summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
-rw-r--r--.gitattributes3
-rw-r--r--13480-0.txt1936
-rw-r--r--13480-h/13480-h.htm1949
-rw-r--r--LICENSE.txt11
-rw-r--r--README.md2
-rw-r--r--old/13480-8.txt2323
-rw-r--r--old/13480-8.zipbin0 -> 43765 bytes
-rw-r--r--old/13480-h.zipbin0 -> 46044 bytes
-rw-r--r--old/13480-h/13480-h.htm2362
-rw-r--r--old/13480.txt2323
-rw-r--r--old/13480.zipbin0 -> 43721 bytes
11 files changed, 10909 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/.gitattributes b/.gitattributes
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..6833f05
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.gitattributes
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+* text=auto
+*.txt text
+*.md text
diff --git a/13480-0.txt b/13480-0.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..538ce5a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/13480-0.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,1936 @@
+*** START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK 13480 ***
+
+NOTES AND QUERIES:
+
+A MEDIUM OF INTER-COMMUNICATION FOR LITERARY MEN, ARTISTS, ANTIQUARIES,
+GENEALOGISTS, ETC.
+
+ * * * * *
+
+"When found, make a note of."--CAPTAIN CUTTLE.
+
+ * * * * *
+
+No. 49.] SATURDAY, OCTOBER 5, 1850 [Price Threepence. Stamped Edition 4d.
+
+ * * * * * {289}
+
+
+CONTENTS.
+
+NOTES:--Page
+ Stray Notes on Cunningham's London. 289
+ Satirical Song upon Villiers Duke of Buckingham, by Dr. Rimbault. 291
+ Baker's Notes on Author of "Whole Duty of Man," by Rev. J.E.B. Mayor. 292
+ Mistake about George Wither, by Dr. Rimbault. 293
+ Useful _v._ Useless Learning. 293
+ Minor Notes:--Numerals--Junius and Sir P. Francis--Jews under the
+ Commonwealth--"Is any thing but," &c.--Fastitocalon. 294
+
+QUERIES:--
+ Bishop Cosin's Conference. 295
+ Engleman's "Bibliotheca Scriptorum Classicorum," by Professor De
+ Morgan. 296
+ Minor Queries:--Portrait of Sir P. Sidney--Confession--Scotch
+ Prisoners at Worcester--Adamson's Edward II.--Sir Thomas
+ Moore--Dr. E. Cleaver--Gwyan's London--Coronet--Cinderella--Judas'
+ Bell--Dozen of Bread--Kings Skuggsia--Coins of
+ Gandophares--Satirical Medals. 296
+
+REPLIES:--
+ Gaudentio di Lucca. 298
+ On a Passage in the Tempest, by J. Payne Collier. 299
+ Gray's Elegy. 300
+ Bishops and their Precedence. 301
+ Replies to Minor Queries:--Leicester and the reputed Poisoners of
+ his Time--What is the correct Prefix of Mayors--Marks of Cadency. 302
+
+MISCELLANEOUS:--
+ Notes on Books, Sales, Catalogues, &c. 303
+ Books and Odd Volumes Wanted. 303
+ Notices to Correspondents. 303
+ Advertisments. 304
+
+ * * * * *
+
+
+NOTES.
+
+STRAY NOTES ON CUNNINGHAM'S LONDON.
+
+The following notes are so trivial, that I should have scrupled to send
+them on any other ground than that so well-conceived and
+labouriously-executed a work should have its most minute and unimportant
+details as correct as possible. This, in such a work, can only be
+effected by each reader pointing out the circumstances that he has
+reason to believe are not quite correctly or completely given in it.
+
+Page 24. _Astronomical Society._--The library has been recently
+augmented by the incorporation with it of the books and documents (as
+well as the members) of the _Mathematical Society of London_
+(Spitalfields). It contains the most complete collection of the English
+mathematical works of the last century known to exist. A friend, who has
+examined them with some care, specifies particularly some of the tracts
+published in the controversy raised by Bishop Berkeley respecting "the
+ghosts of departed quantities," of which he did before know the
+existence.
+
+The instruments to which Mr. Cunningham refers as bequeathed to the
+Society, are not used there, nor yet allowed to lie unused. They are
+placed in the care of active practical observers, according as the
+special character of the instruments and the special subjects to which
+each observer more immediately devotes his attention, shall render the
+assignment of the instrument expedient. The instruments, however, still
+remain the property of the Society.
+
+P. 37. _Bath House._--Date omitted.
+
+P. 143.--Evan's Hotel, Covent Garden, is described as having been once
+the residence of "James West, the great collector of books, &c., and
+_President of the Royal Society_." There has certainly never been a
+President, or even a Secretary, of that name. However, it is just
+possible that there might have been a Vice-president so named (as these
+are chosen by the President from the members of the council, and the
+council has not always been composed of men of science): but even this
+is somewhat doubtful.
+
+P. 143. _Covent Garden Theatre._--No future account of this theatre will
+be complete without the facts connected with the ill-starred Delafield;
+just as, into the Olympic, the history of the defaulter Watts, of the
+Globe Assurance Office, must also enter.
+
+P. 143. near top of col. 2. "Heigho! says Kemble."--Before this period,
+a variation of the _rigmarole_ upon which this is founded had become
+poplular, from the humour of Liston's singing at Sadler's Wells. I have
+a copy of the music and the words; altogether identical with those in
+the music. Of these, with other matters connected with the {290} amorous
+frog, I shall have something more to say hereafter. This notice is to be
+considered incidental, rather than as referring expressly to Mr.
+Cunningham's valuable book.
+
+P. 153. _Deans Yard, Westminster._--Several of the annual budgets of
+abuse, obscenity, and impudent imposture, bearing on their title-pages
+various names, but written by "John Gadbury, Student in Physic and
+Astrology," were dated from "my house, Brick Court, Dean's Yard,
+Westminster;" or this slightly varied, occasionally being, "Brick Court,
+_near_ the Dean's Yard," &c. I have not seen a complete series of
+Gadbury's _Almanacks_, but those I refer to range from 1688 to 1694
+(incomplete). His burial in St. Margaret's, Westminster, in 1704, is
+noticed by Mr. Cunningham, at p. 313. As brick was then only used in the
+more costly class of domestic buildings, this would seem to indicate
+that _prophecy_ was then a lucrative trade; and that the successor and
+pupil of the "arch-rogue, William Lilly" was quite as fortunate in his
+speculations as his master had been. It is a truth as old as society
+itself, that "knaves grow rich while honest men starve." Whilst Gadbury
+was "wallowing in plenty," the author of _Hudibras_ was perishing for
+want of a crust!
+
+P. 153. _Denzil Street._--Here, about the middle of the street, on the
+south side, lived Theophilus Holdred, a jobbing watchmaker, whose name
+will always hold a place in one department of mathematical history. He
+discovered a method of approximating to the roots of numerical
+equations, of considerable ingenuity. He, however, lost in his day and
+generation the reputation that was really due to him for it, by his
+laying claim to more than he had effected, and seeking to deprive other
+and more gifted men of the reputation due to a more perfect solution of
+the same problem. He was, indeed, brought before the public as the tool
+of a faction; and, as the tools of faction generally are, he was
+sacrificed by his own supporters when he was no longer of any use to
+them.
+
+I once called upon him, in company with Professor Leyburn, of the Royal
+Military College, but I forget whether in 1829 or 1830. We found him at
+his bench--a plain, elderly, and heavy-looking personage. He seemed to
+have become "shy" of our class, and some time and some address were
+requisite to get him to speak with any freedom: but ultimately we placed
+him at his ease, and he spoke freely. We left him with the conviction
+that he was the _bonâ fide_ discoverer of his own method; and that he
+had no distinct conception, even then, of the principle of the methods
+which he had been led by his friends to claim, of having _also_
+discovered _Horner's_ process before Horner himself had published it. He
+did not (ten years after the publication of Horner's method) even then
+understand it. He understood his own perfectly, and I have not the
+slightest doubt of the correctness of his own statement, of its having
+been discovered by him fifty years before.
+
+P. 166. _Dulwich Gallery._--This is amongst the unfortunate consequences
+of taking lists upon trust. Poor Tom Hurst[1] has not been in the
+churchyard these last eight years--except the three last in his grave.
+The last five years of his life were spent in a comfortable asylum, as
+"a poor brother of the Charterhouse." He was one of the victims of the
+"panic of 1825;" and though the spirit of speculation never left him, he
+always failed to recover his position. He is referred to here, however,
+to call Mr. Cunningham's attention to the necessity, in a _Hand-book_
+especially, of referring his readers correctly to the places at which
+_tickets_ are to be obtained for any purpose whatever. It discourages
+the visitor to London when he is thus "sent upon a fool's errand;" and
+the Cockney himself is not in quite so good a humour with the author for
+being sent a few steps out of his way.
+
+P. 190. _Rogers_--a Cockney by inference. I {291} should like to see
+this more decidedly established. I am aware that it is distinctly so
+stated by Chambers and by Wilkinson; but a remark once made to me by
+Mrs. Glendinning (the wife of Glendinning, the printer, of Hatton
+Garden) still leads me to press the inquiry.
+
+P. 191.--_The Free Trade Club_ was dissolved before the publication of
+this edition of the _Handbook_.
+
+P. 192.--And to Sir John Herschel, on his return from the Cape of Good
+Hope.
+
+P. 210. _Royal Society._--From a letter of Dr. Charles Hutton, in the
+_Newcastle Magazine_ (vol. i. 2nd series), it appears that at the time
+of Dr. Dodd's execution the Fellows were in the habit of adjourning,
+after the meetings, to Slaughter's Coffee House, "to eat oysters," &c.
+The celebrated John Hunter, who had attempted to resuscitate the
+ill-fated Doctor, was one of them. "The Royal Society Club" was
+instituted by Sir Joseph Banks.
+
+P. 221. _Hanover Square._--Blank date.
+
+P. 337. _Millbank Prison._--It was designed, not by "Jeremy Bentham,"
+but by his brother, the great mechanist, Sir Samuel Bentham. In passing,
+it may be remarked that the Royal Military Academy, Woolwich, is
+constructed on the same principle, and, as was stated in the _Mechanics'
+Magazine_, on authority, a year or two ago, by the same engineer.
+General rumour has, however, attributed the design to his gracious
+Majesty George III; and its being so closely in keeping with the known
+spirit of _espionage_ of that monarch certainly gave countenance to the
+rumour. It may be as well to state, however, that, so designed and so
+built, it has never yet been so used.
+
+P. 428.--_Benbow_, not a native of Wapping, but of Shrewsbury. A life of
+him was published nearly forty years ago, by that veteran of local and
+county history, Mr. Charles Hulbert, in the _Salopian Magazine_.
+
+P. 499. _Whitfield._--Certainly not the founder of the Methodists, in
+the ordinary or recognised acceptation of the term. John Wesley was at
+the head of that movement from the very first, and George Whitfield and
+Charles Wesley were altogether subordinate to him. Wesley and Whitfield
+parted company on the ground of Arminianism _versus_ Calvinism. For a
+while the two sects kept the titles of "Arminian Methodists" and
+"Calvinistic Methodists." The latter made but little ground afterwards,
+and the distinctive adjective was dropped by the Wesleyans when the
+Whitfieldites had ceased to be a prominent body.
+
+P. 515. _Doctor Dodd._--The great interest excited in favour of a
+commutation of his sentence, led to the belief at the time, that his
+life had not been really sacrificed. Many plausible stories respecting
+the Doctor having been subsequently seen alive, were current; and as
+they may possibly in some future age be revived, and again pass into
+general currency, it may be as well to state that the most positive
+evidence to the contrary exists, in a letter of Dr. Hutton's before
+referred to. The _attempt to resuscitate him was actually made_, by a no
+less distinguished surgeon than John Hunter. He seemed then to attribute
+the failure to his having _received the body too late_. Wonderful
+effects were at that time expected to result from the discovery of
+galvanism; but it would have been wonderful indeed if any restoration
+had taken place after more than two hours of suspended animation. John
+Hunter, according to the account, does not seem to have been very
+communicative on the subject, even to his philosophical friends at
+Slaughter's Oyster Rooms.
+
+T.S.D.
+
+Shooter's Hill.
+
+[Footnote 1: It may not be out of place here to mention one fine feature
+in the character of "Tom Hurst;" his deep reverence for men of ability,
+whether in literature, science, or art. Take one instance:
+
+
+Fourteen or fifteen years ago, I called one morning at his place of
+business (then 65. St. Paul's Church Yard, which has been subsequently
+absorbed into the "Religious Tract Depository"); and, as was my custom,
+I walked through the shop to his private room. He was "not in;" but a
+gentleman, who first looked at me and then at a portrait of me on the
+wall, accosted me by my surname as familiarly as an intimate
+acquaintance of twenty years would have done. He and Hurst, it appeared,
+had been speaking of me, suggested by the picture, before Hurst went
+out. The familiar stranger did not keep me long in suspense--he
+intimated that I had "probably heard our friend speak of Ben Haydon." Of
+course I had; and we soon got into an easy chat. Hurst was naturally a
+common subject with us. Amongst the remarks he made were the following,
+and in almost the words:--
+
+"When my troubles came on, I owed Hurst a large sum of money; and the
+circumstances under which I became his debtor rendered this peculiarly a
+debt of honour. He lent it me when he could ill spare it; yet he is the
+only one of all my creditors who has not in one way or other persecuted
+me to the present hour. When he first knew of my wreck, he called upon
+me--_not to reproach but to encourage me_--and he would not leave me
+till he felt sure that he had changed the moody current of my thoughts.
+If there be any change in him since then, it is in his increased
+kindness of manner and his assiduity to serve me. He is now gone out to
+try to sell 'a bit of daub' for me."
+
+Hurst came in, and this conversation dropped; but it had been well had
+Hurst been by his side on the day his last picture was opened to view at
+the Egyptian Hall. The catastrophe of that night might have been
+averted, notwithstanding Mr. Barnum and his Tom Thumb show in the
+adjoining room.]
+
+ * * * * *
+
+SATIRICAL SONG UPON GEORGE VILLIERS, DUKE OF BUCKINGHAM.
+
+In turning over some old bundles of papers of the early part of the
+seventeenth century, I met with the following satirical effusion upon
+"James's infamous prime minister," George Villiers, Duke of Buckingham.
+As an echo of the popular feelings of the people at the time it was
+written, it merits preservation; and although I have seen other
+manuscript copies of the ballad, it has never yet, as far as I can
+learn, appeared in print.
+
+It appears to be a parody or paraphrase of a well-known ballad of the
+period, the burden of which attracted the notice of the satirist. It
+afterwards became a common vehicle of derision during the civil war, as
+may be seen by turning over the pages of the collection entitled _Rump
+Songs_, and the folio volumes of the king's pamphlets.
+
+The _original_ of these parodies has hitherto eluded my researches. It
+is not among the Pepysian, Roxburghe, Wood, or Douce ballads, but
+perhaps some of your readers may be able to point it out in some public
+or private collection.
+
+ "Come heare, Lady Muses, and help mee to sing,
+ Come love mee where I lay;
+ Of a duke that deserves to be made a king--
+ The cleane contrary way,
+ O the cleane contrary way.
+
+ "Our Buckingham Duke is the man that I meane,
+ Come love mee where I lay;
+ On his shoulders the weale of the kingdome doth leane--
+ The cleane contrary way,
+ O the cleane contrary way.
+
+ "O happiest kingdome that ever was kind,
+ Come love mee where I lay;
+ And happie the king that hath such a friend--
+ The cleane contrary way,
+ O the cleane contrary way. {292}
+
+ "Needs must I extoll his worth and his blood--
+ Come love mee where I lay;
+ And his sweet disposition soe milde and soe good--
+ The cleane contrary way,
+ O the cleane contrary way.
+
+ "Those innocent smiles that embelish his face,
+ Come love mee where I lay;
+ Who sees them not tokens of goodness and grace--
+ The cleane contrary way,
+ O the cleane contrary way.
+
+ "And what other scholler could ever arise,
+ Come love mee where I lay;
+ From a master that was soe sincere and wise--
+ The cleane contrary way,
+ O the cleane contrary way.
+
+ "Who is hee could now from his grave but ascend,
+ Come love mee where I lay;
+ Would surely the truth of his service commend--
+ The cleane contrary way,
+ O the cleane contrary way.
+
+ "The king understands how he honors his place,
+ Come love me where I lay;
+ Which is to his majestie noe little grace--
+ The cleane contrary way,
+ O the cleane contrary way.
+
+ "And therefore the government justly hath hee,
+ Come love mee where I lay;
+ Of horse for the land, and shipps for the sea--
+ The cleane contrary way,
+ O the cleane contrary way.
+
+ "What, though our fleet be our enemies debtor,
+ Come love mee where I lay;
+ Wee brav'd them once, and wee'l brave them better--
+ The cleane contrary way,
+ O the cleane contrary way.
+
+ "And should they land heere they should bee disjointed,
+ Come love mee where I lay;
+ And find both our horse and men bravely appointed--
+ The cleane contrary way,
+ O the cleane contrary way.
+
+ "Then let us sing all of this nobel duke's praise,
+ Come love mee where I lay;
+ And pray for the length of his life and his daies--
+ The cleane contrary way,
+ O the cleane contrary way.
+
+ "And when that death shall close up his eyes,
+ Come love mee where I lay;
+ God take him up into the skies--
+ The cleane contrary way,
+ O the cleane contrary way."
+
+EDWARD F. RIMBAULT.
+
+ * * * * *
+
+"WHOLE DUTY OF MAN," AUTHOR OF.
+
+(From Baker's MSS, vol. xxxv. p. 469-470. Cambridge University Library.)
+
+ "Octo'r 31. 1698. Mr. Thomas Caulton, Vicar of Worksop, &c. [as
+ in the note p. xiii. to the editor's Preface, ed. 1842, with
+ unimportant variations, such as _Madam Frances Heathcote_, where
+ the printed copy has _Mrs. Heathcote_; Baker reads _Madam Ayre
+ of Rampton after dinner took_, where the printed copy has, _Mrs.
+ Eyre_. After _was dead_, follows in Baker,] and that in that
+ Month she had buried her Husband and severall Relations, but
+ that her comfort was, that by her Monthly Sacraments she
+ participated still with them in the Communion of Saints.
+
+ "Then she went to her Closet, and fetched out a Manuscript, w'ch
+ she said was the original of the _Whole Duty of Man_, tied
+ together and stitched, in 8'vo, like Sermon notes. She untied
+ it, saying, it was Dr. Fell's Correction and that the Author was
+ the Lady Packington (her Mother), in whose hand it was written.
+
+ "To prove this, the s'd Mr. Caulton further added that she said,
+ she had shewn it to Dr. Covell, Master of Christ's College[2] in
+ Cambridge, Dr. Stamford, Preb. of York, and Mr. Banks the
+ present Incumbent of the Great Church in Hull. She added,
+ withall, that _The Decay of Christian Piety_ was hers (The Lady
+ Packington's) also, but disowned any of the rest to be her
+ Mother's.
+
+ "This is a true Copy of what I wrote, from Mr. Caulton's Mouth,
+ two days before his Decease.
+
+ "Witness my hand,
+
+ "Nov. 15. 98.
+
+ "JOHN HEWYT."
+
+ "Bp. Fell tells us, that all these Tracts were written by the
+ excellent Author (whom he makes to be one and the same person)
+ at severall times, as y'e exigence of the Church, and the
+ benefit of soules directed y'r composures; and that he (the
+ Author) did likewise publish them apart, in the same order as
+ they were made. The last, it seems (w'ch is _The Lively
+ Oracles_), came out in 1678, the very year Dr. Woodhead died.
+ Had the Author liv'd longer, we should have had his Tract _Of
+ the Government of the Thoughts_, a work he had undertaken; and
+ certainly (as Bp. Fell hath told us), had this work been
+ finished, 'twould have equall'd, if not excelled, whatever that
+ inimitable hand had formerly wrote. Withall it may be observ'd,
+ that the Author of these Tracts speaks of the great Pestilence,
+ and of the great Fire of London, both w'ch happen'd after the
+ Restoration, whereas Bp. Chappell died in 1649. And further, in
+ sect. vii. of the _Lively Oracles_, n. 2., are these words, w'ch
+ I think cannot agree to Bp. Chappell [and less to Mr. Woodhead].
+ _I would not be hasty in charging Idolatry upon the Church of
+ Rome, or all in her Communion; but that their Image-Worship is a
+ most futall snare, in w'ch vast numbers of unhappy Souls are
+ taken, no Man can doubt, who hath with any Regard travailed in
+ Popish Countries: I myself, and thousands of others, whom the
+ late troubles, or other occasions, sent abroad, are, and have
+ been witnesses thereof_. {293} These words seem to have been
+ spoke by one that had been at Rome, and was forced into those
+ Countries after the troubles broke out here. But as for
+ Chappell, he never was at Rome, nor in any of those Countries.
+
+ "As for Archbp. Stern, no Man will believe him to have any just
+ Title to any of these Tracts. [The last Passage concerning
+ idolatry, will not agree with Mr. Woodhead, nor the rest with
+ Lady Packington.]
+
+ "In a letter from Mr. Hearne, dat. Oxon, Mar. 27, 1733, said by
+ Dr. Clavering, Bp. of Petr. to be wrote by one Mr. Basket, a
+ Clergyman of Worcestershire. See Dr. Hamond's _Letters_
+ published by Mr. Peck, et ultra Quære."
+
+On so disputed a point as the authorship of the _Whole Duty of Man_,
+your readers will probably welcome any discussion by one so competent to
+form an opinion in such matters as Hearne.
+
+The letter above given was unknown to the editor of Mr. Pickering's
+edition.
+
+J.E.B. MAYOR.
+
+Marlborough College.
+
+[Footnote 2: The printed copy has _Trinity_ College.]
+
+ * * * * *
+
+MISTAKE ABOUT GEORGE WITHER.
+
+In Campbell's _Notices of the British Poets_ (edit. 1848 p. 234.) is the
+following, passage from the short memoir of George Wither:--
+
+ "He was even afraid of being put to some mechanical trade, when
+ he contrived to get to London, and with great simplicity had
+ proposed to try his fortune at court. To his astonishment,
+ however, he found that it was necessary to flatter in order to
+ be a courtier. To show his independence, he therefore wrote his
+ _Abuses Whipt and Stript_, and, instead of rising at court, was
+ committed for some months to the Marshalsea."
+
+The author adds a note to this passage, to which Mr. Peter Cunningham
+(the editor of the edition to which I refer) appends the remark inclosed
+between brackets:--
+
+ "He was imprisoned for his _Abuses Whipt and Stript_; yet this
+ could not have been his first offence, as an allusion is made to
+ a former accusation. [It was for _The Scourge_ (1615) that his
+ first known imprisonment took place.]"
+
+I cannot discover upon any authority sufficient ground for Mr.
+Campbell's note resecting a _former_ accusation against Wither. He was
+undoubtedly imprisoned for his _Abuses Whipt and Stript_, which first
+appeared in print in 1613, but I do not think an _earlier_ offence can
+be proved against him. It has been supposed, upon the authority of a
+passage in the _Warning Piece to London_, that the first edition of this
+curious work appeared in 1611; but I am inclined to think that the
+lines,--
+
+ "In sixteen hundred ten and one,
+ I notice took of public crimes,"
+
+refers to the period at which the "Satirical Essays" were _composed_.
+Mr. Willmott, however (_Lives of the Sacred Poets_, p. 72.), thinks that
+they point to an earlier publication. But it is not likely that Wither
+would so soon again have committed himself by the publication of the
+_Abuses_ in 1613, if he had suffered for his "liberty of speech" so
+shortly before.
+
+Mr. Cunningham's addition to Mr. Campbell's note is incorrect. The
+_Scourge_ is part of the _Abuses Whipt and Stript_ printed in 1613 (a
+copy of which is now before me), to which it forms a postscript. Wood,
+who had never seen it, speaks of it as a _separate_ publication; but Mr.
+Willmott has corrected this error, although he had only the means of
+referring to the edition of the _Abuses_ printed in 1615. Mr.
+Cunningham's note, that Wither was imprisoned for the _Scourge_ in 1615,
+is a mistake; made, probably, by a too hasty perusal of Mr. Willmott's
+charming little volume on our elder sacred poets.
+
+EDWARD F. RIMBAULT.
+
+ * * * * *
+
+USEFUL VERSUS USELESS LEARNING
+
+A single and practical plan for the formation of a complete and useful
+library and _respository_ of _universal_ literary knowledge.
+
+The design which I propose in the following few lines, is one which I
+should imagine nearly all the more learned and literary of your readers
+would _wish_ to see _already in existence_ and when I show that it might
+be effected _with very little trouble and expense_ (indeed _no_ trouble
+but such as would be a _pleasure_ to those interested in the work), and
+that the greatest advantage would follow from it,--I hope that it may
+meet with favourable consideration from some of the numerous, able, and
+influential readers and correspondents of your journal.
+
+I am the more induced to hope this from the fact of such a wish having
+been partially expressed by some of your contributors, and the excellent
+leading articles of Nos. 1 and 2.
+
+What I propose is simply this: the SYSTEMATIC ARRANGEMENT of _all_ the
+existing literary knowledge in the world that is considered _of value_
+by those best qualified to judge, disposed in such a manner as to answer
+these two purposes: 1st, to give a general connected and classified
+_view_ of the literary treasures of the whole world, beginning from the
+most ancient in each language and department (including only what is
+valuable in each); and, 2dly, to afford the greatest possible _facility_
+(by means of arrangement, references and _indexes_) to every inquirer
+for finding _at once_ the information he is in search of, if it is to be
+found _anywhere_ by looking for it.
+
+There are two ways in which this work might be accomplished, both of
+which were desirable, though even one only would be much better than
+none.
+
+The first and most complete is, to make a real COLLECTION of all those
+works, arranged in the {294} most perfect systematic order; and, while
+doing so, to make at the same time a corresponding classified
+_Catalogue_.
+
+The chief (and almost the only) _difficulty_ in the way of this would
+be, to find a _room_ (or suite of rooms) to contain such a library and
+repository; but such would probably be found if sought.
+
+The other way in which this object might be attained is by the formation
+of a simple CATALOGUE in the same order, such as does already exist and
+lies open for public use (though only in manuscript, and not so
+accurately classified as might be) in the noble library of the Dublin
+University.
+
+This plan would be _far easier_ than (besides forming the best possible
+_basis_ for) that so urgently advocated by MR. BOLTON CORNEY (Vol. i.
+pp. 9, 42, 43.).
+
+Of course so extensive a design would require to be distributed among
+many hundred persons; but so does any great work: while, by each
+individual undertaking that department in which he is most interested
+and most experienced, the whole might be accomplished easily and
+pleasantly.
+
+The great fault of antiquarians is, that they are constantly _beginning
+at the wrong end_: they fix on some one piece of information that they
+want to get, and devote a world of labour to hunting about in all
+directions for anything bearing on the subject; whereas the rational way
+obviously is, to have the whole existing mass of (valuable) knowledge
+_classified_, and then the inquirer would know _where_ to look for his
+purpose.
+
+Of course there will always remain much knowledge of a miscellaneous and
+irregular nature which is picked up by accident, and does not come
+within the scope of the present design; but this is generally of a
+trifling and fugitive kind, and does not at all controvert the principle
+above laid down.
+
+In conclusion, I have worked out a tolerably complete series of
+arrangements for the above design, showing its practicability as well as
+usefulness, which will be much at the service of any one who can use
+them for the furtherance of that object.
+
+W. D.
+
+ * * * * *
+
+MINOR NOTES.
+
+_Numerals._--For the old Indian forms, see Prinsep's _Journal Asiatic
+Soc. Bengal_, 1838, p. 348. The prospectus of _Brugsh, Numerorum apud
+Egyptios Demoticorum Doctrina_, Berlin, promises to give from papyri and
+inscriptions not only the figures, but the forms of operation. Probably
+the system assumed its present form by the meeting of the Indian and
+Egyptian traders at some emporium near the mouth of the Indus. Peacock
+seems to give undue weight to the fact, that the Tibetans have a copious
+nomenclature for high numbers: their arithmetic, doubtless, came with
+their alphabet, and the Buddhist legends from India.
+
+F.Q.
+
+
+_Junnius and Sir Philip Francis._--A few years ago, an aged intelligent
+person named Garner was living at Belgrave, near Leicester. I have heard
+him say that, when he was a farm bailiff to Lord Thanet, at Sevenoaks,
+in Kent, Sir Philip Francis was a frequent visitor there, and had a
+private room set apart for literary occupation. On one occasion, when he
+(Mr. Garner) was riding over the farm with Sir Philip Francis, the
+former alluded to one of the replies to Junius, by a clergyman who had
+been the subject of the "Great Unknown's" anonymous attacks, adding,
+"They say, Sir Philip, you are Junius." Sir Philip did not deny that he
+was the man, but simply smiled at the remark. This, and other
+circumstances coupled with the fact of Sir Philip's frequent visits to
+the house of so noted a politician as Lord Thanet, rendered Mr. Garner a
+firm believer in the identity of Sir Philip and Junius to the end of his
+days.
+
+JAYTEE.
+
+
+_Jews under the Commonwealth_ (Vol. i., pp. 401. 474.; vol ii., p.
+25.).--There is a confirmation of the story of the Jews being in treaty
+for St. Paul's and the Oxford Library in a passage in Carte's _Letters_,
+i. 276, April 2, 1649:--
+
+ "They are about demolishing and selling cathedral churches. I
+ hear Norwich is designed already, and that the Jews proffer
+ 600,000l. for Paul's and Oxford Library, and may have them for
+ 200,000l. more."
+
+CH.
+
+
+"_Is anything but," &c._--As your work seems adapted, amongst other
+subjects, to check the introduction into our language of undesirable
+words, phrases, and forms of speech, I would call the attention of your
+readers to the modern phrases, "is anything but," and the like, which
+have lately crept into use, and will be found, in many (otherwise)
+well-written books.
+
+I read the phrase "is anything but," for the first time, in Napier's
+_Peninsular War_; where it struck me as being so much beneath the
+dignity of historical composition, and at the same time asserting an
+impossibility, that I meditated calling the author's attention to it.
+The not unfrequent use of the same phrase by other writers, since that
+time, has by no means reconciled me to its use.
+
+In the _Edinburgh Review_ for January last (1850) I find the following
+sentence:--"But as pains have been taken to fix the blame _upon any one
+except_ the parties culpable;" and in the July number of the same
+_Review_ (p. 90.) occurs the sentence, "_any impulse rather than_ that of
+patriotism," &c.
+
+Now, a "thing," or "person," or "impulse,"--though it may not be the
+"thing," or "person," or "impulse" charged as the agent,--must yet be
+some _certain_ and _specific_ thing, or party, or impulse, {295} if
+existing as an agent at all in the matter; and cannot be "_any_ thing,"
+or "_any_ party," or "_any_ impulse," in the _indefinite_ sense intended
+in these phrases. Moreover, there seems no difficulty in expressing, in
+a simple and direct manner, that the agent was a very different, or
+opposite, or dissimilar "thing," or "person," or "impulse" from that
+supposed.
+
+I wish some persons of competent authority in the science of our
+language (and many such there are who write in your pages) would take up
+this subject, with a view to preserve the purity of it; and would also,
+for the future, exercise a watchful vigilance over the use, for the
+_first_ time, of any incorrect, or low words or phrases, in composition;
+and so endeavour to confine them to the vulgar, or to those who ape the
+vulgar in their style.
+
+P.H.F.
+
+
+_Fastitocalon._--_Fastitocalon. Cod. Exon._ fol. 96. b. p. 360. 18. read
+[Greek: Aspido ... chelonae]. Tychsen, _Physiologus Syrus_, cap. xxx.:
+did the digamma get to Crediton by way of Cricklade?
+
+F.Q.
+
+ * * * * *
+
+
+QUERIES
+
+BISHOP COSIN'S CONFERENCE.
+
+Basire in his _Dead Man's Real Speech_ (pp. 59, 60.), amongst other
+"notable instances" of Bishop Cosin's zeal and constancy in defence of
+the Church of England, mentions
+
+ "A solemn conference both by word and writing betwixt him and
+ the Prior of the English Benedictines at Paris, supposed to be
+ Robinson. The argument was concerning the validity of the
+ ordination of our priests, &c., in the Church of England. The
+ issue was, our Doctor had the better so far, that he could never
+ get from the Prior any reply to his last answer. This conference
+ was undertaken to fix a person of honour then wavering about
+ that point; the sum of which conference (as I am informed), was
+ written by Dr. Cosin to Dr. Morley, the now Right Reverend Lord
+ Bishop of Winchester, in two letters bearing date June 11, July
+ 11, 1645."
+
+The substance of this conference has been preserved among the Smith
+Manuscripts in the Bodleian Library; but it is not in the form of
+letters to Dr. Morley. Vol. xl. of this valuable collection of
+manuscripts contains (as described in Smith's table of contents):--
+
+ 1. "Papers of Bp. Cosins in defence of the Ordination of the
+ Church of England against father Prior.
+
+ "The first of these is Bp. Cosin's Review of the Father's
+ Letter, &c. [the title-page is placed at p. 77.]
+
+ "Then follows a letter (which is indeed the Bishop's first
+ paper, and should be put first) from Bishop Cosin to the Father.
+
+ "After that the Father's Answer to Bishop Cosin's Review at p.
+ 81.
+
+ "Then come two other papers about the validity of our
+ Ordination, with a preface concerning the occasion, p. 89."
+
+ 2. "Then, p. 101., A Letter from a _Rom. Cath._ to a Lady about
+ communicating in one kind,--with Bishop Cosin's Answer."
+
+ 3. "Lastly, in p. 123., is A Letter of Bp. Cosin's to Dr.
+ Collins concerning the Sabbath."
+
+The order in which the papers under the first head, about our English
+ordination, should fall, appears to be as follows:--
+
+1. There is a note attached to p. 65., evidently written by Dr. Tho.
+Smith himself in the following words:
+
+ "Transcript of several papers of Bishop Cosin's sent to me by
+ Dr. J. Smith, Prebendary of Durham.--T.S."
+
+2. At p. 77. the title-page is given thus:
+
+ "A Review of a Letter sent from F.P.R. to a Lady (whom he would
+ have persuaded to the Rom. party) in Opposition to a former
+ paper given him for the defence of the Church of England in the
+ Ordination of Priests."
+
+To this are appended the respective forms of ordering priests used in
+the Church of England and in the Roman Church.
+
+3. Then, at p. 89., we have the "occasion of this ... Discourse
+concerning the Ordination of Priests," &c. This is a kind of preface,
+which contains the first paper that was given to the Prior, dated June
+14, 1645; also another paper, bearing date July 11, 1645, but ending
+abruptly in the middle of a sentence, and having written below it
+(probably in Dr. J. Smith's hand) the following note:
+
+ "The rest of this is not yet found, and that which is written
+ thus far is not in the Bishop's own hand, but the copy is very
+ fair."
+
+However, this second paper (ending thus abruptly) appears to be no more
+than the first draft of a long letter from Cosin to the Prior, which
+commences at p. 65. of this MS., and which is dated "from the Court of
+S. Germains, July 11, 1645;" for not only does this letter bear the same
+_date_ as the before-mentioned fragment, but it begins by complaining of
+the tone of expression in a letter evidently received from the Prior
+after the draft had been prepared, but before it was sent off; and it
+concludes with the following note appended as a postscript:
+
+ "Sir,
+
+ "The enclosed (most of it) was prepared for you a fortnight
+ since; but now (upon the occasion given by your letter) you have
+ it with some advantage from
+
+ "Your servt., J.C.
+
+ "I desire the fav"
+
+ "S. Germ. July 12."
+
+4. The most important part of this MS., however, is contained in the
+long letter or treatise {296} placed first in the volume, and bearing
+for its title, "A View of F.P.'s Answer to the First Paper."
+
+This is dated from S. Germains, July 25, 1645 and would appear to be
+Cosin's last letter. But, if it be really so, Basire must, I think, be
+in error, when he says, "Our Doctor ... could never get from the Prior
+any reply to his last answer." For at p. 81. of the MS. there is a reply
+to the above "Review of a Letter sent by F.R. to a Lady," &c. which,
+though copied without either date or signature, was evidently written by
+the Prior, whilst it professes to be a reply to a treatise closely
+answering to Cosin's letter of July 25, but which letter the writer did
+not receive (as he states) before the 26th of September.
+
+I wish yet further to take notice, that Dr. Tho. Smith, in His _Vitæ_
+(Lond. 1707, præf. pp. vii, viii.), refers to these manuscripts in the
+following satisfactory manner:--
+
+ "Cum, post mortem D. Cosini, de pretio et valore schedarum, quas
+ reliquit, hæredibus non satis constaret, ... auspieatò tandem
+ devenit, ut favore, beneficio, et perquam insigni humanitate
+ reverendi et doctissimi viri, D. Joannis Smith, Sacræ Theologiæ
+ Professoris Ecclesiæ Dunelmensis Præbendarii, quorum frequens
+ hac de re commercium literarum, occasione data, (opportunè
+ intercedente prænobili et reverendo, D. Georgio Whelero, equite
+ aurato, et Ecclesiæ Anglicanæ Presbytero, ejusdem quoque
+ Ecclesiæ Cathedralis Prebendario), habui, duos libellos (tanquam
+ prætiosas tabulas ab isthoc infami naufragio servatas) a D.
+ Cosino, dum in Galliâ exularet, Anglieè conscriptos jam
+ possidieam: quarum unus _Vindicias Ordinatianum Ecclesieæ
+ Anglicanæ_ contra exceptiones et cavillationes cujusdem
+ Pontificii sacerdotis e gente nostra, alter _Responsionem ad
+ Epistolam_ nobili fæminæ Anglæ ab alio saccrdote _pro defensione
+ communionis sub unicâ specie administrandæ_ inscriptam,
+ complectitur," &c.
+
+I should still be glad to add to this long note the followng Queries:--
+
+1. Can any of your readers kindly inform me whether Cosin's two letters
+to Dr. Geo. Morley are still in existence, either in MS. or in print?
+
+2. Whether there be any fuller or more authentic account of the
+controversy than that in these MS. preserved by the care of Dr. Smith?
+
+3. Whether Cosin wrote any letter to the Prior _later_ than that of July
+25?
+
+4. Who was the _lady_ the Prior wished to seduce to the Roman party?
+
+5. Is there any other account of the controversy?
+
+J. SANSOM.
+
+ * * * * *
+
+ENGELMAN'S BIBILIOTHECA SCRIPTORUM CLASSICORUM.
+
+A little while ago, I ordered Engelman's _Bibliotheca Scriptoram
+Classicorum_, purporting to contain all such works published from 1700
+to 1846. It was furnished to my bookseller by a foreign bookseller in
+_London_ with an English title, having _his own_ name on it as
+publisher, and an invitation to purchase the books described in it _from
+him_. As the paper and type were German, I objected and received in
+consequence a new English title, with the same name upon it, and a
+_shorter_ invitation to purchase from him. I was captious enough to
+object even to this; and I then received a Leipzig title in German. But
+there still remains a difficulty: for this German title has also the
+name of a _Parisian_ bookseller upon it, _a la maison duquel on peut
+s'adresser, &c._ Now, as Engelman is a bookseller, and would probably
+not object to an order out of his own catalogue, of which he is both
+author and publisher, the preceding, circumstances naturally raise the
+following Queries:
+
+1. What is the real title-page of Engelman's _Catalogue_ 2. Is the
+Parisian house accredited by Engelman; or has the former served the
+latter as the London house has Served both? 3. Is it not desirable that
+literary men should set their faces very decidedly against all and every
+the slightest alteration in the genuine description of a book? 4. Would
+it not be desirable that every such alteration should forthwith be
+communicate to your paper?
+
+The English title-page omits the important fact, that the _Catalogue_
+begins at 1700, and describes it as containing _all_ editions, &c., up
+to 1846.
+
+A. DE MORGAN.
+
+September 24. 1850.
+
+ * * * * *
+
+MINOR QUERIES.
+
+_Portrait of Sir P. Sidney, by Paul Veronese._--In the letters of Sir P.
+Sidney which I found at Hamburg, and which were published by Pickering,
+1845, it is stated that a portrait of Sidney was painted by Paul
+Veronese, at Venice, for Herbert Languet. It would be very interesting
+to discover the existence of this picture.
+
+Languet had it with him at Prague, _framed_, as he asserts, and hung up
+in his room, in the year 1575. He remarks upon it, in one place, that it
+represented Sidney as too young (he was nineteen when it was taken); in
+another place he says that it has given him too sad an expression. I
+should add, that on Languet's death, his property passed into the hands
+of his friend Du Plessis.
+
+I am led to write to you on this subject, by having observed, a few days
+since, in the collection at Blenheim, two portraits by Paul Veronese, of
+persons unknown. There may be many such, and that of Sir Philip Sidney
+may yet be identified.
+
+STEUART A. PEARS.
+
+Harrow, Sept. 6.
+
+
+_Confession._--You would much oblige if you could discover the name of a
+Catholic priest, in {297} German history, who submitted to die rather
+than reveal a secret committed to him in confession?
+
+U.J.B.
+
+
+_Scotch Prisoners at Worcester._--In Mr. Walcott's _History of St.
+Margaret's Church, Westminster_, I find the following extract from
+church wardens' accounts:--
+
+ "1652. P'd to Thos. Wright for 67 loads of soyle laid on the
+ graves in Tothill Fields, wherein 1200 Scotch prisoners, taken
+ at the fight at Worcester, were buried; and for other pains
+ taken with his teeme of horses, about mending the Sanctuary
+ Highway, when Gen. Ireton was buried."
+
+I have taken the pains to verify this extract, and find the figures
+quite correctly given. I wish to put the Query: Is this abominable
+massacre in cold blood mentioned by any of our historians? But for such
+unexceptionable evidence, it would appear incredible.
+
+C.F.S.
+
+
+_Adamson's Reign of Edward II._--
+
+ "The Reigns of King Edward II., and so far of King Edward III.,
+ as relates to the Lives and Actions of Piers Gaveston, Hugh de
+ Spencer, and Roger Lord Mortimer, with Remarks thereon adapted
+ to the present Time: Humbly addressed to all his Majesty's
+ Subjects of Great Britain, &c., by _J. Adamson_. Printed for J.
+ Millar, near the Horse Guards, 1732, and sold by the Booksellers
+ of London and Westminster, price One Shilling."
+
+The above is the title-page of a little work of eighty-six pages in my
+possession, which I am inclined to think is scarce. It appears to be a
+defence of the Walpole administration from the attacks of the
+_Craftsman_, a periodical of the time, conducted by Amhurst, who was
+supported by Bolinbroke and Pulteney, the leaders of the opposition. Is
+anything known of _J. Adamson_, the author?
+
+H.A.E.
+
+
+_Sir Thomas Moore._--Can any of your readers give any account of Sir
+Thomas Moore, beyond what Victor tells of him in his _History_ of the
+Theatre, ii. p. 144., "that he was the author of an absurd tragedy
+called _Mangora_ (played in 1717), and was knighted by George I."
+
+In Pope's "Epistle to Arbuthnot," he writes--
+
+ "Arthur, whose giddy son leglects the laws."
+
+on which Warburton notes--
+
+ "_Arthur Moore, Esq._"
+
+Who was _Arthur Moore, Esq._? and who was the "giddy son?" Was the
+latter _James Moore Smith_ a gentleman whose family name was, I think,
+_Moore_, and who assumed (perhaps for a fortune) the additional name of
+_Smith_? This gentleman Pope seems to call indiscriminately _Moore_,
+_Moor_, and _More_: and when he says that his good nature towards the
+dunces was so great that he had even "rhymed for Moor" (Ib. v. 373.), I
+cannot but suspect that the Moor _for_ whom he had _rhymed_, was the
+_giddy son_ whom _Arthur_ accused him of seducing from the law to the
+Muses. There are many allusions to this Mr. James Moore Smith throughout
+Pope's satirical works, but all very obscure; and Warburton, though he
+appears to have known him, affords no explanation as to who or what he
+was. He was the author of a comedy called _The Rival Modes_.
+
+C.
+
+
+_Dr. E. Cleaver, Bishop of Cork._--I shall feel much obliged to any of
+your correspondents who will furnish me with the particulars of the
+consecration of Dr. Euseby Cleaver to the sees of Cork and Ross, in
+March, April, or May, 1789. Finding no record of the transaction in the
+Diocesan Registry of Cork, and not being able to trace it in any other
+part of _Ireland_, I am induced to believe that this consecration may
+have taken place in _England_; and shall be very glad to be correctly
+informed upon the point.
+
+H. COTTON.
+
+Thurles, Ireland.
+
+
+_Gwynn's London and Westminster._--Mr. Thomas Frederick Hunt, in his
+_Exemplars of Tudor Architecture_, 4to. London, 1830, in a note at p.
+23., alludes to _London and Westminster improved, by John Gywnn,
+London_, 1766, 4to., and has this remark:
+
+ "It is a singular fact, that in this work John Gwynn pointed out
+ almost all the designs for the improvement of London, which have
+ been _devised_ by the civil and military architects of the
+ present day."
+
+And Mr. Hunt concludes by observing,, that--
+
+ "This discovery was made by the _Literary Gazette_."
+
+Will you permit me, through the medium of your useful publication, to
+solicit information of the number and date of the _Literary Gazette_
+which recalled public attention to this very remarkable fact?
+
+§N.
+
+
+_Coronet._--In Newbold Church, in the county of Warwick, is a monument
+to the memory of Thomas Boughton of Lawford, and Elizabeth his wife,
+representing him in a suit of armour, with sword and spurs, _a coronet
+on his head_, and a bear at his feet, chained and muzzled. Query.--Can
+any of your readers give an accurate description of this coronet? Or can
+any of them mention instances of the monuments of esquires having
+similar coronets? The date of his death is not given: his wife died in
+the year 1454.
+
+Z.
+
+
+_Cinderella._--Referring to Vol. ii., p. 214., allow me to ask in what
+edition of Perrault's _Fairy Tales_ the misprint of _verre_ from _vair_
+first occurs? what is the date of their first publication, as well as
+that of the translation under the title of _Mother Goose's Tales_?
+whether Perrault was the originator of _Cinderella_, or from what source
+he drew the tale? {298} what, moreover, is the authority for identifying
+_sable_ with _vair_ for the employment of either in designating the
+highest rank of princesses?
+
+SANDVICENSIS.
+
+
+_Judas' Bell, Judas' Candle_ (Vol. i., pp. 195. 235. 357.).--Some time
+since I asked the meaning of a Judas' Bell, and your learned
+correspondent CEPHAS replied that it was only a bell so christened after
+St. Jude, the apostle. However, it may have been connected with the
+Judas' tapers, which, according, to the subjoined entries, were used
+with the Paschal candle at Easter. May I trust to his kindness to
+explain its purport?
+
+ "_Reading Parish Accompts_.
+
+ "1499. Itm. payed for making leng' Mr. Smyth's molde wt. a Judas
+ for the Pascall--vJd."
+
+ "_St. Giles' Parish Accompts_.
+
+ "A.D. 1514. Paid for making a Judas for Pascall iiijd."
+
+ "_Churchwardens' Accompts of S. Martin, Outwich_.
+
+ "1510. Paid to Randolf Merchaunt Wex Chandiler for the Pascall,
+ the tapers affore the Rode, the Cross Candelles, and Judas
+ Candelles--viiijs. iiijd."
+
+ "_St. Margaret's, Westminster._
+
+ "1524. Item payed for xij. Judacis to stand with the tapers--O
+ ijd. O"
+
+MACKENZIE WALCOTT, M.A., Oxon.
+
+
+_Dozen of Bread; Baker's Dozen._--In the _Chronicle of Queen Jane, and
+of Two Years of Queen Mary_, lately printed for the Camden Society
+(Appendix iv. p. 112.), it is stated that, amongst other particulars in
+the accounts of the Chamberlain of Colchester, at which place Mary was
+entertained on her way to London, there is:--"For xxxviii. _dozen of
+bread_, xxxixs." In the language of the county from which I write, "a
+dozen of bread" was (and I believe is yet) used to express either one
+loaf, value twelvepence or two loaves, value sixpence each: and even
+when the sizes and price of the loaves varied, it was used to express
+the larger loaf, or the two smaller loaves. A dozen of bread was also
+divided into six twopenny, or twelve penny loaves.
+
+But in the quotation above, thirty-eight dozen of bread are charged
+thirty-nine shillings; whereas the extra one shilling, cannot be divided
+into aliquot parts, so as to express the value of each of the
+thirty-eight dozen of bread.
+
+What was a dozen of bread in 1553?
+
+What is a _baker's dozen_, and why so called?
+
+P.H.F.
+
+
+_Kongs skuggsia._--Is anything, precise known of the date and origin of
+the Icelandic Kongs skuggsia.
+
+F.Q.
+
+
+_Coins of Gandophares._--Coins of Gandophares, an Indian prince, are
+described by Prinsep, _Jour. Asiatic Soc. Bengal_, and in Wilson's
+_Asiana_. The name is met with in the legends of St. Thomas can it be
+found elsewhere?
+
+F.Q.
+
+
+_Satirical Medals._--Is any printed account to be found of a very
+elaborately executed series of caricature medals relating to the
+revolution of 1688?
+
+F.Q.
+
+ * * * * *
+
+
+REPLIES.
+
+GAUDENTIO DI LUCCA.
+
+(Vol. ii., p. 247.)
+
+The work entitled _The Adventures of Sig. Gaudentio di Lucca_ was
+published at London in 1737, in 1 vol. 8vo. It purports to be a
+translation from the Italian, by E.T. Gent but this is a mere fiction.
+The work is evidently an English composition. It belongs to the class of
+_Voyages Imaginaires_, and its main object is to describe the
+institutions and manners of the Mezoranians, an Utopian community,
+supposed to exist in the centre of Africa. Sig. Gaudentio is able, by an
+accident, to visit this people, by the way of Egypt, and to return to
+Europe; he resides at Bologna, where he falls under the suspicion of the
+Inquisition, and having been brought before that tribunal, he describes
+his former life, and his adventures in the country of the Mezoranians.
+
+A second London edition of this work, of the date of 1748, is mentioned
+in the _Gentleman's Magazine_ for Jan. 1777. There is an edition in
+12mo., printed at Edinburgh, 1761. And there is another London edition,
+in 8vo., of the year 1786. Copies of the editions of 1737 and 1786 are
+in the British Museum.
+
+There are two French translations of the work. One is of the date 1746,
+under the title of _Mémoires de Gaudentio di Lucca_. The second, of
+1754, by M. Dupuy Demportes, speaks of the first having been made by an
+Englishman named _Milts_; but the person and name appear to be
+fictitious. The first translation is said by Barbier, _Dict. des
+Anonymes_, No. 11,409, to have been revised by the Chevalier de Saint
+Germain, who made additions to it of his own invention. The second
+translation is reprinted in the collection of _Voyages Imaginaires_,
+Amsterdam et Paris, 1787, tom. vi.
+
+An anonymous writer in the _Gent. Mag._ for Jan. 1777, vol. xlvii., p.
+13., speaking of Bishop Berkeley, says that "the _Adventures of Signor
+Gaudentio di Lucca_ have been generally attributed to him." The writer
+of the note added to the _Life of Berkeley_ in Kippis's _Biogr. Brit._,
+1780, vol. ii. p. 261., quotes this statement, and adds that the work is
+ascribed to him by the booksellers in their printed catalogues. This
+writer thinks that the authorship of Bp. Berkeley is consistent with the
+internal evidence of the book but he furnishes no positive testimony on
+the subject. {299}
+
+In a letter from Mr. J.C. Walker to Mr. Pinkerton, of 19 Jan., 1799
+(published in Pinkerton's _Literary Correspondence_, vol. ii., p. 41.),
+Lord Charlemont is referred to as believing that Gaudentio di Lucca is
+founded in fact; that Bishop Berkeley, when he was at Cairo, conversed
+with persons who had attended a caravan, and that he learned from them
+what he narrated in the account of Gaudentio. This passage is cited in
+Southey's _Common-place Book_, p. 204; but the work is manifestly
+fictitious, and it does not appear that Berkeley, though he twice
+visited the Continent, was ever out of Europe.
+
+The date of the publication of Gaudentio is quite consistent with the
+authorship of Berkeley, who died in 1753; but the notice in the
+_Gentleman's Magazine_ only proves the existence of a rumour to that
+effect; and the authentic _Life of Berkeley_, by Dr. Stock, chiefly
+drawn up from materials communicated by Dr. R. Berkeley, brother to the
+Bishop, and prefixed to the collected edition of his work (2 vols. 4to.
+Lond., 1784), makes no allusion to Gaudentio. There is nothing in the
+contents of this work which renders it likely that the authorship should
+have been carefully concealed by Bp. Berkeley and his family, if he had
+really been the author. The literary execution of Gaudentio is good; and
+it is probable that the speculative character of the work, and the fact
+that Berkeley had visited Italy, suggested the idea that he had composed
+it. The belief that Bishop Berkeley was the author of _Gaudentio di
+Lucca_ may therefore be considered as unauthorised.
+
+The copy of the edition of _Gaudentio_ of 1786, which is preserved in
+the British Museum, contains in the title-page the following note, in
+pencil:
+
+ "Written originally in English by Dr. Swale of Huntingdon. See
+ _Gent. Mag._ 1786."
+
+The _Gentleman's Magazine_ for 1786 does not, however, contain any
+information about the authorship of _Gaudentio_; and the name of Dr.
+Swale appears to be unknown in literary history. At the same time, a
+positive entry of this sort, with respect to an obscure person,
+doubtless had some foundation. On the authority of this note, Dr. Swale
+is registered as the author of Gaudentio in the printed catalogue of the
+British Museum Library, whence it has passed into Watt's _Bibl. Brit._
+Perhaps some of your correspondents, who are connected with Huntingdon,
+may be able to throw some light on Dr. Swale.
+
+Lastly, it should be added, that the writer of the article "Berkeley,"
+in the _Biographic Universelle_, adverts to the fact that _Gaudentio di
+Lucca_ has been attributed to him: he proceeds, however, to say that--
+
+ "The author of a Life of Berkeley affirms that Berkeley is not
+ the author of that book, which he supposes to have been written
+ by a Catholic priest imprisoned in the Tower of London."
+
+I have been unable to trace the origin of this statement; nor do I know
+what is the _Life of Berkeley_, to which the writer in the _Biogr.
+Univ._ refers. The Life published under the direction of his family
+makes no allusion to Gaudentio, or to the belief that it was composed by
+Bishop Berkeley.
+
+The _Encyclopédie Méthodique_, div. "Econ. pol. et dipl." (Paris, 1784),
+tom. I. p. 89., mentions the following work:--
+
+ "La République des Philosophes, ou l'Histoire des Ajaoiens,
+ relation d'un voyage du Chevalier S. van Doelvett en Orient en
+ l'an 1674, qui contient la description du Gouvernement, de la
+ Religion, et des Moeurs des Ajaoiens."
+
+It is stated that this romance, though composed a century before, had
+only been lately published. The editor attributed it to Fontenelle, but
+(as the writer in the _Encycl. Méth._ thinks) probably without reason.
+The title of Berkeley to the authorship of Gaudentio has doubtless no
+better foundation.
+
+L.
+
+
+[Dunlop, _Hist. Fiction_, iii. 491., speaks of this romance as
+"generally, and I believe on good grounds, supposed to be the work of
+the celebrated Berkeley;" adding, "we are told, in the life of this
+celebrated man, that Plato was his favourite author: and, indeed, of all
+English writers Berkeley has most successfully imitated the style and
+manner of that philosopher. It is not impossible, therefore, that the
+fanciful republic of the Grecian sage may have led Berkeley to write
+_Gaudentio di Lucca_, of which the principal object apparently is to
+describe a faultless and patriarchal form of governnent." The subject is
+a very curious one, and invites the further inquiry of our valued
+correspondent.--ED.]
+
+ * * * * *
+
+ON A PASSAGE IN "THE TEMPEST."
+
+I was indebted to MR. SINGER for one of the best emendations in the
+edition of Shakspeare I superintended (vol. vi. p. 559.), and I have too
+much respect for his sagacity and learning to pass, without observation,
+his remarks in "NOTES AND QUERIES" (Vol. ii., p. 259.), on the
+conclusion of the speech of Ferdinand, in "The Tempest," Act iii., Sc.
+1.:--
+
+ "But these sweet thoughts do even refresh my labours;
+ Most busy, least when I do it."
+
+This is the way in which I ventured to print the passage, depending
+mainly upon the old copies. In the folio, 1623, where the play for the
+first time appeared, the last line stands:
+
+ "Most busie lest, when I doe it;"
+
+and in that of 1632,
+
+ "Most busie least, when I doe it:" {300}
+
+so that the whole merit I claim that of altering the place of a comma,
+thereby, as I apprehend, rendering the meaning of the poet evident. The
+principle upon which I proceeded throughout was that of making as little
+variation as possible from the ancient authorities: upon that principle
+I acted in the instance in question, and I frequently found that this
+was the surest mode of removing difficulties. I could not easily adduce
+a stronger proof of this position, than the six words on which the doubt
+at this time has been raised.
+
+Theobald made an important change in the old text, and his reading has
+been that generally adopted:--
+
+ "Most busy-less when I do it."
+
+In restoring the old text I had, therefore, to contend with
+prepossession, against which, it seems, the Rev. Mr. Dyce was not proof,
+although I only know it from MR. SINGER'S letter, never having looked
+into the book in which I suppose, the opinion is advanced.
+
+One reason why I should reject the substitution of "busy-less," even if
+I had not a better mode of overcoming the difficulty, is properly
+adverted to by MR. SINGER, viz. that the word was not in use in the time
+of Shakspeare. The only authority for it, at any period, quoted in
+Todd's Johnson, is this very (as I contend) corrupted passage in the
+Tempest; I have not met with it at all in any of the older dictionaries
+I have been able to consult; and unless the Rev. Mr. Dyce have been more
+fortunate, he was a little short-sighted, as well as a little angry,
+when he wrote his note upon mine. Had he taken more time to reflect, he
+might have found that after all Theobald and I are not so much at odds,
+although he arrives at his end by varying from, and I at mine by
+adhering to, the ancient authorities. In fact, I gain some confirmation
+of what, I believe, is the true meaning of Shakspeare, out of the very
+corruption Theobald introduced, and the Rev. Mr. Dyce, to my surprise,
+supports. I should have expected him to be the very last man who would
+advocate an abandonment of what has been handed down to us in every old
+edition of the play.
+
+The key of the whole speech of Ferdinand is contained in its very
+outset:--
+
+ "There be some sports are painful, and their labour
+ Delight in them sets off;"
+
+and the poet has said nearly the same thing in "Macbeth:"
+
+ "The labour we delight in physics pain."
+
+It is because Ferdinand delights in the labour that he does not feel it
+irksome:
+
+ "This my mean task
+ Would be as heavy to me as odious; but
+ The mistress which I serve quickens what's dead,
+ And makes my labours pleasure."
+
+He, therefore, tells us, at the close, that his labours are refreshed by
+the sweet thoughts of her; that, in fact, his toil is no toil, and that
+when he is "most busy" he "least does it," and suffers least under it.
+The delight he takes in his "mean task" renders it none.
+
+Such I take to be the clear meaning of the poet, though somewhat
+obscurely and paradoxically expressed--
+
+ "Most busy, least when I do it;"
+
+and when Theobald proposed to substitute
+
+ "Most busy-less when I do it,"
+
+he saw, though perhaps not quite distinctly, that such was the poet's
+intention, only, as I have said above, he arrived at it by altering, and
+I by adhering to, the poet's language. I may be allowed to add that I
+came to my conclusion many years before I was asked to put my name to an
+edition of Shakspeare, which interrupted one of the most valuable
+friendships I ever formed.
+
+MR. SINGER will see at once that my interpretation (which I consider
+quite consistent with the character of Shakspeare's mind, as well as
+quite consistent with the expressions he has used throughout the speech
+of the hero), steers clear of his proposal to alter "busie lest," or
+"busie least," of the folios of 1623 and 1632, to _busyest_ or
+_busiest_; although everybody at all acquainted with our old language
+will agree with him in thinking, that if Shakspeare had used "busiest"
+at all, which he does not in any of his productions, he might have said
+_most busiest_ without a violation of the constant practice of his day.
+
+J. PAYNE COLLIER.
+
+September 24. 1850.
+
+ * * * * *
+
+GRAY'S ELEGY.
+
+Perhaps the HERMIT of HOLYPORT will be satisfied with proofs from GRAY
+himself as to the time and manner of the first appearance of the
+_Elegy_.
+
+GRAY thus writes to Dr. Wharton, under the date of "Dec. 17, 1750." [I
+quote Mason's "Life" of its Author, p. 216.]
+
+ "The stanzas" [which he afterwards called _Elegy_ at the
+ suggestion of Mason] "which I now enclose to you have had the
+ misfortune, by _Mr._ [Horace] _Walpole's fault_, to be made
+ still more public," &c.
+
+The next letter in Mason's publication is a letter from "Mr. Gray to Mr.
+Walpole" (p. 217.), and is dated "_Cambridge, Feb._ 11, 1751," which
+runs thus:--
+
+ "As you have brought me into a little sort of distress, you must
+ assist me, I believe, to get out of it as well as I can.
+ Yesterday I had the misfortune of receiving a letter from
+ certain gentlemen (as their bookseller expresses it) who have
+ taken the Magazine of Magazines into their hands: they tell me
+ that an {301} _ingenious_ poem, called 'Reflections in a Country
+ Church-yard,' has been communicated to them, which they are
+ printing forthwith; that they are informed that the _excellent_
+ author of it is I by name, and that they beg not only his
+ _indulgence_, but the _honour_ of his correspondence, &c.... I
+ therefore am obliged to desire you would make Dodsley print it
+ immediately _from your copy_, but without my name, &c. He must
+ correct the press himself ... and the title must be 'Elegy
+ written in a Country Church-yard.' If he would add a line or two
+ to say it came into his hand by accident, I should like it
+ better ... If Dodsley do not do this immediately, he may as well
+ let it alone."
+
+Dr. Johnson (_Life of Gray_) says:
+
+ "His next production, 1750, was his far-famed _Elegy_," &c.
+
+The Doctor adds:
+
+ "Several of his [Gray's] pieces were published, 1753, with
+ designs by Mr. Bentley, and that they might in some form or
+ other make a book, only one side of each leaf was printed. I
+ believe the poems and the plates recommended each other so well,
+ that the whole impression was soon bought."
+
+It contains _six_ poems, one being the _Elegy_. I have before me a copy
+of this collection, which is folio. The plates are clever, and very
+curious; a copy was sold at the Fonthill sale for 3l. 4s.! The copy,
+admirably bound, which I quote, was bought at a bookseller's
+front-window stall for 4s. The title of this collection is "_Designs by
+Mr._ R. BENTLEY, _for six poems by Mr._ J. GRAY."
+
+According to the title-page, it was "printed for R. DODSLEY, in Pall
+Mall, MDCCLIII.," two years previously to the date to which your
+correspondent refers. This (1753) collection gives the line,--
+
+ "Save where the beetle wheels his _droning_ flight."
+
+In the _Elegant Extracts_ (verse), ed. 1805, which, it must be needless
+to mention, was prepared by the able and indefatigable Dr. Vicesimus
+Knox, the accomplished scholar gives the line--
+
+ "Save where the beetle wheels his _drony_ flight."
+
+Dr. Johnson's _Dictionary_ does not insert the word "droning" or
+"drony;" but among his Illustrations attached to the verb "to drone,"
+there are two from Dryden, each, it may be seen, using the word
+"droning." There is no quotation containing the word "drony." Gray's
+language is:
+
+ "Save where the beetle wheels his _droning_ flight,
+ And drowsy _tinklings_ lull the distant folds."
+
+Johnson's second quotation from Dryden may be worth repeating, as
+showing that Gray's language is not wholly different from his
+predecessor's:--
+
+ "Melfoil and honeysuckles pound,
+ With these alluring savours strew the ground,
+ And mix with _tinkling_ brass the cymbal's _droning_ sound."
+
+It is perhaps hardly worth noticing, that there is not uniformity even
+in the title. Johnson calls it, _Elegy in the Church-yard_; Dodsley
+(1753) styles it, _Elegy written in a Country Church-yard_.
+
+A HERMIT AT HAMPSTEAD.
+
+
+_Gray's Elegy_ (Vol. ii., p. 264.).--The HERMIT OF HOLYPORT is referred
+to the 4to. edit. of the _Works of Gray_, by Thos. Jas. Mathias, in
+which, vol. i. at the end of the Elegy, in print, he will find "From the
+original in the handwriting of Thos. Gray:
+
+ "'Save where the beetle wheels his _droning_ flight.'"
+
+From the autograph the Elegy appears to have been written in 1750; and
+the margin states, published in Feb. 1751, by Dodsley, and went through
+four editions in two months; and afterwards a fifth, sixth, seventh and
+eighth, ninth and tenth, and eleventh; printed also in 1753, with Mr.
+Bentley's designs, of which there is a second edition; and again by
+Dodsley in his _Miscellany_, vol. iv.; and in a Scotch collection,
+called the _Union_. Translated into Latin by Chr. Anstey, Esq., and the
+Rev. Mr. Roberts, and published in 1762; and again in the same year by
+Rob. Lloyd, M.A. The original MS. of the above will be found among the
+MSS. of Thos. Gray, in the possession of the Masters and Fellows of
+Pembroke House, Cambridge.
+
+W.S.
+
+Richmond, Sept 21. 1850
+
+ * * * * *
+
+BISHOPS AND THEIR PRECEDENCE.
+(Vol. ii., p. 254.)
+
+Arun is not right, in reference to this Query, in saying that the
+precedence of bishops over the temporal barons is regulated by the
+statute of 31 Hen. VIII. The precedence of bishops over the temporal
+lords is not regulated by the Act of 31 Hen. VIII. for placing the
+lords. They may have originally been summoned to sit in parliament in
+right of their succession to certain baronial lands annexed to, or
+supposed to be annexed to their episcopal sees; but as some of the
+temporal peers were also summoned in right of lands held of the king
+_per baroniam_, that is not a satisfactory reason why they should take
+precedence of temporal barons.
+
+The precedency must have been regulated by some other laws, rules, or
+usage than are presented by the Act of 31 Hen. VIII. The Archbishop of
+Canterbury precedes the Lord Chancellor; the Archbishop of York the Lord
+President of the Council and the Lord Privy Seal; and all bishops
+precede barons. This precedency, however, is not given by the _statute_.
+The Act provides only, in reference to the spiritual peers, that the
+Vicegerent for good and due ministration of justice, to be had in all
+causes and cases touching the ecclesiastical jurisdiction, and for the
+godly reformation and redress of all errors, heresies, and abuses in the
+{302} Church (and all other persons having grant of the said office),
+shall sit and be placed in all parliaments on the _right side_ of the
+parliament chamber, and upon the same form that the Archbishop of
+Canterbury sitteth on, and above the same archbishop and his successors;
+and next to the said Vicegerent shall sit the Archbishop of Canterbury;
+and then, next to him, on the same form and side, shall sit the
+Archbishop of York; and next to him, on the same form and side, the
+Bishop of London; and next to him, on the same side and form, the Bishop
+of Durham; and next to him, on the same side and form, the Bishop of
+Winchester; and then all the other bishops of both provinces of
+Canterbury and York shall sit and be placed on the same side, after
+their ancienties, as it hath been accustomed.
+
+There is nothing here to show in what order they are to rank among the
+great officers, or other temporal peers; nor is the precedency given to
+the Lord Chancellor over the Archbishop of York.
+
+By the Act of Union of Great Britain and Ireland, the archbishops of
+that kingdom have rank immediately after the Archbishop of York, and
+therefore before the great officers (excepting only the Lord
+Chancellor), as well as above dukes; and the Irish bishops immediately
+after those of England.
+
+It may be rightly stated that the high spiritual rank of the bishops is
+a reason for giving them precedence over the temporal lords sitting as
+barons; but has that _reason_ been assigned by any writer of authority,
+or even any writer upon precedence?--the Query suggested by E. (Vol.
+ii., p. 9.) Lord Coke does not assign that reason, but says, because
+they hold their bishopricks of the king _per baroniam_. But the holding
+_per baroniam_, as before observed, would equally apply to the temporal
+lords holding lands by similar tenures, and sitting by writ, and
+receiving summons in ancient times in virtue of such their tenure.
+
+The precedence of bishops over barons was clearly _disputed_ in the
+reign of King Henry VI., when Baker says in his _Chronicle_ (p. 204.),
+_judgment_ was given for the _lords temporal_; but where the judgment,
+or any account of the dispute for precedence, is to be found I cannot
+say. That is what your correspondent G. inquired for (Vol. ii., p. 76.).
+
+C.G.
+
+
+Your correspondent ARUN (Vol. ii., p. 254.) states, on the authority of
+Stephen's _Blackstone_, that--
+
+ "Bishops are temporal barons, and sit in the House of Peers in
+ right of succession to certain ancient baronies annexed or
+ supposed to be annexed to their episcopal lands."
+
+This position, though supported by Lord Coke in more places than one
+(see _Coke upon Littleton_, 134. _a, b_; 3 _Inst._ 30.; 4 _Inst._ 44.),
+and adopted by most other legal text-writers on his authority, cannot,
+it is conceived, be supported. It seems to be clearly ascertained that
+bishops sat in the great councils of this and other kingdoms not
+_ratione baroniarum_ but _jure ecclesiarum_, by custom, long before the
+tenure _per baroniam_ was known. In the preambles to the laws of Ina
+(Wilkins' _Leges Ang.-Sax._ f. 14.), of Athelstan (_ib._ 54.), of Edmund
+(_ib._ 72.), the bishops are mentioned along with others of the great
+council, whilst the tenure _per baroniam_ was not known until after the
+Conquest. The truth seems to be that
+
+ "The bishops of the Conqueror's age were entitled to sit in his
+ councils by the general custom of Europe and by the common law
+ of England, which the conquest did not overturn."--Hallam's
+ _Mid. Ag._ 137-8, 9th ed.
+
+Can any of your readers throw any light on the much disputed tenure _per
+baroniam_? What was its essential character, what its incidents, and in
+what way did it differ from the ordinary tenure _in capite_?
+
+BARO.
+
+ * * * * *
+
+REPLIES TO MINOR QUERIES.
+
+_Leicester and the reputed Poisoners of his Time_ (Vol. ii., pp. 9.
+92.).--This subject receives interesting illustration in the _Memoirs of
+Gervas Holles_, who at some length describes the seduction of the Lady
+Sheffield, by Leicester, at Belvoir Castle, while attending the Queen on
+her Progress. A letter from the Earl to the lady of his love, contained
+the suspicious intimation--
+
+ "_That he had not been unmindful in removing that obstacle_
+ which hindered the full fruition of their contentments; that he
+ had endeavoured one expedient already which had failed, but he
+ would lay another which he doubted not would hit more sure."
+
+This letter the Lady Sheffield accidentally dropped from her pocket; and
+being picked up and given to the Lord Sheffield by his sister Holles, he
+read it with anger and amazement. That night he parted beds, and the
+next day houses; meditating in what manner he might take honourable and
+just revenge. Having resolved, he posted up to London to effect it; but
+the discovery had preceded him to the knowledge of Leicester, who
+finding a necessity to be quick, bribed an Italian physician ("whose
+name," says Holles, "I have forgotten") in whom Lord Sheffield had great
+confidence, to poison him, which was immediately effected after his
+arrival in London. Leicester, after cohabiting with the Lady Sheffield
+for some time, married the widow of the Earl of Essex, who, it is
+thought, says Holles, "_served him in his own kind, every way_."
+
+In the suit afterwards instituted by Sir Robert Dudley, with the view of
+establishing his legitimacy, the Lady Sheffield was examined, and swore
+{303} to a private marriage with the Earl of Leicester, but that she had
+been prevailed on, by threats and pecuniary largesses, to deny the
+marriage, as Queen Elizabeth was desirous that Lord Leicester should
+marry the widow of the Earl of Essex.
+
+One curious circumstance arises out of the revival of these dark doings.
+Are the particular drugs employed by Leicester's Italian physician "in
+removing obstacles" now known and in operation? By a remarkable
+coincidence, in a case of supposed poisoning at Cheltenham, some time
+since, the intended victim escaped with the loss of his hair and his
+nails.
+
+H.K.S.C.
+
+
+_What is the correct Prefix of Mayors?_ (Vol. i., p. 380.)--In Leicester
+the usage has always been to designate the chief magistrate "The
+worshipful the Mayor," which, I believe, is the style used in
+_boroughs_. In _cities_, and places _specially privileged_, "Right
+worshipful" are the terms employed.
+
+JAYTEE.
+
+
+_Marks of Cadency_ (Vol. ii., p. 248.).--The label of the Prince of
+Wales has, from the time of Edward III. up to the present time, been of
+three points argent, and _not_ charged.
+
+F.E.
+
+ * * * * *
+
+
+MISCELLANEOUS.
+
+NOTES ON BOOKS, SALES, CATALOGUES, ETC.
+
+Although we do not usually record in our columns the losses which
+literature sustains from time to time, we cannot permit the death of
+Thomas Amyot, the learned Director of the Camden Society, and for so
+many years the Treasurer of the Society of Antiquaries, to pass without
+rendering our grateful tribute to the memory of one of the most
+intelligent and kindest-hearted men that ever breathed; from whom we, in
+common with so many others, when entering on our literary career,
+received the most friendly assistance, and the most encouraging
+sympathy.
+
+Every fifty years commences a discussion of the great question when the
+current century, or half century, properly begins. We have just seen
+this in the numerous Queries, Answers, Replies, and Rejoinders upon the
+subject which have appeared in the columns of the daily and weekly
+press; the only regular treatise being the essay upon _Ancient and
+Modern Usage in Reckoning_, by professor De Morgan, in the _Companion to
+the Almanack_ for the present year. This Essay is opposed to the idea of
+a "zero year," and one of the advocates of that system of computation
+has, therefore, undertaken a defence of the zero principle, which he
+pronounces, "when properly understood, is undoubtedly the most correct
+basis of reckoning," in a small volume entitled, _An Examination of the
+Century Question_, and in which he maintains the point for which he is
+contending with considerable learning and ingenuity. All who are
+interested in the question at issue, will be at once amused and
+instructed by it.
+
+Mr. Charles Knight announces a new edition of his _Pictorial
+Shakespeare_ under the title of the National Edition; to contain the
+whole of the Notes, Illustrations, &c., thoroughly revised; and which,
+while it will be printed in a clear and beautiful type across the page,
+and not in double columns, will have the advantage of being much cheaper
+than the edition which he originally put forth.
+
+_The Declaration of the Fathers of the Councell of Trent concerning the
+going into Churches at such Times as Hereticall Service is said or
+Heresy preached, &c._, is a reprint of a very rare tract, which
+possesses some present interest, as it bears upon the statement which
+has been of late years much insisted on by Mr. Perceval and other
+Anglican controversialists, that for the first twelve years of
+Elizabeth's reign, and until Pius V.'s celebrated Bull, _Regnans in
+Excelsis_, the Roman Catholics of England were in the habit of
+frequenting the Reformed worship.
+
+We have received the following Catalogues:--W.S. Lincoln's (Cheltenham
+House, Westminster Road) Sixty-first Catalogue of English and Foreign
+Second-hand Books; W.D. Reeve's (98. Chancery Lane) Catalogue No. 13. of
+Cheap Books, many Rare and Curious; R. Kimpton's (31. Wardour Street,
+Soho) Catalogue No. 29. of Second-hand Books in good Condition at very
+reduced Prices.
+
+ * * * * *
+
+BOOKS AND ODD VOLUMES
+
+WANTED TO PURCHASE.
+
+CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY POLL-BOOKS FOR 1780, 1784, 1790, and
+ 1829.
+
+OXFORD UNIVERSITY POLL-BOOKS for 1750, 1768, 1806.
+
+BEN JONSON by CLIFFORD. 8vo. Vols. II., III., and IV.
+
+Letters, stating particulars and lowest price, _carriage free_, to be
+sent to Mr. BELL, Publisher of "NOTES AND QUERIES," 186. Fleet Street.
+
+ * * * * *
+
+NOTICES TO CORRESPONDENTS.
+
+VOLUME THE FIRST OF NOTES AND QUERIES, _with Title-page and very copious
+Index, is now ready, price 9s. 6d., bound in cloth, and may be had, by
+order, of all Booksellers and Newsmen._
+
+_We are unavoidably compelled to postpone numerous NOTES, QUERIES, AND
+REPLIES: indeed we see no way of clearing off our accumulation of
+REPLIES without the publication of an extra Number, to be devoted
+exclusively to the numerous Answers which we now have waiting for
+insertion._
+
+GUTCH'S Literary and Scientific Regsiter and Almanack, _advertised in
+our last No., is for_ 1851 _not_ 1850.
+
+Mr. G.B. RICHARDSON _would oblige us by forwarding the additional verses
+of_ "Long Lonkin" _for our correspondent_ SELEUCUS.
+
+A CONSTANT SUBSCRIBER _will find the line_,
+
+ "Music hath charms to soothe the savage breast,"
+
+_in Congreve's_ Mourning Bride.
+
+JANUS DOUSA. _In our next No._
+
+MEDICUS, _who inquires respecting the origin of the proverbial saying,
+"Quem Deus vult perdere," is referred to our First Volume_, pp. 347.
+351. 421. and 476. _The original line reads "Quem Jupiter vult," and is
+Barnes' translation of a fragment of_ Euripides. {304}
+
+ * * * * *
+
+THE QUARTERLY REVIEW,
+No. CLXXIV., is published THIS DAY.
+
+CONTENTS:
+ I. TICKNOR'S HISTORY OF SPANISH LITERATURE.
+ II. CHURCH AND EDUCATION IN WALES.
+ III. FORMS OF SALUTATION.
+ IV. SIBERIA AND CALIFORNIA.
+ V. MURE ON THE LITERATURE OF GREECE.
+ VI. METROPOLITAN WATER SUPPLY.
+ VII. ANECDOTES OF THE PROVISIONAL GOVERNMENT.
+VIII. COCHRANES'S YOUNG ITALY.
+ IX. LAST DAY OF LOUIS-PHILIPPE.
+
+JOHN MURRAY, Albemarle Street.
+
+ * * * * *
+
+Will be published on the 1st of November, 1850, with the other
+Almanacks,
+
+THE LITERARY AND SCIENTIFIC REGISTER AND ALMANACK for 1851. Price 3s.
+6d.
+
+Dedicated by especial permission to H.R.H. Prince Albert, by J.W.G.
+GUTCH, M.R.C.S.L., F.L.S.;
+
+Containing a condensed mass of scientific and useful information alike
+valuable to the student and man of science.
+
+Tenth Yearly issue.
+
+Published by D. BOGUE, Fleet Street, London
+
+ * * * * *
+
+Shortly will be Published.
+
+THE ARCHITECTURAL QUARTERLY REVIEW. A Literary Periodical devoted to
+Works appertaining to the Art and Science of Architecture. Prospectuses
+may be obtained from the Publisher. Letters for the Editor, and books,
+drawings, models, and specimens, to be addressed to the care of the
+Publisher.
+
+GEORGE BELL, 186. Fleet Street.
+
+ * * * * *
+
+Royal 4to., cloth, price 2l. 2s.
+
+EXAMPLES OF ANCIENT PULPITS EXISTING IN ENGLAND. Selected and drawn from
+Sketches and Measurements taken on the Spot, with Descriptive
+Letterpress. By FRANCIS T. DOLLMAN, Architect.
+
+This Work contains thirty quarto Plates, three of which are highly
+finished in Colours, restored accurately from the existing indications.
+The Pulpits delineated are St. Westburga, Chester: SS. Peter and Paul,
+Shrewsbury; St. Michael, Coventry; St. Mary, Wendon; St. Mary and All
+Saints, Fotheringay; All Saints, North Cerney; Holy Trinity, Nallsea;
+St. Peter Winchcombe; St. John Baptist, Cirencester; St. Mary, Totness;
+St. Mary, Frampton. Holy Trinity, Old Aston; St. Benedict, Glastonbury;
+St. Peter, Wolverhampton: St. Andrew, Cheddar (coloured); St. Andrew,
+Banwell; St. George, Brakworth; Holy Trinity, Long Sutton (coloured);
+St. Saviour, Dartmouth (coloured); All Saints, Sudbury; All Saints,
+Hawstead; St. Mary de Lode, Gloucester; St. Mary, North Petherton.
+
+GEORGE BELL, 186. Fleet Street.
+
+ * * * * *
+
+To be completed in Four Parts, Parts I. and II., price 5s. each plain;
+7s. 6d. coloured.
+
+ANTIQUARIAN GLEANINGS IN THE NORTH OF ENGLAND: being Examples of Antique
+Furniture, Plate, Church Decoration, Objects of Historical Interest, &c.
+Drawn and etched by W.B. SCOTT.
+
+"A collection of antiquarian relics, chiefly in the decorative branch of
+art, preserved in the northern counties, portrayed by a very competent
+hand ... All are drawn with that distinctness which makes them available
+for the antiquarian, for the artist who is studying costume, and for the
+study of decorative art."--_Spectator._
+
+Parts III. and IV., completing the Work, are in preparation, and will be
+published shortly.
+
+GEORGE BELL, 186. Fleet Street.
+
+ * * * * *
+
+THE EDINBURGH REVIEW,
+No CLXXXVIII., will be publishd on THURSDAY,
+October 10th, 1850.
+
+ I. HISTORY OF THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE.
+ II. THE UNITED STATES.
+ III. BRITISH MUSEUM: CATALOGUE OF PRINTED BOOKS.
+ IV. MURE'S CRITICAL HISTORY OF THE LANGUAGE
+ AND LITERATURE OF ANTIENT GREECE.
+ V. COL. CHESNEY'S EXPEDITION TO THE EUPHRATES AND TIGRIS.
+ VI. RECENT CLASSICAL ROMANCES.
+VIII. DIFFICULTIES OF REPLUBLICAN FRANCE.
+ IX. HORACE AND TASSO.
+
+London: LONGMAN AND CO. Edinburgh: A. and C. BLACK.
+
+ * * * * *
+
+MR. L.A. LEWIS'S SALES for OCTOBER, 1850, FRIDAY 11TH., and SATURDAY
+12th. Valuable Books, Architechural Books, Books of Prints, &c., from
+the West of England, including Stuart and Revett's Antiquities of
+Athens, 4 vols.; unedited Antiuities of Attica; Piranesi Campus Martius
+Antiqua Orbis; Houghton Gallery, 2 vols; Bowyer's Hume's England;
+Rogers' Collection of Prints, 2 vols.; Knorr, Deliciæ Naturæ Selectæ, 2
+vols.; Tableaux Historiques de la Révolution Française, 2 vols.; Stow's
+London, by Strype, 2 vols.; Domesday Book, 2 vols.; Edmondson's
+Heraldry, 2 vols.; Illustrated London News, 11 vols.; Encyclopædia
+Metropolitana, 29 vols.; Neale's Gentlemen's Seats, 6 vols.; Loddiges'
+Botanical Cabinet, 10 vols., large paper; Maund's Botanic Garden, 9
+vols.; Sweet's Geraniums, 5 vols.; Beauties of England and Wales, 32
+vols.; Hogarth's Works, 3 vols., red morocco; Knight's London, 6 vols.;
+Retrospective Review, 14 vols.; Bayle, Dictionnaire Historique, 16
+vols.; Lodge's Illustrious Portraits, 10 vols.; Knight's Pictorial
+Bible, 3 vols.; Clarke's Commentary on the Bible, 6 vols.; a few
+Pictures and Prints, &c.
+
+FRIDAY, 18TH, AND SATURDAY, 19TH.--Books, including the stock of the
+late Mr. C. Whiten.
+
+FRIDAY, 25TH,--Pictures, Prints, Books, Stereotype Plates, Copyrights,
+Books in Quires, &c.
+
+Mr. C.A. Lewis will have Sales on each Friday in November and December.
+
+125. Fleet Street.
+
+ * * * * *
+
+Just published, Part 9, price 9s., plain; Tinted, small paper, 10s. 6d.;
+Proof, large paper, 12s.
+
+THE CHURCHES OF THE MIDDLE AGES: or, Select Specimens of Early and
+Middle Pointed Structures; with a few of the pures; Late Pointed
+Examples, Illustrated by Geometric and Perspective Drawings. By HENRY
+BOWMAN and J.S. CROWTHER, Architects. Containing Illustrations of St.
+Peter's Church, Thrukingham, Norfolk; St. John's, Cley, Norfolk; and St.
+Andrew's, Heckington, Lincolnshire.
+
+To be completed in Twenty Parts, each containing Six Plates, Imperial
+folio. Issued at intervals of two months.
+
+"Ewerby is a magnficent specimen of a Flowing Middle-Pointed Church. it
+is most perfectly measured and described: one can follow the most
+rcondite beauties of the construction, mouldings and joints, in these
+Plates, almost as well as in the original structure. Such a monograph as
+this will be of incalculable value to the architects of our Colonies or
+the United States, who have no means of access to ancient churches. The
+Plates are on stone, done with remarkable skill and distinctness. Of
+Heckington we can only say that the perspective view from the south-east
+presents a very vision of beauty; we can hardle conceive anything more
+perfect. We heartlily recommend this series to all who are able to
+patronize it."--_Ecclesiologist_, Oct. 1849.
+
+"This, if completed in a similar manner to the Parts now out, will be a
+beautiful and valuable work. The perspective of St. Andrew's,
+Heckington, is a charming specimen of lithography, by Hawkins. We
+unhesitatingly recommend Messrs. Bowman and Crowther's work to our
+readers, as likely to be useful to them."--_Builder_.
+
+London: GEORGE BELL, 186. Fleet Street.
+
+ * * * * *
+
+Printed by THOMAS CLARK SHAW, of No. 8. New Street Square, at No. 5. New
+Street Square, in the Parish of St. Bride in the City of London; and
+published by GEORGE BELL, of No. 186. Fleet Street, in the Parish of St.
+Dunstan in the West, in the City of London, Publisher, at No. 186. Fleet
+Street aforesaid.--Saturday, October 5. 1850.
+
+
+
+
+
+End of the Project Gutenberg EBook of Notes and Queries, Number 49,
+Saturday, Oct. 5, 1850, by Various
+
+*** END OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK 13480 ***
diff --git a/13480-h/13480-h.htm b/13480-h/13480-h.htm
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..a32a8b2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/13480-h/13480-h.htm
@@ -0,0 +1,1949 @@
+<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
+ "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
+<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
+<head>
+<meta name="generator" content=
+"HTML Tidy for Windows (vers 1st March 2004), see www.w3.org" />
+<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content=
+"text/html; charset=UTF-8" />
+<title>Notes And Queries, Issue 49.</title>
+
+<style type="text/css">
+
+ /*<![CDATA[*/
+ <!--
+ body {margin-left: 10%; margin-right: 10%;}
+ p {text-align: justify;}
+ blockquote {text-align: justify;}
+ h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6 {text-align: center;}
+ pre {font-size: 0.7em;}
+
+ hr {text-align: center; width: 50%;}
+ html>body hr {margin-right: 25%; margin-left: 25%; width: 50%;}
+ hr.full {width: 100%;}
+ html>body hr.full {margin-right: 0%; margin-left: 0%; width: 100%;}
+ hr.adverts {width: 100%; height: 5px; color: black;}
+ html>body hr.adverts {margin-right: 0%; margin-left: 0%; width: 100%;}
+ hr.short {text-align: center; width: 20%;}
+ html>body hr.short {margin-right: 40%; margin-left: 40%; width: 20%;}
+
+
+ .note, .footnote {margin-left: 10%; margin-right: 10%;
+ font-size: 0.9em;}
+
+ .poem {margin-left:10%; margin-right:10%;
+ text-align: left;}
+ .poem .stanza {margin: 1em 0em 1em 0em;}
+ .poem p {margin: 0; padding-left: 3em; text-indent: -3em;}
+ .poem p.i2 {margin-left: 2em;}
+ .poem p.i4 {margin-left: 4em;}
+ .poem p.i6 {margin-left: 6em;}
+ .poem p.i8 {margin-left: 8em;}
+ .poem p.i10 {margin-left: 10em;}
+ .poem .caesura {vertical-align: -200%;}
+
+ span.pagenum {position: absolute; left: 1%; right: 91%;
+ font-size: 8pt;}
+
+ p.author {text-align: right;}
+ -->
+ /*]]>*/
+</style>
+</head>
+<body>
+<div>*** START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK 13480 ***</div>
+
+<span class="pagenum"><a id="page289" name=
+"page289"></a>{289}</span>
+<h1>NOTES AND QUERIES:</h1>
+<h2>A MEDIUM OF INTER-COMMUNICATION FOR LITERARY MEN, ARTISTS,
+ANTIQUARIES, GENEALOGISTS, ETC.</h2>
+<hr />
+<h3><b>"When found, make a note of."</b>&mdash;CAPTAIN CUTTLE.</h3>
+<hr class="full" />
+<table summary="masthead" width="100%">
+<tr>
+<td align="left" width="25%"><b>No. 49.</b></td>
+<td align="center" width="50%"><b>SATURDAY, OCTOBER 5,
+1850</b></td>
+<td align="right" width="25%"><b>Price Threepence.<br />
+Stamped Edition 4d.</b></td>
+</tr>
+</table>
+<hr class="full" />
+<h2>CONTENTS.</h2>
+<table summary="Contents" align="center">
+<tr>
+<td align="left">NOTES:&mdash;</td>
+<td align="right">Page</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+<td align="left">Stray Notes on Cunningham's London</td>
+<td align="right"><a href="#page289">289</a></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+<td align="left">Satirical Song upon Villiers Duke of Buckingham,
+by Dr. Rimbault</td>
+<td align="right"><a href="#page291">291</a></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+<td align="left">Baker's Notes on Author of "Whole Duty of Man," by
+Rev. J.E.B. Mayor</td>
+<td align="right"><a href="#page292">292</a></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+<td align="left">Mistake about George Wither, by Dr. Rimbault</td>
+<td align="right"><a href="#page293">293</a></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+<td align="left">Useful <i>v.</i> Useless Learning</td>
+<td align="right"><a href="#page293">293</a></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+<td align="left">Minor Notes:&mdash;Numerals&mdash;Junius and Sir
+P. Francis&mdash;Jews under the Commonwealth&mdash;"Is any thing
+but," &amp;c.&mdash;Fastitocalon</td>
+<td align="right"><a href="#page294">294</a></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+<td align="left">QUERIES:&mdash;</td>
+<td></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+<td align="left">Bishop Cosin's Conference</td>
+<td align="right"><a href="#page295">295</a></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+<td align="left">Engleman's "Bibliotheca Scriptorum Classicorum,"
+by Professor De Morgan</td>
+<td align="right"><a href="#page296">296</a></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+<td align="left">Minor Queries:&mdash;Portrait of Sir P.
+Sidney&mdash;Confession&mdash;Scotch Prisoners at
+Worcester&mdash;Adamson's Edward II.&mdash;Sir Thomas
+Moore&mdash;Dr. E. Cleaver&mdash;Gwyan's
+London&mdash;Coronet&mdash;Cinderella&mdash;Judas' Bell&mdash;Dozen
+of Bread&mdash;Kings Skuggsia&mdash;Coins of
+Gandophares&mdash;Satirical Medals</td>
+<td align="right"><a href="#page296">296</a></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+<td align="left">REPLIES:&mdash;</td>
+<td></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+<td align="left">Gaudentio di Lucca</td>
+<td align="right"><a href="#page298">298</a></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+<td align="left">On a Passage in the Tempest, by J. Payne
+Collier</td>
+<td align="right"><a href="#page299">299</a></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+<td align="left">Gray's Elegy</td>
+<td align="right"><a href="#page300">300</a></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+<td align="left">Bishops and their Precedence</td>
+<td align="right"><a href="#page301">301</a></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+<td align="left">Replies to Minor Queries:&mdash;Leicester and the
+reputed Poisoners of his Time&mdash;What is the correct Prefix of
+Mayors&mdash;Marks of Cadency</td>
+<td align="right"><a href="#page302">302</a></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+<td align="left">MISCELLANEOUS:&mdash;</td>
+<td></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+<td align="left">Notes on Books, Sales, Catalogues, &amp;c.</td>
+<td align="right"><a href="#page303">303</a></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+<td align="left">Books and Odd Volumes Wanted</td>
+<td align="right"><a href="#page303">303</a></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+<td align="left">Notices to Correspondents</td>
+<td align="right"><a href="#page303">303</a></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+<td align="left">Advertisments</td>
+<td align="right"><a href="#page304">304</a></td>
+</tr>
+</table>
+<hr class="full" />
+<h2>NOTES.</h2>
+<h3>STRAY NOTES ON CUNNINGHAM'S LONDON.</h3>
+<p>The following notes are so trivial, that I should have scrupled
+to send them on any other ground than that so well-conceived and
+labouriously-executed a work should have its most minute and
+unimportant details as correct as possible. This, in such a work,
+can only be effected by each reader pointing out the circumstances
+that he has reason to believe are not quite correctly or completely
+given in it.</p>
+<p>Page 24. <i>Astronomical Society.</i>&mdash;The library has been
+recently augmented by the incorporation with it of the books and
+documents (as well as the members) of the <i>Mathematical Society
+of London</i> (Spitalfields). It contains the most complete
+collection of the English mathematical works of the last century
+known to exist. A friend, who has examined them with some care,
+specifies particularly some of the tracts published in the
+controversy raised by Bishop Berkeley respecting "the ghosts of
+departed quantities," of which he did before know the
+existence.</p>
+<p>The instruments to which Mr. Cunningham refers as bequeathed to
+the Society, are not used there, nor yet allowed to lie unused.
+They are placed in the care of active practical observers,
+according as the special character of the instruments and the
+special subjects to which each observer more immediately devotes
+his attention, shall render the assignment of the instrument
+expedient. The instruments, however, still remain the property of
+the Society.</p>
+<p>P. 37. <i>Bath House.</i>&mdash;Date omitted.</p>
+<p>P. 143.&mdash;Evan's Hotel, Covent Garden, is described as
+having been once the residence of "James West, the great collector
+of books, &amp;c., and <i>President of the Royal Society</i>."
+There has certainly never been a President, or even a Secretary, of
+that name. However, it is just possible that there might have been
+a Vice-president so named (as these are chosen by the President
+from the members of the council, and the council has not always
+been composed of men of science): but even this is somewhat
+doubtful.</p>
+<p>P. 143. <i>Covent Garden Theatre.</i>&mdash;No future account of
+this theatre will be complete without the facts connected with the
+ill-starred Delafield; just as, into the Olympic, the history of
+the defaulter Watts, of the Globe Assurance Office, must also
+enter.</p>
+<p>P. 143. near top of col. 2. "Heigho! says Kemble."&mdash;Before
+this period, a variation of the <i>rigmarole</i> upon which this is
+founded had become poplular, from the humour of Liston's singing at
+Sadler's Wells. I have a copy of the music and the words;
+altogether identical with those in the music. Of these, with other
+matters connected with the <span class="pagenum"><a name="page290"
+id="page290"></a>{290}</span> amorous frog, I shall have something
+more to say hereafter. This notice is to be considered incidental,
+rather than as referring expressly to Mr. Cunningham's valuable
+book.</p>
+<p>P. 153. <i>Deans Yard, Westminster.</i>&mdash;Several of the
+annual budgets of abuse, obscenity, and impudent imposture, bearing
+on their title-pages various names, but written by "John Gadbury,
+Student in Physic and Astrology," were dated from "my house, Brick
+Court, Dean's Yard, Westminster;" or this slightly varied,
+occasionally being, "Brick Court, <i>near</i> the Dean's Yard,"
+&amp;c. I have not seen a complete series of Gadbury's
+<i>Almanacks</i>, but those I refer to range from 1688 to 1694
+(incomplete). His burial in St. Margaret's, Westminster, in 1704,
+is noticed by Mr. Cunningham, at p. 313. As brick was then only
+used in the more costly class of domestic buildings, this would
+seem to indicate that <i>prophecy</i> was then a lucrative trade;
+and that the successor and pupil of the "arch-rogue, William Lilly"
+was quite as fortunate in his speculations as his master had been.
+It is a truth as old as society itself, that "knaves grow rich
+while honest men starve." Whilst Gadbury was "wallowing in plenty,"
+the author of <i>Hudibras</i> was perishing for want of a
+crust!</p>
+<p>P. 153. <i>Denzil Street.</i>&mdash;Here, about the middle of
+the street, on the south side, lived Theophilus Holdred, a jobbing
+watchmaker, whose name will always hold a place in one department
+of mathematical history. He discovered a method of approximating to
+the roots of numerical equations, of considerable ingenuity. He,
+however, lost in his day and generation the reputation that was
+really due to him for it, by his laying claim to more than he had
+effected, and seeking to deprive other and more gifted men of the
+reputation due to a more perfect solution of the same problem. He
+was, indeed, brought before the public as the tool of a faction;
+and, as the tools of faction generally are, he was sacrificed by
+his own supporters when he was no longer of any use to them.</p>
+<p>I once called upon him, in company with Professor Leyburn, of
+the Royal Military College, but I forget whether in 1829 or 1830.
+We found him at his bench&mdash;a plain, elderly, and heavy-looking
+personage. He seemed to have become "shy" of our class, and some
+time and some address were requisite to get him to speak with any
+freedom: but ultimately we placed him at his ease, and he spoke
+freely. We left him with the conviction that he was the
+<i>bon&acirc; fide</i> discoverer of his own method; and that he
+had no distinct conception, even then, of the principle of the
+methods which he had been led by his friends to claim, of having
+<i>also</i> discovered <i>Horner's</i> process before Horner
+himself had published it. He did not (ten years after the
+publication of Horner's method) even then understand it. He
+understood his own perfectly, and I have not the slightest doubt of
+the correctness of his own statement, of its having been discovered
+by him fifty years before.</p>
+<p>P. 166. <i>Dulwich Gallery.</i>&mdash;This is amongst the
+unfortunate consequences of taking lists upon trust. Poor Tom
+Hurst<a id="footnotetag1" name="footnotetag1"></a><a href=
+"#footnote1"><sup>1</sup></a> has not been in the churchyard these
+last eight years&mdash;except the three last in his grave. The last
+five years of his life were spent in a comfortable asylum, as "a
+poor brother of the Charterhouse." He was one of the victims of the
+"panic of 1825;" and though the spirit of speculation never left
+him, he always failed to recover his position. He is referred to
+here, however, to call Mr. Cunningham's attention to the necessity,
+in a <i>Hand-book</i> especially, of referring his readers
+correctly to the places at which <i>tickets</i> are to be obtained
+for any purpose whatever. It discourages the visitor to London when
+he is thus "sent upon a fool's errand;" and the Cockney himself is
+not in quite so good a humour with the author for being sent a few
+steps out of his way.</p>
+<p>P. 190. <i>Rogers</i>&mdash;a Cockney by inference. I
+<span class="pagenum"><a name="page291" id=
+"page291"></a>{291}</span> should like to see this more decidedly
+established. I am aware that it is distinctly so stated by Chambers
+and by Wilkinson; but a remark once made to me by Mrs. Glendinning
+(the wife of Glendinning, the printer, of Hatton Garden) still
+leads me to press the inquiry.</p>
+<p>P. 191.&mdash;<i>The Free Trade Club</i> was dissolved before
+the publication of this edition of the <i>Handbook</i>.</p>
+<p>P. 192.&mdash;And to Sir John Herschel, on his return from the
+Cape of Good Hope.</p>
+<p>P. 210. <i>Royal Society.</i>&mdash;From a letter of Dr. Charles
+Hutton, in the <i>Newcastle Magazine</i> (vol. i. 2nd series), it
+appears that at the time of Dr. Dodd's execution the Fellows were
+in the habit of adjourning, after the meetings, to Slaughter's
+Coffee House, "to eat oysters," &amp;c. The celebrated John Hunter,
+who had attempted to resuscitate the ill-fated Doctor, was one of
+them. "The Royal Society Club" was instituted by Sir Joseph
+Banks.</p>
+<p>P. 221. <i>Hanover Square.</i>&mdash;Blank date.</p>
+<p>P. 337. <i>Millbank Prison.</i>&mdash;It was designed, not by
+"Jeremy Bentham," but by his brother, the great mechanist, Sir
+Samuel Bentham. In passing, it may be remarked that the Royal
+Military Academy, Woolwich, is constructed on the same principle,
+and, as was stated in the <i>Mechanics' Magazine</i>, on authority,
+a year or two ago, by the same engineer. General rumour has,
+however, attributed the design to his gracious Majesty George III;
+and its being so closely in keeping with the known spirit of
+<i>espionage</i> of that monarch certainly gave countenance to the
+rumour. It may be as well to state, however, that, so designed and
+so built, it has never yet been so used.</p>
+<p>P. 428.&mdash;<i>Benbow</i>, not a native of Wapping, but of
+Shrewsbury. A life of him was published nearly forty years ago, by
+that veteran of local and county history, Mr. Charles Hulbert, in
+the <i>Salopian Magazine</i>.</p>
+<p>P. 499. <i>Whitfield.</i>&mdash;Certainly not the founder of the
+Methodists, in the ordinary or recognised acceptation of the term.
+John Wesley was at the head of that movement from the very first,
+and George Whitfield and Charles Wesley were altogether subordinate
+to him. Wesley and Whitfield parted company on the ground of
+Arminianism <i>versus</i> Calvinism. For a while the two sects kept
+the titles of "Arminian Methodists" and "Calvinistic Methodists."
+The latter made but little ground afterwards, and the distinctive
+adjective was dropped by the Wesleyans when the Whitfieldites had
+ceased to be a prominent body.</p>
+<p>P. 515. <i>Doctor Dodd.</i>&mdash;The great interest excited in
+favour of a commutation of his sentence, led to the belief at the
+time, that his life had not been really sacrificed. Many plausible
+stories respecting the Doctor having been subsequently seen alive,
+were current; and as they may possibly in some future age be
+revived, and again pass into general currency, it may be as well to
+state that the most positive evidence to the contrary exists, in a
+letter of Dr. Hutton's before referred to. The <i>attempt to
+resuscitate him was actually made</i>, by a no less distinguished
+surgeon than John Hunter. He seemed then to attribute the failure
+to his having <i>received the body too late</i>. Wonderful effects
+were at that time expected to result from the discovery of
+galvanism; but it would have been wonderful indeed if any
+restoration had taken place after more than two hours of suspended
+animation. John Hunter, according to the account, does not seem to
+have been very communicative on the subject, even to his
+philosophical friends at Slaughter's Oyster Rooms.</p>
+<p class="author">T.S.D.</p>
+<p>Shooter's Hill.</p>
+<blockquote class="footnote"><a id="footnote1" name=
+"footnote1"></a><b>Footnote 1:</b><a href=
+"#footnotetag1">(return)</a>
+<p>It may not be out of place here to mention one fine feature in
+the character of "Tom Hurst;" his deep reverence for men of
+ability, whether in literature, science, or art. Take one
+instance:</p>
+<p>Fourteen or fifteen years ago, I called one morning at his place
+of business (then 65. St. Paul's Church Yard, which has been
+subsequently absorbed into the "Religious Tract Depository"); and,
+as was my custom, I walked through the shop to his private room. He
+was "not in;" but a gentleman, who first looked at me and then at a
+portrait of me on the wall, accosted me by my surname as familiarly
+as an intimate acquaintance of twenty years would have done. He and
+Hurst, it appeared, had been speaking of me, suggested by the
+picture, before Hurst went out. The familiar stranger did not keep
+me long in suspense&mdash;he intimated that I had "probably heard
+our friend speak of Ben Haydon." Of course I had; and we soon got
+into an easy chat. Hurst was naturally a common subject with us.
+Amongst the remarks he made were the following, and in almost the
+words:&mdash;</p>
+<p>"When my troubles came on, I owed Hurst a large sum of money;
+and the circumstances under which I became his debtor rendered this
+peculiarly a debt of honour. He lent it me when he could ill spare
+it; yet he is the only one of all my creditors who has not in one
+way or other persecuted me to the present hour. When he first knew
+of my wreck, he called upon me&mdash;<i>not to reproach but to
+encourage me</i>&mdash;and he would not leave me till he felt sure
+that he had changed the moody current of my thoughts. If there be
+any change in him since then, it is in his increased kindness of
+manner and his assiduity to serve me. He is now gone out to try to
+sell 'a bit of daub' for me."</p>
+<p>Hurst came in, and this conversation dropped; but it had been
+well had Hurst been by his side on the day his last picture was
+opened to view at the Egyptian Hall. The catastrophe of that night
+might have been averted, notwithstanding Mr. Barnum and his Tom
+Thumb show in the adjoining room.</p>
+</blockquote>
+<hr />
+<h3>SATIRICAL SONG UPON GEORGE VILLIERS, DUKE OF BUCKINGHAM.</h3>
+<p>In turning over some old bundles of papers of the early part of
+the seventeenth century, I met with the following satirical
+effusion upon "James's infamous prime minister," George Villiers,
+Duke of Buckingham. As an echo of the popular feelings of the
+people at the time it was written, it merits preservation; and
+although I have seen other manuscript copies of the ballad, it has
+never yet, as far as I can learn, appeared in print.</p>
+<p>It appears to be a parody or paraphrase of a well-known ballad
+of the period, the burden of which attracted the notice of the
+satirist. It afterwards became a common vehicle of derision during
+the civil war, as may be seen by turning over the pages of the
+collection entitled <i>Rump Songs</i>, and the folio volumes of the
+king's pamphlets.</p>
+<p>The <i>original</i> of these parodies has hitherto eluded my
+researches. It is not among the Pepysian, Roxburghe, Wood, or Douce
+ballads, but perhaps some of your readers may be able to point it
+out in some public or private collection.</p>
+<div class="poem">
+<div class="stanza">
+<p>"Come heare, Lady Muses, and help mee to sing,</p>
+<p class="i2">Come love mee where I lay;</p>
+<p>Of a duke that deserves to be made a king&mdash;</p>
+<p class="i2">The cleane contrary way,</p>
+<p class="i2">O the cleane contrary way.</p>
+</div>
+<div class="stanza">
+<p>"Our Buckingham Duke is the man that I meane,</p>
+<p class="i2">Come love mee where I lay;</p>
+<p>On his shoulders the weale of the kingdome doth leane&mdash;</p>
+<p class="i2">The cleane contrary way,</p>
+<p class="i2">O the cleane contrary way.</p>
+</div>
+<div class="stanza">
+<p>"O happiest kingdome that ever was kind,</p>
+<p class="i2">Come love mee where I lay;</p>
+<p>And happie the king that hath such a friend&mdash;</p>
+<p class="i2">The cleane contrary way,</p>
+<p class="i2">O the cleane contrary way.</p>
+<span class="pagenum"><a name="page292" id=
+"page292"></a>{292}</span></div>
+<div class="stanza">
+<p>"Needs must I extoll his worth and his blood&mdash;</p>
+<p class="i2">Come love mee where I lay;</p>
+<p>And his sweet disposition soe milde and soe good&mdash;</p>
+<p class="i2">The cleane contrary way,</p>
+<p class="i2">O the cleane contrary way.</p>
+</div>
+<div class="stanza">
+<p>"Those innocent smiles that embelish his face,</p>
+<p class="i2">Come love mee where I lay;</p>
+<p>Who sees them not tokens of goodness and grace&mdash;</p>
+<p class="i2">The cleane contrary way,</p>
+<p class="i2">O the cleane contrary way.</p>
+</div>
+<div class="stanza">
+<p>"And what other scholler could ever arise,</p>
+<p class="i2">Come love mee where I lay;</p>
+<p>From a master that was soe sincere and wise&mdash;</p>
+<p class="i2">The cleane contrary way,</p>
+<p class="i2">O the cleane contrary way.</p>
+</div>
+<div class="stanza">
+<p>"Who is hee could now from his grave but ascend,</p>
+<p class="i2">Come love mee where I lay;</p>
+<p>Would surely the truth of his service commend&mdash;</p>
+<p class="i2">The cleane contrary way,</p>
+<p class="i2">O the cleane contrary way.</p>
+</div>
+<div class="stanza">
+<p>"The king understands how he honors his place,</p>
+<p class="i2">Come love me where I lay;</p>
+<p>Which is to his majestie noe little grace&mdash;</p>
+<p class="i2">The cleane contrary way,</p>
+<p class="i2">O the cleane contrary way.</p>
+</div>
+<div class="stanza">
+<p>"And therefore the government justly hath hee,</p>
+<p class="i2">Come love mee where I lay;</p>
+<p>Of horse for the land, and shipps for the sea&mdash;</p>
+<p class="i2">The cleane contrary way,</p>
+<p class="i2">O the cleane contrary way.</p>
+</div>
+<div class="stanza">
+<p>"What, though our fleet be our enemies debtor,</p>
+<p class="i2">Come love mee where I lay;</p>
+<p>Wee brav'd them once, and wee'l brave them better&mdash;</p>
+<p class="i2">The cleane contrary way,</p>
+<p class="i2">O the cleane contrary way.</p>
+</div>
+<div class="stanza">
+<p>"And should they land heere they should bee disjointed,</p>
+<p class="i2">Come love mee where I lay;</p>
+<p>And find both our horse and men bravely appointed&mdash;</p>
+<p class="i2">The cleane contrary way,</p>
+<p class="i2">O the cleane contrary way.</p>
+</div>
+<div class="stanza">
+<p>"Then let us sing all of this nobel duke's praise,</p>
+<p class="i2">Come love mee where I lay;</p>
+<p>And pray for the length of his life and his daies&mdash;</p>
+<p class="i2">The cleane contrary way,</p>
+<p class="i2">O the cleane contrary way.</p>
+</div>
+<div class="stanza">
+<p>"And when that death shall close up his eyes,</p>
+<p class="i2">Come love mee where I lay;</p>
+<p>God take him up into the skies&mdash;</p>
+<p class="i2">The cleane contrary way,</p>
+<p class="i2">O the cleane contrary way."</p>
+</div>
+</div>
+<p class="author">EDWARD F. RIMBAULT.</p>
+<hr />
+<h3>"WHOLE DUTY OF MAN," AUTHOR OF.</h3>
+<h4>(From Baker's MSS, vol. xxxv. p. 469-470. Cambridge University
+Library.)</h4>
+<blockquote>
+<p>"Octo'r 31. 1698. Mr. Thomas Caulton, Vicar of Worksop, &amp;c.
+[as in the note p. xiii. to the editor's Preface, ed. 1842, with
+unimportant variations, such as <i>Madam Frances Heathcote</i>,
+where the printed copy has <i>Mrs. Heathcote</i>; Baker reads
+<i>Madam Ayre of Rampton after dinner took</i>, where the printed
+copy has, <i>Mrs. Eyre</i>. After <i>was dead</i>, follows in
+Baker,] and that in that Month she had buried her Husband and
+severall Relations, but that her comfort was, that by her Monthly
+Sacraments she participated still with them in the Communion of
+Saints.</p>
+<p>"Then she went to her Closet, and fetched out a Manuscript, w'ch
+she said was the original of the <i>Whole Duty of Man</i>, tied
+together and stitched, in 8'vo, like Sermon notes. She untied it,
+saying, it was Dr. Fell's Correction and that the Author was the
+Lady Packington (her Mother), in whose hand it was written.</p>
+<p>"To prove this, the s'd Mr. Caulton further added that she said,
+she had shewn it to Dr. Covell, Master of Christ's College<a id=
+"footnotetag2" name="footnotetag2"></a><a href=
+"#footnote2"><sup>2</sup></a> in Cambridge, Dr. Stamford, Preb. of
+York, and Mr. Banks the present Incumbent of the Great Church in
+Hull. She added, withall, that <i>The Decay of Christian Piety</i>
+was hers (The Lady Packington's) also, but disowned any of the rest
+to be her Mother's.</p>
+<p>"This is a true Copy of what I wrote, from Mr. Caulton's Mouth,
+two days before his Decease.</p>
+<p>"Witness my hand,</p>
+<p>"Nov. 15. 98.</p>
+<p>"JOHN HEWYT."</p>
+</blockquote>
+<blockquote>
+<p>"Bp. Fell tells us, that all these Tracts were written by the
+excellent Author (whom he makes to be one and the same person) at
+severall times, as y'e exigence of the Church, and the benefit of
+soules directed y'r composures; and that he (the Author) did
+likewise publish them apart, in the same order as they were made.
+The last, it seems (w'ch is <i>The Lively Oracles</i>), came out in
+1678, the very year Dr. Woodhead died. Had the Author liv'd longer,
+we should have had his Tract <i>Of the Government of the
+Thoughts</i>, a work he had undertaken; and certainly (as Bp. Fell
+hath told us), had this work been finished, 'twould have equall'd,
+if not excelled, whatever that inimitable hand had formerly wrote.
+Withall it may be observ'd, that the Author of these Tracts speaks
+of the great Pestilence, and of the great Fire of London, both w'ch
+happen'd after the Restoration, whereas Bp. Chappell died in 1649.
+And further, in sect. vii. of the <i>Lively Oracles</i>, n. 2., are
+these words, w'ch I think cannot agree to Bp. Chappell [and less to
+Mr. Woodhead]. <i>I would not be hasty in charging Idolatry upon
+the Church of Rome, or all in her Communion; but that their
+Image-Worship is a most futall snare, in w'ch vast numbers of
+unhappy Souls are taken, no Man can doubt, who hath with any Regard
+travailed in Popish Countries: I myself, and thousands of others,
+whom the late troubles, or other occasions, sent abroad, are, and
+have been witnesses thereof</i>. <span class="pagenum"><a name=
+"page293" id="page293"></a>{293}</span> These words seem to have
+been spoke by one that had been at Rome, and was forced into those
+Countries after the troubles broke out here. But as for Chappell,
+he never was at Rome, nor in any of those Countries.</p>
+<p>"As for Archbp. Stern, no Man will believe him to have any just
+Title to any of these Tracts. [The last Passage concerning
+idolatry, will not agree with Mr. Woodhead, nor the rest with Lady
+Packington.]</p>
+<p>"In a letter from Mr. Hearne, dat. Oxon, Mar. 27, 1733, said by
+Dr. Clavering, Bp. of Petr. to be wrote by one Mr. Basket, a
+Clergyman of Worcestershire. See Dr. Hamond's <i>Letters</i>
+published by Mr. Peck, et ultra Qu&aelig;re."</p>
+</blockquote>
+<p>On so disputed a point as the authorship of the <i>Whole Duty of
+Man</i>, your readers will probably welcome any discussion by one
+so competent to form an opinion in such matters as Hearne.</p>
+<p>The letter above given was unknown to the editor of Mr.
+Pickering's edition.</p>
+<p class="author">J.E.B. MAYOR.</p>
+<p>Marlborough College.</p>
+<blockquote class="footnote"><a id="footnote2" name=
+"footnote2"></a><b>Footnote 2:</b><a href=
+"#footnotetag2">(return)</a>
+<p>The printed copy has <i>Trinity</i> College.</p>
+</blockquote>
+<hr />
+<h3>MISTAKE ABOUT GEORGE WITHER.</h3>
+<p>In Campbell's <i>Notices of the British Poets</i> (edit. 1848 p.
+234.) is the following, passage from the short memoir of George
+Wither:&mdash;</p>
+<blockquote>
+<p>"He was even afraid of being put to some mechanical trade, when
+he contrived to get to London, and with great simplicity had
+proposed to try his fortune at court. To his astonishment, however,
+he found that it was necessary to flatter in order to be a
+courtier. To show his independence, he therefore wrote his
+<i>Abuses Whipt and Stript</i>, and, instead of rising at court,
+was committed for some months to the Marshalsea."</p>
+</blockquote>
+<p>The author adds a note to this passage, to which Mr. Peter
+Cunningham (the editor of the edition to which I refer) appends the
+remark inclosed between brackets:&mdash;</p>
+<blockquote>
+<p>"He was imprisoned for his <i>Abuses Whipt and Stript</i>; yet
+this could not have been his first offence, as an allusion is made
+to a former accusation. [It was for <i>The Scourge</i> (1615) that
+his first known imprisonment took place.]"</p>
+</blockquote>
+<p>I cannot discover upon any authority sufficient ground for Mr.
+Campbell's note resecting a <i>former</i> accusation against
+Wither. He was undoubtedly imprisoned for his <i>Abuses Whipt and
+Stript</i>, which first appeared in print in 1613, but I do not
+think an <i>earlier</i> offence can be proved against him. It has
+been supposed, upon the authority of a passage in the <i>Warning
+Piece to London</i>, that the first edition of this curious work
+appeared in 1611; but I am inclined to think that the
+lines,&mdash;</p>
+<div class="poem">
+<div class="stanza">
+<p>"In sixteen hundred ten and one,</p>
+<p>I notice took of public crimes,"</p>
+</div>
+</div>
+<p>refers to the period at which the "Satirical Essays" were
+<i>composed</i>. Mr. Willmott, however (<i>Lives of the Sacred
+Poets</i>, p. 72.), thinks that they point to an earlier
+publication. But it is not likely that Wither would so soon again
+have committed himself by the publication of the <i>Abuses</i> in
+1613, if he had suffered for his "liberty of speech" so shortly
+before.</p>
+<p>Mr. Cunningham's addition to Mr. Campbell's note is incorrect.
+The <i>Scourge</i> is part of the <i>Abuses Whipt and Stript</i>
+printed in 1613 (a copy of which is now before me), to which it
+forms a postscript. Wood, who had never seen it, speaks of it as a
+<i>separate</i> publication; but Mr. Willmott has corrected this
+error, although he had only the means of referring to the edition
+of the <i>Abuses</i> printed in 1615. Mr. Cunningham's note, that
+Wither was imprisoned for the <i>Scourge</i> in 1615, is a mistake;
+made, probably, by a too hasty perusal of Mr. Willmott's charming
+little volume on our elder sacred poets.</p>
+<p class="author">EDWARD F. RIMBAULT.</p>
+<hr />
+<h3>USEFUL VERSUS USELESS LEARNING</h3>
+<p>A single and practical plan for the formation of a complete and
+useful library and <i>respository</i> of <i>universal</i> literary
+knowledge.</p>
+<p>The design which I propose in the following few lines, is one
+which I should imagine nearly all the more learned and literary of
+your readers would <i>wish</i> to see <i>already in existence</i>
+and when I show that it might be effected <i>with very little
+trouble and expense</i> (indeed <i>no</i> trouble but such as would
+be a <i>pleasure</i> to those interested in the work), and that the
+greatest advantage would follow from it,&mdash;I hope that it may
+meet with favourable consideration from some of the numerous, able,
+and influential readers and correspondents of your journal.</p>
+<p>I am the more induced to hope this from the fact of such a wish
+having been partially expressed by some of your contributors, and
+the excellent leading articles of Nos. 1 and 2.</p>
+<p>What I propose is simply this: the SYSTEMATIC ARRANGEMENT of
+<i>all</i> the existing literary knowledge in the world that is
+considered <i>of value</i> by those best qualified to judge,
+disposed in such a manner as to answer these two purposes: 1st, to
+give a general connected and classified <i>view</i> of the literary
+treasures of the whole world, beginning from the most ancient in
+each language and department (including only what is valuable in
+each); and, 2dly, to afford the greatest possible <i>facility</i>
+(by means of arrangement, references and <i>indexes</i>) to every
+inquirer for finding <i>at once</i> the information he is in search
+of, if it is to be found <i>anywhere</i> by looking for it.</p>
+<p>There are two ways in which this work might be accomplished,
+both of which were desirable, though even one only would be much
+better than none.</p>
+<p>The first and most complete is, to make a real COLLECTION of all
+those works, arranged in the <span class="pagenum"><a name=
+"page294" id="page294"></a>{294}</span> most perfect systematic
+order; and, while doing so, to make at the same time a
+corresponding classified <i>Catalogue</i>.</p>
+<p>The chief (and almost the only) <i>difficulty</i> in the way of
+this would be, to find a <i>room</i> (or suite of rooms) to contain
+such a library and repository; but such would probably be found if
+sought.</p>
+<p>The other way in which this object might be attained is by the
+formation of a simple CATALOGUE in the same order, such as does
+already exist and lies open for public use (though only in
+manuscript, and not so accurately classified as might be) in the
+noble library of the Dublin University.</p>
+<p>This plan would be <i>far easier</i> than (besides forming the
+best possible <i>basis</i> for) that so urgently advocated by MR.
+BOLTON CORNEY (Vol. i. pp. 9, 42, 43.).</p>
+<p>Of course so extensive a design would require to be distributed
+among many hundred persons; but so does any great work: while, by
+each individual undertaking that department in which he is most
+interested and most experienced, the whole might be accomplished
+easily and pleasantly.</p>
+<p>The great fault of antiquarians is, that they are constantly
+<i>beginning at the wrong end</i>: they fix on some one piece of
+information that they want to get, and devote a world of labour to
+hunting about in all directions for anything bearing on the
+subject; whereas the rational way obviously is, to have the whole
+existing mass of (valuable) knowledge <i>classified</i>, and then
+the inquirer would know <i>where</i> to look for his purpose.</p>
+<p>Of course there will always remain much knowledge of a
+miscellaneous and irregular nature which is picked up by accident,
+and does not come within the scope of the present design; but this
+is generally of a trifling and fugitive kind, and does not at all
+controvert the principle above laid down.</p>
+<p>In conclusion, I have worked out a tolerably complete series of
+arrangements for the above design, showing its practicability as
+well as usefulness, which will be much at the service of any one
+who can use them for the furtherance of that object.</p>
+<p class="author">W. D.</p>
+<hr />
+<h3>MINOR NOTES.</h3>
+<p><i>Numerals.</i>&mdash;For the old Indian forms, see Prinsep's
+<i>Journal Asiatic Soc. Bengal</i>, 1838, p. 348. The prospectus of
+<i>Brugsh, Numerorum apud Egyptios Demoticorum Doctrina</i>,
+Berlin, promises to give from papyri and inscriptions not only the
+figures, but the forms of operation. Probably the system assumed
+its present form by the meeting of the Indian and Egyptian traders
+at some emporium near the mouth of the Indus. Peacock seems to give
+undue weight to the fact, that the Tibetans have a copious
+nomenclature for high numbers: their arithmetic, doubtless, came
+with their alphabet, and the Buddhist legends from India.</p>
+<p class="author">F.Q.</p>
+<p><i>Junnius and Sir Philip Francis.</i>&mdash;A few years ago, an
+aged intelligent person named Garner was living at Belgrave, near
+Leicester. I have heard him say that, when he was a farm bailiff to
+Lord Thanet, at Sevenoaks, in Kent, Sir Philip Francis was a
+frequent visitor there, and had a private room set apart for
+literary occupation. On one occasion, when he (Mr. Garner) was
+riding over the farm with Sir Philip Francis, the former alluded to
+one of the replies to Junius, by a clergyman who had been the
+subject of the "Great Unknown's" anonymous attacks, adding, "They
+say, Sir Philip, you are Junius." Sir Philip did not deny that he
+was the man, but simply smiled at the remark. This, and other
+circumstances coupled with the fact of Sir Philip's frequent visits
+to the house of so noted a politician as Lord Thanet, rendered Mr.
+Garner a firm believer in the identity of Sir Philip and Junius to
+the end of his days.</p>
+<p class="author">JAYTEE.</p>
+<p><i>Jews under the Commonwealth</i> (Vol. i., pp. 401. 474.; vol
+ii., p. 25.).&mdash;There is a confirmation of the story of the
+Jews being in treaty for St. Paul's and the Oxford Library in a
+passage in Carte's <i>Letters</i>, i. 276, April 2,
+1649:&mdash;</p>
+<blockquote>
+<p>"They are about demolishing and selling cathedral churches. I
+hear Norwich is designed already, and that the Jews proffer
+600,000<i>l.</i> for Paul's and Oxford Library, and may have them
+for 200,000<i>l.</i> more."</p>
+</blockquote>
+<p class="author">CH.</p>
+<p>"<i>Is anything but," &amp;c.</i>&mdash;As your work seems
+adapted, amongst other subjects, to check the introduction into our
+language of undesirable words, phrases, and forms of speech, I
+would call the attention of your readers to the modern phrases, "is
+anything but," and the like, which have lately crept into use, and
+will be found, in many (otherwise) well-written books.</p>
+<p>I read the phrase "is anything but," for the first time, in
+Napier's <i>Peninsular War</i>; where it struck me as being so much
+beneath the dignity of historical composition, and at the same time
+asserting an impossibility, that I meditated calling the author's
+attention to it. The not unfrequent use of the same phrase by other
+writers, since that time, has by no means reconciled me to its
+use.</p>
+<p>In the <i>Edinburgh Review</i> for January last (1850) I find
+the following sentence:&mdash;"But as pains have been taken to fix
+the blame <i>upon any one except</i> the parties culpable;" and in
+the July number of the same <i>Review</i> (p. 90.) occurs the
+sentence, "<i>any impulse rather than</i> that of patriotism,"
+&amp;c.</p>
+<p>Now, a "thing," or "person," or "impulse,"&mdash;though it may
+not be the "thing," or "person," or "impulse" charged as the
+agent,&mdash;must yet be some <i>certain</i> and <i>specific</i>
+thing, or party, or impulse, <span class="pagenum"><a name=
+"page295" id="page295"></a>{295}</span> if existing as an agent at
+all in the matter; and cannot be "<i>any</i> thing," or "<i>any</i>
+party," or "<i>any</i> impulse," in the <i>indefinite</i> sense
+intended in these phrases. Moreover, there seems no difficulty in
+expressing, in a simple and direct manner, that the agent was a
+very different, or opposite, or dissimilar "thing," or "person," or
+"impulse" from that supposed.</p>
+<p>I wish some persons of competent authority in the science of our
+language (and many such there are who write in your pages) would
+take up this subject, with a view to preserve the purity of it; and
+would also, for the future, exercise a watchful vigilance over the
+use, for the <i>first</i> time, of any incorrect, or low words or
+phrases, in composition; and so endeavour to confine them to the
+vulgar, or to those who ape the vulgar in their style.</p>
+<p class="author">P.H.F.</p>
+<p><i>Fastitocalon.</i>&mdash;<i>Fastitocalon. Cod. Exon.</i> fol.
+96. b. p. 360. 18. read [Greek: Aspido ... chelonae]. Tychsen,
+<i>Physiologus Syrus</i>, cap. xxx.: did the digamma get to
+Crediton by way of Cricklade?</p>
+<p class="author">F.Q.</p>
+<hr class="full" />
+<h2>QUERIES</h2>
+<h3>BISHOP COSIN'S CONFERENCE.</h3>
+<p>Basire in his <i>Dead Man's Real Speech</i> (pp. 59, 60.),
+amongst other "notable instances" of Bishop Cosin's zeal and
+constancy in defence of the Church of England, mentions</p>
+<blockquote>
+<p>"A solemn conference both by word and writing betwixt him and
+the Prior of the English Benedictines at Paris, supposed to be
+Robinson. The argument was concerning the validity of the
+ordination of our priests, &amp;c., in the Church of England. The
+issue was, our Doctor had the better so far, that he could never
+get from the Prior any reply to his last answer. This conference
+was undertaken to fix a person of honour then wavering about that
+point; the sum of which conference (as I am informed), was written
+by Dr. Cosin to Dr. Morley, the now Right Reverend Lord Bishop of
+Winchester, in two letters bearing date June 11, July 11,
+1645."</p>
+</blockquote>
+<p>The substance of this conference has been preserved among the
+Smith Manuscripts in the Bodleian Library; but it is not in the
+form of letters to Dr. Morley. Vol. xl. of this valuable collection
+of manuscripts contains (as described in Smith's table of
+contents):&mdash;</p>
+<blockquote>
+<p>1. "Papers of Bp. Cosins in defence of the Ordination of the
+Church of England against father Prior.</p>
+<p>"The first of these is Bp. Cosin's Review of the Father's
+Letter, &amp;c. [the title-page is placed at p. 77.]</p>
+<p>"Then follows a letter (which is indeed the Bishop's first
+paper, and should be put first) from Bishop Cosin to the
+Father.</p>
+<p>"After that the Father's Answer to Bishop Cosin's Review at p.
+81.</p>
+<p>"Then come two other papers about the validity of our
+Ordination, with a preface concerning the occasion, p. 89."</p>
+<p>2. "Then, p. 101., A Letter from a <i>Rom. Cath.</i> to a Lady
+about communicating in one kind,&mdash;with Bishop Cosin's
+Answer."</p>
+<p>3. "Lastly, in p. 123., is A Letter of Bp. Cosin's to Dr.
+Collins concerning the Sabbath."</p>
+</blockquote>
+<p>The order in which the papers under the first head, about our
+English ordination, should fall, appears to be as
+follows:&mdash;</p>
+<p>1. There is a note attached to p. 65., evidently written by Dr.
+Tho. Smith himself in the following words:</p>
+<blockquote>
+<p>"Transcript of several papers of Bishop Cosin's sent to me by
+Dr. J. Smith, Prebendary of Durham.&mdash;T.S."</p>
+</blockquote>
+<p>2. At p. 77. the title-page is given thus:</p>
+<blockquote>
+<p>"A Review of a Letter sent from F.P.R. to a Lady (whom he would
+have persuaded to the Rom. party) in Opposition to a former paper
+given him for the defence of the Church of England in the
+Ordination of Priests."</p>
+</blockquote>
+<p>To this are appended the respective forms of ordering priests
+used in the Church of England and in the Roman Church.</p>
+<p>3. Then, at p. 89., we have the "occasion of this ... Discourse
+concerning the Ordination of Priests," &amp;c. This is a kind of
+preface, which contains the first paper that was given to the
+Prior, dated June 14, 1645; also another paper, bearing date July
+11, 1645, but ending abruptly in the middle of a sentence, and
+having written below it (probably in Dr. J. Smith's hand) the
+following note:</p>
+<blockquote>
+<p>"The rest of this is not yet found, and that which is written
+thus far is not in the Bishop's own hand, but the copy is very
+fair."</p>
+</blockquote>
+<p>However, this second paper (ending thus abruptly) appears to be
+no more than the first draft of a long letter from Cosin to the
+Prior, which commences at p. 65. of this MS., and which is dated
+"from the Court of S. Germains, July 11, 1645;" for not only does
+this letter bear the same <i>date</i> as the before-mentioned
+fragment, but it begins by complaining of the tone of expression in
+a letter evidently received from the Prior after the draft had been
+prepared, but before it was sent off; and it concludes with the
+following note appended as a postscript:</p>
+<blockquote>
+<p>"Sir,</p>
+<p>"The enclosed (most of it) was prepared for you a fortnight
+since; but now (upon the occasion given by your letter) you have it
+with some advantage from</p>
+<p>"Your servt., J.C.</p>
+<p>"I desire the fav"</p>
+<p>"S. Germ. July 12."</p>
+</blockquote>
+<p>4. The most important part of this MS., however, is contained in
+the long letter or treatise <span class="pagenum"><a name="page296"
+id="page296"></a>{296}</span> placed first in the volume, and
+bearing for its title, "A View of F.P.'s Answer to the First
+Paper."</p>
+<p>This is dated from S. Germains, July 25, 1645 and would appear
+to be Cosin's last letter. But, if it be really so, Basire must, I
+think, be in error, when he says, "Our Doctor ... could never get
+from the Prior any reply to his last answer." For at p. 81. of the
+MS. there is a reply to the above "Review of a Letter sent by F.R.
+to a Lady," &amp;c. which, though copied without either date or
+signature, was evidently written by the Prior, whilst it professes
+to be a reply to a treatise closely answering to Cosin's letter of
+July 25, but which letter the writer did not receive (as he states)
+before the 26th of September.</p>
+<p>I wish yet further to take notice, that Dr. Tho. Smith, in His
+<i>Vit&aelig;</i> (Lond. 1707, pr&aelig;f. pp. vii, viii.), refers
+to these manuscripts in the following satisfactory
+manner:&mdash;</p>
+<blockquote>
+<p>"Cum, post mortem D. Cosini, de pretio et valore schedarum, quas
+reliquit, h&aelig;redibus non satis constaret, ... auspieat&ograve;
+tandem devenit, ut favore, beneficio, et perquam insigni humanitate
+reverendi et doctissimi viri, D. Joannis Smith, Sacr&aelig;
+Theologi&aelig; Professoris Ecclesi&aelig; Dunelmensis
+Pr&aelig;bendarii, quorum frequens hac de re commercium literarum,
+occasione data, (opportun&egrave; intercedente pr&aelig;nobili et
+reverendo, D. Georgio Whelero, equite aurato, et Ecclesi&aelig;
+Anglican&aelig; Presbytero, ejusdem quoque Ecclesi&aelig;
+Cathedralis Prebendario), habui, duos libellos (tanquam
+pr&aelig;tiosas tabulas ab isthoc infami naufragio servatas) a D.
+Cosino, dum in Galli&acirc; exularet, Anglie&egrave; conscriptos
+jam possidieam: quarum unus <i>Vindicias Ordinatianum
+Ecclesie&aelig; Anglican&aelig;</i> contra exceptiones et
+cavillationes cujusdem Pontificii sacerdotis e gente nostra, alter
+<i>Responsionem ad Epistolam</i> nobili f&aelig;min&aelig;
+Angl&aelig; ab alio saccrdote <i>pro defensione communionis sub
+unic&acirc; specie administrand&aelig;</i> inscriptam,
+complectitur," &amp;c.</p>
+</blockquote>
+<p>I should still be glad to add to this long note the followng
+Queries:&mdash;</p>
+<p>1. Can any of your readers kindly inform me whether Cosin's two
+letters to Dr. Geo. Morley are still in existence, either in MS. or
+in print?</p>
+<p>2. Whether there be any fuller or more authentic account of the
+controversy than that in these MS. preserved by the care of Dr.
+Smith?</p>
+<p>3. Whether Cosin wrote any letter to the Prior <i>later</i> than
+that of July 25?</p>
+<p>4. Who was the <i>lady</i> the Prior wished to seduce to the
+Roman party?</p>
+<p>5. Is there any other account of the controversy?</p>
+<p class="author">J. SANSOM.</p>
+<hr />
+<h3>ENGELMAN'S BIBILIOTHECA SCRIPTORUM CLASSICORUM.</h3>
+<p>A little while ago, I ordered Engelman's <i>Bibliotheca
+Scriptoram Classicorum</i>, purporting to contain all such works
+published from 1700 to 1846. It was furnished to my bookseller by a
+foreign bookseller in <i>London</i> with an English title, having
+<i>his own</i> name on it as publisher, and an invitation to
+purchase the books described in it <i>from him</i>. As the paper
+and type were German, I objected and received in consequence a new
+English title, with the same name upon it, and a <i>shorter</i>
+invitation to purchase from him. I was captious enough to object
+even to this; and I then received a Leipzig title in German. But
+there still remains a difficulty: for this German title has also
+the name of a <i>Parisian</i> bookseller upon it, <i>a la maison
+duquel on peut s'adresser, &amp;c.</i> Now, as Engelman is a
+bookseller, and would probably not object to an order out of his
+own catalogue, of which he is both author and publisher, the
+preceding, circumstances naturally raise the following Queries:</p>
+<p>1. What is the real title-page of Engelman's <i>Catalogue</i> 2.
+Is the Parisian house accredited by Engelman; or has the former
+served the latter as the London house has Served both? 3. Is it not
+desirable that literary men should set their faces very decidedly
+against all and every the slightest alteration in the genuine
+description of a book? 4. Would it not be desirable that every such
+alteration should forthwith be communicate to your paper?</p>
+<p>The English title-page omits the important fact, that the
+<i>Catalogue</i> begins at 1700, and describes it as containing
+<i>all</i> editions, &amp;c., up to 1846.</p>
+<p class="author">A. DE MORGAN.</p>
+<p>September 24. 1850.</p>
+<hr />
+<h3>MINOR QUERIES.</h3>
+<p><i>Portrait of Sir P. Sidney, by Paul Veronese.</i>&mdash;In the
+letters of Sir P. Sidney which I found at Hamburg, and which were
+published by Pickering, 1845, it is stated that a portrait of
+Sidney was painted by Paul Veronese, at Venice, for Herbert
+Languet. It would be very interesting to discover the existence of
+this picture.</p>
+<p>Languet had it with him at Prague, <i>framed</i>, as he asserts,
+and hung up in his room, in the year 1575. He remarks upon it, in
+one place, that it represented Sidney as too young (he was nineteen
+when it was taken); in another place he says that it has given him
+too sad an expression. I should add, that on Languet's death, his
+property passed into the hands of his friend Du Plessis.</p>
+<p>I am led to write to you on this subject, by having observed, a
+few days since, in the collection at Blenheim, two portraits by
+Paul Veronese, of persons unknown. There may be many such, and that
+of Sir Philip Sidney may yet be identified.</p>
+<p class="author">STEUART A. PEARS.</p>
+<p>Harrow, Sept. 6.</p>
+<p><i>Confession.</i>&mdash;You would much oblige if you could
+discover the name of a Catholic priest, in <span class=
+"pagenum"><a name="page297" id="page297"></a>{297}</span> German
+history, who submitted to die rather than reveal a secret committed
+to him in confession?</p>
+<p class="author">U.J.B.</p>
+<p><i>Scotch Prisoners at Worcester.</i>&mdash;In Mr. Walcott's
+<i>History of St. Margaret's Church, Westminster</i>, I find the
+following extract from church wardens' accounts:&mdash;</p>
+<blockquote>
+<p>"1652. P'd to Thos. Wright for 67 loads of soyle laid on the
+graves in Tothill Fields, wherein 1200 Scotch prisoners, taken at
+the fight at Worcester, were buried; and for other pains taken with
+his teeme of horses, about mending the Sanctuary Highway, when Gen.
+Ireton was buried."</p>
+</blockquote>
+<p>I have taken the pains to verify this extract, and find the
+figures quite correctly given. I wish to put the Query: Is this
+abominable massacre in cold blood mentioned by any of our
+historians? But for such unexceptionable evidence, it would appear
+incredible.</p>
+<p class="author">C.F.S.</p>
+<p><i>Adamson's Reign of Edward II.</i>&mdash;</p>
+<blockquote>
+<p>"The Reigns of King Edward II., and so far of King Edward III.,
+as relates to the Lives and Actions of Piers Gaveston, Hugh de
+Spencer, and Roger Lord Mortimer, with Remarks thereon adapted to
+the present Time: Humbly addressed to all his Majesty's Subjects of
+Great Britain, &amp;c., by <i>J. Adamson</i>. Printed for J.
+Millar, near the Horse Guards, 1732, and sold by the Booksellers of
+London and Westminster, price One Shilling."</p>
+</blockquote>
+<p>The above is the title-page of a little work of eighty-six pages
+in my possession, which I am inclined to think is scarce. It
+appears to be a defence of the Walpole administration from the
+attacks of the <i>Craftsman</i>, a periodical of the time,
+conducted by Amhurst, who was supported by Bolinbroke and Pulteney,
+the leaders of the opposition. Is anything known of <i>J.
+Adamson</i>, the author?</p>
+<p class="author">H.A.E.</p>
+<p><i>Sir Thomas Moore.</i>&mdash;Can any of your readers give any
+account of Sir Thomas Moore, beyond what Victor tells of him in his
+<i>History</i> of the Theatre, ii. p. 144., "that he was the author
+of an absurd tragedy called <i>Mangora</i> (played in 1717), and
+was knighted by George I."</p>
+<p>In Pope's "Epistle to Arbuthnot," he writes&mdash;</p>
+<div class="poem">
+<div class="stanza">
+<p>"Arthur, whose giddy son leglects the laws."</p>
+</div>
+</div>
+<p>on which Warburton notes&mdash;</p>
+<div class="poem">
+<div class="stanza">
+<p>"<i>Arthur Moore, Esq.</i>"</p>
+</div>
+</div>
+<p>Who was <i>Arthur Moore, Esq.</i>? and who was the "giddy son?"
+Was the latter <i>James Moore Smith</i> a gentleman whose family
+name was, I think, <i>Moore</i>, and who assumed (perhaps for a
+fortune) the additional name of <i>Smith</i>? This gentleman Pope
+seems to call indiscriminately <i>Moore</i>, <i>Moor</i>, and
+<i>More</i>: and when he says that his good nature towards the
+dunces was so great that he had even "rhymed for Moor" (<i>Ib.</i>
+v. 373.), I cannot but suspect that the Moor <i>for</i> whom he had
+<i>rhymed</i>, was the <i>giddy son</i> whom <i>Arthur</i> accused
+him of seducing from the law to the Muses. There are many allusions
+to this Mr. James Moore Smith throughout Pope's satirical works,
+but all very obscure; and Warburton, though he appears to have
+known him, affords no explanation as to who or what he was. He was
+the author of a comedy called <i>The Rival Modes</i>.</p>
+<p>C.</p>
+<p><i>Dr. E. Cleaver, Bishop of Cork.</i>&mdash;I shall feel much
+obliged to any of your correspondents who will furnish me with the
+particulars of the consecration of Dr. Euseby Cleaver to the sees
+of Cork and Ross, in March, April, or May, 1789. Finding no record
+of the transaction in the Diocesan Registry of Cork, and not being
+able to trace it in any other part of <i>Ireland</i>, I am induced
+to believe that this consecration may have taken place in
+<i>England</i>; and shall be very glad to be correctly informed
+upon the point.</p>
+<p class="author">H. COTTON.</p>
+<p>Thurles, Ireland.</p>
+<p><i>Gwynn's London and Westminster.</i>&mdash;Mr. Thomas
+Frederick Hunt, in his <i>Exemplars of Tudor Architecture</i>, 4to.
+London, 1830, in a note at p. 23., alludes to <i>London and
+Westminster improved, by John Gywnn, London</i>, 1766, 4to., and
+has this remark:</p>
+<blockquote>
+<p>"It is a singular fact, that in this work John Gwynn pointed out
+almost all the designs for the improvement of London, which have
+been <i>devised</i> by the civil and military architects of the
+present day."</p>
+</blockquote>
+<p>And Mr. Hunt concludes by observing,, that&mdash;</p>
+<blockquote>
+<p>"This discovery was made by the <i>Literary Gazette</i>."</p>
+</blockquote>
+<p>Will you permit me, through the medium of your useful
+publication, to solicit information of the number and date of the
+<i>Literary Gazette</i> which recalled public attention to this
+very remarkable fact?</p>
+<p class="author">&sect;N.</p>
+<p><i>Coronet.</i>&mdash;In Newbold Church, in the county of
+Warwick, is a monument to the memory of Thomas Boughton of Lawford,
+and Elizabeth his wife, representing him in a suit of armour, with
+sword and spurs, <i>a coronet on his head</i>, and a bear at his
+feet, chained and muzzled. Query.&mdash;Can any of your readers
+give an accurate description of this coronet? Or can any of them
+mention instances of the monuments of esquires having similar
+coronets? The date of his death is not given: his wife died in the
+year 1454.</p>
+<p class="author">Z.</p>
+<p><i>Cinderella.</i>&mdash;Referring to Vol. ii., p. 214., allow
+me to ask in what edition of Perrault's <i>Fairy Tales</i> the
+misprint of <i>verre</i> from <i>vair</i> first occurs? what is the
+date of their first publication, as well as that of the translation
+under the title of <i>Mother Goose's Tales</i>? whether Perrault
+was the originator of <i>Cinderella</i>, or from what source he
+drew the tale? <span class="pagenum"><a name="page298" id=
+"page298"></a>{298}</span> what, moreover, is the authority for
+identifying <i>sable</i> with <i>vair</i> for the employment of
+either in designating the highest rank of princesses?</p>
+<p class="author">SANDVICENSIS.</p>
+<p><i>Judas' Bell, Judas' Candle</i> (Vol. i., pp. 195. 235.
+357.).&mdash;Some time since I asked the meaning of a Judas' Bell,
+and your learned correspondent CEPHAS replied that it was only a
+bell so christened after St. Jude, the apostle. However, it may
+have been connected with the Judas' tapers, which, according, to
+the subjoined entries, were used with the Paschal candle at Easter.
+May I trust to his kindness to explain its purport?</p>
+<blockquote>
+<p>"<i>Reading Parish Accompts</i>.</p>
+<p>"1499. Itm. payed for making leng' Mr. Smyth's molde wt. a Judas
+for the Pascall&mdash;vJd."</p>
+<p>"<i>St. Giles' Parish Accompts</i>.</p>
+<p>"A.D. 1514. Paid for making a Judas for Pascall iiijd."</p>
+<p>"<i>Churchwardens' Accompts of S. Martin, Outwich</i>.</p>
+<p>"1510. Paid to Randolf Merchaunt Wex Chandiler for the Pascall,
+the tapers affore the Rode, the Cross Candelles, and Judas
+Candelles&mdash;viiijs. iiijd."</p>
+<p>"<i>St. Margaret's, Westminster.</i></p>
+<p>"1524. Item payed for xij. Judacis to stand with the
+tapers&mdash;O ijd. O"</p>
+</blockquote>
+<p class="author">MACKENZIE WALCOTT, M.A., Oxon.</p>
+<p><i>Dozen of Bread; Baker's Dozen.</i>&mdash;In the <i>Chronicle
+of Queen Jane, and of Two Years of Queen Mary</i>, lately printed
+for the Camden Society (Appendix iv. p. 112.), it is stated that,
+amongst other particulars in the accounts of the Chamberlain of
+Colchester, at which place Mary was entertained on her way to
+London, there is:&mdash;"For xxxviii. <i>dozen of bread</i>,
+xxxixs." In the language of the county from which I write, "a dozen
+of bread" was (and I believe is yet) used to express either one
+loaf, value twelvepence or two loaves, value sixpence each: and
+even when the sizes and price of the loaves varied, it was used to
+express the larger loaf, or the two smaller loaves. A dozen of
+bread was also divided into six twopenny, or twelve penny
+loaves.</p>
+<p>But in the quotation above, thirty-eight dozen of bread are
+charged thirty-nine shillings; whereas the extra one shilling,
+cannot be divided into aliquot parts, so as to express the value of
+each of the thirty-eight dozen of bread.</p>
+<p>What was a dozen of bread in 1553?</p>
+<p>What is a <i>baker's dozen</i>, and why so called?</p>
+<p class="author">P.H.F.</p>
+<p><i>Kongs skuggsia.</i>&mdash;Is anything, precise known of the
+date and origin of the Icelandic Kongs skuggsia.</p>
+<p class="author">F.Q.</p>
+<p><i>Coins of Gandophares.</i>&mdash;Coins of Gandophares, an
+Indian prince, are described by Prinsep, <i>Jour. Asiatic Soc.
+Bengal</i>, and in Wilson's <i>Asiana</i>. The name is met with in
+the legends of St. Thomas can it be found elsewhere?</p>
+<p class="author">F.Q.</p>
+<p><i>Satirical Medals.</i>&mdash;Is any printed account to be
+found of a very elaborately executed series of caricature medals
+relating to the revolution of 1688?</p>
+<p class="author">F.Q.</p>
+<hr class="full" />
+<h2>REPLIES.</h2>
+<h3>GAUDENTIO DI LUCCA.</h3>
+<h4>(Vol. ii., p. 247.)</h4>
+<p>The work entitled <i>The Adventures of Sig. Gaudentio di
+Lucca</i> was published at London in 1737, in 1 vol. 8vo. It
+purports to be a translation from the Italian, by E.T. Gent but
+this is a mere fiction. The work is evidently an English
+composition. It belongs to the class of <i>Voyages Imaginaires</i>,
+and its main object is to describe the institutions and manners of
+the Mezoranians, an Utopian community, supposed to exist in the
+centre of Africa. Sig. Gaudentio is able, by an accident, to visit
+this people, by the way of Egypt, and to return to Europe; he
+resides at Bologna, where he falls under the suspicion of the
+Inquisition, and having been brought before that tribunal, he
+describes his former life, and his adventures in the country of the
+Mezoranians.</p>
+<p>A second London edition of this work, of the date of 1748, is
+mentioned in the <i>Gentleman's Magazine</i> for Jan. 1777. There
+is an edition in 12mo., printed at Edinburgh, 1761. And there is
+another London edition, in 8vo., of the year 1786. Copies of the
+editions of 1737 and 1786 are in the British Museum.</p>
+<p>There are two French translations of the work. One is of the
+date 1746, under the title of <i>M&eacute;moires de Gaudentio di
+Lucca</i>. The second, of 1754, by M. Dupuy Demportes, speaks of
+the first having been made by an Englishman named <i>Milts</i>; but
+the person and name appear to be fictitious. The first translation
+is said by Barbier, <i>Dict. des Anonymes</i>, No. 11,409, to have
+been revised by the Chevalier de Saint Germain, who made additions
+to it of his own invention. The second translation is reprinted in
+the collection of <i>Voyages Imaginaires</i>, Amsterdam et Paris,
+1787, tom. vi.</p>
+<p>An anonymous writer in the <i>Gent. Mag.</i> for Jan. 1777, vol.
+xlvii., p. 13., speaking of Bishop Berkeley, says that "the
+<i>Adventures of Signor Gaudentio di Lucca</i> have been generally
+attributed to him." The writer of the note added to the <i>Life of
+Berkeley</i> in Kippis's <i>Biogr. Brit.</i>, 1780, vol. ii. p.
+261., quotes this statement, and adds that the work is ascribed to
+him by the booksellers in their printed catalogues. This writer
+thinks that the authorship of Bp. Berkeley is consistent with the
+internal evidence of the book but he furnishes no positive
+testimony on the subject.</p>
+<span class="pagenum"><a name="page299" id=
+"page299"></a>{299}</span>
+<p>In a letter from Mr. J.C. Walker to Mr. Pinkerton, of 19 Jan.,
+1799 (published in Pinkerton's <i>Literary Correspondence</i>, vol.
+ii., p. 41.), Lord Charlemont is referred to as believing that
+Gaudentio di Lucca is founded in fact; that Bishop Berkeley, when
+he was at Cairo, conversed with persons who had attended a caravan,
+and that he learned from them what he narrated in the account of
+Gaudentio. This passage is cited in Southey's <i>Common-place
+Book</i>, p. 204; but the work is manifestly fictitious, and it
+does not appear that Berkeley, though he twice visited the
+Continent, was ever out of Europe.</p>
+<p>The date of the publication of Gaudentio is quite consistent
+with the authorship of Berkeley, who died in 1753; but the notice
+in the <i>Gentleman's Magazine</i> only proves the existence of a
+rumour to that effect; and the authentic <i>Life of Berkeley</i>,
+by Dr. Stock, chiefly drawn up from materials communicated by Dr.
+R. Berkeley, brother to the Bishop, and prefixed to the collected
+edition of his work (2 vols. 4to. Lond., 1784), makes no allusion
+to Gaudentio. There is nothing in the contents of this work which
+renders it likely that the authorship should have been carefully
+concealed by Bp. Berkeley and his family, if he had really been the
+author. The literary execution of Gaudentio is good; and it is
+probable that the speculative character of the work, and the fact
+that Berkeley had visited Italy, suggested the idea that he had
+composed it. The belief that Bishop Berkeley was the author of
+<i>Gaudentio di Lucca</i> may therefore be considered as
+unauthorised.</p>
+<p>The copy of the edition of <i>Gaudentio</i> of 1786, which is
+preserved in the British Museum, contains in the title-page the
+following note, in pencil:</p>
+<blockquote>
+<p>"Written originally in English by Dr. Swale of Huntingdon. See
+<i>Gent. Mag.</i> 1786."</p>
+</blockquote>
+<p>The <i>Gentleman's Magazine</i> for 1786 does not, however,
+contain any information about the authorship of <i>Gaudentio</i>;
+and the name of Dr. Swale appears to be unknown in literary
+history. At the same time, a positive entry of this sort, with
+respect to an obscure person, doubtless had some foundation. On the
+authority of this note, Dr. Swale is registered as the author of
+Gaudentio in the printed catalogue of the British Museum Library,
+whence it has passed into Watt's <i>Bibl. Brit.</i> Perhaps some of
+your correspondents, who are connected with Huntingdon, may be able
+to throw some light on Dr. Swale.</p>
+<p>Lastly, it should be added, that the writer of the article
+"Berkeley," in the <i>Biographic Universelle</i>, adverts to the
+fact that <i>Gaudentio di Lucca</i> has been attributed to him: he
+proceeds, however, to say that&mdash;</p>
+<blockquote>
+<p>"The author of a Life of Berkeley affirms that Berkeley is not
+the author of that book, which he supposes to have been written by
+a Catholic priest imprisoned in the Tower of London."</p>
+</blockquote>
+<p>I have been unable to trace the origin of this statement; nor do
+I know what is the <i>Life of Berkeley</i>, to which the writer in
+the <i>Biogr. Univ.</i> refers. The Life published under the
+direction of his family makes no allusion to Gaudentio, or to the
+belief that it was composed by Bishop Berkeley.</p>
+<p>The <i>Encyclop&eacute;die M&eacute;thodique</i>, div. "Econ.
+pol. et dipl." (Paris, 1784), tom. I. p. 89., mentions the
+following work:&mdash;</p>
+<blockquote>
+<p>"La R&eacute;publique des Philosophes, ou l'Histoire des
+Ajaoiens, relation d'un voyage du Chevalier S. van Doelvett en
+Orient en l'an 1674, qui contient la description du Gouvernement,
+de la Religion, et des Moeurs des Ajaoiens."</p>
+</blockquote>
+<p>It is stated that this romance, though composed a century
+before, had only been lately published. The editor attributed it to
+Fontenelle, but (as the writer in the <i>Encycl. M&eacute;th.</i>
+thinks) probably without reason. The title of Berkeley to the
+authorship of Gaudentio has doubtless no better foundation.</p>
+<p class="author">L.</p>
+<p class="note">[Dunlop, <i>Hist. Fiction</i>, iii. 491., speaks of
+this romance as "generally, and I believe on good grounds, supposed
+to be the work of the celebrated Berkeley;" adding, "we are told,
+in the life of this celebrated man, that Plato was his favourite
+author: and, indeed, of all English writers Berkeley has most
+successfully imitated the style and manner of that philosopher. It
+is not impossible, therefore, that the fanciful republic of the
+Grecian sage may have led Berkeley to write <i>Gaudentio di
+Lucca</i>, of which the principal object apparently is to describe
+a faultless and patriarchal form of governnent." The subject is a
+very curious one, and invites the further inquiry of our valued
+correspondent.&mdash;ED.]</p>
+<hr />
+<h3>ON A PASSAGE IN "THE TEMPEST."</h3>
+<p>I was indebted to MR. SINGER for one of the best emendations in
+the edition of Shakspeare I superintended (vol. vi. p. 559.), and I
+have too much respect for his sagacity and learning to pass,
+without observation, his remarks in "NOTES AND QUERIES" (Vol. ii.,
+p. 259.), on the conclusion of the speech of Ferdinand, in "The
+Tempest," Act iii., Sc. 1.:&mdash;</p>
+<div class="poem">
+<div class="stanza">
+<p>"But these sweet thoughts do even refresh my labours;</p>
+<p>Most busy, least when I do it."</p>
+</div>
+</div>
+<p>This is the way in which I ventured to print the passage,
+depending mainly upon the old copies. In the folio, 1623, where the
+play for the first time appeared, the last line stands:</p>
+<div class="poem">
+<div class="stanza">
+<p>"Most busie lest, when I doe it;"</p>
+</div>
+</div>
+<p>and in that of 1632,</p>
+<div class="poem">
+<div class="stanza">
+<p>"Most busie least, when I doe it:"</p>
+</div>
+</div>
+<span class="pagenum"><a name="page300" id=
+"page300"></a>{300}</span>
+<p>so that the whole merit I claim that of altering the place of a
+comma, thereby, as I apprehend, rendering the meaning of the poet
+evident. The principle upon which I proceeded throughout was that
+of making as little variation as possible from the ancient
+authorities: upon that principle I acted in the instance in
+question, and I frequently found that this was the surest mode of
+removing difficulties. I could not easily adduce a stronger proof
+of this position, than the six words on which the doubt at this
+time has been raised.</p>
+<p>Theobald made an important change in the old text, and his
+reading has been that generally adopted:&mdash;</p>
+<div class="poem">
+<div class="stanza">
+<p>"Most busy-less when I do it."</p>
+</div>
+</div>
+<p>In restoring the old text I had, therefore, to contend with
+prepossession, against which, it seems, the Rev. Mr. Dyce was not
+proof, although I only know it from MR. SINGER'S letter, never
+having looked into the book in which I suppose, the opinion is
+advanced.</p>
+<p>One reason why I should reject the substitution of "busy-less,"
+even if I had not a better mode of overcoming the difficulty, is
+properly adverted to by MR. SINGER, viz. that the word was not in
+use in the time of Shakspeare. The only authority for it, at any
+period, quoted in Todd's Johnson, is this very (as I contend)
+corrupted passage in the Tempest; I have not met with it at all in
+any of the older dictionaries I have been able to consult; and
+unless the Rev. Mr. Dyce have been more fortunate, he was a little
+short-sighted, as well as a little angry, when he wrote his note
+upon mine. Had he taken more time to reflect, he might have found
+that after all Theobald and I are not so much at odds, although he
+arrives at his end by varying from, and I at mine by adhering to,
+the ancient authorities. In fact, I gain some confirmation of what,
+I believe, is the true meaning of Shakspeare, out of the very
+corruption Theobald introduced, and the Rev. Mr. Dyce, to my
+surprise, supports. I should have expected him to be the very last
+man who would advocate an abandonment of what has been handed down
+to us in every old edition of the play.</p>
+<p>The key of the whole speech of Ferdinand is contained in its
+very outset:&mdash;</p>
+<div class="poem">
+<div class="stanza">
+<p>"There be some sports are painful, and their labour</p>
+<p>Delight in them sets off;"</p>
+</div>
+</div>
+<p>and the poet has said nearly the same thing in "Macbeth:"</p>
+<div class="poem">
+<div class="stanza">
+<p>"The labour we delight in physics pain."</p>
+</div>
+</div>
+<p>It is because Ferdinand delights in the labour that he does not
+feel it irksome:</p>
+<div class="poem">
+<div class="stanza">
+<p>"This my mean task</p>
+<p>Would be as heavy to me as odious; but</p>
+<p>The mistress which I serve quickens what's dead,</p>
+<p>And makes my labours pleasure."</p>
+</div>
+</div>
+<p>He, therefore, tells us, at the close, that his labours are
+refreshed by the sweet thoughts of her; that, in fact, his toil is
+no toil, and that when he is "most busy" he "least does it," and
+suffers least under it. The delight he takes in his "mean task"
+renders it none.</p>
+<p>Such I take to be the clear meaning of the poet, though somewhat
+obscurely and paradoxically expressed&mdash;</p>
+<div class="poem">
+<div class="stanza">
+<p>"Most busy, least when I do it;"</p>
+</div>
+</div>
+<p>and when Theobald proposed to substitute</p>
+<div class="poem">
+<div class="stanza">
+<p>"Most busy-less when I do it,"</p>
+</div>
+</div>
+<p>he saw, though perhaps not quite distinctly, that such was the
+poet's intention, only, as I have said above, he arrived at it by
+altering, and I by adhering to, the poet's language. I may be
+allowed to add that I came to my conclusion many years before I was
+asked to put my name to an edition of Shakspeare, which interrupted
+one of the most valuable friendships I ever formed.</p>
+<p>MR. SINGER will see at once that my interpretation (which I
+consider quite consistent with the character of Shakspeare's mind,
+as well as quite consistent with the expressions he has used
+throughout the speech of the hero), steers clear of his proposal to
+alter "busie lest," or "busie least," of the folios of 1623 and
+1632, to <i>busyest</i> or <i>busiest</i>; although everybody at
+all acquainted with our old language will agree with him in
+thinking, that if Shakspeare had used "busiest" at all, which he
+does not in any of his productions, he might have said <i>most
+busiest</i> without a violation of the constant practice of his
+day.</p>
+<p class="author">J. PAYNE COLLIER.</p>
+<p>September 24. 1850.</p>
+<hr />
+<h3>GRAY'S ELEGY.</h3>
+<p>Perhaps the HERMIT of HOLYPORT will be satisfied with proofs
+from GRAY himself as to the time and manner of the first appearance
+of the <i>Elegy</i>.</p>
+<p>GRAY thus writes to Dr. Wharton, under the date of "Dec. 17,
+1750." [I quote Mason's "Life" of its Author, p. 216.]</p>
+<blockquote>
+<p>"The stanzas" [which he afterwards called <i>Elegy</i> at the
+suggestion of Mason] "which I now enclose to you have had the
+misfortune, by <i>Mr.</i> [Horace] <i>Walpole's fault</i>, to be
+made still more public," &amp;c.</p>
+</blockquote>
+<p>The next letter in Mason's publication is a letter from "Mr.
+Gray to Mr. Walpole" (p. 217.), and is dated "<i>Cambridge,
+Feb.</i> 11, 1751," which runs thus:&mdash;</p>
+<blockquote>
+<p>"As you have brought me into a little sort of distress, you must
+assist me, I believe, to get out of it as well as I can. Yesterday
+I had the misfortune of receiving a letter from certain gentlemen
+(as their bookseller expresses it) who have taken the Magazine of
+Magazines into their hands: they tell me that an <span class=
+"pagenum"><a name="page301" id="page301"></a>{301}</span>
+<i>ingenious</i> poem, called 'Reflections in a Country
+Church-yard,' has been communicated to them, which they are
+printing forthwith; that they are informed that the
+<i>excellent</i> author of it is I by name, and that they beg not
+only his <i>indulgence</i>, but the <i>honour</i> of his
+correspondence, &amp;c.... I therefore am obliged to desire you
+would make Dodsley print it immediately <i>from your copy</i>, but
+without my name, &amp;c. He must correct the press himself ... and
+the title must be 'Elegy written in a Country Church-yard.' If he
+would add a line or two to say it came into his hand by accident, I
+should like it better ... If Dodsley do not do this immediately, he
+may as well let it alone."</p>
+</blockquote>
+<p>Dr. Johnson (<i>Life of Gray</i>) says:</p>
+<blockquote>
+<p>"His next production, 1750, was his far-famed <i>Elegy</i>,"
+&amp;c.</p>
+</blockquote>
+<p>The Doctor adds:</p>
+<blockquote>
+<p>"Several of his [Gray's] pieces were published, 1753, with
+designs by Mr. Bentley, and that they might in some form or other
+make a book, only one side of each leaf was printed. I believe the
+poems and the plates recommended each other so well, that the whole
+impression was soon bought."</p>
+</blockquote>
+<p>It contains <i>six</i> poems, one being the <i>Elegy</i>. I have
+before me a copy of this collection, which is folio. The plates are
+clever, and very curious; a copy was sold at the Fonthill sale for
+3<i>l.</i> 4<i>s.</i>! The copy, admirably bound, which I quote,
+was bought at a bookseller's front-window stall for 4<i>s.</i> The
+title of this collection is "<i>Designs by Mr.</i> R. BENTLEY,
+<i>for six poems by Mr.</i> J. GRAY."</p>
+<p>According to the title-page, it was "printed for R. DODSLEY, in
+Pall Mall, MDCCLIII.," two years previously to the date to which
+your correspondent refers. This (1753) collection gives the
+line,&mdash;</p>
+<div class="poem">
+<div class="stanza">
+<p>"Save where the beetle wheels his <i>droning</i> flight."</p>
+</div>
+</div>
+<p>In the <i>Elegant Extracts</i> (verse), ed. 1805, which, it must
+be needless to mention, was prepared by the able and indefatigable
+Dr. Vicesimus Knox, the accomplished scholar gives the
+line&mdash;</p>
+<div class="poem">
+<div class="stanza">
+<p>"Save where the beetle wheels his <i>drony</i> flight."</p>
+</div>
+</div>
+<p>Dr. Johnson's <i>Dictionary</i> does not insert the word
+"droning" or "drony;" but among his Illustrations attached to the
+verb "to drone," there are two from Dryden, each, it may be seen,
+using the word "droning." There is no quotation containing the word
+"drony." Gray's language is:</p>
+<div class="poem">
+<div class="stanza">
+<p>"Save where the beetle wheels his <i>droning</i> flight,</p>
+<p>And drowsy <i>tinklings</i> lull the distant folds."</p>
+</div>
+</div>
+<p>Johnson's second quotation from Dryden may be worth repeating,
+as showing that Gray's language is not wholly different from his
+predecessor's:&mdash;</p>
+<div class="poem">
+<div class="stanza">
+<p class="i8">"Melfoil and honeysuckles pound,</p>
+<p>With these alluring savours strew the ground,</p>
+<p>And mix with <i>tinkling</i> brass the cymbal's <i>droning</i>
+sound."</p>
+</div>
+</div>
+<p>It is perhaps hardly worth noticing, that there is not
+uniformity even in the title. Johnson calls it, <i>Elegy in the
+Church-yard</i>; Dodsley (1753) styles it, <i>Elegy written in a
+Country Church-yard</i>.</p>
+<p class="author">A HERMIT AT HAMPSTEAD.</p>
+<p><i>Gray's Elegy</i> (Vol. ii., p. 264.).&mdash;The HERMIT OF
+HOLYPORT is referred to the 4to. edit. of the <i>Works of Gray</i>,
+by Thos. Jas. Mathias, in which, vol. i. at the end of the Elegy,
+in print, he will find "From the original in the handwriting of
+Thos. Gray:</p>
+<div class="poem">
+<div class="stanza">
+<p>"'Save where the beetle wheels his <i>droning</i> flight.'"</p>
+</div>
+</div>
+<p>From the autograph the Elegy appears to have been written in
+1750; and the margin states, published in Feb. 1751, by Dodsley,
+and went through four editions in two months; and afterwards a
+fifth, sixth, seventh and eighth, ninth and tenth, and eleventh;
+printed also in 1753, with Mr. Bentley's designs, of which there is
+a second edition; and again by Dodsley in his <i>Miscellany</i>,
+vol. iv.; and in a Scotch collection, called the <i>Union</i>.
+Translated into Latin by Chr. Anstey, Esq., and the Rev. Mr.
+Roberts, and published in 1762; and again in the same year by Rob.
+Lloyd, M.A. The original MS. of the above will be found among the
+MSS. of Thos. Gray, in the possession of the Masters and Fellows of
+Pembroke House, Cambridge.</p>
+<p class="author">W.S.</p>
+<p>Richmond, Sept 21. 1850</p>
+<hr />
+<h3>BISHOPS AND THEIR PRECEDENCE.</h3>
+<h4>(Vol. ii., p. 254.)</h4>
+<p>Arun is not right, in reference to this Query, in saying that
+the precedence of bishops over the temporal barons is regulated by
+the statute of 31 Hen. VIII. The precedence of bishops over the
+temporal lords is not regulated by the Act of 31 Hen. VIII. for
+placing the lords. They may have originally been summoned to sit in
+parliament in right of their succession to certain baronial lands
+annexed to, or supposed to be annexed to their episcopal sees; but
+as some of the temporal peers were also summoned in right of lands
+held of the king <i>per baroniam</i>, that is not a satisfactory
+reason why they should take precedence of temporal barons.</p>
+<p>The precedency must have been regulated by some other laws,
+rules, or usage than are presented by the Act of 31 Hen. VIII. The
+Archbishop of Canterbury precedes the Lord Chancellor; the
+Archbishop of York the Lord President of the Council and the Lord
+Privy Seal; and all bishops precede barons. This precedency,
+however, is not given by the <i>statute</i>. The Act provides only,
+in reference to the spiritual peers, that the Vicegerent for good
+and due ministration of justice, to be had in all causes and cases
+touching the ecclesiastical jurisdiction, and for the godly
+reformation and redress of all errors, heresies, and abuses in the
+<span class="pagenum"><a name="page302" id=
+"page302"></a>{302}</span> Church (and all other persons having
+grant of the said office), shall sit and be placed in all
+parliaments on the <i>right side</i> of the parliament chamber, and
+upon the same form that the Archbishop of Canterbury sitteth on,
+and above the same archbishop and his successors; and next to the
+said Vicegerent shall sit the Archbishop of Canterbury; and then,
+next to him, on the same form and side, shall sit the Archbishop of
+York; and next to him, on the same form and side, the Bishop of
+London; and next to him, on the same side and form, the Bishop of
+Durham; and next to him, on the same side and form, the Bishop of
+Winchester; and then all the other bishops of both provinces of
+Canterbury and York shall sit and be placed on the same side, after
+their ancienties, as it hath been accustomed.</p>
+<p>There is nothing here to show in what order they are to rank
+among the great officers, or other temporal peers; nor is the
+precedency given to the Lord Chancellor over the Archbishop of
+York.</p>
+<p>By the Act of Union of Great Britain and Ireland, the
+archbishops of that kingdom have rank immediately after the
+Archbishop of York, and therefore before the great officers
+(excepting only the Lord Chancellor), as well as above dukes; and
+the Irish bishops immediately after those of England.</p>
+<p>It may be rightly stated that the high spiritual rank of the
+bishops is a reason for giving them precedence over the temporal
+lords sitting as barons; but has that <i>reason</i> been assigned
+by any writer of authority, or even any writer upon
+precedence?&mdash;the Query suggested by E. (Vol. ii., p. 9.) Lord
+Coke does not assign that reason, but says, because they hold their
+bishopricks of the king <i>per baroniam</i>. But the holding <i>per
+baroniam</i>, as before observed, would equally apply to the
+temporal lords holding lands by similar tenures, and sitting by
+writ, and receiving summons in ancient times in virtue of such
+their tenure.</p>
+<p>The precedence of bishops over barons was clearly
+<i>disputed</i> in the reign of King Henry VI., when Baker says in
+his <i>Chronicle</i> (p. 204.), <i>judgment</i> was given for the
+<i>lords temporal</i>; but where the judgment, or any account of
+the dispute for precedence, is to be found I cannot say. That is
+what your correspondent G. inquired for (Vol. ii., p. 76.).</p>
+<p class="author">C.G.</p>
+<p>Your correspondent ARUN (Vol. ii., p. 254.) states, on the
+authority of Stephen's <i>Blackstone</i>, that&mdash;</p>
+<blockquote>
+<p>"Bishops are temporal barons, and sit in the House of Peers in
+right of succession to certain ancient baronies annexed or supposed
+to be annexed to their episcopal lands."</p>
+</blockquote>
+<p>This position, though supported by Lord Coke in more places than
+one (see <i>Coke upon Littleton</i>, 134. <i>a, b</i>; 3
+<i>Inst.</i> 30.; 4 <i>Inst.</i> 44.), and adopted by most other
+legal text-writers on his authority, cannot, it is conceived, be
+supported. It seems to be clearly ascertained that bishops sat in
+the great councils of this and other kingdoms not <i>ratione
+baroniarum</i> but <i>jure ecclesiarum</i>, by custom, long before
+the tenure <i>per baroniam</i> was known. In the preambles to the
+laws of Ina (Wilkins' <i>Leges Ang.-Sax.</i> f. 14.), of Athelstan
+(<i>ib.</i> 54.), of Edmund (<i>ib.</i> 72.), the bishops are
+mentioned along with others of the great council, whilst the tenure
+<i>per baroniam</i> was not known until after the Conquest. The
+truth seems to be that</p>
+<blockquote>
+<p>"The bishops of the Conqueror's age were entitled to sit in his
+councils by the general custom of Europe and by the common law of
+England, which the conquest did not overturn."&mdash;Hallam's
+<i>Mid. Ag.</i> 137-8, 9th ed.</p>
+</blockquote>
+<p>Can any of your readers throw any light on the much disputed
+tenure <i>per baroniam</i>? What was its essential character, what
+its incidents, and in what way did it differ from the ordinary
+tenure <i>in capite</i>?</p>
+<p class="author">BARO.</p>
+<hr />
+<h3>REPLIES TO MINOR QUERIES.</h3>
+<p><i>Leicester and the reputed Poisoners of his Time</i> (Vol.
+ii., pp. 9. 92.).&mdash;This subject receives interesting
+illustration in the <i>Memoirs of Gervas Holles</i>, who at some
+length describes the seduction of the Lady Sheffield, by Leicester,
+at Belvoir Castle, while attending the Queen on her Progress. A
+letter from the Earl to the lady of his love, contained the
+suspicious intimation&mdash;</p>
+<blockquote>
+<p>"<i>That he had not been unmindful in removing that obstacle</i>
+which hindered the full fruition of their contentments; that he had
+endeavoured one expedient already which had failed, but he would
+lay another which he doubted not would hit more sure."</p>
+</blockquote>
+<p>This letter the Lady Sheffield accidentally dropped from her
+pocket; and being picked up and given to the Lord Sheffield by his
+sister Holles, he read it with anger and amazement. That night he
+parted beds, and the next day houses; meditating in what manner he
+might take honourable and just revenge. Having resolved, he posted
+up to London to effect it; but the discovery had preceded him to
+the knowledge of Leicester, who finding a necessity to be quick,
+bribed an Italian physician ("whose name," says Holles, "I have
+forgotten") in whom Lord Sheffield had great confidence, to poison
+him, which was immediately effected after his arrival in London.
+Leicester, after cohabiting with the Lady Sheffield for some time,
+married the widow of the Earl of Essex, who, it is thought, says
+Holles, "<i>served him in his own kind, every way</i>."</p>
+<p>In the suit afterwards instituted by Sir Robert Dudley, with the
+view of establishing his legitimacy, the Lady Sheffield was
+examined, and swore <span class="pagenum"><a name="page303" id=
+"page303"></a>{303}</span> to a private marriage with the Earl of
+Leicester, but that she had been prevailed on, by threats and
+pecuniary largesses, to deny the marriage, as Queen Elizabeth was
+desirous that Lord Leicester should marry the widow of the Earl of
+Essex.</p>
+<p>One curious circumstance arises out of the revival of these dark
+doings. Are the particular drugs employed by Leicester's Italian
+physician "in removing obstacles" now known and in operation? By a
+remarkable coincidence, in a case of supposed poisoning at
+Cheltenham, some time since, the intended victim escaped with the
+loss of his hair and his nails.</p>
+<p class="author">H.K.S.C.</p>
+<p><i>What is the correct Prefix of Mayors?</i> (Vol. i., p.
+380.)&mdash;In Leicester the usage has always been to designate the
+chief magistrate "The worshipful the Mayor," which, I believe, is
+the style used in <i>boroughs</i>. In <i>cities</i>, and places
+<i>specially privileged</i>, "Right worshipful" are the terms
+employed.</p>
+<p class="author">JAYTEE.</p>
+<p><i>Marks of Cadency</i> (Vol. ii., p. 248.).&mdash;The label of
+the Prince of Wales has, from the time of Edward III. up to the
+present time, been of three points argent, and <i>not</i>
+charged.</p>
+<p class="author">F.E.</p>
+<hr class="full" />
+<h2>MISCELLANEOUS.</h2>
+<h3>NOTES ON BOOKS, SALES, CATALOGUES, ETC.</h3>
+<p>Although we do not usually record in our columns the losses
+which literature sustains from time to time, we cannot permit the
+death of Thomas Amyot, the learned Director of the Camden Society,
+and for so many years the Treasurer of the Society of Antiquaries,
+to pass without rendering our grateful tribute to the memory of one
+of the most intelligent and kindest-hearted men that ever breathed;
+from whom we, in common with so many others, when entering on our
+literary career, received the most friendly assistance, and the
+most encouraging sympathy.</p>
+<p>Every fifty years commences a discussion of the great question
+when the current century, or half century, properly begins. We have
+just seen this in the numerous Queries, Answers, Replies, and
+Rejoinders upon the subject which have appeared in the columns of
+the daily and weekly press; the only regular treatise being the
+essay upon <i>Ancient and Modern Usage in Reckoning</i>, by
+professor De Morgan, in the <i>Companion to the Almanack</i> for
+the present year. This Essay is opposed to the idea of a "zero
+year," and one of the advocates of that system of computation has,
+therefore, undertaken a defence of the zero principle, which he
+pronounces, "when properly understood, is undoubtedly the most
+correct basis of reckoning," in a small volume entitled, <i>An
+Examination of the Century Question</i>, and in which he maintains
+the point for which he is contending with considerable learning and
+ingenuity. All who are interested in the question at issue, will be
+at once amused and instructed by it.</p>
+<p>Mr. Charles Knight announces a new edition of his <i>Pictorial
+Shakespeare</i> under the title of the National Edition; to contain
+the whole of the Notes, Illustrations, &amp;c., thoroughly revised;
+and which, while it will be printed in a clear and beautiful type
+across the page, and not in double columns, will have the advantage
+of being much cheaper than the edition which he originally put
+forth.</p>
+<p><i>The Declaration of the Fathers of the Councell of Trent
+concerning the going into Churches at such Times as Hereticall
+Service is said or Heresy preached, &amp;c.</i>, is a reprint of a
+very rare tract, which possesses some present interest, as it bears
+upon the statement which has been of late years much insisted on by
+Mr. Perceval and other Anglican controversialists, that for the
+first twelve years of Elizabeth's reign, and until Pius V.'s
+celebrated Bull, <i>Regnans in Excelsis</i>, the Roman Catholics of
+England were in the habit of frequenting the Reformed worship.</p>
+<p>We have received the following Catalogues:&mdash;W.S. Lincoln's
+(Cheltenham House, Westminster Road) Sixty-first Catalogue of
+English and Foreign Second-hand Books; W.D. Reeve's (98. Chancery
+Lane) Catalogue No. 13. of Cheap Books, many Rare and Curious; R.
+Kimpton's (31. Wardour Street, Soho) Catalogue No. 29. of
+Second-hand Books in good Condition at very reduced Prices.</p>
+<hr />
+<h3>BOOKS AND ODD VOLUMES</h3>
+<h4>WANTED TO PURCHASE.</h4>
+<p>CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY POLL-BOOKS FOR 1780, 1784, 1790, and
+1829.</p>
+<p>OXFORD UNIVERSITY POLL-BOOKS for 1750, 1768, 1806.</p>
+<p>BEN JONSON by CLIFFORD. 8vo. Vols. II., III., and IV.</p>
+<p>Letters, stating particulars and lowest price, <i>carriage
+free</i>, to be sent to Mr. BELL, Publisher of "NOTES AND QUERIES,"
+186. Fleet Street.</p>
+<hr />
+<h3>NOTICES TO CORRESPONDENTS.</h3>
+<p>VOLUME THE FIRST OF NOTES AND QUERIES, <i>with Title-page and
+very copious Index, is now ready, price 9s. 6d., bound in cloth,
+and may be had, by order, of all Booksellers and Newsmen.</i></p>
+<p><i>We are unavoidably compelled to postpone numerous NOTES,
+QUERIES, AND REPLIES: indeed we see no way of clearing off our
+accumulation of REPLIES without the publication of an extra Number,
+to be devoted exclusively to the numerous Answers which we now have
+waiting for insertion.</i></p>
+<p>GUTCH'S Literary and Scientific Regsiter and Almanack,
+<i>advertised in our last No., is for</i> 1851 <i>not</i> 1850.</p>
+<p>Mr. G.B. RICHARDSON <i>would oblige us by forwarding the
+additional verses of</i> "Long Lonkin" <i>for our correspondent</i>
+SELEUCUS.</p>
+<p>A CONSTANT SUBSCRIBER <i>will find the line</i>,</p>
+<div class="poem">
+<div class="stanza">
+<p>"Music hath charms to soothe the savage breast,"</p>
+</div>
+</div>
+<p><i>in Congreve's</i> Mourning Bride.</p>
+<p>JANUS DOUSA. <i>In our next No.</i></p>
+<p>MEDICUS, <i>who inquires respecting the origin of the proverbial
+saying, "Quem Deus vult perdere," is referred to our First
+Volume</i>, pp. 347. 351. 421. and 476. <i>The original line reads
+"Quem Jupiter vult," and is Barnes' translation of a fragment
+of</i> Euripides. <span class="pagenum"><a name="page304" id=
+"page304"></a>{304}</span></p>
+<hr class="adverts" />
+<p>THE QUARTERLY REVIEW, No. CLXXIV., is published THIS DAY.</p>
+<blockquote>
+<p>CONTENTS:<br />
+I. TICKNOR'S HISTORY OF SPANISH LITERATURE.<br />
+II. CHURCH AND EDUCATION IN WALES.<br />
+III. FORMS OF SALUTATION.<br />
+IV. SIBERIA AND CALIFORNIA.<br />
+V. MURE ON THE LITERATURE OF GREECE.<br />
+VI. METROPOLITAN WATER SUPPLY.<br />
+VII. ANECDOTES OF THE PROVISIONAL GOVERNMENT.<br />
+VIII. COCHRANES'S YOUNG ITALY.<br />
+IX. LAST DAY OF LOUIS-PHILIPPE.</p>
+<p>JOHN MURRAY, Albemarle Street.</p>
+</blockquote>
+<hr />
+<p>Will be published on the 1st of November, 1850, with the other
+Almanacks,</p>
+<p>THE LITERARY AND SCIENTIFIC REGISTER AND ALMANACK for 1851.
+Price 3<i>s.</i> 6<i>d.</i></p>
+<p>Dedicated by especial permission to H.R.H. Prince Albert, by
+J.W.G. GUTCH, M.R.C.S.L., F.L.S.;</p>
+<p>Containing a condensed mass of scientific and useful information
+alike valuable to the student and man of science.</p>
+<p>Tenth Yearly issue.</p>
+<p>Published by D. BOGUE, Fleet Street, London</p>
+<hr />
+<p>Shortly will be Published.</p>
+<p>THE ARCHITECTURAL QUARTERLY REVIEW. A Literary Periodical
+devoted to Works appertaining to the Art and Science of
+Architecture. Prospectuses may be obtained from the Publisher.
+Letters for the Editor, and books, drawings, models, and specimens,
+to be addressed to the care of the Publisher.</p>
+<p>GEORGE BELL, 186. Fleet Street.</p>
+<hr />
+<p>Royal 4to., cloth, price 2<i>l.</i> 2<i>s.</i></p>
+<p>EXAMPLES OF ANCIENT PULPITS EXISTING IN ENGLAND. Selected and
+drawn from Sketches and Measurements taken on the Spot, with
+Descriptive Letterpress. By FRANCIS T. DOLLMAN, Architect.</p>
+<p>This Work contains thirty quarto Plates, three of which are
+highly finished in Colours, restored accurately from the existing
+indications. The Pulpits delineated are St. Westburga, Chester: SS.
+Peter and Paul, Shrewsbury; St. Michael, Coventry; St. Mary,
+Wendon; St. Mary and All Saints, Fotheringay; All Saints, North
+Cerney; Holy Trinity, Nallsea; St. Peter Winchcombe; St. John
+Baptist, Cirencester; St. Mary, Totness; St. Mary, Frampton. Holy
+Trinity, Old Aston; St. Benedict, Glastonbury; St. Peter,
+Wolverhampton: St. Andrew, Cheddar (coloured); St. Andrew, Banwell;
+St. George, Brakworth; Holy Trinity, Long Sutton (coloured); St.
+Saviour, Dartmouth (coloured); All Saints, Sudbury; All Saints,
+Hawstead; St. Mary de Lode, Gloucester; St. Mary, North
+Petherton.</p>
+<p>GEORGE BELL, 186. Fleet Street.</p>
+<hr />
+<p>To be completed in Four Parts, Parts I. and II., price
+5<i>s.</i> each plain; 7<i>s.</i> 6<i>d.</i> coloured.</p>
+<p>ANTIQUARIAN GLEANINGS IN THE NORTH OF ENGLAND: being Examples of
+Antique Furniture, Plate, Church Decoration, Objects of Historical
+Interest, &amp;c. Drawn and etched by W.B. SCOTT.</p>
+<p>"A collection of antiquarian relics, chiefly in the decorative
+branch of art, preserved in the northern counties, portrayed by a
+very competent hand ... All are drawn with that distinctness which
+makes them available for the antiquarian, for the artist who is
+studying costume, and for the study of decorative
+art."&mdash;<i>Spectator.</i></p>
+<p>Parts III. and IV., completing the Work, are in preparation, and
+will be published shortly.</p>
+<p>GEORGE BELL, 186. Fleet Street.</p>
+<hr />
+<blockquote>
+<p>THE EDINBURGH REVIEW, No CLXXXVIII., will be publishd on
+THURSDAY, October 10th, 1850.</p>
+<p class="i2">I. HISTORY OF THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE.<br />
+II. THE UNITED STATES.<br />
+III. BRITISH MUSEUM: CATALOGUE OF PRINTED BOOKS.<br />
+IV. MURE'S CRITICAL HISTORY OF THE LANGUAGE<br />
+AND LITERATURE OF ANTIENT GREECE.<br />
+V. COL. CHESNEY'S EXPEDITION TO THE EUPHRATES AND TIGRIS.<br />
+VI. RECENT CLASSICAL ROMANCES.<br />
+VIII. DIFFICULTIES OF REPLUBLICAN FRANCE.<br />
+IX. HORACE AND TASSO.</p>
+<p>London: LONGMAN AND CO. Edinburgh: A. and C. BLACK.</p>
+</blockquote>
+<hr />
+<p>MR. L.A. LEWIS'S SALES for OCTOBER, 1850, FRIDAY 11TH., and
+SATURDAY 12th. Valuable Books, Architechural Books, Books of
+Prints, &amp;c., from the West of England, including Stuart and
+Revett's Antiquities of Athens, 4 vols.; unedited Antiuities of
+Attica; Piranesi Campus Martius Antiqua Orbis; Houghton Gallery, 2
+vols; Bowyer's Hume's England; Rogers' Collection of Prints, 2
+vols.; Knorr, Delici&aelig; Natur&aelig; Select&aelig;, 2 vols.;
+Tableaux Historiques de la R&eacute;volution Fran&ccedil;aise, 2
+vols.; Stow's London, by Strype, 2 vols.; Domesday Book, 2 vols.;
+Edmondson's Heraldry, 2 vols.; Illustrated London News, 11 vols.;
+Encyclop&aelig;dia Metropolitana, 29 vols.; Neale's Gentlemen's
+Seats, 6 vols.; Loddiges' Botanical Cabinet, 10 vols., large paper;
+Maund's Botanic Garden, 9 vols.; Sweet's Geraniums, 5 vols.;
+Beauties of England and Wales, 32 vols.; Hogarth's Works, 3 vols.,
+red morocco; Knight's London, 6 vols.; Retrospective Review, 14
+vols.; Bayle, Dictionnaire Historique, 16 vols.; Lodge's
+Illustrious Portraits, 10 vols.; Knight's Pictorial Bible, 3 vols.;
+Clarke's Commentary on the Bible, 6 vols.; a few Pictures and
+Prints, &amp;c.</p>
+<p>FRIDAY, 18TH, AND SATURDAY, 19TH.&mdash;Books, including the
+stock of the late Mr. C. Whiten.</p>
+<p>FRIDAY, 25TH,&mdash;Pictures, Prints, Books, Stereotype Plates,
+Copyrights, Books in Quires, &amp;c.</p>
+<p>Mr. C.A. Lewis will have Sales on each Friday in November and
+December.</p>
+<p>125. Fleet Street.</p>
+<hr />
+<p>Just published, Part 9, price 9<i>s.</i>, plain; Tinted, small
+paper, 10<i>s.</i> 6<i>d.</i>; Proof, large paper, 12<i>s.</i></p>
+<p>THE CHURCHES OF THE MIDDLE AGES: or, Select Specimens of Early
+and Middle Pointed Structures; with a few of the pures; Late
+Pointed Examples, Illustrated by Geometric and Perspective
+Drawings. By HENRY BOWMAN and J.S. CROWTHER, Architects. Containing
+Illustrations of St. Peter's Church, Thrukingham, Norfolk; St.
+John's, Cley, Norfolk; and St. Andrew's, Heckington,
+Lincolnshire.</p>
+<p>To be completed in Twenty Parts, each containing Six Plates,
+Imperial folio. Issued at intervals of two months.</p>
+<p>"Ewerby is a magnficent specimen of a Flowing Middle-Pointed
+Church. it is most perfectly measured and described: one can follow
+the most rcondite beauties of the construction, mouldings and
+joints, in these Plates, almost as well as in the original
+structure. Such a monograph as this will be of incalculable value
+to the architects of our Colonies or the United States, who have no
+means of access to ancient churches. The Plates are on stone, done
+with remarkable skill and distinctness. Of Heckington we can only
+say that the perspective view from the south-east presents a very
+vision of beauty; we can hardle conceive anything more perfect. We
+heartlily recommend this series to all who are able to patronize
+it."&mdash;<i>Ecclesiologist</i>, Oct. 1849.</p>
+<p>"This, if completed in a similar manner to the Parts now out,
+will be a beautiful and valuable work. The perspective of St.
+Andrew's, Heckington, is a charming specimen of lithography, by
+Hawkins. We unhesitatingly recommend Messrs. Bowman and Crowther's
+work to our readers, as likely to be useful to
+them."&mdash;<i>Builder</i>.</p>
+<p>London: GEORGE BELL, 186. Fleet Street.</p>
+<hr />
+<p>Printed by THOMAS CLARK SHAW, of No. 8. New Street Square, at
+No. 5. New Street Square, in the Parish of St. Bride in the City of
+London; and published by GEORGE BELL, of No. 186. Fleet Street, in
+the Parish of St. Dunstan in the West, in the City of London,
+Publisher, at No. 186. Fleet Street aforesaid.&mdash;Saturday,
+October 5. 1850.</p>
+<hr class="full" />
+
+<div>*** END OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK 13480 ***</div>
+</body>
+</html>
diff --git a/LICENSE.txt b/LICENSE.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..6312041
--- /dev/null
+++ b/LICENSE.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+This eBook, including all associated images, markup, improvements,
+metadata, and any other content or labor, has been confirmed to be
+in the PUBLIC DOMAIN IN THE UNITED STATES.
+
+Procedures for determining public domain status are described in
+the "Copyright How-To" at https://www.gutenberg.org.
+
+No investigation has been made concerning possible copyrights in
+jurisdictions other than the United States. Anyone seeking to utilize
+this eBook outside of the United States should confirm copyright
+status under the laws that apply to them.
diff --git a/README.md b/README.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..6f68e03
--- /dev/null
+++ b/README.md
@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
+Project Gutenberg (https://www.gutenberg.org) public repository for
+eBook #13480 (https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/13480)
diff --git a/old/13480-8.txt b/old/13480-8.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..ad1c756
--- /dev/null
+++ b/old/13480-8.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,2323 @@
+The Project Gutenberg EBook of Notes and Queries, Number 49, Saturday,
+Oct. 5, 1850, by Various
+
+This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with
+almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or
+re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included
+with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org
+
+
+Title: Notes and Queries, Number 49, Saturday, Oct. 5, 1850
+
+Author: Various
+
+Release Date: September 16, 2004 [EBook #13480]
+
+Language: English
+
+Character set encoding: ISO-8859-1
+
+*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK NOTES AND QUERIES ***
+
+
+
+
+Produced by The Internet Library of Early Journals, Jon Ingram, David
+King, and the Online Distributed Proofreading Team.
+
+
+
+
+
+NOTES AND QUERIES:
+
+A MEDIUM OF INTER-COMMUNICATION FOR LITERARY MEN, ARTISTS, ANTIQUARIES,
+GENEALOGISTS, ETC.
+
+ * * * * *
+
+"When found, make a note of."--CAPTAIN CUTTLE.
+
+ * * * * *
+
+No. 49.] SATURDAY, OCTOBER 5, 1850 [Price Threepence. Stamped Edition 4d.
+
+ * * * * * {289}
+
+
+CONTENTS.
+
+NOTES:--Page
+ Stray Notes on Cunningham's London. 289
+ Satirical Song upon Villiers Duke of Buckingham, by Dr. Rimbault. 291
+ Baker's Notes on Author of "Whole Duty of Man," by Rev. J.E.B. Mayor. 292
+ Mistake about George Wither, by Dr. Rimbault. 293
+ Useful _v._ Useless Learning. 293
+ Minor Notes:--Numerals--Junius and Sir P. Francis--Jews under the
+ Commonwealth--"Is any thing but," &c.--Fastitocalon. 294
+
+QUERIES:--
+ Bishop Cosin's Conference. 295
+ Engleman's "Bibliotheca Scriptorum Classicorum," by Professor De
+ Morgan. 296
+ Minor Queries:--Portrait of Sir P. Sidney--Confession--Scotch
+ Prisoners at Worcester--Adamson's Edward II.--Sir Thomas
+ Moore--Dr. E. Cleaver--Gwyan's London--Coronet--Cinderella--Judas'
+ Bell--Dozen of Bread--Kings Skuggsia--Coins of
+ Gandophares--Satirical Medals. 296
+
+REPLIES:--
+ Gaudentio di Lucca. 298
+ On a Passage in the Tempest, by J. Payne Collier. 299
+ Gray's Elegy. 300
+ Bishops and their Precedence. 301
+ Replies to Minor Queries:--Leicester and the reputed Poisoners of
+ his Time--What is the correct Prefix of Mayors--Marks of Cadency. 302
+
+MISCELLANEOUS:--
+ Notes on Books, Sales, Catalogues, &c. 303
+ Books and Odd Volumes Wanted. 303
+ Notices to Correspondents. 303
+ Advertisments. 304
+
+ * * * * *
+
+
+NOTES.
+
+STRAY NOTES ON CUNNINGHAM'S LONDON.
+
+The following notes are so trivial, that I should have scrupled to send
+them on any other ground than that so well-conceived and
+labouriously-executed a work should have its most minute and unimportant
+details as correct as possible. This, in such a work, can only be
+effected by each reader pointing out the circumstances that he has
+reason to believe are not quite correctly or completely given in it.
+
+Page 24. _Astronomical Society._--The library has been recently
+augmented by the incorporation with it of the books and documents (as
+well as the members) of the _Mathematical Society of London_
+(Spitalfields). It contains the most complete collection of the English
+mathematical works of the last century known to exist. A friend, who has
+examined them with some care, specifies particularly some of the tracts
+published in the controversy raised by Bishop Berkeley respecting "the
+ghosts of departed quantities," of which he did before know the
+existence.
+
+The instruments to which Mr. Cunningham refers as bequeathed to the
+Society, are not used there, nor yet allowed to lie unused. They are
+placed in the care of active practical observers, according as the
+special character of the instruments and the special subjects to which
+each observer more immediately devotes his attention, shall render the
+assignment of the instrument expedient. The instruments, however, still
+remain the property of the Society.
+
+P. 37. _Bath House._--Date omitted.
+
+P. 143.--Evan's Hotel, Covent Garden, is described as having been once
+the residence of "James West, the great collector of books, &c., and
+_President of the Royal Society_." There has certainly never been a
+President, or even a Secretary, of that name. However, it is just
+possible that there might have been a Vice-president so named (as these
+are chosen by the President from the members of the council, and the
+council has not always been composed of men of science): but even this
+is somewhat doubtful.
+
+P. 143. _Covent Garden Theatre._--No future account of this theatre will
+be complete without the facts connected with the ill-starred Delafield;
+just as, into the Olympic, the history of the defaulter Watts, of the
+Globe Assurance Office, must also enter.
+
+P. 143. near top of col. 2. "Heigho! says Kemble."--Before this period,
+a variation of the _rigmarole_ upon which this is founded had become
+poplular, from the humour of Liston's singing at Sadler's Wells. I have
+a copy of the music and the words; altogether identical with those in
+the music. Of these, with other matters connected with the {290} amorous
+frog, I shall have something more to say hereafter. This notice is to be
+considered incidental, rather than as referring expressly to Mr.
+Cunningham's valuable book.
+
+P. 153. _Deans Yard, Westminster._--Several of the annual budgets of
+abuse, obscenity, and impudent imposture, bearing on their title-pages
+various names, but written by "John Gadbury, Student in Physic and
+Astrology," were dated from "my house, Brick Court, Dean's Yard,
+Westminster;" or this slightly varied, occasionally being, "Brick Court,
+_near_ the Dean's Yard," &c. I have not seen a complete series of
+Gadbury's _Almanacks_, but those I refer to range from 1688 to 1694
+(incomplete). His burial in St. Margaret's, Westminster, in 1704, is
+noticed by Mr. Cunningham, at p. 313. As brick was then only used in the
+more costly class of domestic buildings, this would seem to indicate
+that _prophecy_ was then a lucrative trade; and that the successor and
+pupil of the "arch-rogue, William Lilly" was quite as fortunate in his
+speculations as his master had been. It is a truth as old as society
+itself, that "knaves grow rich while honest men starve." Whilst Gadbury
+was "wallowing in plenty," the author of _Hudibras_ was perishing for
+want of a crust!
+
+P. 153. _Denzil Street._--Here, about the middle of the street, on the
+south side, lived Theophilus Holdred, a jobbing watchmaker, whose name
+will always hold a place in one department of mathematical history. He
+discovered a method of approximating to the roots of numerical
+equations, of considerable ingenuity. He, however, lost in his day and
+generation the reputation that was really due to him for it, by his
+laying claim to more than he had effected, and seeking to deprive other
+and more gifted men of the reputation due to a more perfect solution of
+the same problem. He was, indeed, brought before the public as the tool
+of a faction; and, as the tools of faction generally are, he was
+sacrificed by his own supporters when he was no longer of any use to
+them.
+
+I once called upon him, in company with Professor Leyburn, of the Royal
+Military College, but I forget whether in 1829 or 1830. We found him at
+his bench--a plain, elderly, and heavy-looking personage. He seemed to
+have become "shy" of our class, and some time and some address were
+requisite to get him to speak with any freedom: but ultimately we placed
+him at his ease, and he spoke freely. We left him with the conviction
+that he was the _bonâ fide_ discoverer of his own method; and that he
+had no distinct conception, even then, of the principle of the methods
+which he had been led by his friends to claim, of having _also_
+discovered _Horner's_ process before Horner himself had published it. He
+did not (ten years after the publication of Horner's method) even then
+understand it. He understood his own perfectly, and I have not the
+slightest doubt of the correctness of his own statement, of its having
+been discovered by him fifty years before.
+
+P. 166. _Dulwich Gallery._--This is amongst the unfortunate consequences
+of taking lists upon trust. Poor Tom Hurst[1] has not been in the
+churchyard these last eight years--except the three last in his grave.
+The last five years of his life were spent in a comfortable asylum, as
+"a poor brother of the Charterhouse." He was one of the victims of the
+"panic of 1825;" and though the spirit of speculation never left him, he
+always failed to recover his position. He is referred to here, however,
+to call Mr. Cunningham's attention to the necessity, in a _Hand-book_
+especially, of referring his readers correctly to the places at which
+_tickets_ are to be obtained for any purpose whatever. It discourages
+the visitor to London when he is thus "sent upon a fool's errand;" and
+the Cockney himself is not in quite so good a humour with the author for
+being sent a few steps out of his way.
+
+P. 190. _Rogers_--a Cockney by inference. I {291} should like to see
+this more decidedly established. I am aware that it is distinctly so
+stated by Chambers and by Wilkinson; but a remark once made to me by
+Mrs. Glendinning (the wife of Glendinning, the printer, of Hatton
+Garden) still leads me to press the inquiry.
+
+P. 191.--_The Free Trade Club_ was dissolved before the publication of
+this edition of the _Handbook_.
+
+P. 192.--And to Sir John Herschel, on his return from the Cape of Good
+Hope.
+
+P. 210. _Royal Society._--From a letter of Dr. Charles Hutton, in the
+_Newcastle Magazine_ (vol. i. 2nd series), it appears that at the time
+of Dr. Dodd's execution the Fellows were in the habit of adjourning,
+after the meetings, to Slaughter's Coffee House, "to eat oysters," &c.
+The celebrated John Hunter, who had attempted to resuscitate the
+ill-fated Doctor, was one of them. "The Royal Society Club" was
+instituted by Sir Joseph Banks.
+
+P. 221. _Hanover Square._--Blank date.
+
+P. 337. _Millbank Prison._--It was designed, not by "Jeremy Bentham,"
+but by his brother, the great mechanist, Sir Samuel Bentham. In passing,
+it may be remarked that the Royal Military Academy, Woolwich, is
+constructed on the same principle, and, as was stated in the _Mechanics'
+Magazine_, on authority, a year or two ago, by the same engineer.
+General rumour has, however, attributed the design to his gracious
+Majesty George III; and its being so closely in keeping with the known
+spirit of _espionage_ of that monarch certainly gave countenance to the
+rumour. It may be as well to state, however, that, so designed and so
+built, it has never yet been so used.
+
+P. 428.--_Benbow_, not a native of Wapping, but of Shrewsbury. A life of
+him was published nearly forty years ago, by that veteran of local and
+county history, Mr. Charles Hulbert, in the _Salopian Magazine_.
+
+P. 499. _Whitfield._--Certainly not the founder of the Methodists, in
+the ordinary or recognised acceptation of the term. John Wesley was at
+the head of that movement from the very first, and George Whitfield and
+Charles Wesley were altogether subordinate to him. Wesley and Whitfield
+parted company on the ground of Arminianism _versus_ Calvinism. For a
+while the two sects kept the titles of "Arminian Methodists" and
+"Calvinistic Methodists." The latter made but little ground afterwards,
+and the distinctive adjective was dropped by the Wesleyans when the
+Whitfieldites had ceased to be a prominent body.
+
+P. 515. _Doctor Dodd._--The great interest excited in favour of a
+commutation of his sentence, led to the belief at the time, that his
+life had not been really sacrificed. Many plausible stories respecting
+the Doctor having been subsequently seen alive, were current; and as
+they may possibly in some future age be revived, and again pass into
+general currency, it may be as well to state that the most positive
+evidence to the contrary exists, in a letter of Dr. Hutton's before
+referred to. The _attempt to resuscitate him was actually made_, by a no
+less distinguished surgeon than John Hunter. He seemed then to attribute
+the failure to his having _received the body too late_. Wonderful
+effects were at that time expected to result from the discovery of
+galvanism; but it would have been wonderful indeed if any restoration
+had taken place after more than two hours of suspended animation. John
+Hunter, according to the account, does not seem to have been very
+communicative on the subject, even to his philosophical friends at
+Slaughter's Oyster Rooms.
+
+T.S.D.
+
+Shooter's Hill.
+
+[Footnote 1: It may not be out of place here to mention one fine feature
+in the character of "Tom Hurst;" his deep reverence for men of ability,
+whether in literature, science, or art. Take one instance:
+
+
+Fourteen or fifteen years ago, I called one morning at his place of
+business (then 65. St. Paul's Church Yard, which has been subsequently
+absorbed into the "Religious Tract Depository"); and, as was my custom,
+I walked through the shop to his private room. He was "not in;" but a
+gentleman, who first looked at me and then at a portrait of me on the
+wall, accosted me by my surname as familiarly as an intimate
+acquaintance of twenty years would have done. He and Hurst, it appeared,
+had been speaking of me, suggested by the picture, before Hurst went
+out. The familiar stranger did not keep me long in suspense--he
+intimated that I had "probably heard our friend speak of Ben Haydon." Of
+course I had; and we soon got into an easy chat. Hurst was naturally a
+common subject with us. Amongst the remarks he made were the following,
+and in almost the words:--
+
+"When my troubles came on, I owed Hurst a large sum of money; and the
+circumstances under which I became his debtor rendered this peculiarly a
+debt of honour. He lent it me when he could ill spare it; yet he is the
+only one of all my creditors who has not in one way or other persecuted
+me to the present hour. When he first knew of my wreck, he called upon
+me--_not to reproach but to encourage me_--and he would not leave me
+till he felt sure that he had changed the moody current of my thoughts.
+If there be any change in him since then, it is in his increased
+kindness of manner and his assiduity to serve me. He is now gone out to
+try to sell 'a bit of daub' for me."
+
+Hurst came in, and this conversation dropped; but it had been well had
+Hurst been by his side on the day his last picture was opened to view at
+the Egyptian Hall. The catastrophe of that night might have been
+averted, notwithstanding Mr. Barnum and his Tom Thumb show in the
+adjoining room.]
+
+ * * * * *
+
+SATIRICAL SONG UPON GEORGE VILLIERS, DUKE OF BUCKINGHAM.
+
+In turning over some old bundles of papers of the early part of the
+seventeenth century, I met with the following satirical effusion upon
+"James's infamous prime minister," George Villiers, Duke of Buckingham.
+As an echo of the popular feelings of the people at the time it was
+written, it merits preservation; and although I have seen other
+manuscript copies of the ballad, it has never yet, as far as I can
+learn, appeared in print.
+
+It appears to be a parody or paraphrase of a well-known ballad of the
+period, the burden of which attracted the notice of the satirist. It
+afterwards became a common vehicle of derision during the civil war, as
+may be seen by turning over the pages of the collection entitled _Rump
+Songs_, and the folio volumes of the king's pamphlets.
+
+The _original_ of these parodies has hitherto eluded my researches. It
+is not among the Pepysian, Roxburghe, Wood, or Douce ballads, but
+perhaps some of your readers may be able to point it out in some public
+or private collection.
+
+ "Come heare, Lady Muses, and help mee to sing,
+ Come love mee where I lay;
+ Of a duke that deserves to be made a king--
+ The cleane contrary way,
+ O the cleane contrary way.
+
+ "Our Buckingham Duke is the man that I meane,
+ Come love mee where I lay;
+ On his shoulders the weale of the kingdome doth leane--
+ The cleane contrary way,
+ O the cleane contrary way.
+
+ "O happiest kingdome that ever was kind,
+ Come love mee where I lay;
+ And happie the king that hath such a friend--
+ The cleane contrary way,
+ O the cleane contrary way. {292}
+
+ "Needs must I extoll his worth and his blood--
+ Come love mee where I lay;
+ And his sweet disposition soe milde and soe good--
+ The cleane contrary way,
+ O the cleane contrary way.
+
+ "Those innocent smiles that embelish his face,
+ Come love mee where I lay;
+ Who sees them not tokens of goodness and grace--
+ The cleane contrary way,
+ O the cleane contrary way.
+
+ "And what other scholler could ever arise,
+ Come love mee where I lay;
+ From a master that was soe sincere and wise--
+ The cleane contrary way,
+ O the cleane contrary way.
+
+ "Who is hee could now from his grave but ascend,
+ Come love mee where I lay;
+ Would surely the truth of his service commend--
+ The cleane contrary way,
+ O the cleane contrary way.
+
+ "The king understands how he honors his place,
+ Come love me where I lay;
+ Which is to his majestie noe little grace--
+ The cleane contrary way,
+ O the cleane contrary way.
+
+ "And therefore the government justly hath hee,
+ Come love mee where I lay;
+ Of horse for the land, and shipps for the sea--
+ The cleane contrary way,
+ O the cleane contrary way.
+
+ "What, though our fleet be our enemies debtor,
+ Come love mee where I lay;
+ Wee brav'd them once, and wee'l brave them better--
+ The cleane contrary way,
+ O the cleane contrary way.
+
+ "And should they land heere they should bee disjointed,
+ Come love mee where I lay;
+ And find both our horse and men bravely appointed--
+ The cleane contrary way,
+ O the cleane contrary way.
+
+ "Then let us sing all of this nobel duke's praise,
+ Come love mee where I lay;
+ And pray for the length of his life and his daies--
+ The cleane contrary way,
+ O the cleane contrary way.
+
+ "And when that death shall close up his eyes,
+ Come love mee where I lay;
+ God take him up into the skies--
+ The cleane contrary way,
+ O the cleane contrary way."
+
+EDWARD F. RIMBAULT.
+
+ * * * * *
+
+"WHOLE DUTY OF MAN," AUTHOR OF.
+
+(From Baker's MSS, vol. xxxv. p. 469-470. Cambridge University Library.)
+
+ "Octo'r 31. 1698. Mr. Thomas Caulton, Vicar of Worksop, &c. [as
+ in the note p. xiii. to the editor's Preface, ed. 1842, with
+ unimportant variations, such as _Madam Frances Heathcote_, where
+ the printed copy has _Mrs. Heathcote_; Baker reads _Madam Ayre
+ of Rampton after dinner took_, where the printed copy has, _Mrs.
+ Eyre_. After _was dead_, follows in Baker,] and that in that
+ Month she had buried her Husband and severall Relations, but
+ that her comfort was, that by her Monthly Sacraments she
+ participated still with them in the Communion of Saints.
+
+ "Then she went to her Closet, and fetched out a Manuscript, w'ch
+ she said was the original of the _Whole Duty of Man_, tied
+ together and stitched, in 8'vo, like Sermon notes. She untied
+ it, saying, it was Dr. Fell's Correction and that the Author was
+ the Lady Packington (her Mother), in whose hand it was written.
+
+ "To prove this, the s'd Mr. Caulton further added that she said,
+ she had shewn it to Dr. Covell, Master of Christ's College[2] in
+ Cambridge, Dr. Stamford, Preb. of York, and Mr. Banks the
+ present Incumbent of the Great Church in Hull. She added,
+ withall, that _The Decay of Christian Piety_ was hers (The Lady
+ Packington's) also, but disowned any of the rest to be her
+ Mother's.
+
+ "This is a true Copy of what I wrote, from Mr. Caulton's Mouth,
+ two days before his Decease.
+
+ "Witness my hand,
+
+ "Nov. 15. 98.
+
+ "JOHN HEWYT."
+
+ "Bp. Fell tells us, that all these Tracts were written by the
+ excellent Author (whom he makes to be one and the same person)
+ at severall times, as y'e exigence of the Church, and the
+ benefit of soules directed y'r composures; and that he (the
+ Author) did likewise publish them apart, in the same order as
+ they were made. The last, it seems (w'ch is _The Lively
+ Oracles_), came out in 1678, the very year Dr. Woodhead died.
+ Had the Author liv'd longer, we should have had his Tract _Of
+ the Government of the Thoughts_, a work he had undertaken; and
+ certainly (as Bp. Fell hath told us), had this work been
+ finished, 'twould have equall'd, if not excelled, whatever that
+ inimitable hand had formerly wrote. Withall it may be observ'd,
+ that the Author of these Tracts speaks of the great Pestilence,
+ and of the great Fire of London, both w'ch happen'd after the
+ Restoration, whereas Bp. Chappell died in 1649. And further, in
+ sect. vii. of the _Lively Oracles_, n. 2., are these words, w'ch
+ I think cannot agree to Bp. Chappell [and less to Mr. Woodhead].
+ _I would not be hasty in charging Idolatry upon the Church of
+ Rome, or all in her Communion; but that their Image-Worship is a
+ most futall snare, in w'ch vast numbers of unhappy Souls are
+ taken, no Man can doubt, who hath with any Regard travailed in
+ Popish Countries: I myself, and thousands of others, whom the
+ late troubles, or other occasions, sent abroad, are, and have
+ been witnesses thereof_. {293} These words seem to have been
+ spoke by one that had been at Rome, and was forced into those
+ Countries after the troubles broke out here. But as for
+ Chappell, he never was at Rome, nor in any of those Countries.
+
+ "As for Archbp. Stern, no Man will believe him to have any just
+ Title to any of these Tracts. [The last Passage concerning
+ idolatry, will not agree with Mr. Woodhead, nor the rest with
+ Lady Packington.]
+
+ "In a letter from Mr. Hearne, dat. Oxon, Mar. 27, 1733, said by
+ Dr. Clavering, Bp. of Petr. to be wrote by one Mr. Basket, a
+ Clergyman of Worcestershire. See Dr. Hamond's _Letters_
+ published by Mr. Peck, et ultra Quære."
+
+On so disputed a point as the authorship of the _Whole Duty of Man_,
+your readers will probably welcome any discussion by one so competent to
+form an opinion in such matters as Hearne.
+
+The letter above given was unknown to the editor of Mr. Pickering's
+edition.
+
+J.E.B. MAYOR.
+
+Marlborough College.
+
+[Footnote 2: The printed copy has _Trinity_ College.]
+
+ * * * * *
+
+MISTAKE ABOUT GEORGE WITHER.
+
+In Campbell's _Notices of the British Poets_ (edit. 1848 p. 234.) is the
+following, passage from the short memoir of George Wither:--
+
+ "He was even afraid of being put to some mechanical trade, when
+ he contrived to get to London, and with great simplicity had
+ proposed to try his fortune at court. To his astonishment,
+ however, he found that it was necessary to flatter in order to
+ be a courtier. To show his independence, he therefore wrote his
+ _Abuses Whipt and Stript_, and, instead of rising at court, was
+ committed for some months to the Marshalsea."
+
+The author adds a note to this passage, to which Mr. Peter Cunningham
+(the editor of the edition to which I refer) appends the remark inclosed
+between brackets:--
+
+ "He was imprisoned for his _Abuses Whipt and Stript_; yet this
+ could not have been his first offence, as an allusion is made to
+ a former accusation. [It was for _The Scourge_ (1615) that his
+ first known imprisonment took place.]"
+
+I cannot discover upon any authority sufficient ground for Mr.
+Campbell's note resecting a _former_ accusation against Wither. He was
+undoubtedly imprisoned for his _Abuses Whipt and Stript_, which first
+appeared in print in 1613, but I do not think an _earlier_ offence can
+be proved against him. It has been supposed, upon the authority of a
+passage in the _Warning Piece to London_, that the first edition of this
+curious work appeared in 1611; but I am inclined to think that the
+lines,--
+
+ "In sixteen hundred ten and one,
+ I notice took of public crimes,"
+
+refers to the period at which the "Satirical Essays" were _composed_.
+Mr. Willmott, however (_Lives of the Sacred Poets_, p. 72.), thinks that
+they point to an earlier publication. But it is not likely that Wither
+would so soon again have committed himself by the publication of the
+_Abuses_ in 1613, if he had suffered for his "liberty of speech" so
+shortly before.
+
+Mr. Cunningham's addition to Mr. Campbell's note is incorrect. The
+_Scourge_ is part of the _Abuses Whipt and Stript_ printed in 1613 (a
+copy of which is now before me), to which it forms a postscript. Wood,
+who had never seen it, speaks of it as a _separate_ publication; but Mr.
+Willmott has corrected this error, although he had only the means of
+referring to the edition of the _Abuses_ printed in 1615. Mr.
+Cunningham's note, that Wither was imprisoned for the _Scourge_ in 1615,
+is a mistake; made, probably, by a too hasty perusal of Mr. Willmott's
+charming little volume on our elder sacred poets.
+
+EDWARD F. RIMBAULT.
+
+ * * * * *
+
+USEFUL VERSUS USELESS LEARNING
+
+A single and practical plan for the formation of a complete and useful
+library and _respository_ of _universal_ literary knowledge.
+
+The design which I propose in the following few lines, is one which I
+should imagine nearly all the more learned and literary of your readers
+would _wish_ to see _already in existence_ and when I show that it might
+be effected _with very little trouble and expense_ (indeed _no_ trouble
+but such as would be a _pleasure_ to those interested in the work), and
+that the greatest advantage would follow from it,--I hope that it may
+meet with favourable consideration from some of the numerous, able, and
+influential readers and correspondents of your journal.
+
+I am the more induced to hope this from the fact of such a wish having
+been partially expressed by some of your contributors, and the excellent
+leading articles of Nos. 1 and 2.
+
+What I propose is simply this: the SYSTEMATIC ARRANGEMENT of _all_ the
+existing literary knowledge in the world that is considered _of value_
+by those best qualified to judge, disposed in such a manner as to answer
+these two purposes: 1st, to give a general connected and classified
+_view_ of the literary treasures of the whole world, beginning from the
+most ancient in each language and department (including only what is
+valuable in each); and, 2dly, to afford the greatest possible _facility_
+(by means of arrangement, references and _indexes_) to every inquirer
+for finding _at once_ the information he is in search of, if it is to be
+found _anywhere_ by looking for it.
+
+There are two ways in which this work might be accomplished, both of
+which were desirable, though even one only would be much better than
+none.
+
+The first and most complete is, to make a real COLLECTION of all those
+works, arranged in the {294} most perfect systematic order; and, while
+doing so, to make at the same time a corresponding classified
+_Catalogue_.
+
+The chief (and almost the only) _difficulty_ in the way of this would
+be, to find a _room_ (or suite of rooms) to contain such a library and
+repository; but such would probably be found if sought.
+
+The other way in which this object might be attained is by the formation
+of a simple CATALOGUE in the same order, such as does already exist and
+lies open for public use (though only in manuscript, and not so
+accurately classified as might be) in the noble library of the Dublin
+University.
+
+This plan would be _far easier_ than (besides forming the best possible
+_basis_ for) that so urgently advocated by MR. BOLTON CORNEY (Vol. i.
+pp. 9, 42, 43.).
+
+Of course so extensive a design would require to be distributed among
+many hundred persons; but so does any great work: while, by each
+individual undertaking that department in which he is most interested
+and most experienced, the whole might be accomplished easily and
+pleasantly.
+
+The great fault of antiquarians is, that they are constantly _beginning
+at the wrong end_: they fix on some one piece of information that they
+want to get, and devote a world of labour to hunting about in all
+directions for anything bearing on the subject; whereas the rational way
+obviously is, to have the whole existing mass of (valuable) knowledge
+_classified_, and then the inquirer would know _where_ to look for his
+purpose.
+
+Of course there will always remain much knowledge of a miscellaneous and
+irregular nature which is picked up by accident, and does not come
+within the scope of the present design; but this is generally of a
+trifling and fugitive kind, and does not at all controvert the principle
+above laid down.
+
+In conclusion, I have worked out a tolerably complete series of
+arrangements for the above design, showing its practicability as well as
+usefulness, which will be much at the service of any one who can use
+them for the furtherance of that object.
+
+W. D.
+
+ * * * * *
+
+MINOR NOTES.
+
+_Numerals._--For the old Indian forms, see Prinsep's _Journal Asiatic
+Soc. Bengal_, 1838, p. 348. The prospectus of _Brugsh, Numerorum apud
+Egyptios Demoticorum Doctrina_, Berlin, promises to give from papyri and
+inscriptions not only the figures, but the forms of operation. Probably
+the system assumed its present form by the meeting of the Indian and
+Egyptian traders at some emporium near the mouth of the Indus. Peacock
+seems to give undue weight to the fact, that the Tibetans have a copious
+nomenclature for high numbers: their arithmetic, doubtless, came with
+their alphabet, and the Buddhist legends from India.
+
+F.Q.
+
+
+_Junnius and Sir Philip Francis._--A few years ago, an aged intelligent
+person named Garner was living at Belgrave, near Leicester. I have heard
+him say that, when he was a farm bailiff to Lord Thanet, at Sevenoaks,
+in Kent, Sir Philip Francis was a frequent visitor there, and had a
+private room set apart for literary occupation. On one occasion, when he
+(Mr. Garner) was riding over the farm with Sir Philip Francis, the
+former alluded to one of the replies to Junius, by a clergyman who had
+been the subject of the "Great Unknown's" anonymous attacks, adding,
+"They say, Sir Philip, you are Junius." Sir Philip did not deny that he
+was the man, but simply smiled at the remark. This, and other
+circumstances coupled with the fact of Sir Philip's frequent visits to
+the house of so noted a politician as Lord Thanet, rendered Mr. Garner a
+firm believer in the identity of Sir Philip and Junius to the end of his
+days.
+
+JAYTEE.
+
+
+_Jews under the Commonwealth_ (Vol. i., pp. 401. 474.; vol ii., p.
+25.).--There is a confirmation of the story of the Jews being in treaty
+for St. Paul's and the Oxford Library in a passage in Carte's _Letters_,
+i. 276, April 2, 1649:--
+
+ "They are about demolishing and selling cathedral churches. I
+ hear Norwich is designed already, and that the Jews proffer
+ 600,000l. for Paul's and Oxford Library, and may have them for
+ 200,000l. more."
+
+CH.
+
+
+"_Is anything but," &c._--As your work seems adapted, amongst other
+subjects, to check the introduction into our language of undesirable
+words, phrases, and forms of speech, I would call the attention of your
+readers to the modern phrases, "is anything but," and the like, which
+have lately crept into use, and will be found, in many (otherwise)
+well-written books.
+
+I read the phrase "is anything but," for the first time, in Napier's
+_Peninsular War_; where it struck me as being so much beneath the
+dignity of historical composition, and at the same time asserting an
+impossibility, that I meditated calling the author's attention to it.
+The not unfrequent use of the same phrase by other writers, since that
+time, has by no means reconciled me to its use.
+
+In the _Edinburgh Review_ for January last (1850) I find the following
+sentence:--"But as pains have been taken to fix the blame _upon any one
+except_ the parties culpable;" and in the July number of the same
+_Review_ (p. 90.) occurs the sentence, "_any impulse rather than_ that of
+patriotism," &c.
+
+Now, a "thing," or "person," or "impulse,"--though it may not be the
+"thing," or "person," or "impulse" charged as the agent,--must yet be
+some _certain_ and _specific_ thing, or party, or impulse, {295} if
+existing as an agent at all in the matter; and cannot be "_any_ thing,"
+or "_any_ party," or "_any_ impulse," in the _indefinite_ sense intended
+in these phrases. Moreover, there seems no difficulty in expressing, in
+a simple and direct manner, that the agent was a very different, or
+opposite, or dissimilar "thing," or "person," or "impulse" from that
+supposed.
+
+I wish some persons of competent authority in the science of our
+language (and many such there are who write in your pages) would take up
+this subject, with a view to preserve the purity of it; and would also,
+for the future, exercise a watchful vigilance over the use, for the
+_first_ time, of any incorrect, or low words or phrases, in composition;
+and so endeavour to confine them to the vulgar, or to those who ape the
+vulgar in their style.
+
+P.H.F.
+
+
+_Fastitocalon._--_Fastitocalon. Cod. Exon._ fol. 96. b. p. 360. 18. read
+[Greek: Aspido ... chelonae]. Tychsen, _Physiologus Syrus_, cap. xxx.:
+did the digamma get to Crediton by way of Cricklade?
+
+F.Q.
+
+ * * * * *
+
+
+QUERIES
+
+BISHOP COSIN'S CONFERENCE.
+
+Basire in his _Dead Man's Real Speech_ (pp. 59, 60.), amongst other
+"notable instances" of Bishop Cosin's zeal and constancy in defence of
+the Church of England, mentions
+
+ "A solemn conference both by word and writing betwixt him and
+ the Prior of the English Benedictines at Paris, supposed to be
+ Robinson. The argument was concerning the validity of the
+ ordination of our priests, &c., in the Church of England. The
+ issue was, our Doctor had the better so far, that he could never
+ get from the Prior any reply to his last answer. This conference
+ was undertaken to fix a person of honour then wavering about
+ that point; the sum of which conference (as I am informed), was
+ written by Dr. Cosin to Dr. Morley, the now Right Reverend Lord
+ Bishop of Winchester, in two letters bearing date June 11, July
+ 11, 1645."
+
+The substance of this conference has been preserved among the Smith
+Manuscripts in the Bodleian Library; but it is not in the form of
+letters to Dr. Morley. Vol. xl. of this valuable collection of
+manuscripts contains (as described in Smith's table of contents):--
+
+ 1. "Papers of Bp. Cosins in defence of the Ordination of the
+ Church of England against father Prior.
+
+ "The first of these is Bp. Cosin's Review of the Father's
+ Letter, &c. [the title-page is placed at p. 77.]
+
+ "Then follows a letter (which is indeed the Bishop's first
+ paper, and should be put first) from Bishop Cosin to the Father.
+
+ "After that the Father's Answer to Bishop Cosin's Review at p.
+ 81.
+
+ "Then come two other papers about the validity of our
+ Ordination, with a preface concerning the occasion, p. 89."
+
+ 2. "Then, p. 101., A Letter from a _Rom. Cath._ to a Lady about
+ communicating in one kind,--with Bishop Cosin's Answer."
+
+ 3. "Lastly, in p. 123., is A Letter of Bp. Cosin's to Dr.
+ Collins concerning the Sabbath."
+
+The order in which the papers under the first head, about our English
+ordination, should fall, appears to be as follows:--
+
+1. There is a note attached to p. 65., evidently written by Dr. Tho.
+Smith himself in the following words:
+
+ "Transcript of several papers of Bishop Cosin's sent to me by
+ Dr. J. Smith, Prebendary of Durham.--T.S."
+
+2. At p. 77. the title-page is given thus:
+
+ "A Review of a Letter sent from F.P.R. to a Lady (whom he would
+ have persuaded to the Rom. party) in Opposition to a former
+ paper given him for the defence of the Church of England in the
+ Ordination of Priests."
+
+To this are appended the respective forms of ordering priests used in
+the Church of England and in the Roman Church.
+
+3. Then, at p. 89., we have the "occasion of this ... Discourse
+concerning the Ordination of Priests," &c. This is a kind of preface,
+which contains the first paper that was given to the Prior, dated June
+14, 1645; also another paper, bearing date July 11, 1645, but ending
+abruptly in the middle of a sentence, and having written below it
+(probably in Dr. J. Smith's hand) the following note:
+
+ "The rest of this is not yet found, and that which is written
+ thus far is not in the Bishop's own hand, but the copy is very
+ fair."
+
+However, this second paper (ending thus abruptly) appears to be no more
+than the first draft of a long letter from Cosin to the Prior, which
+commences at p. 65. of this MS., and which is dated "from the Court of
+S. Germains, July 11, 1645;" for not only does this letter bear the same
+_date_ as the before-mentioned fragment, but it begins by complaining of
+the tone of expression in a letter evidently received from the Prior
+after the draft had been prepared, but before it was sent off; and it
+concludes with the following note appended as a postscript:
+
+ "Sir,
+
+ "The enclosed (most of it) was prepared for you a fortnight
+ since; but now (upon the occasion given by your letter) you have
+ it with some advantage from
+
+ "Your servt., J.C.
+
+ "I desire the fav"
+
+ "S. Germ. July 12."
+
+4. The most important part of this MS., however, is contained in the
+long letter or treatise {296} placed first in the volume, and bearing
+for its title, "A View of F.P.'s Answer to the First Paper."
+
+This is dated from S. Germains, July 25, 1645 and would appear to be
+Cosin's last letter. But, if it be really so, Basire must, I think, be
+in error, when he says, "Our Doctor ... could never get from the Prior
+any reply to his last answer." For at p. 81. of the MS. there is a reply
+to the above "Review of a Letter sent by F.R. to a Lady," &c. which,
+though copied without either date or signature, was evidently written by
+the Prior, whilst it professes to be a reply to a treatise closely
+answering to Cosin's letter of July 25, but which letter the writer did
+not receive (as he states) before the 26th of September.
+
+I wish yet further to take notice, that Dr. Tho. Smith, in His _Vitæ_
+(Lond. 1707, præf. pp. vii, viii.), refers to these manuscripts in the
+following satisfactory manner:--
+
+ "Cum, post mortem D. Cosini, de pretio et valore schedarum, quas
+ reliquit, hæredibus non satis constaret, ... auspieatò tandem
+ devenit, ut favore, beneficio, et perquam insigni humanitate
+ reverendi et doctissimi viri, D. Joannis Smith, Sacræ Theologiæ
+ Professoris Ecclesiæ Dunelmensis Præbendarii, quorum frequens
+ hac de re commercium literarum, occasione data, (opportunè
+ intercedente prænobili et reverendo, D. Georgio Whelero, equite
+ aurato, et Ecclesiæ Anglicanæ Presbytero, ejusdem quoque
+ Ecclesiæ Cathedralis Prebendario), habui, duos libellos (tanquam
+ prætiosas tabulas ab isthoc infami naufragio servatas) a D.
+ Cosino, dum in Galliâ exularet, Anglieè conscriptos jam
+ possidieam: quarum unus _Vindicias Ordinatianum Ecclesieæ
+ Anglicanæ_ contra exceptiones et cavillationes cujusdem
+ Pontificii sacerdotis e gente nostra, alter _Responsionem ad
+ Epistolam_ nobili fæminæ Anglæ ab alio saccrdote _pro defensione
+ communionis sub unicâ specie administrandæ_ inscriptam,
+ complectitur," &c.
+
+I should still be glad to add to this long note the followng Queries:--
+
+1. Can any of your readers kindly inform me whether Cosin's two letters
+to Dr. Geo. Morley are still in existence, either in MS. or in print?
+
+2. Whether there be any fuller or more authentic account of the
+controversy than that in these MS. preserved by the care of Dr. Smith?
+
+3. Whether Cosin wrote any letter to the Prior _later_ than that of July
+25?
+
+4. Who was the _lady_ the Prior wished to seduce to the Roman party?
+
+5. Is there any other account of the controversy?
+
+J. SANSOM.
+
+ * * * * *
+
+ENGELMAN'S BIBILIOTHECA SCRIPTORUM CLASSICORUM.
+
+A little while ago, I ordered Engelman's _Bibliotheca Scriptoram
+Classicorum_, purporting to contain all such works published from 1700
+to 1846. It was furnished to my bookseller by a foreign bookseller in
+_London_ with an English title, having _his own_ name on it as
+publisher, and an invitation to purchase the books described in it _from
+him_. As the paper and type were German, I objected and received in
+consequence a new English title, with the same name upon it, and a
+_shorter_ invitation to purchase from him. I was captious enough to
+object even to this; and I then received a Leipzig title in German. But
+there still remains a difficulty: for this German title has also the
+name of a _Parisian_ bookseller upon it, _a la maison duquel on peut
+s'adresser, &c._ Now, as Engelman is a bookseller, and would probably
+not object to an order out of his own catalogue, of which he is both
+author and publisher, the preceding, circumstances naturally raise the
+following Queries:
+
+1. What is the real title-page of Engelman's _Catalogue_ 2. Is the
+Parisian house accredited by Engelman; or has the former served the
+latter as the London house has Served both? 3. Is it not desirable that
+literary men should set their faces very decidedly against all and every
+the slightest alteration in the genuine description of a book? 4. Would
+it not be desirable that every such alteration should forthwith be
+communicate to your paper?
+
+The English title-page omits the important fact, that the _Catalogue_
+begins at 1700, and describes it as containing _all_ editions, &c., up
+to 1846.
+
+A. DE MORGAN.
+
+September 24. 1850.
+
+ * * * * *
+
+MINOR QUERIES.
+
+_Portrait of Sir P. Sidney, by Paul Veronese._--In the letters of Sir P.
+Sidney which I found at Hamburg, and which were published by Pickering,
+1845, it is stated that a portrait of Sidney was painted by Paul
+Veronese, at Venice, for Herbert Languet. It would be very interesting
+to discover the existence of this picture.
+
+Languet had it with him at Prague, _framed_, as he asserts, and hung up
+in his room, in the year 1575. He remarks upon it, in one place, that it
+represented Sidney as too young (he was nineteen when it was taken); in
+another place he says that it has given him too sad an expression. I
+should add, that on Languet's death, his property passed into the hands
+of his friend Du Plessis.
+
+I am led to write to you on this subject, by having observed, a few days
+since, in the collection at Blenheim, two portraits by Paul Veronese, of
+persons unknown. There may be many such, and that of Sir Philip Sidney
+may yet be identified.
+
+STEUART A. PEARS.
+
+Harrow, Sept. 6.
+
+
+_Confession._--You would much oblige if you could discover the name of a
+Catholic priest, in {297} German history, who submitted to die rather
+than reveal a secret committed to him in confession?
+
+U.J.B.
+
+
+_Scotch Prisoners at Worcester._--In Mr. Walcott's _History of St.
+Margaret's Church, Westminster_, I find the following extract from
+church wardens' accounts:--
+
+ "1652. P'd to Thos. Wright for 67 loads of soyle laid on the
+ graves in Tothill Fields, wherein 1200 Scotch prisoners, taken
+ at the fight at Worcester, were buried; and for other pains
+ taken with his teeme of horses, about mending the Sanctuary
+ Highway, when Gen. Ireton was buried."
+
+I have taken the pains to verify this extract, and find the figures
+quite correctly given. I wish to put the Query: Is this abominable
+massacre in cold blood mentioned by any of our historians? But for such
+unexceptionable evidence, it would appear incredible.
+
+C.F.S.
+
+
+_Adamson's Reign of Edward II._--
+
+ "The Reigns of King Edward II., and so far of King Edward III.,
+ as relates to the Lives and Actions of Piers Gaveston, Hugh de
+ Spencer, and Roger Lord Mortimer, with Remarks thereon adapted
+ to the present Time: Humbly addressed to all his Majesty's
+ Subjects of Great Britain, &c., by _J. Adamson_. Printed for J.
+ Millar, near the Horse Guards, 1732, and sold by the Booksellers
+ of London and Westminster, price One Shilling."
+
+The above is the title-page of a little work of eighty-six pages in my
+possession, which I am inclined to think is scarce. It appears to be a
+defence of the Walpole administration from the attacks of the
+_Craftsman_, a periodical of the time, conducted by Amhurst, who was
+supported by Bolinbroke and Pulteney, the leaders of the opposition. Is
+anything known of _J. Adamson_, the author?
+
+H.A.E.
+
+
+_Sir Thomas Moore._--Can any of your readers give any account of Sir
+Thomas Moore, beyond what Victor tells of him in his _History_ of the
+Theatre, ii. p. 144., "that he was the author of an absurd tragedy
+called _Mangora_ (played in 1717), and was knighted by George I."
+
+In Pope's "Epistle to Arbuthnot," he writes--
+
+ "Arthur, whose giddy son leglects the laws."
+
+on which Warburton notes--
+
+ "_Arthur Moore, Esq._"
+
+Who was _Arthur Moore, Esq._? and who was the "giddy son?" Was the
+latter _James Moore Smith_ a gentleman whose family name was, I think,
+_Moore_, and who assumed (perhaps for a fortune) the additional name of
+_Smith_? This gentleman Pope seems to call indiscriminately _Moore_,
+_Moor_, and _More_: and when he says that his good nature towards the
+dunces was so great that he had even "rhymed for Moor" (Ib. v. 373.), I
+cannot but suspect that the Moor _for_ whom he had _rhymed_, was the
+_giddy son_ whom _Arthur_ accused him of seducing from the law to the
+Muses. There are many allusions to this Mr. James Moore Smith throughout
+Pope's satirical works, but all very obscure; and Warburton, though he
+appears to have known him, affords no explanation as to who or what he
+was. He was the author of a comedy called _The Rival Modes_.
+
+C.
+
+
+_Dr. E. Cleaver, Bishop of Cork._--I shall feel much obliged to any of
+your correspondents who will furnish me with the particulars of the
+consecration of Dr. Euseby Cleaver to the sees of Cork and Ross, in
+March, April, or May, 1789. Finding no record of the transaction in the
+Diocesan Registry of Cork, and not being able to trace it in any other
+part of _Ireland_, I am induced to believe that this consecration may
+have taken place in _England_; and shall be very glad to be correctly
+informed upon the point.
+
+H. COTTON.
+
+Thurles, Ireland.
+
+
+_Gwynn's London and Westminster._--Mr. Thomas Frederick Hunt, in his
+_Exemplars of Tudor Architecture_, 4to. London, 1830, in a note at p.
+23., alludes to _London and Westminster improved, by John Gywnn,
+London_, 1766, 4to., and has this remark:
+
+ "It is a singular fact, that in this work John Gwynn pointed out
+ almost all the designs for the improvement of London, which have
+ been _devised_ by the civil and military architects of the
+ present day."
+
+And Mr. Hunt concludes by observing,, that--
+
+ "This discovery was made by the _Literary Gazette_."
+
+Will you permit me, through the medium of your useful publication, to
+solicit information of the number and date of the _Literary Gazette_
+which recalled public attention to this very remarkable fact?
+
+§N.
+
+
+_Coronet._--In Newbold Church, in the county of Warwick, is a monument
+to the memory of Thomas Boughton of Lawford, and Elizabeth his wife,
+representing him in a suit of armour, with sword and spurs, _a coronet
+on his head_, and a bear at his feet, chained and muzzled. Query.--Can
+any of your readers give an accurate description of this coronet? Or can
+any of them mention instances of the monuments of esquires having
+similar coronets? The date of his death is not given: his wife died in
+the year 1454.
+
+Z.
+
+
+_Cinderella._--Referring to Vol. ii., p. 214., allow me to ask in what
+edition of Perrault's _Fairy Tales_ the misprint of _verre_ from _vair_
+first occurs? what is the date of their first publication, as well as
+that of the translation under the title of _Mother Goose's Tales_?
+whether Perrault was the originator of _Cinderella_, or from what source
+he drew the tale? {298} what, moreover, is the authority for identifying
+_sable_ with _vair_ for the employment of either in designating the
+highest rank of princesses?
+
+SANDVICENSIS.
+
+
+_Judas' Bell, Judas' Candle_ (Vol. i., pp. 195. 235. 357.).--Some time
+since I asked the meaning of a Judas' Bell, and your learned
+correspondent CEPHAS replied that it was only a bell so christened after
+St. Jude, the apostle. However, it may have been connected with the
+Judas' tapers, which, according, to the subjoined entries, were used
+with the Paschal candle at Easter. May I trust to his kindness to
+explain its purport?
+
+ "_Reading Parish Accompts_.
+
+ "1499. Itm. payed for making leng' Mr. Smyth's molde wt. a Judas
+ for the Pascall--vJd."
+
+ "_St. Giles' Parish Accompts_.
+
+ "A.D. 1514. Paid for making a Judas for Pascall iiijd."
+
+ "_Churchwardens' Accompts of S. Martin, Outwich_.
+
+ "1510. Paid to Randolf Merchaunt Wex Chandiler for the Pascall,
+ the tapers affore the Rode, the Cross Candelles, and Judas
+ Candelles--viiijs. iiijd."
+
+ "_St. Margaret's, Westminster._
+
+ "1524. Item payed for xij. Judacis to stand with the tapers--O
+ ijd. O"
+
+MACKENZIE WALCOTT, M.A., Oxon.
+
+
+_Dozen of Bread; Baker's Dozen._--In the _Chronicle of Queen Jane, and
+of Two Years of Queen Mary_, lately printed for the Camden Society
+(Appendix iv. p. 112.), it is stated that, amongst other particulars in
+the accounts of the Chamberlain of Colchester, at which place Mary was
+entertained on her way to London, there is:--"For xxxviii. _dozen of
+bread_, xxxixs." In the language of the county from which I write, "a
+dozen of bread" was (and I believe is yet) used to express either one
+loaf, value twelvepence or two loaves, value sixpence each: and even
+when the sizes and price of the loaves varied, it was used to express
+the larger loaf, or the two smaller loaves. A dozen of bread was also
+divided into six twopenny, or twelve penny loaves.
+
+But in the quotation above, thirty-eight dozen of bread are charged
+thirty-nine shillings; whereas the extra one shilling, cannot be divided
+into aliquot parts, so as to express the value of each of the
+thirty-eight dozen of bread.
+
+What was a dozen of bread in 1553?
+
+What is a _baker's dozen_, and why so called?
+
+P.H.F.
+
+
+_Kongs skuggsia._--Is anything, precise known of the date and origin of
+the Icelandic Kongs skuggsia.
+
+F.Q.
+
+
+_Coins of Gandophares._--Coins of Gandophares, an Indian prince, are
+described by Prinsep, _Jour. Asiatic Soc. Bengal_, and in Wilson's
+_Asiana_. The name is met with in the legends of St. Thomas can it be
+found elsewhere?
+
+F.Q.
+
+
+_Satirical Medals._--Is any printed account to be found of a very
+elaborately executed series of caricature medals relating to the
+revolution of 1688?
+
+F.Q.
+
+ * * * * *
+
+
+REPLIES.
+
+GAUDENTIO DI LUCCA.
+
+(Vol. ii., p. 247.)
+
+The work entitled _The Adventures of Sig. Gaudentio di Lucca_ was
+published at London in 1737, in 1 vol. 8vo. It purports to be a
+translation from the Italian, by E.T. Gent but this is a mere fiction.
+The work is evidently an English composition. It belongs to the class of
+_Voyages Imaginaires_, and its main object is to describe the
+institutions and manners of the Mezoranians, an Utopian community,
+supposed to exist in the centre of Africa. Sig. Gaudentio is able, by an
+accident, to visit this people, by the way of Egypt, and to return to
+Europe; he resides at Bologna, where he falls under the suspicion of the
+Inquisition, and having been brought before that tribunal, he describes
+his former life, and his adventures in the country of the Mezoranians.
+
+A second London edition of this work, of the date of 1748, is mentioned
+in the _Gentleman's Magazine_ for Jan. 1777. There is an edition in
+12mo., printed at Edinburgh, 1761. And there is another London edition,
+in 8vo., of the year 1786. Copies of the editions of 1737 and 1786 are
+in the British Museum.
+
+There are two French translations of the work. One is of the date 1746,
+under the title of _Mémoires de Gaudentio di Lucca_. The second, of
+1754, by M. Dupuy Demportes, speaks of the first having been made by an
+Englishman named _Milts_; but the person and name appear to be
+fictitious. The first translation is said by Barbier, _Dict. des
+Anonymes_, No. 11,409, to have been revised by the Chevalier de Saint
+Germain, who made additions to it of his own invention. The second
+translation is reprinted in the collection of _Voyages Imaginaires_,
+Amsterdam et Paris, 1787, tom. vi.
+
+An anonymous writer in the _Gent. Mag._ for Jan. 1777, vol. xlvii., p.
+13., speaking of Bishop Berkeley, says that "the _Adventures of Signor
+Gaudentio di Lucca_ have been generally attributed to him." The writer
+of the note added to the _Life of Berkeley_ in Kippis's _Biogr. Brit._,
+1780, vol. ii. p. 261., quotes this statement, and adds that the work is
+ascribed to him by the booksellers in their printed catalogues. This
+writer thinks that the authorship of Bp. Berkeley is consistent with the
+internal evidence of the book but he furnishes no positive testimony on
+the subject. {299}
+
+In a letter from Mr. J.C. Walker to Mr. Pinkerton, of 19 Jan., 1799
+(published in Pinkerton's _Literary Correspondence_, vol. ii., p. 41.),
+Lord Charlemont is referred to as believing that Gaudentio di Lucca is
+founded in fact; that Bishop Berkeley, when he was at Cairo, conversed
+with persons who had attended a caravan, and that he learned from them
+what he narrated in the account of Gaudentio. This passage is cited in
+Southey's _Common-place Book_, p. 204; but the work is manifestly
+fictitious, and it does not appear that Berkeley, though he twice
+visited the Continent, was ever out of Europe.
+
+The date of the publication of Gaudentio is quite consistent with the
+authorship of Berkeley, who died in 1753; but the notice in the
+_Gentleman's Magazine_ only proves the existence of a rumour to that
+effect; and the authentic _Life of Berkeley_, by Dr. Stock, chiefly
+drawn up from materials communicated by Dr. R. Berkeley, brother to the
+Bishop, and prefixed to the collected edition of his work (2 vols. 4to.
+Lond., 1784), makes no allusion to Gaudentio. There is nothing in the
+contents of this work which renders it likely that the authorship should
+have been carefully concealed by Bp. Berkeley and his family, if he had
+really been the author. The literary execution of Gaudentio is good; and
+it is probable that the speculative character of the work, and the fact
+that Berkeley had visited Italy, suggested the idea that he had composed
+it. The belief that Bishop Berkeley was the author of _Gaudentio di
+Lucca_ may therefore be considered as unauthorised.
+
+The copy of the edition of _Gaudentio_ of 1786, which is preserved in
+the British Museum, contains in the title-page the following note, in
+pencil:
+
+ "Written originally in English by Dr. Swale of Huntingdon. See
+ _Gent. Mag._ 1786."
+
+The _Gentleman's Magazine_ for 1786 does not, however, contain any
+information about the authorship of _Gaudentio_; and the name of Dr.
+Swale appears to be unknown in literary history. At the same time, a
+positive entry of this sort, with respect to an obscure person,
+doubtless had some foundation. On the authority of this note, Dr. Swale
+is registered as the author of Gaudentio in the printed catalogue of the
+British Museum Library, whence it has passed into Watt's _Bibl. Brit._
+Perhaps some of your correspondents, who are connected with Huntingdon,
+may be able to throw some light on Dr. Swale.
+
+Lastly, it should be added, that the writer of the article "Berkeley,"
+in the _Biographic Universelle_, adverts to the fact that _Gaudentio di
+Lucca_ has been attributed to him: he proceeds, however, to say that--
+
+ "The author of a Life of Berkeley affirms that Berkeley is not
+ the author of that book, which he supposes to have been written
+ by a Catholic priest imprisoned in the Tower of London."
+
+I have been unable to trace the origin of this statement; nor do I know
+what is the _Life of Berkeley_, to which the writer in the _Biogr.
+Univ._ refers. The Life published under the direction of his family
+makes no allusion to Gaudentio, or to the belief that it was composed by
+Bishop Berkeley.
+
+The _Encyclopédie Méthodique_, div. "Econ. pol. et dipl." (Paris, 1784),
+tom. I. p. 89., mentions the following work:--
+
+ "La République des Philosophes, ou l'Histoire des Ajaoiens,
+ relation d'un voyage du Chevalier S. van Doelvett en Orient en
+ l'an 1674, qui contient la description du Gouvernement, de la
+ Religion, et des Moeurs des Ajaoiens."
+
+It is stated that this romance, though composed a century before, had
+only been lately published. The editor attributed it to Fontenelle, but
+(as the writer in the _Encycl. Méth._ thinks) probably without reason.
+The title of Berkeley to the authorship of Gaudentio has doubtless no
+better foundation.
+
+L.
+
+
+[Dunlop, _Hist. Fiction_, iii. 491., speaks of this romance as
+"generally, and I believe on good grounds, supposed to be the work of
+the celebrated Berkeley;" adding, "we are told, in the life of this
+celebrated man, that Plato was his favourite author: and, indeed, of all
+English writers Berkeley has most successfully imitated the style and
+manner of that philosopher. It is not impossible, therefore, that the
+fanciful republic of the Grecian sage may have led Berkeley to write
+_Gaudentio di Lucca_, of which the principal object apparently is to
+describe a faultless and patriarchal form of governnent." The subject is
+a very curious one, and invites the further inquiry of our valued
+correspondent.--ED.]
+
+ * * * * *
+
+ON A PASSAGE IN "THE TEMPEST."
+
+I was indebted to MR. SINGER for one of the best emendations in the
+edition of Shakspeare I superintended (vol. vi. p. 559.), and I have too
+much respect for his sagacity and learning to pass, without observation,
+his remarks in "NOTES AND QUERIES" (Vol. ii., p. 259.), on the
+conclusion of the speech of Ferdinand, in "The Tempest," Act iii., Sc.
+1.:--
+
+ "But these sweet thoughts do even refresh my labours;
+ Most busy, least when I do it."
+
+This is the way in which I ventured to print the passage, depending
+mainly upon the old copies. In the folio, 1623, where the play for the
+first time appeared, the last line stands:
+
+ "Most busie lest, when I doe it;"
+
+and in that of 1632,
+
+ "Most busie least, when I doe it:" {300}
+
+so that the whole merit I claim that of altering the place of a comma,
+thereby, as I apprehend, rendering the meaning of the poet evident. The
+principle upon which I proceeded throughout was that of making as little
+variation as possible from the ancient authorities: upon that principle
+I acted in the instance in question, and I frequently found that this
+was the surest mode of removing difficulties. I could not easily adduce
+a stronger proof of this position, than the six words on which the doubt
+at this time has been raised.
+
+Theobald made an important change in the old text, and his reading has
+been that generally adopted:--
+
+ "Most busy-less when I do it."
+
+In restoring the old text I had, therefore, to contend with
+prepossession, against which, it seems, the Rev. Mr. Dyce was not proof,
+although I only know it from MR. SINGER'S letter, never having looked
+into the book in which I suppose, the opinion is advanced.
+
+One reason why I should reject the substitution of "busy-less," even if
+I had not a better mode of overcoming the difficulty, is properly
+adverted to by MR. SINGER, viz. that the word was not in use in the time
+of Shakspeare. The only authority for it, at any period, quoted in
+Todd's Johnson, is this very (as I contend) corrupted passage in the
+Tempest; I have not met with it at all in any of the older dictionaries
+I have been able to consult; and unless the Rev. Mr. Dyce have been more
+fortunate, he was a little short-sighted, as well as a little angry,
+when he wrote his note upon mine. Had he taken more time to reflect, he
+might have found that after all Theobald and I are not so much at odds,
+although he arrives at his end by varying from, and I at mine by
+adhering to, the ancient authorities. In fact, I gain some confirmation
+of what, I believe, is the true meaning of Shakspeare, out of the very
+corruption Theobald introduced, and the Rev. Mr. Dyce, to my surprise,
+supports. I should have expected him to be the very last man who would
+advocate an abandonment of what has been handed down to us in every old
+edition of the play.
+
+The key of the whole speech of Ferdinand is contained in its very
+outset:--
+
+ "There be some sports are painful, and their labour
+ Delight in them sets off;"
+
+and the poet has said nearly the same thing in "Macbeth:"
+
+ "The labour we delight in physics pain."
+
+It is because Ferdinand delights in the labour that he does not feel it
+irksome:
+
+ "This my mean task
+ Would be as heavy to me as odious; but
+ The mistress which I serve quickens what's dead,
+ And makes my labours pleasure."
+
+He, therefore, tells us, at the close, that his labours are refreshed by
+the sweet thoughts of her; that, in fact, his toil is no toil, and that
+when he is "most busy" he "least does it," and suffers least under it.
+The delight he takes in his "mean task" renders it none.
+
+Such I take to be the clear meaning of the poet, though somewhat
+obscurely and paradoxically expressed--
+
+ "Most busy, least when I do it;"
+
+and when Theobald proposed to substitute
+
+ "Most busy-less when I do it,"
+
+he saw, though perhaps not quite distinctly, that such was the poet's
+intention, only, as I have said above, he arrived at it by altering, and
+I by adhering to, the poet's language. I may be allowed to add that I
+came to my conclusion many years before I was asked to put my name to an
+edition of Shakspeare, which interrupted one of the most valuable
+friendships I ever formed.
+
+MR. SINGER will see at once that my interpretation (which I consider
+quite consistent with the character of Shakspeare's mind, as well as
+quite consistent with the expressions he has used throughout the speech
+of the hero), steers clear of his proposal to alter "busie lest," or
+"busie least," of the folios of 1623 and 1632, to _busyest_ or
+_busiest_; although everybody at all acquainted with our old language
+will agree with him in thinking, that if Shakspeare had used "busiest"
+at all, which he does not in any of his productions, he might have said
+_most busiest_ without a violation of the constant practice of his day.
+
+J. PAYNE COLLIER.
+
+September 24. 1850.
+
+ * * * * *
+
+GRAY'S ELEGY.
+
+Perhaps the HERMIT of HOLYPORT will be satisfied with proofs from GRAY
+himself as to the time and manner of the first appearance of the
+_Elegy_.
+
+GRAY thus writes to Dr. Wharton, under the date of "Dec. 17, 1750." [I
+quote Mason's "Life" of its Author, p. 216.]
+
+ "The stanzas" [which he afterwards called _Elegy_ at the
+ suggestion of Mason] "which I now enclose to you have had the
+ misfortune, by _Mr._ [Horace] _Walpole's fault_, to be made
+ still more public," &c.
+
+The next letter in Mason's publication is a letter from "Mr. Gray to Mr.
+Walpole" (p. 217.), and is dated "_Cambridge, Feb._ 11, 1751," which
+runs thus:--
+
+ "As you have brought me into a little sort of distress, you must
+ assist me, I believe, to get out of it as well as I can.
+ Yesterday I had the misfortune of receiving a letter from
+ certain gentlemen (as their bookseller expresses it) who have
+ taken the Magazine of Magazines into their hands: they tell me
+ that an {301} _ingenious_ poem, called 'Reflections in a Country
+ Church-yard,' has been communicated to them, which they are
+ printing forthwith; that they are informed that the _excellent_
+ author of it is I by name, and that they beg not only his
+ _indulgence_, but the _honour_ of his correspondence, &c.... I
+ therefore am obliged to desire you would make Dodsley print it
+ immediately _from your copy_, but without my name, &c. He must
+ correct the press himself ... and the title must be 'Elegy
+ written in a Country Church-yard.' If he would add a line or two
+ to say it came into his hand by accident, I should like it
+ better ... If Dodsley do not do this immediately, he may as well
+ let it alone."
+
+Dr. Johnson (_Life of Gray_) says:
+
+ "His next production, 1750, was his far-famed _Elegy_," &c.
+
+The Doctor adds:
+
+ "Several of his [Gray's] pieces were published, 1753, with
+ designs by Mr. Bentley, and that they might in some form or
+ other make a book, only one side of each leaf was printed. I
+ believe the poems and the plates recommended each other so well,
+ that the whole impression was soon bought."
+
+It contains _six_ poems, one being the _Elegy_. I have before me a copy
+of this collection, which is folio. The plates are clever, and very
+curious; a copy was sold at the Fonthill sale for 3l. 4s.! The copy,
+admirably bound, which I quote, was bought at a bookseller's
+front-window stall for 4s. The title of this collection is "_Designs by
+Mr._ R. BENTLEY, _for six poems by Mr._ J. GRAY."
+
+According to the title-page, it was "printed for R. DODSLEY, in Pall
+Mall, MDCCLIII.," two years previously to the date to which your
+correspondent refers. This (1753) collection gives the line,--
+
+ "Save where the beetle wheels his _droning_ flight."
+
+In the _Elegant Extracts_ (verse), ed. 1805, which, it must be needless
+to mention, was prepared by the able and indefatigable Dr. Vicesimus
+Knox, the accomplished scholar gives the line--
+
+ "Save where the beetle wheels his _drony_ flight."
+
+Dr. Johnson's _Dictionary_ does not insert the word "droning" or
+"drony;" but among his Illustrations attached to the verb "to drone,"
+there are two from Dryden, each, it may be seen, using the word
+"droning." There is no quotation containing the word "drony." Gray's
+language is:
+
+ "Save where the beetle wheels his _droning_ flight,
+ And drowsy _tinklings_ lull the distant folds."
+
+Johnson's second quotation from Dryden may be worth repeating, as
+showing that Gray's language is not wholly different from his
+predecessor's:--
+
+ "Melfoil and honeysuckles pound,
+ With these alluring savours strew the ground,
+ And mix with _tinkling_ brass the cymbal's _droning_ sound."
+
+It is perhaps hardly worth noticing, that there is not uniformity even
+in the title. Johnson calls it, _Elegy in the Church-yard_; Dodsley
+(1753) styles it, _Elegy written in a Country Church-yard_.
+
+A HERMIT AT HAMPSTEAD.
+
+
+_Gray's Elegy_ (Vol. ii., p. 264.).--The HERMIT OF HOLYPORT is referred
+to the 4to. edit. of the _Works of Gray_, by Thos. Jas. Mathias, in
+which, vol. i. at the end of the Elegy, in print, he will find "From the
+original in the handwriting of Thos. Gray:
+
+ "'Save where the beetle wheels his _droning_ flight.'"
+
+From the autograph the Elegy appears to have been written in 1750; and
+the margin states, published in Feb. 1751, by Dodsley, and went through
+four editions in two months; and afterwards a fifth, sixth, seventh and
+eighth, ninth and tenth, and eleventh; printed also in 1753, with Mr.
+Bentley's designs, of which there is a second edition; and again by
+Dodsley in his _Miscellany_, vol. iv.; and in a Scotch collection,
+called the _Union_. Translated into Latin by Chr. Anstey, Esq., and the
+Rev. Mr. Roberts, and published in 1762; and again in the same year by
+Rob. Lloyd, M.A. The original MS. of the above will be found among the
+MSS. of Thos. Gray, in the possession of the Masters and Fellows of
+Pembroke House, Cambridge.
+
+W.S.
+
+Richmond, Sept 21. 1850
+
+ * * * * *
+
+BISHOPS AND THEIR PRECEDENCE.
+(Vol. ii., p. 254.)
+
+Arun is not right, in reference to this Query, in saying that the
+precedence of bishops over the temporal barons is regulated by the
+statute of 31 Hen. VIII. The precedence of bishops over the temporal
+lords is not regulated by the Act of 31 Hen. VIII. for placing the
+lords. They may have originally been summoned to sit in parliament in
+right of their succession to certain baronial lands annexed to, or
+supposed to be annexed to their episcopal sees; but as some of the
+temporal peers were also summoned in right of lands held of the king
+_per baroniam_, that is not a satisfactory reason why they should take
+precedence of temporal barons.
+
+The precedency must have been regulated by some other laws, rules, or
+usage than are presented by the Act of 31 Hen. VIII. The Archbishop of
+Canterbury precedes the Lord Chancellor; the Archbishop of York the Lord
+President of the Council and the Lord Privy Seal; and all bishops
+precede barons. This precedency, however, is not given by the _statute_.
+The Act provides only, in reference to the spiritual peers, that the
+Vicegerent for good and due ministration of justice, to be had in all
+causes and cases touching the ecclesiastical jurisdiction, and for the
+godly reformation and redress of all errors, heresies, and abuses in the
+{302} Church (and all other persons having grant of the said office),
+shall sit and be placed in all parliaments on the _right side_ of the
+parliament chamber, and upon the same form that the Archbishop of
+Canterbury sitteth on, and above the same archbishop and his successors;
+and next to the said Vicegerent shall sit the Archbishop of Canterbury;
+and then, next to him, on the same form and side, shall sit the
+Archbishop of York; and next to him, on the same form and side, the
+Bishop of London; and next to him, on the same side and form, the Bishop
+of Durham; and next to him, on the same side and form, the Bishop of
+Winchester; and then all the other bishops of both provinces of
+Canterbury and York shall sit and be placed on the same side, after
+their ancienties, as it hath been accustomed.
+
+There is nothing here to show in what order they are to rank among the
+great officers, or other temporal peers; nor is the precedency given to
+the Lord Chancellor over the Archbishop of York.
+
+By the Act of Union of Great Britain and Ireland, the archbishops of
+that kingdom have rank immediately after the Archbishop of York, and
+therefore before the great officers (excepting only the Lord
+Chancellor), as well as above dukes; and the Irish bishops immediately
+after those of England.
+
+It may be rightly stated that the high spiritual rank of the bishops is
+a reason for giving them precedence over the temporal lords sitting as
+barons; but has that _reason_ been assigned by any writer of authority,
+or even any writer upon precedence?--the Query suggested by E. (Vol.
+ii., p. 9.) Lord Coke does not assign that reason, but says, because
+they hold their bishopricks of the king _per baroniam_. But the holding
+_per baroniam_, as before observed, would equally apply to the temporal
+lords holding lands by similar tenures, and sitting by writ, and
+receiving summons in ancient times in virtue of such their tenure.
+
+The precedence of bishops over barons was clearly _disputed_ in the
+reign of King Henry VI., when Baker says in his _Chronicle_ (p. 204.),
+_judgment_ was given for the _lords temporal_; but where the judgment,
+or any account of the dispute for precedence, is to be found I cannot
+say. That is what your correspondent G. inquired for (Vol. ii., p. 76.).
+
+C.G.
+
+
+Your correspondent ARUN (Vol. ii., p. 254.) states, on the authority of
+Stephen's _Blackstone_, that--
+
+ "Bishops are temporal barons, and sit in the House of Peers in
+ right of succession to certain ancient baronies annexed or
+ supposed to be annexed to their episcopal lands."
+
+This position, though supported by Lord Coke in more places than one
+(see _Coke upon Littleton_, 134. _a, b_; 3 _Inst._ 30.; 4 _Inst._ 44.),
+and adopted by most other legal text-writers on his authority, cannot,
+it is conceived, be supported. It seems to be clearly ascertained that
+bishops sat in the great councils of this and other kingdoms not
+_ratione baroniarum_ but _jure ecclesiarum_, by custom, long before the
+tenure _per baroniam_ was known. In the preambles to the laws of Ina
+(Wilkins' _Leges Ang.-Sax._ f. 14.), of Athelstan (_ib._ 54.), of Edmund
+(_ib._ 72.), the bishops are mentioned along with others of the great
+council, whilst the tenure _per baroniam_ was not known until after the
+Conquest. The truth seems to be that
+
+ "The bishops of the Conqueror's age were entitled to sit in his
+ councils by the general custom of Europe and by the common law
+ of England, which the conquest did not overturn."--Hallam's
+ _Mid. Ag._ 137-8, 9th ed.
+
+Can any of your readers throw any light on the much disputed tenure _per
+baroniam_? What was its essential character, what its incidents, and in
+what way did it differ from the ordinary tenure _in capite_?
+
+BARO.
+
+ * * * * *
+
+REPLIES TO MINOR QUERIES.
+
+_Leicester and the reputed Poisoners of his Time_ (Vol. ii., pp. 9.
+92.).--This subject receives interesting illustration in the _Memoirs of
+Gervas Holles_, who at some length describes the seduction of the Lady
+Sheffield, by Leicester, at Belvoir Castle, while attending the Queen on
+her Progress. A letter from the Earl to the lady of his love, contained
+the suspicious intimation--
+
+ "_That he had not been unmindful in removing that obstacle_
+ which hindered the full fruition of their contentments; that he
+ had endeavoured one expedient already which had failed, but he
+ would lay another which he doubted not would hit more sure."
+
+This letter the Lady Sheffield accidentally dropped from her pocket; and
+being picked up and given to the Lord Sheffield by his sister Holles, he
+read it with anger and amazement. That night he parted beds, and the
+next day houses; meditating in what manner he might take honourable and
+just revenge. Having resolved, he posted up to London to effect it; but
+the discovery had preceded him to the knowledge of Leicester, who
+finding a necessity to be quick, bribed an Italian physician ("whose
+name," says Holles, "I have forgotten") in whom Lord Sheffield had great
+confidence, to poison him, which was immediately effected after his
+arrival in London. Leicester, after cohabiting with the Lady Sheffield
+for some time, married the widow of the Earl of Essex, who, it is
+thought, says Holles, "_served him in his own kind, every way_."
+
+In the suit afterwards instituted by Sir Robert Dudley, with the view of
+establishing his legitimacy, the Lady Sheffield was examined, and swore
+{303} to a private marriage with the Earl of Leicester, but that she had
+been prevailed on, by threats and pecuniary largesses, to deny the
+marriage, as Queen Elizabeth was desirous that Lord Leicester should
+marry the widow of the Earl of Essex.
+
+One curious circumstance arises out of the revival of these dark doings.
+Are the particular drugs employed by Leicester's Italian physician "in
+removing obstacles" now known and in operation? By a remarkable
+coincidence, in a case of supposed poisoning at Cheltenham, some time
+since, the intended victim escaped with the loss of his hair and his
+nails.
+
+H.K.S.C.
+
+
+_What is the correct Prefix of Mayors?_ (Vol. i., p. 380.)--In Leicester
+the usage has always been to designate the chief magistrate "The
+worshipful the Mayor," which, I believe, is the style used in
+_boroughs_. In _cities_, and places _specially privileged_, "Right
+worshipful" are the terms employed.
+
+JAYTEE.
+
+
+_Marks of Cadency_ (Vol. ii., p. 248.).--The label of the Prince of
+Wales has, from the time of Edward III. up to the present time, been of
+three points argent, and _not_ charged.
+
+F.E.
+
+ * * * * *
+
+
+MISCELLANEOUS.
+
+NOTES ON BOOKS, SALES, CATALOGUES, ETC.
+
+Although we do not usually record in our columns the losses which
+literature sustains from time to time, we cannot permit the death of
+Thomas Amyot, the learned Director of the Camden Society, and for so
+many years the Treasurer of the Society of Antiquaries, to pass without
+rendering our grateful tribute to the memory of one of the most
+intelligent and kindest-hearted men that ever breathed; from whom we, in
+common with so many others, when entering on our literary career,
+received the most friendly assistance, and the most encouraging
+sympathy.
+
+Every fifty years commences a discussion of the great question when the
+current century, or half century, properly begins. We have just seen
+this in the numerous Queries, Answers, Replies, and Rejoinders upon the
+subject which have appeared in the columns of the daily and weekly
+press; the only regular treatise being the essay upon _Ancient and
+Modern Usage in Reckoning_, by professor De Morgan, in the _Companion to
+the Almanack_ for the present year. This Essay is opposed to the idea of
+a "zero year," and one of the advocates of that system of computation
+has, therefore, undertaken a defence of the zero principle, which he
+pronounces, "when properly understood, is undoubtedly the most correct
+basis of reckoning," in a small volume entitled, _An Examination of the
+Century Question_, and in which he maintains the point for which he is
+contending with considerable learning and ingenuity. All who are
+interested in the question at issue, will be at once amused and
+instructed by it.
+
+Mr. Charles Knight announces a new edition of his _Pictorial
+Shakespeare_ under the title of the National Edition; to contain the
+whole of the Notes, Illustrations, &c., thoroughly revised; and which,
+while it will be printed in a clear and beautiful type across the page,
+and not in double columns, will have the advantage of being much cheaper
+than the edition which he originally put forth.
+
+_The Declaration of the Fathers of the Councell of Trent concerning the
+going into Churches at such Times as Hereticall Service is said or
+Heresy preached, &c._, is a reprint of a very rare tract, which
+possesses some present interest, as it bears upon the statement which
+has been of late years much insisted on by Mr. Perceval and other
+Anglican controversialists, that for the first twelve years of
+Elizabeth's reign, and until Pius V.'s celebrated Bull, _Regnans in
+Excelsis_, the Roman Catholics of England were in the habit of
+frequenting the Reformed worship.
+
+We have received the following Catalogues:--W.S. Lincoln's (Cheltenham
+House, Westminster Road) Sixty-first Catalogue of English and Foreign
+Second-hand Books; W.D. Reeve's (98. Chancery Lane) Catalogue No. 13. of
+Cheap Books, many Rare and Curious; R. Kimpton's (31. Wardour Street,
+Soho) Catalogue No. 29. of Second-hand Books in good Condition at very
+reduced Prices.
+
+ * * * * *
+
+BOOKS AND ODD VOLUMES
+
+WANTED TO PURCHASE.
+
+CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY POLL-BOOKS FOR 1780, 1784, 1790, and
+ 1829.
+
+OXFORD UNIVERSITY POLL-BOOKS for 1750, 1768, 1806.
+
+BEN JONSON by CLIFFORD. 8vo. Vols. II., III., and IV.
+
+Letters, stating particulars and lowest price, _carriage free_, to be
+sent to Mr. BELL, Publisher of "NOTES AND QUERIES," 186. Fleet Street.
+
+ * * * * *
+
+NOTICES TO CORRESPONDENTS.
+
+VOLUME THE FIRST OF NOTES AND QUERIES, _with Title-page and very copious
+Index, is now ready, price 9s. 6d., bound in cloth, and may be had, by
+order, of all Booksellers and Newsmen._
+
+_We are unavoidably compelled to postpone numerous NOTES, QUERIES, AND
+REPLIES: indeed we see no way of clearing off our accumulation of
+REPLIES without the publication of an extra Number, to be devoted
+exclusively to the numerous Answers which we now have waiting for
+insertion._
+
+GUTCH'S Literary and Scientific Regsiter and Almanack, _advertised in
+our last No., is for_ 1851 _not_ 1850.
+
+Mr. G.B. RICHARDSON _would oblige us by forwarding the additional verses
+of_ "Long Lonkin" _for our correspondent_ SELEUCUS.
+
+A CONSTANT SUBSCRIBER _will find the line_,
+
+ "Music hath charms to soothe the savage breast,"
+
+_in Congreve's_ Mourning Bride.
+
+JANUS DOUSA. _In our next No._
+
+MEDICUS, _who inquires respecting the origin of the proverbial saying,
+"Quem Deus vult perdere," is referred to our First Volume_, pp. 347.
+351. 421. and 476. _The original line reads "Quem Jupiter vult," and is
+Barnes' translation of a fragment of_ Euripides. {304}
+
+ * * * * *
+
+THE QUARTERLY REVIEW,
+No. CLXXIV., is published THIS DAY.
+
+CONTENTS:
+ I. TICKNOR'S HISTORY OF SPANISH LITERATURE.
+ II. CHURCH AND EDUCATION IN WALES.
+ III. FORMS OF SALUTATION.
+ IV. SIBERIA AND CALIFORNIA.
+ V. MURE ON THE LITERATURE OF GREECE.
+ VI. METROPOLITAN WATER SUPPLY.
+ VII. ANECDOTES OF THE PROVISIONAL GOVERNMENT.
+VIII. COCHRANES'S YOUNG ITALY.
+ IX. LAST DAY OF LOUIS-PHILIPPE.
+
+JOHN MURRAY, Albemarle Street.
+
+ * * * * *
+
+Will be published on the 1st of November, 1850, with the other
+Almanacks,
+
+THE LITERARY AND SCIENTIFIC REGISTER AND ALMANACK for 1851. Price 3s.
+6d.
+
+Dedicated by especial permission to H.R.H. Prince Albert, by J.W.G.
+GUTCH, M.R.C.S.L., F.L.S.;
+
+Containing a condensed mass of scientific and useful information alike
+valuable to the student and man of science.
+
+Tenth Yearly issue.
+
+Published by D. BOGUE, Fleet Street, London
+
+ * * * * *
+
+Shortly will be Published.
+
+THE ARCHITECTURAL QUARTERLY REVIEW. A Literary Periodical devoted to
+Works appertaining to the Art and Science of Architecture. Prospectuses
+may be obtained from the Publisher. Letters for the Editor, and books,
+drawings, models, and specimens, to be addressed to the care of the
+Publisher.
+
+GEORGE BELL, 186. Fleet Street.
+
+ * * * * *
+
+Royal 4to., cloth, price 2l. 2s.
+
+EXAMPLES OF ANCIENT PULPITS EXISTING IN ENGLAND. Selected and drawn from
+Sketches and Measurements taken on the Spot, with Descriptive
+Letterpress. By FRANCIS T. DOLLMAN, Architect.
+
+This Work contains thirty quarto Plates, three of which are highly
+finished in Colours, restored accurately from the existing indications.
+The Pulpits delineated are St. Westburga, Chester: SS. Peter and Paul,
+Shrewsbury; St. Michael, Coventry; St. Mary, Wendon; St. Mary and All
+Saints, Fotheringay; All Saints, North Cerney; Holy Trinity, Nallsea;
+St. Peter Winchcombe; St. John Baptist, Cirencester; St. Mary, Totness;
+St. Mary, Frampton. Holy Trinity, Old Aston; St. Benedict, Glastonbury;
+St. Peter, Wolverhampton: St. Andrew, Cheddar (coloured); St. Andrew,
+Banwell; St. George, Brakworth; Holy Trinity, Long Sutton (coloured);
+St. Saviour, Dartmouth (coloured); All Saints, Sudbury; All Saints,
+Hawstead; St. Mary de Lode, Gloucester; St. Mary, North Petherton.
+
+GEORGE BELL, 186. Fleet Street.
+
+ * * * * *
+
+To be completed in Four Parts, Parts I. and II., price 5s. each plain;
+7s. 6d. coloured.
+
+ANTIQUARIAN GLEANINGS IN THE NORTH OF ENGLAND: being Examples of Antique
+Furniture, Plate, Church Decoration, Objects of Historical Interest, &c.
+Drawn and etched by W.B. SCOTT.
+
+"A collection of antiquarian relics, chiefly in the decorative branch of
+art, preserved in the northern counties, portrayed by a very competent
+hand ... All are drawn with that distinctness which makes them available
+for the antiquarian, for the artist who is studying costume, and for the
+study of decorative art."--_Spectator._
+
+Parts III. and IV., completing the Work, are in preparation, and will be
+published shortly.
+
+GEORGE BELL, 186. Fleet Street.
+
+ * * * * *
+
+THE EDINBURGH REVIEW,
+No CLXXXVIII., will be publishd on THURSDAY,
+October 10th, 1850.
+
+ I. HISTORY OF THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE.
+ II. THE UNITED STATES.
+ III. BRITISH MUSEUM: CATALOGUE OF PRINTED BOOKS.
+ IV. MURE'S CRITICAL HISTORY OF THE LANGUAGE
+ AND LITERATURE OF ANTIENT GREECE.
+ V. COL. CHESNEY'S EXPEDITION TO THE EUPHRATES AND TIGRIS.
+ VI. RECENT CLASSICAL ROMANCES.
+VIII. DIFFICULTIES OF REPLUBLICAN FRANCE.
+ IX. HORACE AND TASSO.
+
+London: LONGMAN AND CO. Edinburgh: A. and C. BLACK.
+
+ * * * * *
+
+MR. L.A. LEWIS'S SALES for OCTOBER, 1850, FRIDAY 11TH., and SATURDAY
+12th. Valuable Books, Architechural Books, Books of Prints, &c., from
+the West of England, including Stuart and Revett's Antiquities of
+Athens, 4 vols.; unedited Antiuities of Attica; Piranesi Campus Martius
+Antiqua Orbis; Houghton Gallery, 2 vols; Bowyer's Hume's England;
+Rogers' Collection of Prints, 2 vols.; Knorr, Deliciæ Naturæ Selectæ, 2
+vols.; Tableaux Historiques de la Révolution Française, 2 vols.; Stow's
+London, by Strype, 2 vols.; Domesday Book, 2 vols.; Edmondson's
+Heraldry, 2 vols.; Illustrated London News, 11 vols.; Encyclopædia
+Metropolitana, 29 vols.; Neale's Gentlemen's Seats, 6 vols.; Loddiges'
+Botanical Cabinet, 10 vols., large paper; Maund's Botanic Garden, 9
+vols.; Sweet's Geraniums, 5 vols.; Beauties of England and Wales, 32
+vols.; Hogarth's Works, 3 vols., red morocco; Knight's London, 6 vols.;
+Retrospective Review, 14 vols.; Bayle, Dictionnaire Historique, 16
+vols.; Lodge's Illustrious Portraits, 10 vols.; Knight's Pictorial
+Bible, 3 vols.; Clarke's Commentary on the Bible, 6 vols.; a few
+Pictures and Prints, &c.
+
+FRIDAY, 18TH, AND SATURDAY, 19TH.--Books, including the stock of the
+late Mr. C. Whiten.
+
+FRIDAY, 25TH,--Pictures, Prints, Books, Stereotype Plates, Copyrights,
+Books in Quires, &c.
+
+Mr. C.A. Lewis will have Sales on each Friday in November and December.
+
+125. Fleet Street.
+
+ * * * * *
+
+Just published, Part 9, price 9s., plain; Tinted, small paper, 10s. 6d.;
+Proof, large paper, 12s.
+
+THE CHURCHES OF THE MIDDLE AGES: or, Select Specimens of Early and
+Middle Pointed Structures; with a few of the pures; Late Pointed
+Examples, Illustrated by Geometric and Perspective Drawings. By HENRY
+BOWMAN and J.S. CROWTHER, Architects. Containing Illustrations of St.
+Peter's Church, Thrukingham, Norfolk; St. John's, Cley, Norfolk; and St.
+Andrew's, Heckington, Lincolnshire.
+
+To be completed in Twenty Parts, each containing Six Plates, Imperial
+folio. Issued at intervals of two months.
+
+"Ewerby is a magnficent specimen of a Flowing Middle-Pointed Church. it
+is most perfectly measured and described: one can follow the most
+rcondite beauties of the construction, mouldings and joints, in these
+Plates, almost as well as in the original structure. Such a monograph as
+this will be of incalculable value to the architects of our Colonies or
+the United States, who have no means of access to ancient churches. The
+Plates are on stone, done with remarkable skill and distinctness. Of
+Heckington we can only say that the perspective view from the south-east
+presents a very vision of beauty; we can hardle conceive anything more
+perfect. We heartlily recommend this series to all who are able to
+patronize it."--_Ecclesiologist_, Oct. 1849.
+
+"This, if completed in a similar manner to the Parts now out, will be a
+beautiful and valuable work. The perspective of St. Andrew's,
+Heckington, is a charming specimen of lithography, by Hawkins. We
+unhesitatingly recommend Messrs. Bowman and Crowther's work to our
+readers, as likely to be useful to them."--_Builder_.
+
+London: GEORGE BELL, 186. Fleet Street.
+
+ * * * * *
+
+Printed by THOMAS CLARK SHAW, of No. 8. New Street Square, at No. 5. New
+Street Square, in the Parish of St. Bride in the City of London; and
+published by GEORGE BELL, of No. 186. Fleet Street, in the Parish of St.
+Dunstan in the West, in the City of London, Publisher, at No. 186. Fleet
+Street aforesaid.--Saturday, October 5. 1850.
+
+
+
+
+
+End of the Project Gutenberg EBook of Notes and Queries, Number 49,
+Saturday, Oct. 5, 1850, by Various
+
+*** END OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK NOTES AND QUERIES ***
+
+***** This file should be named 13480-8.txt or 13480-8.zip *****
+This and all associated files of various formats will be found in:
+ https://www.gutenberg.org/1/3/4/8/13480/
+
+Produced by The Internet Library of Early Journals, Jon Ingram, David
+King, and the Online Distributed Proofreading Team.
+
+
+Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions
+will be renamed.
+
+Creating the works from public domain print editions means that no
+one owns a United States copyright in these works, so the Foundation
+(and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United States without
+permission and without paying copyright royalties. Special rules,
+set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license, apply to
+copying and distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works to
+protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm concept and trademark. Project
+Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if you
+charge for the eBooks, unless you receive specific permission. If you
+do not charge anything for copies of this eBook, complying with the
+rules is very easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose
+such as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and
+research. They may be modified and printed and given away--you may do
+practically ANYTHING with public domain eBooks. Redistribution is
+subject to the trademark license, especially commercial
+redistribution.
+
+
+
+*** START: FULL LICENSE ***
+
+THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE
+PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK
+
+To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free
+distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work
+(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project
+Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full Project
+Gutenberg-tm License (available with this file or online at
+https://gutenberg.org/license).
+
+
+Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic works
+
+1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to
+and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property
+(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all
+the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or destroy
+all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your possession.
+If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the
+terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or
+entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8.
+
+1.B. "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark. It may only be
+used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who
+agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few
+things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works
+even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See
+paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement
+and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
+works. See paragraph 1.E below.
+
+1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the Foundation"
+or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection of Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic works. Nearly all the individual works in the
+collection are in the public domain in the United States. If an
+individual work is in the public domain in the United States and you are
+located in the United States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from
+copying, distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative
+works based on the work as long as all references to Project Gutenberg
+are removed. Of course, we hope that you will support the Project
+Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting free access to electronic works by
+freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm works in compliance with the terms of
+this agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with
+the work. You can easily comply with the terms of this agreement by
+keeping this work in the same format with its attached full Project
+Gutenberg-tm License when you share it without charge with others.
+
+1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern
+what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are in
+a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States, check
+the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this agreement
+before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, distributing or
+creating derivative works based on this work or any other Project
+Gutenberg-tm work. The Foundation makes no representations concerning
+the copyright status of any work in any country outside the United
+States.
+
+1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg:
+
+1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate
+access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear prominently
+whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work on which the
+phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the phrase "Project
+Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed, viewed,
+copied or distributed:
+
+This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with
+almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or
+re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included
+with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org
+
+1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is derived
+from the public domain (does not contain a notice indicating that it is
+posted with permission of the copyright holder), the work can be copied
+and distributed to anyone in the United States without paying any fees
+or charges. If you are redistributing or providing access to a work
+with the phrase "Project Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the
+work, you must comply either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1
+through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the
+Project Gutenberg-tm trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or
+1.E.9.
+
+1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted
+with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution
+must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any additional
+terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms will be linked
+to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works posted with the
+permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of this work.
+
+1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this
+work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm.
+
+1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this
+electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without
+prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with
+active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project
+Gutenberg-tm License.
+
+1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary,
+compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including any
+word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access to or
+distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format other than
+"Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official version
+posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm web site (www.gutenberg.org),
+you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a
+copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon
+request, of the work in its original "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other
+form. Any alternate format must include the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1.
+
+1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying,
+performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works
+unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.
+
+1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing
+access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works provided
+that
+
+- You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from
+ the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method
+ you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is
+ owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he
+ has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the
+ Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments
+ must be paid within 60 days following each date on which you
+ prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your periodic tax
+ returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked as such and
+ sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the
+ address specified in Section 4, "Information about donations to
+ the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation."
+
+- You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies
+ you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he
+ does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+ License. You must require such a user to return or
+ destroy all copies of the works possessed in a physical medium
+ and discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of
+ Project Gutenberg-tm works.
+
+- You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any
+ money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the
+ electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days
+ of receipt of the work.
+
+- You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
+ distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works.
+
+1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set
+forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from
+both the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and Michael
+Hart, the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark. Contact the
+Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below.
+
+1.F.
+
+1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable
+effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread
+public domain works in creating the Project Gutenberg-tm
+collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
+works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may contain
+"Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or
+corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual
+property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other medium, a
+computer virus, or computer codes that damage or cannot be read by
+your equipment.
+
+1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right
+of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project
+Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project
+Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all
+liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal
+fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT
+LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE
+PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH F3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE
+TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE
+LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR
+INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH
+DAMAGE.
+
+1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a
+defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can
+receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a
+written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you
+received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium with
+your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you with
+the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu of a
+refund. If you received the work electronically, the person or entity
+providing it to you may choose to give you a second opportunity to
+receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If the second copy
+is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing without further
+opportunities to fix the problem.
+
+1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth
+in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS', WITH NO OTHER
+WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO
+WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTIBILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.
+
+1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied
+warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages.
+If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the
+law of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be
+interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by
+the applicable state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any
+provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions.
+
+1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the
+trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone
+providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in accordance
+with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the production,
+promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works,
+harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees,
+that arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do
+or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg-tm
+work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or deletions to any
+Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any Defect you cause.
+
+
+Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of
+electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of computers
+including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It exists
+because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations from
+people in all walks of life.
+
+Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the
+assistance they need, is critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's
+goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will
+remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project
+Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure
+and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future generations.
+To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation
+and how your efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4
+and the Foundation web page at https://www.pglaf.org.
+
+
+Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
+Foundation
+
+The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non profit
+501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the
+state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal
+Revenue Service. The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification
+number is 64-6221541. Its 501(c)(3) letter is posted at
+https://pglaf.org/fundraising. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg
+Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent
+permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state's laws.
+
+The Foundation's principal office is located at 4557 Melan Dr. S.
+Fairbanks, AK, 99712., but its volunteers and employees are scattered
+throughout numerous locations. Its business office is located at
+809 North 1500 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887, email
+business@pglaf.org. Email contact links and up to date contact
+information can be found at the Foundation's web site and official
+page at https://pglaf.org
+
+For additional contact information:
+ Dr. Gregory B. Newby
+ Chief Executive and Director
+ gbnewby@pglaf.org
+
+Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg
+Literary Archive Foundation
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without wide
+spread public support and donations to carry out its mission of
+increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be
+freely distributed in machine readable form accessible by the widest
+array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations
+($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt
+status with the IRS.
+
+The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating
+charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United
+States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a
+considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up
+with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations
+where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To
+SEND DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any
+particular state visit https://pglaf.org
+
+While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we
+have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition
+against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who
+approach us with offers to donate.
+
+International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make
+any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from
+outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff.
+
+Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation
+methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other
+ways including including checks, online payments and credit card
+donations. To donate, please visit: https://pglaf.org/donate
+
+
+Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
+works.
+
+Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project Gutenberg-tm
+concept of a library of electronic works that could be freely shared
+with anyone. For thirty years, he produced and distributed Project
+Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer support.
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed
+editions, all of which are confirmed as Public Domain in the U.S.
+unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not necessarily
+keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper edition.
+
+Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search facility:
+
+ https://www.gutenberg.org
+
+This Web site includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm,
+including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary
+Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to
+subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks.
+
diff --git a/old/13480-8.zip b/old/13480-8.zip
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..353f86d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/old/13480-8.zip
Binary files differ
diff --git a/old/13480-h.zip b/old/13480-h.zip
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..6d906be
--- /dev/null
+++ b/old/13480-h.zip
Binary files differ
diff --git a/old/13480-h/13480-h.htm b/old/13480-h/13480-h.htm
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..1d85448
--- /dev/null
+++ b/old/13480-h/13480-h.htm
@@ -0,0 +1,2362 @@
+<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
+ "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
+<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
+<head>
+<meta name="generator" content=
+"HTML Tidy for Windows (vers 1st March 2004), see www.w3.org" />
+<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content=
+"text/html; charset=us-ascii" />
+<title>Notes And Queries, Issue 49.</title>
+
+<style type="text/css">
+
+ /*<![CDATA[*/
+ <!--
+ body {margin-left: 10%; margin-right: 10%;}
+ p {text-align: justify;}
+ blockquote {text-align: justify;}
+ h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6 {text-align: center;}
+ pre {font-size: 0.7em;}
+
+ hr {text-align: center; width: 50%;}
+ html>body hr {margin-right: 25%; margin-left: 25%; width: 50%;}
+ hr.full {width: 100%;}
+ html>body hr.full {margin-right: 0%; margin-left: 0%; width: 100%;}
+ hr.adverts {width: 100%; height: 5px; color: black;}
+ html>body hr.adverts {margin-right: 0%; margin-left: 0%; width: 100%;}
+ hr.short {text-align: center; width: 20%;}
+ html>body hr.short {margin-right: 40%; margin-left: 40%; width: 20%;}
+
+
+ .note, .footnote {margin-left: 10%; margin-right: 10%;
+ font-size: 0.9em;}
+
+ .poem {margin-left:10%; margin-right:10%;
+ text-align: left;}
+ .poem .stanza {margin: 1em 0em 1em 0em;}
+ .poem p {margin: 0; padding-left: 3em; text-indent: -3em;}
+ .poem p.i2 {margin-left: 2em;}
+ .poem p.i4 {margin-left: 4em;}
+ .poem p.i6 {margin-left: 6em;}
+ .poem p.i8 {margin-left: 8em;}
+ .poem p.i10 {margin-left: 10em;}
+ .poem .caesura {vertical-align: -200%;}
+
+ span.pagenum {position: absolute; left: 1%; right: 91%;
+ font-size: 8pt;}
+
+ p.author {text-align: right;}
+ -->
+ /*]]>*/
+</style>
+</head>
+<body>
+
+
+<pre>
+
+The Project Gutenberg EBook of Notes and Queries, Number 49, Saturday,
+Oct. 5, 1850, by Various
+
+This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with
+almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or
+re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included
+with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org
+
+
+Title: Notes and Queries, Number 49, Saturday, Oct. 5, 1850
+
+Author: Various
+
+Release Date: September 16, 2004 [EBook #13480]
+
+Language: English
+
+Character set encoding: ISO-8859-1
+
+*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK NOTES AND QUERIES ***
+
+
+
+
+Produced by The Internet Library of Early Journals, Jon Ingram, David
+King, and the Online Distributed Proofreading Team.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+</pre>
+
+<span class="pagenum"><a id="page289" name=
+"page289"></a>{289}</span>
+<h1>NOTES AND QUERIES:</h1>
+<h2>A MEDIUM OF INTER-COMMUNICATION FOR LITERARY MEN, ARTISTS,
+ANTIQUARIES, GENEALOGISTS, ETC.</h2>
+<hr />
+<h3><b>"When found, make a note of."</b>&mdash;CAPTAIN CUTTLE.</h3>
+<hr class="full" />
+<table summary="masthead" width="100%">
+<tr>
+<td align="left" width="25%"><b>No. 49.</b></td>
+<td align="center" width="50%"><b>SATURDAY, OCTOBER 5,
+1850</b></td>
+<td align="right" width="25%"><b>Price Threepence.<br />
+Stamped Edition 4d.</b></td>
+</tr>
+</table>
+<hr class="full" />
+<h2>CONTENTS.</h2>
+<table summary="Contents" align="center">
+<tr>
+<td align="left">NOTES:&mdash;</td>
+<td align="right">Page</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+<td align="left">Stray Notes on Cunningham's London</td>
+<td align="right"><a href="#page289">289</a></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+<td align="left">Satirical Song upon Villiers Duke of Buckingham,
+by Dr. Rimbault</td>
+<td align="right"><a href="#page291">291</a></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+<td align="left">Baker's Notes on Author of "Whole Duty of Man," by
+Rev. J.E.B. Mayor</td>
+<td align="right"><a href="#page292">292</a></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+<td align="left">Mistake about George Wither, by Dr. Rimbault</td>
+<td align="right"><a href="#page293">293</a></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+<td align="left">Useful <i>v.</i> Useless Learning</td>
+<td align="right"><a href="#page293">293</a></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+<td align="left">Minor Notes:&mdash;Numerals&mdash;Junius and Sir
+P. Francis&mdash;Jews under the Commonwealth&mdash;"Is any thing
+but," &amp;c.&mdash;Fastitocalon</td>
+<td align="right"><a href="#page294">294</a></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+<td align="left">QUERIES:&mdash;</td>
+<td></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+<td align="left">Bishop Cosin's Conference</td>
+<td align="right"><a href="#page295">295</a></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+<td align="left">Engleman's "Bibliotheca Scriptorum Classicorum,"
+by Professor De Morgan</td>
+<td align="right"><a href="#page296">296</a></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+<td align="left">Minor Queries:&mdash;Portrait of Sir P.
+Sidney&mdash;Confession&mdash;Scotch Prisoners at
+Worcester&mdash;Adamson's Edward II.&mdash;Sir Thomas
+Moore&mdash;Dr. E. Cleaver&mdash;Gwyan's
+London&mdash;Coronet&mdash;Cinderella&mdash;Judas' Bell&mdash;Dozen
+of Bread&mdash;Kings Skuggsia&mdash;Coins of
+Gandophares&mdash;Satirical Medals</td>
+<td align="right"><a href="#page296">296</a></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+<td align="left">REPLIES:&mdash;</td>
+<td></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+<td align="left">Gaudentio di Lucca</td>
+<td align="right"><a href="#page298">298</a></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+<td align="left">On a Passage in the Tempest, by J. Payne
+Collier</td>
+<td align="right"><a href="#page299">299</a></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+<td align="left">Gray's Elegy</td>
+<td align="right"><a href="#page300">300</a></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+<td align="left">Bishops and their Precedence</td>
+<td align="right"><a href="#page301">301</a></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+<td align="left">Replies to Minor Queries:&mdash;Leicester and the
+reputed Poisoners of his Time&mdash;What is the correct Prefix of
+Mayors&mdash;Marks of Cadency</td>
+<td align="right"><a href="#page302">302</a></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+<td align="left">MISCELLANEOUS:&mdash;</td>
+<td></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+<td align="left">Notes on Books, Sales, Catalogues, &amp;c.</td>
+<td align="right"><a href="#page303">303</a></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+<td align="left">Books and Odd Volumes Wanted</td>
+<td align="right"><a href="#page303">303</a></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+<td align="left">Notices to Correspondents</td>
+<td align="right"><a href="#page303">303</a></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+<td align="left">Advertisments</td>
+<td align="right"><a href="#page304">304</a></td>
+</tr>
+</table>
+<hr class="full" />
+<h2>NOTES.</h2>
+<h3>STRAY NOTES ON CUNNINGHAM'S LONDON.</h3>
+<p>The following notes are so trivial, that I should have scrupled
+to send them on any other ground than that so well-conceived and
+labouriously-executed a work should have its most minute and
+unimportant details as correct as possible. This, in such a work,
+can only be effected by each reader pointing out the circumstances
+that he has reason to believe are not quite correctly or completely
+given in it.</p>
+<p>Page 24. <i>Astronomical Society.</i>&mdash;The library has been
+recently augmented by the incorporation with it of the books and
+documents (as well as the members) of the <i>Mathematical Society
+of London</i> (Spitalfields). It contains the most complete
+collection of the English mathematical works of the last century
+known to exist. A friend, who has examined them with some care,
+specifies particularly some of the tracts published in the
+controversy raised by Bishop Berkeley respecting "the ghosts of
+departed quantities," of which he did before know the
+existence.</p>
+<p>The instruments to which Mr. Cunningham refers as bequeathed to
+the Society, are not used there, nor yet allowed to lie unused.
+They are placed in the care of active practical observers,
+according as the special character of the instruments and the
+special subjects to which each observer more immediately devotes
+his attention, shall render the assignment of the instrument
+expedient. The instruments, however, still remain the property of
+the Society.</p>
+<p>P. 37. <i>Bath House.</i>&mdash;Date omitted.</p>
+<p>P. 143.&mdash;Evan's Hotel, Covent Garden, is described as
+having been once the residence of "James West, the great collector
+of books, &amp;c., and <i>President of the Royal Society</i>."
+There has certainly never been a President, or even a Secretary, of
+that name. However, it is just possible that there might have been
+a Vice-president so named (as these are chosen by the President
+from the members of the council, and the council has not always
+been composed of men of science): but even this is somewhat
+doubtful.</p>
+<p>P. 143. <i>Covent Garden Theatre.</i>&mdash;No future account of
+this theatre will be complete without the facts connected with the
+ill-starred Delafield; just as, into the Olympic, the history of
+the defaulter Watts, of the Globe Assurance Office, must also
+enter.</p>
+<p>P. 143. near top of col. 2. "Heigho! says Kemble."&mdash;Before
+this period, a variation of the <i>rigmarole</i> upon which this is
+founded had become poplular, from the humour of Liston's singing at
+Sadler's Wells. I have a copy of the music and the words;
+altogether identical with those in the music. Of these, with other
+matters connected with the <span class="pagenum"><a name="page290"
+id="page290"></a>{290}</span> amorous frog, I shall have something
+more to say hereafter. This notice is to be considered incidental,
+rather than as referring expressly to Mr. Cunningham's valuable
+book.</p>
+<p>P. 153. <i>Deans Yard, Westminster.</i>&mdash;Several of the
+annual budgets of abuse, obscenity, and impudent imposture, bearing
+on their title-pages various names, but written by "John Gadbury,
+Student in Physic and Astrology," were dated from "my house, Brick
+Court, Dean's Yard, Westminster;" or this slightly varied,
+occasionally being, "Brick Court, <i>near</i> the Dean's Yard,"
+&amp;c. I have not seen a complete series of Gadbury's
+<i>Almanacks</i>, but those I refer to range from 1688 to 1694
+(incomplete). His burial in St. Margaret's, Westminster, in 1704,
+is noticed by Mr. Cunningham, at p. 313. As brick was then only
+used in the more costly class of domestic buildings, this would
+seem to indicate that <i>prophecy</i> was then a lucrative trade;
+and that the successor and pupil of the "arch-rogue, William Lilly"
+was quite as fortunate in his speculations as his master had been.
+It is a truth as old as society itself, that "knaves grow rich
+while honest men starve." Whilst Gadbury was "wallowing in plenty,"
+the author of <i>Hudibras</i> was perishing for want of a
+crust!</p>
+<p>P. 153. <i>Denzil Street.</i>&mdash;Here, about the middle of
+the street, on the south side, lived Theophilus Holdred, a jobbing
+watchmaker, whose name will always hold a place in one department
+of mathematical history. He discovered a method of approximating to
+the roots of numerical equations, of considerable ingenuity. He,
+however, lost in his day and generation the reputation that was
+really due to him for it, by his laying claim to more than he had
+effected, and seeking to deprive other and more gifted men of the
+reputation due to a more perfect solution of the same problem. He
+was, indeed, brought before the public as the tool of a faction;
+and, as the tools of faction generally are, he was sacrificed by
+his own supporters when he was no longer of any use to them.</p>
+<p>I once called upon him, in company with Professor Leyburn, of
+the Royal Military College, but I forget whether in 1829 or 1830.
+We found him at his bench&mdash;a plain, elderly, and heavy-looking
+personage. He seemed to have become "shy" of our class, and some
+time and some address were requisite to get him to speak with any
+freedom: but ultimately we placed him at his ease, and he spoke
+freely. We left him with the conviction that he was the
+<i>bon&acirc; fide</i> discoverer of his own method; and that he
+had no distinct conception, even then, of the principle of the
+methods which he had been led by his friends to claim, of having
+<i>also</i> discovered <i>Horner's</i> process before Horner
+himself had published it. He did not (ten years after the
+publication of Horner's method) even then understand it. He
+understood his own perfectly, and I have not the slightest doubt of
+the correctness of his own statement, of its having been discovered
+by him fifty years before.</p>
+<p>P. 166. <i>Dulwich Gallery.</i>&mdash;This is amongst the
+unfortunate consequences of taking lists upon trust. Poor Tom
+Hurst<a id="footnotetag1" name="footnotetag1"></a><a href=
+"#footnote1"><sup>1</sup></a> has not been in the churchyard these
+last eight years&mdash;except the three last in his grave. The last
+five years of his life were spent in a comfortable asylum, as "a
+poor brother of the Charterhouse." He was one of the victims of the
+"panic of 1825;" and though the spirit of speculation never left
+him, he always failed to recover his position. He is referred to
+here, however, to call Mr. Cunningham's attention to the necessity,
+in a <i>Hand-book</i> especially, of referring his readers
+correctly to the places at which <i>tickets</i> are to be obtained
+for any purpose whatever. It discourages the visitor to London when
+he is thus "sent upon a fool's errand;" and the Cockney himself is
+not in quite so good a humour with the author for being sent a few
+steps out of his way.</p>
+<p>P. 190. <i>Rogers</i>&mdash;a Cockney by inference. I
+<span class="pagenum"><a name="page291" id=
+"page291"></a>{291}</span> should like to see this more decidedly
+established. I am aware that it is distinctly so stated by Chambers
+and by Wilkinson; but a remark once made to me by Mrs. Glendinning
+(the wife of Glendinning, the printer, of Hatton Garden) still
+leads me to press the inquiry.</p>
+<p>P. 191.&mdash;<i>The Free Trade Club</i> was dissolved before
+the publication of this edition of the <i>Handbook</i>.</p>
+<p>P. 192.&mdash;And to Sir John Herschel, on his return from the
+Cape of Good Hope.</p>
+<p>P. 210. <i>Royal Society.</i>&mdash;From a letter of Dr. Charles
+Hutton, in the <i>Newcastle Magazine</i> (vol. i. 2nd series), it
+appears that at the time of Dr. Dodd's execution the Fellows were
+in the habit of adjourning, after the meetings, to Slaughter's
+Coffee House, "to eat oysters," &amp;c. The celebrated John Hunter,
+who had attempted to resuscitate the ill-fated Doctor, was one of
+them. "The Royal Society Club" was instituted by Sir Joseph
+Banks.</p>
+<p>P. 221. <i>Hanover Square.</i>&mdash;Blank date.</p>
+<p>P. 337. <i>Millbank Prison.</i>&mdash;It was designed, not by
+"Jeremy Bentham," but by his brother, the great mechanist, Sir
+Samuel Bentham. In passing, it may be remarked that the Royal
+Military Academy, Woolwich, is constructed on the same principle,
+and, as was stated in the <i>Mechanics' Magazine</i>, on authority,
+a year or two ago, by the same engineer. General rumour has,
+however, attributed the design to his gracious Majesty George III;
+and its being so closely in keeping with the known spirit of
+<i>espionage</i> of that monarch certainly gave countenance to the
+rumour. It may be as well to state, however, that, so designed and
+so built, it has never yet been so used.</p>
+<p>P. 428.&mdash;<i>Benbow</i>, not a native of Wapping, but of
+Shrewsbury. A life of him was published nearly forty years ago, by
+that veteran of local and county history, Mr. Charles Hulbert, in
+the <i>Salopian Magazine</i>.</p>
+<p>P. 499. <i>Whitfield.</i>&mdash;Certainly not the founder of the
+Methodists, in the ordinary or recognised acceptation of the term.
+John Wesley was at the head of that movement from the very first,
+and George Whitfield and Charles Wesley were altogether subordinate
+to him. Wesley and Whitfield parted company on the ground of
+Arminianism <i>versus</i> Calvinism. For a while the two sects kept
+the titles of "Arminian Methodists" and "Calvinistic Methodists."
+The latter made but little ground afterwards, and the distinctive
+adjective was dropped by the Wesleyans when the Whitfieldites had
+ceased to be a prominent body.</p>
+<p>P. 515. <i>Doctor Dodd.</i>&mdash;The great interest excited in
+favour of a commutation of his sentence, led to the belief at the
+time, that his life had not been really sacrificed. Many plausible
+stories respecting the Doctor having been subsequently seen alive,
+were current; and as they may possibly in some future age be
+revived, and again pass into general currency, it may be as well to
+state that the most positive evidence to the contrary exists, in a
+letter of Dr. Hutton's before referred to. The <i>attempt to
+resuscitate him was actually made</i>, by a no less distinguished
+surgeon than John Hunter. He seemed then to attribute the failure
+to his having <i>received the body too late</i>. Wonderful effects
+were at that time expected to result from the discovery of
+galvanism; but it would have been wonderful indeed if any
+restoration had taken place after more than two hours of suspended
+animation. John Hunter, according to the account, does not seem to
+have been very communicative on the subject, even to his
+philosophical friends at Slaughter's Oyster Rooms.</p>
+<p class="author">T.S.D.</p>
+<p>Shooter's Hill.</p>
+<blockquote class="footnote"><a id="footnote1" name=
+"footnote1"></a><b>Footnote 1:</b><a href=
+"#footnotetag1">(return)</a>
+<p>It may not be out of place here to mention one fine feature in
+the character of "Tom Hurst;" his deep reverence for men of
+ability, whether in literature, science, or art. Take one
+instance:</p>
+<p>Fourteen or fifteen years ago, I called one morning at his place
+of business (then 65. St. Paul's Church Yard, which has been
+subsequently absorbed into the "Religious Tract Depository"); and,
+as was my custom, I walked through the shop to his private room. He
+was "not in;" but a gentleman, who first looked at me and then at a
+portrait of me on the wall, accosted me by my surname as familiarly
+as an intimate acquaintance of twenty years would have done. He and
+Hurst, it appeared, had been speaking of me, suggested by the
+picture, before Hurst went out. The familiar stranger did not keep
+me long in suspense&mdash;he intimated that I had "probably heard
+our friend speak of Ben Haydon." Of course I had; and we soon got
+into an easy chat. Hurst was naturally a common subject with us.
+Amongst the remarks he made were the following, and in almost the
+words:&mdash;</p>
+<p>"When my troubles came on, I owed Hurst a large sum of money;
+and the circumstances under which I became his debtor rendered this
+peculiarly a debt of honour. He lent it me when he could ill spare
+it; yet he is the only one of all my creditors who has not in one
+way or other persecuted me to the present hour. When he first knew
+of my wreck, he called upon me&mdash;<i>not to reproach but to
+encourage me</i>&mdash;and he would not leave me till he felt sure
+that he had changed the moody current of my thoughts. If there be
+any change in him since then, it is in his increased kindness of
+manner and his assiduity to serve me. He is now gone out to try to
+sell 'a bit of daub' for me."</p>
+<p>Hurst came in, and this conversation dropped; but it had been
+well had Hurst been by his side on the day his last picture was
+opened to view at the Egyptian Hall. The catastrophe of that night
+might have been averted, notwithstanding Mr. Barnum and his Tom
+Thumb show in the adjoining room.</p>
+</blockquote>
+<hr />
+<h3>SATIRICAL SONG UPON GEORGE VILLIERS, DUKE OF BUCKINGHAM.</h3>
+<p>In turning over some old bundles of papers of the early part of
+the seventeenth century, I met with the following satirical
+effusion upon "James's infamous prime minister," George Villiers,
+Duke of Buckingham. As an echo of the popular feelings of the
+people at the time it was written, it merits preservation; and
+although I have seen other manuscript copies of the ballad, it has
+never yet, as far as I can learn, appeared in print.</p>
+<p>It appears to be a parody or paraphrase of a well-known ballad
+of the period, the burden of which attracted the notice of the
+satirist. It afterwards became a common vehicle of derision during
+the civil war, as may be seen by turning over the pages of the
+collection entitled <i>Rump Songs</i>, and the folio volumes of the
+king's pamphlets.</p>
+<p>The <i>original</i> of these parodies has hitherto eluded my
+researches. It is not among the Pepysian, Roxburghe, Wood, or Douce
+ballads, but perhaps some of your readers may be able to point it
+out in some public or private collection.</p>
+<div class="poem">
+<div class="stanza">
+<p>"Come heare, Lady Muses, and help mee to sing,</p>
+<p class="i2">Come love mee where I lay;</p>
+<p>Of a duke that deserves to be made a king&mdash;</p>
+<p class="i2">The cleane contrary way,</p>
+<p class="i2">O the cleane contrary way.</p>
+</div>
+<div class="stanza">
+<p>"Our Buckingham Duke is the man that I meane,</p>
+<p class="i2">Come love mee where I lay;</p>
+<p>On his shoulders the weale of the kingdome doth leane&mdash;</p>
+<p class="i2">The cleane contrary way,</p>
+<p class="i2">O the cleane contrary way.</p>
+</div>
+<div class="stanza">
+<p>"O happiest kingdome that ever was kind,</p>
+<p class="i2">Come love mee where I lay;</p>
+<p>And happie the king that hath such a friend&mdash;</p>
+<p class="i2">The cleane contrary way,</p>
+<p class="i2">O the cleane contrary way.</p>
+<span class="pagenum"><a name="page292" id=
+"page292"></a>{292}</span></div>
+<div class="stanza">
+<p>"Needs must I extoll his worth and his blood&mdash;</p>
+<p class="i2">Come love mee where I lay;</p>
+<p>And his sweet disposition soe milde and soe good&mdash;</p>
+<p class="i2">The cleane contrary way,</p>
+<p class="i2">O the cleane contrary way.</p>
+</div>
+<div class="stanza">
+<p>"Those innocent smiles that embelish his face,</p>
+<p class="i2">Come love mee where I lay;</p>
+<p>Who sees them not tokens of goodness and grace&mdash;</p>
+<p class="i2">The cleane contrary way,</p>
+<p class="i2">O the cleane contrary way.</p>
+</div>
+<div class="stanza">
+<p>"And what other scholler could ever arise,</p>
+<p class="i2">Come love mee where I lay;</p>
+<p>From a master that was soe sincere and wise&mdash;</p>
+<p class="i2">The cleane contrary way,</p>
+<p class="i2">O the cleane contrary way.</p>
+</div>
+<div class="stanza">
+<p>"Who is hee could now from his grave but ascend,</p>
+<p class="i2">Come love mee where I lay;</p>
+<p>Would surely the truth of his service commend&mdash;</p>
+<p class="i2">The cleane contrary way,</p>
+<p class="i2">O the cleane contrary way.</p>
+</div>
+<div class="stanza">
+<p>"The king understands how he honors his place,</p>
+<p class="i2">Come love me where I lay;</p>
+<p>Which is to his majestie noe little grace&mdash;</p>
+<p class="i2">The cleane contrary way,</p>
+<p class="i2">O the cleane contrary way.</p>
+</div>
+<div class="stanza">
+<p>"And therefore the government justly hath hee,</p>
+<p class="i2">Come love mee where I lay;</p>
+<p>Of horse for the land, and shipps for the sea&mdash;</p>
+<p class="i2">The cleane contrary way,</p>
+<p class="i2">O the cleane contrary way.</p>
+</div>
+<div class="stanza">
+<p>"What, though our fleet be our enemies debtor,</p>
+<p class="i2">Come love mee where I lay;</p>
+<p>Wee brav'd them once, and wee'l brave them better&mdash;</p>
+<p class="i2">The cleane contrary way,</p>
+<p class="i2">O the cleane contrary way.</p>
+</div>
+<div class="stanza">
+<p>"And should they land heere they should bee disjointed,</p>
+<p class="i2">Come love mee where I lay;</p>
+<p>And find both our horse and men bravely appointed&mdash;</p>
+<p class="i2">The cleane contrary way,</p>
+<p class="i2">O the cleane contrary way.</p>
+</div>
+<div class="stanza">
+<p>"Then let us sing all of this nobel duke's praise,</p>
+<p class="i2">Come love mee where I lay;</p>
+<p>And pray for the length of his life and his daies&mdash;</p>
+<p class="i2">The cleane contrary way,</p>
+<p class="i2">O the cleane contrary way.</p>
+</div>
+<div class="stanza">
+<p>"And when that death shall close up his eyes,</p>
+<p class="i2">Come love mee where I lay;</p>
+<p>God take him up into the skies&mdash;</p>
+<p class="i2">The cleane contrary way,</p>
+<p class="i2">O the cleane contrary way."</p>
+</div>
+</div>
+<p class="author">EDWARD F. RIMBAULT.</p>
+<hr />
+<h3>"WHOLE DUTY OF MAN," AUTHOR OF.</h3>
+<h4>(From Baker's MSS, vol. xxxv. p. 469-470. Cambridge University
+Library.)</h4>
+<blockquote>
+<p>"Octo'r 31. 1698. Mr. Thomas Caulton, Vicar of Worksop, &amp;c.
+[as in the note p. xiii. to the editor's Preface, ed. 1842, with
+unimportant variations, such as <i>Madam Frances Heathcote</i>,
+where the printed copy has <i>Mrs. Heathcote</i>; Baker reads
+<i>Madam Ayre of Rampton after dinner took</i>, where the printed
+copy has, <i>Mrs. Eyre</i>. After <i>was dead</i>, follows in
+Baker,] and that in that Month she had buried her Husband and
+severall Relations, but that her comfort was, that by her Monthly
+Sacraments she participated still with them in the Communion of
+Saints.</p>
+<p>"Then she went to her Closet, and fetched out a Manuscript, w'ch
+she said was the original of the <i>Whole Duty of Man</i>, tied
+together and stitched, in 8'vo, like Sermon notes. She untied it,
+saying, it was Dr. Fell's Correction and that the Author was the
+Lady Packington (her Mother), in whose hand it was written.</p>
+<p>"To prove this, the s'd Mr. Caulton further added that she said,
+she had shewn it to Dr. Covell, Master of Christ's College<a id=
+"footnotetag2" name="footnotetag2"></a><a href=
+"#footnote2"><sup>2</sup></a> in Cambridge, Dr. Stamford, Preb. of
+York, and Mr. Banks the present Incumbent of the Great Church in
+Hull. She added, withall, that <i>The Decay of Christian Piety</i>
+was hers (The Lady Packington's) also, but disowned any of the rest
+to be her Mother's.</p>
+<p>"This is a true Copy of what I wrote, from Mr. Caulton's Mouth,
+two days before his Decease.</p>
+<p>"Witness my hand,</p>
+<p>"Nov. 15. 98.</p>
+<p>"JOHN HEWYT."</p>
+</blockquote>
+<blockquote>
+<p>"Bp. Fell tells us, that all these Tracts were written by the
+excellent Author (whom he makes to be one and the same person) at
+severall times, as y'e exigence of the Church, and the benefit of
+soules directed y'r composures; and that he (the Author) did
+likewise publish them apart, in the same order as they were made.
+The last, it seems (w'ch is <i>The Lively Oracles</i>), came out in
+1678, the very year Dr. Woodhead died. Had the Author liv'd longer,
+we should have had his Tract <i>Of the Government of the
+Thoughts</i>, a work he had undertaken; and certainly (as Bp. Fell
+hath told us), had this work been finished, 'twould have equall'd,
+if not excelled, whatever that inimitable hand had formerly wrote.
+Withall it may be observ'd, that the Author of these Tracts speaks
+of the great Pestilence, and of the great Fire of London, both w'ch
+happen'd after the Restoration, whereas Bp. Chappell died in 1649.
+And further, in sect. vii. of the <i>Lively Oracles</i>, n. 2., are
+these words, w'ch I think cannot agree to Bp. Chappell [and less to
+Mr. Woodhead]. <i>I would not be hasty in charging Idolatry upon
+the Church of Rome, or all in her Communion; but that their
+Image-Worship is a most futall snare, in w'ch vast numbers of
+unhappy Souls are taken, no Man can doubt, who hath with any Regard
+travailed in Popish Countries: I myself, and thousands of others,
+whom the late troubles, or other occasions, sent abroad, are, and
+have been witnesses thereof</i>. <span class="pagenum"><a name=
+"page293" id="page293"></a>{293}</span> These words seem to have
+been spoke by one that had been at Rome, and was forced into those
+Countries after the troubles broke out here. But as for Chappell,
+he never was at Rome, nor in any of those Countries.</p>
+<p>"As for Archbp. Stern, no Man will believe him to have any just
+Title to any of these Tracts. [The last Passage concerning
+idolatry, will not agree with Mr. Woodhead, nor the rest with Lady
+Packington.]</p>
+<p>"In a letter from Mr. Hearne, dat. Oxon, Mar. 27, 1733, said by
+Dr. Clavering, Bp. of Petr. to be wrote by one Mr. Basket, a
+Clergyman of Worcestershire. See Dr. Hamond's <i>Letters</i>
+published by Mr. Peck, et ultra Qu&aelig;re."</p>
+</blockquote>
+<p>On so disputed a point as the authorship of the <i>Whole Duty of
+Man</i>, your readers will probably welcome any discussion by one
+so competent to form an opinion in such matters as Hearne.</p>
+<p>The letter above given was unknown to the editor of Mr.
+Pickering's edition.</p>
+<p class="author">J.E.B. MAYOR.</p>
+<p>Marlborough College.</p>
+<blockquote class="footnote"><a id="footnote2" name=
+"footnote2"></a><b>Footnote 2:</b><a href=
+"#footnotetag2">(return)</a>
+<p>The printed copy has <i>Trinity</i> College.</p>
+</blockquote>
+<hr />
+<h3>MISTAKE ABOUT GEORGE WITHER.</h3>
+<p>In Campbell's <i>Notices of the British Poets</i> (edit. 1848 p.
+234.) is the following, passage from the short memoir of George
+Wither:&mdash;</p>
+<blockquote>
+<p>"He was even afraid of being put to some mechanical trade, when
+he contrived to get to London, and with great simplicity had
+proposed to try his fortune at court. To his astonishment, however,
+he found that it was necessary to flatter in order to be a
+courtier. To show his independence, he therefore wrote his
+<i>Abuses Whipt and Stript</i>, and, instead of rising at court,
+was committed for some months to the Marshalsea."</p>
+</blockquote>
+<p>The author adds a note to this passage, to which Mr. Peter
+Cunningham (the editor of the edition to which I refer) appends the
+remark inclosed between brackets:&mdash;</p>
+<blockquote>
+<p>"He was imprisoned for his <i>Abuses Whipt and Stript</i>; yet
+this could not have been his first offence, as an allusion is made
+to a former accusation. [It was for <i>The Scourge</i> (1615) that
+his first known imprisonment took place.]"</p>
+</blockquote>
+<p>I cannot discover upon any authority sufficient ground for Mr.
+Campbell's note resecting a <i>former</i> accusation against
+Wither. He was undoubtedly imprisoned for his <i>Abuses Whipt and
+Stript</i>, which first appeared in print in 1613, but I do not
+think an <i>earlier</i> offence can be proved against him. It has
+been supposed, upon the authority of a passage in the <i>Warning
+Piece to London</i>, that the first edition of this curious work
+appeared in 1611; but I am inclined to think that the
+lines,&mdash;</p>
+<div class="poem">
+<div class="stanza">
+<p>"In sixteen hundred ten and one,</p>
+<p>I notice took of public crimes,"</p>
+</div>
+</div>
+<p>refers to the period at which the "Satirical Essays" were
+<i>composed</i>. Mr. Willmott, however (<i>Lives of the Sacred
+Poets</i>, p. 72.), thinks that they point to an earlier
+publication. But it is not likely that Wither would so soon again
+have committed himself by the publication of the <i>Abuses</i> in
+1613, if he had suffered for his "liberty of speech" so shortly
+before.</p>
+<p>Mr. Cunningham's addition to Mr. Campbell's note is incorrect.
+The <i>Scourge</i> is part of the <i>Abuses Whipt and Stript</i>
+printed in 1613 (a copy of which is now before me), to which it
+forms a postscript. Wood, who had never seen it, speaks of it as a
+<i>separate</i> publication; but Mr. Willmott has corrected this
+error, although he had only the means of referring to the edition
+of the <i>Abuses</i> printed in 1615. Mr. Cunningham's note, that
+Wither was imprisoned for the <i>Scourge</i> in 1615, is a mistake;
+made, probably, by a too hasty perusal of Mr. Willmott's charming
+little volume on our elder sacred poets.</p>
+<p class="author">EDWARD F. RIMBAULT.</p>
+<hr />
+<h3>USEFUL VERSUS USELESS LEARNING</h3>
+<p>A single and practical plan for the formation of a complete and
+useful library and <i>respository</i> of <i>universal</i> literary
+knowledge.</p>
+<p>The design which I propose in the following few lines, is one
+which I should imagine nearly all the more learned and literary of
+your readers would <i>wish</i> to see <i>already in existence</i>
+and when I show that it might be effected <i>with very little
+trouble and expense</i> (indeed <i>no</i> trouble but such as would
+be a <i>pleasure</i> to those interested in the work), and that the
+greatest advantage would follow from it,&mdash;I hope that it may
+meet with favourable consideration from some of the numerous, able,
+and influential readers and correspondents of your journal.</p>
+<p>I am the more induced to hope this from the fact of such a wish
+having been partially expressed by some of your contributors, and
+the excellent leading articles of Nos. 1 and 2.</p>
+<p>What I propose is simply this: the SYSTEMATIC ARRANGEMENT of
+<i>all</i> the existing literary knowledge in the world that is
+considered <i>of value</i> by those best qualified to judge,
+disposed in such a manner as to answer these two purposes: 1st, to
+give a general connected and classified <i>view</i> of the literary
+treasures of the whole world, beginning from the most ancient in
+each language and department (including only what is valuable in
+each); and, 2dly, to afford the greatest possible <i>facility</i>
+(by means of arrangement, references and <i>indexes</i>) to every
+inquirer for finding <i>at once</i> the information he is in search
+of, if it is to be found <i>anywhere</i> by looking for it.</p>
+<p>There are two ways in which this work might be accomplished,
+both of which were desirable, though even one only would be much
+better than none.</p>
+<p>The first and most complete is, to make a real COLLECTION of all
+those works, arranged in the <span class="pagenum"><a name=
+"page294" id="page294"></a>{294}</span> most perfect systematic
+order; and, while doing so, to make at the same time a
+corresponding classified <i>Catalogue</i>.</p>
+<p>The chief (and almost the only) <i>difficulty</i> in the way of
+this would be, to find a <i>room</i> (or suite of rooms) to contain
+such a library and repository; but such would probably be found if
+sought.</p>
+<p>The other way in which this object might be attained is by the
+formation of a simple CATALOGUE in the same order, such as does
+already exist and lies open for public use (though only in
+manuscript, and not so accurately classified as might be) in the
+noble library of the Dublin University.</p>
+<p>This plan would be <i>far easier</i> than (besides forming the
+best possible <i>basis</i> for) that so urgently advocated by MR.
+BOLTON CORNEY (Vol. i. pp. 9, 42, 43.).</p>
+<p>Of course so extensive a design would require to be distributed
+among many hundred persons; but so does any great work: while, by
+each individual undertaking that department in which he is most
+interested and most experienced, the whole might be accomplished
+easily and pleasantly.</p>
+<p>The great fault of antiquarians is, that they are constantly
+<i>beginning at the wrong end</i>: they fix on some one piece of
+information that they want to get, and devote a world of labour to
+hunting about in all directions for anything bearing on the
+subject; whereas the rational way obviously is, to have the whole
+existing mass of (valuable) knowledge <i>classified</i>, and then
+the inquirer would know <i>where</i> to look for his purpose.</p>
+<p>Of course there will always remain much knowledge of a
+miscellaneous and irregular nature which is picked up by accident,
+and does not come within the scope of the present design; but this
+is generally of a trifling and fugitive kind, and does not at all
+controvert the principle above laid down.</p>
+<p>In conclusion, I have worked out a tolerably complete series of
+arrangements for the above design, showing its practicability as
+well as usefulness, which will be much at the service of any one
+who can use them for the furtherance of that object.</p>
+<p class="author">W. D.</p>
+<hr />
+<h3>MINOR NOTES.</h3>
+<p><i>Numerals.</i>&mdash;For the old Indian forms, see Prinsep's
+<i>Journal Asiatic Soc. Bengal</i>, 1838, p. 348. The prospectus of
+<i>Brugsh, Numerorum apud Egyptios Demoticorum Doctrina</i>,
+Berlin, promises to give from papyri and inscriptions not only the
+figures, but the forms of operation. Probably the system assumed
+its present form by the meeting of the Indian and Egyptian traders
+at some emporium near the mouth of the Indus. Peacock seems to give
+undue weight to the fact, that the Tibetans have a copious
+nomenclature for high numbers: their arithmetic, doubtless, came
+with their alphabet, and the Buddhist legends from India.</p>
+<p class="author">F.Q.</p>
+<p><i>Junnius and Sir Philip Francis.</i>&mdash;A few years ago, an
+aged intelligent person named Garner was living at Belgrave, near
+Leicester. I have heard him say that, when he was a farm bailiff to
+Lord Thanet, at Sevenoaks, in Kent, Sir Philip Francis was a
+frequent visitor there, and had a private room set apart for
+literary occupation. On one occasion, when he (Mr. Garner) was
+riding over the farm with Sir Philip Francis, the former alluded to
+one of the replies to Junius, by a clergyman who had been the
+subject of the "Great Unknown's" anonymous attacks, adding, "They
+say, Sir Philip, you are Junius." Sir Philip did not deny that he
+was the man, but simply smiled at the remark. This, and other
+circumstances coupled with the fact of Sir Philip's frequent visits
+to the house of so noted a politician as Lord Thanet, rendered Mr.
+Garner a firm believer in the identity of Sir Philip and Junius to
+the end of his days.</p>
+<p class="author">JAYTEE.</p>
+<p><i>Jews under the Commonwealth</i> (Vol. i., pp. 401. 474.; vol
+ii., p. 25.).&mdash;There is a confirmation of the story of the
+Jews being in treaty for St. Paul's and the Oxford Library in a
+passage in Carte's <i>Letters</i>, i. 276, April 2,
+1649:&mdash;</p>
+<blockquote>
+<p>"They are about demolishing and selling cathedral churches. I
+hear Norwich is designed already, and that the Jews proffer
+600,000<i>l.</i> for Paul's and Oxford Library, and may have them
+for 200,000<i>l.</i> more."</p>
+</blockquote>
+<p class="author">CH.</p>
+<p>"<i>Is anything but," &amp;c.</i>&mdash;As your work seems
+adapted, amongst other subjects, to check the introduction into our
+language of undesirable words, phrases, and forms of speech, I
+would call the attention of your readers to the modern phrases, "is
+anything but," and the like, which have lately crept into use, and
+will be found, in many (otherwise) well-written books.</p>
+<p>I read the phrase "is anything but," for the first time, in
+Napier's <i>Peninsular War</i>; where it struck me as being so much
+beneath the dignity of historical composition, and at the same time
+asserting an impossibility, that I meditated calling the author's
+attention to it. The not unfrequent use of the same phrase by other
+writers, since that time, has by no means reconciled me to its
+use.</p>
+<p>In the <i>Edinburgh Review</i> for January last (1850) I find
+the following sentence:&mdash;"But as pains have been taken to fix
+the blame <i>upon any one except</i> the parties culpable;" and in
+the July number of the same <i>Review</i> (p. 90.) occurs the
+sentence, "<i>any impulse rather than</i> that of patriotism,"
+&amp;c.</p>
+<p>Now, a "thing," or "person," or "impulse,"&mdash;though it may
+not be the "thing," or "person," or "impulse" charged as the
+agent,&mdash;must yet be some <i>certain</i> and <i>specific</i>
+thing, or party, or impulse, <span class="pagenum"><a name=
+"page295" id="page295"></a>{295}</span> if existing as an agent at
+all in the matter; and cannot be "<i>any</i> thing," or "<i>any</i>
+party," or "<i>any</i> impulse," in the <i>indefinite</i> sense
+intended in these phrases. Moreover, there seems no difficulty in
+expressing, in a simple and direct manner, that the agent was a
+very different, or opposite, or dissimilar "thing," or "person," or
+"impulse" from that supposed.</p>
+<p>I wish some persons of competent authority in the science of our
+language (and many such there are who write in your pages) would
+take up this subject, with a view to preserve the purity of it; and
+would also, for the future, exercise a watchful vigilance over the
+use, for the <i>first</i> time, of any incorrect, or low words or
+phrases, in composition; and so endeavour to confine them to the
+vulgar, or to those who ape the vulgar in their style.</p>
+<p class="author">P.H.F.</p>
+<p><i>Fastitocalon.</i>&mdash;<i>Fastitocalon. Cod. Exon.</i> fol.
+96. b. p. 360. 18. read [Greek: Aspido ... chelonae]. Tychsen,
+<i>Physiologus Syrus</i>, cap. xxx.: did the digamma get to
+Crediton by way of Cricklade?</p>
+<p class="author">F.Q.</p>
+<hr class="full" />
+<h2>QUERIES</h2>
+<h3>BISHOP COSIN'S CONFERENCE.</h3>
+<p>Basire in his <i>Dead Man's Real Speech</i> (pp. 59, 60.),
+amongst other "notable instances" of Bishop Cosin's zeal and
+constancy in defence of the Church of England, mentions</p>
+<blockquote>
+<p>"A solemn conference both by word and writing betwixt him and
+the Prior of the English Benedictines at Paris, supposed to be
+Robinson. The argument was concerning the validity of the
+ordination of our priests, &amp;c., in the Church of England. The
+issue was, our Doctor had the better so far, that he could never
+get from the Prior any reply to his last answer. This conference
+was undertaken to fix a person of honour then wavering about that
+point; the sum of which conference (as I am informed), was written
+by Dr. Cosin to Dr. Morley, the now Right Reverend Lord Bishop of
+Winchester, in two letters bearing date June 11, July 11,
+1645."</p>
+</blockquote>
+<p>The substance of this conference has been preserved among the
+Smith Manuscripts in the Bodleian Library; but it is not in the
+form of letters to Dr. Morley. Vol. xl. of this valuable collection
+of manuscripts contains (as described in Smith's table of
+contents):&mdash;</p>
+<blockquote>
+<p>1. "Papers of Bp. Cosins in defence of the Ordination of the
+Church of England against father Prior.</p>
+<p>"The first of these is Bp. Cosin's Review of the Father's
+Letter, &amp;c. [the title-page is placed at p. 77.]</p>
+<p>"Then follows a letter (which is indeed the Bishop's first
+paper, and should be put first) from Bishop Cosin to the
+Father.</p>
+<p>"After that the Father's Answer to Bishop Cosin's Review at p.
+81.</p>
+<p>"Then come two other papers about the validity of our
+Ordination, with a preface concerning the occasion, p. 89."</p>
+<p>2. "Then, p. 101., A Letter from a <i>Rom. Cath.</i> to a Lady
+about communicating in one kind,&mdash;with Bishop Cosin's
+Answer."</p>
+<p>3. "Lastly, in p. 123., is A Letter of Bp. Cosin's to Dr.
+Collins concerning the Sabbath."</p>
+</blockquote>
+<p>The order in which the papers under the first head, about our
+English ordination, should fall, appears to be as
+follows:&mdash;</p>
+<p>1. There is a note attached to p. 65., evidently written by Dr.
+Tho. Smith himself in the following words:</p>
+<blockquote>
+<p>"Transcript of several papers of Bishop Cosin's sent to me by
+Dr. J. Smith, Prebendary of Durham.&mdash;T.S."</p>
+</blockquote>
+<p>2. At p. 77. the title-page is given thus:</p>
+<blockquote>
+<p>"A Review of a Letter sent from F.P.R. to a Lady (whom he would
+have persuaded to the Rom. party) in Opposition to a former paper
+given him for the defence of the Church of England in the
+Ordination of Priests."</p>
+</blockquote>
+<p>To this are appended the respective forms of ordering priests
+used in the Church of England and in the Roman Church.</p>
+<p>3. Then, at p. 89., we have the "occasion of this ... Discourse
+concerning the Ordination of Priests," &amp;c. This is a kind of
+preface, which contains the first paper that was given to the
+Prior, dated June 14, 1645; also another paper, bearing date July
+11, 1645, but ending abruptly in the middle of a sentence, and
+having written below it (probably in Dr. J. Smith's hand) the
+following note:</p>
+<blockquote>
+<p>"The rest of this is not yet found, and that which is written
+thus far is not in the Bishop's own hand, but the copy is very
+fair."</p>
+</blockquote>
+<p>However, this second paper (ending thus abruptly) appears to be
+no more than the first draft of a long letter from Cosin to the
+Prior, which commences at p. 65. of this MS., and which is dated
+"from the Court of S. Germains, July 11, 1645;" for not only does
+this letter bear the same <i>date</i> as the before-mentioned
+fragment, but it begins by complaining of the tone of expression in
+a letter evidently received from the Prior after the draft had been
+prepared, but before it was sent off; and it concludes with the
+following note appended as a postscript:</p>
+<blockquote>
+<p>"Sir,</p>
+<p>"The enclosed (most of it) was prepared for you a fortnight
+since; but now (upon the occasion given by your letter) you have it
+with some advantage from</p>
+<p>"Your servt., J.C.</p>
+<p>"I desire the fav"</p>
+<p>"S. Germ. July 12."</p>
+</blockquote>
+<p>4. The most important part of this MS., however, is contained in
+the long letter or treatise <span class="pagenum"><a name="page296"
+id="page296"></a>{296}</span> placed first in the volume, and
+bearing for its title, "A View of F.P.'s Answer to the First
+Paper."</p>
+<p>This is dated from S. Germains, July 25, 1645 and would appear
+to be Cosin's last letter. But, if it be really so, Basire must, I
+think, be in error, when he says, "Our Doctor ... could never get
+from the Prior any reply to his last answer." For at p. 81. of the
+MS. there is a reply to the above "Review of a Letter sent by F.R.
+to a Lady," &amp;c. which, though copied without either date or
+signature, was evidently written by the Prior, whilst it professes
+to be a reply to a treatise closely answering to Cosin's letter of
+July 25, but which letter the writer did not receive (as he states)
+before the 26th of September.</p>
+<p>I wish yet further to take notice, that Dr. Tho. Smith, in His
+<i>Vit&aelig;</i> (Lond. 1707, pr&aelig;f. pp. vii, viii.), refers
+to these manuscripts in the following satisfactory
+manner:&mdash;</p>
+<blockquote>
+<p>"Cum, post mortem D. Cosini, de pretio et valore schedarum, quas
+reliquit, h&aelig;redibus non satis constaret, ... auspieat&ograve;
+tandem devenit, ut favore, beneficio, et perquam insigni humanitate
+reverendi et doctissimi viri, D. Joannis Smith, Sacr&aelig;
+Theologi&aelig; Professoris Ecclesi&aelig; Dunelmensis
+Pr&aelig;bendarii, quorum frequens hac de re commercium literarum,
+occasione data, (opportun&egrave; intercedente pr&aelig;nobili et
+reverendo, D. Georgio Whelero, equite aurato, et Ecclesi&aelig;
+Anglican&aelig; Presbytero, ejusdem quoque Ecclesi&aelig;
+Cathedralis Prebendario), habui, duos libellos (tanquam
+pr&aelig;tiosas tabulas ab isthoc infami naufragio servatas) a D.
+Cosino, dum in Galli&acirc; exularet, Anglie&egrave; conscriptos
+jam possidieam: quarum unus <i>Vindicias Ordinatianum
+Ecclesie&aelig; Anglican&aelig;</i> contra exceptiones et
+cavillationes cujusdem Pontificii sacerdotis e gente nostra, alter
+<i>Responsionem ad Epistolam</i> nobili f&aelig;min&aelig;
+Angl&aelig; ab alio saccrdote <i>pro defensione communionis sub
+unic&acirc; specie administrand&aelig;</i> inscriptam,
+complectitur," &amp;c.</p>
+</blockquote>
+<p>I should still be glad to add to this long note the followng
+Queries:&mdash;</p>
+<p>1. Can any of your readers kindly inform me whether Cosin's two
+letters to Dr. Geo. Morley are still in existence, either in MS. or
+in print?</p>
+<p>2. Whether there be any fuller or more authentic account of the
+controversy than that in these MS. preserved by the care of Dr.
+Smith?</p>
+<p>3. Whether Cosin wrote any letter to the Prior <i>later</i> than
+that of July 25?</p>
+<p>4. Who was the <i>lady</i> the Prior wished to seduce to the
+Roman party?</p>
+<p>5. Is there any other account of the controversy?</p>
+<p class="author">J. SANSOM.</p>
+<hr />
+<h3>ENGELMAN'S BIBILIOTHECA SCRIPTORUM CLASSICORUM.</h3>
+<p>A little while ago, I ordered Engelman's <i>Bibliotheca
+Scriptoram Classicorum</i>, purporting to contain all such works
+published from 1700 to 1846. It was furnished to my bookseller by a
+foreign bookseller in <i>London</i> with an English title, having
+<i>his own</i> name on it as publisher, and an invitation to
+purchase the books described in it <i>from him</i>. As the paper
+and type were German, I objected and received in consequence a new
+English title, with the same name upon it, and a <i>shorter</i>
+invitation to purchase from him. I was captious enough to object
+even to this; and I then received a Leipzig title in German. But
+there still remains a difficulty: for this German title has also
+the name of a <i>Parisian</i> bookseller upon it, <i>a la maison
+duquel on peut s'adresser, &amp;c.</i> Now, as Engelman is a
+bookseller, and would probably not object to an order out of his
+own catalogue, of which he is both author and publisher, the
+preceding, circumstances naturally raise the following Queries:</p>
+<p>1. What is the real title-page of Engelman's <i>Catalogue</i> 2.
+Is the Parisian house accredited by Engelman; or has the former
+served the latter as the London house has Served both? 3. Is it not
+desirable that literary men should set their faces very decidedly
+against all and every the slightest alteration in the genuine
+description of a book? 4. Would it not be desirable that every such
+alteration should forthwith be communicate to your paper?</p>
+<p>The English title-page omits the important fact, that the
+<i>Catalogue</i> begins at 1700, and describes it as containing
+<i>all</i> editions, &amp;c., up to 1846.</p>
+<p class="author">A. DE MORGAN.</p>
+<p>September 24. 1850.</p>
+<hr />
+<h3>MINOR QUERIES.</h3>
+<p><i>Portrait of Sir P. Sidney, by Paul Veronese.</i>&mdash;In the
+letters of Sir P. Sidney which I found at Hamburg, and which were
+published by Pickering, 1845, it is stated that a portrait of
+Sidney was painted by Paul Veronese, at Venice, for Herbert
+Languet. It would be very interesting to discover the existence of
+this picture.</p>
+<p>Languet had it with him at Prague, <i>framed</i>, as he asserts,
+and hung up in his room, in the year 1575. He remarks upon it, in
+one place, that it represented Sidney as too young (he was nineteen
+when it was taken); in another place he says that it has given him
+too sad an expression. I should add, that on Languet's death, his
+property passed into the hands of his friend Du Plessis.</p>
+<p>I am led to write to you on this subject, by having observed, a
+few days since, in the collection at Blenheim, two portraits by
+Paul Veronese, of persons unknown. There may be many such, and that
+of Sir Philip Sidney may yet be identified.</p>
+<p class="author">STEUART A. PEARS.</p>
+<p>Harrow, Sept. 6.</p>
+<p><i>Confession.</i>&mdash;You would much oblige if you could
+discover the name of a Catholic priest, in <span class=
+"pagenum"><a name="page297" id="page297"></a>{297}</span> German
+history, who submitted to die rather than reveal a secret committed
+to him in confession?</p>
+<p class="author">U.J.B.</p>
+<p><i>Scotch Prisoners at Worcester.</i>&mdash;In Mr. Walcott's
+<i>History of St. Margaret's Church, Westminster</i>, I find the
+following extract from church wardens' accounts:&mdash;</p>
+<blockquote>
+<p>"1652. P'd to Thos. Wright for 67 loads of soyle laid on the
+graves in Tothill Fields, wherein 1200 Scotch prisoners, taken at
+the fight at Worcester, were buried; and for other pains taken with
+his teeme of horses, about mending the Sanctuary Highway, when Gen.
+Ireton was buried."</p>
+</blockquote>
+<p>I have taken the pains to verify this extract, and find the
+figures quite correctly given. I wish to put the Query: Is this
+abominable massacre in cold blood mentioned by any of our
+historians? But for such unexceptionable evidence, it would appear
+incredible.</p>
+<p class="author">C.F.S.</p>
+<p><i>Adamson's Reign of Edward II.</i>&mdash;</p>
+<blockquote>
+<p>"The Reigns of King Edward II., and so far of King Edward III.,
+as relates to the Lives and Actions of Piers Gaveston, Hugh de
+Spencer, and Roger Lord Mortimer, with Remarks thereon adapted to
+the present Time: Humbly addressed to all his Majesty's Subjects of
+Great Britain, &amp;c., by <i>J. Adamson</i>. Printed for J.
+Millar, near the Horse Guards, 1732, and sold by the Booksellers of
+London and Westminster, price One Shilling."</p>
+</blockquote>
+<p>The above is the title-page of a little work of eighty-six pages
+in my possession, which I am inclined to think is scarce. It
+appears to be a defence of the Walpole administration from the
+attacks of the <i>Craftsman</i>, a periodical of the time,
+conducted by Amhurst, who was supported by Bolinbroke and Pulteney,
+the leaders of the opposition. Is anything known of <i>J.
+Adamson</i>, the author?</p>
+<p class="author">H.A.E.</p>
+<p><i>Sir Thomas Moore.</i>&mdash;Can any of your readers give any
+account of Sir Thomas Moore, beyond what Victor tells of him in his
+<i>History</i> of the Theatre, ii. p. 144., "that he was the author
+of an absurd tragedy called <i>Mangora</i> (played in 1717), and
+was knighted by George I."</p>
+<p>In Pope's "Epistle to Arbuthnot," he writes&mdash;</p>
+<div class="poem">
+<div class="stanza">
+<p>"Arthur, whose giddy son leglects the laws."</p>
+</div>
+</div>
+<p>on which Warburton notes&mdash;</p>
+<div class="poem">
+<div class="stanza">
+<p>"<i>Arthur Moore, Esq.</i>"</p>
+</div>
+</div>
+<p>Who was <i>Arthur Moore, Esq.</i>? and who was the "giddy son?"
+Was the latter <i>James Moore Smith</i> a gentleman whose family
+name was, I think, <i>Moore</i>, and who assumed (perhaps for a
+fortune) the additional name of <i>Smith</i>? This gentleman Pope
+seems to call indiscriminately <i>Moore</i>, <i>Moor</i>, and
+<i>More</i>: and when he says that his good nature towards the
+dunces was so great that he had even "rhymed for Moor" (<i>Ib.</i>
+v. 373.), I cannot but suspect that the Moor <i>for</i> whom he had
+<i>rhymed</i>, was the <i>giddy son</i> whom <i>Arthur</i> accused
+him of seducing from the law to the Muses. There are many allusions
+to this Mr. James Moore Smith throughout Pope's satirical works,
+but all very obscure; and Warburton, though he appears to have
+known him, affords no explanation as to who or what he was. He was
+the author of a comedy called <i>The Rival Modes</i>.</p>
+<p>C.</p>
+<p><i>Dr. E. Cleaver, Bishop of Cork.</i>&mdash;I shall feel much
+obliged to any of your correspondents who will furnish me with the
+particulars of the consecration of Dr. Euseby Cleaver to the sees
+of Cork and Ross, in March, April, or May, 1789. Finding no record
+of the transaction in the Diocesan Registry of Cork, and not being
+able to trace it in any other part of <i>Ireland</i>, I am induced
+to believe that this consecration may have taken place in
+<i>England</i>; and shall be very glad to be correctly informed
+upon the point.</p>
+<p class="author">H. COTTON.</p>
+<p>Thurles, Ireland.</p>
+<p><i>Gwynn's London and Westminster.</i>&mdash;Mr. Thomas
+Frederick Hunt, in his <i>Exemplars of Tudor Architecture</i>, 4to.
+London, 1830, in a note at p. 23., alludes to <i>London and
+Westminster improved, by John Gywnn, London</i>, 1766, 4to., and
+has this remark:</p>
+<blockquote>
+<p>"It is a singular fact, that in this work John Gwynn pointed out
+almost all the designs for the improvement of London, which have
+been <i>devised</i> by the civil and military architects of the
+present day."</p>
+</blockquote>
+<p>And Mr. Hunt concludes by observing,, that&mdash;</p>
+<blockquote>
+<p>"This discovery was made by the <i>Literary Gazette</i>."</p>
+</blockquote>
+<p>Will you permit me, through the medium of your useful
+publication, to solicit information of the number and date of the
+<i>Literary Gazette</i> which recalled public attention to this
+very remarkable fact?</p>
+<p class="author">&sect;N.</p>
+<p><i>Coronet.</i>&mdash;In Newbold Church, in the county of
+Warwick, is a monument to the memory of Thomas Boughton of Lawford,
+and Elizabeth his wife, representing him in a suit of armour, with
+sword and spurs, <i>a coronet on his head</i>, and a bear at his
+feet, chained and muzzled. Query.&mdash;Can any of your readers
+give an accurate description of this coronet? Or can any of them
+mention instances of the monuments of esquires having similar
+coronets? The date of his death is not given: his wife died in the
+year 1454.</p>
+<p class="author">Z.</p>
+<p><i>Cinderella.</i>&mdash;Referring to Vol. ii., p. 214., allow
+me to ask in what edition of Perrault's <i>Fairy Tales</i> the
+misprint of <i>verre</i> from <i>vair</i> first occurs? what is the
+date of their first publication, as well as that of the translation
+under the title of <i>Mother Goose's Tales</i>? whether Perrault
+was the originator of <i>Cinderella</i>, or from what source he
+drew the tale? <span class="pagenum"><a name="page298" id=
+"page298"></a>{298}</span> what, moreover, is the authority for
+identifying <i>sable</i> with <i>vair</i> for the employment of
+either in designating the highest rank of princesses?</p>
+<p class="author">SANDVICENSIS.</p>
+<p><i>Judas' Bell, Judas' Candle</i> (Vol. i., pp. 195. 235.
+357.).&mdash;Some time since I asked the meaning of a Judas' Bell,
+and your learned correspondent CEPHAS replied that it was only a
+bell so christened after St. Jude, the apostle. However, it may
+have been connected with the Judas' tapers, which, according, to
+the subjoined entries, were used with the Paschal candle at Easter.
+May I trust to his kindness to explain its purport?</p>
+<blockquote>
+<p>"<i>Reading Parish Accompts</i>.</p>
+<p>"1499. Itm. payed for making leng' Mr. Smyth's molde wt. a Judas
+for the Pascall&mdash;vJd."</p>
+<p>"<i>St. Giles' Parish Accompts</i>.</p>
+<p>"A.D. 1514. Paid for making a Judas for Pascall iiijd."</p>
+<p>"<i>Churchwardens' Accompts of S. Martin, Outwich</i>.</p>
+<p>"1510. Paid to Randolf Merchaunt Wex Chandiler for the Pascall,
+the tapers affore the Rode, the Cross Candelles, and Judas
+Candelles&mdash;viiijs. iiijd."</p>
+<p>"<i>St. Margaret's, Westminster.</i></p>
+<p>"1524. Item payed for xij. Judacis to stand with the
+tapers&mdash;O ijd. O"</p>
+</blockquote>
+<p class="author">MACKENZIE WALCOTT, M.A., Oxon.</p>
+<p><i>Dozen of Bread; Baker's Dozen.</i>&mdash;In the <i>Chronicle
+of Queen Jane, and of Two Years of Queen Mary</i>, lately printed
+for the Camden Society (Appendix iv. p. 112.), it is stated that,
+amongst other particulars in the accounts of the Chamberlain of
+Colchester, at which place Mary was entertained on her way to
+London, there is:&mdash;"For xxxviii. <i>dozen of bread</i>,
+xxxixs." In the language of the county from which I write, "a dozen
+of bread" was (and I believe is yet) used to express either one
+loaf, value twelvepence or two loaves, value sixpence each: and
+even when the sizes and price of the loaves varied, it was used to
+express the larger loaf, or the two smaller loaves. A dozen of
+bread was also divided into six twopenny, or twelve penny
+loaves.</p>
+<p>But in the quotation above, thirty-eight dozen of bread are
+charged thirty-nine shillings; whereas the extra one shilling,
+cannot be divided into aliquot parts, so as to express the value of
+each of the thirty-eight dozen of bread.</p>
+<p>What was a dozen of bread in 1553?</p>
+<p>What is a <i>baker's dozen</i>, and why so called?</p>
+<p class="author">P.H.F.</p>
+<p><i>Kongs skuggsia.</i>&mdash;Is anything, precise known of the
+date and origin of the Icelandic Kongs skuggsia.</p>
+<p class="author">F.Q.</p>
+<p><i>Coins of Gandophares.</i>&mdash;Coins of Gandophares, an
+Indian prince, are described by Prinsep, <i>Jour. Asiatic Soc.
+Bengal</i>, and in Wilson's <i>Asiana</i>. The name is met with in
+the legends of St. Thomas can it be found elsewhere?</p>
+<p class="author">F.Q.</p>
+<p><i>Satirical Medals.</i>&mdash;Is any printed account to be
+found of a very elaborately executed series of caricature medals
+relating to the revolution of 1688?</p>
+<p class="author">F.Q.</p>
+<hr class="full" />
+<h2>REPLIES.</h2>
+<h3>GAUDENTIO DI LUCCA.</h3>
+<h4>(Vol. ii., p. 247.)</h4>
+<p>The work entitled <i>The Adventures of Sig. Gaudentio di
+Lucca</i> was published at London in 1737, in 1 vol. 8vo. It
+purports to be a translation from the Italian, by E.T. Gent but
+this is a mere fiction. The work is evidently an English
+composition. It belongs to the class of <i>Voyages Imaginaires</i>,
+and its main object is to describe the institutions and manners of
+the Mezoranians, an Utopian community, supposed to exist in the
+centre of Africa. Sig. Gaudentio is able, by an accident, to visit
+this people, by the way of Egypt, and to return to Europe; he
+resides at Bologna, where he falls under the suspicion of the
+Inquisition, and having been brought before that tribunal, he
+describes his former life, and his adventures in the country of the
+Mezoranians.</p>
+<p>A second London edition of this work, of the date of 1748, is
+mentioned in the <i>Gentleman's Magazine</i> for Jan. 1777. There
+is an edition in 12mo., printed at Edinburgh, 1761. And there is
+another London edition, in 8vo., of the year 1786. Copies of the
+editions of 1737 and 1786 are in the British Museum.</p>
+<p>There are two French translations of the work. One is of the
+date 1746, under the title of <i>M&eacute;moires de Gaudentio di
+Lucca</i>. The second, of 1754, by M. Dupuy Demportes, speaks of
+the first having been made by an Englishman named <i>Milts</i>; but
+the person and name appear to be fictitious. The first translation
+is said by Barbier, <i>Dict. des Anonymes</i>, No. 11,409, to have
+been revised by the Chevalier de Saint Germain, who made additions
+to it of his own invention. The second translation is reprinted in
+the collection of <i>Voyages Imaginaires</i>, Amsterdam et Paris,
+1787, tom. vi.</p>
+<p>An anonymous writer in the <i>Gent. Mag.</i> for Jan. 1777, vol.
+xlvii., p. 13., speaking of Bishop Berkeley, says that "the
+<i>Adventures of Signor Gaudentio di Lucca</i> have been generally
+attributed to him." The writer of the note added to the <i>Life of
+Berkeley</i> in Kippis's <i>Biogr. Brit.</i>, 1780, vol. ii. p.
+261., quotes this statement, and adds that the work is ascribed to
+him by the booksellers in their printed catalogues. This writer
+thinks that the authorship of Bp. Berkeley is consistent with the
+internal evidence of the book but he furnishes no positive
+testimony on the subject.</p>
+<span class="pagenum"><a name="page299" id=
+"page299"></a>{299}</span>
+<p>In a letter from Mr. J.C. Walker to Mr. Pinkerton, of 19 Jan.,
+1799 (published in Pinkerton's <i>Literary Correspondence</i>, vol.
+ii., p. 41.), Lord Charlemont is referred to as believing that
+Gaudentio di Lucca is founded in fact; that Bishop Berkeley, when
+he was at Cairo, conversed with persons who had attended a caravan,
+and that he learned from them what he narrated in the account of
+Gaudentio. This passage is cited in Southey's <i>Common-place
+Book</i>, p. 204; but the work is manifestly fictitious, and it
+does not appear that Berkeley, though he twice visited the
+Continent, was ever out of Europe.</p>
+<p>The date of the publication of Gaudentio is quite consistent
+with the authorship of Berkeley, who died in 1753; but the notice
+in the <i>Gentleman's Magazine</i> only proves the existence of a
+rumour to that effect; and the authentic <i>Life of Berkeley</i>,
+by Dr. Stock, chiefly drawn up from materials communicated by Dr.
+R. Berkeley, brother to the Bishop, and prefixed to the collected
+edition of his work (2 vols. 4to. Lond., 1784), makes no allusion
+to Gaudentio. There is nothing in the contents of this work which
+renders it likely that the authorship should have been carefully
+concealed by Bp. Berkeley and his family, if he had really been the
+author. The literary execution of Gaudentio is good; and it is
+probable that the speculative character of the work, and the fact
+that Berkeley had visited Italy, suggested the idea that he had
+composed it. The belief that Bishop Berkeley was the author of
+<i>Gaudentio di Lucca</i> may therefore be considered as
+unauthorised.</p>
+<p>The copy of the edition of <i>Gaudentio</i> of 1786, which is
+preserved in the British Museum, contains in the title-page the
+following note, in pencil:</p>
+<blockquote>
+<p>"Written originally in English by Dr. Swale of Huntingdon. See
+<i>Gent. Mag.</i> 1786."</p>
+</blockquote>
+<p>The <i>Gentleman's Magazine</i> for 1786 does not, however,
+contain any information about the authorship of <i>Gaudentio</i>;
+and the name of Dr. Swale appears to be unknown in literary
+history. At the same time, a positive entry of this sort, with
+respect to an obscure person, doubtless had some foundation. On the
+authority of this note, Dr. Swale is registered as the author of
+Gaudentio in the printed catalogue of the British Museum Library,
+whence it has passed into Watt's <i>Bibl. Brit.</i> Perhaps some of
+your correspondents, who are connected with Huntingdon, may be able
+to throw some light on Dr. Swale.</p>
+<p>Lastly, it should be added, that the writer of the article
+"Berkeley," in the <i>Biographic Universelle</i>, adverts to the
+fact that <i>Gaudentio di Lucca</i> has been attributed to him: he
+proceeds, however, to say that&mdash;</p>
+<blockquote>
+<p>"The author of a Life of Berkeley affirms that Berkeley is not
+the author of that book, which he supposes to have been written by
+a Catholic priest imprisoned in the Tower of London."</p>
+</blockquote>
+<p>I have been unable to trace the origin of this statement; nor do
+I know what is the <i>Life of Berkeley</i>, to which the writer in
+the <i>Biogr. Univ.</i> refers. The Life published under the
+direction of his family makes no allusion to Gaudentio, or to the
+belief that it was composed by Bishop Berkeley.</p>
+<p>The <i>Encyclop&eacute;die M&eacute;thodique</i>, div. "Econ.
+pol. et dipl." (Paris, 1784), tom. I. p. 89., mentions the
+following work:&mdash;</p>
+<blockquote>
+<p>"La R&eacute;publique des Philosophes, ou l'Histoire des
+Ajaoiens, relation d'un voyage du Chevalier S. van Doelvett en
+Orient en l'an 1674, qui contient la description du Gouvernement,
+de la Religion, et des Moeurs des Ajaoiens."</p>
+</blockquote>
+<p>It is stated that this romance, though composed a century
+before, had only been lately published. The editor attributed it to
+Fontenelle, but (as the writer in the <i>Encycl. M&eacute;th.</i>
+thinks) probably without reason. The title of Berkeley to the
+authorship of Gaudentio has doubtless no better foundation.</p>
+<p class="author">L.</p>
+<p class="note">[Dunlop, <i>Hist. Fiction</i>, iii. 491., speaks of
+this romance as "generally, and I believe on good grounds, supposed
+to be the work of the celebrated Berkeley;" adding, "we are told,
+in the life of this celebrated man, that Plato was his favourite
+author: and, indeed, of all English writers Berkeley has most
+successfully imitated the style and manner of that philosopher. It
+is not impossible, therefore, that the fanciful republic of the
+Grecian sage may have led Berkeley to write <i>Gaudentio di
+Lucca</i>, of which the principal object apparently is to describe
+a faultless and patriarchal form of governnent." The subject is a
+very curious one, and invites the further inquiry of our valued
+correspondent.&mdash;ED.]</p>
+<hr />
+<h3>ON A PASSAGE IN "THE TEMPEST."</h3>
+<p>I was indebted to MR. SINGER for one of the best emendations in
+the edition of Shakspeare I superintended (vol. vi. p. 559.), and I
+have too much respect for his sagacity and learning to pass,
+without observation, his remarks in "NOTES AND QUERIES" (Vol. ii.,
+p. 259.), on the conclusion of the speech of Ferdinand, in "The
+Tempest," Act iii., Sc. 1.:&mdash;</p>
+<div class="poem">
+<div class="stanza">
+<p>"But these sweet thoughts do even refresh my labours;</p>
+<p>Most busy, least when I do it."</p>
+</div>
+</div>
+<p>This is the way in which I ventured to print the passage,
+depending mainly upon the old copies. In the folio, 1623, where the
+play for the first time appeared, the last line stands:</p>
+<div class="poem">
+<div class="stanza">
+<p>"Most busie lest, when I doe it;"</p>
+</div>
+</div>
+<p>and in that of 1632,</p>
+<div class="poem">
+<div class="stanza">
+<p>"Most busie least, when I doe it:"</p>
+</div>
+</div>
+<span class="pagenum"><a name="page300" id=
+"page300"></a>{300}</span>
+<p>so that the whole merit I claim that of altering the place of a
+comma, thereby, as I apprehend, rendering the meaning of the poet
+evident. The principle upon which I proceeded throughout was that
+of making as little variation as possible from the ancient
+authorities: upon that principle I acted in the instance in
+question, and I frequently found that this was the surest mode of
+removing difficulties. I could not easily adduce a stronger proof
+of this position, than the six words on which the doubt at this
+time has been raised.</p>
+<p>Theobald made an important change in the old text, and his
+reading has been that generally adopted:&mdash;</p>
+<div class="poem">
+<div class="stanza">
+<p>"Most busy-less when I do it."</p>
+</div>
+</div>
+<p>In restoring the old text I had, therefore, to contend with
+prepossession, against which, it seems, the Rev. Mr. Dyce was not
+proof, although I only know it from MR. SINGER'S letter, never
+having looked into the book in which I suppose, the opinion is
+advanced.</p>
+<p>One reason why I should reject the substitution of "busy-less,"
+even if I had not a better mode of overcoming the difficulty, is
+properly adverted to by MR. SINGER, viz. that the word was not in
+use in the time of Shakspeare. The only authority for it, at any
+period, quoted in Todd's Johnson, is this very (as I contend)
+corrupted passage in the Tempest; I have not met with it at all in
+any of the older dictionaries I have been able to consult; and
+unless the Rev. Mr. Dyce have been more fortunate, he was a little
+short-sighted, as well as a little angry, when he wrote his note
+upon mine. Had he taken more time to reflect, he might have found
+that after all Theobald and I are not so much at odds, although he
+arrives at his end by varying from, and I at mine by adhering to,
+the ancient authorities. In fact, I gain some confirmation of what,
+I believe, is the true meaning of Shakspeare, out of the very
+corruption Theobald introduced, and the Rev. Mr. Dyce, to my
+surprise, supports. I should have expected him to be the very last
+man who would advocate an abandonment of what has been handed down
+to us in every old edition of the play.</p>
+<p>The key of the whole speech of Ferdinand is contained in its
+very outset:&mdash;</p>
+<div class="poem">
+<div class="stanza">
+<p>"There be some sports are painful, and their labour</p>
+<p>Delight in them sets off;"</p>
+</div>
+</div>
+<p>and the poet has said nearly the same thing in "Macbeth:"</p>
+<div class="poem">
+<div class="stanza">
+<p>"The labour we delight in physics pain."</p>
+</div>
+</div>
+<p>It is because Ferdinand delights in the labour that he does not
+feel it irksome:</p>
+<div class="poem">
+<div class="stanza">
+<p>"This my mean task</p>
+<p>Would be as heavy to me as odious; but</p>
+<p>The mistress which I serve quickens what's dead,</p>
+<p>And makes my labours pleasure."</p>
+</div>
+</div>
+<p>He, therefore, tells us, at the close, that his labours are
+refreshed by the sweet thoughts of her; that, in fact, his toil is
+no toil, and that when he is "most busy" he "least does it," and
+suffers least under it. The delight he takes in his "mean task"
+renders it none.</p>
+<p>Such I take to be the clear meaning of the poet, though somewhat
+obscurely and paradoxically expressed&mdash;</p>
+<div class="poem">
+<div class="stanza">
+<p>"Most busy, least when I do it;"</p>
+</div>
+</div>
+<p>and when Theobald proposed to substitute</p>
+<div class="poem">
+<div class="stanza">
+<p>"Most busy-less when I do it,"</p>
+</div>
+</div>
+<p>he saw, though perhaps not quite distinctly, that such was the
+poet's intention, only, as I have said above, he arrived at it by
+altering, and I by adhering to, the poet's language. I may be
+allowed to add that I came to my conclusion many years before I was
+asked to put my name to an edition of Shakspeare, which interrupted
+one of the most valuable friendships I ever formed.</p>
+<p>MR. SINGER will see at once that my interpretation (which I
+consider quite consistent with the character of Shakspeare's mind,
+as well as quite consistent with the expressions he has used
+throughout the speech of the hero), steers clear of his proposal to
+alter "busie lest," or "busie least," of the folios of 1623 and
+1632, to <i>busyest</i> or <i>busiest</i>; although everybody at
+all acquainted with our old language will agree with him in
+thinking, that if Shakspeare had used "busiest" at all, which he
+does not in any of his productions, he might have said <i>most
+busiest</i> without a violation of the constant practice of his
+day.</p>
+<p class="author">J. PAYNE COLLIER.</p>
+<p>September 24. 1850.</p>
+<hr />
+<h3>GRAY'S ELEGY.</h3>
+<p>Perhaps the HERMIT of HOLYPORT will be satisfied with proofs
+from GRAY himself as to the time and manner of the first appearance
+of the <i>Elegy</i>.</p>
+<p>GRAY thus writes to Dr. Wharton, under the date of "Dec. 17,
+1750." [I quote Mason's "Life" of its Author, p. 216.]</p>
+<blockquote>
+<p>"The stanzas" [which he afterwards called <i>Elegy</i> at the
+suggestion of Mason] "which I now enclose to you have had the
+misfortune, by <i>Mr.</i> [Horace] <i>Walpole's fault</i>, to be
+made still more public," &amp;c.</p>
+</blockquote>
+<p>The next letter in Mason's publication is a letter from "Mr.
+Gray to Mr. Walpole" (p. 217.), and is dated "<i>Cambridge,
+Feb.</i> 11, 1751," which runs thus:&mdash;</p>
+<blockquote>
+<p>"As you have brought me into a little sort of distress, you must
+assist me, I believe, to get out of it as well as I can. Yesterday
+I had the misfortune of receiving a letter from certain gentlemen
+(as their bookseller expresses it) who have taken the Magazine of
+Magazines into their hands: they tell me that an <span class=
+"pagenum"><a name="page301" id="page301"></a>{301}</span>
+<i>ingenious</i> poem, called 'Reflections in a Country
+Church-yard,' has been communicated to them, which they are
+printing forthwith; that they are informed that the
+<i>excellent</i> author of it is I by name, and that they beg not
+only his <i>indulgence</i>, but the <i>honour</i> of his
+correspondence, &amp;c.... I therefore am obliged to desire you
+would make Dodsley print it immediately <i>from your copy</i>, but
+without my name, &amp;c. He must correct the press himself ... and
+the title must be 'Elegy written in a Country Church-yard.' If he
+would add a line or two to say it came into his hand by accident, I
+should like it better ... If Dodsley do not do this immediately, he
+may as well let it alone."</p>
+</blockquote>
+<p>Dr. Johnson (<i>Life of Gray</i>) says:</p>
+<blockquote>
+<p>"His next production, 1750, was his far-famed <i>Elegy</i>,"
+&amp;c.</p>
+</blockquote>
+<p>The Doctor adds:</p>
+<blockquote>
+<p>"Several of his [Gray's] pieces were published, 1753, with
+designs by Mr. Bentley, and that they might in some form or other
+make a book, only one side of each leaf was printed. I believe the
+poems and the plates recommended each other so well, that the whole
+impression was soon bought."</p>
+</blockquote>
+<p>It contains <i>six</i> poems, one being the <i>Elegy</i>. I have
+before me a copy of this collection, which is folio. The plates are
+clever, and very curious; a copy was sold at the Fonthill sale for
+3<i>l.</i> 4<i>s.</i>! The copy, admirably bound, which I quote,
+was bought at a bookseller's front-window stall for 4<i>s.</i> The
+title of this collection is "<i>Designs by Mr.</i> R. BENTLEY,
+<i>for six poems by Mr.</i> J. GRAY."</p>
+<p>According to the title-page, it was "printed for R. DODSLEY, in
+Pall Mall, MDCCLIII.," two years previously to the date to which
+your correspondent refers. This (1753) collection gives the
+line,&mdash;</p>
+<div class="poem">
+<div class="stanza">
+<p>"Save where the beetle wheels his <i>droning</i> flight."</p>
+</div>
+</div>
+<p>In the <i>Elegant Extracts</i> (verse), ed. 1805, which, it must
+be needless to mention, was prepared by the able and indefatigable
+Dr. Vicesimus Knox, the accomplished scholar gives the
+line&mdash;</p>
+<div class="poem">
+<div class="stanza">
+<p>"Save where the beetle wheels his <i>drony</i> flight."</p>
+</div>
+</div>
+<p>Dr. Johnson's <i>Dictionary</i> does not insert the word
+"droning" or "drony;" but among his Illustrations attached to the
+verb "to drone," there are two from Dryden, each, it may be seen,
+using the word "droning." There is no quotation containing the word
+"drony." Gray's language is:</p>
+<div class="poem">
+<div class="stanza">
+<p>"Save where the beetle wheels his <i>droning</i> flight,</p>
+<p>And drowsy <i>tinklings</i> lull the distant folds."</p>
+</div>
+</div>
+<p>Johnson's second quotation from Dryden may be worth repeating,
+as showing that Gray's language is not wholly different from his
+predecessor's:&mdash;</p>
+<div class="poem">
+<div class="stanza">
+<p class="i8">"Melfoil and honeysuckles pound,</p>
+<p>With these alluring savours strew the ground,</p>
+<p>And mix with <i>tinkling</i> brass the cymbal's <i>droning</i>
+sound."</p>
+</div>
+</div>
+<p>It is perhaps hardly worth noticing, that there is not
+uniformity even in the title. Johnson calls it, <i>Elegy in the
+Church-yard</i>; Dodsley (1753) styles it, <i>Elegy written in a
+Country Church-yard</i>.</p>
+<p class="author">A HERMIT AT HAMPSTEAD.</p>
+<p><i>Gray's Elegy</i> (Vol. ii., p. 264.).&mdash;The HERMIT OF
+HOLYPORT is referred to the 4to. edit. of the <i>Works of Gray</i>,
+by Thos. Jas. Mathias, in which, vol. i. at the end of the Elegy,
+in print, he will find "From the original in the handwriting of
+Thos. Gray:</p>
+<div class="poem">
+<div class="stanza">
+<p>"'Save where the beetle wheels his <i>droning</i> flight.'"</p>
+</div>
+</div>
+<p>From the autograph the Elegy appears to have been written in
+1750; and the margin states, published in Feb. 1751, by Dodsley,
+and went through four editions in two months; and afterwards a
+fifth, sixth, seventh and eighth, ninth and tenth, and eleventh;
+printed also in 1753, with Mr. Bentley's designs, of which there is
+a second edition; and again by Dodsley in his <i>Miscellany</i>,
+vol. iv.; and in a Scotch collection, called the <i>Union</i>.
+Translated into Latin by Chr. Anstey, Esq., and the Rev. Mr.
+Roberts, and published in 1762; and again in the same year by Rob.
+Lloyd, M.A. The original MS. of the above will be found among the
+MSS. of Thos. Gray, in the possession of the Masters and Fellows of
+Pembroke House, Cambridge.</p>
+<p class="author">W.S.</p>
+<p>Richmond, Sept 21. 1850</p>
+<hr />
+<h3>BISHOPS AND THEIR PRECEDENCE.</h3>
+<h4>(Vol. ii., p. 254.)</h4>
+<p>Arun is not right, in reference to this Query, in saying that
+the precedence of bishops over the temporal barons is regulated by
+the statute of 31 Hen. VIII. The precedence of bishops over the
+temporal lords is not regulated by the Act of 31 Hen. VIII. for
+placing the lords. They may have originally been summoned to sit in
+parliament in right of their succession to certain baronial lands
+annexed to, or supposed to be annexed to their episcopal sees; but
+as some of the temporal peers were also summoned in right of lands
+held of the king <i>per baroniam</i>, that is not a satisfactory
+reason why they should take precedence of temporal barons.</p>
+<p>The precedency must have been regulated by some other laws,
+rules, or usage than are presented by the Act of 31 Hen. VIII. The
+Archbishop of Canterbury precedes the Lord Chancellor; the
+Archbishop of York the Lord President of the Council and the Lord
+Privy Seal; and all bishops precede barons. This precedency,
+however, is not given by the <i>statute</i>. The Act provides only,
+in reference to the spiritual peers, that the Vicegerent for good
+and due ministration of justice, to be had in all causes and cases
+touching the ecclesiastical jurisdiction, and for the godly
+reformation and redress of all errors, heresies, and abuses in the
+<span class="pagenum"><a name="page302" id=
+"page302"></a>{302}</span> Church (and all other persons having
+grant of the said office), shall sit and be placed in all
+parliaments on the <i>right side</i> of the parliament chamber, and
+upon the same form that the Archbishop of Canterbury sitteth on,
+and above the same archbishop and his successors; and next to the
+said Vicegerent shall sit the Archbishop of Canterbury; and then,
+next to him, on the same form and side, shall sit the Archbishop of
+York; and next to him, on the same form and side, the Bishop of
+London; and next to him, on the same side and form, the Bishop of
+Durham; and next to him, on the same side and form, the Bishop of
+Winchester; and then all the other bishops of both provinces of
+Canterbury and York shall sit and be placed on the same side, after
+their ancienties, as it hath been accustomed.</p>
+<p>There is nothing here to show in what order they are to rank
+among the great officers, or other temporal peers; nor is the
+precedency given to the Lord Chancellor over the Archbishop of
+York.</p>
+<p>By the Act of Union of Great Britain and Ireland, the
+archbishops of that kingdom have rank immediately after the
+Archbishop of York, and therefore before the great officers
+(excepting only the Lord Chancellor), as well as above dukes; and
+the Irish bishops immediately after those of England.</p>
+<p>It may be rightly stated that the high spiritual rank of the
+bishops is a reason for giving them precedence over the temporal
+lords sitting as barons; but has that <i>reason</i> been assigned
+by any writer of authority, or even any writer upon
+precedence?&mdash;the Query suggested by E. (Vol. ii., p. 9.) Lord
+Coke does not assign that reason, but says, because they hold their
+bishopricks of the king <i>per baroniam</i>. But the holding <i>per
+baroniam</i>, as before observed, would equally apply to the
+temporal lords holding lands by similar tenures, and sitting by
+writ, and receiving summons in ancient times in virtue of such
+their tenure.</p>
+<p>The precedence of bishops over barons was clearly
+<i>disputed</i> in the reign of King Henry VI., when Baker says in
+his <i>Chronicle</i> (p. 204.), <i>judgment</i> was given for the
+<i>lords temporal</i>; but where the judgment, or any account of
+the dispute for precedence, is to be found I cannot say. That is
+what your correspondent G. inquired for (Vol. ii., p. 76.).</p>
+<p class="author">C.G.</p>
+<p>Your correspondent ARUN (Vol. ii., p. 254.) states, on the
+authority of Stephen's <i>Blackstone</i>, that&mdash;</p>
+<blockquote>
+<p>"Bishops are temporal barons, and sit in the House of Peers in
+right of succession to certain ancient baronies annexed or supposed
+to be annexed to their episcopal lands."</p>
+</blockquote>
+<p>This position, though supported by Lord Coke in more places than
+one (see <i>Coke upon Littleton</i>, 134. <i>a, b</i>; 3
+<i>Inst.</i> 30.; 4 <i>Inst.</i> 44.), and adopted by most other
+legal text-writers on his authority, cannot, it is conceived, be
+supported. It seems to be clearly ascertained that bishops sat in
+the great councils of this and other kingdoms not <i>ratione
+baroniarum</i> but <i>jure ecclesiarum</i>, by custom, long before
+the tenure <i>per baroniam</i> was known. In the preambles to the
+laws of Ina (Wilkins' <i>Leges Ang.-Sax.</i> f. 14.), of Athelstan
+(<i>ib.</i> 54.), of Edmund (<i>ib.</i> 72.), the bishops are
+mentioned along with others of the great council, whilst the tenure
+<i>per baroniam</i> was not known until after the Conquest. The
+truth seems to be that</p>
+<blockquote>
+<p>"The bishops of the Conqueror's age were entitled to sit in his
+councils by the general custom of Europe and by the common law of
+England, which the conquest did not overturn."&mdash;Hallam's
+<i>Mid. Ag.</i> 137-8, 9th ed.</p>
+</blockquote>
+<p>Can any of your readers throw any light on the much disputed
+tenure <i>per baroniam</i>? What was its essential character, what
+its incidents, and in what way did it differ from the ordinary
+tenure <i>in capite</i>?</p>
+<p class="author">BARO.</p>
+<hr />
+<h3>REPLIES TO MINOR QUERIES.</h3>
+<p><i>Leicester and the reputed Poisoners of his Time</i> (Vol.
+ii., pp. 9. 92.).&mdash;This subject receives interesting
+illustration in the <i>Memoirs of Gervas Holles</i>, who at some
+length describes the seduction of the Lady Sheffield, by Leicester,
+at Belvoir Castle, while attending the Queen on her Progress. A
+letter from the Earl to the lady of his love, contained the
+suspicious intimation&mdash;</p>
+<blockquote>
+<p>"<i>That he had not been unmindful in removing that obstacle</i>
+which hindered the full fruition of their contentments; that he had
+endeavoured one expedient already which had failed, but he would
+lay another which he doubted not would hit more sure."</p>
+</blockquote>
+<p>This letter the Lady Sheffield accidentally dropped from her
+pocket; and being picked up and given to the Lord Sheffield by his
+sister Holles, he read it with anger and amazement. That night he
+parted beds, and the next day houses; meditating in what manner he
+might take honourable and just revenge. Having resolved, he posted
+up to London to effect it; but the discovery had preceded him to
+the knowledge of Leicester, who finding a necessity to be quick,
+bribed an Italian physician ("whose name," says Holles, "I have
+forgotten") in whom Lord Sheffield had great confidence, to poison
+him, which was immediately effected after his arrival in London.
+Leicester, after cohabiting with the Lady Sheffield for some time,
+married the widow of the Earl of Essex, who, it is thought, says
+Holles, "<i>served him in his own kind, every way</i>."</p>
+<p>In the suit afterwards instituted by Sir Robert Dudley, with the
+view of establishing his legitimacy, the Lady Sheffield was
+examined, and swore <span class="pagenum"><a name="page303" id=
+"page303"></a>{303}</span> to a private marriage with the Earl of
+Leicester, but that she had been prevailed on, by threats and
+pecuniary largesses, to deny the marriage, as Queen Elizabeth was
+desirous that Lord Leicester should marry the widow of the Earl of
+Essex.</p>
+<p>One curious circumstance arises out of the revival of these dark
+doings. Are the particular drugs employed by Leicester's Italian
+physician "in removing obstacles" now known and in operation? By a
+remarkable coincidence, in a case of supposed poisoning at
+Cheltenham, some time since, the intended victim escaped with the
+loss of his hair and his nails.</p>
+<p class="author">H.K.S.C.</p>
+<p><i>What is the correct Prefix of Mayors?</i> (Vol. i., p.
+380.)&mdash;In Leicester the usage has always been to designate the
+chief magistrate "The worshipful the Mayor," which, I believe, is
+the style used in <i>boroughs</i>. In <i>cities</i>, and places
+<i>specially privileged</i>, "Right worshipful" are the terms
+employed.</p>
+<p class="author">JAYTEE.</p>
+<p><i>Marks of Cadency</i> (Vol. ii., p. 248.).&mdash;The label of
+the Prince of Wales has, from the time of Edward III. up to the
+present time, been of three points argent, and <i>not</i>
+charged.</p>
+<p class="author">F.E.</p>
+<hr class="full" />
+<h2>MISCELLANEOUS.</h2>
+<h3>NOTES ON BOOKS, SALES, CATALOGUES, ETC.</h3>
+<p>Although we do not usually record in our columns the losses
+which literature sustains from time to time, we cannot permit the
+death of Thomas Amyot, the learned Director of the Camden Society,
+and for so many years the Treasurer of the Society of Antiquaries,
+to pass without rendering our grateful tribute to the memory of one
+of the most intelligent and kindest-hearted men that ever breathed;
+from whom we, in common with so many others, when entering on our
+literary career, received the most friendly assistance, and the
+most encouraging sympathy.</p>
+<p>Every fifty years commences a discussion of the great question
+when the current century, or half century, properly begins. We have
+just seen this in the numerous Queries, Answers, Replies, and
+Rejoinders upon the subject which have appeared in the columns of
+the daily and weekly press; the only regular treatise being the
+essay upon <i>Ancient and Modern Usage in Reckoning</i>, by
+professor De Morgan, in the <i>Companion to the Almanack</i> for
+the present year. This Essay is opposed to the idea of a "zero
+year," and one of the advocates of that system of computation has,
+therefore, undertaken a defence of the zero principle, which he
+pronounces, "when properly understood, is undoubtedly the most
+correct basis of reckoning," in a small volume entitled, <i>An
+Examination of the Century Question</i>, and in which he maintains
+the point for which he is contending with considerable learning and
+ingenuity. All who are interested in the question at issue, will be
+at once amused and instructed by it.</p>
+<p>Mr. Charles Knight announces a new edition of his <i>Pictorial
+Shakespeare</i> under the title of the National Edition; to contain
+the whole of the Notes, Illustrations, &amp;c., thoroughly revised;
+and which, while it will be printed in a clear and beautiful type
+across the page, and not in double columns, will have the advantage
+of being much cheaper than the edition which he originally put
+forth.</p>
+<p><i>The Declaration of the Fathers of the Councell of Trent
+concerning the going into Churches at such Times as Hereticall
+Service is said or Heresy preached, &amp;c.</i>, is a reprint of a
+very rare tract, which possesses some present interest, as it bears
+upon the statement which has been of late years much insisted on by
+Mr. Perceval and other Anglican controversialists, that for the
+first twelve years of Elizabeth's reign, and until Pius V.'s
+celebrated Bull, <i>Regnans in Excelsis</i>, the Roman Catholics of
+England were in the habit of frequenting the Reformed worship.</p>
+<p>We have received the following Catalogues:&mdash;W.S. Lincoln's
+(Cheltenham House, Westminster Road) Sixty-first Catalogue of
+English and Foreign Second-hand Books; W.D. Reeve's (98. Chancery
+Lane) Catalogue No. 13. of Cheap Books, many Rare and Curious; R.
+Kimpton's (31. Wardour Street, Soho) Catalogue No. 29. of
+Second-hand Books in good Condition at very reduced Prices.</p>
+<hr />
+<h3>BOOKS AND ODD VOLUMES</h3>
+<h4>WANTED TO PURCHASE.</h4>
+<p>CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY POLL-BOOKS FOR 1780, 1784, 1790, and
+1829.</p>
+<p>OXFORD UNIVERSITY POLL-BOOKS for 1750, 1768, 1806.</p>
+<p>BEN JONSON by CLIFFORD. 8vo. Vols. II., III., and IV.</p>
+<p>Letters, stating particulars and lowest price, <i>carriage
+free</i>, to be sent to Mr. BELL, Publisher of "NOTES AND QUERIES,"
+186. Fleet Street.</p>
+<hr />
+<h3>NOTICES TO CORRESPONDENTS.</h3>
+<p>VOLUME THE FIRST OF NOTES AND QUERIES, <i>with Title-page and
+very copious Index, is now ready, price 9s. 6d., bound in cloth,
+and may be had, by order, of all Booksellers and Newsmen.</i></p>
+<p><i>We are unavoidably compelled to postpone numerous NOTES,
+QUERIES, AND REPLIES: indeed we see no way of clearing off our
+accumulation of REPLIES without the publication of an extra Number,
+to be devoted exclusively to the numerous Answers which we now have
+waiting for insertion.</i></p>
+<p>GUTCH'S Literary and Scientific Regsiter and Almanack,
+<i>advertised in our last No., is for</i> 1851 <i>not</i> 1850.</p>
+<p>Mr. G.B. RICHARDSON <i>would oblige us by forwarding the
+additional verses of</i> "Long Lonkin" <i>for our correspondent</i>
+SELEUCUS.</p>
+<p>A CONSTANT SUBSCRIBER <i>will find the line</i>,</p>
+<div class="poem">
+<div class="stanza">
+<p>"Music hath charms to soothe the savage breast,"</p>
+</div>
+</div>
+<p><i>in Congreve's</i> Mourning Bride.</p>
+<p>JANUS DOUSA. <i>In our next No.</i></p>
+<p>MEDICUS, <i>who inquires respecting the origin of the proverbial
+saying, "Quem Deus vult perdere," is referred to our First
+Volume</i>, pp. 347. 351. 421. and 476. <i>The original line reads
+"Quem Jupiter vult," and is Barnes' translation of a fragment
+of</i> Euripides. <span class="pagenum"><a name="page304" id=
+"page304"></a>{304}</span></p>
+<hr class="adverts" />
+<p>THE QUARTERLY REVIEW, No. CLXXIV., is published THIS DAY.</p>
+<blockquote>
+<p>CONTENTS:<br />
+I. TICKNOR'S HISTORY OF SPANISH LITERATURE.<br />
+II. CHURCH AND EDUCATION IN WALES.<br />
+III. FORMS OF SALUTATION.<br />
+IV. SIBERIA AND CALIFORNIA.<br />
+V. MURE ON THE LITERATURE OF GREECE.<br />
+VI. METROPOLITAN WATER SUPPLY.<br />
+VII. ANECDOTES OF THE PROVISIONAL GOVERNMENT.<br />
+VIII. COCHRANES'S YOUNG ITALY.<br />
+IX. LAST DAY OF LOUIS-PHILIPPE.</p>
+<p>JOHN MURRAY, Albemarle Street.</p>
+</blockquote>
+<hr />
+<p>Will be published on the 1st of November, 1850, with the other
+Almanacks,</p>
+<p>THE LITERARY AND SCIENTIFIC REGISTER AND ALMANACK for 1851.
+Price 3<i>s.</i> 6<i>d.</i></p>
+<p>Dedicated by especial permission to H.R.H. Prince Albert, by
+J.W.G. GUTCH, M.R.C.S.L., F.L.S.;</p>
+<p>Containing a condensed mass of scientific and useful information
+alike valuable to the student and man of science.</p>
+<p>Tenth Yearly issue.</p>
+<p>Published by D. BOGUE, Fleet Street, London</p>
+<hr />
+<p>Shortly will be Published.</p>
+<p>THE ARCHITECTURAL QUARTERLY REVIEW. A Literary Periodical
+devoted to Works appertaining to the Art and Science of
+Architecture. Prospectuses may be obtained from the Publisher.
+Letters for the Editor, and books, drawings, models, and specimens,
+to be addressed to the care of the Publisher.</p>
+<p>GEORGE BELL, 186. Fleet Street.</p>
+<hr />
+<p>Royal 4to., cloth, price 2<i>l.</i> 2<i>s.</i></p>
+<p>EXAMPLES OF ANCIENT PULPITS EXISTING IN ENGLAND. Selected and
+drawn from Sketches and Measurements taken on the Spot, with
+Descriptive Letterpress. By FRANCIS T. DOLLMAN, Architect.</p>
+<p>This Work contains thirty quarto Plates, three of which are
+highly finished in Colours, restored accurately from the existing
+indications. The Pulpits delineated are St. Westburga, Chester: SS.
+Peter and Paul, Shrewsbury; St. Michael, Coventry; St. Mary,
+Wendon; St. Mary and All Saints, Fotheringay; All Saints, North
+Cerney; Holy Trinity, Nallsea; St. Peter Winchcombe; St. John
+Baptist, Cirencester; St. Mary, Totness; St. Mary, Frampton. Holy
+Trinity, Old Aston; St. Benedict, Glastonbury; St. Peter,
+Wolverhampton: St. Andrew, Cheddar (coloured); St. Andrew, Banwell;
+St. George, Brakworth; Holy Trinity, Long Sutton (coloured); St.
+Saviour, Dartmouth (coloured); All Saints, Sudbury; All Saints,
+Hawstead; St. Mary de Lode, Gloucester; St. Mary, North
+Petherton.</p>
+<p>GEORGE BELL, 186. Fleet Street.</p>
+<hr />
+<p>To be completed in Four Parts, Parts I. and II., price
+5<i>s.</i> each plain; 7<i>s.</i> 6<i>d.</i> coloured.</p>
+<p>ANTIQUARIAN GLEANINGS IN THE NORTH OF ENGLAND: being Examples of
+Antique Furniture, Plate, Church Decoration, Objects of Historical
+Interest, &amp;c. Drawn and etched by W.B. SCOTT.</p>
+<p>"A collection of antiquarian relics, chiefly in the decorative
+branch of art, preserved in the northern counties, portrayed by a
+very competent hand ... All are drawn with that distinctness which
+makes them available for the antiquarian, for the artist who is
+studying costume, and for the study of decorative
+art."&mdash;<i>Spectator.</i></p>
+<p>Parts III. and IV., completing the Work, are in preparation, and
+will be published shortly.</p>
+<p>GEORGE BELL, 186. Fleet Street.</p>
+<hr />
+<blockquote>
+<p>THE EDINBURGH REVIEW, No CLXXXVIII., will be publishd on
+THURSDAY, October 10th, 1850.</p>
+<p class="i2">I. HISTORY OF THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE.<br />
+II. THE UNITED STATES.<br />
+III. BRITISH MUSEUM: CATALOGUE OF PRINTED BOOKS.<br />
+IV. MURE'S CRITICAL HISTORY OF THE LANGUAGE<br />
+AND LITERATURE OF ANTIENT GREECE.<br />
+V. COL. CHESNEY'S EXPEDITION TO THE EUPHRATES AND TIGRIS.<br />
+VI. RECENT CLASSICAL ROMANCES.<br />
+VIII. DIFFICULTIES OF REPLUBLICAN FRANCE.<br />
+IX. HORACE AND TASSO.</p>
+<p>London: LONGMAN AND CO. Edinburgh: A. and C. BLACK.</p>
+</blockquote>
+<hr />
+<p>MR. L.A. LEWIS'S SALES for OCTOBER, 1850, FRIDAY 11TH., and
+SATURDAY 12th. Valuable Books, Architechural Books, Books of
+Prints, &amp;c., from the West of England, including Stuart and
+Revett's Antiquities of Athens, 4 vols.; unedited Antiuities of
+Attica; Piranesi Campus Martius Antiqua Orbis; Houghton Gallery, 2
+vols; Bowyer's Hume's England; Rogers' Collection of Prints, 2
+vols.; Knorr, Delici&aelig; Natur&aelig; Select&aelig;, 2 vols.;
+Tableaux Historiques de la R&eacute;volution Fran&ccedil;aise, 2
+vols.; Stow's London, by Strype, 2 vols.; Domesday Book, 2 vols.;
+Edmondson's Heraldry, 2 vols.; Illustrated London News, 11 vols.;
+Encyclop&aelig;dia Metropolitana, 29 vols.; Neale's Gentlemen's
+Seats, 6 vols.; Loddiges' Botanical Cabinet, 10 vols., large paper;
+Maund's Botanic Garden, 9 vols.; Sweet's Geraniums, 5 vols.;
+Beauties of England and Wales, 32 vols.; Hogarth's Works, 3 vols.,
+red morocco; Knight's London, 6 vols.; Retrospective Review, 14
+vols.; Bayle, Dictionnaire Historique, 16 vols.; Lodge's
+Illustrious Portraits, 10 vols.; Knight's Pictorial Bible, 3 vols.;
+Clarke's Commentary on the Bible, 6 vols.; a few Pictures and
+Prints, &amp;c.</p>
+<p>FRIDAY, 18TH, AND SATURDAY, 19TH.&mdash;Books, including the
+stock of the late Mr. C. Whiten.</p>
+<p>FRIDAY, 25TH,&mdash;Pictures, Prints, Books, Stereotype Plates,
+Copyrights, Books in Quires, &amp;c.</p>
+<p>Mr. C.A. Lewis will have Sales on each Friday in November and
+December.</p>
+<p>125. Fleet Street.</p>
+<hr />
+<p>Just published, Part 9, price 9<i>s.</i>, plain; Tinted, small
+paper, 10<i>s.</i> 6<i>d.</i>; Proof, large paper, 12<i>s.</i></p>
+<p>THE CHURCHES OF THE MIDDLE AGES: or, Select Specimens of Early
+and Middle Pointed Structures; with a few of the pures; Late
+Pointed Examples, Illustrated by Geometric and Perspective
+Drawings. By HENRY BOWMAN and J.S. CROWTHER, Architects. Containing
+Illustrations of St. Peter's Church, Thrukingham, Norfolk; St.
+John's, Cley, Norfolk; and St. Andrew's, Heckington,
+Lincolnshire.</p>
+<p>To be completed in Twenty Parts, each containing Six Plates,
+Imperial folio. Issued at intervals of two months.</p>
+<p>"Ewerby is a magnficent specimen of a Flowing Middle-Pointed
+Church. it is most perfectly measured and described: one can follow
+the most rcondite beauties of the construction, mouldings and
+joints, in these Plates, almost as well as in the original
+structure. Such a monograph as this will be of incalculable value
+to the architects of our Colonies or the United States, who have no
+means of access to ancient churches. The Plates are on stone, done
+with remarkable skill and distinctness. Of Heckington we can only
+say that the perspective view from the south-east presents a very
+vision of beauty; we can hardle conceive anything more perfect. We
+heartlily recommend this series to all who are able to patronize
+it."&mdash;<i>Ecclesiologist</i>, Oct. 1849.</p>
+<p>"This, if completed in a similar manner to the Parts now out,
+will be a beautiful and valuable work. The perspective of St.
+Andrew's, Heckington, is a charming specimen of lithography, by
+Hawkins. We unhesitatingly recommend Messrs. Bowman and Crowther's
+work to our readers, as likely to be useful to
+them."&mdash;<i>Builder</i>.</p>
+<p>London: GEORGE BELL, 186. Fleet Street.</p>
+<hr />
+<p>Printed by THOMAS CLARK SHAW, of No. 8. New Street Square, at
+No. 5. New Street Square, in the Parish of St. Bride in the City of
+London; and published by GEORGE BELL, of No. 186. Fleet Street, in
+the Parish of St. Dunstan in the West, in the City of London,
+Publisher, at No. 186. Fleet Street aforesaid.&mdash;Saturday,
+October 5. 1850.</p>
+<hr class="full" />
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+<pre>
+
+
+
+
+
+End of the Project Gutenberg EBook of Notes and Queries, Number 49,
+Saturday, Oct. 5, 1850, by Various
+
+*** END OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK NOTES AND QUERIES ***
+
+***** This file should be named 13480-h.htm or 13480-h.zip *****
+This and all associated files of various formats will be found in:
+ https://www.gutenberg.org/1/3/4/8/13480/
+
+Produced by The Internet Library of Early Journals, Jon Ingram, David
+King, and the Online Distributed Proofreading Team.
+
+
+Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions
+will be renamed.
+
+Creating the works from public domain print editions means that no
+one owns a United States copyright in these works, so the Foundation
+(and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United States without
+permission and without paying copyright royalties. Special rules,
+set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license, apply to
+copying and distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works to
+protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm concept and trademark. Project
+Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if you
+charge for the eBooks, unless you receive specific permission. If you
+do not charge anything for copies of this eBook, complying with the
+rules is very easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose
+such as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and
+research. They may be modified and printed and given away--you may do
+practically ANYTHING with public domain eBooks. Redistribution is
+subject to the trademark license, especially commercial
+redistribution.
+
+
+
+*** START: FULL LICENSE ***
+
+THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE
+PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK
+
+To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free
+distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work
+(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project
+Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full Project
+Gutenberg-tm License (available with this file or online at
+https://gutenberg.org/license).
+
+
+Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic works
+
+1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to
+and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property
+(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all
+the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or destroy
+all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your possession.
+If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the
+terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or
+entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8.
+
+1.B. "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark. It may only be
+used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who
+agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few
+things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works
+even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See
+paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement
+and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
+works. See paragraph 1.E below.
+
+1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the Foundation"
+or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection of Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic works. Nearly all the individual works in the
+collection are in the public domain in the United States. If an
+individual work is in the public domain in the United States and you are
+located in the United States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from
+copying, distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative
+works based on the work as long as all references to Project Gutenberg
+are removed. Of course, we hope that you will support the Project
+Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting free access to electronic works by
+freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm works in compliance with the terms of
+this agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with
+the work. You can easily comply with the terms of this agreement by
+keeping this work in the same format with its attached full Project
+Gutenberg-tm License when you share it without charge with others.
+
+1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern
+what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are in
+a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States, check
+the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this agreement
+before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, distributing or
+creating derivative works based on this work or any other Project
+Gutenberg-tm work. The Foundation makes no representations concerning
+the copyright status of any work in any country outside the United
+States.
+
+1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg:
+
+1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate
+access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear prominently
+whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work on which the
+phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the phrase "Project
+Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed, viewed,
+copied or distributed:
+
+This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with
+almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or
+re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included
+with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org
+
+1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is derived
+from the public domain (does not contain a notice indicating that it is
+posted with permission of the copyright holder), the work can be copied
+and distributed to anyone in the United States without paying any fees
+or charges. If you are redistributing or providing access to a work
+with the phrase "Project Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the
+work, you must comply either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1
+through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the
+Project Gutenberg-tm trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or
+1.E.9.
+
+1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted
+with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution
+must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any additional
+terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms will be linked
+to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works posted with the
+permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of this work.
+
+1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this
+work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm.
+
+1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this
+electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without
+prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with
+active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project
+Gutenberg-tm License.
+
+1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary,
+compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including any
+word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access to or
+distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format other than
+"Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official version
+posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm web site (www.gutenberg.org),
+you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a
+copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon
+request, of the work in its original "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other
+form. Any alternate format must include the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1.
+
+1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying,
+performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works
+unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.
+
+1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing
+access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works provided
+that
+
+- You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from
+ the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method
+ you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is
+ owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he
+ has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the
+ Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments
+ must be paid within 60 days following each date on which you
+ prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your periodic tax
+ returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked as such and
+ sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the
+ address specified in Section 4, "Information about donations to
+ the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation."
+
+- You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies
+ you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he
+ does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+ License. You must require such a user to return or
+ destroy all copies of the works possessed in a physical medium
+ and discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of
+ Project Gutenberg-tm works.
+
+- You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any
+ money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the
+ electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days
+ of receipt of the work.
+
+- You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
+ distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works.
+
+1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set
+forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from
+both the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and Michael
+Hart, the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark. Contact the
+Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below.
+
+1.F.
+
+1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable
+effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread
+public domain works in creating the Project Gutenberg-tm
+collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
+works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may contain
+"Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or
+corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual
+property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other medium, a
+computer virus, or computer codes that damage or cannot be read by
+your equipment.
+
+1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right
+of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project
+Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project
+Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all
+liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal
+fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT
+LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE
+PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH F3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE
+TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE
+LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR
+INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH
+DAMAGE.
+
+1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a
+defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can
+receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a
+written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you
+received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium with
+your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you with
+the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu of a
+refund. If you received the work electronically, the person or entity
+providing it to you may choose to give you a second opportunity to
+receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If the second copy
+is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing without further
+opportunities to fix the problem.
+
+1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth
+in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS', WITH NO OTHER
+WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO
+WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTIBILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.
+
+1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied
+warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages.
+If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the
+law of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be
+interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by
+the applicable state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any
+provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions.
+
+1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the
+trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone
+providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in accordance
+with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the production,
+promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works,
+harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees,
+that arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do
+or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg-tm
+work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or deletions to any
+Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any Defect you cause.
+
+
+Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of
+electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of computers
+including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It exists
+because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations from
+people in all walks of life.
+
+Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the
+assistance they need, is critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's
+goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will
+remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project
+Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure
+and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future generations.
+To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation
+and how your efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4
+and the Foundation web page at https://www.pglaf.org.
+
+
+Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
+Foundation
+
+The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non profit
+501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the
+state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal
+Revenue Service. The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification
+number is 64-6221541. Its 501(c)(3) letter is posted at
+https://pglaf.org/fundraising. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg
+Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent
+permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state's laws.
+
+The Foundation's principal office is located at 4557 Melan Dr. S.
+Fairbanks, AK, 99712., but its volunteers and employees are scattered
+throughout numerous locations. Its business office is located at
+809 North 1500 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887, email
+business@pglaf.org. Email contact links and up to date contact
+information can be found at the Foundation's web site and official
+page at https://pglaf.org
+
+For additional contact information:
+ Dr. Gregory B. Newby
+ Chief Executive and Director
+ gbnewby@pglaf.org
+
+Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg
+Literary Archive Foundation
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without wide
+spread public support and donations to carry out its mission of
+increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be
+freely distributed in machine readable form accessible by the widest
+array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations
+($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt
+status with the IRS.
+
+The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating
+charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United
+States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a
+considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up
+with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations
+where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To
+SEND DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any
+particular state visit https://pglaf.org
+
+While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we
+have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition
+against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who
+approach us with offers to donate.
+
+International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make
+any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from
+outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff.
+
+Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation
+methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other
+ways including including checks, online payments and credit card
+donations. To donate, please visit: https://pglaf.org/donate
+
+
+Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
+works.
+
+Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project Gutenberg-tm
+concept of a library of electronic works that could be freely shared
+with anyone. For thirty years, he produced and distributed Project
+Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer support.
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed
+editions, all of which are confirmed as Public Domain in the U.S.
+unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not necessarily
+keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper edition.
+
+Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search facility:
+
+ https://www.gutenberg.org
+
+This Web site includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm,
+including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary
+Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to
+subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks.
+
+
+
+</pre>
+
+</body>
+</html>
diff --git a/old/13480.txt b/old/13480.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..b62aa19
--- /dev/null
+++ b/old/13480.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,2323 @@
+The Project Gutenberg EBook of Notes and Queries, Number 49, Saturday,
+Oct. 5, 1850, by Various
+
+This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with
+almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or
+re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included
+with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org
+
+
+Title: Notes and Queries, Number 49, Saturday, Oct. 5, 1850
+
+Author: Various
+
+Release Date: September 16, 2004 [EBook #13480]
+
+Language: English
+
+Character set encoding: ASCII
+
+*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK NOTES AND QUERIES ***
+
+
+
+
+Produced by The Internet Library of Early Journals, Jon Ingram, David
+King, and the Online Distributed Proofreading Team.
+
+
+
+
+
+NOTES AND QUERIES:
+
+A MEDIUM OF INTER-COMMUNICATION FOR LITERARY MEN, ARTISTS, ANTIQUARIES,
+GENEALOGISTS, ETC.
+
+ * * * * *
+
+"When found, make a note of."--CAPTAIN CUTTLE.
+
+ * * * * *
+
+No. 49.] SATURDAY, OCTOBER 5, 1850 [Price Threepence. Stamped Edition 4d.
+
+ * * * * * {289}
+
+
+CONTENTS.
+
+NOTES:--Page
+ Stray Notes on Cunningham's London. 289
+ Satirical Song upon Villiers Duke of Buckingham, by Dr. Rimbault. 291
+ Baker's Notes on Author of "Whole Duty of Man," by Rev. J.E.B. Mayor. 292
+ Mistake about George Wither, by Dr. Rimbault. 293
+ Useful _v._ Useless Learning. 293
+ Minor Notes:--Numerals--Junius and Sir P. Francis--Jews under the
+ Commonwealth--"Is any thing but," &c.--Fastitocalon. 294
+
+QUERIES:--
+ Bishop Cosin's Conference. 295
+ Engleman's "Bibliotheca Scriptorum Classicorum," by Professor De
+ Morgan. 296
+ Minor Queries:--Portrait of Sir P. Sidney--Confession--Scotch
+ Prisoners at Worcester--Adamson's Edward II.--Sir Thomas
+ Moore--Dr. E. Cleaver--Gwyan's London--Coronet--Cinderella--Judas'
+ Bell--Dozen of Bread--Kings Skuggsia--Coins of
+ Gandophares--Satirical Medals. 296
+
+REPLIES:--
+ Gaudentio di Lucca. 298
+ On a Passage in the Tempest, by J. Payne Collier. 299
+ Gray's Elegy. 300
+ Bishops and their Precedence. 301
+ Replies to Minor Queries:--Leicester and the reputed Poisoners of
+ his Time--What is the correct Prefix of Mayors--Marks of Cadency. 302
+
+MISCELLANEOUS:--
+ Notes on Books, Sales, Catalogues, &c. 303
+ Books and Odd Volumes Wanted. 303
+ Notices to Correspondents. 303
+ Advertisments. 304
+
+ * * * * *
+
+
+NOTES.
+
+STRAY NOTES ON CUNNINGHAM'S LONDON.
+
+The following notes are so trivial, that I should have scrupled to send
+them on any other ground than that so well-conceived and
+labouriously-executed a work should have its most minute and unimportant
+details as correct as possible. This, in such a work, can only be
+effected by each reader pointing out the circumstances that he has
+reason to believe are not quite correctly or completely given in it.
+
+Page 24. _Astronomical Society._--The library has been recently
+augmented by the incorporation with it of the books and documents (as
+well as the members) of the _Mathematical Society of London_
+(Spitalfields). It contains the most complete collection of the English
+mathematical works of the last century known to exist. A friend, who has
+examined them with some care, specifies particularly some of the tracts
+published in the controversy raised by Bishop Berkeley respecting "the
+ghosts of departed quantities," of which he did before know the
+existence.
+
+The instruments to which Mr. Cunningham refers as bequeathed to the
+Society, are not used there, nor yet allowed to lie unused. They are
+placed in the care of active practical observers, according as the
+special character of the instruments and the special subjects to which
+each observer more immediately devotes his attention, shall render the
+assignment of the instrument expedient. The instruments, however, still
+remain the property of the Society.
+
+P. 37. _Bath House._--Date omitted.
+
+P. 143.--Evan's Hotel, Covent Garden, is described as having been once
+the residence of "James West, the great collector of books, &c., and
+_President of the Royal Society_." There has certainly never been a
+President, or even a Secretary, of that name. However, it is just
+possible that there might have been a Vice-president so named (as these
+are chosen by the President from the members of the council, and the
+council has not always been composed of men of science): but even this
+is somewhat doubtful.
+
+P. 143. _Covent Garden Theatre._--No future account of this theatre will
+be complete without the facts connected with the ill-starred Delafield;
+just as, into the Olympic, the history of the defaulter Watts, of the
+Globe Assurance Office, must also enter.
+
+P. 143. near top of col. 2. "Heigho! says Kemble."--Before this period,
+a variation of the _rigmarole_ upon which this is founded had become
+poplular, from the humour of Liston's singing at Sadler's Wells. I have
+a copy of the music and the words; altogether identical with those in
+the music. Of these, with other matters connected with the {290} amorous
+frog, I shall have something more to say hereafter. This notice is to be
+considered incidental, rather than as referring expressly to Mr.
+Cunningham's valuable book.
+
+P. 153. _Deans Yard, Westminster._--Several of the annual budgets of
+abuse, obscenity, and impudent imposture, bearing on their title-pages
+various names, but written by "John Gadbury, Student in Physic and
+Astrology," were dated from "my house, Brick Court, Dean's Yard,
+Westminster;" or this slightly varied, occasionally being, "Brick Court,
+_near_ the Dean's Yard," &c. I have not seen a complete series of
+Gadbury's _Almanacks_, but those I refer to range from 1688 to 1694
+(incomplete). His burial in St. Margaret's, Westminster, in 1704, is
+noticed by Mr. Cunningham, at p. 313. As brick was then only used in the
+more costly class of domestic buildings, this would seem to indicate
+that _prophecy_ was then a lucrative trade; and that the successor and
+pupil of the "arch-rogue, William Lilly" was quite as fortunate in his
+speculations as his master had been. It is a truth as old as society
+itself, that "knaves grow rich while honest men starve." Whilst Gadbury
+was "wallowing in plenty," the author of _Hudibras_ was perishing for
+want of a crust!
+
+P. 153. _Denzil Street._--Here, about the middle of the street, on the
+south side, lived Theophilus Holdred, a jobbing watchmaker, whose name
+will always hold a place in one department of mathematical history. He
+discovered a method of approximating to the roots of numerical
+equations, of considerable ingenuity. He, however, lost in his day and
+generation the reputation that was really due to him for it, by his
+laying claim to more than he had effected, and seeking to deprive other
+and more gifted men of the reputation due to a more perfect solution of
+the same problem. He was, indeed, brought before the public as the tool
+of a faction; and, as the tools of faction generally are, he was
+sacrificed by his own supporters when he was no longer of any use to
+them.
+
+I once called upon him, in company with Professor Leyburn, of the Royal
+Military College, but I forget whether in 1829 or 1830. We found him at
+his bench--a plain, elderly, and heavy-looking personage. He seemed to
+have become "shy" of our class, and some time and some address were
+requisite to get him to speak with any freedom: but ultimately we placed
+him at his ease, and he spoke freely. We left him with the conviction
+that he was the _bona fide_ discoverer of his own method; and that he
+had no distinct conception, even then, of the principle of the methods
+which he had been led by his friends to claim, of having _also_
+discovered _Horner's_ process before Horner himself had published it. He
+did not (ten years after the publication of Horner's method) even then
+understand it. He understood his own perfectly, and I have not the
+slightest doubt of the correctness of his own statement, of its having
+been discovered by him fifty years before.
+
+P. 166. _Dulwich Gallery._--This is amongst the unfortunate consequences
+of taking lists upon trust. Poor Tom Hurst[1] has not been in the
+churchyard these last eight years--except the three last in his grave.
+The last five years of his life were spent in a comfortable asylum, as
+"a poor brother of the Charterhouse." He was one of the victims of the
+"panic of 1825;" and though the spirit of speculation never left him, he
+always failed to recover his position. He is referred to here, however,
+to call Mr. Cunningham's attention to the necessity, in a _Hand-book_
+especially, of referring his readers correctly to the places at which
+_tickets_ are to be obtained for any purpose whatever. It discourages
+the visitor to London when he is thus "sent upon a fool's errand;" and
+the Cockney himself is not in quite so good a humour with the author for
+being sent a few steps out of his way.
+
+P. 190. _Rogers_--a Cockney by inference. I {291} should like to see
+this more decidedly established. I am aware that it is distinctly so
+stated by Chambers and by Wilkinson; but a remark once made to me by
+Mrs. Glendinning (the wife of Glendinning, the printer, of Hatton
+Garden) still leads me to press the inquiry.
+
+P. 191.--_The Free Trade Club_ was dissolved before the publication of
+this edition of the _Handbook_.
+
+P. 192.--And to Sir John Herschel, on his return from the Cape of Good
+Hope.
+
+P. 210. _Royal Society._--From a letter of Dr. Charles Hutton, in the
+_Newcastle Magazine_ (vol. i. 2nd series), it appears that at the time
+of Dr. Dodd's execution the Fellows were in the habit of adjourning,
+after the meetings, to Slaughter's Coffee House, "to eat oysters," &c.
+The celebrated John Hunter, who had attempted to resuscitate the
+ill-fated Doctor, was one of them. "The Royal Society Club" was
+instituted by Sir Joseph Banks.
+
+P. 221. _Hanover Square._--Blank date.
+
+P. 337. _Millbank Prison._--It was designed, not by "Jeremy Bentham,"
+but by his brother, the great mechanist, Sir Samuel Bentham. In passing,
+it may be remarked that the Royal Military Academy, Woolwich, is
+constructed on the same principle, and, as was stated in the _Mechanics'
+Magazine_, on authority, a year or two ago, by the same engineer.
+General rumour has, however, attributed the design to his gracious
+Majesty George III; and its being so closely in keeping with the known
+spirit of _espionage_ of that monarch certainly gave countenance to the
+rumour. It may be as well to state, however, that, so designed and so
+built, it has never yet been so used.
+
+P. 428.--_Benbow_, not a native of Wapping, but of Shrewsbury. A life of
+him was published nearly forty years ago, by that veteran of local and
+county history, Mr. Charles Hulbert, in the _Salopian Magazine_.
+
+P. 499. _Whitfield._--Certainly not the founder of the Methodists, in
+the ordinary or recognised acceptation of the term. John Wesley was at
+the head of that movement from the very first, and George Whitfield and
+Charles Wesley were altogether subordinate to him. Wesley and Whitfield
+parted company on the ground of Arminianism _versus_ Calvinism. For a
+while the two sects kept the titles of "Arminian Methodists" and
+"Calvinistic Methodists." The latter made but little ground afterwards,
+and the distinctive adjective was dropped by the Wesleyans when the
+Whitfieldites had ceased to be a prominent body.
+
+P. 515. _Doctor Dodd._--The great interest excited in favour of a
+commutation of his sentence, led to the belief at the time, that his
+life had not been really sacrificed. Many plausible stories respecting
+the Doctor having been subsequently seen alive, were current; and as
+they may possibly in some future age be revived, and again pass into
+general currency, it may be as well to state that the most positive
+evidence to the contrary exists, in a letter of Dr. Hutton's before
+referred to. The _attempt to resuscitate him was actually made_, by a no
+less distinguished surgeon than John Hunter. He seemed then to attribute
+the failure to his having _received the body too late_. Wonderful
+effects were at that time expected to result from the discovery of
+galvanism; but it would have been wonderful indeed if any restoration
+had taken place after more than two hours of suspended animation. John
+Hunter, according to the account, does not seem to have been very
+communicative on the subject, even to his philosophical friends at
+Slaughter's Oyster Rooms.
+
+T.S.D.
+
+Shooter's Hill.
+
+[Footnote 1: It may not be out of place here to mention one fine feature
+in the character of "Tom Hurst;" his deep reverence for men of ability,
+whether in literature, science, or art. Take one instance:
+
+
+Fourteen or fifteen years ago, I called one morning at his place of
+business (then 65. St. Paul's Church Yard, which has been subsequently
+absorbed into the "Religious Tract Depository"); and, as was my custom,
+I walked through the shop to his private room. He was "not in;" but a
+gentleman, who first looked at me and then at a portrait of me on the
+wall, accosted me by my surname as familiarly as an intimate
+acquaintance of twenty years would have done. He and Hurst, it appeared,
+had been speaking of me, suggested by the picture, before Hurst went
+out. The familiar stranger did not keep me long in suspense--he
+intimated that I had "probably heard our friend speak of Ben Haydon." Of
+course I had; and we soon got into an easy chat. Hurst was naturally a
+common subject with us. Amongst the remarks he made were the following,
+and in almost the words:--
+
+"When my troubles came on, I owed Hurst a large sum of money; and the
+circumstances under which I became his debtor rendered this peculiarly a
+debt of honour. He lent it me when he could ill spare it; yet he is the
+only one of all my creditors who has not in one way or other persecuted
+me to the present hour. When he first knew of my wreck, he called upon
+me--_not to reproach but to encourage me_--and he would not leave me
+till he felt sure that he had changed the moody current of my thoughts.
+If there be any change in him since then, it is in his increased
+kindness of manner and his assiduity to serve me. He is now gone out to
+try to sell 'a bit of daub' for me."
+
+Hurst came in, and this conversation dropped; but it had been well had
+Hurst been by his side on the day his last picture was opened to view at
+the Egyptian Hall. The catastrophe of that night might have been
+averted, notwithstanding Mr. Barnum and his Tom Thumb show in the
+adjoining room.]
+
+ * * * * *
+
+SATIRICAL SONG UPON GEORGE VILLIERS, DUKE OF BUCKINGHAM.
+
+In turning over some old bundles of papers of the early part of the
+seventeenth century, I met with the following satirical effusion upon
+"James's infamous prime minister," George Villiers, Duke of Buckingham.
+As an echo of the popular feelings of the people at the time it was
+written, it merits preservation; and although I have seen other
+manuscript copies of the ballad, it has never yet, as far as I can
+learn, appeared in print.
+
+It appears to be a parody or paraphrase of a well-known ballad of the
+period, the burden of which attracted the notice of the satirist. It
+afterwards became a common vehicle of derision during the civil war, as
+may be seen by turning over the pages of the collection entitled _Rump
+Songs_, and the folio volumes of the king's pamphlets.
+
+The _original_ of these parodies has hitherto eluded my researches. It
+is not among the Pepysian, Roxburghe, Wood, or Douce ballads, but
+perhaps some of your readers may be able to point it out in some public
+or private collection.
+
+ "Come heare, Lady Muses, and help mee to sing,
+ Come love mee where I lay;
+ Of a duke that deserves to be made a king--
+ The cleane contrary way,
+ O the cleane contrary way.
+
+ "Our Buckingham Duke is the man that I meane,
+ Come love mee where I lay;
+ On his shoulders the weale of the kingdome doth leane--
+ The cleane contrary way,
+ O the cleane contrary way.
+
+ "O happiest kingdome that ever was kind,
+ Come love mee where I lay;
+ And happie the king that hath such a friend--
+ The cleane contrary way,
+ O the cleane contrary way. {292}
+
+ "Needs must I extoll his worth and his blood--
+ Come love mee where I lay;
+ And his sweet disposition soe milde and soe good--
+ The cleane contrary way,
+ O the cleane contrary way.
+
+ "Those innocent smiles that embelish his face,
+ Come love mee where I lay;
+ Who sees them not tokens of goodness and grace--
+ The cleane contrary way,
+ O the cleane contrary way.
+
+ "And what other scholler could ever arise,
+ Come love mee where I lay;
+ From a master that was soe sincere and wise--
+ The cleane contrary way,
+ O the cleane contrary way.
+
+ "Who is hee could now from his grave but ascend,
+ Come love mee where I lay;
+ Would surely the truth of his service commend--
+ The cleane contrary way,
+ O the cleane contrary way.
+
+ "The king understands how he honors his place,
+ Come love me where I lay;
+ Which is to his majestie noe little grace--
+ The cleane contrary way,
+ O the cleane contrary way.
+
+ "And therefore the government justly hath hee,
+ Come love mee where I lay;
+ Of horse for the land, and shipps for the sea--
+ The cleane contrary way,
+ O the cleane contrary way.
+
+ "What, though our fleet be our enemies debtor,
+ Come love mee where I lay;
+ Wee brav'd them once, and wee'l brave them better--
+ The cleane contrary way,
+ O the cleane contrary way.
+
+ "And should they land heere they should bee disjointed,
+ Come love mee where I lay;
+ And find both our horse and men bravely appointed--
+ The cleane contrary way,
+ O the cleane contrary way.
+
+ "Then let us sing all of this nobel duke's praise,
+ Come love mee where I lay;
+ And pray for the length of his life and his daies--
+ The cleane contrary way,
+ O the cleane contrary way.
+
+ "And when that death shall close up his eyes,
+ Come love mee where I lay;
+ God take him up into the skies--
+ The cleane contrary way,
+ O the cleane contrary way."
+
+EDWARD F. RIMBAULT.
+
+ * * * * *
+
+"WHOLE DUTY OF MAN," AUTHOR OF.
+
+(From Baker's MSS, vol. xxxv. p. 469-470. Cambridge University Library.)
+
+ "Octo'r 31. 1698. Mr. Thomas Caulton, Vicar of Worksop, &c. [as
+ in the note p. xiii. to the editor's Preface, ed. 1842, with
+ unimportant variations, such as _Madam Frances Heathcote_, where
+ the printed copy has _Mrs. Heathcote_; Baker reads _Madam Ayre
+ of Rampton after dinner took_, where the printed copy has, _Mrs.
+ Eyre_. After _was dead_, follows in Baker,] and that in that
+ Month she had buried her Husband and severall Relations, but
+ that her comfort was, that by her Monthly Sacraments she
+ participated still with them in the Communion of Saints.
+
+ "Then she went to her Closet, and fetched out a Manuscript, w'ch
+ she said was the original of the _Whole Duty of Man_, tied
+ together and stitched, in 8'vo, like Sermon notes. She untied
+ it, saying, it was Dr. Fell's Correction and that the Author was
+ the Lady Packington (her Mother), in whose hand it was written.
+
+ "To prove this, the s'd Mr. Caulton further added that she said,
+ she had shewn it to Dr. Covell, Master of Christ's College[2] in
+ Cambridge, Dr. Stamford, Preb. of York, and Mr. Banks the
+ present Incumbent of the Great Church in Hull. She added,
+ withall, that _The Decay of Christian Piety_ was hers (The Lady
+ Packington's) also, but disowned any of the rest to be her
+ Mother's.
+
+ "This is a true Copy of what I wrote, from Mr. Caulton's Mouth,
+ two days before his Decease.
+
+ "Witness my hand,
+
+ "Nov. 15. 98.
+
+ "JOHN HEWYT."
+
+ "Bp. Fell tells us, that all these Tracts were written by the
+ excellent Author (whom he makes to be one and the same person)
+ at severall times, as y'e exigence of the Church, and the
+ benefit of soules directed y'r composures; and that he (the
+ Author) did likewise publish them apart, in the same order as
+ they were made. The last, it seems (w'ch is _The Lively
+ Oracles_), came out in 1678, the very year Dr. Woodhead died.
+ Had the Author liv'd longer, we should have had his Tract _Of
+ the Government of the Thoughts_, a work he had undertaken; and
+ certainly (as Bp. Fell hath told us), had this work been
+ finished, 'twould have equall'd, if not excelled, whatever that
+ inimitable hand had formerly wrote. Withall it may be observ'd,
+ that the Author of these Tracts speaks of the great Pestilence,
+ and of the great Fire of London, both w'ch happen'd after the
+ Restoration, whereas Bp. Chappell died in 1649. And further, in
+ sect. vii. of the _Lively Oracles_, n. 2., are these words, w'ch
+ I think cannot agree to Bp. Chappell [and less to Mr. Woodhead].
+ _I would not be hasty in charging Idolatry upon the Church of
+ Rome, or all in her Communion; but that their Image-Worship is a
+ most futall snare, in w'ch vast numbers of unhappy Souls are
+ taken, no Man can doubt, who hath with any Regard travailed in
+ Popish Countries: I myself, and thousands of others, whom the
+ late troubles, or other occasions, sent abroad, are, and have
+ been witnesses thereof_. {293} These words seem to have been
+ spoke by one that had been at Rome, and was forced into those
+ Countries after the troubles broke out here. But as for
+ Chappell, he never was at Rome, nor in any of those Countries.
+
+ "As for Archbp. Stern, no Man will believe him to have any just
+ Title to any of these Tracts. [The last Passage concerning
+ idolatry, will not agree with Mr. Woodhead, nor the rest with
+ Lady Packington.]
+
+ "In a letter from Mr. Hearne, dat. Oxon, Mar. 27, 1733, said by
+ Dr. Clavering, Bp. of Petr. to be wrote by one Mr. Basket, a
+ Clergyman of Worcestershire. See Dr. Hamond's _Letters_
+ published by Mr. Peck, et ultra Quaere."
+
+On so disputed a point as the authorship of the _Whole Duty of Man_,
+your readers will probably welcome any discussion by one so competent to
+form an opinion in such matters as Hearne.
+
+The letter above given was unknown to the editor of Mr. Pickering's
+edition.
+
+J.E.B. MAYOR.
+
+Marlborough College.
+
+[Footnote 2: The printed copy has _Trinity_ College.]
+
+ * * * * *
+
+MISTAKE ABOUT GEORGE WITHER.
+
+In Campbell's _Notices of the British Poets_ (edit. 1848 p. 234.) is the
+following, passage from the short memoir of George Wither:--
+
+ "He was even afraid of being put to some mechanical trade, when
+ he contrived to get to London, and with great simplicity had
+ proposed to try his fortune at court. To his astonishment,
+ however, he found that it was necessary to flatter in order to
+ be a courtier. To show his independence, he therefore wrote his
+ _Abuses Whipt and Stript_, and, instead of rising at court, was
+ committed for some months to the Marshalsea."
+
+The author adds a note to this passage, to which Mr. Peter Cunningham
+(the editor of the edition to which I refer) appends the remark inclosed
+between brackets:--
+
+ "He was imprisoned for his _Abuses Whipt and Stript_; yet this
+ could not have been his first offence, as an allusion is made to
+ a former accusation. [It was for _The Scourge_ (1615) that his
+ first known imprisonment took place.]"
+
+I cannot discover upon any authority sufficient ground for Mr.
+Campbell's note resecting a _former_ accusation against Wither. He was
+undoubtedly imprisoned for his _Abuses Whipt and Stript_, which first
+appeared in print in 1613, but I do not think an _earlier_ offence can
+be proved against him. It has been supposed, upon the authority of a
+passage in the _Warning Piece to London_, that the first edition of this
+curious work appeared in 1611; but I am inclined to think that the
+lines,--
+
+ "In sixteen hundred ten and one,
+ I notice took of public crimes,"
+
+refers to the period at which the "Satirical Essays" were _composed_.
+Mr. Willmott, however (_Lives of the Sacred Poets_, p. 72.), thinks that
+they point to an earlier publication. But it is not likely that Wither
+would so soon again have committed himself by the publication of the
+_Abuses_ in 1613, if he had suffered for his "liberty of speech" so
+shortly before.
+
+Mr. Cunningham's addition to Mr. Campbell's note is incorrect. The
+_Scourge_ is part of the _Abuses Whipt and Stript_ printed in 1613 (a
+copy of which is now before me), to which it forms a postscript. Wood,
+who had never seen it, speaks of it as a _separate_ publication; but Mr.
+Willmott has corrected this error, although he had only the means of
+referring to the edition of the _Abuses_ printed in 1615. Mr.
+Cunningham's note, that Wither was imprisoned for the _Scourge_ in 1615,
+is a mistake; made, probably, by a too hasty perusal of Mr. Willmott's
+charming little volume on our elder sacred poets.
+
+EDWARD F. RIMBAULT.
+
+ * * * * *
+
+USEFUL VERSUS USELESS LEARNING
+
+A single and practical plan for the formation of a complete and useful
+library and _respository_ of _universal_ literary knowledge.
+
+The design which I propose in the following few lines, is one which I
+should imagine nearly all the more learned and literary of your readers
+would _wish_ to see _already in existence_ and when I show that it might
+be effected _with very little trouble and expense_ (indeed _no_ trouble
+but such as would be a _pleasure_ to those interested in the work), and
+that the greatest advantage would follow from it,--I hope that it may
+meet with favourable consideration from some of the numerous, able, and
+influential readers and correspondents of your journal.
+
+I am the more induced to hope this from the fact of such a wish having
+been partially expressed by some of your contributors, and the excellent
+leading articles of Nos. 1 and 2.
+
+What I propose is simply this: the SYSTEMATIC ARRANGEMENT of _all_ the
+existing literary knowledge in the world that is considered _of value_
+by those best qualified to judge, disposed in such a manner as to answer
+these two purposes: 1st, to give a general connected and classified
+_view_ of the literary treasures of the whole world, beginning from the
+most ancient in each language and department (including only what is
+valuable in each); and, 2dly, to afford the greatest possible _facility_
+(by means of arrangement, references and _indexes_) to every inquirer
+for finding _at once_ the information he is in search of, if it is to be
+found _anywhere_ by looking for it.
+
+There are two ways in which this work might be accomplished, both of
+which were desirable, though even one only would be much better than
+none.
+
+The first and most complete is, to make a real COLLECTION of all those
+works, arranged in the {294} most perfect systematic order; and, while
+doing so, to make at the same time a corresponding classified
+_Catalogue_.
+
+The chief (and almost the only) _difficulty_ in the way of this would
+be, to find a _room_ (or suite of rooms) to contain such a library and
+repository; but such would probably be found if sought.
+
+The other way in which this object might be attained is by the formation
+of a simple CATALOGUE in the same order, such as does already exist and
+lies open for public use (though only in manuscript, and not so
+accurately classified as might be) in the noble library of the Dublin
+University.
+
+This plan would be _far easier_ than (besides forming the best possible
+_basis_ for) that so urgently advocated by MR. BOLTON CORNEY (Vol. i.
+pp. 9, 42, 43.).
+
+Of course so extensive a design would require to be distributed among
+many hundred persons; but so does any great work: while, by each
+individual undertaking that department in which he is most interested
+and most experienced, the whole might be accomplished easily and
+pleasantly.
+
+The great fault of antiquarians is, that they are constantly _beginning
+at the wrong end_: they fix on some one piece of information that they
+want to get, and devote a world of labour to hunting about in all
+directions for anything bearing on the subject; whereas the rational way
+obviously is, to have the whole existing mass of (valuable) knowledge
+_classified_, and then the inquirer would know _where_ to look for his
+purpose.
+
+Of course there will always remain much knowledge of a miscellaneous and
+irregular nature which is picked up by accident, and does not come
+within the scope of the present design; but this is generally of a
+trifling and fugitive kind, and does not at all controvert the principle
+above laid down.
+
+In conclusion, I have worked out a tolerably complete series of
+arrangements for the above design, showing its practicability as well as
+usefulness, which will be much at the service of any one who can use
+them for the furtherance of that object.
+
+W. D.
+
+ * * * * *
+
+MINOR NOTES.
+
+_Numerals._--For the old Indian forms, see Prinsep's _Journal Asiatic
+Soc. Bengal_, 1838, p. 348. The prospectus of _Brugsh, Numerorum apud
+Egyptios Demoticorum Doctrina_, Berlin, promises to give from papyri and
+inscriptions not only the figures, but the forms of operation. Probably
+the system assumed its present form by the meeting of the Indian and
+Egyptian traders at some emporium near the mouth of the Indus. Peacock
+seems to give undue weight to the fact, that the Tibetans have a copious
+nomenclature for high numbers: their arithmetic, doubtless, came with
+their alphabet, and the Buddhist legends from India.
+
+F.Q.
+
+
+_Junnius and Sir Philip Francis._--A few years ago, an aged intelligent
+person named Garner was living at Belgrave, near Leicester. I have heard
+him say that, when he was a farm bailiff to Lord Thanet, at Sevenoaks,
+in Kent, Sir Philip Francis was a frequent visitor there, and had a
+private room set apart for literary occupation. On one occasion, when he
+(Mr. Garner) was riding over the farm with Sir Philip Francis, the
+former alluded to one of the replies to Junius, by a clergyman who had
+been the subject of the "Great Unknown's" anonymous attacks, adding,
+"They say, Sir Philip, you are Junius." Sir Philip did not deny that he
+was the man, but simply smiled at the remark. This, and other
+circumstances coupled with the fact of Sir Philip's frequent visits to
+the house of so noted a politician as Lord Thanet, rendered Mr. Garner a
+firm believer in the identity of Sir Philip and Junius to the end of his
+days.
+
+JAYTEE.
+
+
+_Jews under the Commonwealth_ (Vol. i., pp. 401. 474.; vol ii., p.
+25.).--There is a confirmation of the story of the Jews being in treaty
+for St. Paul's and the Oxford Library in a passage in Carte's _Letters_,
+i. 276, April 2, 1649:--
+
+ "They are about demolishing and selling cathedral churches. I
+ hear Norwich is designed already, and that the Jews proffer
+ 600,000l. for Paul's and Oxford Library, and may have them for
+ 200,000l. more."
+
+CH.
+
+
+"_Is anything but," &c._--As your work seems adapted, amongst other
+subjects, to check the introduction into our language of undesirable
+words, phrases, and forms of speech, I would call the attention of your
+readers to the modern phrases, "is anything but," and the like, which
+have lately crept into use, and will be found, in many (otherwise)
+well-written books.
+
+I read the phrase "is anything but," for the first time, in Napier's
+_Peninsular War_; where it struck me as being so much beneath the
+dignity of historical composition, and at the same time asserting an
+impossibility, that I meditated calling the author's attention to it.
+The not unfrequent use of the same phrase by other writers, since that
+time, has by no means reconciled me to its use.
+
+In the _Edinburgh Review_ for January last (1850) I find the following
+sentence:--"But as pains have been taken to fix the blame _upon any one
+except_ the parties culpable;" and in the July number of the same
+_Review_ (p. 90.) occurs the sentence, "_any impulse rather than_ that of
+patriotism," &c.
+
+Now, a "thing," or "person," or "impulse,"--though it may not be the
+"thing," or "person," or "impulse" charged as the agent,--must yet be
+some _certain_ and _specific_ thing, or party, or impulse, {295} if
+existing as an agent at all in the matter; and cannot be "_any_ thing,"
+or "_any_ party," or "_any_ impulse," in the _indefinite_ sense intended
+in these phrases. Moreover, there seems no difficulty in expressing, in
+a simple and direct manner, that the agent was a very different, or
+opposite, or dissimilar "thing," or "person," or "impulse" from that
+supposed.
+
+I wish some persons of competent authority in the science of our
+language (and many such there are who write in your pages) would take up
+this subject, with a view to preserve the purity of it; and would also,
+for the future, exercise a watchful vigilance over the use, for the
+_first_ time, of any incorrect, or low words or phrases, in composition;
+and so endeavour to confine them to the vulgar, or to those who ape the
+vulgar in their style.
+
+P.H.F.
+
+
+_Fastitocalon._--_Fastitocalon. Cod. Exon._ fol. 96. b. p. 360. 18. read
+[Greek: Aspido ... chelonae]. Tychsen, _Physiologus Syrus_, cap. xxx.:
+did the digamma get to Crediton by way of Cricklade?
+
+F.Q.
+
+ * * * * *
+
+
+QUERIES
+
+BISHOP COSIN'S CONFERENCE.
+
+Basire in his _Dead Man's Real Speech_ (pp. 59, 60.), amongst other
+"notable instances" of Bishop Cosin's zeal and constancy in defence of
+the Church of England, mentions
+
+ "A solemn conference both by word and writing betwixt him and
+ the Prior of the English Benedictines at Paris, supposed to be
+ Robinson. The argument was concerning the validity of the
+ ordination of our priests, &c., in the Church of England. The
+ issue was, our Doctor had the better so far, that he could never
+ get from the Prior any reply to his last answer. This conference
+ was undertaken to fix a person of honour then wavering about
+ that point; the sum of which conference (as I am informed), was
+ written by Dr. Cosin to Dr. Morley, the now Right Reverend Lord
+ Bishop of Winchester, in two letters bearing date June 11, July
+ 11, 1645."
+
+The substance of this conference has been preserved among the Smith
+Manuscripts in the Bodleian Library; but it is not in the form of
+letters to Dr. Morley. Vol. xl. of this valuable collection of
+manuscripts contains (as described in Smith's table of contents):--
+
+ 1. "Papers of Bp. Cosins in defence of the Ordination of the
+ Church of England against father Prior.
+
+ "The first of these is Bp. Cosin's Review of the Father's
+ Letter, &c. [the title-page is placed at p. 77.]
+
+ "Then follows a letter (which is indeed the Bishop's first
+ paper, and should be put first) from Bishop Cosin to the Father.
+
+ "After that the Father's Answer to Bishop Cosin's Review at p.
+ 81.
+
+ "Then come two other papers about the validity of our
+ Ordination, with a preface concerning the occasion, p. 89."
+
+ 2. "Then, p. 101., A Letter from a _Rom. Cath._ to a Lady about
+ communicating in one kind,--with Bishop Cosin's Answer."
+
+ 3. "Lastly, in p. 123., is A Letter of Bp. Cosin's to Dr.
+ Collins concerning the Sabbath."
+
+The order in which the papers under the first head, about our English
+ordination, should fall, appears to be as follows:--
+
+1. There is a note attached to p. 65., evidently written by Dr. Tho.
+Smith himself in the following words:
+
+ "Transcript of several papers of Bishop Cosin's sent to me by
+ Dr. J. Smith, Prebendary of Durham.--T.S."
+
+2. At p. 77. the title-page is given thus:
+
+ "A Review of a Letter sent from F.P.R. to a Lady (whom he would
+ have persuaded to the Rom. party) in Opposition to a former
+ paper given him for the defence of the Church of England in the
+ Ordination of Priests."
+
+To this are appended the respective forms of ordering priests used in
+the Church of England and in the Roman Church.
+
+3. Then, at p. 89., we have the "occasion of this ... Discourse
+concerning the Ordination of Priests," &c. This is a kind of preface,
+which contains the first paper that was given to the Prior, dated June
+14, 1645; also another paper, bearing date July 11, 1645, but ending
+abruptly in the middle of a sentence, and having written below it
+(probably in Dr. J. Smith's hand) the following note:
+
+ "The rest of this is not yet found, and that which is written
+ thus far is not in the Bishop's own hand, but the copy is very
+ fair."
+
+However, this second paper (ending thus abruptly) appears to be no more
+than the first draft of a long letter from Cosin to the Prior, which
+commences at p. 65. of this MS., and which is dated "from the Court of
+S. Germains, July 11, 1645;" for not only does this letter bear the same
+_date_ as the before-mentioned fragment, but it begins by complaining of
+the tone of expression in a letter evidently received from the Prior
+after the draft had been prepared, but before it was sent off; and it
+concludes with the following note appended as a postscript:
+
+ "Sir,
+
+ "The enclosed (most of it) was prepared for you a fortnight
+ since; but now (upon the occasion given by your letter) you have
+ it with some advantage from
+
+ "Your servt., J.C.
+
+ "I desire the fav"
+
+ "S. Germ. July 12."
+
+4. The most important part of this MS., however, is contained in the
+long letter or treatise {296} placed first in the volume, and bearing
+for its title, "A View of F.P.'s Answer to the First Paper."
+
+This is dated from S. Germains, July 25, 1645 and would appear to be
+Cosin's last letter. But, if it be really so, Basire must, I think, be
+in error, when he says, "Our Doctor ... could never get from the Prior
+any reply to his last answer." For at p. 81. of the MS. there is a reply
+to the above "Review of a Letter sent by F.R. to a Lady," &c. which,
+though copied without either date or signature, was evidently written by
+the Prior, whilst it professes to be a reply to a treatise closely
+answering to Cosin's letter of July 25, but which letter the writer did
+not receive (as he states) before the 26th of September.
+
+I wish yet further to take notice, that Dr. Tho. Smith, in His _Vitae_
+(Lond. 1707, praef. pp. vii, viii.), refers to these manuscripts in the
+following satisfactory manner:--
+
+ "Cum, post mortem D. Cosini, de pretio et valore schedarum, quas
+ reliquit, haeredibus non satis constaret, ... auspieato tandem
+ devenit, ut favore, beneficio, et perquam insigni humanitate
+ reverendi et doctissimi viri, D. Joannis Smith, Sacrae Theologiae
+ Professoris Ecclesiae Dunelmensis Praebendarii, quorum frequens
+ hac de re commercium literarum, occasione data, (opportune
+ intercedente praenobili et reverendo, D. Georgio Whelero, equite
+ aurato, et Ecclesiae Anglicanae Presbytero, ejusdem quoque
+ Ecclesiae Cathedralis Prebendario), habui, duos libellos (tanquam
+ praetiosas tabulas ab isthoc infami naufragio servatas) a D.
+ Cosino, dum in Gallia exularet, Angliee conscriptos jam
+ possidieam: quarum unus _Vindicias Ordinatianum Ecclesieae
+ Anglicanae_ contra exceptiones et cavillationes cujusdem
+ Pontificii sacerdotis e gente nostra, alter _Responsionem ad
+ Epistolam_ nobili faeminae Anglae ab alio saccrdote _pro defensione
+ communionis sub unica specie administrandae_ inscriptam,
+ complectitur," &c.
+
+I should still be glad to add to this long note the followng Queries:--
+
+1. Can any of your readers kindly inform me whether Cosin's two letters
+to Dr. Geo. Morley are still in existence, either in MS. or in print?
+
+2. Whether there be any fuller or more authentic account of the
+controversy than that in these MS. preserved by the care of Dr. Smith?
+
+3. Whether Cosin wrote any letter to the Prior _later_ than that of July
+25?
+
+4. Who was the _lady_ the Prior wished to seduce to the Roman party?
+
+5. Is there any other account of the controversy?
+
+J. SANSOM.
+
+ * * * * *
+
+ENGELMAN'S BIBILIOTHECA SCRIPTORUM CLASSICORUM.
+
+A little while ago, I ordered Engelman's _Bibliotheca Scriptoram
+Classicorum_, purporting to contain all such works published from 1700
+to 1846. It was furnished to my bookseller by a foreign bookseller in
+_London_ with an English title, having _his own_ name on it as
+publisher, and an invitation to purchase the books described in it _from
+him_. As the paper and type were German, I objected and received in
+consequence a new English title, with the same name upon it, and a
+_shorter_ invitation to purchase from him. I was captious enough to
+object even to this; and I then received a Leipzig title in German. But
+there still remains a difficulty: for this German title has also the
+name of a _Parisian_ bookseller upon it, _a la maison duquel on peut
+s'adresser, &c._ Now, as Engelman is a bookseller, and would probably
+not object to an order out of his own catalogue, of which he is both
+author and publisher, the preceding, circumstances naturally raise the
+following Queries:
+
+1. What is the real title-page of Engelman's _Catalogue_ 2. Is the
+Parisian house accredited by Engelman; or has the former served the
+latter as the London house has Served both? 3. Is it not desirable that
+literary men should set their faces very decidedly against all and every
+the slightest alteration in the genuine description of a book? 4. Would
+it not be desirable that every such alteration should forthwith be
+communicate to your paper?
+
+The English title-page omits the important fact, that the _Catalogue_
+begins at 1700, and describes it as containing _all_ editions, &c., up
+to 1846.
+
+A. DE MORGAN.
+
+September 24. 1850.
+
+ * * * * *
+
+MINOR QUERIES.
+
+_Portrait of Sir P. Sidney, by Paul Veronese._--In the letters of Sir P.
+Sidney which I found at Hamburg, and which were published by Pickering,
+1845, it is stated that a portrait of Sidney was painted by Paul
+Veronese, at Venice, for Herbert Languet. It would be very interesting
+to discover the existence of this picture.
+
+Languet had it with him at Prague, _framed_, as he asserts, and hung up
+in his room, in the year 1575. He remarks upon it, in one place, that it
+represented Sidney as too young (he was nineteen when it was taken); in
+another place he says that it has given him too sad an expression. I
+should add, that on Languet's death, his property passed into the hands
+of his friend Du Plessis.
+
+I am led to write to you on this subject, by having observed, a few days
+since, in the collection at Blenheim, two portraits by Paul Veronese, of
+persons unknown. There may be many such, and that of Sir Philip Sidney
+may yet be identified.
+
+STEUART A. PEARS.
+
+Harrow, Sept. 6.
+
+
+_Confession._--You would much oblige if you could discover the name of a
+Catholic priest, in {297} German history, who submitted to die rather
+than reveal a secret committed to him in confession?
+
+U.J.B.
+
+
+_Scotch Prisoners at Worcester._--In Mr. Walcott's _History of St.
+Margaret's Church, Westminster_, I find the following extract from
+church wardens' accounts:--
+
+ "1652. P'd to Thos. Wright for 67 loads of soyle laid on the
+ graves in Tothill Fields, wherein 1200 Scotch prisoners, taken
+ at the fight at Worcester, were buried; and for other pains
+ taken with his teeme of horses, about mending the Sanctuary
+ Highway, when Gen. Ireton was buried."
+
+I have taken the pains to verify this extract, and find the figures
+quite correctly given. I wish to put the Query: Is this abominable
+massacre in cold blood mentioned by any of our historians? But for such
+unexceptionable evidence, it would appear incredible.
+
+C.F.S.
+
+
+_Adamson's Reign of Edward II._--
+
+ "The Reigns of King Edward II., and so far of King Edward III.,
+ as relates to the Lives and Actions of Piers Gaveston, Hugh de
+ Spencer, and Roger Lord Mortimer, with Remarks thereon adapted
+ to the present Time: Humbly addressed to all his Majesty's
+ Subjects of Great Britain, &c., by _J. Adamson_. Printed for J.
+ Millar, near the Horse Guards, 1732, and sold by the Booksellers
+ of London and Westminster, price One Shilling."
+
+The above is the title-page of a little work of eighty-six pages in my
+possession, which I am inclined to think is scarce. It appears to be a
+defence of the Walpole administration from the attacks of the
+_Craftsman_, a periodical of the time, conducted by Amhurst, who was
+supported by Bolinbroke and Pulteney, the leaders of the opposition. Is
+anything known of _J. Adamson_, the author?
+
+H.A.E.
+
+
+_Sir Thomas Moore._--Can any of your readers give any account of Sir
+Thomas Moore, beyond what Victor tells of him in his _History_ of the
+Theatre, ii. p. 144., "that he was the author of an absurd tragedy
+called _Mangora_ (played in 1717), and was knighted by George I."
+
+In Pope's "Epistle to Arbuthnot," he writes--
+
+ "Arthur, whose giddy son leglects the laws."
+
+on which Warburton notes--
+
+ "_Arthur Moore, Esq._"
+
+Who was _Arthur Moore, Esq._? and who was the "giddy son?" Was the
+latter _James Moore Smith_ a gentleman whose family name was, I think,
+_Moore_, and who assumed (perhaps for a fortune) the additional name of
+_Smith_? This gentleman Pope seems to call indiscriminately _Moore_,
+_Moor_, and _More_: and when he says that his good nature towards the
+dunces was so great that he had even "rhymed for Moor" (Ib. v. 373.), I
+cannot but suspect that the Moor _for_ whom he had _rhymed_, was the
+_giddy son_ whom _Arthur_ accused him of seducing from the law to the
+Muses. There are many allusions to this Mr. James Moore Smith throughout
+Pope's satirical works, but all very obscure; and Warburton, though he
+appears to have known him, affords no explanation as to who or what he
+was. He was the author of a comedy called _The Rival Modes_.
+
+C.
+
+
+_Dr. E. Cleaver, Bishop of Cork._--I shall feel much obliged to any of
+your correspondents who will furnish me with the particulars of the
+consecration of Dr. Euseby Cleaver to the sees of Cork and Ross, in
+March, April, or May, 1789. Finding no record of the transaction in the
+Diocesan Registry of Cork, and not being able to trace it in any other
+part of _Ireland_, I am induced to believe that this consecration may
+have taken place in _England_; and shall be very glad to be correctly
+informed upon the point.
+
+H. COTTON.
+
+Thurles, Ireland.
+
+
+_Gwynn's London and Westminster._--Mr. Thomas Frederick Hunt, in his
+_Exemplars of Tudor Architecture_, 4to. London, 1830, in a note at p.
+23., alludes to _London and Westminster improved, by John Gywnn,
+London_, 1766, 4to., and has this remark:
+
+ "It is a singular fact, that in this work John Gwynn pointed out
+ almost all the designs for the improvement of London, which have
+ been _devised_ by the civil and military architects of the
+ present day."
+
+And Mr. Hunt concludes by observing,, that--
+
+ "This discovery was made by the _Literary Gazette_."
+
+Will you permit me, through the medium of your useful publication, to
+solicit information of the number and date of the _Literary Gazette_
+which recalled public attention to this very remarkable fact?
+
+Sec.N.
+
+
+_Coronet._--In Newbold Church, in the county of Warwick, is a monument
+to the memory of Thomas Boughton of Lawford, and Elizabeth his wife,
+representing him in a suit of armour, with sword and spurs, _a coronet
+on his head_, and a bear at his feet, chained and muzzled. Query.--Can
+any of your readers give an accurate description of this coronet? Or can
+any of them mention instances of the monuments of esquires having
+similar coronets? The date of his death is not given: his wife died in
+the year 1454.
+
+Z.
+
+
+_Cinderella._--Referring to Vol. ii., p. 214., allow me to ask in what
+edition of Perrault's _Fairy Tales_ the misprint of _verre_ from _vair_
+first occurs? what is the date of their first publication, as well as
+that of the translation under the title of _Mother Goose's Tales_?
+whether Perrault was the originator of _Cinderella_, or from what source
+he drew the tale? {298} what, moreover, is the authority for identifying
+_sable_ with _vair_ for the employment of either in designating the
+highest rank of princesses?
+
+SANDVICENSIS.
+
+
+_Judas' Bell, Judas' Candle_ (Vol. i., pp. 195. 235. 357.).--Some time
+since I asked the meaning of a Judas' Bell, and your learned
+correspondent CEPHAS replied that it was only a bell so christened after
+St. Jude, the apostle. However, it may have been connected with the
+Judas' tapers, which, according, to the subjoined entries, were used
+with the Paschal candle at Easter. May I trust to his kindness to
+explain its purport?
+
+ "_Reading Parish Accompts_.
+
+ "1499. Itm. payed for making leng' Mr. Smyth's molde wt. a Judas
+ for the Pascall--vJd."
+
+ "_St. Giles' Parish Accompts_.
+
+ "A.D. 1514. Paid for making a Judas for Pascall iiijd."
+
+ "_Churchwardens' Accompts of S. Martin, Outwich_.
+
+ "1510. Paid to Randolf Merchaunt Wex Chandiler for the Pascall,
+ the tapers affore the Rode, the Cross Candelles, and Judas
+ Candelles--viiijs. iiijd."
+
+ "_St. Margaret's, Westminster._
+
+ "1524. Item payed for xij. Judacis to stand with the tapers--O
+ ijd. O"
+
+MACKENZIE WALCOTT, M.A., Oxon.
+
+
+_Dozen of Bread; Baker's Dozen._--In the _Chronicle of Queen Jane, and
+of Two Years of Queen Mary_, lately printed for the Camden Society
+(Appendix iv. p. 112.), it is stated that, amongst other particulars in
+the accounts of the Chamberlain of Colchester, at which place Mary was
+entertained on her way to London, there is:--"For xxxviii. _dozen of
+bread_, xxxixs." In the language of the county from which I write, "a
+dozen of bread" was (and I believe is yet) used to express either one
+loaf, value twelvepence or two loaves, value sixpence each: and even
+when the sizes and price of the loaves varied, it was used to express
+the larger loaf, or the two smaller loaves. A dozen of bread was also
+divided into six twopenny, or twelve penny loaves.
+
+But in the quotation above, thirty-eight dozen of bread are charged
+thirty-nine shillings; whereas the extra one shilling, cannot be divided
+into aliquot parts, so as to express the value of each of the
+thirty-eight dozen of bread.
+
+What was a dozen of bread in 1553?
+
+What is a _baker's dozen_, and why so called?
+
+P.H.F.
+
+
+_Kongs skuggsia._--Is anything, precise known of the date and origin of
+the Icelandic Kongs skuggsia.
+
+F.Q.
+
+
+_Coins of Gandophares._--Coins of Gandophares, an Indian prince, are
+described by Prinsep, _Jour. Asiatic Soc. Bengal_, and in Wilson's
+_Asiana_. The name is met with in the legends of St. Thomas can it be
+found elsewhere?
+
+F.Q.
+
+
+_Satirical Medals._--Is any printed account to be found of a very
+elaborately executed series of caricature medals relating to the
+revolution of 1688?
+
+F.Q.
+
+ * * * * *
+
+
+REPLIES.
+
+GAUDENTIO DI LUCCA.
+
+(Vol. ii., p. 247.)
+
+The work entitled _The Adventures of Sig. Gaudentio di Lucca_ was
+published at London in 1737, in 1 vol. 8vo. It purports to be a
+translation from the Italian, by E.T. Gent but this is a mere fiction.
+The work is evidently an English composition. It belongs to the class of
+_Voyages Imaginaires_, and its main object is to describe the
+institutions and manners of the Mezoranians, an Utopian community,
+supposed to exist in the centre of Africa. Sig. Gaudentio is able, by an
+accident, to visit this people, by the way of Egypt, and to return to
+Europe; he resides at Bologna, where he falls under the suspicion of the
+Inquisition, and having been brought before that tribunal, he describes
+his former life, and his adventures in the country of the Mezoranians.
+
+A second London edition of this work, of the date of 1748, is mentioned
+in the _Gentleman's Magazine_ for Jan. 1777. There is an edition in
+12mo., printed at Edinburgh, 1761. And there is another London edition,
+in 8vo., of the year 1786. Copies of the editions of 1737 and 1786 are
+in the British Museum.
+
+There are two French translations of the work. One is of the date 1746,
+under the title of _Memoires de Gaudentio di Lucca_. The second, of
+1754, by M. Dupuy Demportes, speaks of the first having been made by an
+Englishman named _Milts_; but the person and name appear to be
+fictitious. The first translation is said by Barbier, _Dict. des
+Anonymes_, No. 11,409, to have been revised by the Chevalier de Saint
+Germain, who made additions to it of his own invention. The second
+translation is reprinted in the collection of _Voyages Imaginaires_,
+Amsterdam et Paris, 1787, tom. vi.
+
+An anonymous writer in the _Gent. Mag._ for Jan. 1777, vol. xlvii., p.
+13., speaking of Bishop Berkeley, says that "the _Adventures of Signor
+Gaudentio di Lucca_ have been generally attributed to him." The writer
+of the note added to the _Life of Berkeley_ in Kippis's _Biogr. Brit._,
+1780, vol. ii. p. 261., quotes this statement, and adds that the work is
+ascribed to him by the booksellers in their printed catalogues. This
+writer thinks that the authorship of Bp. Berkeley is consistent with the
+internal evidence of the book but he furnishes no positive testimony on
+the subject. {299}
+
+In a letter from Mr. J.C. Walker to Mr. Pinkerton, of 19 Jan., 1799
+(published in Pinkerton's _Literary Correspondence_, vol. ii., p. 41.),
+Lord Charlemont is referred to as believing that Gaudentio di Lucca is
+founded in fact; that Bishop Berkeley, when he was at Cairo, conversed
+with persons who had attended a caravan, and that he learned from them
+what he narrated in the account of Gaudentio. This passage is cited in
+Southey's _Common-place Book_, p. 204; but the work is manifestly
+fictitious, and it does not appear that Berkeley, though he twice
+visited the Continent, was ever out of Europe.
+
+The date of the publication of Gaudentio is quite consistent with the
+authorship of Berkeley, who died in 1753; but the notice in the
+_Gentleman's Magazine_ only proves the existence of a rumour to that
+effect; and the authentic _Life of Berkeley_, by Dr. Stock, chiefly
+drawn up from materials communicated by Dr. R. Berkeley, brother to the
+Bishop, and prefixed to the collected edition of his work (2 vols. 4to.
+Lond., 1784), makes no allusion to Gaudentio. There is nothing in the
+contents of this work which renders it likely that the authorship should
+have been carefully concealed by Bp. Berkeley and his family, if he had
+really been the author. The literary execution of Gaudentio is good; and
+it is probable that the speculative character of the work, and the fact
+that Berkeley had visited Italy, suggested the idea that he had composed
+it. The belief that Bishop Berkeley was the author of _Gaudentio di
+Lucca_ may therefore be considered as unauthorised.
+
+The copy of the edition of _Gaudentio_ of 1786, which is preserved in
+the British Museum, contains in the title-page the following note, in
+pencil:
+
+ "Written originally in English by Dr. Swale of Huntingdon. See
+ _Gent. Mag._ 1786."
+
+The _Gentleman's Magazine_ for 1786 does not, however, contain any
+information about the authorship of _Gaudentio_; and the name of Dr.
+Swale appears to be unknown in literary history. At the same time, a
+positive entry of this sort, with respect to an obscure person,
+doubtless had some foundation. On the authority of this note, Dr. Swale
+is registered as the author of Gaudentio in the printed catalogue of the
+British Museum Library, whence it has passed into Watt's _Bibl. Brit._
+Perhaps some of your correspondents, who are connected with Huntingdon,
+may be able to throw some light on Dr. Swale.
+
+Lastly, it should be added, that the writer of the article "Berkeley,"
+in the _Biographic Universelle_, adverts to the fact that _Gaudentio di
+Lucca_ has been attributed to him: he proceeds, however, to say that--
+
+ "The author of a Life of Berkeley affirms that Berkeley is not
+ the author of that book, which he supposes to have been written
+ by a Catholic priest imprisoned in the Tower of London."
+
+I have been unable to trace the origin of this statement; nor do I know
+what is the _Life of Berkeley_, to which the writer in the _Biogr.
+Univ._ refers. The Life published under the direction of his family
+makes no allusion to Gaudentio, or to the belief that it was composed by
+Bishop Berkeley.
+
+The _Encyclopedie Methodique_, div. "Econ. pol. et dipl." (Paris, 1784),
+tom. I. p. 89., mentions the following work:--
+
+ "La Republique des Philosophes, ou l'Histoire des Ajaoiens,
+ relation d'un voyage du Chevalier S. van Doelvett en Orient en
+ l'an 1674, qui contient la description du Gouvernement, de la
+ Religion, et des Moeurs des Ajaoiens."
+
+It is stated that this romance, though composed a century before, had
+only been lately published. The editor attributed it to Fontenelle, but
+(as the writer in the _Encycl. Meth._ thinks) probably without reason.
+The title of Berkeley to the authorship of Gaudentio has doubtless no
+better foundation.
+
+L.
+
+
+[Dunlop, _Hist. Fiction_, iii. 491., speaks of this romance as
+"generally, and I believe on good grounds, supposed to be the work of
+the celebrated Berkeley;" adding, "we are told, in the life of this
+celebrated man, that Plato was his favourite author: and, indeed, of all
+English writers Berkeley has most successfully imitated the style and
+manner of that philosopher. It is not impossible, therefore, that the
+fanciful republic of the Grecian sage may have led Berkeley to write
+_Gaudentio di Lucca_, of which the principal object apparently is to
+describe a faultless and patriarchal form of governnent." The subject is
+a very curious one, and invites the further inquiry of our valued
+correspondent.--ED.]
+
+ * * * * *
+
+ON A PASSAGE IN "THE TEMPEST."
+
+I was indebted to MR. SINGER for one of the best emendations in the
+edition of Shakspeare I superintended (vol. vi. p. 559.), and I have too
+much respect for his sagacity and learning to pass, without observation,
+his remarks in "NOTES AND QUERIES" (Vol. ii., p. 259.), on the
+conclusion of the speech of Ferdinand, in "The Tempest," Act iii., Sc.
+1.:--
+
+ "But these sweet thoughts do even refresh my labours;
+ Most busy, least when I do it."
+
+This is the way in which I ventured to print the passage, depending
+mainly upon the old copies. In the folio, 1623, where the play for the
+first time appeared, the last line stands:
+
+ "Most busie lest, when I doe it;"
+
+and in that of 1632,
+
+ "Most busie least, when I doe it:" {300}
+
+so that the whole merit I claim that of altering the place of a comma,
+thereby, as I apprehend, rendering the meaning of the poet evident. The
+principle upon which I proceeded throughout was that of making as little
+variation as possible from the ancient authorities: upon that principle
+I acted in the instance in question, and I frequently found that this
+was the surest mode of removing difficulties. I could not easily adduce
+a stronger proof of this position, than the six words on which the doubt
+at this time has been raised.
+
+Theobald made an important change in the old text, and his reading has
+been that generally adopted:--
+
+ "Most busy-less when I do it."
+
+In restoring the old text I had, therefore, to contend with
+prepossession, against which, it seems, the Rev. Mr. Dyce was not proof,
+although I only know it from MR. SINGER'S letter, never having looked
+into the book in which I suppose, the opinion is advanced.
+
+One reason why I should reject the substitution of "busy-less," even if
+I had not a better mode of overcoming the difficulty, is properly
+adverted to by MR. SINGER, viz. that the word was not in use in the time
+of Shakspeare. The only authority for it, at any period, quoted in
+Todd's Johnson, is this very (as I contend) corrupted passage in the
+Tempest; I have not met with it at all in any of the older dictionaries
+I have been able to consult; and unless the Rev. Mr. Dyce have been more
+fortunate, he was a little short-sighted, as well as a little angry,
+when he wrote his note upon mine. Had he taken more time to reflect, he
+might have found that after all Theobald and I are not so much at odds,
+although he arrives at his end by varying from, and I at mine by
+adhering to, the ancient authorities. In fact, I gain some confirmation
+of what, I believe, is the true meaning of Shakspeare, out of the very
+corruption Theobald introduced, and the Rev. Mr. Dyce, to my surprise,
+supports. I should have expected him to be the very last man who would
+advocate an abandonment of what has been handed down to us in every old
+edition of the play.
+
+The key of the whole speech of Ferdinand is contained in its very
+outset:--
+
+ "There be some sports are painful, and their labour
+ Delight in them sets off;"
+
+and the poet has said nearly the same thing in "Macbeth:"
+
+ "The labour we delight in physics pain."
+
+It is because Ferdinand delights in the labour that he does not feel it
+irksome:
+
+ "This my mean task
+ Would be as heavy to me as odious; but
+ The mistress which I serve quickens what's dead,
+ And makes my labours pleasure."
+
+He, therefore, tells us, at the close, that his labours are refreshed by
+the sweet thoughts of her; that, in fact, his toil is no toil, and that
+when he is "most busy" he "least does it," and suffers least under it.
+The delight he takes in his "mean task" renders it none.
+
+Such I take to be the clear meaning of the poet, though somewhat
+obscurely and paradoxically expressed--
+
+ "Most busy, least when I do it;"
+
+and when Theobald proposed to substitute
+
+ "Most busy-less when I do it,"
+
+he saw, though perhaps not quite distinctly, that such was the poet's
+intention, only, as I have said above, he arrived at it by altering, and
+I by adhering to, the poet's language. I may be allowed to add that I
+came to my conclusion many years before I was asked to put my name to an
+edition of Shakspeare, which interrupted one of the most valuable
+friendships I ever formed.
+
+MR. SINGER will see at once that my interpretation (which I consider
+quite consistent with the character of Shakspeare's mind, as well as
+quite consistent with the expressions he has used throughout the speech
+of the hero), steers clear of his proposal to alter "busie lest," or
+"busie least," of the folios of 1623 and 1632, to _busyest_ or
+_busiest_; although everybody at all acquainted with our old language
+will agree with him in thinking, that if Shakspeare had used "busiest"
+at all, which he does not in any of his productions, he might have said
+_most busiest_ without a violation of the constant practice of his day.
+
+J. PAYNE COLLIER.
+
+September 24. 1850.
+
+ * * * * *
+
+GRAY'S ELEGY.
+
+Perhaps the HERMIT of HOLYPORT will be satisfied with proofs from GRAY
+himself as to the time and manner of the first appearance of the
+_Elegy_.
+
+GRAY thus writes to Dr. Wharton, under the date of "Dec. 17, 1750." [I
+quote Mason's "Life" of its Author, p. 216.]
+
+ "The stanzas" [which he afterwards called _Elegy_ at the
+ suggestion of Mason] "which I now enclose to you have had the
+ misfortune, by _Mr._ [Horace] _Walpole's fault_, to be made
+ still more public," &c.
+
+The next letter in Mason's publication is a letter from "Mr. Gray to Mr.
+Walpole" (p. 217.), and is dated "_Cambridge, Feb._ 11, 1751," which
+runs thus:--
+
+ "As you have brought me into a little sort of distress, you must
+ assist me, I believe, to get out of it as well as I can.
+ Yesterday I had the misfortune of receiving a letter from
+ certain gentlemen (as their bookseller expresses it) who have
+ taken the Magazine of Magazines into their hands: they tell me
+ that an {301} _ingenious_ poem, called 'Reflections in a Country
+ Church-yard,' has been communicated to them, which they are
+ printing forthwith; that they are informed that the _excellent_
+ author of it is I by name, and that they beg not only his
+ _indulgence_, but the _honour_ of his correspondence, &c.... I
+ therefore am obliged to desire you would make Dodsley print it
+ immediately _from your copy_, but without my name, &c. He must
+ correct the press himself ... and the title must be 'Elegy
+ written in a Country Church-yard.' If he would add a line or two
+ to say it came into his hand by accident, I should like it
+ better ... If Dodsley do not do this immediately, he may as well
+ let it alone."
+
+Dr. Johnson (_Life of Gray_) says:
+
+ "His next production, 1750, was his far-famed _Elegy_," &c.
+
+The Doctor adds:
+
+ "Several of his [Gray's] pieces were published, 1753, with
+ designs by Mr. Bentley, and that they might in some form or
+ other make a book, only one side of each leaf was printed. I
+ believe the poems and the plates recommended each other so well,
+ that the whole impression was soon bought."
+
+It contains _six_ poems, one being the _Elegy_. I have before me a copy
+of this collection, which is folio. The plates are clever, and very
+curious; a copy was sold at the Fonthill sale for 3l. 4s.! The copy,
+admirably bound, which I quote, was bought at a bookseller's
+front-window stall for 4s. The title of this collection is "_Designs by
+Mr._ R. BENTLEY, _for six poems by Mr._ J. GRAY."
+
+According to the title-page, it was "printed for R. DODSLEY, in Pall
+Mall, MDCCLIII.," two years previously to the date to which your
+correspondent refers. This (1753) collection gives the line,--
+
+ "Save where the beetle wheels his _droning_ flight."
+
+In the _Elegant Extracts_ (verse), ed. 1805, which, it must be needless
+to mention, was prepared by the able and indefatigable Dr. Vicesimus
+Knox, the accomplished scholar gives the line--
+
+ "Save where the beetle wheels his _drony_ flight."
+
+Dr. Johnson's _Dictionary_ does not insert the word "droning" or
+"drony;" but among his Illustrations attached to the verb "to drone,"
+there are two from Dryden, each, it may be seen, using the word
+"droning." There is no quotation containing the word "drony." Gray's
+language is:
+
+ "Save where the beetle wheels his _droning_ flight,
+ And drowsy _tinklings_ lull the distant folds."
+
+Johnson's second quotation from Dryden may be worth repeating, as
+showing that Gray's language is not wholly different from his
+predecessor's:--
+
+ "Melfoil and honeysuckles pound,
+ With these alluring savours strew the ground,
+ And mix with _tinkling_ brass the cymbal's _droning_ sound."
+
+It is perhaps hardly worth noticing, that there is not uniformity even
+in the title. Johnson calls it, _Elegy in the Church-yard_; Dodsley
+(1753) styles it, _Elegy written in a Country Church-yard_.
+
+A HERMIT AT HAMPSTEAD.
+
+
+_Gray's Elegy_ (Vol. ii., p. 264.).--The HERMIT OF HOLYPORT is referred
+to the 4to. edit. of the _Works of Gray_, by Thos. Jas. Mathias, in
+which, vol. i. at the end of the Elegy, in print, he will find "From the
+original in the handwriting of Thos. Gray:
+
+ "'Save where the beetle wheels his _droning_ flight.'"
+
+From the autograph the Elegy appears to have been written in 1750; and
+the margin states, published in Feb. 1751, by Dodsley, and went through
+four editions in two months; and afterwards a fifth, sixth, seventh and
+eighth, ninth and tenth, and eleventh; printed also in 1753, with Mr.
+Bentley's designs, of which there is a second edition; and again by
+Dodsley in his _Miscellany_, vol. iv.; and in a Scotch collection,
+called the _Union_. Translated into Latin by Chr. Anstey, Esq., and the
+Rev. Mr. Roberts, and published in 1762; and again in the same year by
+Rob. Lloyd, M.A. The original MS. of the above will be found among the
+MSS. of Thos. Gray, in the possession of the Masters and Fellows of
+Pembroke House, Cambridge.
+
+W.S.
+
+Richmond, Sept 21. 1850
+
+ * * * * *
+
+BISHOPS AND THEIR PRECEDENCE.
+(Vol. ii., p. 254.)
+
+Arun is not right, in reference to this Query, in saying that the
+precedence of bishops over the temporal barons is regulated by the
+statute of 31 Hen. VIII. The precedence of bishops over the temporal
+lords is not regulated by the Act of 31 Hen. VIII. for placing the
+lords. They may have originally been summoned to sit in parliament in
+right of their succession to certain baronial lands annexed to, or
+supposed to be annexed to their episcopal sees; but as some of the
+temporal peers were also summoned in right of lands held of the king
+_per baroniam_, that is not a satisfactory reason why they should take
+precedence of temporal barons.
+
+The precedency must have been regulated by some other laws, rules, or
+usage than are presented by the Act of 31 Hen. VIII. The Archbishop of
+Canterbury precedes the Lord Chancellor; the Archbishop of York the Lord
+President of the Council and the Lord Privy Seal; and all bishops
+precede barons. This precedency, however, is not given by the _statute_.
+The Act provides only, in reference to the spiritual peers, that the
+Vicegerent for good and due ministration of justice, to be had in all
+causes and cases touching the ecclesiastical jurisdiction, and for the
+godly reformation and redress of all errors, heresies, and abuses in the
+{302} Church (and all other persons having grant of the said office),
+shall sit and be placed in all parliaments on the _right side_ of the
+parliament chamber, and upon the same form that the Archbishop of
+Canterbury sitteth on, and above the same archbishop and his successors;
+and next to the said Vicegerent shall sit the Archbishop of Canterbury;
+and then, next to him, on the same form and side, shall sit the
+Archbishop of York; and next to him, on the same form and side, the
+Bishop of London; and next to him, on the same side and form, the Bishop
+of Durham; and next to him, on the same side and form, the Bishop of
+Winchester; and then all the other bishops of both provinces of
+Canterbury and York shall sit and be placed on the same side, after
+their ancienties, as it hath been accustomed.
+
+There is nothing here to show in what order they are to rank among the
+great officers, or other temporal peers; nor is the precedency given to
+the Lord Chancellor over the Archbishop of York.
+
+By the Act of Union of Great Britain and Ireland, the archbishops of
+that kingdom have rank immediately after the Archbishop of York, and
+therefore before the great officers (excepting only the Lord
+Chancellor), as well as above dukes; and the Irish bishops immediately
+after those of England.
+
+It may be rightly stated that the high spiritual rank of the bishops is
+a reason for giving them precedence over the temporal lords sitting as
+barons; but has that _reason_ been assigned by any writer of authority,
+or even any writer upon precedence?--the Query suggested by E. (Vol.
+ii., p. 9.) Lord Coke does not assign that reason, but says, because
+they hold their bishopricks of the king _per baroniam_. But the holding
+_per baroniam_, as before observed, would equally apply to the temporal
+lords holding lands by similar tenures, and sitting by writ, and
+receiving summons in ancient times in virtue of such their tenure.
+
+The precedence of bishops over barons was clearly _disputed_ in the
+reign of King Henry VI., when Baker says in his _Chronicle_ (p. 204.),
+_judgment_ was given for the _lords temporal_; but where the judgment,
+or any account of the dispute for precedence, is to be found I cannot
+say. That is what your correspondent G. inquired for (Vol. ii., p. 76.).
+
+C.G.
+
+
+Your correspondent ARUN (Vol. ii., p. 254.) states, on the authority of
+Stephen's _Blackstone_, that--
+
+ "Bishops are temporal barons, and sit in the House of Peers in
+ right of succession to certain ancient baronies annexed or
+ supposed to be annexed to their episcopal lands."
+
+This position, though supported by Lord Coke in more places than one
+(see _Coke upon Littleton_, 134. _a, b_; 3 _Inst._ 30.; 4 _Inst._ 44.),
+and adopted by most other legal text-writers on his authority, cannot,
+it is conceived, be supported. It seems to be clearly ascertained that
+bishops sat in the great councils of this and other kingdoms not
+_ratione baroniarum_ but _jure ecclesiarum_, by custom, long before the
+tenure _per baroniam_ was known. In the preambles to the laws of Ina
+(Wilkins' _Leges Ang.-Sax._ f. 14.), of Athelstan (_ib._ 54.), of Edmund
+(_ib._ 72.), the bishops are mentioned along with others of the great
+council, whilst the tenure _per baroniam_ was not known until after the
+Conquest. The truth seems to be that
+
+ "The bishops of the Conqueror's age were entitled to sit in his
+ councils by the general custom of Europe and by the common law
+ of England, which the conquest did not overturn."--Hallam's
+ _Mid. Ag._ 137-8, 9th ed.
+
+Can any of your readers throw any light on the much disputed tenure _per
+baroniam_? What was its essential character, what its incidents, and in
+what way did it differ from the ordinary tenure _in capite_?
+
+BARO.
+
+ * * * * *
+
+REPLIES TO MINOR QUERIES.
+
+_Leicester and the reputed Poisoners of his Time_ (Vol. ii., pp. 9.
+92.).--This subject receives interesting illustration in the _Memoirs of
+Gervas Holles_, who at some length describes the seduction of the Lady
+Sheffield, by Leicester, at Belvoir Castle, while attending the Queen on
+her Progress. A letter from the Earl to the lady of his love, contained
+the suspicious intimation--
+
+ "_That he had not been unmindful in removing that obstacle_
+ which hindered the full fruition of their contentments; that he
+ had endeavoured one expedient already which had failed, but he
+ would lay another which he doubted not would hit more sure."
+
+This letter the Lady Sheffield accidentally dropped from her pocket; and
+being picked up and given to the Lord Sheffield by his sister Holles, he
+read it with anger and amazement. That night he parted beds, and the
+next day houses; meditating in what manner he might take honourable and
+just revenge. Having resolved, he posted up to London to effect it; but
+the discovery had preceded him to the knowledge of Leicester, who
+finding a necessity to be quick, bribed an Italian physician ("whose
+name," says Holles, "I have forgotten") in whom Lord Sheffield had great
+confidence, to poison him, which was immediately effected after his
+arrival in London. Leicester, after cohabiting with the Lady Sheffield
+for some time, married the widow of the Earl of Essex, who, it is
+thought, says Holles, "_served him in his own kind, every way_."
+
+In the suit afterwards instituted by Sir Robert Dudley, with the view of
+establishing his legitimacy, the Lady Sheffield was examined, and swore
+{303} to a private marriage with the Earl of Leicester, but that she had
+been prevailed on, by threats and pecuniary largesses, to deny the
+marriage, as Queen Elizabeth was desirous that Lord Leicester should
+marry the widow of the Earl of Essex.
+
+One curious circumstance arises out of the revival of these dark doings.
+Are the particular drugs employed by Leicester's Italian physician "in
+removing obstacles" now known and in operation? By a remarkable
+coincidence, in a case of supposed poisoning at Cheltenham, some time
+since, the intended victim escaped with the loss of his hair and his
+nails.
+
+H.K.S.C.
+
+
+_What is the correct Prefix of Mayors?_ (Vol. i., p. 380.)--In Leicester
+the usage has always been to designate the chief magistrate "The
+worshipful the Mayor," which, I believe, is the style used in
+_boroughs_. In _cities_, and places _specially privileged_, "Right
+worshipful" are the terms employed.
+
+JAYTEE.
+
+
+_Marks of Cadency_ (Vol. ii., p. 248.).--The label of the Prince of
+Wales has, from the time of Edward III. up to the present time, been of
+three points argent, and _not_ charged.
+
+F.E.
+
+ * * * * *
+
+
+MISCELLANEOUS.
+
+NOTES ON BOOKS, SALES, CATALOGUES, ETC.
+
+Although we do not usually record in our columns the losses which
+literature sustains from time to time, we cannot permit the death of
+Thomas Amyot, the learned Director of the Camden Society, and for so
+many years the Treasurer of the Society of Antiquaries, to pass without
+rendering our grateful tribute to the memory of one of the most
+intelligent and kindest-hearted men that ever breathed; from whom we, in
+common with so many others, when entering on our literary career,
+received the most friendly assistance, and the most encouraging
+sympathy.
+
+Every fifty years commences a discussion of the great question when the
+current century, or half century, properly begins. We have just seen
+this in the numerous Queries, Answers, Replies, and Rejoinders upon the
+subject which have appeared in the columns of the daily and weekly
+press; the only regular treatise being the essay upon _Ancient and
+Modern Usage in Reckoning_, by professor De Morgan, in the _Companion to
+the Almanack_ for the present year. This Essay is opposed to the idea of
+a "zero year," and one of the advocates of that system of computation
+has, therefore, undertaken a defence of the zero principle, which he
+pronounces, "when properly understood, is undoubtedly the most correct
+basis of reckoning," in a small volume entitled, _An Examination of the
+Century Question_, and in which he maintains the point for which he is
+contending with considerable learning and ingenuity. All who are
+interested in the question at issue, will be at once amused and
+instructed by it.
+
+Mr. Charles Knight announces a new edition of his _Pictorial
+Shakespeare_ under the title of the National Edition; to contain the
+whole of the Notes, Illustrations, &c., thoroughly revised; and which,
+while it will be printed in a clear and beautiful type across the page,
+and not in double columns, will have the advantage of being much cheaper
+than the edition which he originally put forth.
+
+_The Declaration of the Fathers of the Councell of Trent concerning the
+going into Churches at such Times as Hereticall Service is said or
+Heresy preached, &c._, is a reprint of a very rare tract, which
+possesses some present interest, as it bears upon the statement which
+has been of late years much insisted on by Mr. Perceval and other
+Anglican controversialists, that for the first twelve years of
+Elizabeth's reign, and until Pius V.'s celebrated Bull, _Regnans in
+Excelsis_, the Roman Catholics of England were in the habit of
+frequenting the Reformed worship.
+
+We have received the following Catalogues:--W.S. Lincoln's (Cheltenham
+House, Westminster Road) Sixty-first Catalogue of English and Foreign
+Second-hand Books; W.D. Reeve's (98. Chancery Lane) Catalogue No. 13. of
+Cheap Books, many Rare and Curious; R. Kimpton's (31. Wardour Street,
+Soho) Catalogue No. 29. of Second-hand Books in good Condition at very
+reduced Prices.
+
+ * * * * *
+
+BOOKS AND ODD VOLUMES
+
+WANTED TO PURCHASE.
+
+CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY POLL-BOOKS FOR 1780, 1784, 1790, and
+ 1829.
+
+OXFORD UNIVERSITY POLL-BOOKS for 1750, 1768, 1806.
+
+BEN JONSON by CLIFFORD. 8vo. Vols. II., III., and IV.
+
+Letters, stating particulars and lowest price, _carriage free_, to be
+sent to Mr. BELL, Publisher of "NOTES AND QUERIES," 186. Fleet Street.
+
+ * * * * *
+
+NOTICES TO CORRESPONDENTS.
+
+VOLUME THE FIRST OF NOTES AND QUERIES, _with Title-page and very copious
+Index, is now ready, price 9s. 6d., bound in cloth, and may be had, by
+order, of all Booksellers and Newsmen._
+
+_We are unavoidably compelled to postpone numerous NOTES, QUERIES, AND
+REPLIES: indeed we see no way of clearing off our accumulation of
+REPLIES without the publication of an extra Number, to be devoted
+exclusively to the numerous Answers which we now have waiting for
+insertion._
+
+GUTCH'S Literary and Scientific Regsiter and Almanack, _advertised in
+our last No., is for_ 1851 _not_ 1850.
+
+Mr. G.B. RICHARDSON _would oblige us by forwarding the additional verses
+of_ "Long Lonkin" _for our correspondent_ SELEUCUS.
+
+A CONSTANT SUBSCRIBER _will find the line_,
+
+ "Music hath charms to soothe the savage breast,"
+
+_in Congreve's_ Mourning Bride.
+
+JANUS DOUSA. _In our next No._
+
+MEDICUS, _who inquires respecting the origin of the proverbial saying,
+"Quem Deus vult perdere," is referred to our First Volume_, pp. 347.
+351. 421. and 476. _The original line reads "Quem Jupiter vult," and is
+Barnes' translation of a fragment of_ Euripides. {304}
+
+ * * * * *
+
+THE QUARTERLY REVIEW,
+No. CLXXIV., is published THIS DAY.
+
+CONTENTS:
+ I. TICKNOR'S HISTORY OF SPANISH LITERATURE.
+ II. CHURCH AND EDUCATION IN WALES.
+ III. FORMS OF SALUTATION.
+ IV. SIBERIA AND CALIFORNIA.
+ V. MURE ON THE LITERATURE OF GREECE.
+ VI. METROPOLITAN WATER SUPPLY.
+ VII. ANECDOTES OF THE PROVISIONAL GOVERNMENT.
+VIII. COCHRANES'S YOUNG ITALY.
+ IX. LAST DAY OF LOUIS-PHILIPPE.
+
+JOHN MURRAY, Albemarle Street.
+
+ * * * * *
+
+Will be published on the 1st of November, 1850, with the other
+Almanacks,
+
+THE LITERARY AND SCIENTIFIC REGISTER AND ALMANACK for 1851. Price 3s.
+6d.
+
+Dedicated by especial permission to H.R.H. Prince Albert, by J.W.G.
+GUTCH, M.R.C.S.L., F.L.S.;
+
+Containing a condensed mass of scientific and useful information alike
+valuable to the student and man of science.
+
+Tenth Yearly issue.
+
+Published by D. BOGUE, Fleet Street, London
+
+ * * * * *
+
+Shortly will be Published.
+
+THE ARCHITECTURAL QUARTERLY REVIEW. A Literary Periodical devoted to
+Works appertaining to the Art and Science of Architecture. Prospectuses
+may be obtained from the Publisher. Letters for the Editor, and books,
+drawings, models, and specimens, to be addressed to the care of the
+Publisher.
+
+GEORGE BELL, 186. Fleet Street.
+
+ * * * * *
+
+Royal 4to., cloth, price 2l. 2s.
+
+EXAMPLES OF ANCIENT PULPITS EXISTING IN ENGLAND. Selected and drawn from
+Sketches and Measurements taken on the Spot, with Descriptive
+Letterpress. By FRANCIS T. DOLLMAN, Architect.
+
+This Work contains thirty quarto Plates, three of which are highly
+finished in Colours, restored accurately from the existing indications.
+The Pulpits delineated are St. Westburga, Chester: SS. Peter and Paul,
+Shrewsbury; St. Michael, Coventry; St. Mary, Wendon; St. Mary and All
+Saints, Fotheringay; All Saints, North Cerney; Holy Trinity, Nallsea;
+St. Peter Winchcombe; St. John Baptist, Cirencester; St. Mary, Totness;
+St. Mary, Frampton. Holy Trinity, Old Aston; St. Benedict, Glastonbury;
+St. Peter, Wolverhampton: St. Andrew, Cheddar (coloured); St. Andrew,
+Banwell; St. George, Brakworth; Holy Trinity, Long Sutton (coloured);
+St. Saviour, Dartmouth (coloured); All Saints, Sudbury; All Saints,
+Hawstead; St. Mary de Lode, Gloucester; St. Mary, North Petherton.
+
+GEORGE BELL, 186. Fleet Street.
+
+ * * * * *
+
+To be completed in Four Parts, Parts I. and II., price 5s. each plain;
+7s. 6d. coloured.
+
+ANTIQUARIAN GLEANINGS IN THE NORTH OF ENGLAND: being Examples of Antique
+Furniture, Plate, Church Decoration, Objects of Historical Interest, &c.
+Drawn and etched by W.B. SCOTT.
+
+"A collection of antiquarian relics, chiefly in the decorative branch of
+art, preserved in the northern counties, portrayed by a very competent
+hand ... All are drawn with that distinctness which makes them available
+for the antiquarian, for the artist who is studying costume, and for the
+study of decorative art."--_Spectator._
+
+Parts III. and IV., completing the Work, are in preparation, and will be
+published shortly.
+
+GEORGE BELL, 186. Fleet Street.
+
+ * * * * *
+
+THE EDINBURGH REVIEW,
+No CLXXXVIII., will be publishd on THURSDAY,
+October 10th, 1850.
+
+ I. HISTORY OF THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE.
+ II. THE UNITED STATES.
+ III. BRITISH MUSEUM: CATALOGUE OF PRINTED BOOKS.
+ IV. MURE'S CRITICAL HISTORY OF THE LANGUAGE
+ AND LITERATURE OF ANTIENT GREECE.
+ V. COL. CHESNEY'S EXPEDITION TO THE EUPHRATES AND TIGRIS.
+ VI. RECENT CLASSICAL ROMANCES.
+VIII. DIFFICULTIES OF REPLUBLICAN FRANCE.
+ IX. HORACE AND TASSO.
+
+London: LONGMAN AND CO. Edinburgh: A. and C. BLACK.
+
+ * * * * *
+
+MR. L.A. LEWIS'S SALES for OCTOBER, 1850, FRIDAY 11TH., and SATURDAY
+12th. Valuable Books, Architechural Books, Books of Prints, &c., from
+the West of England, including Stuart and Revett's Antiquities of
+Athens, 4 vols.; unedited Antiuities of Attica; Piranesi Campus Martius
+Antiqua Orbis; Houghton Gallery, 2 vols; Bowyer's Hume's England;
+Rogers' Collection of Prints, 2 vols.; Knorr, Deliciae Naturae Selectae, 2
+vols.; Tableaux Historiques de la Revolution Francaise, 2 vols.; Stow's
+London, by Strype, 2 vols.; Domesday Book, 2 vols.; Edmondson's
+Heraldry, 2 vols.; Illustrated London News, 11 vols.; Encyclopaedia
+Metropolitana, 29 vols.; Neale's Gentlemen's Seats, 6 vols.; Loddiges'
+Botanical Cabinet, 10 vols., large paper; Maund's Botanic Garden, 9
+vols.; Sweet's Geraniums, 5 vols.; Beauties of England and Wales, 32
+vols.; Hogarth's Works, 3 vols., red morocco; Knight's London, 6 vols.;
+Retrospective Review, 14 vols.; Bayle, Dictionnaire Historique, 16
+vols.; Lodge's Illustrious Portraits, 10 vols.; Knight's Pictorial
+Bible, 3 vols.; Clarke's Commentary on the Bible, 6 vols.; a few
+Pictures and Prints, &c.
+
+FRIDAY, 18TH, AND SATURDAY, 19TH.--Books, including the stock of the
+late Mr. C. Whiten.
+
+FRIDAY, 25TH,--Pictures, Prints, Books, Stereotype Plates, Copyrights,
+Books in Quires, &c.
+
+Mr. C.A. Lewis will have Sales on each Friday in November and December.
+
+125. Fleet Street.
+
+ * * * * *
+
+Just published, Part 9, price 9s., plain; Tinted, small paper, 10s. 6d.;
+Proof, large paper, 12s.
+
+THE CHURCHES OF THE MIDDLE AGES: or, Select Specimens of Early and
+Middle Pointed Structures; with a few of the pures; Late Pointed
+Examples, Illustrated by Geometric and Perspective Drawings. By HENRY
+BOWMAN and J.S. CROWTHER, Architects. Containing Illustrations of St.
+Peter's Church, Thrukingham, Norfolk; St. John's, Cley, Norfolk; and St.
+Andrew's, Heckington, Lincolnshire.
+
+To be completed in Twenty Parts, each containing Six Plates, Imperial
+folio. Issued at intervals of two months.
+
+"Ewerby is a magnficent specimen of a Flowing Middle-Pointed Church. it
+is most perfectly measured and described: one can follow the most
+rcondite beauties of the construction, mouldings and joints, in these
+Plates, almost as well as in the original structure. Such a monograph as
+this will be of incalculable value to the architects of our Colonies or
+the United States, who have no means of access to ancient churches. The
+Plates are on stone, done with remarkable skill and distinctness. Of
+Heckington we can only say that the perspective view from the south-east
+presents a very vision of beauty; we can hardle conceive anything more
+perfect. We heartlily recommend this series to all who are able to
+patronize it."--_Ecclesiologist_, Oct. 1849.
+
+"This, if completed in a similar manner to the Parts now out, will be a
+beautiful and valuable work. The perspective of St. Andrew's,
+Heckington, is a charming specimen of lithography, by Hawkins. We
+unhesitatingly recommend Messrs. Bowman and Crowther's work to our
+readers, as likely to be useful to them."--_Builder_.
+
+London: GEORGE BELL, 186. Fleet Street.
+
+ * * * * *
+
+Printed by THOMAS CLARK SHAW, of No. 8. New Street Square, at No. 5. New
+Street Square, in the Parish of St. Bride in the City of London; and
+published by GEORGE BELL, of No. 186. Fleet Street, in the Parish of St.
+Dunstan in the West, in the City of London, Publisher, at No. 186. Fleet
+Street aforesaid.--Saturday, October 5. 1850.
+
+
+
+
+
+End of the Project Gutenberg EBook of Notes and Queries, Number 49,
+Saturday, Oct. 5, 1850, by Various
+
+*** END OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK NOTES AND QUERIES ***
+
+***** This file should be named 13480.txt or 13480.zip *****
+This and all associated files of various formats will be found in:
+ https://www.gutenberg.org/1/3/4/8/13480/
+
+Produced by The Internet Library of Early Journals, Jon Ingram, David
+King, and the Online Distributed Proofreading Team.
+
+
+Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions
+will be renamed.
+
+Creating the works from public domain print editions means that no
+one owns a United States copyright in these works, so the Foundation
+(and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United States without
+permission and without paying copyright royalties. Special rules,
+set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license, apply to
+copying and distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works to
+protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm concept and trademark. Project
+Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if you
+charge for the eBooks, unless you receive specific permission. If you
+do not charge anything for copies of this eBook, complying with the
+rules is very easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose
+such as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and
+research. They may be modified and printed and given away--you may do
+practically ANYTHING with public domain eBooks. Redistribution is
+subject to the trademark license, especially commercial
+redistribution.
+
+
+
+*** START: FULL LICENSE ***
+
+THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE
+PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK
+
+To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free
+distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work
+(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project
+Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full Project
+Gutenberg-tm License (available with this file or online at
+https://gutenberg.org/license).
+
+
+Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic works
+
+1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to
+and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property
+(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all
+the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or destroy
+all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your possession.
+If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the
+terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or
+entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8.
+
+1.B. "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark. It may only be
+used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who
+agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few
+things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works
+even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See
+paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement
+and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
+works. See paragraph 1.E below.
+
+1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the Foundation"
+or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection of Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic works. Nearly all the individual works in the
+collection are in the public domain in the United States. If an
+individual work is in the public domain in the United States and you are
+located in the United States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from
+copying, distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative
+works based on the work as long as all references to Project Gutenberg
+are removed. Of course, we hope that you will support the Project
+Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting free access to electronic works by
+freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm works in compliance with the terms of
+this agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with
+the work. You can easily comply with the terms of this agreement by
+keeping this work in the same format with its attached full Project
+Gutenberg-tm License when you share it without charge with others.
+
+1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern
+what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are in
+a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States, check
+the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this agreement
+before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, distributing or
+creating derivative works based on this work or any other Project
+Gutenberg-tm work. The Foundation makes no representations concerning
+the copyright status of any work in any country outside the United
+States.
+
+1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg:
+
+1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate
+access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear prominently
+whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work on which the
+phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the phrase "Project
+Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed, viewed,
+copied or distributed:
+
+This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with
+almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or
+re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included
+with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org
+
+1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is derived
+from the public domain (does not contain a notice indicating that it is
+posted with permission of the copyright holder), the work can be copied
+and distributed to anyone in the United States without paying any fees
+or charges. If you are redistributing or providing access to a work
+with the phrase "Project Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the
+work, you must comply either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1
+through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the
+Project Gutenberg-tm trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or
+1.E.9.
+
+1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted
+with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution
+must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any additional
+terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms will be linked
+to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works posted with the
+permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of this work.
+
+1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this
+work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm.
+
+1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this
+electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without
+prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with
+active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project
+Gutenberg-tm License.
+
+1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary,
+compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including any
+word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access to or
+distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format other than
+"Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official version
+posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm web site (www.gutenberg.org),
+you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a
+copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon
+request, of the work in its original "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other
+form. Any alternate format must include the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1.
+
+1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying,
+performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works
+unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.
+
+1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing
+access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works provided
+that
+
+- You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from
+ the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method
+ you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is
+ owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he
+ has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the
+ Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments
+ must be paid within 60 days following each date on which you
+ prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your periodic tax
+ returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked as such and
+ sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the
+ address specified in Section 4, "Information about donations to
+ the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation."
+
+- You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies
+ you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he
+ does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+ License. You must require such a user to return or
+ destroy all copies of the works possessed in a physical medium
+ and discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of
+ Project Gutenberg-tm works.
+
+- You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any
+ money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the
+ electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days
+ of receipt of the work.
+
+- You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
+ distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works.
+
+1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set
+forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from
+both the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and Michael
+Hart, the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark. Contact the
+Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below.
+
+1.F.
+
+1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable
+effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread
+public domain works in creating the Project Gutenberg-tm
+collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
+works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may contain
+"Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or
+corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual
+property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other medium, a
+computer virus, or computer codes that damage or cannot be read by
+your equipment.
+
+1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right
+of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project
+Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project
+Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all
+liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal
+fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT
+LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE
+PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH F3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE
+TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE
+LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR
+INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH
+DAMAGE.
+
+1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a
+defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can
+receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a
+written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you
+received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium with
+your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you with
+the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu of a
+refund. If you received the work electronically, the person or entity
+providing it to you may choose to give you a second opportunity to
+receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If the second copy
+is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing without further
+opportunities to fix the problem.
+
+1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth
+in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS', WITH NO OTHER
+WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO
+WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTIBILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.
+
+1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied
+warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages.
+If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the
+law of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be
+interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by
+the applicable state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any
+provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions.
+
+1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the
+trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone
+providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in accordance
+with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the production,
+promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works,
+harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees,
+that arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do
+or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg-tm
+work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or deletions to any
+Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any Defect you cause.
+
+
+Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of
+electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of computers
+including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It exists
+because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations from
+people in all walks of life.
+
+Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the
+assistance they need, is critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's
+goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will
+remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project
+Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure
+and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future generations.
+To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation
+and how your efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4
+and the Foundation web page at https://www.pglaf.org.
+
+
+Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
+Foundation
+
+The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non profit
+501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the
+state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal
+Revenue Service. The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification
+number is 64-6221541. Its 501(c)(3) letter is posted at
+https://pglaf.org/fundraising. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg
+Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent
+permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state's laws.
+
+The Foundation's principal office is located at 4557 Melan Dr. S.
+Fairbanks, AK, 99712., but its volunteers and employees are scattered
+throughout numerous locations. Its business office is located at
+809 North 1500 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887, email
+business@pglaf.org. Email contact links and up to date contact
+information can be found at the Foundation's web site and official
+page at https://pglaf.org
+
+For additional contact information:
+ Dr. Gregory B. Newby
+ Chief Executive and Director
+ gbnewby@pglaf.org
+
+Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg
+Literary Archive Foundation
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without wide
+spread public support and donations to carry out its mission of
+increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be
+freely distributed in machine readable form accessible by the widest
+array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations
+($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt
+status with the IRS.
+
+The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating
+charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United
+States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a
+considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up
+with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations
+where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To
+SEND DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any
+particular state visit https://pglaf.org
+
+While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we
+have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition
+against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who
+approach us with offers to donate.
+
+International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make
+any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from
+outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff.
+
+Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation
+methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other
+ways including including checks, online payments and credit card
+donations. To donate, please visit: https://pglaf.org/donate
+
+
+Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
+works.
+
+Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project Gutenberg-tm
+concept of a library of electronic works that could be freely shared
+with anyone. For thirty years, he produced and distributed Project
+Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer support.
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed
+editions, all of which are confirmed as Public Domain in the U.S.
+unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not necessarily
+keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper edition.
+
+Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search facility:
+
+ https://www.gutenberg.org
+
+This Web site includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm,
+including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary
+Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to
+subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks.
+
diff --git a/old/13480.zip b/old/13480.zip
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..3a673a9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/old/13480.zip
Binary files differ