the +conclusion, in an acute discussion, that we hardly know anything +more than was proclaimed a hundred years ago by Coulomb. We see, by +this example, that admirable as is the progress accomplished in +certain regions of physics, there still exist many over-neglected +regions which remain in painful darkness. The skill shown by M. +Bouasse authorises us to hope that, thanks to his researches, a +strong light will some day illumine these unknown corners.</p> +<p>A particularly interesting chapter on elasticity is that +relating to the study of crystals; and in the last few years it has +been the object of remarkable researches on the part of M. Voigt. +These researches have permitted a few controversial questions +between theorists and experimenters to be solved: in particular, M. +Voigt has verified the consequences of the calculations, taking +care not to make, like Cauchy and Poisson, the hypothesis of +central forces a mere function of distance, and has recognized a +potential which depends on the relative orientation of the +molecules. These considerations also apply to quasi-isotropic +bodies which are, in fact, networks of crystals.</p> +<p>Certain occasional deformations which are produced and disappear +slowly may be considered as intermediate between elastic and +permanent deformations. Of these, the thermal deformation of glass +which manifests itself by the displacement of the zero of a +thermometer is an example. So also the modifications which the +phenomena of magnetic hysteresis or the variations of resistivity +have just demonstrated.</p> +<p>Many theorists have taken in hand these difficult questions. M. +Brillouin endeavours to interpret these various phenomena by the +molecular hypothesis. The attempt may seem bold, since these +phenomena are, for the most part, essentially irreversible, and +seem, consequently, not adaptable to mechanics. But M. Brillouin +makes a point of showing that, under certain conditions, +irreversible phenomena may be created between two material points, +the actions of which depend solely on their distance; and he +furnishes striking instances which appear to prove that a great +number of irreversible physical and chemical phenomena may be +ascribed to the existence of states of unstable equilibria.</p> +<p>M. Duhem has approached the problem from another side, and +endeavours to bring it within the range of thermodynamics. Yet +ordinary thermodynamics could not account for experimentally +realizable states of equilibrium in the phenomena of viscosity and +friction, since this science declares them to be impossible. M. +Duhem, however, arrives at the idea that the establishment of the +equations of thermodynamics presupposes, among other hypotheses, +one which is entirely arbitrary, namely: that when the state of the +system is given, external actions capable of maintaining it in that +state are determined without ambiguity, by equations termed +conditions of equilibrium of the system. If we reject this +hypothesis, it will then be allowable to introduce into +thermodynamics laws previously excluded, and it will be possible to +construct, as M. Duhem has done, a much more comprehensive +theory.</p> +<p>The ideas of M. Duhem have been illustrated by remarkable +experimental work. M. Marchis, for example, guided by these ideas, +has studied the permanent modifications produced in glass by an +oscillation of temperature. These modifications, which may be +called phenomena of the hysteresis of dilatation, may be followed +in very appreciable fashion by means of a glass thermometer. The +general results are quite in accord with the previsions of M. +Duhem. M. Lenoble in researches on the traction of metallic wires, +and M. Chevalier in experiments on the permanent variations of the +electrical resistance of wires of an alloy of platinum and silver +when submitted to periodical variations of temperature, have +likewise afforded verifications of the theory propounded by M. +Duhem.</p> +<p>In this theory, the representative system is considered +dependent on the temperature of one or several other variables, +such as, for example, a chemical variable. A similar idea has been +developed in a very fine set of memoirs on nickel steel, by M. Ch. +Ed. Guillaume. The eminent physicist, who, by his earlier +researches, has greatly contributed to the light thrown on the +analogous question of the displacement of the zero in thermometers, +concludes, from fresh researches, that the residual phenomena are +due to chemical variations, and that the return to the primary +chemical state causes the variation to disappear. He applies his +ideas not only to the phenomena presented by irreversible steels, +but also to very different facts; for example, to phosphorescence, +certain particularities of which may be interpreted in an analogous +manner.</p> +<p>Nickel steels present the most curious properties, and I have +already pointed out the paramount importance of one of them, hardly +capable of perceptible dilatation, for its application to metrology +and chronometry.<a name="FNanchor_13_13" id="FNanchor_13_13"></a> +<a href="#Footnote_13_13" class="fnanchor">[13]</a> Others, also +discovered by M. Guillaume in the course of studies conducted with +rare success and remarkable ingenuity, may render great services, +because it is possible to regulate, so to speak, at will their +mechanical or magnetic properties.</p> +<p>The study of alloys in general is, moreover, one of those in +which the introduction of the methods of physics has produced the +greatest effects. By the microscopic examination of a polished +surface or of one indented by a reagent, by the determination of +the electromotive force of elements of which an alloy forms one of +the poles, and by the measurement of the resistivities, the +densities, and the differences of potential or contact, the most +valuable indications as to their constitution are obtained. M. Le +Chatelier, M. Charpy, M. Dumas, M. Osmond, in France; Sir W. +Roberts Austen and Mr. Stansfield, in England, have given manifold +examples of the fertility of these methods. The question, moreover, +has had a new light thrown upon it by the application of the +principles of thermodynamics and of the phase rule.</p> +<p>Alloys are generally known in the two states of solid and +liquid. Fused alloys consist of one or several solutions of the +component metals and of a certain number of definite combinations. +Their composition may thus be very complex: but Gibbs' rule gives +us at once important information on the point, since it indicates +that there cannot exist, in general, more than two distinct +solutions in an alloy of two metals.</p> +<p>Solid alloys may be classed like liquid ones. Two metals or more +dissolve one into the other, and form a solid solution quite +analogous to the liquid solution. But the study of these solid +solutions is rendered singularly difficult by the fact that the +equilibrium so rapidly reached in the case of liquids in this case +takes days and, in certain cases, perhaps even centuries to become +established.</p> +<hr style="width: 65%;" /> +<h3><a name="CHAPTER_V" id="CHAPTER_V"></a>CHAPTER V</h3> +<h2>SOLUTIONS AND ELECTROLYTIC DISSOCIATION</h2> +<p class="textbold">§ 1. SOLUTION</p> +<p>Vaporization and fusion are not the only means by which the +physical state of a body may be changed without modifying its +chemical constitution. From the most remote periods solution has +also been known and studied, but only in the last twenty years have +we obtained other than empirical information regarding this +phenomenon.</p> +<p>It is natural to employ here also the methods which have allowed +us to penetrate into the knowledge of other transformations. The +problem of solution may be approached by way of thermodynamics and +of the hypotheses of kinetics.</p> +<p>As long ago as 1858, Kirchhoff, by attributing to saline +solutions—that is to say, to mixtures of water and a +non-volatile liquid like sulphuric acid—the properties of +internal energy, discovered a relation between the quantity of heat +given out on the addition of a certain quantity of water to a +solution and the variations to which condensation and temperature +subject the vapour-tension of the solution. He calculated for this +purpose the variations of energy which are produced when passing +from one state to another by two different series of +transformations; and, by comparing the two expressions thus +obtained, he established a relation between the various elements of +the phenomenon. But, for a long time afterwards, the question made +little progress, because there seemed to be hardly any means of +introducing into this study the second principle of +thermodynamics.<a name="FNanchor_14_14" id="FNanchor_14_14"></a> +<a href="#Footnote_14_14" class="fnanchor">[14]</a> It was the +memoir of Gibbs which at last opened out this rich domain and +enabled it to be rationally exploited. As early as 1886, M. Duhem +showed that the theory of the thermodynamic potential furnished +precise information on solutions or liquid mixtures. He thus +discovered over again the famous law on the lowering of the +congelation temperature of solvents which had just been established +by M. Raoult after a long series of now classic researches.</p> +<p>In the minds of many persons, however, grave doubts persisted. +Solution appeared to be an essentially irreversible phenomenon. It +was therefore, in all strictness, impossible to calculate the +entropy of a solution, and consequently to be certain of the value +of the thermodynamic potential. The objection would be serious even +to-day, and, in calculations, what is called the paradox of Gibbs +would be an obstacle.</p> +<p>We should not hesitate, however, to apply the Phase Law to +solutions, and this law already gives us the key to a certain +number of facts. It puts in evidence, for example, the part played +by the eutectic point—that is to say, the point at which (to +keep to the simple case in which we have to do with two bodies +only, the solvent and the solute) the solution is in equilibrium at +once with the two possible solids, the dissolved body and the +solvent solidified. The knowledge of this point explains the +properties of refrigerating mixtures, and it is also one of the +most useful for the theory of alloys. The scruples of physicists +ought to have been removed on the memorable occasion when Professor +Van t'Hoff demonstrated that solution can operate reversibly by +reason of the phenomena of osmosis. But the experiment can only +succeed in very rare cases; and, on the other hand, Professor Van +t'Hoff was naturally led to another very bold conception. He +regarded the molecule of the dissolved body as a gaseous one, and +assimilated solution, not as had hitherto been the rule, to fusion, +but to a kind of vaporization. Naturally his ideas were not +immediately accepted by the scholars most closely identified with +the classic tradition. It may perhaps not be without use to examine +here the principles of Professor Van t'Hoff's theory.</p> +<p><br /></p> +<p class="textbold">§ 2. OSMOSIS</p> +<p>Osmosis, or diffusion through a septum, is a phenomenon which +has been known for some time. The discovery of it is attributed to +the Abbé Nollet, who is supposed to have observed it in +1748, during some "researches on liquids in ebullition." A classic +experiment by Dutrochet, effected about 1830, makes this phenomenon +clear. Into pure water is plunged the lower part of a vertical tube +containing pure alcohol, open at the top and closed at the bottom +by a membrane, such as a pig's bladder, without any visible +perforation. In a very short time it will be found, by means of an +areometer for instance, that the water outside contains alcohol, +while the alcohol of the tube, pure at first, is now diluted. Two +currents have therefore passed through the membrane, one of water +from the outside to the inside, and one of alcohol in the converse +direction. It is also noted that a difference in the levels has +occurred, and that the liquid in the tube now rises to a +considerable height. It must therefore be admitted that the flow of +the water has been more rapid than that of the alcohol. At the +commencement, the water must have penetrated into the tube much +more rapidly than the alcohol left it. Hence the difference in the +levels, and, consequently, a difference of pressure on the two +faces of the membrane. This difference goes on increasing, reaches +a maximum, then diminishes, and vanishes when the diffusion is +complete, final equilibrium being then attained.</p> +<p>The phenomenon is evidently connected with diffusion. If water +is very carefully poured on to alcohol, the two layers, separate at +first, mingle by degrees till a homogeneous substance is obtained. +The bladder seems not to have prevented this diffusion from taking +place, but it seems to have shown itself more permeable to water +than to alcohol. May it not therefore be supposed that there must +exist dividing walls in which this difference of permeability +becomes greater and greater, which would be permeable to the +solvent and absolutely impermeable to the solute? If this be so, +the phenomena of these <i>semi-permeable</i> walls, as they are +termed, can be observed in particularly simple conditions.</p> +<p>The answer to this question has been furnished by biologists, at +which we cannot be surprised. The phenomena of osmosis are +naturally of the first importance in the action of organisms, and +for a long time have attracted the attention of naturalists. De +Vries imagined that the contractions noticed in the protoplasm of +cells placed in saline solutions were due to a phenomenon of +osmosis, and, upon examining more closely certain peculiarities of +cell life, various scholars have demonstrated that living cells are +enclosed in membranes permeable to certain substances and entirely +impermeable to others. It was interesting to try to reproduce +artificially semi-permeable walls analogous to those thus met with +in nature;<a name="FNanchor_15_15" id="FNanchor_15_15"></a> +<a href="#Footnote_15_15" class="fnanchor">[15]</a> and Traube and +Pfeffer seem to have succeeded in one particular case. Traube has +pointed out that the very delicate membrane of ferrocyanide of +potassium which is obtained with some difficulty by exposing it to +the reaction of sulphate of copper, is permeable to water, but will +not permit the passage of the majority of salts. Pfeffer, by +producing these walls in the interstices of a porous porcelain, has +succeeded in giving them sufficient rigidity to allow measurements +to be made. It must be allowed that, unfortunately, no physicist or +chemist has been as lucky as these two botanists; and the attempts +to reproduce semi-permeable walls completely answering to the +definition, have never given but mediocre results. If, however, the +experimental difficulty has not been overcome in an entirely +satisfactory manner, it at least appears very probable that such +walls may nevertheless exist.<a name="FNanchor_16_16" id= +"FNanchor_16_16"></a> <a href="#Footnote_16_16" class= +"fnanchor">[16]</a></p> +<p>Nevertheless, in the case of gases, there exists an excellent +example of a semi-permeable wall, and a partition of platinum +brought to a higher than red heat is, as shown by M. Villard in +some ingenious experiments, completely impermeable to air, and very +permeable, on the contrary, to hydrogen. It can also be +experimentally demonstrated that on taking two recipients separated +by such a partition, and both containing nitrogen mixed with +varying proportions of hydrogen, the last-named gas will pass +through the partition in such a way that the +concentration—that is to say, the mass of gas per unit of +volume—will become the same on both sides. Only then will +equilibrium be established; and, at that moment, an excess of +pressure will naturally be produced in that recipient which, at the +commencement, contained the gas with the smallest quantity of +hydrogen.</p> +<p>This experiment enables us to anticipate what will happen in a +liquid medium with semi-permeable partitions. Between two +recipients, one containing pure water, the other, say, water with +sugar in solution, separated by one of these partitions, there will +be produced merely a movement of the pure towards the sugared +water, and following this, an increase of pressure on the side of +the last. But this increase will not be without limits. At a +certain moment the pressure will cease to increase and will remain +at a fixed value which now has a given direction. This is the +osmotic pressure.</p> +<p>Pfeffer demonstrated that, for the same substance, the osmotic +pressure is proportional to the concentration, and consequently in +inverse ratio to the volume occupied by a similar mass of the +solute. He gave figures from which it was easy, as Professor Van +t'Hoff found, to draw the conclusion that, in a constant volume, +the osmotic pressure is proportional to the absolute temperature. +De Vries, moreover, by his remarks on living cells, extended the +results which Pfeffer had applied to one case only—that is, +to the one that he had been able to examine experimentally.</p> +<p>Such are the essential facts of osmosis. We may seek to +interpret them and to thoroughly examine the mechanism of the +phenomenon; but it must be acknowledged that as regards this point, +physicists are not entirely in accord. In the opinion of Professor +Nernst, the permeability of semi-permeable membranes is simply due +to differences of solubility in one of the substances of the +membrane itself. Other physicists think it attributable, either to +the difference in the dimensions of the molecules, of which some +might pass through the pores of the membrane and others be stopped +by their relative size, or to these molecules' greater or less +mobility. For others, again, it is the capillary phenomena which +here act a preponderating part.</p> +<p>This last idea is already an old one: Jager, More, and Professor +Traube have all endeavoured to show that the direction and speed of +osmosis are determined by differences in the surface-tensions; and +recent experiments, especially those of Batelli, seem to prove that +osmosis establishes itself in the way which best equalizes the +surface-tensions of the liquids on both sides of the partition. +Solutions possessing the same surface-tension, though not in +molecular equilibrium, would thus be always in osmotic equilibrium. +We must not conceal from ourselves that this result would be in +contradiction with the kinetic theory.</p> +<p><br /></p> +<p class="textbold">§ 3. APPLICATION TO THE THEORY OF +SOLUTION</p> +<p>If there really exist partitions permeable to one body and +impermeable to another, it may be imagined that the homogeneous +mixture of these two bodies might be effected in the converse way. +It can be easily conceived, in fact, that by the aid of osmotic +pressure it would be possible, for example, to dilute or +concentrate a solution by driving through the partition in one +direction or another a certain quantity of the solvent by means of +a pressure kept equal to the osmotic pressure. This is the +important fact which Professor Van t' Hoff perceived. The existence +of such a wall in all possible cases evidently remains only a very +legitimate hypothesis,—a fact which ought not to be +concealed.</p> +<p>Relying solely on this postulate, Professor Van t' Hoff easily +established, by the most correct method, certain properties of the +solutions of gases in a volatile liquid, or of non-volatile bodies +in a volatile liquid. To state precisely the other relations, we +must admit, in addition, the experimental laws discovered by +Pfeffer. But without any hypothesis it becomes possible to +demonstrate the laws of Raoult on the lowering of the +vapour-tension and of the freezing point of solutions, and also the +ratio which connects the heat of fusion with this decrease.</p> +<p>These considerable results can evidently be invoked as <i>a +posteriori</i> proofs of the exactitude of the experimental laws of +osmosis. They are not, however, the only ones that Professor Van t' +Hoff has obtained by the same method. This illustrious scholar was +thus able to find anew Guldberg and Waage's law on chemical +equilibrium at a constant temperature, and to show how the position +of the equilibrium changes when the temperature happens to +change.</p> +<p>If now we state, in conformity with the laws of Pfeffer, that +the product of the osmotic pressure by the volume of the solution +is equal to the absolute temperature multiplied by a coefficient, +and then look for the numerical figure of this latter in a solution +of sugar, for instance, we find that this value is the same as that +of the analogous coefficient of the characteristic equation of a +perfect gas. There is in this a coincidence which has also been +utilized in the preceding thermodynamic calculations. It may be +purely fortuitous, but we can hardly refrain from finding in it a +physical meaning.</p> +<p>Professor Van t'Hoff has considered this coincidence a +demonstration that there exists a strong analogy between a body in +solution and a gas; as a matter of fact, it may seem that, in a +solution, the distance between the molecules becomes comparable to +the molecular distances met with in gases, and that the molecule +acquires the same degree of liberty and the same simplicity in both +phenomena. In that case it seems probable that solutions will be +subject to laws independent of the chemical nature of the dissolved +molecule and comparable to the laws governing gases, while if we +adopt the kinetic image for the gas, we shall be led to represent +to ourselves in a similar way the phenomena which manifest +themselves in a solution. Osmotic pressure will then appear to be +due to the shock of the dissolved molecules against the membrane. +It will come from one side of this partition to superpose itself on +the hydrostatic pressure, which latter must have the same value on +both sides.</p> +<p>The analogy with a perfect gas naturally becomes much greater as +the solution becomes more diluted. It then imitates gas in some +other properties; the internal work of the variation of volume is +nil, and the specific heat is only a function of the temperature. A +solution which is diluted by a reversible method is cooled like a +gas which expands adiabatically.<a name="FNanchor_17_17" id= +"FNanchor_17_17"></a> <a href="#Footnote_17_17" class= +"fnanchor">[17]</a></p> +<p>It must, however, be acknowledged that, in other points, the +analogy is much less perfect. The opinion which sees in solution a +phenomenon resembling fusion, and which has left an indelible trace +in everyday language (we shall always say: to melt sugar in water) +is certainly not without foundation. Certain of the reasons which +might be invoked to uphold this opinion are too evident to be +repeated here, though others more recondite might be quoted. The +fact that the internal energy generally becomes independent of the +concentration when the dilution reaches even a moderately high +value is rather in favour of the hypothesis of fusion.</p> +<p>We must not forget, however, the continuity of the liquid and +gaseous states; and we may consider it in an absolute way a +question devoid of sense to ask whether in a solution the solute is +in the liquid or the gaseous state. It is in the fluid state, and +perhaps in conditions opposed to those of a body in the state of a +perfect gas. It is known, of course, that in this case the +manometrical pressure must be regarded as very great in relation to +the internal pressure which, in the characteristic equation, is +added to the other. May it not seem possible that in the solution +it is, on the contrary, the internal pressure which is dominant, +the manometric pressure becoming of no account? The coincidence of +the formulas would thus be verified, for all the characteristic +equations are symmetrical with regard to these two pressures. From +this point of view the osmotic pressure would be considered as the +result of an attraction between the solvent and the solute; and it +would represent the difference between the internal pressures of +the solution and of the pure solvent. These hypotheses are highly +interesting, and very suggestive; but from the way in which the +facts have been set forth, it will appear, no doubt, that there is +no obligation to admit them in order to believe in the legitimacy +of the application of thermodynamics to the phenomena of +solution.</p> +<p><br /></p> +<p class="textbold">§ 4. ELECTROLYTIC DISSOCIATION</p> +<p>From the outset Professor Van t' Hoff was brought to acknowledge +that a great number of solutions formed very notable exceptions +which were very irregular in appearance. The analogy with gases did +not seem to be maintained, for the osmotic pressure had a very +different value from that indicated by the theory. Everything, +however, came right if one multiplied by a factor, determined +according to each case, but greater than unity, the constant of the +characteristic formula. Similar divergences were manifested in the +delays observed in congelation, and disappeared when subjected to +an analogous correction.</p> +<p>Thus the freezing-point of a normal solution, containing a +molecule gramme (that is, the number of grammes equal to the figure +representing the molecular mass) of alcohol or sugar in water, +falls 1.85° C. If the laws of solution were identically the +same for a solution of sea-salt, the same depression should be +noticed in a saline solution also containing 1 molecule per litre. +In fact, the fall reaches 3.26°, and the solution behaves as if +it contained, not 1, but 1.75 normal molecules per litre. The +consideration of the osmotic pressures would lead to similar +observations, but we know that the experiment would be more +difficult and less precise.</p> +<p>We may wonder whether anything really analogous to this can be +met with in the case of a gas, and we are thus led to consider the +phenomena of dissociation.<a name="FNanchor_18_18" id= +"FNanchor_18_18"></a> <a href="#Footnote_18_18" class= +"fnanchor">[18]</a> If we heat a body which, in a gaseous state, is +capable of dissociation—hydriodic acid, for example—at +a given temperature, an equilibrium is established between three +gaseous bodies, the acid, the iodine, and the hydrogen. The total +mass will follow with fair closeness Mariotte's law, but the +characteristic constant will no longer be the same as in the case +of a non-dissociated gas. We here no longer have to do with a +single molecule, since each molecule is in part dissociated.</p> +<p>The comparison of the two cases leads to the employment of a new +image for representing the phenomenon which has been produced +throughout the saline solution. We have introduced a single +molecule of salt, and everything occurs as if there were 1.75 +molecules. May it not really be said that the number is 1.75, +because the sea-salt is partly dissociated, and a molecule has +become transformed into 0.75 molecule of sodium, 0.75 of chlorium, +and 0.25 of salt?</p> +<p>This is a way of speaking which seems, at first sight, strangely +contradicted by experiment. Professor Van t' Hoff, like other +chemists, would certainly have rejected—in fact, he did so at +first—such a conception, if, about the same time, an +illustrious Swedish scholar, M. Arrhenius, had not been brought to +the same idea by another road, and, had not by stating it precisely +and modifying it, presented it in an acceptable form.</p> +<p>A brief examination will easily show that all the substances +which are exceptions to the laws of Van t'Hoff are precisely those +which are capable of conducting electricity when undergoing +decomposition—that is to say, are electrolytes. The +coincidence is absolute, and cannot be simply due to chance.</p> +<p>Now, the phenomena of electrolysis have, for a long time, forced +upon us an almost necessary image. The saline molecule is always +decomposed, as we know, in the primary phenomenon of electrolysis +into two elements which Faraday termed ions. Secondary reactions, +no doubt, often come to complicate the question, but these are +chemical reactions belonging to the general order of things, and +have nothing to do with the electric action working on the +solution. The simple phenomenon is always the +same—decomposition into two ions, followed by the appearance +of one of these ions at the positive and of the other at the +negative electrode. But as the very slightest expenditure of energy +is sufficient to produce the commencement of electrolysis, it is +necessary to suppose that these two ions are not united by any +force. Thus the two ions are, in a way, dissociated. Clausius, who +was the first to represent the phenomena by this symbol, supposed, +in order not to shock the feelings of chemists too much, that this +dissociation only affected an infinitesimal fraction of the total +number of the molecules of the salt, and thereby escaped all +check.</p> +<p>This concession was unfortunate, and the hypothesis thus lost +the greater part of its usefulness. M. Arrhenius was bolder, and +frankly recognized that dissociation occurs at once in the case of +a great number of molecules, and tends to increase more and more as +the solution becomes more dilute. It follows the comparison with a +gas which, while partially dissociated in an enclosed space, +becomes wholly so in an infinite one.</p> +<p>M. Arrhenius was led to adopt this hypothesis by the examination +of experimental results relating to the conductivity of +electrolytes. In order to interpret certain facts, it has to be +recognized that a part only of the molecules in a saline solution +can be considered as conductors of electricity, and that by adding +water the number of molecular conductors is increased. This +increase, too, though rapid at first, soon becomes slower, and +approaches a certain limit which an infinite dilution would enable +it to attain. If the conducting molecules are the dissociated +molecules, then the dissociation (so long as it is a question of +strong acids and salts) tends to become complete in the case of an +unlimited dilution.</p> +<p>The opposition of a large number of chemists and physicists to +the ideas of M. Arrhenius was at first very fierce. It must be +noted with regret that, in France particularly, recourse was had to +an arm which scholars often wield rather clumsily. They joked about +these free ions in solution, and they asked to see this chlorine +and this sodium which swam about the water in a state of liberty. +But in science, as elsewhere, irony is not argument, and it soon +had to be acknowledged that the hypothesis of M. Arrhenius showed +itself singularly fertile and had to be regarded, at all events, as +a very expressive image, if not, indeed, entirely in conformity +with reality.</p> +<p>It would certainly be contrary to all experience, and even to +common sense itself, to suppose that in dissolved chloride of +sodium there is really free sodium, if we suppose these atoms of +sodium to be absolutely identical with ordinary atoms. But there is +a great difference. In the one case the atoms are electrified, and +carry a relatively considerable positive charge, inseparable from +their state as ions, while in the other they are in the neutral +state. We may suppose that the presence of this charge brings about +modifications as extensive as one pleases in the chemical +properties of the atom. Thus the hypothesis will be removed from +all discussion of a chemical order, since it will have been made +plastic enough beforehand to adapt itself to all the known facts; +and if we object that sodium cannot subsist in water because it +instantaneously decomposes the latter, the answer is simply that +the sodium ion does not decompose water as does ordinary +sodium.</p> +<p>Still, other objections might be raised which could not be so +easily refuted. One, to which chemists not unreasonably attached +great importance, was this:—If a certain quantity of chloride +of sodium is dissociated into chlorine and sodium, it should be +possible, by diffusion, for example, which brings out plainly the +phenomena of dissociation in gases, to extract from the solution a +part either of the chlorine or of the sodium, while the +corresponding part of the other compound would remain. This result +would be in flagrant contradiction with the fact that, everywhere +and always, a solution of salt contains strictly the same +proportions of its component elements.</p> +<p>M. Arrhenius answers to this that the electrical forces in +ordinary conditions prevent separation by diffusion or by any other +process. Professor Nernst goes further, and has shown that the +concentration currents which are produced when two electrodes of +the same substance are plunged into two unequally concentrated +solutions may be interpreted by the hypothesis that, in these +particular conditions, the diffusion does bring about a separation +of the ions. Thus the argument is turned round, and the proof +supposed to be given of the incorrectness of the theory becomes a +further reason in its favour.</p> +<p>It is possible, no doubt, to adduce a few other experiments +which are not very favourable to M. Arrhenius's point of view, but +they are isolated cases; and, on the whole, his theory has enabled +many isolated facts, till then scattered, to be co-ordinated, and +has allowed very varied phenomena to be linked together. It has +also suggested—and, moreover, still daily +suggests—researches of the highest order.</p> +<p>In the first place, the theory of Arrhenius explains +electrolysis very simply. The ions which, so to speak, wander about +haphazard, and are uniformly distributed throughout the liquid, +steer a regular course as soon as we dip in the trough containing +the electrolyte the two electrodes connected with the poles of the +dynamo or generator of electricity. Then the charged positive ions +travel in the direction of the electromotive force and the negative +ions in the opposite direction. On reaching the electrodes they +yield up to them the charges they carry, and thus pass from the +state of ion into that of ordinary atom. Moreover, for the solution +to remain in equilibrium, the vanished ions must be immediately +replaced by others, and thus the state of ionisation of the +electrolyte remains constant and its conductivity persists.</p> +<p>All the peculiarities of electrolysis are capable of +interpretation: the phenomena of the transport of ions, the fine +experiments of M. Bouty, those of Professor Kohlrausch and of +Professor Ostwald on various points in electrolytic conduction, all +support the theory. The verifications of it can even be +quantitative, and we can foresee numerical relations between +conductivity and other phenomena. The measurement of the +conductivity permits the number of molecules dissociated in a given +solution to be calculated, and the number is thus found to be +precisely the same as that arrived at if it is wished to remove the +disagreement between reality and the anticipations which result +from the theory of Professor Van t' Hoff. The laws of cryoscopy, of +tonometry, and of osmosis thus again become strict, and no +exception to them remains.</p> +<p>If the dissociation of salts is a reality and is complete in a +dilute solution, any of the properties of a saline solution +whatever should be represented numerically as the sum of three +values, of which one concerns the positive ion, a second the +negative ion, and the third the solvent. The properties of the +solutions would then be what are called additive properties. +Numerous verifications may be attempted by very different roads. +They generally succeed very well; and whether we measure the +electric conductivity, the density, the specific heats, the index +of refraction, the power of rotatory polarization, the colour, or +the absorption spectrum, the additive property will everywhere be +found in the solution.</p> +<p>The hypothesis, so contested at the outset by the chemists, is, +moreover, assuring its triumph by important conquests in the domain +of chemistry itself. It permits us to give a vivid explanation of +chemical reaction, and for the old motto of the chemists, "Corpora +non agunt, nisi soluta," it substitutes a modern one, "It is +especially the ions which react." Thus, for example, all salts of +iron, which contain iron in the state of ions, give similar +reactions; but salts such as ferrocyanide of potassium, in which +iron does not play the part of an ion, never give the +characteristic reactions of iron.</p> +<p>Professor Ostwald and his pupils have drawn from the hypothesis +of Arrhenius manifold consequences which have been the cause of +considerable progress in physical chemistry. Professor Ostwald has +shown, in particular, how this hypothesis permits the quantitative +calculation of the conditions of equilibrium of electrolytes and +solutions, and especially of the phenomena of neutralization. If a +dissolved salt is partly dissociated into ions, this solution must +be limited by an equilibrium between the non-dissociated molecule +and the two ions resulting from the dissociation; and, assimilating +the phenomenon to the case of gases, we may take for its study the +laws of Gibbs and of Guldberg and Waage. The results are generally +very satisfactory, and new researches daily furnish new checks.</p> +<p>Professor Nernst, who before gave, as has been said, a +remarkable interpretation of the diffusion of electrolytes, has, in +the direction pointed out by M. Arrhenius, developed a theory of +the entire phenomena of electrolysis, which, in particular, +furnishes a striking explanation of the mechanism of the production +of electromotive force in galvanic batteries.</p> +<p>Extending the analogy, already so happily invoked, between the +phenomena met with in solutions and those produced in gases, +Professor Nernst supposes that metals tend, as it were, to vaporize +when in presence of a liquid. A piece of zinc introduced, for +example, into pure water gives birth to a few metallic ions. These +ions become positively charged, while the metal naturally takes an +equal charge, but of contrary sign. Thus the solution and the metal +are both electrified; but this sort of vaporization is hindered by +electrostatic attraction, and as the charges borne by the ions are +considerable, an equilibrium will be established, although the +number of ions which enter the solution will be very small.</p> +<p>If the liquid, instead of being a solvent like pure water, +contains an electrolyte, it already contains metallic ions, the +osmotic pressure of which will be opposite to that of the solution. +Three cases may then present themselves—either there will be +equilibrium, or the electrostatic attraction will oppose itself to +the pressure of solution and the metal will be negatively charged, +or, finally, the attraction will act in the same direction as the +pressure, and the metal will become positively and the solution +negatively charged. Developing this idea, Professor Nernst +calculates, by means of the action of the osmotic pressures, the +variations of energy brought into play and the value of the +differences of potential by the contact of the electrodes and +electrolytes. He deduces this from the electromotive force of a +single battery cell which becomes thus connected with the values of +the osmotic pressures, or, if you will, thanks to the relation +discovered by Van t' Hoff, with the concentrations. Some +particularly interesting electrical phenomena thus become connected +with an already very important group, and a new bridge is built +which unites two regions long considered foreign to each other.</p> +<p>The recent discoveries on the phenomena produced in gases when +rendered conductors of electricity almost force upon us, as we +shall see, the idea that there exist in these gases electrified +centres moving through the field, and this idea gives still greater +probability to the analogous theory explaining the mechanism of the +conductivity of liquids. It will also be useful, in order to avoid +confusion, to restate with precision this notion of electrolytic +ions, and to ascertain their magnitude, charge, and velocity.</p> +<p>The two classic laws of Faraday will supply us with important +information. The first indicates that the quantity of electricity +passing through the liquid is proportional to the quantity of +matter deposited on the electrodes. This leads us at once to the +consideration that, in any given solution, all the ions possess +individual charges equal in absolute value.</p> +<p>The second law may be stated in these terms: an atom-gramme of +metal carries with it into electrolysis a quantity of electricity +proportionate to its valency.<a name="FNanchor_19_19" id= +"FNanchor_19_19"></a> <a href="#Footnote_19_19" class= +"fnanchor">[19]</a></p> +<p>Numerous experiments have made known the total mass of hydrogen +capable of carrying one coulomb, and it will therefore be possible +to estimate the charge of an ion of hydrogen if the number of atoms +of hydrogen in a given mass be known. This last figure is already +furnished by considerations derived from the kinetic theory, and +agrees with the one which can be deduced from the study of various +phenomena. The result is that an ion of hydrogen having a mass of +1.3 x 10^-20 grammes bears a charge of 1.3 X 10^-20 electromagnetic +units; and the second law will immediately enable the charge of any +other ion to be similarly estimated.</p> +<p>The measurements of conductivity, joined to certain +considerations relating to the differences of concentration which +appear round the electrode in electrolysis, allow the speed of the +ions to be calculated. Thus, in a liquid containing 1/10th of a +hydrogen-ion per litre, the absolute speed of an ion would be +3/10ths of a millimetre per second in a field where the fall of +potential would be 1 volt per centimetre. Sir Oliver Lodge, who has +made direct experiments to measure this speed, has obtained a +figure very approximate to this. This value is very small compared +to that which we shall meet with in gases.</p> +<p>Another consequence of the laws of Faraday, to which, as early +as 1881, Helmholtz drew attention, may be considered as the +starting-point of certain new doctrines we shall come across +later.</p> +<p>Helmholtz says: "If we accept the hypothesis that simple bodies +are composed of atoms, we are obliged to admit that, in the same +way, electricity, whether positive or negative, is composed of +elementary parts which behave like atoms of electricity."</p> +<p>The second law seems, in fact, analogous to the law of multiple +proportions in chemistry, and it shows us that the quantities of +electricity carried vary from the simple to the double or treble, +according as it is a question of a uni-, bi-, or trivalent metal; +and as the chemical law leads up to the conception of the material +atom, so does the electrolytic law suggest the idea of an electric +atom.</p> +<hr style="width: 65%;" /> +<h3><a name="CHAPTER_VI" id="CHAPTER_VI"></a>CHAPTER VI</h3> +<h2>THE ETHER</h2> +<p class="textbold">§ 1. THE LUMINIFEROUS ETHER</p> +<p>It is in the works of Descartes that we find the first idea of +attributing those physical phenomena which the properties of matter +fail to explain to some subtle matter which is the receptacle of +the energy of the universe.</p> +<p>In our times this idea has had extraordinary luck. After having +been eclipsed for two hundred years by the success of the immortal +synthesis of Newton, it gained an entirely new splendour with +Fresnel and his followers. Thanks to their admirable discoveries, +the first stage seemed accomplished, the laws of optics were +represented by a single hypothesis, marvellously fitted to allow us +to anticipate unknown phenomena, and all these anticipations were +subsequently fully verified by experiment. But the researches of +Faraday, Maxwell, and Hertz authorized still greater ambitions; and +it really seemed that this medium, to which it was agreed to give +the ancient name of ether, and which had already explained light +and radiant heat, would also be sufficient to explain electricity. +Thus the hope began to take form that we might succeed in +demonstrating the unity of all physical forces. It was thought that +the knowledge of the laws relating to the inmost movements of this +ether might give us the key to all phenomena, and might make us +acquainted with the method in which energy is stored up, +transmitted, and parcelled out in its external manifestations.</p> +<p>We cannot study here all the problems which are connected with +the physics of the ether. To do this a complete treatise on optics +would have to be written and a very lengthy one on electricity. I +shall simply endeavour to show rapidly how in the last few years +the ideas relative to the constitution of this ether have evolved, +and we shall see if it be possible without self-delusion to imagine +that a single medium can really allow us to group all the known +facts in one comprehensive arrangement.</p> +<p>As constructed by Fresnel, the hypothesis of the luminous ether, +which had so great a struggle at the outset to overcome the +stubborn resistance of the partisans of the then classic theory of +emission, seemed, on the contrary, to possess in the sequel an +unshakable strength. Lamé, though a prudent mathematician, +wrote: "<i>The existence</i> of the ethereal fluid is +<i>incontestably demonstrated</i> by the propagation of light +through the planetary spaces, and by the explanation, so simple and +so complete, of the phenomena of diffraction in the wave theory of +light"; and he adds: "The laws of double refraction prove with no +less certainty that the <i>ether exists</i> in all diaphanous +media." Thus the ether was no longer an hypothesis, but in some +sort a tangible reality. But the ethereal fluid of which the +existence was thus proclaimed has some singular properties.</p> +<p>Were it only a question of explaining rectilinear propagation, +reflexion, refraction, diffraction, and interferences +notwithstanding grave difficulties at the outset and the objections +formulated by Laplace and Poisson (some of which, though treated +somewhat lightly at the present day, have not lost all value), we +should be under no obligation to make any hypothesis other than +that of the undulations of an elastic medium, without deciding in +advance anything as to the nature and direction of the +vibrations.</p> +<p>This medium would, naturally—since it exists in what we +call the void—be considered as imponderable. It may be +compared to a fluid of negligible mass—since it offers no +appreciable resistance to the motion of the planets—but is +endowed with an enormous elasticity, because the velocity of the +propagation of light is considerable. It must be capable of +penetrating into all transparent bodies, and of retaining there, so +to speak, a constant elasticity, but must there become condensed, +since the speed of propagation in these bodies is less than in a +vacuum. Such properties belong to no material gas, even the most +rarefied, but they admit of no essential contradiction, and that is +the important point.<a name="FNanchor_20_20" id= +"FNanchor_20_20"></a> <a href="#Footnote_20_20" class= +"fnanchor">[20]</a></p> +<p>It was the study of the phenomena of polarization which led +Fresnel to his bold conception of transverse vibrations, and +subsequently induced him to penetrate further into the constitution +of the ether. We know the experiment of Arago on the +noninterference of polarized rays in rectangular planes. While two +systems of waves, proceeding from the same source of natural light +and propagating themselves in nearly parallel directions, increase +or become destroyed according to whether the nature of the +superposed waves are of the same or of contrary signs, the waves of +the rays polarized in perpendicular planes, on the other hand, can +never interfere with each other. Whatever the difference of their +course, the intensity of the light is always the sum of the +intensity of the two rays.</p> +<p>Fresnel perceived that this experiment absolutely compels us to +reject the hypothesis of longitudinal vibrations acting along the +line of propagation in the direction of the rays. To explain it, it +must of necessity be admitted, on the contrary, that the vibrations +are transverse and perpendicular to the ray. Verdet could say, in +all truth, "It is not possible to deny the transverse direction of +luminous vibrations, without at the same time denying that light +consists of an undulatory movement."</p> +<p>Such vibrations do not and cannot exist in any medium resembling +a fluid. The characteristic of a fluid is that its different parts +can displace themselves with regard to one another without any +reaction appearing so long as a variation of volume is not +produced. There certainly may exist, as we have seen, certain +traces of rigidity in a liquid, but we cannot conceive such a thing +in a body infinitely more subtle than rarefied gas. Among material +bodies, a solid alone really possesses the rigidity sufficient for +the production within it of transverse vibrations and for their +maintenance during their propagation.</p> +<p>Since we have to attribute such a property to the ether, we may +add that on this point it resembles a solid, and Lord Kelvin has +shown that this solid, would be much more rigid than steel. This +conclusion produces great surprise in all who hear it for the first +time, and it is not rare to hear it appealed to as an argument +against the actual existence of the ether. It does not seem, +however, that such an argument can be decisive. There is no reason +for supposing that the ether ought to be a sort of extension of the +bodies we are accustomed to handle. Its properties may astonish our +ordinary way of thinking, but this rather unscientific astonishment +is not a reason for doubting its existence. Real difficulties would +appear only if we were led to attribute to the ether, not singular +properties which are seldom found united in the same substance, but +properties logically contradictory. In short, however odd such a +medium may appear to us, it cannot be said that there is any +absolute incompatibility between its attributes.</p> +<p>It would even be possible, if we wished, to suggest images +capable of representing these contrary appearances. Various authors +have done so. Thus, M. Boussinesq assumes that the ether behaves +like a very rarefied gas in respect of the celestial bodies, +because these last move, while bathed in it, in all directions and +relatively slowly, while they permit it to retain, so to speak, its +perfect homogeneity. On the other hand, its own undulations are so +rapid that so far as they are concerned the conditions become very +different, and its fluidity has, one might say, no longer the time +to come in. Hence its rigidity alone appears.</p> +<p>Another consequence, very important in principle, of the fact +that vibrations of light are transverse, has been well put in +evidence by Fresnel. He showed how we have, in order to understand +the action which excites without condensation the sliding of +successive layers of the ether during the propagation of a +vibration, to consider the vibrating medium as being composed of +molecules separated by finite distances. Certain authors, it is +true, have proposed theories in which the action at a distance of +these molecules are replaced by actions of contact between +parallelepipeds sliding over one another; but, at bottom, these two +points of view both lead us to conceive the ether as a +discontinuous medium, like matter itself. The ideas gathered from +the most recent experiments also bring us to the same +conclusion.</p> +<p><br /></p> +<p class="textbold">§ 2. RADIATIONS</p> +<p>In the ether thus constituted there are therefore propagated +transverse vibrations, regarding which all experiments in optics +furnish very precise information. The amplitude of these vibrations +is exceedingly small, even in relation to the wave-length, small as +these last are. If, in fact, the amplitude of the vibrations +acquired a noticeable value in comparison with the wave-length, the +speed of propagation should increase with the amplitude. Yet, in +spite of some curious experiments which seem to establish that the +speed of light does alter a little with its intensity, we have +reason to believe that, as regards light, the amplitude of the +oscillations in relation to the wave-length is incomparably less +than in the case of sound.</p> +<p>It has become the custom to characterise each vibration by the +path which the vibratory movement traverses during the space of a +vibration—by the length of wave, in a word—rather than +by the duration of the vibration itself. To measure wave-lengths, +the methods must be employed to which I have already alluded on the +subject of measurements of length. Professor Michelson, on the one +hand, and MM. Perot and Fabry, on the other, have devised +exceedingly ingenious processes, which have led to results of +really unhoped-for precision. The very exact knowledge also of the +speed of the propagation of light allows the duration of a +vibration to be calculated when once the wave-length is known. It +is thus found that, in the case of visible light, the number of the +vibrations from the end of the violet to the infra-red varies from +four hundred to two hundred billions per second. This gamut is not, +however, the only one the ether can give. For a long time we have +known ultra-violet radiations still more rapid, and, on the other +hand, infra-red ones more slow, while in the last few years the +field of known radiations has been singularly extended in both +directions.</p> +<p>It is to M. Rubens and his fellow-workers that are due the most +brilliant conquests in the matter of great wave-lengths. He had +remarked that, in their study, the difficulty of research proceeds +from the fact that the extreme waves of the infra-red spectrum only +contain a small part of the total energy emitted by an incandescent +body; so that if, for the purpose of study, they are further +dispersed by a prism or a grating, the intensity at any one point +becomes so slight as to be no longer observable. His original idea +was to obtain, without prism or grating, a homogeneous pencil of +great wave-length sufficiently intense to be examined. For this +purpose the radiant source used was a strip of platinum covered +with fluorine or powdered quartz, which emits numerous radiations +close to two bands of linear absorption in the absorption spectra +of fluorine and quartz, one of which is situated in the infra-red. +The radiations thus emitted are several times reflected on fluorine +or on quartz, as the case may be; and as, in proximity to the +bands, the absorption is of the order of that of metallic bodies +for luminous rays, we no longer meet in the pencil several times +reflected or in the rays <i>remaining</i> after this kind of +filtration, with any but radiations of great wave-length. Thus, for +instance, in the case of the quartz, in the neighbourhood of a +radiation corresponding to a wave-length of 8.5 microns, the +absorption is thirty times greater in the region of the band than +in the neighbouring region, and consequently, after three +reflexions, while the corresponding radiations will not have been +weakened, the neighbouring waves will be so, on the contrary, in +the proportion of 1 to 27,000.</p> +<p>With mirrors of rock salt and of sylvine<a name="FNanchor_21_21" +id="FNanchor_21_21"></a><a href="#Footnote_21_21" class= +"fnanchor">[21]</a> there have been obtained, by taking an +incandescent gas light (Auer) as source, radiations extending as +far as 70 microns; and these last are the greatest wave-lengths +observed in optical phenomena. These radiations are largely +absorbed by the vapour of water, and it is no doubt owing to this +absorption that they are not found in the solar spectrum. On the +other hand, they easily pass through gutta-percha, india-rubber, +and insulating substances in general.</p> +<p>At the opposite end of the spectrum the knowledge of the +ultra-violet regions has been greatly extended by the researches of +Lenard. These extremely rapid radiations have been shown by that +eminent physicist to occur in the light of the electric sparks +which flash between two metal points, and which are produced by a +large induction coil with condenser and a Wehnelt break. Professor +Schumann has succeeded in photographing them by depositing bromide +of silver directly on glass plates without fixing it with gelatine; +and he has, by the same process, photographed in the spectrum of +hydrogen a ray with a wave-length of only 0.1 micron.</p> +<p>The spectroscope was formed entirely of fluor-spar, and a vacuum +had been created in it, for these radiations are extremely +absorbable by the air.</p> +<p>Notwithstanding the extreme smallness of the luminous +wave-lengths, it has been possible, after numerous fruitless +trials, to obtain stationary waves analogous to those which, in the +case of sound, are produced in organ pipes. The marvellous +application M. Lippmann has made of these waves to completely solve +the problem of photography in colours is well known. This +discovery, so important in itself and so instructive, since it +shows us how the most delicate anticipations of theory may be +verified in all their consequences, and lead the physicist to the +solution of the problems occurring in practice, has justly become +popular, and there is, therefore, no need to describe it here in +detail.</p> +<p>Professor Wiener obtained stationary waves some little while +before M. Lippmann's discovery, in a layer of a sensitive substance +having a grain sufficiently small in relation to the length of +wave. His aim was to solve a question of great importance to a +complete knowledge of the ether. Fresnel founded his theory of +double refraction and reflexion by transparent surfaces, on the +hypothesis that the vibration of a ray of polarized light is +perpendicular to the plane of polarization. But Neumann has +proposed, on the contrary, a theory in which he recognizes that the +luminous vibration is in this very plane. He rather supposes, in +opposition to Fresnel's idea, that the density of the ether remains +the same in all media, while its coefficient of elasticity is +variable.</p> +<p>Very remarkable experiments on dispersion by M. Carvallo prove +indeed that the idea of Fresnel was, if not necessary for us to +adopt, at least the more probable of the two; but apart from this +indication, and contrary to the hypothesis of Neumann, the two +theories, from the point of view of the explanation of all known +facts, really appear to be equivalent. Are we then in presence of +two mechanical explanations, different indeed, but nevertheless +both adaptable to all the facts, and between which it will always +be impossible to make a choice? Or, on the contrary, shall we +succeed in realising an <i>experimentum crucis</i>, an experiment +at the point where the two theories cross, which will definitely +settle the question?</p> +<p>Professor Wiener thought he could draw from his experiment a +firm conclusion on the point in dispute. He produced stationary +waves with light polarized at an angle of 45°,<a name= +"FNanchor_22_22" id="FNanchor_22_22"></a><a href="#Footnote_22_22" +class="fnanchor">[22]</a> and established that, when light is +polarized in the plane of incidence, the fringes persist; but that, +on the other hand, they disappear when the light is polarized +perpendicularly to this plane. If it be admitted that a +photographic impression results from the active force of the +vibratory movement of the ether, the question is, in fact, +completely elucidated, and the discrepancy is abolished in +Fresnel's favour.</p> +<p>M.H. Poincaré has pointed out, however, that we know +nothing as to the mechanism of the photographic impression. We +cannot consider it evident that it is the kinetic energy of the +ether which produces the decomposition of the sensitive salt; and +if, on the contrary, we suppose it to be due to the potential +energy, all the conclusions are reversed, and Neumann's idea +triumphs.</p> +<p>Recently a very clever physicist, M. Cotton, especially known +for his skilful researches in the domain of optics, has taken up +anew the study of stationary waves. He has made very precise +quantitative experiments, and has demonstrated, in his turn, that +it is impossible, even with spherical waves, to succeed in +determining on which of the two vectors which have to be regarded +in all theories of light on the subject of polarization phenomena +the luminous intensity and the chemical action really depend. This +question, therefore, no longer exists for those physicists who +admit that luminous vibrations are electrical oscillations. +Whatever, then, the hypothesis formed, whether it be electric force +or, on the contrary, magnetic force which we place in the plane of +polarization, the mode of propagation foreseen will always be in +accord with the facts observed.</p> +<p><br /></p> +<p class="textbold">§ 3. THE ELECTROMAGNETIC ETHER</p> +<p>The idea of attributing the phenomena of electricity to +perturbations produced in the medium which transmits the light is +already of old standing; and the physicists who witnessed the +triumph of Fresnel's theories could not fail to conceive that this +fluid, which fills the whole of space and penetrates into all +bodies, might also play a preponderant part in electrical actions. +Some even formed too hasty hypotheses on this point; for the hour +had not arrived when it was possible to place them on a +sufficiently sound basis, and the known facts were not numerous +enough to give the necessary precision.</p> +<p>The founders of modern electricity also thought it wiser to +adopt, with regard to this science, the attitude taken by Newton in +connection with gravitation: "In the first place to observe facts, +to vary the circumstances of these as much as possible, to +accompany this first work by precise measurements in order to +deduce from them general laws founded solely on experiment, and to +deduce from these laws, independently of all hypotheses on the +nature of the forces producing the phenomena, the mathematical +value of these forces—that is to say, the formula +representing them. Such was the system pursued by Newton. It has, +in general, been adopted in France by the scholars to whom physics +owe the great progress made of late years, and it has served as my +guide in all my researches on electrodynamic phenomena.... It is +for this reason that I have avoided speaking of the ideas I may +have on the nature of the cause of the force emanating from voltaic +conductors."</p> +<p>Thus did Ampère express himself. The illustrious +physicist rightly considered the results obtained by him through +following this wise method as worthy of comparison with the laws of +attraction; but he knew that when this first halting-place was +reached there was still further to go, and that the evolution of +ideas must necessarily continue.</p> +<p>"With whatever physical cause," he adds, "we may wish to connect +the phenomena produced by electro-dynamic action, the formula I +have obtained will always remain the expression of the facts," and +he explicitly indicated that if one could succeed in deducing his +formula from the consideration of the vibrations of a fluid +distributed through space, an enormous step would have been taken +in this department of physics. He added, however, that this +research appeared to him premature, and would change nothing in the +results of his work, since, to accord with facts, the hypothesis +adopted would always have to agree with the formula which exactly +represents them.</p> +<p>It is not devoid of interest to observe that Ampère +himself, notwithstanding his caution, really formed some +hypotheses, and recognized that electrical phenomena were governed +by the laws of mechanics. Yet the principles of Newton then +appeared to be unshakable.</p> +<p>Faraday was the first to demonstrate, by clear experiment, the +influence of the media in electricity and magnetic phenomena, and +he attributed this influence to certain modifications in the ether +which these media enclose. His fundamental conception was to reject +action at a distance, and to localize in the ether the energy whose +evolution is the cause of the actions manifested, as, for example, +in the discharge of a condenser.</p> +<p>Consider the barrel of a pump placed in a vacuum and closed by a +piston at each end, and let us introduce between these a certain +mass of air. The two pistons, through the elastic force of the gas, +repel each other with a force which, according to the law of +Mariotte, varies in inverse ratio to the distance. The method +favoured by Ampère would first of all allow this law of +repulsion between the two pistons to be discovered, even if the +existence of a gas enclosed in the barrel of the pump were +unsuspected; and it would then be natural to localize the potential +energy of the system on the surface of the two pistons. But if the +phenomenon is more carefully examined, we shall discover the +presence of the air, and we shall understand that every part of the +volume of this air could, if it were drawn off into a recipient of +equal volume, carry away with it a fraction of the energy of the +system, and that consequently this energy belongs really to the air +and not to the pistons, which are there solely for the purpose of +enabling this energy to manifest its existence.</p> +<p>Faraday made, in some sort, an equivalent discovery when he +perceived that the electrical energy belongs, not to the coatings +of the condenser, but to the dielectric which separates them. His +audacious views revealed to him a new world, but to explore this +world a surer and more patient method was needed.</p> +<p>Maxwell succeeded in stating with precision certain points of +Faraday's ideas, and he gave them the mathematical form which, +often wrongly, impresses physicists, but which when it exactly +encloses a theory, is a certain proof that this theory is at least +coherent and logical.<a name="FNanchor_23_23" id= +"FNanchor_23_23"></a> <a href="#Footnote_23_23" class= +"fnanchor">[23]</a></p> +<p>The work of Maxwell is over-elaborated, complex, difficult to +read, and often ill-understood, even at the present day. Maxwell is +more concerned in discovering whether it is possible to give an +explanation of electrical and magnetic phenomena which shall be +founded on the mechanical properties of a single medium, than in +stating this explanation in precise terms. He is aware that if we +could succeed in constructing such an interpretation, it would be +easy to propose an infinity of others, entirely equivalent from the +point of view of the experimentally verifiable consequences; and +his especial ambition is therefore to extract from the premises a +general view, and to place in evidence something which would remain +the common property of all the theories.</p> +<p>He succeeded in showing that if the electrostatic energy of an +electromagnetic field be considered to represent potential energy, +and its electrodynamic the kinetic energy, it becomes possible to +satisfy both the principle of least action and that of the +conservation of energy; from that moment—if we eliminate a +few difficulties which exist regarding the stability of the +solutions—the possibility of finding mechanical explanations +of electromagnetic phenomena must be considered as demonstrated. He +thus succeeded, moreover, in stating precisely the notion of two +electric and magnetic fields which are produced in all points of +space, and which are strictly inter-connected, since the variation +of the one immediately and compulsorily gives birth to the +other.</p> +<p>From this hypothesis he deduced that, in the medium where this +energy is localized, an electromagnetic wave is propagated with a +velocity equal to the relation of the units of electric mass in the +electromagnetic and electrostatic systems. Now, experiments made +known since his time have proved that this relation is numerically +equal to the speed of light, and the more precise experiments made +in consequence—among which should be cited the particularly +careful ones of M. Max Abraham—have only rendered the +coincidence still more complete.</p> +<p>It is natural henceforth to suppose that this medium is +identical with the luminous ether, and that a luminous wave is an +electromagnetic wave—that is to say, a succession of +alternating currents, which exist in the dielectric and even in the +void, and possess an enormous frequency, inasmuch as they change +their direction thousands of billions of times per second, and by +reason of this frequency produce considerable induction effects. +Maxwell did not admit the existence of open currents. To his mind, +therefore, an electrical vibration could not produce condensations +of electricity. It was, in consequence, necessarily transverse, and +thus coincided with the vibration of Fresnel; while the +corresponding magnetic vibration was perpendicular to it, and would +coincide with the luminous vibration of Neumann.</p> +<p>Maxwell's theory thus establishes a close correlation between +the phenomena of the luminous and those of the electromagnetic +waves, or, we might even say, the complete identity of the two. But +it does not follow from this that we ought to regard the variation +of an electric field produced at some one point as necessarily +consisting of a real displacement of the ether round that point. +The idea of thus bringing electrical phenomena back to the +mechanics of the ether is not, then, forced upon us, and the +contrary idea even seems more probable. It is not the optics of +Fresnel which absorbs the science of electricity, it is rather the +optics which is swallowed up by a more general theory. The attempts +of popularizers who endeavour to represent, in all their details, +the mechanism of the electric phenomena, thus appear vain enough, +and even puerile. It is useless to find out to what material body +the ether may be compared, if we content ourselves with seeing in +it a medium of which, at every point, two vectors define the +properties.</p> +<p>For a long time, therefore, we could remark that the theory of +Fresnel simply supposed a medium in which something periodical was +propagated, without its being necessary to admit this something to +be a movement; but we had to wait not only for Maxwell, but also +for Hertz, before this idea assumed a really scientific shape. +Hertz insisted on the fact that the six equations of the electric +field permit all the phenomena to be anticipated without its being +necessary to construct one hypothesis or another, and he put these +equations into a very symmetrical form, which brings completely in +evidence the perfect reciprocity between electrical and magnetic +actions. He did yet more, for he brought to the ideas of Maxwell +the most striking confirmation by his memorable researches on +electric oscillations.</p> +<p><br /></p> +<p class="textbold">§ 4. ELECTRICAL OSCILLATIONS</p> +<p>The experiments of Hertz are well known. We know how the Bonn +physicist developed, by means of oscillating electric discharges, +displacement currents and induction effects in the whole of the +space round the spark-gap; and how he excited by induction at some +point in a wire a perturbation which afterwards is propagated along +the wire, and how a resonator enabled him to detect the effect +produced.</p> +<p>The most important point made evident by the observation of +interference phenomena and subsequently verified directly by M. +Blondlot, is that the electromagnetic perturbation is propagated +with the speed of light, and this result condemns for ever all the +hypotheses which fail to attribute any part to the intervening +media in the propagation of an induction phenomenon.</p> +<p>If the inducing action were, in fact, to operate directly +between the inducing and the induced circuits, the propagation +should be instantaneous; for if an interval were to occur between +the moment when the cause acted and the one when the effect was +produced, during this interval there would no longer be anything +anywhere, since the intervening medium does not come into play, and +the phenomenon would then disappear.</p> +<p>Leaving on one side the manifold but purely electrical +consequences of this and the numerous researches relating to the +production or to the properties of the waves—some of which, +those of MM. Sarrazin and de la Rive, Righi, Turpain, Lebedeff, +Decombe, Barbillon, Drude, Gutton, Lamotte, Lecher, etc., are, +however, of the highest order—I shall only mention here the +studies more particularly directed to the establishment of the +identity of the electromagnetic and the luminous waves.</p> +<p>The only differences which subsist are necessarily those due to +the considerable discrepancy which exists between the durations of +the periods of these two categories of waves. The length of wave +corresponding to the first spark-gap of Hertz was about 6 metres, +and the longest waves perceptible by the retina are 7/10 of a +micron.<a name="FNanchor_24_24" id="FNanchor_24_24"></a> <a href= +"#Footnote_24_24" class="fnanchor">[24]</a></p> +<p>These radiations are so far apart that it is not astonishing +that their properties have not a perfect similitude. Thus phenomena +like those of diffraction, which are negligible in the ordinary +conditions under which light is observed, may here assume a +preponderating importance. To play the part, for example, with the +Hertzian waves, which a mirror 1 millimetre square plays with +regard to light, would require a colossal mirror which would attain +the size of a myriametre<a name="FNanchor_25_25" id= +"FNanchor_25_25"></a> <a href="#Footnote_25_25" class= +"fnanchor">[25]</a> square.</p> +<p>The efforts of physicists have to-day, however, filled up, in +great part, this interval, and from both banks at once they have +laboured to build a bridge between the two domains. We have seen +how Rubens showed us calorific rays 60 metres long; on the other +hand, MM. Lecher, Bose, and Lampa have succeeded, one after the +other, in gradually obtaining oscillations with shorter and shorter +periods. There have been produced, and are now being studied, +electromagnetic waves of four millimetres; and the gap subsisting +in the spectrum between the rays left undetected by sylvine and the +radiations of M. Lampa now hardly comprise more than five +octaves—that is to say, an interval perceptibly equal to that +which separates the rays observed by M. Rubens from the last which +are evident to the eye.</p> +<p>The analogy then becomes quite close, and in the remaining rays +the properties, so to speak, characteristic of the Hertzian waves, +begin to appear. For these waves, as we have seen, the most +transparent bodies are the most perfect electrical insulators; +while bodies still slightly conducting are entirely opaque. The +index of refraction of these substances tends in the case of great +wave-lengths to become, as the theory anticipates, nearly the +square root of the dielectric constant.</p> +<p>MM. Rubens and Nichols have even produced with the waves which +remain phenomena of electric resonance quite similar to those which +an Italian scholar, M. Garbasso, obtained with electric waves. This +physicist showed that, if the electric waves are made to impinge on +a flat wooden stand, on which are a series of resonators parallel +to each other and uniformly arranged, these waves are hardly +reflected save in the case where the resonators have the same +period as the spark-gap. If the remaining rays are allowed to fall +on a glass plate silvered and divided by a diamond fixed on a +dividing machine into small rectangles of equal dimensions, there +will be observed variations in the reflecting power according to +the orientation of the rectangles, under conditions entirely +comparable with the experiment of Garbasso.</p> +<p>In order that the phenomenon be produced it is necessary that +the remaining waves should be previously polarized. This is +because, in fact, the mechanism employed to produce the electric +oscillations evidently gives out vibrations which occur on a single +plane and are subsequently polarized.</p> +<p>We cannot therefore entirely assimilate a radiation proceeding +from a spark-gap to a ray of natural light. For the synthesis of +light to be realized, still other conditions must be complied with. +During a luminous impression, the direction and the phase change +millions of times in the vibration sensible to the retina, yet the +damping of this vibration is very slow. With the Hertzian +oscillations all these conditions are changed—the damping is +very rapid but the direction remains invariable.</p> +<p>Every time, however, that we deal with general phenomena which +are independent of these special conditions, the parallelism is +perfect; and with the waves, we have put in evidence the reflexion, +refraction, total reflexion, double reflexion, rotatory +polarization, dispersion, and the ordinary interferences produced +by rays travelling in the same direction and crossing each other at +a very acute angle, or the interferences analogous to those which +Wiener observed with rays of the contrary direction.</p> +<p>A very important consequence of the electromagnetic theory +foreseen by Maxwell is that the luminous waves which fall on a +surface must exercise on this surface a pressure equal to the +radiant energy which exists in the unit of volume of the +surrounding space. M. Lebedeff a few years ago allowed a sheaf of +rays from an arc lamp to fall on a deflection radiometer,<a name= +"FNanchor_26_26" id="FNanchor_26_26"></a> <a href="#Footnote_26_26" +class="fnanchor">[26]</a> and thus succeeded in revealing the +existence of this pressure. Its value is sufficient, in the case of +matter of little density and finely divided, to reduce and even +change into repulsion the attractive action exercised on bodies by +the sun. This is a fact formerly conjectured by Faye, and must +certainly play a great part in the deformation of the heads of +comets.</p> +<p>More recently, MM. Nichols and Hull have undertaken experiments +on this point. They have measured not only the pressure, but also +the energy of the radiation by means of a special bolometer. They +have thus arrived at numerical verifications which are entirely in +conformity with the calculations of Maxwell.</p> +<p>The existence of these pressures may be otherwise foreseen even +apart from the electromagnetic theory, by adding to the theory of +undulations the principles of thermodynamics. Bartoli, and more +recently Dr Larmor, have shown, in fact, that if these pressures +did not exist, it would be possible, without any other phenomenon, +to pass heat from a cold into a warm body, and thus transgress the +principle of Carnot.</p> +<p><br /></p> +<p class="textbold">§ 5. THE X RAYS</p> +<p>It appears to-day quite probable that the X rays should be +classed among the phenomena which have their seat in the luminous +ether. Doubtless it is not necessary to recall here how, in +December 1895, Röntgen, having wrapped in black paper a +Crookes tube in action, observed that a fluorescent platinocyanide +of barium screen placed in the neighbourhood, had become visible in +the dark, and that a photographic plate had received an impress. +The rays which come from the tube, in conditions now well known, +are not deviated by a magnet, and, as M. Curie and M. Sagnac have +conclusively shown, they carry no electric charge. They are subject +to neither reflection nor refraction, and very precise and very +ingenious measurements by M. Gouy have shown that, in their case, +the refraction index of the various bodies cannot be more than a +millionth removed from unity.</p> +<p>We knew from the outset that there existed various X rays +differing from each other as, for instance, the colours of the +spectrum, and these are distinguished from each other by their +unequal power of passing through substances. M. Sagnac, +particularly, has shown that there can be obtained a gradually +decreasing scale of more or less absorbable rays, so that the +greater part of their photographic action is stopped by a simple +sheet of black paper. These rays figure among the secondary rays +discovered, as is known, by this ingenious physicist. The X rays +falling on matter are thus subjected to transformations which may +be compared to those which the phenomena of luminescence produce on +the ultra-violet rays.</p> +<p>M. Benoist has founded on the transparency of matter to the rays +a sure and practical method of allowing them to be distinguished, +and has thus been enabled to define a specific character analogous +to the colour of the rays of light. It is probable also that the +different rays do not transport individually the same quantity of +energy. We have not yet obtained on this point precise results, but +it is roughly known, since the experiments of MM. Rutherford and +M'Clung, what quantity of energy corresponds to a pencil of X rays. +These physicists have found that this quantity would be, on an +average, five hundred times larger than that brought by an +analogous pencil of solar light to the surface of the earth. What +is the nature of this energy? The question does not appear to have +been yet solved.</p> +<p>It certainly appears, according to Professors Haga and Wind and +to Professor Sommerfeld, that with the X rays curious experiments +of diffraction may be produced. Dr Barkla has shown also that they +can manifest true polarization. The secondary rays emitted by a +metallic surface when struck by X rays vary, in fact, in intensity +when the position of the plane of incidence round the primary +pencil is changed. Various physicists have endeavoured to measure +the speed of propagation, but it seems more and more probable that +it is very nearly that of light.<a name="FNanchor_27_27" id= +"FNanchor_27_27"></a><a href="#Footnote_27_27" class= +"fnanchor">[27]</a></p> +<p>I must here leave out the description of a crowd of other +experiments. Some very interesting researches by M. Brunhes, M. +Broca, M. Colardeau, M. Villard, in France, and by many others +abroad, have permitted the elucidation of several interesting +problems relative to the duration of the emission or to the best +disposition to be adopted for the production of the rays. The only +point which will detain us is the important question as to the +nature of the X rays themselves; the properties which have just +been brought to mind are those which appear essential and which +every theory must reckon with.</p> +<p>The most natural hypothesis would be to consider the rays as +ultra-violet radiations of very short wave-length, or radiations +which are in a manner ultra-ultra-violet. This interpretation can +still, at this present moment, be maintained, and the researches of +MM. Buisson, Righi, Lenard, and Merrit Stewart have even +established that rays of very short wave-lengths produce on +metallic conductors, from the point of view of electrical +phenomena, effects quite analogous to those of the X rays. Another +resemblance results also from the experiments by which M. Perreau +established that these rays act on the electric resistance of +selenium. New and valuable arguments have thus added force to those +who incline towards a theory which has the merit of bringing a new +phenomenon within the pale of phenomena previously known.</p> +<p>Nevertheless the shortest ultra-violet radiations, such as those +of M. Schumann, are still capable of refraction by quartz, and this +difference constitutes, in the minds of many physicists, a serious +enough reason to decide them to reject the more simple hypothesis. +Moreover, the rays of Schumann are, as we have seen, +extraordinarily absorbable,—so much so that they have to be +observed in a vacuum. The most striking property of the X rays is, +on the contrary, the facility with which they pass through +obstacles, and it is impossible not to attach considerable +importance to such a difference.</p> +<p>Some attribute this marvellous radiation to longitudinal +vibrations, which, as M. Duhem has shown, would be propagated in +dielectric media with a speed equal to that of light. But the most +generally accepted idea is the one formulated from the first by Sir +George Stokes and followed up by Professor Wiechert. According to +this theory the X rays should be due to a succession of independent +pulsations of the ether, starting from the points where the +molecules projected by the cathode of the Crookes tube meet the +anticathode. These pulsations are not continuous vibrations like +the radiations of the spectrum; they are isolated and extremely +short; they are, besides, transverse, like the undulations of +light, and the theory shows that they must be propagated with the +speed of light. They should present neither refraction nor +reflection, but, under certain conditions, they may be subject to +the phenomena of diffraction. All these characteristics are found +in the Röntgen rays.</p> +<p>Professor J.J. Thomson adopts an analogous idea, and states the +precise way in which the pulsations may be produced at the moment +when the electrified particles forming the cathode rays suddenly +strike the anticathode wall. The electromagnetic induction behaves +in such a way that the magnetic field is not annihilated when the +particle stops, and the new field produced, which is no longer in +equilibrium, is propagated in the dielectric like an electric +pulsation. The electric and magnetic pulsations excited by this +mechanism may give birth to effects similar to those of light. +Their slight amplitude, however, is the cause of there here being +neither refraction nor diffraction phenomena, save in very special +conditions. If the cathode particle is not stopped in zero time, +the pulsation will take a greater amplitude, and be, in +consequence, more easily absorbable; to this is probably to be +attributed the differences which may exist between different tubes +and different rays.</p> +<p>It is right to add that some authors, notwithstanding the proved +impossibility of deviating them in a magnetic field, have not +renounced the idea of comparing them with the cathode rays. They +suppose, for instance, that the rays are formed by electrons +animated with so great a velocity that their inertia, conformably +with theories which I shall examine later, no longer permit them to +be stopped in their course; this is, for instance, the theory +upheld by Mr Sutherland. We know, too, that to M. Gustave Le Bon +they represent the extreme limit of material things, one of the +last stages before the vanishing of matter on its return to the +ether.</p> +<p>Everyone has heard of the N rays, whose name recalls the town of +Nancy, where they were discovered. In some of their singular +properties they are akin to the X rays, while in others they are +widely divergent from them.</p> +<p>M. Blondlot, one of the masters of contemporary physics, deeply +respected by all who know him, admired by everyone for the +penetration of his mind, and the author of works remarkable for the +originality and sureness of his method, discovered them in +radiations emitted from various sources, such as the sun, an +incandescent light, a Nernst lamp, and even bodies previously +exposed to the sun's rays. The essential property which allows them +to be revealed is their action on a small induction spark, of which +they increase the brilliancy; this phenomenon is visible to the eye +and is rendered objective by photography.</p> +<p>Various other physicists and numbers of physiologists, following +the path opened by M. Blondlot, published during 1903 and 1904 +manifold but often rather hasty memoirs, in which they related the +results of their researches, which do not appear to have been +always conducted with the accuracy desirable. These results were +most strange; they seemed destined to revolutionise whole regions +not only of the domain of physics, but likewise of the biological +sciences. Unfortunately the method of observation was always +founded on the variations in visibility of the spark or of a +phosphorescent substance, and it soon became manifest that these +variations were not perceptible to all eyes.</p> +<p>No foreign experimenter has succeeded in repeating the +experiments, while in France many physicists have failed; and hence +the question has much agitated public opinion. Are we face to face +with a very singular case of suggestion, or is special training and +particular dispositions required to make the phenomenon apparent? +It is not possible, at the present moment, to declare the problem +solved; but very recent experiments by M. Gutton and a note by M. +Mascart have reanimated the confidence of those who hoped that such +a scholar as M. Blondlot could not have been deluded by +appearances. However, these last proofs in favour of the existence +of the rays have themselves been contested, and have not succeeded +in bringing conviction to everyone.</p> +<p>It seems very probable indeed that certain of the most singular +conclusions arrived at by certain authors on the subject will lapse +into deserved oblivion. But negative experiments prove nothing in a +case like this, and the fact that most experimenters have failed +where M. Blondlot and his pupils have succeeded may constitute a +presumption, but cannot be regarded as a demonstrative argument. +Hence we must still wait; it is exceedingly possible that the +illustrious physicist of Nancy may succeed in discovering objective +actions of the N rays which shall be indisputable, and may thus +establish on a firm basis a discovery worthy of those others which +have made his name so justly celebrated.</p> +<p>According to M. Blondlot the N rays can be polarised, refracted, +and dispersed, while they have wavelengths comprised within .0030 +micron, and .0760 micron—that is to say, between an eighth +and a fifth of that found for the extreme ultra-violet rays. They +might be, perhaps, simply rays of a very short period. Their +existence, stripped of the parasitical and somewhat singular +properties sought to be attributed to them, would thus appear +natural enough. It would, moreover, be extremely important, and +lead, no doubt, to most curious applications; it can be conceived, +in fact, that such rays might serve to reveal what occurs in those +portions of matter whose too minute dimensions escape microscopic +examination on account of the phenomena of diffraction.</p> +<p>From whatever point of view we look at it, and whatever may be +the fate of the discovery, the history of the N rays is +particularly instructive, and must give food for reflection to +those interested in questions of scientific methods.</p> +<p><br /></p> +<p class="textbold">§ 6. THE ETHER AND GRAVITATION</p> +<p>The striking success of the hypothesis of the ether in optics +has, in our own days, strengthened the hope of being able to +explain, by an analogous representation, the action of +gravitation.</p> +<p>For a long time, philosophers who rejected the idea that +ponderability is a primary and essential quality of all bodies have +sought to reduce their weight to pressures exercised in a very +subtle fluid. This was the conception of Descartes, and was perhaps +the true idea of Newton himself. Newton points out, in many +passages, that the laws he had discovered were independent of the +hypotheses that could be formed on the way in which universal +attraction was produced, but that with sufficient experiments the +true cause of this attraction might one day be reached. In the +preface to the second edition of the Optics he writes: "To prove +that I have not considered weight as a universal property of +bodies, I have added a question as to its cause, preferring this +form of question because my interpretation does not entirely +satisfy me in the absence of experiment"; and he puts the question +in this shape: "Is not this medium (the ether) more rarefied in the +interior of dense bodies like the sun, the planets, the comets, +than in the empty spaces which separate them? Passing from these +bodies to great distances, does it not become continually denser, +and in that way does it not produce the weight of these great +bodies with regard to each other and of their parts with regard to +these bodies, each body tending to leave the most dense for the +most rarefied parts?"</p> +<p>Evidently this view is incomplete, but we may endeavour to state +it precisely. If we admit that this medium, the properties of which +would explain the attraction, is the same as the luminous ether, we +may first ask ourselves whether the action of gravitation is itself +also due to oscillations. Some authors have endeavoured to found a +theory on this hypothesis, but we are immediately brought face to +face with very serious difficulties. Gravity appears, in fact, to +present quite exceptional characteristics. No agent, not even those +which depend upon the ether, such as light and electricity, has any +influence on its action or its direction. All bodies are, so to +speak, absolutely transparent to universal attraction, and no +experiment has succeeded in demonstrating that its propagation is +not instantaneous. From various astronomical observations, Laplace +concluded that its velocity, in any case, must exceed fifty million +times that of light. It is subject neither to reflection nor to +refraction; it is independent of the structure of bodies; and not +only is it inexhaustible, but also (as is pointed out, according to +M. Hannequin, by an English scholar, James Croll) the distribution +of the effects of the attracting force of a mass over the manifold +particles which may successively enter the field of its action in +no way diminishes the attraction it exercises on each of them +respectively, a thing which is seen nowhere else in nature.</p> +<p>Nevertheless it is possible, by means of certain hypotheses, to +construct interpretations whereby the appropriate movements of an +elastic medium should explain the facts clearly enough. But these +movements are very complex, and it seems almost inconceivable that +the same medium could possess simultaneously the state of movement +corresponding to the transmission of a luminous phenomenon and that +constantly imposed on it by the transmission of gravitation.</p> +<p>Another celebrated hypothesis was devised by Lesage, of Geneva. +Lesage supposed space to be overrun in all directions by currents +of <i>ultramundane</i> corpuscles. This hypothesis, contested by +Maxwell, is interesting. It might perhaps be taken up again in our +days, and it is not impossible that the assimilation of these +corpuscles to electrons might give a satisfactory image. <a name= +"FNanchor_28_28" id="FNanchor_28_28"></a> <a href="#Footnote_28_28" +class="fnanchor">[28]</a></p> +<p>M. Crémieux has recently undertaken experiments directed, +as he thinks, to showing that the divergences between the phenomena +of gravitation and all the other phenomena in nature are more +apparent than real. Thus the evolution in the heart of the ether of +a quantity of gravific energy would not be entirely isolated, and +as in the case of all evolutions of all energy of whatever kind, it +should provoke a partial transformation into energy of a different +form. Thus again the liberated energy of gravitation would vary +when passing from one material to another, as from gases into +liquids, or from one liquid to a different one.</p> +<p>On this last point the researches of M. Crémieux have +given affirmative results: if we immerse in a large mass of some +liquid several drops of another not miscible with the first, but of +identical density, we form a mass representing no doubt a +discontinuity in the ether, and we may ask ourselves whether, in +conformity with what happens in all other phenomena of nature, this +discontinuity has not a tendency to disappear.</p> +<p>If we abide by the ordinary consequences of the Newtonian theory +of potential, the drops should remain motionless, the hydrostatic +impulsion forming an exact equilibrium to their mutual attraction. +Now M. Crémieux remarks that, as a matter of fact, they +slowly approach each other.</p> +<p>Such experiments are very delicate; and with all the precautions +taken by the author, it cannot yet be asserted that he has removed +all possibility of the action of the phenomena of capillarity nor +all possible errors proceeding from extremely slight differences of +temperature. But the attempt is interesting and deserves to be +followed up.</p> +<p>Thus, the hypothesis of the ether does not yet explain all the +phenomena which the considerations relating to matter are of +themselves powerless to interpret. If we wished to represent to +ourselves, by the mechanical properties of a medium filling the +whole of the universe, all luminous, electric, and gravitation +phenomena, we should be led to attribute to this medium very +strange and almost contradictory characteristics; and yet it would +be still more inconceivable that this medium should be double or +treble, that there should be two or three ethers each occupying +space as if it were alone, and interpenetrating it without +exercising any action on one another. We are thus brought, by a +close examination of facts, rather to the idea that the properties +of the ether are not wholly reducible to the rules of ordinary +mechanics.</p> +<p>The physicist has therefore not yet succeeded in answering the +question often put to him by the philosopher: "Has the ether really +an objective existence?" However, it is not necessary to know the +answer in order to utilize the ether. In its ideal properties we +find the means of determining the form of equations which are +valid, and to the learned detached from all metaphysical +prepossession this is the essential point.</p> +<hr style="width: 65%;" /> +<h3><a name="CHAPTER_VII" id="CHAPTER_VII"></a>CHAPTER VII</h3> +<h2>A CHAPTER IN THE HISTORY OF SCIENCE:<br /> +WIRELESS TELEGRAPHY</h2> +<p class="textbold">§ 1</p> +<p>I have endeavoured in this book to set forth impartially the +ideas dominant at this moment in the domain of physics, and to make +known the facts essential to them. I have had to quote the authors +of the principal discoveries in order to be able to class and, in +some sort, to name these discoveries; but I in no way claim to +write even a summary history of the physics of the day.</p> +<p>I am not unaware that, as has often been said, contemporary +history is the most difficult of all histories to write. A certain +step backwards seems necessary in order to enable us to appreciate +correctly the relative importance of events, and details conceal +the full view from eyes which are too close to them, as the trees +prevent us from seeing the forest. The event which produces a great +sensation has often only insignificant consequences; while another, +which seemed at the outset of the least importance and little +worthy of note, has in the long run a widespread and deep +influence.</p> +<p>If, however, we deal with the history of a positive discovery, +contemporaries who possess immediate information, and are in a +position to collect authentic evidence at first hand, will make, by +bringing to it their sincere testimony, a work of erudition which +may be very useful, but which we may be tempted to look upon as +very easy of execution. Yet such a labour, even when limited to the +study of a very minute question or of a recent invention, is far +from being accomplished without the historian stumbling over +serious obstacles.</p> +<p>An invention is never, in reality, to be attributed to a single +author. It is the result of the work of many collaborators who +sometimes have no acquaintance with one another, and is often the +fruit of obscure labours. Public opinion, however, wilfully simple +in face of a sensational discovery, insists that the historian +should also act as judge; and it is the historian's task to +disentangle the truth in the midst of the contest, and to declare +infallibly to whom the acknowledgments of mankind should be paid. +He must, in his capacity as skilled expert, expose piracies, detect +the most carefully hidden plagiarisms, and discuss the delicate +question of priority; while he must not be deluded by those who do +not fear to announce, in bold accents, that they have solved +problems of which they find the solution imminent, and who, the day +after its final elucidation by third parties, proclaim themselves +its true discoverers. He must rise above a partiality which deems +itself excusable because it proceeds from national pride; and, +finally, he must seek with patience for what has gone before. While +thus retreating step by step he runs the risk of losing himself in +the night of time.</p> +<p>An example of yesterday seems to show the difficulties of such a +task. Among recent discoveries the invention of wireless telegraphy +is one of those which have rapidly become popular, and looks, as it +were, an exact subject clearly marked out. Many attempts have +already been made to write its history. Mr J.J. Fahie published in +England as early as 1899 an interesting work entitled the +<i>History of Wireless Telegraphy</i>; and about the same time M. +Broca published in France a very exhaustive work named <i>La +Telegraphie sans fil</i>. Among the reports presented to the +Congrès international de physique (Paris, 1900), Signor +Righi, an illustrious Italian scholar, whose personal efforts have +largely contributed to the invention of the present system of +telegraphy, devoted a chapter, short, but sufficiently complete, of +his masterly report on Hertzian waves, to the history of wireless +telegraphy. The same author, in association with Herr Bernhard +Dessau, has likewise written a more important work, <i>Die +Telegraphie ohne Draht</i>; and <i>La Telegraphie sans fil et les +ondes Électriques</i> of MM. J. Boulanger and G. +Ferrié may also be consulted with advantage, as may <i>La +Telegraphie sans fil</i> of Signor Dominico Mazotto. Quite recently +Mr A. Story has given us in a little volume called <i>The Story of +Wireless Telegraphy</i>, a condensed but very precise +recapitulation of all the attempts which have been made to +establish telegraphic communication without the intermediary of a +conducting wire. Mr Story has examined many documents, has +sometimes brought curious facts to light, and has studied even the +most recently adopted apparatus.</p> +<p>It may be interesting, by utilising the information supplied by +these authors and supplementing them when necessary by others, to +trace the sources of this modern discovery, to follow its +developments, and thus to prove once more how much a matter, most +simple in appearance, demands extensive and complex researches on +the part of an author desirous of writing a definitive work.</p> +<p><br /></p> +<p class="textbold">§ 2</p> +<p>The first, and not the least difficulty, is to clearly define +the subject. The words "wireless telegraphy," which at first seem +to correspond to a simple and perfectly clear idea, may in reality +apply to two series of questions, very different in the mind of a +physicist, between which it is important to distinguish. The +transmission of signals demands three organs which all appear +indispensable: the transmitter, the receiver, and, between the two, +an intermediary establishing the communication. This intermediary +is generally the most costly part of the installation and the most +difficult to set up, while it is here that the sensible losses of +energy at the expense of good output occur. And yet our present +ideas cause us to consider this intermediary as more than ever +impossible to suppress; since, if we are definitely quit of the +conception of action at a distance, it becomes inconceivable to us +that energy can be communicated from one point to another without +being carried by some intervening medium. But, practically, the +line will be suppressed if, instead of constructing it +artificially, we use to replace it one of the natural media which +separate two points on the earth. These natural media are divided +into two very distinct categories, and from this classification +arise two series of questions to be examined.</p> +<p>Between the two points in question there are, first, the +material media such as the air, the earth, and the water. For a +long time we have used for transmissions to a distance the elastic +properties of the air, and more recently the electric conductivity +of the soil and of water, particularly that of the sea.</p> +<p>Modern physics leads us on the other hand, as we have seen, to +consider that there exists throughout the whole of the universe +another and more subtle medium which penetrates everywhere, is +endowed with elasticity <i>in vacuo</i>, and retains its elasticity +when it penetrates into a great number of bodies, such as the air. +This medium is the luminous ether which possesses, as we cannot +doubt, the property of being able to transmit energy, since it +itself brings to us by far the larger part of the energy which we +possess on earth and which we find in the movements of the +atmosphere, or of waterfalls, and in the coal mines proceeding from +the decomposition of carbon compounds under the influence of the +solar energy. For a long time also before the existence of the +ether was known, the duty of transmitting signals was entrusted to +it. Thus through the ages a double evolution is unfolded which has +to be followed by the historian who is ambitious of +completeness.</p> +<p><br /></p> +<p class="textbold">§ 3</p> +<p>If such an historian were to examine from the beginning the +first order of questions, he might, no doubt, speak only briefly of +the attempts earlier than electric telegraphy. Without seeking to +be paradoxical, he certainly ought to mention the invention of the +speaking-trumpet and other similar inventions which for a long time +have enabled mankind, by the ingenious use of the elastic +properties of the natural media, to communicate at greater +distances than they could have attained without the aid of art. +After this in some sort prehistoric period had been rapidly run +through, he would have to follow very closely the development of +electric telegraphy. Almost from the outset, and shortly after +Ampère had made public the idea of constructing a telegraph, +and the day after Gauss and Weber set up between their houses in +Göttingen the first line really used, it was thought that the +conducting properties of the earth and water might be made of +service.</p> +<p>The history of these trials is very long, and is closely mixed +up with the history of ordinary telegraphy; long chapters for some +time past have been devoted to it in telegraphic treatises. It was +in 1838, however, that Professor C.A. Steinheil of Munich +expressed, for the first time, the clear idea of suppressing the +return wire and replacing it by a connection of the line wire to +the earth. He thus at one step covered half the way, the easiest, +it is true, which was to lead to the final goal, since he saved the +use of one-half of the line of wire. Steinheil, advised, perhaps, +by Gauss, had, moreover, a very exact conception of the part taken +by the earth considered as a conducting body. He seems to have well +understood that, in certain conditions, the resistance of such a +conductor, though supposed to be unlimited, might be independent of +the distance apart of the electrodes which carry the current and +allow it to go forth. He likewise thought of using the railway +lines to transmit telegraphic signals.</p> +<p>Several scholars who from the first had turned their minds to +telegraphy, had analogous ideas. It was thus that S.F.B. Morse, +superintendent of the Government telegraphs in the United States, +whose name is universally known in connection with the very simple +apparatus invented by him, made experiments in the autumn of 1842 +before a special commission in New York and a numerous public +audience, to show how surely and how easily his apparatus worked. +In the very midst of his experiments a very happy idea occurred to +him of replacing by the water of a canal, the length of about a +mile of wire which had been suddenly and accidentally destroyed. +This accident, which for a moment compromised the legitimate +success the celebrated engineer expected, thus suggested to him a +fruitful idea which he did not forget. He subsequently repeated +attempts to thus utilise the earth and water, and obtained some +very remarkable results.</p> +<p>It is not possible to quote here all the researches undertaken +with the same purpose, to which are more particularly attached the +names of S.W. Wilkins, Wheatstone, and H. Highton, in England; of +Bonetti in Italy, Gintl in Austria, Bouchot and Donat in France; +but there are some which cannot be recalled without emotion.</p> +<p>On the 17th December 1870, a physicist who has left in the +University of Paris a lasting name, M. d'Almeida, at that time +Professor at the Lycée Henri IV. and later Inspector-General +of Public Instruction, quitted Paris, then besieged, in a balloon, +and descended in the midst of the German lines. He succeeded, after +a perilous journey, in gaining Havre by way of Bordeaux and Lyons; +and after procuring the necessary apparatus in England, he +descended the Seine as far as Poissy, which he reached on the 14th +January 1871. After his departure, two other scholars, MM. Desains +and Bourbouze, relieving each other day and night, waited at Paris, +in a wherry on the Seine, ready to receive the signal which they +awaited with patriotic anxiety. It was a question of working a +process devised by the last-named pair, in which the water of the +river acted the part of the line wire. On the 23rd January the +communication at last seemed to be established, but unfortunately, +first the armistice and then the surrender of Paris rendered +useless the valuable result of this noble effort.</p> +<p>Special mention is also due to the experiments made by the +Indian Telegraph Office, under the direction of Mr Johnson and +afterwards of Mr W.F. Melhuish. They led, indeed, in 1889 to such +satisfactory results that a telegraph service, in which the line +wire was replaced by the earth, worked practically and regularly. +Other attempts were also made during the latter half of the +nineteenth century to transmit signals through the sea. They +preceded the epoch when, thanks to numerous physicists, among whom +Lord Kelvin undoubtedly occupies a preponderating position, we +succeeded in sinking the first cable; but they were not abandoned, +even after that date, for they gave hopes of a much more economical +solution of the problem. Among the most interesting are remembered +those that S.W. Wilkins carried on for a long time between France +and England. Like Cooke and Wheatstone, he thought of using as a +receiver an apparatus which in some features resembles the present +receiver of the submarine telegraph. Later, George E. Dering, then +James Bowman and Lindsay, made on the same lines trials which are +worthy of being remembered.</p> +<p>But it is only in our own days that Sir William H. Preece at +last obtained for the first time really practical results. Sir +William himself effected and caused to be executed by his +associates—he is chief consulting engineer to the General +Post Office in England—researches conducted with much method +and based on precise theoretical considerations. He thus succeeded +in establishing very easy, clear, and regular communications +between various places; for example, across the Bristol Channel. +The long series of operations accomplished by so many seekers, with +the object of substituting a material and natural medium for the +artificial lines of metal, thus met with an undoubted success which +was soon to be eclipsed by the widely-known experiments directed +into a different line by Marconi.</p> +<p>It is right to add that Sir William Preece had himself utilised +induction phenomena in his experiments, and had begun researches +with the aid of electric waves. Much is due to him for the welcome +he gave to Marconi; it is certainly thanks to the advice and the +material support he found in Sir William that the young scholar +succeeded in effecting his sensational experiments.</p> +<p><br /></p> +<p class="textbold">§ 4</p> +<p>The starting-point of the experiments based on the properties of +the luminous ether, and having for their object the transmission of +signals, is very remote; and it would be a very laborious task to +hunt up all the work accomplished in that direction, even if we +were to confine ourselves to those in which electrical reactions +play a part. An electric reaction, an electrostatic influence, or +an electromagnetic phenomenon, is transmitted at a distance through +the air by the intermediary of the luminous ether. But electric +influence can hardly be used, as the distances it would allow us to +traverse would be much too restricted, and electrostatic actions +are often very erratic. The phenomena of induction, which are very +regular and insensible to the variations of the atmosphere, have, +on the other hand, for a long time appeared serviceable for +telegraphic purposes.</p> +<p>We might find, in a certain number of the attempts just +mentioned, a partial employment of these phenomena. Lindsay, for +instance, in his project of communication across the sea, +attributed to them a considerable rôle. These phenomena even +permitted a true telegraphy without intermediary wire between the +transmitter and the receiver, at very restricted distances, it is +true, but in peculiarly interesting conditions. It is, in fact, +owing to them that C. Brown, and later Edison and Gilliland, +succeeded in establishing communications with trains in motion.</p> +<p>Mr Willoughby S. Smith and Mr Charles A. Stevenson also +undertook experiments during the last twenty years, in which they +used induction, but the most remarkable attempts are perhaps those +of Professor Emile Rathenau. With the assistance of Professor +Rubens and of Herr W. Rathenau, this physicist effected, at the +request of the German Ministry of Marine, a series of researches +which enabled him, by means of a compound system of conduction and +induction by alternating currents, to obtain clear and regular +communications at a distance of four kilometres. Among the +precursors also should be mentioned Graham Bell; the inventor of +the telephone thought of employing his admirable apparatus as a +receiver of induction phenomena transmitted from a distance; +Edison, Herr Sacher of Vienna, M. Henry Dufour of Lausanne, and +Professor Trowbridge of Boston, also made interesting attempts in +the same direction.</p> +<p>In all these experiments occurs the idea of employing an +oscillating current. Moreover, it was known for a long +time—since, in 1842, the great American physicist Henry +proved that the discharges from a Leyden jar in the attic of his +house caused sparks in a metallic circuit on the ground +floor—that a flux which varies rapidly and periodically is +much more efficacious than a simple flux, which latter can only +produce at a distance a phenomenon of slight intensity. This idea +of the oscillating current was closely akin to that which was at +last to lead to an entirely satisfactory solution: that is, to a +solution which is founded on the properties of electric waves.</p> +<p><br /></p> +<p class="textbold">§ 5</p> +<p>Having thus got to the threshold of the definitive edifice, the +historian, who has conducted his readers over the two parallel +routes which have just been marked out, will be brought to ask +himself whether he has been a sufficiently faithful guide and has +not omitted to draw attention to all essential points in the +regions passed through.</p> +<p>Ought we not to place by the side, or perhaps in front, of the +authors who have devised the practical appliances, those scholars +who have constructed the theories and realised the laboratory +experiments of which, after all, the apparatus are only the +immediate applications? If we speak of the propagation of a current +in a material medium, can one forget the names of Fourier and of +Ohm, who established by theoretical considerations the laws which +preside over this propagation? When one looks at the phenomena of +induction, would it not be just to remember that Arago foresaw +them, and that Michael Faraday discovered them? It would be a +delicate, and also a rather puerile task, to class men of genius in +order of merit. The merit of an inventor like Edison and that of a +theorist like Clerk Maxwell have no common measure, and mankind is +indebted for its great progress to the one as much as to the +other.</p> +<p>Before relating how success attended the efforts to utilise +electric waves for the transmission of signals, we cannot without +ingratitude pass over in silence the theoretical speculations and +the work of pure science which led to the knowledge of these waves. +It would therefore be just, without going further back than +Faraday, to say how that illustrious physicist drew attention to +the part taken by insulating media in electrical phenomena, and to +insist also on the admirable memoirs in which for the first time +Clerk Maxwell made a solid bridge between those two great chapters +of Physics, optics and electricity, which till then had been +independent of each other. And no doubt it would be impossible not +to evoke the memory of those who, by establishing, on the other +hand, the solid and magnificent structure of physical optics, and +proving by their immortal works the undulatory nature of light, +prepared from the opposite direction the future unity. In the +history of the applications of electrical undulations, the names of +Young, Fresnel, Fizeau, and Foucault must be inscribed; without +these scholars, the assimilation between electrical and luminous +phenomena which they discovered and studied would evidently have +been impossible.</p> +<p>Since there is an absolute identity of nature between the +electric and the luminous waves, we should, in all justice, also +consider as precursors those who devised the first luminous +telegraphs. Claude Chappe incontestably effected wireless +telegraphy, thanks to the luminous ether, and the learned men, such +as Colonel Mangin, who perfected optical telegraphy, indirectly +suggested certain improvements lately introduced into the present +method.</p> +<p>But the physicist whose work should most of all be put in +evidence is, without fear of contradiction, Heinrich Hertz. It was +he who demonstrated irrefutably, by experiments now classic, that +an electric discharge produces an undulatory disturbance in the +ether contained in the insulating media in its neighbourhood; it +was he who, as a profound theorist, a clever mathematician, and an +experimenter of prodigious dexterity, made known the mechanism of +the production, and fully elucidated that of the propagation of +these electromagnetic waves.</p> +<p>He must naturally himself have thought that his discoveries +might be applied to the transmission of signals. It would appear, +however, that when interrogated by a Munich engineer named Huber as +to the possibility of utilising the waves for transmissions by +telephone, he answered in the negative, and dwelt on certain +considerations relative to the difference between the periods of +sounds and those of electrical vibrations. This answer does not +allow us to judge what might have happened, had not a cruel death +carried off in 1894, at the age of thirty-five, the great and +unfortunate physicist.</p> +<p>We might also find in certain works earlier than the experiments +of Hertz attempts at transmission in which, unconsciously no doubt, +phenomena were already set in operation which would, at this day, +be classed as electric oscillations. It is allowable no doubt, not +to speak of an American quack, Mahlon Loomis, who, according to Mr +Story, patented in 1870 a project of communication in which he +utilised the Rocky Mountains on one side and Mont Blanc on the +other, as gigantic antennae to establish communication across the +Atlantic; but we cannot pass over in silence the very remarkable +researches of the American Professor Dolbear, who showed, at the +electrical exhibition of Philadelphia in 1884, a set of apparatus +enabling signals to be transmitted at a distance, which he +described as "an exceptional application of the principles of +electrostatic induction." This apparatus comprised groups of coils +and condensers by means of which he obtained, as we cannot now +doubt, effects due to true electric waves.</p> +<p>Place should also be made for a well-known inventor, D.E. +Hughes, who from 1879 to 1886 followed up some very curious +experiments in which also these oscillations certainly played a +considerable part. It was this physicist who invented the +microphone, and thus, in another way, drew attention to the +variations of contact resistance, a phenomenon not far from that +produced in the radio-conductors of Branly, which are important +organs in the Marconi system. Unfortunately, fatigued and in +ill-health, Hughes ceased his researches at the moment perhaps when +they would have given him final results.</p> +<p>In an order of ideas different in appearance, but closely linked +at bottom with the one just mentioned, must be recalled the +discovery of radiophony in 1880 by Graham Bell, which was +foreshadowed in 1875 by C.A. Brown. A luminous ray falling on a +selenium cell produces a variation of electric resistance, thanks +to which a sound signal can be transmitted by light. That delicate +instrument the radiophone, constructed on this principle, has wide +analogies with the apparatus of to-day.</p> +<p><br /></p> +<p class="textbold">§ 6</p> +<p>Starting from the experiments of Hertz, the history of wireless +telegraphy almost merges into that of the researches on electrical +waves. All the progress realised in the manner of producing and +receiving these waves necessarily helped to give rise to the +application already indicated. The experiments of Hertz, after +being checked in every laboratory, and having entered into the +strong domain of our most certain knowledge, were about to yield +the expected fruit.</p> +<p>Experimenters like Sir Oliver Lodge in England, Righi in Italy, +Sarrazin and de la Rive in Switzerland, Blondlot in France, Lecher +in Germany, Bose in India, Lebedeff in Russia, and theorists like +M.H. Poincaré and Professor Bjerknes, who devised ingenious +arrangements or elucidated certain points left dark, are among the +artisans of the work which followed its natural evolution.</p> +<p>It was Professor R. Threlfall who seems to have been the first +to clearly propose, in 1890, the application of the Hertzian waves +to telegraphy, but it was certainly Sir W. Crookes who, in a very +remarkable article in the <i>Fortnightly Review</i> of February +1892, pointed out very clearly the road to be followed. He even +showed in what conditions the Morse receiver might be applied to +the new system of telegraphy.</p> +<p>About the same period an American physicist, well known by his +celebrated experiments on high frequency +currents—experiments, too, which are not unconnected with +those on electric oscillations,—M. Tesla, demonstrated that +these oscillations could be transmitted to more considerable +distances by making use of two vertical antennae, terminated by +large conductors.</p> +<p>A little later, Sir Oliver Lodge succeeded, by the aid of the +coherer, in detecting waves at relatively long distances, and Mr +Rutherford obtained similar results with a magnetic indicator of +his own invention.</p> +<p>An important question of meteorology, the study of atmospheric +discharges, at this date led a few scholars, and more particularly +the Russian, M. Popoff, to set up apparatus very analogous to the +receiving apparatus of the present wireless telegraphy. This +comprised a long antenna and filings-tube, and M. Popoff even +pointed out that his apparatus might well serve for the +transmission of signals as soon as a generator of waves powerful +enough had been discovered.</p> +<p>Finally, on the 2nd June 1896, a young Italian, born in Bologna +on the 25th April 1874, Guglielmo Marconi, patented a system of +wireless telegraphy destined to become rapidly popular. Brought up +in the laboratory of Professor Righi, one of the physicists who had +done most to confirm and extend the experiments of Hertz, Marconi +had long been familiar with the properties of electric waves, and +was well used to their manipulation. He afterwards had the good +fortune to meet Sir William (then Mr) Preece, who was to him an +adviser of the highest authority.</p> +<p>It has sometimes been said that the Marconi system contains +nothing original; that the apparatus for producing the waves was +the oscillator of Righi, that the receiver was that employed for +some two or three years by Professor Lodge and Mr Bose, and was +founded on an earlier discovery by a French scholar, M. Branly; +and, finally, that the general arrangement was that established by +M. Popoff.</p> +<p>The persons who thus rather summarily judge the work of M. +Marconi show a severity approaching injustice. It cannot, in truth, +be denied that the young scholar has brought a strictly personal +contribution to the solution of the problem he proposed to himself. +Apart from his forerunners, and when their attempts were almost +unknown, he had the very great merit of adroitly arranging the most +favourable combination, and he was the first to succeed in +obtaining practical results, while he showed that the electric +waves could be transmitted and received at distances enormous +compared to those attained before his day. Alluding to a well-known +anecdote relating to Christopher Columbus, Sir W. Preece very +justly said: "The forerunners and rivals of Marconi no doubt knew +of the eggs, but he it was who taught them to make them stand on +end." This judgment will, without any doubt, be the one that +history will definitely pronounce on the Italian scholar.</p> +<p><br /></p> +<p class="textbold">§ 7</p> +<p>The apparatus which enables the electric waves to be revealed, +the detector or indicator, is the most delicate organ in wireless +telegraphy. It is not necessary to employ as an indicator a +filings-tube or radio-conductor. One can, in principle, for the +purpose of constructing a receiver, think of any one of the +multiple effects produced by the Hertzian waves. In many systems in +use, and in the new one of Marconi himself, the use of these tubes +has been abandoned and replaced by magnetic detectors.</p> +<p>Nevertheless, the first and the still most frequent successes +are due to radio-conductors, and public opinion has not erred in +attributing to the inventor of this ingenious apparatus a +considerable and almost preponderant part in the invention of wave +telegraphy.</p> +<p>The history of the discovery of radio-conductors is short, but +it deserves, from its importance, a chapter to itself in the +history of wireless telegraphy. From a theoretical point of view, +the phenomena produced in those tubes should be set by the side of +those studied by Graham Bell, C.A. Brown, and Summer Tainter, from +the year 1878 onward. The variations to which luminous waves give +rise in the resistance of selenium and other substances are, +doubtless, not unconnected with those which the electric waves +produce in filings. A connection can also be established between +this effect of the waves and the variations of contact resistance +which enabled Hughes to construct the microphone, that admirable +instrument which is one of the essential organs of telephony.</p> +<p>More directly, as an antecedent to the discovery, should be +quoted the remark made by Varley in 1870, that coal-dust changes in +conductivity when the electromotive force of the current which +passes through it is made to vary. But it was in 1884 that an +Italian professor, Signor Calzecchi-Onesti, demonstrated in a +series of remarkable experiments that the metallic filings +contained in a tube of insulating material, into which two metallic +electrodes are inserted, acquire a notable conductivity under +different influences such as extra currents, induced currents, +sonorous vibrations, etc., and that this conductivity is easily +destroyed; as, for instance, by turning the tube over and over.</p> +<p>In several memoirs published in 1890 and 1891, M. Ed. Branly +independently pointed out similar phenomena, and made a much more +complete and systematic study of the question. He was the first to +note very clearly that the action described could be obtained by +simply making sparks pass in the neighbourhood of the +radio-conductor, and that their great resistance could be restored +to the filings by giving a slight shake to the tube or to its +supports.</p> +<p>The idea of utilising such a very interesting phenomenon as an +indicator in the study of the Hertzian waves seems to have occurred +simultaneously to several physicists, among whom should be +especially mentioned M. Ed. Branly himself, Sir Oliver Lodge, and +MM. Le Royer and Van Beschem, and its use in laboratories rapidly +became quite common.</p> +<p>The action of the waves on metallic powders has, however, +remained some what mysterious; for ten years it has been the +subject of important researches by Professor Lodge, M. Branly, and +a very great number of the most distinguished physicists. It is +impossible to notice here all these researches, but from a recent +and very interesting work of M. Blanc, it would seem that the +phenomenon is allied to that of ionisation.</p> +<p><br /></p> +<p class="textbold">§ 8</p> +<p>The history of wireless telegraphy does not end with the first +experiments of Marconi; but from the moment their success was +announced in the public press, the question left the domain of pure +science to enter into that of commerce. The historian's task here +becomes different, but even more delicate; and he will encounter +difficulties which can be only known to one about to write the +history of a commercial invention.</p> +<p>The actual improvements effected in the system are kept secret +by the rival companies, and the most important results are +patriotically left in darkness by the learned officers who operate +discreetly in view of the national defence. Meanwhile, men of +business desirous of bringing out a company proclaim, with great +nourish of advertisements, that they are about to exploit a process +superior to all others.</p> +<p>On this slippery ground the impartial historian must +nevertheless venture; and he may not refuse to relate the progress +accomplished, which is considerable. Therefore, after having +described the experiments carried out for nearly ten years by +Marconi himself, first across the Bristol Channel, then at Spezzia, +between the coast and the ironclad <i>San Bartolommeo</i>, and +finally by means of gigantic apparatus between America and England, +he must give the names of those who, in the different civilised +countries, have contributed to the improvement of the system of +communication by waves; while he must describe what precious +services this system has already rendered to the art of war, and +happily also to peaceful navigation.</p> +<p>From the point of view of the theory of the phenomena, very +remarkable results have been obtained by various physicists, among +whom should be particularly mentioned M. Tissot, whose brilliant +studies have thrown a bright light on different interesting points, +such as the rôle of the antennae. It would be equally +impossible to pass over in silence other recent attempts in a +slightly different groove. Marconi's system, however improved it +may be to-day, has one grave defect. The synchronism of the two +pieces of apparatus, the transmitter and the receiver, is not +perfect, so that a message sent off by one station may be captured +by some other station. The fact that the phenomena of resonance are +not utilised, further prevents the quantity of energy received by +the receiver from being considerable, and hence the effects reaped +are very weak, so that the system remains somewhat fitful and the +communications are often disturbed by atmospheric phenomena. Causes +which render the air a momentary conductor, such as electrical +discharges, ionisation, etc., moreover naturally prevent the waves +from passing, the ether thus losing its elasticity.</p> +<p>Professor Ferdinand Braun of Strasburg has conceived the idea of +employing a mixed system, in which the earth and the water, which, +as we have seen, have often been utilised to conduct a current for +transmitting a signal, will serve as a sort of guide to the waves +themselves. The now well-known theory of the propagation of waves +guided by a conductor enables it to be foreseen that, according to +their periods, these waves will penetrate more or less deeply into +the natural medium, from which fact has been devised a method of +separating them according to their frequency. By applying this +theory, M. Braun has carried out, first in the fortifications of +Strasburg, and then between the island of Heligoland and the +mainland, experiments which have given remarkable results. We might +mention also the researches, in a somewhat analogous order of +ideas, by an English engineer, Mr Armstrong, by Dr Lee de Forest, +and also by Professor Fessenden.</p> +<p>Having thus arrived at the end of this long journey, which has +taken him from the first attempts down to the most recent +experiments, the historian can yet set up no other claim but that +of having written the commencement of a history which others must +continue in the future. Progress does not stop, and it is never +permissible to say that an invention has reached its final +form.</p> +<p>Should the historian desire to give a conclusion to his labour +and answer the question the reader would doubtless not fail to put +to him, "To whom, in short, should the invention of wireless +telegraphy more particularly be attributed?" he should certainly +first give the name of Hertz, the genius who discovered the waves, +then that of Marconi, who was the first to transmit signals by the +use of Hertzian undulations, and should add those of the scholars +who, like Morse, Popoff, Sir W. Preece, Lodge, and, above all, +Branly, have devised the arrangements necessary for their +transmission. But he might then recall what Voltaire wrote in the +<i>Philosophical Dictionary</i>:</p> +<p>"What! We wish to know what was the exact theology of Thot, of +Zerdust, of Sanchuniathon, of the first Brahmins, and we are +ignorant of the inventor of the shuttle! The first weaver, the +first mason, the first smith, were no doubt great geniuses, but +they were disregarded. Why? Because none of them invented a +perfected art. The one who hollowed out an oak to cross a river +never made a galley; those who piled up rough stones with girders +of wood did not plan the Pyramids. Everything is made by degrees +and the glory belongs to no one."</p> +<p>To-day, more than ever, the words of Voltaire are true: science +becomes more and more impersonal, and she teaches us that progress +is nearly always due to the united efforts of a crowd of workers, +and is thus the best school of social solidarity.</p> +<hr style="width: 65%;" /> +<h3><a name="CHAPTER_VIII" id="CHAPTER_VIII"></a>CHAPTER VIII</h3> +<h2>THE CONDUCTIVITY OF GASES AND THE IONS</h2> +<p class="textbold">§ 1. THE CONDUCTIVITY OF GASES</p> +<p>If we were confined to the facts I have set forth above, we +might conclude that two classes of phenomena are to-day being +interpreted with increasing correctness in spite of the few +difficulties which have been pointed out. The hypothesis of the +molecular constitution of matter enables us to group together one +of these classes, and the hypothesis of the ether leads us to +co-ordinate the other.</p> +<p>But these two classes of phenomena cannot be considered +independent of each other. Relations evidently exist between matter +and the ether, which manifest themselves in many cases accessible +to experiment, and the search for these relations appears to be the +paramount problem the physicist should set himself. The question +has, for a long time, been attacked on various sides, but the +recent discoveries in the conductivity of gases, of the radioactive +substances, and of the cathode and similar rays, have allowed us of +late years to regard it in a new light. Without wishing to set out +here in detail facts which for the most part are well known, we +will endeavour to group the chief of them round a few essential +ideas, and will seek to state precisely the data they afford us for +the solution of this grave problem.</p> +<p>It was the study of the conductivity of gases which at the very +first furnished the most important information, and allowed us to +penetrate more deeply than had till then been possible into the +inmost constitution of matter, and thus to, as it were, catch in +the act the actions that matter can exercise on the ether, or, +reciprocally, those it may receive from it.</p> +<p>It might, perhaps, have been foreseen that such a study would +prove remarkably fruitful. The examination of the phenomena of +electrolysis had, in fact, led to results of the highest importance +on the constitution of liquids, and the gaseous media which +presented themselves as particularly simple in all their properties +ought, it would seem, to have supplied from the very first a field +of investigation easy to work and highly productive.</p> +<p>This, however, was not at all the case. Experimental +complications springing up at every step obscured the problem. One +generally found one's self in the presence of violent disruptive +discharges with a train of accessory phenomena, due, for instance, +to the use of metallic electrodes, and made evident by the complex +appearance of aigrettes and effluves; or else one had to deal with +heated gases difficult to handle, which were confined in +receptacles whose walls played a troublesome part and succeeded in +veiling the simplicity of the fundamental facts. Notwithstanding, +therefore, the efforts of a great number of seekers, no general +idea disengaged itself out of a mass of often contradictory +information.</p> +<p>Many physicists, in France particularly, discarded the study of +questions which seemed so confused, and it must even be frankly +acknowledged that some among them had a really unfounded distrust +of certain results which should have been considered proved, but +which had the misfortune to be in contradiction with the theories +in current use. All the classic ideas relating to electrical +phenomena led to the consideration that there existed a perfect +symmetry between the two electricities, positive and negative. In +the passing of electricity through gases there is manifested, on +the contrary, an evident dissymmetry. The anode and the cathode are +immediately distinguished in a tube of rarefied gas by their +peculiar appearance; and the conductivity does not appear, under +certain conditions, to be the same for the two modes of +electrification.</p> +<p>It is not devoid of interest to note that Erman, a German +scholar, once very celebrated and now generally forgotten, drew +attention as early as 1815 to the unipolar conductivity of a flame. +His contemporaries, as may be gathered from the perusal of the +treatises on physics of that period, attached great importance to +this discovery; but, as it was somewhat inconvenient and did not +readily fit in with ordinary studies, it was in due course +neglected, then considered as insufficiently established, and +finally wholly forgotten.</p> +<p>All these somewhat obscure facts, and some others—such as +the different action of ultra-violet radiations on positively and +negatively charged bodies—are now, on the contrary, about to +be co-ordinated, thanks to the modern ideas on the mechanism of +conduction; while these ideas will also allow us to interpret the +most striking dissymmetry of all, <i>i.e.</i> that revealed by +electrolysis itself, a dissymmetry which certainly can not be +denied, but to which sufficient attention has not been given.</p> +<p>It is to a German physicist, Giese, that we owe the first +notions on the mechanism of the conductivity of gases, as we now +conceive it. In two memoirs published in 1882 and 1889, he plainly +arrives at the conception that conduction in gases is not due to +their molecules, but to certain fragments of them or to ions. Giese +was a forerunner, but his ideas could not triumph so long as there +were no means of observing conduction in simple circumstances. But +this means has now been supplied in the discovery of the X rays. +Suppose we pass through some gas at ordinary pressure, such as +hydrogen, a pencil of X rays. The gas, which till then has behaved +as a perfect insulator,<a name="FNanchor_29_29" id= +"FNanchor_29_29"></a><a href="#Footnote_29_29" class= +"fnanchor">[29]</a> suddenly acquires a remarkable conductivity. If +into this hydrogen two metallic electrodes in communication with +the two poles of a battery are introduced, a current is set up in +very special conditions which remind us, when they are checked by +experiments, of the mechanism which allows the passage of +electricity in electrolysis, and which is so well represented to us +when we picture to ourselves this passage as due to the migration +towards the electrodes, under the action of the field, of the two +sets of ions produced by the spontaneous division of the molecule +within the solution.</p> +<p>Let us therefore recognise with J.J. Thomson and the many +physicists who, in his wake, have taken up and developed the idea +of Giese, that, under the influence of the X rays, for reasons +which will have to be determined later, certain gaseous molecules +have become divided into two portions, the one positively and the +other negatively electrified, which we will call, by analogy with +the kindred phenomenon in electrolysis, by the name of ions. If the +gas be then placed in an electric field, produced, for instance, by +two metallic plates connected with the two poles of a battery +respectively, the positive ions will travel towards the plate +connected with the negative pole, and the negative ions in the +contrary direction. There is thus produced a current due to the +transport to the electrodes of the charges which existed on the +ions.</p> +<p>If the gas thus ionised be left to itself, in the absence of any +electric field, the ions, yielding to their mutual attraction, must +finally meet, combine, and reconstitute a neutral molecule, thus +returning to their initial condition. The gas in a short while +loses the conductivity which it had acquired; or this is, at least, +the phenomenon at ordinary temperatures. But if the temperature is +raised, the relative speeds of the ions at the moment of impact may +be great enough to render it impossible for the recombination to be +produced in its entirety, and part of the conductivity will +remain.</p> +<p>Every element of volume rendered a conductor therefore +furnishes, in an electric field, equal quantities of positive and +negative electricity. If we admit, as mentioned above, that these +liberated quantities are borne by ions each bearing an equal +charge, the number of these ions will be proportional to the +quantity of electricity, and instead of speaking of a quantity of +electricity, we could use the equivalent term of number of ions. +For the excitement produced by a given pencil of X rays, the number +of ions liberated will be fixed. Thus, from a given volume of gas +there can only be extracted an equally determinate quantity of +electricity.</p> +<p>The conductivity produced is not governed by Ohm's law. The +intensity is not proportional to the electromotive force, and it +increases at first as the electromotive force augments; but it +approaches asymptotically to a maximum value which corresponds to +the number of ions liberated, and can therefore serve as a measure +of the power of the excitement. It is this current which is termed +the <i>current of saturation</i>.</p> +<p>M. Righi has ably demonstrated that ionised gas does not obey +the law of Ohm by an experiment very paradoxical in appearance. He +found that, the greater the distance of the two electrode plates +from each, the greater may be, within certain limits, the intensity +of the current. The fact is very clearly interpreted by the theory +of ionisation, since the greater the length of the gaseous column +the greater must be the number of ions liberated.</p> +<p>One of the most striking characteristics of ionised gases is +that of discharging electrified conductors. This phenomenon is not +produced by the departure of the charge that these conductors may +possess, but by the advent of opposite charges brought to them by +ions which obey the electrostatic attraction and abandon their own +electrification when they come in contact with these +conductors.</p> +<p>This mode of regarding the phenomena is extremely convenient and +eminently suggestive. It may, no doubt, be thought that the image +of the ions is not identical with objective reality, but we are +compelled to acknowledge that it represents with absolute +faithfulness all the details of the phenomena.</p> +<p>Other facts, moreover, will give to this hypothesis a still +greater value; we shall even be able, so to speak, to grasp these +ions individually, to count them, and to measure their charge.</p> +<p><br /></p> +<p class="textbold">§ 2. THE CONDENSATION OF WATER-VAPOUR BY +IONS</p> +<p>If the pressure of a vapour—that of water, for +instance—in the atmosphere reaches the value of the maximum +pressure corresponding to the temperature of the experiment, the +elementary theory teaches us that the slightest decrease in +temperature will induce a condensation; that small drops will form, +and the mist will turn into rain.</p> +<p>In reality, matters do not occur in so simple a manner. A more +or less considerable delay may take place, and the vapour will +remain supersaturated. We easily discover that this phenomenon is +due to the intervention of capillary action. On a drop of liquid a +surface-tension takes effect which gives rise to a pressure which +becomes greater the smaller the diameter of the drop.</p> +<p>Pressure facilitates evaporation, and on more closely examining +this reaction we arrive at the conclusion that vapour can never +spontaneously condense itself when liquid drops already formed are +not present, unless forces of another nature intervene to diminish +the effect of the capillary forces. In the most frequent cases, +these forces come from the dust which is always in suspension in +the air, or which exists in any recipient. Grains of dust act by +reason of their hygrometrical power, and form germs round which +drops presently form. It is possible to make use, as did M. Coulier +as early as 1875, of this phenomenon to carry off the germs of +condensation, by producing by expansion in a bottle containing a +little water a preliminary mist which purifies the air. In +subsequent experiments it will be found almost impossible to +produce further condensation of vapour.</p> +<p>But these forces may also be of electrical origin. Von Helmholtz +long since showed that electricity exercises an influence on the +condensation of the vapour of water, and Mr C.T.R. Wilson, with +this view, has made truly quantitative experiments. It was rapidly +discovered after the apparition of the X rays that gases that have +become conductors, that is, ionised gases, also facilitate the +condensation of supersaturated water vapour.</p> +<p>We are thus led by a new road to the belief that electrified +centres exist in gases, and that each centre draws to itself the +neighbouring molecules of water, as an electrified rod of resin +does the light bodies around it. There is produced in this manner +round each ion an assemblage of molecules of water which constitute +a germ capable of causing the formation of a drop of water out of +the condensation of excess vapour in the ambient air. As might be +expected, the drops are electrified, and take to themselves the +charge of the centres round which they are formed; moreover, as +many drops are created as there are ions. Thereafter we have only +to count these drops to ascertain the number of ions which existed +in the gaseous mass.</p> +<p>To effect this counting, several methods have been used, +differing in principle but leading to similar results. It is +possible, as Mr C.T.R. Wilson and Professor J.J. Thomson have done, +to estimate, on the one hand, the weight of the mist which is +produced in determined conditions, and on the other, the average +weight of the drops, according to the formula formerly given by Sir +G. Stokes, by deducting their diameter from the speed with which +this mist falls; or we can, with Professor Lemme, determine the +average radius of the drops by an optical process, viz. by +measuring the diameter of the first diffraction ring produced when +looking through the mist at a point of light.</p> +<p>We thus get to a very high number. There are, for instance, some +twenty million ions per centimetre cube when the rays have produced +their maximum effect, but high as this figure is, it is still very +small compared with the total number of molecules. All conclusions +drawn from kinetic theory lead us to think that in the same space +there must exist, by the side of a molecule divided into two ions, +a thousand millions remaining in a neutral state and intact.</p> +<p>Mr C.T.R. Wilson has remarked that the positive and negative +ions do not produce condensation with the same facility. The ions +of a contrary sign may be almost completely separated by placing +the ionised gas in a suitably disposed field. In the neighbourhood +of a negative disk there remain hardly any but positive ions, and +against a positive disk none but negative; and in effecting a +separation of this kind, it will be noticed that condensation by +negative ions is easier than by the positive.</p> +<p>It is, consequently, possible to cause condensation on negative +centres only, and to study separately the phenomena produced by the +two kinds of ions. It can thus be verified that they really bear +charges equal in absolute value, and these charges can even be +estimated, since we already know the number of drops. This estimate +can be made, for example, by comparing the speed of the fall of a +mist in fields of different values, or, as did J.J. Thomson, by +measuring the total quantity of electricity liberated throughout +the gas.</p> +<p>At the degree of approximation which such experiments imply, we +find that the charge of a drop, and consequently the charge borne +by an ion, is sensibly 3.4 x 10<sup>-10</sup> electrostatic or 1.1 +x 10<sup>-20</sup> electromagnetic units. This charge is very near +that which the study of the phenomena of ordinary electrolysis +leads us to attribute to a univalent atom produced by electrolytic +dissociation.</p> +<p>Such a coincidence is evidently very striking; but it will not +be the only one, for whatever phenomenon be studied it will always +appear that the smallest charge we can conceive as isolated is that +mentioned. We are, in fact, in presence of a natural unit, or, if +you will, of an atom of electricity.</p> +<p>We must, however, guard against the belief that the gaseous ion +is identical with the electrolytic ion. Sensible differences +between those are immediately apparent, and still greater ones will +be discovered on closer examination.</p> +<p>As M. Perrin has shown, the ionisation produced by the X-rays in +no way depends on the chemical composition of the gas; and whether +we take a volume of gaseous hydrochloric acid or a mixture of +hydrogen and chlorine in the same condition, all the results will +be identical: and chemical affinities play no part here.</p> +<p>We can also obtain other information regarding ions: we can +ascertain, for instance, their velocities, and also get an idea of +their order of magnitude.</p> +<p>By treating the speeds possessed by the liberated charges as +components of the known speed of a gaseous current, Mr Zeleny +measures the mobilities, that is to say, the speeds acquired by the +positive and negative charges in a field equal to the electrostatic +unit. He has thus found that these mobilities are different, and +that they vary, for example, between 400 and 200 centimetres per +second for the two charges in dry gases, the positive being less +mobile than the negative ions, which suggests the idea that they +are of greater mass.<a name="FNanchor_30_30" id= +"FNanchor_30_30"></a><a href="#Footnote_30_30" class= +"fnanchor">[30]</a></p> +<p>M. Langevin, who has made himself the eloquent apostle of the +new doctrines in France, and has done much to make them understood +and admitted, has personally undertaken experiments analogous to +those of M. Zeleny, but much more complete. He has studied in a +very ingenious manner, not only the mobilities, but also the law of +recombination which regulates the spontaneous return of the gas to +its normal state. He has determined experimentally the relation of +the number of recombinations to the number of collisions between +two ions of contrary sign, by studying the variation produced by a +change in the value of the field, in the quantity of electricity +which can be collected in the gas separating two parallel metallic +plates, after the passage through it for a very short time of the +Röntgen rays emitted during one discharge of a Crookes tube. +If the image of the ions is indeed conformable to reality, this +relation must evidently always be smaller than unity, and must tend +towards this value when the mobility of the ions diminishes, that +is to say, when the pressure of the gas increases. The results +obtained are in perfect accord with this anticipation.</p> +<p>On the other hand, M. Langevin has succeeded, by following the +displacement of the ions between the parallel plates after the +ionisation produced by the radiation, in determining the absolute +values of the mobilities with great precision, and has thus clearly +placed in evidence the irregularity of the mobilities of the +positive and negative ions respectively. Their mass can be +calculated when we know, through experiments of this kind, the +speed of the ions in a given field, and on the other hand—as +we can now estimate their electric charge—the force which +moves them. They evidently progress more slowly the larger they +are; and in the viscous medium constituted by the gas, the +displacement is effected at a speed sensibly proportional to the +motive power.</p> +<p>At the ordinary temperature these masses are relatively +considerable, and are greater for the positive than for the +negative ions, that is to say, they are about the order of some ten +molecules. The ions, therefore, seem to be formed by an +agglomeration of neutral molecules maintained round an electrified +centre by electrostatic attraction. If the temperature rises, the +thermal agitation will become great enough to prevent the molecules +from remaining linked to the centre. By measurements effected on +the gases of flames, we arrive at very different values of the +masses from those found for ordinary ions, and above all, very +different ones for ions of contrary sign. The negative ions have +much more considerable velocities than the positive ones. The +latter also seem to be of the same size as atoms; and the +first-named must, consequently, be considered as very much smaller, +and probably about a thousand times less.</p> +<p>Thus, for the first time in science, the idea appears that the +atom is not the smallest fraction of matter to be considered. +Fragments a thousand times smaller may exist which possess, +however, a negative charge. These are the electrons, which other +considerations will again bring to our notice.</p> +<p><br /></p> +<p class="textbold">§ 3. HOW IONS ARE PRODUCED</p> +<p>It is very seldom that a gaseous mass does not contain a few +ions. They may have been formed from many causes, for although to +give precision to our studies, and to deal with a well ascertained +case, I mentioned only ionisation by the X rays in the first +instance, I ought not to give the impression that the phenomenon is +confined to these rays. It is, on the contrary, very general, and +ionisation is just as well produced by the cathode rays, by the +radiations emitted by radio-active bodies, by the ultra-violet +rays, by heating to a high temperature, by certain chemical +actions, and finally by the impact of the ions already existing in +neutral molecules.</p> +<p>Of late years these new questions have been the object of a +multitude of researches, and if it has not always been possible to +avoid some confusion, yet certain general conclusions may be drawn. +The ionisation by flames, in particular, is fairly well known. For +it to be produced spontaneously, it would appear that there must +exist simultaneously a rather high temperature and a chemical +action in the gas. According to M. Moreau, the ionisation is very +marked when the flame contains the vapour of the salt of an alkali +or of an alkaline earth, but much less so when it contains that of +other salts. Arrhenius, Mr C.T.R. Wilson, and M. Moreau, have +studied all the circumstances of the phenomenon; and it seems +indeed that there is a somewhat close analogy between what first +occurs in the saline vapours and that which is noted in liquid +electrolytes. There should be produced, as soon as a certain +temperature is reached, a dissociation of the saline molecule; and, +as M. Moreau has shown in a series of very well conducted +researches, the ions formed at about 100°C. seem constituted by +an electrified centre of the size of a gas molecule, surrounded by +some ten layers of other molecules. We are thus dealing with rather +large ions, but according to Mr Wilson, this condensation +phenomenon does not affect the number of ions produced by +dissociation. In proportion as the temperature rises, the molecules +condensed round the nucleus disappear, and, as in all other +circumstances, the negative ion tends to become an electron, while +the positive ion continues the size of an atom.</p> +<p>In other cases, ions are found still larger than those of saline +vapours, as, for example, those produced by phosphorus. It has long +been known that air in the neighbourhood of phosphorus becomes a +conductor, and the fact, pointed out as far back as 1885 by +Matteucci, has been well studied by various experimenters, by MM. +Elster and Geitel in 1890, for instance. On the other hand, in 1893 +Mr Barus established that the approach of a stick of phosphorus +brings about the condensation of water vapour, and we really have +before us, therefore, in this instance, an ionisation. M. Bloch has +succeeded in disentangling the phenomena, which are here very +complex, and in showing that the ions produced are of considerable +dimensions; for their speed in the same conditions is on the +average a thousand times less than that of ions due to the X rays. +M. Bloch has established also that the conductivity of +recently-prepared gases, already studied by several authors, was +analogous to that which is produced by phosphorus, and that it is +intimately connected with the presence of the very tenuous solid or +liquid dust which these gases carry with them, while the ions are +of the same order of magnitude. These large ions exist, moreover, +in small quantities in the atmosphere; and M. Langevin lately +succeeded in revealing their presence.</p> +<p>It may happen, and this not without singularly complicating +matters, that the ions which were in the midst of material +molecules produce, as the result of collisions, new divisions in +these last. Other ions are thus born, and this production is in +part compensated for by recombinations between ions of opposite +signs. The impacts will be more active in the event of the gas +being placed in a field of force and of the pressure being slight, +the speed attained being then greater and allowing the active force +to reach a high value. The energy necessary for the production of +an ion is, in fact, according to Professor Rutherford and Professor +Stark, something considerable, and it much exceeds the analogous +force in electrolytic decomposition.</p> +<p>It is therefore in tubes of rarefied gas that this ionisation by +impact will be particularly felt. This gives us the reason for the +aspect presented by Geissler tubes. Generally, in the case of +discharges, new ions produced by the molecules struck come to add +themselves to the electrons produced, as will be seen, by the +cathode. A full discussion has led to the interpretation of all the +known facts, and to our understanding, for instance, why there +exist bright or dark spaces in certain regions of the tube. M. +Pellat, in particular, has given some very fine examples of this +concordance between the theory and the facts he has skilfully +observed.</p> +<p>In all the circumstances, then, in which ions appear, their +formation has doubtless been provoked by a mechanism analogous to +that of the shock. The X rays, if they are attributable to sudden +variations in the ether—that is to say, a variation of the +two vectors of Hertz—themselves produce within the atom a +kind of electric impulse which breaks it into two electrified +fragments; <i>i.e.</i> the positive centre, the size of the +molecule itself, and the negative centre, constituted by an +electron a thousand times smaller. Round these two centres, at the +ordinary temperature, are agglomerated by attraction other +molecules, and in this manner the ions whose properties have just +been studied are formed.</p> +<p><br /></p> +<p class="textbold">§ 4. ELECTRONS IN METALS</p> +<p>The success of the ionic hypothesis as an interpretation of the +conductivity of electrolytes and gases has suggested the desire to +try if a similar hypothesis can represent the ordinary conductivity +of metals. We are thus led to conceptions which at first sight seem +audacious because they are contrary to our habits of mind. They +must not, however, be rejected on that account. Electrolytic +dissociation at first certainly appeared at least as strange; yet +it has ended by forcing itself upon us, and we could, at the +present day, hardly dispense with the image it presents to us.</p> +<p>The idea that the conductivity of metals is not essentially +different from that of electrolytic liquids or gases, in the sense +that the passage of the current is connected with the transport of +small electrified particles, is already of old date. It was +enunciated by W. Weber, and afterwards developed by Giese, but has +only obtained its true scope through the effect of recent +discoveries. It was the researches of Riecke, later, of Drude, and, +above all, those of J.J. Thomson, which have allowed it to assume +an acceptable form. All these attempts are connected however with +the general theory of Lorentz, which we will examine later.</p> +<p>It will be admitted that metallic atoms can, like the saline +molecule in a solution, partially dissociate themselves. Electrons, +very much smaller than atoms, can move through the structure, +considerable to them, which is constituted by the atom from which +they have just been detached. They may be compared to the molecules +of a gas which is enclosed in a porous body. In ordinary +conditions, notwithstanding the great speed with which they are +animated, they are unable to travel long distances, because they +quickly find their road barred by a material atom. They have to +undergo innumerable impacts, which throw them first in one +direction and then in another. The passage of a current is a sort +of flow of these electrons in a determined direction. This electric +flow brings, however, no modification to the material medium +traversed, since every electron which disappears at any point is +replaced by another which appears at once, and in all metals the +electrons are identical.</p> +<p>This hypothesis leads us to anticipate certain facts which +experience confirms. Thus J.J. Thomson shows that if, in certain +conditions, a conductor is placed in a magnetic field, the ions +have to describe an epicycloid, and their journey is thus +lengthened, while the electric resistance must increase. If the +field is in the direction of the displacement, they describe +helices round the lines of force and the resistance is again +augmented, but in different proportions. Various experimenters have +noted phenomena of this kind in different substances.</p> +<p>For a long time it has been noticed that a relation exists +between the calorific and the electric conductivity; the relation +of these two conductivities is sensibly the same for all metals. +The modern theory tends to show simply that it must indeed be so. +Calorific conductivity is due, in fact, to an exchange of electrons +between the hot and the cold regions, the heated electrons having +the greater velocity, and consequently the more considerable +energy. The calorific exchanges then obey laws similar to those +which govern electric exchanges; and calculation even leads to the +exact values which the measurements have given.<a name= +"FNanchor_31_31" id="FNanchor_31_31"></a> <a href="#Footnote_31_31" +class="fnanchor">[31]</a></p> +<p>In the same way Professor Hesehus has explained how contact +electrification is produced, by the tendency of bodies to equalise +their superficial properties by means of a transport of electrons, +and Mr Jeans has shown that we should discover the existence of the +well-known laws of distribution over conducting bodies in +electrostatic equilibrium. A metal can, in fact, be electrified, +that is to say, may possess an excess of positive or negative +electrons which cannot easily leave it in ordinary conditions. To +cause them to do so would need an appreciable amount of work, on +account of the enormous difference of the specific inductive +capacities of the metal and of the insulating medium in which it is +plunged.</p> +<p>Electrons, however, which, on arriving at the surface of the +metal, possessed a kinetic energy superior to this work, might be +shot forth and would be disengaged as a vapour escapes from a +liquid. Now, the number of these rapid electrons, at first very +slight, increases, according to the kinetic theory, when the +temperature rises, and therefore we must reckon that a wire, on +being heated, gives out electrons, that is to say, loses negative +electricity and sends into the surrounding media electrified +centres capable of producing the phenomena of ionisation. Edison, +in 1884, showed that from the filament of an incandescent lamp +there escaped negative electric charges. Since then, Richardson and +J.J. Thomson have examined analogous phenomena. This emission is a +very general phenomenon which, no doubt, plays a considerable part +in cosmic physics. Professor Arrhenius explains, for instance, the +polar auroras by the action of similar corpuscules emitted by the +sun.</p> +<p>In other phenomena we seem indeed to be confronted by an +emission, not of negative electrons, but of positive ions. Thus, +when a wire is heated, not <i>in vacuo</i>, but in a gas, this wire +begins to electrify neighbouring bodies positively. J.J. Thomson +has measured the mass of these positive ions and finds it +considerable, <i>i.e.</i> about 150 times that of an atom of +hydrogen. Some are even larger, and constitute almost a real grain +of dust. We here doubtless meet with the phenomena of +disaggregation undergone by metals at a red heat.</p> +<hr style="width: 65%;" /> +<h3><a name="CHAPTER_IX" id="CHAPTER_IX"></a>CHAPTER IX</h3> +<h2>CATHODE RAYS AND RADIOACTIVE BODIES</h2> +<p class="textbold">§ 1. THE CATHODE RAYS</p> +<p>A wire traversed by an electric current is, as has just been +explained, the seat of a movement of electrons. If we cut this +wire, a flood of electrons, like a current of water which, at the +point where a pipe bursts, flows out in abundance, will appear to +spring out between the two ends of the break.</p> +<p>If the energy of the electrons is sufficient, these electrons +will in fact rush forth and be propagated in the air or in the +insulating medium interposed; but the phenomena of the discharge +will in general be very complex. We shall here only examine a +particularly simple case, viz., that of the cathode rays; and +without entering into details, we shall only note the results +relating to these rays which furnish valuable arguments in favour +of the electronic hypothesis and supply solid materials for the +construction of new theories of electricity and matter.</p> +<p>For a long time it was noticed that the phenomena in a Geissler +tube changed their aspect considerably, when the gas pressure +became very weak, without, however, a complete vacuum being formed. +From the cathode there is shot forth normally and in a straight +line a flood within the tube, dark but capable of impressing a +photographic plate, of developing the fluorescence of various +substances (particularly the glass walls of the tube), and of +producing calorific and mechanical effects. These are the cathode +rays, so named in 1883 by E. Wiedemann, and their name, which was +unknown to a great number of physicists till barely twelve years +ago, has become popular at the present day.</p> +<p>About 1869, Hittorf made an already very complete study of them +and put in evidence their principal properties; but it was the +researches of Sir W. Crookes in especial which drew attention to +them. The celebrated physicist foresaw that the phenomena which +were thus produced in rarefied gases were, in spite of their very +great complication, more simple than those presented by matter +under the conditions in which it is generally met with.</p> +<p>He devised a celebrated theory no longer admissible in its +entirety, because it is not in complete accord with the facts, +which was, however, very interesting, and contained, in germ, +certain of our present ideas. In the opinion of Crookes, in a tube +in which the gas has been rarefied we are in presence of a special +state of matter. The number of the gas molecules has become small +enough for their independence to be almost absolute, and they are +able in this so-called radiant state to traverse long spaces +without departing from a straight line. The cathode rays are due to +a kind of molecular bombardment of the walls of the tubes, and of +the screens which can be introduced into them; and it is the +molecules, electrified by their contact with the cathode and then +forcibly repelled by electrostatic action, which produce, by their +movement and their <i>vis viva</i>, all the phenomena observed. +Moreover, these electrified molecules animated with extremely rapid +velocities correspond, according to the theory verified in the +celebrated experiment of Rowland on convection currents, to a true +electric current, and can be deviated by a magnet.</p> +<p>Notwithstanding the success of Crookes' experiments, many +physicists—the Germans especially—did not abandon an +hypothesis entirely different from that of radiant matter. They +continued to regard the cathode radiation as due to particular +radiations of a nature still little known but produced in the +luminous ether. This interpretation seemed, indeed, in 1894, +destined to triumph definitely through the remarkable discovery of +Lenard, a discovery which, in its turn, was to provoke so many +others and to bring about consequences of which the importance +seems every day more considerable.</p> +<p>Professor Lenard's fundamental idea was to study the cathode +rays under conditions different from those in which they are +produced. These rays are born in a very rarefied space, under +conditions perfectly determined by Sir W. Crookes; but it was a +question whether, when once produced, they would be capable of +propagating themselves in other media, such as a gas at ordinary +pressure, or even in an absolute vacuum. Experiment alone could +answer this question, but there were difficulties in the way of +this which seemed almost insurmountable. The rays are stopped by +glass even of slight thickness, and how then could the almost +vacuous space in which they have to come into existence be +separated from the space, absolutely vacuous or filled with gas, +into which it was desired to bring them?</p> +<p>The artifice used was suggested to Professor Lenard by an +experiment of Hertz. The great physicist had, in fact, shortly +before his premature death, taken up this important question of the +cathode rays, and his genius left there, as elsewhere, its powerful +impress. He had shown that metallic plates of very slight thickness +were transparent to the cathode rays; and Professor Lenard +succeeded in obtaining plates impermeable to air, but which yet +allowed the pencil of cathode rays to pass through them.</p> +<p>Now if we take a Crookes tube with the extremity hermetically +closed by a metallic plate with a slit across the diameter of 1 mm. +in width, and stop this slit with a sheet of very thin aluminium, +it will be immediately noticed that the rays pass through the +aluminium and pass outside the tube. They are propagated in air at +atmospheric pressure, and they can also penetrate into an absolute +vacuum. They therefore can no longer be attributed to radiant +matter, and we are led to think that the energy brought into play +in this phenomenon must have its seat in the light-bearing ether +itself.</p> +<p>But it is a very strange light which is thus subject to magnetic +action, which does not obey the principle of equal angles, and for +which the most various gases are already disturbed media. According +to Crookes it possesses also the singular property of carrying with +it electric charges.</p> +<p>This convection of negative electricity by the cathode rays +seems quite inexplicable on the hypothesis that the rays are +ethereal radiations. Nothing then remained in order to maintain +this hypothesis, except to deny the convection, which, besides, was +only established by indirect experiments. That the reality of this +transport has been placed beyond dispute by means of an extremely +elegant experiment which is all the more convincing that it is so +very simple, is due to M. Perrin. In the interior of a Crookes tube +he collected a pencil of cathode rays in a metal cylinder. +According to the elementary principles of electricity the cylinder +must become charged with the whole charge, if there be one, brought +to it by the rays, and naturally various precautions had to be +taken. But the result was very precise, and doubt could no longer +exist—the rays were electrified.</p> +<p>It might have been, and indeed was, maintained, some time after +this experiment was published, that while the phenomena were +complex inside the tube, outside, things might perhaps occur +differently. Lenard himself, however, with that absence of even +involuntary prejudice common to all great minds, undertook to +demonstrate that the opinion he at first held could no longer be +accepted, and succeeded in repeating the experiment of M. Perrin on +cathode rays in the air and even <i>in vacuo</i>.</p> +<p>On the wrecks of the two contradictory hypotheses thus +destroyed, and out of the materials from which they had been built, +a theory has been constructed which co-ordinates all the known +facts. This theory is furthermore closely allied to the theory of +ionisation, and, like this latter, is based on the concept of the +electron. Cathode rays are electrons in rapid motion.</p> +<p>The phenomena produced both inside and outside a Crookes tube +are, however, generally complex. In Lenard's first experiments, and +in many others effected later when this region of physics was still +very little known, a few confusions may be noticed even at the +present day.</p> +<p>At the spot where the cathode rays strike the walls of the tube +the essentially different X rays appear. These differ from the +cathode radiations by being neither electrified nor deviated by a +magnet. In their turn these X rays may give birth to the secondary +rays of M. Sagnac; and often we find ourselves in presence of +effects from these last-named radiations and not from the true +cathode rays.</p> +<p>The electrons, when they are propagated in a gas, can ionise the +molecules of this gas and unite with the neutral atoms to form +negative ions, while positive ions also appear. There are likewise +produced, at the expense of the gas still subsisting after +rarefication within the tube, positive ions which, attracted by the +cathode and reaching it, are not all neutralised by the negative +electrons, and can, if the cathode be perforated, pass through it, +and if not, pass round it. We have then what are called the canal +rays of Goldstein, which are deviated by an electric or magnetic +field in a contrary direction to the cathode rays; but, being +larger, give weak deviations or may even remain undeviated through +losing their charge when passing through the cathode.</p> +<p>It may also be the parts of the walls at a distance from the +cathode which send a positive rush to the latter, by a similar +mechanism. It may be, again, that in certain regions of the tube +cathode rays are met with diffused by some solid object, without +having thereby changed their nature. All these complexities have +been cleared up by M. Villard, who has published, on these +questions, some remarkably ingenious and particularly careful +experiments.</p> +<p>M. Villard has also studied the phenomena of the coiling of the +rays in a field, as already pointed out by Hittorf and +Plücker. When a magnetic field acts on the cathode particle, +the latter follows a trajectory, generally helicoidal, which is +anticipated by the theory. We here have to do with a question of +ballistics, and experiments duly confirm the anticipations of the +calculation. Nevertheless, rather singular phenomena appear in the +case of certain values of the field, and these phenomena, dimly +seen by Plücker and Birkeland, have been the object of +experiments by M. Villard. The two faces of the cathode seem to +emit rays which are deviated in a direction perpendicular to the +lines of force by an electric field, and do not seem to be +electrified. M. Villard calls them magneto-cathode rays, and +according to M. Fortin these rays may be ordinary cathode rays, but +of very slight velocity.</p> +<p>In certain cases the cathode itself may be superficially +disaggregated, and extremely tenuous particles detach themselves, +which, being carried off at right angles to its surface, may +deposit themselves like a very thin film on objects placed in their +path. Various physicists, among them M. Houllevigue, have studied +this phenomenon, and in the case of pressures between 1/20 and +1/100 of a millimetre, the last-named scholar has obtained mirrors +of most metals, a phenomenon he designates by the name of +ionoplasty.</p> +<p>But in spite of all these accessory phenomena, which even +sometimes conceal those first observed, the existence of the +electron in the cathodic flux remains the essential +characteristic.</p> +<p>The electron can be apprehended in the cathodic ray by the study +of its essential properties; and J.J. Thomson gave great value to +the hypothesis by his measurements. At first he meant to determine +the speed of the cathode rays by direct experiment, and by +observing, in a revolving mirror, the relative displacement of two +bands due to the excitement of two fluorescent screens placed at +different distances from the cathode. But he soon perceived that +the effect of the fluorescence was not instantaneous, and that the +lapse of time might form a great source of error, and he then had +recourse to indirect methods. It is possible, by a simple +calculation, to estimate the deviations produced on the rays by a +magnetic and an electric field respectively as a function of the +speed of propagation and of the relation of the charge to the +material mass of the electron. The measurement of these deviations +will then permit this speed and this relation to be +ascertained.</p> +<p>Other processes may be used which all give the same two +quantities by two suitably chosen measurements. Such are the radius +of the curve taken by the trajectory of the pencil in a +perpendicular magnetic field and the measure of the fall of +potential under which the discharge takes place, or the measure of +the total quantity of electricity carried in one second and the +measure of the calorific energy which may be given, during the same +period, to a thermo-electric junction. The results agree as well as +can be expected, having regard to the difficulty of the +experiments; the values of the speed agree also with those which +Professor Wiechert has obtained by direct measurement.</p> +<p>The speed never depends on the nature of the gas contained in +the Crookes tube, but varies with the value of the fall of +potential at the cathode. It is of the order of one tenth of the +speed of light, and it may rise as high as one third. The cathode +particle therefore goes about three thousand times faster than the +earth in its orbit. The relation is also invariable, even when the +substance of which the cathode is formed is changed or one gas is +substituted for another. It is, on the average, a thousand times +greater than the corresponding relation in electrolysis. As +experiment has shown, in all the circumstances where it has been +possible to effect measurements, the equality of the charges +carried by all corpuscules, ions, atoms, etc., we ought to consider +that the charge of the electron is here, again, that of a univalent +ion in electrolysis, and therefore that its mass is only a small +fraction of that of the atom of hydrogen, viz., of the order of +about a thousandth part. This is the same result as that to which +we were led by the study of flames.</p> +<p>The thorough examination of the cathode radiation, then, +confirms us in the idea that every material atom can be dissociated +and will yield an electron much smaller than itself—and +always identical whatever the matter whence it comes,—the +rest of the atom remaining charged with a positive quantity equal +and contrary to that borne by the electron. In the present case +these positive ions are no doubt those that we again meet with in +the canal rays. Professor Wien has shown that their mass is really, +in fact, of the order of the mass of atoms. Although they are all +formed of identical electrons, there may be various cathode rays, +because the velocity is not exactly the same for all electrons. +Thus is explained the fact that we can separate them and that we +can produce a sort of spectrum by the action of the magnet, or, +again, as M. Deslandres has shown in a very interesting experiment, +by that of an electrostatic field. This also probably explains the +phenomena studied by M. Villard, and previously pointed out.</p> +<p><br /></p> +<p class="textbold">§ 2. RADIOACTIVE SUBSTANCES</p> +<p>Even in ordinary conditions, certain substances called +radioactive emit, quite outside any particular reaction, radiations +complex indeed, but which pass through fairly thin layers of +minerals, impress photographic plates, excite fluorescence, and +ionize gases. In these radiations we again find electrons which +thus escape spontaneously from radioactive bodies.</p> +<p>It is not necessary to give here a history of the discovery of +radium, for every one knows the admirable researches of M. and +Madame Curie. But subsequent to these first studies, a great number +of facts have accumulated for the last six years, among which some +people find themselves a little lost. It may, perhaps, not be +useless to indicate the essential results actually obtained.</p> +<p>The researches on radioactive substances have their +starting-point in the discovery of the rays of uranium made by M. +Becquerel in 1896. As early as 1867 Niepce de St Victor proved that +salts of uranium impressed photographic plates in the dark; but at +that time the phenomenon could only pass for a singularity +attributable to phosphorescence, and the valuable remarks of Niepce +fell into oblivion. M. Becquerel established, after some +hesitations natural in the face of phenomena which seemed so +contrary to accepted ideas, that the radiating property was +absolutely independent of phosphorescence, that all the salts of +uranium, even the uranous salts which are not phosphorescent, give +similar radiant effects, and that these phenomena correspond to a +continuous emission of energy, but do not seem to be the result of +a storage of energy under the influence of some external radiation. +Spontaneous and constant, the radiation is insensible to variations +of temperature and light.</p> +<p>The nature of these radiations was not immediately +understood,<a name="FNanchor_32_32" id="FNanchor_32_32"></a> +<a href="#Footnote_32_32" class="fnanchor">[32]</a> and their +properties seemed contradictory. This was because we were not +dealing with a single category of rays. But amongst all the effects +there is one which constitutes for the radiations taken as a whole, +a veritable process for the measurement of radioactivity. This is +their ionizing action on gases. A very complete study of the +conductivity of air under the influence of rays of uranium has been +made by various physicists, particularly by Professor Rutherford, +and has shown that the laws of the phenomenon are the same as those +of the ionization due to the action of the Röntgen rays.</p> +<p>It was natural to ask one's self if the property discovered in +salts of uranium was peculiar to this body, or if it were not, to a +more or less degree, a general property of matter. Madame Curie and +M. Schmidt, independently of each other, made systematic researches +in order to solve the question; various compounds of nearly all the +simple bodies at present known were thus passed in review, and it +was established that radioactivity was particularly perceptible in +the compounds of uranium and thorium, and that it was an atomic +property linked to the matter endowed with it, and following it in +all its combinations. In the course of her researches Madame Curie +observed that certain pitchblendes (oxide of uranium ore, +containing also barium, bismuth, etc.) were four times more active +(activity being measured by the phenomenon of the ionization of the +air) than metallic uranium. Now, no compound containing any other +active metal than uranium or thorium ought to show itself more +active than those metals themselves, since the property belongs to +their atoms. It seemed, therefore, probable that there existed in +pitchblendes some substance yet unknown, in small quantities and +more radioactive than uranium.</p> +<p>M. and Madame Curie then commenced those celebrated experiments +which brought them to the discovery of radium. Their method of +research has been justly compared in originality and importance to +the process of spectrum analysis. To isolate a radioactive +substance, the first thing is to measure the activity of a certain +compound suspected of containing this substance, and this compound +is chemically separated. We then again take in hand all the +products obtained, and by measuring their activity anew, it is +ascertained whether the substance sought for has remained in one of +these products, or is divided among them, and if so, in what +proportion. The spectroscopic reaction which we may use in the +course of this separation is a thousand times less sensitive than +observation of the activity by means of the electrometer.</p> +<p>Though the principle on which the operation of the concentration +of the radium rests is admirable in its simplicity, its application +is nevertheless very laborious. Tons of uranium residues have to be +treated in order to obtain a few decigrammes of pure salts of +radium. Radium is characterised by a special spectrum, and its +atomic weight, as determined by Madame Curie, is 225; it is +consequently the higher homologue of barium in one of the groups of +Mendeléef. Salts of radium have in general the same chemical +properties as the corresponding salts of barium, but are +distinguished from them by the differences of solubility which +allow of their separation, and by their enormous activity, which is +about a hundred thousand times greater than that of uranium.</p> +<p>Radium produces various chemical and some very intense +physiological reactions. Its salts are luminous in the dark, but +this luminosity, at first very bright, gradually diminishes as the +salts get older. We have here to do with a secondary reaction +correlative to the production of the emanation, after which radium +undergoes the transformations which will be studied later on.</p> +<p>The method of analysis founded by M. and Madame Curie has +enabled other bodies presenting sensible radioactivity to be +discovered. The alkaline metals appear to possess this property in +a slight degree. Recently fallen snow and mineral waters manifest +marked action. The phenomenon may often be due, however, to a +radioactivity induced by radiations already existing in the +atmosphere. But this radioactivity hardly attains the +ten-thousandth part of that presented by uranium, or the +ten-millionth of that appertaining to radium.</p> +<p>Two other bodies, polonium and actinium, the one characterised +by the special nature of the radiations it emits and the other by a +particular spectrum, seem likewise to exist in pitchblende. These +chemical properties have not yet been perfectly defined; thus M. +Debierne, who discovered actinium, has been able to note the active +property which seems to belong to it, sometimes in lanthanum, +sometimes in neodynium.<a name="FNanchor_33_33" id= +"FNanchor_33_33"></a><a href="#Footnote_33_33" class= +"fnanchor">[33]</a> It is proved that all extremely radioactive +bodies are the seat of incessant transformations, and even now we +cannot state the conditions under which they present themselves in +a strictly determined form.</p> +<br /> +<p class="textbold">§ 3. THE RADIATION OF THE RADIOACTIVE +BODIES AND THE EMANATION</p> +<p>To acquire exact notions as to the nature of the rays emitted by +the radioactive bodies, it was necessary to try to cause magnetic +or electric forces to act on them so as to see whether they behaved +in the same way as light and the X rays, or whether like the +cathode rays they were deviated by a magnetic field. This work was +effected by Professor Giesel, then by M. Becquerel, Professor +Rutherford, and by many other experimenters after them. All the +methods which have already been mentioned in principle have been +employed in order to discover whether they were electrified, and, +if so, by electricity of what sign, to measure their speed, and to +ascertain their degree of penetration.</p> +<p>The general result has been to distinguish three sorts of +radiations, designated by the letters alpha, beta, gamma.</p> +<p>The alpha rays are positively charged, and are projected at a +speed which may attain the tenth of that of light; M.H. Becquerel +has shown by the aid of photography that they are deviated by a +magnet, and Professor Rutherford has, on his side, studied this +deviation by the electrical method. The relation of the charge to +the mass is, in the case of these rays, of the same order as in +that of the ions of electrolysis. They may therefore be considered +as exactly analogous to the canal rays of Goldstein, and we may +attribute them to a material transport of corpuscles of the +magnitude of atoms. The relatively considerable size of these +corpuscles renders them very absorbable. A flight of a few +millimetres in a gas suffices to reduce their number by one-half. +They have great ionizing power.</p> +<p>The beta rays are on all points similar to the cathode rays; +they are, as M. and Madame Curie have shown, negatively charged, +and the charge they carry is always the same. Their size is that of +the electrons, and their velocity is generally greater than that of +the cathode rays, while it may become almost that of light. They +have about a hundred times less ionizing power than the alpha +rays.</p> +<p>The gamma rays were discovered by M. Villard.<a name= +"FNanchor_34_34" id="FNanchor_34_34"></a><a href="#Footnote_34_34" +class="fnanchor">[34]</a> They may be compared to the X rays; like +the latter, they are not deviated by the magnetic field, and are +also extremely penetrating. A strip of aluminium five millimetres +thick will stop the other kinds, but will allow them to pass. On +the other hand, their ionizing power is 10,000 times less than that +of the alpha rays.</p> +<p>To these radiations there sometimes are added in the course of +experiments secondary radiations analogous to those of M. Sagnac, +and produced when the alpha, beta, or gamma rays meet various +substances. This complication has often led to some errors of +observation.</p> +<p>Phosphorescence and fluorescence seem especially to result from +the alpha and beta rays, particularly from the alpha rays, to which +belongs the most important part of the total energy of the +radiation. Sir W. Crookes has invented a curious little apparatus, +the spinthariscope, which enables us to examine the phosphorescence +of the blende excited by these rays. By means of a magnifying +glass, a screen covered with sulphide of zinc is kept under +observation, and in front of it is disposed, at a distance of about +half a millimetre, a fragment of some salt of radium. We then +perceive multitudes of brilliant points on the screen, which appear +and at once disappear, producing a scintillating effect. It seems +probable that every particle falling on the screen produces by its +impact a disturbance in the neighbouring region, and it is this +disturbance which the eye perceives as a luminous point. Thus, says +Sir W. Crookes, each drop of rain falling on the surface of still +water is not perceived as a drop of rain, but by reason of the +slight splash which it causes at the moment of impact, and which is +manifested by ridges and waves spreading themselves in circles.</p> +<p>The various radioactive substances do not all give radiations of +identical constitution. Radium and thorium possess in somewhat +large proportions the three kinds of rays, and it is the same with +actinium. Polonium contains especially alpha rays and a few gamma +rays.<a name="FNanchor_35_35" id="FNanchor_35_35"></a> <a href= +"#Footnote_35_35" class="fnanchor">[35]</a> In the case of uranium, +the alpha rays have extremely slight penetrating power, and cannot +even impress photographic plates. But the widest difference between +the substances proceeds from the emanation. Radium, in addition to +the three groups of rays alpha, beta, and gamma, disengages +continuously an extremely subtle emanation, seemingly almost +imponderable, but which may be, for many reasons, looked upon as a +vapour of which the elastic force is extremely feeble.</p> +<p>M. and Madame Curie discovered as early as 1899 that every +substance placed in the neighbourhood of radium, itself acquired a +radioactivity which persisted for several hours after the removal +of the radium. This induced radioactivity seems to be carried to +other bodies by the intermediary of a gas. It goes round obstacles, +but there must exist between the radium and the substance a free +and continuous space for the activation to take place; it cannot, +for instance, do so through a wall of glass.</p> +<p>In the case of compounds of thorium Professor Rutherford +discovered a similar phenomenon; since then, various physicists, +Professor Soddy, Miss Brooks, Miss Gates, M. Danne, and others, +have studied the properties of these emanations.</p> +<p>The substance emanated can neither be weighed nor can its +elastic force be ascertained; but its transformations may be +followed, as it is luminous, and it is even more certainly +characterised by its essential property, <i>i.e.</i> its +radioactivity. We also see that it can be decanted like a gas, that +it will divide itself between two tubes of different capacity in +obedience to the law of Mariotte, and will condense in a +refrigerated tube in accordance with the principle of Watt, while +it even complies with the law of Gay-Lussac.</p> +<p>The activity of the emanation vanishes quickly, and at the end +of four days it has diminished by one-half. If a salt of radium is +heated, the emanation becomes more abundant, and the residue, +which, however, does not sensibly diminish in weight, will have +lost all its radioactivity, and will only recover it by degrees. +Professor Rutherford, notwithstanding many different attempts, has +been unable to make this emanation enter into any chemical +reaction. If it be a gaseous body, it must form part of the argon +group, and, like its other members, be perfectly inert.</p> +<p>By studying the spectrum of the gas disengaged by a solution of +salt of radium, Sir William Ramsay and Professor Soddy remarked +that when the gas is radioactive there are first obtained rays of +gases belonging to the argon family, then by degrees, as the +activity disappears, the spectrum slowly changes, and finally +presents the characteristic aspect of helium.</p> +<p>We know that the existence of this gas was first discovered by +spectrum analysis in the sun. Later its presence was noted in our +atmosphere, and in a few minerals which happen to be the very ones +from which radium has been obtained. It might therefore have been +the case that it pre-existed in the gases extracted from radium; +but a remarkable experiment by M. Curie and Sir James Dewar seems +to show convincingly that this cannot be so. The spectrum of helium +never appears at first in the gas proceeding from pure bromide of +radium; but it shows itself, on the other hand, very distinctly, +after the radioactive transformations undergone by the salt.</p> +<p>All these strange phenomena suggest bold hypotheses, but to +construct them with any solidity they must be supported by the +greatest possible number of facts. Before admitting a definite +explanation of the phenomena which have their seat in the curious +substances discovered by them, M. and Madame Curie considered, with +a great deal of reason, that they ought first to enrich our +knowledge with the exact and precise facts relating to these bodies +and to the effects produced by the radiations they emit.</p> +<p>Thus M. Curie particularly set himself to study the manner in +which the radioactivity of the emanation is dissipated, and the +radioactivity that this emanation can induce on all bodies. The +radioactivity of the emanation diminishes in accordance with an +exponential law. The constant of time which characterises this +decrease is easily and exactly determined, and has a fixed value, +independent of the conditions of the experiment as well as of the +nature of the gas which is in contact with the radium and becomes +charged with the emanation. The regularity of the phenomenon is so +great that it can be used to measure time: in 3985 seconds <a name= +"FNanchor_36_36" id="FNanchor_36_36"></a> <a href="#Footnote_36_36" +class="fnanchor">[36]</a> the activity is always reduced +one-half.</p> +<p>Radioactivity induced on any body which has been for a long time +in presence of a salt of radium disappears more rapidly. The +phenomenon appears, moreover, more complex, and the formula which +expresses the manner in which the activity diminishes must contain +two exponentials. To find it theoretically we have to imagine that +the emanation first deposits on the body in question a substance +which is destroyed in giving birth to a second, this latter +disappearing in its turn by generating a third. The initial and +final substances would be radioactive, but the intermediary one, +not. If, moreover, the bodies acted on are brought to a temperature +of over 700°, they appear to lose by volatilisation certain +substances condensed in them, and at the same time their activity +disappears.</p> +<p>The other radioactive bodies behave in a similar way. Bodies +which contain actinium are particularly rich in emanations. +Uranium, on the contrary, has none.<a name="FNanchor_37_37" id= +"FNanchor_37_37"></a><a href="#Footnote_37_37" class= +"fnanchor">[37]</a> This body, nevertheless, is the seat of +transformations comparable to those which the study of emanations +reveals in radium; Sir W. Crookes has separated from uranium a +matter which is now called uranium X. This matter is at first much +more active than its parent, but its activity diminishes rapidly, +while the ordinary uranium, which at the time of the separation +loses its activity, regains it by degrees. In the same way, +Professors Rutherford and Soddy have discovered a so-called thorium +X to be the stage through which ordinary thorium has to pass in +order to produce its emanation.<a name="FNanchor_38_38" id= +"FNanchor_38_38"></a> <a href="#Footnote_38_38" class= +"fnanchor">[38]</a></p> +<p>It is not possible to give a complete table which should, as it +were, represent the genealogical tree of the various radioactive +substances. Several authors have endeavoured to do so, but in a +premature manner; all the affiliations are not at the present time +yet perfectly known, and it will no doubt be acknowledged some day +that identical states have been described under different +names.<a name="FNanchor_39_39" id="FNanchor_39_39"></a> <a href= +"#Footnote_39_39" class="fnanchor">[39]</a></p> +<p><br /></p> +<p class="textbold">§ 4. THE DISAGGREGATION OF MATTER AND +ATOMIC ENERGY</p> +<p>In spite of uncertainties which are not yet entirely removed, it +cannot be denied that many experiments render it probable that in +radioactive bodies we find ourselves witnessing veritable +transformations of matter.</p> +<p>Professor Rutherford, Professor Soddy, and several other +physicists, have come to regard these phenomena in the following +way. A radioactive body is composed of atoms which have little +stability, and are able to detach themselves spontaneously from the +parent substance, and at the same time to divide themselves into +two essential component parts, the negative electron and its +residue the positive ion. The first-named constitutes the beta, and +the second the alpha rays.</p> +<p>The emanation is certainly composed of alpha ions with a few +molecules agglomerated round them. Professor Rutherford has, in +fact, demonstrated that the emanation is charged with positive +electricity; and this emanation may, in turn, be destroyed by +giving birth to new bodies.</p> +<p>After the loss of the atoms which are carried off by the +radiation, the remainder of the body acquires new properties, but +it may still be radioactive, and again lose atoms. The various +stages that we meet with in the evolution of the radioactive +substance or of its emanation, correspond to the various degrees of +atomic disaggregation. Professors Rutherford and Soddy have +described them clearly in the case of uranium and radium. As +regards thorium the results are less satisfactory. The evolution +should continue until a stable atomic condition is finally reached, +which, because of this stability, is no longer radioactive. Thus, +for instance, radium would finally be transformed into +helium.<a name="FNanchor_40_40" id="FNanchor_40_40"></a><a href= +"#Footnote_40_40" class="fnanchor">[40]</a></p> +<p>It is possible, by considerations analogous to those set forth +above in other cases, to arrive at an idea of the total number of +particles per second expelled by one gramme of radium; Professor +Rutherford in his most recent evaluation finds that this number +approaches 2.5 x 10<sup>11</sup>.<a name="FNanchor_41_41" id= +"FNanchor_41_41"></a><a href="#Footnote_41_41" class= +"fnanchor">[41]</a> By calculating from the atomic weight the +number of atoms probably contained in this gramme of radium, and +supposing each particle liberated to correspond to the destruction +of one atom, it is found that one half of the radium should +disappear in 1280 years;<a name="FNanchor_42_42" id= +"FNanchor_42_42"></a><a href="#Footnote_42_42" class= +"fnanchor">[42]</a> and from this we may conceive that it has not +yet been possible to discover any sensible loss of weight. Sir W. +Ramsay and Professor Soddy attained a like result by endeavouring +to estimate the mass of the emanation by the quantity of helium +produced.</p> +<p>If radium transforms itself in such a way that its activity does +not persist throughout the ages, it loses little by little the +provision of energy it had in the beginning, and its properties +furnish no valid argument to oppose to the principle of the +conservation of energy. To put everything right, we have only to +recognise that radium possessed in the potential state at its +formation a finite quantity of energy which is consumed little by +little. In the same manner, a chemical system composed, for +instance, of zinc and sulphuric acid, also contains in the +potential state energy which, if we retard the reaction by any +suitable arrangement—such as by amalgamating the zinc and by +constituting with its elements a battery which we cause to act on a +resistance—may be made to exhaust itself as slowly as one may +desire.</p> +<p>There can, therefore, be nothing in any way surprising in the +fact that a combination which, like the atomic combination of +radium, is not stable—since it disaggregates itself,—is +capable of spontaneously liberating energy, but what may be a +little astonishing, at first sight, is the considerable amount of +this energy.</p> +<p>M. Curie has calculated directly, by the aid of the calorimeter, +the quantity of energy liberated, measuring it entirely in the form +of heat. The disengagement of heat accounted for in a grain of +radium is uniform, and amounts to 100 calories per hour. It must +therefore be admitted that an atom of radium, in disaggregating +itself, liberates 30,000 times more energy than a molecule of +hydrogen when the latter combines with an atom of oxygen to form a +molecule of water.</p> +<p>We may ask ourselves how the atomic edifice of the active body +can be constructed, to contain so great a provision of energy. We +will remark that such a question might be asked concerning cases +known from the most remote antiquity, like that of the chemical +systems, without any satisfactory answer ever being given. This +failure surprises no one, for we get used to everything—even +to defeat.</p> +<p>When we come to deal with a new problem we have really no right +to show ourselves more exacting; yet there are found persons who +refuse to admit the hypothesis of the atomic disaggregation of +radium because they cannot have set before them a detailed plan of +that complex whole known to us as an atom.</p> +<p>The most natural idea is perhaps the one suggested by comparison +with those astronomical phenomena where our observation most +readily allows us to comprehend the laws of motion. It corresponds +likewise to the tendency ever present in the mind of man, to +compare the infinitely small with the infinitely great. The atom +may be regarded as a sort of solar system in which electrons in +considerable numbers gravitate round the sun formed by the positive +ion. It may happen that certain of these electrons are no longer +retained in their orbit by the electric attraction of the rest of +the atom, and may be projected from it like a small planet or comet +which escapes towards the stellar spaces. The phenomena of the +emission of light compels us to think that the corpuscles revolve +round the nucleus with extreme velocities, or at the rate of +thousands of billions of evolutions per second. It is easy to +conceive from this that, notwithstanding its lightness, an atom +thus constituted may possess an enormous energy.<a name= +"FNanchor_43_43" id="FNanchor_43_43"></a><a href="#Footnote_43_43" +class="fnanchor">[43]</a></p> +<p>Other authors imagine that the energy of the corpuscles is +principally due to the extremely rapid rotations of those elements +on their own axes. Lord Kelvin lately drew up on another model the +plan of a radioactive atom capable of ejecting an electron with a +considerable <i>vis viva</i>. He supposes a spherical atom formed +of concentric layers of positive and negative electricity disposed +in such a way that its external action is null, and that, +nevertheless, the force emanated from the centre may be repellent +for certain values when the electron is within it.</p> +<p>The most prudent physicists and those most respectful to +established principles may, without any scruples, admit the +explanation of the radioactivity of radium by a dislocation of its +molecular edifice. The matter of which it is constituted evolves +from an admittedly unstable initial state to another stable one. It +is, in a way, a slow allotropic transformation which takes place by +means of a mechanism regarding which, in short, we have no more +information than we have regarding other analogous transformations. +The only astonishment we can legitimately feel is derived from the +thought that we are suddenly and deeply penetrating to the very +heart of things.</p> +<p>But those persons who have a little more hardihood do not easily +resist the temptation of forming daring generalisations. Thus it +will occur to some that this property, already discovered in many +substances where it exists in more or less striking degree, is, +with differences of intensity, common to all bodies, and that we +are thus confronted by a phenomenon derived from an essential +quality of matter. Quite recently, Professor Rutherford has +demonstrated in a fine series of experiments that the alpha +particles of radium cease to ionize gases when they are made to +lose their velocity, but that they do not on that account cease to +exist. It may follow that many bodies emit similar particles +without being easily perceived to do so; since the electric action, +by which this phenomenon of radioactivity is generally manifested, +would, in this case, be but very weak.</p> +<p>If we thus believe radioactivity to be an absolutely general +phenomenon, we find ourselves face to face with a new problem. The +transformation of radioactive bodies can no longer be assimilated +to allotropic transformations, since thus no final form could ever +be attained, and the disaggregation would continue indefinitely up +to the complete dislocation of the atom.<a name="FNanchor_44_44" +id="FNanchor_44_44"></a> <a href="#Footnote_44_44" class= +"fnanchor">[44]</a> The phenomenon might, it is true, have a +duration of perhaps thousands of millions of centuries, but this +duration is but a minute in the infinity of time, and matters +little. Our habits of mind, if we adopt such a conception, will be +none the less very deeply disturbed. We shall have to abandon the +idea so instinctively dear to us that matter is the most stable +thing in the universe, and to admit, on the contrary, that all +bodies whatever are a kind of explosive decomposing with extreme +slowness. There is in this, whatever may have been said, nothing +contrary to any of the principles on which the science of +energetics rests; but an hypothesis of this nature carries with it +consequences which ought in the highest degree to interest the +philosopher, and we all know with what alluring boldness M. Gustave +Le Bon has developed all these consequences in his work on the +evolution of matter.<a name="FNanchor_45_45" id= +"FNanchor_45_45"></a><a href="#Footnote_45_45" class= +"fnanchor">[45]</a></p> +<p>There is hardly a physicist who does not at the present day +adopt in one shape or another the ballistic hypothesis. All new +facts are co-ordinated so happily by it, that it more and more +satisfies our minds; but it cannot be asserted that it forces +itself on our convictions with irresistible weight. Another point +of view appeared more plausible and simple at the outset, when +there seemed reason to consider the energy radiated by radioactive +bodies as inexhaustible. It was thought that the source of this +energy was to be looked for without the atom, and this idea may +perfectly well he maintained at the present day.</p> +<p>Radium on this hypothesis must be considered as a transformer +borrowing energy from the external medium and returning it in the +form of radiation. It is not impossible, even, to admit that the +energy which the atom of radium withdraws from the surrounding +medium may serve to keep up, not only the heat emitted and its +complex radiation, but also the dissociation, supposed to be +endothermic, of this atom. Such seems to be the idea of M. Debierne +and also of M. Sagnac. It does not seem to accord with the +experiments that this borrowed energy can be a part of the heat of +the ambient medium; and, indeed, such a phenomenon would be +contrary to the principle of Carnot if we wished (though we have +seen how disputable is this extension) to extend this principle to +the phenomena which are produced in the very bosom of the atom.</p> +<p>We may also address ourselves to a more noble form of energy, +and ask ourselves whether we are not, for the first time, in +presence of a transformation of gravitational energy. It may be +singular, but it is not absurd, to suppose that the unit of mass of +radium is not attached to the earth with the same intensity as an +inert body. M. Sagnac has commenced some experiments, as yet +unpublished, in order to study the laws of the fall of a fragment +of radium. They are necessarily very delicate, and the energetic +and ingenious physicist has not yet succeeded in finishing +them.<a name="FNanchor_46_46" id="FNanchor_46_46"></a> <a href= +"#Footnote_46_46" class="fnanchor">[46]</a> Let us suppose that he +succeeds in demonstrating that the intensity of gravity is less for +radium than for the platinum or the copper of which the pendulums +used to illustrate the law of Newton are generally made; it would +then be possible still to think that the laws of universal +attraction are perfectly exact as regards the stars, and that +ponderability is really a particular case of universal attraction, +while in the case of radioactive bodies part of the gravitational +energy is transformed in the course of its evolution and appears in +the form of active radiation.</p> +<p>But for this explanation to be admitted, it would evidently need +to be supported by very numerous facts. It might, no doubt, appear +still more probable that the energy borrowed from the external +medium by radium is one of those still unknown to us, but of which +a vague instinct causes us to suspect the existence around us. It +is indisputable, moreover, that the atmosphere in all directions is +furrowed with active radiations; those of radium may be secondary +radiations reflected by a kind of resonance phenomenon.</p> +<p>Certain experiments by Professors Elster and Geitel, however, +are not favourable to this point of view. If an active body be +surrounded by a radioactive envelope, a screen should prevent this +body from receiving any impression from outside, and yet there is +no diminution apparent in the activity presented by a certain +quantity of radium when it is lowered to a depth of 800 metres +under ground, in a region containing a notable quantity of +pitchblende. These negative results are, on the other hand, so many +successes for the partisans of the explanation of radioactivity by +atomic energy.</p> +<hr style="width: 65%;" /> +<h3><a name="CHAPTER_X" id="CHAPTER_X"></a>CHAPTER X</h3> +<h2>THE ETHER AND MATTER</h2> +<p class="textbold">§ 1. THE RELATIONS BETWEEN THE ETHER AND +MATTER</p> +<p>For some time past it has been the more or less avowed ambition +of physicists to construct with the particles of ether all possible +forms of corporeal existence; but our knowledge of the inmost +nature of things has hitherto seemed too limited for us to attempt +such an enterprise with any chance of success. The electronic +hypothesis, however, which has furnished a satisfactory image of +the most curious phenomena produced in the bosom of matter, has +also led to a more complete electromagnetic theory of the ether +than that of Maxwell, and this twofold result has given birth to +the hope of arriving by means of this hypothesis at a complete +co-ordination of the physical world.</p> +<p>The phenomena whose study may bring us to the very threshold of +the problem, are those in which the connections between matter and +the ether appear clearly and in a relatively simple manner. Thus in +the phenomena of emission, ponderable matter is seen to give birth +to waves which are transmitted by the ether, and by the phenomena +of absorption it is proved that these waves disappear and excite +modifications in the interior of the material bodies which receive +them. We here catch in operation actual reciprocal actions and +reactions between the ether and matter. If we could thoroughly +comprehend these actions, we should no doubt be in a position to +fill up the gap which separates the two regions separately +conquered by physical science.</p> +<p>In recent years numerous researches have supplied valuable +materials which ought to be utilized by those endeavouring to +construct a theory of radiation. We are, perhaps, still ill +informed as to the phenomena of luminescence in which undulations +are produced in a complex manner, as in the case of a stick of +moist phosphorus which is luminescent in the dark, or in that of a +fluorescent screen. But we are very well acquainted with emission +or absorption by incandescence, where the only transformation is +that of calorific into radiating energy, or <i>vice versa</i>. It +is in this case alone that can be correctly applied the celebrated +demonstration by which Kirchhoff established, by considerations +borrowed from thermodynamics, the proportional relations between +the power of emission and that of absorption.</p> +<p>In treating of the measurement of temperature, I have already +pointed out the experiments of Professors Lummer and Pringsheim and +the theoretical researches of Stephan and Professor Wien. We may +consider that at the present day the laws of the radiation of dark +bodies are tolerably well known, and, in particular, the manner in +which each elementary radiation increases with the temperature. A +few doubts, however, subsist with respect to the law of the +distribution of energy in the spectrum. In the case of real and +solid bodies the results are naturally less simple than in that of +dark bodies. One side of the question has been specially studied on +account of its great practical interest, that is to say, the fact +that the relation of the luminous energy to the total amount +radiated by a body varies with the nature of this last; and the +knowledge of the conditions under which this relation becomes most +considerable led to the discovery of incandescent lighting by gas +in the Auer-Welsbach mantle, and to the substitution for the carbon +thread in the electric light bulb of a filament of osmium or a +small rod of magnesium, as in the Nernst lamp. Careful measurements +effected by M. Fery have furnished, in particular, important +information on the radiation of the white oxides; but the phenomena +noticed have not yet found a satisfactory interpretation. Moreover, +the radiation of calorific origin is here accompanied by a more or +less important luminescence, and the problem becomes very +complex.</p> +<p>In the same way that, for the purpose of knowing the +constitution of matter, it first occurred to us to investigate +gases, which appear to be molecular edifices built on a more simple +and uniform plan than solids, we ought naturally to think that an +examination of the conditions in which emission and absorption are +produced by gaseous bodies might be eminently profitable, and might +perhaps reveal the mechanism by which the relations between the +molecule of the ether and the molecule of matter might be +established.</p> +<p>Unfortunately, if a gas is not absolutely incapable of emitting +some sort of rays by simple heat, the radiation thus produced, no +doubt by reason of the slightness of the mass in play, always +remains of moderate intensity. In nearly all the experiments, new +energies of chemical or electrical origin come into force. On +incandescence, luminescence is superposed; and the advantage which +might have been expected from the simplicity of the medium vanishes +through the complication of the circumstances in which the +phenomenon is produced.</p> +<p>Professor Pringsheim has succeeded, in certain cases, in finding +the dividing line between the phenomena of luminescence and that of +incandescence. Thus the former takes a predominating importance +when the gas is rendered luminous by electrical discharges, and +chemical transformations, especially, play a preponderant +rôle in the emission of the spectrum of flames which contain +a saline vapour. In all the ordinary experiments of spectrum +analysis the laws of Kirchhoff cannot therefore be considered as +established, and yet the relation between emission and absorption +is generally tolerably well verified. No doubt we are here in +presence of a kind of resonance phenomenon, the gaseous atoms +entering into vibration when solicited by the ether by a motion +identical with the one they are capable of communicating to it.</p> +<p>If we are not yet very far advanced in the study of the +mechanism of the production of the spectrum,<a name= +"FNanchor_47_47" id="FNanchor_47_47"></a><a href="#Footnote_47_47" +class="fnanchor">[47]</a> we are, on the other hand, well +acquainted with its constitution. The extreme confusion which the +spectra of the lines of the gases seemed to present is now, in +great part at least, cleared up. Balmer gave some time since, in +the case of the hydrogen spectrum, an empirical formula which +enabled the rays discovered later by an eminent astronomer, M. +Deslandres, to be represented; but since then, both in the cases of +line and band spectra, the labours of Professor Rydberg, of M. +Deslandres, of Professors Kayzer and Runge, and of M. Thiele, have +enabled us to comprehend, in their smallest details, the laws of +the distribution of lines and bands.</p> +<p>These laws are simple, but somewhat singular. The radiations +emitted by a gas cannot be compared to the notes to which a +sonorous body gives birth, nor even to the most complicated +vibrations of any elastic body. The number of vibrations of the +different rays are not the successive multiples of one and the same +number, and it is not a question of a fundamental radiation and its +harmonics, while—and this is an essential +difference—the number of vibrations of the radiation tend +towards a limit when the period diminishes infinitely instead of +constantly increasing, as would be the case with the vibrations of +sound.</p> +<p>Thus the assimilation of the luminous to the elastic vibration +is not correct. Once again we find that the ether does not behave +like matter which obeys the ordinary laws of mechanics, and every +theory must take full account of these curious peculiarities which +experiment reveals.</p> +<p>Another difference, likewise very important, between the +luminous and the sonorous vibrations, which also points out how +little analogous can be the constitutions of the media which +transmit the vibrations, appears in the phenomena of dispersion. +The speed of propagation, which, as we have seen when discussing +the measurement of the velocity of sound, depends very little on +the musical note, is not at all the same in the case of the various +radiations which can be propagated in the same substance. The index +of refraction varies with the duration of the period, or, if you +will, with the length of wave <i>in vacuo</i> which is proportioned +to this duration, since <i>in vacuo</i> the speed of propagation is +entirely the same for all vibrations.</p> +<p>Cauchy was the first to propose a theory on which other attempts +have been modelled; for example, the very interesting and simple +one of Briot. This last-named supposed that the luminous vibration +could not perceptibly drag with it the molecular material of the +medium across which it is propagated, but that matter, +nevertheless, reacts on the ether with an intensity proportional to +the elongation, in such a manner as tends to bring it back to its +position of equilibrium. With this simple hypothesis we can fairly +well interpret the phenomena of the dispersion of light in the case +of transparent substances; but far from well, as M. Carvallo has +noted in some extremely careful experiments, the dispersion of the +infra-red spectrum, and not at all the peculiarities presented by +absorbent substances.</p> +<p>M. Boussinesq arrives at almost similar results, by attributing +dispersion, on the other hand, to the partial dragging along of +ponderable matter and to its action on the ether. By combining, in +a measure, as was subsequently done by M. Boussinesq, the two +hypotheses, formulas can be established far better in accord with +all the known facts.</p> +<p>These facts are somewhat complex. It was at first thought that +the index always varied in inverse ratio to the wave-length, but +numerous substances have been discovered which present the +phenomenon of abnormal dispersion—that is to say, substances +in which certain radiations are propagated, on the contrary, the +more quickly the shorter their period. This is the case with gases +themselves, as demonstrated, for example, by a very elegant +experiment of M. Becquerel on the dispersion of the vapour of +sodium. Moreover, it may happen that yet more complications may be +met with, as no substance is transparent for the whole extent of +the spectrum. In the case of certain radiations the speed of +propagation becomes nil, and the index shows sometimes a maximum +and sometimes a minimum. All those phenomena are in close relation +with those of absorption.</p> +<p>It is, perhaps, the formula proposed by Helmholtz which best +accounts for all these peculiarities. Helmholtz came to establish +this formula by supposing that there is a kind of friction between +the ether and matter, which, like that exercised on a pendulum, +here produces a double effect, changing, on the one hand, the +duration of this oscillation, and, on the other, gradually damping +it. He further supposed that ponderable matter is acted on by +elastic forces. The theory of Helmholtz has the great advantage of +representing, not only the phenomena of dispersion, but also, as M. +Carvallo has pointed out, the laws of rotatory polarization, its +dispersion and other phenomena, among them the dichroism of the +rotatory media discovered by M. Cotton.</p> +<p>In the establishment of these theories, the language of ordinary +optics has always been employed. The phenomena are looked upon as +due to mechanical deformations or to movements governed by certain +forces. The electromagnetic theory leads, as we have seen, to the +employment of other images. M.H. Poincaré, and, after him, +Helmholtz, have both proposed electromagnetic theories of +dispersion. On examining things closely, it will be found that +there are not, in truth, in the two ways of regarding the problem, +two equivalent translations of exterior reality. The electrical +theory gives us to understand, much better than the mechanical one, +that <i>in vacuo</i> the dispersion ought to be strictly null, and +this absence of dispersion appears to be confirmed with +extraordinary precision by astronomical observations. Thus the +observation, often repeated, and at different times of year, proves +that in the case of the star Algol, the light of which takes at +least four years to reach us, no sensible difference in coloration +accompanies the changes in brilliancy.</p> +<p><br /></p> +<p class="textbold">§ 2. THE THEORY OF LORENTZ</p> +<p>Purely mechanical considerations have therefore failed to give +an entirely satisfactory interpretation of the phenomena in which +even the simplest relations between matter and the ether appear. +They would, evidently, be still more insufficient if used to +explain certain effects produced on matter by light, which could +not, without grave difficulties, be attributed to movement; for +instance, the phenomena of electrification under the influence of +certain radiations, or, again, chemical reactions such as +photographic impressions.</p> +<p>The problem had to be approached by another road. The +electromagnetic theory was a step in advance, but it comes to a +standstill, so to speak, at the moment when the ether penetrates +into matter. If we wish to go deeper into the inwardness of the +phenomena, we must follow, for example, Professor Lorentz or Dr +Larmor, and look with them for a mode of representation which +appears, besides, to be a natural consequence of the fundamental +ideas forming the basis of Hertz's experiments.</p> +<p>The moment we look upon a wave in the ether as an +electromagnetic wave, a molecule which emits light ought to be +considered as a kind of excitant. We are thus led to suppose that +in each radiating molecule there are one or several electrified +particles, animated with a to-and-fro movement round their +positions of equilibrium, and these particles are certainly +identical with those electrons the existence of which we have +already admitted for so many other reasons.</p> +<p>In the simplest theory, we will imagine an electron which may be +displaced from its position of equilibrium in all directions, and +is, in this displacement, submitted to attractions which +communicate to it a vibration like a pendulum. These movements are +equivalent to tiny currents, and the mobile electron, when animated +with a considerable velocity, must be sensitive to the action of +the magnet which modifies the form of the trajectory and the value +of the period. This almost direct consequence was perceived by +Lorentz, and it led him to the new idea that radiations emitted by +a body ought to be modified by the action of a strong +electromagnet.</p> +<p>An experiment enabled this prevision to be verified. It was +made, as is well known, as early as 1896 by Zeeman; and the +discovery produced a legitimate sensation. When a flame is +subjected to the action of a magnetic field, a brilliant line is +decomposed in conditions more or less complex which an attentive +study, however, allows us to define. According to whether the +observation is made in a plane normal to the magnetic field or in +the same direction, the line transforms itself into a triplet or +doublet, and the new lines are polarized rectilinearly or +circularly.</p> +<p>These are the precise phenomena which the calculation foretells: +the analysis of the modifications undergone by the light supplies, +moreover, valuable information on the electron itself. From the +direction of the circular vibrations of the greatest frequency we +can determine the sign of the electric charge in motion and we find +it to be negative. But, further than this, from the variation of +the period we can calculate the relation of the force acting on the +electron to its material mass, and, in addition, the relation of +the charge to the mass. We then find for this relation precisely +that value which we have already met with so many times. Such a +coincidence cannot be fortuitous, and we have the right to believe +that the electron revealed by the luminous wave which emanates from +it, is really the same as the one made known to us by the study of +the cathode rays and of the radioactive substances.</p> +<p>However, the elementary theory does not suffice to interpret the +complications which later experiments have revealed. The physicists +most qualified to effect measurements in these delicate optical +questions—M. Cornu, Mr Preston, M. Cotton, MM. Becquerel and +Deslandres, M. Broca, Professor Michelson, and others—have +pointed out some remarkable peculiarities. Thus in some cases the +number of the component rays dissociated by the magnetic field may +be very considerable.</p> +<p>The great modification brought to a radiation by the Zeeman +effect may, besides, combine itself with other phenomena, and alter +the light in a still more complicated manner. A pencil of polarized +light, as demonstrated by Signori Macaluzo and Corbino, undergoes, +in a magnetic field, modifications with regard to absorption and +speed of propagation.</p> +<p>Some ingenious researches by M. Becquerel and M. Cotton have +perfectly elucidated all these complications from an experimental +point of view. It would not be impossible to link together all +these phenomena without adopting the electronic hypothesis, by +preserving the old optical equations as modified by the terms +relating to the action of the magnetic field. This has actually +been done in some very remarkable work by M. Voigt, but we may +also, like Professor Lorentz, look for more general theories, in +which the essential image of the electrons shall be preserved, and +which will allow all the facts revealed by experiment to be +included.</p> +<p>We are thus led to the supposition that there is not in the atom +one vibrating electron only, but that there is to be found in it a +dynamical system comprising several material points which may be +subjected to varied movements. The neutral atom may therefore be +considered as composed of an immovable principal portion positively +charged, round which move, like satellites round a planet, several +negative electrons of very inferior mass. This conclusion leads us +to an interpretation in agreement with that which other phenomena +have already suggested.</p> +<p>These electrons, which thus have a variable velocity, generate +around themselves a transverse electromagnetic wave which is +propagated with the velocity of light; for the charged particle +becomes, as soon as it experiences a change of speed, the centre of +a radiation. Thus is explained the phenomenon of the emission of +radiations. In the same way, the movement of electrons may be +excited or modified by the electrical forces which exist in any +pencil of light they receive, and this pencil may yield up to them +a part of the energy it is carrying. This is the phenomenon of +absorption.</p> +<p>Professor Lorentz has not contented himself with thus explaining +all the mechanism of the phenomena of emission and absorption. He +has endeavoured to rediscover, by starting with the fundamental +hypothesis, the quantitative laws discovered by thermodynamics. He +succeeds in showing that, agreeably to the law of Kirchhoff, the +relation between the emitting and the absorbing power must be +independent of the special properties of the body under +observation, and he thus again meets with the laws of Planck and of +Wien: unfortunately the calculation can only be made in the case of +great wave-lengths, and grave difficulties exist. Thus it cannot be +very clearly explained why, by heating a body, the radiation is +displaced towards the side of the short wave-lengths, or, if you +will, why a body becomes luminous from the moment its temperature +has reached a sufficiently high degree. On the other hand, by +calculating the energy of the vibrating particles we are again led +to attribute to these particles the same constitution as that of +the electrons.</p> +<p>It is in the same way possible, as Professor Lorentz has shown, +to give a very satisfactory explanation of the thermo-electric +phenomena by supposing that the number of liberated electrons which +exist in a given metal at a given temperature has a determined +value varying with each metal, and is, in the case of each body, a +function of the temperature. The formula obtained, which is based +on these hypotheses, agrees completely with the classic results of +Clausius and of Lord Kelvin. Finally, if we recollect that the +phenomena of electric and calorific conductivity are perfectly +interpreted by the hypothesis of electrons, it will no longer be +possible to contest the importance of a theory which allows us to +group together in one synthesis so many facts of such diverse +origins.</p> +<p>If we study the conditions under which a wave excited by an +electron's variations in speed can be transmitted, they again bring +us face to face, and generally, with the results pointed out by the +ordinary electromagnetic theory. Certain peculiarities, however, +are not absolutely the same. Thus the theory of Lorentz, as well as +that of Maxwell, leads us to foresee that if an insulating mass be +caused to move in a magnetic field normally to its lines of force, +a displacement will be produced in this mass analogous to that of +which Faraday and Maxwell admitted the existence in the dielectric +of a charged condenser. But M.H. Poincaré has pointed out +that, according as we adopt one or other of these authors' points +of view, so the value of the displacement differs. This remark is +very important, for it may lead to an experiment which would enable +us to make a definite choice between the two theories.</p> +<p>To obtain the displacement estimated according to Lorentz, we +must multiply the displacement calculated according to Hertz by a +factor representing the relation between the difference of the +specific inductive capacities of the dielectric and of a vacuum, +and the first of these powers. If therefore we take as dielectric +the air of which the specific inductive capacity is perceptibly the +same as that of a vacuum, the displacement, according to the idea +of Lorentz, will be null; while, on the contrary, according to +Hertz, it will have a finite value. M. Blondlot has made the +experiment. He sent a current of air into a condenser placed in a +magnetic field, and was never able to notice the slightest trace of +electrification. No displacement, therefore, is effected in the +dielectric. The experiment being a negative one, is evidently less +convincing than one giving a positive result, but it furnishes a +very powerful argument in favour of the theory of Lorentz.</p> +<p>This theory, therefore, appears very seductive, yet it still +raises objections on the part of those who oppose to it the +principles of ordinary mechanics. If we consider, for instance, a +radiation emitted by an electron belonging to one material body, +but absorbed by another electron in another body, we perceive +immediately that, the propagation not being instantaneous, there +can be no compensation between the action and the reaction, which +are not simultaneous; and the principle of Newton thus seems to be +attacked. In order to preserve its integrity, it has to be admitted +that the movements in the two material substances are compensated +by that of the ether which separates these substances; but this +conception, although in tolerable agreement with the hypothesis +that the ether and matter are not of different essence, involves, +on a closer examination, suppositions hardly satisfactory as to the +nature of movements in the ether.</p> +<p>For a long time physicists have admitted that the ether as a +whole must be considered as being immovable and capable of serving, +so to speak, as a support for the axes of Galileo, in relation to +which axes the principle of inertia is applicable,—or better +still, as M. Painlevé has shown, they alone allow us to +render obedience to the principle of causality.</p> +<p>But if it were so, we might apparently hope, by experiments in +electromagnetism, to obtain absolute motion, and to place in +evidence the translation of the earth relatively to the ether. But +all the researches attempted by the most ingenious physicists +towards this end have always failed, and this tends towards the +idea held by many geometricians that these negative results are not +due to imperfections in the experiments, but have a deep and +general cause. Now Lorentz has endeavoured to find the conditions +in which the electromagnetic theory proposed by him might agree +with the postulate of the complete impossibility of determining +absolute motion. It is necessary, in order to realise this concord, +to imagine that a mobile system contracts very slightly in the +direction of its translation to a degree proportioned to the square +of the ratio of the velocity of transport to that of light. The +electrons themselves do not escape this contraction, although the +observer, since he participates in the same motion, naturally +cannot notice it. Lorentz supposes, besides, that all forces, +whatever their origin, are affected by a translation in the same +way as electromagnetic forces. M. Langevin and M. H. +Poincaré have studied this same question and have noted with +precision various delicate consequences of it. The singularity of +the hypotheses which we are thus led to construct in no way +constitutes an argument against the theory of Lorentz; but it has, +we must acknowledge, discouraged some of the more timid partisans +of this theory.<a name="FNanchor_48_48" id= +"FNanchor_48_48"></a><a href="#Footnote_48_48" class= +"fnanchor">[48]</a></p> +<br /> +<p class="textbold">§ 3. THE MASS OF ELECTRONS</p> +<p>Other conceptions, bolder still, are suggested by the results of +certain interesting experiments. The electron affords us the +possibility of considering inertia and mass to be no longer a +fundamental notion, but a consequence of the electromagnetic +phenomena.</p> +<p>Professor J.J. Thomson was the first to have the clear idea that +a part, at least, of the inertia of an electrified body is due to +its electric charge. This idea was taken up and precisely stated by +Professor Max Abraham, who, for the first time, was led to regard +seriously the seemingly paradoxical notion of mass as a function of +velocity. Consider a small particle bearing a given electric +charge, and let us suppose that this particle moves through the +ether. It is, as we know, equivalent to a current proportional to +its velocity, and it therefore creates a magnetic field the +intensity of which is likewise proportional to its velocity: to set +it in motion, therefore, there must be communicated to it over and +above the expenditure corresponding to the acquisition of its +ordinary kinetic energy, a quantity of energy proportional to the +square of its velocity. Everything, therefore, takes place as if, +by the fact of electrification, its capacity for kinetic energy and +its material mass had been increased by a certain constant +quantity. To the ordinary mass may be added, if you will, an +electromagnetic mass.</p> +<p>This is the state of things so long as the speed of the +translation of the particle is not very great, but they are no +longer quite the same when this particle is animated with a +movement whose rapidity becomes comparable to that with which light +is propagated.</p> +<p>The magnetic field created is then no longer a field in repose, +but its energy depends, in a complicated manner, on the velocity, +and the apparent increase in the mass of the particle itself +becomes a function of the velocity. More than this, this increase +may not be the same for the same velocity, but varies according to +whether the acceleration is parallel with or perpendicular to the +direction of this velocity. In other words, there seems to be a +longitudinal; and a transversal mass which need not be the +same.</p> +<p>All these results would persist even if the material mass were +very small relatively to the electromagnetic mass; and the electron +possesses some inertia even if its ordinary mass becomes slighter +and slighter. The apparent mass, it can be easily shown, increases +indefinitely when the velocity with which the electrified particle +is animated tends towards the velocity of light, and thus the work +necessary to communicate such a velocity to an electron would be +infinite. It is in consequence impossible that the speed of an +electron, in relation to the ether, can ever exceed, or even +permanently attain to, 300,000 kilometres per second.</p> +<p>All the facts thus predicted by the theory are confirmed by +experiment. There is no known process which permits the direct +measurement of the mass of an electron, but it is possible, as we +have seen, to measure simultaneously its velocity and the relation +of the electric charge to its mass. In the case of the cathode rays +emitted by radium, these measurements are particularly interesting, +for the reason that the rays which compose a pencil of cathode rays +are animated by very different speeds, as is shown by the size of +the stain produced on a photographic plate by a pencil of them at +first very constricted and subsequently dispersed by the action of +an electric or magnetic field. Professor Kaufmann has effected some +very careful experiments by a method he terms the method of crossed +spectra, which consists in superposing the deviations produced by a +magnetic and an electric field respectively acting in directions at +right angles one to another. He has thus been enabled by working +<i>in vacuo</i> to register the very different velocities which, +starting in the case of certain rays from about seven-tenths of the +velocity of light, attain in other cases to ninety-five hundredths +of it.</p> +<p>It is thus noted that the ratio of charge to mass—which +for ordinary speeds is constant and equal to that already found by +so many experiments—diminishes slowly at first, and then very +rapidly when the velocity of the ray increases and approaches that +of light. If we represent this variation by a curve, the shape of +this curve inclines us to think that the ratio tends toward zero +when the velocity tends towards that of light.</p> +<p>All the earlier experiments have led us to consider that the +electric charge was the same for all electrons, and it can hardly +be conceived that this charge can vary with the velocity. For in +order that the relation, of which one of the terms remains fixed, +should vary, the other term necessarily cannot remain constant. The +experiments of Professor Kaufmann, therefore, confirm the +previsions of Max Abraham's theory: the mass depends on the +velocity, and increases indefinitely in proportion as this velocity +approaches that of light. These experiments, moreover, allow the +numerical results of the calculation to be compared with the values +measured. This very satisfactory comparison shows that the apparent +total mass is sensibly equal to the electromagnetic mass; the +material mass of the electron is therefore nil, and the whole of +its mass is electromagnetic.</p> +<p>Thus the electron must be looked upon as a simple electric +charge devoid of matter. Previous examination has led us to +attribute to it a mass a thousand times less that that of the atom +of hydrogen, and a more attentive study shows that this mass was +fictitious. The electromagnetic phenomena which are produced when +the electron is set in motion or a change effected in its velocity, +simply have the effect, as it were, of simulating inertia, and it +is the inertia due to the charge which has caused us to be thus +deluded.</p> +<p>The electron is therefore simply a small volume determined at a +point in the ether, and possessing special properties; <a name= +"FNanchor_49_49" id="FNanchor_49_49"></a> <a href="#Footnote_49_49" +class="fnanchor">[49]</a> this point is propagated with a velocity +which cannot exceed that of light. When this velocity is constant, +the electron creates around it in its passage an electric and a +magnetic field; round this electrified centre there exists a kind +of wake, which follows it through the ether and does not become +modified so long as the velocity remains invariable. If other +electrons follow the first within a wire, their passage along the +wire will be what is called an electric current.</p> +<p>When the electron is subjected to an acceleration, a transverse +wave is produced, and an electromagnetic radiation is generated, of +which the character may naturally change with the manner in which +the speed varies. If the electron has a sufficiently rapid +periodical movement, this wave is a light wave; while if the +electron stops suddenly, a kind of pulsation is transmitted through +the ether, and thus we obtain Röntgen rays.</p> +<p><br /></p> +<p class="textbold">§ 4. NEW VIEWS ON THE CONSTITUTION OF THE +ETHER AND OF MATTER</p> +<p>New and valuable information is thus afforded us regarding the +properties of the ether, but will this enable us to construct a +material representation of this medium which fills the universe, +and so to solve a problem which has baffled, as we have seen, the +prolonged efforts of our predecessors?</p> +<p>Certain scholars seem to have cherished this hope. Dr. Larmor in +particular, as we have seen, has proposed a most ingenious image, +but one which is manifestly insufficient. The present tendency of +physicists rather tends to the opposite view; since they consider +matter as a very complex object, regarding which we wrongly imagine +ourselves to be well informed because we are so much accustomed to +it, and its singular properties end by seeming natural to us. But +in all probability the ether is, in its objective reality, much +more simple, and has a better right to be considered as +fundamental.</p> +<p>We cannot therefore, without being very illogical, define the +ether by material properties, and it is useless labour, condemned +beforehand to sterility, to endeavour to determine it by other +qualities than those of which experiment gives us direct and exact +knowledge.</p> +<p>The ether is defined when we know, in all its points, and in +magnitude and in direction, the two fields, electric and magnetic, +which may exist in it. These two fields may vary; we speak from +habit of a movement propagated in the ether, but the phenomenon +within the reach of experiment is the propagation of these +variations.</p> +<p>Since the electrons, considered as a modification of the ether +symmetrically distributed round a point, perfectly counterfeit that +inertia which is the fundamental property of matter, it becomes +very tempting to suppose that matter itself is composed of a more +or less complex assemblage of electrified centres in motion.</p> +<p>This complexity is, in general, very great, as is demonstrated +by the examination of the luminous spectra produced by the atoms, +and it is precisely because of the compensations produced between +the different movements that the essential properties of +matter—the law of the conservation of inertia, for +example—are not contrary to the hypothesis.</p> +<p>The forces of cohesion thus would be due to the mutual +attractions which occur in the electric and magnetic fields +produced in the interior of bodies; and it is even conceivable that +there may be produced, under the influence of these actions, a +tendency to determine orientation, that is to say, that a reason +can be seen why matter may be crystallised.<a name="FNanchor_50_50" +id="FNanchor_50_50"></a><a href="#Footnote_50_50" class= +"fnanchor">[50]</a></p> +<p>All the experiments effected on the conductivity of gases or +metals, and on the radiations of active bodies, have induced us to +regard the atom as being constituted by a positively charged centre +having practically the same magnitude as the atom itself, round +which the electrons gravitate; and it might evidently be supposed +that this positive centre itself preserves the fundamental +characteristics of matter, and that it is the electrons alone which +no longer possess any but electromagnetic mass.</p> +<p>We have but little information concerning these positive +particles, though they are met with in an isolated condition, as we +have seen, in the canal rays or in the X rays.<a name= +"FNanchor_51_51" id="FNanchor_51_51"></a><a href="#Footnote_51_51" +class="fnanchor">[51]</a> It has not hitherto been possible to +study them so successfully as the electrons themselves; but that +their magnitude causes them to produce considerable perturbations +in the bodies on which they fall is manifest by the secondary +emissions which complicate and mask the primitive phenomenon. There +are, however, strong reasons for thinking that these positive +centres are not simple. Thus Professor Stark attributes to them, +with experiments in proof of his opinion, the emission of the +spectra of the rays in Geissler tubes, and the complexity of the +spectrum discloses the complexity of the centre. Besides, certain +peculiarities in the conductivity of metals cannot be explained +without a supposition of this kind. So that the atom, deprived of +the cathode corpuscle, would be still liable to decomposition into +elements analogous to electrons and positively charged. +Consequently nothing prevents us supposing that this centre +likewise simulates inertia by its electromagnetic properties, and +is but a condition localised in the ether.</p> +<p>However this may be, the edifice thus constructed, being +composed of electrons in periodical motion, necessarily grows old. +The electrons become subject to accelerations which produce a +radiation towards the exterior of the atom; and certain of them may +leave the body, while the primitive stability is, in the end, no +longer assured, and a new arrangement tends to be formed. Matter +thus seems to us to undergo those transformations of which the +radio-active bodies have given us such remarkable examples.</p> +<p>We have already had, in fragments, these views on the +constitution of matter; a deeper study of the electron thus enables +us to take up a position from which we obtain a sharp, clear, and +comprehensive grasp of the whole and a glimpse of indefinite +horizons.</p> +<p>It would be advantageous, however, in order to strengthen this +position, that a few objections which still menace it should be +removed. The instability of the electron is not yet sufficiently +demonstrated. How is it that its charge does not waste itself away, +and what bonds assure the permanence of its constitution?</p> +<p>On the other hand, the phenomena of gravitation remain a +mystery. Lorentz has endeavoured to build up a theory in which he +explains attraction by supposing that two charges of similar sign +repel each other in a slightly less degree than that in which two +charges, equal but of contrary sign, attract each other, the +difference being, however, according to the calculation, much too +small to be directly observed. He has also sought to explain +gravitation by connecting it with the pressures which may be +produced on bodies by the vibratory movements which form very +penetrating rays. Recently M. Sutherland has imagined that +attraction is due to the difference of action in the convection +currents produced by the positive and negative corpuscles which +constitute the atoms of the stars, and are carried along by the +astronomical motions. But these hypotheses remain rather vague, and +many authors think, like M. Langevin, that gravitation must result +from some mode of activity of the ether totally different from the +electromagnetic mode.</p> +<hr style="width: 65%;" /> +<h3><a name="CHAPTER_XI" id="CHAPTER_XI"></a>CHAPTER XI</h3> +<h2>THE FUTURE OF PHYSICS</h2> +<p>It would doubtless be exceedingly rash, and certainly very +presumptuous, to seek to predict the future which may be reserved +for physics. The rôle of prophet is not a scientific one, and +the most firmly established previsions of to-day may be overthrown +by the reality of to-morrow.</p> +<p>Nevertheless, the physicist does not shun an extrapolation of +some little scope when it is not too far from the realms of +experiment; the knowledge of the evolution accomplished of late +years authorises a few suppositions as to the direction in which +progress may continue.</p> +<p>The reader who has deigned to follow me in the rapid excursion +we have just made through the domain of the science of Nature, will +doubtless bring back with him from his short journey the general +impression that the ancient limits to which the classic treatises +still delight in restricting the divers chapters of physics, are +trampled down in all directions.</p> +<p>The fine straight roads traced out by the masters of the last +century, and enlarged and levelled by the labour of such numbers of +workmen, are now joined together by a crowd of small paths which +furrow the field of physics. It is not only because they cover +regions as yet little explored where discoveries are more abundant +and more easy, that these cross-cuts are so frequent, but also +because a higher hope guides the seekers who engage in these new +routes.</p> +<p>In spite of the repeated failures which have followed the +numerous attempts of past times, the idea has not been abandoned of +one day conquering the supreme principle which must command the +whole of physics.</p> +<p>Some physicists, no doubt, think such a synthesis to be +impossible of realisation, and that Nature is infinitely complex; +but, notwithstanding all the reserves they may make, from the +philosophical point of view, as to the legitimacy of the process, +they do not hesitate to construct general hypotheses which, in +default of complete mental satisfaction, at least furnish them with +a highly convenient means of grouping an immense number of facts +till then scattered abroad.</p> +<p>Their error, if error there be, is beneficial, for it is one of +those that Kant would have classed among the fruitful illusions +which engender the indefinite progress of science and lead to great +and important co-ordinations.</p> +<p>It is, naturally, by the study of the relations existing between +phenomena apparently of very different orders that there can be any +hope of reaching the goal; and it is this which justifies the +peculiar interest accorded to researches effected in the debatable +land between domains hitherto considered as separate.</p> +<p>Among all the theories lately proposed, that of the ions has +taken a preponderant place; ill understood at first by some, +appearing somewhat singular, and in any case useless, to others, it +met at its inception, in France at least, with only very moderate +favour.</p> +<p>To-day things have greatly changed, and those even who ignored +it have been seduced by the curious way in which it adapts itself +to the interpretation of the most recent experiments on very +different subjects. A very natural reaction has set in; and I might +almost say that a question of fashion has led to some +exaggerations.</p> +<p>The electron has conquered physics, and many adore the new idol +rather blindly. Certainly we can only bow before an hypothesis +which enables us to group in the same synthesis all the discoveries +on electric discharges and on radioactive substances, and which +leads to a satisfactory theory of optics and of electricity; while +by the intermediary of radiating heat it seems likely to embrace +shortly the principles of thermodynamics also. Certainly one must +admire the power of a creed which penetrates also into the domain +of mechanics and furnishes a simple representation of the essential +properties of matter; but it is right not to lose sight of the fact +that an image may be a well-founded appearance, but may not be +capable of being exactly superposed on the objective reality.</p> +<p>The conception of the atom of electricity, the foundation of the +material atoms, evidently enables us to penetrate further into +Nature's secrets than our predecessors; but we must not be +satisfied with words, and the mystery is not solved when, by a +legitimate artifice, the difficulty has simply been thrust further +back. We have transferred to an element ever smaller and smaller +those physical qualities which in antiquity were attributed to the +whole of a substance; and then we shifted them later to those +chemical atoms which, united together, constitute this whole. +To-day we pass them on to the electrons which compose these atoms. +The indivisible is thus rendered, in a way, smaller and smaller, +but we are still unacquainted with what its substance may be. The +notion of an electric charge which we substitute for that of a +material mass will permit phenomena to be united which we thought +separate, but it cannot be considered a definite explanation, or as +the term at which science must stop. It is probable, however, that +for a few years still physics will not travel beyond it. The +present hypothesis suffices for grouping known facts, and it will +doubtless enable many more to be foreseen, while new successes will +further increase its possessions.</p> +<p>Then the day will arrive when, like all those which have shone +before it, this seductive hypothesis will lead to more errors than +discoveries. It will, however, have been improved, and it will have +become a very vast and very complete edifice which some will not +willingly abandon; for those who have made to themselves a +comfortable dwelling-place on the ruins of ancient monuments are +often too loth to leave it.</p> +<p>In that day the searchers who were in the van of the march after +truth will be caught up and even passed by others who will have +followed a longer, but perhaps surer road. We also have seen at +work those prudent physicists who dreaded too daring creeds, and +who sought only to collect all the documentary evidence possible, +or only took for their guide a few principles which were to them a +simple generalisation of facts established by experiments; and we +have been able to prove that they also were effecting good and +highly useful work.</p> +<p>Neither the former nor the latter, however, carry out their work +in an isolated way, and it should be noted that most of the +remarkable results of these last years are due to physicists who +have known how to combine their efforts and to direct their +activity towards a common object, while perhaps it may not be +useless to observe also that progress has been in proportion to the +material resources of our laboratories.</p> +<p>It is probable that in the future, as in the past, the greatest +discoveries, those which will suddenly reveal totally unknown +regions, and open up entirely new horizons, will be made by a few +scholars of genius who will carry on their patient labour in +solitary meditation, and who, in order to verify their boldest +conceptions, will no doubt content themselves with the most simple +and least costly experimental apparatus. Yet for their discoveries +to yield their full harvest, for the domain to be systematically +worked and desirable results obtained, there will be more and more +required the association of willing minds, the solidarity of +intelligent scholars, and it will be also necessary for these last +to have at their disposal the most delicate as well as the most +powerful instruments. These are conditions paramount at the present +day for continuous progress in experimental science.</p> +<p>If, as has already happened, unfortunately, in the history of +science, these conditions are not complied with; if the freedoms of +the workers are trammelled, their unity disturbed, and if material +facilities are too parsimoniously afforded them,—evolution, +at present so rapid, may be retarded, and those retrogressions +which, by-the-by, have been known in all evolutions, may occur, +although even then hope in the future would not be abolished for +ever.</p> +<p>There are no limits to progress, and the field of our +investigations has no boundaries. Evolution will continue with +invincible force. What we to-day call the unknowable, will retreat +further and further before science, which will never stay her +onward march. Thus physics will give greater and increasing +satisfaction to the mind by furnishing new interpretations of +phenomena; but it will accomplish, for the whole of society, more +valuable work still, by rendering, by the improvements it suggests, +life every day more easy and more agreeable, and by providing +mankind with weapons against the hostile forces of Nature.</p> +FOOTNOTES +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a name="Footnote_1_1" id="Footnote_1_1"></a> <a href= +"#FNanchor_1_1"><span class="label">[1]</span></a> <i>I.e.</i>, the +time-curve.—ED.</p> +</div> +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a name="Footnote_2_2" id="Footnote_2_2"></a><a href= +"#FNanchor_2_2"><span class="label">[2]</span></a> The author seems +to refer to the fact that in the standard metre, the measurement is +taken from the central one of three marks at each end of the bar. +The transverse section of the bar is an X, and the reading is made +by a microscope.—ED.</p> +</div> +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a name="Footnote_3_3" id="Footnote_3_3"></a> <a href= +"#FNanchor_3_3"><span class="label">[3]</span></a> <i>I.e.</i> +1/2000 of a millimetre.—ED.</p> +</div> +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a name="Footnote_4_4" id="Footnote_4_4"></a> <a href= +"#FNanchor_4_4"><span class="label">[4]</span></a> These are the +magnitudes and units adopted at the International Congress of +Electricians in 1904. For their definition and explanation, see +Demanet, <i>Notes de Physique Expérimentale</i> (Louvain, +1905), t. iv. p. 8.—ED.</p> +</div> +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a name="Footnote_5_5" id="Footnote_5_5"></a> <a href= +"#FNanchor_5_5"><span class="label">[5]</span></a> "Nothing is +created; nothing is lost"—ED.</p> +</div> +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a name="Footnote_6_6" id="Footnote_6_6"></a> <a href= +"#FNanchor_6_6"><span class="label">[6]</span></a> By isothermal +diagram is meant the pattern or complex formed when the isothermal +lines are arranged in curves of which the pressure is the ordinate +and the volume the abscissa.—ED.</p> +</div> +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a name="Footnote_7_7" id="Footnote_7_7"></a> <a href= +"#FNanchor_7_7"><span class="label">[7]</span></a> Mr Preston thus +puts it: "The law [of corresponding states] seems to be not quite, +but very nearly true for these substances [<i>i.e.</i> the halogen +derivatives of benzene]; but in the case of the other substances +examined, the majority of these generalizations were either only +roughly true or altogether departed from" (<i>Theory of Heat</i>, +London, 1904, p. 514.)—ED.</p> +</div> +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a name="Footnote_8_8" id="Footnote_8_8"></a> <a href= +"#FNanchor_8_8"><span class="label">[8]</span></a> Methode avec +retour en arriere.—ED</p> +</div> +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a name="Footnote_9_9" id="Footnote_9_9"></a> <a href= +"#FNanchor_9_9"><span class="label">[9]</span></a> Professor Soddy, +in a paper read before the Royal Society on the 15th November 1906, +warns experimenters against vacua created by charcoal cooled in +liquid air (the method referred-to in the text), unless as much of +the air as possible is first removed with a pump and replaced by +some argon-free gas. According to him, neither helium nor argon is +absorbed by charcoal. By the use of electrically-heated calcium, he +claims to have produced an almost perfect vacuum.—ED.</p> +</div> +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a name="Footnote_10_10" id="Footnote_10_10"></a> <a href= +"#FNanchor_10_10"><span class="label">[10]</span></a> Another view, +viz. that these inert gases are a kind of waste product of +radioactive changes, is also gaining ground. The discovery of the +radioactive mineral malacone, which gives off both helium and +argon, goes to support this. See Messrs Ketchin and Winterson's +paper on the subject at the Chemical Society, 18th October +1906.—ED.</p> +</div> +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a name="Footnote_11_11" id="Footnote_11_11"></a> <a href= +"#FNanchor_11_11"><span class="label">[11]</span></a> M. +Poincaré is here in error. Helium has never been +liquefied.—ED.</p> +</div> +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a name="Footnote_12_12" id="Footnote_12_12"></a> <a href= +"#FNanchor_12_12"><span class="label">[12]</span></a> Professor +Quincke's last hypothesis is that all liquids on solidifying pass +through a stage intermediate between solid and liquid, in which +they form what he calls "foam-cells," and assume a viscous +structure resembling that of jelly. See <i>Proc. Roy. Soc. A.</i>, +23rd July 1906.—ED.</p> +</div> +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a name="Footnote_13_13" id="Footnote_13_13"></a> <a href= +"#FNanchor_13_13"><span class="label">[13]</span></a> The metal +known as "invar."—ED.</p> +</div> +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a name="Footnote_14_14" id="Footnote_14_14"></a> <a href= +"#FNanchor_14_14"><span class="label">[14]</span></a> The "second +principle" referred to has been thus enunciated: "In every engine +that produces work there is a fall of temperature, and the maximum +output of a perfect engine—<i>i.e.</i> the ratio between the +heat consumed in work and the heat supplied—depends only on +the extreme temperatures between which the fluid is +evolved."—Demanet, <i>Notes de Physique +Expérimentale</i>, Louvain, 1905, fasc. 2, p. 147. Clausius +put it in a negative form, as thus: No engine can of itself, +without the aid of external agency, transfer heat from a body at +low temperature to a body at a high temperature. <i>Cf.</i> Ganot's +<i>Physics</i>, 17th English edition, § 508.—ED.</p> +</div> +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a name="Footnote_15_15" id="Footnote_15_15"></a> <a href= +"#FNanchor_15_15"><span class="label">[15]</span></a> See next +note.—ED.</p> +</div> +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a name="Footnote_16_16" id="Footnote_16_16"></a> <a href= +"#FNanchor_16_16"><span class="label">[16]</span></a> M. Stephane +Leduc, Professor of Biology of Nantes, has made many experiments in +this connection, and the artificial cells exhibited by him to the +Association française pour l'avancement des Sciences, at +their meeting at Grenoble in 1904 and reproduced in their "Actes," +are particularly noteworthy.—ED.</p> +</div> +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a name="Footnote_17_17" id="Footnote_17_17"></a> <a href= +"#FNanchor_17_17"><span class="label">[17]</span></a> That is, +without receiving or emitting any heat.—ED.</p> +</div> +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a name="Footnote_18_18" id="Footnote_18_18"></a> <a href= +"#FNanchor_18_18"><span class="label">[18]</span></a> Dissociation +must be distinguished from decomposition, which is what occurs when +the whole of a particle (compound, molecule, atom, etc.) breaks up +into its component parts. In dissociation the breaking up is only +partial, and the resultant consists of a mixture of decomposed and +undecomposed parts. See Ganot's Physics, 17th English edition, +§ 395, for examples.—ED.</p> +</div> +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a name="Footnote_19_19" id="Footnote_19_19"></a> <a href= +"#FNanchor_19_19"><span class="label">[19]</span></a> The valency +or atomicity of an element may be defined as the power it possesses +of entering into compounds in a certain fixed proportion. As +hydrogen is generally taken as the standard, in practice the +valency of an atom is the number of hydrogen atoms it will combine +with or replace. Thus chlorine and the rest of the halogens, the +atoms of which combine with one atom of hydrogen, are called +univalent, oxygen a bivalent element, and so on.—ED.</p> +</div> +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a name="Footnote_20_20" id="Footnote_20_20"></a> <a href= +"#FNanchor_20_20"><span class="label">[20]</span></a> Since this +was written, however, men of science have become less unanimous +than they formerly were on this point. The veteran chemist +Professor Mendeléeff has given reasons for thinking that the +ether is an inert gas with an atomic weight a million times less +than that of hydrogen, and a velocity of 2250 kilometres per second +(<i>Principles of Chemistry</i>, Eng. ed., 1905, vol. ii. p. 526). +On the other hand, the well-known physicist Dr A.H. Bucherer, +speaking at the Naturforscherversammlung, held at Stuttgart in +1906, declared his disbelief in the existence of the ether, which +he thought could not be reconciled at once with the Maxwellian +theory and the known facts.—ED.</p> +</div> +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a name="Footnote_21_21" id="Footnote_21_21"></a> <a href= +"#FNanchor_21_21"><span class="label">[21]</span></a> A natural +chlorate of potassium, generally of volcanic origin.—ED.</p> +</div> +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a name="Footnote_22_22" id="Footnote_22_22"></a> <a href= +"#FNanchor_22_22"><span class="label">[22]</span></a> That is to +say, he reflected the beam of polarized light by a mirror placed at +that angle. See Turpain, <i>Leçons élementaires de +Physique</i>, t. ii. p. 311, for details of the +experiment.—ED.</p> +</div> +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a name="Footnote_23_23" id="Footnote_23_23"></a> <a href= +"#FNanchor_23_23"><span class="label">[23]</span></a> It will no +doubt be a shock to those whom Professor Henry Armstrong has lately +called the "mathematically-minded" to find a member of the +Poincaré family speaking disrespectfully of the science they +have done so much to illustrate. One may perhaps compare the +expression in the text with M. Henri Poincaré's remark in +his last allocution to the Académie des Sciences, that +"Mathematics are sometimes a nuisance, and even a danger, when they +induce us to affirm more than we know" (<i>Comptes-rendus</i>, 17th +December 1906).</p> +</div> +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a name="Footnote_24_24" id="Footnote_24_24"></a> <a href= +"#FNanchor_24_24"><span class="label">[24]</span></a> See footnote +3.</p> +</div> +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a name="Footnote_25_25" id="Footnote_25_25"></a> <a href= +"#FNanchor_25_25"><span class="label">[25]</span></a> <i>I.e.</i> +10,000 metres.—ED.</p> +</div> +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a name="Footnote_26_26" id="Footnote_26_26"></a> <a href= +"#FNanchor_26_26"><span class="label">[26]</span></a> By this M. +Poincaré appears to mean a radiometer in which the vanes are +not entirely free to move as in the radiometer of Crookes but are +suspended by one or two threads as in the instrument devised by +Professor Poynting.—ED.</p> +</div> +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a name="Footnote_27_27" id="Footnote_27_27"></a> <a href= +"#FNanchor_27_27"><span class="label">[27]</span></a> See +especially the experiments of Professor E. Marx (Vienna), +<i>Annalen der Physik</i>, vol. xx. (No. 9 of 1906), pp. 677 <i>et +seq.</i>, which seem conclusive on this point.—ED.</p> +</div> +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a name="Footnote_28_28" id="Footnote_28_28"></a> <a href= +"#FNanchor_28_28"><span class="label">[28]</span></a> M. Sagnac +(<i>Le Radium</i>, Jan. 1906, p. 14), following perhaps Professors +Elster and Geitel, has lately taken up this idea +anew.—ED.</p> +</div> +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a name="Footnote_29_29" id="Footnote_29_29"></a> <a href= +"#FNanchor_29_29"><span class="label">[29]</span></a> At least, so +long as it is not introduced between the two coatings of a +condenser having a difference of potential sufficient to overcome +what M. Bouty calls its dielectric cohesion. We leave on one side +this phenomenon, regarding which M. Bouty has arrived at extremely +important results by a very remarkable series of experiments; but +this question rightly belongs to a special study of electrical +phenomena which is not yet written.</p> +</div> +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a name="Footnote_30_30" id="Footnote_30_30"></a> <a href= +"#FNanchor_30_30"><span class="label">[30]</span></a> A full +account of these experiments, which were executed at the Cavendish +Laboratory, is to be found in <i>Philosophical Transactions</i>, +A., vol. cxcv. (1901), pp. 193 <i>et seq</i>.—ED.</p> +</div> +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a name="Footnote_31_31" id="Footnote_31_31"></a> <a href= +"#FNanchor_31_31"><span class="label">[31]</span></a> The whole of +this argument is brilliantly set forth by Professor Lorentz in a +lecture delivered to the Electrotechnikerverein at Berlin in +December 1904, and reprinted, with additions, in the <i>Archives +Néerlandaises</i> of 1906.—ED.</p> +</div> +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a name="Footnote_32_32" id="Footnote_32_32"></a> <a href= +"#FNanchor_32_32"><span class="label">[32]</span></a> In his work +on <i>L'Évolution de la Matière</i>, M. Gustave Le +Bon recalls that in 1897 he published several notes in the +Académie des Sciences, in which he asserted that the +properties of uranium were only a particular case of a very general +law, and that the radiations emitted did not polarize, and were +akin by their properties to the X rays.</p> +</div> +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a name="Footnote_33_33" id="Footnote_33_33"></a> <a href= +"#FNanchor_33_33"><span class="label">[33]</span></a> Polonium has +now been shown to be no new element, but one of the transformation +products of radium. Radium itself is also thought to be derived in +some manner, not yet ascertained, from uranium. The same is the +case with actinium, which is said to come in the long run from +uranium, but not so directly as does radium. All this is described +in Professor Rutherford's <i>Radioactive Transformations</i> +(London, 1906).—ED.</p> +</div> +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a name="Footnote_34_34" id="Footnote_34_34"></a> <a href= +"#FNanchor_34_34"><span class="label">[34]</span></a> This is +admitted by Professor Rutherford (<i>Radio-Activity</i>, Camb., +1904, p. 141) and Professor Soddy (<i>Radio-Activity</i>, London, +1904, p. 66). Neither Mr Whetham, in his Recent <i>Development of +Physical Science</i> (London, 1904) nor the Hon. R.J. Strutt in +<i>The Becquerel Rays</i> (London, same date), both of whom deal +with the historical side of the subject, seem to have noticed the +fact.—ED.</p> +</div> +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a name="Footnote_35_35" id="Footnote_35_35"></a> <a href= +"#FNanchor_35_35"><span class="label">[35]</span></a> It has now +been shown that polonium when freshly separated emits beta rays +also; see Dr Logeman's paper in <i>Proceedings of the Royal +Society</i>, A., 6th September 1906.—ED.</p> +</div> +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a name="Footnote_36_36" id="Footnote_36_36"></a> <a href= +"#FNanchor_36_36"><span class="label">[36]</span></a> According to +Professor Rutherford, in 3.77 days.—ED</p> +</div> +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a name="Footnote_37_37" id="Footnote_37_37"></a> <a href= +"#FNanchor_37_37"><span class="label">[37]</span></a> Professor +Rutherford has lately stated that uranium may possibly produce an +emanation, but that its rate of decay must be too swift for its +presence to be verified (see <i>Radioactive Transformations</i>, p. +161).—ED.</p> +</div> +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a name="Footnote_38_38" id="Footnote_38_38"></a> <a href= +"#FNanchor_38_38"><span class="label">[38]</span></a> An actinium X +was also discovered by Professor Giesel (<i>Jahrbuch d. +Radioaktivitat</i>, i. p. 358, 1904). Since the above was written, +another product has been found to intervene between the X substance +and the emanation in the case of actinium and thorium. They have +been named radio-actinium and radio-thorium +respectively.—ED.</p> +</div> +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a name="Footnote_39_39" id="Footnote_39_39"></a> <a href= +"#FNanchor_39_39"><span class="label">[39]</span></a> Such a table +is given on p. 169 of Rutherford's <i>Radioactive +Transformations</i>.—ED.</p> +</div> +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a name="Footnote_40_40" id="Footnote_40_40"></a> <a href= +"#FNanchor_40_40"><span class="label">[40]</span></a> This opinion, +no doubt formed when Sir William Ramsay's discovery of the +formation of helium from the radium emanation was first made known, +is now less tenable. The latest theory is that the alpha particle +is in fact an atom of helium, and that the final transformation +product of radium and the other radioactive substances is lead. Cf. +Rutherford, <i>op. cit. passim.</i>—ED.</p> +</div> +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a name="Footnote_41_41" id="Footnote_41_41"></a> <a href= +"#FNanchor_41_41"><span class="label">[41]</span></a> See +<i>Radioactive Transformations</i> (p. 251). Professor Rutherford +says that "each of the alpha ray products present in one gram of +radium product (<i>sic</i>) expels 6.2 x 10<sup>10</sup> alpha +particles per second." He also remarks on "the experimental +difficulty of accurately determining the number of alpha particles +expelled from radium per second."—ED.</p> +</div> +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a name="Footnote_42_42" id="Footnote_42_42"></a> <a href= +"#FNanchor_42_42"><span class="label">[42]</span></a> See +Rutherford, <i>op. cit.</i> p. 150.—ED.</p> +</div> +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a name="Footnote_43_43" id="Footnote_43_43"></a> <a href= +"#FNanchor_43_43"><span class="label">[43]</span></a> This view of +the case has been made very clear by M. Gustave le Bon in +<i>L'Évolution de la Matière</i> (Paris, 1906). See +especially pp. 36-52, where the amount of the supposed intra-atomic +energy is calculated.—ED.</p> +</div> +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a name="Footnote_44_44" id="Footnote_44_44"></a> <a href= +"#FNanchor_44_44"><span class="label">[44]</span></a> This is the +main contention of M. Gustave Le Bon in his work last +quoted.—ED.</p> +</div> +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a name="Footnote_45_45" id="Footnote_45_45"></a> <a href= +"#FNanchor_45_45"><span class="label">[45]</span></a> See last +note.—ED.</p> +</div> +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a name="Footnote_46_46" id="Footnote_46_46"></a> <a href= +"#FNanchor_46_46"><span class="label">[46]</span></a> In reality M. +Sagnac operated in the converse manner. He took two equal +<i>weights</i> of a salt of radium and a salt of barium, which he +made oscillate one after the other in a torsion balance. Had the +durations of oscillation been different, it might be concluded that +the mechanical mass is not the same for radium as for barium.</p> +</div> +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a name="Footnote_47_47" id="Footnote_47_47"></a> <a href= +"#FNanchor_47_47"><span class="label">[47]</span></a> Many theories +as to the cause of the lines and bands of the spectrum have been +put forward since this was written, among which that of Professor +Stark (for which see <i>Physikalische Zeitschrift</i> for 1906, +<i>passim</i>) is perhaps the most advanced. That of M. Jean +Becquerel, which would attribute it to the vibration within the +atom of both negative and positive electrons, also deserves notice. +A popular account of this is given in the <i>Athenæum</i> of +20th April 1907.—ED.</p> +</div> +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a name="Footnote_48_48" id="Footnote_48_48"></a> <a href= +"#FNanchor_48_48"><span class="label">[48]</span></a> An objection +not here noticed has lately been formulated with much frankness by +Professor Lorentz himself. It is one of the pillars of his theory +that only the negative electrons move when an electric current +passes through a metal, and that the positive electrons (if any +such there be) remain motionless. Yet in the experiment known as +Hall's, the current is deflected by the magnetic field to one side +of the strip in certain metals, and to the opposite side in others. +This seems to show that in certain cases the positive electrons +move instead of the negative, and Professor Lorentz confesses that +up to the present he can find no valid argument against this. See +<i>Archives Néerlandaises</i> 1906, parts 1 and +2.—ED.</p> +</div> +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a name="Footnote_49_49" id="Footnote_49_49"></a> <a href= +"#FNanchor_49_49"><span class="label">[49]</span></a> This cannot +be said to be yet completely proved. <i>Cf</i>. Sir Oliver Lodge, +<i>Electrons</i>, London, 1906, p. 200.—ED.</p> +</div> +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a name="Footnote_50_50" id="Footnote_50_50"></a> <a href= +"#FNanchor_50_50"><span class="label">[50]</span></a> The reader +should, however, be warned that a theory has lately been put forth +which attempts to account for crystallisation on purely mechanical +grounds. See Messrs Barlow and Pope's "Development of the Atomic +Theory" in the <i>Transactions of the Chemical Society</i>, +1906.—ED.</p> +</div> +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a name="Footnote_51_51" id="Footnote_51_51"></a><a href= +"#FNanchor_51_51"><span class="label">[51]</span></a> There is much +reason for thinking that the canal rays do not contain positive +particles alone, but are accompanied by negative electrons of slow +velocity. The X rays are thought, as has been said above, to +contain neither negative nor positive particles, but to be merely +pulses in the ether.—ED.</p> +</div> + +<p> </p> +<hr class="full" /> +<p>***END OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE NEW PHYSICS AND ITS EVOLUTION***</p> +<p>******* This file should be named 15207-h.txt or 15207-h.zip *******</p> +<p>This and all associated files of various formats will be found in:<br /> +<a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/dirs/1/5/2/0/15207">https://www.gutenberg.org/1/5/2/0/15207</a></p> +<p>Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions +will be renamed.</p> + +<p>Creating the works from public domain print editions means that no +one owns a United States copyright in these works, so the Foundation +(and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United States without +permission and without paying copyright royalties. Special rules, +set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license, apply to +copying and distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works to +protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm concept and trademark. Project +Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if you +charge for the eBooks, unless you receive specific permission. If you +do not charge anything for copies of this eBook, complying with the +rules is very easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose +such as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and +research. They may be modified and printed and given away--you may do +practically ANYTHING with public domain eBooks. Redistribution is +subject to the trademark license, especially commercial +redistribution.</p> + + + +<pre> +*** START: FULL LICENSE *** + +THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE +PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK + +To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free +distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work +(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project +Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full Project +Gutenberg-tm License (available with this file or online at +<a href="https://gutenberg.org/license">https://gutenberg.org/license)</a>. + + +Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic works + +1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to +and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property +(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all +the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or destroy +all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your possession. +If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the +terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or +entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8. + +1.B. "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark. It may only be +used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who +agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few +things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works +even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See +paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement +and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works. See paragraph 1.E below. + +1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the Foundation" +or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection of Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic works. Nearly all the individual works in the +collection are in the public domain in the United States. If an +individual work is in the public domain in the United States and you are +located in the United States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from +copying, distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative +works based on the work as long as all references to Project Gutenberg +are removed. Of course, we hope that you will support the Project +Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting free access to electronic works by +freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm works in compliance with the terms of +this agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with +the work. You can easily comply with the terms of this agreement by +keeping this work in the same format with its attached full Project +Gutenberg-tm License when you share it without charge with others. + +1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern +what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are in +a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States, check +the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this agreement +before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, distributing or +creating derivative works based on this work or any other Project +Gutenberg-tm work. The Foundation makes no representations concerning +the copyright status of any work in any country outside the United +States. + +1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg: + +1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate +access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear prominently +whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work on which the +phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the phrase "Project +Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed, viewed, +copied or distributed: + +This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with +almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or +re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included +with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org + +1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is derived +from the public domain (does not contain a notice indicating that it is +posted with permission of the copyright holder), the work can be copied +and distributed to anyone in the United States without paying any fees +or charges. If you are redistributing or providing access to a work +with the phrase "Project Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the +work, you must comply either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1 +through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the +Project Gutenberg-tm trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or +1.E.9. + +1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted +with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution +must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any additional +terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms will be linked +to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works posted with the +permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of this work. + +1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm +License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this +work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm. + +1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this +electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without +prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with +active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project +Gutenberg-tm License. + +1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary, +compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including any +word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access to or +distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format other than +"Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official version +posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm web site (www.gutenberg.org), +you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a +copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon +request, of the work in its original "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other +form. Any alternate format must include the full Project Gutenberg-tm +License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1. + +1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying, +performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works +unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9. + +1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing +access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works provided +that + +- You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from + the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method + you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is + owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he + has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the + Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments + must be paid within 60 days following each date on which you + prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your periodic tax + returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked as such and + sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the + address specified in Section 4, "Information about donations to + the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation." + +- You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies + you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he + does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm + License. You must require such a user to return or + destroy all copies of the works possessed in a physical medium + and discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of + Project Gutenberg-tm works. + +- You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any + money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the + electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days + of receipt of the work. + +- You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free + distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works. + +1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set +forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from +both the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and Michael +Hart, the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark. Contact the +Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below. + +1.F. + +1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable +effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread +public domain works in creating the Project Gutenberg-tm +collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may contain +"Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or +corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual +property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other medium, a +computer virus, or computer codes that damage or cannot be read by +your equipment. + +1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right +of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project +Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project +Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all +liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal +fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT +LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE +PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH F3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE +TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE +LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR +INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH +DAMAGE. + +1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a +defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can +receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a +written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you +received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium with +your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you with +the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu of a +refund. If you received the work electronically, the person or entity +providing it to you may choose to give you a second opportunity to +receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If the second copy +is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing without further +opportunities to fix the problem. + +1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth +in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS,' WITH NO OTHER +WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO +WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTIBILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE. + +1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied +warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages. +If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the +law of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be +interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by +the applicable state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any +provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions. + +1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the +trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone +providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in accordance +with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the production, +promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works, +harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees, +that arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do +or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg-tm +work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or deletions to any +Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any Defect you cause. + + +Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm + +Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of +electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of computers +including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It exists +because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations from +people in all walks of life. + +Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the +assistance they need, is critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's +goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will +remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project +Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure +and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future generations. +To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation +and how your efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4 +and the Foundation web page at https://www.gutenberg.org/fundraising/pglaf. + + +Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive +Foundation + +The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non profit +501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the +state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal +Revenue Service. The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification +number is 64-6221541. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg +Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent +permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state's laws. + +The Foundation's principal office is located at 4557 Melan Dr. S. +Fairbanks, AK, 99712., but its volunteers and employees are scattered +throughout numerous locations. Its business office is located at +809 North 1500 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887, email +business@pglaf.org. Email contact links and up to date contact +information can be found at the Foundation's web site and official +page at https://www.gutenberg.org/about/contact + +For additional contact information: + Dr. Gregory B. Newby + Chief Executive and Director + gbnewby@pglaf.org + +Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg +Literary Archive Foundation + +Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without wide +spread public support and donations to carry out its mission of +increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be +freely distributed in machine readable form accessible by the widest +array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations +($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt +status with the IRS. + +The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating +charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United +States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a +considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up +with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations +where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To +SEND DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any +particular state visit https://www.gutenberg.org/fundraising/pglaf + +While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we +have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition +against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who +approach us with offers to donate. + +International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make +any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from +outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff. + +Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation +methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other +ways including including checks, online payments and credit card +donations. To donate, please visit: +https://www.gutenberg.org/fundraising/donate + + +Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works. + +Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project Gutenberg-tm +concept of a library of electronic works that could be freely shared +with anyone. For thirty years, he produced and distributed Project +Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer support. + +Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed +editions, all of which are confirmed as Public Domain in the U.S. +unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not necessarily +keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper edition. + +Each eBook is in a subdirectory of the same number as the eBook's +eBook number, often in several formats including plain vanilla ASCII, +compressed (zipped), HTML and others. + +Corrected EDITIONS of our eBooks replace the old file and take over +the old filename and etext number. The replaced older file is renamed. +VERSIONS based on separate sources are treated as new eBooks receiving +new filenames and etext numbers. + +Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search facility: + +<a href="https://www.gutenberg.org">https://www.gutenberg.org</a> + +This Web site includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm, +including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary +Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to +subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks. + +EBooks posted prior to November 2003, with eBook numbers BELOW #10000, +are filed in directories based on their release date. If you want to +download any of these eBooks directly, rather than using the regular +search system you may utilize the following addresses and just +download by the etext year. + +<a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/dirs/etext06/">https://www.gutenberg.org/dirs/etext06/</a> + + (Or /etext 05, 04, 03, 02, 01, 00, 99, + 98, 97, 96, 95, 94, 93, 92, 92, 91 or 90) + +EBooks posted since November 2003, with etext numbers OVER #10000, are +filed in a different way. The year of a release date is no longer part +of the directory path. The path is based on the etext number (which is +identical to the filename). The path to the file is made up of single +digits corresponding to all but the last digit in the filename. For +example an eBook of filename 10234 would be found at: + +https://www.gutenberg.org/dirs/1/0/2/3/10234 + +or filename 24689 would be found at: +https://www.gutenberg.org/dirs/2/4/6/8/24689 + +An alternative method of locating eBooks: +<a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/dirs/GUTINDEX.ALL">https://www.gutenberg.org/dirs/GUTINDEX.ALL</a> + +*** END: FULL LICENSE *** +</pre> +</body> +</html> |