diff options
| author | Roger Frank <rfrank@pglaf.org> | 2025-10-15 04:44:09 -0700 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Roger Frank <rfrank@pglaf.org> | 2025-10-15 04:44:09 -0700 |
| commit | e9de46dcdcb91ce219e9dbe1dcacb02f31bda8b8 (patch) | |
| tree | fa19ab29b9404e71a1879182776d175fe03fd533 /14299-h | |
Diffstat (limited to '14299-h')
| -rw-r--r-- | 14299-h/14299-h.htm | 5407 |
1 files changed, 5407 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/14299-h/14299-h.htm b/14299-h/14299-h.htm new file mode 100644 index 0000000..afa4168 --- /dev/null +++ b/14299-h/14299-h.htm @@ -0,0 +1,5407 @@ +<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" + "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd"> +<html> + <head> + <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content= + "text/html; charset=UTF-8" /> + <title> + The Project Gutenberg eBook of Native Races and the War, by Josephine E. Butler. + </title> + <style type="text/css"> +/*<![CDATA[ XML blockout */ +<!-- + P { margin-top: .75em; + text-align: justify; + margin-bottom: .75em; + } + H1,H2,H3,H4,H5,H6 { + text-align: center; /* all headings centered */ + } + HR { width: 33%; + margin-top: 1em; + margin-bottom: 1em; + } + BODY{margin-left: 10%; + margin-right: 10%; + } + .linenum {position: absolute; top: auto; left: 4%;} /* poetry number */ + .note {margin-left: 2em; margin-right: 2em; margin-bottom: 1em;} /* footnote */ + .blkquot {margin-left: 4em; margin-right: 4em;} /* block indent */ + .pagenum {position: absolute; left: 92%; font-size: smaller; text-align: right;} /* page numbers */ + .sidenote {width: 20%; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-top: 1em; padding-left: 1em; font-size: smaller; float: right; clear: right;} + + .center {text-align: center;} + .right {text-align: right;} + .poem {margin-left:10%; margin-right:10%; text-align: left;} + .poem br {display: none;} + .poem .stanza {margin: 1em 0em 1em 0em;} + .poem div {display: block; margin: 0; padding-left: 3em; text-indent: -3em;} + .poem div.i2 {display: block; margin-left: 2em;} + .poem div.i4 {display: block; margin-left: 4em;} + // --> + /* XML end ]]>*/ + </style> + </head> +<body> +<div>*** START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK 14299 ***</div> + +<h1>NATIVE RACES</h1> +<h3>AND</h3> +<h1>THE WAR,</h1> + +<h3>BY</h3> + +<h2>JOSEPHINE E. BUTLER.</h2> + +<h3>LONDON:</h3> +<h3>GAY & BIRD.</h3> + +<h3>NEWCASTLE-ON-TYNE:</h3> +<h3>MAWSON, SWAN, & MORGAN.</h3> + +<h3>1900.</h3> + +<hr style="width: 65%;" /> +<h3>DEDICATED TO MY CHILDREN AND GRANDCHILDREN.</h3> + +<hr style="width: 65%;" /> +<h2>CONTENTS</h2> + +<table summary="table of contents"> + <tr> + <td> + <a href="#I">CHAPTER I</a> + </td> + + </tr> + <tr> + <td> + <a href="#II">CHAPTER II</a> + </td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td> + <a href="#III">CHAPTER III</a> + </td> + + </tr> + <tr> + <td> + <a href="#IV">CHAPTER IV</a> + </td> + + </tr> + <tr> + <td> + <a href="#V">CHAPTER V</a> + </td> + + </tr> + <tr> + <td> + <a href="#VI">CHAPTER VI</a> + </td> + + </tr> + <tr> + <td> + <a href="#VII">CHAPTER VII</a> + </td> + + </tr> + <tr> + <td> + <a href="#VIII">CHAPTER VIII</a> + </td> + </tr> + +</table> + + +<hr style="width: 65%;" /> +<h2><a name="I"></a>I.</h2> + +<blockquote><p>APOLOGY FOR "YET ANOTHER BOOK" ON THE SOUTH AFRICAN +QUESTION. FUTURE PEACE MUST BE BASED ON JUSTICE,—TO +COLOURED AS WELL AS WHITE MEN. DIFFERENCE +BETWEEN LEGALIZED SLAVERY AND THE SUBJECTION OF +NATIVES BY INDIVIDUALS. THE TRANSVAAL IN 1877: ITS +BANKRUPTCY: ITS ANNEXATION BY GREAT BRITAIN: ITS +LIBERATION FROM GREAT BRITAIN IN 1881. CONVENTION +OF 1881 SIGNED AT PRETORIA. BRITISH COMMISSIONERS' +AUDIENCE WITH 300 NATIVE CHIEFS. SPEECHES AND +SORROWFUL PROTESTS OF THE CHIEFS. ROYAL COMMISSION +APPOINTED TO TAKE EVIDENCE. EVIDENCE OF NATIVES AND +OTHERS CONCERNING SLAVERY IN THE TRANSVAAL. APPEAL +OF THE CHRISTIAN KING KHAMA. LETTER OF M'PLAANK, +NEPHEW OF CETEWAYO. PREVALENCE OF CONTEMPT FOR +THE NATIVE RACES. SYMPATHY OF A NATIVE CHIEF WITH +THE SUFFERINGS OF CHRIST.</p></blockquote> + +<p>In the midst of the manifold utterances and discussions on +the burning question of to-day,—the War in South Africa,—there +is one side of the subject which, it seems to me, has +not as yet been considered with the seriousness which it deserves,—and +that is the question of Slavery, and of the treatment of +the native races of South Africa. Though this question has +not yet in England or on the Continent been cited as one of the +direct causes of the war, I am convinced,—as are many others,—that +it lies very near to the heart of the present trouble.</p> + +<p>The object of this paper is simply to bring witnesses together +who will testify to the past and present condition of the native +races under British, Dutch, and Transvaal rule. These witnesses +shall not be all of one nation; they shall come from different +countries, and among them there shall be representatives of the +native peoples themselves. I shall add little of my own to the +testimony of these witnesses. But I will say, in advance, that +what I desire to make plain for some sincere persons who are +perplexed, is this,—that where a Government has established by +Law the principle of the complete and final abolition of Slavery, +and made its practice illegal for all time,—as our British +Government has done,—there is hope for the native races;—there +is always hope that, by an appeal to the law and to British +authority, any and every wrong done to the natives, which +approaches to or threatens the reintroduction of slavery, shall be +redressed. The Abolition of Slavery, enacted by our Government +in 1834, was the proclamation of a great principle, strong +and clear, a straight line by which every enactment dealing with +the question, and every act of individuals, or groups of individuals, +bearing on the liberty of the natives can be measured, and any +deviation from that straight line of principle can be exactly +estimated and judged.</p> + +<p>When we speak of injustice done to the natives by the +South African Republics, we are apt to be met with the reproach +that the English have also been guilty of cruelty to native races. +This is unhappily true, and shall not be disguised in the following +pages;—but mark this,—that it is true of certain individuals +bearing the English name, true of groups of individuals, of +certain adventurers and speculators. But this fact does not +touch the far more important and enduring fact that <i>wherever +British rule is established, slavery is abolished, and illegal</i>.</p> + +<p>This fact is the ground of the hope for the future of the +Missionaries of our own country, and of other European countries, +as well as of the poor natives themselves, so far as they have come +to understand the matter; and in several instances they have +shown that they do understand it, and appreciate it keenly.</p> + +<p>Those English persons, or groups of persons, who have +denied to the native labourers their hire (which is the essence of +slavery), have acted on their own responsibility, and <i>illegally</i>. +This should be made to be clearly understood in future +conditions of peace, and rendered impossible henceforward.</p> + +<p>That future peace which we all desire, on the cessation of +the present grievous war, must be a peace founded on justice, for +there is no other peace worthy of the name; and it must be not +only justice as between white men, but as between white men +and men of every shade of complexion.</p> + +<p>A speaker at a public meeting lately expressed a sentiment +which is more or less carelessly repeated by many. I quote it, +as helping me to define the principle to which I have referred, +which marks the difference between an offence or crime committed +by an individual <i>against</i> the law, and an offence or crime +sanctioned, permitted, or enacted by a State or Government +itself, or by public authority in any way.</p> + +<p>This speaker, after confessing, apparently with reluctance, +that "the South African Republic had not been stainless in its +relations towards the blacks," added, "but for these deeds—every +one of them—we could find a parallel among our own +people." I think a careful study of the history of the South +African races would convince this speaker that he has exaggerated +the case as against "our own people" in the matter of deliberate +cruelty and violence towards the natives. However that may +be, it does not alter the fact of the wide difference between the +evil deeds of men acting on their own responsibility and the +evil deeds of Governments, and of Communities in which the +Governmental Authorities do not forbid, but sanction, such +actions.</p> + +<p>As an old Abolitionist, who has been engaged for thirty years +in a war against slavery in another form, may I be allowed to +cite a parallel? That Anti-slavery War was undertaken against +a Law introduced into England, which endorsed, permitted, and +in fact, legalized, a moral and social slavery already existing—a +slavery to the vice of prostitution. The pioneers of the opposition +to this law saw the tremendous import, and the necessary +consequences of such a law. They had previously laboured to +lessen the social evil by moral and spiritual means, but now they +turned their whole attention to obtaining the abolition of the +disastrous enactment which took that evil under its protection. +They felt that the action of Government in passing that law +brought the whole nation (which is responsible for its Government) +under a sentence of guilt—a sentence of moral death. It +lifted off from the shoulders of individuals, in a measure, the +moral responsibility which God had laid upon them, and took +that responsibility on its own shoulders, as representing the +whole nation; it foreshadowed a national blight. My readers +know that we destroyed that legislation after a struggle of +eighteen years. In the course of that long struggle, we were +constantly met by an assertion similar in spirit to that made by +the speaker to whom I have referred; and to this day we are +met by it in certain European countries. They say to us, "But +for every scandal proceeding from this social vice, which you +cite as committed under the system of Governmental Regulation +and sanction, we can find a parallel in the streets of London, +where no Governmental sanction exists." We are constantly +taunted with this, and possibly we may have to admit its truth in +a measure. But our accusers do not see the immense difference +between Governmental and individual responsibility in this vital +matter, neither do they see how additionally hard, how hopeless, +becomes the position of the slave who, under the Government +sanction, has no appeal to the law of the land; an appeal to the +Government which is itself an upholder of slavery, is impossible. +The speaker above cited concluded by saying: "The best precaution +against the abuse of power on the part of whites living amidst +a coloured population is to make the punishment of misdeeds +come home to the persons who are guilty of those misdeeds; and +if he could but get his countrymen to act up to that view he +believed we should really have a better prospect for the future of +South Africa than we had had in the past."</p> + +<p>With this sentiment I am entirely in accord. It is our hope +that the present national awakening on the whole subject of our +position and responsibilities in South Africa will—in case of the +re-establishment of peace under the principles of British rule—result +in a change in the condition of the native races, both in +the Transvaal, and at the hands of our countrymen and others +who may be acting in their own interests, or in the interests of +Commercial Societies.</p> + +<p>I do not intend to sketch anything approaching to a history +of South African affairs during the last seventy or eighty years; +that has been ably done by others, writing from both the British +and the Boer side. I shall only attempt to trace the condition +of certain native tribes in connection with some of the most +salient events in South Africa of the century which is past.</p> + +<p>In 1877, as my readers know, the Transvaal was annexed +by Sir Theophilus Shepstone. There are very various opinions +as to the justice of that annexation. I will only here remark that +it was at the earnest solicitation of the Transvaal leaders of +that date that an interference on the part of the British +Commissioner was undertaken. The Republic was in a state +of apparently hopeless anarchy, owing to constant conflicts with +warlike native tribes around and in the heart of the country. +The exchequer was exhausted. By the confession of the President +(Burgers) the country was on the verge of bankruptcy.<a name="FNanchor_1_1" href="#Footnote_1_1">[1]</a> +The acceptance of the annexation was not unanimous, but it +was accepted formally in a somewhat sullen and desponding +spirit, as a means of averting further impending calamity and +restoring a measure of order and peace. Whether this justified +or not the act of annexation I do not pretend to judge. The +results, however, for the Republic were for the time, financial +relief and prosperity, and better treatment of the natives. The +financial condition of the country, as I have said, at the time of +the annexation, was one of utter bankruptcy. "After three +years of British rule, however, the total revenue receipts for the +first quarter of 1879 and 1880 amounted to £22,773 and £47,982 +respectively. That is to say, that, during the last year of British +rule, the revenue of the country more than doubled itself, and +amounted to about £160,000 a year, taking the quarterly returns +at the low average of £40,000."<a name="FNanchor_2_2" href="#Footnote_2_2">[2]</a> Trade, also, which in April, +1877, was completely paralysed, had increased enormously. In +the middle of 1879, the committee of the Transvaal Chamber of +Commerce pointed out that the trade of the country had in two +years risen to the sum of two millions sterling per annum. +They also pointed out that more than half the land-tax was +paid by Englishmen and other Europeans.</p> + +<p>In 1881, the Transvaal (under Mr. Gladstone's administration) +was liberated from British control. It was given back to +its own leaders, under certain conditions, agreed to and solemnly +signed by the President. These are the much-discussed conditions +of the Convention of 1881, one of these conditions being that +Slavery should be abolished. This condition was indeed, insisted +on in every agreement or convention made between the British +Government and the Boers; the first being that of 1852, called +the Sand River Convention; the second, a convention entered +into two years later called the Bloemfontein Convention (which +created the Orange Free State); a third agreement as to the +cessation of Slavery was entered into at the period of the Annexation, +1877; a fourth was the Convention of 1881; a fifth the +Convention of 1884. I do not here speak of the other terms of +these Conventions, I only remark that in each a just treatment of +the native races was demanded and agreed to.</p> + +<p>The retrocession of the Transvaal in 1881 has been much +lauded as an act of magnanimity and justice. There is no doubt +that the motive which prompted it was a noble and generous +one; yet neither is there any doubt, that in certain respects, the +results of that act were unhappy, and were no doubt unanticipated. +It was on the natives, whose interests appeared to have had no place +in the generous impulses of Mr. Gladstone, that the action +of the British Government fell most heavily, most mournfully. +In this matter, it must be confessed that the English Government +broke faith with the unhappy natives, to whom it had promised +protection, and who so much needed it. In this, as in many +other matters, our country, under successive Governments, has +greatly erred; at times neglecting responsibilities to her loyal +Colonial subjects, and at other times interfering unwisely.</p> + +<p>In one matter, England has, however, been consistent, +namely, in the repeated proclamations that Slavery should never +be permitted under her rule and authority.</p> + +<p>The formal document of agreement between Her Majesty's +Government and the Boer leaders, known as the Convention of +1881, was signed by both parties at Pretoria on the afternoon of +the 3rd August, in the same room in which, nearly four years +before, the Annexation Proclamation was signed by Sir T. +Shepstone.</p> + +<p>This formality was followed by a more unpleasant duty for +the Commissioners appointed to settle this business, namely, the +necessity of conveying their message to the natives, and informing +them that they had been handed back by Great Britain, "poor +Canaanites," to the tender mercies of their masters, the "Chosen +people," in spite of the despairing appeals which many of them +had made to her.</p> + +<p>Some three hundred of the principal native chiefs were +called together in the Square at Pretoria, and there the English +Commissioner read to them the proclamation of Queen Victoria. +Sir Hercules Robinson, the Chief Commissioner, having "introduced +the native chiefs to Messrs. Kruger, Pretorius, and +Joubert," having given them good advice as to indulging in +manual labour when asked to do so by the Boers, and having +reminded them that it would be necessary to retain the law +relating to Passes, which is, in the hands of a people like the +Boers, almost as unjust a regulation as a dominant race can +invent for the oppression of a subject people, concluded by +assuring them that their "interests would never be forgotten or +neglected by Her Majesty's Government." Having read this +document, the Commission hastily withdrew, and after their +withdrawal the Chiefs were "allowed" to state their opinions to +the Secretary for Native Affairs.</p> + +<p>In availing themselves of this permission, it is noticeable +that no allusion was made by the Chiefs to the advantages they +were to reap under the Convention. All their attention was given +to the great fact that the country had been ceded to the Boers, +and that they were no longer the Queen's subjects. I beg +attention to the following appeals from the hearts of these +oppressed people. They got very excited, and asked whether +it was thought that they had no feelings or hearts, that they were +thus treated as a stick or piece of tobacco, which could be passed +from hand to hand without question.</p> + +<p>Umgombarie, a Zoutpansberg Chief, said: "I am Umgombarie. +I have fought with the Boers, and have many wounds, +and they know that what I say is true. I will never consent to +place myself under their rule. I belong to the English Government. +I am not a man who eats with both sides of his jaw at +once; I only use one side. I am English. I have said."</p> + +<p>Silamba said: "I belong to the English. I will never +return under the Boers. You see me, a man of my rank and +position; is it right that such as I should be seized and laid +on the ground and flogged, as has been done to me and other +Chiefs?"</p> + +<p>Sinkanhla said: "We hear and yet do not hear, we cannot +understand. We are troubling you, Chief, by talking in this +way; we hear the Chiefs say that the Queen took the country +because the people of the country wished it, and again, +that the majority of the owners of the country did +not wish her rule, and that therefore the country was +given back. We should like to have the man pointed +out from among us black people who objects to the rule +of the Queen. We are the real owners of the country; we were +here when the Boers came, and without asking leave, settled +down and treated us in every way badly. The English Government +then came and took the country; we have now had four +years of rest, and peaceful and just rule. We have been called +here to-day, and are told that the country, our country, has been +given to the Boers by the Queen. This is a thing which surprises, +us. Did the country, then, belong to the Boers? Did it not +belong to our fathers and forefathers before us, long before the +Boers came here? We have heard that the Boers' country is at +the Cape. If the Queen wishes to give them their land, why +does she not give them back the Cape?"</p> + +<p>Umyethile said: "We have no heart for talking. I have +returned to the country from Sechelis, where I had to fly from +Boer oppression. Our hearts are black and heavy with grief +to-day at the news told us. We are in agony; our intestines are +twisting and writhing inside of us, just as you see a snake do +when it is struck on the head. We do not know what has +become of us, but we feel dead. It may be that the Lord may +change the nature of the Boers, and that we will not be treated +like dogs and beasts of burden as formerly; but we have no +hope of such a change, and we leave you with heavy hearts and +great apprehension as to the future."<a name="FNanchor_3_3" href="#Footnote_3_3">[3]</a> In his Report, Mr. +Shepstone (Secretary for Native Affairs) says, "One chief, Jan +Sibilo, who had been personally threatened with death by the +Boers after the English should leave, could not restrain his +feelings, but cried like a child."</p> + +<p>In 1881, the year of the retrocession of the Transvaal, a +Royal Commission was appointed from England to enquire into +the internal state of affairs in the South African Republic. On +the 9th May of that year, an affidavit was sworn to before that +Commission by the Rev. John Thorne, of St. John the Evangelist, +Lydenburg, Transvaal. He stated: "I was appointed to the +charge of a congregation in Potchefstroom when the Republic +was under the Presidency of Mr. Pretorius. I noticed one +morning, as I walked through the streets, a number of young +natives whom I knew to be strangers. I enquired where they +came from. I was told that they had just been brought from +Zoutpansberg. This was the locality from which slaves were +chiefly brought at that time, and were traded for under the name +of 'Black Ivory.' One of these slaves belonged to Mr. Munich, +the State Attorney." In the fourth paragraph of the same +affidavit, Mr. Thorne says that "the Rev. Dr. Nachtigal, of the +Berlin Missionary Society, was the interpreter for Shatane's +people, in the private office of Mr. Roth, and, at the close of the +interview, told me what had occurred. On my expressing +surprise, he went on to relate that he had information on native +matters which would surprise me more. He then produced the +copy of a register, kept in the Landdrost's office, of men, women, +and children, to the number of four hundred and eighty (480), who +had been disposed of by one Boer to another for a consideration. +In one case an ox was given in exchange, in another goats, in a +third a blanket, and so forth. Many of these natives he (Mr. +Nachtigal) knew personally. The copy was certified as true and +correct by an official of the Republic."<a name="FNanchor_4_4" href="#Footnote_4_4">[4]</a></p> + +<p>On the 16th May, 1881, a native, named Frederick Molepo, +was examined by the Royal Commission. The following are +extracts from his examination:—</p> + +<p>"(<i>Sir Evelyn Wood</i>.) Are you a Christian?—Yes.</p> + +<p>"(<i>Sir H. de Villiers</i>.) How long were you a slave?—Half-a-year.</p> + +<p>"How do you know that you were a slave? Might you not +have been an apprentice?—No, I was not apprenticed.</p> + +<p>"How do you know?—They got me from my parents, and +ill-treated me.</p> + +<p>"(<i>Sir Evelyn Wood</i>.) How many times did you get the stick?—Every +day.</p> + +<p>"(<i>Sir H. de Villiers</i>.) What did the Boers do with you when +they caught you?—They sold me.</p> + +<p>"How much did they sell you for?—One cow and a big pot."</p> + +<p>On the 28th May, 1881, amongst the other documents-handed +in for the consideration of the Royal Commission, is the +statement of a Headman, whose name also it was considered +advisable to omit in the Blue book, lest the Boers should +take vengeance on him. He says, "I say, that if the English +Government dies I shall die too; I would rather die than be +under the Boer Government. I am the man who helped to make +bricks for the church you see now standing in the square here +(Pretoria), as a slave without payment. As a representative of +my people, I am still obedient to the English Government, and +willing to obey all commands from them, even to die for their +cause in this country, rather than submit to the Boers.</p> + +<p>"I was under Shambok, my chief, who fought the Boers-formerly, +but he left us, and we were <i>put up to auction</i> and sold +among the Boers. I want to state this myself to the Royal +Commission. I was bought by Fritz Botha and sold by Frederick +Botha, who was then veldt cornet (justice of the peace) of the +Boers."</p> + +<p>Many more of such extracts might be quoted, but it is not +my motive to multiply horrors. These are given exactly as they +stand in the original, which may all be found in Blue Books-presented +to Parliament.</p> + +<p>It has frequently been denied on behalf of the Transvaal, +and is denied at this day, in the face of innumerable witnesses to +the contrary, that slavery exists in the Transvaal. Now, this +may be considered to be verbally true. Slavery, they say, did +not exist; but apprenticeship did, and does exist. It is only +another name. It is not denied that some Boers have been kind +to their slaves, as humane slave-owners frequently were in the +Southern States of America. But kindness, even the most indulgent, +to slaves, has never been held by abolitionists to excuse +the existence of slavery.</p> + +<p>Mr. Rider Haggard, who spent a great part of his life in the +Transvaal and other parts of South Africa, wrote in 1899: "The +assertion that Slavery did not exist in the Transvaal is made to +hoodwink the British public. I have known men who have +owned slaves, and who have seen whole waggon-loads of Black +Ivory, as they were called, sold for about £15 a piece. I have at +this moment a tenant, Carolus by name, on some land I own in +Natal, now a well-to-do man, who was for twenty years a Boer +slave. He told me that during those years he worked from +morning till night, and the only reward he received was two +calves. He finally escaped to Natal."</p> + +<p>Going back some years, evidence may be found, equally well +attested with that already quoted. On the 22nd August, 1876, +Khama, the Christian King of the Bamangwato (Bechuanaland), +one of the most worthy Chiefs which any country has had the +good fortune to be ruled by, wrote to Sir Henry de Villiers the +following message, to be sent to Queen Victoria:—"I write to +you, Sir Henry, in order that your Queen may preserve for me +my country, it being in her hands. The Boers are coming into +it, and I do not like them. Their actions are cruel among us +black people. We are like money; they sell us and our children. +I ask Her Majesty to pity me, and to hear that which I write +quickly. I wish to hear upon what conditions Her Majesty will +receive me, and my country and my people, under her protection. +I am weary with fighting. I do not like war, and I ask Her +Majesty to give me peace. I am very much distressed that my +people are being destroyed by war, and I wish them to obtain +peace. I ask Her Majesty to defend me, as she defends all her +people. There are three things which distress me very much—war, +selling people, and drink. All these things I find in the +Boers, and it is these things which destroy people, to make an +end of them in the country. The custom of the Boers has always +been to cause people to be sold, and to-day they are still selling +people. Last year I saw them pass with two waggons full of +people whom they had bought at the river at Tanane (Lake +Ngate).—Khama."</p> + +<p>The visit of King Khama to England, a few years ago, his +interview with the Queen, and his pathetic appeals on behalf of +his people against the intrusion of any aggressors (drink being +one of them), are fresh in our memory.</p> + +<p>Coming down to a recent date, I reproduce here a letter +from a Zulu Chief, which appeared in the London Press in +November, 1899. This letter is written to a gentleman, who +accompanied it by the following remarks:—"After I had read +this very remarkable letter, I found myself half unconsciously +wondering what place in the scheme of South African life will be +found for Zulus such as this nephew of the last of the Zulu +Kings. One thing I am fully certain of, that there are few +natives in the Cape Colony (where they are full-fledged voters) +capable of inditing so sensible an epistle. This communication +throws a most welcome light upon the attitude of his people with +respect to the momentous events that are in progress, and also it +reveals to what a high standard of intellectual culture a pure +Zulu may attain."</p> + +<p class='right'>"Duff's Road, Durban, </p> +<p class='right'>November 3rd, 1899.</p> + +<p>Sir,—I keenly appreciate your generous tribute to the +loyalty of the Zulu nation during the fierce crisis of English rule +in South Africa. It is the first real test of the loyalty of the +Zulus, and as a Zulu who was once a Chief, I rejoice to see that +the loyalty and gratitude of my people is appreciated by the +white people of Natal.</p> + +<p>It is, as you say, respected Sir, a tribute, and a magnificent +one, to England's just policy to the Zulus. I dare to assert it is +even a finer tribute to the natives' appreciation, not only of +benefits already conferred, but of the spirit that actuated +England in her dealings with him. I may disagree as to the +lessons taught by Maxim guns, hollow squares, and the 'thin red +line.' I think no one can have read Colonial history, chronicling +as it does, the rise again and again of the native against Imperial +forces, without feeling that he is influenced far less by England's +prowess in war than by her justice in peace. My Zulu fellow-countrymen +understand as clearly as anyone the weakness and +the strength of the present time. If the Zulu wished to remember +Kambula and Ulundi, this would be his supreme opportunity to +rise and hurl himself across the Natal frontier. But I, having +just returned from my native country, have been able to report +to the Government at Pietermaritzburg that there is not the +slightest symptom of disloyalty, not the idea of lifting a finger +against the white subjects of the great and good Queen.</p> + +<p>There is among the Chiefs and Indunas of my people an +almost universal hope that the Imperial arms will be victorious, +and that a Government which, by its inhumanity and relentless +injustice, and apparent inability to see that the native has any +rights a white man should respect, has forfeited its place among +the civilised Governments of the earth, and should therefore be +deprived of powers so scandalously abused—formerly by slavery, +and in later years by disallowing the native to buy land, and +utterly neglecting his intellectual and spiritual needs. There are +wrongs to be redressed, and we Zulus believe that England will +be more willing to redress them than any other Power. There +is still much to be done in the way of educating and civilizing the +mass of the Zulu nation. We Chiefs of that nation have +observed that wherever England has gone there the Missionary +and teacher follow, and that there exists sympathy between the +authority of Her Majesty and the forces that labour for civilization +and Christianity. We Zulus have not yet forgotten what +we owe to the late Bishop Colenso's lifelong advocacy, or to +Lady Florence Dixie's kindly interest. These are things that +are more than fear of England's might, that keep our people +quiet outside and loyal inside. This is not a passive loyalty with +us. Speaking for almost all my fellow-countrymen in Zululand, +I believe if a great emergency arises in the course of this history-making +war, in which England might find it necessary to put +their loyalty to the test, they would respond with readiness and +enthusiasm equal to that when they fought under King Cetewayo +against Lord Chelmsford's army. Again assuring you that the +Zulu people are turning deaf ears to Boer promises, as well as +threats, I remain, with the most earnest hope for the ultimate +triumph of General Buller—who fought my King for half a year. +Your humble and most obedient servant,</p> + +<p class='right'>M'PLAANK, </p> +<p class='right'>Son of Maguendé, brother of Cetewayo."</p> + +<p>There is unhappily a tendency among persons living for any +length of time among heathen people, to think and speak with a +certain contempt for those people, at whose moral elevation they +may even be sincerely aiming. They see all that is bad in these +"inferior races," and little that is good. This was not so in the +case of the greatest and most successful Missionaries. They +never lost faith in human nature, even at its lowest estate, and +hence they were able to raise the standard of the least promising +of the outcast races of the world. This faith in the possibility of +the elevation of these races has been firmly held, however, by +some who know them best, and have lived among them the +longest.</p> + +<p>Mr Rider Haggard writes thus on this subject:—"So far as +my own experience of natives has gone, I have found that in all +the essential qualities of mind and body they very much resemble +white men. Of them might be aptly quoted the speech Shakespeare +puts into Shylock's mouth: 'Hath not a Jew eyes? hath +not a Jew hands, organs, dimensions, senses, affections, passions?' +In the same way, I ask, has a native no feelings or affections? +does he not suffer when his parents are shot, or his children +stolen, or when he is driven a wanderer from his home? Does +he not know fear, feel pain, affection, hate, and gratitude? +Most certainly he does; and this being so, I cannot believe that +the Almighty, who made both white and black, gave to the one +race the right or mission of exterminating or of robbing or maltreating +the other, and calling the process the advance of +civilization. It seems to me, that on only one condition, if at all, +have we the right to take the black men's land; and that is, that +we provide them with an equal and a just Government, and +allow no maltreatment of them, either as individuals or tribes, but, +on the contrary, do our best to elevate them, and wean them from +savage customs. Otherwise, the practice is surely undefensible.</p> + +<p>"I am aware, however, that with the exception of a small +class, these are sentiments which are not shared by the great +majority of the public, either at home or abroad."</p> + +<p>A French gentleman, who has been for many years connected +with the <i>Missions Evangéliques</i> of France, related recently in my +presence some incidents of the early experience of French +Missionaries in South Africa. One of these had laboured for +years without encouragement. The hearts of the native people +around him remained unmoved. One day, however, he spoke +among them especially of Calvary, of the sufferings of Christ on +the Cross. A Chief who was present left the building in which +the teacher was speaking. At the close, this Chief was found +sitting on the ground outside, his back to the door, his head bent +forward and buried in his arms. He was weeping. When +spoken to, he raised his arm with a movement of deprecation, +and, in a voice full of pity and indignation, said—"to think +that there was no one even to give Him a drink of water!" That +poor savage had known what thirst is. This one awakened +chord of human sympathy with the human Christ was communicative. +Other hearts were touched, and from that time the +Missionary began to reap a rich harvest from his labours. In +the midst of the elaborate services of our fashionable London +churches is there often to be found so genuine a feeling as that +which shook the soul of this Chief, and broke down the barrier +of coldness and hardness in his fellow-countrymen which had +before prevented the acceptance of the message of Salvation +and of the practical obligations of Christianity among them? +Men who are capable of rising to the knowledge and love of +divine truth cannot be supposed to be impervious to the influence +of <i>civilization</i> properly understood.</p> + +<p>FOOTNOTES:</p> + +<p><a name="Footnote_1_1" href="#FNanchor_1_1">[1]</a> The financial resources of the country at that time +amounted to 12s. 6d.</p> + +<p><a name="Footnote_2_2" href="#FNanchor_2_2">[2]</a> Quoted from Parliamentary Blue Book.</p> + +<p><a name="Footnote_3_3" href="#FNanchor_3_3">[3]</a> Report made on the spot by Mr. Shepstone (not +Sir Theophilus Shepstone), Secretary for Native Affairs.</p> + +<p><a name="Footnote_4_4" href="#FNanchor_4_4">[4]</a> The name of that official was held back from publication at +the time, as if his act were known by the Boers, it was believed it +might have cost the man his life.</p> + + + +<hr style="width: 65%;" /> +<h2><a name="II"></a>II.</h2> + +<blockquote><p>THE CAUSES OF THE WAR DATE FAR BACK. THE FAULTS OF +ENGLAND TO BE SOUGHT IN THE PAST. A REVISED VERDICT +NEEDED. DOWNING STREET GOVERNMENT AND SUCCESSIVE +COLONIAL GOVERNORS. M. MABILLE AND M. DIETERLEN, +FRENCH MISSIONARIES. EARLY HISTORY OF CAPE COLONY. +ABOLITION OF SLAVERY BY GREAT BRITAIN. COMPENSATION +TO SLAVE OWNERS. FIRST TREK OF THE BURGHERS.</p></blockquote> + +<p>There is nothing so fallacious or misleading in history as +the popular tendency to trace the causes of a great war to +one source alone, or to fix upon the most recent events +leading up to it, as the principal or even the sole cause of the +outbreak of war. The occasion of an event may not be, and +often is not, the cause of it. The occasion of this war was not +its cause. In the present case it is extraordinary to note how +almost the whole of Europe appears to be carried away with the +idea that the causes of this terrible South African war are, as it +were, only of yesterday's date. The seeds of which we are +reaping so woeful a harvest were not sown yesterday, nor a few +years ago only. We are reaping a harvest which has been +ripening for a century past.</p> + +<p>At the time of the Indian Mutiny, it was given out and +believed by the world in general that the cause of that hideous +revolt was a supposed attempt on the part of England to impose +upon the native army of India certain rules which, from their +point of view, outraged their religion in some of its most sacred +aspects; (I refer to the legend of the greased cartridges). After +the mutiny was over, Sir Herbert Edwardes, a true Seer, whose +insight enabled him to look far below the surface, and to go back +many years into the history of our dealings with India in order to +take in review all the causes of the rebellion, addressed an +exhaustive report to the British Government at home, dealing with +those causes which had been accumulating for half-a-century or +more. This was a weighty document,—one which it would be +worth while to re-peruse at the present day; it had its influence in +leading the Home Government to acknowledge some grave errors +which had led up to this catastrophe, and to make an honest and +persevering attempt to remedy past evils. That this attempt has +not been in vain, in spite of all that India has had to suffer, has +been acknowledged gratefully by the Native delegates to the +great Annual Congress in India of the past year.</p> + +<p>In the case of the Indian Mutiny, the incident of the +supposed insult to their religious feelings was only the match +which set light to a train which had been long laid. In the same +way the honest historian will find, in the present case, that the +events,—the "tragedy of errors," as they have been called,—of +recent date, are but the torch that has set fire to a long prepared +mass of combustible material which had been gradually accumulating +in the course of a century.</p> + +<p>In order to arrive at a true estimate of the errors and mismanagement +which lie at the root of the causes of the present +war, it is necessary to look back. Those errors and wrongs must +be patiently searched out and studied, without partisanship, with +an open mind and serious purpose. Many of our busy politicians +and others have not the time, some perhaps have not the +inclination for any such study. Hence, hasty, shallow, and violent +judgments.</p> + +<p>Never has there occurred in history a great struggle such as +the present which has not had a deep moral teaching.</p> + +<p>England is now suffering for her past errors, extending over +many years. The blood of her sons is being poured out like +water on the soil of South Africa. Wounded hearts and desolated +families at home are counted by tens of thousands.</p> + +<p>But it needs to be courageously stated by those who have +looked a little below the surface that her faults have not been +those which are attributed to her by a large proportion of +European countries, and by a portion of her own people. These +appear to attribute this war to a sudden impulse on her part +of Imperial ambition and greed, and to see in the attitude which +they attribute to her alone, the provocative element which was +chiefly supplied from the other side. There will have to be a +Revision of this Verdict, and there will certainly be one; it is +on the way, though its approach may be slow. It will be +rejected by some to the last.</p> + +<p>The great error of England appears to have been a strange +neglect, from time to time, of the true interests of her South +African subjects, English, Dutch, and Natives. There have +been in her management of this great Colony alternations of +apathy and inaction, with interference which was sometimes +unwise and hasty. Some of her acts have been the result of +ignorance, indifference, or superciliousness on the part of our +rulers.</p> + +<p>The special difficulties, however, in her position towards that +Colony should be taken into account.</p> + +<p>It has always been a question as to how far interference +from Downing Street with the freedom of action of a Self-Governing +Colony was wise or practicable. In other instances, the exercise +of great freedom of colonial self-government has had happy +results, as in Canada and Australia.</p> + +<p>Far from our South African policy having represented, as is +believed by some, the self-assertion of a proud Imperialism, it +has been the very opposite.</p> + +<p>It seems evident that some of the greatest evils in the +British government of South Africa have arisen from the frequent +changes of Governors and Administrators there, <i>concurrently with +changes in the Government at home</i>. There have been Governors +under whose influence and control all sections of the people, +including the natives, have had a measure of peace and good +government. Such a Governor was Sir George Grey, of whose +far-seeing provisions for the welfare of all classes many effects +last to this day.</p> + +<p>The nature of the work undertaken, and to a great extent +done, by Sir George Grey and those of his successors who +followed his example, was concisely described by an able local +historian in 1877:—"The aim of the Colonial Government since +1855," he said, "has been to establish and maintain peace, to +diffuse civilization and Christianity, and to establish society on +the basis of individual property and personal industry. The +agencies employed are the magistrate, the missionary, the school-master, +and the trader." Of the years dating from the commencement +of Sir George Grey's administration, it was thus reported:—"During +this time peace has been uninterruptedly enjoyed +within British frontiers. The natives have been treated in all. +respects with justice and consideration. Large tracts of the +richest land are expressly set apart for them under the name of +'reserves' and 'locations.' The greater part of them live in these +locations, under the superintendence of European magistrates +or missionaries. As a whole, they are now enjoying far +greater comfort and prosperity than they ever did in their normal +state of barbaric independence and perpetually recurring tribal +wars, before coming into contact with Europeans. The advantages +and value of British rule have of late years struck root in +the native mind over an immense portion of South Africa. They +believe that it is a protection from external encroachment, and +that only under the <i>ægis</i> of the Government can they be secure +and enjoy peace and prosperity. Influenced by this feeling, +several tribes beyond the colonial boundaries are now eager to be +brought within the pale of civilized authority, and ere long, it is +hoped, Her Majesty's sovereignty will be extended over fresh +territories, with the full and free consent of the chiefs and tribes +inhabiting them."<a name="FNanchor_5_5" href="#Footnote_5_5">[5]</a></p> + +<p>It maybe of interest to note here that one of these territories +was Basutoland, which lies close to the South Eastern border of +the Orange Free State.</p> + +<p>Between the Basutos and the Orange Free State Boers war +broke out in 1856, to be followed in 1858 by a temporary and +incomplete pacification. The struggle continued, and in 1861, +and again in 1865, when war was resumed, and all Basutoland +was in danger of being conquered by the Boers, Moshesh, their +Chief, appealed to the British Government for protection. It +was not till 1868, after a large part of the country had passed +into Boer hands, that Sir Philip Wodehouse, Sir George Grey's +successor, was allowed to issue a proclamation declaring so much +as remained of Basutoland to be British territory.</p> + +<p>It was Sir George Grey who first saw the importance of +endeavouring to bring all portions of South Africa, including the +Boer Republics and the Native States, into "federal union with +the parent colony" at the Cape. He was commissioned by the +British Government to make enquiries with this object (1858.) +He had obtained the support of the Orange Free State, whose +Volksraad resolved that "a union with the Cape Colony, either +on the plan of federation or otherwise, is desirable," and was +expecting to win over the Transvaal Boers, when the British +Government, alarmed as to the responsibilities it might incur, +vetoed the project. (Such sudden alarms, under the influence of +party conflicts at home, have not been infrequent.)</p> + +<p>For seven years, however, this good Governor was permitted +to promote a work of pacification and union.</p> + +<p>I shall refer again later to the misfortunes, even the +calamities, which have been the result of our projecting our +home system of <i>Government by Party</i> into the distant regions of +South Africa. There are long proved advantages in that +system of party government as existing for our own country, +but it seems to have been at the root of much of the +inconsistency and vacillation of our policy in South Africa. As +soon as a good Governor (appointed by either political party) has. +begun to develop his methods, and to lead the Dutch, and English, +and Natives alike to begin to believe that there is something +homogeneous in the principles of British government, a General +Election takes place in England. A new Parliament and a new +Government come into power, and, frequently in obedience to +some popular representations at home, the actual Colonial +Governor is recalled, and another is sent out.</p> + +<p>Lord Glenelg, for example, had held office as Governor of +the Cape Colony for five years,—up to 1846. His policy had +been, it is said, conciliatory and wise. But immediately on a +change of party in the Government at home, he was recalled, and +Sir Harry Smith superseded him, a recklessly aggressive person.</p> + +<p>It was only by great pains and trouble that the succeeding +Governor, Sir George Cathcart, a wiser man, brought about a +settlement of the confusion and disputes arising from Sir Harry +Smith's aggressive and violent methods.</p> + +<p>And so it has gone on, through all the years.</p> + +<p>Allusion having been made above to the assumption of the +Protectorate of Basutoland by Great Britain, it will not be +without interest to notice here the circumstances and the motives +which led to that act. It will be seen that there was no +aggressiveness nor desire of conquest in this case; but that the +protection asked was but too tardily granted on the pathetic and +reiterated prayer of the natives suffering from the aggressions +of the Transvaal.</p> + +<p>The following is from the Biography of Adolphe Mabille, a +devoted missionary of the <i>Société des Missions Evangéliques</i> +of Paris, who worked with great success in Basutoland. His life is +written by Mr. Dieterlen (a name well known and highly esteemed +in France), and the book has a preface by the famous missionary, +Mr. F. Coillard.<a name="FNanchor_6_6" href="#Footnote_6_6">[6]</a></p> + +<p>"The Boers had long been keeping up an aggressive war +against the Basutos (1864 to 1869), so much so that Mr. Mabille's +missionary work was for a time almost destroyed. The Boers +thought they saw in the missionaries' work the secret of the +steady resistance of the Basutos, and of the moral force which +prevented them laying down their arms. They exacted that Mr. +Mabille should leave the country at once, which theoretically, +they said, belonged to them.</p> + +<p>"This good missionary and his friends were subjected to long +trials during this hostility of the Boers. Moshesh, the chief of +the Basutos, had for a long time past been asking the Governor +of Cape Colony to have him and his people placed under the +direction of Great Britain. The reply from the Cape was very +long delayed. Moshesh, worn out, was about to capitulate at +last to the Boers. Lessuto (the territory of Basutoland) was on +the point of being absorbed by the Transvaal. At the last +moment, however, and not a day too soon, there came a letter +from the Governor of the Cape announcing to Moshesh that +Queen Victoria had consented to take the Basutos under her +protection. It was the long-expected deliverance,—it was salvation! +At this news the missionaries, with Moshesh, burst into +tears, and falling on their knees, gave thanks to God for this +providential and almost unexpected intervention."</p> + +<p>The Boers retained a large and fertile tract of Lessuto, +but the rest of the country, continues M. Dieterlen, "remained +under the Protectorate of a people who, provided peace is +maintained, and their commerce is not interfered with, know +how to work for the right development of the native people +whose lands they annex."</p> + +<p>Mr. Dieterlen introduces into his narrative the following +remarks,—which are interesting as coming, not from an Englishman, +but from a Frenchman,—and one who has had close +personal experience of the matters of which he speaks:—</p> + +<p>"Stayers at home, as we Frenchmen are, forming our +opinions from newspapers whose editors know no more than +ourselves what goes on in foreign countries, we too willingly see +in the British nation an egotistical and rapacious people, thinking +of nothing but the extension of their commerce and the prosperity +of their industry. We are apt to pretend that their philanthropic +enterprises and religious works are a mere hypocrisy. Courage +is absolutely needed in order to affirm, at the risk of exciting the +indignation of our <i>soi-disant</i> patriots, that although England knows +perfectly well how to take care of her commercial interests in her +colonies, she knows equally well how to pre-occupy and occupy +herself with the moral interests of the people whom she places by +agreement or by force under the sceptre of her Queen. Those who +have seen and who know, have the duty of saying to those who +have not seen, and who cannot, or who do not desire to see, and +who do not know, that these two currents flowing from the +British nation,—the one commercial and the other philanthropic,—are +equally active amongst the uncivilized nations of Africa, +and that if one wishes to find colonies in which exist real and +complete liberty of conscience, where the education and moralisation +of the natives are the object of serious concern, drawing +largely upon the budget of the metropolis, it is always and above +all in English possessions that you must look for them.</p> + +<p>"Under the domination of the Boers, Lessuto would have +been devoted to destruction, to ignorance, and to semi-slavery. +Under the English régime reign security and progress. Lessuto +became a territory reserved solely for its native proprietors, the +sale of strong liquors was prohibited, and the schools received +generous subvention. Catholics, Protestants, Anglicans, French +and English Missionaries, could then enjoy the most absolute +liberty in order to spread, each one in his own manner, and in the +measure in which he possessed it, evangelic truth.</p> + +<p>"It is for this reason that the French missionaries feared to +see the Basutos fall under the Boers' yoke, and that they hailed +with joy the intervention of the English Government in their +field of work, hoping and expecting for the missionary work the +happiest fruits. Their hope has not been deceived by the +results."</p> + +<p>The clash of opposing principles, and even the violence of +party feeling continued to send its echoes to the far regions of +South Africa, confusing the minds of the various populations +there, and preventing any real coherence and continuity in our +Government of that great Colony. A good and successful +Administrator has sometimes been withdrawn to be superseded +by another, equally well-intentioned, perhaps, but whose policy +was on wholly different lines, thus undoing the work of his +predecessor. This has introduced not only confusion, but sometimes +an appearance of real injustice into our management of the +colony. In all this chequered history, the interests of the native +races have been too often postponed to those of the ruling races. +This was certainly the case in connexion with Mr. Gladstone's +well-intentioned act in giving back to the Transvaal its independent +government.</p> + +<p>It has been an anxious question for many among us whether +this source of vacillation, with its attendant misfortunes, is to +continue in the future.</p> + +<hr style='width: 45%;' /> + +<p>The early history of the South African Colony has become, +by this time, pretty well known by means of the numberless books +lately written on the subject. I will only briefly recapitulate here +a few of the principal facts, these being, in part, derived from the +annals and reports of the Aborigines Protection Society, which +may be considered impartial, seeing that that Society has had a +keen eye at all times for the faults of British colonists and the +British Government, while constrained, as a truthful recorder, +to publish the offences of other peoples and Governments. +I have also constantly referred to Parliamentary papers, and +the words of accredited historians and travellers.</p> + +<p>The first attempt at a regular settlement by the Dutch at +the Cape was made by Jan Van Riebeck, in 1652, for the convenience +of the trading vessels of the Netherlands East India +Company, passing from Europe to Asia. Almost from the first +these colonists were involved in quarrels with the natives, which +furnished excuse for appropriating their lands and making slaves +of them. The intruders stole the natives' cattle, and the natives' +efforts to recover their property were denounced by Van Riebeck +as "a matter most displeasing to the Almighty, when committed +by such as they." Apologising to his employers in Holland for +his show of kindness to one group of natives, Van Riebeck wrote: +"This we only did to make them less shy, so as to find hereafter +a better opportunity to seize them—1,100 or 1,200 in number, +and about 600 cattle, the best in the whole country. We have +every day the finest opportunities for effecting this without +bloodshed, and could derive good service from the people, <i>in +chains</i>, in killing seals or in labouring in the silver mines which +we trust will be found here."</p> + +<p>The Netherlands Company frequently deprecated such acts +of treachery and cruelty, and counselled moderation. Their +protests however were of no avail. The mischief had been done. +The unhappy natives, with whom lasting friendship might have +been established by fair treatment, had been converted into +enemies; and the ruthless punishment inflicted on them for each +futile effort to recover some of the property stolen from them, +had rendered inevitable the continuance and constant extension +of the strife all through the five generations of Dutch rule, +and furnished cogent precedent for like action afterwards,<a name="FNanchor_7_7" href="#Footnote_7_7">[7]</a> +After 1652, Colonists of the baser sort kept arriving in +cargoes, and gradually the Netherlands Company allowed persons +not of their own nation to land and settle under severe fiscal and +other restrictions. Among these were a number of French +Huguenots, good men, driven from their homes by the revocation +of the Edict of Nantes in 1690. Then Flemings, Germans, Poles, +and others constantly swelled the ranks. All these Europeans +were forced to submit to the arbitrary rules of the Netherlands +Company's agents, scarcely at all restrained from Amsterdam. +Unofficial residents, known as Burghers, came to be admitted to +share in the management of affairs. It was for their benefit +chiefly, that as soon as the Hottentots were found to be unworkable +as slaves, Negroes from West Africa and Malays from the East +Indies began to be imported for the purpose. In 1772, when the +settlement was a hundred and twenty years old, and had been in +what was considered working order for a century, Cape Town +and its suburbs had a population of 1,963 officials and servants +of the Company, 4,628 male and 3,750 female colonists, and 8,335 +slaves. In these figures no account is taken of the Hottentots +and others employed in menial capacities, nor of the black +prisoners, among whom, in 1772, a Swedish traveller saw 950 +men, women, and children of the Bushman race, who had been +captured about a hundred and fifty miles from Cape Town in a +war brought about by encroachment on their lands.<a name="FNanchor_8_8" href="#Footnote_8_8">[8]</a></p> + +<p>The Aborigines Protection Society endorses the following +statement of Sparrman (visit to the Cape of Good Hope, 1786, +Vol. II, p. 165,) who says, "The Slave business, that violent outrage +against the natural rights of man, which is always a crime +and leads to all manner of wickedness, is exercised by the Colonists +with a cruelty that merits the abhorrence of everyone, though I +have been told that they pique themselves upon it; and not only +is the capture of the Hottentots considered by them merely as a +party of pleasure, but in cold blood they destroy the bands which +nature has knit between husband and wife, and between parents +and their children. Does a Colonist at any time get sight of a +Bushman, he takes fire immediately, and spirits up his horse and +dogs, in order to hunt him with more ardour and fury than he +would a wolf or any other wild beast.".</p> + +<p>"I am far from accusing all the colonists," he continues, +"of these cruelties, which are too frequently committed. While +some of them plumed themselves upon them, there were many +who, on the contrary, held them in abomination, and feared lest +the vengeance of Heaven should, for all their crimes, fall upon +their posterity."</p> + +<p>The inability of the Amsterdam authorities to control the +filibustering zeal of the colonists rendered it easy for the people +at the Cape to establish among themselves, in 1793, what purported +to be an independent Republic. One of their proclamations +contained the following resolution, aimed especially at the efforts +of the missionaries—most of whom were then Moravians—to save +the natives from utter ruin: "We will not permit any Moravians +to live here and instruct the Hottentots; for, as there are many +Christians who receive no instruction, it is not proper that the +Hottentots should be taught; they must remain in the same +state as before. Hottentots born on the estate of a farmer must +live there, and serve him until they are twenty-five years old, +before they receive any wages. All Bushmen or wild Hottentots +caught by us must remain slaves for life."<a name="FNanchor_9_9" href="#Footnote_9_9">[9]</a></p> + +<p>I have given these facts of more than a hundred years ago to +show for how long a time the traditions of the usefulness and +lawfulness of Slavery had been engrained in the minds of the +Dutch settlers. We ought not, perhaps, to censure too severely +the Boer proclivities in favour of that ancient institution, nor to +be surprised if it should be a work of time, accompanied with +severe Providential chastisement, to uproot that fixed idea from +the minds of the present generation, of Boer descent. The sin +of enslaving their fellow-men may perhaps be reckoned, for them, +among the "sins of ignorance." Nevertheless, the Recording +Angel has not failed through all these generations to mark the +woes of the slaves; and the historic vengeance, which sooner or +later infallibly follows a century or centuries of the violation of +the Divine Law and of human rights, will not be postponed or +averted even by a late repentance on the part of the transgressors. +It is striking to note how often in history the sore judgment of +oppressors has fallen (in this world), not on those who were first +in the guilt, but on their successors, just as they were entering +on an amended course of "ceasing to do evil and learning to do +well."</p> + +<p>In 1795, Cape Town was formally ceded by the Prince of +Orange to Great Britain, as an incident of the great war with +France, for which, six million pounds sterling was paid by Great +Britain to Holland. British supremacy was formally recognized +in this part of South Africa by a Convention signed in 1814, +which was confirmed by the Treaty of Paris in 1815.</p> + +<p>British rule for some thirty years after 1806 was perforce +despotic, but for the most part, with some exceptions, it was a +benevolent despotism. "They had the difficult task of controlling a +straggling white community, at first almost exclusively composed +of Boers, who had been too sturdy and stubborn to tolerate any +effective interference by the Netherlands Company and other +authorities in Holland, and who resented both English domination +and the advent of English colonists which more than +doubled the white population in less than two decades." "The +Governors sent out from Downing Street had tasks imposed +upon them which were beyond the powers of even the wisest and +worthiest. Most of the English colonists found it easier to fall +in with the thoughts and habits of the Boers than to uphold the +purer traditions of life and conduct in the mother country, and it +is not strange that many of the officials should have been in like +case."<a name="FNanchor_10_10" href="#Footnote_10_10">[10]</a></p> + +<p>Great Britain abolished the Slave Trade in 1807, which +prevented the further importation of Slaves, and the traffic in +them.</p> + +<p>The great Emancipation Act, by which Great Britain +abolished Slavery in all lands over which she had control, was +passed in 1834.</p> + +<p>The great grievance for the Burghers was this abolition of +slavery by Great Britain. According to a Parliamentary Return +of March, 1838, the slaves of all sorts liberated in Cape Colony +numbered 35,750. The British Parliament awarded as compensation +to the slave owners throughout the British dominions a +sum of £20,000,000, of which, nearly £1,500,000 fell to the share +of the Burghers. Concerning this Act of Compensation there +have been very divided opinions; there is not a doubt that the +British Government intended to deal fairly by the former slave +owners, but it is stated that there was great and culpable +carelessness on the part of the British agents in distributing this +compensation money. It seems that many of the Burghers to +whom it was due never obtained it, and these considered themselves +aggrieved and defrauded by the British Government. +On the other hand, there are persons who have continually +disapproved of the principle of compensation for a wrong given +up, or the loss of an advantage unrighteously purchased. It is +however to be regretted, that an excuse should have been given +for the Boers' complaints by irregularities attributed to the +British in the partition of the compensation money.</p> + +<p>It has often been asserted that the first great Dutch emigration +from the Cape was instigated simply by love of freedom on their +part, and their dislike of British Government. But why did +they dislike British Government? There may have been minor +reasons, but the one great grievance complained of by themselves, +from the first, was the abolition of slavery. They desired to be +free to deal with the natives in their own manner.</p> + +<p>Taking with them their household belongings and as much +cattle as they could collect, they went forth in search of homes in +which they hoped they would be no longer controlled, and as +they thought, sorely wronged by the nation which had invaded +their Colony. But they did not all trek; only about half, it was +estimated, did so. The rest remained, finding it possible to live +and prosper without slavery.</p> + +<p>They crossed the Orange River, and finally trekked beyond +the Vaal.</p> + +<p>From 1833, Cape Colony, under British rule, began to be +endowed with representative institutions. In 1854, the Magna +Charta of the Hottentots, as it was called, was created. It was +a measure of remarkable liberality. "It conferred on all Hottentots +and other free persons of colour lawfully residing in the +Colony, the right to become burghers, and to exercise and enjoy +all the privileges of burghership. It enabled them to acquire +land and other property. It exempted them from any compulsory +service to which other subjects of the Crown were not liable, and +from 'any hindrance, molestation, fine, imprisonment or other +punishment' not awarded to them after trial in due course of law, +'any custom or usage to the contrary in anywise notwithstanding.' +Among other provisions it was stipulated that wages should no +longer be paid to them in liquor or tobacco, and that, in the +event of a servant having reasonable ground of complaint against +his master for ill-usage, and not being able to bear the expense of +a summons, one should be issued to him free of charge. By this +ordinance a stop was put, as far as the law could be enforced, to +the bondage, other than admitted and legalized slavery, by which +through nearly two centuries the Dutch farmers and others had +oppressed the natives whom they had deprived of their lands."<a name="FNanchor_11_11" href="#Footnote_11_11">[11]</a></p> + +<p>The Boers who had trekked resented every attempt at interference +with them on the part of the Cape Government with a +view to their acceptance of such principles of British Government +as are expressed above. Wearied by its hopeless efforts to restore +order among the emigrant farmers, the British Government +abandoned the task, and contented itself with the arrangement +made with Andries Pretorius, in 1852, called the Sand River +Convention. This Convention conceded to "the emigrant +farmers beyond the Vaal River" "the right to manage their +own affairs and to govern themselves, without any interference +on the part of Her Majesty the Queen's Government." It was +stipulated, however, that "no slavery is or shall be permitted or +practised in the country to the north of the Vaal River by the +emigrant farmers." This stipulation has been made in every +succeeding Convention down to that of 1884. These Conventions +have been regularly agreed to and signed by successive Boer +Leaders, and have been as regularly and successively violated.</p> + +<p>FOOTNOTES:</p> + +<p><a name="Footnote_5_5" href="#FNanchor_5_5">[5]</a> South Africa, Past and Present (1899), by Noble.</p> + +<p><a name="Footnote_6_6" href="#FNanchor_6_6">[6]</a> Adolphe Mabille, Published in Paris, 1898.</p> + +<p><a name="Footnote_7_7" href="#FNanchor_7_7">[7]</a> These and other details which follow are taken from +Dutch official papers, giving a succinct account of the treatment +of the natives between 1649 and 1809. These papers were translated +from the Dutch by Lieut. Moodie (1838). See Moodie's "<i>Record</i>."</p> + +<p><a name="Footnote_8_8" href="#FNanchor_8_8">[8]</a> Thunberg. "Travels in Europe, Africa, and Asia, +between 1770 and 1779."</p> + +<p><a name="Footnote_9_9" href="#FNanchor_9_9">[9]</a> Sir John Barrow (Travels in South Africa, 1806.) +Vol ii. p. 165.</p> + +<p><a name="Footnote_10_10" href="#FNanchor_10_10">[10]</a> Mr. Fox Bourne, Secretary of the Aborigines Protection +Society.</p> + +<p><a name="Footnote_11_11" href="#FNanchor_11_11">[11]</a> Parliamentary paper quoted by Mr. Fox Bourne. +"Black and White," page 18.</p> + + + +<hr style="width: 65%;" /> +<h2><a name="III"></a>III.</h2> + +<blockquote><p>DR. LIVINGSTONE'S EXPERIENCES IN THE TRANSVAAL AND IN +SURROUNDING NATIVE DISTRICTS. LETTER OF DR. MOFFAT +IN 1877. LETTER OF HIS SON, REV. J. MOFFAT, 1899. REPORT +OF M. DIETERLEN TO THE COMMITTEE OF THE MISSIONS' +EVANGÉLIQUES OF PARIS.</p></blockquote> + +<p>The following is an extract from the "Missionary Travels +and Researches in South Africa," of the venerable +pioneer, David Livingstone.<a name="FNanchor_12_12" href="#Footnote_12_12">[12]</a></p> + +<p>"An adverse influence with which the mission had to +contend was the vicinity of the Boers of the Cashan Mountains,<a name="FNanchor_13_13" href="#Footnote_13_13">[13]</a> +otherwise named 'Magaliesberg.' These are not to be confounded +with the Cape Colonists, who sometimes pass by the +name. The word 'Boer,' simply means 'farmer,' and is not +synonymous with our word boor. Indeed, to the Boers generally +the latter term would be quite inappropriate, for they are a sober, +industrious, and most hospitable body of peasantry. Those, +however, who have fled from English Law on various pretexts, +and have been joined by English deserters, and every other +variety of bad character in their distant localities, are unfortunately +of a very different stamp. The great objection many of +the Boers had, and still have, to English law, is that it makes no +distinction between black men and white. They felt aggrieved +by their supposed losses in the emancipation of their Hottentot +slaves, and determined to erect themselves into a republic, in +which they might pursue, without molestation, the 'proper +treatment' of the blacks. It is almost needless to add, that the +'proper treatment' has always contained in it the essential +element of slavery, namely, compulsory unpaid labour.</p> + +<p>"One section of this body, under the late Mr. Hendrick +Potgeiter, penetrated the interior as far as the Cashan Mountains, +whence a Zulu chief, named Mosilikátze, had been expelled by +the well known Kaffir Dingaan, and a glad welcome was given +these Boers by the Bechuana tribes, who had just escaped the +hard sway of that cruel chieftain. They came with the prestige +of white men and deliverers; but the Bechuanas soon found, as +they expressed it, 'that Mosilikátze was cruel to his enemies, and +kind to those he conquered; but that the Boers destroyed their +enemies, and made slaves of their friends." The tribes who still +retain the semblance of independence are forced to perform all +the labour of the fields, such as manuring the land, weeding, +reaping, building, making dams and canals, and at the same time +to support themselves. I have myself been an eye-witness of +Boers coming to a village, and according to their usual custom, +demanding twenty or thirty women to weed their gardens, and +have seen these women proceed to the scene of unrequited toil, +carrying their own food on their heads, their children on their +backs, and instruments of labour on their shoulders. Nor have +the Boers any wish to conceal the meanness of thus employing +unpaid labour; on the contrary, every one of them, from Mr. +Potgeiter and Mr. Gert Kruger, the commandants, downwards, +lauded his own humanity and justice in making such an equitable +regulation. 'We make the people work for us, in consideration +of allowing them to live in our country.'</p> + +<p>"I can appeal to the Commandant Kruger if the foregoing is +not a fair and impartial statement of the views of himself and his +people. I am sensible of no mental bias towards or against these +Boers; and during the several journeys I made to the poor +enslaved tribes, I never avoided the whites, but tried to cure and +did administer remedies to their sick, without money and +without price. It is due to them to state that I was invariably +treated with respect; but it is most unfortunate that they +should have been left by their own Church for so many years to +deteriorate and become as degraded as the blacks, whom the +stupid prejudice against colour leads them to detest.</p> + +<p>"This new species of slavery which they have adopted serves +to supply the lack of field labour only. The demand for domestic +servants must be met by forays on tribes which have good supplies +of cattle. The Portuguese can quote instances in which blacks +become so degraded by the love of strong drink as actually to +sell themselves; but never in any one case, within the memory +of man, has a Bechuana Chief sold any of his people, or a +Bechuana man his child. Hence the necessity for a foray to +seize children. And those individual Boers who would not +engage in it for the sake of slaves, can seldom resist the twofold +plea of a well-told story of an intended uprising of the devoted +tribe, and the prospect of handsome pay in the division of +captured cattle besides. It is difficult for a person in a civilized +country to conceive that any body of men possessing the common +attributes of humanity, (and these Boers are by no means +destitute of the better feelings of our nature,) should with one +accord set out, after loading their own wives and children with +caresses, and proceed to shoot down in cold blood, men and +women of a different colour, it is true, but possessed of domestic +feelings and affections equal to their own. I saw and conversed +with children in the houses of Boers who had by their own and +their master's account been captured, and in several instances I +traced the parents of these unfortunates, though the plan approved +by the long-headed among the burghers is to take children +so young that they soon forget their parents and their native +language also. It was long before I could give credit to the +tales of bloodshed told by native witnesses, and had I received no +other testimony but theirs, I should probably have continued +sceptical to this day as to the truth of the accounts; but when I +found the Boers themselves, some bewailing and denouncing, +others glorying in the bloody scenes in which they had been +themselves the actors, I was compelled to admit the validity of +the testimony, and try to account for the cruel anomaly. They +are all traditionally religious, tracing their descent from some of +the best men (Huguenots and Dutch) the world ever saw. Hence +they claim to themselves the title of 'Christians,' and all the +coloured race are 'black property' or 'creatures.' They being +the chosen people of God, the heathen are given to them for an +inheritance, and they are the rod of divine vengeance on the +heathen, as were the Jews of old.</p> + +<p>"Living in the midst of a native population much larger than +themselves, and at fountains removed many miles from each +other, they feel somewhat in the same insecure position as do the +Americans in the Southern States. The first question put by +them to strangers is respecting peace; and when they receive +reports from disaffected or envious natives against any tribe, the +case assumes all the appearance and proportions of a regular +insurrection. Severe measures then appear to the most mildly +disposed among them as imperatively called for, and, however +bloody the massacre that follows, no qualms of conscience ensue: +it is a dire necessity for the sake of peace. Indeed, the late Mr. +Hendrick Potgeiter most devoutly believed himself to be the great +peace-maker of the country.</p> + +<p>"But how is it that the natives, being so vastly superior in +numbers to the Boers, do not rise and annihilate them? The +people among whom they live are Bechuanas, not Kaffirs, though +no one would ever learn that distinction from a Boer; and history +does not contain one single instance in which the Bechuanas, even +those of them who possess firearms, have attacked either the +Boers or the English. If there is such an instance, I am certain +it is not generally known, either beyond or in the Cape Colony. +They have defended themselves when attacked, as in the case of +Sechele, but have never engaged in offensive war with Europeans. +We have a very different tale to tell of the Kaffirs, and the +difference has always been so evident to these border Boers that, +ever since 'those magnificent savages,' (the Kaffirs,) obtained +possession of firearms, not one Boer has ever attempted to settle +in Kaffirland, or even face them as an enemy in the field. The +Boers have generally manifested a marked antipathy to anything +but 'long-shot' warfare, and, sidling away in their emigrations +towards the more effeminate Bechuanas, they have left their +quarrels with the Kaffirs to be settled by the English, and their +wars to be paid for by English gold.</p> + +<p>"The Bechuanas at Kolobeng had the spectacle of various +tribes enslaved before their eyes;—the Bakatla, the Batlo'kua, the +Bahúkeng, the Bamosétla, and two other tribes of Bechuanas, +were all groaning under the oppression of unrequited labour. +This would not have been felt as so great an evil, but that the +young men of those tribes, anxious to obtain cattle, the only +means of rising to respectability and importance among their own +people, were in the habit of sallying forth, like our Irish and +Highland reapers, to procure work in the Cape Colony. After +labouring there three or four years, in building stone dykes and +dams for the Dutch farmers, they were well content if at the end +of that time they could return with as many cows. On presenting +one to the chief, they ranked as respectable men in the tribe ever +afterwards. These volunteers were highly esteemed among the +Dutch, under the name of Mantátees. They were paid at the +rate of one shilling a day, and a large loaf of bread among six of +them. Numbers of them, who had formerly seen me about +twelve hundred miles inland from the Cape, recognised me with +the loud laughter of joy when I was passing them at their work +in the Roggefelt and Bokkefelt, within a few days of Cape Town. +I conversed with them, and with Elders of the Dutch Church, +for whom they were working, and found that the system was +thoroughly satisfactory to both parties. I do not believe that +there is a Boer, in the Cashan or Magaliesberg country, who +would deny that a law was made, in consequence of this labour +passing to the Colony, to deprive these labourers of their hardly-earned +cattle, for the very urgent reason that, "if they want to +work, let them work for us, their masters," though boasting that +in their case their work would not be paid.</p> + +<p>"I can never cease to be most unfeignedly thankful that I was +not born in a land of slaves. No one can understand the effect of +the unutterable meanness of the slave system on the minds of +those who, but for the strange obliquity which prevents them +from feeling the degradation of not being gentlemen enough to +pay for services rendered, would be equal in virtue to ourselves."</p> + +<p>After giving his experience of eight years in Sechele's +country, in Bechuanaland, Livingstone continues:—"During +that time, no winter passed without one or two of the tribes in +the east country being plundered of both cattle and children by +the Boers. The plan pursued is the following: one or two +friendly tribes are forced to accompany a party of mounted +Boers. When they reach the tribe to be attacked, the friendly +natives are ranged in front, to form, as they say, 'a shield;' the +Boers then coolly fire over their heads till the devoted people flee +and leave cattle, wives and children to their captors. This was +done in nine cases during my residence in the interior, and on no +occasion was a drop of Boer's blood shed. News of these deeds +spread quickly among the Bechuanas, and letters were repeatedly +sent by the Boers to Sechele, ordering him to come and surrender +himself as their vassal, and stop English traders from proceeding +into the country. But the discovery of lake Ngami, hereafter to +be described, made the traders come in five-fold greater numbers, +and Sechele replied, 'I was made an independent chief and +placed here by God, and not by you. I was never conquered by +Mosilikátze, as those tribes whom you rule over; and the English +are my friends; I get everything I wish from them; I cannot +hinder them from going where they like.' Those who are old +enough to remember the threatened invasion of our own island, +may understand the effect which the constant danger of a Boer +invasion had on the minds of the Bechuanas; but no others can +conceive how worrying were the messages and threats from the +endless self-constituted authorities of the Magaliesberg Boers, and +when to all this harassing annoyance was added the scarcity +produced by the drought, we could not wonder at, though we felt +sorry for, their indisposition to receive instruction.</p> + +<p>"I attempted to benefit the native tribes among the Boers of +Magaliesberg by placing native teachers at different points. +'You must teach the blacks,' said Mr. Hendrick Potgeiter, the +commandant in chief, 'that they are not equal to us.' Other +Boers told me 'I might as well teach the baboons on the rocks +as the Africans,' but declined the test which I proposed, namely, +to examine whether they or my native attendants could read best. +Two of their clergymen came to baptize the children of the +Boers, so, supposing these good men would assist me in overcoming +the repugnance of their flock to the education of the +blacks, I called on them, but my visit ended in a <i>ruse</i> practised +by the Boerish commandant, whereby I was led, by professions +of the greatest friendship, to retire to Kolobeng, while a letter +passed me, by another way, to the missionaries in the south, +demanding my instant recall for 'lending a cannon to their +enemies.'<a name="FNanchor_14_14" href="#Footnote_14_14">[14]</a></p> + +<p>"These notices of the Boers are not intended to produce a +sneer at their ignorance, but to excite the compassion of their +friends.</p> + +<p>"They are perpetually talking about their laws; but practically +theirs is only the law of the strongest. The Bechuanas could +never understand the changes which took place in their commandants. +'Why, one can never know who is the chief among +these Boers. Like the Bushmen, they have no king—they must +be the Bushmen of the English.' The idea that any tribe of +men could be so senseless as not to have an hereditary chief was +so absurd to these people, that in order not to appear equally +stupid, I was obliged to tell them that we English were so +anxious to preserve the royal blood that we had made a young +lady our chief. This seemed to them a most convincing proof of +our sound sense. We shall see farther on the confidence my +account of our Queen inspired. The Boers, encouraged by the +accession of Mr. Pretorius, determined at last to put a stop to +English traders going past Kolobeng, by dispersing the tribe of +Bechuanas, and expelling all the missionaries. Sir George +Cathcart proclaimed the independence of the Boers. A treaty +was entered into with them; an article for the free passage of +Englishmen to the country beyond, and also another, that <i>no +slavery should be allowed in the independent territory</i>, were duly +inserted, as expressive of the views of Her Majesty's Government +at home. 'But what about the missionaries?' enquired +the Boers. '<i>You may do as you please with them</i>,' is said to have +been the answer of the Commissioner. This remark, if uttered +at all, was probably made in joke: designing men, however, +circulated it, and caused the general belief in its accuracy which +now prevails all over the country, and doubtless led to the +destruction of three mission stations immediately after. The +Boers, 400 in number, were sent by the late Mr. Pretorius to +attack the Bechuanas in 1852. Boasting that the English had +given up all the blacks into their power, and had agreed to aid +them in their subjugation by preventing all supplies of ammunition +from coming into the Bechuana country, they assaulted the +Bechuanas, and, besides killing a considerable number of adults, +carried off 200 of our school children into slavery. The natives, +under Sechele, defended themselves till the approach of night +enabled them to flee to the mountains; and having in that +defence killed a number of the enemy, the very first ever slain in +this country by Bechuanas, I received the credit of having taught +the tribe to kill Boers! My house, which had stood perfectly +secure for years under the protection of the natives, was plundered +in revenge. English gentlemen, who had come in the footsteps +of Mr. Cumming to hunt in the country beyond, and had deposited +large quantities of stores in the same keeping, and upwards of +eighty head of cattle as relays for the return journeys, were +robbed of all; and when they came back to Kolobeng, found the +skeletons of the guardians strewed all over the place. The books +of a good library—my solace in our solitude—were not taken +away, but handfuls of the leaves were torn out and scattered over +the place. My stock of medicines was smashed; and all our +furniture and clothing carried off and sold at public auction to +pay the expenses of the foray. I do not mention these things by +way of making a pitiful wail over my losses, in order to excite +commiseration; for though I feel sorry for the loss of lexicons, +dictionaries, &c., &c., which had been the companions of my +boyhood, yet, after all, the plundering only set me entirely free +for my expedition to the north, and I have never since had a +moment's concern for anything I left behind. The Boers resolved +to shut up the interior, and I determined to open the country."</p> + +<hr style='width: 45%;' /> + +<p>Mr. A. McArthur, of Holland Park, wrote on March 22nd of +this year:—</p> + +<p>"When looking over some old letters a few days ago, I found +one from the late venerable Dr. Moffat, who was one of the best +friends South Africa ever had. It was written in answer to a few +lines I wrote him, informing him that the Transvaal had been +annexed by the British Government. I enclose a copy of his +letter."</p> + +<p>Dr. Moffat's letter is as follows:—July 27th, 1877.</p> + +<p>"My dear friend,</p> + +<p>"I have no words to express the pleasure the late annexation +of the Transvaal territory to the Cape Colony has afforded me. +It is one of the most important measures our Government could +have adopted, as regards the Republic as well as the Aborigines. +I have no hesitation in pronouncing the step as being fraught +with incalculable benefits to both parties,—i.e., the settlers and +the native tribes. A residence of more than half a century beyond +the colonial boundary is quite sufficient to authorize one to write +with confidence that Lord Carnarvon's measure will be the +commencement of an era of blessing to Southern Africa. I was +one of a deputation appointed by a committee to wait on +Sir George Clarke, at Bloemfontein, to prevent, if possible, his +handing over the sovereignty, now the Free State, to the emigrant +Boers. Every effort failed to prevent the blunder. Long +experience had led many to foresee that such a course would +entail on the native tribes conterminous oppression, slavery, +<i>alias</i> apprenticeship, etc. Many a tale of woe could be told +arising, as they express it, from the English allowing their +subjects to spoil and exterminate. Hitherto, the natives have +been the sufferers, and might justly lay claim for compensation. +With every expression of respect and esteem, I remain, yours +very sincerely, Robert Moffat."</p> + +<hr style='width: 45%;' /> + +<p>A letter from a Son of Dr. Moffat may have some interest +here. It is dated December 20th, 1899.</p> + +<p>The Rev. John Moffat, son of the famous Dr. Moffat, and +himself for a long time resident in South Africa, has sent to a +friend in London a letter regarding the relations of the British and +Dutch races previous to the war. Mr. Moffat, throughout his +varied experiences, has been a special friend to the natives. One +of his younger sons, Howard, is with a force of natives 60 miles +south west of Khama's town (at the time of writing, December +20th), and Dr. Alford Moffat, another son, was medical officer to +300 Volunteers occupying the Mangwe Pass, to prevent a Boer +raid into Rhodesia at that point.</p> + +<p>He writes:—</p> + +<p>"1. <i>Had Steyn sat still and minded his own business</i> no one +would have meddled with him. Had Kruger confined himself +strictly to self-defence, and <i>we</i> had invaded <i>him</i>, +we might have had to blame ourselves.</p> + +<p>"2. To have placed an adequate defensive force on our +borders before we were sure that there was going to be war would +have been accepted (perhaps justly) by the Boers as a menace. +We did not do it, out of respect for their susceptibilities.</p> + +<p>"3. To most people in South Africa who knew the Boers it +was quite plain that Kruger was all along playing what is +colloquially known as the game of 'spoof.' He never intended to +make the slightest concession.</p> + +<p>"4. Take them as a whole, the Boers are not pleasant +people to live with, especially to those who are within their +power, as the natives have found out sufficiently, and as the +British have found out ever since Majuba, and the retrocession of +the Transvaal. The wrongs of the Uitlanders were only one +symptom of a disease which originated at Pretoria in 1881, and +was steadily spreading itself all over South Africa.</p> + +<p>"5. With regard to the equal rights question, it is quite +true that all is not as it ought to be in the Cape Colony. But +the condition of the native in the Transvaal is 100 years behind +that of our natives in the Cape Colony, and you may take it as a +broad fact that in proportion as Boer domination prevails the +gravitation of the native towards slavery will be accelerated."</p> + +<p>In conclusion, Mr. Moffat has this to say of the "Boer dream +of Afrikander predominance": "We, who have been living out +here, have been hearing about this thing for years, but we have +tried not to believe it. We felt, many of us, that the struggle +had to come, but we held our peace because we did not want to +be charged with fomenting race hatred." He refers to Ben +Viljoen's manifesto of September 29th, and to President Steyn's +manifesto, and State Secretary Reitz's proclamation of October +11th, and says, "When I read these in conjunction with the +history of South Africa for the last 18 years, I see that the cause +of peace was hopeless in such hands."</p> + +<hr style='width: 45%;' /> + +<p>Almost contemporaneously with the expression of opinion of +Dr. Moffat (in 1877), the following report was written by M. +Dieterlen, to the Committee of the <i>Missions Evangéliques +de Paris</i>:—</p> + +<p class='right'>"Lessouto, June 28th, 1876.</p> + +<p>"Gentlemen,</p> + +<p>"I must give you details of the journey which I have just +made with four native evangelists; for no doubt you will wish to +know why a missionary expedition, begun under the happiest +auspices, and with the good wishes of so many Christians, has +come to grief, on account of the ill-will of certain men, and has +been, from a human point of view, a humiliating failure. Having +placed myself at the head of the expedition, and being the only +white man in the missionary group, I must bear the whole +responsibility of our return, and if there is anyone to blame it +is I.</p> + +<p>"From our departure from Leriba, as far as the other side +of Pretoria, our voyage was most agreeable. We went on with +energy, thinking only of our destination, the Banyaïs country, +making plans for our settling amongst those people, and full of +happiness at the thought of our new enterprise. An excellent +spirit prevailed in our little troop,—serious and gay at the same +time; no regrets, no murmurings; with a presentiment, indeed, +that the Transvaal Government might make some objection to +our advance, but with the certainty that God was with us, and +would over-rule all that man might try to do. We crossed the +Orange Free State without hindrance, we passed the Vaal, and +continued our route towards the capital of the Transvaal; we +reached the first village through which we must pass—Heidelberg—and +encamped some distance from there. There they told us +that the Boers knew that we were about to pass, and if they +wished to stop us, it would be there they would do it. Let us +take courage, therefore, we said, and be ready for everything. +We unharnessed, and walked through the village in full daylight, +posting our letters, etc. No one stopped us or spoke to us, and +we retired to our encampment, thanking God that He had kept +us through this critical moment. Some days later, we approached +a charming spot, within three hours of Pretoria, near a clear +stream, surrounded with lovely trees and flowers; we took the +Communion together, strengthening each other for the future. +Monday, at nine o'clock, we reached Pretoria. We were looked +at with curiosity; they read our names on the sides of my +waggon, they seemed surprised, and held discussions among +themselves; the Field Cornet himself saw us pass, they told me +sometime later. But we passed through the town without +opposition.</p> + +<p>"We continued our way to the north-east full of thankfulness, +saying to each other that after all the Government of the +Transvaal was not so ill-disposed towards us. Our oxen continued +to walk with sturdy steps; we had not yet lost one, although the +cattle plague was prevalent at the time. Wednesday, at four +o'clock in the evening, we left the house of an English merchant, +with whom we had passed a little time, and who had placed at +our disposal everything which we needed. Towards eight o'clock, +by a splendid moonlight, I was walking in front of my waggon +with Asser (one of the native missionaries), seeking a suitable +place where we could pass the night, when two horsemen galloped +up, and drawing bridle, brusquely asked for my papers, and +seeing that I had not the papers that they desired, ordered us to +turn round and go back to Pretoria. One of these men was the +Sheriff, who showed me a warrant for my arrest, and putting his +hand on my shoulder, declared me to be his prisoner. This, I +may say in passing, made little impression on me. We retraced +our steps, always believing that when we had paid some duty +exacted for our luggage and our goods, we should be allowed to +go in peace. Towards midnight they permitted us to unharness +near a farm. The next morning these gentlemen searched all +through the waggon of the native evangelists, and put any objects +which they suspected aside. All this, with my waggon, must be +sent back to Pretoria, there to be inspected by anyone who +chose.</p> + +<p>"That same day I arrived in Pretoria in a cart, seated +between the Field Cornet and the Sheriff, who were much +softened when they saw that I did not reply to them in the tone +which they themselves adopted, and that I had not much the +look of a smuggler. The Secretary of the Executive Council +exacted from me bail to the amount of £300 sterling, for which a +German missionary from Berlin, Mr. Grüneberger, had the +goodness to be my guarantor. I made a deposition, saying who +we were, whence we came, and where we were going, insisting +that we had no merchandise in our waggon, only little objects of +exchange by which we could procure food in countries where +money has no value. We had no intention of establishing ourselves +within the limits of the Transvaal; we were going beyond +the Limpopo, and consequently were simple travellers, and +were not legally required to take any steps in regard to the +Government, nor even to ask a passport. All this was written +down and addressed to the Executive Committee, who took the +matter in hand.</p> + +<p>"As they, however, accused us of being smugglers, and +having somewhere a cannon, they proceeded to the examination of +my waggon. They opened everything, ran their hands in everywhere, +into biscuit boxes, among clothes, among candles, etc., +and found neither cannon nor petroleum. The comedy of the +smuggling ended, they took note of the contents of my boxes, and +then attacked us from another side. They decided to treat me +as a missionary. The Solicitor-General said to me that the +Government did not care to have French missionaries going to +the other side of the Limpopo. I said, 'these countries do not +belong to the Transvaal;' to which they replied, 'Do you know +what our intentions are? Have you not heard of the treaties +which we have been able to make with the natives and with the +Portuguese?' There! that is the reply which they made to me. +They took good care not to inscribe it in the document in which +they ordered us to leave the Transvaal immediately. These are +things which they do not care to write, lest they should awaken +the just susceptibilities of other Governments, or arouse the +indignation of all true Christians. But there is the secret of the +policy of the Transvaal in regard to us missionaries; they feared +us, because they know our attachment to the natives, and our +devotion to their interests.</p> + +<p>"They then ordered me to retrace at once my steps, threatening +confiscation of our goods and the imprisonment of our persons +if we attempted to force a passage through the country. I had to +pay £14 sterling for the expenses of this mock trial. They +brought the four native Evangelists out of the prison where they +had spent two nights and a day in a very unpleasant manner; +they gave me leave to take our two waggons out of the square of +the Hotel de Ville where they had been put, together with the +Transvaal Artillery, some pieces of ordnance, a large Prussian +cannon and a French mitrailleuse from Berlin.</p> + +<p>"We were free, we were again united, but what a sorrowful +reunion! We could hardly believe that all was ended, and that +we must retrace our steps; so many hopes dissipated in a +moment! and the thought of having to turn back after having +arrived so near to our destination, was heart breaking. We were +all rather sad, asking each other if we were merely the sport of a +bad dream or if this was indeed the will of God. T resolved to +make one more effort and ask an interview with the President of +the Transvaal, Mr. Burgers. It was granted to me. I went +therefore to the Cabinet of the President and spoke a long time +with the Solicitor-General, protesting energetically against the +force they had used against us, and I discussed the matter also +with the President himself, but without being able to obtain any +reasonable reply to the objections I raised. I saw clearly that I +had to do with men determined to have their own way, and +putting what they chose to consider the interests of the State +above those of all Divine and human laws.</p> + +<p>"Their Parliament (Raad) was sitting, and I addressed +myself to two of its members whom I had seen the day before, +and who had seemed annoyed at the conduct of the Government +towards us. I besought them for the honour of their country, to +bring before their Parliament a question on the subject; but they +dared not consent to this, declaring that if the Government were +to put the matter before the representatives of the country these +latter would decide in our favour, but that they could never take +the initiative.</p> + +<p>"I had now exhausted all the means at my disposal. I did +all I could to obtain leave to continue our journey, and only +capitulated at the last extremity. I received a written order +from the Government telling me to leave the soil of the Republic +immediately.</p> + +<p>"These gentlemen had made me wait a long time, perhaps +because they found it more difficult and dangerous to put down +on paper orders which it was much easier to give vocally. This +note was only a reproduction of the accusations they had made +against us from the beginning. They declared to us that we +were driven from the country because we had introduced guns, +ammunition, and a great quantity of merchandise, and because +we had entered the Transvaal without a passport, in spite of the +Government itself having recently proclaimed a passport unnecessary +for evangelists going through the country. In this document +they systematically misrepresented and violated the right which +every white man had had until then of travelling without +permission. From the beginning to the end of this document it +was open to criticism, which the feeblest jurist could have made; +but in the Transvaal, as elsewhere, might dominates right, and +we have to suffer the consequences of this odious principle.</p> + +<p>"We sorrowfully retraced the route towards the Vaal; this +time no more joyous singing around our fire at night, no more +cheerful projects, no more the hope of being the first to announce +the glad Evangel among pagan populations. The veldt we +traversed seemed to have lost its poetry and to have become +desolate. To add to our misfortunes the epidemic seized our +oxen. We lost first one and then a second,—altogether eight. +Those which were left, tired and lean, dragged slowly and with +pain the waggons which before they had drawn along with such +vigour. At last we were in sight of Mabolela, and arrived at our +destination, sorrowful, yet not unhappy, determined not to be +discouraged by this first check. And now we were again at +Lessouto, waiting for God to open to us a new door."</p> + +<p>FOOTNOTES:</p> + +<p><a name="Footnote_12_12" href="#FNanchor_12_12">[12]</a> The extract commences at chapter II, page 29.</p> + +<p><a name="Footnote_13_13" href="#FNanchor_13_13">[13]</a> Near Pretoria.</p> + +<p><a name="Footnote_14_14" href="#FNanchor_14_14">[14]</a> Livingstone had given to the Chief, Sechele, a +large iron pot for cooking purposes, and the form of it excited +the suspicions of the Boers, who reported that it was a cannon. +That pot is now in the Museum, at Cape Town.</p> + + + +<hr style="width: 65%;" /> +<h2><a name="IV"></a>IV.</h2> + +<blockquote><p>INTERVIEW WITH DR. JAMES STEWART, MODERATOR (1899) OF THE +FREE CHURCH OF SCOTLAND. LETTER OF MR. BELLOWS TO +SENATOR HOAR, U.S.A. THE REV. C. PHILLIPS. EXTRACTS +FROM THE "CHRISTIAN AGE," AND FROM M. ELISÉE +RECLUS, GEOGRAPHER. RETROCESSION OF THE TRANSVAAL. +MR. GLADSTONE'S ACTION. ITS EFFECT ON THE TRANSVAAL +LEADERS, AND ITS CONSEQUENCES FOR THE NATIVE SUBJECTS +OF GREAT BRITAIN.</p></blockquote> + +<p>The Rev. Dr. James Stewart, of Lovedale Mission Institute, +South Africa, who, in May, 1899, was elected Moderator +of the General Assembly of the Scotch Free Church, +imparted his views with regard to the Transvaal question to a +representative of the <i>New York Tribune</i> on the occasion of his +visit to Washington in the autumn of 1899, to attend the +Pan-Presbyterian Council as a delegate from the Free Church of +Scotland.</p> + +<p>Dr. Stewart's title to speak on matters connected with the +Transvaal rests upon thirty years' residence in South Africa.</p> + +<p>On the morning of his election as Moderator of the General +Assembly the <i>Scotsman</i> coupled his name with that of Dr. Livingstone +as the men to whom the British Central Africa Protectorate +was due.</p> + +<p>The interview was published in the <i>Tribune</i> of September +24th, 1899.</p> + +<p>Dr. Stewart said:—</p> + +<p>"As to the principle politically in dispute, the British +Government asks nothing more than this—That British subjects +in the Transvaal shall enjoy—I cannot say the same privileges, +but a faint shadow of what every Dutchman, as well as every +man, white and black, in the Cape Colony enjoys. Every Dutchman +in the Cape Colony is treated exactly as if he were an +Englishman; and every subject of Her Majesty the Queen, +black and white, is treated in the Transvaal, and has always +been, as a man of an alien and subject race. The franchise is +only one of many grievances, and it is utterly a mistake to +suppose that England is going to war over a question of mere +franchise. Let us be just, however. There are in the Cape +Colony and out of it loyal Dutchmen, loyal as the day, to the +British power, which is the ruling power. They know the +freedom they enjoy under it, and the folly and futility of trying +to upset it.</p> + +<p>"No superfluous pity or sympathy need be wasted on +President Kruger or the Transvaal Republic. The latter +(Republic) is a shadow of a name, and as great a travesty and +burlesque on the word as it is possible to conceive.</p> + +<p>"Paul Kruger is at the present moment the real troubler of +South Africa. If the spirit and principles which he himself and +his Government represent were to prevail in this struggle, it +would arrest the development of the southern half of the continent. +It is too late in the day by the world's clock for that type of man +or government to continue.</p> + +<p>"The plain fact is this:—President Kruger does not mean +to give, never meant to give, and will not give anything as a +concession in the shape of just and necessary rights, except what +he is forced to give. He wants also to get rid of the suzerainty. +That darkens and poisons his days and disturbs his nights by +fearful dreams. There is no excuse for him, and, as I say, there +need be no sentiment wasted on the subject. Let President +Kruger and his supporters do what is right, and give what is +barely and simply and only necessary as well as right, and the +whole difficulty will pass into solution, to the relief of all concerned +and the preservation of peace in South Africa. If not, +the blame must rest with him.</p> + +<p>"I am sorry I cannot give any information or express any +views different from what I have now stated. They are the +result of thirty years' residence in Africa. But I would ask your +readers to believe that the British Government are rather being +forced into war than choosing it of their own accord. I would +also ask your readers to believe that Sir Alfred Milner, the +present Governor of Cape Colony, though undoubtedly a strong +man, is also one of the least aggressive, most cautious, and +pacific of men; and that he has the entire confidence of the +whole British population of the Cape Colony. I know also that +when he began his rule three years ago, he did so with the +expectation that by pacific measures the Dutch question was +capable of a happier and better solution than that in which the +situation finds it to-day. The question and trouble to-day is, +briefly, whether the British Government is able to give protection +and secure reasonable rights for its subjects abroad."</p> + +<hr style='width: 45%;' /> + +<p>The following was addressed by Mr. John Bellows of +Gloucester, to Senator Hoar, United States, America, and was +published in the <i>New York Tribune</i>, Feb. 22nd, 1900. Mr. Bellows, +on seeing the publication of his letter, wrote the following +postscript, to Senator Hoar:—</p> + +<p>"As the foregoing letter was headed by the Editor of the +<i>New York Tribune</i>, 'A Quaker on the War,' I would say, to prevent +misunderstanding, that I speak for myself only, and not for the +Society of Friends, although I entirely believe in its teaching, +that if we love all men we can under no circumstances go to war. +There is, however, a spurious advocacy of peace, which is based, +not upon love to men so much as upon enmity to our own +Government, and which levels against it untrue charges of having +caused the Transvaal War. It was to show the erroneousness of +these charges that I wrote this letter."</p> + +<p>The following is the text of the letter:—</p> + +<p>"Dear Friend, I am glad to receive thy letter, as it gives me +the opportunity of pointing out a misconception into which thou +hast fallen in reference to the Transvaal and its position with +respect to the present war.</p> + +<blockquote><p>"Thou sayest: 'I am myself a great lover of England; +but I do not like to see the two countries joining hands for +warlike purposes, and especially to crush out the freedom of +small and weak nations.'</p></blockquote> + +<p>"To this I willingly assent. I am certain that war is in all +circumstances opposed to that sympathy all men owe one to +another, and to that Greater Source of love and sympathy in +which 'we live and move and have our being.' Where this bond +has been broken, we long for its restoration; but it cannot but +tend to retard this restoration, to impute to one or other of the +parties concerned motives that are entirely foreign to its action. +Peace, to be lasting, must stand on a foundation of truth; and +there is no truth whatever in the idea that the English Government +provoked the present war, or that it intended, at any time during +the negotiations that preceded the war, an attack on the +independence either of the Transvaal or of the Orange Free State. +It is true that President Kruger has for many years carefully +propagated the fear of such an attempt among the Dutch in South +Africa, as a means of separating Boers and Englishmen into two +camps, and as an incentive to their preparing the colossal armament +that has now been brought into play, not to keep the English out of +the Transvaal, but to realise what is called the Afrikander programme +of a Dutch domination over the whole of South Africa. +Thus, he a short time ago imported from Europe 149,000 rifles—nearly +five times as many as the whole military population of the +Transvaal—clearly with a view to arming the Cape Dutch in case of +the general rising he hoped for. The Jameson Raid gave him +exactly the grievance he wanted—to persuade these Cape Dutch +that England sought to crush the Transvaal.</p> + +<p>"An examination of the 'Blue Book,' which contains the +whole of the correspondence immediately preceding the war, will +at once show the patient efforts put forth by the London Cabinet +to maintain peace. There are no irritating words used, and the +last despatch of importance before the outbreak of hostilities, +dealing with the insinuations just alluded to, is not only most +courteous and conciliatory in tone, but it states that the Queen's +Government will give the most solemn guarantees against any +attack upon the independence of the Transvaal either by Great +Britain or the Colonies, or by any foreign power. I am absolutely +certain that no American reading that despatch would say that +President Kruger was justified in seizing the Netherlands Railway +line within one week after he had received it, and cutting the +telegraph wires, to prepare for the invasion of British territory, in +which act of violence lay his last and only hope of forcing England +to fight; his last and desperate chance of setting up a racial +domination instead of the freedom and equality of the two races +that prevail in the Cape and Natal, and that did prevail in the +Orange Free State.</p> + +<p>"The cause of the dispute was this: In 1884 a Convention +was agreed on between Great Britain and the Transvaal, +acknowledging the independence of the Transvaal, subject to +three conditions: that the Boers should not make treaties with +foreign Powers without the consent of the paramount Power in +South Africa, i.e., England; that they should not make slaves of +the native tribes; and that they should guarantee equal treatment +for all the white inhabitants of the country as respects +taxation. As the whole war has risen out of Kruger's persistent +refusal to keep his promises, both verbal and in writing, that he +would observe this condition, I append the clause giving rise to +the contention:—</p> + +<p>"Article XIV. (1884 Convention).—'All persons other than +natives conforming themselves to the laws of the South African +Republic will not be subject in respect to their persons or property +or in respect of their commerce and industry to any taxes, whether +general or local, other than those which are or may be imposed +upon citizens of the said Republic.</p> + +<p>"The mines brought so large a population to Johannesburg +that it at last outnumbered by very far the entire Boer burghers +in the State. Kruger, seeing that the inevitable effect of such an +increase must be the same amalgamation of the new and old +populations which was going on in Natal and Cape Colony, and +to a smaller extent in the Orange Free State, unless artificial +barriers could be devised to keep the races apart, at once set to +to scheme modes of taxation that should evade Article XIV. of the +Convention, throwing the entire burden on the Uitlanders, and +letting the Boers, who were nearly all farmers, escape scot free. +Farmers, for example, use no dynamite, miners do; and President +Kruger gave a monopoly of its supply to a German, non-resident +in the country, who taxed the miners for this article +alone $2,600,000 a year beyond the highest price it could otherwise +have been bought for. This was his own act, the Volksraad +not being consulted. Besides the high price, the quality of the +explosive was bad, often causing accident or death. When it +did cause accident or death, the miners were prosecuted by the +Government, from whose agent they were compelled to buy it, +and fined for having used it!</p> + +<p>"At the time the Convention was signed, in 1884, the franchise +was obtainable after one year's residence. President Kruger +determined to serve the Uitlanders, however, as George III.'s +Government served the American Colonists, that is, tax them +while refusing them representation in the control of the taxes. +He went on at one and the same time increasing their burdens +monstrously, while he prolonged the period of residence that +qualified for a vote from one year to five, and so on, till he made +it fourteen years—or fourteen times as long as when the Convention +was signed. Nor was this all. He reserved the right +personally to veto any Uitlander being placed on the register +even after the fourteen years if he thought he was for any reason +objectionable. That is, the majority of the taxpayers were disfranchised +for ever! These Uitlanders had bought and paid for +60 per cent. of all the property in the Transvaal, and 90 per cent. +of the taxes were levied from them; an amount equal to giving +every Boer in the country $200 a year of plunder.</p> + +<p>"Is a country that is so governed justly to be called a +'Republic?'</p> + +<p>"But even the Boers themselves have been adroitly edged +out of power by Paul Kruger. The Grondwet, or Constitution, +provided that to prevent abuses in legislation, no new law should +be passed until the bill for it had been published three months in +advance. To evade this, Kruger passed all kinds of measures as +amendments to existing laws; which, as he explained, not being +new laws, required no notification! Finally, however, he got the +Volksraad to rescind this article of the Grondwet; and now, as +for some time past, any law of any sort can be passed by a small +clique of Kruger's in secret session of the Raad <i>without notice of +any sort, and without the knowledge or assent of the people</i>. The Boers +have no more voice in such legislation than if they were Chinese. +The Transvaal is only a Republic in the same sense that a +nutshell is a nut, or a fossil oyster shell is an oyster.</p> + +<p>"All that the British Government has ever contended for +with President Kruger has been the fair and honourable observance +of his engagement in respect of equal rights in Article XIV. +of the 1884 Convention. This he has persistently and doggedly +refused, while he has been using the millions of money he has +wrung from the Uitlanders to purchase the material for the war +he has been long years preparing on such a colossal scale to drive +the English out of those Colonies in which they have given +absolute equality to all. It is this very equality which has upset +his calculations, by its leaving too few malcontents among the +Dutch population to make any general rising of them possible in +Natal or the Cape, on which rising Kruger staked his hope of +success in the struggle. As for the Transvaal Boers, the only +part they have in the war is to fight for their independence, which +was never threatened until they invaded British territory, and +thus compelled the Queen's Government to defend it.</p> + +<p>"The only alternative left to England to refuse fighting +would have been the ground that all war is wrong; but as +neither England nor any other nation has ever taken this +Christian ground, there was in reality no alternative. Is it fair +to stigmatise England as endeavouring to crush two small and +weak nations because they have been so small in wisdom and +weak in common sense as to become the tools of the daring +and crafty autocrat who has decoyed both friend and foe into this +war?—I am, with high esteem, thy friend,—JOHN BELLOWS."</p> + +<p>It does not come within the scope of this treatise to deal +with the case of the Uitlanders, but I have given the foregoing, +because it is a clear and concise statement of that case, and +because it expresses the strong conviction that I and many others +have had from the first, that the worst enemy the Boers have is +their own Government. A Government could scarcely be found +less amenable to the principles of all just Law, which exists alike +for Rulers and ruled. These principles have been violated +in the most reckless manner by President Kruger and his +immediate supporters. The Boers are suffering now, and paying +with their life-blood for the sins of their Government. Pity and +sympathy for them, (more especially for those among them who +undoubtedly possess higher qualities than mere military prowess +and physical courage,) are consistent with the strongest condemnation +of the duplicity and lawlessness of their Government.</p> + +<hr style='width: 45%;' /> + +<p>The Rev. Charles Phillips, who has been eleven years in +South Africa, has given his opinion on the native question.</p> + +<p>It was part of the Constitution of the Transvaal that no +equality in Church or State should be permitted between whites +and blacks. In Cape Colony, on the contrary, the Constitution +insisted that there should be no difference in consequence of +colour. Mr. Phillips enumerates the oppressive conditions under +which the natives live in the Transvaal. They may not walk on +the sidepaths, or trade even as small hucksters, or hold land. +Until two years ago there was no marriage law for the blacks, +and that which was then passed was so bad—a £3 fee being +demanded for every marriage, with many other difficulties placed +in the way of marriage—that the missionaries endeavoured to +procure its abolition, and to return to the old state of things. +No help is given towards the education of native children, +though the natives pay 3 per cent. of the revenue, the Boers +paying 7-1/2, and the Uitlanders 89-1/2. The natives have, therefore, +actually been helping to educate the Boer children. "In 1896," +says Mr. Phillips, "only £650 was granted to the schools of those +who paid nine-tenths of the revenue, £63,000 being spent upon +the Boer Schools. In other words, the Uitlander child gets 1s. +10d., the Boer child £8 6s. 1d. The Uitlander pays £7 per head +for the education of every Boer child, and he has to provide in +addition for the education of his own children."</p> + +<hr style='width: 45%;' /> + +<p>The following extract is from a more general point of view, +but one which it is unphilosophical to overlook.</p> + +<p>The <i>Christian Age</i> reproduces a communication from an +American gentleman residing in the Transvaal to the New York +<i>Independent</i>.</p> + +<p>"The Boers," Mr. Dunn says, "are, as a race—with, of +course, individual exceptions—an extraordinary instance of an +arrested civilisation, the date of stoppage being somewhere about +the conclusion of the seventeenth century. But they have not +even stood still at that point. They have distinctly and +dangerously degenerated even from the general standard of +civilisation existing when Jan van Riebeck hoisted the flag of the +Dutch East India Company at Cape Point. The great cardinal +fact in connection with the Uitlander population is that, owing to +their numbers and activity, they have brought in their train an +influx of new wealth into the Transvaal of truly colossal dimensions. +Thus, to sum up the distinctive and divergent characteristics of the +two classes into which the population of the South African Republic +is divided—the Boers, or old population, are conservative, +ignorant, stagnant, and a minority; the Uitlanders, or new +population, are progressive, full of enterprise, energy and work, +and constitute a large majority of the total number of inhabitants.</p> + +<p>"It has so happened, therefore, that the Boers, as the ruling +and dominant class, have hopelessly failed to master or comprehend +the new conditions with which they have been called upon to deal. +They have not, as a body, shown either capacity or desire to treat +the new developments with even a remote appreciation of their +inherent value and inevitable trend. The Boer has simply set +his back against the floodgates, apparently oblivious or indifferent +to the fact that the hugely accumulating forces behind must one +day burst every barrier he may choose to set up. That is the +whole Transvaal situation in a sentence.</p> + +<p>"It is necessary to point out, further, that this blind and +dogged determination on the part of the Boers to 'stop the clock' +affects not merely the Transvaal; it is vitally and perniciously +affecting the whole of South Africa. But for the obstructiveness +and obscurantism of the Transvaal Boers, the rate of progress and +development which would characterise the whole South African +continent would be unparalleled in the history of any other +country. The reactionary policy of the Transvaal is the one +spoke in the wheel. It must therefore be removed in the name of +humanity and civilisation."</p> + +<hr style='width: 45%;' /> + +<p>M. Elisée Reclus, the great Geographer, an able and +admittedly impartial Historian, wrote some years ago in his +"Africa," Vol. 4, page 215:—</p> + +<p>"The patriotic Boers of South Africa still dream of the day +when the two Republics of the Orange and the Transvaal, at first +connected by a common customs union, will be consolidated in a +single 'African Holland,' possibly even in a broader confederacy, +comprising all the Afrikanders from the Cape of Good Hope to +the Zambesi. The Boer families, grouped in every town throughout +South Africa, form, collectively, a single nationality, despite the +accident of political frontiers. The question of the future union +has already been frequently discussed by the delegates of the two +conterminous Republics. But, unless these visions can be realized +during the present generation, they are foredoomed to failure. +Owing to the unprogressive character of the purely Boer +communities and to the rapid expansion of the English-speaking +peoples by natural increase, by direct immigration, and by the +assimilation of the Boers themselves, the future 'South African +Dominion' can, in any case, never be an 'African Holland.' +Whenever the present political divisions are merged in one State, +that State must sooner or later constitute an 'African England,' +whether consolidated under the suzerainty of Great Britain or on +the basis of absolute political autonomy. But the internal +elements of disorder and danger are too multifarious to allow the +European inhabitants of Austral Africa for many generations to +dispense with the protection of the English sceptre.</p> + +<p>"Possessing for two centuries no book except the Bible, the +South African Dutch communities are fond of comparing their +lot with that of the 'Chosen People.' Going forth, like the Jews, +in search of a 'Promised Land,' they never for a moment doubted +that the native populations were specially created for their benefit. +They looked on them as mere 'Canaanites, Amorites, and +Jebusites,' doomed beforehand to slavery or death.</p> + +<p>"They turned the land into a solitude, breaking all political +organization of the natives, destroying all ties of a common +national feeling, and tolerating them only in the capacity of +'apprentices,' another name for slaves.</p> + +<p>"In general, the Boers despise everything that does not +contribute directly to the material prosperity of the family group. +Despite their numerous treks, they have contributed next to +nothing to the scientific exploration of the land.</p> + +<p>"Of all the white intruders, the Dutch Afrikanders show +themselves, as a rule, most hostile to their own kinsmen, the +Netherlanders of the mother country. At a distance the two +races have a certain fellow-feeling for each other, as fully attested +by contemporary literature; but, when brought close together, +the memory of their common origin gives place to a strange +sentiment of aversion. The Boer is extremely sensitive, hence +he is irritated at the civilized Hollanders, who smile at his rude +African customs, and who reply, with apparent ostentation, in a +pure language to the corrupt jargon spoken by the peasantry on +the banks of the Vaal or Limpopo."</p> + +<p>No impartial student of recent South African History can +fail, I think, to see that the results of Mr. Gladstone's policy in +the retrocession of the Transvaal have been unhappy, however +good the impulse which prompted his action. To his supporters +at home, and to many of his admirers throughout Europe, his +action stood for pure magnanimity, and seemed a sort of prophetic +instalment of the Christian spirit which, they hoped, would +pervade international politics in the coming age.</p> + +<p>To the Transvaal leaders it presented a wholly different +aspect. It meant to them weakness, and an acknowledgment of +defeat. "Now let us go on," they felt, "and press towards our +goal, i.e., the expulsion of the British from South Africa." The +attitude and conduct of the Transvaal delegates who came to +London in 1883, and of their chiefs and supporters, throws much +light on this effect produced by the act of Mr. Gladstone.</p> + +<p>There can be no doubt that the desire to supplant British by +Dutch supremacy has existed for a long time. President Kruger +puts back the origin of the opposition of the two races to a very +distant date. In 1881, he said, "In the Cession of the Cape of +Good Hope by the King of Holland to England lies the root out +of which subsequent events and our present struggle have grown." +The Dutch believe themselves,—and not without reason,—capable +of great things, they were moved by an ambition to seize the +power which they believed,—and the retrocession fostered that +belief,—was falling from England's feeble and vacillating grasp. +"Long before the present trouble" says a Member of the British +Parliament well acquainted with South African affairs, "I visited +every town in South Africa of any importance, and was brought +into close contact with every class of the population; wherever +one went, one heard this ambition voiced, either advocated or +deprecated, but never denied. It dates back some forty or fifty +years."<a name="FNanchor_15_15" href="#Footnote_15_15">[15]</a> The first reference to it is in a despatch of Governor +Sir George Grey, in 1858; and it is to be found more definitely in +the speeches of President Burgers in the Transvaal Raad in 1877 +before the annexation, and in his <i>apologia</i> published after the +annexation. The movement continued under the administration +of Sir Bartle Frere, who wrote in a despatch (published in Blue +book) in 1879, "The Anti-English opposition are sedulously +courting the loyal Dutch party (a great majority of the Cape +Dutch) in order to swell the already considerable minority who +are disloyal to the English Crown here and in the Transvaal." +Mr. Theodore Schreiner, the brother of the Cape Premier, in a +letter to the "Cape Times," November, 1899, described a +conversation he had some seventeen years ago with Mr. Reitz, +then a judge, afterwards President of the Orange Free State, and +now State Secretary of the Transvaal, in which Mr. Reitz +admitted that it was his object to overthrow the British power +and expel the British flag from South Africa. Mr. Schreiner +adds; "During the seventeen years that have elapsed I have +watched the propaganda for the overthrow of British power in +South Africa being ceaselessly spread by every possible means, +the press, the pulpit, the platform, the schools, the colleges, the +legislature; and it has culminated in the present war, of which +Mr. Reitz and his co-workers are the origin and the cause."</p> + +<p>The Retrocession of the Transvaal (1881) gave a strong +impulse to this movement, and encouraged President Kruger in +his persistent efforts since that date to foster it. A friend of the +late General Joubert,—in a letter which I have read,—wrote of +Mr. Kruger as "the man who, for more than twenty years past, +has persistently laboured to drive in the wedge between the two +races. It has been his deliberate policy throughout."</p> + +<p>I always wish that I could separate the memory of that truly +great man, Mr. Gladstone, from this Act of his Administration. +Few people cherish his memory with more affectionate admiration +than I do. Independently of his great intellect, his eloquence, +and his fidelity in following to its last consequences a conviction +which had taken possession of him, I revered him because he +seemed like King Saul, to stand a head and shoulders above all +his fellows,—not like King Saul in physical, but in moral stature. +Pure, honourable and strong in character and principles, a sincere +Christian, he attracted and deserved the affection and loyalty of +all to whom purity and honour are dear. I may add that I may +speak of him, in a measure also as a personal friend of our family. +I have memories of delightful intercourse with him at Oxford, +when he represented that constituency, and later, in other places +and at other times.</p> + +<p>I recall, however, an occasion in which a chill of astonishment +and regret fell upon me and my husband (politically one of his +supporters), in hearing a pronouncement from him on a subject, +which to us was vital, and had been pressing heavily on our +hearts. I allude to a great speech which Mr. Gladstone made +in Liverpool during the last period of the Civil War in America, +the Abolitionist War. Our friend spoke with his accustomed +fiery eloquence wholly in favour of the spirit and aims of the +combatants of the Southern States, speaking of their struggle as +one on behalf of liberty and independence, and wishing them +success. Not one word to indicate that the question which, like +burning lava in the heart of a volcano, was causing that terrible +upheaval in America, had found any place in that great man's +mind, or had even "cast its shadow before" in his thoughts. It +appeared as though he had not even taken in the fact of the +existence of those four millions of slaves, the uneasy clanking of +whose chains had long foreboded the approach of the avenging +hand of the Deliverer. This obscured perception of the question +was that of a great part, if not of the majority, of the Press of that +day, and of most persons of the "privileged" classes; but that +<i>he</i>, a trusted leader of so many, should be suffering from such an +imperfection of mental vision, was to us an astonishment and +sorrow. As we left that crowded hall, my companion and I, we +looked at each other in silent amazement, and for a long time we +found no words.</p> + +<p>As I look back now, there seems in this incident some +explanation of Mr. Gladstone's total oblivion of the interests of +our loyal native subjects of the Transvaal at the time when he +handed them over to masters whose policy towards them was well +known. These poor natives had appealed to the British Government, +had trusted it, and were deceived by it.</p> + +<p>I recollect that Mr. Gladstone himself confessed, with much +humility it seemed to us, in a pamphlet written many years after +the American War, that it "had been his misfortune" on several +occasions "not to have perceived the reality and importance of a +question <i>until it was at the door</i>." This was very true. His noble +enthusiasm for some good and vital cause so engrossed him at +times that the humble knocking at the door of some other, perhaps +equally vital question, was not heard by him. The knocking +necessarily became louder and louder, till at last the door was +opened; but then it may have been too late for him to take the +part in it which should have been his.</p> + +<p>FOOTNOTE:</p> + +<p><a name="Footnote_15_15" href="#FNanchor_15_15">[15]</a> Speech of Mr. Drage, M.P., at Derby, December, 1899.</p> + + + +<hr style="width: 65%;" /> +<h2><a name="V"></a>V.</h2> + +<blockquote><p>VISIT OF TRANSVAAL DELEGATES TO ENGLAND. THE LORD +MAYOR'S REFUSAL TO RECEIVE THEM AT THE MANSION HOUSE. +DR. DALE'S LETTER TO MR. GLADSTONE. MR. MACKENZIE +IN ENGLAND. MEETINGS AND RESOLUTIONS ON TRANSVAAL +MATTERS. MANIFESTO OF BOER DELEGATES. SPEECHES OF +W.E. FORSTER, LORD SHAFTESBURY, SIR FOWELL BUXTON, +AND OTHERS. THE LONDON CONVENTION (1884).</p></blockquote> + +<p>In 1883, two years after the retrocession of the Transvaal, the +Boers, encouraged by the hesitating policy of the British +Government, sent a deputation to London of a few of their +most astute statesmen, to put fresh claims before Mr. Gladstone, +and Lord Derby, then Colonial Minister. They did not ask the +repeal of the stipulations of the Convention of 1881—that was +hardly necessary, as these stipulations had neither been observed +by them nor enforced by our Government, but what they desired +and asked was the complete re-establishment of the Republic, +freed from any conditions of British Suzerainty. This would have +given them a free hand in dealing with the natives, a power +which those who knew them best were the least willing to +concede.</p> + +<p>Sir R.N. Fowler was at that time Lord Mayor of London. +According to the custom when any distinguished foreigners visit +our Capital, of giving them a reception at the Mansion House, +these Transvaal delegates were presented for that honour. But +the door of the Mansion House was closed to them, and by a +Quaker Lord Mayor, renowned for his hospitality!</p> + +<p>The explanation of this unusual act is given in the +biography of Sir R. Fowler, written by J.S. Flynn, (page 260.) +The following extract from that biography was sent to the <i>Friend</i>, +the organ of the Society of Friends, in November, 1899, by +Dr. Hodgkin, himself a quaker, whose name is known in the +literary world:—"The scene of Sir R. Fowler's travels in 1881 +was South Africa, where he went chiefly for the purpose of +ascertaining how he could best serve the interests of the native +inhabitants. He left no stone unturned in his search for +information—visiting Sir Hercules Robinson, the Governor of the +Cape, Sir Theophilus Shepstone, Sir Evelyn Wood, Colonel Mitchell, +Bishops Colenso and Macrorie, the Zulu King Cetewayo, the +principal statesmen, the military, the newspaper editors, the +workers at the diamond-fields, and many others. The result of +his inquiries was to confirm his belief of the charges which were +made against the Transvaal Boers of wronging and oppressing +the blacks.</p> + +<p>"It was the opinion of many philanthropists that the only +way to insure good Government in the Transvaal—justice to the +natives, the suppression of slavery, the security of neighbouring +tribes—was by England's insisting on the Boer's observance of +the Treaty which had been made to this effect, and the delimitation +of the boundary of their territory in order to prevent aggression. +With this object in view meetings were held in the City, petitions +presented by Members of Parliament, resolutions moved in the +House; and when at last it was discovered that Mr. Gladstone's +Government was unwilling to fulfil its pledges in reference to +South Africa, and that in consequence the native inhabitants +would not receive the support they had been led to expect, +considerable indignation was felt amongst the friends of the +aborigines. The demand which they made seems to have been +moderate. The Transvaal, which before the war, had been +reckoned, for its protection, a portion of the British dominions, +was now made simply a State under British Suzerainty, with a +debt to England of about a quarter of a million (in lieu of the +English outlay during the three years of its annexation), and a +covenant for the protection of the 800,000 natives in the State, +and the Zulu, Bechuana, and Swazi tribes upon its borders. +The English sympathisers with these natives simply asked that +the covenant should be adhered to. There was little chance of +the debt being paid, and that they were willing to forego; but +they maintained that honour and humanity demanded that the +Boers should not be allowed to treat their agreement with us as +so much waste paper.</p> + +<p>"The Prime Minister and the Secretary of State for the +Colonies received the Transvaal delegates graciously, but the +doors of the Mansion House were shut against them. Its +occupant at that time would neither receive them into his house +nor bid them God-speed. He had made a careful study of the +South African question, and he felt no doubt that this deputation +represented a body of European settlers who were depriving the +natives of their land, slaying their men, and enslaving their +women and children. He desired to extend the hospitality of the +Mansion House to visitors from all countries, and to all creeds +and political parties; but the line must be drawn somewhere, +and he would draw it at the Boers. The boldness of his action +on this occasion startled some even of his friends. He was, of +course, attacked by that portion of the press which supported the +Government. On the other hand, he had numerous sympathisers. +Approving letters and telegrams came from many quarters, one +telegram coming from the 'Loyalists of Kimberley' with 'hearty +congratulations.' As for his opponents, he was not in the least +moved by anything they said. He held it to be impossible for +any respectable person who knew the Boers to support them. +This was no doubt strong language, but it was not stronger than +that of Moffat and Livingstone; not a whit stronger either than +that used by W.E. Forster, who had been a member of the +Gladstonian Government."</p> + +<p>Dr. Hodgkin prefaced this extract by the following lines, +addressed to the Editor of the <i>Friend</i>:</p> + +<p>"Dear Friend,—In re-perusing a few days ago the life of my +late brother-in-law, Sir R.N. Fowler, I came upon the enclosed +passage, which I think worthy of our consideration at the present +time.</p> + +<p>Of late years the disputes between our Government and the +African Republic have turned so entirely on questions connected +with the status of the settlers in and around Johannesburg, that +we may easily forget the old subjects of dispute which existed for +a generation before it was known that there were any workable +goldfields in South Africa, and before the word "Uitlander" had +been mentioned amongst us. I must confess that for my part I had +forgotten this incident of Sir R.N. Fowler's Mayoralty, and I +think it may interest some of your readers to be reminded of it at +the present time. I am, thine truly,—THOMAS HODGKIN. +Barmoor, Northumberland."</p> + +<hr style='width: 45%;' /> + +<p>The late Dr. Dale, of Birmingham, was one of those whose +minds were painfully exercised on the matter of the abandonment +of the natives of the Transvaal to the Boers. An extract from +his life was sent in February this year to the <i>Spectator</i>, with the +following preface:—</p> + +<p>"Sir,—I have been greatly impressed by the justice of much +that has been said in the <i>Spectator</i> on the fact that +the present war is a retribution for our indifference and apathy in +1881. We failed in our duty then. We have taken it up now, but at what a +cost! In reading lately the life of Dr. Dale, of Birmingham, I +was struck by his remarks (pp. 438 and 439) on the Convention +of Pretoria. These remarks have such a bearing on the present +situation that I beg you will allow me to quote them:"—</p> + +<p>"In relation to South African affairs he (Dr. Dale) felt +silence to be impossible. He had welcomed the policy initiated +by the Convention of Pretoria (1881) conceding independence to +the Transvaal, but imposing on the Imperial Government +responsibility for the protection of native races within and beyond +the frontiers. In correspondence with members of the House of +Commons and in more than one public utterance, he expressed +his satisfaction that the freedom of the Boers did not involve the +slavery of the natives. At first the outlook was hopeful, but the +Boers soon began to chafe against the restrictions to which they +were subjected.... The Rev. John Mackenzie brought a +lamentable record of outrage and cruelty.... Dr. Dale +particularly urged that the Government should insist on carrying +out the 18th article of the Convention of Pretoria. 'The policy +of the Government seemed to me both righteous and expedient, +singularly courageous and singularly Christian. But that policy +included two distinct elements. It restored to the Boers internal +independence, it reserved to the British Government powers for +the protection of native races on the Transvaal frontier. It is not +unreasonable for those who in the face of great obloquy supported +the Government in recognising the independence of the Transvaal, +to ask that it should also use its treaty powers, and use them +effectively for the protection of the natives.' To this statement +the <i>Pall Mall</i> (John Morley) replied that the suzerainty over the +Transvaal maintained by us was a 'shadowy term,' and that +those who demanded that our reserved rights should be enforced +were bound to face the question whether they were willing to fight +to enforce them. Was Dr. Dale ready to run the risk of a fresh +war in South Africa? Dr. Dale replied, should the British +Government and British people regard with indifference the +outrages of the Boers against tribes that we had undertaken to +protect?... 'If the Government of the Republic cannot +prevent such crimes as are declared to have been committed in +the Bechuana country, and if we are indifferent to them, we shall +have the South African tribes in a blaze again before many years +are over, and for the safety of our Colonists we shall be compelled +to interfere.' In the ensuing Session the Ministerial policy was +challenged in both Houses of Parliament, and in the Commons +Mr. Forster indicted the Government for its impotence to hold +the Transvaal Republic to its engagements. Dr. Dale wrote a +long letter to Mr. Gladstone:—'If it had been said that power to +protect the natives should be taken but not used, it is at least +possible that a section of the party might have declined to approve +the Ministerial policy.... The one point to which I venture +to direct attention is the contrast, as it appears to me, between +the declaration of Ministers in '81, in relation to the native races +generally, and the position which has been taken in the present +debate.' Mr. Gladstone's reply was courteous, but not reassuring."</p> + +<hr style='width: 45%;' /> + +<p>Mr. Mackenzie, British Commissioner for Bechuanaland, +came to England in 1882. In the following year the Delegates +from the Transvaal came to London, and in 1884 the Convention +was signed, which was called the "London Convention."</p> + +<p>These years included events of great interest. Mr. Mackenzie +wrote:—"On my way to England I met a friend who had just +landed in South Africa from England. He warned me 'If you +say a good word for South Africa, Mr. Mackenzie, you will get +yourself insulted. They will not hear a word on its behalf in +England; they are so disgusted with the mess that has been made.'</p> + +<p>'They had good reason to be disgusted, but I want all the +same to tell them a number of things about the true condition of +the country.'</p> + +<p>'They will not listen,' my friend declared, 'They will only +swear at you.' This was not very encouraging, but it was not far +from the truth as to the public feeling at that time.</p> + +<p>Being in the——counties of England I was offered an +introduction to the Editor of a well-known newspaper, who was +also a pungent writer on social questions under a <i>nom de plume</i> +which had got to be so well known as no longer to serve the +purpose of the writer's concealment of identity.</p> + +<p>'You come from South Africa, do you,' said the great man; +'a place where we have had much trouble, but mean to have no +more.'</p> + +<p>'Trouble, however,' I answered, 'is inseparable from Empire. +Whoever governs South Africa must meet with some trouble and +difficulty, although not much when honestly faced.'</p> + +<p>'I assure you,' he broke in, 'we are not going to try it again +after the one fashion or the other. We are out of it, and we +mean to remain so.'</p> + +<p>'You astonish me,' I answered; 'what about the Convention +recently signed at Pretoria (1881)? What about the speeches +still more recently made in this country in support of it?'</p> + +<p>'As to the Convention, I know we signed something; people +often do when they are getting out of a nasty business. We never +meant to keep it, nor shall we.'</p> + +<p>I believe I whistled a low whistle just to let off the steam, and +then replied calmly, 'Will you allow me to say that by your own +showing you are a bad lot, a very bad lot, as politicians.'</p> + +<p>'That may be, but it does not alter the fact, which is as I state.'</p> + +<p>'Well, I am an outsider, but I assure you that the English +people, should they ever know the facts, will agree with me in +saying that you are a bad lot. Such doctrines in commerce +would ruin us in a day. You know that.'</p> + +<p>'The people are with us. They are disgusted and heart-sore +with the whole business.'</p> + +<p>'I grant you that such is their frame of mind, but I think +their attitude will be different when they come to consider the +facts, and face the responsibilities of our position in South Africa. +The only difficulty with me is to communicate the truth to the +public mind.'</p> + +<p>I was much impressed by this interview. Did this influential +editor represent a large number of English people? Were they +in their own minds out of South Africa, and resolved never to +return?</p> + +<p>... 'I do not know what you think, Mr. Mackenzie, +but we are all saying here that Mr. Gladstone made a great +mistake in not recalling Sir Bartle Frere at once. In fact, we +are of opinion that Frere should have been tried and hanged.'</p> + +<p>The speaker was a fine specimen of an Englishman, tall, with +a good head, intelligent and able as well as strong in speech. He +was a large manufacturer, and a local magnate. His wife was +little and gentle, and yet quite fearless of her grim-looking lord. +She begged that I would always make a deduction when her +husband referred to South Africa. He could never keep his +temper on that subject, My host abruptly demanded, 'But don't +you think that Frere should have been hanged?'</p> + +<p>'My dear, you will frighten Mr. Mackenzie with your +vehemence, and you know you do not mean it a bit.'</p> + +<p>'Mean it! Isn't it what everybody is saying here? At +any rate I have given Mr. Mackenzie a text, and he must now +give me his discourse.'</p> + +<p>I then proceeded to sketch out the work which Sir Bartle +Frere had had before him, its fatal element of haste, with its +calamitous failures in no way chargeable to him. 'In short, I +concluded, but for the grave blunders of others you would have +canonized Sir Bartle Frere instead of speaking of him as you do. +He is the ablest man you ever sent to South Africa. As to his +personal character, I do not know a finer or manlier Christian.' ...</p> + +<p>'I am quite bewildered,' said my host, at the end of a long +conversation. 'I know more of South Africa than I knew before. +But we shall not believe you unless you pitch into someone. You +have not done that yet; you have only explained past history, and +have had a good word for everybody.'</p> + +<p>'Then, Sir,' I quickly answered, 'I pitch into you, and into +your Governments, one after another, for not mastering the facts +of South African life. Why do you now refuse to protect your +own highway into the Interior, and at the same time conserve the +work of the missionaries whom you have supported for two +generations, and thus put an end to the freebooting of the Boers, +and of our own people who joined them? At present there is a +disarmed coloured population, disarmed by your own laws on +account only of their colour; and there is an armed population, +armed under your laws, because they are white; and you decline +to interfere in any way for the protection of the former. You will +neither protect the natives nor give them fair play and an open +field, so that they may protect themselves.'</p> + +<p>'Now, my dear,' said the little wife, 'I wonder who deserves +to be hanged now? I am sure we are obliged to Mr. Mackenzie +for giving us a clear view of things.'</p> + +<p>'No, no, you are always too hasty,' said my host, quite gravely. +'The thing gets very serious. Do I rightly understand you, +Mr. Mackenzie, that practically we Englishmen arm those +freebooters (from the Transvaal,) and practically keep the blacks +disarmed, and that when the blacks have called on us for protection +and have offered themselves and their country to the Queen we +have paid no heed? Is this true?'</p> + +<p>'Every word true,' I replied.</p> + +<p>'Then may I ask, did you not fight for these people? You +had surely got a rifle,' said my host, turning right round on me.</p> + +<p>'My dear, you forget Mr. Mackenzie has been a Missionary,' +said his wife. 'You yourself, as a Director of the London +Missionary Society, would have had him cashiered if he had done +anything of the kind.'</p> + +<p>'Nonsense, you don't see the thing. I assure you I could +not have endured such meanness and injustice. I should have +broken such confounded laws. I should have shouldered a +rifle, I know,' said the indignant man as he paced his room.</p> + +<p>'My dear, you would have got shot, you know,' said his wife.</p> + +<p>'Shot! yes, certainty, why not?' said my host; and added +gravely, 'A fellow would know <i>why</i> he was shot. Is it true, +Mr. Mackenzie, that those blacks were kind to our people who +fled to them from the Transvaal, and that they there protected +them?'</p> + +<p>'Quite true,' I rejoined.</p> + +<p>'Then by heaven,' said Mr.——, raising his voice—</p> + +<p>'Let us go to supper,' broke in the gentle wife, 'you are only +wearying Mr. Mackenzie by your constant wishes to hang some +one.'</p> + +<p>"I trust my friends will forgive me for recalling this +conversation, which vividly pictures the state of people's mind +concerning South Africa in 1882. I found that most people were +incredulous as to the facts being known at the Colonial Office, +and there was a uniform persuasion that Mr. Gladstone was +ignorant that such things were going on."</p> + +<p>I have given these interviews (much abridged) because +they illustrate in a rather humourous way a state of mind which +unhappily has long existed and exists to some degree to this day +in England—an impatience of responsibility for anything +concerning interests lying beyond the shores of our own Island, +a certain superciliousness, and a habit of expressing and adhering +to suddenly formed and violent opinions without sufficient study +of the matters in question,—such opinions being often influenced +by the bias of party politics. Our countrymen are now waking +up to a graver and deeper consideration of the tremendous +interests at stake in our Colonies and Dependencies, and to a +greater readiness to accept responsibilities which once undertaken +it is cowardice to reject or even to complain of.</p> + +<p>At the request of the London Missionary Society, Mr. +Mackenzie drew up an extended account of the Bechuanaland +question, which had a wide circulation. He did not enter into +party politics, but merely gave evidence as to matters of fact. +There was surprise and indignation expressed wherever the matter +was carefully studied and understood. Many resolutions were +transmitted to the Colonial Secretary from public meetings; one +which came from a meeting in the Town Hall of Birmingham +was as, follows:—</p> + +<p>"This meeting earnestly trusts that the British Government +will firmly discharge the responsibilities which they have undertaken +in protection of the native races on the Transvaal border."</p> + +<p>Among the people who took up warmly the cause of the +South African natives were Dr. Conder, Mr. Baines, and Mr. +Yates of Leeds (who addressed themselves directly to Mr. Gladstone), +Dr. Campbell and Dr. Duff of Edinburgh, the Rev. Arnold +Thomas and Mr. Chorlton of Bristol, Mr. Howard of Ashton-under-Lyne, +Mr. Thomas Rigby of Chester, and others.</p> + +<p>A Resolution was sent to the Colonial Office by the Secretary +of the Congregational Union of England and Wales, which had +been passed unanimously at a meeting of that body in Bristol:—</p> + +<p>"That the Assembly of the Congregational Union, recognising +with devout thankfulness the precious and substantial results +of the labours of two generations of Congregational Christian +Missionaries in Bechuanaland, learns with grief and alarm that +the lawless incursions of certain Boers from the Transvaal +threaten the utter ruin of peace, civilization, and Christianity in +that land. This Assembly therefore respectfully and most +urgently entreats Her Majesty's Government, in accordance with +the express provision of the Convention by which Self-Government +was granted to the Boers, to take such steps as shall +eventually put a stop to a state of things as inconsistent with the +pledged word of England as with the progress of the Bechuanaland +nations." Signed at Bristol, Oct. 1882.</p> + +<p>"These," says Mr. Mackenzie, "were not words of war, but +of peace; they were not the words of enemies, but of friends of +the Transvaal, many of whom had been prominent previously in +agitating for the Boers getting back their independence. They +felt that this was the just complement of that action; the Boers +were to have freedom within the Transvaal, but not licence to +turn Bechuanaland (and other neighbouring native states) into a +pandemonium."</p> + +<p>There was a closer contact in Edinburgh with South Africa +than elsewhere, owing to the constant presence at that University +of a large number of students from South Africa. A public +meeting was held in Edinburgh, among the speakers whereat +were Bishop Cotterill, who had lived many years in South Africa; +Mr. Gifford, who had been a long time in Natal; Professor +Calderwood, and Dr. Blaikie, biographer of Dr. Livingstone. +The Venerable Mr. Cullen, the first missionary traveller in +Bechuanaland, who had often entertained Dr. Moffat and +Dr. Livingstone in his house, was present to express his interest +in that country. There were the kindest expressions used +towards our Dutch fellow-subjects; but grave condemnation +was expressed of the Transvaal policy towards the coloured +people in making it a fundamental law that they were not to +be equal to the whites either in Church or State.</p> + +<p>A South African Committee was formed in London from +which a largely supported address was presented to Mr. Gladstone.</p> + +<p>The High Commissioner for Bechuanaland gave his impressions +at several different times during that and the preceding year +on the subject of the constant illegal passing of the Western +Boundary line of the Transvaal by the Boers. Readers will +remember that the delimitation of the western boundary of the +Transvaal was a fixed condition of the Convention of 1881, a +Convention which was continually violated by the Boers. No +rest was permitted for the poor natives of the different tribes on +that side, the Boers' land-hunger continuing to be one of their +strongest passions. The High Commissioner wrote, "If Montsioa +and Mankoroane were now absorbed, Banokwani, Makobi and +Bareki would soon share the same fate. Haseitsiwe and Sechele +would come next. So long as there were native cattle to be +stolen and native lands to be taken possession of, the absorbing +process would be repeated. Tribe after tribe would be pushed +back and back upon other tribes or would perish in the process +until an uninhabitable desert or the sea were reached as the +ultimate boundary of the Transvaal State."<a name="FNanchor_16_16" href="#Footnote_16_16">[16]</a></p> + +<p>The Manifesto presented by the Transvaal delegates to the +English people convinced no one, and its tone was calculated +rather to beget suspicion. The following is an extract from that +document:</p> + +<p>"The horrible misdeeds committed by Spain in America, by +the Dutch in the Indian Archipelago, by England in India, and +by the Southern planters in the United States, constitute an +humiliating portion of the history of mankind, over which we as +Christians may well blush, confessing with a contrite heart our +common guiltiness."</p> + +<p>"The labours of the Anti-slavery and Protection of Aborigines +Societies which have been the means of arousing the public +conscience to the high importance of this matter cannot be, +according to our opinion, sufficiently lauded and encouraged."</p> + +<p>The manifesto then goes on to meet the charges concerning +slavery and ill-treatment of natives brought against the Transvaal +by a flat denial. "They may be true," they say, "as to actions +done long ago, and they humbly pray to the Lord God to +forgive them the sins that may have been committed in hidden +corners. Believe us, therefore, Gentlemen, when we say that +the opposition to our Government is caused by prejudice, and +fed by misunderstanding. If you leave us untrammelled, we +hope to God that before a new generation has passed, a considerable +portion of our natives in the Transvaal will be converted +to Christianity; at least our Government is preparing arrangements +for a more thorough Christian mission among them."</p> + +<p>A public Meeting was held at the Mansion House, called by +the Lord Mayor, Sir R. Fowler, at which the Right Hon. W.E. +Forster, referring to the Sand River and the other Conventions +said: "can anything be more grossly unfair and unjust than on +the one hand, to hand over these native people to the Transvaal +Government, and on the other hand to do our utmost to prevent +them from defending themselves when their rights are attacked? +I cannot conceive any provision more contrary to that principle +of which we are so proud—British fair play."</p> + +<p>Speaking of the treatment of the Bechuanaland people by +the Boers he said: "The story of these men is a very sad one; I +would rather never allude to it again." He then referred to "the +settlement of the western boundary of the Transvaal by Governor +Keate, and the immediate repudiation of it by the Transvaal +Rulers. Then came the Pretoria Convention only two years +ago which added a large block of native land to the Transvaal. +That was not enough. Freebooters came over, mostly from the +Transvaal, and afterwards from other parts of the country. +Representations and remonstrances were made to the Transvaal +Government. There was a non possumus reply. 'We cannot +stop them;' We seem to have good ground for believing that +the freebooters were stimulated by the officers of the Transvaal +Government. The result was that the native Chiefs of the +people lost by far the larger portion of their land. They appealed +to our Government, and we did nothing; there came again and +again despairing appeals to England, and how were they met? +I can only believe it was through ignorance of the question that +it was possible to meet them as we did. It was proposed to meet +them by a miserable compensation in money or in land, not to +the people but to the few Chiefs, who to their credit, as a lesson +to us, a great Christian Country said: 'We will not desert our +people even if you desert us.' Then there followed utter disorder +and disorganisation in Bechuanaland. Then came in the Transvaal +Government and virtually said: 'Give us the country and we +will maintain order; if owners of the land object we will put them +down as rebels; we will take their land as we have taken +Mapoch's, and apprentice their children. You have got tired of +these quarrels, leave them to us; we will put a stop to them by +protecting the robbers who have taken the land.'</p> + +<p>"That practically is the demand. Are you prepared to +grant it? I for my part say, that rather than grant it I would +(a voice in the meeting—'fight!') yes, if necessary, fight; but I +will do my utmost to persuade my fellow countrymen to make +the declaration that, if necessary, force will be used, which, if it +was believed in, would make it unnecessary to fight.</p> + +<p>"The Transvaal Boers know our power, and the Delegates +know our power. It is our will that they doubt. If I could not +persuade my fellow countrymen that they meant to show that +they would never grant such demands as these, I would rather +do—what I should otherwise oppose with all my might,—withdraw +from South Africa altogether. I am not so proud of our +extended Empire as to wish to preserve it at the cost of England +refusing to discharge her duties. If we have obligations we must +meet them, and if we have duties we must fulfil them; and I have +confidence in the English people that first or last they will make +our Government fulfil its obligations. But there is much difference +between first and last; last is much more difficult than first, and +more costly than first. The cost increases with more than +geometrical progression. There are people who say, (but the +British nation will not say it;) 'leave us alone, let these Colonists +and Boers and Natives whom we are tired of, fight it out as best they +can; let us declare by our deeds, or rather by our non deeds that +we will not keep our promise nor fulfil our duty.' Such a course +as that would be as extravagantly costly as it would be shamefully +wrong. This <i>laissez faire</i> policy tends to make things go +from bad to worse until at last by a great and most costly effort, +and perhaps by a really bloody and destructive war, we shall be +obliged to do in the end at a greater cost, and in a worse way, +that which we could do now. It is not impossible to do it now. +A gentleman in the meeting said it was a question of fighting. +I do not believe this; but though born a Quaker, I must admit +that if there be no other way by which we can protect our allies +and prevent the ungrateful desertion of those who helped us in +the time of need, than by the exercise of force, I say force must +be exercised."</p> + +<p>Readers will remark how extraordinarily prophetic are these +words of Mr. Forster, spoken in 1883.</p> + +<p>The "venerable and beloved Lord Shaftesbury," as Mr. +Mackenzie calls him, spoke as follows:—</p> + +<p>"This morning has been put into my hands the reply of the +Transvaal delegates to the Aborigines Protection Society. I +read it with a certain amount of astonishment and of comfort +too,—of astonishment that men should be found possessing such +a depth of Christianity, such sentiments of religion, such love for +veracity, and such regard for the human race as to put on record +and to sign with their own hands such a denial of the atrocities +and cruelties which have been recorded against them for so many +years. It is most blessed to contemplate the depth of their +religious sentiments; they express the love they bear to our +Lord and Saviour, and their desire to walk in His steps. All +this is very beautiful, and, <i>if true</i>, is the greatest comfort ever +given us concerning the native races. I will take that document +as a promise for the future that they will act upon these principles, +that they are Christians, and that they will act on Christian +principles, and respect the rights of the natives. That is perhaps +the most generous view to take of the matter; but, nevertheless, +we shall be inclined to doubt until we <i>see</i> that they have put these +principles into practice.</p> + +<p>"Let me come to the laws of the Transvaal. It is a fundamental +law of that State that there can be no equality either in +Church or in State between white and coloured men. No native +is allowed to hold land in the Transvaal with such a fundamental +law. It is nothing more than a necessary transition to the +conclusion that the coloured people should be contemned as +being of an inferior order, and only fit for slavery. That is a +necessary transition, and it is for Englishmen to protest against +it, and to say that all men, of whatever creed, or race, or colour, +are equal in Church and State, and in the sight of God, and to +assert the principle of Civil and Religious Liberty whenever they +have the opportunity. I have my fears at times of the consequences +of democratic action; but I shall never feel afraid of +appealing to the British democracy on a question of Civil and +Religious liberty. That strikes a chord that is very deep and +dear to every Briton everywhere. They believe,—and their +history shows that they act upon the belief,—that the greatest +blessing here below that can be given to intellectual and moral +beings is the gift of Civil and Religious liberty. Sensible of the +responsibility we have assumed, we appeal to the British public, +and I have no doubt what the answer will be. It will be that by +God's blessing, and so far as in us lies, Civil and Religious +liberty <i>shall</i> prevail among all the tribes of South Africa, to the +end that they may become civilized nations, vying with us in the +exercise of the gifts that God has bestowed upon us."</p> + +<p>Sir Henry Barkly, who had held the office of Governor +of the Cape Colony, and of High Commissioner for a number +of years, said:—</p> + +<p>"Apart from other considerations, it is essential in the +interests of civilization and of commerce that the route to the +interior of the Dark Continent should be kept in our hands. It +has been through the stations planted by our missionaries all +along it, as far as Matabeleland, that the influence of the Gospel +has been spread among the natives, and that the way has been +made safe and easy for the traveller and the trader. Can we +suppose that these stations can be maintained if we suffer the +road to fall within the limits of the Transvaal? We need not +recall our melancholy experience of the past in this region. I +would rather refer to the case of the Paris Evangelical Society, +whose missionaries were refused leave only a short time ago to +teach or preach to the Basuto-speaking population within the +Transvaal territory."</p> + +<p>The Hon. K. Southey said:—</p> + +<p>"I concur entirely with what has been said by the Right +Hon. Mr. Forster with regard to slavery. It must be admitted +that the institution does not exist in name; but in reality something +very closely allied to it exists, for in that country there is +no freedom for the coloured races. The road to the interior must +be kept open, not only for the purposes of trade, but also as a +way by which the Gospel may be carried from here to the vast +regions beyond Her Majesty's possessions in that part of the +world. If we allow the Transvaal State to annex a territory +through which the roads to the interior pass, not only will there +be difficulties put in the way of our traders, but the missionary +also will find it no easy task to obey the injunction to carry the +Gospel into all lands, and to preach it to all peoples."</p> + +<p>Sir Fowell Buxton presented the following thought, which +might with advantage be taken to heart at the present time:—</p> + +<p>"We know how in the United States they have lately been +celebrating the events that recall the time a century ago of the +declaration of their independence. I will ask you to consider +what would have been the best advice that we could have given +at that time to the Government at Washington? Do we not +know that in regard to all that relates to the well-being of the +country, to mere matters of wealth and property, the best advice +to have given them would have been, to deliver their country at +once from all connection with slavery in the days when they +formed her constitution."</p> + +<hr style='width: 45%;' /> + +<p>Sir William M'Arthur, M.P., said:—</p> + +<p>"I have never seen in the Mansion House a larger or more +enthusiastic meeting, and I believe that the feeling which +animates this meeting is animating the whole country. Any +course of action taken by Her Majesty's Ministers towards the +Transvaal will be very closely watched. I myself am for peace, +but I am also for that which maintains peace, viz., a firm and +decided policy."</p> + +<hr style='width: 45%;' /> + +<p>The poor Chief, Mankoroane, having heard that the Transvaal +Delegates would discuss questions of vital importance to his +people, left Bechuanaland and went as far as Cape Town on his +way to England to represent his case there. Lord Derby, however, +sent him word that he could not be admitted to the +Conference in London, where the ownership of his own country +was to be discussed. Mankoroane then begged Mr. Mackenzie +to be his representative, but was again told that neither personally +nor by representative could he be recognised at the Conference +in Downing Street, but that any remarks which Mr. Mackenzie +might make on his behalf would receive the attention of Government. +(Blue Book 3841, 92.)</p> + +<p>The first and great question which the Transvaal Delegates +desired to settle in their own interests was that of the Western +boundary line, amended by themselves, which was represented +on a map. They were informed that their amended treaty was +"neither in form nor in substance such as Her Majesty's +Government could adopt," there being "certain Chiefs who had +objected, on behalf of their people, to be included in the Transvaal, +and there being a strong feeling in London in favour of the +independence of these natives, or (if they, the natives, desired it) +of their coming under British rule." There was now brought +before the delegates a map showing the addition of land which +was eventually granted to the Transvaal, but the delegates would +not agree to any such arrangement. Her Majesty's Government +were giving away to them some 2,600 square miles of native territory, +concerning which there was no clear evidence that its owners +wished to be joined to the Transvaal. But this was nothing to +the Transvaal demand, as shown by a map which they put in, +and which included an <i>additional</i> block of 4,000 square miles. +Not finding agreement with the Government possible, the +delegates then turned from that position, and took up the +question of the remission of the debt which the Transvaal owed +to England, saying that the wishes of the native chiefs should be +consulted first about the boundary line. This was a bold stroke; +they were professing to be representing the interests of certain +chiefs, which was not the case.</p> + +<p>Lord Derby telegraphed to the Cape on the 27th of Feb. +1884, the result of the protracted labours of the Conference at +Downing Street, mentioning:—"British Protectorate established +outside the Transvaal, with Delegates' consent. Debt reduced +to quarter of a million."<a name="FNanchor_17_17" href="#Footnote_17_17">[17]</a> To many persons it seems that the +Convention of 1884, rather than the Convention of 1881, was the +real blunder. It is remarkable, however, as illustrating the small +attention which South African affairs then received, that no party +controversy was aroused over this later instrument. Very soon +afterwards, however, the question became acute, owing to the +action of Mr. Kruger; and then, it must be remembered, that Mr. +Gladstone did not hesitate to appeal to the armed strength of the +Empire in order to defend British interests and prevent the +extension of Boer rule. That there was not war in 1884 was due +only to the fact that Mr. Kruger at that time did not choose to +fight. The raiders and filibusters were put down before by Sir +Charles Warren's force, but Mr. Gladstone had taken every precaution +in view of the contingency of a collision.</p> + +<p>The conditions laid down in the Convention did not satisfy +the Delegates, although they formally assented to them. Their +disappointment began to be strongly manifested. They had stoutly +denied that slavery existed in their country. This denial was +challenged by the Secretary of the Aborigines Protection Society, +who brought forward some very awkward testimonies and facts +of recent date. It was suggested that President Kruger should +for ever silence the calumniators by demanding a Commission of +enquiry on this subject which would take evidence within and +round the Transvaal as they might see fit. The Delegates took +good care not to accept this challenge. The firmness of the +British Government at that moment was fully justified by the +actual facts of the case which came so strikingly before them, +and their attitude was supported by public opinion, so far as +this public opinion in England then existed. It was the Transvaal +deputation itself which had most effectually developed it +when they first arrived in London, though it was known they had +many friends, and that numbers of the public were generally quite +willing to consider their claims.<a name="FNanchor_18_18" href="#Footnote_18_18">[18]</a> They sat for three months in +conference with members of Her Majesty's Government before +coming to any decision. That decision was known as the +London Convention of 1884.</p> + +<p>The displeasure of the Boer Delegates matured after their +return to the Transvaal, and was expressed in a message sent by +the Volksraad to our Government not many months after the +signing of the Convention in London.</p> + +<p>In this document the Boers seem to regard themselves as a +victorious people making terms with those they had conquered. +It is interesting to note the articles of the Convention to which +they particularly object. In the telegram which was sent to +"His Excellency, W.E. Gladstone," the Volksraad stated that +the London Convention was not acceptable to them. They +declared that "modifications were desirable, and that certain +articles <i>must</i> be altered." They attached importance to the +Native question, declaring that "the Suzerain (Great Britain) +has not the right to interfere with their Legislature, and that +they cannot agree to article 3, which gives the Suzerain a voice +concerning Native affairs, nor to article 13, by virtue of which +Natives are to be allowed to acquire land, nor to that part of +Article 26, by which it is provided that white men of a foreign +race living in the Transvaal shall not be taxed in excess of the +taxes imposed on Transvaal citizens."</p> + +<p>It should be observed here that this reference to unequal and +excessive taxation of foreigners in the Transvaal, pointing to a +tendency on the part of the Boers to load foreigners with unjust +taxation, was made before the development of the goldfields and +the great influx of Uitlanders.</p> + +<p>The Message of the Volksraad was finally summed up in the +following words: "we object to the following articles, 15, 16, 26, +and 27, because to insist on them is hurtful to our sense of +honour." (sic.)</p> + +<p>Now what are the articles to which the Boer Government +here objects, and has continued to object?</p> + +<p>Article 15 enacts that <i>no slavery or apprenticeship shall be +tolerated</i>.</p> + +<p>Article 16 provides for religious toleration (for Natives and all alike.)</p> + +<p>Article 26 provides for the free movement, trading, and +residence of all persons, other than natives, conforming themselves +to the laws of the Transvaal.</p> + +<p>Article 27 gives to all, (Natives included,) the right of free +access to the Courts of Justice.</p> + +<p>Putting the "sense of honour" of the Transvaal Volksraad +out of the question, past experience had but too plainly proved +that these Articles were by no means superfluous.</p> + +<p>FOOTNOTES:</p> + +<p><a name="Footnote_16_16" href="#FNanchor_16_16">[16]</a> "Austral Africa, Ruling it or Losing it," p. 157.</p> + +<p><a name="Footnote_17_17" href="#FNanchor_17_17">[17]</a> When the Transvaal was annexed, in 1877, the public debt of +that country amounted to £301,727. "Under British rule this debt was +liquidated to the extent of £150,000, but the total was brought up by a +Parliamentary grant, a loan from the Standard Bank, and sundries to +£390,404, which represented the public debt of the Transvaal on the 31st +December, 1880. This was further increased by monies advanced by the +Standard Bank and English Exchequer during the war, and till the 8th +August, 1881, (during which time the country yielded no revenue,) to +£457,393. To this must be added an estimated sum of £200,000 for +compensation charges, pension allowances, &c., and a further sum of +£383,000, the cost of the successful expedition against Secocoemi, that +of the unsuccessful one being left out of account, bringing up the total +public debt to over a million, of which about £800,000 was owing to this +country. This sum the Commissioners (Sir Evelyn Wood dissenting) reduced +by a stroke of the pen to £265,000, thus entirely remitting an +approximate sum of £500,000 or £600,000. To the sum of £265,000 still +owing must be added say another £150,000 for sums lately advanced to pay +the compensation claims, bringing up the actual amount owing to England +to about a quarter of a million."—Report of Assistant Secretary to the +British Agent for Native Affairs. (Blue Book 3917, 46.)</p> + +<p><a name="Footnote_18_18" href="#FNanchor_18_18">[18]</a> "Austral Africa." Mackenzie.</p> + + + +<hr style="width: 65%;" /> +<h2><a name="VI"></a>VI.</h2> + +<blockquote><p>THE CAREER AND RECALL OF SIR BARTLE FRERE. UNFORTUNATE +EFFECT IN SOUTH AFRICA OF PARTY SPIRIT IN POLITICS AT +HOME. DEATH OF SIR BARTLE FRERE. THE GREAT PRINCIPLES +OF BRITISH GOVERNMENT AND LAW. HOPE FOR SOUTH +AFRICA IF THESE ARE MAINTAINED AND OBSERVED. WORDS OF +MR. GLADSTONE ON THE COLONIZING SPIRIT OF ENGLISHMEN.</p></blockquote> + +<p>The case of Sir Bartle Frere illustrates forcibly the +inexpediency of allowing our party differences at home to sow +the seeds of discord in a distant Colony, and the apparent +injustices to which such action may give rise.</p> + +<p>While in England Sir Bartle Frere was being censured and +vilified, in South Africa an overwhelming majority of the +colonists, of whatever race or origin, were declaring, in +unmistakable terms, that he had gained their warmest approbation +and admiration. Town after town and village after village +poured in addresses and resolutions in different forms, agreeing +in enthusiastic commendation of him as the one man who had +grasped the many threads of the South African tangle, and was +handling them so as to promise a solution in accordance with +the interests of all the many and various races which inhabited it.</p> + +<p>"In our opinion," one of these resolutions (from Cradock) +says, "his Excellency, Sir Bartle Frere, is one of the best +Governors, if not the best Governor, this Colony has ever had, +and the disasters which have taken place since he has held +office, are not due to any fault of his, but to a shameful mismanagement +of public affairs before he came to the Colony, and the state +of chaos and utter confusion in which he had the misfortune to +find everything on his arrival; and we are therefore of opinion +that the thanks of every loyal colonist are due to his Excellency +for the herculean efforts he has since made under the most trying +circumstances to South Africa...."<a name="FNanchor_19_19" href="#Footnote_19_19">[19]</a></p> + +<p>Another, from Kimberley says:—"It has been a source of +much pain to us that your Excellency's policy and proceedings +should have been so misunderstood and misrepresented.... The +time, we hope, is not far distant when the wisdom of your +Excellency's native policy and action will be as fully recognized +and appreciated by the whole British nation as it is by the +colonists of South Africa."<a name="FNanchor_20_20" href="#Footnote_20_20">[20]</a></p> + +<p>At Pretoria, the capital of the Transvaal, a public meeting +was held (April 24th), which resolved that:—</p> + +<p>"This meeting reprobates most strongly the action of a +certain section of the English and Colonial Press for censuring, +without sufficient knowledge of local affairs, the policy and +conduct of Sir B. Frere; and it desires not only to express its +sympathy with Sir B. Frere and its confidence in his policy, but +also to go so far as to congratulate most heartily Her Majesty +the Queen, the Home Government, and ourselves, on possessing +such a true, considerate, and faithful servant as his Excellency +the High Commissioner."</p> + +<p>A public dinner also was given to Sir B. Frere at Pretoria, +at which his health was drunk with the greatest enthusiasm; +there was a public holiday, and other rejoicings.</p> + +<p>Sir Bartle Frere was intending to go to Bloemfontein, in the +Orange Free State, to visit President Brand, with whom he was on +cordial terms, and with whom he wished to talk over his plans for +the Transvaal; but instructions came from Sir Michael Hicks-Beach +to proceed to Cape Town. He therefore left Pretoria on +May 1st. He was welcomed everywhere with the utmost cordiality +and enthusiasm. At Potchefstroom there was a public dinner and +a reception. On approaching Bloemhof he was met by a large +cavalcade, and escorted into the township, where a triumphal +arch had been erected, and an address was presented.</p> + +<p>"At Kimberley he had been sworn in as Governor of Griqualand +West. Fifteen thousand people, it was estimated, turned out to +meet and welcome him. From thence to Cape Town his journey +was like a triumphal progress, the population at each place he +passed through receiving him in flag-decorated streets, with escorts, +triumphal arches, illuminations, and addresses. At Worcester, +where he reached the railway, there was a banquet, at which Sir +Gordon Sprigg was also present. At Paarl, which was the head-quarters +of the Dutch Afrikander league, and where some of the +most influential Dutch families live, a similar reception was given +him. Finally, at Cape Town, where, if anywhere, his policy was +likely to find opponents among those who regarded it from a +provincial point of view, the inhabitants of all classes and sections +and of whatever origin, gave themselves up to according him a +reception such as had never been surpassed in Capetown.</p> + +<p>"In England, complimentary local receptions and addresses +to men in high office or of exalted rank do not ordinarily carry +much meaning. Party tactics and organization account for a +proportion of such manifestations. But the demonstration on +this occasion cannot be so explained. There was no party +organization to stimulate it. It was too general to confer +notoriety on any of its promoters, and Sir B. Frere had not +personally the power, even if he had had the will, to return +compliments. And what made it the more remarkable was that +there was no special victory or success or event of any kind to +celebrate."<a name="FNanchor_21_21" href="#Footnote_21_21">[21]</a></p> + +<p>On reaching Cape Town, a telegraphic message was handed +to him, preparing him for his recall, by the statement that Sir H. +Bulwer was to replace him as High Commissioner of the Transvaal, +Natal, and all the adjoining eastern portion of South Africa, and +that he was to confine his attention for the present to the Cape +Colony.</p> + +<p>To deprive him of his authority as regarded Natal, Zululand, +the Transvaal—the Transvaal, which almost by his single hand +and voice he had just saved from civil war—and expressly to +direct Colonel Lanyon to cease to correspond with him, was +to discredit a public servant before all the world at the crisis of +his work.</p> + +<p>Sir Bartle Frere's great object had been to bring about a +Confederation of all the different States and portions of South +Africa, an object with which the Home Government was in +sympathy.</p> + +<p>What was wanting to bring about confederation was confidence, +founded on the permanent pacification and settlement of +Zululand, the Transvaal, the Transkei, Pondoland, Basutoland, +West Griqualand, and the border generally. How could +there, under these circumstances, be confidence any longer? +There was no doubt what he had meant to do. By many a +weary journey he had made himself personally known throughout +South Africa. His aims and intentions were never concealed, +never changed. In confederating under his superintendence all +men knew what they were doing. But he was now to be superseded. +Was his policy to be changed, and how?<a name="FNanchor_22_22" href="#Footnote_22_22">[22]</a></p> + +<p>It was expected by the political majority in England that as +soon as Mr. Gladstone came into power, Sir Bartle Frere, whose +policy had been so strongly denounced, would be at once recalled. +When the new Parliament met in May, the Government found +many of their supporters greatly dissatisfied that this had not been +done. Notice of motion was given of an address to the Crown, +praying for Sir B. Frere's removal. Certain members of +parliament met together several times at the end of May, and a +memorial to Mr. Gladstone was drawn up, which was signed by +about ninety of them, and sent to him on June 3rd, to the following +effect:—</p> + +<p>"To the Right Hon. W.E. Gladstone, M.P., First Lord of +the Treasury."</p> + +<p>"We the undersigned, members of the Liberal party, +respectfully submit that as there is a strong feeling throughout +the country in favour of the recall of Sir Bartle Frere, it would +greatly conduce to <i>the unity of the party and relieve many members +from the charge of breaking their pledges to their constituents if</i> +that step were taken."<a name="FNanchor_23_23" href="#Footnote_23_23">[23]</a></p> + +<p>The first three signatures to this document were those of +L.L. Dillwyn, Wilfrid Lawson, and Leonard Courtney.</p> + +<p>This has been called not unjustly, "a cynically candid +document." The "unity of the Party," and "pledges to +constituents" are the only considerations alluded to in favour of +the recall of a man to whose worth almost the whole of South +Africa had witnessed, in spite of divided opinions concerning +the Zulu War, for which he was only in a very minor degree +responsible.</p> + +<p>The Memorial to the Government had its effect; the successor +of Sir Bartle Frere was to be Sir Hercules Robinson. He was +in New Zealand, and could not reach the Cape at once; therefore +Sir George Strahan was appointed <i>ad interim</i> governor, Sir Bartle +being directed not even to await the arrival of the latter, but to +leave by the earliest mail steamer.</p> + +<p>At the news of his recall there arose for the second time a +burst of sympathy from every town, village, and farm throughout +the country, in terms of mingled indignation and sorrow.<a name="FNanchor_24_24" href="#Footnote_24_24">[24]</a> The +addresses and resolutions, being spontaneous at each place, varied +much, and laid stress on different points, but in all there was a +tone of deep regret, of conviction that Sir B. Frere's policy and +his actions had been wise, just, and merciful towards all men, and +of hope that the British Government and people would in time +learn the truth.<a name="FNanchor_25_25" href="#Footnote_25_25">[25]</a></p> + +<p>One from farmers of East London concludes: "May God +Almighty bless you and grant you and yours a safe passage to +the Mother Country, give you grace before our Sovereign Lady +the Queen, and eloquence to vindicate your righteous cause +before the British nation."<a name="FNanchor_26_26" href="#Footnote_26_26">[26]</a></p> + +<p>The address of the Natives of Mount Cake is pathetic in its +simplicity of language.</p> + +<p>"Our hearts are very bitter this day. We hear that the +Queen calls you to England. We have not heard that you are +sick; then why have you to leave us? By you we have now +peace. We sleep now without fear. Old men tell us of a good +Governor Durban (Sir Benjamin Durban) who had to leave +before his good works became law; but red coals were under the +ashes which he left. Words of wicked men, when he left, like +the wind blew up the fire, and the country was again in war. So +also Sir George Grey, a good Governor, good to tie up the hands +of bad men, good to plant schools, good to feed the hungry, good +to have mercy and feed the heathen when dying from hunger, +He also had to leave us. We do not understand this. But +your Excellency is not to leave us. Natal has now peace by +you; we have peace by you because God and the Queen sent +you. Do not leave us. Surely it is not the way of the Queen +to leave her children here unprotected until peace is everywhere. +We shall ever pray for you as well as for the Queen. These are +our words to our good Governor, though he turns his back on us."</p> + +<p>The Malays and other Orientals, of whom there is a considerable +population at Capetown, looked upon Frere, a former Indian +Statesman, as their special property. The address from the +Mahommedan subjects of the Queen says:—</p> + +<p>"We regret that our gracious Queen has seen fit to recall +your Excellency. We cannot help thinking it is through a +mistake. The white subjects of Her Majesty have had good +friends and good rulers in former Governors, but your Excellency +has been the friend of white and coloured alike."<a name="FNanchor_27_27" href="#Footnote_27_27">[27]</a></p> + +<hr style='width: 45%;' /> + +<p>The following letter is from Sir John Akerman, a member +of the Legislative Council of Natal:—</p> + +<p class='right'>"August 9th, 1880.</p> + +<p>"Having become aware of your recall to England from the +office of Governor of the Cape of Good Hope, etc., etc., I cannot +allow your departure to take place without conveying to you, +which I hereby do, the profound sense I have of the faithful and +conscientious manner in which you have endeavoured to fulfil +those engagements which, at the solicitation of Great Britain, you +entered upon in 1877. The policy was not your own, but was +thrust upon you. Having given in London, in 1876, advice to +pursue a different course in South Africa from the one then all +the fashion and ultimately confided to yourself, it affords me the +greatest pleasure to testify to the consistency of the efforts put +forth by you to carry out the (then) plan of those who commissioned +you, and availed themselves of your acknowledged skill +and experience. As a public man of long standing in South +Africa, I would likewise add that since the days of Sir G. Grey, +no Governor but yourself has grasped the <i>native question here +at all</i>, and I feel confident that had your full authority been +retained, and not harshly wrested from you, even at the eleventh hour +initiatory steps of a reformatory nature with respect to the natives +would have been taken, which it is the duty of Britain to follow while +she holds her sovereignty over these parts."</p> + +<p>Sir Gordon Sprigg wrote:—</p> + +<p class='right'>"August 29th, 1880.</p> + +<p>"I don't feel able yet to give expression to my sentiments of +profound regret that Her Majesty's Government have thought it +advisable to recall you from the post which you have held +with such conspicuous advantage to South Africa. They have +driven from South Africa 'the best friend it has ever known.' +For myself I may say that in the midst of all the difficulties with +which I have been surrounded, I have always been encouraged +and strengthened by the cheerful view you have taken of public +affairs, and that I have never had half-an-hour's conversation +with your Excellency without feeling a better, and, I believe, a +wiser man."</p> + +<p>Madame Koopmans de Wet, a lady of an old family, Dutch +of the Dutch, wrote to him, Nov. 16th, 1880:—</p> + +<p>"It is with feelings of the deepest sorrow that I take the +liberty of addressing these lines to you.... What is to be the +end of all this now? for now, particularly, do the Cape people +miss <i>their</i> Governor, for now superior qualities in everything are +wanted. Dear Sir Bartle, you know the material we have; it is +good, but who is to guide? It is plain to every thinking mind +that our position is becoming more critical every day....</p> + +<p>"But with deep sorrow let me say, England's, or rather +Downing Street's treatment, has not tightened the bonds between +the mother country and us. You know we have a large circle of +acquaintances, and I cannot say how taken aback I sometimes +am to hear their words. See, in all former wars there was a +moral support in the thought that England, our England, was +watching over us. Now there is but one cry, 'We shall have no +Imperial help.' Why is this? We have lost confidence in a +Government who could play with our welfare; and among the +many injuries done us, the greatest was to remove from among +us a ruler such as your Excellency was."</p> + +<p>"As the day drew near, the Cape Town people were perplexed +how to express adequately their feelings on the occasion. It was +suggested that on the day he was to embark, the whole city +should mourn with shops closed, flags half-mast high, and in +profound silence. But more cheerful counsels prevailed.</p> + +<p>"He was to leave by the <i>Pretoria</i> on the afternoon of Sept. +15th. Special trains had brought in contingents from the country. +The open space in front of Government House, Plein Street, +Church Square, Adderley Street, the Dock Road, the front of +the railway station, the wharves, the housetops, and every +available place, whence a view of the procession could be procured, +was closely packed. The Governor's carriage left +Government House at half-past four,—Volunteer Cavalry +furnishing the escort, and Volunteer Rifles, Engineers, and +Cadets falling in behind,—and amid farewell words and ringing +cheers, moved slowly along the streets gay with flags and decorations. +At the dock gates the horses were taken out and men +drew the carriage to the quay, where the <i>Pretoria</i> lay alongside. +Here the General, the Ministers, and other leading people, were +assembled; and the 91st Regiment, which had been drawn up, +presented arms, the Band played "God save the Queen," and +the Volunteer Artillery fired a salute as the Governor for the last +time stepped off African soil.</p> + +<p>"There had been some delay at starting, the tide was ebbing +fast, the vessel had been detained to the last safe moment, and +she now moved out slowly, and with caution, past a wharf which +the Malays, conspicuous in their bright-coloured clothing, had +occupied, then, with a flotilla of boats rowing alongside, between +a double line of yachts, steam-tugs and boats, dressed out with +flags, and dipping their ensigns as she passed, and lastly, under +the stern of the <i>Boadicea</i> man-of-war, whose yards were manned, +and whose crew cheered. The guns of the castle fired the last +salute from the shore, which was answered by the guns of the +<i>Boadicea</i>; and in the still bright evening the smoke hung for a +brief space like a curtain, hiding the shores of the bay from the +vessel. A puff of air from the south-east cleared it away, and +showed once more in the sunset light the flat mass of Table +Mountain, the "Lion's Head" to its right, festooned with flags, +the mountain slopes dotted over with groups thickening to a +continuous broad black line of people, extending along the water's +edge from the central jetty to the breakwater basin. The vessel's +speed increased, the light faded, and the night fell on the last, +the most glorious, and yet the saddest day of Sir Bartle Frere's +forty-five years' service of his Queen and country.</p> + +<p>"For intensity of feeling and unanimity it would be hard in +our time to find a parallel to this demonstration of enthusiasm +for a public servant. The Cape Town people are by race and +habit the reverse of demonstrative; yet it was noticed that day, +as it had been noticed when Frere left Sattara (India) thirty +years before, and again when he left Sind twenty-one years +before—a sight almost unknown amongst men of English or +German race in our day—that <i>men</i> looking on were unable to +restrain their tears. At Sattara and in Sind the regret at losing +him was softened by the knowledge that his departure was due +to a recognition of his merit; that he was being promoted in a +service in which his influence might some day extend with +heightened power to the country he was leaving. It was far +otherwise when he left the Cape. On that occasion the regret of +the colonists was mingled with indignation, and embittered with +a sense of wrong."<a name="FNanchor_28_28" href="#Footnote_28_28">[28]</a></p> + +<p>The writer just quoted makes the following remarks:—</p> + +<p>"No one who has not associated with colonists in their +homes can rightly enter into the mixed feelings with which they +regard the mother country. As with a son who is gone forth +into the world, there is often on one side the conceit of youth and +impatience of restraint, shown in uncalled for acts of self-assertion +or in dogmatic speech; and on the other side a supercilious want +of sympathy with the changed surroundings, the pursuits and +the aspirations of the younger generation. It seems as if there +were no bond left between the two. But a day of trial comes; +parent or offspring is threatened by a stranger; and then it is +seen that the old instinct and yearnings are not dead, but only +latent. The mother country had hitherto not been forgetful of +its natural obligations to its South African offspring."</p> + +<p>"But those" he goes on to say, "who on that fateful evening +watched the hull of the <i>Pretoria</i> slowly dipping below the western +horizon felt that if, as seemed only too probable, dismemberment +of the British Empire in South Africa were sooner or later to +follow, the fault did not lie with the colonists."</p> + +<p>The mother country had, he asserts, sacrificed the interests +of her loyal sons abroad to those which were at that moment +pre-occupying her at home, and appearing to her in such dimensions +as to blot out the larger view which later events gradually +forced upon her vision. The words above quoted are strong, +perhaps too strong, but if we are true lovers of our country and +race and of our fellow creatures everywhere, we shall not shrink +from any such warnings, though their wording may seem +exaggerated. For we have a debt to pay back to South Africa; +and if we cannot resume our solemn responsibilities towards her +and her millions of native peoples, in a chastened, a wiser and a more +determined spirit than that which for some time has prevailed, it +would be better to relinquish them altogether. But we are +beginning to understand the lesson written for our learning in this +solemn page of contemporary history which is to-day laid open +before our eyes and before those of the whole world.</p> + +<p>I have recorded some few of the many testimonies in +favour of Sir Bartle Frere, because he,—a man beloved and +respected by many of us,—was the subject of a hastily formed +judgment which continues in a measure even to this day, to +obscure the memory of his worth.</p> + +<p>A friend writes: "his letters are admirable as showing his +statesmanlike and humane view of things, and his courage and +patience under exasperating conditions. He returned to England +under a cloud, and died of a broken heart."</p> + +<p>Mr. Mackenzie, writing of his own departure from England +in 1884 to return to South Africa, says:—</p> + +<p>"The farewell which affected me most was that of Sir +Bartle Frere, who was then stretched on what turned out to be +his death-bed. He was very ill, and not seeing people, but +was so gratified that what he had proposed in 1878 as to +Bechuanaland should be carried out in 1884, that Lady Frere +asked me to call and see him before I sailed.</p> + +<p>"The countenance of this eminent officer was now thin, his +voice was weaker; but light was still in his eye and the mind +quite unclouded. 'Here I am, Mackenzie, between living and +dying, waiting the will of God.'</p> + +<p>'I expressed my hope for his recovery.'</p> + +<p>'We won't talk about me. I wanted to see you. I feel I +can give you advice, for I am an old servant of the Queen. I +have no fear of your success now on the side of Government. +Sir Hercules Robinson, having selected you, will uphold you +with a full support. The rest will depend on your own character +and firmness and tact. I am quite sure you will succeed. Your +difficulties will be at the beginning. But you will get them to +believe in you—the farmers as well as the natives. They will +soon see you are their friend. Now remember this: get good +men round you; get, if possible, godly men as your officers. +What has been done in India has been accomplished by hard-working, +loyal-hearted men, working willingly under chiefs to +whom they were attached. Get the right stamp of men round +you and the future is yours.'</p> + +<p>"This was the last kindly action and friendly advice of a +distinguished, noble-minded, and self-forgetful Christian man, +who had befriended me as an obscure person,—our meeting-ground +and common object being the future welfare of all races +in South Africa. I went forth to complete my life work: he +remained to die."</p> + +<p>It was a costly sacrifice made on the Altar of Party.</p> + +<p>My friends have sometimes asked me, what then is the +ground of my hope for the future of our country and all over +whom our Queen reigns? I reply,—my hope lies in the fact that +above all party differences, above all private and political +theories, above all the mere outward forms of Government and +the titles given to these, there stand, eternally firm and unchangeable, +the great principles of our Constitution which are the basis +of our Jurisprudence, and of every Law which is inherently +just. I use these words deliberately—"eternally firm and +unchangeable." A long and deep study of these principles, and +some experience of the grief and disaster caused by any grave +departure from them, have convinced me that these principles +are founded on the highest ethics,—the ethics of Christ.</p> + +<p>The great Charter of our Liberties was born, as all the most +precious things are, through "great tribulation," at a time when +our whole nation was groaning under injustice and oppression, +and when sorrow had purified the eyes of the noble "Seers" of +the time, and their appeal was to the God of Justice Himself, and +to no lower tribunal. These Seers were then endowed with the +power to bend the will of a stubborn and selfish monarch, and +to put on record the stern principles of our "Immortal Charter."</p> + +<p>I have often longed that every school-boy and girl should be +taught and well-grounded in these great principles. It would not +be a difficult nor a dry study, for like all great things, these +principles are simple, straight, and clear as the day. It is when, +we come to intricacies and technicalities of laws, even though +based on these great fundamental lines, that the study becomes +dry, useful to the professional lawyer, but not to the pupil in +school or the public generally.</p> + +<p>The principles of our Constitution have been many times in the +course of our national history disregarded, and sometimes openly +violated. But such disregard and such violation have happily +not been allowed to be of long duration. Sometimes the respect +of these principles has been restored by the efforts of a group of +enlightened Statesmen, but more frequently by the awakened +"Common Sense"<a name="FNanchor_29_29" href="#Footnote_29_29">[29]</a> of the people, who have become aware that +they, or even some very humble section of them, have been +made to suffer by such violation. Again and again the gallant +"Ship of our Constitution," carrying the precious cargo of our +inalienable rights and liberties, has righted herself in the midst +of storms and heavy seas of trouble. Having been called for +thirty years of my life to advocate the rights of a portion of our +people,—the meanest and most despised of our fellow citizens,—when +those rights had been destroyed by an Act of Parliament +which was a distinct violation of the Constitution, and having been +driven, almost like a ship-wrecked creature to cling, with the +helpless crew around me, during those years to this strong rock +of principle, and having found it to be political and social +salvation in a time of need, I cannot refrain, now in my old age, +from embracing every opportunity I may have of warning my +fellow countrymen of the danger there is in departing from these +principles.</p> + +<p>My hope for the future of South Africa, granting its continuance +as a portion of our Colonial Empire, is in the resurrection +of these great principles from this present tribulation, and their +recognition by our rulers, politicians, editors, writers, and people +at large as the expression of essential Justice and Morality.</p> + +<p>France possesses, equally with ourselves, a record of these +principles in its famous "Declaration of the Rights of Man," +born also in a period of great national tribulation. That document +is in principle identical with our own great Charter. But +France has only possessed it a little more than a century, whereas +our own Charter dates back many centuries; hence the character +of our people has been in a great measure formed upon its +principles, and they have been made sensitive to any grave or +continued violation of them. In France, earnest and sometimes +almost despairing appeals are now made to these fundamental +principles expressed in their own great Charter by a minority of +men who continue to see straight and clearly through the clouds +of contending factions in the midst of which they live; but for a +large portion of the nation they are a dead letter, even if they +have ever been intelligently understood.</p> + +<p>How far has South Africa been governed on these principles? +I boldly affirm that on the whole, since the beginning of the last +century, it is these principles of British Government and Law, +so far as they have been enforced, which have saved that colony +from anarchy and confusion, and its native populations from +bondage or annihilation. But they have not been sufficiently +strongly enforced. They have not been brought to bear upon +those Englishmen, traders, speculators, company-makers, and +others whose interests may have been in opposition to these +principles.</p> + +<p>A Swiss missionary who has lived a great part of his life in +South Africa, writes to me:—"The whole of South Africa is to +blame in its treatment of the natives. Take the British merchant, +the Boer and Dutch official, the German colonist, the French and +Swiss trader,—there is no difference. The general feeling among +these is against the coloured race being educated and evangelized.... Only +what can and must be said is this, that <i>the Laws of +the English Colonies are just</i>; those of the Boer States are the +negation of every right, civil and religious, which the black man +ought to have." I have similar testimonies from missionaries +(not Englishmen); but I regret to say that these good men +hesitate to have their names published,—not from selfish reasons,—but +from love of their missionary work and their native +converts, to whom they fear they will never be permitted to return +if the ascendancy of the present Transvaal Government should +continue, and Mr. Kruger should learn that they have published +what they have seen in his country. It is to be hoped that +these witnesses will feel impelled before long to speak out. The +writer just quoted, says:—"I firmly believe that the native +question is at the bottom of all this trouble. The time is coming +when, cost what it will, we missionaries must speak out."</p> + +<p>In connection with this subject, I give here a quotation +from the "Daily News," March 21st, 1900. The article was +inspired by a thoughtful speech of Sir Edward Grey. The writer +asks the reason of the loss of the capacity in our Liberal party +to deal with Colonial matters; and replies: "It is to be +found, we think, in want of imagination and in want of faith. +There are many among us who have failed, from want of +imagination, to grasp that we have been living in an age of +expansion; or who, recognising the fact, have from want of faith +seen in it occasion only for lamentation and woe. Failure in +either of these respects is sure to deprive a British party of +popular support. For the 'expansion of England' now, as in +former times, proceeds from the people themselves, and faith in +the mission of England is firmly planted in the popular creed." +We recall a noble passage in which Mr. Gladstone stated with +great clearness the inevitable tendency of the times in which we +live. "There is," he said, "a continual tendency on the part of +enterprising people to overstep the limits of the Empire, and not +only to carry its trade there, but to form settlements in other +countries beyond the sphere of a regularly organized Government, +and there to constitute a civil Government of their own. Let the +Government adopt, with mathematical rigour if you like, an +opposition to annexation, and what does it effect? It does +nothing to check that tendency—that perhaps irresistible +tendency—of British enterprise to carry your commerce, and +to carry the range and area of your settlement beyond the +limits of your sovereignty.... There the thing is, and you +cannot repress it. Wherever your subjects go, if they are in +pursuit of objects not unlawful, you must afford them all the +protection which your power enables you to give." "There the +thing is." (But many Liberals have lacked the imagination to see +it.) And being there, it affords a great opportunity; for "to this +great Empire is committed (continued Mr. Gladstone) a trust +and a function given from Providence as special and as remarkable +as ever was entrusted to any portion of the family of man." +But not all Liberals share Mr. Gladstone's faith. They thus cut +themselves off from one of the chief tendencies and some of the +noblest ideals of the time. Liberalism must broaden its outlook, +and seek to promote "the large and efficient development of the +British Commonwealth on liberal lines, both within and outside +these islands."</p> + +<p>FOOTNOTES:</p> + +<p><a name="Footnote_19_19" href="#FNanchor_19_19">[19]</a> Blue Book, C. p. 28, 2673.</p> + +<p><a name="Footnote_20_20" href="#FNanchor_20_20">[20]</a> Blue Book, C. 2454, p. 57.</p> + +<p><a name="Footnote_21_21" href="#FNanchor_21_21">[21]</a> Life and Correspondence of Sir Bartle Frere, by +J. Martineau.</p> + +<p><a name="Footnote_22_22" href="#FNanchor_22_22">[22]</a> Life and Correspondence of Sir Bartle Frere, by +J. Martineau.</p> + +<p><a name="Footnote_23_23" href="#FNanchor_23_23">[23]</a> The italics are my own.</p> + +<p><a name="Footnote_24_24" href="#FNanchor_24_24">[24]</a> There are between sixty and seventy resolutions and +addresses recorded in the Blue-book, all passed unanimously except in +one case, at Stellenbosch where a minority opposed the resolution. The +spokesman of the minority, however, based his opposition not on Frere's +general policy, still less on his character, but as a protest against an +Excise Act, which was one of Mr. Spring's measures.</p> + +<p><a name="Footnote_25_25" href="#FNanchor_25_25">[25]</a> Life and Correspondence of Sir Bartle Frere.</p> + +<p><a name="Footnote_26_26" href="#FNanchor_26_26">[26]</a> Blue Book, C. 2740, p. 46.</p> + +<p><a name="Footnote_27_27" href="#FNanchor_27_27">[27]</a> Blue Book, C. 2740, p. 63.</p> + +<p><a name="Footnote_28_28" href="#FNanchor_28_28">[28]</a> Life and Correspondence of the Right Hon. Sir Bartle +Frere, by Martineau.</p> + +<p><a name="Footnote_29_29" href="#FNanchor_29_29">[29]</a> In the sense in which the great Lord Chatham used the words.</p> + + + +<hr style="width: 65%;" /> +<h2><a name="VII"></a>VII.</h2> + +<blockquote><p>TRANSVAAL POLICY SINCE 1884. DELIMITATION OF BOUNDARY +AGREED TO AND NOT OBSERVED. THE CHIEF MONTSIOA. HIS +COUNTRY PLACED UNDER BRITISH PROTECTION. TRANSVAAL +LAW. THE GRONDWET OR CONSTITUTION. THE HIGH +COURTS OF JUSTICE SUBSERVIENT TO THE VOLKSRAAD OR +PARLIAMENT. ARTICLE 9 OF THE GRONDWET REFERRING TO +NATIVES. NATIVE MARRIAGE LAWS. THE PASS SYSTEM. +MISPLACED GOVERNMENTAL TITLES,—REPUBLIC, EMPIRE, +ETC.</p></blockquote> + +<p>The Boer policy towards the natives did not undergo any +change for the better from 1881 and onwards.</p> + +<p>At the time of the rising of the Boers against the +British Protectorate, which culminated in the battle of Majuba +Hill and the retrocession of the Transvaal, a number of native +chiefs in districts outside the Transvaal boundary, sent to the +British Commissioner for native affairs to offer their aid to the +British Government, and many of them took the "loyals" of the +Transvaal under their protection. One of these was Montsioa, a +Christian chief of the Barolong tribe. He and other chiefs took +charge of Government property and cattle during the disturbances, +and one had four or five thousand pounds in gold, the product of +a recently collected tax, given him to take care of by the +Commissioner of his district, who was afraid that the money would +be seized by the Boers. <i>In, every instance the property entrusted to +their charge was returned intact</i>. The loyalty of all the native chiefs +under very trying circumstances, is a remarkable proof of the +great affection of the Kaffirs, and more especially those of the +Basuto tribes, who love peace better than war, for the Queen's +rule. I will cite one other instance among many of the gladness +with which different native races placed themselves under the +protection of the Queen.</p> + +<p>In May, 1884, in the discharge of his office as Deputy +Commissioner in Bechuanaland, and on behalf of Her Majesty, +the Queen, Mr. Mackenzie entered into a treaty with the chief, +Montsioa, by which his country (the Barolong's country) was +placed under British protection, and also with Moshette, a +neighbouring chief, who wrote a letter to Mr. Mackenzie asking +to be put under the same protection as the other Barolong.<a name="FNanchor_30_30" href="#Footnote_30_30">[30]</a></p> + +<p>Mr. Mackenzie wrote:<a name="FNanchor_31_31" href="#Footnote_31_31">[31]</a>—"Whatever may have been the +feelings of disapproval of the British Protectorate entertained by +the Transvaal people, I was left in no manner of doubt as to the +joy and thankfulness with which it was welcomed in the Barolong +country itself.</p> + +<p>"The signing of the treaty in the courtyard of Montsioa, at +Mafeking, by the chief and his headmen, was accompanied by +every sign of gladness and good feeling. The speech of the +venerable chief Montsioa was very cordial, and so cheerful in its +tone as to show that he hoped and believed that the country +would now get peace.</p> + +<p>"Using the formula for many years customary in proclamations +of marriages in churches in Bechuanaland, Montsioa, amid the +smiles of all present, announced an approaching political union, +and exclaimed with energy, "Let objectors now speak out or +henceforth for ever be silent." There was no objector.</p> + +<p>"I explained carefully in the language of the people, the nature +and object of the Protectorate, and the manner in which it was to +be supported.</p> + +<p>"Montsioa then demanded in loud tones: "Barolong! what is +your response to the words that you have heard?"</p> + +<p>"With one voice there came a great shout from one end of the +courtyard to the other, "We all want it."</p> + +<p>"The chief turned to me and said, "There! you have the answer +of the Barolong, we have no uncertain feelings here." As I was +unfolding the views of Her Majesty's Government that the +Protectorate should be self-supporting, the chief cried out, 'We +know all about it, Mackenzie, we consent to pay the tax.' I +could only reply to this by saying that that was just what I was +coming to; but, inasmuch as they knew all about it, and saw its +importance, I need say no more on the subject.</p> + +<p>"Montsioa, in the first instance, did not like the appearance +of Moshette's people in his town. I told him I was glad they had +come, and he must reserve his own feelings, and await the results +of what was taking place. I was pleased, therefore, when in the +public meeting in the courtyard, just before the signing of the +treaty, Montsioa turned to the messengers of Moshette and asked +them if they saw and heard nicely what was being done with the +Barolong country? They replied in the affirmative, and thus, +from a native point of view, became assenting parties. In this +manner something definite was done towards effacing an ancient +feud. The signing of the treaty then took place, the translation +of which is given in the Blue Book.</p> + +<p>"After the treaty had been signed, the old chief requested +that prayer might be offered up, which was accordingly done by a +native minister. The satisfaction of the great event was further +marked by the discharge of a volley from the rifles of a company +of young men told off for the purpose; and the old cannon of +Montsioa, mounted between the wheels of an ox-waggon, was also +brought into requisition to proclaim the general joy and satisfaction.</p> + +<p>"But alas! such feelings were destined to be of short duration. +While we were thus employed at Mafeking, the openly-declared +enemies of the Imperial Government, and of peace and order in +Bechuanaland, had been at their appropriate work elsewhere +within the Protectorate. Before sunset the same evening, I was +surprised to hear the Bechuana war cry sounded in Montsioa's +Town, and shortly afterwards I saw the old chief approaching +my waggon, followed by a large body of men.</p> + +<p>"'Monare Makence!' (Mr. Mackenzie), 'the cattle have +been lifted by the Boers,' was his first announcement. I shall +never forget the scene at that moment. The excitement of the +men, some of whom were reduced to poverty by what had +taken place, and also their curiosity as to what step I should +take, were plainly enough revealed on the faces of the crowd +who, with their chief, now stood before me.</p> + +<p>"'Mr. Mackenzie,' said Montsioa, 'you are master now, +you must say what is to be done. We shall be obedient to your +orders.' 'We have put our names on your paper, but the +Boers have our cattle all the same,' said one man.</p> + +<p>Another shouted out with vehemence, 'please don't tell us +to go on respecting the boundary line. Why should we do so +when the Boers don't?'</p> + +<p>'Who speaks about a boundary line?' said another speaker, +probably a heavy loser. 'Is it a thing that a man can eat? +Where are our cattle?'</p> + +<p>"As I have already said, I shall never forget the scene in +which these and similar speeches were made at my waggon as +the sun went down peacefully—the sun which had witnessed the +treaty-signing and the rejoicings at Mafeking. Its departing +rays now saw the cattle of the Barolong safe in the Transvaal, +and the Barolong owners and Her Majesty's Deputy Commissioner +looking at one another, at Mafeking."<a name="FNanchor_32_32" href="#Footnote_32_32">[32]</a></p> + +<p>Mr. Mackenzie then resolved what to do, and announced +that he would at once cross the boundary and go himself to the +nearest Transvaal town to demand redress. There was a hum +of approval, with a sharp enquiry from Montsioa,—did he really +mean to go himself? "Having no one to send, I must go myself," +Mackenzie replied. The old Chief, in a generous way, half +dissuaded him from the attempt. "The Boers cannot be trusted. +What shall I say if you do not return?" "All right, Montsioa," +replied Mackenzie, "say I went of my own accord. I will leave +my wife under your care."</p> + +<p>"Poor old fellow," writes Mackenzie, "brave-hearted, +though 'only a native,' he went away full of heaviness, promising +me his cart and harness, and an athletic herd as a driver, to start +early next morning."</p> + +<p>Mr. Mackenzie had little success in this expedition. He was +listened to with indifference when he represented to certain Landdrosts +and Field Cornets that he had not come to talk politics, +but to complain of a theft. Those to whom he spoke looked +upon the cattle raid not as robbery, but as "annexation" or +"commandeering." A man, listening to the palaver, exclaimed: +"Well, anyhow, we shall have cheap beef as long as Montsioa's +cattle last." At the hotel of the place Mr. Mackenzie met some +Europeans, who were farming or in business in the Transvaal. +They said to him: "Mr. Mackenzie, we are sorry to have to say +it to you, for we have all known you so long, but, honestly +speaking, we hope you won't succeed; the English Government +does not deserve to succeed after all that they have made us—loyal +colonists—suffer in the Transvaal. For a long time +scarcely a day has passed without our being insulted by the more +ignorant Boers, till we are almost tired of our lives, and yet we +cannot go away, having invested our all in the country."</p> + +<p>"Many such speeches were made to me," says Mackenzie, +"I give only one."</p> + +<p>I cannot find it in my heart to criticize the character of the +Boers at a time when they have held on so bravely in a desperate +war, and have suffered so much. There are Boers and Boers,—good +and bad among them,—as among all nations. We have +heard of kind and generous actions towards the British wounded +and prisoners, and we know that there are among them men +who, in times of peace, have been good and merciful to their +native servants. But it is not magnanimity nor brutality on the +part of individuals which are in dispute. Our controversy is +concerning the presence or absence of Justice among the Boers, +concerning the purity of their Government and the justice of +their Laws, or the reverse.</p> + +<p>I turn to their Laws, and in judging these, it is hardly +possible to be too severe. Law is a great teacher, a trainer, to a +great extent, of the character of the people. The Boers would +have been an exceptional people under the sun had they escaped +the deterioration which such Laws and such Government as they +have had the misfortune to live under inevitably produce.</p> + +<p>A pamphlet has lately been published containing a defence +of the Boer treatment of Missionaries and Natives, and setting +forth the efforts which have been made in recent years to +Christianize and civilize the native populations in their midst. +This paper is signed by nine clergymen of the Dutch Reformed +Church, and includes the name of the Rev. Andrew Murray, a +name respected and beloved by many in our own country. It is +welcome news that such good work has been undertaken, that +the President has himself encouraged it, and that a number of +Zulus or Kaffirs have recently been baptized in the Dutch +Reformed Church of the Transvaal. But the fact strikes one +painfully that in this pleading, (which has a pathetic note in it,) +these clergymen appear to have obliterated from their mind and +memory the whole past history, of their nation, and to have +forgotten that the harvest from seed sown through many generations +may spring up and bear its bitter fruit in their own day. +They do not seem to have accepted the verdict, or made the confession, +"we and our fathers have sinned." They seem rather to +argue, "our fathers may have sinned in these respects, but it +cannot be laid to our charge that we are continuing in their +steps."</p> + +<p>No late repentance will avail for the salvation of their +country unless Justice is now proclaimed and practised;—Justice +in Government and in the Laws.</p> + +<p>Their Grondwet, or Constitution, must be removed out of +its place for ever; their unequal laws, and the administrative +corruption which unequal laws inevitably foster, must be swept +away, and be replaced by a very different Constitution and very +different Laws. If this had been done during the two last +decades of Transvaal history, while untrammelled (as was +desired) by British interference, the sincerity of this recent +utterance would have deserved full credit, and would have been +recognized as the beginning of a radical reformation.</p> + +<p>The following is from the last Report of the Aborigines Protection +Society (Jan., 1900). Its present secretary leans towards a +favourable judgment of the recent improvements in the policy of +the Transvaal, and condemns severely every act on the part of the +English which does not accord with the principles of our Constitutional +Law, and therefore this statement will not be regarded +as the statement of a partisan: "It is laid down as a fundamental +principle in the Transvaal Grondwet that there is no +equality of rights between white men and blacks. In theory, if +not in practice, the Boers regard the natives, all of whom they +contemptuously call Kaffirs, whatever their tribal differences, +pretty much as the ancient Jews regarded the Philistines and +others whom they expelled from Palestine, or used as hewers of +wood and drawers of water, but with added prejudice due to the +difference of colour. So it was in the case of the early Dutch +settlers, and so it is to-day, with a few exceptions, due mainly to +the influence of the missionaries, whose work among the natives +has from the first been objected to and hindered. It is only by +social sufferance, and not by law, that the marriage of natives +with Christian rites is recognised, and it carries with it none of +the conditions as regards inheritance and the like, which are prescribed +by the Dutch Roman code in force with white men. As +a matter of fact, natives have no legal rights whatever. If they +are in the service of humane masters, mindful of their own +interests and moral obligations, they may be properly lodged and +fed, not overworked, and fairly recompensed; but from the +cruelties of a brutal master, perpetrated in cold blood or a +drunken fit, the native practically has no redress."</p> + +<p>The Rev. John H. Bovill, Rector of the Cathedral Church, +Lorenço Marquez, and sometime Her Majesty's Acting Consul +there, has worked for five years in a district from which numbers +of natives were drawn for work in the Transvaal, has visited +the Transvaal from time to time, and is well acquainted with +Boers of all classes and occupations. He has given us some details +of the working out—especially as regards the natives—of the +principles of the Grondwet or Constitution of the Transvaal.</p> + +<p>To us English, the most astonishing feature, to begin with, +of this Constitution, is that it places the power of the Judiciary +below that of the Raad or Legislative Body. The Judges of the +Highest Court of Law are not free to give judgment according to +evidence before them and the light given to them. A vote of the +Raad, consisting of a mere handful of men in secret sitting, can at +any time override and annul a sentence of the High Court.</p> + +<p>This will perhaps be better understood if we picture to +ourselves some great trial before Lord Russell and others of our +eminent judges, in which any laws bearing on the case were +carefully tested in connection with the principles of our Constitution; +that this supreme Court had pronounced its verdict, and that the +next day Parliament should discuss, with closed doors, the verdict +of the judges, and by a vote or resolution, should declare it unjust +and annul it.</p> + +<p>Let us imagine, to follow the matter a little further on the +lines of Transvaal justice, that our Sovereign had power to dismiss +at will from office any judge or judges who might have exercised +independence of judgment and pronounced a verdict displeasing +to Parliament or to herself personally! Such is law and justice +in the Transvaal; and that country is called a Republic! "This +is Transvaal justice," says M. Naville; "a mockery, an ingenious +legalizing of tyranny. There are no laws, there are only the +caprices of the Raad. A vote in a secret sitting, that is what +binds the Judges, and according to it they will administer justice. +The law of to-day will perhaps not be the law to-morrow. The +fifteen members of the majority, or rather President Kruger, who +influences their votes, may change their opinion from one day to +the next—it matters not; their opinion, formulated by a vote, will +always be law. Woe to the judge who should dare to mention +the Constitution or the Code, for there is one: he would at once +be dismissed by the President who appointed him."</p> + +<p>It was prescribed by the Grondwet that no new law should be +passed by Parliament (the Volksraad) unless notice of it had been +given three months in advance, and the people had had the +opportunity to pronounce upon it. This did not suit the President; +accordingly when desirous of legalizing some new project of his +own, he adopted the plan of bringing in such project as an addition +or amendment to some existing law, giving it out as <i>no new law</i>, +but only a supplementary clause. Law No. 1 of 1897 was +manipulated in this manner. By this law, the Judges of the +High Court were formally deprived of the right to test the validity +of any law in its relation to the Constitution, and they were +also compelled to accept as law, without question or reservation +of any kind, any resolution passed at any time and under any +circumstances by the Volksraad. This Law No. 1 of 1897 was +passed through all its stages in three days, without being subjected +in the first instance to the people.</p> + +<p>But I am especially concerned with what affects the natives.</p> + +<p>Article 1 of this section says:—A native must not own +fixed property.</p> + +<p>(2) He must not marry by civil or ecclesiastical process.</p> + +<p>(3) He must not be allowed access to Civil Courts in any +action against a white man.</p> + +<p>Article 9 of the Grondwet is not only adhered to, but is +exaggerated in its application as follows:—"The people shall not +permit any equality of coloured persons with white inhabitants, +neither in the Church, nor in the State."</p> + +<p>"These principles" says Mr. Bovill, "are so engrained in +the mind of an average Boer that we can never expect anything +to be done by the Volksraad for the natives in this respect. It +appears inconceivable," he continues, "that a Government +making any pretence of being a civilized power, at the end of the +nineteenth century, should be so completely ignorant of the most +elementary principles of good government for such a large number +of its subjects."</p> + +<p>As to the access by the natives to the Courts of Law.</p> + +<p>"If you ask a native he will tell you that access to the law-courts +is much too easy, but they are the Criminal Courts of the +Field Cornets and Landdrosts. He suffers so much from these, +that he cannot entertain the idea that the Higher Courts are any +better than the ordinary Field Cornets' or Landdrosts'. However, +there are times when with fear and trepidation he does appeal to +a Higher Court. With what result? If the decision is in favour +of the native, the burghers are up in arms, crying out against the +injustice of a judgment given in favour of a black against a white +man; burghers sigh and say that a great disaster is about to befall +the State when a native can have judgment against a white man. +The inequality of the blacks and superiority of the white +(burghers) is largely discussed. Motions are brought forward in +the Volksraad to prohibit natives pleading in the Higher Courts. +Such is the usual outcry. Summary justice (?) by a Landdrost or +Field Cornet is all the Boer would allow a native. No appeal +should be permitted, for may it not lead to a quashing of the +conviction? The Landdrost is the friend of the Boer, and +he can always "square" him in a matter against a native. "It +was only to prevent an open breach with England that these +appeals to the Higher Courts were permitted in a limited degree."<a name="FNanchor_33_33" href="#Footnote_33_33">[33]</a></p> + +<p>No. 2.—The Native Marriage Laws. "Think," says Mr. +Bovill, "what it would mean to our social life in England if we +were a conquered nation, and the conquerors should say: 'All +your laws and customs are abrogated; your marriage laws are of +no consequence to us; you may follow or leave them as you +please, but we do not undertake to support them, and you may +live like cattle if you wish; we cannot recognise your marriage +laws as binding, nor yet will we legalise any form of marriage +among you.' Such is in effect, the present position of the natives +in the Transvaal.</p> + +<p>"I occasionally took my holidays in Johannesburg, and +assisted the Vicar, during which time I could take charge of +Christian native marriages, of which the State took no cognisance. +A native may marry, and any time after leave his wife, but the +woman would have no legal claim on him. He could marry +again as soon as he pleased, and he could not be proceeded +against either for support of his first wife or for bigamy. And so +he might go on as long as he wished to marry or could get anyone +to marry him. The same is applicable to all persons of +colour, even if only slightly coloured—half-castes of three or four +generations if the colour is at all apparent. All licenses for the +marriage of white people must be applied for personally, and +signed in the presence of the Landdrost, who is very cautious +lest half-castes or persons of colour should get one. Colour is +evidently the only test of unfitness to claim recognition of the +marriage contract by the Transvaal State.</p> + +<p>"The injustice of such a law must be apparent; it places a +premium on vice.<a name="FNanchor_34_34" href="#Footnote_34_34">[34]</a> It gives an excuse to any 'person of colour' +to commit the most heinous offences against the laws of morality +and social order, and protects such a one from the legal consequences +which would necessarily follow in any other civilised +State."</p> + +<p>Mr. Bovill has an instructive chapter on the "Compound +system," and the condition of native compounds. This is a +matter which it is to be hoped will be taken seriously to heart by +the Chartered Company, and any other company or group of +employers throughout African mining districts." The Compound +system of huddling hundreds of natives together in tin shanties +is the very opposite to the free life to which they are accustomed. +If South African mining is to become a settled industry, we must +have the conditions of the labour market settled, and also the +conditions of living. We cannot expect natives to give up their +free open-air style of living, and their home life. They love their +homes, and suffer from homesickness as much as, or probably +more than most white people. The reason so many leave their +work after six months is that they are constantly longing to see +their wives and children. Many times have they said to me, 'It +would be all right if only we could have our wives and families +with us.'"</p> + +<p>"The result of this compound life is the worst possible +morally."....</p> + +<p>"We must treat the native, not as a machine to work when +required under any conditions, but as a raw son of nature, very +often without any moral force to control him and to raise him +much above the lower animal world in his passions, except that +which native custom has given him."</p> + +<p>The writer suggests that "native reserves or locations should +be established on the separate mines, or groups of mines, where +the natives can have their huts built, and live more or less under +the same conditions as they do in their native kraals. If a native +found that he could live under similar conditions to those he has +been accustomed to, he will soon be anxious to save enough +money to bring his wife and children there, and remain in the +labour district for a much longer period than at present is the +case.</p> + +<p>"It would be a distinct gain to the mining industry as well +as to the native."</p> + +<p>Mr. Bovill goes into much detail on the subject of the "Pass +Laws." I should much desire to reproduce his chapter on that +subject, if it were not too long. That system must be wholly +abolished, he says: "it is at present worse than any conditions +under which slavery exists. It is a criminal-making law. Brand +a slave, and you have put him to a certain amount of physical +pain for once, but penalties under the Pass Law system mean +lashes innumerable at the direction of any Boer Field Cornet or +Landdrost. It is a most barbarous system, as brutal as it is +criminal-making, alone worthy of a Boer with an exaggerated +fear of and cowardly brutality towards a race he has been taught +to despise."</p> + +<p>Treating of the prohibition imposed on the Natives as to the +possession in any way or by any means of a piece of land, he +writes: "Many natives are now earning and saving large sums +of money, year by year, at the various labour centres. They +return home with every intention of following a peaceful life; +why should they not be encouraged to put their money into land, +and follow their 'peaceful pursuits' as well as any Boer farmer? +They are capable of doing it. Besides, if they held fixed property +in the State, it would be to their advantage to maintain +law and order, when they had everything they possessed at stake. +With no interest in the land, the tendency must always be to a +nomadic life. They are as thoroughly well capable of becoming +true, peaceful, and loyal citizens of the State as are any other +race of people. Their instincts and training are all towards law +and order. Their lives have been disciplined under native rule, +and now that the white man is breaking up that rule, what is he +going to give as a substitute? Anarchy and lawlessness, or good +government which tends to peace and prosperity?</p> + +<p>"We can only hope for better times, and a more humane +Government for the natives, to wipe out the wrong that has been +done to both black and white under a bastard civilization which +has prevailed in Pretoria for the past fifteen years. The +Government which holds down such a large number of its +subjects by treating them as cut-throats and outlaws, will one +day repent bitterly of its sin of misrule."<a name="FNanchor_35_35" href="#Footnote_35_35">[35]</a></p> + +<hr style='width: 45%;' /> + +<p>Tyranny has a genius for creeping in everywhere, and under +any and every form of government. This is being strikingly +illustrated in these days. Under the name of a Republic, the +traditions of a Military Oligarchy have grown up, and stealthily +prevailed.</p> + +<p>When a nation has no recorded standard of guiding principles +of government, it matters not by what name it may be +called—Empire, Republic, Oligarchy, or Democracy—it may +fall under the blighting influence of the tyranny of a single +individual, or a wealthy clique, or a military despot.</p> + +<p>Too much weight is given just now to mere names as applied +to governments. The acknowledged principles which underlie +the outward forms of government alone are vitally important, and +by the adherence to or abdication of these principles each nation +will be judged. The revered name of <i>Republic</i> is as capable of +being dragged in the mire as that of the title of any other form of +government. Mere names and words have lately had a strange +and even a disastrous power of misleading and deceiving, not +persons only, but nations,—even a whole continent of nations. It +is needful to beware of being drawn into conclusions leading to +action by associations attaching merely to a name, or to some +crystallized word which may sometimes cover a principle the +opposite of that which it was originally used to express. Such +names and words are in some cases being as rapidly changed and +remodelled as geographical charts are which represent new and +rapidly developing or decaying groups of the human race. Yet +names are always to a large part of mankind more significant +than facts; and names and appearances in this matter appeal to +France and to Switzerland, and in a measure to the American +people, in favour of the Boers.</p> + +<p>Among the concessions made by Lord Derby in the Convention +of 1884, none has turned out to be more unfortunate than +that of allowing the Transvaal State to resume the title of the +"South African Republic." In South Africa it embodied an +impossible ideal; to the outside world it conveyed a false +impression. The title has been the reason of widespread error +with regard to the real nature of the Transvaal Government and +of its struggle with this country. If "Republican Independence" +had been all that Mr. Kruger was striving for, there would have +been no war. He adopted the name, but not the spirit of a +Republic. The "Independence" claimed by him, and urged +even now by some of his friends in the British Parliament, is +shown by the whole past history of the Transvaal to be an +independence and a freedom which <i>involve the enslavement of other +men.</i></p> + +<p>A friend writes:—"In order to satisfy my own mind I have +been looking in Latin Dictionaries for the correct and original +meaning of 'impero,' (I govern,) and 'imperium.' The word +'Empire' has an unpleasant ring from some points of view and +to some minds. One thinks of Roman Emperors, Domitian, Nero, +Tiberius,—of the word 'imperious,' and of the French 'Empire' +under Napoleon I. and Napoleon III. The Latin word means +'the giving of commands.' All depends on whether the commands +given are <i>good</i>, and the giver of them also good and wise. The +Ten Commandments are in one sense 'imperial.' Now, I think +the word as used in the phrase <i>British Empire</i> has, in the most +modern and best sense, quite a different savour or flavour from +that of Napoleon's Empire, or the Turkish or Mahommedan +Empires of the past. It has come to mean the 'Dominion of +Freedom' or the 'Reign of Liberty,' rather than the giving of +despotic or tyrannical or oligarchic commands. In fact, our Imperialism +is freedom for all races and peoples who choose to +accept it, whilst Boer <i>Republicanism</i> is the exact opposite. How +strangely words change their weight and value!</p> + +<p>"And yet there still remains the sense of 'command' in +'Empire;' and in the past history of our Government of the Cape +Colony there has been too little wholesome command and +obedience, and too much opportunism, shuffling off of responsibility, +with self-sufficient ignorance and doctrinaire foolishness +taking the place of knowledge and insight. Want of courage is, +I think, in short, at the bottom of the past mismanagement."</p> + +<hr style='width: 45%;' /> + +<p>The assertion is repeatedly made that "England coveted +the gold of the Transvaal, and hence went to war." It is necessary +it seems, again and again, to remind those who speak thus that +England was not the invader. Kruger invaded British Territory, +being fully prepared for war. England was not in the least +prepared for war. This last fact is itself a complete answer to +those who pretend that she was the aggressor.</p> + +<p>In regard to the assertion that "England coveted the gold +of the Transvaal," what is here meant by "England?" Ours is a +representative Government. Are the entire people, with their +representatives in Parliament and the Government included in +this assertion, or is it meant that certain individuals, desiring +gold, went to the Transvaal in search of it? The expression +"England" in this relation, is vague and misleading.</p> + +<p>The search for gold is not in itself a legal nor a moral offence. +But the inordinate desire and pursuit of wealth, becoming the +absorbing motive to the exclusion of all nobler aims, is a moral +offence and a source of corruption.</p> + +<p>Wherever gold is to be found, there is a rush from all sides; +among some honest explorers with legitimate aims, there are +always found, in such a case, a number of unruly spirits, of +scheming, dishonest and careless persons, the scum of the earth, +cheats and vagabonds. The Outlanders who crowded to the +Rand were of different nations, French, Belgians and others, +besides the English who were in a large majority. The presence +and eager rush of this multitude of gold seekers certainly brought +into the country elements which clouded the moral atmosphere, +and became the occasion of deeds which so far from being typical +of the spirit of "England" and the English people at large, were +the very reverse, and have been condemned by public opinion in +our country.</p> + +<p>But, admitting that unworthy motives and corrupting elements +were introduced into the Transvaal by the influx of strangers +urged there by self-interest, it is strange that any should imagine +and assert that the "corrupting influence of gold," or the lust of +gold told upon the British alone. The disasters brought upon +the Transvaal seem to be largely attributable to the corrupting +effect on President Kruger and his allies in the Government, of +the sudden acquisition of enormous wealth, through the development, +by other hands than his own, of the hidden riches within +his country.</p> + +<p>What are the facts? In 1885 the revenue of the Transvaal +State was a little over £177,000. This rose, owing to the +Outlanders' labours, and the taxes exacted from them by the +Transvaal government to £4,400,000 (in 1899). Thus they have +increased in the proportion of 1 to 25. "If the admirers of the +Transvaal government, who place no confidence in documents +emanating from English sources, will take the trouble to open +the <i>Almanack de Gotha</i>, they will there find the financial report +for 1897. There they will read that of these £4,400,000, salaries +and emoluments amount to nearly one-quarter—we will call it +£1,000,000,—that is, £40 per head per adult Boer, for it goes +without saying that in all this the Outlanders have no share. If +we remember that the great majority of the Boers consist of +farmers who do not concern themselves at all about the +Administration, and who consequently get no slice of the cake, +we can judge of the size of the junks which President Kruger +and the chiefly foreign oligarchy on which he leans take to +themselves. The President has a salary of £7,000—(the President +of the Swiss Confederation has £600)—and besides that, what is +called "coffee-money." This is his official income, but his +personal resources do not end there. The same table of the +<i>Almanack de Gotha</i> shows a sum of nearly £660,000 entitled "other +expenses." Under this head are included secret funds, which in +the budget are stated at a little less than £40,000 (more than +even England has), but which always exceed that sum, and in +1896 reached about £200,000. Secret Service Funds!—vile +name and viler reality—should be unknown in the affairs of small +nations. Is not honesty one of the cardinal virtues which we +should expect to find amongst small nations, if nowhere else? +What can the chief of a small State of 250,000 inhabitants do +with such a large amount of Secret funds?</p> + +<p>"We can picture to ourselves what the financial administration +of the Boers must be in this plethora of money, provided +almost entirely by the hated Outlander. An example may be +cited. The Raad were discussing the budget of 1898, and one +of the members called attention to the fact that for several years +past advances to the amount of £2,400,000 had been made to +various officials, and were unaccounted for. That is a specimen +of what the Boer <i>régime</i> has become in this school of opulence."<a name="FNanchor_36_36" href="#Footnote_36_36">[36]</a> +M. Naville continues:—"We do not consider the Boers, as a +people, to be infected by the corruption which rules the administration. +The farmers who live far from Pretoria have preserved +their patriarchal virtues: they are upright and honest, but at the +same time very proud, and impatient of every kind of authority.... They +are ignorant, and read no books or papers—only the +Old Testament; but Kruger knew he could rouse these people +by waving before them the spectre of England, and crying in +their ears the word 'Independence.' And this is what disgusts +us, that under cover of principles so dear to us all, independence +and national honour, these brave men are sent to the battlefield +to preserve for a tyrannical and venal oligarchy the right to share +amongst themselves, and distribute as they please, the gold which +is levied on the work of foreigners."</p> + +<p>FOOTNOTES:</p> + +<p><a name="Footnote_30_30" href="#FNanchor_30_30">[30]</a> Parliamentary Blue Book, 4194, 42.</p> + +<p><a name="Footnote_31_31" href="#FNanchor_31_31">[31]</a> Austral Africa, Chap. 4, pages 235-250.</p> + +<p><a name="Footnote_32_32" href="#FNanchor_32_32">[32]</a> Austral Africa, p. 233 and on.</p> + +<p><a name="Footnote_33_33" href="#FNanchor_33_33">[33]</a> Natives under the Transvaal Flag. Revd. John H. Bovill.</p> + +<p><a name="Footnote_34_34" href="#FNanchor_34_34">[34]</a> It is stated on the authority of <i>The Sentinel</i> (London, +June, 1900), that Mr. Kruger was asked some years ago to permit the +introduction in the Johannesburg mining district of the State regulation +of vice, and that Mr. Kruger stoutly refused to entertain such an idea. +Very much to his credit! Yet it seems to me that the refusal to legalize +native marriages comes rather near, in immorality of principle and +tendency, to the legalizing of promiscuous intercourse.</p> + +<p><a name="Footnote_35_35" href="#FNanchor_35_35">[35]</a> Natives under the Transvaal Flag, by Rev. J. Bovill.</p> + +<p><a name="Footnote_36_36" href="#FNanchor_36_36">[36]</a> La question du Transvaal, by Professor Ed. Naville, +of Geneva.</p> + + + +<hr style="width: 65%;" /> +<h2><a name="VIII"></a>VIII.</h2> + +<blockquote><p>THE THEOLOGY OF THE BOERS. EXPLOITATION OF NATIVES BY +CAPITALISTS. BRITISH COLONIZING.—ITS CAUSES AND +NATURE. CHARACTER OF PAUL KRUGER AS A RULER. THE +MORAL TEACHINGS OF THE WAR. OUR RESPONSIBILITIES. +HASTY JUDGMENTS. DENUNCIATIONS OF ENGLAND BY +ENGLISHMEN. THE OPEN BOOK. MY LAST WORD IS FOR +THE NATIVE RACES.</p></blockquote> + +<p>Even in these enlightened days there seems to be in some minds a strange +confusion as to the understanding of the principle of Equality for which +we plead, and which is one of the first principles laid down in the +Charter of our Liberties. What is meant in that charter is <i>Equality of +all before the Law</i>; not by any means social equality, which belongs to +another region of political ideas altogether.</p> + +<p>A friend who has lived in South Africa, and who has had natives working +for and with him, tells me of this confusion of ideas among some of the +more vulgar stamp of white colonists, who, my friend observes, amuse +themselves by assuming a familiarity in intercourse with the natives, +which works badly. It does not at all increase their respect for the +white man, but quite the contrary, while it is as little calculated to +produce self-respect in the native. My friend found the natives +naturally respectful and courteous, when treated justly and humanely, in +fact as a <i>gentleman</i> would treat them. Above all things, they +honour a man who is just. They have a keen sense of justice, and a quick +perception of the existence of this crowning quality in a man. +Livingstone said that he found that they also have a keen eye for a man +of pure and moral life.</p> + +<p>The natives in the Transvaal have never asked for the +franchise, or for the smallest voice in the Government. In their +hearts they hoped for and desired simple legal justice; they +asked for bread, and they received a stone. It does not seem +desirable that they should too early become "full fledged voters." +Some sort of Education test, some proof of a certain amount of +civilization and instruction attained, might be applied with +advantage; and to have to wait a little while for that does not +seem, from the Englishwoman's point of view at least, a great +hardship, when it is remembered how long our agricultural +labourers had to wait for that privilege, and that for more than +fifty years English women have petitioned for it, and have not +yet obtained it, although they are not, I believe, wholly uncivilized +or uneducated.</p> + +<p>The Theology of the Boers has been much commented upon; +and it is supposed by some that, as they are said to derive it +solely from the Old Testament Scriptures, it follows that the +ethical teaching of those Scriptures must be extremely defective. +A Swiss Pastor writes to me: "It is time to rescue the Old +Testament from the Boer interpretation of it. We have not +enough of Old Testament righteousness among us Christians." +This is true. Those who have studied those Scriptures intelligently +see, through much that appears harsh and strange in the +Mosaic prescriptions, a wisdom and tenderness which approaches +to the Christian ideal, as well as certain severe rules and +restrictions which, when observed and maintained, lifted the +moral standard of the Hebrew people far above that of the +surrounding nations. When Christ came on earth, He swept +away all that which savoured of barbarism, the husk which often +however, contained within it a kernel of truth capable of a great +development. "Ye have heard it said of old times," He reiterated, +"<i>but I say unto you</i>"—and then He set forth the higher, the +eternally true principles of action.</p> + +<p>Yet if the Transvaal teachers and their disciples had read +impartially (though even exclusively) the Old Testament Scriptures, +they could not have failed to see how grossly they were +themselves offending against the divine commands in some vital +matters. I cite, as an example, the following commands, given +by Moses to the people, not once only, but repeatedly. Had +these commands been regarded with as keen an appreciation as +some others whose teaching seems to have an opposite tendency, +it is impossible that the natives should have been treated as they +have been by Boer Law, or that Slavery or Serfdom should have +existed among them for so many generations. The following are +some of the often-repeated commands and warnings:</p> + +<p>Ex. xii. <i>v</i> 19.—"One law shall be to him that is homeborn, +and unto the stranger that sojourneth among you."</p> + +<p>Num. ix. <i>v</i> 14.—"If a stranger shall sojourn among you,... ye +shall have one ordinance, both for the stranger, and for +him that was born in the land."</p> + +<p>Num. xv. <i>v</i> 15.—"One ordinance shall be both for you of +the congregation, and also for the stranger that sojourneth with +you, an ordinance for ever in your generation: as ye are so shall +the stranger be before the Lord."</p> + +<p>Verse 16.—"One law and one manner shall be for you, and +for the stranger that sojourneth with you."</p> + +<p>Lev. xix. <i>v</i> 33.—"And if a stranger sojourn with thee +in your land, ye shall not vex him."</p> + +<p>Verse 34.—"But the stranger that dwelleth with you shall +be unto you as one born among you, and thou shalt love him as +thyself; for ye were strangers in the land of Egypt."</p> + +<p>Verse 35.—"Ye shall do no unrighteousness in judgment, in +mete-yard, in weight, or in measure."</p> + +<p>Although the natives of the Transvaal were the original +possessors of the country, they have been reckoned by the Boers +as strangers and foreigners among them. They have treated +them as the ancient Jews treated all Gentiles as for ever excluded +from the Commonwealth of Israel,—until in the "fulness of +time" they were forced by a great shock and terrible judgments—to +acknowledge, with astonishment, that "God had also to the +Gentiles granted repentance unto life," and that they also had +heard the news of the glorious emancipation of all the sons of +God throughout the earth.</p> + +<p>Not only is the non-payment, but even delay in the payment +of wages condemned by the Law of Moses. Is it possible that +Boer theologians, who quote Scripture with so much readiness, +have never read the following?</p> + +<p>Lev. xix. <i>v</i> 13.—"Thou shalt not defraud thy neighbour, +neither rob him: the wages of him that is hired shall not abide +with thee all night until the morning."</p> + +<p>Deut. xxiv. <i>v</i> 14.—"Thou shalt not oppress an hired +servant that is poor and needy, whether he be of thy brethren, or +of the strangers that are in thy land, within thy gates."</p> + +<p>Verse 15.—"At his day thou shalt give him his hire, neither +shall the sun go down upon it; for he is poor, and setteth his +heart upon it: lest he cry against thee unto the Lord, and it be +sin unto thee."</p> + +<p>Jer. xxii. <i>v</i> 13.—"Woe unto him that buildeth his house by +unrighteousness, and his chambers by wrong; that useth his +neighbour's service without wages, and giveth him not for his +work."</p> + +<p>Mal. iii. <i>v</i> 5.—"And I will come near to you to judgment; +and I will be a swift witness against ... those that oppress the +hireling in his wages, the widow, and the fatherless, and that +turn aside the stranger from his right, and fear not me, saith +the Lord of hosts."</p> + +<p>The following is from the New Testament, but it might +have come under the notice of Boer theologians and Law +makers:—</p> + +<p>The epistle of St. James v. <i>v</i> 4.—"Behold the hire of the +labourers who have reaped down your fields which is of you +kept back by fraud, crieth; and the cries of them which have +reaped are entered into the ears of the Lord of Sabaoth."</p> + +<p>Verse 3.—"Your gold and your silver is cankered, and the +rust of them shall be a witness against you."</p> + +<p>Jer. xxxv. <i>v</i> 17.—"Because ye have not proclaimed Liberty +every man to his neighbour, behold I proclaim Liberty for you, +saith the Lord, to the Sword, to the pestilence, and to the famine."</p> + +<p>I am aware that there will be voices raised at once in +application to certain English people of the very commands here +cited; and justly so, so far as that application is made to +individuals or groups of persons who have transgressed not only +Biblical Law but the Law of our Land in their dealings with +native races; and the warning conveyed to us in such recriminations +must not and, I believe, will not be unheeded.</p> + +<p>The following occurs in a number of the "Ethical World," +published early in the present year:—"We know that capitalists, +left to themselves, would mercilessly exploit the labour of the +coloured man. That is precisely the reason why they should +not be left to themselves, but should be under the control of the +British Empire. It is a reason why Crown colonies should +supersede Chartered Companies; it is a reason for much that is +often called 'shallow Imperialism.' If the present war had been +staved off, and if, by mere lapse of time and increase of numbers +<i>without British intervention</i>, the Outlanders had come to be the +masters of the South African Republic, they might have established +a system of independent government quite as bad as that +now in existence, though not hardened against reform by the +same archaic traditions."</p> + +<p>To my mind some of the published utterances of the Originator +and members of the "Chartered Company" are not such as to +inspire confidence in those who desire to see the essential principles +of British Law and Government paramount wherever Great Britain +has sway. There is the old contemptuous manner of speaking +of the natives; and we have heard an expression of a desire to +"eliminate the Imperial Factor."</p> + +<p>This elimination of the Imperial Factor is precisely +that which is the least desired by those who see our Imperialism +to mean the continuance of obedience to the just traditions of +British Law and Government. The granting of a Charter to a +Company lends the authority (or the appearance of it) of the +Queen's name to acts of the responsible heads of that company, +which may be opposed to the principles of justice established by +British Law; and such acts may have disastrous results. It is +to be hoped that the present awakening on the subject of past +failures of our government to enforce respect for its own principles +may be a warning to all concerned against any transgression of +those principles.</p> + +<p>Continental friends with whom I have conversed on the +subject of the British Colonies have sometimes appeared to me +to leave out of account some considerations special to the subject. +They regard British Colonization as having been accomplished +by a series of acts of aggression, solely inspired by the love of +conquest and desire for increased territory. This is an error.</p> + +<p>I would ask such friends to take a Map of Europe, or of the +World, and steadily to regard it in connection with the following +facts. Our people are among the most prolific,—if not the most +prolific,—of all the nations. Energy and enterprise are in their +nature, together with a certain love of free-breathing, adventure +and discovery. Now look at the map, and observe how small is +the circumference of the British Isles. "Our Empire has no +geographical continuity like the Russian Empire; it is that +larger Venice with no narrow streets, but with the sea itself for +a high-road. It is bound together by a moral continuity alone." +What are our Sons to do? Must our immense population be +debarred from passing through these ocean tracts to lands where +there are great uninhabited wastes capable of cultivation? What +shall we do with our sons and our daughters innumerable, as the +ways become overcrowded in the mother land, and energies have +not the outlets needful to develop them. Shall we place legal +restrictions on marriage, or on the birth of children, or prescribe +that no family shall exceed a certain number? You are shocked,—naturally. +It follows then that some members of our large +British families must cross the seas and seek work and bread +elsewhere.</p> + +<p>The highest and lowest, representing all ranks, engage in +this kind of initial colonization. Our present Prime Minister, a +"younger son," went out in his youth,—as others of his class +have done,—with his pickaxe, to Australia, to rank for a time +among "diggers" until called home by the death of the elder +son, the heir to the title and estate. This necessity and this +taste for wandering and exploring has helped in some degree to +form the independence of character of our men, and also to +strengthen rather than to weaken the ties of affection and kinship +with the Motherland. Many men, "nobly born and gently +nurtured," have thus learned self-dependence, to endure hardships, +and to share manual labour with the humblest; and such an +experience does not work for evil. Then when communities have +been formed, some sort of government has been necessitated. An +appeal is made to the Mother Country, and her offspring have +grown up more or less under her regard and care, until self-government +has developed itself.</p> + +<p>The great blot on this necessary and natural expansion is +the record (from time to time) of the displacement of native +tribes by force and violence, when their rights seemed to interfere +with the interests of the white man. Of such action we have +had to repent in the past, and we repent more deeply than ever +now when our responsibilities towards natives races have been +brought with startling clearness before those among us who have +been led to look back and to search deeply into the meanings of +the present great "history-making war."</p> + +<p>The personality of Paul Kruger stands out mournfully at this +moment on the page of history. Mr. FitzPatrick wrote of him in +1896, as follows:—</p> + +<p>"<i>L'Etat c'est moi</i>, is almost as true of the old Dopper President +as it was of its originator; for in matters of external policy +and in matters which concern the Boer as a party, the President +has his way as completely as any anointed autocrat. To anyone +who has studied the Boers and their ways and policy ... it +must be clear that President Kruger does more than represent +the opinion of the people and execute their policy: he moulds +them in the form he wills. By the force of his own strong +convictions and prejudices, and of his indomitable will, he has +made the Boers a people whom he regards as the germ of the +Afrikander nation; a people chastened, selected, welded, and +strong enough to attract and assimilate all their kindred in South +Africa, and thus to realize the dream of a Dutch Republic from +the Zambesi to Cape Town.</p> + +<p>"In the history of South Africa the figure of the grim old +President will loom large and striking,—picturesque as the +figure of one who, by his character and will, made and held his +people; magnificent as one who, in the face of the blackest +fortune, never wavered from his aim or faltered in his effort ... and +it maybe, pathetic too, as one whose limitations were great, +one whose training and associations,—whose very successes had +narrowed and embittered and hardened him;—as one who, when +the greatness of success was his to take and to hold, turned his +back on the supreme opportunity, and used his strength and +qualities to fight against the spirit of progress, and all that the +enlightenment of the age pronounces to be fitting and necessary to +good government and a healthy State.</p> + +<p>"To an English nobleman, who in the course of an interview +remarked, 'my father was a Minister (of the Queen),' the +Dutchman answered, 'and my father was a shepherd!' It was +not pride rebuking pride; it was the ever present fact which +would not have been worth mentioning but for the suggestion of +the antithesis. He, too, was a shepherd,—a peasant. It may +be that he knew what would be right and good for his people, +and it may be not; but it is sure that he realized that to educate +would be to emancipate, to broaden their views would be to break +down the defences of their prejudices, to let in the new leaven +would be to spoil the old bread, to give to all men the rights of +men would be to swamp for ever the party which is to him +greater than the State. When one thinks of the one century +history of that people, much is seen which accounts for their +extraordinary love of isolation, and their ingrained and passionate +aversion to control; much, too, that draws to them a world of +sympathy; and when one realizes the old President hemmed in +once more by the hurrying tide of civilization, from which his +people have fled for generations—trying to fight both fate and +Nature—standing up to stem a tide as resistless as the eternal +sea—one realizes the pathos of the picture. But this is as +another generation may see it. We are now too close—so close +that the meaner details, the blots and flaws, are all most plainly +visible, the corruption, the insincerity, the injustice, the +barbarity—all the unlovely touches that will bye and bye be +forgotten—sponged away by the gentle hand of time, when only the +picturesque will remain."<a name="FNanchor_37_37" href="#Footnote_37_37">[37]</a></p> + +<p>And now that his sun is setting in the midst of clouds, and +the great ambition of his life lies a ruin before him, and age, +disappointment, and sorrow press heavily upon him, reproach +and criticism are silenced. Compassion and a solemn awe alone +fill our hearts.</p> + +<p>A late awakening and repentance may not serve to maintain +the political life of a party or a nation; but it is never too late +for a human soul to receive for itself the light that may have +been lacking for right guidance all through the past, and God +does not finally withdraw Himself from one who has ever sincerely +called upon His name.</p> + +<p>I beg to be allowed to address a word, in conclusion, more +especially to certain of my own countrymen,—among whom I +count some of my valued fellow-workers of the past years. These +latter have been very patient with me at times when I have +ventured a word of warning in connection with the Abolitionist +war in which we have together been engaged, and perhaps they +will bear with me now; but whether they will do so or not, I +must speak that which seems to me the truth, that which is laid +on my heart to speak. I refer especially to the temper of mind +of those whose present denunciations of our country are apparently +not restrained by considerations derived from a deeper and calmer +view of the whole situation.</p> + +<p>When God's Judgments are in the earth, "the people of the +world will learn righteousness." Are we learning righteousness? +Am I, are you, friends, learning righteousness? I desire, at least, +to be among those who may learn something of the mind of God +towards His redeemed world, even in the darkest hour. But you +will tell me perhaps that there is nothing of the Divine purpose +in all this tribulation, that God has allowed evil to have full sway +in the world for a time. Others among us, as firmly believe that +there is a Divine permission in the natural vengeance which +follows transgression, that we are never the sport of a senseless +fate, and that God governs as well as reigns.</p> + +<div class="poem"> +<div class='stanza'><div>"God's fruit of justice ripens slow;</div> +<div>"Men's souls are narrow; let them grow,</div> +<div>"My brothers, we must wait."</div></div> +</div> + +<p>Many among us are learning to see more and more clearly +that the present "tribulation" is the climax of a long series,—through +almost a century past,—of errors of which till now +we had never been fully conscious,—of neglect of duty, of +casting off of responsibility, of oblivion of the claims of the +millions of native inhabitants of Africa who are God's creatures +and the redeemed of Christ as much as we,—of ambitions and +aims purely worldly, of a breathless race among nations for present +and material gain.</p> + +<p>There are hasty judges it seems to me who look upon this +war as the <i>Initial Crime</i>, a sudden and fatal error into which our +nation has leapt in a fit of blind passion aroused by some quite +recent event, and chiefly chargeable to certain individuals living +among us to-day, who represent, in their view, a deplorable +deterioration of the whole nation. The evils (which are not chiefly +attributable to our nation) which have led up to this war, and +made it from the human point of view, inevitable, are all ignored +by these judges. Like the servant in one of the Parables of +Christ, who said "my Lord delayeth his coming," (God is +nowhere among us,) and began to beat and abuse his fellow-servants, +they fall to inflicting on their fellow citizens unmeasured +blows of the tongue and pen, because of this war. Their hearts +are so full of indignation that they cannot see anything higher +or deeper than the material strife. They judge the combatants, +our poor soldiers, the first victims, with little tenderness or +sympathy. When King David was warned by God of approaching +chastisement for his sins as a ruler, he pleaded that that chastisement +should fall upon himself alone, saying, "these sheep (the +people) what have they done?" We may ask the same of the +rank and file of our army. What have they done? It was not +they who ordained the war, and so far as personal influence may +have gone to provoke war, many of those who sit at home at ease +are more to blame than the men who believe that they are obeying +the call of duty when they offer themselves for perils, for hardships, +wounds, sickness, and lingering as well as sudden death.</p> + +<p>God's thoughts, however, are "not as our thoughts," nor +"His ways as our ways." The record I might give of spiritual +awakening and extraordinary blessing bestowed by Him at this +time in the very heart of this war on these, the "first victims" +of it, would be received I fear with complete incredulity by those +to whom I now address myself. Be it so. The sources of my +information are from "the front," they are many and they are +trustworthy. It seems to me that in visiting the sins of the +fathers on the children, or of rulers on the people, the Great +Father of all, in His infinite love has said to these multitudes: +"Your bodies are given to destruction, but I have set wide open +for you the door of salvation; you Shall enter into my kingdom +through death." And many have so entered.<a name="FNanchor_38_38" href="#Footnote_38_38">[38]</a></p> + +<p>The following is the expression of the thought of many of +our humble people at home, who are neither "jingoes" nor yet +impatient judges of others. The Journal from which the extract +is taken represents not the wealthy nor ambitious part of society, +but that of the middle class of people, dependent on their own +efforts for their daily bread, among whom we often find much good +sense:—"Some persons are humiliated for the sins and mistakes +they see in other people. As for themselves, their one thought +is 'If my advice had been taken the country would never have +been in this pass!' This is the expression of an utterly un-Christian +self-conceit. Others, again, take delight in recording +the sins of the nation. That our ideals have been dimmed, that +a low order of public morality has been openly defended in the +highest places, and that the reckoning has come to us we fully +believe. Yet it is possible to judge the heart of our people far +too harshly. It is a sound heart when all is said and done. We +fix our eyes upon the great and wealthy offenders; but it must +be remembered that the British people are not wealthy. The +number of rich men is small. Most of us, in fact, are very poor. +Even those who may be called well off depend on the continuance +of health and opportunity for their incomes. The vast majority +of those who believe that our cause is righteous are not exultant +jingoes, neither are they millionaires. They are care-worn toilers, +hard-worked fathers and mothers of children. They have in many +cases given sons and brothers and husbands to our ranks; their +hearts are aching with passionate sorrow for the dead. Many more +are enduring the racking agony of suspense. Multitudes, besides, +spend their lives in a hard fight to keep the wolf from the door. +Already they are pinched, and they know that in the months +ahead their poverty will be deeper. Yet they have no thought of +surrender. They do not even complain, but give what they can +from their scanty means to succour those who are touched still +more nearly. It is quite possible to slander a nation when one +simply intends to tell it plain truths. The British nation, we are +inclined to believe, is a great deal better and sounder than many +of its shrillest censors of the moment. And, for our part, we find +among our patient, brave, and silent people great seed-beds of +trust and hope."<a name="FNanchor_39_39" href="#Footnote_39_39">[39]</a></p> + +<p>These are noble words, because words of faith—worthy of +the Roman, Varro—to whom his fellow-citizens presented a public +tribute of gratitude because "he had not despaired of his country +in a dark and troubled time."</p> + +<p>It can hardly be supposed that I underrate the horrors of +war. I have imagination enough and sympathy enough to follow +almost as if I beheld it with my eyes, the great tragedy which +has been unfolded in South Africa. The spirit of Jingoism is an +epidemic of which I await the passing away more earnestly than +we do that of any other plague. I deprecate, as I have always +done, and as strongly as anyone can do, rowdyism in the form of +violent opposition to free speech and freedom of meeting. It is as +wholly unjustifiable, as it is unwise. Nothing tends more to the +elucidation of truth than evidence and freedom of speech from +all sides. Good works on many hands are languishing for lack +of the funds and zeal needful to carry them on. The Public +Press, and especially the Pictorial Press, fosters a morbid sentiment +in the public mind by needlessly vivid representations of +mere slaughter; to all this may be added (that which some mourn +over most of all) the drain upon our pockets,—upon the country's +wealth. All these things are a part of the great tribulation which +is upon us. They are inevitable ingredients of the chastisement +by war.</p> + +<p>I see frequent allusions to the "deplorable state of the +public mind," which is so fixed on this engrossing subject, the +war, that its attention cannot be gained for any other. I hear +our soldiers called "legalized murderers," and the war spoken of +as a "hellish panorama,"<a name="FNanchor_40_40" href="#Footnote_40_40">[40]</a> which it is a blight even to look upon.</p> + +<p>But,—I am impelled to say it at the risk of sacrificing the +respect of certain friends,—there is to me another view of the +matter. It is this. In this present woe, as in all other earthly +events, God has something to say to us,—something which we +cannot receive if we wilfully turn away the eye from seeing and +the ear from hearing.</p> + +<p>It is as if—in anticipation of the last great Judgment when +"the Books shall be opened,"—God, in his severity and yet in +mercy (for there is always mercy in the heart of His judgments) +had set before us at this day an open book, the pages of which +are written in letters of blood, and that He is waiting for us to +read. There are some who are reading, though with eyes dimmed +with tears and hearts pierced with sorrow—whose attitude is, +"Speak, Lord, for Thy servant heareth."</p> + +<p>You "deplore the state of the public mind." May not the +cloud of celestial witnesses deplore in a measure the state of <i>your</i> +mind which leads you to turn your back on the opened book of +judgment, and refuse to read it? Does your sense of duty to your +country claim from you to send forth such a cry against your +fellow-citizens and your nation that you have no ears for the +solemn teachings of Providence? Might it not be more heroic +in us all to cease to denounce, and to begin to enquire?—with +humility and courage to look God in the face, and enquire of +Him the inner meanings of His rebukes, to ask Him to "turn +back the floods of ungodliness" which have swelled this inundation +of woe, rather than to use our poor little besoms in trying to +sweep back the Atlantic waves of His judgments.</p> + +<p>It is good and necessary to protest against War; but at the +same time, reason and experience teach that we must, with equal +zeal, protest against other great evils, the accumulation of which +makes for war and not for peace. War in another sense—moral +and spiritual war—must be doubled, trebled, quadrupled, +in the future, in order that material war may come to an +end. We all wish for peace; every reasonable person desires it, +every anxious and bereaved family longs for it, every Christian +prays for it. But <i>what</i> Peace? It is the Peace of God which we +pray for? the Peace on Earth, which He alone can bring about? +His hand alone, which corrects, can also heal. We do not and +cannot desire the peace which some of those are calling for who +dare not face the open book of present day judgment, or who do +not wish to read its lessons! Such a peace would be a mere +plastering over of an unhealed wound, which would break out +again before many years were over.</p> + +<p>There seems to me a lack of imagination and of Christian +sympathy in the zeal which thrusts denunciatory literature +into all hands and houses, as is done just now. It would, I +think, check such action and open the eyes of some who +adopt it, if they could see the look of pain, the sudden pallor, +followed by hours and days of depression of the mourners, +widows, bereaved parents, sisters and friends, when called upon +to read (their hearts full of the thought of their beloved dead) +that those who have fought in the ranks were morally criminal, +legalized murderers, "full of hatred," actors in a "hellish panorama." +Some of these sufferers may not be much enlightened, +but they know what love and sorrow are. Would it not be more +tender and tactful, from the Christian point of view, to leave to +them their consoling belief that those whom they loved acted +from a sense of duty or a sentiment of patriotism; and not, just +at a time of heart-rending sorrow, to press upon them the +criminality of all and every one concerned in any way with war? +I commend this suggestion to those who are not strangers to the +value of personal sympathy and gentleness towards those who +mourn.</p> + +<p>No, we are not yet looking upon hell! It may be, it <i>is</i>, an +earthly purgatory which we are called to look upon; a place and +an hour of purging and of purifying, such as we must all, +nations and individuals alike, pass through, before we can see +the face of God.</p> + +<p>Mr. Fullerton, speaking in the Melbourne Hall, Leicester, +on Jan. 7th of this year, said:—"The Valley of Achor (Trouble), +may be a Door of Hope." "You say the Transvaal belongs to +the Boers; I say it belongs to God. If it belongs specially to +any, it belongs to the Zulus and Kaffirs, on whom, for 100 years, +there have been inflicted wrongs worthy of Arab slave dealers. +What has the Boer done to lift these people? Nothing. As a +Missionary said the other day, 'A nation that lives amongst a +lower race of people, and does not try to lift them, inevitably sinks.' +The Boers needed to be chastised; only thus could they be kept +from sinking; only thus can there be hope for the native races. +Who shall chastise them? Another nation, which God wishes +also to chastise. Is therefore God for one nation and not for +another? May He not be for one, and for the other too? If +both pray, must He refuse one? Perhaps God is great enough +to answer both, and bringing both through the fire, purge and +teach them."</p> + +<p>It would have been bad for us if we had won an early or an +easy victory. We should have been so lifted up with pride as to +be an offence to high Heaven. But we have gone and are going +through deep waters, and the wounds inflicted on many hearts +and many homes are not quickly healed. In this we recognise +the hand of God, who is faithful in chastisement as in blessing.</p> + +<p>Many have, no doubt, read, and I hope some have laid to +heart, the words which Lord Rosebery recently addressed to the +Press, but which are applicable to us all at this juncture. They +are wise and statesmanlike words. Taking them as addressed to +the Nation and not to the Press only, they run thus: "At such a +juncture we must be sincere, we must divest ourselves of the mere +catchwords and impulses of party.... We must be prepared +to discard obsolete shibboleths, to search out abuse, to disregard +persons, to be instant in pressing for necessary reforms—social, +educational, administrative, and if need be, constitutional.</p> + +<p>"Moreover, with regard to a sane appreciation of the +destinies and responsibilities of Empire, we stand at the parting +of the ways. Will Britain flinch or falter in her world-wide +task? How is she best to pursue it? What new forces and +inspiration will it need? What changes does it involve? These +are questions which require clear sight, cool courage, and +freedom from formula."<a name="FNanchor_41_41" href="#Footnote_41_41">[41]</a></p> + +<p>In the conscientious study which I have endeavoured to +make of the history of the past century of British rule in South +Africa, nothing has struck me more than the unfortunate effects +in that Colony of our varying policy inspired by political party +spirit in the Mother Country; and consequently I hail with +thankfulness this good counsel to "divest ourselves of mere +catchwords and impulses of party, to discard obsolete shibboleths, +to free ourselves from formula, and to disregard persons," even if +these persons are or have been recognized leaders, and to abide +rather by principles. "What new forces and inspiration do we +need," Lord Rosebery asks, for the great task our nation has +before it? This is a deep and far-reaching question. The +answer to it should be sought and earnestly enquired after by +every man and woman among us, who is worthy of the name of +a true citizen.</p> + +<p>My last word must be on behalf of the Natives. When, +thirty years ago, a few among us were impelled to take up the +cause of the victims of the modern white slavery in Europe, we +were told that in our pleadings for principles of justice and for +personal rights, we ought not to have selected a subject in which +are concerned persons who may deserve pity, but who, in fact, +are not so important a part of the human family as to merit such +active and passionate sympathy as that which moved our group. +To this our reply was: "We did not <i>choose</i> this question, we did +not ourselves deliberately elect to plead for these persons. The +question was <i>imposed upon us</i>, and once so imposed, we could not +escape from the claims of the oppressed class whose cause we had +been called to take up. And generally, (we replied,) the work of +human progress has not consisted in protecting and supporting +any outward forms of government, or the noble or privileged +classes, but in undertaking the defence of the weak, the humble, +of beings devoted to degradation and contempt, or brought under +any oppression or servitude."</p> + +<p>It is the same now. My father was one of the energetic +promoters of the Abolition of Slavery in the years before 1834, +a friend of Clarkson and Wilberforce. The horror of slavery in +every form, and under whatever name, which I have probably +partly inherited, has been intensified as life went on. It is my +deep conviction that Great Britain will in future be judged, +condemned or justified, according to her treatment of those +innumerable coloured races, heathen or partly Christianized, over +whom her rule extends, or who, beyond the sphere of her rule, +claim her sympathy and help as a Christian and civilizing power +to whom a great trust has been committed.</p> + +<p>It grieves me to observe that (so far as I am able to judge) +our politicians, public men, and editors, (with the exception of +the editors of the "religious press,") appear to a great extent +unaware of the immense importance of this subject, even for the +future peace and stability of our Empire, apart from higher +interests. It <i>will</i> be "imposed upon them," I do not doubt, +sooner or later, as it has been imposed upon certain missionaries +and others who regard the Divine command as practical and +sensible men should do: "Go ye and teach <i>all</i> nations." All +cannot <i>go</i> to the ends of the earth; but all might cease to hinder +by the dead weight of their indifference, and their contempt of all +men of colour. Dr. Livingstone rebuked the Boers for contemptuously +calling all coloured men Kaffirs, to whatever race +they belonged. Englishmen deserve still more such a rebuke for +their habit of including all the inhabitants of India, East and +West, and of Africa, who have not European complexions, under +the contemptuous title of "niggers." Race prejudice is a poison +which will have to be cast out if the world is ever to be +Christianized, and if Great Britain is to maintain the high and +responsible place among the nations which has been given to +her.</p> + +<p>"It maybe that the Kaffir is sometimes cruel," says one who +has seen and known him,—"he certainly requires supervision. +But he was bred in cruelty and reared in oppression—the child +of injustice and hate. As the springbok is to the lion, as the locust +is to the hen, so is the Kaffir to the Boer; a subject of plunder +and leaven of greed. But the Kaffir is capable of courage and +also of the most enduring affection. He has been known to risk +his life for the welfare of his master's family. He has worked +without hope of reward. He has laboured in the expectation of +pain. He has toiled in the snare of the fowler. Yet shy a brickbat +at him!—for he is only a Kaffir! "However much the +Native may excel in certain qualities of the heart, still, until purged +of the poison of racial contempt, that will be the expression of +the practical conclusion of the white man regarding him; "Shy +a brickbat at him. He is only a nigger."</p> + +<p>A merely theoretical acknowledgment of the vital nature of +this question, of the future of the Native races and of Missionary +work will not suffice. The Father of the great human family +demands more than this.</p> + +<div class="poem"> +<div class='stanza'><div class='i2'>"Is not this the fast that I have chosen?</div> +<div class='i2'>To loose the bands of wickedness,</div> +<div class='i2'>To undo the heavy burdens,</div> +<div class='i2'>To let the oppressed go free,</div> +<div>And that ye break every yoke?"</div></div> +</div> + +<p class='right'>(ISAIAH lviii. 6.)</p> + +<hr style="width: 65%;" /> + +<p>I have spoken, in this little book, as an Abolitionist,—being a +member of the "International Federation for the Abolition of the +State regulation of vice." But I beg my readers to understand +that I have here spoken for myself alone, and that my views must +not be understood to be shared by members of the Federation to +which I refer. My Abolitionist friends on the Continent of +Europe, with very few exceptions, hold an opinion absolutely +opposed to mine on the general question here treated. It is not +far otherwise in England itself, where many of our Abolitionists, +including some of my oldest and most valued fellow-workers, +stand on a very different ground from mine in this matter. I +value friendship, and I love my old friends. But I love truth +more. I have very earnestly sought to know the truth in the +matter here treated. I have not rejected evidence from any +side, having read the most extreme as well as the more moderate +writings on different sides, including those which have reached +me from Holland, France, Switzerland, Germany, and the +Transvaal, as well as those published in England. Having +conscientiously arrived at certain conclusions, based on facts, +and on life-long convictions in regard to some grave matters of +principle, I have thought it worth while to put those conclusions +on record.</p> + +<p class='right'>J.E.B.</p> + +<p>FOOTNOTES:</p> + +<p><a name="Footnote_37_37" href="#FNanchor_37_37">[37]</a> The Transvaal from Within. FitzPatrick.</p> + +<p><a name="Footnote_38_38" href="#FNanchor_38_38">[38]</a> This may also be true of the Boer combatants sacrificed for +the sins of their rulers, but I prefer only to attest that of which I +have full proof.</p> + +<p><a name="Footnote_39_39" href="#FNanchor_39_39">[39]</a> "British Weekly."</p> + +<p><a name="Footnote_40_40" href="#FNanchor_40_40">[40]</a> An Expression reported to have been used by Mr. Morley.</p> + +<p><a name="Footnote_41_41" href="#FNanchor_41_41">[41]</a> <i>Daily News</i>, June 4th, 1900.</p> + +<div>*** END OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK 14299 ***</div> +</body> +</html> + |