summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/10531-h
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to '10531-h')
-rw-r--r--10531-h/10531-h.htm9161
-rw-r--r--10531-h/Illus0406.jpgbin0 -> 102422 bytes
-rw-r--r--10531-h/Illus0407.jpgbin0 -> 91625 bytes
-rw-r--r--10531-h/Illus0408.jpgbin0 -> 81499 bytes
-rw-r--r--10531-h/Illus0409.jpgbin0 -> 86699 bytes
-rw-r--r--10531-h/Illus0410.jpgbin0 -> 79215 bytes
-rw-r--r--10531-h/Illus0411.jpgbin0 -> 81592 bytes
-rw-r--r--10531-h/Illus0412.jpgbin0 -> 104169 bytes
-rw-r--r--10531-h/Illus0413.jpgbin0 -> 79086 bytes
-rw-r--r--10531-h/Illus0414.jpgbin0 -> 89033 bytes
-rw-r--r--10531-h/Illus0415.jpgbin0 -> 88138 bytes
-rw-r--r--10531-h/Illus0416.jpgbin0 -> 149315 bytes
12 files changed, 9161 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/10531-h/10531-h.htm b/10531-h/10531-h.htm
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..423b25c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/10531-h/10531-h.htm
@@ -0,0 +1,9161 @@
+<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
+<html>
+<head>
+<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
+<title>The Project Gutenberg eBook of Beacon Lights of History, Volume V, by John Lord</title>
+ <style type="text/css">
+ <!--
+ * { font-family: Times;}
+ P { text-indent: 1em;
+ margin-top: .75em;
+ font-size: 14pt;
+ text-align: justify;
+ margin-bottom: .75em; }
+ H1,H2,H3,H4,H5,H6 { text-align: center; }
+ HR { width: 33%; }
+ hr.full { width: 100%; }
+ a:link {color:blue;
+ text-decoration:none}
+ link {color:blue;
+ text-decoration:none}
+ a:visited {color:blue;
+ text-decoration:none}
+ a:hover {color:red}
+ // -->
+ </style>
+</head>
+<body>
+<h1>The Project Gutenberg eBook, Beacon Lights of History, Volume V, by John Lord</h1>
+<pre>
+This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with
+almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or
+re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included
+with this eBook or online at <a href = "https://www.gutenberg.org">www.gutenberg.org</a>
+
+Title: Beacon Lights of History, Volume V
+
+Author: John Lord
+
+Release Date: December 24, 2003 [eBook #10531]
+
+Language: English
+
+Character set encoding: iso-8859-1
+
+***START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK BEACON LIGHTS OF HISTORY, VOLUME V***
+
+</pre>
+<center><h3>E-text prepared by Juliet Sutherland, Charlie Kirschner,<br>
+ and the Project Gutenberg Online Distributed Proofreading Team</h3></center>
+
+<br>
+<br>
+
+<b>
+Editorial note:<br>
+<br>
+Project Gutenberg has an earlier version of this work, which is titled
+<i>Beacon Lights of History, Volume III, part 1: The Middle
+Ages</i>.&nbsp; See E-Book#1498, <a href=
+"https://www.gutenberg.org/etext98/31blh10.txt">
+https://www.gutenberg.org/etext98/31blh10.txt</a> or
+<a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/etext98/31blh10.zip">
+https://www.gutenberg.org/etext98/31blh10.zip</a>. &nbsp; The numbering
+of volumes in the earlier set reflected the order in which the
+lectures were given.&nbsp; In the current (later) version, volumes
+were numbered to put the subjects in historical sequence.<br>
+</b>
+
+<hr class="full">
+<br><br>
+<center><i>LORD'S LECTURES</i>.</center>
+<br>
+
+<br>
+<hr style="width: 35%;"><br><br>
+<h2>BEACON LIGHTS OF HISTORY.</h2>
+
+<h2>BY JOHN LORD, LL.D.</h2>
+
+<center>AUTHOR OF &quot;THE OLD ROMAN WORLD,&quot; &quot;MODERN EUROPE,&quot;
+ETC., ETC.</center>
+<br><br>
+
+<h2>VOLUME V.</h2>
+
+<h2>THE MIDDLE AGES.</h2>
+
+
+
+<br><br><hr style="width: 35%;"><br><br>
+<h2>CONTENTS.</h2>
+
+<hr style="width: 25%;">
+
+<p><i><a href="#BEACON_LIGHTS_OF_HISTORY">MOHAMMED</a></i>.</p>
+
+<p>SARACENIC CONQUESTS.</p>
+
+Change of public opinion about Mohammed<br>
+Astonishing triumph of Mohammedanism<br>
+Old religious systems of Arabia<br>
+Polytheism succeeds the doctrines of the Magians<br>
+The necessity of reform<br>
+Early life of Mohammed<br>
+Cadijeh<br>
+Mohammed's meditations and dreams<br>
+His belief in a personal God<br>
+He preaches his new doctrines<br>
+The opposition and ridicule of his countrymen<br>
+The perseverance of Mohammed amid obstacles<br>
+His flight to Medina<br>
+The Koran and its doctrines<br>
+Change in Mohammed's mode of propagating his doctrines<br>
+Polygamy and a sensual paradise<br>
+Warlike means to convert Arabia<br>
+Mohammed accommodates his doctrines to the habits of his countrymen<br>
+Encourages martial fanaticism<br>
+Conquest of Arabia<br>
+Private life of Mohammed, after his success<br>
+Carlyle's apology for Mohammed<br>
+The conquest of Syria and Egypt<br>
+Conquest of Persia and India<br>
+Deductions in view of Saracenic conquests<br>
+Necessity of supernatural aid in the conversion of the world<br>
+Authorities<br>
+<br>
+
+<p><i><a href="#CHARLEMAGNE.">CHARLEMAGNE</a></i>.</p>
+
+<p>REVIVAL OF WESTERN EMPIRE.</p>
+
+Ancestry and early life of Charlemagne<br>
+The Merovingian princes<br>
+Condition of Europe on the accession of Charlemagne<br>
+Necessity for such a hero to arise<br>
+His perils and struggles<br>
+Wars with the Saxons<br>
+The difficulties of the Saxon conquest<br>
+Forced conversion of the Saxons<br>
+The Norman pirates<br>
+Conquest of the Avares<br>
+Unsuccessful war with the Saracens<br>
+The Lombard wars<br>
+Coronation of Charlemagne at Home<br>
+Imperialism and its influences<br>
+The dismemberment of Charlemagne's empire<br>
+Foundation of Feudalism<br>
+Charlemagne as a legislator<br>
+His alliance with the clergy<br>
+His administrative abilities<br>
+Reasons why he patronized the clergy<br>
+Results of Charlemagne's policy<br>
+Hallam's splendid eulogy<br>
+Authorities<br>
+<br>
+
+<p><i><a href="#HILDEBRAND.">HILDEBRAND</a></i>.</p>
+
+<p>THE PAPAL EMPIRE.</p>
+
+Wonderful government of the Papacy<br>
+Its vitality<br>
+Its contradictions<br>
+Its fascinations<br>
+The crimes of which it is accused<br>
+General character of the popes<br>
+Gregory VII. the most famous<br>
+His personal history<br>
+His autocratic ideas<br>
+His reign at the right time<br>
+Society in Europe in the eleventh century<br>
+Character of the clergy<br>
+The monks, and the need of reform<br>
+Character of the popes before Gregory VII.<br>
+Celibacy of the clergy<br>
+Alliance of the Papacy and Monasticism<br>
+Opposition to the reforms of Hildebrand<br>
+Terrible power of excommunication<br>
+Simony and its evils<br>
+Secularization of the clergy<br>
+Separation of spiritual from temporal power<br>
+Henry IV. of Germany<br>
+Approaching strife between Henry and Hildebrand<br>
+Their respective weapons<br>
+Henry summoned to Rome<br>
+Excommunication of Henry<br>
+Henry deserted and disarmed<br>
+Compelled to yield to Hildebrand<br>
+His great mistake<br>
+Renewed contest<br>
+Humiliation of the Pope<br>
+Moral effects of the contest<br>
+Speculations about the Papal power<br>
+Authorities<br>
+<br>
+
+<p><i><a href="#SAINT_BERNARD.">SAINT BERNARD</a></i>.</p>
+
+<p>MONASTIC INSTITUTIONS.</p>
+
+Antiquity of Monastic life<br>
+Causes which led to it<br>
+Oriental asceticism<br>
+Religious contemplation<br>
+Insoluble questions<br>
+Self-expiations<br>
+Basil the founder of Monasticism<br>
+His interesting history<br>
+Gregory Nazianzen<br>
+Vows of the monks<br>
+Their antagonism to prevailing evils<br>
+Vow of Poverty opposed to money-making<br>
+That of Chastity a protest against prevailing impurity<br>
+Origin of celibacy<br>
+Its subsequent corruption<br>
+Necessity of the vow of Obedience<br>
+Benedict and the Monastery of Monte Casino<br>
+His rules generally adopted<br>
+Lofty and useful life of the early monks<br>
+Growth and wealth of Monastic institutions<br>
+Magnificence of Mediaeval convents<br>
+Privileges of the monks<br>
+Luxury of the Benedictines<br>
+Relaxation of discipline<br>
+Degeneracy of the monks<br>
+Compared with secular clergy<br>
+Benefits which Monasticism conferred<br>
+Learning of the monks<br>
+Their common life<br>
+Revival of Learning<br>
+Rise of Scholasticism<br>
+Saint Bernard<br>
+His early piety and great attainments<br>
+His vast moral influence<br>
+His reforms and labors<br>
+Rise of Dominicans and Franciscans<br>
+Zeal of the mendicant friars<br>
+General benefits of Monastic institutions<br>
+Authorities<br>
+<br>
+
+<p><i><a href="#SAINT_ANSELM.">SAINT ANSELM</a></i>.</p>
+
+<p>MEDIAEVAL THEOLOGY.</p>
+
+Birth and early life of Anselm<br>
+The Abbey of Bec<br>
+Scholarly life of Anselm<br>
+Visits of Anselm to England<br>
+Compared with Becket<br>
+Lanfranc, Archbishop of Canterbury<br>
+Privileges of the Archbishop<br>
+Unwillingness of Anselm to be elevated<br>
+Lanfranc succeeded by Anselm<br>
+Quarrel between Anselm and William Rufus<br>
+Despotic character of William<br>
+Disputed claims of Popes Urban and Clement<br>
+Council of Rockingham<br>
+Royal efforts to depose Anselm<br>
+Firmness and heroism of Anselm<br>
+Duplicity of the king<br>
+His intrigues with the Pope<br>
+Pretended reconciliation with Anselm<br>
+Appeals to Rome<br>
+Inordinate claims of the Pope<br>
+Allegiance of Anselm to the Pope<br>
+Anselm at Rome<br>
+Death of William and Accession of Henry I.<br>
+Royal encroachments<br>
+Henry quarrels with Anselm<br>
+Results of the quarrel<br>
+Anselm as a theologian<br>
+Theology of the Middle Ages<br>
+Monks become philosophers<br>
+Gotschalk and predestination<br>
+John Scotus Erigena<br>
+Revived spirit of inquiry<br>
+Services of Anselm to theology<br>
+He brings philosophy to support theology<br>
+Combats Nominalism<br>
+His philosophical deductions<br>
+His devout Christian spirit<br>
+Authorities<br>
+<br>
+
+<p><i><a href="#THOMAS_AQUINAS.">THOMAS AQUINAS</a></i>.</p>
+
+<p>THE SCHOLASTIC PHILOSOPHY.</p>
+
+Peter Ab&eacute;lard<br>
+Gives a new impulse to philosophy<br>
+Rationalistic tendency of his teachings<br>
+The hatreds he created<br>
+Peter Lombard<br>
+His &quot;Book of Sentences&quot;<br>
+Introduction of the writings of Aristotle into Europe<br>
+University of Paris<br>
+Character of the students<br>
+Their various studies<br>
+Aristotle's logic used<br>
+The method of the Schoolmen<br>
+The Dominicans and Franciscans<br>
+Innocent III.<br>
+Thomas Aquinas<br>
+His early life and studies<br>
+Albertus Magnus<br>
+Aquinas's first great work<br>
+Made Doctor of Theology<br>
+His &quot;Summa Theologica&quot;<br>
+Its vast learning<br>
+Parallel between Aquinas and Plato<br>
+Parallel between Plato and Aristotle<br>
+Influence of Scholasticism<br>
+Waste of intellectual life<br>
+Scholasticism attractive to the Middle Ages<br>
+To be admired like a cathedral<br>
+Authorities<br>
+<br>
+
+<p><i><a href="#THOMAS_BECKET.">THOMAS BECKET</a></i>.</p>
+
+<p>PRELATICAL POWER.</p>
+
+Becket a puzzle to historians<br>
+His early history<br>
+His gradual elevation<br>
+Friendship with Henry II.<br>
+Becket made Chancellor<br>
+Elevated to the See of Canterbury<br>
+Dignity of an archbishop of Canterbury<br>
+Lanfranc<br>
+Anselm<br>
+Theobald<br>
+Becket in contrast<br>
+His ascetic habits as priest<br>
+His high-church principles<br>
+Upholds the spiritual courts<br>
+Defends the privileges of his order<br>
+Conflict with the king<br>
+Constitutions of Clarendon<br>
+Persecution of Becket<br>
+He yields at first to the king<br>
+His repentance<br>
+Defection of the bishops<br>
+Becket escapes to the Continent<br>
+Supported by Louis VII. of France<br>
+Insincerity of the Pope<br>
+Becket at Pontigny in exile<br>
+His indignant rebuke of the Pope<br>
+Who excommunicates the Archbishop of York<br>
+Henry obliged to compromise<br>
+Hollow reconciliation with Becket<br>
+Return of Becket to Canterbury<br>
+His triumphal procession<br>
+Annoyance of Henry<br>
+Assassination of Becket<br>
+Consequences of the murder<br>
+Authorities<br>
+<br>
+
+<p><i><a href="#THE_FEUDAL_SYSTEM.">THE FEUDAL SYSTEM</a></i>.</p>
+
+Anarchies of the Merovingian period<br>
+Society on the dissolution of Charlemagne's empire<br>
+Allodial tenure<br>
+Origin of Feudalism<br>
+Dependence and protection the principles of Feudalism<br>
+Peasants and their masters<br>
+The sentiment of loyalty<br>
+Contentment of the peasantry<br>
+Evils that cannot be redressed<br>
+Submission to them a necessity<br>
+Division of Charlemagne's empire<br>
+Life of the nobles<br>
+Pleasures and habits of feudal barons<br>
+Aristocratic character of Feudalism<br>
+Slavery of the people<br>
+Indirect blessings of Feudalism<br>
+Slavery not an unmixed evil<br>
+Influence of chivalry<br>
+Devotion to woman<br>
+The lady of the baronial castle<br>
+Reasons why women were worshipped<br>
+Dignity of the baronial home<br>
+The Christian woman contrasted with the pagan<br>
+Glory and beauty of Chivalry<br>
+Authorities<br>
+<br>
+
+<p><i><a href="#THE_CRUSADES.">THE CRUSADES</a></i>.</p>
+
+The Crusades the great external event of the Middle Ages<br>
+A semi-religious and semi-military movement<br>
+What gives interest to wars?<br>
+Wars the exponents of prevailing ideas<br>
+The overruling of all wars<br>
+The majesty of Providence seen in war<br>
+Origin of the Crusades<br>
+Pilgrimages to Jerusalem<br>
+Miseries and insults of the pilgrims<br>
+Intense hatred of Mohammedanism<br>
+Peter of Amiens<br>
+Council of Clermont<br>
+The First Crusade<br>
+Its miseries and mistakes<br>
+The Second Crusade<br>
+The Third Crusade<br>
+The Fourth, Children's, Fifth, and Sixth Crusades<br>
+The Seventh Crusade<br>
+All alike unsuccessful, and wasteful of life and energies<br>
+Peculiarities and immense mistakes of the Crusaders<br>
+The moral evils of the Crusades<br>
+Ultimate results of the Crusades<br>
+Barrier made against Mohammedan conquests<br>
+Political necessity of the Crusades<br>
+Their effect in weakening the Feudal system<br>
+Effect of the Crusades on the growth of cities<br>
+On commerce and art and literature<br>
+They scatter the germs of a new civilization<br>
+They centralize power<br>
+They ultimately elevate the European races<br>
+Authorities<br>
+<br>
+
+<p><i><a href="#WILLIAM_OF_WYKEHAM.">WILLIAM OF WYKEHAM</a></i>.</p>
+
+<p>GOTHIC ARCHITECTURE.</p>
+
+Roman architecture
+First form of a Christian church<br>
+The change to the Romanesque<br>
+Its peculiarities<br>
+Its connection with Monasticism<br>
+Gloomy aspect of the churches of the tenth and eleventh centuries<br>
+Effect of the Crusades on church architecture<br>
+Church architecture becomes cheerful<br>
+The Gothic churches of France and Germany<br>
+The English Mediaeval churches<br>
+Glories of the pointed arch<br>
+Effect of the Renaissance on architecture<br>
+Mongrel style of the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries<br>
+Revival of the pure gothic<br>
+Churches should be adapted to their uses<br>
+Incongruity of Protestantism with ritualistic architecture<br>
+Protestantism demands a church for preaching<br>
+Gothic vaults unfavorable to oratory<br>
+Authorities<br>
+<br>
+
+<p><i><a href="#JOHN_WYCLIF.">JOHN WYCLIF</a></i>.</p>
+
+<p>DAWN OF THE REFORMATION.</p>
+
+Harmony of Protestant and Mediaeval creeds<br>
+The Reformation a moral movement<br>
+The evils of Papal institutions<br>
+The evils of monastic life<br>
+Quarrels and dissoluteness of monks<br>
+Birth of Wyclif<br>
+His scholastic attainments and honors<br>
+His political influence<br>
+The powers who have ruled the world<br>
+Wyclif sent on a mission to Bruges<br>
+Protection of John of Gaunt<br>
+Wyclif summoned to an ecclesiastical council<br>
+His defenders and foes<br>
+Triumph of Wyclif<br>
+He openly denounces the Pope<br>
+His translation of the Bible<br>
+Opposition to it by the higher clergy<br>
+Hostility of Roman Catholicism to the right of private judgment<br>
+Hostility to the Bible in vernacular tongues<br>
+Spread of the Bible in English<br>
+Wyclif as a doctrinal reformer<br>
+He attacks Transubstantiation<br>
+Deserted by the Duke of Lancaster<br>
+But dies peaceably in his parish<br>
+Wyclif contrasted with Luther<br>
+His great services to the church<br>
+Reasons why he escaped martyrdom<br>
+Authorities<br>
+<br>
+
+<p>LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS</p>
+
+<p>VOLUME V.</p>
+
+<a href="Illus0406.jpg">Roland Calls for Succor in the Battle of Roncesvalles</a>
+<i>After the painting by Louis Guesnet</i>.<br>
+
+<a href="Illus0407.jpg">A Reading from the Koran</a>
+<i>After the painting by W. Gentz</i>.<br>
+
+<a href="Illus0408.jpg">Mohammed, Preaching the Unity of God, Enters the City of Mecca</a>
+<i>After the painting by A. M&uuml;ller</i>.<br>
+
+<a href="Illus0409.jpg">Charlemagne Inflicts the Rite of Baptism on the Saxons</a>
+<i>After the painting by Adolph Maria Mucha</i>.<br>
+
+<a href="Illus0410.jpg">St. Bernard Counselling Conrad III.</a>
+<i>After the painting by Adolph Maria Mucha</i>.<br>
+
+<a href="Illus0411.jpg">Canterbury Cathedral</a>
+<i>From a photograph</i>.<br>
+
+<a href="Illus0412.jpg">St. Thomas Aquinas in the School of Albertus Magnus</a>
+<i>After the painting by H. Lerolle</i>.<br>
+
+<a href="Illus0413.jpg">Murder of St. Thomas &agrave; Becket</a>
+<i>After the painting by A. Dawant</i>.<br>
+
+<a href="Illus0414.jpg">The Accolade</a>
+<i>After the painting by Sir E. Blair Leighton</i>.<br>
+
+<a href="Illus0415.jpg">Winchester Cathedral</a>
+<i>From a photograph</i>.<br>
+
+<a href="Illus0416.jpg">Facsimile of Page from Wyclif Bible</a><br>
+
+
+
+<br><br><hr style="width: 35%;"><br><br>
+<h2><a name="BEACON_LIGHTS_OF_HISTORY"></a>BEACON LIGHTS OF HISTORY</h2>
+
+<hr style="width: 25%;">
+
+<h2>MOHAMMED.<a name="FNanchor1"></a><a href="#Footnote_1"><sup>[1]</sup></a></h2>
+
+<hr style="width: 25%;">
+
+<p>A.D. 570-632.</p>
+
+<p>SARACENIC CONQUESTS.</p>
+
+<a name="Footnote_1"></a><a href="#FNanchor1">[1]</a> Spelled also <i>Mahomet</i>, <i>Mahommed</i>; but I prefer Mohammed.
+
+<p>The most extraordinary man who arose after the fall of the Roman Empire
+was doubtless Mohammed; and his posthumous influence has been greater
+than that of any man since Christianity was declared, if we take into
+account the number of those who have received his doctrines. Even
+Christianity never had so rapid a spread. More than a sixth part of the
+human race are the professed followers of the Arabian prophet.</p>
+
+<p>In regard to Mohammed himself, a great change has taken place in the
+opinions of critics within fifty years. It was the fashion half a
+century ago to speak of this man as a hypocrite, an impostor, even as
+Antichrist. Now he is generally regarded as a reformer; that is, as a
+man who introduced into Arabia a religion and a morality superior to
+what previously existed, and he is regarded as an impostor only so far
+as he was visionary. Few critics doubt his sincerity. He was no
+hypocrite, since he himself believed in his mission; and his mission was
+benevolent,--to turn his countrymen from a gross polytheism to the
+worship of one God. Although his religion cannot compare with
+Christianity in purity and loftiness, yet it enforced a higher morality
+than the old Arabian religions, and assimilated to Christianity in many
+important respects. The chief fault we have to find in Mohammed was, the
+propagation of his doctrines by the sword, and the use of wicked means
+to bring about a good end. The truths he declared have had an immense
+influence on Asiatic nations, and these have given vitality to his
+system, if we accept the position that truth alone has vitality.</p>
+
+<p>One remarkable fact stands out for the world to ponder,--that, for more
+than fourteen hundred years, one hundred and eighty millions (more than
+a sixth part of the human race) have adopted and cherished the religion
+of Mohammed; that Christianity never had so astonishing a triumph; and
+that even the adherents of Christianity, in many countries, have not
+manifested the zeal of the Mohammedans in most of the countries where it
+has been acknowledged. Now these startling facts can be explained only
+on the ground that Mohammedanism has great vital religious and moral
+truths underlying its system which appeal to the consciousness of
+mankind, or else that these truths are so blended with dangerous errors
+which appeal to depraved passions and interests, that the religion
+spread in consequence of these errors rather than of the truth itself.</p>
+
+<p>The question to be considered, then, is whether Mohammedanism spread in
+consequence of its truths or in consequence of its errors.</p>
+
+<p>In order to appreciate the influence of the Arabian prophet, we are
+first led into the inquiry whether his religion was really an
+improvement on the old systems which previously prevailed in Arabia. If
+it was, he must be regarded as a benefactor and reformer, even if we
+admit the glaring evils of his system, when measured by the purer
+religion of the Cross. And it then simply becomes a question whether it
+is better to have a prevalent corrupted system of religion containing
+many important truths, or a system of downright paganism with few
+truths at all.</p>
+
+<p>In examining the religious systems of Arabia in the age preceding the
+advent of the Prophet, it would seem that the most prominent of them
+were the old doctrines of the Magians and Sabaeans, blended with a gross
+idolatry and a senseless polytheism. Whatever may have been the faith of
+the ancient Sabaean sages, who noted the aspects of the stars, and
+supposed they were inhabited by angels placed there by Almighty power to
+supervise and govern the universe, yet history seems to record that
+this ancient faith was practically subverted, and that the stars, where
+were supposed to dwell deities to whom prayers were made, became
+themselves objects of worship, and even graven images were made in honor
+of them. Among the Arabs each tribe worshipped a particular star, and
+set up its particular idol, so that a degrading polytheism was the
+religion of the land. The object of greatest veneration was the
+celebrated Black Stone, at Mecca, fabled to have fallen from heaven at
+the same time with Adam. Over this stone was built the Kaabah, a small
+oblong stone building, around which has been since built the great
+mosque. It was ornamented with three hundred and sixty idols. The
+guardianship of this pagan temple was intrusted to the most ancient and
+honorable families of Mecca, and to it resorted innumerable pilgrims
+bringing precious offerings. It was like the shrine of Delphi, as a
+source of profit to its fortunate guardians.</p>
+
+<p>Thus before Mohammed appeared polytheism was the prevalent religion of
+Arabia,--a degradation even from the ancient Sabaean faith. It is true
+there were also other religions. There were many Jews at Medina; and
+there was also a corrupted form of Christianity in many places, split up
+into hostile and wrangling sects, with but little of the spirit of the
+divine Founder, with innumerable errors and superstitions, so that in no
+part of the world was Christianity so feeble a light. But the great
+body of the people were pagans. A marked reform was imperatively needed
+to restore the belief in the unity of God and set up a higher standard
+of morality.</p>
+
+<p>It is claimed that Mohammed brought such a reform. He was born in the
+year 570, of the family of Hashem and the tribe of Koreish, to whom was
+intrusted the keeping of the Black Stone. He therefore belonged to the
+highest Arabian aristocracy. Early left an orphan and in poverty, he was
+reared in the family of one of his uncles, under all the influences of
+idolatry. This uncle was a merchant, and the youth made long journeys
+with him to distant fairs, especially in Syria, where he probably became
+acquainted with the Holy Scriptures, especially with the Old Testament.
+In his twenty-fifth year he entered the service of Cadijeh, a very
+wealthy widow, who sent to the fairs and towns great caravans, which
+Mohammed accompanied in some humble capacity,--according to the
+tradition as camel-driver. But his personal beauty, which was
+remarkable, and probably also his intelligence and spirit, won the heart
+of this powerful mistress, and she became his wife.</p>
+
+<p>He was now second to none in the capital of Arabia, and great thoughts
+began to fill his soul. His wife perceived his greatness, and, like
+Josephine and the wife of Disraeli, forwarded the fortunes of her
+husband, for he became rich as well as intellectual and noble, and thus
+had time and leisure to accomplish more easily his work. From
+twenty-five to forty he led chiefly a contemplative life, spending
+months together in a cave, absorbed in his grand reflections,--at
+intervals issuing from his retreat, visiting the marts of commerce, and
+gaining knowledge from learned men. It is seldom that very great men
+lead either a life of perpetual contemplation or of perpetual activity.
+Without occasional rest, and leisure to mature knowledge, no man can arm
+himself with the weapons of the gods. To be truly great, a man must
+blend a life of activity with a life of study,--like Moses, who matured
+the knowledge he had gained in Egypt amid the deserts of Midian.</p>
+
+<p>With all great men some leading idea rules the ordinary life. The idea
+which took possession of the mind of Mohammed was the degrading
+polytheism of his countrymen, the multitude of their idols, the
+grossness of their worship, and the degrading morals which usually
+accompany a false theology. He set himself to work to produce a reform,
+but amid overwhelming obstacles. He talked with his uncles, and they
+laughed at him. They would not even admit the necessity of a reform.
+Only Cadijeh listened to him and encouraged him and believed in him. And
+Mohammed was ever grateful for this mark of confidence, and cherished
+the memory of his wife in his subsequent apostasy,--if it be true that
+he fell, like Solomon. Long afterwards, when she was dead, Ay&eacute;sha, his
+young and favorite wife, thus addressed him: &quot;Am I not better than
+Cadijeh? Do you not love me better than you did her? She was a widow,
+old and ugly.&quot; &quot;No, by Allah!&quot; replied the Prophet; &quot;she believed in me
+when no one else did. In the whole world I had but one friend, and she
+was that friend.&quot; No woman ever retained the affections of a husband
+superior to herself, unless she had the spirit of Cadijeh,--unless she
+proved herself his friend, and believed in him. How miserable the life
+of Jane Carlyle would have been had she not been proud of her husband!
+One reason why there is frequent unhappiness in married life is because
+there is no mutual appreciation. How often have we seen a noble, lofty,
+earnest man fettered and chained by a frivolous woman who could not be
+made to see the dignity and importance of the labors which gave to her
+husband all his real power! Not so with the woman who assisted Mohammed.
+Without her sympathy and faith he probably would have failed. He told
+her, and her alone, his dreams, his ecstasies, his visions; how that God
+at different times had sent prophets and teachers to reveal new truths,
+by whom religion had been restored; how this one God, who created the
+heavens and the earth, had never left Himself without witnesses of His
+truth in the most degenerate times; how that the universal recognition
+of this sovereign Power and Providence was necessary to the salvation
+of society. He had learned much from the study of the Talmud and the
+Jewish Scriptures; he had reflected deeply in his isolated cave; he knew
+that there was but one supreme God, and that there could be no elevated
+morality without the sense of personal responsibility to Him; that
+without the fear of this one God there could be neither wisdom
+nor virtue.</p>
+
+<p>Hence his soul burned to tell his countrymen his earnest belief in a
+supreme and personal God, to whom alone prayers should be made, and who
+alone could rescue by His almighty power. He pondered day and night on
+this single and simple truth. His perpetual meditations and ascetic
+habits induced dreams and ecstasies, such as marked primitive monks, and
+Loyola in his Manresan cave. He became a visionary man, but most
+intensely earnest, for his convictions were overwhelming. He fancied
+himself the ambassador of this God, as the ancient Jewish prophets were;
+that he was even greater than they, his mission being to remove
+idolatry,--to his mind the greatest evil under the sun, since it was the
+root of all vices and follies. Idolatry is either a defiance or a
+forgetfulness of God,--high treason to the majesty of Heaven, entailing
+the direst calamities.</p>
+
+<p>At last, one day, in his fortieth year, after he had been shut up a
+whole month in solitude, so that his soul was filled with ecstasy and
+enthusiasm, he declared to Cadijeh that the night before, while wrapped
+in his mantle, absorbed in reverie, a form of divine beauty, in a flood
+of light, appeared to him, and, in the name of the Almighty who created
+the heavens and the earth, thus spake: &quot;O, Mohammed! of a truth thou art
+the Prophet of God, and I am his angel Gabriel.&quot; &quot;This,&quot; says Carlyle,
+&quot;is the soul of Islam. This is what Mohammed felt and now declared to be
+of infinite moment, that idols and formulas were nothing; that the
+jargon of argumentative Greek sects, the vague traditions of Jews, the
+stupid routine of Arab idolatry were a mockery and a delusion; that
+there is but one God; that we must let idols alone and look to Him. He
+alone is reality; He made us and sustains us. Our whole strength lies in
+submission to Him. The thing He sends us, be it death even, is good, is
+the best. We resign ourselves to Him.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>Such were the truths which Mohammed, with preternatural earnestness, now
+declared,--doctrines which would revolutionize Arabia. And why not? They
+are the same substantially which Moses declared to those sensual and
+degraded slaves whom he led out of Egypt,--yea, the doctrines of David
+and of Job. &quot;Though He slay me, yet will I trust in Him.&quot; What a grand
+and all-important truth it is to impress upon people sunk in
+forgetfulness and sensuality and pleasure-seeking and idle schemes of
+vanity and ambition, that there is a supreme Intelligence who overrules,
+and whose laws cannot be violated with impunity; from whom no one can
+escape, even though he &quot;take the wings of the morning and fly to the
+uttermost parts of the sea.&quot; This is the one truth that Moses sought to
+plant in the minds of the Jews,--a truth always forgotten when there is
+slavery to epicurean pleasures or a false philosophy.</p>
+
+<p>Now I maintain that Mohammed, in seeking to impress his degenerate
+countrymen with the idea of the one supreme God, amid a most degrading
+and almost universal polytheism, was a great reformer. In preaching this
+he was neither fanatic nor hypocrite; he was a very great man, and thus
+far a good man. He does not make an original revelation; he reproduces
+an old truth,--as old as the patriarchs, as old as Job, as old as the
+primitive religions,--but an exceedingly important one, lost sight of by
+his countrymen, gradually lost sight of by all peoples when divine grace
+is withheld; indeed practically by people in Christian lands in times of
+great degeneracy. &quot;The fool has said in his heart there is no God;&quot; or,
+Let there be no God, that we may eat and drink before we die.
+Epicureanism, in its pleasures or in its speculations, is virtually
+atheism. It was so in Greece. It is so with us.</p>
+
+<p>Mohammed was now at the mature age of forty, in the fulness of his
+powers, in the prime of his life; and he began to preach everywhere
+that there is but one God. Few, however, believed in him. Why not
+acknowledge such a fundamental truth, appealing to the intellect as well
+as the moral sense? But to confess there is a supreme God, who rewards
+and punishes, and to whom all are responsible both for words and
+actions, is to imply a confession of sinfulness and the justice of
+retribution. Those degraded Arabians would not receive willingly such a
+truth as this, even as the Israelites ever sought to banish it from
+their hearts and minds, in spite of their deliverance from slavery. The
+uncles and friends of Mohammed treated his mission with scorn and
+derision. Nor do I read that the common people heard him gladly, as they
+listened to the teachings of Christ. Zealously he labored for three
+years with all classes; and yet in three years of exalted labor, with
+all his eloquence and fervor and sincerity, he converted only about
+thirteen persons, one of whom was his slave. Think of such a man
+declaring such a truth, and only gaining thirteen followers in three
+years! How sickened must have been his enthusiastic soul! His worldly
+relatives urged him to silence. Why attack idols; why quarrel with his
+own interests; why destroy his popularity? Then exclaimed that great
+hero: &quot;If the sun stood on my right hand, and the moon on my left,
+ordering me to hold my peace, I would still declare there is but one
+God,&quot;--a speech rivalled only by Luther at the Diet of Worms. Why urge
+a great man to be silent on the very thing which makes him great? He
+cannot be silent. His truth--from which he cannot be separated--is
+greater than life or death, or principalities or powers.</p>
+
+<p>Buffeted and ridiculed, still Mohammed persevered. He used at first only
+moral means. He appealed only to the minds and hearts of the people,
+encouraged by his few believers and sustained by the fancied voice of
+that angel who appeared to him in his retreat. But his earnest voice was
+drowned by discordant noises. He was regarded as a lunatic, a demented
+man, because he professed to believe in a personal God. The angry mob
+covered his clothes with dust and ashes. They demanded miracles. But at
+this time he had only truths to declare,--those saving truths which are
+perpetual miracles. At last hostilities began. He was threatened and he
+was persecuted. They laid plots to take his life. He sought shelter in
+the castle of his uncle, Abu Taleh; but he died. Then Mohammed's wife
+Cadijeh died. The priests of an idolatrous religion became furious. He
+had laid his hands on their idols. He was regarded as a disorganizer, an
+innovator, a most dangerous man. His fortunes became darker and darker;
+he was hated, persecuted, and alone.</p>
+
+<p>Thus thirteen years passed away in reproach, in persecution, in fear. At
+last forty picked men swore to assassinate him. Should he remain at
+Mecca and die, before his mission was accomplished, or should he fly? He
+concluded to fly to Medina, where there were Jews, and some nominal
+converts to Christianity,--a new ground. This was in the year 622, and
+the flight is called the Hegira,--from which the East dates its era, in
+the fifty-third year of the Prophet's life. In this city he was
+cordially welcomed, and he soon found himself surrounded with
+enthusiastic followers. He built a mosque, and openly performed the
+rites of the new religion.</p>
+
+<p>At this era a new phase appears in the Prophet's life and teachings.
+Thus far, until his flight, it would seem that he propagated his
+doctrines by moral force alone, and that these doctrines, in the main,
+were elevated. He had earnestly declared his great idea of the unity of
+God. He had pronounced the worship of images to be idolatrous. He held
+idolatry of all kinds in supreme abhorrence. He enjoined charity,
+justice, and forbearance. He denounced all falsehood and all deception,
+especially in trade. He declared that humility, benevolence, and
+self-abnegation were the greatest virtues. He commanded his disciples to
+return good for evil, to restrain the passions, to bridle the tongue, to
+be patient under injuries, to be submissive to God. He enjoined prayer,
+fastings, and meditation as a means of grace. He laid down the necessity
+of rest on the seventh day. He copied the precepts of the Bible in many
+of their essential features, and recognized its greatest teachers as
+inspired prophets.</p>
+
+<p>It was during these thirteen years at Mecca, amid persecution and
+ridicule, and with few outward successes, that he probably wrote the
+Koran,--a book without beginning and without end, <i>disjecta membra</i>,
+regardless of all rules of art, full of repetitions, and yet full of
+lofty precepts and noble truths of morality evidently borrowed from the
+Jewish Scriptures,--in which his great ideas stand out with singular
+eloquence and impressiveness: the unity of God, His divine sovereignty,
+the necessity of prayer, the soul's immortality, future rewards and
+punishments. His own private life had been blameless. It was plain and
+simple. For a whole month he did not light a fire to cook his food. He
+swept his chamber himself and mended his own clothes. His life was that
+of an ascetic enthusiast, profoundly impressed with the greatness and
+dignity of his mission. Thus far his greatest error and fault was in the
+supposition that he was inspired in the same sense as the ancient Jewish
+prophets were inspired,--to declare the will and the truth of God. Any
+man leading such a life of contemplative asceticism and retirement is
+prone to fall into the belief of special divine illumination. It
+characterized George Fox, the Anabaptists, Ignatius Loyola, Saint
+Theresa, and even, to some extent, Oliver Cromwell himself. Mohammed's
+supreme error was that he was the greatest as well as the last of the
+prophets. This was fanaticism, but he was probably honest in the belief.
+His brain was turned by dreams, ecstasies, and ascetic devotions. But
+with all his visionary ideas of his call, his own morality and his
+teachings had been lofty, and apparently unsuccessful. Possibly he was
+discouraged with the small progress he had made,--disgusted,
+irritated, fierce.</p>
+
+<p>Certainly, soon after he was established at Medina, a great change took
+place in his mode of propagating his doctrines. His great ideas remained
+the same, but he adopted a new way to spread them. So that I can almost
+fancy that some Mephistopheles, some form of Satanic agency, some lying
+Voice whispered to him in this wise: &quot;O Mohammed! of a truth thou art
+the Prophet of the living God. Thou hast declared the grandest truths
+ever uttered in Arabia; but see how powerless they are on the minds and
+hearts of thy countrymen, with all thy eloquence, sincerity, and fervor.
+By moral means thou hast effected comparatively nothing. Thou hast
+preached thirteen years, and only made a few converts. Thy truths are
+too elevated for a corrupt and wicked generation to accept. Even thine
+own life is in danger. Thou hast been obliged to fly to these barren
+rocks and sands. Thou hast failed. Why not pursue a new course, and
+adapt thy doctrines to men as they are? Thy countrymen are wild,
+fierce, and warlike: why not incite their martial passions in defence of
+thy doctrines? They are an earnest people, and, believing in the truths
+which thou now declarest, they will fight for them and establish them by
+the sword, not merely in Arabia, but throughout the East. They are a
+pleasure-loving and imaginative people: why not promise the victors of
+thy faith a sensual bliss in Paradise? They will not be subverters of
+your grand truths; they will simply extend them, and jealously, if they
+have a reward in what their passions crave. In short, use the proper
+means for a great end. The end justifies the means.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>Whether influenced by such specious sophistries, or disheartened by his
+former method, or corrupted in his own heart, as Solomon was, by his
+numerous wives,--for Mohammed permitted polygamy and practised it
+himself,--it is certain that he now was bent on achieving more signal
+and rapid victories. He resolved to adapt his religion to the depraved
+hearts of his followers. He would mix up truth with error; he would make
+truth palatable; he would use the means which secure success. It was
+success he wanted, and success he thus far had not secured. He was
+ambitious; he would become a mighty spiritual potentate.</p>
+
+<p>So he allowed polygamy,--the vice of Eastern nations from remote
+periods; he promised a sensual Paradise to those who should die in
+defence of his religion; he inflamed the imagination of the Arabians
+with visions of sensual joys. He painted heaven as a land whose soil was
+the finest wheaten flour, whose air was fragrant with perfumes, whose
+streams were of crystal water or milk or wine or honey, flowing over
+beds of musk and camphor,--a glorious garden of fruits and flowers,
+whose inhabitants were clothed in garments of gold, sparkling with
+rubies and diamonds, who reclined in sumptuous palaces and silken
+pavilions, and on couches of voluptuous ease, and who were served with
+viands which could be eaten without satiety, and liquors which could be
+drunk without inebriation; yea, where the blissful warrior for the faith
+should enjoy an unending youth, and where he would be attended by
+houris, with black and loving eyes, free from all defects, resplendent
+in beauty and grace, and rejoicing in perpetual charms.</p>
+
+<p>Such were the views, it is maintained, with which he inflamed the
+faithful. And, more, he encouraged them to take up arms, and penetrate,
+as warlike missionaries, to the utmost bounds of the habitable
+world, in order to convert men to the faith of the one God, whose
+Prophet he claimed to be. Moreover, he made new and extraordinary
+&quot;revelations,&quot;--that he had ascended into the seventh heaven and held
+converse with Gabriel; and he now added to his creed that old lie of
+Eastern theogonies, that base element of all false religions,--that man
+can propitiate the Deity by works of supererogation; that man can
+purchase by ascetic labors and sacrifices his future salvation. This
+falsity enters largely into Mohammedanism. I need not add how discrepant
+it is with the cheerful teachings of the apostles, especially to the
+poor, as seen in the deeds of penance, prayers in the corners of the
+streets, the ablutions, the fasts, and the pilgrimages to which the
+faithful are exhorted. And moreover he accommodated his fasts and feasts
+and holidays and pilgrimages to the old customs of the people, thereby
+teaching lessons of worldly wisdom. Astarte, the old object of Sabaean
+idolatry, was particularly worshipped on a Friday; and this day was made
+the Mohammedan Sabbath. Again, the month Rhamad&aacute;n, from time immemorial,
+had been set apart for fastings; this month the Prophet adopted,
+declaring that in it he had received his first revelations. Pilgrimages
+to the Black Stone were favorite forms of penance; and this was
+perpetuated in the pilgrimages to Mecca.</p>
+
+<p>Thus it would appear that Mohammed, after his flight, accommodated his
+doctrines to the customs and tastes of his countrymen,--blending with
+the sublime truths he declared subtile and pernicious errors. The Jesuit
+missionaries did the same thing in China and Japan, thinking more of the
+number of their converts than of the truth itself. Expediency--the
+accepted Jesuitical principle of the end justifying the means--is seen
+in almost everything in this world which blazes with success. It is seen
+in politics, in philanthropy, in ecclesiasticism, and in education.
+There are political Jesuits and philanthropical Jesuits and Protestant
+Jesuits, as well as Catholic Jesuits and Mohammedan Jesuits. What do you
+think of a man, wearing the livery of a gospel minister, devoting all
+his energies to money-making, versed in the ways of the &quot;heathen
+Chinee,&quot;--&quot;ways that are dark, and tricks that are vain,&quot;--all to
+succeed better in worldly thrift, using all means for that single
+end,--is not he practically a Jesuit? I do not mean a Catholic Jesuit,
+belonging to the Society of Jesus, but popularly what we mean by a
+Jesuit. What would you think of a college which lowered the standard of
+education in order to draw students, or selected, as the guardians of
+its higher interests, those men who would contribute the most money to
+its funds?</p>
+
+<p>This spirit of expediency Mohammed entertained and utilized, in order to
+gain success. Most of what is false in Mohammedanism is based on
+expediency. The end was not lost sight of,--the conversion of his
+countrymen to the belief in the unity and sovereignty of God, but it was
+sought by means which would make them fanatics or pharisees. He was not
+such a miserable creature as one who seeks to make money by trading on
+the religious capital of the community; but he did adapt his religion to
+the passions and habits of the people in order that they might more
+readily be led to accept it. He listened to that same wicked Voice which
+afterwards appeared in the guise of an angel of light to mediaeval
+ritualists. And it is thus that Satan has contrived to pervert the best
+institutions of the world. The moment good men look to outward and
+superficial triumphs, to the disregard of inward purity, that moment do
+they accept the Jesuitical lie of all ages,--&quot;The end justifies
+the means.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>But the worst thing which the Prophet did in order to gain his end was
+to make use of the sword. For thirteen years he appealed to conscience.
+Now he makes it an inducement for men to fight for his great idea.
+&quot;Different prophets,&quot; said he, in his memorable manifesto, &quot;have been
+sent by God to illustrate His different attributes: Moses, His
+providence; Solomon, His wisdom; Christ, His righteousness; but I, the
+last of the prophets, am sent with the sword. Let those who promulgate
+my faith enter into no arguments or discussions, but slay all who refuse
+obedience. Whoever fights for the true faith, whether he fall or
+conquer, will assuredly receive a glorious reward, for the sword is the
+key of heaven. All who draw it in defence of the faith shall receive
+temporal and future blessings. Every drop of their blood, every peril
+and hardship, will be registered on high as more meritorious than
+fasting or prayer. If they fall in battle their sins will be washed
+away, and they shall be transported into Paradise, to revel in eternal
+pleasures, and in the arms of black-eyed houris.&quot; Thus did he stimulate
+the martial fanaticism of a warlike and heroic people with the promise
+of future happiness. What a monstrous expediency,--worse than all the
+combined usurpations of the popes!</p>
+
+<p>And what was the result? I need not point to the successive conquests of
+the Saracens with such a mighty stimulus. They were loyal to the truth
+for which they fought. They never afterwards became idolaters; but their
+religion was built up on the miseries of nations. To propagate the faith
+of Mohammed they overran the world. Never were conquests more rapid and
+more terrible.</p>
+
+<p>At first Mohammed's followers in Medina sallied out and attacked the
+caravans of Arabia, and especially all belonging to Mecca (the city
+which had rejected him), until all the various tribes acknowledged the
+religion of the Prophet, for they were easily converted to a faith which
+flattered their predatory inclinations and promised them future
+immunities. The first cavalcade which entered Medina with spoils made
+Mussulmans of all the inhabitants, and gave Mohammed the control of the
+city. The battle of Moat gave him a triumphal entrance into Mecca. He
+soon found himself the sovereign of all Arabia; and when he died, at the
+age of 63, in the eleventh year after his Hegira, or flight from Mecca,
+he was the most successful founder of a religion the world has known,
+next to Buddha. A religion appealing to truth alone had made only a few
+converts in thirteen years; a religion which appealed to the sword had
+made converts of a great nation in eleven years.</p>
+
+<p>It is difficult to ascertain what the private life of the Prophet was in
+these years of dazzling success. The authorities differ. Some represent
+him as sunk in a miserable sensuality which shortened his days. But I
+think this statement may be doubted. He never lost the veneration of his
+countrymen,--and no veneration can last for a man steeped in sensuality.
+Even Solomon lost his prestige and popularity when he became vain and
+sensual. Those who were nearest to the Prophet reverenced him most
+profoundly. With his wife Ay&eacute;sha he lived with great frugality. He was
+kindly, firm in friendship, faithful and tender in his family, ready to
+forgive enemies, just in decision. The caliphs who succeeded him, for
+some time, were men of great simplicity, and sought to imitate his
+virtues. He was doubtless warlike and fanatical, but conquests such as
+he and his successors made are incompatible with luxury and effeminacy.
+He stands arraigned at the bar of eternal justice for perverting truth,
+for blending it with error, for making use of wicked means to accomplish
+what he deemed a great end.</p>
+
+<p>I have no patience with Mr. Carlyle, great and venerable as is his
+authority, for seeming to justify Mohammed in assuming the sword. &quot;I
+care little for the sword,&quot; says this sophistical writer. &quot;I will allow
+a thing to struggle for itself in this world, with any sword or tongue
+or implement it has or can lay hold on. What is better than itself it
+cannot put away, but only what is worse. In this great life-duel Nature
+herself is umpire, and can do no wrong,&quot; That is, might makes right;
+only evil perishes in the conflict of principles; whatever prevails is
+just. In other words, if Mohammedanism, by any means it may choose to
+use, proves itself more formidable than other religions, then it ought
+to prevail. Suppose that the victories of the Saracens had extended over
+Europe, as well as Asia and Africa,--had not been arrested by Charles
+Martel,--would Carlyle then have preferred Mohammedanism to the
+Christianity of degenerate nations? Was Mohammedanism a better religion
+than the Christianity which existed in Asia Minor and in various parts
+of the Greek empire in the sixth and seventh centuries? Was it a good
+thing to convert the church of Saint Sophia into a Saracenic mosque, and
+the city of the later Christian emperors into the capital of the Turks?
+Is a united Saracenic empire better than a divided, wrangling
+Christian empire?</p>
+
+<p>But I will not enter upon that discussion. I confine myself to facts. It
+is certain that Mohammedanism, by means of the sword, spread with
+marvellous and unprecedented rapidity. The successors of the Prophet
+carried their conquests even to India. Neither the Syrians nor the
+Egyptians could cope with men who felt that the sacrifice of life in
+battle would secure an eternity of bliss. The armies of the Greek
+emperor melted away before the generals of the caliph. The Cross waned
+before the Crescent. The banners of the Moslems floated over the
+proudest battlements of ancient Roman grandeur.</p>
+
+<p>In the fifth year of the caliph Omar, only seventeen years from the
+Prophet's flight from Mecca, the conquest of Syria was completed. The
+Christians were forbidden to build churches, or speak openly of their
+religion, or sit in the presence of a Mohammedan, or to sell wine, or
+bear arms, or use the saddle in riding, or have a domestic who had been
+in the Mohammedan service. The utter prostration of all civil and
+religious liberty took place in the old scenes of Christian triumph.
+This was an instance in which persecution proved successful; and because
+it was successful it is a proof, in the eyes of Carlyle, that the
+persecuting religion was the better, because it was outwardly
+the stronger.</p>
+
+<p>The conquest of Egypt rapidly followed that of Syria; and with the fall
+of Alexandria perished the largest library of the world, the thesaurus
+of all the intellectual treasures of antiquity.</p>
+
+<p>Then followed the conquest of Persia. A single battle, as in the time of
+Alexander, decided its fate. The marvel is that the people should have
+changed their religion; but then, it was Mohammedanism or death. And a
+still greater marvel it is,--an utter mystery to me,--why that Oriental
+country should have continued faithful to the new religion. It must have
+had some elements of vitality almost worth fighting for, and which we do
+not comprehend.</p>
+
+<p>Nor did Saracenic conquests end until the Arabs of the desert had
+penetrated southward into India farther than had Alexander the Great,
+and westward until they had subdued the northern kingdoms of Africa, and
+carried their arms to the Pillars of Hercules; yea, to the cities of the
+Goths in Spain, and were only finally arrested in Europe by the heroism
+of Charles Martel.</p>
+
+<p>Such were the rapid conquests of the Saracens--and permanent conquests
+also--in Asia and Africa, under the stimulus of religious fanaticism,
+until they had reduced thirty-six thousand cities, towns, and castles,
+and built fourteen thousand mosques.</p>
+
+<p>Now what are the deductions to be logically drawn from these stupendous
+victories and the consolidation of the various religions of the
+conquered into the creed of Mohammed,--not repudiated when the pressure
+was removed, but apparently cherished by one hundred and eighty millions
+of people for more than a thousand years?</p>
+
+<p>We must take the ground that the religion of Mohammed has marvellous and
+powerful truths, which we have overlooked and do not understand, which
+appeal to the heart and conscience, and excite a great enthusiasm,--so
+great as to stimulate successive generations with an almost unexampled
+ardor, and to defend which they were ready to die; a religion which has
+bound diverse nations together for nearly fourteen hundred years. If so,
+it cannot be abused, or ridiculed, or sneered at, any more than can the
+dominion of the popes in the Middle Ages, but remains august in
+impressive mystery to us, and even to future ages.</p>
+
+<p>But if, in comparison with Christianity, it is a corrupt and false
+religion, as many assume, then what deductions must we draw from its
+amazing triumphs? For the fact stares us in the face that it is rooted
+deeply in a large part of the Eastern world, or, at least, has prevailed
+victorious for more than a thousand years.</p>
+
+<p>First, we must conclude that the external triumph of a religion,
+especially among ignorant or wicked people, is not so much owing to the
+purity and loftiness of its truths, as to its harmony with prevailing
+errors and corruptions. When Mohammed preached his sublimest doctrines,
+and appealed to reason and conscience, he converted about a score of
+people in thirteen years. When he invoked demoralizing passions, he
+converted all Arabia in eleven years. And does not this startling
+conclusion seem to be confirmed by the whole history of mankind? How
+slow the progress of Christianity for two hundred years, except when
+assisted by direct supernatural influences! How rapid its triumphs when
+it became adapted to the rude barbaric mind, or to the degenerate people
+of the Empire! How popular and prevalent and widespread are those
+religions which we are accustomed to regard as most corrupt! Buddhism
+and Brahmanism have had more adherents than even Mohammedanism. How
+difficult it was for Moses and the prophets to keep the Jews from
+idolatry! What caused the rapid eclipse of faith in the antediluvian
+world? Why could not Noah establish and perpetuate his doctrines among
+his own descendants before he was dead? Why was the Socratic philosophy
+unpopular? Why were the Epicureans so fashionable? Why was Christianity
+itself most eagerly embraced when its light was obscured by fables and
+superstitions? Why did the Roman Empire perish, with all the aid of a
+magnificent civilization; why did this civilization itself retrograde;
+why did its art and literature decline? Why did the grand triumphs of
+Protestantism stop in half a century after Luther delivered his message?
+What made the mediaeval popes so powerful? What gave such ascendency to
+the Jesuits? Why is the simple faith of the primitive Christians so
+obnoxious to the wise, the mighty, and the noble? What makes the most
+insidious heresies so acceptable to the learned? Why is modern
+literature, when fashionable and popular, so antichristian in its tone
+and spirit? Why have not the doctrines of Luther held their own in
+Germany, and those of Calvin in Geneva, and those of Cranmer in England,
+and those of the Pilgrim Fathers in New England? Is it because, as men
+become advanced in learning and culture, they are theologically wiser
+than Moses and Abraham and Isaiah?</p>
+
+<p>I do not cite the rapid decline of modern civilized society, in a
+political or social view, in the most favored sections of Christendom; I
+do not sing dirges over republican institutions; I would not croak
+Jeremiads over the changes and developments of mankind. I simply speak
+of the marvellous similarity which the spread and triumph of
+Mohammedanism seem to bear to the spread and triumph of what is corrupt
+and wicked in all institutions and religions since the fall of man.
+Everywhere it is the frivolous, the corrupt, the false, which seem to be
+most prevalent and most popular. Do men love truth, or readily accept
+it, when it conflicts with passions and interests? Is any truth popular
+which is arrayed against the pride of reason? When has pure moral truth
+ever been fashionable? When have its advocates not been reviled,
+slandered, misrepresented, and persecuted, if it has interfered with the
+domination of prevailing interests? The lower the scale of pleasures the
+more eagerly are they sought by the great mass of the people, even in
+Christian communities. You can best make colleges thrive by turning them
+into schools of technology, with a view of advancing utilitarian and
+material interests. You cannot make a newspaper flourish unless
+you fill it with pictures and scandals, or make it a vehicle of
+advertisements,--which are not frivolous or corrupt, it is true, but
+which have to do with merely material interests. Your libraries would
+never be visited, if you took away their trash. Your Sabbath-school
+books would not be read, unless you made them an insult to the human
+understanding. Your salons would be deserted, if you entertained your
+guests with instructive conversation. There would be no fashionable
+gatherings, if it were not to display dresses and diamonds. Your pulpits
+would be unoccupied, if you sought the profoundest men to fill them.</p>
+
+<p>Everything, even in Christian communities, shows that vanities and
+follies and falsehoods are the most sought, and that nothing is more
+discouraging than appeals to high intelligence or virtue, even in art.
+This is the uniform history of the race, everywhere and in all ages. Is
+it darkness or light which the world loves? I never read, and I never
+heard, of a great man with a great message to deliver, who would not
+have sunk under disappointment or chagrin but for his faith. Everywhere
+do you see the fascination of error, so that it almost seems to be as
+vital as truth itself. When and where have not lies and sophistries and
+hypocrisies reigned? I appeal to history. I appeal to the observation
+and experience of every thoughtful and candid mind. You cannot get
+around this truth. It blazes and it burns like the fires of Sinai. Men
+left to themselves will more and more retrograde in virtue.</p>
+
+<p>What, then, is the hope of the world? We are driven to this
+deduction,--that if truth in itself is not all-conquering, the divine
+assistance, given at times to truth itself, as in the early Church, is
+the only reason why truth conquers. This divine grace, promised in the
+Bible, has wrought wonders whenever it has pleased the Almighty to
+bestow it, and only then. History teaches this as impressively as
+revelation. Christianity itself, unaided, would probably die out in this
+world. And hence the grand conclusion is, that it is the mysterious, or,
+as some call it, the supernatural, spirit of Almighty power which is,
+after all, the highest hope of this world. This is not discrepant with
+the oldest traditions and theogonies of the East,--the hidden wisdom of
+ancient Indian and Persian and Egyptian sages, concealed from the
+vulgar, but really embraced by the profoundest men, before corruptions
+perverted even their wisdom. This certainly is the earliest revelation
+of the Bible. This is the power which Moses recognized, and all the
+prophets who succeeded him. This is the power which even Mohammed, in
+the loftiness of his contemplations, more dimly saw, and imperfectly
+taught to the idolaters around him, and which gives to his system all
+that was really valuable. Ask not when and where this power shall be
+most truly felt. It is around us, and above us, and beneath us. It is
+the mystery and grandeur of the ages. &quot;It is not by might nor by power,
+but by my spirit,&quot; saith the Lord. Man is nothing, his aspirations are
+nothing, the universe itself is nothing, without the living, permeating
+force which comes from this supernal Deity we adore, to interfere and
+save. Without His special agency, giving to His truths vitality, this
+world would soon become a hopeless and perpetual pandemonium. Take away
+the necessity of this divine assistance as the one great condition of
+all progress, as well as the highest boon which mortals seek,--then
+prayer itself, recognized even by Mohammedans as the loftiest
+aspiration and expression of a dependent soul, and regarded by prophets
+and apostles and martyrs as their noblest privilege, becomes a
+superstition, a puerility, a mockery, and a hopeless dream.</p>
+
+<p>AUTHORITIES.</p>
+
+<p>The Koran; Dean Prideaux's Life of Mohammed; Vie de Mahomet, by the
+Comte de Boulainvilliers; Gagnier's Life of Mohammed; Ockley's History
+of the Saracens; Gibbon, fiftieth chapter; Hallam's Middle Ages;
+Milman's Latin Christianity; Dr. Weil's Mohammed der Prophet, sein Leben
+und seine Lehre; Renan, Revue des Deux Mondes, 1851; Bustner's
+Pilgrimage to El Medina and Mecca; Life of Mahomet, by Washington
+Irving; Essai sur l'Histoire des Arabes, par A.P. Caussin de Perceval;
+Carlyle's Lectures on Heroes and Hero Worship; E.A. Freeman's Lectures
+on the History of the Saracens; Forster's Mahometanism Unveiled; Maurice
+on the Religions of the World; Life and Religion of Mohammed, translated
+from the Persian, by Rev. I.L. Merrick.</p>
+
+
+<br><br><hr style="width: 35%;"><br><br>
+<h2><a name="CHARLEMAGNE."></a>CHARLEMAGNE.</h2>
+
+<hr style="width: 25%;">
+
+<p>A.D. 742-814.</p>
+
+<p>REVIVAL OF WESTERN EMPIRE.</p>
+
+<p>The most illustrious monarch of the Middle Ages was doubtless
+Charlemagne. Certainly he was the first great statesman, hero, and
+organizer that looms up to view after the dissolution of the Roman
+Empire. Therefore I present him as one with whom is associated an epoch
+in civilization. To him we date the first memorable step which Europe
+took out of the anarchies of the Merovingian age. His dream was to
+revive the Empire that had fallen. He was the first to labor, with giant
+strength, to restore what vice and violence had destroyed. He did not
+succeed in realizing the great ends to which he aspired, but his
+aspirations were lofty. It was not in the power of any man to civilize
+semi-barbarians in a single reign; but if he attempted impossibilities
+he did not live in vain, since he bequeathed some permanent conquests
+and some great traditions. He left a great legacy to civilization. His
+life has not dramatic interest like that of Hildebrand, nor poetic
+interest like the lives of the leaders of the Crusades; but it is very
+instructive. He was the pride of his own generation, and the boast of
+succeeding ages, &quot;claimed,&quot; says Sismondi, &quot;by the Church as a saint, by
+the French as the greatest of their kings, by the Germans as their
+countryman, and by the Italians as their emperor.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>His remote ancestors, it is said, were ecclesiastical magnates. His
+grandfather was Charles Martel, who gained such signal victories over
+the Mohammedan Saracens; his father was Pepin, who was a renowned
+conqueror, and who subdued the southern part of France, or Gaul. He did
+not rise, like Clovis, from the condition of a chieftain of a tribe of
+barbarians; nor, like the founder of his family, from a mayor of the
+palace, or minister of the Merovingian kings. His early life was spent
+amid the turmoils and dangers of camps, and as a young man he was
+distinguished for precocity of talent, manly beauty, and gigantic
+physical strength. He was a type of chivalry, before chivalry arose. He
+was born to greatness, and early succeeded to a great inheritance. At
+the age of twenty-six, in the year 768, he became the monarch of the
+greater part of modern France, and of those provinces which border on
+the Rhine. By unwearied activities this inheritance, greater than that
+of any of the Merovingian kings, was not only kept together and
+preserved, but was increased by successive conquests, until no so great
+an empire has ever been ruled by any one man in Europe, since the fall
+of the Roman Empire, from his day to ours. Yet greater than the
+conquests of Charlemagne was the greatness of his character. He
+preserved simplicity and gentleness amid all the distractions attending
+his government.</p>
+
+<p>His reign affords a striking contrast to that of all his predecessors of
+the Merovingian dynasty,--which reigned from the immediate destruction
+of the Roman Empire. The Merovingian princes, with the exception of
+Clovis and a few others, were mere barbarians, although converted to a
+nominal Christianity. Some of them were monsters, and others were
+idiots. Clotaire burned to death his own son and wife and daughters.
+Fr&eacute;degunde armed her assassins with poisoned daggers. &quot;Thirteen
+sovereigns reigned over the Franks in one hundred and fourteen years,
+only two of whom attained to man's estate, and not one to the full
+development of intellectual powers. There was scarcely one who did not
+live in a state of perpetual intoxication, or who did not rival
+Sardanapalus in effeminacy, and Commodus in cruelty.&quot; As these
+sovereigns were ruled by priests, their iniquities were glossed over by
+Gregory of Tours. In <i>his</i> annals they may pass for saints, but history
+consigns them to an infamous immortality.</p>
+
+<p>It is difficult to conceive a more dreary and dismal state of society
+than existed in France, and in fact over all Europe, when Charlemagne
+began to reign. The Roman Empire was in ruins, except in the East, where
+the Greek emperors reigned at Constantinople. The western provinces were
+ruled by independent barbaric kings. There was no central authority,
+although there was an attempt of the popes to revive it,--a spiritual
+rather than a temporal power; a theocracy whose foundation had been laid
+by Leo the Great when he established the <i>jus divinum</i> principle,--that
+he was the successor of Peter, to whom were given the keys of heaven and
+hell. If there was an interesting feature in the times it was this
+spiritual authority exercised by the bishops of Rome: the most useful
+and beneficent considering the evils which prevailed,--the reign of
+brute force. The barbaric chieftains yielded a partial homage to this
+spiritual power, and it was some check on their rapacity of violence. It
+is mournful to think that so little of the ancient civilization remained
+in the eighth century. Its eclipse was total. The shadows of a dark and
+long night of superstition and ignorance spread over Europe. Law was
+silenced by the sword. Justinian's glorious legacy was already
+forgotten. The old mechanism which had kept society together in the
+fifth century was worn out, broken, rejected. There was no literature,
+no philosophy, no poetry, no history, and no art. Even the clergy had
+become ignorant, superstitious, and idle. Forms had taken the place
+of faith. No great theologians had arisen since Saint Augustine. The
+piety of the age hid itself in monasteries; and these monasteries were
+as funereal as society itself. Men despaired of the world, and retreated
+from it to sing mournful songs. The architecture of the age expressed
+the sentiments of the age, and was heavy, gloomy, and monotonous. &quot;The
+barbarians ruthlessly marched over the ruins of cities and palaces,
+having no regard for the treasures of the classic world, and unmoved by
+the lessons of its past experience.&quot; Rome itself, repeatedly sacked, was
+a heap of ruins. No reconstruction had taken place. Gardens and villas
+were as desolate as the ruined palaces, which were the abodes of owls
+and spiders. The immortal creations of the chisel were used to prop up
+old crumbling walls. The costly monuments of senatorial pride were
+broken to pieces in sport or in caprice, and those structures which had
+excited the admiration of ages were pulled down that their material
+might be used in erecting tasteless edifices. Literature shared the
+general desolation. The valued manuscripts of classical ages were
+mutilated, erased, or burned. The monks finished the destruction which
+the barbarians began. Ignorance as well as anarchy veiled Europe in
+darkness. The rust of barbarism became harder and thicker. The last hope
+of man had fled, and glory was succeeded by shame. Even slavery, the
+curse of the Roman Empire, was continued by the barbarians; only, brute
+force was not made subservient to intellect, but intellect to brute
+force. The descendants of ancient patrician families were in bondage to
+barbarians. The age was the jubilee of monsters. Assassination was
+common, and was unavenged by law. Every man was his own avenger of
+crime, and his bloody weapons were his only law.</p>
+
+<p>Nor were there seen among the barbaric chieftains the virtues of ancient
+Pagan Rome and Greece, for Christianity was nominal. War was universal;
+for the barbarians, having no longer the Romans to fight, fought among
+themselves. There were incessant irruptions of different tribes passing
+from one country to another, in search of plunder and pillage. There was
+no security of life or property, and therefore no ambition for
+acquisition. Men hid themselves in morasses, in forests, on the tops of
+inaccessible hills, and amid the recesses of valleys, for violence was
+the rule and not the exception. Even feudalism was not then born, and
+still less chivalry. We find no elevated sentiments. The only refuge for
+the miserable was in the Church, and the Church was governed by narrow
+and ignorant priests. A cry of despair went up to heaven among the
+descendants of the old population. There was no commerce, no travel, no
+industries, no money, no peace. The chastisement of Almighty Power seems
+to have been sent on the old races and the new alike. It was a
+desolation greater than that predicted by Jeremy the prophet. The very
+end of the world seemed to be at hand. Never in the old seats of
+civilization was there such a disintegration; never such a combination
+of evils and miseries. And there appeared to be no remedy: nothing but a
+long night of horrors and sufferings could be predicted. Gaul, or
+France, was the scene of turbulence, invasions, and anarchies; of
+murders, of conflagrations, and of pillage by rival chieftains, who
+sought to divide its territories among themselves. The people were
+utterly trodden down. England was the battle-field of Danes, Saxons, and
+Celts, invaded perpetually, and split up into petty Saxon kingdoms. The
+roads were infested with robbers, and agriculture was rude. The people
+lived in cabins, dressed themselves in skins, and fed on the coarsest
+food. Spain was invaded by Saracens, and the Gothic kingdoms succumbed
+to these fierce invaders. Italy was portioned out among different
+tribes, Gothic and Slavonic. But the prevailing races in Europe were
+Germanic (who had conquered both the Celts and the Romans), the Goths in
+Spain, the Franks and Burgundians in France, the Lombards in Italy, the
+Saxons in England.</p>
+
+<p>What a commentary on the imperial government of the Caesars!--that
+government which, with all its mechanisms and traditions, lasted
+scarcely four hundred years. Was there ever, in the whole history of
+the world, so sudden and mournful a change from civilization to
+barbarism,--and this in spite of art, science, law, and Christianity
+itself? Were there no conservative forces in that imposing Empire? Why
+did society constantly decline for four hundred years, with that
+civilization which was its boast and hope? Oh, ye optimists, who talk so
+glibly about the natural and necessary progress of humanity, why was the
+Roman Empire swept away, with all its material glories, to give place to
+such a state of society as I have just briefly described?</p>
+
+<p>And yet men should arise in due time, after the punishment of five
+centuries of crime and violence, wretchedness and despair, to
+reconstruct, not from the old Pagan materials of Greece and Rome, but
+with the fresh energies of new races, aided and inspired by the truths
+of the everlasting gospel. The infancy of the new races, sprung however
+from the same old Aryan stock, passed into vigorous youth when
+Charlemagne appeared. From him we date the first decided impulse given
+to the Gothic civilization. He was the morning star of European hopes
+and aspirations.</p>
+
+<p>Let us now turn to his glorious deeds. What were the services he
+rendered to Europe and Christian civilization?</p>
+
+<p>It was necessary that a truly great man should arise in the eighth
+century, if the new forces of civilization were to be organized. To show
+what he did for the new races, and how he did it, is the historian's
+duty and task in describing the reign of Charlemagne,--sent, I think, as
+Moses was, for a providential mission, in the fulness of time, after the
+slaveries of three hundred years, which prepared the people for labor
+and industry. Better was it that they should till the lands of allodial
+proprietors in misery and sorrow, attacked and pillaged, than to wander
+like savages in forests and morasses in quest of a precarious support,
+or in great predatory bands, as they did in the fourth and fifth
+centuries, when they ravaged the provinces of the falling Empire.
+Nothing was wanted but their consolidation under central rule in order
+to repel aggressors. And that is what Charlemagne attempted to do.</p>
+
+<p>He soon perceived the greatness of the struggle to which he was
+destined, and he did not flinch from the contest which has given him
+immortality. He comprehended the difficulties which surrounded him and
+the dangers which menaced him.</p>
+
+<p>The great perils which threatened Europe were from unsubdued barbarians,
+who sought to replunge it into the miseries which the great irruptions
+had inflicted three hundred years before. He therefore bent all the
+energies of his mind and all the resources of his kingdom to arrest
+these fresh waves of inundation. And so long was his contest with
+Saxons, Avares, Lombards, and other tribes and races that he is chiefly
+to be contemplated as a man who struggled against barbarism. And he
+fought them, not for excitement, not for the love of fighting, not for
+useless conquests, not for military fame, not for aggrandizement, but
+because a stern necessity was laid upon him to protect his own
+territories and the institutions he wished to conserve.</p>
+
+<p>Of these barbarians there was one nation peculiarly warlike and
+ferocious, and which cherished an inextinguishable hatred not merely of
+the Franks, but of civilization itself. They were obstinately attached
+to their old superstitions, and had a great repugnance to Christianity.
+They were barbarians, like the old North American Indians, because they
+determined to be so; because they loved their forests and the chase,
+indulged in amusements which were uncertain and dangerous, and sought
+for nothing beyond their immediate inclinations. They had no territorial
+divisions, and abhorred cities as prisons of despotism. But, like all
+the Germanic barbarians, they had interesting traits. They respected
+women; they were brave and daring; they had a dogged perseverance, and a
+noble passion for personal independence. But they were nevertheless the
+enemies of civilization, of a regular and industrious life, and sought
+plunder and revenge. The Franks and Goths were once like them, before
+the time of Clovis; but they had made settlements, they tilled the land,
+and built villages and cities: they were partially civilized, and were
+converted to Christianity. But these new barbarians could not be won by
+arts or the ministers of religion. These people were the Saxons, and
+inhabited those parts of Germany which were bounded by the Rhine, the
+Oder, the North Sea, and the Thuringian forests. They were fond of the
+sea, and of daring expeditions for plunder. They were a kindred race to
+those Saxons who had conquered England, and had the same elements of
+character. They were poor, and sought to live by piracy and robbery.
+They were very dangerous enemies, but if brought under subjection to
+law, and converted to Christianity, might be turned into useful allies,
+for they had the materials of a noble race.</p>
+
+<p>With such a people on his borders, and every day becoming more
+formidable, what was Charlemagne's policy? What was he to do? The only
+thing to the eye of that enlightened statesman was to conquer them, if
+possible, and add their territories to the Frankish Empire. If left to
+themselves, they might have conquered the Franks. It was either anvil or
+hammer. There could be no lasting peace in Europe while these barbarians
+were left to pursue their depredations. A vigorous warfare was
+imperative, for, unless subdued, a disadvantageous war would be carried
+on near the frontiers, until some warrior would arise among them, unite
+the various chieftains, and lead his followers to successful invasion.
+Charlemagne knew that the difficult and unpleasant work of subjugation
+must be done by somebody, and he was unwilling to leave the work to
+enervated successors. The work was not child's play. It took him the
+best part of his life to accomplish it, and amid great discouragements.
+Of his fifty-three expeditions, eighteen were against the Saxons. As
+soon as he had cut off one head of the monster, another head appeared.
+How allegorical of human labor is that old fable of the Hydra! Where do
+man's labors cease? Charlemagne fought not only amid great difficulties,
+but perpetual irritations. The Saxons cheated him; they broke their
+promises and their oaths. When beaten, they sued for peace; but the
+moment his back was turned, they broke out in new insurrections. The
+fame of Caesar chiefly rests on his eight campaigns in Gaul. But Caesar
+had the disciplined Legions of Rome to fight with. Charlemagne had no
+such disciplined troops. Yet he had as many difficulties to surmount as
+Caesar,--rugged forests to penetrate, rapid rivers to cross, morasses to
+avoid, and mountains to climb. It is a very difficult thing to subdue
+even savages who are desperate, determined, and united.</p>
+
+<p>Charlemagne fought the Saxons for thirty-three years. Though he never
+lost a battle, they still held out. At first he was generous and
+forgiving, for he was more magnanimous than Caesar; but they could not
+be won by kindness. He was obliged to change his course, and at last was
+as summary as Oliver Cromwell in Ireland. He is even accused of
+cruelties. But war in the hands of masters has no quarter to give, and
+no tears to shed. It was necessary to conquer the Saxons, and
+Charlemagne used the requisite means. Sometimes the harshest measures
+will most speedily effect the end. Did our fathers ever dream of
+compromise with treacherous and hostile Indians? War has a horrid
+maxim,--that &quot;nothing is so successful as success.&quot; Charlemagne, at
+last, was successful. The Saxons were so completely subdued at the end
+of thirty-three years, that they never molested civilized Europe again.
+They became civilized, like the once invading Celts and Goths; and they
+even embraced the religion of the conquerors. They became ultimately the
+best people in Europe,--earnest, honest, and brave. They formed great
+kingdoms and states, and became new barriers against fresh inundations
+from the North and East. The Saxons formed the nucleus of the great
+German Empire (or were incorporated with it) which arose in the Middle
+Ages, and which to-day is the most powerful in Europe, and the least
+corrupted by the vices of a luxurious life. The descendants of those
+Saxons are among the most industrious and useful settlers in the
+New World.</p>
+
+<p>There was one mistake which Charlemagne made in reference to them. He
+forced their conversion to a nominal Christianity. He immersed them in
+the rivers of Saxony, whether they would or no. He would make them
+Christians in his way. But then, who does not seek to make converts in
+his way, whether enlightened or not? When have the principles of
+religious toleration been understood? Did the Puritans understand them,
+with all their professions? Do we tolerate, in our hearts, those who
+differ from us? Do not men look daggers, though they dare not use them?
+If we had the power, would we not seek to produce conformity with our
+notions, like Queen Elizabeth, or Oliver Cromwell, or Archbishop Laud?
+There is not perhaps a village in America where a true catholicism
+reigns. There is not a spot upon the globe where there is not some form
+of religious persecution. Nor is there anything more sincere than
+religious bigotry. And when people have not fundamental principles to
+fight about, they will fight about technicalities and matters of no
+account, and all the more bitterly sometimes when the objects of
+contention are not worth fighting about at all,--as in forms of worship,
+or baptism. Such is the weakness of human nature. Charlemagne was no
+exception to the race. But if he wished to make Christians in his way,
+he was, on the whole, enlightened. He caused the young Saxons, whom he
+baptized and marked with the sign of the Cross, to be educated. He built
+monasteries and churches in the conquered territories. He recognized
+this,--that Christianity, whatever it be, is the mightiest power of the
+world; and he bore his testimony in behalf of the intellectual dignity
+of the clergy in comparison with other classes. He encouraged missions
+as well as schools.</p>
+
+<p>There was another Germanic tribe at that time which he held in great
+alarm, but which he did not attack, since they were not immediately
+dangerous. This tribe or race was the Norman, just then beginning their
+ravages,--pirates in open boats. They had dared to enter a port in
+Narbonensis Gaul for purposes of plunder. Some took them for Africans,
+and others for British merchants. Nay, said Charlemagne, they are not
+merchants, but cruel enemies; and he covered his face with his iron
+hands and wept like a child. He did not fear these barbarians, but he
+wept when he foresaw the evil they would do when he was dead. &quot;I weep,&quot;
+said he, &quot;that they should dare almost to land on my shores, in my
+lifetime.&quot; These Normans escaped him. They conquered and they founded
+kingdoms. But they did not replunge Europe in darkness. A barrier had
+been made against their inundation. The Saxon conquest was that
+barrier. Moreover, the Normans were the noblest race of barbarians which
+then roamed through the forests of Germany, or skirted the shores of
+Scandinavia. They had grand natural traits of character. They were
+poetic, brave, and adventurous. They were superior to the Saxons and the
+Franks. When converted, they were the great allies of the Pope, and
+early became civilized. To them we trace the noblest development of
+Gothic architecture. They became great scholars and statesmen. They were
+more refined by nature than the Saxons, and avoided their gluttonous
+habits. In after times they composed the flower of European chivalry. It
+was providential that they were not subdued,--that they became the
+leading race in Northern Europe. To them we trace the mercantile
+greatness of England, for they were born sailors. They never lost their
+natural heroism, or love of power.</p>
+
+<p>The next important conquest of Charlemagne was that of the Avares,--a
+tribe of the Huns, of Slavonic origin. They are represented as very
+hideous barbarians, and only thought of plunder. They never sought to
+reconstruct. There seemed to be no end of their invasions from the time
+of Attila. They were more formidable for their numbers and destructive
+ravages than for their military skill. There was a time, however, when
+they threatened the combined forces of Germany and Rome; but Europe was
+delivered by the battle of Poictiers,--the bloodiest battle on
+record,--when they seemed to be annihilated. But they sprang up again,
+in new invasions, in the ninth century. Had they conquered, civilization
+would have been crushed out. But Charlemagne was successful against
+them, and from that time to this they were shut out from western Europe.
+They would be formidable now, for the Russians are the descendants of
+these people, were it not for the barrier raised against them by the
+Germans. The necessities of Europe still require the vast military
+strength and organization of Germany, not to fight France, but to awe
+Russia. Napoleon predicted that Europe would become either French or
+Cossack; but there is little probability of Russian aggressions in
+Europe, so long as Russia is held in check by Germany.</p>
+
+<p>Charlemagne had now delivered France and Germany from external enemies.
+He then turned his arms against the Saracens of Spain. This was the
+great mistake of his life. Yet every one makes mistakes, however great
+his genius. Alexander made the mistake of pushing his arms into India;
+and Napoleon made a great blunder in invading Russia. Even Caesar died
+at the right time for his military fame, for he was on the point of
+attempting the conquest of Parthia, where, like Crassus, he would
+probably have perished, or have lost his army. Needless conquests seem
+to be impossible in the moral government of God, who rules the fate of
+war. Conquests are only possible when civilization seems to require
+them. In seeking to invade Spain, Charlemagne warred against a race from
+whom Europe had nothing more to fear. His grandfather, Charles Martel,
+had arrested the conquests of the Saracens; and they were quiet in their
+settlements in Spain, and had made considerable attainments in science
+and literature. Their schools of medicine and their arts were in advance
+of the rest of Europe. They were the translators of Aristotle, who
+reigned in the rising universities during the Middle Ages. As this war
+was unnecessary, Providence seemed to rebuke Charlemagne. His defeat at
+Roncesvalles was one of the most memorable events in his military
+history. Prodigies of valor were wrought by him and his gallant
+Paladins. The early heroic poetry of the Middle Ages has commemorated
+his exploits, as well as those of his nephew Roland, to whom some
+writers have ascribed the origin of Chivalry. But the Frankish forces
+were signally defeated amid the passes of the Pyrenees; and it was not
+until after several centuries that the Gothic princes of Spain shook off
+the yoke of their Saracenic conquerors, and drove them from Europe.</p>
+
+<p>The Lombard wars of Charlemagne are the last to which I allude. These
+were undertaken in defence of the Church, to rescue his ally the Pope.
+The Lombards belonged to the great Germanic family, but they were
+unfriendly to the Pope and to the Church. They stood out against the
+Empire, which was then the chief hope of Europe and of civilization.
+They would have reduced the Pope to insignificance and seized his
+territories, without uniting Italy. So Charlemagne, like his father
+Pepin, lent his powerful aid to the Roman bishop, and the Lombards were
+easily subdued. This conquest, although the easiest which he ever made,
+most flattered his pride. Lombardy was not only joined to his Empire,
+but he received unparalleled honors from the Pope, being crowned by him
+Emperor of the West.</p>
+
+<p>It was a proud day when, in the ancient metropolis of the world, and in
+the fulness of his fame, Pope Leo III. placed the crown of Augustus upon
+Charlemagne's brow, and gave to him, amid the festivities of Christmas,
+his apostolic benediction. His dominions now extended from Catalonia to
+the Bohemian forests, embracing Germany, France, the Netherlands, Italy,
+and the Spanish main,--the largest empire which any one man has
+possessed since the fall of the Roman Empire. What more natural than for
+Charlemagne to feel that he had restored the Western Empire? What more
+natural than that he should have taken the title, still claimed by the
+Austrian emperor, in one sense his legitimate successor,--Kaiser, or
+Caesar? In the possession of such enormous power, he naturally dreamed
+of establishing a new universal military monarchy like that of the
+Romans,--as Charles V. dreamed, and Napoleon after him. But this is a
+dream that Providence has rebuked among all successive conquerors. There
+may have been need of the universal monarchy of the Caesars, that
+Christianity might spread in peace, and be protected by a reign of law
+and order. This at least is one of the platitudes of historians. Froude
+himself harps on it in his life of Caesar. Historians are fond of
+exalting the glories of imperialism, and everybody is dazzled by the
+splendor and power of ancient Roman emperors. They do not, I think,
+sufficiently consider the blasting influence of imperialism on the life
+of nations,--how it dries up the sources of renovation, how it
+necessarily withers literature and philosophy, how nothing can thrive
+under it but pomp and material glories, how it paralyzes all virtuous
+impulses, how it kills all enthusiasm, how it crushes out all hope and
+lofty aspirations, how it makes slaves of its best subjects, how it
+fills the earth with fear, how it drains national resources to support
+standing armies, how it mocks all enterprises which do not receive
+imperial approbation, how everything is concentrated to reflect the
+glory of one man or family; how impossible, under its withering shade,
+is manly independence, or the free expression of opinions or healthy
+growth; how it buries up, under its armies, discontents and aspirations
+alike, and creates nothing but machinery which must ultimately wear out
+and leave a world in ruins, with nothing stable to take its place. Law
+and order are good things, the preservation of property is desirable,
+the punishment of crime is necessary; but there are other things which
+are valuable also. Nothing is so valuable as the preservation of
+national life; nothing is so healthy as scope for energies; nothing is
+so contemptible and degrading as universal sycophancy to official rule.
+There are no tyrants more oppressive than the tools of absolute power.
+See in what a state imperialism left the Roman Empire when it fell.
+There were no rallying forces; there was no resurrection of heroes.
+Vitality had fled. Where would Turkey be to-day without the European
+powers, if the Sultan's authority were to fall? It would be in the state
+of ancient Babylon or Persia when those empires fell.</p>
+
+<p>There is another side to imperialism besides dreaded anarchies.
+Moreover, the whole progress of civilization has been counter to it. The
+fiats of eternal justice have pronounced against it, because it is
+antagonistic to the dignity of man and the triumphs of reason. I would
+not fall in with the cant of the dignity of man, because there is no
+dignity to man without aid from God Almighty through His spirit and the
+message he has sent in Christianity. But there is dignity in man with
+the aid of a regenerating gospel. Some people talk of the triumphs of
+Christianity under the Roman emperors; but see how rapidly it was
+corrupted by them when they sought the aid of its institutions to
+bolster up their power. The power of Christianity is in its truths; in
+its religion, and not in its forms and institutions, in its inventions
+to uphold the arms of despotism and the tools of despotism. It is, and
+it was, and it will be through all the ages the great power of the
+world, against which it is vain to rebel. And that government is really
+the best which unfetters its spiritual influence, and encourages it; and
+not that government which seeks to perpetuate its corrupt and worldly
+institutions. The Roman emperors made Christianity an institution, and
+obscured its truths. And perhaps that is one reason why Providence
+permitted their despotism to pass away,--preferring the rude anarchy of
+the Germanic nations to the dead mechanism of a lifeless Church and
+imperial rottenness. Imperialism must ever end in rottenness. And that
+is one reason why the heart of Christendom--I mean the people of Europe,
+in its enlightened and virtuous sections--has ever opposed imperialism.
+The progress has been slow, but marked, towards representative
+governments,--not the reign of the people directly, but of those whom
+they select to represent them. The victory has been nearly gained in
+England. In France the progress has been uniform since the Revolution.
+Napoleon revived, or sought to revive, the imperialism of Rome. He
+failed. There is nothing which the French now so cordially detest, since
+their eyes have been opened to the character and ends of that usurper,
+as his imperialism. It cannot be revived any more easily than the
+oracles of Dodona. Even in Germany there are dreadful discontents in
+view of the imperialism which Bismarck, by the force of successful wars,
+has seemingly revived. The awful standing armies are a menace to all
+liberty and progress and national development. In Italy itself there is
+the commencement of constitutional authority, although it is united
+under a king. The great standing warfare of modern times is
+constitutional authority against the absolute power of kings and
+emperors. And the progress has been on the side of liberty everywhere,
+with occasional drawbacks, such as when Louis Napoleon revived the
+accursed despotism of his uncle, and by the same means,--a standing army
+and promises of military glory.</p>
+
+<p>Hence, in the order of Providence, the dream of Charlemagne as to
+unbounded military aggrandizement could not be realized. He could not
+revive the imperialism of Rome or Persia. No man will ever arise in
+Europe who can re-establish it, except for a brief period. It will be
+rebuked by the superintending Power, because it is fatal to the highest
+development of nations, because all its glories are delusory, because it
+sows the seeds of ruin. It produces that very egotism, materialism, and
+sensuality, that inglorious rest and pleasure, which, as everybody
+concedes, prepared the way for violence.</p>
+
+<p>And hence Charlemagne's empire went to pieces as soon as he was dead.
+There was nothing permanent in his conquests, except those made against
+barbarism. He was raised up to erect barriers against fresh inroads of
+barbarians. His whole empire was finally split up into petty
+sovereignties. In one sense he founded States, &quot;since he founded the
+States which sprang up from the dismemberment of his empire. The
+kingdoms of Germany, Italy, France, Burgundy, Lorraine, Navarre, all
+date to his memorable reign.&quot; But these mediaeval kingdoms were feudal;
+the power of the kings was nominal. Government passed from imperialism
+into the hands of nobles. The government of Europe in the Middle Ages
+was a military aristocracy, only powerful as the interests of the people
+were considered. Kings and princes did not make much show, except in the
+trappings of royalty,--in gorgeous dresses of purple and gold, to suit a
+barbaric taste,--in the insignia of power without its reality. The power
+was among the aristocracy, who, it must be confessed, ground down the
+people by a hard feudal rule, but who did not grind the souls out of
+them, like the imperialism of absolute monarchies, with their standing
+armies. Under them the feudal nobles of Europe at length recuperated.
+Virtues were born everywhere,--in England, in France, in Germany, in
+Holland,--which were a savor of life unto life: loyalty, self-respect,
+fidelity to covenants, chivalry, sympathy with human misery, love of
+home, rural sports, a glorious rural life, which gave stamina to
+character,--a material which Christianity could work upon, and kindle
+the latent fires of freedom, and the impulses of a generous enthusiasm.
+It was under the fostering influences of small, independent chieftains
+that manly strength and organized social institutions arose once
+more,--the reserved power of unconquerable nations. Nobody hates
+feudalism--in its corruptions, in its oppressions--more than I do. But
+it was the transition stage from the anarchy which the collapse of
+imperialism produced to the constitutional governments of our times, if
+we could forget the absolute monarchies which flourished on the breaking
+up of feudalism, when it became a tyranny and a mockery, but which
+absolute monarchies flourished only one or two hundred years,--a sort of
+necessity in the development of nations to check the insolence and
+overgrown power of nobles, but after all essentially different from the
+imperialism of Caesar or Napoleon, since they relied on the support of
+nobles and municipalities more than on a standing army; yea, on votes
+and grants from parliaments to raise money to support the
+army,--certainly in England, as in the time of Elizabeth. The Bourbons,
+indeed, reigned without grants from the people or the nobility, and what
+was the logical result?--a French Revolution! Would a French Revolution
+have been possible under the Roman Caesars?</p>
+
+<p>But I will not pursue this gradual development of constitutional
+government from the anarchies which arose out of the fall of the Roman
+Empire,--just the reverse of what happened in the history of Rome; I say
+no more of the imperialism which Charlemagne sought to restore, but was
+not permitted by Providence, and which, after all, was the dream of his
+latter days, when, like Napoleon, he was intoxicated by power and
+brilliant conquests; and I turn to consider briefly his direct effects
+in civilization, which showed his great and enlightened mind, and on
+which his fame in no small degree rests.</p>
+
+<p>Charlemagne was no insignificant legislator. His Capitularies may not be
+equal to the laws of Justinian in natural justice, but were adapted to
+his times and circumstances. He collected the scattered codes, so far as
+laws were codified, of the various Germanic nations, and modified them.
+He introduced a great Christian element into his jurisprudence. He made
+use of the canons of the Church. His code is more ecclesiastical than
+that of Theodosius even, the last great Christian emperor. But in his
+day the clergy wielded great power, and their ordinances and decisions
+were directed to society as it was. The clergy were the great jurists of
+their day. The spiritual courts decided matters of great importance, and
+took cognizance of cases which were out of the jurisdiction of temporal
+courts. Charlemagne recognized the value of these spiritual courts, and
+aided them. He had no quarrels with ecclesiastics, nor was he jealous of
+their power. He allied himself with it. He was a friend of the clergy.
+One of the peculiarities of all the Germanic laws, seen especially in
+those of Ina and Alfred, was pecuniary compensation for crime: fifty
+shillings, in England, would pay for the loss of a foot, and twenty for
+a nose and four for a tooth; thus recognizing a principle seen in our
+times in railroad accidents, though not recognized in our civil laws in
+reference to crimes. This system of compensation Charlemagne retained,
+which perhaps answered for his day.</p>
+
+<p>He was also a great administrator. Nothing escaped his vigilance. I do
+not read that he made many roads, or effected important internal
+improvements. The age was too barbarous for the development of national
+industries,--one of the main things which occupy modern statesmen and
+governments. But whatever he did was wise and enlightened. He rewarded
+merit; he made an alliance with learned men; he sought out the right men
+for important posts; he made the learned Alcuin his teacher and
+counsellor; he established libraries and schools; he built convents and
+monasteries; he gave encouragement to men of great attainments; he loved
+to surround himself with learned men; the scholars of all countries
+sought his protection and patronage, and found him a friend. Alcuin
+became one of the richest men in his dominions, and Englebert received
+one of his daughters in marriage. Napoleon professed a great admiration
+for Charlemagne, although Frederic II. was his model sovereign. But how
+differently Napoleon acted in this respect! Napoleon was jealous of
+literary genius. He hated literary men. He rarely invited them to his
+table, and was constrained in their presence. He drove them out of the
+kingdom even. He wanted nothing but homage,--and literary genius has no
+sympathy with brute force, or machinery, or military exploits. But
+Charlemagne, like Peter the Great, delighted in the society of all who
+could teach him anything. He was a tolerably learned man himself,
+considering his life of activity. He spoke Latin as fluently as his
+native German, and it is said that he understood Greek. He liked to
+visit schools, and witness the performances of the boys; and, provided
+they made proficiency in their studies, he cared little for their noble
+birth. He was no respecter of persons. With wrath he reproved the idle.
+He promised rewards to merit and industry.</p>
+
+<p>The most marked feature of his reign, outside his wars, was his sympathy
+with the clergy. Here, too, he differed from Napoleon and Frederic II.
+Mr. Hallam considers his alliance with the Church the great error of his
+reign; but I believe it built up his throne. In his time the clergy were
+the most influential people of the Empire and the most enlightened; but
+at that time the great contest of the Middle Ages between spiritual and
+temporal authority had not begun. Ambrose, indeed, had rebuked
+Theodosius, and set in defiance the empress when she interfered with his
+spiritual functions; and Leo had laid the corner-stone of the Papacy by
+instituting a divine right to his decrees. But a Hildebrand and a Becket
+had not arisen to usurp the prerogatives of their monarchs. Least of all
+did popes then dream of subjecting the temporal powers and raising the
+spiritual over them, so as to lead to issues with kings. That was a
+later development in the history of the papacy. The popes of the eighth
+and ninth centuries sought to heal disorder, to punish turbulent
+chieftains, to sustain law and order, to establish a tribunal of justice
+to which the discontented might appeal. They sought to conserve the
+peace of the world. They sought to rule the Church, rather than the
+world. They aimed at a theocratic ministry,--to be the ambassadors of
+God Almighty,--to allay strife and division.</p>
+
+<p>The clergy were the friends of order and law, and they were the natural
+guardians of learning. They were kind masters to the slaves,--for
+slavery still prevailed. That was an evil with which the clergy did not
+grapple; they would ameliorate it, but did not seek to remove it. Yet
+they shielded the unfortunate and the persecuted and the poor; they gave
+the only consolation which an iron age afforded. The Church was gloomy,
+ascetic, austere, like the cathedrals of that time. Monks buried
+themselves in crypts; they sang mournful songs; they saw nothing but
+poverty and misery, and they came to the relief in a funereal way. But
+they were not cold and hard and cruel, like baronial lords. Secular
+lords were rapacious, and ground down the people, and mocked and
+trampled upon them; but the clergy were hospitable, gentle, and
+affectionate. They sympathized with the people, from whom they chiefly
+sprang. They had their vices, but those vices were not half so revolting
+as those of barons and knights. Intellectually, the clergy were at all
+times the superiors of these secular lords. They loved the peaceful
+virtues which were generated in the consecrated convent. The passions of
+nobles urged them on to perpetual pillage, injustice, and cruelty. The
+clergy only quarrelled among themselves. Their vices were those of envy,
+and perhaps of gluttony; but they were not public robbers. They were
+the best farmers of their times; they cultivated lands, and made them
+attractive by fruits and flowers. They were generally industrious; every
+convent was a beehive, in which various kinds of manufactures were
+produced. The monks aspired even to be artists. They illuminated
+manuscripts, as well as copied them; they made tapestries and beautiful
+vestments. They were a peaceful and useful set of men, at this period
+outside their spiritual functions; they built grand churches; they had
+fruitful gardens; they were exceedingly hospitable. Every monastery was
+an inn, as well as a beehive, to which all travellers resorted, and
+where no pay was exacted. It was a retreat for the unfortunate, which no
+one dared assail. And it was vocal with songs and anthems.</p>
+
+<p>The clergy were not only thus general benefactors in an age of
+turbulence and crime, in spite of all their narrowness and spiritual
+pride and ghostly arts and ambition for power, but they lent a helping
+hand to the peasantry. The Church was democratic, and enabled the poor
+to rise according to their merits, while nobles combined to crush them
+or keep them in an ignoble sphere. In the Church, the son of a murdered
+peasant could rise according to his deserts; but if he followed a
+warrior to the battle-field, no virtues, no talents, no bravery could
+elevate him,--he was still a peasant, a low-born menial. If he entered
+a monastery, he might pass from office to office until as a mitred abbot
+he would become the master of ten thousand acres, the counsellor of
+kings, the equal of that proud baron in whose service his father spent
+his abject life. The great Hildebrand was the son of a carpenter. The
+Church ever recognized, what feudality did not,--the claims of man as
+man; and enabled peasants' sons, if they had abilities and virtues, to
+rise to proud positions,--to be the patrons of the learned, the
+companions of princes, the ministers of kings.</p>
+
+<p>And that is the reason why Charlemagne befriended the Church and
+elevated it, because its influence was civilizing. He sought to
+establish among the clergy a counterbalancing power to that of nobles.
+Who can doubt that the influence of the Church was better than that of
+nobles in the Middle Ages? If it ground down society by a spiritual
+yoke, that yoke was necessary, for the rude Middle Ages could be ruled
+only by fear. What fear more potent than the destruction of the soul in
+a future life! It was by this weapon--excommunication--that Europe was
+governed. We may abhor it, but it was the great idea of Mediaeval
+Europe, which no one could resist, and which kept society from
+dissolution. Charlemagne may have erred in thus giving power and
+consideration to the clergy, in view of the subsequent encroachments of
+the popes. But he never anticipated the future quarrels between his
+successors and the popes, for the popes were not then formidable as the
+antagonists of kings. I believe his policy was the best for Europe, on
+the whole. The infancy of the Gothic races was long, dark, dreary, and
+unfortunate, but it prepared them for the civilization which
+they scorned.</p>
+
+<p>Such were the services which this great sovereign rendered to his times
+and to Europe. He probably saved it from renewed barbarism. He was the
+great legislator of the Middle Ages, and the greatest friend--after
+Constantine and Theodosius--of which the Church can boast. With him
+dawned the new civilization. He brought back souvenirs of Rome and the
+Empire. Not for himself did he live, but for the welfare of the nations
+he governed. It was his example which Alfred sought to imitate. Though a
+warrior, he saw something greater than the warrior's excellence. It is
+said he was eloquent, like Julius Caesar. He loved music and all the
+arts. In his palace at Aix-la-Chapelle were sung the songs of the
+earliest poets of Germany. He took great pains to introduce the
+Gregorian chant. He was simple in dress, and only on rare occasions did
+he indulge in parade. He was temperate in eating and drinking, as all
+the famous warriors have been. He absolutely abhorred drunkenness, the
+great vice of the Northern nations. During meals he listened to the
+lays of minstrels or the readings of his secretaries. He took unwearied
+pains with the education of his daughters, and he was so fond of them
+that they even accompanied him in his military expeditions. He was not
+one of those men that Gibbon appreciated; but his fame is steadily
+growing, after a lapse of a thousand years. His whole appearance was
+manly, cheerful, and dignified. His countenance reflected a child-like
+serenity. He was one of the few men, like David, who was not spoiled by
+war and flatteries. Though gentle, he was subject to fits of anger, like
+Theodosius; but he did not affect anger, like Napoleon, for theatrical
+effect. His greatness and his simplicity, his humanity and his religious
+faith, are typical of the Germanic race. He died A.D. 814, after a reign
+of half a century, lamented by his own subjects and to be admired by
+succeeding generations. Hallam, though not eloquent generally, has
+pronounced his most beautiful eulogy, &quot;written in the disgraces and
+miseries of succeeding times. He stands alone like a rock in the ocean,
+like a beacon on a waste. His sceptre was the bow of Ulysses, not to be
+bent by a weaker hand. In the dark ages of European history, his reign
+affords a solitary resting-place between two dark periods of turbulence
+and ignominy, deriving the advantage of contrast both from that of the
+preceding dynasty and of a posterity for whom he had founded an empire
+which they were unworthy and unequal to maintain.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>To such a tribute I can add nothing. His greatness consists in this,
+that, born amidst barbarism, he was yet the friend of civilization, and
+understood its elemental principles, and struggled forty-seven years to
+establish them,--failing only because his successors and subjects were
+not prepared for them, and could not learn them until the severe
+experience of ten centuries, amidst disasters and storms, should prove
+the value of the &quot;old basal walls and pillars&quot; which remained unburied
+amid the despised ruins of antiquity, and show that no structure could
+adequately shelter the European nations which was not established by the
+beautiful union of German vigor with Christian art,--by the combined
+richness of native genius with those immortal treasures which had
+escaped the wreck of the classic world.</p>
+
+<p>AUTHORITIES.</p>
+
+<p>Eginhard's Vita Caroli Magni; Le Clerc's De la Bruy&egrave;re, Histoire du
+R&egrave;gne de Charlemagne; Haureau's Charlemagne et son Cour; Gaillard's
+Histoire de Charlemagne; Lorenz's Karls des Grossen. There is a
+tolerably popular history of Charlemagne by James Bulfinch, entitled
+&quot;Legends of Charlemagne;&quot; also a Life by James the novelist. Henri
+Martin, Sismondi, and Michelet may be consulted; also Hallam's Middle
+Ages, Milman's Latin Christianity, Gibbon's Decline and Fall of the
+Roman Empire, Biographic Universelle, and the Encyclopaedias.</p>
+
+
+<br><br><hr style="width: 35%;"><br><br>
+<h2><a name="HILDEBRAND."></a>HILDEBRAND.</h2>
+
+<hr style="width: 25%;">
+
+<p>A.D. 1020-1085.</p>
+
+<p>THE PAPAL EMPIRE.</p>
+
+<p>We associate with Hildebrand the great contest of the Middle Ages
+between spiritual and temporal authority, the triumph of the former, and
+its supremacy in Europe until the Reformation. What great ideas and
+events are interwoven with that majestic domination,--not in one age,
+but for fifteen centuries; not religious merely, but political,
+embracing as it were the whole progress of European society, from the
+fall of the Roman Empire to the Protestant Reformation; yea, intimately
+connected with the condition of Europe to the present day, and not of
+Europe only, but America itself! What an august power is this Catholic
+empire, equally great as an institution and as a religion! What lessons
+of human experience, what great truths of government, what subtile
+influences, reaching alike the palaces of kings and the hovels of
+peasants, are indissolubly linked with its marvellous domination, so
+that whether in its growth or decay it is more suggestive than the rise
+and fall of any temporal empire. It has produced, probably, more
+illustrious men than any political State in Europe. It has aimed to
+accomplish far grander ends. It is invested with more poetic interest.
+Its policy, its heroes, its saints, its doctors, its dignitaries, its
+missions, its persecutions, all rise up before us with varied but
+never-ending interest, when seriously contemplated. It has proved to be
+the most wonderful fabric of what we call worldly wisdom that our world
+has seen,--controlling kings, dictating laws to ancient monarchies, and
+binding the souls of millions with a more perfect despotism than
+Oriental emperors ever sought or dreamed. And what a marvellous vitality
+it seems to have! It has survived the attacks of its countless enemies;
+it has recovered from the shock of the Reformation; it still remains
+majestic and powerful, extending its arms of paternal love or Briarean
+terror over half of Christendom. As a temporal government, rivalling
+kings in the pomps of war and the pride of armies, it may be passing
+away; but as an organization to diffuse and conserve religious
+truths,--yea, even to bring a moral pressure on the minds of princes and
+governors, and reinforce its ranks with the mighty and the noble,--it
+seems to be as potent as ever. It is still sending its missionaries, its
+prelates, and its cardinals into the heart of Protestant countries, who
+anticipate and boast of new victories. It derides the dissensions and
+the rationalistic speculations of the Protestants, and predicts that
+they will either become open Pagans or re-enter the fold of Saint Peter.
+No longer do angry partisans call it the &quot;Beast&quot; or the &quot;Scarlet Mother&quot;
+or the &quot;predicted Antichrist,&quot; since its religious creeds in their vital
+points are more in harmony with the theology of venerated Fathers than
+those of some of the progressive and proudest parties which call
+themselves Protestant. In Germany, in France,--shall I add, in England
+and America?--it is more in earnest, and more laborious and self-denying
+than many sects among the Protestants. In Germany--in those very seats
+of learning and power and fashion which once were kindled into lofty
+enthusiasm by the voice of Luther--who is it that desert the churches
+and disregard the sacraments, the Catholics or the Protestants?</p>
+
+<p>Surely such a power, whether we view it as an institution or as a
+religion, cannot be despised, even by the narrowest and most fanatical
+Protestant. It is too grand and venerable for sarcasm, ridicule, or
+mockery. It is too potent and respectable to be sneered at or lied
+about. No cause can be advanced permanently except by adherence to the
+truth, whether it be agreeable or not. If the Papacy were a mere
+despotism, having nothing else in view than the inthralment of
+mankind,--of which it has been accused,--then mankind long ago, in lofty
+indignation, would have hurled it from its venerable throne. But
+despotic as its yoke is in the eyes of Protestants, and always has been
+and always may be, it is something more than that, having at heart the
+welfare of the very millions whom it rules by working on their fears. In
+spite of dogmas which are deductions from questionable premises, or
+which are at war with reason, and ritualism borrowed from other
+religions, and &quot;pious frauds,&quot; and Jesuitical means to compass desirable
+ends,--which Protestants indignantly discard, and which they maintain
+are antagonistic to the spirit of primitive Christianity,--still it is
+also the defender and advocate of vital Christian truths, to which we
+trace the hopes and consolations of mankind. As the conservator of
+doctrines common to all Christian sects it cannot be swept away by the
+hand of man; nor as a government, confining its officers and rules to
+the spiritual necessities of its members. Its empire is spiritual rather
+than temporal. Temporal monarchs are hurled from their thrones. The long
+line of the Bourbons vanishes before the tempests of revolution, and
+they who were borne into power by these tempests are in turn hurled into
+ignominious banishment; but the Pope--he still sits secure on the throne
+of the Gregories and the Clements, ready to pronounce benedictions or
+hurl anathemas, to which half of Europe bows in fear or love.</p>
+
+<p>Whence this strange vitality? What are the elements of a power so
+enduring and so irresistible? What has given to it its greatness and its
+dignity? I confess I gaze upon it as a peasant surveys a king, as a boy
+contemplates a queen of beauty,--as something which may be talked about,
+yet removed beyond our influence, and no more affected by our praise or
+censure than is a procession of cardinals by the gaze of admiring
+spectators in Saint Peter's Church. Who can measure it, or analyze it,
+or comprehend it? The weapons of reason appear to fall impotent before
+its haughty dogmatism. Genius cannot reconcile its inconsistencies.
+Serenely it sits, unmoved amid all the aggressions of human thought and
+all the triumphs of modern science. It is both lofty and degraded;
+simple, yet worldly wise; humble, yet scornful and proud; washing
+beggars' feet, yet imposing commands on the potentates of earth;
+benignant, yet severe on all who rebel; here clothed in rags, and there
+revelling in palaces; supported by charities, yet feasting the princes
+of the earth; assuming the title of &quot;servant of the servants of God,&quot;
+yet arrogating the highest seat among worldly dignitaries. Was there
+ever such a contradiction?--&quot;glory in debasement, and debasement in
+glory,&quot;--type of the misery and greatness of man? Was there ever such a
+mystery, so occult are its arts, so subtile its policy, so plausible its
+pretensions, so certain its shafts? How imposing the words of paternal
+benediction! How grand the liturgy brought down from ages of faith! How
+absorbed with beatific devotion appears to be the worshipper at its
+consecrated altars! How ravishing the music and the chants of grand
+ceremonials! How typical the churches and consecrated monuments of the
+passion of Christ! Everywhere you see the great emblem of our
+redemption,--on the loftiest pinnacle of the Mediaeval cathedral, on the
+dresses of the priests, over the gorgeous altars, in the ceremony of the
+Mass, in the baptismal rite, in the paintings of the side chapels;
+everywhere are rites and emblems betokening maceration, grief,
+sacrifice, penitence, the humiliation of humanity before the awful power
+of divine Omnipotence, whose personality and moral government no
+Catholic dares openly to deny.</p>
+
+<p>And yet, of what crimes and abominations has not this government been,
+accused? If we go back to darker ages, and accept what history records,
+what wars has not this Church encouraged, what discords has she not
+incited, what superstitions has she not indorsed, what pride has she not
+arrogated, what cruelties has she not inflicted, what countries has she
+not robbed, what hardships has she not imposed, what deceptions has she
+not used, what avenues of thought has she not guarded with a flaming
+sword, what truth has she not perverted, what goodness has she not
+mocked and persecuted? Ah, interrogate the Albigenses, the Waldenses,
+the shades of Jerome of Prague, of Huss, of Savonarola, of Cranmer, of
+Coligny, of Galileo; interrogate the martyrs of the Thirty Years' War,
+and those who were slain by the dragonnades of Louis XIV., those who
+fell by the hand of Alva and Charles IX.; go to Smithfield, and Paris on
+Saint Bartholomew; think of gunpowder plots and inquisitions, and Jesuit
+intrigues and Dominican tortures, of which history accuses the Papal
+Church,--barbarities worse than those of savages, inflicted at the
+command of the ministers of a gospel of love!</p>
+
+<p>I am compelled to allude to these things; I do not dwell on them, since
+they were the result of the intolerance of human nature as much as the
+bigotry of the Church,--faults of an age, more than of a religion;
+although, whether exaggerated or not, more disgraceful than the
+persecutions of Christians by Roman emperors.</p>
+
+<p>As for the supreme rulers of this contradictory Church, so benevolent
+and yet so cruel, so enlightened and yet so fanatical, so humble and yet
+so proud,--this institution of blended piety and fraud, equally renowned
+for saints, theologians, statesmen, drivellers, and fanatics; the joy
+and the reproach, the glory and the shame of earth,--there never were
+greater geniuses or greater fools: saints of almost preternatural
+sanctity, like the first Leo and Gregory, or hounds like Boniface VIII.
+or Alexander VI.; an array of scholars and dunces, ascetics and
+gluttons, men who adorned and men who scandalized their lofty position;
+and yet, on the whole, we are forced to admit, the most remarkable body
+of rulers any empire has known, since they were elevated by their peers,
+and generally for talents or services, at a period of life when
+character is formed and experience is matured. They were not greater
+than their Church or their age, like the Charlemagnes and Peters of
+secular history, but they were the picked men, the best representatives
+of their Church; ambitious, doubtless, and worldly, as great potentates
+generally are, but made so by the circumstances which controlled them.
+Who can wield irresponsible power and not become arrogant, and perhaps
+self-indulgent? It requires the almost superhuman virtue of a Marcus
+Aurelius or a Saint Louis to crucify the pride of rank and power. If the
+president of a college or of a railroad or of a bank becomes a different
+man to the eye of an early friend, what can be expected of those who are
+raised above public opinion, and have no fetters on their wills,--men
+who are regarded as infallible and feel themselves supreme!</p>
+
+<p>But of all these three hundred or four hundred men who have swayed the
+destinies of Europe,--an uninterrupted line of pontiffs for fifteen
+hundred years or more,--no one is so famous as Gregory VII. for the
+grandeur of his character, the heroism of his struggles, and the
+posthumous influence of his deeds. He was too great a man to be called
+by his papal title. He is best known by his baptismal name, Hildebrand,
+the greatest hero of the Roman Church. There are some men whose titles
+add nothing to their august names,--David, Julius, Constantine,
+Augustine. When a man has become very eminent we drop titles altogether,
+except in military life. We say Daniel Webster, Edward Everett, Jonathan
+Edwards, Thomas Jefferson, Benjamin Franklin, William Pitt. Hildebrand
+is a greater name than Gregory VII., and with him is identified the
+greatest struggle of the Papacy against the temporal powers. I do not
+aim to dissect his character so much as to present his services to the
+Church. I wish to show why and how he is identified with movements of
+supreme historical importance. It would be easy to make him out a saint
+and martyr, and equally so to paint him as a tyrant and usurper. It is
+of little consequence to us whether he was ascetic or ambitious or
+unscrupulous; but it <i>is</i> of consequence to show the majestic power of
+those ideas by which he ruled the Middle Ages, and which will never pass
+away as sublime agencies so long as men are ignorant and superstitious.
+As a man he no longer lives, but his thunderbolts are perpetual powers,
+since they still alarm the fears of men.</p>
+
+<p>Still, his personal history is not uninteresting. Born of humble
+parents in Italy in the year 1020, the son of a carpenter, he rose by
+genius and virtue to the highest offices and dignities. But his
+greatness was in force of character rather than original ideas,--like
+that of Washington, or William III., or the Duke of Wellington. He had
+not the comprehensive intellect of Charlemagne, nor the creative genius
+of Peter of Russia, but he had the sagacity of Richelieu and the iron
+will of Napoleon. He was statesman as well as priest,--marvellous for
+his activity, insight into human nature, vast executive abilities, and
+dauntless heroism. He comprehended the only way whereby Christendom
+could be governed, and unscrupulously used the means of success. He was
+not a great scholar, or theologian, or philosopher, but a man of action,
+embracing opportunities and striking decisive blows. From first to last
+he was devoted to his cause, which was greater than himself,--even the
+spiritual supremacy of the Papacy. I do not read of great intellectual
+precocity, like that of Cicero and William Pitt, nor of great
+attainments, like those of Ab&eacute;lard and Thomas Aquinas, nor even an
+insight, like that of Bacon, into what constitutes the dignity of man
+and the true glory of civilization; but, like Ambrose and the first Leo,
+he was early selected for important missions and responsible trusts, all
+of which he discharged with great fidelity and ability. His education
+was directed by the monks of Cluny,--that princely abbey in Burgundy
+where &quot;monks were sovereigns and sovereigns were monks.&quot; Like all
+earnest monks, he was ascetic, devotional, and self-sacrificing. Like
+all men ambitious to rule, &quot;he learned how to obey.&quot; He pondered on the
+Holy Scriptures as well as on the canons of the Church. So marked a man
+was he that he was early chosen as prior of his convent; and so great
+were his personal magnetism, eloquence, and influence that &quot;he induced
+Bruno, the Bishop of Toul, when elected pope by the Emperor of Germany,
+to lay aside the badges and vestments of the pontifical office, and
+refuse his title, until he should be elected by the clergy and people of
+Rome,&quot;--thus showing that at the age of twenty-nine he comprehended the
+issues of the day, and meditated on the gigantic changes it was
+necessary to make before the pope could be the supreme ruler of
+Christendom.</p>
+
+<p>The autocratic idea of Leo I., and the great Gregory who sent his
+missionaries to England, was that to which Hildebrand's ardent soul
+clung with preternatural earnestness, as the only government fit for
+turbulent and superstitious ages. He did not originate this idea, but he
+defended and enforced it as had never been done before, so that to many
+minds he was the great architect of the papal structure. It was a rare
+spectacle to see a sovereign pontiff lay aside the insignia of his
+grandeur at the bidding of this monk of Cluny; it was grander to see
+this monk laying the foundation of an irresistible despotism, which was
+to last beyond the time of Luther. Not merely was Leo IX. his tool, but
+three successive popes were chosen at his dictation. And when he became
+cardinal and archdeacon he seems to have been the inspiring genius of
+the papal government, undertaking the most important missions, curbing
+the turbulent spirit of the Roman princes, and assisting in all
+ecclesiastical councils. It was by his suggestion that abbots were
+deposed, and bishops punished, and monarchs reprimanded. He was the
+prime minister of four popes before he accepted that high office to
+which he doubtless had aspired while meditating as a monk amid the sunny
+slopes of Cluny, since he knew that the exigences of the Church required
+a bold and able ruler,--and who in Christendom was bolder and more
+far-reaching than he? He might have been elevated to the chair of Saint
+Peter at an earlier period, but he was contented with power rather than
+glory, knowing that his day would come, and at a time when his
+extraordinary abilities would be most needed. He could afford to wait;
+and no man is truly great who cannot bide his time.</p>
+
+<p>At last Hildebrand received the reward of his great services,--&quot;a
+reward,&quot; says Stephen, &quot;which he had long contemplated, but which, with
+self-controlling policy, he had so long declined.&quot; In the year 1073
+Hildebrand became Gregory VII., and his memorable pontificate began as a
+reformer of the abuses of his age, and the intrepid defender of that
+unlimited and absolute despotism which inthralled not merely the princes
+of Europe, but the mind of Christendom itself. It was he who not only
+proclaimed the liberties of the people against nobles, and made the
+Church an asylum for misery and oppression, but who realized the idea
+that the Church was the mother of spiritual principles, and that the
+spiritual authority should be raised over all temporal power.</p>
+
+<p>In the great crises of States and Empires deliverers seem to be raised
+up by Divine Providence to restore peace and order, and maintain the
+first condition of society, or extricate nations from overwhelming
+calamities. Thus Charlemagne appeared at the right time to prevent the
+overthrow of Europe by new waves of barbaric invasion. Thus William the
+Silent preserved the nationality of Holland, and Gustavus Adolphus gave
+religious liberty to Germany when persecution was apparently successful.
+Thus Richelieu undermined feudalism in France, and established
+absolutism as one of the needed forces of his turbulent age, even as
+Napoleon gave law and order to France when distracted by the anarchism
+of a revolution which did not comprehend the liberty which was invoked.
+So Hildebrand was raised up to establish the only government which could
+rescue Europe from the rapacities of feudal nobles, and establish law
+and order in the hands of the most enlightened class; so that, like
+Peter the Great, he looms up as a reformer as well as a despot. He
+appears in a double light.</p>
+
+<p>Now you ask: &quot;What were his reforms, and what were his schemes of
+aggrandizement, for which we honor him while we denounce him?&quot; We cannot
+see the reforms he attempted without glancing at the enormous evils
+which stared him in the face.</p>
+
+<p>Society in Europe, in the eleventh century, was nearly as dark and
+degraded as it was on the fall of the Merovingian dynasty. In some
+respects it had reached the lowest depth of wretchedness which the
+Middle Ages ever saw. Never had the clergy been more ignorant, more
+sensual, and more worldly. They had not the piety of the fourth century,
+nor the intelligence of the sixteenth century; they were powerful and
+wealthy, but exceedingly corrupt. Monastic institutions covered the face
+of Europe, but the monks had sadly departed from the virtues which
+partially redeemed the miseries that succeeded the fall of the Roman
+Empire. The lives of the clergy, regular and secular, still compared
+favorably with the lives of the feudal nobility, who had, in addition to
+priestly vices, the vices of robbers and bandits. But still the clergy
+were notoriously ignorant, superstitious, and sensual. Monasteries
+sought to be independent of all foreign control and of episcopal
+jurisdiction. They had been enormously enriched by princes and barons,
+and they owned, with the other clergy, half the lands of Europe, and
+more than half its silver and gold. The monks fattened on all the
+luxuries which then were known; they neglected the rules of their order
+and lived in idleness,--spending their time in the chase, or in taverns
+and brothels. Hardly a great scholar or theologian had arisen among them
+since the Patristic age, with the exception of a few schoolmen like
+Anselm and Peter Lombard. Saint Bernard had not yet appeared to reform
+the Benedictines, nor Dominic and Saint Francis to found new orders.
+Gluttony and idleness were perhaps the characteristic vices of the great
+body of the monks, who numbered over one hundred thousand. Hunting and
+hawking were the most innocent of their amusements. They have been
+accused of drinking toasts in honor of the Devil, and celebrating Mass
+in a state of intoxication. &quot;Not one in a thousand,&quot; says Hallam, &quot;could
+address to one another a common letter of salutation.&quot; They were a
+walking libel on everything sacred. Read the account of their banquets
+in the annals which have come down to us of the tenth and eleventh
+centuries, when convents were so numerous and rich. If Dugdale is to be
+credited, their gluttony exceeded that of any previous or succeeding
+age. Their cupidity, their drunken revels, their infamous haunts, their
+disgusting coarseness, their hypocrisy, ignorance, selfishness, and
+superstition were notorious. Yet the monks were not worse than the
+secular clergy, high and low. Bishoprics and all benefices were bought
+and sold; &quot;canons were trodden under foot; ancient traditions were
+turned out of doors; old customs were laid aside;&quot; boys were made
+archbishops; ludicrous stories were recited in the churches; the most
+disgraceful crimes were pardoned for money. Desolation, according to
+Cardinal Baronius, was seen in the temples of the Lord. As Petrarch said
+of Avignon in a better age, &quot;There is no pity, no charity, no faith, no
+fear of God. The air, the streets, the houses, the markets, the beds,
+the hotels, the churches, even the altars consecrated to God, are all
+peopled with knaves and liars;&quot; or, to use the still stronger language
+of a great reviewer, &quot;The gates of hell appeared to roll back on their
+infernal hinges, that there might go forth malignant spirits to empty
+the vials of wrath on the patrimony even of the great chief of the
+apostles.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>These vices, it is true, were not confined to the clergy. All classes
+were alike forlorn, miserable, and corrupt. It was a gloomy period. The
+Church, whenever religious, was sad and despairing. The contemplative
+hid themselves in noisome and sepulchral crypts. The inspiring chants of
+Ambrose gave place to gloomy and monotonous antiphonal singing,--that
+is, when the monks confined themselves to their dismal vocation. What
+was especially needed was a reform among the clergy themselves. They
+indeed owned their allegiance to the Pope, as the supreme head of the
+Church, but their fealty was becoming a mockery. They could not support
+the throne of absolutism if they were not respected by the laity.
+Baronial and feudal power was rapidly gaining over spiritual, and this
+was a poor exchange for the power of the clergy, if it led to violence
+and rapine. It is to maintain law and order, justice and safety, that
+all governments are established.</p>
+
+<p>Hildebrand saw and lamented the countless evils of the day, especially
+those which were loosening the bands of clerical obedience, and
+undermining the absolutism which had become the great necessity of his
+age. He made up his mind to reform these evils. No pope before him had
+seriously undertaken this gigantic task. The popes who for two hundred
+years had preceded him were a scandal and a reproach to their exalted
+position. These heirs of Saint Peter wasted their patrimony in pleasures
+and pomps. At no period of the papal history was the papal chair filled
+with such bad or incompetent men. Of these popes two were murdered, five
+were driven into exile, and four were deposed. Some were raised to
+prominence by arms, and others by money. John X. commanded an army in
+person; John XI. died in a fit of debauchery; and John XII. was
+murdered by one of the infamous women whom he patronized. Benedict IX.
+was driven from the throne by robbery and murder, while Gregory VI.
+purchased the papal dignity. For two hundred years no commanding
+character had worn the tiara.</p>
+
+<p>Hildebrand, however, set a new example, and became a watchful shepherd
+of his fold. His private life was without reproach; he was absorbed in
+his duties; he sympathized with learning and learned men. He was the
+friend of Lanfranc, and it was by his influence that this great prelate
+was appointed to the See of Canterbury, and a closer union was formed
+with England. He infused by his example a quiet but noble courage into
+the soul of Anselm. He had great faults, of course,--faults of his own
+and faults of his age. I wonder why so <i>strong</i> a man has escaped the
+admiring eulogium of Carlyle. Guizot compares him with the Russian
+Peter. In some respects he reminds me of Oliver Cromwell; since both
+equally deplored the evils of the day, and both invoked the aid of God
+Almighty. Both were ambitious, and unscrupulous in the use of tools.
+Neither of them was stained by vulgar vices, nor seduced from his course
+by love of ease or pleasure. Both are to be contemplated in the double
+light of reformer and usurper. Both were honest, and both were
+unscrupulous; honest in seeking to promote public morality and the
+welfare of society, and unscrupulous in the arts by which their power
+was gained.</p>
+
+<p>That which filled the soul of Hildebrand with especial grief was the
+alienation of the clergy from their highest duties, their worldly lives,
+and their frail support in his efforts to elevate the spiritual power.
+Therefore he determined to make a reform of the clergy themselves,
+having in view all the time their assistance in establishing the papal
+supremacy. He attacked the clergy where they were weakest. They--the
+secular ones, the parish priests--were getting married, especially in
+Germany and France. They were setting at defiance the laws of celibacy;
+they not only sought wives, but they lived in concubinage.</p>
+
+<p>Now celibacy had been regarded as the supernal virtue from the time of
+Saint Jerome. It was supposed to be a state most favorable to Christian
+perfection; it animated the existence of the most noted saints. Says
+Jerome, &quot;Take axe in hand and hew down the sterile tree of marriage.&quot;
+This notion of the superior virtue of virginity was one of the fruits of
+those Eastern theogonies which were engrafted on the early Church,
+growing out of the Oriental idea of the inalienable evil of matter. It
+was one of the fundamental principles of monasticism; and monasticism,
+wherever born--whether in India or the Syrian deserts--was one of the
+established institutions of the Church. It was indorsed by Benedict as
+well as by Basil; it had taken possession of the minds of the Gothic
+nations more firmly even than of the Eastern. The East never saw such
+monasteries as those which covered Italy, France, Germany, and England;
+they were more needed among the feudal robbers of Europe than in the
+effeminate monarchies of Asia. Moreover it was in monasteries that the
+popes had ever found their strongest adherents, their most zealous
+supporters. Without the aid of convents the papal empire might have
+crumbled. Monasticism and the papacy were strongly allied; one supported
+the other. So efficient were monastic institutions in advocating the
+idea of a theocracy, as upheld by the popes, that they were exempted
+from episcopal authority. An abbot was as powerful and independent as a
+bishop. But to make the Papacy supreme it was necessary to call in the
+aid of the secular priests likewise. Unmarried priests, being more like
+monks, were more efficient supporters of the papal throne. To maintain
+celibacy, therefore, was always in accordance with papal policy.</p>
+
+<p>But Nature had gradually asserted its claims over tradition and
+authority. The clergy, especially in France and Germany, were setting at
+defiance the edicts of popes and councils. The glory of celibacy was in
+an eclipse.</p>
+
+<p>No one comprehended the necessity of celibacy, among the clergy, more
+clearly than Hildebrand,--himself a monk by education and sympathy. He
+looked upon married life, with all its hallowed beauty, as a profanation
+for a priest. In his eyes the clergy were married only to the Church.
+&quot;Domestic affections suited ill with the duties of a theocratic
+ministry.&quot; Anything which diverted the labors of the clergy from the
+Church seemed to him an outrage and a degeneracy. How could they reach
+the state of beatific existence if they were to listen to the prattle of
+children, or be engrossed with the joys of conjugal or parental love? So
+he assembled a council, and caused it to pass canons to the effect that
+married priests should not perform any clerical office; that the people
+should not even be present at Mass celebrated by them; that all who had
+wives--or concubines, as he called them--should put them away; and that
+no one should be ordained who did not promise to remain unmarried during
+his whole life.</p>
+
+<p>Of course there was a violent opposition. A great outcry was raised,
+especially in Germany. The whole body of the secular priests exclaimed
+against the proceeding. At Mentz they threatened the life of the
+archbishop, who attempted to enforce the decree. At Paris a numerous
+synod was assembled, in which it was voted that Gregory ought not here
+to be obeyed. But Gregory was stronger than his rebellious
+clergy,--stronger than the instincts of human nature, stronger than the
+united voice of reason and Scripture. He fell back on the majestic
+power of prevailing ideas, on the ascetic element of the early Church,
+on the traditions of monastic life. He was supported by more than a
+hundred thousand monks, by the superstitions of primitive ages, by the
+example of saints and martyrs, by his own elevated rank, by the
+allegiance due to him as head of the Church. Excommunications were
+hurled, like thunderbolts, into remotest hamlets, and the murmurs of
+indignant Christendom were silenced by the awful denunciations of God's
+supposed vicegerent. The clergy succumbed before such a terrible
+spiritual force, The fear of hell--the great idea by which the priests
+themselves controlled their flocks--was more potent than any temporal
+good. What priest in that age would dare resist his spiritual monarch on
+almost any point, and especially when disobedience was supposed to
+entail the burnings of a physical hell forever and ever? So celibacy was
+re-established as a law of the Christian Church at the bidding of that
+far-seeing genius who had devised the means of spiritual despotism. That
+law--so gloomy, so unnatural, so fraught with evil--has never been
+repealed; it still rules the Catholic priesthood of Europe and America.
+Nor will it be repealed so long as the ideas of the Middle Ages have
+more force than enlightened reason. It is an abominable law, but who can
+doubt its efficacy in cementing the power of the popes?</p>
+
+<p>But simony, or the sale of ecclesiastical benefices, was a still more
+alarming evil to the mind of Gregory. It was the great scandal of the
+Church and age. Here we honor the Pope for striving to remove it. And
+yet its abolition was no easy thing. He came in contact with the
+selfishness of barons and kings. He found it an easier matter to take
+away the wives of priests than the purses of princes. Priests who had
+vowed obedience might consent to the repudiation of their wives, but
+would great temporal robbers part with their spoils? The sale of
+benefices was one great source of royal and baronial revenues.
+Bishoprics, once conferred for wisdom and piety, had become prizes for
+the rapacious and ambitious. Bishops and abbots were most frequently
+chosen from the ranks of the great. Powerful Sees were the gifts of
+kings to their favorites or families, or were bought by the wealthy; so
+that worldly or incapable men were made overseers of the Church of
+Christ. The clergy were in danger of being hopelessly secularized. And
+the evil spread to the extremities of the clerical body. The princes and
+barons were getting control of the Church itself. Bishops often
+possessed a plurality of Sees. Children were elevated to episcopal
+thrones. Sycophants, courtiers, jesters, imbecile sons of princes,
+became great ecclesiastical dignitaries. Who can wonder at the
+degeneracy of the clergy when they held their cures at the hands of lay
+patrons, to whom they swore allegiance for the temporalities of their
+benefices? Even the ring and the crozier, the emblems of spiritual
+authority,--once received at the hand of metropolitan archbishops alone,
+were now bestowed by temporal sovereigns, who claimed thereby fealty and
+allegiance; so that princes had gradually usurped the old rights of the
+Church, and Gregory resolved to recover them. So long as emperors and
+kings could fill the rich bishoprics and abbacies with their creatures,
+the papal dominion was weakened in its most vital point, and might
+become a dream. This evil was rapidly undermining the whole
+ecclesiastical edifice, and it required a hero of prodigious genius,
+energy, and influence to reform it.</p>
+
+<p>Hildebrand saw and comprehended the whole extent and bearing of the
+evil, and resolved to remove it or die in the attempt. It was not only
+undermining his throne, but was secularizing the Church and destroying
+the real power of the clergy. He made up his mind to face the difficulty
+in its most dreaded quarters. He knew that the attempt to remove this
+scandal would entail a desperate conflict with the princes of the earth.
+Before this, popes and princes were generally leagued together; they
+played into each other's hands: but now a battle was to be fought
+between the temporal and spiritual powers. He knew that princes would
+never relinquish so lucrative a source of profit as the sale of
+powerful Sees, unless the right to sell them were taken away by some
+tremendous conflict. He therefore prepared for the fight, and forged his
+weapons and gathered together his forces. Nor would he waste time by
+idle negotiations; it was necessary to act with promptness and vigor. No
+matter how great the danger; no matter how powerful his enemies. The
+Church was in peril; and he resolved to come to the rescue, cost what it
+might. What was his life compared with the sale of God's heritage? For
+what was he placed in the most exalted post of the Church, if not to
+defend her in an alarming crisis?'</p>
+
+<p>In resolving to separate forever the spiritual from the temporal power,
+Hildebrand followed in the footsteps of Ambrose. But he had also deeper
+designs. He resolved to raise, if possible, the spiritual <i>above</i> the
+temporal power. Kings should be subject to the Church, not the Church to
+the kings of the earth. He believed that he was the appointed vicar of
+the Almighty to rule the world in peace, on the principles of eternal
+love; that Christ had established a new theocracy, and had delegated his
+power to the Apostle Peter, which had descended to the Pope as the
+Apostle's legitimate successor.</p>
+
+<p>I say nothing here of this monstrous claim, of this ingenious falsehood,
+on which the monarchical power of the Papacy rests. It is the great
+fraud of the Middle Ages. And yet, but for this theocratic idea, it is
+difficult to see how the external unity of the Church could have been
+preserved among the semi-barbarians of Europe. And what a necessary
+thing it was--in ages of superstition, ignorance, and anarchy--to
+preserve the unity of the Church, to establish a spiritual power which
+should awe and control barbaric princes! There are two sides to the
+supremacy of the popes as head of the Church, when we consider the
+aspect and state of society in those iron and lawless times. Would
+Providence have permitted such a power to rule for a thousand years had
+it not been a necessity? At any rate, this is too complicated a question
+for me to discuss. It is enough for me to describe the conflict for
+principles, not to attempt to settle them. In this matter I am not a
+partisan, but a painter. I seek to describe a battle, not to defend
+either this cause or that. I have my opinions, but this is no place to
+present them. I seek to describe simply the great battle of the Middle
+Ages, and you can draw your own conclusions as to the merits of the
+respective causes. I present the battle of heroes,--a battle worthy of
+the muse of Homer.</p>
+
+<p>Hildebrand in this battle disdained to fight with any but great and
+noble antagonists. As the friend of the poor man, crushed and mocked by
+a cold and unfeeling nobility; as the protector of the Church, in danger
+of being subverted by the unhallowed tyranny and greed of princes; as
+the consecrated monarch of a great spiritual fraternity,--he resolved to
+face the mightiest monarchs, and suffer, and if need be die, for a cause
+which he regarded as the hope and salvation of Europe. Therefore he
+convened another council, and prohibited, under the terrible penalty of
+excommunication,--for that was his mighty weapon,--the investiture of
+bishoprics and abbacies at the hands of laymen: only he himself should
+give to ecclesiastics the ring and the crozier,--the badges of spiritual
+authority. And he equally threatened with eternal fire any bishop or
+abbot who should receive his dignity from the hand of a prince.</p>
+
+<p>This decree was especially aimed against the Emperor of Germany, to
+whom, as liege lord, the Pope himself owed fealty and obedience. Henry
+IV. was one of the mightiest monarchs of the Franconian dynasty,--a
+great warrior and a great man, beloved by his subjects and feared by the
+princes of Europe. But he, as well as Gregory, was resolved to maintain
+the rights of his predecessors. He also perceived the importance of the
+approaching contest. And what a contest! The spiritual and temporal
+powers were now to be arrayed against each other in a fierce antagonism.
+The apparent object of contention changed. It was not merely simony; it
+was as to who should be the supreme master of Germany and Italy, the
+emperor or the pope. To whom, in the eyes of contemporaries, would
+victory incline,--to the son of a carpenter, speaking in the name of the
+Church, and holding in his hands the consecrated weapon of
+excommunication; or the most powerful monarch of his age, armed with the
+secular sword, and seeking to restore the dignity of Roman emperors? The
+Pope is supported by the monks, the inferior clergy, and the vast
+spiritual powers universally supposed to be delegated to him by Christ,
+as the successor of Saint Peter; the Emperor is supported by large
+feudal armies, and all the prestige of the successors of Charlemagne. If
+the Pope appeals to an ancient custom of the Church, the Emperor appeals
+to a general feudal custom which required bishops and abbots to pay
+their homage to him for the temporalities of their Sees. The Pope has
+the canons of the Church on his side; the Emperor the laws of
+feudalism,--and both the canons of the Church and feudal principles are
+binding obligations. Hitherto they have not clashed. But now feudalism,
+very generally established, and papal absolutism, rapidly culminating,
+are to meet in angry collision. Shall the kings of the earth prevail,
+assisted by feudal armies and outward grandeur, and sustained by such
+powerful sentiments as loyalty and chivalry; or shall a priest, speaking
+in the name of God Almighty, and appealing to the future fears of men?</p>
+
+<p>What conflict grander and more sublime than this, in the whole history
+of society? What conflict proved more momentous in its results?</p>
+
+<p>I need not trace all the steps of that memorable contest, or describe
+the details, from the time when the Pope sent out his edicts and
+excommunicated all who dared to disobey him,--including some of the most
+eminent German prelates and German princes. Henry at this time was
+engaged in a desperate war with the Saxons, and Gregory seized this
+opportunity to summon the Emperor--his emperor--to appear before him at
+Rome and answer for alleged crimes against the Saxon Church. Was there
+ever such audacity? How could Henry help giving way to passionate
+indignation; he--the successor of the Roman Caesars, sovereign lord of
+Germany and Italy--summoned to the bar of a priest, and that priest his
+own subject, in a temporal sense? He was filled with wrath and defiance,
+and at once summoned a council of German bishops at Worms, &quot;who
+denounced the Pope as a usurper, a simonist, a murderer, a worshipper of
+the Devil, and pronounced upon him the empty sentence of a deposition&quot;</p>
+
+<p>&quot;The aged Hildebrand,&quot; in the words of Stephen, &quot;was holding a council
+in the second week of Lent, 1076, beneath the sculptured roof of the
+Vatican, arrayed in the rich and mystic vestments of pontifical
+dominion, and the papal choir were chanting those immortal anthems which
+had come down from blessed saints and martyrs, when the messenger of
+the Emperor presented himself before the assembled hierarchy of Rome,
+and with insolent demeanor and abrupt speech delivered the sentence of
+the German council.&quot; He was left unharmed by the indignant pontiff; but
+the next day ascending his throne, and in presence of the dignitaries of
+his Church, thus invoked the assistance of the pretended founder of
+his empire:--</p>
+
+<p>&quot;Saint Peter! lend us your ears, and listen to your servant whom you
+have cherished from his infancy; and all the saints also bear witness
+how the Roman Church raised me by force and against my will to this high
+dignity, although I should have preferred to spend my days in a
+continual pilgrimage than to ascend thy pulpit for any human motive. And
+inasmuch as I think it will be grateful to you that those intrusted to
+my care should obey me; therefore, supported by these hopes, and for the
+honor and defence of the Church, in the name of the Omnipotent
+God,--Father, Son, and Holy Ghost,--by my authority and power, I
+prohibit King Henry, who with unheard-of pride has raised himself
+against your Church, from governing the kingdoms of Germany and Italy; I
+absolve all Christians from the oath they have taken to him, and I
+forbid all men to yield to him that service which is due unto a king.
+Finally, I bind him with the bonds of anathema, that all people may know
+that thou art Peter, and that upon thee the Son of God hath built His
+Church, against which the gates of hell cannot prevail.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>This was an old-fashioned excommunication; and we in these days have but
+a faint idea what a dreadful thing it was, especially when accompanied
+with an interdict. The churches were everywhere shut; the dead were
+unburied in consecrated ground; the rites of religion were suspended;
+gloom and fear sat on every countenance; desolation overspread the land.
+The king was regarded as guilty and damned; his ministers looked upon
+him as a Samson shorn of his locks; his very wife feared contamination
+from his society; his children, as a man blasted with the malediction of
+Heaven. When a man was universally supposed to be cursed in the house
+and in the field; in the wood and in the church; in eating or drinking;
+in fasting or sleeping; in working or resting; in his arms, in his legs,
+in his heart, and in his head; living or dying; in this world and in the
+next,--what could he do?</p>
+
+<p>And what could Henry do, with all his greatness? His victorious armies
+deserted him; a rival prince laid claim to his throne; his enemies
+multiplied; his difficulties thickened; new dangers surrounded him on
+every side. If loyalty--that potent principle--had summoned one hundred
+thousand warriors to his camp, a principle much more powerful than
+loyalty--the fear of hell--had dispersed them. Even his friends joined
+the Pope. The sainted Agnes, his own mother, acquiesced in the sentence.
+The Countess Matilda, the richest lady in the world, threw all her
+treasures at the feet of her spiritual monarch. The moral sentiments of
+his own subjects were turned against him; he was regarded as justly
+condemned. The great princes of Germany sought his deposition. The world
+rejected him, the Church abandoned him, and God had forsaken him. He was
+prostrate, helpless, disarmed, ruined. True, he made superhuman efforts:
+he traversed his empire with the hope of rallying his subjects; he flew
+from city to city,--but all in vain. Every convent, every castle, every
+city of his vast dominions beheld in him the visitation of the Almighty.
+The diadem was obscured by the tiara, and loyalty itself yielded to the
+superior potency of religious fear. Only Bertha, his neglected wife, was
+faithful and trusting in that gloomy day; all else had defrauded and
+betrayed him. How bitter his humiliation! And yet his haughty foe was
+not contented with the punishment he had inflicted. He declared that if
+the sun went down on the 23d of February, 1077, before Henry was
+restored to the bosom of the Church, his crown should be transferred to
+another. That inexorable old pontiff laid claim to the right of giving
+and taking away imperial crowns. Was ever before seen such arrogance and
+audacity in a priest? And yet he knew that he would be sustained. He
+knew that his supremacy was based on a universally recognized idea. Who
+can resist the ideas of his age? Henry might have resisted, if
+resistance had been possible. Even he must yield to irresistible
+necessity. He was morally certain that he would lose his crown, and be
+in danger of losing his soul, unless he made his peace with his
+dangerous enemy. It was necessary that the awful curse should be
+removed. He had no remedy; only one course was before him. He must
+yield; not to man alone, but to an idea which had the force of fate.
+Wonder not that he made up his mind to submit. He was great, but not
+greater than his age. How few men are! Mohammed could renounce
+prevailing idolatries; Luther could burn a papal bull; but the Emperor
+of Germany could not resist the supposed vicegerent of the Almighty.</p>
+
+<p>Behold, then, the melancholy, pitiable spectacle of this mighty
+monarch in the depth of winter--and a winter of unprecedented
+severity--crossing, in the garb of a pilgrim, the frozen Alps, enduring
+the greatest privations and fatigues and perils, and approaching on foot
+the gloomy fortress of Canossa (beyond the Po), in which Hildebrand had
+intrenched himself. Even then the angry pontiff refused to see him.
+Henry had to stoop to a still deeper degradation,--to stand bareheaded
+and barefooted for three days, amid the blasts of winter, in the
+court-yard of the castle, before the Pope would promise absolution, and
+then only at the intercession of the Countess Matilda.</p>
+
+<p>What are we to think of such a fall, such a humiliation on the part of a
+sovereign? What are we to think of such haughtiness on the part of a
+priest,--his subject? We are filled with blended pity and indignation.
+We are inclined to say that this was the greatest blunder that any
+monarch ever made; that Henry--humbled and deserted and threatened as he
+was--should not have stooped to this; that he should have lost his crown
+and life rather than handed over his empire to a plebeian priest,--for
+he was an acknowledged hero; he was monarch of half of Europe. And yet
+we are bound to consider Henry's circumstances and the ideas with which
+he had to contend. His was the error of the Middle Ages; the feeblest of
+his modern successors would have killed the Pope if he could, rather
+than have disgraced himself by such an ignominy.</p>
+
+<p>True it is that Henry came to himself; that he repented of his step. But
+it was too late. Gregory had gained the victory; and it was all the
+greater because it was a moral one. It was known to all Europe and all
+the world, and would be known to all posterity, that the Emperor of
+Germany had bowed in submission to a foreign priest. The temporal power
+had yielded to the spiritual; the State had conceded the supremacy of
+the Church. The Pope had triumphed over the mightiest monarch of the
+age, and his successors would place their feet over future prostrate
+kings. What a victory! What mighty consequences were the result of it!
+On what a throne did this moral victory seat the future pontiffs of the
+Eternal City! How august their dominion, for it was over the minds and
+souls of men! Truly to the Pope were given the keys of Heaven and Hell;
+and so long as the ideas of that age were accepted, who could resist a
+man armed with the thunders of Omnipotence?</p>
+
+<p>It mattered nothing that the Emperor was ashamed of his weakness; that
+he retracted; that he vowed vengeance; that he marched at the head of
+new armies. No matter that his adherents were indignant; that all
+Germany wept; that loyalty rallied to his aid; that he gained victories
+proportionate with his former defeats; that he chased Gregory from city
+to city, and castle to castle, and convent to convent, while his
+generals burned the Pope's palaces and wasted his territories. No matter
+that Gregory--broken, defeated, miserable, outwardly ruined--died
+prematurely in exile; no matter that he did not, in his great reverses,
+anticipate the fruits of his firmness and heroism. His principles
+survived him; they have never been lost sight of by his successors;
+they gained strength through successive generations. Innocent III.
+reaped what he had sown. Kings dared not resist Innocent III., who
+realized those three things to which the more able Gregory had
+aspired,--&quot;independent sovereignty, control over the princes of the
+earth, and the supremacy of the Church.&quot; Innocent was the greater pope,
+but Hildebrand was the greater man.</p>
+
+<p>Yet, like so many of the great heroes of the world, he was not destined
+in his own person to reap the fruits of his heroism. &quot;I have loved
+righteousness and hated iniquity, and therefore I die in exile,&quot;--these
+were his last bitter words. He fancied he had failed. But did he fail?
+What did he leave behind? He left his great example and his still
+greater ideas. He left a legacy to his successors which makes them still
+potent on the earth, in spite of reformations and revolutions, and all
+the triumphs of literature and science. How mighty his deeds! How great
+his services to his Church! &quot;He found,&quot; says an eloquent and able
+Edinburgh reviewer, &quot;the papacy dependent on the emperor; he sustained
+it by alliances almost commensurate with the Italian peninsula. He found
+the papacy electoral by the Roman people and clergy; he left it
+electoral by papal nomination. He found the emperor the virtual patron
+of the Roman See; he wrenched that power from his hands. He found the
+secular clergy the allies and dependents of the secular power; he
+converted them into inalienable auxiliaries of his own. He found the
+patronage of the Church the desecrated spoil and merchandise of princes;
+he reduced it to his own dominion. He is celebrated as the reformer of
+the impure and profane abuses of his age; he is more justly entitled to
+the praise of having left the impress of his gigantic character on all
+the ages which have succeeded him.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>Such was the great Hildebrand; a conqueror, however, by the force of
+recognized ideas more than by his own strength. How long, you ask, shall
+his empire last? We cannot tell who can predict the fortunes of such a
+power. It is not for me to speculate or preach. In considering his life
+and career, I have simply attempted to paint one of the most memorable
+moral contests of the world; to show the power of genius and will in a
+superstitious age,--and, more, the majestic force of ideas over the
+minds and souls of men, even though these ideas cannot be sustained by
+reason or Scripture.</p>
+
+<p>AUTHORITIES.</p>
+
+<p>Epistles of Gregory VII.; Baronius's Annals; Dupin's Ecclesiastical
+History; Voigt, in his Hildebrand als Gregory VII.; Guizot's Lectures on
+Civilization; Sir James Stephens's article on Hildebrand, in Edinburgh
+Review; Dugdale's Monasticon; Hallam's Middle Ages; Digby's Ages of
+Faith; Jaffe's Regesta Pontificum Romanorum; Mignet's series of articles
+on La Lutte des Papes contre les Empereurs d'Allemagne; M. Villemain's
+Histoire de Gr&eacute;goire VII.; Bowden on the Life and Times of Hildebrand;
+Milman's Latin Christianity; Watterich's Romanorum Pontificum ab
+Aequalibus Conscriptae; Platina's Lives of the Popes; Stubbs's
+Constitutional History; Lee's History of Clerical Celibacy; Cardinal
+Newman's Essays; Lecky's History of European Morals; Dr. D&ouml;llinger's
+Church History; Neander's Church History; articles in Contemporary
+Review of July and August, 1882, on the Turning Point of the
+Middle Ages.</p>
+
+
+<br><br><hr style="width: 35%;"><br><br>
+<h2><a name="SAINT_BERNARD."></a>SAINT BERNARD.</h2>
+
+<hr style="width: 25%;">
+
+<p>A.D. 1091-1153.</p>
+
+<p>MONASTIC INSTITUTIONS.</p>
+
+<p>One of the oldest institutions of the Church is that which grew out of
+monastic life. It had its seat, at a remote period, in India. It has
+existed, in different forms, in other Oriental countries. It has been
+modified by Brahminical, Buddhistic, and Persian theogonies, and
+extended to Egypt, Syria, and Asia Minor. Go where you will in the East,
+and you see traces of its mighty influence. We cannot tell its remotest
+origin, but we see everywhere the force of its ideas. Its fundamental
+principle appears to be the desire to propitiate the Deity by penances
+and ascetic labors as an atonement for sin, or as a means of rising to a
+higher religious life. It has sought to escape the polluting influences
+of demoralized society by lofty contemplation and retirement from the
+world. From the first, it was a protest against materialism, luxury, and
+enervating pleasures. It recognized something higher and nobler than
+devotion to material gains, or a life of degrading pleasure. In one
+sense it was an intellectual movement, while in another it was an insult
+to the human understanding. It attempted a purer morality, but abnegated
+obvious and pressing duties. It was always a contradiction,--lofty while
+degraded, seeking to comprehend the profoundest mysteries, yet debased
+by puerile superstitions.</p>
+
+<p>The consciousness of mankind, in all ages and countries, has ever
+accepted retribution for sin--more or less permanent--in this world or
+in the next. And it has equally accepted the existence of a Supreme
+Intelligence and Power, to whom all are responsible, and in connection
+with whom human destinies are bound up. The deeper we penetrate into the
+occult wisdom of the East,--on which light has been shed by modern
+explorations, monumental inscriptions, manuscripts, historical records,
+and other things which science and genius have deciphered,--the surer we
+feel that the esoteric classes of India, Egypt, and China were more
+united in their views of Supreme Power and Intelligence than was
+generally supposed fifty years ago. The higher intellects of Asia, in
+all countries and ages, had more lofty ideas of God than we have a right
+to infer from the superstitions of the people generally. They had
+unenlightened ideas as to the grounds of forgiveness. But of the
+necessity of forgiveness and the favor of the Deity they had no doubt.</p>
+
+<p>The philosophical opinions of these sages gave direction to a great
+religious movement. Matter was supposed to be inherently evil, and mind
+was thought to be inherently good. The seat of evil was placed in the
+body rather than in the heart and mind. Not the thoughts of men were
+evil, but the passions and appetites of the body. Hence the first thing
+for a good man to do was to bring the body--this seat of evil--under
+subjection, and, if possible, to eradicate the passions and appetites
+which enslave the body; and this was to be done by self-flagellations,
+penances, austerities, and solitude,--flight from the contaminating
+influences of the world. All Oriental piety assumed this ascetic form.
+The transition was easy to the sundering of domestic ties, to the
+suppression of natural emotions and social enjoyments. The devotee
+became austere, cold, inhuman, unsocial. He shunned the habitations of
+men. And the more desirous he was to essay a high religious life and
+thus rise in favor with God, the more severe and revengeful and
+unforgiving he made the Deity he adored,--not a compassionate Creator
+and Father, but an irresistible Power bent on his destruction. This
+degrading view of the Deity, borrowed from Paganism, tinged the
+subsequent theology of the Christian monks, and entered largely into the
+theology of the Middle Ages.</p>
+
+<p>Such was the prevailing philosophy, or theosophy--both lofty and
+degraded--with which the Christian convert had to contend; not merely
+the shameless vices of the people, so open and flagrant as to call out
+disgust and indignation, but also the views which the more virtuous and
+religious of Pagan saints accepted and promulgated: and not saints
+alone, but those who made the greatest pretension to intellectual
+culture, like the Gnostics and Manicheans; those men who were the first
+to ensnare Saint Augustine,--specious, subtle, sophistical, as acute as
+the Brahmins of India. It was Eastern philosophy, false as we regard it,
+which created the most powerful institution that existed in Europe for
+above a thousand years,--an institution which all the learning and
+eloquence of the Reformers of the sixteenth century could not subvert,
+except in Protestant countries.</p>
+
+<p>Now what, more specifically, were the ideas which the early monks
+borrowed from India, Persia, and Egypt, which ultimately took such a
+firm hold of the European mind?</p>
+
+<p>One was the superior virtue of a life devoted to purely religious
+contemplation, and for the same end that animated the existence of
+fakirs and sofis. It was to escape the contaminating influence of
+matter, to rise above the wants of the body, to exterminate animal
+passions and appetites, to hide from a world which luxury corrupted. The
+Christian recluses were thus led to bury themselves in cells among the
+mountains and deserts, in dreary and uncomfortable caverns, in isolated
+retreats far from the habitation of men,--yea, among wild beasts,
+clothing themselves in their skins and eating their food, in order to
+commune with God more effectually, and propitiate His favor. Their
+thoughts were diverted from the miseries which they ought to have
+alleviated and the ignorance which they ought to have removed, and were
+concentrated upon themselves, not upon their relatives and neighbors.
+The cries of suffering humanity were disregarded in a vain attempt to
+practise doubtful virtues. How much good those pious recluses might have
+done, had their piety taken a more practical form! What missionaries
+they might have made, what self-denying laborers in the field of active
+philanthropy, what noble teachers to the poor and miserable! The
+conversion of the world to Christianity did not enter into their minds
+so much as the desire to swell the number of their communities. They
+only aimed at a dreamy pietism,--at best their own individual salvation,
+rather than the salvation of others. Instead of reaching to the beatific
+vision, they became ignorant, narrow, and visionary; and, when learned,
+they fought for words and not for things. They were advocates of subtile
+and metaphysical distinctions in theology, rather than of those
+practical duties and simple faith which primitive Christianity enjoined.
+Monastic life, no less than the schools of Alexandria, was influential
+in creating a divinity which gave as great authority to dogmas that are
+the result of intellectual deductions, as those based on direct and
+original declarations. And these deductions were often gloomy, and
+colored by the fears which were inseparable from a belief in divine
+wrath rather than divine love. The genius of monasticism, ancient and
+modern, is the propitiation of the Divinity who seeks to punish rather
+than to forgive. It invented Purgatory, to escape the awful burnings of
+an everlasting hell of physical sufferings. It pervaded the whole
+theology of the Middle Ages, filling hamlet and convent alike with an
+atmosphere of fear and wrath, and creating a cruel spiritual despotism.
+The recluse, isolated and lonely, consumed himself with phantoms,
+fancied devils, and &quot;chimeras dire.&quot; He could not escape from himself,
+although he might fly from society. As a means of grace he sought
+voluntary solitary confinement, without nutritious food or proper
+protection from the heat and cold, clad in a sheepskin filled with dirt
+and vermin. What life could be more antagonistic to enlightened reason?
+What mistake more fatal to everything like self-improvement, culture,
+knowledge, happiness? And all for what? To strive after an impossible
+perfection, or the solution of insoluble questions, or the favor of a
+Deity whose attributes he misunderstood.</p>
+
+<p>But this unnatural, unwise retirement was not the worst evil in
+the life of a primitive monk, with all its dreamy contemplation
+and silent despair. It was accompanied with the most painful
+austerities,--self-inflicted scourgings, lacerations, dire
+privations, to propitiate an angry deity, or to bring the body
+into a state which would be insensible to pain, or to exorcise
+passions which the imaginations inflamed. All this was based on
+penance,--self-expiation,--which entered so largely into the theogonies
+of the East, and which gave a gloomy form to the piety of the Middle
+Ages. This error was among the first to kindle the fiery protests of
+Luther. The repudiation of this error, and of its logical sequences, was
+one of the causes of the Reformation. This error cast its dismal shadow
+on the common life of the Middle Ages. You cannot penetrate the spirit
+of those centuries without a painful recognition of almost universal
+darkness and despair. How gloomy was a Gothic church before the eleventh
+century, with its dark and heavy crypt, its narrow windows, its massive
+pillars, its low roof, its cold, damp pavement, as if men went into that
+church to hide themselves and sing mournful songs,--the <i>Dies Irae</i> of
+monastic fear!</p>
+
+<p>But the primitive monks, with all their lofty self-sacrifices and
+efforts for holy meditation, towards the middle of the fourth century,
+as their number increased from the anarchies and miseries of a falling
+empire, became quarrelsome, sometimes turbulent, and generally fierce
+and fanatical. They had to be governed. They needed some master mind to
+control them, and confine them to their religious duties. Then arose
+Basil, a great scholar, and accustomed to civilized life in the schools
+of Athens and Constantinople, who gave rules and laws to the monks,
+gathered them into communities and discouraged social isolation, knowing
+that the demons had more power over men when they were alone and idle.</p>
+
+<p>This Basil was an extraordinary man. His ancestors were honorable and
+wealthy. He moved in the highest circle of social life, like Chrysostom.
+He was educated in the most famous schools. He travelled extensively
+like other young men of rank. His tutor was the celebrated Libanius, the
+greatest rhetorician of the day. He exhausted Antioch, Caesarea, and
+Constantinople, and completed his studies at Athens, where he formed a
+famous friendship with Gregory Nazianzen, which was as warm and devoted
+as that between Cicero and Atticus: these young men were the talk and
+admiration of Athens. Here, too, he was intimate with young Julian,
+afterwards the &quot;Apostate&quot; Emperor of Rome. Basil then visited the
+schools of Alexandria, and made the acquaintance of the great
+Athanasius, as well as of those monks who sought a retreat amid
+Egyptian solitudes. Here his conversion took place, and he parted with
+his princely patrimony for the benefit of the poor. He then entered the
+Church, and was successively ordained deacon and priest, while leading a
+monastic life. He retired among the mountains of Armenia, and made
+choice of a beautiful grove, watered with crystal streams, where he gave
+himself to study and meditation. Here he was joined by his friend
+Gregory Nazianzen and by enthusiastic admirers, who formed a religious
+fraternity, to whom he was a spiritual father. He afterwards was forced
+to accept the great See of Caesarea, and was no less renowned as bishop
+and orator than he had been as monk. Yet it is as a monk that he left
+the most enduring influence, since he made the first great change in
+monastic life,--making it more orderly, more industrious, and less
+fanatical.</p>
+
+<p>He instituted or embodied, among others, the three great vows, which are
+vital to monastic institutions,--Poverty, Obedience, and Chastity. In
+these vows he gave the institution a more Christian and a less Oriental
+aspect. Monachism became more practical and less visionary and wild. It
+approximated nearer to the Christian standard. Submission to poverty is
+certainly a Christian virtue, if voluntary poverty is not. Chastity is a
+cardinal duty. Obedience is a necessity to all civilized life. It is the
+first condition of all government.</p>
+
+<p>Moreover, these three vows seem to have been called for by the
+condition of society, and the prevalence of destructive views. Here
+Basil,--one of the commanding intellects of his day, and as learned and
+polished as he was pious,--like Jerome after him, proved himself a great
+legislator and administrator, including in his comprehensive view both
+Christian principles and the necessities of the times, and adapting his
+institution to both.</p>
+
+<p>One of the most obvious, flagrant, and universal evils of the day was
+devotion to money-making in order to purchase sensual pleasures. It
+pervaded Roman life from the time of Augustus. The vow of poverty,
+therefore, was a stern, lofty, disdainful protest against the most
+dangerous and demoralizing evil of the Empire. It hurled scorn, hatred,
+and defiance on this overwhelming evil, and invoked the aid of
+Christianity. It was simply the earnest affirmation and belief that
+money could not buy the higher joys of earth, and might jeopardize the
+hopes of heaven. It called to mind the greatest examples; it showed that
+the great teachers of mankind, the sages and prophets of history, had
+disdained money as the highest good; that riches exposed men to great
+temptation, and lowered the standard of morality and virtue,--&quot;how
+hardly shall they who have riches enter into the kingdom of God!&quot; It
+appealed to the highest form of self-sacrifice; it arrayed itself
+against a vice which was undermining society. And among truly Christian
+people this new application of Christ's warnings against the dangers of
+wealth excited enthusiasm. It was like enlisting in the army of Christ
+against his greatest enemies. Make any duty clear and imperious to
+Christian people, and they will generally conform to it. So the world
+saw one of the most impressive spectacles of all history,--the rich
+giving up their possessions to follow the example and injunctions of
+Christ. It was the most signal test of Christian obedience. It prompted
+Paula, the richest lady of Christian antiquity, to devote the revenues
+of an entire city, which she owned, to the cause of Christ; and the
+approbation of Jerome, her friend, was a sufficient recompense.</p>
+
+<p>The vow of Chastity was equally a protest against one of the
+characteristic vices of the day, as well as a Christian virtue. Luxury
+and pleasure-seeking lives had relaxed the restraints of home and the
+virtues of earlier days. The evils of concubinage were shameless and
+open throughout the empire, which led to a low estimate of female virtue
+and degraded the sex. The pagan poets held up woman as a subject of
+scorn and scarcasm. On no subject were the apostles more urgent in their
+exhortations than to a life of purity. To no greater temptation were the
+converts to Christianity subjected than the looseness of prevailing
+sentiments in reference to this vice. It stared everybody in the face.
+Basil took especial care to guard the monks from this prevailing
+iniquity, and made chastity a transcendent and fundamental virtue. He
+aimed to remove the temptation to sin. The monks were enjoined to shun
+the very presence of women. If they carried the system of
+non-intercourse too far, and became hard and unsympathetic, it was to
+avoid the great scandal of the age,--a still greater evil. To the monk
+was denied even the blessing of the marriage ties. Celibacy became a
+fundamental law of monachism. It was not to cement a spiritual despotism
+that Basil forbade marriage, but to attain a greater sanctity,--for a
+monk was consecrated to what was supposed to be the higher life. This
+law of celibacy was abused, and gradually was extended to all the
+clergy, secular as well as regular, but not till the clergy were all
+subordinated to the rule of an absolute Pope. It is the fate of all
+human institutions to become corrupt; but no institution of the Church
+has been so fatally perverted as that pertaining to the marriage of the
+clergy. Founded to promote purity of personal life, it was used to
+uphold the arms of spiritual despotism. It was the policy of Hildebrand.</p>
+
+<p>The vow of Obedience, again, was made in special reference to the
+disintegration of society, when laws were feebly enforced and a central
+power was passing away. The discipline even of armies was relaxed. Mobs
+were the order of the day, even in imperial cities. Moreover, monks had
+long been insubordinate; they obeyed no head, except nominally; they
+were with difficulty ruled in their communities. Therefore obedience was
+made a cardinal virtue, as essential to the very existence of monastic
+institutions. I need not here allude to the perversion of this
+rule,--how it degenerated into a fearful despotism, and was made use of
+by ambitious popes, and finally by the generals of the Mendicant Friars
+and the Jesuits. All the rules of Basil were perverted from their
+original intention; but in his day they were called for.</p>
+
+<p>About a century later the monastic system went through another change or
+development, when Benedict, a remarkable organizer, instituted on Monte
+Cassino, near Naples, his celebrated monastery (529, A.D.), which became
+the model of all the monasteries of the West. He reaffirmed the rules of
+Basil, but with greater strictness. He gave no new principles to
+monastic life; but he adapted it to the climate and institutions of the
+newly founded Gothic kingdoms of Europe. It became less Oriental; it was
+made more practical; it was invested with new dignity. The most
+visionary and fanatical of all the institutions of the East was made
+useful. The monks became industrious. Industry was recognized as a
+prime necessity even for men who had retired from the world. No longer
+were the labors of monks confined to the weaving of baskets, but they
+were extended to the comforts of ordinary life,--to the erection of
+stately buildings, to useful arts, the systematic cultivation of the
+land, to the accumulation of wealth,--not for individuals, but for their
+monasteries. Monastic life became less dreamy, less visionary, but more
+useful, recognizing the bodily necessities of men. The religious duties
+of monks were still dreary, monotonous, and gloomy,--long and protracted
+singing in the choir, incessant vigils, an unnatural silence at the
+table, solitary walks in the cloister, the absence of social pleasures,
+confinement to the precincts of their convents; but their convents
+became bee-hives of industry, and their lands were highly cultivated.
+The monks were hospitable; they entertained strangers, and gave a
+shelter to the persecuted and miserable. Their monasteries became sacred
+retreats, which were respected by those rude warriors who crushed
+beneath their feet the glories of ancient civilization. Nor for several
+centuries did the monks in their sacred enclosures give especial
+scandal. Their lives were spent in labors of a useful kind, alternated
+and relieved by devotional duties.</p>
+
+<p>Hence they secured the respect and favor of princes and good men, who
+gave them lands and rich presents of gold and silver vessels. Their
+convents were unmolested and richly endowed, and these became enormously
+multiplied in every European country. Gradually they became so rich as
+to absorb the wealth of nations. Their abbots became great personages,
+being chosen from the ranks of princes and barons. The original poverty
+and social insignificance of monachism passed away, and the institution
+became the most powerful organization in Europe. It then aspired to
+political influence, and the lord abbots became the peers of princes and
+the ministers of kings. Their abbey churches, especially, became the
+wonder and the admiration of the age, both for size and magnificence.
+The abbey church of Cluny, in Burgundy, was five hundred and thirty feet
+long, and had stalls for two hundred monks. It had the appointment of
+one hundred and fifty parish priests. The church of Saint Albans, in
+England, is said to have been six hundred feet long; and that of
+Glastonbury, the oldest in England, five hundred and thirty.
+Peterborough's was over five hundred. The kings of England, both Saxon
+and Norman, were especial patrons of these religious houses. King Edgar
+founded forty-seven monasteries and richly endowed them; Henry I.
+founded one hundred and fifty; and Henry II. as many more. At one time
+there were seven hundred Benedictine abbeys in England, some of which
+were enormously rich,--like those of Westminster, St. Albans,
+Glastonbury, and Bury St. Edmunds,--and their abbots were men of the
+highest social and political distinction. They sat in Parliament as
+peers of the realm; they coined money, like feudal barons; they lived in
+great state and dignity. The abbot of Monte Cassino was duke and prince,
+and chancellor of the kingdom of the Two Sicilies. Tins celebrated
+convent had the patronage of four bishoprics, sixteen hundred and
+sixty-two churches, and possessed or controlled two hundred and fifty
+castles, four hundred and forty towns, and three hundred and thirty-six
+manors. Its revenues exceeded five hundred thousand ducats, so that the
+lord-abbot was the peer of the greatest secular princes. He was more
+powerful and wealthy, probably, than any archbishop in Europe. One of
+the abbots of St. Gall entered Strasburg with one thousand horsemen in
+his train. Whiting, of Glastonbury, entertained five hundred people of
+fashion at one time, and had three hundred domestic servants. &quot;My vow of
+poverty,&quot; said another of these lordly abbots,--who generally rode on
+mules with gilded bridles and with hawks on their wrists,--&quot;has given me
+ten thousand crowns a year; and my vow of obedience has raised me to the
+rank of a sovereign prince.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>Among the privileges of these abbots was exemption from taxes and tolls;
+they were judges in the courts; they had the execution of all rents, and
+the supreme control of the income of the abbey lands. The revenues of
+Westminster and Glastonbury were equal to half a million of dollars a
+year in our money, considering the relative value of gold and silver.
+Glastonbury owned about one thousand oxen, two hundred and fifty cows,
+and six thousand sheep. Fontaine abbey possessed forty thousand acres of
+land. The abbot of Augia, in Germany, had a revenue of sixty thousand
+crowns,--several millions, as money is now measured. At one time the
+monks, with the other clergy, owned half of the lands of Europe. If a
+king was to be ransomed, it was they who furnished the money; if costly
+gifts were to be given to the Pope, it was they who made them. The value
+of the vessels of gold and silver, the robes and copes of silk and
+velvet, the chalices, the altar-pieces, and the shrines enriched with
+jewels, was inestimable. The feasts which the abbots gave were almost
+regal. At the installation of the abbot of St. Augustine, at Canterbury,
+there were consumed fifty-eight tuns of beer, eleven tuns of wine,
+thirty-one oxen, three hundred pigs, two hundred sheep, one thousand
+geese, one thousand capons, six hundred rabbits, nine thousand eggs,
+while the guests numbered six thousand people. Of the various orders of
+the Benedictines there have been thirty-seven thousand monasteries and
+one hundred and fifty thousand abbots. From the monks, twenty-one
+thousand have been chosen as bishops and archbishops, and twenty-eight
+have been elevated to the papal throne.</p>
+
+<p>From these things, and others which may seem too trivial to mention, we
+infer the great wealth and power of monastic institutions, the most
+flourishing days of which were from the sixth century to the Crusades,
+beginning in the eleventh, when more than one hundred thousand monks
+acknowledged the rule of Saint Benedict. During this period of
+prosperity, when the vast abbey churches were built, and when abbots
+were great temporal as well as spiritual magnates, quite on an equality
+with the proudest feudal barons, we notice a marked decline in the
+virtues which had extorted the admiration of Europe. The Benedictines
+retained their original organization, they were bound by the same vows
+(as individuals, the monks were always poor), they wore the same dress,
+as they did centuries before, and they did not fail in their duties in
+the choir,--singing their mournful chants from two o'clock in the
+morning. But discipline was relaxed; the brothers strayed into unseemly
+places; they indulged in the pleasures of the table; they were sensual
+in their appearance; they were certainly ignorant, as a body; and they
+performed more singing than preaching or teaching. They lived for
+themselves rather than for the people. They however remained hospitable
+to the last. Their convents were hotels as well as bee-hives; any
+stranger could remain two nights at a convent without compensation and
+without being questioned. The brothers dined together at the refectory,
+according to the rules, on bread, vegetables, and a little meat;
+although it was noticed that they had a great variety in cooking eggs,
+which were turned and roasted and beaten up, and hardened and minced and
+fried and stuffed. It is said that subsequently they drank enormous
+quantities of beer and wine, and sometimes even to disgraceful excess.
+Their rules required them to keep silence at their meals; but their
+humanity got the better of them, and they have been censured for their
+hilarious and frivolous conversation,--for jests and stories and puns.
+Bernard accused the monks of degeneracy, of being given to the pleasures
+of the table, of loving the good things which they professed to
+scorn,--rare fish, game, and elaborate cookery.</p>
+
+<p>That the monks sadly degenerated in morals and discipline, and even
+became objects of scandal, is questioned by no respectable historian. No
+one was more bitter and vehement in his denunciations of this almost
+universal corruption of monastic life than Saint Bernard himself,--the
+impersonation of an ideal monk. Hence reforms were attempted; and the
+Cluniacs and Cistercians and other orders arose, modelled after the
+original institution on Monte Cassino. These were only branches of the
+Benedictines. Their vows and habits and duties were the same. It would
+seem that the prevailing vices of the Benedictines, in their decline,
+were those which were fostered by great wealth, and consequent idleness
+and luxury. But at their worst estate the monks, or regular clergy, were
+no worse than the secular clergy, or parish priests, in their ordinary
+lives, and were more intelligent,--at least more learned. The ignorance
+of the secular clergy was notorious and scandalous. They could not even
+write letters of common salutation; and what little knowledge they had
+was extolled and exaggerated. It was confined to the acquisition of the
+Psalter by heart, while a little grammar, writing, and accounts were
+regarded as extraordinary. He who could write a few homilies, drawn from
+the Fathers, was a wonder and a prodigy. There was a total absence of
+classical literature.</p>
+
+<p>But the monks, ignorant and degenerate as they were, guarded what little
+literature had escaped the ruin of the ancient civilization. They gave
+the only education the age afforded. There was usually a school attached
+to every convent, and manual labor was shortened in favor of students.
+Nor did the monks systematically and deliberately shut the door of
+knowledge against those inclined to study, for at that time there was no
+jealousy of learning; there was only indifference to it, or want of
+appreciation. The age was ignorant, and life was hard, and the struggle
+for existence occupied the thoughts of all. The time of the monks was
+consumed in alternate drudgeries and monotonous devotions. There was
+such a general intellectual torpor that scholars (and these were very
+few) were left at liberty to think and write as they pleased on the
+great questions of theology. There was such a general unanimity of
+belief, that the popes were not on the look-out for heresy. Nobody
+thought of attacking their throne. There was no jealousy about the
+reading of the Scriptures. Every convent had a small library, mostly
+composed of Lives of the saints, and of devout meditations and homilies;
+and the Bible was the greatest treasure of all,--the Vulgate of Saint
+Jerome, which was copied and illuminated by busy hands. In spite of the
+general ignorance, the monks relieved their dull lives by some attempts
+at art. This was the age of the most beautiful illuminated manuscripts.
+There was but little of doctrinal controversy, for the creed of the
+Church was settled; but pious meditations and the writings of noted
+saints were studied and accepted,--especially the works of Saint
+Augustine, who had fixed the thinking of the West for a thousand years.
+Pagan literature had but little charm until Aristotle was translated by
+Arabian scholars. The literature of the Church was puerile and
+extravagant, yet Christian,--consisting chiefly of legends of martyrs
+and Lives of saints. That literature has no charm to us, and can never
+be revived, indeed is already forgotten and neglected, as well it may
+be; but it gave unity to Christian belief, and enthroned the Christian
+heroes on the highest pedestal of human greatness. In the monasteries
+some one of the fraternity read aloud these Lives and Meditations, while
+the brothers worked or dined. There was no discussion, for all thought
+alike; and all sought to stimulate religious emotions rather than to
+quicken intellectual activity.</p>
+
+<p>About half the time of the monks, in a well-regulated monastery, was
+given to singing and devotional exercises and religious improvement, and
+the other half to labors in the fields, or in painting or musical
+composition. So far as we know, the monks lived in great harmony, and
+were obedient to the commands of their superiors. They had a common
+object to live for, and had few differences in opinion on any subject.
+They did not enjoy a high life, but it was free from distracting
+pleasures. They affected great humility, with which spiritual pride was
+mingled,--not the arrogant pride of the dialectician, but the
+self-satisfied pride of the devotee. There was no religious hatred,
+except towards Turks and Saracens. The monk, in his narrowness and
+ignorance, may be repulsive to an enlightened age: he was not repulsive
+to his own, for he was not behind it either in his ideas or in his
+habits of life. In fact, the more repulsive the monk of the dark ages
+is to this generation, the more venerated he was by bishops and barons
+seven hundred years ago; which fact leads us to infer that the
+degenerate monk might be to us most interesting when he was most
+condemned by the reformers of his day, since he was more humane, genial,
+and free than his brethren, chained to the rigid discipline of his
+convent. Even a Friar Tuck is not so repulsive to us as an unsocial,
+austere, narrow-minded, and ignorant fanatic of the eleventh century.</p>
+
+<p>But the monks were not to remain forever imprisoned in the castles of
+ignorance and despair. With the opening of the twelfth century light
+began to dawn upon the human mind. The intellectual monk, long
+accustomed to devout meditations, began to speculate on those subjects
+which had occupied his thoughts,--on God and His attributes, on the
+nature and penalty of sin, on redemption, on the Saviour, on the power
+of the will to resist evil, and other questions that had agitated the
+early Fathers of the Church. Then arose such men as Erigena, Roscelin,
+B&eacute;renger, Lanfranc, Anselm, Bernard, and others,--all more or less
+orthodox, but inquiring and intellectual. It was within the walls of the
+cloister that the awakening began and the first impulse was given to
+learning and philosophy. The abbey of Bec, in Normandy, was the most
+distinguished of new intellectual centres, while Clairvaux and other
+princely abbeys had inmates as distinguished for meditative habits as
+for luxury and pride.</p>
+
+<p>It was at this period, when the convents of Europe rejoiced in ample
+possessions, and their churches rivalled cathedrals in size and
+magnificence, and their abbots were lords and princes,--the palmy age of
+monastic institutions, chiefly of the Benedictine order,--that Saint
+Bernard, the greatest and best representative of Mediaeval monasticism,
+was born, 1091, at Fontaine, in Burgundy. He belonged to a noble family.
+His mother was as remarkable as Monica or Nonna. She had six sons and a
+daughter, whom she early consecrated to the Lord. Bernard was the third
+son. Like Luther, he was religiously inclined from early youth, and
+panted for monastic seclusion. At the age of twenty-three he entered the
+new monastery at Citeaux, which had been founded a few years before by
+Stephen Harding, an English saint, who revived the rule of Saint
+Benedict with still greater strictness, and was the founder of the
+Cistercian order,--a branch of the Benedictines. He entered this gloomy
+retreat, situated amid marshes and morasses, with no outward attractions
+like Cluny, but unhealthy and miserably poor,--the dreariest spot,
+perhaps, in Burgundy; and he entered at the head of thirty young men, of
+the noble class, among whom were four of his brothers who had been
+knights, and who presented themselves to the abbot as novices, bent on
+the severest austerities that human nature could support.</p>
+
+<p>Bernard himself was a beautiful, delicate, refined young man,--tall,
+with flaxen hair, fair complexion, blue eyes from which shone a
+superhuman simplicity and purity. His noble birth would have opened to
+him the highest dignities of the Church, but he sought only to bear the
+yoke of Christ, and to be nailed to the cross; and he really became a
+common laborer wrapped in a coarse cowl, digging ditches and planting
+fields,--for such were the labors of the monks of Citeaux when not
+performing their religious exercises. But his disposition was as
+beautiful as his person, and he soon won the admiration of his brother
+monks, as he had won the affection of the knights of Burgundy. Such was
+his physical weakness that &quot;nearly everything he took his stomach
+rejected;&quot; and such was the rigor of his austerities that he destroyed
+the power of appetite. He could scarcely distinguish oil from wine. He
+satisfied his hunger with the Bible, and quenched his thirst with
+prayer. In three years he became famous as a saint, and was made Abbot
+of Clairvaux,--a new Cistercian convent, in a retired valley which had
+been a nest of robbers.</p>
+
+<p>But his intellect was as remarkable as his piety, and his monastery
+became not only a model of monastic life, to which flocked men from all
+parts of Europe to study its rules, but the ascetic abbot himself became
+an oracle on all the questions of the day. So great was his influence
+that when he died, in 1153, he left behind one hundred and sixty
+monasteries formed after his model. He became the counsellor of kings
+and nobles, bishops and popes. He was summoned to attend councils and
+settle quarrels. His correspondence exceeded that of Jerome or Saint
+Augustine. He was sought for as bishop in the largest cities of France
+and Italy. He ruled Europe by the power of learning and sanctity. He
+entered into all the theological controversies of the day. He was the
+opponent of Ab&eacute;lard, whose condemnation he secured. He became a great
+theologian and statesman, as well as churchman. He incited the princes
+of Europe to a new crusade. His eloquence is said to have been
+marvellous; even the tones of his voice would melt to pity or excite to
+rage. With a long neck, like that of Cicero, and a trembling, emaciated
+frame, he preached with passionate intensity. Nobody could resist his
+eloquence. He could scarcely stand upright from weakness, yet he could
+address ten thousand men. He was an outspoken man, and reproved the
+greatest dignitaries with as much boldness as did Savonarola. He
+denounced the gluttony of monks, the avarice of popes, and the rapacity
+of princes. He held heresy in mortal hatred, like the Fathers of the
+fifth century. His hostility to Ab&eacute;lard was direful, since he looked
+upon him as undermining Christianity and extinguishing faith in the
+world. In his defence of orthodoxy he was the peer of Augustine or
+Athanasius. He absolutely abhorred the Mohammedans as the bitterest foes
+of Christendom,--the persecutors of pious pilgrims. He wandered over
+Europe preaching a crusade. He renounced the world, yet was compelled by
+the unanimous voice of his contemporaries to govern the world. He gave a
+new impulse to the order of Knights Templars. He was as warlike as he
+was humble. He would breathe the breath of intense hostility into the
+souls of crusaders, and then hasten back to the desolate and barren
+country in which Clairvaux was situated, rebuild his hut of leaves and
+boughs, and soothe his restless spirit with the study of the Song of
+Songs. Like his age, and like his institution, he was a great
+contradiction. The fiercest and most dogmatic of controversialists was
+the most gentle and loving of saints. His humanity was as marked as his
+fanaticism, and nothing could weaken it,--not even the rigors of his
+convent life. He wept at the sorrows of all who sought his sympathy or
+advice. On the occasion of his brother's death he endeavored to preach a
+sermon on the Canticles, but broke down as Jerome did at the funeral of
+Paula. He kept to the last the most vivid recollection of his mother;
+and every night, before he went to bed, he recited the seven Penitential
+Psalms for the benefit of her soul.</p>
+
+<p>In his sermons and exhortations Bernard dwelt equally on the wrath of
+God and the love of Christ. Said he to a runaway Cistercian, &quot;Thou
+fearest watchings, fasts, and manual labor, but these are light to one
+who thinks on eternal fire. The remembrance of the outer darkness takes
+away all horror from solitude. Place before thine eyes the everlasting
+weeping and gnashing of teeth, the fury of those flames which can never
+be extinguished&quot; (the essence of the theology of the Middle Ages,--the
+fear of Hell, of a physical and eternal Hell of bodily torments, by
+which fear those ages were controlled). Bernard, the loveliest
+impersonation of virtue which those ages saw, was not beyond their
+ideas. He impersonated them, and therefore led the age and became its
+greatest oracle. The passive virtues of the Sermon on the Mount were
+united with the fiercest passions of religious intolerance and the most
+repulsive views of divine vengeance. That is the soul of monasticism,
+even as reformed by Harding, Alberic, and Bernard in the twelfth
+century, less human than in the tenth century, yet more intellectual.</p>
+
+<p>The monks of Citeaux, of Morimond, of Pontigny, of Clairvaux, amid the
+wastes of a barren country, with their white habits and perpetual vigils
+and haircloth shirts and root dinners and hard labors in the field, were
+yet the counsellors and ministers of kings and the creators of popes,
+and incited the nations to the most bloody and unfortunate wars in the
+whole history of society,--I mean the Crusades. Some were great
+intellectual giants, yet all repelled scepticism as life repels death;
+all dwelt on the sufferings of the cross as a door through which the
+penitent and believing could surely enter heaven, yet based the justice
+of the infinite Father of Love on what, when it appeals to
+consciousness, seems to be the direst injustice. We cannot despise the
+Middle Ages, which produced such beatific and exalted saints, but we
+pity those dismal times when the great mass of the people had so little
+pleasure and comfort in this life, and such gloomy fears of the world to
+come; when life was made a perpetual sacrifice and abnegation of all the
+pleasures that are given us to enjoy,--to use and not to pervert. Hence
+monasticism was repulsive, even in its best ages, to enlightened reason,
+and fatal to all progress among nations, although it served a useful
+purpose when men were governed by fear alone, and when violence and
+strife and physical discomfort and ignorance and degrading superstitions
+covered the fairest portion of the earth with a funereal pall for more
+than a thousand years.</p>
+
+<p>The thirteenth century saw a new development of monastic institutions in
+the creation of the Mendicant Friars,--especially the Dominicans and
+Franciscans,--monks whose mission it was to wander over Europe as
+preachers, confessors, and teachers. The Benedictines were too numerous,
+wealthy, and corrupt to be reformed. They had become a scandal; they had
+lost the confidence of good men. There were needed more active partisans
+of the Pope to sustain his authority; the new universities required
+abler professors; the cities sought more popular preachers; the great
+desired more intelligent confessors. The Crusades had created a new
+field of enterprise, and had opened to the eye of Europe a wider horizon
+of knowledge. The universities which had grown up around the cathedral
+schools had kindled a spirit of inquiry. Church architecture had become
+lighter, more cheerful, and more symbolic. The Greek philosophy had
+revealed a new method. The doctrines of the Church, if they did not
+require a new system, yet needed, or were supposed to need, the aid of
+philosophy, for the questions which the schoolmen discussed were so
+subtile and intricate that only the logic of Aristotle could make
+them clear.</p>
+
+<p>Now the Mendicant orders entered with a zeal which has never been
+equalled, except by the Jesuits, into all the inquiries of the schools,
+and kindled a new religious life among the people, like the Methodists
+of the last century. They were somewhat similar to the Temperance
+reformers of the last fifty years. They were popular, zealous,
+intelligent, and religious. So great were their talents and virtues
+that they speedily spread over Europe, and occupied the principal
+pulpits and the most important chairs in the universities. Bonaventura,
+Albertus Magnus, Thomas Aquinas, and Duns Scotus were the great
+ornaments of these new orders. Their peculiarity--in contrast with the
+old orders--was, that they wandered from city to city and village to
+village at the command of their superiors. They had convents, like the
+other monks; but they professed absolute poverty, went barefooted, and
+submitted to increased rigors. Their vows were essentially those of the
+Benedictines. In less than a century, however, they too had degenerated,
+and were bitterly reproached for their vagabond habits and the violation
+of their vows. Their convents had also become rich, like those of the
+Benedictines. It was these friars whom Chaucer ridiculed, and against
+whose vices Wyclif declaimed. Yet they were retained by the popes for
+their services in behalf of ecclesiastical usurpation. It was they who
+were especially chosen to peddle indulgences. Their history is an
+impressive confirmation of the tendency of all human institutions to
+degenerate. It would seem that the mission of the Benedictines had been
+accomplished in the thirteenth century, and that of the Dominicans and
+Franciscans in the fourteenth.</p>
+
+<p>But monasticism, in any of its forms, ceased to have a salutary
+influence on society when the darkness of the Middle Ages was
+dispersed. It is peculiarly a Mediaeval institution. As a Mediaeval
+institution, it conferred many benefits on the semi-barbarians of
+Europe. As a whole, considering the shadows of ignorance and
+superstition which veiled Christendom, and the evils which violence
+produced, its influence was beneficent.</p>
+
+<p>Among the benefits which monastic institutions conferred, at least
+indirectly, may be mentioned the counteracting influence they exerted
+against the turbulence and tyranny of baronial lords, whose arrogance
+and extortion they rebuked; they befriended the peasantry; they enabled
+poor boys to rise; they defended the doctrine that the instructors of
+mankind should be taken from all classes alike; they were democratic in
+their sympathies, while feudal life produced haughtiness and scorn; they
+welcomed scholars from the humblest ranks; they beheld in peasants'
+children souls which could be ennobled. Though abbots were chosen
+generally from the upper classes, yet the ordinary monks sprang from the
+peasantry. For instance, a peasant's family is deprived of its head; he
+has been killed while fighting for a feudal lord. The family are doomed
+to misery and hardship. No aristocratic tears are shed for them; they
+are no better than dogs or cattle. The mother is heartbroken. Not one of
+her children can ordinarily rise from their abject position; they can
+live and breathe the common air, and that is all. They are unmolested
+in their mud huts, if they will toil for the owner of their village at
+the foot of the baronial castle. But one of her sons is bright and
+religious. He attracts the attention of a sympathetic monk, whose
+venerable retreat is shaded with trees, adorned with flowers, and seated
+perhaps on the side of a murmuring stream, whose banks have been made
+fertile by industry and beautiful with herds of cattle and flocks of
+sheep. He urges the afflicted mother to consecrate him to the service of
+the Church; and the boy enters the sanctuary and is educated according
+to the fashion of the age, growing up a sad, melancholy, austere, and
+pharisaical member of the fraternity, whose spirit is buried in a gloomy
+grave of ascetic severities, He passes from office to office. In time he
+becomes the prior of his convent,--possibly its abbot, the equal of that
+proud baron in whose service his father lost his life, the controller of
+innumerable acres, the minister of kings. How, outside the Church, could
+he thus have arisen? But in the monastery he is enabled, in the most
+aristocratic age of the world, to rise to the highest of worldly
+dignities. And he is a man of peace and not of war. He hates war; he
+seeks to quell dissensions and quarrels. He believes that there is a
+higher than the warrior's excellence. Monachism recognized what
+feudalism did not,--the claims of man as man. In this respect it was
+human and sympathetic. It furnished a retreat from misery and
+oppression. It favored contemplative habits and the passive virtues, so
+much needed in turbulent times. Whatever faults the monks had, it must
+be allowed that they alleviated sufferings, and presented the only
+consolation that their gloomy and iron age afforded. In an imperfect
+manner their convents answered the purpose of our modern hotels,
+hospitals, and schools. It was benevolence, charity, and piety which the
+monks aimed to secure, and which they often succeeded in diffusing among
+people more wretched and ignorant than themselves.</p>
+
+<p>AUTHORITIES.</p>
+
+<p>Saint Bernard's Works, especially the Epistles; Mabillon; H&eacute;lyot's
+Histoire des Ordres Monastiques; Dugdale's Monasticon; D&ouml;ring's
+Geschichte der Monchsorden; Montalembert's Les Moines d'Occident;
+Milman's Latin Christianity; Morison's Life and Times of Saint Bernard;
+Lives of the English Saints; Stephen Harding; Histoire d'Abbaye de
+Cluny, par M.P. Lorain; Neander's Church History; Butler's Lives of the
+Saints; Vaughan's Life of Thomas Aquinas; Digby's Ages of Faith.</p>
+
+
+<br><br><hr style="width: 35%;"><br><br>
+<h2><a name="SAINT_ANSELM."></a>SAINT ANSELM.</h2>
+
+<hr style="width: 25%;">
+
+<p>A. D. 1033-1109.</p>
+
+<p>MEDIAEVAL THEOLOGY.</p>
+
+<p>The Middle Ages produced no more interesting man than Anselm, Abbot of
+Bec and Archbishop of Canterbury,--not merely a great prelate, but a
+great theologian, resplendent in the virtues of monastic life and in
+devotion to the interests of the Church. He was one of the first to
+create an intellectual movement in Europe, and to stimulate theological
+inquiries.</p>
+
+<p>Anselm was born at Aosta, in Italy, 1033, and he died in 1109, at the
+age of 76. He was therefore the contemporary of Hildebrand, of Lanfranc,
+of B&eacute;renger, of Roscelin, of Henry IV. of Germany, of William the
+Conqueror, of the Countess Matilda, and of Urban II. He saw the first
+Crusade, the great quarrel about investitures and the establishment of
+the Normans in England. Aosta was on the confines of Lombardy and
+Burgundy, in a mountainous district, amid rich cornfields and fruitful
+vines and dark, waving chestnuts, in sight of lofty peaks with their
+everlasting snow. Anselm belonged to a noble but impoverished family;
+his father was violent and unthrifty, but his mother was religious and
+prudent. He was by nature a student, and early was destined to monastic
+life,--the only life favorable to the development of the intellect in a
+rude and turbulent age. I have already alluded to the general ignorance
+of the clergy in those times. There were no schools of any note at this
+period, and no convents where learning was cultivated beyond the
+rudiments of grammar and arithmetic and the writings of the Fathers. The
+monks could read and talk in Latin, of a barbarous sort,--which was the
+common language of the learned, so far as any in that age could be
+called learned.</p>
+
+<p>The most famous place in Europe, at that time, where learning was
+cultivated, was the newly-founded abbey of Bec in Normandy, under the
+superintendence of the Archbishop of Rouen, of which Lanfranc of Pavia
+was the prior. It was the first abbey in Normandy to open the door of
+learning to the young and inquiring minds of Western Europe. It was a
+Benedictine abbey, as severe in its rules as that of Clairvaux. It would
+seem that the fame of this convent, and of Lanfranc its presiding genius
+(afterwards the great Archbishop of Canterbury), reached the ears of
+Anselm; so that on the death of his parents he wandered over the Alps,
+through Burgundy, to this famous school, where the best teaching of the
+day was to be had. Lanfranc cordially welcomed his fellow-countryman,
+then at the age of twenty-six, to his retreat; and on his removal three
+years afterwards to the more princely abbey of St. Stephen in Caen,
+Anselm succeeded him as prior. Fifteen years later he became abbot, and
+ruled the abbey for fifteen years, during which time Lanfranc--the
+mutual friend of William the Conqueror and the great Hildebrand--became
+Archbishop of Canterbury.</p>
+
+<p>During this seclusion of thirty years in the abbey of Bec, Anselm gave
+himself up to theological and philosophical studies, and became known
+both as a profound and original thinker and a powerful supporter of
+ecclesiastical authority. The scholastic age,--that is, the age of
+dialectics, when theology invoked the aid of philosophy to establish the
+truths of Christianity,--had not yet begun; but Anselm may be regarded
+as a pioneer, the precursor of Thomas Aquinas, since he was led into
+important theological controversies to establish the creed of Saint
+Augustine. It was not till several centuries after his death, however,
+that his remarkable originality of genius was fully appreciated. He
+anticipated Descartes in his argument to prove the existence of God. He
+is generally regarded as the profoundest intellect among the early
+schoolmen, and the most original that appeared in the Church after
+Saint Augustine. He was not a popular preacher like Saint Bernard, but
+he taught theology with marvellous lucidity to the monks who sought the
+genial quiet of his convent. As an abbot he was cheerful and humane,
+almost to light-heartedness, frank and kind to everybody,--an exception
+to most of the abbots of his day, who were either austere and rigid, or
+convivial and worldly. He was a man whom everybody loved and trusted,
+yet one not unmindful of his duties as the supreme ruler of his abbey,
+enforcing discipline, while favoring relaxation. No monk ever led a life
+of higher meditation than he; absorbed not in a dreamy and visionary
+piety, but in intelligent inquiries as to the grounds of religious
+belief. He was a true scholar of the Platonic and Augustinian school;
+not a dialectician like Albertus Magnus and Ab&eacute;lard, but a man who went
+beyond words to things, and seized on realities rather than forms; not
+given to disputations and the sports of logical tournaments, but to
+solid inquiries after truth. The universities had not then arisen, but a
+hundred years later he would have been their ornament, like Thomas
+Aquinas and Bonaventura.</p>
+
+<p>Like other Norman abbeys, the abbey of Bec had after the Conquest
+received lands in England, and it became one of the duties of the abbot
+to look after its temporal interests. Hence Anselm was obliged to make
+frequent visits to England, where his friendship with Lanfranc was
+renewed, and where he made the acquaintance of distinguished prelates
+and abbots and churchmen, among others of Eadmer, his future biographer.
+It seems that he also won the hearts of the English nobility by his
+gentleness and affability, so that they rendered to him uncommon
+attentions, not only as a great ecclesiastic who had no equal in
+learning, but as a man whom they could not help loving.</p>
+
+<p>The life of Anselm very nearly corresponded with that of the Conqueror,
+who died in 1087, being five years older; and he was Abbot of Bec during
+the whole reign of William as King of England. There was nothing
+particularly memorable in his life as abbot aside from his theological
+studies. It was not until he was elevated to the See of Canterbury, on
+the death of Lanfranc, that his memorable career became historical. He
+anticipated Thomas Becket in his contest to secure the liberties of the
+Church against the encroachments of the Norman kings. The cause of the
+one was the cause of the other; only, Anselm was trained in monastic
+seclusion, and Becket amid the tumults and intrigues of a court. The one
+was essentially an ecclesiastic and theologian; the other a courtier and
+statesman. The former was religious, and the latter secular in his
+habits and duties. Yet both fought the same great battle, the essential
+principle of which was the object of contention between the popes and
+the emperors of Germany,--that pertaining to the right of investiture,
+which may be regarded, next to the Crusades, as the great outward event
+of the twelfth century. That memorable struggle for supremacy was not
+brought to a close until Innocent III made the kings of the earth his
+vassals, and reigned without a rival in Christendom. Gregory VII had
+fought heroically, but he died in exile, leaving to future popes the
+fruit of his transcendent labors.</p>
+
+<p>Lanfranc died in 1089,--the ablest churchman of the century next to the
+great Hildebrand, his master. It was through his influence that England
+was more closely allied with Rome, and that those fetters were imposed
+by the popes which the ablest of the Norman kings were unable to break.
+The Pope had sanctioned the atrocious conquest of England by the
+Normans--beneficially as it afterwards turned out--only on the
+condition that extraordinary powers should be conferred on the
+Archbishop of Canterbury, his representative in enforcing the papal
+claims, who thus became virtually independent of the king,--a spiritual
+monarch of such dignity that he was almost equal to his sovereign in
+authority. There was no such See in Germany and France as that of
+Canterbury. Its mighty and lordly metropolitan had the exclusive right
+of crowning the king. To him the Archbishop of York, once his equal,
+had succumbed. He was not merely primate, but had the supreme control of
+the Church in England. He could depose prelates and excommunicate the
+greatest personages; he enjoyed enormous revenues; he was vicegerent
+of the Pope.</p>
+
+<p>Loth was William to concede such great powers to the Pope, but he could
+not be King of England without making a king of Canterbury. So he made
+choice of Lanfranc--then Abbot of St. Stephen, the most princely of the
+Norman convents--for the highest ecclesiastical dignity in his realm,
+and perhaps in Europe after the papacy itself. Lanfranc was his friend,
+and also the friend of Hildebrand; and no collision took place between
+them, for neither could do without the other. William was willing to
+waive some of his prerogatives as a sovereign for such a kingdom as
+England, which made him the most powerful monarch in Western Europe,
+since he ruled the fairest part of France and the whole British realm,
+the united possession of both Saxons and Danes, with more absolute
+authority than any feudal sovereign at that time possessed. His
+victorious knights were virtually a standing army, bound to him with
+more than feudal loyalty, since he divided among them the lands of the
+conquered Saxons, and gave to their relatives the richest benefices of
+the Church. With the aid of an Italian prelate, bound in allegiance to
+the Pope, he hoped to cement his conquest. Lanfranc did as he
+wished,--removed the Saxon bishops, and gave their sees to Normans.
+Since Dunstan, no great Saxon bishop had arisen. The Saxon bishops were
+feeble and indolent, and were not capable of making an effective
+resistance. But Lanfranc was even more able than Dunstan,--a great
+statesman as well as prelate. He ruled England as grand justiciary in
+the absence of the monarch, and was thus viceregent of the kingdom. But
+while he despoiled the Saxon prelates, he would suffer no royal
+spoliation of the Norman bishops. He even wrested away from Odo,
+half-brother of the Conqueror, the manors he held as Count of Kent,
+which originally belonged to the See of Canterbury. Thus was William,
+with all his greed and ambition, kept in check by the spiritual monarch
+he had himself made so powerful.</p>
+
+<p>On the death of this great prelate, all eyes were turned to Anselm as
+his successor, who was then Abbot of Bec, absorbed in his studies. But
+William Rufus, who had in the mean time succeeded to the throne of the
+Conqueror, did not at once appoint any one to the vacant See, since he
+had seized and used its revenues to the scandal of the nation and the
+indignation of the Church. For five years there was no primate in
+England and no Archbishop of Canterbury. At last, what seemed to be a
+mortal sickness seized the King, and in the near prospect of death he
+summoned Anselm to his chamber and conferred upon him the exalted
+dignity,--which Anselm refused to accept, dreading the burdens of the
+office, and preferring the quiet life of a scholar in his Norman abbey.
+Like Thomas Aquinas, in the next century, who refused the archbishopric
+of Naples to pursue his philosophical studies in Paris, Anselm declined
+the primacy of the Church in England, with its cares and labors and
+responsibilities, that he might be unmolested in his theological
+inquiries. He understood the position in which he should be placed, and
+foresaw that he should be brought in collision with his sovereign if he
+would faithfully guard the liberties and interests of the Church. He was
+a man of peace and meditation, and hated conflict, turmoil, and active
+life. He knew that one of the requirements of a great prelate is to have
+business talents, more necessary perhaps than eloquence or learning. At
+last, however, on the pressing solicitation of the Pope, the King, and
+the clergy, he consented to mount the throne of Lanfranc, on condition
+that the temporalities, privileges, and powers of the See of Canterbury
+should not be attacked. The crafty and rapacious, but now penitent
+monarch, thinking he was about to die, and wishing to make his peace
+with Heaven, made all the concessions required; and the quiet monk and
+doctor, whom everybody loved and revered, was enthroned and consecrated
+as the spiritual monarch of England.</p>
+
+<p>Anselm's memorable career as bishop began in peace, but was soon clouded
+by a desperate quarrel with his sovereign, as he had anticipated. This
+learned and peace-loving theologian was forced into a contest which
+stands out in history like the warfare between Hildebrand and Henry IV.
+It was the beginning of that fierce contest in England which was made
+memorable by the martyrdom of Becket. Anselm, when consecrated, was
+sixty years of age,--a period of life when men are naturally timid,
+cautious, and averse to innovations, quarrels, and physical discomforts.</p>
+
+<p>The friendly relations between William Rufus and Anselm were disturbed
+when the former sought to exact large sums of money from his subjects to
+carry on war against his brother Robert. Among those who were expected
+to make heavy contributions, in the shape of presents, was the
+Archbishop of Canterbury, whose revenues were enormous,--perhaps the
+largest in the realm next to those of the King. Anselm offered as his
+contribution five hundred marks, what would now be equal to &pound;10,000,--a
+large sum in those days, but not as much as the Norman sovereign
+expected. In indignation he refused the present, which seemed to him
+meagre, especially since it was accompanied with words of seeming
+reproof; for Anselm had said that &quot;a free gift, which he meant this to
+be, was better than a forced and servile contribution.&quot; The King then
+angrily bade him begone; &quot;that he wanted neither his money nor his
+scolding.&quot; The courtiers tried to prevail on the prelate to double the
+amount of his present, and thus regain the royal favor; but he firmly
+refused to do this, since it looked to him like a corrupt bargain.
+Anselm, having distributed among the poor the money which the King had
+refused, left the court as soon as the Christmas festival was over and
+retired to his diocese, preserving his independence and dignity.</p>
+
+<p>A breach had not been made, but the irritation was followed by coolness;
+and this was increased when Anselm desired to have the religious posts
+filled the revenues of which the King had too long enjoyed, and when, in
+addition, he demanded a council of bishops to remedy the disorders and
+growing evils of the kingdom. This council the angry King refused with a
+sneer, saying, &quot;he would call the council when he himself pleased, not
+when Anselm pleased.&quot; As to the filling the vacancies of the abbeys, he
+further replied: &quot;What are abbeys to <i>you</i>? Are they not <i>mine</i>? Go and
+do what you like with your farms, and I will do what I please with my
+abbeys.&quot; So they parted, these two potentates, the King saying to his
+companions, &quot;I hated him yesterday; I hate him more to-day; and I shall
+hate him still more to-morrow. I refuse alike his blessings and his
+prayers.&quot; His chief desire now was to get rid of the man he had elevated
+to the throne of Canterbury. It may be observed that it was not the Pope
+who made this appointment, but the King of England. Yet, by the rules
+long established by the popes and accepted by Christendom, it was
+necessary that an archbishop, before he could fully exercise his
+spiritual powers, should go to Rome and receive at the hands of the Pope
+his <i>pallium</i>, or white woollen stole, as the badge of his office and
+dignity. Lanfranc had himself gone to Rome for this purpose,--and a
+journey from Canterbury to Rome in the eleventh century was no small
+undertaking, being expensive and fatiguing. But there were now at Rome
+two rival popes. Which one should Anselm recognize? France and Normandy
+acknowledged Urban. England was undecided whether it should be Urban or
+Clement. William would probably recognize the one that Anselm did not,
+for a rupture was certain, and the King sought for a pretext.</p>
+
+<p>So when the Archbishop asked leave of the King to go to Rome, according
+to custom, William demanded to know to which of these two popes he would
+apply for his pallium. &quot;To Pope Urban,&quot; was the reply. &quot;But,&quot; said the
+King, &quot;him I have not acknowledged; and no man in England may
+acknowledge a pope without my leave.&quot; At first view the matter was a
+small one comparatively, whether Urban was or was not the true pope.
+The real point was whether the King of England should accept as pope the
+man whom the Archbishop recognized, or whether the Archbishop should
+acknowledge him whom the King had accepted. This could be settled only
+by a grand council of the nation, to whom the matter should be
+submitted,--virtually a parliament. This council, demanded by Anselm,
+met in the royal castle of Rockingham, 1095, composed of nobles,
+bishops, and abbots. A large majority of the council were in the
+interests of the King, and the subject at issue was virtually whether
+the King or the prelate was supreme in spiritual matters,--a point which
+the Conqueror had ceded to Lanfranc and Hildebrand. This council
+insulted and worried the primate, and sought to frighten him into
+submission. But submission was to yield up the liberties of the Church.
+The intrepid prelate was not prepared for this, and he appealed from the
+council to the Pope, thereby putting himself in antagonism to the King
+and a majority of the peers of the realm. The King was exasperated, but
+foiled, while the council was perplexed. The Bishop of Durham saw no
+solution but in violence; but violence to the metropolitan was too bold
+a measure to be seriously entertained. The King hoped that Anselm would
+resign, as his situation was very unpleasant.</p>
+
+<p>But resignation would be an act of cowardice, and would result in the
+appointment of an archbishop favorable to the encroachments of the King,
+who doubtless aimed at the subversion of the liberties of the Church and
+greater independence. Five centuries later the sympathies of England
+would have been on his side. But the English nation felt differently in
+the eleventh century. All Christendom sympathized with the Pope; for
+this resistance of Anselm to the King was the cause of the popes
+themselves against the monarchs of Europe. Anselm simply acted as the
+vicegerent of the Pope. To submit to the dictation of the King in a
+spiritual matter was to undermine the authority of Rome. I do not
+attempt to settle the merits of the question, but only to describe the
+contest. To settle the merits of such a question is to settle the
+question whether the papal power in its plenitude was good or evil for
+society in the Middle Ages.</p>
+
+<p>One thing seems certain, that the King was thus far foiled by the
+firmness of a churchman,--the man who had passed the greater part of his
+life in a convent, studying and teaching theology; one of the mildest
+and meekest men ever elevated to high ecclesiastical office. Anselm was
+sustained by the power of conscience, by an imperative sense of duty, by
+allegiance to his spiritual head. He indeed owed fealty to the King, but
+only for the temporalities of his See. His paramount obligations as an
+archbishop were, according to all the ideas of his age, to the supreme
+pontiff of Christendom. Doubtless his life would have been easier and
+more pleasant had he been more submissive to the King. He could have
+brought all the bishops, as well as barons, to acknowledge the King's
+supremacy; but on his shoulders was laid the burden of sustaining
+ecclesiastical authority in England. He had anticipated this burden, and
+would have joyfully been exempted from its weight. But having assumed
+it, perhaps against his will, he had only one course to pursue,
+according to the ideas of the age; and this was to maintain the supreme
+authority of the Pope in England in all spiritual matters. It was
+remarkable that at this stage of the contest the barons took his side,
+and the bishops took the side of the King. The barons feared for their
+own privileges should the monarch be successful; for they knew his
+unscrupulous and tyrannical character,--that he would encroach on these
+and make himself as absolute as possible. The bishops were weak and
+worldly men, and either did not realize the gravity of the case or
+wished to gain the royal favor. They were nearly all Norman nobles, who
+had been under obligations to the crown.</p>
+
+<p>The King, however, understood and appreciated his position. He could not
+afford to quarrel with the Pope; he dared not do violence to the primate
+of the realm. So he dissembled his designs and restrained his wrath, and
+sought to gain by cunning what he could not openly effect by the
+exercise of royal power. He sent messengers and costly gifts to Rome,
+such as the needy and greedy servants of the servants of God rarely
+disdained. He sought to conciliate the Pope, and begged, as a favor,
+that the pallium should be sent to him as monarch, and given by him,
+with the papal sanction, to the Archbishop,--the name of Anselm being
+suppressed. This favor, being bought by potent arguments, was granted
+unwisely, and the pallium was sent to William with the greatest secrecy.
+In return, the King acknowledged the claims of Urban as pope. So Anselm
+did not go to Rome for the emblem of his power.</p>
+
+<p>The King, having succeeded thus far, then demanded of the Pope the
+deposition of Anselm. He could not himself depose the archbishop. He
+could elevate him, but not remove him; he could make, but not unmake.
+Only he who held the keys of Saint Peter, who was armed with spiritual
+omnipotence, could reverse his own decrees and rule arbitrarily. But for
+any king to expect that the Pope would part with the ablest defender of
+the liberties of the Church, and disgrace him for being faithful to
+papal interests, was absurd. The Pope may have used smooth words, but
+was firm in the uniform policy of all his predecessors.</p>
+
+<p>Meanwhile political troubles came so thick and heavy on the King, some
+of his powerful nobles being in open rebellion, that he felt it
+necessary to dissemble and defer the gratification of his vengeance on
+the man he hated more than any personage in England. He pretended to
+restore Anselm to favor. &quot;Bygones should be bygones.&quot; The King and the
+Archbishop sat at dinner at Windsor with friends and nobles, while an
+ironical courtier pleasantly quoted the Psalmist, &quot;Behold, how good and
+how pleasant it is for brethren to dwell together in unity!&quot;</p>
+
+<p>The King now supposed that Anselm would receive the pallium at his royal
+hands, which the prelate warily refused to accept. The subject was
+carefully dropped, but as the pallium was Saint Peter's gift, it was
+brought to Canterbury and placed upon the altar, and the Archbishop
+condescended, amid much pomp and ceremony, to take it thence and put it
+on,--a sort of puerile concession for the sake of peace. The King, too,
+wishing conciliation for the present, until he had gained the possession
+of Normandy from his brother Robert, who had embarked in the Crusades,
+and feeling that he could ill afford to quarrel with the highest
+dignitary of his kingdom until his political ambition was gratified,
+treated Anselm with affected kindness, until his ill success with the
+Celtic Welsh put him in a bad humor and led to renewed hostility. He
+complained that Anselm had not furnished his proper contingent of forces
+for the conquest of Wales, and summoned him to his court. In a secular
+matter like this, Anselm as a subject had no remedy. Refusal to appear
+would be regarded as treason and rebellion. Yet he neglected to obey the
+summons, perhaps fearing violence, and sought counsel from the Pope. He
+asked permission to go to Rome. The request was angrily refused. Again
+he renewed his request, and again it was denied him, with threats if he
+departed without leave. The barons, now against him, thought he had no
+right to leave his post; the bishops even urged him not to go. To all of
+whom he replied: &quot;You wish me to swear that I will not appeal to Saint
+Peter. To swear this is to forswear Saint Peter; to forswear Saint Peter
+is to forswear Christ.&quot; At last it seems that the King gave a reluctant
+consent, but with messages that were insulting; and Anselm, with a
+pilgrim's staff, took leave of his monks, for the chapter of Canterbury
+was composed of monks, set out for Dover, and reached the continent
+in safety.</p>
+
+<p>&quot;Thus began,&quot; says Church, &quot;the system of appeals to Rome, and of
+inviting foreign interference in the home affairs of England; and Anselm
+was the beginning of it.&quot; But however unfortunate it ultimately proved,
+it was in accordance with the ideas and customs of the Middle Ages,
+without which the papal power could not have been so successfully
+established. And I take the ground that the Papacy was an institution of
+which very much may be said in its favor in the dark ages of European
+society, especially in restraining the tyranny of kings and the
+turbulence of nobles. Governments are based on expediencies and changing
+circumstances, not on immutable principles or divine rights. If this be
+not true, we are driven to accept as the true form of government that
+which was recognized by Christ and his disciples. The feudal kings of
+Europe claimed a &quot;divine right,&quot; and professed to reign by the &quot;grace of
+God.&quot; Whence was this right derived? If it can be substantiated, on what
+claim rests the sovereignty of the people? Are not popes and kings and
+bishops alike the creation of circumstances, good or evil inventions, as
+they meet the wants of society?</p>
+
+<p>Anselm felt himself to be the subject of the Pope as well as of the
+King, but that, as a priest, his supreme allegiance should be given to
+the Pope, as the spiritual head of the Church and vicegerent of Christ
+upon the earth. We differ from him in his view of the claims of the
+Pope, which he regarded as based on immutable truth and the fiat of
+Almighty power,--even as Richelieu looked upon the imbecile king whom he
+served as reigning by divine right. The Protestant Reformation
+demolished the claims of the spiritual potentate, as the French
+Revolution swept away the claims of the temporal monarch. The &quot;logic of
+events&quot; is the only logic which substantiates the claims of rulers; and
+this logic means, in our day, constitutional government in politics and
+private judgment in religion,--the free choice of such public servants,
+whatever their titles of honor, in State and Church, as the exigencies
+and circumstances of society require. The haughtiest of the popes, in
+the proudest period of their absolute ascendancy, never rejected their
+early title,--&quot;servant of the servants of God.&quot; Wherever there is real
+liberty among the people, whose sovereignty is acknowledged as the
+source of power, the ruler <i>is</i> a servant of the people and not their
+tyrant, however great the authority which they delegate to him, which
+they alone may continue or take away. Absolute authority, delegated to
+kings or popes by God, was the belief of the Middle Ages; limited
+authority, delegated to rulers by the people, is the idea of our times.
+What the next invention in government may be no one can tell; but
+whatever it be, it will be in accordance with the ideas and altered
+circumstances of progressive ages. No one can anticipate or foresee the
+revolutions in human thought, and therefore in human governments, &quot;till
+He shall come whose right it is to reign.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>Taking it, then, to be the established idea of the Middle Ages that all
+ecclesiastics owed supreme allegiance to the visible head of the Church,
+no one can blame Anselm for siding with the Pope, rather than with his
+sovereign, in spiritual matters. He would have been disloyal to his
+conscience if he had not been true to his clerical vows of obedience.
+Conscience may be unenlightened, yet take away the power of conscience
+and what would become of our world? What is a man without a conscience?
+He is a usurper, a tyrant, a libertine, a spendthrift, a robber, a
+miser, an idler, a trifler,--whatever he is tempted to be; a supreme
+egotist, who says in his heart, &quot;There is no God.&quot; The Almighty Creator
+placed this instinct in the soul of man to prevent the total eclipse of
+faith, and to preserve some allegiance to Him, some guidance in the
+trials and temptations of life. We lament a perverted conscience; yet
+better this than no conscience at all, a voice silenced by the combined
+forces of evil. A man <i>must</i> obey this voice. It is the wisdom of the
+ages to make it harmonious with eternal right; it is the power of God to
+remove or weaken the assailing forces which pervert or silence it.</p>
+
+<p>See, then, this gentle, lovable, and meditative scholar--not haughty
+like Dunstan, not arrogant like Becket, not sacerdotal like Ambrose, not
+passionate like Chrysostom, but meek as Moses is said to have been
+before Pharaoh (although I never could see this distinguishing trait in
+the Hebrew leader)--yet firmly and heroically braving the wrath of the
+sovereign who had elevated him, and pursuing his toilsome journey to
+Rome to appeal to justice against injustice, to law against violence.
+He reached the old capital of the world in midwinter, after having spent
+Christmas in that hospitable convent where Hildebrand had reigned, and
+which was to shield the persecuted Ab&eacute;lard from the wrath of his
+ecclesiastical tormentors. He was most honorably received by the Pope,
+and lodged in the Lateran, as the great champion of papal authority.
+Vainly did he beseech the Pope to relieve him from his dignities and
+burdens; for such a man could not be spared from the exalted post in
+which he had been placed. Peace-loving as he was, his destiny was to
+fight battles.</p>
+
+<p>In the following year Pope Urban died; and in the following year William
+Rufus himself was accidentally killed in the New Forest. His death was
+not much lamented, he having proved hard, unscrupulous, cunning, and
+tyrannical. At this period the kings of England reigned with almost
+despotic power, independent of barons and oppressive to the people.
+William had but little regard for the interests of the kingdom. He built
+neither churches nor convents, but Westminster Hall was the memorial of
+his iron reign.</p>
+
+<p>Much was expected of Henry I., who immediately recalled Anselm from
+Lyons, where he was living in voluntary exile. He returned to
+Canterbury, with the firm intention of reforming the morals of the
+clergy and resisting royal encroachments. Henry was equally resolved on
+making bishops as well as nobles subservient to him. Of course harmony
+and concord could not long exist between such men, with such opposite
+views. Even at the first interview of the King with the Archbishop at
+Salisbury, he demanded a renewal of homage by a new act of investiture,
+which was virtually a continuance of the quarrel. It was, however,
+mutually agreed that the matter should be referred to the new pope.
+Anselm, on his part, knew that the appeal was hopeless; while the King
+wished to gain time. It was not long before the answer of Pope Pascal
+came. He was willing that Henry should have many favors, but not this.
+Only the head of the Church could bestow the emblems of spiritual
+authority. On receiving the papal reply the King summoned his nobles and
+bishops to his court, and required that Anselm should acknowledge the
+right of the King to invest prelates with the badges of spiritual
+authority. The result was a second embassy to the Pope, of more
+distinguished persons,--the Archbishop of York and two other prelates.
+The Pope, of course, remained inflexible. On the return of the envoys a
+great council was assembled in London, and Anselm again was required to
+submit to the King's will. It seems that the Pope, from motives of
+policy (for all the popes were reluctant to quarrel with princes), had
+given the envoys assurance that, so long as Henry was a good king, he
+should not be disturbed, and that oral declarations were contrary to his
+written documents.</p>
+
+<p>This contradiction and double dealing required a new embassy to Rome;
+but in the mean time the King gave the See of Salisbury to his
+chancellor, and that of Hereford to the superintendent of his larder.
+When the answer of the Pope was finally received, it was found that he
+indignantly disavowed the verbal message, and excommunicated the three
+prelates as liars. But the King was not disconcerted. He suddenly
+appeared at Canterbury, and told Anselm that further opposition would be
+followed by the royal enmity; yet, mollifying his wrath, requested
+Anselm himself to go to Rome and do what he could with the Pope. Anselm
+assured him that he could do nothing to the prejudice of the Church. He
+departed, however, the King obviously wishing him out of the way.</p>
+
+<p>The second journey of Anselm to Rome was a perpetual ovation, but was of
+course barren of results. The Pope remained inflexible, and Anselm
+prepared to return to England; but, from the friendly hints of the
+prelates who accompanied him, he sojourned again at Lyons with his
+friend the archbishop. Both the Pope and the King had compromised;
+Anselm alone was straightforward and fearless. As a consequence his
+revenues were seized, and he remained in exile. He had been willing to
+do the Pope's bidding, had he made an exception to the canons; but so
+long as the law remained in force he had nothing to do but conform to
+it. He remained in Lyons a year and a half, while Henry continued his
+negotiations with Pascal; but finding that nothing was accomplished,
+Anselm resolved to excommunicate his sovereign. The report of this
+intention alarmed Henry, then preparing for a decisive conflict with his
+brother Robert. The excommunication would at least be inconvenient; it
+might cost him his crown. So he sought an interview with Anselm at the
+castle of l'Aigle, and became outwardly reconciled, and restored to him
+his revenues.</p>
+
+<p>&quot;The end of the dreary contest came at last, in 1107, after vexatious
+delays and intrigues.&quot; It was settled by compromise,--as most quarrels
+are settled, as most institutions are established. Outwardly the King
+yielded. He agreed, in an assembly of nobles, bishops, and abbots at
+London, that henceforth no one should be invested with bishopric or
+abbacy, either by king or layman, by the customary badges of ring and
+crosier. Anselm, on his part, agreed that no prelate should be refused
+consecration who was nominated by the King. The appointment of bishops
+remained with the King; but the consecration could be withheld by the
+primate, since he alone had the right to give the badges of office,
+without which spiritual functions could not be lawfully performed. It
+was a moral victory to the Church, but the victory of an unpopular
+cause. It cemented the power of the Pope, while freedom from papal
+interference has ever been dear to the English nation.</p>
+
+<p>When Anselm had fought this great fight he died, 1109, in the sixteenth
+year of his reign as primate of the Church in England, and was buried,
+next to Lanfranc, in his abbey church. His career outwardly is memorable
+only for this contest, which was afterwards renewed by Thomas Becket
+with a greater king than either William Rufus or Henry I. It is
+interesting, since it was a part of the great struggle between the
+spiritual and temporal powers for two hundred years,--from Hildebrand to
+Innocent III. This was only one of the phases of the quarrel,--one of
+the battles of a long war,--not between popes and emperors, as in
+Germany and Italy, but between a king and the vicegerent of a pope; a
+king and his subject, the one armed with secular, the other with
+spiritual, weapons. It was only brought to an end by an appeal to the
+fears of men,--the dread of excommunication and consequent torments in
+hell, which was the great governing idea of the Middle Ages, the means
+by which the clergy controlled the laity. Abused and perverted as this
+idea was, it indicates and presupposes a general belief in the
+personality of God, in rewards and punishments in a future state, and
+the necessity of conforming to the divine laws as expounded and
+enforced by the Christian Church. Hence the dark ages have been called
+&quot;Ages of Faith.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>It now remains to us to contemplate Anselm as a theologian and
+philosopher,--a more interesting view, for in this aspect his character
+is more genial, and his influence more extended and permanent. He is one
+of the first who revived theological studies in Europe. He did not teach
+in the universities as a scholastic doctor, but he was one who prepared
+the way for universities by the stimulus he gave to philosophy. It was
+in his abbey of Bec that he laid the foundation of a new school of
+theological inquiry. In original genius he was surpassed by no
+scholastic in the Middle Ages, although both Ab&eacute;lard and Thomas Aquinas
+enjoyed a greater fame. It was for his learning and sanctity that he was
+canonized,--and singularly enough by Alexander VI., the worst pope who
+ever reigned. Still more singular is it that the last of his successors,
+as abbot of Bec, was the diplomatist Talleyrand,--one of the most
+worldly and secular of all the ecclesiastical dignitaries of an
+infidel age.</p>
+
+<p>The theology of the Middle Ages, of which Anselm was one of the greatest
+expounders, certainly the most profound, was that which was systematized
+by Saint Augustine from the writings of Paul. Augustine was the oracle
+of the Latin Church until the Council of Trent, and nominally his
+authority has never been repudiated by the Catholic Church. But he was
+no more the father of the Catholic theology than he was of the
+Protestant, as taught by John Calvin: these two great theologians were
+in harmony in all essential doctrines as completely as were Augustine
+and Anselm, or Augustine and Thomas Aquinas. The doctrines of theology,
+as formulated by Augustine, were subjects of contemplation and study in
+all the convents of the Middle Ages. In spite of the prevailing
+ignorance, it was impossible that inquiring men, &quot;secluded in gloomy
+monasteries, should find food for their minds in the dreary and
+monotonous duties to which monks were doomed,--a life devoted to
+alternate manual labor and mechanical religious services.&quot; There would
+be some of them who would speculate on the lofty subjects which were the
+constant themes of their meditations. Bishops were absorbed in their
+practical duties as executive rulers. Village priests were too ignorant
+to do much beyond looking after the wants of hinds and peasants. The
+only scholarly men were the monks. And although the number of these was
+small, they have the honor of creating the first intellectual movement
+since the fall of the Roman Empire. They alone combined leisure with
+brain-work. These intellectual and inquiring monks, as far back as the
+ninth century speculated on the great subjects of Christian faith with
+singular boldness, considering the general ignorance which veiled
+Europe in melancholy darkness. Some of them were logically led &quot;to a
+secret mutiny and insurrection&quot; against the doctrines which were
+universally received. This insurrection of human intelligence gave great
+alarm to the orthodox leaders of the Church; and to suppress it the
+Church raised up conservative dialecticians as acute and able as those
+who strove for emancipation. At first they used the weapons of natural
+reason, but afterwards employed the logic and method of Aristotle, as
+translated into Latin from the Arabic, to assist them in their
+intellectual combats. Gradually the movement centred in the scholastic
+philosophy, as a bulwark to Catholic theology. But this was nearly a
+hundred years after the time of Anselm, who himself was not enslaved by
+the technicalities of a complicated system of dialectics.</p>
+
+<p>Naturally the first subject which was suggested to the minds of
+inquiring monks was the being and attributes of God. He was the
+beginning and end of their meditations. It was to meditate upon God that
+the Oriental recluse sought the deserts of Asia Minor and Egypt. Like
+the Eastern monk of the fourth century, he sought to know the essence
+and nature of the Deity he worshipped. There arose before his mind the
+great doctrines of the trinity, the incarnation, and redemption. Closely
+connected with these were predestination and grace, and then &quot;fixed
+fate, free-will, foreknowledge absolute.&quot; On these mysteries he could
+not help meditating; and with meditation came speculation on
+unfathomable subjects pertaining to God and his relations with man, to
+the nature of sin and its penalty, to the freedom of the will, and
+eternal decrees.</p>
+
+<p>The monk became first a theologian and then a philosopher, whether of
+the school of Plato or of Aristotle he did not know. He began to
+speculate on questions which had agitated the Grecian schools,--the
+origin of evil and of matter; whether the world was created or
+uncreated; whether there is a distinction between things visible and
+invisible; whether we derive our knowledge from sensation or reflection;
+whether the soul is necessarily immortal; how free-will is to be
+reconciled with God's eternal decrees, or what the Greeks called Fate;
+whether ideas are eternal, or are the creation of our own minds. These,
+and other more subtile questions--like the nature of angels--began to
+agitate the convent in the ninth century.</p>
+
+<p>It was then that the monk Gottschalk revived the question of
+predestination, which had slumbered since the time of Saint Augustine.
+Although the Bishop of Hippo was the oracle of the Church, and no one
+disputed his authority, it would seem that his characteristic
+doctrine,--that of grace; the essential doctrine of Luther also,--was
+never a favorite one with the great churchmen of the Middle Ages. They
+did not dispute Saint Augustine, but they adhered to penances and
+expiations, which entered so largely into the piety of the Middle Ages.
+The idea of penances and expiations, pushed to their utmost logical
+sequence, was salvation by works and not by faith. Grace, as understood
+by the Fathers, was closely allied to predestination; it disdained the
+elaborate and cumbrous machinery of ecclesiastical discipline, on which
+the power of the clergy was based. Grace was opposed to penance, while
+penance was the form which religion took; and as predestination was a
+theological sequence of grace, it was distasteful to the Mediaeval
+Church. Both grace and predestination tended to undermine the system of
+penance then universally accepted. The great churchmen of the Middle
+Ages were plainly at war with their great oracle in this matter, without
+being fully aware of their real antagonism. So they made an onslaught on
+Gottschalk, as opposed to those ideas on which sacerdotal power
+rested,--especially did Hincmar, Archbishop of Rheims, the greatest
+prelate of that age. Persecuted, Gottschalk appealed to reason rather
+than authority, thus anticipating Luther by five hundred years,--an
+immense heresy in the Middle Ages. Hincmar, not being able to grapple
+with the monk in argument, summoned to his aid the brightest intellect
+of that century,--the first man who really gave an impulse to
+philosophical inquiries in the Middle Ages, the true founder of
+scholasticism.</p>
+
+<p>This man was John Scotus Erigena,--or John the Erin-born,--who was also
+a monk, and whose early days had been spent in some secluded monastery
+in Ireland, or the Scottish islands. Somehow he attracted the attention
+of Charles the Bald, A.D. 843, and became his guest and chosen
+companion. And yet, while he lived in the court, he spent the most of
+his time in intellectual seclusion. As a guest of the king he may have
+become acquainted with Hincmar, or his acquaintance with Hincmar may
+have led to his friendship with Charles. He was witty, bright, and
+learned, like Ab&eacute;lard, a favorite with the great. In his treatise on
+Predestination, in which he combated the views of Gotschalk, he probably
+went further than Hincmar desired or expected: he boldly asserted the
+supremacy of reason, and threw off the shackles of authority. He
+combated Saint Augustine as well as Gottschalk. He even aspired to
+reconcile free-will with the divine sovereignty,--the great mistake of
+theologians in every age, the most hopeless and the most ambitious
+effort of human genius,--a problem which cannot be solved. He went even
+further than this: he attempted to harmonize philosophy with religion,
+as Ab&eacute;lard did afterwards. He brought all theological questions to the
+test of dialectical reasoning. Thus the ninth century saw a rationalist
+and a pantheist at the court of a Christian king. Like Democritus, he
+maintained the eternity of matter. Like a Buddhist, he believed that God
+is all things and all things are God. Such doctrines were not to be
+tolerated, even in an age when theological speculations did not usually
+provoke persecution. Religious persecution for opinions was the fruit of
+subsequent inquiries, and did not reach its height until the Dominicans
+arose in the thirteenth century. But Erigena was generally denounced; he
+fell under the censure of the Pope, and was obliged to fly, taking
+refuge about the year 882 in England,--it is said at Oxford, where there
+was probably a cathedral school, but not as yet a university, with its
+professors' chairs and scholastic honors. Others suppose that he died in
+Paris, 891.</p>
+
+<p>A spirit of inquiry having been thus awakened among a few intellectual
+monks, they began to speculate about those questions which had agitated
+the Grecian schools: whether <i>genera</i> and <i>species</i>--called
+&quot;universals,&quot; or ideas--have a substantial and independent existence, or
+whether they are the creation of our own minds; whether, if they have a
+real existence, they are material or immaterial essences; whether they
+exist apart from objects perceptible by the senses. It is singular that
+such questions should have been discussed in the ninth century, since
+neither Plato nor Aristotle were studied. That age was totally ignorant
+of Greek. It may be doubted whether there was a Greek scholar in Western
+Europe,--or even in Rome.</p>
+
+<p>No very remarkable man arose with a rationalizing spirit, after Erigena,
+until Berengar of Tours in the eleventh century, who maintained that in
+the Sacrament the presence of the body of Christ involves no change in
+the nature and essence of the bread and wine. He was opposed by
+Lanfranc. But the doctrine of transubstantiation was too deeply grounded
+in the faith of Christendom to be easily shaken. Controversies seemed to
+centre around the doctrine of the real existence of ideas,--what are
+called &quot;universals,&quot;--which doctrine was generally accepted. The monks,
+in this matter, followed Saint Augustine, who was a realist, as were
+also the orthodox leaders of the Church generally from his time to that
+of Saint Bernard. It was a sequence of the belief in the doctrine of
+the Trinity.</p>
+
+<p>No one of mark opposed the Realism which had now become one of the
+accepted philosophical opinions of the age, until Roscelin, in the
+latter part of the eleventh century, denied that universals have a real
+existence. It was Plato's doctrine that universals have an independent
+existence apart from individual objects, and that they exist before the
+latter (<i>universalia</i> ANTE <i>rem</i>,--the thought <i>before</i> the thing);
+while Aristotle maintained that universals, though possessing a real
+existence, exist only in individual objects (<i>universalia</i> IN <i>re</i>,
+--the thought <i>in</i> the thing). Nominalism is the doctrine that
+individuals only have real existence (<i>universalia</i> POST <i>rem</i>,--the
+thought <i>after</i> the thing).</p>
+
+<p>It is not probable that this profound question about universals would
+have excited much interest among the intellectual monks of the eleventh
+century, had it not been applied to theological subjects, in which
+chiefly they were absorbed. Now Roscelin advanced the doctrine, that, if
+the three persons in the Trinity were one thing, it would follow that
+the Father and the Holy Ghost must have entered into the flesh together
+with the Son; and as he believed that only individuals exist in reality,
+it would follow that the three persons of the Godhead are three
+substances, in fact three Gods. Thus Nominalism logically led to an
+assault on the received doctrine of the Trinity--the central point in
+the theology of the Church. This was heresy. The foundations of
+Christian belief were attacked, and no one in that age was strong enough
+to come to the rescue but Anselm, then Abbot of Bec.</p>
+
+<p>His great service to the cause of Christian theology, and therefore to
+the Church universal, was his exposition of the logical results of the
+Nominalism of Roscelin,--to whom universals, or ideas, were merely
+creations of the mind, or conventional phrases, having no real
+existence. Hence such things as love, friendship, beauty, justice, were
+only conceptions. Plato and Augustine maintained that they are eternal
+verities, not to be explained by definitions, appealing to
+consciousness, in the firm belief in which the soul sustains itself;
+that there can be no certain knowledge without a recognition of these;
+that from these only sound deductions of moral truth can be drawn; that
+without a firm belief in these eternal certitudes there can be no repose
+and no lofty faith. These ideas are independent of us. They do not vary
+with our changing sensations; they have nothing to do with sensation.
+They are not creations of the brain; they inherently exist, from all
+eternity. The substance of these ideas is God; without these we could
+not conceive of God. Augustine especially, in the true spirit of
+Platonism, abhorred doctrines which made the existence of God depend
+upon our own abstractions. To him there was a reality in love, in
+friendship, in justice, in beauty; and he repelled scepticism as to
+their eternal existence, as life repels death.</p>
+
+<p>Roscelin took away the platform from whose lofty heights Socrates and
+Plato would survey the universe. He attacked the citadel in which
+Augustine intrenched himself amid the desolations of a dissolving world;
+he laid the axe at the root of the tree which sheltered all those who
+would fly from uncertainty and despair.</p>
+
+<p>But if these ideas were not true, what was true; on what were the hopes
+of the world to be based; where was consolation for the miseries of life
+to be found? &quot;There are many goods,&quot; says Anselm, &quot;which we
+desire,--some for utility, and others for beauty; but all these goods
+are relative,--more or less good,--and imply something absolutely good.
+This absolute good--the <i>summum bonum</i>--is God. In like manner all that
+is great and high are only relatively great and high; and hence there
+must be something absolutely great and high, and this is God. There must
+exist at least one being than which no other is higher; hence there must
+be but one such being,--and this is God.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>It was thus that Anselm brought philosophy to the support of theology.
+He would combat the philosophical reasonings of Roscelin with still
+keener dialectics. He would conquer him on his own ground and with his
+own weapons.</p>
+
+<p>Let it not be supposed that this controversy about universals was a mere
+dialectical tournament, with no grand results. It goes down to the root
+of almost every great subject in philosophy and religion. The denial of
+universal ideas is rationalism and materialism in philosophy, as it is
+Pelagianism and Arminianism in theology. The Nominalism of Roscelin
+reappeared in the Rationalism of Ab&eacute;lard; and, carried out to its
+severe logical sequences, is the refusal to accept any doctrine which
+cannot be proved by reason. Hence nothing is to be accepted which is
+beyond the province of reason to explain; and hence nothing is to be
+received by faith alone. Christianity, in the hands of fearless and
+logical nominalists, would melt away,--that is, what is peculiar in its
+mysterious dogmas. Its mysterious dogmas were the anchors of belief in
+ages of faith. It was these which animated the existence of such men as
+Augustine, Bernard, Anselm, and Thomas Aquinas. Hence their terrible
+antagonism even to philosophical doctrines which conflicted with the
+orthodox belief, on which, as they thought, the salvation of
+mankind rested.</p>
+
+<p>But Anselm did not rest with combating the Nominalism of Roscelin. In
+the course of his inquiries and arguments he felt it necessary to
+establish the belief in God--the one great thing from which all other
+questions radiated--by a new argument, and on firmer ground than that on
+which it had hitherto rested. He was profoundly devotional as well as
+logical, and original as he was learned. Beyond all the monks of his age
+he lived in the contemplation of God. God was to him the essence of all
+good, the end of all inquiries, the joy and repose of his soul He could
+not understand unless he <i>first</i> believed; knowledge was the <i>fruit</i> of
+faith, not its <i>cause</i>. The idea of God in the mind of man is the
+highest proof of the existence of God. That only is real which appeals
+to consciousness. He did not care to reason about a thing when reasoning
+would not strengthen his convictions, perhaps involve him in doubts and
+perplexities. Reason is finite and clouded and warped. But that which
+directly appeals to consciousness (as all that is eternal must appeal),
+and to that alone, like beauty and justice and love,--ultimate ideas to
+which reasoning and definitions add nothing,--is to be received as a
+final certitude. Hence, absolute certainty of the existence of God, as
+it appeals to consciousness,--like the &quot;<i>Cogito, ergo sum</i>.&quot; In this
+argument he anticipated Descartes, and proved himself the profoundest
+thinker of his century, perhaps of five centuries.</p>
+
+<p>The deductions which Anselm made from the attributes of God and his
+moral government seem to have strengthened the belief of the Middle Ages
+in some theological aspects which are repulsive to consciousness,--his
+stronghold; thereby showing how one-sided any deductions are apt to be
+when pushed out to their utmost logical consequences; how they may even
+become a rebuke to human reason in those grand efforts of which reason
+is most proud, for theology, it must be borne in mind, is a science of
+deductions from acknowledged truths of revelation. Hence, from the
+imperfections of reason, or from disregard of other established truths,
+deductions may be pushed to absurdity even when logical, and may be made
+to conflict with the obvious meaning of primal truths from which these
+deductions are made, or at least with those intuitions which are hard to
+be distinguished from consciousness itself. There may be no flaw in the
+argument, but the argument may land one in absurdity and contradiction.
+For instance, from the acknowledged sinfulness of human nature--one of
+the cardinal declarations of Scripture, and confirmed by universal
+experience--and the equally fundamental truth that God is infinite,
+Anselm assumed the dogma that the guilt of men as sinners against an
+infinite God is infinitely great. From this premise, which few in his
+age were disposed to deny, for it was in accordance with Saint
+Augustine, it follows that infinite sin, according to eternal justice,
+could only be atoned for by an infinite punishment. Hence all men
+deserve eternal punishment, and must receive it, unless there be made an
+infinite satisfaction or atonement, since not otherwise can divine love
+be harmonized with divine justice. Hence it was necessary that the
+eternal Son should become man, and make, by his voluntary death on the
+cross, the necessary atonement for human sins. Pushed out to the
+severest logical consequences, it would follow, that, as an infinite
+satisfaction has atoned for sin, <i>all</i> sinners are pardoned. But the
+Church shrank from such a conclusion, although logical, and included in
+the benefits of the atonement only the <i>believing</i> portion of mankind.
+The discrepancy between the logical deductions and consciousness, and I
+may add Scripture, lies in assuming that human guilt <i>is infinitely</i>
+great. It is thus that theology became complicated, even gloomy, and in
+some points false, by metaphysical reasonings, which had such a charm
+both to the Fathers and the Schoolmen. The attempt to reconcile divine
+justice with divine love by metaphysics and abstruse reasoning proved as
+futile as the attempt to reconcile free-will with predestination; for
+divine justice was made by deduction, without reference to other
+attributes, to conflict with those ideas of justice which consciousness
+attests,--even as a fettered will, of which all are conscious (that is,
+a will fettered by sin), was pushed out by logical deductions into
+absolute slavery and impotence.</p>
+
+<p>Anselm did not carry out metaphysical reasonings to such lengths as did
+the Schoolmen who succeeded him,--those dialecticians who lived in
+universities in the thirteenth century. He was a devout man, who
+meditated on God and on revealed truth with awe and reverence, without
+any desire of system-making or dialectical victories. This desire more
+properly marked the Scholastic doctors of the universities in a
+subsequent age, when, though philosophy had been invoked by Anselm to
+support theology, they virtually made theology subordinate to philosophy.
+It was his main effort to establish, on rational grounds, the existence
+of God, and afterwards the doctrines of the Trinity and the Incarnation.
+And yet with Anselm and Roscelin the Scholastic age began. They were the
+founders of the Realists and the Nominalists,--those two schools which
+divided the Church in the twelfth and thirteenth centuries, and which
+will probably go on together, under different names, as long as men shall
+believe and doubt. But this subject, on which I have only entered, must
+be deferred to the next lecture.</p>
+
+<p>AUTHORITIES.</p>
+
+<p>Church's Life of Saint Anselm; Neander's Church History; Milman's
+History of the Latin Church; Stockl's History of the Philosophy of the
+Middle Ages; Ueberweg's History of Philosophy; Wordsworth's
+Ecclesiastical Biography; Trench's Mediaeval Church History; Digby's
+Ages of Faith; Fleury's Ecclesiastical History; Dupin's Ecclesiastical
+History; Biographie Universelle; M. Rousselot's Histoire de la
+Philosophic du Moyen Age; Newman's Mission of the Benedictine Order;
+Dugdale's Monasticon; Hallam's Literature of Europe; Hampden's article
+on the Scholastic Philosophy, in Encyclopaedia Metropolitana.</p>
+
+
+<br><br><hr style="width: 35%;"><br><br>
+<h2><a name="THOMAS_AQUINAS."></a>THOMAS AQUINAS.</h2>
+
+<hr style="width: 25%;">
+
+<p>A.D. 1225(7)-1274.</p>
+
+<p>THE SCHOLASTIC PHILOSOPHY.</p>
+
+<p>We have seen how the cloister life of the Middle Ages developed
+meditative habits of mind, which were followed by a spirit of inquiry on
+deep theological questions. We have now to consider a great intellectual
+movement, stimulated by the effort to bring philosophy to the aid of
+theology, and thus more effectually to battle with insidious and rising
+heresies. The most illustrious representative of this movement was
+Thomas of Aquino, generally called Thomas Aquinas. With him we associate
+the Scholastic Philosophy, which, though barren in the results at which
+it aimed, led to a remarkable intellectual activity, and hence,
+indirectly, to the emancipation of the mind. It furnished teachers who
+prepared the way for the great lights of the Reformation.</p>
+
+<p>Anselm had successfully battled with the rationalism of Roscelin, and
+also had furnished a new argument for the existence of God. He secured
+the triumph of Realism for a time and the apparent extinction of
+heresy. But a new impulse to thought was given, soon after his death, by
+a less profound but more popular and brilliant man, and, like him, a
+monk. This was the celebrated Peter Ab&eacute;lard, born in the year 1079, in
+Brittany, of noble parents, and a boy of remarkable precocity. He was a
+sort of knight-errant of philosophy, going from convent to convent and
+from school to school, disputing, while a mere youth, with learned
+teachers, wherever he could find them. Having vanquished the masters in
+the provincial schools, he turned his steps to Paris, at that time the
+intellectual centre of Europe. The university was not yet established,
+but the cathedral school of Notre Dame was presided over by William of
+Champeaux, who defended the Realism of Anselm.</p>
+
+<p>To this famous cathedral school Ab&eacute;lard came as a pupil of the veteran
+dialectician at the age of twenty, and dared to dispute his doctrines.
+He soon set up as a teacher himself; but as Notre Dame was interdicted
+to him he retired to Melun, ten leagues from Paris, where enthusiastic
+pupils crowded to his lecture room, for he was witty, bold, sarcastic,
+acute, and eloquent. He afterwards removed to Paris, and so completely
+discomfited his old master that he retired from the field. Ab&eacute;lard then
+applied himself to the study of divinity, and attended the lectures of
+Anselm of Laon, who, though an old man, was treated by Ab&eacute;lard with
+great flippancy and arrogance. He then began to lecture on divinity as
+well as philosophy, with extraordinary <i>&eacute;clat</i>. Students flocked to his
+lecture room from all parts of Germany, Italy, France, and England. It
+is said that five thousand young men attended his lectures, among whom
+one hundred were destined to be prelates, including that brilliant and
+able Italian who afterwards reigned as Innocent III. It was about this
+time, 1117, when he was thirty-eight, that he encountered H&eacute;lo&iuml;se,--a
+passage of his life which will be considered in a later volume of this
+work. His unfortunate love and his cruel misfortune led to a temporary
+seclusion in a convent, from which, however, he issued to lecture with
+renewed popularity in a desert place in Champagne, where he constructed
+a vast edifice and dedicated it to the Paraclete. It was here that his
+most brilliant days were spent. It is said that three thousand pupils
+followed him to this wilderness. He was doubtless the most brilliant and
+successful lecturer that the Middle Ages ever saw. He continued the
+controversy which was begun by Roscelin respecting universals, the
+reality of which he denied.</p>
+
+<p>Ab&eacute;lard was not acquainted with the Greek, but in a Latin translation
+from the Arabic he had studied Aristotle, whom he regarded as the great
+master of dialectics, although not making use of his method, as did the
+great Scholastics of the succeeding century. Still, he was among the
+first to apply dialectics to theology. He maintained a certain
+independence of the patristic authority by his &quot;Sic et Non,&quot; in which
+treatise he makes the authorities neutralize each other by placing side
+by side contradictory assertions. He maintained that the natural
+propensity to evil, in consequence of the original transgression, is not
+in itself sin; that sin consists in consenting to evil. &quot;It is not,&quot;
+said he, &quot;the temptation to lust that is sinful, but the acquiescence in
+the temptation;&quot; hence, that virtue cannot be tested without
+temptations; consequently, that moral worth can only be truly estimated
+by God, to whom motives are known,--in short, that sin consists in the
+intention, and not in act. He admitted with Anselm that faith, in a
+certain sense, precedes knowledge, but insisted that one must know why
+and what he believes before his faith is established; hence, that faith
+works itself out of doubt by means of rational investigation.</p>
+
+<p>The tendency of Ab&eacute;lard's teachings was rationalistic, and therefore he
+arrayed against himself the great champion of orthodoxy in his
+day,--Saint Bernard, Abbot of Clairvaux, the most influential churchman
+of his age, and the most devout and lofty. His immense influence was
+based on his learning and sanctity; but he was dogmatic and intolerant.
+It is probable that the intellectual arrogance of Ab&eacute;lard, his flippancy
+and his sarcasms, offended more than the matter of his lectures. &quot;It is
+not by industry,&quot; said he, &quot;that I have reached the heights of
+philosophy, but by force of genius.&quot; He was more admired by young and
+worldly men than by old men. He was the admiration of women, for he was
+poet as well as philosopher. His love-songs were scattered over Europe.
+With a proud and aristocratic bearing, severe yet negligent dress,
+beautiful and noble figure, musical and electrical voice, added to the
+impression he made by his wit and dialectical power, no man ever
+commanded greater admiration from those who listened to him. But he
+excited envy as well as admiration, and was probably misrepresented by
+his opponents. Like all strong and original characters, he had bitter
+enemies as well as admiring friends; and these enemies exaggerated his
+failings and his heretical opinions. Therefore he was summoned before
+the Council of Soissons, and condemned to perpetual silence. From this
+he appealed to Rome, and Rome sided with his enemies. He found a
+retreat, after his condemnation, in the abbey of Cluny, and died in the
+arms of his friend Peter the Venerable, the most benignant ecclesiastic
+of the century, who venerated his genius and defended his orthodoxy, and
+whose influence procured him absolution from the Pope.</p>
+
+<p>But whatever were the faults of Ab&eacute;lard; however selfish he was in his
+treatment of H&eacute;lo&iuml;se, or proud and provoking to adversaries, or even
+heretical in many of his doctrines, especially in reference to faith,
+which he is accused of undermining, although he accepted in the main the
+received doctrines of the Church, certainly in his latter days, when he
+was broken and penitent (for no great man ever suffered more humiliating
+misfortunes),--one thing is clear, that he gave a stimulus to
+philosophical inquiries, and awakened a desire of knowledge, and gave
+dignity to human reason, beyond any man in the Middle Ages.</p>
+
+<p>The dialectical and controversial spirit awakened by Ab&eacute;lard led to such
+a variety of opinions among the inquiring young men who assembled in
+Paris at the various schools, some of which were regarded as
+rationalistic in their tendency, or at least a departure from the
+patristic standard, that Peter Lombard, Bishop of Paris, collected in
+four books the various sayings of the Fathers concerning theological
+dogmas. He was also influenced to make this exposition by the &quot;Sic et
+Non&quot; of Ab&eacute;lard, which tended to unsettle belief. This famous manual,
+called the &quot;Book of Sentences,&quot; appeared about the middle of the twelfth
+century, and had an immense influence. It was the great text-book of the
+theological schools.</p>
+
+<p>About the time this book appeared the works of Aristotle were introduced
+to the attention of students, translated into Latin from the Saracenic
+language. Aristotle had already been commented upon by Arabian scholars
+in Spain,--among whom Averroes, a physician and mathematician of
+Cordova, was the most distinguished,--who regarded the Greek philosopher
+as the founder of scientific knowledge. His works were translated from
+the Greek into the Arabic in the early part of the ninth century.</p>
+
+<p>The introduction of Aristotle led to an extension of philosophical
+studies. From the time of Charlemagne only grammar and elementary logic
+and dogmatic theology had been taught, but Ab&eacute;lard introduced dialectics
+into theology. A more complete method was required than that which the
+existing schools furnished, and this was supplied by the dialectics of
+Aristotle. He became, therefore, at the close of the twelfth century, an
+acknowledged authority, and his method was adopted to support the dogmas
+of the Church.</p>
+
+<p>Meanwhile the press of students at Paris, collected into various
+schools,--the chief of which were the theological school of Notre Dame,
+and the school of logic at Mount Genevi&egrave;ve, where Ab&eacute;lard had
+lectured,--demanded a new organization. The teachers and pupils of these
+schools then formed a corporation called a university (<i>Universitas
+Magistrorum et Scholarium</i>), under the control of the chancellor and
+chapter of Notre Dame, whose corporate existence was secured from
+Innocent III. a few years afterwards.</p>
+
+<p>Thus arose the University of Paris at the close of the twelfth century,
+or about the beginning of the thirteenth, soon followed in different
+parts of Europe by other universities, the most distinguished of which
+were those of Oxford, Bologna, Padua, and Salamanca. But that of Paris
+took the lead, this city being the intellectual centre of Europe even at
+that early day. Thither flocked young men from Germany, England, and
+Italy, as well as from all parts of France, to the number of twenty-five
+or thirty thousand. These students were a motley crowd: some of them
+were half-starved youth, with tattered clothes, living in garrets and
+unhealthy cells; others again were rich and noble,--but all were eager
+for knowledge. They came to Paris as pilgrims flocked to Jerusalem,
+being drawn by the fame of the lecturers. The old sleepy schools of the
+convents were deserted, for who would go to Fulda or York or Citeaux,
+when such men as Ab&eacute;lard, Albert, and Victor were dazzling enthusiastic
+youth by their brilliant disputations? These young men also seem to have
+been noisy, turbulent, and dissipated for the most part, &quot;filling the
+streets with their brawls and the taverns with the fumes of liquor.
+There was no such thing as discipline among them. They yelled and
+shouted and brandished daggers, fought the townspeople, and were free
+with their knocks and blows.&quot; They were not all youth; many of them were
+men in middle life, with wives and children. At that time no one
+finished his education at twenty-one; some remained scholars until the
+age of thirty-five.</p>
+
+<p>Some of these students came to study medicine, others law, but more
+theology and philosophy. The headquarters of theology was the Sorbonne,
+opened in 1253,--a college founded by Robert Sorbon, chaplain of the
+king, whose aim was to bring together the students and professors,
+heretofore scattered throughout the city. The students of this college,
+which formed a part of the university, under the rule of the chancellor
+of Notre Dame, it would seem were more orderly and studious than the
+other students. They arose at five, assisted at Mass at six, studied
+till ten,--the dinner hour; from dinner till five they studied or
+attended lectures; then went to supper,--the principal meal; after which
+they discussed problems till nine or ten, when they went to bed. The
+students were divided into <i>hospites</i> and <i>socii</i>, the latter of whom
+carried on the administration. The lectures were given in a large hall,
+in the middle of which was the chair of the master or doctor, while
+immediately below him sat his assistant, the bachelor, who was going
+through his training for a professorship. The chair of theology was the
+most coveted honor of the university, and was reached only by a long
+course of study and searching examinations, to which no one could aspire
+but the most learned and gifted of the doctors. The students sat around
+on benches, or on the straw. There were no writing-desks. The teaching
+was oral, principally by questions and answers. Neither the master nor
+the bachelor used a book. No reading was allowed. The students rarely
+took notes or wrote in short-hand; they listened to the lectures and
+wrote them down afterwards, so far as their memory served them. The
+usual text-book was the &quot;Book of Sentences,&quot; by Peter Lombard. The
+bachelor, after having previously studied ten years, was obliged to go
+through a three years' drill, and then submit to a public examination in
+presence of the whole university before he was thought fit to teach. He
+could not then receive his master's badge until he had successfully
+maintained a public disputation on some thesis proposed; and even then
+he stood no chance of being elevated to a professor's chair unless he
+had lectured for some time with great <i>&eacute;clat</i> Even Albertus Magnus,
+fresh with the laurels of Cologne, was compelled to go through a three
+years' course as a sub-teacher at Paris before he received his doctor's
+cap, and to lecture for some years more as master before his
+transcendent abilities were rewarded with a professorship. The dean of
+the faculty of theology was chosen by the suffrages of the doctors.</p>
+
+<p>The <i>Organum</i> (philosophy of first principles) of Aristotle was first
+publicly taught in 1215. This was certainly in advance of the seven
+liberal arts which were studied in the old Cathedral schools,--grammar,
+rhetoric, and dialectic (Trivium); and arithmetic, geometry, music, and
+astronomy (Quadrivium),--for only the elements of these were taught. But
+philosophy and theology, under the teaching of the Scholastic doctors
+(<i>Doctores Scholastici</i>), taxed severely the intellectual powers. When
+they introduced dialectics to support theology a more severe method was
+required. &quot;The method consisted in connecting the doctrine to be
+expounded with a commentary on some work chosen for the purpose. The
+contents were divided and subdivided, until the several propositions of
+which it was composed were reached. Then these were interpreted,
+questions were raised in reference to them, and the grounds of affirming
+or denying were presented. Then the decision was announced, and in case
+this was affirmative, the grounds of the negative were confuted.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>Aristotle was made use of in order to reduce to scientific form a body
+of dogmatic teachings, or to introduce a logical arrangement. Platonism,
+embraced by the early Fathers, was a collection of abstractions and
+theories, but was deficient in method. It did not furnish the weapons to
+assail heresy with effect. But Aristotle was logical and precise and
+passionless. He examined the nature of language, and was clear and
+accurate in his definitions. His logic was studied with the sole view
+of learning to use polemical weapons. For this end the syllogism was
+introduced, which descends from the universal to the particular, by
+deduction,--connecting the general with the special by means of a middle
+term which is common to both. This mode of reasoning is opposite to the
+method by induction, which rises to the universal from a comparison of
+the single and particular, or, as applied in science, from a collection
+and collation of facts sufficient to form a certainty or high
+probability. A sound special deduction can be arrived at only by logical
+inference from true and certain general principles.</p>
+
+<p>This is what Anselm essayed to do; but the Schoolmen who succeeded
+Ab&eacute;lard often drew dialectical inferences from what appeared to be true,
+while some of them were so sophistical as to argue from false premises.
+This syllogistic reasoning, in the hands of an acute dialectician, was
+very efficient in overthrowing an antagonist, or turning his position
+into absurdity, but not favorable for the discovery of truth, since it
+aimed no higher than the establishment of the particulars which were
+included in the doctrine assumed or deduced from it. It was reasoning in
+perpetual circles; it was full of quibbles and sophistries; it was
+ingenious, subtle, acute, very attractive to the minds of that age, and
+inexhaustible from divisions and subdivisions and endless
+ramifications. It made the contests of the schools a dialectical display
+of remarkable powers in which great interest was felt, yet but little
+knowledge was acquired. In one respect the Scholastic doctors rendered a
+service: they demolished all dreamy theories and poured contempt on
+mystical phrases. They insisted, like Socrates, on a definite meaning to
+words. If they were hair-splitting in their definitions and
+distinctions, they were at least clear and precise. Their method was
+scientific. Such terms and expressions as are frequently used by our
+modern transcendental philosophers would have been laughed to scorn by
+the Schoolmen. No system of philosophy can be built up when words have
+no definite meaning. This Socrates was the first to inculcate, and
+Aristotle followed in his steps.</p>
+
+<p>With the Crusades arose a new spirit, which gave an impulse to
+philosophy as well as to art and enterprise. &quot;The <i>primum mobile</i> of the
+new system was Motion, in distinction from the Rest which marked the old
+monastic retreats.&quot; An immense enthusiasm for knowledge had been kindled
+by Ab&eacute;lard, which was further intensified by the Scholastic doctors of
+the thirteenth century, especially such of them as belonged to the
+Dominican and Franciscan friars.</p>
+
+<p>These celebrated Orders arose at a great crisis in the Papal history,
+when rival popes aspired to the throne of Saint Peter, when the Church
+was rent with divisions, when princes were contending for the right of
+investiture, and when heretical opinions were defended by men of genius.
+At this crisis a great Pope was called to the government of the
+Church,--Innocent III., under whose able rule the papal power
+culminated. He belonged to an illustrious Roman family, and received an
+unusual education, being versed in theology, philosophy, and canon law.
+His name was Lothario, of the family of the Conti; he was nephew of a
+pope, and counted three cardinals among his relatives. At the age of
+twenty-one, about the year 1181, he was one of the canons of Saint
+Peter's Church; at twenty-four he was sent by the Pope on important
+missions. In 1188 he was created cardinal by his uncle, Clement III.;
+and in 1198 he was elected Pope, at the age of thirty-eight, when the
+Crusades were at their height, when the south of France was agitated by
+the opinions of the Albigenses, and the provinces on the Rhine by those
+of the Waldenses. It was a turbulent age, full of tumults,
+insurrections, wars, and theological dissensions. The old Benedictine
+monks had lost their influence, and were disgraced by idleness and
+gluttony, while the secular clergy were ignorant and worldly. Innocent
+cast his eagle eye into all the abuses which disgraced the age and
+Church, and made fearless war upon those princes who usurped his
+prerogatives. He excommunicated princes, humbled the Emperor of Germany
+and the King of England, put kingdoms under interdict, exempted abbots
+from the jurisdiction of bishops, punished heretics, formed crusades,
+laid down new canons, regulated taxes, and directed all ecclesiastical
+movements. His activity was ceaseless, and his ambition was boundless.
+He instituted important changes, and added new orders of monks to the
+Church. It was this Pope who instituted auricular confession, and laid
+the foundation of a more dreadful spiritual despotism in the form of
+inquisitions.</p>
+
+<p>Yet while he ruled tyrannically, his private life was above reproach.
+His habits were simple and his tastes were cultivated. He was charitable
+and kind to the poor and unfortunate. He spent his enormous revenues in
+building churches, endowing hospitals, and rewarding learned men; and
+otherwise showed himself the friend of scholars, and the patron of
+benevolent movements. He was a reformer of abuses, publishing the most
+severe acts against venality, and deciding quarrels on principles of
+justice. He had no dramatic conflicts like Hildebrand, for his authority
+was established. As the supreme guardian of the interests of the Church
+he seldom made demands which he had not the power to enforce. John of
+England attempted resistance, but was compelled to submit. Innocent
+even gave the archbishopric of Canterbury to one of his cardinals,
+Stephen Langton, against the wishes of a Norman king. He took away the
+wife of Philip Augustus; he nominated an emperor to the throne of
+Constantine; he compelled France to make war on England, and incited the
+barons to rebellion against John. Ten years' civil war in Germany was
+the fruit of his astute policy, and the only great failure of his
+administration was that he could not exempt Italy from the dominion of
+the Emperors of Germany, thus giving rise to the two great political
+parties of the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries,--the Guelphs and
+Ghibellines.</p>
+
+<p>To cement his vast spiritual power he encouraged what doubtless seemed
+even to him a great fanaticism, but which he found could be turned to
+his advantage,--that of the Mendicant Friars, established by Saint
+Francis of Assisi, and Saint Dominic of the great family of the Guzmans
+in Spain. These men made substantially the same offers to the Pope that
+Ignatius Loyola did in after times,--to go where they were sent as
+teachers, preachers, and missionaries without condition or reward. They
+renounced riches, professed absolute poverty, and wandered from village
+to city barefooted, and subsisting entirely on alms as beggars. The
+Dominican friar in his black habit, and the Franciscan in his gray,
+became the ablest and most effective preachers of the thirteenth
+century. The Dominicans confined their teachings to the upper classes,
+and became their favorite confessors. They were the most learned men of
+the thirteenth century, and also the most reproachless in morals. The
+Franciscans were itinerary preachers to the common people, and created
+among them the same religious revival that the Methodists did later in
+England under the guidance of Wesley. The founder of the Franciscans was
+a man who seemed to be &quot;inebriated with love,&quot; so unquenchable was his
+charity, rapt his devotions, and supernal his sympathy. He found his way
+to Rome in the year 1215, and in twenty-two years after his death there
+were nine thousand religious houses of his Order. In a century from his
+death the friars numbered one hundred and fifty thousand. The increase
+of the Dominicans was not so rapid, but more illustrious men belonged to
+this institution. It is affirmed that it produced seventy cardinals,
+four hundred and sixty bishops, and four popes.</p>
+
+<p>It was in the palmy days of these celebrated monks, before corruption
+had set in, that the Dominican Order was recruited with one of the most
+extraordinary men of the Middle Ages. This man was Saint Thomas, born
+1225 or 1227, son of a Count of Aquino in the kingdom of Naples, known
+in history as Thomas Aquinas, &quot;the most successful organizer of
+knowledge,&quot; says Archbishop Trench, &quot;the world has known since
+Aristotle.&quot; He was called &quot;the angelical doctor,&quot; exciting the
+enthusiasm of his age for his learning and piety and genius alike. He
+was a prodigy and a marvel of dialectical skill, and Catholic writers
+have exhausted language to find expressions for their admiration. Their
+Lives of him are an unbounded panegyric for the sweetness of his temper,
+his wonderful self-control, his lofty devotion to study, his
+indifference to praises and rewards, his spiritual devotion, his loyalty
+to the Church, his marvellous acuteness of intellect, his industry, and
+his unparalleled logical victories. When he was five years of age his
+father, a noble of very high rank, sent him to Monte Cassino with the
+hope that he would become a Benedictine monk, and ultimately abbot of
+that famous monastery, with the control of its vast revenues and
+patronage. Here he remained seven years, until the convent was taken and
+sacked by the soldiers of the Emperor Frederic in his war with the Pope.
+The young Aquino returned to his father's castle, and was then sent to
+Naples to be educated at the university, living in a Benedictine abbey,
+and not in lodgings like other students. The Dominicans and Franciscans
+held chairs in the university, one of which was filled with a man of
+great ability, whose preaching and teaching had such great influence on
+the youthful Thomas that he resolved to join the Order, and at the age
+of seventeen became a Dominican friar, to the disappointment of his
+family. His mother Theodora went to Naples to extricate him from the
+hands of the Dominicans, who secretly hurried him off to Rome and
+immured him in their convent, from which he was rescued by violence. But
+the youth persisted in his intentions against the most passionate
+entreaties of his mother, made his escape, and was carried back to
+Naples. The Pope, at the solicitation of his family, offered to make him
+Abbot of Monte Cassino, but he remained a poor Dominican. His superior,
+seeing his remarkable talents, sent him to Cologne to attend the
+lectures of Albertus Magnus, then the most able expounder of the
+Scholastic Philosophy, and the oracle of the universities, who continued
+his lectures after he was made a bishop, and even until he was
+eighty-five. When Albertus was transferred from Cologne to Paris, where
+the Dominicans held two chairs of theology, Thomas followed him, and
+soon after was made bachelor. Again was Albert sent back to Cologne, and
+Thomas was made his assistant professor. He at once attracted attention,
+was ordained priest, and became as famous for his sermons as for his
+lectures. After four years at Cologne Thomas was ordered back to Paris,
+travelling on foot, and begging his way, yet stopping to preach in the
+large cities. He was still magister and Albert professor, but had
+greatly distinguished himself by his lectures.</p>
+
+<p>His appearance at this time was marked. His body was tall and massive,
+but spare and lean from fasting and labor. His eyes were bright, but
+their expression was most modest. His face was oblong, his complexion
+sallow; his forehead depressed, his head large, his person erect.</p>
+
+<p>His first great work was a commentary of about twelve hundred pages on
+the &quot;Book of Sentences,&quot; in the Parma edition, which was received with
+great admiration for its logical precision, and its opposition to the
+rationalistic tendencies of the times. In it are discussed all the great
+theological questions treated by Saint Augustine,--God, Christ, the Holy
+Spirit, grace, predestination, faith, free-will, Providence, and the
+like,--blended with metaphysical discussions on the soul, the existence
+of evil, the nature of angels, and other subjects which interested the
+Middle Ages. Such was his fame and dialectical skill that he was taken
+away from his teachings and sent to Rome to defend his Order and the
+cause of orthodoxy against the slanders of William of Saint Amour, an
+aristocratic doctor, who hated the Mendicant Friars and their wandering
+and begging habits. William had written a book called &quot;Perils,&quot; in which
+he exposed the dangers to be apprehended from the new order of monks,
+in which he proved himself a true prophet, for ultimately the Mendicant
+Friars became subjects of ridicule and reproach. But the Pope came to
+the rescue of his best supporters.</p>
+
+<p>On the return of Thomas to Paris he was made doctor of theology, at the
+same time with Bonaventura the Franciscan, called &quot;the seraphic doctor,&quot;
+between whom and Thomas were intimate ties of friendship. He had now
+reached the highest honor that the university could bestow, which was
+conferred with such extraordinary ceremony that it would seem to have
+been a great event in Paris at that time.</p>
+
+<p>His fame chiefly rests on the ablest treatise written in the Middle
+Ages,--the &quot;Summa Theologica,&quot;--in which all the great questions in
+theology and philosophy are minutely discussed, in the most exhaustive
+manner. He took the side of the Realists, his object being to uphold
+Saint Augustine. He was more a Platonist in his spirit than an
+Aristotelian, although he was indebted to Aristotle for his method. He
+appealed to both reason and authority. He presented the Christian
+religion in a scientific form. His book is an assimilation of all that
+is precious in the thinking of the Church. If he learned many things at
+Paris, Cologne, and Naples, he was also educated by Chrysostom, by
+Augustine, and Ambrose. &quot;It is impossible,&quot; says Cardinal Newman, and no
+authority is higher than his, &quot;to read the <i>Catena</i> of Saint Thomas
+without being struck by the masterly skill with which he put it
+together. A learning of the highest kind,--not mere literary book
+knowledge which may have supplied the place of indexes and tables in
+ages destitute of these helps, and when they had to be read in
+unarranged and fragmentary manuscripts, but a thorough acquaintance with
+the whole range of ecclesiastical antiquity, so as to be able to bring
+the substance of all that had been written on any point to bear upon the
+text which involved it,--a familiarity with the style of each writer so
+as to compress in a few words the pith of the whole page, and a power of
+clear and orderly arrangement in this mass of knowledge, are qualities
+which make this <i>Catena</i> nearly perfect as an interpretation of
+Patristic literature.&quot; Dr. Vaughan, in eulogistic language, says: &quot;The
+'Summa Theologica' may be likened to one of the great cathedrals of the
+Middle Ages, infinite in detail but massive in the grouping of pillars
+and arches, forming a complete unity that must have taxed the brain of
+the architect to its greatest extent. But greater as work of intellect
+is this digest of all theological richness for one thousand years, in
+which the thread of discourse is never lost sight of, but winds through
+a labyrinth of important discussions and digressions, all bearing on the
+fundamental truths which Paul declared and Augustine systematized.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>This treatise would seem to be a thesaurus of both Patristic and
+Mediaeval learning; not a dictionary of knowledge, but a system of truth
+severely elaborated in every part,--a work to be studied by the
+Mediaeval students as Calvin's &quot;Institutes&quot; were by the scholars of the
+Reformation, and not far different in its scope and end; for the
+Patristic, the Mediaeval, and the Protestant divines did not materially
+differ in reference to the fundamental truths pertaining to God, the
+Incarnation, and Redemption. The Catholic and Protestant divines differ
+chiefly on the ideas pertaining to government and ecclesiastical
+institutions, and the various inventions of the Middle Ages to uphold
+the authority of the Church, not on dogmas strictly theological. A
+student in theology could even in our times sit at the feet of Thomas
+Aquinas, as he could at the feet of Augustine or Calvin; except that in
+the theology which Thomas Aquinas commented upon there is a cumbrous
+method, borrowed from Aristotle, which introduced infinite distinctions
+and questions and definitions and deductions and ramifications which
+have no charm to men who have other things to occupy their minds than
+Scholastic subtilties, acute and logical as they may be. Thomas Aquinas
+was raised to combat, with the weapons most esteemed in his day, the
+various forms of Rationalism, Pantheism, and Mysticism which then
+existed, and were included in the Nominalism of his antagonists. And as
+long as universities are centres of inquiry the same errors, under other
+names, will have to be combated, but probably not with the same methods
+which marked the teachings of the &quot;angelical doctor.&quot; In demolishing
+errors and systematizing truth he was the greatest benefactor to the
+cause of &quot;orthodoxy&quot; that appeared in Europe for several centuries,
+admired for his genius as much as Spencer and other great lights of
+science are in our day, but standing preeminent and lofty over all, like
+a beacon light to give both guidance and warning to inquiring minds in
+every part of Christendom. Nor could popes and sovereigns render too
+great honor to such a prodigy of genius. They offered him the abbacy of
+Monte Cassino and the archbishopric of Naples, but he preferred the life
+of a quiet student, finding in knowledge and study, for their own sake,
+the highest reward, and pursuing his labors without the <i>impedimenta</i> of
+those high positions which involve ceremonies and cares and pomps, yet
+which most ambitious men love better than freedom, placidity, and
+intellectual repose. He lived not in a palace, as he might have lived,
+surrounded with flatterers, luxuries, and dignities, but in a cell,
+wearing his simple black gown, and walking barefooted wherever he went,
+begging his daily bread according to the rules of his Order. His black
+gown was not an academic badge, but the Dominican dress. His only badge
+of distinction was the doctors' cap.</p>
+
+<p>Dr. Vaughan, in his heavy and unartistic life of Thomas Aquinas, has
+drawn a striking resemblance between Plato and the Mediaeval doctor:
+&quot;Both,&quot; he says, &quot;were nobly born, both were grave from youth, both
+loved truth with an intensity of devotion. If Plato was instructed by
+Socrates, Aquinas was taught by Albertus Magnus; if Plato travelled into
+Italy, Greece, and Egypt, Aquinas went to Cologne, Naples, Bologna, and
+Rome; if Plato was famous for his erudition, Aquinas was no less noted
+for his universal knowledge. Both were naturally meek and gentle; both
+led lives of retirement and contemplation; both loved solitude; both
+were celebrated for self-control; both were brave; both held their
+pupils spell-bound by their brilliant mental gifts; both passed their
+time in lecturing to the schools (what the Pythagoreans were to Plato,
+the Benedictines were to the angelical); both shrank from the display of
+self; both were great dialecticians; both reposed on eternal ideas; both
+were oracles to their generation.&quot; But if Aquinas had the soul of Plato,
+he also had the scholastic gifts of Aristotle, to whom the Church is
+indebted for method and nomenclature as it was to Plato for synthesis
+and that exalted Realism which went hand in hand with Christianity. How
+far he was indebted to Plato it is difficult to say. He certainly had
+not studied his dialectics through translations or in the original, but
+had probably imbibed the spirit of this great philosopher through Saint
+Augustine and other orthodox Fathers who were his admirers.</p>
+
+<p>Although both Plato and Aristotle accepted &quot;universals&quot; as the
+foundation of scientific inquiry, the former arrived at them by
+consciousness, and the other by reasoning. The spirit of the two great
+masters of thought was as essentially different as their habits and
+lives. Plato believed that God governed the world; Aristotle believed
+that it was governed by chance. The former maintained that mind is
+divine and eternal; the latter that it is a form of the body, and
+consequently mortal. Plato thought that the source of happiness was in
+virtue and resemblance to God; while Aristotle placed it in riches and
+outward prosperity. Plato believed in prayer; but Aristotle thought that
+God would not hear or answer it, and therefore that it was useless.
+Plato believed in happiness after death; while Aristotle supposed that
+death ended all pleasure. Plato lived in the world of abstract ideas;
+Aristotle in the realm of sense and observation. The one was religious;
+the other secular and worldly. With both the passion for knowledge was
+boundless, but they differed in their conceptions of knowledge; the one
+basing it on eternal ideas and the deductions to be drawn from them,
+and the other on physical science,--the phenomena of Nature,--those
+things which are cognizable by the senses. The spiritual life of Plato
+was &quot;a longing after love and of eternal ideas, by the contemplation of
+which the soul sustains itself and becomes participant in immortality.&quot;
+The life of Aristotle was not spiritual, but intellectual. He was an
+incarnation of mere intellect, the architect of a great temple of
+knowledge, which received the name of <i>Organum</i>, or the philosophy of
+first principles.</p>
+
+<p>Thomas Aquinas, we may see from what has been said, was both Platonic
+and Aristotelian. He resembled Plato in his deep and pious meditations
+on the eternal realities of the spiritual world, while in the severity
+of his logic he resembled Aristotle, from whom he learned precision of
+language, lucidity of statement, and a syllogistic mode of argument well
+calculated to confirm what was already known, but not to make
+attainments in new fields of thought or knowledge. If he was gentle and
+loving and pious like Plato, he was also as calm and passionless as
+Aristotle.</p>
+
+<p>This great man died at the age of forty-eight, in the year 1274, a few
+years after Saint Louis, before his sum of theology was completed. He
+died prematurely, exhausted by his intense studies; leaving, however,
+treatises which filled seventeen printed folio volumes,--one of the most
+voluminous writers of the world. His fame was prodigious, both as a
+dialectician and a saint, and he was in due time canonized as one of the
+great pillars of the Church, ranking after Chrysostom, Jerome,
+Augustine, and Gregory the Great,--the standard authority for centuries
+of the Catholic theology.</p>
+
+<p>The Scholastic Philosophy, which culminated in Thomas Aquinas,
+maintained its position in the universities of Europe until the
+Reformation, but declined in earnestness. It descended to the discussion
+of unimportant and often frivolous questions. Even the &quot;angelical
+doctor&quot; is quoted as discussing the absurd question as to how many
+angels could dance together on the point of a needle. The play of words
+became interminable. Things were lost sight of in a barbarous jargon
+about questions which have no interest to humanity, and which are
+utterly unintelligible. At the best, logical processes can add nothing
+to the ideas from which they start. When these ideas are lofty,
+discussion upon them elevates the mind and doubtless strengthens its
+powers. But when the subjects themselves are frivolous, the logical
+tournaments in their defence degrade the intellect and narrow it.
+Nothing destroys intellectual dignity more effectually than the waste of
+energies in the defence of what is of no practical utility, and which
+cannot be applied to the acquisition of solid knowledge. Hence the
+Scholastic Philosophy did not advance knowledge, since it did not seek
+the acquisition of new truths, but only the establishment of the old.
+Its utility consisted in training the human mind to logical reasonings.
+It exercised the intellect and strengthened it, as gymnastics do the
+body, without enlarging it. It was nothing but barren dialectics,--&quot;dry
+bones,&quot; a perpetual fencing. The soul cries out for bread; the
+Scholastics gave it a stone.</p>
+
+<p>We are amazed that intellectual giants, equal to the old Greeks in
+acuteness and logical powers, could waste their time on the frivolous
+questions and dialectical subtilties to which they devoted their mighty
+powers. However interesting to them, nothing is drier and duller to us,
+nothing more barren and unsatisfying, than their logical sports. Their
+treatises are like trees with endless branches, each leading to new
+ramifications, with no central point in view, and hence never finished,
+and which might be carried on <i>ad infinitum</i>. To attempt to read their
+disquisitions is like walking in labyrinths of ever-opening intricacies.
+By such a method no ultimate truth could be arrived at, beyond what was
+assumed. There is now and then a man who professes to have derived light
+and wisdom from those dialectical displays, since they were doubtless
+marvels of logical precision and clearness of statement. But in a
+practical point of view those &quot;masterpieces of logic&quot; are utterly
+useless to most modern inquirers. These are interesting only as they
+exhibit the waste of gigantic energies; they do not even have the merit
+of illustrative rhetoric or eloquence. The earlier monks were devout and
+spiritual, and we can still read their lofty meditations with profit,
+since they elevate the soul and make it pant for the beatitudes of
+spiritual communion with God. But the writings of the Scholastic doctors
+are cold, calm, passionless, and purely intellectual,--logical without
+being edifying. We turn from them, however acute and able, with blended
+disappointment and despair. They are fig-trees, bearing nothing but
+leaves, such as our Lord did curse. The distinctions are simply
+metaphysical, and not moral.</p>
+
+<p>Why the whole force of an awakening age should have been devoted to such
+subtilties and barren discussion it is difficult to see, unless they
+were found useful in supporting a theology made up of metaphysical
+deductions rather than an interpretation of the meaning of Scripture
+texts. But there was then no knowledge of Greek or Hebrew; there was no
+exegetical research; there was no science and no real learning. There
+was nothing but theology, with the exception of Lives of the Saints. The
+horizon of human inquiries was extremely narrow. But when the minds of
+very intellectual men were directed to one particular field, it would be
+natural to expect something remarkable and marvellously elaborate of
+its kind. Such was the Scholastic Philosophy. As a mere exhibition of
+dialectical acumen, minute distinctions, and logical precision in the
+use of words, it was wonderful. The intricacy and detail and
+ramifications of this system were an intellectual feat which astonishes
+us, yet which does not instruct us, certainly outside of a metaphysical
+divinity which had more charm to the men of the Middle Ages than it can
+have to us, even in a theological school where dogmatic divinity is made
+the most important study. The day will soon come when the principal
+chair in the theological school will be for the explanation of the
+Scripture texts on which dogmas are based; and for this, great learning
+and scholarship will be indispensable. To me it is surprising that
+metaphysics have so long retained their hold on the minds of Protestant
+divines. Nothing is more unsatisfactory, and to many more repulsive,
+than metaphysical divinity. It is a perversion of the spirit of
+Christian teachings. &quot;What says our Lord?&quot; should be the great inquiry
+in our schools of theology; not, What deductions can be drawn from them
+by a process of ingenious reasoning which often, without reference to
+other important truths, lands one in absurdities, or at least in
+one-sided systems?</p>
+
+<p>But the metaphysical divinity of the Schoolmen had great attractions to
+the students of the Middle Ages. And there must have been something in
+it which we do not appreciate, or it would not have maintained itself in
+the schools for three hundred years. Perhaps it was what those ages
+needed,--the discipline through which the mind must go before it could
+be prepared for the scientific investigations of our own times. In an
+important sense the Scholastic doctors were the teachers of Luther and
+Bacon. Certainly their unsatisfactory science was one of the marked
+developments of the civilization of Europe, through which the Gothic
+nations must need pass. It has been the fashion to ridicule it and
+depreciate it in our modern times, especially among Protestants, who
+have ridiculed and slandered the papal power and all the institutions of
+the Middle Ages. Yet scholars might as well ridicule the text-books they
+were required to study fifty years ago, because they are not up to our
+times. We should not disdain the early steps by which future progress is
+made easy. We cannot despise men who gave up their lives to the
+contemplation of subjects which demand the highest tension of the
+intellectual faculties, even if these exercises were barren of
+utilitarian results. Some future age may be surprised at the comparative
+unimportance of questions which interest this generation. The Scholastic
+Philosophy cannot indeed be utilized by us in the pursuit of scientific
+knowledge; nor (to recur to Vaughan's simile for the great work of
+Aquinas) can a mediaeval cathedral be utilized for purposes of oratory
+or business. But the cathedral is nevertheless a grand monument,
+suggesting lofty sentiments, which it would be senseless and ruthless
+barbarism to destroy or allow to fall into decay, but which should
+rather be preserved as a precious memento of what is most poetic and
+attractive in the Middle Ages. When any modern philosopher shall rear so
+gigantic and symmetrical a monument of logical disquisitions as the
+&quot;Summa Theologica&quot; is said to be by the most competent authorities, then
+the sneers of a Macaulay or a Lewes will be entitled to more
+consideration. It is said that a new edition of this great Mediaeval
+work is about to be published under the direct auspices of the Pope, as
+the best and most comprehensive system of Christian theology ever
+written by man.</p>
+
+<p>AUTHORITIES.</p>
+
+<p>Dr. Vaughan's Life of Thomas Aquinas; Histoire de la Vie et des &Eacute;crits
+de St. Thomas d'Aquin, par l'Abb&eacute; Bareille; Lacordaire's Life of Saint
+Dominic; Dr. Hampden's Life of Thomas Aquinas; article on Thomas
+Aquinas, in London Quarterly, July, 1881; Summa Theologica; Neander,
+Milman, Fleury, Dupin, and Ecclesiastical Histories generally;
+Biographic Universelle; Werner's Leben des Heiligen Thomas von Aquino;
+Trench's Lectures on Mediaeval History; Ueberweg &amp; Rousselot's History
+of Philosophy. Dr. Hampden's article, in the Encyclopaedia
+Metropolitana, on Thomas Aquinas and the Scholastic Philosophy, is
+regarded by Hallam as the ablest view of this subject which has appeared
+in English.</p>
+
+
+<br><br><hr style="width: 35%;"><br><br>
+<h2><a name="THOMAS_BECKET."></a>THOMAS BECKET.</h2>
+
+<hr style="width: 25%;">
+
+<p>A.D. 1118-1170.</p>
+
+<p>PRELATICAL POWER.</p>
+
+<p>A great deal has been written of late years on Thomas Becket, Archbishop
+of Canterbury in the reign of Henry II.,--some historians writing him
+up, and others writing him down; some making him a martyr to the Church,
+and others representing him as an ambitious prelate who encroached on
+royal authority,--more of a rebel than a patriot. His history has become
+interesting, in view of this very discrepancy of opinion,--like that of
+Oliver Cromwell, one of those historical puzzles which always have
+attraction to critics. And there is abundant material for either side we
+choose to take. An advocate can make a case in reference to Becket's
+career with more plausibility than about any other great character in
+English history,--with the exception of Queen Elizabeth, Cromwell, and
+Archbishop Laud.</p>
+
+<p>The cause of Becket was the cause of the Middle Ages. He was not the
+advocate of fundamental principles, as were Burke and Bacon. He fought
+either for himself, or for principles whose importance has in a measure
+passed away. He was a high-churchman, who sought to make the temporal
+power subordinate to the spiritual. He appears in an interesting light
+only so far as the principles he sought to establish were necessary for
+the elevation of society in his ignorant and iron age. Moreover, it was
+his struggles which give to his life its chief charm, and invest it with
+dramatic interest. It was his energy, his audacity, his ability in
+overcoming obstacles, which made him memorable,--one of the heroes of
+history, like Ambrose and Hildebrand; an ecclesiastical warrior who
+fought bravely, and died without seeing the fruits of his bravery.</p>
+
+<p>There seems to be some discrepancy among historians as to Becket's birth
+and origin, some making him out a pure Norman, and others a Saxon, and
+others again half Saracen. But that is, after all, a small matter,
+although the critics make a great thing of it. They always are inclined
+to wrangle over unimportant points. Michelet thinks he was a Saxon, and
+that his mother was a Saracen lady of rank, who had become enamored of
+the Saxon when taken prisoner while on a pilgrimage to the Holy Land,
+and who returned with him to England, embraced his religion, and was
+publicly baptized in Saint Paul's Cathedral, her beauty and rank having
+won attention; but Mr. Froude and Milman regard this as a late legend.</p>
+
+<p>It would seem, however, that he was born in London about the year 1118
+or 1119, and that his father, Gilbert Becket, was probably a respectable
+merchant and sheriff, or portreeve, of London, and was a Norman. His
+parents died young, leaving him not well provided for; but being
+beautiful and bright he was sent to school in an abbey, and afterwards
+to Oxford. From Oxford he went into a house of business in London for
+three years, and contrived to attract the notice of Theobald, Archbishop
+of Canterbury, who saw his talents, sent him to Paris, and thence to
+Bologna to study the canon law, which was necessary to a young man who
+would rise in the world. He was afterwards employed by Theobald in
+confidential negotiations. The question of the day in England was
+whether Stephen's son (Eustace) or Matilda's son (Henry of Anjou) was
+the true heir to the crown, it being settled that Stephen should
+continue to rule during his lifetime, and that Henry should peaceably
+follow him; which happened in a little more than a year. Becket had
+espoused the side of Henry.</p>
+
+<p>The reign of Henry II., during which Becket's memorable career took
+place, was an important one. He united, through his mother Matilda, the
+blood of the old Saxon kings with that of the Norman dukes. He was the
+first truly English sovereign who had sat on the throne since the
+Conquest. In his reign (1154-1189) the blending of the Norman and Saxon
+races was effected. Villages and towns rose around the castles of great
+Norman nobles and the cathedrals and abbeys of Norman ecclesiastics.
+Ultimately these towns obtained freedom. London became a great city with
+more than a hundred churches. The castles, built during the disastrous
+civil wars of Stephen's usurped reign, were demolished. Peace and order
+were restored by a legitimate central power.</p>
+
+<p>Between the young monarch of twenty-two and Thomas, as a favorite of
+Theobald and as Archdeacon of Canterbury, an intimacy sprang up. Henry
+II. was the most powerful sovereign of Western Europe, since he was not
+only King of England, but had inherited in France Anjou and Touraine
+from his father, and Normandy and Maine from his mother. By his marriage
+with Eleanor of Aquitaine, he gained seven other provinces as her dower.
+The dominions of Louis were not half so great as his, even in France.
+And Henry was not only a powerful sovereign by his great territorial
+possessions, but also for his tact and ability. He saw the genius of
+Becket and made him his chancellor, loading him with honors and
+perquisites and Church benefices.</p>
+
+<p>The power of Becket as chancellor was very great, since he was prime
+minister, and the civil administration of the kingdom was chiefly
+intrusted to him, embracing nearly all the functions now performed by
+the various members of the Cabinet. As chancellor he rendered great
+services. He effected a decided improvement in the state of the country;
+it was freed from robbers and bandits, and brought under dominion of the
+law. He depressed the power of the feudal nobles; he appointed the most
+deserving people to office; he repaired the royal palaces, increased the
+royal revenues, and promoted agricultural industry. He seems to have
+pursued a peace policy. But he was unscrupulous and grasping. His style
+of life when chancellor was for that age magnificent: Wolsey, in after
+times, scarcely excelled him. His dress was as rich as barbaric taste
+could make it,--for the more barbarous the age, the more gorgeous is the
+attire of great dignitaries. &quot;The hospitalities of the chancellor were
+unbounded. He kept seven hundred horsemen completely armed. The
+harnesses of his horses were embossed with gold and silver. The most
+powerful nobles sent their sons to serve in his household as pages; and
+nobles and knights waited in his antechamber. There never passed a day
+when he did not make rich presents.&quot; His expenditure was enormous. He
+rivalled the King in magnificence. His sideboard was loaded with vessels
+of gold and silver. He was doubtless ostentatious, but his hospitality
+was free, and his person was as accessible as a primitive bishop. He is
+accused of being light and frivolous; but this I doubt. He had too many
+cares and duties for frivolity. He doubtless unbent. All men loaded down
+with labors must unbend somewhere. It was nothing against him that he
+told good stories at the royal table, or at his own, surrounded by earls
+and barons. These relaxations preserved in him elasticity of mind,
+without which the greatest genius soon becomes a hack, a plodding piece
+of mechanism, a stupid lump of learned dulness. But he was stained by no
+vices or excesses. He was a man of indefatigable activity, and all his
+labors were in the service of the Crown, to which, as chancellor, he was
+devoted, body and soul.</p>
+
+<p>Is it strange that such a man should have been offered the See of
+Canterbury on the death of Theobald? He had been devoted to his royal
+master and friend; he enjoyed rich livings, and was Archdeacon of
+Canterbury; he had shown no opposition to the royal will. Moreover Henry
+wanted an able man for that exalted post, in order to carry out his
+schemes of making himself independent of priestly influence and papal
+interference.</p>
+
+<p>So Becket was made archbishop and primate of the English Church at the
+age of forty-four, the clergy of the province acquiescing,--perhaps with
+secret complaints, for he was not even priest; merely deacon, and the
+minister of an unscrupulous king. He was ordained priest only just
+before receiving the primacy, and for that purpose.</p>
+
+<p>Nothing in England could exceed the dignity of the See of Canterbury.
+Even the archbishopric of York was subordinate. Becket as metropolitan
+of the English Church was second in rank only to the King himself. He
+could depose any ecclesiastic in the realm. He had the exclusive
+privilege of crowning the king. His decisions were final, except an
+appeal to Rome. No one dared disobey his mandates, for the law of
+clerical obedience was one of the fundamental ideas of the age. Through
+his clergy, over whom his power was absolute, he controlled the people.
+His law courts had cognizance of questions which the royal courts could
+not interfere with. No ecclesiastical dignitary in Europe was his
+superior, except the Pope.</p>
+
+<p>The Archbishop of Canterbury had been a great personage under the Saxon
+kings. Dunstan ruled England as the prime minister of Edward the Martyr,
+but his influence would have been nearly as great had he been merely
+primate of the Church. Nor was the power of the archbishop reduced by
+the Norman kings. William the Conqueror might have made the spiritual
+authority subordinate to the temporal, if he had followed his
+inclinations. But he dared not quarrel with the Pope,--the great
+Hildebrand, by whose favor he was unmolested in the conquest of the
+Saxons. He was on very intimate terms of friendship with Lanfranc, whom
+he made Archbishop of Canterbury,--a wily and ambitious Italian, who was
+devoted to the See of Rome and his spiritual monarch. The influence of
+Hildebrand and Lanfranc combined was too great to be resisted. Nor did
+he attempt resistance; he acquiesced in the necessity of making a king
+of Canterbury. His mind was so deeply absorbed with his conquest and
+other state matters that he did not seem to comprehend the difficulties
+which might arise under his successors, in yielding so much power to the
+primate. Moreover Lanfranc, in the quiet enjoyment of his ecclesiastical
+privileges, gave his powerful assistance in imposing the Norman yoke. He
+filled the great sees with Norman prelates. He does not seem to have had
+much sympathy with the Saxons, or their bishops, who were not so refined
+or intellectual as the bishops of France. The Normans were a superior
+race to the Saxons in executive ability and military enthusiasm. The
+chivalric element of English society, among the higher classes, came
+from the Normans, not from the Saxons. In piety, in passive virtues, in
+sustained industry, in patient toil, in love of personal freedom, the
+Saxons doubtless furnished a finer material for the basis of an
+agricultural, industrial, and commercial nation. The sturdy yeomen of
+England were Saxons: the noble and great administrators were Normans. In
+pride, in ambition, and in executive ability the Normans bore a closer
+resemblance to the old heroic Romans than did the Saxons.</p>
+
+<p>The next archbishop after Lanfranc was Anselm, appointed by William
+Rufus. Anselm was a great scholar, the profoundest of the early
+Schoolmen; a man of meditative habits, who it was presumed would not
+interfere with royal encroachments. William Rufus never dreamed that the
+austere and learned monk, who had spent most of his days in the abbey of
+Bec in devout meditations and scholastic inquiries, would interfere with
+his rapacity. But, as we have already seen, Anselm was conscientious,
+and became the champion of the high-church party in the West. He
+occupied two distinct spheres,--he was absorbed in philosophical
+speculations, yet took an interest in all mundane questions. His resolve
+to oppose the king's usurpations in the spiritual realm caused the
+bitter quarrel already described, which ended in a compromise.</p>
+
+<p>When Henry I. came to the throne, he appointed Theobald, a feeble but
+good man, to the See of Canterbury,--less ambitious than Lanfranc, more
+inoffensive than Anselm; a Norman disinclined to quarrel with his
+sovereign. He died during the reign of Henry II., and this great
+monarch, as we have seen, appointed Becket to the vacant See, thinking
+that in the double capacity of chancellor and archbishop he would be a
+very powerful ally. But he was amazingly deceived in the character of
+his Chancellor. Becket had not sought the office,--the office had sought
+him. It would seem that he accepted it unwillingly. He knew that new
+responsibilities and duties would be imposed upon him, which, if he
+discharged conscientiously like Anselm, would in all probability
+alienate his friend the King, and provoke a desperate contest. And when
+the courtly and luxurious Chancellor held out, in Normandy, the skirts
+of his gilded and embroidered garments to show how unfit he was for an
+archbishop, Henry ought to have perceived that a future estrangement was
+a probability.</p>
+
+<p>Better for Henry had Becket remained in the civil service. But Henry,
+with all his penetration, had not fathomed the mind of his favorite.
+Becket may have been a dissembler, or a great change may have been
+wrought in his character. Probably the new responsibilities imposed upon
+him as Primate of the English Church pressed upon his conscience. He
+knew that supreme allegiance was due to the Pope as head of the Church,
+and that if compelled to choose between the Pope and the King, he must
+obey the Pope. He was ambitious, doubtless; but his subsequent career
+shows that he preferred the liberties of his Church to the temporal
+interests of the sovereign. He was not a theologian, like Lanfranc and
+Anselm. Of all the great characters who preceded him, he most resembles
+Ambrose. Ambrose the governor, and a layman, became Archbishop of Milan.
+Becket the minister of a king, and only deacon, became Archbishop of
+Canterbury. The character of both these great men changed on their
+elevation to high ecclesiastical position. They both became
+high-churchmen, and defended the prerogatives of the clergy. But Ambrose
+was superior to Becket in his zeal to defend the doctrines of the
+Church. It does not appear that Becket took much interest in doctrines.
+In his age there was no dissent. Everybody, outwardly at least, was
+orthodox. In England, certainly, there were no heretics. Had Becket
+remained chancellor, in all probability he would not have quarrelled
+with Henry. As archbishop he knew what was expected of him; and he knew
+also the infamy in store for him should he betray his cause. I do not
+believe he was a hypocrite. Every subsequent act of his life shows his
+sincerity and his devotion to his Church against his own interests.</p>
+
+<p>Becket was no sooner ordained priest and consecrated as archbishop than
+he changed his habits. He became as austere as Lanfranc. He laid aside
+his former ostentation. He clothed himself in sackcloth; he mortified
+his body with fasts and laceration; he associated only with the pious
+and the learned; he frequented the cloisters and places of meditation;
+he received into his palace the needy and the miserable; he washed the
+feet of thirteen beggars every day; he conformed to the standard of
+piety in his age; he called forth the admiration of his attendants by
+his devotion to clerical duties. &quot;He was,&quot; says James Stephen, &quot;a second
+Moses entering the tabernacle at the accepted time for the contemplation
+of his God, and going out from it in order to perform some work of piety
+to his neighbor. He was like one of God's angels on the ladder, whose
+top reached the heavens, now descending to lighten the wants of men, now
+ascending to behold the divine majesty and the splendor of the Heavenly
+One. His prime councillor was reason, which ruled his passions as a
+mistress guides her servants. Under her guidance he was conducted to
+virtue, which, wrapped up in itself, and embracing everything within
+itself, never looks forward for anything additional.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>This is the testimony of his biographer, and has not been explained away
+or denied, although it is probably true that Becket did not purge the
+corruptions of the Church, or punish the disorders and vices of the
+clergy, as Hildebrand did. But I only speak of his private character. I
+admit that he was no reformer. He was simply the high-churchman aiming
+to secure the ascendency of the spiritual power. Becket is not immortal
+for his reforms, or his theological attainments, but for his
+intrepidity, his courage, his devotion to his cause,--a hero, and not a
+man of progress; a man who fought a fight. It should be the aim of an
+historian to show for what he was distinguished; to describe his
+warfare, not to abuse him because he was not a philosopher and reformer.
+He lived in the twelfth century.</p>
+
+<p>One of the first things which opened the eyes of the King was the
+resignation of the Chancellor. The King doubtless made him primate of
+the English hierarchy in order that he might combine both offices. But
+they were incompatible, unless Becket was willing to be the unscrupulous
+tool of the King in everything. Of course Henry could not long remain
+the friend of the man who he thought had duped him. Before a year had
+passed, his friendship was turned to secret but bitter enmity. Nor was
+it long before an event occurred,--a small matter,--which brought the
+King and the Prelate into open collision.</p>
+
+<p>The matter was this: A young nobleman, who held a clerical office,
+committed a murder. As an ecclesiastic, he was brought before the court
+of the Bishop of Lincoln, and was sentenced to pay a small fine. But
+public justice was not satisfied, and the sheriff summoned the canon,
+who refused to plead before him. The matter was referred to the King,
+who insisted that the murderer should be tried in the civil court,--that
+a sacred profession should not screen a man who had committed a crime
+against society. While the King had, as we think, justice on his side,
+yet in this matter he interfered with the jurisdiction of the spiritual
+courts, which had been in force since Constantine. Theodosius and
+Justinian had confirmed the privilege of the Church, on the ground that
+the irregularities of a body of men devoted to the offices of religion
+should be veiled from the common eye; so that ecclesiastics were
+sometimes protected when they should be punished. But if the
+ecclesiastical courts had abuses, they were generally presided over by
+good and wise men,--more learned than the officers of the civil courts,
+and very popular in the Middle Ages; and justice in them was generally
+administered. So much were they valued in a dark age, when the clergy
+were the most learned men of their times, that much business came
+gradually to be transacted in them which previously had been settled in
+the civil courts,--as tithes, testaments, breaches of contract,
+perjuries, and questions pertaining to marriage. But Henry did not like
+these courts, and was determined to weaken their jurisdiction, and
+transfer their power to his own courts, in order to strengthen the royal
+authority. Enlightened jurists and historians in our times here
+sympathize with Henry. High-Church ecclesiastics defend the jurisdiction
+of the spiritual courts, since they upheld the power of the Church, so
+useful in the Middle Ages. The King began the attack where the
+spiritual courts were weakest,--protection afforded to clergymen accused
+of crime. So he assembled a council of bishops and barons to meet him at
+Westminster. The bishops at first were inclined to yield to the King,
+but Becket gained them over, and would make no concession. He stood up
+for the privileges of his order. It was neither justice nor right which
+he defended, but his Church, at all hazards,--not her doctrines, but her
+prerogatives. He would present a barrier against royal encroachments,
+even if they were for the welfare of the realm. He would defend the
+independence of the clergy, and their power,--perhaps as an offset to
+royal power. In his rigid defence of the privileges of the clergy we see
+the churchman, not the statesman; we see the antagonist, not the ally,
+of the King. Henry was of course enraged. Who can wonder? He was bearded
+by his former favorite,--by one of his subjects.</p>
+
+<p>If Becket was narrow, he probably was conscientious. He may have been
+ambitious of wielding unlimited spiritual authority. But it should be
+noted that, had he not quarrelled with the King, he could have been both
+archbishop and chancellor, and in that double capacity wielded more
+power; and had he been disposed to serve his royal master, had he been
+more gentle, the King might not have pushed out his policy of crippling
+the spiritual courts,--might have waived, delayed, or made concessions.
+But now these two great potentates were in open opposition, and a deadly
+warfare was at hand. It is this fight which gives to Becket all his
+historical importance. It is not for me to settle the merits of the
+case, if I could,--only to describe the battle. The lawyers would
+probably take one side, and Catholic priests would take the other, and
+perhaps all high-churchmen. Even men like Mr. Froude and Mr. Freeman,
+both very learned and able, are totally at issue, not merely as to the
+merits of the case, but even as to the facts. Mr. Froude seems to hate
+Becket and all other churchmen as much as Mr. Freeman loves them. I
+think one reason why Mr. Froude exalts so highly Henry VIII. is because
+he put his foot on the clergy and took away their revenues. But with the
+war of partisans I have nothing to do, except the war between Henry II.
+and Thomas Becket.</p>
+
+<p>This war waxed hot when a second council of bishops and barons was
+assembled at Clarendon, near Winchester, to give their assent to certain
+resolutions which the King's judges had prepared in reference to the
+questions at issue, and other things tending to increase the royal
+authority. They are called in history &quot;The Constitutions of Clarendon.&quot;
+The gist and substance of them were, that during the vacancy of any
+bishopric or abbey of royal foundation, the estates were to be in the
+custody of the Crown; that all disputes between laymen and clergymen
+should be tried in the civil courts; that clergymen accused of crime
+should, if the judges decided, be tried in the King's court, and, if
+found guilty, be handed over to the secular arm for punishment; that no
+officer or tenant of the King should be excommunicated without the
+King's consent; that no peasant's son should be ordained without
+permission of his feudal lord; that great ecclesiastical personages
+should not leave the kingdom without the King's consent.</p>
+
+<p>&quot;Anybody must see that these articles were nothing more nor less than
+the surrender of the most important and vital privileges of the Church
+into the hands of the King: not merely her properties, but her
+liberties; even a surrender of the only weapon with which she defended
+herself in extreme cases,--that of excommunication.&quot; It was the virtual
+confiscation of the Church in favor of an aggressive and unscrupulous
+monarch. Could we expect Becket to sign such an agreement, to part with
+his powers, to betray the Church of which he was the first dignitary in
+England? When have men parted with their privileges, except upon
+compulsion? He never would have given up his prerogatives; he never
+meant for a moment to do so. He was not the man for such a base
+submission. Yet he was so worried and threatened by the King, who had
+taken away from him the government of the Prince, his son, and the
+custody of certain castles; he was so importuned by the bishops
+themselves, for fear that the peace of the country would be
+endangered,--that in a weak moment he promised to sign the articles,
+reserving this phrase: &quot;Saving the honor of his order.&quot; With this
+reservation, he thought he could sign the agreement, for he could
+include under such a phrase whatever he pleased.</p>
+
+<p>But when really called to fulfil his promise and sign with his own hand
+those constitutions, he wavered. He burst out in passionate
+self-reproaches for having made a promise he never intended to keep.
+&quot;Never, never!&quot; he said; &quot;I will never do it so long as breath is in my
+body.&quot; In his repentance he mortified himself with new self-expiations.
+He suspended himself from the service of the altar. He was overwhelmed
+with grief, shame, rage, and penitence. He resolved he would not yield
+up the privileges of his order, come what might,--not even if the Pope
+gave him authority to sign.</p>
+
+<p>The dejected and humbled metropolitan advanced to the royal throne with
+downcast eye but unfaltering voice; accused himself of weakness and
+folly, and firmly refused to sign the articles. &quot;Miserable wretch that I
+am,&quot; cried he, with bitter tears coursing down his cheeks, &quot;I see the
+Anglican Church enslaved, in punishment for my sins. But it is all
+right. I was taken from the court, not the cloister, to fill this
+station; from the palace of Caesar, not the school of the Saviour. I
+was a feeder of birds, but suddenly made a feeder of men; a patron of
+stage-players, a follower of hounds, and I became a shepherd over so
+many souls. Surely I am rightly abandoned by God.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>He then took his departure for Canterbury, but was soon summoned to a
+grand council at Northampton, to answer serious charges. He was called
+to account for the sums he had spent as chancellor, and for various
+alleged injustices. He was found guilty by a court controlled by the
+King, and sentenced to pay a heavy fine, which he paid. The next day new
+charges were preferred, and he was condemned to a still heavier fine,
+which he was unable to pay; but he found sureties. On the next day still
+heavier charges were made, and new fines inflicted, which would have
+embarrassed the temporalities of his See. He now perceived that the King
+was bent on his ruin; that the more he yielded the more he would be
+expected to yield. He therefore resolved to yield no further, but to
+stand on his rights.</p>
+
+<p>But before he made his final resistance he armed himself with his
+crozier, and sought counsel from the bishops assembled in another
+chamber of the royal castle. The bishops were divided: some for him,
+some against him. Gilbert Foliot of London put him in mind of the
+benefits he had received from Henry, and the humble condition from which
+he was raised, and advised him to resign for sake of peace. Henry of
+Winchester, a relative of the King, bade him resign. Roger of Worcester
+was non-committal. &quot;If I advise to resist the King, I shall be put out
+of the synagogue,&quot; said he. &quot;I counsel nothing.&quot; The Bishop of
+Chichester declared that Becket was primate no longer, as he had gone
+against the laws of the realm. In the midst of this conference the Earl
+of Leicester entered, and announced the sentence of the peers. Then
+gathering himself up to his full height, the Primate, with austere
+dignity, addressed the Earl and the Bishops: &quot;My brethren, our enemies
+are pressing hard upon us, and the whole world is against us; but I now
+enjoin you, in virtue of your obedience, and in peril of your orders,
+not to be present in any cause which may be made against my person; and
+I appeal to that refuge of the distressed, the Holy See. And I command
+you as your Primate, and in the name of the Pope, to put forth the
+censures of the Church in behalf of your Archbishop, should the secular
+arm lay violent hands upon me; for, be assured, though this frail body
+may yield to persecution,--since all flesh is weak,--yet shall my spirit
+never yield.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>Then pushing his way, he swept through the chamber, reached the
+quadrangle of the palace, mounted his horse, reached his lodgings, gave
+a banquet to some beggars, stole away in disguise and fled, reaching the
+coast in safety, and succeeding in crossing over to Flanders. He was now
+out of the King's power, who doubtless would have imprisoned him and
+perhaps killed him, for he hated him with the intensest hatred. Becket
+had deceived him, having trifled with him by taking an oath to sign the
+Constitutions of Clarendon, and then broken his oath and defied his
+authority, appealing to the Pope, and perhaps involving the King in a
+quarrel with the supreme spiritual power of Christendom. Finally he had
+deserted his post and fled the kingdom. He had defeated the King in his
+most darling schemes.</p>
+
+<p>But although Becket was an exile, a fugitive, and a wanderer, he was
+still Archbishop of Canterbury. He was the head of the English Church,
+and all the clergy of the kingdom owed him spiritual obedience. He still
+had the power of excommunicating the King, and the sole right of
+crowning his successor. If the Pope should take his side, and the King
+of France, and other temporal powers, Becket would be no unequal match
+for the King. It was a grand crisis which Henry comprehended, and he
+therefore sent some of his most powerful barons and prelates to the
+Continent to advance his cause and secure the papal interposition.</p>
+
+<p>Becket did not remain long in Flanders, since the Count was cold and did
+not take his side. He escaped, and sought shelter and aid from the King
+of France.</p>
+
+<p>Louis VII. was a feeble monarch, but he hated Henry II. and admired
+Becket. He took him under his protection, and wrote a letter to the
+Pope in his behalf.</p>
+
+<p>That Pope was Alexander III,--himself an exile, living in Sens, and
+placed in a situation of great difficulty, struggling as he was with an
+anti-pope, and the great Frederic Barbarossa, Emperor of Germany.
+Moreover he was a personal friend of Henry, to whom he had been indebted
+for his elevation to the papal throne. His course, therefore, was
+non-committal and dilatory and vacillating, although he doubtless was on
+the side of the prelate who exalted ecclesiastical authority. But he was
+obliged from policy to be prudent and conciliatory. He patiently heard
+both sides, but decided nothing. All he consented to do was to send
+cardinal legates to England, but intrusted to none but himself the
+prerogatives of final judgment.</p>
+
+<p>After Henry's ambassadors had left, Becket appeared with a splendid
+train of three hundred horsemen, the Archbishop of Rheims, the brothers
+of the King of France, and a long array of bishops. The Pope dared not
+receive him with the warmth he felt, but was courteous, more so than his
+cardinals; and Becket unfolded and discussed the Constitutions of
+Clarendon, which of course found no favor with the Pope. He rebuked
+Becket for his weakness in promising to sign a paper which curtailed so
+fundamentally the privileges of the Church. Some historians affirm he
+did not extend to him the protection he deserved, although he confirmed
+him in his office. He sent him to the hospitable care of the Abbot of
+Pontigny. &quot;Go now,&quot; he said, &quot;and learn what privation is; and in the
+company of Christ's humblest servants subdue the flesh to the spirit.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>In this Cistercian abbey it would seem that Becket lived in great
+austerity, tearing his flesh with his nails, and inflicting on himself
+severe flagellations; so that his health suffered, and his dreams
+haunted him. He was protected, but he could not escape annoyances and
+persecutions. Henry, in his wrath, sequestrated the estates of the
+archbishopric; the incumbents of his benefices were expelled; all his
+relatives and dependents were banished,--some four hundred people; men,
+women, and children. The bishops sent him ironical letters, and hoped
+his fasts would benefit his soul.</p>
+
+<p>The quarrel now was of great interest to all Europe. It was nothing less
+than a battle between the spiritual and temporal powers, like that, a
+century before, between Hildebrand and the Emperor of Germany. Although
+the Pope was obliged from motives of policy,--for fear of being
+deposed,--to seem neutral and attempt to conciliate, still the war
+really was carried on in his behalf. &quot;The great, the terrible, the
+magnificent in the fate of Becket,&quot; says Michelet, &quot;arises from his
+being charged, weak and unassisted, with the interests of the Church
+Universal,--a post which belonged to the Pope himself.&quot; He was still
+Archbishop; but his revenues were cut off, and had it not been for the
+bounty of Louis the King of France, who admired him and respected his
+cause, he might have fared as a simple monk. The Pope allowed him to
+excommunicate the persons who occupied his estates, but not the King
+himself. He feared a revolt of the English Church from papal authority,
+since Henry was supreme in England, and had won over to his cause the
+English bishops. The whole question became complicated and interesting.
+It was the common topic of discourse in all the castles and convents of
+Europe. The Pope, timid and calculating, began to fear he had supported
+Becket too far, and pressed upon him a reconciliation with Henry, much
+to the disgust of Becket, who seemed to comprehend the issue better than
+did the Pope; for the Pope had, in his desire to patch up the quarrel,
+permitted the son of Henry to be crowned by the Archbishop of York,
+which was not only an infringement of the privileges of the Primate, but
+was a blow against the spiritual power. So long as the Archbishop of
+Canterbury had the exclusive privilege of crowning a king, the King was
+dependent in a measure on the Primate, and, through him, on the Pope. At
+this suicidal act on the part of Alexander, Becket lost all patience,
+and wrote to him a letter of blended indignation and reproach. &quot;Why,&quot;
+said he, &quot;lay in my path a stumbling-block? How can you blind yourself
+to the wrong which Christ suffers in me and yourself? And yet you call
+on me, like a hireling, to be silent. I might flourish in power and
+riches and pleasures, and be feared and honored of all; but since the
+Lord hath called me, weak and unworthy as I am, to the oversight of the
+English Church, I prefer proscription, exile, poverty, misery, and
+death, rather than traffic with the liberties of the Church.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>What language to a Pope! What a reproof from a subordinate! How grandly
+the character of Becket looms up here! I say nothing of his cause. It
+may have been a right or a wrong one. Who shall settle whether spiritual
+or temporal power should have the ascendency in the Middle Ages? I speak
+only of his heroism, his fidelity to his cause, his undoubted sincerity.
+Men do not become exiles and martyrs voluntarily, unless they are backed
+by a great cause. Becket may have been haughty, irascible, ambitious.
+Very likely. But what then? The more personal faults he had, the greater
+does his devotion to the interests of the Church appear, fighting as it
+were alone and unassisted. Undaunted, against the advice of his friends,
+unsupported by the Pope, he now hurls his anathemas from his retreat in
+France. He excommunicates the Bishop of Salisbury, and John of Oxford,
+and the Archdeacon of Ilchester, and the Lord Chief-Justice de Luci,
+and everybody who adhered to the Constitutions of Clarendon. The bishops
+of England remonstrate with him, and remind him of his plebeian origin
+and his obligations to the King. To whom he replies: &quot;I am not indeed
+sprung from noble ancestors, but I would rather be the man to whom
+nobility of mind gives the advantages of birth than to be the degenerate
+issue of an illustrious family. David was taken from the sheepfold to be
+a ruler of God's people, and Peter was taken from fishing to be the head
+of the Church. I was born under a humble roof, yet, nevertheless, God
+has intrusted me with the liberties of the Church, which I will guard
+with my latest breath.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>Henry now threatens to confiscate the property of all the Cistercian
+convents in England; and the Abbot of Pontigny, at the command of his
+general, is forced to drive Becket away from his sanctuary. Becket
+retires to Sens, sad at heart and grieved that the excommunications
+which he had inflicted should have been removed by the Pope. Then Louis,
+the King of France, made war on Henry, and took Becket under his
+protection. The Pope rebuked Louis for the war; but Louis retorted by
+telling Alexander that it was a shame for him not to give up his
+time-serving policy. In so doing, Louis spoke out the heart of
+Christendom. The Pope, at last aroused, excommunicated the Archbishop
+of York for crowning the son of Henry, and threatened Henry himself
+with an interdict, and recalled his legates. Becket also fulminated his
+excommunications. There was hardly a prelate or royal chaplain in
+England who was not under ecclesiastical censure. The bishops began to
+waver. Henry had reason to fear he might lose the support of his English
+subjects, and Norman likewise. He could do nothing with the whole Church
+against him.</p>
+
+<p>The King was therefore obliged to compromise. Several times before, he
+had sought reconciliation with his dreadful enemy; but Becket always, in
+his promises, fell back on the phrase, &quot;Saving the honor of his order,&quot;
+or &quot;Saving the honor of God.&quot; But now, amid the fire of
+excommunications, Henry was compelled to make his peace with the man he
+detested. He himself did not much care for the priestly thunderbolts,
+but his clergy and his subjects did. The penalty of eternal fire was a
+dreadful fear to those who believed, as everybody then did, in the hell
+of which the popes were supposed to hold the keys. This fear sustained
+the empire of the popes; it was the basis of sacerdotal rule in the
+Middle Ages. Hence Becket was so powerful, even in exile. His greatness
+was in his character; his power was in his spiritual weapons.</p>
+
+<p>In the hollow reconciliation at last effected between the King and the
+Prelate, Henry promised to confirm Becket in his powers and dignities,
+and molest him no more. But he haughtily refused the customary kiss of
+peace. Becket saw the omen; so did the King of France. The peace was
+inconclusive. It was a truce, not a treaty. Both parties distrusted
+each other.</p>
+
+<p>But Henry was weary with the struggle, and Becket was tired of
+exile,--never pleasant, even if voluntary. Moreover, the Prelate had
+gained the moral victory, even as Hildebrand did when the Emperor of
+Germany stooped as a suppliant in the fortress of Canossa. The King of
+England had virtually yielded to the Archbishop of Canterbury. Perhaps
+Becket felt that his mission was accomplished; that he had done the work
+for which he was raised up. Wearied, sickened with the world, disgusted
+with the Pope, despising his bishops, perhaps he was willing to die. He
+had a presentiment that he should die as a martyr. So had the French
+king and his prelates. But Becket longed to return to his church and
+celebrate the festivities of Christmas. So he made up his mind to return
+to England, &quot;although I know, of a truth,&quot; he said, &quot;I shall meet my
+passion there.&quot; Before embarking he made a friendly and parting visit to
+the King of France, and then rode to the coast with an escort of one
+hundred horsemen. As Dover was guarded by the King's retainers, who
+might harm him, he landed at Sandwich, his own town. The next day he set
+out for Canterbury, after an absence of seven years. The whole
+population lined the road, strewed it with flowers, and rent the air
+with songs. Their beloved Archbishop had returned. On reaching
+Canterbury he went directly to his cathedral and seated himself on his
+throne, and the monks came and kissed him, with tears in their eyes. One
+Herbert said, &quot;Christ has conquered; Christ is now King!&quot;</p>
+
+<p>From Canterbury Becket made a sort of triumphal progress through the
+kingdom, with the pretence of paying a visit to the young king at
+Woodstock,--exciting rather than allaying the causes of discord,
+scattering his excommunications, still haughty, restless, implacable; so
+that the Court became alarmed, and ordered him to return to his diocese.
+He obeyed, as he wished to celebrate Christmas at home; and ascending
+his long-neglected pulpit preached, according to Michelet, from this
+singular text: &quot;I am come to die in the midst of you.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>Henry at this time was on the Continent, and was greatly annoyed at the
+reports of Becket's conduct which reached him. Then there arrived three
+bishops whom the Primate had excommunicated, with renewed complaints and
+grievances, assuring him there would be no peace so long as Becket
+lived. Henry was almost wild with rage and perplexity. What could he do?
+He dared not execute the Archbishop, as Henry VIII. would have done. In
+his age the Prelate was almost as powerful as the King. Violence to his
+person was the last thing to do, for this would have involved the King
+in war with the adherents of the Pope, and would have entailed an
+excommunication. Still, the supremest desire of Henry's soul was to get
+Becket out of the way. So, yielding to an impulse of passion, he said to
+his attendants, &quot;Is there no one to relieve me from the insults of this
+low-born and turbulent priest?&quot;</p>
+
+<p>Among these attendants were four courtiers or knights, of high birth and
+large estates, who, hearing these reproachful words, left the court at
+once, crossed the channel, and repaired to the castle of Sir Ranulf de
+Broc, the great enemy of Becket, who had molested him in innumerable
+ways. Some friendly person contrived to acquaint Becket with his danger,
+to whom he paid no heed, knowing it very well himself. He knew he was to
+die; and resolved to die bravely.</p>
+
+<p>The four armed knights, meanwhile, on the 29th of December, rode with an
+escort to Canterbury, dined at the Augustinian abbey, and entered the
+court-yard of the Archbishop's palace as Becket had finished his mid-day
+meal and had retired to an inner room with his chaplain and a few
+intimate friends. They then entered the hall and sought the Archbishop,
+who received them in silence. Sir Reginald Fitzurst then broke the
+silence with these words: &quot;We bring you the commands of the King beyond
+the sea, that you repair without delay to the young King's presence and
+swear allegiance. And further, he commands you to absolve the bishops
+you have excommunicated.&quot; On Becket's refusal, the knight continued:
+&quot;Since you will not obey, the royal command is that you and your clergy
+forthwith depart from the realm, never more to return.&quot; Becket angrily
+declared he would never again leave England. The knights then sprang to
+their feet and departed, enjoining the attendants to prevent the escape
+of Becket, who exclaimed: &quot;Do you think I shall fly, then? Neither for
+the King nor any living man will I fly. You cannot be more ready to kill
+me than I am to die.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>He sought, however, the shelter of his cathedral, as the vesper bell
+summoned him to prayers,--followed by the armed knights, with a company
+of men-at-arms, driving before them a crowd of monks. The Archbishop was
+standing on the steps of the choir, beyond the central pillar, which
+reached to the roof of the cathedral, in the dim light shed by the
+candles of the altars, so that only the outline of his noble figure
+could be seen, when the knights closed around him, and Fitzurst seized
+him,--perhaps meaning to drag him away as a prisoner to the King, or
+outside the church before despatching him. Becket cried, &quot;Touch me not,
+thou abominable wretch!&quot; at the same time hurling Tracy, another of the
+knights, to the ground, who, rising, wounded him in the head with his
+sword. The Archbishop then bent his neck to the assassins, exclaiming,
+&quot;I am prepared to die for Christ and His Church.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>Such was the murder of Becket,--a martyr, as he has been generally
+regarded, for the liberties of the Church; but, according to some,
+justly punished for presumptuous opposition to his sovereign.</p>
+
+<p>The assassination was a shock to Christendom. The most intrepid
+churchman of his age was slain at his post for doing, as he believed,
+his duty. No one felt the shock more than the King himself, who knew he
+would be held responsible for the murder. He dreaded the consequences,
+and shut himself up for three days in his chamber, refusing food,
+issuing orders for the arrest of the murderers, and sending ambassadors
+to the Pope to exculpate himself. Fearing an excommunication and an
+interdict, he swore on the Gospel, in one of the Norman cathedrals, that
+he had not commanded nor desired the death of the Archbishop; and
+stipulated to maintain at his own cost two hundred knights in the Holy
+Land, to abrogate the Constitutions of Clarendon, to reinvest the See of
+Canterbury with all he had wrested away, and even to undertake a crusade
+against the Saracens of Spain if the Pope desired. Amid the calamities
+which saddened his latter days, he felt that all were the judgments of
+God for his persecution of the martyr, and did penance at his tomb.</p>
+
+<p>So Becket slew more by his death than he did by his life. His cause was
+gained by his blood: it arrested the encroachments of the Norman kings
+for more than three hundred years. He gained the gratitude of the Church
+and a martyr's crown. He was canonized as a saint. His shrine was
+enriched with princely offerings beyond any other object of popular
+veneration in the Middle Ages. Till the time of the Reformation a
+pilgrimage to that shrine was a common form of penance for people of all
+conditions, and was supposed to expiate their sins. Even miracles were
+reputed to be wrought at that shrine, while a drop of Becket's blood
+would purchase a domain!</p>
+
+<p>Whatever may be said about the cause of Becket, to which there are two
+sides, there is no doubt about his popularity. Even the Reformation, and
+the changes made in the English Constitution, have not obliterated the
+veneration in which he was held for five hundred years. You cannot
+destroy respect for a man who is willing to be a martyr, whether his
+cause is right or wrong. If enlightened judgments declare that he was &quot;a
+martyr of sacerdotal power, not of Christianity; of a caste, and not of
+mankind;&quot; that he struggled for the authority and privileges of the
+clergy rather than for the good of his country,--still it will be
+conceded that he fought bravely and died with dignity. All people love
+heroism. They are inclined to worship heroes; and especially when an
+unarmed priest dares to resist an unscrupulous and rapacious king, as
+Henry is well known to have been, and succeeds in tearing from his hands
+the spoils he has seized, there must be admiration. You cannot
+extinguish the tribute of the soul for heroism, any more than that of
+the mind for genius. The historian who seeks to pull down a hero from
+the pedestal on which he has been seated for ages plays a losing game.
+No brilliancy in sophistical pleadings can make men long prefer what is
+<i>new</i> to that which is <i>true</i>. Becket is enshrined in the hearts of his
+countrymen, even as Cromwell is among the descendants of the Puritans;
+and substantially for the same reason,--because they both fought bravely
+for their respective causes,--the cause of the people in their
+respective ages. Both recognized God Almighty, and both contended
+against the despotism of kings seeking to be absolute, and in behalf of
+the people who were ground down by military power. In the twelfth
+century the people looked up to the clergy as their deliverers and
+friends; in the seventeenth century to parliaments and lawyers. Becket
+was the champion of the clergy, even as Cromwell was the champion--at
+least at first--of the Parliament. Carlyle eulogizes Cromwell as much as
+Froude abuses Becket; but Becket, if more haughty and repulsive than
+Cromwell in his private character, yet was truer to his principles. He
+was a great hero, faithful to a great cause, as he regarded it, however
+averse this age may justly be to priestly domination. He must be judged
+by the standard which good and enlightened people adopted seven hundred
+years ago,--not in semi-barbarous England alone, but throughout the
+continent of Europe. This is not the standard which reason accepts
+to-day, I grant; but it is the standard by which Becket must be
+judged,--even as the standard which justified the encroachments of Leo
+the Great, or the rigorous rule of Tiberius and Marcus Aurelius, is not
+that which enthrones Gustavus Adolphus and William of Orange in the
+heart of the civilized world.</p>
+
+<p>AUTHORITIES.</p>
+
+<p>Eadmer's Life of Anselm; Historia Novarum; Sir J. Stephen's Life of
+Becket, of William of Malmsbury, and of Henry of Huntington;
+Correspondence of Thomas Becket, with that of Foliot, Bishop of London,
+and John of Salisbury; Chronicle of Peter of Peterborough; Chronicle of
+Ralph Niper, and that of Jocelyn of Brakeland; Dugdale's Monasticon;
+Freeman's Norman Conquest; Michelet's History of France; Green, Hume,
+Knight, Stubbs, among the English historians; Encyclopaedia Britannica;
+Hook's Lives of the Archbishops of Canterbury; Lord Littleton on Henry
+II.; Stanley's Memorials of Canterbury; Milman's Latin Christianity;
+article by Froude; Morris's Life of Thomas &agrave; Becket; J. Craigie
+Robertson's Life of Thomas Becket.</p>
+
+
+<br><br><hr style="width: 35%;"><br><br>
+<h2><a name="THE_FEUDAL_SYSTEM."></a>THE FEUDAL SYSTEM.</h2>
+
+<hr style="width: 25%;">
+
+<p>ABOUT A.D. 800-1300.</p>
+
+<p>There is no great character with whom Feudalism is especially
+identified. It was an institution of the Middle Ages, which grew out of
+the miseries and robberies that succeeded the fall of the Roman Empire.</p>
+
+<p>Before I present the mutual relation between a lord and his vassal, I
+would call your attention to political anarchies ending in political
+degradation; to an unformed state of society; to semi-barbarism, with
+its characteristic vices of plunder, rapine, oppression, and injustice;
+to wild and violent passions, unchecked by law; to the absence of
+central power; to the reign of hard and martial nobles; to the miseries
+of the people, ground down, ignorant, and brutal; to rude agricultural
+life; to petty wars; to general ignorance, which kept society in
+darkness and gloom for a thousand years,--all growing out of the eclipse
+of the old civilization, so that the European nations began a new
+existence, and toiled in sorrow and fear, with few ameliorations: an
+iron age, yet an age which was not unfavorable for the development of
+new virtues and heroic qualities, under the influence of which society
+emerged from barbarism, with a new foundation for national greatness,
+and a new material for Christianity and art and literature and science
+to work upon.</p>
+
+<p>Such was the state of society during the existence of feudal
+institutions,--a period of about five hundred years,--dating from the
+dismemberment of Charlemagne's empire to the fifteenth century. The era
+of its greatest power was from the Norman conquest of England to the
+reign of Edward III. But there was a long and gloomy period before
+Feudalism ripened into an institution,--from the dissolution of the
+Roman Empire to the eighth and ninth centuries. I would assign this
+period as the darkest and the dreariest in the history of Europe since
+the Roman conquests, for this reason,--that civilization perished
+without any one to chronicle the changes, or to take notice of the
+extinction.</p>
+
+<p>From Charlemagne there had been, with the exception of brief intervals,
+the birth of new ideas and interests, the growth of a new civilization.
+Before his day there was a progressive decline. Art, literature,
+science, alike faded away. There were no grand monuments erected, the
+voice of the poet was unheard in the universal wretchedness, the monks
+completed the destruction which the barbarians began. Why were libraries
+burned or destroyed? Why was classic literature utterly neglected? Why
+did no great scholars arise, even in the Church? The new races looked in
+vain for benefactors. Even the souvenirs of the old Empire were lost.
+Nearly all the records of ancient greatness perished. The old cities
+were levelled to the ground. Nothing was built but monasteries, and
+these were as gloomy as feudal castles at a later date. The churches
+were heavy and mournful. Good men hid themselves, trying to escape from
+the miserable world, and sang monotonous chants of death and the grave.
+Agriculture was at the lowest state, and hunting, piracy, and robbery
+were resorted to as a means of precarious existence. There was no
+commerce. The roads were invested with vagabonds and robbers. It was the
+era of universal pillage and destruction. Nothing was sacred. Universal
+desolation filled the souls of men with despair. What state of society
+could be worse than that of England under the early Saxon kings? There
+were no dominant races and no central power. The countries of Europe
+relapsed into a sullen barbarism. I see no bright spot anywhere, not
+even in Italy, which was at this time the most overrun and the most
+mercilessly plundered of all the provinces of the fallen Empire. The old
+capital of the world was nearly depopulated. Nothing was spared of
+ancient art on which the barbarians could lay their hands, and nothing
+was valued.</p>
+
+<p>This was the period of what writers call <i>allodial</i> tenure, in
+distinction from feudal. The allodialist owned indeed his lands, but
+they were subject to incessant depredations from wandering tribes of
+barbarians and from robbers. There was no encouragement to till the
+soil. There was no incentive to industry of any kind. During a reign of
+universal lawlessness, what man would work except for a scanty and
+precarious support? His cattle might be driven away, his crops seized,
+his house plundered. It is hard to realize that our remote ancestors
+were mere barbarians, who by the force of numbers overran the world.
+They seem to have had but one class of virtues,---contempt of death, and
+the willing sacrifice of their lives in battle. The allodialist,
+however, was not a barbaric warrior or chieftain, but the despoiled
+owner of lands that his ancestors had once cultivated in peace and
+prosperity. He was the degenerate descendant of Celtic and Roman
+citizens, the victim of barbaric spoliations. His lands may have passed
+into the hands of the Gothic conquerors; but the Gothic or Burgundian or
+Frankish possessor of innumerable acres, once tilled by peaceful
+citizens, remained an allodial proprietor. Even he had no protection and
+no safety; for any new excursion of less fortunate barbarians would
+desolate his possessions and decimate his laborers. The small proprietor
+was especially subject to pillage and murder.</p>
+
+<p>In the universal despair from this reign of anarchy and lawlessness,
+when there was no security to property and no redress of evils, the
+allodialist parted with his lands to some powerful chieftain, and
+obtained promise of protection. He even resigned the privilege of
+freedom to save his wretched life. He became a serf,--a semi-bondman,
+chained to the soil, but protected from outrage. Nothing but
+inconceivable miseries, which have not been painted by historians, can
+account for the almost simultaneous change in the ownership of land in
+all European countries. We can conceive of nothing but blank despair
+among the people who attempted to cultivate land. And there must have
+been the grossest ignorance and the lowest degradation when men were
+willing to submit to the curtailment of personal freedom and the loss of
+their lands, in order to find protectors.</p>
+
+<p>Thus Feudalism arose in the ninth and tenth centuries from the absolute
+wreck of property and hopes. It was virtually the surrender of land for
+the promise of protection. It was the great necessity of that anarchical
+age. Like all institutions, it grew out of the needs of the times. Yet
+its universal acceptance seems to prove that the change was beneficial.
+Feudalism, especially in its early ages, is not to be judged by the
+institutions of our times, any more than is the enormous growth of
+spiritual power which took place when this social and political
+revolution was going on. Wars and devastations and untold calamities and
+brutal forces were the natural sequence of barbaric invasions, and of
+the progressive fall of the old civilization, continued from generation
+to generation for a period of two or three hundred years, with scarcely
+any interruption. You get no relief from such a dispensation of Divine
+Providence, unless you can solve the question why the Roman Empire was
+permitted to be swept away. If it must be destroyed, from the prevalence
+of the same vices which have uniformly undermined all empires,--utter
+and unspeakable rottenness and depravity,--in spite of Christianity,
+whether nominal or real; if eternal justice must bear sway on this
+earth, bringing its fearful retributions for the abuse of privileges and
+general wickedness,--then we accept the natural effects of that violence
+which consummated the ruin. The natural consequences of two hundred
+years of pillage and warfare and destruction of ancient institutions
+were, and could have been nothing other than, miseries, misrule,
+sufferings, poverty, insecurity, and despair. A universal conflagration
+must destroy everything that past ages had valued. As a relief from what
+was felt to be intolerable, and by men who were brutal, ignorant,
+superstitious, and degraded, all from the effect of the necessary evils
+which war creates, a sort of semi-slavery was felt to be preferable, as
+the price of dependence and protection.</p>
+
+<p>Dependence and protection are the elemental principles of Feudalism.
+These were the hard necessities which the age demanded. And for three
+hundred years, it cannot be doubted, the relation between master and
+serf was beneficial. It resulted in a more peaceful state of
+society,--not free from great evils, but still a healthful change from
+the disorders of the preceding epoch. The peasant could cultivate his
+land comparatively free from molestation. He was still poor. Sometimes
+he was exposed to heavy exactions. He was bound to give a portion of the
+profits of his land to his lordly proprietor; and he was bound to render
+services in war. But, as he was not bound to serve over forty days, he
+was not led on distant expeditions; he was not carried far from home. He
+was not exposed to the ambition of military leaders. His warlike
+services seem to be confined to the protection of his master's castle
+and family, or to the assault of some neighboring castle. He was simply
+made to participate in baronial quarrels; and as these quarrels were
+frequent, his life was not altogether peaceful.</p>
+
+<p>But war on a large scale was impossible in the feudal age. The military
+glory of the Roman conquerors was unknown, and also that of modern
+European monarchs. The peasant was bound to serve under the banner of a
+military chieftain only for a short time: then he returned to his farm.
+His great military weapon was the bow,--the weapon of semi-barbarians.
+The spear, the sword, the battle-axe were the weapons of the baronial
+family,--the weapons of knights, who fought on horseback, cased in
+defensive armor. The peasant fought on foot; and as the tactics of
+ancient warfare were inapplicable, and those of modern warfare unknown,
+the strength of armies was in cavalry and not in the infantry, as in
+modern times. But armies were not large from the ninth to the twelfth
+century,--not until the Crusades arose. Nor were they subject to a rigid
+discipline. They were simply an armed rabble. They were more like
+militia than regular forces; they fostered military virtues, without the
+demoralization of standing armies. In the feudal age there were no
+standing armies. Even at so late a period as the time of Queen Elizabeth
+that sovereign had to depend on the militia for the defence of the realm
+against the Spaniards. Standing armies are the invention of great
+military monarchs or a great military State. The bow and arrow were used
+equally to shoot men and shoot deer; but they rarely penetrated the
+armor of knights, or their force was broken by the heavy shield: they
+took effect only on the undefended bodies of the peasantry. Hence there
+was a great disproportion of the slain in battle between peasants and
+their mounted masters. War, even when confined to a small sphere, has
+its terrors. The sufferers were the common people, whose lives were not
+held of much account. History largely confines itself to battles. Hence
+we are apt to lose sight of the uneventful life of the people in
+quiet times.</p>
+
+<p>But the barons were not always fighting. In the intervals of war the
+peasant enjoyed the rude pleasures of his home. He grew up with strong
+attachments, having no desire to migrate or travel. Gradually the
+sentiment of loyalty was born,--loyalty to his master and to his
+country. His life was rough, but earnest. He had great simplicity of
+character. He became honest, industrious, and frugal. He was contented
+with but few pleasures,--rural f&ecirc;tes and village holidays. He had no
+luxuries and no craving for them. Measured by our modern scale of
+pleasures he led a very inglorious, unambitious, and rude life.</p>
+
+<p>Contentment is one of the mysteries of existence. We should naturally
+think that excitement and pleasure and knowledge would make people
+happy, since they stimulate the intellectual powers; but on the contrary
+they seem to produce unrest and cravings which are never satisfied. And
+we should naturally think that a life of isolation, especially with no
+mental resources,--a hard rural existence, with but few comforts and no
+luxuries,--would make people discontented. Yet it does not seem to be so
+in fact, as illustrated by the apparent contentment of people doomed to
+hard labor in the most retired and dreary retreats. We wonder at their
+placitude, as we travel in remote and obscure sections of the country. A
+poor farmer, whose house is scarcely better than a hovel, surrounded
+with chickens and pigs, and with only a small garden,--unadorned and
+lonely and repulsive,--has no cravings which make the life of the
+favored rich sometimes unendurable. The poorer he is, and therefore the
+more miserable as we should think, the more contented he seems to be;
+while a fashionable woman or <i>ennuied</i> man, both accustomed to the
+luxuries and follies of city life, with all its refinements and
+gratification of intellectual and social pleasures, will sometimes pine
+in a suburban home, with all the gilded glories of rich furniture,
+books, beautiful gardens, greenhouses, luxurious living, horses,
+carriages, and everything that wealth can furnish.</p>
+
+<p>So that civilization would seem often a bitter mockery, showing that
+intellectual life only stimulates the cravings of the soul, but does not
+satisfy them. And when people are poor but cultivated, the unhappiness
+seems to be still greater; demonstrating that cultivated intellect alone
+opens to the mind the existence of evils which are intensified by the
+difficulty of their removal, and on which the mind dwells with feelings
+kindred to despair. I have sometimes doubted whether an obscure farmer's
+daughter is any happier with her piano, and her piles of cheaply
+illustrated literature and translations of French novels, and her
+smatterings of science learned in normal schools, since she has learned
+too often to despise her father and mother and brother, and her
+uneducated rural beau, and all her surroundings, with poverty and unrest
+and aspiration for society eating out her soul. The happiness produced
+merely by intellectual pleasures and social frivolities is very small at
+the best, compared with that produced by the virtues of the heart and
+the affections kindled by deeds of devotion, or the duties which take
+the mind from itself. Intellectual pleasures give only a brief
+satisfaction, unless directed to a practical end, like the earnest
+imparting of knowledge in educational pursuits, or the pursuit of art
+for itself alone,--to create, and not to devour, as the epicure eats his
+dinner. Where is the happiness of devouring books with no attempt to
+profit by them, except in the temporary pleasure of satisfying an
+appetite? So even the highest means of happiness may become a savor of
+death unto death when perverted or unimproved. Never should we stimulate
+the intellect merely to feed upon itself. Unless intellectual culture is
+directed to what is useful, especially to the necessities or improvement
+of others, it is a delusion and a snare. Better far to be ignorant, but
+industrious and useful in any calling however humble, than to cram the
+mind with knowledge that leads to no good practical result. The buxom
+maiden of rural life, in former days absorbed in the duties of home,
+with no knowledge except that gained in a district school in the winter,
+with all her genial humanities in the society of equals no more aspiring
+than herself, is to me a far more interesting person than the
+pale-faced, languid, discontented, envious girl who has just returned
+from a school beyond her father's means, even if she can play upon an
+instrument, and has worn herself thin in exhausting studies under the
+stimulus of ambitious competition, or the harangues of a pedant who
+thinks what he calls &quot;education&quot; to be the end of life,--an education
+which reveals her own insignificance, or leads her to strive for an
+unattainable position.</p>
+
+<p>I am forced to make these remarks to show that the Mediaeval peasant was
+not necessarily miserable because he was ignorant, or isolated, or poor.
+In so doing I may excite the wrath of some who think a little knowledge
+is <i>not</i> a dangerous thing, and may appear to be throwing cold water on
+one of the noblest endeavors of modern times. But I do not sneer at
+education. I only seek to show that it will not make people happy,
+unless it is directed into useful channels; and that even ignorance may
+be bliss when it is folly to be wise. A benevolent Providence tempers
+all conditions to the necessities of the times. The peasantry of Europe
+became earnest and stalwart warriors and farmers, even under the
+grinding despotism of feudal masters. With their beer and brown bread,
+and a fowl in the pot on a Sunday, they grew up to be hardy, bold,
+strong, healthy, and industrious. They furnished a material on which
+Christianity and a future civilization could work. They became
+patriotic, religious, and kind-hearted. They learned to bear their evils
+in patience. They were more cheerful than the laboring classes of our
+day, with their partial education,--although we may console ourselves
+with the reflection that these are passing through the fermenting
+processes of a transition from a lower to a higher grade of living. Look
+at the picture of them which art has handed down: their faces are ruddy,
+genial, sympathetic, although coarse and vulgar and boorish. And they
+learned to accept the inequalities of life without repining insolence.
+They were humble, and felt that there were actually some people in the
+world superior to themselves. I do not paint their condition as
+desirable or interesting by our standard, but as endurable. They were
+doubtless very ignorant; but would knowledge have made them any happier?
+Knowledge is for those who can climb by it to positions of honor and
+usefulness, not for those who cannot rise above the condition in which
+they were born,--not for those who will be snubbed and humiliated and
+put down by arrogant wealth and birth. Better be unconscious of
+suffering, than conscious of wrongs which cannot be redressed.</p>
+
+<p>Let no one here misunderstand and pervert me. I am not exalting the
+ignorance and brutality of the feudal ages. I am not decrying the
+superior advantages of our modern times. I only state that ignorance and
+brutality were the necessary sequences of the wars and disorders of a
+preceding epoch, but that this very ignorance and brutality were
+accompanied by virtues which partially ameliorated the evils of the day;
+that in the despair of slavery were the hopes of future happiness; that
+religion took a deep hold of the human mind, even though blended with
+puerile and degrading superstitions; that Christianity, taking hold of
+the hearts of a suffering people, taught lessons which enabled them to
+bear their hardships with resignation; that cheerfulness was not
+extinguished; and that so many virtues were generated by the combined
+influence of suffering and Christianity, that even with ignorance human
+nature shone with greater lustre than among those by whom knowledge is
+perverted. It was not until the evil and injustice of Feudalism were
+exposed by political writers, and were meditated upon by the people who
+had arisen by education and knowledge, that they became unendurable; and
+then the people shook off the yoke. But how impossible would have been a
+French Revolution in the thirteenth century! What readers would a
+Rousseau have found among the people in the time of Louis VII.? If
+knowledge breaks fetters when the people are strong enough to shake them
+off, ignorance enables them to bear those fetters when emancipation is
+impossible.</p>
+
+<p>The great empire of Charlemagne was divided at his death (in A.D. 814)
+among his three sons,--one of whom had France, another Italy, and the
+third Germany. In forty-five years afterwards we find seven kingdoms,
+instead of three,--France, Navarre, Provence, Burgundy, Lorraine,
+Germany, and Italy. In a few years more there were twenty-nine
+hereditary fiefs. And as early as the tenth century France itself was
+split up into fifty-five independent sovereignties; and these small
+sovereignties were again divided into dukedoms and baronies. All these
+dukes and barons, however, acknowledged the King of France as their
+liege lord; yet he was not richer or more powerful than some of the
+dukes who swore fealty to him. The Duke of Burgundy at one time had
+larger territories and more power than the King of France himself. So
+that the central authority of kings was merely nominal; their power
+extended scarcely beyond the lands they individually controlled. And all
+the countries of Europe were equally ruled by petty kings. The kings of
+England seem to have centralized around their thrones more power than
+other European monarchs until the time of the Crusades, when they were
+checked, not so much by nobles as by Act of Parliament.</p>
+
+<p>Now all Europe was virtually divided among these petty sovereigns,
+called dukes, earls, counts, and barons. Each one was virtually
+independent. He coined money, administered justice, and preserved order.
+He ruled by hereditary right, and his estate descended to his oldest
+son. His revenues were derived by the extorted contributions of those
+who cultivated his lands, and by certain perquisites, among which were
+the privilege of wardship, and the profits of an estate during the
+minority of its possessor, and reliefs, or fines paid on the alienation
+of a vassal's feud; and the lord could bestow a female ward in marriage
+on whomever he pleased, and on her refusal take possession of
+her estate.</p>
+
+<p>These lordly proprietors of great estates,--or nobles,--so powerful and
+independent, lived in castles. These strongholds were necessary in such
+turbulent times. They were large or small, according to the wealth or
+rank of the nobles who occupied them, but of no architectural beauty.
+They were fortresses, generally built on hills, or cragged rocks, or in
+inaccessible marshes, or on islands in rivers,--anywhere where defence
+was easiest. The nobles did not think of beautiful situations, or
+fruitful meadows, so much as of the safety and independence of the
+feudal family. They therefore lived in great isolation, travelling but
+little, and only at short distances (it was the higher clergy only who
+travelled). Though born to rank and power, they were yet rude, rough,
+unpolished. They were warriors. They fought on horseback, covered with
+defensive armor. They were greedy and quarrelsome, and hence were
+engaged in perpetual strife,--in the assault on castles and devastation
+of lands. These castles were generally gloomy, heavy, and uncomfortable,
+yet were very numerous in the eleventh and twelfth centuries. They were
+occupied by the feudal family, perhaps the chaplain, strangers of rank,
+bards, minstrels, and servants, who lived on the best the country
+afforded, but without the luxuries of our times. They lived better than
+the monks, as they had no vows to restrain them. But in their dreary
+castles the rooms were necessarily small, dark, and damp, except the
+banqueting hall. They were poorly lighted, there being no glass in the
+narrow windows, nor chimneys, nor carpets, nor mirrors, nor luxurious
+furniture, nor crockery, nor glassware, nor stoves, nor the refinements
+of cookery. The few roads of the country were travelled only by
+horsemen, or people on foot. There were no carriages, only a few heavy
+lumbering wagons. Tea and coffee were unknown, as also tropical fruits
+and some of our best vegetables. But game of all kinds was plenty and
+cheap; so also were wine and beer, and beef and mutton, and pork and
+poultry. The feudal family was illiterate, and read but few books. The
+chief pleasures were those of the chase,--hunting and hawking,--and
+intemperate feasts. What we call &quot;society&quot; was impossible, although the
+barons may have exchanged visits with each other. They rarely visited
+cities, which at that time were small and uninteresting. The lordly
+proprietor of ten thousand acres may have been jolly, frank, and
+convivial, but he was still rough, and had little to say on matters of
+great interests. Circumscribed he was of necessity, ignorant and
+prejudiced. Conscious of power, however, he was proud and insolent to
+inferiors. He was merely a physical man,--ruddy, healthy, strong indeed,
+but without refinement, or knowledge, or social graces. His castle was a
+fort and not a palace; and here he lived with boisterous or sullen
+companions, as rough and ignorant as himself. His wife and daughters
+were more interesting, but without those attainments which grace and
+adorn society. They made tapestries and embroideries, and rode
+horseback, and danced well, and were virtuous; but were primitive,
+uneducated, and supercilious. Their beauty was of the ruddy sort,
+--physical, but genial. They were very fond of ornaments and gay
+dresses; and so were their lords on festive occasions, for
+semi-barbarism delights in what is showy and glittering,--purple, and
+feathers, and trinkets.</p>
+
+<p>Feudalism was intensely aristocratic. A line was drawn between the
+noble and ignoble classes almost as broad as that which separates
+liberty from slavery. It was next to impossible for a peasant, or
+artisan, or even a merchant to pass that line. The exclusiveness of the
+noble class was intolerable. It held in scorn any profession but arms;
+neither riches nor learning was of any account. It gloried in the pride
+of birth, and nourished a haughty scorn of plebeian prosperity. It was
+not until cities and arts and commerce arose that the arrogance of the
+baron was rebuked, or his iron power broken. Haughty though ignorant, he
+had no pity or compassion for the poor and miserable. His peasantry were
+doomed to perpetual insults. Their cornfields were trodden down by the
+baronial hunters; they were compelled even to grind their corn in the
+landlord's mill, and bake their bread in his oven. They had no redress
+of injuries, and were scorned as well as insulted. What knight would arm
+himself for them; what gentle lady wept at their sorrows? The feeling of
+personal consequence was entirely confined to the feudal family. The
+poorest knight took precedence over the richest merchant. Pride of birth
+was carried to romantic extravagance, so that marriages seldom took
+place between different classes. A beautiful peasant girl could never
+rise above her drudgeries; and she never dreamed of rising, for the
+members of the baronial family were looked up to as superior beings. A
+caste grew up as rigid and exclusive as that of India. The noble and
+ignoble classes were not connected by any ties; there was nothing in
+common between them. Even the glory of successful warfare shed no
+radiance on a peasant's hut. He fought for his master, and not for
+himself, and scarcely for his country. He belonged to his master as
+completely as if he could be bought and sold. Christianity teaches the
+idea of a universal brotherhood; Feudalism suppressed or extinguished
+it. Peasants had no rights, only duties,--and duties to hard and
+unsympathetic masters. Can we wonder that a relation so unequal should
+have been detested by the people when they began to think? Can we wonder
+it should have created French Revolutions? When we remember how the
+people toiled for a mail-clad warrior, how they fought for his
+interests, how they died for his renown, how they were curtailed in
+their few pleasures, how they were not permitted even to shoot a
+pheasant or hare in their own grounds, we are amazed that such signal
+injustice should ever have been endured. It is impossible that this
+injustice should not have been felt; and no man ever became reconciled
+to injustice, unless reduced to the condition of a brute. Religious
+tyranny may be borne, for the priest invokes a supreme authority which
+all feel to be universally binding. But all tyranny over the body--the
+utter extinction of liberty--is hateful even to the most degraded
+Hottentot.</p>
+
+<p>Why, then, was such an unjust and unequal relation permitted to exist
+so long? What good did it accomplish? What were its extenuating
+features? Why was it commended by historians as a good institution for
+the times?</p>
+
+<p>It created a hardy agricultural class, inured them to the dangers and
+the toils of war, bound them by local attachments, and fostered a
+patriotic spirit. It developed the virtues of obedience, and submission
+to evils. It created a love of home and household duties. It was
+favorable to female virtue. It created the stout yeomanry who could be
+relied upon in danger. It made law and order possible. It defended the
+people from robbers. It laid a foundation for warlike prowess. It was
+favorable to growth of population, for war did not sweep off the people
+so much as those dire plagues and pestilences which were common in the
+Middle Ages. It was preferable to the disorders and conflagrations and
+depredations of preceding times. The poor man was oppressed, but he was
+safe so long as his lord could protect him. It was a hard discipline,
+but a discipline which was healthy; it preserved the seed if it did not
+bear the fruits of civilization. The peasantry became honest, earnest,
+sincere. They were made susceptible of religious impressions. They
+became attached to all the institutions of the Church; the parish church
+was their retreat, their consolation, and their joy. The priest
+tyrannized over the soul and the knight over the body, but the flame of
+piety burned steadily and warmly.</p>
+
+<p>When the need of such an institution as Feudalism no longer existed,
+then it was broken up. Its blessings were not commensurate with its
+evils; but the evils were less than those which previously existed. This
+is, I grant, but faint praise. But the progress of society could not be
+rapid amid such universal ignorance: it is slow in the best of times. I
+do not call that state of society progressive where moral and spiritual
+truths are forgotten or disregarded in the triumphs of a brilliant
+material life. There was no progress of society from the Antonines to
+Theodosius, but a steady decline. But there was a progress, however
+slow, from Charlemagne to Philip Augustus. But for Feudalism and
+ecclesiastical institutions the European races might not have emerged
+from anarchy, or might have been subjected to a new and withering
+imperialism. Say what we will of the grinding despotism of
+Feudalism,--and we cannot be too severe on any form of despotism,--yet
+the rude barbarian became a citizen in process of time, with education
+and political rights.</p>
+
+<p>Society made the same sort of advance, in the gloomy epoch we are
+reviewing, that the slaves in our Southern States made from the time
+they were imported from Africa, with their degrading fetichism and
+unexampled ignorance, to the time of their emancipation. How marked the
+progress of the Southern slaves during the two hundred years of their
+bondage! No degraded race ever made so marked a progress as they did in
+the same period, even under all the withering influences of slavery.
+Probably their moral and spiritual progress was greater than it will be
+in the next two hundred years, exposed to all the dangers of modern
+materialism, which saps the life of nations in the midst of the most
+brilliant triumphs of art. We are now on the road to a marvellous
+intellectual enlightenment, unprecedented and full of encouragement. But
+with this we face dangers also, such as undermined the old Roman world
+and all the ancient civilizations. If I could fix my eye on a single
+State or Nation in the whole history of our humanity that has escaped
+these dangers, that has not retrograded in those virtues on which the
+strength of man is based, after a certain point has been reached in
+civilization, I would not hazard this remark. Society escaped these
+evils in that agricultural period which saw the rise and fall of
+Feudalism, and made a slow but notable advance. That is a fact which
+cannot be gainsaid, and this is impressive. It shows that society, in a
+moral point of view, thrives better under hard restraints than when
+exposed to the dangers of an irreligious, material civilization.</p>
+
+<p>Nor is Feudalism to be condemned as being altogether dark and
+uninteresting. It had redeeming features in the life of the baronial
+family. Under its influence arose the institution of chivalry; and
+though the virtues of chivalry may be poetic, and exaggerated, there can
+be no doubt that it was a civilizing institution, and partially redeemed
+the Middle Ages. It gave rise to beautiful sentiments; it blazed in new
+virtues, rarely seen in the old civilizations. They were peculiar to the
+age and to Europe, were fostered by the Church, and took a coloring from
+Christianity itself. Chivalry bound together the martial barons of
+Europe by the ties of a fraternity of knights. Those armed and mailed
+warriors fought on horseback, and chivalry takes its name from the
+French <i>cheval</i>, meaning a horse. The knights learned gradually to treat
+each other with peculiar courtesy. They became generous in battle or in
+misfortune, for they all alike belonged to the noble class, and felt a
+common bond in the pride of birth. It was not the memory of illustrious
+ancestors which created this aristocratic distinction, as among Roman
+patricians, but the fact that the knights were a superior order. Yet
+among themselves distinctions vanished. There was no higher distinction
+than that of a gentleman. The poorest knight was welcome at any castle
+or at any festivity, at the tournament or in the chase. Generally,
+gallantry and unblemished reputation were the conditions of social rank
+among the knights themselves. They were expected to excel in courage, in
+courtesy, in generosity, in truthfulness, in loyalty. The great
+patrimony of the knight was his horse, his armor, and his valor. He was
+bound to succor the defenceless. He was required to abstain from all
+mean pursuits. If his trade were war, he would divest war of its
+cruelties. His word was seldom broken, and his promises were held
+sacred. If pride of rank was generated in this fraternity of gentlemen,
+so also was scorn of lies and baseness. If there was no brotherhood of
+man, there was the brotherhood of equals. The most beautiful friendships
+arose from common dangers and common duties. A stranger knight was
+treated with the greatest kindness and hospitality. If chivalry
+condemned anything, it was selfishness and treachery and hypocrisy. All
+the old romances and chronicles record the frankness and magnanimity of
+knights. More was thought of moral than of intellectual excellence.
+Nobody was ashamed to be thought religious. The mailed warrior said his
+orisons every day and never neglected Mass. Even in war, prisoners were
+released on their parole of honor, and their ransom was rarely
+exorbitant. The institution tended to soften manners as well as to
+develop the virtues of the heart. Under its influence the rude baron was
+transformed into a courteous gentleman.</p>
+
+<p>But the distinguishing glory of chivalry was devotion to the female
+sex. Respect for woman was born in the German forests before the Roman
+empire fell. It was the best trait of the Germanic barbarians; but under
+the institution of chivalry this natural respect was ripened into
+admiration and gallantry. &quot;Love of God and the ladies&quot; was enjoined as a
+single duty. The knight ever came to the rescue of a woman in danger or
+distress, provided she was a lady. Nothing is better attested than the
+chivalric devotion to woman in a feudal castle. The name of a mistress
+of the heart was never mentioned but in profound respect. Even pages
+were required to choose objects of devotion, to whom they were to be
+loyal unto death. Woman presided in the feudal castle, where she
+exercised a proper restraint. She bestowed the prize of valor at
+tournaments and tilts. To insult a lady was a lasting disgrace,--or to
+reveal her secrets. For the first time in history, woman became the
+equal partner of her husband. She was his companion often in the chase,
+gaily mounted on her steed. She always dined with him, and was the
+presiding genius of the castle. She was made regent of kingdoms, heir of
+crowns, and joint manager of great estates. She had the supreme
+management of her household, and was consulted in every matter of
+importance. What an insignificant position woman filled at Athens
+compared with that in the feudal castle! How different the estimate of
+woman among the Pagan poets from that held by the Proven&ccedil;al poets! What
+a contrast to Juvenal is Sordello! The lady of a baronial hall deemed it
+an insult to be addressed in the language of gallantry, except in that
+vague and poetic sense in which every knight selected some lady as the
+object of his dutiful devotion. She disdained the attentions of the most
+potent prince if his addresses were not honorable. Nor would she bestow
+her love on one of whom she was not proud. She would not marry a coward
+or a braggart, even if he were the owner of ten thousand acres. The
+knight was encouraged to pay his address to any lady if he was
+personally worthy of her love, for chivalry created a high estimate of
+individual merit. The feudal lady ignored all degrees of wealth within
+her own rank. She was as tender and compassionate as she was heroic. She
+was treated as a superior, rather than as an equal. There was a poetical
+admiration among the whole circle of knights. A knight without an object
+of devotion was as &quot;a ship without a rudder, a horse without a bridle, a
+sword without a hilt, a sky without a star.&quot; Even a Don Quixote must
+have his Dulcinea, as well as horse and armor and squire. Dante
+impersonates the spirit of the Middle Ages in his adoration of Beatrice.
+The ancient poets coupled the praises of women with the praises of wine.
+Woman, under the influence of chivalry, became the star of worship, an
+object of idolatry. We read of few divorces in the Middle Ages, or of
+separations, or desertions, or even alienations; these things are a
+modern improvement, borrowed from the customs of the Romans. The awe and
+devotion with which the lover regarded his bride became regard and
+affection in the husband. The matron maintained the rank which had been
+assigned to her as a maiden. The gallant warriors blended even the
+adoration of our Lord with adoration of our Lady,--the deification of
+Christ with the deification of woman. Chivalry, encouraged by the Church
+and always strongly allied with religious sentiments, accepted for
+eternal veneration the transcendent loveliness of the mother of our
+Lord; so that chivalric veneration for the sex culminated in the
+reverence which belongs to the Queen of Heaven,--<i>virgo fidelis; regina
+angelorum</i>. Woman assumed among kings and barons the importance which
+she was supposed to have in the celestial hierarchy. And besides the
+religious influence, the poetic imagination of the time seized upon this
+pure and lovely element, which passed into the songs, the tales, the
+talk, the thought, and the aspirations of all the knightly order.</p>
+
+<p>Whence, now, this veneration for woman which arose in the Middle
+Ages,--a veneration, which all historians attest, such as never existed
+in the ancient civilization?</p>
+
+<p>It was undoubtedly based on the noble qualities and domestic virtues
+which feudal life engendered. Women were heroines. Queen Philippa in the
+absence of her husband stationed herself in the Castle of Bamborough and
+defied the whole power of Douglas. The first military dispatch ever
+written in the Middle Ages was addressed to her; she even took David of
+Scotland a prisoner, when he invaded England. These women of chivalry
+were ready to undergo any fatigues to promote their husbands' interests.
+They were equal to any personal sacrifices. Nothing could daunt their
+courage. They could defend themselves in danger, showing an
+extraordinary fertility of resources. They earned the devotion they
+called out. What more calculated to win the admiration of feudal
+warriors than this devotion and bravery on the part of wives and
+daughters! They were helpmates in every sense. They superintended the
+details of castles. They were always employed, and generally in what
+were imperative duties. If they embroidered dresses or worked
+tapestries, they also wove the cloth for their husband's coats, and made
+his shirts and knit his stockings. If they trained hawks and falcons,
+they fed the poultry and cultivated the flowers. They understood the
+cares of the kitchen, and managed the servants.</p>
+
+<p>But it was their moral virtues which excited the greatest esteem. They
+gloried in their unsullied names; their characters were above suspicion.
+Any violation of the marriage vow was almost unknown; an unfaithful
+wife was infamous. The ordinary life of a castle was that of isolation,
+which made women discreet, self-relying, and free from entangling
+excitements. They had no great pleasures, and but little society. They
+were absorbed with their duties, and contented with their husbands'
+love. The feudal castle, however, was not dull, although it was
+isolated, and afforded few novelties. It was full of strangers, and
+minstrels, and bards, and pedlars, and priests. Women could gratify
+their social wants without seductive excitements. They led a life
+favorable to friendships, which cannot thrive amid the distractions of
+cities. In cities few have time to cultivate friendships, although they
+may not be extinguished. In the baronial castle, however, they were
+necessary to existence.</p>
+
+<p>And here, where she was so well known, woman's worth was recognized. Her
+caprices and frivolities were balanced by sterling qualities,--as a
+nurse in sickness, as a devotee to duties, as a friend in distress, ever
+sympathetic and kind. She was not exacting, and required very little to
+amuse her. Of course, she was not intellectual, since she read but few
+books and received only the rudiments of education; but she was as
+learned as her brothers, and quicker in her wits. She had the vivacity
+which a healthy life secures. Nor was she beautiful, according to our
+standard. She was a ruddy, cheerful, active, healthy woman, accustomed
+to exercise in the open air,--to field-sports and horseback journeys.
+Still less was she what we call fashionable, for the word was not known;
+nor was she a woman of society, for, as we have said, there was no
+society in a feudal castle. What we call society was born in cities,
+where women reign by force of mind and elegant courtesies and grace of
+manners,--where woman is an ornament as well as a power, without
+drudgeries and almost without cares, as at the courts of the
+Bourbon princes.</p>
+
+<p>Yet I am not certain but that the foundation of courtly elegance and
+dignity was laid in the baronial home, when woman began her reign as the
+equal of her wedded lord, when she commanded reverence for her
+courtesies and friendships, and when her society was valued so highly by
+aristocratic knights. In the castle she became genial and kind and
+sympathetic,--although haughty to inferiors and hard on the peasantry.
+She was ever religious. Religious duties took up no small part of her
+time. Christianity raised her more than all other influences combined.
+You never read of an infidel woman when chivalry flourished, any more
+than of a &quot;strong-minded&quot; woman. The feudal woman never left her sphere,
+even amid the pleasures of the chase or the tilt. Her gentle and
+domestic virtues remained with her to the end, and were the most
+prized. Woman was worshipped because she was a woman, not because she
+resembled a man. Benevolence and compassion and simplicity were her
+cardinal virtues. Though her sports were masculine, her character was
+feminine. She yielded to man in matters of reason and intellect, but he
+yielded to her in the virtues of the heart and the radiance of the soul.
+She associated with man without seductive spectacles or demoralizing
+excitements, and retained her influence by securing his respect. In
+antiquity, there was no respect for the sex, even when Aspasia
+enthralled Pericles by the fascinations of blended intellect and beauty;
+but there was respect in the feudal ages, when women were unlettered and
+unpolished. And this respect was alike the basis of friendship and the
+key to power. It was not elegance of manners, nor intellectual culture,
+nor physical beauty which elevated the women of chivalry, but their
+courage, their fidelity, their sympathy, their devotion to
+duty,--qualities which no civilization ought to obscure, and for the
+loss of which no refinements of life can make up.</p>
+
+<p>Thus Chivalry,--the most interesting institution of the Middle Ages,
+rejoicing in deeds of daring, guided by honor and renown, executing
+enterprises almost extravagant, battling injustice and wrong, binding
+together the souls of a great fraternity, scorning lies, revering truth,
+devoted to the Church,--could not help elevating the sex to which its
+proudest efforts were pledged, by cherishing elevated conceptions of
+love, by offering all the courtesies of friendship, by coming to the
+rescue of innocence, by stimulating admiration of all that is heroic,
+and by asserting the honor of the loved ones, even at the risk of life
+and limb. In the dark ages of European society woman takes her place,
+for the first time in the world, as the equal and friend of man,--not by
+physical beauty, not by graces of manner, not even by intellectual
+culture, but by the solid virtues of the heart, brought to light by
+danger, isolation, and practical duties, and by that influence which
+radiated from the Cross. Divest chivalry of the religious element, and
+you take away its glory and its fascination. The knight would be only a
+hardhearted warrior, oppressing the poor and miserable, and only
+interesting from his deeds of valor. But Christianity softened him and
+made him human, while it dignified the partner of his toils, and gave
+birth to virtues which commanded reverence. The soul of chivalry,
+closely examined, in its influence over men or over women, after all,
+was that power which is and will be through all the ages the hope and
+glory of our world.</p>
+
+<p>Thus, with all the miseries, cruelties, injustices, and hardships of
+feudal life, there were some bright spots; showing that Providence never
+deserts the world, and that though progress may be slow in the infancy
+of races, yet with the light of Christianity, even if it be darkened,
+this progress is certain, and will be more and more rapid as
+Christianity achieves its victories.</p>
+
+<p>AUTHORITIES.</p>
+
+<p>Hallam's Middle Ages; Sismondi's Histoire des Fran&ccedil;ais; Guizot's History
+of Civilization (translated); Michelet's History of France (translated);
+Bell's Historical Studies of Feudalism; Lacroix's Manners and Customs of
+the Middle Ages; Mills's History of Chivalry; Sir Walter Scott's article
+in Encyclopaedia Britannica; Perrot's Collection Historique des Ordres
+de Chivalrie; St. Palaye's Memoires de l'Ancienne Chivalrie; Buckle's
+History of Civilization; Palgrave's English Commonwealth; Martin's
+History of France; Freeman's Norman Conquest; M. Fauriel's History of
+Proven&ccedil;al Poetry; Froissart's Chronicles; also the general English
+histories of the reign of Edward III. Don Quixote should he read in this
+connection. And Tennyson in his &quot;Idylls of the King&quot; has incorporated
+the spirit of ancient chivalry.</p>
+
+
+<br><br><hr style="width: 35%;"><br><br>
+<h2><a name="THE_CRUSADES."></a>THE CRUSADES.</h2>
+
+<hr style="width: 25%;">
+
+<p>A.D. 1095-1272.</p>
+
+<p>The great external event of the Middle Ages was the Crusades,--indeed,
+they were the only common enterprise in which Europe ever engaged. Such
+an event ought to be very interesting, since it has reference to
+conflicting passions and interests. Unfortunately, in a literary point
+of view, there is no central figure in the great drama which the princes
+of Europe played for two hundred years, and hence the Crusades have but
+little dramatic interest. No one man represents that mighty movement. It
+was a great wave of inundation, flooding Asia with the unemployed forces
+of Europe, animated by passions which excite our admiration, our pity,
+and our reprobation. They are chiefly interesting for their results, and
+results which were unforeseen. A philosopher sees in them the hand of
+Providence,--the overruling of mortal wrath to the praise of Him who
+governs the universe. I know of no great movement of blind forces so
+pregnant with mighty consequences.</p>
+
+<p>The Crusades were a semi-religious and a semi-military movement. They
+represent the passions and ideas of Europe in the twelfth and thirteenth
+centuries,--its chivalry, its hatred of Mohammedanism, and its desire to
+possess the spots consecrated by the sufferings of our Lord. Their long
+continuance shows the intensity of the sentiments which animated them.
+They were aggressive wars, alike fierce and unfortunate, absorbing to
+the nations that embarked in them, but of no interest to us apart from
+the moral lessons to be drawn from them. Perhaps one reason why history
+is so dull to most people is that the greater part of it is a record of
+battles and sieges, of military heroes and conquerors. This is
+pre-eminently true of Greece, of Rome, of the Middle Ages, and of our
+modern times down to the nineteenth century. But such chronicles of
+everlasting battles and sieges do not satisfy this generation. Hence our
+more recent historians, wishing to avoid the monotony of ordinary
+history, have attempted to explore the common life of the people, and to
+bring out their manners and habits: they would succeed in making history
+more interesting if the materials, at present, were not so scanty and
+unsatisfactory.</p>
+
+<p>The only way to make the history of wars interesting is to go back to
+the ideas, passions, and interests which they represent. Then we
+penetrate to the heart of history, and feel its life. For all the great
+wars of the world, we shall see, are exponents of its great moving
+spiritual forces. The wars of Cyrus and Alexander represent the passion
+of military glory; those of Marius, Sylla, Pompey, and Caesar, the
+desire of political aggrandizement; those of Constantine and Theodosius,
+the desire for political unity and the necessity of self-defence. The
+sweeping and desolating inundations of the barbarians, from the third to
+the sixth century, represent the poverty of those rude nations, and
+their desire to obtain settlements more favorable to getting a living.
+The conquests of Mohammed and his successors were made to swell the
+number of converts of a new religion. The perpetual strife of the
+baronial lords was to increase their domains. The wars of Charlemagne
+and Charles V. were to revive the imperialism of the Caesars,--to create
+new universal monarchies. The wars which grew out of the Reformation
+were to preserve or secure religious liberty; those which followed were
+to maintain the balance of power. Those of Napoleon were at first, at
+least nominally, to spread or defend the ideas of the French Revolution,
+until he became infatuated with the love of military glory. Our first
+great war was to secure national independence, and our second to
+preserve national unity. The contest between Prussia and France was to
+prevent the ascendency of either of those great States. The wars of the
+English in India were to find markets for English goods, employment for
+the sons of the higher classes, and a new field for colonization and
+political power. So all the great passions and interests which have
+moved mankind have found their vent in war,--rough barbaric spoliations,
+love of glory and political aggrandizement, desire to spread religious
+ideas, love of liberty, greediness for wealth, unity of nations,
+jealousy of other powers, even the desire to secure general peace and
+tranquillity. Most wars have had in view the attainment of great ends,
+and it is in the ultimate results of them that we see the progress
+of nations.</p>
+
+<p>Thus wars, contemplated in a philosophical aspect, in spite of their
+repulsiveness are invested with dignity, and really indicate great moral
+and intellectual movements, as well as the personal ambition or vanity
+of conquerors. They are the ultimate solutions of great questions, not
+to be solved in any other way,--unfortunately, I grant,--on account of
+human wickedness. And I know of no great wars, much as I loathe and
+detest them, and severely and justly as they may be reprobated, which
+have not been overruled for the ultimate welfare of society. The wars of
+Alexander led to the introduction of Grecian civilization into Asia and
+Egypt; those of the Romans, to the pacification of the world and the
+reign of law and order; those of barbarians, to the colonization of the
+worn-out provinces of the Roman Empire by hardier and more energetic
+nations; those of Charlemagne, to the ultimate suppression of barbaric
+invasions; those of the Saracens, to the acknowledgment of One God;
+those of Charles V., to the recognized necessity of a balance of power;
+those which grew out of the Reformation, to religious liberty. The
+Huguenots' contest undermined the ascendency of Roman priests in France;
+the Seven Years' War developed the naval power of England, and gave to
+her a prominent place among the nations, and exposed the weakness of
+Austria, so long the terror of Europe; the wars of Louis XIV. sowed the
+seeds of the French Revolution; those of Napoleon vindicated its great
+ideas; those of England in India introduced the civilization of a
+Christian nation; those of the Americans secured liberty and the unity
+of their vast nation. The majesty of the Governor of the universe is
+seen in nothing more impressively than in the direction which the wrath
+of man is made to take.</p>
+
+<p>Now these remarks apply to the Crusades. They represent prevailing
+ideas. Their origin was a universal hatred of Mohammedans. Like
+all the institutions of the Middle Ages, they were a great
+contradiction,--debasement in glory, and glory in debasement. With all
+the fierceness and superstition and intolerance of feudal barons, we see
+in the Crusades the exercise of gallantry, personal heroism, tenderness,
+Christian courtesy,--the virtues of chivalry, unselfishness, and
+magnanimity; but they ended in giving a new impulse to civilization,
+which will be more minutely pointed out before I close my lecture.</p>
+
+<p>Thus the Crusades are really worthy to be chronicled by historians above
+anything else which took place in the Middle Ages, since they gave birth
+to mighty agencies, which still are vital forces in society,--even as
+everything in American history pales before that awful war which
+arrayed, in our times, the North against the South in desperate and
+deadly contest; the history of which remains to be written, but cannot
+be written till the animosities which provoked it have passed away. What
+a small matter to future historians is rapid colonization and
+development of material resources, in comparison with the sentiments
+which provoked that war! What will future philosophers care how many
+bushels of wheat are raised in Minnesota, or car-loads of corn brought
+from Illinois, or hogs slaughtered in Chicago, or yards of cloth woven
+in Lowell, or cases of goods packed in New York, or bales of carpets
+manufactured in Philadelphia, or pounds of cotton exported from New
+Orleans, or meetings of railway presidents at Cincinnati to pool the
+profits of their monopolies, or women's-rights conventions held in
+Boston, or schemes of speculators ventilated in the lobbies of
+Washington, or stock-jobbing and gambling operations take place in every
+large city of the country,--compared with the mighty marshalling of
+forces on the banks of the Potomac, at the call of patriotism, to
+preserve the life of the republic? You cannot divest war of dignity and
+interest when the grandest results, which affect the permanent welfare
+of nations, are made to appear.</p>
+
+<p>The Crusades, as they were historically developed, are mixed up with the
+religious ideas of the Middle Ages, with the domination of popes, with
+the feudal system, with chivalry, with monastic life, with the central
+power of kings, with the birth of mercantile States, with the fears and
+interests of England, France, Germany, and Italy, for two hundred
+years,--yea, with the architecture, commerce, geographical science, and
+all the arts then known. All these principalities and powers and
+institutions and enterprises were affected by them, so that at their
+termination a new era in civilization began. Grasp the Crusades, and you
+comprehend one of the forces which undermined the institutions of the
+Middle Ages.</p>
+
+<p>It is not a little remarkable that the earliest cause of the Crusades,
+so far as I am able to trace, was the adoption by the European nations
+of some of the principles of Eastern theogonies which pertained to
+self-expiation. An Asiatic theological idea prepared the way for the war
+between Europe and Asia. The European pietist embraced the religious
+tenets of the Asiatic monk, which centred in the propitiation of the
+Deity by works of penance. One of the approved and popular forms of
+penance was a pilgrimage to sacred places,--seen equally among
+degenerate Christian sects in Asia Minor, and among the Mohammedans of
+Arabia. What place so sacred as Jerusalem, the scene of the passion and
+resurrection of our Lord? Ever since the Empress Helena had built a
+church at Jerusalem, it had been thronged with pious pilgrims. A
+pilgrimage to old Jerusalem would open the doors of the New Jerusalem,
+whose streets were of gold, and whose palaces were of pearls.</p>
+
+<p>At the close of the tenth century there was great suffering in Europe,
+bordering on despair. The calamities of ordinary life were so great that
+the end of the world seemed to be at hand. Universal fear of impending
+divine wrath seized the minds of men. A great religious awakening took
+place, especially in England, France, and Germany. In accordance with
+the sentiments of the age, there was every form of penance to avert the
+anger of God and escape the flames of hell. The most popular form of
+penance was the pilgrimage to Jerusalem, long and painful as it was.
+Could the pilgrim but reach that consecrated spot, he was willing to
+die. The village pastor delivered the staff into his hands, girded him
+with a scarf, and attached to it a leathern scrip. Friends and neighbors
+accompanied him a little way on his toilsome journey, which lay across
+the Alps, through the plains of Lombardy, over Illyria and Pannonia,
+along the banks of the Danube, by Moesia and Dacia, to Belgrade and
+Constantinople, and then across the Bosphorus, through Bithynia,
+Cilicia, and Syria, until the towers and walls of Tyre, Ptolemais, and
+Caesarea proclaimed that he was at length in the Holy Land. Barons and
+common people swell the number of these pilgrims. The haughty knight,
+who has committed unpunished murders, and the pensive saint, wrapt in
+religious ecstasies, rival each other in humility and zeal. Those who
+have no money sell their lands. Those who have no lands to sell throw
+themselves on Providence, and beg their way for fifteen hundred miles
+among strangers. The roads are filled with these travellers,--on foot,
+in rags, fainting from hunger and fatigue. What sufferings, to purchase
+the favor of God, or to realize the attainment of pious curiosity! The
+heart almost bleeds to think that our ancestors could ever have been so
+visionary and misguided; that such a gloomy view of divine forgiveness
+should have permeated the Middle Ages.</p>
+
+<p>But the sorrows of the pious pilgrims did not end when they reached the
+Holy Land. Jerusalem was then in the hands of the Turks and Saracens (or
+Orientals, a general name given to the Arabian Mohammedans), who exacted
+two pieces of gold from every pilgrim as the price of entering
+Jerusalem, and moreover reviled and maltreated him. The Holy Sepulchre
+could be approached only on the condition of defiling it.</p>
+
+<p>The reports of these atrocities and cruelties at last reached the
+Europeans, filling them with sympathy for the sufferers and indignation
+for the persecutors. An intense hatred of Mohammedans was generated and
+became universal,--a desire for vengeance, unparalleled in history.
+Popes and bishops weep; barons and princes swear. Every convent and
+every castle in Europe is animated with deadly resentment. Rage,
+indignation, and vengeance are the passions of the hour,--all
+concentrated on &quot;the infidels,&quot; which term was the bitterest reproach
+that each party could inflict on the other. An infidel was accursed of
+God, and was consigned to human wrath. And the Mohammedans had the same
+hatred of Christians that Christians had of Mohammedans. In the eyes of
+each their enemies were infidels; and they were enemies because they
+were regarded as infidels.</p>
+
+<p>Such a state of feeling in both Europe and Asia could not but produce an
+outbreak,--a spark only was needed to kindle a conflagration. That spark
+was kindled when Peter of Amiens, a returned hermit, aroused the martial
+nations to a bloody war on these enemies of God and man. He was a
+mean-looking man, with neglected beard and disordered dress. He had no
+genius, nor learning, nor political position. He was a mere fanatic,
+fierce, furious with ungovernable rage. But he impersonated the leading
+idea of the age,--hatred of &quot;the infidels,&quot; as the Mohammedans were
+called. And therefore his voice was heard. The Pope used him as a tool.
+Two centuries later he could not have made himself a passing wonder. But
+he is the means of stirring up the indignation of Europe into a blazing
+flame. He itinerates France and Italy, exposing the wrongs of the
+Christians and the cruelties of the Saracens,--the obstruction placed in
+the way of salvation. At length a council is assembled at Clermont, and
+the Pope--Urban II.--presides, and urges on the sacred war. In the year
+1095 the Pope, in his sacred robes, and in the presence of four hundred
+bishops and abbots, ascends the pulpit erected in the market-place, and
+tells the immense multitude how their faith is trodden in the dust; how
+the sacred relics are desecrated; and appeals alike to chivalry and
+religion. More than this, he does just what Mohammed did when he urged
+his followers to take the sword: he announces, in fiery language, the
+fullest indulgence to all who take part in the expedition,--that all
+their sins shall be forgiven, and that heaven shall be opened to them.
+&quot;It is the voice of God,&quot; they cry; &quot;we will hasten to the deliverance
+of the sacred city!&quot; Every man stimulates the passions of his neighbor.
+All vie in their contributions. The knights especially are
+enthusiastic, for they can continue their accustomed life without
+penance, and yet obtain the forgiveness of their sins. Religious fears
+are turned at first into the channel of penance; and penance is made
+easy by the indulgence of the martial passions. Every recruit wore a red
+cross, and was called <i>crois&eacute;</i>,--cross-bearer; whence the name of
+the holy war.</p>
+
+<p>Thus the Crusades began, at the close of the eleventh century, when
+William Rufus was King of England, when Henry IV. was still Emperor of
+Germany, when Anselm was reigning at Canterbury as spiritual head of the
+English Church, ten years after the great Hildebrand had closed his
+turbulent pontificate.</p>
+
+<p>I need not detail the history of this first Crusade. Of the two hundred
+thousand who set out with Peter the Hermit,--this fiery fanatic, with no
+practical abilities,--only twenty thousand succeeded in reaching even
+Constantinople. The rest miserably perished by the way,--a most
+disorderly rabble. And nothing illustrates the darkness of the age more
+impressively than that a mere monk should have been allowed to lead two
+hundred thousand armed men on an enterprise of such difficulty. How
+little the science of war was comprehended! And even of the five hundred
+thousand men under Godfrey, Tancred, Bohemond, and other great feudal
+princes,--men of rare personal valor and courage; men who led the flower
+of the European chivalry,---only twenty-five thousand remained after
+the conquest of Jerusalem. The glorious array of a hundred and fifty
+thousand horsemen, in full armor, was a miserable failure. The lauded
+warriors of feudal Europe effected almost nothing. Tasso attempted to
+immortalize their deeds; but how insignificant they were, compared with
+even Homer's heroes! A modern army of twenty-five thousand men could not
+only have put the whole five hundred thousand to rout in an hour, but
+could have delivered Palestine in a few months. Even one of the standing
+armies of the sixteenth century, under such a general as Henry IV. or
+the Duke of Guise, could have effected more than all the crusaders of
+two hundred years. The crusaders numbered many heroes, but scarcely a
+single general. There was no military discipline among them: they knew
+nothing of tactics or strategy; they fought pell-mell in groups, as in
+the contests of barons among themselves. Individually they were gallant
+and brave, and performed prodigies of valor with their swords and
+battle-axes; but there was no direction given to their strength
+by leaders.</p>
+
+<p>The Second Crusade, preached half a century afterwards by Saint Bernard,
+and commanded by an Emperor of Germany and a King of France, proved
+equally unfortunate. Not a single trophy consoled Europe for the
+additional loss of two hundred thousand men. The army melted away in
+foolish sieges, for which the crusaders had no genius or proper means.</p>
+
+<p>The Third Crusade, and the most famous, which began in the year 1189, of
+which Philip Augustus of France, Richard Coeur de Lion of England, and
+Frederic Barbarossa of Germany were the leaders,--the three greatest
+monarchs of their age,--was also signally unsuccessful. Feudal armies
+seem to have learned nothing in one hundred years of foreign warfare; or
+else they had greater difficulties to contend with, abler generals to
+meet, than they dreamed of, who reaped the real advantages,--like
+Saladin. Sir Walter Scott, in his &quot;Ivanhoe,&quot; has not probably
+exaggerated the military prowess of the heroes of this war, or the valor
+of Templars and Hospitallers; yet the finest array of feudal forces in
+the Middle Ages, from which so much was expected, wasted its strength
+and committed innumerable mistakes. It proved how useless was a feudal
+army for a distant and foreign war. Philip may have been wily, and
+Richard lion-hearted, but neither had the generalship of Saladin. Though
+they triumphed at Tiberias, at Jaffa, at Caesarea; though prodigies of
+valor were performed; though Ptolemais (or Acre), the strongest city of
+the East, was taken,--yet no great military results followed. More blood
+was shed at this famous siege, which lasted three years, than ought to
+have sufficed for the subjugation of Asia. There were no decisive
+battles, and yet one hundred battles took place under its walls.
+Slaughter effected nothing. Jerusalem, which had been retaken by the
+Saracens, still remained in their hands, and never afterwards was
+conquered by the Europeans. The leaders returned dejected to their
+kingdoms, and the bones of their followers whitened the soil of
+Palestine.</p>
+
+<p>The Fourth Crusade, incited by Pope Innocent III., three years after,
+terminated with divisions among the States of Christendom, without
+weakening the power of the Saracens (1202-4).</p>
+
+<p>Among other expeditions was one called the &quot;Children's Crusade&quot; (1212),
+a wretched, fanatical misery, resulting in the enslavement of many and
+the death of thousands by shipwreck and exposure.</p>
+
+<p>The Fifth Crusade, commanded by the Emperor Frederic II. of Germany
+(1228-9), was diverted altogether from the main object, and spent its
+force on Constantinople. That city was taken, but the Holy Land was not
+delivered. The Byzantine Empire was then in the last stages of
+decrepitude, or its capital would not have fallen, as it did, from a
+naval attack made by the Venetians, and in revenge for the treacheries
+and injuries of the Greek emperors to former crusaders. This, instead of
+weakening the Mussulmans, broke down the chief obstacle to their
+entrance into Europe shortly afterward.</p>
+
+<p>The Sixth Crusade (1248-50) only secured the capture of Damietta, on the
+banks of the Nile.</p>
+
+<p>The Seventh and last of these miserable wars was the most unfortunate
+of all, A.D. 1270. The saintly monarch of France perished, with most of
+his forces, on the coast of Africa, and the ruins of Carthage were the
+only conquest which was made. Europe now fairly sickened over the losses
+and misfortunes and defeats of nearly two centuries, during which five
+millions are supposed to have lost their lives. Famine and pestilence
+destroyed more than the sword. Before disheartened Europe could again
+rally, the last strongholds of the Christians were wrested away by the
+Mohammedans; and their gallant but unsuccessful defenders were treated
+with every inhumanity, and barbarously murdered in spite of truces
+and treaties.</p>
+
+<p>Such were the famous Crusades, only the main facts of which I allude to;
+for to describe them all, or even the more notable incidents, would fill
+volumes,--all interesting to be read in detail by those who have
+leisure; all marked by prodigious personal valor; all disgraceful for
+the want of unity of action and the absence of real generalship. They
+indicate the enormous waste of forces which characterizes nations in
+their progress. This waste of energies is one of the great facts of all
+history, surpassed only by the apparent waste of the forces of nature or
+the fruits of the earth, in the transition period between the time when
+men roamed in forests and the time when they cultivated the land. See
+what a vast destruction there has been of animals by each other; what a
+waste of plants and vegetables, when they could not be utilized. Why
+should man escape the universal waste, when reason is ignored or
+misdirected? Of what use or value could Palestine have been to Europeans
+in the Middle Ages? Of what use can any country be to conquerors, when
+it cannot be civilized or made to contribute to their wants? Europe then
+had no need of Asia, and that perhaps is the reason why Europe then
+could not conquer Asia. Providence interfered, and rebuked the mad
+passions which animated the invaders, and swept them all away. Were
+Palestine really needed by Europe, it could be wrested from the Turks
+with less effort than was made by the feeblest of the crusaders.
+Constantinople--the most magnificent site for a central power--was
+indeed wrested from the Greek emperors, and kept one hundred years; but
+the Europeans did not know what to do with the splendid prize, and it
+was given to the Turks, who made it the capital of a vital empire. All
+the good which resulted to Europe from the temporary possession of
+Constantinople was the introduction into Europe of Grecian literature
+and art. Its political and mercantile importance was not appreciated,
+nor then even scarcely needed. It will one day become again the spoil of
+that nation which can most be benefited by it. Such is the course
+events are made to take.</p>
+
+<p>In this brief notice of the most unsuccessful wars in which Europe ever
+engaged we cannot help noticing their great mistakes. We see rashness,
+self-confidence, depreciation of enemies, want of foresight, ignorance
+of the difficulties to be surmounted. The crusaders were diverted from
+their main object, and wasted their forces in attacking unimportant
+cities, or fortresses out of their way. They invaded the islands of the
+Mediterranean, Egypt, Africa, and Greek possessions. They quarrelled
+with their friends, and they quarrelled with each other. The chieftains
+sought their individual advantage rather than the general good. Nor did
+they provide themselves with the necessities for such distant
+operations. They had no commissariat,--without which even a modern army
+fails. They were captivated by trifles and frivolities, rather than
+directing their strength to the end in view. They allowed themselves to
+be seduced by both Greek and infidel arts and vices. They were betrayed
+into the most foolish courses. They had no proper knowledge of the
+forces with which they were to contend. They wantonly massacred their
+foes when they fell into their hands, increased the animosity of the
+Mohammedans, and united them in a concert which they should themselves
+have sought. They marched by land when they should have sailed by sea,
+and they sailed by sea when they should have marched by land. They
+intrusted the command to monks and inexperienced leaders. They obeyed
+the mandates of apostolic vicars when they should have considered
+military necessities. In fact there was no unity of action, and scarcely
+unity of end. What would the great masters of Grecian and Roman warfare
+have thought of these blunders and stupidities, to say nothing of modern
+generals! The conduct of those wars excites our contempt, in spite of
+the heroism of individual knights. We despise the incapacity of leaders
+as much as we abhor the fanaticism which animated their labors. The
+Crusades have no bright side, apart from the piety and valor of some who
+embarked in them. Hence they are less and less interesting to modern
+readers. The romance about them has ceased to affect us. We only see
+mistakes and follies; and who cares to dwell on the infirmities of human
+nature? It is only what is great in man that moves and exalts us. There
+is nothing we dwell upon with pleasure in these aggressive, useless,
+unjustifiable wars, except the chivalry associated with them. The reason
+of modern times as sternly rebukes them as the heart of the Middle Ages
+sickened at them.</p>
+
+<p>In one aspect they are absolutely repulsive; and this in view of their
+vices. The crusaders were cruel. They wantonly massacred their enemies,
+even when defenceless. Sixty thousand people were butchered on the fall
+of Jerusalem; ten thousand were slaughtered in the Mosque of Omar. The
+Christians themselves felt safe when they sought the retreat of
+churches, in dire calamities at home; but they had no respect for the
+religious retreats of infidels. When any city fell into their hands
+there was wholesale assassination. And they became licentious, as well
+as rapacious and cruel. They learned all the vices of the East. Even
+under the walls of Acre they sang to the sounds of Arabian instruments,
+and danced amid indecent songs. When they took Constantinople they had
+no respect for either churches or tombs, and desecrated even the pulpit
+of the Patriarch. Their original religious zeal was finally lost sight
+of entirely in their military license. They became more hateful to the
+orthodox Greeks than to the infidel Saracens. And when the crusaders
+returned to their homes,--what few of them lived to return,--they
+morally poisoned the communities and villages in which they dwelt. They
+became vagabonds and vagrants; they introduced demoralizing amusements,
+and jugglers and strolling players appeared for the first time in
+Europe. All war is necessarily demoralizing, even war in defence of
+glorious principles, and especially in these times, but much more so is
+unjust, fanatical, and unnecessary war.</p>
+
+<p>But I turn from the record of the mistakes, follies, vices, miseries,
+and crimes which marked the wickedest and most uncalled-for wars of
+European history, to consider their ultimate results: not logical
+results, for these were melancholy,--the depopulation of Europe; the
+decimation of the nobility; the poverty which enormous drains of money
+from their natural channels produced; the spread of vice; the decline of
+even feudal virtues. These evils and others followed naturally and
+inevitably from those distant wars. The immediate effects of all war are
+evil and melancholy. Murder, pillage, profanity, drunkenness,
+extravagance, public distress, bitter sorrows, wasted energies,
+destruction of property, national debts, exaltation of military maxims,
+general looseness of life, distaste for regular pursuits,--these are the
+first-fruits of war, offensive and defensive, and as inevitable and
+uniform as the laws of gravity. No wars were ever more disastrous than
+the Crusades in their immediate effects, in any way they may be viewed.
+It is all one dark view of disappointment, sorrow, wretchedness, and
+sin. There were no bright spots; no gains, only calamities. Nothing
+consoled Europe for the loss of five millions of her most able-bodied
+men,--no increase of territory, no establishment of rights, no glory,
+even; nothing but disgrace and ruin, as in that maddest of all modern
+expeditions, the invasion of Russia by Napoleon.</p>
+
+<p>But after the lapse of nearly seven hundred years we can see important
+results on the civilization of Europe, indirectly effected,--not
+intended, nor designed, nor dreamed of; which results we consider
+beneficent, and so beneficent that the world is probably better for
+those horrid wars. It was fortunate to humanity at large that they
+occurred, although so unfortunate to Europe at the time. In the end,
+Europe was a gainer by them. Wickedness was not the seed of virtue, but
+wickedness was overruled. Woe to them by whom offences come, but it must
+need be that offences come. Men in their depravity will commit crimes,
+and those crimes are punished; but even these are made to praise a Power
+superior to that of devils, as benevolent as it is omnipotent,--in which
+fact I see the utter hopelessness of earth without a superintending and
+controlling Deity.</p>
+
+<p>One important result of the Crusades was the barrier they erected to the
+conquests of the Mohammedans in Europe. It is true that the wave of
+Saracenic invasion had been arrested by Charles Martel four or five
+hundred years before; but in the mean time a new Mohammedan power sprang
+up, of greater vigor, of equal ferocity, and of a more stubborn
+fanaticism. This was that of the Turks, who had their eye on
+Constantinople and all Eastern Europe. And Europe might have submitted
+to their domination, had they instead of the Latins taken
+Constantinople. The conquest of that city was averted several hundred
+years; and when at last it fell into Turkish hands, Christendom was
+strong enough to resist the Turkish armies. We must remember that the
+Turks were a great power, even in the times of Peter the Great, and
+would have taken Vienna but for John Sobieski. But when Urban II., at
+the Council of Clermont, urged the nations of Europe to repel the
+infidels on the confines of Asia, rather than wait for them in the heart
+of Europe, the Asiatic provinces of the Greek Empire were overrun both
+by Turks and Saracens. They held Syria, Armenia, Asia Minor, Africa,
+Spain, and the Balearic Islands. Had not Godfrey come to the assistance
+of a division of the Christian army, when it was surrounded by two
+hundred thousand Turks at the battle of Dorylaeum, the Christians would
+have been utterly overwhelmed, and the Turks would have pressed to the
+Hellespont. But they were beaten back into Syria, and, for a time, as
+far as the line of the Euphrates. But for that timely repulse, the
+battles of Belgrade and Lepanto might not have been fought in subsequent
+ages. It would have been an overwhelming calamity had the Turks invaded
+Europe in the twelfth century. The loss of five millions on the plains
+of Asia would have been nothing in comparison to an invasion of Europe
+by the Mohammedans,--whether Saracens or Turks. It may be that the
+chivalry of Europe would have successfully repelled an invasion, as the
+Saracens repelled the Christians, on their soil. It may be that Asia
+could not have conquered Europe any easier than Europe could
+conquer Asia.</p>
+
+<p>I do not know how far statesmanlike views entered into the minds of the
+leaders of the Crusades. I believe the sentiment which animated Peter
+and Urban and Bernard was pure hatred of the Mohammedans (because they
+robbed, insulted, and oppressed the pilgrims), and not any controlling
+fears of their invasion of Europe. If such a fear had influenced them,
+they would not have permitted a mere rabble to invade Asia; there would
+have been a sense of danger stronger than that of hatred,--which does
+not seem to have existed in the self-confidence of the crusaders. They
+thought it an easy thing to capture Jerusalem: it was a sort of holiday
+march of the chivalry of Europe, under Richard and Philip Augustus.
+Perhaps, however, the princes of Europe were governed by political
+rather than religious reasons. Some few long-headed statesmen, if such
+there were among the best informed of bishops and abbots, may have felt
+the necessity of the conflict in a political sense; but I do not believe
+this was a general conviction. There was, doubtless, a political
+necessity--although men were too fanatical to see more than one side--to
+crush the Saracens because they were infidels, and not because they were
+warriors. But whether they saw it or not, or armed themselves to resist
+a danger as well as to exterminate heresy, the ultimate effects were
+all the same. The crusaders failed in their direct end. They did not
+recover Palestine; but they so weakened or diverted the Mohammedan
+armies that there was not strength enough left in them to conquer
+Europe, or even to invade her, until she was better prepared to resist
+it,--as she did at the battle of Lepanto (A.D. 1571), one of the
+decisive battles of the world.</p>
+
+<p>I have said that the Crusades were a disastrous failure. I mean in their
+immediate ends, not in ultimate results. If it is probable that they
+arrested the conquests of the Turks in Europe, then this blind and
+fanatical movement effected the greatest blessing to Christendom. It
+almost seems that the Christians were hurled into the Crusades by an
+irresistible fate, to secure a great ultimate good; or, to use Christian
+language, were sent as blind instruments by the Almighty to avert a
+danger they could not see. And if this be true, the inference is logical
+and irresistible that God uses even the wicked passions of men to effect
+his purposes,--as when the envy of Haman led to the elevation of
+Mordecai, and to the deliverance of the Jews from one of their
+greatest dangers.</p>
+
+<p>Another and still more noticeable result of the Crusades was the
+weakening of the power of those very barons who embarked in the wars.
+Their fanaticism recoiled upon themselves, and undermined their own
+system. Nothing could have happened more effectually to loosen the
+rigors of the feudal system. It was the baron and the knight that
+marched to Palestine who suffered most in the curtailment of the
+privileges which they had abused,--even as it was the Southern planter
+of Carolina who lost the most heavily in the war which he provoked to
+defend his slave property. In both cases the fetters of the serfs and
+slaves were broken by their own masters,--not intentionally, of course,
+but really and effectually. How blind men are in their injustices! They
+are made to hang on the gallows which they have erected for others. To
+gratify his passion of punishing the infidels, whom he so intensely
+hated, the baron or prince was obliged to grant great concessions to the
+towns and villages which he ruled with an iron hand, in order to raise
+money for his equipment and his journey. He was not paid by Government
+as are modern soldiers and officers. He had to pay his own expenses, and
+they were heavier than he had expected or provided for. Sometimes he was
+taken captive, and had his ransom to raise,--to pay for in hard cash,
+and not in land: as in the case of Richard of England, when, on his
+return from Palestine, he was imprisoned in Austria,--and it took to
+ransom him, as some have estimated, one third of all the gold and silver
+of the realm, chiefly furnished by the clergy. But where was the
+imprisoned baron to get the money for his ransom? Not from the Jews,
+for their compound interest of fifty per cent every six months would
+have ruined him in less than two years. But the village guilds had money
+laid by. Merchants and mechanics in the towns, whom he despised, had
+money. Monasteries had money. He therefore gave new privileges to all;
+he gave charters of freedom to towns; he made concessions to the
+peasantry.</p>
+
+<p>As the result of this, when the baron came back from the wars, he found
+himself much poorer than when he went away,--he found his lands
+encumbered, his castle dilapidated, and his cattle sold. In short, he
+was, as we say of a proud merchant now and then, &quot;embarrassed in his
+circumstances.&quot; He was obliged to economize. But the feudal family would
+not hear of retrenchment, and the baron himself had become more
+extravagant in his habits. As travel and commerce had increased he had
+new wants, which he could not gratify without parting with either lands
+or prerogatives. As the result of all this he became not quite so
+overbearing, though perhaps more sullen; for he saw men rising about him
+who were as rich as he,--men whom his ancestors had despised. The
+artisans, who belonged to the leading guilds, which had become enriched
+by the necessities of barons, or by that strange activity of trade and
+manufactures which war seems to stimulate as well as to destroy,--these
+rude and ignorant people were not so servile as formerly, but began to
+feel a sort of importance, especially in towns and cities, which
+multiplied wonderfully during the Crusades. In other words, they were no
+longer brutes, to be trodden down without murmur or resistance. They
+began to form what we call a &quot;middle class.&quot; Feudalism, in its proud
+ages, did not recognize a middle class. The impoverishment of nobles by
+the Crusades laid the foundation of this middle class, at least in
+large towns.</p>
+
+<p>The growth of cities and the decay of feudalism went on simultaneously;
+and both were equally the result of the Crusades. If the noble became
+impoverished, the merchant became enriched; and the merchant lived, not
+in the country, but in some mercantile mart. The crusaders had need of
+ships. These were furnished by those cities which had obtained from
+feudal sovereigns charters of freedom. Florence, Pisa, Venice, Genoa,
+Marseilles, became centres of wealth and political importance. The
+growth of cities and the extension of commerce went hand in hand.
+Whatever the Crusades did for cities they did equally for commerce; and
+with the needs of commerce came improvement in naval architecture. As
+commerce grew, the ships increased in size and convenience; and the
+products which the ships brought from Asia to Europe were not only
+introduced, but they were cultivated. New fruits and vegetables were
+raised by European husbandmen. Plum-trees were brought from Damascus and
+sugar-cane from Tripoli. Silk fabrics, formerly confined to
+Constantinople and the East, were woven in Italian and French villages.
+The Venetians obtained from Tyrians the art of making glass. The Greek
+fire suggested gunpowder. Architecture received an immense impulse: the
+churches became less sombre and heavy, and more graceful and beautiful.
+Even the idea of the arch, some think, came from the East. The domes and
+minarets of Venice were borrowed from Constantinople. The ornaments of
+Byzantine churches and palaces were brought to Europe. The horses of
+Lysippus, carried from Greece to Rome, and from Rome to Constantinople,
+at last surmounted the palace of the Doges. Houses became more
+comfortable, churches more beautiful, and palaces more splendid. Even
+manners improved, and intercourse became more polished. Chivalry
+borrowed many of its courtesies from the East. There were new
+refinements in the arts of cookery as well as of society. Literature
+itself received a new impulse, as well as science. It was from
+Constantinople that Europe received the philosophy of Plato and
+Aristotle, in the language in which it was written, instead of
+translations through the Arabic. Greek scholars came to Italy to
+introduce their unrivalled literature; and after Grecian literature came
+Grecian art. The study of Greek philosophy gave a new stimulus to human
+inquiry, and students flocked to the universities. They went to Bologna
+to study Roman law, as well as to Paris to study the Scholastic
+philosophy.</p>
+
+<p>Thus the germs of a new civilization were scattered over Europe. It so
+happened that at the close of the Crusades civilization had increased in
+every country of Europe, in spite of the losses they had sustained.
+Delusions were dispelled, and greater liberality of mind was manifest.
+The world opened up towards the East, and was larger than was before
+supposed. &quot;Europe and Asia had been brought together and recognized each
+other.&quot; Inventions and discoveries succeeded the new scope for energies
+which the Crusades opened. The ships which had carried the crusaders to
+Asia were now used to explore new coasts and harbors. Navigators learned
+to be bolder. A navigator of Genoa--a city made by the commerce which
+the Crusades necessitated--crosses the Atlantic Ocean. As the magnetic
+needle, which a Venetian traveller brought from Asia, gave a new
+direction to commerce, so the new stimulus to learning which the Grecian
+philosophy effected led to the necessity of an easier form of writing;
+and printing appeared. With the shock which feudalism received from the
+Crusades, central power was once more wielded by kings, and standing
+armies supplanted the feudal. The crusaders must have learned something
+from their mistakes; and military science was revived. There is scarcely
+an element of civilization which we value, that was not, directly or
+indirectly, developed by the Crusades, yet which was not sought for, or
+anticipated even,--the centralization of thrones, the weakening of the
+power of feudal barons, the rise of free cities, the growth of commerce,
+the impulse given to art, improvements in agriculture, the rise of a
+middle class, the wonderful spread of literature, greater refinements in
+manners and dress, increased toleration of opinions, a more cheerful
+view of life, the simultaneous development of energies in every field of
+human labor, new hopes and aspirations among the people, new glories
+around courts, new attractions in the churches, new comforts in the
+villages, new luxuries in the cities. Even spiritual power became less
+grim and sepulchral, since there was less fear to work upon.</p>
+
+<p>I do not say that the Crusades alone produced the marvellous change in
+the condition of society which took place in the thirteenth century, but
+they gave an impulse to this change. The strong sapling which the
+barbarians brought from their German forests and planted in the heart of
+Europe,--and which had silently grown in the darkest ages of barbarism,
+guarded by the hand of Providence,--became a sturdy tree in the feudal
+ages, and bore fruit when the barons had wasted their strength in Asia.
+The Crusades improved this fruit, and found new uses for it, and
+scattered it far and wide, and made it for the healing of the nations.
+Enterprise of all sorts succeeded the apathy of convents and castles.
+The village of mud huts became a town, in which manufactures began. As
+new wants became apparent, new means of supplying them appeared. The
+Crusades stimulated these wants, and commerce and manufactures supplied
+them. The modern merchant was born in Lombard cities, which supplied the
+necessities of the crusaders. Feudalism ignored trade, but the baron
+found his rival in the merchant-prince. Feudalism disdained art, but
+increased wealth turned peasants into carpenters and masons; carpenters
+and masons combined and defied their old masters, and these masters left
+their estates for the higher civilization of cities, and built palaces
+instead of castles. Palaces had to be adorned, as well as churches; and
+the painters and handicraftsmen found employment. So one force
+stimulated another force, neither of which would have appeared if feudal
+life had remained <i>in statu quo</i>.</p>
+
+<p>The only question to settle is, how far the marked progress of the
+twelfth and thirteenth centuries may be traced to the natural
+development of the Germanic races under the influence of religion, or
+how far this development was hastened by those vast martial expeditions,
+indirectly indeed, but really. Historians generally give most weight to
+the latter. If so, then it is clear that the most disastrous wars
+recorded in history were made the means--blindly, to all appearance,
+without concert or calculation--of ultimately elevating the European
+races, and of giving a check to the conquering fanaticism of the enemies
+with whom they contended with such bitter tears and sullen
+disappointments.</p>
+
+<p>AUTHORITIES.</p>
+
+<p>Michaud's Histoire des Croisades; Mailly's L'Esprit des Croisades;
+Choiseul; Daillecourt's De l'Influence des Croisades; Sur l'&Eacute;tat des
+Peuples en Europe; Heeren's Ueber den Einfluss der Kreuzz&uuml;ge;
+Sporschill's Geschichte der Kreuzz&uuml;ge; Hallam's Middle Ages; Mill's
+History of the Crusades; James's History of the Crusades; Michelet's
+History of France (translated); Gibbon's Decline and Fall; Milman's
+Latin Christianity; Proctor's History of the Crusades; Mosheim.</p>
+
+
+<br><br><hr style="width: 35%;"><br><br>
+<h2><a name="WILLIAM_OF_WYKEHAM."></a>WILLIAM OF WYKEHAM.</h2>
+
+<hr style="width: 25%;">
+
+<p>A.D. 1324-1404.</p>
+
+<p>GOTHIC ARCHITECTURE.</p>
+
+<p>A.D. 1100-1400.</p>
+
+<p>Church Architecture is the only addition which the Middle Ages made to
+Art; but even this fact is remarkable when we consider the barbarism and
+ignorance of the Teutonic nations in those dark and gloomy times. It is
+difficult to conceive how it could have arisen, except from the stimulus
+of religious ideas and sentiments,--like the vast temples of the
+Egyptians. The artists who built the hoary and attractive cathedrals and
+abbey churches which we so much admire are unknown men to us, and yet
+they were great benefactors. It is probable that they were practical and
+working architects, like those who built the temples of Greece, who
+quietly sought to accomplish their ends,--not to make pictures, but to
+make buildings,--as economically as they could consistently with the end
+proposed, which end they always had in view.</p>
+
+<p>In this Lecture I shall not go back to classic antiquity, nor shall I
+undertake to enter upon any disquisition on Art itself, but simply
+present the historical developments of the Church architecture of the
+Middle Ages. It is a technical and complicated subject, but I shall try
+to make myself understood. It suggests, however, great ideas and
+national developments, and ought to be interesting.</p>
+
+<p>The Romans added nothing to the architecture of the Greeks except the
+arch, and the use of brick and small stones for the materials of their
+stupendous structures. Now Christianity and the Middle Ages seized the
+arch and the materials of the Roman architects, and gradually formed
+from these a new style of architecture. In Roman architecture there was
+no symbolism, no poetry, nothing to represent consecrated sentiments. It
+was mundane in its ideas and ends; everything was for utility. The
+grandest efforts of the Romans were feats of engineering skill, rather
+than creations inspired by the love of the beautiful. What was beautiful
+in their edifices was borrowed from the Greeks; what was original was
+intended to accommodate great multitudes, whether they sought the sports
+of the amphitheatre or the luxury of the bath. Their temples were small,
+comparatively, and were Grecian.</p>
+
+<p>The first stage in the development of Church architecture was reached
+amid the declining glories of Roman civilization, before the fall of the
+Empire; but the first model of a Christian church was not built until
+after the imperial persecutions. The early Christians worshipped God in
+upper chambers, in catacombs, in retired places, where they would not be
+molested, where they could hide in safety. Their assemblies were small,
+and their meetings unimportant. They did nothing to attract attention.
+The worshippers were mostly simple-minded, unlettered, plebeian people,
+with now and then a converted philosopher, or centurion, or lady of rank
+They met for prayer, exhortation, the reading of the Scriptures, the
+singing of sacred melodies, and mutual support in trying times. They did
+not want grand edifices. The plainer the place in which they assembled
+the better suited it was to their circumstances and necessities. They
+scarcely needed a rostrum, for the age of sermons had not begun; still
+less the age of litanies and music and pomps. For such people, in that
+palmy age of faith and courage, when the seeds of a new religion were
+planted in danger and watered with tears; when their minds were directed
+almost entirely to the soul's welfare and future glory; when they loved
+one another with true Christian disinterestedness; when they stimulated
+each other's enthusiasm by devotion to a common cause (one Lord, one
+faith, one baptism); when they were too insignificant to take any social
+rank, too poor to be of any political account, too ignorant to attract
+the attention of philosophers,--<i>any</i> place where they would be
+unmolested and retired was enough. In process of time, when their
+numbers had increased, and when and wherever they were tolerated; when
+money began to flow into the treasuries; and especially when some gifted
+leader (educated perhaps in famous schools, yet who was fervent and
+eloquent) desired a wider field for usefulness,--then church edifices
+became necessary.</p>
+
+<p>This original church was modelled after the ancient Basilica, or hall of
+justice or of commerce: at one end was an elevated tribunal, and back of
+this what was called the &quot;apsis,&quot;--a rounded space with arched roof. The
+whole was railed off or separated from the auditory, and was reserved
+for the clergy, who in the fourth century had become a class. The apsis
+had no window, was vaulted, and its walls were covered with figures of
+Christ and of the saints, or of eminent Christians who in later times
+were canonized by the popes. Between the apsis and the auditory, called
+the &quot;nave,&quot; was the altar; for by this time the Church was borrowing
+names and emblems from the Jews and the old religions. From the apsis to
+the extremity of the other end of the building were two rows of pillars
+supporting an upper wall, broken by circular arches and windows, called
+now the &quot;clear story.&quot; In the low walls of the side aisles were also
+windows. Both the nave and the aisles supported a framework of roof,
+lined with a ceiling adorned with painting.</p>
+
+<p>For some time we see no marked departure, at this stage, from the
+ancient basilica. The church is simple, not much adorned, and adapted to
+preaching. The age in which it was built was the age of pulpit orators,
+when bishops preached,--like Basil, Chrysostom, Ambrose, Augustine, and
+Leo,--when preaching was an important part of the service, by the
+foolishness of which the world was to be converted. Probably there were
+but few what we should call fine churches, but there was one at Rome
+which was justly celebrated, built by Theodosius, and called St. Paul's.
+It is now outside the walls of the modern city. The nave is divided into
+five aisles, and the main one, opening into the apsis, is spanned by a
+lofty arch supported by two colossal columns. The apsis is eighty feet
+in breadth. All parts of the church--one of the largest of Rome--are
+decorated with mosaics. It has two small transepts at the extremity of
+the nave, on each side of the apsis. The four rows of magnificent
+columns, supporting semicircular arches, are Corinthian. In this church
+the Greek and Roman architecture predominates. The essential form of the
+church is like a Pagan basilica. We see convenience, but neither
+splendor nor poetry. Moreover it is cheerful. It has an altar and an
+apsis, but it is adapted to preaching rather than to singing. The
+public dangers produce oratory, not chants. The voice of the preacher
+penetrates the minds of the people, as did that of Savonarola at
+Florence announcing the invasion of Italy by the French,--days of fear
+and anxiety, reminding us also of Chrysostom at Antioch, when in his
+spacious basilican church he roused the people to penitence, to avert
+the ire of Theodosius.</p>
+
+<p>The first transition from the basilica to the Gothic church is called
+the <i>Romanesque</i>, and was made after the fall of the Empire, when the
+barbarians had erected new kingdoms on its ruins; when literature and
+art were indeed crushed, yet when universal desolation was succeeded by
+new forms of government and new habits of life; when the clergy had
+become an enormous power, greatly enriched by the contributions of
+Christian princes. This transition retained the traditions of the fallen
+Empire, and yet was adapted to a semi-civilized people, nominally
+converted to Christianity. It arose after the fall of the Merovingians,
+when Charlemagne was seeking to restore the glory of the Western Empire.
+Paganism had been suppressed by law; even heresies were extinguished in
+the West. Kings and people were alike orthodox, and bowed to the
+domination of the Church. Abbeys and convents were founded everywhere
+and richly endowed. The different States and kingdoms were poor, but the
+wealth that existed was deposited in sacred retreats. The powers of the
+State were the nobles, warlike and ignorant, rapidly becoming feudal
+barons, acknowledging only a nominal fealty to the Crown. Kings had no
+glory, defied by their own subjects and unsupported by standing armies.
+But these haughty barons were met face to face by equally haughty
+bishops, armed with spiritual weapons. These bishops were surrounded and
+supported by priests, secular and regular,--by those who ruled the
+people in small parishes, and those who ruled the upper classes in their
+monastic cells. Learning had fled to monasteries (what little there
+was), and the Church became a new attraction.</p>
+
+<p>The architects of the Romanesque, who were probably churchmen, retained
+the nave of the basilica, but made it narrower, and used but two rows of
+columns. They introduced the transepts, or cross-enclosures, making them
+to project north and south of the nave, in the space separated from the
+apsis; and the apsis was expanded into the choir, filled with priests
+and choristers. The building now assumes the form of a cross. The choir
+is elevated several steps above the nave, and beneath it is the crypt,
+where the bishops and abbots and saints are buried. At the intersection
+of choir, nave, and transept,--an open, square place,--rises a square
+tower, at each corner of which is a massive pier supporting four arches.
+The windows are narrow, with semicircular arches. At the western
+entrance, at the end opposite the apse, is a small porch, where the
+consecrated water is placed, in an urn or basin, and this is inclosed
+between two towers. The old Roman atrium, or fore-court, entirely
+disappears. In its place is a grander fa&ccedil;ade; and the pillars--which are
+all internal, like those of an Egyptian temple, not external, as in the
+Greek temple--have no longer Grecian capitals, but new combinations of
+every variety, and the pillars are even more heavy and massive than the
+Doric. The flat wooden ceiling of the nave disappears, on account of
+frequent fires, and the eye rests on arches supporting a stone roof. All
+the arches are semicircular, like those of the Coliseum and of the Roman
+aqueducts and baths. They are built of small stones united by cement.
+The building is low and heavy, and its external beauty is in the west
+front or fa&ccedil;ade, with its square towers and circular window and
+ornamented portal. The internal beauty is from the pillars supporting
+the roof, and the tower which intersects the nave, choir, and transepts.
+Sometimes, instead of a tower there is a dome, reminding us of Byzantine
+workmanship.</p>
+
+<p>But this Romanesque church is also connected with monastic institutions,
+whose extensive buildings join the church at the north or south. The
+church is wedded to monasticism; one supports the other, and both make a
+unity exceedingly efficient in the Middle Ages. The communication
+between the church and the convent is effected by a cloister,--a vaulted
+gallery surrounding a square, open space, where the brothers walk and
+meditate, but do not talk, except in undertone or whisper; for all the
+precincts are sacred, made for contemplation and silence,--a retreat
+from the noisy, barbaric world. Connected with the cloisters is a court
+opening into the refectory, where the brothers dine on herbs and eggs
+and a little meat,--also in silence, and, where the rule is strict, in
+gloom,--an ascetic, dreary discipline. The whole range of buildings is
+enclosed with walls, like a fortress. You see in this architecture the
+gloom and desolation which overspread the world. Churches are heavy and
+sombre; they are places for dreary meditation on the end of the world,
+on the failure of civilization, on the degradation of humanity,--and yet
+the only places where man may be brought in contact with the Deity who
+presides over a fallen world, exalting human hopes to heaven, where
+miseries end, and worship begins.</p>
+
+<p>This style of architecture prevailed till the twelfth century, and was
+seen in its greatest perfection in Germany under the Saxon emperors,
+especially in the Rhenish provinces, as in the cathedrals of Spires,
+Mentz, Worms, and Nuremberg. Its general effect was gloomy and heavy; a
+separation from the outward world,--a world disgraced by feudal wars and
+peasants' wrongs and general ignorance, which made men sad, morose,
+inhuman. It flourished in ages when the poor had no redress, and were
+trodden under the feet of hard feudal masters; when there was no law but
+of brute force; when luxuries were few and comforts rare,--an age of
+hardship, privation, poverty, suffering; an age of isolations and
+sorrows, when men were forced to look beyond the grave for peace and
+hope, when immortality through a Redeemer was the highest inspiration of
+life. Everybody was agitated by fears. The clergy made use of this
+universal feeling by presenting the terrors of the law,--the penalty of
+sin,--everlasting physical burnings, from which the tortured soul could
+be extricated only by penance and self-expiation, offerings to the
+Church, and entire subserviency to the will of the priest, who held the
+keys of heaven and hell. The men who lived when the Romanesque churches
+dotted every part in Europe looked upon society and saw nothing but
+grief,--heavy burdens, injustices, oppressions, cruel wrongs; and they
+hid their faces and wept, and said: &quot;Let us retreat from this miserable
+world which discord ravages; let us hide ourselves in contemplation; let
+us prepare to meet God in judgment; let us bring to Him our offering;
+let us propitiate Him; let us build Him a house, where we may chant our
+mournful songs.&quot; So the church arises,--in Germany, in France, in
+England,--solemn, mystical, massive, a type of sorrow, in the form of a
+cross, with &quot;a sepulchral crypt like the man in the tomb, before the
+lofty spire pointed to the man who had risen to Heaven.&quot; The church is
+still struggling, and is not jubilant, except in Gregorian chants, and
+is not therefore lofty or ornamental. It is a vault. It is more like a
+catacomb than a basilica, for the world is buried deep in sorrows and
+fears. Look to any of the Saxon churches of the period when the
+Romanesque prevailed, and they are low, gloomy, and damp, though massive
+and solemn. The church as an edifice ever represents the Church as an
+institution or a power, ever typifies prevailing sentiments and ideas.
+Perhaps the finest of the old Romanesque churches was that of Cluny, in
+Burgundy, destroyed during the French Revolution. It had five aisles,
+and was five hundred and twenty feet in length. It had a stately tower
+at the intersection of the transepts, and six other towers. It was early
+Norman, and loftier than the Saxon churches, although heavy and massive
+like them.</p>
+
+<p>But the Romanesque church, with all its varieties, is still gloomy,
+dark, sepulchral, reminding us of the sorrows of the Middle Ages, and
+the dreary character of prevailing religious sentiments,--fervent,
+sincere, profound, but sad,--the sentiments of an age of ignorance
+and faith.</p>
+
+<p>The Crusades came. A new era burst upon the world. The old ideas became
+modified; society became more cheerful, because more chivalric,
+adventurous, poetic. The world opened towards the East, and was larger
+than was before supposed. Liberality of mind began to dawn on the
+darkened ages; no longer were priests supreme. The gay Proven&ccedil;als began
+to sing; the universities began to teach and to question. The Scholastic
+philosophy sent forth such daring thinkers as Erigena and Ab&eacute;lard.
+Orthodoxy was still supreme before such mighty intellects as Anselm,
+Bernard, and Thomas Aquinas, but it was assailed. Ab&eacute;lard put forth his
+puzzling questions. The Schoolmen began to think for themselves, and the
+iron weight of Feudalism was less oppressive. Free cities and commerce
+began to enrich the people. Kings were becoming more powerful; grim
+spiritual despotism was less arrogant. The end of the world, it was
+found, had not come. A glorious future began to shed forth the beams of
+its coming day. It was the dawn of a new civilization.</p>
+
+<p>So a lighter, more cheerful, and grander architecture, with symbolic
+beauties, appeared with changing ideas and sentiments. The Church, no
+longer a gloomy power, struggling with Saracens and barbarism, but
+dominant, triumphant, issues forth from darksome crypts and soars
+upward,--elevates her vaulted roofs. &quot;The Oriental ogive appears.... The
+architects heap arcade on arcade, ogive on ogive, pyramid on pyramid,
+and give to all geometrical symmetry and artistic grace.... The Greek
+column is there, but dilated to colossal proportions, and exfoliated in
+a variegated capital.&quot; The old Roman arch disappears, and the pointed
+arch is substituted,--graceful and elevated. The old Egyptian obelisk
+appears in the spire reaching to heaven, full of aspiration. The window
+becomes larger and encroaches on the naked wall, and radiates in mystic
+roses. The arches widen and the piers become more lofty. Stained glass
+appears and diffuses religious light. Every part of the church becomes
+decorated and symbolical and harmonious, though infinitely variegated.
+The altars have pictures over them. Shrines and monuments appear in the
+niches. The dresses of the priests are more gorgeous. The music of the
+choir peals forth hallelujahs. Christ is risen from the tomb. &quot;The
+purple of his blood colors the windows.&quot; The roof, like pinnacles and
+spires, seems to reach the skies. The pressure of the walls is downwards
+rather than lateral. The vertical lines of Cologne are as marked as the
+old horizontal lines of the Parthenon. The walls too are not so heavy,
+and are supported by buttresses, which give increased beauty to the
+exterior,--greater light and shade. &quot;Every part of the church seems to
+press forward and strive for greater freedom, for outward
+manifestation.&quot; Even the broad and expansive window presses to the outer
+surface of the walls, now broken by buttresses and pinnacles. The
+window--the eye of the edifice--is more cheerful and intelligent. More
+calm is the imposing fa&ccedil;ade, with its mighty towers and lofty spires,
+tapering like a pyramid, with its round oriel window rich in beautiful
+tracery, and its wide portal with sculptured saints and martyrs. And in
+all the churches you see geometrical proportions. &quot;Even the cross of the
+church is deduced from the figure by which Euclid constructed the
+equilateral triangle,&quot; The columns present the proportions of the Doric,
+as to diameter and height. The love of the true and beautiful meet. The
+natural and supernatural both appear. All parts symbolize the passion of
+Christ. If the crypt speaks of death, the lofty and vaulted roof and the
+beautiful pointed arches, and the cheerful window, and the jubilant
+chants speak of life. &quot;The old church reminds one of the Christ that lay
+in the tomb; the new, of the Christ who arose the third day.&quot; The old
+fosters meditation and silence; the new kindles the imagination, by its
+variety of perspective arrangement and mystic representation,--still
+reverential, still expressive of consecrated sentiments, yet more
+cheerful. The foliated shaft, the rich tracery of the window, the
+graceful pinnacle, the Arabian gorgeousness of the interior,--as if the
+crusaders had learned something from the East,--the innumerable shrines
+and pictures, the variegated marbles of the altar, with its vessels of
+silver and gold, the splendid dresses of the priests, the imposing
+character of the ritualism, the treasures lavished everywhere, all
+speak greater independence, wealth, and power. The church takes the
+place of all amusements. Its various attractions draw together the
+people from their farms and shops. They are gaily dressed, as if they
+were attending a festival. Their condition is so improved that they have
+time for holidays. And these the Church multiplies; for perpetual toil
+is the grave of intellect. The people must have rest, amusement,
+excitement. All these things the Catholic Church gives, and consecrates.
+Crusader, baron, knight, priest, peasant, all resort to the church for
+benedictions. Women too are there, and in greater numbers; and they
+linger for the confessional. When the time comes that women stay away
+from church, like busy, preoccupied, sceptical men, then let us be on
+the watch for some great catastrophe, since practical paganism will then
+be restored, and the angels of light will have left the earth.</p>
+
+<p>Paris and its neighborhood was the cradle of this new development of
+architecture which we wrongly call the Gothic, even as Paris was the
+centre of the new-born intelligence of the era. The word &quot;Gothic&quot;
+suggests destructive barbarism: the English, French, and Germans
+descended chiefly from Normans, Saxons, and Burgundians. This form of
+church architecture rapidly spreads to Germany, England, and Spain. The
+famous Suger, the minister of a powerful king, built the abbey of St.
+Denis. The churches of Rheims, Paris, and Bourges arose in all their
+grandeur. The fa&ccedil;ade of Rheims is the most significant example of the
+wonderful architecture of the thirteenth century. In the church of
+Amiens you see the perfection of the so-called Gothic,--so graceful are
+its details, so dazzling is its height. The central aisle is one hundred
+and thirty-two feet in altitude,--only surpassed by that of Beauvais,
+which is fourteen feet higher. It was then that the cathedral of Rouen
+was built, with its elegant lightness,--a marvel to modern travellers.
+Soon after, the cathedral of Cologne appears, more grand than
+either,--but left unfinished,--with its central aisle forty-four feet in
+width, rising one hundred and forty feet into the air, with its colossal
+towers, intended to support the slender openwork spires, five hundred
+and twenty feet in height. The whole church is five hundred and
+thirty-two feet in length. I confess this church made a greater
+impression on my mind than did any Gothic church in Europe,--more, even,
+than Milan, with its unnumbered pinnacles and statues and its marble
+roof. I could not rest while surveying its ten thousand wonders,--so
+much lightness combined with strength; so grand, and yet so cheerful; so
+exquisitely proportioned, so complicated in details, and yet a grand
+unity; a glorious and fit temple for the reverential worship of the
+Deity. Oh, how grand are those monuments which were designed to last
+through ages, and which are consecrated, not to traffic, not to
+pleasure, not to material wealth, but to the worship of that Almighty
+God to whom every human being is personally responsible!</p>
+
+<p>I cannot enumerate the churches of Mediaeval Europe,--built possibly by
+the Freemasons, certainly by men familiar with all that is practical in
+their art, with all that is hallowed and poetical. I glance at the
+English cathedrals, built during this epoch,--the period of the Crusades
+and the revival of learning.</p>
+
+<p>And here I allude to the man who furnishes me with a text to my
+discourse,--William of Wykeham, chancellor and prime minister of Edward
+III., the contemporary of Chaucer and Wyclif,--who flourished in the
+fourteenth century, and who built Winchester Cathedral; a great and
+benevolent prelate, who also founded other colleges and schools. But I
+merely allude to him, since my subject is the art to which he gave an
+impulse, rather than any single individual. No one man represents church
+architecture any more appropriately than any one man represents the
+Feudal system, or Monasticism, or the Crusades, or the French
+Revolution.</p>
+
+<p>I do not think the English cathedrals are equal to those of Cologne,
+Rheims, Amiens, and Rouen; but they are full of interest, and they have
+varied excellences. That of Salisbury is the only one which is of
+uniform style. Its glory is in its spire, as that of Lincoln is in its
+west front, and that of Westminster is in its nave. Gloucester is
+celebrated for its choir, and York for its tower. In all are beautiful
+vistas of pillars and arches. But they lack the inspiration of the
+Catholic Church. They are indeed hoary monuments, petrified mysteries, a
+&quot;passion of stone,&quot; as Michelet speaks of the marble histories which
+will survive his rhapsodies. They alike show the pilgrimage of humanity
+through gloomy centuries. If their great wooden screens were removed,
+which separate the choir from the nave, the cathedrals doubtless would
+appear to more advantage, and especially if they were filled with altars
+and shrines and pictures, and lighted candles on the altars,--filled
+also with crowds of worshippers, reverent before the gorgeously attired
+ministers of Divine Omnipotence, and excited by transporting chants, and
+the various appeals to sense and imagination. The reason must be
+assisted by the imagination, before the mind can revel in the glories of
+Gothic architecture. Imagination intensifies all our pleasures, even
+those of sense; and without imagination--yea, a memory stored with the
+pious deeds of saints and martyrs in bygone ages--a Gothic cathedral is
+as much a sealed book as Wordsworth is to Taine. The Protestant tourist
+from Michigan or Pennsylvania can &quot;do&quot; any cathedral in two hours, and
+wonder why they make such a fuss about a church not half so large as
+the New York Central Railroad station. The wonders of cathedrals must be
+studied, like the glories of a landscape, with an eye to the beautiful
+and the grand, cultured and practised by the contemplation of ideal
+excellence, when the mind summons the imagination to its aid, with all
+the poetry and all the history which have been learned in a life of
+leisure and study. How different the emotions of a Ruskin or a Tennyson,
+in surveying those costly piles, from those of a man fresh from a
+distillery or from a warehouse of cotton fabrics, or even from those of
+many fashionable women, whose only aesthetic accomplishment is to play
+languidly and mechanically on an instrument, and whose only intellectual
+achievement is to have devoured a dozen silly novels in the course of a
+summer spent in alternate sleep and dalliance! Nor does familiarity
+always give a zest to the pleasure which arises from the creations of
+art or the glories of nature. The Roman beggar passes the Coliseum or
+St. Peter's without notice or enjoyment, as a peasant sees unmoved the
+snow-capped mountains of Switzerland or the beautiful lakes of
+Killarney. Said sorrowfully my guide up the Rhigi, &quot;I wish I lived in
+Holland, for there are men there.&quot; Yet there are those whom the ascent
+of Rhigi and the ruined monuments of ancient Rome would haunt for a
+lifetime, in whose memory they would be perpetually fresh, never to pass
+away, any more than the looks and the vows of early love from the mind
+of a sentimental woman.</p>
+
+<p>The glorious old architecture whose peculiarity was the pointed arch,
+flourished only about three hundred years in its purity and matchless
+beauty. Then another change took place. The ideal became lost in
+meaningless ornaments. The human figure peoples the naked walls. &quot;Man
+places his own image everywhere.... The tomb rises like a mausoleum in
+side chapels. Man is enthroned, not God.&quot; The corruption of the art
+keeps pace with the corruption of the Papacy and the discords of
+society. In the fourteenth century the Mediaeval has lost its charm
+and faith.</p>
+
+<p>And then sets in the new era, which begins with Michael Angelo. It is
+marked by the revival of Greek art and Greek literature. At Florence
+reign the Medici. On the throne of Saint Peter sits an Alexander VI. or
+a Julius II. Genoa is a city of merchant-palaces. Museums are collected
+of the excavated remains of Roman antiquity. Everybody kindles with the
+contemplation of the long-buried glories of a classic age; everybody
+reads the classic authors: Cicero is a greater oracle than Saint
+Augustine. Scholars flock to Italy. The popes encourage the growing
+taste for Pagan philosophy. Ancient art regains her long-abdicated
+throne, and wields her sceptre over the worshippers of the Parthenon and
+the admirers of Aeschylus and Thucydides. With the revived statues of
+Greece appear the most beautiful pictures ever produced by the hand of
+man; and with pictures and statues architecture receives a new
+development. It is the blending of the old Greek and Roman with the
+Gothic, and is called the Renaissance. Michael Angelo erects St.
+Peter's, the heathen Pantheon, on the intersection of Gothic nave and
+choir and transept; a glorious dome, more beautiful than any Gothic
+spire or tower, rising four hundred and fifty feet into the air. And in
+the interior are classic circular arches and pillars, so vast that one
+is impressed as with great feats of engineering skill. All that is
+variegated in marbles adorns the altars; all that is bewitching in
+paintings is transferred to mosaics. And this new style of Italy spreads
+into France and England. Sir Christopher Wren builds St. Paul's,--more
+Grecian than Gothic,--and fills London with new churches, not one of
+which is Gothic, and all different. The brain is bewildered in
+attempting to classify the new and ever-shifting forms of the revived
+Italian. And so for three hundred years the architects mingle the Gothic
+with the classical, until now a mongrel architecture is the disgrace of
+Europe; varied but not expressive, resting on no settled principles,
+neither on vertical nor on horizontal lines,--blended together,
+sometimes Grecian porticos on Elizabethan structures, spires resting not
+on towers but roofs, Byzantine domes on Grecian temples, Greek columns
+with Lombard arches, flamboyant panelling, pendant pillars from the
+roof, all styles mixed up together, Corinthian pilasters acting as
+Gothic buttresses, and pointed arches with Doric friezes,--a heap of
+diverse forms, alien alike from the principles of Wykeham and Vitruvius.</p>
+
+<p>And this varied mongrel style of architecture corresponds with the
+confused civilization of the period,--neither Greek nor Gothic, but a
+mixture of both; intolerant priests wrangling with pagan sceptics and
+infidels,--Aquaviva with Pascal, the hierarchy of the French Church with
+Voltaire and Rousseau, Protestant divines with the Catholic clergy;
+Geneva and Rome compromising at Oxford, the authority of the Fathers
+made antagonistic to the authority of popes, new vernacular tongues
+supplanting Latin in the universities; everywhere war on the Middle
+Ages, without full emancipation from their dogmas, ancient paganism made
+to uphold the Church, an unbounded activity of intellect casting off all
+established rules, the revival of the old Greek republics, democracy
+asserting its claim against absolute power; nothing settled, nothing at
+rest, but motion in every direction,--science combating faith, faith
+spurning reason, humanity arrogating divinity, the confusion of races,
+Babel towers of vanity and pride in the new projected enterprises,
+Christian nations embroiled in constant wars, gold and silver set up as
+idols, the rise of new powers in the shapes of new industries and new
+inventions, commerce filling the world with wealth, armies contending
+for rights as well as for the aggrandizement of monarchies: was there
+ever such a simmering and boiling and fermenting period of activities
+since the world began? In such a wild and tumultuous agitation of
+passions and interests and ideas, how could Art reappear either in the
+classic severity of Greek temples or the hoary grandeur of Mediaeval
+cathedrals? In this jumble we look for new creations, but no creations
+in art appear, only fantastic imitations. There is no creation except in
+a new field, that of science and mechanical inventions,--where there is
+the most extraordinary and astonishing development of human genius ever
+seen on earth, but &quot;of the earth earthy,&quot; aiming at material good.
+Architecture itself is turned into great feats of engineering. It does
+not span the apsis of a church; it spans rivers and valleys. The church,
+indeed, passes out of mind, if not out of sight, in the new material
+age, in the multiplication of bridges and gigantic reservoirs,--old Rome
+brought back again in its luxuries.</p>
+
+<p>And yet the exactness of science and the severity of criticism--begun
+fifty years ago, in the verification of principles--produce a better
+taste. Architects have sought to revive the purest forms of both Gothic
+and Grecian. If they could not create a new style, they would imitate
+the old: as in philosophy, they would go round in the old circles. As
+science revives the atoms of Democritus, so art would reproduce the
+ideas of Phidias and Vitruvius, and even the poetry and sanctity of the
+Middle Ages. Within fifty years Christendom has been covered with Gothic
+churches, some of which are as beautiful as those built by Freemasons.
+The cathedrals have been copied rigidly, even for village churches. The
+Parthenon reappears in the Madeleine. We no longer see, as in the
+eighteenth century, Gothic spires on Roman basilicas, or Grecian
+porticos ornamenting Norman towers. The various styles of two thousand
+years are not mixed up in the same building. We copy either the
+horizontal lines of Paganism or the vertical lines of the ages of Faith.
+No more harmonious Gothic edifice was ever erected than the new Catholic
+cathedral of New York.</p>
+
+<p>The only absurdity is seen when radical Protestantism adopts the church
+of pomps and liturgies. When the Reformation was completed, men sought
+to build churches where they could hear the voice of the preacher; for
+the mission of Protestantism is to teach, not to sing. Protestantism
+glories in its sermons as much as Catholicism in its chants. If the
+people wish to return again to ritualism, let them have the Gothic
+church. If they wish to be electrified by eloquence, let them have a
+basilica, for the voice of the preacher is lost in high and vaulted
+roofs. If they wish to join in the prayers and the ceremonies of the
+altar, let them have the clustering pillars and the purple windows.</p>
+
+<p>Everything turns upon what is meant by a church. What is it for? Is it
+for liturgical services, or is it for pulpit eloquence? Solve that
+question, and you solve the Reformation. &quot;My house,&quot; saith the Divine
+Voice, &quot;shall be called the house of prayer.&quot; It is &quot;by the foolishness
+of preaching,&quot; said Paul, that men are saved.</p>
+
+<p>If you will have the prayers of the Middle Ages and the sermons of the
+Reformation both together, then let the architects invent a new style,
+which shall allow the blending of prayer and pulpit eloquence. You
+cannot have them both in a Grecian temple, or in a Gothic church. You
+must combine the Parthenon with Salisbury, which is virtually a new
+miracle of architecture. Will that miracle be wrought? I do not know.
+But a modern Protestant church, with all the wonders of our modern
+civilization, must be something new,--some new combination which shall
+be worthy of the necessity of our times. This is what the architect must
+now aspire to accomplish; he must produce a house in which one can both
+hear the sermon, and be stimulated by inspiring melodies,--for the
+Church must have both. The psalms of David and the chants of Gregory
+must be blended with the fervid words of a Chrysostom and a Chalmers.</p>
+
+<p>This, at least, should be borne in mind: the church edifice <i>must</i> be
+adapted to the end designed. The Gothic architects adapted their vaults
+and pillars to the ceremonies of the Catholic ritual. If it is this you
+want, then copy Gothic cathedrals. But if it is preaching you want, then
+restore the Grecian temple,--or, better still, the Roman theatre,--where
+the voice of the preacher is not lost either in Byzantine domes or
+Gothic vaults, whose height is greater than their width. The preacher
+must draw by the distinctness of his tones; for every preacher has not
+the musical voice of Chrysostom, or the electricity of St. Bernard. He
+can neither draw nor inspire if he cannot be heard; he speaks to stones,
+not to living men or women. He loses his power, and is driven to chants
+and music to keep his audience from deserting him. He must make his
+choir an orchestra; he must hide himself in priestly vestments; he must
+import opera singers to amuse and not instruct. He cannot instruct when
+he cannot be heard, and heard easily. Unless the people catch every tone
+of his voice his electricity will be wasted, and he will preach in vain,
+and be tired out by attempting to prevent echoes. The voice of Saint
+Paul would be lost in some of our modern fashionable churches. Think of
+the absurdity of Baptists and Methodists and Presbyterians affecting to
+restore Gothic monuments, when the great end of sacred eloquence is lost
+in those devices which appeal to sense. Think of the folly of erecting a
+church for eight hundred people as high as Westminster Abbey. It is not
+the size of a church which prevents the speaker from being heard,--it is
+the disproportion of height with breadth and length, and the echoes
+produced by arcades. Spurgeon is heard easily by seven thousand people,
+and Talmage by six thousand, and Dr. Hall by four thousand, because the
+buildings in which they preach are adapted to public speaking. Those who
+erect theatres take care that a great crowd shall be able to catch even
+the whispers of actors. What would you think of the good sense and
+judgment of an architect who should construct a reservoir that would
+leak, in order to make it ornamental; or a schoolhouse without
+ventilation; or a theatre where actors could only be seen; or a hotel
+without light and convenient rooms; or a railroad bridge which would not
+support a heavy weight?</p>
+
+<p>A Protestant church is designed, no matter what the sect may be to which
+it belongs, not for poetical or aesthetic purposes, not for the
+admiration of architectural expenditures, not even for music, but for
+earnest people to hear from the preacher the words of life and death,
+that they may be aroused by his enthusiasm, or instructed by his wisdom;
+where the poor are not driven to a few back seats in the gallery; where
+the meeting is cheerful and refreshing, where all are stimulated to
+duties. It must not be dark, damp, and gloomy, where it is necessary to
+light the gas on a foggy day, and where one must be within ten feet of
+the preacher to see the play of his features. Take away facilities for
+hearing and even for seeing the preacher, and the vitality of a
+Protestant service is destroyed, and the end for which the people
+assemble is utterly defeated. Moreover, you destroy the sacred purposes
+of a church if you make it so expensive that the poor cannot get
+sittings. Nothing is so dull, depressing, funereal, as a church occupied
+only by prosperous pew-holders, who come together to show their faces
+and prove their respectability, rather than to join in the paeans of
+redemption, or to learn humiliating lessons of worldly power before the
+altar of Omnipotence. To the poor the gospel is preached; and it is ever
+the common people who hear most gladly gospel truth. Ah, who are the
+common people? I fancy we are all common people when we are sick, or in
+bereavement, or in adversity, or when we come to die. But if advancing
+society, based on material wealth and epicurean pleasure, demands
+churches for the rich and churches for the poor,--if the lines of
+society must be drawn somewhere,--let those architects be employed who
+understand, at least, the first principles of their art. I do not mean
+those who learn to draw pictures in the back room of a studio, but
+conscientious men, if you cannot find sensible men. And let the pulpit
+itself be situated where the people can hear the speaker easily, without
+straining their eyes and ears. Then only will the speaker's voice ring
+and kindle and inspire those who come together to hear God Almighty's
+message; then only will he be truly eloquent and successful, since then
+only does his own electricity permeate the whole mass; then only can he
+be effective, and escape the humiliation of being only a part of a vain
+show, where his words are disregarded and his strength is wasted in the
+echoes of vaults and recesses copied from the gloomy though beautiful
+monuments of ages which can never, never again return, any more than can
+&quot;the granite image worship of the Egyptians, the oracles of Dodona, or
+the bulls of the Mediaeval popes.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>AUTHORITIES.</p>
+
+<p>Fergusson's History of Architecture; Durand's Parallels; Eastlake's
+Gothic and Revival; Ruskin, Daly, and Penrose; Britton's Cathedrals and
+Architectural Antiquities; Pugin's Specimens and Examples of Gothic
+Architecture; Rickman's Styles of Gothic Architecture; Street's Gothic
+Architecture in Spain; Encyclopaedia Britannica (article Architecture).</p>
+
+
+<br><br><hr style="width: 35%;"><br><br>
+<h2><a name="JOHN_WYCLIF."></a>JOHN WYCLIF.</h2>
+
+<hr style="width: 25%;">
+
+<p>A.D. 1324-1384.</p>
+
+<p>DAWN OF THE REFORMATION.</p>
+
+<p>The name of Wyclif suggests the dawn of the Protestant Reformation; and
+the Reformation suggests the existence of evils which made it a
+necessity. I do not look upon the Reformation, in its earlier stages, as
+a theological movement. In fact, the Catholic and Protestant theology,
+as expounded and systematized by great authorities, does not materially
+differ from that of the Fathers of the Church. The doctrines of
+Augustine were accepted equally by Thomas Aquinas and John Calvin. What
+is called systematic divinity, as taught in our theological seminaries,
+is a series of deductions from the writings of Paul and other apostles,
+elaborately and logically drawn by Athanasius, Jerome, Augustine, and
+other lights of the early Church, which were defended in the Middle Ages
+with amazing skill and dialectical acuteness by the Scholastic doctors,
+with the aid of the method which Aristotle, the greatest logician of
+antiquity, bequeathed to philosophy. Neither Luther nor Calvin departed
+essentially from these great deductions on such vital subjects as the
+existence and attributes of God, the Trinity, sin and its penalty,
+redemption, grace, and predestination. The creeds of modern Protestant
+churches are in harmony with the writings of both the Fathers and the
+Scholastic doctors on the fundamental principles of Christianity. There
+are, indeed, some ideas in reference to worship, and the sacraments, and
+the government of the Church, and aids to a religious life, defended by
+the Scholastic doctors, which Protestants do not accept, and for which
+there is not much authority in the writings of the Fathers. But the main
+difference between Protestants and Catholics is in reference to the
+institutions of the Church,--institutions which gradually arose with the
+triumph of Christianity in its contest with Paganism, and which received
+their full development in the Middle Ages. It was the enormous and
+scandalous corruptions which crept into these <i>institutions</i> which led
+to the cry for reform. It was the voice of Wyclif, denouncing these
+abuses, which made him famous and placed him in the van of reformers.
+These abuses were generally admitted and occasionally attacked by
+churchmen and laymen alike,--even by the poets. They were too flagrant
+to be denied.</p>
+
+<p>Now what were the prominent evils in the institutions of the Church
+which called for reform, and in reference to which Wyclif raised up his
+voice?--for in his day there was only <i>one</i> Church. An enumeration of
+these is necessary before we can appreciate the labors and teachings of
+the Reformer. I can only state them; I cannot enlarge upon them. I state
+only what is indisputable, not in reference to theological dogmas so
+much as to morals and ecclesiastical abuses.</p>
+
+<p>The centre and life and support of all was the Papacy,--an institution,
+a great government, not a religion.</p>
+
+<p>I have spoken of this great power as built up by Leo I., Gregory VII.,
+and Innocent III., and by others whom I have not mentioned. So much may
+be said of the necessity of a central spiritual power in the dark ages
+of European society that I shall not combat this power, or stigmatize it
+with offensive epithets. The necessities of the times probably called it
+into existence, like other governments, although I cannot see any
+argument drawn from the Scriptures, or from the history of the early
+Apostolic Church, to warrant its existence. Nor would I defend the long
+series of papal usurpations by which the Roman pontiffs got possession
+of the government of both Church and State. I speak not of their
+quarrels with princes about investitures, in which their genius and
+their heroism were displayed rather than by efforts in behalf of
+civilization.</p>
+
+<p>But the popes exercised certain powers and prerogatives in England,
+about the time of Wyclif, which were exceedingly offensive to the
+secular rulers of the land. They claimed the island as a sort of
+property which reason and the laws did not justify,--a claim which led
+to heavy exactions and forced contributions on the English people that
+crippled the government and impoverished the nation. Boys and favorites
+were appointed by the popes to important posts and livings. Church
+preferments were almost exclusively in the hands of the Pope; and these
+were often bought. A yearly tribute had been forced on the nation in the
+time of John. Peter's pence were collected from the people. Enormous
+sums, under various pretences, flowed to Rome. And the clergy were taxed
+as well as the laity. The contributions which were derived from the sale
+of benefices, from investitures, from the transfer of sees, from the
+bestowal of rings and crosiers (badges of episcopal authority), from the
+confirmation of elections, and other taxes, irritated sovereigns, and
+called out the severest denunciation of statesmen.</p>
+
+<p>Closely connected with papal exactions was the enormous increase of the
+Mendicant friars, especially the Dominicans and Franciscans, who had
+been instituted by Innocent III. to uphold the papal domination. These
+itinerating beggars in their black-and-gray gowns infested every town
+and village in England. For a century after their institution, they were
+the ablest and perhaps the best soldiers of the Pope, and did what the
+Jesuits afterwards performed, and perhaps the Methodists a hundred
+years ago,--gained the hearts of the people and stimulated religious
+life; but in the fourteenth century they were a nuisance. They sold
+indulgences, they invented pious frauds, they were covetous under
+pretence of poverty, they had become luxurious in their lives, they
+slandered the regular clergy, they usurped the prerogatives of parish
+priests, they enriched their convents, they accommodated themselves to
+the wishes of the great, and were marked by those peculiarities of which
+the Jesuits were accused in the time of Pascal. As they had not in
+England, as in Spain and Italy, tribunals of inquisition, they were
+ridiculed, despised, and hated, rather than feared. One gets the truest
+impression of the popular estimate of these friars from the sarcasms of
+Chaucer. The Friar Tuck whom Sir Walter Scott has painted was a very
+different man from the Dominicans or the Franciscans of the thirteenth
+century, when they reigned in the universities, and were the confessors
+of monarchs and the most popular preachers of their time. In the
+fourteenth century they were consumed with jealousies and rivalries and
+animosities against each other; and all the various orders,--Dominican,
+Franciscan, Carmelite,--in spite of their professions of poverty, were
+the possessors of magnificent monasteries, and fattened on the credulity
+of the world. Besides these Mendicant friars, England was dotted with
+convents and religious houses belonging to the different orders of
+Benedictines, which, though enormously rich, devoured the substance of
+the poor. There were more than twenty thousand monks in a population of
+three or four millions; and most of them led idle and dissolute lives,
+and were subjects of perpetual reproach. Reforms of the various
+religious houses had been attempted, but all reforms had failed. Nor
+were the lives of the secular clergy much more respectable than those of
+the great body of monks. They are accused by all historians of avarice,
+venality, dissoluteness, and ignorance; and it was their incapacity,
+their disregard of duties, and indifference to the spiritual interests
+of their flocks that led to the immense popularity of the Mendicant
+friars, until they, in their turn, became perhaps a greater scandal than
+the parish priests whose functions they had usurped. Both priests and
+monks in the time of Bishop Grost&ecirc;te of Lincoln frequented taverns and
+gambling-houses. So enormous and scandalous was the wealth of the
+clergy, that as early as 1279, under Edward I., Parliament passed a
+statute of mortmain, forbidding religious bodies to receive bequests
+without the King's license.</p>
+
+<p>With the increase of scandalous vices among the clergy was a corruption
+in the doctrines of the Church; not those which are strictly
+theological, but those which pertained to the sacraments, and the
+conditions on which absolution was given and communion administered. In
+the thirteenth century, as the Scholastic philosophy was reaching its
+fullest development, we notice the establishment of the doctrine of
+transubstantiation, the withholding the cup from the laity, and the
+necessity of confession as the condition of receiving the
+communion,--which corruptions increased amazingly the power of the
+clergy over the minds of superstitious people, and led to still more
+flagrant evils, like the sale of indulgences and the perversion of the
+doctrine of penance, originally enforced in order to aid the soul to
+overcome the tyranny of the body, but finally accepted as the expiation
+for sin; so that the door of heaven itself was opened by venal priests
+only to those whom they could control or rob.</p>
+
+<p>Such was the state of the Church when Wyclif was born,--in 1324, near
+Richmond in Yorkshire, about a century after the establishment of
+universities, the creation of the Mendicant orders, and the memorable
+usurpation of Innocent III.</p>
+
+<p>In the year 1340, during the reign of Edward III., we find him at the
+age of sixteen a student in Merton College at Oxford,--the college then
+most distinguished for Scholastic doctors; the college of Islip, of
+Bradwardine, of Occam, and perhaps of Duns Scotus. It would seem that
+Wyclif devoted himself with great assiduity to the study which gave the
+greatest intellectual position and influence in the Middle Ages, and
+which required a training of nineteen years in dialectics before the
+high degree of Doctor of Divinity was conferred by the University. We
+know nothing of his studious life at Oxford until he received his
+degree, with the title of Evangelical or Gospel Doctor,--from which we
+infer that he was a student of the Bible, and was more remarkable for
+his knowledge of the Scriptures than for his dialectical skill. But even
+for his knowledge of the Scholastic philosophy he was the most eminent
+man in the University, and he was as familiar with the writings of Saint
+Augustine and Jerome as with those of Aristotle. It was not then the
+fashion to study the text of the Scriptures so much as the commentaries
+upon it; and he who was skilled in the &quot;Book of Sentences&quot; and the
+&quot;Summa Theologica&quot; stood a better chance of preferment than he who had
+mastered Saint Paul.</p>
+
+<p>But Wyclif, it would seem, was distinguished for his attainments in
+everything which commanded the admiration of his age. In 1356, when he
+was thirty-two, he wrote a tract on the last ages of the Church, in view
+of the wretchedness produced by the great plague eight years before. In
+1360, at the age of thirty-six, he attacked the Mendicant orders, and
+his career as a reformer began,--an unsuccessful reformer, indeed, like
+John Huss, since the evils which he combated were not removed. He merely
+protested against the corruptions which good men lamented; and that is
+nearly all that great men can do when they are beyond their age. They
+are simply witnesses of truth, and fortunate are they if they do not die
+as martyrs; for in the early Church &quot;witnesses&quot; and &quot;martyrs&quot; were
+synonymous ([Greek: <i>martyres</i>]). The year following, 1361, Wyclif was
+presented to the rich rectory of Fillingham by Baliol College, and was
+promoted the same year to the wardenship of that ancient college. The
+learned doctor is now one of the &quot;dons&quot; of the university,--at that
+time, even more than now, a great dignitary. It would be difficult for
+an unlearned politician of the nineteenth century to conceive of the
+exalted position which a dignitary of the Church, crowned with
+scholastic honors, held five hundred years ago. It gave him access to
+the table of his sovereign, and to the halls of Parliament. It made him
+an oracle in all matters of the law. It created for him a hearing on all
+the great political as well as ecclesiastical issues of the day. What
+great authorities in the thirteenth century were Albertus Magnus, Thomas
+Aquinas, and Bonaventura! Scarcely less than they, in the next century,
+were Duns Scotus and John Wyclif,--far greater in influence than any of
+the proud feudal lords who rendered service to Edward III., broad as
+were their acres, and grand as were their castles. Strange as it may
+seem, the glory that radiated from the brow of a scholar or a saint was
+greatest in ages of superstition and darkness; perhaps because both
+scholars and saints were rare. The modern lights of learning may be
+better paid than in former days, but they do not stand out to the eye of
+admiring communities in such prominence as they did among our ancestors.
+Who stops and turns back to gaze reverentially on a poet or a scholar
+whom he passes by unconsciously, as both men and women strained their
+eyes to see an Ab&eacute;lard or a Dante? Even a Webster now would not command
+the homage he received fifty years ago.</p>
+
+<p>It is not uninteresting to contemplate the powers that have ruled in
+successive ages, outside the realms of conquerors and kings. In the
+ninth and tenth centuries they were baronial lords in mail-clad armor;
+in the eleventh and twelfth centuries these powers, like those of
+ancient Egypt, were priests; in the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries
+they were the learned doctors, as in the schools of Athens when
+political supremacy was lost; in the sixteenth century--the era of
+reforms--they were controversial theologians, like those of the age of
+Theodosius; in the seventeenth century they were fighting nobles; in the
+eighteenth they were titled and hereditary courtiers and great landed
+proprietors; in the nineteenth they are bankers, merchants, and railway
+presidents,--men who control the material interests of the country. It
+is only at elections, though managed by politicians, that the people are
+a power. Socially, the magnates are the rich. It is money which in these
+times all classes combine to worship. If this be questioned, see the
+adulation which even colleges and schools of learning pay to their
+wealthy patrons or those from whom they seek benefits. The patrons of
+the schools in the Middle Ages were princes and nobles; but these
+princes and nobles bowed down in reverence to learned bishops and great
+theological doctors.</p>
+
+<p>Wyclif was the representative of the schools when he attacked the abuses
+of the Church. It is not a little singular that the great religious
+movements in England have generally come from Oxford, while Cambridge
+has been distinguished for great movements in science. In 1365 he was
+appointed to the headship of Canterbury Hall, founded by Archbishop
+Islip, afterwards merged into Christ Church,--the most magnificent and
+wealthy of all the Oxford Colleges. When Islip died, in 1366, and
+Langham, originally a monk of Canterbury, was made archbishop, the
+appointment of Wyclif was pronounced void by Langham, and the revenues
+of the Hall of which he was warden, or president, were sequestered.
+Wyclif on this appealed to the Pope, who, however, ratified Langham's
+decree,--as it would be expected, for the Pope sustained the friars whom
+Wyclif had denounced. The spirit of such a progressive man was, of
+course, offensive to the head of the Church. In this case the Crown
+confirmed the decision of the Pope, 1372, since the royal license was
+obtained by a costly bribe. The whole transaction was so iniquitous that
+Wyclif could not restrain his indignation.</p>
+
+<p>But before this decision of the Crown was made, the services of Wyclif
+had been accepted by the Parliament in its resistance to the claim which
+Pope Urban V. had made in 1366, to the arrears of tribute due under
+John's vassalage. Edward III. had referred this claim to Parliament, and
+the Parliament had rejected it without hesitation on the ground that
+John had no power to bind the realm without its consent. The Parliament
+was the mere mouthpiece of Wyclif, who was now actively engaged in
+political life, and probably, as Dr. Lechler thinks, had a seat in
+Parliament. He was, at any rate, a very prominent political character;
+for he was sent in 1374 to Bruges, as one of the commissioners to treat
+with the representatives of the French pope in reference to the
+appointment of foreigners to the rich benefices of the Church in
+England, which gave great offence to the liberal and popular party in
+England,--for there was such a progressive party as early as the
+fourteenth century, although it did not go by that name, and was not
+organized as parties are now. In fact, in all ages and countries there
+are some men who are before their contemporaries. The great grievance of
+which the more advanced and enlightened complained was the interference
+of the Pope with ecclesiastical livings in England. Wyclif led the
+opposition to this usurpation; and this opposition to the Pope on the
+part of a churchman made it necessary for him to have a protector
+powerful enough to shield him from papal vengeance.</p>
+
+<p>This protector he found in John of Gaunt, Duke of Lancaster, who, next
+to the King, had the greatest authority in England. It is probable that
+Wyclif enjoyed at Bruges the friendship of this great man (great for his
+station, influence, and birth, at least), who was at the head of the
+opposition to the papal claims,--resisted not only by him, but by
+Parliament, which seems to have been composed of men in advance of their
+age. As early as 1371 this Parliament had petitioned the King to exclude
+all ecclesiastics from the great offices of State, held almost
+exclusively by them as the most able and learned people of the realm.
+From the time of Alfred this custom had not been seriously opposed by
+the baronial lords, who were ignorant and unenlightened; but in the
+fourteenth century light had broken in upon the darkness: the day had at
+least dawned, and the absurdity of confining the cares of State and
+temporal matters to men who ought to be absorbed with spiritual duties
+alone was seen by the more enlightened of the laity. But the King was
+not then prepared to part with the most efficient of his ministers
+because they happened to be ecclesiastics, and the custom continued for
+nearly two centuries longer. Bishop Williams was the last of the clergy
+who filled the great office of chancellor, and Archbishop Laud was the
+last of the clergy who became a prime minister. The reign of Elizabeth
+was marked, for the first time in the history of England, by the almost
+total exclusion of prelates from great secular offices. In the reign of
+Edward III. it was William of Wykeham, Bishop of Winchester,
+who held the great seal, and the Bishop of Exeter who was lord
+treasurer,--probably the two men in the whole realm who were the most
+experienced in public affairs as men of business. Wyclif, it would
+appear, although he was an ecclesiastic, here took the side of
+Parliament against his own order. In his treatise on the &quot;Regimen of the
+Church&quot; he contends that neither doctors nor deacons should hold secular
+offices, or even be land stewards and clerks of account, and appeals to
+the authority of the Fathers and Saint Paul in confirmation of his
+views. At this time he was a doctor of divinity and professor of
+theology in the University, having been promoted to this high position
+in 1372, two years before he was sent as commissioner to Bruges. In
+1375, he was presented to the rectory of Lutterworth in Leicestershire
+by the Crown, in reward for his services as an ambassador.</p>
+
+<p>In 1376 Parliament renewed its assault on pontifical pretensions and
+exactions; and there was cause, since twenty thousand marks, or pounds,
+were sent annually to Rome from the Pope's collector in England, which
+collector was a Frenchman,--another indignity. Against these corruptions
+and usurpations Wyclif was unsparing in his denunciations; and the
+hierarchy at last were compelled, by their allegiance to Rome, to take
+measures to silence and punish him as a pertinacious heretic. The term
+&quot;heretic&quot; meant in those days opposition to papal authority, as much as
+opposition to the theological dogmas of the Church; and the brand of
+heresy was the greatest stigma which authority could impose. The bold
+denunciator of papal abuses was now in danger. He was summoned by the
+convocation to appear in Saint Paul's Cathedral and answer for his
+heresies, on which occasion were present the Archbishop of Canterbury
+and the arrogant Bishop of London,--the latter the son of the Earl of
+Devonshire, of the great family of the Courtenays. Wyclif was attended
+by the Duke of Lancaster and the Earl Marshal,--Henry Percy, the
+ancestor of the Dukes of Northumberland,--who forced themselves into the
+Lady's chapel, behind the high altar, where the prelates were assembled.
+An uproar followed from this unusual intrusion of the two most powerful
+men of the kingdom into the very sanctuary of prelatic authority. What
+could be done when the great Oxford professor--the most learned
+Scholastic of the kingdom--was protected by a royal duke clothed with
+viceregal power, and the Earl Marshal armed with the sword of State?</p>
+
+<p>The position of Wyclif was as strong as it was before he was attacked.
+Nor could he be silenced except by the authority of the Pope
+himself,--still acknowledged as the supreme lord of Christendom; and the
+Pope now felt that he must assert his supremacy and interpose his
+supreme authority, or lose his hold on England. So he hurled his
+weapons, not yet impotent, and fulminated his bulls, ordering the
+University, under penalty of excommunication, to deliver the daring
+heretic into the hands of the Archbishop of Canterbury or the Bishop of
+London; and further commanding these two prelates to warn the King
+against the errors of Wyclif, and to examine him as to his doctrines,
+and keep him in chains until the Pope's pleasure should be further
+known. In addition to these bulls, the Pope sent one to the King
+himself. It was resolved that the work should be thoroughly done this
+time. Yet it would appear that these various bulls threatening an
+interdict did not receive a welcome from any quarter. The prelates did
+not wish to quarrel with such an antagonist as the Duke of Lancaster,
+who was now the chief power in the State, the King being in his last
+illness. They allowed several months to pass before executing their
+commission, during which Wyclif was consulted by the great Council of
+State whether they should allow money to be carried out of the realm at
+the Pope's demands, and he boldly declared that they should not; thus
+coming in direct antagonism with hierarchal power. He also wrote at this
+time pamphlets vindicating himself from the charges made against him,
+asserting the invalidity of unjust excommunication, which, if allowed,
+would set the Pope above God.</p>
+
+<p>At last, after seven months, the prelates took courage, and ordered the
+University to execute the papal bulls. To imprison Wyclif at the command
+of the Pope would be to allow the Pope's temporal rule in England; yet
+to disobey the bulls would be disregard of the papal power altogether.
+In this dilemma the Vice-Chancellor--himself a monk--ordered a nominal
+imprisonment. The result of these preliminary movements was that Wyclif
+appeared at Lambeth before the Archbishop, to answer his accusers. The
+great prelates had a different spirit from the University, which was
+justly proud of its most learned doctor,--a man, too, beyond his age in
+his progressive spirit, for the universities in those days were not so
+conservative as they subsequently became. At Lambeth Wyclif found
+unexpected support from the people of London, who broke into the
+archiepiscopal chapel and interrupted the proceedings, and a still more
+efficient aid from the Queen Dowager,--the Princess Joan,--who sent a
+message forbidding any sentence against Wyclif. Thus was he backed by
+royal authority and the popular voice, as Luther was afterwards in
+Saxony. The prelates were overcome with terror, and dropped the
+proceedings; while the Vice-Chancellor of Oxford, who had tardily and
+imperfectly obeyed the Pope, was cast into prison for a time and
+compelled to resign his office.</p>
+
+<p>Wyclif had gained a great triumph, which he used by publishing a summary
+of his opinions in thirty-three articles, both in Latin and English. In
+these it would seem that he attacked the infallibility of the
+Pope,--liable to sin like any other person, and hence to be corrected by
+the voices of those who are faithful to a higher Power than his,--a blow
+to the exercise of excommunication from any personal grounds of malice
+or hatred, or when used to extort unjust or mercenary demands. He also
+maintained that the endowments of the clergy could be lawfully withdrawn
+if they were perverted or abused,--a bold assertion in his day, but
+which he professed he was willing to defend, even unto death. If the
+prelates had dared, or had possessed sufficient power, he would
+doubtless have suffered death from their animosity; but he was left
+unmolested in his retirement at his rectory, although he kept himself
+discreetly out of the way of danger. When the memorable schism took
+place in the Roman government by the election of an anti-pope, and both
+popes proclaimed a crusade and issued their indulgences, Wyclif, who
+heretofore had admitted the primacy of the Roman See, now openly
+proclaimed the doctrine that the Church would be better off with no pope
+at all. He owed his safety to the bitterness of the rival popes, who in
+their mutual quarrels had no time to think of him. And his opportunity
+was improved by writing books and homilies, in which the antichristian
+claims of the popes were fearlessly exposed and commented upon. In fact,
+he now openly denounces the Pope as Antichrist, from his pulpit at
+Lutterworth, to his simple-minded parishioners, for whose good he seems
+to have earnestly labored,--the model of a parish priest. It is supposed
+that Chaucer had him in view when he wrote his celebrated description of
+a good parson,--&quot;benign&quot; and diligent, learned and pious, giving a noble
+example to his flock of disinterestedness and devotion to truth and
+duty, in contrast with the ordinary lives of the clergy of those times,
+who were infamous for their ignorance, sensuality, gluttony, and
+ostentation; frequenting taverns, and wasting their time in gambling,
+idleness, and disgraceful brawls.</p>
+
+<p>Hitherto Wyclif had simply protested against the external evils of the
+Church without much effect, although protected by powerful laymen and
+encouraged by popular favor. The time had not come for a real and
+permanent reformation; but he prepared the way for it, and in no slight
+degree, by his translation of the Scriptures into the vernacular
+tongue,--the greatest service he rendered to the English people and the
+cause of civilization. All the great reformers, successful and
+unsuccessful, appealed to the Scriptures as the highest authority, even
+when they did not rebel against the papal power, like Savonarola in
+Florence, I do not get the impression that Wyclif was a great popular
+preacher like the Florentine reformer, or like Luther, Latimer, and
+Knox. He was a student, first of the Scholastic theology, and afterwards
+of the Bible. He lived in a quiet way, as scholars love to live, in his
+retired rectory near Oxford, preaching plain and simple sermons to his
+parishioners, but spending his time chiefly in his library, or study.</p>
+
+<p>Wyclif's translation of the Bible was a great event, for it was the
+first which was made in English, although parts of the Bible had been
+translated into the Saxon tongue between the seventh and eleventh
+centuries. He had no predecessor in that vast work, and he labored amid
+innumerable obstacles. It was not a translation from the original Greek
+and Hebrew, for but little was known of either language in the
+fourteenth century: not until the fall of Constantinople into the hands
+of the Turks was Greek or Hebrew studied; so the translation was made
+from the Latin Vulgate of St. Jerome. The version of Wyclif, besides its
+transcendent value to the people, now able to read the Bible in their
+own language (before a sealed book, except to the clergy and the
+learned), gave form and richness to the English language. To what extent
+Wyclif was indebted to the labors of other men it is not easy to
+determine; but there is little doubt that, whatever aid he received, the
+whole work was under his supervision. Of course it was not printed, for
+printing was not then discovered; but the manuscripts of the version
+were very numerous, and they are to-day to be found in the great public
+libraries of England, and even in many private collections.</p>
+
+<p>Considering that the Latin Vulgate has ever been held in supreme
+veneration by the Catholic Church in all ages and countries, by popes,
+bishops, abbots, and schoolmen; that no jealousy existed as to the
+reading of it by the clergy generally; that in fact it was not a sealed
+book to the learned classes, and was regarded universally as the highest
+authority in matters of faith and morals,--it seems strange that so
+violent an opposition should have been made to its translation into
+vernacular tongues, and to its circulation among the people. Wyclif's
+translation was regarded as an act of sacrilege, worthy of condemnation
+and punishment. So furious was the outcry against him, as an audacious
+violator who dared to touch the sacred ark with unconsecrated hands,
+that even a bill was brought into the House of Lords forbidding the
+perusal of the Bible by the laity, and it would have been passed but for
+John of Gaunt. At a convocation of bishops and clerical dignitaries held
+in St. Paul's, in 1408, it was decreed as heresy to read the Bible in
+English,--to be punished by excommunication. The version of Wyclif and
+all other translations into English were utterly prohibited under the
+severest penalties. Fines, imprisonment, and martyrdom were inflicted on
+those who were guilty of so foul a crime as the reading or possession of
+the Scriptures in the vernacular tongue. This is one of the gravest
+charges ever made against the Catholic Church. This absurd and cruel
+persecution alone made the Reformation a necessity, even as the
+translation of the Bible prepared the way for the Reformation. The
+translation of the Scriptures and the Reformation are indissolubly
+linked together. Nobody doubts that the whole influence of the Catholic
+hierarchy has ever been, and still continues to be, hostile to the
+perusal of the Scriptures by the people in the vulgar tongue; and it was
+this translation by Wyclif which made him more obnoxious to the Pope
+than all his tirades against the vices of the monks and the other evils
+which disgraced the Church. We cannot call this translation a reform,
+but it led to reforms: it arrayed the people against the usurpations of
+the Pope and the corruptions of the Church as an institution. Yea, more,
+it was the main cause of that memorable religious movement which
+followed the death of Wyclif: there would have been no Lollards had
+there been no translation of the Bible. It led also to the affirmation
+of that private judgment which was the foundation pillar of
+Protestantism, and which existed among the Lollards long before Luther
+delivered his message.</p>
+
+<p>And yet it is not strange that the Catholic hierarchy (I say Catholic
+rather than Roman, because in the fourteenth century there was but one
+Church, although in that Church considerable difference of opinion
+existed both as to matters of faith and government) should have bitterly
+opposed the translation of the Scriptures into vernacular tongues, since
+it opened the door to private judgment. If there is anything the
+Catholic Church has hated, it is private judgment. The very phrase is
+obnoxious. It means the emancipation of the people from papal domination
+and ecclesiastical bondage of all description; while the thing itself is
+subversive of all the claims which the Catholic hierarchy have ever put
+forth as to the authority of the Church as an institution: it has
+undermined and will continue to undermine spiritual despotism,--the
+great evil of the Middle Ages and of the Papal Church in our times. The
+unrestrained circulation of the Scriptures in the language the people
+can understand must lead to the breaking up of the false doctrines and
+all the instruments by which the clergy have maintained their
+usurpations. It necessarily opens the eyes of the people to the
+antichristian doctrine of penance, to the absurdity of indulgences for
+sin, to the unwarranted worship of the Virgin Mary, to the monstrous
+claim of papal infallibility, and to all other glaring usurpations by
+which the popes have ruled the world. There is not a false doctrine in
+religion, nor an antichristian form of worship, nor a usurped
+prerogative of the Pope and clergy, which the unrestrained perusal of
+the Scriptures does not expose. &quot;<i>Hinc illae lacrymae</i>.&quot; The dignitaries
+of the Roman Catholic Church are not fools. They know that the free
+circulation of the Scriptures in vulgar tongues does undermine their
+authority, and will ultimately destroy the edifice of pride and pomp and
+power which it took a thousand years to build. This is what they ever
+have consistently opposed and will continue to oppose, as a thing
+dangerous to them. They would have destroyed, if they could, every copy
+of the version which Wyclif made. And now, when they can no longer
+prevent the Bible from being printed, they would exclude it from the
+schools which they control, and from the houses of those who belong to
+their Church. Doubtless the well-known opposition to the circulation of
+the Bible in the vernacular has been exaggerated, but in the fourteenth
+century it was certainly bitter and furious. Wyclif might expose vices
+which everybody saw and lamented as a scandal, and make himself
+obnoxious to those who committed them; but to open the door to free
+inquiry and a reformed faith and hostility to the Pope,--this was a
+graver offence, to be visited with the severest penalties. To the storm
+of indignation thus raised against him Wyclif's only answer was: &quot;The
+clergy cry aloud that it is heresy to speak of the Holy Scriptures in
+English, and so they would condemn the Holy Ghost, who gave tongues to
+the Apostles of Christ to speak the Word of God in all languages
+under heaven.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>Notwithstanding the enormous cost of the Bible as translated by
+Wyclif,--&pound;2, 16s. 8d., a sum probably equal to thirty pounds, or one
+hundred and fifty dollars of our present money, more than half the
+annual income of a substantial yeoman,--still it was copied and
+circulated with remarkable rapidity. Neither the cost of the valuable
+manuscript nor the opposition and vigilance of an almost omnipresent
+inquisition were able to suppress it.</p>
+
+<p>Wyclif was now about fifty-eight years of age. He had rendered a
+transcendent service to the English nation, and a service that not one
+of his contemporaries could have performed,--to which only the foremost
+scholar and theologian of his day was equal. After such a work he might
+have reposed in his quiet parish in genial rest, conscious that he had
+opened a new era in the history of his country. But rest was not for
+him. He now appears as a doctrinal controversialist. Hitherto his
+attacks had been against the flagrant external evils of the Church, the
+enormous corruptions that had entered into the institutions which
+sustained the papal power. &quot;He had been the advocate of the University
+in defence of her privileges, the champion of the Crown in vindication
+of its rights and prerogatives, the friend of the people in the
+preservation of their property.... He now assailed the Romish doctrine
+of the eucharist,&quot; but without the support of those powerful princes and
+nobles who had hitherto sustained him. He combats one of the prevailing
+ideas of the age,--a more difficult and infinitely bolder thing,--which
+theologians had not dared to assail, and which in after-times was a
+stumbling-block to Luther himself. In ascending the mysterious mount
+where clouds gathered around him his old friends began to desert him,
+for now he assailed the awful and invisible. The Church of the Middle
+Ages had asserted that the body of Christ was actually present in the
+consecrated wafer, and few there were who doubted it. Berengar had
+maintained in the eleventh century that the sacred elements should be
+regarded as mere symbols; but he was vehemently opposed, with all the
+terrors of spiritual power, and compelled to abjure the heresy. In the
+year 1215, at a Lateran, Council, Innocent III. established the doctrine
+of transubstantiation as one of the fundamental pillars of Catholic
+belief. Then metaphysics--all the weapons of Scholasticism--were called
+into the service of superstition to establish what is most mythical in
+the creed of the Church, and which implied a perpetual miracle, since at
+the moment of consecration the substance of the bread was taken away and
+the substance of Christ's body took its place. From his chair of
+theology at Oxford, in 1381, Wyclif attacked what Lanfranc and Anselm
+and the doctors of the Church had uniformly and strenuously defended.
+His views of the eucharist were substantially those which Archbishop
+Berengar had advanced three hundred years before, and of course drew
+down upon him the censure of the Church. In his peril he appealed, not
+to the Pope or the clergy, but to the King himself,--a measure of
+renewed audacity, for in those days no layman, however exalted, had
+authority in matters purely ecclesiastical. His boldness was too much
+even for the powerful Duke of Lancaster, his friend and patron, who
+forbade him to speak further on such a matter. He might attack the
+mendicant and itinerant friars who had forgotten their duties and their
+vows, but not the great mysteries of the Catholic faith. &quot;When he
+questioned the priestly power of absolution and the Pope's authority in
+purgatory, when he struck at indulgences and special masses, he had on
+his side the spiritual instincts of the people;&quot; but when he impugned
+the dignity of the central act of Christian worship and the highest
+expression of mystical devotion, it appeared to ordinary minds that he
+was denying all that is sacred, impressive, and authoritative in the
+sacrament itself,--and he gave offence to many devout minds, who had
+approved his attacks on the monks and the various corruptions of the
+Church. Even the Parliament pressed the Archbishop to make an end of
+such a heresy; and Courtenay, who hated Wyclif, needed not to be urged.
+So a council was assembled at the Dominican Convent at Blackfriars,
+where the &quot;Times&quot; office now stands, and unanimously condemned not only
+the opinions of Wyclif as to the eucharist, but also those in reference
+to the power of excommunication, and the uselessness of the religious
+orders. Yet he himself was allowed to escape; and the condemnation had
+no other effect than to drive him from Oxford to his rectory at
+Lutterworth, where until his death he occupied himself in literary and
+controversial writings. His illness soon afterwards prevented him from
+obeying the summons of the Pope to Rome, where he would doubtless have
+suffered as a martyr. In 1384 he was struck with paralysis, and died in
+three days after the attack, at the age of sixty,--though some say in
+his sixty-fourth year,--probably, in spite of ecclesiastical censure,
+the most revered man of his day, as well as one of the ablest and most
+learned. Not from the ranks of fanatics or illiterate popular orators
+did the Reformation come in any country, but from the greatest scholars
+and theologians.</p>
+
+<p>This grand old man, the illustrious pioneer of reform in England, and
+indeed on the Continent, did not live to threescore years and ten, but,
+being worn out with his exhaustive labors, he died peaceably and
+unmolested in his retired parish. Not much is known of the details of
+his personal history, any more than of Shakspeare's. We know nothing of
+his loves and hatreds, of his habits and tastes, of his temper and
+person, of his friends and enemies. He stands out to the eye of
+posterity in solitary and mysterious loneliness. Tradition speaks of him
+as a successful, benignant, and charitable parish priest, giving
+consolation to the afflicted and to the sick. He lived in
+honor,--professor of theology at Oxford, holding a prebendal stall and a
+parochial rectory, perhaps a seat in Parliament, and was employed by the
+Crown as an ambassador to Bruges. He was statesman as well as
+theologian, and lived among the great,--more as a learned doctor than as
+a saint, which he was not from the Catholic standpoint. &quot;He was the
+scourge of imposture, the ponderous hammer which smote the brazen
+idolatry of his age.&quot; He labored to expose the vices that had taken
+shelter in the sanctuary of the Church,--a reformer of ecclesiastical
+abuses rather than of the lax morals of the laity, and hence did
+different work from that of Savonarola, whose life was spent in a
+crusade against sin, wherever it was to be found. His labors were great,
+and his attainments remarkable for his age. He is accused of being
+coarse in his invectives; but that charge can also be laid to Luther and
+other reformers in rough and outspoken times. Considering the power of
+the Pope in the fourteenth century, Wyclif was as bold and courageous as
+Luther. The weakness of the papacy had not been exposed by the Councils
+of Pisa, of Constance, and of Basil; nor was popular indignation in view
+of the sale of indulgences as great in England as when the Dominican
+Tetzel peddled the papal pardons in Germany. In combating the received
+ideas of the age, Wyclif was even more remarkable than the Saxon
+reformer, who was never fully emancipated from the Mediaeval doctrine of
+transubstantiation; although Luther went beyond Wyclif in the
+completeness of his reform. Wyclif was beyond his age; Luther was the
+impersonation of its passions. Wyclif represented universities and
+learned men; Luther was the oracle of the people. The former was the
+Mediaeval doctor; the latter was the popular orator and preacher. The
+one was mild and moderate in his spirit and manners; the other was
+vehement, dogmatic, and often offensive, not only from his more violent
+and passionate nature, but for his bitter and ironical sallies. It is
+the manner more than the matter which offends. Had Wyclif been as
+satirical and boisterous as Luther was, he would not probably have ended
+his days in peace, and would not have accomplished so much as a
+preparation for reforms.</p>
+
+<p>It was the peculiarity of Wyclif to recognize occasional merits in the
+system he denounced, even when his language was most vehement. He
+admitted that confession did much good to some persons, although as a
+universal practice, as enjoined by Innocent III., it was an evil and
+harmed the Church. In regard to the worship of images, while he
+denounced the waste of treasure on &quot;dead stocks,&quot; he admitted that
+images might be used as aids to excite devotion; but if miraculous
+powers were attributed to them, it was an evil rather than a good. And
+as to the adoration of the saints, he simply maintained that since gifts
+can be obtained only through the mediation of Christ, it would be better
+to pray to him directly rather than through the mediation of saints.</p>
+
+<p>In regard to the Mendicant friars, it does not appear that his vehement
+opposition to them was based on their vows of poverty or on the spirit
+which entered into monasticism in its best ages, but because they were
+untrue to their rule, because they were vendors of pardons, and
+absolved men of sins which they were ashamed to confess to their own
+pastors, and especially because they encouraged the belief that a
+benefaction to a convent would take the place of piety in the heart. It
+was the abuses of the system, rather than the system itself, which made
+him so wrathful on the &quot;vagrant friars preaching their catchpenny
+sermons.&quot; And so of other abuses of the Church: he did not defy the Pope
+or deny his authority until it was plain that he sought to usurp the
+prerogatives of kings and secular rulers, and bring both the clergy and
+laity under his spiritual yoke. It was not as the first and chief of
+bishops--the head of the visible Church--that Wyclif attacked the Pope,
+but as a usurper and a tyrant, grasping powers which were not conferred
+by the early Church, and which did not culminate until Innocent III. had
+instituted the Mendicant orders, and enforced persecution for religious
+opinions by the terrors of the Inquisition. The wealth of the Church was
+a sore evil in his eyes, since it diverted the clergy from their
+spiritual duties, and was the cause of innumerable scandals, and was
+closely connected with simony and the accumulation of benefices in the
+hands of a single priest.</p>
+
+<p>So it was indignation in view of the corruptions of the Church and
+vehement attacks upon them which characterized Wyclif, rather than
+efforts to remove their causes, as was the case with Luther. He was not
+a radical reformer; he only prepared the way for radical reform, by his
+translation of the Scriptures into a language the people could read,
+more than by any attacks on the monks or papal usurpations or
+indulgences for sin. He was the type of a meditative scholar and
+theologian, thin and worn, without much charm of conversation except to
+men of rank, or great animal vivacity such as delights the people. Nor
+was he a religious genius, like Thomas &agrave; Kempis, Anselm, and Pascal. He
+had no remarkable insight into spiritual things; his intellectual and
+moral nature preponderated over the emotional, so that he was charged
+with intellectual pride and desire for distinction. Yet no one disputed
+the blamelessness of his life and the elevation of his character.</p>
+
+<p>If Wyclif escaped the wrath and vengeance of Rome because of his high
+rank as a theological doctor, his connection with the University of
+Oxford, opposed to itinerating beggars with great pretensions and greedy
+ends, and his friendship and intercourse with the rulers of the land,
+his followers did not. They became very numerous, and were variously
+called Lollards, Wyclifites, and Biblemen. They kept alive evangelical
+religion until the time of Cranmer and Latimer, their distinguishing
+doctrine being that the Scriptures are the only rule of faith. There was
+no persecution of them of any account during the reign of Richard
+II.,--although he was a hateful tyrant,--probably owing to the
+influence of his wife, a Bohemian princess, who read Wyclif's Bible;
+but under Henry IV. evil days fell upon them, and persecution was
+intensified under Henry V. (1413-1422) because of their supposed
+rebellion. The Lollards under Archbishop Chicheley, as early as 1416,
+were hunted down and burned as heretics. The severest inquisition was
+instituted to hunt up those who were even suspected of heresy, and every
+parish was the scene of cruelties. I need not here enumerate the victims
+of persecution, continued with remorseless severity during the whole
+reign of Henry VII. But it was impossible to suppress the opinions of
+the reformers, or to prevent the circulation of the Scriptures. The
+blood of martyrs was the seed of the Church. Persecution in this
+instance was not successful, since there was a noble material in
+England, as in Germany, for Christianity to work upon. It was in humble
+homes, among the yeomanry and the artisans, that evangelical truth took
+the deepest hold, as in primitive times, and produced the fervent
+Christians of succeeding centuries, such as no other country has
+produced. In no country was the Reformation, as established by Edward
+VI. and Elizabeth, so complete and so permanent, unless Scotland and
+Switzerland be excepted. The glory of this radical reform must be
+ascribed to the humble and persecuted followers of Wyclif,--who proved
+themselves martyrs and witnesses, faithful unto death,--more than to
+any of the great lights which adorned the most brilliant period of
+English history.</p>
+
+<p>AUTHORITIES.</p>
+
+<p>The Works of Wyclif, as edited by F.D. Matthew; The Life and Sufferings
+of Wicklif, by I. Lewis (Oxford, 1820); Life of Wiclif, by Charles Wehle
+Le Bas (1846); John de Wycliffe, a Monograph, by Robert Vaughan, D.D.
+(London, 1853); Turner's History of England should be compared with
+Lingard. Mosheim's Ecclesiastical History; Neander's Church History;
+Wordsworth's Ecclesiastical Biography; Gieseler, Milner, and general
+historians of the Church; Geikie's English Reformation. A German Life of
+Wyclif, by Dr. Lechler, is often quoted by Matthew, and has been
+fortunately translated into English. There is also a slight notice of
+Wyclif by Fisher, in his History of the Reformation.</p>
+
+<p>The name of the English reformer is spelled differently by different
+historians,--as Wiclif, Wyclif, Wycliffe, Wyckliffe; but I have selected
+the latest authority upon the subject, F.D. Matthew.</p>
+<br>
+<hr class="full">
+<pre>
+
+***END OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK BEACON LIGHTS OF HISTORY, VOLUME V***
+
+******* This file should be named 10531-h.txt or 10531-h.zip *******
+
+This and all associated files of various formats will be found in:<br />
+<a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/1/0/5/3/10531">https://www.gutenberg.org/1/0/5/3/10531</a>
+
+Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions
+will be renamed.
+
+Creating the works from public domain print editions means that no
+one owns a United States copyright in these works, so the Foundation
+(and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United States without
+permission and without paying copyright royalties. Special rules,
+set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license, apply to
+copying and distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works to
+protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm concept and trademark. Project
+Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if you
+charge for the eBooks, unless you receive specific permission. If you
+do not charge anything for copies of this eBook, complying with the
+rules is very easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose
+such as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and
+research. They may be modified and printed and given away--you may do
+practically ANYTHING with public domain eBooks. Redistribution is
+subject to the trademark license, especially commercial
+redistribution.
+
+
+
+
+*** START: FULL LICENSE ***
+
+THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE
+PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK
+
+To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free
+distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work
+(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project
+Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full Project
+Gutenberg-tm License (available with this file or online at
+<a href="https://gutenberg.org/license">https://gutenberg.org/license)</a>.
+
+
+Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic works
+
+1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to
+and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property
+(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all
+the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or destroy
+all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your possession.
+If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the
+terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or
+entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8.
+
+1.B. "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark. It may only be
+used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who
+agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few
+things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works
+even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See
+paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement
+and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
+works. See paragraph 1.E below.
+
+1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the Foundation"
+or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection of Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic works. Nearly all the individual works in the
+collection are in the public domain in the United States. If an
+individual work is in the public domain in the United States and you are
+located in the United States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from
+copying, distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative
+works based on the work as long as all references to Project Gutenberg
+are removed. Of course, we hope that you will support the Project
+Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting free access to electronic works by
+freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm works in compliance with the terms of
+this agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with
+the work. You can easily comply with the terms of this agreement by
+keeping this work in the same format with its attached full Project
+Gutenberg-tm License when you share it without charge with others.
+
+1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern
+what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are in
+a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States, check
+the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this agreement
+before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, distributing or
+creating derivative works based on this work or any other Project
+Gutenberg-tm work. The Foundation makes no representations concerning
+the copyright status of any work in any country outside the United
+States.
+
+1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg:
+
+1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate
+access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear prominently
+whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work on which the
+phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the phrase "Project
+Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed, viewed,
+copied or distributed:
+
+This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with
+almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or
+re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included
+with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org
+
+1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is derived
+from the public domain (does not contain a notice indicating that it is
+posted with permission of the copyright holder), the work can be copied
+and distributed to anyone in the United States without paying any fees
+or charges. If you are redistributing or providing access to a work
+with the phrase "Project Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the
+work, you must comply either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1
+through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the
+Project Gutenberg-tm trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or
+1.E.9.
+
+1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted
+with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution
+must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any additional
+terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms will be linked
+to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works posted with the
+permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of this work.
+
+1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this
+work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm.
+
+1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this
+electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without
+prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with
+active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project
+Gutenberg-tm License.
+
+1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary,
+compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including any
+word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access to or
+distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format other than
+"Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official version
+posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm web site (www.gutenberg.org),
+you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a
+copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon
+request, of the work in its original "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other
+form. Any alternate format must include the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1.
+
+1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying,
+performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works
+unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.
+
+1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing
+access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works provided
+that
+
+- You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from
+ the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method
+ you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is
+ owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he
+ has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the
+ Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments
+ must be paid within 60 days following each date on which you
+ prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your periodic tax
+ returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked as such and
+ sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the
+ address specified in Section 4, "Information about donations to
+ the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation."
+
+- You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies
+ you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he
+ does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+ License. You must require such a user to return or
+ destroy all copies of the works possessed in a physical medium
+ and discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of
+ Project Gutenberg-tm works.
+
+- You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any
+ money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the
+ electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days
+ of receipt of the work.
+
+- You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
+ distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works.
+
+1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set
+forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from
+both the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and Michael
+Hart, the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark. Contact the
+Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below.
+
+1.F.
+
+1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable
+effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread
+public domain works in creating the Project Gutenberg-tm
+collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
+works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may contain
+"Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or
+corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual
+property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other medium, a
+computer virus, or computer codes that damage or cannot be read by
+your equipment.
+
+1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right
+of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project
+Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project
+Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all
+liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal
+fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT
+LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE
+PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH F3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE
+TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE
+LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR
+INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH
+DAMAGE.
+
+1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a
+defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can
+receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a
+written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you
+received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium with
+your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you with
+the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu of a
+refund. If you received the work electronically, the person or entity
+providing it to you may choose to give you a second opportunity to
+receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If the second copy
+is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing without further
+opportunities to fix the problem.
+
+1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth
+in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS," WITH NO OTHER
+WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO
+WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTIBILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.
+
+1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied
+warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages.
+If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the
+law of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be
+interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by
+the applicable state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any
+provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions.
+
+1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the
+trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone
+providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in accordance
+with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the production,
+promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works,
+harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees,
+that arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do
+or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg-tm
+work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or deletions to any
+Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any Defect you cause.
+
+
+Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of
+electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of computers
+including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It exists
+because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations from
+people in all walks of life.
+
+Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the
+assistance they need, is critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's
+goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will
+remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project
+Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure
+and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future generations.
+To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation
+and how your efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4
+and the Foundation web page at https://www.pglaf.org.
+
+
+Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
+Foundation
+
+The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non profit
+501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the
+state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal
+Revenue Service. The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification
+number is 64-6221541. Its 501(c)(3) letter is posted at
+https://pglaf.org/fundraising. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg
+Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent
+permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state's laws.
+
+The Foundation's principal office is located at 4557 Melan Dr. S.
+Fairbanks, AK, 99712., but its volunteers and employees are scattered
+throughout numerous locations. Its business office is located at
+809 North 1500 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887, email
+business@pglaf.org. Email contact links and up to date contact
+information can be found at the Foundation's web site and official
+page at https://pglaf.org
+
+For additional contact information:
+ Dr. Gregory B. Newby
+ Chief Executive and Director
+ gbnewby@pglaf.org
+
+Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg
+Literary Archive Foundation
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without wide
+spread public support and donations to carry out its mission of
+increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be
+freely distributed in machine readable form accessible by the widest
+array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations
+($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt
+status with the IRS.
+
+The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating
+charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United
+States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a
+considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up
+with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations
+where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To
+SEND DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any
+particular state visit https://pglaf.org
+
+While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we
+have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition
+against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who
+approach us with offers to donate.
+
+International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make
+any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from
+outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff.
+
+Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation
+methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other
+ways including including checks, online payments and credit card
+donations. To donate, please visit: https://pglaf.org/donate
+
+
+Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
+works.
+
+Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project Gutenberg-tm
+concept of a library of electronic works that could be freely shared
+with anyone. For thirty years, he produced and distributed Project
+Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer support.
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed
+editions, all of which are confirmed as Public Domain in the U.S.
+unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not necessarily
+keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper edition.
+
+Each eBook is in a subdirectory of the same number as the eBook's
+eBook number, often in several formats including plain vanilla ASCII,
+compressed (zipped), HTML and others.
+
+Corrected EDITIONS of our eBooks replace the old file and take over
+the old filename and etext number. The replaced older file is renamed.
+VERSIONS based on separate sources are treated as new eBooks receiving
+new filenames and etext numbers.
+
+Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search facility:
+
+<a href="https://www.gutenberg.org">https://www.gutenberg.org</a>
+
+This Web site includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm,
+including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary
+Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to
+subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks.
+
+EBooks posted prior to November 2003, with eBook numbers BELOW #10000,
+are filed in directories based on their release date. If you want to
+download any of these eBooks directly, rather than using the regular
+search system you may utilize the following addresses and just
+download by the etext year.
+
+<a href="http://www.ibiblio.org/gutenberg/etext06">http://www.ibiblio.org/gutenberg/etext06</a>
+
+ (Or /etext 05, 04, 03, 02, 01, 00, 99,
+ 98, 97, 96, 95, 94, 93, 92, 92, 91 or 90)
+
+EBooks posted since November 2003, with etext numbers OVER #10000, are
+filed in a different way. The year of a release date is no longer part
+of the directory path. The path is based on the etext number (which is
+identical to the filename). The path to the file is made up of single
+digits corresponding to all but the last digit in the filename. For
+example an eBook of filename 10234 would be found at:
+
+https://www.gutenberg.org/1/0/2/3/10234
+
+or filename 24689 would be found at:
+https://www.gutenberg.org/2/4/6/8/24689
+
+An alternative method of locating eBooks:
+<a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/GUTINDEX.ALL">https://www.gutenberg.org/GUTINDEX.ALL</a>
+
+*** END: FULL LICENSE ***
+</pre>
+</body>
+</html>
diff --git a/10531-h/Illus0406.jpg b/10531-h/Illus0406.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..67451d0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/10531-h/Illus0406.jpg
Binary files differ
diff --git a/10531-h/Illus0407.jpg b/10531-h/Illus0407.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..af63568
--- /dev/null
+++ b/10531-h/Illus0407.jpg
Binary files differ
diff --git a/10531-h/Illus0408.jpg b/10531-h/Illus0408.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..468f341
--- /dev/null
+++ b/10531-h/Illus0408.jpg
Binary files differ
diff --git a/10531-h/Illus0409.jpg b/10531-h/Illus0409.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..eef3197
--- /dev/null
+++ b/10531-h/Illus0409.jpg
Binary files differ
diff --git a/10531-h/Illus0410.jpg b/10531-h/Illus0410.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..180f54c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/10531-h/Illus0410.jpg
Binary files differ
diff --git a/10531-h/Illus0411.jpg b/10531-h/Illus0411.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..c2f0d61
--- /dev/null
+++ b/10531-h/Illus0411.jpg
Binary files differ
diff --git a/10531-h/Illus0412.jpg b/10531-h/Illus0412.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..e5affbc
--- /dev/null
+++ b/10531-h/Illus0412.jpg
Binary files differ
diff --git a/10531-h/Illus0413.jpg b/10531-h/Illus0413.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..1eedb53
--- /dev/null
+++ b/10531-h/Illus0413.jpg
Binary files differ
diff --git a/10531-h/Illus0414.jpg b/10531-h/Illus0414.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..401fa31
--- /dev/null
+++ b/10531-h/Illus0414.jpg
Binary files differ
diff --git a/10531-h/Illus0415.jpg b/10531-h/Illus0415.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..3b28f83
--- /dev/null
+++ b/10531-h/Illus0415.jpg
Binary files differ
diff --git a/10531-h/Illus0416.jpg b/10531-h/Illus0416.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..8286611
--- /dev/null
+++ b/10531-h/Illus0416.jpg
Binary files differ