diff options
| author | Roger Frank <rfrank@pglaf.org> | 2025-10-15 04:42:13 -0700 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Roger Frank <rfrank@pglaf.org> | 2025-10-15 04:42:13 -0700 |
| commit | 13ebd17d2fb02cd338cb471d046959c42eed2195 (patch) | |
| tree | 4c711ce750fb20ac8f90c5405a8cc1a1cd9edd18 /old/13474-h | |
Diffstat (limited to 'old/13474-h')
| -rw-r--r-- | old/13474-h/13474-h.htm | 8132 |
1 files changed, 8132 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/old/13474-h/13474-h.htm b/old/13474-h/13474-h.htm new file mode 100644 index 0000000..338f183 --- /dev/null +++ b/old/13474-h/13474-h.htm @@ -0,0 +1,8132 @@ +<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"> +<html> +<head> +<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"> +<title>The Project Gutenberg eBook of Women and the Alphabet, by Thomas Wentworth Higginson</title> +<style type="text/css"> + body {background:#ffffff; + color:black; + font-family: "Times New Roman", serif; + font-size:14pt; + margin-top:100px; + margin-left:10%; + margin-right:10%; + text-align:justify} + hr { width: 100%; + height: 5px; } + hr.narrow { width: 50%; + height: 1px; } + a:link {color:blue; + text-decoration:none} + link {color:blue; + text-decoration:none} + a:visited {color:blue; + text-decoration:none} + a:hover {color:red} + pre {font-size:8pt;} +</style> +</head> +<body> +<h1>The Project Gutenberg eBook, Women and the Alphabet, by Thomas Wentworth +Higginson</h1> +<pre> +This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with +almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or +re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included +with this eBook or online at <a href = "https://www.gutenberg.org">www.gutenberg.org</a></pre> +<p>Title: Women and the Alphabet</p> +<p>Author: Thomas Wentworth Higginson</p> +<p>Release Date: September 15, 2004 [eBook #13474]</p> +<p>Language: English</p> +<p>Character set encoding: ISO-8859-1</p> +<p>***START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK WOMEN AND THE ALPHABET***</p> +<br> +<br> +<center><h3>E-text prepared by Judith B. Glad<br> + and the Project Gutenberg Online Distributed Proofreading Team</h3></center> +<br> +<br> +<hr class="full" noshade> + +<p> </p> + +<p> </p> + +<h1 align="center"><big>WOMEN<br> +AND THE ALPHABET</big></h1> + +<h3 align="center"><big><i>A Series of Essays</i></big></h3> + +<p align="center">BY</p> + +<h3 align="center">THOMAS WENTWORTH HIGGINSON</h3> + +<h4 align="center">1881</h4> +<br> +<br> + +<center> +<hr class="narrow"> +</center> +<br> +<br> +<br> +<br> + +<h3 align="center">PREFATORY NOTE</h3> + +<p>The first essay in this volume, "Ought Women to learn the Alphabet?" +appeared originally in the "Atlantic Monthly" of February, 1859, and has +since been reprinted in various forms, bearing its share, I trust, in the +great development of more liberal views in respect to the training and +duties of women which has made itself manifest within forty years. There +was, for instance, a report that it was the perusal of this essay which +led the late Miss Sophia Smith to the founding of the women's college +bearing her name at Northampton, Massachusetts.</p> + +<p>The remaining papers in the volume formed originally a part of a book +entitled "Common Sense About Women" which was made up largely of papers +from the "Woman's Journal." This book was first published in 1881 and was +reprinted in somewhat abridged form some years later in London +(Sonnenschein). It must have attained a considerable circulation there, as +the fourth (stereotyped) edition appeared in 1897. From this London +reprint a German translation was made by Fräulein Eugenie Jacobi, +under the title "Die Frauenfrage und der gesunde Menschenverstand" +(Schupp: Neuwied and Leipzig, 1895).</p> + +<p align="right">T.W.H.</p> + +<p>CAMBRIDGE, MASS.</p> + +<center> +<hr class="narrow"> +</center> +<br> +<br> +<h3 align="center"><a name="TOC">CONTENTS</a></h3> + +<p><a href="#1">I. OUGHT WOMEN TO LEARN THE ALPHABET?</a></p> + +<p><a href="#2">II. PHYSIOLOGY</a></p> + +<p><a href="#2-1">Too Much Natural History</a></p> + +<p><a href="#2-2">Darwin, Huxley, and Buckle</a></p> + +<p><a href="#2-3">The Spirit of Small Tyranny</a></p> + +<p><a href="#2-4">The Noble Sex</a></p> + +<p><a href="#2-5">The Truth about our Grandmothers</a></p> + +<p><a href="#2-6">The Physique of American Women</a></p> + +<p><a href="#2-7">The Limitations of Sex</a></p> + +<p><a href="#3">III. TEMPERAMENT</a></p> + +<p><a href="#3-1">The Invisible Lady</a></p> + +<p><a href="#3-2">Sacred Obscurity</a></p> + +<p><a href="#3-3">Virtues in Common</a></p> + +<p><a href="#3-4">Individual Differences</a></p> + +<p><a href="#3-5">Angelic Superiority</a></p> + +<p><a href="#3-6">Vicarious Honors</a></p> + +<p><a href="#3-7">The Gospel of Humiliation</a></p> + +<p><a href="#3-8">Celery and Cherubs</a></p> + +<p><a href="#3-9">The Need of Cavalry</a></p> + +<p><a href="#3-10">The Reason Firm, the Temperate Will</a></p> + +<p><a href="#3-11">Allures to Brighter Worlds, and leads the Way</a></p> + +<p><a href="#4">IV. THE HOME</a></p> + +<p><a href="#4-1">Wanted--Homes</a></p> + +<p><a href="#4-2">The Origin of Civilization</a></p> + +<p><a href="#4-3">The Low-Water Mark</a></p> + +<p><a href="#4-4">Obey</a></p> + +<p><a href="#4-5">Woman in the Chrysalis</a></p> + +<p><a href="#4-6">Two and Two</a></p> + +<p><a href="#4-7">A Model Household</a></p> + +<p><a href="#4-8">A Safeguard for the Family</a></p> + +<p><a href="#4-9">Women as Economists</a></p> + +<p><a href="#4-10">Greater Includes Less</a></p> + +<p><a href="#4-11">A Copartnership</a></p> + +<p><a href="#4-12">One Responsible Head</a></p> + +<p><a href="#4-13">Asking for Money</a></p> + +<p><a href="#4-14">Womanhood and Motherhood</a></p> + +<p><a href="#4-15">A German Point of View</a></p> + +<p><a href="#4-16">Childless Women</a></p> + +<p><a href="#4-17">The Prevention of Cruelty to Mothers</a></p> + +<p><a href="#5">V. SOCIETY</a></p> + +<p><a href="#5-1">Foam and Current</a></p> + +<p><a href="#5-2">In Society</a></p> + +<p><a href="#5-3">The Battle of the Cards</a></p> + +<p><a href="#5-4">Some Working Women</a></p> + +<p><a href="#5-5">The Empire of Manners</a></p> + +<p><a href="#5-6">Girlsterousness</a></p> + +<p><a href="#5-7">Are Women Natural Aristocrats?</a></p> + +<p><a href="#5-8">Mrs. Blank's Daughters</a></p> + +<p><a href="#5-9">The European Plan</a></p> + +<p><a href="#5-10">Featherses</a></p> + +<p><a href="#6">VI. STUDY AND WORK</a></p> + +<p><a href="#6-1">Experiments</a></p> + +<p><a href="#6-2">Intellectual Cinderellas</a></p> + +<p><a href="#6-3">Cupid and Psychology</a></p> + +<p><a href="#6-4">Self-Supporting Wives</a></p> + +<p><a href="#6-5">Thorough</a></p> + +<p><a href="#6-6">Literary Aspirants</a></p> + +<p><a href="#6-7">The Career of Letters</a></p> + +<p><a href="#6-8">Talking and Taking</a></p> + +<p><a href="#6-9">How to Speak in Public</a></p> + +<p><a href="#7">VII. PRINCIPLES OF GOVERNMENT</a></p> + +<p><a href="#7-1">We the People</a></p> + +<p><a href="#7-2">The Use of the Declaration of Independence</a></p> + +<p><a href="#7-3">Some Old-Fashioned Principles</a></p> + +<p><a href="#7-4">Founded on a Rock</a></p> + +<p><a href="#7-5">The Good of the Governed</a></p> + +<p><a href="#7-6">Ruling at Second Hand</a></p> + +<p><a href="#8">VIII. SUFFRAGE</a></p> + +<p><a href="#8-1">Drawing the Line</a></p> + +<p><a href="#8-2">For Self-Protection</a></p> + +<p><a href="#8-3">Womanly Statesmanship</a></p> + +<p><a href="#8-4">Too Much Prediction</a></p> + +<p><a href="#8-5">First-Class Carriages</a></p> + +<p><a href="#8-6">Education <i>via</i> Suffrage</a></p> + +<p><a href="#8-7">Follow Your Leaders</a></p> + +<p><a href="#8-8">How to Make Women Understand Politics</a></p> + +<p><a href="#8-9">Inferior to Men, and near to Angels</a></p> + +<p><a href="#9">IX. OBJECTIONS TO SUFFRAGE</a></p> + +<p><a href="#9-1">The Facts of Sex</a></p> + +<p><a href="#9-2">How will it Result?</a></p> + +<p><a href="#9-3">I have all the Rights I want</a></p> + +<p><a href="#9-4">Sense Enough to Vote</a></p> + +<p><a href="#9-5">An Infelicitous Epithet</a></p> + +<p><a href="#9-6">The Rob Roy Theory</a></p> + +<p><a href="#9-7">The Votes of Non Combatants</a></p> + +<p><a href="#9-8">Mmanners repeal Laws</a></p> + +<p><a href="#9-9">Dangerous Voters</a></p> + +<p><a href="#9-10">How Women will Legislate</a></p> + +<p><a href="#9-11">Individuals <i>vs.</i> Classes</a></p> + +<p><a href="#9-12">Defeats before Victories</a></p> + +<br> +<br> +<center> +<hr class="narrow"> +</center> +<br> +<br> +<br> +<h2 align="center"><a name="1"></a><a href="#TOC">I<br> + OUGHT WOMEN TO LEARN THE ALPHABET?</a></h2> + +<p>Paris smiled, for an hour or two, in the year 1801, when, amidst +Napoleon's mighty projects for remodelling the religion and government of +his empire, the ironical satirist, Sylvain Maréchal, thrust in his +"Plan for a Law prohibiting the Alphabet to Women."[1] Daring, keen, +sarcastic, learned, the little tract retains to-day so much of its +pungency, that we can hardly wonder at the honest simplicity of the +author's friend and biographer, Madame Gacon Dufour, who declared that he +must be insane, and soberly replied to him.</p> + +<p>His proposed statute consists of eighty-two clauses, and is fortified +by a "whereas" of a hundred and thirteen weighty reasons. He exhausts the +range of history to show the frightful results which have followed this +taste of fruit of the tree of knowledge; quotes from the +Encyclopédie, to prove that the woman who knows the alphabet has +already lost a portion of her innocence; cites the opinion of +Molière, that any female who has unhappily learned anything in this +line should affect ignorance, when possible; asserts that knowledge rarely +makes men attractive, and females never; opines that women have no +occasion to peruse Ovid's "Art of Love," since they know it all in +advance; remarks that three quarters of female authors are no better than +they should be; maintains that Madame Guion would have been far more +useful had she been merely pretty and an ignoramus, such as Nature made +her,--that Ruth and Naomi could not read, and Boaz probably would never +have married into the family had they possessed that accomplishment,--that +the Spartan women did not know the alphabet, nor the Amazons, nor +Penelope, nor Andromache, nor Lucretia, nor Joan of Arc, nor Petrarch's +Laura, nor the daughters of Charlemagne, nor the three hundred and +sixty-five wives of Mohammed; but that Sappho and Madame de Maintenon +could read altogether too well; while the case of Saint Brigitta, who +brought forth twelve children and twelve books, was clearly exceptional, +and afforded no safe precedent.</p> + +<p>It would seem that the brilliant Frenchman touched the root of the +matter. Ought women to learn the alphabet? There the whole question lies. +Concede this little fulcrum, and Archimedea will move the world before she +has done with it: it becomes merely a question of time. Resistance must be +made here or nowhere. <i>Obsta principiis</i>. Woman must be a subject or +an equal: there is no middle ground. What if the Chinese proverb should +turn out to be, after all, the summit of wisdom, "For men, to cultivate +virtue is knowledge; for women, to renounce knowledge is virtue"?</p> + +<p>No doubt, the progress of events is slow, like the working of the laws +of gravitation generally. Certainly there has been but little change in +the legal position of women since China was in its prime, until within the +last half century. Lawyers admit that the fundamental theory of English +and Oriental law is the same on this point: Man and wife are one, and that +one is the husband. It is the oldest of legal traditions. When Blackstone +declares that "the very being and existence of the woman is suspended +during the marriage," and American Kent echoes that "her legal existence +and authority are in a manner lost;" when Petersdorff asserts that "the +husband has the right of imposing such corporeal restraints as he may deem +necessary," and Bacon that "the husband hath, by law, power and dominion +over his wife, and may keep her by force within the bounds of duty, and +may beat her, but not in a violent or cruel manner;" when Mr. Justice +Coleridge rules that the husband, in certain cases, "has a right to +confine his wife in his own dwelling-house, and restrain her from liberty +for an indefinite time," and Baron Alderson sums it all up tersely, "The +wife is only the <i>servant</i> of her husband,"--these high authorities +simply reaffirm the dogma of the Gentoo code, four thousand years old and +more: "A man, both day and night, must keep his wife so much in subjection +that she by no means be mistress of her own actions. If the wife have her +own free will, notwithstanding she be of a superior caste, she will behave +amiss."</p> + +<p>Yet behind these unchanging institutions, a pressure has been for +centuries becoming concentrated, which, now that it has begun to act, is +threatening to overthrow them all. It has not yet operated very visibly in +the Old World, where, even in England, the majority of women have not till +lately mastered the alphabet sufficiently to sign their own names in the +marriage register. But in this country the vast changes of the last few +years are already a matter of history. No trumpet has been sounded, no +earthquake has been felt, while State after State has ushered into legal +existence one half of the population within its borders. Surely, here and +now, might poor M. Maréchal exclaim, the bitter fruits of the +original seed appear. The sad question recurs, Whether women ought ever to +have tasted of the alphabet.</p> + +<p>It is true that Eve ruined us all, according to theology, without +knowing her letters. Still there is something to be said in defence of +that venerable ancestress. The Veronese lady, Isotta Nogarola, five +hundred and thirty-six of whose learned epistles were preserved by De +Thou, composed a dialogue on the question, Whether Adam or Eve had +committed the greater sin. But Ludovico Domenichi, in his "Dialogue on the +Nobleness of Women," maintains that Eve did not sin at all, because she +was not even created when Adam was told not to eat the apple. It was "in +Adam all died," he shrewdly says; nobody died in Eve: which looks +plausible. Be that as it may, Eve's daughters are in danger of swallowing +a whole harvest of forbidden fruit, in these revolutionary days, unless +something be done to cut off the supply.</p> + +<p>It has been seriously asserted, that during the last half century more +books have been written by women and about women than during all the +previous uncounted ages. It may be true; although, when we think of the +innumerable volumes of <i>Mémoires</i> by French women of the +seventeenth and eighteenth centuries,--each justifying the existence of +her own ten volumes by the remark, that all her contemporaries were +writing as many,--we have our doubts. As to the increased multitude of +general treatises on the female sex, however,--its education, life, +health, diseases, charms, dress, deeds, sphere, rights, wrongs, work, +wages, encroachments, and idiosyncrasies generally,--there can be no doubt +whatever; and the poorest of these books recognizes a condition of public +sentiment of which no other age ever dreamed.</p> + +<p>Still, literary history preserves the names of some reformers before +the Reformation, in this matter. There was Signora Moderata Fonte, the +Venetian, who left a book to be published after her death, in 1592, "Dei +Meriti delle Donne." There was her townswoman, Lucrezia Marinella, who +followed, ten years after, with her essay, "La Nobilità e la +Eccelenza delle Donne, con Difetti e Mancamenti degli Uomini,"--a +comprehensive theme, truly! Then followed the all-accomplished Anna Maria +Schurman, in 1645, with her "Dissertatio de Ingenii Muliebris ad Doctrinam +et meliores Literas Aptitudine," with a few miscellaneous letters appended +in Greek and Hebrew. At last came boldly Jacquette Guillaume, in 1665, and +threw down the gauntlet in her title-page, "Les Dames Illustres; où +par bonnes et fortes Raisons il se prouve que le Sexe Feminin surpasse en +toute Sorte de Genre le Sexe Masculin;" and with her came Margaret +Boufflet and a host of others; and finally, in England, Mary +Wollstonecraft, whose famous book, formidable in its day, would seem +rather conservative now; and in America, that pious and worthy dame, Mrs. +H. Mather Crocker, Cotton Mather's grandchild, who, in 1848, published the +first book on the "Rights of Woman" ever written on this side the +Atlantic.</p> + +<p>Meanwhile there have never been wanting men, and strong men, to echo +these appeals. From Cornelius Agrippa and his essay (1509) on the +excellence of woman and her preëminence over man, down to the first +youthful thesis of Agassiz, "Mens Feminae Viri Animo superior," there has +been a succession of voices crying in the wilderness. In England, Anthony +Gibson wrote a book, in 1599, called "A Woman's Woorth, defended against +all the Men in the World, proving them to be more Perfect, Excellent, and +Absolute in all Vertuous Actions than any Man of what Qualitie soever, +<i>Interlarded with Poetry</i>." <i>Per contra</i>, the learned Acidalius +published a book in Latin, and afterwards in French, to prove that women +are not reasonable creatures. Modern theologians are at worst merely +sub-acid, and do not always say so, if they think so. Meanwhile most +persons have been content to leave the world to go on its old course, in +this matter as in others, and have thus acquiesced in that stern judicial +decree with which Timon of Athens sums up all his curses upon +womankind,--"If there sit twelve women at the table, let a dozen of them +be--as they are."</p> + +<p>Ancient or modern, nothing in any of these discussions is so valuable +as the fact of the discussion itself. There is no discussion where there +is no wrong. Nothing so indicates wrong as this morbid self-inspection. +The complaints are a perpetual protest, the defences a perpetual +confession. It is too late to ignore the question; and, once opened, it +can be settled only on absolute and permanent principles. There is a +wrong; but where? Does woman already know too much, or too little? Was she +created for man's subject, or his equal? Shall she have the alphabet, or +not?</p> + +<p>Ancient mythology, which undertook to explain everything, easily +accounted for the social and political disabilities of woman. Goguet +quotes the story from Saint Augustine, who got it from Varro. Cecrops, +building Athens, saw starting from the earth an olive-plant and a +fountain, side by side. The Delphic oracle said that this indicated a +strife between Minerva and Neptune for the honor of giving a name to the +city, and that the people must decide between them. Cecrops thereupon +assembled the men, and the women also, who then had a right to vote; and +the result was that Minerva carried the election by a glorious majority of +one. Then Attica was overflowed and laid waste: of course the citizens +attributed the calamity to Neptune, and resolved to punish the women. It +was therefore determined that in future they should not vote, nor should +any child bear the name of its mother.</p> + +<p>Thus easily did mythology explain all troublesome inconsistencies; but +it is much that it should even have recognized them as needing +explanation. The real solution is, however, more simple. The obstacle to +the woman's sharing the alphabet, or indeed any other privilege, has been +thought by some to be the fear of impairing her delicacy, or of destroying +her domesticity, or of confounding the distinction between the sexes. +These may have been plausible excuses. They have even been genuine, though +minor, anxieties. But the whole thing, I take it, had always one simple, +intelligible basis,--sheer contempt for the supposed intellectual +inferiority of woman. She was not to be taught, because she was not worth +teaching. The learned Acidalius aforesaid was in the majority. According +to Aristotle and the Peripatetics, woman was <i>animal occasionatum</i>, +as if a sort of monster and accidental production. Mediaeval councils, +charitably asserting her claims to the rank of humanity, still pronounced +her unfit for instruction. In the Hindoo dramas she did not even speak the +same language with her master, but used the dialect of slaves. When, in +the sixteenth century, Françoise de Saintonges wished to establish +girls' schools in France, she was hooted in the streets; and her father +called together four doctors, learned in the law, to decide whether she +was not possessed by demons, to think of educating women,--<i>pour +s'assurer qu'instruire des femmes n'était pas un oeuvre du +démon</i>.</p> + +<p>It was the same with political rights. The foundation of the Salic Law +was not any sentimental anxiety to guard female delicacy and domesticity; +it was, as stated by Froissart, a blunt, hearty contempt: "The kingdom of +France being too noble to be ruled by a woman." And the same principle was +reaffirmed for our own institutions, in rather softened language, by +Theophilus Parsons, in his famous defence of the rights of Massachusetts +men (the "Essex Result," in 1778): "Women, what age soever they are of, +are not considered as having a sufficient acquired discretion [to exercise +the franchise]."</p> + +<p>In harmony with this are the various maxims and <i>bon-mots</i> of +eminent men, in respect to women. Niebuhr thought he should not have +educated a girl well,--he should have made her know too much. Lessing +said, "The woman who thinks is like the man who puts on rouge, +ridiculous." Voltaire said, "Ideas are like beards: women and young men +have none." And witty Dr. Maginn carries to its extreme the atrocity, "We +like to hear a few words of sense from a woman, as we do from a parrot, +because they are so unexpected." Yet how can we wonder at these opinions, +when the saints have been severer than the sages?--since the pious +Fénelon taught that true virgin delicacy was almost as incompatible +with learning as with vice; and Dr. Channing complained, in his "Essay on +Exclusion and Denunciation," of "women forgetting the tenderness of their +sex," and arguing on theology.</p> + +<p>Now this impression of feminine inferiority may be right or wrong, but +it obviously does a good deal towards explaining the facts it assumes. If +contempt does not originally cause failure, it perpetuates it. +Systematically discourage any individual, or class, from birth to death, +and they learn, in nine cases out of ten, to acquiesce in their +degradation, if not to claim it as a crown of glory. If the Abbé +Choisi praised the Duchesse de Fontanges for being "beautiful as an angel +and silly as a goose," it was natural that all the young ladies of the +court should resolve to make up in folly what they wanted in charms. All +generations of women having been bred under the shadow of intellectual +contempt, they have, of course, done much to justify it. They have often +used only for frivolous purposes even the poor opportunities allowed them. +They have employed the alphabet, as Molière said, chiefly in +spelling the verb <i>Amo</i>. Their use of science has been like that of +Mlle. de Launay, who computed the decline in her lover's affection by his +abbreviation of their evening walk in the public square, preferring to +cross it rather than take the circuit; "from which I inferred," she says, +"that his passion had diminished in the ratio between the diagonal of a +rectangular parallelogram and the sum of two adjacent sides." And their +conception, even of art, has been too often on the scale of Properzia de +Rossi, who carved sixty-five heads on a walnut, the smallest of all +recorded symbols of woman's sphere.</p> + +<p>All this might, perhaps, be overcome, if the social prejudice which +discourages women would only reward proportionately those who surmount the +discouragement. The more obstacles, the more glory, if society would only +pay in proportion to the labor; but it does not. Women being denied, not +merely the training which prepares for great deeds, but the praise and +compensation which follow them, have been weakened in both directions. The +career of eminent men ordinarily begins with college and the memories of +Miltiades, and ends with fortune and fame: woman begins under +discouragement, and ends beneath the same. Single, she works with half +preparation and half pay; married, she puts name and wages into the +keeping of her husband, shrinks into John Smith's "lady" during life, and +John Smith's "relict" on her tombstone; and still the world wonders that +her deeds, like her opportunities, are inferior.</p> + +<p>Evidently, then, the advocates of woman's claims--those who hold that +"the virtues of the man and the woman are the same," with Antisthenes, or +that "the talent of the man and the woman is the same," with Socrates in +Xenophon's "Banquet"--must be cautious lest they attempt to prove too +much. Of course, if women know as much as the men, without schools and +colleges, there is no need of admitting them to those institutions. If +they work as well on half pay, it diminishes the inducement to give them +the other half. The safer position is, to claim that they have done just +enough to show what they might have done under circumstances less +discouraging. Take, for instance, the common remark, that women have +invented nothing. It is a valid answer, that the only implements +habitually used by woman have been the needle, the spindle, and the +basket; and tradition reports that she herself invented all three. In the +same way it may be shown that the departments in which women have equalled +men have been the departments in which they have had equal training, equal +encouragement, and equal compensation; as, for instance, the theatre. +Madame Lagrange, the <i>prima donna</i>, after years of costly musical +instruction, wins the zenith of professional success; she receives, the +newspapers affirm, sixty thousand dollars a year, travelling expenses for +ten persons, country-houses, stables, and liveries, besides an uncounted +revenue of bracelets, bouquets, and <i>billets-doux.</i> Of course, every +young <i>débutante</i> fancies the same thing within her own reach, +with only a brief stage-vista between. On the stage there is no deduction +for sex, and, therefore, woman has shown in that sphere an equal genius. +But every female common-school teacher in the United States finds the +enjoyment of her four hundred dollars a year to be secretly embittered by +the knowledge that the young college stripling in the next schoolroom is +paid twice that sum for work no harder or more responsible than her own, +and that, too, after the whole pathway of education has been obstructed +for her, and smoothed for him. These may be gross and carnal +considerations; but Faith asks her daily bread, and fancy must be fed. We +deny woman her fair share of training, of encouragement, of remuneration, +and then talk fine nonsense about her instincts and intuitions. We say +sentimentally with the Oriental proverbialist, "Every book of knowledge is +implanted by nature in the heart of woman,"--and make the compliment a +substitute for the alphabet.</p> + +<p>Nothing can be more absurd than to impose entirely distinct standards, +in this respect, on the two sexes, or to expect that woman, any more than +man, will accomplish anything great without due preparation and adequate +stimulus. Mrs. Patten, who navigated her husband's ship from Cape Horn to +California, would have failed in the effort, for all her heroism, if she +had not, unlike most of her sex, been taught to use her Bowditch's +"Navigator." Florence Nightingale, when she heard of the distresses in the +Crimea, did not, as most people imagine, rise up and say, "I am a woman, +ignorant but intuitive, with very little sense and information, but +exceedingly sublime aspirations; my strength lies in my weakness; I can do +all things without knowing anything about them." Not at all: during ten +years she had been in hard training for precisely such services; had +visited all the hospitals in London, Edinburgh, Dublin, Paris, Lyons, +Rome, Brussels, and Berlin; had studied under the Sisters of Charity, and +been twice a nurse in the Protestant Institution at Kaiserswerth. +Therefore she did not merely carry to the Crimea a woman's heart, as her +stock in trade, but she knew the alphabet of her profession better than +the men around her. Of course, genius and enthusiasm are, for both sexes, +elements unforeseen and incalculable; but, as a general rule, great +achievements imply great preparations and favorable conditions. To +disregard this truth is unreasonable in the abstract, and cruel in its +consequences. If an extraordinary male gymnast can clear a height of ten +feet with the aid of a springboard, it would be considered slightly absurd +to ask a woman to leap eleven feet without one; yet this is precisely what +society and the critics have always done. Training and wages and social +approbation are very elastic springboards; and the whole course of history +has seen these offered bounteously to one sex, and as sedulously withheld +from the other. Let woman consent to be a doll, and there was no finery so +gorgeous, no baby-house so costly, but she might aspire to share its +lavish delights; let her ask simply for an equal chance to learn, to +labor, and to live, and it was as if that same doll should open its lips, +and propound Euclid's forty-seventh proposition. While we have all +deplored the helpless position of indigent women, and lamented that they +had no alternative beyond the needle, the wash-tub, the schoolroom, and +the street, we have usually resisted their admission into every new +occupation, denied them training, and cut their compensation down. Like +Charles Lamb, who atoned for coming late to the office in the morning by +going away early in the afternoon, we have first, half educated women, and +then, to restore the balance, only half paid them. What innumerable +obstacles have been placed in their way as female physicians; what a +complication of difficulties has been encountered by them, even as +printers, engravers, and designers! In London, Mr. Bennett was once mobbed +for lecturing to women on watchmaking. In this country, we have known +grave professors refuse to address lyceums which thought fit to employ an +occasional female lecturer. Mr. Comer stated that it was "in the face of +ridicule and sneers" that he began to educate American women as +bookkeepers many years ago; and it was a little contemptible in Miss +Muloch to revive the same satire in "A Woman's Thoughts on Women," when +she must have known that in half the retail shops in Paris her own sex +rules the ledger, and Mammon knows no Salic law.</p> + +<p>We find, on investigation, what these considerations would lead us to +expect, that eminent women have commonly been exceptional in training and +position, as well as in their genius. They have excelled the average of +their own sex because they have shared the ordinary advantages of the +other sex. Take any department of learning or skill; take, for instance, +the knowledge of languages, the universal alphabet, philology. On the +great stairway at Padua stands the statue of Elena Cornaro, professor of +six languages in that once renowned university. But Elena Cornaro was +educated like a boy, by her father. On the great door of the University of +Bologna is inscribed the epitaph of Clotilda Tambroni, the honored +correspondent of Porson, and the first Greek scholar of southern Europe in +her day. But Clotilda Tambroni was educated like a boy, by Emanuele +Aponte. How fine are those prefatory words, "by a Right Reverend Prelate," +to that pioneer book in Anglo-Saxon lore, Elizabeth Elstob's grammar: "Our +earthly possessions are indeed our patrimony, as derived to us by the +industry of our fathers; but the language in which we speak is our mother +tongue, and who so proper to play the critic in this as the females?" Yet +this particular female obtained the rudiments of her rare education from +her mother, before she was eight years old, in spite of much opposition +from her right reverend guardians. Adelung declares that all modern +philology is founded on the translation of a Russian vocabulary into two +hundred different dialects by Catherine II. But Catherine shared, in +childhood, the instructors of her brother, Prince Frederick, and was +subject to some reproach for learning, though a girl, so much more rapidly +than he did. Christina of Sweden ironically reproved Madame Dacier for her +translation of Callimachus: "Such a pretty girl as you are, are you not +ashamed to be so learned?" But Madame Dacier acquired Greek by contriving +to do her embroidery in the room where her father was teaching her stupid +brother; and her queenly critic had herself learned to read Thucydides, +harder Greek than Callimachus, before she was fourteen. And so down to our +own day, who knows how many mute, inglorious Minervas may have perished +unenlightened, while Margaret Fuller Ossoli and Elizabeth Barrett Browning +were being educated "like boys."</p> + +<p>This expression simply means that they had the most solid training +which the times afforded. Most persons would instantly take alarm at the +very words; that is, they have so little faith in the distinctions which +Nature has established, that they think, if you teach the alphabet, or +anything else, indiscriminately to both sexes, you annul all difference +between them. The common reasoning is thus: "Boys and girls are +acknowledged to be very unlike. Now, boys study Greek and algebra, +medicine and bookkeeping. Therefore girls should not." As if one should +say: "Boys and girls are very unlike. Now, boys eat beef and potatoes. +Therefore, obviously, girls should not."</p> + +<p>The analogy between physical and spiritual food is precisely in point. +The simple truth is, that, amid the vast range of human powers and +properties, the fact of sex is but one item. Vital and momentous in +itself, it does not constitute the whole organism, but only a part. The +distinction of male and female is special, aimed at a certain end; and, +apart from that end, it is, throughout all the kingdoms of Nature, of +minor importance. With but trifling exceptions, from infusoria up to man, +the female animal moves, breathes, looks, listens, runs, flies, swims, +pursues its food, eats it, digests it, in precisely the same manner as the +male: all instincts, all characteristics, are the same, except as to the +one solitary fact of parentage. Mr. Ten Broeck's race-horses, Pryor and +Prioress, were foaled alike, fed alike, trained alike, and finally ran +side by side, competing for the same prize. The eagle is not checked in +soaring by any consciousness of sex, nor asks the sex of the timid hare, +its quarry. Nature, for high purposes, creates and guards the sexual +distinction, but keeps it subordinate to those still more important.</p> + +<p>Now all this bears directly upon the alphabet. What sort of philosophy +is that which says, "John is a fool; Jane is a genius: nevertheless, John, +being a man, shall learn, lead, make laws, make money; Jane, being a +woman, shall be ignorant, dependent, disfranchised, underpaid"? Of course, +the time is past when one would state this so frankly, though Comte comes +quite near it, to say nothing of the Mormons; but this formula really lies +at the bottom of the reasoning one hears every day. The answer is, Soul +before sex. Give an equal chance, and let genius and industry do the rest. +<i>La carrière ouverte aux talens</i>! Every man for himself, every +woman for herself, and the alphabet for us all.</p> + +<p>Thus far, my whole course of argument has been defensive and +explanatory. I have shown that woman's inferiority in special +achievements, so far as it exists, is a fact of small importance, because +it is merely a corollary from her historic position of degradation. She +has not excelled, because she has had no fair chance to excel. Man, +placing his foot upon her shoulder, has taunted her with not rising. But +the ulterior question remains behind. How came she into this attitude +originally? Explain the explanation, the logician fairly demands. Granted +that woman is weak because she has been systematically degraded: but why +was she degraded? This is a far deeper question,--one to be met only by a +profounder philosophy and a positive solution. We are coming on ground +almost wholly untrod, and must do the best we can.</p> + +<p>I venture to assert, then, that woman's social inferiority has been, to +a great extent, in the past a legitimate thing. To all appearance, history +would have been impossible without it, just as it would have been +impossible without an epoch of war and slavery. It is simply a matter of +social progress,--a part of the succession of civilizations. The past has +been inevitably a period of ignorance, of engrossing physical necessities, +and of brute force,--not of freedom, of philanthropy, and of culture. +During that lower epoch, woman was necessarily an inferior, degraded by +abject labor, even in time of peace,--degraded uniformly by war, chivalry +to the contrary notwithstanding. Behind all the courtesies of Amadis and +the Cid lay the stern fact,--woman a child or a toy. The flattering +troubadours chanted her into a poet's paradise; but alas! that kingdom of +heaven suffered violence, and the violent took it by force. The truth +simply was, that her time had not come. Physical strength must rule for a +time, and she was the weaker. She was very properly refused a feudal +grant, by reason, say "Les Coustumes de Normandie," of her unfitness for +war or policy: <i>C'est l'homme ki se bast et ki conseille</i>. Other +authorities put it still more plainly: "A woman cannot serve the emperor +or feudal lord in war, on account of the decorum of her sex; nor assist +him with advice, because of her limited intellect; nor keep his counsel, +owing to the infirmity of her disposition." All which was, no doubt, in +the majority of cases, true; and the degradation of woman was simply a +part of a system which has, indeed, had its day, but has bequeathed its +associations.</p> + +<p>From this reign of force, woman never freed herself by force. She could +not fight, or would not. Bohemian annals, to be sure, record the legend of +a literal war between the sexes, in which the women's army was led by +Libussa and Wlasla, and which finally ended with the capture, by the army +of men, of Castle Dziewin, Maiden's Tower, whose ruins are still visible +near Prague. The armor of Libussa is still shown at Vienna; and the guide +calls attention to the long-peaked toes of steel, with which, he avers, +the tender princess was wont to pierce the hearts of her opponents, while +careering through the battle. And there are abundant instances in which +women have fought side by side with men, and on equal terms. The ancient +British women mingled in the wars of their husbands, and their princesses +were trained to the use of arms in the Maiden's Castle at Edinburgh, in +the Isle of Skye. The Moorish wives and maidens fought in defence of their +European peninsula; and the Portuguese women fought on the same soil, +against the armies of Philip II. The king of Siam has, at present, a +body-guard of four hundred women: they are armed with lance and rifle, are +admirably disciplined, and their commander (appointed after saving the +king's life at a tiger-hunt) ranks as one of the royal family, and has ten +elephants at her service. When the all-conquering Dahomian army marched +upon Abbeokuta, in 1851, they numbered ten thousand men and six thousand +women. The women were, as usual, placed foremost in the assault, as being +most reliable; and of the eighteen hundred bodies left dead before the +walls, the vast majority were of women. The Hospital of the Invalides, in +Paris, has sheltered, for half a century, a fine specimen of a female +soldier, "Lieutenant Madame Bulan," who lived to be more than eighty years +old, had been decorated by Napoleon's own hand with the cross of the +Legion of Honor, and was credited on the hospital books with "seven years' +service, seven campaigns, three wounds, several times distinguished, +especially in Corsica, in defending a fort against the English." But these +cases, though interesting to the historian, are still exceptional; and the +instinctive repugnance they inspire is a condemnation, not of women, but +of war.</p> + +<p>The reason, then, for the long subjection of woman has been simply that +humanity was passing through its first epoch, and her full career was to +be reserved for the second. As the different races of man have appeared +successively upon the stage of history, so there has been an order of +succession of the sexes. Woman's appointed era, like that of the Teutonic +races, was delayed, but not omitted. It is not merely true that the empire +of the past has belonged to man, but that it has properly belonged to him; +for it was an empire of the muscles, enlisting, at best, but the lower +powers of the understanding. There can be no question that the present +epoch is initiating an empire of the higher reason, of arts, affections, +aspirations; and for that epoch the genius of woman has been reserved. The +spirit of the age has always kept pace with the facts, and outstripped the +statutes. Till the fulness of time came, woman was necessarily kept a +slave to the spinning-wheel and the needle; now higher work is ready; +peace has brought invention to her aid, and the mechanical means for her +emancipation are ready also. No use in releasing her till man, with his +strong arm, had worked out his preliminary share in civilization. "Earth +waits for her queen" was a favorite motto of Margaret Fuller Ossoli; but +it would be more correct to say that the queen has waited for her earth, +till it could be smoothed and prepared for her occupancy. Now Cinderella +may begin to think of putting on her royal robes.</p> + +<p>Everybody sees that the times are altering the whole material position +of woman; but most people do not appear to see the inevitable social and +moral changes which are also involved. As has been already said, the woman +of ancient history was a slave to physical necessities, both in war and +peace. In war she could do too little; in peace she did too much, under +the material compulsions which controlled the world. How could the Jews, +for instance, elevate woman? They could not spare her from the wool and +the flax, and the candle that goeth not out by night. In Rome, when the +bride first stepped across her threshold, they did not ask her, Do you +know the alphabet? they asked simply, Can you spin? There was no higher +epitaph than Queen Amalasontha's,--<i>Domum servavit, lanam fecit</i>. In +Boeotia, brides were conducted home in vehicles whose wheels were burned +at the door, in token that they were never to leave the house again. +Pythagoras instituted at Crotona an annual festival for the distaff; +Confucius, in China, did the same for the spindle; and these celebrated +not the freedom, but the serfdom, of woman.</p> + +<p>And even into modern days this same tyrannical necessity has lingered. +"Go spin, you jades! go spin!" was the only answer vouchsafed by the Earl +of Pembroke to the twice-banished nuns of Wilton. Even now, travellers +agree that throughout civilized Europe, with the partial exception of +England and France, the profound absorption of the mass of women in +household labors renders their general elevation impossible. But with us +Americans, and in this age, when all these vast labors are being more and +more transferred to arms of brass and iron; when Rochester grinds the +flour and Lowell weaves the cloth, and the fire on the hearth has gone +into black retirement and mourning; when the wiser a virgin is, the less +she has to do with oil in her lamp; when the needle has made its last +dying speech and confession in the "Song of the Shirt," and the +sewing-machine has changed those doleful marches to delightful +measures,--how is it possible for the blindest to help seeing that a new +era is begun, and that the time has come for woman to learn the +alphabet?</p> + +<p>Nobody asks for any abolition of domestic labor for women, any more +than of outdoor labor for men. Of course, most women will still continue +to be mainly occupied with the indoor care of their families, and most men +with their external support. All that is desirable for either sex is such +an economy of labor, in this respect, as shall leave some spare time to be +appropriated in other directions. The argument against each new +emancipation of woman is precisely that always made against the liberation +of serfs and the enfranchisement of plebeians,--that the new position will +take them from their legitimate business. "How can he [or she] get wisdom +that holdeth the plough [or the broom],--whose talk is of bullocks [or of +babies]?" Yet the American farmer has already emancipated himself from +these fancied incompatibilities; and so will the farmer's wife. In a +nation where there is no leisure class and no peasantry, this whole theory +of exclusion is an absurdity. We all have a little leisure, and we must +all make the most of it. If we will confine large interests and duties to +those who have nothing else to do, we must go back to monarchy at once. If +otherwise, then the alphabet, and its consequences, must be open to woman +as to man. Jean Paul says nobly, in his "Levana," that, "before and after +being a mother, a woman is a human being, and neither maternal nor +conjugal relation can supersede the human responsibility, but must become +its means and instrument." And it is good to read the manly speech, on +this subject, of John Quincy Adams, quoted at length in Quincy's life of +him, in which, after fully defending the political petitions of the women +of Plymouth, he declares that "the correct principle is that women are not +only justified, but exhibit the most exalted virtue, when they do depart +from the domestic circle, and enter on the concerns of their country, of +humanity, and of their God."</p> + +<p>There are duties devolving on every human being,--duties not small nor +few, but vast and varied,--which spring from home and private life, and +all their sweet relations. The support or care of the humblest household +is a function worthy of men, women, and angels, so far as it goes. From +these duties none must shrink, neither man nor woman; the loftiest genius +cannot ignore them; the sublimest charity must begin with them. They are +their own exceeding great reward; their self-sacrifice is infinite joy; +and the selfishness which discards them is repaid by loneliness and a +desolate old age. Yet these, though the most tender and intimate portion +of human life, do not form its whole. It is given to noble souls to crave +other interests also, added spheres, not necessarily alien from these; +larger knowledge, larger action also; duties, responsibilities, anxieties, +dangers, all the aliment that history has given to its heroes. Not home +less, but humanity more. When the high-born English lady in the Crimean +hospital, ordered to a post of almost certain death, only raised her hands +to heaven, and said, "Thank God!" she did not renounce her true position +as woman: she claimed it. When the queen of James I. of Scotland, already +immortalized by him in stately verse, won a higher immortality by +welcoming to her fair bosom the dagger aimed at his; when the Countess of +Buchan hung confined in her iron cage, outside Berwick Castle, in penalty +for crowning Robert the Bruce; when the stainless soul of Joan of Arc met +God, like Moses, in a burning flame,--these things were as they should be. +Man must not monopolize these privileges of peril, the birthright of great +souls. Serenades and compliments must not replace the nobler hospitality +which shares with woman the opportunity of martyrdom. Great administrative +duties also, cares of state, for which one should be born gray-headed, how +nobly do these sit upon a woman's brow! Each year adds to the storied +renown of Elizabeth of England, greatest sovereign of the greatest of +historic nations. Christina of Sweden, alone among the crowned heads of +Europe (so says Voltaire), sustained the dignity of the throne against +Richelieu and Mazarin. And these queens most assuredly did not sacrifice +their womanhood in the process; for her Britannic Majesty's wardrobe +included four thousand gowns; and Mile, de Montpensier declares that when +Christina had put on a wig of the latest fashion, "she really looked +extremely pretty."</p> + +<p><i>Les races se féminisent</i>, said Buffon,--"The world is +growing more feminine." It is a compliment, whether the naturalist +intended it or not. Time has brought peace; peace, invention; and the +poorest woman of to-day is born to an inheritance of which her ancestors +never dreamed. Previous attempts to confer on women social and political +equality,--as when Leopold, Grand Duke of Tuscany, made them magistrates; +or when the Hungarian revolutionists made them voters; or when our own New +Jersey tried the same experiment in a guarded fashion in early times, and +then revoked the privilege, because (as in the ancient fable) the women +voted the wrong way;--these things were premature, and valuable only as +recognitions of a principle. But in view of the rapid changes now going +on, he is a rash man who asserts the "Woman Question" to be anything but a +mere question of time. The fulcrum has been already given in the alphabet, +and we must simply watch, and see whether the earth does not move.</p> + +<p>There is the plain fact: woman must be either a subject or an equal; +there is no middle ground. Every concession to a supposed principle only +involves the necessity of the next concession for which that principle +calls. Once yield the alphabet, and we abandon the whole long theory of +subjection and coverture: tradition is set aside, and we have nothing but +reason to fall back upon. Reasoning abstractly, it must be admitted that +the argument has been, thus far, entirely on the women's side, inasmuch as +no man has yet seriously tried to meet them with argument. It is an +alarming feature of this discussion, that it has reversed, very generally, +the traditional positions of the sexes: the women have had all the logic; +and the most intelligent men, when they have attempted the other side, +have limited themselves to satire and gossip. What rational woman can be +really convinced by the nonsense which is talked in ordinary society +around her,--as, that it is right to admit girls to common schools, and +equally right to exclude them from colleges; that it is proper for a woman +to sing in public, but indelicate for her to speak in public; that a +post-office box is an unexceptionable place to drop a bit of paper into, +but a ballot-box terribly dangerous? No cause in the world can keep above +water, sustained by such contradictions as these, too feeble and slight to +be dignified by the name of fallacies. Some persons profess to think it +impossible to reason with a woman, and such critics certainly show no +disposition to try the experiment.</p> + +<p>But we must remember that all our American institutions are based on +consistency, or on nothing: all claim to be founded on the principles of +natural right; and when they quit those, they are lost. In all European +monarchies it is the theory that the mass of the people are children to be +governed, not mature beings to govern themselves; this is clearly stated +and consistently applied. In the United States we have formally abandoned +this theory for one half of the human race, while for the other half it +flourishes with little change. The moment the claims of woman are +broached, the democrat becomes a monarchist. What Americans commonly +criticise in English statesmen, namely, that they habitually evade all +arguments based on natural right, and defend every legal wrong on the +ground that it works well in practice, is the precise defect in our +habitual view of woman. The perplexity must be resolved somehow. Most men +admit that a strict adherence to our own principles would place both sexes +in precisely equal positions before law and constitution, as well as in +school and society. But each has his special quibble to apply, showing +that in this case we must abandon all the general maxims to which we have +pledged ourselves, and hold only by precedent. Nay, he construes even +precedent with the most ingenious rigor; since the exclusion of women from +all direct contact with affairs can be made far more perfect in a republic +than is possible in a monarchy, where even sex is merged in rank, and the +female patrician may have far more power than the male plebeian. But, as +matters now stand among us, there is no aristocracy but of sex: all men +are born patrician, all women are legally plebeian; all men are equal in +having political power, and all women in having none. This is a paradox so +evident, and such an anomaly in human progress, that it cannot last +forever, without new discoveries in logic, or else a deliberate return to +M. Maréchal's theory concerning the alphabet.</p> + +<p>Meanwhile, as the newspapers say, we anxiously await further +developments. According to present appearances, the final adjustment lies +mainly in the hands of women themselves. Men can hardly be expected to +concede either rights or privileges more rapidly than they are claimed, or +to be truer to women than women are to each other. In fact, the worst +effect of a condition of inferiority is the weakness it leaves behind; +even when we say, "Hands off!" the sufferer does not rise. In such a case, +there is but one counsel worth giving. More depends on determination than +even on ability. Will, not talent, governs the world. Who believed that a +poetess could ever be more than an Annot Lyle of the harp, to soothe with +sweet melodies the leisure of her lord, until in Elizabeth Barrett +Browning's hands the thing became a trumpet? Where are gone the sneers +with which army surgeons and parliamentary orators opposed Mr. Sidney +Herbert's first proposition to send Florence Nightingale to the Crimea? In +how many towns was the current of popular prejudice against female orators +reversed by one winning speech from Lucy Stone! Where no logic can +prevail, success silences. First give woman, if you dare, the alphabet, +then summon her to her career: and though men, ignorant and prejudiced, +may oppose its beginnings, they will at last fling around her conquering +footsteps more lavish praises than ever greeted the opera's idol,--more +perfumed flowers than ever wooed, with intoxicating fragrance, the fairest +butterfly of the ball-room.</p> + +<p>[Footnote 1: <i>Projet d'une loi portant defense d'apprendre à +lire aux femmes.</i>]</p> + +<center> +<hr class="narrow"> +</center> +<h2 align="center"><a name="2"></a><a href="#TOC">II<br> + PHYSIOLOGY</a></h2> + +<blockquote> +<p>"Allein, bevor und nachdem man Mutter ist, ist Man ein Mensch; die +mütterliche Bestimmung aber, oder gar die heeliche, kann nicht die +menschliche überwiegen oder ersetzen, sondern sie muss das Mittel, +nicht der Zweck derselben sein."--J.P.F. Richter: Levana, § 89.</p> + +<p>"But, before and after being a mother, one is a human being; and +neither the motherly nor the wifely destination can overbalance or replace +the human, but must become its means, not its end."</p> +</blockquote> + +<h2><a name="2-1"></a><a href="#TOC">TOO MUCH NATURAL HISTORY</a></h2> + +<p>Lord Melbourne, speaking of the fine ladies in London who were fond of +talking about their ailments, used to complain that they gave him too much +of their natural history. There are a good many writers--usually men--who, +with the best intentions, discuss woman as if she had merely a physical +organization, and as if she existed only for one object, the production +and rearing of children. Against this some protest may well be made.</p> + +<p>Doubtless there are few things more important to a community than the +health of its women. The Sandwich Island proverb says:--</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>"If strong is the frame of the mother,<br> +The son will give laws to the people."</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>And, in nations where all men give laws, all men need mothers of strong +frames.</p> + +<p>Moreover, there is no harm in admitting that all the rules of our +structure are imperative; that soul and body, whether of man or woman, are +made in harmony, so that each part of our nature must accept the +limitations of the other. A man's soul may yearn to the stars; but so long +as the body cannot jump so high, he must accept the body's veto. It is the +same with any veto interposed in advance by the physical structure of +woman. Nobody objects to this general principle. It is only when clerical +gentlemen or physiological gentlemen undertake to go a step farther, and +put in that veto on their own responsibility, that it is necessary to say, +"Hands off, gentlemen! Precisely because women are women, they, not you, +are to settle that question."</p> + +<p>One or two points are clear. Every specialist is liable to overrate his +own specialty; and the man who thinks of woman only as a wife and mother +is apt to forget, that, before she was either of these, she was a human +being. "Women, as such," says an able writer, "are constituted for +purposes of maternity and the continuation of mankind." Undoubtedly, and +so were men, as such, constituted for paternity. But very much depends on +what relative importance we assign to the phrase, "as such." Even an essay +so careful, so moderate, and so free from coarseness, as that here quoted, +suggests, after all, a slight one-sidedness,--perhaps a natural reaction +from the one-sidedness of those injudicious reformers who allow themselves +to speak slightingly of "the merely animal function of child-bearing." +Higher than either--wiser than both put together--is that noble statement +with which Jean Paul begins his fine essay on the education of girls in +"Levana." "Before being a wife or mother, one is a human being; and +neither motherly nor wifely destination can overbalance or replace the +human, but must become its means, not end. As above the poet, the painter, +or the hero, so above the mother, does the human being rise +preëminent."</p> + +<p>Here is sure anchorage. We can hold to this. And, fortunately, all the +analogies of nature sustain this position. Throughout nature the laws of +sex rule everywhere; but they rule a kingdom of their own, always +subordinate to the greater kingdom of the vital functions. Every creature, +male or female, finds in its sexual relations only a subordinate part of +its existence. The need of food, the need of exercise, the joy of living, +these come first, and absorb the bulk of its life, whether the individual +be male or female. This <i>Antiope</i> butterfly, that flits at this +moment past my window,--the first of the season,--spends almost all its +existence in a form where the distinction of sex lies dormant: a few days, +I might almost say a few hours, comprise its whole sexual consciousness, +and the majority of its race die before reaching that epoch. The law of +sex is written absolutely through the whole insect world. Yet everywhere +it is written as a secondary and subordinate law. The life which is common +to the sexes is the principal life; the life which each sex leads, "as +such," is a minor and subordinate thing.</p> + +<p>The same rule pervades nature. Two riders pass down the street before +my window. One rides a horse, the other a mare. The animals were perhaps +foaled in the same stable, of the same progenitors. They have been reared +alike, fed alike, trained alike, ridden alike; they need the same +exercise, the same grooming; nine tenths of their existence are the same, +and only the other tenth is different. Their whole organization is marked +by the distinction of sex; but, though the marking is ineffaceable, the +distinction is not the first or most important fact.</p> + +<p>If this be true of the lower animals, it is far more true of the +higher. The mental and moral laws of the universe touch us first and +chiefly as human beings. We eat our breakfasts as human beings, not as men +or women; and it is the same with nine tenths of our interests and duties +in life. In legislating or philosophizing for woman, we must neither +forget that she has an organization distinct from that of man, nor must we +exaggerate the fact. Not "first the womanly and then the human," but first +the human and then the womanly, is to be the order of her training.</p> + +<h2><a name="2-2"></a><a href="#TOC">DARWIN, HUXLEY, and BUCKLE</a></h2> + +<p>When any woman, old or young, asks the question, Which among all modern +books ought I to read first? the answer is plain. She should read Buckle's +lecture before the Royal Institution upon "The Influence of Woman on the +Progress of Knowledge." It is one of two papers contained in a thin volume +called "Essays by Henry Thomas Buckle." As a means whereby a woman may +become convinced that her sex has a place in the intellectual universe, +this little essay is almost indispensable. Nothing else quite takes its +place.</p> + +<p>Darwin and Huxley seem to make woman simply a lesser man, weaker in +body and mind,--an affectionate and docile animal, of inferior grade. That +there is any aim in the distinction of the sexes, beyond the perpetuation +of the race, is nowhere recognized by them, so far as I know. That there +is anything in the intellectual sphere to correspond to the physical +difference; that here also the sexes are equal yet diverse, and each the +natural completion and complement of the other,--this neither Huxley nor +Darwin explicitly recognizes. And with the utmost admiration for their +great teachings in other ways, I must think that here they are open to the +suspicion of narrowness.</p> + +<p>Huxley wrote in "The Reader," in 1864, a short paper called +"Emancipation--Black and White," in which, while taking generous ground in +behalf of the legal and political position of woman, he yet does it +pityingly, <i>de haut en bas</i>, as for a creature hopelessly inferior, +and so heavily weighted already by her sex that she should be spared all +further trials. Speaking through an imaginary critic, who seems to +represent himself, he denies "even the natural equality of the sexes," and +declares "that in every excellent character, whether mental or physical, +the average woman is inferior to the average man, in the sense of having +that character less in quantity and lower in quality." Finally he goes so +far as "to defend the startling paradox that even in physical beauty man +is the superior." He admits that for a brief period of early youth the +case may be doubtful, but claims that after thirty the superior beauty of +man is unquestionable. Thus reasons Huxley; the whole essay being included +in his volume of "Lay Sermons, Addresses, and Reviews." [1]</p> + +<p>Darwin's best statements on the subject may be found in his "Descent of +Man."[2] He is, as usual, more moderate and guarded than Huxley. He says, +for instance: "It is generally admitted that with women the powers of +intuition, of rapid perception, and perhaps of imitation, are more +strongly marked than in man; but some, at least, of these faculties are +characteristic of the lower races, and therefore of a past and lower state +of civilization." Then he passes to the usual assertion that man has thus +far attained to a higher eminence than woman. "If two lists were made of +the most eminent men and women in poetry, painting, sculpture, music,-- +comprising composition and performance,--history, science, and philosophy, +with half a dozen names under each subject, the two lists would not bear +comparison." But the obvious answer, that nearly every name on his list, +upon the masculine side, would probably be taken from periods when woman +was excluded from any fair competition,--this he does not seem to +recognize at all. Darwin, of all men, must admit that superior merit +generally arrives later, not earlier, on the scene; and the question for +him to answer is, not whether woman equalled man in the first stages of +the intellectual "struggle for life," but whether she is not gaining on +him now.</p> + +<p>If, in spite of man's enormous advantage in the start, woman is already +overtaking his very best performances in several of the highest +intellectual departments,--as, for instance, prose fiction and dramatic +representation,--then it is mere dogmatism in Mr. Darwin to deny that she +may yet do the same in other departments. We in this generation have +actually seen this success achieved by Rachel and Ristori in the one art, +by "George Sand" and "George Eliot" in the other. Woman is, then, visibly +gaining on man in the sphere of intellect; and, if so, Mr. Darwin, at +least, must accept the inevitable inference.</p> + +<p>But this is arguing the question on the superficial facts merely. +Buckle goes deeper, and looks to principles. That superior quickness of +women, which Darwin dismisses so lightly as something belonging to savage +epochs, is to Buckle the sign of a quality which he holds essential, not +only to literature and art, but to science itself. Go among ignorant +women, he says, and you will find them more quick and intelligent than +equally ignorant men. A woman will usually tell you the way in the street +more readily than a man can; a woman can always understand a foreigner +more easily; and Dr. Currie says in his letters, that when a laborer and +his wife came to consult him, the man always got all the information from +the wife. Buckle illustrates this at some length, and points out that a +woman's mind is by its nature deductive and quick; a man's mind, inductive +and slow; that each has its value, and that science profoundly needs +both.</p> + +<p>"I will endeavor," he says, "to establish two propositions. First, that +women naturally prefer the deductive method to the inductive. Secondly, +that women, by encouraging in men deductive habits of thought, have +rendered an immense though unconscious service to the progress of science, +by preventing scientific investigators from being as exclusively inductive +as they would otherwise be."</p> + +<p>Then he shows that the most important scientific discoveries of modern +times--as of the law of gravitation by Newton, the law of the forms of +crystals by Haüy, and the metamorphosis of plants by Goethe--were all +essentially the results of that <i>a priori</i> or deductive method +"which, during the last two centuries, Englishmen have unwisely despised." +They were all the work, in a manner, of the imagination,--of the intuitive +or womanly quality of mind. And nothing can be finer or truer than the +words in which Buckle predicts the benefits that are to come from the +intellectual union of the sexes for the work of the future. "In that field +which we and our posterity have yet to traverse, I firmly believe that the +imagination will effect quite as much as the understanding. Our poetry +will have to reinforce our logic, and we must feel quite as much as we +must argue. Let us, then, hope that the imaginative and emotional minds of +one sex will continue to accelerate the great progress by acting upon and +improving the colder and harder minds of the other sex. By this coalition, +by this union of different faculties, different tastes, and different +methods, we shall go on our way with the greater ease."</p> + +<p>[Footnote 1: Pp. 22, 23, Am. ed.]</p> + +<p>[Footnote 2: Vol. ii. p. 311, Am. ed]</p> + +<h2><a name="2-3"></a><a href="#TOC">THE SPIRIT OF SMALL TYRANNY</a></h2> + +<p>When Mr. John Smauker and the Bath footmen invited Sam Weller to their +"swarry," consisting of a boiled leg of mutton, each guest had some +expression of contempt and wrath for the humble little green-grocer who +served them,--"in the true spirit," Dickens says, "of the very smallest +tyranny." The very fact that they were subject to being ordered about in +their own persons gave them a peculiar delight in issuing tyrannical +orders to others: just as sophomores in college torment freshmen because +other sophomores once teased the present tormentors themselves; and +Irishmen denounce the Chinese for underbidding them in the labor market, +precisely as they were themselves denounced by native-born Americans +thirty years ago. So it has sometimes seemed to me that the men whose own +positions and claims are really least commanding are those who hold most +resolutely that women should be kept in their proper place of +subordination.</p> + +<p>A friend of mine maintains the theory that men large and strong in +person are constitutionally inclined to do justice to women, as fearing no +competition from them in the way of bodily strength; but that small and +weak men are apt to be vehemently opposed to anything like equality in the +sexes. He quotes in defence of his theory the big soldier in London who +justified himself for allowing his little wife to chastise him, on the +ground that it pleased her and did not hurt him; and on the other hand +cites the extreme domestic tyranny of the dwarf Quilp. He declares that in +any difficult excursion among woods and mountains, the guides and the +able-bodied men are often willing to have women join the party, while it +is sure to be opposed by those who doubt their own strength or are +reluctant to display their weakness. It is not necessary to go so far as +my friend goes; but many will remember some fact of this kind, making such +theories appear not quite so absurd as at first.</p> + +<p>Thus it seems from the "Life and Letters" of Sydney Dobell, the English +poet, that he was opposed both to woman suffrage and woman authorship, +believing the movement for the former to be a "blundering on to the +perdition of womanhood." It appears that against all authorship by women +his convictions yearly grew stronger, he regarding it as "an error and an +anomaly." It seems quite in accordance with my friend's theory to hear, +after this, that Sydney Dobell was slight in person and a lifelong +invalid; nor is it surprising, on the same theory, that his poetry took no +deep root, and that it will not be likely to survive long, except perhaps +in his weird ballad of "Ravelston." But he represents a large class of +masculine intellects, of secondary and mediocre quality, whose opinions on +this subject are not so much opinions as instinctive prejudices against a +competitor who may turn out their superior. Whether they know it, or not, +their aversion to the authorship of women is very much like the conviction +of a weak pedestrian, that women are not naturally fitted to take long +walks; or the opinion of a man whose own accounts are in a muddle, that +his wife is constitutionally unfitted to understand business.</p> + +<p>It is a pity to praise either sex at the expense of the other. The +social inequality of the sexes was not produced so much by the voluntary +tyranny of man, as by his great practical advantage at the outset; human +history necessarily beginning with a period when physical strength was +sole ruler. It is unnecessary, too, to consider in how many cases women +may have justified this distrust; and may have made themselves as +obnoxious as Horace Walpole's maids of honor, whose coachman left his +savings to his son on condition that he should never marry a maid of +honor. But it is safe to say that on the whole the feeling of contempt for +women, and the love to exercise arbitrary power over them, is the survival +of a crude impulse which the world is outgrowing, and which is in general +least obvious in the manliest men. That clear and able English writer, +Walter Bagehot, well describes "the contempt for physical weakness and for +women which marks early society. The non-combatant population is sure to +fare ill during the ages of combat. But these defects, too, are cured or +lessened; women have now marvellous means of winning their way in the +world; and mind without muscle has far greater force than muscle without +mind." [1]</p> + +<p>[Footnote 1: <i>Physics and Politics</i>, p. 79.]</p> + +<h2><a name="2-4"></a><a href="#TOC">THE NOBLE SEX</a></h2> + +<p>A highly educated American woman of my acquaintance once employed a +French tutor in Paris to assist her in teaching Latin to her little +grandson. The Frenchman brought with him a Latin grammar, written in his +own language, with which my friend was quite pleased, until she came to a +passage relating to the masculine gender in nouns, and claiming +grammatical precedence for it on the ground that the male sex is the noble +sex,--"<i>le sexe noble</i>." "Upon that," she said, "I burst forth in +indignation, and the poor teacher soon retired. But I do not believe," she +added, "that the Frenchman has the slightest conception, up to this +moment, of what I could find in that phrase to displease me."</p> + +<p>I do not suppose he could. From the time when the Salic Law set French +women aside from the royal succession, on the ground that the kingdom of +France was "too noble to be ruled by a woman," the claim of nobility has +been all on one side. The State has strengthened the Church in this +theory, the Church has strengthened the State; and the result of all is, +that French grammarians follow both these high authorities. When even the +good Père Hyacinthe teaches, through the New York "Independent," +that the husband is to direct the conscience of his wife, precisely as the +father directs that of his child, what higher philosophy can you expect of +any Frenchman than to maintain the claims of "<i>le sexe noble</i>"?</p> + +<p>We see the consequence, even among the most heterodox Frenchmen. +Rejecting all other precedents and authorities, the poor Communists still +held to this. Consider, for instance, this translation of a marriage +contract under the Commune, which lately came to light in a trial reported +in the "Gazette des Tribunaux:"--</p> + +<blockquote> +<p align="center">FRENCH REPUBLIC.</p> + +<p>The citizen Anet, son of Jean Louis Anet, and the <i>citoyenne</i> +Maria Saint; she engaged to follow the said citizen everywhere and to love +him always.-- ANET. MARIA SAINT.</p> + +<p>Witnessed by the under-mentioned citizen and +<i>citoyenne.</i>--FOURIER. LAROCHE.</p> + +<p>PARIS, April 22, 1871.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>What a comfortable arrangement is this! Poor <i>citoyenne</i> Maria +Saint, even when all human laws have suspended their action, still holds +by her grammar, still must annex herself to <i>le sexe noble</i>. She +still must follow citizen Anet as the feminine pronoun follows the +masculine, or as a verb agrees with its nominative case in number and in +person. But with what a lordly freedom from all obligation does citizen +Anet, representative of this nobility of sex, accept the allegiance! The +citizeness may "follow him," certainly,--so long as she is not in the +way,--and she must "love him always;" but he is not bound. Why should he +be? It would be quite ungrammatical.</p> + +<p>Yet, after all is said and done, there is a brutal honesty in this +frank subordination of the woman according to the grammar. It has the same +merit with the old Russian marriage consecration: "Here, wolf, take thy +lamb," which at least put the thing clearly, and made no nonsense about +it. I do not know that anywhere in France the wedding ritual is now so +severely simple as this, but I know that in some French villages the bride +is still married in a mourning-gown. I should think she would be.</p> + +<h2><a name="2-5"></a><a href="#TOC">THE TRUTH ABOUT OUR +GRANDMOTHERS</a></h2> + +<p>Every young woman of the present generation, so soon as she ventures to +have a headache or a set of nerves, is immediately confronted by indignant +critics with her grandmother. If the grandmother is living, the fact of +her existence is appealed to: if there is only a departed grandmother to +remember, the maiden is confronted with a ghost. That ghost is endowed +with as many excellences as those with which Miss Betsey Trotwood endowed +the niece that never had been born; and just as David Copperfield was +reproached with the virtues of his unborn sister who "would never have run +away," so that granddaughter with the headache is reproached with the +ghostly perfections of her grandmother, who never had a headache--or, if +she had, it is luckily forgotten. It is necessary to ask, sometimes, what +was really the truth about our grandmothers? Were they such models of +bodily perfection as is usually claimed?</p> + +<p>If we look at the early colonial days, we are at once met by the fact, +that although families were then often larger than is now common, yet this +phenomenon was by no means universal, and was balanced by a good many +childless homes. Of this any one can satisfy himself by looking over any +family history; and he can also satisfy himself of the fact,--first +pointed out, I believe, by Mrs. Ball,--that third and fourth marriages +were then obviously and unquestionably more common than now. The inference +would seem to be, that there is a little illusion about the health of +those days, as there is about the health of savage races. In both cases, +it is not so much that the average health is greater under rude social +conditions, as that these conditions kill off the weak, and leave only the +strong. Modern civilized society, on the other hand, preserves the health +of many men and women--and permits them to marry, and become parents--who +under the severities of savage life or of pioneer life would have died, +and given way to others.</p> + +<p>On this I will not dwell; because these primeval ladies were not +strictly our grandmothers, being farther removed. But of those who were +our grandmothers,--the women of the Revolutionary and post-Revolutionary +epochs,--we happen to have very definite physiological observations +recorded; not very flattering, it is true, but frank and searching. What +these good women are in the imagination of their descendants, we know. +Mrs. Stowe describes them as "the race of strong, hardy, cheerful girls +that used to grow up in country places, and made the bright, neat New +England kitchens of olden times;" and adds, "This race of women, pride of +olden time, is daily lessening; and in their stead come the fragile, +easily fatigued, languid girls of a modern age, drilled in book-learning, +ignorant of common things."</p> + +<p>What, now, was the testimony of those who saw our grandmothers in the +flesh? As it happens, there were a good many foreigners, generally +Frenchmen, who came to visit the new Republic during the presidency of +Washington. Let us take, for instance, the testimony of the two +following.</p> + +<p>The Abbé Robin was a chaplain in Rochambeau's army during the +Revolution, and wrote thus in regard to the American ladies in his +"Nouveau Voyage dans l'Amerique Septentrionale," published in 1782:--</p> + +<p>"They are tall and well-proportioned; their features are generally +regular; their complexions are generally fair and without color.... At +twenty years of age the women have no longer the freshness of youth. At +thirty-five or forty they are wrinkled and decrepit. The men are almost as +premature."</p> + +<p>Again: The Chevalier Louis Félix de Beaujour lived in the United +States from 1804 to 1814, as consul-general and <i>chargé +d'affaires;</i> and wrote a book, immediately after, which was translated +into English under the title, "A Sketch of the United States at the +Commencement of the Present Century." In this he thus describes American +women:--</p> + +<p>"The women have more of that delicate beauty which belongs to their +sex, and in general have finer features and more expression in their +physiognomy. Their stature is usually tall, and nearly all are possessed +of a light and airy shape,--the breast high, a fine head, and their color +of a dazzling whiteness. Let us imagine, under this brilliant form, the +most modest demeanor, a chaste and virginal air, accompanied by those +single and unaffected graces which flow from artless nature, and we may +have an idea of their beauty; but this beauty fades and passes in a +moment. At the age of twenty-five their form changes, and at thirty the +whole of their charms have disappeared."</p> + +<p>These statements bring out a class of facts, which, as it seems to me, +are singularly ignored by some of our physiologists. They indicate that +the modification of the American type began early, and was, as a rule, due +to causes antedating the fashions or studies of the present day. Here are +our grandmothers and great-grandmothers as they were actually seen by the +eyes of impartial or even flattering critics. These critics were not +Englishmen, accustomed to a robust and ruddy type of women, but Frenchmen, +used to a type more like the American. They were not mere hasty +travellers; for the one lived here ten years, and the other was stationed +for some time at Newport, R.I., in a healthy locality, noted in those days +for the beauty of its women. Yet we find it their verdict upon these +grandmothers of nearly a hundred years ago, that they showed the same +delicate beauty, the same slenderness, the same pallor, the same +fragility, the same early decline, with which their granddaughters are now +reproached.</p> + +<p>In some respects, probably, the physical habits of the grandmothers +were better: but an examination of their portraits will satisfy any one +that they laced more tightly than their descendants, and wore their +dresses lower in the neck; and as for their diet, we have the testimony of +another French traveller, Volney, who was in America from 1795 to 1798, +that "if a premium were offered for a regimen most destructive to the +teeth, the stomach, and the health in general, none could be devised more +efficacious for these ends than that in use among this people." And he +goes on to give particulars, showing a far worse condition in respect to +cookery and diet than now prevails in any decent American society.</p> + +<p>We have therefore strong evidence that the essential change in the +American type was effected in the last century, not in this. Dr. E.H. +Clarke says, "A century does not afford a period long enough for the +production of great changes. That length of time could not transform the +sturdy German <i>fräulein</i> and robust English damsel into the +fragile American miss." And yet it is pretty clear that the first century +and a half of our colonial life had done just this for our grandmothers. +And, if so, our physiologists ought to conform their theories to the +facts.</p> + +<h2><a name="2-6"></a><a href="#TOC">THE PHYSIQUE OF AMERICAN +WOMEN</a></h2> + +<p>I was talking the other day with a New York physician, long retired +from practice, who after an absence of a dozen years in Europe has +returned within a year to this country. He volunteered the remark, that +nothing had so impressed him since his return as the improved health of +Americans. He said that his wife had been equally struck with it; and that +they had noticed it especially among the inhabitants of cities, among the +more cultivated classes, and in particular among women.</p> + +<p>It so happened, that within twenty-four hours almost precisely the same +remark was made to me by another gentleman of unusually cosmopolitan +experience, and past middle age. He further fortified himself by a similar +assertion made him by Charles Dickens, in comparing his second visit to +this country with his first. In answer to an inquiry as to what points of +difference had most impressed him, Dickens said, "Your people, especially +the women, look better fed than formerly."</p> + +<p>It is possible that in all these cases the witnesses may have been led +to exaggerate the original evil, while absent from the country, and so may +have felt some undue reaction on their arrival. One of my informants went +so far as to express confidence that among his circle of friends in Boston +and in London a dinner party of half a dozen Americans would outweigh an +English party of the same number. Granting this to be too bold a +statement, and granting the unscientific nature of all these assertions, +they still indicate a probability of their own truth until refuted by +facts on the other side. They are further corroborated by the surprise +expressed by Huxley and some other recent Englishmen at finding us a race +more substantial than they had supposed.</p> + +<p>The truth seems to be, that Nature is endeavoring to take a new +departure in the American, and to produce a race more finely organized, +more sensitive, more pliable, and of more nervous energy, than the races +of Northern Europe; that this change of type involves some risk to health +in the process, but promises greater results whenever the new type shall +be established. I am confident that there has been within the last +half-century a great improvement in the physical habits of the more +cultivated classes, at least, in this country,--better food, better air, +better habits as to bathing and exercise. The great increase of athletic +games; the greatly increased proportion of seaside and mountain life in +summer; the thicker shoes and boots of women and little girls, permitting +them to go out more freely in all weathers,--these are among the permanent +gains. The increased habit of dining late, and of taking only a lunch at +noon, is of itself an enormous gain to the professional and mercantile +classes, because it secures time for eating and for digestion. Even the +furnaces in houses, which seemed at first so destructive to the very +breath of life, turn out to have given a new lease to it; and open fires +are being rapidly reintroduced as a provision for enjoyment and health, +when the main body of the house has been tempered by the furnace. There +has been, furthermore, a decided improvement in the bread of the +community, and a very general introduction of other farinaceous food. All +this has happened within my own memory, and gives <i>a priori</i> +probability to the alleged improvement in physical condition within twenty +years.</p> + +<p>And, if these reasonings are still insufficient on the one side, it +must be remembered that the facts of the census are almost equally +inadequate when quoted on the other. If, for instance, all the young +people of a New Hampshire village take a fancy to remove to Wisconsin, it +does not show that the race is dying out because their children swell the +birth-rate of Wisconsin instead of New Hampshire. If in a given city the +births among the foreign-born population are twice as many in proportion +as among the American, we have not the whole story until we learn whether +the deaths are not twice as many also. If so, the inference is that the +same recklessness brought the children into the world and sent them out of +it; and no physiological inference whatever can be drawn. It was clearly +established by the medical commission of the Boston Board of Health, a few +years ago, that "the general mortality of the foreign element is much +greater than that of the native element of our population." "This is found +to be the case," they add, "throughout the United States as well as in +Boston."</p> + +<p>So far as I can judge, all our physiological tendencies are favorable +rather than otherwise: and the transplantation of the English race seems +now likely to end in no deterioration, but in a type more finely +organized, and more comprehensive and cosmopolitan; and this without loss +of health, of longevity, or of physical size and weight. And, if this is +to hold true, it must be true not only of men, but of women.</p> + +<h2><a name="2-7"></a><a href="#TOC">THE LIMITATIONS OF SEX</a></h2> + +<p>Are there any inevitable limitations of sex?</p> + +<p>Some reformers, apparently, think that there are not, and that the best +way to help woman is to deny the fact of limitations. But I think the +great majority of reformers would take a different ground, and would say +that the two sexes are mutually limited by nature. They would doubtless +add that this very fact is an argument for the enfranchisement of woman: +for, if woman is a mere duplicate of man, man can represent her; but if +she has traits of her own, absolutely distinct from his, then he cannot +represent her, and she should have a voice and a vote of her own.</p> + +<p>To this last body of believers I belong. I think that all legal or +conventional obstacles should be removed, which debar woman from +determining for herself, as freely as man determines, what the real +limitations of sex are, and what restrictions are merely conventional. +But, when all is said and done, there is no doubt that plenty of +limitations will remain on both sides.</p> + +<p>That man has such limitations is clear. No matter how finely organized +he may be, how sympathetic, how tender, how loving, there is yet a +barrier, never to be passed, that separates him from the most precious +part of the woman's kingdom. All the wondrous world of motherhood, with +its unspeakable delights, its holy of holies, remains forever unknown by +him; he may gaze, but never enter. That halo of pure devotion, which makes +a Madonna out of so many a poor and ignorant woman, can never touch his +brow. Many a man loves children more than many a woman: but, after all, it +is not he who has borne them; to that peculiar sacredness of experience he +can never arrive. But never mind whether the loss be a great one or a +small one: it is distinctly a limitation; and to every loving mother it is +a limitation so important that she would be unable to weigh all the +privileges and powers of manhood against this peculiar possession of her +child.</p> + +<p>Now, if this be true, and if man be thus distinctly limited by the mere +fact of sex, can the woman complain that she also should have some natural +limitations? Grant that she should have no unnecessary restrictions; and +that the course of human progress is constantly setting aside, as +unnecessary, point after point that was once held essential. Still, if she +finds--as she undoubtedly will find--that some natural barriers and +hindrances remain at last, and that she can no more do man's whole work in +the world than he can do hers, why should she complain? If he can accept +his limitations, she must be prepared also to accept hers.</p> + +<p>Some of our physiological reformers, declare that a girl will be +perfectly healthy if she can only be sensibly dressed, and can "have just +as much outdoor exercise as the boys, and of the same sort, if she choose +it." But I have observed that matter a good deal, and have watched the +effect of boyish exercise on a good many girls; and I am satisfied that so +far from being safely turned loose, as boys can be, they need, for +physical health, the constant supervision of wise mothers. Otherwise the +very exposure that only hardens the boy may make the girl an invalid for +life. The danger comes from a greater sensitiveness of structure,--not +weakness, properly so called, since it gives, in certain ways, more power +of endurance,--a greater sensitiveness which runs through all a woman's +career, and is the expensive price she pays for the divine destiny of +motherhood. It is another natural limitation.</p> + +<p>No wise person believes in any "reform against Nature," or that we can +get beyond the laws of Nature. If I believed the limitations of sex to be +inconsistent with woman suffrage for instance, I should oppose it; but I +do not see why a woman cannot form political opinions by her baby's +cradle, as well as her husband in his workshop, while her very love for +the child commits her to an interest in good government. Our duty is to +remove all the artificial restrictions we can. That done, it will not be +hard for man or woman to acquiesce in the natural limitations.</p> + +<center> +<hr class="narrow"> +</center> +<h2 align="center"><a name="3"></a><a href="#TOC">III<br> + TEMPERAMENT</a></h2> + +<blockquote> +<p>[Greek: 'Andros kai gunaikos ae autae antae aretae.]--ANTISTHENES in +Diogenes Laertius, vi. i, 5.</p> + +<p align="center">"Virtue in man and woman is the same."</p> +</blockquote> + +<p> </p> + +<h2><a name="3-1"></a><a href="#TOC">THE INVISIBLE LADY</a></h2> + +<p>The Invisible Lady, as advertised in all our cities a good many years +ago, was a mysterious individual who remained unseen, and had apparently +no human organs except a brain and a tongue. You asked questions of her, +and she made intelligent answers; but where she was, you could no more +discover than you could find the man inside the Automaton Chess-Player. +Was she intended as a satire on womankind, or as a sincere representation +of what womankind should be? To many men, doubtless, she would have seemed +the ideal of her sex, could only her brain and tongue have disappeared +like the rest of her faculties. Such men would have liked her almost as +well as that other mysterious personage on the London signboard, labelled +"The Good Woman," and represented by a female figure without a head.</p> + +<p>It is not that any considerable portion of mankind actually wishes to +abolish woman from the universe. But the opinion dies hard that she is +best off when least visible. These appeals which still meet us for "the +sacred privacy of woman" are only the Invisible Lady on a larger scale. In +ancient Boeotia, brides were carried home in vehicles whose wheels were +burned at the door in token that they would never again be needed. In +ancient Rome, it was a queen's epitaph, "She stayed at home, and +spun,"--<i>Domum servavit, lanam fecit</i>. In Turkey, not even the +officers of justice can enter the apartments of a woman without her lord's +consent. In Spain and Spanish America, the veil replaces the four walls of +the house, and is a portable seclusion. To be visible is at best a sign of +peasant blood and occupations; to be high-bred is to be invisible.</p> + +<p>In the Azores I found that each peasant family endeavored to secure for +one or more of its daughters the pride and glory of living unseen. The +other sisters, secure in innocence, tended cattle on lonely +mountain-sides, or toiled bare-legged up the steep ascents, their heads +crowned with orange-baskets. The chosen sister was taught to read, to +embroider, and to dwell indoors; if she went out it was only under escort, +and with her face buried in a hood of almost incredible size, affording +only a glimpse of the poor pale cheeks, quite unlike the rosy vigor of the +damsels on the mountain-side. The girls, I was told, did not covet this +privilege of seclusion; but let us be genteel, or die.</p> + +<p>Now all that is left of the Invisible Lady among ourselves is only the +remnant of this absurd tradition. In the seaside town where I write, +ladies of fashion usually go veiled in the streets, and so general is the +practice that little girls often veil their dolls. They all suppose it to +be done for complexion or for ornament; just as people still hang straps +on the backs of their carriages, not knowing that it is a relic of the +days when footmen stood there and held on. But the veil represents a +tradition of seclusion, whether we know it or not; and the dread of +hearing a woman speak in public, or of seeing a woman vote, represents +precisely the same tradition. It is entitled to no less respect, and no +more.</p> + +<p>Like all traditions, it finds something in human nature to which to +attach itself. Early girlhood, like early boyhood, needs to be guarded and +sheltered, that it may mature unharmed. It is monstrous to make this an +excuse for keeping a woman, any more than a man, in a condition of +perpetual subordination and seclusion. The young lover wishes to lock up +his angel in a little world of her own, where none may intrude. The harem +and the seraglio are simply the embodiment of this desire. But the maturer +man and the maturer race have found that the beloved being should be +something more.</p> + +<p>After this discovery is made, the theory of the Invisible Lady +disappears. It is less of a shock for an American to hear a woman speak in +public than it is for an Oriental to see her show her face in public at +all. Once open the door of the harem, and she has the freedom of the +house: the house includes the front door, and the street is but a +prolonged doorstep. With the freedom of the street comes inevitably a free +access to the platform, the tribunal, and the pulpit. You might as well +try to stop the air in its escape from a punctured balloon, as to try, +when woman is once out of the harem, to put her back there. Ceasing to be +an Invisible Lady, she must become a visible force: there is no middle +ground. There is no danger that she will not be anchored to the cradle, +when cradle there is; but it will be by an elastic cable, that will leave +her as free to think and vote as to pray. No woman is less a mother +because she cares for all the concerns of the world into which her child +is born. It was John Quincy Adams who said, defending the political +petitions of the women of Plymouth, that "women are not only justified, +but exhibit the most exalted virtue, when they do depart from the domestic +circle, and enter on the concerns of their country, of humanity, and of +their God."</p> + +<h2><a name="3-2"></a><a href="#TOC">SACRED OBSCURITY</a></h2> + +<p>In the preface to that ill-named but delightful book, the "Remains of +the late Mrs. Richard Trench," there is a singular remark by the editor, +her son. He says that "the adage is certainly true in regard to the +British matron, <i>Bene vixit quae bene latuit,</i>" the meaning of this +phrase being, "She has lived well who has kept herself well out of sight." +Applying this to his beloved mother, he further expresses a regret at +disturbing her "sacred obscurity." Then he goes on to disturb it pretty +effectually by printing a thick octavo volume of her most private +letters.</p> + +<p>It is a great source of strength and advantage to reformers, that there +are always men preserved to be living examples of this good old Oriental +doctrine of "sacred obscurity." Just as Mr. Darwin needs for the +demonstration of his theory that the lower orders of creation should still +be present in visible form for purposes of comparison, so every reformer +needs to fortify his position by showing examples of the original attitude +from which society has been gradually emerging. If there had been no +Oriental seclusion, many things in the present position of woman would be +inexplicable. But when we point to that; when we show that even in the +more enlightened Eastern countries it is still held indecorous to allude +to the feminine members of a man's family; when we see among the Christian +nations of Southern Europe many lingering traits of this same habit of +seclusion; and when we find an archdeacon of the English Church still +clinging to the theory, even while exhibiting his mother's family letters +to the whole world,--we more easily understand the course of +development.</p> + +<p>These reassertions of the Oriental theory are simply reversions, as a +naturalist would say, to the original type. They are instances of +"atavism," like the occasional appearance of six fingers on one hand in a +family where the great-great-grandfather happened to possess that +ornament. Such instances can always be found, when one takes the pains to +look for them. Thus a critic, discussing in the "Atlantic Monthly" Mr. +Mahaffy's book on "Social Life in Greece," is surprised that this writer +should quote, in proof of the degradation of woman in Athens, the remark +attributed to Pericles, "That woman is best who is least spoken of among +men, whether for good or for evil." "In our opinion," adds the reviewer, +"that remark was wise then, and is wise now." The Oriental theory is not +then, it seems, extinct; and we are spared the pains of proving that it +ever existed.</p> + +<p>If this theory be true, how falsely has the admiration of mankind been +given! If the most obscure woman is best, the most conspicuous must +undoubtedly be worst. Tried by this standard, how unworthy must have been +Elizabeth Barrett Browning, how reprehensible must be Dorothea Dix, what a +model of all that is discreditable is Rosa Bonheur, what a crowning +instance of human depravity is Florence Nightingale! Yet how consoling the +thought, that, while these disreputable persons were thus wasting their +substance in the riotous performance of what the world weakly styled good +deeds, there were always women who saw the folly of such efforts; women +who by steady devotion to eating, drinking, and sleeping continued to keep +themselves in sacred obscurity, and to prove themselves the ornaments of +their sex, inasmuch as no human being ever had occasion to mention their +names!</p> + +<p>But alas for human inconsistency! As for this inverse-ratio +theory,--this theory of virtue so exalted that it has never been known or +felt or mentioned among men,--it is to be observed that those who hold it +are the first to desert it when stirred by an immediate occasion. Just as +a slaveholder, in the old times, after demonstrating to you that freedom +was a curse to the negro, would instantly turn round, and inflict this +greatest of all curses on some slave who had saved his life; so, I fear, +would one of these philosophers, if he were profoundly impressed with any +great action done by a woman, give the lie to all his theories, and +celebrate her fame. In spite of all his fine principles, if he happened to +be rescued from drowning by Grace Darling, he would put her name in the +newspaper; if he were tended in hospital by Clara Barton, he would sound +her praise; and if his mother wrote as good letters as did Mrs. Trench, he +would probably print them to the extent of five hundred pages, as the +archdeacon did, and all his gospel of silence would exhale itself in a +single sigh of regret in the preface.</p> + +<h2><a name="3-3"></a><a href="#TOC">VIRTUES IN COMMON</a></h2> + +<p>A young friend of mine, who was educated at one of the very best +schools for girls in New York city, told me that one day her teacher +requested the older girls to write out a list of virtues suitable to manly +character, which they did. A month or more later, when this occurrence was +well forgotten, the same teacher bade them write out a list of womanly +virtues, she making no reference to the other list. Then she made each +girl compare her lists; and they all found with surprise that there was no +substantial difference between them. The only variation, in most cases, +was, that they had put in a rather vague special virtue of "manliness" in +the one case, and "womanliness" in the other; a sort of miscellaneous +department or "odd drawer," apparently, in which to group all traits not +easily analyzed.</p> + +<p>The moral is that, as tested by the common sense of these young people, +duty is duty, and the difference between ethics for men and ethics for +women lies simply in practical applications, not in principles.</p> + +<p>Who can deny that the philosopher Antisthenes was right when he said, +"The virtues of the man and the woman are the same"? Not the Christian, +certainly; for he accepts as his highest standard the being who in all +history best united the highest qualities of both sexes. Not the +metaphysician; for his analysis deals with the human mind as such, not +with the mind of either sex. Not the evolutionist; for he is accustomed to +trace back qualities to their source, and cannot deny that there is in +each sex at least a "survival" of every good and every bad trait. We may +say that these qualities are, or may be, or ought to be, distributed +unequally between the sexes; but we cannot reasonably deny that each sex +possesses a share of every quality, and that what is good in one sex is +also good in the other. Man may be the braver, and yet courage in a woman +may be nobler than cowardice. Woman may be the purer, and yet purity may +be noble in a man.</p> + +<p>So clear is this, that some of the very coarsest writers in all +literature, and those who have been severest upon women, have yet been +obliged to acknowledge it. Take, for instance, Dean Swift, who +writes:--</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>"I am ignorant of any one quality that is amiable in a woman, which is +not equally so in a man. I do not except even modesty and gentleness of +nature; nor do I know one vice or folly which is not equally detestable in +both."</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>Mrs. Jameson, in her delightful "Commonplace Book," illustrates this +admirably by one or two test cases. She takes, for instance, from one of +Humboldt's letters a much-admired passage on manly character:--</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>"Masculine independence of mind I hold to be in reality the first +requisite for the formation of a character of real manly worth. The man +who allows himself to be deceived and carried away by his own weakness may +be a very amiable person in other respects, but cannot be called a good +man: such beings should not find favor in the eyes of a woman, for a truly +beautiful and purely feminine nature should be attracted only by what is +highest and noblest in the character of man."</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>"Take now this same bit of moral philosophy," she says, "and apply it +to the feminine character, and it reads quite as well:--</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>"'Feminine independence of mind I hold to be in reality the first +requisite for the formation of a character of real feminine worth. The +woman who allows herself to be deceived and carried away by her own +weakness may be a very amiable person in other respects, but cannot be +called a good woman; such beings should not find favor in the eyes of a +man, for a truly beautiful and purely manly nature should be attracted +only by what is highest and noblest in the character of woman.'"</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>I have never been able to perceive that there was a quality or grace of +character which really belonged exclusively to either sex, or which failed +to win honor when wisely exercised by either. It is not thought necessary +to have separate editions of books on ethical science, the one for man, +the other for woman, like almanacs calculated for different latitudes. The +books that vary are not the scientific works, but little manuals of +practical application,--"Duties of Men," "Duties of Women." These vary +with times and places: where women do not know how to read, no advice on +reading will be found in the women's manuals; where it is held wrong for +women to uncover the face, it will be laid down in these manuals as a sin. +But ethics are ethics: the great principles of morals, as proclaimed +either by science or by religion, do not fluctuate for sex; their basis is +in the very foundations of right itself.</p> + +<p>This grows clearer when we remember that it is equally true in mental +science. There is not one logic for men, and another for women; a separate +syllogism, a separate induction: the moment we begin to state intellectual +principles, that moment we go beyond sex. We deal then with absolute +truth. If an observation is wrong, if a process of reasoning is bad, it +makes no difference who brings it forward. Any list of mental processes, +any inventory of the contents of the mind, would be identical, so far as +sex goes, whether compiled by a woman or a man. These things, like the +circulation of the blood or the digestion of food, belong clearly to the +ground held in common. The London "Spectator" well said some time +since,--</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>"After all, knowledge is knowledge; and there is no more a specifically +feminine way of describing correctly the origin of the Lollard movement, +or the character of Spenser's poetry, than there is a specifically +feminine way of solving a quadratic equation, or of proving the +forty-seventh problem of Euclid's first book."</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>All we can say in modification of this is, that there is, after all, a +foundation for the rather vague item of "manliness" and "womanliness" in +these schoolgirl lists of duties. There is a difference, after all is said +and done; but it is something that eludes analysis, like the differing +perfume of two flowers of the same genus and even of the same species. The +method of thought must be essentially the same in both sexes; and yet an +average woman will put more flavor of something we call instinct into her +mental action, and the average man something more of what we call logic +into his. Whipple tells us that not a man guessed the plot of Dickens's +"Great Expectations," while many women did; and this certainly indicates +some average difference of quality or method. So the average opinions of a +hundred women, on some question of ethics, might very probably differ from +the average of a hundred men, while it yet remains true that "the virtues +of the man and the woman are the same."</p> + +<h2><a name="3-4"></a><a href="#TOC">INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES</a></h2> + +<p>Blackburn, in his entertaining book, "Artists and Arabs," draws a +contrast between Frith's painting of the "Derby Day" and Rosa Bonheur's +"Horse Fair,"--"the former pleasing the eye by its cleverness and +prettiness, the latter impressing the spectator by its power and its +truthful rendering of animal life. The difference between the two painters +is probably more one of education than of natural gifts. But whilst the +style of the former is grafted on a fashion, the latter is founded on a +rock,--the result of a close study of nature, chastened by classic feeling +and a remembrance, it may be, of the friezes of the Parthenon."</p> + +<p>Now it is to be observed that this description runs precisely counter +to the popular impression as to the work of the two sexes. Novelists like +Charles Reade, for instance, who have apparently seen precisely one woman +in their lives, and hardly more than one man, and who keep on sketching +these two figures most felicitously and brilliantly thenceforward, would +be apt to assign these qualities of the artist very differently. Their +typical man would do the truthful and powerful work, and everybody would +say, "How manly!" Their woman would please by cleverness and prettiness, +and everybody would say, "How womanly!" Yet Blackburn shows us that these +qualities are individual, not sexual; that they result from temperament, +or, he thinks, still more from training. If Rosa Bonheur does better work +than Frith, it is not because she is a woman, nor is it in spite of that; +but because, setting sex aside, she is a better artist.</p> + +<p>This is not denying the distinctions of sex, but only asserting that +they are not so exclusive and all-absorbing as is supposed. It is easy to +name other grounds of difference which entirely ignore those of sex, +striking directly across them, and rendering a different classification +necessary. It is thus with distinctions of race or color, for instance. An +Indian man and woman are at many points more like to each other than is +either to a white person of the same sex. A black-haired man and woman, or +a fair-haired man and woman, are to be classified together in these +physiological aspects. So of differences of genius: a man and woman of +musical temperament and training have more in common than has either with +a person who is of the same sex, but who cannot tell one note from +another. So two persons of ardent or imaginative temperament are thus far +alike, though the gulf of sex divides them; and so are two persons of cold +or prosaic temperament. In a mixed school the teacher cannot class +together intellectually the boys as such, and the girls as such: bright +boys take hold of a lesson very much as bright girls do, and slow girls as +slow boys. Nature is too rich, too full, too varied, to be content with a +single basis of classification: she has a hundred systems of grouping, +according to sex, age, race, temperament, training, and so on; and we get +but a narrow view of life when we limit our theories to one set of +distinctions.</p> + +<p>As a matter of social philosophy, this train of thought logically leads +to coeducation, impartial suffrage, and free cooperation in all the +affairs of life. As a matter of individual duty, it teaches the old moral +to "act well your part." No wise person will ever trouble himself or +herself much about the limitations of sex in intellectual labor. Rosa +Bonheur was not trying to work like a woman, or like a man, or unlike +either, but to do her work thoroughly and well. He or she who works in +this spirit works nobly, and gives an example which will pass beyond the +bounds of sex, and help all. The Abbé Liszt, the most gifted of +modern pianists, told a friend of mine, his pupil, that he had learned +more of music from hearing Madame Malibran sing, than from anything else +whatever.</p> + +<h2><a name="3-5"></a><a href="#TOC">ANGELIC SUPERIORITY</a></h2> + +<p>It is better not to base any plea for woman on the ground of her +angelic superiority. The argument proves too much. If she is already so +perfect, there is every inducement to let well alone. It suggests the +expediency of conforming man's condition to hers, instead of conforming +hers to man's. If she is a winged creature, and man can only crawl, it is +his condition that needs mending.</p> + +<p>Besides, one may well be a little incredulous of these vast claims. +Granting some average advantage to woman, it is not of such completeness +as to base much argument upon it. The minister, looking on his +congregation, rarely sees an unmixed angel, either at the head or at the +foot of any pew. The domestic servant rarely has the felicity of waiting +on an absolute saint at either end of the dinner-table. The lady's-maid +has to compare her little observations of human infirmity with those of +the valet de chambre. The lover worships the beloved, whether man or +woman; but marriage bears rather hard on the ideal in either case; and +those who pray out of the same book, "Have mercy upon us, miserable +sinners," are not supposed to be offering up petitions for each other +only.</p> + +<p>We all know many women whose lives are made wretched by the sins and +follies of their husbands. There are also many men whose lives are turned +to long wretchedness by the selfishness, the worldliness, or the bad +temper of their wives. Domestic tyranny belongs to neither sex by +monopoly. If man tortures or depresses woman, she also has a fearful power +to corrupt and deprave man. On the other hand, to quote old Antisthenes +once more, "the virtues of the man and woman are the same." A refined man +is more refined than a coarse woman. A child-loving man is infinitely +tenderer and sweeter toward children than a hard and unsympathetic woman. +The very qualities that are claimed as distinctively feminine are +possessed more abundantly by many men than by many of what is called the +softer sex.</p> + +<p>Why is it necessary to say all this? Because there is always danger +that we who believe in the equality of the sexes should be led into +over-statements, which will react against ourselves. It is not safe to say +that the ballot-box would be reformed if intrusted to feminine votes +alone. Had the voters of the South been all women, it would have plunged +earlier into the gulf of secession, dived deeper, and come up even more +reluctantly. Were the women of Spain to rule its destinies unchecked, the +Pope would be its master, and the Inquisition might be reëstablished. +For all that we can see, the rule of women alone would be as bad as the +rule of men alone. It would be as unsafe to give women the absolute +control of man as to make man the master of woman.</p> + +<p>Let us be a shade more cautious in our reasonings. Woman needs equal +rights, not because she is man's better half, but because she is his other +half. She needs them, not as an angel, but as a fraction of humanity. Her +political education will not merely help man, but it will help herself. +She will sometimes be right in her opinions, and sometimes be altogether +wrong; but she will learn, as man learns, by her own blunders. The demand +in her behalf is that she shall have the opportunity to make mistakes, +since it is by that means she must become wise.</p> + +<p>In all our towns there is a tendency toward "mixed schools." We rarely +hear of the sexes being separated in a school after being once united; but +we constantly hear of their being brought together after separation. This +union is commonly, but mistakenly, recommended as an advantage to the boys +alone. I once heard an accomplished teacher remonstrate against this +change, when thus urged. "Why should my girls be sacrificed," she said, +"to improve your boys?" Six months after, she had learned by experience. +"Why," she asked, "did you rest the argument on so narrow a ground? Since +my school consisted half of boys, I find with surprise that the change has +improved both sexes. My girls are more ambitious, more obedient, and more +ladylike. I shall never distrust the policy of mixed schools again."</p> + +<p>What is true of the school is true of the family and of the state. It +is not good for man, or for woman, to be alone. Granting the woman to be, +on the whole, the more spiritually minded, it is still true that each sex +needs the other. When the rivet falls from a pair of scissors, we do not +have than mended because either half can claim angelic superiority over +the other half, but because it takes two halves to make a whole.</p> + +<h2><a name="3-6"></a><a href="#TOC">VICARIOUS HONORS</a></h2> + +<p>There is a story in circulation--possibly without authority--to the +effect that a certain young lady has ascended so many Alps that she would +have been chosen a member of the English Alpine Club but for her +misfortune in respect to sex. As a matter of personal recognition, +however, and, as it were, of approximate courtesy, her dog, who has +accompanied her in all her trips, and is not debased by sex, has been +elected into the club. She has therefore an opportunity for exercising in +behalf of her dog that beautiful self-abnegation which is said to be a +part of woman's nature, impelling her always to prefer that her laurels +should be worn by somebody else.</p> + +<p>The dog probably made no objection to these vicarious honors; nor is +any objection made by the young gentlemen who reply eloquently to the +toast, "The Ladies," at public dinners, or who kindly consent to be +educated at masculine colleges on "scholarships" perhaps founded by women. +Those who receive the emoluments of these funds must reflect within +themselves, occasionally, how grand a thing is this power of substitution +given to women, and how pleasant are its occasional results to the +substitute. It is doubtless more blessed to give than to receive, but to +receive without giving has also its pleasures. Very likely the holder of +the scholarship, and the orator who rises with his hand on his heart to +"reply in behalf of the ladies," may do their appointed work well; and so +did the Alpine dog. Yet, after all, but for the work done by his mistress, +the dog would have won no more honor from the Alpine Club than if he had +been a chamois.</p> + +<p>Nothing since Artemus Ward and his wife's relations has been finer than +the generous way in which fathers and brothers disclaim all desire for +profits or honors on the part of their feminine relatives. In a certain +system of schools once known to me, the boys had prizes of money on +certain occasions, but the successful girls at those times received simply +a testimonial of honor for each; "the committee being convinced," it was +said, "that this was more consonant with the true delicacy and generosity +of woman's nature." So in the new arrangements for opening the University +of Copenhagen to young women, Karl Blind writes to the New York "Evening +Post," that it is expressly provided that they shall not "share in the +academic benefices and stipends which have been set apart for male +students." Half of these charities may, for aught that appears, have been +established originally by women, like the American scholarships already +mentioned. Women, however, can avail themselves of them only by deputy, as +the Alp-climbing young lady is represented by her dog.</p> + +<p>It is all a beautiful tribute to the disinterestedness of woman. The +only pity is that this virtue, so much admired, should not be reciprocated +by showing the like disinterestedness toward her. It does not appear that +the butchers and bakers of Copenhagen propose to reduce in the case of +women students "the benefices and stipends" which are to be paid for daily +food. Young ladies at the university are only prohibited from receiving +money, not from needing it. Nor will any of the necessary fatigues of +Alpine climbing be relaxed for any young lady because she is a woman. The +fatigues will remain in full force, though the laurels be denied. The +mountain-passes will make small account of the "tenderness and delicacy of +her sex." When the toil is over she will be regarded as too delicate to be +thanked for it; but, by way of compensation, the Alpine Club will allow +her to be represented by her dog.</p> + +<h2><a name="3-7"></a><a href="#TOC">THE GOSPEL OF HUMILIATION</a></h2> + +<p>"The silliest man who ever lived," wrote Fanny Fern once, "has always +known enough, when he says his prayers, to thank God he was not born a +woman." President ---- of ---- College is not a silly man at all, and he +is devoting his life to the education of women; yet he seems to feel as +vividly conscious of his superior position as even Fanny Fern could wish. +If he had been born a Jew, he would have thanked God, in the appointed +ritual, for not having made him a woman. If he had been a Mohammedan, he +would have accepted the rule which forbids "a fool, a madman, or a woman" +to summon the faithful to prayer. Being a Christian clergyman, with +several hundred immortal souls, clothed in female bodies, under his +charge, he thinks it his duty, at proper intervals, to notify his young +ladies, that, though they may share with men the glory of being +sophomores, they still are in a position, as regards the other sex, of +hopeless subordination. This is the climax of his discourse, which in its +earlier portions contains many good and truthful things:--</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>"And, as the woman is different from the man, so is she relative to +him. This is true on the other side also. They are bound together by +mutual relationship so intimate and vital that the existence of neither is +absolutely complete except with reference to the other. But there is this +difference, that the relation of woman is, characteristically, that of +subordination and dependence. This does not imply inferiority of +character, of capacity, of value, in the sight of God or man; and it has +been the glory of woman to have accepted the position of formal +inferiority assigned her by the Creator, with all its responsibilities, +its trials, its possible outward humiliations and sufferings, in the proud +consciousness that it is not incompatible with an essential superiority; +that it does not prevent her from occupying, if she will, an inward +elevation of character, from which she may look down with pitying and +helpful love on him she calls her lord. Jesus said, 'Ye know that the +princes of the Gentiles exercise dominion over them, and they that are +great exercise authority upon them. But it shall not be so among you; but +whosoever will be great among you, let him be your minister; and whosoever +will be chief among you, let him be your servant, even as the Son of man +came, not to be ministered unto, but to minister, and to give his life a +ransom for many.' Surely woman need not hesitate to estimate her status by +a criterion of dignity sustained by such authority. She need not shrink +from a position which was sought by the Son of God, and in whose trials +and griefs she will have his sympathy and companionship."</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>There is a comforting aspect to this discourse, after all. It holds out +the hope, that a particularly noble woman may not be personally inferior +to a remarkably bad husband, but "may look down with pitying and helpful +love on him she calls her lord." The drawback is not only that it insults +woman by a reassertion of a merely historical inferiority, which is +steadily diminishing, but that it fortifies this by precisely the same +talk about the dignity of subordination which has been used to buttress +every oppression since the world began. Never yet was there a pious +slaveholder who did not quote to his slaves, on Sunday, precisely the same +texts with which President ---- favors his meek young pupils. Never yet +was there a slaveholder who would not shoot through the head anybody who +should attempt to place him in that beautiful position of subjection whose +spiritual merits he had just been proclaiming. When it came to that, he +was like Thoreau, who believed resignation to be a virtue, but preferred +"not to practice it unless it was quite necessary."</p> + +<p>Thus, when the Rev. Charles C. Jones of Savannah used to address the +slaves on their condition, he proclaimed the beauty of obedience in a way +to bring tears to their eyes. And this, he frankly assures the masters, is +the way to check insurrection and advance their own "pecuniary interests." +He says of the slave, that under proper religious instruction "his +conscience is enlightened and his soul is awed;... to God he commits the +ordering of his lot, and in his station renders to all their dues, +obedience to whom obedience, and honor to whom honor. <i>He dares not +wrest from God his own care and protection.</i> While he sees a preference +in the various conditions of men, he remembers the words of the apostle: +'Art thou called being a servant? care not for it; but if thou mayest be +free, use it rather. For he that is called in the Lord, being a servant, +is the Lord's freeman: likewise also he that is called, being free, is +Christ's servant.'"[1]</p> + +<p>I must say that the Rev. Mr. Jones's preaching seems to me precisely as +good as Dr.------'s, and that a sensible woman ought to be as much +influenced by the one as was Frederick Douglass by the other--that is, not +at all. Let the preacher try "subordination" himself, and see how he likes +it. The beauty of service, such as Jesus praised, lay in the willingness +of the service: a service that is serfdom loses all beauty, whether +rendered by man or by woman. My objection to separate schools and colleges +for women is that they are too apt to end in such instructions as +this.</p> + +<p>[Footnote 1: <i>Religious Instruction of the Negroes.</i> Savannah, +1842, pp. 208-211.]</p> + +<h2><a name="3-8"></a><a href="#TOC">CELERY AND CHERUBS</a></h2> + +<p>There was once a real or imaginary old lady who had got the metaphor of +Scylla and Charybdis a little confused. Wishing to describe a perplexing +situation, this lady said,--</p> + +<p>"You see, my dear, she was between Celery on one side and Cherubs on +the other! You know about Celery and Cherubs, don't you? They was two +rocks somewhere; and if you didn't hit one, you was pretty sure to run +smack on the other."</p> + +<p>This describes, as a clever writer in the New York "Tribune" declares, +the present condition of women who "agitate." Their Celery and Cherubs are +tears and temper. It is a good hit, and we may well make a note of it. It +is the danger of all reformers, that they will vibrate between +discouragement and anger. When things go wrong, what is it one's impulse +to do? To be cast down, or to be stirred up; to wring one's hands, or +clench one's fists,--in short, tears or temper.</p> + +<p>"Mother," said a resolute little girl of my acquaintance, "if the +dinner was all spoiled, I wouldn't sit down, and cry! I'd say, 'Hang it!'" +This cherub preferred the alternative of temper, on days when the celery +turned out badly. Probably her mother was addicted to the other practice, +and exhibited the tears.</p> + +<p>But as this alternative is found to exist for both sexes, and on all +occasions, why charge it especially on the woman-suffrage movement? Men +are certainly as much given to ill temper as women; and, if they are less +inclined to tears, they make it up in sulks, which are just as bad. +Nicholas Nickleby, when the pump was frozen, was advised by Mr. Squeers to +"content himself with a' dry polish;" and so there is a kind of dry +despair into which men fall, which is quite as forlorn as any tears of +women. How many a man has doubtless wished at such times that the pump of +his lachrymal glands could only thaw out, and he could give his emotions +something more than a "dry polish"! The unspeakable comfort some women +feel in sitting for ten minutes with a handkerchief over their eyes! The +freshness, the heartiness, the new life visible in them, when the crying +is done, and the handkerchief comes down again!</p> + +<p>And, indeed, this simple statement brings us to the real truth, which +should have been more clearly seen by the writer who tells this story. She +is wrong in saying, "It is urged that men and women stand on an equality, +are exactly alike." Many of us urge the "equality:" very few of us urge +the "exactly alike." An apple and an orange, a potato and a tomato, a rose +and a lily, the Episcopal and the Presbyterian churches, Oxford and +Cambridge, Yale and Harvard,--we may surely grant equality in each case, +without being so exceedingly foolish as to go on and say that they are +exactly alike.</p> + +<p>And precisely here is the weak point of the whole case, as presented by +this writer. Women give way to tears more readily than men? Granted. Is +their sex any the weaker for it? Not a bit. It is simply a difference of +temperament: that is all. It involves no inferiority. If you think that +this habit necessarily means weakness, wait and see! Who has not seen +women break down in tears during some domestic calamity, while the +"stronger sex" were calm; and who has not seen those same women, that +temporary excitement being over, rise up and dry their eyes, and be +thenceforth the support and stay of their households, and perhaps bear up +the "stronger sex" as a stream bears up a ship? I said once to an +experienced physician, watching such a woman, "That woman is really +great."--"Of course she is," he answered; "did you ever see a woman who +was not great, when the emergency required?"</p> + +<p>Now, will women carry this same quality of temperament into their +public career? Doubtless: otherwise they would cease to be women. Will it +be betraying confidence if I own that I have seen two of the very bravest +women of my acquaintance--women who have swayed great audiences--burst +into tears, during a committee meeting, at a moment of unexpected +adversity for "the cause"? How pitiable! our critical observers would have +thought. In five minutes that April shower had passed, and those women +were as resolute and unconquerable as Queen Elizabeth: they were again the +natural leaders of those around them; and the cool and tearless men who +sat beside them were nothing--men were "a lost art," as some one +says--compared with the inexhaustible moral vitality of those two +women.</p> + +<p>No: the dangers of "Celery and Cherubs" are exaggerated. For temper, +women are as good as men, and no better. As for tears, long may they flow! +They are symbols of that mighty distinction of sex which is as +ineffaceable and as essential as the difference between land and sea.</p> + +<h2><a name="3-9"></a><a href="#TOC">THE NEED OF CAVALRY</a></h2> + +<p>In the interesting Buddhist book, "The Wheel of the Law," translated by +Henry Alabaster, there is an account of a certain priest who used to bless +a great king, saying, "May your majesty have the firmness of a crow, the +audacity of a woman, the endurance of a vulture, and the strength of an +ant." The priest then told anecdotes illustrating all of these qualities. +Who has not known occasions wherein some daring woman has been the Joan of +Arc of a perfectly hopeless cause, taken it up where men shrank, carried +it through where they had failed, and conquered by weapons which men would +never have thought of using, and would have lacked faith to employ even if +put into their hands? The wit, the resources, the audacity of women, have +been the key to history and the staple of novels, ever since that larger +novel called history began to be written.</p> + +<p>How is it done? Who knows the secret of their success? All that any man +can say is that the heart takes a large share in the magic. Rogers asserts +in his "Table-Talk," that often, when doubting how to act in matters of +importance, he had received more useful advice from women than from men. +"Women have the understanding of the heart," he said, "which is better +than that of the head." Then this instinct, that begins from the heart, +reaches other hearts also, and through that controls the will. "Win +hearts," said Lord Burleigh to Queen Elizabeth, "and you have hands and +purses;" and the greatest of English sovereigns, in spite of ugliness and +rouge, in spite of coarseness and cruelty and bad passions, was adored by +the nation that she first made great.</p> + +<p>It seems to me that women are a sort of cavalry force in the army of +mankind. They are not always to be relied upon for that steady "hammering +away," which was Grant's one method; but there is a certain Sheridan +quality about them, light-armed, audacious, quick, irresistible. They go +before the main army; their swift wits go scouting far in advance; they +are the first to scent danger, or to spy out chances of success. Their +charge is like that of a Tartar horde, or the wild sweep of the Apaches. +They are upon you from some wholly unexpected quarter; and this +respectable, systematic, well-drilled masculine force is caught and rolled +over and over in the dust, before the man knows what has hit him. Even if +repelled and beaten off, this formidable cavalry is unconquered: routed +and in confusion to-day, it comes back upon you to-morrow--fresh, alert, +with new devices, bringing new dangers. In dealing with it, as the French +complained of the Arabs in Algiers, "Peace is not to be purchased by +victory." And, even if all seems lost, with what a brilliant final charge +it will cover a retreat!</p> + +<p>Decidedly, we need cavalry. In older countries, where it has been a +merely undisciplined and irregular force, it has often done mischief; and +public men, from Demosthenes down, have been lamenting that measures which +the statesman has meditated a whole year may be overturned in a day by a +woman. Under our American government we have foolishly attempted to leave +out this arm of the service altogether; and much of the alleged dulness of +our American history has come from this attempt. Those who have been +trained in the various reforms where woman has taken an equal part--the +anti-slavery reform especially--know well how much of the energy, the +dash, the daring, of those movements have come from her. A revolution with +a woman in it is stronger than the established order that omits her. It is +not that she is superior to man, but she is different from man; and we can +no more spare her than we could spare the cavalry from an army.</p> + +<h2><a name="3-10"></a><a href="#TOC">THE REASON FIRM, THE TEMPERATE +WILL</a></h2> + +<p>It is a part of the necessary theory of republican government, that +every class and race shall be judged by its highest types, not its lowest. +The proposition of the French revolutionary statesman, to begin the work +of purifying the world by arresting all the cowards and knaves, is liable +to the objection that it would find victims in every circle. Republican +government begins at the other end, and assumes that the community +generally has good intentions at least, and some common sense, however it +may be with individuals. Take the very quality which the newspapers so +often deny to women,--the quality of steadiness. "In fact, men's great +objection to the entrance of the female mind into politics is drawn from a +suspicion of its unsteadiness on matters in which the feelings could by +any possibility be enlisted." Thus says the New York "Nation." Let us +consider this implied charge against women, and consider it not by +generalizing from a single instance,--"just like a woman," as the editors +would doubtless say, if a woman had done it,--but by observing whole +classes of that sex, taken together.</p> + +<p>These classes need some care in selection, for the plain reason that +there are comparatively few circles in which women have yet been allowed +enough freedom of scope, or have acted sufficiently on the same plane with +men, to furnish a fair estimate of their probable action, were they +enfranchised. Still there occur to me three such classes,--the +anti-slavery women, the Quaker women, and the women who conduct +philanthropic operations in our large cities. If the alleged unsteadiness +of women is to be felt in public affairs, it would have been felt in these +organizations. Has it been so felt?</p> + +<p>Of the anti-slavery movement I can personally testify--and I have heard +the same point fully recognized among my elders, such as Garrison, +Phillips, and Quincy--that the women contributed their full share, if not +more than their share, to the steadiness of that movement, even in times +when the feelings were most excited, as, for instance, in fugitive-slave +cases. Who that has seen mobs practically put down, and mayors cowed into +decency, by the silent dignity of those rows of women who sat, with their +knitting, more imperturbable than the men, can read without a smile these +doubts of the "steadiness" of that sex? Again, among Quaker women, I have +asked the opinion of prominent Friends, as of John G. Whittier, whether it +has been the experience of that body that women were more flighty and +unsteady than men in their official action; and have been uniformly +answered in the negative. And finally, as to benevolent organizations, a +good test is given in the fact,--first pointed out, I believe, by that +eminently practical philanthropist, Rev. Augustus Woodbury of +Providence,--that the whole tendency has been, during the last twenty +years, to put the management, even the financial control, of our +benevolent societies, more and more into the hands of women, and that +there has never been the slightest reason to reverse this policy. Ask the +secretaries of the various boards of State Charities, or the officers of +the Social Science Associations, if they have found reason to complain of +the want of steadfast qualities in the "weaker sex." Why is it that the +legislation of Massachusetts has assigned the class requiring the +steadiest of all supervision--the imprisoned convicts--to "five +commissioners of prisons, two of whom shall be women"? These are the +points which it would be worthy of our journals to consider, instead of +hastily generalizing from single instances. Let us appeal from the typical +woman of the editorial picture,--fickle, unsteady, foolish,--to the nobler +conception of womanhood which the poet Wordsworth found fulfilled in his +own household:--</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>"A being breathing thoughtful breath,<br> +A traveller betwixt life and death;<br> +<i>The reason firm, the temperate will;<br> +Endurance, foresight, strength and skill;<br> +</i> A perfect woman, nobly planned<br> + To warn, to comfort, to command,<br> + And yet a spirit still, and bright<br> +With something of an angel light."</p> +</blockquote> + +<h2><a name="3-11"></a><a href="#TOC">ALLURES TO BRIGHTER WORLDS, AND +LEADS THE WAY</a></h2> + +<p>When a certain legislature had "School Suffrage" under consideration, +the other day, the suggestion was made by one of the pithiest and +quaintest of the speakers, that men were always better for the society of +women, and therefore ought to vote in their company. "If all of us," he +said, "would stay away from all places where we cannot take our wives and +daughters with us, we should keep better company than we now do." This +expresses a feeling which grows more and more common among the better +class of men, and which is the key to much progress in the condition of +women. There can be no doubt that the increased association of the sexes +in society, in school, in literature, tends to purify these several +spheres of action. Yet, when we come to philosophize on this, there occur +some perplexities on the way.</p> + +<p>For instance, the exclusion of woman from all these spheres was in +ancient Greece almost complete; yet the leading Greek poets, as Homer and +the tragedians, are exceedingly chaste in tone, and in this respect beyond +most of the great poets of modern nations. Again, no European nation has +quite so far sequestered and subordinated women as has Spain; and yet the +whole tone of Spanish literature is conspicuously grave and decorous. This +plainly indicates that race has much to do with the matter, and that the +mere admission or exclusion of women is but one among several factors. In +short, it is easy to make out a case by a rhetorical use of the facts on +one side; but, if we look at all the facts, the matter presents greater +difficulties.</p> + +<p>Again, it is to be noted that in several countries the first women who +have taken prominent part in literature have been as bad as the men; as, +for instance, Marguerite of Navarre and Mrs. Aphra Behn. This might indeed +be explained by supposing that they had to gain entrance into literature +by accepting the dissolute standards which they found prevailing. But it +would probably be more correct to say that these standards themselves were +variable, and that their variation affected, at certain periods, women as +well as men. Marguerite of Navarre wrote religious books as well as merry +stories; and we know from Lockhart's Life of Scott, that ladies of high +character in Edinburgh used to read Mrs. Behn's tales and plays aloud, at +one time, with delight,--although one of the same ladies found, in her old +age, that she could not read them to herself without blushing. Shakespeare +puts coarse repartees into the mouths of women of stainless virtue. George +Sand is not considered an unexceptionable writer; but she tells us in her +autobiography that she found among her grandmother's papers poems and +satires so indecent that she could not read them through, and yet they +bore the names of <i>abbés</i> and gentlemen whom she remembered in +her childhood as models of dignity and honor. Voltaire inscribes to ladies +of high rank, who doubtless regarded it as a great compliment, verses such +as not even a poet of the English "fleshly school" would now print at all. +In "Poems by Eminent Ladies,"--published in 1755 and reprinted in +1774,--there are one or two poems as gross and disgusting as anything in +Swift; yet their authors were thought reputable women. Allan Ramsay's +"Tea-Table Miscellany"--a collection of English and Scottish songs--was +first published in 1724; and in his preface to the sixteenth edition the +editor attributes its great success, especially among the ladies, to the +fact that he has carefully excluded all grossness, "that the modest voice +and ear of the fair singer might meet with no affront;" and adds, "the +chief bent of all my studies being to attain their good graces." There is +no doubt of the great popularity enjoyed by the book in all circles; yet +it contains a few songs which the most licentious newspaper would not now +publish. The inference is irresistible, from this and many other similar +facts, that the whole tone of manners and decency has very greatly +improved among the European races within a century and a half.</p> + +<p>I suspect the truth to be, that, besides the visible influence of race +and religion, there has been an insensible and almost unconscious +improvement in each sex, with respect to these matters, as time has passed +on; and that the mutual desire to please has enabled each sex to help the +other,--the sex which is naturally the more refined taking the lead. But I +should lay more stress on this mutual influence, and less on mere feminine +superiority, than would be laid by many. It is often claimed by teachers +that co-education helps not only boys, but also girls, to develop greater +propriety of manners. When the sexes are wholly separate, or associate on +terms of entire inequality, no such good influence occurs: the more equal +the association, the better for both parties. After all, the Divine model +is to be found in the family; and the best ingenuity cannot improve much +upon it.</p> + +<center> +<hr class="narrow"> +</center> +<h2 align="center"><a name="4"></a><a href="#TOC">IV<br> + THE HOME</a></h2> + +<blockquote> +<p>"In respect to the powers and rights of married women, the law is by no +means abreast of the spirit of the age. Here are seen the old fossil +footprints of feudalism. The law relating to woman tends to make every +family a barony or a monarchy or a despotism, of which the husband is the +baron, king, or despot, and the wife the dependent, serf, or slave. That +this is not always the fact, is not due to the law, but to the enlarged +humanity which spurns the narrow limits of its rules. The progress of +civilization has changed the family from a barony to a republic; but the +law has not kept pace with the advance of ideas, manners, and +customs."--W.W. STORY'S Treatise on Contracts not under Seal, § 84, +third edition, p. 89.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p> </p> + +<h2><a name="4-1"></a><a href="#TOC">WANTED--HOMES</a></h2> + +<p>We see advertisements, occasionally, of "Homes for Aged Women," and +more rarely "Homes for Aged Men." The question sometimes suggests itself, +whether it would not be better to begin the provision earlier, and see +that homes are also provided, in some form, for the middle-aged and even +the young. The trouble is, I suppose, that as it takes two to make a +bargain, so it takes at least two to make a home; and unluckily it takes +only one to spoil it.</p> + +<p>Madame Roland once defined marriage as an institution where one person +undertakes to provide happiness for two; and many failures are accounted +for, no doubt, by this false basis. Sometimes it is the man, more often +the woman, of whom this extravagant demand is made. There are marriages +which have proved a wreck almost wholly through the fault of the wife. Nor +is this confined to wedded homes alone. I have known a son who lived +alone, patiently and uncomplainingly, with that saddest of all conceivable +companions, a drunken mother. I have known another young man who supported +in his own home a mother and sister, both habitual drunkards. All these +were American-born, and all of respectable social position. A house +shadowed by such misery is not a home, though it might have proved such +but for the sins of women. Such instances are, however, rare and +occasional compared with the cases where the same offence in the husband +makes ruin of the home.</p> + +<p>Then there are the cases where indolence, or selfishness, or vanity, or +the love of social excitement, in the woman, unfits her for home life. +Here we come upon ground where perhaps woman is the greater sinner. It +must be remembered, however, that against this must be balanced the +neglect produced by club-life, or by the life of society-membership, in a +man. A brilliant young married belle in London once told me that she was +glad her husband was so fond of his club, for it amused him every night +while she went to balls. "Married men do not go much into society here," +she said, "unless they are regular flirts,--which I do not think my +husband would ever be, for he is very fond of me,--so he goes every night +to his club, and gets home about the same time that I do. It is a very +nice arrangement." It is perhaps needless to add that they are long since +divorced.</p> + +<p>It is common to denounce club-life in our large cities as destructive +of the home. The modern club is simply a more refined substitute for the +old-fashioned tavern, and is on the whole an advance in morals as well as +manners. In our large cities a man in a certain social coterie belongs to +a club, if he can afford it, as a means of contact with his fellows, and +to have various conveniences which he cannot so economically obtain at +home. A few haunt clubs constantly; the many use them occasionally. More +absorbing than these, perhaps, are the secret societies which have so +revived among us since the war, and which consume time so fearfully. There +was a case mentioned in the newspapers lately of a man who belonged to +some twenty of these associations; and when he died, and each wished to +conduct his funeral, great was the strife! In the small city where I write +there are seventeen secret societies down in the directory, and I suppose +as many more not so conspicuous. I meet men who assure me that they +habitually attend a society meeting every evening of the week except +Sunday, when they go to church meeting. These are rarely men of leisure; +they are usually mechanics or business men of some kind, who are hard at +work all day, and never see their families except at meal-times. Their +case is far worse, so far as absence from home is concerned, than that of +the "club-men" of large cities; for these are often men of leisure, who, +if married, at least make home one of their lounging-places, which such +secret-society men do not.</p> + +<p>I honestly believe that this melancholy desertion of the home is +largely due to the traditional separation between the alleged spheres of +the sexes. The theory still prevails largely, that home is the peculiar +province of the woman, that she has almost no duties out of it; and hence, +naturally enough, that the husband has almost no duties in it. If he is +amused there, let him stay there; but, as it is not his recognized sphere +of duty, he is not actually violating any duty by absenting himself. This +theory even pervades our manuals of morals, of metaphysics, and of popular +science; and it is not every public teacher who has the manliness, having +once stated it, to modify his statement, as did the venerable President +Hopkins of Williams College, when lecturing the other day to the young +ladies of Vassar.</p> + +<p>"I would," he said, "at this point correct my teaching in 'The Law of +Love' to the effect that home is peculiarly the sphere of woman, and civil +government that of man. <i>I now regard the home as the joint sphere of +man and woman, and the sphere of civil government more of an open question +as between the two.</i> It is, however, to be lamented that the present +agitation concerning the rights of woman is so much a matter of 'rights' +rather than of 'duties,' as the reform of the latter would involve the +former."</p> + +<p>If our instructors in moral philosophy will only base their theory of +ethics as broadly as this, we shall no longer need to advertise "Homes +Wanted;" for the joint efforts of men and women will soon provide +them.</p> + +<h2><a name="4-2"></a><a href="#TOC">THE ORIGIN OF CIVILIZATION</a></h2> + +<p>Nothing throws more light on the whole history of woman than the first +illustration in Sir John Lubbock's "Origin of Civilization." A young girl, +almost naked, is being dragged furiously along the ground by a party of +naked savages, armed literally to the teeth, while those of another band +grasp her by the arm, and almost tear her asunder in the effort to hold +her back. These last are her brothers and her friends; the others are--her +enemies? As you please to call them. They are her future husband and his +kinsmen, who have come to aid him in his wooing.</p> + +<p>This was the primitive rite of marriage. Vestiges of it still remain +among savage nations. And all the romance and grace of the most refined +modern marriage--the orange-blossoms, the bridal veil, the church service, +the wedding feast--these are only the "bright consummate flower" reared by +civilization from that rough seed. All the brutal encounter is softened +into this. Nothing remains of the barbarism except the one word "obey," +and even that is going.</p> + +<p>Now, to say that a thing is going, is to say that it will presently be +gone. To say that anything is changed, is to say that it is to change +further. If it never has been altered, perhaps it will not be; but a +proved alteration of an inch in a year opens the way to an indefinite +modification. The study of the glaciers, for instance, began with the +discovery that they had moved; and from that moment no one doubted that +they were moving all the time.</p> + +<p>It is the same with the position of woman. Once open your eyes to the +fact that it has changed, and who is to predict where the matter shall +end? It is sheer folly to say, "Her relative position will always be what +it has been," when one glance at Sir John Lubbock's picture shows that +there is no fixed "has been," but that her original position was long +since altered and revised. Those who still use this argument are like +those who laughed at the lines of stakes which Agassiz planted across the +Aar glacier in 1840. But the stakes settled the question, and proved the +motion. <i>Però sim muove</i>: "But it moves."</p> + +<p>The motion once proved, the whole range of possible progress is before +us. The amazement of that Chinese visitor in Boston, the other day, when +he saw a woman addressing a missionary meeting; the astonishment of all +English visitors when young ladies teach classes in geometry and Latin, in +our high schools; the surprise of foreigners at seeing the rough throng in +the Cooper Institute reading-room submit to the sway of one young woman +with a crochet-needle--all these simply testify to the fact that the +stakes have moved. That they have yet been carried halfway to the end, who +knows?</p> + +<p>What a step from the horrible nuptials of those savage days to the +poetic marriage of Robert Browning and Elizabeth Barrett--the "Sonnets +from the Portuguese" on one side, the "One Word More" on the other! But +who can say that the whole relation between man and woman reached its +climax there, and that where the past has brought changes so vast the +future is to add nothing? Who knows that, when "the world's great bridals +come," people may not look back with pity, even on this era of the +Brownings? Perhaps even Elizabeth Barrett promised to obey!</p> + +<p>At any rate, it is safe to say that each step concedes the probability +of another. Even from the naked barbarian to the veiled Oriental, from the +savage hut to the carefully enshrined harem, there is a step forward. One +more step in the spiral line of progress has brought us to the unveiled +face and comparatively free movements of the English or American woman. +From the kitchen to the public lecture-room, from that to the +lecture-platform, and from that again to the ballot-box,--these are far +slighter steps than those which gradually lifted the savage girl of Sir +John Lubbock's picture into the possession of the alphabet and the dignity +of a home. So easy are these future changes beside those of the past, that +to doubt their possibility is as if Agassiz, after tracing year by year +the motion of his Alpine glacier, should deny its power to move one inch +farther into the sunny valley, and there to melt harmlessly away.</p> + +<h2><a name="4-3"></a><a href="#TOC">THE LOW-WATER MARK</a></h2> + +<p>We constantly see it assumed, in arguments against any step in the +elevation of woman, that her position is a thing fixed permanently by +nature, so that there can be in it no great or essential change. Every +successive modification is resisted as "a reform against nature;" and this +argument from permanence is always that which appears most convincing to +conservative minds. Let us see how the facts confirm it.</p> + +<p>A story is going the rounds of the newspapers in regard to a Russian +peasant and his wife. For some act of disobedience the peasant took the +law into his own hands; and his mode of discipline was to tie the poor +creature naked to a post in the street, and to call on every passer-by to +strike her a blow. Not satisfied with this, he placed her on the ground, +and tied heavy weights on her limbs until one arm was broken. When finally +released, she made a complaint against him in court. The court discharged +him on the ground that he had not exceeded the legal authority of a +husband. Encouraged by this, he caused her to be arrested in return; and +the same court sentenced her to another public whipping for +disobedience.</p> + +<p>No authority was given for this story in the newspaper where I saw it; +but it certainly did not first appear in a woman-suffrage newspaper, and +cannot therefore be a manufactured "outrage." I use it simply to +illustrate the low-water mark at which the position of woman may rest, in +the largest Christian nation of the world. All the refinements, all the +education, all the comparative justice, of modern society, have been +gradually upheaved from some such depth as this. When the gypsies +described by Leland treat even the ground trodden upon by a woman as +impure, they simply illustrate the low plane from which all the elevation +of woman has begun. All these things show that the position of that sex in +society, so far from being a thing in itself permanent, has been in +reality the most changing of all factors in the social problem. And this +inevitably suggests the question, Are we any more sure that her present +position is finally and absolutely fixed than were those who observed it +at any previous time in the world's history? Granting that her condition +was once at low-water mark, who is authorized to say that it has yet +reached high tide?</p> + +<p>It is very possible that this Russian wife, once scourged back to +submission, ended her days in the conviction, and taught it to her +daughters, that such was a woman's rightful place. When an American woman +of to-day says, "I have all the rights I want," is she on any surer +ground? Grant that the difference is vast between the two. How do we know +that even the later condition is final, or that anything is final but +entire equality before the laws? It is not many years since William +Story--in a legal work inspired and revised by his father, the greatest of +American jurists--wrote this indignant protest against the injustice of +the old common law:--</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>"In respect to the powers and rights of married women, the law is by no +means abreast of the spirit of the age. Here are seen the old fossil +footprints of feudalism. The law relating to woman tends to make every +family a barony or a monarchy, or a despotism, of which the husband is the +baron, king, or despot, and the wife the dependent, serf, or slave. That +this is not always the fact is not due to the law, but to the enlarged +humanity which spurns the narrow limits of its rules. The progress of +civilization has changed the family from a barony to a republic; but the +law has not kept pace with the advance of ideas, manners, and customs. +And, although public opinion is a check to legal rules on the subject, the +rules are feudal and stern. Yet the position of woman throughout history +serves as the criterion of the freedom of the people or an age. When man +shall despise that right which is founded only on might, woman will be +free and stand on an equal level with him,--a friend and not a +dependent."[1]</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>We know that the law is greatly changed and ameliorated in many places +since Story wrote this statement; but we also know how almost every one of +these changes was resisted: and who is authorized to say that the final +and equitable fulfilment is yet reached?</p> + +<p>[Footnote 1: Story's <i>Treatise on the Law of Contracts not under +Seal</i>, § 84, p. 89.]</p> + +<h2><a name="4-4"></a><a href="#TOC">OBEY</a></h2> + +<p>After witnessing the marriage ceremony of the Episcopal Church, the +other day, I walked down the aisle with the young rector who had +officiated. It was natural to speak of the beauty of the Church service on +an occasion like that; but, after doing this, I felt compelled to protest +against the unrighteous pledge to obey. "I hope," I said, "to live to see +that word expunged from the Episcopal service, as it has been from that of +the Methodists. The Roman Catholics, you know, have never had it."</p> + +<p>"Why do you object?" he asked. "Is it because you know that they will +not obey?"</p> + +<p>"Because they ought not," I said.</p> + +<p>"Well," said he, after a few moments' reflection, and looking up +frankly, "I do not think they ought!"</p> + +<p>Here was a young clergyman of great earnestness and self-devotion, who +included it among the sacred duties of his life to impose upon ignorant +young girls a solemn obligation, which he yet thought they ought not to +incur, and did not believe that they would keep. There could hardly be a +better illustration of the confusion in the public mind, or the manner in +which "the subjection of woman" is being outgrown, or the subtile way in +which this subjection has been interwoven with sacred ties, and baptized +"duty."</p> + +<p>The advocates of woman suffrage are constantly reproved for using the +terms "subjection," "oppression," and "slavery," as applied to woman. They +simply commit the same sin as that committed by the original +abolitionists. They are "as harsh as truth, as uncompromising as justice." +Of course they talk about oppression and emancipation. It is the word +<i>obey</i> that constitutes the one, and shows the need of the other. +Whoever is pledged to obey is technically and literally a slave, no matter +how many roses surround the chains. All the more so if the slavery is +self-imposed, and surrounded by all the prescriptions of religion. Make +the marriage tie as close as church or state can make it; but let it be +equal, impartial. That it may be so, the word <i>obey</i> must be +abandoned or made reciprocal. Where invariable obedience is promised, +equality is gone.</p> + +<p>That there may be no doubt about the meaning of this word in the +marriage covenant, the usages of nations often add symbolic explanations. +These are generally simple, and brutal enough to be understood. The Hebrew +ceremony, when the bridegroom took off his slipper and struck the bride on +the neck as she crossed his threshold, was unmistakable. As my black +sergeant said, when a white prisoner questioned his authority, and he +pointed to the <i>chevrons</i> on his sleeve, "Dat mean guv'ment." All +these forms mean simply government also. The ceremony of the slipper has +now no recognition, except when people fling an old shoe after the bride, +which is held by antiquarians to be the same observance. But it is all +preserved and concentrated into a single word, when the bride promises to +obey.</p> + +<p>The deepest wretchedness that has ever been put into human language, or +that has exceeded it, has grown out of that pledge. There is no misery on +earth like that of a pure and refined woman who finds herself owned, body +and soul, by a drunken, licentious, brutal man. The very fact that she is +held to obedience by a spiritual tie makes it worse. Chattel slavery was +not so bad; for, though the master might pervert religion for his own +satisfaction, he could not impose upon the slave. Never yet did I see a +negro slave who thought it a duty to obey his master; and therefore there +was always some dream of release. But who has not heard of some delicate +and refined woman, one day of whose torture was equivalent to years of +that possible to an obtuse frame,--who had the door of escape ready at +hand for years, and yet died a lingering death rather than pass through +it; and this because she had promised to obey!</p> + +<p>It is said of one of the most gifted women who ever trod American +soil,-- she being of English birth,--that, before she obtained the divorce +which separated her from her profligate husband, she once went for counsel +to the wife of her pastor. She unrolled before her the long catalogue of +merciless outrages to which she had been subject, endangering finally her +health, her life, and that of her children born and to be born. When she +turned at last for advice to her confessor, with the agonized inquiry, +"What is it my duty to do?"--"Do?" said the stern adviser: "Lie down on +the floor, and let your husband trample on you if he will. That is a +woman's duty."</p> + +<p>The woman who gave this advice was not naturally inhuman nor heartless: +she had simply been trained in the school of obedience. The Jesuit +doctrine, that a priest should be as a corpse, <i>perinde ac cadaver</i>, +in the hands of a superior priest, is not worse. Woman has no right to +delegate, nor man to assume, a responsibility so awful. Just in proportion +as it is consistently carried out, it trains men from boyhood into +self-indulgent tyrants; and, while some women are transformed by it to +saints, others are crushed into deceitful slaves. That this was the result +of chattel slavery, this nation has at length learned. We learn more +slowly the profounder and more subtile moral evil that follows from the +unrighteous promise to obey.</p> + +<h2><a name="4-5"></a><a href="#TOC">WOMAN IN THE CHRYSALIS</a></h2> + +<p>When the bride receives the ring upon her finger, and utters--if she +utters it--the promise to obey, she sees a poetic beauty in the rite. +Turning of her own free will from her maiden liberty, she voluntarily +takes the yoke of service upon her. This is her view; but is this the +historic fact in regard to marriage? Not at all. The pledge of +obedience--the whole theory of inequality in marriage--is simply what is +left to us of a former state of society, in which every woman, old or +young, must obey somebody. The state of tutelage, implied in such a +marriage, is merely what is left of the old theory of the "Perpetual +Tutelage of Women," under the Roman law.</p> + +<p>Roman law, from which our civil law is derived, has its foundation +evidently in patriarchal tradition. It recognized at first the family +only, and that family was held together by paternal power <i>(patria +potestas)</i>. If the father died, his powers passed to the son or +grandson, as the possible head of a new family; but these powers could +never pass to a woman, and every woman, of whatever age, must be under +somebody's legal control. Her father dying, she was still subject through +life to her nearest male relations, or to her father's nominees, as her +guardians. She was under perpetual guardianship, both as to person and +property. No years, no experience, could make her anything but a child +before the law.</p> + +<p>In Oriental countries the system was still more complete. "A man," says +the Gentoo Code of Laws, "must keep his wife so much in subjection that +she by no means be mistress of her own action. If the wife have her own +free will, notwithstanding she be of a superior caste, she will behave +amiss." But this authority, which still exists in India, is not merely +conjugal. The husband exerts it simply as being the wife's legal guardian. +If the woman be unmarried or a widow, she must be as rigorously held under +some other guardianship. It is no uncommon thing for a woman in India to +be the ward of her own son. Lucretia Mott or Florence Nightingale would +there be in personal subjection to somebody. Any man of legal age would be +recognized as a fit custodian for them, but there must be a man.</p> + +<p>With some variation of details at different periods, the same system +prevailed essentially at Rome, down to the time when Rome became +Christian. Those who wish for particulars will find them in an admirable +chapter (the fifth) of Maine's "Ancient Law." At one time the husband was +held to possess the <i>patria potestas</i>, or paternal power, in its full +force. By law "the woman passed <i>in manum viri</i>, that is, she became +the daughter of her husband." All she had became his, and after his death +she was retained in the same strict tutelage by any guardians his will +might appoint. Afterwards, to soften this rigid bond, the woman was +regarded in law as being temporarily deposited by her family with her +husband; the family appointed guardians over her; and thus, between the +two tyrannies, she won a sort of independence. Then came Christianity, and +swept away the merely parental authority for married women, concentrating +all upon the husband. Hence our legislation bears the mark of a double +origin, and woman is half recognized as an equal and half as a slave.</p> + +<p>It is necessary to remember, therefore, that all the relation of +subjection in marriage is merely the residue of an unnatural system, of +which all else is long since outgrown. It would have seemed to an ancient +Roman a matter of course that a woman should, all her life long, obey the +guardians set over her person. It still seems to many people a matter of +course that she should obey her husband. To others among us, on the +contrary, both these theories of obedience seem barbarous, and the one is +merely a relic of the other.</p> + +<p>We cannot disregard the history of the Theory of Tutelage. If we could +believe that a chrysalis is always a chrysalis, and a butterfly always a +butterfly, we could easily leave each to its appropriate sphere; but when +we see the chrysalis open, and the butterfly come half out of it, we know +that sooner or later it must spread wings, and fly. The theory of tutelage +implies the chrysalis. Woman is the butterfly. Sooner or later she will be +wholly out.</p> + +<h2><a name="4-6"></a><a href="#TOC">TWO AND TWO</a></h2> + +<p>A young man of very good brains was telling me, the other day, his +dreams of his future wife. Rattling on, more in joke than in earnest, he +said, "She must be perfectly ignorant, and a bigot: she must know nothing, +and believe everything. I should wish to have her from the adjoining room +call to me, 'My dear, what do two and two make?'"</p> + +<p>It did not seem to me that his demand would be so very hard to fill, +since bigotry and ignorance are to be had almost anywhere for the asking; +and, as for two and two, I should say that it had always been the habit of +women to ask that question of some man, and to rest easily satisfied with +the answer. They have generally called, as my friend wished, from some +other room, saying, "My dear, what do two and two make?" and the husband +or father or brother has answered and said, "My dear, they make four for a +man, and three for a woman."</p> + +<p>At any given period in the history of woman, she has adopted man's whim +as the measure of her rights; has claimed nothing; has sweetly accepted +anything; the law of two-and-two itself should be at his discretion. At +any given moment, so well was his interpretation received, that it stood +for absolute right. In Rome a woman, married or single, could not testify +in court; in the middle ages, and down to quite modern times, she could +not hold real estate; thirty years ago she could not, in New England, +obtain a collegiate education; even now she can only vote for school +officers.</p> + +<p>The first principles of republican government are so rehearsed and +re-rehearsed, that one would think they must become "as plain as that two +and two make four." But we find throughout, that, as Emerson said of +another class of reasoners, "Their two is not the real two; their four is +not the real four." We find different numerals and diverse arithmetical +rules for the two sexes; as, in some Oriental countries, men and women +speak different dialects of the same language.</p> + +<p>In novels the hero often begins by dreaming, like my friend, of an +ideal wife, who shall be ignorant of everything, and have only brains +enough to be bigoted. Instead of sighing, like Falstaff, "Oh for a fine +young thief, of the age of two and twenty or thereabouts!" the hero sighs +for a fine young idiot of similar age. When the hero is successful in his +search and wooing, the novelist sometimes mercifully removes the young +woman early, like David Copperfield's Dora, she bequeathing the bereaved +husband, on her deathbed, to a woman of sense. In real life these +convenient interruptions do not commonly occur, and the foolish youth +regrets through many years that he did not select an Agnes instead.</p> + +<p>The acute observer Stendhal says,--</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>"In Paris, the highest praise for a marriageable girl is to say, 'She +has great sweetness of character and the disposition of a lamb.' Nothing +produces more impression on fools who are looking out for wives. I think I +see the interesting couple, two years after, breakfasting together on a +dull day, with three tall lackeys waiting upon them!"</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>And he adds, still speaking in the interest of men:--</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>"Most men have a period in their career when they might do something +great, a period when nothing seems impossible. The ignorance of women +spoils for the human race this magnificent opportunity: and love, at the +utmost, in these days, only inspires a young man to learn to ride well, or +to make a judicious selection of a tailor."[1]</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>Society, however, discovers by degrees that there are conveniences in +every woman's knowing the four rules of arithmetic for herself. Two and +two come to the same amount on a butcher's bill, whether the order be +given by a man or a woman; and it is the same in all affairs or +investments, financial or moral. We shall one day learn that with laws, +customs, and public affairs it is the same. Once get it rooted in a +woman's mind, that for her, two and two make three only, and sooner or +later the accounts of the whole human race fail to balance.</p> + +<p>[Footnote 1: <i>De L'Amour</i>, par de Stendhal (Henri Beyle). Paris, +1868 [written in 1822], pp. 182, 198.]</p> + +<h2><a name="4-7"></a><a href="#TOC">A MODEL HOUSEHOLD</a></h2> + +<p>There is an African bird called the hornbill, whose habits are in some +respects a model. The female builds her nest in a hollow tree, lays her +eggs, and broods on them. So far, so good. Then the male feels that he +must also contribute some service; so he walls up the hole closely, giving +only room for the point of the female's bill to protrude. Until the eggs +are hatched, she is thenceforth confined to her nest, and is in the mean +time fed assiduously by her mate, who devotes himself entirely to this +object. Dr. Livingstone has seen these nests in Africa, Layard and others +in Asia, and Wallace in Sumatra.</p> + +<p>Personally I have never seen a hornbill's nest. The nearest approach I +ever made to it was when in Fayal I used to pass near a gloomy mansion, of +which the front windows were walled up, and only one high window was +visible in the rear, beyond the reach of eyes from any neighboring house. +In this cheerful abode, I was assured, a Portuguese lady had been for many +years confined by her jealous husband. It was long since any neighbor had +caught a glimpse of her, but it was supposed that she was alive. There is +no reason to doubt that her husband fed her well. It was simply a case of +human hornbill, with the imprisonment made perpetual.</p> + +<p>I have more than once asked lawyers whether, in communities where the +old common law prevailed, there was anything to prevent such an +imprisonment of a married woman; and they have always answered, "Nothing +but public opinion." Where the husband has the legal custody of the wife's +person, no <i>habeas corpus</i> can avail against him. The hornbill +household is based on a strict application of the old common law. A Hindoo +household was a hornbill household: "a woman, of whatsoever age, should +never be mistress of her own actions," said the code of Menu. An Athenian +household was a hornbill's nest, and great was the outcry when some +Aspasia broke out of it. When the remonstrant petitions legislatures +against the emancipation of woman, we seem to hear the twittering of the +hornbill mother, imploring to be left inside.</p> + +<p>Under some forms, the hornbill theory becomes respectable. There are +many peaceful families, innocent though torpid, where the only dream of +existence is to have plenty of quiet, plenty of food, and plenty of +well-fed children. For them this African household is a sufficient model. +The wife is "a home body." The husband is "a good provider." These are +honest people, and have a right to speak. The hornbill theory is only +dishonest when it comes--as it often comes--from women who lead the life, +not of good stay-at-home fowls, but of paroquets and hummingbirds,--who +sorrowfully bemoan the active habits of enlightened women, while they +themselves</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>"Bear about the mockery of woe<br> +To midnight dances and the public show."</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>It is from these women, in Washington, New York, and elsewhere, that +the loudest appeal for the hornbill standard of domesticity proceeds. Put +them to the test, and give them their chicken-salad and champagne through +a hole in the wall only, and see how they like it.</p> + +<p>But even the most honest and peaceful conservatives will one day admit +that the hornbill is not the highest model. Plato thought that "the soul +of our grandame might haply inhabit the body of a bird;" but Nature has +kindly provided various types of bird-households to suit all varieties of +taste. The bright orioles, filling the summer boughs with color and with +song, are as truly domestic in the freedom of their airy nest as the poor +hornbills who ignorantly make home into a dungeon. And certainly each new +generation of orioles, spreading free wings from that pendent cradle, +affords a happier illustration of judicious nurture than is to be found in +the uncouth little offspring of the hornbills, which Wallace describes as +"so flabby and semi-transparent as to resemble a bladder of jelly, +furnished with head, legs, and rudimentary wings, but with not a sign of a +feather, except a few lines of points indicating where they would +come."</p> + +<h2><a name="4-8"></a><a href="#TOC">A SAFEGUARD FOR THE FAMILY</a></h2> + +<p>Many German-Americans are warm friends of woman suffrage; but the +editors of "Puck," it seems, are not. In a certain number of that comic +journal, there was an unfavorable cartoon on this reform; and in a +following number,--the number, by the way, which contains that amusing +illustration of the vast seaside hotels of the future, with the cheering +announcement, "Only one mile to the barber's shop," and "Take the cars to +the dining-room,"--a lady came to the rescue, and bravely defended woman +suffrage. It seems that the original cartoon depicted in the corner a +pretty family scene, representing father, mother, and children seated +happily together, with the melancholy motto, "Nevermore, nevermore!" And +when the correspondent, Mrs. Blake, very naturally asks what this touching +picture has to do with woman suffrage, Puck says, "If the husband in our +'pretty family scene' should propose to vote for the candidate who was +obnoxious to his wife, would this 'pretty family scene' continue to be a +domestic paradise, or would it remind the spectator of the region in which +Dante spent his 'fortnight off'?"</p> + +<p>It is beautiful to see how much anxiety there is to preserve the +family. Every step in the modification of the old common law, whereby the +wife was, in Baron Alderson's phrase, "the servant of her husband," was +resisted as tending to endanger the family. The proposal that the wife +should control her own earnings, so that her husband should not have the +right to collect them in order to pay his gambling debts, was declared by +English advocates, in the celebrated case of the Hon. Mrs. Norton, the +poetess, to imperil all the future peace of British households.</p> + +<p>Even the liberal-minded "Punch," about the time Girton College was +founded in England, expressed grave doubts whether the harmony of wedded +unions would not receive a blow, from the time when wives should be liable +to know more Greek than their husbands. Yet the marriage relation has +withstood these innovations. It has not been impaired, either by separate +rights, private earnings, or independent Greek: can it be possible that a +little voting will overthrow it?</p> + +<p>The very ground on which woman suffrage is opposed by its enemies might +assuage these fears. If, as we are told, women will not take the pains to +vote except upon the strongest inducements, who has so good an opportunity +as the husband to bring those inducements to bear? and, if so, what is the +separation? Or if, as we are told, women will merely reflect their +husbands' political opinions, why should they dispute about them? The mere +suggestion of a difference deep enough to quarrel for, implies a real +difference of convictions or interests, and indicates that there ought to +be an independent representation of each; unless we fall back, once for +all, on the common-law tradition that man and wife are one, and that one +is the husband. Either the antagonisms which occur in politics are +comparatively superficial, in which case they would do no harm; or else +they touch matters of real interest and principle, in which case every +human being has a right to independent expression, even at a good deal of +risk. In either case, the objection falls to the ground.</p> + +<p>We have fortunately a means of testing, with some fairness of estimate, +the probable amount of this peril. It is generally admitted--and certainly +no German-American will deny--that the most fruitful sources of hostility +and war in all times have been religious, not political. All merely +political antagonism, certainly all which is possible in a republic, fades +into insignificance before this more powerful dividing influence. Yet we +leave all this great explosive force in unimpeded operation,--at any +moment it may be set in action, in any one of those "pretty family scenes" +which "Puck" depicts,--while we are solemnly warned against admitting the +comparatively mild peril of a political difference! It is like cautioning +a manufacturer of dynamite against the danger of meddling with mere +edge-tools. Even with all the intensity of feeling on religious matters, +few families are seriously divided by them; and the influence of political +differences would be still more insignificant.</p> + +<p>The simple fact is that there is no better basis for union than mutual +respect for each other's opinions; and this can never be obtained without +an intelligent independence, "I would rather have a thorn in my side than +an echo," said Emerson of friendship; and the same is true of married +life. It is the echoes, the nonentities, of whom men grow tired; it is the +women with some flavor of individuality who keep the hearts of their +husbands. This is only applying in a higher sense what Shakespeare's +Cleopatra saw. When her handmaidens are questioning how to hold a lover, +and one says,--</p> + +<p> "Give way to him in all: cross him in +nothing,"--</p> + +<p>Cleopatra, from the depth of an unequalled experience, retorts,--</p> + +<p> "Thou speakest like a fool: the way to lose +him!"</p> + +<p>And what "the serpent of old Nile" said, the wives of the future, who +are to be wise as serpents and harmless as doves, may well ponder. It +takes two things different to make a union; and part of that difference +may as well lie in matters political as anywhere else.</p> + +<h2><a name="4-9"></a><a href="#TOC">WOMEN AS ECONOMISTS</a></h2> + +<p>An able lawyer of Boston, arguing the other day before a legislative +committee in favor of giving to the city council a check upon the +expenditures of the school committee, gave as one reason that this body +would probably include more women henceforward, and that women were +ordinarily more lavish than men in their use of money. The truth of this +assumption was questioned at the time; and, the more I think of it, the +more contrary it is to my whole experience. I should say that women, from +the very habit of their lives, are led to be more particular about +details, and more careful as to small economies. The very fact that they +handle less money tends to this. When they are told to spend money, as +they often are by loving or ambitious husbands, they no doubt do it +freely: they have naturally more taste than men, and quite as much love of +luxury. In some instances in this country they spend money recklessly and +wickedly, like the heroines of French novels; but as, even in brilliant +Paris, the women of the middle classes are notoriously better managers +than the men, so we often see, in our scheming America, the same relative +superiority. Often have I heard young men say, "I never knew how to +economize until after my marriage;" and who has not seen multitudes of +instances where women accustomed to luxury have accepted poverty without a +murmur for the sake of those whom they loved?</p> + +<p>I remember a young girl, accustomed to the gayest society of New York, +who engaged herself to a young naval officer, against the advice of the +friends of both. One of her near relatives said to me, "Of all the young +girls I have ever known, she is the least fitted for a poor man's wife." +Yet from the very moment of her marriage she brought their joint expenses +within his scanty pay, and even saved a little money from it. Everybody +knows such instances. We hear men denounce the extravagance of women, +while those very men spend on wine and cigars, on clubs and horses, twice +what their wives spend on their toilet. If the wives are economical, the +husbands perhaps urge them on to greater lavishness. "Why do you not dress +like Mrs. So-and-so?"--"I can't afford it."--"But <i>I</i> can afford it;" +and then, when the bills come in, the talk of extravagance recommences. At +one time in Newport, that lady among the summer visitors who was reported +to be Worth's best customer was also well known to be quite indifferent to +society, and to go into it mainly to please her husband, whose social +ambition was notorious.</p> + +<p>It has often happened to me to serve in organizations where both sexes +were represented, and where expenditures were to be made for business or +pleasure. In these I have found, as a rule, that the women were more +careful, or perhaps I should say more timid, than the men, less willing to +risk anything: the bolder financial experiments came from the men, as one +might expect. In talking the other day with the secretary of an important +educational enterprise, conducted by women, I was surprised to find that +it was cramped for money, though large subscriptions were said to have +been made to it. On inquiry it appeared that these ladies, having pledged +themselves for four years, had divided the amount received into four +parts, and were resolutely limiting themselves, for the first year, to one +quarter part of what had been subscribed. No board of men would have done +so. Any board of men would have allowed far more than a quarter of the sum +for the first year's expenditures, justly reasoning that if the enterprise +began well it would command public confidence, and bring in additional +subscriptions as time went on. I would appeal to any one whose experience +has been in joint associations of men and women, whether this is not a +fair statement of the difference between their ways of working. It does +not prove that women are more honest than men, but that their education or +their nature makes them more cautious in expenditure.</p> + +<p>The habits of society make the dress of a fashionable woman far more +expensive than that of a man of fashion. Formerly it was not so; and, so +long as it was not so, the extravagance of men in this respect quite +equalled that of women. It now takes other forms, but the habit is the +same. The waiters at any fashionable restaurant will tell you that what is +a cheap dinner for a man would be a dear dinner for a woman. Yet after +all, the test is not in any particular class of expenditures, but in the +business-like habit. Men are of course more business-like in large +combinations, for they are more used to them; but for the small details of +daily economy women are more watchful. The cases where women ruin their +husbands by extravagance are exceptional. As a rule, the men are the +bread-winners; but the careful saving and managing and contriving come +from the women.</p> + +<h2><a name="4-10"></a><a href="#TOC">GREATER INCLUDES LESS</a></h2> + +<p>I was once at a little musical party in New York, where several +accomplished amateur singers were present, and with them the eminent +professional, Miss Adelaide Phillipps. The amateurs were first called on. +Each chose some difficult operatic passage, and sang her best. When it +came to the great opera-singer's turn, instead of exhibiting her ability +to eclipse those rivals on her own ground, she simply seated herself at +the piano, and sang "Kathleen Mavourneen" with such thrilling sweetness +that the young Irish girl who was setting the supper-table in the next +room forgot all her plates and teaspoons, threw herself into a chair, put +her apron over her face, and sobbed as if her heart would break. All the +training of Adelaide Phillipps--her magnificent voice, her stage +experience, her skill in effects, her power of expression--went into the +performance of that simple song. The greater included the less. And thus +all the intellectual and practical training that any woman can have, all +her public action and her active career, will make her, if she be a true +woman, more admirable as a wife, a mother, and a friend. The greater +includes the less for her also.</p> + +<p>Of course this is a statement of general facts and tendencies. There +must be among women, as among men, an endless variety of individual +temperaments. There will always be plenty whose career will illustrate the +infirmities of genius, and whom no training can convince that two and two +make four. But the general fact is sure. As no sensible man would +seriously prefer for a wife a Hindoo or Tahitian woman rather than one +bred in England or America, so every further advantage of education or +opportunity will only improve, not impair, the true womanly type.</p> + +<p>Lucy Stone once said, "Woman's nature was stamped and sealed by the +Almighty, and there is no danger of her unsexing herself while his eye +watches her." Margaret Fuller said, "One hour of love will teach a woman +more of her true relations than all your philosophizing." These were the +testimony of women who had studied Greek, and were only the more womanly +for the study. They are worth the opinions of a million half-developed +beings like the Duchess de Fontanges, who was described as being "as +beautiful as an angel and as silly as a goose." The greater includes the +less. Your view from the mountain-side may be very pretty, but she who has +taken one step higher commands your view and her own also. It was no +dreamy recluse, but the accomplished and experienced Stendhal, who wrote, +"The joys of the gay world do not count for much with happy women."[1]</p> + +<p>If a highly educated man is incapable and unpractical, we do not say +that he is educated too well, but not well enough. He ought to know what +he knows, and other things also. Never yet did I see a woman too well +educated to be a wife and a mother; but I know multitudes who deplore, or +have reason to deplore, every day of their lives, the untrained and +unfurnished minds that are so ill-prepared for these sacred duties. Every +step towards equalizing the opportunities of men and women meets with +resistance, of course; but every step, as it is accomplished, leaves men +still men, and women still women. And as we who heard Adelaide Phillipps +felt that she had never had a better tribute to her musical genius than +this young Irish girl's tears, so the true woman will feel that all her +college training for instance, if she has it, may have been well invested, +even for the sake of the baby on her knee. And it is to be remembered, +after all, that each human being lives to unfold his or her own powers, +and do his or her own duties first, and that neither woman nor man has the +right to accept a merely secondary and subordinate life. A noble woman +must be a noble human being; and the most sacred special duties, as of +wife or mother, are all included in this, as the greater includes the +less.</p> + +<p>[Footnote 1: <i>De l'Amour</i>, par de Stendhal (Henri Beyle): "Les +plaisirs du grand monde n'en sont pas pour les femmes heureuses," p. +189.]</p> + +<h2><a name="4-11"></a><a href="#TOC">A COPARTNERSHIP</a></h2> + +<p>Marriage, considered merely in its financial and business relations, +may be regarded as a permanent copartnership.</p> + +<p>Now, in an ordinary copartnership there is very often a complete +division of labor among the partners. If they manufacture +locomotive-engines, for instance, one partner perhaps superintends the +works, another attends to mechanical inventions and improvements, another +travels for orders, another conducts the correspondence, another receives +and pays out the money. The latter is not necessarily the head of the +firm. Perhaps his place could be more easily filled than some of the other +posts. Nevertheless, more money passes through his hands than through +those of all the others put together. Now, should he, at the year's end, +call together the inventor and the superintendent and the traveller and +the correspondent, and say to them, "I have earned all this money this +year, but I will generously give you some of it,"--he would be considered +simply impertinent, and would hardly have a chance to repeat the offence +the year after.</p> + +<p>Yet precisely what would be called folly in this business partnership +is constantly done by men in the copartnership of marriage, and is there +called "common sense" and "social science" and "political economy."</p> + +<p>For instance, a farmer works himself half to death in the hayfield, and +his wife meanwhile is working herself wholly to death in the dairy. The +neighbors come in to sympathize after her demise; and during the few +months' interval before his second marriage they say approvingly, "He was +always a generous man to his folks! He was a good provider!" But where was +the room for generosity, any more than the member of any other firm is to +be called generous, when he keeps the books, receipts the bills, and +divides the money?</p> + +<p>In case of the farming business, the share of the wife is so direct and +unmistakable that it can hardly be evaded. If anything is earned by the +farm, she does her distinct and important share of the earning. But it is +not necessary that she should do even that, to make her, by all the rules +of justice, an equal partner, entitled to her full share of the financial +proceeds.</p> + +<p>Let us suppose an ordinary case. Two young people are married, and +begin life together. Let us suppose them equally poor, equally capable, +equally conscientious, equally healthy. They have children. Those children +must be supported by the earning of money abroad, by attendance and care +at home. If it requires patience and labor to do the outside work, no less +is required inside. The duties of the household are as hard as the duties +of the shop or office. If the wife took her husband's work for a day, she +would probably be glad to return to her own. So would the husband if he +undertook hers. Their duties are ordinarily as distinct and as equal as +those of two partners in any other copartnership. It so happens that the +outdoor partner has the handling of the money; but does that give him a +right to claim it as his exclusive earnings? No more than in any other +business operation.</p> + +<p>He earned the money for the children and the household. She disbursed +it for the children and the household. The very laws of nature, by giving +her the children to bear and rear, absolve her from the duty of their +support, so long as he is alive who was left free by nature for that +purpose. Her task on the average is as hard as his: nay, a portion of it +is so especially hard that it is distinguished from all others by the name +"labor." If it does not earn money, it is because it is not to be measured +in money, while it exists,--nor to be replaced by money, if lost. If a +business man loses his partner, he can obtain another: and a man, no +doubt, may take a second wife; but he cannot procure for his children a +second mother. Indeed, it is a palpable insult to the whole relation of +husband and wife when one compares it, even in a financial light, to that +of business partners. It is only because a constant effort is made to +degrade the practical position of woman below even this standard of +comparison, that it becomes her duty to claim for herself at least as much +as this.</p> + +<p>There was a tradition in a town where I once lived, that a certain +Quaker, who had married a fortune, was once heard to repel his wife, who +had asked him for money in a public place, with the response, "Rachel, +where is that ninepence I gave thee yesterday?" When I read in "Scribner's +Monthly" an article deriding the right to representation of the +Massachusetts women who pay two millions of tax on one hundred and +thirty-two million dollars of property,--asserting that they produced +nothing of it; that it was only "men who produced this wealth, and +bestowed it upon these women;" that it was "all drawn from land and sea by +the hands of men whose largess testifies alike of their love and their +munificence,"--I must say that I am reminded of Rachel's ninepence.</p> + +<h2><a name="4-12"></a><a href="#TOC">ONE RESPONSIBLE HEAD</a></h2> + +<p>When we look through any business directory, there seem to be almost as +many copartnerships as single dealers; and three quarters of these +copartnerships appear to consist of precisely two persons, no more, no +less. These partners are, in the eye of the law, equal. It is not found +necessary, under the law, to make a general provision that in each case +one partner should be supreme and the other subordinate. In many cases, by +the terms of the copartnership there are limitations on one side and +special privileges on the other,--marriage settlements, as it were; but +the general law of copartnership is based on the presumption of equality. +It would be considered infinitely absurd to require that, as the general +rule, one party or the other should be in a state of <i>coverture</i>, +during which the very being and existence of the one should be suspended, +or entirely merged and incorporated into that of the other.</p> + +<p>And yet this requirement, which would be an admitted absurdity in the +case of two business partners, is precisely that which the English common +law still lays down in case of husband and wife. The words which I +employed to describe it, in the preceding sentence, are the very phrases +in which Blackstone describes the legal position of women. And though the +English common law has been, in this respect, greatly modified and +superseded by statute law; yet, when it comes to an argument on woman +suffrage, it is constantly this same tradition to which men and even women +habitually appeal,--the necessity of a single head to the domestic +partnership, and the necessity that the husband should be that head. This +is especially true of English men and women; but it is true of Americans +as well. Nobody has stated it more tersely than Fitzjames Stephen, in his +"Liberty, Equality, and Fraternity" (p. 216), when arguing against Mr. +Mill's view of the equality of the sexes.</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>"Marriage is a contract, one of the principal objects in which is the +government of a family.</p> + +<p>"This government must be vested, either by law or by contract, in the +hands of one of the two married persons."</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>[Then follow some collateral points, not bearing on the present +question.]</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>"Therefore if marriage is to be permanent, the government of the family +must be put by law and by morals into the hands of the husband, for no one +proposes to give it to the wife."</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>This argument he calls "as clear as that of a proposition in Euclid." +He thinks that the business of life can be carried on by no other method. +How is it, then, that when we come to what is called technically and +especially the "business" of every day, this whole fine-spun theory is +disregarded, and men come together in partnership on the basis of +equality?</p> + +<p>Nobody is farther than I from regarding marriage as a mere business +partnership. But it is to be observed that the points wherein it differs +from a merely mercantile connection are points that should make equality +more easy, not more difficult. The tie between two ordinary business +partners is merely one of interest: it is based on no sentiments, sealed +by no solemn pledge, enriched by no home associations, cemented by no new +generation of young life. If a relation like this is found to work well on +terms of equality,--so well that a large part of the business of the world +is done by it,--is it not absurd to suppose that the same equal relation +cannot exist in the married partnership of husband and wife? And if law, +custom, society, all recognize this fact of equality in the one case, why, +in the name of common-sense, should they not equally recognize it in the +other?</p> + +<p>And, again, it may often be far easier to assign a sphere to each +partner in marriage than in business; and therefore the double headship of +a family will involve less need of collision. In nine cases out of ten, +the external support of the family will devolve upon the husband, +unquestioned by the wife; and its internal economy upon the wife, +unquestioned by the husband. No voluntary distribution of powers and +duties between business partners can work so naturally, on the whole, as +this simple and easy demarcation, with which the claim of suffrage makes +no necessary interference. It may require angry discussion to decide which +of two business partners shall buy, and which shall sell; which shall keep +the books, and which do the active work, and so on; but all this is +usually settled in married life by the natural order of things. Even in +regard to the management of children, where collision is likely to come, +if anywhere, it can commonly be settled by that happy formula of Jean +Paul's, that the mother usually supplies the commas and the semicolons in +the child's book of life, and the father the colons and periods. And as to +matters in general, the simple and practical rule, that each question that +arises should be decided by that partner who has personally most at stake +in it, will, in ninety-nine times out of a hundred, carry the domestic +partnership through without shipwreck. Those who cannot meet the hundredth +case by mutual forbearance are in a condition of shipwreck already.</p> + +<h2><a name="4-13"></a><a href="#TOC">ASKING FOR MONEY</a></h2> + +<p>One of the very best wives and mothers I have ever known once said to +me, that, whenever her daughters should be married, she should stipulate +in their behalf with their husbands for a regular sum of money to be paid +them, at certain intervals, for their personal expenditures. Whether this +sum was to be larger or smaller, was a matter of secondary importance,-- +that must depend on the income, and the style of living; but the essential +thing was, that it should come to the wife regularly, so that she should +no more have to make a special request for it than her husband would have +to ask her for a dinner. This lady's own husband was, as I happened to +know, of a most generous disposition, was devotedly attached to her, and +denied her nothing. She herself was a most accurate and careful manager. +There was everything in the household to make the financial arrangements +flow smoothly. Yet she said to me, "I suppose no man can possibly +understand how a sensitive woman shrinks from <i>asking</i> for money. If +I can prevent it, my daughters shall never have to ask for it. If they do +their duty as wives and mothers they have a right to their share of the +joint income, within reasonable limits; for certainly no money could buy +the services they render. Moreover, they have a right to a share in +determining what those reasonable limits are."</p> + +<p>Now, it so happened that I had myself gone through an experience which +enabled me perfectly to comprehend this feeling. In early life I was for a +time in the employ of one of my relatives, who paid me a fair salary but +at no definite periods: I was at liberty to ask him for money up to a +certain amount whenever I needed it. This seemed to me, in advance, a most +agreeable arrangement; but I found it quite otherwise. It proved to be +very disagreeable to apply for money: it made every dollar seem a special +favor; it brought up all kinds of misgivings, as to whether he could spare +it without inconvenience, whether he really thought my services worth it, +and so on. My employer was a thoroughly upright and noble man, and I was +much attached to him. I do not know that he ever refused or demurred when +I made my request. The annoyance was simply in the process of asking; and +this became so great, that I often underwent serious inconvenience rather +than do it. Finally, at the year's end, I surprised my relative very much +by saying that I would accept, if necessary, a lower salary, on condition +that it should be paid on regular days, and as a matter of business. The +wish was at once granted, without the reduction; and he probably never +knew what a relief it was to me.</p> + +<p>Now, if a young man is liable to feel this pride and reluctance toward +an employer, even when a kinsman, it is easy to understand how many women +may feel the same, even in regard to a husband. And I fancy that those who +feel it most are often the most conscientious and high-minded women. It is +unreasonable to say of such persons, "Too sensitive! Too fastidious!" For +it is just this quality of finer sensitiveness which men affect to prize +in a woman, and wish to protect at all hazards. The very fact that a +husband is generous; the very fact that his income is limited,--these may +bring in conscience and gratitude to increase the restraining influence of +pride, and make the wife less willing to ask money of such a husband than +if he were a rich man or a mean one. The only dignified position in which +a man can place his wife is to treat her at least as well as he would +treat a housekeeper, and give her the comfort of a perfectly clear and +definite arrangement as to money matters. She will not then be under the +necessity of nerving herself to solicit from him as a favor what she +really needs and has a right to spend. Nor will she be torturing herself, +on the other side, with the secret fear lest she has asked too much and +more than they can really spare. She will, in short, be in the position of +a woman and a wife, not of a child or a toy.</p> + +<p>I have carefully avoided using the word "allowance" in what has been +said, because that word seems to imply the untrue and mean assumption that +the money is all the husband's to give or withhold as he will. Yet I have +heard this sort of phrase from men who were living on a wife's property or +a wife's earnings; from men who nominally kept boarding-houses, working a +little, while their wives worked hard,--or from farmers, who worked hard, +and made their wives work harder. Even in cases where the wife has no +direct part in the money-making, the indirect part she performs, if she +takes faithful charge of her household, is so essential, so beyond all +compensation in money, that it is an utter shame and impertinence in the +husband when he speaks of "giving" money to his wife as if it were an act +of favor. It is no more an act of favor than when the business manager of +a firm pays out money to the unseen partner who directs the indoor +business or runs the machinery. Be the joint income more or less, the wife +has a claim to her honorable share, and that as a matter of right, without +the daily ignominy of sending in a petition for it.</p> + +<h2><a name="4-14"></a><a href="#TOC">WOMANHOOD AND MOTHERHOOD</a></h2> + +<p>I always groan in spirit when any advocate of woman suffrage, carried +away by zeal, says anything disrespectful about the nursery. It is +contrary to the general tone of feeling among reformers, I am sure, to +speak of this priceless institution as a trivial or degrading sphere, +unworthy the emancipated woman. It is rarely that anybody speaks in this +way; but a single such utterance hinders progress more than any arguments +of the enemy. For every thoughtful person sees that the cares of +motherhood, though not the whole duty of woman, are an essential part of +that duty, wherever they occur; and that no theory of womanly life is good +for anything which undertakes to leave out the cradle. Even her school +education is based on this fact, were it only on Stendhal's theory that +the sons of a woman who reads Gibbon and Schiller will be more likely to +show talent than those of one who only tells her beads and reads Mme. de +Genlis. And so clearly is this understood among us, that, when we ask for +suffrage for woman, it is almost always claimed that she needs it for the +sake of her children. To secure her in her right to them; to give her a +voice in their education; to give her a vote in the government beneath +which they are to live,--these points are seldom omitted in our statement +of her claims. Anything else would be an error.</p> + +<p>But there is an error at the other extreme, which is still greater. A +woman should no more merge herself in her child than in her husband. Yet +we often hear that she should do just this. What is all the public sphere +of woman, it is said,--what good can she do by all her speaking and +writing and action,--compared with that she does by properly training the +soul of one child? It is not easy to see the logic of this claim.</p> + +<p>For what service is that child to render in the universe, except that +he, too, may write and speak and act for that which is good and true? And +if the mother foregoes all this that the child, in growing up, may simply +do what the mother has left undone, the world gains nothing. In +sacrificing her own work to her child's, moreover, she exchanges a present +good for a prospective and merely possible one. If she does this through +overwhelming love, we can hardly blame her; but she cannot justify it +before reason and truth. Her child may die, and the service to mankind be +done by neither. Her child may grow up with talents unlike hers, or with +none at all; as the son of Howard was selfish, the son of Chesterfield a +boor, and the son of Wordsworth in the last degree prosaic.</p> + +<p>Or the special occasion when she might have done great good may have +passed before her boy or girl grows up to do it. If Mrs. Child had refused +to write "An Appeal for that Class of Americans called Africans," or Mrs. +Stowe had laid aside "Uncle Tom's Cabin," or Florence Nightingale had +declined to go to the Crimea, on the ground that a woman's true work was +through the nursery, and they must all wait for that, the consequence +would be that these things would have remained undone. The brave acts of +the world must be performed <i>when occasion offers, by the first brave +soul</i> who feels moved to do them, man or woman.</p> + +<p>If all the children in all the nurseries are thereby helped to do other +brave deeds when their turn comes, so much the better. But when a great +opportunity offers for direct aid to the world, we have no right to +transfer that work to other hands--not even to the hands of our own +children. We must do the work, and train the children besides.</p> + +<p>I am willing to admit, therefore, that the work of education, in any +form, is as great as any other work; but I fail to see why it should be +greater. Usefulness is usefulness: there is no reason why it should be +postponed from generation to generation, or why it is better to rear a +serviceable human being than to be one in person. Carry the theory +consistently out: if each mother must simply rear her daughter that she in +turn may rear somebody else, then from each generation the work will +devolve upon a succeeding generation, so that it will be only the last +woman who will personally do any service, except that of motherhood; and +when her time comes it will be too late for any service at all.</p> + +<p>If it be said, "But some of these children will be men, who are +necessarily of more use than women," I deny the necessity. If it be said, +"The children may be many, and the mother, who is but one, may well be +sacrificed," it might be replied that, as one great act may be worth many +smaller ones, so all the numerous children and grandchildren of a woman +like Lucretia Mott may not collectively equal the usefulness of herself +alone. If she, like many women, had held it her duty to renounce all other +duties and interests from the time her motherhood began, I think that the +world, and even her children, would have lost more than could ever have +been gained by her more complete absorption in the nursery.</p> + +<p>The true theory seems a very simple one. The very fact that during one +half the years of a woman's average life she is made incapable of +child-bearing shows that there are, even for the most prolific and devoted +mothers, duties other than the maternal. Even during the most absorbing +years of motherhood, the wisest women still try to keep up their interest +in society, in literature, in the world's affairs--were it only for their +children's sake. Multitudes of women will never be mothers; and those more +fortunate may find even the usefulness of their motherhood surpassed by +what they do in other ways. If maternal duties interfere in some degree +with all other functions, the same is true, though in a far less degree, +of those of a father. But there are those who combine both spheres. The +German poet Wieland claimed to be the parent of fourteen children and +forty books; and who knows by which parentage he served the world the +best?</p> + +<h2><a name="4-15"></a><a href="#TOC">A GERMAN POINT OF VIEW</a></h2> + +<p>Many Americans will remember the favorable impression made by Professor +Christlieb of Germany, when he attended the meeting of the Evangelical +Alliance in New York some years ago. His writings, like his presence, show +a most liberal spirit; and perhaps no man has ever presented the more +advanced evangelical theology of Germany in so attractive a light. Yet I +heard a story of him the other day, which either showed him in an aspect +quite undesirable, or else gave an unpleasant view of the social position +of women in Germany.</p> + +<p>The story was to the effect that a young American student recently +called on Professor Christlieb with a letter of introduction. The +professor received him cordially, and soon entered into conversation about +the United States. He praised the natural features of the country, and the +enterprising spirit of our citizens, but expressed much solicitude about +the future of the nation. On being asked his reasons, he frankly expressed +his opinion that "the Spirit of Christ" was not here. Being still further +pressed to illustrate his meaning, he gave, as instances of this +deficiency, not the Crédit Mobilier or the Tweed scandal, but such +alarming facts as the following. He seriously declared that, on more than +one occasion, he had heard an American married woman say to her husband, +"Dear, will you bring me my shawl?" and the husband had brought it. He +further had seen a husband return home at evening, and enter the parlor +where his wife was sitting,--perhaps in the very best chair in the +room,--and the wife not only did not go and get his dressing-gown and +slippers, but she even remained seated, and left him to find a chair as he +could. These things, as Professor Christlieb pointed out, suggested a +serious deficiency of the spirit of Christ in the community.</p> + +<p>With our American habits and interpretations, it is hard to see this +matter just as the professor sees it. One would suppose that, if there is +any meaning in the command, "Bear ye one another's burdens, and so fulfil +the law of Christ," a little of such fulfilling might sometimes be good +for the husband, as for the wife. And though it would undoubtedly be more +pleasing to see every wife so eager to receive her husband that she would +naturally spring from her chair and run to kiss him in the doorway, yet, +where such devotion was wanting, it would be but fair to inquire which of +the two had done the more fatiguing day's work, and to whom the easy-chair +justly belonged. The truth is, I suppose, that the good professor's remark +indicated simply a "survival" in his mind, or in his social circle, of a +barbarous tradition, under which the wife of a Mexican herdsman cannot eat +at the table with her "lord and master," and the wife of a German +professor must vacate the best armchair at his approach.</p> + +<p>If so, it is not to be regretted that we in this country have outgrown +a relation so unequal. Nor am I at all afraid that the great Teacher, who, +pointing to the multitude for whom he was soon to die, said of them, +"Whosoever shall do the will of God, the same is my brother and my sister +and my mother," would have objected to any mutual and equal service +between man and woman. If we assume that two human beings have immortal +souls, there can be no want of dignity to either in serving the other. The +greater equality of woman in America seems to be, on this reasoning, a +proof of the presence not the absence, of the spirit of Christ; nor does +Dr. Christlieb seem quite worthy of the beautiful name he bears, if he +feels otherwise.</p> + +<p>But if it is really true that a German professor has to cross the +Atlantic to witness a phenomenon so very simple as that of a lover-like +husband bringing a shawl for his wife, I should say, Let the immigration +from Germany be encouraged as much as possible, in order that even the +most learned immigrants may discover something new.</p> + +<h2><a name="4-16"></a><a href="#TOC">CHILDLESS WOMEN</a></h2> + +<p>It has not always been regarded as a thing creditable to woman that she +was the mother of the human race. On the contrary, the fact was often +mentioned, in the Middle Ages, as a distinct proof of inferiority. The +question was discussed in the mediaeval Council of Maçon, and the +position taken that woman was no more entitled to rank as human, because +she brought forth men, than the garden-earth could take rank with the +fruit and flowers it bore. The same view was revived by a Latin writer of +1595, on the thesis "<i>Mulieres non homines esse</i>," a French +translation of which essay was printed under the title of "<i>Paradoxe sur +les femmes</i>," in 1766. Napoleon Bonaparte used the same image, carrying +it almost as far:--</p> + +<p>"Woman is given to man that she may bear children. Woman is our +property; we are not hers: because she produces children for us; we do not +yield any to her: she is therefore our possession, as the fruit-tree is +that of the gardener."</p> + +<p>Even the fact of parentage, therefore, has been adroitly converted into +a ground of inferiority for women; and this is ostensibly the reason why +lineage has been reckoned, almost everywhere, through the male line only, +ignoring the female; just as, in tracing the seed of some rare fruit, the +gardener takes no genealogical account of the garden where it grew. This +view is now seldom expressed in full force: but one remnant of it is to be +found in the lingering impression, that, at any rate, a woman who is not a +mother is of no account; as worthless as a fruitless garden or a barren +fruit-tree. Created only for a certain object, she is of course valueless +unless that object be fulfilled.</p> + +<p>But the race must have fathers as well as mothers; and if we look for +evidence of public service in great men, it certainly does not always lie +in leaving children to the republic. On the contrary, the rule has rather +seemed to be, that the most eminent men have left their bequest of service +in any form rather than in that of a great family. Recent inquiries into +the matter have brought out some remarkable facts in this regard.</p> + +<p>As a rule, there exist no living descendants in the male line from the +great authors, artists, statesmen, soldiers, of England. It is stated that +there is not one such descendant of Chaucer, Shakespeare, Spenser, Butler, +Dryden, Pope, Cowper, Goldsmith, Scott, Byron, or Moore; not one of Drake, +Cromwell, Monk, Marlborough, Peterborough, or Nelson; not one of +Strafford, Ormond, or Clarendon; not one of Addison, Swift, or Johnson; +not one of Walpole, Bolingbroke, Chatham, Pitt, Fox, Burke, Grattan, or +Canning; not one of Bacon, Locke, Newton, or Davy; not one of Hume, +Gibbon, or Macaulay; not one of Hogarth or Reynolds; not one of Garrick, +John Kemble, or Edmund Kean. It would be easy to make a similar American +list, beginning with Washington, of whom it was said that "Providence made +him childless that his country might call him Father."</p> + +<p>Now, however we may regret that these great men have left little or no +posterity, it does not occur to any one as affording any serious drawback +upon their service to their nation. Certainly it does not occur to us that +they would have been more useful had they left children to the world, but +rendered it no other service. Lord Bacon says that "he that hath wife and +children hath given hostages to fortune; for they are impediments to great +enterprises, either of virtue or mischief. Certainly the best works, and +of greatest merit for the public, have proceeded from the unmarried or +childless men; which, both in affection and means, have married and +endowed the public." And this is the view generally accepted,--that the +public is in such cases rather the gainer than the loser, and has no right +to complain.</p> + +<p>Since, therefore, every child must have a father and a mother both, and +neither will alone suffice, why should we thus heap gratitude on men who +from preference or from necessity have remained childless, and yet +habitually treat women as if they could render no service to their country +except by giving it children? If it be folly and shame, as I think, to +belittle and decry the dignity and worth of motherhood, as some are said +to do, it is no less folly, and shame quite as great, to deny the grand +and patriotic service of many women who have died and left no children +among their mourners. Plato puts into the mouth of a woman,--the eloquent +Diotima, in the "Banquet,"--that, after all, we are more grateful to Homer +and Hesiod for the children of their brain than if they had left human +offspring.</p> + +<h2><a name="4-17"></a><a href="#TOC">THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO +MOTHERS</a></h2> + +<p>From the Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals we have now +advanced to a similar society for the benefit of children. When shall we +have a movement for the prevention of cruelty to mothers?</p> + +<p>A Rhode Island lady, who had never taken any interest in the +woman-suffrage movement, came to me in great indignation the other day, +asking if it was true that under Rhode Island laws a husband might, by his +last will, bequeath his child away from its mother, so that she might, if +the guardian chose, never see it again. I said that it was undoubtedly +true, and that such were still the laws in many States of the Union.</p> + +<p>"But," she said, "it is an outrage. The husband may have been one of +the weakest or worst men in the world; he may have persecuted his wife and +children; he may have made the will in a moment of anger, and have +neglected to alter it. At any rate, he is dead, and the mother is living. +The guardian whom he appoints may turn out a very malicious man, and may +take pleasure in torturing the mother; or he may bring up the children in +a way their mother thinks ruinous for them. Why do not all the mothers cry +out against such a law?"</p> + +<p>"I wish they would," I said. "I have been trying a good many years to +make them understand what the law is; but they do not. People who do not +vote pay no attention to the laws until they suffer from them."</p> + +<p>She went away protesting that she, at least, would not hold her tongue +on the subject, and I hope she will not. The actual text of the law to +which she objected is as follows:--</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>"Every person authorized by law to make a will, except married women, +shall have a right to appoint by his will a guardian or guardians for his +children during their minority."[1]</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>There is not associated with this, in the statute, the slightest clause +in favor of the mother; nor anything which could limit the power of the +guardian by requiring deference to her wishes, although he could, in case +of gross neglect or abuse, be removed by the court, and another guardian +appointed. There is not a line of positive law to protect the mother. Now, +in a case of absolute wrong, a single sentence of law is worth all the +chivalrous courtesy this side of the Middle Ages.</p> + +<p>It is idle to say that such laws are not executed. They are executed. I +have had letters, too agonizing to print, expressing the sufferings of +mothers under laws like these. There lies before me a letter,--not from +Rhode Island,--written by a widowed mother who suffers daily tortures, +even while in possession of her child, at the knowledge that it is not +legally hers, but held only by the temporary permission of the guardian +appointed under her husband's will.</p> + +<p>"I beg you," she says, "to take this will to the hilltop, and urge +law-makers in our next legislature to free the State record from the +shameful story that no mother can control her child unless it is born out +of wedlock."</p> + +<p>"From the moment," she says, "when the will was read to me, I have made +no effort to set it aside. I wait till God reveals his plans, so far as my +own condition is concerned. But out of my keen comprehension of this great +wrong, notwithstanding my submission for myself, my whole soul is +stirred,--for my child, who is a little woman; for all women, that the +laws may be changed which subject a true woman, a devoted wife, a faithful +mother, to such mental agonies as I have endured, and shall endure till I +die."</p> + +<p>In a later letter she says, "I now have his [the guardian's] solemn +promise that he will not remove her from my control. To some extent my +sufferings are allayed; and yet never, till she arrives at the age of +twenty-one, shall I fully trust." I wish that mothers who dwell in +sheltered and happy homes would try to bring to their minds the condition +of a mother whose possession of her only child rests upon the "promise" of +a comparative stranger. We should get beyond the meaningless cry, "I have +all the rights I want," if mothers could only remember that among these +rights, in most States of the Union, the right of a widowed mother to her +child is not included.</p> + +<p>By strenuous effort, the law on this point has in Massachusetts been +gradually amended, till it now stands thus: The father is authorized to +appoint a guardian by will; but the powers of this guardian do not entitle +him to take the child from the mother.</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>"The guardian of a minor ... shall have the custody and tuition of his +ward; and the care and management of all his estate, except that the +father of the minor, if living, and in case of his death the mother, they +being respectively competent to transact their own business, shall be +entitled to the custody of the person of the minor and the care of his +education."[2]</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>Down to 1870 the cruel words "while she remains unmarried" followed the +word "mother" in the above law. Until that time, the mother if remarried +had no claim to the custody of her child, in case the guardian wished +otherwise; and a very painful scene once took place in a Boston +court-room, where children were forced away from their mother by the +officers, under this statute, in spite of her tears and theirs; and this +when no sort of personal charge had been made against her. This could not +now happen in Massachusetts, but it might still happen in some other +States. It is true that men are almost always better than their laws; but +while a bad law remains on the statute-book it gives to any unscrupulous +man the power to be as bad as the law.</p> + +<p>[Footnote 1: Gen. Statutes R.I., chap. 154, sect. 1]</p> + +<p>[Footnote 2: Public Statutes, chap. 139, sect. 4.]</p> + +<center> +<hr class="narrow"> +</center> +<h2 align="center"><a name="5"></a><a href="#TOC">V<br> + SOCIETY</a></h2> + +<blockquote> +<p>"Place the sexes in right relations of mutual respect, and a severe +morality gives that essential charm to woman which educates all that is +delicate, poetic, and self-sacrificing, breeds courtesy and learning, +conversation and wit, in her rough mate; so that I have thought a +sufficient measure of civilization is the influence of good +women."--EMERSON, Society and Solitude, p. 21.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p> </p> + +<h2><a name="5-1"></a><a href="#TOC">FOAM AND CURRENT</a></h2> + +<p>Sometimes, on the beach at Newport, I look at the gayly dressed ladies +in their phaetons, and then at the foam which trembles on the breaking +wave, or lies palpitating in creamy masses on the beach. It is as pretty +as they, as light, as fresh, as delicate, as changing; and no doubt the +graceful foam, if it thinks at all, fancies that it is the chief +consummate product of the ocean, and that the main end of the vast +currents of the mighty deep is to yield a few glittering bubbles like +those. At least, this seems to me what many of the fair ladies think, as +to themselves.</p> + +<p>Here is a nation in which the most momentous social and political +experiment ever tried by man is being worked out, day by day. There is +something ocean-like in the way in which the great currents of life, race, +religion, temperament are here chafing with each other, safe from the +storms through which all monarchical countries may yet have to pass. As +these great currents heave, there are tossed up in every watering-place +and every city in America, as on an ocean beach, certain pretty bubbles of +foam; and each spot, we may suppose, counts its own bubbles brighter than +those of its neighbors, and christens them "society."</p> + +<p>It is an unceasing wonder to a thoughtful person, at any such resort, +to see the unconscious way in which fashionable society accepts the foam, +and ignores the currents. You hear people talk of "a position in society," +"the influential circles in society," as if the position they mean were +not liable to be shifted in a day; as if the essential influences in +America were not mainly to be sought outside the world of fashion. In +other countries it is very different. The circle of social caste, whose +centre you touch in London, radiates to the farthest shores of the British +empire; the upper class controls, not merely fashion, but government; it +rules in country as well as city; genius and wealth are but its +tributaries. Wherever it is not so, it is because England is so far +Americanized. But in America the social prestige of the cities is nothing +in the country; it is a matter of the pavement, of a three-mile +radius.</p> + +<p>Go to the farthest borders of England: there are still the "county +families," and you meet servants in livery. On the other hand, in a little +village in northern New Hampshire, my friend was visited in the evening by +the landlady, who said that several of their "most fashionable ladies" had +happened in, and she would like to show them her guest's bonnet. Then the +different cities ignore each other: the rulers of select circles in New +York may find themselves nobodies in Washington, while a Washington social +passport counts for as little in New York. Boston and Philadelphia affect +to ignore both; and St. Louis and San Francisco have their own standards. +The utmost social prestige in America is local, provincial, a matter of +the square inch: it is as if the foam of each particular beach along the +seacoast were to call itself "society."</p> + +<p>There is something pathetic, therefore, in the unwearied pains taken by +ambitious women to establish a place in some little, local, transitory +domain, to "bring out" their daughters for exhibition on a given evening, +to form a circle for them, to marry them well. A dozen years hence the +millionaires whose notice they seek may be paupers, or these ladies may be +dwelling in some other city, where the visiting cards will bear wholly +different names. How idle to attempt to transport into American life the +social traditions and delusions which require monarchy and primogeniture, +and a standing army, to keep them up--and which cannot always hold their +own in England, even with the aid of these!</p> + +<p>Every woman, like every man, has a natural desire for influence; and if +this instinct yearns, as it often should yearn, to take in more than her +own family, she must seek it somewhere outside. I know women who bring to +bear on the building-up of a frivolous social circle--frivolous, because +it is not really brilliant, but only showy; not really gay, but only +bored-- talent and energy enough to influence the mind and thought of the +nation, if only employed in some effective way. Who are the women of real +influence in America? They are the schoolteachers, through whose hands +each successive American generation has to pass; they are those wives of +public men who share their husbands' labor, and help mould their work; +they are those women who, through their personal eloquence or through the +press, are distinctly influencing the American people in its growth. The +influence of such women is felt for good or for evil in every page they +print, every newspaper column they fill: the individual women may be +unworthy their posts, but it is they who have got hold of the lever, and +gone the right way to work. As American society is constituted, the +largest "social success" that can be attained here is trivial and local; +and you have to "make believe very hard," like that other imaginary +Marchioness, to find in it any career worth mentioning. That is the foam, +but these other women are dealing with the main currents.</p> + +<h2><a name="5-2"></a><a href="#TOC">IN SOCIETY</a></h2> + +<p>One sometimes hears from some lady the remark that very few people "in +society" believe in any movement to enlarge the rights or duties of women. +In a community of more marked social gradations than our own, this +assertion, if true, might be very important; and even here it is worth +considering, because it leads the way to a little social philosophy. Let +us, for the sake of argument, begin by accepting the assumption that there +is an inner circle, at least in our large cities, which claims to be +"society," <i>par excellence</i>. What relation has this favored circle, +if favored it be, to any movement relating to women?</p> + +<p>It has, to begin with, the same relation that "society" has to every +movement of reform. The proportion of smiles and frowns bestowed from this +quarter upon the woman-suffrage movement, for instance, is about that +formerly bestowed upon the anti-slavery agitation: I see no great +difference. In Boston, for example, the names contributed by "society" to +the woman-suffrage festivals are about as numerous as those which used to +be contributed to the anti-slavery bazaars; no more, no less. Indeed, they +are very often the same names; and it has been curious to see, for nearly +fifty years, how radical tendencies have predominated in some of the +well-known Boston families, and conservative tendencies in others.</p> + +<p>The traits of blood seem to outlast successive series of special +reforms. Be this as it may, it is safe to assume, that, as the +anti-slavery movement prevailed with only a moderate amount of sanction +from "our best society," the woman-suffrage agitation, which has at least +an equal amount, has no reason to be discouraged.</p> + +<p>On looking farther, we find that not reforms alone, but often most +important and established institutions, exist and flourish with only +incidental aid from those "in society." Take, for instance, the whole +public school system of our larger cities. Grant that out of twenty ladies +"in society," taken at random, not more than one would personally approve +of women's voting: it is doubtful whether even that proportion of them +would personally favor the public school system so far as to submit their +children, or at least their girls, to it. Yet the public schools flourish, +and give a better training than most private schools, in spite of this +inert practical resistance from those "in society." The natural inference +would seem to be, that if an institution so well established as the public +schools, and so generally recognized, can afford to be ignored by +"society," then certainly a wholly new reform must expect no better +fate.</p> + +<p>As a matter of fact, I apprehend that what is called "society," in the +sense of the more fastidious or exclusive social circle in any community, +exists for one sole object,--the preservation of good manners and social +refinements. For this purpose it is put very largely under the sway of +women, who have, all the world over, a better instinct for these important +things. It is true that "society" is apt to do even this duty very +imperfectly, and often tolerates, and sometimes even cultivates, just the +rudeness and discourtesy that it is set to cure. Nevertheless, this is its +mission; but so soon as it steps beyond this, and attempts to claim any +special weight outside the sphere of good manners, it shows its weakness, +and must yield to stronger forces.</p> + +<p>One of these stronger forces is religion, which should train men and +women to a far higher standard than "society" alone can teach. This +standard should be embodied, theoretically, in the Christian Church; but +unhappily "society" is too often stronger than this embodiment, and turns +the church itself into a mere temple of fashion. Other opposing forces are +known as science and common-sense, which is only science written in +shorthand. On some of these various forces all reforms are based, the +woman-suffrage reform among them. If it could really be shown that some +limited social circle was opposed to this, then the moral would seem to +be, "So much the worse for the social circle." It used to be thought in +anti-slavery days that one of the most blessed results of that agitation +was the education it gave to young men and women who would otherwise have +merely grown up "in society," but were happily taken in hand by a stronger +influence. It is Goethe who suggests, when discussing Hamlet in "Wilhelm +Meister," that, if an oak be planted in a flower-pot, it will be worse in +the end for the flower-pot than for the tree. And to those who watch, year +after year, the young human seedlings planted "in society," the main point +of interest lies in the discovery which of these are likely to grow into +oaks.</p> + +<p>But the truth is that the very use of the word "society" in this sense +is narrow and misleading. We Americans are fortunate enough to live in a +larger society, where no conventional position or family traditions exert +an influence that is to be in the least degree compared with the influence +secured by education, energy, and character. No matter how fastidious the +social circle, one is constantly struck with the limitations of its +influence, and with the little power exerted by its members as compared +with that which may easily be wielded by tongue and pen. No merely +fashionable woman in New York, for instance, has a position sufficiently +important to be called influential compared with that of a woman who can +speak in public so as to command hearers, or can write so as to secure +readers. To be at the head of a normal school, or to be a professor in a +college where co-education prevails, is to have a sway over the destinies +of America which reduces all mere "social position" to a matter of cards +and compliments and page's buttons.</p> + +<h2><a name="5-3"></a><a href="#TOC">THE BATTLE OF THE CARDS</a></h2> + +<p>The great winter's contest of the visiting-cards recommences at the end +of every autumn. Suspended during the summer, or only renewed at Newport +and such thoroughbred and thoroughly sophisticated haunts, it will set in +with fury in the habitable regions of our cities before the snow falls. +Now will the atmosphere of certain streets and squares be darkened--or +whitened--at the appointed hour by the shower of pasteboard transmitted +from dainty kid-gloved hands to the cotton-gloved hands of "John," and +destined through him to reach the possibly gloveless hands of some other +John, who stands obsequious in the doorway. Now will every lady, after +John has slammed the door, drive happily on to some other door, +rearranging, as she goes, her display of cards, laid as if for a game on +the opposite seat of her carriage, and dealt perhaps in four suits,--her +own cards, her daughters', her husband's, her "Mr. and Mrs." cards, and +who knows how many more? With all this ammunition, what a very +<i>mitrailleuse</i> of good society she becomes; what an accumulation of +polite attentions she may discharge at any door! That one well-appointed +woman, as she sits in her carriage, represents the total visiting power of +self, husband, daughters, and possibly a son or two beside. She has all +their counterfeit presentments in her hands. How happy she is! and how +happy will the others be on her return, to think that dear mamma has +disposed of so many dear, beloved, tiresome, social foes that morning! It +will be three months at least, they think, before the A's and the B's and +the C's will have to be "done" again.</p> + +<p>Ah! but who knows how soon these fatiguing letters of the alphabet, +rallying to the defence, will come, pasteboard in hand, to return the +onset? In this contest, fair ladies, "there are blows to take as well as +blows to give," in the words of the immortal Webster. Some day, on +returning, you will find a half-dozen cards on your own table that will +undo all this morning's work, and send you forth on the warpath again. Is +it not like a campaign? It is from this subtle military analogy, +doubtless, that when gentlemen happen to quarrel, in the very best +society, they exchange cards as preliminary to a duel; and that, when +French journalists fight, all other French journalists show their sympathy +for the survivor by sending him their cards. When we see, therefore, these +heroic ladies riding forth in the social battle's magnificently stern +array, our hearts render them the homage due to the brave. When we +consider how complex their military equipment has grown, we fancy each of +these self-devoted mothers to be an Arnold Winkelried, receiving in her +martyr-breast the points of a dozen different cards, and shouting, "Make +way for liberty!" For is it not securing liberty to have cleared off a +dozen calls from your list, and found nobody at home?</p> + +<p>If this sort of thing goes on, who can tell where the paper warfare +shall end? If ladies may leave cards for their husbands, who are never +seen out of Wall Street, except when they are seen at their clubs; or for +their sons, who never forsake their billiards or their books,--why can +they not also leave them for their ancestors, or for their remotest +posterity? Who knows but people may yet drop cards in the names of the +grandchildren whom they only wish for, or may reconcile hereditary feuds +by interchanging pasteboard in behalf of two hostile grandparents who died +half a century ago?</p> + +<p>And there is another social observance in which the introduction of the +card system may yet be destined to save much labor,--the attendance on +fashionable churches. Already, it is said, a family may sometimes +reconcile devout observance with a late breakfast, by stationing the +family carriage near the church-door--empty. Really, it would not be a +much emptier observance to send the cards alone by the footman; and +doubtless in the progress of civilization we shall yet reach that point. +It will have many advantages. The <i>effete</i> of society, as some cruel +satirist has called them, may then send their orisons on pasteboard to as +many different shrines as they approve; thus insuring their souls, as it +were, at several different offices. Church architecture may be simplified, +for it will require nothing but a card-basket. The clergyman will +celebrate his solemn ritual, and will then look in that convenient +receptacle for the names of his fellow-worshippers, as a fine lady, after +her "reception," looks over the cards her footman hands her, to know which +of her dear friends she has been welcoming. Religion, as well as social +proprieties, will glide smoothly over a surface of glazed pasteboard; and +it will be only very humble Christians, indeed, who will do their +worshipping in person, and will hold to the worn-out and obsolete practice +of "No Cards."</p> + +<h2><a name="5-4"></a><a href="#TOC">SOME WORKING-WOMEN</a></h2> + +<p>It is almost a stereotyped remark, that the women of the more +fashionable and worldly class, in America, are indolent, idle, incapable, +and live feeble and lazy lives. It has always seemed to me that, on the +contrary, they are compelled, by the very circumstances of their +situation, to lead very laborious lives, requiring great strength and +energy. Whether many of their pursuits are frivolous, is a different +question; but that they are arduous, I do not see how any one can doubt. I +think it can be easily shown that the common charges against American +fashionable women do not hold against the class I describe.</p> + +<p>There is, for instance, the charge of evading the cares of +housekeeping, and of preferring a boarding-house or hotel. But no woman +with high aims in the world of fashion can afford to relieve herself from +household cares in this way, except as an exceptional or occasional thing. +She must keep house in order to have entertainments, to form a circle, to +secure a position. The law of give and take is as absolute in society as +in business; and the very first essential to social position in our larger +cities is a household and a hospitality of one's own. It is far more +practicable for a family of high rank in England to live temporarily in +lodgings in London, than for any family with social aspirations to do the +same in New York. The married woman who seeks a position in the world of +society must, therefore, keep house.</p> + +<p>And, with housekeeping, there comes at once to the American woman a +world of care far beyond that of her European sisters.</p> + +<p>Abroad, everything in domestic life is systematized; and services of +any grade, up to that of housekeeper or steward, can be secured for money, +and for a moderate amount of that. The mere amount of money might not +trouble the American woman; but where to get the service? Such a thing as +a trained housekeeper, who can undertake, at any salary, to take the work +off the shoulders of the lady of the house,--such a thing America hardly +affords. Without this, the multiplication of servants only increaseth +sorrow; the servants themselves are often but an undisciplined mob, and +the lady of the house is like a general attempting to drill his whole +command personally, without the aid of a staff-officer or so much as a +sergeant. For an occasional grand entertainment, she can, perhaps, import +a special force; some fashionable sexton can arrange her invitations, and +some genteel caterer her supper. But for the daily routine of the +household--guests, children, door-bell, equipage--there is one vast, +constant toil every day; and the woman who would have these things done +well must give her own orders, and discipline her own retinue. The husband +may have no "business," his wealth may supersede the necessity of all toil +beyond daily billiards; but for the wife wealth means business, and the +more complete the social triumph, the more overwhelming the daily +toil.</p> + +<p>For instance, I know a fair woman in an Atlantic city who is at the +head of a household including six children and nine servants. The whole +domestic management is placed absolutely in her hands: she engages or +dismisses every person employed, incurs every expense, makes every +purchase, and keeps all the accounts; her husband only ordering the fuel, +directing the affairs of the stable, and drawing checks for the bills. +Every hour of her morning is systematically appropriated to these things. +Among other things, she has to provide for nine meals a day; in +dining-room, kitchen, and nursery, three each. Then she has to plan her +social duties, and to drive out, exquisitely dressed, to make her calls. +Then there are constantly dinner-parties and evening entertainments; she +reads a little, and takes lessons in one or two languages. Meanwhile her +husband has for daily occupation his books, his club, and the +above-mentioned light and easy share in the cares of the household. Many +men in his position do not even keep an account of personal +expenditures.</p> + +<p>There is nothing exceptional in this lady's case, except that the work +may be better done than usual: the husband could not well contribute more +than his present share without hurting domestic discipline; nor does the +wife do all this from pleasure, but in a manner from necessity. It is the +condition of her social position: to change it, she must withdraw herself +from her social world. A few improvements, such as "family hotels," are +doing something to relieve this class to whom luxury means labor. The +great undercurrent which is sweeping us all toward some form of associated +life is as obvious in this new improvement in housekeeping, as in +coöperative stores or trades-unions; but it will nevertheless be long +before the "women of society" in America can be anything but a +hard-working class.</p> + +<p>The question is not whether such a life as I have described is the +ideal life. My point is that it is, at any rate, a life demanding far more +of energy and toil, at least in America, than the men of the same class +are called upon to exhibit. There is growing up a class of men of leisure +in America; but there are no women of leisure in the same circle. They +hold their social position on condition of "an establishment," and an +establishment makes them working-women. One result is the constant exodus +of this class to Europe, where domestic life is just now easier. Another +consequence is that you hear woman suffrage denounced by women of this +class, not on the ground that it involves any harder work than they +already do, but on the ground that they have work enough already, and will +not bear the suggestion of any more.</p> + +<h2><a name="5-5"></a><a href="#TOC">THE EMPIRE OF MANNERS</a></h2> + +<p>I was present at a lively discourse, administered by a young lady just +from Europe to a veteran politician. "It is of very little consequence," +she said, "what kind of men you send out as foreign ministers. The thing +of real importance is that they should have the right kind of wives. Any +man can sign a treaty, I suppose, if you tell him what kind of treaty it +must be. But all his social relations with the nations to which you send +him will depend on his wife." There was some truth, certainly, in this +audacious conclusion. It reminded me of the saying of a modern thinker, +"The only empire freely conceded to women is that of manners,--but it is +worth all the rest put together."</p> + +<p>Every one instinctively feels that the graces and amenities of life +must be largely under the direction of women. The fact that this feeling +has been carried too far, and has led to the dwarfing of women's +intellect, must not lead to a rejection of this important social sphere. +It is too strong a power to be ignored. George Eliot says well that "the +commonest man, who has his ounce of sense and feeling, is conscious of the +difference between a lovely, delicate woman, and a coarse one. Even a dog +feels a difference in their presence." At a summer resort, for instance, +one sees women who may be intellectually very ignorant and narrow, yet +whose mere manners give them a social power which the highest intellects +might envy. To lend joy and grace to all one's little world of friendship; +to make one's house a place which every guest enters with eagerness, and +leaves with reluctance; to lend encouragement to the timid, and ease to +the awkward; to repress violence, restrain egotism, and make even +controversy courteous,--these belong to the empire of woman. It is a +sphere so important and so beautiful, that even courage and self-devotion +seem not quite enough, without the addition of this supremest charm.</p> + +<p>This courtesy is so far from implying falsehood, that its very best +basis is perfect simplicity. Given a naturally sensitive organization, a +loving spirit, and the early influence of a refined home, and the +foundation of fine manners is secured. A person so favored may be reared +in a log hut, and may pass easily into a palace; the few needful +conventionalities are so readily acquired. But I think it is a mistake to +tell children, as we sometimes do, that simplicity and a kind heart are +absolutely all that are needful in the way of manners. There are persons +in whom simplicity and kindness are inborn, and who yet never attain to +good manners for want of refined perceptions. And it is astonishing how +much refinement alone can do, even if it be not very genuine or very full +of heart, to smooth the paths and make social life attractive.</p> + +<p>All the acute observers have recognized the difference between the +highest standard, which is nature's, and that next to the highest, which +is art's. George Eliot speaks of that fine polish which is "the expensive +substitute for simplicity," and Tennyson says of manners,--</p> + +<p>"Kind nature's are the best: those next to best That fit us like a +nature second-hand; Which are indeed the manners of the great."</p> + +<p>In our own national history we have learned to recognize that the +personal demeanor of women may be a social and political force. The +slave-power owed much of its prolonged control at Washington, and the +larger part of its favor in Europe, to the fact that the manners of +Southern women had been more sedulously trained than those of Northern +women. Even at this moment, one may see at any watering-place that the +relative social influence of different cities does not depend upon the +intellectual training of their women, so much as on the manners. And, even +if this is very unreasonable, the remedy would seem to be, not to go about +lecturing on the intrinsic superiority of the Muses to the Graces, but to +pay due homage at all the shrines.</p> + +<p>It is a great deal to ask of reformers, especially, that they should be +ornamental as well as useful; and I would by no means indorse the views of +a lady who once told me that she was ready to adopt the most radical views +of the women-reformers if she could see one well-dressed woman who +accepted them. The place where we should draw the line between +independence and deference, between essentials and non-essentials, between +great ideas and little courtesies, will probably never be +determined--except by actual examples. Yet it is safe to fall back on Miss +Edgeworth's maxim in "Helen," that "Every one who makes goodness +disagreeable commits high treason against virtue." And it is not a +pleasant result of our good deeds, that others should be immediately +driven into bad deeds by the burning desire to be unlike us.</p> + +<h2><a name="5-6"></a><a href="#TOC">GIRLSTEROUSNESS</a></h2> + +<p>They tell the story of a little boy, a young scion of the house of +Beecher, that, on being rebuked for some noisy proceeding, in which his +little sister had also shared, he claimed that she also should be included +in the indictment. "If a boy makes too much noise," he said, "you tell him +he mustn't be boisterous. Well, then, when a girl makes just as much +noise, you ought to tell her not to be so <i>girlsterous</i>."</p> + +<p>I think that we should accept, with a sense of gratitude, this addition +to the language. It supplies a name for a special phase of feminine +demeanor, inevitably brought out of modern womanhood. Any transitional +state of society develops some evil with the good. Good results are +unquestionably proceeding from the greater freedom now allowed to women. +The drawback is that we are developing, here and now, more of +"girlsterousness" than is apt to be seen in less enlightened +countries.</p> + +<p>The more complete the subjection of woman, the more "subdued" in every +sense she is. The typical woman of savage life is, at least in youth, +gentle, shy, retiring, timid. A Bedouin woman is modest and humble; an +Indian girl has a voice "gentle and low." The utmost stretch of the +imagination cannot picture either of them as "girlsterous." That perilous +quality can only come as woman is educated, self-respecting, emancipated. +"Girlsterousness" is the excess attendant on that virtue, the shadow which +accompanies that light. It is more visible in England than in France, in +America than in England.</p> + +<p>It is to be observed, that, if a girl wishes to be noisy, she can be as +noisy as anybody. Her noise, if less clamorous, is more shrill and +penetrating. The shrieks of schoolgirls, playing in the yard at +recess-time, seem to drown the voices of the boys. As you enter an evening +party, it is the women's tones you hear most conspicuously. There is no +defect in the organ, but at least an adequate vigor. In travelling by +rail, when sitting near some rather underbred party of youths and damsels, +I have commonly noticed that the girls were the noisiest. The young men +appeared more regardful of public opinion, and looked round with +solicitude, lest they should attract too much attention. It is +"girlsterousness" that dashes straight on, regardless of all observers. Of +course reformers exhibit their full share of this undesirable quality. +Where the emancipation of women is much discussed in any circle, some +young girls will put it in practice gracefully and with dignity, others +rudely. Yet even the rudeness may be but a temporary phase, and at last +end well. When women were being first trained as physicians, years ago, I +remember a young girl who came from a Southern State to a Northern city, +and attended the medical lectures. Having secured her lecture-tickets, she +also bought season-tickets to the theatre and to the pistol-gallery, laid +in a box of cigars, and began her professional training. If she meant it +as a satire on the pursuits of the young gentlemen around her, it was not +without point. But it was, I suppose, a clear case of "girlsterousness;" +and I dare say that she sowed her wild oats much more innocently than many +of her male contemporaries, and that she has long since become a sedate +matron. But I certainly cannot commend her as a model.</p> + +<p>Yet I must resolutely deny that any sort of hoydenishness or indecorum +is an especial characteristic of radicals, or even "provincials," as a +class. Some of the fine ladies who would be most horrified at the +"girlsterousness" of this young maiden would themselves smoke their +cigarettes in much worse company, morally speaking, than she ever +tolerated. And, so far as manners are concerned, I am bound to say that +the worst cases of rudeness and ill-breeding that have ever come to my +knowledge have not occurred in the "rural districts," or among the lower +ten thousand, but in those circles of America where the whole aim in life +might seem to be the cultivation of its elegances.</p> + +<p>And what confirms me in the fear that the most profound and serious +types of this disease are not to be found in the wildcat regions is the +fact that so much of it is transplanted to Europe, among those who have +the money to travel. It is there described broadly as "Americanism;" and, +so surely as any peculiarly shrill group is heard coming through a +European picture-gallery, it is straightway classed by all observers as +belonging to the great Republic. If the observers are enamoured at sight +with the beauty of the young ladies of the party, they excuse the +voices;</p> + +<p> "Strange or wild, or madly gay, They call it +only pretty Fanny's way."</p> + +<p>But other observers are more apt to call it only Columbia's way; and if +they had ever heard the word "girlsterousness," they would use that +too.</p> + +<p>Emerson says, "A gentleman makes no noise; a lady is serene." If we +Americans often violate this perfect maxim of good manners, it is +something that America has, at least, furnished the maxim. And, between +Emerson and "girlsterousness," our courteous philosopher may yet carry the +day.</p> + +<h2><a name="5-7"></a><a href="#TOC">ARE WOMEN NATURAL +ARISTOCRATS?</a></h2> + +<p>A clergyman's wife in England has lately set on foot a reform movement +in respect to dress; and, like many English reformers, she aims chiefly to +elevate the morals and manners of the lower classes, without much +reference to her own social equals. She proposes that "no servant, under +pain of dismissal, shall wear flowers, feathers, brooches, buckles or +clasps, earrings, lockets, neck-ribbons, velvets, kid gloves, parasols, +sashes, jackets, or trimming of any kind on dresses, and, above all, no +crinoline; no pads to be worn, or frisettes, or <i>chignons</i>, or +hair-ribbons. The dress is to be gored and made just to touch the ground, +and the hair to be drawn closely to the head, under a round white cap, +without trimming of any kind. The same system of dress is recommended for +Sunday-school girls, schoolmistresses, church-singers, and the lower +orders generally."</p> + +<p>The remark is obvious, that in this country such a course of discipline +would involve the mistress, not the maid, in the "pain of dismissal." The +American clergyman and clergyman's wife who should even "recommend" such a +costume to a schoolmistress, church-singer, or Sunday-school girl,--to say +nothing of the rest of the "lower orders,"--would soon find themselves +without teachers, without pupils, without a choir, and probably without a +parish. It is a comfort to think that even in older countries there is +less and less of this impertinent interference: the costume of different +ranks is being more and more assimilated; and the incidental episode of a +few liveries in our cities is not enough to interfere with the general +current. Never yet, to my knowledge, have I seen even a livery worn by a +white native American; and to restrain the Sunday bonnets of her +handmaidens, what lady has attempted?</p> + +<p>This is as it should be. The Sunday bonnet of the Irish damsel is only +the symbol of a very proper effort to obtain her share of all social +advantages. Long may those ribbons wave! Meanwhile I think the fact that +it is easier for the gentleman of the house to control the dress of his +groom than for the lady to dictate that of her waiting-maid,--this must +count against the theory that it is women who are the natural +aristocrats.</p> + +<p>Women are no doubt more sensitive than men upon matters of taste and +breeding. This is partly from a greater average fineness of natural +perception, and partly because their more secluded lives give them less of +miscellaneous contact with the world. If Maud Muller and her husband had +gone to board at the same boarding-house with the Judge and his wife, that +lady might have held aloof from the rustic bride, simply from inexperience +in life, and not knowing just how to approach her. But the Judge, who +might have been talking politics or real estate with the young farmer on +the doorsteps that morning, would certainly find it easier to deal with +him as a man and a brother at the dinner-table. From these different +causes women get the credit or discredit of being more aristocratic than +men are; so that in England the Tory supporters of female suffrage base it +on the ground that these new voters at least will be conservative.</p> + +<p>But, on the other hand, it is women, even more than men, who are +attracted by those strong qualities of personal character which are always +the antidote to aristocracy. No bold revolutionist ever defied the +established conventionalisms of his times without drawing his strongest +support from women. Poet and novelist love to depict the princess as won +by the outlaw, the gypsy, the peasant. Women have a way of turning from +the insipidities and proprieties of life to the wooer who has the stronger +hand; from the silken Darnley to the rude Bothwell. This impulse is the +natural corrective to the aristocratic instincts of womanhood; and though +men feel it less, it is still, even among them, one of the supports of +republican institutions. We need to keep always balanced between the two +influences of refined culture and of native force. The patrician class, +wherever there is one, is pretty sure to be the more refined; the plebeian +class, the more energetic. That woman is able to appreciate both elements +is proof that she is quite capable of doing her share in social and +political life. This English clergyman's wife, who devotes her soul to the +trimmings and gored skirts of the lower orders, is no more entitled to +represent her sex than are those ladies who give their whole attention to +the "novel and intricate bonnets" advertised this season on Broadway.</p> + +<h2><a name="5-8"></a><a href="#TOC">MRS. BLANK'S DAUGHTERS</a></h2> + +<p>Mrs. Blank, of Far West--let us not draw her from the "sacred privacy +of woman" by giving the name or place too precisely--has an insurmountable +objection to woman's voting. So the newspapers say; and this objection is +that she does not wish her daughters to encounter disreputable characters +at the polls.</p> + +<p>It is a laudable desire, to keep one's daughters from the slightest +contact with such persons. But how does Mrs. Blank precisely mean to +accomplish this? Will she shut up the maidens in a harem? When they go +out, will she send messengers through the streets to bid people hide their +faces, as when an Oriental queen is passing? Will she send them travelling +on camels, veiled by <i>yashmaks?</i> Will she prohibit them from being so +much as seen by a man, except when a physician must be called for their +ailments, and Miss Blank puts her arm through a curtain, in order that he +may feel her pulse and know no more?</p> + +<p>Who is Mrs. Blank, and how does she bring up her daughters? Does she +send them to the post-office? If so, they may wait a half-hour at a time +for the mail to open, and be elbowed by the most disreputable characters, +waiting at their side. If it does the young ladies no harm to encounter +this for the sake of getting their letters out, will it harm them to do it +in order to get their ballots in? If they go to hear a concert they may be +kept half an hour at the door, elbowed by saint and sinner +indiscriminately. If they go to Washington to the President's +inauguration, they may stand two hours with Mary Magdalen on one side of +them and Judas Iscariot on the other. If this contact is rendered harmless +by the fact that they are receiving political information, will it hurt +them to stay five minutes longer in order to act upon the knowledge they +have received?</p> + +<p>This is on the supposition that the household of Blank are plain, +practical women, unversed in the vanities of the world. If they belong to +fashionable circles, how much harder to keep them wholly clear of +disreputable contact! Should they, for instance, visit Newport, they may +possibly be seen at the Casino, looking very happy as they revolve rapidly +in the arms of some very disreputable characters; they will be seen in the +surf, attired in the most scanty and clinging drapery, and kindly aided to +preserve their balance by the devoted attentions of the same companions. +Mrs. Blank, meanwhile, will look complacently on, with the other matrons: +they are not supposed to know the current reputation of those whom their +daughters meet "in society;" and, so long as there is no actual harm done, +why should they care? Very well; but why, then, should they care if they +encounter those same disreputable characters when they go to drop a ballot +in the ballot-box? It will be a more guarded and distant meeting. It is +not usual to dance round-dances at the ward-room, so far as I know, or to +bathe in clinging drapery at that rather dry and dusty resort. If such +very close intimacies are all right under the gas-light or at the beach, +why should there be poison in merely passing near a disreputable character +at the City Hall?</p> + +<p>On the whole, the prospects of Mrs. Blank are not encouraging. Should +she consult a physician for her daughters, he may be secretly or openly +disreputable; should she call in a clergyman, he may, though a bishop, +have carnal rather than spiritual eyes. If Miss Blank be caught in a +shower, she may take refuge under the umbrella of an undesirable +acquaintance; should she fall on the ice, the woman who helps to raise her +may have sinned. There is not a spot in any known land where a woman can +live in absolute seclusion from all contact with evil. Should the Misses +Blank even turn Roman Catholics, and take to a convent, their very +confessor may not be a genuine saint; and they may be glad to flee for +refuge to the busy, buying, selling, dancing, voting world outside.</p> + +<p>No: Mrs. Blank's prayers for absolute protection will never be +answered, in respect to her daughters. Why not, then, find a better model +for prayer in that made by Jesus for his disciples: "I pray Thee, not that +Thou shouldst take them out of the world, but that Thou shouldst keep them +from the evil." A woman was made for something nobler in the world, Mrs. +Blank, than to be a fragile toy, to be put behind a glass case, and +protected from contact. It is not her mission to be hidden away from all +life's evil, but bravely to work that the world may be reformed.</p> + +<h2><a name="5-9"></a><a href="#TOC">THE EUROPEAN PLAN</a></h2> + +<p>Every mishap among American women brings out renewed suggestions of +what may be called the "European plan" in the training of young +girls,--the plan, that is, of extreme seclusion and helplessness. It is +usually forgotten, in these suggestions, that not much protection is +really given anywhere to this particular class as a whole. Everywhere in +Europe the restrictions are of caste, not of sex. Even in Turkey, +travellers tell us, women of the humbler vocations are not much secluded. +It is not the object of the "European plan," in any form, to protect the +virtue of young women, as such, but only of young ladies; and the +protection is pretty effectually limited to that order. Among the +Portuguese in the island of Fayal I found it to be the ambition of each +humble family to bring up one daughter in a sort of lady-like seclusion: +she never went into the street alone, or without a hood which was +equivalent to a veil; she was taught indoor industries only; she was +constantly under the eye of her mother. But in order that one daughter +might be thus protected, all the other daughters were allowed to go alone, +day or evening, bareheaded or bare-footed, by the loneliest +mountain-paths, to bring oranges or firewood or whatever their work may +be--heedless of protection. The safeguard was for a class: the average +exposure of young womanhood was far greater than with us. So in London, +while you rarely see a young lady alone in the streets, the housemaid is +sent on errands at any hour of the evening with a freedom at which our +city domestics would quite rebel; and one has to stay but a short time in +Paris to see how entirely limited to a class is the alleged restraint +under which young French girls are said to be kept.</p> + +<p>Again, it is to be remembered that the whole "European plan," so far as +it is applied on the continent of Europe, is a plan based upon utter +distrust and suspicion, not only as to chastity, but as to all other +virtues. It is applied among the higher classes almost as consistently to +boys as to girls. In every school under church auspices, it is the French +theory that boys are never to be left unwatched for a moment; and it is as +steadily assumed that girls will be untruthful if left to themselves, as +that they will do every other wrong. This to the Anglo-Saxon race seems +very demoralizing. "Suspicion," said Sir Philip Sidney, "is the way to +lose that which we fear to lose." Readers of the Bronte novels will +remember the disgust of the English pupils and teachers in French schools +at the constant espionage around them; and I have more than once heard +young girls who had been trained at such institutions say that it was a +wonder if they had any truthfulness left, so invariable was the assumption +that it was the nature of young girls to lie. I cannot imagine anything +less likely to create upright and noble character, in man or woman, than +the systematic application of the "European plan."</p> + +<p>And that it produces just the results that might be feared, the whole +tone of European literature proves. Foreigners, no doubt, do habitual +injustice to the morality of French households; but it is impossible that +fiction can utterly misrepresent the community which produces and reads +it. When one thinks of the utter lightness of tone with which breaches, +both of truth and chastity, are treated even in the better class of French +novels and plays, it seems absurd to deny the correctness of the picture. +Besides, it is not merely a question of plays and novels. Consider, for +instance, the contempt with which Taine treats Thackeray for representing +the mother of Pendennis as suffering agonies when she thinks that her son +has seduced a young girl, a social inferior. Thackeray is not really +considered a model of elevated tone, as to such matters, among English +writers; but the Frenchman is simply amazed that the Englishman should +describe even the saintliest of mothers as attaching so much weight to +such a small affair.</p> + +<p>An able newspaper writer, quoted with apparent approval by the "Boston +Daily Advertiser," praises the supposed foreign method for the "habit of +dependence and deference" that it produces; and because it gives to a +young man a wife whose "habit of deference is established." But it must be +remembered, that, where this theory is established, the habit of deference +is logically carried much farther than mere conjugal convenience would +take it. Its natural outcome is the authority of the priest, not of the +husband. That domination of the women of France by the priesthood which +forms even now the chief peril of the republic--which is the strength of +legitimism and imperialism and all other conspiracies against the liberty +of the French people--is only the visible and inevitable result of this +dangerous docility.</p> + +<p>One thing is certain, that the best preparation for freedom is freedom; +and that no young girls are so poorly prepared for American life as those +whose early years are passed in Europe. Some of the worst imprudences, the +most unmaidenly and offensive actions, that I have ever heard of in decent +society, have been on the part of young women educated abroad, who have +been launched into American life without its early training,--have been +treated as children until they suddenly awakened to the freedom of women. +On the other hand, I remember with pleasure, that a cultivated French +mother, whose daughter's fine qualities were the best seal of her +motherhood, once told me that the models she had chosen in her daughter's +training were certain families of American young ladies, of whom she had, +through peculiar circumstances, seen much in Paris.</p> + +<h2><a name="5-10"></a><a href="#TOC"></a></h2> + +<p>One of the most amusing letters ever quoted in any book is that given +in Curzon's "Monasteries of the Levant," as the production of a Turkish +sultana who had just learned English. It is as follows:--</p> + +<blockquote> +<p align="center">NOTE FROM ADILE SULTANA, THE BETROTHED OF ABBAS PASHA, +TO HER ARMENIAN COMMISSIONER.</p> + +<p align="right">CONSTANTINOPLE, 1844.</p> + +<p>MY NOBLE FRIEND:--Here are the featherses sent my soul, my noble +friend, are there no other featherses leaved in the shop besides these +featherses? and these featherses remains, and these featherses are ukly. +They are very dear, who buyses dheses? And my noble friend, we want a noat +from yourself; those you brought last tim, those you sees were very +beautiful; we had searched; my soul, I want featherses again, of those +featherses. In Kalada there is plenty of feather. Whatever bees, I only +want beautiful featherses; I want featherses of every desolation +to-morrow.</p> + +<p align="right">(Signed) YOU KNOW WHO.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>The first steps in culture do not, then, it seems, remove from the +feminine soul the love of pretty things. Nor do the later steps wholly +extinguish it; for did not Grace Greenwood hear the learned Mary +Somerville conferring with the wise Harriet Martineau as to whether a +certain dress should be dyed to match a certain shawl? Well! why not? +Because women learn the use of the quill, are they to ignore "featherses +"? Because they learn science, must they unlearn the arts, and, above all, +the art of being beautiful? If men have lost it, they have reason to +regret the loss. Let women hold to it, while yet within their reach.</p> + +<p>Mrs. Rachel Rowland of New Bedford, much prized and trusted as a public +speaker among Friends, and a model of taste and quiet beauty in costume, +delighted the young girls at a Newport Yearly Meeting, a few years since, +by boldly declaring that she thought God meant women to make the world +beautiful, as much as flowers and butterflies, and that there was no sin +in tasteful dress, but only in devoting to it too much money or too much +time. It is a blessed doctrine. The utmost extremes of dress, the love of +colors, of fabrics, of jewels, of "featherses," are, after all, but an +effort after the beautiful. The reason why the beautiful is not always the +result is because so many women are ignorant or merely imitative. They +have no sense of fitness: the short wear what belongs to the tall, and +brunettes sacrifice their natural beauty to look like blondes. Or they +have no adaptation; and even an emancipated woman may show a disregard for +appropriateness, as where a fine lady sweeps the streets, or a fair orator +the platform, with a silken or velvet train which accords only with a +carpet as luxurious as itself. What is inappropriate is never beautiful. +What is merely in the fashion is never beautiful. But who does not know +some woman whose taste and training are so perfect that fashion becomes to +her a means of grace instead of a despot, and the worst excrescence that +can be prescribed--a <i>chignon</i>, a hoop, a panier--is softened into +something so becoming that even the Parisian bondage seems but a chain of +roses?</p> + +<p>In such hands, even "featherses" become a fine art, not a matter of +vanity. Are women so much more vain than men? No doubt they talk more +about their dress, for there is much more to talk about; yet did you never +hear the men of fashion discuss boots and hats and the liveries of grooms? +A good friend of mine, a shoemaker, who supplies very high heels for a +great many pretty feet on Fifth Avenue in New York, declares that women +are not so vain in that direction as men. "A man who thinks he has a +handsome foot," quoth our fashionable Crispin, "is apt to give us more +trouble than any lady among our customers. I have noticed this for twenty +years." The testimony is consoling--to women.</p> + +<p>And this naturally suggests the question, What is to be the future of +masculine costume? Is the present formlessness and gracelessness and +monotony of hue to last forever, as suited to the rough needs of a +workaday world? It is to be remembered that the difference in this respect +between the dress of the sexes is a very recent thing. Till within a +century or so, men dressed as picturesquely as women, and paid as minute +attention to their costume. Even the fashions in armor varied as +extensively as the fashions in gowns. One of Henry III.'s courtiers, Sir +J. Arundel, had fifty-two complete suits of cloth of gold. No satin, no +velvet, was too elegant for those who sat to Copley for their pictures. In +Puritan days the laws could hardly be made severe enough to prevent men +from wearing silver-lace and "broad bone-lace," and shoulder-bands of +undue width, and double ruffs and "immoderate great breeches." What seemed +to the Cavaliers the extreme of stupid sobriety in dress would pass now +for the most fantastic array. Fancy Samuel Pepys going to a wedding of +to-day in his "new colored silk suit and coat trimmed with gold buttons, +and gold broad lace round his hands, very rich and fine." It would give to +the ceremony the aspect of a fancy ball; yet how much prettier a sight is +a fancy ball than the ordinary entertainment of the period!</p> + +<p>At intervals the rigor of masculine costume is a little relaxed; +velvets resume their picturesque sway: and, instead of the customary suit +of solemn black, gentlemen even appear in blue and gold editions at +evening parties. Let us hope that good sense and taste may yet meet each +other, for both sexes; that men may borrow for their dress some womanly +taste, women some masculine sense; and society may again witness a +graceful and appropriate costume, without being too much absorbed in +"featherses."</p> + +<center> +<hr class="narrow"> +</center> +<h2 align="center"><a name="6"></a><a href="#TOC">VI<br> + STUDY AND WORK</a></h2> + +<blockquote> +<p>"Movet me ingens scientiarum admiratio, seu legis communis aequitas, ut +in nostro sexu, rarum non esse feram, id quod omnium votis dignissimum +est. Nam cum sapientia tantum generis humani ornamentum sit, ut ad omnes +et singulos (quoad quidem per sortem cujusque liceat) extendi jure debeat, +non vidi, cur virgini, in qua excolendi sese ornandique sedulitatem +admittimus, non conveniat mundus hic omnium longè +pulcherrimus."--ANNAE MARIAE À SCHURMAN EPISTOLAE. (1638.)</p> + +<p>"A great reverence for knowledge and the natural sense of justice urge +me to encourage in my own sex that which is most worthy the aspirations of +all. For, since wisdom is so great an ornament of the human race that it +should of right be extended (so far as practicable) to each and every one, +I have not perceived why this fairest of ornaments should not be +appropriate for the maiden, to whom we permit all diligence in the +decoration and adornment of herself."</p> +</blockquote> + +<p> </p> + +<h2><a name="6-1"></a><a href="#TOC">EXPERIMENTS</a></h2> + +<p>Why is it, that, whenever anything is done for women in the way of +education, it is called "an experiment,"--something that is to be long +considered, stoutly opposed, grudgingly yielded, and dubiously watched,-- +while, if the same thing is done for men, its desirableness is assumed as +a matter of course, and the thing is done? Thus, when Harvard College was +founded, it was not regarded as an experiment, but as an institution. The +"General Court," in 1636, "agreed to give 400 <i>l</i>. towards a schoale +or colledge," and the affair was settled. Every subsequent step in the +expanding of educational opportunities for young men has gone in the same +way. But when there seems a chance of extending, however irregularly, some +of the same collegiate advantages to women, I observe that respectable +newspapers, in all good faith, are apt to speak of the measure as an +"experiment."</p> + +<p>It seems to me no more of an "experiment" than when a boy who has +usually eaten up his whole apple becomes a little touched with a sense of +justice, and finally decides to offer his sister the smaller half. If he +has ever regarded that offer as an experiment, the first actual trial will +put the result into the list of certainties; and it will become an axiom +in his mind that girls like apples. Whatever may be said about the +position of women in law and society, it is clear that their educational +disadvantages have been a prolonged disgrace to the other sex, and one for +which women themselves are in no way accountable. When Françoise de +Saintonges, in the sixteenth century, wished to establish girls' schools +in France, she was hooted in the streets, and her father called together +four doctors of law to decide whether she was possessed of a devil in +planning to teach women,--"<i>pour s'assurer qu'instruire des femmes +n'était pas un oeuvre du démon</i>." From that day to this +we have seen women almost always more ready to be taught than was any one +else to teach them. Talk as you please about their wishing or not wishing +to vote: they have certainly wished for instruction, and have had it doled +out to them almost as grudgingly as if it were the ballot itself.</p> + +<p>Consider the educational history of Massachusetts, for instance. The +wife of President John Adams was born in 1744; and she says of her youth +that "female education, in the best families, went no farther than writing +and arithmetic." Barry tells us in his "History of Massachusetts," that +the public education was first provided for boys only; "but light soon +broke in, and girls were allowed to attend the public schools two hours a +day."[1] It appears from President Quincy's "Municipal History of +Boston,"[2] that from 1790 girls were there admitted to such schools, but +during the summer months only, when there were not boys enough to fill +them,--from April 20 to October 20 of each year. This lasted until 1822, +when Boston became a city. Four years after, an attempt was made to +establish a high school for girls, which was not, however, to teach Latin +and Greek. It had, in the words of the school committee of 1854, "an +alarming success;" and the school was abolished after eighteen months' +trial, because the girls crowded into it; and as Mr. Quincy, with +exquisite simplicity, records, "not one voluntarily quitted it, and there +was no reason to suppose that any one admitted to the school would +voluntarily quit for the whole three years, except in case of +marriage!"</p> + +<p>How amusing seems it now to read of such an "experiment" as this, +abandoned only because of its overwhelming success! How absurd now seem +the discussions of a few years ago!--the doubts whether young women really +desired higher education, whether they were capable of it, whether their +health would bear it, whether their parents would permit it. An address I +gave before the Social Science Association on this subject, at Boston, May +14, 1873, now seems to me such a collection of platitudes that I hardly +see how I dared come before an intelligent audience with such needless +reasonings. It is as if I had soberly labored to prove that two and two +make four, or that ginger is "hot i' the mouth." Yet the subsequent +discussion in that meeting showed that around even these harmless and +commonplace propositions the battle of debate could rage hot; and it +really seemed as if even to teach women the alphabet ought still to be +mentioned as "a promising experiment." Now, with the successes before us +of so many colleges; with the spectacle at Cambridge of young women +actually reading Plato "at sight" with Professor Goodwin,--it surely seems +as if the higher education of women might be considered quite beyond the +stage of experiment, and might henceforth be provided for in the same +common-sense and matter-of-course way which we provide for the education +of young men.</p> + +<p>And, if this point is already reached in education, how long before it +will also be reached in political life, and women's voting be viewed as a +matter of course, and a thing no longer experimental?</p> + +<p>[Footnote 1: Vol. iii. 323.]</p> + +<p>[Footnote 2: Page 21.]</p> + +<h2><a name="6-2"></a><a href="#TOC">INTELLECTUAL CINDERELLAS</a></h2> + +<p>When, some thirty years ago, the extraordinary young mathematician, +Truman Henry Safford, first attracted the attention of New England by his +rare powers, I well remember the pains that were taken to place him under +instruction by the ablest Harvard professors: the greater his abilities, +the more needful that he should have careful and symmetrical training. The +men of science did not say, "Stand off! let him alone! let him strive +patiently until he has achieved something positively valuable, and he may +be sure of prompt and generous recognition--when he is fifty years old." +If such a course would have been mistaken and ungenerous if applied to +Professor Safford, why is it not something to be regretted that it was +applied to Mrs. Somerville? In her case, the mischief was done: she was, +happily, strong enough to bear it; but, as the English critics say, we +never shall know what science has lost by it. We can do nothing for her +now; but we could do something for future women like her, by pointing this +obvious moral for their benefit, instead of being content with a mere +tardy recognition of success, after a woman has expended half a century in +struggle.</p> + +<p>It is commonly considered to be a step forward in civilization, that +whereas ancient and barbarous nations exposed children to special +hardships, in order to kill off the weak and toughen the strong, modern +nations aim to rear all alike carefully, without either sacrificing or +enfeebling. If we apply this to muscle, why not to mind? and if to men's +minds, why not to women's? Why use for men's intellects, which are claimed +to be stronger, the forcing process,--offering, for instance, many +thousand dollars a year in gratuities at our colleges, that young men may +be induced to come and learn,--and only withhold assistance from the +weaker minds of women? A little schoolgirl once told me that she did not +object to her teacher's showing partiality, but thought she "ought to show +partiality to all alike." If all our university systems are wrong, and the +proper diet for mathematical genius consists of fifty years' snubbing, let +us employ it, by all means; but let it be applied to both sexes.</p> + +<p>That it is the duty of women, even under disadvantageous circumstances, +to prove their purpose by labor, to "verify their credentials," is true +enough; but this moral is only part of the moral of Mrs. Somerville's +book, and is cruelly incomplete without the other half. What a garden of +roses was Mrs. Somerville's life, according to some comfortable critics! +"All that for which too many women nowadays are content to sit and whine, +or fitfully and carelessly struggle, came naturally and quietly to Mrs. +Somerville. And the reason was that she never asked for anything until she +had earned it; or, rather, she never asked at all, but was content to +earn." Naturally and quietly! You might as well say that Garrison fought +slavery "quietly," or that Frederick Douglass's escape came to him +"naturally." Turn to the book itself, and see with what strong, though +never actually bitter, feeling, the author looks back upon her hard +struggle.</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>"I was intensely ambitious to excel in something; for I felt in my own +breast that women were capable of taking a higher place in creation than +that assigned them in my early days, which was very low" (p. 60). "Nor ... +should I have had courage to ask any of them a question, for I should have +been laughed at. I was often very sad and forlorn; not a hand held out to +help me" (p. 47). "My father came home for a short time, and, somehow or +other finding out what I was about, said to my mother, 'Peg, we must put a +stop to this, or we shall have Mary in a strait-jacket one of these days'" +(p. 54). "I continued my mathematical and other pursuits, but under great +disadvantages; for, although my husband did not prevent me from studying, +I met with no sympathy whatever from him, as he had a very low opinion of +the capacity of my sex, and had neither knowledge of nor interest in +science of any kind" (p. 75). "I was considered eccentric and foolish; and +my conduct was highly disapproved of by many, especially by some members +of my own family" (p. 80). "A man can always command his time under the +plea of business: a woman is not allowed any such excuse" (p. 164). And so +on.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>At last, in 1831,--Mrs. Somerville being then fifty-one,--her work on +"The Mechanism of the Heavens" appeared. Then came universal recognition, +generous if not prompt, a tardy acknowledgment. "Our relations," she says, +"and others who had so severely criticised and ridiculed me, astonished at +my success, were now loud in my praise."[1] No doubt. So were, probably, +Cinderella's sisters loud in her praise, when the prince at last took her +from the chimney-corner, and married her. They had kept for themselves, to +be sure, as long as they could, the delights and opportunities of life; +while she had taken the place assigned her in her early days,--"which was +very low," as Mrs. Somerville says. But, for all that, they were very kind +to her in the days of her prosperity; and no doubt packed their little +trunks and came to visit their dear sister at the palace as often as she +could wish. And, doubtless, the Fairyland Monthly of that day, when it +came to review Cinderella's "Personal Recollections," pointed out that, as +soon as that distinguished lady had "achieved something positively +valuable," she received "prompt and generous recognition."</p> + +<p>[Footnote 1: Page 176.]</p> + +<h2><a name="6-3"></a><a href="#TOC">CUPID-AND-PSYCHOLOGY</a></h2> + +<p>The learned Master of Trinity College, Cambridge, England, is +frequently facetious; and his jokes are quoted with the deference due to +the chief officer of the chief college of that great university. Now it is +known that the Cambridge colleges, and Trinity College in particular, are +doing a great deal for the instruction of women. The young women of Girton +College and Newnham College--both of these being institutions for their +benefit, in or near Cambridge--not only enjoy the instruction of the +university, but they share it under a guaranty that it shall be of the +best quality; because they attend, in many cases, the very same lectures +with the young men. Where this is not done, they sometimes use the vacant +lecture-rooms of the college; and it was in connection with an application +for this privilege that the Master of Trinity College made a celebrated +joke. When told that the lecture-room was needed for a class of young +women in psychology, he said, "Psychology? What kind of psychology? +Cupid-and-Psychology, I suppose."</p> + +<p>Cupid-and-Psychology is, after all, not so bad a department of +instruction. It may be taken as a good enough symbol of that mingling of +head and heart which is the best result of all training. One of the worst +evils of the separate education of the sexes has been the easy assumption +that men were to become all head, and women all heart. It was to correct +the evils of this that Ben Jonson proposed for his ideal woman</p> + +<p>"a learned and a manly soul."</p> + +<p>It was an implied recognition of it from the other side when the great +masculine intellect, Goethe, held up as a guiding force in his Faust "the +eternal womanly" (<i>das ewige weibliche</i>). After all, each sex must +teach the other, and impart to the other. It will never do to have all the +brains poured into one human being, and christened "man;" and all the +affections decanted into another, and labelled "woman." Nature herself +rejects this theory. Darwin himself, the interpreter of nature, shows that +there is a perpetual effort going on, by unseen forces, to equalize the +sexes, since sons often inherit from the mother, and daughters from the +father. And we all take pleasure in discovering in the noblest of each sex +something of the qualities of the other,--the tender affections in great +men, the imperial intellect in great women.</p> + +<p>On the whole, there is no harm, but rather good, in the new science of +Cupid-and-Psychology. There are combinations for which no single word can +suffice. The phrase belongs to the same class with Lowell's witty +denunciation of a certain tiresome letter-writer, as being, not his +incubus, but his "pen-and-inkubus." It is as well to admit it first as +last: Cupid-and-Psychology will be taught wherever young men and women +study together. Not in the direct and simple form of mutual love-making, +perhaps; for they tell the visitor, at universities which admit both +sexes, that the young men and maidens do not fall in love with each other, +but are apt to seek their mates elsewhere. The new science has a wider +bearing, and suggests that the brain is incomplete, after all, without the +affections; and so are the affections without the brain. A certain +professorship at Harvard University which the Rev. Dr. Francis G.</p> + +<p>Peabody now fills, and which Phillips Brooks was once invited to fill, +was founded by a woman, Miss Plummer; and the name proposed by her for it +was "a professorship of the heart," though they after all called it only a +professorship of "Christian morals." We need the heart in our colleges, it +seems, even if we only get it under the ingenious title of +Cupid-and-Psychology.</p> + +<h2><a name="6-4"></a><a href="#TOC">SELF-SUPPORTING WIVES</a></h2> + +<p>For one, I have never been fascinated by the style of domestic paradise +that English novels depict,--half a dozen unmarried daughters round the +family hearth, all assiduously doing worsted-work and petting their papa. +I believe a sufficiency of employment to be the only normal and healthy +condition for a human being; and where there is not work enough to employ +the full energies of all at home, it seems as proper for young women as +for young birds to leave the parental nest. If this additional work is +done for money, very well. It is the conscious dignity of self-support +that removes the traditional curse from labor, and woman has a right to +claim her share in that dignified position.</p> + +<p>Yet I cannot agree, on the other hand, with those who maintain that the +true woman should be self-supporting, even in marriage. Woman's part of +the family task--the care of home and children--is just as essential to +building up the family fortunes as the very different toil of the out-door +partner. For young married women to undertake any more direct aid to the +family income is in most cases utterly undesirable, and is asking of +themselves a great deal too much. And this is not because they are to be +encouraged in indolence, but because they already, in a normal condition +of things, have their hands full. As, on this point, I may differ from +some of my readers, let me explain precisely what I mean.</p> + +<p>As I write, there are at work, in another part of the house, two +paper-hangers, a man and his wife, each forty-five or fifty years of age. +Their children are grown up, and some of them married: they have a +daughter at home, who is old enough to do the housework, and leave the +mother free. There is no way of organizing the labors of this household +better than this: the married pair toil together during the day, and go +home together to their evening rest. A happier couple I never saw; it is a +delight to see them cheerily at work together, cutting, pasting, hanging: +their life seems like a prolonged industrial picnic; and if I had the +ill-luck to own as many palaces as an English duke I should keep them +permanently occupied in putting fresh papers on the walls.</p> + +<p>But the merit of this employment for the woman is that it interferes +with no other duty. Were she a young mother with little children, and +obliged by her paper-hanging to neglect them, or to leave them at a +"day-nursery," or to overwork herself by combining too many cares, then +the sight of her would be very sad. So sacred a thing is motherhood, so +paramount and absorbing the duty of a mother to her child, that in a true +state of society I think she should be utterly free from all other +duties,--even, if possible, from the ordinary cares of housekeeping. If +she has spare health and strength to do these other things as pleasures, +very well; but she should be relieved from them as duties. And as to the +need of self-support, I can hardly conceive of an instance where it can be +to the mother of young children anything but a disaster. As we all know, +this calamity often occurs; I have seen it among the factory operatives at +the North, and among the negro women in the cotton-fields at the South: in +both cases it is a tragedy, and the bodies and brains of mother and +children alike suffer. That the mother should bear and tend and nurture, +while the father supports and protects,--this is the true division.</p> + +<p>Does this bear in any way upon suffrage? Not at all. The mother can +inform herself upon public questions in the intervals of her cares, as the +father among his; and the baby in the cradle is a perpetual appeal to her, +as to him, that the institutions under which that baby dwells may be kept +pure. One of the most devoted young mothers I ever knew--the younger +sister of Margaret Fuller Ossoli--made it a rule, no matter how much her +children absorbed her, to read books or newspapers for an hour every day; +in order, she said, that she should be more to them than a mere source of +physical nurture, and that her mind should be kept fresh and alive for +them. But to demand in addition that such a mother should earn money for +them is to ask too much; and there is many a tombstone in New England, +which, if it told the truth, would tell what comes of such an effort.</p> + +<h2><a name="6-5"></a><a href="#TOC">THOROUGH</a></h2> + +<p>"The hopeless defect of women in all practical matters," said a shrewd +merchant the other day, "is that it is impossible to make them thorough." +It was a shallow remark, and so I told him. Women are thorough in the +things which they have been expected to regard as their sphere,--in their +housekeeping and their dress and their social observances. There is +nothing more thorough on earth than the way housework is done in a genuine +New England household. There is an exquisite thoroughness in the way a +milliner's or a dressmaker's work is done,--a work such as clumsy man +cannot rival, and can hardly estimate. No general plans his campaigns or +marshals his armies better than some women of society--the late Mrs. Paran +Stevens, for instance--manage the circles of which they are the centre. +Day and night, winter and summer, at city or watering-place, year in and +year out, such a woman keeps open house for her gay world. She has a +perpetual series of guests who must be fed luxuriously, and amused +profusely; she talks to them in three or four languages; at her +entertainments she notes who is present and who absent, as carefully as +Napoleon watched his soldiers; her interchange of cards, alone, is a thing +as complex as the army muster-rolls: thus she plans, organizes, conquers, +and governs. People speak of her existence as that of a doll or a toy, +when she is the most untiring of campaigners. Grant that her aim is, after +all, unworthy, and that you pity the worn face which has to force so many +smiles. No matter: the smiles are there, and so is the success. I often +wish that the reformers would do their work as thoroughly as the women of +society do theirs.</p> + +<p>No, there is no constitutional want of thoroughness in women. The +trouble is that into the new work upon which they are just entering they +have not yet brought their thoroughness to bear. They suffer and are +defrauded and are reproached, simply because they have not yet nerved +themselves to do well the things which they have asserted their right to +do. A distinguished woman, who earns one of the largest incomes ever +honestly earned by any one of her sex, off the stage, told me the other +day that she left all her business affairs to the management of others, +and did not even know how to draw a check on a bank. What a melancholy +self-exhibition was that of a clever American woman, whom I knew, the +author of half a dozen successful books, refusing to look her own accounts +in the face until they had got into such a tangle that not even her own +referees could disentangle them to suit her! These things show, not that +women are constitutionally wanting in thoroughness, but that it is hard to +make them carry this quality into new fields.</p> + +<p>I wish I could possibly convey to the young women who write for advice +on literary projects something of the meaning of this word "thorough" as +applied to literary work. Scarcely any of them seem to have a conception +of it. Dash, cleverness, recklessness, impatience of revision or of +patient investigation, these are the common traits. To a person of +experience, no stupidity is so discouraging as a brilliancy that has no +roots. It brings nothing to pass; whereas a slow stupidity, if it takes +time enough, may conquer the world. Consider that for more than twenty +years the path of literature has been quite as fully open for women as for +men, in America,-- the payment the same, the honor the same, the obstacles +no greater. Collegiate education has until quite recently been denied +them, but how many men succeed as writers without that advantage! Yet how +little, how very little, of permanent literary work has yet been done by +American women! Young girls appear one after another: each writes a single +clever story or a single sweet poem, and then disappears forever. Look at +Griswold's "Female Poets of America," and you are disposed to turn back to +the title-page, and see if these utterly forgotten names do not really +represent the "female poets" of some other nation. They are forgotten, as +most of the more numerous "female prose writers" are forgotten, because +they had no root. Nobody doubts that women have cleverness enough, and +enough of power of expression. If you could open the mails, and take out +the women's letters, as somebody says, they would prove far more graphic +and entertaining than those of the men. They would be written, too, in +what Macaulay calls--speaking of Madame d'Arblay's early style--"true +woman's English, clear, natural, and lively." What they need, in order to +convert this epistolary brilliancy into literature, is to be thorough.</p> + +<p>You cannot separate woman's rights and her responsibilities. In all +ages of the world she has had a certain limited work to do, and has done +that well. All that is needed, when new spheres are open, is that she +should carry the same fidelity into those. If she will work as hard to +shape the children of her brain as to rear her bodily offspring, will do +intellectual work as well as she does housework, and will meet her moral +responsibilities as she meets her social engagements, then opposition will +soon disappear. The habit of thoroughness is the key to all high success. +Whatever is worth doing is worth doing well. Only those who are faithful +in a few things will rightfully be made rulers over many.</p> + +<h2><a name="6-6"></a><a href="#TOC">LITERARY ASPIRANTS</a></h2> + +<p>The brilliant Lady Ashburton used to say of herself that she had never +written a book, and knew nobody whose books she would like to have +written. This does not seem to be the ordinary state of mind among those +who write letters of inquiry to authors. If I may judge from these +letters, the yearning for a literary career is now almost greater among +women than among men. Perhaps this is because of some literary successes +lately achieved by women. Perhaps it is because they have fewer outlets +for their energies. Perhaps they find more obstacles in literature than +young men find, and have, therefore, more need to write letters of inquiry +about it. It is certain that they write such letters quite often; and ask +questions that test severely the supposed omniscience of the author's +brain,--questions bearing on logic, rhetoric, grammar, and orthography; +where to find a publisher, and how to obtain a well-disciplined mind.</p> + +<p>These letters may sometimes be too long or come too often for +convenience, nor is the consoling postage-stamp always remembered. But +they are of great value as giving real glimpses of American social life, +and of the present tendencies of American women. They sometimes reveal +such intellectual ardor and imagination, such modesty, and such patience +under difficulties, as to do good to the reader, whatever they may do to +the writer. They certainly suggest a few thoughts, which may as well be +expressed, once for all, in print.</p> + +<p>Behind almost all these letters there lies a laudable desire to achieve +success. "Would you have the goodness to tell us how success can be +obtained?" How can this be answered, my dear young lady, when you leave it +to the reader to guess what your definition of success may be? For +instance, here is Mr. Mansfield Tracy Walworth, who was murdered the other +day in New York. He was at once mentioned in the newspapers as a +"celebrated author."</p> + +<p>Never in my life having heard of him, I looked in a "Manual of American +Literature," and there found that Mr. Walworth's novel of "Warwick" had a +sale of seventy-five thousand copies, and his "Delaplaine" of forty-five +thousand. Is it a success to have secured a sale like that for your books, +and then to die, and have your brother penmen ask, "Who was he?" Yet, +certainly, a sale of seventy-five thousand copies is not to be despised; +and I fear I know many youths and maidens who would willingly write novels +much poorer than "Warwick" for the sake of a circulation like that. I do +not think that Hawthorne, however, would have accepted these conditions; +and he certainly did not have this style of success.</p> + +<p>Nor do I think he had any right to expect it. He had made his choice, +and had reason to be satisfied. The very first essential for literary +success is to decide what success means. If a young girl pines after the +success of Marion Harland and Mrs. Southworth, let her seek it. It is +possible that she may obtain it, or surpass it; and though she might do +better, she might do far worse. It is, at any rate, a laudable aim to be +popular: popularity may be a very creditable thing, unless you pay too +high a price for it. It is a pleasant thing, and has many contingent +advantages,--balanced by this great danger, that one is apt to mistake it +for real success.</p> + +<p>"Learning hath made the most," said old Fuller, "by those books on +which the booksellers have lost." If this be true of learning, it is quite +as true of genius and originality. A book may be immediately popular and +also immortal, but the chances are the other way. It is more often the +case that a great writer gradually creates the taste by which he is +enjoyed. Wordsworth in England and Emerson in America were striking +instances of this; and authors of far less fame have yet the same choice +which they had. You can take the standard which the book market offers, +and train yourself for that. This will, in the present age, be sure to +educate certain qualities in you,--directness, vividness, animation, +dash,--even if it leaves other qualities untrained. Or you can make a +standard of your own, and aim at that, taking your chance of seeing the +public agree with you. Very likely you may fail; perhaps you may be wrong +in your fancy, after all, and the public may be right: if you fail, you +may find it hard to bear; but, on the other hand, you may have the inward +"glory and joy" which nothing but fidelity to an ideal standard can give. +All this applies to all forms of work, but it applies conspicuously to +literature.</p> + +<p>Instead, therefore, of offering to young writers the usual comforting +assurance, that, if they produce anything of real merit, it will be sure +to succeed, I should caution them first to make their own definition of +success, and then act accordingly. Hawthorne succeeded in his way, and Mr. +M.T. Walworth in his way; and each of these would have been very +unreasonable if he had expected to succeed in both ways. There is always +an opening for careful and conscientious literary work; and by such work +many persons obtain a modest support. There are also some great prizes to +be won; but these are commonly, though not always, won by work of a more +temporary and sensational kind. Make your choice; and, when you have got +precisely what you asked for, do not complain because you have missed what +you would not take.</p> + +<h2><a name="6-7"></a><a href="#TOC">THE CAREER OF LETTERS</a></h2> + +<p>A young girl of some talent once told me that she had devoted herself +to "the career of letters." I found, on inquiry, that she had obtained a +situation as writer of society gossip for a New York newspaper. I can +hardly imagine any life that leads more directly away from any really +literary career, or any life about which it is harder to give counsel. The +work of a newspaper correspondent, especially in the "society" direction, +is so full of trials and temptations, for one of either sex, in our dear, +inquisitive, gossiping America, that one cannot help watching with +especial solicitude all women who enter it. Their special gifts as women +are a source of danger: they are keener of observation from the very fact +of their sex, more active in curiosity, more skilful in achieving their +ends; in a world of gossip they are the queens, and men but their +subjects, hence their greater danger.</p> + +<p>In Newport, New York, Washington, it is the same thing. The unbounded +appetite for private information about public or semi-public people +creates its own purveyors; and these, again, learn to believe with +unflinching heartiness in the work they do. I have rarely encountered a +successful correspondent of this description who had not become thoroughly +convinced that the highest desire of every human being is to see his name +in print, no matter how. Unhappily, there is a great deal to encourage +this belief: I have known men to express great indignation at an +unexpected newspaper-puff, and then to send ten dollars privately to the +author. This is just the calamity of the profession, that it brings one in +contact with this class of social hypocrites; and the "personal" +correspondent gradually loses faith that there is any other class to be +found. Then there is the perilous temptation to pay off grudges in this +way, to revenge slights, by the use of a power with which few people are +safely to be trusted. In many cases, such a correspondent is simply a +child playing with poisoned arrows: he poisons others; and it is no +satisfaction to know that in time he may also poison himself, and paralyze +his own power for mischief.</p> + +<p>There lies before me a letter written some years ago to a young lady +anxious to enter on this particular "career of letters,"--a letter from an +experienced New York journalist. He has employed, he says, hundreds of +lady correspondents, for little or no compensation; and one of his few +successful writers he thus describes: "She succeeds by pushing her way +into society, and extracting information from fashionable people and +officials and their wives.... She flatters the vain, and overawes the +weak, and gets by sheer impudence what other writers cannot.... I would +not wish you to be like her, or reduced to the necessity of doing what she +does, for any success journalism can possibly give." And who can help +echoing this opinion? If this is one of the successful laborers, where +shall we place the unsuccessful; or, rather, is success, or failure, the +greater honor?</p> + +<p>Personal journalism has a prominence in this country with which nothing +in any other country can be compared. What is called publicity in England +or France means the most peaceful seclusion, compared with the glare of +notoriety which an enterprising correspondent can flash out at any +time--as if by opening the bull's-eye of a dark lantern--upon the quietest +of his contemporaries. It is essentially an American institution, and not +one of those in which we have reason to feel most pride. It is to be +observed, however, that foreigners, if in office, take to it very readily; +and it is said that no people cultivate the reporters at Washington more +assiduously than the diplomatic corps, who like to send home the personal +notices of themselves, in order to prove to their governments that they +are highly esteemed in the land to which they are appointed. But however +it may be with them, it is certain that many people still like to keep +their public and private lives apart, and shrink from even the inevitable +eminence of fame. One of the very most popular of American authors has +said that he never, to this day, has overcome a slight feeling of +repugnance on seeing his own name in print.</p> + +<h2><a name="6-8"></a><a href="#TOC">TALKING AND TAKING</a></h2> + +<p>Every time a woman does anything original or remarkable,--inventing a +rat-trap, let us say, or carving thirty-six heads on a walnut-shell,--all +observers shout applause. "There's a woman for you, indeed! Instead of +talking about her rights, she takes them. That's the way to do it. What a +lesson to these declaimers upon the platform!"</p> + +<p>It does not seem to occur to these wise people that the right to talk +is itself one of the chief rights in America, and the way to reach all the +others. To talk is to make a beginning, at any rate. To catch people with +your ideas is more than to contrive a rat-trap; and Isotta Nogarola, +carving thirty-six empty heads, was not working in so practical a fashion +as Mary Livermore when she instructs thirty-six hundred full ones.</p> + +<p>It shows the good sense of the woman-suffrage agitators, that they have +decided to begin with talk. In the first place, talking is the most +lucrative of all professions in America; and therefore it is the duty of +American women to secure their share of it. Mrs. Frances Anne Kemble used +to say that she read Shakespeare in public "for her bread;" and when, +after melting all hearts by a course of farewell readings, she decided to +begin reading again, she said she was doing it "for her butter." So long +as women are often obliged to support themselves and their children, and +perhaps their husbands, by their own labor, they have no right to work +cheaply, unless driven to it. Anna Dickinson had no right to make fifteen +dollars a week by sewing, if, by stepping out of the ranks of needle-women +into the ranks of the talkers, she could make a hundred dollars a day. +Theorize as we may, the fact is that there is no kind of work in America +which brings such sure profits as public speaking. If women are unfitted +for it, or if they "know the value of peace and quietness," as the +hand-organ man says, and can afford to hold their tongues, let them do so. +But if they have tongues, and like to use them, they certainly ought to +make some money by the performance.</p> + +<p>This is the utilitarian view. And when we bring in higher objects, it +is plain that the way to get anything in America is to talk about it. +Silence is golden, no doubt, and like other gold remains in the +bank-vaults, and does not just now circulate very freely as currency. Even +literature in America is utterly second to oratory as a means of immediate +influence. Of all sway, that of the orator is the most potent and most +perishable; and the student and the artist are apt to hold themselves +aloof from it, for this reason. But it is the one means in America to +accomplish immediate results, and women who would take their rights must +take them through talking. It is the appointed way.</p> + +<p>Under a good old-fashioned monarchy, if a woman wished to secure +anything for her sex, she must cajole a court, or become the mistress of a +monarch.</p> + +<p>That epoch ended with the French Revolution. When Bonaparte wished to +silence Madame de Staël, he said, "What does that woman want? Does +she want the money the government owes to her father?" When Madame de +Staël heard of it, she said, "The question is not what I want, but +what I think." Henceforth women, like men, are to say what they think. For +all that flattery and seduction and sin, we have substituted the simple +weapon of talk. If women wish education, they must talk; if better laws, +they must talk. The one chief argument against woman suffrage, with men, +is that so few women even talk about it.</p> + +<p>As long as the human voice can effect anything, it is the duty of women +to use it; and in America, where it effects everything, they should talk +all the time. When they have obtained, as a class, absolute equality of +rights with men, their appeals on this subject may cease, and they may +accept, if they please, that naughty masculine definition of a happy +marriage,--the union of a deaf man with a dumb woman.</p> + +<h2><a name="6-9"></a><a href="#TOC">HOW TO SPEAK IN PUBLIC</a></h2> + +<p>There are other things that women wish to do, it seems, beside studying +and voting. There are a good many--if I may judge from letters that +occasionally come to me--who are taking, or wish to take, their first +lessons in public speaking. Not necessarily very much in public, or before +mixed audiences, but perhaps merely to say to a roomful of ladies, or +before the committee of a Christian Union, what they desire to say. "How +shall I make myself heard? How shall I learn to express myself? How shall +I keep my head clear? Is there any school for debate?" And so on. My dear +young lady, it does not take much wisdom, but only a little experience, to +answer some of these questions. So I am not afraid to try.</p> + +<p>The best school for debate is debating. So far as mere confidence and +comfort are concerned, the great thing is to gain the habit of speech, +even if one speaks badly. And the practice of an ordinary debating society +has also this advantage, that it teaches you to talk sense (lest you be +laughed at), to speak with some animation (lest your hearers go to sleep), +to think out some good arguments (because you are trying to convince +somebody), and to guard against weak reasoning or unfounded assertion +(lest your opponent trip you up). Speaking in a debating society thus +gives you the same advantage that a lawyer derives from the presence of an +opposing counsel: you learn to guard yourself at all points. It is the +absence of this check which is the great intellectual disadvantage of the +pulpit When a lawyer says a foolish thing in an argument, he is pretty +sure to find it out; but a clergyman may go on repeating his foolish thing +for fifty years without discovering it, for want of an opponent.</p> + +<p>For the art of making your voice heard, I must refer you to an +elocutionist. Yet one thing at least you might acquire for yourself,--a +thing that lies at the foundation of all good speaking,--the complete and +thorough enunciation of every syllable. So great is the delight, to my ear +at least, of a perfectly distinct and clear-cut utterance, that I fear I +should rather listen for an hour to the merest nonsense, so uttered, than +to the very wisdom of angels if given in a confused or nasal or slovenly +way. If you wish to know what I mean by a clear and satisfactory +utterance, go to a woman-suffrage convention, and hear Miss Mary F. +Eastman.</p> + +<p>As to your employment of language, the great aim is to be simple, and, +in a measure, conversational; and then let eloquence come of itself. If +most people talked as well in public as in private, public meetings would +be more interesting. To acquire a conversational tone, there is good sense +in Edward Everett Hale's suggestion, that every person who is called on to +speak,--let us say, at a public dinner,--instead of standing up and +talking about his surprise at being called on, should simply make his last +remark to his neighbor at the table the starting-point for what he says to +the whole company. He will thus make sure of a perfectly natural key, to +begin with; and can go on from this quiet "As I was just saying to Mr. +Smith," to discuss the gravest question of Church or State. It breaks the +ice for him, like the remark upon the weather by which we open our +interview with the person whom we have longed for years to meet. Beginning +in this way at the level of the earth's surface, we can join hands and +rise to the clouds. Begin in the clouds,--as some of my most esteemed +friends are wont to do,-- and you have to sit down before reaching the +earth.</p> + +<p>And, to come last to what is first in importance, I am taking it for +granted that you have something to say, and a strong desire to say it. +Perhaps you can say it better for writing it out in full beforehand. But +whether you do this or not, remember that the more simple and consecutive +your thought, the easier it will be both to keep it in mind and to utter +it. The more orderly your plan, the less likely you will be to "get +bewildered," or to "lose the thread." Think it out so clearly that the +successive parts lead to one another, and then there will be little strain +upon your memory. For each point you make, provide at least one good +argument and one good illustration, and you can, after a little practice, +safely leave the rest to the suggestion of the moment. But so much as this +you must have, to be secure. Methods of preparation of course vary +extremely; yet I suppose the secret of the composure of an experienced +speaker to lie usually in this, that he has made sure beforehand of a +sufficient number of good points to carry him through, even if nothing +good should occur to him on the spot. Thus wise people, in going on a +fishing excursion, take with them not merely their fishing tackle, but a +few fish; and then, if they are not sure of their luck, they will be sure +of their chowder.</p> + +<p>These are some of the simple hints that might be given, in answer to +inquiring friends. I can remember when they would have saved me some +anguish of spirit; and they may be of some use to others now. I write, +then, not to induce any one to talk for the sake of talking,--Heaven +forbid!--but that those who are longing to say something should not fancy +the obstacles insurmountable, when they are really slight.</p> + +<center> +<hr class="narrow"> +</center> +<h2 align="center"><a name="7"></a><a href="#TOC">VII<br> + PRINCIPLES OF GOVERNMENT</a></h2> + +<blockquote> +<p>"That liberty, or freedom, consists in having an actual share in the +appointment of those who frame the laws, and who are to be the guardians +of every man's life, property, and peace; for the all of one man is as +dear to him as the all of another, and the poor man has an equal right, +but more need, to have representatives in the legislature than the rich +one. That they who have no voice nor vote in the electing of +representatives do not enjoy liberty, but are absolutely enslaved to those +who have votes, and to their representatives; for to be enslaved is to +have governors whom other men have set over us, and be subject to laws +made by the representatives of others, without having had representatives +of our own to give consent in our behalf."--BENJAMIN FRANKLIN, in Sparks's +Franklin, ii. 372.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p> </p> + +<h2><a name="7-1"></a><a href="#TOC">WE THE PEOPLE</a></h2> + +<p>I remember that when I went to school I used to look with wonder on the +title of a now forgotten newspaper of those days which was then often in +the hands of one of the older scholars. I remember nothing else about the +newspaper, or about the boy, except that the title of the sheet he used to +unfold was "We the People;" and that he derived from it his school +nickname, by a characteristic boyish parody, and was usually mentioned as +"Us the Folks."</p> + +<p>Probably all that was taught in that school, in regard to American +history, was not of so much value as the permanent fixing of this phrase +in our memories. It seemed very natural, in later years, to come upon my +old friend "Us the Folks," reproduced in almost every charter of our +national government, as thus:--</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>"WE THE PEOPLE of the United States, in order to form a more perfect +union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquillity, provide for the +common defence, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of +liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this +Constitution for the United States of America."--<i>United States +Constitution, Preamble</i>.</p> + +<p>"WE THE PEOPLE of Maine do agree," etc.--<i>Constitution of +Maine</i>.</p> + +<p>"All government of right originates from THE PEOPLE, is founded in +their consent, and instituted for the general good."--<i>Constitution of +New Hampshire</i>.</p> + +<p>"The body politic is formed by a voluntary association of individuals; +it is a social compact, 'by which THE WHOLE PEOPLE covenants with each +citizen, and each citizen with the whole people, that all shall be +governed by certain laws for the common good."--<i>Constitution of +Massachusetts</i>.</p> + +<p>"WE THE PEOPLE of the State of Rhode Island and Providence Plantations +... do ordain and establish this constitution of +government."--<i>Constitution of Rhode Island</i>.</p> + +<p>"The people of Connecticut do, in order more effectually to define, +secure, and perpetuate the liberties, rights, and privileges which they +have derived from their ancestors, hereby ordain and establish the +following constitution and form of civil government."--<i>Constitution of +Connecticut</i>.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>And so on through the constitutions of almost every State in the Union. +Our government is, as Lincoln said, "a government of the people, by the +people, and for the people." There is no escaping it. To question this is +to deny the foundations of the American government. Granted that those who +framed these provisions may not have understood the full extent of the +principles they announced. No matter: they gave us those principles; and, +having them, we must apply them.</p> + +<p>Now, women may be voters or not, citizens or not; but that they are a +part of the people, no one has denied in Christendom--however it may be in +Japan, where, as Mrs. Leonowens tells us, the census of population takes +in only men, and the women and children are left to be inferred. "WE THE +PEOPLE," then, includes women. Be the superstructure what it may, the +foundation of the government clearly provides a place for them: it is +impossible to state the national theory in such a way that it shall not +include them. It is impossible to deny the natural right of women to vote, +except on grounds which exclude all natural right.</p> + +<p>The fundamental charters are on our side. There are certain statute +limitations which may prove greater or less. But these are temporary and +trivial things, always to be interpreted, often to be modified, by +reference to the principles of the Constitution. For instance, when a +constitutional convention is to be held, or new conditions of suffrage to +be created, the whole people should vote upon the matter, including those +not hitherto enfranchised. This is the view insisted on, many years since, +by that eminent jurist, William Beach Lawrence. He maintained, in a letter +to Charles Sumner and in opposition to his own party, that if the question +of "negro suffrage" in the Southern States of the Union were put to vote, +the colored people themselves had a natural right to vote on the question. +The same is true of women. It should never be forgotten by advocates of +woman suffrage, that the deeper their reasonings go, the stronger +foundation they find; and that we have always a solid fulcrum for our +lever in that phrase of our charters, "We the people."</p> + +<h2><a name="7-2"></a><a href="#TOC">THE USE OF THE DECLARATION OF +INDEPENDENCE</a></h2> + +<p>When young people begin to study geometry, they expect to begin with +hard reasoning on the very first page. To their surprise, they find that +the early pages are not occupied by reasoning, but by a few simple, easy, +and rather commonplace sentences, called "axioms," which are really a set +of pegs on which all the reasoning is hung. Pupils are not expected to go +back in every demonstration and prove the axioms. If Almira Jones happens +to be doing a problem at the blackboard on examination day, at the high +school, and remarks in the course of her demonstration that "things which +are equal to the same thing are equal to one another," and if a sharp +questioner jumps up, and says, "How do you know it?" she simply lays down +her bit of chalk, and says fearlessly, "That is an axiom," and the teacher +sustains her. Some things must be taken for granted.</p> + +<p>The same service rendered by axioms in the geometry is supplied in +America, as to government, by the simple principles of the Declaration of +Independence. Right or wrong, they are taken for granted. Inasmuch as all +the legislation of the country is supposed to be based in them,--they +stating the theory of our government, while the Constitution itself only +puts into organic shape the application,--we must all begin with them. It +is a great advantage, and saves great trouble in all reforms. To the +Abolitionists, for instance, what an inestimable labor-saving machine was +the Declaration of Independence! Let them have that, and they asked no +more. Even the brilliant lawyer Rufus Choate, when confronted with its +plain provisions, could only sneer at them as "glittering generalities," +which was equivalent to throwing down his brief, and throwing up his case. +It was an admission that, if you were so foolish as to insist on applying +the first principles of the government, it was all over with him.</p> + +<p>Now, the whole doctrine of woman suffrage follows so directly from +these same political axioms, that they are especially convenient for women +to have in the house. When the Declaration of Independence enumerates as +among "self-evident" truths the fact of governments "deriving their just +powers from the consent of the governed," then that point may be +considered as settled. In this school-examination of maturer life, in this +grown-up geometry class, the student is not to be called upon by the +committee to prove that. She may rightfully lay down her demonstrating +chalk, and say, "That is an axiom. You admit that yourselves."</p> + +<p>It is a great convenience. We cannot always be going back, like a +Hindoo history, to the foundations of the world. Some things may be taken +for granted. How this simple axiom sweeps away, for instance, the cobweb +speculations as to whether voting is a natural right, or a privilege +delegated by society! No matter which. Take it which way you please. That +is an abstract question; but the practical question is a very simple one. +"Governments owe their just powers to the consent of the governed." Either +that axiom is false, or, whenever women as a class refuse their consent to +the present exclusively masculine government, it can no longer claim just +powers. The remedy then may be rightly demanded, which the Declaration of +Independence goes on to state: "Whenever any form of government becomes +destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to +abolish it, and to institute a new government, laying its foundation on +such principles, and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall +seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness."</p> + +<p>This is the use of the Declaration of Independence. Women, as a class, +may not be quite ready to use it. It is the business of this book to help +make them ready. But so far as they are ready these plain provisions are +the axioms of their political faith. If the axioms mean anything for men, +they mean something for women. If men deride the axioms, it is a +concession, like that of Rufus Choate, that these fundamental principles +are very much in their way. But so long as the sentences stand in that +document they can be made useful. If men try to get away from the +arguments of women by saving, "But suppose we have nothing in our theory +of government which requires us to grant your demand?" then women can +answer, as the straightforward Traddles answered Uriah Heep, "But you +have, you know: therefore, if you please, we won't suppose any such +thing."</p> + +<h2><a name="7-3"></a><a href="#TOC">SOME OLD-FASHIONED +PRINCIPLES</a></h2> + +<p>There has been an effort, lately, to show that when our fathers said, +"Taxation without representation is tyranny," they referred not to +personal liberties, but to the freedom of a state from foreign power. It +is fortunate that this criticism has been made, for it has led to a more +careful examination of passages; and this has made it clear, beyond +dispute, that the Revolutionary patriots carried their statements more +into detail than is generally supposed, and affirmed their principles for +individuals, not merely for the state as a whole.</p> + +<p>In that celebrated pamphlet by James Otis, for instance, published as +early as 1764, "The Rights of the Colonies Vindicated," he thus clearly +lays down the rights of the individual as to taxation:--</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>"The very act of taxing, exercised over those who are not represented, +appears to me to be depriving them of one of their most essential rights +as freemen; and, if continued, seems to be, in effect, an entire +disfranchisement of every civil right. For what one civil right is worth a +rush, after a man's property is subject to be taken from him at pleasure, +without his consent? If a man is not his own assessor, in person or by +deputy, his liberty is gone, or he is entirely at the mercy of others." +[1]</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>This fine statement has already done duty for liberty, in another +contest; for it was quoted by Mr. Sumner in his speech of March 7, 1866, +with this commentary:--</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>"Stronger words for universal suffrage could not be employed. His +argument is that if men are taxed without being represented, they are +deprived of essential rights; and the continuance of this deprivation +despoils them of every civil right, thus making the latter depend upon the +right of suffrage, which by a neologism of our day is known as a political +right instead of a civil right. Then, to give point to this argument, the +patriot insists that in determining taxation, 'every man must be his own +assessor, in person or by deputy,' without which his liberty is entirely +at the mercy of others. Here, again, in a different form, is the original +thunderbolt, 'Taxation without representation is tyranny;' and the claim +is made not merely for communities, but for 'every man.'"</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>In a similar way wrote Benjamin Franklin, some six years after, in that +remarkable sheet found among his papers, and called "Declaration of those +Rights of the Commonalty of Great Britain, without which they cannot be +free." The leading propositions were these three:--</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>"That every man of the commonalty (excepting infants, insane persons, +and criminals) is of common right and by the laws of God a freeman, and +entitled to the free enjoyment of liberty. That liberty, or freedom, +consists in having an actual share in the appointment of those who frame +the laws, and who are to be the guardians of every man's life, property, +and peace; for the all of one man is as dear to him as the all of another; +and the poor man has an equal right, but more need, to have +representatives in the legislature than the rich one. That they who have +no voice nor vote in the electing of representatives do not enjoy liberty, +but are absolutely enslaved to those who have votes, and to their +representatives; for to be enslaved is to have governors whom other men +have set over us, and be subject to laws made by the representatives of +others, without having had representatives of our own to give consent in +our behalf."[2]</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>In quoting these words of Dr. Franklin, one of his biographers feels +moved to add, "These principles, so familiar to us now and so obviously +just, were startling and incredible novelties in 1770, abhorrent to nearly +all Englishmen, and to great numbers of Americans." Their fair application +is still abhorrent to a great many; or else, not willing quite to deny the +theory, they limit the application by some such device as "virtual +representation." Here, again, James Otis is ready for them; and Charles +Sumner is ready to quote Otis, as thus:--</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>"No such phrase as virtual representation was ever known in law or +constitution. It is altogether a subtlety and illusion, wholly unfounded +and absurd. We must not be cheated by any such phantom, or any other +fiction of law or politics, or any monkish trick of deceit or +blasphemy."</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>These are the sharp words used by the patriot Otis, speaking of those +who were trying to convince American citizens that they were virtually +represented in Parliament Sumner applied the same principle to the +freedmen: it is now applied to women. "Taxation without representation is +tyranny." "Virtual representation is altogether a subtlety and illusion, +wholly unfounded and absurd." No ingenuity, no evasion, can give any +escape from these plain principles. Either you must revoke the maxims of +the American Revolution, or you must enfranchise woman. Stuart Mill well +says in his autobiography, "The interest of woman is included in that of +man exactly as much (and no more) as that of subjects in that of +kings."</p> + +<p>[Footnote 1: Otis, <i>Rights of the Colonies</i>, p. 58.]</p> + +<p>[Footnote 2: Sparks's <i>Franklin</i>, ii. 372.]</p> + +<h2><a name="7-4"></a><a href="#TOC">FOUNDED ON A ROCK</a></h2> + +<p>If there is any one who is recognized as a fair exponent of our +national principles, it is our martyr-president Abraham Lincoln; whom +Lowell calls, in his noble Commemoration Ode at Cambridge,--</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>"New birth of our new soil, the first American."</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>What President Lincoln's political principle was, we know. On his +journey to Washington for his first inauguration he said, "I have never +had a feeling that did not spring from the sentiments embodied in the +Declaration of Independence." To find out what was his view of those +sentiments, we must go back several years earlier, and consider that +remarkable letter of his to the Boston Republicans who had invited him to +join them in celebrating Jefferson's birthday, in April, 1859. It was well +called by Charles Sumner "a gem in political literature;" and it seems to +me almost as admirable, in its way, as the Gettysburg address.</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>"The principles of Jefferson are the definitions and axioms of free +society. And yet they are denied and evaded with no small show of success. +One dashingly calls them 'glittering generalities.' Another bluntly styles +them 'self-evident lies.' And others insidiously argue that they apply +only to 'superior races.'"</p> + +<p>"These expressions, differing in form, are identical in object and +effect,-- the subverting the principles of free government, and restoring +those of classification, caste, and legitimacy. They would delight a +convocation of crowned heads plotting against the people. They are the +vanguard, the sappers and miners of returning despotism. We must repulse +them, or they will subjugate us."</p> + +<p>"All honor to Jefferson.'--the man who, in the concrete pressure of a +struggle for national independence by a single people, had the coolness, +forecast, and capacity to introduce into a merely revolutionary document +<i>an abstract truth applicable to all men and all times</i>, and so to +embalm it there that to-day and in all coming days it shall be a rebuke +and a stumbling- block to the harbingers of reappearing tyranny and +oppression."</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>The special "abstract truth" to which President Lincoln thus attaches a +value so great, and which he pronounces "applicable to all men and all +times," is evidently the assertion of the Declaration that governments +derive their just powers from the consent of the governed, following the +assertion that all men are born free and equal; that is, as some one has +well interpreted it, equally men. I do not see how any person but a dreamy +recluse can deny that the strength of our republic rests on these +principles; which are so thoroughly embedded in the average American mind +that they take in it, to some extent, the place occupied in the average +English mind by the emotion of personal loyalty to a certain reigning +family. But it is impossible to defend these principles logically, as +Senator Hoar has well pointed out, without recognizing that they are as +applicable to women as to men. If this is the case, the claim of women +rests on a right,--indeed, upon the same right which is the foundation of +all our institutions.</p> + +<p>The encouraging fact in the present condition of the whole matter is +not that we get more votes here or there for this or that form of woman +suffrage--for experience has shown that there are great ups and downs in +that respect; and States that at one time seemed nearest to woman +suffrage, as Maine and Kansas, now seem quite apathetic. But the real +encouragement is that the logical ground is more and more conceded; and +the point now usually made is not that the Jeffersonian maxim excludes +women, but that "the consent of the governed" is substantially given by +the general consent of women. That this argument has a certain +plausibility may be conceded; but it is equally clear that the minority of +women, those who do wish to vote, includes on the whole the natural +leaders,- -those who are foremost in activity of mind, in literature, in +art, in good works of charity. It is, therefore, pretty sure that they +only predict the opinions of the rest, who will follow them in time. And +even while waiting it is a fair question whether the "governed" have not +the right to give their votes when they wish, even if the majority of them +prefer to stay away from the polls. We do not repeal our naturalization +laws, although only the minority of our foreign-born inhabitants as yet +take the pains to become naturalized.</p> + +<h2><a name="7-5"></a><a href="#TOC">THE GOOD OF THE GOVERNED</a></h2> + +<p>In Paris, some years ago, I was for a time a resident in a cultivated +French family, where the father was non-committal in politics, the mother +and son were republicans, and the daughter was a Bonapartist. Asking the +mother why the young lady thus held to a different creed from the rest, I +was told that she had made up her mind that the streets of Paris were kept +cleaner under the empire than since its disappearance: hence her +imperialism.</p> + +<p>I have heard American men advocate the French empire at home and +abroad, without offering reasons so good as those of the lively French +maiden. But I always think of her remark when the question is seriously +asked, as Mr. Parkman, for instance, once gravely put it in "The North +American Review,"--"The real issue is this: Is the object of government +the good of the governed, or is it not?" Taken in a general sense, there +is probably no disposition to discuss this conundrum, for the simple +reason that nobody dissents from it. But the important point is: What does +"the good of the governed" mean? Does it merely mean better street +cleaning, or something more essential?</p> + +<p>There is nothing new in the distinction. Ever since De Tocqueville +wrote his "Democracy in America," forty years ago, this precise point has +been under active discussion. That acute writer himself recurs to it again +and again. Every government, he points out, nominally seeks the good of +the people, and rests on their will at last. But there is this difference: +A monarchy organizes better, does its work better, cleans the streets +better. Nevertheless De Tocqueville, a monarchist, sees this advantage in +a republic, that when all this is done by the people for themselves, +although the work done may be less perfect, yet the people themselves are +more enlightened, better satisfied, and, in the end, their good is better +served. Thus in one place he quotes "a writer of talent" who complains of +the want of administrative perfection in the United States, and says, "We +are indebted to centralization, that admirable invention of a great man, +for the uniform order and method which prevails alike in all the municipal +budgets (of France) from the largest town to the humblest commune." But, +says De Tocqueville,--</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>"Whatever may be my admiration of this result, when I see the communes +(municipalities) of France, with their excellent system of accounts, +plunged in the grossest ignorance of their true interests, and abandoned +to so incorrigible an apathy that they seem to vegetate rather than to +live; when, on the other hand, I observe the activity, the information, +and the spirit of enterprise which keeps society in perpetual labor, in +these American townships, whose budgets are drawn up with small method and +with still less uniformity,--I am struck by the spectacle; <i>for, to my +mind, the end of a good government is to insure the welfare of a +people</i>, and not to establish order and regularity in the midst of its +misery and its distress."[1]</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>The italics are my own; but it will be seen that he uses a phrase +almost identical with Mr. Parkman's, and that he uses it to show that +there is something to be looked at beyond good laws,--namely, the +beneficial effect of self-government. In another place he comes back to +the subject again:--</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>"It is incontestable that the people frequently conducts public +business very ill; but it is impossible that the lower order should take a +part in public business without extending the circle of their ideas, and +without quitting the ordinary routine of their mental acquirements; the +humblest individual who is called upon to cooperate in the government of +society acquires a certain degree of self-respect; and, as he possesses +authority, he can command the services of minds much more enlightened than +his own. He is canvassed by a multitude of applicants, who seek to deceive +him in a thousand different ways, but who instruct him by their deceit.... +Democracy does not confer the most skilful kind of government upon the +people; but it produces that which the most skilful governments are +frequently unable to awaken, namely, an all-pervading and restless +activity, a superabundant force, and an energy which is inseparable from +it, and which may, under favorable circumstances, beget the most amazing +benefits. These are the true advantages of democracy."[2]</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>These passages and others like them are worth careful study. They +clearly point out the two different standards by which we may criticise +all political systems. One class of thinkers, of whom Froude is the most +conspicuous, holds that the "good of the people" means good laws and good +administration, and that, if these are only provided, it makes no sort of +difference whether they themselves make the laws, or whether some Caesar +or Louis Napoleon provides them. All the traditions of the early and later +Federalists point this way. But it has always seemed to me a theory of +government essentially incompatible with American institutions. If we +could once get our people saturated with it, they would soon be at the +mercy of some Louis Napoleon of their own.</p> + +<p>When President Lincoln claimed, following Theodore Parker, that ours +was not merely a government for the people, but of the people, and by the +people as well, he recognized the other side of the matter,--that it is +not only important what laws we have, but who makes the laws; and that +"the end of a good government is to insure the welfare of a people," in +this far wider sense. That advantage which the French writer admits in +democracy, that it develops force, energy, and self-respect, is as +essentially a part of "the good of the governed" as is any perfection in +the details of government. And it is precisely these advantages which we +expect that women, sooner or later, are to share. For them, as for men, +"the good of the governed" is not genuine unless it is that kind of good +which belongs to the self-governed.</p> + +<p>[Footnote 1: Sparks's <i>Franklin</i>, ii. 372.]</p> + +<p>[Footnote 2: De Tocqueville, vol. ii. pp. 74, 75.]</p> + +<h2><a name="7-6"></a><a href="#TOC">RULING AT SECONDHAND</a></h2> + +<p>In the last century the bitter satirist, Charles Churchill, wrote a +verse which will do something to keep alive his name. It is as +follows:--</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>"Women ruled all; and ministers of state<br> + Were at the doors of women forced to wait,--<br> +Women, who we oft as sovereigns graced the land,<br> +But never governed well at second-hand."</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>He touches the very kernel of the matter, and all history is on his +side. The Salic Law excluded women from the throne of France,--"the +kingdom of France being too noble to be governed by a woman," as it said. +Accordingly the history of France shows one long line of royal mistresses +ruling in secret for mischief; while more liberal England points to the +reigns of Elizabeth and Anne and Victoria, to show how usefully a woman +may sit upon a throne.</p> + +<p>It was one of the merits of Margaret Fuller Ossoli, that she always +pointed out this distinction. "Any woman can have influence," she said, +"in some way. She need only to be a good cook or a good scold, to secure +that. Woman should not merely have a share in the power of man,--for of +that omnipotent Nature will not suffer her to be defrauded,--but it should +be a <i>chartered</i> power, too fully recognized to be abused." We have +got to meet, at any rate, this fact of feminine influence in the world. +Demosthenes said that the measures which a statesman had meditated for a +year might be overturned in a day by a woman. How infinitely more sensible +then, to train the woman herself in statesmanship, and give her open +responsibility as well as concealed power!</p> + +<p>The same demoralizing principle of subordination runs through the whole +position of women. Many a husband makes of his wife a doll, dresses her in +fine clothes, gives or withholds money according to his whims, and laughs +or frowns if she asks any questions about his business. If only a petted +slave, she naturally develops the vices of a slave; and when she wants +more money for more fine clothes, and finds her husband out of humor, she +coaxes, cheats, and lies. Many a woman half ruins her husband by her +extravagance, simply because he has never told her frankly what his income +is, or treated her, in money matters, like a rational being. Bankruptcy, +perhaps, brings both to their senses; and thenceforward the husband +discovers that his wife is a woman, not a child. But for want of this +whole families and generations of women are trained to deception. I knew +an instance where a fashionable dressmaker in New York urged an economical +young girl, about to be married, to buy of her a costly <i>trousseau</i> +or wedding outfit.</p> + +<p>"But I have not the money," said the maiden. "No matter," said the +complaisant tempter: "I will wait four years, and send in the bill to your +husband by degrees. Many ladies do it." Fancy the position of a pure young +girl, wishing innocently to make herself beautiful in the eyes of her +husband, and persuaded to go into his house with a trick like this upon +her conscience! Yet it grows directly out of the whole theory of life +which is preached to many women,--that all they seek must be won by +indirect manoeuvres, and not by straightforward living.</p> + +<p>It is a mistaken system. Once recognize woman as born to be the equal, +not inferior, of man, and she accepts as a right her share of the family +income, of political power, and of all else that is capable of +distribution. As it is, we are in danger of forgetting that woman, in mind +as in body, was-born to be upright. The women of Charles Reade--never by +any possibility moving in a straight line where it is possible to find a +crooked one--are distorted women; and Nature is no more responsible for +them than for the figures produced by tight lacing and by high-heeled +boots. These physical deformities acquire a charm, when the taste adjusts +itself to them; and so do those pretty tricks and those interminable lies. +But after all, to make a noble woman you must give a noble training.</p> + +<center> +<hr class="narrow"> +</center> +<h2 align="center"><a name="8"></a><a href="#TOC">VIII<br> + SUFFRAGE</a></h2> + +<blockquote> +<p>"No such phrase as virtual representation was ever known in law or +constitution. It is altogether a subtlety and illusion, wholly unfounded +and absurd. We must not be cheated by any such phantom or any other trick +of law and politics."--JAMES OTIS, quoted by Charles Sumner in speech, +March 7, 1866.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p> </p> + +<h2><a name="8-1"></a><a href="#TOC">DRAWING THE LINE</a></h2> + +<p>When in Dickens's "Nicholas Nickleby" the coal-heaver calls at the +fashionable barber's to be shaved, the barber declines that service. The +coal- heaver pleads that he saw a baker being shaved there the day before. +But the barber points out to him that it is necessary to draw the line +somewhere, and he draws it at bakers.</p> + +<p>It is, doubtless, an inconvenience, in respect to woman suffrage, that +so many people have their own theories as to drawing the line, and +deciding who shall vote. Each has his hobby; and as the opportunity for +applying it to men has passed by, each wishes to catch at the last +remaining chance, and apply it to women. One believes in drawing an +educational line; another, in a property qualification; another, in new +restrictions on naturalization; another, in distinctions of race; and each +wishes to keep women, for a time, as the only remaining victims for his +experiment.</p> + +<p>Fortunately the answer to all these objections, on behalf of woman +suffrage, is very brief and simple. It is no more the business of its +advocates to decide upon the best abstract basis for suffrage, than it is +to decide upon the best system of education, or of labor, or of marriage. +Its business is to equalize, in all these directions; nothing more. When +that is done, there will be plenty still left to do, without doubt; but it +will not involve the rights of women, as such. Simply to strike out the +word "male" from the statute,--that is our present work. "What is sauce +for the goose"--but the proverb is somewhat musty. These educational and +property restrictions may be of value; but wherever they are already +removed from the men they must be removed from women also. Enfranchise +them equally, and then begin afresh, if you please, to legislate for the +whole human race. What we protest against is that you should have let down +the bars for one sex, and should at once become conscientiously convinced +that they should be put up again for the other.</p> + +<p>When it was proposed to apply an educational qualification at the South +after the war, the Southern white loyalists all objected to it. If you +make it universal, they said, it cuts off many of the whites. If you apply +it to the blacks alone, it is manifestly unjust. The case is the same with +women in regard to men. As woman needs the ballot primarily to protect +herself, it is manifestly unjust to restrict the suffrage for her, when +man has it without restriction. If she needs protection, then she needs it +all the more from being poor, or ignorant, or Irish, or black. If we do +not see this, the freedwomen of the South did. There is nothing like +personal wrong to teach people logic.</p> + +<p>We hear a great deal said in dismay, and sometimes even by old +abolitionists, about "increasing the number of ignorant voters." In +Massachusetts, there is an educational restriction for men, such as it is; +in Rhode Island, a property qualification is required for voting on +certain questions. Personally, I believe with "Warrington," that, if +ignorant voting be bad, ignorant non-voting is worse; and that the +enfranchised "masses," which have a legitimate outlet for their political +opinions, are far less dangerous than disfranchised masses, which must +rely on mobs and strikes. I will go farther, and say that I believe our +republic is, on the whole, in less danger from its poor men, who have got +to stay in it and bring up their children, than from its rich men, who +have always Paris and London to fall back upon. I do not see that even a +poll-tax or registry-tax is of any use as a safeguard; for if men are to +be bought the tax merely offers a more indirect and palatable form in +which to pay the price. Many a man consents to have his poll-tax paid by +his party or his candidate, when he would reject the direct offer of a +dollar bill.</p> + +<p>But this is all private speculation, and has nothing to do with the +woman- suffrage movement. All that we can ask, as advocates of this +reform, is that the inclusion or the exclusion should be the same for both +sexes. We cannot put off the equality of woman till that time, a few +centuries hence, when the Social Science Association shall have succeeded +in agreeing on the true basis of "scientific legislation." It is as if we +urged that wives should share their husbands' dinners, and were told that +the physicians had not decided whether beefsteak were wholesome. The +answer is, "Beefsteak or tripe, yeast or saleratus, which you please. But, +meanwhile, what is good enough for the wife is good enough for the +husband."</p> + +<h2><a name="8-2"></a><a href="#TOC">FOR SELF-PROTECTION</a></h2> + +<p>I remember to have read, many years ago, the life of Sir Samuel +Romilly, the English philanthropist. He was the author of more beneficent +legal reforms than any man of his day, and there was in that very book a +long list of the changes he still meant to bring about. It struck me very +much, that among these proposed reforms not one of any importance referred +to the laws about women.</p> + +<p>It shows--what all experience has shown--that no class or race or sex +can safely trust its protection in any hands but its own. The laws of +England in regard to woman were then so bad that Lord Brougham afterwards +said they needed total reconstruction, if they were to be touched at all. +Yet it is only since woman suffrage began to be talked about, that the +work of law-reform has really taken firm hold. In many cases in America +the beneficent measures are directly to be traced to some appeal from +feminine advocates. Even in Canada, as was once stated by Dr. Cameron of +Toronto, the bill protecting the property of married women was passed +under the immediate pressure of Lucy Stone's eloquence. And even where +this direct agency could not be traced, the general fact that the +atmosphere was full of the agitation had much to do with all the reforms +that took place. Legislatures, unwilling to give woman the ballot, were +shamed into giving her something. The chairman of the judiciary committee +in Rhode Island told me that until he heard women argue before the +committee he had not reflected upon their legal disabilities, or thought +how unjust these were. While the matter was left to the other sex only, +even men like Sir Samuel Romilly forgot the wrongs of woman. When she +began to advocate her own cause men also waked up.</p> + +<p>But now that they are awake they ask, Is not this sufficient? Not at +all If an agent who has cheated you surrenders reluctantly one half your +stolen goods, you do not stop there and say, "It is enough. Your intention +is honorable. Please continue my agent with increased pay." On the +contrary, you say, "Your admission of wrong is a plea of guilty. Give me +the rest of what is mine." There is no defence like self-defence, no +protection like self-protection.</p> + +<p>All theories of chivalry and generosity and vicarious representation +fall before the fact that woman has been grossly wronged by man. That +being the case, the only modest and honest thing for man to do is to say, +"Henceforward have a voice in making your own laws." Till this is done, +she has no sure safeguard, since otherwise the same men who made the old +barbarous laws may at any time restore them.</p> + +<p>It is common to say that woman suffrage will make no great difference; +that women will think very much as men do, and it will simply double the +vote without varying the result. About many matters this may be true. To +be sure, it is probable that on questions of conscience, like slavery and +temperance, the woman's vote would by no means coincide with man's. But +grant that it would. The fact remains,--and all history shows it,--that on +all that concerns her own protection a woman needs her own vote. Would a +woman vote to give her husband the power of bequeathing her children to +the control and guardianship of somebody else? Would a woman vote to +sustain the law by which a Massachusetts chief justice bade the police +take those crying children from their mother's side in the Boston +court-room a few years ago, and hand them over to a comparative stranger, +because that mother had married again? You might as well ask whether the +colored vote would sustain the Dred Scott decision. Tariffs or banks may +come or go the same, whether the voters be white or black, male or female; +but when the wrongs of an oppressed class or sex are to be righted the +ballot is the only guaranty. After they have gained a potential voice for +themselves, the Sir Samuel Romillys will remember them.</p> + +<h2><a name="8-3"></a><a href="#TOC">WOMANLY STATESMANSHIP</a></h2> + +<p>The newspapers periodically express a desire to know whether women have +given evidence, on the whole, of superior statesmanship to men. There are +constant requests that they will define their position as to the tariff +and the fisheries and the civil-service question. If they do not speak, it +is naturally assumed that they will forever after hold their peace. Let us +see how that matter stands.</p> + +<p>It is said that the greatest mechanical skill in America is to be found +among professional burglars who come here from England. Suppose one of +these men were in prison, and we were to stand outside and taunt him +through the window: "Here is a locomotive engine: why do you not mend or +manage it? Here is a steam printing-press: if you know anything, set it up +for me! You a mechanic, when you have not proved that you understand any +of these things? Nonsense!"</p> + +<p>But Jack Sheppard, if he condescended to answer us at all, would coolly +say, "Wait a while, till I have finished my present job. Being in prison, +my first business is to get out of prison. Wait till I have picked this +lock, and mined this wall; wait till I have made a saw out of a +watch-spring, and a ladder out of a pair of blankets. Let me do my first +task, and get out of limbo, and then see if your little printing-presses +and locomotives are too puzzling for my fingers."</p> + +<p>Politically speaking, woman is in jail, and her first act of skill must +be in getting through the wall. For her there is no tariff question, no +problem of the fisheries. She will come to that by and by, if you please; +but for the present her statesmanship must be employed nearer home. The +"civil-service reform" in which she is most concerned is a reform which +shall bring her in contact with the civil service. Her political creed, +for the present, is limited to that of Sterne's starling in the cage,--"I +can't get out." If she is supposed to have any common-sense at all, she +will best show it by beginning at the point where she is, instead of at +the point where somebody else is. She would indeed be as foolish as these +editors think her if she now spent her brains upon the tariff question, +which she cannot reach, instead of upon her own enfranchisement, which she +is gradually reaching.</p> + +<p>The woman-suffrage movement in America, in all its stages and +subdivisions, has been the work of woman. No doubt men have helped in it: +much of the talking has been done by them, and they have furnished many of +the printed documents. But the energy, the methods, the unwearied purpose, +of the movement, have come from women: they have led in all councils; they +have established the newspapers, got up the conventions, addressed the +legislatures, and raised the money. Thirty years have shown, with whatever +temporary variations, one vast wave of progress toward success, both in +this country and in Europe. Now success is statesmanship.</p> + +<p>I remember well the shouts of laughter that used to greet the +anti-slavery orators when they claimed that the real statesmen of the +country were not the Clays and Calhouns, who spent their strength in +trying to sustain slavery, and failed, but the Garrisons, who devoted +their lives to its overthrow, and were succeeding. Yet who now doubts +this? Tried by the same standard, the statesmanship of to-day does not lie +in the men who can find no larger questions before them than those which +concern the fisheries, but in the women whose far- reaching efforts will +one day make every existing voting-list so much waste paper.</p> + +<p>Of course, when the voting-lists with the women's names are ready to be +printed, it will be interesting to speculate as to how these new monarchs +of our destiny will use their power. For myself, a long course of +observation in the anti-slavery and woman-suffrage movements has satisfied +me that women are not idiots, and that, on the whole, when they give their +minds to a question, whether moral or practical, they understand it quite +as readily as men. In the anti-slavery movement it is certain that a +woman, Elizabeth Heyrick, gave the first impulse to its direct and simple +solution in England; and that another woman, Mrs. Stowe, did more than any +man, except perhaps Garrison and John Brown, to secure its right solution +here. There was never a moment, I am confident, when any great political +question growing out of the anti-slavery struggle might not have been put +to vote more safely among the women of New England than among the clergy, +or the lawyers, or the college professors. If they did so well in that +great issue, it is fair to assume that, after they have a sufficient +inducement to study out future issues, they at least will not be very much +behind the men.</p> + +<p>But we cannot keep it too clearly in view, that the whole question, +whether women would vote better or worse than men on general questions, is +a minor matter. It was equally a minor matter in case of the negroes. We +gave the negroes the ballot, simply because they needed it for their own +protection; and we shall by and by give it to women for the same reason. +Tried by that test, we shall find that their statesmanship will be +genuine. When they come into power, drunken husbands will no longer +control their wives' earnings, and a chief justice will no longer order a +child to be removed from its mother, amid its tears and outcries, merely +because that mother has married again. And if, as we are constantly +assured, woman's first duty is to her home and her children, she may count +it a good beginning in statesmanship to secure to herself the means of +protecting both. That once settled, it will be time enough to "interview" +her in respect to the proper rate of duty on pig-iron.</p> + +<h2><a name="8-4"></a><a href="#TOC">TOO MUCH PREDICTION</a></h2> + +<p>"Seek not to proticipate," says Mrs. Gamp, the venerable nurse in +"Martin Chuzzlewit"--"but take 'em as they come, and as they go." I am +persuaded that our woman-suffrage arguments would be improved by this sage +counsel, and that at present we indulge in too many bold +anticipations.</p> + +<p>Is there not altogether too much tendency to predict what women will do +when they vote? Could that good time come to-morrow, we should be startled +to find to how many different opinions and "causes" the new voters were +already pledged. One speaker wishes that women should be emancipated, +because of the fidelity with which they are sure to support certain +desirable measures, as peace, order, freedom, temperance, righteousness, +and judgment to come. Then the next speaker has his or her schedule of +political virtues and is equally confident that women, if once +enfranchised, will guarantee clear majorities for them all. The trouble is +that we thus mortgage this new party of the future, past relief, beyond +possibility of payment, and incur the ridicule of the unsanctified by +committing our cause to a great many contradictory pledges.</p> + +<p>I know an able and high-minded woman of foreign birth, who +courageously, but as I think mistakenly, calls herself an atheist, and who +has for years advocated woman suffrage as the only antidote to the rule of +the clergy. On the other hand, an able speaker in a Boston convention soon +after advocated the same thing as the best way of defeating atheism, and +securing the positive assertion of religion by the community. Both cannot +be correct: neither is entitled to speak for woman. That being the case, +would it not be better to keep clear of this dangerous ground of +prediction, and keep to the argument based on rights and needs? If our +theory of government be worth anything, woman has the same right to the +ballot that man has: she certainly needs it as much for self-defence. How +she will use it, when she gets it, is her own affair. It may be that she +will use it more wisely than her brothers; but I am satisfied to believe +that she will use it as well. Let us not attribute infallible wisdom and +virtue, even to women; for, as dear Mrs. Poyser says in "Adam Bede," "God +Almighty made some of 'em foolish, to match the men."</p> + +<p>It is common to assume, for instance, that all women by nature favor +peace; and that, even if they do not always seem to promote it in their +social walk and conversation, they certainly will in their political. When +we consider how all the pleasing excitements, achievements, and glories of +war, such as they are, accrue to men only, and how large a part of the +miseries are brought home to women, it might seem that their vote on this +matter, at least, would be a sure thing. Thus far the theory: the fact +being that we have been through a civil war which convulsed the nation, +and cost half a million lives; and which was, from the very beginning, +fomented, stimulated, and applauded, at least on one side, by the united +voice of the women. It will be generally admitted by those who know, that, +but for the women of the seceding States, the war of the Rebellion would +have been waged more feebly, been sooner ended, and far more easily +forgotten. Nay, I was told a few days since by an able Southern lawyer, +who was long the mayor of one of the largest Southern cities, that in his +opinion the practice of duelling--which is an epitome of war--owes its +continued existence at the South to a sustaining public sentiment among +the fair sex.</p> + +<p>Again, where the sympathy of women is wholly on the side of right, it +is by no means safe to assume that their mode of enforcing that sentiment +will be equally judicious. Take, for instance, the temperance cause. It is +quite common to assume that women are a unit on that question. When we +look at the two extremes of society,--the fine lady pressing wine upon her +visitors, and the Irishwoman laying in a family supply of whiskey to last +over Sunday,--the assumption seems hasty. But grant it. Is it equally +sure, that when woman takes hold of that most difficult of all +legislation, the license and prohibitory laws, she will handle them more +wisely than men have done? Will her more ardent zeal solve the problem on +which so much zeal has already been lavished in vain? In large cities, for +instance, where there is already more law than is enforced, will her +additional ballots afford the means to enforce it? It may be so; but it +seems wiser not to predict nor to anticipate, but to wait and hope.</p> + +<p>It is no reproach on woman to say that she is not infallible on +particular questions. There is much reason to suppose that in politics, as +in every other sphere, the joint action of the sexes will be better and +wiser than that of either singly. It seems obvious that the experiment of +republican government will be more fairly tried when one half the race is +no longer disfranchised. It is quite certain, at any rate, that no class +can trust its rights to the mercy and chivalry of any other, but that, the +weaker it is, the more it needs all political aids and securities for +self-protection. Thus far we are on safe ground; and here, as it seems to +me, the claim for suffrage may securely rest. To go farther in our +assertions seems to me unsafe, although many of our wisest and most +eloquent may differ from me; and the nearer we approach success, the more +important it is to look to our weapons. It is a plausible and tempting +argument, to claim suffrage for woman on the ground that she is an angel; +but I think it will prove wiser, in the end, to claim it for her as being +human.</p> + +<h2><a name="8-5"></a><a href="#TOC">FIRST-CLASS CARRIAGES</a></h2> + +<p>In a hotly contested municipal election, the other day, an active +political manager was telling me his tactics. "We have to send carriages +for some of the voters," he said. "First-class carriages! If we undertake +to wait on 'em, we must do it in good shape, and not leave the best +carriages to be hired by the other party."</p> + +<p>I am not much given to predicting just what will happen when women +vote; but I confidently assert that they will be taken to the polls, if +they wish, in first-class carriages. If the best horses are to be +harnessed, and the best cushions selected, and every panel of the coach +rubbed till you can see your face in it, merely to accommodate some +elderly man who lives two blocks away, and could walk to the polls very +easily, then how much more will these luxuries be placed at the service of +every woman, young or old, whose presence at the polls is made doubtful by +mud, or snow, or the prospect of a shower.</p> + +<p>But the carriage is only the beginning of the polite attentions that +will soon appear. When we see the transformation undergone by every +ferryboat and every railway station, so soon as it comes to be frequented +by women, who can doubt that voting-places will experience the same +change? They will soon have-- at least in the "ladies' +department"--elegance instead of discomfort, beauty for ashes, plenty of +rocking-chairs, and no need of spittoons. Very possibly they may have all +the modern conveniences and inconveniences,--furnace registers, +teakettles, Washington pies, and a young lady to give checks for bundles. +Who knows what elaborate comforts, what queenly luxuries, may be offered +to women at voting-places, when the time has finally arrived to sue for +their votes?</p> + +<p>The common impression has always been quite different from this. People +look at the coarseness and dirt now visible at so many voting-places, and +say, "Would you expose women to all that?" But these places are not +dirtier than a railway smoking-car; and there is no more coarseness than +in any ferryboat which is, for whatever reason, used by men only. You do +not look into those places, and say with indignation, "Never, if I can +help it, shall my wife or my beloved great- grandmother travel by +steamboat or by rail!" You know that with these exemplary relatives will +enter order and quiet, carpets and curtains, brooms and dusters. Why +should it be otherwise with ward rooms and town halls?</p> + +<p>There is not an atom more of intrinsic difficulty in providing a +decorous ladies' room for a voting-place, than for a post-office or a +railway station; and it is as simple a thing to vote a ticket as to buy +one. This being thus easily practicable, all men will desire to provide +it. And the example of the first-class carriages shows that the parties +will vie with each other in these pleasing arrangements. They will be +driven to it, whether they wish it or not. The party which has most +consistently and resolutely kept woman away from the ballot-box will be +the very party compelled, for the sake of self-preservation, to make her +"rights" agreeable to her when once she gets them. A few stupid or noisy +men may indeed try to make the polls unattractive to her, the very first +time; but the result of this little experiment will be so disastrous that +the offenders will be sternly suppressed by their own party leaders, +before another election day comes. It will soon become clear, that of all +possible ways of losing votes the surest lies in treating women +rudely.</p> + +<p>Lucy Stone tells a story of a good man in Kansas who, having done all +he could to prevent women from being allowed to vote on school questions, +was finally comforted, when that measure passed, by the thought that he +should at least secure his wife's vote for a pet schoolhouse of his own. +Election day came, and the newly enfranchised matron showed the most +culpable indifference to her privileges. She made breakfast as usual, went +about her housework, and did on that perilous day precisely the things +that her anxious husband had always predicted that women never would do +under such circumstances. His hints and advice found no response; and +nothing short of the best pair of horses and the best wagon finally +sufficed to take the farmer's wife to the polls. I am not the least afraid +that women will find voting a rude or disagreeable arrangement. There is +more danger of their being treated too well, and being too much attacked +and allured by these cheap cajoleries. But women are pretty shrewd, and +can probably be trusted to go to the polls, even in first-class +carriages.</p> + +<h2><a name="8-6"></a><a href="#TOC">EDUCATION <i>via</i> +SUFFRAGE</a></h2> + +<p>I know a rich bachelor of large property who fatigues his friends by +perpetual denunciations of everything American, and especially of +universal suffrage. He rarely votes; and I was much amazed, when the +popular vote was to be taken on building an expensive schoolhouse, to see +him go to the polls, and vote in the affirmative. On being asked his +reason, he explained that, while we labored under the calamity of +universal (male) suffrage, he thought it best to mitigate its evils by +educating the voters. In short, he wished, as Mr. Lowe said in England +when the last Reform Bill passed, "to prevail upon our future masters to +learn their alphabets."</p> + +<p>These motives may not be generous; but the schoolhouses, when they are +built, are just as useful. Even girls get the benefit of them, though the +long delay in many places before girls got their share came in part from +the want of this obvious stimulus. It is universal male suffrage that +guarantees schoolhouse and school. The most selfish man understands that +argument: "We must educate the masses, if it is only to keep them from our +throats."</p> + +<p>But there is a wider way in which suffrage guarantees education. At +every election time political information is poured upon the whole voting +community till it is deluged. Presses run night and day to print newspaper +extras; clerks sit up all night to send out congressional speeches; the +most eloquent men in the community expound the most difficult matters to +the ignorant. Of course each party affords only its own point of view; but +every man has a neighbor who is put under treatment by some other party, +and who is constantly attacking all who will listen to his provoking and +pestilent counter-statements. All the common school education of the +United States does not equal the education of election day; and as in some +States elections are held very often, this popular university seems to be +kept in session almost the whole year round. The consequence is a +remarkable average popular knowledge of political affairs,--a training +which American women now miss, but which will come to them with the +ballot.</p> + +<p>And in still another way there will be an education coming to woman +from the right of suffrage. It will come from her own sex, proceeding from +highest to lowest. We often hear it said that after enfranchisement the +more educated women will not vote, while the ignorant will. But Mrs. Howe +admirably pointed out, at a Philadelphia convention, that the moment women +have the ballot it will become the pressing duty of the more educated +women, even in self-protection, to train the rest The very fact of the +danger will be a stimulus to duty, with women, as it already is with +men.</p> + +<p>It has always seemed to me rather childish, in a man of superior +education, or talent, or wealth, to complain that when election day comes +he has no more votes than the man who plants his potatoes or puts in his +coal The truth is that under the most thorough system of universal +suffrage the man of wealth or talent or natural leadership has still a +disproportionate influence, still casts a hundred votes where the poor or +ignorant or feeble man throws but one. Even the outrages of New York +elections turned out to be caused by the fact that the leading rogues had +used their brains and energy, while the men of character had not. When it +came to the point, it was found that a few caricatures by Nast and a few +columns of figures in the "Times" were more than a match for all the +repeaters of the ring. It is always so. Andrew Johnson, with all the +patronage of the nation, had not the influence of "Nasby" with his one +newspaper. The whole Chinese question was perceptibly and instantly +modified when Harte wrote "The Heathen Chinee."</p> + +<p>These things being so, it indicates feebleness or dyspepsia when an +educated man is heard whining, about election time, with his fears of +ignorant voting. It is his business to enlighten and control that +ignorance. With a voice and a pen at his command, with a town hall in +every town for the one, and a newspaper in every village for the other, he +has such advantages over his ignorant neighbors that the only doubt is +whether his privileges are not greater than he deserves. For one, in +writing for the press, I am impressed by the undue greatness, not by the +littleness, of the power I wield. And what is true of men will be true of +women. If the educated women of America have not brains or energy enough +to control, in the long run, the votes of the ignorant women around them, +they will deserve a severe lesson, and will be sure, like the men in New +York, to receive it. And thenceforward they will educate and guide that +ignorance, instead of evading or cringing before it.</p> + +<p>But I have no fear about the matter. It is a libel on American women to +say that they will not go anywhere or do anything which is for the good of +their children and their husbands. Travel West on any of our great lines +of railroad, and see what women undergo in transporting their households +to their new homes. See the watching and the feeding, and the endless +answers to the endless questions, and the toil to keep little Sarah warm, +and little Johnny cool, and the baby comfortable. What a hungry, tired, +jaded, forlorn mass of humanity it is, as the sun rises on it each +morning, in the soiled and breathless railway- car! Yet that household +group is America in the making; those are the future kings and queens, the +little princes and princesses, of this land. Now, is the mother who has +undergone for the transportation of these children all this enormous labor +to shrink at her journey's end from the slight additional labor of going +to the polls to vote whether those little ones shall have schools or +rumshops? The thought is an absurdity. A few fine ladies in cities will +fear to spoil their silk dresses, as a few foppish gentlemen now fear for +their broadcloth. But the mass of intelligent American women will vote, as +do the mass of men.</p> + +<h2><a name="8-7"></a><a href="#TOC">FOLLOW YOUR LEADERS</a></h2> + +<p>"There go thirty thousand men," shouted the Portuguese, as Wellington, +with a few staff-officers, rode along the mountain-side. The action of the +leaders' minds, in any direction, has a value out of all proportion to +their numbers. In a campaign there is a council of officers,--Grant and +Sherman and Sheridan perhaps. They are but a trifling minority, yet what +they plan the whole army will do; and such is the faith in a real leader, +that, were all the restraints of discipline for the moment relaxed, the +rank and file would still follow his judgment. What a few general officers +see to be the best to-day, the sergeants and corporals and private +soldiers will usually see to be best to-morrow.</p> + +<p>In peace, also, there is a silent leadership; only that in peace, as +there is more time to spare, the leaders are expected to persuade the rank +and file, instead of commanding them. Yet it comes to the same thing in +the end. The movement begins with certain guides, and if you wish to know +the future, keep your eye on them. If you wish to know what is already +decided, ask the majority; but if you wish to find out what is likely to +be done next, ask the leaders.</p> + +<p>It is constantly said that the majority of women do not yet desire to +vote, and it is true. But to find out whether they are likely to wish for +it, we must keep our eyes on the women who lead their sex. The +representative women,--those who naturally stand for the rest, those most +eminent for knowledge and self- devotion,--how do they view the thing? The +rank and file do not yet demand the ballot, you say; but how is it with +the general officers?</p> + +<p>Now, it is a remarkable fact, about which those who have watched this +movement for twenty years can hardly be mistaken, that almost any woman +who reaches a certain point of intellectual or moral development will +presently be found desiring the ballot for her sex. If this be so, it +predicts the future. It is the judgment of Grant and Sherman and Sheridan +as against that of the average private soldier of the Two Hundredth +Infantry. Set aside, if you please, the specialists of this particular +agitation,--those who were first known to the public through its advocacy. +There is no just reason why they should be set aside, yet concede that for +a moment. The fact remains that the ablest women in the land--those who +were recognized as ablest in other spheres, before they took this +particular duty upon them--are extremely apt to assume this cross when +they reach a certain stage of development.</p> + +<p>When Margaret Fuller first came forward into literature, she supposed +that literature was all she wanted. It was not till she came to write upon +woman's position that she discovered what woman needed. Clara Barton, +driving her ambulance or her supply wagon at the battle's edge, did not +foresee, perhaps, that she should make that touching appeal, when the +battle was over, imploring her own enfranchisement from the soldiers she +had befriended. Lydia Maria Child, Julia Ward Howe, Harriet Beecher Stowe, +Louisa Alcott, came to the claim for the ballot earlier than a million +others, because they were the intellectual leaders of American womanhood. +They saw farthest, because they were in the highest place. They were the +recognized representatives of their sex before they gave in their adhesion +to the new demand. Their judgment is as the judgment of the council of +officers, while Flora McFlimsey's opinion is as the opinion of John Smith, +unassigned recruit. But if the generals make arrangements for a battle, +the chance is that John Smith will have to take a hand in it, or else run +away.</p> + +<p>It is a rare thing for the petition for suffrage from any town to +comprise the majority of women in that town. It makes no difference: if +there are few women in the town who want to vote, there is as much +propriety in their voting as if there were ten millions, so long as the +majority are equally protected in their right to stay at home. But when +the names of petitioners come to be weighed as well as counted, the +character, the purity, the intelligence, the social and domestic value of +the petitioners is seldom denied. The women who wish to vote are not the +idle, the ignorant, the narrow-minded, or the vicious; they are not "the +dangerous classes:" they represent the best class in the community, when +tried by the highest standard. They are the natural leaders. What they now +see to be right will also be perceived even by the foolish and the +ignorant by and by.</p> + +<p>In a poultry-yard in spring, when the first brood of duckling's goes +toddling to the waterside, no doubt all the younger or feebler broods, +just hatched out of similar eggs, think these innovators dreadfully +mistaken. "You are out of place," they feebly pipe. "See how happy we are +in our safe nests. Perhaps, by and by, when properly introduced into +society, we may run about a little on land, but to swim!--never!" +Meanwhile their elder kindred are splashing and diving in ecstasy; and, so +surely as they are born ducklings, all the rest will swim in their turn. +The instinct of the first duck solves the problem for all the rest. It is +a mere question of time. Sooner or later, all the broods in the most +conservative yard will follow their leaders.</p> + +<h2><a name="8-8"></a><a href="#TOC">HOW TO MAKE WOMEN UNDERSTAND +POLITICS</a></h2> + +<p>An English member of Parliament said in a speech, some years ago, that +the stupidest man had a clearer understanding of political questions than +the brightest woman. He did not find it convenient to say what must be the +condition of a nation which for many years has had a woman for its +sovereign; but he certainly said bluntly what many men feel. It is not +indeed very hard to find the source of this feeling. It is not merely that +women are inexperienced in questions of finance or administrative +practice, for many men are equally ignorant of these. But it is +undoubtedly true of a large class of more fundamental questions,--as, for +instance, of some now pending at Washington,-- which even many +clear-headed women find it hard to understand, while men of far less +general training comprehend them entirely.</p> + +<p>Questions of the distribution of power, for instance, between the +executive, judicial, and legislative branches of government,--or between +the United States government and those of the separate States,--belong to +the class I mean. Many women of great intelligence show a hazy +indistinctness of views when the question arises whether it is the +business of the general government to preserve order at the voting-places +at a congressional election, for instance, as the Republicans hold; or +whether it should be left absolutely in the hands of the state officials, +as the Democrats maintain. Most women would probably say that so long as +order was preserved, it made very little difference who did it. Yet, if +one goes into a shoe-shop or a blacksmith's shop, one may hear just these +questions discussed in all their bearings by uneducated men, and it will +be seen that they involve a principle. Why is this difference? Does it +show some constitutional inferiority in women, as to this particular +faculty?</p> + +<p>The question is best solved by considering a case somewhat parallel. +The South Carolina negroes were considered very stupid, even by many who +knew than; and they certainly were densely ignorant on many subjects. Put +face to face with a difficult point of finance legislation, I think they +would have been found to know even less about it than I do. Yet the +abolition of slavery was held in those days by many great statesmen to be +a subject so difficult that they shrank from discussing it; and +nevertheless I used to find that these ignorant men understood it quite +clearly in all its bearings. Offer a bit of sophistry to them, try to +blind them with false logic on this subject, and they would detect it as +promptly, and answer it as keenly, as Garrison or Phillips would have +done; and, indeed, they would give very much the same answers. What was +the reason? Not that they were half wise and half stupid; but that they +were dull where their own interests had not trained them, and they were +sharp and keen where their own interests were concerned.</p> + +<p>I have no doubt that it will be so with women when they vote. About +some things they will be slow to learn; but about all that immediately +concerns themselves they will know more at the very beginning than many +wise men have learned since the world began. How long it took for +English-speaking men to correct, even partially, the iniquities of the old +common law!--but a parliament of women would have set aside at a single +sitting the alleged right of the husband to correct his wife with a stick +no bigger than his thumb. It took the men of a certain State of this Union +a good many years to see that it was an outrage to confiscate to the State +one half the property of a man who died childless, leaving his widow only +the other half; but a legislature of women would have annihilated that +enormity by a single day's work. I have never seen reason to believe that +women on general questions would act more wisely or more conscientiously, +as a rule, than men: but self-preservation is a wonderful quickener of the +brain; and in all questions bearing on their own rights and opportunities +as women, it is they who will prove shrewd and keen, and men who will +prove obtuse, as indeed they have usually been.</p> + +<p>Another point that adds force to this is the fact that wherever women, +by their special position, have more at stake than usual in public +affairs, even as now organized, they are apt to be equal to the occasion. +When the men of South Carolina were ready to go to war for the +"State-Rights" doctrines of Calhoun, the women of that State had also +those doctrines at their fingers'-ends. At Washington, where politics make +the breath of life, you will often find the wives of members of Congress +following the debates, and noting every point gained or lost, because +these are matters in which they and their families are personally +concerned; and as for that army of women employed in the "departments" of +the government, they are politicians every one, because their bread +depends upon it.</p> + +<p>The inference is, that if women as a class are now unfitted for +politics it is because they have not that pressure of personal interest +and responsibility by which men are unconsciously trained. Give this, and +self-interest will do the rest, aided by that power of conscience and +affection which is certainly not less in them than in men, even if we +claim no more. A young lady of my acquaintance opposed woman suffrage in +conversation on various grounds, one of which was that it would, if +enacted, compel her to read the newspapers, which she greatly disliked. I +pleaded that this was not a fatal objection; since many men voted "early +and often" without reading them, and in fact without knowing how to read +at all. She said, in reply, that this might do for men, but that women +were far more conscientious, and, if they were once compelled to vote, +they would wish to know what they were voting for. This seemed to me to +contain the whole philosophy of the matter; and I respected the keenness +of her suggestion, though it led me to an opposite conclusion.</p> + +<h2><a name="8-9"></a><a href="#TOC">INFERIOR TO MAN, AND NEAR TO +ANGELS</a></h2> + +<p>If it were anywhere the custom to disfranchise persons of superior +virtue because of their virtue, and to present others with the ballot, +simply because they had been in the state prison,--then the exclusion of +women from political rights would be a high compliment, no doubt. But I +can find no record in history of any such legislation, unless so far as it +is contained in the doubtful tradition of the Tuscan city of Pistoia, +where men are said to have been ennobled as a punishment for crime. Among +us crime may often be a covert means of political prominence, but it is +not the ostensible ground; nor are people habitually struck from the +voting-lists for performing some rare and eminent service, such as saving +human life, or reading every word of a presidential message. If a man has +been President of the United States, we do not disfranchise him +thenceforward; if he has been governor, we do not declare him thenceforth +ineligible to the office of United States senator. On the contrary, the +supposed reward of high merit is to give higher civic privileges. +Sometimes these are even forced on unwilling recipients, as when Plymouth +Colony in 1633 imposed a fine of twenty pounds on any one who should +refuse the office of governor.</p> + +<p>It is utterly contrary to all tradition and precedent, therefore, to +suppose that women have been hitherto disfranchised because of any +supposed superiority. Indeed, the theory is self-annihilating, and has +always involved all supporters in hopeless inconsistency. Thus the +Southern slaveholders were wont to argue that a negro was only blest when +a slave, and there was no such inhumanity as to free him. Then, if a slave +happened to save his master's life, he was rewarded by emancipation +immediately, amid general applause. The act refuted the theory. And so, +every time we have disfranchised a rebel, or presented some eminent +foreigner with the freedom of a city, we have recognized that +enfranchisement, after all, means honor, and disfranchisement implies +disgrace.</p> + +<p>I do not see how any woman can avoid a thrill of indignation when she +first opens her eyes to the fact that it is really contempt, not +reverence, that has so long kept her sex from an equal share of legal, +political, and educational rights. In spite of the duty paid to individual +women as mothers, in spite of the reverence paid by the Greeks and the +Germanic races to certain women as priestesses and sibyls, the fact +remains that this sex has been generally recognized, in past ages of the +human race, as stamped by hopeless inferiority, not by angelic +superiority. This is carried so far that a certain taint of actual +inferiority is held to attach to women, in barbarous nations. Among +certain Indian tribes, the service of the gods is defiled if a woman but +touches the implements of sacrifice; and a Turk apologizes to a Christian +physician for the mention of the women of his family, in the very phrases +used to soften the mention of any degrading creature. Mr. Leland tells us +that among the English gypsies any object that a woman treads upon, or +sweeps with the skirts of her dress, is destroyed or made away with in +some way, as unfit for use. In reading the history of manners, it is easy +to trace the steps from this degradation up to the point now attained, +such as it is. Yet even the habit of physiological contempt is not gone, +and I do not see how any one can read history without seeing, all around +us, in society, education, and politics, the tradition of inferiority. +Many laws and usages which in themselves might not strike all women as +intrinsically worth striving for--as the exclusion of women from colleges +or from the ballot-box--assume great importance to a woman's self-respect, +when she sees in these the plain survival of the same contempt that once +took much grosser forms.</p> + +<p>And it must be remembered that in civilized communities the cynics, who +still frankly express this utter contempt, are better friends to women +than the flatterers, who conceal it in the drawing-room, and only utter it +freely in the lecture-room, the club, and the "North American Review." +Contempt at least arouses pride and energy. To be sure, in the face of +history, the contemptuous tone in regard to women seems to me untrue, +unfair, and dastardly; but, like any other extreme injustice, it leads to +reaction. It helps to awaken women from that shallow dream of +self-complacency into which flattery lulls them. There is something tonic +in the manly arrogance of Fitzjames Stephen, who derides the thought that +the marriage contract can be treated as in any sense a contract between +equals; but there is something that debilitates in the dulcet counsel +given by an anonymous gentleman, in an old volume of the "Ladies' +Magazine" that lies before me,--"She ought to present herself as a being +made to please, to love, and to seek support; <i>a being inferior to man, +and near to angels</i>."</p> + +<center> +<hr class="narrow"> +</center> +<h2 align="center"><a name="9"></a><a href="#TOC">IX<br> + OBJECTIONS TO SUFFRAGE.</a></h2> + +<blockquote> +<p>"When you were weak and I was strong, I toiled for you. Now you are +strong and I am weak. Because of my work for you, I ask your aid. I ask +the ballot for myself and my sex. As I stood by you, I pray you stand by +me and mine."--CLARA BARTON.</p> + +<p>[Appeal to the returned soldiers of the United States, written from +Geneva, Switzerland, by Clara Barton, invalidated by long service in the +hospitals and on the field daring the civil war.]</p> +</blockquote> + +<p> </p> + +<h2><a name="9-1"></a><a href="#TOC">THE FACT OF SEX</a></h2> + +<p>It is constantly said that the advocates of woman suffrage ignore the +fact of sex. On the contrary, they seem to me to be the only people who do +not ignore it.</p> + +<p>Were there no such thing as sexual difference, the wrong done to woman +by disfranchisement would be far less. It is precisely because her traits, +habits, needs, and probable demands are distinct from those of man, that +she is not, never was, never can, and never will be, justly represented by +him. It is not merely that a vast number of human individuals are +disfranchised; it is not even because in many of our States the +disfranchisement extends to a majority, that the evil is so great; it is +not merely that we disfranchise so many units and tens: but we exclude a +special element, a peculiar power, a distinct interest,-- in a word, a +sex.</p> + +<p>Whether this sex is more or less wise, more or less important, than the +other sex, does not affect the argument: it is a sex, and, being such, is +more absolutely distinct from the other than is any mere race from any +other race. The more you emphasize the fact of sex, the more you +strengthen our argument. If the white man cannot justly represent the +negro,-- although the two races are now so amalgamated that not even the +microscope can always decide to which race one belongs,--how impossible +that one sex should stand in legislation for the other sex!</p> + +<p>This is so clear that, so soon as it is stated, there is a shifting of +the ground. "But consider the danger of introducing the sexual influence +into legislation!" ... Then we are sure to be confronted with the case of +Miss Vinnie Ream, the sculptor. See how that beguiling damsel cajoled all +Congress into buying poor statues! they say. If one woman could do so +much, how would it be with one hundred? Precisely the Irishman's argument +against the use of pillows: he had put one feather on a rock, and found it +a very uncomfortable support. Grant, for the sake of argument, that Miss +Ream gave us poor art; but what gave her so much power? Plainly that she +was but a single feather. Congress being composed exclusively of men, the +mere fact of her sex gave her an exceptional and dangerous influence. Fill +a dozen of the seats in Congress with women, and that danger at least will +be cancelled. The taste in art may be no better; but an artist will no +more be selected for being a pretty girl than now for being a pretty boy. +So in all such cases. Here, as everywhere, it is the advocate of woman +suffrage who wishes to recognize the fact of sex, and guard against its +perils.</p> + +<p>It is precisely so in education. Believing boys and girls to be unlike, +and yet seeing them to be placed by the Creator on the same planet and in +the same family, we hold it safer to follow his method. As they are born +to interest each other, to stimulate each other, to excite each other, it +seems better to let this impulse work itself off in a natural way,--to let +in upon it the fresh air and the daylight, instead of attempting to +suppress and destroy it. In a mixed school, as in a family, the fact of +sex presents itself as an unconscious, healthy, mutual stimulus. It is in +the separate schools that the healthy relation vanishes, and the thought +of sex becomes a morbid and diseased thing. This observation first +occurred to me when a pupil and a teacher in boys' boarding-schools years +ago: there was such marked superiority as to sexual refinement in the +day-scholars, who saw their sisters and the friends of their sisters every +day. All later experience of our public-school system has confirmed this +opinion. It is because I believe the distinction of sex to be momentous, +that I dread to see the sexes educated apart.</p> + +<p>The truth of the whole matter is that Nature will have her rights-- +innocently if she can, guiltily if she must; and it is a little amusing +that the writer of an ingenious paper on the other side, called "Sex in +Politics," in an able New York journal, puts our case better than I can +put it, before he gets through, only that he is then speaking of wealth, +not women: "Anybody who considers seriously what is meant by the conflict +between labor and capital, of which we are only just witnessing the +beginning, and what is to be done <i>to give money legitimately that +influence on legislation which it now exercises illegitimately,</i> must +acknowledge at once that the next generation will have a thorny path to +travel." The italics are my own. Precisely what this writer wishes to +secure for money, we claim for the disfranchised half of the human race,-- +open instead of secret influence; the English tradition instead of the +French; women as rulers, not as kings' mistresses; women as legislators, +not merely as lobbyists; women employing in legitimate form that power +which they will otherwise illegitimately wield. This is all our +demand.</p> + +<h2><a name="9-2"></a><a href="#TOC">HOW WILL IT RESULT?</a></h2> + +<p>"It would be a great convenience, my hearers," said old Parson +Withington of Newbury, "if the moral of a fable could only be written at +the beginning of it, instead of the end. But it never is." Commonly the +only thing to be done is to get hold of a few general principles, hold to +those, and trust that all will turn out well. No matter how thoroughly a +reform may have been discussed,--negro emancipation or free-trade, for +instance,--it is a step in the dark at last, and the detailed results +never turn out to be precisely according to the programme.</p> + +<p>An "esteemed correspondent," who has written some of the best things +yet said in America in behalf of the enfranchisement of woman, writes +privately to express some solicitude, since, as she thinks, we are not +ready for it yet. "I am convinced," she writes, "of the abstract right of +women to vote; but all I see of the conduct of the existing women, into +whose hands this change would throw the power, inclines me to hope that +this power will not be conceded till education shall have prepared a class +of women fit to take the responsibilities."</p> + +<p>Gradual emancipation, in short!--for fear of trusting truth and justice +to take care of themselves. Who knew, when the negroes were set free, +whether they would at first use their freedom well, or ill? Would they +work? would they avoid crimes? would they justify their freedom? The +theory of education and preparation seemed very plausible. Against that, +there was only the plain theory which Elizabeth Heyrick first announced to +England,--"Immediate, unconditional emancipation." "The best preparation +for freedom is freedom." What was true of the negroes then is true of +women now.</p> + +<p>"The lovelier traits of womanhood," writes earnestly our correspondent, +"simplicity, faith, guilelessness, unfit them to conduct public affairs, +where one must deal with quacks and charlatans.... We are not all at once +'as gods, knowing good and evil;' and the very innocency of our lives, and +the habits of pure homes, unfit us to manage a certain class who will +flock to this standard."</p> + +<p>But the basis of all republican government is in the assumption that +good is ultimately stronger than evil. If we once abandon this, our theory +has gone to pieces, at any rate. If we hold to it, good women are no more +helpless and useless than good men. The argument that would here +disfranchise women has been used before now to disfranchise clergymen. I +believe that in some States they are still disfranchised; and, if they are +not, it is partly because good is found to be as strong as evil, after +all, and partly because clergymen are not found to be so angelically good +as to be useless. I am very confident that both these truths will be found +to apply to women also.</p> + +<p>Whatever else happens, we may be pretty sure that one thing will. The +first step towards the enfranchisement of women will blow to the winds the +tradition of the angelic superiority of women. Just so surely as women +vote, we shall occasionally have women politicians, women corruptionists, +and women demagogues. Conceding, for the sake of courtesy, that none such +now exist, they will be born as inevitably, after enfranchisement, as the +frogs begin to pipe in the spring. Those who doubt it ignore human nature; +and, if they are not prepared for this fact, they had better consider it +in season, and take sides accordingly. In these pages, at least, they have +been warned.</p> + +<p>What then? Suppose women are not "as gods, knowing good and evil:" they +are not to be emancipated as gods, but as fallible human beings. They are +to come out of an ignorant innocence, that may be only weakness, into a +wise innocence that will be strength. It is too late to remand American +women into a Turkish or Jewish tutelage: they have emerged too far not to +come farther. In a certain sense, no doubt, the butterfly is safest in the +chrysalis. When the soft thing begins to emerge, the world certainly seems +a dangerous place; and it is hard to say what will be the result of the +emancipation. But when she is once half out, there is no safety for the +pretty creature but to come the rest of the way, and use her wings.</p> + +<h2><a name="9-3"></a><a href="#TOC">I HAVE ALL THE RIGHTS I WANT</a></h2> + +<p>When Dr. Johnson had published his English Dictionary, and was asked by +a lady how he chanced to make a certain mistake that she pointed out, he +answered, "Ignorance, madam, pure ignorance." I always feel disposed to +make the same comment on the assertion of any woman that she has all the +rights she wants. For every woman is, or may be, or might have been, a +mother. And when she comes to know that even now, in many parts of the +Union, a married mother has no legal right to her child, I should think +her tongue would cleave to her mouth before she would utter those foolish +words again.</p> + +<p>All the things I ever heard or read against slavery did not fix in my +soul such a hostility to it as a single scene in a Missouri slave-jail +many years ago. As I sat there, a purchaser came in to buy a little girl +to wait on his wife. Three little sisters were brought in, from eight to +twelve years old: they were mulattoes, with sweet, gentle manners; they +had evidently been taken good care of, and their pink calico frocks were +clean and whole. The gentleman chose one of them, and then asked her, +good-naturedly enough, if she did not wish to go with him. She burst into +tears, and said, "I want to stay with my mother." But her tears were as +powerless, of course, as so many salt drops from the ocean.</p> + +<p>That was all. But all the horrors of "Uncle Tom's Cabin," the stories +told me by fugitive slaves, the scarred backs I afterwards saw by dozens +among colored recruits, did not impress me as did that hour in the jail. +The whole probable career of that poor, wronged, motherless, shrinking +child passed before me in fancy. It seemed to me that a man must be +utterly lost to all manly instincts who would not give his life to +overthrow such a system. It seemed to me that the woman who could +tolerate, much less defend it, could not herself be true, could not be +pure, or must be fearfully and grossly ignorant.</p> + +<p>You acquiesce, fair lady. You say it was horrible indeed, but, thank +God! it is past. Past? Is it so? Past, if you please, as to the law of +slavery, but as to the legal position of woman still a fearful reality. It +is not many years since a scene took place in a Boston court-room, before +Chief Justice Chapman, which was worse, in this respect, than that scene +in St. Louis, inasmuch as the mother was present when the child was taken +away, and the wrong was sanctioned by the highest judicial officer of the +State. Two little girls, who had been taken from their mother by their +guardian, their father being dead, had taken refuge with her against his +wishes; and he brought them into court under a writ of habeas corpus, and +the court awarded them to him as against their mother. "The little ones +were very much affected," says the "Boston Herald," "by the result of the +decision which separated them from their mother; and force was required to +remove them from the court-room. The distress of the mother was also very +evident."</p> + +<p>There must have been some special reason, you say, for such a seeming +outrage: she was a bad woman. No: she was "a lady of the highest +respectability." No charge was made against her; but, being left a widow, +she had married again; and for that, and that only, so far as appears, the +court took from her the guardianship of her own children,--bone of her +bone, and flesh of her flesh, the children for whom she had borne the +deepest physical agony of womanhood,--and awarded them to somebody else. +You say, "But her second husband might have misused the children." Might? +So the guardian might, and that where they had no mother to protect them. +Had the father been left a widower, he might have made a half-dozen +successive marriages, have brought stepmother after stepmother to control +these children, and no court could have interfered. The father is +recognized before the law as the natural guardian of the children. The +mother, even though she be left a widow, is not. The consequence is a +series of outrages of which only a few scattered instances come before the +public; just as in slavery, out of a hundred little girls sold away from +their parents, only one case might ever be mentioned in any newspaper.</p> + +<p>This case led to an alteration of the law in Massachusetts, but the +same thing might yet happen in some States of the Union. The possibility +of a single such occurrence shows that there is still a fundamental wrong +in the legal position of woman. And the fact that most women do not know +it only deepens the wrong--as Dr. Channing said of the contentment of the +Southern slaves. The mass of men, even of lawyers, pass by such things, as +they formerly passed by the facts of slavery.</p> + +<p>There is no lasting remedy for these wrongs, except to give woman the +political power to protect herself. There never yet existed a race, nor a +class, nor a sex, which was noble enough to be trusted with political +power over another sex, or class, or race. It is for self-defence that +woman needs the ballot. And in view of a single such occurrence as I have +given, I charge that woman who professes to have "all the rights she +wants," either with a want of all feeling of motherhood, or with +"ignorance, madam, pure ignorance."</p> + +<h2><a name="9-4"></a><a href="#TOC">SENSE ENOUGH TO VOTE</a></h2> + +<p>There is one special point on which men seem to me rather insincere +toward women. When they speak to women, the objection made to their voting +is usually that they are too angelic. But when men talk to each other, the +general assumption is, that women should not vote because they have not +brains enough-- or, as old Theophilus Parsons wrote a century ago, have +not "a sufficient acquired discretion."</p> + +<p>It is an important difference. Because, if women are too angelic to +vote, they can only be fitted for it by becoming more wicked, which is not +desirable. On the other hand, if there is no objection but the want of +brains, then our public schools are equalizing that matter fast enough. +Still, there are plenty of people who have never got beyond this +objection. Listen to the first discussion that you encounter among men on +this subject, wherever they may congregate. Does it turn upon the question +of saintliness, or of brains? Let us see.</p> + +<p>I travelled the other day upon the Boston and Providence Railroad with +a party of mechanics, mostly English and Scotch. They were discussing this +very question, and, with the true English habit, thought it was all a +matter of property. Without it a woman certainly should not vote, they +said; but they all favored, to my surprise, the enfranchisement of women +of property. "As a general rule," said the chief speaker, "a woman that's +got property has got sense enough to vote."</p> + +<p>There it was! These foreigners, who had found their own manhood by +coming to a land which not only the Pilgrim Fathers but the Pilgrim +Mothers had settled, and subdued, and freed for them, were still ready to +disfranchise most of the daughters of those mothers, on the ground that +they had not "sense enough to vote." I thanked them for their blunt +truthfulness, so much better than the flattery of most of the +native-born.</p> + +<p>My other instance shall be a conversation overheard in a railway +station near Boston, between two intelligent citizens, who had lately +listened to Anna Dickinson. "The best of it was," said one, "to see our +minister introduce her." "Wonder what the Orthodox churches would have +said to that ten years ago?" said the other. "Never mind," was the answer. +"Things have changed. What I think is, it's all in the bringing up. If +women were brought up just as men are, they'd have just as much brains." +(Brains again!) "That's what Beecher says. Boys are brought up to do +business, and take care of themselves: that's where it is. Girls are +brought up to dress and get married. Start 'em alike! That's what Beecher +says. Start 'em alike, and see if girls haven't got just as much +brains."</p> + +<p>"Still harping on my daughter," and on the condition of her brains! It +is on this that the whole question turns, in the opinion of many men. Ask +ten men their objections to woman suffrage. One will plead that women are +angels. Another fears discord in families. Another points out that women +cannot fight,-- he himself being very likely a non-combatant. Another +quotes St. Paul for this purpose,--not being, perhaps, in the habit of +consulting that authority on any other point. But with the others, very +likely, everything will turn on the question of brains. They believe, or +think they believe, that women have not sense enough to vote. They may not +say so to women, but they habitually say it to men. If you wish to meet +the common point of view of masculine voters, you must find it here.</p> + +<p>It is fortunate that it is so. Of all points, this is the easiest to +settle; for every intelligent woman, even if she be opposed to woman +suffrage, helps to settle it. Every good lecture by a woman, every good +book written by one, every successful business enterprise carried on, +helps to decide the question. Every class of girls that graduates from +every good school helps to pile up the argument on this point. And the +vast army of women, constituting nine out of ten of the teachers in our +American schools, may appeal as logically to their pupils, and settle the +argument based on brains. "If we had sense enough to educate you," they +may say to each graduating class of boys, "we have sense enough to vote +beside you."</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>"The ladies actively working to secure the cooperation of their sex in +caucuses and citizens' conventions are not actuated by love of notoriety, +and are not, therefore, to be classed with the absolute woman +suffragists."--Boston Daily Transcript, Sept. 1, 1879.</p> +</blockquote> + +<h2><a name="9-5"></a><a href="#TOC">AN INFELICITOUS EPITHET</a></h2> + +<p>When the eloquent colored abolitionist, Charles Remond, once said upon +the platform that George Washington, having been a slaveholder, was a +villain, Wendell Phillips remonstrated by saying, "Charles, the epithet is +not felicitous." Reformers are apt to be pelted with epithets quite as +ill-chosen. How often has the charge figured in history, that they were +"actuated by love of notoriety"! The early Christians, it was generally +believed, took a positive pleasure in being thrown to the lions, under the +influence of this motive; and at a later period there was a firm +conviction that the Huguenots consented readily to being broken on the +wheel, or sawed in pieces between two boards, and felt amply rewarded by +the pleasure of being talked about. During the whole anti-slavery +movement, while the abolitionists were mobbed, fined, and +imprisoned,--while they were tabooed by good society, depleted of their +money, kept out of employment, by the mere fact of their +abolitionism,--there never was a moment when their motive was not +considered by many persons to be the love of notoriety. Why should the +advocates of woman suffrage expect any different treatment now?</p> + +<p>It is not necessary, in order to dispose of this charge, to claim that +all reformers are heroes or saints. Even in the infancy of any reform, it +takes along with it some poor material; and unpleasant traits are often +developed by the incidents of the contest. Doubtless many reformers attain +to a certain enjoyment of a fight, at last: it is one of the dangerous +tendencies which those committed to this vocation must resist. But, so far +as my observation goes, those who engage in reform for the sake of +notoriety generally hurt the reform so much that they render it their +chief service when they leave it; and this happy desertion usually comes +pretty early in their career. The besetting sin of reformers is not, so +far as I can judge, the love of notoriety, but the fate of power and of +flattery within their own small circle,--a temptation quite different from +the other, both in its origin and its results.</p> + +<p>Notoriety comes so soon to a reformer that its charms, whatever they +may be, soon pall upon the palate, just as they do in case of a popular +poet or orator, who is so used to seeing himself in print that he hardly +notices it. I suppose there is no young person so modest that he does not, +on first seeing his name in a newspaper, cut out the passage with a +certain tender solicitude, and perhaps purchase a few extra copies of the +fortunate journal. But when the same person has been battered by a score +or two of years in successive unpopular reforms, I suppose that he not +only would leave the paper uncut or unpurchased, but would hardly take the +pains even to correct a misstatement, were it asserted that he had +inherited a fortune or murdered his grandmother. The moral is that the +love of notoriety is soon amply filled, in a reformer's experience, and +that he will not, as a rule, sacrifice home and comfort, money and +friends, without some stronger inducement. This is certainly true of most +of the men who have interested themselves in this particular movement, the +"weak-minded men," as the reporters, with witty antithesis, still describe +them; and it must be much the same with the "strong-minded women" who +share their base career.</p> + +<p>And it is to be remembered, above all, that, considered as an engine +for obtaining notoriety, the woman-suffrage agitation is a great waste of +energy. The same net result could have been won with far less expenditure +in other ways. There is not a woman connected with it who could not have +achieved far more real publicity as a manager of charity fairs or as a +sensation letter-writer. She could have done this, too, with far less +trouble, without the loss of a single genteel friend, without forfeiting a +single social attention, without having a single ill-natured thing said +about her--except perhaps that she bored people, a charge to which the +highest and lowest forms of prominence are equally open. Nay, she might +have done even more than this, if notoriety was her sole aim: for she +might have become a "variety" minstrel or a female pedestrian; she might +have written a scandalous novel; she might have got somebody to aim at her +that harmless pistol, which has helped the fame of so many a wandering +actress, while its bullet somehow never hits anything but the wall. All +this she might have done, and obtained a notoriety beyond doubt. Instead +of this, she has preferred to prowl about, picking up a precarious +publicity by giving lectures to willing lyceums, writing books for eager +publishers, organizing schools, setting up hospitals, and achieving for +her sex something like equal rights before the law. Either she has shown +herself, as a seeker after notoriety, to be a most foolish or ill-judging +person,-- or else, as was said of Washington's being a villain, "the +epithet is not felicitous."</p> + +<h2><a name="9-6"></a><a href="#TOC">THE ROB ROY THEORY</a></h2> + +<p>"The Saturday Review," in an article which denounces all equality in +marriage laws and all plans of woman suffrage, admits frankly the +practical obstacles in the way of the process of voting. "Possibly the +presence of women as voters would tend still further to promote order than +has been done by the ballot." It plants itself wholly on one objection, +which goes far deeper, thus:--</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>"If men choose to say that women are not their equals, women have +nothing to do but to give in. Physical force, the ultimate basis of all +society and all government, must be on the side of the men; and those who +have the key of the position will not consent permanently to abandon +it."</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>It is a great pleasure when an opponent of justice is willing to fall +back thus frankly upon the Rob Roy theory:--</p> + +<blockquote> +<p> "The good old rule<br> + Sufficeth him, the simple plan<br> +That they should take who have the power,<br> + And they should keep who can."</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>It is easy, I think, to show that the theory is utterly false, and that +the basis of civilized society is not physical force, but, on the +contrary, brains.</p> + +<p>In the city where the "Saturday Review" is published, there are three +regiments of "Guards" which are the boast of the English army, and are +believed by their officers to be the finest troops in the world. They have +deteriorated in size since the Crimean war; but I believe that the men of +one regiment still average six feet two inches in height; and I am sure +that nobody ever saw them in line without noticing the contrast between +these magnificent men and the comparatively puny officers who command +them. These officers are from the highest social rank in England, the +governing classes; and if it were the whole object of this military +organization to give a visible proof of the utter absurdity of the +"Saturday Review's" theory, it could not be better done. There is no +country in Europe, I suppose, where the hereditary aristocracy is +physically equal to that of England, or where the intellectual class has +so good a physique. But set either the House of Lords or the "Saturday +Review" contributors upon a hand-to-hand fight against an equal number of +"navvies" or "coster-mongers," and the patricians would have about as much +chance as a crew of Vassar girls in a boat-race with Yale or Harvard. Take +the men of England alone, and it is hardly too much to say that physical +force, instead of being the basis of political power in any class, is apt +to be found in inverse ratio to it. In case of revolution, the strength of +the governing class in any country is not in its physical, but in its +mental power. Rank and money, and the power to influence and organize and +command, are merely different modifications of mental training, brought to +bear by somebody.</p> + +<p>In our country, without class distinctions, the same truth can be +easily shown. Physical power lies mainly in the hands of the masses: +wherever a class or profession possesses more than its numerical share of +power, it has usually less than its proportion of physical vigor. This is +easily shown from the vast body of evidence collected during our civil +war. In the volume containing the medical statistics of the Provost +Marshal General's Bureau, we have the tabulated reports of about 600,000 +persons subject to draft, and of about 500,000 recruits, substitutes, and +drafted men; showing the precise physical condition of more than a million +men.</p> + +<p>It appears that, out of the whole number examined, rather more than 257 +in each 1000 were found unfit for military service. It is curious to see +how generally the physical power among these men is in inverse ratio to +the social and political prominence of the class they represent. Out of +1000 unskilled laborers, for instance, only 348 are physically +disqualified; among tanners, only 216; among iron-workers, 189. On the +other hand, among lawyers, 544 out of 1000 are disqualified; among +journalists, 740; among clergymen, 954. Grave divines are horrified at the +thought of admitting women to vote, since they cannot fight; though not +one in twenty of their own number is fit for military duty, if he +volunteered. Of the editors who denounce woman suffrage, only about one in +four could himself carry a musket; while of the lawyers who fill Congress, +the majority could not be defenders of their country, but could only be +defended. If we were to distribute political power with reference to the +"physical basis" which the "Saturday Review" talks about, it would be a +wholly new distribution, and would put things more hopelessly upside down +than did the worst phase of the French Commune. If, then, a political +theory so utterly breaks down when applied to men, why should we insist on +resuscitating it in order to apply it to women? The truth is that as +civilization advances the world is governed more and more unequivocally by +brains; and whether those brains are deposited in a strong body or a weak +one becomes a matter of less and less importance. But it is only in the +very first stage of barbarism that mere physical strength makes mastery; +and the long head has controlled the long arm since the beginning of +recorded time.</p> + +<p>And it must be remembered that even these statistics very imperfectly +represent the case. They do not apply to the whole male sex, but actually +to the picked portion only, to the men presumed to be of military age, +excluding the very old and the very young. Were these included, the +proportion unfit for military duty would of course be far greater. +Moreover, it takes no account of courage or cowardice, patriotism or zeal. +How much all these considerations tell upon the actual proportion may be +seen from the fact that in the town where I am writing, for instance, out +of some twelve thousand inhabitants and about three thousand voters, there +are only some three hundred who actually served in the civil war,--a +number too small to exert a perceptible influence on any local election. +When we see the community yielding up its voting power into the hands of +those who have actually done military service, it will be time enough to +exclude women for not doing such service. If the alleged physical basis +operates as an exclusion of all non-combatants, it should surely give a +monopoly to the actual combatants.</p> + +<h2><a name="9-7"></a><a href="#TOC">THE VOTES OF NON-COMBATANTS</a></h2> + +<p>The tendency of modern society is not to concentrate power in the hands +of the few, but to give a greater and greater share to the many. Read +Froissart's Chronicles, and Scott's novels of chivalry, and you will see +how thoroughly the difference between patrician and plebeian was then a +difference of physical strength. The knight, being better nourished and +better trained, was apt to be the bodily superior of the peasant, to begin +with; and this strength was reinforced by armor, weapons, horse, castle, +and all the resources of feudal warfare. With this greater strength went +naturally the assumption of greater political power. To the heroes of +"Ivanhoe," or "The Fair Maid of Perth," it would have seemed as absurd +that yeomen and lackeys should have any share in the government, as it +would seem to the members in an American legislature that women should +have any such share. In a contest of mailed knights, any number of unarmed +men were but so many women. As Sir Philip Sidney said, "The wolf asketh +not how many the sheep may be."</p> + +<p>But time and advancing civilization have tended steadily in one +direction. "He giveth power to the weak, and to them who have no might He +increaseth strength." Every step in the extension of political rights has +consisted in opening them to a class hitherto humbler. From kings to +nobles, from nobles to burghers, from burghers to yeomen; in short, from +strong to weak, from high to low, from rich to poor. All this is but the +unconscious following out of one sure principle,--that legislation is +mainly for the protection of the weak against the strong, and that for +this purpose the weak must be directly represented. The strong are already +protected by their strength: it is the weak who need all the +vantage-ground that votes and legislatures can give them. The feudal +chiefs were stronger without laws than with them. "Take care of yourselves +in Sutherland," was the anxious message of the old Highlander: "the law +has come as far as Tain." It was the peaceful citizen who needed the +guaranty of law against brute force.</p> + +<p>But can laws be executed without brute force? Not without a certain +amount of it, but that amount under civilization grows less and less. Just +in proportion as the masses are enfranchised, statutes execute themselves +without crossing bayonets. "In a republic," said De Tocqueville, "if laws +are not always respectable, they are always respected." If every step in +freedom has brought about a more peaceable state of society, why should +that process stop at this precise point? Besides, there is no possibility +in nature of a political division in which all the men shall be on one +side and all the women on the other. The mutual influence of the sexes +forbids it. The very persons who hint at such a fear refute themselves at +other times, by arguing that "women will always be sufficiently +represented by men," or that "every woman will vote as her husband thinks, +and it will merely double the numbers." As a matter of fact, the law will +prevail in all English-speaking nations: a few men fighting for it will be +stronger than many fighting against it; and if those few have both the law +and the women on their side, there will be no trouble.</p> + +<p>The truth is that in this age <i>cedant arma togae:</i> it is the +civilian who rules on the throne or behind it, and who makes the +fighting-men his mere agents. Yonder policeman at the corner looks big and +formidable: he protects the women and overawes the boys. But away in some +corner of the City Hill there is some quiet man, out of uniform, perhaps a +consumptive or a dyspeptic or a cripple, who can overawe the burliest +policeman by his authority as city marshal or as mayor. So an army is but +a larger police; and its official head is that plain man at the White +House, who makes or unmakes, not merely brevet- brigadiers, but +major-generals in command,--who can by the stroke of the pen convert the +most powerful man of the army into the most powerless. Take away the +occupant of the position, and put in a woman, and will she become impotent +because her name is Elizabeth or Maria Theresa? It is brains that more and +more govern the world; and whether those brains be on the throne, or at +the ballot- box, they will soon make the owner's sex a subordinate affair. +If woman is also strong in the affections, so much the better. "Win the +hearts of your subjects," said Lord Burleigh to Queen Elizabeth, "and you +will have their hands and purses."</p> + +<p>War is the last appeal, and happily in these days the rarest appeal, of +statesmanship. In the multifarious other duties that make up statesmanship +we cannot spare the brains, the self-devotion, and the enthusiasm of +woman. One of the most important treaties of modern history, the peace of +Cambray, in 1529, was negotiated, after previous attempts had failed, by +two women,--Margaret, aunt of Charles V., and Louisa, mother of Francis I. +Voltaire said that Christina of Sweden was the only sovereign of her time +who maintained the dignity of the throne against Mazarin and Richelieu. +Frederick the Great said that the Seven Years' War was waged against three +women,--Elizabeth of Russia, Maria Theresa, and Mme. Pompadour. There is +nothing impotent in the statesmanship of women when they are admitted to +exercise it: they are only powerless for good when they are obliged to +obtain by wheedling and flattery a sway that should be recognized, +responsible, and limited.</p> + +<h2><a name="9-8"></a><a href="#TOC">MANNERS REPEAL LAWS</a></h2> + +<p>There is in Boswell's "Life of Johnson" a correspondence which is well +worth reading by both advocates and opponents of woman suffrage. Boswell, +who was of an old Scotch family, had a difference of opinion with his +father about an entailed estate which had descended to them. Boswell +wished the title so adjusted as to cut off all possibility of female +heirship. His father, on the other hand, wished to recognize such a +contingency. Boswell wrote to Johnson in 1776 for advice, urging a series +of objections, physiological and moral, to the inheritance of a family +estate by a woman; though, as he magnanimously admits, "they should be +treated with great affection and tenderness, and always participate of the +prosperity of the family."</p> + +<p>Dr. Johnson, for a wonder, took the other side, defended female +heirship, and finally summed up thus: "It cannot but occur that women have +natural and equitable claims as well as men, and these claims are not to +be capriciously or lightly superseded or infringed. When fiefs inspired +military service, it is easily discerned why females could not inherit +them; but the reason is at an end. <i>As manners make laws, so manners +likewise repeal them</i>."</p> + +<p>This admirable statement should be carefully pondered by those who hold +that suffrage should be only coextensive with military duty. The position +that woman cannot properly vote because she cannot fight for her vote +efficiently is precisely like the position of feudalism and of Boswell, +that she could not properly hold real estate because she could not fight +for it. Each position may have had some plausibility in its day, but the +same current of events has made each obsolete. Those who in these days +believe in giving woman the ballot argue precisely as Dr. Johnson did in +1776. Times have changed, manners have softened, education has advanced, +public opinion now acts more forcibly; and the reference to physical +force, though still implied, is implied more and more remotely. The +political event of the age, the overthrow of American slavery, would not +have been accomplished without the "secular arm" of Grant and Sherman, let +us agree: but neither would it have been accomplished without the moral +power of Garrison the non-resistant, and Harriet Beecher Stowe the woman. +When the work is done, it is unfair to disfranchise any of the +participants. Dr. Johnson was right: "When fiefs [or votes] implied +military service, it is easily discerned why women should not inherit [or +possess] them; but the reason is at an end. As manners make laws, so +manners likewise repeal them."</p> + +<p>Under the feudal system it would have been absurd that women should +hold real estate, for the next armed warrior could dispossess her. By Gail +Hamilton's reasoning, it is equally absurd now: "One man is stronger than +one woman, and ten men are stronger than ten women; and the nineteen +millions of men in this country will subdue, capture, and execute or expel +the nineteen millions of women just as soon as they set about it." Very +well: why, then, do not all the landless men in a town unite, and take +away the landed property of all the women? Simply because we now live in +civilized society and under a reign of law; because those men's respect +for law is greater than their appetite for property; or, if you prefer, +because even those landless men know that their own interest lies, in the +long-run, on the side of law. It will be precisely the same with voting. +When any community is civilized up to the point of enfranchising women, it +will be civilized up to the point of sustaining their vote, as it now +sustains their property rights, by the whole material force of the +community. When the thing is once established, it will no more occur to +anybody that a woman's vote is powerless because she cannot fight, than it +now occurs to anybody that her title to real estate is invalidated by the +same circumstance.</p> + +<p>Woman is in the world; she cannot be got rid of: she must be a serf or +an equal; there is no middle ground. We have outgrown the theory of +serfdom in a thousand ways, and may as well abandon the whole. Women have +now a place in society: their influence will be exerted, at any rate, in +war and in peace, legally or illegally; and it had better be exerted in +direct, legitimate, and responsible methods, than in ways that are dark, +and by tricks that have not even the merit of being plain.</p> + +<h2><a name="9-9"></a><a href="#TOC">DANGEROUS VOTERS</a></h2> + +<p>One of the few plausible objections brought against women's voting is +this: that it would demoralize the suffrage by letting in very dangerous +voters; that virtuous women would not vote, and vicious women would. It is +a very unfounded alarm.</p> + +<p>For, in the first place, our institutions rest--if they have any basis +at all--on this principle, that good is stronger than evil, that the +majority of men really wish to vote rightly, and that only time and +patience are needed to get the worst abuses righted. How any one can doubt +this, who watches the course of our politics, I do not see. In spite of +the great disadvantage of having masses of ignorant foreign voters to deal +with,--and of native black voters, who have been purposely kept in +ignorance,--we certainly see wrongs gradually righted, and the truth by +degrees prevail. Even the one great, exceptional case of New York city has +been reached at last; and the very extent of the evil has brought its own +cure. Now, why should this triumph of good over evil be practicable among +men, and not apply to women also?</p> + +<p>It must be either because women, as a class, are worse than men,--which +will hardly be asserted,--or because, for some special reason, bad women +have an advantage over good women such as has no parallel in the other +sex. But I do not see how this can be. Let us consider.</p> + +<p>It is certain that good women are not less faithful and conscientious +than good men. It is generally admitted that those most opposed to +suffrage will very soon, on being fully enfranchised, feel it their duty +to vote. They may at first misuse the right through ignorance, but they +certainly will not shirk it. It is this conscientious habit on which I +rely without fear. Never yet, when public duty required, have American +women failed to meet the emergency; and I am not afraid of it now. +Moreover, when they are once enfranchised and their votes are needed, all +the men who now oppose or ridicule the demand for suffrage will begin to +help them to exercise it. When the wives are once enfranchised, you may be +sure that the husbands will not neglect those of their own household: they +will provide them with ballots, vehicles, and policemen, and will contrive +to make the voting-places pleasanter than many parlors, and quieter than +some churches.</p> + +<p>On the other hand, it seems altogether probable that the very worst +women, so far from being ostentatious in their wickedness upon election +day, will, on the contrary, so disguise and conceal themselves as to +deceive the very elect, and, if it were possible, the very policemen. For +whatever party they may vote, they will contribute to make the +voting-places as orderly as railway stations. These covert ways are the +very habit of their lives, at least by daylight; and the women who have of +late done the most conspicuous and open mischief in our community have +done it, not in their true character as evil, but, on the contrary, under +a mask of elevated purpose.</p> + +<p>That women, when they vote, will commit their full share of errors I +have always maintained. But that they will collectively misuse their power +seems to me out of the question; and that the good women are going to stay +at home, and let bad women do the voting, appears quite as incredible. In +fact, if they do thus, it is a fair question whether the epithets "good" +and "bad" ought not, politically speaking, to change places. For it +naturally occurs to every one, on election day, that the man who votes, +even if he votes wrong, is really a better man, so far as political duties +go, than the very loftiest saint who stays at home and prays that other +people may vote right And it is hard to see why it should be otherwise +with women.</p> + +<h2><a name="9-10"></a><a href="#TOC">HOW WOMEN WILL LEGISLATE</a></h2> + +<p>It is often said that when women vote their votes will make no +difference in the count, became they will merely duplicate the votes of +their husbands and brothers. Then these same objectors go on and predict +all sorts of evil things for which women will vote quite apart from their +husbands and brothers. Moreover, the evils thus predicted are apt to be +diametrically opposite. Thus Goldwin Smith predicts that women will be +governed by priests, and then goes on to predict that women will vote to +abolish marriage; not seeing that these two predictions destroy each +other.</p> + +<p>On the other hand, I think that the advocates of woman suffrage often +err by claiming too much,--as that all women will vote for peace, for +total abstinence, against slavery, and the rest. It seems better to rest +the argument on general principles, and not to seek to prophesy too +closely. The only thing which I feel safe in predicting is that woman +suffrage will be used, as it should be, for the protection of woman. +Self-respect and self-protection,--these are, as has been already said, +the two great things for which woman needs the ballot.</p> + +<p>It is not in the nature of things, I take it, that a class politically +subject can obtain justice from the governing class. Not the least of the +benefits gained by political equality for the colored people of the South +is that the laws now generally make no difference of color in penalties +for crime. In slavery times there were dozens of crimes which were +punished more severely by the statute if committed by a slave or a free +negro than if done by a white. I feel very sure that under the reign of +impartial suffrage we should see fewer such announcements as this, which I +cut from a late New York "Evening Express:"--</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>"Last night Capt. Lowery, of the Twenty-seventh Precinct, made a +descent upon the dance-house in the basement of 96 Greenwich Street, and +arrested fifty-two men and eight women. The entire batch was brought +before Justice Flammer, at the Tombs Police Court, this morning. Louise +Maud, the proprietoress, was held in five hundred dollars bail to answer +at the Court of General Sessions. <i>The fifty-two men were fined three +dollars each, all but twelve paying at once; and the eight women were +fined ten dollars each, and sent to the Island for one month."</i></p> +</blockquote> + +<p>The italics are my own. When we reflect that this dance-house, whatever +it was, was unquestionably sustained for the gratification of men, rather +than of women; when we consider that every one of these fifty-two men came +there, in all probability, by his own free will, and to spend money, not +to earn it; and that probably a majority of the women were driven there by +necessity or betrayal, or force or despair,--it would seem that even an +equal punishment would have been cruel injustice to the women. But when we +observe how trifling a penalty was three dollars each to these men, whose +money was likely to go for riotous living in some form, and forty of whom +had the amount of the fine in their pockets; and how hopelessly large an +amount was ten dollars each to women who did not, probably, own even the +clothes they wore, and who were to be sent to prison for a month in +addition,--we see a kind of injustice which would stand a fair chance of +being righted, I suspect, if women came into power. Not that they would +punish their own sex less severely; probably they would not: but they +would put men more on a level as to the penalty.</p> + +<p>It may be said that no such justice is to be expected from women; +because women in what is called "society" condemn women for mere +imprudence, and excuse men for guilt. But it must be remembered that in +"society" guilt is rarely a matter of open proof and conviction, in case +of men: it is usually a matter of surmise; and it is easy for either love +or ambition to set the surmise aside, and to assume that the worst +reprobate is "only a little wild." In fact, as Margaret Fuller pointed out +years ago, how little conception has a virtuous woman as to what a +dissipated young man really is! But let that same woman be a Portia, in +the judgment-seat, or even a legislator or a voter, and let her have the +unmistakable and actual offender before her, and I do not believe that she +will excuse him for a paltry fine, and give the less guilty woman a +penalty more than quadruple.</p> + +<p>Women will also be sure to bring special sympathy and intelligent +attention to the wrongs of children. Who can read without shame and +indignation this report from "The New York Herald"?</p> + +<blockquote> +<p align="center">THE CHILD-SELLING CASE.</p> + +<p>Peter Hallock, committed on a charge of abducting Lena Dinser, a young +girl thirteen years old, whom, it was alleged, her father, George Dinser, +had sold to Hallock for purposes of prostitution, was again brought +yesterday before Judge Westbrook in the Supreme Court Chambers, on the +writ of habeas corpus previously obtained by Mr. William F. Howe, the +prisoner's counsel. Mr. Howe claimed that Hallock could not be held on +either section of the statute for abduction. Under the first section the +complaint, he insisted, should set forth that the child was taken contrary +to the wish and against the consent of her parents. On the contrary, the +evidence, he urged, showed that the father was a willing party. Under the +second section, it was contended that the prisoner could not be held, as +there was no averment that the girl was of previous chaste character. +Judge Westbrook, a brief counter argument having been made by Mr. Dana, +held that the points of Mr. Howe were well taken, and ordered the +prisoner's discharge.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>Here was a father who, as the newspapers allege, had previously sold +two other daughters, body and soul, and against whom the evidence seemed +to be in this case clear. Yet through the defectiveness of the statute, or +the remissness of the prosecuting attorney, he goes free, without even a +trial, to carry on his infamous traffic for other children. Grant that the +points were technically well taken and irresistible,--though this is by no +means certain,--it is very sure that there should be laws that should +reach such atrocities with punishment, whether the father does or does not +consent to his child's ruin; and that public sentiment should compel +prosecuting officers to be as careful in framing their indictments where +human souls are at stake as where the question is of dollars only. It is +upon such matters that the influence of women will make itself felt in +legislation.</p> + +<h2><a name="9-11"></a><a href="#TOC">INDIVIDUALS <i>vs.</i> +CLASSES</a></h2> + +<p>As the older arguments against woman suffrage are abandoned, we hear +more and more of the final objection, that the majority of women have not +yet expressed themselves on the subject. It is common for such reasoners +to make the remark, that if they knew a given number of women--say fifty, +or a hundred, or five hundred--who honestly wished to vote, they would +favor it. Produce that number of unimpeachable names, and they say that +they have reconsidered the matter, and must demand more,--perhaps ten +thousand. Bring ten thousand, and the demand again rises. "Prove that the +majority of women wish to vote, and they shall vote." "Precisely," we say: +"give us a chance to prove it by taking a vote;" and they answer, "By no +means."</p> + +<p>And, in a certain sense, they are right. It ought not to be settled +that way,--by dealing with woman as a class, and taking the vote. The +agitators do not merely claim the right of suffrage for her as a class: +they claim it for each individual woman, without reference to any other. +If there is only one woman in the nation who claims the right to vote, she +ought to have it. In Oriental countries all legislation is for classes, +and in England it is still mainly so. A man is expected to remain in the +station in which he is born; or, if he leaves it, it is by a distinct +process, and he comes under the influence, in various ways, of different +laws. If the iniquities of the "Contagious Diseases" act in England, for +instance, had not been confined in their legal application to the lower +social grades, the act would never have passed. It was easy for men of the +higher classes to legislate away the modesty of women of the lower +classes; but if the daughter of an earl could have been arrested, and +submitted to a surgical examination at the will of any policeman, as the +daughter of a mechanic might be, the law would not have stood a day. So, +through all our slave States, there was class legislation for every person +of negro blood: the laws of crime, of punishment, of testimony, were all +adapted to classes, not individuals. Emancipation swept this all away, in +most cases: classes ceased to exist before the law, so far as men at least +were concerned; there were only individuals. The more progress, the less +class in legislation. We claim the application of this principle as +rapidly as possible to women.</p> + +<p>Our community does not refuse permission for women to go unveiled till +it is proved that the majority of women desire it; it does not even ask +that question: if one woman wishes to show her face, it is allowed. If a +woman wishes to travel alone, to walk the streets alone, the police +protects her in that liberty. She is not thrust back into her house with +the reproof, "My dear madam, at this particular moment the overwhelming +majority of women are indoors: prove that they all wish to come out, and +you shall come." On the contrary, she comes forth at her own sweet will: +the policeman helps her tenderly across the street, and waves back with +imperial gesture the obtrusive coal-cart. Some of us claim for each +individual woman, in the same way, not merely the right to go shopping, +but to go voting; not merely to show her face, but to show her hand.</p> + +<p>There will always be many women, as there are many men, who are +indifferent to voting. For a time, perhaps always, there will be a larger +percentage of this indifference among women. But the natural right to a +share in the government under which one lives, and to a voice in making +the laws under which one may be hanged,--this belongs to each woman as an +individual; and she is quite right to claim it as she needs it, even +though the majority of her sex still prefer to take their chance of the +penalty, without perplexing themselves about the law. The demand of every +enlightened woman who asks for the ballot--like the demand of every +enlightened slave for freedom--is an individual demand; and the question +whether they represent the majority of their class has nothing to do with +it. For a republic like ours does not profess to deal with classes, but +with individuals; since "the whole people covenants with each citizen, and +each citizen with the whole people, for the common good," as the +constitution of Massachusetts says.</p> + +<p>And, fortunately, there is such power in an individual demand that it +appeals to thousands whom no abstract right touches. Five minutes with +Frederick Douglass settled the question, for any thoughtful person, of +that man's right to freedom. Let any woman of position desire to enter +what is called "the lecture- field," to support herself and her children, +and at once all abstract objections to women's speaking in public +disappear: her friends may be never so hostile to "the cause," but they +espouse her individual cause; the most conservative clergyman subscribes +for tickets, but begs that his name may not be mentioned. They do not +admit that women, as a class, should speak,--not they; but for this +individual woman they throng the hall. Mrs. Dahlgren abhors politics: a +woman in Congress, a woman in the committee-room,--what can be more +objectionable? But I observe that when Mrs. Dahlgren wishes to obtain more +profit by her husband's inventions all objections vanish: she can appeal +to Congressmen, she can address committees, she can, I hope, prevail. The +individual ranks first in our sympathy: we do not wait to take the census +of the "class." Make way for the individual, whether it be Mrs. Dahlgren +pleading for the rights of property, or Lucy Stone pleading for the rights +of the mother to her child.</p> + +<h2><a name="9-12"></a><a href="#TOC">DEFEATS BEFORE VICTORIES</a></h2> + +<p>After one of the early defeats in the War of the Rebellion, the +commander of a Massachusetts regiment wrote home to his father: "I wish +people would not write us so many letters of condolence. Our defeat seemed +to trouble them much more than it troubles us. Did people suppose there +were to be no ups and downs? We expect to lose plenty of battles, but we +have enlisted for the war."</p> + +<p>It is just so with every successful reform. While enemies and +half-friends are proclaiming its defeats, those who advocate it are +rejoicing that they have at last got an army into the field to be +defeated. Unless this war is to be an exception to all others, even the +fact of having joined battle is a great deal. It is the first step. Defeat +first; a good many defeats, if you please: victory by and by.</p> + +<p>William Wilberforce, writing to a friend in the year 1817, said, "I +continue faithful to the measure of Parliamentary reform brought forward +by Mr. Pitt. I am firmly persuaded that at present a prodigious majority +of the people of this country are adverse to the measure. In my view, so +far from being an objection to the discussion, this is rather a +recommendation." In 1832 the reform bill was passed.</p> + +<p>In the first Parliamentary debate on the slave trade, Colonel Tarleton, +who boasted to have killed more men than any one in England, pointing to +Wilberforce and others, said, "The inspiration began on that side of the +house;" then turning round, "The revolution has reached to this also, and +reached to the height of fanaticism and frenzy." The first vote in the +House of Commons, in 1790, after arguments in the affirmative by +Wilberforce, Pitt, Fox, and Burke, stood, ayes, 88; noes, 163: majority +against the measure, 75. In 1807 the slave trade was abolished, and in +1834 slavery in the British colonies followed; and even on the very night +when the latter bill passed, the abolitionists were taunted by Gladstone, +the great Demerara slaveholder, with having toiled for forty years and +done nothing. The Roman Catholic relief bill, establishing freedom of +thought in England, had the same experience. It passed in 1829 by a +majority of a hundred and three in the House of Lords, which had nine +months before refused by a majority of forty-five to take up the question +at all.</p> + +<p>The English corn laws went down a quarter of a century ago, after a +similar career of failures. In 1840 there were hundreds of thousands in +England who thought that to attack the corn laws was to attack the very +foundations of society. Lord Melbourne, the prime minister, said in +Parliament, that "he had heard of many mad things in his life, but, before +God, the idea of repealing the corn laws was the very maddest thing of +which he had ever heard." Lord John Russell counselled the House to refuse +to hear evidence on the operation of the corn laws. Six years after, in +1846, they were abolished forever.</p> + +<p>How Wendell Phillips, in the anti-slavery meetings, used to lash +pro-slavery men with such formidable facts as these,--and to quote how +Clay and Calhoun and Webster and Everett had pledged themselves that +slavery should never be discussed, or had proposed that those who +discussed it should be imprisoned,-- while, in spite of them all, the +great reform was moving on, and the abolitionists were forcing politicians +and people to talk, like Sterne's starling, nothing but slavery!</p> + +<p>We who were trained in the light of these great agitations have learned +their lesson. We expect to march through a series of defeats to victory. +The first thing is, as in the anti-slavery movement, so to arouse the +public mind as to make this the central question. Given this prominence, +and it is enough for this year or for many years to come. Wellington said +that there was no such tragedy as a victory, except a defeat. On the other +hand, the next best thing to a victory is a defeat, for it shows that the +armies are in the field. Without the unsuccessful attempt of to-day, no +success to-morrow.</p> + +<p>When Mrs. Frances Anne Kemble came to this country, she was amazed to +find Americans celebrating the battle of Bunker Hill, which she had always +heard claimed as a victory for King George. Such it was doubtless called; +but what we celebrated was the fact that the Americans there threw up +breastworks, stood their ground, fired away their ammunition,--and were +defeated. Thus the reformer, too, looking at his failures, often sees in +them such a step forward, that they are the Bunker Hill of a new +revolution. Give us plenty of such defeats, and we can afford to wait a +score of years for the victories. They will come.</p> +<br> +<br> +<hr class="full" noshade> +<p>***END OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK WOMEN AND THE ALPHABET***</p> +<p>******* This file should be named 13474-h.txt or 13474-h.zip *******</p> +<p>This and all associated files of various formats will be found in:<br /> +<a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/1/3/4/7/13474">https://www.gutenberg.org/1/3/4/7/13474</a></p> +<p>Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions +will be renamed.</p> + +<p>Creating the works from public domain print editions means that no +one owns a United States copyright in these works, so the Foundation +(and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United States without +permission and without paying copyright royalties. Special rules, +set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license, apply to +copying and distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works to +protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm concept and trademark. Project +Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if you +charge for the eBooks, unless you receive specific permission. If you +do not charge anything for copies of this eBook, complying with the +rules is very easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose +such as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and +research. They may be modified and printed and given away--you may do +practically ANYTHING with public domain eBooks. Redistribution is +subject to the trademark license, especially commercial +redistribution.</p> + + + +<pre> +*** START: FULL LICENSE *** + +THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE +PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK + +To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free +distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work +(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project +Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full Project +Gutenberg-tm License (available with this file or online at +<a href="https://gutenberg.org/license">https://gutenberg.org/license)</a>. + + +Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic works + +1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to +and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property +(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all +the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or destroy +all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your possession. +If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the +terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or +entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8. + +1.B. "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark. It may only be +used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who +agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few +things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works +even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See +paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement +and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works. See paragraph 1.E below. + +1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the Foundation" +or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection of Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic works. Nearly all the individual works in the +collection are in the public domain in the United States. If an +individual work is in the public domain in the United States and you are +located in the United States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from +copying, distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative +works based on the work as long as all references to Project Gutenberg +are removed. Of course, we hope that you will support the Project +Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting free access to electronic works by +freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm works in compliance with the terms of +this agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with +the work. You can easily comply with the terms of this agreement by +keeping this work in the same format with its attached full Project +Gutenberg-tm License when you share it without charge with others. + +1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern +what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are in +a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States, check +the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this agreement +before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, distributing or +creating derivative works based on this work or any other Project +Gutenberg-tm work. The Foundation makes no representations concerning +the copyright status of any work in any country outside the United +States. + +1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg: + +1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate +access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear prominently +whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work on which the +phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the phrase "Project +Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed, viewed, +copied or distributed: + +This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with +almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or +re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included +with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org + +1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is derived +from the public domain (does not contain a notice indicating that it is +posted with permission of the copyright holder), the work can be copied +and distributed to anyone in the United States without paying any fees +or charges. If you are redistributing or providing access to a work +with the phrase "Project Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the +work, you must comply either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1 +through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the +Project Gutenberg-tm trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or +1.E.9. + +1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted +with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution +must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any additional +terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms will be linked +to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works posted with the +permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of this work. + +1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm +License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this +work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm. + +1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this +electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without +prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with +active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project +Gutenberg-tm License. + +1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary, +compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including any +word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access to or +distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format other than +"Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official version +posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm web site (www.gutenberg.org), +you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a +copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon +request, of the work in its original "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other +form. Any alternate format must include the full Project Gutenberg-tm +License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1. + +1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying, +performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works +unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9. + +1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing +access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works provided +that + +- You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from + the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method + you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is + owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he + has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the + Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments + must be paid within 60 days following each date on which you + prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your periodic tax + returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked as such and + sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the + address specified in Section 4, "Information about donations to + the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation." + +- You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies + you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he + does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm + License. You must require such a user to return or + destroy all copies of the works possessed in a physical medium + and discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of + Project Gutenberg-tm works. + +- You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any + money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the + electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days + of receipt of the work. + +- You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free + distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works. + +1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set +forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from +both the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and Michael +Hart, the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark. Contact the +Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below. + +1.F. + +1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable +effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread +public domain works in creating the Project Gutenberg-tm +collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may contain +"Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or +corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual +property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other medium, a +computer virus, or computer codes that damage or cannot be read by +your equipment. + +1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right +of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project +Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project +Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all +liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal +fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT +LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE +PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH F3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE +TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE +LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR +INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH +DAMAGE. + +1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a +defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can +receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a +written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you +received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium with +your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you with +the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu of a +refund. If you received the work electronically, the person or entity +providing it to you may choose to give you a second opportunity to +receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If the second copy +is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing without further +opportunities to fix the problem. + +1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth +in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS,' WITH NO OTHER +WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO +WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTIBILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE. + +1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied +warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages. +If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the +law of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be +interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by +the applicable state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any +provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions. + +1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the +trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone +providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in accordance +with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the production, +promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works, +harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees, +that arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do +or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg-tm +work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or deletions to any +Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any Defect you cause. + + +Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm + +Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of +electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of computers +including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It exists +because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations from +people in all walks of life. + +Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the +assistance they need, is critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's +goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will +remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project +Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure +and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future generations. +To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation +and how your efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4 +and the Foundation web page at https://www.pglaf.org. + + +Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive +Foundation + +The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non profit +501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the +state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal +Revenue Service. The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification +number is 64-6221541. Its 501(c)(3) letter is posted at +https://pglaf.org/fundraising. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg +Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent +permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state's laws. + +The Foundation's principal office is located at 4557 Melan Dr. S. +Fairbanks, AK, 99712., but its volunteers and employees are scattered +throughout numerous locations. Its business office is located at +809 North 1500 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887, email +business@pglaf.org. Email contact links and up to date contact +information can be found at the Foundation's web site and official +page at https://pglaf.org + +For additional contact information: + Dr. Gregory B. Newby + Chief Executive and Director + gbnewby@pglaf.org + +Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg +Literary Archive Foundation + +Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without wide +spread public support and donations to carry out its mission of +increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be +freely distributed in machine readable form accessible by the widest +array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations +($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt +status with the IRS. + +The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating +charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United +States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a +considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up +with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations +where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To +SEND DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any +particular state visit https://pglaf.org + +While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we +have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition +against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who +approach us with offers to donate. + +International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make +any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from +outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff. + +Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation +methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other +ways including including checks, online payments and credit card +donations. To donate, please visit: https://pglaf.org/donate + + +Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works. + +Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project Gutenberg-tm +concept of a library of electronic works that could be freely shared +with anyone. For thirty years, he produced and distributed Project +Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer support. + +Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed +editions, all of which are confirmed as Public Domain in the U.S. +unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not necessarily +keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper edition. + +Each eBook is in a subdirectory of the same number as the eBook's +eBook number, often in several formats including plain vanilla ASCII, +compressed (zipped), HTML and others. + +Corrected EDITIONS of our eBooks replace the old file and take over +the old filename and etext number. The replaced older file is renamed. +VERSIONS based on separate sources are treated as new eBooks receiving +new filenames and etext numbers. + +Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search facility: + +<a href="https://www.gutenberg.org">https://www.gutenberg.org</a> + +This Web site includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm, +including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary +Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to +subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks. + +EBooks posted prior to November 2003, with eBook numbers BELOW #10000, +are filed in directories based on their release date. If you want to +download any of these eBooks directly, rather than using the regular +search system you may utilize the following addresses and just +download by the etext year. + +<a href="http://www.ibiblio.org/gutenberg/etext06">http://www.ibiblio.org/gutenberg/etext06</a> + + (Or /etext 05, 04, 03, 02, 01, 00, 99, + 98, 97, 96, 95, 94, 93, 92, 92, 91 or 90) + +EBooks posted since November 2003, with etext numbers OVER #10000, are +filed in a different way. The year of a release date is no longer part +of the directory path. The path is based on the etext number (which is +identical to the filename). The path to the file is made up of single +digits corresponding to all but the last digit in the filename. For +example an eBook of filename 10234 would be found at: + +https://www.gutenberg.org/1/0/2/3/10234 + +or filename 24689 would be found at: +https://www.gutenberg.org/2/4/6/8/24689 + +An alternative method of locating eBooks: +<a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/GUTINDEX.ALL">https://www.gutenberg.org/GUTINDEX.ALL</a> + +*** END: FULL LICENSE *** +</pre> +</body> +</html> |