summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/old/wrcls10.txt
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'old/wrcls10.txt')
-rw-r--r--old/wrcls10.txt3831
1 files changed, 3831 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/old/wrcls10.txt b/old/wrcls10.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..38a4d9e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/old/wrcls10.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,3831 @@
+The Project Gutenberg Etext of War of the Classes by Jack London
+#40 in our series of stories by Jack London
+
+
+Copyright laws are changing all over the world, be sure to check
+the copyright laws for your country before posting these files!!
+
+Please take a look at the important information in this header.
+We encourage you to keep this file on your own disk, keeping an
+electronic path open for the next readers. Do not remove this.
+
+
+**Welcome To The World of Free Plain Vanilla Electronic Texts**
+
+**Etexts Readable By Both Humans and By Computers, Since 1971**
+
+*These Etexts Prepared By Hundreds of Volunteers and Donations*
+
+Information on contacting Project Gutenberg to get Etexts, and
+further information is included below. We need your donations.
+
+
+War of the Classes
+
+by Jack London
+
+January, 1998 [Etext #1187]
+
+
+The Project Gutenberg Etext of War of the Classes by Jack London
+******This file should be named wrcls10.txt or wrcls10.zip******
+
+Corrected EDITIONS of our etexts get a new NUMBER, wrcls11.txt.
+VERSIONS based on separate sources get new LETTER, wrcls10a.txt.
+
+
+This etext was prepared by David Price, email
+ccx074@coventry.ac.uk, from the 1912 Macmillan edition.
+
+Project Gutenberg Etexts are usually created from multiple editions,
+all of which are in the Public Domain in the United States, unless a
+copyright notice is included. Therefore, we do NOT keep these books
+in compliance with any particular paper edition, usually otherwise.
+
+
+We are now trying to release all our books one month in advance
+of the official release dates, for time for better editing.
+
+Please note: neither this list nor its contents are final till
+midnight of the last day of the month of any such announcement.
+The official release date of all Project Gutenberg Etexts is at
+Midnight, Central Time, of the last day of the stated month. A
+preliminary version may often be posted for suggestion, comment
+and editing by those who wish to do so. To be sure you have an
+up to date first edition [xxxxx10x.xxx] please check file sizes
+in the first week of the next month. Since our ftp program has
+a bug in it that scrambles the date [tried to fix and failed] a
+look at the file size will have to do, but we will try to see a
+new copy has at least one byte more or less.
+
+
+Information about Project Gutenberg (one page)
+
+We produce about two million dollars for each hour we work. The
+fifty hours is one conservative estimate for how long it we take
+to get any etext selected, entered, proofread, edited, copyright
+searched and analyzed, the copyright letters written, etc. This
+projected audience is one hundred million readers. If our value
+per text is nominally estimated at one dollar then we produce $2
+million dollars per hour this year as we release thirty-two text
+files per month, or 384 more Etexts in 1997 for a total of 1000+
+If these reach just 10% of the computerized population, then the
+total should reach over 100 billion Etexts given away.
+
+The Goal of Project Gutenberg is to Give Away One Trillion Etext
+Files by the December 31, 2001. [10,000 x 100,000,000=Trillion]
+This is ten thousand titles each to one hundred million readers,
+which is only 10% of the present number of computer users. 2001
+should have at least twice as many computer users as that, so it
+will require us reaching less than 5% of the users in 2001.
+
+
+We need your donations more than ever!
+
+
+All donations should be made to "Project Gutenberg/CMU": and are
+tax deductible to the extent allowable by law. (CMU = Carnegie-
+Mellon University).
+
+For these and other matters, please mail to:
+
+Project Gutenberg
+P. O. Box 2782
+Champaign, IL 61825
+
+When all other email fails try our Executive Director:
+Michael S. Hart <hart@pobox.com>
+
+We would prefer to send you this information by email
+(Internet, Bitnet, Compuserve, ATTMAIL or MCImail).
+
+******
+If you have an FTP program (or emulator), please
+FTP directly to the Project Gutenberg archives:
+[Mac users, do NOT point and click. . .type]
+
+ftp uiarchive.cso.uiuc.edu
+login: anonymous
+password: your@login
+cd etext/etext90 through /etext96
+or cd etext/articles [get suggest gut for more information]
+dir [to see files]
+get or mget [to get files. . .set bin for zip files]
+GET INDEX?00.GUT
+for a list of books
+and
+GET NEW GUT for general information
+and
+MGET GUT* for newsletters.
+
+**Information prepared by the Project Gutenberg legal advisor**
+(Three Pages)
+
+
+***START**THE SMALL PRINT!**FOR PUBLIC DOMAIN ETEXTS**START***
+Why is this "Small Print!" statement here? You know: lawyers.
+They tell us you might sue us if there is something wrong with
+your copy of this etext, even if you got it for free from
+someone other than us, and even if what's wrong is not our
+fault. So, among other things, this "Small Print!" statement
+disclaims most of our liability to you. It also tells you how
+you can distribute copies of this etext if you want to.
+
+*BEFORE!* YOU USE OR READ THIS ETEXT
+By using or reading any part of this PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm
+etext, you indicate that you understand, agree to and accept
+this "Small Print!" statement. If you do not, you can receive
+a refund of the money (if any) you paid for this etext by
+sending a request within 30 days of receiving it to the person
+you got it from. If you received this etext on a physical
+medium (such as a disk), you must return it with your request.
+
+ABOUT PROJECT GUTENBERG-TM ETEXTS
+This PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm etext, like most PROJECT GUTENBERG-
+tm etexts, is a "public domain" work distributed by Professor
+Michael S. Hart through the Project Gutenberg Association at
+Carnegie-Mellon University (the "Project"). Among other
+things, this means that no one owns a United States copyright
+on or for this work, so the Project (and you!) can copy and
+distribute it in the United States without permission and
+without paying copyright royalties. Special rules, set forth
+below, apply if you wish to copy and distribute this etext
+under the Project's "PROJECT GUTENBERG" trademark.
+
+To create these etexts, the Project expends considerable
+efforts to identify, transcribe and proofread public domain
+works. Despite these efforts, the Project's etexts and any
+medium they may be on may contain "Defects". Among other
+things, Defects may take the form of incomplete, inaccurate or
+corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other
+intellectual property infringement, a defective or damaged
+disk or other etext medium, a computer virus, or computer
+codes that damage or cannot be read by your equipment.
+
+LIMITED WARRANTY; DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES
+But for the "Right of Replacement or Refund" described below,
+[1] the Project (and any other party you may receive this
+etext from as a PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm etext) disclaims all
+liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including
+legal fees, and [2] YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE OR
+UNDER STRICT LIABILITY, OR FOR BREACH OF WARRANTY OR CONTRACT,
+INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE
+OR INCIDENTAL DAMAGES, EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE
+POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES.
+
+If you discover a Defect in this etext within 90 days of
+receiving it, you can receive a refund of the money (if any)
+you paid for it by sending an explanatory note within that
+time to the person you received it from. If you received it
+on a physical medium, you must return it with your note, and
+such person may choose to alternatively give you a replacement
+copy. If you received it electronically, such person may
+choose to alternatively give you a second opportunity to
+receive it electronically.
+
+THIS ETEXT IS OTHERWISE PROVIDED TO YOU "AS-IS". NO OTHER
+WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, ARE MADE TO YOU AS
+TO THE ETEXT OR ANY MEDIUM IT MAY BE ON, INCLUDING BUT NOT
+LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A
+PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
+
+Some states do not allow disclaimers of implied warranties or
+the exclusion or limitation of consequential damages, so the
+above disclaimers and exclusions may not apply to you, and you
+may have other legal rights.
+
+INDEMNITY
+You will indemnify and hold the Project, its directors,
+officers, members and agents harmless from all liability, cost
+and expense, including legal fees, that arise directly or
+indirectly from any of the following that you do or cause:
+[1] distribution of this etext, [2] alteration, modification,
+or addition to the etext, or [3] any Defect.
+
+DISTRIBUTION UNDER "PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm"
+You may distribute copies of this etext electronically, or by
+disk, book or any other medium if you either delete this
+"Small Print!" and all other references to Project Gutenberg,
+or:
+
+[1] Only give exact copies of it. Among other things, this
+ requires that you do not remove, alter or modify the
+ etext or this "small print!" statement. You may however,
+ if you wish, distribute this etext in machine readable
+ binary, compressed, mark-up, or proprietary form,
+ including any form resulting from conversion by word pro-
+ cessing or hypertext software, but only so long as
+ *EITHER*:
+
+ [*] The etext, when displayed, is clearly readable, and
+ does *not* contain characters other than those
+ intended by the author of the work, although tilde
+ (~), asterisk (*) and underline (_) characters may
+ be used to convey punctuation intended by the
+ author, and additional characters may be used to
+ indicate hypertext links; OR
+
+ [*] The etext may be readily converted by the reader at
+ no expense into plain ASCII, EBCDIC or equivalent
+ form by the program that displays the etext (as is
+ the case, for instance, with most word processors);
+ OR
+
+ [*] You provide, or agree to also provide on request at
+ no additional cost, fee or expense, a copy of the
+ etext in its original plain ASCII form (or in EBCDIC
+ or other equivalent proprietary form).
+
+[2] Honor the etext refund and replacement provisions of this
+ "Small Print!" statement.
+
+[3] Pay a trademark license fee to the Project of 20% of the
+ net profits you derive calculated using the method you
+ already use to calculate your applicable taxes. If you
+ don't derive profits, no royalty is due. Royalties are
+ payable to "Project Gutenberg Association/Carnegie-Mellon
+ University" within the 60 days following each
+ date you prepare (or were legally required to prepare)
+ your annual (or equivalent periodic) tax return.
+
+WHAT IF YOU *WANT* TO SEND MONEY EVEN IF YOU DON'T HAVE TO?
+The Project gratefully accepts contributions in money, time,
+scanning machines, OCR software, public domain etexts, royalty
+free copyright licenses, and every other sort of contribution
+you can think of. Money should be paid to "Project Gutenberg
+Association / Carnegie-Mellon University".
+
+*END*THE SMALL PRINT! FOR PUBLIC DOMAIN ETEXTS*Ver.04.29.93*END*
+
+
+
+
+
+War of the Classes
+
+by Jack London
+
+
+
+
+Contents:
+
+
+
+Preface
+The Class Struggle
+The Tramp
+The Scab
+The Question of the Maximum
+A Review
+Wanted: A New Land of Development
+How I Became a Socialist
+
+
+
+PREFACE
+
+
+
+When I was a youngster I was looked upon as a weird sort of
+creature, because, forsooth, I was a socialist. Reporters from
+local papers interviewed me, and the interviews, when published,
+were pathological studies of a strange and abnormal specimen of man.
+At that time (nine or ten years ago), because I made a stand in my
+native town for municipal ownership of public utilities, I was
+branded a "red-shirt," a "dynamiter," and an "anarchist"; and really
+decent fellows, who liked me very well, drew the line at my
+appearing in public with their sisters.
+
+But the times changed. There came a day when I heard, in my native
+town, a Republican mayor publicly proclaim that "municipal ownership
+was a fixed American policy." And in that day I found myself
+picking up in the world. No longer did the pathologist study me,
+while the really decent fellows did not mind in the least the
+propinquity of myself and their sisters in the public eye. My
+political and sociological ideas were ascribed to the vagaries of
+youth, and good-natured elderly men patronized me and told me that I
+would grow up some day and become an unusually intelligent member of
+the community. Also they told me that my views were biassed by my
+empty pockets, and that some day, when I had gathered to me a few
+dollars, my views would be wholly different,--in short, that my
+views would be their views.
+
+And then came the day when my socialism grew respectable,--still a
+vagary of youth, it was held, but romantically respectable.
+Romance, to the bourgeois mind, was respectable because it was not
+dangerous. As a "red-shirt," with bombs in all his pockets, I was
+dangerous. As a youth with nothing more menacing than a few
+philosophical ideas, Germanic in their origin, I was an interesting
+and pleasing personality.
+
+Through all this experience I noted one thing. It was not I that
+changed, but the community. In fact, my socialistic views grew
+solider and more pronounced. I repeat, it was the community that
+changed, and to my chagrin I discovered that the community changed
+to such purpose that it was not above stealing my thunder. The
+community branded me a "red-shirt" because I stood for municipal
+ownership; a little later it applauded its mayor when he proclaimed
+municipal ownership to be a fixed American policy. He stole my
+thunder, and the community applauded the theft. And today the
+community is able to come around and give me points on municipal
+ownership.
+
+What happened to me has been in no wise different from what has
+happened to the socialist movement as a whole in the United States.
+In the bourgeois mind socialism has changed from a terrible disease
+to a youthful vagary, and later on had its thunder stolen by the two
+old parties,--socialism, like a meek and thrifty workingman, being
+exploited became respectable.
+
+Only dangerous things are abhorrent. The thing that is not
+dangerous is always respectable. And so with socialism in the
+United States. For several years it has been very respectable,--a
+sweet and beautiful Utopian dream, in the bourgeois mind, yet a
+dream, only a dream. During this period, which has just ended,
+socialism was tolerated because it was impossible and non-menacing.
+Much of its thunder had been stolen, and the workingmen had been
+made happy with full dinner-pails. There was nothing to fear. The
+kind old world spun on, coupons were clipped, and larger profits
+than ever were extracted from the toilers. Coupon-clipping and
+profit-extracting would continue to the end of time. These were
+functions divine in origin and held by divine right. The
+newspapers, the preachers, and the college presidents said so, and
+what they say, of course, is so--to the bourgeois mind.
+
+Then came the presidential election of 1904. Like a bolt out of a
+clear sky was the socialist vote of 435,000,--an increase of nearly
+400 per cent in four years, the largest third-party vote, with one
+exception, since the Civil War. Socialism had shown that it was a
+very live and growing revolutionary force, and all its old menace
+revived. I am afraid that neither it nor I are any longer
+respectable. The capitalist press of the country confirms me in my
+opinion, and herewith I give a few post-election utterances of the
+capitalist press:-
+
+
+"The Democratic party of the constitution is dead. The Social-
+Democratic party of continental Europe, preaching discontent and
+class hatred, assailing law, property, and personal rights, and
+insinuating confiscation and plunder, is here."--Chicago Chronicle.
+
+"That over forty thousand votes should have been cast in this city
+to make such a person as Eugene V. Debs the President of the United
+States is about the worst kind of advertising that Chicago could
+receive."--Chicago Inter-Ocean.
+
+"We cannot blink the fact that socialism is making rapid growth in
+this country, where, of all others, there would seem to be less
+inspiration for it."--Brooklyn Daily Eagle.
+
+"Upon the hands of the Republican party an awful responsibility was
+placed last Tuesday. . . It knows that reforms--great, far-sweeping
+reforms--are necessary, and it has the power to make them. God help
+our civilization if it does not! . . . It must repress the trusts or
+stand before the world responsible for our system of government
+being changed into a social republic. The arbitrary cutting down of
+wages must cease, or socialism will seize another lever to lift
+itself into power."--The Chicago New World.
+
+"Scarcely any phase of the election is more sinisterly interesting
+than the increase in the socialist vote. Before election we said
+that we could not afford to give aid and comfort to the socialists
+in any manner. . . It (socialism) must be fought in all its phases,
+in its every manifestation."--San Francisco Argonaut.
+
+
+And far be it from me to deny that socialism is a menace. It is its
+purpose to wipe out, root and branch, all capitalistic institutions
+of present-day society. It is distinctly revolutionary, and in
+scope and depth is vastly more tremendous than any revolution that
+has ever occurred in the history of the world. It presents a new
+spectacle to the astonished world,--that of an ORGANIZED,
+INTERNATIONAL, REVOLUTIONARY MOVEMENT. In the bourgeois mind a
+class struggle is a terrible and hateful thing, and yet that is
+precisely what socialism is,--a world-wide class struggle between
+the propertyless workers and the propertied masters of workers. It
+is the prime preachment of socialism that the struggle is a class
+struggle. The working class, in the process of social evolution,
+(in the very nature of things), is bound to revolt from the sway of
+the capitalist class and to overthrow the capitalist class. This is
+the menace of socialism, and in affirming it and in tallying myself
+an adherent of it, I accept my own consequent unrespectability.
+
+As yet, to the average bourgeois mind, socialism is merely a menace,
+vague and formless. The average member of the capitalist class,
+when he discusses socialism, is condemned an ignoramus out of his
+own mouth. He does not know the literature of socialism, its
+philosophy, nor its politics. He wags his head sagely and rattles
+the dry bones of dead and buried ideas. His lips mumble mouldy
+phrases, such as, "Men are not born equal and never can be;" "It is
+Utopian and impossible;" "Abstinence should be rewarded;" "Man will
+first have to be born again;" "Cooperative colonies have always
+failed;" and "What if we do divide up? in ten years there would be
+rich and poor men such as there are today."
+
+It surely is time that the capitalists knew something about this
+socialism that they feel menaces them. And it is the hope of the
+writer that the socialistic studies in this volume may in some
+slight degree enlighten a few capitalistic minds. The capitalist
+must learn, first and for always, that socialism is based, not upon
+the equality, but upon the inequality, of men. Next, he must learn
+that no new birth into spiritual purity is necessary before
+socialism becomes possible. He must learn that socialism deals with
+what is, not with what ought to be; and that the material with which
+it deals is the "clay of the common road," the warm human, fallible
+and frail, sordid and petty, absurd and contradictory, even
+grotesque, and yet, withal, shot through with flashes and
+glimmerings of something finer and God-like, with here and there
+sweetnesses of service and unselfishness, desires for goodness, for
+renunciation and sacrifice, and with conscience, stern and awful, at
+times blazingly imperious, demanding the right,--the right, nothing
+more nor less than the right.
+
+JACK LONDON.
+OAKLAND, CALIFORNIA.
+January 12, 1905.
+
+
+
+THE CLASS STRUGGLE
+
+
+
+Unfortunately or otherwise, people are prone to believe in the
+reality of the things they think ought to be so. This comes of the
+cheery optimism which is innate with life itself; and, while it may
+sometimes be deplored, it must never be censured, for, as a rule, it
+is productive of more good than harm, and of about all the
+achievement there is in the world. There are cases where this
+optimism has been disastrous, as with the people who lived in
+Pompeii during its last quivering days; or with the aristocrats of
+the time of Louis XVI, who confidently expected the Deluge to
+overwhelm their children, or their children's children, but never
+themselves. But there is small likelihood that the case of perverse
+optimism here to be considered will end in such disaster, while
+there is every reason to believe that the great change now
+manifesting itself in society will be as peaceful and orderly in its
+culmination as it is in its present development.
+
+Out of their constitutional optimism, and because a class struggle
+is an abhorred and dangerous thing, the great American people are
+unanimous in asserting that there is no class struggle. And by
+"American people" is meant the recognized and authoritative mouth-
+pieces of the American people, which are the press, the pulpit, and
+the university. The journalists, the preachers, and the professors
+are practically of one voice in declaring that there is no such
+thing as a class struggle now going on, much less that a class
+struggle will ever go on, in the United States. And this
+declaration they continually make in the face of a multitude of
+facts which impeach, not so much their sincerity, as affirm, rather,
+their optimism.
+
+There are two ways of approaching the subject of the class struggle.
+The existence of this struggle can be shown theoretically, and it
+can be shown actually. For a class struggle to exist in society
+there must be, first, a class inequality, a superior class and an
+inferior class (as measured by power); and, second, the outlets must
+be closed whereby the strength and ferment of the inferior class
+have been permitted to escape.
+
+That there are even classes in the United States is vigorously
+denied by many; but it is incontrovertible, when a group of
+individuals is formed, wherein the members are bound together by
+common interests which are peculiarly their interests and not the
+interests of individuals outside the group, that such a group is a
+class. The owners of capital, with their dependents, form a class
+of this nature in the United States; the working people form a
+similar class. The interest of the capitalist class, say, in the
+matter of income tax, is quite contrary to the interest of the
+laboring class; and, VICE VERSA, in the matter of poll-tax.
+
+If between these two classes there be a clear and vital conflict of
+interest, all the factors are present which make a class struggle;
+but this struggle will lie dormant if the strong and capable members
+of the inferior class be permitted to leave that class and join the
+ranks of the superior class. The capitalist class and the working
+class have existed side by side and for a long time in the United
+States; but hitherto all the strong, energetic members of the
+working class have been able to rise out of their class and become
+owners of capital. They were enabled to do this because an
+undeveloped country with an expanding frontier gave equality of
+opportunity to all. In the almost lottery-like scramble for the
+ownership of vast unowned natural resources, and in the exploitation
+of which there was little or no competition of capital, (the capital
+itself rising out of the exploitation), the capable, intelligent
+member of the working class found a field in which to use his brains
+to his own advancement. Instead of being discontented in direct
+ratio with his intelligence and ambitions, and of radiating amongst
+his fellows a spirit of revolt as capable as he was capable, he left
+them to their fate and carved his own way to a place in the superior
+class.
+
+But the day of an expanding frontier, of a lottery-like scramble for
+the ownership of natural resources, and of the upbuilding of new
+industries, is past. Farthest West has been reached, and an immense
+volume of surplus capital roams for investment and nips in the bud
+the patient efforts of the embryo capitalist to rise through slow
+increment from small beginnings. The gateway of opportunity after
+opportunity has been closed, and closed for all time. Rockefeller
+has shut the door on oil, the American Tobacco Company on tobacco,
+and Carnegie on steel. After Carnegie came Morgan, who triple-
+locked the door. These doors will not open again, and before them
+pause thousands of ambitious young men to read the placard: NO
+THOROUGH-FARE.
+
+And day by day more doors are shut, while the ambitious young men
+continue to be born. It is they, denied the opportunity to rise
+from the working class, who preach revolt to the working class. Had
+he been born fifty years later, Andrew Carnegie, the poor Scotch
+boy, might have risen to be president of his union, or of a
+federation of unions; but that he would never have become the
+builder of Homestead and the founder of multitudinous libraries, is
+as certain as it is certain that some other man would have developed
+the steel industry had Andrew Carnegie never been born.
+
+Theoretically, then, there exist in the United States all the
+factors which go to make a class struggle. There are the
+capitalists and working classes, the interests of which conflict,
+while the working class is no longer being emasculated to the extent
+it was in the past by having drawn off from it its best blood and
+brains. Its more capable members are no longer able to rise out of
+it and leave the great mass leaderless and helpless. They remain to
+be its leaders.
+
+But the optimistic mouthpieces of the great American people, who are
+themselves deft theoreticians, are not to be convinced by mere
+theoretics. So it remains to demonstrate the existence of the class
+struggle by a marshalling of the facts.
+
+When nearly two millions of men, finding themselves knit together by
+certain interests peculiarly their own, band together in a strong
+organization for the aggressive pursuit of those interests, it is
+evident that society has within it a hostile and warring class. But
+when the interests which this class aggressively pursues conflict
+sharply and vitally with the interests of another class, class
+antagonism arises and a class struggle is the inevitable result.
+One great organization of labor alone has a membership of 1,700,000
+in the United States. This is the American Federation of Labor, and
+outside of it are many other large organizations. All these men are
+banded together for the frank purpose of bettering their condition,
+regardless of the harm worked thereby upon all other classes. They
+are in open antagonism with the capitalist class, while the
+manifestos of their leaders state that the struggle is one which can
+never end until the capitalist class is exterminated.
+
+Their leaders will largely deny this last statement, but an
+examination of their utterances, their actions, and the situation
+will forestall such denial. In the first place, the conflict
+between labor and capital is over the division of the join product.
+Capital and labor apply themselves to raw material and make it into
+a finished product. The difference between the value of the raw
+material and the value of the finished product is the value they
+have added to it by their joint effort. This added value is,
+therefore, their joint product, and it is over the division of this
+joint product that the struggle between labor and capital takes
+place. Labor takes its share in wages; capital takes its share in
+profits. It is patent, if capital took in profits the whole joint
+product, that labor would perish. And it is equally patent, if
+labor took in wages the whole joint product, that capital would
+perish. Yet this last is the very thing labor aspires to do, and
+that it will never be content with anything less than the whole
+joint product is evidenced by the words of its leaders.
+
+Mr. Samuel Gompers, president of the American Federation of Labor,
+has said: "The workers want more wages; more of the comforts of
+life; more leisure; more chance for self-improvement as men, as
+trade-unionists, as citizens. THESE WERE THE WANTS OF YESTERDAY;
+THEY ARE THE WANTS OF TODAY; THEY WILL BE THE WANTS OF TOMORROW, AND
+OF TOMORROW'S MORROW. The struggle may assume new forms, but the
+issue is the immemorial one,--an effort of the producers to obtain
+an increasing measure of the wealth that flows from their
+production."
+
+Mr. Henry White, secretary of the United Garment Workers of America
+and a member of the Industrial Committee of the National Civic
+Federation, speaking of the National Civic Federation soon after its
+inception, said: "To fall into one another's arms, to avow
+friendship, to express regret at the injury which has been done,
+would not alter the facts of the situation. Workingmen will
+continue to demand more pay, and the employer will naturally oppose
+them. The readiness and ability of the workmen to fight will, as
+usual, largely determine the amount of their wages or their share in
+the product. . . But when it comes to dividing the proceeds, there
+is the rub. We can also agree that the larger the product through
+the employment of labor-saving methods the better, as there will be
+more to be divided, but again the question of the division. . . . A
+Conciliation Committee, having the confidence of the community, and
+composed of men possessing practical knowledge of industrial
+affairs, can therefore aid in mitigating this antagonism, in
+preventing avoidable conflicts, in bringing about a TRUCE; I use the
+word 'truce' because understandings can only be temporary."
+
+Here is a man who might have owned cattle on a thousand hills, been
+a lumber baron or a railroad king, had he been born a few years
+sooner. As it is, he remains in his class, is secretary of the
+United Garment Workers of America, and is so thoroughly saturated
+with the class struggle that he speaks of the dispute between
+capital and labor in terms of war,--workmen FIGHT with employers; it
+is possible to avoid some CONFLICTS; in certain cases TRUCES may be,
+for the time being, effected.
+
+Man being man and a great deal short of the angels, the quarrel over
+the division of the joint product is irreconcilable. For the last
+twenty years in the United States, there has been an average of over
+a thousand strikes per year; and year by year these strikes increase
+in magnitude, and the front of the labor army grows more imposing.
+And it is a class struggle, pure and simple. Labor as a class is
+fighting with capital as a class.
+
+Workingmen will continue to demand more pay, and employers will
+continue to oppose them. This is the key-note to LAISSEZ FAIRE,--
+everybody for himself and devil take the hindmost. It is upon this
+that the rampant individualist bases his individualism. It is the
+let-alone policy, the struggle for existence, which strengthens the
+strong, destroys the weak, and makes a finer and more capable breed
+of men. But the individual has passed away and the group has come,
+for better or worse, and the struggle has become, not a struggle
+between individuals, but a struggle between groups. So the query
+rises: Has the individualist never speculated upon the labor group
+becoming strong enough to destroy the capitalist group, and take to
+itself and run for itself the machinery of industry? And, further,
+has the individualist never speculated upon this being still a
+triumphant expression of individualism,--of group individualism,--if
+the confusion of terms may be permitted?
+
+But the facts of the class struggle are deeper and more significant
+than have so far been presented. A million or so of workmen may
+organize for the pursuit of interests which engender class
+antagonism and strife, and at the same time be unconscious of what
+is engendered. But when a million or so of workmen show
+unmistakable signs of being conscious of their class,--of being, in
+short, class conscious,--then the situation grows serious. The
+uncompromising and terrible hatred of the trade-unionist for a scab
+is the hatred of a class for a traitor to that class,--while the
+hatred of a trade-unionist for the militia is the hatred of a class
+for a weapon wielded by the class with which it is fighting. No
+workman can be true to his class and at the same time be a member of
+the militia: this is the dictum of the labor leaders.
+
+In the town of the writer, the good citizens, when they get up a
+Fourth of July parade and invite the labor unions to participate,
+are informed by the unions that they will not march in the parade if
+the militia marches. Article 8 of the constitution of the Painters'
+and Decorators' Union of Schenectady provides that a member must not
+be a "militiaman, special police officer, or deputy marshal in the
+employ of corporations or individuals during strikes, lockouts, or
+other labor difficulties, and any member occupying any of the above
+positions will be debarred from membership." Mr. William Potter was
+a member of this union and a member of the National Guard. As a
+result, because he obeyed the order of the Governor when his company
+was ordered out to suppress rioting, he was expelled from his union.
+Also his union demanded his employers, Shafer & Barry, to discharge
+him from their service. This they complied with, rather than face
+the threatened strike.
+
+Mr. Robert L. Walker, first lieutenant of the Light Guards, a New
+Haven militia company, recently resigned. His reason was, that he
+was a member of the Car Builders' Union, and that the two
+organizations were antagonistic to each other. During a New Orleans
+street-car strike not long ago, a whole company of militia, called
+out to protect non-union men, resigned in a body. Mr. John
+Mulholland, president of the International Association of Allied
+Metal Mechanics, has stated that he does not want the members to
+join the militia. The Local Trades' Assembly of Syracuse, New York,
+has passed a resolution, by unanimous vote, requiring union men who
+are members of the National Guard to resign, under pain of
+expulsion, from the unions. The Amalgamated Sheet Metal Workers'
+Association has incorporated in its constitution an amendment
+excluding from membership in its organization "any person a member
+of the regular army, or of the State militia or naval reserve." The
+Illinois State Federation of Labor, at a recent convention, passed
+without a dissenting vote a resolution declaring that membership in
+military organizations is a violation of labor union obligations,
+and requesting all union men to withdraw from the militia. The
+president of the Federation, Mr. Albert Young, declared that the
+militia was a menace not only to unions, but to all workers
+throughout the country.
+
+These instances may be multiplied a thousand fold. The union
+workmen are becoming conscious of their class, and of the struggle
+their class is waging with the capitalist class. To be a member of
+the militia is to be a traitor to the union, for the militia is a
+weapon wielded by the employers to crush the workers in the struggle
+between the warring groups.
+
+Another interesting, and even more pregnant, phase of the class
+struggle is the political aspect of it as displayed by the
+socialists. Five men, standing together, may perform prodigies; 500
+men, marching as marched the historic Five Hundred of Marseilles,
+may sack a palace and destroy a king; while 500,000 men,
+passionately preaching the propaganda of a class struggle, waging a
+class struggle along political lines, and backed by the moral and
+intellectual support of 10,000,000 more men of like convictions
+throughout the world, may come pretty close to realizing a class
+struggle in these United States of ours.
+
+In 1900 these men cast 150,000 votes; two years later, in 1902, they
+cast 300,000 votes; and in 1904 they cast 450,000. They have behind
+them a most imposing philosophic and scientific literature; they own
+illustrated magazines and reviews, high in quality, dignity, and
+restraint; they possess countless daily and weekly papers which
+circulate throughout the land, and single papers which have
+subscribers by the hundreds of thousands; and they literally swamp
+the working classes in a vast sea of tracts and pamphlets. No
+political party in the United States, no church organization nor
+mission effort, has as indefatigable workers as has the socialist
+party. They multiply themselves, know of no effort nor sacrifice
+too great to make for the Cause; and "Cause," with them, is spelled
+out in capitals. They work for it with a religious zeal, and would
+die for it with a willingness similar to that of the Christian
+martyrs.
+
+These men are preaching an uncompromising and deadly class struggle.
+In fact, they are organized upon the basis of a class struggle.
+"The history of society," they say, "is a history of class
+struggles. Patrician struggled with plebeian in early Rome; the
+king and the burghers, with the nobles in the Middle Ages; later on,
+the king and the nobles with the bourgeoisie; and today the struggle
+is on between the triumphant bourgeoisie and the rising proletariat.
+By 'proletariat' is meant the class of people without capital which
+sells its labor for a living.
+
+"That the proletariat shall conquer," (mark the note of fatalism),
+"is as certain as the rising sun. Just as the bourgeoisie of the
+eighteenth century wanted democracy applied to politics, so the
+proletariat of the twentieth century wants democracy applied to
+industry. As the bourgeoisie complained against the government
+being run by and for the nobles, so the proletariat complains
+against the government and industry being run by and for the
+bourgeoisie; and so, following in the footsteps of its predecessor,
+the proletariat will possess itself of the government, apply
+democracy to industry, abolish wages, which are merely legalized
+robbery, and run the business of the country in its own interest."
+
+"Their aim," they say, "is to organize the working class, and those
+in sympathy with it, into a political party, with the object of
+conquering the powers of government and of using them for the
+purpose of transforming the present system of private ownership of
+the means of production and distribution into collective ownership
+by the entire people."
+
+Briefly stated, this is the battle plan of these 450,000 men who
+call themselves "socialists." And, in the face of the existence of
+such an aggressive group of men, a class struggle cannot very well
+be denied by the optimistic Americans who say: "A class struggle is
+monstrous. Sir, there is no class struggle." The class struggle is
+here, and the optimistic American had better gird himself for the
+fray and put a stop to it, rather than sit idly declaiming that what
+ought not to be is not, and never will be.
+
+But the socialists, fanatics and dreamers though they may well be,
+betray a foresight and insight, and a genius for organization, which
+put to shame the class with which they are openly at war. Failing
+of rapid success in waging a sheer political propaganda, and finding
+that they were alienating the most intelligent and most easily
+organized portion of the voters, the socialists lessoned from the
+experience and turned their energies upon the trade-union movement.
+To win the trade unions was well-nigh to win the war, and recent
+events show that they have done far more winning in this direction
+than have the capitalists.
+
+Instead of antagonizing the unions, which had been their previous
+policy, the socialists proceeded to conciliate the unions. "Let
+every good socialist join the union of his trade," the edict went
+forth. "Bore from within and capture the trade-union movement."
+And this policy, only several years old, has reaped fruits far
+beyond their fondest expectations. Today the great labor unions are
+honeycombed with socialists, "boring from within," as they
+picturesquely term their undermining labor. At work and at play, at
+business meeting and council, their insidious propaganda goes on.
+At the shoulder of the trade-unionist is the socialist, sympathizing
+with him, aiding him with head and hand, suggesting--perpetually
+suggesting--the necessity for political action. As the JOURNAL, of
+Lansing, Michigan, a republican paper, has remarked: "The
+socialists in the labor unions are tireless workers. They are
+sincere, energetic, and self-sacrificing. . . . They stick to the
+union and work all the while, thus making a showing which, reckoned
+by ordinary standards, is out of all proportion to their numbers.
+Their cause is growing among union laborers, and their long fight,
+intended to turn the Federation into a political organization, is
+likely to win."
+
+They miss no opportunity of driving home the necessity for political
+action, the necessity for capturing the political machinery of
+society whereby they may master society. As an instance of this is
+the avidity with which the American socialists seized upon the
+famous Taft-Vale Decision in England, which was to the effect that
+an unincorporated union could be sued and its treasury rifled by
+process of law. Throughout the United States, the socialists
+pointed the moral in similar fashion to the way it was pointed by
+the Social-Democratic Herald, which advised the trade-unionists, in
+view of the decision, to stop trying to fight capital with money,
+which they lacked, and to begin fighting with the ballot, which was
+their strongest weapon.
+
+Night and day, tireless and unrelenting, they labor at their self-
+imposed task of undermining society. Mr. M. G. Cunniff, who lately
+made an intimate study of trade-unionism, says: "All through the
+unions socialism filters. Almost every other man is a socialist,
+preaching that unionism is but a makeshift." "Malthus be damned,"
+they told him, "for the good time was coming when every man should
+be able to rear his family in comfort." In one union, with two
+thousand members, Mr. Cunniff found every man a socialist, and from
+his experiences Mr. Cunniff was forced to confess, "I lived in a
+world that showed our industrial life a-tremble from beneath with a
+never-ceasing ferment."
+
+The socialists have already captured the Western Federation of
+Miners, the Western Hotel and Restaurant Employees' Union, and the
+Patternmakers' National Association. The Western Federation of
+Miners, at a recent convention, declared: "The strike has failed to
+secure to the working classes their liberty; we therefore call upon
+the workers to strike as one man for their liberties at the ballot
+box. . . . We put ourselves on record as committed to the programme
+of independent political action. . . . We indorse the platform of
+the socialist party, and accept it as the declaration of principles
+of our organization. We call upon our members as individuals to
+commence immediately the organization of the socialist movement in
+their respective towns and states, and to cooperate in every way for
+the furtherance of the principles of socialism and of the socialist
+party. In states where the socialist party has not perfected its
+organization, we advise that every assistance be given by our
+members to that end. . . . We therefore call for organizers, capable
+and well-versed in the whole programme of the labor movement, to be
+sent into each state to preach the necessity of organization on the
+political as well as on the economic field."
+
+The capitalist class has a glimmering consciousness of the class
+struggle which is shaping itself in the midst of society; but the
+capitalists, as a class, seem to lack the ability for organizing,
+for coming together, such as is possessed by the working class. No
+American capitalist ever aids an English capitalist in the common
+fight, while workmen have formed international unions, the
+socialists a world-wide international organization, and on all sides
+space and race are bridged in the effort to achieve solidarity.
+Resolutions of sympathy, and, fully as important, donations of
+money, pass back and forth across the sea to wherever labor is
+fighting its pitched battles.
+
+For divers reasons, the capitalist class lacks this cohesion or
+solidarity, chief among which is the optimism bred of past success.
+And, again, the capitalist class is divided; it has within itself a
+class struggle of no mean proportions, which tends to irritate and
+harass it and to confuse the situation. The small capitalist and
+the large capitalist are grappled with each other, struggling over
+what Achille Loria calls the "bi-partition of the revenues." Such a
+struggle, though not precisely analogous, was waged between the
+landlords and manufacturers of England when the one brought about
+the passage of the Factory Acts and the other the abolition of the
+Corn Laws.
+
+Here and there, however, certain members of the capitalist class see
+clearly the cleavage in society along which the struggle is
+beginning to show itself, while the press and magazines are
+beginning to raise an occasional and troubled voice. Two leagues of
+class-conscious capitalists have been formed for the purpose of
+carrying on their side of the struggle. Like the socialists, they
+do not mince matters, but state boldly and plainly that they are
+fighting to subjugate the opposing class. It is the barons against
+the commons. One of these leagues, the National Association of
+Manufacturers, is stopping short of nothing in what it conceives to
+be a life-and-death struggle. Mr. D. M. Parry, who is the president
+of the league, as well as president of the National Metal Trades'
+Association, is leaving no stone unturned in what he feels to be a
+desperate effort to organize his class. He has issued the call to
+arms in terms everything but ambiguous: "THERE IS STILL TIME IN THE
+UNITED STALES TO HEAD OFF THE SOCIALISTIC PROGRAMME, WHICH,
+UNRESTRAINED, IS SURE TO WRECK OUR COUNTRY."
+
+As he says, the work is for "federating employers in order that we
+may meet with a united front all issues that affect us. We must
+come to this sooner or later. . . . The work immediately before the
+National Association of Manufacturers is, first, KEEP THE VICIOUS
+EIGHT-HOUR BILL OFF THE BOOKS; second, to DESTROY THE ANTI-
+INJUNCTION BILL, which wrests your business from you and places it
+in the hands of your employees; third, to secure the PASSAGE OF THE
+DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRY BILL; the latter would go
+through with a rush were it not for the hectoring opposition of
+Organized Labor." By this department, he further says, "business
+interests would have direct and sympathetic representation at
+Washington."
+
+In a later letter, issued broadcast to the capitalists outside the
+League, President Parry points out the success which is already
+beginning to attend the efforts of the League at Washington. "We
+have contributed more than any other influence to the quick passage
+of the new Department of Commerce Bill. It is said that the
+activities of this office are numerous and satisfactory; but of that
+I must not say too much--or anything. . . . At Washington the
+Association is not represented too much, either directly or
+indirectly. Sometimes it is known in a most powerful way that it is
+represented vigorously and unitedly. Sometimes it is not known that
+it is represented at all."
+
+The second class-conscious capitalist organization is called the
+National Economic League. It likewise manifests the frankness of
+men who do not dilly-dally with terms, but who say what they mean,
+and who mean to settle down to a long, hard fight. Their letter of
+invitation to prospective members opens boldly. "We beg to inform
+you that the National Economic League will render its services in an
+impartial educational movement TO OPPOSE SOCIALISM AND CLASS
+HATRED." Among its class-conscious members, men who recognize that
+the opening guns of the class struggle have been fired, may be
+instanced the following names: Hon. Lyman J. Gage, Ex-Secretary U.
+S. Treasury; Hon. Thomas Jefferson Coolidge, Ex-Minister to France;
+Rev. Henry C. Potter, Bishop New York Diocese; Hon. John D. Long,
+Ex-Secretary U. S. Navy; Hon. Levi P. Morton, Ex-Vice President
+United States; Henry Clews; John F. Dryden, President Prudential
+Life Insurance Co.; John A. McCall, President New York Life
+Insurance Co.; J. L. Greatsinger, President Brooklyn Rapid Transit
+Co.; the shipbuilding firm of William Cramp & Sons, the Southern
+Railway system, and the Atchison, Topeka, & Santa Fe Railway
+Company.
+
+Instances of the troubled editorial voice have not been rare during
+the last several years. There were many cries from the press during
+the last days of the anthracite coal strike that the mine owners, by
+their stubbornness, were sowing the regrettable seeds of socialism.
+The World's Work for December, 1902, said: "The next significant
+fact is the recommendation by the Illinois State Federation of Labor
+that all members of labor unions who are also members of the state
+militia shall resign from the militia. This proposition has been
+favorably regarded by some other labor organizations. It has done
+more than any other single recent declaration or action to cause a
+public distrust of such unions as favor it. IT HINTS OF A CLASS
+SEPARATION THAT IN TURN HINTS OF ANARCHY."
+
+The OUTLOOK, February 14, 1903, in reference to the rioting at
+Waterbury, remarks, "That all this disorder should have occurred in
+a city of the character and intelligence of Waterbury indicates that
+the industrial war spirit is by no means confined to the immigrant
+or ignorant working classes."
+
+That President Roosevelt has smelt the smoke from the firing line of
+the class struggle is evidenced by his words, "Above all we need to
+remember that any kind of CLASS ANIMOSITY IN THE POLITICAL WORLD is,
+if possible, even more destructive to national welfare than
+sectional, race, or religious animosity." The chief thing to be
+noted here is President Roosevelt's tacit recognition of class
+animosity in the industrial world, and his fear, which language
+cannot portray stronger, that this class animosity may spread to the
+political world. Yet this is the very policy which the socialists
+have announced in their declaration of war against present-day
+society--to capture the political machinery of society and by that
+machinery destroy present-day society.
+
+The New York Independent for February 12, 1903, recognized without
+qualification the class struggle. "It is impossible fairly to pass
+upon the methods of labor unions, or to devise plans for remedying
+their abuses, until it is recognized, to begin with, that unions are
+based upon class antagonism and that their policies are dictated by
+the necessities of social warfare. A strike is a rebellion against
+the owners of property. The rights of property are protected by
+government. And a strike, under certain provocation, may extend as
+far as did the general strike in Belgium a few years since, when
+practically the entire wage-earning population stopped work in order
+to force political concessions from the property-owning classes.
+This is an extreme case, but it brings out vividly the real nature
+of labor organization as a species of warfare whose object is the
+coercion of one class by another class."
+
+It has been shown, theoretically and actually, that there is a class
+struggle in the United States. The quarrel over the division of the
+joint product is irreconcilable. The working class is no longer
+losing its strongest and most capable members. These men, denied
+room for their ambition in the capitalist ranks, remain to be the
+leaders of the workers, to spur them to discontent, to make them
+conscious of their class, to lead them to revolt.
+
+This revolt, appearing spontaneously all over the industrial field
+in the form of demands for an increased share of the joint product,
+is being carefully and shrewdly shaped for a political assault upon
+society. The leaders, with the carelessness of fatalists, do not
+hesitate for an instant to publish their intentions to the world.
+They intend to direct the labor revolt to the capture of the
+political machinery of society. With the political machinery once
+in their hands, which will also give them the control of the police,
+the army, the navy, and the courts, they will confiscate, with or
+without remuneration, all the possessions of the capitalist class
+which are used in the production and distribution of the necessaries
+and luxuries of life. By this, they mean to apply the law of
+eminent domain to the land, and to extend the law of eminent domain
+till it embraces the mines, the factories, the railroads, and the
+ocean carriers. In short, they intend to destroy present-day
+society, which they contend is run in the interest of another class,
+and from the materials to construct a new society, which will be run
+in their interest.
+
+On the other hand, the capitalist class is beginning to grow
+conscious of itself and of the struggle which is being waged. It is
+already forming offensive and defensive leagues, while some of the
+most prominent figures in the nation are preparing to lead it in the
+attack upon socialism.
+
+The question to be solved is not one of Malthusianism, "projected
+efficiency," nor ethics. It is a question of might. Whichever
+class is to win, will win by virtue of superior strength; for the
+workers are beginning to say, as they said to Mr. Cunniff, "Malthus
+be damned." In their own minds they find no sanction for continuing
+the individual struggle for the survival of the fittest. As Mr.
+Gompers has said, they want more, and more, and more. The ethical
+import of Mr. Kidd's plan of the present generation putting up with
+less in order that race efficiency may be projected into a remote
+future, has no bearing upon their actions. They refuse to be the
+"glad perishers" so glowingly described by Nietzsche.
+
+It remains to be seen how promptly the capitalist class will respond
+to the call to arms. Upon its promptness rests its existence, for
+if it sits idly by, soothfully proclaiming that what ought not to be
+cannot be, it will find the roof beams crashing about its head. The
+capitalist class is in the numerical minority, and bids fair to be
+outvoted if it does not put a stop to the vast propaganda being
+waged by its enemy. It is no longer a question of whether or not
+there is a class struggle. The question now is, what will be the
+outcome of the class struggle?
+
+
+
+THE TRAMP
+
+
+
+Mr. Francis O'Neil, General Superintendent of Police, Chicago,
+speaking of the tramp, says: "Despite the most stringent police
+regulations, a great city will have a certain number of homeless
+vagrants to shelter through the winter." "Despite,"--mark the word,
+a confession of organized helplessness as against unorganized
+necessity. If police regulations are stringent and yet fail, then
+that which makes them fail, namely, the tramp, must have still more
+stringent reasons for succeeding. This being so, it should be of
+interest to inquire into these reasons, to attempt to discover why
+the nameless and homeless vagrant sets at naught the right arm of
+the corporate power of our great cities, why all that is weak and
+worthless is stronger than all that is strong and of value.
+
+Mr. O'Neil is a man of wide experience on the subject of tramps. He
+may be called a specialist. As he says of himself: "As an old-time
+desk sergeant and police captain, I have had almost unlimited
+opportunity to study and analyze this class of floating population,
+which seeks the city in winter and scatters abroad through the
+country in the spring." He then continues: "This experience
+reiterated the lesson that the vast majority of these wanderers are
+of the class with whom a life of vagrancy is a chosen means of
+living without work." Not only is it to be inferred from this that
+there is a large class in society which lives without work, for Mr.
+O'Neil's testimony further shows that this class is forced to live
+without work.
+
+He says: "I have been astonished at the multitude of those who have
+unfortunately engaged in occupations which practically force them to
+become loafers for at least a third of the year. And it is from
+this class that the tramps are largely recruited. I recall a
+certain winter when it seemed to me that a large portion of the
+inhabitants of Chicago belonged to this army of unfortunates. I was
+stationed at a police station not far from where an ice harvest was
+ready for the cutters. The ice company advertised for helpers, and
+the very night this call appeared in the newspapers our station was
+packed with homeless men, who asked shelter in order to be at hand
+for the morning's work. Every foot of floor space was given over to
+these lodgers and scores were still unaccommodated."
+
+And again: "And it must be confessed that the man who is willing to
+do honest labor for food and shelter is a rare specimen in this vast
+army of shabby and tattered wanderers who seek the warmth of the
+city with the coming of the first snow." Taking into consideration
+the crowd of honest laborers that swamped Mr. O'Neil's station-house
+on the way to the ice-cutting, it is patent, if all tramps were
+looking for honest labor instead of a small minority, that the
+honest laborers would have a far harder task finding something
+honest to do for food and shelter. If the opinion of the honest
+laborers who swamped Mr. O'Neil's station-house were asked, one
+could rest confident that each and every man would express a
+preference for fewer honest laborers on the morrow when he asked the
+ice foreman for a job.
+
+And, finally, Mr. O'Neil says: "The humane and generous treatment
+which this city has accorded the great army of homeless unfortunates
+has made it the victim of wholesale imposition, and this well-
+intended policy of kindness has resulted in making Chicago the
+winter Mecca of a vast and undesirable floating population." That
+is to say, because of her kindness, Chicago had more than her fair
+share of tramps; because she was humane and generous she suffered
+whole-sale imposition. From this we must conclude that it does not
+do to be HUMANE and GENEROUS to our fellow-men--when they are
+tramps. Mr. O'Neil is right, and that this is no sophism it is the
+intention of this article, among other things, to show.
+
+In a general way we may draw the following inferences from the
+remarks of Mr. O'Neil: (1) The tramp is stronger than organized
+society and cannot be put down; (2) The tramp is "shabby,"
+"tattered," "homeless," "unfortunate"; (3) There is a "vast" number
+of tramps; (4) Very few tramps are willing to do honest work; (5)
+Those tramps who are willing to do honest work have to hunt very
+hard to find it; (6) The tramp is undesirable.
+
+To this last let the contention be appended that the tramp is only
+PERSONALLY undesirable; that he is NEGATIVELY desirable; that the
+function he performs in society is a negative function; and that he
+is the by-product of economic necessity.
+
+It is very easy to demonstrate that there are more men than there is
+work for men to do. For instance, what would happen tomorrow if one
+hundred thousand tramps should become suddenly inspired with an
+overmastering desire for work? It is a fair question. "Go to work"
+is preached to the tramp every day of his life. The judge on the
+bench, the pedestrian in the street, the housewife at the kitchen
+door, all unite in advising him to go to work. So what would happen
+tomorrow if one hundred thousand tramps acted upon this advice and
+strenuously and indomitably sought work? Why, by the end of the
+week one hundred thousand workers, their places taken by the tramps,
+would receive their time and be "hitting the road" for a job.
+
+Ella Wheeler Wilcox unwittingly and uncomfortably demonstrated the
+disparity between men and work. {1} She made a casual reference, in
+a newspaper column she conducts, to the difficulty two business men
+found in obtaining good employees. The first morning mail brought
+her seventy-five applications for the position, and at the end of
+two weeks over two hundred people had applied.
+
+Still more strikingly was the same proposition recently demonstrated
+in San Francisco. A sympathetic strike called out a whole
+federation of trades' unions. Thousands of men, in many branches of
+trade, quit work,--draymen, sand teamsters, porters and packers,
+longshoremen, stevedores, warehousemen, stationary engineers,
+sailors, marine firemen, stewards, sea-cooks, and so forth,--an
+interminable list. It was a strike of large proportions. Every
+Pacific coast shipping city was involved, and the entire coasting
+service, from San Diego to Puget Sound, was virtually tied up. The
+time was considered auspicious. The Philippines and Alaska had
+drained the Pacific coast of surplus labor. It was summer-time,
+when the agricultural demand for laborers was at its height, and
+when the cities were bare of their floating populations. And yet
+there remained a body of surplus labor sufficient to take the places
+of the strikers. No matter what occupation, sea-cook or stationary
+engineer, sand teamster or warehouseman, in every case there was an
+idle worker ready to do the work. And not only ready but anxious.
+They fought for a chance to work. Men were killed, hundreds of
+heads were broken, the hospitals were filled with injured men, and
+thousands of assaults were committed. And still surplus laborers,
+"scabs," came forward to replace the strikers.
+
+The question arises: WHENCE CAME THIS SECOND ARMY OF WORKERS TO
+REPLACE THE FIRST ARMY? One thing is certain: the trades' unions
+did not scab on one another. Another thing is certain: no industry
+on the Pacific slope was crippled in the slightest degree by its
+workers being drawn away to fill the places of the strikers. A
+third thing is certain: the agricultural workers did not flock to
+the cities to replace the strikers. In this last instance it is
+worth while to note that the agricultural laborers wailed to High
+Heaven when a few of the strikers went into the country to compete
+with them in unskilled employments. So there is no accounting for
+this second army of workers. It simply was. It was there all this
+time, a surplus labor army in the year of our Lord 1901, a year
+adjudged most prosperous in the annals of the United States. {2}
+
+The existence of the surplus labor army being established, there
+remains to be established the economic necessity for the surplus
+labor army. The simplest and most obvious need is that brought
+about by the fluctuation of production. If, when production is at
+low ebb, all men are at work, it necessarily follows that when
+production increases there will be no men to do the increased work.
+This may seem almost childish, and, if not childish, at least easily
+remedied. At low ebb let the men work shorter time; at high flood
+let them work overtime. The main objection to this is, that it is
+not done, and that we are considering what is, not what might be or
+should be.
+
+Then there are great irregular and periodical demands for labor
+which must be met. Under the first head come all the big building
+and engineering enterprises. When a canal is to be dug or a
+railroad put through, requiring thousands of laborers, it would be
+hurtful to withdraw these laborers from the constant industries.
+And whether it is a canal to be dug or a cellar, whether five
+thousand men are required or five, it is well, in society as at
+present organized, that they be taken from the surplus labor army.
+The surplus labor army is the reserve fund of social energy, and
+this is one of the reasons for its existence.
+
+Under the second head, periodical demands, come the harvests.
+Throughout the year, huge labor tides sweep back and forth across
+the United States. That which is sown and tended by few men, comes
+to sudden ripeness and must be gathered by many men; and it is
+inevitable that these many men form floating populations. In the
+late spring the berries must be picked, in the summer the grain
+garnered, in the fall, the hops gathered, in the winter the ice
+harvested. In California a man may pick berries in Siskiyou,
+peaches in Santa Clara, grapes in the San Joaquin, and oranges in
+Los Angeles, going from job to job as the season advances, and
+travelling a thousand miles ere the season is done. But the great
+demand for agricultural labor is in the summer. In the winter, work
+is slack, and these floating populations eddy into the cities to eke
+out a precarious existence and harrow the souls of the police
+officers until the return of warm weather and work. If there were
+constant work at good wages for every man, who would harvest the
+crops?
+
+But the last and most significant need for the surplus labor army
+remains to be stated. This surplus labor acts as a check upon all
+employed labor. It is the lash by which the masters hold the
+workers to their tasks, or drive them back to their tasks when they
+have revolted. It is the goad which forces the workers into the
+compulsory "free contracts" against which they now and again rebel.
+There is only one reason under the sun that strikes fail, and that
+is because there are always plenty of men to take the strikers'
+places.
+
+The strength of the union today, other things remaining equal, is
+proportionate to the skill of the trade, or, in other words,
+proportionate to the pressure the surplus labor army can put upon
+it. If a thousand ditch-diggers strike, it is easy to replace them,
+wherefore the ditch-diggers have little or no organized strength.
+But a thousand highly skilled machinists are somewhat harder to
+replace, and in consequence the machinist unions are strong. The
+ditch-diggers are wholly at the mercy of the surplus labor army, the
+machinists only partly. To be invincible, a union must be a
+monopoly. It must control every man in its particular trade, and
+regulate apprentices so that the supply of skilled workmen may
+remain constant; this is the dream of the "Labor Trust" on the part
+of the captains of labor.
+
+Once, in England, after the Great Plague, labor awoke to find there
+was more work for men than there were men to work. Instead of
+workers competing for favors from employers, employers were
+competing for favors from the workers. Wages went up and up, and
+continued to go up, until the workers demanded the full product of
+their toil. Now it is clear that, when labor receives its full
+product capital must perish. And so the pygmy capitalists of that
+post-Plague day found their existence threatened by this untoward
+condition of affairs. To save themselves, they set a maximum wage,
+restrained the workers from moving about from place to place,
+smashed incipient organization, refused to tolerate idlers, and by
+most barbarous legal penalties punished those who disobeyed. After
+that, things went on as before.
+
+The point of this, of course, is to demonstrate the need of the
+surplus labor army. Without such an army, our present capitalist
+society would be powerless. Labor would organize as it never
+organized before, and the last least worker would be gathered into
+the unions. The full product of toil would be demanded, and
+capitalist society would crumble away. Nor could capitalist society
+save itself as did the post-Plague capitalist society. The time is
+past when a handful of masters, by imprisonment and barbarous
+punishment, can drive the legions of the workers to their tasks.
+Without a surplus labor army, the courts, police, and military are
+impotent. In such matters the function of the courts, police, and
+military is to preserve order, and to fill the places of strikers
+with surplus labor. If there be no surplus labor to instate, there
+is no function to perform; for disorder arises only during the
+process of instatement, when the striking labor army and the surplus
+labor army clash together. That is to say, that which maintains the
+integrity of the present industrial society more potently than the
+courts, police, and military is the surplus labor army.
+
+
+It has been shown that there are more men than there is work for
+men, and that the surplus labor army is an economic necessity. To
+show how the tramp is a by-product of this economic necessity, it is
+necessary to inquire into the composition of the surplus labor army.
+What men form it? Why are they there? What do they do?
+
+In the first place, since the workers must compete for employment,
+it inevitably follows that it is the fit and efficient who find
+employment. The skilled worker holds his place by virtue of his
+skill and efficiency. Were he less skilled, or were he unreliable
+or erratic, he would be swiftly replaced by a stronger competitor.
+The skilled and steady employments are not cumbered with clowns and
+idiots. A man finds his place according to his ability and the
+needs of the system, and those without ability, or incapable of
+satisfying the needs of the system, have no place. Thus, the poor
+telegrapher may develop into an excellent wood-chopper. But if the
+poor telegrapher cherishes the delusion that he is a good
+telegrapher, and at the same time disdains all other employments, he
+will have no employment at all, or he will be so poor at all other
+employments that he will work only now and again in lieu of better
+men. He will be among the first let off when times are dull, and
+among the last taken on when times are good. Or, to the point, he
+will be a member of the surplus labor army.
+
+So the conclusion is reached that the less fit and less efficient,
+or the unfit and inefficient, compose the surplus labor army. Here
+are to be found the men who have tried and failed, the men who
+cannot hold jobs,--the plumber apprentice who could not become a
+journeyman, and the plumber journeyman too clumsy and dull to retain
+employment; switchmen who wreck trains; clerks who cannot balance
+books; blacksmiths who lame horses; lawyers who cannot plead; in
+short, the failures of every trade and profession, and failures,
+many of them, in divers trades and professions. Failure is writ
+large, and in their wretchedness they bear the stamp of social
+disapprobation. Common work, any kind of work, wherever or however
+they can obtain it, is their portion.
+
+But these hereditary inefficients do not alone compose the surplus
+labor army. There are the skilled but unsteady and unreliable men;
+and the old men, once skilled, but, with dwindling powers, no longer
+skilled. {3} And there are good men, too, splendidly skilled and
+efficient, but thrust out of the employment of dying or disaster-
+smitten industries. In this connection it is not out of place to
+note the misfortune of the workers in the British iron trades, who
+are suffering because of American inroads. And, last of all, are
+the unskilled laborers, the hewers of wood and drawers of water, the
+ditch-diggers, the men of pick and shovel, the helpers, lumpers,
+roustabouts. If trade is slack on a seacoast of two thousand miles,
+or the harvests are light in a great interior valley, myriads of
+these laborers lie idle, or make life miserable for their fellows in
+kindred unskilled employments.
+
+A constant filtration goes on in the working world, and good
+material is continually drawn from the surplus labor army. Strikes
+and industrial dislocations shake up the workers, bring good men to
+the surface and sink men as good or not so good. The hope of the
+skilled striker is in that the scabs are less skilled, or less
+capable of becoming skilled; yet each strike attests to the
+efficiency that lurks beneath. After the Pullman strike, a few
+thousand railroad men were chagrined to find the work they had flung
+down taken up by men as good as themselves.
+
+But one thing must be considered here. Under the present system, if
+the weakest and least fit were as strong and fit as the best, and
+the best were correspondingly stronger and fitter, the same
+condition would obtain. There would be the same army of employed
+labor, the same army of surplus labor. The whole thing is relative.
+There is no absolute standard of efficiency.
+
+
+Comes now the tramp. And all conclusions may be anticipated by
+saying at once that he is a tramp because some one has to be a
+tramp. If he left the "road" and became a VERY efficient common
+laborer, some ORDINARILY EFFICIENT common laborer would have to take
+to the "road." The nooks and crannies are crowded by the surplus
+laborers; and when the first snow flies, and the tramps are driven
+into the cities, things become overcrowded and stringent police
+regulations are necessary.
+
+The tramp is one of two kinds of men: he is either a discouraged
+worker or a discouraged criminal. Now a discouraged criminal, on
+investigation, proves to be a discouraged worker, or the descendant
+of discouraged workers; so that, in the last analysis, the tramp is
+a discouraged worker. Since there is not work for all,
+discouragement for some is unavoidable. How, then, does this
+process of discouragement operate?
+
+The lower the employment in the industrial scale, the harder the
+conditions. The finer, the more delicate, the more skilled the
+trade, the higher is it lifted above the struggle. There is less
+pressure, less sordidness, less savagery. There are fewer glass-
+blowers proportionate to the needs of the glass-blowing industry
+than there are ditch-diggers proportionate to the needs of the
+ditch-digging industry. And not only this, for it requires a glass-
+blower to take the place of a striking glass-blower, while any kind
+of a striker or out-of-work can take the place of a ditch-digger.
+So the skilled trades are more independent, have more individuality
+and latitude. They may confer with their masters, make demands,
+assert themselves. The unskilled laborers, on the other hand, have
+no voice in their affairs. The settlement of terms is none of their
+business. "Free contract" is all that remains to them. They may
+take what is offered, or leave it. There are plenty more of their
+kind. They do not count. They are members of the surplus labor
+army, and must be content with a hand-to-mouth existence.
+
+The reward is likewise proportioned. The strong, fit worker in a
+skilled trade, where there is little labor pressure, is well
+compensated. He is a king compared with his less fortunate brothers
+in the unskilled occupations where the labor pressure is great. The
+mediocre worker not only is forced to be idle a large portion of the
+time, but when employed is forced to accept a pittance. A dollar a
+day on some days and nothing on other days will hardly support a man
+and wife and send children to school. And not only do the masters
+bear heavily upon him, and his own kind struggle for the morsel at
+his mouth, but all skilled and organized labor adds to his woe.
+Union men do not scab on one another, but in strikes, or when work
+is slack, it is considered "fair" for them to descend and take away
+the work of the common laborers. And take it away they do; for, as
+a matter of fact, a well-fed, ambitious machinist or a core-maker
+will transiently shovel coal better than an ill-fed, spiritless
+laborer.
+
+Thus there is no encouragement for the unfit, inefficient, and
+mediocre. Their very inefficiency and mediocrity make them helpless
+as cattle and add to their misery. And the whole tendency for such
+is downward, until, at the bottom of the social pit, they are
+wretched, inarticulate beasts, living like beasts, breeding like
+beasts, dying like beasts. And how do they fare, these creatures
+born mediocre, whose heritage is neither brains nor brawn nor
+endurance? They are sweated in the slums in an atmosphere of
+discouragement and despair. There is no strength in weakness, no
+encouragement in foul air, vile food, and dank dens. They are there
+because they are so made that they are not fit to be higher up; but
+filth and obscenity do not strengthen the neck, nor does chronic
+emptiness of belly stiffen the back.
+
+For the mediocre there is no hope. Mediocrity is a sin. Poverty is
+the penalty of failure,--poverty, from whose loins spring the
+criminal and the tramp, both failures, both discouraged workers.
+Poverty is the inferno where ignorance festers and vice corrodes,
+and where the physical, mental, and moral parts of nature are
+aborted and denied.
+
+That the charge of rashness in splashing the picture be not
+incurred, let the following authoritative evidence be considered:
+first, the work and wages of mediocrity and inefficiency, and,
+second, the habitat:
+
+The New York Sun of February 28, 1901, describes the opening of a
+factory in New York City by the American Tobacco Company. Cheroots
+were to be made in this factory in competition with other factories
+which refused to be absorbed by the trust. The trust advertised for
+girls. The crowd of men and boys who wanted work was so great in
+front of the building that the police were forced with their clubs
+to clear them away. The wage paid the girls was $2.50 per week,
+sixty cents of which went for car fare. {4}
+
+Miss Nellie Mason Auten, a graduate student of the department of
+sociology at the University of Chicago, recently made a thorough
+investigation of the garment trades of Chicago. Her figures were
+published in the American Journal of Sociology, and commented upon
+by the Literary Digest. She found women working ten hours a day,
+six days a week, for forty cents per week (a rate of two-thirds of a
+cent an hour). Many women earned less than a dollar a week, and
+none of them worked every week. The following table will best
+summarize Miss Auten's investigations among a portion of the
+garment-workers:
+
+Industry Average Average Average
+ Individual Number of Yearly
+ Weekly Weeks Earnings
+ Wages Employed
+Dressmakers $.90 42. $37.00
+Pants-Finishers 1.31 27.58 42.41
+Housewives and 1.58 30.21 47.49
+Pants-Finishers
+Seamstresses 2.03 32.78 64.10
+Pants-makers 2.13 30.77 75.61
+Miscellaneous 2.77 29. 81.80
+Tailors 6.22 31.96 211.92
+General Averages 2.48 31.18 76.74
+
+Walter A. Wyckoff, who is as great an authority upon the worker as
+Josiah Flynt is on the tramp, furnishes the following Chicago
+experience:
+
+"Many of the men were so weakened by the want and hardship of the
+winter that they were no longer in condition for effective labor.
+Some of the bosses who were in need of added hands were obliged to
+turn men away because of physical incapacity. One instance of this
+I shall not soon forget. It was when I overheard, early one morning
+at a factory gate, an interview between a would-be laborer and the
+boss. I knew the applicant for a Russian Jew, who had at home an
+old mother and a wife and two young children to support. He had had
+intermittent employment throughout the winter in a sweater's den,
+{5} barely enough to keep them all alive, and, after the hardships
+of the cold season, he was again in desperate straits for work.
+
+"The boss had all but agreed to take him on for some sort of
+unskilled labor, when, struck by the cadaverous look of the man, he
+told him to bare his arm. Up went the sleeve of his coat and his
+ragged flannel shirt, exposing a naked arm with the muscles nearly
+gone, and the blue-white transparent skin stretched over sinews and
+the outlines of the bones. Pitiful beyond words was his effort to
+give a semblance of strength to the biceps which rose faintly to the
+upward movement of the forearm. But the boss sent him off with an
+oath and a contemptuous laugh; and I watched the fellow as he turned
+down the street, facing the fact of his starving family with a
+despair at his heart which only mortal man can feel and no mortal
+tongue can speak."
+
+Concerning habitat, Mr. Jacob Riis has stated that in New York City,
+in the block bounded by Stanton, Houston, Attorney, and Ridge
+streets, the size of which is 200 by 300, there is a warren of 2244
+human beings.
+
+In the block bounded by Sixty-first and Sixty-second streets, and
+Amsterdam and West End avenues, are over four thousand human
+creatures,--quite a comfortable New England village to crowd into
+one city block.
+
+The Rev. Dr. Behrends, speaking of the block bounded by Canal,
+Hester, Eldridge, and Forsyth streets, says: "In a room 12 by 8 and
+5.5 feet high, it was found that nine persons slept and prepared
+their food. . . . In another room, located in a dark cellar, without
+screens or partitions, were together two men with their wives and a
+girl of fourteen, two single men and a boy of seventeen, two women
+and four boys,--nine, ten, eleven, and fifteen years old,--fourteen
+persons in all."
+
+Here humanity rots. Its victims, with grim humor, call it "tenant-
+house rot." Or, as a legislative report puts it: "Here infantile
+life unfolds its bud, but perishes before its first anniversary.
+Here youth is ugly with loathsome disease, and the deformities which
+follow physical degeneration."
+
+These are the men and women who are what they are because they were
+not better born, or because they happened to be unluckily born in
+time and space. Gauged by the needs of the system, they are weak
+and worthless. The hospital and the pauper's grave await them, and
+they offer no encouragement to the mediocre worker who has failed
+higher up in the industrial structure. Such a worker, conscious
+that he has failed, conscious from the hard fact that he cannot
+obtain work in the higher employments, finds several courses open to
+him. He may come down and be a beast in the social pit, for
+instance; but if he be of a certain caliber, the effect of the
+social pit will be to discourage him from work. In his blood a
+rebellion will quicken, and he will elect to become either a felon
+or a tramp.
+
+If he have fought the hard fight he is not unacquainted with the
+lure of the "road." When out of work and still undiscouraged, he
+has been forced to "hit the road" between large cities in his quest
+for a job. He has loafed, seen the country and green things,
+laughed in joy, lain on his back and listened to the birds singing
+overhead, unannoyed by factory whistles and bosses' harsh commands;
+and, most significant of all, HE HAS LIVED! That is the point! He
+has not starved to death. Not only has he been care-free and happy,
+but he has lived! And from the knowledge that he has idled and is
+still alive, he achieves a new outlook on life; and the more he
+experiences the unenviable lot of the poor worker, the more the
+blandishments of the "road" take hold of him. And finally he flings
+his challenge in the face of society, imposes a valorous boycott on
+all work, and joins the far-wanderers of Hoboland, the gypsy folk of
+this latter day.
+
+But the tramp does not usually come from the slums. His place of
+birth is ordinarily a bit above, and sometimes a very great bit
+above. A confessed failure, he yet refuses to accept the
+punishment, and swerves aside from the slum to vagabondage. The
+average beast in the social pit is either too much of a beast, or
+too much of a slave to the bourgeois ethics and ideals of his
+masters, to manifest this flicker of rebellion. But the social pit,
+out of its discouragement and viciousness, breeds criminals, men who
+prefer being beasts of prey to being beasts of work. And the
+mediocre criminal, in turn, the unfit and inefficient criminal, is
+discouraged by the strong arm of the law and goes over to trampdom.
+
+These men, the discouraged worker and the discouraged criminal,
+voluntarily withdraw themselves from the struggle for work.
+Industry does not need them. There are no factories shut down
+through lack of labor, no projected railroads unbuilt for want of
+pick-and-shovel men. Women are still glad to toil for a dollar a
+week, and men and boys to clamor and fight for work at the factory
+gates. No one misses these discouraged men, and in going away they
+have made it somewhat easier for those that remain.
+
+
+So the case stands thus: There being more men than there is work
+for men to do, a surplus labor army inevitably results. The surplus
+labor army is an economic necessity; without it, present society
+would fall to pieces. Into the surplus labor army are herded the
+mediocre, the inefficient, the unfit, and those incapable of
+satisfying the industrial needs of the system. The struggle for
+work between the members of the surplus labor army is sordid and
+savage, and at the bottom of the social pit the struggle is vicious
+and beastly. This struggle tends to discouragement, and the victims
+of this discouragement are the criminal and the tramp. The tramp is
+not an economic necessity such as the surplus labor army, but he is
+the by-product of an economic necessity.
+
+The "road" is one of the safety-valves through which the waste of
+the social organism is given off. And BEING GIVEN OFF constitutes
+the negative function of the tramp. Society, as at present
+organized, makes much waste of human life. This waste must be
+eliminated. Chloroform or electrocution would be a simple, merciful
+solution of this problem of elimination; but the ruling ethics,
+while permitting the human waste, will not permit a humane
+elimination of that waste. This paradox demonstrates the
+irreconcilability of theoretical ethics and industrial need.
+
+And so the tramp becomes self-eliminating. And not only self!
+Since he is manifestly unfit for things as they are, and since kind
+is prone to beget kind, it is necessary that his kind cease with
+him, that his progeny shall not be, that he play the eunuch's part
+in this twentieth century after Christ. And he plays it. He does
+not breed. Sterility is his portion, as it is the portion of the
+woman on the street. They might have been mates, but society has
+decreed otherwise.
+
+And, while it is not nice that these men should die, it is ordained
+that they must die, and we should not quarrel with them if they
+cumber our highways and kitchen stoops with their perambulating
+carcasses. This is a form of elimination we not only countenance
+but compel. Therefore let us be cheerful and honest about it. Let
+us be as stringent as we please with our police regulations, but for
+goodness' sake let us refrain from telling the tramp to go to work.
+Not only is it unkind, but it is untrue and hypocritical. We know
+there is no work for him. As the scapegoat to our economic and
+industrial sinning, or to the plan of things, if you will, we should
+give him credit. Let us be just. He is so made. Society made him.
+He did not make himself.
+
+
+
+THE SCAB
+
+
+
+In a competitive society, where men struggle with one another for
+food and shelter, what is more natural than that generosity, when it
+diminishes the food and shelter of men other than he who is
+generous, should be held an accursed thing? Wise old saws to the
+contrary, he who takes from a man's purse takes from his existence.
+To strike at a man's food and shelter is to strike at his life; and
+in a society organized on a tooth-and-nail basis, such an act,
+performed though it may be under the guise of generosity, is none
+the less menacing and terrible.
+
+It is for this reason that a laborer is so fiercely hostile to
+another laborer who offers to work for less pay or longer hours. To
+hold his place, (which is to live), he must offset this offer by
+another equally liberal, which is equivalent to giving away somewhat
+from the food and shelter he enjoys. To sell his day's work for $2,
+instead of $2.50, means that he, his wife, and his children will not
+have so good a roof over their heads, so warm clothes on their
+backs, so substantial food in their stomachs. Meat will be bought
+less frequently and it will be tougher and less nutritious, stout
+new shoes will go less often on the children's feet, and disease and
+death will be more imminent in a cheaper house and neighborhood.
+
+Thus the generous laborer, giving more of a day's work for less
+return, (measured in terms of food and shelter), threatens the life
+of his less generous brother laborer, and at the best, if he does
+not destroy that life, he diminishes it. Whereupon the less
+generous laborer looks upon him as an enemy, and, as men are
+inclined to do in a tooth-and-nail society, he tries to kill the man
+who is trying to kill him.
+
+When a striker kills with a brick the man who has taken his place,
+he has no sense of wrong-doing. In the deepest holds of his being,
+though he does not reason the impulse, he has an ethical sanction.
+He feels dimly that he has justification, just as the home-defending
+Boer felt, though more sharply, with each bullet he fired at the
+invading English. Behind every brick thrown by a striker is the
+selfish will "to live" of himself, and the slightly altruistic will
+"to live" of his family. The family group came into the world
+before the State group, and society, being still on the primitive
+basis of tooth and nail, the will "to live" of the State is not so
+compelling to the striker as is the will "to live" of his family and
+himself.
+
+In addition to the use of bricks, clubs, and bullets, the selfish
+laborer finds it necessary to express his feelings in speech. Just
+as the peaceful country-dweller calls the sea-rover a "pirate," and
+the stout burgher calls the man who breaks into his strong-box a
+"robber," so the selfish laborer applies the opprobrious epithet a
+"scab" to the laborer who takes from him food and shelter by being
+more generous in the disposal of his labor power. The sentimental
+connotation of "scab" is as terrific as that of "traitor" or
+"Judas," and a sentimental definition would be as deep and varied as
+the human heart. It is far easier to arrive at what may be called a
+technical definition, worded in commercial terms, as, for instance,
+that A SCAB IS ONE WHO GIVES MORE VALUE FOR THE SAME PRICE THAN
+ANOTHER.
+
+The laborer who gives more time or strength or skill for the same
+wage than another, or equal time or strength or skill for a less
+wage, is a scab. This generousness on his part is hurtful to his
+fellow-laborers, for it compels them to an equal generousness which
+is not to their liking, and which gives them less of food and
+shelter. But a word may be said for the scab. Just as his act
+makes his rivals compulsorily generous, so do they, by fortune of
+birth and training, make compulsory his act of generousness. He
+does not scab because he wants to scab. No whim of the spirit, no
+burgeoning of the heart, leads him to give more of his labor power
+than they for a certain sum.
+
+It is because he cannot get work on the same terms as they that he
+is a scab. There is less work than there are men to do work. This
+is patent, else the scab would not loom so large on the labor-market
+horizon. Because they are stronger than he, or more skilled, or
+more energetic, it is impossible for him to take their places at the
+same wage. To take their places he must give more value, must work
+longer hours or receive a smaller wage. He does so, and he cannot
+help it, for his will "to live" is driving him on as well as they
+are being driven on by their will "to live"; and to live he must win
+food and shelter, which he can do only by receiving permission to
+work from some man who owns a bit of land or a piece of machinery.
+And to receive permission from this man, he must make the
+transaction profitable for him.
+
+Viewed in this light, the scab, who gives more labor power for a
+certain price than his fellows, is not so generous after all. He is
+no more generous with his energy than the chattel slave and the
+convict laborer, who, by the way, are the almost perfect scabs.
+They give their labor power for about the minimum possible price.
+But, within limits, they may loaf and malinger, and, as scabs, are
+exceeded by the machine, which never loafs and malingers and which
+is the ideally perfect scab.
+
+It is not nice to be a scab. Not only is it not in good social
+taste and comradeship, but, from the standpoint of food and shelter,
+it is bad business policy. Nobody desires to scab, to give most for
+least. The ambition of every individual is quite the opposite, to
+give least for most; and, as a result, living in a tooth-and-nail
+society, battle royal is waged by the ambitious individuals. But in
+its most salient aspect, that of the struggle over the division of
+the joint product, it is no longer a battle between individuals, but
+between groups of individuals. Capital and labor apply themselves
+to raw material, make something useful out of it, add to its value,
+and then proceed to quarrel over the division of the added value.
+Neither cares to give most for least. Each is intent on giving less
+than the other and on receiving more.
+
+Labor combines into its unions, capital into partnerships,
+associations, corporations, and trusts. A group-struggle is the
+result, in which the individuals, as individuals, play no part. The
+Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners, for instance, serves notice
+on the Master Builders' Association that it demands an increase of
+the wage of its members from $3.50 a day to $4, and a Saturday half-
+holiday without pay. This means that the carpenters are trying to
+give less for more. Where they received $21 for six full days, they
+are endeavoring to get $22 for five days and a half,--that is, they
+will work half a day less each week and receive a dollar more.
+
+Also, they expect the Saturday half-holiday to give work to one
+additional man for each eleven previously employed. This last
+affords a splendid example of the development of the group idea. In
+this particular struggle the individual has no chance at all for
+life. The individual carpenter would be crushed like a mote by the
+Master Builders' Association, and like a mote the individual master
+builder would be crushed by the Brotherhood of Carpenters and
+Joiners.
+
+In the group-struggle over the division of the joint product, labor
+utilizes the union with its two great weapons, the strike and the
+boycott; while capital utilizes the trust and the association, the
+weapons of which are the black-list, the lockout, and the scab. The
+scab is by far the most formidable weapon of the three. He is the
+man who breaks strikes and causes all the trouble. Without him
+there would be no trouble, for the strikers are willing to remain
+out peacefully and indefinitely so long as other men are not in
+their places, and so long as the particular aggregation of capital
+with which they are fighting is eating its head off in enforced
+idleness.
+
+But both warring groups have reserve weapons. Were it not for the
+scab, these weapons would not be brought into play. But the scab
+takes the place of the striker, who begins at once to wield a most
+powerful weapon, terrorism. The will "to live" of the scab recoils
+from the menace of broken bones and violent death. With all due
+respect to the labor leaders, who are not to be blamed for volubly
+asseverating otherwise, terrorism is a well-defined and eminently
+successful policy of the labor unions. It has probably won them
+more strikes than all the rest of the weapons in their arsenal.
+This terrorism, however, must be clearly understood. It is directed
+solely against the scab, placing him in such fear for life and limb
+as to drive him out of the contest. But when terrorism gets out of
+hand and inoffensive non-combatants are injured, law and order
+threatened, and property destroyed, it becomes an edged tool that
+cuts both ways. This sort of terrorism is sincerely deplored by the
+labor leaders, for it has probably lost them as many strikes as have
+been lost by any other single cause.
+
+The scab is powerless under terrorism. As a rule, he is not so good
+nor gritty a man as the men he is displacing, and he lacks their
+fighting organization. He stands in dire need of stiffening and
+backing. His employers, the capitalists, draw their two remaining
+weapons, the ownership of which is debatable, but which they for the
+time being happen to control. These two weapons may be called the
+political and judicial machinery of society. When the scab crumples
+up and is ready to go down before the fists, bricks, and bullets of
+the labor group, the capitalist group puts the police and soldiers
+into the field, and begins a general bombardment of injunctions.
+Victory usually follows, for the labor group cannot withstand the
+combined assault of gatling guns and injunctions.
+
+But it has been noted that the ownership of the political and
+judicial machinery of society is debatable. In the Titanic struggle
+over the division of the joint product, each group reaches out for
+every available weapon. Nor are they blinded by the smoke of
+conflict. They fight their battles as coolly and collectedly as
+ever battles were fought on paper. The capitalist group has long
+since realized the immense importance of controlling the political
+and judicial machinery of society.
+
+Taught by gatlings and injunctions, which have smashed many an
+otherwise successful strike, the labor group is beginning to realize
+that it all depends upon who is behind and who is before the
+gatlings and the injunctions. And he who knows the labor movement
+knows that there is slowly growing up and being formulated a clear
+and definite policy for the capture of the political and judicial
+machinery.
+
+This is the terrible spectre which Mr. John Graham Brooks sees
+looming portentously over the twentieth century world. No man may
+boast a more intimate knowledge of the labor movement than he; and
+he reiterates again and again the dangerous likelihood of the whole
+labor group capturing the political machinery of society. As he
+says in his recent book: {6} "It is not probable that employers can
+destroy unionism in the United States. Adroit and desperate
+attempts will, however, be made, if we mean by unionism the
+undisciplined and aggressive fact of vigorous and determined
+organizations. If capital should prove too strong in this struggle,
+the result is easy to predict. The employers have only to convince
+organized labor that it cannot hold its own against the capitalist
+manager, and the whole energy that now goes to the union will turn
+to an aggressive political socialism. It will not be the harmless
+sympathy with increased city and state functions which trade unions
+already feel; it will become a turbulent political force bent upon
+using every weapon of taxation against the rich."
+
+This struggle not to be a scab, to avoid giving more for less and to
+succeed in giving less for more, is more vital than it would appear
+on the surface. The capitalist and labor groups are locked together
+in desperate battle, and neither side is swayed by moral
+considerations more than skin-deep. The labor group hires business
+agents, lawyers, and organizers, and is beginning to intimidate
+legislators by the strength of its solid vote; and more directly, in
+the near future, it will attempt to control legislation by capturing
+it bodily through the ballot-box. On the other hand, the capitalist
+group, numerically weaker, hires newspapers, universities, and
+legislatures, and strives to bend to its need all the forces which
+go to mould public opinion.
+
+The only honest morality displayed by either side is white-hot
+indignation at the iniquities of the other side. The striking
+teamster complacently takes a scab driver into an alley, and with an
+iron bar breaks his arms, so that he can drive no more, but cries
+out to high Heaven for justice when the capitalist breaks his skull
+by means of a club in the hands of a policeman. Nay, the members of
+a union will declaim in impassioned rhetoric for the God-given right
+of an eight-hour day, and at the time be working their own business
+agent seventeen hours out of the twenty-four.
+
+A capitalist such as Collis P. Huntington, and his name is Legion,
+after a long life spent in buying the aid of countless legislatures,
+will wax virtuously wrathful, and condemn in unmeasured terms "the
+dangerous tendency of crying out to the Government for aid" in the
+way of labor legislation. Without a quiver, a member of the
+capitalist group will run tens of thousands of pitiful child-
+laborers through his life-destroying cotton factories, and weep
+maudlin and constitutional tears over one scab hit in the back with
+a brick. He will drive a "compulsory" free contract with an
+unorganized laborer on the basis of a starvation wage, saying, "Take
+it or leave it," knowing that to leave it means to die of hunger,
+and in the next breath, when the organizer entices that laborer into
+a union, will storm patriotically about the inalienable right of all
+men to work. In short, the chief moral concern of either side is
+with the morals of the other side. They are not in the business for
+their moral welfare, but to achieve the enviable position of the
+non-scab who gets more than he gives.
+
+But there is more to the question than has yet been discussed. The
+labor scab is no more detestable to his brother laborers than is the
+capitalist scab to his brother capitalists. A capitalist may get
+most for least in dealing with his laborers, and in so far be a non-
+scab; but at the same time, in his dealings with his fellow-
+capitalists, he may give most for least and be the very worst kind
+of scab. The most heinous crime an employer of labor can commit is
+to scab on his fellow-employers of labor. Just as the individual
+laborers have organized into groups to protect themselves from the
+peril of the scab laborer, so have the employers organized into
+groups to protect themselves from the peril of the scab employer.
+The employers' federations, associations, and trusts are nothing
+more nor less than unions. They are organized to destroy scabbing
+amongst themselves and to encourage scabbing amongst others. For
+this reason they pool interests, determine prices, and present an
+unbroken and aggressive front to the labor group.
+
+As has been said before, nobody likes to play the compulsorily
+generous role of scab. It is a bad business proposition on the face
+of it. And it is patent that there would be no capitalist scabs if
+there were not more capital than there is work for capital to do.
+When there are enough factories in existence to supply, with
+occasional stoppages, a certain commodity, the building of new
+factories by a rival concern, for the production of that commodity,
+is plain advertisement that that capital is out of a job. The first
+act of this new aggregation of capital will be to cut prices, to
+give more for less,--in short to scab, to strike at the very
+existence of the less generous aggregation of capital the work of
+which it is trying to do.
+
+No scab capitalist strives to give more for less for any other
+reason than that he hopes, by undercutting a competitor and driving
+that competitor out of the market, to get that market and its
+profits for himself. His ambition is to achieve the day when he
+shall stand alone in the field both as buyer and seller,--when he
+will be the royal non-scab, buying most for least, selling least for
+most, and reducing all about him, the small buyers and sellers, (the
+consumers and the laborers), to a general condition of scabdom.
+This, for example, has been the history of Mr. Rockefeller and the
+Standard Oil Company. Through all the sordid villanies of scabdom
+he has passed, until today he is a most regal non-scab. However, to
+continue in this enviable position, he must be prepared at a
+moment's notice to go scabbing again. And he is prepared. Whenever
+a competitor arises, Mr. Rockefeller changes about from giving least
+for most and gives most for least with such a vengeance as to drive
+the competitor out of existence.
+
+The banded capitalists discriminate against a scab capitalist by
+refusing him trade advantages, and by combining against him in most
+relentless fashion. The banded laborers, discriminating against a
+scab laborer in more primitive fashion, with a club, are no more
+merciless than the banded capitalists.
+
+Mr. Casson tells of a New York capitalist who withdrew from the
+Sugar Union several years ago and became a scab. He was worth
+something like twenty millions of dollars. But the Sugar Union,
+standing shoulder to shoulder with the Railroad Union and several
+other unions, beat him to his knees till he cried, "Enough." So
+frightfully did they beat him that he was obliged to turn over to
+his creditors his home, his chickens, and his gold watch. In point
+of fact, he was as thoroughly bludgeoned by the Federation of
+Capitalist Unions as ever scab workman was bludgeoned by a labor
+union. The intent in either case is the same,--to destroy the
+scab's producing power. The labor scab with concussion of the brain
+is put out of business, and so is the capitalist scab who has lost
+all his dollars down to his chickens and his watch.
+
+But the role of scab passes beyond the individual. Just as
+individuals scab on other individuals, so do groups scab on other
+groups. And the principle involved is precisely the same as in the
+case of the simple labor scab. A group, in the nature of its
+organization, is often compelled to give most for least, and, so
+doing, to strike at the life of another group. At the present
+moment all Europe is appalled by that colossal scab, the United
+States. And Europe is clamorous with agitation for a Federation of
+National Unions to protect her from the United States. It may be
+remarked, in passing, that in its prime essentials this agitation in
+no wise differs from the trade-union agitation among workmen in any
+industry. The trouble is caused by the scab who is giving most for
+least. The result of the American scab's nefarious actions will be
+to strike at the food and shelter of Europe. The way for Europe to
+protect herself is to quit bickering among her parts and to form a
+union against the scab. And if the union is formed, armies and
+navies may be expected to be brought into play in fashion similar to
+the bricks and clubs in ordinary labor struggles.
+
+In this connection, and as one of many walking delegates for the
+nations, M. Leroy-Beaulieu, the noted French economist, may well be
+quoted. In a letter to the Vienna Tageblatt, he advocates an
+economic alliance among the Continental nations for the purpose of
+barring out American goods, an economic alliance, in his own
+language, "WHICH MAY POSSIBLY AND DESIRABLY DEVELOP INTO A POLITICAL
+ALLIANCE."
+
+It will be noted, in the utterances of the Continental walking
+delegates, that, one and all, they leave England out of the proposed
+union. And in England herself the feeling is growing that her days
+are numbered if she cannot unite for offence and defence with the
+great American scab. As Andrew Carnegie said some time ago, "The
+only course for Great Britain seems to be reunion with her
+grandchild or sure decline to a secondary place, and then to
+comparative insignificance in the future annals of the English-
+speaking race."
+
+Cecil Rhodes, speaking of what would have obtained but for the pig-
+headedness of George III, and of what will obtain when England and
+the United States are united, said, "NO CANNON WOULD. . . BE FIRED
+ON EITHER HEMISPHERE BUT BY PERMISSION OF THE ENGLISH RACE." It
+would seem that England, fronted by the hostile Continental Union
+and flanked by the great American scab, has nothing left but to join
+with the scab and play the historic labor role of armed Pinkerton.
+Granting the words of Cecil Rhodes, the United States would be
+enabled to scab without let or hindrance on Europe, while England,
+as professional strike-breaker and policeman, destroyed the unions
+and kept order.
+
+All this may appear fantastic and erroneous, but there is in it a
+soul of truth vastly more significant than it may seem.
+Civilization may be expressed today in terms of trade-unionism.
+Individual struggles have largely passed away, but group-struggles
+increase prodigiously. And the things for which the groups struggle
+are the same as of old. Shorn of all subtleties and complexities,
+the chief struggle of men, and of groups of men, is for food and
+shelter. And, as of old they struggled with tooth and nail, so
+today they struggle with teeth and nails elongated into armies and
+navies, machines, and economic advantages.
+
+Under the definition that a scab is ONE WHO GIVES MORE VALUE FOR THE
+SAME PRICE THAN ANOTHER, it would seem that society can be generally
+divided into the two classes of the scabs and the non-scabs. But on
+closer investigation, however, it will be seen that the non-scab is
+a vanishing quantity. In the social jungle, everybody is preying
+upon everybody else. As in the case of Mr. Rockefeller, he who was
+a scab yesterday is a non-scab today, and tomorrow may be a scab
+again.
+
+The woman stenographer or book-keeper who receives forty dollars per
+month where a man was receiving seventy-five is a scab. So is the
+woman who does a man's work at a weaving-machine, and the child who
+goes into the mill or factory. And the father, who is scabbed out
+of work by the wives and children of other men, sends his own wife
+and children to scab in order to save himself.
+
+When a publisher offers an author better royalties than other
+publishers have been paying him, he is scabbing on those other
+publishers. The reporter on a newspaper, who feels he should be
+receiving a larger salary for his work, says so, and is shown the
+door, is replaced by a reporter who is a scab; whereupon, when the
+belly-need presses, the displaced reporter goes to another paper and
+scabs himself. The minister who hardens his heart to a call, and
+waits for a certain congregation to offer him say $500 a year more,
+often finds himself scabbed upon by another and more impecunious
+minister; and the next time it is HIS turn to scab while a brother
+minister is hardening his heart to a call. The scab is everywhere.
+The professional strike-breakers, who as a class receive large
+wages, will scab on one another, while scab unions are even formed
+to prevent scabbing upon scabs.
+
+There are non-scabs, but they are usually born so, and are protected
+by the whole might of society in the possession of their food and
+shelter. King Edward is such a type, as are all individuals who
+receive hereditary food-and-shelter privileges,--such as the present
+Duke of Bedford, for instance, who yearly receives $75,000 from the
+good people of London because some former king gave some former
+ancestor of his the market privileges of Covent Garden. The
+irresponsible rich are likewise non-scabs,--and by them is meant
+that coupon-clipping class which hires its managers and brains to
+invest the money usually left it by its ancestors.
+
+Outside these lucky creatures, all the rest, at one time or another
+in their lives, are scabs, at one time or another are engaged in
+giving more for a certain price than any one else. The meek
+professor in some endowed institution, by his meek suppression of
+his convictions, is giving more for his salary than gave the other
+and more outspoken professor whose chair he occupies. And when a
+political party dangles a full dinner-pail in the eyes of the
+toiling masses, it is offering more for a vote than the dubious
+dollar of the opposing party. Even a money-lender is not above
+taking a slightly lower rate of interest and saying nothing about
+it.
+
+Such is the tangle of conflicting interests in a tooth-and-nail
+society that people cannot avoid being scabs, are often made so
+against their desires, and are often unconsciously made so. When
+several trades in a certain locality demand and receive an advance
+in wages, they are unwittingly making scabs of their fellow-laborers
+in that district who have received no advance in wages. In San
+Francisco the barbers, laundry-workers, and milk-wagon drivers
+received such an advance in wages. Their employers promptly added
+the amount of this advance to the selling price of their wares. The
+price of shaves, of washing, and of milk went up. This reduced the
+purchasing power of the unorganized laborers, and, in point of fact,
+reduced their wages and made them greater scabs.
+
+Because the British laborer is disinclined to scab,--that is,
+because he restricts his output in order to give less for the wage
+he receives,--it is to a certain extent made possible for the
+American capitalist, who receives a less restricted output from his
+laborers, to play the scab on the English capitalist. As a result
+of this, (of course combined with other causes), the American
+capitalist and the American laborer are striking at the food and
+shelter of the English capitalist and laborer.
+
+The English laborer is starving today because, among other things,
+he is not a scab. He practises the policy of "ca' canny," which may
+be defined as "go easy." In order to get most for least, in many
+trades he performs but from one-fourth to one-sixth of the labor he
+is well able to perform. An instance of this is found in the
+building of the Westinghouse Electric Works at Manchester. The
+British limit per man was 400 bricks per day. The Westinghouse
+Company imported a "driving" American contractor, aided by half a
+dozen "driving" American foremen, and the British bricklayer swiftly
+attained an average of 1800 bricks per day, with a maximum of 2500
+bricks for the plainest work.
+
+But, the British laborer's policy of "ca' canny," which is the very
+honorable one of giving least for most, and which is likewise the
+policy of the English capitalist, is nevertheless frowned upon by
+the English capitalist, whose business existence is threatened by
+the great American scab. From the rise of the factory system, the
+English capitalist gladly embraced the opportunity, wherever he
+found it, of giving least for most. He did it all over the world
+whenever he enjoyed a market monopoly, and he did it at home with
+the laborers employed in his mills, destroying them like flies till
+prevented, within limits, by the passage of the Factory Acts. Some
+of the proudest fortunes of England today may trace their origin to
+the giving of least for most to the miserable slaves of the factory
+towns. But at the present time the English capitalist is outraged
+because his laborers are employing against him precisely the same
+policy he employed against them, and which he would employ again did
+the chance present itself.
+
+Yet "ca' canny" is a disastrous thing to the British laborer. It
+has driven ship-building from England to Scotland, bottle-making
+from Scotland to Belgium, flint-glass-making from England to
+Germany, and today is steadily driving industry after industry to
+other countries. A correspondent from Northampton wrote not long
+ago: "Factories are working half and third time. . . . There is no
+strike, there is no real labor trouble, but the masters and men are
+alike suffering from sheer lack of employment. Markets which were
+once theirs are now American." It would seem that the unfortunate
+British laborer is 'twixt the devil and the deep sea. If he gives
+most for least, he faces a frightful slavery such as marked the
+beginning of the factory system. If he gives least for most, he
+drives industry away to other countries and has no work at all.
+
+But the union laborers of the United States have nothing of which to
+boast, while, according to their trade-union ethics, they have a
+great deal of which to be ashamed. They passionately preach short
+hours and big wages, the shorter the hours and the bigger the wages
+the better. Their hatred for a scab is as terrible as the hatred of
+a patriot for a traitor, of a Christian for a Judas. And in the
+face of all this, they are as colossal scabs as the United States is
+a colossal scab. For all of their boasted unions and high labor
+ideals, they are about the most thoroughgoing scabs on the planet.
+
+Receiving $4.50 per day, because of his proficiency and immense
+working power, the American laborer has been known to scab upon
+scabs (so called) who took his place and received only $0.90 per day
+for a longer day. In this particular instance, five Chinese
+coolies, working longer hours, gave less value for the price
+received from their employer than did one American laborer.
+
+It is upon his brother laborers overseas that the American laborer
+most outrageously scabs. As Mr. Casson has shown, an English nail-
+maker gets $3 per week, while an American nail-maker gets $30. But
+the English worker turns out 200 pounds of nails per week, while the
+American turns out 5500 pounds. If he were as "fair" as his English
+brother, other things being equal, he would be receiving, at the
+English worker's rate of pay, $82.50. As it is, he is scabbing upon
+his English brother to the tune of $79.50 per week. Dr. Schultze-
+Gaevernitz has shown that a German weaver produces 466 yards of
+cotton a week at a cost of .303 per yard, while an American weaver
+produces 1200 yards at a cost of .02 per yard.
+
+But, it may be objected, a great part of this is due to the more
+improved American machinery. Very true, but none the less a great
+part is still due to the superior energy, skill, and willingness of
+the American laborer. The English laborer is faithful to the policy
+of "ca' canny." He refuses point-blank to get the work out of a
+machine that the New World scab gets out of a machine. Mr. Maxim,
+observing a wasteful hand-labor process in his English factory,
+invented a machine which he proved capable of displacing several
+men. But workman after workman was put at the machine, and without
+exception they turned out neither more nor less than a workman
+turned out by hand. They obeyed the mandate of the union and went
+easy, while Mr. Maxim gave up in despair. Nor will the British
+workman run machines at as high speed as the American, nor will he
+run so many. An American workman will "give equal attention
+simultaneously to three, four, or six machines or tools, while the
+British workman is compelled by his trade union to limit his
+attention to one, so that employment may be given to half a dozen
+men."
+
+But for scabbing, no blame attaches itself anywhere. With rare
+exceptions, all the people in the world are scabs. The strong,
+capable workman gets a job and holds it because of his strength and
+capacity. And he holds it because out of his strength and capacity
+he gives a better value for his wage than does the weaker and less
+capable workman. Therefore he is scabbing upon his weaker and less
+capable brother workman. He is giving more value for the price paid
+by the employer.
+
+The superior workman scabs upon the inferior workman because he is
+so constituted and cannot help it. The one, by fortune of birth and
+upbringing, is strong and capable; the other, by fortune of birth
+and upbringing, is not so strong nor capable. It is for the same
+reason that one country scabs upon another. That country which has
+the good fortune to possess great natural resources, a finer sun and
+soil, unhampering institutions, and a deft and intelligent labor
+class and capitalist class is bound to scab upon a country less
+fortunately situated. It is the good fortune of the United States
+that is making her the colossal scab, just as it is the good fortune
+of one man to be born with a straight back while his brother is born
+with a hump.
+
+It is not good to give most for least, not good to be a scab. The
+word has gained universal opprobrium. On the other hand, to be a
+non-scab, to give least for most, is universally branded as stingy,
+selfish, and unchristian-like. So all the world, like the British
+workman, is 'twixt the devil and the deep sea. It is treason to
+one's fellows to scab, it is unchristian-like not to scab.
+
+Since to give least for most, and to give most for least, are
+universally bad, what remains? Equity remains, which is to give
+like for like, the same for the same, neither more nor less. But
+this equity, society, as at present constituted, cannot give. It is
+not in the nature of present-day society for men to give like for
+like, the same for the same. And so long as men continue to live in
+this competitive society, struggling tooth and nail with one another
+for food and shelter, (which is to struggle tooth and nail with one
+another for life), that long will the scab continue to exist. His
+will "to live" will force him to exist. He may be flouted and
+jeered by his brothers, he may be beaten with bricks and clubs by
+the men who by superior strength and capacity scab upon him as he
+scabs upon them by longer hours and smaller wages, but through it
+all he will persist, giving a bit more of most for least than they
+are giving.
+
+
+
+THE QUESTION OF THE MAXIMUM
+
+
+
+For any social movement or development there must be a maximum limit
+beyond which it cannot proceed. That civilization which does not
+advance must decline, and so, when the maximum of development has
+been reached in any given direction, society must either retrograde
+or change the direction of its advance. There are many families of
+men that have failed, in the critical period of their economic
+evolution, to effect a change in direction, and were forced to fall
+back. Vanquished at the moment of their maximum, they have dropped
+out of the whirl of the world. There was no room for them.
+Stronger competitors have taken their places, and they have either
+rotted into oblivion or remain to be crushed under the iron heel of
+the dominant races in as remorseless a struggle as the world has yet
+witnessed. But in this struggle fair women and chivalrous men will
+play no part. Types and ideals have changed. Helens and Launcelots
+are anachronisms. Blows will be given and taken, and men fight and
+die, but not for faiths and altars. Shrines will be desecrated, but
+they will be the shrines, not of temples, but market-places.
+Prophets will arise, but they will be the prophets of prices and
+products. Battles will be waged, not for honor and glory, nor for
+thrones and sceptres, but for dollars and cents and for marts and
+exchanges. Brain and not brawn will endure, and the captains of war
+will be commanded by the captains of industry. In short, it will be
+a contest for the mastery of the world's commerce and for industrial
+supremacy.
+
+It is more significant, this struggle into which we have plunged,
+for the fact that it is the first struggle to involve the globe. No
+general movement of man has been so wide-spreading, so far-reaching.
+Quite local was the supremacy of any ancient people; likewise the
+rise to empire of Macedonia and Rome, the waves of Arabian valor and
+fanaticism, and the mediaeval crusades to the Holy Sepulchre. But
+since those times the planet has undergone a unique shrinkage.
+
+The world of Homer, limited by the coast-lines of the Mediterranean
+and Black seas, was a far vaster world than ours of today, which we
+weigh, measure, and compute as accurately and as easily as if it
+were a child's play-ball. Steam has made its parts accessible and
+drawn them closer together. The telegraph annihilates space and
+time. Each morning, every part knows what every other part is
+thinking, contemplating, or doing. A discovery in a German
+laboratory is being demonstrated in San Francisco within twenty-four
+hours. A book written in South Africa is published by simultaneous
+copyright in every English-speaking country, and on the day
+following is in the hands of the translators. The death of an
+obscure missionary in China, or of a whiskey-smuggler in the South
+Seas, is served, the world over, with the morning toast. The wheat
+output of Argentine or the gold of Klondike are known wherever men
+meet and trade. Shrinkage, or centralization, has become such that
+the humblest clerk in any metropolis may place his hand on the pulse
+of the world. The planet has indeed grown very small; and because
+of this, no vital movement can remain in the clime or country where
+it takes its rise.
+
+And so today the economic and industrial impulse is world-wide. It
+is a matter of import to every people. None may be careless of it.
+To do so is to perish. It is become a battle, the fruits of which
+are to the strong, and to none but the strongest of the strong. As
+the movement approaches its maximum, centralization accelerates and
+competition grows keener and closer. The competitor nations cannot
+all succeed. So long as the movement continues its present
+direction, not only will there not be room for all, but the room
+that is will become less and less; and when the moment of the
+maximum is at hand, there will be no room at all. Capitalistic
+production will have overreached itself, and a change of direction
+will then be inevitable.
+
+Divers queries arise: What is the maximum of commercial development
+the world can sustain? How far can it be exploited? How much
+capital is necessary? Can sufficient capital be accumulated? A
+brief resume of the industrial history of the last one hundred years
+or so will be relevant at this stage of the discussion.
+Capitalistic production, in its modern significance, was born of the
+industrial revolution in England in the latter half of the
+eighteenth century. The great inventions of that period were both
+its father and its mother, while, as Mr. Brooks Adams has shown, the
+looted treasure of India was the potent midwife. Had there not been
+an unwonted increase of capital, the impetus would not have been
+given to invention, while even steam might have languished for
+generations instead of at once becoming, as it did, the most
+prominent factor in the new method of production. The improved
+application of these inventions in the first decades of the
+nineteenth century mark the transition from the domestic to the
+factory system of manufacture and inaugurated the era of capitalism.
+The magnitude of this revolution is manifested by the fact that
+England alone had invented the means and equipped herself with the
+machinery whereby she could overstock the world's markets. The home
+market could not consume a tithe of the home product. To
+manufacture this home product she had sacrificed her agriculture.
+She must buy her food from abroad, and to do so she must sell her
+goods abroad.
+
+But the struggle for commercial supremacy had not yet really begun.
+England was without a rival. Her navies controlled the sea. Her
+armies and her insular position gave her peace at home. The world
+was hers to exploit. For nearly fifty years she dominated the
+European, American, and Indian trade, while the great wars then
+convulsing society were destroying possible competitive capital and
+straining consumption to its utmost. The pioneer of the industrial
+nations, she thus received such a start in the new race for wealth
+that it is only today the other nations have succeeded in overtaking
+her. In 1820 the volume of her trade (imports and exports) was
+68,000,000 pounds. In 1899 it had increased to 815,000,000 pounds,-
+-an increase of 1200 per cent in the volume of trade.
+
+For nearly one hundred years England has been producing surplus
+value. She has been producing far more than she consumes, and this
+excess has swelled the volume of her capital. This capital has been
+invested in her enterprises at home and abroad, and in her shipping.
+In 1898 the Stock Exchange estimated British capital invested abroad
+at 1,900,000,000 pounds. But hand in hand with her foreign
+investments have grown her adverse balances of trade. For the ten
+years ending with 1868, her average yearly adverse balance was
+52,000,000 pounds; ending with 1878, 81,000,000 pounds; ending with
+1888, 101,000,000 pounds; and ending with 1898, 133,000,000 pounds.
+In the single year of 1897 it reached the portentous sum of
+157,000,000 pounds.
+
+But England's adverse balances of trade in themselves are nothing at
+which to be frightened. Hitherto they have been paid from out the
+earnings of her shipping and the interest on her foreign
+investments. But what does cause anxiety, however, is that,
+relative to the trade development of other countries, her export
+trade is falling off, without a corresponding diminution of her
+imports, and that her securities and foreign holdings do not seem
+able to stand the added strain. These she is being forced to sell
+in order to pull even. As the London Times gloomily remarks, "We
+are entering the twentieth century on the down grade, after a
+prolonged period of business activity, high wages, high profits, and
+overflowing revenue." In other words, the mighty grasp England held
+over the resources and capital of the world is being relaxed. The
+control of its commerce and banking is slipping through her fingers.
+The sale of her foreign holdings advertises the fact that other
+nations are capable of buying them, and, further, that these other
+nations are busily producing surplus value.
+
+The movement has become general. Today, passing from country to
+country, an ever-increasing tide of capital is welling up.
+Production is doubling and quadrupling upon itself. It used to be
+that the impoverished or undeveloped nations turned to England when
+it came to borrowing, but now Germany is competing keenly with her
+in this matter. France is not averse to lending great sums to
+Russia, and Austria-Hungary has capital and to spare for foreign
+holdings.
+
+Nor has the United States failed to pass from the side of the debtor
+to that of the creditor nations. She, too, has become wise in the
+way of producing surplus value. She has been successful in her
+efforts to secure economic emancipation. Possessing but 5 per cent
+of the world's population and producing 32 per cent of the world's
+food supply, she has been looked upon as the world's farmer; but
+now, amidst general consternation, she comes forward as the world's
+manufacturer. In 1888 her manufactured exports amounted to
+$130,300,087; in 1896, to $253,681,541; in 1897, to $279,652,721; in
+1898, to $307,924,994; in 1899, to $338,667,794; and in 1900, to
+$432,000,000. Regarding her growing favorable balances of trade, it
+may be noted that not only are her imports not increasing, but they
+are actually falling off, while her exports in the last decade have
+increased 72.4 per cent. In ten years her imports from Europe have
+been reduced from $474,000,000 to $439,000,000; while in the same
+time her exports have increased from $682,000,000 to $1,111,000,000.
+Her balance of trade in her favor in 1895 was $75,000,000; in 1896,
+over $100,000,000; in 1897, nearly $300,000,000; in 1898,
+$615,000,000; in 1899, $530,000,000; and in 1900, $648,000,000.
+
+In the matter of iron, the United States, which in 1840 had not
+dreamed of entering the field of international competition, in 1897,
+as much to her own surprise as any one else's, undersold the English
+in their own London market. In 1899 there was but one American
+locomotive in Great Britain; but, of the five hundred locomotives
+sold abroad by the United States in 1902, England bought more than
+any other country. Russia is operating a thousand of them on her
+own roads today. In one instance the American manufacturers
+contracted to deliver a locomotive in four and one-half months for
+$9250, the English manufacturers requiring twenty-four months for
+delivery at $14,000. The Clyde shipbuilders recently placed orders
+for 150,000 tons of plates at a saving of $250,000, and the American
+steel going into the making of the new London subway is taken as a
+matter of course. American tools stand above competition the world
+over. Ready-made boots and shoes are beginning to flood Europe,--
+the same with machinery, bicycles, agricultural implements, and all
+kinds of manufactured goods. A correspondent from Hamburg, speaking
+of the invasion of American trade, says: "Incidentally, it may be
+remarked that the typewriting machine with which this article is
+written, as well as the thousands--nay, hundreds of thousands--of
+others that are in use throughout the world, were made in America;
+that it stands on an American table, in an office furnished with
+American desks, bookcases, and chairs, which cannot be made in
+Europe of equal quality, so practical and convenient, for a similar
+price."
+
+In 1893 and 1894, because of the distrust of foreign capital, the
+United States was forced to buy back American securities held
+abroad; but in 1897 and 1898 she bought back American securities
+held abroad, not because she had to, but because she chose to. And
+not only has she bought back her own securities, but in the last
+eight years she has become a buyer of the securities of other
+countries. In the money markets of London, Paris, and Berlin she is
+a lender of money. Carrying the largest stock of gold in the world,
+the world, in moments of danger, when crises of international
+finance loom large, looks to her vast lending ability for safety.
+
+Thus, in a few swift years, has the United States drawn up to the
+van where the great industrial nations are fighting for commercial
+and financial empire. The figures of the race, in which she passed
+England, are interesting:
+
+Year United States Exports United Kingdom Exports
+1875 $497,263,737 $1,087,497,000
+1885 673,593,506 1,037,124,000
+1895 807,742,415 1,100,452,000
+1896 986,830,080 1,168,671,000
+1897 1,079,834,296 1,139,882,000
+1898 1,233,564,828 1,135,642,000
+1899 1,253,466,000 1,287,971,000
+1900 1,453,013,659 1,418,348,000
+
+As Mr. Henry Demarest Lloyd has noted, "When the news reached
+Germany of the new steel trust in America, the stocks of the iron
+and steel mills listed on the Berlin Bourse fell." While Europe has
+been talking and dreaming of the greatness which was, the United
+States has been thinking and planning and doing for the greatness to
+be. Her captains of industry and kings of finance have toiled and
+sweated at organizing and consolidating production and
+transportation. But this has been merely the developmental stage,
+the tuning-up of the orchestra. With the twentieth century rises
+the curtain on the play,--a play which shall have much in it of
+comedy and a vast deal of tragedy, and which has been well named The
+Capitalistic Conquest of Europe by America. Nations do not die
+easily, and one of the first moves of Europe will be the erection of
+tariff walls. America, however, will fittingly reply, for already
+her manufacturers are establishing works in France and Germany. And
+when the German trade journals refused to accept American
+advertisements, they found their country flamingly bill-boarded in
+buccaneer American fashion.
+
+M. Leroy-Beaulieu, the French economist, is passionately preaching a
+commercial combination of the whole Continent against the United
+States,--a commercial alliance which, he boldly declares, should
+become a political alliance. And in this he is not alone, finding
+ready sympathy and ardent support in Austria, Italy, and Germany.
+Lord Rosebery said, in a recent speech before the Wolverhampton
+Chamber of Commerce: "The Americans, with their vast and almost
+incalculable resources, their acuteness and enterprise, and their
+huge population, which will probably be 100,000,000 in twenty years,
+together with the plan they have adopted for putting accumulated
+wealth into great cooperative syndicates or trusts for the purpose
+of carrying on this great commercial warfare, are the most
+formidable . . . rivals to be feared."
+
+The London Times says: "It is useless to disguise the fact that
+Great Britain is being outdistanced. The competition does not come
+from the glut caused by miscalculation as to the home demand. Our
+own steel-makers know better and are alarmed. The threatened
+competition in markets hitherto our own comes from efficiency in
+production such as never before has been seen." Even the British
+naval supremacy is in danger, continues the same paper, "for, if we
+lose our engineering supremacy, our naval supremacy will follow,
+unless held on sufferance by our successful rivals."
+
+And the Edinburgh Evening News says, with editorial gloom: "The
+iron and steel trades have gone from us. When the fictitious
+prosperity caused by the expenditure of our own Government and that
+of European nations on armaments ceases, half of the men employed in
+these industries will be turned into the streets. The outlook is
+appalling. What suffering will have to be endured before the
+workers realize that there is nothing left for them but emigration!"
+
+
+That there must be a limit to the accumulation of capital is
+obvious. The downward course of the rate of interest,
+notwithstanding that many new employments have been made possible
+for capital, indicates how large is the increase of surplus value.
+This decline of the interest rate is in accord with Bohm-Bawerk's
+law of "diminishing returns." That is, when capital, like anything
+else, has become over-plentiful, less lucrative use can only be
+found for the excess. This excess, not being able to earn so much
+as when capital was less plentiful, competes for safe investments
+and forces down the interest rate on all capital. Mr. Charles A.
+Conant has well described the keenness of the scramble for safe
+investments, even at the prevailing low rates of interest. At the
+close of the war with Turkey, the Greek loan, guaranteed by Great
+Britain, France, and Russia, was floated with striking ease.
+Regardless of the small return, the amount offered at Paris,
+(41,000,000 francs), was subscribed for twenty-three times over.
+Great Britain, France, Germany, Holland, and the Scandinavian
+States, of recent years, have all engaged in converting their
+securities from 5 per cents to 4 per cents, from 4.5 per cents to
+3.5 per cents, and the 3.5 per cents into 3 per cents.
+
+Great Britain, France, Germany, and Austria-Hungary, according to
+the calculation taken in 1895 by the International Statistical
+Institute, hold forty-six billions of capital invested in negotiable
+securities alone. Yet Paris subscribed for her portion of the Greek
+loan twenty-three times over! In short, money is cheap. Andrew
+Carnegie and his brother bourgeois kings give away millions
+annually, but still the tide wells up. These vast accumulations
+have made possible "wild-catting," fraudulent combinations, fake
+enterprises, Hooleyism; but such stealings, great though they be,
+have little or no effect in reducing the volume. The time is past
+when startling inventions, or revolutions in the method of
+production, can break up the growing congestion; yet this saved
+capital demands an outlet, somewhere, somehow.
+
+When a great nation has equipped itself to produce far more than it
+can, under the present division of the product, consume, it seeks
+other markets for its surplus products. When a second nation finds
+itself similarly circumstanced, competition for these other markets
+naturally follows. With the advent of a third, a fourth, a fifth,
+and of divers other nations, the question of the disposal of surplus
+products grows serious. And with each of these nations possessing,
+over and beyond its active capital, great and growing masses of idle
+capital, and when the very foreign markets for which they are
+competing are beginning to produce similar wares for themselves, the
+question passes the serious stage and becomes critical.
+
+Never has the struggle for foreign markets been sharper than at the
+present. They are the one great outlet for congested accumulations.
+Predatory capital wanders the world over, seeking where it may
+establish itself. This urgent need for foreign markets is forcing
+upon the world-stage an era of great colonial empire. But this does
+not stand, as in the past, for the subjugation of peoples and
+countries for the sake of gaining their products, but for the
+privilege of selling them products. The theory once was, that the
+colony owed its existence and prosperity to the mother country; but
+today it is the mother country that owes its existence and
+prosperity to the colony. And in the future, when that supporting
+colony becomes wise in the way of producing surplus value and sends
+its goods back to sell to the mother country, what then? Then the
+world will have been exploited, and capitalistic production will
+have attained its maximum development.
+
+Foreign markets and undeveloped countries largely retard that
+moment. The favored portions of the earth's surface are already
+occupied, though the resources of many are yet virgin. That they
+have not long since been wrested from the hands of the barbarous and
+decadent peoples who possess them is due, not to the military
+prowess of such peoples, but to the jealous vigilance of the
+industrial nations. The powers hold one another back. The Turk
+lives because the way is not yet clear to an amicable division of
+him among the powers. And the United States, supreme though she is,
+opposes the partition of China, and intervenes her huge bulk between
+the hungry nations and the mongrel Spanish republics. Capital
+stands in its own way, welling up and welling up against the
+inevitable moment when it shall burst all bonds and sweep
+resistlessly across such vast stretches as China and South America.
+And then there will be no more worlds to exploit, and capitalism
+will either fall back, crushed under its own weight, or a change of
+direction will take place which will mark a new era in history.
+
+The Far East affords an illuminating spectacle. While the Western
+nations are crowding hungrily in, while the Partition of China is
+commingled with the clamor for the Spheres of Influence and the Open
+Door, other forces are none the less potently at work. Not only are
+the young Western peoples pressing the older ones to the wall, but
+the East itself is beginning to awake. American trade is advancing,
+and British trade is losing ground, while Japan, China, and India
+are taking a hand in the game themselves.
+
+In 1893, 100,000 pieces of American drills were imported into China;
+in 1897, 349,000. In 1893, 252,000 pieces of American sheetings
+were imported against 71,000 British; but in 1897, 566,000 pieces of
+American sheetings were imported against only 10,000 British. The
+cotton goods and yarn trade (which forms 40 per cent of the whole
+trade with China) shows a remarkable advance on the part of the
+United States. During the last ten years America has increased her
+importation of plain goods by 121 per cent in quantity and 59.5 per
+cent in value, while that of England and India combined has
+decreased 13.75 per cent in quantity and 8 per cent in value. Lord
+Charles Beresford, from whose "Break-up of China" these figures are
+taken, states that English yarn has receded and Indian yarn advanced
+to the front. In 1897, 140,000 piculs of Indian yarn were imported,
+18,000 of Japanese, 4500 of Shanghai-manufactured, and 700 of
+English.
+
+Japan, who but yesterday emerged from the mediaeval rule of the
+Shogunate and seized in one fell swoop the scientific knowledge and
+culture of the Occident, is already today showing what wisdom she
+has acquired in the production of surplus value, and is preparing
+herself that she may tomorrow play the part to Asia that England did
+to Europe one hundred years ago. That the difference in the world's
+affairs wrought by those one hundred years will prevent her
+succeeding is manifest; but it is equally manifest that they cannot
+prevent her playing a leading part in the industrial drama which has
+commenced on the Eastern stage. Her imports into the port of
+Newchang in 1891 amounted to but 22,000 taels; but in 1897 they had
+increased to 280,000 taels. In manufactured goods, from matches,
+watches, and clocks to the rolling stock of railways, she has
+already given stiff shocks to her competitors in the Asiatic
+markets; and this while she is virtually yet in the equipment stage
+of production. Erelong she, too, will be furnishing her share to
+the growing mass of the world's capital.
+
+As regards Great Britain, the giant trader who has so long
+overshadowed Asiatic commerce, Lord Charles Beresford says: "But
+competition is telling adversely; the energy of the British merchant
+is being equalled by other nationals. . . The competition of the
+Chinese and the introduction of steam into the country are also
+combining to produce changed conditions in China." But far more
+ominous is the plaintive note he sounds when he says: "New
+industries must be opened up, and I would especially direct the
+attention of the Chambers of Commerce (British) to . . . the fact
+that the more the native competes with the British manufacturer in
+certain classes of trade, the more machinery he will need, and the
+orders for such machinery will come to this country if our machinery
+manufacturers are enterprising enough."
+
+The Orient is beginning to show what an important factor it will
+become, under Western supervision, in the creation of surplus value.
+Even before the barriers which restrain Western capital are removed,
+the East will be in a fair way toward being exploited. An analysis
+of Lord Beresford's message to the Chambers of Commerce discloses,
+first, that the East is beginning to manufacture for itself; and,
+second, that there is a promise of keen competition in the West for
+the privilege of selling the required machinery. The inexorable
+query arises: WHAT IS THE WEST TO DO WHEN IT HAS FURNISHED THIS
+MACHINERY? And when not only the East, but all the now undeveloped
+countries, confront, with surplus products in their hands, the old
+industrial nations, capitalistic production will have attained its
+maximum development.
+
+But before that time must intervene a period which bids one pause
+for breath. A new romance, like unto none in all the past, the
+economic romance, will be born. For the dazzling prize of world-
+empire will the nations of the earth go up in harness. Powers will
+rise and fall, and mighty coalitions shape and dissolve in the swift
+whirl of events. Vassal nations and subject territories will be
+bandied back and forth like so many articles of trade. And with the
+inevitable displacement of economic centres, it is fair to presume
+that populations will shift to and fro, as they once did from the
+South to the North of England on the rise of the factory towns, or
+from the Old World to the New. Colossal enterprises will be
+projected and carried through, and combinations of capital and
+federations of labor be effected on a cyclopean scale.
+Concentration and organization will be perfected in ways hitherto
+undreamed. The nation which would keep its head above the tide must
+accurately adjust supply to demand, and eliminate waste to the last
+least particle. Standards of living will most likely descend for
+millions of people. With the increase of capital, the competition
+for safe investments, and the consequent fall of the interest rate,
+the principal which today earns a comfortable income would not then
+support a bare existence. Saving toward old age would cease among
+the working classes. And as the merchant cities of Italy crashed
+when trade slipped from their hands on the discovery of the new
+route to the Indies by way of the Cape of Good Hope, so will there
+come times of trembling for such nations as have failed to grasp the
+prize of world-empire. In that given direction they will have
+attained their maximum development, before the whole world, in the
+same direction, has attained its. There will no longer be room for
+them. But if they can survive the shock of being flung out of the
+world's industrial orbit, a change in direction may then be easily
+effected. That the decadent and barbarous peoples will be crushed
+is a fair presumption; likewise that the stronger breeds will
+survive, entering upon the transition stage to which all the world
+must ultimately come.
+
+This change of direction must be either toward industrial
+oligarchies or socialism. Either the functions of private
+corporations will increase till they absorb the central government,
+or the functions of government will increase till it absorbs the
+corporations. Much may be said on the chance of the oligarchy.
+Should an old manufacturing nation lose its foreign trade, it is
+safe to predict that a strong effort would be made to build a
+socialistic government, but it does not follow that this effort
+would be successful. With the moneyed class controlling the State
+and its revenues and all the means of subsistence, and guarding its
+own interests with jealous care, it is not at all impossible that a
+strong curb could be put upon the masses till the crisis were past.
+It has been done before. There is no reason why it should not be
+done again. At the close of the last century, such a movement was
+crushed by its own folly and immaturity. In 1871 the soldiers of
+the economic rulers stamped out, root and branch, a whole generation
+of militant socialists.
+
+Once the crisis were past, the ruling class, still holding the curb
+in order to make itself more secure, would proceed to readjust
+things and to balance consumption with production. Having a
+monopoly of the safe investments, the great masses of unremunerative
+capital would be directed, not to the production of more surplus
+value, but to the making of permanent improvements, which would give
+employment to the people, and make them content with the new order
+of things. Highways, parks, public buildings, monuments, could be
+builded; nor would it be out of place to give better factories and
+homes to the workers. Such in itself would be socialistic, save
+that it would be done by the oligarchs, a class apart. With the
+interest rate down to zero, and no field for the investment of
+sporadic capital, savings among the people would utterly cease, and
+old-age pensions be granted as a matter of course. It is also a
+logical necessity of such a system that, when the population began
+to press against the means of subsistence, (expansion being
+impossible), the birth rate of the lower classes would be lessened.
+Whether by their own initiative, or by the interference of the
+rulers, it would have to be done, and it would be done. In other
+words, the oligarchy would mean the capitalization of labor and the
+enslavement of the whole population. But it would be a fairer,
+juster form of slavery than any the world has yet seen. The per
+capita wage and consumption would be increased, and, with a
+stringent control of the birth rate, there is no reason why such a
+country should not be so ruled through many generations.
+
+On the other hand, as the capitalistic exploitation of the planet
+approaches its maximum, and countries are crowded out of the field
+of foreign exchanges, there is a large likelihood that their change
+in direction will be toward socialism. Were the theory of
+collective ownership and operation then to arise for the first time,
+such a movement would stand small chance of success. But such is
+not the case. The doctrine of socialism has flourished and grown
+throughout the nineteenth century; its tenets have been preached
+wherever the interests of labor and capital have clashed; and it has
+received exemplification time and again by the State's assumption of
+functions which had always belonged solely to the individual.
+
+When capitalistic production has attained its maximum development,
+it must confront a dividing of the ways; and the strength of capital
+on the one hand, and the education and wisdom of the workers on the
+other, will determine which path society is to travel. It is
+possible, considering the inertia of the masses, that the whole
+world might in time come to be dominated by a group of industrial
+oligarchies, or by one great oligarchy, but it is not probable.
+That sporadic oligarchies may flourish for definite periods of time
+is highly possible; that they may continue to do so is as highly
+improbable. The procession of the ages has marked not only the rise
+of man, but the rise of the common man. From the chattel slave, or
+the serf chained to the soil, to the highest seats in modern
+society, he has risen, rung by rung, amid the crumbling of the
+divine right of kings and the crash of falling sceptres. That he
+has done this, only in the end to pass into the perpetual slavery of
+the industrial oligarch, is something at which his whole past cries
+in protest. The common man is worthy of a better future, or else he
+is not worthy of his past.
+
+
+NOTE.--The above article was written as long ago as 1898. The only
+alteration has been the bringing up to 1900 of a few of its
+statistics. As a commercial venture of an author, it has an
+interesting history. It was promptly accepted by one of the leading
+magazines and paid for. The editor confessed that it was "one of
+those articles one could not possibly let go of after it was once in
+his possession." Publication was voluntarily promised to be
+immediate. Then the editor became afraid of its too radical nature,
+forfeited the sum paid for it, and did not publish it. Nor, offered
+far and wide, could any other editor of bourgeois periodicals be
+found who was rash enough to publish it. Thus, for the first time,
+after seven years, it appears in print.
+
+
+
+A REVIEW
+
+
+
+Two remarkable books are Ghent's "Our Benevolent Feudalism" {7} and
+Brooks's "The Social Unrest." {8} In these two books the opposite
+sides of the labor problem are expounded, each writer devoting
+himself with apprehension to the side he fears and views with
+disfavor. It would appear that they have set themselves the task of
+collating, as a warning, the phenomena of two counter social forces.
+Mr. Ghent, who is sympathetic with the socialist movement, follows
+with cynic fear every aggressive act of the capitalist class. Mr.
+Brooks, who yearns for the perpetuation of the capitalist system as
+long as possible, follows with grave dismay each aggressive act of
+the labor and socialist organizations. Mr. Ghent traces the
+emasculation of labor by capital, and Mr. Brooks traces the
+emasculation of independent competing capital by labor. In short,
+each marshals the facts of a side in the two sides which go to make
+a struggle so great that even the French Revolution is insignificant
+beside it; for this later struggle, for the first time in the
+history of struggles, is not confined to any particular portion of
+the globe, but involves the whole of it.
+
+Starting on the assumption that society is at present in a state of
+flux, Mr. Ghent sees it rapidly crystallizing into a status which
+can best be described as something in the nature of a benevolent
+feudalism. He laughs to scorn any immediate realization of the
+Marxian dream, while Tolstoyan utopias and Kropotkinian communistic
+unions of shop and farm are too wild to merit consideration. The
+coming status which Mr. Ghent depicts is a class domination by the
+capitalists. Labor will take its definite place as a dependent
+class, living in a condition of machine servitude fairly analogous
+to the land servitude of the Middle Ages. That is to say, labor
+will be bound to the machine, though less harshly, in fashion
+somewhat similar to that in which the earlier serf was bound to the
+soil. As he says, "Bondage to the land was the basis of villeinage
+in the old regime; bondage to the job will be the basis of
+villeinage in the new."
+
+At the top of the new society will tower the magnate, the new feudal
+baron; at the bottom will be found the wastrels and the
+inefficients. The new society he grades as follows:
+
+
+"I. The barons, graded on the basis of possessions.
+
+"II. The court agents and retainers. (This class will include the
+editors of 'respectable' and 'safe' newspapers, the pastors of
+'conservative' and 'wealthy' churches, the professors and teachers
+in endowed colleges and schools, lawyers generally, and most judges
+and politicians).
+
+"III. The workers in pure and applied science, artists, and
+physicians.
+
+"IV. The entrepreneurs, the managers of the great industries,
+transformed into a salaried class.
+
+"V. The foremen and superintendents. This class has heretofore
+been recruited largely from the skilled workers, but with the growth
+of technical education in schools and colleges, and the development
+of fixed caste, it is likely to become entirely differentiated.
+
+"VI. The villeins of the cities and towns, more or less regularly
+employed, who do skilled work and are partially protected by
+organization.
+
+"VII. The villeins of the cities and towns who do unskilled work
+and are unprotected by organization. They will comprise the
+laborers, domestics, and clerks.
+
+"VIII. The villeins of the manorial estates, of the great farms,
+the mines, and the forests.
+
+"IX. The small-unit farmers (land-owning), the petty tradesmen, and
+manufacturers.
+
+"X. The subtenants of the manorial estates and great farms
+(corresponding to the class of 'free tenants' in the old Feudalism).
+
+"XI. The cotters.
+
+"XII. The tramps, the occasionally employed, the unemployed--the
+wastrels of the city and country."
+
+"The new Feudalism, like most autocracies, will foster not only the
+arts, but also certain kinds of learning--particularly the kinds
+which are unlikely to disturb the minds of the multitude. A future
+Marsh, or Cope, or Le Comte will be liberally patronized and left
+free to discover what he will; and so, too, an Edison or a Marconi.
+Only they must not meddle with anything relating to social science."
+
+It must be confessed that Mr. Ghent's arguments are cunningly
+contrived and arrayed. They must be read to be appreciated. As an
+example of his style, which at the same time generalizes a portion
+of his argument, the following may well be given:
+
+"The new Feudalism will be but an orderly outgrowth of present
+tendencies and conditions. All societies evolve naturally out of
+their predecessors. In sociology, as in biology, there is no cell
+without a parent cell. The society of each generation develops a
+multitude of spontaneous and acquired variations, and out of these,
+by a blending process of natural and conscious selection, the
+succeeding society is evolved. The new order will differ in no
+important respects from the present, except in the completer
+development of its more salient features. The visitor from another
+planet who had known the old and should see the new would note but
+few changes. Alter et Idem--another yet the same--he would say.
+From magnate to baron, from workman to villein, from publicist to
+court agent and retainer, will be changes of state and function so
+slight as to elude all but the keenest eyes."
+
+And in conclusion, to show how benevolent and beautiful this new
+feudalism of ours will be, Mr. Ghent says: "Peace and stability it
+will maintain at all hazards; and the mass, remembering the chaos,
+the turmoil, the insecurity of the past, will bless its reign. . . .
+Efficiency--the faculty of getting things--is at last rewarded as it
+should be, for the efficient have inherited the earth and its
+fulness. The lowly, whose happiness is greater and whose welfare is
+more thoroughly conserved when governed than when governing, as a
+twentieth-century philosopher said of them, are settled and happy in
+the state which reason and experience teach is their God-appointed
+lot. They are comfortable too; and if the patriarchal ideal of a
+vine and fig tree for each is not yet attained, at least each has
+his rented patch in the country or his rented cell in a city
+building. Bread and the circus are freely given to the deserving,
+and as for the undeserving, they are merely reaping the rewards of
+their contumacy and pride. Order reigns, each has his justly
+appointed share, and the state rests, in security, 'lapt in
+universal law.'"
+
+Mr. Brooks, on the other hand, sees rising and dissolving and rising
+again in the social flux the ominous forms of a new society which is
+the direct antithesis of a benevolent feudalism. He trembles at the
+rash intrepidity of the capitalists who fight the labor unions, for
+by such rashness he greatly fears that labor will be driven to
+express its aims and strength in political terms, which terms will
+inevitably be socialistic terms.
+
+To keep down the rising tide of socialism, he preaches greater
+meekness and benevolence to the capitalists. No longer may they
+claim the right to run their own business, to beat down the
+laborer's standard of living for the sake of increased profits, to
+dictate terms of employment to individual workers, to wax
+righteously indignant when organized labor takes a hand in their
+business. No longer may the capitalist say "my" business, or even
+think "my" business; he must say "our" business, and think "our"
+business as well, accepting labor as a partner whose voice must be
+heard. And if the capitalists do not become more meek and
+benevolent in their dealings with labor, labor will be antagonized
+and will proceed to wreak terrible political vengeance, and the
+present social flux will harden into a status of socialism.
+
+Mr. Brooks dreams of a society at which Mr. Ghent sneers as "a
+slightly modified individualism, wherein each unit secures the just
+reward of his capacity and service." To attain this happy state,
+Mr. Brooks imposes circumspection upon the capitalists in their
+relations with labor. "If the socialistic spirit is to be held in
+abeyance in this country, businesses of this character (anthracite
+coal mining) must be handled with extraordinary caution." Which is
+to say, that to withstand the advance of socialism, a great and
+greater measure of Mr. Ghent's BENEVOLENCE will be required.
+
+Again and again, Mr. Brooks reiterates the danger he sees in harshly
+treating labor. "It is not probable that employers can destroy
+unionism in the United States. Adroit and desperate attempts will,
+however, be made, if we mean by unionism the undisciplined and
+aggressive fact of vigorous and determined organizations. If
+capital should prove too strong in this struggle, the result is easy
+to predict. The employers have only to convince organized labor
+that it cannot hold its own against the capitalist manager, and the
+whole energy that now goes to the union will turn to an aggressive
+political socialism. It will not be the harmless sympathy with
+increased city and state functions which trade unions already feel;
+it will become a turbulent political force bent upon using every
+weapon of taxation against the rich."
+
+"The most concrete impulse that now favors socialism in this country
+is the insane purpose to deprive labor organizations of the full and
+complete rights that go with federated unionism."
+
+"That which teaches a union that it cannot succeed as a union turns
+it toward socialism. In long strikes in towns like Marlboro and
+Brookfield strong unions are defeated. Hundreds of men leave these
+towns for shoe-centres like Brockton, where they are now voting the
+socialist ticket. The socialist mayor of this city tells me, 'The
+men who come to us now from towns where they have been thoroughly
+whipped in a strike are among our most active working socialists.'
+The bitterness engendered by this sense of defeat is turned to
+politics, as it will throughout the whole country, if organization
+of labor is deprived of its rights."
+
+"This enmity of capital to the trade union is watched with glee by
+every intelligent socialist in our midst. Every union that is
+beaten or discouraged in its struggle is ripening fruit for
+socialism."
+
+"The real peril which we now face is the threat of a class conflict.
+If capitalism insists upon the policy of outraging the saving
+aspiration of the American workman to raise his standard of comfort
+and leisure, every element of class conflict will strengthen among
+us."
+
+"We have only to humiliate what is best in the trade union, and then
+every worst feature of socialism is fastened upon us."
+
+This strong tendency in the ranks of the workers toward socialism is
+what Mr. Brooks characterizes the "social unrest"; and he hopes to
+see the Republican, the Cleveland Democrat, and the conservative and
+large property interests "band together against this common foe,"
+which is socialism. And he is not above feeling grave and well-
+contained satisfaction wherever the socialist doctrinaire has been
+contradicted by men attempting to practise cooperation in the midst
+of the competitive system, as in Belgium.
+
+Nevertheless, he catches fleeting glimpses of an extreme and
+tyrannically benevolent feudalism very like to Mr. Ghent's, as
+witness the following:
+
+"I asked one of the largest employers of labor in the South if he
+feared the coming of the trade union. 'No,' he said, 'it is one
+good result of race prejudice, that the negro will enable us in the
+long run to weaken the trade union so that it cannot harm us. We
+can keep wages down with the negro and we can prevent too much
+organization.'
+
+"It is in this spirit that the lower standards are to be used. If
+this purpose should succeed, it has but one issue,--the immense
+strengthening of a plutocratic administration at the top, served by
+an army of high-salaried helpers, with an elite of skilled and well-
+paid workmen, but all resting on what would essentially be a serf
+class of low-paid labor and this mass kept in order by an increased
+use of military force."
+
+In brief summary of these two notable books, it may be said that Mr.
+Ghent is alarmed, (though he does not flatly say so), at the too
+great social restfulness in the community, which is permitting the
+capitalists to form the new society to their liking; and that Mr.
+Brooks is alarmed, (and he flatly says so), at the social unrest
+which threatens the modified individualism into which he would like
+to see society evolve. Mr. Ghent beholds the capitalist class
+rising to dominate the state and the working class; Mr. Brooks
+beholds the working class rising to dominate the state and the
+capitalist class. One fears the paternalism of a class; the other,
+the tyranny of the mass.
+
+
+
+WANTED: A NEW LAW OF DEVELOPMENT
+
+
+
+Evolution is no longer a mere tentative hypothesis. One by one,
+step by step, each division and subdivision of science has
+contributed its evidence, until now the case is complete and the
+verdict rendered. While there is still discussion as to the method
+of evolution, none the less, as a process sufficient to explain all
+biological phenomena, all differentiations of life into widely
+diverse species, families, and even kingdoms, evolution is flatly
+accepted. Likewise has been accepted its law of development: THAT,
+IN THE STRUGGLE FOR EXISTENCE, THE STRONG AND FIT AND THE PROGENY OF
+THE STRONG AND FIT HAVE A BETTER OPPORTUNITY FOR SURVIVAL THAN THE
+WEAK AND LESS FIT AND THE PROGENY OF THE WEAK AND LESS FIT.
+
+It is in the struggle of the species with other species and against
+all other hostile forces in the environment, that this law operates;
+also in the struggle between the individuals of the same species.
+In this struggle, which is for food and shelter, the weak
+individuals must obviously win less food and shelter than the
+strong. Because of this, their hold on life relaxes and they are
+eliminated. And for the same reason that they may not win for
+themselves adequate food and shelter, the weak cannot give to their
+progeny the chance for survival that the strong give. And thus,
+since the weak are prone to beget weakness, the species is
+constantly purged of its inefficient members.
+
+Because of this, a premium is placed upon strength, and so long as
+the struggle for food and shelter obtains, just so long will the
+average strength of each generation increase. On the other hand,
+should conditions so change that all, and the progeny of all, the
+weak as well as the strong, have an equal chance for survival, then,
+at once, the average strength of each generation will begin to
+diminish. Never yet, however, in animal life, has there been such a
+state of affairs. Natural selection has always obtained. The
+strong and their progeny, at the expense of the weak, have always
+survived. This law of development has operated down all the past
+upon all life; it so operates today, and it is not rash to say that
+it will continue to operate in the future--at least upon all life
+existing in a state of nature.
+
+Man, preeminent though he is in the animal kingdom, capable of
+reacting upon and making suitable an unsuitable environment,
+nevertheless remains the creature of this same law of development.
+The social selection to which he is subject is merely another form
+of natural selection. True, within certain narrow limits he
+modifies the struggle for existence and renders less precarious the
+tenure of life for the weak. The extremely weak, diseased, and
+inefficient are housed in hospitals and asylums. The strength of
+the viciously strong, when inimical to society, is tempered by penal
+institutions and by the gallows. The short-sighted are provided
+with spectacles, and the sickly (when they can pay for it) with
+sanitariums. Pestilential marshes are drained, plagues are checked,
+and disasters averted. Yet, for all that, the strong and the
+progeny of the strong survive, and the weak are crushed out. The
+men strong of brain are masters as of yore. They dominate society
+and gather to themselves the wealth of society. With this wealth
+they maintain themselves and equip their progeny for the struggle.
+They build their homes in healthful places, purchase the best
+fruits, meats, and vegetables the market affords, and buy themselves
+the ministrations of the most brilliant and learned of the
+professional classes. The weak man, as of yore, is the servant, the
+doer of things at the master's call. The weaker and less efficient
+he is, the poorer is his reward. The weakest work for a living
+wage, (when they can get work), live in unsanitary slums, on vile
+and insufficient food, at the lowest depths of human degradation.
+Their grasp on life is indeed precarious, their mortality excessive,
+their infant death-rate appalling.
+
+That some should be born to preferment and others to ignominy in
+order that the race may progress, is cruel and sad; but none the
+less they are so born. The weeding out of human souls, some for
+fatness and smiles, some for leanness and tears, is surely a
+heartless selective process--as heartless as it is natural. And the
+human family, for all its wonderful record of adventure and
+achievement, has not yet succeeded in avoiding this process. That
+it is incapable of doing this is not to be hazarded. Not only is it
+capable, but the whole trend of society is in that direction. All
+the social forces are driving man on to a time when the old
+selective law will be annulled. There is no escaping it, save by
+the intervention of catastrophes and cataclysms quite unthinkable.
+It is inexorable. It is inexorable because the common man demands
+it. The twentieth century, the common man says, is his day; the
+common man's day, or, rather, the dawning of the common man's day.
+
+Nor can it be denied. The evidence is with him. The previous
+centuries, and more notably the nineteenth, have marked the rise of
+the common man. From chattel slavery to serfdom, and from serfdom
+to what he bitterly terms "wage slavery," he has risen. Never was
+he so strong as he is today, and never so menacing. He does the
+work of the world, and he is beginning to know it. The world cannot
+get along without him, and this also he is beginning to know. All
+the human knowledge of the past, all the scientific discovery,
+governmental experiment, and invention of machinery, have tended to
+his advancement. His standard of living is higher. His common
+school education would shame princes ten centuries past. His civil
+and religious liberty makes him a free man, and his ballot the peer
+of his betters. And all this has tended to make him conscious,
+conscious of himself, conscious of his class. He looks about him
+and questions that ancient law of development. It is cruel and
+wrong, he is beginning to declare. It is an anachronism. Let it be
+abolished. Why should there be one empty belly in all the world,
+when the work of ten men can feed a hundred? What if my brother be
+not so strong as I? He has not sinned. Wherefore should he hunger-
+-he and his sinless little ones? Away with the old law. There is
+food and shelter for all, therefore let all receive food and
+shelter.
+
+As fast as labor has become conscious it has organized. The
+ambition of these class-conscious men is that the movement shall
+become general, that all labor shall become conscious of itself and
+its class interests. And the day that witnesses the solidarity of
+labor, they triumphantly affirm, will be a day when labor dominates
+the world. This growing consciousness has led to the organization
+of two movements, both separate and distinct, but both converging
+toward a common goal--one, the labor movement, known as Trade
+Unionism; the other, the political movement, known as Socialism.
+Both are grim and silent forces, unheralded and virtually unknown to
+the general public save in moments of stress. The sleeping labor
+giant receives little notice from the capitalistic press, and when
+he stirs uneasily, a column of surprise, indignation, and horror
+suffices.
+
+It is only now and then, after long periods of silence, that the
+labor movement puts in its claim for notice. All is quiet. The
+kind old world spins on, and the bourgeois masters clip their
+coupons in smug complacency. But the grim and silent forces are at
+work.
+
+Suddenly, like a clap of thunder from a clear sky, comes a
+disruption of industry. From ocean to ocean the wheels of a great
+chain of railroads cease to run. A quarter of a million miners
+throw down pick and shovel and outrage the sun with their pale,
+bleached faces. The street railways of a swarming metropolis stand
+idle, or the rumble of machinery in vast manufactories dies away to
+silence. There is alarm and panic. Arson and homicide stalk forth.
+There is a cry in the night, and quick anger and sudden death.
+Peaceful cities are affrighted by the crack of rifles and the snarl
+of machine-guns, and the hearts of the shuddering are shaken by the
+roar of dynamite. There is hurrying and skurrying. The wires are
+kept hot between the centre of government and the seat of trouble.
+The chiefs of state ponder gravely and advise, and governors of
+states implore. There is assembling of militia and massing of
+troops, and the streets resound to the tramp of armed men. There
+are separate and joint conferences between the captains of industry
+and the captains of labor. And then, finally, all is quiet again,
+and the memory of it is like the memory of a bad dream.
+
+But these strikes become olympiads, things to date from; and common
+on the lips of men become such phrases as "The Great Dock Strike,"
+"The Great Coal Strike," "The Great Railroad Strike." Never before
+did labor do these things. After the Great Plague in England,
+labor, finding itself in demand and innocently obeying the economic
+law, asked higher wages. But the masters set a maximum wage,
+restrained workingmen from moving about from place to place, refused
+to tolerate idlers, and by most barbarous legal methods punished
+those who disobeyed. But labor is accorded greater respect today.
+Such a policy, put into effect in this the first decade of the
+twentieth century, would sweep the masters from their seats in one
+mighty crash. And the masters know it and are respectful.
+
+A fair instance of the growing solidarity of labor is afforded by an
+unimportant recent strike in San Francisco. The restaurant cooks
+and waiters were completely unorganized, working at any and all
+hours for whatever wages they could get. A representative of the
+American Federation of Labor went among them and organized them.
+Within a few weeks nearly two thousand men were enrolled, and they
+had five thousand dollars on deposit. Then they put in their demand
+for increased wages and shorter hours. Forthwith their employers
+organized. The demand was denied, and the Cooks' and Waiters' Union
+walked out.
+
+All organized employers stood back of the restaurant owners, in
+sympathy with them and willing to aid them if they dared. And at
+the back of the Cooks' and Waiters' Union stood the organized labor
+of the city, 40,000 strong. If a business man was caught
+patronizing an "unfair" restaurant, he was boycotted; if a union man
+was caught, he was fined heavily by his union or expelled. The
+oyster companies and the slaughter houses made an attempt to refuse
+to sell oysters and meat to union restaurants. The Butchers and
+Meat Cutters, and the Teamsters, in retaliation, refused to work for
+or to deliver to non-union restaurants. Upon this the oyster
+companies and slaughter houses acknowledged themselves beaten and
+peace reigned. But the Restaurant Bakers in non-union places were
+ordered out, and the Bakery Wagon Drivers declined to deliver to
+unfair houses.
+
+Every American Federation of Labor union in the city was prepared to
+strike, and waited only the word. And behind all, a handful of men,
+known as the Labor Council, directed the fight. One by one, blow
+upon blow, they were able if they deemed it necessary to call out
+the unions--the Laundry Workers, who do the washing; the Hackmen,
+who haul men to and from restaurants; the Butchers, Meat Cutters,
+and Teamsters; and the Milkers, Milk Drivers, and Chicken Pickers;
+and after that, in pure sympathy, the Retail Clerks, the Horse
+Shoers, the Gas and Electrical Fixture Hangers, the Metal Roofers,
+the Blacksmiths, the Blacksmiths' Helpers, the Stablemen, the
+Machinists, the Brewers, the Coast Seamen, the Varnishers and
+Polishers, the Confectioners, the Upholsterers, the Paper Hangers
+and Fresco Painters, the Drug Clerks, the Fitters and Helpers, the
+Metal Workers, the Boiler Makers and Iron Ship Builders, the
+Assistant Undertakers, the Carriage and Wagon Workers, and so on
+down the lengthy list of organizations.
+
+For, over all these trades, over all these thousands of men, is the
+Labor Council. When it speaks its voice is heard, and when it
+orders it is obeyed. But it, in turn, is dominated by the National
+Labor Council, with which it is constantly in touch. In this wholly
+unimportant little local strike it is of interest to note the stands
+taken by the different sides. The legal representative and official
+mouthpiece of the Employers' Association said: "This organization
+is formed for defensive purposes, and it may be driven to take
+offensive steps, and if so, will be strong enough to follow them up.
+Labor cannot be allowed to dictate to capital and say how business
+shall be conducted. There is no objection to the formation of
+unions and trades councils, but membership must not be compulsory.
+It is repugnant to the American idea of liberty and cannot be
+tolerated."
+
+On the other hand, the president of the Team Drivers' Union said:
+"The employers of labor in this city are generally against the
+trade-union movement and there seems to be a concerted effort on
+their part to check the progress of organized labor. Such action as
+has been taken by them in sympathy with the present labor troubles
+may, if continued, lead to a serious conflict, the outcome of which
+might be most calamitous for the business and industrial interests
+of San Francisco."
+
+And the secretary of the United Brewery Workmen: "I regard a
+sympathetic strike as the last weapon which organized labor should
+use in its defence. When, however, associations of employers band
+together to defeat organized labor, or one of its branches, then we
+should not and will not hesitate ourselves to employ the same
+instrument in retaliation."
+
+Thus, in a little corner of the world, is exemplified the growing
+solidarity of labor. The organization of labor has not only kept
+pace with the organization of industry, but it has gained upon it.
+In one winter, in the anthracite coal region, $160,000,000 in mines
+and $600,000,000 in transportation and distribution consolidated its
+ownership and control. And at once, arrayed as solidly on the other
+side, were the 150,000 anthracite miners. The bituminous mines,
+however, were not consolidated; yet the 250,000 men employed therein
+were already combined. And not only that, but they were also
+combined with the anthracite miners, these 400,000 men being under
+the control and direction of one supreme labor council. And in this
+and the other great councils are to be found captains of labor of
+splendid abilities, who, in understanding of economic and industrial
+conditions, are undeniably the equals of their opponents, the
+captains of industry.
+
+The United States is honeycombed with labor organizations. And the
+big federations which these go to compose aggregate millions of
+members, and in their various branches handle millions of dollars
+yearly. And not only this; for the international brotherhoods and
+unions are forming, and moneys for the aid of strikers pass back and
+forth across the seas. The Machinists, in their demand for a nine-
+hour day, affected 500,000 men in the United States, Mexico, and
+Canada. In England the membership of working-class organizations is
+approximated by Keir Hardie at 2,500,000, with reserve funds of
+$18,000,000. There the cooperative movement has a membership of
+1,500,000, and every year turns over in distribution more than
+$100,000,000. In France, one-eighth of the whole working class is
+unionized. In Belgium the unions are very rich and powerful, and so
+able to defy the masters that many of the smaller manufacturers,
+unable to resist, "are removing their works to other countries where
+the workmen's organizations are not so potential." And in all other
+countries, according to the stage of their economic and political
+development, like figures obtain. And Europe, today, confesses that
+her greatest social problem is the labor problem, and that it is the
+one most closely engrossing the attention of her statesmen.
+
+The organization of labor is one of the chief acknowledged factors
+in the retrogression of British trade. The workers have become
+class conscious as never before. The wrong of one is the wrong of
+all. They have come to realize, in a short-sighted way, that their
+masters' interests are not their interests. The harder they work,
+they believe, the more wealth they create for their masters.
+Further, the more work they do in one day, the fewer men will be
+needed to do the work. So the unions place a day's stint upon their
+members, beyond which they are not permitted to go. In "A Study of
+Trade Unionism," by Benjamin Taylor in the "Nineteenth Century" of
+April, 1898, are furnished some interesting corroborations. The
+facts here set forth were collected by the Executive Board of the
+Employers' Federation, the documentary proofs of which are in the
+hands of the secretaries. In a certain firm the union workmen made
+eight ammunition boxes a day. Nor could they be persuaded into
+making more. A young Swiss, who could not speak English, was set to
+work, and in the first day he made fifty boxes. In the same firm
+the skilled union hands filed up the outside handles of one machine-
+gun a day. That was their stint. No one was known ever to do more.
+A non-union filer came into the shop and did twelve a day. A
+Manchester firm found that to plane a large bed-casting took union
+workmen one hundred and ninety hours, and non-union workmen one
+hundred and thirty-five hours. In another instance a man, resigning
+from his union, day by day did double the amount of work he had done
+formerly. And to cap it all, an English gentleman, going out to
+look at a wall being put up for him by union bricklayers, found one
+of their number with his right arm strapped to his body, doing all
+the work with his left arm -forsooth, because he was such an
+energetic fellow that otherwise he would involuntarily lay more
+bricks than his union permitted.
+
+All England resounds to the cry, "Wake up, England!" But the sulky
+giant is not stirred. "Let England's trade go to pot," he says;
+"what have I to lose?" And England is powerless. The capacity of
+her workmen is represented by 1, in comparison with the 2.25
+capacity of the American workman. And because of the solidarity of
+labor and the destructiveness of strikes, British capitalists dare
+not even strive to emulate the enterprise of American capitalists.
+So England watches trade slipping through her fingers and wails
+unavailingly. As a correspondent writes: "The enormous power of
+the trade unions hangs, a sullen cloud, over the whole industrial
+world here, affecting men and masters alike."
+
+The political movement known as Socialism is, perhaps, even less
+realized by the general public. The great strides it has taken and
+the portentous front it today exhibits are not comprehended; and,
+fastened though it is in every land, it is given little space by the
+capitalistic press. For all its plea and passion and warmth, it
+wells upward like a great, cold tidal wave, irresistible,
+inexorable, ingulfing present-day society level by level. By its
+own preachment it is inexorable. Just as societies have sprung into
+existence, fulfilled their function, and passed away, it claims,
+just as surely is present society hastening on to its dissolution.
+This is a transition period--and destined to be a very short one.
+Barely a century old, capitalism is ripening so rapidly that it can
+never live to see a second birthday. There is no hope for it, the
+Socialists say. It is doomed.
+
+The cardinal tenet of Socialism is that forbidding doctrine, the
+materialistic conception of history. Men are not the masters of
+their souls. They are the puppets of great, blind forces. The
+lives they live and the deaths they die are compulsory. All social
+codes are but the reflexes of existing economic conditions, plus
+certain survivals of past economic conditions. The institutions men
+build they are compelled to build. Economic laws determine at any
+given time what these institutions shall be, how long they shall
+operate, and by what they shall be replaced. And so, through the
+economic process, the Socialist preaches the ripening of the
+capitalistic society and the coming of the new cooperative society.
+
+The second great tenet of Socialism, itself a phase of the
+materialistic conception of history, is the class struggle. In the
+social struggle for existence, men are forced into classes. "The
+history of all society thus far is the history of class strife." In
+existing society the capitalist class exploits the working class,
+the proletariat. The interests of the exploiter are not the
+interests of the exploited. "Profits are legitimate," says the one.
+"Profits are unpaid wages," replies the other, when he has become
+conscious of his class, "therefore profits are robbery." The
+capitalist enforces his profits because he is the legal owner of all
+the means of production. He is the legal owner because he controls
+the political machinery of society. The Socialist sets to work to
+capture the political machinery, so that he may make illegal the
+capitalist's ownership of the means of production, and make legal
+his own ownership of the means of production. And it is this
+struggle, between these two classes, upon which the world has at
+last entered.
+
+Scientific Socialism is very young. Only yesterday it was in
+swaddling clothes. But today it is a vigorous young giant, well
+braced to battle for what it wants, and knowing precisely what it
+wants. It holds its international conventions, where world-policies
+are formulated by the representatives of millions of Socialists. In
+little Belgium there are three-quarters of a million of men who work
+for the cause; in Germany, 3,000,000; Austria, between 1895 and
+1897, raised her socialist vote from 90,000 to 750,000. France in
+1871 had a whole generation of Socialists wiped out; yet in 1885
+there were 30,000, and in 1898, 1,000,000.
+
+Ere the last Spaniard had evacuated Cuba, Socialist groups were
+forming. And from far Japan, in these first days of the twentieth
+century, writes one Tomoyoshi Murai: "The interest of our people on
+Socialism has been greatly awakened these days, especially among our
+laboring people on one hand and young students' circle on the other,
+as much as we can draw an earnest and enthusiastic audience and fill
+our hall, which holds two thousand. . . . It is gratifying to say
+that we have a number of fine and well-trained public orators among
+our leaders of Socialism in Japan. The first speaker tonight is Mr.
+Kiyoshi Kawakami, editor of one of our city (Tokyo) dailies, a
+strong, independent, and decidedly socialistic paper, circulated far
+and wide. Mr. Kawakami is a scholar as well as a popular writer.
+He is going to speak tonight on the subject, 'The Essence of
+Socialism--the Fundamental Principles.' The next speaker is
+Professor Iso Abe, president of our association, whose subject of
+address is, 'Socialism and the Existing Social System.' The third
+speaker is Mr. Naoe Kinosita, the editor of another strong journal
+of the city. He speaks on the subject, 'How to Realize the
+Socialist Ideals and Plans.' Next is Mr. Shigeyoshi Sugiyama, a
+graduate of Hartford Theological Seminary and an advocate of Social
+Christianity, who is to speak on 'Socialism and Municipal Problems.'
+And the last speaker is the editor of the 'Labor World,' the
+foremost leader of the labor-union movement in our country, Mr. Sen
+Katayama, who speaks on the subject, 'The Outlook of Socialism in
+Europe and America.' These addresses are going to be published in
+book form and to be distributed among our people to enlighten their
+minds on the subject."
+
+And in the struggle for the political machinery of society,
+Socialism is no longer confined to mere propaganda. Italy, Austria,
+Belgium, England, have Socialist members in their national bodies.
+Out of the one hundred and thirty-two members of the London County
+Council, ninety-one are denounced by the conservative element as
+Socialists. The Emperor of Germany grows anxious and angry at the
+increasing numbers which are returned to the Reichstag. In France,
+many of the large cities, such as Marseilles, are in the hands of
+the Socialists. A large body of them is in the Chamber of Deputies,
+and Millerand, Socialist, sits in the cabinet. Of him M. Leroy-
+Beaulieu says with horror: "M. Millerand is the open enemy of
+private property, private capital, the resolute advocate of the
+socialization of production . . . a constant incitement to violence
+. . . a collectivist, avowed and militant, taking part in the
+government, dominating the departments of commerce and industry,
+preparing all the laws and presiding at the passage of all measures
+which should be submitted to merchants and tradesmen."
+
+In the United States there are already Socialist mayors of towns and
+members of State legislatures, a vast literature, and single
+Socialist papers with subscription lists running up into the
+hundreds of thousands. In 1896, 36,000 votes were cast for the
+Socialist candidate for President; in 1900, nearly 200,000; in 1904,
+450,000. And the United States, young as it is, is ripening
+rapidly, and the Socialists claim, according to the materialistic
+conception of history, that the United States will be the first
+country in the world wherein the toilers will capture the political
+machinery and expropriate the bourgeoisie.
+
+
+But the Socialist and labor movements have recently entered upon a
+new phase. There has been a remarkable change in attitude on both
+sides. For a long time the labor unions refrained from going in for
+political action. On the other hand, the Socialists claimed that
+without political action labor was powerless. And because of this
+there was much ill feeling between them, even open hostilities, and
+no concerted action. But now the Socialists grant that the labor
+movement has held up wages and decreased the hours of labor, and the
+labor unions find that political action is necessary. Today both
+parties have drawn closely together in the common fight. In the
+United States this friendly feeling grows. The Socialist papers
+espouse the cause of labor, and the unions have opened their ears
+once more to the wiles of the Socialists. They are all leavened
+with Socialist workmen, "boring from within," and many of their
+leaders have already succumbed. In England, where class
+consciousness is more developed, the name "Unionism" has been
+replaced by "The New Unionism," the main object of which is "to
+capture existing social structures in the interests of the wage-
+earners." There the Socialist, the trade-union, and other working-
+class organizations are beginning to cooperate in securing the
+return of representatives to the House of Commons. And in France,
+where the city councils and mayors of Marseilles and Monteaules-
+Mines are Socialistic, thousands of francs of municipal money were
+voted for the aid of the unions in the recent great strikes.
+
+For centuries the world has been preparing for the coming of the
+common man. And the period of preparation virtually past, labor,
+conscious of itself and its desires, has begun a definite movement
+toward solidarity. It believes the time is not far distant when the
+historian will speak not only of the dark ages of feudalism, but of
+the dark ages of capitalism. And labor sincerely believes itself
+justified in this by the terrible indictment it brings against
+capitalistic society. In the face of its enormous wealth,
+capitalistic society forfeits its right to existence when it permits
+widespread, bestial poverty. The philosophy of the survival of the
+fittest does not soothe the class-conscious worker when he learns
+through his class literature that among the Italian pants-finishers
+of Chicago {9} the average weekly wage is $1.31, and the average
+number of weeks employed in the year is 27.85. Likewise when he
+reads:{10} "Every room in these reeking tenements houses a family or
+two. In one room a missionary found a man ill with small-pox, his
+wife just recovering from her confinement, and the children running
+about half naked and covered with dirt. Here are seven people
+living in one underground kitchen, and a little dead child lying in
+the same room. Here live a widow and her six children, two of whom
+are ill with scarlet fever. In another, nine brothers and sisters,
+from twenty-nine years of age downward, live, eat, and sleep
+together." And likewise, when he reads:{11} "When one man, fifty
+years old, who has worked all his life, is compelled to beg a little
+money to bury his dead baby, and another man, fifty years old, can
+give ten million dollars to enable his daughter to live in luxury
+and bolster up a decaying foreign aristocracy, do you see nothing
+amiss?"
+
+And on the other hand, the class-conscious worker reads the
+statistics of the wealthy classes, knows what their incomes are, and
+how they get them. True, down all the past he has known his own
+material misery and the material comfort of the dominant classes,
+and often has this knowledge led him to intemperate acts and unwise
+rebellion. But today, and for the first time, because both society
+and he have evolved, he is beginning to see a possible way out. His
+ears are opening to the propaganda of Socialism, the passionate
+gospel of the dispossessed. But it does not inculcate a turning
+back. The way through is the way out, he understands, and with this
+in mind he draws up the programme.
+
+It is quite simple, this programme. Everything is moving in his
+direction, toward the day when he will take charge. The trust? Ah,
+no. Unlike the trembling middle-class man and the small capitalist,
+he sees nothing at which to be frightened. He likes the trust. He
+exults in the trust, for it is largely doing the task for him. It
+socializes production; this done, there remains nothing for him to
+do but socialize distribution, and all is accomplished. The trust?
+"It organizes industry on an enormous, labor-saving scale, and
+abolishes childish, wasteful competition." It is a gigantic object
+lesson, and it preaches his political economy far more potently than
+he can preach it. He points to the trust, laughing scornfully in
+the face of the orthodox economists. "You told me this thing could
+not be," {12} he thunders. "Behold, the thing is!"
+
+He sees competition in the realm of production passing away. When
+the captains of industry have thoroughly organized production, and
+got everything running smoothly, it will be very easy for him to
+eliminate the profits by stepping in and having the thing run for
+himself. And the captain of industry, if he be good, may be given
+the privilege of continuing the management on a fair salary. The
+sixty millions of dividends which the Standard Oil Company annually
+declares will be distributed among the workers. The same with the
+great United States Steel Corporation. The president of that
+corporation knows his business. Very good. Let him become
+Secretary of the Department of Iron and Steel of the United States.
+But, since the chief executive of a nation of seventy-odd millions
+works for $50,000 a year, the Secretary of the Department of Iron
+and Steel must expect to have his salary cut accordingly. And not
+only will the workers take to themselves the profits of national and
+municipal monopolies, but also the immense revenues which the
+dominant classes today draw from rents, and mines, and factories,
+and all manner of enterprises.
+
+
+All this would seem very like a dream, even to the worker, if it
+were not for the fact that like things have been done before. He
+points triumphantly to the aristocrat of the eighteenth century, who
+fought, legislated, governed, and dominated society, but who was
+shorn of power and displaced by the rising bourgeoisie. Ay, the
+thing was done, he holds. And it shall be done again, but this time
+it is the proletariat who does the shearing. Sociology has taught
+him that m-i-g-h-t spells "right." Every society has been ruled by
+classes, and the classes have ruled by sheer strength, and have been
+overthrown by sheer strength. The bourgeoisie, because it was the
+stronger, dragged down the nobility of the sword; and the
+proletariat, because it is the strongest of all, can and will drag
+down the bourgeoisie.
+
+And in that day, for better or worse, the common man becomes the
+master--for better, he believes. It is his intention to make the
+sum of human happiness far greater. No man shall work for a bare
+living wage, which is degradation. Every man shall have work to do,
+and shall be paid exceedingly well for doing it. There shall be no
+slum classes, no beggars. Nor shall there be hundreds of thousands
+of men and women condemned, for economic reasons, to lives of
+celibacy or sexual infertility. Every man shall be able to marry,
+to live in healthy, comfortable quarters, and to have all he wants
+to eat as many times a day as he wishes. There shall no longer be a
+life-and-death struggle for food and shelter. The old heartless law
+of development shall be annulled.
+
+All of which is very good and very fine. And when these things have
+come to pass, what then? Of old, by virtue of their weakness and
+inefficiency in the struggle for food and shelter, the race was
+purged of its weak and inefficient members. But this will no longer
+obtain. Under the new order the weak and the progeny of the weak
+will have a chance for survival equal to that of the strong and the
+progeny of the strong. This being so, the premium upon strength
+will have been withdrawn, and on the face of it the average strength
+of each generation, instead of continuing to rise, will begin to
+decline.
+
+When the common man's day shall have arrived, the new social
+institutions of that day will prevent the weeding out of weakness
+and inefficiency. All, the weak and the strong, will have an equal
+chance for procreation. And the progeny of all, of the weak as well
+as the strong, will have an equal chance for survival. This being
+so, and if no new effective law of development be put into
+operation, then progress must cease. And not only progress, for
+deterioration would at once set in. It is a pregnant problem. What
+will be the nature of this new and most necessary law of
+development? Can the common man pause long enough from his
+undermining labors to answer? Since he is bent upon dragging down
+the bourgeoisie and reconstructing society, can he so reconstruct
+that a premium, in some unguessed way or other, will still be laid
+upon the strong and efficient so that the human type will continue
+to develop? Can the common man, or the uncommon men who are allied
+with him, devise such a law? Or have they already devised one? And
+if so, what is it?
+
+
+
+HOW I BECAME A SOCIALIST
+
+
+
+It is quite fair to say that I became a Socialist in a fashion
+somewhat similar to the way in which the Teutonic pagans became
+Christians--it was hammered into me. Not only was I not looking for
+Socialism at the time of my conversion, but I was fighting it. I
+was very young and callow, did not know much of anything, and though
+I had never even heard of a school called "Individualism," I sang
+the paean of the strong with all my heart.
+
+This was because I was strong myself. By strong I mean that I had
+good health and hard muscles, both of which possessions are easily
+accounted for. I had lived my childhood on California ranches, my
+boyhood hustling newspapers on the streets of a healthy Western
+city, and my youth on the ozone-laden waters of San Francisco Bay
+and the Pacific Ocean. I loved life in the open, and I toiled in
+the open, at the hardest kinds of work. Learning no trade, but
+drifting along from job to job, I looked on the world and called it
+good, every bit of it. Let me repeat, this optimism was because I
+was healthy and strong, bothered with neither aches nor weaknesses,
+never turned down by the boss because I did not look fit, able
+always to get a job at shovelling coal, sailorizing, or manual labor
+of some sort.
+
+And because of all this, exulting in my young life, able to hold my
+own at work or fight, I was a rampant individualist. It was very
+natural. I was a winner. Wherefore I called the game, as I saw it
+played, or thought I saw it played, a very proper game for MEN. To
+be a MAN was to write man in large capitals on my heart. To
+adventure like a man, and fight like a man, and do a man's work
+(even for a boy's pay)--these were things that reached right in and
+gripped hold of me as no other thing could. And I looked ahead into
+long vistas of a hazy and interminable future, into which, playing
+what I conceived to be MAN'S game, I should continue to travel with
+unfailing health, without accidents, and with muscles ever vigorous.
+As I say, this future was interminable. I could see myself only
+raging through life without end like one of Nietzsche's BLOND-
+BEASTS, lustfully roving and conquering by sheer superiority and
+strength.
+
+As for the unfortunates, the sick, and ailing, and old, and maimed,
+I must confess I hardly thought of them at all, save that I vaguely
+felt that they, barring accidents, could be as good as I if they
+wanted to real hard, and could work just as well. Accidents? Well,
+they represented FATE, also spelled out in capitals, and there was
+no getting around FATE. Napoleon had had an accident at Waterloo,
+but that did not dampen my desire to be another and later Napoleon.
+Further, the optimism bred of a stomach which could digest scrap
+iron and a body which flourished on hardships did not permit me to
+consider accidents as even remotely related to my glorious
+personality.
+
+I hope I have made it clear that I was proud to be one of Nature's
+strong-armed noblemen. The dignity of labor was to me the most
+impressive thing in the world. Without having read Carlyle, or
+Kipling, I formulated a gospel of work which put theirs in the
+shade. Work was everything. It was sanctification and salvation.
+The pride I took in a hard day's work well done would be
+inconceivable to you. It is almost inconceivable to me as I look
+back upon it. I was as faithful a wage slave as ever capitalist
+exploited. To shirk or malinger on the man who paid me my wages was
+a sin, first, against myself, and second, against him. I considered
+it a crime second only to treason and just about as bad.
+
+In short, my joyous individualism was dominated by the orthodox
+bourgeois ethics. I read the bourgeois papers, listened to the
+bourgeois preachers, and shouted at the sonorous platitudes of the
+bourgeois politicians. And I doubt not, if other events had not
+changed my career, that I should have evolved into a professional
+strike-breaker, (one of President Eliot's American heroes), and had
+my head and my earning power irrevocably smashed by a club in the
+hands of some militant trades-unionist.
+
+Just about this time, returning from a seven months' voyage before
+the mast, and just turned eighteen, I took it into my head to go
+tramping. On rods and blind baggages I fought my way from the open
+West where men bucked big and the job hunted the man, to the
+congested labor centres of the East, where men were small potatoes
+and hunted the job for all they were worth. And on this new BLOND-
+BEAST adventure I found myself looking upon life from a new and
+totally different angle. I had dropped down from the proletariat
+into what sociologists love to call the "submerged tenth," and I was
+startled to discover the way in which that submerged tenth was
+recruited.
+
+I found there all sorts of men, many of whom had once been as good
+as myself and just as BLOND-BEAST; sailor-men, soldier-men, labor-
+men, all wrenched and distorted and twisted out of shape by toil and
+hardship and accident, and cast adrift by their masters like so many
+old horses. I battered on the drag and slammed back gates with
+them, or shivered with them in box cars and city parks, listening
+the while to life-histories which began under auspices as fair as
+mine, with digestions and bodies equal to and better than mine, and
+which ended there before my eyes in the shambles at the bottom of
+the Social Pit.
+
+And as I listened my brain began to work. The woman of the streets
+and the man of the gutter drew very close to me. I saw the picture
+of the Social Pit as vividly as though it were a concrete thing, and
+at the bottom of the Pit I saw them, myself above them, not far, and
+hanging on to the slippery wall by main strength and sweat. And I
+confess a terror seized me. What when my strength failed? when I
+should be unable to work shoulder to shoulder with the strong men
+who were as yet babes unborn? And there and then I swore a great
+oath. It ran something like this: ALL MY DAYS I HAVE WORKED HARD
+WITH MY BODY, AND ACCORDING TO THE NUMBER OF DAYS I HAVE WORKED, BY
+JUST THAT MUCH AM I NEARER THE BOTTOM OF THE PIT. I SHALL CLIMB OUT
+OF THE PIT, BUT NOT BY THE MUSCLES OF MY BODY SHALL I CLIMB OUT. I
+SHALL DO NO MORE HARD WORK, AND MAY GOD STRIKE ME DEAD IF I DO
+ANOTHER DAY'S HARD WORK WITH MY BODY MORE THAN I ABSOLUTELY HAVE TO
+DO. And I have been busy ever since running away from hard work.
+
+Incidentally, while tramping some ten thousand miles through the
+United States and Canada, I strayed into Niagara Falls, was nabbed
+by a fee-hunting constable, denied the right to plead guilty or not
+guilty, sentenced out of hand to thirty days' imprisonment for
+having no fixed abode and no visible means of support, handcuffed
+and chained to a bunch of men similarly circumstanced, carted down
+country to Buffalo, registered at the Erie County Penitentiary, had
+my head clipped and my budding mustache shaved, was dressed in
+convict stripes, compulsorily vaccinated by a medical student who
+practised on such as we, made to march the lock-step, and put to
+work under the eyes of guards armed with Winchester rifles--all for
+adventuring in BLOND-BEASTLY fashion. Concerning further details
+deponent sayeth not, though he may hint that some of his plethoric
+national patriotism simmered down and leaked out of the bottom of
+his soul somewhere--at least, since that experience he finds that he
+cares more for men and women and little children than for imaginary
+geographical lines.
+
+
+To return to my conversion. I think it is apparent that my rampant
+individualism was pretty effectively hammered out of me, and
+something else as effectively hammered in. But, just as I had been
+an individualist without knowing it, I was now a Socialist without
+knowing it, withal, an unscientific one. I had been reborn, but not
+renamed, and I was running around to find out what manner of thing I
+was. I ran back to California and opened the books. I do not
+remember which ones I opened first. It is an unimportant detail
+anyway. I was already It, whatever It was, and by aid of the books
+I discovered that It was a Socialist. Since that day I have opened
+many books, but no economic argument, no lucid demonstration of the
+logic and inevitableness of Socialism affects me as profoundly and
+convincingly as I was affected on the day when I first saw the walls
+of the Social Pit rise around me and felt myself slipping down,
+down, into the shambles at the bottom.
+
+
+
+Footnotes:
+
+{1} "From 43 to 52 per cent of all applicants need work rather than
+relief."--Report of the Charity Organization Society of New York
+City.
+
+{2} Mr. Leiter, who owns a coal mine at the town of Zeigler,
+Illinois, in an interview printed in the Chicago Record-Herald of
+December 6, 1904, said: "When I go into the market to purchase
+labor, I propose to retain just as much freedom as does a purchaser
+in any other kind of a market. . . . There is no difficulty whatever
+in obtaining labor, FOR THE COUNTRY IS FULL OF UNEMPLOYED MEN."
+
+{3} "Despondent and weary with vain attempts to struggle against an
+unsympathetic world, two old men were brought before Police Judge
+McHugh this afternoon to see whether some means could not be
+provided for their support, at least until springtime.
+
+"George Westlake was the first one to receive the consideration of
+the court. Westlake is seventy-two years old. A charge of habitual
+drunkenness was placed against him, and he was sentenced to a term
+in the county jail, though it is more than probable that he was
+never under the influence of intoxicating liquor in his life. The
+act on the part of the authorities was one of kindness for him, as
+in the county jail he will be provided with a good place to sleep
+and plenty to eat.
+
+"Joe Coat, aged sixty-nine years, will serve ninety days in the
+county jail for much the same reason as Westlake. He states that,
+if given a chance to do so, he will go out to a wood-camp and cut
+timber during the winter, but the police authorities realize that he
+could not long survive such a task."--From the Butte (Montana)
+Miner, December 7th, 1904.
+
+"'I end my life because I have reached the age limit, and there is
+no place for me in this world. Please notify my wife, No. 222 West
+129th Street, New York.' Having summed up the cause of his
+despondency in this final message, James Hollander, fifty-six years
+old, shot himself through the left temple, in his room at the
+Stafford Hotel today."--New York Herald.
+
+{4} In the San Francisco Examiner of November 16, 1904, there is an
+account of the use of fire-hose to drive away three hundred men who
+wanted work at unloading a vessel in the harbor. So anxious were
+the men to get the two or three hours' job that they made a
+veritable mob and had to be driven off.
+
+{5} "It was no uncommon thing in these sweatshops for men to sit
+bent over a sewing-machine continuously from eleven to fifteen hours
+a day in July weather, operating a sewing-machine by foot-power, and
+often so driven that they could not stop for lunch. The seasonal
+character of the work meant demoralizing toil for a few months in
+the year, and a not less demoralizing idleness for the remainder of
+the time. Consumption, the plague of the tenements and the especial
+plague of the garment industry, carried off many of these workers;
+poor nutrition and exhaustion, many more."--From McClure's Magazine.
+
+{6} The Social Unrest. Macmillan Company.
+
+{7} "Our Benevolent Feudalism." By W. J. Ghent. The Macmillan
+Company.
+
+{8} "The Social Unrest." By John Graham Brooks. The Macmillan
+Company.
+
+{9} From figures presented by Miss Nellie Mason Auten in the
+American Journal of Sociology, and copied extensively by the trade-
+union and Socialist press.
+
+{10} "The Bitter Cry of Outcast London."
+
+{11} An item from the Social Democratic Herald. Hundreds of these
+items, culled from current happenings, are published weekly in the
+papers of the workers.
+
+{12} Karl Marx, the great Socialist, worked out the trust
+development forty years ago, for which he was laughed at by the
+orthodox economists.
+
+
+
+
+
+End of The Project Gutenberg Etext of War of the Classes by Jack London
+