diff options
45 files changed, 11837 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/.gitattributes b/.gitattributes new file mode 100644 index 0000000..6833f05 --- /dev/null +++ b/.gitattributes @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +* text=auto +*.txt text +*.md text diff --git a/77011-0.txt b/77011-0.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..cab6c4c --- /dev/null +++ b/77011-0.txt @@ -0,0 +1,5606 @@ + +*** START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK 77011 *** + + + + + + THE ORGANISATION + OF THOUGHT + + + + + THE ORGANISATION + OF THOUGHT + + EDUCATIONAL AND SCIENTIFIC + + + + + BY + A. N. WHITEHEAD, Sc.D., F.R.S. + + FELLOW OF TRINITY COLLEGE, CAMBRIDGE, AND PROFESSOR OF + APPLIED MATHEMATICS AT THE IMPERIAL COLLEGE OF + SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY + + + + + LONDON + WILLIAMS AND NORGATE + 14 HENRIETTA STREET, COVENT GARDEN, W.C.2 + 1917 + + + _The rights of translation are reserved_ + + + + + PREFACE + + +THE discourses included in this volume have been delivered as addresses +on various occasions which are duly noted; the only exception is +_The Anatomy of Some Scientific Ideas_, which is now published +for the first time. These discourses fall into two sections, the first +five chapters deal with education, and the remaining three embody +discussions on certain points arising in the philosophy of science. +But a common line of reflection extends through the whole, and the two +sections influence each other. + +I have left in each chapter the reference to the particular occasion of +its first production, and I have not sought for a verbal consistency +covering perplexity. But the various parts of the book were in fact +composed with express reference to each other, so as to form one whole. + +I have to thank the Syndics of the Cambridge University Press for +permission to republish the contents of Chapter V. + +_Imperial College of Science and Technology,_ +_April 1917._ + + + + + TABLE OF CONTENTS + + +CHAP. PAGE + + PREFACE v + + I. THE AIMS OF EDUCATION--A PLEA FOR REFORM 1 + (Presidential Address to the Mathematical Association, + January, 1916.) + + II. TECHNICAL EDUCATION AND ITS RELATION TO + SCIENCE AND LITERATURE 29 + (Presidential Address to the Mathematical Association, + January, 1917.) + + III. A POLYTECHNIC IN WAR-TIME 58 + (Address at the Prize Distribution, Borough Polytechnic + Institute, Southwark, February, 1917.) + + IV. THE MATHEMATICAL CURRICULUM 69 + (Presidential Address to the London Branch of the + Mathematical Association, 1912.) + + V. THE PRINCIPLES OF MATHEMATICS IN RELATION + TO ELEMENTARY TEACHING 92 + (Paper read in the Educational Section of the International + Congress of Mathematicians, Cambridge, + 1912.) + + VI. THE ORGANISATION OF THOUGHT 105 + (Presidential Address to Section A, British Association, + Newcastle, 1916; also read subsequently before the + Aristotelian Society.) + + VII. THE ANATOMY OF SOME SCIENTIFIC IDEAS 134 + + VIII. SPACE, TIME, AND RELATIVITY 191 + (Paper read to Section A at the Manchester Meeting of + Section A, 1915; also, with the appended Commentary, + read subsequently before the Aristotelian + Society.) + + + + + ORGANISATION OF THOUGHT + + + + + CHAPTER I + + THE AIMS OF EDUCATION--A PLEA FOR REFORM + + (_Presidential Address to the Mathematical Association, January, + 1916_) + + +WHEN I had the honour of being made President of the Mathematical +Association, I did not foresee the unusual responsibility which it +entailed. It was my intention to take as the theme of a presidential +address the consideration of some aspect of those special subjects to +which my own researches have principally been directed. Events have +forced me to abandon that intention. It is useless to discuss abstract +questions in the midst of dominant practical preoccupation. We cannot +disregard the present crisis in European civilisation. It affects every +function of life. In the harder struggle for existence which lies +before the nation, all departments of national effort will be reviewed +for judgment. The mere necessity for economy in resources will provoke +this reformation. + +We are concerned with education. This Association, so rich in its +membership of educationalists, with the conception of reform as the +very reason of its being, is among those bodies which must take the +lead in guiding that educational reconstruction which by a sociological +law follows every social revolution. We do not want impracticable +ideals, only to be realised beyond the clouds in + + "Some wild, weird clime, + Out of Space, and out of Time." + +We require to know what is possible now in England, a nation conscious +of its high achievements, and of great failures, shaken to its +foundations, distrustful of the old ways, and dreading fantastic +novelties. + +I will take my courage in both hands, and put before you an outline of +educational principles. What I am going to say is of course entirely +without your authority, and does not pledge or prejudge any action of +the Association. We are primarily concerned only with the intellectual +side of education, and, as mathematicians, are naturally concerned to +illustrate details more particularly by reference to mathematics. Thus +much to explain deliberate omissions in what follows. + +Consider now the general and special education of two types of boys, +namely those in secondary schools who in after life must form the +professional and directing classes in commerce, industry, and public +administration, and again those in junior technical schools and later +in advanced continuation classes, who are going to form the class of +skilled artisans and foremen of workshops. These two sets compose the +educated strength of the nation. We must form no ideals which include +less than these entire classes within their scope. What I shall say, +will in phraseology apply more directly to the secondary schools, but +with unessential changes it will apply equally to the other group. + +What is the first commandment to be obeyed in any educational scheme? +It is this: Do not teach too many subjects. The second command is this: +What you teach, teach thoroughly. The devil in the scholastic world +has assumed the form of a general education consisting of scraps of a +large number of disconnected subjects; and, with the artfulness of the +serpent, he has entrenched himself behind the matriculation examination +of the University of London, with a wire entanglement formed by the +Oxford and Cambridge schools' examination. + +Culture is activity of thought, and receptiveness to beauty, and humane +feeling. Scraps of information have nothing to do with it. A merely +well-informed man is the most useless bore on God's earth. What we +should aim at producing is men who possess both culture and expert +knowledge in some special direction. Their expert knowledge will give +them the ground to start from, and their culture will lead them as deep +as philosophy and as high as art. We have to remember that the valuable +intellectual development is self-development, and that it mostly takes +place between the ages of sixteen and thirty. As to training, the most +important part is given by mothers before the age of twelve. A saying +due to Archbishop Temple illustrates my meaning. Surprise was expressed +at the success in after-life of a man, who as a boy at Rugby had been +somewhat undistinguished. He answered, "It is not what they are at +eighteen, it is what they become afterwards that matters." + +In training a child to activity of thought, above all things we must +beware of what I will call "inert ideas"--that is to say, ideas that +are merely received into the mind without being utilised, or tested, or +thrown into fresh combinations. + +In the history of education, the most striking phenomenon is that +schools of learning, which at one epoch are alive with a ferment of +genius, in a succeeding generation exhibit merely pedantry and routine. +The reason is, that they are overladen with inert ideas. Education +with inert ideas is not only useless: it is, above all things, +harmful--_Corruptio optimi, pessima_. Except at rare intervals +of intellectual ferment, education in the past has been radically +infected with inert ideas. That is the reason why uneducated clever +women, who have seen much of the world, are in middle life so much +the most cultured part of the community. They have been saved from +this horrible burden of inert ideas. Every intellectual revolution +which has ever stirred humanity into greatness has been a passionate +protest against inert ideas. Then, alas, with pathetic ignorance of +human psychology, it has proceeded by some educational scheme to bind +humanity afresh with inert ideas of its own fashioning. + +Let us now ask how in our system of education we are to guard against +this mental dry rot. We recur to our two educational commandments, +"Do not teach too many subjects," and again, "What you teach, teach +thoroughly." + +The result of teaching small parts of a large number of subjects is the +passive reception of disconnected ideas, not illumined with any spark +of vitality. Let the main ideas which are introduced into a child's +education be few and important, and let them be thrown into every +combination possible. The child should make them his own, and should +understand their application here and now in the circumstances of his +actual life. From the very beginning of his education, the child should +experience the joy of discovery. The discovery which he has to make, +is that general ideas give an understanding of that stream of events +which pours through his life, which is his life. By understanding I +mean more than a mere logical analysis, though that is included. I mean +"understanding" in the sense in which it is used in the French proverb, +"To understand all, is to forgive all." Pedants sneer at an education +which is useful. But if education is not useful, what is it? Is it a +talent, to be hidden away in a napkin? Of course, education should be +useful, whatever your aim in life. It was useful to Saint Augustine +and it was useful to Napoleon. It is useful, because understanding is +useful. + +I pass lightly over that understanding which should be given by the +literary side of education. It is not peculiarly the function of this +Association to consider it. Nor do I wish to be supposed to pronounce +on the relative merits of a classical or a modern curriculum. I would +only remark that the understanding which we want is an understanding +of an insistent present. The only use of a knowledge of the past +is to equip us for the present. No more deadly harm can be done to +young minds than by depreciation of the present. The present contains +all that there is. It is holy ground; for it is the past, and it is +the future. At the same time it must be observed that an age is no +less past if it existed two hundred years ago than if it existed two +thousand years ago. Do not be deceived by the pedantry of dates. The +ages of Shakespeare and of Molière are no less past than are the ages +of Sophocles and of Virgil. The communion of saints is a great and +inspiring assemblage, but it has only one possible hall of meeting, +and that is, the present; and the mere lapse of time through which any +particular group of saints must travel to reach that meeting-place, +makes very little difference. + +Passing now to the scientific and logical side of education, we +remember that here also ideas which are not utilised are positively +harmful. By utilising an idea, I mean relating it to that stream, +compounded of sense perceptions, feelings, hopes, desires, and of +mental activities relating thought to thought, which forms our life. +I can imagine a set of beings which might fortify their souls by +passively reviewing disconnected ideas. Humanity is not built that +way--except perhaps some editors of newspapers. + +In scientific training, the first thing to do with an idea is to prove +it. But allow me for one moment to extend the meaning of "prove"; I +mean--to prove its worth. Now an idea is not worth much unless the +propositions in which it is embodied are true. Accordingly an essential +part of the proof of an idea is the proof, either by experiment or by +logic, of the truth of the propositions. But it is not essential that +this proof of the truth should constitute the first introduction to +the idea. After all, its assertion by the authority of respectable +teachers is sufficient evidence to begin with. In our first contact +with a set of propositions, we commence by appreciating their +importance. That is what we all do in after-life. We do not attempt, +in the strict sense, to prove or to disprove anything, unless its +importance makes it worthy of that honour. These two processes of +proof, in the narrow sense, and of appreciation do not require a rigid +separation in time. Both can be proceeded with nearly concurrently. But +in so far as either process must have the priority, it should be that +of appreciation by use. + +Furthermore, we should not endeavour to use propositions in isolation. +Emphatically I do not mean, a neat little set of experiments to +illustrate Proposition I and then the proof of Proposition I, a neat +little set of experiments to illustrate Proposition II and then the +proof of Proposition II, and so on to the end of the book. Nothing +could be more boring. Inter-related truths are utilised _en bloc_, +and the various propositions are employed in any order, and with any +reiteration. Choose some important applications of your theoretical +subject; and study them concurrently with the systematic theoretical +exposition. Keep the theoretical exposition short and simple, but +let it be strict and rigid so far as it goes. It should not be too +long for it easily to be known with thoroughness and accuracy. The +consequences of a plethora of half-digested theoretical knowledge are +deplorable. Also the theory should not be muddled up with the practice. +The child should have no doubt when it is proving and when it is +utilising. My point is that what is proved should be utilised, and that +what is utilised should--so far as is practicable--be proved. I am far +from asserting that proof and utilisation are the same thing. + +At this point of my discourse, I can most directly carry forward +my argument in the outward form of a digression. We are only just +realising that the art and science of education require a genius and +a study of their own; and that this genius and this science are more +than a bare knowledge of some branch of science or of literature. This +truth was partially perceived in the past generation; and headmasters, +somewhat crudely, were apt to supersede learning in their colleagues +by requiring left-hand bowling and a taste for football. But culture +is more than cricket, and more than football, and more than extent of +knowledge. + +Education is the acquisition of the art of the utilisation of +knowledge. This is an art very difficult to impart. Whenever a +text-book is written of real educational worth, you may be quite +certain that some reviewer will say that it will be difficult to +teach from it. Of course it will be difficult to teach from it. If it +were easy, the book ought to be burned; for it cannot be educational. +In education, as elsewhere, the broad primrose path leads to a nasty +place. This evil path is represented by a book or a set of lectures +which will practically enable the student to learn by heart all the +questions likely to be asked at the next external examination. And I +may say in passing that no educational system is possible unless every +question directly asked of a pupil at any examination is either framed +or modified by the actual teacher of that pupil in that subject. The +external assessor may report on the curriculum or on the performance +of the pupils, but never should be allowed to ask the pupil a question +which has not been strictly supervised by the actual teacher, or +at least inspired by a long conference with him. There are a few +exceptions to this rule, but they are exceptions, and could easily be +allowed for under the general rule. + +We now return to my previous point, that theoretical ideas should +always find important applications within the pupil's curriculum. This +is not an easy doctrine to apply, but a very hard one. It contains +within itself the problem of keeping knowledge alive, of preventing it +from becoming inert, which is the central problem of all education. + +The best procedure will depend on several factors, none of which can +be neglected, namely, the genius of the teacher, the intellectual type +of the pupils, their prospects in life, the opportunities offered by +the immediate surroundings of the school, and allied factors of this +sort. It is for this reason that the uniform external examination +is so deadly. We do not denounce it because we are cranks, and like +denouncing established things. We are not so childish. Also, of course, +such examinations have their use in testing slackness. Our reason of +dislike is very definite and very practical. It kills the best part of +culture. When you analyse in the light of experience the central task +of education, you find that its successful accomplishment depends on a +delicate adjustment of many variable factors. The reason is that we are +dealing with human minds, and not with dead matter. The evocation of +curiosity, of judgment, of the power of mastering a complicated tangle +of circumstances, the use of theory in giving foresight in special +cases--all these powers are not to be imparted by a set rule embodied +in one schedule of examination subjects. + +I appeal to you, as practical teachers. With good discipline, it is +always possible to pump into the minds of a class a certain quantity of +inert knowledge. You take a text-book and make them learn it. So far, +so good. The child then knows how to solve a quadratic equation. But +what is the point of teaching a child to solve a quadratic equation? +There is a traditional answer to this question. It runs thus: The +mind is an instrument, you first sharpen it, and then use it; the +acquisition of the power of solving a quadratic equation is part of +the process of sharpening the mind. Now there is just enough truth in +this answer to have made it live through the ages. But for all its +half-truth, it embodies a radical error which bids fair to stifle the +genius of the modern world. I do not know who was first responsible +for this analogy of the mind to a dead instrument. For aught I know, +it may have been one of the seven wise men of Greece, or a committee +of the whole lot of them. Whoever was the originator, there can be no +doubt of the authority which it has acquired by the continuous approval +which it has received from eminent persons. But whatever its weight of +authority, whatever the high approval which it can quote, I have no +hesitation in denouncing it as one of the most fatal, erroneous, and +dangerous conceptions ever introduced into the theory of education. The +mind is never passive; it is a perpetual activity, delicate, receptive, +responsive to stimulus. You cannot postpone its life until you have +sharpened it. Whatever interest attaches to your subject-matter, must +be evoked here and now; whatever powers you are strengthening in the +pupil, must be exercised here and now; whatever possibilities of mental +life your teaching should impart, must be exhibited here and now. That +is the golden rule of education, and a very difficult rule to follow. + +The difficulty is just this: the apprehension of general ideas, +intellectual habits of mind, and pleasurable interest in mental +achievement can be evoked by no form of words, however accurately +adjusted. All practical teachers know that education is a patient +process of the mastery of details, minute by minute, hour by hour, day +by day. There is no royal road to learning through an airy path of +brilliant generalisations. There is a proverb about the difficulty of +seeing the wood because of the trees. That difficulty is exactly the +point which I am enforcing. The problem of education is to make the +pupil see the wood by means of the trees. + +The solution which I am urging, is to eradicate the fatal disconnection +of subjects which kills the vitality of our modern curriculum. +There is only one subject-matter for education, and that is Life +in all its manifestations. Instead of this single unity, we offer +children--Algebra, from which nothing follows; Geometry, from which +nothing follows; Science, from which nothing follows; History, from +which nothing follows; a Couple of Languages, never mastered; and +lastly, most dreary of all, Literature, represented by plays of +Shakespeare, with philological notes and short analyses of plot and +character to be in substance committed to memory. Can such a list be +said to represent Life, as it is known in the midst of the living of +it? The best that can be said of it is, that it is a rapid table of +contents which a deity might run over in his mind while he was thinking +of creating a world, and had not yet determined how to put it together. + +Let us now return to quadratic equations. We still have on hand the +unanswered question. Why should children be taught their solution? +Unless quadratic equations fit into a connected curriculum, of course +there is no reason to teach anything about them. Furthermore, extensive +as should be the place of mathematics in a complete culture, I am a +little doubtful whether for many types of boys algebraic solutions of +quadratic equations do not lie on the specialist side of mathematics. +I may here remind you that as yet I have not said anything of the +psychology or the content of the specialism, which is so necessary a +part of an ideal education. But all that is an evasion of our real +question, and I merely state it in order to avoid being misunderstood +in my answer. + +Quadratic equations are part of algebra, and algebra is the +intellectual instrument which has been created for rendering clear +the quantitative aspects of the world. There is no getting out of +it. Through and through the world is infected with quantity. To talk +sense, is to talk in quantities. It is no use saying that the nation +is large,--How large? It is no use saying that radium is scarce,--How +scarce? You cannot evade quantity. You may fly to poetry and to music, +and quantity and number will face you in your rhythms and your octaves. +Elegant intellects which despise the theory of quantity, are but half +developed. They are more to be pitied than blamed. The scraps of +gibberish, which in their school-days were taught to them in the name +of algebra, deserve some contempt. + +This question of the degeneration of algebra into gibberish, both in +word and in fact, affords a pathetic instance of the uselessness of +reforming educational schedules without a clear conception of the +attributes which you wish to evoke in the living minds of the children. +A few years ago there was an outcry that school algebra was in need +of reform, but there was a general agreement that graphs would put +everything right. So all sorts of things were extruded, and graphs were +introduced. So far as I can see, with no sort of idea behind them, +but just graphs. Now every examination paper has one or two questions +on graphs. Personally, I am an enthusiastic adherent of graphs. But I +wonder whether as yet we have gained very much. You cannot put life +into any schedule of general education unless you succeed in exhibiting +its relation to some essential characteristic of all intelligent or +emotional perception. It is a hard saying, but it is true; and I do +not see how to make it any easier. In making these little formal +alterations you are beaten by the very nature of things. You are pitted +against too skilful an adversary, who will see to it that the pea is +always under the other thimble. + +Reformation must begin at the other end. First, you must make up your +mind as to those quantitative aspects of the world which are simple +enough to be introduced into general education; then a schedule of +algebra should be framed which will about find its exemplification in +these applications. We need not fear for our pet graphs, they will +be there in plenty when we once begin to treat algebra as a serious +means of studying the world. Some of the simplest applications will be +found in the quantities which occur in the simplest study of society. +The curves of history are more vivid and more informing than the dry +catalogues of names and dates which comprise the greater part of +that arid school study. What purpose is effected by a catalogue of +undistinguished kings and queens? Tom, Dick, or Harry, they are all +dead. General resurrections are failures, and are better postponed. +The quantitative flux of the forces of modern society are capable +of very simple exhibition. Meanwhile, the idea of the variable, of +the function, of rate of change, of equations and their solution, of +elimination, are being studied as an abstract science for their own +sake. Not, of course, in the pompous phrases with which I am alluding +to them here, but with that iteration of simple special cases proper to +teaching. + +If this course be followed, the route from Chaucer to the Black Death, +from the Black Death to modern Labour troubles, will connect the tales +of the mediæval pilgrims with the abstract science of algebra, both +yielding diverse aspects of that single theme, Life. I know what most +of you are thinking at this point. It is that the exact course which +I have sketched out is not the particular one which you would have +chosen, or even see how to work. I quite agree. I am not claiming that +I could do it myself. But your objection is the precise reason why a +common external examination system is fatal to education. The process +of exhibiting the applications of knowledge must, for its success, +essentially depend on the character of the pupils and the genius of the +teacher. Of course I have left out the easiest applications with which +most of us are more at home. I mean the quantitative sides of sciences, +such as mechanics and physics. + +My meaning can be illustrated by looking more closely into a special +case of this type of application. In my rough catalogue of the sort +of subjects which should form the schedule for algebra, I mentioned +Elimination. It was not put there by accident, for it covers a very +important body of thought. + +In the first place, there is the abstract process of algebraic +elimination for suitable simple cases. The pupil acquires a firm grasp +of this by the process, inevitable in education, of working an adequate +number of examples. Again, there are the graphical solutions of the +same problem. Then we consider the significance in the external world. +We consider the velocity, time, space, acceleration diagrams. We take +uniform acceleration; we eliminate "_t_" between + +_v_ = _u_ + _ƒt_, and _s_ = _ut_ + ½_ƒt_^2, + +and eliminate "_s_" between + +_v_^2 = _u_^2 + 2_ƒs_, and _s_ = _ut_ + ½_ƒt_^2. + +Then we remember that constant acceleration is a very special case, +and we consider graphical solutions or empirically given variations of +_v_ or of _ƒ_. In preference, we use those empirical formulæ +which occur in the pupil's experimental work. We compare the strong and +weak points of the algebraic and graphical solutions. + +Again, in the same connection we plot the statistics of social +phenomena against the time. We then eliminate the time between suitable +pairs. We can speculate how far we have exhibited a real casual +connection, or how far a mere temporal coincidence. We notice that +we might have plotted against the time one set of statistics for one +country and another set for another country, and thus, with suitable +choice of subjects, have obtained graphs which certainly exhibited mere +coincidence. Also other graphs exhibit obvious casual connections. We +wonder how to discriminate. And so are drawn on as far as we will. + +But in considering this description, I must beg you to remember what I +have been insisting on above. In the first place, one train of thought +will not suit all groups of children. For example, I should expect that +artisan children will want something more concrete and, in a sense, +swifter than I have set down here. Perhaps I am wrong, but that is +what I should guess. In the second place, I am not contemplating one +beautiful lecture stimulating, once and for all, an admiring class. +That is not the way in which education proceeds. No; all the time the +pupils are hard at work solving examples, drawing graphs, and making +experiments, until they have a thorough hold on the whole subject. +I am describing the interspersed explanations, the directions which +should be given to their thoughts. The pupils have got to be made to +feel that they are studying something, and are not merely executing +intellectual minuets. + +In this connection the excellence of some of the most recent text-books +on elementary algebra emanating from members of this Association, +should create an epoch in the teaching of the subject. + +Finally, if you are teaching pupils for some general examination, +the problem of sound teaching is greatly complicated. Have you ever +noticed the zig-zag moulding round a Norman arch? The ancient work is +beautiful, the modern work is hideous. The reason is, that the modern +work is done to exact measure, the ancient work is varied according +to the idiosyncrasy of the workman. Here it is crowded, and there it +is expanded. Now the essence of getting pupils through examinations +is to give equal weight to all parts of the schedule. But mankind is +naturally specialist. One man sees a whole subject, where another can +find only a few detached examples. I know that it seems contradictory +to allow for specialism in a curriculum especially designed for a +broad culture. Without contradictions the world would be simpler, and +perhaps duller. But I am certain that in education wherever you exclude +specialism you destroy life. + +We now come to the other great branch of a general mathematical +education, namely Geometry. The same principles apply. The theoretical +part should be clear-cut, rigid, short, and important. Every +proposition not absolutely necessary to exhibit the main connection +of ideas should be cut out, but the great fundamental ideas should +be all there. No omission of concepts, such as those of Similarity +and Proportion. We must remember that, owing to the aid rendered by +the visual presence of a figure, Geometry is a field of unequalled +excellence for the exercise of the deductive faculties of reasoning. +Then, of course, there follows Geometrical Drawing, with its training +for the hand and eye. + +But, like Algebra, Geometry and Geometrical Drawing must be extended +beyond the mere circle of geometrical ideas. In an industrial +neighbourhood, machinery and workshop practice form the appropriate +extension. For example, in the London Polytechnics this has been +achieved with conspicuous success. For many secondary schools I suggest +that surveying and maps are the natural applications. In particular, +plane-table surveying should lead pupils to a vivid apprehension of the +immediate application of geometric truths. Simple drawing apparatus, a +surveyor's chain, and a surveyor's compass, should enable the pupils +to rise from the survey and mensuration of a field to the construction +of the map of a small district. The best education is to be found +in gaining the utmost information from the simplest apparatus. The +provision of elaborate instruments is greatly to be deprecated. To +have constructed the map of a small district, to have considered its +roads, its contours, its geology, its climate, its relation to other +districts, the effects on the status of its inhabitants, will teach +more history and geography than any knowledge of Perkin Warbeck or +of Behren's Straits. I mean not a nebulous lecture on the subject, +but a serious investigation in which the real facts are definitely +ascertained by the aid of accurate theoretical knowledge. A typical +mathematical problem should be: Survey such and such a field, draw a +plan of it to such and such a scale, and find the area. It would be +quite a good procedure to impart the necessary geometrical propositions +without their proofs. Then, concurrently in the same term, the proofs +of the propositions would be learnt while the survey was being made. + +Fortunately, the specialist side of education presents an easier +problem than does the provision of a general culture. For this there +are many reasons. One is that many of the principles of procedure +to be observed are the same in both cases, and it is unnecessary +to recapitulate. Another reason is that specialist training takes +place--or should take place--at a more advanced stage of the pupil's +course, and thus there is easier material to work upon. But undoubtedly +the chief reason is that the specialist study is normally a study +of peculiar interest to the student. He is studying it because, for +some reason, he wants to know it. This makes all the difference. +The general culture is designed to foster an activity of mind; the +specialist course utilises this activity. But it does not do to lay too +much stress on these neat antitheses. As we have already seen, in the +general course foci of special interest will arise; and similarly in +the special study, the external connections of the subject drag thought +outwards. + +Again, there is not one course of study which merely gives general +culture, and another which gives special knowledge. The subjects +pursued for the sake of a general education are special subjects +specially studied; and, on the other hand, one of the ways of +encouraging general mental activity is to foster a special devotion. +You may not divide the seamless coat of learning. What education has +to impart is an intimate sense for the power of ideas, for the beauty +of ideas, and for the structure of ideas, together with a particular +body of knowledge which has peculiar reference to the life of the being +possessing it. + +The appreciation of the structure of ideas is that side of a cultured +mind which can only grow under the influence of a special study. I +mean that eye for the whole chess-board, for the bearing of one set of +ideas on another. Nothing but a special study can give any appreciation +for the exact formulation of general ideas, for their relations when +formulated, for their service in the comprehension of life. A mind so +disciplined should be both more abstract and more concrete. It has been +trained in the comprehension of abstract thought and in the analysis of +facts. + +Finally, there should grow the most austere of all mental qualities; I +mean the sense for style. It is an æsthetic sense, based on admiration +for the direct attainment of a foreseen end, simply and without waste. +Style in art, style in literature, style in science, style in logic, +style in practical execution have fundamentally the same æsthetic +qualities, namely, attainment and restraint. The love of a subject in +itself and for itself, where it is not the sleepy pleasure of pacing a +mental quarter-deck, is the love of style as manifested in that study. + +Here we are brought back to the position from which we started, +the utility of education. Style, in its finest sense, is the last +acquirement of the educated mind; it is also the most useful. It +pervades the whole being. The administrator with a sense for style, +hates waste; the engineer with a sense for style, economises his +material; the artisan with a sense for style, prefers good work. Style +is the ultimate morality of mind. + +But above style, and above knowledge, there is something, a vague +shape like fate above the Greek gods. That something is Power. Style +is the fashioning of power, the restraining of power. But, after all, +the power of attainment of the desired end is fundamental. The first +thing is to get there. Do not bother about your style, but solve your +problem, justify the ways of God to man, administer your province, or +do whatever else is set before you. + +Where, then, does style help? In this, with style the end is attained +without side issues, without raising undesirable inflammations. With +style you attain your end and nothing but your end. With style the +effect of your activity is calculable, and foresight is the last gift +of gods to men. With style your power is increased, for your mind is +not distracted with irrelevancies, and you are more likely to attain +your object. Now style is the exclusive privilege of the expert. +Whoever heard of the style of an amateur painter, of the style of an +amateur poet? Style is always the product of specialist study, the +peculiar contribution of specialism to culture. + +English education in its present phase suffers from a lack of definite +aim, and from an external machinery which kills its vitality. Hitherto +in this address I have been considering the aims which should govern +education. In this respect England halts between two opinions. It has +not decided whether to produce amateurs or experts. The profound change +in the world which the nineteenth century has produced is that the +growth of knowledge has given foresight. The amateur is essentially a +man with appreciation and with immense versatility in mastering a given +routine. But he lacks the foresight which comes from special knowledge. +The object of this address is to suggest how to produce the expert +without loss of the essential virtues of the amateur. The machinery +of our secondary education is rigid where it should be yielding, +and lax where it should be rigid. Every school is bound on pain of +extinction to train its boys for a small set of definite examinations. +No headmaster has a free hand to develop his general education or his +specialist studies in accordance with the opportunities of his school, +which are created by its staff, its environment, its class of boys, and +its endowments. I suggest that no system of external tests which aims +primarily at examining individual scholars can result in anything but +educational waste. + +Primarily it is the schools and not the scholars which should be +inspected. Each school should grant its own leaving certificates, based +on its own curriculum. The standards of these schools should be sampled +and corrected. But the first requisite for educational reform is the +school as a unit, with its approved curriculum based on its own needs, +and evolved by its own staff. If we fail to secure that, we simply fall +from one formalism into another, from one dung-hill of inert ideas into +another. + +In stating that the school is the true educational unit in any national +system for the safe-guarding of efficiency, I have conceived the +alternative system as being the external examination of the individual +scholar. But every Scylla is faced by its Charybdis--or, in more homely +language, there is a ditch on both sides of the road. It will be +equally fatal to education if we fall into the hands of a supervising +department which is under the impression that it can divide all schools +into two or three rigid categories, each type being forced to adopt +a rigid curriculum. When I say that the school is the educational +unit, I mean exactly what I say, no larger unit, no smaller unit. +Each school must have the claim to be considered in relation to its +special circumstances. The classifying of schools for some purposes is +necessary. But no absolutely rigid curriculum, not modified by its own +staff, should be permissible. Exactly the same principles apply, with +the proper modifications, to universities and to technical colleges. + +When one considers in its length and in its breadth the importance +of this question of the education of a nation's young, the broken +lives, the defeated hopes, the national failures, which result from the +frivolous inertia with which it is treated, it is difficult to restrain +within oneself a savage rage. In the conditions of modern life the ride +is absolute, the race which does not value trained intelligence is +doomed. Not all your heroism, not all your social charm, not all your +wit, not all your victories on land or at sea, can move back the finger +of fate. To-day we maintain ourselves. To-morrow science will have +moved forward yet one more step, and there will be no appeal from the +judgment which will then be pronounced on the uneducated. + +We can be content with no less than the old summary of educational +ideal which has been current at any time from the dawn of our +civilisation. The essence of education is that it be religious. + +Pray, what is religious education? + +A religious education is an education which inculcates duty and +reverence. Duty arises from our potential control over the course +of events. Where attainable knowledge could have changed the issue, +ignorance has the guilt of vice. And the foundation of reverence is +this perception, that the present holds within itself the complete sum +of existence, backwards and forwards, that whole amplitude of time, +which is eternity. + + + + + CHAPTER II + + TECHNICAL EDUCATION AND ITS RELATION TO SCIENCE AND LITERATURE + + (_Presidential Address to the Mathematical Association, January, + 1917_) + + +THE subject of this address is Technical Education. I wish to examine +its essential nature and also its relation to a liberal education. Such +an inquiry may help us to realise the conditions for the successful +working of a national system of technical training. It is also a very +burning question among mathematical teachers; for mathematics is +included in most technological courses. + +Now it is unpractical to plunge into such a discussion without framing +in our own minds the best ideal towards which we desire to work, +however modestly we may frame our hopes as to the result which in the +near future is likely to be achieved. + +People are shy of ideals; and accordingly we find a formulation of the +ideal state of mankind placed by a modern dramatist[1] in the mouth of +a mad priest: "In my dreams it is a country where the State is the +Church and the Church the people: three in one and one in three. It is +a commonwealth in which work is play and play is life: three in one and +one in three. It is a temple in which the priest is the worshipper and +the worshipper the worshipped: three in one and one in three. It is a +godhead in which all life is human and all humanity divine: three in +one and one in three. It is, in short, the dream of a madman." + +Now the part of this speech to which I would direct attention is +embodied in the phrase, "It is a commonwealth in which work is play +and play is life." This is the ideal of technical education. It sounds +very mystical when we confront it with the actual facts, the toiling +millions, tired, discontented, mentally indifferent, and then the +employers---- I am not undertaking a social analysis, but I shall carry +you with me when I admit that the present facts of society are a long +way off this ideal. Furthermore, we are agreed that an employer who +conducted his workshop on the principle that "work should be play" +would be ruined in a week. + +The curse that has been laid on humanity, in fable and in fact, is, +that by the sweat of its brow shall it live. But reason and moral +intuition have seen in this curse the foundation for advance. The early +Benedictine monks rejoiced in their labours because they conceived +themselves as thereby made fellow-workers with Christ. + +Stripped of its theological trappings, the essential idea remains, +that work should be transfused with intellectual and moral vision and +thereby turned into a joy, triumphing over its weariness and its pain. +Each of us will re-state this abstract formulation in a more concrete +shape in accordance with his private outlook. State it how you like, +so long as you do not lose the main point in your details. However you +phrase it, it remains the sole real hope of toiling humanity; and it +is in the hands of technical teachers, and of those who control their +spheres of activity, so to mould the nation that daily it may pass to +its labours in the spirit of the monks of old. + +The immediate need of the nation is a large supply of skilled workmen, +of men with inventive genius, and of employers alert in the development +of new ideas. + +There is one--and only one--way to obtain these admirable results. +It is by producing workmen, men of science, and employers who enjoy +their work. View the matter practically in the light of our knowledge +of average human nature. Is it likely that a tired, bored workman, +however skilful his hands, will produce a large output of first-class +work? He will limit his production, will scamp his work, and be an +adept at evading inspection; he will be slow in adapting himself to +new methods; he will be a focus of discontent, full of unpractical +revolutionary ideas, controlled by no sympathetic apprehension of the +real working of trade conditions. If, in the troubled times which may +be before us, you wish appreciably to increase the chance of some +savage upheaval, introduce widespread technical education and ignore +the Benedictine ideal. Society will then get what it deserves. + +Again, inventive genius requires pleasurable mental activity as a +condition for its vigorous exercise. "Necessity is the mother of +invention" is a silly proverb. "Necessity is the mother of futile +dodges" is much nearer to the truth. The basis of the growth of modern +invention is science, and science is almost wholly the outgrowth of +pleasurable intellectual curiosity. + +The third class are the employers, who are to be enterprising. Now +it is to be observed that it is the successful employers who are the +important people to get at, the men with business connections all over +the world, men who are already rich. No doubt there will always be a +continuous process of rise and fall of businesses. But it is futile +to expect flourishing trade, if in the mass the successful houses of +business are suffering from atrophy. Now if these men conceive their +businesses as merely indifferent means for acquiring other disconnected +opportunities of life, they have no spur to alertness. They are +already doing very well, the mere momentum of their present business +engagements will carry them on for their time. They are not at all +likely to bother themselves with the doubtful chances of new methods. +Their real soul is in the other side of their life. Desire for money +will produce hard-fistedness and not enterprise. There is much more +hope for humanity from manufacturers who enjoy their work than from +those who continue in irksome business with the object of founding +hospitals. + +Finally, there can be no prospect of industrial peace so long as +masters and men in the mass conceive themselves as engaged in a +soulless operation of extracting money from the public. Enlarged views +of the work performed, and of the communal service thereby rendered, +can be the only basis on which to found sympathetic co-operation. + +The conclusion to be drawn from this discussion is, that alike for +masters and for men a technical or technological education, which is to +have any chance of satisfying the practical needs of the nation, must +be conceived in a liberal spirit as a real intellectual enlightenment +in regard to principles applied and services rendered. In such an +education geometry and poetry are as essential as turning lathes. + +The mythical figure of Plato may stand for modern liberal education +as does that of St. Benedict for technical education. We need not +entangle ourselves in the qualifications necessary for a balanced +representation of the actual thoughts of the actual men. They are used +here as symbolic figures typical of antithetical notions. We consider +Plato in the light of the type of culture he now inspires. + +In its essence a liberal education is an education for thought and +for æsthetic appreciation. It proceeds by imparting a knowledge of +the masterpieces of thought, of imaginative literature, and of art. +The action which it contemplates is command. It is an aristocratic +education implying leisure. This Platonic ideal has rendered +imperishable services to European civilisation. It has encouraged art, +it has fostered that spirit of disinterested curiosity which is the +origin of science, it has maintained the dignity of mind in the face of +material force, a dignity which claims freedom of thought. Plato did +not, like St. Benedict, bother himself to be a fellow-worker with his +slaves; but he must rank among the emancipators of mankind. His type +of culture is the peculiar inspiration of the liberal aristocrat, the +class from which Europe derives what ordered liberty it now possesses. +For centuries, from Pope Nicholas V to the schools of the Jesuits, and +from the Jesuits to the modern headmasters of English public schools, +this educational ideal has had the strenuous support of the clergy. + +For certain people it is a very good education. It suits their type +of mind and the circumstances amid which their life is passed. But +more has been claimed for it than this. All education has been judged +adequate or defective according to its approximation to this sole type. + +The essence of the type is a large discursive knowledge of the best +literature. The ideal product of the type is the man who is acquainted +with the best that has been written. He will have acquired the chief +languages, he will have considered the histories of the rise and fall +of nations, the poetic expression of human feeling, and have read the +great dramas and novels. He will also be well grounded in the chief +philosophies, and have attentively read those philosophic authors who +are distinguished for lucidity of style. + +It is obvious that, except at the close of a long life, he will not +have much time for anything else if any approximation is to be made to +the fulfilment of this programme. One is reminded of the calculation +in a dialogue of Lucian that, before a man could be justified in +practising any one of the current ethical systems, he should have spent +a hundred and fifty years in examining their credentials. + +Such ideals are not for human beings. What is meant by a liberal +culture is nothing so ambitious as a full acquaintance with the varied +literary expression of civilised mankind from Asia to Europe, and from +Europe to America. A small selection only is required; but then, as +we are told, it is a selection of the very best. I have my doubts of +a selection which includes Xenophon and omits Confucius, but then I +have read neither in the original. The ambitious programme of a liberal +education really shrinks to a study of some fragments of literature +included in a couple of important languages. + +But the expression of the human spirit is not confined to literature. +There are the other arts, and there are the sciences. Also education +must pass beyond the passive reception of the ideas of others. Powers +of initiative must be strengthened. Unfortunately initiative does not +mean just one acquirement--there is initiative in thought, initiative +in action, and the imaginative initiative of art; and these three +categories require many subdivisions. + +The field of acquirement is large, and the individual so fleeting and +so fragmentary: classical scholars, scientists, headmasters are alike +ignoramuses. + +There is a curious illusion that a more complete culture was possible +when there was less to know. Surely the only gain was, that it was more +possible to remain unconscious of ignorance. It cannot have been a gain +to Plato to have read neither Shakespeare, nor Newton, nor Darwin. +The achievements of a liberal education have in recent times not been +worsened. The change is that its pretensions have been found out. + +My point is, that no course of study can claim any position of ideal +completeness. Nor are the omitted factors of subordinate importance. +The insistence in the Platonic culture on disinterested intellectual +appreciation is a psychological error. Action and our implication in +the transition of events amid the evitable bond of cause to effect +are fundamental. An education which strives to divorce intellectual +or æsthetic life from these fundamental facts carries with it the +decadence of civilisation. Essentially culture should be for action, +and its effect should be to divest labour from the associations of +aimless toil. Art exists that we may know the deliverances of our +senses as good. It heightens the sense-world. + +Disinterested scientific curiosity is a passion for an ordered +intellectual vision of the connection of events. But the goal of +such curiosity is the marriage of action to thought. This essential +intervention of action even in abstract science is often overlooked. No +man of science wants merely to know. He acquires knowledge to appease +his passion for discovery. He does not discover in order to know, he +knows in order to discover. The pleasure which art and science can +give to toil is the enjoyment which arises from successfully directed +intention. Also it is the same pleasure which is yielded to the +scientist and to the artist. + +The antithesis between a technical and a liberal education is +fallacious. There can be no adequate technical education which is not +liberal, and no liberal education which is not technical: that is, no +education which does not impart both technique and intellectual vision. +In simpler language, education should turn out the pupil with something +he knows well and something he can do well. This intimate union of +practice and theory aids both. The intellect does not work best in a +vacuum. The stimulation of creative impulse requires, especially in +the case of a child, the quick transition to practice. Geometry and +mechanics, followed by workshop practice, gain that reality without +which mathematics is verbiage. + +There are three main methods which are required in a national system of +education, namely, the literary curriculum, the scientific curriculum, +the technical curriculum. But each of these curricula should include +the other two. What I mean is, that every form of education should give +the pupil a technique, a science, an assortment of general ideas, and +æsthetic appreciation, and that each of these sides of his training +should be illuminated by the others. Lack of time, even for the most +favoured pupil, makes it impossible to develop fully each curriculum. +Always there must be a dominant emphasis. The most direct æsthetic +training naturally falls in the technical curriculum in those cases +when the training is that requisite for some art or artistic craft. But +it is of high importance in both a literary and a scientific education. + +The educational method of the literary curriculum is the study of +language, that is, the study of our most habitual method of conveying +to others our states of mind. The technique which should be acquired +is the technique of verbal expression, the science is the study of the +structure of language and the analysis of the relations of language +to the states of mind conveyed. Furthermore, the subtle relations of +language to feeling, and the high development of the sense organs +to which written and spoken words appeal, lead to keen æsthetic +appreciations being aroused by the successful employment of language. +Finally, the wisdom of the world is preserved in the masterpieces of +linguistic composition. + +This curriculum has the merit of homogeneity. All its various parts +are co-ordinated and play into each other's hands. We can hardly be +surprised that such a curriculum, when once broadly established, should +have claimed the position of the sole perfect type of education. Its +defect is unduly to emphasise the importance of language. Indeed the +varied importance of verbal expression is so overwhelming that its +sober estimation is difficult. Recent generations have been witnessing +the retreat of literature, and of literary forms of expression, from +their position of unique importance in intellectual life. In order +truly to become a servant and a minister of nature something more is +required than literary aptitudes. + +A scientific education is primarily a training in the art of observing +natural phenomena, and in the knowledge and deduction of laws +concerning the sequence of such phenomena. But here, as in the case of +a liberal education, we are met by the limitations imposed by shortness +of time. There are many types of natural phenomena, and to each type +there corresponds a science with its peculiar modes of observation, +and its peculiar types of thought employed in the deduction of laws. A +study of science in general is impossible in education, all that can be +achieved is the study of two or three allied sciences. Hence the charge +of narrow specialism urged against any education which is primarily +scientific. It is obvious that the charge is apt to be well-founded; +and it is worth considering how, within the limits of a scientific +education and to the advantage of such an education, the danger can be +avoided. + +Such a discussion requires the consideration of technical education. A +technical education is in the main a training in the art of utilising +knowledge for the manufacture of material products. Such a training +emphasises manual skill, and the co-ordinated action of hand and +eye, and judgment in the control of the process of construction. But +judgment necessitates knowledge of those natural processes of which the +manufacture is the utilisation. Thus somewhere in technical training +an education in scientific knowledge is required. If you minimise +the scientific side, you will confine it to the scientific experts; +if you maximise it, you will impart it in some measure to the men, +and--what is of no less importance--to the directors and managers of +the businesses. + +Technical education is not necessarily allied exclusively to science +on its mental side. It may be an education for an artist or for +apprentices to an artistic craft. In that case æsthetic appreciation +will have to be cultivated in connection with it. + +An evil side of the Platonic culture has been its total neglect of +technical education as an ingredient in the complete development +of ideal human beings. This neglect has arisen from two disastrous +antitheses, namely, that between mind and body, and that between +thought and action. I will here interject, solely to avoid criticism, +that I am well aware that the Greeks highly valued physical beauty and +physical activity. They had, however, that perverted sense of values +which is the nemesis of slave-owning. + +I lay it down as an educational axiom that in teaching you will come +to grief as soon as you forget that your pupils have bodies. This is +exactly the mistake of the post-renaissance Platonic curriculum. But +nature can be kept at bay by no pitchfork; so in English education, +being expelled from the classroom, she returned with a cap and bells in +the form of all-conquering athleticism. + +The connections between intellectual activity and the body, though +diffused in every bodily feeling, are focussed in the eyes, the ears, +the voice, and the hands. There is a co-ordination of senses and +thought, and also a reciprocal influence between brain activity and +material creative activity. In this reaction the hands are peculiarly +important. It is a moot point whether the human hand created the human +brain, or the brain created the hand. Certainly the connection is +intimate and reciprocal. Such deep-seated relations are not widely +atrophied by a few hundred years of disuse in exceptional families. + +The disuse of hand-craft is a contributory cause to the brain-lethargy +of aristocracies, which is only mitigated by sport where the concurrent +brain-activity is reduced to a minimum and the hand-craft lacks +subtlety. The necessity for constant writing and vocal exposition is +some slight stimulus to the thought-power of the professional classes. +Great readers, who exclude other activities, are not distinguished by +subtlety of brain. They tend to be timid conventional thinkers. No +doubt this is partly due to their excessive knowledge outrunning their +powers of thought; but it is partly due to the lack of brain-stimulus +from the productive activities of hand or voice. + +In estimating the importance of technical education we must rise above +the exclusive association of learning with book-learning. First-hand +knowledge is the ultimate basis of intellectual life. To a large +extent book-learning conveys second-hand information, and as such can +never rise to the importance of immediate practice. Our goal is to see +the immediate event of our lives as instances of our general ideas. +What the learned world tends to offer is one second-hand scrap of +information illustrating ideas derived from another second-hand scrap +of information. The second-handedness of the learned world is the +secret of its mediocrity. It is tame because it has never been scared +by facts. The main importance of Francis Bacon's influence does not +lie in any peculiar theory of inductive reasoning which he happened to +express, but in the revolt against second-hand information of which he +was a leader. + +The peculiar merit of a scientific education should be, that it bases +thought upon first-hand observation; and the corresponding merit of a +technical education is, that it follows our deep natural instinct to +translate thought into manual skill, and manual activity into thought. + +We are a Mathematical Association, and it is natural to ask: Where do +we come in? We come in just at this point. + +The thought which science evokes is logical thought. Now logic is of +two kinds: the logic of discovery and the logic of the discovered. + +The logic of discovery consists in the weighing of probabilities, in +discarding details deemed to be irrelevant, in divining the general +rules according to which events occur, and in testing hypotheses by +devising suitable experiments. This is inductive logic. + +The logic of the discovered is the deduction of the special events +which, under certain circumstances, would happen in obedience to the +assumed laws of nature. Thus when the laws are discovered or assumed, +their utilisation entirely depends on deductive logic. Without +deductive logic science would be entirely useless. It is merely a +barren game to ascend from the particular to the general, unless +afterwards we can reverse the process and descend from the general to +the particular, ascending and descending like the angels on Jacob's +ladder. When Newton had divined the law of gravitation he at once +proceeded to calculate the earth's attractions on an apple at its +surface and on the moon. We may note in passing that inductive logic +would be impossible without deductive logic. Thus Newton's calculations +were an essential step in his inductive verification of the great law. + +Now mathematics is nothing else than the more complicated parts of +the art of deductive reasoning, especially where it concerns number, +quantity, and space. + +In the teaching of science, the art of thought should be taught: +namely, the art of forming clear conceptions applying to first-hand +experience, the art of divining the general truths which apply, the +art of testing divinations, and the art of utilising general truths +by reasoning to more particular cases of some peculiar importance. +Furthermore, a power of scientific exposition is necessary, so that the +relevant issues from a confused mass of ideas can be stated clearly, +with due emphasis on important points. + +By the time a science, or a small group of sciences, has been taught +thus amply, with due regard to the general art of thought, we have gone +a long way towards correcting the specialism of science. The worst +of a scientific education based, as necessarily must be the case, on +one or two particular branches of science, is that the teachers under +the influence of the examination system are apt merely to stuff +their pupils with the narrow results of these special sciences. It is +essential that the generality of the method be continually brought to +light and contrasted with the speciality of the particular application. +A man who only knows his own science, as a routine peculiar to that +science, does not even know that. He has no fertility of thought, no +power of quickly seizing the bearing of alien ideas. He will discover +nothing, and be stupid in practical applications. + +This exhibition of the general in the particular is extremely difficult +to effect, especially in the case of younger pupils. The art of +education is never easy. To surmount its difficulties, especially those +of elementary education, is a task worthy of the highest genius. It is +the training of human souls. + +Mathematics, well taught, should be the most powerful instrument +in gradually implanting this generality of idea. The essence of +mathematics is perpetually to be discarding more special ideas in +favour of more general ideas, and special methods in favour of general +methods. We express the conditions of a special problem in the form of +an equation, but that equation will serve for a hundred other problems, +scattered through diverse sciences. The general reasoning is always +the powerful reasoning, because deductive cogency is the property of +abstract form. + +Here, again, we must be careful. We shall ruin mathematical education +if we use it merely to impress general truths. The general ideas are +the means of connecting particular results. After all, it is the +concrete special cases which are important. Thus in the handling of +mathematics in your results you cannot be too concrete, and in your +methods you cannot be too general. The essential course of reasoning +is to generalise what is particular, and then to particularise what is +general. Without generality there is no reasoning, without concreteness +there is no importance. + +Concreteness is the strength of technical education. I would +remind you that truths which lack the highest generality are not +necessarily concrete facts. For example, _x_ + _y_ = _y_ + _x_ is an +algebraic truth more general than 2 + 2 = 4. But "two and two make +four" is itself a highly general proposition lacking any element of +concreteness. To obtain a concrete proposition immediate intuition of a +truth concerning particular objects is requisite; for example, "these +two apples and those apples together make four apples" is a concrete +proposition, if you have direct perception or immediate memory of the +apples. + +In order to obtain the full realisation of truths as applying, and not +as empty formulæ, there is no alternative to technical education. Mere +passive observation is not sufficient. In creation only is there vivid +insight into the properties of the object thereby produced. If you +want to understand anything, make it yourself, is a sound rule. Your +faculties will be alive, your thoughts gain vividness by an immediate +translation into acts. Your ideas gain that reality which comes from +seeing the limits of their application. + +In elementary education this doctrine has long been put into practice. +Young children are taught to familiarise themselves with shapes and +colours by simple manual operations of cutting out and of sorting. But +good though this is, it is not quite what I mean. That is practical +experience before you think, experience antecedent to thought in order +to create ideas, a very excellent discipline. But technical education +should be much more than that: it is creative experience while you +think, experience which realises your thought, experience which teaches +you to co-ordinate act and thought, experience leading you to associate +thought with foresight and foresight with achievement. Technical +education gives theory, and a shrewd insight as to where theory fails. + +A technical education is not to be conceived as a maimed alternative +to the perfect Platonic culture: namely, as a defective training +unfortunately made necessary by cramped conditions of life. No +human being can attain to anything but fragmentary knowledge and a +fragmentary training of his capacities. There are, however, three main +roads along which we can proceed with good hope of advancing towards +the best balance of intellect and character: these are the way of +literary culture, the way of scientific culture, the way of technical +culture. No one of these methods can be exclusively followed without +grave loss of intellectual activity and of character. But a mere +mechanical mixture of the three curricula will produce bad results in +the shape of scraps of information never interconnected or utilised. +We have already noted as one of the strong points of the traditional +literary culture that all its parts are co-ordinated. The problem +of education is to retain the dominant emphasis, whether literary, +scientific, or technical, and without loss of co-ordination to infuse +into each way of education something of the other two. + +To make definite the problem of technical education fix attention on +two ages: one thirteen, when elementary education ends; and the other +seventeen, when technical education ends so far as it is compressed +within a school curriculum. I am aware that for artisans in junior +technical schools a three-years' course would be more usual. On the +other hand, for naval officers, and for directing classes generally, +a longer time can be afforded. We want to consider the principles +to govern a curriculum which shall land these children at the age of +seventeen in the position of having technical skill useful to the +community. + +Their technical manual training should start at thirteen, bearing a +modest proportion to the rest of their work, and should increase in +each year finally to attain to a substantial proportion. Above all +things it should not be too specialised. Workshop finish and workshop +dodges, adapted to one particular job, should be taught in the +commercial workshop, and should form no essential part of the school +course. A properly trained worker would pick them up in no time. In all +education the main cause of failure is staleness. Technical education +is doomed if we conceive it as a system for catching children young and +for giving them one highly specialised manual aptitude. The nation has +need of a fluidity of labour, not merely from place to place, but also +within reasonable limits of allied aptitudes, from one special type of +work to another special type. I know that here I am on delicate ground, +and I am not claiming that men while they are specialising on one sort +of work should spasmodically be set to other kinds. That is a question +of trade organisation with which educationalists have no concern. I am +only asserting the principles that training should be broader than the +ultimate specialisation, and that the resulting power of adaptation to +varying demands is advantageous to the workers, to the employers, and +to the nation. + +In considering the intellectual side of the curriculum we must be +guided by the principle of the co-ordination of studies. In general, +the intellectual studies most immediately related to manual training +will be some branches of science. More than one branch will, in fact, +be concerned; and even if that be not the case, it is impossible to +narrow down scientific study to a single thin line of thought. It is +possible, however, provided that we do not press the classification +too far, roughly to classify technical pursuits according to the +dominant science involved. We thus find a sixfold division, namely, +(1) Geometrical techniques, (2) Mechanical techniques, (3) Physical +techniques, (4) Chemical techniques, (5) Biological techniques, (6) +Techniques of commerce and of social service. + +By this division, it is meant that apart from auxiliary sciences +some particular science requires emphasis in the training for most +occupations. We can, for example, reckon carpentry, ironmongery, +and many artistic crafts among geometrical techniques. Similarly +agriculture is a biological technique. Probably cookery, if it includes +food catering, would fall midway between biological, physical, and +chemical sciences, though of this I am not sure. + +The sciences associated with commerce and social service would be +partly algebra, including arithmetic and statistics, and partly +geography and history. But this section is somewhat heterogeneous in +its scientific affinities. Anyhow the exact way in which technical +pursuits are classified in relation to science is a detail. The +essential point is, that with some thought it is possible to find +scientific courses which illuminate most occupations. Furthermore, the +problem is well understood, and has been brilliantly solved in many of +the schools of technology and junior technical schools throughout the +country. + +In passing from science to literature, in our review of the +intellectual elements of technical education, we note that many studies +hover between the two: for example, history and geography. They are +both of them very essential in education, provided that they are the +right history and the right geography. Also books giving descriptive +accounts of general results, and trains of thought in various sciences +fall in the same category. Such books should be partly historical +and partly expository of the main ideas which have finally arisen. +Prof. R. A. Gregory's recent book, _Discovery_, and the _Home +University Library_ series illustrate my meaning. Their value in +education depends on their quality as mental stimulants. They must not +be inflated with gas on the wonders of science, and must be informed +with a broad outlook. + +It is unfortunate that the literary element in education has rarely +been considered apart from grammatical study. The historical reason is, +that when the modern Platonic curriculum was being formed Latin and +Greek were the sole keys which rendered great literature accessible. +But there is no necessary connection between literature and grammar. +The great age of Greek literature was already past before the arrival +of the grammarians of Alexandria. Of all types of men to-day existing, +classical scholars are the most remote from the Greeks of the Periclean +times. + +Mere literary knowledge is of slight importance. The only thing that +matters is, how it is known. The facts related are nothing. Literature +only exists to express and develop that imaginative world which is our +life, the kingdom which is within us. It follows that the literary side +of a technical education should consist in an effort to make the pupils +enjoy literature. It does not matter what they know, but the enjoyment +is vital. The great English Universities, under whose direct authority +school-children are examined in plays of Shakespeare, to the certain +destruction of their enjoyment, should be prosecuted for soul-murder. + +Now there are two kinds of intellectual enjoyment: the enjoyment of +creation, and the enjoyment of relaxation. They are not necessarily +separated. A change of occupation may give the full tide of happiness +which comes from the concurrence of both forms of pleasure. The +appreciation of literature is really creation. The written word, its +music, and its associations, are only the stimuli. The vision which +they evoke is our own doing. No one, no genius other than our own, +can make our own life live. But except for those engaged in literary +occupations, literature is also a relaxation. It gives exercise to that +other side which any occupation must suppress during the working hours. +Art also has the same function in life as has literature. + +To obtain the pleasure of relaxation requires no help. The pleasure +is merely to cease doing. Some such pure relaxation is a necessary +condition of health. Its dangers are notorious, and to the greater +part of the necessary relaxation nature has affixed, not enjoyment, +but the oblivion of sleep. Creative enjoyment is the outcome of +successful effort and requires help for its initiation. Such enjoyment +is necessary for high-speed work and for original achievement. + +To speed up production with unrefreshed workmen is a disastrous +economic policy. Temporary success will be at the expense of the +nation, which, for long years of their lives, will have to support +worn-out artisans--unemployables. Equally disastrous is the +alternation of spasms of effort with periods of pure relaxation. +Such periods are the seed-times of degeneration, unless rigorously +curtailed. The normal recreation should be change of activity, +satisfying the cravings of instincts. Games afford such activity. Their +disconnection emphasises the relaxation, but their excess leaves us +empty. + +It is here that literature and art should play an essential part in +a healthily organised nation. Their services to economic production +would be only second to those of sleep or of food. I am not now talking +of the training of an artist, but of the use of art as a condition of +healthy life. It is analogous to sunshine in the physical world. + +When we have once rid our minds of the idea that knowledge is to +be exacted, there is no especial difficulty or expense involved in +helping the growth of artistic enjoyment. All school-children could +be sent at regular intervals to neighbouring theatres where suitable +plays could be subsidised. Similarly for concerts and cinema films. +Pictures are more doubtful in their popular attraction; but interesting +representations of scenes or ideas which the children have read about +would probably appeal. The pupils themselves should be encouraged +in artistic efforts. Above all the art of reading aloud should be +cultivated. The Roger de Coverley essays of Addison are perfect +examples of readable prose. + +Art and literature have not merely an indirect effect on the main +energies of life. Directly, they give vision. The world spreads wide +beyond the deliverances of material sense, with subtleties of reaction +and with pulses of emotion. Vision is the necessary antecedent to +control and to direction. In the contest of races which in its final +issues will be decided in the workshops and not on the battle-field, +the victory will belong to those who are masters of stores of trained +nervous energy, working under conditions favourable to growth. One such +essential condition is Art. + +If there had been time, there are other things which I should like +to have said: for example, to advocate the inclusion of one foreign +language in all education. From direct observation I know this to be +possible for artisan children. But enough has been put before you, +to make plain the principles with which we should undertake national +education. + +In conclusion, I recur to the thought of the Benedictines, who +saved for mankind the vanishing civilisation of the ancient world +by linking together knowledge, labour, and moral energy. Our danger +is to conceive practical affairs as the kingdom of evil, in which +success is only possible by the extrusion of ideal aims. I believe +that such a conception is a fallacy directly negatived by practical +experience. In education this error takes the form of a mean view of +technical training. Our forefathers in the dark ages saved themselves +by embodying high ideals in great organisations. It is our task, +without servile imitation, boldly to exercise our creative energies, +remembering amid discouragements that the coldest hour immediately +precedes the dawn. + + +FOOTNOTES: + +[Footnote 1: _Cf._ BERNARD SHAW: _John Bull's Other +Island_.] + + + + + CHAPTER III + + A POLYTECHNIC IN WAR-TIME + + _Address at the Prize Distribution, Borough Polytechnic Institute, + Southwark, 16th February, 1917_ + + +I WILL commence by drawing your attention to some of the satisfactory +features of the Principal's report on the work of the Institute during +the past year. It has been a year of great difficulties. Some of our +staff are serving with the colours, and our classes have been depleted. +But in spite of everything, we have done very well. First, the average +result in the examinations has been good, surprisingly good in view of +the present circumstances. The Governors attach great importance to +the maintenance of a high average result; it is the best single test +of efficiency. Again, our individual successes have been notable. We +have gained--I say _we_ because we are all one in our pleasure at +these successes--we have gained two £80 L.C.C. scholarships, nineteen +exhibitions, in addition to a first-place, and medals, prizes and +certificates. All this is very satisfactory. It tells of efficient +teaching, and of hard work and regular attendance on the part of the +students. We know that we are keeping up the standard of efficiency +which in the past has been a source of pride to every one connected +with this Institute. + +Now all this good work does not come about by itself without any one +making an effort. Such a record requires our skilled staff of teachers +and organisers. They have worked very hard during the last session +under great difficulties, in order to create the successful result +which we are here to celebrate. I know something about teaching. It +is very exacting work, and can be made successful only by continual +devotion. I am sure that I am voicing your feelings, and I know that +I am expressing those of the Governors, when I thank the ladies and +gentlemen of the staff very heartily for their services during the last +session. + +Prize-givings are always pleasant occasions. We have come here to think +about our successes, and to congratulate our students. There is no more +satisfactory Governors' Meeting in the course of the year than when we +meet on this occasion, and face our friends and tell them how pleased +we are at the successful result of their hard work. This evening I am +in a doubly happy position, for my colleagues have asked me to be their +spokesman in tendering our good wishes to the prize-winners. You have +worked hard and you have done well, and I am sure that you all deserve +your successes; they are a pleasure not only to you, but in your homes +and to your companions and fellow-students. + +Successful work here will enable you to acquire skill in your trades, +and thereby the better to earn your living. Earning a living is on the +average no bad test of service rendered to the community. A man who +has made himself skilful in his trade and has done well for himself in +his walk of life, has in general good reason to believe that he is a +citizen who has benefited his country. It is an evil day for a nation +when it loses respect for success in industry. + +But if you steer your lives by the compass which points steadily to +the North Pole of personal success, you will have missed your greatest +chances in life. The genial climate is in the south. + +What I mean is this: you must make up your mind to find the best part +of your happiness in kindly helpful relations with others. It should be +our ambition to leave our own small corner of the world a little tidier +and a little happier than when we entered it. I am well aware that +this is an old story; but old stories are sometimes true, and this is +the biggest truth in the whole world. The warm kindly feelings are the +happy feelings. The fortunate people are those whose minds are filled +with thoughts in which they forget themselves and remember others. It +is not true that nature is a mere scene of struggle in which every one +competes with his neighbour. Those communities thrive best and last +longest which are filled with a spirit of mutual help. + +The future of the country lies with you. The crown of your success +is the promise of future work, often unrecognised work, done under +discouragement, but done steadily and cheerfully. It is on you that +the country depends for the maintenance and the growth of those ideals +without which a race withers. Do not be discouraged by difficulties +which seem unsurmountable. The conditions of life which mould us all +are modified by our will, by our energy, and by the purity of our +intentions. + +If we may judge of intensity of feeling by length of memory, the +enjoyment of receiving a prize bites very deep. Across the space of +more than forty years, before many of your parents were born, or when +they were being carried about in long clothes, I can remember, as if it +were yesterday, the occasion when I received my first prize at school. +I can see the mediæval school-room, the headmaster, and my companions. +Perhaps some of you, when a generation has passed by, will remember the +scene to-night--this Stanley Gymnasium recalling the memory of Miss +Maude Stanley, who devoted to our welfare so much of her energy and +her thought--the adjoining Edric Hall associated with the name of Mr. +Edric Bayley, the Father of the Institute; Mr. Millis and Miss Smith, +the first Principal and the first Lady Superintendent, the architects +of our prosperity; Mr. Leonard Spicer, our Chairman and member of a +family and of a firm known throughout the world, and respected in +proportion as they are known. And the cause why to-night we are a small +gathering is one more reason why this assembly can never slip from your +memory. We meet at a moment when England stands in as deadly a peril as +in any previous moment of her history--such peril as when the Spanish +ships of the Armada rode in the English Channel, or when Napoleon +watched our coast across the Strait of Dover. The present danger can be +overcome only by the same courage as that which saved our freedom in +those former times. + +Therefore, to-night, in recalling the activities of the various +sections of our society which form this great Polytechnic Institute, +our thoughts go further afield. They travel by land and by sea, till +they bring before our minds the gallant band whom this Institute has +sent to the Front--more than 800 of our members are with the Colours. +What our fighting men have done for us, for the world in general, and +for the future of England, is so overwhelming that words cannot praise +them enough. I will just say one thing to you: When you read of great +deeds done in past times, of perils encountered, of adventures, of +undaunted courage, of patriotism, of self-sacrifice, of suffering +endured for noble cause, you each can say--I, too, have known such +heroes; they are among my countrymen, they are among my fellow-workers, +they are among my fellow-students and companions, they are among the +dear inmates of my home. And for those who have fallen, it is for us +to erect a monument sufficient to transmit to future ages the memory +of their sacrifice. For this purpose there is only one memorial which +can suffice, namely, the cause for which they died. The greatness of +England, the future of England, has been left by them to our keeping. +Guard it well. + +The greatness of a country is nothing else than the greatness of the +lives of the men and of the women who compose it. Do not look round and +think who ought to be great Englishmen--be great yourselves--you are +the people to achieve it, you who are sitting here to-night. There can +be no substitute service for this purpose. It is the collective energy +of the whole people that will be needed to fashion a new England worthy +of the sufferings which for its sake have been endured. + +A few days ago I asked a man who has worked in Egypt for many years +under Lord Kitchener, what he would pick out as the best sign of Lord +Kitchener's greatness. He answered, whatever Kitchener set himself to +do, thereby became important. Now that is the secret of it all--take +hold of your opportunities and make them important. + +Here we are in this Borough Polytechnic. What an opportunity it +represents. This Institute is a centre for social meeting, a centre +for recreation, a centre for education, a centre for discussion. We +will not sacrifice any one of our sides. They must all be part of the +greatness which we claim. Make them all first-rate. + +Consider first the social and recreative sides. For heaven's sake don't +think that you must be dull in order to be great. There is no finer +test of a nation than the way in which it fashions its amusements. +Three centuries ago after the Armada we made a good start in Southwark. +Shakespeare had his theatre here and wrote his plays to be acted in +this borough. He has walked these streets, and if you had met him in +Westminster he would, quite likely, have told you that he was going +down to the "Elephant." And even now the performances given at the +"Old Vic" are among the best in London for the purpose of seeing his +plays properly acted. What Southwark has done for the drama, she can +do for the other arts, by using this Institute as the instrument for +her energies. Why should we not be a centre for artistic enterprise--I +mean for our own art and our own enterprise, thought of by ourselves +and enjoyed by ourselves and carried through by ourselves? We shall not +always enjoy each others' creations, but the great point is to make our +own efforts. Of course all efforts require preparation and stimulus and +knowledge of what others are doing. + +At the present time--interrupted for the moment by the war--a great +revolution in the art of painting is in progress throughout the world. +Its centres are Paris and Italy and London and Munich, and its origin +in the far east, in China and Japan. There are two sides as in every +revolution, the Conservatives and the Revolutionists. Our own frescoes +in a neighbouring room represent an early stage of the movement in +London. Why should we not know all about it--obtain loans of pictures +which illustrate its phases and its cross currents, and compare these +with examples of the old style? + +But pictures are only one phase of art, and not the sort of art which +we ourselves can produce most easily. There are music, dancing, +recitation, literature, carving and modelling, and the various +decorative arts, such as embroidery, bookbinding, dress-making and +upholstery. This list, incomplete as it is, tells us two great +truths--you cannot separate art and recreation, and you cannot +separate art and business. The list includes items which we consider +as amusements, and items which we think of as business. We began with +dancing and ended with upholstery. Make them all beautiful. + +Beautiful things have dignity. Enjoy the rhythm of your dancing and +admire the beauty of your embroidery or your bookbinding. In whatever +you do, have an ideal of excellence. Any separation between art and +work is not only an error, but it is very bad business. Our brave +allies, the French, have made Paris the art centre of the world. They +have built up and maintain their large and lucrative trade in the +decorative products of France, mainly by reason of three qualities +which they possess. In the first place, they enjoy art themselves, and +reverence it. In the second place, they have a tremendous power of hard +work. And in the third place, every Frenchman, and still more every +Frenchwoman, have within them an immense fund of common sense. The +threefold secret is, Love of Art, Industry, and Common Sense. + +To make available our industry and common sense in the trades where +they are wanted, rigorous training in schools of design and technique +are necessary. We have such departments here. But all such training of +you will be a failure unless you yourselves enjoy art and beauty as +a natural recreation. A technical school of training is like a deep, +narrow well, sunk with careful labour to tap the underground river of +water which flows below the surface of our natures. But your well will +be dry unless the bright warm sun has first drawn up the vapour from +the wide ocean, and the free untrammelled breezes have carried the +clouds hither and thither, until at length they break, as it were by +chance over the distant hills and soak the land with their downpour. + +What I have said about art is a parable which applies to other +occupations and other studies. It is more than a parable; it is the +literal truth. The love of art is the love of excellence, it is the +enjoyment of the triumph of design over the shapeless products of +chance forces. An engineer, who is worth his salt, loves the beauty of +his machines, shown in their adjustment of parts and in their swift, +smooth motions. He loves also the sense of foresight and of insight +which knowledge can give him. People say that machinery and commerce +are driving beauty out of the modern world. I do not believe it. A new +beauty is being added, a more intellectual beauty, appealing to the +understanding as much as to the eye. + +The wonder of London ever takes the mind with fresh astonishment. The +city possesses parks, and palaces, and cathedrals. But no other parts +of it surpass in wonder its houses of business and its workshops and +its factories. + +In the next few years the future of the world will be decided for +centuries to come. The battles of this war are only the first part of +the contest between races, and between the ways of life for which +those races stand. We believe that England, with its various peoples +and communities scattered in islands and continents beyond the seas, +stands for ways of life infinitely precious, the way of humanity, the +way of liberty, the way of self-government, the way of good order based +on toleration and kindly feeling, the way of peaceful industry. The +final decision in this struggle will be found in the workshops of the +world. It lies in your hands. Statesmen and emperors will only register +the results which you have achieved. Your weapons will be skill, and +energy, and knowledge. You will require a sane understanding of your +own rights, and a sane understanding of the rights and the difficulties +of other classes. The greatness of England will be your greatness, and +its success your success. + +The arsenal for war is at Woolwich. This Polytechnic Institute is an +arsenal for peace, where you can find the weapons for the conquest of +your lives. + + + + + CHAPTER IV + + THE MATHEMATICAL CURRICULUM + + (_Presidential Address to the London Branch of the Mathematical + Association, 1912_) + + +THE situation in regard to education at the present time cannot find +its parallel without going back for some centuries to the break-up of +the mediæval traditions of learning. Then, as now, the traditional +intellectual outlook, despite the authority which it had justly +acquired from its notable triumphs, had grown to be too narrow for the +interests of mankind. The result of this shifting of human interest +was a demand for a parallel shifting of the basis of education, so +as to fit the pupils for the ideas which later in life would in fact +occupy their minds. Any serious fundamental change in the intellectual +outlook of human society must necessarily be followed by an educational +revolution. It may be delayed for a generation by vested interests or +by the passionate attachment of some leaders of thought to the cycle +of ideas within which they received their own mental stimulus at an +impressionable age. But the law is inexorable that education to be +living and effective must be directed to informing pupils with those +ideas, and to creating for them those capacities which will enable them +to appreciate the current thought of their epoch. + +There is no such thing as a successful system of education in a vacuum, +that is to say, a system which is divorced from immediate contact with +the existing intellectual atmosphere. Education which is not modern +shares the fate of all organic things which are kept too long. + +But the blessed word "modern" does not really solve our difficulties. +What we mean is, relevant to modern thought, either in the ideas +imparted or in the aptitudes produced. Something found out only +yesterday may not really be modern in this sense. It may belong to +some bygone system of thought prevalent in a previous age, or, what +is very much more likely, it may be too recondite. When we demand +that education should be relevant to modern thought, we are referring +to thoughts broadly spread throughout cultivated society. It is this +question of the unfitness of recondite subjects for use in general +education which I wish to make the keynote of my address this afternoon. + +It is in fact rather a delicate subject for us mathematicians. +Outsiders are apt to accuse our subject of being recondite. Let us +grasp the nettle at once and frankly admit that in general opinion it +is the very typical example of reconditeness. By this word I do not +mean difficulty, but that the ideas involved are of highly special +application, and rarely influence thought. + +This liability to reconditeness is the characteristic evil which is +apt to destroy the utility of mathematics in liberal education. So +far as it clings to the educational use of the subject, so far we +must acquiesce in a miserably low level of mathematical attainment +among cultivated people in general. I yield to no one in my anxiety to +increase the educational scope of mathematics. The way to achieve this +end is not by a mere blind demand for more mathematics. We must face +the real difficulty which obstructs its extended use. + +Is the subject recondite? Now, viewed as a whole, I think it is. +_Securus judicat orbis terrarum_--the general judgment of mankind +is sure. + +The subject as it exists in the minds and in the books of students of +mathematics _is_ recondite. It proceeds by deducing innumerable +special results from general ideas, each result more recondite than the +preceding. It is not my task this afternoon to defend mathematics as a +subject for profound study. It can very well take care of itself. What +I want to emphasise is, that the very reasons which make this science +a delight to its students are reasons which obstruct its use as an +educational instrument--namely, the boundless wealth of deductions from +the interplay of general theorems, their complication, their apparent +remoteness from the ideas from which the argument started, the variety +of methods, and their purely abstract character which brings, as its +gift, eternal truth. + +Of course, all these characteristics are of priceless value to +students; for ages they have fascinated some of the keenest intellects. +My only remark is that, except for a highly selected class, they are +fatal in education. The pupils are bewildered by a multiplicity of +detail, without apparent relevance either to great ideas or to ordinary +thoughts. The extension of this sort of training in the direction +of acquiring more detail is the last measure to be desired in the +interests of education. + +The conclusion at which we arrive is, that mathematics, if it is +to be used in general education, must be subjected to a rigorous +process of selection and adaptation. I do not mean, what is of course +obvious, that however much time we devote to the subject the average +pupil will not get very far. But that, however limited the progress, +certain characteristics of the subject, natural at any stage, must be +rigorously excluded. The science as presented to young pupils must +lose its aspect of reconditeness. It must, on the face of it, deal +directly and simply with a few general ideas of far-reaching importance. + +Now, in this matter of the reform of mathematical instruction, the +present generation of teachers may take a very legitimate pride in +its achievements. It has shown immense energy in reform, and has +accomplished more than would have been thought possible in so short a +time. It is not always recognised how difficult is the task of changing +a well-established curriculum entrenched behind public examinations. + +But for all that, great progress has been made, and, to put the matter +at its lowest, the old dead tradition has been broken up. I want to +indicate this afternoon the guiding idea which should direct our +efforts at reconstruction. I have already summed it up in a phrase, +namely, we must aim at the elimination of reconditeness from the +educational use of the subject. + +Our courses of instruction should be planned to illustrate simply a +succession of ideas of obvious importance. All pretty divagations +should be rigorously excluded. The goal to be aimed at is that the +pupil should acquire familiarity with abstract thought, should realise +how it applies to particular concrete circumstances, and should know +how to apply general methods to its logical investigation. With this +educational ideal nothing can be worse than the aimless accretion +of theorems in our text-books, which acquire their position merely +because the children can be made to learn them and examiners can set +neat questions on them. The bookwork to be learnt should all be very +important as illustrating ideas. The examples set--and let there +be as many examples as teachers find necessary--should be direct +illustrations of the theorems, either by way of abstract particular +cases or by way of application to concrete phenomena. Here it is worth +remarking that it is quite useless to simplify the bookwork, if the +examples set in examinations in fact require an extended knowledge of +recondite details. There is a mistaken idea that problems test ability +and genius, and that bookwork tests cram. This is not my experience. +Only boys who have been specially crammed for scholarships can ever +do a problem paper successfully. Bookwork properly set, not in mere +snippets according to the usual bad plan, is a far better test of +ability, provided that it is supplemented by direct examples. But this +is a digression on the bad influence of examinations on teaching. + +The main ideas which lie at the base of mathematics are not at all +recondite. They are abstract. But one of the main objects of the +inclusion of mathematics in a liberal education is to train the pupils +to handle abstract ideas. The science constitutes the first large +group of abstract ideas which naturally occur to the mind in any +precise form. For the purposes of education, mathematics consists of +the relations of number, the relations of quantity, and the relations +of space. This is not a general definition of mathematics, which, in +my opinion, is a much more general science. But we are now discussing +the use of mathematics in education. These three groups of relations, +concerning number, quantity, and space, are interconnected. + +Now, in education we proceed from the particular to the general. +Accordingly, children should be taught the use of these ideas by +practice among simple examples. My point is this: The goal should be, +not an aimless accumulation of special mathematical theorems, but the +final recognition that the preceding years of work have illustrated +those relations of number, and of quantity, and of space, which are of +fundamental importance. Such a training should lie at the base of all +philosophical thought. In fact elementary mathematics rightly conceived +would give just that philosophical discipline of which the ordinary +mind is capable. But what at all costs we ought to avoid, is the +pointless accumulation of details. As many examples as you like; let +the children work at them for terms, or for years. But these examples +should be direct illustrations of the main ideas. In this way, and +this only, can the fatal reconditeness be avoided. + +I am not now speaking in particular of those who are to be professional +mathematicians, or of those who for professional reasons require a +knowledge of certain mathematical details. We are considering the +liberal education of all students, including these two classes. This +general use of mathematics should be the simple study of a few general +truths, well illustrated by practical examples. This study should +be conceived by itself, and completely separated in idea from the +professional study mentioned above, for which it would make a most +excellent preparation. Its final stage should be the recognition of +the general truths which the work done has illustrated. As far as I +can make out, at present the final stage is the proof of some property +of circles connected with triangles. Such properties are immensely +interesting to mathematicians. But are they not rather recondite, +and what is the precise relation of such theorems to the ideal of +a liberal education? The end of all the grammatical studies of the +student in classics is to read Virgil and Horace--the greatest thoughts +of the greatest men. Are we content, when pleading for the adequate +representation in education of our own science, to say that the end of +a mathematical training is that the student should know the properties +of the nine-point circle? I ask you frankly, is it not rather a "come +down"? + +This generation of mathematical teachers has done so much strenuous +work in the way of reorganising mathematical instruction that there is +no need to despair of its being able to elaborate a curriculum which +shall leave in the minds of the pupils something even nobler than "the +ambiguous case." + +Let us think how this final review, closing the elementary course, +might be conducted for the more intelligent pupils. Partly no doubt +it requires a general oversight of the whole work done, considered +without undue detail so as to emphasise the general ideas used, and +their possibilities of importance when subjected to further study. Also +the analytical and geometrical ideas find immediate application in the +physical laboratory where a course of simple experimental mechanics +should have been worked through. Here the point of view is twofold, the +physical ideas and the mathematical ideas illustrate each other. + +The mathematical ideas are essential to the precise formulation of the +mechanical laws. The idea of a precise law of nature, the extent to +which such laws are in fact verified in our experience, and the rôle of +abstract thought in their formulation, then become practically apparent +to the pupil. The whole topic of course requires detailed development +with full particular illustration, and is not suggested as requiring +merely a few bare abstract statements. + +It would, however, be a grave error to put too much emphasis on the +mere process of direct explanation of the previous work by way of +final review. My point is, that the latter end of the course should +be so selected that in fact the general ideas underlying all the +previous mathematical work should be brought into prominence. This may +well be done by apparently entering on a new subject. For example, +the ideas of quantity and the ideas of number are fundamental to +all precise thought. In the previous stages they will not have been +sharply separated; and children are, rightly enough, pushed on to +algebra without too much bother and quantity. But the more intelligent +among them at the end of their curriculum would gain immensely by a +careful consideration of those fundamental properties of quantity in +general which lead to the introduction of numerical measurement. This +is a topic which also has the advantage that the necessary books are +actually to hand. Euclid's fifth book is regarded by those qualified +to judge as one of the triumphs of Greek mathematics. It deals with +this very point. Nothing can be more characteristic of the hopelessly +illiberal character of the traditional mathematical education than the +fact that this book has always been omitted. It deals with ideas, +and therefore was ostracised. Of course a careful selection of the +more important propositions and a careful revision of the argument are +required. This also is to hand in the publications of my immediate +predecessor in the office of president, Prof. Hill. Furthermore, in Sir +T. L. Heath's complete edition of Euclid, there is a full commentary +embodying most of what has been said and thought on the point. Thus +it is perfectly easy for teachers to inform themselves generally +on the topic. The whole book would not be wanted, but just the few +propositions which embody the fundamental ideas. The subject is not +fit for backward pupils; but certainly it could be made interesting to +the more advanced class. There would be great scope for interesting +discussion as to the nature of quantity, and the tests which we should +apply to ascertain when we are dealing with quantities. The work +would not be at all in the air, but would be illustrated at every +stage by reference to actual examples of cases where the quantitative +character is absent, or obscure, or doubtful, or evident. Temperature, +heat, electricity, pleasure and pain, mass and distance could all be +considered. + +Another idea which requires illustration is that of functionality. +A function in analysis is the counterpart of a law in the physical +universe, and of a curve in geometry. Children have studied the +relations of functions to curves from the first beginning of their +study of algebra, namely in drawing graphs. Of recent years there has +been a great reform in respect to graphs. But at its present stage it +has either gone too far or not far enough. It is not enough merely +to draw a graph. The idea behind the graph--like the man behind the +gun--is essential in order to make it effective. At present there is +some tendency merely to set the children to draw curves, and there to +leave the whole question. + +In the study of simple algebraic functions and of trigonometrical +functions we are initiating the study of the precise expression of +physical laws. Curves are another way of representing these laws. The +simple fundamental laws--such as the inverse square and the direct +distance--should be passed under review, and the applications of the +simple functions to express important concrete cases of physical laws +considered. I cannot help thinking that the final review of this topic +might well take the form of a study of some of the main ideas of the +differential calculus applied to simple curves. There is nothing +particularly difficult about the conception of a rate of change; and +the differentiation of a few powers of _x_, such as _x_^2, +_x_^3, etc., could easily be effected; perhaps by the aid of +geometry even sin _x_ and cos _x_ could be differentiated. +If we once abandon our fatal habit of cramming the children with +theorems which they do not understand, and will never use, there will +be plenty of time to concentrate their attention on really important +topics. We can give them familiarity with conceptions which really +influence thought. + +Before leaving this topic of physical laws and mathematical functions, +there are other points to be noticed. The fact that the precise law is +never really verified by observation in its full precision is capable +of easy illustration and of affording excellent examples. Again, +statistical laws, namely laws which are only satisfied on the average +by large numbers, can easily be studied and illustrated. In fact a +slight study of statistical methods and their application to social +phenomena affords one of the simplest examples of the application of +algebraic ideas. + +Another way in which the students' ideas can be generalised is by the +use of the History of Mathematics, conceived not as a mere assemblage +of the dates and names of men, but as an exposition of the general +current of thought which occasioned the subjects to be objects of +interest at the time of their first elaboration. The use of the History +of Mathematics is to be considered at a later stage of our proceedings +this afternoon. Accordingly I merely draw attention to it now, to +point out that perhaps it is the very subject which may best obtain the +results for which I am pleading. + +We have indicated two main topics, namely general ideas of quantity +and of laws of nature, which should be an object of study in the +mathematical curriculum of a liberal education. But there is another +side to mathematics which must not be overlooked. It is the chief +instrument for discipline in logical method. + +Now, what is logical method, and how can any one be trained in it? + +Logical method is more than the mere knowledge of valid types of +reasoning and practice in the concentration of mind necessary to +follow them. If it were only this, it would still be very important; +for the human mind was not evolved in the bygone ages for the sake of +reasoning, but merely to enable mankind with more art to hunt between +meals for fresh food supplies. Accordingly few people can follow close +reasoning without considerable practice. + +More than this is wanted to make a good reasoner, or even to enlighten +ordinary people with knowledge of what constitutes the essence of the +art. The art of reasoning consists in getting hold of the subject at +the right end, of seizing on the few general ideas which illuminate +the whole, and of persistently marshalling all subsidiary facts round +them. Nobody can be a good reasoner unless by constant practice he +has realised the importance of getting hold of the big ideas and of +hanging on to them like grim death. For this sort of training geometry +is, I think, better than algebra. The field of thought of algebra is +rather obscure, whereas space is an obvious insistent thing evident to +all. Then the process of simplification, or abstraction, by which all +irrelevant properties of matter, such as colour, taste, and weight, are +put aside is an education in itself. Again, the definitions and the +propositions assumed without proof illustrate the necessity of forming +clear notions of the fundamental facts of the subject-matter and of the +relations between them. All this belongs to the mere prolegomena of the +subject. When we come to its development, its excellence increases. The +learner is not initially confronted with any symbolism which bothers +the memory by its rules, however simple they may be. Also, from the +very beginning the reasoning, if properly conducted, is dominated by +well-marked ideas which guide each stage of development. Accordingly +the essence of logical method receives immediate exemplification. + +Let us now put aside for the moment the limitations introduced by +the dullness of average pupils and the pressure on time due to other +subjects, and consider what geometry has to offer in the way of a +liberal education. I will indicate some stages in the subject, +without meaning that necessarily they are to be studied in this +exclusive order. The first stage is the study of _congruence_. +Our perception of congruence is in practice dependent on our judgments +of the invariability of the intrinsic properties of bodies when their +external circumstances are varying. But however it arises, congruence +is in essence the correlation of two regions of space, point by point, +so that all homologous distances and all homologous angles are equal. +It is to be noticed that the definition of the equality of lengths and +angles is their congruence, and all tests of equality, such as the use +of the yard measure, are merely devices for making immediate judgments +of congruence easy. I make these remarks to suggest that apart from the +reasoning connected with it, congruence, both as an example of a larger +and very far-reaching idea and also for its own sake, is well worthy +of attentive consideration. The propositions concerning it elucidate +the elementary properties of the triangle, the parallelogram, and the +circle, and of the relations of two planes to each other. It is very +desirable to restrict the proved propositions of this part within the +narrowest bounds, partly by assuming redundant axiomatic propositions, +and partly by introducing only those propositions of absolutely +fundamental importance. + +The second stage is the study of similarity. This can be reduced to +three or four fundamental propositions. Similarity is an enlargement of +the idea of congruence, and, like that idea, is another example of a +one-to-one correlation of points of spaces. Any extension of study of +this subject might well be in the direction of the investigation of one +or two simple properties of similar and similarly situated rectilinear +figures. The whole subject receives its immediate applications in plans +and maps. It is important, however, to remember that trigonometry is +really the method by which the main theorems are made available for use. + +The third stage is the study of the elements of trigonometry. This is +the study of the periodicity introduced by rotation and of properties +preserved in a correlation of similar figures. Here for the first time +we introduce a slight use of the algebraic analysis founded on the +study of number and quantity. The importance of the periodic character +of the functions requires full illustration. The simplest properties of +the functions are the only ones required for the solution of triangles, +and the consequent applications to surveying. The wealth of formulæ, +often important in themselves, but entirely useless for this type of +study, which crowd our books should be rigorously excluded, except +so far as they are capable of being proved by the pupils as direct +examples of the bookwork. + +This question of the exclusion of formulæ is best illustrated by +considering this example of Trigonometry, though of course I may well +have hit on an unfortunate case in which my judgment is at fault. A +great part of the educational advantage of the subject can be obtained +by confining study to Trigonometry of one angle and by exclusion of the +addition formulæ for the sine and cosine of the sum of two angles. The +functions can be graphed, and the solution of triangles effected. Thus +the aspects of the science as (1) embodying analytically the immediate +results of some of the theorems deduced from congruence and similarity, +(2) as a solution of the main problem of surveying, (3) as a study of +the fundamental functions required to express periodicity and wave +motion, will all be impressed on the pupils' minds both by bookwork and +example. + +If it be desired to extend this course, the addition formulæ should +be added. But great care should be taken to exclude specialising +the pupils in the wealth of formulæ which comes in their train. By +"exclude" is meant that the pupils should not have spent time or energy +in acquiring any facility in their deduction. The teacher may find +it interesting to work a few such examples before a class. But such +results are not among those which learners need retain. Also, I would +exclude the whole subject of circumscribed and inscribed circles both +from Trigonometry and from the previous geometrical courses. It is +all very pretty, but I do not understand what its function is in an +elementary non-professional curriculum. + +Accordingly, the actual bookwork of the subject is reduced to very +manageable proportions. I was told the other day of an American college +where the students are expected to know by heart ninety formulæ or +results in Trigonometry alone. We are not quite so bad as that. In +fact, in Trigonometry we have nearly approached the ideal here sketched +out as far as our elementary courses are concerned. + +The fourth stage introduces Analytical Geometry. The study of graphs in +algebra has already employed the fundamental notions, and all that is +now required is a rigorously pruned course on the straight line, the +circle, and the three types of conic sections, defined by the forms of +their equations. At this point there are two remarks to be made. It is +often desirable to give our pupils mathematical information which we do +not prove. For example, in co-ordinate geometry, the reduction of the +general equation of the second degree is probably beyond the capacities +of most of the type of students whom we are considering. But that need +not prevent us from explaining the fundamental position of conics, as +exhausting the possible types of such curves. + +The second remark is to advocate the entire sweeping away of +geometrical conics as a separate subject. Naturally, on suitable +occasions the analysis of analytical geometry will be lightened by +the use of direct deduction from some simple figure. But geometrical +conics, as developed from the definition of a conic section by the +focus and directrix property, suffers from glaring defects. It is +hopelessly recondite. The fundamental definition of a conic, _SP_ = _e_ +· _PM_, usual in this subject at this stage, is thoroughly bad. It is +very recondite, and has no obvious importance. Why should such curves +be studied at all, any more than those defined by an indefinite number +of other formulæ? But when we have commenced the study of the Cartesian +methods, the equations of the first and second degrees are naturally +the first things to think about. + +In this ideal course of Geometry, the fifth stage is occupied with +the elements of Projective Geometry. The general ideas of cross ratio +and of projection are here fundamental. Projection is yet a more +general instance of that one-to-one correlation which we have already +considered under congruence and similarity. Here again we must avoid +the danger of being led into a bewildering wealth of detail. + +The intellectual idea which projective geometry is to illustrate is +the importance in reasoning of the correlation of all cases which +can be proved to possess in common certain identical properties. The +preservation of the projective properties in projection is the one +important educational idea of the subject. Cross ratio only enters +as the fundamental metrical property which is preserved. The few +propositions considered are selected to illustrate the two allied +processes which are made possible by this procedure. One is proof +by simplification. Here the simplification is psychological and not +logical--for the general case is logically the simplest. What is meant +is: Proof by considering the case which is in fact the most familiar to +us, or the easiest to think about. The other procedure is the deduction +of particular cases from known general truths, as soon as we have a +means of discovering such cases or a criterion for testing them. + +The projective definition of conic sections and the identity of the +results obtained with the curves derived from the general equation +of the second degree are capable of simple exposition, but lie on +the border-line of the subject. It is the sort of topic on which +information can be given, and the proofs suppressed. + +The course of geometry as here conceived in its complete ideal--and +ideals can never be realised--is not a long one. The actual amount +of mathematical deduction at each stage in the form of bookwork is +very slight. But much more explanation would be given, the importance +of each proposition being illustrated by examples, either worked out +or for students to work, so selected as to indicate the fields of +thought to which it applies. By such a course the student would gain an +analysis of the leading properties of space, and of the chief methods +by which they are investigated. + +The study of the elements of mathematics, conceived in this spirit, +would constitute a training in logical method together with an +acquisition of the precise ideas which lie at the base of the +scientific and philosophical investigations of the universe. Would it +be easy to continue the excellent reforms in mathematical instruction +which this generation has already achieved, so as to include in the +curriculum this wider and more philosophic spirit? Frankly, I think +that this result would be very hard to achieve as the result of +single individual efforts. For reasons which I have already briefly +indicated, all reforms in education are very difficult to effect. But +the continued pressure of combined effort, provided that the ideal is +really present in the minds of the mass of teachers, can do much, and +effects in the end surprising modification. Gradually the requisite +books get written, still more gradually the examinations are reformed +so as to give weight to the less technical aspects of the subject, and +then all recent experience has shown that the majority of teachers are +only too ready to welcome any practicable means of rescuing the subject +from the reproach of being a mechanical discipline. + + + + + CHAPTER V + + THE PRINCIPLES OF MATHEMATICS IN RELATION TO ELEMENTARY TEACHING + + (_International Congress of Mathematicians, Cambridge, August, + 1912_) + + +WE are concerned not with the advanced teaching of a few specialist +mathematical students, but with the mathematical education of the +majority of boys in our secondary schools. Again these boys must be +divided into two sections: one section consists of those who desire to +restrict their mathematical education; the other section is made up of +those who will require some mathematical training for their subsequent +professional careers, either in the form of definite mathematical +results or in the form of mathematically trained minds. + +I shall call the latter of these two sections the mathematical section, +and the former the non-mathematical section. But I must repeat that by +the mathematical section is meant that large number of boys who desire +to learn more than the minimum amount of mathematics. Furthermore, most +of my remarks about these sections of boys apply also to elementary +classes of our University students. + +The subject of this paper is the investigation of the place which +should be occupied by modern investigations respecting mathematical +principles in the education of both of these sections of school-boys. + +To find a foothold from which to start the inquiry, let us ask why the +non-mathematical section should be taught any mathematics at all beyond +the barest elements of arithmetic. What are the qualities of mind which +a mathematical training is designed to produce when it is employed as +an element in a liberal education? + +My answer, which applies equally to both sections of students, is +that there are two allied forms of mental discipline which should be +acquired by a well-designed mathematical course. These two forms though +closely allied are perfectly distinct. + +The first form of discipline is not in its essence logical at all. +It is the power of clearly grasping abstract ideas, and of relating +them to particular circumstances. In other words, the first use of +mathematics is to strengthen the power of abstract thought. I repeat +that in its essence this has nothing to do with logic, though as a +matter of fact a logical discipline is the best method of producing the +desired effect. It is not the philosophical theory of abstract ideas +which is to be acquired, but the habit and the power of using them. +There is one and only way of acquiring the habit and the power of using +anything, that is by the simple common-place method of habitually using +it. There is no other short cut. If in education we desire to produce +a certain conformation of mind, we must day by day, and year by year, +accustom the students' minds to grow into the desired structural shape. +Thus to teach the power of grasping abstract ideas and the habit of +using them, we must select a group of such ideas, which are important +and are also easy to think about because they are clear and definite. + +The fundamental mathematical truths concerning geometry, ratio, +quantity, and number, satisfy these conditions as do no others. Hence, +the fundamental universal position held by mathematics as an element of +a liberal education. + +But what are the fundamental mathematical truths concerning geometry, +quantity and number? + +At this point we come to the great question of the relation between +the modern science of the principles of mathematics and a mathematical +education. + +My answer to the question as to these fundamental mathematical truths +is, that in any absolute sense there are none. There is no unique +small body of independent primitive unproved propositions which are +the necessary starting points of all mathematical reasoning on these +subjects. In mathematical reasoning the only absolute necessary +pre-suppositions are those which make logical deduction possible. +Between these absolute logical truths and so-called fundamental truths +concerning geometry, quantity and number, there is a whole new world of +mathematical subjects concerning the logic of propositions, of classes, +and of relations. + +But this subject is too abstract to form an elementary training ground +in the difficult art of abstract thought. + +It is for this reason that we have to make a compromise and start from +such obvious general ideas as naturally occur to all men when they +perceive objects with their senses. + +In geometry, the ideas elaborated by the Greeks and presented by Euclid +are, roughly speaking, those adapted for our purpose, namely, ideas +of volumes, surfaces, lines, of straightness and of curvature, of +intersection and of congruence, of greater and less, of similarity, +shape, and scale. In fact, we use in education those general ideas of +spatial properties which must be habitually present in the mind of any +one who is to observe the world of phenomena with understanding. + +Thus we come back to Plato's opinion that for a liberal education, +geometry, as he knew it, is the queen of sciences. + +In addition to geometry, there remain the ideas of quantity, ratio, +and of number. This in practice means, elementary algebra. Here the +prominent ideas are those of "any number," in other words, the use +of the familiar _x_, _y_, _z_, and of the dependence of variables on +each other, or otherwise, the idea of functionality. All this is to be +gradually acquired by the continual use of the very simplest functions +which we can devise: of linear functions, graphically represented +by straight lines; of quadratic functions, graphically represented +by parabolas; and of those simple implicit functions, graphically +represented by conic sections. Thence, with good fortune and a willing +class, we can advance to the ideas of rates of increase, still +confining ourselves to the simplest possible cases. + +I wish here emphatically to remind you that both in geometry and in +algebra a clear grasp of these general ideas is not what the pupil +starts from, it is the goal at which he is to arrive. The method of +progression is continual practice in the consideration of the simplest +particular cases, and the goal is not philosophical analysis but the +power of use. + +But how is he to practise himself in their use? He cannot simply sit +down and think of the relation _y_ = _x_ + 1, he must employ +it in some simple obvious way. + +This brings us to the second power of mind which is to be produced by +a mathematical training, namely, the power of logical reasoning. Here +again, it is not the knowledge of the philosophy of logic which it is +essential to teach, but the habit of thinking logically. By logic, I +mean deductive logic. + +Deductive logic is the science of certain relations, such as +implication, etc., between general ideas. When logic begins, definite +particular individual things have been banished. I cannot relate +logically this thing to that thing, for example this pen to that pen, +except by the indirect way of relating some general idea which applies +to this pen to some general idea which applies to that pen. And the +individualities of the two pens are quite irrelevant to the logical +process. This process is entirely concerned with the two general ideas. +Thus the practice of logic is a certain way of employing the mind +in the consideration of such ideas; and an elementary mathematical +training is in fact nothing else but the logical use of the general +ideas respecting geometry and algebra which we have enumerated above. +It has therefore, as I started this paper by stating, a double +advantage. It makes the mind capable of abstract thought, and it +achieves this object by training the mind in the most important kind of +abstract thought, namely, deductive logic. + +I may remind you that other choices of a type of abstract thought +might be made. We might train the children to contemplate directly the +beauty of abstract moral ideas, in the hope of making them religious +mystics. The general practice of education has decided in favour of +logic, as exemplified in elementary mathematics. + +We have now to answer the further question, what is the rôle of +logical precision in the teaching of mathematics? Our general answer +to the implied question is obvious: logical precision is one of the +two objects of the teaching of mathematics, and it is the only weapon +by which the teaching of mathematics can achieve its other object. To +teach mathematics is to teach logical precision. A mathematical teacher +who has not taught that has taught nothing. + +But having stated this thesis in this unqualified way, its meaning must +be carefully explained; for otherwise its real bearing on the problem +will be entirely misunderstood. + +Logical precision is the faculty to be acquired. It is the quality of +mind which it is the object of the teaching to impart. Thus the habit +of reading great literature is the goal at which a literary education +aims. But we do not expect a child to start its first lesson by reading +for itself Shakespeare. We recognise that reading is impossible till +the pupil has learnt its alphabet and can spell, and then we start it +with books of one syllable. + +In the same way, a mathematical education should grow in logical +precision. It is folly to expect the same careful logical analysis at +the commencement of the training as would be appropriate at the end. +It is an entire misconception of my thesis to construe it as meaning +that a mathematical training should assume in the pupil a power of +concentrated logical thought. My thesis is in fact the exact opposite, +namely, that this power cannot be assumed, and has got to be acquired, +and that a mathematical training is nothing else than the process of +acquiring it. My whole groundwork of assumption is that this power does +not initially exist in a fully developed state. Of course like every +other power which is acquired, it must be developed gradually. + +The various stages of development must be guided by the judgment and +the genius of the teacher. But what is essential is, that the teacher +should keep clearly in his mind that it is just this power of logical +precise reasoning which is the whole object of his efforts. If his +pupils have in any measure gained this, they have gained all. + +We have not yet, however, fully considered this part of our subject. +Logical precision is the full realisation of the steps of the argument. +But what are the steps of the argument? The full statement of all the +steps is far too elaborate and difficult an operation to be introduced +into the mathematical reasoning of an educational curriculum. Such a +statement involves the introduction of abstract logical ideas which +are very difficult to grasp, because there is so rarely any need to +make them explicit in ordinary thought. They are therefore not a fit +subject-ground for an elementary education. + +I do not think that it is possible to draw any theoretical line +between those logical steps which form a theoretically full logical +investigation, and those which are full enough for most practical +purposes, including that of education. The question is one of +psychology, to be solved by a process of experiment. The object to be +attained is to gain that amount of logical alertness which will enable +its possessors to detect fallacy and to know the types of sound logical +deduction. The objects of going further are partly philosophical, and +also partly to lay bare abstract ideas whose investigation is in itself +important. But both these objects are foreign to education. + +My opinion is, that, on the whole, the type of logical precision handed +down to us by the Greek mathematicians is, roughly speaking, what we +want. In geometry, this means the sort of precision which we find in +Euclid. I do not mean that we should use his famous _Elements_ as +a text-book, nor that here and there a certain compression in his mode +of exposition is not advisable. All this is mere detail. What I do mean +is, that the sort of logical transition which he made explicit, we +should make explicit, and that the sort of transition which he omits, +we should omit. + +I doubt, however, whether it is desirable to plunge the student into +the full rigour of euclidean geometry without some mitigation. It is +for this reason that the modern habit, at least in England, of laying +great stress in the initial stages on training the pupil in simple +constructions from numerical data is to be praised. It means that after +a slight amount of reasoning on the euclidean basis of accuracy, the +mind of the learner is relieved by doing the things in various special +cases, and noting by rough measurements that the desired results are +actually attained. It is important, however, that the measurements +be not mistaken for the proofs. Their object is to make the beginner +apprehend what the abstract ideas really mean. + +Again in algebra, the notation and the practical use of the symbols +should be acquired in the simplest cases, and the more theoretical +treatment of the symbolism reserved to a suitable later stage. My +rule would be initially to learn the meaning of the ideas by a crude +practice in simple ways, and to refine the logical procedure in +preparation for an advance to greater generality. In fact the thesis of +my paper can be put in another way thus, the object of a mathematical +education is, to acquire the powers of analysis, of generalisation, +and of reasoning. The two processes of analysis and generalisation were +in my previous statement put together as the power of grasping abstract +ideas. + +But in order to analyse and to generalise, we must commence with the +crude material of ideas which are to be analysed and generalised. +Accordingly it is a positive error in education to start with the +ultimate products of this process, namely the ideas in their refined +analysed and generalised forms. We are thereby skipping an important +part of the training, which is to take the ideas as they actually exist +in the child's mind, and to exercise the child in the difficult art of +civilising them and clothing them. + +The schoolmaster is in fact a missionary, the savages are the ideas in +the child's mind; and the missionary shirks his main task if he refuse +to risk his body among the cannibals. + +At this point I should like to turn your attention to those pupils +forming the mathematical section. There is an idea, widely prevalent, +that it is possible to teach mathematics of a relatively advanced +type--such as differential calculus, for instance--in a way useful to +physicists and engineers without any attention to its logic or its +theory. + +This seems to me to be a profound mistake. It implies that a merely +mechanical knowledge without understanding of ways of arriving at +mathematical results is useful in applied science. It is of no use +whatever. The results themselves can all be found stated in the +appropriate pocket books and in other elementary works of reference. No +one when applying a result need bother himself as to why it is true. He +accepts it and applies it. What is of supreme importance in physics and +in engineering is a mathematically trained mind, and such a mind can +only be acquired by a proper mathematical discipline. + +I fully admit that the proper way to start such a subject as the +differential calculus is to plunge quickly into the use of the notation +in a few absurdly simple cases, with a crude explanation of the idea +of rates of increase. The notation as thus known can then be used by +the lecturers in the Physical and Engineering Laboratories. But the +mathematical training of the applied scientists consists in making +these ideas precise and the proofs accurate. + +I hope that the thesis of this paper respecting the position of logical +precision in the teaching of mathematics has been rendered plain. The +habit of logical precision with its necessary concentration of thought +upon abstract ideas is not wholly possible in the initial stages of +learning. It is the ideal at which the teacher should aim. Also logical +precision, in the sense of logical explicitness, is not an absolute +thing: it is an affair of more or less. Accordingly the quantity of +explicitness to be introduced at each stage of progress must depend +upon the practical judgment of the teacher. Lastly, in a sense, the +instructed mind is less explicit; for it travels more quickly over a +well-remembered path, and may save the trouble of putting into words +trains of thought which are very obvious to it. But on the other +hand it atones for this rapidity by a concentration on every subtle +point where a fallacy can lurk. The habit of logical precision is the +instinct for the subtle difficulty. + + + + + CHAPTER VI + + THE ORGANISATION OF THOUGHT + + (_Presidential Address to Section A, British Association, Newcastle, + 1916_) + + +THE subject of this address is the organisation of thought, a topic +evidently capable of many diverse modes of treatment. I intend more +particularly to give some account of that department of logical science +with which some of my own studies have been connected. But I am +anxious, if I can succeed in so doing, to handle this account so as to +exhibit the relation with certain considerations which underlie general +scientific activities. + +It is no accident that an age of science has developed into an age +of organisation. Organised thought is the basis of organised action. +Organisation is the adjustment of diverse elements so that their +mutual relations may exhibit some predetermined quality. An epic poem +is a triumph of organisation, that is to say, it is a triumph in the +unlikely event of its being a good epic poem. It is the successful +organisation of multitudinous sounds of words, associations of words, +pictorial memories of diverse events and feelings ordinarily occurring +in life, combined with a special narrative of great events: the whole +so disposed as to excite emotions which, as defined by Milton, are +simple, sensuous, and passionate. The number of successful epic poems +is commensurate, or rather, is inversely commensurate, with the obvious +difficulty of the task of organisation. + +Science is the organisation of thought. But the example of the epic +poem warns us that science is not any organisation of thought. It is +an organisation of a certain definite type which we will endeavour to +determine. + +Science is a river with two sources, the practical source and the +theoretical source. The practical source is the desire to direct our +actions to achieve predetermined ends. For example, the British nation, +fighting for justice, turns to science, which teaches it the importance +of compounds of nitrogen. The theoretical source is the desire to +understand. Now I am going to emphasise the importance of theory in +science. But to avoid misconception I most emphatically state that I +do not consider one source as in any sense nobler than the other, or +intrinsically more interesting. I cannot see why it is nobler to strive +to understand than to busy oneself with the right ordering of one's +actions. Both have their bad sides; there are evil ends directing +actions, and there are ignoble curiosities of the understanding. + +The importance, even in practice, of the theoretical side of science +arises from the fact that action must be immediate, and takes place +under circumstances which are excessively complicated. If we wait for +the necessities of action before we commence to arrange our ideas, in +peace we shall have lost our trade, and in war we shall have lost the +battle. Success in practice depends on theorists who, led by other +motives of exploration, have been there before, and by some good chance +have hit upon the relevant ideas. By a theorist I do not mean a man who +is up in the clouds, but a man whose motive for thought is the desire +to formulate correctly the rules according to which events occur. A +successful theorist should be excessively interested in immediate +events, otherwise he is not at all likely to formulate correctly +anything about them. Of course, both sources of science exist in all +men. + +Now, what is this thought organisation which we call science? The +first aspect of modern science which struck thoughtful observers was +its inductive character. The nature of induction, its importance, and +the rules of inductive logic have been considered by a long series of +thinkers, especially English thinkers: Bacon, Herschel, J. S. Mill, +Venn, Jevons, and others. I am not going to plunge into an analysis +of the process of induction. Induction is the machinery and not the +product, and it is the product which I want to consider. When we +understand the product we shall be in a stronger position to improve +the machinery. + +First, there is one point which it is necessary to emphasise. There +is a tendency in analysing scientific processes to assume a given +assemblage of concepts applying to nature, and to imagine that the +discovery of laws of nature consists in selecting by means of inductive +logic some one out of a definite set of possible alternative relations +which may hold between the things in nature answering to these obvious +concepts. In a sense this assumption is fairly correct, especially +in regard to the earlier stages of science. Mankind found itself in +possession of certain concepts respecting nature--for example, the +concept of fairly permanent material bodies--and proceeded to determine +laws which related the corresponding percepts in nature. But the +formulation of laws changed the concepts, sometimes gently by an added +precision, sometimes violently. At first this process was not much +noticed, or at least was felt to be a process curbed within narrow +bounds, not touching fundamental ideas. At the stage where we now +are, the formulation of the concepts can be seen to be as important +as the formulation of the empirical laws connecting the events in the +universe as thus conceived by us. For example, the concepts of life, +of heredity, of a material body, of a molecule, of an atom, of an +electron, of energy, of space, of time, of quantity, and of number. I +am not dogmatising about the best way of getting such ideas straight. +Certainly it will only be done by those who have devoted themselves to +a special study of the facts in question. Success is never absolute, +and progress in the right direction is the result of a slow, gradual +process of continual comparison of ideas with facts. The criterion of +success is that we should be able to formulate empirical laws, that is, +statements of relations, connecting the various parts of the universe +as thus conceived, laws with the property that we can interpret the +actual events of our lives as being our fragmentary knowledge of this +conceived interrelated whole. + +But, for the purpose of science, what is the actual world? Has science +to wait for the termination of the metaphysical debate till it can +determine its own subject-matter? I suggest that science has a much +more homely starting-ground. Its task is the discovery of the relations +which exist within that flux of perceptions, sensations, and emotions +which forms our experience of life. The panorama yielded by sight, +sound, taste, smell, touch, and by more inchoate sensible feelings, +is the sole field of activity. It is in this way that science is the +thought organisation of experience. The most obvious aspect of this +field of actual experience is its disorderly character. It is for +each person a _continuum_, fragmentary, and with elements not +clearly differentiated. The comparison of the sensible experiences of +diverse people brings its own difficulties. I insist on the radically +untidy, ill-adjusted character of the fields of actual experience from +which science starts. To grasp this fundamental truth is the first +step in wisdom, when constructing a philosophy of science. This fact +is concealed by the influence of language, moulded by science, which +foists on us exact concepts as though they represented the immediate +deliverances of experience. The result is, that we imagine that we have +immediate experience of a world of perfectly defined objects implicated +in perfectly defined events which, as known to us by the direct +deliverance of our senses, happen at exact instants of time, in a space +formed by exact points, without parts and without magnitude: the neat, +trim, tidy, exact world which is the goal of scientific thought. + +My contention is, that this world is a world of ideas, and that its +internal relations are relations between abstract concepts, and that +the elucidation of the precise connection between this world and the +feelings of actual experience is the fundamental question of scientific +philosophy. The question which I am inviting you to consider is this: +How does exact thought apply to the fragmentary, vague _continua_ +of experience? I am not saying that it does not apply: quite the +contrary. But I want to know how it applies. The solution I am +asking for is not a phrase, however brilliant, but a solid branch of +science, constructed with slow patience, showing in detail how the +correspondence is effected. + +The first great steps in the organisation of thought were due +exclusively to the practical source of scientific activity, without +any admixture of theoretical impulse. Their slow accomplishment was +the cause and also the effect of the gradual evolution of moderately +rational beings. I mean the formation of the concepts of definite +material objects, of the determinate lapse of time, of simultaneity, +of recurrence, of definite relative position, and of analogous +fundamental ideas, according to which the flux of our experience is +mentally arranged for handy reference: in fact, the whole apparatus of +commonsense thought. Consider in your mind some definite chair. The +concept of that chair is simply the concept of all the interrelated +experiences connected with that chair--namely, of the experience of the +folk who made it, of the folk who sold it, of the folk who have seen +it or used it, of the man who is now experiencing a comfortable sense +of support, combined with our expectations of an analogous future, +terminated finally by a different set of experiences when the chair +collapses and becomes firewood. The formation of that type of concept +was a tremendous job, and zoologists and geologists tell us that it +took many tens of millions of years. I can well believe it. + +I now emphasise two points. In the first place, science is rooted in +what I have just called the whole apparatus of commonsense thought. +That is the _datum_ from which it starts, and to which it +must recur. We may speculate, if it amuses us, of other beings in +other planets who have arranged analogous experiences according to +an entirely different conceptual code--namely, who have directed +their chief attention to different relations between their various +experiences. But the task is too complex, too gigantic, to be revised +in its main outlines. You may polish up commonsense, you may contradict +it in detail, you may surprise it. But ultimately your whole task is to +satisfy it. + +In the second place, neither commonsense nor science can proceed with +their task of thought organisation without departing in some respect +from the strict consideration of what is actual in experience. Think +again of the chair. Among the experiences upon which its concept is +based, I included our expectations of its future history. I should +have gone further and included our imagination of all the possible +experiences which in ordinary language we should call perceptions of +the chair which might have occurred. This is a difficult question, and +I do not see my way through it. But, at present, in the construction of +a theory of space and of time there seem insuperable difficulties if we +refuse to admit ideal experiences. + +This imaginative perception of experiences, which, if they occurred, +would be coherent with our actual experiences, seems fundamental in our +lives. It is neither wholly arbitrary, nor yet fully determined. It +is a vague background which is only made in part definite by isolated +activities of thought. Consider, for example, our thoughts of the +unseen flora of Brazil. + +Ideal experiences are closely connected with our imaginative +reproduction of the actual experiences of other people, and also +with our almost inevitable conception of ourselves as receiving our +impressions from an external complex reality beyond ourselves. It +may be that an adequate analysis of every source and every type of +experience yields demonstrative proof of such a reality and of its +nature. Indeed, it is hardly to be doubted that this is the case. The +precise elucidation of this question is the problem of metaphysics. One +of the points which I am urging in this address is, that the basis of +science does not depend on the assumption of any of the conclusions of +metaphysics; but that both science and metaphysics start from the same +given groundwork of immediate experience, and in the main proceed in +opposite directions on their diverse tasks. + +For example, metaphysics inquires how our perceptions of the chair +relate us to some true reality. Science gathers up these perceptions +into a determinate class, adds to them ideal perceptions of analogous +sort, which under assignable circumstances would be obtained, and this +single concept of that set of perceptions is all that science needs; +unless indeed you prefer that thought find its origin in some legend of +those great twin brethren, the Cock and Bull. + +My immediate problem is to inquire into the nature of the texture of +science. Science is essentially logical. The nexus between its concepts +is a logical nexus, and the grounds for its detailed assertions +are logical grounds. King James said, "No bishops, no king." With +greater confidence we can say, "No logic, no science." The reason for +the instinctive dislike which most men of science feel towards the +recognition of this truth is, I think, the barren failure of logical +theory during the past three or four centuries. We may trace this +failure back to the worship of authority, which in some respects +increased in the learned world at the time of the Renaissance. Mankind +then changed its authority, and this fact temporally acted as an +emancipation. But the main fact, and we can find complaints[2] of it +at the very commencement of the modern movement, was the establishment +of a reverential attitude towards any statement made by a classical +author. Scholars became commentators on truths too fragile to bear +translation. A science which hesitates to forget its founders is lost. +To this hesitation I ascribe the barrenness of logic. Another reason +for distrust of logical theory and of mathematics is the belief that +deductive reasoning can give you nothing new. Your conclusions are +contained in your premises, which by hypothesis are known to you. + +In the first place this last condemnation of logic neglects the +fragmentary, disconnected character of human knowledge. To know one +premise on Monday, and another premise on Tuesday, is useless to you +on Wednesday. Science is a permanent record of premises, deductions, +and conclusions, verified all along the line by its correspondence +with facts. Secondly, it is untrue that when we know the premises we +also know the conclusions. In arithmetic, for example, mankind are not +calculating boys. Any theory which proves that they are conversant with +the consequences of their assumptions must be wrong. We can imagine +beings who possess such insight. But we are not such creatures. +Both these answers are, I think, true and relevant. But they are +not satisfactory. They are too much in the nature of bludgeons, +too external. We want something more explanatory of the very real +difficulty which the question suggests. In fact, the true answer is +embedded in the discussion of our main problem of the relation of logic +to natural science. + +It will be necessary to sketch in broad outline some relevant features +of modern logic. In doing so I shall try to avoid the profound general +discussions and the minute technical classifications which occupy the +main part of traditional logic. It is characteristic of a science in +its earlier stages--and logic has become fossilised in such a stage--to +be both ambitiously profound in its aims and trivial in its handling of +details. + +We can discern four departments of logical theory. By an analogy +which is not so very remote I will call these departments or sections +the arithmetic section, the algebraic section, the section of +general-function theory, the analytical section. I do not mean that +arithmetic arises in the first section, algebra in the second section, +and so on; but the names are suggestive of certain qualities of +thought in each section which are reminiscent of analogous qualities +in arithmetic, in algebra, in the general theory of a mathematical +function, and in the mathematical analysis of the properties of +particular functions. + +The first section--namely, the arithmetic stage--deals with the +relations of definite propositions to each other, just as arithmetic +deals with definite numbers. Consider any definite proposition; call +it "_p_." We conceive that there is always another proposition which +is the direct contradictory to "_p_"; call it "not-_p_." When we have +got two propositions, _p_ and _q_, we can form derivative propositions +from them, and from their contradictories. We can say, "At last one of +_p_ or _q_ is true, and perhaps both." Let us call this proposition +"_p_ or _q_." I may mention as an aside that one of the greatest living +philosophers has stated that this use of the word "or"--namely, "_p_ or +_q_" in the sense that either or both may be true--makes him despair of +exact expression. We must brave his wrath, which is unintelligible to +me. + +We have thus got hold of four new propositions, namely, "_p_ or _q_," +and "not-_p_ or _q_," and "_p_ or not-_q_," and "not-_p_ or not-_q_." +Call these the set of disjunctive derivatives. There are, so far, +in all eight propositions, _p_, not-_p_, _q_, not-_q_, and the four +disjunctive derivatives. Any pair of these eight propositions can be +taken, and substituted for _p_ and _q_ in the foregoing treatment. +Thus each pair yields eight propositions, some of which may have been +obtained before. By proceeding in this way we arrive at an unending set +of propositions of growing complexity, ultimately derived from the two +original propositions _p_ or _q_. Of course, only a few are important. +Similarly we can start from three propositions, _p_, _q_, _r_, or +from four propositions, _p_, _q_, _r_, _s_, and so on. Any one of the +propositions of these aggregates may be true or false. It has no other +alternative. Whichever it is, true or false, call it the "truth-value" +of the proposition. + +The first section of logical inquiry is to settle what we know of the +truth-values of these propositions, when we know the truth-values of +some of them. The inquiry, so far as it is worth while carrying it, +is not very abstruse, and the best way of expressing its results is a +detail which I will not now consider. This inquiry forms the arithmetic +stage. + +The next section of logic is the algebraic stage. Now, the difference +between arithmetic and algebra is, that in arithmetic definite +numbers are considered, and in algebra symbols--namely, letters--are +introduced which stand for any numbers. The idea of a number is also +enlarged. These letters, standing for any numbers, are called sometimes +variables and sometimes parameters. Their essential characteristic is +that they are undetermined, unless, indeed, the algebraic conditions +which they satisfy implicitly determine them. Then they are sometimes +called unknowns. An algebraic formula with letters is a blank form. It +becomes a determinate arithmetic statement when definite numbers are +substituted for the letters. The importance of algebra is a tribute to +the study of form. Consider now the following proposition-- + + The specific heat of mercury is 0·033. + +This is a definite proposition which, with certain limitations, is +true. But the truth-value of the proposition does not immediately +concern us. Instead of mercury put a mere letter which is the name of +some undetermined thing: we get-- + + The specific heat of _x_ is 0·033. + +This is not a proposition; it has been called by Russell a +propositional function. It is the logical analogy of an algebraic +expression. Let us write ƒ(_x_) for any propositional function. + +We could also generalise still further, and say, + + The specific heat of _x_ is _y_. + +We thus get another propositional function, F(_x_, _y_), +of two arguments _x_ and _y_, and so on for any number of +arguments. + +Now, consider ƒ(_x_). There is the range of values of _x_, +for which ƒ(_x_) is a proposition, true or false. For values of +_x_ outside this range, ƒ(_x_) is not a proposition at all, +and is neither true nor false. It may have vague suggestions for us, +but it has no unit meaning of definite assertion. For example, + + The specific heat of water is 0·033 + +is a proposition which is false; and-- + + The specific heat of virtue is 0·033 + +is, I should imagine, not a proposition at all; so that it is neither +true nor false, though its component parts raise various associations +in our minds. This range of values, for which ƒ(_x_) has sense, is +called the "type" of the argument _x_. + +But there is also a range of values of _x_ for which ƒ(_x_) +is a true proposition. This is the class of those values of the +argument which _satisfy_ ƒ(_x_). This class may have no +members, or, in the other extreme, the class may be the whole type of +the arguments. + +We thus conceive two general propositions respecting the indefinite +number of propositions which share in the same logical form, that is, +which are values of the same propositional function. One of these +propositions is, + + ƒ(_x_) yields a true proposition for each value of _x_ of + the proper type; + +the other proposition is, + + There is a value of _x_ for which ƒ(_x_) is true. + +Given two, or more, propositional functions ƒ(_x_) and ϕ(_x_) +with the same argument _x_, we form derivative propositional +functions, namely, + +ƒ(_x_) or ϕ(_x_), ƒ(_x_) or not-ϕ(_x_), + +and so on with the contradictories, obtaining, as in the arithmetical +stage, an unending aggregate of propositional functions. Also each +propositional function yields two general propositions. The theory +of the interconnection between the truth-values of the general +propositions arising from any such aggregate of propositional functions +forms a simple and elegant chapter of mathematical logic. + +In this algebraic section of logic the theory of types crops up, as we +have already noted. It cannot be neglected without the introduction of +error. Its theory has to be settled at least by some safe hypothesis, +even if it does not go to the philosophic basis of the question. This +part of the subject is obscure and difficult, and has not been finally +elucidated, though Russell's brilliant work has opened out the subject. + +The final impulse to modern logic comes from the independent discovery +of the importance of the logic variable by Frege and Peano. Frege went +further than Peano, but by an unfortunate symbolism rendered his work +so obscure that no one fully recognised his meaning who had not found +it out for himself. But the movement has a large history reaching back +to Leibniz and even to Aristotle. Among English contributors are De +Morgan, Boole, and Sir Alfred Kempe; their work is of the first rank. + +The third logical section is the stage of general-function theory. +In logical language, we perform in this stage the transition from +intension to extension, and investigate the theory of denotation. Take +the propositional function, ƒ(_x_). There is the class, or range +of values for _x_, whose members satisfy ƒ(_x_). But the same +range may be the class whose members satisfy another propositional +function ϕ(_x_). It is necessary to investigate how to indicate +the class by a way which is indifferent as between the various +propositional functions which are satisfied by any member of it, and of +it only. What has to be done is to analyse the nature of propositions +about a class--namely, those propositions whose truth-values depend on +the class itself and not on the particular meaning by which the class +is indicated. + +Furthermore, there are propositions about alleged individuals +indicated by descriptive phrases: for example, propositions about "the +present King of England," who does exist, and "the present Emperor +of Brazil," who does not exist. More complicated, but analogous, +questions involving propositional functions of two variables involve +the notion of "correlation," just as functions of one argument involve +classes. Similarly functions of three arguments yield three-cornered +correlations, and so on. This logical section is one which Russell has +made peculiarly his own by work which must always remain fundamental. +I have called this the section of functional theory, because its +ideas are essential to the construction of logical denoting functions +which include as a special case ordinary mathematical functions, such +as sine, logarithm, etc. In each of these three stages it will be +necessary gradually to introduce an appropriate symbolism, if we are to +pass on to the fourth stage. + +The fourth logical section, the analytic stage, is concerned with the +investigation of the properties of special logical constructions, +that is, of classes and correlations of special sorts. The whole of +mathematics is included here. So the section is a large one. In fact, +it is mathematics, neither more nor less, but it includes an analysis +of mathematical ideas not hitherto included in the scope of that +science, nor, indeed, contemplated at all. The essence of this stage is +construction. It is by means of suitable constructions that the great +framework of applied mathematics, comprising the theories of number, +quantity, time, and space, is elaborated. + +It is impossible, even in brief outline, to explain how mathematics +is developed from the concepts of class and correlation, including +many-cornered correlations, which are established in the third section. +I can only allude to the headings of the process, which is fully +developed in the work, _Principia Mathematica_, by Mr. Russell +and myself. There are in this process of development seven special +sorts of correlations which are of peculiar interest. The first sort +comprises one-to-many, many-to-one, and one-to-one correlations. +The second sort comprises serial relations, that is, correlations +by which the members of some field are arranged in serial order, so +that, in the sense defined by the relation, any member of the field +is either before or after any other member. The third class comprises +inductive relations, that is, correlations on which the theory of +mathematical induction depends. The fourth class comprises selective +relations, which are required for the general theory of arithmetic +operations, and elsewhere. It is in connection with such relations that +the famous multiplicative axiom arises for consideration. The fifth +class comprises vector relations, from which the theory of quantity +arises. The sixth class comprises ratio relations, which interconnect +number and quantity. The seventh class comprises three-cornered and +four-cornered relations which occur in geometry. + +A bare enumeration of technical names, such as the above, is not very +illuminating, though it may help to a comprehension of the demarcations +of the subject. Please remember that the names are technical names, +meant, no doubt, to be suggestive, but used in strictly defined +senses. We have suffered much from critics who consider it sufficient +to criticise our procedure on the slender basis of a knowledge of +the dictionary meanings of such terms. For example, a one-to-one +correlation depends on the notion of a class with only one member, and +this notion is defined without appeal to the concept of the number one. +The notion of diversity is all that is wanted. Thus the class α has +only one member, if (1) the class of values of _x_ which satisfies +the propositional function, + + _x_ is not a member of α, + +is not the whole type of relevant values of _x_, and if (2) the +propositional function, + + _x_ and _y_ are members of α, and _x_ is diverse from + _y_ + +is false, whatever be the values of _x_ and _y_ in the +relevant type. + +Analogous procedures are obviously possible for higher finite cardinal +members. Thus, step by step, the whole cycle of current mathematical +ideas is capable of logical definition. The process is detailed and +laborious, and, like all science, knows nothing of a royal road of +airy phrases. The essence of the process is, first, to construct +the notion in terms of the forms of propositions, that is, in terms +of the relevant propositional functions, and secondly, to prove the +fundamental truths which hold about the notion by reference to the +results obtained in the algebraic section of logic. + +It will be seen that in this process the whole apparatus of special +indefinable mathematical concepts, and special _a priori_ +mathematical premises, respecting number, quantity, and space, has +vanished. Mathematics is merely an apparatus for analysing the +deductions which can be drawn from any particular premises, supplied +by commonsense, or by more refined scientific observation, so far as +these deductions depend on the forms of the propositions. Propositions +of certain forms are continually occurring in thought. Our existing +mathematics is the analysis of deductions which concern those forms and +in some way are important, either from practical utility or theoretical +interest. Here I am speaking of the science as it in fact exists. A +theoretical definition of mathematics must include in its scope any +deductions depending on the mere forms of propositions. But, of course +no one would wish to develop that part of mathematics which in no sense +is of importance. + +This hasty summary of logical ideas suggests some reflections. The +question arises, How many forms of propositions are there? The +answer is, An unending number. The reason for the supposed sterility +of logical science can thus be discerned. Aristotle founded the +science by conceiving the idea of the form of a proposition, and by +conceiving deduction as taking place in virtue of the forms. But he +confined propositions to four forms, now named A, I, E, O. So long as +logicians were obsessed by this unfortunate restriction, real progress +was impossible. Again, in their theory of form, both Aristotle and +subsequent logicians came very near to the theory of the logical +variable. But to come very near to a true theory, and to grasp its +precise application, are two very different things, as the history of +science teaches us. Everything of importance has been said before by +somebody who did not discover it. + +Again, one reason why logical deductions are not obvious is, that +logical form is not a subject which ordinarily enters into thought. +Commonsense deduction probably moves by blind instinct from concrete +proposition to concrete proposition, guided by some habitual +association of ideas. Thus commonsense fails in the presence of a +wealth of material. + +A more important question is the relation of induction, based on +observation, to deductive logic. There is a tradition of opposition +between adherents of induction and of deduction. In my view, it +would be just as sensible for the two ends of a worm to quarrel. +Both observation and deduction are necessary for any knowledge worth +having. We cannot get at an inductive law without having recourse to a +propositional function. For example, take the statement of observed +fact, + + This body is mercury, and its specific heat is 0·033. + +The propositional function is formed, + + Either _x_ is not mercury, or its specific heat is 0·033. + +The inductive law is the assumption of the truth of the general +proposition, that the above propositional function is true for every +value of _x_ in the relevant type. + +But it is objected that this process and its consequences are so simple +that an elaborate science is out of place. In the same way, a British +sailor knows the salt sea when he sails over it. What, then, is the use +of an elaborate chemical analysis of sea-water? There is the general +answer, that you cannot know too much of methods which you always +employ; and there is the special answer, that logical forms and logical +implications are not so very simple, and that the whole of mathematics +is evidence to this effect. + +One great use of the study of logical method is not in the region of +elaborate deduction, but to guide us in the study of the formation of +the main concepts of science. Consider geometry, for example. What are +the points which compose space? Euclid tells us that they are without +parts and without magnitude. But how is the notion of a point derived +from the sense-perceptions from which science starts? Certainly points +are not direct deliverances of the senses. Here and there we may see or +unpleasantly feel something suggestive of a point. But this is a rare +phenomenon, and certainly does not warrant the conception of space as +composed of points. Our knowledge of space properties is not based on +any observations of relations between points. It arises from experience +of relations between bodies. Now a fundamental space-relation between +bodies is that one body may be part of another. We are tempted to +define the "whole and part" relation by saying that the points occupied +by the part are some of the points occupied by the whole. But "whole +and part" being more fundamental than the notion of "point," this +definition is really circular and vicious. + +We accordingly ask whether any other definition of "spatial whole and +part" can be given. I think that it can be done in this way, though, +if I be mistaken, it is unessential to my general argument. We have +come to the conclusion that an extended body is nothing else than the +class of perception of it by all its percipients, actual or ideal. Of +course, it is not any class of perceptions, but a certain definite sort +of class which I have not defined here, except by the vicious method +of saying that they are perceptions of body. Now, the perceptions of a +part of a body are among the perceptions which compose the whole body. +Thus two bodies _a_ and _b_ are both classes of perceptions; and _b_ is +part of _a_ when the class which is _b_ is contained in the class which +is _a_. It immediately follows from the logical form of this definition +that if _b_ is part of _a_, and _c_ is part of _b_, then _c_ is part of +_a_. Thus the relation "whole to part" is transitive. Again, it will +be convenient to allow that a body is part of itself. This is a mere +question of how you draw the definition. With this understanding, the +relation is reflexive. Finally, if _a_ is part of _b_, and _b_ is part +of _a_, then _a_ and _b_ must be identical. These properties of "whole +and part" are not fresh assumptions, they follow from the logical form +of our definition. + +One assumption has to be made if we assume the ideal infinite +divisibility of space. Namely, we assume that every class of +perceptions which is an extended body contains other classes of +perceptions which are extended bodies diverse from itself. This +assumption makes rather a large draft on the theory of ideal +perceptions. Geometry vanishes unless in some form you make it. The +assumption is not peculiar to my exposition. + +It is then possible to define what we mean by a point. A point is the +class of extended objects which, in ordinary language, contain that +point. The definition, without presupposing the idea of a point, is +rather elaborate, and I have not now time for its statement. + +The advantage of introducing points into geometry is the simplicity +of the logical expression of their mutual relations. For science, +simplicity of definition is of slight importance, but simplicity of +mutual relations is essential. Another example of this law is the way +physicists and chemists have dissolved the simple idea of an extended +body, say of a chair, which a child understands, into a bewildering +notion of a complex dance of molecules and atoms and electrons and +waves of light. They have thereby gained notions with simpler logical +relations. + +Space as thus conceived is the exact formulation of the properties of +the apparent space of the commonsense world of experience. It is not +necessarily the best mode of conceiving the space of the physicist. +The one essential requisite is that the correspondence between the +commonsense world in its space and the physicists' world in its space +should be definite and reciprocal. + +I will now break off the exposition of the function of logic in +connection with the science of natural phenomena. I have endeavoured +to exhibit it as the organising principle, analysing the derivation +of the concepts from the immediate phenomena, examining the structure +of the general propositions which are the assumed laws of nature, +establishing their relations to each other in respect to reciprocal +implications, deducing the phenomena we may expect under given +circumstances. + +Logic, properly used, does not shackle thought. It gives freedom, and +above all, boldness. Illogical thought hesitates to draw conclusions, +because it never knows either what it means, or what it assumes, or +how far it trusts its own assumptions, or what will be the effect of +any modification of assumptions. Also the mind untrained in that part +of constructive logic which is relevant to the subject in hand will be +ignorant of the sort of conclusions which follow from various sorts of +assumptions, and will be correspondingly dull in divining the inductive +laws. The fundamental training in this relevant logic is, undoubtedly, +to ponder with an active mind over the known facts of the case, +directly observed. But where elaborate deductions are possible, this +mental activity requires for its full exercise the direct study of the +abstract logical relations. This is applied mathematics. + +Neither logic without observation, nor observation without logic, can +move one step in the formation of science. We may conceive humanity +as engaged in an internecine conflict between youth and age. Youth is +not defined by years but by the creative impulse to make something. The +aged are those who, before all things, desire not to make a mistake. +Logic is the olive branch from the old to the young, the wand which in +the hands of youth has the magic property of creating science. + + +FOOTNOTES: + +[Footnote 2: _E.g._ in 1551 by Italian schoolmen; cf. Sarpi's +_History of the Council of Trent_, under that date.] + + + + + CHAPTER VII + + THE ANATOMY OF SOME SCIENTIFIC IDEAS + + + _I. Fact_ + +THE characteristic of physical science is, that it ignores all +judgments of value: for example, æsthetic or moral judgments. It is +purely matter-of-fact, and this is the sense in which we must interpret +the sonorous phrase, "Man, the servant and the minister of Nature." + +The sphere of thought which is thus left is even then too wide for +physical science. It would include Ontology, namely, the determination +of the nature of what truly exists; in other words, Metaphysics. From +an abstract point of view this exclusion of metaphysical inquiry +is a pity. Such an inquiry is a necessary critique of the worth of +science, to tell us what it all comes to. The reasons for its careful +separation from scientific thought are purely practical; namely, +because we can agree about science--after due debate--whereas in +respect to metaphysics debate has hitherto accentuated disagreement. +These characteristics of science and metaphysics were unexpected in the +early days of civilised thought. The Greeks thought that metaphysics +was easier than physics, and tended to deduce scientific principles +from _a priori_ conceptions of the nature of things. They were +restrained in this disastrous tendency by their vivid naturalism, their +delight in first-hand perception. Mediæval Europe shared the tendency +without the restraint. It is possible that some distant generations +may arrive at unanimous conclusions on ontological questions, whereas +scientific progress may have led to ingrained opposing veins of +thought which can neither be reconciled nor abandoned. In such times +metaphysics and physical science will exchange their rôles. Meanwhile +we must take the case as we find it. + +But a problem remains. How can mankind agree about science without +a preliminary determination of what really is? The answer must be +found in an analysis of the facts which form the field of scientific +activity. Mankind perceives, and finds itself thinking about its +perceptions. It is the thought that matters and not that element of +perception which is not thought. When the immediate judgment has been +formed--Hullo, red!--it does not matter if we can imagine that in other +circumstances--in better circumstances, perhaps--the judgment would +have been--Hullo, blue!--or even--Hullo, nothing! For all intents and +purposes, at the time it was red. Everything else is hypothetical +reconstruction. The field of physical science is composed of these +primary thoughts, and of thoughts about these thoughts. + +But--to avoid confusion--a false simplicity has been introduced above +into the example given of a primary perceptive thought. "Hullo, red!" +is not really a primary perceptive thought, though it often is the +first thought which finds verbal expression even silently in the mind. +Nothing is in isolation. The perception of red is of a red object in +its relations to the whole content of the perceiving consciousness. + +Among the most easily analysed of such relations are the space +relations. Again the red object is in immediate perception nothing else +than a red object. It is better termed an "object of redness." Thus a +better approximation to an immediate perceptive judgment is, "Hullo, +object of redness there!" But, of course, in this formulation other +more complex relations are omitted. + +This tendency towards a false simplicity in scientific analysis, to +an excessive abstraction, to an over-universalising of universals, +is derived from the earlier metaphysical stage. It arises from the +implicit belief that we are endeavouring to qualify the real with +appropriate adjectives. In conformity with this tendency we think, +"this real thing is red." Whereas our true goal is to make explicit +our perception of the apparent in terms of its relations. What we +perceive is redness related to other apparents. Our object is the +analysis of the relations. + +One aim of science is the harmony of thought, that is, to secure +that judgments which are logical contraries should not be +thought-expressions of consciousness. Another aim is the extension of +such harmonised thought. + +Some thoughts arise directly from sense-presentation, and are part of +the state of consciousness which is perception. Such a thought is, "An +object of redness is there." But in general the thought is not verbal, +but is a direct apprehension of qualities and relations within the +content of consciousness. + +Amid such thoughts there can be no lack of harmony. For direct +apprehension is in its essence unique, and it is impossible to +apprehend an object as both red and blue. Subsequently it may be judged +that if other elements of the consciousness had been different, the +apprehension would have been of a blue object. Then--under certain +circumstances--the original apprehension will be called an error. But +for all that the fact remains, there was an apprehension of a red +object. + +When we speak of sense-presentation, we mean these primary thoughts +essentially involved in its perception. But there are thoughts about +thoughts, and thoughts derived from other thoughts. These are secondary +thoughts. At this point it is well explicitly to discriminate between +an actual thought-expression, namely, a judgment actually made, and a +mere proposition which is a hypothetical thought-expression, namely, +an imagined possibility of thought-expression. Note that the actual +complete thought-content of the consciousness is explicitly neither +affirmed or denied. It is just what _is_ thought. Thus, to think +"two and two make four" is distinct from affirming that two and two +make four. In the first case the proposition is the thought-expression, +in the second case the affirmation of the proposition is the +thought-expression, and the proposition has been degraded to a mere +proposition, namely, to a hypothetical thought-expression which is +reflected upon. + +A distinction is sometimes made between facts and thoughts. So far as +physical science is concerned, the facts are thoughts, and thoughts +are facts. Namely, the facts of sense-presentation as they affect +science are those elements in the immediate apprehensions which are +thoughts. Also, actual thought-expressions, primary or secondary, are +the material facts which science interprets. + +The distinction that facts are given, but thoughts are free, is +not absolute. We can select and modify our sense-presentation, so +that facts--in the narrower sense of immediate apprehension of +sense-presentation--are to some degree subject to volition. Again, our +stream of thought-expression is only partially modified by explicit +volition. We can choose our physical experience, and we find ourselves +thinking; namely, on the one hand there is selection amid the dominant +necessity of sense, and on the other hand, the thought-content of +consciousness (so far as secondary thoughts are concerned) is not +wholly constituted by the selection of will. + +Thus, on the whole there is a large primary region of secondary +thought, as well as of the primary thoughts of sense-presentation, +which is given in type. That is the way in which we do think of things, +not wholly from any abstract necessity, so far as we know, but because +we have inherited the method from an environment. It is the way we find +ourselves thinking, a way which can only be fundamentally laid aside by +an immense effort, and then only for isolated short periods of time. +This is what I have called the "whole apparatus of commonsense thought." + +It is this body of thought which is assumed in science. It is a way +of thinking rather than a set of axioms. It is, in fact, the set of +concepts which commonsense has found useful in sorting out human +experience. It is modified in detail, but assumed in gross. The +explanations of science are directed to finding conceptions and +propositions concerning nature which explain the importance of these +common sense notions. For example, a chair is a common sense notion, +molecules and electrons explain our vision of chairs. + +Now science aims at harmonising our reflective and derivative thoughts +with the primary thoughts involved in the immediate apprehension of +sense-presentation. It also aims at producing such derivative thoughts, +logically knit together. This is scientific theory; and the harmony to +be achieved is the agreement of theory with observation, which is the +apprehension of sense-presentation. + +Thus there is a twofold scientific aim: (1) the production of theory +which agrees with experience; and (2) the explanation of commonsense +concepts of nature, at least in their main outlines. This explanation +consists in the preservation of the concepts in a scientific theory of +harmonised thought. + +It is not asserted that this is what scientists in the past meant to +achieve, or thought that they could achieve. It is suggested as the +actual result of scientific effort, so far as that effort has had +any measure of success. In short, we are here discussing the natural +history of ideas and not volitions of scientists. + + + _II. Objects_ + +We perceive things in space. For example, among such things are dogs, +chairs, curtains, drops of water, gusts of air, flames, rainbows, +chimes of bells, odours, aches and pains. There is a scientific +explanation of the origin of these perceptions. This explanation +is given in terms of molecules, atoms, electrons, and their mutual +relations, in particular of their space-relations, and waves of +disturbance of these space-relations which are propagated through +space. The primary elements of the scientific explanation--molecules, +etc.--are not the things directly perceived. For example, we do not +perceive a wave of light; the sensation of sight is the resultant +effect of the impact of millions of such waves through a stretch of +time. Thus the object directly perceived corresponds to a series of +events in the physical world, events which are prolonged through +a stretch of time. Nor is it true that a perceived object always +corresponds to the same group of molecules. After a few years we +recognise the same cat, but we are thereby related to different +molecules. + +Again, neglecting for a moment the scientific explanation, the +perceived object is largely the supposition of our imagination. When +we recognised the cat, we also recognised that it was glad to see +us. But we merely heard its mewing, saw it arch its back, and felt it +rubbing itself against us. We must distinguish, therefore, between the +many direct objects of sense, and the single indirect object of thought +which is the cat. + +Thus, when we say that we perceived the cat and understood its +feelings, we mean that we heard a sense-object of sound, that we saw a +sense-object of sight, that we felt a sense-object of touch, and that +we thought of a cat and imagined its feelings. + +Sense-objects are correlated by time-relations and space-relations. +Three simultaneous sense-objects which are also spatially coincident, +are combined by thought into the perception of one cat. Such +combination of sense-objects is an instinctive immediate judgment in +general without effort of reasoning. Sometimes only one sense-object +is present. For example, we hear mewing and say there must be a cat +in the room. The transition from the sense-object to the cat has +then been made, by deliberate ratiocination. Even the concurrence of +sense-objects may provoke such a self-conscious effort. For example, in +the dark we feel something, and hear mewing from the same place, and +think, Surely this is a cat. Sight is more bold; when we see a cat, we +do not think further. We identify the sight with the cat, whereas the +cat and the mew are separate. But such immediate identification of +a sight object and an object of thought may lead to error; the birds +pecked at the grapes of Apelles. + +A single sense-object is a complex entity. The sight-object of a +tile on the hearth may remain unchanged as we watch it in a steady +light, remaining ourselves unchanged in position. Even then it is +prolonged in time, and has parts in space. Also it is somewhat +arbitrarily distinguished from a larger whole of which it forms part. +But the glancing fire-light and a change in our position alters the +sight-object. We judge that the tile thought-object remains unchanged. +The sight-object of the coal on the fire gradually modifies, though +within short intervals it remains unchanged. We judge that the coal +thought-object is changing. The flame is never the same, and its shape +is only vaguely distinguishable. + +We conclude that a single self-identical sight-object is already a +phantasy of thought. Consider the unchanging sight-object of the tile, +as we remain still in a steady light. Now a sense-object perceived at +one time is a distinct object from a sense-object seen at another time. +Thus the sight of the tile at noon is distinct from its sight at 12.30. +But there is no such thing as a sense-object at an instant. As we stare +at the tile, a minute, or a second, or a tenth of a second, has flown +by: essentially there is a duration. There is a stream of sight, and +we can distinguish its parts. But the parts also are streams, and +it is only in thought that the stream separates into a succession of +elements. The stream may be "steady" as in the case of the unchanging +sight-tile, or may be "turbulent" as in the case of the glancing +sight-flame. In either case a sight-object is some arbitrarily small +part of the stream. + +Again, the stream which forms the succession of sight-tiles is merely a +distinguishable part of the whole stream of sight-presentation. + +So, finally, we conceive ourselves each experiencing a complete +time-flux (or stream) of sense-presentation. This stream is +distinguishable into parts. The grounds of distinction are differences +of sense--including within that term, differences of types of sense, +and differences of quality and of intensity within the same type +of sense--and differences of time-relations, and differences of +space-relations. Also the parts are not mutually exclusive and exist in +unbounded variety. + +The time-relation between the parts raises the questions of memory and +recognition, subjects too complex for discussion here. One remark must +be made. If it be admitted, as stated above, that we live in durations +and not in instants, namely, that the present essentially occupies +a stretch of time, the distinction between memory and immediate +presentation cannot be quite fundamental; for always we have with us +the fading present as it becomes the immediate past. This region of our +consciousness is neither pure memory nor pure immediate presentation. +Anyhow, memory is also a presentation in consciousness. + +Another point is to be noted in connection with memory. There is no +directly perceived time-relation between a present event and a past +event. The present event is only related to the memory of the past +event. But the memory of a past event is itself a present element +in consciousness. We assert the principle that directly perceived +relations can only exist between elements of consciousness, both in +that present during which the perception occurs. All other relations +between elements of perception are inferential constructions. It thus +becomes necessary to explain how the time stream of events establishes +itself in thought, and how the apparent world fails to collapse into +one single present. The solution of the difficulty is arrived at +by observing that the present is itself a duration, and therefore +includes directly perceived time-relations between events contained +within it. In other words we put the present on the same footing as +the past and the future in respect to the inclusion within it of +antecedent and succeeding events, so that past, present, and future +are in this respect exactly analogous ideas. Thus there will be two +events _a_ and _b_, both in the same present, but the event +_a_ will be directly perceived to precede the event _b_. +Again time flows on, and the event _a_ fades into the past, and +in the new present duration events _b_ and _c_ occur, event +_b_ preceding event _c_, also in the same present duration +there is the memory of the time-relation between _a_ and _b_. +Then by an inferential construction the event _a_ in the past +precedes the event _c_ in the present. By proceeding according to +this principle the time-relations between elements of consciousness, +not in the same present, are established. The method of procedure +here explained is a first example of what we will call the Principle +of Aggregation. This is one of the fundamental principles of mental +construction according to which our conception of the external physical +world is constructed. Other examples will later on be met with. + +The space-relations between the parts are confused and fluctuating, +and in general lack determinate precision. The master-key by which +we confine our attention to such parts as possess mutual relations +sufficiently simple for our intellects to consider is the principle of +convergence to simplicity with diminution of extent. We will call it +the "principle of convergence." This principle extends throughout the +whole field of sense-presentation. + +The first application of the principle occurs in respect to time. +The shorter the stretch of time, the simpler are the aspects of the +sense-presentation contained within it. The perplexing effects of +change are diminished and in many cases can be neglected. Nature has +restricted the acts of thought which endeavour to realise the content +of the present, to stretches of time sufficiently short to secure this +static simplicity over the greater part of the sense-stream. + +Spatial relations become simplified within the approximately static +sense-world of the short time. A further simplicity is gained by +partitioning this static world into parts of restricted space-content. +The various parts thus obtained have simpler mutual space-relations, +and again the principle of convergence holds. + +Finally, the last simplicity is obtained by partitioning the +parts, already restricted as to space and time, into further parts +characterised by homogeneity in type of sense, and homogeneity in +quality and intensity of sense. These three processes of restriction +yield, finally, the sense-objects which have been mentioned above. Thus +the sense-object is the result of an active process of discrimination +made in virtue of the principle of convergence. It is the result of +the quest for simplicity of relations within the complete stream of +sense-presentation. + +The thought-objects of perception are instances of a fundamental +law of nature, the law of objective stability. It is the law of the +coherence of sense-objects. This law of stability has an application +to time and an application to space; also it must be applied in +conjunction with that other law, the principle of convergence to +simplicity from which sense-objects are derived. + +Some composite partial streams of sense-presentation can be +distinguished with the following characteristics: (1) the +time-succession of sense-objects, belonging to a single sense, involved +in any such a composite partial stream, is composed of very similar +objects whose modifications increase only gradually, and thus forms +a homogeneous component stream within the composite stream; (2) the +space-relations of those sense-objects (of various senses) of such +a composite stream which are confined within any sufficiently short +time are identical so far as they are definitely apprehended, and thus +these various component streams, each homogeneous, "cohere" to form the +whole composite partial stream; (3) there are other sense-presentations +occurring in association with that composite partial stream which +can be determined by rules derived from analogous composite partial +streams, with other space and time relations, provided that the analogy +be sufficiently close. Call these the "associated sense-presentations." +A partial stream of this sort, viewed as a whole, is here called a +"first crude thought-object of perception." + +For example, we look at an orange for half a minute, handle it, and +smell it, note its position in the fruit-basket, and then turn away. +The stream of sense-presentation of the orange during that half-minute +is a first crude thought-object of perception. Among the associated +sense presentations are those of the fruit-basket which we conceive as +supporting the orange. + +The essential ground of the association of sense-objects of +various types, perceived within one short duration, into a first +crude thought-object of perception is the coincidence of their +space-relations, that is, in general an approximate coincidence of +such relations perhaps only vaguely apprehended. Thus coincident +space-relations associate sense-objects into a first crude +thought-object, and diverse space-relations dissociate sense-objects +from aggregation into a first crude thought-object. In respect to +some groups of sense-objects the association may be an immediate +judgment devoid of all inference, so that the primary perceptual +thought is that of the first crude thought-object, and the separate +sense-objects are the result of reflective analysis acting on memory. +For example sense-objects of sight and sense-objects of touch are +often thus primarily associated and only secondarily dissociated in +thought. But sometimes the association is wavering and indeterminate, +for example, that between the sound-object of the mew of the cat and +the sight-object of the cat. Thus to sum up, the partial stream of +sense-perceptions coalesces into that first crude thought-object of +perception which is the momentary cat because the sense-perceptions +belonging to this stream are in the same place, but equally it would +be true to say that they are in the same place because they belong +to the same momentary cat. This analysis of the complete stream of +sense-presentation in any small present duration into a variety of +first crude thought-objects only partially fits the facts; for one +reason because many sense-objects, such as sound for instance, have +vague and indeterminate space-relations, for example vaguely those +space-relations which we associate with our organs of sense and also +vaguely those of the origin from which (in the scientific explanation) +they proceed. + +The procedure by which the orange of half a minute is elaborated into +the orange in the ordinary sense of the term involves in addition the +two principles of aggregation and of hypothetical sense-presentation. + +The principle of aggregation, as here employed, takes the form that +many distinct first crude thought-objects of perception are conceived +as one thought-object of perception, if the many partial streams +forming these objects are sufficiently analogous, if their times of +occurrence are distinct, and if the associated sense-presentations are +sufficiently analogous. + +For example, after leaving the orange, in five minutes we return. +A new first crude thought-object of perception presents itself to +us, indistinguishable from the half-minute orange we previously +experienced; it is in the same fruit-basket. We aggregate the two +presentations of an orange into the same orange. By such aggregations +we obtain "second crude thought-objects of perception." But however far +we can proceed with aggregation of this type, the orange is more than +that. For example, what do we mean when we say, The orange is in the +cupboard, if Tom has not eaten it? + +The world of present fact is more than a stream of sense-presentation. +We find ourselves with emotions, volitions, imaginations, conceptions, +and judgments. No factor which enters into consciousness is by itself +or even can exist in isolation. We are analysing certain relations +between sense-presentation and other factors of consciousness. +Hitherto we have taken into account merely the factors of concept and +judgment. Imagination is necessary to complete the orange, namely, +the imagination of hypothetical sense-presentations. It is beside +the point to argue whether we ought to have such imaginations, or to +discuss what are the metaphysical truths concerning reality to which +they correspond. We are here only concerned with the fact that such +imaginations exist and essentially enter into the formation of the +concepts of the thought-objects of perception which are the first +data of science. We conceive the orange as a permanent collection of +sense-presentations existing as if they were an actual element in our +consciousness, which they are not. The orange is thus conceived as +in the cupboard with its shape, odour, colour, and other qualities. +Namely, we imagine hypothetical possibilities of sense-presentation, +and conceive their want of actuality in our consciousness as immaterial +to their existence in fact. The fact which is essential for science is +our conception; its meaning in regard to the metaphysics of reality is +of no scientific importance, so far as physical science is concerned. + +The orange completed in this way is the thought-object of perception. + +It must be remembered that the judgments and concepts arising in the +formation of thought-objects of perception are in the main instinctive +judgments, and instinctive concepts, and are not concepts and judgments +consciously sought for and consciously criticised before adoption. +Their adoption is facilitated by and interwoven with the expectation of +the future in which the hypothetical passes into the actual, and also +with the further judgment of the existence of other consciousnesses, +so that much that is hypothetical to one consciousness is judged to be +actual to others. + +The thought-object of perception is, in fact, a device to make plain +to our reflective consciousness relations which hold within the +complete stream of sense-presentation. Concerning the utility of this +weapon there can be no question; it is the rock upon which the whole +structure of commonsense thought is erected. But when we consider the +limits of its application the evidence is confused. A great part of our +sense-presentation can be construed as perception of various persistent +thought-objects. But hardly at any time can the sense-presentations +be construed wholly in that way. Sights lend themselves easily to +this construction, but sight can be baffled: for example, consider +reflections in looking-glasses, apparently bent sticks half in and half +out of water, rainbows, brilliant patches of light which conceal the +object from which they emanate, and many analogous phenomena. Sound +is more difficult; it tends largely to disengage itself from any such +object. For example, we see the bell, but we hear the sound which +comes from the bell; yet we also say that we hear the bell. Again, a +toothache is largely by itself, and is only indirectly a perception +of the nerve of the tooth. Illustrations to the same effect can be +accumulated from every type of sensation. + +Another difficulty arises from the fact of change. The thought-object +is conceived as one thing, wholly actual at each instant. But since +the meat has been bought it has been cooked, the grass grows and then +withers, the coal burns in the fire, the pyramids of Egypt remain +unchanged for ages, but even the pyramids are not wholly unchanged. The +difficulty of change is merely evaded by affixing a technical Latin +name to a supposed logical fallacy. A slight cooking leaves the meat +the same object, but two days in the oven burns it to a cinder. When +does the meat cease to be? Now the chief use of the thought-object +is the concept of it as one thing, here and now, which later can be +recognised, there and then. This concept applies sufficiently well to +most things for short times, and to many things for long times. But +sense-presentation as a whole entirely refuses to be patient of the +concept. + +We have now come to the reflective region of explanation, which is +science. + +A great part of the difficulty is at once removed by applying the +principle of convergence to simplicity. We habitually make our +thought-objects too large; we should think in smaller parts. For +example, the Sphinx has changed by its nose becoming chipped, but by +proper inquiry we could find the missing part in some private house +of Western Europe or Northern America. Thus, either part, the rest +of the Sphinx or the chip, regains its permanence. Furthermore, we +enlarge this explanation by conceiving parts so small that they can +only be observed under the most favourable circumstances. This is a +wide extension of the principle of convergence in its application to +nature; but it is a principle amply supported by the history of exact +observation. + +Thus, change in thought-objects of perception is largely explained as +a disintegration into smaller parts, themselves thought-objects of +perception. The thought-objects of perception which are presupposed in +the common thought of civilised beings are almost wholly hypothetical. +The material universe is largely a concept of the imagination which +rests on a slender basis of direct sense-presentation. But none the +less it is a fact; for it is a fact that actually we imagine it. Thus +it is actual in our consciousness just as sense-presentation also is +actual there. The effort of reflective criticism is to make these two +factors in our consciousness agree where they are related, namely, +to construe our sense-presentation as actual realisation of the +hypothetical thought-objects of perception. + +The wholesale employment of purely hypothetical thought-objects of +perception enables science to explain some of the stray sense-objects +which cannot be construed as perceptions of a thought-object of +perception: for example, sounds. But the phenomena as a whole defy +explanation on these lines until a further fundamental step is taken, +which transforms the whole concept of the material universe. Namely, +the thought-object of perception is superseded by the thought-object of +science. + +The thought-objects of science are molecules, atoms, and electrons. The +peculiarity of these objects is that they have shed all the qualities +which are capable of direct sense-representation in consciousness. +They are known to us only by their associated phenomena, namely, +series of events in which they are implicated are represented in our +consciousness by sense-presentations. In this way, the thought-objects +of science are conceived as the causes of sense-representation. The +transition from thought-objects of perception to thought-objects of +science is decently veiled by an elaborate theory concerning primary +and secondary qualities of bodies. + +This device, by which sense-presentations are represented in thought +as our perception of events in which thought-objects of science are +implicated, is the fundamental means by which a bridge is formed +between the fluid vagueness of sense and the exact definition of +thought. In thought a proposition is either true or false, an entity +is exactly what it is, and relations between entities are expressible +(in idea) by definite propositions about distinctly conceived entities. +Sense-perception knows none of these things, except by courtesy. +Accuracy essentially collapses at some stage of inquiry. + + + _III. Time and Space_ + +_Recapitulation._--Relations of time and relations of space +hold between sense-objects of perception. These sense-objects are +distinguished as separate objects by the recognition of either (1) +differences of sense-content, or (2) time-relations between them +other than simultaneity, or (3) space-relations between them other +than coincidence. Thus sense-objects arise from the recognition of +contrast within the complete stream of sense-presentation, namely, from +the recognition of the objects as related terms, by relations which +contrast them. Differences of sense-content are infinitely complex in +their variety. Their analysis under the heading of general ideas is the +unending task of physical science. Time-relations and space-relations +are comparatively simple, and the general ideas according to which +their analysis should proceed are obvious. + +This simplicity of time and space is perhaps the reason why thought +chooses them as the permanent ground for objectival distinction, +throwing the various sense-objects thus obtainable into one heap, as +a first crude thought-object of perception, and thence, as described +above, obtaining a thought-object of perception. Thus a thought-object +of perception conceived as in the present of a short duration is a +first crude thought-object of perception either actual or hypothetical. +Such a thought-object of perception, confined within a short duration, +takes on the space-relations of its component sense-objects within that +same duration. Accordingly thought-objects of perception, conceived in +their whole extents, have to each other the time-relationships of their +complete existences, and within any small duration have to each other +the space-relationships of their component sense-objects which lie +within that duration. + +Relations bind together: thus thought-objects of perception are +connected in time and in space. The genesis of the objectival analysis +of sense-presentation is the recognition of sense-objects as distinct +terms in time-relations and space-relations: thus thought-objects of +perception are separated by time and by space. + +_Whole and Part._--A sense-object is part of the complete stream +of presentation. This concept of being a part is merely the statement +of the relation of the sense-object to the complete sense-presentation +for that consciousness. Also a sense-object can be part of another +sense-object. It can be a part in two ways, namely, a part in time +and a part in space. It seems probable that both these concepts of +time-part and space-part are fundamental; that is, are concepts +expressing relations which are directly presented to us, and are not +concepts about concepts. In that case no further definition of the +actual presentation is possible. It may even then be possible to +define an adequate criterion of the occurrence of such a presentation. +For example, adopting for the moment a realist metaphysic as to the +existence of the physical world of molecules and electrons, the vision +of a chair as occurring for some definite person at some definite +time is essentially indefinable. It is his vision, though each of us +guesses that it must be uncommonly like our vision under analogous +circumstances. But the existence of the definable molecules and +waves of light in certain definable relations to his bodily organs +of sense, his body also being in a certain definable state, forms an +adequate criterion of the occurrence of the vision, a criterion which +is accepted in Courts of Law and for physical science is tacitly +substituted for the vision. + +The connection between the relations "whole and part" and "all and +some" is intimate. It can be explained thus so far as concerns directly +presented sense-objects. Call two sense-objects "separated" if there +is no third sense-object which is a part of both of them. Then an +object A is composed of the two objects B and C, if (1) B and C are +both parts of A, (2) B and C are separated, and (3) there is no part of +A which is separated both from B and from C. In such a case the class +α which is composed of the two objects B and C is often substituted +in thought for the sense-object A. But this process presupposes the +fundamental relation "whole and part." Conversely the objects B and C +may be actual sense-objects, but the sense-object A which corresponds +to the class α may remain hypothetical. For example, the round world +on which we live remains a conception corresponding to no single +sense-object at any time presented in any human being's consciousness. + +It is possible, however, that some mode of conceiving the +whole-and-part relation between extended objects as the all-and-some +relation of logical classes can be found. But in this case the +extended objects as here conceived cannot be the true sense-objects +which are present to consciousness. For as here conceived a part of a +sense-object is another sense-object of the same type; and therefore +one sense-object cannot be a class of other sense-objects, just as +a tea-spoon cannot be a class of other tea-spoons. The ordinary way +in thought by which whole-and-part is reduced to all-and-some is by +the device of points, namely, the part of an object occupies some +of the points occupied by the whole object. If any one holds that +in his consciousness the sense-presentation is a presentation of +point-objects, and that an extended object is merely a class of such +point-objects collected together in thought, then this ordinary method +is completely satisfactory. We shall proceed on the assumption that +this conception of directly perceived point-objects has no relation to +the facts. + +In the preceding address on "The Organisation of Thought," another mode +is suggested. But this method would apply only to the thought-object +of perception, and has no reference to the primary sense-objects here +considered. Accordingly it must reckon as a subordinate device for a +later stage of thought. + +Thus the point-object in time and the point-object in space, and the +double point-object both in time and space, must be conceived as +intellectual constructions. The fundamental fact is the sense-object, +extended both in time and space, with the fundamental relation of +whole-to-part to other such objects, and subject to the law of +convergence to simplicity as we proceed in thought through a series of +successively contained parts. + +The relation whole-to-part is a temporal or spatial relation, and +is therefore primarily a relation holding between sense-objects of +perception, and it is only derivatively ascribed to the thought-objects +of perception of which they are components. More generally, space and +time relations hold primarily between sense-objects of perception and +derivatively between thought-objects of perception. + +_Definition of Points._--The genesis of points of time and of +space can now be studied. We must distinguish (1) sense-time and +sense-space, and (2) thought-time of perception and thought-space of +perception. + +Sense-time and sense-space are the actually observed time-relations +and space-relations between sense-objects. Sense-time and sense-space +have no points except, perhaps, a few sparse instances, sufficient +to suggest the logical idea; also, sense-time and sense-space are +discontinuous and fragmentary. + +Thought-time of perception and thought-space of perception are the time +and space relations which hold between thought-objects of perception. +Thought-time of perception and thought-space of perception are each +continuous. By "continuous" is here meant that all thought-objects of +perception have to each other a time (or space) relation. + +The origin of points is the effort to take full advantage of +the principle of convergence to simplicity. In so far as this +principle does not apply, a point is merely a cumbrous way of +directing attention to a set of relations between a certain set of +thought-objects of perception, which set of relations, though actual so +far as a thought-object is actual, is (under this supposition) of no +particular importance. Thus the proved importance in physical science +of the concepts of points in time and points in space is a tribute to +the wide applicability of this principle of convergence. + +Euclid defines a point as without parts and without magnitude. In +modern language a point is often described as an ideal limit by +indefinitely continuing the process of diminishing a volume (or +area). Points as thus conceived are often called convenient fictions. +This language is ambiguous. What is meant by a fiction? If it means +a conception which does not correspond to any fact, there is some +difficulty in understanding how it can be of any use in physical +science. For example, the fiction of a red man in a green coat +inhabiting the moon can never be of the slightest scientific service, +simply because--as we may presume--it corresponds to no fact. By +calling the concept of points a convenient fiction, it must be meant +that the concept does correspond to some important facts. It is, then, +requisite, in the place of such vague allusiveness, to explain exactly +what are the facts to which the concept corresponds. + +We are not much helped by explaining that a point is an ideal limit. +What is a limit? The idea of a limit has a precise meaning in the +theory of series, and in the theory of the values of functions; but +neither of these meanings apply here. It may be observed that, before +the ordinary mathematical meanings of limit had received a precise +explanation, the idea of a point as a limit might be considered as +one among other examples of an idea only to be apprehended by direct +intuition. This view is not now open to us. Thus, again, we are +confronted with the question: What are the precise properties meant +when a point is described as an ideal limit? The discussion which now +follows is an attempt to express the concept of a point in terms of +thought-objects of perception related together by the whole-and-part +relation, considered either as a time-relation or as a space-relation. +If it is so preferred, it may be considered that the discussion is +directed towards a precise elucidation of the term "ideal limit" as +often used in this connection. + +The subsequent explanations can be made easier to follow by a small +piece of symbolism: Let _aEb_ mean that "_b_ is part of _a_." We need +not decide whether we are talking of time-parts or space-parts, but +whichever choice is supposed to be made must be conceived as adhered to +throughout any connected discussion. The symbol _E_ may be considered +as the initial letter of "encloses," so we read "_aEb_" as "_a_ +encloses _b_." Again the "field of _E_" is the set of things which +either enclose or are enclosed, _i. e._ everything "_a_," which is such +that _x_ can be found so that either _aEx_ or _xEa_. A member of the +field of _E_ is called "an enclosure-object." + +Now, we assume that this relation of whole-to-part, which in the future +we will call "enclosure," always satisfies the conditions in that the +relation _E_ is (1) transitive, (2) asymmetrical, and (3) with its +domain including its converse domain. + +These four conditions deserve some slight consideration; only the first +two of them embody hypotheses which enter vitally into the reasoning. + +Condition (1) may be stated as the condition that _aEb_ and _bEc_ +always implies _aEc_. The fact that an entity _b_ can be found such +that _aEb_ and _bEc_ may be conceived as a relation between _a_ and +_c_. It is natural to write _E_^2 for this relation. Thus the condition +is now written: If _aE_^2_c_, then _aEc_. This can be still otherwise +expressed by saying that the relation _E_^2 implies, whenever it holds, +that the relation _E_ also holds. + +Condition (2) is partly a mere question of trivial definition, and +partly a substantial assumption. The asymmetrical relation (_E_) is +such that _aEb_ and _bEa_ can never hold simultaneously. This property +splits up into two parts: (1) that no instance of _aEb_ and _bEa_ and +"_a_ diverse from _b_," can occur, and (2) that _aEa_ cannot occur. +The first part is a substantial assumption, the second part (so far as +we are concerned) reduces to the trivial convention that we shall not +consider an object as part of itself, but will confine attention to +"proper parts." + +Condition (3) means that _aEb_ always implies that _c_ can be +found such that _bEc_. This condition, taken in conjunction with +the fact that we are only considering proper parts, is the assertion of +the principle of the indefinite divisibility of extended objects, both +in space and in time. + +An indivisible part will lack duration in time, and extension in +space, and is thus an entity of essentially a different character +to a divisible part. If we admit such indivisibles as the only true +sense-objects, our subsequent procedure is an unnecessary elaboration. + +It will be found that a fourth condition is necessary owing to +logical difficulties connected with the theory of an infinite number +of choices. It will not be necessary for us to enter further on +this question, which involves difficult considerations of abstract +logic. The outcome is, that apart from hypothesis we cannot prove the +existence of the sets, each containing an infinite number of objects, +which are here called points, as will be explained immediately. + +Now consider a set of enclosure objects which is such that (1) +of any two of its members one encloses the other, and (2) there +is no member which is enclosed by all the others, and (3) there +is no enclosure-object, not a member of the set which is enclosed +by every member of the set. Call such a set a "convergent set of +enclosure-objects." As we pass along the series from larger to smaller +members, evidently we converge towards an ideal simplicity to any +degree of approximation to which we like to proceed, and the series as +a whole embodies the complete ideal along that route of approximation. +In fact, to repeat, the series is a _route of approximation_. + +We have now to inquire if the principle of convergence to simplicity +may be expected to yield the same type of simplicity for every such +convergent route. The answer is, as we might expect, namely, that this +depends upon the nature of the properties which are to be simplified. + +For example, consider the application to time. Now, time is +one-dimensional; so when this property of one-dimensionality has been +expressed by the proper conditions, not here stated, a convergent set +of enclosure-objects must, considered as a route of approximation, +exhibit the properties of one unique instant of time, as ordinarily +conceived by the euclidean definition. Accordingly, whatever simplicity +is to be achieved by the application to time of the principle of +convergence to simplicity must be exhibited among the properties of +any such route of approximation. + +For space, different considerations arise. Owing to its multiple +dimensions, we can show that different convergent sets of +enclosure-objects, indicating different routes of approximation, may +exhibit convergence to different types of simplicity, some more complex +than others. + +For example, consider a rectangular box of height _h_ ft., breadth +_b_ ft., and thickness _c_ ft. Now, keep _h_ and _b_ constant, and +let the central plane (height _h_, breadth _b_) perpendicular to the +thickness be fixed, then make _c_ diminish indefinitely. We thus obtain +a convergent series of an indefinitely large number of boxes, and there +is no smallest box. Thus this convergent series exhibits the route of +approximation towards the type of simplicity expressed as being a plane +area of height _h_, breadth _b_, and no thickness. + +Again, by keeping the central line of height _h_ fixed, and by making +_b_ and _c_ diminish indefinitely, the series converges to the segment +of a straight line of length _h_. + +Finally, by keeping only the central point fixed, and by making _h_, +_b_, and _c_ diminish indefinitely, the series converges to a point. + +Furthermore, we have introduced as yet no concept which would prevent +an enclosure-object being formed of detached fragments in space. Thus +we can easily imagine a convergent set which converges to a number of +points in space. For example, each object of the set might be formed of +two not overlapping spheres of radius _r_, with centres _A_ and _B_. +Then by diminishing _r_ indefinitely, and keeping _A_ and _B_ fixed, we +have convergence to the pair of points _A_ and _B_. + +It remains now to consider how those convergent sets which converge to +a single point can be discriminated from all the other types of such +sets, merely by utilising concepts founded on the relation of enclosure. + +Let us name convergent sets by Greek letters; by proceeding "forward" +along any such set let us understand the process of continually passing +from the larger to the smaller enclosure-objects which form the set. + +The convergent set α will be said to "cover" the convergent set β, if +every member of α encloses some members of β. We notice that if an +enclosure-object _x_ encloses any member (_y_) of β, then every member +of the "tail-end" of β, found by proceeding forward along β from _y_, +must be enclosed by _x_. Thus if α covers β, every member of α encloses +every member of the tail-end of β, starting from the largest member of +β which is enclosed by that member of α. + +It is possible for each of two convergent sets to cover the other. For +example, let one set (α) be a set of concentric spheres converging to +their centre _A_, and the other set (β) be a set of concentric +cubes, similarly situated, converging to the same centre _A_. Then +α and β will each cover the other. + +Let two convergent sets which are such that each covers the other be +called "equal." + +Then it is a sufficient condition to secure that a convergent set +α possesses the point type of convergence, if every convergent set +covered by it is also equal to it, namely, α is a convergent set with +the punctual type of convergence, if "α covers β" always implies that β +covers α. + +It can easily be seen by simple examples that the other types of +convergence to surfaces or lines or sets of points cannot possess this +property. Consider, for example, the three convergent sets of boxes in +the preceding illustration, which converge respectively to a central +plane, a central line in the central plane, and the central point in +the central line. The first set covers the second and third sets, and +the second set covers the third set, but no two of the sets are equal. + +It is a more difficult question to determine whether the condition here +indicated as sufficient to secure the punctual type of convergence +is also necessary. The question turns on how far thought-objects +of perception possess exact boundaries prior to the elaboration of +exact mathematical concepts of space. If they are to be conceived as +possessing such exact boundaries, then convergent sets converging to +points on such boundaries must be allowed for. The procedure necessary +for the specification of the complete punctual condition becomes then +very elaborate,[3] and will not be considered here. + +But such exact determination as is involved in the conception of +an exact spatial boundary does not seem to belong to the true +thought-object of perception. The ascription of an exact boundary +really belongs to the transition stage of thought as it passes from +the thought-object of perception to the thought-object of science. +The transition from the sense-object immediately presented to the +thought-object of perception is historically made in a wavering +indeterminate line of thought. The definite stages here marked out +simply serve to prove that a logically explicable transition is +possible. + +We accordingly assume that the condition laid down above to secure the +punctual convergence of a convergent set of enclosure-objects is not +only sufficient, but necessary. + +It can be proved that, if two convergent sets of enclosure-objects are +both equal to a third convergent set, they are equal to each other. +Consider now any punctual convergent set (α). We want to define the +"point" to which α is a route of approximation in a way which is +neutral between α and all the convergent sets which are equal to α. +Each of these sets is a route of approximation to the same "point" +as α. This definition is secured if we define the point as the class +formed by all the enclosure-objects which belong either to α or to +any convergent set which is equal to α. Let _P_ be this class +of enclosure-objects. Then any convergent set (β) which consists of +enclosure-objects entirely selected from members of the class _P_ +must be a route of approximation to the same "point" as does the +original punctual set α; namely, provided that we choose a small enough +enclosure-object in β, we can always find a member of α which encloses +it; and provided that we choose a small enough enclosure-object in +α, we can always find a member of β which encloses it. Thus _P_ +only includes convergent sets of the punctual type, and the route +of approximation indicated by any two convergent sets selected from +_P_ converges to identical results. + +_The Uses of Points._--The sole use of points is to facilitate the +employment of the principle of Convergence to Simplicity. By this +principle some simple relations in appropriate circumstances become +true, when objects are considered which are sufficiently restricted in +time or in space. The introduction of points enables this principle to +be carried through to its ideal limit. For example, suppose _g_ (_a_, +_b_, _c_) represents some statement concerning three enclosure-objects, +_a_, _b_, _c_, which may be true if the objects are sufficiently +restricted in extent. Let _A_, _B_, _C_ be three given points, +then we define _g_ (_A_, _B_, _C_) to mean that _whatever_ three +enclosure-objects _a_, _b_, _c_ are chosen, such that _a_ is a member +of _A_, _b_ of _B_, and _c_ of _C_, it is _always possible_ to find +three other members of _A_, _B_, _C_, namely, _x_ a member of _A_, _y_ +of _B_, and _z_ of _C_, such that _aEx_, _bEy_, _cEz_, and _g_ (_x_, +_y_, _z_). So by going far enough down in the tail-ends of _A_, _B_, +_C_ we can always secure three objects _x_, _y_, _z_ for which _g_ +(_x_, _y_, _z_) is true. + +For example, let _g_ (_A_, _B_, _C_) mean "_A_, _B_, _C_ are three +points in a linear row." This must be construed to mean that whatever +three objects _a_, _b_, _c_ we choose, members of _A_, _B_, _C_ +respectively, we can always find three objects _x_, _y_, _z_, also +members of _A_, _B_, _C_ respectively, and such that _a_ encloses _x_, +_b_ encloses _y_, _c_ encloses _z_, and also such that _x_, _y_, _z_ +are in a linear row. + +Sometimes a double convergence is necessary, namely, a convergence of +conditions as well as a convergence of objects. For example, consider +the statement, "the points _A_ and _B_ are two feet apart." Now, the +exact statement "two feet apart" does not apply to objects. For objects +_x_ and _y_ we must substitute the statement, "the distance between +_x_ and _y_ lies between the limits (2 ± _e_) feet." Here _e_ is some +number, less than two, which we have chosen for this statement. Then +the points _A_ and _B_ are two feet apart; if, _however we choose the +number e_, whatever enclosure-objects _a_ and _b_, members of _A_ and +_B_ respectively, we consider, we can always find enclosure-objects _x_ +and _y_, members of _A_ and _B_ respectively, such that _a_ encloses +_x_ and _b_ encloses _y_, and also such that the distance between _x_ +and _y_ lies between the limits (2 ± _e_) feet. It is evident, since +_e_ can be chosen as small as we please, that this statement exactly +expresses the condition that _A_ and _B_ are two feet apart. + +_Straight Lines and Planes._--But the problem of the intellectual +construction of straight lines and planes is not yet sufficiently +analysed. We have interpreted the meaning of the statement that three +or more points are collinear, and can similarly see how to interpret +the meaning of the statement that four or more points are coplanar, +in either case deriving the exact geometrical statements from vaguer +statements respecting extended objects. + +This procedure only contemplates groups of finite numbers of points. +But straight lines and planes are conceived as containing infinite +numbers of points. This completion of lines and planes is obtained +by a renewed application of the principle of aggregation, just as +a set of first crude thought-objects of perception are aggregated +into one complete thought-object of perception. In this way repeated +judgments of the collinearity of sets of points are finally, when +certain conditions of interlacing are fulfilled, aggregated in the +single judgment of all the points of the groups as forming one whole +collinear group. Similarly for judgments of coplanarity. This process +of logical aggregation can be exhibited in its exact logical analysis. +But it is unnecessary here to proceed to such details. Thus we conceive +our points as sorted into planes and straight lines, concerning which +the various axioms of geometry hold. These axioms, in so far as they +essentially require the conception of points, are capable of being +exhibited as the outcome of vaguer, less exact judgments respecting the +relations of extended objects. + +_Empty Space._--It must be observed that the points, hitherto +defined, necessarily involve thought-objects of perception, and lie +within the space-extension occupied by such objects. It is true that +such objects are largely hypothetical, and that we can bring into our +hypotheses sufficient objects to complete our lines and planes. But +every such hypothesis weakens the connection between our scientific +concept of nature and the actual observed facts which are involved in +the actual sense-presentations. + +Occam's razor, _Entia non multiplicanda præter necessitatem_, +is not an arbitrary rule based on mere logical elegancy. Nor is its +application purely confined to metaphysical speculation. I am ignorant +of the precise reason for its metaphysical validity, but its scientific +validity is obvious, namely, every use of hypothetical entities +diminishes the claim of scientific reasoning to be the necessary +outcome of a harmony between thought and sense-presentation. As +hypothesis increases, necessity diminishes. + +Commonsense thought also supports this refusal to conceive of all +space as essentially depending on hypothetical objects which fill it. +We think of material objects as filling space, but we ask whether any +objects exist between the Earth and the Sun, between the stars, or +beyond the stars. For us, space is there; the only question is whether +or not it be full. But this form of question presupposes the meaning of +empty space, namely, of space not containing hypothetical objects. + +This brings up a wider use of the concept of points, necessitating +a wider definition. Hitherto we have conceived points as indicating +relations of enclosure between objects. We thus arrive at what now +we will term "material points." But the idea of points can now be +transformed so as to indicate the possibilities of external relations +not those of enclosure. This is effected by an enlargement of the +concept of ideal points, already known to geometers. + +Define "material lines" to be complete collinear classes of collinear +points. Consider now the set of material lines which contain a certain +material point. Call such a set of lines an ideal point. This set of +lines indicates a possibility of position, which is in fact occupied +by that material point common to all the material lines. So this ideal +point is an occupied ideal point. Now consider a set of three material +lines, such that any two are coplanar, but not the whole three, and +further consider the complete set of material lines such that each is +coplanar with each of the three material lines first chosen. The axioms +which hold for the material lines will enable us to prove that any two +lines of this set are coplanar. Then the whole set of lines, including +the three original lines, forms an ideal point, according to the +definition in its full generality. Such an ideal point may be occupied. +In that case there is a material point common to all the lines of the +set, but it may be unoccupied. Then the ideal point merely indicates +a possibility of spatial relations which has not been realised. It is +the point of empty space. Thus the ideal points, which may or may not +be occupied, are the points of geometry viewed as an applied science. +These points are distributed into straight lines and planes. But any +further discussion of this question will lead us into the technical +subject of the axioms of geometry and their immediate consequences. +Enough has been said to show how geometry arises according to the +relational theory of space. + +Space as thus conceived is the thought-space of the material world. + + + _IV. Fields of Force_ + +The thought-objects of science are conceived as directly related to +this thought-space. Their spatial relations are among those indicated +by the points of the thought-space. Their emergence in science has +been merely a further development of processes already inherent in +commonsense thought. + +Relations within the complete sense-presentation were represented +in thought by the concept of thought-objects of perception. All +sense-presentation could not be represented in this way; also the +change and disappearance of thought-objects occasioned confusion +of thought. A reduction to order of this confusion was attempted +by the concepts of permanent matter with primary and secondary +qualities. Finally, this has issued in the secondary qualities being +traced as perception of events generated by the objects, but--as +perceived--entirely disconnected with them. Also the thought-objects +of perception have been replaced by molecules and electrons and +ether-waves, until at length it is never the thought-object of science +which is perceived, but complicated series of events in which they are +implicated. If science be right, nobody ever perceived a thing, but +only an event. The result is, that the older language of philosophy +which still survives in many quarters is now thoroughly confusing +when brought into connection with the modern concepts of science. +Philosophy--that is, the older philosophy--conceives the thing as +directly perceived. According to scientific thought, the ultimate thing +is never perceived, perception essentially issuing from a series of +events. It is impossible to reconcile the two points of view. + +The advantage of the modern scientific concept is that it is enabled +to "explain" the fluid vague outlines of sense-presentation. The +thought-object of perception is now conceived as a fairly stable +state of motion of a huge group of molecules, constantly changing, +but preserving a certain identity of characteristics. Also stray +sense-objects, not immediately given as part of a thought-object of +perception, are now explicable: the dancing light-reflection, the +vaguely heard sound, the smell. In fact, the perceived events of +the scientific world have the same general definition and lack of +definition, and the same general stability and lack of stability, +as the sense-objects of the complete sense-presentation or as the +thought-objects of perception. + +The thought-objects of science, namely, molecules, atoms, and +electrons, have gained in permanence. The events are reduced to changes +in space-configuration. The laws determining these changes are the +ultimate laws of nature. + +The laws of change in the physical universe proceed on the assumption +that the preceding states of the universe determine the character of +the change. Thus, to know the configurations and events of the universe +up to and including any instant would involve sufficient data from +which to determine the succession of events throughout all time. + +But in tracing the antecedents of events, commonsense thought, dealing +with the world of thought-objects of perception, habitually assumes +that the greater number of antecedent events can be neglected as +irrelevant. Consideration of causes is restricted to a few events +during a short preceding interval. Finally, in scientific thought it +has been assumed that the events in an arbitrarily small preceding +duration are sufficient. Thus physical quantities and their successive +differential co-efficients up to any order at the instant, but with +their limiting values just before that instant, are on this theory +sufficient to determine the state of the universe at all times after +the instant. More particular laws are assumed. But the search for +them is guided by this general principle. Also it is assumed that the +greater number of events in the physical universe are irrelevant to +the production of any particular effect, which is assumed to issue +from relatively few antecedents. These assumptions have grown out of +the experience of mankind. The first lesson of life is to concentrate +attention on few factors of sense-presentations, and on still fewer of +the universe of thought-objects of perception. + +The principle by which--consciously or unconsciously--thought has been +guided is that in searching for particular causes, remoteness in time +and remoteness in space are evidences of comparative disconnection +of influence. The extreme form of this principle is the denial of +any action at a distance either in time or space. The difficulty in +accepting this principle in its crude form is, that since there are no +contiguous points, only coincident bodies can act on each other. I can +see no answer to this difficulty--namely, either bodies have the same +location and are thus coincident, or they have different locations and +are thus at a distance and do not act on each other. + +This difficulty is not evaded by the hypothesis of an ether, +continuously distributed. For two reasons: in the first place, the +continuity of the ether does not avoid the dilemma; and secondly, the +difficulty applies to time as well as to space, and the dilemma would +prove that causation producing change is impossible, namely, no changed +condition could be the result of antecedent circumstances. + +On the other hand, a direct interaction between two bodies separated +in space undoubtedly offends the conception of distance as implying +physical disconnection as well as spatial relation. There is no logical +difficulty in the assumption of action at a distance as in the case +of its denial, but it is contradictory to persistent assumptions of +that apparatus of commonsense thought which it is the main business +of science to harmonise with sense-presentation, employing only the +minimum of modification. + +Modern science is really unconcerned with this debate. Its +(unacknowledged) conceptions are really quite different, though the +verbal explanations retain the form of a previous epoch. The point of +the change in conception is that the old thought-object of science was +conceived as possessing a simplicity not belonging to the material +universe as a whole. It was secluded within a finite region of space, +and changes in its circumstances could only arise from forces which +formed no essential part of its nature. An ether was called into +existence to explain the active relations between these passive +thought-objects. The whole conception suffers from the logical +difficulties noted above. Also no clear conception can be formed of +the sense in which the ether is explanatory. It is to possess a type +of activity denied to the original thought-object, namely, it carries +potential energy, whereas the atom possessed only kinetic energy, +the so-called potential energy of an atom belonging really to the +surrounding ether. The truth is, that ether is really excepted from the +axiom "no action at a distance," and the axiom thereby is robbed of all +its force. + +The modern thought-object of science--not yet explicitly +acknowledged--has the complexity of the whole material universe. In +physics, as elsewhere, the hopeless endeavour to derive complexity +from simplicity has been tacitly abandoned. What is aimed at is not +simplicity, but persistence and regularity. In a sense regularity +is a sort of simplicity. But it is the simplicity of stable mutual +relations, and not the simplicity of absence of types of internal +structure or of type of relation. This thought-object fills all space. +It is a "field"; that is to say, it is a certain distribution of +scalar and vector quantities throughout space, these quantities having +each its value for each point of space at each point of time, being +continuously distributed throughout space and throughout time, possibly +with some exceptional discontinuities. The various types of quantity +which form the field have fixed relations to each other at each point +of time and space. These relations are the ultimate laws of nature. + +For example, consider an electron. There is a scalar distribution of +electricity, which is what is ordinarily called the electron. This +scalar distribution has a volume-density ρ at the time _t_ at any +point (_x_, _y_, _z_). Thus ρ is a function of (_x_, _y_, _z_, _t_), +which is zero except within a restricted region. Furthermore, at +any time _t_, as an essential adjunct, there is a continuous space +distribution at each point of the two vectors (_X_, _Y_, _Z_), which is +the electric force, and (α, β, γ), which is the magnetic force. Lastly, +individuality is ascribed to the scalar electric distribution, so that +in addition to its conservation of quantity--involved in the assumed +laws--it is also possible to assign the velocities with which the +various individual parts of the distribution are moving. Let (_u_, _v_, +_w_) be this velocity at (_x_, _y_, _z_, _t_). + +This whole scheme of scalar and vector quantities, namely, ρ, (_X_, +_Y_, _Z_), (α, β, γ), (_u_, _v_, _w_) is interconnected by the +electromagnetic laws. It follows from these laws that the electron, in +the sense of the scalar distribution ρ, is to be conceived as at each +instant propagating from itself an emanation which travels outwards +with the velocity of light _in vacuo_, and from which (_X_, _Y_, +_Z_) and (α, β, γ) can be calculated, so far as they are due to that +electron. Thus the field, at any time, due to the electron as a whole +depends on the previous history of the electron, the nearer to the +electron the more recent being the relevant history. The whole scheme +of such a field is one single thought-object of science: the electron +and its emanations form one essential whole, namely one thought-object +of science, essentially complex and essentially filling all space. The +electron proper, namely, the scalar distribution ρ, is the focus of the +whole, the essential focal property being that the field at any instant +is completely determined by the previous history of the focus and of +its space relations through all previous time. But the field and the +focus are not independent concepts, they are essentially correlated in +one organised unity, namely, they are essentially correlated terms in +the field of one relation in virtue of which the entities enter into +our thoughts. + +The fields of a group of electrons are superposed according to the +linear law for aggregation, namely, pure addition for analogous scalar +quantities and the parallelogram law for analogous vectors. The changes +in motion of each electron depend entirely on the resultant field in +the region it occupies. Thus a field can be viewed as a possibility of +action, but a possibility which represents an actuality. + +It is to be noted that the two alternative views of causation are +here both included. The complete field within any region of space +depends on the past histories of all the electrons, histories extending +backwards in proportion to their distances. Also this dependence can +be conceived as a transmission. But viewing the cause which effects +changes on the electron within that region, it is solely that field +within the region, which field is coincident with that electron both in +time and in space. + +This process of conceiving the actuality underlying a possibility is +the uniform process by which regularity and permanence is introduced +into scientific thought, namely, we proceed from the actuality of the +fact to the actuality of possibility. + +In conformity with this principle, propositions are the outgrowth +from actual thought-expressions, thought-objects of perceptions from +crude sense-objects, hypothetical thought-objects of perception from +actual thought-objects of perception, material points from hypothetical +infinite suites of hypothetical thought-objects of perception, +ideal points from material points, thought-objects of science from +thought-objects of perception, fields of electrons from actual mutual +reactions of actual electrons. + +The process is a research for permanence, uniformity, and simplicity +of logical relation. But it does not issue in simplicity of internal +structure. Each ultimate thought-object of science retains every +quality attributed to the whole scientific universe, but retains them +in a form characterised by permanence and uniformity. + + + _V. Conclusion_ + +We commenced by excluding judgments of worth and ontological judgments. +We conclude by recalling them. Judgments of worth are no part of +the texture of physical science, but they are part of the motive of +its production. Mankind have raised the edifice of science, because +they have judged it worth while. In other words, the motives involve +innumerable judgments of value. Again, there has been conscious +selection of the parts of the scientific field to be cultivated, and +this conscious selection involves judgments of value. These values may +be æsthetic, or moral, or utilitarian, namely, judgments as to the +beauty of the structure, or as to the duty of exploring the truth, or +as to utility in the satisfaction of physical wants. But whatever the +motive, without judgments of value there would have been no science. + +Again, ontological judgments were not excluded by reason of any lack +of interest. They are in fact presupposed in every act of life: in our +affections, in our self-restraints, and in our constructive efforts. +They are presupposed in moral judgments. The difficulty about them is +the absence of agreement as to the method of harmonising the crude +judgments of commonsense. + +Science does not diminish the need of a metaphysic. Where this need is +most insistent is in connection with what above has been termed "the +actuality underlying a possibility." A few words of explanation may +render the argument clearer, although they involve a rash approach +to metaphysical heights which it is not the purpose of this paper to +explore. + +The conception of subject and object in careless discussion covers +two distinct relations. There is the relation of the whole perceiving +consciousness to part of its own content, for example, the relation +of a perceiving consciousness to an object of redness apparent to it. +There is also the relation of a perceiving consciousness to an entity +which does not exist in virtue of being part of the content of that +consciousness. Such a relation, so far as known to the perceiving +consciousness, must be an inferred relation, the inference being +derived from an analysis of the content of the perceiving consciousness. + +The bases for such inferences must be elements in consciousness +directly known as transcending their immediate presentation in +consciousness. Such elements are universal logical truths, moral and +æsthetic truths, and truths embodied in hypothetical propositions. +These are the immediate objects of perception which are other than the +mere affections of the perceiving subject. They have the property of +being parts of the immediate presentations for individual subjects and +yet more than such parts. All other existence is inferred existence. + +In this chapter we are more directly concerned with truths embodied +in hypothetical propositions. Such truths must not be confused with +any doubtfulness which attaches to our judgments of the future course +of natural phenomena. A hypothetical proposition, like a categorical +judgment, may or may not be doubtful. Also like a categorial judgment, +it expresses a fact. This fact is twofold: as a presentation in +consciousness, it is just this hypothetical judgment; as expressing a +categorical fact, it states a relation which lies beyond consciousness, +holding between entities thereby inferred. + +But this metaphysical analysis, short though it be, is probably wrong, +and at the best will only command very partial assent. Certainly; +and this admission brings out the very point which I wished to make. +Physical science is based on elements of thought, such as judgments +registering actual perceptions, and judgments registering hypothetical +perceptions which under certain circumstances would be realised. +These elements form the agreed content of the apparatus of commonsense +thought. They require metaphysical analysis; but they are among the +data from which metaphysics starts. A metaphysic which rejects them +has failed, in the same way as physical science has failed when it is +unable to harmonise them into its theory. + +Science only renders the metaphysical need more urgent. In itself +it contributes little directly to the solution of the metaphysical +problem. But it does contribute something, namely, the exposition of +the fact that our experience of sensible apparent things is capable of +being analysed into a scientific theory, a theory not indeed complete, +but giving every promise of indefinite expansion. This achievement +emphasises the intimate relation between our logical thought and the +facts of sensible apprehension. Also the special form of scientific +theory is bound to have some influence. In the past false science +has been the parent of bad metaphysics. After all, science embodies +a rigorous scrutiny of one part of the whole evidence from which +metaphysicians deduce their conclusions. + + +FOOTNOTES: + +[Footnote 3: Cf. _Révue de Métaphysique et de Morale_, May 1916, +where this question is dealt with by the author at the end of an +article, "La théorie relationniste de l'espace."] + + + + + CHAPTER VIII + + SPACE, TIME, AND RELATIVITY + + (_Paper read to Section A at the Manchester Meeting of the British + Association, 1915, and later before the Aristotelian Society_) + + +FUNDAMENTAL Problems concerning space and time have been considered +from the standpoints created by many different sciences. The object of +this paper is the humble one of bringing some of these standpoints into +relation with each other. This necessitates a very cursory treatment of +each point of view. + +Mathematical physicists have evolved their theory of relativity to +explain the negative results of the Morley-Michelson experiment and of +the Trouton experiment. Experimental psychologists have considered the +evolution of spatial ideas from the crude sense-data of experience. +Metaphysicians have considered the majestic uniformity of space and +time, without beginning and without end, without boundaries, and +without exception in the truths concerning them; all these qualities +the more arresting to our attention from the confused accidental +nature of the empirical universe which is conditioned by them. +Mathematicians have studied the axioms of geometry, and can now deduce +all that is believed to be universally true of space and of time by the +strictest logic from a limited number of assumptions. + +These various lines of thought have been evolved with surprisingly +little interconnection. Perhaps it is as well. The results of science +are never quite true. By a healthy independence of thought perhaps we +sometimes avoid adding other people's errors to our own. But there can +be no doubt that the normal method of cross-fertilising thought is by +considering the same, or allied problems to our own, in the form which +they assume in other sciences. + +Here I do not propose to enter into a systematic study of these various +chapters of science. I have neither the knowledge nor the time. + +First, let us take the ultimate basis of any theory of relativity. +All space measurement is from stuff in space to stuff in space. The +geometrical entities of empty space never appear. The only geometrical +properties of which we have any direct knowledge are properties of +those shifting, changeable appearances which we call things in space. +It is the sun which is distant, and the ball which is round, and the +lamp-posts which are in linear order. Wherever mankind may have got its +idea of an infinite unchangeable space from, it is safe to say that it +is not an immediate deliverance of direct observation. + +There are two antagonistic philosophical ways of recognising this +conclusion. + +One is to affirm that space and time are conditions for sensible +experience, that without projection into space and time sensible +experience would not exist. Thus, although it may be true to say that +our knowledge of space and time is given in experience, it is not true +to say that it is deduced from experience in the same sense that the +Law of Gravitation is so deduced. It is not deduced, because in the act +of experiencing we are necessarily made aware of space as an infinite +given whole, and of time as an unending uniform succession. This +philosophical position is expressed by saying that space and time are +_a priori_ forms of sensibility. + +The opposed philosophical method of dealing with the question is +to affirm that our concepts of time and space are deductions from +experience, in exactly the same way as the Law of Gravitation is such +a deduction. If we form exact concepts of points, lines and surfaces, +and of successive instants of time, and assume them to be related as +expressed by the axioms of geometry and the axioms for time, then we +find that we have framed a concept which, with all the exactness of +which our observations are capable, expresses the facts of experience. + +These two philosophic positions are each designed to explain a +certain difficulty. The _a priori_ theory explains the absolute +universality ascribed to the laws of space and time, a universality +not ascribed to any deduction from experience. The experiential theory +explains the derivation of the space-time concepts without introducing +any other factors beyond those which are admittedly present in framing +the other concepts of physical science. + +But we have not yet done with the distinctions which in any discussion +of space or time must essentially be kept in mind. Put aside the +above question as to how these space-time concepts are related to +experience--What are they when they are formed? + +We may conceive of the points of space as self-subsistent entities +which have the indefinable relation of being occupied by the ultimate +stuff (matter, I will call it) which is there. Thus, to say that the +sun is _there_ (wherever it is) is to affirm the relation of +occupation between the set of positive and negative electrons which +we call the sun and a certain set of points, the points having an +existence essentially independent of the sun. This is the absolute +theory of space. The absolute theory is not popular just now, but it +has very respectable authority on its side--Newton, for one--so treat +it tenderly. + +The other theory is associated with Leibniz. Our space concepts are +concepts of relations between things in space. Thus there is no such +entity as a self-subsistent point. A point is merely the name for some +peculiarity of the relations between the matter which is, in common +language, said to be in space. + +It follows from the relative theory that a point should be definable in +terms of the relations between material things. So far as I am aware, +this outcome of the theory has escaped the notice of mathematicians, +who have invariably assumed the point as the ultimate starting ground +of their reasoning. Many years ago I explained some types of ways in +which we might achieve such a definition, and more recently have added +some others. Similar explanations apply to time. Before the theories +of space and time have been carried to a satisfactory conclusion on +the relational basis, a long and careful scrutiny of the definitions +of points of space and instants of time will have to be undertaken, +and many ways of effecting these definitions will have to be tried and +compared. This is an unwritten chapter of mathematics, in much the same +state as was the theory of parallels in the eighteenth century. + +In this connection I should like to draw attention to the analogy +between time and space. In analysing our experience we distinguish +events, and we also distinguish things whose changing relations form +the events. If I had time it would be interesting to consider more +closely these concepts of events and of things. It must suffice now to +point out that things have certain relations to each other which we +consider as relations between the space extensions of the things; for +example, one space can contain the other, or exclude it, or overlap +it. A point in space is nothing else than a certain set of relations +between spatial extensions. + +Analogously, there are certain relations between events which we +express by saying that they are relations between the temporal +durations of these events, that is, between the temporal extensions of +the events. [The durations of two events A and B may one precede the +other, or may partially overlap, or may one contain the other, giving +in all six possibilities.] The properties of the extension of an event +in time are largely analogous to the extension of an object in space. +Spatial extensions are expressed by relations between objects, temporal +extensions by relations between events. + +The point in time is a set of relations between temporal extensions. +It needs very little reflection to convince us that a point in time +is no direct deliverance of experience. We live in durations, and not +in points. But what community, beyond the mere name, is there between +extension in time and extension in space? In view of the intimate +connection between time and space revealed by the modern theory of +relativity, this question has taken on a new importance. + +I have not thought out an answer to this question. I suggest, however, +that time and space embody those relations between objects on which +depends our judgment of their externality to ourselves. Namely, +location in space and location in time both embody and perhaps +necessitate a judgment of externality. This suggestion is very vague, +and I must leave it in this crude form. + + + _Diverse Euclidean Measure Systems_ + +Turning now to the mathematical investigations on the axioms of +geometry, the outcome, which is most important for us to remember, +is the great separation which it discloses between non-metrical +projective geometry, and metrical geometry. Non-metrical projective +geometry is by far the more fundamental. Starting with the concepts +of points, straight lines, and planes (of which not all three need +be taken as indefinable), and with certain very simple non-metrical +properties of these entities--such as, for instance, that two points +uniquely determine a straight line--nearly the whole of geometry can +be constructed. Even quantitative coordinates can be introduced, to +facilitate the reasoning. But no mention of distance, area, or volume, +need have been introduced. Points will have an order on the line, but +order does not imply any settled distance. + +When we now inquire what measurements of distance are possible, we find +that there are different systems of measurement all equally possible. +There are three main types of system: any system of one type gives +Euclidean geometry, any system of another type gives Hyperbolic (or +Lobatchewskian) geometry, any system of the third type gives Elliptic +geometry. Also different beings, or the same being if he chooses, +may reckon in different systems of the same type, or in systems of +different types. Consider the example which will interest us later. +Two beings, A and B, agree to use the same three intersecting lines +as axes of _x_, _y_, _z_. They both employ a system of measurement of +the Euclidean type, and (what is not necessarily the case) agree as to +the plane at infinity. That is, they agree as to the lines which are +parallel. Then with the usual method of rectangular Cartesian axes, +they agree that the coordinates of P are the lengths ON, NM, MP. So +far all is harmony. A fixes on the segment OU_{1}, on O_x_, as being +the unit length, and B on the segment OV_{1}, on O_x_. A calls his +coordinates (_x_, _y_, _z_), and B calls them (X, Y, Z). + +Then it is found [since both systems are Euclidean] that, whatever +point P be taken, + +X = β_x_, Y = γ_y_, Z = δ_z_. [β ≠ γ ≠ δ.] + +They proceed to adjust their differences, and first take the +_x_-coordinates. Obviously they have taken different units of +length along O_x_. The length OU_{1}, which A calls one unit, B +calls β units. B changes his unit length to OU_{1}, from its original +length OV_{1}, and obtains X = _x_. But now, as he must use the +same unit for all his measurements, his other coordinates are altered +in the same ratio. Thus we now have + +X = _x_, Y = γ_y_/β, Z = δ_z_/β. + +The fundamental divergence is now evident. A and B agree as to their +units along O_x_. They settled that by taking along that axis a +given segment OU_{1} as having the unit length. But they cannot agree +as to what segment along O_y_ is equal to OU_{1}. A says it is +OU_{2}, and B that it is OU_{2}′. Similarly for lengths along OZ. + +The result is that A's spheres + +_x_^2 + _y_^2 + _z_^2 = _r_^2, + +are B's ellipsoids, + + X^2 + β^2Y^2/γ^2 + β^2Z^2/δ^2 = _r_^2, +_i. e._ X^2/β^2 + Y^2/γ^2 + Z^2/δ^2 = _r_^2/β^2. + +Thus the measurement of angles by the two is hopelessly at variance. + +If β ≠ γ ≠ δ, there is one, and only one, set of common rectangular +axes at O, namely that from which they started. If γ = δ, but β ≠ γ, +then there are a singly infinite number of common rectangular axes +found by rotating the axes round O_x_. This is, for us, the +interesting case. The same phenomena are reproduced by transferring to +any parallel axes. + +The root of the difficulty is, that A's measuring rod, which for him is +a rigid invariable body, appears to B as changing in length when turned +in different directions. Similarly all measuring rods, satisfactory +to A, violate B's immediate judgment of invariability, and change +according to the same law. There is no way out of the difficulty. +Two rods ρ and σ coincide whenever laid one on the other; ρ is held +still, and both men agree that it does not change. But σ is turned +round. A says it is invariable, B says it changes. To test the matter, +ρ is turned round to measure it, and exactly fits it. But while A is +satisfied, B declares that ρ has changed in exactly the same way as did +σ. Meanwhile B has procured two material rods satisfactory to him as +invariable, and A makes exactly the same objections. + +We shall say that A and B employ diverse Euclidean metrical systems. + +The most extraordinary fact of human life is that all beings seem to +form their judgments of spatial quantity according to the same metrical +system. + + + _Relativity in Modern Physics_ + +Owing to the fact that points of space are incapable of direct +recognition, there is a difficulty--apart from any abstract question +of the nature of space--in deciding on the motion to be ascribed to +any body. Even if there be such a thing as absolute position, it is +impossible in practice to decide directly whether a body's absolute +position has changed. All spatial measurement is relative to matter. + +Newton's laws of motion in their modern dress evade this difficulty +by asserting that a framework of axes of coordinates can be defined +by their relations to matter such that, assuming these axes to be at +rest, and all velocities to be measured relatively to them, the laws +hold. The same expedient has to be employed for time, namely, the laws +hold when the measurement of the flow of time is made by the proper +reference to periodic events. Thus the laws assert that the framework +and the natural clock adapted for their use have been successfully +found. + +But, if one framework will do, an infinity of others serve equally +well; namely, not only--as is of course the case--all those at rest +relatively to the first framework, but also all those which move +without relative rotation with uniform velocity relatively to the +first. This whole set of frameworks is on a level in respect to +Newton's laws. We will call them Dynamical frameworks. + +Now, suppose there are two observers, A and B. They agree in their +non-metrical projective geometry, _e.g._, what A calls a straight +line so does B. They also both apply a Euclidean metrical system of +measurement to this space. Their two metrical systems also agree in +having the same plane at infinity, that is, lines which are parallel +for A are also parallel for B. Furthermore, they have both successfully +applied Newton's laws to the movement of matter, and agree in having +the same sets of dynamical axes. But the framework (among these sets) +which A chooses to regard as at rest is different from the frame (among +the same sets) which B so regards. + +Without alteration of their respective judgment of rest, they choose +their co-ordinate axes so that the origins (O for A, and O′ for B) are +in relative motion along OO′, which is the axis of _x_ for both. + +Further, since OO′ is the line of symmetry of their diverse Euclidean +systems, we assume that the two measure-systems agree for planes +perpendicular to OO′, _i.e._, we assume a symmetry round OO′. +Then if, for A at O, the distance OO′ be ξ, the relations at any +instant between A's coordinates (_x_, _y_, _z_) and B's +coordinates (_x′_, _y′_, _z′_) for the same point P are +given by + +_x′_ = β(_x_ - ξ), _y′_ = _y_, _z′_ = _z_. + +Also, according to A's clock, O′ is moving forward with a uniform +velocity _v_, and we measure A's time from the instant of the +coincidence of O and O′. + +Thus + +ξ = _vt_, + +and + +_x′_ = β(_x_ - _vt_), _y′_ = _y_, _z′_ = _z_. + +We now consider B's clock, and ask for the most general supposition +which is consistent with the fact that their judgments as to the fact +of uniform motion are in agreement. + +We do not assume that events in various parts of space which A +considers to be simultaneous are so considered by B. But we assume that +at any point P, with coordinates (_x_, _y_, _z_) for A, there is a +determinate relation between B's time T and _x_, _y_, _z_, _t_. + +Put + +T = ƒ(_x_, _y_, _z_, _t_). + +Write + +P = δT/δ_x_, Q = δT/δ_y_, R = δT/δ_z_, S = δT/δ_t_. + +Now suppose that the point P is moving, and that (_u_{1}, +_u_{2}, _u_{3}) is its set of component velocities along +the axes according to A's "space and clock" system, and (U_{1}, U_{2}, +U_{3}) is its set of component velocities according to B's "space and +clock" system. Then by mere differentiation it follows after a short +mathematical deduction that + +U_{1} = {(_d_β/_dt_)(_x_ - _vt_) + β(_u_{1} - _v_)}/{P_u_{1} + Q_u_{2} + R_u_{3} + S}, +U_{2} = _u_{2}/{P_u_{1} + Q_u_{2} + R_u_{3} + S}, +U_{3} = _u_{3}/{P_u_{1} + Q_u_{2} + R_u_{3} + S}. + +But we have assumed that, whatever the direction of the resultant +velocity (_u_{1}, _u_{2}, _u_{3}), the velocities (U_{1}, U_{2}, U_{3}) +and (_u_{1}, _u_{2}, _u_{3}) are both uniform when either is uniform. + +Hence it is easily proved that β, P, Q, R, S are independent of the +coordinates (_x_, _y_, _z_) and of the time _t_. In other words, they +are constant. + +Hence we obtain + +U_{1} = β(_u_{1} - _v_)/{P_u_{1} + Q_u_{2} + R_u_{3} + S}, + +and + +T = P_x_ + Q_y_ + R_z_ + S_t_. + +But we assumed that OO′, _i.e._, O_x_, is an axis of +symmetry. It follows from this assumption that + +Q = R = 0. + +We thus obtain the simplified results + +T = P_x_ + S_t_, } +U_{1} = β(_u_{1} - _v_)/(P_u_{1} + S), } (I) +U_{2} = _u_{2}/(P_u_{1} + S), } +U_{3} = _u_{3}/(P_u_{1} + S). } + +Here we remember that (_u_{1}, _u_{2}, _u_{3}) are +the velocities of any particle according to A's "space and clock" +system, and that (U_{1}, U_{2}, U_{3}) are the velocities of the same +point according to B's "space and clock" system. We have obtained the +most general relations consistent with the facts that (1) they both +employ Euclidean systems, related as described above, and (2) they +agree in their judgments on the uniformity of velocity. + +We now compare their judgments on the magnitudes of velocities. + +Let the magnitude of the velocity of P be V according to A's judgment, +and V′ according to B's’ judgment. + +Then + + V^2 = _u_{1}^2 + _u_{2}^2 + _u_{3}^2, +V′^2 = U_{1}^2 + U_{2}^2 + U_{3}^2. + +Also we can put + +_u_{1} = _l_V, _u_{2} = _m_V, _u_{3} = _n_V, + +where (_l_, _m_, _n_) have nothing to do with the magnitude V, but +simply depend on the direction of motion. In fact (_l_, _m_, _n_) are +the "direction cosines" of the velocity according to A's judgment. By +substituting in the above equation for V^2 we see that + +_l_^2 + _m_^2 + _n_^2 = 1. + +Now, substituting for (_u_{1}, _u_{2}, _u_{3}) in +the equations (I) above, and squaring and adding, and eliminating +_m_^2 + _n_^2 by the relation just found, we at once find + +V′^2 = ((β^2 - 1)V^2_l_^2 - 2β^2V_vl_ + β^2_v_^2 + V^2)/(PV_l_ + S)^2. + +It is thus seen that in general the relation of V′ to V depends on the +direction cosine _l_. Now _l_ is the cosine of the angle +which the direction of the velocity V makes with O_x_, according +to A's judgment. + +The meaning of this relation is, that if A discharges, from guns at +the point P, shells with a given muzzle velocity V according to his +judgment, B will consider that their muzzle velocities are different +from each other, except in the case of pairs of guns equally inclined +to the axis OO′. Instances of this type of diversity of judgment can +be noted any day by any one who looks out of the window of a railway +carriage, and forgets that he is travelling. + +Now, suppose the velocity V′ bears a relation to the velocity V, which +is independent of _l_. Then _l_ must disappear from the above +formula. There are two conditions to be satisfied + +One condition is + +V^2 = β^2_v_^2/(β^2 - 1), + +or in a more convenient form + +β^2 = 1/(1 - _v_^2/V^2). + +The meaning of this condition is, that there is one, and only one, +muzzle velocity V (according to A's judgment), namely, the muzzle +velocity given by the above formula, which can have the property that +B will judge that all the guns are firing in their diverse directions +with one common muzzle velocity. + +Let us now suppose that V has this peculiar value: that is, if we look +on this value V as known, we must suppose that β is given by the second +of the above formulæ. + +The other condition allows P and S to be put in the forms + +P = -β_v_/λV^2, S = β/λ, + +where + +V′ = λV. + +Thus we have the bundle of formulæ + +β^2 = 1/(1 - _v_^2/V^2), +T = β{_t_ - _vx_/V^2}/λ, +V′ = λV. + +The value which we give to λ is purely a matter for the adjustment of +units. If we want A and B to agree in their judgments of the magnitude +of this peculiar muzzle-velocity, we put λ = 1. + +We then get the formulæ usually adopted, namely + +β^2 = 1/(1 - _v_^2/V^2), } +T = β{_t_ - _vx_/V^2}, } (II) +V′ = V. } + +But if we prefer that A and B should reckon (according to A's judgment) +in the same units of time, we put λ = β, and obtain + +β^2 = 1/(1 - _v_^2/V^2), +T = (_t_ - _vx_)/V^2, +V′ = βV. + +But A and B are in any case in such hopeless difficulties over their +comparisons of time-judgments that the detail of using the same units +does not help them much. Accordingly the formulæ marked (II) are those +used. Thus A and B agree in their judgments as to the magnitude of one +special velocity V, whatever may be the direction in which the entity +possessing it is moving. + +In order to reach this measure of agreement, they have to disagree as +to their space judgments and their time judgments. The root cause of +their disagreement is their diverse judgment as to which axis system is +to be taken at rest for the purpose of measuring velocities. + +Before discussing the nature of the disagreement disclosed in formula +(II), let us ask why we should bring these difficulties on our heads by +supposing that two people in relative motion, who both (for the purpose +of measuring velocities) assume that they are at rest, should agree in +their judgments in respect to this special velocity V. + +Such an agreement has no counterpart in any of our obvious judgments +made from railway carriages. Surely we can wait till the contingency +occurs before discussing the confusion which it creates. + +But the contingency has occurred. It occurs when we consider the +velocity of light. Perhaps I may venture to remind a philosophical +society that light moves so very quickly that it is difficult to +consider its velocity at all. So we need not be surprised that this +peculiar fact concerning its velocity is not more obvious. + +Now V being the velocity of light, unless _v_ is large, _v_/V +(and still more _v_^2/V^2) will be quite inappreciable. The only +velocity ready to hand which is big enough to give _v_/V an +appreciable value is the velocity of the earth in its orbit. + +Many diverse experiments have been made, and they all agree in +concluding that a man who assumes the earth to be at rest will find by +measurement that the velocity of light is the same in all directions. +Furthermore, when the same man turns his attention to interstellar or +interplanetary phenomena, and assumes the sun to be at rest, he will +again find the velocity of light to be the same in all directions. +These are well-attested experiments made at long intervals of time. + +This is the exact contingency contemplated above. + +Again the velocity of light _in vacuo_ has recently taken on a +new dignity. It used to be one among other wave velocities such as +the velocity of sound in air, or in water, or the velocity of surface +waves in water. But Clerk Maxwell discovered that all electromagnetic +influences are propagated with the velocity of light, and now modern +physical science half suspects that electromagnetic influences are +the only physical influences which relate the changes in the physical +world. Accordingly the velocity of light becomes the fundamental +natural velocity, and experiment shows that our judgment of its +magnitude is not affected by our choice of the framework at rest, so +long as we keep to a set of dynamical axes. These experiments on light +have been confirmed by other electromagnetic experiments not involving +light. + +Thus we are driven to equations (II), where V is the velocity of light. + +The first conclusion to be drawn from equations (II) is that two people +who make different choices of bodies at rest will disagree as to +their measuring rods in the way described above. There is no peculiar +difficulty about that. The only wonder is that all people agree so well +in their judgments as to metrical systems. A mathematical angel would +naturally expect incarnate men to be in violent disagreement on this +subject. + +But the case of time is different. For simplicity of statement we speak +of A as at O, and B as at O′. We remember that O′ is moving relatively +to O with velocity _v_ in direction OO′. Suppose A and B are +looking in this direction; and they both measure their time from the +instant when they met, as O′ passed over O. Then we have + +T = ((_t_ - _vx_)/V^2)/((1 - _v_^2)/V^2). + +Now, suppose we consider all the events all over space which A +considers to have happened simultaneously at the time _t_. The +events of this set which occurred anywhere on a plane perpendicular to +OO′ at a distance _x_ in front of O (according to A's reckoning), +will have occurred according to B's reckoning at the time T as given +above. Let us fix our attention on the fact that B does not consider +all these events to be simultaneous. For let T_{1}, and T_{2} be B's +times for such events on planes _x__{1}, and _x__{2}. Then + +T_{1} - T_{2} = _v_(_x__{2} - _x__{1})/(V^2 - _v_^2). + +Thus if _x__{2} be greater than _x__{1}, T_{2} is less than +T_{1}. Thus B judges the more distant events in front of him to have +happened earlier than the nearer events in front of him, and _vice +versa_ for the events behind. This disturbance of the judgment of +simultaneity is the fundamental fact. Obviously the measurement of time +intervals is a detail compared to simultaneity. A may think a sermon +long, and B may think it short, but at least they should both agree +that it stopped when the clock hand pointed at the hour. The worst of +the matter is that so far as any test can be applied there is no method +of discriminating between the validities of their judgments. + +Thus we are confronted with two distinct concepts of the common world, +A's space-time concept, and B's space-time concept. Who is right? It is +no use staying for an answer. We must follow the example of the wise +old Roman, and pass on to other things. + +Thus estimates of quantity in space and time, and, to some extent, even +estimates of order, depend on the individual observer. But what are +the crude deliverances of sensible experience, apart from that world +of imaginative reconstruction which for each of us has the best claim +to be called our real world? Here the experimental psychologist steps +in. We cannot get away from him. I wish we could, for he is frightfully +difficult to understand. Also, sometimes his knowledge of the +principles of mathematics is rather weak, and I sometimes suspect---- +No, I will not say what I sometimes think: probably he, with equal +reason, is thinking the same sort of thing of us. + +I will, however, venture to summarise conclusions, which are, I +believe, in harmony with the experimental evidence, both physical and +psychological, and which are certainly suggested by the materials for +that unwritten chapter in mathematical logic which I have already +commended to your notice. The concepts of space and time and of +quantity are capable of analysis into bundles of simpler concepts. In +any given sensible experience it is not necessary, or even usual, that +the whole complete bundle of such concepts apply. For example, the +concept of externality may apply without that of linear order, and the +concept of linear order may apply without that of linear distance. + +Again, the abstract mathematical concept of a space-relation +may confuse together distinct concepts which apply to the given +perceptions. For example, linear order in the sense of a linear +projection from the observer is distinct from linear order in the sense +of a row of objects stretching across the line of sight. + +Mathematical physics assumes a given world of definitely related +objects, and the various space-time systems are alternative ways of +expressing those relations as concepts in a form which also applies to +the immediate experience of observers. + +Yet there must be one way of expressing the relations between objects +in a common external world. Alternative methods can only arise as the +result of alternative standpoints; that is to say, as the result of +leaving something added by the observer sticking (as it were) in the +universe. + +But this way of conceiving the world of physical science, as composed +of hypothetical objects, leaves it as a mere fairy tale. What is really +actual are the immediate experiences. The task of deductive science +is to consider the concepts which apply to these data of experience, +and then to consider the concepts relating to these concepts, and +so on to any necessary degree of refinement. As our concepts become +more abstract, their logical relations become more general, and less +liable to exception. By this logical construction we finally arrive +at conceptions, (i) which have determinate exemplifications in the +experience of the individuals, and (ii) whose logical relations have +a peculiar smoothness. For example, conceptions of mathematical time, +of mathematical space, are such smooth conceptions. No one lives in +"an infinite given whole," but in a set of fragmentary experiences. +The problem is to exhibit the concepts of mathematical space and time +as the necessary outcome of these fragments by a process of logical +building up. Similarly for the other physical concepts. This process +builds a common world of conceptions out of fragmentary worlds of +experience. The material pyramids of Egypt are a conception, what is +actual are the fragmentary experiences of the races who have gazed on +them. + +So far as science seeks to rid itself of hypothesis, it cannot go +beyond these general logical constructions. For science, as thus +conceived, the divergent time orders considered above present no +difficulty. The different time systems simply register the different +relations of the mathematical construct to those individual +experiences (actual or hypothetical) which could exist as the crude +material from which the construct is elaborated. + +But after all it should be possible so to elaborate the mathematical +construct so as to eliminate specific reference to particular +experiences. Whatever be the data of experience, there must be +something which can be said of them as a whole, and that something is +a statement of the general properties of the common world. It is hard +to believe that with proper generalisation time and space will not be +found among such properties. + + + _Commentary added on reading the Paper before the Aristotelian + Society_ + +The first six pages of the paper consist of a summary of ideas which +ought to be in our minds while considering problems of time and space. +The ideas are mostly philosophical, and the summary has been made by +an amateur in that science; so there is no reason to ascribe to it any +importance except that of a modest reminder. There are only two points +in this summary to which I would draw attention. + +On pp. 192 and 193 there occurs-- + +"Wherever mankind ... unending uniform succession." + +If I understand Kant rightly--which I admit to be very +problematical--he holds that in the act of experience we are aware +of space and time as ingredients necessary for the occurrence of +experience. I would suggest--rather timidly--that this doctrine should +be given a different twist, which in fact turns it in the opposite +direction--namely, that in the act of experience we perceive a whole +formed of related differentiated parts. The relations between these +parts possess certain characteristics, and time and space are the +expressions of some of the characteristics of these relations. Then the +generality and uniformity which are ascribed to time and space express +what may be termed the uniformity of the texture of experience. + +The success of mankind--modest though it is--in deducing uniform laws +of nature is, so far as it goes, a testimony that this uniformity of +texture goes beyond those characteristics of the data of experience +which are expressed as time and space. Time and space are necessary +to experience in the sense that they are characteristics of our +experience; and, of course, no one can have our experience without +running into them. I cannot see that Kant's deduction amounts to much +more than saying that "what is, is"--true enough, but not very helpful. + +But I admit that what I have termed the "uniformity of the texture of +experience" is a most curious and arresting fact. I am quite ready to +believe that it is a mere illusion; and later on in the paper I suggest +that this uniformity does not belong to the immediate relations of the +crude data of experience, but is the result of substituting for them +more refined logical entities, such as relations between relations, or +classes of relations, or classes of classes of relations. By this means +it can be demonstrated--I think--that the uniformity which must be +ascribed to experience is of a much more abstract attenuated character +than is usually allowed. This process of lifting the uniform time and +space of the physical world into the status of logical abstractions has +also the advantage of recognising another fact, namely, the extremely +fragmentary nature of all direct individual experience. + +My point in this respect is that fragmentary individual experiences +are all that we know, and that all speculation must start from these +_disjecta membra_ as its sole datum. It is not true that we are +directly aware of a smooth running world, which in our speculations we +are to conceive as given. In my view the creation of the world is the +first unconscious act of speculative thought; and the first task of a +self-conscious philosophy is to explain how it has been done. + +There are roughly two rival explanations. One is to assert the world +as a postulate. The other way is to obtain it as a deduction, not a +deduction through a chain of reasoning, but a deduction through a chain +of definitions which, in fact, lifts thought on to a more abstract +level in which the logical ideas are more complex, and their relations +are more universal. In this way the broken limited experiences sustain +that connected infinite world in which in our thoughts we live. There +are three more remarks while on this point I wish to make-- + +(i) The fact that immediate experience is capable of this deductive +superstructive must mean that it itself has a certain uniformity of +texture. So this great fact still remains. + +(ii) I do not wish to deny the world as a postulate. Speaking without +prejudice, I do not see how in our present elementary state of +philosophical advance we can get on without middle axioms, which, in +fact, we habitually assume. + +My position is, that by careful scrutiny we should extrude such +postulates from every part of our organised knowledge in which it is +possible to do without them. + +Now, physical science organises our knowledge of the relations between +the deliverances of our various senses. I hold that in this department +of knowledge such postulates, though not entirely to be extruded, can +be reduced to a minimum in the way which I have described. + +I have not the slightest knowledge of theories respecting our emotions, +affections, and moral sentiments, and I can well believe that in +dealing with them further postulates are required. And in practice I +recognise that we all make such postulates, uncritically. + +(iii) The next paragraphs on pp. 193 and 194 are as follows-- + +"The opposed philosophical method ... physical science." + +It will be noted that, in the light of what has just been stated, the +first of these paragraphs (which, I hope, faithfully expresses the +experimental way of approaching the problem) really obscures the point +which I have been endeavouring to make. The phrase, "If we form the +exact concepts of points, etc.," is fatally ambiguous as between the +method of postulating entities with assigned relations, and the method +of forming logical constructions, and thus reaching points, etc., as +the result of a chain of definitions. + +Turning now to pp. 194-195, we come to the following paragraphs-- + +"The other theory ... eighteenth century." + +We note again that the relational theory of space from another point +of view brings us back to the idea of the fundamental space-entities +as being logical constructs from the relations between things. The +difference is, that this paragraph is written from a more developed +point of view, as it implicitly assumes the things in space, and +conceives space as an expression of certain of their relations. +Combining this paragraph with what has gone before, we see that the +suggested procedure is first to define "things" in terms of the data of +experience, and then to define space in terms of the relations between +things. + +This procedure is explicitly assumed in the next short paragraph: "In +this connection ... from the events." + +The gist of the remaining paragraphs of this section is contained in +the paragraph at the bottom of p. 196: "The point in time ... new +importance." + +The sentence, "We live in durations, and not in points," can be +amplified by the addition, "We live in space-extensions and not in +space-points." + +It must be noted that "whole and part" as applied to extensions in +space or time must be different from the "all and some" of logic, +unless we admit points to be the fundamental entities. For "spatial +whole and spatial part" can only mean "all and some" if they really +mean "all the points and some of the points." But if extensions and +their relations are more fundamental than points, this interpretation +is precluded. I suggest that "spatial whole and spatial part" is +intimately connected with the fundamental relation between things from +which our space ideas spring. + +The relation of space whole to space part has many formal properties +which are identical with the properties of "all and some." Also when +points have been defined, we can replace it by the conception of "all +the points and some of the points." But the confusion between the two +relations is fatal to sound views on the subject. + + + _Diverse Euclidean Measure Systems_ + +The next section deals with the measure systems applicable to space. + +A measure system is a group of congruent transformations of space +into itself. Consider a rigid body occupying all space. Let this body +be moved in any way so that the particles of the body which occupied +points P_{1}, P_{2}, P_{3}, etc., now occupy points Q_{1}, Q_{2}, +Q_{3}, etc. Then any point P_{1} in space is uniquely related to the +corresponding point Q_{1} in space by a one-to-one transformation with +certain characteristics. By the aid of these transformations we can +achieve the definition of distance in a way which definitely determines +the distance between any two points, provided that we can define what +we mean by a congruent transformation without introducing the idea of +distance. If we introduced the idea of distance, we should simply say +that a congruent transformation is one which leaves all distances +unchanged, _i. e._, if P_{1}, P_{2} are transformed into Q_{1}, +Q_{2} then the distance P_{1}P_{2} is equal to the distance Q_{1}Q_{2}. + +But mathematicians have succeeded in defining congruent transformations +without any reference to distance. + +There are alternative groups of such congruent transformations, and +each group gives a different measure system for space. The distance +P_{1}P_{2} may equal the distance Q_{1}Q_{2} for one measure system, +and will not equal it for another measure system. All these different +measure systems are on the same level, equally applicable. A being +with a strong enough head could think of them all at once as applying +to space. The result so far as it interests us in respect to the +theory of relativity is explained on pp. 197-200, ending with "The +most extraordinary fact ... same metrical system." This final sentence +bears on Poincaré's assertion that the measure system adopted is +purely "conventional." I presume that by "conventional" a certain +arbitrariness of choice is meant; and in that case, I must express +entire dissent. It is true that within the circle of geometrical ideas +there is no means of giving any preference to any one measure system, +and any one is as good as any other. But it is not true that if we +look at a normal carriage wheel, and at an oval curve one foot broad +and ten feet long, we experience any arbitrariness of judgment in +deciding which has approximately the form of a circle. Accordingly to +Poincaré the choice between them, as representing a circle, is entirely +conventional. + +Again, we equally form immediate judgments as to whether a body is +approximately rigid. We know that a paving stone is rigid, and that a +concertina is not rigid. This again necessitates a determinate measure +system, selected from among the others. + +Accordingly we conclude that (i) each being does, in fact, employ a +determinate measure system, which remains the same, except possibly +for very small variations, and (ii) the measure systems of different +human beings agree, to within the limits of our observations. These +conclusions are not the less extraordinary because no plain man has +ever doubted them. + +It is an interesting subject to investigate exactly what are the +fundamental uniformities of experience which necessitate this +conclusion. It is not so easy as it looks, since we have to divest +ourselves of all aid of scientific hypothesis if our conclusions are to +be demonstrative. + + + _Relativity in Modern Physics_ + +Pp. 201-202, "Owing to the fact ... which B so regards." + +The fundamental formulæ for the theory of relativity are the relations +between diverse co-ordinate systems given on p. 203, and formulæ II +at the bottom of p. 207. The general explanation of one method in +which these formulæ arise--namely, Einstein's method--is given on +pp. 201-211. Namely, we seek the condition that for all dynamical +axes the velocity of light should be the same, and the same in all +directions. It should be noted that the experiments which, so far as +they go, confirm these formulæ, can also be explained in another way +which makes the theory of relativity unnecessary. We need only ascribe +to the ether a certain property of contraction in the direction of +motion, and the thing is done. So no one need be bludgeoned into +accepting the rather bizarre doctrine of relativity, nor indeed any +other scientific generalisation. The good old homely ether, which we +all know, can in this case serve the purpose. Just as an author of +genius, if he lives long enough, survives the inevitable accusation +of immorality, so the ether by dint of persistence has outlived all +reputation of extravagance. But if we detach ourselves from the glib +phraseology concerning it, the scientific ether is uncommonly like the +primitive explanation of the soul, as a little man inside us, which can +sometimes be caught escaping in the form of a butterfly. As soon as the +ether has to be patched up with special properties to explain special +experiments, its scientific use is problematical, and its philosophic +use is _nil_. + +Philosophically the ether seems to me to be an ambitious attempt +to give a complete explanation of the physical universe by making +an elephant stand on a tortoise. Scientifically it has a perfectly +adequate use by veiling the extremely abstract character of scientific +generalisations under a myth, which enables our imaginations to work +more freely. I am not advocating the extrusion of ether from our +scientific phraseology, even though at special points we have to +abandon it. + +But the key to the reasons why it is worth while to consider seriously +the doctrine of relativity is to be found on pp. 209, 210: "Again the +velocity of light ... not involving light." Namely, we have begun to +suspect that all physical influences require time for their propagation +in space. This generalisation is a long way from being proved. +Gravitation stands like a lion in the path. But if it be the case, then +all idea of an immediate presentation to us of an aspect of the world +as it in fact is, must necessarily be abandoned. What we perceive at +any instant is already ancient history, with the dates of the various +parts hopelessly mixed. + +We must add to this the difficulty of determining what is at rest +and what is in motion, and the further difficulty of determining a +definite uniform flow of time. It is no use discussing this matter +as though, but for the silly extravagant doctrine of relativity, +everything would be plain sailing. It isn't. You may be quite sure +that when, after prolonged study, you endeavour to give the simplest +explanation of a grave difficulty, you will be accused of extravagance. +I have no responsibility for the doctrine of relativity, and hold no +brief for it, but it has some claim to be considered as a comparatively +simple way out of a scientific maze. + +In the first place, we use the Newtonian dynamical sets of axes, +and the Newtonian clock to extricate ourselves partially from the +difficulties of rest, motion, and time. These have proved capable +of scientific determination within the limits of our experimental +accuracy. Thus the only thing left over is the choice of the axes +at rest, which is a completely indeterminate problem on Newtonian +principles. + +Again, so far as we can at present guess by adopting the theory +that all metrical influence is electromagnetic, all influences +are propagated with the velocity of light _in vacuo_. This +electromagnetic hypothesis is by no means established, but it gives +the simplest of all possible results in respect to the propagation of +influence, which we therefore adopt. + +But what dynamical axes are we taking as at rest? Now our practical +choice gives a range of relative velocities small compared to that of +light. So except for certain refined experiments it does not matter. +There are two possibilities-- + +(i) We may assume that one set of axes are at rest, and that the others +will show traces of motion in respect to the velocity of light; or-- + +(ii) That the velocity of light is the same in all directions whichever +be the dynamical axes assumed. + +The first supposition is negatived by experiment, and hence we are +driven to the second supposition; which immediately lands us in the +whole theory of relativity. + +But if we will not have this theory we must reject the earlier +supposition that the velocity of light _in vacuo_ is the same in +all directions. This we do, in fact, by assuming an ether, and assuming +a certain law for its modification. Then we, in fact, adopt the first +supposition so far as to hold that there are dynamical axes specially +at rest, namely, at rest relatively to the undisturbed ether. Then an +assumed law for the modification of the ether so alters the velocity of +light that we explain why no dynamical axes show traces of motion. + +I wish now to go back to the point which I made a few minutes ago, +that what we perceive at any instant is ancient history with its dates +hopelessly mixed. In the earlier part of my comments I emphasised the +point that our only data as to the physical world are our sensible +perceptions. We must not slip into the fallacy of assuming that we are +comparing a given world with given perceptions of it. The physical +world is in some general sense of the term a deduced concept. + +Our problem is, in fact, to fit the world to our perceptions, and not +our perceptions to the world. + + + PRINTED IN GREAT BRITAIN BY RICHARD CLAY & SONS, LIMITED, + BRUNSWICK ST., STAMFORD ST., S.E., AND BUNGAY, SUFFOLK. + + + + +From WILLIAMS & NORGATE'S LIST + + + =A SPIRITUAL PILGRIMAGE.= By the Rev. R. J. CAMPBELL. + (The Rev. R. J. Campbell's own Story of his Religious Life.) 2nd + Impression. Demy 8vo. =7s. 6d.= net. + + "This is eminently a book for which to be thankful--simple, + straightforward, kindly. Neither does it lack the saving grace of + humour."--_Guardian._ + + "Mr. Campbell devotes a chapter to his re-ordination, and it must be + admitted that his defence of this act is effective."--_Methodist + Times._ + + =EDINBURGH.= By the Right Hon. Sir HERBERT MAXWELL, + Bart., D.C.L., Author of "Life of the Duke of Wellington," "Scottish + Gardens," etc. President of the Society of Antiquaries of Scotland, + 1910-13, and Chairman of the Royal Commission on Scottish Historical + Monuments. With a Coloured Frontispiece and 64 pages of Illustrations + of the past and present city. Medium 8vo. =10s. 6d.= net. + + A History of the Scottish Capital from the earliest times to the + nineteenth century. + + =FURTHER PAGES OF MY LIFE.= By the Right Rev. W. BOYD + CARPENTER, K.C.V.O., D.D., D.C.L., Formerly Bishop of Ripon, + Author of "Some Pages of My Life," "The Witness of Religious + Experience," etc. With Illustrations. Medium 8vo. =10s. 6d.= net. + + Reflections mingled with intimate reminiscences and recollections of + Royal personages and of men eminent in many spheres. + + =SOME PAGES OF MY LIFE.= By the Right Rev. W. BOYD + CARPENTER. New and Cheaper Edition. Large post 8vo. =5s.= + net. + + All who have listened to his eloquent preaching will read with delight + his musing on what life has brought the author. + + =RAPHAEL MELDOLA=, Hon. D.Sc. (Oxon.), Hon. LL.D. (St. And.), + F.R.S., Professor of Chemistry in the City and Guilds of London + Technical College. Reminiscences of his worth and work, by those who + knew him, together with a Chronological List of his Publications + (1868-1915). Edited by JAMES MARCHANT. With a Preface by the + Right Hon. LORD MOULTON, K.C.B., F.R.S. With a Portrait. + Crown 8vo. =5s.= net. + + "The book is one of the most delightful biographies of scientific + men that have been published during recent years."--_Chemist and + Druggist._ + + =THE MANUFACTURE OF HISTORICAL MATERIAL.= An Elementary Study in + the Sources of Story. By J. W. JEUDWINE, LL.B. (Camb.), of + Lincoln's Inn, Barrister-at-Law, Author of "The First Twelve Centuries + of British Story," and other works. Crown 8vo. =6s.= net. + + A consideration of the successive phases of Historical Research; it + explains necessary processes through which all the material has to + pass before it is placed before us as history. + + + LONDON: WILLIAMS AND NORGATE + + + + + SOME BOOKS ON RUSSIA AND POLAND + + +With a Coloured Frontispiece, 12 Photogravure Plates, 28 Illustrations + in the text, and 8 Maps. Demy 8vo. =7s. 6d.= net (postage + =6d.= extra). + + + =A Thousand Years of Russian History= + + By SONIA E. HOWE. + + "We can recommend the volume as an excellent, careful, and + well-written history of a great nation."--_Daily Telegraph._ + + + Demy 8vo. Cloth, =6s.= net. + + =The False Dmitri= + + A Russian Romance and Tragedy. Described by British Eye-witnesses, + 1604-1612. + + Edited with a Preface by SONIA E. HOWE. + + Illustrated by reproduction of contemporary portraits. + + "With more than a whiff of the atmosphere Hakluyt got into his famous + volume."--_Northern Whig._ + + "Of special interest at the present time."--_Oxford Chronicle._ + + +With 16 Plates and 28 Illustrations in the text. Demy 8vo. =7s. +6d.= net. + + =Some Russian Heroes, Saints and Sinners= + + A portrait gallery of outstanding figures in Russian history who were + typical of their times and their country. + + By SONIA E. HOWE. + + "It gives a vivid study of Russia ... and interesting book."--_Land + and Water._ + + + Fcap. 8vo. Cloth, =1s. 3d.= net. In full leather presentation + binding, =2s. 6d.= net. + + =An Outline of Russian Literature= + + By the Hon. MAURICE BARING, + + Author of "With the Russians in Manchuria," "A Year in Russia," "The + Russian People," etc. + + ∵ Gives a clear and interesting account of the growth of Russian + literature. + + +Fcap. 8vo. Cloth, =1s. 3d.= net. In full leather binding, =2s. +6d.= net. + + =Poland= + + By W. ALISON PHILLIPS, M.A., + + Lecky Professor of Modern History in the University of Dublin. + + ∵ A concise survey of the History of Poland up to 1915. + + + LONDON: WILLIAMS AND NORGATE + 14 HENRIETTA STREET, COVENT GARDEN, W.C. + + + + + =TRANSCRIBER’S NOTES= + +Simple typographical errors have been silently corrected; unbalanced +quotation marks were remedied when the change was obvious, and +otherwise left unbalanced. + +Punctuation, hyphenation, and spelling were made consistent when a +predominant preference was found in the original book; otherwise they +were not changed. + + + +*** END OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK 77011 *** diff --git a/77011-h/77011-h.htm b/77011-h/77011-h.htm new file mode 100644 index 0000000..43bb5f7 --- /dev/null +++ b/77011-h/77011-h.htm @@ -0,0 +1,6177 @@ +<!DOCTYPE html> +<html lang="en"> +<head> + <meta charset="UTF-8"> + <title> + The Organisation Of Thought | Project Gutenberg + </title> + <link rel="icon" href="images/cover.jpg" type="image/x-cover"> + <style> + +body { + margin-left: 10%; + margin-right: 10%; +} + +/* General headers */ + +h1 { + text-align: center; + clear: both; +} + +/* General headers */ +h2, h3 { + text-align: center; + font-weight: bold; + margin-top: 1em; + margin-bottom: 1em; + } + +p { + margin-top: .51em; + text-align: justify; + margin-bottom: .49em; + text-indent: 1.5em; +} + +.nind {text-indent:0;} + +.nindc {text-align:center; text-indent:0;} + +.large {font-size: 125%;} + +.spa1 { + margin-top: 1em + } + +hr { + width: 33%; + margin-top: 2em; + margin-bottom: 2em; + margin-left: 33.5%; + margin-right: 33.5%; + clear: both; +} + +.space-above2 { margin-top: 2em; } +.space-below2 { margin-bottom: 2em; } + + +.hanging2 {padding-left: 2em; + text-indent: -2em; + } + +sup { + vertical-align: super; + font-size: smaller; +} + +sub { + vertical-align: sub; + font-size: smaller; +} + +hr.chap {width: 65%; margin-left: 17.5%; margin-right: 17.5%;} +@media print { hr.chap {display: none; visibility: hidden;} } + +div.chapter {page-break-before: always;} +h2.nobreak {page-break-before: avoid;} + +table { + margin-left: auto; + margin-right: auto; +} +table.autotable { border-collapse: collapse; } +table.autotable td { padding: 0.25em; } + +.tdl {text-align: left;} +.tdr {text-align: right;} + +.tdr_ws1 {text-align: right; vertical-align: bottom; padding-right: 1em;} + +.tdlh { + text-align: left; + margin-left: 2em; + text-indent: 2em + } +.tdlh2 { + text-align: left; + margin-left: 4em; + text-indent: 4em + } + +.pagenum { /* uncomment the next line for invisible page numbers */ + /* visibility: hidden; */ + position: absolute; + left: 92%; + font-size: small; + text-align: right; + font-style: normal; + font-weight: normal; + font-variant: normal; + text-indent: 0; +} /* page numbers */ + +.blockquot { + margin-left: 5%; + margin-right: 10%; +} + +.allsmcap {font-variant: small-caps; text-transform: lowercase;} + +/* Images */ + +img {max-width: 100%; width: 100%; height: auto;} +.width500 {max-width: 500px;} +.x-ebookmaker .width500 {width: 100%;} + + +.figcenter { + margin: auto; + text-align: center; + page-break-inside: avoid; + max-width: 100%; +} + +/* Footnotes */ +.footnotes {border: 1px dashed;} + +.footnote {margin-left: 10%; margin-right: 10%; font-size: 0.9em;} + +.footnote .label {position: absolute; right: 84%; text-align: right;} + +.fnanchor { + vertical-align: super; + font-size: .8em; + text-decoration: + none; +} + +/* Poetry */ +/* uncomment the next line for centered poetry */ +.poetry-container {display: flex; justify-content: center;} +.poetry-container {text-align: center;} +.poetry {text-align: left; margin-left: 5%; margin-right: 5%;} +.poetry .stanza {margin: 1em auto;} +.poetry .verse {text-indent: -3em; padding-left: 3em;} + +/* Transcriber's notes */ +.transnote {background-color: #E6E6FA; + color: black; + font-size:small; + padding:0.5em; + margin-bottom:5em; + font-family:sans-serif, serif; +} + +/* Poetry indents */ +.poetry .indent0 {text-indent: -3em;} + +/* css needed in m2svg output: displayed equations and prevention of bad breaks*/ + .align-center { + display: block; + text-align: center; + text-indent: 0; + margin-top: 1em; + margin-bottom: 1em; + } + .nowrap { + white-space: nowrap; + } + + + </style> +</head> +<body> +<div style='text-align:center'>*** START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK 77011 ***</div> + +<figure class="figcenter width500" id="cover" style="width: 1638px;"> +<img src="images/cover.jpg" width="1638" height="2560" alt="This +collection of essays and lectures brings together Alfred North +Whitehead’s reflections on the nature of knowledge, the role of +science, and the principles of education."> + +</figure> + + +<hr class="chap x-ebookmaker-drop"> + + +<div class="chapter"> +<p class="nindc"><span class="large"> +THE ORGANISATION<br> +OF THOUGHT</span></p> +</div> + + +<figure class="figcenter width500" id="title" style="width: 671px;"> +<img src="images/title.jpg" width="671" height="1200" alt="Title page +of the book The Organisation Of Thought by Alfred North Whitehead."> + +</figure> + + +<hr class="chap x-ebookmaker-drop"> +<div class="chapter"> +<h1>THE ORGANISATION +OF THOUGHT</h1> + + +<p class="nindc"><span class="large">EDUCATIONAL AND SCIENTIFIC</span></p> + + + + +<p class="nindc space-above2 space-below2"> +<span class="allsmcap">BY</span><br> +A. N. WHITEHEAD, Sc.D., F.R.S.</p> + +<p class="nindc"><span class="allsmcap"> +FELLOW OF TRINITY COLLEGE, CAMBRIDGE, AND PROFESSOR OF<br> +APPLIED MATHEMATICS AT THE IMPERIAL COLLEGE OF<br> +SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY</span></p> + + + + +<p class="nindc space-above2 space-below2">LONDON<br> +WILLIAMS AND NORGATE<br> +<span class="allsmcap">14 HENRIETTA STREET, COVENT GARDEN, W.C.2<br> +1917</span></p> +</div> + + + +<hr class="chap x-ebookmaker-drop"> +<div class="chapter"> +<p class="nindc space-above2 space-below2"> +<i>The rights of translation are reserved</i></p> +</div> + + +<hr class="chap x-ebookmaker-drop"> + +<div class="chapter"> +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_v">[Pg v]</span></p> + +<h2 class="nobreak" id="PREFACE">PREFACE</h2> +</div> + + +<p>THE discourses included in this volume have been delivered as addresses +on various occasions which are duly noted; the only exception is +<i>The Anatomy of Some Scientific Ideas</i>, which is now published +for the first time. These discourses fall into two sections, the first +five chapters deal with education, and the remaining three embody +discussions on certain points arising in the philosophy of science. +But a common line of reflection extends through the whole, and the two +sections influence each other.</p> + +<p>I have left in each chapter the reference to the particular occasion of +its first production, and I have not sought for a verbal consistency +covering perplexity. But the various parts of the book were in fact +composed with express reference to each other, so as to form one whole.</p> + +<p>I have to thank the Syndics of the Cambridge University Press for +permission to republish the contents of Chapter V.</p> + + + +<p> +<i>Imperial College of Science and Technology,</i><br> +<span style="margin-left: 7em;"><i>April 1917.</i></span> +</p> + + +<hr class="chap x-ebookmaker-drop"> + +<div class="chapter"> +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_vii">[Pg vii]</span></p> + +<h2 class="nobreak" id="TABLE_OF_CONTENTS">TABLE OF CONTENTS</h2> +</div> + + +<table class="autotable"> +<tbody><tr> +<td class="tdl"><span class="allsmcap">CHAP. </span></td> +<td class="tdr"> <span class="allsmcap">PAGE</span></td> +</tr><tr> +<td class="tdl"><span class="allsmcap">PREFACE</span></td> +<td class="tdr_ws1"><a href="#Page_v">v</a></td> +</tr><tr> +<td class="tdl"><span class="allsmcap">I. THE AIMS OF EDUCATION—A PLEA FOR REFORM</span><br> +<span class="tdlh">(Presidential Address to the Mathematical Association,</span><br> +<span class="tdlh2">January, 1916.)</span></td> +<td class="tdr_ws1"><a href="#Page_1">1</a></td> +</tr><tr> +<td class="tdl"><span class="allsmcap">II. TECHNICAL EDUCATION AND ITS RELATION TO<br> +SCIENCE AND LITERATURE</span><br> +<span class="tdlh">(Presidential Address to the Mathematical Association,</span><br> +<span class="tdlh2">January, 1917.)</span></td> +<td class="tdr_ws1"><a href="#Page_29">29</a></td> +</tr><tr> +<td class="tdl"><span class="allsmcap">III. A POLYTECHNIC IN WAR-TIME</span><br> +<span class="tdlh">(Address at the Prize Distribution, Borough Polytechnic</span><br> +<span class="tdlh2">Institute, Southwark, February, 1917.)</span></td> +<td class="tdr_ws1"><a href="#Page_58">58</a></td> +</tr><tr> +<td class="tdl"><span class="allsmcap">IV. THE MATHEMATICAL CURRICULUM</span><br> +<span class="tdlh">(Presidential Address to the London Branch of the</span><br> +<span class="tdlh2">Mathematical Association, 1912.)</span></td> +<td class="tdr_ws1"><a href="#Page_69">69</a></td> +</tr><tr> +<td class="tdl"><span class="allsmcap">V. THE PRINCIPLES OF MATHEMATICS IN RELATION</span><br> +<span class="tdlh">TO ELEMENTARY TEACHING</span><br> +<span class="tdlh">(Paper read in the Educational Section of the International</span><br> +<span class="tdlh2">Congress of Mathematicians, Cambridge,</span><br> +<span class="tdlh2">1912.)</span></td> +<td class="tdr_ws1"><a href="#Page_92">92</a></td> +</tr><tr> +<td class="tdl"><span class="allsmcap">VI. THE ORGANISATION OF THOUGHT</span><br> +<span class="tdlh">(Presidential Address to Section A, British Association,</span><br> +<span class="tdlh2">Newcastle, 1916; also read subsequently before the</span><br> +<span class="tdlh2">Aristotelian Society.)</span></td> +<td class="tdr_ws1"><a href="#Page_105">105</a></td> +</tr><tr> +<td class="tdl"><span class="allsmcap">VII. THE ANATOMY OF SOME SCIENTIFIC IDEAS</span></td> +<td class="tdr_ws1"><a href="#Page_134">134</a></td> +</tr><tr> +<td class="tdl"><span class="allsmcap">VIII. SPACE, TIME, AND RELATIVITY</span><br> +<span class="tdlh">(Paper read to Section A at the Manchester Meeting of</span><br> +<span class="tdlh2">Section A, 1915; also, with the appended Commentary,</span><br> +<span class="tdlh2">read subsequently before the Aristotelian</span><br> +<span class="tdlh">Society.)</span></td> +<td class="tdr_ws1"><a href="#Page_191">191</a></td> +</tr> +</tbody> +</table> + + + +<hr class="chap x-ebookmaker-drop"> + +<div class="chapter"> +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_1">[Pg 1]</span></p> + +<h2 class="nobreak" id="ORGANISATION_OF_THOUGHT">ORGANISATION OF THOUGHT</h2> + + +<h2 class="nobreak" id="CHAPTER_I">CHAPTER I<br> +THE AIMS OF EDUCATION—A PLEA FOR REFORM</h2> + +<p class="nindc space-below2"> +(<i>Presidential Address to the Mathematical Association, January, +1916</i>)</p> +</div> + + +<p>WHEN I had the honour of being made President of the Mathematical +Association, I did not foresee the unusual responsibility which it +entailed. It was my intention to take as the theme of a presidential +address the consideration of some aspect of those special subjects to +which my own researches have principally been directed. Events have +forced me to abandon that intention. It is useless to discuss abstract +questions in the midst of dominant practical preoccupation. We cannot +disregard the present crisis in European civilisation. It affects every +function of life. In the harder struggle for existence which lies +before the nation, all departments of national effort will be reviewed +for judgment. The mere necessity for economy in resources will provoke +this reformation.</p> + +<p>We are concerned with education. This<span class="pagenum" id="Page_2">[Pg 2]</span> Association, so rich in its +membership of educationalists, with the conception of reform as the +very reason of its being, is among those bodies which must take the +lead in guiding that educational reconstruction which by a sociological +law follows every social revolution. We do not want impracticable +ideals, only to be realised beyond the clouds in</p> + +<div class="poetry-container"> +<div class="poetry"> + <div class="stanza"> + <div class="verse indent0">"Some wild, weird clime,</div> + <div class="verse indent0">Out of Space, and out of Time."</div> + </div> +</div> +</div> + +<p>We require to know what is possible now in England, a nation conscious +of its high achievements, and of great failures, shaken to its +foundations, distrustful of the old ways, and dreading fantastic +novelties.</p> + +<p>I will take my courage in both hands, and put before you an outline of +educational principles. What I am going to say is of course entirely +without your authority, and does not pledge or prejudge any action of +the Association. We are primarily concerned only with the intellectual +side of education, and, as mathematicians, are naturally concerned to +illustrate details more particularly by reference to mathematics. Thus +much to explain deliberate omissions in what follows.</p> + +<p>Consider now the general and special education of two types of boys, +namely those in secondary schools who in after life must form the +professional<span class="pagenum" id="Page_3">[Pg 3]</span> and directing classes in commerce, industry, and public +administration, and again those in junior technical schools and later +in advanced continuation classes, who are going to form the class of +skilled artisans and foremen of workshops. These two sets compose the +educated strength of the nation. We must form no ideals which include +less than these entire classes within their scope. What I shall say, +will in phraseology apply more directly to the secondary schools, but +with unessential changes it will apply equally to the other group.</p> + +<p>What is the first commandment to be obeyed in any educational scheme? +It is this: Do not teach too many subjects. The second command is this: +What you teach, teach thoroughly. The devil in the scholastic world +has assumed the form of a general education consisting of scraps of a +large number of disconnected subjects; and, with the artfulness of the +serpent, he has entrenched himself behind the matriculation examination +of the University of London, with a wire entanglement formed by the +Oxford and Cambridge schools' examination.</p> + +<p>Culture is activity of thought, and receptiveness to beauty, and humane +feeling. Scraps of information have nothing to do with it. A merely +well-informed man is the most useless bore on God's earth. What we +should aim at producing is men who possess both culture and expert<span class="pagenum" id="Page_4">[Pg 4]</span> +knowledge in some special direction. Their expert knowledge will give +them the ground to start from, and their culture will lead them as deep +as philosophy and as high as art. We have to remember that the valuable +intellectual development is self-development, and that it mostly takes +place between the ages of sixteen and thirty. As to training, the most +important part is given by mothers before the age of twelve. A saying +due to Archbishop Temple illustrates my meaning. Surprise was expressed +at the success in after-life of a man, who as a boy at Rugby had been +somewhat undistinguished. He answered, "It is not what they are at +eighteen, it is what they become afterwards that matters."</p> + +<p>In training a child to activity of thought, above all things we must +beware of what I will call "inert ideas"—that is to say, ideas that +are merely received into the mind without being utilised, or tested, or +thrown into fresh combinations.</p> + +<p>In the history of education, the most striking phenomenon is that +schools of learning, which at one epoch are alive with a ferment of +genius, in a succeeding generation exhibit merely pedantry and routine. +The reason is, that they are overladen with inert ideas. Education +with inert ideas is not only useless: it is, above all things, +harmful—<i>Corruptio optimi, pessima</i>. Except at rare intervals +of intellectual ferment,<span class="pagenum" id="Page_5">[Pg 5]</span> education in the past has been radically +infected with inert ideas. That is the reason why uneducated clever +women, who have seen much of the world, are in middle life so much +the most cultured part of the community. They have been saved from +this horrible burden of inert ideas. Every intellectual revolution +which has ever stirred humanity into greatness has been a passionate +protest against inert ideas. Then, alas, with pathetic ignorance of +human psychology, it has proceeded by some educational scheme to bind +humanity afresh with inert ideas of its own fashioning.</p> + +<p>Let us now ask how in our system of education we are to guard against +this mental dry rot. We recur to our two educational commandments, +"Do not teach too many subjects," and again, "What you teach, teach +thoroughly."</p> + +<p>The result of teaching small parts of a large number of subjects is the +passive reception of disconnected ideas, not illumined with any spark +of vitality. Let the main ideas which are introduced into a child's +education be few and important, and let them be thrown into every +combination possible. The child should make them his own, and should +understand their application here and now in the circumstances of his +actual life. From the very beginning of his education, the child should +experience the joy of discovery. The discovery which he has<span class="pagenum" id="Page_6">[Pg 6]</span> to make, +is that general ideas give an understanding of that stream of events +which pours through his life, which is his life. By understanding I +mean more than a mere logical analysis, though that is included. I mean +"understanding" in the sense in which it is used in the French proverb, +"To understand all, is to forgive all." Pedants sneer at an education +which is useful. But if education is not useful, what is it? Is it a +talent, to be hidden away in a napkin? Of course, education should be +useful, whatever your aim in life. It was useful to Saint Augustine +and it was useful to Napoleon. It is useful, because understanding is +useful.</p> + +<p>I pass lightly over that understanding which should be given by the +literary side of education. It is not peculiarly the function of this +Association to consider it. Nor do I wish to be supposed to pronounce +on the relative merits of a classical or a modern curriculum. I would +only remark that the understanding which we want is an understanding +of an insistent present. The only use of a knowledge of the past +is to equip us for the present. No more deadly harm can be done to +young minds than by depreciation of the present. The present contains +all that there is. It is holy ground; for it is the past, and it is +the future. At the same time it must be observed that an age is no +less past if it existed two hundred years ago than if it existed two +thousand<span class="pagenum" id="Page_7">[Pg 7]</span> years ago. Do not be deceived by the pedantry of dates. The +ages of Shakespeare and of Molière are no less past than are the ages +of Sophocles and of Virgil. The communion of saints is a great and +inspiring assemblage, but it has only one possible hall of meeting, +and that is, the present; and the mere lapse of time through which any +particular group of saints must travel to reach that meeting-place, +makes very little difference.</p> + +<p>Passing now to the scientific and logical side of education, we +remember that here also ideas which are not utilised are positively +harmful. By utilising an idea, I mean relating it to that stream, +compounded of sense perceptions, feelings, hopes, desires, and of +mental activities relating thought to thought, which forms our life. +I can imagine a set of beings which might fortify their souls by +passively reviewing disconnected ideas. Humanity is not built that +way—except perhaps some editors of newspapers.</p> + +<p>In scientific training, the first thing to do with an idea is to prove +it. But allow me for one moment to extend the meaning of "prove"; I +mean—to prove its worth. Now an idea is not worth much unless the +propositions in which it is embodied are true. Accordingly an essential +part of the proof of an idea is the proof, either by experiment or by +logic, of the truth of the propositions. But it is not essential that +this<span class="pagenum" id="Page_8">[Pg 8]</span> proof of the truth should constitute the first introduction to +the idea. After all, its assertion by the authority of respectable +teachers is sufficient evidence to begin with. In our first contact +with a set of propositions, we commence by appreciating their +importance. That is what we all do in after-life. We do not attempt, +in the strict sense, to prove or to disprove anything, unless its +importance makes it worthy of that honour. These two processes of +proof, in the narrow sense, and of appreciation do not require a rigid +separation in time. Both can be proceeded with nearly concurrently. But +in so far as either process must have the priority, it should be that +of appreciation by use.</p> + +<p>Furthermore, we should not endeavour to use propositions in isolation. +Emphatically I do not mean, a neat little set of experiments to +illustrate Proposition I and then the proof of Proposition I, a neat +little set of experiments to illustrate Proposition II and then the +proof of Proposition II, and so on to the end of the book. Nothing +could be more boring. Inter-related truths are utilised <i>en bloc</i>, +and the various propositions are employed in any order, and with any +reiteration. Choose some important applications of your theoretical +subject; and study them concurrently with the systematic theoretical +exposition. Keep the theoretical exposition short and simple, but +let it be strict and rigid<span class="pagenum" id="Page_9">[Pg 9]</span> so far as it goes. It should not be too +long for it easily to be known with thoroughness and accuracy. The +consequences of a plethora of half-digested theoretical knowledge are +deplorable. Also the theory should not be muddled up with the practice. +The child should have no doubt when it is proving and when it is +utilising. My point is that what is proved should be utilised, and that +what is utilised should—so far as is practicable—be proved. I am far +from asserting that proof and utilisation are the same thing.</p> + +<p>At this point of my discourse, I can most directly carry forward +my argument in the outward form of a digression. We are only just +realising that the art and science of education require a genius and +a study of their own; and that this genius and this science are more +than a bare knowledge of some branch of science or of literature. This +truth was partially perceived in the past generation; and headmasters, +somewhat crudely, were apt to supersede learning in their colleagues +by requiring left-hand bowling and a taste for football. But culture +is more than cricket, and more than football, and more than extent of +knowledge.</p> + +<p>Education is the acquisition of the art of the utilisation of +knowledge. This is an art very difficult to impart. Whenever a +text-book is written of real educational worth, you may be quite +certain that some reviewer will say that it<span class="pagenum" id="Page_10">[Pg 10]</span> will be difficult to +teach from it. Of course it will be difficult to teach from it. If it +were easy, the book ought to be burned; for it cannot be educational. +In education, as elsewhere, the broad primrose path leads to a nasty +place. This evil path is represented by a book or a set of lectures +which will practically enable the student to learn by heart all the +questions likely to be asked at the next external examination. And I +may say in passing that no educational system is possible unless every +question directly asked of a pupil at any examination is either framed +or modified by the actual teacher of that pupil in that subject. The +external assessor may report on the curriculum or on the performance +of the pupils, but never should be allowed to ask the pupil a question +which has not been strictly supervised by the actual teacher, or +at least inspired by a long conference with him. There are a few +exceptions to this rule, but they are exceptions, and could easily be +allowed for under the general rule.</p> + +<p>We now return to my previous point, that theoretical ideas should +always find important applications within the pupil's curriculum. This +is not an easy doctrine to apply, but a very hard one. It contains +within itself the problem of keeping knowledge alive, of preventing it +from becoming inert, which is the central problem of all education.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_11">[Pg 11]</span></p> + +<p>The best procedure will depend on several factors, none of which can +be neglected, namely, the genius of the teacher, the intellectual type +of the pupils, their prospects in life, the opportunities offered by +the immediate surroundings of the school, and allied factors of this +sort. It is for this reason that the uniform external examination +is so deadly. We do not denounce it because we are cranks, and like +denouncing established things. We are not so childish. Also, of course, +such examinations have their use in testing slackness. Our reason of +dislike is very definite and very practical. It kills the best part of +culture. When you analyse in the light of experience the central task +of education, you find that its successful accomplishment depends on a +delicate adjustment of many variable factors. The reason is that we are +dealing with human minds, and not with dead matter. The evocation of +curiosity, of judgment, of the power of mastering a complicated tangle +of circumstances, the use of theory in giving foresight in special +cases—all these powers are not to be imparted by a set rule embodied +in one schedule of examination subjects.</p> + +<p>I appeal to you, as practical teachers. With good discipline, it is +always possible to pump into the minds of a class a certain quantity of +inert knowledge. You take a text-book and make them learn it. So far, +so good. The child<span class="pagenum" id="Page_12">[Pg 12]</span> then knows how to solve a quadratic equation. But +what is the point of teaching a child to solve a quadratic equation? +There is a traditional answer to this question. It runs thus: The +mind is an instrument, you first sharpen it, and then use it; the +acquisition of the power of solving a quadratic equation is part of +the process of sharpening the mind. Now there is just enough truth in +this answer to have made it live through the ages. But for all its +half-truth, it embodies a radical error which bids fair to stifle the +genius of the modern world. I do not know who was first responsible +for this analogy of the mind to a dead instrument. For aught I know, +it may have been one of the seven wise men of Greece, or a committee +of the whole lot of them. Whoever was the originator, there can be no +doubt of the authority which it has acquired by the continuous approval +which it has received from eminent persons. But whatever its weight of +authority, whatever the high approval which it can quote, I have no +hesitation in denouncing it as one of the most fatal, erroneous, and +dangerous conceptions ever introduced into the theory of education. The +mind is never passive; it is a perpetual activity, delicate, receptive, +responsive to stimulus. You cannot postpone its life until you have +sharpened it. Whatever interest attaches to your subject-matter, must +be evoked here and now; whatever<span class="pagenum" id="Page_13">[Pg 13]</span> powers you are strengthening in the +pupil, must be exercised here and now; whatever possibilities of mental +life your teaching should impart, must be exhibited here and now. That +is the golden rule of education, and a very difficult rule to follow.</p> + +<p>The difficulty is just this: the apprehension of general ideas, +intellectual habits of mind, and pleasurable interest in mental +achievement can be evoked by no form of words, however accurately +adjusted. All practical teachers know that education is a patient +process of the mastery of details, minute by minute, hour by hour, day +by day. There is no royal road to learning through an airy path of +brilliant generalisations. There is a proverb about the difficulty of +seeing the wood because of the trees. That difficulty is exactly the +point which I am enforcing. The problem of education is to make the +pupil see the wood by means of the trees.</p> + +<p>The solution which I am urging, is to eradicate the fatal disconnection +of subjects which kills the vitality of our modern curriculum. +There is only one subject-matter for education, and that is Life +in all its manifestations. Instead of this single unity, we offer +children—Algebra, from which nothing follows; Geometry, from which +nothing follows; Science, from which nothing follows; History, from +which nothing follows; a Couple of Languages, never mastered; and<span class="pagenum" id="Page_14">[Pg 14]</span> +lastly, most dreary of all, Literature, represented by plays of +Shakespeare, with philological notes and short analyses of plot and +character to be in substance committed to memory. Can such a list be +said to represent Life, as it is known in the midst of the living of +it? The best that can be said of it is, that it is a rapid table of +contents which a deity might run over in his mind while he was thinking +of creating a world, and had not yet determined how to put it together.</p> + +<p>Let us now return to quadratic equations. We still have on hand the +unanswered question. Why should children be taught their solution? +Unless quadratic equations fit into a connected curriculum, of course +there is no reason to teach anything about them. Furthermore, extensive +as should be the place of mathematics in a complete culture, I am a +little doubtful whether for many types of boys algebraic solutions of +quadratic equations do not lie on the specialist side of mathematics. +I may here remind you that as yet I have not said anything of the +psychology or the content of the specialism, which is so necessary a +part of an ideal education. But all that is an evasion of our real +question, and I merely state it in order to avoid being misunderstood +in my answer.</p> + +<p>Quadratic equations are part of algebra, and algebra is the +intellectual instrument which has been created for rendering clear +the quantitative<span class="pagenum" id="Page_15">[Pg 15]</span> aspects of the world. There is no getting out of +it. Through and through the world is infected with quantity. To talk +sense, is to talk in quantities. It is no use saying that the nation +is large,—How large? It is no use saying that radium is scarce,—How +scarce? You cannot evade quantity. You may fly to poetry and to music, +and quantity and number will face you in your rhythms and your octaves. +Elegant intellects which despise the theory of quantity, are but half +developed. They are more to be pitied than blamed. The scraps of +gibberish, which in their school-days were taught to them in the name +of algebra, deserve some contempt.</p> + +<p>This question of the degeneration of algebra into gibberish, both in +word and in fact, affords a pathetic instance of the uselessness of +reforming educational schedules without a clear conception of the +attributes which you wish to evoke in the living minds of the children. +A few years ago there was an outcry that school algebra was in need +of reform, but there was a general agreement that graphs would put +everything right. So all sorts of things were extruded, and graphs were +introduced. So far as I can see, with no sort of idea behind them, +but just graphs. Now every examination paper has one or two questions +on graphs. Personally, I am an enthusiastic adherent of graphs. But I +wonder whether as yet we have gained very<span class="pagenum" id="Page_16">[Pg 16]</span> much. You cannot put life +into any schedule of general education unless you succeed in exhibiting +its relation to some essential characteristic of all intelligent or +emotional perception. It is a hard saying, but it is true; and I do +not see how to make it any easier. In making these little formal +alterations you are beaten by the very nature of things. You are pitted +against too skilful an adversary, who will see to it that the pea is +always under the other thimble.</p> + +<p>Reformation must begin at the other end. First, you must make up your +mind as to those quantitative aspects of the world which are simple +enough to be introduced into general education; then a schedule of +algebra should be framed which will about find its exemplification in +these applications. We need not fear for our pet graphs, they will +be there in plenty when we once begin to treat algebra as a serious +means of studying the world. Some of the simplest applications will be +found in the quantities which occur in the simplest study of society. +The curves of history are more vivid and more informing than the dry +catalogues of names and dates which comprise the greater part of +that arid school study. What purpose is effected by a catalogue of +undistinguished kings and queens? Tom, Dick, or Harry, they are all +dead. General resurrections are failures, and are better postponed. +The quantitative flux of the forces of<span class="pagenum" id="Page_17">[Pg 17]</span> modern society are capable +of very simple exhibition. Meanwhile, the idea of the variable, of +the function, of rate of change, of equations and their solution, of +elimination, are being studied as an abstract science for their own +sake. Not, of course, in the pompous phrases with which I am alluding +to them here, but with that iteration of simple special cases proper to +teaching.</p> + +<p>If this course be followed, the route from Chaucer to the Black Death, +from the Black Death to modern Labour troubles, will connect the tales +of the mediæval pilgrims with the abstract science of algebra, both +yielding diverse aspects of that single theme, Life. I know what most +of you are thinking at this point. It is that the exact course which +I have sketched out is not the particular one which you would have +chosen, or even see how to work. I quite agree. I am not claiming that +I could do it myself. But your objection is the precise reason why a +common external examination system is fatal to education. The process +of exhibiting the applications of knowledge must, for its success, +essentially depend on the character of the pupils and the genius of the +teacher. Of course I have left out the easiest applications with which +most of us are more at home. I mean the quantitative sides of sciences, +such as mechanics and physics.</p> + +<p>My meaning can be illustrated by looking<span class="pagenum" id="Page_18">[Pg 18]</span> more closely into a special +case of this type of application. In my rough catalogue of the sort +of subjects which should form the schedule for algebra, I mentioned +Elimination. It was not put there by accident, for it covers a very +important body of thought.</p> + +<p>In the first place, there is the abstract process of algebraic +elimination for suitable simple cases. The pupil acquires a firm grasp +of this by the process, inevitable in education, of working an adequate +number of examples. Again, there are the graphical solutions of the +same problem. Then we consider the significance in the external world. +We consider the velocity, time, space, acceleration diagrams. We take +uniform acceleration; we eliminate "<i>t</i>" between +<span class="align-center"><img style="vertical-align: -0.781ex; width: 33.841ex; height: 2.78ex;" src="images/1.svg" alt="Two kinematic equations of motion used to describe uniformly accelerated motion." data-tex="\[ +v = u + ft,\quad \text{and} \quad s = ut + \tfrac{1}{2}ft{^2}, +\]"></span> +and eliminate "<i>s</i>" between +<span class="align-center"><img style="vertical-align: -0.781ex; width: 37.192ex; height: 2.78ex;" src="images/2.svg" alt="Elimination of the displacemnt in the above equations." data-tex="\[ +v^2 = u^2 + 2fs, \quad \text{and} \quad s = ut + \tfrac{1}{2}ft{^2}. +\]"></span> +</p> + +<p class="nind">Then we remember that constant acceleration is a very special case, +and we consider graphical solutions or empirically given variations of +<i>v</i> or of <i>ƒ</i>. In preference, we use those empirical formulæ +which occur in the pupil's experimental work. We compare the strong and +weak points of the algebraic and graphical solutions.</p> + +<p>Again, in the same connection we plot the<span class="pagenum" id="Page_19">[Pg 19]</span> statistics of social +phenomena against the time. We then eliminate the time between suitable +pairs. We can speculate how far we have exhibited a real casual +connection, or how far a mere temporal coincidence. We notice that +we might have plotted against the time one set of statistics for one +country and another set for another country, and thus, with suitable +choice of subjects, have obtained graphs which certainly exhibited mere +coincidence. Also other graphs exhibit obvious casual connections. We +wonder how to discriminate. And so are drawn on as far as we will.</p> + +<p>But in considering this description, I must beg you to remember what I +have been insisting on above. In the first place, one train of thought +will not suit all groups of children. For example, I should expect that +artisan children will want something more concrete and, in a sense, +swifter than I have set down here. Perhaps I am wrong, but that is +what I should guess. In the second place, I am not contemplating one +beautiful lecture stimulating, once and for all, an admiring class. +That is not the way in which education proceeds. No; all the time the +pupils are hard at work solving examples, drawing graphs, and making +experiments, until they have a thorough hold on the whole subject. +I am describing the interspersed explanations, the directions which +should be given to their thoughts. The pupils<span class="pagenum" id="Page_20">[Pg 20]</span> have got to be made to +feel that they are studying something, and are not merely executing +intellectual minuets.</p> + +<p>In this connection the excellence of some of the most recent text-books +on elementary algebra emanating from members of this Association, +should create an epoch in the teaching of the subject.</p> + +<p>Finally, if you are teaching pupils for some general examination, +the problem of sound teaching is greatly complicated. Have you ever +noticed the zig-zag moulding round a Norman arch? The ancient work is +beautiful, the modern work is hideous. The reason is, that the modern +work is done to exact measure, the ancient work is varied according +to the idiosyncrasy of the workman. Here it is crowded, and there it +is expanded. Now the essence of getting pupils through examinations +is to give equal weight to all parts of the schedule. But mankind is +naturally specialist. One man sees a whole subject, where another can +find only a few detached examples. I know that it seems contradictory +to allow for specialism in a curriculum especially designed for a +broad culture. Without contradictions the world would be simpler, and +perhaps duller. But I am certain that in education wherever you exclude +specialism you destroy life.</p> + +<p>We now come to the other great branch of a<span class="pagenum" id="Page_21">[Pg 21]</span> general mathematical +education, namely Geometry. The same principles apply. The theoretical +part should be clear-cut, rigid, short, and important. Every +proposition not absolutely necessary to exhibit the main connection +of ideas should be cut out, but the great fundamental ideas should +be all there. No omission of concepts, such as those of Similarity +and Proportion. We must remember that, owing to the aid rendered by +the visual presence of a figure, Geometry is a field of unequalled +excellence for the exercise of the deductive faculties of reasoning. +Then, of course, there follows Geometrical Drawing, with its training +for the hand and eye.</p> + +<p>But, like Algebra, Geometry and Geometrical Drawing must be extended +beyond the mere circle of geometrical ideas. In an industrial +neighbourhood, machinery and workshop practice form the appropriate +extension. For example, in the London Polytechnics this has been +achieved with conspicuous success. For many secondary schools I suggest +that surveying and maps are the natural applications. In particular, +plane-table surveying should lead pupils to a vivid apprehension of the +immediate application of geometric truths. Simple drawing apparatus, a +surveyor's chain, and a surveyor's compass, should enable the pupils +to rise from the survey and mensuration of a field to the construction +of<span class="pagenum" id="Page_22">[Pg 22]</span> the map of a small district. The best education is to be found +in gaining the utmost information from the simplest apparatus. The +provision of elaborate instruments is greatly to be deprecated. To +have constructed the map of a small district, to have considered its +roads, its contours, its geology, its climate, its relation to other +districts, the effects on the status of its inhabitants, will teach +more history and geography than any knowledge of Perkin Warbeck or +of Behren's Straits. I mean not a nebulous lecture on the subject, +but a serious investigation in which the real facts are definitely +ascertained by the aid of accurate theoretical knowledge. A typical +mathematical problem should be: Survey such and such a field, draw a +plan of it to such and such a scale, and find the area. It would be +quite a good procedure to impart the necessary geometrical propositions +without their proofs. Then, concurrently in the same term, the proofs +of the propositions would be learnt while the survey was being made.</p> + +<p>Fortunately, the specialist side of education presents an easier +problem than does the provision of a general culture. For this there +are many reasons. One is that many of the principles of procedure +to be observed are the same in both cases, and it is unnecessary +to recapitulate. Another reason is that specialist training takes +place—or should take place—at a more advanced<span class="pagenum" id="Page_23">[Pg 23]</span> stage of the pupil's +course, and thus there is easier material to work upon. But undoubtedly +the chief reason is that the specialist study is normally a study +of peculiar interest to the student. He is studying it because, for +some reason, he wants to know it. This makes all the difference. +The general culture is designed to foster an activity of mind; the +specialist course utilises this activity. But it does not do to lay too +much stress on these neat antitheses. As we have already seen, in the +general course foci of special interest will arise; and similarly in +the special study, the external connections of the subject drag thought +outwards.</p> + +<p>Again, there is not one course of study which merely gives general +culture, and another which gives special knowledge. The subjects +pursued for the sake of a general education are special subjects +specially studied; and, on the other hand, one of the ways of +encouraging general mental activity is to foster a special devotion. +You may not divide the seamless coat of learning. What education has +to impart is an intimate sense for the power of ideas, for the beauty +of ideas, and for the structure of ideas, together with a particular +body of knowledge which has peculiar reference to the life of the being +possessing it.</p> + +<p>The appreciation of the structure of ideas is that side of a cultured +mind which can only<span class="pagenum" id="Page_24">[Pg 24]</span> grow under the influence of a special study. I +mean that eye for the whole chess-board, for the bearing of one set of +ideas on another. Nothing but a special study can give any appreciation +for the exact formulation of general ideas, for their relations when +formulated, for their service in the comprehension of life. A mind so +disciplined should be both more abstract and more concrete. It has been +trained in the comprehension of abstract thought and in the analysis of +facts.</p> + +<p>Finally, there should grow the most austere of all mental qualities; I +mean the sense for style. It is an æsthetic sense, based on admiration +for the direct attainment of a foreseen end, simply and without waste. +Style in art, style in literature, style in science, style in logic, +style in practical execution have fundamentally the same æsthetic +qualities, namely, attainment and restraint. The love of a subject in +itself and for itself, where it is not the sleepy pleasure of pacing a +mental quarter-deck, is the love of style as manifested in that study.</p> + +<p>Here we are brought back to the position from which we started, +the utility of education. Style, in its finest sense, is the last +acquirement of the educated mind; it is also the most useful. It +pervades the whole being. The administrator with a sense for style, +hates waste; the engineer with a sense for style, economises his +material;<span class="pagenum" id="Page_25">[Pg 25]</span> the artisan with a sense for style, prefers good work. Style +is the ultimate morality of mind.</p> + +<p>But above style, and above knowledge, there is something, a vague +shape like fate above the Greek gods. That something is Power. Style +is the fashioning of power, the restraining of power. But, after all, +the power of attainment of the desired end is fundamental. The first +thing is to get there. Do not bother about your style, but solve your +problem, justify the ways of God to man, administer your province, or +do whatever else is set before you.</p> + +<p>Where, then, does style help? In this, with style the end is attained +without side issues, without raising undesirable inflammations. With +style you attain your end and nothing but your end. With style the +effect of your activity is calculable, and foresight is the last gift +of gods to men. With style your power is increased, for your mind is +not distracted with irrelevancies, and you are more likely to attain +your object. Now style is the exclusive privilege of the expert. +Whoever heard of the style of an amateur painter, of the style of an +amateur poet? Style is always the product of specialist study, the +peculiar contribution of specialism to culture.</p> + +<p>English education in its present phase suffers from a lack of definite +aim, and from an external machinery which kills its vitality. Hitherto +in this address I have been considering the aims<span class="pagenum" id="Page_26">[Pg 26]</span> which should govern +education. In this respect England halts between two opinions. It has +not decided whether to produce amateurs or experts. The profound change +in the world which the nineteenth century has produced is that the +growth of knowledge has given foresight. The amateur is essentially a +man with appreciation and with immense versatility in mastering a given +routine. But he lacks the foresight which comes from special knowledge. +The object of this address is to suggest how to produce the expert +without loss of the essential virtues of the amateur. The machinery +of our secondary education is rigid where it should be yielding, +and lax where it should be rigid. Every school is bound on pain of +extinction to train its boys for a small set of definite examinations. +No headmaster has a free hand to develop his general education or his +specialist studies in accordance with the opportunities of his school, +which are created by its staff, its environment, its class of boys, and +its endowments. I suggest that no system of external tests which aims +primarily at examining individual scholars can result in anything but +educational waste.</p> + +<p>Primarily it is the schools and not the scholars which should be +inspected. Each school should grant its own leaving certificates, based +on its own curriculum. The standards of these schools should be sampled +and corrected. But the first<span class="pagenum" id="Page_27">[Pg 27]</span> requisite for educational reform is the +school as a unit, with its approved curriculum based on its own needs, +and evolved by its own staff. If we fail to secure that, we simply fall +from one formalism into another, from one dung-hill of inert ideas into +another.</p> + +<p>In stating that the school is the true educational unit in any national +system for the safe-guarding of efficiency, I have conceived the +alternative system as being the external examination of the individual +scholar. But every Scylla is faced by its Charybdis—or, in more homely +language, there is a ditch on both sides of the road. It will be +equally fatal to education if we fall into the hands of a supervising +department which is under the impression that it can divide all schools +into two or three rigid categories, each type being forced to adopt +a rigid curriculum. When I say that the school is the educational +unit, I mean exactly what I say, no larger unit, no smaller unit. +Each school must have the claim to be considered in relation to its +special circumstances. The classifying of schools for some purposes is +necessary. But no absolutely rigid curriculum, not modified by its own +staff, should be permissible. Exactly the same principles apply, with +the proper modifications, to universities and to technical colleges.</p> + +<p>When one considers in its length and in its breadth the importance +of this question of the<span class="pagenum" id="Page_28">[Pg 28]</span> education of a nation's young, the broken +lives, the defeated hopes, the national failures, which result from the +frivolous inertia with which it is treated, it is difficult to restrain +within oneself a savage rage. In the conditions of modern life the ride +is absolute, the race which does not value trained intelligence is +doomed. Not all your heroism, not all your social charm, not all your +wit, not all your victories on land or at sea, can move back the finger +of fate. To-day we maintain ourselves. To-morrow science will have +moved forward yet one more step, and there will be no appeal from the +judgment which will then be pronounced on the uneducated.</p> + +<p>We can be content with no less than the old summary of educational +ideal which has been current at any time from the dawn of our +civilisation. The essence of education is that it be religious.</p> + +<p>Pray, what is religious education?</p> + +<p>A religious education is an education which inculcates duty and +reverence. Duty arises from our potential control over the course +of events. Where attainable knowledge could have changed the issue, +ignorance has the guilt of vice. And the foundation of reverence is +this perception, that the present holds within itself the complete sum +of existence, backwards and forwards, that whole amplitude of time, +which is eternity.</p> + + +<hr class="chap x-ebookmaker-drop"> + +<div class="chapter"> +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_29">[Pg 29]</span></p> + +<h2 class="nobreak" id="CHAPTER_II">CHAPTER II<br> +TECHNICAL EDUCATION AND ITS RELATION TO SCIENCE AND LITERATURE</h2> +</div> + +<p class="nindc space-below2"> +(<i>Presidential Address to the Mathematical Association, January, +1917</i>)</p> + + +<p>THE subject of this address is Technical Education. I wish to examine +its essential nature and also its relation to a liberal education. Such +an inquiry may help us to realise the conditions for the successful +working of a national system of technical training. It is also a very +burning question among mathematical teachers; for mathematics is +included in most technological courses.</p> + +<p>Now it is unpractical to plunge into such a discussion without framing +in our own minds the best ideal towards which we desire to work, +however modestly we may frame our hopes as to the result which in the +near future is likely to be achieved.</p> + +<p>People are shy of ideals; and accordingly we find a formulation of the +ideal state of mankind placed by a modern dramatist<a id="FNanchor_1" href="#Footnote_1" class="fnanchor">[1]</a> in the mouth of +a<span class="pagenum" id="Page_30">[Pg 30]</span> mad priest: "In my dreams it is a country where the State is the +Church and the Church the people: three in one and one in three. It is +a commonwealth in which work is play and play is life: three in one and +one in three. It is a temple in which the priest is the worshipper and +the worshipper the worshipped: three in one and one in three. It is a +godhead in which all life is human and all humanity divine: three in +one and one in three. It is, in short, the dream of a madman."</p> + +<p>Now the part of this speech to which I would direct attention is +embodied in the phrase, "It is a commonwealth in which work is play +and play is life." This is the ideal of technical education. It sounds +very mystical when we confront it with the actual facts, the toiling +millions, tired, discontented, mentally indifferent, and then the +employers—— I am not undertaking a social analysis, but I shall carry +you with me when I admit that the present facts of society are a long +way off this ideal. Furthermore, we are agreed that an employer who +conducted his workshop on the principle that "work should be play" +would be ruined in a week.</p> + +<p>The curse that has been laid on humanity, in fable and in fact, is, +that by the sweat of its brow shall it live. But reason and moral +intuition have seen in this curse the foundation for advance. The early +Benedictine monks rejoiced<span class="pagenum" id="Page_31">[Pg 31]</span> in their labours because they conceived +themselves as thereby made fellow-workers with Christ.</p> + +<p>Stripped of its theological trappings, the essential idea remains, +that work should be transfused with intellectual and moral vision and +thereby turned into a joy, triumphing over its weariness and its pain. +Each of us will re-state this abstract formulation in a more concrete +shape in accordance with his private outlook. State it how you like, +so long as you do not lose the main point in your details. However you +phrase it, it remains the sole real hope of toiling humanity; and it +is in the hands of technical teachers, and of those who control their +spheres of activity, so to mould the nation that daily it may pass to +its labours in the spirit of the monks of old.</p> + +<p>The immediate need of the nation is a large supply of skilled workmen, +of men with inventive genius, and of employers alert in the development +of new ideas.</p> + +<p>There is one—and only one—way to obtain these admirable results. +It is by producing workmen, men of science, and employers who enjoy +their work. View the matter practically in the light of our knowledge +of average human nature. Is it likely that a tired, bored workman, +however skilful his hands, will produce a large output of first-class +work? He will limit his production, will scamp his work, and be an +adept at evading inspection; he will be slow in adapting himself<span class="pagenum" id="Page_32">[Pg 32]</span> to +new methods; he will be a focus of discontent, full of unpractical +revolutionary ideas, controlled by no sympathetic apprehension of the +real working of trade conditions. If, in the troubled times which may +be before us, you wish appreciably to increase the chance of some +savage upheaval, introduce widespread technical education and ignore +the Benedictine ideal. Society will then get what it deserves.</p> + +<p>Again, inventive genius requires pleasurable mental activity as a +condition for its vigorous exercise. "Necessity is the mother of +invention" is a silly proverb. "Necessity is the mother of futile +dodges" is much nearer to the truth. The basis of the growth of modern +invention is science, and science is almost wholly the outgrowth of +pleasurable intellectual curiosity.</p> + +<p>The third class are the employers, who are to be enterprising. Now +it is to be observed that it is the successful employers who are the +important people to get at, the men with business connections all over +the world, men who are already rich. No doubt there will always be a +continuous process of rise and fall of businesses. But it is futile +to expect flourishing trade, if in the mass the successful houses of +business are suffering from atrophy. Now if these men conceive their +businesses as merely indifferent means for acquiring other disconnected +opportunities of life, they have no spur to alertness. They are +already<span class="pagenum" id="Page_33">[Pg 33]</span> doing very well, the mere momentum of their present business +engagements will carry them on for their time. They are not at all +likely to bother themselves with the doubtful chances of new methods. +Their real soul is in the other side of their life. Desire for money +will produce hard-fistedness and not enterprise. There is much more +hope for humanity from manufacturers who enjoy their work than from +those who continue in irksome business with the object of founding +hospitals.</p> + +<p>Finally, there can be no prospect of industrial peace so long as +masters and men in the mass conceive themselves as engaged in a +soulless operation of extracting money from the public. Enlarged views +of the work performed, and of the communal service thereby rendered, +can be the only basis on which to found sympathetic co-operation.</p> + +<p>The conclusion to be drawn from this discussion is, that alike for +masters and for men a technical or technological education, which is to +have any chance of satisfying the practical needs of the nation, must +be conceived in a liberal spirit as a real intellectual enlightenment +in regard to principles applied and services rendered. In such an +education geometry and poetry are as essential as turning lathes.</p> + +<p>The mythical figure of Plato may stand for modern liberal education +as does that of St.<span class="pagenum" id="Page_34">[Pg 34]</span> Benedict for technical education. We need not +entangle ourselves in the qualifications necessary for a balanced +representation of the actual thoughts of the actual men. They are used +here as symbolic figures typical of antithetical notions. We consider +Plato in the light of the type of culture he now inspires.</p> + +<p>In its essence a liberal education is an education for thought and +for æsthetic appreciation. It proceeds by imparting a knowledge of +the masterpieces of thought, of imaginative literature, and of art. +The action which it contemplates is command. It is an aristocratic +education implying leisure. This Platonic ideal has rendered +imperishable services to European civilisation. It has encouraged art, +it has fostered that spirit of disinterested curiosity which is the +origin of science, it has maintained the dignity of mind in the face of +material force, a dignity which claims freedom of thought. Plato did +not, like St. Benedict, bother himself to be a fellow-worker with his +slaves; but he must rank among the emancipators of mankind. His type +of culture is the peculiar inspiration of the liberal aristocrat, the +class from which Europe derives what ordered liberty it now possesses. +For centuries, from Pope Nicholas V to the schools of the Jesuits, and +from the Jesuits to the modern headmasters of English public schools, +this educational ideal has had the strenuous support of the clergy.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_35">[Pg 35]</span></p> + +<p>For certain people it is a very good education. It suits their type +of mind and the circumstances amid which their life is passed. But +more has been claimed for it than this. All education has been judged +adequate or defective according to its approximation to this sole type.</p> + +<p>The essence of the type is a large discursive knowledge of the best +literature. The ideal product of the type is the man who is acquainted +with the best that has been written. He will have acquired the chief +languages, he will have considered the histories of the rise and fall +of nations, the poetic expression of human feeling, and have read the +great dramas and novels. He will also be well grounded in the chief +philosophies, and have attentively read those philosophic authors who +are distinguished for lucidity of style.</p> + +<p>It is obvious that, except at the close of a long life, he will not +have much time for anything else if any approximation is to be made to +the fulfilment of this programme. One is reminded of the calculation +in a dialogue of Lucian that, before a man could be justified in +practising any one of the current ethical systems, he should have spent +a hundred and fifty years in examining their credentials.</p> + +<p>Such ideals are not for human beings. What is meant by a liberal +culture is nothing so ambitious as a full acquaintance with the varied<span class="pagenum" id="Page_36">[Pg 36]</span> +literary expression of civilised mankind from Asia to Europe, and from +Europe to America. A small selection only is required; but then, as +we are told, it is a selection of the very best. I have my doubts of +a selection which includes Xenophon and omits Confucius, but then I +have read neither in the original. The ambitious programme of a liberal +education really shrinks to a study of some fragments of literature +included in a couple of important languages.</p> + +<p>But the expression of the human spirit is not confined to literature. +There are the other arts, and there are the sciences. Also education +must pass beyond the passive reception of the ideas of others. Powers +of initiative must be strengthened. Unfortunately initiative does not +mean just one acquirement—there is initiative in thought, initiative +in action, and the imaginative initiative of art; and these three +categories require many subdivisions.</p> + +<p>The field of acquirement is large, and the individual so fleeting and +so fragmentary: classical scholars, scientists, headmasters are alike +ignoramuses.</p> + +<p>There is a curious illusion that a more complete culture was possible +when there was less to know. Surely the only gain was, that it was more +possible to remain unconscious of ignorance. It cannot have been a gain +to Plato to have read neither Shakespeare, nor Newton, nor Darwin. +The<span class="pagenum" id="Page_37">[Pg 37]</span> achievements of a liberal education have in recent times not been +worsened. The change is that its pretensions have been found out.</p> + +<p>My point is, that no course of study can claim any position of ideal +completeness. Nor are the omitted factors of subordinate importance. +The insistence in the Platonic culture on disinterested intellectual +appreciation is a psychological error. Action and our implication in +the transition of events amid the evitable bond of cause to effect +are fundamental. An education which strives to divorce intellectual +or æsthetic life from these fundamental facts carries with it the +decadence of civilisation. Essentially culture should be for action, +and its effect should be to divest labour from the associations of +aimless toil. Art exists that we may know the deliverances of our +senses as good. It heightens the sense-world.</p> + +<p>Disinterested scientific curiosity is a passion for an ordered +intellectual vision of the connection of events. But the goal of +such curiosity is the marriage of action to thought. This essential +intervention of action even in abstract science is often overlooked. No +man of science wants merely to know. He acquires knowledge to appease +his passion for discovery. He does not discover in order to know, he +knows in order to discover. The pleasure which art and science can +give to toil is the enjoyment which arises<span class="pagenum" id="Page_38">[Pg 38]</span> from successfully directed +intention. Also it is the same pleasure which is yielded to the +scientist and to the artist.</p> + +<p>The antithesis between a technical and a liberal education is +fallacious. There can be no adequate technical education which is not +liberal, and no liberal education which is not technical: that is, no +education which does not impart both technique and intellectual vision. +In simpler language, education should turn out the pupil with something +he knows well and something he can do well. This intimate union of +practice and theory aids both. The intellect does not work best in a +vacuum. The stimulation of creative impulse requires, especially in +the case of a child, the quick transition to practice. Geometry and +mechanics, followed by workshop practice, gain that reality without +which mathematics is verbiage.</p> + +<p>There are three main methods which are required in a national system of +education, namely, the literary curriculum, the scientific curriculum, +the technical curriculum. But each of these curricula should include +the other two. What I mean is, that every form of education should give +the pupil a technique, a science, an assortment of general ideas, and +æsthetic appreciation, and that each of these sides of his training +should be illuminated by the others. Lack of time, even for the most +favoured pupil, makes<span class="pagenum" id="Page_39">[Pg 39]</span> it impossible to develop fully each curriculum. +Always there must be a dominant emphasis. The most direct æsthetic +training naturally falls in the technical curriculum in those cases +when the training is that requisite for some art or artistic craft. But +it is of high importance in both a literary and a scientific education.</p> + +<p>The educational method of the literary curriculum is the study of +language, that is, the study of our most habitual method of conveying +to others our states of mind. The technique which should be acquired +is the technique of verbal expression, the science is the study of the +structure of language and the analysis of the relations of language +to the states of mind conveyed. Furthermore, the subtle relations of +language to feeling, and the high development of the sense organs +to which written and spoken words appeal, lead to keen æsthetic +appreciations being aroused by the successful employment of language. +Finally, the wisdom of the world is preserved in the masterpieces of +linguistic composition.</p> + +<p>This curriculum has the merit of homogeneity. All its various parts +are co-ordinated and play into each other's hands. We can hardly be +surprised that such a curriculum, when once broadly established, should +have claimed the position of the sole perfect type of education. Its +defect is unduly to emphasise the importance<span class="pagenum" id="Page_40">[Pg 40]</span> of language. Indeed the +varied importance of verbal expression is so overwhelming that its +sober estimation is difficult. Recent generations have been witnessing +the retreat of literature, and of literary forms of expression, from +their position of unique importance in intellectual life. In order +truly to become a servant and a minister of nature something more is +required than literary aptitudes.</p> + +<p>A scientific education is primarily a training in the art of observing +natural phenomena, and in the knowledge and deduction of laws +concerning the sequence of such phenomena. But here, as in the case of +a liberal education, we are met by the limitations imposed by shortness +of time. There are many types of natural phenomena, and to each type +there corresponds a science with its peculiar modes of observation, +and its peculiar types of thought employed in the deduction of laws. A +study of science in general is impossible in education, all that can be +achieved is the study of two or three allied sciences. Hence the charge +of narrow specialism urged against any education which is primarily +scientific. It is obvious that the charge is apt to be well-founded; +and it is worth considering how, within the limits of a scientific +education and to the advantage of such an education, the danger can be +avoided.</p> + +<p>Such a discussion requires the consideration of<span class="pagenum" id="Page_41">[Pg 41]</span> technical education. A +technical education is in the main a training in the art of utilising +knowledge for the manufacture of material products. Such a training +emphasises manual skill, and the co-ordinated action of hand and +eye, and judgment in the control of the process of construction. But +judgment necessitates knowledge of those natural processes of which the +manufacture is the utilisation. Thus somewhere in technical training +an education in scientific knowledge is required. If you minimise +the scientific side, you will confine it to the scientific experts; +if you maximise it, you will impart it in some measure to the men, +and—what is of no less importance—to the directors and managers of +the businesses.</p> + +<p>Technical education is not necessarily allied exclusively to science +on its mental side. It may be an education for an artist or for +apprentices to an artistic craft. In that case æsthetic appreciation +will have to be cultivated in connection with it.</p> + +<p>An evil side of the Platonic culture has been its total neglect of +technical education as an ingredient in the complete development +of ideal human beings. This neglect has arisen from two disastrous +antitheses, namely, that between mind and body, and that between +thought and action. I will here interject, solely to avoid criticism, +that I am well aware that the Greeks highly valued physical beauty and +physical<span class="pagenum" id="Page_42">[Pg 42]</span> activity. They had, however, that perverted sense of values +which is the nemesis of slave-owning.</p> + +<p>I lay it down as an educational axiom that in teaching you will come +to grief as soon as you forget that your pupils have bodies. This is +exactly the mistake of the post-renaissance Platonic curriculum. But +nature can be kept at bay by no pitchfork; so in English education, +being expelled from the classroom, she returned with a cap and bells in +the form of all-conquering athleticism.</p> + +<p>The connections between intellectual activity and the body, though +diffused in every bodily feeling, are focussed in the eyes, the ears, +the voice, and the hands. There is a co-ordination of senses and +thought, and also a reciprocal influence between brain activity and +material creative activity. In this reaction the hands are peculiarly +important. It is a moot point whether the human hand created the human +brain, or the brain created the hand. Certainly the connection is +intimate and reciprocal. Such deep-seated relations are not widely +atrophied by a few hundred years of disuse in exceptional families.</p> + +<p>The disuse of hand-craft is a contributory cause to the brain-lethargy +of aristocracies, which is only mitigated by sport where the concurrent +brain-activity is reduced to a minimum and the hand-craft lacks +subtlety. The necessity for<span class="pagenum" id="Page_43">[Pg 43]</span> constant writing and vocal exposition is +some slight stimulus to the thought-power of the professional classes. +Great readers, who exclude other activities, are not distinguished by +subtlety of brain. They tend to be timid conventional thinkers. No +doubt this is partly due to their excessive knowledge outrunning their +powers of thought; but it is partly due to the lack of brain-stimulus +from the productive activities of hand or voice.</p> + +<p>In estimating the importance of technical education we must rise above +the exclusive association of learning with book-learning. First-hand +knowledge is the ultimate basis of intellectual life. To a large +extent book-learning conveys second-hand information, and as such can +never rise to the importance of immediate practice. Our goal is to see +the immediate event of our lives as instances of our general ideas. +What the learned world tends to offer is one second-hand scrap of +information illustrating ideas derived from another second-hand scrap +of information. The second-handedness of the learned world is the +secret of its mediocrity. It is tame because it has never been scared +by facts. The main importance of Francis Bacon's influence does not +lie in any peculiar theory of inductive reasoning which he happened to +express, but in the revolt against second-hand information of which he +was a leader.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_44">[Pg 44]</span></p> + +<p>The peculiar merit of a scientific education should be, that it bases +thought upon first-hand observation; and the corresponding merit of a +technical education is, that it follows our deep natural instinct to +translate thought into manual skill, and manual activity into thought.</p> + +<p>We are a Mathematical Association, and it is natural to ask: Where do +we come in? We come in just at this point.</p> + +<p>The thought which science evokes is logical thought. Now logic is of +two kinds: the logic of discovery and the logic of the discovered.</p> + +<p>The logic of discovery consists in the weighing of probabilities, in +discarding details deemed to be irrelevant, in divining the general +rules according to which events occur, and in testing hypotheses by +devising suitable experiments. This is inductive logic.</p> + +<p>The logic of the discovered is the deduction of the special events +which, under certain circumstances, would happen in obedience to the +assumed laws of nature. Thus when the laws are discovered or assumed, +their utilisation entirely depends on deductive logic. Without +deductive logic science would be entirely useless. It is merely a +barren game to ascend from the particular to the general, unless +afterwards we can reverse the process and descend from the general to +the particular, ascending and descending like the angels on Jacob's +ladder. When Newton<span class="pagenum" id="Page_45">[Pg 45]</span> had divined the law of gravitation he at once +proceeded to calculate the earth's attractions on an apple at its +surface and on the moon. We may note in passing that inductive logic +would be impossible without deductive logic. Thus Newton's calculations +were an essential step in his inductive verification of the great law.</p> + +<p>Now mathematics is nothing else than the more complicated parts of +the art of deductive reasoning, especially where it concerns number, +quantity, and space.</p> + +<p>In the teaching of science, the art of thought should be taught: +namely, the art of forming clear conceptions applying to first-hand +experience, the art of divining the general truths which apply, the +art of testing divinations, and the art of utilising general truths +by reasoning to more particular cases of some peculiar importance. +Furthermore, a power of scientific exposition is necessary, so that the +relevant issues from a confused mass of ideas can be stated clearly, +with due emphasis on important points.</p> + +<p>By the time a science, or a small group of sciences, has been taught +thus amply, with due regard to the general art of thought, we have gone +a long way towards correcting the specialism of science. The worst +of a scientific education based, as necessarily must be the case, on +one or two particular branches of science, is that the teachers under +the influence of the examination<span class="pagenum" id="Page_46">[Pg 46]</span> system are apt merely to stuff +their pupils with the narrow results of these special sciences. It is +essential that the generality of the method be continually brought to +light and contrasted with the speciality of the particular application. +A man who only knows his own science, as a routine peculiar to that +science, does not even know that. He has no fertility of thought, no +power of quickly seizing the bearing of alien ideas. He will discover +nothing, and be stupid in practical applications.</p> + +<p>This exhibition of the general in the particular is extremely difficult +to effect, especially in the case of younger pupils. The art of +education is never easy. To surmount its difficulties, especially those +of elementary education, is a task worthy of the highest genius. It is +the training of human souls.</p> + +<p>Mathematics, well taught, should be the most powerful instrument +in gradually implanting this generality of idea. The essence of +mathematics is perpetually to be discarding more special ideas in +favour of more general ideas, and special methods in favour of general +methods. We express the conditions of a special problem in the form of +an equation, but that equation will serve for a hundred other problems, +scattered through diverse sciences. The general reasoning is always +the powerful reasoning, because deductive cogency is the property of +abstract form.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_47">[Pg 47]</span></p> + +<p>Here, again, we must be careful. We shall ruin mathematical education +if we use it merely to impress general truths. The general ideas are +the means of connecting particular results. After all, it is the +concrete special cases which are important. Thus in the handling of +mathematics in your results you cannot be too concrete, and in your +methods you cannot be too general. The essential course of reasoning +is to generalise what is particular, and then to particularise what is +general. Without generality there is no reasoning, without concreteness +there is no importance.</p> + +<p>Concreteness is the strength of technical education. I would remind +you that truths which lack the highest generality are not necessarily +concrete facts. For example, <i>x</i> + <i>y</i> = <i>y</i> + <i>x</i> +is an algebraic truth more general than 2 + 2 = 4. But "two and two +make four" is itself a highly general proposition lacking any element +of concreteness. To obtain a concrete proposition immediate intuition +of a truth concerning particular objects is requisite; for example, +"these two apples and those apples together make four apples" is a +concrete proposition, if you have direct perception or immediate memory +of the apples.</p> + +<p>In order to obtain the full realisation of truths as applying, and not +as empty formulæ, there is no alternative to technical education. Mere<span class="pagenum" id="Page_48">[Pg 48]</span> +passive observation is not sufficient. In creation only is there vivid +insight into the properties of the object thereby produced. If you +want to understand anything, make it yourself, is a sound rule. Your +faculties will be alive, your thoughts gain vividness by an immediate +translation into acts. Your ideas gain that reality which comes from +seeing the limits of their application.</p> + +<p>In elementary education this doctrine has long been put into practice. +Young children are taught to familiarise themselves with shapes and +colours by simple manual operations of cutting out and of sorting. But +good though this is, it is not quite what I mean. That is practical +experience before you think, experience antecedent to thought in order +to create ideas, a very excellent discipline. But technical education +should be much more than that: it is creative experience while you +think, experience which realises your thought, experience which teaches +you to co-ordinate act and thought, experience leading you to associate +thought with foresight and foresight with achievement. Technical +education gives theory, and a shrewd insight as to where theory fails.</p> + +<p>A technical education is not to be conceived as a maimed alternative +to the perfect Platonic culture: namely, as a defective training +unfortunately made necessary by cramped conditions of life. No +human being can attain to anything<span class="pagenum" id="Page_49">[Pg 49]</span> but fragmentary knowledge and a +fragmentary training of his capacities. There are, however, three main +roads along which we can proceed with good hope of advancing towards +the best balance of intellect and character: these are the way of +literary culture, the way of scientific culture, the way of technical +culture. No one of these methods can be exclusively followed without +grave loss of intellectual activity and of character. But a mere +mechanical mixture of the three curricula will produce bad results in +the shape of scraps of information never interconnected or utilised. +We have already noted as one of the strong points of the traditional +literary culture that all its parts are co-ordinated. The problem +of education is to retain the dominant emphasis, whether literary, +scientific, or technical, and without loss of co-ordination to infuse +into each way of education something of the other two.</p> + +<p>To make definite the problem of technical education fix attention on +two ages: one thirteen, when elementary education ends; and the other +seventeen, when technical education ends so far as it is compressed +within a school curriculum. I am aware that for artisans in junior +technical schools a three-years' course would be more usual. On the +other hand, for naval officers, and for directing classes generally, +a longer time can be afforded. We want to consider the<span class="pagenum" id="Page_50">[Pg 50]</span> principles +to govern a curriculum which shall land these children at the age of +seventeen in the position of having technical skill useful to the +community.</p> + +<p>Their technical manual training should start at thirteen, bearing a +modest proportion to the rest of their work, and should increase in +each year finally to attain to a substantial proportion. Above all +things it should not be too specialised. Workshop finish and workshop +dodges, adapted to one particular job, should be taught in the +commercial workshop, and should form no essential part of the school +course. A properly trained worker would pick them up in no time. In all +education the main cause of failure is staleness. Technical education +is doomed if we conceive it as a system for catching children young and +for giving them one highly specialised manual aptitude. The nation has +need of a fluidity of labour, not merely from place to place, but also +within reasonable limits of allied aptitudes, from one special type of +work to another special type. I know that here I am on delicate ground, +and I am not claiming that men while they are specialising on one sort +of work should spasmodically be set to other kinds. That is a question +of trade organisation with which educationalists have no concern. I am +only asserting the principles that training should be broader than the +ultimate specialisation,<span class="pagenum" id="Page_51">[Pg 51]</span> and that the resulting power of adaptation to +varying demands is advantageous to the workers, to the employers, and +to the nation.</p> + +<p>In considering the intellectual side of the curriculum we must be +guided by the principle of the co-ordination of studies. In general, +the intellectual studies most immediately related to manual training +will be some branches of science. More than one branch will, in fact, +be concerned; and even if that be not the case, it is impossible to +narrow down scientific study to a single thin line of thought. It is +possible, however, provided that we do not press the classification +too far, roughly to classify technical pursuits according to the +dominant science involved. We thus find a sixfold division, namely, +(1) Geometrical techniques, (2) Mechanical techniques, (3) Physical +techniques, (4) Chemical techniques, (5) Biological techniques, (6) +Techniques of commerce and of social service.</p> + +<p>By this division, it is meant that apart from auxiliary sciences +some particular science requires emphasis in the training for most +occupations. We can, for example, reckon carpentry, ironmongery, +and many artistic crafts among geometrical techniques. Similarly +agriculture is a biological technique. Probably cookery, if it includes +food catering, would fall midway between biological, physical, and +chemical sciences, though of this I am not sure.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_52">[Pg 52]</span></p> + +<p>The sciences associated with commerce and social service would be +partly algebra, including arithmetic and statistics, and partly +geography and history. But this section is somewhat heterogeneous in +its scientific affinities. Anyhow the exact way in which technical +pursuits are classified in relation to science is a detail. The +essential point is, that with some thought it is possible to find +scientific courses which illuminate most occupations. Furthermore, the +problem is well understood, and has been brilliantly solved in many of +the schools of technology and junior technical schools throughout the +country.</p> + +<p>In passing from science to literature, in our review of the +intellectual elements of technical education, we note that many studies +hover between the two: for example, history and geography. They are +both of them very essential in education, provided that they are the +right history and the right geography. Also books giving descriptive +accounts of general results, and trains of thought in various sciences +fall in the same category. Such books should be partly historical +and partly expository of the main ideas which have finally arisen. +Prof. R. A. Gregory's recent book, <i>Discovery</i>, and the <i>Home +University Library</i> series illustrate my meaning. Their value in +education depends on their quality as mental stimulants. They must not +be inflated<span class="pagenum" id="Page_53">[Pg 53]</span> with gas on the wonders of science, and must be informed +with a broad outlook.</p> + +<p>It is unfortunate that the literary element in education has rarely +been considered apart from grammatical study. The historical reason is, +that when the modern Platonic curriculum was being formed Latin and +Greek were the sole keys which rendered great literature accessible. +But there is no necessary connection between literature and grammar. +The great age of Greek literature was already past before the arrival +of the grammarians of Alexandria. Of all types of men to-day existing, +classical scholars are the most remote from the Greeks of the Periclean +times.</p> + +<p>Mere literary knowledge is of slight importance. The only thing that +matters is, how it is known. The facts related are nothing. Literature +only exists to express and develop that imaginative world which is our +life, the kingdom which is within us. It follows that the literary side +of a technical education should consist in an effort to make the pupils +enjoy literature. It does not matter what they know, but the enjoyment +is vital. The great English Universities, under whose direct authority +school-children are examined in plays of Shakespeare, to the certain +destruction of their enjoyment, should be prosecuted for soul-murder.</p> + +<p>Now there are two kinds of intellectual<span class="pagenum" id="Page_54">[Pg 54]</span> enjoyment: the enjoyment of +creation, and the enjoyment of relaxation. They are not necessarily +separated. A change of occupation may give the full tide of happiness +which comes from the concurrence of both forms of pleasure. The +appreciation of literature is really creation. The written word, its +music, and its associations, are only the stimuli. The vision which +they evoke is our own doing. No one, no genius other than our own, +can make our own life live. But except for those engaged in literary +occupations, literature is also a relaxation. It gives exercise to that +other side which any occupation must suppress during the working hours. +Art also has the same function in life as has literature.</p> + +<p>To obtain the pleasure of relaxation requires no help. The pleasure +is merely to cease doing. Some such pure relaxation is a necessary +condition of health. Its dangers are notorious, and to the greater +part of the necessary relaxation nature has affixed, not enjoyment, +but the oblivion of sleep. Creative enjoyment is the outcome of +successful effort and requires help for its initiation. Such enjoyment +is necessary for high-speed work and for original achievement.</p> + +<p>To speed up production with unrefreshed workmen is a disastrous +economic policy. Temporary success will be at the expense of the +nation, which, for long years of their lives, will have to support +worn-out artisans—unemployables.<span class="pagenum" id="Page_55">[Pg 55]</span> Equally disastrous is the +alternation of spasms of effort with periods of pure relaxation. +Such periods are the seed-times of degeneration, unless rigorously +curtailed. The normal recreation should be change of activity, +satisfying the cravings of instincts. Games afford such activity. Their +disconnection emphasises the relaxation, but their excess leaves us +empty.</p> + +<p>It is here that literature and art should play an essential part in +a healthily organised nation. Their services to economic production +would be only second to those of sleep or of food. I am not now talking +of the training of an artist, but of the use of art as a condition of +healthy life. It is analogous to sunshine in the physical world.</p> + +<p>When we have once rid our minds of the idea that knowledge is to +be exacted, there is no especial difficulty or expense involved in +helping the growth of artistic enjoyment. All school-children could +be sent at regular intervals to neighbouring theatres where suitable +plays could be subsidised. Similarly for concerts and cinema films. +Pictures are more doubtful in their popular attraction; but interesting +representations of scenes or ideas which the children have read about +would probably appeal. The pupils themselves should be encouraged +in artistic efforts. Above all the art of reading aloud should be +cultivated. The Roger de Coverley essays of Addison are perfect +examples of readable prose.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_56">[Pg 56]</span></p> + +<p>Art and literature have not merely an indirect effect on the main +energies of life. Directly, they give vision. The world spreads wide +beyond the deliverances of material sense, with subtleties of reaction +and with pulses of emotion. Vision is the necessary antecedent to +control and to direction. In the contest of races which in its final +issues will be decided in the workshops and not on the battle-field, +the victory will belong to those who are masters of stores of trained +nervous energy, working under conditions favourable to growth. One such +essential condition is Art.</p> + +<p>If there had been time, there are other things which I should like +to have said: for example, to advocate the inclusion of one foreign +language in all education. From direct observation I know this to be +possible for artisan children. But enough has been put before you, +to make plain the principles with which we should undertake national +education.</p> + +<p>In conclusion, I recur to the thought of the Benedictines, who +saved for mankind the vanishing civilisation of the ancient world +by linking together knowledge, labour, and moral energy. Our danger +is to conceive practical affairs as the kingdom of evil, in which +success is only possible by the extrusion of ideal aims. I believe +that such a conception is a fallacy directly negatived by practical +experience. In education this error<span class="pagenum" id="Page_57">[Pg 57]</span> takes the form of a mean view of +technical training. Our forefathers in the dark ages saved themselves +by embodying high ideals in great organisations. It is our task, +without servile imitation, boldly to exercise our creative energies, +remembering amid discouragements that the coldest hour immediately +precedes the dawn.</p> + + +<div class="footnotes"><h3>FOOTNOTES:</h3> + +<div class="footnote"> + +<p class="nind"><a id="Footnote_1" href="#FNanchor_1" class="label">[1]</a> +<i>Cf.</i> <span class="allsmcap">BERNARD SHAW</span>: <i>John Bull's Other +Island</i>.</p> + +</div> +</div> + + +<hr class="chap x-ebookmaker-drop"> + +<div class="chapter"> +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_58">[Pg 58]</span></p> +<h2 class="nobreak" id="CHAPTER_III">CHAPTER III<br> +A POLYTECHNIC IN WAR-TIME</h2> +</div> + +<p class="nindc space-below2"> +<i>Address at the Prize Distribution, Borough Polytechnic Institute, +Southwark, 16th February, 1917</i></p> + + +<p>I WILL commence by drawing your attention to some of the satisfactory +features of the Principal's report on the work of the Institute during +the past year. It has been a year of great difficulties. Some of our +staff are serving with the colours, and our classes have been depleted. +But in spite of everything, we have done very well. First, the average +result in the examinations has been good, surprisingly good in view of +the present circumstances. The Governors attach great importance to +the maintenance of a high average result; it is the best single test +of efficiency. Again, our individual successes have been notable. We +have gained—I say <i>we</i> because we are all one in our pleasure at +these successes—we have gained two £80 L.C.C. scholarships, nineteen +exhibitions, in addition to a first-place, and medals, prizes and +certificates. All this is very satisfactory. It tells of efficient<span class="pagenum" id="Page_59">[Pg 59]</span> +teaching, and of hard work and regular attendance on the part of the +students. We know that we are keeping up the standard of efficiency +which in the past has been a source of pride to every one connected +with this Institute.</p> + +<p>Now all this good work does not come about by itself without any one +making an effort. Such a record requires our skilled staff of teachers +and organisers. They have worked very hard during the last session +under great difficulties, in order to create the successful result +which we are here to celebrate. I know something about teaching. It +is very exacting work, and can be made successful only by continual +devotion. I am sure that I am voicing your feelings, and I know that +I am expressing those of the Governors, when I thank the ladies and +gentlemen of the staff very heartily for their services during the last +session.</p> + +<p>Prize-givings are always pleasant occasions. We have come here to think +about our successes, and to congratulate our students. There is no more +satisfactory Governors' Meeting in the course of the year than when we +meet on this occasion, and face our friends and tell them how pleased +we are at the successful result of their hard work. This evening I am +in a doubly happy position, for my colleagues have asked me to be their +spokesman in tendering our good wishes to the prize-winners. You have +worked<span class="pagenum" id="Page_60">[Pg 60]</span> hard and you have done well, and I am sure that you all deserve +your successes; they are a pleasure not only to you, but in your homes +and to your companions and fellow-students.</p> + +<p>Successful work here will enable you to acquire skill in your trades, +and thereby the better to earn your living. Earning a living is on the +average no bad test of service rendered to the community. A man who +has made himself skilful in his trade and has done well for himself in +his walk of life, has in general good reason to believe that he is a +citizen who has benefited his country. It is an evil day for a nation +when it loses respect for success in industry.</p> + +<p>But if you steer your lives by the compass which points steadily to +the North Pole of personal success, you will have missed your greatest +chances in life. The genial climate is in the south.</p> + +<p>What I mean is this: you must make up your mind to find the best part +of your happiness in kindly helpful relations with others. It should be +our ambition to leave our own small corner of the world a little tidier +and a little happier than when we entered it. I am well aware that +this is an old story; but old stories are sometimes true, and this is +the biggest truth in the whole world. The warm kindly feelings are the +happy feelings. The fortunate people are those whose minds are filled +with thoughts in which they forget themselves and remember others. It +is not<span class="pagenum" id="Page_61">[Pg 61]</span> true that nature is a mere scene of struggle in which every one +competes with his neighbour. Those communities thrive best and last +longest which are filled with a spirit of mutual help.</p> + +<p>The future of the country lies with you. The crown of your success +is the promise of future work, often unrecognised work, done under +discouragement, but done steadily and cheerfully. It is on you that +the country depends for the maintenance and the growth of those ideals +without which a race withers. Do not be discouraged by difficulties +which seem unsurmountable. The conditions of life which mould us all +are modified by our will, by our energy, and by the purity of our +intentions.</p> + +<p>If we may judge of intensity of feeling by length of memory, the +enjoyment of receiving a prize bites very deep. Across the space of +more than forty years, before many of your parents were born, or when +they were being carried about in long clothes, I can remember, as if it +were yesterday, the occasion when I received my first prize at school. +I can see the mediæval school-room, the headmaster, and my companions. +Perhaps some of you, when a generation has passed by, will remember the +scene to-night—this Stanley Gymnasium recalling the memory of Miss +Maude Stanley, who devoted to our welfare so much of her energy and +her thought—the adjoining Edric Hall associated with the name of<span class="pagenum" id="Page_62">[Pg 62]</span> Mr. +Edric Bayley, the Father of the Institute; Mr. Millis and Miss Smith, +the first Principal and the first Lady Superintendent, the architects +of our prosperity; Mr. Leonard Spicer, our Chairman and member of a +family and of a firm known throughout the world, and respected in +proportion as they are known. And the cause why to-night we are a small +gathering is one more reason why this assembly can never slip from your +memory. We meet at a moment when England stands in as deadly a peril as +in any previous moment of her history—such peril as when the Spanish +ships of the Armada rode in the English Channel, or when Napoleon +watched our coast across the Strait of Dover. The present danger can be +overcome only by the same courage as that which saved our freedom in +those former times.</p> + +<p>Therefore, to-night, in recalling the activities of the various +sections of our society which form this great Polytechnic Institute, +our thoughts go further afield. They travel by land and by sea, till +they bring before our minds the gallant band whom this Institute has +sent to the Front—more than 800 of our members are with the Colours. +What our fighting men have done for us, for the world in general, and +for the future of England, is so overwhelming that words cannot praise +them enough. I will just say one thing to you: When you read of great +deeds<span class="pagenum" id="Page_63">[Pg 63]</span> done in past times, of perils encountered, of adventures, of +undaunted courage, of patriotism, of self-sacrifice, of suffering +endured for noble cause, you each can say—I, too, have known such +heroes; they are among my countrymen, they are among my fellow-workers, +they are among my fellow-students and companions, they are among the +dear inmates of my home. And for those who have fallen, it is for us +to erect a monument sufficient to transmit to future ages the memory +of their sacrifice. For this purpose there is only one memorial which +can suffice, namely, the cause for which they died. The greatness of +England, the future of England, has been left by them to our keeping. +Guard it well.</p> + +<p>The greatness of a country is nothing else than the greatness of the +lives of the men and of the women who compose it. Do not look round and +think who ought to be great Englishmen—be great yourselves—you are +the people to achieve it, you who are sitting here to-night. There can +be no substitute service for this purpose. It is the collective energy +of the whole people that will be needed to fashion a new England worthy +of the sufferings which for its sake have been endured.</p> + +<p>A few days ago I asked a man who has worked in Egypt for many years +under Lord Kitchener, what he would pick out as the best sign of Lord +Kitchener's greatness. He answered, whatever<span class="pagenum" id="Page_64">[Pg 64]</span> Kitchener set himself to +do, thereby became important. Now that is the secret of it all—take +hold of your opportunities and make them important.</p> + +<p>Here we are in this Borough Polytechnic. What an opportunity it +represents. This Institute is a centre for social meeting, a centre +for recreation, a centre for education, a centre for discussion. We +will not sacrifice any one of our sides. They must all be part of the +greatness which we claim. Make them all first-rate.</p> + +<p>Consider first the social and recreative sides. For heaven's sake don't +think that you must be dull in order to be great. There is no finer +test of a nation than the way in which it fashions its amusements. +Three centuries ago after the Armada we made a good start in Southwark. +Shakespeare had his theatre here and wrote his plays to be acted in +this borough. He has walked these streets, and if you had met him in +Westminster he would, quite likely, have told you that he was going +down to the "Elephant." And even now the performances given at the +"Old Vic" are among the best in London for the purpose of seeing his +plays properly acted. What Southwark has done for the drama, she can +do for the other arts, by using this Institute as the instrument for +her energies. Why should we not be a centre for artistic enterprise—I +mean for our own art and our own enterprise, thought of<span class="pagenum" id="Page_65">[Pg 65]</span> by ourselves +and enjoyed by ourselves and carried through by ourselves? We shall not +always enjoy each others' creations, but the great point is to make our +own efforts. Of course all efforts require preparation and stimulus and +knowledge of what others are doing.</p> + +<p>At the present time—interrupted for the moment by the war—a great +revolution in the art of painting is in progress throughout the world. +Its centres are Paris and Italy and London and Munich, and its origin +in the far east, in China and Japan. There are two sides as in every +revolution, the Conservatives and the Revolutionists. Our own frescoes +in a neighbouring room represent an early stage of the movement in +London. Why should we not know all about it—obtain loans of pictures +which illustrate its phases and its cross currents, and compare these +with examples of the old style?</p> + +<p>But pictures are only one phase of art, and not the sort of art which +we ourselves can produce most easily. There are music, dancing, +recitation, literature, carving and modelling, and the various +decorative arts, such as embroidery, bookbinding, dress-making and +upholstery. This list, incomplete as it is, tells us two great +truths—you cannot separate art and recreation, and you cannot +separate art and business. The list includes items which we consider +as amusements, and items which we think of as business. We<span class="pagenum" id="Page_66">[Pg 66]</span> began with +dancing and ended with upholstery. Make them all beautiful.</p> + +<p>Beautiful things have dignity. Enjoy the rhythm of your dancing and +admire the beauty of your embroidery or your bookbinding. In whatever +you do, have an ideal of excellence. Any separation between art and +work is not only an error, but it is very bad business. Our brave +allies, the French, have made Paris the art centre of the world. They +have built up and maintain their large and lucrative trade in the +decorative products of France, mainly by reason of three qualities +which they possess. In the first place, they enjoy art themselves, and +reverence it. In the second place, they have a tremendous power of hard +work. And in the third place, every Frenchman, and still more every +Frenchwoman, have within them an immense fund of common sense. The +threefold secret is, Love of Art, Industry, and Common Sense.</p> + +<p>To make available our industry and common sense in the trades where +they are wanted, rigorous training in schools of design and technique +are necessary. We have such departments here. But all such training of +you will be a failure unless you yourselves enjoy art and beauty as +a natural recreation. A technical school of training is like a deep, +narrow well, sunk with careful labour to tap the underground river of +water which flows below the surface of our natures.<span class="pagenum" id="Page_67">[Pg 67]</span> But your well will +be dry unless the bright warm sun has first drawn up the vapour from +the wide ocean, and the free untrammelled breezes have carried the +clouds hither and thither, until at length they break, as it were by +chance over the distant hills and soak the land with their downpour.</p> + +<p>What I have said about art is a parable which applies to other +occupations and other studies. It is more than a parable; it is the +literal truth. The love of art is the love of excellence, it is the +enjoyment of the triumph of design over the shapeless products of +chance forces. An engineer, who is worth his salt, loves the beauty of +his machines, shown in their adjustment of parts and in their swift, +smooth motions. He loves also the sense of foresight and of insight +which knowledge can give him. People say that machinery and commerce +are driving beauty out of the modern world. I do not believe it. A new +beauty is being added, a more intellectual beauty, appealing to the +understanding as much as to the eye.</p> + +<p>The wonder of London ever takes the mind with fresh astonishment. The +city possesses parks, and palaces, and cathedrals. But no other parts +of it surpass in wonder its houses of business and its workshops and +its factories.</p> + +<p>In the next few years the future of the world will be decided for +centuries to come. The battles of this war are only the first part of +the contest<span class="pagenum" id="Page_68">[Pg 68]</span> between races, and between the ways of life for which +those races stand. We believe that England, with its various peoples +and communities scattered in islands and continents beyond the seas, +stands for ways of life infinitely precious, the way of humanity, the +way of liberty, the way of self-government, the way of good order based +on toleration and kindly feeling, the way of peaceful industry. The +final decision in this struggle will be found in the workshops of the +world. It lies in your hands. Statesmen and emperors will only register +the results which you have achieved. Your weapons will be skill, and +energy, and knowledge. You will require a sane understanding of your +own rights, and a sane understanding of the rights and the difficulties +of other classes. The greatness of England will be your greatness, and +its success your success.</p> + +<p>The arsenal for war is at Woolwich. This Polytechnic Institute is an +arsenal for peace, where you can find the weapons for the conquest of +your lives.</p> + + +<hr class="chap x-ebookmaker-drop"> + +<div class="chapter"> +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_69">[Pg 69]</span></p> + +<h2 class="nobreak" id="CHAPTER_IV">CHAPTER IV<br> +THE MATHEMATICAL CURRICULUM</h2> +</div> + +<p class="nindc space-below2"> +(<i>Presidential Address to the London Branch of the Mathematical +Association, 1912</i>)</p> + + +<p>THE situation in regard to education at the present time cannot find +its parallel without going back for some centuries to the break-up of +the mediæval traditions of learning. Then, as now, the traditional +intellectual outlook, despite the authority which it had justly +acquired from its notable triumphs, had grown to be too narrow for the +interests of mankind. The result of this shifting of human interest +was a demand for a parallel shifting of the basis of education, so +as to fit the pupils for the ideas which later in life would in fact +occupy their minds. Any serious fundamental change in the intellectual +outlook of human society must necessarily be followed by an educational +revolution. It may be delayed for a generation by vested interests or +by the passionate attachment of some leaders of thought to the cycle +of ideas within which they received their own mental stimulus at an +impressionable age. But the law is inexorable<span class="pagenum" id="Page_70">[Pg 70]</span> that education to be +living and effective must be directed to informing pupils with those +ideas, and to creating for them those capacities which will enable them +to appreciate the current thought of their epoch.</p> + +<p>There is no such thing as a successful system of education in a vacuum, +that is to say, a system which is divorced from immediate contact with +the existing intellectual atmosphere. Education which is not modern +shares the fate of all organic things which are kept too long.</p> + +<p>But the blessed word "modern" does not really solve our difficulties. +What we mean is, relevant to modern thought, either in the ideas +imparted or in the aptitudes produced. Something found out only +yesterday may not really be modern in this sense. It may belong to +some bygone system of thought prevalent in a previous age, or, what +is very much more likely, it may be too recondite. When we demand +that education should be relevant to modern thought, we are referring +to thoughts broadly spread throughout cultivated society. It is this +question of the unfitness of recondite subjects for use in general +education which I wish to make the keynote of my address this afternoon.</p> + +<p>It is in fact rather a delicate subject for us mathematicians. +Outsiders are apt to accuse our subject of being recondite. Let us +grasp<span class="pagenum" id="Page_71">[Pg 71]</span> the nettle at once and frankly admit that in general opinion it +is the very typical example of reconditeness. By this word I do not +mean difficulty, but that the ideas involved are of highly special +application, and rarely influence thought.</p> + +<p>This liability to reconditeness is the characteristic evil which is +apt to destroy the utility of mathematics in liberal education. So +far as it clings to the educational use of the subject, so far we +must acquiesce in a miserably low level of mathematical attainment +among cultivated people in general. I yield to no one in my anxiety to +increase the educational scope of mathematics. The way to achieve this +end is not by a mere blind demand for more mathematics. We must face +the real difficulty which obstructs its extended use.</p> + +<p>Is the subject recondite? Now, viewed as a whole, I think it is. +<i>Securus judicat orbis terrarum</i>—the general judgment of mankind +is sure.</p> + +<p>The subject as it exists in the minds and in the books of students of +mathematics <i>is</i> recondite. It proceeds by deducing innumerable +special results from general ideas, each result more recondite than the +preceding. It is not my task this afternoon to defend mathematics as a +subject for profound study. It can very well take care of itself. What +I want to<span class="pagenum" id="Page_72">[Pg 72]</span> emphasise is, that the very reasons which make this science +a delight to its students are reasons which obstruct its use as an +educational instrument—namely, the boundless wealth of deductions from +the interplay of general theorems, their complication, their apparent +remoteness from the ideas from which the argument started, the variety +of methods, and their purely abstract character which brings, as its +gift, eternal truth.</p> + +<p>Of course, all these characteristics are of priceless value to +students; for ages they have fascinated some of the keenest intellects. +My only remark is that, except for a highly selected class, they are +fatal in education. The pupils are bewildered by a multiplicity of +detail, without apparent relevance either to great ideas or to ordinary +thoughts. The extension of this sort of training in the direction +of acquiring more detail is the last measure to be desired in the +interests of education.</p> + +<p>The conclusion at which we arrive is, that mathematics, if it is +to be used in general education, must be subjected to a rigorous +process of selection and adaptation. I do not mean, what is of course +obvious, that however much time we devote to the subject the average +pupil will not get very far. But that, however limited the progress, +certain characteristics of the subject, natural at any stage, must be +rigorously excluded. The science as presented to young<span class="pagenum" id="Page_73">[Pg 73]</span> pupils must +lose its aspect of reconditeness. It must, on the face of it, deal +directly and simply with a few general ideas of far-reaching importance.</p> + +<p>Now, in this matter of the reform of mathematical instruction, the +present generation of teachers may take a very legitimate pride in +its achievements. It has shown immense energy in reform, and has +accomplished more than would have been thought possible in so short a +time. It is not always recognised how difficult is the task of changing +a well-established curriculum entrenched behind public examinations.</p> + +<p>But for all that, great progress has been made, and, to put the matter +at its lowest, the old dead tradition has been broken up. I want to +indicate this afternoon the guiding idea which should direct our +efforts at reconstruction. I have already summed it up in a phrase, +namely, we must aim at the elimination of reconditeness from the +educational use of the subject.</p> + +<p>Our courses of instruction should be planned to illustrate simply a +succession of ideas of obvious importance. All pretty divagations +should be rigorously excluded. The goal to be aimed at is that the +pupil should acquire familiarity with abstract thought, should realise +how it applies to particular concrete circumstances, and should know +how to apply general methods to its logical investigation. With this +educational<span class="pagenum" id="Page_74">[Pg 74]</span> ideal nothing can be worse than the aimless accretion +of theorems in our text-books, which acquire their position merely +because the children can be made to learn them and examiners can set +neat questions on them. The bookwork to be learnt should all be very +important as illustrating ideas. The examples set—and let there +be as many examples as teachers find necessary—should be direct +illustrations of the theorems, either by way of abstract particular +cases or by way of application to concrete phenomena. Here it is worth +remarking that it is quite useless to simplify the bookwork, if the +examples set in examinations in fact require an extended knowledge of +recondite details. There is a mistaken idea that problems test ability +and genius, and that bookwork tests cram. This is not my experience. +Only boys who have been specially crammed for scholarships can ever +do a problem paper successfully. Bookwork properly set, not in mere +snippets according to the usual bad plan, is a far better test of +ability, provided that it is supplemented by direct examples. But this +is a digression on the bad influence of examinations on teaching.</p> + +<p>The main ideas which lie at the base of mathematics are not at all +recondite. They are abstract. But one of the main objects of the +inclusion of mathematics in a liberal education is to train the pupils +to handle abstract ideas.<span class="pagenum" id="Page_75">[Pg 75]</span> The science constitutes the first large +group of abstract ideas which naturally occur to the mind in any +precise form. For the purposes of education, mathematics consists of +the relations of number, the relations of quantity, and the relations +of space. This is not a general definition of mathematics, which, in +my opinion, is a much more general science. But we are now discussing +the use of mathematics in education. These three groups of relations, +concerning number, quantity, and space, are interconnected.</p> + +<p>Now, in education we proceed from the particular to the general. +Accordingly, children should be taught the use of these ideas by +practice among simple examples. My point is this: The goal should be, +not an aimless accumulation of special mathematical theorems, but the +final recognition that the preceding years of work have illustrated +those relations of number, and of quantity, and of space, which are of +fundamental importance. Such a training should lie at the base of all +philosophical thought. In fact elementary mathematics rightly conceived +would give just that philosophical discipline of which the ordinary +mind is capable. But what at all costs we ought to avoid, is the +pointless accumulation of details. As many examples as you like; let +the children work at them for terms, or for years. But these examples +should be direct illustrations of the main ideas. In this<span class="pagenum" id="Page_76">[Pg 76]</span> way, and +this only, can the fatal reconditeness be avoided.</p> + +<p>I am not now speaking in particular of those who are to be professional +mathematicians, or of those who for professional reasons require a +knowledge of certain mathematical details. We are considering the +liberal education of all students, including these two classes. This +general use of mathematics should be the simple study of a few general +truths, well illustrated by practical examples. This study should +be conceived by itself, and completely separated in idea from the +professional study mentioned above, for which it would make a most +excellent preparation. Its final stage should be the recognition of +the general truths which the work done has illustrated. As far as I +can make out, at present the final stage is the proof of some property +of circles connected with triangles. Such properties are immensely +interesting to mathematicians. But are they not rather recondite, +and what is the precise relation of such theorems to the ideal of +a liberal education? The end of all the grammatical studies of the +student in classics is to read Virgil and Horace—the greatest thoughts +of the greatest men. Are we content, when pleading for the adequate +representation in education of our own science, to say that the end of +a mathematical training is that the student should know the properties +of the nine-point<span class="pagenum" id="Page_77">[Pg 77]</span> circle? I ask you frankly, is it not rather a "come +down"?</p> + +<p>This generation of mathematical teachers has done so much strenuous +work in the way of reorganising mathematical instruction that there is +no need to despair of its being able to elaborate a curriculum which +shall leave in the minds of the pupils something even nobler than "the +ambiguous case."</p> + +<p>Let us think how this final review, closing the elementary course, +might be conducted for the more intelligent pupils. Partly no doubt +it requires a general oversight of the whole work done, considered +without undue detail so as to emphasise the general ideas used, and +their possibilities of importance when subjected to further study. Also +the analytical and geometrical ideas find immediate application in the +physical laboratory where a course of simple experimental mechanics +should have been worked through. Here the point of view is twofold, the +physical ideas and the mathematical ideas illustrate each other.</p> + +<p>The mathematical ideas are essential to the precise formulation of the +mechanical laws. The idea of a precise law of nature, the extent to +which such laws are in fact verified in our experience, and the rôle of +abstract thought in their formulation, then become practically apparent +to the pupil. The whole topic of course<span class="pagenum" id="Page_78">[Pg 78]</span> requires detailed development +with full particular illustration, and is not suggested as requiring +merely a few bare abstract statements.</p> + +<p>It would, however, be a grave error to put too much emphasis on the +mere process of direct explanation of the previous work by way of +final review. My point is, that the latter end of the course should +be so selected that in fact the general ideas underlying all the +previous mathematical work should be brought into prominence. This may +well be done by apparently entering on a new subject. For example, +the ideas of quantity and the ideas of number are fundamental to +all precise thought. In the previous stages they will not have been +sharply separated; and children are, rightly enough, pushed on to +algebra without too much bother and quantity. But the more intelligent +among them at the end of their curriculum would gain immensely by a +careful consideration of those fundamental properties of quantity in +general which lead to the introduction of numerical measurement. This +is a topic which also has the advantage that the necessary books are +actually to hand. Euclid's fifth book is regarded by those qualified +to judge as one of the triumphs of Greek mathematics. It deals with +this very point. Nothing can be more characteristic of the hopelessly +illiberal character of the traditional mathematical education than the +fact that this<span class="pagenum" id="Page_79">[Pg 79]</span> book has always been omitted. It deals with ideas, +and therefore was ostracised. Of course a careful selection of the +more important propositions and a careful revision of the argument are +required. This also is to hand in the publications of my immediate +predecessor in the office of president, Prof. Hill. Furthermore, in Sir +T. L. Heath's complete edition of Euclid, there is a full commentary +embodying most of what has been said and thought on the point. Thus +it is perfectly easy for teachers to inform themselves generally +on the topic. The whole book would not be wanted, but just the few +propositions which embody the fundamental ideas. The subject is not +fit for backward pupils; but certainly it could be made interesting to +the more advanced class. There would be great scope for interesting +discussion as to the nature of quantity, and the tests which we should +apply to ascertain when we are dealing with quantities. The work +would not be at all in the air, but would be illustrated at every +stage by reference to actual examples of cases where the quantitative +character is absent, or obscure, or doubtful, or evident. Temperature, +heat, electricity, pleasure and pain, mass and distance could all be +considered.</p> + +<p>Another idea which requires illustration is that of functionality. +A function in analysis is the counterpart of a law in the physical +universe,<span class="pagenum" id="Page_80">[Pg 80]</span> and of a curve in geometry. Children have studied the +relations of functions to curves from the first beginning of their +study of algebra, namely in drawing graphs. Of recent years there has +been a great reform in respect to graphs. But at its present stage it +has either gone too far or not far enough. It is not enough merely +to draw a graph. The idea behind the graph—like the man behind the +gun—is essential in order to make it effective. At present there is +some tendency merely to set the children to draw curves, and there to +leave the whole question.</p> + +<p>In the study of simple algebraic functions and of trigonometrical +functions we are initiating the study of the precise expression of +physical laws. Curves are another way of representing these laws. The +simple fundamental laws—such as the inverse square and the direct +distance—should be passed under review, and the applications of the +simple functions to express important concrete cases of physical laws +considered. I cannot help thinking that the final review of this topic +might well take the form of a study of some of the main ideas of the +differential calculus applied to simple curves. There is nothing +particularly difficult about the conception of a rate of change; and +the differentiation of a few powers of <i>x</i>, such as <i>x</i><sup>2</sup>, +<i>x</i><sup>3</sup>, etc., could easily be effected; perhaps by the aid of +geometry<span class="pagenum" id="Page_81">[Pg 81]</span> even sin <i>x</i> and cos <i>x</i> could be differentiated. +If we once abandon our fatal habit of cramming the children with +theorems which they do not understand, and will never use, there will +be plenty of time to concentrate their attention on really important +topics. We can give them familiarity with conceptions which really +influence thought.</p> + +<p>Before leaving this topic of physical laws and mathematical functions, +there are other points to be noticed. The fact that the precise law is +never really verified by observation in its full precision is capable +of easy illustration and of affording excellent examples. Again, +statistical laws, namely laws which are only satisfied on the average +by large numbers, can easily be studied and illustrated. In fact a +slight study of statistical methods and their application to social +phenomena affords one of the simplest examples of the application of +algebraic ideas.</p> + +<p>Another way in which the students' ideas can be generalised is by the +use of the History of Mathematics, conceived not as a mere assemblage +of the dates and names of men, but as an exposition of the general +current of thought which occasioned the subjects to be objects of +interest at the time of their first elaboration. The use of the History +of Mathematics is to be considered at a later stage of our proceedings +this afternoon. Accordingly I merely draw attention<span class="pagenum" id="Page_82">[Pg 82]</span> to it now, to +point out that perhaps it is the very subject which may best obtain the +results for which I am pleading.</p> + +<p>We have indicated two main topics, namely general ideas of quantity +and of laws of nature, which should be an object of study in the +mathematical curriculum of a liberal education. But there is another +side to mathematics which must not be overlooked. It is the chief +instrument for discipline in logical method.</p> + +<p>Now, what is logical method, and how can any one be trained in it?</p> + +<p>Logical method is more than the mere knowledge of valid types of +reasoning and practice in the concentration of mind necessary to +follow them. If it were only this, it would still be very important; +for the human mind was not evolved in the bygone ages for the sake of +reasoning, but merely to enable mankind with more art to hunt between +meals for fresh food supplies. Accordingly few people can follow close +reasoning without considerable practice.</p> + +<p>More than this is wanted to make a good reasoner, or even to enlighten +ordinary people with knowledge of what constitutes the essence of the +art. The art of reasoning consists in getting hold of the subject at +the right end, of seizing on the few general ideas which illuminate +the whole, and of persistently marshalling all subsidiary facts round +them. Nobody can be a<span class="pagenum" id="Page_83">[Pg 83]</span> good reasoner unless by constant practice he +has realised the importance of getting hold of the big ideas and of +hanging on to them like grim death. For this sort of training geometry +is, I think, better than algebra. The field of thought of algebra is +rather obscure, whereas space is an obvious insistent thing evident to +all. Then the process of simplification, or abstraction, by which all +irrelevant properties of matter, such as colour, taste, and weight, are +put aside is an education in itself. Again, the definitions and the +propositions assumed without proof illustrate the necessity of forming +clear notions of the fundamental facts of the subject-matter and of the +relations between them. All this belongs to the mere prolegomena of the +subject. When we come to its development, its excellence increases. The +learner is not initially confronted with any symbolism which bothers +the memory by its rules, however simple they may be. Also, from the +very beginning the reasoning, if properly conducted, is dominated by +well-marked ideas which guide each stage of development. Accordingly +the essence of logical method receives immediate exemplification.</p> + +<p>Let us now put aside for the moment the limitations introduced by +the dullness of average pupils and the pressure on time due to other +subjects, and consider what geometry has to offer in the way of a +liberal education. I<span class="pagenum" id="Page_84">[Pg 84]</span> will indicate some stages in the subject, +without meaning that necessarily they are to be studied in this +exclusive order. The first stage is the study of <i>congruence</i>. +Our perception of congruence is in practice dependent on our judgments +of the invariability of the intrinsic properties of bodies when their +external circumstances are varying. But however it arises, congruence +is in essence the correlation of two regions of space, point by point, +so that all homologous distances and all homologous angles are equal. +It is to be noticed that the definition of the equality of lengths and +angles is their congruence, and all tests of equality, such as the use +of the yard measure, are merely devices for making immediate judgments +of congruence easy. I make these remarks to suggest that apart from the +reasoning connected with it, congruence, both as an example of a larger +and very far-reaching idea and also for its own sake, is well worthy +of attentive consideration. The propositions concerning it elucidate +the elementary properties of the triangle, the parallelogram, and the +circle, and of the relations of two planes to each other. It is very +desirable to restrict the proved propositions of this part within the +narrowest bounds, partly by assuming redundant axiomatic propositions, +and partly by introducing only those propositions of absolutely +fundamental importance.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_85">[Pg 85]</span></p> + +<p>The second stage is the study of similarity. This can be reduced to +three or four fundamental propositions. Similarity is an enlargement of +the idea of congruence, and, like that idea, is another example of a +one-to-one correlation of points of spaces. Any extension of study of +this subject might well be in the direction of the investigation of one +or two simple properties of similar and similarly situated rectilinear +figures. The whole subject receives its immediate applications in plans +and maps. It is important, however, to remember that trigonometry is +really the method by which the main theorems are made available for use.</p> + +<p>The third stage is the study of the elements of trigonometry. This is +the study of the periodicity introduced by rotation and of properties +preserved in a correlation of similar figures. Here for the first time +we introduce a slight use of the algebraic analysis founded on the +study of number and quantity. The importance of the periodic character +of the functions requires full illustration. The simplest properties of +the functions are the only ones required for the solution of triangles, +and the consequent applications to surveying. The wealth of formulæ, +often important in themselves, but entirely useless for this type of +study, which crowd our books should be rigorously excluded, except +so far as they are capable of<span class="pagenum" id="Page_86">[Pg 86]</span> being proved by the pupils as direct +examples of the bookwork.</p> + +<p>This question of the exclusion of formulæ is best illustrated by +considering this example of Trigonometry, though of course I may well +have hit on an unfortunate case in which my judgment is at fault. A +great part of the educational advantage of the subject can be obtained +by confining study to Trigonometry of one angle and by exclusion of the +addition formulæ for the sine and cosine of the sum of two angles. The +functions can be graphed, and the solution of triangles effected. Thus +the aspects of the science as (1) embodying analytically the immediate +results of some of the theorems deduced from congruence and similarity, +(2) as a solution of the main problem of surveying, (3) as a study of +the fundamental functions required to express periodicity and wave +motion, will all be impressed on the pupils' minds both by bookwork and +example.</p> + +<p>If it be desired to extend this course, the addition formulæ should +be added. But great care should be taken to exclude specialising +the pupils in the wealth of formulæ which comes in their train. By +"exclude" is meant that the pupils should not have spent time or energy +in acquiring any facility in their deduction. The teacher may find +it interesting to work a few such examples before a class. But such<span class="pagenum" id="Page_87">[Pg 87]</span> +results are not among those which learners need retain. Also, I would +exclude the whole subject of circumscribed and inscribed circles both +from Trigonometry and from the previous geometrical courses. It is +all very pretty, but I do not understand what its function is in an +elementary non-professional curriculum.</p> + +<p>Accordingly, the actual bookwork of the subject is reduced to very +manageable proportions. I was told the other day of an American college +where the students are expected to know by heart ninety formulæ or +results in Trigonometry alone. We are not quite so bad as that. In +fact, in Trigonometry we have nearly approached the ideal here sketched +out as far as our elementary courses are concerned.</p> + +<p>The fourth stage introduces Analytical Geometry. The study of graphs in +algebra has already employed the fundamental notions, and all that is +now required is a rigorously pruned course on the straight line, the +circle, and the three types of conic sections, defined by the forms of +their equations. At this point there are two remarks to be made. It is +often desirable to give our pupils mathematical information which we do +not prove. For example, in co-ordinate geometry, the reduction of the +general equation of the second degree is probably beyond the capacities +of most of the type of students whom we are considering. But that need +not<span class="pagenum" id="Page_88">[Pg 88]</span> prevent us from explaining the fundamental position of conics, as +exhausting the possible types of such curves.</p> + +<p>The second remark is to advocate the entire sweeping away of +geometrical conics as a separate subject. Naturally, on suitable +occasions the analysis of analytical geometry will be lightened by +the use of direct deduction from some simple figure. But geometrical +conics, as developed from the definition of a conic section by the +focus and directrix property, suffers from glaring defects. It is +hopelessly recondite. The fundamental definition of a conic, <i>SP</i> += <i>e</i> · <i>PM</i>, usual in this subject at this stage, is +thoroughly bad. It is very recondite, and has no obvious importance. +Why should such curves be studied at all, any more than those defined +by an indefinite number of other formulæ? But when we have commenced +the study of the Cartesian methods, the equations of the first and +second degrees are naturally the first things to think about.</p> + +<p>In this ideal course of Geometry, the fifth stage is occupied with +the elements of Projective Geometry. The general ideas of cross ratio +and of projection are here fundamental. Projection is yet a more +general instance of that one-to-one correlation which we have already +considered under congruence and similarity. Here again we must avoid +the danger of being led into a bewildering wealth of detail.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_89">[Pg 89]</span></p> + +<p>The intellectual idea which projective geometry is to illustrate is +the importance in reasoning of the correlation of all cases which +can be proved to possess in common certain identical properties. The +preservation of the projective properties in projection is the one +important educational idea of the subject. Cross ratio only enters +as the fundamental metrical property which is preserved. The few +propositions considered are selected to illustrate the two allied +processes which are made possible by this procedure. One is proof +by simplification. Here the simplification is psychological and not +logical—for the general case is logically the simplest. What is meant +is: Proof by considering the case which is in fact the most familiar to +us, or the easiest to think about. The other procedure is the deduction +of particular cases from known general truths, as soon as we have a +means of discovering such cases or a criterion for testing them.</p> + +<p>The projective definition of conic sections and the identity of the +results obtained with the curves derived from the general equation +of the second degree are capable of simple exposition, but lie on +the border-line of the subject. It is the sort of topic on which +information can be given, and the proofs suppressed.</p> + +<p>The course of geometry as here conceived in its complete ideal—and +ideals can never be realised—is not a long one. The actual amount<span class="pagenum" id="Page_90">[Pg 90]</span> +of mathematical deduction at each stage in the form of bookwork is +very slight. But much more explanation would be given, the importance +of each proposition being illustrated by examples, either worked out +or for students to work, so selected as to indicate the fields of +thought to which it applies. By such a course the student would gain an +analysis of the leading properties of space, and of the chief methods +by which they are investigated.</p> + +<p>The study of the elements of mathematics, conceived in this spirit, +would constitute a training in logical method together with an +acquisition of the precise ideas which lie at the base of the +scientific and philosophical investigations of the universe. Would it +be easy to continue the excellent reforms in mathematical instruction +which this generation has already achieved, so as to include in the +curriculum this wider and more philosophic spirit? Frankly, I think +that this result would be very hard to achieve as the result of +single individual efforts. For reasons which I have already briefly +indicated, all reforms in education are very difficult to effect. But +the continued pressure of combined effort, provided that the ideal is +really present in the minds of the mass of teachers, can do much, and +effects in the end surprising modification. Gradually the requisite +books get written, still more gradually the examinations are reformed<span class="pagenum" id="Page_91">[Pg 91]</span> +so as to give weight to the less technical aspects of the subject, and +then all recent experience has shown that the majority of teachers are +only too ready to welcome any practicable means of rescuing the subject +from the reproach of being a mechanical discipline.</p> + + +<hr class="chap x-ebookmaker-drop"> + +<div class="chapter"> +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_92">[Pg 92]</span></p> + +<h2 class="nobreak" id="CHAPTER_V">CHAPTER V<br> +THE PRINCIPLES OF MATHEMATICS IN RELATION TO ELEMENTARY TEACHING</h2> +</div> + +<p class="nindc space-below2"> +(<i>International Congress of Mathematicians, Cambridge, August, +1912</i>)</p> + + +<p>WE are concerned not with the advanced teaching of a few specialist +mathematical students, but with the mathematical education of the +majority of boys in our secondary schools. Again these boys must be +divided into two sections: one section consists of those who desire to +restrict their mathematical education; the other section is made up of +those who will require some mathematical training for their subsequent +professional careers, either in the form of definite mathematical +results or in the form of mathematically trained minds.</p> + +<p>I shall call the latter of these two sections the mathematical section, +and the former the non-mathematical section. But I must repeat that by +the mathematical section is meant that large number of boys who desire +to learn more than the minimum amount of mathematics. Furthermore, most +of my remarks about these sections of boys<span class="pagenum" id="Page_93">[Pg 93]</span> apply also to elementary +classes of our University students.</p> + +<p>The subject of this paper is the investigation of the place which +should be occupied by modern investigations respecting mathematical +principles in the education of both of these sections of school-boys.</p> + +<p>To find a foothold from which to start the inquiry, let us ask why the +non-mathematical section should be taught any mathematics at all beyond +the barest elements of arithmetic. What are the qualities of mind which +a mathematical training is designed to produce when it is employed as +an element in a liberal education?</p> + +<p>My answer, which applies equally to both sections of students, is +that there are two allied forms of mental discipline which should be +acquired by a well-designed mathematical course. These two forms though +closely allied are perfectly distinct.</p> + +<p>The first form of discipline is not in its essence logical at all. +It is the power of clearly grasping abstract ideas, and of relating +them to particular circumstances. In other words, the first use of +mathematics is to strengthen the power of abstract thought. I repeat +that in its essence this has nothing to do with logic, though as a +matter of fact a logical discipline is the best method of producing the +desired effect. It is not the philosophical theory of abstract ideas +which is to be<span class="pagenum" id="Page_94">[Pg 94]</span> acquired, but the habit and the power of using them. +There is one and only way of acquiring the habit and the power of using +anything, that is by the simple common-place method of habitually using +it. There is no other short cut. If in education we desire to produce +a certain conformation of mind, we must day by day, and year by year, +accustom the students' minds to grow into the desired structural shape. +Thus to teach the power of grasping abstract ideas and the habit of +using them, we must select a group of such ideas, which are important +and are also easy to think about because they are clear and definite.</p> + +<p>The fundamental mathematical truths concerning geometry, ratio, +quantity, and number, satisfy these conditions as do no others. Hence, +the fundamental universal position held by mathematics as an element of +a liberal education.</p> + +<p>But what are the fundamental mathematical truths concerning geometry, +quantity and number?</p> + +<p>At this point we come to the great question of the relation between +the modern science of the principles of mathematics and a mathematical +education.</p> + +<p>My answer to the question as to these fundamental mathematical truths +is, that in any absolute sense there are none. There is no unique +small body of independent primitive unproved propositions which are +the necessary starting<span class="pagenum" id="Page_95">[Pg 95]</span> points of all mathematical reasoning on these +subjects. In mathematical reasoning the only absolute necessary +pre-suppositions are those which make logical deduction possible. +Between these absolute logical truths and so-called fundamental truths +concerning geometry, quantity and number, there is a whole new world of +mathematical subjects concerning the logic of propositions, of classes, +and of relations.</p> + +<p>But this subject is too abstract to form an elementary training ground +in the difficult art of abstract thought.</p> + +<p>It is for this reason that we have to make a compromise and start from +such obvious general ideas as naturally occur to all men when they +perceive objects with their senses.</p> + +<p>In geometry, the ideas elaborated by the Greeks and presented by Euclid +are, roughly speaking, those adapted for our purpose, namely, ideas +of volumes, surfaces, lines, of straightness and of curvature, of +intersection and of congruence, of greater and less, of similarity, +shape, and scale. In fact, we use in education those general ideas of +spatial properties which must be habitually present in the mind of any +one who is to observe the world of phenomena with understanding.</p> + +<p>Thus we come back to Plato's opinion that for a liberal education, +geometry, as he knew it, is the queen of sciences.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_96">[Pg 96]</span></p> + +<p>In addition to geometry, there remain the ideas of quantity, ratio, +and of number. This in practice means, elementary algebra. Here the +prominent ideas are those of "any number," in other words, the use +of the familiar <i>x</i>, <i>y</i>, <i>z</i>, and of the dependence +of variables on each other, or otherwise, the idea of functionality. +All this is to be gradually acquired by the continual use of the +very simplest functions which we can devise: of linear functions, +graphically represented by straight lines; of quadratic functions, +graphically represented by parabolas; and of those simple implicit +functions, graphically represented by conic sections. Thence, with good +fortune and a willing class, we can advance to the ideas of rates of +increase, still confining ourselves to the simplest possible cases.</p> + +<p>I wish here emphatically to remind you that both in geometry and in +algebra a clear grasp of these general ideas is not what the pupil +starts from, it is the goal at which he is to arrive. The method of +progression is continual practice in the consideration of the simplest +particular cases, and the goal is not philosophical analysis but the +power of use.</p> + +<p>But how is he to practise himself in their use? He cannot simply sit +down and think of the relation <i>y</i> = <i>x</i> + 1, he must employ +it in some simple obvious way.</p> + +<p>This brings us to the second power of mind<span class="pagenum" id="Page_97">[Pg 97]</span> which is to be produced by +a mathematical training, namely, the power of logical reasoning. Here +again, it is not the knowledge of the philosophy of logic which it is +essential to teach, but the habit of thinking logically. By logic, I +mean deductive logic.</p> + +<p>Deductive logic is the science of certain relations, such as +implication, etc., between general ideas. When logic begins, definite +particular individual things have been banished. I cannot relate +logically this thing to that thing, for example this pen to that pen, +except by the indirect way of relating some general idea which applies +to this pen to some general idea which applies to that pen. And the +individualities of the two pens are quite irrelevant to the logical +process. This process is entirely concerned with the two general ideas. +Thus the practice of logic is a certain way of employing the mind +in the consideration of such ideas; and an elementary mathematical +training is in fact nothing else but the logical use of the general +ideas respecting geometry and algebra which we have enumerated above. +It has therefore, as I started this paper by stating, a double +advantage. It makes the mind capable of abstract thought, and it +achieves this object by training the mind in the most important kind of +abstract thought, namely, deductive logic.</p> + +<p>I may remind you that other choices of a type<span class="pagenum" id="Page_98">[Pg 98]</span> of abstract thought +might be made. We might train the children to contemplate directly the +beauty of abstract moral ideas, in the hope of making them religious +mystics. The general practice of education has decided in favour of +logic, as exemplified in elementary mathematics.</p> + +<p>We have now to answer the further question, what is the rôle of +logical precision in the teaching of mathematics? Our general answer +to the implied question is obvious: logical precision is one of the +two objects of the teaching of mathematics, and it is the only weapon +by which the teaching of mathematics can achieve its other object. To +teach mathematics is to teach logical precision. A mathematical teacher +who has not taught that has taught nothing.</p> + +<p>But having stated this thesis in this unqualified way, its meaning must +be carefully explained; for otherwise its real bearing on the problem +will be entirely misunderstood.</p> + +<p>Logical precision is the faculty to be acquired. It is the quality of +mind which it is the object of the teaching to impart. Thus the habit +of reading great literature is the goal at which a literary education +aims. But we do not expect a child to start its first lesson by reading +for itself Shakespeare. We recognise that reading is impossible till +the pupil has learnt its alphabet and can spell, and then we start it +with books of one syllable.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_99">[Pg 99]</span></p> + +<p>In the same way, a mathematical education should grow in logical +precision. It is folly to expect the same careful logical analysis at +the commencement of the training as would be appropriate at the end. +It is an entire misconception of my thesis to construe it as meaning +that a mathematical training should assume in the pupil a power of +concentrated logical thought. My thesis is in fact the exact opposite, +namely, that this power cannot be assumed, and has got to be acquired, +and that a mathematical training is nothing else than the process of +acquiring it. My whole groundwork of assumption is that this power does +not initially exist in a fully developed state. Of course like every +other power which is acquired, it must be developed gradually.</p> + +<p>The various stages of development must be guided by the judgment and +the genius of the teacher. But what is essential is, that the teacher +should keep clearly in his mind that it is just this power of logical +precise reasoning which is the whole object of his efforts. If his +pupils have in any measure gained this, they have gained all.</p> + +<p>We have not yet, however, fully considered this part of our subject. +Logical precision is the full realisation of the steps of the argument. +But what are the steps of the argument? The full statement of all the +steps is far too elaborate and difficult an operation to be introduced +into the mathematical reasoning of an educational<span class="pagenum" id="Page_100">[Pg 100]</span> curriculum. Such a +statement involves the introduction of abstract logical ideas which +are very difficult to grasp, because there is so rarely any need to +make them explicit in ordinary thought. They are therefore not a fit +subject-ground for an elementary education.</p> + +<p>I do not think that it is possible to draw any theoretical line +between those logical steps which form a theoretically full logical +investigation, and those which are full enough for most practical +purposes, including that of education. The question is one of +psychology, to be solved by a process of experiment. The object to be +attained is to gain that amount of logical alertness which will enable +its possessors to detect fallacy and to know the types of sound logical +deduction. The objects of going further are partly philosophical, and +also partly to lay bare abstract ideas whose investigation is in itself +important. But both these objects are foreign to education.</p> + +<p>My opinion is, that, on the whole, the type of logical precision handed +down to us by the Greek mathematicians is, roughly speaking, what we +want. In geometry, this means the sort of precision which we find in +Euclid. I do not mean that we should use his famous <i>Elements</i> as +a text-book, nor that here and there a certain compression in his mode +of exposition is not advisable. All this is mere detail. What I do mean +is, that the sort of logical transition which he made<span class="pagenum" id="Page_101">[Pg 101]</span> explicit, we +should make explicit, and that the sort of transition which he omits, +we should omit.</p> + +<p>I doubt, however, whether it is desirable to plunge the student into +the full rigour of euclidean geometry without some mitigation. It is +for this reason that the modern habit, at least in England, of laying +great stress in the initial stages on training the pupil in simple +constructions from numerical data is to be praised. It means that after +a slight amount of reasoning on the euclidean basis of accuracy, the +mind of the learner is relieved by doing the things in various special +cases, and noting by rough measurements that the desired results are +actually attained. It is important, however, that the measurements +be not mistaken for the proofs. Their object is to make the beginner +apprehend what the abstract ideas really mean.</p> + +<p>Again in algebra, the notation and the practical use of the symbols +should be acquired in the simplest cases, and the more theoretical +treatment of the symbolism reserved to a suitable later stage. My +rule would be initially to learn the meaning of the ideas by a crude +practice in simple ways, and to refine the logical procedure in +preparation for an advance to greater generality. In fact the thesis of +my paper can be put in another way thus, the object of a mathematical +education is, to acquire the powers<span class="pagenum" id="Page_102">[Pg 102]</span> of analysis, of generalisation, +and of reasoning. The two processes of analysis and generalisation were +in my previous statement put together as the power of grasping abstract +ideas.</p> + +<p>But in order to analyse and to generalise, we must commence with the +crude material of ideas which are to be analysed and generalised. +Accordingly it is a positive error in education to start with the +ultimate products of this process, namely the ideas in their refined +analysed and generalised forms. We are thereby skipping an important +part of the training, which is to take the ideas as they actually exist +in the child's mind, and to exercise the child in the difficult art of +civilising them and clothing them.</p> + +<p>The schoolmaster is in fact a missionary, the savages are the ideas in +the child's mind; and the missionary shirks his main task if he refuse +to risk his body among the cannibals.</p> + +<p>At this point I should like to turn your attention to those pupils +forming the mathematical section. There is an idea, widely prevalent, +that it is possible to teach mathematics of a relatively advanced +type—such as differential calculus, for instance—in a way useful to +physicists and engineers without any attention to its logic or its +theory.</p> + +<p>This seems to me to be a profound mistake. It implies that a merely +mechanical knowledge without understanding of ways of arriving at<span class="pagenum" id="Page_103">[Pg 103]</span> +mathematical results is useful in applied science. It is of no use +whatever. The results themselves can all be found stated in the +appropriate pocket books and in other elementary works of reference. No +one when applying a result need bother himself as to why it is true. He +accepts it and applies it. What is of supreme importance in physics and +in engineering is a mathematically trained mind, and such a mind can +only be acquired by a proper mathematical discipline.</p> + +<p>I fully admit that the proper way to start such a subject as the +differential calculus is to plunge quickly into the use of the notation +in a few absurdly simple cases, with a crude explanation of the idea +of rates of increase. The notation as thus known can then be used by +the lecturers in the Physical and Engineering Laboratories. But the +mathematical training of the applied scientists consists in making +these ideas precise and the proofs accurate.</p> + +<p>I hope that the thesis of this paper respecting the position of logical +precision in the teaching of mathematics has been rendered plain. The +habit of logical precision with its necessary concentration of thought +upon abstract ideas is not wholly possible in the initial stages of +learning. It is the ideal at which the teacher should aim. Also logical +precision, in the sense of logical explicitness, is not an absolute +thing: it is an affair of more or less. Accordingly the quantity<span class="pagenum" id="Page_104">[Pg 104]</span> of +explicitness to be introduced at each stage of progress must depend +upon the practical judgment of the teacher. Lastly, in a sense, the +instructed mind is less explicit; for it travels more quickly over a +well-remembered path, and may save the trouble of putting into words +trains of thought which are very obvious to it. But on the other +hand it atones for this rapidity by a concentration on every subtle +point where a fallacy can lurk. The habit of logical precision is the +instinct for the subtle difficulty.</p> + + +<hr class="chap x-ebookmaker-drop"> + +<div class="chapter"> +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_105">[Pg 105]</span></p> + +<h2 class="nobreak" id="CHAPTER_VI">CHAPTER VI<br> +THE ORGANISATION OF THOUGHT</h2> +</div> + +<p class="nindc space-below2"> +(<i>Presidential Address to Section A, British Association, Newcastle, +1916</i>)</p> + + +<p>THE subject of this address is the organisation of thought, a topic +evidently capable of many diverse modes of treatment. I intend more +particularly to give some account of that department of logical science +with which some of my own studies have been connected. But I am +anxious, if I can succeed in so doing, to handle this account so as to +exhibit the relation with certain considerations which underlie general +scientific activities.</p> + +<p>It is no accident that an age of science has developed into an age +of organisation. Organised thought is the basis of organised action. +Organisation is the adjustment of diverse elements so that their +mutual relations may exhibit some predetermined quality. An epic poem +is a triumph of organisation, that is to say, it is a triumph in the +unlikely event of its being a good epic poem. It is the successful +organisation of multitudinous sounds of words, associations of<span class="pagenum" id="Page_106">[Pg 106]</span> words, +pictorial memories of diverse events and feelings ordinarily occurring +in life, combined with a special narrative of great events: the whole +so disposed as to excite emotions which, as defined by Milton, are +simple, sensuous, and passionate. The number of successful epic poems +is commensurate, or rather, is inversely commensurate, with the obvious +difficulty of the task of organisation.</p> + +<p>Science is the organisation of thought. But the example of the epic +poem warns us that science is not any organisation of thought. It is +an organisation of a certain definite type which we will endeavour to +determine.</p> + +<p>Science is a river with two sources, the practical source and the +theoretical source. The practical source is the desire to direct our +actions to achieve predetermined ends. For example, the British nation, +fighting for justice, turns to science, which teaches it the importance +of compounds of nitrogen. The theoretical source is the desire to +understand. Now I am going to emphasise the importance of theory in +science. But to avoid misconception I most emphatically state that I +do not consider one source as in any sense nobler than the other, or +intrinsically more interesting. I cannot see why it is nobler to strive +to understand than to busy oneself with the right ordering of one's +actions. Both have their bad sides; there are evil ends directing<span class="pagenum" id="Page_107">[Pg 107]</span> +actions, and there are ignoble curiosities of the understanding.</p> + +<p>The importance, even in practice, of the theoretical side of science +arises from the fact that action must be immediate, and takes place +under circumstances which are excessively complicated. If we wait for +the necessities of action before we commence to arrange our ideas, in +peace we shall have lost our trade, and in war we shall have lost the +battle. Success in practice depends on theorists who, led by other +motives of exploration, have been there before, and by some good chance +have hit upon the relevant ideas. By a theorist I do not mean a man who +is up in the clouds, but a man whose motive for thought is the desire +to formulate correctly the rules according to which events occur. A +successful theorist should be excessively interested in immediate +events, otherwise he is not at all likely to formulate correctly +anything about them. Of course, both sources of science exist in all +men.</p> + +<p>Now, what is this thought organisation which we call science? The +first aspect of modern science which struck thoughtful observers was +its inductive character. The nature of induction, its importance, and +the rules of inductive logic have been considered by a long series of +thinkers, especially English thinkers: Bacon, Herschel, J. S. Mill, +Venn, Jevons, and others. I am not going to plunge into an analysis +of the<span class="pagenum" id="Page_108">[Pg 108]</span> process of induction. Induction is the machinery and not the +product, and it is the product which I want to consider. When we +understand the product we shall be in a stronger position to improve +the machinery.</p> + +<p>First, there is one point which it is necessary to emphasise. There +is a tendency in analysing scientific processes to assume a given +assemblage of concepts applying to nature, and to imagine that the +discovery of laws of nature consists in selecting by means of inductive +logic some one out of a definite set of possible alternative relations +which may hold between the things in nature answering to these obvious +concepts. In a sense this assumption is fairly correct, especially +in regard to the earlier stages of science. Mankind found itself in +possession of certain concepts respecting nature—for example, the +concept of fairly permanent material bodies—and proceeded to determine +laws which related the corresponding percepts in nature. But the +formulation of laws changed the concepts, sometimes gently by an added +precision, sometimes violently. At first this process was not much +noticed, or at least was felt to be a process curbed within narrow +bounds, not touching fundamental ideas. At the stage where we now +are, the formulation of the concepts can be seen to be as important +as the formulation of the empirical laws connecting the events in the +universe as thus conceived<span class="pagenum" id="Page_109">[Pg 109]</span> by us. For example, the concepts of life, +of heredity, of a material body, of a molecule, of an atom, of an +electron, of energy, of space, of time, of quantity, and of number. I +am not dogmatising about the best way of getting such ideas straight. +Certainly it will only be done by those who have devoted themselves to +a special study of the facts in question. Success is never absolute, +and progress in the right direction is the result of a slow, gradual +process of continual comparison of ideas with facts. The criterion of +success is that we should be able to formulate empirical laws, that is, +statements of relations, connecting the various parts of the universe +as thus conceived, laws with the property that we can interpret the +actual events of our lives as being our fragmentary knowledge of this +conceived interrelated whole.</p> + +<p>But, for the purpose of science, what is the actual world? Has science +to wait for the termination of the metaphysical debate till it can +determine its own subject-matter? I suggest that science has a much +more homely starting-ground. Its task is the discovery of the relations +which exist within that flux of perceptions, sensations, and emotions +which forms our experience of life. The panorama yielded by sight, +sound, taste, smell, touch, and by more inchoate sensible feelings, +is the sole field of activity. It is in this way that science is the +thought organisation of<span class="pagenum" id="Page_110">[Pg 110]</span> experience. The most obvious aspect of this +field of actual experience is its disorderly character. It is for +each person a <i>continuum</i>, fragmentary, and with elements not +clearly differentiated. The comparison of the sensible experiences of +diverse people brings its own difficulties. I insist on the radically +untidy, ill-adjusted character of the fields of actual experience from +which science starts. To grasp this fundamental truth is the first +step in wisdom, when constructing a philosophy of science. This fact +is concealed by the influence of language, moulded by science, which +foists on us exact concepts as though they represented the immediate +deliverances of experience. The result is, that we imagine that we have +immediate experience of a world of perfectly defined objects implicated +in perfectly defined events which, as known to us by the direct +deliverance of our senses, happen at exact instants of time, in a space +formed by exact points, without parts and without magnitude: the neat, +trim, tidy, exact world which is the goal of scientific thought.</p> + +<p>My contention is, that this world is a world of ideas, and that its +internal relations are relations between abstract concepts, and that +the elucidation of the precise connection between this world and the +feelings of actual experience is the fundamental question of scientific +philosophy. The question which I am inviting you to consider<span class="pagenum" id="Page_111">[Pg 111]</span> is this: +How does exact thought apply to the fragmentary, vague <i>continua</i> +of experience? I am not saying that it does not apply: quite the +contrary. But I want to know how it applies. The solution I am +asking for is not a phrase, however brilliant, but a solid branch of +science, constructed with slow patience, showing in detail how the +correspondence is effected.</p> + +<p>The first great steps in the organisation of thought were due +exclusively to the practical source of scientific activity, without +any admixture of theoretical impulse. Their slow accomplishment was +the cause and also the effect of the gradual evolution of moderately +rational beings. I mean the formation of the concepts of definite +material objects, of the determinate lapse of time, of simultaneity, +of recurrence, of definite relative position, and of analogous +fundamental ideas, according to which the flux of our experience is +mentally arranged for handy reference: in fact, the whole apparatus of +commonsense thought. Consider in your mind some definite chair. The +concept of that chair is simply the concept of all the interrelated +experiences connected with that chair—namely, of the experience of the +folk who made it, of the folk who sold it, of the folk who have seen +it or used it, of the man who is now experiencing a comfortable sense +of support, combined with our expectations of an analogous future, +terminated finally<span class="pagenum" id="Page_112">[Pg 112]</span> by a different set of experiences when the chair +collapses and becomes firewood. The formation of that type of concept +was a tremendous job, and zoologists and geologists tell us that it +took many tens of millions of years. I can well believe it.</p> + +<p>I now emphasise two points. In the first place, science is rooted in +what I have just called the whole apparatus of commonsense thought. +That is the <i>datum</i> from which it starts, and to which it +must recur. We may speculate, if it amuses us, of other beings in +other planets who have arranged analogous experiences according to +an entirely different conceptual code—namely, who have directed +their chief attention to different relations between their various +experiences. But the task is too complex, too gigantic, to be revised +in its main outlines. You may polish up commonsense, you may contradict +it in detail, you may surprise it. But ultimately your whole task is to +satisfy it.</p> + +<p>In the second place, neither commonsense nor science can proceed with +their task of thought organisation without departing in some respect +from the strict consideration of what is actual in experience. Think +again of the chair. Among the experiences upon which its concept is +based, I included our expectations of its future history. I should +have gone further and included our imagination of all the possible +experiences which<span class="pagenum" id="Page_113">[Pg 113]</span> in ordinary language we should call perceptions of +the chair which might have occurred. This is a difficult question, and +I do not see my way through it. But, at present, in the construction of +a theory of space and of time there seem insuperable difficulties if we +refuse to admit ideal experiences.</p> + +<p>This imaginative perception of experiences, which, if they occurred, +would be coherent with our actual experiences, seems fundamental in our +lives. It is neither wholly arbitrary, nor yet fully determined. It +is a vague background which is only made in part definite by isolated +activities of thought. Consider, for example, our thoughts of the +unseen flora of Brazil.</p> + +<p>Ideal experiences are closely connected with our imaginative +reproduction of the actual experiences of other people, and also +with our almost inevitable conception of ourselves as receiving our +impressions from an external complex reality beyond ourselves. It +may be that an adequate analysis of every source and every type of +experience yields demonstrative proof of such a reality and of its +nature. Indeed, it is hardly to be doubted that this is the case. The +precise elucidation of this question is the problem of metaphysics. One +of the points which I am urging in this address is, that the basis of +science does not depend on the assumption of any of the conclusions of +metaphysics; but that both<span class="pagenum" id="Page_114">[Pg 114]</span> science and metaphysics start from the same +given groundwork of immediate experience, and in the main proceed in +opposite directions on their diverse tasks.</p> + +<p>For example, metaphysics inquires how our perceptions of the chair +relate us to some true reality. Science gathers up these perceptions +into a determinate class, adds to them ideal perceptions of analogous +sort, which under assignable circumstances would be obtained, and this +single concept of that set of perceptions is all that science needs; +unless indeed you prefer that thought find its origin in some legend of +those great twin brethren, the Cock and Bull.</p> + +<p>My immediate problem is to inquire into the nature of the texture of +science. Science is essentially logical. The nexus between its concepts +is a logical nexus, and the grounds for its detailed assertions +are logical grounds. King James said, "No bishops, no king." With +greater confidence we can say, "No logic, no science." The reason for +the instinctive dislike which most men of science feel towards the +recognition of this truth is, I think, the barren failure of logical +theory during the past three or four centuries. We may trace this +failure back to the worship of authority, which in some respects +increased in the learned world at the time of the Renaissance. Mankind +then changed its authority, and this fact temporally acted as an +emancipation. But<span class="pagenum" id="Page_115">[Pg 115]</span> the main fact, and we can find complaints<a id="FNanchor_2" href="#Footnote_2" class="fnanchor">[2]</a> of it +at the very commencement of the modern movement, was the establishment +of a reverential attitude towards any statement made by a classical +author. Scholars became commentators on truths too fragile to bear +translation. A science which hesitates to forget its founders is lost. +To this hesitation I ascribe the barrenness of logic. Another reason +for distrust of logical theory and of mathematics is the belief that +deductive reasoning can give you nothing new. Your conclusions are +contained in your premises, which by hypothesis are known to you.</p> + +<p>In the first place this last condemnation of logic neglects the +fragmentary, disconnected character of human knowledge. To know one +premise on Monday, and another premise on Tuesday, is useless to you +on Wednesday. Science is a permanent record of premises, deductions, +and conclusions, verified all along the line by its correspondence +with facts. Secondly, it is untrue that when we know the premises we +also know the conclusions. In arithmetic, for example, mankind are not +calculating boys. Any theory which proves that they are conversant with +the consequences of their assumptions must be wrong. We can imagine +beings who possess such insight. But we are not such creatures.<span class="pagenum" id="Page_116">[Pg 116]</span> +Both these answers are, I think, true and relevant. But they are +not satisfactory. They are too much in the nature of bludgeons, +too external. We want something more explanatory of the very real +difficulty which the question suggests. In fact, the true answer is +embedded in the discussion of our main problem of the relation of logic +to natural science.</p> + +<p>It will be necessary to sketch in broad outline some relevant features +of modern logic. In doing so I shall try to avoid the profound general +discussions and the minute technical classifications which occupy the +main part of traditional logic. It is characteristic of a science in +its earlier stages—and logic has become fossilised in such a stage—to +be both ambitiously profound in its aims and trivial in its handling of +details.</p> + +<p>We can discern four departments of logical theory. By an analogy +which is not so very remote I will call these departments or sections +the arithmetic section, the algebraic section, the section of +general-function theory, the analytical section. I do not mean that +arithmetic arises in the first section, algebra in the second section, +and so on; but the names are suggestive of certain qualities of +thought in each section which are reminiscent of analogous qualities +in arithmetic, in algebra, in the general theory of a mathematical +function, and in the mathematical analysis of the properties of +particular functions.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_117">[Pg 117]</span></p> + +<p>The first section—namely, the arithmetic stage—deals with the +relations of definite propositions to each other, just as arithmetic +deals with definite numbers. Consider any definite proposition; call it +"<i>p</i>." We conceive that there is always another proposition which +is the direct contradictory to "<i>p</i>"; call it "not-<i>p</i>." +When we have got two propositions, <i>p</i> and <i>q</i>, we can form +derivative propositions from them, and from their contradictories. We +can say, "At last one of <i>p</i> or <i>q</i> is true, and perhaps +both." Let us call this proposition "<i>p</i> or <i>q</i>." I may +mention as an aside that one of the greatest living philosophers has +stated that this use of the word "or"—namely, "<i>p</i> or <i>q</i>" +in the sense that either or both may be true—makes him despair of +exact expression. We must brave his wrath, which is unintelligible to +me.</p> + +<p>We have thus got hold of four new propositions, namely, "<i>p</i> +or <i>q</i>," and "not-<i>p</i> or <i>q</i>," and "<i>p</i> or +not-<i>q</i>," and "not-<i>p</i> or not-<i>q</i>." Call these the +set of disjunctive derivatives. There are, so far, in all eight +propositions, <i>p</i>, not-<i>p</i>, <i>q</i>, not-<i>q</i>, and the +four disjunctive derivatives. Any pair of these eight propositions can +be taken, and substituted for <i>p</i> and <i>q</i> in the foregoing +treatment. Thus each pair yields eight propositions, some of which +may have been obtained before. By proceeding in this way we arrive at +an unending set of propositions of growing complexity, ultimately<span class="pagenum" id="Page_118">[Pg 118]</span> +derived from the two original propositions <i>p</i> or <i>q</i>. Of +course, only a few are important. Similarly we can start from three +propositions, <i>p</i>, <i>q</i>, <i>r</i>, or from four propositions, +<i>p</i>, <i>q</i>, <i>r</i>, <i>s</i>, and so on. Any one of the +propositions of these aggregates may be true or false. It has no other +alternative. Whichever it is, true or false, call it the "truth-value" +of the proposition.</p> + +<p>The first section of logical inquiry is to settle what we know of the +truth-values of these propositions, when we know the truth-values of +some of them. The inquiry, so far as it is worth while carrying it, +is not very abstruse, and the best way of expressing its results is a +detail which I will not now consider. This inquiry forms the arithmetic +stage.</p> + +<p>The next section of logic is the algebraic stage. Now, the difference +between arithmetic and algebra is, that in arithmetic definite +numbers are considered, and in algebra symbols—namely, letters—are +introduced which stand for any numbers. The idea of a number is also +enlarged. These letters, standing for any numbers, are called sometimes +variables and sometimes parameters. Their essential characteristic is +that they are undetermined, unless, indeed, the algebraic conditions +which they satisfy implicitly determine them. Then they are sometimes +called unknowns. An algebraic formula with letters is a blank form. It +becomes a determinate arithmetic<span class="pagenum" id="Page_119">[Pg 119]</span> statement when definite numbers are +substituted for the letters. The importance of algebra is a tribute to +the study of form. Consider now the following proposition—</p> + +<div class="blockquot"> + +<p class="nindc">The specific heat of mercury is 0·033.</p> +</div> + +<p class="nind"> +This is a definite proposition which, with certain limitations, is +true. But the truth-value of the proposition does not immediately +concern us. Instead of mercury put a mere letter which is the name of +some undetermined thing: we get—</p> + +<div class="blockquot"> + +<p class="nindc">The specific heat of <i>x</i> is 0·033.</p> +</div> + +<p>This is not a proposition; it has been called by Russell a +propositional function. It is the logical analogy of an algebraic +expression. Let us write ƒ(<i>x</i>) for any propositional function.</p> + +<p>We could also generalise still further, and say,</p> + +<div class="blockquot"> + +<p class="nindc">The specific heat of <i>x</i> is <i>y</i>.</p> +</div> + +<p class="nind"> +We thus get another propositional function, F(<i>x</i>, <i>y</i>), +of two arguments <i>x</i> and <i>y</i>, and so on for any number of +arguments.</p> + +<p>Now, consider ƒ(<i>x</i>). There is the range of values of <i>x</i>, +for which ƒ(<i>x</i>) is a proposition, true or false. For values of +<i>x</i> outside this range, ƒ(<i>x</i>) is not a proposition at all, +and is neither true nor false. It may have vague suggestions for us, +but it has no unit meaning of definite assertion. For example,</p> + +<div class="blockquot"> + +<p class="nindc">The specific heat of water is 0·033</p> +</div> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_120">[Pg 120]</span></p> + +<p class="nind">is a proposition which is false; and—</p> + +<div class="blockquot"> + +<p class="nindc">The specific heat of virtue is 0·033</p> +</div> + +<p class="nind"> +is, I should imagine, not a proposition at all; so that it is neither +true nor false, though its component parts raise various associations +in our minds. This range of values, for which ƒ(<i>x</i>) has sense, is +called the "type" of the argument <i>x</i>.</p> + +<p>But there is also a range of values of <i>x</i> for which ƒ(<i>x</i>) +is a true proposition. This is the class of those values of the +argument which <i>satisfy</i> ƒ(<i>x</i>). This class may have no +members, or, in the other extreme, the class may be the whole type of +the arguments.</p> + +<p>We thus conceive two general propositions respecting the indefinite +number of propositions which share in the same logical form, that is, +which are values of the same propositional function. One of these +propositions is,</p> + +<div class="blockquot"> + +<p class="nindc"> +ƒ(<i>x</i>) yields a true proposition for each value of <i>x</i> of +the proper type;</p> +</div> + +<p class="nind">the other proposition is,</p> + +<div class="blockquot"> + +<p class="nindc">There is a value of <i>x</i> for which ƒ(<i>x</i>) is true.</p> +</div> + +<p>Given two, or more, propositional functions ƒ(<i>x</i>) and ϕ(<i>x</i>) +with the same argument <i>x</i>, we form derivative propositional +functions, namely,</p> + +<p class="nindc"> +ƒ(<i>x</i>) or ϕ(<i>x</i>), ƒ(<i>x</i>) or not-ϕ(<i>x</i>), +</p> + +<p class="nind"> +and so on with the contradictories, obtaining, as<span class="pagenum" id="Page_121">[Pg 121]</span> in the arithmetical +stage, an unending aggregate of propositional functions. Also each +propositional function yields two general propositions. The theory +of the interconnection between the truth-values of the general +propositions arising from any such aggregate of propositional functions +forms a simple and elegant chapter of mathematical logic.</p> + +<p>In this algebraic section of logic the theory of types crops up, as we +have already noted. It cannot be neglected without the introduction of +error. Its theory has to be settled at least by some safe hypothesis, +even if it does not go to the philosophic basis of the question. This +part of the subject is obscure and difficult, and has not been finally +elucidated, though Russell's brilliant work has opened out the subject.</p> + +<p>The final impulse to modern logic comes from the independent discovery +of the importance of the logic variable by Frege and Peano. Frege went +further than Peano, but by an unfortunate symbolism rendered his work +so obscure that no one fully recognised his meaning who had not found +it out for himself. But the movement has a large history reaching back +to Leibniz and even to Aristotle. Among English contributors are De +Morgan, Boole, and Sir Alfred Kempe; their work is of the first rank.</p> + +<p>The third logical section is the stage of general-function theory. +In logical language, we perform<span class="pagenum" id="Page_122">[Pg 122]</span> in this stage the transition from +intension to extension, and investigate the theory of denotation. Take +the propositional function, ƒ(<i>x</i>). There is the class, or range +of values for <i>x</i>, whose members satisfy ƒ(<i>x</i>). But the same +range may be the class whose members satisfy another propositional +function ϕ(<i>x</i>). It is necessary to investigate how to indicate +the class by a way which is indifferent as between the various +propositional functions which are satisfied by any member of it, and of +it only. What has to be done is to analyse the nature of propositions +about a class—namely, those propositions whose truth-values depend on +the class itself and not on the particular meaning by which the class +is indicated.</p> + +<p>Furthermore, there are propositions about alleged individuals +indicated by descriptive phrases: for example, propositions about "the +present King of England," who does exist, and "the present Emperor +of Brazil," who does not exist. More complicated, but analogous, +questions involving propositional functions of two variables involve +the notion of "correlation," just as functions of one argument involve +classes. Similarly functions of three arguments yield three-cornered +correlations, and so on. This logical section is one which Russell has +made peculiarly his own by work which must always remain fundamental. +I have called this the<span class="pagenum" id="Page_123">[Pg 123]</span> section of functional theory, because its +ideas are essential to the construction of logical denoting functions +which include as a special case ordinary mathematical functions, such +as sine, logarithm, etc. In each of these three stages it will be +necessary gradually to introduce an appropriate symbolism, if we are to +pass on to the fourth stage.</p> + +<p>The fourth logical section, the analytic stage, is concerned with the +investigation of the properties of special logical constructions, +that is, of classes and correlations of special sorts. The whole of +mathematics is included here. So the section is a large one. In fact, +it is mathematics, neither more nor less, but it includes an analysis +of mathematical ideas not hitherto included in the scope of that +science, nor, indeed, contemplated at all. The essence of this stage is +construction. It is by means of suitable constructions that the great +framework of applied mathematics, comprising the theories of number, +quantity, time, and space, is elaborated.</p> + +<p>It is impossible, even in brief outline, to explain how mathematics +is developed from the concepts of class and correlation, including +many-cornered correlations, which are established in the third section. +I can only allude to the headings of the process, which is fully +developed in the work, <i>Principia Mathematica</i>, by Mr. Russell +and myself. There are in this process of development seven<span class="pagenum" id="Page_124">[Pg 124]</span> special +sorts of correlations which are of peculiar interest. The first sort +comprises one-to-many, many-to-one, and one-to-one correlations. +The second sort comprises serial relations, that is, correlations +by which the members of some field are arranged in serial order, so +that, in the sense defined by the relation, any member of the field +is either before or after any other member. The third class comprises +inductive relations, that is, correlations on which the theory of +mathematical induction depends. The fourth class comprises selective +relations, which are required for the general theory of arithmetic +operations, and elsewhere. It is in connection with such relations that +the famous multiplicative axiom arises for consideration. The fifth +class comprises vector relations, from which the theory of quantity +arises. The sixth class comprises ratio relations, which interconnect +number and quantity. The seventh class comprises three-cornered and +four-cornered relations which occur in geometry.</p> + +<p>A bare enumeration of technical names, such as the above, is not very +illuminating, though it may help to a comprehension of the demarcations +of the subject. Please remember that the names are technical names, +meant, no doubt, to be suggestive, but used in strictly defined +senses. We have suffered much from critics who consider it sufficient +to criticise our procedure on the<span class="pagenum" id="Page_125">[Pg 125]</span> slender basis of a knowledge of +the dictionary meanings of such terms. For example, a one-to-one +correlation depends on the notion of a class with only one member, and +this notion is defined without appeal to the concept of the number one. +The notion of diversity is all that is wanted. Thus the class <img style="vertical-align: -0.025ex; width: 1.448ex; height: 1.025ex;" src="images/3.svg" alt="Greek letter alpha." data-tex="\(\alpha\)"> has +only one member, if (1) the class of values of <i>x</i> which satisfies +the propositional function,</p> + +<div class="blockquot"> + +<p class="nindc"><i>x</i> is not a member of <img style="vertical-align: -0.025ex; width: 1.448ex; height: 1.025ex;" src="images/3.svg" alt="Greek letter alpha." data-tex="\(\alpha\)">,</p> +</div> + +<p class="nind"> +is not the whole type of relevant values of <i>x</i>, and if (2) the +propositional function,</p> + +<div class="blockquot"> + +<p class="nindc"> +<i>x</i> and <i>y</i> are members of <img style="vertical-align: -0.025ex; width: 1.448ex; height: 1.025ex;" src="images/3.svg" alt="Greek letter alpha." data-tex="\(\alpha\)">, and <i>x</i> is diverse from +<i>y</i></p> +</div> + +<p class="nind"> +is false, whatever be the values of <i>x</i> and <i>y</i> in the +relevant type.</p> + +<p>Analogous procedures are obviously possible for higher finite cardinal +members. Thus, step by step, the whole cycle of current mathematical +ideas is capable of logical definition. The process is detailed and +laborious, and, like all science, knows nothing of a royal road of +airy phrases. The essence of the process is, first, to construct +the notion in terms of the forms of propositions, that is, in terms +of the relevant propositional functions, and secondly, to prove the +fundamental truths which hold about the notion by reference to the +results obtained in the algebraic section of logic.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_126">[Pg 126]</span></p> + +<p>It will be seen that in this process the whole apparatus of special +indefinable mathematical concepts, and special <i>a priori</i> +mathematical premises, respecting number, quantity, and space, has +vanished. Mathematics is merely an apparatus for analysing the +deductions which can be drawn from any particular premises, supplied +by commonsense, or by more refined scientific observation, so far as +these deductions depend on the forms of the propositions. Propositions +of certain forms are continually occurring in thought. Our existing +mathematics is the analysis of deductions which concern those forms and +in some way are important, either from practical utility or theoretical +interest. Here I am speaking of the science as it in fact exists. A +theoretical definition of mathematics must include in its scope any +deductions depending on the mere forms of propositions. But, of course +no one would wish to develop that part of mathematics which in no sense +is of importance.</p> + +<p>This hasty summary of logical ideas suggests some reflections. The +question arises, How many forms of propositions are there? The +answer is, An unending number. The reason for the supposed sterility +of logical science can thus be discerned. Aristotle founded the +science by conceiving the idea of the form of a proposition, and by +conceiving deduction as taking place in virtue<span class="pagenum" id="Page_127">[Pg 127]</span> of the forms. But he +confined propositions to four forms, now named A, I, E, O. So long as +logicians were obsessed by this unfortunate restriction, real progress +was impossible. Again, in their theory of form, both Aristotle and +subsequent logicians came very near to the theory of the logical +variable. But to come very near to a true theory, and to grasp its +precise application, are two very different things, as the history of +science teaches us. Everything of importance has been said before by +somebody who did not discover it.</p> + +<p>Again, one reason why logical deductions are not obvious is, that +logical form is not a subject which ordinarily enters into thought. +Commonsense deduction probably moves by blind instinct from concrete +proposition to concrete proposition, guided by some habitual +association of ideas. Thus commonsense fails in the presence of a +wealth of material.</p> + +<p>A more important question is the relation of induction, based on +observation, to deductive logic. There is a tradition of opposition +between adherents of induction and of deduction. In my view, it +would be just as sensible for the two ends of a worm to quarrel. +Both observation and deduction are necessary for any knowledge worth +having. We cannot get at an inductive law without having recourse to a +propositional<span class="pagenum" id="Page_128">[Pg 128]</span> function. For example, take the statement of observed +fact,</p> + +<div class="blockquot"> + +<p class="nindc">This body is mercury, and its specific heat is 0·033.</p> +</div> + +<p class="nind">The propositional function is formed,</p> + +<div class="blockquot"> + +<p class="nindc"> +Either <i>x</i> is not mercury, or its specific heat is 0·033.</p> +</div> + +<p class="nind"> +The inductive law is the assumption of the truth of the general +proposition, that the above propositional function is true for every +value of <i>x</i> in the relevant type.</p> + +<p>But it is objected that this process and its consequences are so simple +that an elaborate science is out of place. In the same way, a British +sailor knows the salt sea when he sails over it. What, then, is the use +of an elaborate chemical analysis of sea-water? There is the general +answer, that you cannot know too much of methods which you always +employ; and there is the special answer, that logical forms and logical +implications are not so very simple, and that the whole of mathematics +is evidence to this effect.</p> + +<p>One great use of the study of logical method is not in the region of +elaborate deduction, but to guide us in the study of the formation of +the main concepts of science. Consider geometry, for example. What are +the points which compose space? Euclid tells us that they are without<span class="pagenum" id="Page_129">[Pg 129]</span> +parts and without magnitude. But how is the notion of a point derived +from the sense-perceptions from which science starts? Certainly points +are not direct deliverances of the senses. Here and there we may see or +unpleasantly feel something suggestive of a point. But this is a rare +phenomenon, and certainly does not warrant the conception of space as +composed of points. Our knowledge of space properties is not based on +any observations of relations between points. It arises from experience +of relations between bodies. Now a fundamental space-relation between +bodies is that one body may be part of another. We are tempted to +define the "whole and part" relation by saying that the points occupied +by the part are some of the points occupied by the whole. But "whole +and part" being more fundamental than the notion of "point," this +definition is really circular and vicious.</p> + +<p>We accordingly ask whether any other definition of "spatial whole and +part" can be given. I think that it can be done in this way, though, +if I be mistaken, it is unessential to my general argument. We have +come to the conclusion that an extended body is nothing else than the +class of perception of it by all its percipients, actual or ideal. Of +course, it is not any class of perceptions, but a certain definite sort +of class which I have not defined here, except by the vicious<span class="pagenum" id="Page_130">[Pg 130]</span> method +of saying that they are perceptions of body. Now, the perceptions of a +part of a body are among the perceptions which compose the whole body. +Thus two bodies <i>a</i> and <i>b</i> are both classes of perceptions; +and <i>b</i> is part of <i>a</i> when the class which is <i>b</i> +is contained in the class which is <i>a</i>. It immediately follows +from the logical form of this definition that if <i>b</i> is part of +<i>a</i>, and <i>c</i> is part of <i>b</i>, then <i>c</i> is part of +<i>a</i>. Thus the relation "whole to part" is transitive. Again, it +will be convenient to allow that a body is part of itself. This is a +mere question of how you draw the definition. With this understanding, +the relation is reflexive. Finally, if <i>a</i> is part of <i>b</i>, +and <i>b</i> is part of <i>a</i>, then <i>a</i> and <i>b</i> must +be identical. These properties of "whole and part" are not fresh +assumptions, they follow from the logical form of our definition.</p> + +<p>One assumption has to be made if we assume the ideal infinite +divisibility of space. Namely, we assume that every class of +perceptions which is an extended body contains other classes of +perceptions which are extended bodies diverse from itself. This +assumption makes rather a large draft on the theory of ideal +perceptions. Geometry vanishes unless in some form you make it. The +assumption is not peculiar to my exposition.</p> + +<p>It is then possible to define what we mean by<span class="pagenum" id="Page_131">[Pg 131]</span> a point. A point is the +class of extended objects which, in ordinary language, contain that +point. The definition, without presupposing the idea of a point, is +rather elaborate, and I have not now time for its statement.</p> + +<p>The advantage of introducing points into geometry is the simplicity +of the logical expression of their mutual relations. For science, +simplicity of definition is of slight importance, but simplicity of +mutual relations is essential. Another example of this law is the way +physicists and chemists have dissolved the simple idea of an extended +body, say of a chair, which a child understands, into a bewildering +notion of a complex dance of molecules and atoms and electrons and +waves of light. They have thereby gained notions with simpler logical +relations.</p> + +<p>Space as thus conceived is the exact formulation of the properties of +the apparent space of the commonsense world of experience. It is not +necessarily the best mode of conceiving the space of the physicist. +The one essential requisite is that the correspondence between the +commonsense world in its space and the physicists' world in its space +should be definite and reciprocal.</p> + +<p>I will now break off the exposition of the function of logic in +connection with the science of natural phenomena. I have endeavoured +to exhibit it as the organising principle, analysing<span class="pagenum" id="Page_132">[Pg 132]</span> the derivation +of the concepts from the immediate phenomena, examining the structure +of the general propositions which are the assumed laws of nature, +establishing their relations to each other in respect to reciprocal +implications, deducing the phenomena we may expect under given +circumstances.</p> + +<p>Logic, properly used, does not shackle thought. It gives freedom, and +above all, boldness. Illogical thought hesitates to draw conclusions, +because it never knows either what it means, or what it assumes, or +how far it trusts its own assumptions, or what will be the effect of +any modification of assumptions. Also the mind untrained in that part +of constructive logic which is relevant to the subject in hand will be +ignorant of the sort of conclusions which follow from various sorts of +assumptions, and will be correspondingly dull in divining the inductive +laws. The fundamental training in this relevant logic is, undoubtedly, +to ponder with an active mind over the known facts of the case, +directly observed. But where elaborate deductions are possible, this +mental activity requires for its full exercise the direct study of the +abstract logical relations. This is applied mathematics.</p> + +<p>Neither logic without observation, nor observation without logic, can +move one step in the formation of science. We may conceive humanity<span class="pagenum" id="Page_133">[Pg 133]</span> +as engaged in an internecine conflict between youth and age. Youth is +not defined by years but by the creative impulse to make something. The +aged are those who, before all things, desire not to make a mistake. +Logic is the olive branch from the old to the young, the wand which in +the hands of youth has the magic property of creating science.</p> + + +<div class="footnotes"><h3>FOOTNOTES:</h3> + +<div class="footnote"> + +<p class="nind"><a id="Footnote_2" href="#FNanchor_2" class="label">[2]</a> +<i>E.g.</i> in 1551 by Italian schoolmen; cf. Sarpi's +<i>History of the Council of Trent</i>, under that date.</p> + +</div> +</div> + + +<hr class="chap x-ebookmaker-drop"> + +<div class="chapter"> +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_134">[Pg 134]</span></p> +<h2 class="nobreak" id="CHAPTER_VII">CHAPTER VII<br> +THE ANATOMY OF SOME SCIENTIFIC IDEAS</h2> +</div> + +<p class="nindc space-below2"><i>I. Fact</i></p> + +<p>THE characteristic of physical science is, that it ignores all +judgments of value: for example, æsthetic or moral judgments. It is +purely matter-of-fact, and this is the sense in which we must interpret +the sonorous phrase, "Man, the servant and the minister of Nature."</p> + +<p>The sphere of thought which is thus left is even then too wide for +physical science. It would include Ontology, namely, the determination +of the nature of what truly exists; in other words, Metaphysics. From +an abstract point of view this exclusion of metaphysical inquiry +is a pity. Such an inquiry is a necessary critique of the worth of +science, to tell us what it all comes to. The reasons for its careful +separation from scientific thought are purely practical; namely, +because we can agree about science—after due debate—whereas in +respect to metaphysics debate has hitherto accentuated disagreement. +These characteristics of science and metaphysics were unexpected in the +early days<span class="pagenum" id="Page_135">[Pg 135]</span> of civilised thought. The Greeks thought that metaphysics +was easier than physics, and tended to deduce scientific principles +from <i>a priori</i> conceptions of the nature of things. They were +restrained in this disastrous tendency by their vivid naturalism, their +delight in first-hand perception. Mediæval Europe shared the tendency +without the restraint. It is possible that some distant generations +may arrive at unanimous conclusions on ontological questions, whereas +scientific progress may have led to ingrained opposing veins of +thought which can neither be reconciled nor abandoned. In such times +metaphysics and physical science will exchange their rôles. Meanwhile +we must take the case as we find it.</p> + +<p>But a problem remains. How can mankind agree about science without +a preliminary determination of what really is? The answer must be +found in an analysis of the facts which form the field of scientific +activity. Mankind perceives, and finds itself thinking about its +perceptions. It is the thought that matters and not that element of +perception which is not thought. When the immediate judgment has been +formed—Hullo, red!—it does not matter if we can imagine that in other +circumstances—in better circumstances, perhaps—the judgment would +have been—Hullo, blue!—or even—Hullo, nothing! For all intents and +purposes, at the time it was red.<span class="pagenum" id="Page_136">[Pg 136]</span> Everything else is hypothetical +reconstruction. The field of physical science is composed of these +primary thoughts, and of thoughts about these thoughts.</p> + +<p>But—to avoid confusion—a false simplicity has been introduced above +into the example given of a primary perceptive thought. "Hullo, red!" +is not really a primary perceptive thought, though it often is the +first thought which finds verbal expression even silently in the mind. +Nothing is in isolation. The perception of red is of a red object in +its relations to the whole content of the perceiving consciousness.</p> + +<p>Among the most easily analysed of such relations are the space +relations. Again the red object is in immediate perception nothing else +than a red object. It is better termed an "object of redness." Thus a +better approximation to an immediate perceptive judgment is, "Hullo, +object of redness there!" But, of course, in this formulation other +more complex relations are omitted.</p> + +<p>This tendency towards a false simplicity in scientific analysis, to +an excessive abstraction, to an over-universalising of universals, +is derived from the earlier metaphysical stage. It arises from the +implicit belief that we are endeavouring to qualify the real with +appropriate adjectives. In conformity with this tendency we think, +"this real thing is red." Whereas our true goal<span class="pagenum" id="Page_137">[Pg 137]</span> is to make explicit +our perception of the apparent in terms of its relations. What we +perceive is redness related to other apparents. Our object is the +analysis of the relations.</p> + +<p>One aim of science is the harmony of thought, that is, to secure +that judgments which are logical contraries should not be +thought-expressions of consciousness. Another aim is the extension of +such harmonised thought.</p> + +<p>Some thoughts arise directly from sense-presentation, and are part of +the state of consciousness which is perception. Such a thought is, "An +object of redness is there." But in general the thought is not verbal, +but is a direct apprehension of qualities and relations within the +content of consciousness.</p> + +<p>Amid such thoughts there can be no lack of harmony. For direct +apprehension is in its essence unique, and it is impossible to +apprehend an object as both red and blue. Subsequently it may be judged +that if other elements of the consciousness had been different, the +apprehension would have been of a blue object. Then—under certain +circumstances—the original apprehension will be called an error. But +for all that the fact remains, there was an apprehension of a red +object.</p> + +<p>When we speak of sense-presentation, we mean these primary thoughts +essentially involved in its perception. But there are thoughts about<span class="pagenum" id="Page_138">[Pg 138]</span> +thoughts, and thoughts derived from other thoughts. These are secondary +thoughts. At this point it is well explicitly to discriminate between +an actual thought-expression, namely, a judgment actually made, and a +mere proposition which is a hypothetical thought-expression, namely, +an imagined possibility of thought-expression. Note that the actual +complete thought-content of the consciousness is explicitly neither +affirmed or denied. It is just what <i>is</i> thought. Thus, to think +"two and two make four" is distinct from affirming that two and two +make four. In the first case the proposition is the thought-expression, +in the second case the affirmation of the proposition is the +thought-expression, and the proposition has been degraded to a mere +proposition, namely, to a hypothetical thought-expression which is +reflected upon.</p> + +<p>A distinction is sometimes made between facts and thoughts. So far as +physical science is concerned, the facts are thoughts, and thoughts +are facts. Namely, the facts of sense-presentation as they affect +science are those elements in the immediate apprehensions which are +thoughts. Also, actual thought-expressions, primary or secondary, are +the material facts which science interprets.</p> + +<p>The distinction that facts are given, but thoughts are free, is +not absolute. We can select and modify our sense-presentation, so +that facts—in<span class="pagenum" id="Page_139">[Pg 139]</span> the narrower sense of immediate apprehension of +sense-presentation—are to some degree subject to volition. Again, our +stream of thought-expression is only partially modified by explicit +volition. We can choose our physical experience, and we find ourselves +thinking; namely, on the one hand there is selection amid the dominant +necessity of sense, and on the other hand, the thought-content of +consciousness (so far as secondary thoughts are concerned) is not +wholly constituted by the selection of will.</p> + +<p>Thus, on the whole there is a large primary region of secondary +thought, as well as of the primary thoughts of sense-presentation, +which is given in type. That is the way in which we do think of things, +not wholly from any abstract necessity, so far as we know, but because +we have inherited the method from an environment. It is the way we find +ourselves thinking, a way which can only be fundamentally laid aside by +an immense effort, and then only for isolated short periods of time. +This is what I have called the "whole apparatus of commonsense thought."</p> + +<p>It is this body of thought which is assumed in science. It is a way +of thinking rather than a set of axioms. It is, in fact, the set of +concepts which commonsense has found useful in sorting out human +experience. It is modified in detail, but assumed in gross. The +explanations of science are directed to finding conceptions<span class="pagenum" id="Page_140">[Pg 140]</span> and +propositions concerning nature which explain the importance of these +common sense notions. For example, a chair is a common sense notion, +molecules and electrons explain our vision of chairs.</p> + +<p>Now science aims at harmonising our reflective and derivative thoughts +with the primary thoughts involved in the immediate apprehension of +sense-presentation. It also aims at producing such derivative thoughts, +logically knit together. This is scientific theory; and the harmony to +be achieved is the agreement of theory with observation, which is the +apprehension of sense-presentation.</p> + +<p>Thus there is a twofold scientific aim: (1) the production of theory +which agrees with experience; and (2) the explanation of commonsense +concepts of nature, at least in their main outlines. This explanation +consists in the preservation of the concepts in a scientific theory of +harmonised thought.</p> + +<p>It is not asserted that this is what scientists in the past meant to +achieve, or thought that they could achieve. It is suggested as the +actual result of scientific effort, so far as that effort has had +any measure of success. In short, we are here discussing the natural +history of ideas and not volitions of scientists.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_141">[Pg 141]</span></p> + + +<p class="nindc space-above2"><i>II. Objects</i></p> + +<p>We perceive things in space. For example, among such things are dogs, +chairs, curtains, drops of water, gusts of air, flames, rainbows, +chimes of bells, odours, aches and pains. There is a scientific +explanation of the origin of these perceptions. This explanation +is given in terms of molecules, atoms, electrons, and their mutual +relations, in particular of their space-relations, and waves of +disturbance of these space-relations which are propagated through +space. The primary elements of the scientific explanation—molecules, +etc.—are not the things directly perceived. For example, we do not +perceive a wave of light; the sensation of sight is the resultant +effect of the impact of millions of such waves through a stretch of +time. Thus the object directly perceived corresponds to a series of +events in the physical world, events which are prolonged through +a stretch of time. Nor is it true that a perceived object always +corresponds to the same group of molecules. After a few years we +recognise the same cat, but we are thereby related to different +molecules.</p> + +<p>Again, neglecting for a moment the scientific explanation, the +perceived object is largely the supposition of our imagination. When +we recognised the cat, we also recognised that it was glad<span class="pagenum" id="Page_142">[Pg 142]</span> to see +us. But we merely heard its mewing, saw it arch its back, and felt it +rubbing itself against us. We must distinguish, therefore, between the +many direct objects of sense, and the single indirect object of thought +which is the cat.</p> + +<p>Thus, when we say that we perceived the cat and understood its +feelings, we mean that we heard a sense-object of sound, that we saw a +sense-object of sight, that we felt a sense-object of touch, and that +we thought of a cat and imagined its feelings.</p> + +<p>Sense-objects are correlated by time-relations and space-relations. +Three simultaneous sense-objects which are also spatially coincident, +are combined by thought into the perception of one cat. Such +combination of sense-objects is an instinctive immediate judgment in +general without effort of reasoning. Sometimes only one sense-object +is present. For example, we hear mewing and say there must be a cat +in the room. The transition from the sense-object to the cat has +then been made, by deliberate ratiocination. Even the concurrence of +sense-objects may provoke such a self-conscious effort. For example, in +the dark we feel something, and hear mewing from the same place, and +think, Surely this is a cat. Sight is more bold; when we see a cat, we +do not think further. We identify the sight with the cat, whereas the +cat and the mew are separate. But such immediate identification of<span class="pagenum" id="Page_143">[Pg 143]</span> +a sight object and an object of thought may lead to error; the birds +pecked at the grapes of Apelles.</p> + +<p>A single sense-object is a complex entity. The sight-object of a +tile on the hearth may remain unchanged as we watch it in a steady +light, remaining ourselves unchanged in position. Even then it is +prolonged in time, and has parts in space. Also it is somewhat +arbitrarily distinguished from a larger whole of which it forms part. +But the glancing fire-light and a change in our position alters the +sight-object. We judge that the tile thought-object remains unchanged. +The sight-object of the coal on the fire gradually modifies, though +within short intervals it remains unchanged. We judge that the coal +thought-object is changing. The flame is never the same, and its shape +is only vaguely distinguishable.</p> + +<p>We conclude that a single self-identical sight-object is already a +phantasy of thought. Consider the unchanging sight-object of the tile, +as we remain still in a steady light. Now a sense-object perceived at +one time is a distinct object from a sense-object seen at another time. +Thus the sight of the tile at noon is distinct from its sight at 12.30. +But there is no such thing as a sense-object at an instant. As we stare +at the tile, a minute, or a second, or a tenth of a second, has flown +by: essentially there is a duration. There is a stream of sight, and +we can distinguish<span class="pagenum" id="Page_144">[Pg 144]</span> its parts. But the parts also are streams, and +it is only in thought that the stream separates into a succession of +elements. The stream may be "steady" as in the case of the unchanging +sight-tile, or may be "turbulent" as in the case of the glancing +sight-flame. In either case a sight-object is some arbitrarily small +part of the stream.</p> + +<p>Again, the stream which forms the succession of sight-tiles is merely a +distinguishable part of the whole stream of sight-presentation.</p> + +<p>So, finally, we conceive ourselves each experiencing a complete +time-flux (or stream) of sense-presentation. This stream is +distinguishable into parts. The grounds of distinction are differences +of sense—including within that term, differences of types of sense, +and differences of quality and of intensity within the same type +of sense—and differences of time-relations, and differences of +space-relations. Also the parts are not mutually exclusive and exist in +unbounded variety.</p> + +<p>The time-relation between the parts raises the questions of memory and +recognition, subjects too complex for discussion here. One remark must +be made. If it be admitted, as stated above, that we live in durations +and not in instants, namely, that the present essentially occupies +a stretch of time, the distinction between memory and immediate +presentation cannot be<span class="pagenum" id="Page_145">[Pg 145]</span> quite fundamental; for always we have with us +the fading present as it becomes the immediate past. This region of our +consciousness is neither pure memory nor pure immediate presentation. +Anyhow, memory is also a presentation in consciousness.</p> + +<p>Another point is to be noted in connection with memory. There is no +directly perceived time-relation between a present event and a past +event. The present event is only related to the memory of the past +event. But the memory of a past event is itself a present element +in consciousness. We assert the principle that directly perceived +relations can only exist between elements of consciousness, both in +that present during which the perception occurs. All other relations +between elements of perception are inferential constructions. It thus +becomes necessary to explain how the time stream of events establishes +itself in thought, and how the apparent world fails to collapse into +one single present. The solution of the difficulty is arrived at +by observing that the present is itself a duration, and therefore +includes directly perceived time-relations between events contained +within it. In other words we put the present on the same footing as +the past and the future in respect to the inclusion within it of +antecedent and succeeding events, so that past, present, and future +are in this respect exactly analogous<span class="pagenum" id="Page_146">[Pg 146]</span> ideas. Thus there will be two +events <i>a</i> and <i>b</i>, both in the same present, but the event +<i>a</i> will be directly perceived to precede the event <i>b</i>. +Again time flows on, and the event <i>a</i> fades into the past, and +in the new present duration events <i>b</i> and <i>c</i> occur, event +<i>b</i> preceding event <i>c</i>, also in the same present duration +there is the memory of the time-relation between <i>a</i> and <i>b</i>. +Then by an inferential construction the event <i>a</i> in the past +precedes the event <i>c</i> in the present. By proceeding according to +this principle the time-relations between elements of consciousness, +not in the same present, are established. The method of procedure +here explained is a first example of what we will call the Principle +of Aggregation. This is one of the fundamental principles of mental +construction according to which our conception of the external physical +world is constructed. Other examples will later on be met with.</p> + +<p>The space-relations between the parts are confused and fluctuating, +and in general lack determinate precision. The master-key by which +we confine our attention to such parts as possess mutual relations +sufficiently simple for our intellects to consider is the principle of +convergence to simplicity with diminution of extent. We will call it +the "principle of convergence." This principle extends throughout the +whole field of sense-presentation.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_147">[Pg 147]</span></p> + +<p>The first application of the principle occurs in respect to time. +The shorter the stretch of time, the simpler are the aspects of the +sense-presentation contained within it. The perplexing effects of +change are diminished and in many cases can be neglected. Nature has +restricted the acts of thought which endeavour to realise the content +of the present, to stretches of time sufficiently short to secure this +static simplicity over the greater part of the sense-stream.</p> + +<p>Spatial relations become simplified within the approximately static +sense-world of the short time. A further simplicity is gained by +partitioning this static world into parts of restricted space-content. +The various parts thus obtained have simpler mutual space-relations, +and again the principle of convergence holds.</p> + +<p>Finally, the last simplicity is obtained by partitioning the +parts, already restricted as to space and time, into further parts +characterised by homogeneity in type of sense, and homogeneity in +quality and intensity of sense. These three processes of restriction +yield, finally, the sense-objects which have been mentioned above. Thus +the sense-object is the result of an active process of discrimination +made in virtue of the principle of convergence. It is the result of +the quest for simplicity of relations within the complete stream of +sense-presentation.</p> + +<p>The thought-objects of perception are instances<span class="pagenum" id="Page_148">[Pg 148]</span> of a fundamental +law of nature, the law of objective stability. It is the law of the +coherence of sense-objects. This law of stability has an application +to time and an application to space; also it must be applied in +conjunction with that other law, the principle of convergence to +simplicity from which sense-objects are derived.</p> + +<p>Some composite partial streams of sense-presentation can be +distinguished with the following characteristics: (1) the +time-succession of sense-objects, belonging to a single sense, involved +in any such a composite partial stream, is composed of very similar +objects whose modifications increase only gradually, and thus forms +a homogeneous component stream within the composite stream; (2) the +space-relations of those sense-objects (of various senses) of such +a composite stream which are confined within any sufficiently short +time are identical so far as they are definitely apprehended, and thus +these various component streams, each homogeneous, "cohere" to form the +whole composite partial stream; (3) there are other sense-presentations +occurring in association with that composite partial stream which +can be determined by rules derived from analogous composite partial +streams, with other space and time relations, provided that the analogy +be sufficiently close. Call these the "associated sense-presentations." +A partial stream of this<span class="pagenum" id="Page_149">[Pg 149]</span> sort, viewed as a whole, is here called a +"first crude thought-object of perception."</p> + +<p>For example, we look at an orange for half a minute, handle it, and +smell it, note its position in the fruit-basket, and then turn away. +The stream of sense-presentation of the orange during that half-minute +is a first crude thought-object of perception. Among the associated +sense presentations are those of the fruit-basket which we conceive as +supporting the orange.</p> + +<p>The essential ground of the association of sense-objects of +various types, perceived within one short duration, into a first +crude thought-object of perception is the coincidence of their +space-relations, that is, in general an approximate coincidence of +such relations perhaps only vaguely apprehended. Thus coincident +space-relations associate sense-objects into a first crude +thought-object, and diverse space-relations dissociate sense-objects +from aggregation into a first crude thought-object. In respect to +some groups of sense-objects the association may be an immediate +judgment devoid of all inference, so that the primary perceptual +thought is that of the first crude thought-object, and the separate +sense-objects are the result of reflective analysis acting on memory. +For example sense-objects of sight and sense-objects of touch are +often thus primarily associated and only secondarily dissociated in +thought. But sometimes the association<span class="pagenum" id="Page_150">[Pg 150]</span> is wavering and indeterminate, +for example, that between the sound-object of the mew of the cat and +the sight-object of the cat. Thus to sum up, the partial stream of +sense-perceptions coalesces into that first crude thought-object of +perception which is the momentary cat because the sense-perceptions +belonging to this stream are in the same place, but equally it would +be true to say that they are in the same place because they belong +to the same momentary cat. This analysis of the complete stream of +sense-presentation in any small present duration into a variety of +first crude thought-objects only partially fits the facts; for one +reason because many sense-objects, such as sound for instance, have +vague and indeterminate space-relations, for example vaguely those +space-relations which we associate with our organs of sense and also +vaguely those of the origin from which (in the scientific explanation) +they proceed.</p> + +<p>The procedure by which the orange of half a minute is elaborated into +the orange in the ordinary sense of the term involves in addition the +two principles of aggregation and of hypothetical sense-presentation.</p> + +<p>The principle of aggregation, as here employed, takes the form that +many distinct first crude thought-objects of perception are conceived +as one thought-object of perception, if the many partial streams +forming these objects are sufficiently<span class="pagenum" id="Page_151">[Pg 151]</span> analogous, if their times of +occurrence are distinct, and if the associated sense-presentations are +sufficiently analogous.</p> + +<p>For example, after leaving the orange, in five minutes we return. +A new first crude thought-object of perception presents itself to +us, indistinguishable from the half-minute orange we previously +experienced; it is in the same fruit-basket. We aggregate the two +presentations of an orange into the same orange. By such aggregations +we obtain "second crude thought-objects of perception." But however far +we can proceed with aggregation of this type, the orange is more than +that. For example, what do we mean when we say, The orange is in the +cupboard, if Tom has not eaten it?</p> + +<p>The world of present fact is more than a stream of sense-presentation. +We find ourselves with emotions, volitions, imaginations, conceptions, +and judgments. No factor which enters into consciousness is by itself +or even can exist in isolation. We are analysing certain relations +between sense-presentation and other factors of consciousness. +Hitherto we have taken into account merely the factors of concept and +judgment. Imagination is necessary to complete the orange, namely, +the imagination of hypothetical sense-presentations. It is beside +the point to argue whether we ought to have such imaginations, or to +discuss what are the metaphysical<span class="pagenum" id="Page_152">[Pg 152]</span> truths concerning reality to which +they correspond. We are here only concerned with the fact that such +imaginations exist and essentially enter into the formation of the +concepts of the thought-objects of perception which are the first +data of science. We conceive the orange as a permanent collection of +sense-presentations existing as if they were an actual element in our +consciousness, which they are not. The orange is thus conceived as +in the cupboard with its shape, odour, colour, and other qualities. +Namely, we imagine hypothetical possibilities of sense-presentation, +and conceive their want of actuality in our consciousness as immaterial +to their existence in fact. The fact which is essential for science is +our conception; its meaning in regard to the metaphysics of reality is +of no scientific importance, so far as physical science is concerned.</p> + +<p>The orange completed in this way is the thought-object of perception.</p> + +<p>It must be remembered that the judgments and concepts arising in the +formation of thought-objects of perception are in the main instinctive +judgments, and instinctive concepts, and are not concepts and judgments +consciously sought for and consciously criticised before adoption. +Their adoption is facilitated by and interwoven with the expectation of +the future in which the hypothetical<span class="pagenum" id="Page_153">[Pg 153]</span> passes into the actual, and also +with the further judgment of the existence of other consciousnesses, +so that much that is hypothetical to one consciousness is judged to be +actual to others.</p> + +<p>The thought-object of perception is, in fact, a device to make plain +to our reflective consciousness relations which hold within the +complete stream of sense-presentation. Concerning the utility of this +weapon there can be no question; it is the rock upon which the whole +structure of commonsense thought is erected. But when we consider the +limits of its application the evidence is confused. A great part of our +sense-presentation can be construed as perception of various persistent +thought-objects. But hardly at any time can the sense-presentations +be construed wholly in that way. Sights lend themselves easily to +this construction, but sight can be baffled: for example, consider +reflections in looking-glasses, apparently bent sticks half in and half +out of water, rainbows, brilliant patches of light which conceal the +object from which they emanate, and many analogous phenomena. Sound +is more difficult; it tends largely to disengage itself from any such +object. For example, we see the bell, but we hear the sound which +comes from the bell; yet we also say that we hear the bell. Again, a +toothache is largely by itself, and is only<span class="pagenum" id="Page_154">[Pg 154]</span> indirectly a perception +of the nerve of the tooth. Illustrations to the same effect can be +accumulated from every type of sensation.</p> + +<p>Another difficulty arises from the fact of change. The thought-object +is conceived as one thing, wholly actual at each instant. But since +the meat has been bought it has been cooked, the grass grows and then +withers, the coal burns in the fire, the pyramids of Egypt remain +unchanged for ages, but even the pyramids are not wholly unchanged. The +difficulty of change is merely evaded by affixing a technical Latin +name to a supposed logical fallacy. A slight cooking leaves the meat +the same object, but two days in the oven burns it to a cinder. When +does the meat cease to be? Now the chief use of the thought-object +is the concept of it as one thing, here and now, which later can be +recognised, there and then. This concept applies sufficiently well to +most things for short times, and to many things for long times. But +sense-presentation as a whole entirely refuses to be patient of the +concept.</p> + +<p>We have now come to the reflective region of explanation, which is +science.</p> + +<p>A great part of the difficulty is at once removed by applying the +principle of convergence to simplicity. We habitually make our +thought-objects too large; we should think in smaller parts. For +example, the Sphinx has changed by its nose becoming chipped, but by +proper<span class="pagenum" id="Page_155">[Pg 155]</span> inquiry we could find the missing part in some private house +of Western Europe or Northern America. Thus, either part, the rest +of the Sphinx or the chip, regains its permanence. Furthermore, we +enlarge this explanation by conceiving parts so small that they can +only be observed under the most favourable circumstances. This is a +wide extension of the principle of convergence in its application to +nature; but it is a principle amply supported by the history of exact +observation.</p> + +<p>Thus, change in thought-objects of perception is largely explained as +a disintegration into smaller parts, themselves thought-objects of +perception. The thought-objects of perception which are presupposed in +the common thought of civilised beings are almost wholly hypothetical. +The material universe is largely a concept of the imagination which +rests on a slender basis of direct sense-presentation. But none the +less it is a fact; for it is a fact that actually we imagine it. Thus +it is actual in our consciousness just as sense-presentation also is +actual there. The effort of reflective criticism is to make these two +factors in our consciousness agree where they are related, namely, +to construe our sense-presentation as actual realisation of the +hypothetical thought-objects of perception.</p> + +<p>The wholesale employment of purely hypothetical thought-objects of +perception enables<span class="pagenum" id="Page_156">[Pg 156]</span> science to explain some of the stray sense-objects +which cannot be construed as perceptions of a thought-object of +perception: for example, sounds. But the phenomena as a whole defy +explanation on these lines until a further fundamental step is taken, +which transforms the whole concept of the material universe. Namely, +the thought-object of perception is superseded by the thought-object of +science.</p> + +<p>The thought-objects of science are molecules, atoms, and electrons. The +peculiarity of these objects is that they have shed all the qualities +which are capable of direct sense-representation in consciousness. +They are known to us only by their associated phenomena, namely, +series of events in which they are implicated are represented in our +consciousness by sense-presentations. In this way, the thought-objects +of science are conceived as the causes of sense-representation. The +transition from thought-objects of perception to thought-objects of +science is decently veiled by an elaborate theory concerning primary +and secondary qualities of bodies.</p> + +<p>This device, by which sense-presentations are represented in thought +as our perception of events in which thought-objects of science are +implicated, is the fundamental means by which a bridge is formed +between the fluid vagueness of sense and the exact definition of +thought. In thought a proposition is either true or false,<span class="pagenum" id="Page_157">[Pg 157]</span> an entity +is exactly what it is, and relations between entities are expressible +(in idea) by definite propositions about distinctly conceived entities. +Sense-perception knows none of these things, except by courtesy. +Accuracy essentially collapses at some stage of inquiry.</p> + + +<p class="nindc space-above2"><i>III. Time and Space</i></p> + +<p><i>Recapitulation.</i>—Relations of time and relations of space +hold between sense-objects of perception. These sense-objects are +distinguished as separate objects by the recognition of either (1) +differences of sense-content, or (2) time-relations between them +other than simultaneity, or (3) space-relations between them other +than coincidence. Thus sense-objects arise from the recognition of +contrast within the complete stream of sense-presentation, namely, from +the recognition of the objects as related terms, by relations which +contrast them. Differences of sense-content are infinitely complex in +their variety. Their analysis under the heading of general ideas is the +unending task of physical science. Time-relations and space-relations +are comparatively simple, and the general ideas according to which +their analysis should proceed are obvious.</p> + +<p>This simplicity of time and space is perhaps the reason why thought +chooses them as the permanent<span class="pagenum" id="Page_158">[Pg 158]</span> ground for objectival distinction, +throwing the various sense-objects thus obtainable into one heap, as +a first crude thought-object of perception, and thence, as described +above, obtaining a thought-object of perception. Thus a thought-object +of perception conceived as in the present of a short duration is a +first crude thought-object of perception either actual or hypothetical. +Such a thought-object of perception, confined within a short duration, +takes on the space-relations of its component sense-objects within that +same duration. Accordingly thought-objects of perception, conceived in +their whole extents, have to each other the time-relationships of their +complete existences, and within any small duration have to each other +the space-relationships of their component sense-objects which lie +within that duration.</p> + +<p>Relations bind together: thus thought-objects of perception are +connected in time and in space. The genesis of the objectival analysis +of sense-presentation is the recognition of sense-objects as distinct +terms in time-relations and space-relations: thus thought-objects of +perception are separated by time and by space.</p> + +<p><i>Whole and Part.</i>—A sense-object is part of the complete stream +of presentation. This concept of being a part is merely the statement +of the relation of the sense-object to the complete sense-presentation +for that consciousness. Also a<span class="pagenum" id="Page_159">[Pg 159]</span> sense-object can be part of another +sense-object. It can be a part in two ways, namely, a part in time +and a part in space. It seems probable that both these concepts of +time-part and space-part are fundamental; that is, are concepts +expressing relations which are directly presented to us, and are not +concepts about concepts. In that case no further definition of the +actual presentation is possible. It may even then be possible to +define an adequate criterion of the occurrence of such a presentation. +For example, adopting for the moment a realist metaphysic as to the +existence of the physical world of molecules and electrons, the vision +of a chair as occurring for some definite person at some definite +time is essentially indefinable. It is his vision, though each of us +guesses that it must be uncommonly like our vision under analogous +circumstances. But the existence of the definable molecules and +waves of light in certain definable relations to his bodily organs +of sense, his body also being in a certain definable state, forms an +adequate criterion of the occurrence of the vision, a criterion which +is accepted in Courts of Law and for physical science is tacitly +substituted for the vision.</p> + +<p>The connection between the relations "whole and part" and "all and +some" is intimate. It can be explained thus so far as concerns directly +presented sense-objects. Call two sense-objects<span class="pagenum" id="Page_160">[Pg 160]</span> "separated" if there +is no third sense-object which is a part of both of them. Then an +object A is composed of the two objects B and C, if (1) B and C are +both parts of A, (2) B and C are separated, and (3) there is no part of +A which is separated both from B and from C. In such a case the class +<img style="vertical-align: -0.025ex; width: 1.448ex; height: 1.025ex;" src="images/3.svg" alt="Greek letter alpha." data-tex="\(\alpha\)"> which is composed of the two objects B and C is often substituted +in thought for the sense-object A. But this process presupposes the +fundamental relation "whole and part." Conversely the objects B and C +may be actual sense-objects, but the sense-object A which corresponds +to the class <img style="vertical-align: -0.025ex; width: 1.448ex; height: 1.025ex;" src="images/3.svg" alt="Greek letter alpha." data-tex="\(\alpha\)"> may remain hypothetical. For example, the round world +on which we live remains a conception corresponding to no single +sense-object at any time presented in any human being's consciousness.</p> + +<p>It is possible, however, that some mode of conceiving the +whole-and-part relation between extended objects as the all-and-some +relation of logical classes can be found. But in this case the +extended objects as here conceived cannot be the true sense-objects +which are present to consciousness. For as here conceived a part of a +sense-object is another sense-object of the same type; and therefore +one sense-object cannot be a class of other sense-objects, just as +a tea-spoon cannot be a class of other tea-spoons. The ordinary way +in thought by which whole-and-part is reduced to all-and-some is by +the device<span class="pagenum" id="Page_161">[Pg 161]</span> of points, namely, the part of an object occupies some +of the points occupied by the whole object. If any one holds that +in his consciousness the sense-presentation is a presentation of +point-objects, and that an extended object is merely a class of such +point-objects collected together in thought, then this ordinary method +is completely satisfactory. We shall proceed on the assumption that +this conception of directly perceived point-objects has no relation to +the facts.</p> + +<p>In the preceding address on "The Organisation of Thought," another mode +is suggested. But this method would apply only to the thought-object +of perception, and has no reference to the primary sense-objects here +considered. Accordingly it must reckon as a subordinate device for a +later stage of thought.</p> + +<p>Thus the point-object in time and the point-object in space, and the +double point-object both in time and space, must be conceived as +intellectual constructions. The fundamental fact is the sense-object, +extended both in time and space, with the fundamental relation of +whole-to-part to other such objects, and subject to the law of +convergence to simplicity as we proceed in thought through a series of +successively contained parts.</p> + +<p>The relation whole-to-part is a temporal or spatial relation, and +is therefore primarily a<span class="pagenum" id="Page_162">[Pg 162]</span> relation holding between sense-objects of +perception, and it is only derivatively ascribed to the thought-objects +of perception of which they are components. More generally, space and +time relations hold primarily between sense-objects of perception and +derivatively between thought-objects of perception.</p> + +<p><i>Definition of Points.</i>—The genesis of points of time and of +space can now be studied. We must distinguish (1) sense-time and +sense-space, and (2) thought-time of perception and thought-space of +perception.</p> + +<p>Sense-time and sense-space are the actually observed time-relations +and space-relations between sense-objects. Sense-time and sense-space +have no points except, perhaps, a few sparse instances, sufficient +to suggest the logical idea; also, sense-time and sense-space are +discontinuous and fragmentary.</p> + +<p>Thought-time of perception and thought-space of perception are the time +and space relations which hold between thought-objects of perception. +Thought-time of perception and thought-space of perception are each +continuous. By "continuous" is here meant that all thought-objects of +perception have to each other a time (or space) relation.</p> + +<p>The origin of points is the effort to take full advantage of +the principle of convergence to simplicity. In so far as this +principle does not<span class="pagenum" id="Page_163">[Pg 163]</span> apply, a point is merely a cumbrous way of +directing attention to a set of relations between a certain set of +thought-objects of perception, which set of relations, though actual so +far as a thought-object is actual, is (under this supposition) of no +particular importance. Thus the proved importance in physical science +of the concepts of points in time and points in space is a tribute to +the wide applicability of this principle of convergence.</p> + +<p>Euclid defines a point as without parts and without magnitude. In +modern language a point is often described as an ideal limit by +indefinitely continuing the process of diminishing a volume (or +area). Points as thus conceived are often called convenient fictions. +This language is ambiguous. What is meant by a fiction? If it means +a conception which does not correspond to any fact, there is some +difficulty in understanding how it can be of any use in physical +science. For example, the fiction of a red man in a green coat +inhabiting the moon can never be of the slightest scientific service, +simply because—as we may presume—it corresponds to no fact. By +calling the concept of points a convenient fiction, it must be meant +that the concept does correspond to some important facts. It is, then, +requisite, in the place of such vague allusiveness, to explain exactly +what are the facts to which the concept corresponds.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_164">[Pg 164]</span></p> + +<p>We are not much helped by explaining that a point is an ideal limit. +What is a limit? The idea of a limit has a precise meaning in the +theory of series, and in the theory of the values of functions; but +neither of these meanings apply here. It may be observed that, before +the ordinary mathematical meanings of limit had received a precise +explanation, the idea of a point as a limit might be considered as +one among other examples of an idea only to be apprehended by direct +intuition. This view is not now open to us. Thus, again, we are +confronted with the question: What are the precise properties meant +when a point is described as an ideal limit? The discussion which now +follows is an attempt to express the concept of a point in terms of +thought-objects of perception related together by the whole-and-part +relation, considered either as a time-relation or as a space-relation. +If it is so preferred, it may be considered that the discussion is +directed towards a precise elucidation of the term "ideal limit" as +often used in this connection.</p> + +<p>The subsequent explanations can be made easier to follow by a small +piece of symbolism: Let <i>aEb</i> mean that "<i>b</i> is part of +<i>a</i>." We need not decide whether we are talking of time-parts +or space-parts, but whichever choice is supposed to be made must be +conceived as adhered to throughout any connected discussion. The<span class="pagenum" id="Page_165">[Pg 165]</span> +symbol <i>E</i> may be considered as the initial letter of "encloses," +so we read "<i>aEb</i>" as "<i>a</i> encloses <i>b</i>." Again the +"field of <i>E</i>" is the set of things which either enclose or are +enclosed, <i>i. e.</i> everything "<i>a</i>," which is such that +<i>x</i> can be found so that either <i>aEx</i> or <i>xEa</i>. A member +of the field of <i>E</i> is called "an enclosure-object."</p> + +<p>Now, we assume that this relation of whole-to-part, which in the future +we will call "enclosure," always satisfies the conditions in that the +relation <i>E</i> is (1) transitive, (2) asymmetrical, and (3) with its +domain including its converse domain.</p> + +<p>These four conditions deserve some slight consideration; only the first +two of them embody hypotheses which enter vitally into the reasoning.</p> + +<p>Condition (1) may be stated as the condition that <i>aEb</i> and +<i>bEc</i> always implies <i>aEc</i>. The fact that an entity <i>b</i> +can be found such that <i>aEb</i> and <i>bEc</i> may be conceived +as a relation between <i>a</i> and <i>c</i>. It is natural to write +<i>E</i><sup>2</sup> for this relation. Thus the condition is now written: If +<i>aE</i><sup>2</sup><i>c</i>, then <i>aEc</i>. This can be still otherwise +expressed by saying that the relation <i>E</i><sup>2</sup> implies, whenever it +holds, that the relation <i>E</i> also holds.</p> + +<p>Condition (2) is partly a mere question of trivial definition, and +partly a substantial assumption. The asymmetrical relation (<i>E</i>) +is such that <i>aEb</i> and <i>bEa</i> can never hold simultaneously. +This property splits up into two parts: (1) that<span class="pagenum" id="Page_166">[Pg 166]</span> no instance of +<i>aEb</i> and <i>bEa</i> and "<i>a</i> diverse from <i>b</i>," can +occur, and (2) that <i>aEa</i> cannot occur. The first part is a +substantial assumption, the second part (so far as we are concerned) +reduces to the trivial convention that we shall not consider an object +as part of itself, but will confine attention to "proper parts."</p> + +<p>Condition (3) means that <i>aEb</i> always implies that <i>c</i> can be +found such that <i>bEc</i>. This condition, taken in conjunction with +the fact that we are only considering proper parts, is the assertion of +the principle of the indefinite divisibility of extended objects, both +in space and in time.</p> + +<p>An indivisible part will lack duration in time, and extension in +space, and is thus an entity of essentially a different character +to a divisible part. If we admit such indivisibles as the only true +sense-objects, our subsequent procedure is an unnecessary elaboration.</p> + +<p>It will be found that a fourth condition is necessary owing to +logical difficulties connected with the theory of an infinite number +of choices. It will not be necessary for us to enter further on +this question, which involves difficult considerations of abstract +logic. The outcome is, that apart from hypothesis we cannot prove the +existence of the sets, each containing an infinite number of objects, +which are here called points, as will be explained immediately.</p> + +<p>Now consider a set of enclosure objects which<span class="pagenum" id="Page_167">[Pg 167]</span> is such that (1) +of any two of its members one encloses the other, and (2) there +is no member which is enclosed by all the others, and (3) there +is no enclosure-object, not a member of the set which is enclosed +by every member of the set. Call such a set a "convergent set of +enclosure-objects." As we pass along the series from larger to smaller +members, evidently we converge towards an ideal simplicity to any +degree of approximation to which we like to proceed, and the series as +a whole embodies the complete ideal along that route of approximation. +In fact, to repeat, the series is a <i>route of approximation</i>.</p> + +<p>We have now to inquire if the principle of convergence to simplicity +may be expected to yield the same type of simplicity for every such +convergent route. The answer is, as we might expect, namely, that this +depends upon the nature of the properties which are to be simplified.</p> + +<p>For example, consider the application to time. Now, time is +one-dimensional; so when this property of one-dimensionality has been +expressed by the proper conditions, not here stated, a convergent set +of enclosure-objects must, considered as a route of approximation, +exhibit the properties of one unique instant of time, as ordinarily +conceived by the euclidean definition. Accordingly, whatever simplicity +is to be achieved by the application to time of the principle of +convergence<span class="pagenum" id="Page_168">[Pg 168]</span> to simplicity must be exhibited among the properties of +any such route of approximation.</p> + +<p>For space, different considerations arise. Owing to its multiple +dimensions, we can show that different convergent sets of +enclosure-objects, indicating different routes of approximation, may +exhibit convergence to different types of simplicity, some more complex +than others.</p> + +<p>For example, consider a rectangular box of height <i>h</i> ft., breadth +<i>b</i> ft., and thickness <i>c</i> ft. Now, keep <i>h</i> and +<i>b</i> constant, and let the central plane (height <i>h</i>, breadth +<i>b</i>) perpendicular to the thickness be fixed, then make <i>c</i> +diminish indefinitely. We thus obtain a convergent series of an +indefinitely large number of boxes, and there is no smallest box. Thus +this convergent series exhibits the route of approximation towards the +type of simplicity expressed as being a plane area of height <i>h</i>, +breadth <i>b</i>, and no thickness.</p> + +<p>Again, by keeping the central line of height <i>h</i> fixed, and +by making <i>b</i> and <i>c</i> diminish indefinitely, the series +converges to the segment of a straight line of length <i>h</i>.</p> + +<p>Finally, by keeping only the central point fixed, and by making +<i>h</i>, <i>b</i>, and <i>c</i> diminish indefinitely, the series +converges to a point.</p> + +<p>Furthermore, we have introduced as yet no concept which would prevent +an enclosure-object being formed of detached fragments in space. Thus +we can easily imagine a convergent set<span class="pagenum" id="Page_169">[Pg 169]</span> which converges to a number of +points in space. For example, each object of the set might be formed of +two not overlapping spheres of radius <i>r</i>, with centres <i>A</i> +and <i>B</i>. Then by diminishing <i>r</i> indefinitely, and keeping +<i>A</i> and <i>B</i> fixed, we have convergence to the pair of points +<i>A</i> and <i>B</i>.</p> + +<p>It remains now to consider how those convergent sets which converge to +a single point can be discriminated from all the other types of such +sets, merely by utilising concepts founded on the relation of enclosure.</p> + +<p>Let us name convergent sets by Greek letters; by proceeding "forward" +along any such set let us understand the process of continually passing +from the larger to the smaller enclosure-objects which form the set.</p> + +<p>The convergent set <img style="vertical-align: -0.025ex; width: 1.448ex; height: 1.025ex;" src="images/3.svg" alt="Greek letter alpha." data-tex="\(\alpha\)"> will be said to "cover" the convergent set <img style="vertical-align: -0.439ex; width: 1.281ex; height: 2.034ex;" src="images/4.svg" alt="Greek letter beta." data-tex="\(\beta\)">, if +every member of <img style="vertical-align: -0.025ex; width: 1.448ex; height: 1.025ex;" src="images/3.svg" alt="Greek letter alpha." data-tex="\(\alpha\)"> encloses some members of <img style="vertical-align: -0.439ex; width: 1.281ex; height: 2.034ex;" src="images/4.svg" alt="Greek letter beta." data-tex="\(\beta\)">. We notice that if an +enclosure-object <i>x</i> encloses any member (<i>y</i>) of <img style="vertical-align: -0.439ex; width: 1.281ex; height: 2.034ex;" src="images/4.svg" alt="Greek letter beta." data-tex="\(\beta\)">, then +every member of the "tail-end" of <img style="vertical-align: -0.439ex; width: 1.281ex; height: 2.034ex;" src="images/4.svg" alt="Greek letter beta." data-tex="\(\beta\)">, found by proceeding forward along +<img style="vertical-align: -0.439ex; width: 1.281ex; height: 2.034ex;" src="images/4.svg" alt="Greek letter beta." data-tex="\(\beta\)"> from <i>y</i>, must be enclosed by <i>x</i>. Thus if <img style="vertical-align: -0.025ex; width: 1.448ex; height: 1.025ex;" src="images/3.svg" alt="Greek letter alpha." data-tex="\(\alpha\)"> covers <img style="vertical-align: -0.439ex; width: 1.281ex; height: 2.034ex;" src="images/4.svg" alt="Greek letter beta." data-tex="\(\beta\)">, +every member of <img style="vertical-align: -0.025ex; width: 1.448ex; height: 1.025ex;" src="images/3.svg" alt="Greek letter alpha." data-tex="\(\alpha\)"> encloses every member of the tail-end of <img style="vertical-align: -0.439ex; width: 1.281ex; height: 2.034ex;" src="images/4.svg" alt="Greek letter beta." data-tex="\(\beta\)">, starting +from the largest member of <img style="vertical-align: -0.439ex; width: 1.281ex; height: 2.034ex;" src="images/4.svg" alt="Greek letter beta." data-tex="\(\beta\)"> which is enclosed by that member of <img style="vertical-align: -0.025ex; width: 1.448ex; height: 1.025ex;" src="images/3.svg" alt="Greek letter alpha." data-tex="\(\alpha\)">.</p> + +<p>It is possible for each of two convergent sets to cover the other. For +example, let one set (<img style="vertical-align: -0.025ex; width: 1.448ex; height: 1.025ex;" src="images/3.svg" alt="Greek letter alpha." data-tex="\(\alpha\)">) be a set of concentric spheres converging to +their centre <i>A</i>, and the other set (<img style="vertical-align: -0.439ex; width: 1.281ex; height: 2.034ex;" src="images/4.svg" alt="Greek letter beta." data-tex="\(\beta\)">) be a set<span class="pagenum" id="Page_170">[Pg 170]</span> of concentric +cubes, similarly situated, converging to the same centre <i>A</i>. Then +<img style="vertical-align: -0.025ex; width: 1.448ex; height: 1.025ex;" src="images/3.svg" alt="Greek letter alpha." data-tex="\(\alpha\)"> and <img style="vertical-align: -0.439ex; width: 1.281ex; height: 2.034ex;" src="images/4.svg" alt="Greek letter beta." data-tex="\(\beta\)"> will each cover the other.</p> + +<p>Let two convergent sets which are such that each covers the other be +called "equal."</p> + +<p>Then it is a sufficient condition to secure that a convergent set +<img style="vertical-align: -0.025ex; width: 1.448ex; height: 1.025ex;" src="images/3.svg" alt="Greek letter alpha." data-tex="\(\alpha\)"> possesses the point type of convergence, if every convergent set +covered by it is also equal to it, namely, <img style="vertical-align: -0.025ex; width: 1.448ex; height: 1.025ex;" src="images/3.svg" alt="Greek letter alpha." data-tex="\(\alpha\)"> is a convergent set with +the punctual type of convergence, if "<img style="vertical-align: -0.025ex; width: 1.448ex; height: 1.025ex;" src="images/3.svg" alt="Greek letter alpha." data-tex="\(\alpha\)"> covers <img style="vertical-align: -0.439ex; width: 1.281ex; height: 2.034ex;" src="images/4.svg" alt="Greek letter beta." data-tex="\(\beta\)">" always implies that <img style="vertical-align: -0.439ex; width: 1.281ex; height: 2.034ex;" src="images/4.svg" alt="Greek letter beta." data-tex="\(\beta\)"> +covers <img style="vertical-align: -0.025ex; width: 1.448ex; height: 1.025ex;" src="images/3.svg" alt="Greek letter alpha." data-tex="\(\alpha\)">.</p> + +<p>It can easily be seen by simple examples that the other types of +convergence to surfaces or lines or sets of points cannot possess this +property. Consider, for example, the three convergent sets of boxes in +the preceding illustration, which converge respectively to a central +plane, a central line in the central plane, and the central point in +the central line. The first set covers the second and third sets, and +the second set covers the third set, but no two of the sets are equal.</p> + +<p>It is a more difficult question to determine whether the condition here +indicated as sufficient to secure the punctual type of convergence +is also necessary. The question turns on how far thought-objects +of perception possess exact boundaries prior to the elaboration of +exact mathematical concepts of space. If they are to be conceived as +possessing such exact boundaries,<span class="pagenum" id="Page_171">[Pg 171]</span> then convergent sets converging to +points on such boundaries must be allowed for. The procedure necessary +for the specification of the complete punctual condition becomes then +very elaborate,<a id="FNanchor_3" href="#Footnote_3" class="fnanchor">[3]</a> and will not be considered here.</p> + +<p>But such exact determination as is involved in the conception of +an exact spatial boundary does not seem to belong to the true +thought-object of perception. The ascription of an exact boundary +really belongs to the transition stage of thought as it passes from +the thought-object of perception to the thought-object of science. +The transition from the sense-object immediately presented to the +thought-object of perception is historically made in a wavering +indeterminate line of thought. The definite stages here marked out +simply serve to prove that a logically explicable transition is +possible.</p> + +<p>We accordingly assume that the condition laid down above to secure the +punctual convergence of a convergent set of enclosure-objects is not +only sufficient, but necessary.</p> + +<p>It can be proved that, if two convergent sets of enclosure-objects are +both equal to a third convergent set, they are equal to each other. +Consider now any punctual convergent set (<img style="vertical-align: -0.025ex; width: 1.448ex; height: 1.025ex;" src="images/3.svg" alt="Greek letter alpha." data-tex="\(\alpha\)">). We want to define the +"point" to which <img style="vertical-align: -0.025ex; width: 1.448ex; height: 1.025ex;" src="images/3.svg" alt="Greek letter alpha." data-tex="\(\alpha\)"> is<span class="pagenum" id="Page_172">[Pg 172]</span> a route of approximation in a way which is +neutral between <img style="vertical-align: -0.025ex; width: 1.448ex; height: 1.025ex;" src="images/3.svg" alt="Greek letter alpha." data-tex="\(\alpha\)"> and all the convergent sets which are equal to <img style="vertical-align: -0.025ex; width: 1.448ex; height: 1.025ex;" src="images/3.svg" alt="Greek letter alpha." data-tex="\(\alpha\)">. +Each of these sets is a route of approximation to the same "point" +as <img style="vertical-align: -0.025ex; width: 1.448ex; height: 1.025ex;" src="images/3.svg" alt="Greek letter alpha." data-tex="\(\alpha\)">. This definition is secured if we define the point as the class +formed by all the enclosure-objects which belong either to <img style="vertical-align: -0.025ex; width: 1.448ex; height: 1.025ex;" src="images/3.svg" alt="Greek letter alpha." data-tex="\(\alpha\)"> or to +any convergent set which is equal to <img style="vertical-align: -0.025ex; width: 1.448ex; height: 1.025ex;" src="images/3.svg" alt="Greek letter alpha." data-tex="\(\alpha\)">. Let <i>P</i> be this class +of enclosure-objects. Then any convergent set (<img style="vertical-align: -0.439ex; width: 1.281ex; height: 2.034ex;" src="images/4.svg" alt="Greek letter beta." data-tex="\(\beta\)">) which consists of +enclosure-objects entirely selected from members of the class <i>P</i> +must be a route of approximation to the same "point" as does the +original punctual set <img style="vertical-align: -0.025ex; width: 1.448ex; height: 1.025ex;" src="images/3.svg" alt="Greek letter alpha." data-tex="\(\alpha\)">; namely, provided that we choose a small enough +enclosure-object in <img style="vertical-align: -0.439ex; width: 1.281ex; height: 2.034ex;" src="images/4.svg" alt="Greek letter beta." data-tex="\(\beta\)">, we can always find a member of <img style="vertical-align: -0.025ex; width: 1.448ex; height: 1.025ex;" src="images/3.svg" alt="Greek letter alpha." data-tex="\(\alpha\)"> which encloses +it; and provided that we choose a small enough enclosure-object in +<img style="vertical-align: -0.025ex; width: 1.448ex; height: 1.025ex;" src="images/3.svg" alt="Greek letter beta." data-tex="\(\alpha\)">, we can always find a member of <img style="vertical-align: -0.439ex; width: 1.281ex; height: 2.034ex;" src="images/4.svg" alt="Greek letter beta." data-tex="\(\beta\)"> which encloses it. Thus <i>P</i> +only includes convergent sets of the punctual type, and the route +of approximation indicated by any two convergent sets selected from +<i>P</i> converges to identical results.</p> + +<p><i>The Uses of Points.</i>—The sole use of points is to facilitate +the employment of the principle of Convergence to Simplicity. By this +principle some simple relations in appropriate circumstances become +true, when objects are considered which are sufficiently restricted in +time or in space. The introduction of points enables this principle to +be carried through to its ideal limit.<span class="pagenum" id="Page_173">[Pg 173]</span> For example, suppose +<i>g</i>(<i>a</i>, <i>b</i>, <i>c</i>) represents some statement concerning +three enclosure-objects, <i>a</i>, <i>b</i>, <i>c</i>, which may +be true if the objects are sufficiently restricted in extent. Let +<i>A</i>, <i>B</i>, <i>C</i> be three given points, then we define +<i>g</i>(<i>A</i>, <i>B</i>, <i>C</i>) to mean that <i>whatever</i> +three enclosure-objects <i>a</i>, <i>b</i>, <i>c</i> are chosen, such +that <i>a</i> is a member of <i>A</i>, <i>b</i> of <i>B</i>, and +<i>c</i> of <i>C</i>, it is <i>always possible</i> to find three other +members of <i>A</i>, <i>B</i>, <i>C</i>, namely, <i>x</i> a member of +<i>A</i>, <i>y</i> of <i>B</i>, and <i>z</i> of <i>C</i>, such that +<i>aEx</i>, <i>bEy</i>, <i>cEz</i>, and <i>g</i>(<i>x</i>, <i>y</i>, +<i>z</i>). So by going far enough down in the tail-ends of <i>A</i>, +<i>B</i>, <i>C</i> we can always secure three objects <i>x</i>, +<i>y</i>, <i>z</i> for which <i>g</i>(<i>x</i>, <i>y</i>, <i>z</i>) is +true.</p> + +<p>For example, let <i>g</i>(<i>A</i>, <i>B</i>, <i>C</i>) mean +"<i>A</i>, <i>B</i>, <i>C</i> are three points in a linear row." +This must be construed to mean that whatever three objects <i>a</i>, +<i>b</i>, <i>c</i> we choose, members of <i>A</i>, <i>B</i>, <i>C</i> +respectively, we can always find three objects <i>x</i>, <i>y</i>, +<i>z</i>, also members of <i>A</i>, <i>B</i>, <i>C</i> respectively, +and such that <i>a</i> encloses <i>x</i>, <i>b</i> encloses <i>y</i>, +<i>c</i> encloses <i>z</i>, and also such that <i>x</i>, <i>y</i>, +<i>z</i> are in a linear row.</p> + +<p>Sometimes a double convergence is necessary, namely, a convergence of +conditions as well as a convergence of objects. For example, consider +the statement, "the points <i>A</i> and <i>B</i> are two feet apart." +Now, the exact statement "two feet apart" does not apply to objects. +For objects <i>x</i> and <i>y</i> we must substitute the statement, +"the distance between <i>x</i> and <i>y</i> lies between the limits<span class="pagenum" id="Page_174">[Pg 174]</span> +(2 ± <i>e</i>) feet." Here <i>e</i> is some number, less than two, +which we have chosen for this statement. Then the points <i>A</i> +and <i>B</i> are two feet apart; if, <i>however we choose the number +e</i>, whatever enclosure-objects <i>a</i> and <i>b</i>, members +of <i>A</i> and <i>B</i> respectively, we consider, we can always +find enclosure-objects <i>x</i> and <i>y</i>, members of <i>A</i> +and <i>B</i> respectively, such that <i>a</i> encloses <i>x</i> and +<i>b</i> encloses <i>y</i>, and also such that the distance between +<i>x</i> and <i>y</i> lies between the limits (2 ± <i>e</i>) feet. +It is evident, since <i>e</i> can be chosen as small as we please, +that this statement exactly expresses the condition that <i>A</i> and +<i>B</i> are two feet apart.</p> + +<p><i>Straight Lines and Planes.</i>—But the problem of the intellectual +construction of straight lines and planes is not yet sufficiently +analysed. We have interpreted the meaning of the statement that three +or more points are collinear, and can similarly see how to interpret +the meaning of the statement that four or more points are coplanar, +in either case deriving the exact geometrical statements from vaguer +statements respecting extended objects.</p> + +<p>This procedure only contemplates groups of finite numbers of points. +But straight lines and planes are conceived as containing infinite +numbers of points. This completion of lines and planes is obtained +by a renewed application of the principle of aggregation, just as +a set of first crude thought-objects of perception are aggregated<span class="pagenum" id="Page_175">[Pg 175]</span> +into one complete thought-object of perception. In this way repeated +judgments of the collinearity of sets of points are finally, when +certain conditions of interlacing are fulfilled, aggregated in the +single judgment of all the points of the groups as forming one whole +collinear group. Similarly for judgments of coplanarity. This process +of logical aggregation can be exhibited in its exact logical analysis. +But it is unnecessary here to proceed to such details. Thus we conceive +our points as sorted into planes and straight lines, concerning which +the various axioms of geometry hold. These axioms, in so far as they +essentially require the conception of points, are capable of being +exhibited as the outcome of vaguer, less exact judgments respecting the +relations of extended objects.</p> + +<p><i>Empty Space.</i>—It must be observed that the points, hitherto +defined, necessarily involve thought-objects of perception, and lie +within the space-extension occupied by such objects. It is true that +such objects are largely hypothetical, and that we can bring into our +hypotheses sufficient objects to complete our lines and planes. But +every such hypothesis weakens the connection between our scientific +concept of nature and the actual observed facts which are involved in +the actual sense-presentations.</p> + +<p>Occam's razor, <i>Entia non multiplicanda præter necessitatem</i>, +is not an arbitrary rule based on<span class="pagenum" id="Page_176">[Pg 176]</span> mere logical elegancy. Nor is its +application purely confined to metaphysical speculation. I am ignorant +of the precise reason for its metaphysical validity, but its scientific +validity is obvious, namely, every use of hypothetical entities +diminishes the claim of scientific reasoning to be the necessary +outcome of a harmony between thought and sense-presentation. As +hypothesis increases, necessity diminishes.</p> + +<p>Commonsense thought also supports this refusal to conceive of all +space as essentially depending on hypothetical objects which fill it. +We think of material objects as filling space, but we ask whether any +objects exist between the Earth and the Sun, between the stars, or +beyond the stars. For us, space is there; the only question is whether +or not it be full. But this form of question presupposes the meaning of +empty space, namely, of space not containing hypothetical objects.</p> + +<p>This brings up a wider use of the concept of points, necessitating +a wider definition. Hitherto we have conceived points as indicating +relations of enclosure between objects. We thus arrive at what now +we will term "material points." But the idea of points can now be +transformed so as to indicate the possibilities of external relations +not those of enclosure. This is effected by an enlargement of the +concept of ideal points, already known to geometers.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_177">[Pg 177]</span></p> + +<p>Define "material lines" to be complete collinear classes of collinear +points. Consider now the set of material lines which contain a certain +material point. Call such a set of lines an ideal point. This set of +lines indicates a possibility of position, which is in fact occupied +by that material point common to all the material lines. So this ideal +point is an occupied ideal point. Now consider a set of three material +lines, such that any two are coplanar, but not the whole three, and +further consider the complete set of material lines such that each is +coplanar with each of the three material lines first chosen. The axioms +which hold for the material lines will enable us to prove that any two +lines of this set are coplanar. Then the whole set of lines, including +the three original lines, forms an ideal point, according to the +definition in its full generality. Such an ideal point may be occupied. +In that case there is a material point common to all the lines of the +set, but it may be unoccupied. Then the ideal point merely indicates +a possibility of spatial relations which has not been realised. It is +the point of empty space. Thus the ideal points, which may or may not +be occupied, are the points of geometry viewed as an applied science. +These points are distributed into straight lines and planes. But any +further discussion of this question will lead us into the technical +subject of the axioms of<span class="pagenum" id="Page_178">[Pg 178]</span> geometry and their immediate consequences. +Enough has been said to show how geometry arises according to the +relational theory of space.</p> + +<p>Space as thus conceived is the thought-space of the material world.</p> + + +<p class="nindc space-above2"><i>IV. Fields of Force</i></p> + +<p>The thought-objects of science are conceived as directly related to +this thought-space. Their spatial relations are among those indicated +by the points of the thought-space. Their emergence in science has +been merely a further development of processes already inherent in +commonsense thought.</p> + +<p>Relations within the complete sense-presentation were represented +in thought by the concept of thought-objects of perception. All +sense-presentation could not be represented in this way; also the +change and disappearance of thought-objects occasioned confusion +of thought. A reduction to order of this confusion was attempted +by the concepts of permanent matter with primary and secondary +qualities. Finally, this has issued in the secondary qualities being +traced as perception of events generated by the objects, but—as +perceived—entirely disconnected with them. Also the thought-objects +of perception<span class="pagenum" id="Page_179">[Pg 179]</span> have been replaced by molecules and electrons and +ether-waves, until at length it is never the thought-object of science +which is perceived, but complicated series of events in which they are +implicated. If science be right, nobody ever perceived a thing, but +only an event. The result is, that the older language of philosophy +which still survives in many quarters is now thoroughly confusing +when brought into connection with the modern concepts of science. +Philosophy—that is, the older philosophy—conceives the thing as +directly perceived. According to scientific thought, the ultimate thing +is never perceived, perception essentially issuing from a series of +events. It is impossible to reconcile the two points of view.</p> + +<p>The advantage of the modern scientific concept is that it is enabled +to "explain" the fluid vague outlines of sense-presentation. The +thought-object of perception is now conceived as a fairly stable +state of motion of a huge group of molecules, constantly changing, +but preserving a certain identity of characteristics. Also stray +sense-objects, not immediately given as part of a thought-object of +perception, are now explicable: the dancing light-reflection, the +vaguely heard sound, the smell. In fact, the perceived events of +the scientific world have the same general definition and lack of +definition, and the same general stability and lack of stability, +as<span class="pagenum" id="Page_180">[Pg 180]</span> the sense-objects of the complete sense-presentation or as the +thought-objects of perception.</p> + +<p>The thought-objects of science, namely, molecules, atoms, and +electrons, have gained in permanence. The events are reduced to changes +in space-configuration. The laws determining these changes are the +ultimate laws of nature.</p> + +<p>The laws of change in the physical universe proceed on the assumption +that the preceding states of the universe determine the character of +the change. Thus, to know the configurations and events of the universe +up to and including any instant would involve sufficient data from +which to determine the succession of events throughout all time.</p> + +<p>But in tracing the antecedents of events, commonsense thought, dealing +with the world of thought-objects of perception, habitually assumes +that the greater number of antecedent events can be neglected as +irrelevant. Consideration of causes is restricted to a few events +during a short preceding interval. Finally, in scientific thought it +has been assumed that the events in an arbitrarily small preceding +duration are sufficient. Thus physical quantities and their successive +differential co-efficients up to any order at the instant, but with +their limiting values just before that instant, are on this theory +sufficient to determine the state of the universe at all times after +the instant. More<span class="pagenum" id="Page_181">[Pg 181]</span> particular laws are assumed. But the search for +them is guided by this general principle. Also it is assumed that the +greater number of events in the physical universe are irrelevant to +the production of any particular effect, which is assumed to issue +from relatively few antecedents. These assumptions have grown out of +the experience of mankind. The first lesson of life is to concentrate +attention on few factors of sense-presentations, and on still fewer of +the universe of thought-objects of perception.</p> + +<p>The principle by which—consciously or unconsciously—thought has been +guided is that in searching for particular causes, remoteness in time +and remoteness in space are evidences of comparative disconnection +of influence. The extreme form of this principle is the denial of +any action at a distance either in time or space. The difficulty in +accepting this principle in its crude form is, that since there are no +contiguous points, only coincident bodies can act on each other. I can +see no answer to this difficulty—namely, either bodies have the same +location and are thus coincident, or they have different locations and +are thus at a distance and do not act on each other.</p> + +<p>This difficulty is not evaded by the hypothesis of an ether, +continuously distributed. For two reasons: in the first place, the +continuity of the ether does not avoid the dilemma; and<span class="pagenum" id="Page_182">[Pg 182]</span> secondly, the +difficulty applies to time as well as to space, and the dilemma would +prove that causation producing change is impossible, namely, no changed +condition could be the result of antecedent circumstances.</p> + +<p>On the other hand, a direct interaction between two bodies separated +in space undoubtedly offends the conception of distance as implying +physical disconnection as well as spatial relation. There is no logical +difficulty in the assumption of action at a distance as in the case +of its denial, but it is contradictory to persistent assumptions of +that apparatus of commonsense thought which it is the main business +of science to harmonise with sense-presentation, employing only the +minimum of modification.</p> + +<p>Modern science is really unconcerned with this debate. Its +(unacknowledged) conceptions are really quite different, though the +verbal explanations retain the form of a previous epoch. The point of +the change in conception is that the old thought-object of science was +conceived as possessing a simplicity not belonging to the material +universe as a whole. It was secluded within a finite region of space, +and changes in its circumstances could only arise from forces which +formed no essential part of its nature. An ether was called into +existence to explain the active relations between these passive +thought-objects. The whole conception suffers from the logical<span class="pagenum" id="Page_183">[Pg 183]</span> +difficulties noted above. Also no clear conception can be formed of +the sense in which the ether is explanatory. It is to possess a type +of activity denied to the original thought-object, namely, it carries +potential energy, whereas the atom possessed only kinetic energy, +the so-called potential energy of an atom belonging really to the +surrounding ether. The truth is, that ether is really excepted from the +axiom "no action at a distance," and the axiom thereby is robbed of all +its force.</p> + +<p>The modern thought-object of science—not yet explicitly +acknowledged—has the complexity of the whole material universe. In +physics, as elsewhere, the hopeless endeavour to derive complexity +from simplicity has been tacitly abandoned. What is aimed at is not +simplicity, but persistence and regularity. In a sense regularity +is a sort of simplicity. But it is the simplicity of stable mutual +relations, and not the simplicity of absence of types of internal +structure or of type of relation. This thought-object fills all space. +It is a "field"; that is to say, it is a certain distribution of +scalar and vector quantities throughout space, these quantities having +each its value for each point of space at each point of time, being +continuously distributed throughout space and throughout time, possibly +with some exceptional discontinuities. The various types of quantity +which form the field have fixed<span class="pagenum" id="Page_184">[Pg 184]</span> relations to each other at each point +of time and space. These relations are the ultimate laws of nature.</p> + +<p>For example, consider an electron. There is a scalar distribution +of electricity, which is what is ordinarily called the electron. +This scalar distribution has a volume-density <img style="vertical-align: -0.489ex; width: 1.17ex; height: 1.489ex;" src="images/5.svg" alt="Greek letter rho." data-tex="\(\rho\)"> at the time <i>t</i> +at any point (<i>x</i>, <i>y</i>, <i>z</i>). Thus <img style="vertical-align: -0.489ex; width: 1.17ex; height: 1.489ex;" src="images/5.svg" alt="Greek letter rho." data-tex="\(\rho\)"> is a function +of (<i>x</i>, <i>y</i>, <i>z</i>, <i>t</i>), which is zero except +within a restricted region. Furthermore, at any time <i>t</i>, as an +essential adjunct, there is a continuous space distribution at each +point of the two vectors (<i>X</i>, <i>Y</i>, <i>Z</i>), which is the +electric force, and (<img style="vertical-align: -0.489ex; width: 5.969ex; height: 2.084ex;" src="images/6.svg" alt="Greek letters alpha, beta and gamma." data-tex="\(\alpha, \beta, \gamma\)">), which is the magnetic force. Lastly, +individuality is ascribed to the scalar electric distribution, so that +in addition to its conservation of quantity—involved in the assumed +laws—it is also possible to assign the velocities with which the +various individual parts of the distribution are moving. Let (<i>u</i>, +<i>v</i>, <i>w</i>) be this velocity at (<i>x</i>, <i>y</i>, <i>z</i>, +<i>t</i>).</p> + +<p>This whole scheme of scalar and vector quantities, namely, <img style="vertical-align: -0.489ex; width: 1.17ex; height: 1.489ex;" src="images/5.svg" alt="Greek letter rho." data-tex="\(\rho\)">, +(<i>X</i>, <i>Y</i>, <i>Z</i>), (<img style="vertical-align: -0.489ex; width: 5.969ex; height: 2.084ex;" src="images/6.svg" alt="Greek letters alpha, beta and gamma." data-tex="\(\alpha, \beta, \gamma\)">), (<i>u</i>, <i>v</i>, +<i>w</i>) is interconnected by the electromagnetic laws. It follows +from these laws that the electron, in the sense of the scalar +distribution <img style="vertical-align: -0.489ex; width: 1.17ex; height: 1.489ex;" src="images/5.svg" alt="Greek letter rho." data-tex="\(\rho\)">, is to be conceived as at each instant propagating from +itself an emanation which travels outwards with the velocity of light +<i>in vacuo</i>, and from which (<i>X</i>, <i>Y</i>, <i>Z</i>) and +(<img style="vertical-align: -0.489ex; width: 5.969ex; height: 2.084ex;" src="images/6.svg" alt="Greek letters alpha, beta and gamma." data-tex="\(\alpha, \beta, \gamma\)">) can be calculated, so far as they are due to +that electron. Thus the field,<span class="pagenum" id="Page_185">[Pg 185]</span> +at any time, due to the electron as a whole depends on the +previous history of the electron, the nearer to the electron the more +recent being the relevant history. The whole scheme of such a field is +one single thought-object of science: the electron and its emanations +form one essential whole, namely one thought-object of science, +essentially complex and essentially filling all space. The electron +proper, namely, the scalar distribution <img style="vertical-align: -0.489ex; width: 1.17ex; height: 1.489ex;" src="images/5.svg" alt="Greek letter rho." data-tex="\(\rho\)">, is the focus of the +whole, the essential focal property being that the field at any instant +is completely determined by the previous history of the focus and of +its space relations through all previous time. But the field and the +focus are not independent concepts, they are essentially correlated in +one organised unity, namely, they are essentially correlated terms in +the field of one relation in virtue of which the entities enter into +our thoughts.</p> + +<p>The fields of a group of electrons are superposed according to the +linear law for aggregation, namely, pure addition for analogous scalar +quantities and the parallelogram law for analogous vectors. The changes +in motion of each electron depend entirely on the resultant field in +the region it occupies. Thus a field can be viewed as a possibility of +action, but a possibility which represents an actuality.</p> + +<p>It is to be noted that the two alternative views of causation are +here both included. The<span class="pagenum" id="Page_186">[Pg 186]</span> complete field within any region of space +depends on the past histories of all the electrons, histories extending +backwards in proportion to their distances. Also this dependence can +be conceived as a transmission. But viewing the cause which effects +changes on the electron within that region, it is solely that field +within the region, which field is coincident with that electron both in +time and in space.</p> + +<p>This process of conceiving the actuality underlying a possibility is +the uniform process by which regularity and permanence is introduced +into scientific thought, namely, we proceed from the actuality of the +fact to the actuality of possibility.</p> + +<p>In conformity with this principle, propositions are the outgrowth +from actual thought-expressions, thought-objects of perceptions from +crude sense-objects, hypothetical thought-objects of perception from +actual thought-objects of perception, material points from hypothetical +infinite suites of hypothetical thought-objects of perception, +ideal points from material points, thought-objects of science from +thought-objects of perception, fields of electrons from actual mutual +reactions of actual electrons.</p> + +<p>The process is a research for permanence, uniformity, and simplicity +of logical relation. But it does not issue in simplicity of internal +structure. Each ultimate thought-object of science<span class="pagenum" id="Page_187">[Pg 187]</span> retains every +quality attributed to the whole scientific universe, but retains them +in a form characterised by permanence and uniformity.</p> + + +<p class="nindc space-above2"><i>V. Conclusion</i></p> + +<p>We commenced by excluding judgments of worth and ontological judgments. +We conclude by recalling them. Judgments of worth are no part of +the texture of physical science, but they are part of the motive of +its production. Mankind have raised the edifice of science, because +they have judged it worth while. In other words, the motives involve +innumerable judgments of value. Again, there has been conscious +selection of the parts of the scientific field to be cultivated, and +this conscious selection involves judgments of value. These values may +be æsthetic, or moral, or utilitarian, namely, judgments as to the +beauty of the structure, or as to the duty of exploring the truth, or +as to utility in the satisfaction of physical wants. But whatever the +motive, without judgments of value there would have been no science.</p> + +<p>Again, ontological judgments were not excluded by reason of any lack +of interest. They are in fact presupposed in every act of life: in our +affections, in our self-restraints, and in our constructive efforts. +They are presupposed in moral judgments. The difficulty about them is +the<span class="pagenum" id="Page_188">[Pg 188]</span> absence of agreement as to the method of harmonising the crude +judgments of commonsense.</p> + +<p>Science does not diminish the need of a metaphysic. Where this need is +most insistent is in connection with what above has been termed "the +actuality underlying a possibility." A few words of explanation may +render the argument clearer, although they involve a rash approach +to metaphysical heights which it is not the purpose of this paper to +explore.</p> + +<p>The conception of subject and object in careless discussion covers +two distinct relations. There is the relation of the whole perceiving +consciousness to part of its own content, for example, the relation +of a perceiving consciousness to an object of redness apparent to it. +There is also the relation of a perceiving consciousness to an entity +which does not exist in virtue of being part of the content of that +consciousness. Such a relation, so far as known to the perceiving +consciousness, must be an inferred relation, the inference being +derived from an analysis of the content of the perceiving consciousness.</p> + +<p>The bases for such inferences must be elements in consciousness +directly known as transcending their immediate presentation in +consciousness. Such elements are universal logical truths, moral and +æsthetic truths, and truths embodied in<span class="pagenum" id="Page_189">[Pg 189]</span> hypothetical propositions. +These are the immediate objects of perception which are other than the +mere affections of the perceiving subject. They have the property of +being parts of the immediate presentations for individual subjects and +yet more than such parts. All other existence is inferred existence.</p> + +<p>In this chapter we are more directly concerned with truths embodied +in hypothetical propositions. Such truths must not be confused with +any doubtfulness which attaches to our judgments of the future course +of natural phenomena. A hypothetical proposition, like a categorical +judgment, may or may not be doubtful. Also like a categorial judgment, +it expresses a fact. This fact is twofold: as a presentation in +consciousness, it is just this hypothetical judgment; as expressing a +categorical fact, it states a relation which lies beyond consciousness, +holding between entities thereby inferred.</p> + +<p>But this metaphysical analysis, short though it be, is probably wrong, +and at the best will only command very partial assent. Certainly; +and this admission brings out the very point which I wished to make. +Physical science is based on elements of thought, such as judgments +registering actual perceptions, and judgments registering hypothetical +perceptions which under certain circumstances would be realised.<span class="pagenum" id="Page_190">[Pg 190]</span> +These elements form the agreed content of the apparatus of commonsense +thought. They require metaphysical analysis; but they are among the +data from which metaphysics starts. A metaphysic which rejects them +has failed, in the same way as physical science has failed when it is +unable to harmonise them into its theory.</p> + +<p>Science only renders the metaphysical need more urgent. In itself +it contributes little directly to the solution of the metaphysical +problem. But it does contribute something, namely, the exposition of +the fact that our experience of sensible apparent things is capable of +being analysed into a scientific theory, a theory not indeed complete, +but giving every promise of indefinite expansion. This achievement +emphasises the intimate relation between our logical thought and the +facts of sensible apprehension. Also the special form of scientific +theory is bound to have some influence. In the past false science +has been the parent of bad metaphysics. After all, science embodies +a rigorous scrutiny of one part of the whole evidence from which +metaphysicians deduce their conclusions.</p> + + +<div class="footnotes"><h3>FOOTNOTES:</h3> + +<div class="footnote"> + +<p class="nind"><a id="Footnote_3" href="#FNanchor_3" class="label">[3]</a> +Cf. <i>Révue de Métaphysique et de Morale</i>, May 1916, +where this question is dealt with by the author at the end of an +article, "La théorie relationniste de l'espace."</p> + +</div> +</div> + + +<hr class="chap x-ebookmaker-drop"> + +<div class="chapter"> +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_191">[Pg 191]</span></p> +<h2 class="nobreak" id="CHAPTER_VIII">CHAPTER VIII<br> +SPACE, TIME, AND RELATIVITY</h2> +</div> + +<div class="blockquot"> + +<p class="nindc space-below2"> +(<i>Paper read to Section A at the Manchester Meeting of the British +Association, 1915, and later before the Aristotelian Society</i>)</p> +</div> + + +<p>FUNDAMENTAL Problems concerning space and time have been considered +from the standpoints created by many different sciences. The object of +this paper is the humble one of bringing some of these standpoints into +relation with each other. This necessitates a very cursory treatment of +each point of view.</p> + +<p>Mathematical physicists have evolved their theory of relativity to +explain the negative results of the Morley-Michelson experiment and of +the Trouton experiment. Experimental psychologists have considered the +evolution of spatial ideas from the crude sense-data of experience. +Metaphysicians have considered the majestic uniformity of space and +time, without beginning and without end, without boundaries, and +without exception in the truths concerning them; all these qualities +the more arresting to our attention from the confused accidental +nature<span class="pagenum" id="Page_192">[Pg 192]</span> of the empirical universe which is conditioned by them. +Mathematicians have studied the axioms of geometry, and can now deduce +all that is believed to be universally true of space and of time by the +strictest logic from a limited number of assumptions.</p> + +<p>These various lines of thought have been evolved with surprisingly +little interconnection. Perhaps it is as well. The results of science +are never quite true. By a healthy independence of thought perhaps we +sometimes avoid adding other people's errors to our own. But there can +be no doubt that the normal method of cross-fertilising thought is by +considering the same, or allied problems to our own, in the form which +they assume in other sciences.</p> + +<p>Here I do not propose to enter into a systematic study of these various +chapters of science. I have neither the knowledge nor the time.</p> + +<p>First, let us take the ultimate basis of any theory of relativity. +All space measurement is from stuff in space to stuff in space. The +geometrical entities of empty space never appear. The only geometrical +properties of which we have any direct knowledge are properties of +those shifting, changeable appearances which we call things in space. +It is the sun which is distant, and the ball which is round, and the +lamp-posts which are in linear order. Wherever mankind may have got its +idea of an infinite unchangeable<span class="pagenum" id="Page_193">[Pg 193]</span> space from, it is safe to say that it +is not an immediate deliverance of direct observation.</p> + +<p>There are two antagonistic philosophical ways of recognising this +conclusion.</p> + +<p>One is to affirm that space and time are conditions for sensible +experience, that without projection into space and time sensible +experience would not exist. Thus, although it may be true to say that +our knowledge of space and time is given in experience, it is not true +to say that it is deduced from experience in the same sense that the +Law of Gravitation is so deduced. It is not deduced, because in the act +of experiencing we are necessarily made aware of space as an infinite +given whole, and of time as an unending uniform succession. This +philosophical position is expressed by saying that space and time are +<i>a priori</i> forms of sensibility.</p> + +<p>The opposed philosophical method of dealing with the question is +to affirm that our concepts of time and space are deductions from +experience, in exactly the same way as the Law of Gravitation is such +a deduction. If we form exact concepts of points, lines and surfaces, +and of successive instants of time, and assume them to be related as +expressed by the axioms of geometry and the axioms for time, then we +find that we have framed a concept which, with all the exactness of +which our observations are capable, expresses the facts of experience.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_194">[Pg 194]</span></p> + +<p>These two philosophic positions are each designed to explain a +certain difficulty. The <i>a priori</i> theory explains the absolute +universality ascribed to the laws of space and time, a universality +not ascribed to any deduction from experience. The experiential theory +explains the derivation of the space-time concepts without introducing +any other factors beyond those which are admittedly present in framing +the other concepts of physical science.</p> + +<p>But we have not yet done with the distinctions which in any discussion +of space or time must essentially be kept in mind. Put aside the +above question as to how these space-time concepts are related to +experience—What are they when they are formed?</p> + +<p>We may conceive of the points of space as self-subsistent entities +which have the indefinable relation of being occupied by the ultimate +stuff (matter, I will call it) which is there. Thus, to say that the +sun is <i>there</i> (wherever it is) is to affirm the relation of +occupation between the set of positive and negative electrons which +we call the sun and a certain set of points, the points having an +existence essentially independent of the sun. This is the absolute +theory of space. The absolute theory is not popular just now, but it +has very respectable authority on its side—Newton, for one—so treat +it tenderly.</p> + +<p>The other theory is associated with Leibniz.<span class="pagenum" id="Page_195">[Pg 195]</span> Our space concepts are +concepts of relations between things in space. Thus there is no such +entity as a self-subsistent point. A point is merely the name for some +peculiarity of the relations between the matter which is, in common +language, said to be in space.</p> + +<p>It follows from the relative theory that a point should be definable in +terms of the relations between material things. So far as I am aware, +this outcome of the theory has escaped the notice of mathematicians, +who have invariably assumed the point as the ultimate starting ground +of their reasoning. Many years ago I explained some types of ways in +which we might achieve such a definition, and more recently have added +some others. Similar explanations apply to time. Before the theories +of space and time have been carried to a satisfactory conclusion on +the relational basis, a long and careful scrutiny of the definitions +of points of space and instants of time will have to be undertaken, +and many ways of effecting these definitions will have to be tried and +compared. This is an unwritten chapter of mathematics, in much the same +state as was the theory of parallels in the eighteenth century.</p> + +<p>In this connection I should like to draw attention to the analogy +between time and space. In analysing our experience we distinguish +events, and we also distinguish things whose changing<span class="pagenum" id="Page_196">[Pg 196]</span> relations form +the events. If I had time it would be interesting to consider more +closely these concepts of events and of things. It must suffice now to +point out that things have certain relations to each other which we +consider as relations between the space extensions of the things; for +example, one space can contain the other, or exclude it, or overlap +it. A point in space is nothing else than a certain set of relations +between spatial extensions.</p> + +<p>Analogously, there are certain relations between events which we +express by saying that they are relations between the temporal +durations of these events, that is, between the temporal extensions of +the events. [The durations of two events A and B may one precede the +other, or may partially overlap, or may one contain the other, giving +in all six possibilities.] The properties of the extension of an event +in time are largely analogous to the extension of an object in space. +Spatial extensions are expressed by relations between objects, temporal +extensions by relations between events.</p> + +<p>The point in time is a set of relations between temporal extensions. +It needs very little reflection to convince us that a point in time +is no direct deliverance of experience. We live in durations, and not +in points. But what community, beyond the mere name, is there between +extension in time and extension in space? In<span class="pagenum" id="Page_197">[Pg 197]</span> view of the intimate +connection between time and space revealed by the modern theory of +relativity, this question has taken on a new importance.</p> + +<p>I have not thought out an answer to this question. I suggest, however, +that time and space embody those relations between objects on which +depends our judgment of their externality to ourselves. Namely, +location in space and location in time both embody and perhaps +necessitate a judgment of externality. This suggestion is very vague, +and I must leave it in this crude form.</p> + + +<p class="nindc space-above2"><i>Diverse Euclidean Measure Systems</i></p> + +<p>Turning now to the mathematical investigations on the axioms of +geometry, the outcome, which is most important for us to remember, +is the great separation which it discloses between non-metrical +projective geometry, and metrical geometry. Non-metrical projective +geometry is by far the more fundamental. Starting with the concepts +of points, straight lines, and planes (of which not all three need +be taken as indefinable), and with certain very simple non-metrical +properties of these entities—such as, for instance, that two points +uniquely determine a straight line—nearly the whole of geometry can +be constructed. Even quantitative coordinates can<span class="pagenum" id="Page_198">[Pg 198]</span> be introduced, to +facilitate the reasoning. But no mention of distance, area, or volume, +need have been introduced. Points will have an order on the line, but +order does not imply any settled distance.</p> + +<p>When we now inquire what measurements of distance are possible, we find +that there are different systems of measurement all equally possible. +There are three main types of system: any system of one type gives +Euclidean geometry, any system of another type gives Hyperbolic (or +Lobatchewskian) geometry, any system of the third type gives Elliptic +geometry. Also different beings, or the same being if he chooses, +may reckon in different systems of the same type, or in systems of +different types. Consider the example which will interest us later. +Two beings, A and B, agree to use the same three intersecting lines +as axes of <i>x</i>, <i>y</i>, <i>z</i>. They both employ a system of +measurement of the Euclidean type, and (what is not necessarily the +case) agree as to the plane at infinity. That is, they agree as to the +lines which are parallel. Then with the usual method of rectangular +Cartesian axes, they agree that the coordinates of P are the lengths +ON, NM, MP. So far all is harmony. A fixes on the segment OU<sub>1</sub>, on +O<i>x</i>, as being the unit length, and B on the segment OV<sub>1</sub>, on +O<i>x</i>. A calls his coordinates (<i>x</i>, <i>y</i>, <i>z</i>), and +B calls them (X, Y, Z).</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_199">[Pg 199]</span></p> + +<p>Then it is found [since both systems are Euclidean] that, whatever +point P be taken, +<span class="align-center"><img style="vertical-align: -0.566ex; width: 39.399ex; height: 2.262ex;" src="images/7.svg" alt="Set of coordinate transformation equations in three-dimensional space." data-tex="\[ +\mathrm{X} = \beta x,\,\, \mathrm{Y} = \gamma y,\,\, \mathrm{Z} = \delta z. \quad[\beta \neq \gamma \neq \delta.] +\]"></span> +They proceed to adjust their differences, and first take the +<i>x</i>-coordinates. Obviously they have taken different units of +length along O<i>x</i>. The length OU<sub>1</sub>, which A calls one unit, B +calls <img style="vertical-align: -0.439ex; width: 1.281ex; height: 2.034ex;" src="images/4.svg" alt="Greek letter beta." data-tex="\(\beta\)"> units. B changes his unit length to OU<sub>1</sub>, from its original +length OV<sub>1</sub>, and obtains X = <i>x</i>. But now, as he must use the +same unit for all his measurements, his other coordinates are altered +in the same ratio. Thus we now have +<span class="align-center"><img style="vertical-align: -1.991ex; width: 25.658ex; height: 5.143ex;" src="images/8.svg" alt="Set of coordinate transformation equations that define a non-uniform scaling (anisotropic transformation) in three-dimensional space." data-tex="\[ +\mathrm{X} = x,\,\, \mathrm{Y} = \dfrac{\gamma y}{\beta},\,\, \mathrm{Z} = \dfrac{\delta z}{\beta}. +\]"></span> +The fundamental divergence is now evident. A and B agree as to their +units along O<i>x</i>. They settled that by taking along that axis a +given segment OU<sub>1</sub> as having the unit length. But they cannot agree +as to what segment along O<i>y</i> is equal to OU<sub>1</sub>. A says it is +OU<sub>2</sub>, and B that it is OU<sub>2</sub>′. Similarly for lengths along OZ.</p> + +<p>The result is that A's spheres +<span class="align-center"><img style="vertical-align: -0.464ex; width: 17.603ex; height: 2.464ex;" src="images/9.svg" alt="Representation of a sphere in three-dimensional Cartesian coordinates." data-tex="\[ +x^2 + y^2 + z^2 = r^2, +\]"></span> +are B's ellipsoids, +<span class="align-center"><img style="vertical-align: -5.421ex; width: 31.102ex; height: 11.972ex;" src="images/10.svg" alt="This set of equations represents the transformation of a sphere into an ellipsoid through anisotropic scaling." data-tex="\[ +\begin{array}{l} +&\mathrm{X}^2 + \dfrac{\beta ^2Y^2}{\gamma^2} + +\dfrac{\beta^2\mathrm{Z}^2}{\delta^2} = r^2,\\ +\textit{i.e.}&\dfrac{\mathrm{X}^2}{\beta^2} + \dfrac{Y^2}{\gamma^2} + +\dfrac{\mathrm{Z}^2}{\delta^2} = \dfrac{r^2}{\beta^2}. +\end{array} +\]"></span> +Thus the measurement of angles by the two is hopelessly at variance.</p> + +<p>If <img style="vertical-align: -0.489ex; width: 9.548ex; height: 2.111ex;" src="images/11.svg" alt="This condition means that the three scaling factors are all distinct, each axis is stretched or compressed by a different amount." data-tex="\(\beta \neq \gamma \neq \delta\)">, there is one, and only one, set of<span class="pagenum" id="Page_200">[Pg 200]</span> common rectangular +axes at O, namely that from which they started. If <img style="vertical-align: -0.489ex; width: 5.25ex; height: 2.111ex;" src="images/12.svg" alt="Since gamma is equal to delta, the scaling along the Y and Z axes are the same." data-tex="\(\gamma = \delta\)">, but <img style="vertical-align: -0.489ex; width: 5.526ex; height: 2.109ex;" src="images/13.svg" alt="Since beta is different from gamma, the shape is not a perfect shere, but a sheroid. " data-tex="\(\beta \neq \gamma\)">, +then there are a singly infinite number of common rectangular axes +found by rotating the axes round O<i>x</i>. This is, for us, the +interesting case. The same phenomena are reproduced by transferring to +any parallel axes.</p> + +<p>The root of the difficulty is, that A's measuring rod, which for him is +a rigid invariable body, appears to B as changing in length when turned +in different directions. Similarly all measuring rods, satisfactory +to A, violate B's immediate judgment of invariability, and change +according to the same law. There is no way out of the difficulty. +Two rods <img style="vertical-align: -0.489ex; width: 1.17ex; height: 1.489ex;" src="images/5.svg" alt="Greek letter rho." data-tex="\(\rho\)"> and <img style="vertical-align: -0.025ex; width: 1.292ex; height: 1ex;" src="images/14.svg" alt="Greek letter sigma." data-tex="\(\sigma\)"> coincide whenever laid one on the other; <img style="vertical-align: -0.489ex; width: 1.17ex; height: 1.489ex;" src="images/5.svg" alt="Greek letter rho." data-tex="\(\rho\)"> is held +still, and both men agree that it does not change. But <img style="vertical-align: -0.025ex; width: 1.292ex; height: 1ex;" src="images/14.svg" alt="Greek letter sigma." data-tex="\(\sigma\)"> is turned +round. A says it is invariable, B says it changes. To test the matter, +<img style="vertical-align: -0.489ex; width: 1.17ex; height: 1.489ex;" src="images/5.svg" alt="Greek letter rho." data-tex="\(\rho\)"> is turned round to measure it, and exactly fits it. But while A is +satisfied, B declares that <img style="vertical-align: -0.489ex; width: 1.17ex; height: 1.489ex;" src="images/5.svg" alt="Greek letter rho." data-tex="\(\rho\)"> has changed in exactly the same way as did +<img style="vertical-align: -0.025ex; width: 1.292ex; height: 1ex;" src="images/14.svg" alt="Greek letter sigma." data-tex="\(\sigma\)">. Meanwhile B has procured two material rods satisfactory to him as +invariable, and A makes exactly the same objections.</p> + +<p>We shall say that A and B employ diverse Euclidean metrical systems.</p> + +<p>The most extraordinary fact of human life is that all beings seem to +form their judgments of spatial quantity according to the same metrical +system.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_201">[Pg 201]</span></p> + + +<p class="nindc space-above2"><i>Relativity in Modern Physics</i></p> + +<p>Owing to the fact that points of space are incapable of direct +recognition, there is a difficulty—apart from any abstract question +of the nature of space—in deciding on the motion to be ascribed to +any body. Even if there be such a thing as absolute position, it is +impossible in practice to decide directly whether a body's absolute +position has changed. All spatial measurement is relative to matter.</p> + +<p>Newton's laws of motion in their modern dress evade this difficulty +by asserting that a framework of axes of coordinates can be defined +by their relations to matter such that, assuming these axes to be at +rest, and all velocities to be measured relatively to them, the laws +hold. The same expedient has to be employed for time, namely, the laws +hold when the measurement of the flow of time is made by the proper +reference to periodic events. Thus the laws assert that the framework +and the natural clock adapted for their use have been successfully +found.</p> + +<p>But, if one framework will do, an infinity of others serve equally +well; namely, not only—as is of course the case—all those at rest +relatively to the first framework, but also all those which move +without relative rotation with uniform velocity relatively to the +first. This whole set<span class="pagenum" id="Page_202">[Pg 202]</span> of frameworks is on a level in respect to +Newton's laws. We will call them Dynamical frameworks.</p> + +<p>Now, suppose there are two observers, A and B. They agree in their +non-metrical projective geometry, <i>e.g.</i>, what A calls a straight +line so does B. They also both apply a Euclidean metrical system of +measurement to this space. Their two metrical systems also agree in +having the same plane at infinity, that is, lines which are parallel +for A are also parallel for B. Furthermore, they have both successfully +applied Newton's laws to the movement of matter, and agree in having +the same sets of dynamical axes. But the framework (among these sets) +which A chooses to regard as at rest is different from the frame (among +the same sets) which B so regards.</p> + +<p>Without alteration of their respective judgment of rest, they choose +their co-ordinate axes so that the origins (O for A, and O′ for B) are +in relative motion along OO′, which is the axis of <i>x</i> for both.</p> + +<p>Further, since OO′ is the line of symmetry of their diverse Euclidean +systems, we assume that the two measure-systems agree for planes +perpendicular to OO′, <i>i.e.</i>, we assume a symmetry round OO′. +Then if, for A at O, the distance OO′ be ξ, the relations at any +instant between A's coordinates (<i>x</i>, <i>y</i>, <i>z</i>) and B's +coordinates<span class="pagenum" id="Page_203">[Pg 203]</span> (<i>x′</i>, <i>y′</i>, <i>z′</i>) for the same point P are +given by +<span class="align-center"><img style="vertical-align: -0.566ex; width: 31.807ex; height: 2.396ex;" src="images/15.svg" alt="System of equations which describes a coordinate transformation from one coordinate system to another. " data-tex="\[ +x' = \beta(x - \xi),\quad y' = y,\quad z' = z. +\]"></span> +</p> + +<p>Also, according to A's clock, O′ is moving forward with a uniform +velocity <i>v</i>, and we measure A's time from the instant of the +coincidence of O and O′.</p> + +<p>Thus +<span class="align-center"><img style="vertical-align: -0.464ex; width: 6.551ex; height: 2.057ex;" src="images/16.svg" alt="Description of a moving coordinate system." data-tex="\[ +\xi = vt, +\]"></span> +and +<span class="align-center"><img style="vertical-align: -0.566ex; width: 32.73ex; height: 2.396ex;" src="images/17.svg" alt="This transformation is a coordinate change to a scaled, moving frame." data-tex="\[ +x' = \beta(x - vt),\quad y' = y,\quad z' = z. +\]"></span> +</p> + +<p>We now consider B's clock, and ask for the most general supposition +which is consistent with the fact that their judgments as to the fact +of uniform motion are in agreement.</p> + +<p>We do not assume that events in various parts of space which A +considers to be simultaneous are so considered by B. But we assume that +at any point P, with coordinates (<i>x</i>, <i>y</i>, <i>z</i>) for +A, there is a determinate relation between B's time T and <i>x</i>, +<i>y</i>, <i>z</i>, <i>t</i>.</p> + +<p>Put +<span class="align-center"><img style="vertical-align: -0.566ex; width: 15.574ex; height: 2.262ex;" src="images/18.svg" alt="Introduction a scalar field F as a function of space and time." data-tex="\[ +\mathrm{T} = f(x,y,z,t). +\]"></span> +</p> +<p> +Write +<span class="align-center"><img style="vertical-align: -2.016ex; width: 43.261ex; height: 5.167ex;" src="images/19.svg" alt="Definition of the partial derivates of the scalar field T with respect to the space and time variables." data-tex="\[ +\mathrm{P} = \dfrac{\delta \mathrm{T}}{\delta x},\quad \mathrm{Q} += \dfrac{\delta \mathrm{T}}{\delta y},\quad \mathrm{R} += \dfrac{\delta \mathrm{T}}{\delta z},\quad \mathrm{S} += \dfrac{\delta \mathrm{T}}{\delta t}. +\]"></span> +</p> + +<p>Now suppose that the point P is moving, and that (<i>u</i><sub>1</sub>, +<i>u</i><sub>2</sub>, <i>u</i><sub>3</sub>) is its set of component velocities along +the axes according to A's "space and clock" system, and (U<sub>1</sub>, U<sub>2</sub>, +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_204">[Pg 204]</span>U<sub>3</sub>) is its set of component velocities according to B's "space and +clock" system. Then by mere differentiation it follows after a short +mathematical deduction that +<span class="align-center"><img style="vertical-align: -5.748ex; width: 23.179ex; height: 12.628ex;" src="images/20.svg" alt="Description of how a velocity u transformed into a normalized velocity U in the space defined by T." data-tex="\[ +\begin{array}{l} +\mathrm{U}_1= \frac{\left\{\frac{d\beta}{dt}(x - vt) + \beta(u_1- v)\right\}} +{\left\{\mathrm{P}u_1 + \mathrm{Q}u_2 + \mathrm{R}u_3 + \mathrm{S}\right\}},\\ +\mathrm{U}_2 = \frac{u_2}{\{\mathrm{P}u_1+ \mathrm{Q}u_2 + \mathrm{R}u_3 + \mathrm{S}\}},\\ +\mathrm{U}_3 = \frac{u_3}{\{\mathrm{P}u_1 + \mathrm{Q}u_2 + \mathrm{R}u_3 + \mathrm{S}\}}. +\end{array} +\]"></span> +</p> + +<p>But we have assumed that, whatever the direction of the resultant +velocity (<i>u</i><sub>1</sub>, <i>u</i><sub>2</sub>, <i>u</i><sub>3</sub>), the velocities +(U<sub>1</sub>, U<sub>2</sub>, U<sub>3</sub>) and (<i>u</i><sub>1</sub>, <i>u</i><sub>2</sub>, <i>u</i><sub>3</sub>) +are both uniform when either is uniform.</p> + +<p>Hence it is easily proved that <img style="vertical-align: -0.439ex; width: 1.281ex; height: 2.034ex;" src="images/4.svg" alt="Greek letter beta." data-tex="\(\beta\)">, P, Q, R, S are independent of the +coordinates (<i>x</i>, <i>y</i>, <i>z</i>) and of the time <i>t</i>. In +other words, they are constant.</p> + +<p>Hence we obtain +<span class="align-center"><img style="vertical-align: -3.756ex; width: 32.589ex; height: 8.643ex;" src="images/21.svg" alt="Definition of the transformed velocity-like quantities in terms of the original velocity components." data-tex="\[ +\begin{array}{l} +\mathrm{U}_1= &\dfrac{\beta(u_1 - v)}{\{\mathrm{P}u_1 + \mathrm{Q}u_2 + \mathrm{R}u_3 + \mathrm{S}\}},\\ +\text{and} &\mathrm{T} = \mathrm{P}x + \mathrm{Q}y + \mathrm{R}z + \mathrm{S}t. +\end{array} +\]"></span> +</p> + +<p>But we assumed that OO′, <i>i.e.</i>, O<i>x</i>, is an axis of +symmetry. It follows from this assumption that +<span class="align-center"><img style="vertical-align: -0.437ex; width: 11.22ex; height: 2.032ex;" src="images/22.svg" alt="Variable Q are R are equal to zero." data-tex="\[ +\mathrm{Q} = \mathrm{R} = 0. +\]"></span> +</p> + +<p>We thus obtain the simplified results +<span class="align-center"><img style="vertical-align: -8.941ex; width: 27.259ex; height: 19.014ex;" src="images/23.svg" alt="Definition of a particular form of the scalar field T(x,t) and corresponding transformed velocity components." data-tex="\[ +\left. +\begin{array}{l} +\mathrm{T} &= \mathrm{P}x + \mathrm{S}t,\\ +\mathrm{U}_1 &= \dfrac{\beta(u_1 - v)}{\mathrm{P}u_1 + \mathrm{S}},\\ +\mathrm{U}_2 &= \dfrac{u_2}{\mathrm{P}u_1 + \mathrm{S}},\\ +\mathrm{U}_3 &= \dfrac{u_3}{\mathrm{P}u_1 + \mathrm{S}}. +\end{array} +\right\} +\qquad\text{(I)} +\]"></span> +</p> + +<p>Here we remember that (<i>u</i><sub>1</sub>, <i>u</i><sub>2</sub>, <i>u</i><sub>3</sub>) are +the velocities of any particle according to A's "space and clock" +system, and that (U<sub>1</sub>, U<sub>2</sub>, U<sub>3</sub>) are the velocities of the same +point according to B's<span class="pagenum" id="Page_205">[Pg 205]</span> "space and clock" system. We have obtained the +most general relations consistent with the facts that (1) they both +employ Euclidean systems, related as described above, and (2) they +agree in their judgments on the uniformity of velocity.</p> + +<p>We now compare their judgments on the magnitudes of velocities.</p> + +<p>Let the magnitude of the velocity of P be V according to A's judgment, +and V′ according to B's’ judgment.</p> + +<p>Then +<span class="align-center"><img style="vertical-align: -2.339ex; width: 25.14ex; height: 5.81ex;" src="images/24.svg" alt="Transformed kinetic energy normalized by how the scalar field changes along the path." data-tex="\[ +\begin{array}{l} +\mathrm{V}^2 &= u_1{^2} + u_2{^2} + u_3{^2},\\ +\mathrm{V}'{^2} &= \mathrm{U}_1{^2} + \mathrm{U}_2{^2} + \mathrm{U}_3{^2}. +\end{array} +\]"></span> +</p> + +<p>Also we can put +<span class="align-center"><img style="vertical-align: -0.439ex; width: 32.171ex; height: 2.009ex;" src="images/25.svg" alt="Components of the vector u in terms of the magnitude V and direction cosines." data-tex="\[ +u_1 = l\mathrm{V},\quad u_2 = m\mathrm{V},\quad u_3 = n\mathrm{V}, +\]"></span> +</p> + +<p class="nind"> +where (<i>l</i>, <i>m</i>, <i>n</i>) have nothing to do with the +magnitude V, but simply depend on the direction of motion. In fact +(<i>l</i>, <i>m</i>, <i>n</i>) are the "direction cosines" of the +velocity according to A's judgment. By substituting in the above +equation for V<sup>2</sup> we see that +<span class="align-center"><img style="vertical-align: -0.186ex; width: 17.29ex; height: 2.185ex;" src="images/26.svg" alt="Defining condition for l, m, n to be direction cosines." data-tex="\[ +l^2 + m^2 + n^2 = 1. +\]"></span> +</p> + +<p>Now, substituting for (<i>u</i><sub>1</sub>, <i>u</i><sub>2</sub>, <i>u</i><sub>3</sub>) in +the equations (I) above, and squaring and adding, and eliminating +<i>m</i><sup>2</sup> + <i>n</i><sup>2</sup> by the relation just found, we at once find +<span class="align-center"><img style="vertical-align: -2.194ex; width: 42.428ex; height: 5.687ex;" src="images/27.svg" alt="Transformed velocity magnitude squared in full and simplified form." data-tex="\[ +\mathrm{V}'{^2} = \frac{(\beta^2 - 1)\mathrm{V}^2l^2 - 2\beta^2 \mathrm{V}vl + \beta^2v^2 + \mathrm{V}^2} +{(\mathrm{PV}l + \mathrm{S})^2}. +\]"></span> +</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_206">[Pg 206]</span></p> + +<p>It is thus seen that in general the relation of V' to V depends on the +direction cosine <i>l</i>. Now <i>l</i> is the cosine of the angle +which the direction of the velocity V makes with O<i>x</i>, according +to A's judgment.</p> + +<p>The meaning of this relation is, that if A discharges, from guns at +the point P, shells with a given muzzle velocity V according to his +judgment, B will consider that their muzzle velocities are different +from each other, except in the case of pairs of guns equally inclined +to the axis OO′. Instances of this type of diversity of judgment can +be noted any day by any one who looks out of the window of a railway +carriage, and forgets that he is travelling.</p> + +<p>Now, suppose the velocity V′ bears a relation to the velocity V, which +is independent of <i>l</i>. Then <i>l</i> must disappear from the above +formula. There are two conditions to be satisfied</p> + +<p>One condition is +<span class="align-center"><img style="vertical-align: -2.194ex; width: 15.251ex; height: 5.611ex;" src="images/28.svg" alt="Definition of the scalar field gradient P and time coefficient S so that the transformed velocity magnitude becomes a constant." data-tex="\[ +\mathrm{V}^2 = \frac{\beta^2v^2}{(\beta^2 - 1)}, +\]"></span> +</p> + +<p class="nind">or in a more convenient form +<span class="align-center"><img style="vertical-align: -3.98ex; width: 16.402ex; height: 7.016ex;" src="images/29.svg" alt="Physical speed V is determined by the scaling factor beta and the frame velocity v." data-tex="\[ +\beta^2 = \frac{1}{\left(1 - \tfrac{v^2}{\mathrm{V}^2}\right)}. +\]"></span> +</p> + +<p>The meaning of this condition is, that there is one, and only one, +muzzle velocity V (according to A's judgment), namely, the muzzle +velocity given by the above formula, which can have the property that +B will judge that all the guns are<span class="pagenum" id="Page_207">[Pg 207]</span> firing in their diverse directions +with one common muzzle velocity.</p> + +<p>Let us now suppose that V has this peculiar value: that is, if we look +on this value V as known, we must suppose that <img style="vertical-align: -0.439ex; width: 1.281ex; height: 2.034ex;" src="images/4.svg" alt="Greek letter beta." data-tex="\(\beta\)"> is given by the second +of the above formulæ.</p> + +<p>The other condition allows P and S to be put in the forms +<span class="align-center"><img style="vertical-align: -3.43ex; width: 29.854ex; height: 7.991ex;" src="images/30.svg" alt="Lorentz-type transformations." data-tex="\[ +\begin{array}{l} +&\mathrm{P} = -\dfrac{\beta v}{\lambda \mathrm{V}^2},\quad \mathrm{S} = \dfrac{\beta}{\lambda},\\ +\text{where}&\qquad\qquad\mathrm{V}' = \lambda. +\end{array} +\]"></span> +</p> + +<p>Thus we have the bundle of formulæ +<span class="align-center"><img style="vertical-align: -8.221ex; width: 20.621ex; height: 17.573ex;" src="images/31.svg" alt="Lorentz-type transformations." data-tex="\[ +\begin{array}{l} +\beta^2 &= \frac{1}{\left(1 - \tfrac{v^2}{\mathrm{V}^2}\right)},\\ +\mathrm{T} &= \dfrac{\beta\left\{\dfrac{t - vx}{\mathrm{V}^2}\right\}}{\lambda},\\ +\mathrm{V}' &= \lambda \mathrm{V}. +\end{array} +\]"></span> +</p> + +<p>The value which we give to <img style="vertical-align: -0.027ex; width: 1.319ex; height: 1.597ex;" src="images/32.svg" alt="Greek letter lambda." data-tex="\(\lambda\)"> is purely a matter for the adjustment of +units. If we want A and B to agree in their judgments of the magnitude +of this peculiar muzzle-velocity, we put <img style="vertical-align: -0.186ex; width: 5.467ex; height: 1.756ex;" src="images/33.svg" alt="Greek letter lambda is equal to one." data-tex="\(\lambda = 1\)">.</p> + +<p>We then get the formulæ usually adopted, namely +<span class="align-center"><img style="vertical-align: -8.221ex; width: 30.551ex; height: 17.573ex;" src="images/34.svg" alt="Relativistic-style transformation." data-tex="\[ +\left. +\begin{array}{l} +\beta^2 &= \frac{1}{\left(1 - \tfrac{v^2}{\mathrm{V}^2}\right)},\\ +\mathrm{T} &= \dfrac{\beta\left\{\dfrac{t - vx}{\mathrm{V}^2}\right\}}{\lambda},\\ +\mathrm{V}' &= \lambda \mathrm{V}. +\end{array} +\right\} +\qquad\text{(II)}\\ +\]"></span> +</p> + +<p>But if we prefer that A and B should reckon (according to A's judgment) +in the same units of time, we put <img style="vertical-align: -0.439ex; width: 5.617ex; height: 2.034ex;" src="images/35.svg" alt="Greek letter malbda is equal to greek letter lambda." data-tex="\(\lambda = \beta\)">, and obtain +<span class="align-center"><img style="vertical-align: -6.509ex; width: 15.893ex; height: 14.15ex;" src="images/36.svg" alt="Relativistic transformation." data-tex="\[\begin{array}{l} +\beta^2 &= \frac{1}{\left(1 - \tfrac{v^2}{\mathrm{V}^2}\right)},\\ +\mathrm{T} &= \dfrac{t - vx}{\mathrm{V}^2},\\ +\mathrm{V}' &= \beta \mathrm{V}. +\end{array} +\]"></span> +</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_208">[Pg 208]</span></p> + +<p>But A and B are in any case in such hopeless difficulties over their +comparisons of time-judgments that the detail of using the same units +does not help them much. Accordingly the formulæ marked (II) are those +used. Thus A and B agree in their judgments as to the magnitude of one +special velocity V, whatever may be the direction in which the entity +possessing it is moving.</p> + +<p>In order to reach this measure of agreement, they have to disagree as +to their space judgments and their time judgments. The root cause of +their disagreement is their diverse judgment as to which axis system is +to be taken at rest for the purpose of measuring velocities.</p> + +<p>Before discussing the nature of the disagreement disclosed in formula +(II), let us ask why we should bring these difficulties on our heads by +supposing that two people in relative motion, who both (for the purpose +of measuring velocities) assume that they are at rest, should agree in +their judgments in respect to this special velocity V.</p> + +<p>Such an agreement has no counterpart in any of our obvious judgments +made from railway carriages. Surely we can wait till the contingency +occurs before discussing the confusion which it creates.</p> + +<p>But the contingency has occurred. It occurs<span class="pagenum" id="Page_209">[Pg 209]</span> when we consider the +velocity of light. Perhaps I may venture to remind a philosophical +society that light moves so very quickly that it is difficult to +consider its velocity at all. So we need not be surprised that this +peculiar fact concerning its velocity is not more obvious.</p> + +<p>Now V being the velocity of light, unless <i>v</i> is large, <i>v</i>/V +(and still more <i>v</i><sup>2</sup>/V<sup>2</sup>) will be quite inappreciable. The only +velocity ready to hand which is big enough to give <i>v</i>/V an +appreciable value is the velocity of the earth in its orbit.</p> + +<p>Many diverse experiments have been made, and they all agree in +concluding that a man who assumes the earth to be at rest will find by +measurement that the velocity of light is the same in all directions. +Furthermore, when the same man turns his attention to interstellar or +interplanetary phenomena, and assumes the sun to be at rest, he will +again find the velocity of light to be the same in all directions. +These are well-attested experiments made at long intervals of time.</p> + +<p>This is the exact contingency contemplated above.</p> + +<p>Again the velocity of light <i>in vacuo</i> has recently taken on a +new dignity. It used to be one among other wave velocities such as +the velocity of sound in air, or in water, or the velocity of surface +waves in water. But Clerk Maxwell<span class="pagenum" id="Page_210">[Pg 210]</span> discovered that all electromagnetic +influences are propagated with the velocity of light, and now modern +physical science half suspects that electromagnetic influences are +the only physical influences which relate the changes in the physical +world. Accordingly the velocity of light becomes the fundamental +natural velocity, and experiment shows that our judgment of its +magnitude is not affected by our choice of the framework at rest, so +long as we keep to a set of dynamical axes. These experiments on light +have been confirmed by other electromagnetic experiments not involving +light.</p> + +<p>Thus we are driven to equations (II), where V is the velocity of light.</p> + +<p>The first conclusion to be drawn from equations (II) is that two people +who make different choices of bodies at rest will disagree as to +their measuring rods in the way described above. There is no peculiar +difficulty about that. The only wonder is that all people agree so well +in their judgments as to metrical systems. A mathematical angel would +naturally expect incarnate men to be in violent disagreement on this +subject.</p> + +<p>But the case of time is different. For simplicity of statement we speak +of A as at O, and B as at O′. We remember that O′ is moving relatively +to O with velocity <i>v</i> in direction OO′. Suppose A and B are +looking in this direction; and they both measure their time from the +instant<span class="pagenum" id="Page_211">[Pg 211]</span> when they met, as O′ passed over O. Then we have +<span class="align-center"><img style="vertical-align: -5.474ex; width: 16.646ex; height: 11.942ex;" src="images/37.svg" alt="Lorentz transformation." data-tex="\[ +\mathrm{T} = \frac{\left\{\dfrac{t - vx}{\mathrm{V}^2}\right\}}{\left\{\dfrac{1 - v^2}{\mathrm{V}^2}\right\}}. +\]"></span> +</p> + +<p>Now, suppose we consider all the events all over space which A +considers to have happened simultaneously at the time <i>t</i>. The +events of this set which occurred anywhere on a plane perpendicular to +OO′ at a distance <i>x</i> in front of O (according to A's reckoning), +will have occurred according to B's reckoning at the time T as given +above. Let us fix our attention on the fact that B does not consider +all these events to be simultaneous. For let T<sub>1</sub>, and T<sub>2</sub> be B's +times for such events on planes <i>x</i><sub>1</sub>, and <i>x</i><sub>2</sub>. Then +<span class="align-center"><img style="vertical-align: -2.194ex; width: 22.836ex; height: 5.498ex;" src="images/38.svg" alt="Lorentz time-like coordinate." data-tex="\[ +\mathrm{T}_1 - \mathrm{T}_2 = \frac{v(x_2 - x_1)}{(\mathrm{V}^2 - v^2)}. +\]"></span> +</p> + +<p>Thus if <i>x</i><sub>2</sub> be greater than <i>x</i><sub>1</sub>, T<sub>2</sub> is less than +T<sub>1</sub>. Thus B judges the more distant events in front of him to have +happened earlier than the nearer events in front of him, and <i>vice +versa</i> for the events behind. This disturbance of the judgment of +simultaneity is the fundamental fact. Obviously the measurement of time +intervals is a detail compared to simultaneity. A may think a sermon +long, and B may think it short, but at least they should both agree +that it stopped when the clock hand pointed at the hour. The worst of +the matter is that so far as any test can be applied there is no method +of discriminating between the validities of their judgments.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_212">[Pg 212]</span></p> + +<p>Thus we are confronted with two distinct concepts of the common world, +A's space-time concept, and B's space-time concept. Who is right? It is +no use staying for an answer. We must follow the example of the wise +old Roman, and pass on to other things.</p> + +<p>Thus estimates of quantity in space and time, and, to some extent, even +estimates of order, depend on the individual observer. But what are +the crude deliverances of sensible experience, apart from that world +of imaginative reconstruction which for each of us has the best claim +to be called our real world? Here the experimental psychologist steps +in. We cannot get away from him. I wish we could, for he is frightfully +difficult to understand. Also, sometimes his knowledge of the +principles of mathematics is rather weak, and I sometimes suspect—— +No, I will not say what I sometimes think: probably he, with equal +reason, is thinking the same sort of thing of us.</p> + +<p>I will, however, venture to summarise conclusions, which are, I +believe, in harmony with the experimental evidence, both physical and +psychological, and which are certainly suggested by the materials for +that unwritten chapter in mathematical logic which I have already +commended to your notice. The concepts of space and time and of +quantity are capable of analysis into bundles of simpler concepts. In +any given<span class="pagenum" id="Page_213">[Pg 213]</span> sensible experience it is not necessary, or even usual, that +the whole complete bundle of such concepts apply. For example, the +concept of externality may apply without that of linear order, and the +concept of linear order may apply without that of linear distance.</p> + +<p>Again, the abstract mathematical concept of a space-relation +may confuse together distinct concepts which apply to the given +perceptions. For example, linear order in the sense of a linear +projection from the observer is distinct from linear order in the sense +of a row of objects stretching across the line of sight.</p> + +<p>Mathematical physics assumes a given world of definitely related +objects, and the various space-time systems are alternative ways of +expressing those relations as concepts in a form which also applies to +the immediate experience of observers.</p> + +<p>Yet there must be one way of expressing the relations between objects +in a common external world. Alternative methods can only arise as the +result of alternative standpoints; that is to say, as the result of +leaving something added by the observer sticking (as it were) in the +universe.</p> + +<p>But this way of conceiving the world of physical science, as composed +of hypothetical objects, leaves it as a mere fairy tale. What is really +actual are the immediate experiences. The task of deductive science +is to consider the concepts<span class="pagenum" id="Page_214">[Pg 214]</span> which apply to these data of experience, +and then to consider the concepts relating to these concepts, and +so on to any necessary degree of refinement. As our concepts become +more abstract, their logical relations become more general, and less +liable to exception. By this logical construction we finally arrive +at conceptions, (i) which have determinate exemplifications in the +experience of the individuals, and (ii) whose logical relations have +a peculiar smoothness. For example, conceptions of mathematical time, +of mathematical space, are such smooth conceptions. No one lives in +"an infinite given whole," but in a set of fragmentary experiences. +The problem is to exhibit the concepts of mathematical space and time +as the necessary outcome of these fragments by a process of logical +building up. Similarly for the other physical concepts. This process +builds a common world of conceptions out of fragmentary worlds of +experience. The material pyramids of Egypt are a conception, what is +actual are the fragmentary experiences of the races who have gazed on +them.</p> + +<p>So far as science seeks to rid itself of hypothesis, it cannot go +beyond these general logical constructions. For science, as thus +conceived, the divergent time orders considered above present no +difficulty. The different time systems simply register the different +relations of the mathematical construct to those individual +experiences<span class="pagenum" id="Page_215">[Pg 215]</span> (actual or hypothetical) which could exist as the crude +material from which the construct is elaborated.</p> + +<p>But after all it should be possible so to elaborate the mathematical +construct so as to eliminate specific reference to particular +experiences. Whatever be the data of experience, there must be +something which can be said of them as a whole, and that something is +a statement of the general properties of the common world. It is hard +to believe that with proper generalisation time and space will not be +found among such properties.</p> + + +<p class="nindc space-above2"><i>Commentary added on reading the Paper before the Aristotelian +Society</i></p> + +<p>The first six pages of the paper consist of a summary of ideas which +ought to be in our minds while considering problems of time and space. +The ideas are mostly philosophical, and the summary has been made by +an amateur in that science; so there is no reason to ascribe to it any +importance except that of a modest reminder. There are only two points +in this summary to which I would draw attention.</p> + +<p>On <a href="#Page_192">pp. 192</a> and <a href="#Page_193">193</a> there occurs—</p> + +<p>"Wherever mankind ... unending uniform succession."</p> + +<p>If I understand Kant rightly—which I admit<span class="pagenum" id="Page_216">[Pg 216]</span> to be very +problematical—he holds that in the act of experience we are aware +of space and time as ingredients necessary for the occurrence of +experience. I would suggest—rather timidly—that this doctrine should +be given a different twist, which in fact turns it in the opposite +direction—namely, that in the act of experience we perceive a whole +formed of related differentiated parts. The relations between these +parts possess certain characteristics, and time and space are the +expressions of some of the characteristics of these relations. Then the +generality and uniformity which are ascribed to time and space express +what may be termed the uniformity of the texture of experience.</p> + +<p>The success of mankind—modest though it is—in deducing uniform laws +of nature is, so far as it goes, a testimony that this uniformity of +texture goes beyond those characteristics of the data of experience +which are expressed as time and space. Time and space are necessary +to experience in the sense that they are characteristics of our +experience; and, of course, no one can have our experience without +running into them. I cannot see that Kant's deduction amounts to much +more than saying that "what is, is"—true enough, but not very helpful.</p> + +<p>But I admit that what I have termed the "uniformity of the texture of +experience" is a most curious and arresting fact. I am quite<span class="pagenum" id="Page_217">[Pg 217]</span> ready to +believe that it is a mere illusion; and later on in the paper I suggest +that this uniformity does not belong to the immediate relations of the +crude data of experience, but is the result of substituting for them +more refined logical entities, such as relations between relations, or +classes of relations, or classes of classes of relations. By this means +it can be demonstrated—I think—that the uniformity which must be +ascribed to experience is of a much more abstract attenuated character +than is usually allowed. This process of lifting the uniform time and +space of the physical world into the status of logical abstractions has +also the advantage of recognising another fact, namely, the extremely +fragmentary nature of all direct individual experience.</p> + +<p>My point in this respect is that fragmentary individual experiences +are all that we know, and that all speculation must start from these +<i>disjecta membra</i> as its sole datum. It is not true that we are +directly aware of a smooth running world, which in our speculations we +are to conceive as given. In my view the creation of the world is the +first unconscious act of speculative thought; and the first task of a +self-conscious philosophy is to explain how it has been done.</p> + +<p>There are roughly two rival explanations. One is to assert the world +as a postulate. The<span class="pagenum" id="Page_218">[Pg 218]</span> other way is to obtain it as a deduction, not a +deduction through a chain of reasoning, but a deduction through a chain +of definitions which, in fact, lifts thought on to a more abstract +level in which the logical ideas are more complex, and their relations +are more universal. In this way the broken limited experiences sustain +that connected infinite world in which in our thoughts we live. There +are three more remarks while on this point I wish to make—</p> + +<p>(i) The fact that immediate experience is capable of this deductive +superstructive must mean that it itself has a certain uniformity of +texture. So this great fact still remains.</p> + +<p>(ii) I do not wish to deny the world as a postulate. Speaking without +prejudice, I do not see how in our present elementary state of +philosophical advance we can get on without middle axioms, which, in +fact, we habitually assume.</p> + +<p>My position is, that by careful scrutiny we should extrude such +postulates from every part of our organised knowledge in which it is +possible to do without them.</p> + +<p>Now, physical science organises our knowledge of the relations between +the deliverances of our various senses. I hold that in this department +of knowledge such postulates, though not entirely to be extruded, can +be reduced to a minimum in the way which I have described.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_219">[Pg 219]</span></p> + +<p>I have not the slightest knowledge of theories respecting our emotions, +affections, and moral sentiments, and I can well believe that in +dealing with them further postulates are required. And in practice I +recognise that we all make such postulates, uncritically.</p> + +<p>(iii) The next paragraphs on <a href="#Page_193">pp. 193</a> and <a href="#Page_194">194</a> are as follows—</p> + +<p>"The opposed philosophical method ... physical science."</p> + +<p>It will be noted that, in the light of what has just been stated, the +first of these paragraphs (which, I hope, faithfully expresses the +experimental way of approaching the problem) really obscures the point +which I have been endeavouring to make. The phrase, "If we form the +exact concepts of points, etc.," is fatally ambiguous as between the +method of postulating entities with assigned relations, and the method +of forming logical constructions, and thus reaching points, etc., as +the result of a chain of definitions.</p> + +<p>Turning now to <a href="#Page_194">pp. 194</a>-<a href="#Page_195">195</a>, we come to the following paragraphs—</p> + +<p>"The other theory ... eighteenth century."</p> + +<p>We note again that the relational theory of space from another point +of view brings us back to the idea of the fundamental space-entities +as being logical constructs from the relations between things. The +difference is, that this paragraph is written from a more developed<span class="pagenum" id="Page_220">[Pg 220]</span> +point of view, as it implicitly assumes the things in space, and +conceives space as an expression of certain of their relations. +Combining this paragraph with what has gone before, we see that the +suggested procedure is first to define "things" in terms of the data of +experience, and then to define space in terms of the relations between +things.</p> + +<p>This procedure is explicitly assumed in the next short paragraph: "In +this connection ... from the events."</p> + +<p>The gist of the remaining paragraphs of this section is contained in +the paragraph at the bottom of <a href="#Page_196">p. 196</a>: "The point in time ... new +importance."</p> + +<p>The sentence, "We live in durations, and not in points," can be +amplified by the addition, "We live in space-extensions and not in +space-points."</p> + +<p>It must be noted that "whole and part" as applied to extensions in +space or time must be different from the "all and some" of logic, +unless we admit points to be the fundamental entities. For "spatial +whole and spatial part" can only mean "all and some" if they really +mean "all the points and some of the points." But if extensions and +their relations are more fundamental than points, this interpretation +is precluded. I suggest that "spatial whole and spatial part" is +intimately connected with the<span class="pagenum" id="Page_221">[Pg 221]</span> fundamental relation between things from +which our space ideas spring.</p> + +<p>The relation of space whole to space part has many formal properties +which are identical with the properties of "all and some." Also when +points have been defined, we can replace it by the conception of "all +the points and some of the points." But the confusion between the two +relations is fatal to sound views on the subject.</p> + + +<p class="nindc space-above2"><i>Diverse Euclidean Measure Systems</i></p> + +<p>The next section deals with the measure systems applicable to space.</p> + +<p>A measure system is a group of congruent transformations of space +into itself. Consider a rigid body occupying all space. Let this body +be moved in any way so that the particles of the body which occupied +points P<sub>1</sub>, P<sub>2</sub>, P<sub>3</sub>, etc., now occupy points Q<sub>1</sub>, Q<sub>2</sub>, +Q<sub>3</sub>, etc. Then any point P<sub>1</sub> in space is uniquely related to the +corresponding point Q<sub>1</sub> in space by a one-to-one transformation with +certain characteristics. By the aid of these transformations we can +achieve the definition of distance in a way which definitely determines +the distance between any two points, provided that we can define what +we mean by a congruent transformation without introducing the idea of +distance. If we introduced the idea of distance, we should simply say +that a<span class="pagenum" id="Page_222">[Pg 222]</span> congruent transformation is one which leaves all distances +unchanged, <i>i. e.</i>, if P<sub>1</sub>, P<sub>2</sub> are transformed into Q<sub>1</sub>, +Q<sub>2</sub> then the distance P<sub>1</sub>P<sub>2</sub> is equal to the distance Q<sub>1</sub>Q<sub>2</sub>.</p> + +<p>But mathematicians have succeeded in defining congruent transformations +without any reference to distance.</p> + +<p>There are alternative groups of such congruent transformations, and +each group gives a different measure system for space. The distance +P<sub>1</sub>P<sub>2</sub> may equal the distance Q<sub>1</sub>Q<sub>2</sub> for one measure system, +and will not equal it for another measure system. All these different +measure systems are on the same level, equally applicable. A being +with a strong enough head could think of them all at once as applying +to space. The result so far as it interests us in respect to the +theory of relativity is explained on pp. 197-200, ending with "The +most extraordinary fact ... same metrical system." This final sentence +bears on Poincaré's assertion that the measure system adopted is +purely "conventional." I presume that by "conventional" a certain +arbitrariness of choice is meant; and in that case, I must express +entire dissent. It is true that within the circle of geometrical ideas +there is no means of giving any preference to any one measure system, +and any one is as good as any other. But it is not true that if we +look at a normal carriage wheel, and at an oval curve one foot broad +and ten feet<span class="pagenum" id="Page_223">[Pg 223]</span> long, we experience any arbitrariness of judgment in +deciding which has approximately the form of a circle. Accordingly to +Poincaré the choice between them, as representing a circle, is entirely +conventional.</p> + +<p>Again, we equally form immediate judgments as to whether a body is +approximately rigid. We know that a paving stone is rigid, and that a +concertina is not rigid. This again necessitates a determinate measure +system, selected from among the others.</p> + +<p>Accordingly we conclude that (i) each being does, in fact, employ a +determinate measure system, which remains the same, except possibly +for very small variations, and (ii) the measure systems of different +human beings agree, to within the limits of our observations. These +conclusions are not the less extraordinary because no plain man has +ever doubted them.</p> + +<p>It is an interesting subject to investigate exactly what are the +fundamental uniformities of experience which necessitate this +conclusion. It is not so easy as it looks, since we have to divest +ourselves of all aid of scientific hypothesis if our conclusions are to +be demonstrative.</p> + + +<p class="nindc space-above2"><i>Relativity in Modern Physics</i></p> + +<p><a href="#Page_201">Pp. 201</a>-<a href="#Page_202">202</a>, "Owing to the fact ... which B so regards."</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_224">[Pg 224]</span></p> + +<p>The fundamental formulæ for the theory of relativity are the relations +between diverse co-ordinate systems given on <a href="#Page_203">p. 203</a>, and formulæ II +at the bottom of <a href="#Page_207">p. 207</a>. The general explanation of one method in +which these formulæ arise—namely, Einstein's method—is given on +<a href="#Page_201">pp. 201</a>-<a href="#Page_211">211</a>. Namely, we seek the condition that for all dynamical +axes the velocity of light should be the same, and the same in all +directions. It should be noted that the experiments which, so far as +they go, confirm these formulæ, can also be explained in another way +which makes the theory of relativity unnecessary. We need only ascribe +to the ether a certain property of contraction in the direction of +motion, and the thing is done. So no one need be bludgeoned into +accepting the rather bizarre doctrine of relativity, nor indeed any +other scientific generalisation. The good old homely ether, which we +all know, can in this case serve the purpose. Just as an author of +genius, if he lives long enough, survives the inevitable accusation +of immorality, so the ether by dint of persistence has outlived all +reputation of extravagance. But if we detach ourselves from the glib +phraseology concerning it, the scientific ether is uncommonly like the +primitive explanation of the soul, as a little man inside us, which can +sometimes be caught escaping in the form of a butterfly. As soon as the +ether has to be patched up with special properties to<span class="pagenum" id="Page_225">[Pg 225]</span> explain special +experiments, its scientific use is problematical, and its philosophic +use is <i>nil</i>.</p> + +<p>Philosophically the ether seems to me to be an ambitious attempt +to give a complete explanation of the physical universe by making +an elephant stand on a tortoise. Scientifically it has a perfectly +adequate use by veiling the extremely abstract character of scientific +generalisations under a myth, which enables our imaginations to work +more freely. I am not advocating the extrusion of ether from our +scientific phraseology, even though at special points we have to +abandon it.</p> + +<p>But the key to the reasons why it is worth while to consider seriously +the doctrine of relativity is to be found on <a href="#Page_209">pp. 209</a>,<a href="#Page_210">210</a>: "Again the +velocity of light ... not involving light." Namely, we have begun to +suspect that all physical influences require time for their propagation +in space. This generalisation is a long way from being proved. +Gravitation stands like a lion in the path. But if it be the case, then +all idea of an immediate presentation to us of an aspect of the world +as it in fact is, must necessarily be abandoned. What we perceive at +any instant is already ancient history, with the dates of the various +parts hopelessly mixed.</p> + +<p>We must add to this the difficulty of determining what is at rest +and what is in motion, and the further difficulty of determining a +definite<span class="pagenum" id="Page_226">[Pg 226]</span> uniform flow of time. It is no use discussing this matter +as though, but for the silly extravagant doctrine of relativity, +everything would be plain sailing. It isn't. You may be quite sure +that when, after prolonged study, you endeavour to give the simplest +explanation of a grave difficulty, you will be accused of extravagance. +I have no responsibility for the doctrine of relativity, and hold no +brief for it, but it has some claim to be considered as a comparatively +simple way out of a scientific maze.</p> + +<p>In the first place, we use the Newtonian dynamical sets of axes, +and the Newtonian clock to extricate ourselves partially from the +difficulties of rest, motion, and time. These have proved capable +of scientific determination within the limits of our experimental +accuracy. Thus the only thing left over is the choice of the axes +at rest, which is a completely indeterminate problem on Newtonian +principles.</p> + +<p>Again, so far as we can at present guess by adopting the theory +that all metrical influence is electromagnetic, all influences +are propagated with the velocity of light <i>in vacuo</i>. This +electromagnetic hypothesis is by no means established, but it gives +the simplest of all possible results in respect to the propagation of +influence, which we therefore adopt.</p> + +<p>But what dynamical axes are we taking as at rest? Now our practical +choice gives a range<span class="pagenum" id="Page_227">[Pg 227]</span> of relative velocities small compared to that of +light. So except for certain refined experiments it does not matter. +There are two possibilities—</p> + +<p>(i) We may assume that one set of axes are at rest, and that the others +will show traces of motion in respect to the velocity of light; or—</p> + +<p>(ii) That the velocity of light is the same in all directions whichever +be the dynamical axes assumed.</p> + +<p>The first supposition is negatived by experiment, and hence we are +driven to the second supposition; which immediately lands us in the +whole theory of relativity.</p> + +<p>But if we will not have this theory we must reject the earlier +supposition that the velocity of light <i>in vacuo</i> is the same in +all directions. This we do, in fact, by assuming an ether, and assuming +a certain law for its modification. Then we, in fact, adopt the first +supposition so far as to hold that there are dynamical axes specially +at rest, namely, at rest relatively to the undisturbed ether. Then an +assumed law for the modification of the ether so alters the velocity of +light that we explain why no dynamical axes show traces of motion.</p> + +<p>I wish now to go back to the point which I made a few minutes ago, +that what we perceive at any instant is ancient history with its dates +hopelessly mixed. In the earlier part of my comments I emphasised the +point that our only<span class="pagenum" id="Page_228">[Pg 228]</span> data as to the physical world are our sensible +perceptions. We must not slip into the fallacy of assuming that we are +comparing a given world with given perceptions of it. The physical +world is in some general sense of the term a deduced concept.</p> + +<p>Our problem is, in fact, to fit the world to our perceptions, and not +our perceptions to the world.</p> + + +<p class="nindc space-above2"> +<span class="allsmcap">PRINTED IN GREAT BRITAIN BY RICHARD CLAY & SONS, LIMITED,<br> +BRUNSWICK ST., STAMFORD ST., S.E., AND BUNGAY, SUFFOLK.</span><br> +</p> + + +<hr class="chap x-ebookmaker-drop"> + +<div class="chapter"> +<h2 class="nobreak" id="From_WILLIAMS_NORGATES_LIST">From WILLIAMS & NORGATE'S LIST</h2> +</div> + + +<div class="blockquot"> + +<p class="hanging2"> +<b>A SPIRITUAL PILGRIMAGE.</b> By the Rev. <span class="allsmcap">R. J. CAMPBELL</span>. +(The Rev. R. J. Campbell's own Story of his Religious Life.) 2nd +Impression. Demy 8vo. <b>7s. 6d.</b> net.</p> +</div> + +<div class="blockquot"> + +<p>"This is eminently a book for which to be thankful—simple, +straightforward, kindly. Neither does it lack the saving grace of +humour."—<i>Guardian.</i></p> + +<p>"Mr. Campbell devotes a chapter to his re-ordination, and it must be +admitted that his defence of this act is effective."—<i>Methodist +Times.</i></p> +</div> + +<div class="blockquot"> + +<p class="hanging2 space-above2"> +<b>EDINBURGH.</b> By the Right Hon. Sir <span class="allsmcap">HERBERT MAXWELL</span>, +Bart., D.C.L., Author of "Life of the Duke of Wellington," "Scottish +Gardens," etc. President of the Society of Antiquaries of Scotland, +1910-13, and Chairman of the Royal Commission on Scottish Historical +Monuments. With a Coloured Frontispiece and 64 pages of Illustrations +of the past and present city. Medium 8vo. <b>10s. 6d.</b> net.</p> +</div> + +<div class="blockquot"> + +<p>A History of the Scottish Capital from the earliest times to the +nineteenth century.</p> +</div> + +<div class="blockquot"> + +<p class="hanging2 space-above2"> +<b>FURTHER PAGES OF MY LIFE.</b> By the Right Rev. <span class="allsmcap">W. BOYD +CARPENTER</span>, K.C.V.O., D.D., D.C.L., Formerly Bishop of Ripon, +Author of "Some Pages of My Life," "The Witness of Religious +Experience," etc. With Illustrations. Medium 8vo. <b>10s. 6d.</b> net.</p> +</div> + +<div class="blockquot"> + +<p>Reflections mingled with intimate reminiscences and recollections of +Royal personages and of men eminent in many spheres.</p> +</div> + +<div class="blockquot"> + +<p class="hanging2 space-above2"> +<b>SOME PAGES OF MY LIFE.</b> By the Right Rev. <span class="allsmcap">W. BOYD +CARPENTER</span>. New and Cheaper Edition. Large post 8vo. <b>5s.</b> +net.</p> +</div> + +<div class="blockquot"> + +<p>All who have listened to his eloquent preaching will read with delight +his musing on what life has brought the author.</p> +</div> + +<div class="blockquot"> + +<p class="hanging2 space-above2"> +<b>RAPHAEL MELDOLA</b>, Hon. D.Sc. (Oxon.), Hon. LL.D. (St. And.), +<span class="allsmcap">F.R.S.</span>, Professor of Chemistry in the City and Guilds of London +Technical College. Reminiscences of his worth and work, by those who +knew him, together with a Chronological List of his Publications +(1868-1915). Edited by <span class="allsmcap">JAMES MARCHANT</span>. With a Preface by the +Right Hon. <span class="allsmcap">LORD MOULTON</span>, K.C.B., F.R.S. With a Portrait. +Crown 8vo. <b>5s.</b> net.</p> +</div> + +<div class="blockquot"> + +<p>"The book is one of the most delightful biographies of scientific +men that have been published during recent years."—<i>Chemist and +Druggist.</i></p> +</div> + +<div class="blockquot"> + +<p class="hanging2 space-above2"> +<b>THE MANUFACTURE OF HISTORICAL MATERIAL.</b> An Elementary Study in +the Sources of Story. By <span class="allsmcap">J. W. JEUDWINE</span>, LL.B. (Camb.), of +Lincoln's Inn, Barrister-at-Law, Author of "The First Twelve Centuries +of British Story," and other works. Crown 8vo. <b>6s.</b> net.</p> +</div> + +<div class="blockquot"> + +<p>A consideration of the successive phases of Historical Research; it +explains necessary processes through which all the material has to +pass before it is placed before us as history.</p> +</div> + + +<p class="nindc space-above2">LONDON: WILLIAMS AND NORGATE</p> + + +<hr class="chap x-ebookmaker-drop"> + +<div class="chapter"> +<h2 class="nobreak" id="SOME_BOOKS_ON_RUSSIA_AND_POLAND">SOME BOOKS ON RUSSIA AND POLAND</h2> +</div> + + +<p class="nindc">With a Coloured Frontispiece, 12 Photogravure Plates, 28 Illustrations +in the text, and 8 Maps. Demy 8vo. <b>7s. 6d.</b> net (postage +<b>6d.</b> extra).</p> + + +<p class="nindc"><b>A Thousand Years of Russian History</b></p> + +<p class="nindc">By <span class="allsmcap">SONIA E. HOWE</span>.</p> + +<div class="blockquot"> + +<p>"We can recommend the volume as an excellent, careful, and +well-written history of a great nation."—<i>Daily Telegraph.</i></p> +</div> + +<hr class="chap"> + +<p class="nindc">Demy 8vo. Cloth, <b>6s.</b> net.</p> + +<p class="nindc"><b>The False Dmitri</b></p> + +<p class="nindc"> +A Russian Romance and Tragedy. Described by British Eye-witnesses, +1604-1612.</p> + +<p class="nindc"> +Edited with a Preface by <span class="allsmcap">SONIA E. HOWE.</span></p> + +<p class="nindc"> +Illustrated by reproduction of contemporary portraits.</p> + +<div class="blockquot"> + +<p>"With more than a whiff of the atmosphere Hakluyt got into his famous +volume."—<i>Northern Whig.</i></p> + +<p>"Of special interest at the present time."—<i>Oxford Chronicle.</i></p> +</div> + +<hr class="chap"> + +<p class="nindc"> +With 16 Plates and 28 Illustrations in the text. Demy 8vo. <b>7s. +6d.</b> net.</p> + +<p class="nindc"><b>Some Russian Heroes, Saints and Sinners</b></p> + +<p class="nindc"> +A portrait gallery of outstanding figures in Russian history who were +typical of their times and their country.</p> + +<p class="nindc"> +By <span class="allsmcap">SONIA E. HOWE.</span></p> + +<div class="blockquot"> + +<p class="nindc"> +"It gives a vivid study of Russia ... and interesting book."—<i>Land +and Water.</i></p> +</div> + +<hr class="chap"> + +<p class="nindc"> +Fcap. 8vo. Cloth, <b>1s. 3d.</b> net. In full leather presentation +binding, <b>2s. 6d.</b> net.</p> + +<p class="nindc"><b>An Outline of Russian Literature</b></p> + +<p class="nindc"> +By the Hon. <span class="allsmcap">MAURICE BARING,</span></p> + +<p class="nindc"> +Author of "With the Russians in Manchuria," "A Year in Russia," "The +Russian People," etc.</p> + +<div class="blockquot"> + +<p class="nindc"> +∵ Gives a clear and interesting account of the growth of Russian +literature.</p> +</div> + +<hr class="chap"> + +<p class="nindc"> +Fcap. 8vo. Cloth, <b>1s. 3d.</b> net. In full leather binding, <b>2s. +6d.</b> net.</p> + +<p class="nindc"><b>Poland</b></p> + +<p class="nindc"> +By <span class="allsmcap">W. ALISON PHILLIPS, M.A.,</span></p> + +<p class="nindc"> +Lecky Professor of Modern History in the University of Dublin.</p> + +<div class="blockquot"> + +<p class="nindc"> +∵ A concise survey of the History of Poland up to 1915.</p> +</div> + +<hr class="chap"> + +<p class="nindc space-above2"> +LONDON: WILLIAMS AND NORGATE<br> +14 HENRIETTA STREET, COVENT GARDEN, W.C.<br> +</p> + + +<hr class="chap x-ebookmaker-drop"> + +<div class="chapter"> +<div class="transnote spa1"> +<p class="nindc"><b>TRANSCRIBER’S NOTES</b></p> + +<p>Simple typographical errors have been silently corrected; unbalanced +quotation marks were remedied when the change was obvious, and +otherwise left unbalanced.</p> + +<p>Punctuation, hyphenation, and spelling were made consistent when a +predominant preference was found in the original book; otherwise they +were not changed. +</p> +</div></div> + +<div style='text-align:center'>*** END OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK 77011 ***</div> +</body> +</html> + + diff --git a/77011-h/images/1.svg b/77011-h/images/1.svg new file mode 100644 index 0000000..830b7aa --- /dev/null +++ b/77011-h/images/1.svg @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +<svg version="1.1" style="vertical-align: -0.781ex;" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="14957.8px" height="1228.9px" viewBox="0 -883.9 14957.8 1228.9" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><defs><path id="MJX-1-TEX-I-1D463" d="M173 380Q173 405 154 405Q130 405 104 376T61 287Q60 286 59 284T58 281T56 279T53 278T49 278T41 278H27Q21 284 21 287Q21 294 29 316T53 368T97 419T160 441Q202 441 225 417T249 361Q249 344 246 335Q246 329 231 291T200 202T182 113Q182 86 187 69Q200 26 250 26Q287 26 319 60T369 139T398 222T409 277Q409 300 401 317T383 343T365 361T357 383Q357 405 376 424T417 443Q436 443 451 425T467 367Q467 340 455 284T418 159T347 40T241 -11Q177 -11 139 22Q102 54 102 117Q102 148 110 181T151 298Q173 362 173 380Z"></path><path id="MJX-1-TEX-N-3D" d="M56 347Q56 360 70 367H707Q722 359 722 347Q722 336 708 328L390 327H72Q56 332 56 347ZM56 153Q56 168 72 173H708Q722 163 722 153Q722 140 707 133H70Q56 140 56 153Z"></path><path id="MJX-1-TEX-I-1D462" d="M21 287Q21 295 30 318T55 370T99 420T158 442Q204 442 227 417T250 358Q250 340 216 246T182 105Q182 62 196 45T238 27T291 44T328 78L339 95Q341 99 377 247Q407 367 413 387T427 416Q444 431 463 431Q480 431 488 421T496 402L420 84Q419 79 419 68Q419 43 426 35T447 26Q469 29 482 57T512 145Q514 153 532 153Q551 153 551 144Q550 139 549 130T540 98T523 55T498 17T462 -8Q454 -10 438 -10Q372 -10 347 46Q345 45 336 36T318 21T296 6T267 -6T233 -11Q189 -11 155 7Q103 38 103 113Q103 170 138 262T173 379Q173 380 173 381Q173 390 173 393T169 400T158 404H154Q131 404 112 385T82 344T65 302T57 280Q55 278 41 278H27Q21 284 21 287Z"></path><path id="MJX-1-TEX-N-2B" d="M56 237T56 250T70 270H369V420L370 570Q380 583 389 583Q402 583 409 568V270H707Q722 262 722 250T707 230H409V-68Q401 -82 391 -82H389H387Q375 -82 369 -68V230H70Q56 237 56 250Z"></path><path id="MJX-1-TEX-I-1D453" d="M118 -162Q120 -162 124 -164T135 -167T147 -168Q160 -168 171 -155T187 -126Q197 -99 221 27T267 267T289 382V385H242Q195 385 192 387Q188 390 188 397L195 425Q197 430 203 430T250 431Q298 431 298 432Q298 434 307 482T319 540Q356 705 465 705Q502 703 526 683T550 630Q550 594 529 578T487 561Q443 561 443 603Q443 622 454 636T478 657L487 662Q471 668 457 668Q445 668 434 658T419 630Q412 601 403 552T387 469T380 433Q380 431 435 431Q480 431 487 430T498 424Q499 420 496 407T491 391Q489 386 482 386T428 385H372L349 263Q301 15 282 -47Q255 -132 212 -173Q175 -205 139 -205Q107 -205 81 -186T55 -132Q55 -95 76 -78T118 -61Q162 -61 162 -103Q162 -122 151 -136T127 -157L118 -162Z"></path><path id="MJX-1-TEX-I-1D461" d="M26 385Q19 392 19 395Q19 399 22 411T27 425Q29 430 36 430T87 431H140L159 511Q162 522 166 540T173 566T179 586T187 603T197 615T211 624T229 626Q247 625 254 615T261 596Q261 589 252 549T232 470L222 433Q222 431 272 431H323Q330 424 330 420Q330 398 317 385H210L174 240Q135 80 135 68Q135 26 162 26Q197 26 230 60T283 144Q285 150 288 151T303 153H307Q322 153 322 145Q322 142 319 133Q314 117 301 95T267 48T216 6T155 -11Q125 -11 98 4T59 56Q57 64 57 83V101L92 241Q127 382 128 383Q128 385 77 385H26Z"></path><path id="MJX-1-TEX-N-2C" d="M78 35T78 60T94 103T137 121Q165 121 187 96T210 8Q210 -27 201 -60T180 -117T154 -158T130 -185T117 -194Q113 -194 104 -185T95 -172Q95 -168 106 -156T131 -126T157 -76T173 -3V9L172 8Q170 7 167 6T161 3T152 1T140 0Q113 0 96 17Z"></path><path id="MJX-1-TEX-N-61" d="M137 305T115 305T78 320T63 359Q63 394 97 421T218 448Q291 448 336 416T396 340Q401 326 401 309T402 194V124Q402 76 407 58T428 40Q443 40 448 56T453 109V145H493V106Q492 66 490 59Q481 29 455 12T400 -6T353 12T329 54V58L327 55Q325 52 322 49T314 40T302 29T287 17T269 6T247 -2T221 -8T190 -11Q130 -11 82 20T34 107Q34 128 41 147T68 188T116 225T194 253T304 268H318V290Q318 324 312 340Q290 411 215 411Q197 411 181 410T156 406T148 403Q170 388 170 359Q170 334 154 320ZM126 106Q126 75 150 51T209 26Q247 26 276 49T315 109Q317 116 318 175Q318 233 317 233Q309 233 296 232T251 223T193 203T147 166T126 106Z"></path><path id="MJX-1-TEX-N-6E" d="M41 46H55Q94 46 102 60V68Q102 77 102 91T102 122T103 161T103 203Q103 234 103 269T102 328V351Q99 370 88 376T43 385H25V408Q25 431 27 431L37 432Q47 433 65 434T102 436Q119 437 138 438T167 441T178 442H181V402Q181 364 182 364T187 369T199 384T218 402T247 421T285 437Q305 442 336 442Q450 438 463 329Q464 322 464 190V104Q464 66 466 59T477 49Q498 46 526 46H542V0H534L510 1Q487 2 460 2T422 3Q319 3 310 0H302V46H318Q379 46 379 62Q380 64 380 200Q379 335 378 343Q372 371 358 385T334 402T308 404Q263 404 229 370Q202 343 195 315T187 232V168V108Q187 78 188 68T191 55T200 49Q221 46 249 46H265V0H257L234 1Q210 2 183 2T145 3Q42 3 33 0H25V46H41Z"></path><path id="MJX-1-TEX-N-64" d="M376 495Q376 511 376 535T377 568Q377 613 367 624T316 637H298V660Q298 683 300 683L310 684Q320 685 339 686T376 688Q393 689 413 690T443 693T454 694H457V390Q457 84 458 81Q461 61 472 55T517 46H535V0Q533 0 459 -5T380 -11H373V44L365 37Q307 -11 235 -11Q158 -11 96 50T34 215Q34 315 97 378T244 442Q319 442 376 393V495ZM373 342Q328 405 260 405Q211 405 173 369Q146 341 139 305T131 211Q131 155 138 120T173 59Q203 26 251 26Q322 26 373 103V342Z"></path><path id="MJX-1-TEX-I-1D460" d="M131 289Q131 321 147 354T203 415T300 442Q362 442 390 415T419 355Q419 323 402 308T364 292Q351 292 340 300T328 326Q328 342 337 354T354 372T367 378Q368 378 368 379Q368 382 361 388T336 399T297 405Q249 405 227 379T204 326Q204 301 223 291T278 274T330 259Q396 230 396 163Q396 135 385 107T352 51T289 7T195 -10Q118 -10 86 19T53 87Q53 126 74 143T118 160Q133 160 146 151T160 120Q160 94 142 76T111 58Q109 57 108 57T107 55Q108 52 115 47T146 34T201 27Q237 27 263 38T301 66T318 97T323 122Q323 150 302 164T254 181T195 196T148 231Q131 256 131 289Z"></path><path id="MJX-1-TEX-N-31" d="M213 578L200 573Q186 568 160 563T102 556H83V602H102Q149 604 189 617T245 641T273 663Q275 666 285 666Q294 666 302 660V361L303 61Q310 54 315 52T339 48T401 46H427V0H416Q395 3 257 3Q121 3 100 0H88V46H114Q136 46 152 46T177 47T193 50T201 52T207 57T213 61V578Z"></path><path id="MJX-1-TEX-N-32" d="M109 429Q82 429 66 447T50 491Q50 562 103 614T235 666Q326 666 387 610T449 465Q449 422 429 383T381 315T301 241Q265 210 201 149L142 93L218 92Q375 92 385 97Q392 99 409 186V189H449V186Q448 183 436 95T421 3V0H50V19V31Q50 38 56 46T86 81Q115 113 136 137Q145 147 170 174T204 211T233 244T261 278T284 308T305 340T320 369T333 401T340 431T343 464Q343 527 309 573T212 619Q179 619 154 602T119 569T109 550Q109 549 114 549Q132 549 151 535T170 489Q170 464 154 447T109 429Z"></path></defs><g stroke="currentColor" fill="currentColor" stroke-width="0" transform="scale(1,-1)"><g ><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-1-TEX-I-1D463"></use></g><g transform="translate(762.8,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-1-TEX-N-3D"></use></g><g transform="translate(1818.6,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-1-TEX-I-1D462"></use></g><g transform="translate(2612.8,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-1-TEX-N-2B"></use></g><g transform="translate(3613,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-1-TEX-I-1D453"></use></g><g transform="translate(4163,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-1-TEX-I-1D461"></use></g><g transform="translate(4524,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-1-TEX-N-2C"></use></g><g transform="translate(4802,0)"><g ></g></g><g transform="translate(5968.7,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-1-TEX-N-61"></use><use xlink:href="#MJX-1-TEX-N-6E" transform="translate(500,0)"></use><use xlink:href="#MJX-1-TEX-N-64" transform="translate(1056,0)"></use></g><g transform="translate(7580.7,0)"><g ></g></g><g transform="translate(8580.7,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-1-TEX-I-1D460"></use></g><g transform="translate(9327.4,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-1-TEX-N-3D"></use></g><g transform="translate(10383.2,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-1-TEX-I-1D462"></use></g><g transform="translate(10955.2,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-1-TEX-I-1D461"></use></g><g transform="translate(11538.4,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-1-TEX-N-2B"></use></g><g transform="translate(12538.7,0)"><g ><g transform="translate(220,394) scale(0.707)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-1-TEX-N-31"></use></g><g transform="translate(220,-345) scale(0.707)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-1-TEX-N-32"></use></g><rect width="553.6" height="60" x="120" y="220"></rect></g></g><g transform="translate(13332.2,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-1-TEX-I-1D453"></use></g><g transform="translate(13882.2,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-1-TEX-I-1D461"></use></g><g transform="translate(14243.2,0)"><g ><g ></g><g transform="translate(33,413) scale(0.707)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-1-TEX-N-32"></use></g></g></g><g transform="translate(14679.8,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-1-TEX-N-2C"></use></g></g></g></svg>
\ No newline at end of file diff --git a/77011-h/images/10.svg b/77011-h/images/10.svg new file mode 100644 index 0000000..c6cafc9 --- /dev/null +++ b/77011-h/images/10.svg @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +<svg version="1.1" style="vertical-align: -5.421ex;" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="13746.9px" height="5291.7px" viewBox="0 -2895.9 13746.9 5291.7" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><defs><path id="MJX-56-TEX-N-58" d="M270 0Q252 3 141 3Q46 3 31 0H23V46H40Q129 50 161 88Q165 94 244 216T324 339Q324 341 235 480T143 622Q133 631 119 634T57 637H37V683H46Q64 680 172 680Q297 680 318 683H329V637H324Q307 637 286 632T263 621Q263 618 322 525T384 431Q385 431 437 511T489 593Q490 595 490 599Q490 611 477 622T436 637H428V683H437Q455 680 566 680Q661 680 676 683H684V637H667Q585 634 551 599Q548 596 478 491Q412 388 412 387Q412 385 514 225T620 62Q628 53 642 50T695 46H726V0H717Q699 3 591 3Q466 3 445 0H434V46H440Q454 46 476 51T499 64Q499 67 463 124T390 238L353 295L350 292Q348 290 343 283T331 265T312 236T286 195Q219 88 218 84Q218 70 234 59T272 46H280V0H270Z"></path><path id="MJX-56-TEX-N-32" d="M109 429Q82 429 66 447T50 491Q50 562 103 614T235 666Q326 666 387 610T449 465Q449 422 429 383T381 315T301 241Q265 210 201 149L142 93L218 92Q375 92 385 97Q392 99 409 186V189H449V186Q448 183 436 95T421 3V0H50V19V31Q50 38 56 46T86 81Q115 113 136 137Q145 147 170 174T204 211T233 244T261 278T284 308T305 340T320 369T333 401T340 431T343 464Q343 527 309 573T212 619Q179 619 154 602T119 569T109 550Q109 549 114 549Q132 549 151 535T170 489Q170 464 154 447T109 429Z"></path><path id="MJX-56-TEX-N-2B" d="M56 237T56 250T70 270H369V420L370 570Q380 583 389 583Q402 583 409 568V270H707Q722 262 722 250T707 230H409V-68Q401 -82 391 -82H389H387Q375 -82 369 -68V230H70Q56 237 56 250Z"></path><path id="MJX-56-TEX-I-1D6FD" d="M29 -194Q23 -188 23 -186Q23 -183 102 134T186 465Q208 533 243 584T309 658Q365 705 429 705H431Q493 705 533 667T573 570Q573 465 469 396L482 383Q533 332 533 252Q533 139 448 65T257 -10Q227 -10 203 -2T165 17T143 40T131 59T126 65L62 -188Q60 -194 42 -194H29ZM353 431Q392 431 427 419L432 422Q436 426 439 429T449 439T461 453T472 471T484 495T493 524T501 560Q503 569 503 593Q503 611 502 616Q487 667 426 667Q384 667 347 643T286 582T247 514T224 455Q219 439 186 308T152 168Q151 163 151 147Q151 99 173 68Q204 26 260 26Q302 26 349 51T425 137Q441 171 449 214T457 279Q457 337 422 372Q380 358 347 358H337Q258 358 258 389Q258 396 261 403Q275 431 353 431Z"></path><path id="MJX-56-TEX-I-1D44C" d="M66 637Q54 637 49 637T39 638T32 641T30 647T33 664T42 682Q44 683 56 683Q104 680 165 680Q288 680 306 683H316Q322 677 322 674T320 656Q316 643 310 637H298Q242 637 242 624Q242 619 292 477T343 333L346 336Q350 340 358 349T379 373T411 410T454 461Q546 568 561 587T577 618Q577 634 545 637Q528 637 528 647Q528 649 530 661Q533 676 535 679T549 683Q551 683 578 682T657 680Q684 680 713 681T746 682Q763 682 763 673Q763 669 760 657T755 643Q753 637 734 637Q662 632 617 587Q608 578 477 424L348 273L322 169Q295 62 295 57Q295 46 363 46Q379 46 384 45T390 35Q390 33 388 23Q384 6 382 4T366 1Q361 1 324 1T232 2Q170 2 138 2T102 1Q84 1 84 9Q84 14 87 24Q88 27 89 30T90 35T91 39T93 42T96 44T101 45T107 45T116 46T129 46Q168 47 180 50T198 63Q201 68 227 171L252 274L129 623Q128 624 127 625T125 627T122 629T118 631T113 633T105 634T96 635T83 636T66 637Z"></path><path id="MJX-56-TEX-I-1D6FE" d="M31 249Q11 249 11 258Q11 275 26 304T66 365T129 418T206 441Q233 441 239 440Q287 429 318 386T371 255Q385 195 385 170Q385 166 386 166L398 193Q418 244 443 300T486 391T508 430Q510 431 524 431H537Q543 425 543 422Q543 418 522 378T463 251T391 71Q385 55 378 6T357 -100Q341 -165 330 -190T303 -216Q286 -216 286 -188Q286 -138 340 32L346 51L347 69Q348 79 348 100Q348 257 291 317Q251 355 196 355Q148 355 108 329T51 260Q49 251 47 251Q45 249 31 249Z"></path><path id="MJX-56-TEX-N-5A" d="M69 443Q69 452 74 554T80 683H549Q555 677 555 664Q555 649 554 648Q552 645 366 348T179 50T192 49T263 49H275H302Q333 49 353 50T401 59T447 78T482 115T507 173Q513 200 520 273V282H560V274Q560 272 552 143T543 8V0H302L61 1L58 3Q55 8 55 21V35Q59 43 153 193T340 489T432 637H343Q259 637 214 625T141 573Q109 523 109 445Q109 443 89 443H69Z"></path><path id="MJX-56-TEX-I-1D6FF" d="M195 609Q195 656 227 686T302 717Q319 716 351 709T407 697T433 690Q451 682 451 662Q451 644 438 628T403 612Q382 612 348 641T288 671T249 657T235 628Q235 584 334 463Q401 379 401 292Q401 169 340 80T205 -10H198Q127 -10 83 36T36 153Q36 286 151 382Q191 413 252 434Q252 435 245 449T230 481T214 521T201 566T195 609ZM112 130Q112 83 136 55T204 27Q233 27 256 51T291 111T309 178T316 232Q316 267 309 298T295 344T269 400L259 396Q215 381 183 342T137 256T118 179T112 130Z"></path><path id="MJX-56-TEX-N-3D" d="M56 347Q56 360 70 367H707Q722 359 722 347Q722 336 708 328L390 327H72Q56 332 56 347ZM56 153Q56 168 72 173H708Q722 163 722 153Q722 140 707 133H70Q56 140 56 153Z"></path><path id="MJX-56-TEX-I-1D45F" d="M21 287Q22 290 23 295T28 317T38 348T53 381T73 411T99 433T132 442Q161 442 183 430T214 408T225 388Q227 382 228 382T236 389Q284 441 347 441H350Q398 441 422 400Q430 381 430 363Q430 333 417 315T391 292T366 288Q346 288 334 299T322 328Q322 376 378 392Q356 405 342 405Q286 405 239 331Q229 315 224 298T190 165Q156 25 151 16Q138 -11 108 -11Q95 -11 87 -5T76 7T74 17Q74 30 114 189T154 366Q154 405 128 405Q107 405 92 377T68 316T57 280Q55 278 41 278H27Q21 284 21 287Z"></path><path id="MJX-56-TEX-N-2C" d="M78 35T78 60T94 103T137 121Q165 121 187 96T210 8Q210 -27 201 -60T180 -117T154 -158T130 -185T117 -194Q113 -194 104 -185T95 -172Q95 -168 106 -156T131 -126T157 -76T173 -3V9L172 8Q170 7 167 6T161 3T152 1T140 0Q113 0 96 17Z"></path><path id="MJX-56-TEX-I-1D456" d="M184 600Q184 624 203 642T247 661Q265 661 277 649T290 619Q290 596 270 577T226 557Q211 557 198 567T184 600ZM21 287Q21 295 30 318T54 369T98 420T158 442Q197 442 223 419T250 357Q250 340 236 301T196 196T154 83Q149 61 149 51Q149 26 166 26Q175 26 185 29T208 43T235 78T260 137Q263 149 265 151T282 153Q302 153 302 143Q302 135 293 112T268 61T223 11T161 -11Q129 -11 102 10T74 74Q74 91 79 106T122 220Q160 321 166 341T173 380Q173 404 156 404H154Q124 404 99 371T61 287Q60 286 59 284T58 281T56 279T53 278T49 278T41 278H27Q21 284 21 287Z"></path><path id="MJX-56-TEX-I-2E" d="M107 50Q107 76 129 98T181 121Q203 121 217 108T231 72Q231 47 210 24T156 0Q135 0 121 13T107 50Z"></path><path id="MJX-56-TEX-I-1D452" d="M39 168Q39 225 58 272T107 350T174 402T244 433T307 442H310Q355 442 388 420T421 355Q421 265 310 237Q261 224 176 223Q139 223 138 221Q138 219 132 186T125 128Q125 81 146 54T209 26T302 45T394 111Q403 121 406 121Q410 121 419 112T429 98T420 82T390 55T344 24T281 -1T205 -11Q126 -11 83 42T39 168ZM373 353Q367 405 305 405Q272 405 244 391T199 357T170 316T154 280T149 261Q149 260 169 260Q282 260 327 284T373 353Z"></path><path id="MJX-56-TEX-N-2E" d="M78 60Q78 84 95 102T138 120Q162 120 180 104T199 61Q199 36 182 18T139 0T96 17T78 60Z"></path></defs><g stroke="currentColor" fill="currentColor" stroke-width="0" transform="scale(1,-1)"><g ><g ><g transform="translate(0,1385.9)"><g ></g><g transform="translate(2425,0)"><g ><g ><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-56-TEX-N-58"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(783,363) scale(0.707)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-56-TEX-N-32"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(1408.8,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-56-TEX-N-2B"></use></g><g transform="translate(2409,0)"><g ><g transform="translate(220,676)"><g ><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-56-TEX-I-1D6FD"></use></g><g transform="translate(599,363) scale(0.707)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-56-TEX-N-32"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(1002.6,0)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-56-TEX-I-1D44C"></use></g><g transform="translate(855.1,363) scale(0.707)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-56-TEX-N-32"></use></g></g></g><g transform="translate(835.2,-719.9)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-56-TEX-I-1D6FE"></use></g><g transform="translate(627.3,289) scale(0.707)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-56-TEX-N-32"></use></g></g><rect width="2461.2" height="60" x="120" y="220"></rect></g></g><g transform="translate(5332.4,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-56-TEX-N-2B"></use></g><g transform="translate(6332.6,0)"><g ><g transform="translate(220,676)"><g ><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-56-TEX-I-1D6FD"></use></g><g transform="translate(599,363) scale(0.707)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-56-TEX-N-32"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(1002.6,0)"><g ><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-56-TEX-N-5A"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(644,363) scale(0.707)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-56-TEX-N-32"></use></g></g></g><g transform="translate(804.8,-719.9)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-56-TEX-I-1D6FF"></use></g><g transform="translate(477,289) scale(0.707)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-56-TEX-N-32"></use></g></g><rect width="2250.1" height="60" x="120" y="220"></rect></g></g><g transform="translate(9100.5,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-56-TEX-N-3D"></use></g><g transform="translate(10156.3,0)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-56-TEX-I-1D45F"></use></g><g transform="translate(484,363) scale(0.707)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-56-TEX-N-32"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(11043.9,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-56-TEX-N-2C"></use></g></g></g><g transform="translate(0,-1459.9)"><g ><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-56-TEX-I-1D456"></use><use xlink:href="#MJX-56-TEX-I-2E" transform="translate(345,0)"></use><use xlink:href="#MJX-56-TEX-I-1D452" transform="translate(652,0)"></use><use xlink:href="#MJX-56-TEX-I-2E" transform="translate(1118,0)"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(2425,0)"><g ><g ><g transform="translate(220,676)"><g ><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-56-TEX-N-58"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(783,363) scale(0.707)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-56-TEX-N-32"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(312,-719.9)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-56-TEX-I-1D6FD"></use></g><g transform="translate(599,289) scale(0.707)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-56-TEX-N-32"></use></g></g><rect width="1386.6" height="60" x="120" y="220"></rect></g></g><g transform="translate(1848.8,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-56-TEX-N-2B"></use></g><g transform="translate(2849,0)"><g ><g transform="translate(220,676)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-56-TEX-I-1D44C"></use></g><g transform="translate(855.1,363) scale(0.707)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-56-TEX-N-32"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(333.9,-719.9)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-56-TEX-I-1D6FE"></use></g><g transform="translate(627.3,289) scale(0.707)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-56-TEX-N-32"></use></g></g><rect width="1458.7" height="60" x="120" y="220"></rect></g></g><g transform="translate(4769.9,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-56-TEX-N-2B"></use></g><g transform="translate(5770.1,0)"><g ><g transform="translate(220,676)"><g ><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-56-TEX-N-5A"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(644,363) scale(0.707)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-56-TEX-N-32"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(303.5,-719.9)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-56-TEX-I-1D6FF"></use></g><g transform="translate(477,289) scale(0.707)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-56-TEX-N-32"></use></g></g><rect width="1247.6" height="60" x="120" y="220"></rect></g></g><g transform="translate(7535.4,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-56-TEX-N-3D"></use></g><g transform="translate(8591.2,0)"><g ><g transform="translate(277.5,676)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-56-TEX-I-1D45F"></use></g><g transform="translate(484,363) scale(0.707)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-56-TEX-N-32"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(220,-719.9)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-56-TEX-I-1D6FD"></use></g><g transform="translate(599,289) scale(0.707)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-56-TEX-N-32"></use></g></g><rect width="1202.6" height="60" x="120" y="220"></rect></g></g><g transform="translate(10033.8,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-56-TEX-N-2E"></use></g></g></g></g></g></g></svg>
\ No newline at end of file diff --git a/77011-h/images/11.svg b/77011-h/images/11.svg new file mode 100644 index 0000000..a137f18 --- /dev/null +++ b/77011-h/images/11.svg @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +<svg version="1.1" style="vertical-align: -0.489ex;" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="4220.1px" height="933px" viewBox="0 -717 4220.1 933" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><defs><path id="MJX-57-TEX-I-1D6FD" d="M29 -194Q23 -188 23 -186Q23 -183 102 134T186 465Q208 533 243 584T309 658Q365 705 429 705H431Q493 705 533 667T573 570Q573 465 469 396L482 383Q533 332 533 252Q533 139 448 65T257 -10Q227 -10 203 -2T165 17T143 40T131 59T126 65L62 -188Q60 -194 42 -194H29ZM353 431Q392 431 427 419L432 422Q436 426 439 429T449 439T461 453T472 471T484 495T493 524T501 560Q503 569 503 593Q503 611 502 616Q487 667 426 667Q384 667 347 643T286 582T247 514T224 455Q219 439 186 308T152 168Q151 163 151 147Q151 99 173 68Q204 26 260 26Q302 26 349 51T425 137Q441 171 449 214T457 279Q457 337 422 372Q380 358 347 358H337Q258 358 258 389Q258 396 261 403Q275 431 353 431Z"></path><path id="MJX-57-TEX-N-2260" d="M166 -215T159 -215T147 -212T141 -204T139 -197Q139 -190 144 -183L306 133H70Q56 140 56 153Q56 168 72 173H327L406 327H72Q56 332 56 347Q56 360 70 367H426Q597 702 602 707Q605 716 618 716Q625 716 630 712T636 703T638 696Q638 692 471 367H707Q722 359 722 347Q722 336 708 328L451 327L371 173H708Q722 163 722 153Q722 140 707 133H351Q175 -210 170 -212Q166 -215 159 -215Z"></path><path id="MJX-57-TEX-I-1D6FE" d="M31 249Q11 249 11 258Q11 275 26 304T66 365T129 418T206 441Q233 441 239 440Q287 429 318 386T371 255Q385 195 385 170Q385 166 386 166L398 193Q418 244 443 300T486 391T508 430Q510 431 524 431H537Q543 425 543 422Q543 418 522 378T463 251T391 71Q385 55 378 6T357 -100Q341 -165 330 -190T303 -216Q286 -216 286 -188Q286 -138 340 32L346 51L347 69Q348 79 348 100Q348 257 291 317Q251 355 196 355Q148 355 108 329T51 260Q49 251 47 251Q45 249 31 249Z"></path><path id="MJX-57-TEX-I-1D6FF" d="M195 609Q195 656 227 686T302 717Q319 716 351 709T407 697T433 690Q451 682 451 662Q451 644 438 628T403 612Q382 612 348 641T288 671T249 657T235 628Q235 584 334 463Q401 379 401 292Q401 169 340 80T205 -10H198Q127 -10 83 36T36 153Q36 286 151 382Q191 413 252 434Q252 435 245 449T230 481T214 521T201 566T195 609ZM112 130Q112 83 136 55T204 27Q233 27 256 51T291 111T309 178T316 232Q316 267 309 298T295 344T269 400L259 396Q215 381 183 342T137 256T118 179T112 130Z"></path></defs><g stroke="currentColor" fill="currentColor" stroke-width="0" transform="scale(1,-1)"><g ><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-57-TEX-I-1D6FD"></use></g><g transform="translate(843.8,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-57-TEX-N-2260"></use></g><g transform="translate(1899.6,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-57-TEX-I-1D6FE"></use></g><g transform="translate(2720.3,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-57-TEX-N-2260"></use></g><g transform="translate(3776.1,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-57-TEX-I-1D6FF"></use></g></g></g></svg>
\ No newline at end of file diff --git a/77011-h/images/12.svg b/77011-h/images/12.svg new file mode 100644 index 0000000..a9768c1 --- /dev/null +++ b/77011-h/images/12.svg @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +<svg version="1.1" style="vertical-align: -0.489ex;" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="2320.6px" height="933px" viewBox="0 -717 2320.6 933" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><defs><path id="MJX-58-TEX-I-1D6FE" d="M31 249Q11 249 11 258Q11 275 26 304T66 365T129 418T206 441Q233 441 239 440Q287 429 318 386T371 255Q385 195 385 170Q385 166 386 166L398 193Q418 244 443 300T486 391T508 430Q510 431 524 431H537Q543 425 543 422Q543 418 522 378T463 251T391 71Q385 55 378 6T357 -100Q341 -165 330 -190T303 -216Q286 -216 286 -188Q286 -138 340 32L346 51L347 69Q348 79 348 100Q348 257 291 317Q251 355 196 355Q148 355 108 329T51 260Q49 251 47 251Q45 249 31 249Z"></path><path id="MJX-58-TEX-N-3D" d="M56 347Q56 360 70 367H707Q722 359 722 347Q722 336 708 328L390 327H72Q56 332 56 347ZM56 153Q56 168 72 173H708Q722 163 722 153Q722 140 707 133H70Q56 140 56 153Z"></path><path id="MJX-58-TEX-I-1D6FF" d="M195 609Q195 656 227 686T302 717Q319 716 351 709T407 697T433 690Q451 682 451 662Q451 644 438 628T403 612Q382 612 348 641T288 671T249 657T235 628Q235 584 334 463Q401 379 401 292Q401 169 340 80T205 -10H198Q127 -10 83 36T36 153Q36 286 151 382Q191 413 252 434Q252 435 245 449T230 481T214 521T201 566T195 609ZM112 130Q112 83 136 55T204 27Q233 27 256 51T291 111T309 178T316 232Q316 267 309 298T295 344T269 400L259 396Q215 381 183 342T137 256T118 179T112 130Z"></path></defs><g stroke="currentColor" fill="currentColor" stroke-width="0" transform="scale(1,-1)"><g ><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-58-TEX-I-1D6FE"></use></g><g transform="translate(820.8,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-58-TEX-N-3D"></use></g><g transform="translate(1876.6,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-58-TEX-I-1D6FF"></use></g></g></g></svg>
\ No newline at end of file diff --git a/77011-h/images/13.svg b/77011-h/images/13.svg new file mode 100644 index 0000000..2b08eda --- /dev/null +++ b/77011-h/images/13.svg @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +<svg version="1.1" style="vertical-align: -0.489ex;" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="2442.6px" height="932px" viewBox="0 -716 2442.6 932" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><defs><path id="MJX-59-TEX-I-1D6FD" d="M29 -194Q23 -188 23 -186Q23 -183 102 134T186 465Q208 533 243 584T309 658Q365 705 429 705H431Q493 705 533 667T573 570Q573 465 469 396L482 383Q533 332 533 252Q533 139 448 65T257 -10Q227 -10 203 -2T165 17T143 40T131 59T126 65L62 -188Q60 -194 42 -194H29ZM353 431Q392 431 427 419L432 422Q436 426 439 429T449 439T461 453T472 471T484 495T493 524T501 560Q503 569 503 593Q503 611 502 616Q487 667 426 667Q384 667 347 643T286 582T247 514T224 455Q219 439 186 308T152 168Q151 163 151 147Q151 99 173 68Q204 26 260 26Q302 26 349 51T425 137Q441 171 449 214T457 279Q457 337 422 372Q380 358 347 358H337Q258 358 258 389Q258 396 261 403Q275 431 353 431Z"></path><path id="MJX-59-TEX-N-2260" d="M166 -215T159 -215T147 -212T141 -204T139 -197Q139 -190 144 -183L306 133H70Q56 140 56 153Q56 168 72 173H327L406 327H72Q56 332 56 347Q56 360 70 367H426Q597 702 602 707Q605 716 618 716Q625 716 630 712T636 703T638 696Q638 692 471 367H707Q722 359 722 347Q722 336 708 328L451 327L371 173H708Q722 163 722 153Q722 140 707 133H351Q175 -210 170 -212Q166 -215 159 -215Z"></path><path id="MJX-59-TEX-I-1D6FE" d="M31 249Q11 249 11 258Q11 275 26 304T66 365T129 418T206 441Q233 441 239 440Q287 429 318 386T371 255Q385 195 385 170Q385 166 386 166L398 193Q418 244 443 300T486 391T508 430Q510 431 524 431H537Q543 425 543 422Q543 418 522 378T463 251T391 71Q385 55 378 6T357 -100Q341 -165 330 -190T303 -216Q286 -216 286 -188Q286 -138 340 32L346 51L347 69Q348 79 348 100Q348 257 291 317Q251 355 196 355Q148 355 108 329T51 260Q49 251 47 251Q45 249 31 249Z"></path></defs><g stroke="currentColor" fill="currentColor" stroke-width="0" transform="scale(1,-1)"><g ><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-59-TEX-I-1D6FD"></use></g><g transform="translate(843.8,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-59-TEX-N-2260"></use></g><g transform="translate(1899.6,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-59-TEX-I-1D6FE"></use></g></g></g></svg>
\ No newline at end of file diff --git a/77011-h/images/14.svg b/77011-h/images/14.svg new file mode 100644 index 0000000..d656e03 --- /dev/null +++ b/77011-h/images/14.svg @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +<svg version="1.1" style="vertical-align: -0.025ex;" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="571px" height="442px" viewBox="0 -431 571 442" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><defs><path id="MJX-66-TEX-I-1D70E" d="M184 -11Q116 -11 74 34T31 147Q31 247 104 333T274 430Q275 431 414 431H552Q553 430 555 429T559 427T562 425T565 422T567 420T569 416T570 412T571 407T572 401Q572 357 507 357Q500 357 490 357T476 358H416L421 348Q439 310 439 263Q439 153 359 71T184 -11ZM361 278Q361 358 276 358Q152 358 115 184Q114 180 114 178Q106 141 106 117Q106 67 131 47T188 26Q242 26 287 73Q316 103 334 153T356 233T361 278Z"></path></defs><g stroke="currentColor" fill="currentColor" stroke-width="0" transform="scale(1,-1)"><g ><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-66-TEX-I-1D70E"></use></g></g></g></svg>
\ No newline at end of file diff --git a/77011-h/images/15.svg b/77011-h/images/15.svg new file mode 100644 index 0000000..de28378 --- /dev/null +++ b/77011-h/images/15.svg @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +<svg version="1.1" style="vertical-align: -0.566ex;" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="14058.8px" height="1059px" viewBox="0 -809 14058.8 1059" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><defs><path id="MJX-67-TEX-I-1D465" d="M52 289Q59 331 106 386T222 442Q257 442 286 424T329 379Q371 442 430 442Q467 442 494 420T522 361Q522 332 508 314T481 292T458 288Q439 288 427 299T415 328Q415 374 465 391Q454 404 425 404Q412 404 406 402Q368 386 350 336Q290 115 290 78Q290 50 306 38T341 26Q378 26 414 59T463 140Q466 150 469 151T485 153H489Q504 153 504 145Q504 144 502 134Q486 77 440 33T333 -11Q263 -11 227 52Q186 -10 133 -10H127Q78 -10 57 16T35 71Q35 103 54 123T99 143Q142 143 142 101Q142 81 130 66T107 46T94 41L91 40Q91 39 97 36T113 29T132 26Q168 26 194 71Q203 87 217 139T245 247T261 313Q266 340 266 352Q266 380 251 392T217 404Q177 404 142 372T93 290Q91 281 88 280T72 278H58Q52 284 52 289Z"></path><path id="MJX-67-TEX-V-2032" d="M79 43Q73 43 52 49T30 61Q30 68 85 293T146 528Q161 560 198 560Q218 560 240 545T262 501Q262 496 260 486Q259 479 173 263T84 45T79 43Z"></path><path id="MJX-67-TEX-N-3D" d="M56 347Q56 360 70 367H707Q722 359 722 347Q722 336 708 328L390 327H72Q56 332 56 347ZM56 153Q56 168 72 173H708Q722 163 722 153Q722 140 707 133H70Q56 140 56 153Z"></path><path id="MJX-67-TEX-I-1D6FD" d="M29 -194Q23 -188 23 -186Q23 -183 102 134T186 465Q208 533 243 584T309 658Q365 705 429 705H431Q493 705 533 667T573 570Q573 465 469 396L482 383Q533 332 533 252Q533 139 448 65T257 -10Q227 -10 203 -2T165 17T143 40T131 59T126 65L62 -188Q60 -194 42 -194H29ZM353 431Q392 431 427 419L432 422Q436 426 439 429T449 439T461 453T472 471T484 495T493 524T501 560Q503 569 503 593Q503 611 502 616Q487 667 426 667Q384 667 347 643T286 582T247 514T224 455Q219 439 186 308T152 168Q151 163 151 147Q151 99 173 68Q204 26 260 26Q302 26 349 51T425 137Q441 171 449 214T457 279Q457 337 422 372Q380 358 347 358H337Q258 358 258 389Q258 396 261 403Q275 431 353 431Z"></path><path id="MJX-67-TEX-N-28" d="M94 250Q94 319 104 381T127 488T164 576T202 643T244 695T277 729T302 750H315H319Q333 750 333 741Q333 738 316 720T275 667T226 581T184 443T167 250T184 58T225 -81T274 -167T316 -220T333 -241Q333 -250 318 -250H315H302L274 -226Q180 -141 137 -14T94 250Z"></path><path id="MJX-67-TEX-N-2212" d="M84 237T84 250T98 270H679Q694 262 694 250T679 230H98Q84 237 84 250Z"></path><path id="MJX-67-TEX-I-1D709" d="M268 632Q268 704 296 704Q314 704 314 687Q314 682 311 664T308 635T309 620V616H315Q342 619 360 619Q443 619 443 586Q439 548 358 546H344Q326 546 317 549T290 566Q257 550 226 505T195 405Q195 381 201 364T211 342T218 337Q266 347 298 347Q375 347 375 314Q374 297 359 288T327 277T280 275Q234 275 208 283L195 286Q149 260 119 214T88 130Q88 116 90 108Q101 79 129 63T229 20Q238 17 243 15Q337 -21 354 -33Q383 -53 383 -94Q383 -137 351 -171T273 -205Q240 -205 202 -190T158 -167Q156 -163 156 -159Q156 -151 161 -146T176 -140Q182 -140 189 -143Q232 -168 274 -168Q286 -168 292 -165Q313 -151 313 -129Q313 -112 301 -104T232 -75Q214 -68 204 -64Q198 -62 171 -52T136 -38T107 -24T78 -8T56 12T36 37T26 66T21 103Q21 149 55 206T145 301L154 307L148 313Q141 319 136 323T124 338T111 358T103 382T99 413Q99 471 143 524T259 602L271 607Q268 618 268 632Z"></path><path id="MJX-67-TEX-N-29" d="M60 749L64 750Q69 750 74 750H86L114 726Q208 641 251 514T294 250Q294 182 284 119T261 12T224 -76T186 -143T145 -194T113 -227T90 -246Q87 -249 86 -250H74Q66 -250 63 -250T58 -247T55 -238Q56 -237 66 -225Q221 -64 221 250T66 725Q56 737 55 738Q55 746 60 749Z"></path><path id="MJX-67-TEX-N-2C" d="M78 35T78 60T94 103T137 121Q165 121 187 96T210 8Q210 -27 201 -60T180 -117T154 -158T130 -185T117 -194Q113 -194 104 -185T95 -172Q95 -168 106 -156T131 -126T157 -76T173 -3V9L172 8Q170 7 167 6T161 3T152 1T140 0Q113 0 96 17Z"></path><path id="MJX-67-TEX-I-1D466" d="M21 287Q21 301 36 335T84 406T158 442Q199 442 224 419T250 355Q248 336 247 334Q247 331 231 288T198 191T182 105Q182 62 196 45T238 27Q261 27 281 38T312 61T339 94Q339 95 344 114T358 173T377 247Q415 397 419 404Q432 431 462 431Q475 431 483 424T494 412T496 403Q496 390 447 193T391 -23Q363 -106 294 -155T156 -205Q111 -205 77 -183T43 -117Q43 -95 50 -80T69 -58T89 -48T106 -45Q150 -45 150 -87Q150 -107 138 -122T115 -142T102 -147L99 -148Q101 -153 118 -160T152 -167H160Q177 -167 186 -165Q219 -156 247 -127T290 -65T313 -9T321 21L315 17Q309 13 296 6T270 -6Q250 -11 231 -11Q185 -11 150 11T104 82Q103 89 103 113Q103 170 138 262T173 379Q173 380 173 381Q173 390 173 393T169 400T158 404H154Q131 404 112 385T82 344T65 302T57 280Q55 278 41 278H27Q21 284 21 287Z"></path><path id="MJX-67-TEX-I-1D467" d="M347 338Q337 338 294 349T231 360Q211 360 197 356T174 346T162 335T155 324L153 320Q150 317 138 317Q117 317 117 325Q117 330 120 339Q133 378 163 406T229 440Q241 442 246 442Q271 442 291 425T329 392T367 375Q389 375 411 408T434 441Q435 442 449 442H462Q468 436 468 434Q468 430 463 420T449 399T432 377T418 358L411 349Q368 298 275 214T160 106L148 94L163 93Q185 93 227 82T290 71Q328 71 360 90T402 140Q406 149 409 151T424 153Q443 153 443 143Q443 138 442 134Q425 72 376 31T278 -11Q252 -11 232 6T193 40T155 57Q111 57 76 -3Q70 -11 59 -11H54H41Q35 -5 35 -2Q35 13 93 84Q132 129 225 214T340 322Q352 338 347 338Z"></path><path id="MJX-67-TEX-N-2E" d="M78 60Q78 84 95 102T138 120Q162 120 180 104T199 61Q199 36 182 18T139 0T96 17T78 60Z"></path></defs><g stroke="currentColor" fill="currentColor" stroke-width="0" transform="scale(1,-1)"><g ><g ><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-67-TEX-I-1D465"></use></g><g transform="translate(605,413) scale(0.707)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-67-TEX-V-2032"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(1127.2,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-67-TEX-N-3D"></use></g><g transform="translate(2183,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-67-TEX-I-1D6FD"></use></g><g transform="translate(2749,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-67-TEX-N-28"></use></g><g transform="translate(3138,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-67-TEX-I-1D465"></use></g><g transform="translate(3932.2,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-67-TEX-N-2212"></use></g><g transform="translate(4932.5,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-67-TEX-I-1D709"></use></g><g transform="translate(5370.5,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-67-TEX-N-29"></use></g><g transform="translate(5759.5,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-67-TEX-N-2C"></use></g><g transform="translate(6037.5,0)"><g ></g></g><g transform="translate(7204.1,0)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-67-TEX-I-1D466"></use></g><g transform="translate(523,413) scale(0.707)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-67-TEX-V-2032"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(8249.4,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-67-TEX-N-3D"></use></g><g transform="translate(9305.1,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-67-TEX-I-1D466"></use></g><g transform="translate(9795.1,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-67-TEX-N-2C"></use></g><g transform="translate(10073.1,0)"><g ></g></g><g transform="translate(11239.8,0)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-67-TEX-I-1D467"></use></g><g transform="translate(498,413) scale(0.707)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-67-TEX-V-2032"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(12260,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-67-TEX-N-3D"></use></g><g transform="translate(13315.8,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-67-TEX-I-1D467"></use></g><g transform="translate(13780.8,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-67-TEX-N-2E"></use></g></g></g></svg>
\ No newline at end of file diff --git a/77011-h/images/16.svg b/77011-h/images/16.svg new file mode 100644 index 0000000..82f0d98 --- /dev/null +++ b/77011-h/images/16.svg @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +<svg version="1.1" style="vertical-align: -0.464ex;" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="2895.6px" height="909px" viewBox="0 -704 2895.6 909" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><defs><path id="MJX-68-TEX-I-1D709" d="M268 632Q268 704 296 704Q314 704 314 687Q314 682 311 664T308 635T309 620V616H315Q342 619 360 619Q443 619 443 586Q439 548 358 546H344Q326 546 317 549T290 566Q257 550 226 505T195 405Q195 381 201 364T211 342T218 337Q266 347 298 347Q375 347 375 314Q374 297 359 288T327 277T280 275Q234 275 208 283L195 286Q149 260 119 214T88 130Q88 116 90 108Q101 79 129 63T229 20Q238 17 243 15Q337 -21 354 -33Q383 -53 383 -94Q383 -137 351 -171T273 -205Q240 -205 202 -190T158 -167Q156 -163 156 -159Q156 -151 161 -146T176 -140Q182 -140 189 -143Q232 -168 274 -168Q286 -168 292 -165Q313 -151 313 -129Q313 -112 301 -104T232 -75Q214 -68 204 -64Q198 -62 171 -52T136 -38T107 -24T78 -8T56 12T36 37T26 66T21 103Q21 149 55 206T145 301L154 307L148 313Q141 319 136 323T124 338T111 358T103 382T99 413Q99 471 143 524T259 602L271 607Q268 618 268 632Z"></path><path id="MJX-68-TEX-N-3D" d="M56 347Q56 360 70 367H707Q722 359 722 347Q722 336 708 328L390 327H72Q56 332 56 347ZM56 153Q56 168 72 173H708Q722 163 722 153Q722 140 707 133H70Q56 140 56 153Z"></path><path id="MJX-68-TEX-I-1D463" d="M173 380Q173 405 154 405Q130 405 104 376T61 287Q60 286 59 284T58 281T56 279T53 278T49 278T41 278H27Q21 284 21 287Q21 294 29 316T53 368T97 419T160 441Q202 441 225 417T249 361Q249 344 246 335Q246 329 231 291T200 202T182 113Q182 86 187 69Q200 26 250 26Q287 26 319 60T369 139T398 222T409 277Q409 300 401 317T383 343T365 361T357 383Q357 405 376 424T417 443Q436 443 451 425T467 367Q467 340 455 284T418 159T347 40T241 -11Q177 -11 139 22Q102 54 102 117Q102 148 110 181T151 298Q173 362 173 380Z"></path><path id="MJX-68-TEX-I-1D461" d="M26 385Q19 392 19 395Q19 399 22 411T27 425Q29 430 36 430T87 431H140L159 511Q162 522 166 540T173 566T179 586T187 603T197 615T211 624T229 626Q247 625 254 615T261 596Q261 589 252 549T232 470L222 433Q222 431 272 431H323Q330 424 330 420Q330 398 317 385H210L174 240Q135 80 135 68Q135 26 162 26Q197 26 230 60T283 144Q285 150 288 151T303 153H307Q322 153 322 145Q322 142 319 133Q314 117 301 95T267 48T216 6T155 -11Q125 -11 98 4T59 56Q57 64 57 83V101L92 241Q127 382 128 383Q128 385 77 385H26Z"></path><path id="MJX-68-TEX-N-2C" d="M78 35T78 60T94 103T137 121Q165 121 187 96T210 8Q210 -27 201 -60T180 -117T154 -158T130 -185T117 -194Q113 -194 104 -185T95 -172Q95 -168 106 -156T131 -126T157 -76T173 -3V9L172 8Q170 7 167 6T161 3T152 1T140 0Q113 0 96 17Z"></path></defs><g stroke="currentColor" fill="currentColor" stroke-width="0" transform="scale(1,-1)"><g ><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-68-TEX-I-1D709"></use></g><g transform="translate(715.8,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-68-TEX-N-3D"></use></g><g transform="translate(1771.6,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-68-TEX-I-1D463"></use></g><g transform="translate(2256.6,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-68-TEX-I-1D461"></use></g><g transform="translate(2617.6,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-68-TEX-N-2C"></use></g></g></g></svg>
\ No newline at end of file diff --git a/77011-h/images/17.svg b/77011-h/images/17.svg new file mode 100644 index 0000000..31a384a --- /dev/null +++ b/77011-h/images/17.svg @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +<svg version="1.1" style="vertical-align: -0.566ex;" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="14466.8px" height="1059px" viewBox="0 -809 14466.8 1059" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><defs><path id="MJX-69-TEX-I-1D465" d="M52 289Q59 331 106 386T222 442Q257 442 286 424T329 379Q371 442 430 442Q467 442 494 420T522 361Q522 332 508 314T481 292T458 288Q439 288 427 299T415 328Q415 374 465 391Q454 404 425 404Q412 404 406 402Q368 386 350 336Q290 115 290 78Q290 50 306 38T341 26Q378 26 414 59T463 140Q466 150 469 151T485 153H489Q504 153 504 145Q504 144 502 134Q486 77 440 33T333 -11Q263 -11 227 52Q186 -10 133 -10H127Q78 -10 57 16T35 71Q35 103 54 123T99 143Q142 143 142 101Q142 81 130 66T107 46T94 41L91 40Q91 39 97 36T113 29T132 26Q168 26 194 71Q203 87 217 139T245 247T261 313Q266 340 266 352Q266 380 251 392T217 404Q177 404 142 372T93 290Q91 281 88 280T72 278H58Q52 284 52 289Z"></path><path id="MJX-69-TEX-V-2032" d="M79 43Q73 43 52 49T30 61Q30 68 85 293T146 528Q161 560 198 560Q218 560 240 545T262 501Q262 496 260 486Q259 479 173 263T84 45T79 43Z"></path><path id="MJX-69-TEX-N-3D" d="M56 347Q56 360 70 367H707Q722 359 722 347Q722 336 708 328L390 327H72Q56 332 56 347ZM56 153Q56 168 72 173H708Q722 163 722 153Q722 140 707 133H70Q56 140 56 153Z"></path><path id="MJX-69-TEX-I-1D6FD" d="M29 -194Q23 -188 23 -186Q23 -183 102 134T186 465Q208 533 243 584T309 658Q365 705 429 705H431Q493 705 533 667T573 570Q573 465 469 396L482 383Q533 332 533 252Q533 139 448 65T257 -10Q227 -10 203 -2T165 17T143 40T131 59T126 65L62 -188Q60 -194 42 -194H29ZM353 431Q392 431 427 419L432 422Q436 426 439 429T449 439T461 453T472 471T484 495T493 524T501 560Q503 569 503 593Q503 611 502 616Q487 667 426 667Q384 667 347 643T286 582T247 514T224 455Q219 439 186 308T152 168Q151 163 151 147Q151 99 173 68Q204 26 260 26Q302 26 349 51T425 137Q441 171 449 214T457 279Q457 337 422 372Q380 358 347 358H337Q258 358 258 389Q258 396 261 403Q275 431 353 431Z"></path><path id="MJX-69-TEX-N-28" d="M94 250Q94 319 104 381T127 488T164 576T202 643T244 695T277 729T302 750H315H319Q333 750 333 741Q333 738 316 720T275 667T226 581T184 443T167 250T184 58T225 -81T274 -167T316 -220T333 -241Q333 -250 318 -250H315H302L274 -226Q180 -141 137 -14T94 250Z"></path><path id="MJX-69-TEX-N-2212" d="M84 237T84 250T98 270H679Q694 262 694 250T679 230H98Q84 237 84 250Z"></path><path id="MJX-69-TEX-I-1D463" d="M173 380Q173 405 154 405Q130 405 104 376T61 287Q60 286 59 284T58 281T56 279T53 278T49 278T41 278H27Q21 284 21 287Q21 294 29 316T53 368T97 419T160 441Q202 441 225 417T249 361Q249 344 246 335Q246 329 231 291T200 202T182 113Q182 86 187 69Q200 26 250 26Q287 26 319 60T369 139T398 222T409 277Q409 300 401 317T383 343T365 361T357 383Q357 405 376 424T417 443Q436 443 451 425T467 367Q467 340 455 284T418 159T347 40T241 -11Q177 -11 139 22Q102 54 102 117Q102 148 110 181T151 298Q173 362 173 380Z"></path><path id="MJX-69-TEX-I-1D461" d="M26 385Q19 392 19 395Q19 399 22 411T27 425Q29 430 36 430T87 431H140L159 511Q162 522 166 540T173 566T179 586T187 603T197 615T211 624T229 626Q247 625 254 615T261 596Q261 589 252 549T232 470L222 433Q222 431 272 431H323Q330 424 330 420Q330 398 317 385H210L174 240Q135 80 135 68Q135 26 162 26Q197 26 230 60T283 144Q285 150 288 151T303 153H307Q322 153 322 145Q322 142 319 133Q314 117 301 95T267 48T216 6T155 -11Q125 -11 98 4T59 56Q57 64 57 83V101L92 241Q127 382 128 383Q128 385 77 385H26Z"></path><path id="MJX-69-TEX-N-29" d="M60 749L64 750Q69 750 74 750H86L114 726Q208 641 251 514T294 250Q294 182 284 119T261 12T224 -76T186 -143T145 -194T113 -227T90 -246Q87 -249 86 -250H74Q66 -250 63 -250T58 -247T55 -238Q56 -237 66 -225Q221 -64 221 250T66 725Q56 737 55 738Q55 746 60 749Z"></path><path id="MJX-69-TEX-N-2C" d="M78 35T78 60T94 103T137 121Q165 121 187 96T210 8Q210 -27 201 -60T180 -117T154 -158T130 -185T117 -194Q113 -194 104 -185T95 -172Q95 -168 106 -156T131 -126T157 -76T173 -3V9L172 8Q170 7 167 6T161 3T152 1T140 0Q113 0 96 17Z"></path><path id="MJX-69-TEX-I-1D466" d="M21 287Q21 301 36 335T84 406T158 442Q199 442 224 419T250 355Q248 336 247 334Q247 331 231 288T198 191T182 105Q182 62 196 45T238 27Q261 27 281 38T312 61T339 94Q339 95 344 114T358 173T377 247Q415 397 419 404Q432 431 462 431Q475 431 483 424T494 412T496 403Q496 390 447 193T391 -23Q363 -106 294 -155T156 -205Q111 -205 77 -183T43 -117Q43 -95 50 -80T69 -58T89 -48T106 -45Q150 -45 150 -87Q150 -107 138 -122T115 -142T102 -147L99 -148Q101 -153 118 -160T152 -167H160Q177 -167 186 -165Q219 -156 247 -127T290 -65T313 -9T321 21L315 17Q309 13 296 6T270 -6Q250 -11 231 -11Q185 -11 150 11T104 82Q103 89 103 113Q103 170 138 262T173 379Q173 380 173 381Q173 390 173 393T169 400T158 404H154Q131 404 112 385T82 344T65 302T57 280Q55 278 41 278H27Q21 284 21 287Z"></path><path id="MJX-69-TEX-I-1D467" d="M347 338Q337 338 294 349T231 360Q211 360 197 356T174 346T162 335T155 324L153 320Q150 317 138 317Q117 317 117 325Q117 330 120 339Q133 378 163 406T229 440Q241 442 246 442Q271 442 291 425T329 392T367 375Q389 375 411 408T434 441Q435 442 449 442H462Q468 436 468 434Q468 430 463 420T449 399T432 377T418 358L411 349Q368 298 275 214T160 106L148 94L163 93Q185 93 227 82T290 71Q328 71 360 90T402 140Q406 149 409 151T424 153Q443 153 443 143Q443 138 442 134Q425 72 376 31T278 -11Q252 -11 232 6T193 40T155 57Q111 57 76 -3Q70 -11 59 -11H54H41Q35 -5 35 -2Q35 13 93 84Q132 129 225 214T340 322Q352 338 347 338Z"></path><path id="MJX-69-TEX-N-2E" d="M78 60Q78 84 95 102T138 120Q162 120 180 104T199 61Q199 36 182 18T139 0T96 17T78 60Z"></path></defs><g stroke="currentColor" fill="currentColor" stroke-width="0" transform="scale(1,-1)"><g ><g ><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-69-TEX-I-1D465"></use></g><g transform="translate(605,413) scale(0.707)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-69-TEX-V-2032"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(1127.2,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-69-TEX-N-3D"></use></g><g transform="translate(2183,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-69-TEX-I-1D6FD"></use></g><g transform="translate(2749,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-69-TEX-N-28"></use></g><g transform="translate(3138,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-69-TEX-I-1D465"></use></g><g transform="translate(3932.2,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-69-TEX-N-2212"></use></g><g transform="translate(4932.5,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-69-TEX-I-1D463"></use></g><g transform="translate(5417.5,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-69-TEX-I-1D461"></use></g><g transform="translate(5778.5,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-69-TEX-N-29"></use></g><g transform="translate(6167.5,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-69-TEX-N-2C"></use></g><g transform="translate(6445.5,0)"><g ></g></g><g transform="translate(7612.1,0)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-69-TEX-I-1D466"></use></g><g transform="translate(523,413) scale(0.707)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-69-TEX-V-2032"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(8657.4,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-69-TEX-N-3D"></use></g><g transform="translate(9713.1,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-69-TEX-I-1D466"></use></g><g transform="translate(10203.1,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-69-TEX-N-2C"></use></g><g transform="translate(10481.1,0)"><g ></g></g><g transform="translate(11647.8,0)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-69-TEX-I-1D467"></use></g><g transform="translate(498,413) scale(0.707)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-69-TEX-V-2032"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(12668,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-69-TEX-N-3D"></use></g><g transform="translate(13723.8,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-69-TEX-I-1D467"></use></g><g transform="translate(14188.8,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-69-TEX-N-2E"></use></g></g></g></svg>
\ No newline at end of file diff --git a/77011-h/images/18.svg b/77011-h/images/18.svg new file mode 100644 index 0000000..a658de6 --- /dev/null +++ b/77011-h/images/18.svg @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +<svg version="1.1" style="vertical-align: -0.566ex;" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="6883.6px" height="1000px" viewBox="0 -750 6883.6 1000" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><defs><path id="MJX-70-TEX-N-54" d="M36 443Q37 448 46 558T55 671V677H666V671Q667 666 676 556T685 443V437H645V443Q645 445 642 478T631 544T610 593Q593 614 555 625Q534 630 478 630H451H443Q417 630 414 618Q413 616 413 339V63Q420 53 439 50T528 46H558V0H545L361 3Q186 1 177 0H164V46H194Q264 46 283 49T309 63V339V550Q309 620 304 625T271 630H244H224Q154 630 119 601Q101 585 93 554T81 486T76 443V437H36V443Z"></path><path id="MJX-70-TEX-N-3D" d="M56 347Q56 360 70 367H707Q722 359 722 347Q722 336 708 328L390 327H72Q56 332 56 347ZM56 153Q56 168 72 173H708Q722 163 722 153Q722 140 707 133H70Q56 140 56 153Z"></path><path id="MJX-70-TEX-I-1D453" d="M118 -162Q120 -162 124 -164T135 -167T147 -168Q160 -168 171 -155T187 -126Q197 -99 221 27T267 267T289 382V385H242Q195 385 192 387Q188 390 188 397L195 425Q197 430 203 430T250 431Q298 431 298 432Q298 434 307 482T319 540Q356 705 465 705Q502 703 526 683T550 630Q550 594 529 578T487 561Q443 561 443 603Q443 622 454 636T478 657L487 662Q471 668 457 668Q445 668 434 658T419 630Q412 601 403 552T387 469T380 433Q380 431 435 431Q480 431 487 430T498 424Q499 420 496 407T491 391Q489 386 482 386T428 385H372L349 263Q301 15 282 -47Q255 -132 212 -173Q175 -205 139 -205Q107 -205 81 -186T55 -132Q55 -95 76 -78T118 -61Q162 -61 162 -103Q162 -122 151 -136T127 -157L118 -162Z"></path><path id="MJX-70-TEX-N-28" d="M94 250Q94 319 104 381T127 488T164 576T202 643T244 695T277 729T302 750H315H319Q333 750 333 741Q333 738 316 720T275 667T226 581T184 443T167 250T184 58T225 -81T274 -167T316 -220T333 -241Q333 -250 318 -250H315H302L274 -226Q180 -141 137 -14T94 250Z"></path><path id="MJX-70-TEX-I-1D465" d="M52 289Q59 331 106 386T222 442Q257 442 286 424T329 379Q371 442 430 442Q467 442 494 420T522 361Q522 332 508 314T481 292T458 288Q439 288 427 299T415 328Q415 374 465 391Q454 404 425 404Q412 404 406 402Q368 386 350 336Q290 115 290 78Q290 50 306 38T341 26Q378 26 414 59T463 140Q466 150 469 151T485 153H489Q504 153 504 145Q504 144 502 134Q486 77 440 33T333 -11Q263 -11 227 52Q186 -10 133 -10H127Q78 -10 57 16T35 71Q35 103 54 123T99 143Q142 143 142 101Q142 81 130 66T107 46T94 41L91 40Q91 39 97 36T113 29T132 26Q168 26 194 71Q203 87 217 139T245 247T261 313Q266 340 266 352Q266 380 251 392T217 404Q177 404 142 372T93 290Q91 281 88 280T72 278H58Q52 284 52 289Z"></path><path id="MJX-70-TEX-N-2C" d="M78 35T78 60T94 103T137 121Q165 121 187 96T210 8Q210 -27 201 -60T180 -117T154 -158T130 -185T117 -194Q113 -194 104 -185T95 -172Q95 -168 106 -156T131 -126T157 -76T173 -3V9L172 8Q170 7 167 6T161 3T152 1T140 0Q113 0 96 17Z"></path><path id="MJX-70-TEX-I-1D466" d="M21 287Q21 301 36 335T84 406T158 442Q199 442 224 419T250 355Q248 336 247 334Q247 331 231 288T198 191T182 105Q182 62 196 45T238 27Q261 27 281 38T312 61T339 94Q339 95 344 114T358 173T377 247Q415 397 419 404Q432 431 462 431Q475 431 483 424T494 412T496 403Q496 390 447 193T391 -23Q363 -106 294 -155T156 -205Q111 -205 77 -183T43 -117Q43 -95 50 -80T69 -58T89 -48T106 -45Q150 -45 150 -87Q150 -107 138 -122T115 -142T102 -147L99 -148Q101 -153 118 -160T152 -167H160Q177 -167 186 -165Q219 -156 247 -127T290 -65T313 -9T321 21L315 17Q309 13 296 6T270 -6Q250 -11 231 -11Q185 -11 150 11T104 82Q103 89 103 113Q103 170 138 262T173 379Q173 380 173 381Q173 390 173 393T169 400T158 404H154Q131 404 112 385T82 344T65 302T57 280Q55 278 41 278H27Q21 284 21 287Z"></path><path id="MJX-70-TEX-I-1D467" d="M347 338Q337 338 294 349T231 360Q211 360 197 356T174 346T162 335T155 324L153 320Q150 317 138 317Q117 317 117 325Q117 330 120 339Q133 378 163 406T229 440Q241 442 246 442Q271 442 291 425T329 392T367 375Q389 375 411 408T434 441Q435 442 449 442H462Q468 436 468 434Q468 430 463 420T449 399T432 377T418 358L411 349Q368 298 275 214T160 106L148 94L163 93Q185 93 227 82T290 71Q328 71 360 90T402 140Q406 149 409 151T424 153Q443 153 443 143Q443 138 442 134Q425 72 376 31T278 -11Q252 -11 232 6T193 40T155 57Q111 57 76 -3Q70 -11 59 -11H54H41Q35 -5 35 -2Q35 13 93 84Q132 129 225 214T340 322Q352 338 347 338Z"></path><path id="MJX-70-TEX-I-1D461" d="M26 385Q19 392 19 395Q19 399 22 411T27 425Q29 430 36 430T87 431H140L159 511Q162 522 166 540T173 566T179 586T187 603T197 615T211 624T229 626Q247 625 254 615T261 596Q261 589 252 549T232 470L222 433Q222 431 272 431H323Q330 424 330 420Q330 398 317 385H210L174 240Q135 80 135 68Q135 26 162 26Q197 26 230 60T283 144Q285 150 288 151T303 153H307Q322 153 322 145Q322 142 319 133Q314 117 301 95T267 48T216 6T155 -11Q125 -11 98 4T59 56Q57 64 57 83V101L92 241Q127 382 128 383Q128 385 77 385H26Z"></path><path id="MJX-70-TEX-N-29" d="M60 749L64 750Q69 750 74 750H86L114 726Q208 641 251 514T294 250Q294 182 284 119T261 12T224 -76T186 -143T145 -194T113 -227T90 -246Q87 -249 86 -250H74Q66 -250 63 -250T58 -247T55 -238Q56 -237 66 -225Q221 -64 221 250T66 725Q56 737 55 738Q55 746 60 749Z"></path><path id="MJX-70-TEX-N-2E" d="M78 60Q78 84 95 102T138 120Q162 120 180 104T199 61Q199 36 182 18T139 0T96 17T78 60Z"></path></defs><g stroke="currentColor" fill="currentColor" stroke-width="0" transform="scale(1,-1)"><g ><g ><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-70-TEX-N-54"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(999.8,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-70-TEX-N-3D"></use></g><g transform="translate(2055.6,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-70-TEX-I-1D453"></use></g><g transform="translate(2605.6,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-70-TEX-N-28"></use></g><g transform="translate(2994.6,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-70-TEX-I-1D465"></use></g><g transform="translate(3566.6,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-70-TEX-N-2C"></use></g><g transform="translate(4011.2,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-70-TEX-I-1D466"></use></g><g transform="translate(4501.2,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-70-TEX-N-2C"></use></g><g transform="translate(4945.9,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-70-TEX-I-1D467"></use></g><g transform="translate(5410.9,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-70-TEX-N-2C"></use></g><g transform="translate(5855.6,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-70-TEX-I-1D461"></use></g><g transform="translate(6216.6,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-70-TEX-N-29"></use></g><g transform="translate(6605.6,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-70-TEX-N-2E"></use></g></g></g></svg>
\ No newline at end of file diff --git a/77011-h/images/19.svg b/77011-h/images/19.svg new file mode 100644 index 0000000..7e88f5d --- /dev/null +++ b/77011-h/images/19.svg @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +<svg version="1.1" style="vertical-align: -2.016ex;" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="19121.2px" height="2284px" viewBox="0 -1393 19121.2 2284" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><defs><path id="MJX-71-TEX-N-50" d="M130 622Q123 629 119 631T103 634T60 637H27V683H214Q237 683 276 683T331 684Q419 684 471 671T567 616Q624 563 624 489Q624 421 573 372T451 307Q429 302 328 301H234V181Q234 62 237 58Q245 47 304 46H337V0H326Q305 3 182 3Q47 3 38 0H27V46H60Q102 47 111 49T130 61V622ZM507 488Q507 514 506 528T500 564T483 597T450 620T397 635Q385 637 307 637H286Q237 637 234 628Q231 624 231 483V342H302H339Q390 342 423 349T481 382Q507 411 507 488Z"></path><path id="MJX-71-TEX-N-3D" d="M56 347Q56 360 70 367H707Q722 359 722 347Q722 336 708 328L390 327H72Q56 332 56 347ZM56 153Q56 168 72 173H708Q722 163 722 153Q722 140 707 133H70Q56 140 56 153Z"></path><path id="MJX-71-TEX-I-1D6FF" d="M195 609Q195 656 227 686T302 717Q319 716 351 709T407 697T433 690Q451 682 451 662Q451 644 438 628T403 612Q382 612 348 641T288 671T249 657T235 628Q235 584 334 463Q401 379 401 292Q401 169 340 80T205 -10H198Q127 -10 83 36T36 153Q36 286 151 382Q191 413 252 434Q252 435 245 449T230 481T214 521T201 566T195 609ZM112 130Q112 83 136 55T204 27Q233 27 256 51T291 111T309 178T316 232Q316 267 309 298T295 344T269 400L259 396Q215 381 183 342T137 256T118 179T112 130Z"></path><path id="MJX-71-TEX-N-54" d="M36 443Q37 448 46 558T55 671V677H666V671Q667 666 676 556T685 443V437H645V443Q645 445 642 478T631 544T610 593Q593 614 555 625Q534 630 478 630H451H443Q417 630 414 618Q413 616 413 339V63Q420 53 439 50T528 46H558V0H545L361 3Q186 1 177 0H164V46H194Q264 46 283 49T309 63V339V550Q309 620 304 625T271 630H244H224Q154 630 119 601Q101 585 93 554T81 486T76 443V437H36V443Z"></path><path id="MJX-71-TEX-I-1D465" d="M52 289Q59 331 106 386T222 442Q257 442 286 424T329 379Q371 442 430 442Q467 442 494 420T522 361Q522 332 508 314T481 292T458 288Q439 288 427 299T415 328Q415 374 465 391Q454 404 425 404Q412 404 406 402Q368 386 350 336Q290 115 290 78Q290 50 306 38T341 26Q378 26 414 59T463 140Q466 150 469 151T485 153H489Q504 153 504 145Q504 144 502 134Q486 77 440 33T333 -11Q263 -11 227 52Q186 -10 133 -10H127Q78 -10 57 16T35 71Q35 103 54 123T99 143Q142 143 142 101Q142 81 130 66T107 46T94 41L91 40Q91 39 97 36T113 29T132 26Q168 26 194 71Q203 87 217 139T245 247T261 313Q266 340 266 352Q266 380 251 392T217 404Q177 404 142 372T93 290Q91 281 88 280T72 278H58Q52 284 52 289Z"></path><path id="MJX-71-TEX-N-2C" d="M78 35T78 60T94 103T137 121Q165 121 187 96T210 8Q210 -27 201 -60T180 -117T154 -158T130 -185T117 -194Q113 -194 104 -185T95 -172Q95 -168 106 -156T131 -126T157 -76T173 -3V9L172 8Q170 7 167 6T161 3T152 1T140 0Q113 0 96 17Z"></path><path id="MJX-71-TEX-N-51" d="M56 341Q56 499 157 602T388 705Q521 705 621 601T722 341Q722 275 703 218T660 127T603 63T555 25T525 9Q524 8 524 8H523Q524 5 526 -1T537 -21T555 -47T581 -67T615 -76Q653 -76 678 -56T706 -3Q707 10 716 10Q721 10 728 5L727 -13Q727 -88 697 -140T606 -193Q563 -193 538 -166T498 -83Q483 -23 483 -8L471 -11Q459 -14 435 -18T388 -22Q254 -22 155 81T56 341ZM607 339Q607 429 586 496T531 598T461 649T390 665T318 649T248 598T192 496T170 339Q170 143 277 57Q301 39 305 39L304 42Q304 44 304 46Q301 53 301 68Q301 101 325 128T391 155Q454 155 495 70L501 58Q549 91 578 164Q607 234 607 339ZM385 18Q404 18 425 23T459 33T472 40Q471 47 468 57T449 88T412 115Q398 117 386 117Q367 117 353 102T338 67Q338 48 351 33T385 18Z"></path><path id="MJX-71-TEX-I-1D466" d="M21 287Q21 301 36 335T84 406T158 442Q199 442 224 419T250 355Q248 336 247 334Q247 331 231 288T198 191T182 105Q182 62 196 45T238 27Q261 27 281 38T312 61T339 94Q339 95 344 114T358 173T377 247Q415 397 419 404Q432 431 462 431Q475 431 483 424T494 412T496 403Q496 390 447 193T391 -23Q363 -106 294 -155T156 -205Q111 -205 77 -183T43 -117Q43 -95 50 -80T69 -58T89 -48T106 -45Q150 -45 150 -87Q150 -107 138 -122T115 -142T102 -147L99 -148Q101 -153 118 -160T152 -167H160Q177 -167 186 -165Q219 -156 247 -127T290 -65T313 -9T321 21L315 17Q309 13 296 6T270 -6Q250 -11 231 -11Q185 -11 150 11T104 82Q103 89 103 113Q103 170 138 262T173 379Q173 380 173 381Q173 390 173 393T169 400T158 404H154Q131 404 112 385T82 344T65 302T57 280Q55 278 41 278H27Q21 284 21 287Z"></path><path id="MJX-71-TEX-N-52" d="M130 622Q123 629 119 631T103 634T60 637H27V683H202H236H300Q376 683 417 677T500 648Q595 600 609 517Q610 512 610 501Q610 468 594 439T556 392T511 361T472 343L456 338Q459 335 467 332Q497 316 516 298T545 254T559 211T568 155T578 94Q588 46 602 31T640 16H645Q660 16 674 32T692 87Q692 98 696 101T712 105T728 103T732 90Q732 59 716 27T672 -16Q656 -22 630 -22Q481 -16 458 90Q456 101 456 163T449 246Q430 304 373 320L363 322L297 323H231V192L232 61Q238 51 249 49T301 46H334V0H323Q302 3 181 3Q59 3 38 0H27V46H60Q102 47 111 49T130 61V622ZM491 499V509Q491 527 490 539T481 570T462 601T424 623T362 636Q360 636 340 636T304 637H283Q238 637 234 628Q231 624 231 492V360H289Q390 360 434 378T489 456Q491 467 491 499Z"></path><path id="MJX-71-TEX-I-1D467" d="M347 338Q337 338 294 349T231 360Q211 360 197 356T174 346T162 335T155 324L153 320Q150 317 138 317Q117 317 117 325Q117 330 120 339Q133 378 163 406T229 440Q241 442 246 442Q271 442 291 425T329 392T367 375Q389 375 411 408T434 441Q435 442 449 442H462Q468 436 468 434Q468 430 463 420T449 399T432 377T418 358L411 349Q368 298 275 214T160 106L148 94L163 93Q185 93 227 82T290 71Q328 71 360 90T402 140Q406 149 409 151T424 153Q443 153 443 143Q443 138 442 134Q425 72 376 31T278 -11Q252 -11 232 6T193 40T155 57Q111 57 76 -3Q70 -11 59 -11H54H41Q35 -5 35 -2Q35 13 93 84Q132 129 225 214T340 322Q352 338 347 338Z"></path><path id="MJX-71-TEX-N-53" d="M55 507Q55 590 112 647T243 704H257Q342 704 405 641L426 672Q431 679 436 687T446 700L449 704Q450 704 453 704T459 705H463Q466 705 472 699V462L466 456H448Q437 456 435 459T430 479Q413 605 329 646Q292 662 254 662Q201 662 168 626T135 542Q135 508 152 480T200 435Q210 431 286 412T370 389Q427 367 463 314T500 191Q500 110 448 45T301 -21Q245 -21 201 -4T140 27L122 41Q118 36 107 21T87 -7T78 -21Q76 -22 68 -22H64Q61 -22 55 -16V101Q55 220 56 222Q58 227 76 227H89Q95 221 95 214Q95 182 105 151T139 90T205 42T305 24Q352 24 386 62T420 155Q420 198 398 233T340 281Q284 295 266 300Q261 301 239 306T206 314T174 325T141 343T112 367T85 402Q55 451 55 507Z"></path><path id="MJX-71-TEX-I-1D461" d="M26 385Q19 392 19 395Q19 399 22 411T27 425Q29 430 36 430T87 431H140L159 511Q162 522 166 540T173 566T179 586T187 603T197 615T211 624T229 626Q247 625 254 615T261 596Q261 589 252 549T232 470L222 433Q222 431 272 431H323Q330 424 330 420Q330 398 317 385H210L174 240Q135 80 135 68Q135 26 162 26Q197 26 230 60T283 144Q285 150 288 151T303 153H307Q322 153 322 145Q322 142 319 133Q314 117 301 95T267 48T216 6T155 -11Q125 -11 98 4T59 56Q57 64 57 83V101L92 241Q127 382 128 383Q128 385 77 385H26Z"></path><path id="MJX-71-TEX-N-2E" d="M78 60Q78 84 95 102T138 120Q162 120 180 104T199 61Q199 36 182 18T139 0T96 17T78 60Z"></path></defs><g stroke="currentColor" fill="currentColor" stroke-width="0" transform="scale(1,-1)"><g ><g ><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-71-TEX-N-50"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(958.8,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-71-TEX-N-3D"></use></g><g transform="translate(2014.6,0)"><g ><g transform="translate(220,676)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-71-TEX-I-1D6FF"></use></g><g transform="translate(444,0)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-71-TEX-N-54"></use></g></g></g><g transform="translate(295,-686)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-71-TEX-I-1D6FF"></use></g><g transform="translate(444,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-71-TEX-I-1D465"></use></g></g><rect width="1366" height="60" x="120" y="220"></rect></g></g><g transform="translate(3620.6,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-71-TEX-N-2C"></use></g><g transform="translate(3898.6,0)"><g ></g></g><g transform="translate(5065.2,0)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-71-TEX-N-51"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(6121,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-71-TEX-N-3D"></use></g><g transform="translate(7176.8,0)"><g ><g transform="translate(220,676)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-71-TEX-I-1D6FF"></use></g><g transform="translate(444,0)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-71-TEX-N-54"></use></g></g></g><g transform="translate(336,-686)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-71-TEX-I-1D6FF"></use></g><g transform="translate(444,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-71-TEX-I-1D466"></use></g></g><rect width="1366" height="60" x="120" y="220"></rect></g></g><g transform="translate(8782.8,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-71-TEX-N-2C"></use></g><g transform="translate(9060.8,0)"><g ></g></g><g transform="translate(10227.4,0)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-71-TEX-N-52"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(11241.2,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-71-TEX-N-3D"></use></g><g transform="translate(12297,0)"><g ><g transform="translate(220,676)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-71-TEX-I-1D6FF"></use></g><g transform="translate(444,0)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-71-TEX-N-54"></use></g></g></g><g transform="translate(348.5,-686)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-71-TEX-I-1D6FF"></use></g><g transform="translate(444,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-71-TEX-I-1D467"></use></g></g><rect width="1366" height="60" x="120" y="220"></rect></g></g><g transform="translate(13903,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-71-TEX-N-2C"></use></g><g transform="translate(14181,0)"><g ></g></g><g transform="translate(15347.7,0)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-71-TEX-N-53"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(16181.4,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-71-TEX-N-3D"></use></g><g transform="translate(17237.2,0)"><g ><g transform="translate(220,676)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-71-TEX-I-1D6FF"></use></g><g transform="translate(444,0)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-71-TEX-N-54"></use></g></g></g><g transform="translate(400.5,-686)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-71-TEX-I-1D6FF"></use></g><g transform="translate(444,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-71-TEX-I-1D461"></use></g></g><rect width="1366" height="60" x="120" y="220"></rect></g></g><g transform="translate(18843.2,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-71-TEX-N-2E"></use></g></g></g></svg>
\ No newline at end of file diff --git a/77011-h/images/2.svg b/77011-h/images/2.svg new file mode 100644 index 0000000..2dac1f5 --- /dev/null +++ b/77011-h/images/2.svg @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +<svg version="1.1" style="vertical-align: -0.781ex;" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="16438.9px" height="1228.9px" viewBox="0 -883.9 16438.9 1228.9" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><defs><path id="MJX-2-TEX-I-1D463" d="M173 380Q173 405 154 405Q130 405 104 376T61 287Q60 286 59 284T58 281T56 279T53 278T49 278T41 278H27Q21 284 21 287Q21 294 29 316T53 368T97 419T160 441Q202 441 225 417T249 361Q249 344 246 335Q246 329 231 291T200 202T182 113Q182 86 187 69Q200 26 250 26Q287 26 319 60T369 139T398 222T409 277Q409 300 401 317T383 343T365 361T357 383Q357 405 376 424T417 443Q436 443 451 425T467 367Q467 340 455 284T418 159T347 40T241 -11Q177 -11 139 22Q102 54 102 117Q102 148 110 181T151 298Q173 362 173 380Z"></path><path id="MJX-2-TEX-N-32" d="M109 429Q82 429 66 447T50 491Q50 562 103 614T235 666Q326 666 387 610T449 465Q449 422 429 383T381 315T301 241Q265 210 201 149L142 93L218 92Q375 92 385 97Q392 99 409 186V189H449V186Q448 183 436 95T421 3V0H50V19V31Q50 38 56 46T86 81Q115 113 136 137Q145 147 170 174T204 211T233 244T261 278T284 308T305 340T320 369T333 401T340 431T343 464Q343 527 309 573T212 619Q179 619 154 602T119 569T109 550Q109 549 114 549Q132 549 151 535T170 489Q170 464 154 447T109 429Z"></path><path id="MJX-2-TEX-N-3D" d="M56 347Q56 360 70 367H707Q722 359 722 347Q722 336 708 328L390 327H72Q56 332 56 347ZM56 153Q56 168 72 173H708Q722 163 722 153Q722 140 707 133H70Q56 140 56 153Z"></path><path id="MJX-2-TEX-I-1D462" d="M21 287Q21 295 30 318T55 370T99 420T158 442Q204 442 227 417T250 358Q250 340 216 246T182 105Q182 62 196 45T238 27T291 44T328 78L339 95Q341 99 377 247Q407 367 413 387T427 416Q444 431 463 431Q480 431 488 421T496 402L420 84Q419 79 419 68Q419 43 426 35T447 26Q469 29 482 57T512 145Q514 153 532 153Q551 153 551 144Q550 139 549 130T540 98T523 55T498 17T462 -8Q454 -10 438 -10Q372 -10 347 46Q345 45 336 36T318 21T296 6T267 -6T233 -11Q189 -11 155 7Q103 38 103 113Q103 170 138 262T173 379Q173 380 173 381Q173 390 173 393T169 400T158 404H154Q131 404 112 385T82 344T65 302T57 280Q55 278 41 278H27Q21 284 21 287Z"></path><path id="MJX-2-TEX-N-2B" d="M56 237T56 250T70 270H369V420L370 570Q380 583 389 583Q402 583 409 568V270H707Q722 262 722 250T707 230H409V-68Q401 -82 391 -82H389H387Q375 -82 369 -68V230H70Q56 237 56 250Z"></path><path id="MJX-2-TEX-I-1D453" d="M118 -162Q120 -162 124 -164T135 -167T147 -168Q160 -168 171 -155T187 -126Q197 -99 221 27T267 267T289 382V385H242Q195 385 192 387Q188 390 188 397L195 425Q197 430 203 430T250 431Q298 431 298 432Q298 434 307 482T319 540Q356 705 465 705Q502 703 526 683T550 630Q550 594 529 578T487 561Q443 561 443 603Q443 622 454 636T478 657L487 662Q471 668 457 668Q445 668 434 658T419 630Q412 601 403 552T387 469T380 433Q380 431 435 431Q480 431 487 430T498 424Q499 420 496 407T491 391Q489 386 482 386T428 385H372L349 263Q301 15 282 -47Q255 -132 212 -173Q175 -205 139 -205Q107 -205 81 -186T55 -132Q55 -95 76 -78T118 -61Q162 -61 162 -103Q162 -122 151 -136T127 -157L118 -162Z"></path><path id="MJX-2-TEX-I-1D460" d="M131 289Q131 321 147 354T203 415T300 442Q362 442 390 415T419 355Q419 323 402 308T364 292Q351 292 340 300T328 326Q328 342 337 354T354 372T367 378Q368 378 368 379Q368 382 361 388T336 399T297 405Q249 405 227 379T204 326Q204 301 223 291T278 274T330 259Q396 230 396 163Q396 135 385 107T352 51T289 7T195 -10Q118 -10 86 19T53 87Q53 126 74 143T118 160Q133 160 146 151T160 120Q160 94 142 76T111 58Q109 57 108 57T107 55Q108 52 115 47T146 34T201 27Q237 27 263 38T301 66T318 97T323 122Q323 150 302 164T254 181T195 196T148 231Q131 256 131 289Z"></path><path id="MJX-2-TEX-N-2C" d="M78 35T78 60T94 103T137 121Q165 121 187 96T210 8Q210 -27 201 -60T180 -117T154 -158T130 -185T117 -194Q113 -194 104 -185T95 -172Q95 -168 106 -156T131 -126T157 -76T173 -3V9L172 8Q170 7 167 6T161 3T152 1T140 0Q113 0 96 17Z"></path><path id="MJX-2-TEX-N-61" d="M137 305T115 305T78 320T63 359Q63 394 97 421T218 448Q291 448 336 416T396 340Q401 326 401 309T402 194V124Q402 76 407 58T428 40Q443 40 448 56T453 109V145H493V106Q492 66 490 59Q481 29 455 12T400 -6T353 12T329 54V58L327 55Q325 52 322 49T314 40T302 29T287 17T269 6T247 -2T221 -8T190 -11Q130 -11 82 20T34 107Q34 128 41 147T68 188T116 225T194 253T304 268H318V290Q318 324 312 340Q290 411 215 411Q197 411 181 410T156 406T148 403Q170 388 170 359Q170 334 154 320ZM126 106Q126 75 150 51T209 26Q247 26 276 49T315 109Q317 116 318 175Q318 233 317 233Q309 233 296 232T251 223T193 203T147 166T126 106Z"></path><path id="MJX-2-TEX-N-6E" d="M41 46H55Q94 46 102 60V68Q102 77 102 91T102 122T103 161T103 203Q103 234 103 269T102 328V351Q99 370 88 376T43 385H25V408Q25 431 27 431L37 432Q47 433 65 434T102 436Q119 437 138 438T167 441T178 442H181V402Q181 364 182 364T187 369T199 384T218 402T247 421T285 437Q305 442 336 442Q450 438 463 329Q464 322 464 190V104Q464 66 466 59T477 49Q498 46 526 46H542V0H534L510 1Q487 2 460 2T422 3Q319 3 310 0H302V46H318Q379 46 379 62Q380 64 380 200Q379 335 378 343Q372 371 358 385T334 402T308 404Q263 404 229 370Q202 343 195 315T187 232V168V108Q187 78 188 68T191 55T200 49Q221 46 249 46H265V0H257L234 1Q210 2 183 2T145 3Q42 3 33 0H25V46H41Z"></path><path id="MJX-2-TEX-N-64" d="M376 495Q376 511 376 535T377 568Q377 613 367 624T316 637H298V660Q298 683 300 683L310 684Q320 685 339 686T376 688Q393 689 413 690T443 693T454 694H457V390Q457 84 458 81Q461 61 472 55T517 46H535V0Q533 0 459 -5T380 -11H373V44L365 37Q307 -11 235 -11Q158 -11 96 50T34 215Q34 315 97 378T244 442Q319 442 376 393V495ZM373 342Q328 405 260 405Q211 405 173 369Q146 341 139 305T131 211Q131 155 138 120T173 59Q203 26 251 26Q322 26 373 103V342Z"></path><path id="MJX-2-TEX-I-1D461" d="M26 385Q19 392 19 395Q19 399 22 411T27 425Q29 430 36 430T87 431H140L159 511Q162 522 166 540T173 566T179 586T187 603T197 615T211 624T229 626Q247 625 254 615T261 596Q261 589 252 549T232 470L222 433Q222 431 272 431H323Q330 424 330 420Q330 398 317 385H210L174 240Q135 80 135 68Q135 26 162 26Q197 26 230 60T283 144Q285 150 288 151T303 153H307Q322 153 322 145Q322 142 319 133Q314 117 301 95T267 48T216 6T155 -11Q125 -11 98 4T59 56Q57 64 57 83V101L92 241Q127 382 128 383Q128 385 77 385H26Z"></path><path id="MJX-2-TEX-N-31" d="M213 578L200 573Q186 568 160 563T102 556H83V602H102Q149 604 189 617T245 641T273 663Q275 666 285 666Q294 666 302 660V361L303 61Q310 54 315 52T339 48T401 46H427V0H416Q395 3 257 3Q121 3 100 0H88V46H114Q136 46 152 46T177 47T193 50T201 52T207 57T213 61V578Z"></path><path id="MJX-2-TEX-N-2E" d="M78 60Q78 84 95 102T138 120Q162 120 180 104T199 61Q199 36 182 18T139 0T96 17T78 60Z"></path></defs><g stroke="currentColor" fill="currentColor" stroke-width="0" transform="scale(1,-1)"><g ><g ><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-2-TEX-I-1D463"></use></g><g transform="translate(518,413) scale(0.707)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-2-TEX-N-32"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(1199.3,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-2-TEX-N-3D"></use></g><g transform="translate(2255.1,0)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-2-TEX-I-1D462"></use></g><g transform="translate(605,413) scale(0.707)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-2-TEX-N-32"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(3485.9,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-2-TEX-N-2B"></use></g><g transform="translate(4486.1,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-2-TEX-N-32"></use></g><g transform="translate(4986.1,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-2-TEX-I-1D453"></use></g><g transform="translate(5536.1,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-2-TEX-I-1D460"></use></g><g transform="translate(6005.1,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-2-TEX-N-2C"></use></g><g transform="translate(6283.1,0)"><g ></g></g><g transform="translate(7449.8,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-2-TEX-N-61"></use><use xlink:href="#MJX-2-TEX-N-6E" transform="translate(500,0)"></use><use xlink:href="#MJX-2-TEX-N-64" transform="translate(1056,0)"></use></g><g transform="translate(9061.8,0)"><g ></g></g><g transform="translate(10061.8,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-2-TEX-I-1D460"></use></g><g transform="translate(10808.6,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-2-TEX-N-3D"></use></g><g transform="translate(11864.3,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-2-TEX-I-1D462"></use></g><g transform="translate(12436.3,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-2-TEX-I-1D461"></use></g><g transform="translate(13019.6,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-2-TEX-N-2B"></use></g><g transform="translate(14019.8,0)"><g ><g transform="translate(220,394) scale(0.707)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-2-TEX-N-31"></use></g><g transform="translate(220,-345) scale(0.707)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-2-TEX-N-32"></use></g><rect width="553.6" height="60" x="120" y="220"></rect></g></g><g transform="translate(14813.3,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-2-TEX-I-1D453"></use></g><g transform="translate(15363.3,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-2-TEX-I-1D461"></use></g><g transform="translate(15724.3,0)"><g ><g ></g><g transform="translate(33,413) scale(0.707)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-2-TEX-N-32"></use></g></g></g><g transform="translate(16160.9,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-2-TEX-N-2E"></use></g></g></g></svg>
\ No newline at end of file diff --git a/77011-h/images/20.svg b/77011-h/images/20.svg new file mode 100644 index 0000000..84b5e11 --- /dev/null +++ b/77011-h/images/20.svg @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +<svg version="1.1" style="vertical-align: -5.748ex;" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="10245.2px" height="5581.6px" viewBox="0 -3040.8 10245.2 5581.6" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><defs><path id="MJX-72-TEX-N-55" d="M128 622Q121 629 117 631T101 634T58 637H25V683H36Q57 680 180 680Q315 680 324 683H335V637H302Q262 636 251 634T233 622L232 418V291Q232 189 240 145T280 67Q325 24 389 24Q454 24 506 64T571 183Q575 206 575 410V598Q569 608 565 613T541 627T489 637H472V683H481Q496 680 598 680T715 683H724V637H707Q634 633 622 598L621 399Q620 194 617 180Q617 179 615 171Q595 83 531 31T389 -22Q304 -22 226 33T130 192Q129 201 128 412V622Z"></path><path id="MJX-72-TEX-N-31" d="M213 578L200 573Q186 568 160 563T102 556H83V602H102Q149 604 189 617T245 641T273 663Q275 666 285 666Q294 666 302 660V361L303 61Q310 54 315 52T339 48T401 46H427V0H416Q395 3 257 3Q121 3 100 0H88V46H114Q136 46 152 46T177 47T193 50T201 52T207 57T213 61V578Z"></path><path id="MJX-72-TEX-N-3D" d="M56 347Q56 360 70 367H707Q722 359 722 347Q722 336 708 328L390 327H72Q56 332 56 347ZM56 153Q56 168 72 173H708Q722 163 722 153Q722 140 707 133H70Q56 140 56 153Z"></path><path id="MJX-72-TEX-LO-7B" d="M547 -643L541 -649H528Q515 -649 503 -645Q324 -582 293 -466Q289 -449 289 -428T287 -200L286 42L284 53Q274 98 248 135T196 190T146 222L121 235Q119 239 119 250Q119 262 121 266T133 273Q262 336 284 449L286 460L287 701Q287 737 287 794Q288 949 292 963Q293 966 293 967Q325 1080 508 1148Q516 1150 527 1150H541L547 1144V1130Q547 1117 546 1115T536 1109Q480 1086 437 1046T381 950L379 940L378 699Q378 657 378 594Q377 452 374 438Q373 437 373 436Q350 348 243 282Q192 257 186 254L176 251L188 245Q211 236 234 223T287 189T340 135T373 65Q373 64 374 63Q377 49 378 -93Q378 -156 378 -198L379 -438L381 -449Q393 -504 436 -544T536 -608Q544 -611 545 -613T547 -629V-643Z"></path><path id="MJX-72-TEX-I-1D451" d="M366 683Q367 683 438 688T511 694Q523 694 523 686Q523 679 450 384T375 83T374 68Q374 26 402 26Q411 27 422 35Q443 55 463 131Q469 151 473 152Q475 153 483 153H487H491Q506 153 506 145Q506 140 503 129Q490 79 473 48T445 8T417 -8Q409 -10 393 -10Q359 -10 336 5T306 36L300 51Q299 52 296 50Q294 48 292 46Q233 -10 172 -10Q117 -10 75 30T33 157Q33 205 53 255T101 341Q148 398 195 420T280 442Q336 442 364 400Q369 394 369 396Q370 400 396 505T424 616Q424 629 417 632T378 637H357Q351 643 351 645T353 664Q358 683 366 683ZM352 326Q329 405 277 405Q242 405 210 374T160 293Q131 214 119 129Q119 126 119 118T118 106Q118 61 136 44T179 26Q233 26 290 98L298 109L352 326Z"></path><path id="MJX-72-TEX-I-1D6FD" d="M29 -194Q23 -188 23 -186Q23 -183 102 134T186 465Q208 533 243 584T309 658Q365 705 429 705H431Q493 705 533 667T573 570Q573 465 469 396L482 383Q533 332 533 252Q533 139 448 65T257 -10Q227 -10 203 -2T165 17T143 40T131 59T126 65L62 -188Q60 -194 42 -194H29ZM353 431Q392 431 427 419L432 422Q436 426 439 429T449 439T461 453T472 471T484 495T493 524T501 560Q503 569 503 593Q503 611 502 616Q487 667 426 667Q384 667 347 643T286 582T247 514T224 455Q219 439 186 308T152 168Q151 163 151 147Q151 99 173 68Q204 26 260 26Q302 26 349 51T425 137Q441 171 449 214T457 279Q457 337 422 372Q380 358 347 358H337Q258 358 258 389Q258 396 261 403Q275 431 353 431Z"></path><path id="MJX-72-TEX-I-1D461" d="M26 385Q19 392 19 395Q19 399 22 411T27 425Q29 430 36 430T87 431H140L159 511Q162 522 166 540T173 566T179 586T187 603T197 615T211 624T229 626Q247 625 254 615T261 596Q261 589 252 549T232 470L222 433Q222 431 272 431H323Q330 424 330 420Q330 398 317 385H210L174 240Q135 80 135 68Q135 26 162 26Q197 26 230 60T283 144Q285 150 288 151T303 153H307Q322 153 322 145Q322 142 319 133Q314 117 301 95T267 48T216 6T155 -11Q125 -11 98 4T59 56Q57 64 57 83V101L92 241Q127 382 128 383Q128 385 77 385H26Z"></path><path id="MJX-72-TEX-N-28" d="M94 250Q94 319 104 381T127 488T164 576T202 643T244 695T277 729T302 750H315H319Q333 750 333 741Q333 738 316 720T275 667T226 581T184 443T167 250T184 58T225 -81T274 -167T316 -220T333 -241Q333 -250 318 -250H315H302L274 -226Q180 -141 137 -14T94 250Z"></path><path id="MJX-72-TEX-I-1D465" d="M52 289Q59 331 106 386T222 442Q257 442 286 424T329 379Q371 442 430 442Q467 442 494 420T522 361Q522 332 508 314T481 292T458 288Q439 288 427 299T415 328Q415 374 465 391Q454 404 425 404Q412 404 406 402Q368 386 350 336Q290 115 290 78Q290 50 306 38T341 26Q378 26 414 59T463 140Q466 150 469 151T485 153H489Q504 153 504 145Q504 144 502 134Q486 77 440 33T333 -11Q263 -11 227 52Q186 -10 133 -10H127Q78 -10 57 16T35 71Q35 103 54 123T99 143Q142 143 142 101Q142 81 130 66T107 46T94 41L91 40Q91 39 97 36T113 29T132 26Q168 26 194 71Q203 87 217 139T245 247T261 313Q266 340 266 352Q266 380 251 392T217 404Q177 404 142 372T93 290Q91 281 88 280T72 278H58Q52 284 52 289Z"></path><path id="MJX-72-TEX-N-2212" d="M84 237T84 250T98 270H679Q694 262 694 250T679 230H98Q84 237 84 250Z"></path><path id="MJX-72-TEX-I-1D463" d="M173 380Q173 405 154 405Q130 405 104 376T61 287Q60 286 59 284T58 281T56 279T53 278T49 278T41 278H27Q21 284 21 287Q21 294 29 316T53 368T97 419T160 441Q202 441 225 417T249 361Q249 344 246 335Q246 329 231 291T200 202T182 113Q182 86 187 69Q200 26 250 26Q287 26 319 60T369 139T398 222T409 277Q409 300 401 317T383 343T365 361T357 383Q357 405 376 424T417 443Q436 443 451 425T467 367Q467 340 455 284T418 159T347 40T241 -11Q177 -11 139 22Q102 54 102 117Q102 148 110 181T151 298Q173 362 173 380Z"></path><path id="MJX-72-TEX-N-29" d="M60 749L64 750Q69 750 74 750H86L114 726Q208 641 251 514T294 250Q294 182 284 119T261 12T224 -76T186 -143T145 -194T113 -227T90 -246Q87 -249 86 -250H74Q66 -250 63 -250T58 -247T55 -238Q56 -237 66 -225Q221 -64 221 250T66 725Q56 737 55 738Q55 746 60 749Z"></path><path id="MJX-72-TEX-N-2B" d="M56 237T56 250T70 270H369V420L370 570Q380 583 389 583Q402 583 409 568V270H707Q722 262 722 250T707 230H409V-68Q401 -82 391 -82H389H387Q375 -82 369 -68V230H70Q56 237 56 250Z"></path><path id="MJX-72-TEX-I-1D462" d="M21 287Q21 295 30 318T55 370T99 420T158 442Q204 442 227 417T250 358Q250 340 216 246T182 105Q182 62 196 45T238 27T291 44T328 78L339 95Q341 99 377 247Q407 367 413 387T427 416Q444 431 463 431Q480 431 488 421T496 402L420 84Q419 79 419 68Q419 43 426 35T447 26Q469 29 482 57T512 145Q514 153 532 153Q551 153 551 144Q550 139 549 130T540 98T523 55T498 17T462 -8Q454 -10 438 -10Q372 -10 347 46Q345 45 336 36T318 21T296 6T267 -6T233 -11Q189 -11 155 7Q103 38 103 113Q103 170 138 262T173 379Q173 380 173 381Q173 390 173 393T169 400T158 404H154Q131 404 112 385T82 344T65 302T57 280Q55 278 41 278H27Q21 284 21 287Z"></path><path id="MJX-72-TEX-LO-7D" d="M119 1130Q119 1144 121 1147T135 1150H139Q151 1150 182 1138T252 1105T326 1046T373 964Q378 942 378 702Q378 469 379 462Q386 394 439 339Q482 296 535 272Q544 268 545 266T547 251Q547 241 547 238T542 231T531 227T510 217T477 194Q390 129 379 39Q378 32 378 -201Q378 -441 373 -463Q342 -580 165 -644Q152 -649 139 -649Q125 -649 122 -646T119 -629Q119 -622 119 -619T121 -614T124 -610T132 -607T143 -602Q195 -579 235 -539T285 -447Q286 -435 287 -199T289 51Q294 74 300 91T329 138T390 197Q412 213 436 226T475 244L489 250L472 258Q455 265 430 279T377 313T327 366T293 434Q289 451 289 472T287 699Q286 941 285 948Q279 978 262 1005T227 1048T184 1080T151 1100T129 1109L127 1110Q119 1113 119 1130Z"></path><path id="MJX-72-TEX-N-7B" d="M434 -231Q434 -244 428 -250H410Q281 -250 230 -184Q225 -177 222 -172T217 -161T213 -148T211 -133T210 -111T209 -84T209 -47T209 0Q209 21 209 53Q208 142 204 153Q203 154 203 155Q189 191 153 211T82 231Q71 231 68 234T65 250T68 266T82 269Q116 269 152 289T203 345Q208 356 208 377T209 529V579Q209 634 215 656T244 698Q270 724 324 740Q361 748 377 749Q379 749 390 749T408 750H428Q434 744 434 732Q434 719 431 716Q429 713 415 713Q362 710 332 689T296 647Q291 634 291 499V417Q291 370 288 353T271 314Q240 271 184 255L170 250L184 245Q202 239 220 230T262 196T290 137Q291 131 291 1Q291 -134 296 -147Q306 -174 339 -192T415 -213Q429 -213 431 -216Q434 -219 434 -231Z"></path><path id="MJX-72-TEX-N-50" d="M130 622Q123 629 119 631T103 634T60 637H27V683H214Q237 683 276 683T331 684Q419 684 471 671T567 616Q624 563 624 489Q624 421 573 372T451 307Q429 302 328 301H234V181Q234 62 237 58Q245 47 304 46H337V0H326Q305 3 182 3Q47 3 38 0H27V46H60Q102 47 111 49T130 61V622ZM507 488Q507 514 506 528T500 564T483 597T450 620T397 635Q385 637 307 637H286Q237 637 234 628Q231 624 231 483V342H302H339Q390 342 423 349T481 382Q507 411 507 488Z"></path><path id="MJX-72-TEX-N-51" d="M56 341Q56 499 157 602T388 705Q521 705 621 601T722 341Q722 275 703 218T660 127T603 63T555 25T525 9Q524 8 524 8H523Q524 5 526 -1T537 -21T555 -47T581 -67T615 -76Q653 -76 678 -56T706 -3Q707 10 716 10Q721 10 728 5L727 -13Q727 -88 697 -140T606 -193Q563 -193 538 -166T498 -83Q483 -23 483 -8L471 -11Q459 -14 435 -18T388 -22Q254 -22 155 81T56 341ZM607 339Q607 429 586 496T531 598T461 649T390 665T318 649T248 598T192 496T170 339Q170 143 277 57Q301 39 305 39L304 42Q304 44 304 46Q301 53 301 68Q301 101 325 128T391 155Q454 155 495 70L501 58Q549 91 578 164Q607 234 607 339ZM385 18Q404 18 425 23T459 33T472 40Q471 47 468 57T449 88T412 115Q398 117 386 117Q367 117 353 102T338 67Q338 48 351 33T385 18Z"></path><path id="MJX-72-TEX-N-32" d="M109 429Q82 429 66 447T50 491Q50 562 103 614T235 666Q326 666 387 610T449 465Q449 422 429 383T381 315T301 241Q265 210 201 149L142 93L218 92Q375 92 385 97Q392 99 409 186V189H449V186Q448 183 436 95T421 3V0H50V19V31Q50 38 56 46T86 81Q115 113 136 137Q145 147 170 174T204 211T233 244T261 278T284 308T305 340T320 369T333 401T340 431T343 464Q343 527 309 573T212 619Q179 619 154 602T119 569T109 550Q109 549 114 549Q132 549 151 535T170 489Q170 464 154 447T109 429Z"></path><path id="MJX-72-TEX-N-52" d="M130 622Q123 629 119 631T103 634T60 637H27V683H202H236H300Q376 683 417 677T500 648Q595 600 609 517Q610 512 610 501Q610 468 594 439T556 392T511 361T472 343L456 338Q459 335 467 332Q497 316 516 298T545 254T559 211T568 155T578 94Q588 46 602 31T640 16H645Q660 16 674 32T692 87Q692 98 696 101T712 105T728 103T732 90Q732 59 716 27T672 -16Q656 -22 630 -22Q481 -16 458 90Q456 101 456 163T449 246Q430 304 373 320L363 322L297 323H231V192L232 61Q238 51 249 49T301 46H334V0H323Q302 3 181 3Q59 3 38 0H27V46H60Q102 47 111 49T130 61V622ZM491 499V509Q491 527 490 539T481 570T462 601T424 623T362 636Q360 636 340 636T304 637H283Q238 637 234 628Q231 624 231 492V360H289Q390 360 434 378T489 456Q491 467 491 499Z"></path><path id="MJX-72-TEX-N-33" d="M127 463Q100 463 85 480T69 524Q69 579 117 622T233 665Q268 665 277 664Q351 652 390 611T430 522Q430 470 396 421T302 350L299 348Q299 347 308 345T337 336T375 315Q457 262 457 175Q457 96 395 37T238 -22Q158 -22 100 21T42 130Q42 158 60 175T105 193Q133 193 151 175T169 130Q169 119 166 110T159 94T148 82T136 74T126 70T118 67L114 66Q165 21 238 21Q293 21 321 74Q338 107 338 175V195Q338 290 274 322Q259 328 213 329L171 330L168 332Q166 335 166 348Q166 366 174 366Q202 366 232 371Q266 376 294 413T322 525V533Q322 590 287 612Q265 626 240 626Q208 626 181 615T143 592T132 580H135Q138 579 143 578T153 573T165 566T175 555T183 540T186 520Q186 498 172 481T127 463Z"></path><path id="MJX-72-TEX-N-53" d="M55 507Q55 590 112 647T243 704H257Q342 704 405 641L426 672Q431 679 436 687T446 700L449 704Q450 704 453 704T459 705H463Q466 705 472 699V462L466 456H448Q437 456 435 459T430 479Q413 605 329 646Q292 662 254 662Q201 662 168 626T135 542Q135 508 152 480T200 435Q210 431 286 412T370 389Q427 367 463 314T500 191Q500 110 448 45T301 -21Q245 -21 201 -4T140 27L122 41Q118 36 107 21T87 -7T78 -21Q76 -22 68 -22H64Q61 -22 55 -16V101Q55 220 56 222Q58 227 76 227H89Q95 221 95 214Q95 182 105 151T139 90T205 42T305 24Q352 24 386 62T420 155Q420 198 398 233T340 281Q284 295 266 300Q261 301 239 306T206 314T174 325T141 343T112 367T85 402Q55 451 55 507Z"></path><path id="MJX-72-TEX-N-7D" d="M65 731Q65 745 68 747T88 750Q171 750 216 725T279 670Q288 649 289 635T291 501Q292 362 293 357Q306 312 345 291T417 269Q428 269 431 266T434 250T431 234T417 231Q380 231 345 210T298 157Q293 143 292 121T291 -28V-79Q291 -134 285 -156T256 -198Q202 -250 89 -250Q71 -250 68 -247T65 -230Q65 -224 65 -223T66 -218T69 -214T77 -213Q91 -213 108 -210T146 -200T183 -177T207 -139Q208 -134 209 3L210 139Q223 196 280 230Q315 247 330 250Q305 257 280 270Q225 304 212 352L210 362L209 498Q208 635 207 640Q195 680 154 696T77 713Q68 713 67 716T65 731Z"></path><path id="MJX-72-TEX-N-2C" d="M78 35T78 60T94 103T137 121Q165 121 187 96T210 8Q210 -27 201 -60T180 -117T154 -158T130 -185T117 -194Q113 -194 104 -185T95 -172Q95 -168 106 -156T131 -126T157 -76T173 -3V9L172 8Q170 7 167 6T161 3T152 1T140 0Q113 0 96 17Z"></path><path id="MJX-72-TEX-N-2E" d="M78 60Q78 84 95 102T138 120Q162 120 180 104T199 61Q199 36 182 18T139 0T96 17T78 60Z"></path></defs><g stroke="currentColor" fill="currentColor" stroke-width="0" transform="scale(1,-1)"><g ><g ><g transform="translate(0,1428.7)"><g ><g ><g ><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-72-TEX-N-55"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(783,-150) scale(0.707)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-72-TEX-N-31"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(1464.3,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-72-TEX-N-3D"></use></g><g transform="translate(2520.1,0)"><g transform="translate(220,799.3) scale(0.707)"><g transform="translate(0 -0.5)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-72-TEX-LO-7B"></use></g><g transform="translate(667,0)"><g transform="translate(220,477.2) scale(0.707)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-72-TEX-I-1D451"></use></g><g transform="translate(520,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-72-TEX-I-1D6FD"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(292.5,-345) scale(0.707)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-72-TEX-I-1D451"></use></g><g transform="translate(520,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-72-TEX-I-1D461"></use></g></g><rect width="967.9" height="60" x="120" y="220"></rect></g><g transform="translate(1874.9,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-72-TEX-N-28"></use></g><g transform="translate(2263.9,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-72-TEX-I-1D465"></use></g><g transform="translate(2835.9,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-72-TEX-N-2212"></use></g><g transform="translate(3613.9,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-72-TEX-I-1D463"></use></g><g transform="translate(4098.9,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-72-TEX-I-1D461"></use></g><g transform="translate(4459.9,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-72-TEX-N-29"></use></g><g transform="translate(4848.9,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-72-TEX-N-2B"></use></g><g transform="translate(5626.9,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-72-TEX-I-1D6FD"></use></g><g transform="translate(6192.9,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-72-TEX-N-28"></use></g><g transform="translate(6581.9,0)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-72-TEX-I-1D462"></use></g><g transform="translate(605,-150) scale(0.707)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-72-TEX-N-31"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(7590.5,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-72-TEX-N-2212"></use></g><g transform="translate(8368.5,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-72-TEX-I-1D463"></use></g><g transform="translate(8853.5,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-72-TEX-N-29"></use></g><g transform="translate(9242.5,0) translate(0 -0.5)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-72-TEX-LO-7D"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(502.4,-370.3) scale(0.707)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-72-TEX-N-7B"></use></g><g transform="translate(500,0)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-72-TEX-N-50"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(1181,0)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-72-TEX-I-1D462"></use></g><g transform="translate(605,-150) scale(0.707)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-72-TEX-N-31"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(2189.6,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-72-TEX-N-2B"></use></g><g transform="translate(2967.6,0)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-72-TEX-N-51"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(3745.6,0)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-72-TEX-I-1D462"></use></g><g transform="translate(605,-150) scale(0.707)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-72-TEX-N-32"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(4754.1,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-72-TEX-N-2B"></use></g><g transform="translate(5532.1,0)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-72-TEX-N-52"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(6268.1,0)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-72-TEX-I-1D462"></use></g><g transform="translate(605,-150) scale(0.707)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-72-TEX-N-33"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(7276.7,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-72-TEX-N-2B"></use></g><g transform="translate(8054.7,0)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-72-TEX-N-53"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(8610.7,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-72-TEX-N-7D"></use></g></g><rect width="7207.1" height="60" x="120" y="220"></rect></g><g transform="translate(9967.2,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-72-TEX-N-2C"></use></g></g></g><g transform="translate(0,-277)"><g ><g ><g ><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-72-TEX-N-55"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(783,-150) scale(0.707)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-72-TEX-N-32"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(1464.3,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-72-TEX-N-3D"></use></g><g transform="translate(2520.1,0)"><g transform="translate(3084.5,446.1) scale(0.707)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-72-TEX-I-1D462"></use></g><g transform="translate(605,-150) scale(0.707)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-72-TEX-N-32"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(220,-370.3) scale(0.707)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-72-TEX-N-7B"></use></g><g transform="translate(500,0)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-72-TEX-N-50"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(1181,0)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-72-TEX-I-1D462"></use></g><g transform="translate(605,-150) scale(0.707)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-72-TEX-N-31"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(2189.6,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-72-TEX-N-2B"></use></g><g transform="translate(2967.6,0)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-72-TEX-N-51"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(3745.6,0)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-72-TEX-I-1D462"></use></g><g transform="translate(605,-150) scale(0.707)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-72-TEX-N-32"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(4754.1,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-72-TEX-N-2B"></use></g><g transform="translate(5532.1,0)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-72-TEX-N-52"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(6268.1,0)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-72-TEX-I-1D462"></use></g><g transform="translate(605,-150) scale(0.707)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-72-TEX-N-33"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(7276.7,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-72-TEX-N-2B"></use></g><g transform="translate(8054.7,0)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-72-TEX-N-53"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(8610.7,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-72-TEX-N-7D"></use></g></g><rect width="6642.2" height="60" x="120" y="220"></rect></g><g transform="translate(9402.3,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-72-TEX-N-2C"></use></g></g></g><g transform="translate(0,-1993.7)"><g ><g ><g ><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-72-TEX-N-55"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(783,-150) scale(0.707)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-72-TEX-N-33"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(1464.3,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-72-TEX-N-3D"></use></g><g transform="translate(2520.1,0)"><g transform="translate(3084.5,457.1) scale(0.707)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-72-TEX-I-1D462"></use></g><g transform="translate(605,-150) scale(0.707)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-72-TEX-N-33"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(220,-370.3) scale(0.707)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-72-TEX-N-7B"></use></g><g transform="translate(500,0)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-72-TEX-N-50"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(1181,0)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-72-TEX-I-1D462"></use></g><g transform="translate(605,-150) scale(0.707)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-72-TEX-N-31"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(2189.6,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-72-TEX-N-2B"></use></g><g transform="translate(2967.6,0)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-72-TEX-N-51"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(3745.6,0)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-72-TEX-I-1D462"></use></g><g transform="translate(605,-150) scale(0.707)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-72-TEX-N-32"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(4754.1,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-72-TEX-N-2B"></use></g><g transform="translate(5532.1,0)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-72-TEX-N-52"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(6268.1,0)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-72-TEX-I-1D462"></use></g><g transform="translate(605,-150) scale(0.707)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-72-TEX-N-33"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(7276.7,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-72-TEX-N-2B"></use></g><g transform="translate(8054.7,0)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-72-TEX-N-53"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(8610.7,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-72-TEX-N-7D"></use></g></g><rect width="6642.2" height="60" x="120" y="220"></rect></g><g transform="translate(9402.3,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-72-TEX-N-2E"></use></g></g></g></g></g></g></svg>
\ No newline at end of file diff --git a/77011-h/images/21.svg b/77011-h/images/21.svg new file mode 100644 index 0000000..aa17f2d --- /dev/null +++ b/77011-h/images/21.svg @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +<svg version="1.1" style="vertical-align: -3.756ex;" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="14404.3px" height="3820px" viewBox="0 -2160 14404.3 3820" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><defs><path id="MJX-74-TEX-N-55" d="M128 622Q121 629 117 631T101 634T58 637H25V683H36Q57 680 180 680Q315 680 324 683H335V637H302Q262 636 251 634T233 622L232 418V291Q232 189 240 145T280 67Q325 24 389 24Q454 24 506 64T571 183Q575 206 575 410V598Q569 608 565 613T541 627T489 637H472V683H481Q496 680 598 680T715 683H724V637H707Q634 633 622 598L621 399Q620 194 617 180Q617 179 615 171Q595 83 531 31T389 -22Q304 -22 226 33T130 192Q129 201 128 412V622Z"></path><path id="MJX-74-TEX-N-31" d="M213 578L200 573Q186 568 160 563T102 556H83V602H102Q149 604 189 617T245 641T273 663Q275 666 285 666Q294 666 302 660V361L303 61Q310 54 315 52T339 48T401 46H427V0H416Q395 3 257 3Q121 3 100 0H88V46H114Q136 46 152 46T177 47T193 50T201 52T207 57T213 61V578Z"></path><path id="MJX-74-TEX-N-3D" d="M56 347Q56 360 70 367H707Q722 359 722 347Q722 336 708 328L390 327H72Q56 332 56 347ZM56 153Q56 168 72 173H708Q722 163 722 153Q722 140 707 133H70Q56 140 56 153Z"></path><path id="MJX-74-TEX-I-1D6FD" d="M29 -194Q23 -188 23 -186Q23 -183 102 134T186 465Q208 533 243 584T309 658Q365 705 429 705H431Q493 705 533 667T573 570Q573 465 469 396L482 383Q533 332 533 252Q533 139 448 65T257 -10Q227 -10 203 -2T165 17T143 40T131 59T126 65L62 -188Q60 -194 42 -194H29ZM353 431Q392 431 427 419L432 422Q436 426 439 429T449 439T461 453T472 471T484 495T493 524T501 560Q503 569 503 593Q503 611 502 616Q487 667 426 667Q384 667 347 643T286 582T247 514T224 455Q219 439 186 308T152 168Q151 163 151 147Q151 99 173 68Q204 26 260 26Q302 26 349 51T425 137Q441 171 449 214T457 279Q457 337 422 372Q380 358 347 358H337Q258 358 258 389Q258 396 261 403Q275 431 353 431Z"></path><path id="MJX-74-TEX-N-28" d="M94 250Q94 319 104 381T127 488T164 576T202 643T244 695T277 729T302 750H315H319Q333 750 333 741Q333 738 316 720T275 667T226 581T184 443T167 250T184 58T225 -81T274 -167T316 -220T333 -241Q333 -250 318 -250H315H302L274 -226Q180 -141 137 -14T94 250Z"></path><path id="MJX-74-TEX-I-1D462" d="M21 287Q21 295 30 318T55 370T99 420T158 442Q204 442 227 417T250 358Q250 340 216 246T182 105Q182 62 196 45T238 27T291 44T328 78L339 95Q341 99 377 247Q407 367 413 387T427 416Q444 431 463 431Q480 431 488 421T496 402L420 84Q419 79 419 68Q419 43 426 35T447 26Q469 29 482 57T512 145Q514 153 532 153Q551 153 551 144Q550 139 549 130T540 98T523 55T498 17T462 -8Q454 -10 438 -10Q372 -10 347 46Q345 45 336 36T318 21T296 6T267 -6T233 -11Q189 -11 155 7Q103 38 103 113Q103 170 138 262T173 379Q173 380 173 381Q173 390 173 393T169 400T158 404H154Q131 404 112 385T82 344T65 302T57 280Q55 278 41 278H27Q21 284 21 287Z"></path><path id="MJX-74-TEX-N-2212" d="M84 237T84 250T98 270H679Q694 262 694 250T679 230H98Q84 237 84 250Z"></path><path id="MJX-74-TEX-I-1D463" d="M173 380Q173 405 154 405Q130 405 104 376T61 287Q60 286 59 284T58 281T56 279T53 278T49 278T41 278H27Q21 284 21 287Q21 294 29 316T53 368T97 419T160 441Q202 441 225 417T249 361Q249 344 246 335Q246 329 231 291T200 202T182 113Q182 86 187 69Q200 26 250 26Q287 26 319 60T369 139T398 222T409 277Q409 300 401 317T383 343T365 361T357 383Q357 405 376 424T417 443Q436 443 451 425T467 367Q467 340 455 284T418 159T347 40T241 -11Q177 -11 139 22Q102 54 102 117Q102 148 110 181T151 298Q173 362 173 380Z"></path><path id="MJX-74-TEX-N-29" d="M60 749L64 750Q69 750 74 750H86L114 726Q208 641 251 514T294 250Q294 182 284 119T261 12T224 -76T186 -143T145 -194T113 -227T90 -246Q87 -249 86 -250H74Q66 -250 63 -250T58 -247T55 -238Q56 -237 66 -225Q221 -64 221 250T66 725Q56 737 55 738Q55 746 60 749Z"></path><path id="MJX-74-TEX-N-7B" d="M434 -231Q434 -244 428 -250H410Q281 -250 230 -184Q225 -177 222 -172T217 -161T213 -148T211 -133T210 -111T209 -84T209 -47T209 0Q209 21 209 53Q208 142 204 153Q203 154 203 155Q189 191 153 211T82 231Q71 231 68 234T65 250T68 266T82 269Q116 269 152 289T203 345Q208 356 208 377T209 529V579Q209 634 215 656T244 698Q270 724 324 740Q361 748 377 749Q379 749 390 749T408 750H428Q434 744 434 732Q434 719 431 716Q429 713 415 713Q362 710 332 689T296 647Q291 634 291 499V417Q291 370 288 353T271 314Q240 271 184 255L170 250L184 245Q202 239 220 230T262 196T290 137Q291 131 291 1Q291 -134 296 -147Q306 -174 339 -192T415 -213Q429 -213 431 -216Q434 -219 434 -231Z"></path><path id="MJX-74-TEX-N-50" d="M130 622Q123 629 119 631T103 634T60 637H27V683H214Q237 683 276 683T331 684Q419 684 471 671T567 616Q624 563 624 489Q624 421 573 372T451 307Q429 302 328 301H234V181Q234 62 237 58Q245 47 304 46H337V0H326Q305 3 182 3Q47 3 38 0H27V46H60Q102 47 111 49T130 61V622ZM507 488Q507 514 506 528T500 564T483 597T450 620T397 635Q385 637 307 637H286Q237 637 234 628Q231 624 231 483V342H302H339Q390 342 423 349T481 382Q507 411 507 488Z"></path><path id="MJX-74-TEX-N-2B" d="M56 237T56 250T70 270H369V420L370 570Q380 583 389 583Q402 583 409 568V270H707Q722 262 722 250T707 230H409V-68Q401 -82 391 -82H389H387Q375 -82 369 -68V230H70Q56 237 56 250Z"></path><path id="MJX-74-TEX-N-51" d="M56 341Q56 499 157 602T388 705Q521 705 621 601T722 341Q722 275 703 218T660 127T603 63T555 25T525 9Q524 8 524 8H523Q524 5 526 -1T537 -21T555 -47T581 -67T615 -76Q653 -76 678 -56T706 -3Q707 10 716 10Q721 10 728 5L727 -13Q727 -88 697 -140T606 -193Q563 -193 538 -166T498 -83Q483 -23 483 -8L471 -11Q459 -14 435 -18T388 -22Q254 -22 155 81T56 341ZM607 339Q607 429 586 496T531 598T461 649T390 665T318 649T248 598T192 496T170 339Q170 143 277 57Q301 39 305 39L304 42Q304 44 304 46Q301 53 301 68Q301 101 325 128T391 155Q454 155 495 70L501 58Q549 91 578 164Q607 234 607 339ZM385 18Q404 18 425 23T459 33T472 40Q471 47 468 57T449 88T412 115Q398 117 386 117Q367 117 353 102T338 67Q338 48 351 33T385 18Z"></path><path id="MJX-74-TEX-N-32" d="M109 429Q82 429 66 447T50 491Q50 562 103 614T235 666Q326 666 387 610T449 465Q449 422 429 383T381 315T301 241Q265 210 201 149L142 93L218 92Q375 92 385 97Q392 99 409 186V189H449V186Q448 183 436 95T421 3V0H50V19V31Q50 38 56 46T86 81Q115 113 136 137Q145 147 170 174T204 211T233 244T261 278T284 308T305 340T320 369T333 401T340 431T343 464Q343 527 309 573T212 619Q179 619 154 602T119 569T109 550Q109 549 114 549Q132 549 151 535T170 489Q170 464 154 447T109 429Z"></path><path id="MJX-74-TEX-N-52" d="M130 622Q123 629 119 631T103 634T60 637H27V683H202H236H300Q376 683 417 677T500 648Q595 600 609 517Q610 512 610 501Q610 468 594 439T556 392T511 361T472 343L456 338Q459 335 467 332Q497 316 516 298T545 254T559 211T568 155T578 94Q588 46 602 31T640 16H645Q660 16 674 32T692 87Q692 98 696 101T712 105T728 103T732 90Q732 59 716 27T672 -16Q656 -22 630 -22Q481 -16 458 90Q456 101 456 163T449 246Q430 304 373 320L363 322L297 323H231V192L232 61Q238 51 249 49T301 46H334V0H323Q302 3 181 3Q59 3 38 0H27V46H60Q102 47 111 49T130 61V622ZM491 499V509Q491 527 490 539T481 570T462 601T424 623T362 636Q360 636 340 636T304 637H283Q238 637 234 628Q231 624 231 492V360H289Q390 360 434 378T489 456Q491 467 491 499Z"></path><path id="MJX-74-TEX-N-33" d="M127 463Q100 463 85 480T69 524Q69 579 117 622T233 665Q268 665 277 664Q351 652 390 611T430 522Q430 470 396 421T302 350L299 348Q299 347 308 345T337 336T375 315Q457 262 457 175Q457 96 395 37T238 -22Q158 -22 100 21T42 130Q42 158 60 175T105 193Q133 193 151 175T169 130Q169 119 166 110T159 94T148 82T136 74T126 70T118 67L114 66Q165 21 238 21Q293 21 321 74Q338 107 338 175V195Q338 290 274 322Q259 328 213 329L171 330L168 332Q166 335 166 348Q166 366 174 366Q202 366 232 371Q266 376 294 413T322 525V533Q322 590 287 612Q265 626 240 626Q208 626 181 615T143 592T132 580H135Q138 579 143 578T153 573T165 566T175 555T183 540T186 520Q186 498 172 481T127 463Z"></path><path id="MJX-74-TEX-N-53" d="M55 507Q55 590 112 647T243 704H257Q342 704 405 641L426 672Q431 679 436 687T446 700L449 704Q450 704 453 704T459 705H463Q466 705 472 699V462L466 456H448Q437 456 435 459T430 479Q413 605 329 646Q292 662 254 662Q201 662 168 626T135 542Q135 508 152 480T200 435Q210 431 286 412T370 389Q427 367 463 314T500 191Q500 110 448 45T301 -21Q245 -21 201 -4T140 27L122 41Q118 36 107 21T87 -7T78 -21Q76 -22 68 -22H64Q61 -22 55 -16V101Q55 220 56 222Q58 227 76 227H89Q95 221 95 214Q95 182 105 151T139 90T205 42T305 24Q352 24 386 62T420 155Q420 198 398 233T340 281Q284 295 266 300Q261 301 239 306T206 314T174 325T141 343T112 367T85 402Q55 451 55 507Z"></path><path id="MJX-74-TEX-N-7D" d="M65 731Q65 745 68 747T88 750Q171 750 216 725T279 670Q288 649 289 635T291 501Q292 362 293 357Q306 312 345 291T417 269Q428 269 431 266T434 250T431 234T417 231Q380 231 345 210T298 157Q293 143 292 121T291 -28V-79Q291 -134 285 -156T256 -198Q202 -250 89 -250Q71 -250 68 -247T65 -230Q65 -224 65 -223T66 -218T69 -214T77 -213Q91 -213 108 -210T146 -200T183 -177T207 -139Q208 -134 209 3L210 139Q223 196 280 230Q315 247 330 250Q305 257 280 270Q225 304 212 352L210 362L209 498Q208 635 207 640Q195 680 154 696T77 713Q68 713 67 716T65 731Z"></path><path id="MJX-74-TEX-N-2C" d="M78 35T78 60T94 103T137 121Q165 121 187 96T210 8Q210 -27 201 -60T180 -117T154 -158T130 -185T117 -194Q113 -194 104 -185T95 -172Q95 -168 106 -156T131 -126T157 -76T173 -3V9L172 8Q170 7 167 6T161 3T152 1T140 0Q113 0 96 17Z"></path><path id="MJX-74-TEX-N-61" d="M137 305T115 305T78 320T63 359Q63 394 97 421T218 448Q291 448 336 416T396 340Q401 326 401 309T402 194V124Q402 76 407 58T428 40Q443 40 448 56T453 109V145H493V106Q492 66 490 59Q481 29 455 12T400 -6T353 12T329 54V58L327 55Q325 52 322 49T314 40T302 29T287 17T269 6T247 -2T221 -8T190 -11Q130 -11 82 20T34 107Q34 128 41 147T68 188T116 225T194 253T304 268H318V290Q318 324 312 340Q290 411 215 411Q197 411 181 410T156 406T148 403Q170 388 170 359Q170 334 154 320ZM126 106Q126 75 150 51T209 26Q247 26 276 49T315 109Q317 116 318 175Q318 233 317 233Q309 233 296 232T251 223T193 203T147 166T126 106Z"></path><path id="MJX-74-TEX-N-6E" d="M41 46H55Q94 46 102 60V68Q102 77 102 91T102 122T103 161T103 203Q103 234 103 269T102 328V351Q99 370 88 376T43 385H25V408Q25 431 27 431L37 432Q47 433 65 434T102 436Q119 437 138 438T167 441T178 442H181V402Q181 364 182 364T187 369T199 384T218 402T247 421T285 437Q305 442 336 442Q450 438 463 329Q464 322 464 190V104Q464 66 466 59T477 49Q498 46 526 46H542V0H534L510 1Q487 2 460 2T422 3Q319 3 310 0H302V46H318Q379 46 379 62Q380 64 380 200Q379 335 378 343Q372 371 358 385T334 402T308 404Q263 404 229 370Q202 343 195 315T187 232V168V108Q187 78 188 68T191 55T200 49Q221 46 249 46H265V0H257L234 1Q210 2 183 2T145 3Q42 3 33 0H25V46H41Z"></path><path id="MJX-74-TEX-N-64" d="M376 495Q376 511 376 535T377 568Q377 613 367 624T316 637H298V660Q298 683 300 683L310 684Q320 685 339 686T376 688Q393 689 413 690T443 693T454 694H457V390Q457 84 458 81Q461 61 472 55T517 46H535V0Q533 0 459 -5T380 -11H373V44L365 37Q307 -11 235 -11Q158 -11 96 50T34 215Q34 315 97 378T244 442Q319 442 376 393V495ZM373 342Q328 405 260 405Q211 405 173 369Q146 341 139 305T131 211Q131 155 138 120T173 59Q203 26 251 26Q322 26 373 103V342Z"></path><path id="MJX-74-TEX-N-54" d="M36 443Q37 448 46 558T55 671V677H666V671Q667 666 676 556T685 443V437H645V443Q645 445 642 478T631 544T610 593Q593 614 555 625Q534 630 478 630H451H443Q417 630 414 618Q413 616 413 339V63Q420 53 439 50T528 46H558V0H545L361 3Q186 1 177 0H164V46H194Q264 46 283 49T309 63V339V550Q309 620 304 625T271 630H244H224Q154 630 119 601Q101 585 93 554T81 486T76 443V437H36V443Z"></path><path id="MJX-74-TEX-I-1D465" d="M52 289Q59 331 106 386T222 442Q257 442 286 424T329 379Q371 442 430 442Q467 442 494 420T522 361Q522 332 508 314T481 292T458 288Q439 288 427 299T415 328Q415 374 465 391Q454 404 425 404Q412 404 406 402Q368 386 350 336Q290 115 290 78Q290 50 306 38T341 26Q378 26 414 59T463 140Q466 150 469 151T485 153H489Q504 153 504 145Q504 144 502 134Q486 77 440 33T333 -11Q263 -11 227 52Q186 -10 133 -10H127Q78 -10 57 16T35 71Q35 103 54 123T99 143Q142 143 142 101Q142 81 130 66T107 46T94 41L91 40Q91 39 97 36T113 29T132 26Q168 26 194 71Q203 87 217 139T245 247T261 313Q266 340 266 352Q266 380 251 392T217 404Q177 404 142 372T93 290Q91 281 88 280T72 278H58Q52 284 52 289Z"></path><path id="MJX-74-TEX-I-1D466" d="M21 287Q21 301 36 335T84 406T158 442Q199 442 224 419T250 355Q248 336 247 334Q247 331 231 288T198 191T182 105Q182 62 196 45T238 27Q261 27 281 38T312 61T339 94Q339 95 344 114T358 173T377 247Q415 397 419 404Q432 431 462 431Q475 431 483 424T494 412T496 403Q496 390 447 193T391 -23Q363 -106 294 -155T156 -205Q111 -205 77 -183T43 -117Q43 -95 50 -80T69 -58T89 -48T106 -45Q150 -45 150 -87Q150 -107 138 -122T115 -142T102 -147L99 -148Q101 -153 118 -160T152 -167H160Q177 -167 186 -165Q219 -156 247 -127T290 -65T313 -9T321 21L315 17Q309 13 296 6T270 -6Q250 -11 231 -11Q185 -11 150 11T104 82Q103 89 103 113Q103 170 138 262T173 379Q173 380 173 381Q173 390 173 393T169 400T158 404H154Q131 404 112 385T82 344T65 302T57 280Q55 278 41 278H27Q21 284 21 287Z"></path><path id="MJX-74-TEX-I-1D467" d="M347 338Q337 338 294 349T231 360Q211 360 197 356T174 346T162 335T155 324L153 320Q150 317 138 317Q117 317 117 325Q117 330 120 339Q133 378 163 406T229 440Q241 442 246 442Q271 442 291 425T329 392T367 375Q389 375 411 408T434 441Q435 442 449 442H462Q468 436 468 434Q468 430 463 420T449 399T432 377T418 358L411 349Q368 298 275 214T160 106L148 94L163 93Q185 93 227 82T290 71Q328 71 360 90T402 140Q406 149 409 151T424 153Q443 153 443 143Q443 138 442 134Q425 72 376 31T278 -11Q252 -11 232 6T193 40T155 57Q111 57 76 -3Q70 -11 59 -11H54H41Q35 -5 35 -2Q35 13 93 84Q132 129 225 214T340 322Q352 338 347 338Z"></path><path id="MJX-74-TEX-I-1D461" d="M26 385Q19 392 19 395Q19 399 22 411T27 425Q29 430 36 430T87 431H140L159 511Q162 522 166 540T173 566T179 586T187 603T197 615T211 624T229 626Q247 625 254 615T261 596Q261 589 252 549T232 470L222 433Q222 431 272 431H323Q330 424 330 420Q330 398 317 385H210L174 240Q135 80 135 68Q135 26 162 26Q197 26 230 60T283 144Q285 150 288 151T303 153H307Q322 153 322 145Q322 142 319 133Q314 117 301 95T267 48T216 6T155 -11Q125 -11 98 4T59 56Q57 64 57 83V101L92 241Q127 382 128 383Q128 385 77 385H26Z"></path><path id="MJX-74-TEX-N-2E" d="M78 60Q78 84 95 102T138 120Q162 120 180 104T199 61Q199 36 182 18T139 0T96 17T78 60Z"></path></defs><g stroke="currentColor" fill="currentColor" stroke-width="0" transform="scale(1,-1)"><g ><g ><g transform="translate(0,700)"><g ><g ><g ><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-74-TEX-N-55"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(783,-150) scale(0.707)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-74-TEX-N-31"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(1464.3,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-74-TEX-N-3D"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(3242.3,0)"><g ><g ><g transform="translate(3412,710)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-74-TEX-I-1D6FD"></use></g><g transform="translate(566,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-74-TEX-N-28"></use></g><g transform="translate(955,0)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-74-TEX-I-1D462"></use></g><g transform="translate(605,-150) scale(0.707)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-74-TEX-N-31"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(2185.8,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-74-TEX-N-2212"></use></g><g transform="translate(3186,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-74-TEX-I-1D463"></use></g><g transform="translate(3671,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-74-TEX-N-29"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(220,-710)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-74-TEX-N-7B"></use></g><g transform="translate(500,0)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-74-TEX-N-50"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(1181,0)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-74-TEX-I-1D462"></use></g><g transform="translate(605,-150) scale(0.707)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-74-TEX-N-31"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(2411.8,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-74-TEX-N-2B"></use></g><g transform="translate(3412,0)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-74-TEX-N-51"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(4190,0)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-74-TEX-I-1D462"></use></g><g transform="translate(605,-150) scale(0.707)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-74-TEX-N-32"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(5420.8,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-74-TEX-N-2B"></use></g><g transform="translate(6421,0)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-74-TEX-N-52"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(7157,0)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-74-TEX-I-1D462"></use></g><g transform="translate(605,-150) scale(0.707)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-74-TEX-N-33"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(8387.8,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-74-TEX-N-2B"></use></g><g transform="translate(9388,0)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-74-TEX-N-53"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(9944,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-74-TEX-N-7D"></use></g></g><rect width="10644" height="60" x="120" y="220"></rect></g></g><g transform="translate(10884,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-74-TEX-N-2C"></use></g></g></g><g transform="translate(0,-1410)"><g ><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-74-TEX-N-61"></use><use xlink:href="#MJX-74-TEX-N-6E" transform="translate(500,0)"></use><use xlink:href="#MJX-74-TEX-N-64" transform="translate(1056,0)"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(3242.3,0)"><g ><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-74-TEX-N-54"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(999.8,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-74-TEX-N-3D"></use></g><g transform="translate(2055.6,0)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-74-TEX-N-50"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(2736.6,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-74-TEX-I-1D465"></use></g><g transform="translate(3530.8,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-74-TEX-N-2B"></use></g><g transform="translate(4531,0)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-74-TEX-N-51"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(5309,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-74-TEX-I-1D466"></use></g><g transform="translate(6021.2,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-74-TEX-N-2B"></use></g><g transform="translate(7021.4,0)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-74-TEX-N-52"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(7757.4,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-74-TEX-I-1D467"></use></g><g transform="translate(8444.7,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-74-TEX-N-2B"></use></g><g transform="translate(9444.9,0)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-74-TEX-N-53"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(10000.9,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-74-TEX-I-1D461"></use></g><g transform="translate(10361.9,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-74-TEX-N-2E"></use></g></g></g></g></g></g></svg>
\ No newline at end of file diff --git a/77011-h/images/22.svg b/77011-h/images/22.svg new file mode 100644 index 0000000..b534440 --- /dev/null +++ b/77011-h/images/22.svg @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +<svg version="1.1" style="vertical-align: -0.437ex;" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="4959.1px" height="898px" viewBox="0 -705 4959.1 898" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><defs><path id="MJX-75-TEX-N-51" d="M56 341Q56 499 157 602T388 705Q521 705 621 601T722 341Q722 275 703 218T660 127T603 63T555 25T525 9Q524 8 524 8H523Q524 5 526 -1T537 -21T555 -47T581 -67T615 -76Q653 -76 678 -56T706 -3Q707 10 716 10Q721 10 728 5L727 -13Q727 -88 697 -140T606 -193Q563 -193 538 -166T498 -83Q483 -23 483 -8L471 -11Q459 -14 435 -18T388 -22Q254 -22 155 81T56 341ZM607 339Q607 429 586 496T531 598T461 649T390 665T318 649T248 598T192 496T170 339Q170 143 277 57Q301 39 305 39L304 42Q304 44 304 46Q301 53 301 68Q301 101 325 128T391 155Q454 155 495 70L501 58Q549 91 578 164Q607 234 607 339ZM385 18Q404 18 425 23T459 33T472 40Q471 47 468 57T449 88T412 115Q398 117 386 117Q367 117 353 102T338 67Q338 48 351 33T385 18Z"></path><path id="MJX-75-TEX-N-3D" d="M56 347Q56 360 70 367H707Q722 359 722 347Q722 336 708 328L390 327H72Q56 332 56 347ZM56 153Q56 168 72 173H708Q722 163 722 153Q722 140 707 133H70Q56 140 56 153Z"></path><path id="MJX-75-TEX-N-52" d="M130 622Q123 629 119 631T103 634T60 637H27V683H202H236H300Q376 683 417 677T500 648Q595 600 609 517Q610 512 610 501Q610 468 594 439T556 392T511 361T472 343L456 338Q459 335 467 332Q497 316 516 298T545 254T559 211T568 155T578 94Q588 46 602 31T640 16H645Q660 16 674 32T692 87Q692 98 696 101T712 105T728 103T732 90Q732 59 716 27T672 -16Q656 -22 630 -22Q481 -16 458 90Q456 101 456 163T449 246Q430 304 373 320L363 322L297 323H231V192L232 61Q238 51 249 49T301 46H334V0H323Q302 3 181 3Q59 3 38 0H27V46H60Q102 47 111 49T130 61V622ZM491 499V509Q491 527 490 539T481 570T462 601T424 623T362 636Q360 636 340 636T304 637H283Q238 637 234 628Q231 624 231 492V360H289Q390 360 434 378T489 456Q491 467 491 499Z"></path><path id="MJX-75-TEX-N-30" d="M96 585Q152 666 249 666Q297 666 345 640T423 548Q460 465 460 320Q460 165 417 83Q397 41 362 16T301 -15T250 -22Q224 -22 198 -16T137 16T82 83Q39 165 39 320Q39 494 96 585ZM321 597Q291 629 250 629Q208 629 178 597Q153 571 145 525T137 333Q137 175 145 125T181 46Q209 16 250 16Q290 16 318 46Q347 76 354 130T362 333Q362 478 354 524T321 597Z"></path><path id="MJX-75-TEX-N-2E" d="M78 60Q78 84 95 102T138 120Q162 120 180 104T199 61Q199 36 182 18T139 0T96 17T78 60Z"></path></defs><g stroke="currentColor" fill="currentColor" stroke-width="0" transform="scale(1,-1)"><g ><g ><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-75-TEX-N-51"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(1055.8,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-75-TEX-N-3D"></use></g><g transform="translate(2111.6,0)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-75-TEX-N-52"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(3125.3,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-75-TEX-N-3D"></use></g><g transform="translate(4181.1,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-75-TEX-N-30"></use><use xlink:href="#MJX-75-TEX-N-2E" transform="translate(500,0)"></use></g></g></g></svg>
\ No newline at end of file diff --git a/77011-h/images/23.svg b/77011-h/images/23.svg new file mode 100644 index 0000000..020b06e --- /dev/null +++ b/77011-h/images/23.svg @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +<svg version="1.1" style="vertical-align: -8.941ex;" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="12048.3px" height="8404px" viewBox="0 -4452 12048.3 8404" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><defs><path id="MJX-76-TEX-N-54" d="M36 443Q37 448 46 558T55 671V677H666V671Q667 666 676 556T685 443V437H645V443Q645 445 642 478T631 544T610 593Q593 614 555 625Q534 630 478 630H451H443Q417 630 414 618Q413 616 413 339V63Q420 53 439 50T528 46H558V0H545L361 3Q186 1 177 0H164V46H194Q264 46 283 49T309 63V339V550Q309 620 304 625T271 630H244H224Q154 630 119 601Q101 585 93 554T81 486T76 443V437H36V443Z"></path><path id="MJX-76-TEX-N-3D" d="M56 347Q56 360 70 367H707Q722 359 722 347Q722 336 708 328L390 327H72Q56 332 56 347ZM56 153Q56 168 72 173H708Q722 163 722 153Q722 140 707 133H70Q56 140 56 153Z"></path><path id="MJX-76-TEX-N-50" d="M130 622Q123 629 119 631T103 634T60 637H27V683H214Q237 683 276 683T331 684Q419 684 471 671T567 616Q624 563 624 489Q624 421 573 372T451 307Q429 302 328 301H234V181Q234 62 237 58Q245 47 304 46H337V0H326Q305 3 182 3Q47 3 38 0H27V46H60Q102 47 111 49T130 61V622ZM507 488Q507 514 506 528T500 564T483 597T450 620T397 635Q385 637 307 637H286Q237 637 234 628Q231 624 231 483V342H302H339Q390 342 423 349T481 382Q507 411 507 488Z"></path><path id="MJX-76-TEX-I-1D465" d="M52 289Q59 331 106 386T222 442Q257 442 286 424T329 379Q371 442 430 442Q467 442 494 420T522 361Q522 332 508 314T481 292T458 288Q439 288 427 299T415 328Q415 374 465 391Q454 404 425 404Q412 404 406 402Q368 386 350 336Q290 115 290 78Q290 50 306 38T341 26Q378 26 414 59T463 140Q466 150 469 151T485 153H489Q504 153 504 145Q504 144 502 134Q486 77 440 33T333 -11Q263 -11 227 52Q186 -10 133 -10H127Q78 -10 57 16T35 71Q35 103 54 123T99 143Q142 143 142 101Q142 81 130 66T107 46T94 41L91 40Q91 39 97 36T113 29T132 26Q168 26 194 71Q203 87 217 139T245 247T261 313Q266 340 266 352Q266 380 251 392T217 404Q177 404 142 372T93 290Q91 281 88 280T72 278H58Q52 284 52 289Z"></path><path id="MJX-76-TEX-N-2B" d="M56 237T56 250T70 270H369V420L370 570Q380 583 389 583Q402 583 409 568V270H707Q722 262 722 250T707 230H409V-68Q401 -82 391 -82H389H387Q375 -82 369 -68V230H70Q56 237 56 250Z"></path><path id="MJX-76-TEX-N-53" d="M55 507Q55 590 112 647T243 704H257Q342 704 405 641L426 672Q431 679 436 687T446 700L449 704Q450 704 453 704T459 705H463Q466 705 472 699V462L466 456H448Q437 456 435 459T430 479Q413 605 329 646Q292 662 254 662Q201 662 168 626T135 542Q135 508 152 480T200 435Q210 431 286 412T370 389Q427 367 463 314T500 191Q500 110 448 45T301 -21Q245 -21 201 -4T140 27L122 41Q118 36 107 21T87 -7T78 -21Q76 -22 68 -22H64Q61 -22 55 -16V101Q55 220 56 222Q58 227 76 227H89Q95 221 95 214Q95 182 105 151T139 90T205 42T305 24Q352 24 386 62T420 155Q420 198 398 233T340 281Q284 295 266 300Q261 301 239 306T206 314T174 325T141 343T112 367T85 402Q55 451 55 507Z"></path><path id="MJX-76-TEX-I-1D461" d="M26 385Q19 392 19 395Q19 399 22 411T27 425Q29 430 36 430T87 431H140L159 511Q162 522 166 540T173 566T179 586T187 603T197 615T211 624T229 626Q247 625 254 615T261 596Q261 589 252 549T232 470L222 433Q222 431 272 431H323Q330 424 330 420Q330 398 317 385H210L174 240Q135 80 135 68Q135 26 162 26Q197 26 230 60T283 144Q285 150 288 151T303 153H307Q322 153 322 145Q322 142 319 133Q314 117 301 95T267 48T216 6T155 -11Q125 -11 98 4T59 56Q57 64 57 83V101L92 241Q127 382 128 383Q128 385 77 385H26Z"></path><path id="MJX-76-TEX-N-2C" d="M78 35T78 60T94 103T137 121Q165 121 187 96T210 8Q210 -27 201 -60T180 -117T154 -158T130 -185T117 -194Q113 -194 104 -185T95 -172Q95 -168 106 -156T131 -126T157 -76T173 -3V9L172 8Q170 7 167 6T161 3T152 1T140 0Q113 0 96 17Z"></path><path id="MJX-76-TEX-N-55" d="M128 622Q121 629 117 631T101 634T58 637H25V683H36Q57 680 180 680Q315 680 324 683H335V637H302Q262 636 251 634T233 622L232 418V291Q232 189 240 145T280 67Q325 24 389 24Q454 24 506 64T571 183Q575 206 575 410V598Q569 608 565 613T541 627T489 637H472V683H481Q496 680 598 680T715 683H724V637H707Q634 633 622 598L621 399Q620 194 617 180Q617 179 615 171Q595 83 531 31T389 -22Q304 -22 226 33T130 192Q129 201 128 412V622Z"></path><path id="MJX-76-TEX-N-31" d="M213 578L200 573Q186 568 160 563T102 556H83V602H102Q149 604 189 617T245 641T273 663Q275 666 285 666Q294 666 302 660V361L303 61Q310 54 315 52T339 48T401 46H427V0H416Q395 3 257 3Q121 3 100 0H88V46H114Q136 46 152 46T177 47T193 50T201 52T207 57T213 61V578Z"></path><path id="MJX-76-TEX-I-1D6FD" d="M29 -194Q23 -188 23 -186Q23 -183 102 134T186 465Q208 533 243 584T309 658Q365 705 429 705H431Q493 705 533 667T573 570Q573 465 469 396L482 383Q533 332 533 252Q533 139 448 65T257 -10Q227 -10 203 -2T165 17T143 40T131 59T126 65L62 -188Q60 -194 42 -194H29ZM353 431Q392 431 427 419L432 422Q436 426 439 429T449 439T461 453T472 471T484 495T493 524T501 560Q503 569 503 593Q503 611 502 616Q487 667 426 667Q384 667 347 643T286 582T247 514T224 455Q219 439 186 308T152 168Q151 163 151 147Q151 99 173 68Q204 26 260 26Q302 26 349 51T425 137Q441 171 449 214T457 279Q457 337 422 372Q380 358 347 358H337Q258 358 258 389Q258 396 261 403Q275 431 353 431Z"></path><path id="MJX-76-TEX-N-28" d="M94 250Q94 319 104 381T127 488T164 576T202 643T244 695T277 729T302 750H315H319Q333 750 333 741Q333 738 316 720T275 667T226 581T184 443T167 250T184 58T225 -81T274 -167T316 -220T333 -241Q333 -250 318 -250H315H302L274 -226Q180 -141 137 -14T94 250Z"></path><path id="MJX-76-TEX-I-1D462" d="M21 287Q21 295 30 318T55 370T99 420T158 442Q204 442 227 417T250 358Q250 340 216 246T182 105Q182 62 196 45T238 27T291 44T328 78L339 95Q341 99 377 247Q407 367 413 387T427 416Q444 431 463 431Q480 431 488 421T496 402L420 84Q419 79 419 68Q419 43 426 35T447 26Q469 29 482 57T512 145Q514 153 532 153Q551 153 551 144Q550 139 549 130T540 98T523 55T498 17T462 -8Q454 -10 438 -10Q372 -10 347 46Q345 45 336 36T318 21T296 6T267 -6T233 -11Q189 -11 155 7Q103 38 103 113Q103 170 138 262T173 379Q173 380 173 381Q173 390 173 393T169 400T158 404H154Q131 404 112 385T82 344T65 302T57 280Q55 278 41 278H27Q21 284 21 287Z"></path><path id="MJX-76-TEX-N-2212" d="M84 237T84 250T98 270H679Q694 262 694 250T679 230H98Q84 237 84 250Z"></path><path id="MJX-76-TEX-I-1D463" d="M173 380Q173 405 154 405Q130 405 104 376T61 287Q60 286 59 284T58 281T56 279T53 278T49 278T41 278H27Q21 284 21 287Q21 294 29 316T53 368T97 419T160 441Q202 441 225 417T249 361Q249 344 246 335Q246 329 231 291T200 202T182 113Q182 86 187 69Q200 26 250 26Q287 26 319 60T369 139T398 222T409 277Q409 300 401 317T383 343T365 361T357 383Q357 405 376 424T417 443Q436 443 451 425T467 367Q467 340 455 284T418 159T347 40T241 -11Q177 -11 139 22Q102 54 102 117Q102 148 110 181T151 298Q173 362 173 380Z"></path><path id="MJX-76-TEX-N-29" d="M60 749L64 750Q69 750 74 750H86L114 726Q208 641 251 514T294 250Q294 182 284 119T261 12T224 -76T186 -143T145 -194T113 -227T90 -246Q87 -249 86 -250H74Q66 -250 63 -250T58 -247T55 -238Q56 -237 66 -225Q221 -64 221 250T66 725Q56 737 55 738Q55 746 60 749Z"></path><path id="MJX-76-TEX-N-32" d="M109 429Q82 429 66 447T50 491Q50 562 103 614T235 666Q326 666 387 610T449 465Q449 422 429 383T381 315T301 241Q265 210 201 149L142 93L218 92Q375 92 385 97Q392 99 409 186V189H449V186Q448 183 436 95T421 3V0H50V19V31Q50 38 56 46T86 81Q115 113 136 137Q145 147 170 174T204 211T233 244T261 278T284 308T305 340T320 369T333 401T340 431T343 464Q343 527 309 573T212 619Q179 619 154 602T119 569T109 550Q109 549 114 549Q132 549 151 535T170 489Q170 464 154 447T109 429Z"></path><path id="MJX-76-TEX-N-33" d="M127 463Q100 463 85 480T69 524Q69 579 117 622T233 665Q268 665 277 664Q351 652 390 611T430 522Q430 470 396 421T302 350L299 348Q299 347 308 345T337 336T375 315Q457 262 457 175Q457 96 395 37T238 -22Q158 -22 100 21T42 130Q42 158 60 175T105 193Q133 193 151 175T169 130Q169 119 166 110T159 94T148 82T136 74T126 70T118 67L114 66Q165 21 238 21Q293 21 321 74Q338 107 338 175V195Q338 290 274 322Q259 328 213 329L171 330L168 332Q166 335 166 348Q166 366 174 366Q202 366 232 371Q266 376 294 413T322 525V533Q322 590 287 612Q265 626 240 626Q208 626 181 615T143 592T132 580H135Q138 579 143 578T153 573T165 566T175 555T183 540T186 520Q186 498 172 481T127 463Z"></path><path id="MJX-76-TEX-N-2E" d="M78 60Q78 84 95 102T138 120Q162 120 180 104T199 61Q199 36 182 18T139 0T96 17T78 60Z"></path><path id="MJX-76-TEX-S4-23AB" d="M170 875Q170 892 172 895T189 899H194H211L222 893Q345 826 420 715T503 476Q504 467 504 230Q504 51 504 21T499 -9H498Q496 -10 444 -10Q402 -10 394 -9T385 -4Q384 -2 384 240V311V366Q384 469 380 513T358 609Q342 657 319 698T271 767T227 812T189 843T171 856T170 875Z"></path><path id="MJX-76-TEX-S4-23AD" d="M384 -239V-57Q384 4 389 9Q391 10 455 10Q496 10 498 9Q501 8 502 5Q504 -5 504 -230Q504 -261 504 -311T505 -381Q505 -486 492 -551T435 -691Q357 -820 222 -893L211 -899H195Q176 -899 173 -896T170 -874Q170 -858 171 -855T184 -846Q262 -793 312 -709T378 -525Q378 -524 379 -522Q383 -493 384 -351Q384 -345 384 -334Q384 -276 384 -239Z"></path><path id="MJX-76-TEX-S4-23AC" d="M389 1159Q391 1160 455 1160Q496 1160 498 1159Q501 1158 502 1155Q504 1145 504 925V782Q504 676 511 616T546 490Q563 446 587 408T633 345T674 304T705 278T717 268Q718 267 718 250T717 232Q717 231 697 216T648 169T588 93T534 -24T505 -179Q504 -191 504 -425Q504 -600 504 -629T499 -659H498Q496 -660 444 -660T390 -659Q387 -658 386 -655Q384 -645 384 -424Q384 -191 385 -182Q394 -49 463 61T645 241L659 250L645 259Q539 325 467 434T385 682Q384 692 384 873Q384 1153 385 1155L389 1159Z"></path><path id="MJX-76-TEX-S4-23AA" d="M384 150V266Q384 304 389 309Q391 310 455 310Q496 310 498 309Q502 308 503 298Q504 283 504 150Q504 32 504 12T499 -9H498Q496 -10 444 -10T390 -9Q386 -8 385 2Q384 17 384 150Z"></path><path id="MJX-76-TEX-N-49" d="M328 0Q307 3 180 3T32 0H21V46H43Q92 46 106 49T126 60Q128 63 128 342Q128 620 126 623Q122 628 118 630T96 635T43 637H21V683H32Q53 680 180 680T328 683H339V637H317Q268 637 254 634T234 623Q232 620 232 342Q232 63 234 60Q238 55 242 53T264 48T317 46H339V0H328Z"></path></defs><g stroke="currentColor" fill="currentColor" stroke-width="0" transform="scale(1,-1)"><g ><g ><g transform="translate(0 250)"></g><g ><g transform="translate(0,3702)"><g ><g ><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-76-TEX-N-54"></use></g></g></g><g transform="translate(2186.6,0)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-76-TEX-N-3D"></use></g><g transform="translate(1055.8,0)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-76-TEX-N-50"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(1736.8,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-76-TEX-I-1D465"></use></g><g transform="translate(2531,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-76-TEX-N-2B"></use></g><g transform="translate(3531.2,0)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-76-TEX-N-53"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(4087.2,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-76-TEX-I-1D461"></use></g><g transform="translate(4448.2,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-76-TEX-N-2C"></use></g></g></g><g transform="translate(0,1592)"><g ><g ><g ><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-76-TEX-N-55"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(783,-150) scale(0.707)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-76-TEX-N-31"></use></g></g></g><g transform="translate(2186.6,0)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-76-TEX-N-3D"></use></g><g transform="translate(1055.8,0)"><g ><g transform="translate(220,710)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-76-TEX-I-1D6FD"></use></g><g transform="translate(566,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-76-TEX-N-28"></use></g><g transform="translate(955,0)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-76-TEX-I-1D462"></use></g><g transform="translate(605,-150) scale(0.707)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-76-TEX-N-31"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(2185.8,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-76-TEX-N-2212"></use></g><g transform="translate(3186,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-76-TEX-I-1D463"></use></g><g transform="translate(3671,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-76-TEX-N-29"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(516,-686)"><g ><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-76-TEX-N-50"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(681,0)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-76-TEX-I-1D462"></use></g><g transform="translate(605,-150) scale(0.707)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-76-TEX-N-31"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(1911.8,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-76-TEX-N-2B"></use></g><g transform="translate(2912,0)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-76-TEX-N-53"></use></g></g></g><rect width="4260" height="60" x="120" y="220"></rect></g></g><g transform="translate(5555.8,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-76-TEX-N-2C"></use></g></g></g><g transform="translate(0,-762)"><g ><g ><g ><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-76-TEX-N-55"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(783,-150) scale(0.707)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-76-TEX-N-32"></use></g></g></g><g transform="translate(2186.6,0)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-76-TEX-N-3D"></use></g><g transform="translate(1055.8,0)"><g ><g transform="translate(1449.7,676)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-76-TEX-I-1D462"></use></g><g transform="translate(605,-150) scale(0.707)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-76-TEX-N-32"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(220,-686)"><g ><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-76-TEX-N-50"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(681,0)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-76-TEX-I-1D462"></use></g><g transform="translate(605,-150) scale(0.707)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-76-TEX-N-31"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(1911.8,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-76-TEX-N-2B"></use></g><g transform="translate(2912,0)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-76-TEX-N-53"></use></g></g></g><rect width="3668" height="60" x="120" y="220"></rect></g></g><g transform="translate(4963.8,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-76-TEX-N-2C"></use></g></g></g><g transform="translate(0,-3116)"><g ><g ><g ><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-76-TEX-N-55"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(783,-150) scale(0.707)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-76-TEX-N-33"></use></g></g></g><g transform="translate(2186.6,0)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-76-TEX-N-3D"></use></g><g transform="translate(1055.8,0)"><g ><g transform="translate(1449.7,676)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-76-TEX-I-1D462"></use></g><g transform="translate(605,-150) scale(0.707)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-76-TEX-N-33"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(220,-686)"><g ><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-76-TEX-N-50"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(681,0)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-76-TEX-I-1D462"></use></g><g transform="translate(605,-150) scale(0.707)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-76-TEX-N-31"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(1911.8,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-76-TEX-N-2B"></use></g><g transform="translate(2912,0)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-76-TEX-N-53"></use></g></g></g><rect width="3668" height="60" x="120" y="220"></rect></g></g><g transform="translate(4963.8,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-76-TEX-N-2E"></use></g></g></g></g><g transform="translate(8020.3,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-76-TEX-S4-23AB" transform="translate(0,3553)"></use><use xlink:href="#MJX-76-TEX-S4-23AD" transform="translate(0,-3053)"></use><use xlink:href="#MJX-76-TEX-S4-23AC" transform="translate(0,0)"></use><svg width="889" height="2583" y="1060" x="0" viewBox="0 455.2 889 2583"><use xlink:href="#MJX-76-TEX-S4-23AA" transform="scale(1,12.703)"></use></svg><svg width="889" height="2583" y="-3143" x="0" viewBox="0 455.2 889 2583"><use xlink:href="#MJX-76-TEX-S4-23AA" transform="scale(1,12.703)"></use></svg></g></g><g transform="translate(8909.3,0)"><g ></g></g><g transform="translate(10909.3,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-76-TEX-N-28"></use><use xlink:href="#MJX-76-TEX-N-49" transform="translate(389,0)"></use><use xlink:href="#MJX-76-TEX-N-29" transform="translate(750,0)"></use></g></g></g></svg>
\ No newline at end of file diff --git a/77011-h/images/24.svg b/77011-h/images/24.svg new file mode 100644 index 0000000..70c4219 --- /dev/null +++ b/77011-h/images/24.svg @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +<svg version="1.1" style="vertical-align: -2.339ex;" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="11112px" height="2567.9px" viewBox="0 -1533.9 11112 2567.9" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><defs><path id="MJX-77-TEX-N-56" d="M114 620Q113 621 110 624T107 627T103 630T98 632T91 634T80 635T67 636T48 637H19V683H28Q46 680 152 680Q273 680 294 683H305V637H284Q223 634 223 620Q223 618 313 372T404 126L490 358Q575 588 575 597Q575 616 554 626T508 637H503V683H512Q527 680 627 680Q718 680 724 683H730V637H723Q648 637 627 596Q627 595 515 291T401 -14Q396 -22 382 -22H374H367Q353 -22 348 -14Q346 -12 231 303Q114 617 114 620Z"></path><path id="MJX-77-TEX-N-32" d="M109 429Q82 429 66 447T50 491Q50 562 103 614T235 666Q326 666 387 610T449 465Q449 422 429 383T381 315T301 241Q265 210 201 149L142 93L218 92Q375 92 385 97Q392 99 409 186V189H449V186Q448 183 436 95T421 3V0H50V19V31Q50 38 56 46T86 81Q115 113 136 137Q145 147 170 174T204 211T233 244T261 278T284 308T305 340T320 369T333 401T340 431T343 464Q343 527 309 573T212 619Q179 619 154 602T119 569T109 550Q109 549 114 549Q132 549 151 535T170 489Q170 464 154 447T109 429Z"></path><path id="MJX-77-TEX-N-3D" d="M56 347Q56 360 70 367H707Q722 359 722 347Q722 336 708 328L390 327H72Q56 332 56 347ZM56 153Q56 168 72 173H708Q722 163 722 153Q722 140 707 133H70Q56 140 56 153Z"></path><path id="MJX-77-TEX-I-1D462" d="M21 287Q21 295 30 318T55 370T99 420T158 442Q204 442 227 417T250 358Q250 340 216 246T182 105Q182 62 196 45T238 27T291 44T328 78L339 95Q341 99 377 247Q407 367 413 387T427 416Q444 431 463 431Q480 431 488 421T496 402L420 84Q419 79 419 68Q419 43 426 35T447 26Q469 29 482 57T512 145Q514 153 532 153Q551 153 551 144Q550 139 549 130T540 98T523 55T498 17T462 -8Q454 -10 438 -10Q372 -10 347 46Q345 45 336 36T318 21T296 6T267 -6T233 -11Q189 -11 155 7Q103 38 103 113Q103 170 138 262T173 379Q173 380 173 381Q173 390 173 393T169 400T158 404H154Q131 404 112 385T82 344T65 302T57 280Q55 278 41 278H27Q21 284 21 287Z"></path><path id="MJX-77-TEX-N-31" d="M213 578L200 573Q186 568 160 563T102 556H83V602H102Q149 604 189 617T245 641T273 663Q275 666 285 666Q294 666 302 660V361L303 61Q310 54 315 52T339 48T401 46H427V0H416Q395 3 257 3Q121 3 100 0H88V46H114Q136 46 152 46T177 47T193 50T201 52T207 57T213 61V578Z"></path><path id="MJX-77-TEX-N-2B" d="M56 237T56 250T70 270H369V420L370 570Q380 583 389 583Q402 583 409 568V270H707Q722 262 722 250T707 230H409V-68Q401 -82 391 -82H389H387Q375 -82 369 -68V230H70Q56 237 56 250Z"></path><path id="MJX-77-TEX-N-33" d="M127 463Q100 463 85 480T69 524Q69 579 117 622T233 665Q268 665 277 664Q351 652 390 611T430 522Q430 470 396 421T302 350L299 348Q299 347 308 345T337 336T375 315Q457 262 457 175Q457 96 395 37T238 -22Q158 -22 100 21T42 130Q42 158 60 175T105 193Q133 193 151 175T169 130Q169 119 166 110T159 94T148 82T136 74T126 70T118 67L114 66Q165 21 238 21Q293 21 321 74Q338 107 338 175V195Q338 290 274 322Q259 328 213 329L171 330L168 332Q166 335 166 348Q166 366 174 366Q202 366 232 371Q266 376 294 413T322 525V533Q322 590 287 612Q265 626 240 626Q208 626 181 615T143 592T132 580H135Q138 579 143 578T153 573T165 566T175 555T183 540T186 520Q186 498 172 481T127 463Z"></path><path id="MJX-77-TEX-N-2C" d="M78 35T78 60T94 103T137 121Q165 121 187 96T210 8Q210 -27 201 -60T180 -117T154 -158T130 -185T117 -194Q113 -194 104 -185T95 -172Q95 -168 106 -156T131 -126T157 -76T173 -3V9L172 8Q170 7 167 6T161 3T152 1T140 0Q113 0 96 17Z"></path><path id="MJX-77-TEX-V-2032" d="M79 43Q73 43 52 49T30 61Q30 68 85 293T146 528Q161 560 198 560Q218 560 240 545T262 501Q262 496 260 486Q259 479 173 263T84 45T79 43Z"></path><path id="MJX-77-TEX-N-55" d="M128 622Q121 629 117 631T101 634T58 637H25V683H36Q57 680 180 680Q315 680 324 683H335V637H302Q262 636 251 634T233 622L232 418V291Q232 189 240 145T280 67Q325 24 389 24Q454 24 506 64T571 183Q575 206 575 410V598Q569 608 565 613T541 627T489 637H472V683H481Q496 680 598 680T715 683H724V637H707Q634 633 622 598L621 399Q620 194 617 180Q617 179 615 171Q595 83 531 31T389 -22Q304 -22 226 33T130 192Q129 201 128 412V622Z"></path><path id="MJX-77-TEX-N-2E" d="M78 60Q78 84 95 102T138 120Q162 120 180 104T199 61Q199 36 182 18T139 0T96 17T78 60Z"></path></defs><g stroke="currentColor" fill="currentColor" stroke-width="0" transform="scale(1,-1)"><g ><g ><g transform="translate(0,700)"><g ><g ><g ><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-77-TEX-N-56"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(783,363) scale(0.707)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-77-TEX-N-32"></use></g></g></g><g transform="translate(2464,0)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-77-TEX-N-3D"></use></g><g transform="translate(1055.8,0)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-77-TEX-I-1D462"></use></g><g transform="translate(605,-150) scale(0.707)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-77-TEX-N-31"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(2064.3,0)"><g ><g ></g><g transform="translate(33,363) scale(0.707)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-77-TEX-N-32"></use></g></g></g><g transform="translate(2723.1,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-77-TEX-N-2B"></use></g><g transform="translate(3723.3,0)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-77-TEX-I-1D462"></use></g><g transform="translate(605,-150) scale(0.707)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-77-TEX-N-32"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(4731.9,0)"><g ><g ></g><g transform="translate(33,363) scale(0.707)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-77-TEX-N-32"></use></g></g></g><g transform="translate(5390.7,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-77-TEX-N-2B"></use></g><g transform="translate(6390.9,0)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-77-TEX-I-1D462"></use></g><g transform="translate(605,-150) scale(0.707)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-77-TEX-N-33"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(7399.4,0)"><g ><g ></g><g transform="translate(33,363) scale(0.707)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-77-TEX-N-32"></use></g></g></g><g transform="translate(7836,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-77-TEX-N-2C"></use></g></g></g><g transform="translate(0,-783.9)"><g ><g ><g ><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-77-TEX-N-56"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(783,363) scale(0.707)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-77-TEX-V-2032"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(1027.5,0)"><g ><g ></g><g transform="translate(33,363) scale(0.707)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-77-TEX-N-32"></use></g></g></g></g><g transform="translate(2464,0)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-77-TEX-N-3D"></use></g><g transform="translate(1055.8,0)"><g ><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-77-TEX-N-55"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(783,-150) scale(0.707)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-77-TEX-N-31"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(2242.3,0)"><g ><g ></g><g transform="translate(33,363) scale(0.707)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-77-TEX-N-32"></use></g></g></g><g transform="translate(2901.1,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-77-TEX-N-2B"></use></g><g transform="translate(3901.3,0)"><g ><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-77-TEX-N-55"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(783,-150) scale(0.707)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-77-TEX-N-32"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(5087.9,0)"><g ><g ></g><g transform="translate(33,363) scale(0.707)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-77-TEX-N-32"></use></g></g></g><g transform="translate(5746.7,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-77-TEX-N-2B"></use></g><g transform="translate(6746.9,0)"><g ><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-77-TEX-N-55"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(783,-150) scale(0.707)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-77-TEX-N-33"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(7933.4,0)"><g ><g ></g><g transform="translate(33,363) scale(0.707)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-77-TEX-N-32"></use></g></g></g><g transform="translate(8370,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-77-TEX-N-2E"></use></g></g></g></g></g></g></svg>
\ No newline at end of file diff --git a/77011-h/images/25.svg b/77011-h/images/25.svg new file mode 100644 index 0000000..ade5312 --- /dev/null +++ b/77011-h/images/25.svg @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +<svg version="1.1" style="vertical-align: -0.439ex;" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="14219.7px" height="888px" viewBox="0 -694 14219.7 888" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><defs><path id="MJX-78-TEX-I-1D462" d="M21 287Q21 295 30 318T55 370T99 420T158 442Q204 442 227 417T250 358Q250 340 216 246T182 105Q182 62 196 45T238 27T291 44T328 78L339 95Q341 99 377 247Q407 367 413 387T427 416Q444 431 463 431Q480 431 488 421T496 402L420 84Q419 79 419 68Q419 43 426 35T447 26Q469 29 482 57T512 145Q514 153 532 153Q551 153 551 144Q550 139 549 130T540 98T523 55T498 17T462 -8Q454 -10 438 -10Q372 -10 347 46Q345 45 336 36T318 21T296 6T267 -6T233 -11Q189 -11 155 7Q103 38 103 113Q103 170 138 262T173 379Q173 380 173 381Q173 390 173 393T169 400T158 404H154Q131 404 112 385T82 344T65 302T57 280Q55 278 41 278H27Q21 284 21 287Z"></path><path id="MJX-78-TEX-N-31" d="M213 578L200 573Q186 568 160 563T102 556H83V602H102Q149 604 189 617T245 641T273 663Q275 666 285 666Q294 666 302 660V361L303 61Q310 54 315 52T339 48T401 46H427V0H416Q395 3 257 3Q121 3 100 0H88V46H114Q136 46 152 46T177 47T193 50T201 52T207 57T213 61V578Z"></path><path id="MJX-78-TEX-N-3D" d="M56 347Q56 360 70 367H707Q722 359 722 347Q722 336 708 328L390 327H72Q56 332 56 347ZM56 153Q56 168 72 173H708Q722 163 722 153Q722 140 707 133H70Q56 140 56 153Z"></path><path id="MJX-78-TEX-I-1D459" d="M117 59Q117 26 142 26Q179 26 205 131Q211 151 215 152Q217 153 225 153H229Q238 153 241 153T246 151T248 144Q247 138 245 128T234 90T214 43T183 6T137 -11Q101 -11 70 11T38 85Q38 97 39 102L104 360Q167 615 167 623Q167 626 166 628T162 632T157 634T149 635T141 636T132 637T122 637Q112 637 109 637T101 638T95 641T94 647Q94 649 96 661Q101 680 107 682T179 688Q194 689 213 690T243 693T254 694Q266 694 266 686Q266 675 193 386T118 83Q118 81 118 75T117 65V59Z"></path><path id="MJX-78-TEX-N-56" d="M114 620Q113 621 110 624T107 627T103 630T98 632T91 634T80 635T67 636T48 637H19V683H28Q46 680 152 680Q273 680 294 683H305V637H284Q223 634 223 620Q223 618 313 372T404 126L490 358Q575 588 575 597Q575 616 554 626T508 637H503V683H512Q527 680 627 680Q718 680 724 683H730V637H723Q648 637 627 596Q627 595 515 291T401 -14Q396 -22 382 -22H374H367Q353 -22 348 -14Q346 -12 231 303Q114 617 114 620Z"></path><path id="MJX-78-TEX-N-2C" d="M78 35T78 60T94 103T137 121Q165 121 187 96T210 8Q210 -27 201 -60T180 -117T154 -158T130 -185T117 -194Q113 -194 104 -185T95 -172Q95 -168 106 -156T131 -126T157 -76T173 -3V9L172 8Q170 7 167 6T161 3T152 1T140 0Q113 0 96 17Z"></path><path id="MJX-78-TEX-N-32" d="M109 429Q82 429 66 447T50 491Q50 562 103 614T235 666Q326 666 387 610T449 465Q449 422 429 383T381 315T301 241Q265 210 201 149L142 93L218 92Q375 92 385 97Q392 99 409 186V189H449V186Q448 183 436 95T421 3V0H50V19V31Q50 38 56 46T86 81Q115 113 136 137Q145 147 170 174T204 211T233 244T261 278T284 308T305 340T320 369T333 401T340 431T343 464Q343 527 309 573T212 619Q179 619 154 602T119 569T109 550Q109 549 114 549Q132 549 151 535T170 489Q170 464 154 447T109 429Z"></path><path id="MJX-78-TEX-I-1D45A" d="M21 287Q22 293 24 303T36 341T56 388T88 425T132 442T175 435T205 417T221 395T229 376L231 369Q231 367 232 367L243 378Q303 442 384 442Q401 442 415 440T441 433T460 423T475 411T485 398T493 385T497 373T500 364T502 357L510 367Q573 442 659 442Q713 442 746 415T780 336Q780 285 742 178T704 50Q705 36 709 31T724 26Q752 26 776 56T815 138Q818 149 821 151T837 153Q857 153 857 145Q857 144 853 130Q845 101 831 73T785 17T716 -10Q669 -10 648 17T627 73Q627 92 663 193T700 345Q700 404 656 404H651Q565 404 506 303L499 291L466 157Q433 26 428 16Q415 -11 385 -11Q372 -11 364 -4T353 8T350 18Q350 29 384 161L420 307Q423 322 423 345Q423 404 379 404H374Q288 404 229 303L222 291L189 157Q156 26 151 16Q138 -11 108 -11Q95 -11 87 -5T76 7T74 17Q74 30 112 181Q151 335 151 342Q154 357 154 369Q154 405 129 405Q107 405 92 377T69 316T57 280Q55 278 41 278H27Q21 284 21 287Z"></path><path id="MJX-78-TEX-N-33" d="M127 463Q100 463 85 480T69 524Q69 579 117 622T233 665Q268 665 277 664Q351 652 390 611T430 522Q430 470 396 421T302 350L299 348Q299 347 308 345T337 336T375 315Q457 262 457 175Q457 96 395 37T238 -22Q158 -22 100 21T42 130Q42 158 60 175T105 193Q133 193 151 175T169 130Q169 119 166 110T159 94T148 82T136 74T126 70T118 67L114 66Q165 21 238 21Q293 21 321 74Q338 107 338 175V195Q338 290 274 322Q259 328 213 329L171 330L168 332Q166 335 166 348Q166 366 174 366Q202 366 232 371Q266 376 294 413T322 525V533Q322 590 287 612Q265 626 240 626Q208 626 181 615T143 592T132 580H135Q138 579 143 578T153 573T165 566T175 555T183 540T186 520Q186 498 172 481T127 463Z"></path><path id="MJX-78-TEX-I-1D45B" d="M21 287Q22 293 24 303T36 341T56 388T89 425T135 442Q171 442 195 424T225 390T231 369Q231 367 232 367L243 378Q304 442 382 442Q436 442 469 415T503 336T465 179T427 52Q427 26 444 26Q450 26 453 27Q482 32 505 65T540 145Q542 153 560 153Q580 153 580 145Q580 144 576 130Q568 101 554 73T508 17T439 -10Q392 -10 371 17T350 73Q350 92 386 193T423 345Q423 404 379 404H374Q288 404 229 303L222 291L189 157Q156 26 151 16Q138 -11 108 -11Q95 -11 87 -5T76 7T74 17Q74 30 112 180T152 343Q153 348 153 366Q153 405 129 405Q91 405 66 305Q60 285 60 284Q58 278 41 278H27Q21 284 21 287Z"></path></defs><g stroke="currentColor" fill="currentColor" stroke-width="0" transform="scale(1,-1)"><g ><g ><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-78-TEX-I-1D462"></use></g><g transform="translate(605,-150) scale(0.707)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-78-TEX-N-31"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(1286.3,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-78-TEX-N-3D"></use></g><g transform="translate(2342.1,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-78-TEX-I-1D459"></use></g><g transform="translate(2640.1,0)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-78-TEX-N-56"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(3390.1,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-78-TEX-N-2C"></use></g><g transform="translate(3668.1,0)"><g ></g></g><g transform="translate(4834.8,0)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-78-TEX-I-1D462"></use></g><g transform="translate(605,-150) scale(0.707)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-78-TEX-N-32"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(6121.1,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-78-TEX-N-3D"></use></g><g transform="translate(7176.9,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-78-TEX-I-1D45A"></use></g><g transform="translate(8054.9,0)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-78-TEX-N-56"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(8804.9,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-78-TEX-N-2C"></use></g><g transform="translate(9082.9,0)"><g ></g></g><g transform="translate(10249.6,0)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-78-TEX-I-1D462"></use></g><g transform="translate(605,-150) scale(0.707)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-78-TEX-N-33"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(11535.9,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-78-TEX-N-3D"></use></g><g transform="translate(12591.7,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-78-TEX-I-1D45B"></use></g><g transform="translate(13191.7,0)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-78-TEX-N-56"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(13941.7,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-78-TEX-N-2C"></use></g></g></g></svg>
\ No newline at end of file diff --git a/77011-h/images/26.svg b/77011-h/images/26.svg new file mode 100644 index 0000000..292b7fc --- /dev/null +++ b/77011-h/images/26.svg @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +<svg version="1.1" style="vertical-align: -0.186ex;" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="7642.1px" height="965.9px" viewBox="0 -883.9 7642.1 965.9" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><defs><path id="MJX-79-TEX-I-1D459" d="M117 59Q117 26 142 26Q179 26 205 131Q211 151 215 152Q217 153 225 153H229Q238 153 241 153T246 151T248 144Q247 138 245 128T234 90T214 43T183 6T137 -11Q101 -11 70 11T38 85Q38 97 39 102L104 360Q167 615 167 623Q167 626 166 628T162 632T157 634T149 635T141 636T132 637T122 637Q112 637 109 637T101 638T95 641T94 647Q94 649 96 661Q101 680 107 682T179 688Q194 689 213 690T243 693T254 694Q266 694 266 686Q266 675 193 386T118 83Q118 81 118 75T117 65V59Z"></path><path id="MJX-79-TEX-N-32" d="M109 429Q82 429 66 447T50 491Q50 562 103 614T235 666Q326 666 387 610T449 465Q449 422 429 383T381 315T301 241Q265 210 201 149L142 93L218 92Q375 92 385 97Q392 99 409 186V189H449V186Q448 183 436 95T421 3V0H50V19V31Q50 38 56 46T86 81Q115 113 136 137Q145 147 170 174T204 211T233 244T261 278T284 308T305 340T320 369T333 401T340 431T343 464Q343 527 309 573T212 619Q179 619 154 602T119 569T109 550Q109 549 114 549Q132 549 151 535T170 489Q170 464 154 447T109 429Z"></path><path id="MJX-79-TEX-N-2B" d="M56 237T56 250T70 270H369V420L370 570Q380 583 389 583Q402 583 409 568V270H707Q722 262 722 250T707 230H409V-68Q401 -82 391 -82H389H387Q375 -82 369 -68V230H70Q56 237 56 250Z"></path><path id="MJX-79-TEX-I-1D45A" d="M21 287Q22 293 24 303T36 341T56 388T88 425T132 442T175 435T205 417T221 395T229 376L231 369Q231 367 232 367L243 378Q303 442 384 442Q401 442 415 440T441 433T460 423T475 411T485 398T493 385T497 373T500 364T502 357L510 367Q573 442 659 442Q713 442 746 415T780 336Q780 285 742 178T704 50Q705 36 709 31T724 26Q752 26 776 56T815 138Q818 149 821 151T837 153Q857 153 857 145Q857 144 853 130Q845 101 831 73T785 17T716 -10Q669 -10 648 17T627 73Q627 92 663 193T700 345Q700 404 656 404H651Q565 404 506 303L499 291L466 157Q433 26 428 16Q415 -11 385 -11Q372 -11 364 -4T353 8T350 18Q350 29 384 161L420 307Q423 322 423 345Q423 404 379 404H374Q288 404 229 303L222 291L189 157Q156 26 151 16Q138 -11 108 -11Q95 -11 87 -5T76 7T74 17Q74 30 112 181Q151 335 151 342Q154 357 154 369Q154 405 129 405Q107 405 92 377T69 316T57 280Q55 278 41 278H27Q21 284 21 287Z"></path><path id="MJX-79-TEX-I-1D45B" d="M21 287Q22 293 24 303T36 341T56 388T89 425T135 442Q171 442 195 424T225 390T231 369Q231 367 232 367L243 378Q304 442 382 442Q436 442 469 415T503 336T465 179T427 52Q427 26 444 26Q450 26 453 27Q482 32 505 65T540 145Q542 153 560 153Q580 153 580 145Q580 144 576 130Q568 101 554 73T508 17T439 -10Q392 -10 371 17T350 73Q350 92 386 193T423 345Q423 404 379 404H374Q288 404 229 303L222 291L189 157Q156 26 151 16Q138 -11 108 -11Q95 -11 87 -5T76 7T74 17Q74 30 112 180T152 343Q153 348 153 366Q153 405 129 405Q91 405 66 305Q60 285 60 284Q58 278 41 278H27Q21 284 21 287Z"></path><path id="MJX-79-TEX-N-3D" d="M56 347Q56 360 70 367H707Q722 359 722 347Q722 336 708 328L390 327H72Q56 332 56 347ZM56 153Q56 168 72 173H708Q722 163 722 153Q722 140 707 133H70Q56 140 56 153Z"></path><path id="MJX-79-TEX-N-31" d="M213 578L200 573Q186 568 160 563T102 556H83V602H102Q149 604 189 617T245 641T273 663Q275 666 285 666Q294 666 302 660V361L303 61Q310 54 315 52T339 48T401 46H427V0H416Q395 3 257 3Q121 3 100 0H88V46H114Q136 46 152 46T177 47T193 50T201 52T207 57T213 61V578Z"></path><path id="MJX-79-TEX-N-2E" d="M78 60Q78 84 95 102T138 120Q162 120 180 104T199 61Q199 36 182 18T139 0T96 17T78 60Z"></path></defs><g stroke="currentColor" fill="currentColor" stroke-width="0" transform="scale(1,-1)"><g ><g ><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-79-TEX-I-1D459"></use></g><g transform="translate(331,413) scale(0.707)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-79-TEX-N-32"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(956.8,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-79-TEX-N-2B"></use></g><g transform="translate(1957,0)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-79-TEX-I-1D45A"></use></g><g transform="translate(911,413) scale(0.707)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-79-TEX-N-32"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(3493.8,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-79-TEX-N-2B"></use></g><g transform="translate(4494,0)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-79-TEX-I-1D45B"></use></g><g transform="translate(633,413) scale(0.707)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-79-TEX-N-32"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(5808.3,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-79-TEX-N-3D"></use></g><g transform="translate(6864.1,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-79-TEX-N-31"></use><use xlink:href="#MJX-79-TEX-N-2E" transform="translate(500,0)"></use></g></g></g></svg>
\ No newline at end of file diff --git a/77011-h/images/27.svg b/77011-h/images/27.svg new file mode 100644 index 0000000..f147bb6 --- /dev/null +++ b/77011-h/images/27.svg @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +<svg version="1.1" style="vertical-align: -2.194ex;" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="18753.2px" height="2513.9px" viewBox="0 -1543.9 18753.2 2513.9" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><defs><path id="MJX-80-TEX-N-56" d="M114 620Q113 621 110 624T107 627T103 630T98 632T91 634T80 635T67 636T48 637H19V683H28Q46 680 152 680Q273 680 294 683H305V637H284Q223 634 223 620Q223 618 313 372T404 126L490 358Q575 588 575 597Q575 616 554 626T508 637H503V683H512Q527 680 627 680Q718 680 724 683H730V637H723Q648 637 627 596Q627 595 515 291T401 -14Q396 -22 382 -22H374H367Q353 -22 348 -14Q346 -12 231 303Q114 617 114 620Z"></path><path id="MJX-80-TEX-V-2032" d="M79 43Q73 43 52 49T30 61Q30 68 85 293T146 528Q161 560 198 560Q218 560 240 545T262 501Q262 496 260 486Q259 479 173 263T84 45T79 43Z"></path><path id="MJX-80-TEX-N-32" d="M109 429Q82 429 66 447T50 491Q50 562 103 614T235 666Q326 666 387 610T449 465Q449 422 429 383T381 315T301 241Q265 210 201 149L142 93L218 92Q375 92 385 97Q392 99 409 186V189H449V186Q448 183 436 95T421 3V0H50V19V31Q50 38 56 46T86 81Q115 113 136 137Q145 147 170 174T204 211T233 244T261 278T284 308T305 340T320 369T333 401T340 431T343 464Q343 527 309 573T212 619Q179 619 154 602T119 569T109 550Q109 549 114 549Q132 549 151 535T170 489Q170 464 154 447T109 429Z"></path><path id="MJX-80-TEX-N-3D" d="M56 347Q56 360 70 367H707Q722 359 722 347Q722 336 708 328L390 327H72Q56 332 56 347ZM56 153Q56 168 72 173H708Q722 163 722 153Q722 140 707 133H70Q56 140 56 153Z"></path><path id="MJX-80-TEX-N-28" d="M94 250Q94 319 104 381T127 488T164 576T202 643T244 695T277 729T302 750H315H319Q333 750 333 741Q333 738 316 720T275 667T226 581T184 443T167 250T184 58T225 -81T274 -167T316 -220T333 -241Q333 -250 318 -250H315H302L274 -226Q180 -141 137 -14T94 250Z"></path><path id="MJX-80-TEX-I-1D6FD" d="M29 -194Q23 -188 23 -186Q23 -183 102 134T186 465Q208 533 243 584T309 658Q365 705 429 705H431Q493 705 533 667T573 570Q573 465 469 396L482 383Q533 332 533 252Q533 139 448 65T257 -10Q227 -10 203 -2T165 17T143 40T131 59T126 65L62 -188Q60 -194 42 -194H29ZM353 431Q392 431 427 419L432 422Q436 426 439 429T449 439T461 453T472 471T484 495T493 524T501 560Q503 569 503 593Q503 611 502 616Q487 667 426 667Q384 667 347 643T286 582T247 514T224 455Q219 439 186 308T152 168Q151 163 151 147Q151 99 173 68Q204 26 260 26Q302 26 349 51T425 137Q441 171 449 214T457 279Q457 337 422 372Q380 358 347 358H337Q258 358 258 389Q258 396 261 403Q275 431 353 431Z"></path><path id="MJX-80-TEX-N-2212" d="M84 237T84 250T98 270H679Q694 262 694 250T679 230H98Q84 237 84 250Z"></path><path id="MJX-80-TEX-N-31" d="M213 578L200 573Q186 568 160 563T102 556H83V602H102Q149 604 189 617T245 641T273 663Q275 666 285 666Q294 666 302 660V361L303 61Q310 54 315 52T339 48T401 46H427V0H416Q395 3 257 3Q121 3 100 0H88V46H114Q136 46 152 46T177 47T193 50T201 52T207 57T213 61V578Z"></path><path id="MJX-80-TEX-N-29" d="M60 749L64 750Q69 750 74 750H86L114 726Q208 641 251 514T294 250Q294 182 284 119T261 12T224 -76T186 -143T145 -194T113 -227T90 -246Q87 -249 86 -250H74Q66 -250 63 -250T58 -247T55 -238Q56 -237 66 -225Q221 -64 221 250T66 725Q56 737 55 738Q55 746 60 749Z"></path><path id="MJX-80-TEX-I-1D459" d="M117 59Q117 26 142 26Q179 26 205 131Q211 151 215 152Q217 153 225 153H229Q238 153 241 153T246 151T248 144Q247 138 245 128T234 90T214 43T183 6T137 -11Q101 -11 70 11T38 85Q38 97 39 102L104 360Q167 615 167 623Q167 626 166 628T162 632T157 634T149 635T141 636T132 637T122 637Q112 637 109 637T101 638T95 641T94 647Q94 649 96 661Q101 680 107 682T179 688Q194 689 213 690T243 693T254 694Q266 694 266 686Q266 675 193 386T118 83Q118 81 118 75T117 65V59Z"></path><path id="MJX-80-TEX-I-1D463" d="M173 380Q173 405 154 405Q130 405 104 376T61 287Q60 286 59 284T58 281T56 279T53 278T49 278T41 278H27Q21 284 21 287Q21 294 29 316T53 368T97 419T160 441Q202 441 225 417T249 361Q249 344 246 335Q246 329 231 291T200 202T182 113Q182 86 187 69Q200 26 250 26Q287 26 319 60T369 139T398 222T409 277Q409 300 401 317T383 343T365 361T357 383Q357 405 376 424T417 443Q436 443 451 425T467 367Q467 340 455 284T418 159T347 40T241 -11Q177 -11 139 22Q102 54 102 117Q102 148 110 181T151 298Q173 362 173 380Z"></path><path id="MJX-80-TEX-N-2B" d="M56 237T56 250T70 270H369V420L370 570Q380 583 389 583Q402 583 409 568V270H707Q722 262 722 250T707 230H409V-68Q401 -82 391 -82H389H387Q375 -82 369 -68V230H70Q56 237 56 250Z"></path><path id="MJX-80-TEX-N-50" d="M130 622Q123 629 119 631T103 634T60 637H27V683H214Q237 683 276 683T331 684Q419 684 471 671T567 616Q624 563 624 489Q624 421 573 372T451 307Q429 302 328 301H234V181Q234 62 237 58Q245 47 304 46H337V0H326Q305 3 182 3Q47 3 38 0H27V46H60Q102 47 111 49T130 61V622ZM507 488Q507 514 506 528T500 564T483 597T450 620T397 635Q385 637 307 637H286Q237 637 234 628Q231 624 231 483V342H302H339Q390 342 423 349T481 382Q507 411 507 488Z"></path><path id="MJX-80-TEX-N-53" d="M55 507Q55 590 112 647T243 704H257Q342 704 405 641L426 672Q431 679 436 687T446 700L449 704Q450 704 453 704T459 705H463Q466 705 472 699V462L466 456H448Q437 456 435 459T430 479Q413 605 329 646Q292 662 254 662Q201 662 168 626T135 542Q135 508 152 480T200 435Q210 431 286 412T370 389Q427 367 463 314T500 191Q500 110 448 45T301 -21Q245 -21 201 -4T140 27L122 41Q118 36 107 21T87 -7T78 -21Q76 -22 68 -22H64Q61 -22 55 -16V101Q55 220 56 222Q58 227 76 227H89Q95 221 95 214Q95 182 105 151T139 90T205 42T305 24Q352 24 386 62T420 155Q420 198 398 233T340 281Q284 295 266 300Q261 301 239 306T206 314T174 325T141 343T112 367T85 402Q55 451 55 507Z"></path><path id="MJX-80-TEX-N-2E" d="M78 60Q78 84 95 102T138 120Q162 120 180 104T199 61Q199 36 182 18T139 0T96 17T78 60Z"></path></defs><g stroke="currentColor" fill="currentColor" stroke-width="0" transform="scale(1,-1)"><g ><g ><g ><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-80-TEX-N-56"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(783,413) scale(0.707)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-80-TEX-V-2032"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(1027.5,0)"><g ><g ></g><g transform="translate(33,413) scale(0.707)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-80-TEX-N-32"></use></g></g></g><g transform="translate(1741.8,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-80-TEX-N-3D"></use></g><g transform="translate(2797.6,0)"><g transform="translate(220,710)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-80-TEX-N-28"></use></g><g transform="translate(389,0)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-80-TEX-I-1D6FD"></use></g><g transform="translate(599,363) scale(0.707)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-80-TEX-N-32"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(1613.8,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-80-TEX-N-2212"></use></g><g transform="translate(2614,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-80-TEX-N-31"></use></g><g transform="translate(3114,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-80-TEX-N-29"></use></g><g transform="translate(3503,0)"><g ><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-80-TEX-N-56"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(783,363) scale(0.707)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-80-TEX-N-32"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(4689.6,0)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-80-TEX-I-1D459"></use></g><g transform="translate(331,363) scale(0.707)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-80-TEX-N-32"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(5646.3,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-80-TEX-N-2212"></use></g><g transform="translate(6646.5,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-80-TEX-N-32"></use></g><g transform="translate(7146.5,0)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-80-TEX-I-1D6FD"></use></g><g transform="translate(599,363) scale(0.707)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-80-TEX-N-32"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(8149.1,0)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-80-TEX-N-56"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(8899.1,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-80-TEX-I-1D463"></use></g><g transform="translate(9384.1,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-80-TEX-I-1D459"></use></g><g transform="translate(9904.3,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-80-TEX-N-2B"></use></g><g transform="translate(10904.5,0)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-80-TEX-I-1D6FD"></use></g><g transform="translate(599,363) scale(0.707)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-80-TEX-N-32"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(11907.1,0)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-80-TEX-I-1D463"></use></g><g transform="translate(518,363) scale(0.707)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-80-TEX-N-32"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(13050.9,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-80-TEX-N-2B"></use></g><g transform="translate(14051.1,0)"><g ><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-80-TEX-N-56"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(783,363) scale(0.707)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-80-TEX-N-32"></use></g></g></g><g transform="translate(5477.8,-719.9)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-80-TEX-N-28"></use></g><g transform="translate(389,0)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-80-TEX-N-50"></use><use xlink:href="#MJX-80-TEX-N-56" transform="translate(681,0)"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(1820,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-80-TEX-I-1D459"></use></g><g transform="translate(2340.2,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-80-TEX-N-2B"></use></g><g transform="translate(3340.4,0)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-80-TEX-N-53"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(3896.4,0)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-80-TEX-N-29"></use></g><g transform="translate(422,289) scale(0.707)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-80-TEX-N-32"></use></g></g></g><rect width="15437.7" height="60" x="120" y="220"></rect></g><g transform="translate(18475.2,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-80-TEX-N-2E"></use></g></g></g></svg>
\ No newline at end of file diff --git a/77011-h/images/28.svg b/77011-h/images/28.svg new file mode 100644 index 0000000..12fdbb6 --- /dev/null +++ b/77011-h/images/28.svg @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +<svg version="1.1" style="vertical-align: -2.194ex;" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="6741.1px" height="2479.9px" viewBox="0 -1509.9 6741.1 2479.9" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><defs><path id="MJX-81-TEX-N-56" d="M114 620Q113 621 110 624T107 627T103 630T98 632T91 634T80 635T67 636T48 637H19V683H28Q46 680 152 680Q273 680 294 683H305V637H284Q223 634 223 620Q223 618 313 372T404 126L490 358Q575 588 575 597Q575 616 554 626T508 637H503V683H512Q527 680 627 680Q718 680 724 683H730V637H723Q648 637 627 596Q627 595 515 291T401 -14Q396 -22 382 -22H374H367Q353 -22 348 -14Q346 -12 231 303Q114 617 114 620Z"></path><path id="MJX-81-TEX-N-32" d="M109 429Q82 429 66 447T50 491Q50 562 103 614T235 666Q326 666 387 610T449 465Q449 422 429 383T381 315T301 241Q265 210 201 149L142 93L218 92Q375 92 385 97Q392 99 409 186V189H449V186Q448 183 436 95T421 3V0H50V19V31Q50 38 56 46T86 81Q115 113 136 137Q145 147 170 174T204 211T233 244T261 278T284 308T305 340T320 369T333 401T340 431T343 464Q343 527 309 573T212 619Q179 619 154 602T119 569T109 550Q109 549 114 549Q132 549 151 535T170 489Q170 464 154 447T109 429Z"></path><path id="MJX-81-TEX-N-3D" d="M56 347Q56 360 70 367H707Q722 359 722 347Q722 336 708 328L390 327H72Q56 332 56 347ZM56 153Q56 168 72 173H708Q722 163 722 153Q722 140 707 133H70Q56 140 56 153Z"></path><path id="MJX-81-TEX-I-1D6FD" d="M29 -194Q23 -188 23 -186Q23 -183 102 134T186 465Q208 533 243 584T309 658Q365 705 429 705H431Q493 705 533 667T573 570Q573 465 469 396L482 383Q533 332 533 252Q533 139 448 65T257 -10Q227 -10 203 -2T165 17T143 40T131 59T126 65L62 -188Q60 -194 42 -194H29ZM353 431Q392 431 427 419L432 422Q436 426 439 429T449 439T461 453T472 471T484 495T493 524T501 560Q503 569 503 593Q503 611 502 616Q487 667 426 667Q384 667 347 643T286 582T247 514T224 455Q219 439 186 308T152 168Q151 163 151 147Q151 99 173 68Q204 26 260 26Q302 26 349 51T425 137Q441 171 449 214T457 279Q457 337 422 372Q380 358 347 358H337Q258 358 258 389Q258 396 261 403Q275 431 353 431Z"></path><path id="MJX-81-TEX-I-1D463" d="M173 380Q173 405 154 405Q130 405 104 376T61 287Q60 286 59 284T58 281T56 279T53 278T49 278T41 278H27Q21 284 21 287Q21 294 29 316T53 368T97 419T160 441Q202 441 225 417T249 361Q249 344 246 335Q246 329 231 291T200 202T182 113Q182 86 187 69Q200 26 250 26Q287 26 319 60T369 139T398 222T409 277Q409 300 401 317T383 343T365 361T357 383Q357 405 376 424T417 443Q436 443 451 425T467 367Q467 340 455 284T418 159T347 40T241 -11Q177 -11 139 22Q102 54 102 117Q102 148 110 181T151 298Q173 362 173 380Z"></path><path id="MJX-81-TEX-N-28" d="M94 250Q94 319 104 381T127 488T164 576T202 643T244 695T277 729T302 750H315H319Q333 750 333 741Q333 738 316 720T275 667T226 581T184 443T167 250T184 58T225 -81T274 -167T316 -220T333 -241Q333 -250 318 -250H315H302L274 -226Q180 -141 137 -14T94 250Z"></path><path id="MJX-81-TEX-N-2212" d="M84 237T84 250T98 270H679Q694 262 694 250T679 230H98Q84 237 84 250Z"></path><path id="MJX-81-TEX-N-31" d="M213 578L200 573Q186 568 160 563T102 556H83V602H102Q149 604 189 617T245 641T273 663Q275 666 285 666Q294 666 302 660V361L303 61Q310 54 315 52T339 48T401 46H427V0H416Q395 3 257 3Q121 3 100 0H88V46H114Q136 46 152 46T177 47T193 50T201 52T207 57T213 61V578Z"></path><path id="MJX-81-TEX-N-29" d="M60 749L64 750Q69 750 74 750H86L114 726Q208 641 251 514T294 250Q294 182 284 119T261 12T224 -76T186 -143T145 -194T113 -227T90 -246Q87 -249 86 -250H74Q66 -250 63 -250T58 -247T55 -238Q56 -237 66 -225Q221 -64 221 250T66 725Q56 737 55 738Q55 746 60 749Z"></path><path id="MJX-81-TEX-N-2C" d="M78 35T78 60T94 103T137 121Q165 121 187 96T210 8Q210 -27 201 -60T180 -117T154 -158T130 -185T117 -194Q113 -194 104 -185T95 -172Q95 -168 106 -156T131 -126T157 -76T173 -3V9L172 8Q170 7 167 6T161 3T152 1T140 0Q113 0 96 17Z"></path></defs><g stroke="currentColor" fill="currentColor" stroke-width="0" transform="scale(1,-1)"><g ><g ><g ><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-81-TEX-N-56"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(783,413) scale(0.707)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-81-TEX-N-32"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(1464.3,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-81-TEX-N-3D"></use></g><g transform="translate(2520.1,0)"><g transform="translate(1009.4,676)"><g ><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-81-TEX-I-1D6FD"></use></g><g transform="translate(599,363) scale(0.707)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-81-TEX-N-32"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(1002.6,0)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-81-TEX-I-1D463"></use></g><g transform="translate(518,363) scale(0.707)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-81-TEX-N-32"></use></g></g></g><g transform="translate(220,-719.9)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-81-TEX-N-28"></use></g><g transform="translate(389,0)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-81-TEX-I-1D6FD"></use></g><g transform="translate(599,289) scale(0.707)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-81-TEX-N-32"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(1613.8,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-81-TEX-N-2212"></use></g><g transform="translate(2614,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-81-TEX-N-31"></use></g><g transform="translate(3114,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-81-TEX-N-29"></use></g></g><rect width="3703" height="60" x="120" y="220"></rect></g><g transform="translate(6463.1,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-81-TEX-N-2C"></use></g></g></g></svg>
\ No newline at end of file diff --git a/77011-h/images/29.svg b/77011-h/images/29.svg new file mode 100644 index 0000000..b55c2e1 --- /dev/null +++ b/77011-h/images/29.svg @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +<svg version="1.1" style="vertical-align: -3.98ex;" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="7249.6px" height="3101px" viewBox="0 -1342 7249.6 3101" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><defs><path id="MJX-82-TEX-I-1D6FD" d="M29 -194Q23 -188 23 -186Q23 -183 102 134T186 465Q208 533 243 584T309 658Q365 705 429 705H431Q493 705 533 667T573 570Q573 465 469 396L482 383Q533 332 533 252Q533 139 448 65T257 -10Q227 -10 203 -2T165 17T143 40T131 59T126 65L62 -188Q60 -194 42 -194H29ZM353 431Q392 431 427 419L432 422Q436 426 439 429T449 439T461 453T472 471T484 495T493 524T501 560Q503 569 503 593Q503 611 502 616Q487 667 426 667Q384 667 347 643T286 582T247 514T224 455Q219 439 186 308T152 168Q151 163 151 147Q151 99 173 68Q204 26 260 26Q302 26 349 51T425 137Q441 171 449 214T457 279Q457 337 422 372Q380 358 347 358H337Q258 358 258 389Q258 396 261 403Q275 431 353 431Z"></path><path id="MJX-82-TEX-N-32" d="M109 429Q82 429 66 447T50 491Q50 562 103 614T235 666Q326 666 387 610T449 465Q449 422 429 383T381 315T301 241Q265 210 201 149L142 93L218 92Q375 92 385 97Q392 99 409 186V189H449V186Q448 183 436 95T421 3V0H50V19V31Q50 38 56 46T86 81Q115 113 136 137Q145 147 170 174T204 211T233 244T261 278T284 308T305 340T320 369T333 401T340 431T343 464Q343 527 309 573T212 619Q179 619 154 602T119 569T109 550Q109 549 114 549Q132 549 151 535T170 489Q170 464 154 447T109 429Z"></path><path id="MJX-82-TEX-N-3D" d="M56 347Q56 360 70 367H707Q722 359 722 347Q722 336 708 328L390 327H72Q56 332 56 347ZM56 153Q56 168 72 173H708Q722 163 722 153Q722 140 707 133H70Q56 140 56 153Z"></path><path id="MJX-82-TEX-N-31" d="M213 578L200 573Q186 568 160 563T102 556H83V602H102Q149 604 189 617T245 641T273 663Q275 666 285 666Q294 666 302 660V361L303 61Q310 54 315 52T339 48T401 46H427V0H416Q395 3 257 3Q121 3 100 0H88V46H114Q136 46 152 46T177 47T193 50T201 52T207 57T213 61V578Z"></path><path id="MJX-82-TEX-LO-28" d="M180 96T180 250T205 541T266 770T353 944T444 1069T527 1150H555Q561 1144 561 1141Q561 1137 545 1120T504 1072T447 995T386 878T330 721T288 513T272 251Q272 133 280 56Q293 -87 326 -209T399 -405T475 -531T536 -609T561 -640Q561 -643 555 -649H527Q483 -612 443 -568T353 -443T266 -270T205 -41Z"></path><path id="MJX-82-TEX-N-2212" d="M84 237T84 250T98 270H679Q694 262 694 250T679 230H98Q84 237 84 250Z"></path><path id="MJX-82-TEX-I-1D463" d="M173 380Q173 405 154 405Q130 405 104 376T61 287Q60 286 59 284T58 281T56 279T53 278T49 278T41 278H27Q21 284 21 287Q21 294 29 316T53 368T97 419T160 441Q202 441 225 417T249 361Q249 344 246 335Q246 329 231 291T200 202T182 113Q182 86 187 69Q200 26 250 26Q287 26 319 60T369 139T398 222T409 277Q409 300 401 317T383 343T365 361T357 383Q357 405 376 424T417 443Q436 443 451 425T467 367Q467 340 455 284T418 159T347 40T241 -11Q177 -11 139 22Q102 54 102 117Q102 148 110 181T151 298Q173 362 173 380Z"></path><path id="MJX-82-TEX-N-56" d="M114 620Q113 621 110 624T107 627T103 630T98 632T91 634T80 635T67 636T48 637H19V683H28Q46 680 152 680Q273 680 294 683H305V637H284Q223 634 223 620Q223 618 313 372T404 126L490 358Q575 588 575 597Q575 616 554 626T508 637H503V683H512Q527 680 627 680Q718 680 724 683H730V637H723Q648 637 627 596Q627 595 515 291T401 -14Q396 -22 382 -22H374H367Q353 -22 348 -14Q346 -12 231 303Q114 617 114 620Z"></path><path id="MJX-82-TEX-LO-29" d="M35 1138Q35 1150 51 1150H56H69Q113 1113 153 1069T243 944T330 771T391 541T416 250T391 -40T330 -270T243 -443T152 -568T69 -649H56Q43 -649 39 -647T35 -637Q65 -607 110 -548Q283 -316 316 56Q324 133 324 251Q324 368 316 445Q278 877 48 1123Q36 1137 35 1138Z"></path><path id="MJX-82-TEX-N-2E" d="M78 60Q78 84 95 102T138 120Q162 120 180 104T199 61Q199 36 182 18T139 0T96 17T78 60Z"></path></defs><g stroke="currentColor" fill="currentColor" stroke-width="0" transform="scale(1,-1)"><g ><g ><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-82-TEX-I-1D6FD"></use></g><g transform="translate(599,413) scale(0.707)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-82-TEX-N-32"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(1280.3,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-82-TEX-N-3D"></use></g><g transform="translate(2336.1,0)"><g transform="translate(2067.7,676)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-82-TEX-N-31"></use></g><g transform="translate(220,-1109.5)"><g transform="translate(0 -0.5)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-82-TEX-LO-28"></use></g><g transform="translate(597,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-82-TEX-N-31"></use></g><g transform="translate(1319.2,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-82-TEX-N-2212"></use></g><g transform="translate(2319.4,0)"><g ><g transform="translate(313.7,394) scale(0.707)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-82-TEX-I-1D463"></use></g><g transform="translate(518,363) scale(0.707)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-82-TEX-N-32"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(220,-377.4) scale(0.707)"><g ><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-82-TEX-N-56"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(783,289) scale(0.707)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-82-TEX-N-32"></use></g></g><rect width="1039" height="60" x="120" y="220"></rect></g></g><g transform="translate(3598.5,0) translate(0 -0.5)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-82-TEX-LO-29"></use></g></g><rect width="4395.5" height="60" x="120" y="220"></rect></g><g transform="translate(6971.6,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-82-TEX-N-2E"></use></g></g></g></svg>
\ No newline at end of file diff --git a/77011-h/images/3.svg b/77011-h/images/3.svg new file mode 100644 index 0000000..0a07feb --- /dev/null +++ b/77011-h/images/3.svg @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +<svg version="1.1" style="vertical-align: -0.025ex;" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="640px" height="453px" viewBox="0 -442 640 453" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><defs><path id="MJX-42-TEX-I-1D6FC" d="M34 156Q34 270 120 356T309 442Q379 442 421 402T478 304Q484 275 485 237V208Q534 282 560 374Q564 388 566 390T582 393Q603 393 603 385Q603 376 594 346T558 261T497 161L486 147L487 123Q489 67 495 47T514 26Q528 28 540 37T557 60Q559 67 562 68T577 70Q597 70 597 62Q597 56 591 43Q579 19 556 5T512 -10H505Q438 -10 414 62L411 69L400 61Q390 53 370 41T325 18T267 -2T203 -11Q124 -11 79 39T34 156ZM208 26Q257 26 306 47T379 90L403 112Q401 255 396 290Q382 405 304 405Q235 405 183 332Q156 292 139 224T121 120Q121 71 146 49T208 26Z"></path></defs><g stroke="currentColor" fill="currentColor" stroke-width="0" transform="scale(1,-1)"><g ><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-42-TEX-I-1D6FC"></use></g></g></g></svg>
\ No newline at end of file diff --git a/77011-h/images/30.svg b/77011-h/images/30.svg new file mode 100644 index 0000000..ebef520 --- /dev/null +++ b/77011-h/images/30.svg @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +<svg version="1.1" style="vertical-align: -3.43ex;" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="13195.3px" height="3531.9px" viewBox="0 -2016 13195.3 3531.9" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><defs><path id="MJX-84-TEX-N-50" d="M130 622Q123 629 119 631T103 634T60 637H27V683H214Q237 683 276 683T331 684Q419 684 471 671T567 616Q624 563 624 489Q624 421 573 372T451 307Q429 302 328 301H234V181Q234 62 237 58Q245 47 304 46H337V0H326Q305 3 182 3Q47 3 38 0H27V46H60Q102 47 111 49T130 61V622ZM507 488Q507 514 506 528T500 564T483 597T450 620T397 635Q385 637 307 637H286Q237 637 234 628Q231 624 231 483V342H302H339Q390 342 423 349T481 382Q507 411 507 488Z"></path><path id="MJX-84-TEX-N-3D" d="M56 347Q56 360 70 367H707Q722 359 722 347Q722 336 708 328L390 327H72Q56 332 56 347ZM56 153Q56 168 72 173H708Q722 163 722 153Q722 140 707 133H70Q56 140 56 153Z"></path><path id="MJX-84-TEX-N-2212" d="M84 237T84 250T98 270H679Q694 262 694 250T679 230H98Q84 237 84 250Z"></path><path id="MJX-84-TEX-I-1D6FD" d="M29 -194Q23 -188 23 -186Q23 -183 102 134T186 465Q208 533 243 584T309 658Q365 705 429 705H431Q493 705 533 667T573 570Q573 465 469 396L482 383Q533 332 533 252Q533 139 448 65T257 -10Q227 -10 203 -2T165 17T143 40T131 59T126 65L62 -188Q60 -194 42 -194H29ZM353 431Q392 431 427 419L432 422Q436 426 439 429T449 439T461 453T472 471T484 495T493 524T501 560Q503 569 503 593Q503 611 502 616Q487 667 426 667Q384 667 347 643T286 582T247 514T224 455Q219 439 186 308T152 168Q151 163 151 147Q151 99 173 68Q204 26 260 26Q302 26 349 51T425 137Q441 171 449 214T457 279Q457 337 422 372Q380 358 347 358H337Q258 358 258 389Q258 396 261 403Q275 431 353 431Z"></path><path id="MJX-84-TEX-I-1D463" d="M173 380Q173 405 154 405Q130 405 104 376T61 287Q60 286 59 284T58 281T56 279T53 278T49 278T41 278H27Q21 284 21 287Q21 294 29 316T53 368T97 419T160 441Q202 441 225 417T249 361Q249 344 246 335Q246 329 231 291T200 202T182 113Q182 86 187 69Q200 26 250 26Q287 26 319 60T369 139T398 222T409 277Q409 300 401 317T383 343T365 361T357 383Q357 405 376 424T417 443Q436 443 451 425T467 367Q467 340 455 284T418 159T347 40T241 -11Q177 -11 139 22Q102 54 102 117Q102 148 110 181T151 298Q173 362 173 380Z"></path><path id="MJX-84-TEX-I-1D706" d="M166 673Q166 685 183 694H202Q292 691 316 644Q322 629 373 486T474 207T524 67Q531 47 537 34T546 15T551 6T555 2T556 -2T550 -11H482Q457 3 450 18T399 152L354 277L340 262Q327 246 293 207T236 141Q211 112 174 69Q123 9 111 -1T83 -12Q47 -12 47 20Q47 37 61 52T199 187Q229 216 266 252T321 306L338 322Q338 323 288 462T234 612Q214 657 183 657Q166 657 166 673Z"></path><path id="MJX-84-TEX-N-56" d="M114 620Q113 621 110 624T107 627T103 630T98 632T91 634T80 635T67 636T48 637H19V683H28Q46 680 152 680Q273 680 294 683H305V637H284Q223 634 223 620Q223 618 313 372T404 126L490 358Q575 588 575 597Q575 616 554 626T508 637H503V683H512Q527 680 627 680Q718 680 724 683H730V637H723Q648 637 627 596Q627 595 515 291T401 -14Q396 -22 382 -22H374H367Q353 -22 348 -14Q346 -12 231 303Q114 617 114 620Z"></path><path id="MJX-84-TEX-N-32" d="M109 429Q82 429 66 447T50 491Q50 562 103 614T235 666Q326 666 387 610T449 465Q449 422 429 383T381 315T301 241Q265 210 201 149L142 93L218 92Q375 92 385 97Q392 99 409 186V189H449V186Q448 183 436 95T421 3V0H50V19V31Q50 38 56 46T86 81Q115 113 136 137Q145 147 170 174T204 211T233 244T261 278T284 308T305 340T320 369T333 401T340 431T343 464Q343 527 309 573T212 619Q179 619 154 602T119 569T109 550Q109 549 114 549Q132 549 151 535T170 489Q170 464 154 447T109 429Z"></path><path id="MJX-84-TEX-N-2C" d="M78 35T78 60T94 103T137 121Q165 121 187 96T210 8Q210 -27 201 -60T180 -117T154 -158T130 -185T117 -194Q113 -194 104 -185T95 -172Q95 -168 106 -156T131 -126T157 -76T173 -3V9L172 8Q170 7 167 6T161 3T152 1T140 0Q113 0 96 17Z"></path><path id="MJX-84-TEX-N-53" d="M55 507Q55 590 112 647T243 704H257Q342 704 405 641L426 672Q431 679 436 687T446 700L449 704Q450 704 453 704T459 705H463Q466 705 472 699V462L466 456H448Q437 456 435 459T430 479Q413 605 329 646Q292 662 254 662Q201 662 168 626T135 542Q135 508 152 480T200 435Q210 431 286 412T370 389Q427 367 463 314T500 191Q500 110 448 45T301 -21Q245 -21 201 -4T140 27L122 41Q118 36 107 21T87 -7T78 -21Q76 -22 68 -22H64Q61 -22 55 -16V101Q55 220 56 222Q58 227 76 227H89Q95 221 95 214Q95 182 105 151T139 90T205 42T305 24Q352 24 386 62T420 155Q420 198 398 233T340 281Q284 295 266 300Q261 301 239 306T206 314T174 325T141 343T112 367T85 402Q55 451 55 507Z"></path><path id="MJX-84-TEX-N-77" d="M90 368Q84 378 76 380T40 385H18V431H24L43 430Q62 430 84 429T116 428Q206 428 221 431H229V385H215Q177 383 177 368Q177 367 221 239L265 113L339 328L333 345Q323 374 316 379Q308 384 278 385H258V431H264Q270 428 348 428Q439 428 454 431H461V385H452Q404 385 404 369Q404 366 418 324T449 234T481 143L496 100L537 219Q579 341 579 347Q579 363 564 373T530 385H522V431H529Q541 428 624 428Q692 428 698 431H703V385H697Q696 385 691 385T682 384Q635 377 619 334L559 161Q546 124 528 71Q508 12 503 1T487 -11H479Q460 -11 456 -4Q455 -3 407 133L361 267Q359 263 266 -4Q261 -11 243 -11H238Q225 -11 220 -3L90 368Z"></path><path id="MJX-84-TEX-N-68" d="M41 46H55Q94 46 102 60V68Q102 77 102 91T102 124T102 167T103 217T103 272T103 329Q103 366 103 407T103 482T102 542T102 586T102 603Q99 622 88 628T43 637H25V660Q25 683 27 683L37 684Q47 685 66 686T103 688Q120 689 140 690T170 693T181 694H184V367Q244 442 328 442Q451 442 463 329Q464 322 464 190V104Q464 66 466 59T477 49Q498 46 526 46H542V0H534L510 1Q487 2 460 2T422 3Q319 3 310 0H302V46H318Q379 46 379 62Q380 64 380 200Q379 335 378 343Q372 371 358 385T334 402T308 404Q263 404 229 370Q202 343 195 315T187 232V168V108Q187 78 188 68T191 55T200 49Q221 46 249 46H265V0H257L234 1Q210 2 183 2T145 3Q42 3 33 0H25V46H41Z"></path><path id="MJX-84-TEX-N-65" d="M28 218Q28 273 48 318T98 391T163 433T229 448Q282 448 320 430T378 380T406 316T415 245Q415 238 408 231H126V216Q126 68 226 36Q246 30 270 30Q312 30 342 62Q359 79 369 104L379 128Q382 131 395 131H398Q415 131 415 121Q415 117 412 108Q393 53 349 21T250 -11Q155 -11 92 58T28 218ZM333 275Q322 403 238 411H236Q228 411 220 410T195 402T166 381T143 340T127 274V267H333V275Z"></path><path id="MJX-84-TEX-N-72" d="M36 46H50Q89 46 97 60V68Q97 77 97 91T98 122T98 161T98 203Q98 234 98 269T98 328L97 351Q94 370 83 376T38 385H20V408Q20 431 22 431L32 432Q42 433 60 434T96 436Q112 437 131 438T160 441T171 442H174V373Q213 441 271 441H277Q322 441 343 419T364 373Q364 352 351 337T313 322Q288 322 276 338T263 372Q263 381 265 388T270 400T273 405Q271 407 250 401Q234 393 226 386Q179 341 179 207V154Q179 141 179 127T179 101T180 81T180 66V61Q181 59 183 57T188 54T193 51T200 49T207 48T216 47T225 47T235 46T245 46H276V0H267Q249 3 140 3Q37 3 28 0H20V46H36Z"></path><path id="MJX-84-TEX-V-2032" d="M79 43Q73 43 52 49T30 61Q30 68 85 293T146 528Q161 560 198 560Q218 560 240 545T262 501Q262 496 260 486Q259 479 173 263T84 45T79 43Z"></path><path id="MJX-84-TEX-N-2E" d="M78 60Q78 84 95 102T138 120Q162 120 180 104T199 61Q199 36 182 18T139 0T96 17T78 60Z"></path></defs><g stroke="currentColor" fill="currentColor" stroke-width="0" transform="scale(1,-1)"><g ><g ><g transform="translate(0,635)"><g ></g><g transform="translate(3558,0)"><g ><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-84-TEX-N-50"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(958.8,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-84-TEX-N-3D"></use></g><g transform="translate(2014.6,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-84-TEX-N-2212"></use></g><g transform="translate(2792.6,0)"><g ><g transform="translate(579.3,676)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-84-TEX-I-1D6FD"></use></g><g transform="translate(566,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-84-TEX-I-1D463"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(220,-719.9)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-84-TEX-I-1D706"></use></g><g transform="translate(583,0)"><g ><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-84-TEX-N-56"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(783,289) scale(0.707)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-84-TEX-N-32"></use></g></g></g><rect width="1969.6" height="60" x="120" y="220"></rect></g></g><g transform="translate(5002.1,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-84-TEX-N-2C"></use></g><g transform="translate(5280.1,0)"><g ></g></g><g transform="translate(6446.8,0)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-84-TEX-N-53"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(7280.6,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-84-TEX-N-3D"></use></g><g transform="translate(8336.3,0)"><g ><g transform="translate(228.5,676)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-84-TEX-I-1D6FD"></use></g><g transform="translate(220,-686)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-84-TEX-I-1D706"></use></g><rect width="783" height="60" x="120" y="220"></rect></g></g><g transform="translate(9359.3,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-84-TEX-N-2C"></use></g></g></g><g transform="translate(0,-1266)"><g ><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-84-TEX-N-77"></use><use xlink:href="#MJX-84-TEX-N-68" transform="translate(722,0)"></use><use xlink:href="#MJX-84-TEX-N-65" transform="translate(1278,0)"></use><use xlink:href="#MJX-84-TEX-N-72" transform="translate(1722,0)"></use><use xlink:href="#MJX-84-TEX-N-65" transform="translate(2114,0)"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(3558,0)"><g ><g ></g></g><g transform="translate(2000,0)"><g ></g></g><g transform="translate(4000,0)"><g ><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-84-TEX-N-56"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(783,363) scale(0.707)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-84-TEX-V-2032"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(5305.2,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-84-TEX-N-3D"></use></g><g transform="translate(6361,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-84-TEX-I-1D706"></use></g><g transform="translate(6944,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-84-TEX-N-2E"></use></g></g></g></g></g></g></svg>
\ No newline at end of file diff --git a/77011-h/images/31.svg b/77011-h/images/31.svg new file mode 100644 index 0000000..5062fa5 --- /dev/null +++ b/77011-h/images/31.svg @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +<svg version="1.1" style="vertical-align: -8.221ex;" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="9114.3px" height="7767.3px" viewBox="0 -4133.6 9114.3 7767.3" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><defs><path id="MJX-85-TEX-I-1D6FD" d="M29 -194Q23 -188 23 -186Q23 -183 102 134T186 465Q208 533 243 584T309 658Q365 705 429 705H431Q493 705 533 667T573 570Q573 465 469 396L482 383Q533 332 533 252Q533 139 448 65T257 -10Q227 -10 203 -2T165 17T143 40T131 59T126 65L62 -188Q60 -194 42 -194H29ZM353 431Q392 431 427 419L432 422Q436 426 439 429T449 439T461 453T472 471T484 495T493 524T501 560Q503 569 503 593Q503 611 502 616Q487 667 426 667Q384 667 347 643T286 582T247 514T224 455Q219 439 186 308T152 168Q151 163 151 147Q151 99 173 68Q204 26 260 26Q302 26 349 51T425 137Q441 171 449 214T457 279Q457 337 422 372Q380 358 347 358H337Q258 358 258 389Q258 396 261 403Q275 431 353 431Z"></path><path id="MJX-85-TEX-N-32" d="M109 429Q82 429 66 447T50 491Q50 562 103 614T235 666Q326 666 387 610T449 465Q449 422 429 383T381 315T301 241Q265 210 201 149L142 93L218 92Q375 92 385 97Q392 99 409 186V189H449V186Q448 183 436 95T421 3V0H50V19V31Q50 38 56 46T86 81Q115 113 136 137Q145 147 170 174T204 211T233 244T261 278T284 308T305 340T320 369T333 401T340 431T343 464Q343 527 309 573T212 619Q179 619 154 602T119 569T109 550Q109 549 114 549Q132 549 151 535T170 489Q170 464 154 447T109 429Z"></path><path id="MJX-85-TEX-N-3D" d="M56 347Q56 360 70 367H707Q722 359 722 347Q722 336 708 328L390 327H72Q56 332 56 347ZM56 153Q56 168 72 173H708Q722 163 722 153Q722 140 707 133H70Q56 140 56 153Z"></path><path id="MJX-85-TEX-N-31" d="M213 578L200 573Q186 568 160 563T102 556H83V602H102Q149 604 189 617T245 641T273 663Q275 666 285 666Q294 666 302 660V361L303 61Q310 54 315 52T339 48T401 46H427V0H416Q395 3 257 3Q121 3 100 0H88V46H114Q136 46 152 46T177 47T193 50T201 52T207 57T213 61V578Z"></path><path id="MJX-85-TEX-S3-28" d="M701 -940Q701 -943 695 -949H664Q662 -947 636 -922T591 -879T537 -818T475 -737T412 -636T350 -511T295 -362T250 -186T221 17T209 251Q209 962 573 1361Q596 1386 616 1405T649 1437T664 1450H695Q701 1444 701 1441Q701 1436 681 1415T629 1356T557 1261T476 1118T400 927T340 675T308 359Q306 321 306 250Q306 -139 400 -430T690 -924Q701 -936 701 -940Z"></path><path id="MJX-85-TEX-N-2212" d="M84 237T84 250T98 270H679Q694 262 694 250T679 230H98Q84 237 84 250Z"></path><path id="MJX-85-TEX-I-1D463" d="M173 380Q173 405 154 405Q130 405 104 376T61 287Q60 286 59 284T58 281T56 279T53 278T49 278T41 278H27Q21 284 21 287Q21 294 29 316T53 368T97 419T160 441Q202 441 225 417T249 361Q249 344 246 335Q246 329 231 291T200 202T182 113Q182 86 187 69Q200 26 250 26Q287 26 319 60T369 139T398 222T409 277Q409 300 401 317T383 343T365 361T357 383Q357 405 376 424T417 443Q436 443 451 425T467 367Q467 340 455 284T418 159T347 40T241 -11Q177 -11 139 22Q102 54 102 117Q102 148 110 181T151 298Q173 362 173 380Z"></path><path id="MJX-85-TEX-N-56" d="M114 620Q113 621 110 624T107 627T103 630T98 632T91 634T80 635T67 636T48 637H19V683H28Q46 680 152 680Q273 680 294 683H305V637H284Q223 634 223 620Q223 618 313 372T404 126L490 358Q575 588 575 597Q575 616 554 626T508 637H503V683H512Q527 680 627 680Q718 680 724 683H730V637H723Q648 637 627 596Q627 595 515 291T401 -14Q396 -22 382 -22H374H367Q353 -22 348 -14Q346 -12 231 303Q114 617 114 620Z"></path><path id="MJX-85-TEX-S3-29" d="M34 1438Q34 1446 37 1448T50 1450H56H71Q73 1448 99 1423T144 1380T198 1319T260 1238T323 1137T385 1013T440 864T485 688T514 485T526 251Q526 134 519 53Q472 -519 162 -860Q139 -885 119 -904T86 -936T71 -949H56Q43 -949 39 -947T34 -937Q88 -883 140 -813Q428 -430 428 251Q428 453 402 628T338 922T245 1146T145 1309T46 1425Q44 1427 42 1429T39 1433T36 1436L34 1438Z"></path><path id="MJX-85-TEX-N-2C" d="M78 35T78 60T94 103T137 121Q165 121 187 96T210 8Q210 -27 201 -60T180 -117T154 -158T130 -185T117 -194Q113 -194 104 -185T95 -172Q95 -168 106 -156T131 -126T157 -76T173 -3V9L172 8Q170 7 167 6T161 3T152 1T140 0Q113 0 96 17Z"></path><path id="MJX-85-TEX-N-54" d="M36 443Q37 448 46 558T55 671V677H666V671Q667 666 676 556T685 443V437H645V443Q645 445 642 478T631 544T610 593Q593 614 555 625Q534 630 478 630H451H443Q417 630 414 618Q413 616 413 339V63Q420 53 439 50T528 46H558V0H545L361 3Q186 1 177 0H164V46H194Q264 46 283 49T309 63V339V550Q309 620 304 625T271 630H244H224Q154 630 119 601Q101 585 93 554T81 486T76 443V437H36V443Z"></path><path id="MJX-85-TEX-S3-7B" d="M618 -943L612 -949H582L568 -943Q472 -903 411 -841T332 -703Q327 -682 327 -653T325 -350Q324 -28 323 -18Q317 24 301 61T264 124T221 171T179 205T147 225T132 234Q130 238 130 250Q130 255 130 258T131 264T132 267T134 269T139 272T144 275Q207 308 256 367Q310 436 323 519Q324 529 325 851Q326 1124 326 1154T332 1205Q369 1358 566 1443L582 1450H612L618 1444V1429Q618 1413 616 1411L608 1406Q599 1402 585 1393T552 1372T515 1343T479 1305T449 1257T429 1200Q425 1180 425 1152T423 851Q422 579 422 549T416 498Q407 459 388 424T346 364T297 318T250 284T214 264T197 254L188 251L205 242Q290 200 345 138T416 3Q421 -18 421 -48T423 -349Q423 -397 423 -472Q424 -677 428 -694Q429 -697 429 -699Q434 -722 443 -743T465 -782T491 -816T519 -845T548 -868T574 -886T595 -899T610 -908L616 -910Q618 -912 618 -928V-943Z"></path><path id="MJX-85-TEX-I-1D461" d="M26 385Q19 392 19 395Q19 399 22 411T27 425Q29 430 36 430T87 431H140L159 511Q162 522 166 540T173 566T179 586T187 603T197 615T211 624T229 626Q247 625 254 615T261 596Q261 589 252 549T232 470L222 433Q222 431 272 431H323Q330 424 330 420Q330 398 317 385H210L174 240Q135 80 135 68Q135 26 162 26Q197 26 230 60T283 144Q285 150 288 151T303 153H307Q322 153 322 145Q322 142 319 133Q314 117 301 95T267 48T216 6T155 -11Q125 -11 98 4T59 56Q57 64 57 83V101L92 241Q127 382 128 383Q128 385 77 385H26Z"></path><path id="MJX-85-TEX-I-1D465" d="M52 289Q59 331 106 386T222 442Q257 442 286 424T329 379Q371 442 430 442Q467 442 494 420T522 361Q522 332 508 314T481 292T458 288Q439 288 427 299T415 328Q415 374 465 391Q454 404 425 404Q412 404 406 402Q368 386 350 336Q290 115 290 78Q290 50 306 38T341 26Q378 26 414 59T463 140Q466 150 469 151T485 153H489Q504 153 504 145Q504 144 502 134Q486 77 440 33T333 -11Q263 -11 227 52Q186 -10 133 -10H127Q78 -10 57 16T35 71Q35 103 54 123T99 143Q142 143 142 101Q142 81 130 66T107 46T94 41L91 40Q91 39 97 36T113 29T132 26Q168 26 194 71Q203 87 217 139T245 247T261 313Q266 340 266 352Q266 380 251 392T217 404Q177 404 142 372T93 290Q91 281 88 280T72 278H58Q52 284 52 289Z"></path><path id="MJX-85-TEX-S3-7D" d="M131 1414T131 1429T133 1447T148 1450H153H167L182 1444Q276 1404 336 1343T415 1207Q421 1184 421 1154T423 851L424 531L426 517Q434 462 460 415T518 339T571 296T608 274Q615 270 616 267T618 251Q618 241 618 238T615 232T608 227Q542 194 491 132T426 -15L424 -29L423 -350Q422 -622 422 -652T415 -706Q397 -780 337 -841T182 -943L167 -949H153Q137 -949 134 -946T131 -928Q131 -914 132 -911T144 -904Q146 -903 148 -902Q299 -820 323 -680Q324 -663 325 -349T327 -19Q355 145 541 241L561 250L541 260Q356 355 327 520Q326 537 325 850T323 1181Q315 1227 293 1267T244 1332T193 1374T151 1401T132 1413Q131 1414 131 1429Z"></path><path id="MJX-85-TEX-I-1D706" d="M166 673Q166 685 183 694H202Q292 691 316 644Q322 629 373 486T474 207T524 67Q531 47 537 34T546 15T551 6T555 2T556 -2T550 -11H482Q457 3 450 18T399 152L354 277L340 262Q327 246 293 207T236 141Q211 112 174 69Q123 9 111 -1T83 -12Q47 -12 47 20Q47 37 61 52T199 187Q229 216 266 252T321 306L338 322Q338 323 288 462T234 612Q214 657 183 657Q166 657 166 673Z"></path><path id="MJX-85-TEX-V-2032" d="M79 43Q73 43 52 49T30 61Q30 68 85 293T146 528Q161 560 198 560Q218 560 240 545T262 501Q262 496 260 486Q259 479 173 263T84 45T79 43Z"></path><path id="MJX-85-TEX-N-2E" d="M78 60Q78 84 95 102T138 120Q162 120 180 104T199 61Q199 36 182 18T139 0T96 17T78 60Z"></path></defs><g stroke="currentColor" fill="currentColor" stroke-width="0" transform="scale(1,-1)"><g ><g ><g transform="translate(0,3268.7)"><g ><g ><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-85-TEX-I-1D6FD"></use></g><g transform="translate(599,363) scale(0.707)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-85-TEX-N-32"></use></g></g></g><g transform="translate(2027.5,0)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-85-TEX-N-3D"></use></g><g transform="translate(1055.8,0)"><g transform="translate(1655,394) scale(0.707)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-85-TEX-N-31"></use></g><g transform="translate(220,-865) scale(0.707)"><g transform="translate(0 -0.5)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-85-TEX-S3-28"></use></g><g transform="translate(736,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-85-TEX-N-31"></use></g><g transform="translate(1236,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-85-TEX-N-2212"></use></g><g transform="translate(2014,0) scale(1.414)"><g ><g transform="translate(313.7,394) scale(0.707)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-85-TEX-I-1D463"></use></g><g transform="translate(518,363) scale(0.707)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-85-TEX-N-32"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(220,-377.4) scale(0.707)"><g ><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-85-TEX-N-56"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(783,289) scale(0.707)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-85-TEX-N-32"></use></g></g><rect width="1039" height="60" x="120" y="220"></rect></g></g><g transform="translate(3822.8,0) translate(0 -0.5)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-85-TEX-S3-29"></use></g></g><rect width="3423.6" height="60" x="120" y="220"></rect></g><g transform="translate(4719.3,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-85-TEX-N-2C"></use></g></g></g><g transform="translate(0,-1526.7)"><g ><g ><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-85-TEX-N-54"></use></g></g></g><g transform="translate(2027.5,0)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-85-TEX-N-3D"></use></g><g transform="translate(1055.8,0)"><g ><g transform="translate(220,1409.5)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-85-TEX-I-1D6FD"></use></g><g transform="translate(732.7,0)"><g transform="translate(0 -0.5)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-85-TEX-S3-7B"></use></g><g transform="translate(750,0)"><g ><g transform="translate(220,676)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-85-TEX-I-1D461"></use></g><g transform="translate(583.2,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-85-TEX-N-2212"></use></g><g transform="translate(1583.4,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-85-TEX-I-1D463"></use></g><g transform="translate(2068.4,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-85-TEX-I-1D465"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(946.9,-719.9)"><g ><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-85-TEX-N-56"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(783,289) scale(0.707)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-85-TEX-N-32"></use></g></g><rect width="2840.4" height="60" x="120" y="220"></rect></g></g><g transform="translate(3830.4,0) translate(0 -0.5)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-85-TEX-S3-7D"></use></g></g></g><g transform="translate(2585.1,-686)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-85-TEX-I-1D706"></use></g><rect width="5513.1" height="60" x="120" y="220"></rect></g></g><g transform="translate(6808.9,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-85-TEX-N-2C"></use></g></g></g><g transform="translate(0,-3383.6)"><g ><g ><g ><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-85-TEX-N-56"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(783,363) scale(0.707)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-85-TEX-V-2032"></use></g></g></g><g transform="translate(2027.5,0)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-85-TEX-N-3D"></use></g><g transform="translate(1055.8,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-85-TEX-I-1D706"></use></g><g transform="translate(1638.8,0)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-85-TEX-N-56"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(2388.8,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-85-TEX-N-2E"></use></g></g></g></g></g></g></svg>
\ No newline at end of file diff --git a/77011-h/images/32.svg b/77011-h/images/32.svg new file mode 100644 index 0000000..6ae9946 --- /dev/null +++ b/77011-h/images/32.svg @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +<svg version="1.1" style="vertical-align: -0.027ex;" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="583px" height="706px" viewBox="0 -694 583 706" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><defs><path id="MJX-86-TEX-I-1D706" d="M166 673Q166 685 183 694H202Q292 691 316 644Q322 629 373 486T474 207T524 67Q531 47 537 34T546 15T551 6T555 2T556 -2T550 -11H482Q457 3 450 18T399 152L354 277L340 262Q327 246 293 207T236 141Q211 112 174 69Q123 9 111 -1T83 -12Q47 -12 47 20Q47 37 61 52T199 187Q229 216 266 252T321 306L338 322Q338 323 288 462T234 612Q214 657 183 657Q166 657 166 673Z"></path></defs><g stroke="currentColor" fill="currentColor" stroke-width="0" transform="scale(1,-1)"><g ><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-86-TEX-I-1D706"></use></g></g></g></svg>
\ No newline at end of file diff --git a/77011-h/images/33.svg b/77011-h/images/33.svg new file mode 100644 index 0000000..cb9dd3a --- /dev/null +++ b/77011-h/images/33.svg @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +<svg version="1.1" style="vertical-align: -0.186ex;" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="2416.6px" height="776px" viewBox="0 -694 2416.6 776" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><defs><path id="MJX-87-TEX-I-1D706" d="M166 673Q166 685 183 694H202Q292 691 316 644Q322 629 373 486T474 207T524 67Q531 47 537 34T546 15T551 6T555 2T556 -2T550 -11H482Q457 3 450 18T399 152L354 277L340 262Q327 246 293 207T236 141Q211 112 174 69Q123 9 111 -1T83 -12Q47 -12 47 20Q47 37 61 52T199 187Q229 216 266 252T321 306L338 322Q338 323 288 462T234 612Q214 657 183 657Q166 657 166 673Z"></path><path id="MJX-87-TEX-N-3D" d="M56 347Q56 360 70 367H707Q722 359 722 347Q722 336 708 328L390 327H72Q56 332 56 347ZM56 153Q56 168 72 173H708Q722 163 722 153Q722 140 707 133H70Q56 140 56 153Z"></path><path id="MJX-87-TEX-N-31" d="M213 578L200 573Q186 568 160 563T102 556H83V602H102Q149 604 189 617T245 641T273 663Q275 666 285 666Q294 666 302 660V361L303 61Q310 54 315 52T339 48T401 46H427V0H416Q395 3 257 3Q121 3 100 0H88V46H114Q136 46 152 46T177 47T193 50T201 52T207 57T213 61V578Z"></path></defs><g stroke="currentColor" fill="currentColor" stroke-width="0" transform="scale(1,-1)"><g ><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-87-TEX-I-1D706"></use></g><g transform="translate(860.8,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-87-TEX-N-3D"></use></g><g transform="translate(1916.6,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-87-TEX-N-31"></use></g></g></g></svg>
\ No newline at end of file diff --git a/77011-h/images/34.svg b/77011-h/images/34.svg new file mode 100644 index 0000000..97419aa --- /dev/null +++ b/77011-h/images/34.svg @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +<svg version="1.1" style="vertical-align: -8.221ex;" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="13503.3px" height="7767.3px" viewBox="0 -4133.6 13503.3 7767.3" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><defs><path id="MJX-88-TEX-I-1D6FD" d="M29 -194Q23 -188 23 -186Q23 -183 102 134T186 465Q208 533 243 584T309 658Q365 705 429 705H431Q493 705 533 667T573 570Q573 465 469 396L482 383Q533 332 533 252Q533 139 448 65T257 -10Q227 -10 203 -2T165 17T143 40T131 59T126 65L62 -188Q60 -194 42 -194H29ZM353 431Q392 431 427 419L432 422Q436 426 439 429T449 439T461 453T472 471T484 495T493 524T501 560Q503 569 503 593Q503 611 502 616Q487 667 426 667Q384 667 347 643T286 582T247 514T224 455Q219 439 186 308T152 168Q151 163 151 147Q151 99 173 68Q204 26 260 26Q302 26 349 51T425 137Q441 171 449 214T457 279Q457 337 422 372Q380 358 347 358H337Q258 358 258 389Q258 396 261 403Q275 431 353 431Z"></path><path id="MJX-88-TEX-N-32" d="M109 429Q82 429 66 447T50 491Q50 562 103 614T235 666Q326 666 387 610T449 465Q449 422 429 383T381 315T301 241Q265 210 201 149L142 93L218 92Q375 92 385 97Q392 99 409 186V189H449V186Q448 183 436 95T421 3V0H50V19V31Q50 38 56 46T86 81Q115 113 136 137Q145 147 170 174T204 211T233 244T261 278T284 308T305 340T320 369T333 401T340 431T343 464Q343 527 309 573T212 619Q179 619 154 602T119 569T109 550Q109 549 114 549Q132 549 151 535T170 489Q170 464 154 447T109 429Z"></path><path id="MJX-88-TEX-N-3D" d="M56 347Q56 360 70 367H707Q722 359 722 347Q722 336 708 328L390 327H72Q56 332 56 347ZM56 153Q56 168 72 173H708Q722 163 722 153Q722 140 707 133H70Q56 140 56 153Z"></path><path id="MJX-88-TEX-N-31" d="M213 578L200 573Q186 568 160 563T102 556H83V602H102Q149 604 189 617T245 641T273 663Q275 666 285 666Q294 666 302 660V361L303 61Q310 54 315 52T339 48T401 46H427V0H416Q395 3 257 3Q121 3 100 0H88V46H114Q136 46 152 46T177 47T193 50T201 52T207 57T213 61V578Z"></path><path id="MJX-88-TEX-S3-28" d="M701 -940Q701 -943 695 -949H664Q662 -947 636 -922T591 -879T537 -818T475 -737T412 -636T350 -511T295 -362T250 -186T221 17T209 251Q209 962 573 1361Q596 1386 616 1405T649 1437T664 1450H695Q701 1444 701 1441Q701 1436 681 1415T629 1356T557 1261T476 1118T400 927T340 675T308 359Q306 321 306 250Q306 -139 400 -430T690 -924Q701 -936 701 -940Z"></path><path id="MJX-88-TEX-N-2212" d="M84 237T84 250T98 270H679Q694 262 694 250T679 230H98Q84 237 84 250Z"></path><path id="MJX-88-TEX-I-1D463" d="M173 380Q173 405 154 405Q130 405 104 376T61 287Q60 286 59 284T58 281T56 279T53 278T49 278T41 278H27Q21 284 21 287Q21 294 29 316T53 368T97 419T160 441Q202 441 225 417T249 361Q249 344 246 335Q246 329 231 291T200 202T182 113Q182 86 187 69Q200 26 250 26Q287 26 319 60T369 139T398 222T409 277Q409 300 401 317T383 343T365 361T357 383Q357 405 376 424T417 443Q436 443 451 425T467 367Q467 340 455 284T418 159T347 40T241 -11Q177 -11 139 22Q102 54 102 117Q102 148 110 181T151 298Q173 362 173 380Z"></path><path id="MJX-88-TEX-N-56" d="M114 620Q113 621 110 624T107 627T103 630T98 632T91 634T80 635T67 636T48 637H19V683H28Q46 680 152 680Q273 680 294 683H305V637H284Q223 634 223 620Q223 618 313 372T404 126L490 358Q575 588 575 597Q575 616 554 626T508 637H503V683H512Q527 680 627 680Q718 680 724 683H730V637H723Q648 637 627 596Q627 595 515 291T401 -14Q396 -22 382 -22H374H367Q353 -22 348 -14Q346 -12 231 303Q114 617 114 620Z"></path><path id="MJX-88-TEX-S3-29" d="M34 1438Q34 1446 37 1448T50 1450H56H71Q73 1448 99 1423T144 1380T198 1319T260 1238T323 1137T385 1013T440 864T485 688T514 485T526 251Q526 134 519 53Q472 -519 162 -860Q139 -885 119 -904T86 -936T71 -949H56Q43 -949 39 -947T34 -937Q88 -883 140 -813Q428 -430 428 251Q428 453 402 628T338 922T245 1146T145 1309T46 1425Q44 1427 42 1429T39 1433T36 1436L34 1438Z"></path><path id="MJX-88-TEX-N-2C" d="M78 35T78 60T94 103T137 121Q165 121 187 96T210 8Q210 -27 201 -60T180 -117T154 -158T130 -185T117 -194Q113 -194 104 -185T95 -172Q95 -168 106 -156T131 -126T157 -76T173 -3V9L172 8Q170 7 167 6T161 3T152 1T140 0Q113 0 96 17Z"></path><path id="MJX-88-TEX-N-54" d="M36 443Q37 448 46 558T55 671V677H666V671Q667 666 676 556T685 443V437H645V443Q645 445 642 478T631 544T610 593Q593 614 555 625Q534 630 478 630H451H443Q417 630 414 618Q413 616 413 339V63Q420 53 439 50T528 46H558V0H545L361 3Q186 1 177 0H164V46H194Q264 46 283 49T309 63V339V550Q309 620 304 625T271 630H244H224Q154 630 119 601Q101 585 93 554T81 486T76 443V437H36V443Z"></path><path id="MJX-88-TEX-S3-7B" d="M618 -943L612 -949H582L568 -943Q472 -903 411 -841T332 -703Q327 -682 327 -653T325 -350Q324 -28 323 -18Q317 24 301 61T264 124T221 171T179 205T147 225T132 234Q130 238 130 250Q130 255 130 258T131 264T132 267T134 269T139 272T144 275Q207 308 256 367Q310 436 323 519Q324 529 325 851Q326 1124 326 1154T332 1205Q369 1358 566 1443L582 1450H612L618 1444V1429Q618 1413 616 1411L608 1406Q599 1402 585 1393T552 1372T515 1343T479 1305T449 1257T429 1200Q425 1180 425 1152T423 851Q422 579 422 549T416 498Q407 459 388 424T346 364T297 318T250 284T214 264T197 254L188 251L205 242Q290 200 345 138T416 3Q421 -18 421 -48T423 -349Q423 -397 423 -472Q424 -677 428 -694Q429 -697 429 -699Q434 -722 443 -743T465 -782T491 -816T519 -845T548 -868T574 -886T595 -899T610 -908L616 -910Q618 -912 618 -928V-943Z"></path><path id="MJX-88-TEX-I-1D461" d="M26 385Q19 392 19 395Q19 399 22 411T27 425Q29 430 36 430T87 431H140L159 511Q162 522 166 540T173 566T179 586T187 603T197 615T211 624T229 626Q247 625 254 615T261 596Q261 589 252 549T232 470L222 433Q222 431 272 431H323Q330 424 330 420Q330 398 317 385H210L174 240Q135 80 135 68Q135 26 162 26Q197 26 230 60T283 144Q285 150 288 151T303 153H307Q322 153 322 145Q322 142 319 133Q314 117 301 95T267 48T216 6T155 -11Q125 -11 98 4T59 56Q57 64 57 83V101L92 241Q127 382 128 383Q128 385 77 385H26Z"></path><path id="MJX-88-TEX-I-1D465" d="M52 289Q59 331 106 386T222 442Q257 442 286 424T329 379Q371 442 430 442Q467 442 494 420T522 361Q522 332 508 314T481 292T458 288Q439 288 427 299T415 328Q415 374 465 391Q454 404 425 404Q412 404 406 402Q368 386 350 336Q290 115 290 78Q290 50 306 38T341 26Q378 26 414 59T463 140Q466 150 469 151T485 153H489Q504 153 504 145Q504 144 502 134Q486 77 440 33T333 -11Q263 -11 227 52Q186 -10 133 -10H127Q78 -10 57 16T35 71Q35 103 54 123T99 143Q142 143 142 101Q142 81 130 66T107 46T94 41L91 40Q91 39 97 36T113 29T132 26Q168 26 194 71Q203 87 217 139T245 247T261 313Q266 340 266 352Q266 380 251 392T217 404Q177 404 142 372T93 290Q91 281 88 280T72 278H58Q52 284 52 289Z"></path><path id="MJX-88-TEX-S3-7D" d="M131 1414T131 1429T133 1447T148 1450H153H167L182 1444Q276 1404 336 1343T415 1207Q421 1184 421 1154T423 851L424 531L426 517Q434 462 460 415T518 339T571 296T608 274Q615 270 616 267T618 251Q618 241 618 238T615 232T608 227Q542 194 491 132T426 -15L424 -29L423 -350Q422 -622 422 -652T415 -706Q397 -780 337 -841T182 -943L167 -949H153Q137 -949 134 -946T131 -928Q131 -914 132 -911T144 -904Q146 -903 148 -902Q299 -820 323 -680Q324 -663 325 -349T327 -19Q355 145 541 241L561 250L541 260Q356 355 327 520Q326 537 325 850T323 1181Q315 1227 293 1267T244 1332T193 1374T151 1401T132 1413Q131 1414 131 1429Z"></path><path id="MJX-88-TEX-I-1D706" d="M166 673Q166 685 183 694H202Q292 691 316 644Q322 629 373 486T474 207T524 67Q531 47 537 34T546 15T551 6T555 2T556 -2T550 -11H482Q457 3 450 18T399 152L354 277L340 262Q327 246 293 207T236 141Q211 112 174 69Q123 9 111 -1T83 -12Q47 -12 47 20Q47 37 61 52T199 187Q229 216 266 252T321 306L338 322Q338 323 288 462T234 612Q214 657 183 657Q166 657 166 673Z"></path><path id="MJX-88-TEX-V-2032" d="M79 43Q73 43 52 49T30 61Q30 68 85 293T146 528Q161 560 198 560Q218 560 240 545T262 501Q262 496 260 486Q259 479 173 263T84 45T79 43Z"></path><path id="MJX-88-TEX-N-2E" d="M78 60Q78 84 95 102T138 120Q162 120 180 104T199 61Q199 36 182 18T139 0T96 17T78 60Z"></path><path id="MJX-88-TEX-S4-23AB" d="M170 875Q170 892 172 895T189 899H194H211L222 893Q345 826 420 715T503 476Q504 467 504 230Q504 51 504 21T499 -9H498Q496 -10 444 -10Q402 -10 394 -9T385 -4Q384 -2 384 240V311V366Q384 469 380 513T358 609Q342 657 319 698T271 767T227 812T189 843T171 856T170 875Z"></path><path id="MJX-88-TEX-S4-23AD" d="M384 -239V-57Q384 4 389 9Q391 10 455 10Q496 10 498 9Q501 8 502 5Q504 -5 504 -230Q504 -261 504 -311T505 -381Q505 -486 492 -551T435 -691Q357 -820 222 -893L211 -899H195Q176 -899 173 -896T170 -874Q170 -858 171 -855T184 -846Q262 -793 312 -709T378 -525Q378 -524 379 -522Q383 -493 384 -351Q384 -345 384 -334Q384 -276 384 -239Z"></path><path id="MJX-88-TEX-S4-23AC" d="M389 1159Q391 1160 455 1160Q496 1160 498 1159Q501 1158 502 1155Q504 1145 504 925V782Q504 676 511 616T546 490Q563 446 587 408T633 345T674 304T705 278T717 268Q718 267 718 250T717 232Q717 231 697 216T648 169T588 93T534 -24T505 -179Q504 -191 504 -425Q504 -600 504 -629T499 -659H498Q496 -660 444 -660T390 -659Q387 -658 386 -655Q384 -645 384 -424Q384 -191 385 -182Q394 -49 463 61T645 241L659 250L645 259Q539 325 467 434T385 682Q384 692 384 873Q384 1153 385 1155L389 1159Z"></path><path id="MJX-88-TEX-S4-23AA" d="M384 150V266Q384 304 389 309Q391 310 455 310Q496 310 498 309Q502 308 503 298Q504 283 504 150Q504 32 504 12T499 -9H498Q496 -10 444 -10T390 -9Q386 -8 385 2Q384 17 384 150Z"></path><path id="MJX-88-TEX-N-28" d="M94 250Q94 319 104 381T127 488T164 576T202 643T244 695T277 729T302 750H315H319Q333 750 333 741Q333 738 316 720T275 667T226 581T184 443T167 250T184 58T225 -81T274 -167T316 -220T333 -241Q333 -250 318 -250H315H302L274 -226Q180 -141 137 -14T94 250Z"></path><path id="MJX-88-TEX-N-49" d="M328 0Q307 3 180 3T32 0H21V46H43Q92 46 106 49T126 60Q128 63 128 342Q128 620 126 623Q122 628 118 630T96 635T43 637H21V683H32Q53 680 180 680T328 683H339V637H317Q268 637 254 634T234 623Q232 620 232 342Q232 63 234 60Q238 55 242 53T264 48T317 46H339V0H328Z"></path><path id="MJX-88-TEX-N-29" d="M60 749L64 750Q69 750 74 750H86L114 726Q208 641 251 514T294 250Q294 182 284 119T261 12T224 -76T186 -143T145 -194T113 -227T90 -246Q87 -249 86 -250H74Q66 -250 63 -250T58 -247T55 -238Q56 -237 66 -225Q221 -64 221 250T66 725Q56 737 55 738Q55 746 60 749Z"></path></defs><g stroke="currentColor" fill="currentColor" stroke-width="0" transform="scale(1,-1)"><g ><g ><g transform="translate(0 250)"></g><g ><g transform="translate(0,3268.7)"><g ><g ><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-88-TEX-I-1D6FD"></use></g><g transform="translate(599,363) scale(0.707)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-88-TEX-N-32"></use></g></g></g><g transform="translate(2027.5,0)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-88-TEX-N-3D"></use></g><g transform="translate(1055.8,0)"><g transform="translate(1655,394) scale(0.707)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-88-TEX-N-31"></use></g><g transform="translate(220,-865) scale(0.707)"><g transform="translate(0 -0.5)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-88-TEX-S3-28"></use></g><g transform="translate(736,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-88-TEX-N-31"></use></g><g transform="translate(1236,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-88-TEX-N-2212"></use></g><g transform="translate(2014,0) scale(1.414)"><g ><g transform="translate(313.7,394) scale(0.707)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-88-TEX-I-1D463"></use></g><g transform="translate(518,363) scale(0.707)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-88-TEX-N-32"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(220,-377.4) scale(0.707)"><g ><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-88-TEX-N-56"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(783,289) scale(0.707)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-88-TEX-N-32"></use></g></g><rect width="1039" height="60" x="120" y="220"></rect></g></g><g transform="translate(3822.8,0) translate(0 -0.5)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-88-TEX-S3-29"></use></g></g><rect width="3423.6" height="60" x="120" y="220"></rect></g><g transform="translate(4719.3,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-88-TEX-N-2C"></use></g></g></g><g transform="translate(0,-1526.7)"><g ><g ><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-88-TEX-N-54"></use></g></g></g><g transform="translate(2027.5,0)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-88-TEX-N-3D"></use></g><g transform="translate(1055.8,0)"><g ><g transform="translate(220,1409.5)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-88-TEX-I-1D6FD"></use></g><g transform="translate(732.7,0)"><g transform="translate(0 -0.5)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-88-TEX-S3-7B"></use></g><g transform="translate(750,0)"><g ><g transform="translate(220,676)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-88-TEX-I-1D461"></use></g><g transform="translate(583.2,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-88-TEX-N-2212"></use></g><g transform="translate(1583.4,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-88-TEX-I-1D463"></use></g><g transform="translate(2068.4,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-88-TEX-I-1D465"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(946.9,-719.9)"><g ><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-88-TEX-N-56"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(783,289) scale(0.707)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-88-TEX-N-32"></use></g></g><rect width="2840.4" height="60" x="120" y="220"></rect></g></g><g transform="translate(3830.4,0) translate(0 -0.5)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-88-TEX-S3-7D"></use></g></g></g><g transform="translate(2585.1,-686)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-88-TEX-I-1D706"></use></g><rect width="5513.1" height="60" x="120" y="220"></rect></g></g><g transform="translate(6808.9,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-88-TEX-N-2C"></use></g></g></g><g transform="translate(0,-3383.6)"><g ><g ><g ><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-88-TEX-N-56"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(783,363) scale(0.707)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-88-TEX-V-2032"></use></g></g></g><g transform="translate(2027.5,0)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-88-TEX-N-3D"></use></g><g transform="translate(1055.8,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-88-TEX-I-1D706"></use></g><g transform="translate(1638.8,0)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-88-TEX-N-56"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(2388.8,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-88-TEX-N-2E"></use></g></g></g></g><g transform="translate(9114.3,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-88-TEX-S4-23AB" transform="translate(0,3234.6)"></use><use xlink:href="#MJX-88-TEX-S4-23AD" transform="translate(0,-2734.6)"></use><use xlink:href="#MJX-88-TEX-S4-23AC" transform="translate(0,0)"></use><svg width="889" height="2264.6" y="1060" x="0" viewBox="0 399.1 889 2264.6"><use xlink:href="#MJX-88-TEX-S4-23AA" transform="scale(1,11.138)"></use></svg><svg width="889" height="2264.6" y="-2824.6" x="0" viewBox="0 399.1 889 2264.6"><use xlink:href="#MJX-88-TEX-S4-23AA" transform="scale(1,11.138)"></use></svg></g></g><g transform="translate(10003.3,0)"><g ></g></g><g transform="translate(12003.3,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-88-TEX-N-28"></use><use xlink:href="#MJX-88-TEX-N-49" transform="translate(389,0)"></use><use xlink:href="#MJX-88-TEX-N-49" transform="translate(750,0)"></use><use xlink:href="#MJX-88-TEX-N-29" transform="translate(1111,0)"></use></g><g transform="translate(13503.3,0)"></g></g></g></svg>
\ No newline at end of file diff --git a/77011-h/images/35.svg b/77011-h/images/35.svg new file mode 100644 index 0000000..c2a70f1 --- /dev/null +++ b/77011-h/images/35.svg @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +<svg version="1.1" style="vertical-align: -0.439ex;" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="2482.6px" height="899px" viewBox="0 -705 2482.6 899" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><defs><path id="MJX-89-TEX-I-1D706" d="M166 673Q166 685 183 694H202Q292 691 316 644Q322 629 373 486T474 207T524 67Q531 47 537 34T546 15T551 6T555 2T556 -2T550 -11H482Q457 3 450 18T399 152L354 277L340 262Q327 246 293 207T236 141Q211 112 174 69Q123 9 111 -1T83 -12Q47 -12 47 20Q47 37 61 52T199 187Q229 216 266 252T321 306L338 322Q338 323 288 462T234 612Q214 657 183 657Q166 657 166 673Z"></path><path id="MJX-89-TEX-N-3D" d="M56 347Q56 360 70 367H707Q722 359 722 347Q722 336 708 328L390 327H72Q56 332 56 347ZM56 153Q56 168 72 173H708Q722 163 722 153Q722 140 707 133H70Q56 140 56 153Z"></path><path id="MJX-89-TEX-I-1D6FD" d="M29 -194Q23 -188 23 -186Q23 -183 102 134T186 465Q208 533 243 584T309 658Q365 705 429 705H431Q493 705 533 667T573 570Q573 465 469 396L482 383Q533 332 533 252Q533 139 448 65T257 -10Q227 -10 203 -2T165 17T143 40T131 59T126 65L62 -188Q60 -194 42 -194H29ZM353 431Q392 431 427 419L432 422Q436 426 439 429T449 439T461 453T472 471T484 495T493 524T501 560Q503 569 503 593Q503 611 502 616Q487 667 426 667Q384 667 347 643T286 582T247 514T224 455Q219 439 186 308T152 168Q151 163 151 147Q151 99 173 68Q204 26 260 26Q302 26 349 51T425 137Q441 171 449 214T457 279Q457 337 422 372Q380 358 347 358H337Q258 358 258 389Q258 396 261 403Q275 431 353 431Z"></path></defs><g stroke="currentColor" fill="currentColor" stroke-width="0" transform="scale(1,-1)"><g ><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-89-TEX-I-1D706"></use></g><g transform="translate(860.8,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-89-TEX-N-3D"></use></g><g transform="translate(1916.6,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-89-TEX-I-1D6FD"></use></g></g></g></svg>
\ No newline at end of file diff --git a/77011-h/images/36.svg b/77011-h/images/36.svg new file mode 100644 index 0000000..60cdcd1 --- /dev/null +++ b/77011-h/images/36.svg @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +<svg version="1.1" style="vertical-align: -6.509ex;" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="7024.8px" height="6254.2px" viewBox="0 -3377.1 7024.8 6254.2" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><defs><path id="MJX-90-TEX-I-1D6FD" d="M29 -194Q23 -188 23 -186Q23 -183 102 134T186 465Q208 533 243 584T309 658Q365 705 429 705H431Q493 705 533 667T573 570Q573 465 469 396L482 383Q533 332 533 252Q533 139 448 65T257 -10Q227 -10 203 -2T165 17T143 40T131 59T126 65L62 -188Q60 -194 42 -194H29ZM353 431Q392 431 427 419L432 422Q436 426 439 429T449 439T461 453T472 471T484 495T493 524T501 560Q503 569 503 593Q503 611 502 616Q487 667 426 667Q384 667 347 643T286 582T247 514T224 455Q219 439 186 308T152 168Q151 163 151 147Q151 99 173 68Q204 26 260 26Q302 26 349 51T425 137Q441 171 449 214T457 279Q457 337 422 372Q380 358 347 358H337Q258 358 258 389Q258 396 261 403Q275 431 353 431Z"></path><path id="MJX-90-TEX-N-32" d="M109 429Q82 429 66 447T50 491Q50 562 103 614T235 666Q326 666 387 610T449 465Q449 422 429 383T381 315T301 241Q265 210 201 149L142 93L218 92Q375 92 385 97Q392 99 409 186V189H449V186Q448 183 436 95T421 3V0H50V19V31Q50 38 56 46T86 81Q115 113 136 137Q145 147 170 174T204 211T233 244T261 278T284 308T305 340T320 369T333 401T340 431T343 464Q343 527 309 573T212 619Q179 619 154 602T119 569T109 550Q109 549 114 549Q132 549 151 535T170 489Q170 464 154 447T109 429Z"></path><path id="MJX-90-TEX-N-3D" d="M56 347Q56 360 70 367H707Q722 359 722 347Q722 336 708 328L390 327H72Q56 332 56 347ZM56 153Q56 168 72 173H708Q722 163 722 153Q722 140 707 133H70Q56 140 56 153Z"></path><path id="MJX-90-TEX-N-31" d="M213 578L200 573Q186 568 160 563T102 556H83V602H102Q149 604 189 617T245 641T273 663Q275 666 285 666Q294 666 302 660V361L303 61Q310 54 315 52T339 48T401 46H427V0H416Q395 3 257 3Q121 3 100 0H88V46H114Q136 46 152 46T177 47T193 50T201 52T207 57T213 61V578Z"></path><path id="MJX-90-TEX-S3-28" d="M701 -940Q701 -943 695 -949H664Q662 -947 636 -922T591 -879T537 -818T475 -737T412 -636T350 -511T295 -362T250 -186T221 17T209 251Q209 962 573 1361Q596 1386 616 1405T649 1437T664 1450H695Q701 1444 701 1441Q701 1436 681 1415T629 1356T557 1261T476 1118T400 927T340 675T308 359Q306 321 306 250Q306 -139 400 -430T690 -924Q701 -936 701 -940Z"></path><path id="MJX-90-TEX-N-2212" d="M84 237T84 250T98 270H679Q694 262 694 250T679 230H98Q84 237 84 250Z"></path><path id="MJX-90-TEX-I-1D463" d="M173 380Q173 405 154 405Q130 405 104 376T61 287Q60 286 59 284T58 281T56 279T53 278T49 278T41 278H27Q21 284 21 287Q21 294 29 316T53 368T97 419T160 441Q202 441 225 417T249 361Q249 344 246 335Q246 329 231 291T200 202T182 113Q182 86 187 69Q200 26 250 26Q287 26 319 60T369 139T398 222T409 277Q409 300 401 317T383 343T365 361T357 383Q357 405 376 424T417 443Q436 443 451 425T467 367Q467 340 455 284T418 159T347 40T241 -11Q177 -11 139 22Q102 54 102 117Q102 148 110 181T151 298Q173 362 173 380Z"></path><path id="MJX-90-TEX-N-56" d="M114 620Q113 621 110 624T107 627T103 630T98 632T91 634T80 635T67 636T48 637H19V683H28Q46 680 152 680Q273 680 294 683H305V637H284Q223 634 223 620Q223 618 313 372T404 126L490 358Q575 588 575 597Q575 616 554 626T508 637H503V683H512Q527 680 627 680Q718 680 724 683H730V637H723Q648 637 627 596Q627 595 515 291T401 -14Q396 -22 382 -22H374H367Q353 -22 348 -14Q346 -12 231 303Q114 617 114 620Z"></path><path id="MJX-90-TEX-S3-29" d="M34 1438Q34 1446 37 1448T50 1450H56H71Q73 1448 99 1423T144 1380T198 1319T260 1238T323 1137T385 1013T440 864T485 688T514 485T526 251Q526 134 519 53Q472 -519 162 -860Q139 -885 119 -904T86 -936T71 -949H56Q43 -949 39 -947T34 -937Q88 -883 140 -813Q428 -430 428 251Q428 453 402 628T338 922T245 1146T145 1309T46 1425Q44 1427 42 1429T39 1433T36 1436L34 1438Z"></path><path id="MJX-90-TEX-N-2C" d="M78 35T78 60T94 103T137 121Q165 121 187 96T210 8Q210 -27 201 -60T180 -117T154 -158T130 -185T117 -194Q113 -194 104 -185T95 -172Q95 -168 106 -156T131 -126T157 -76T173 -3V9L172 8Q170 7 167 6T161 3T152 1T140 0Q113 0 96 17Z"></path><path id="MJX-90-TEX-N-54" d="M36 443Q37 448 46 558T55 671V677H666V671Q667 666 676 556T685 443V437H645V443Q645 445 642 478T631 544T610 593Q593 614 555 625Q534 630 478 630H451H443Q417 630 414 618Q413 616 413 339V63Q420 53 439 50T528 46H558V0H545L361 3Q186 1 177 0H164V46H194Q264 46 283 49T309 63V339V550Q309 620 304 625T271 630H244H224Q154 630 119 601Q101 585 93 554T81 486T76 443V437H36V443Z"></path><path id="MJX-90-TEX-I-1D461" d="M26 385Q19 392 19 395Q19 399 22 411T27 425Q29 430 36 430T87 431H140L159 511Q162 522 166 540T173 566T179 586T187 603T197 615T211 624T229 626Q247 625 254 615T261 596Q261 589 252 549T232 470L222 433Q222 431 272 431H323Q330 424 330 420Q330 398 317 385H210L174 240Q135 80 135 68Q135 26 162 26Q197 26 230 60T283 144Q285 150 288 151T303 153H307Q322 153 322 145Q322 142 319 133Q314 117 301 95T267 48T216 6T155 -11Q125 -11 98 4T59 56Q57 64 57 83V101L92 241Q127 382 128 383Q128 385 77 385H26Z"></path><path id="MJX-90-TEX-I-1D465" d="M52 289Q59 331 106 386T222 442Q257 442 286 424T329 379Q371 442 430 442Q467 442 494 420T522 361Q522 332 508 314T481 292T458 288Q439 288 427 299T415 328Q415 374 465 391Q454 404 425 404Q412 404 406 402Q368 386 350 336Q290 115 290 78Q290 50 306 38T341 26Q378 26 414 59T463 140Q466 150 469 151T485 153H489Q504 153 504 145Q504 144 502 134Q486 77 440 33T333 -11Q263 -11 227 52Q186 -10 133 -10H127Q78 -10 57 16T35 71Q35 103 54 123T99 143Q142 143 142 101Q142 81 130 66T107 46T94 41L91 40Q91 39 97 36T113 29T132 26Q168 26 194 71Q203 87 217 139T245 247T261 313Q266 340 266 352Q266 380 251 392T217 404Q177 404 142 372T93 290Q91 281 88 280T72 278H58Q52 284 52 289Z"></path><path id="MJX-90-TEX-V-2032" d="M79 43Q73 43 52 49T30 61Q30 68 85 293T146 528Q161 560 198 560Q218 560 240 545T262 501Q262 496 260 486Q259 479 173 263T84 45T79 43Z"></path><path id="MJX-90-TEX-N-2E" d="M78 60Q78 84 95 102T138 120Q162 120 180 104T199 61Q199 36 182 18T139 0T96 17T78 60Z"></path></defs><g stroke="currentColor" fill="currentColor" stroke-width="0" transform="scale(1,-1)"><g ><g ><g transform="translate(0,2512.2)"><g ><g ><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-90-TEX-I-1D6FD"></use></g><g transform="translate(599,363) scale(0.707)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-90-TEX-N-32"></use></g></g></g><g transform="translate(2027.5,0)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-90-TEX-N-3D"></use></g><g transform="translate(1055.8,0)"><g transform="translate(1655,394) scale(0.707)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-90-TEX-N-31"></use></g><g transform="translate(220,-865) scale(0.707)"><g transform="translate(0 -0.5)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-90-TEX-S3-28"></use></g><g transform="translate(736,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-90-TEX-N-31"></use></g><g transform="translate(1236,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-90-TEX-N-2212"></use></g><g transform="translate(2014,0) scale(1.414)"><g ><g transform="translate(313.7,394) scale(0.707)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-90-TEX-I-1D463"></use></g><g transform="translate(518,363) scale(0.707)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-90-TEX-N-32"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(220,-377.4) scale(0.707)"><g ><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-90-TEX-N-56"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(783,289) scale(0.707)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-90-TEX-N-32"></use></g></g><rect width="1039" height="60" x="120" y="220"></rect></g></g><g transform="translate(3822.8,0) translate(0 -0.5)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-90-TEX-S3-29"></use></g></g><rect width="3423.6" height="60" x="120" y="220"></rect></g><g transform="translate(4719.3,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-90-TEX-N-2C"></use></g></g></g><g transform="translate(0,-726.2)"><g ><g ><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-90-TEX-N-54"></use></g></g></g><g transform="translate(2027.5,0)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-90-TEX-N-3D"></use></g><g transform="translate(1055.8,0)"><g ><g transform="translate(220,676)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-90-TEX-I-1D461"></use></g><g transform="translate(583.2,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-90-TEX-N-2212"></use></g><g transform="translate(1583.4,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-90-TEX-I-1D463"></use></g><g transform="translate(2068.4,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-90-TEX-I-1D465"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(946.9,-719.9)"><g ><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-90-TEX-N-56"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(783,289) scale(0.707)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-90-TEX-N-32"></use></g></g><rect width="2840.4" height="60" x="120" y="220"></rect></g></g><g transform="translate(4136.2,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-90-TEX-N-2C"></use></g></g></g><g transform="translate(0,-2627.1)"><g ><g ><g ><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-90-TEX-N-56"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(783,363) scale(0.707)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-90-TEX-V-2032"></use></g></g></g><g transform="translate(2027.5,0)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-90-TEX-N-3D"></use></g><g transform="translate(1055.8,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-90-TEX-I-1D6FD"></use></g><g transform="translate(1621.8,0)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-90-TEX-N-56"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(2371.8,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-90-TEX-N-2E"></use></g></g></g></g></g></g></svg>
\ No newline at end of file diff --git a/77011-h/images/37.svg b/77011-h/images/37.svg new file mode 100644 index 0000000..5aaa2b3 --- /dev/null +++ b/77011-h/images/37.svg @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +<svg version="1.1" style="vertical-align: -5.474ex;" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="7357.6px" height="5278.4px" viewBox="0 -2859 7357.6 5278.4" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><defs><path id="MJX-91-TEX-N-54" d="M36 443Q37 448 46 558T55 671V677H666V671Q667 666 676 556T685 443V437H645V443Q645 445 642 478T631 544T610 593Q593 614 555 625Q534 630 478 630H451H443Q417 630 414 618Q413 616 413 339V63Q420 53 439 50T528 46H558V0H545L361 3Q186 1 177 0H164V46H194Q264 46 283 49T309 63V339V550Q309 620 304 625T271 630H244H224Q154 630 119 601Q101 585 93 554T81 486T76 443V437H36V443Z"></path><path id="MJX-91-TEX-N-3D" d="M56 347Q56 360 70 367H707Q722 359 722 347Q722 336 708 328L390 327H72Q56 332 56 347ZM56 153Q56 168 72 173H708Q722 163 722 153Q722 140 707 133H70Q56 140 56 153Z"></path><path id="MJX-91-TEX-S3-7B" d="M618 -943L612 -949H582L568 -943Q472 -903 411 -841T332 -703Q327 -682 327 -653T325 -350Q324 -28 323 -18Q317 24 301 61T264 124T221 171T179 205T147 225T132 234Q130 238 130 250Q130 255 130 258T131 264T132 267T134 269T139 272T144 275Q207 308 256 367Q310 436 323 519Q324 529 325 851Q326 1124 326 1154T332 1205Q369 1358 566 1443L582 1450H612L618 1444V1429Q618 1413 616 1411L608 1406Q599 1402 585 1393T552 1372T515 1343T479 1305T449 1257T429 1200Q425 1180 425 1152T423 851Q422 579 422 549T416 498Q407 459 388 424T346 364T297 318T250 284T214 264T197 254L188 251L205 242Q290 200 345 138T416 3Q421 -18 421 -48T423 -349Q423 -397 423 -472Q424 -677 428 -694Q429 -697 429 -699Q434 -722 443 -743T465 -782T491 -816T519 -845T548 -868T574 -886T595 -899T610 -908L616 -910Q618 -912 618 -928V-943Z"></path><path id="MJX-91-TEX-I-1D461" d="M26 385Q19 392 19 395Q19 399 22 411T27 425Q29 430 36 430T87 431H140L159 511Q162 522 166 540T173 566T179 586T187 603T197 615T211 624T229 626Q247 625 254 615T261 596Q261 589 252 549T232 470L222 433Q222 431 272 431H323Q330 424 330 420Q330 398 317 385H210L174 240Q135 80 135 68Q135 26 162 26Q197 26 230 60T283 144Q285 150 288 151T303 153H307Q322 153 322 145Q322 142 319 133Q314 117 301 95T267 48T216 6T155 -11Q125 -11 98 4T59 56Q57 64 57 83V101L92 241Q127 382 128 383Q128 385 77 385H26Z"></path><path id="MJX-91-TEX-N-2212" d="M84 237T84 250T98 270H679Q694 262 694 250T679 230H98Q84 237 84 250Z"></path><path id="MJX-91-TEX-I-1D463" d="M173 380Q173 405 154 405Q130 405 104 376T61 287Q60 286 59 284T58 281T56 279T53 278T49 278T41 278H27Q21 284 21 287Q21 294 29 316T53 368T97 419T160 441Q202 441 225 417T249 361Q249 344 246 335Q246 329 231 291T200 202T182 113Q182 86 187 69Q200 26 250 26Q287 26 319 60T369 139T398 222T409 277Q409 300 401 317T383 343T365 361T357 383Q357 405 376 424T417 443Q436 443 451 425T467 367Q467 340 455 284T418 159T347 40T241 -11Q177 -11 139 22Q102 54 102 117Q102 148 110 181T151 298Q173 362 173 380Z"></path><path id="MJX-91-TEX-I-1D465" d="M52 289Q59 331 106 386T222 442Q257 442 286 424T329 379Q371 442 430 442Q467 442 494 420T522 361Q522 332 508 314T481 292T458 288Q439 288 427 299T415 328Q415 374 465 391Q454 404 425 404Q412 404 406 402Q368 386 350 336Q290 115 290 78Q290 50 306 38T341 26Q378 26 414 59T463 140Q466 150 469 151T485 153H489Q504 153 504 145Q504 144 502 134Q486 77 440 33T333 -11Q263 -11 227 52Q186 -10 133 -10H127Q78 -10 57 16T35 71Q35 103 54 123T99 143Q142 143 142 101Q142 81 130 66T107 46T94 41L91 40Q91 39 97 36T113 29T132 26Q168 26 194 71Q203 87 217 139T245 247T261 313Q266 340 266 352Q266 380 251 392T217 404Q177 404 142 372T93 290Q91 281 88 280T72 278H58Q52 284 52 289Z"></path><path id="MJX-91-TEX-N-56" d="M114 620Q113 621 110 624T107 627T103 630T98 632T91 634T80 635T67 636T48 637H19V683H28Q46 680 152 680Q273 680 294 683H305V637H284Q223 634 223 620Q223 618 313 372T404 126L490 358Q575 588 575 597Q575 616 554 626T508 637H503V683H512Q527 680 627 680Q718 680 724 683H730V637H723Q648 637 627 596Q627 595 515 291T401 -14Q396 -22 382 -22H374H367Q353 -22 348 -14Q346 -12 231 303Q114 617 114 620Z"></path><path id="MJX-91-TEX-N-32" d="M109 429Q82 429 66 447T50 491Q50 562 103 614T235 666Q326 666 387 610T449 465Q449 422 429 383T381 315T301 241Q265 210 201 149L142 93L218 92Q375 92 385 97Q392 99 409 186V189H449V186Q448 183 436 95T421 3V0H50V19V31Q50 38 56 46T86 81Q115 113 136 137Q145 147 170 174T204 211T233 244T261 278T284 308T305 340T320 369T333 401T340 431T343 464Q343 527 309 573T212 619Q179 619 154 602T119 569T109 550Q109 549 114 549Q132 549 151 535T170 489Q170 464 154 447T109 429Z"></path><path id="MJX-91-TEX-S3-7D" d="M131 1414T131 1429T133 1447T148 1450H153H167L182 1444Q276 1404 336 1343T415 1207Q421 1184 421 1154T423 851L424 531L426 517Q434 462 460 415T518 339T571 296T608 274Q615 270 616 267T618 251Q618 241 618 238T615 232T608 227Q542 194 491 132T426 -15L424 -29L423 -350Q422 -622 422 -652T415 -706Q397 -780 337 -841T182 -943L167 -949H153Q137 -949 134 -946T131 -928Q131 -914 132 -911T144 -904Q146 -903 148 -902Q299 -820 323 -680Q324 -663 325 -349T327 -19Q355 145 541 241L561 250L541 260Q356 355 327 520Q326 537 325 850T323 1181Q315 1227 293 1267T244 1332T193 1374T151 1401T132 1413Q131 1414 131 1429Z"></path><path id="MJX-91-TEX-N-31" d="M213 578L200 573Q186 568 160 563T102 556H83V602H102Q149 604 189 617T245 641T273 663Q275 666 285 666Q294 666 302 660V361L303 61Q310 54 315 52T339 48T401 46H427V0H416Q395 3 257 3Q121 3 100 0H88V46H114Q136 46 152 46T177 47T193 50T201 52T207 57T213 61V578Z"></path><path id="MJX-91-TEX-N-2E" d="M78 60Q78 84 95 102T138 120Q162 120 180 104T199 61Q199 36 182 18T139 0T96 17T78 60Z"></path></defs><g stroke="currentColor" fill="currentColor" stroke-width="0" transform="scale(1,-1)"><g ><g ><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-91-TEX-N-54"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(999.8,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-91-TEX-N-3D"></use></g><g transform="translate(2055.6,0)"><g transform="translate(221.8,1409.5)"><g transform="translate(0 -0.5)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-91-TEX-S3-7B"></use></g><g transform="translate(750,0)"><g ><g transform="translate(220,676)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-91-TEX-I-1D461"></use></g><g transform="translate(583.2,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-91-TEX-N-2212"></use></g><g transform="translate(1583.4,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-91-TEX-I-1D463"></use></g><g transform="translate(2068.4,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-91-TEX-I-1D465"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(946.9,-719.9)"><g ><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-91-TEX-N-56"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(783,289) scale(0.707)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-91-TEX-N-32"></use></g></g><rect width="2840.4" height="60" x="120" y="220"></rect></g></g><g transform="translate(3830.4,0) translate(0 -0.5)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-91-TEX-S3-7D"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(220,-1469.9)"><g transform="translate(0 -0.5)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-91-TEX-S3-7B"></use></g><g transform="translate(750,0)"><g ><g transform="translate(220,676)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-91-TEX-N-31"></use></g><g transform="translate(722.2,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-91-TEX-N-2212"></use></g><g transform="translate(1722.4,0)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-91-TEX-I-1D463"></use></g><g transform="translate(518,363) scale(0.707)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-91-TEX-N-32"></use></g></g></g><g transform="translate(948.7,-719.9)"><g ><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-91-TEX-N-56"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(783,289) scale(0.707)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-91-TEX-N-32"></use></g></g><rect width="2844" height="60" x="120" y="220"></rect></g></g><g transform="translate(3834,0) translate(0 -0.5)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-91-TEX-S3-7D"></use></g></g><rect width="4784" height="60" x="120" y="220"></rect></g><g transform="translate(7079.6,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-91-TEX-N-2E"></use></g></g></g></svg>
\ No newline at end of file diff --git a/77011-h/images/38.svg b/77011-h/images/38.svg new file mode 100644 index 0000000..db7411b --- /dev/null +++ b/77011-h/images/38.svg @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +<svg version="1.1" style="vertical-align: -2.194ex;" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="10093.7px" height="2429.9px" viewBox="0 -1460 10093.7 2429.9" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><defs><path id="MJX-92-TEX-N-54" d="M36 443Q37 448 46 558T55 671V677H666V671Q667 666 676 556T685 443V437H645V443Q645 445 642 478T631 544T610 593Q593 614 555 625Q534 630 478 630H451H443Q417 630 414 618Q413 616 413 339V63Q420 53 439 50T528 46H558V0H545L361 3Q186 1 177 0H164V46H194Q264 46 283 49T309 63V339V550Q309 620 304 625T271 630H244H224Q154 630 119 601Q101 585 93 554T81 486T76 443V437H36V443Z"></path><path id="MJX-92-TEX-N-31" d="M213 578L200 573Q186 568 160 563T102 556H83V602H102Q149 604 189 617T245 641T273 663Q275 666 285 666Q294 666 302 660V361L303 61Q310 54 315 52T339 48T401 46H427V0H416Q395 3 257 3Q121 3 100 0H88V46H114Q136 46 152 46T177 47T193 50T201 52T207 57T213 61V578Z"></path><path id="MJX-92-TEX-N-2212" d="M84 237T84 250T98 270H679Q694 262 694 250T679 230H98Q84 237 84 250Z"></path><path id="MJX-92-TEX-N-32" d="M109 429Q82 429 66 447T50 491Q50 562 103 614T235 666Q326 666 387 610T449 465Q449 422 429 383T381 315T301 241Q265 210 201 149L142 93L218 92Q375 92 385 97Q392 99 409 186V189H449V186Q448 183 436 95T421 3V0H50V19V31Q50 38 56 46T86 81Q115 113 136 137Q145 147 170 174T204 211T233 244T261 278T284 308T305 340T320 369T333 401T340 431T343 464Q343 527 309 573T212 619Q179 619 154 602T119 569T109 550Q109 549 114 549Q132 549 151 535T170 489Q170 464 154 447T109 429Z"></path><path id="MJX-92-TEX-N-3D" d="M56 347Q56 360 70 367H707Q722 359 722 347Q722 336 708 328L390 327H72Q56 332 56 347ZM56 153Q56 168 72 173H708Q722 163 722 153Q722 140 707 133H70Q56 140 56 153Z"></path><path id="MJX-92-TEX-I-1D463" d="M173 380Q173 405 154 405Q130 405 104 376T61 287Q60 286 59 284T58 281T56 279T53 278T49 278T41 278H27Q21 284 21 287Q21 294 29 316T53 368T97 419T160 441Q202 441 225 417T249 361Q249 344 246 335Q246 329 231 291T200 202T182 113Q182 86 187 69Q200 26 250 26Q287 26 319 60T369 139T398 222T409 277Q409 300 401 317T383 343T365 361T357 383Q357 405 376 424T417 443Q436 443 451 425T467 367Q467 340 455 284T418 159T347 40T241 -11Q177 -11 139 22Q102 54 102 117Q102 148 110 181T151 298Q173 362 173 380Z"></path><path id="MJX-92-TEX-N-28" d="M94 250Q94 319 104 381T127 488T164 576T202 643T244 695T277 729T302 750H315H319Q333 750 333 741Q333 738 316 720T275 667T226 581T184 443T167 250T184 58T225 -81T274 -167T316 -220T333 -241Q333 -250 318 -250H315H302L274 -226Q180 -141 137 -14T94 250Z"></path><path id="MJX-92-TEX-I-1D465" d="M52 289Q59 331 106 386T222 442Q257 442 286 424T329 379Q371 442 430 442Q467 442 494 420T522 361Q522 332 508 314T481 292T458 288Q439 288 427 299T415 328Q415 374 465 391Q454 404 425 404Q412 404 406 402Q368 386 350 336Q290 115 290 78Q290 50 306 38T341 26Q378 26 414 59T463 140Q466 150 469 151T485 153H489Q504 153 504 145Q504 144 502 134Q486 77 440 33T333 -11Q263 -11 227 52Q186 -10 133 -10H127Q78 -10 57 16T35 71Q35 103 54 123T99 143Q142 143 142 101Q142 81 130 66T107 46T94 41L91 40Q91 39 97 36T113 29T132 26Q168 26 194 71Q203 87 217 139T245 247T261 313Q266 340 266 352Q266 380 251 392T217 404Q177 404 142 372T93 290Q91 281 88 280T72 278H58Q52 284 52 289Z"></path><path id="MJX-92-TEX-N-29" d="M60 749L64 750Q69 750 74 750H86L114 726Q208 641 251 514T294 250Q294 182 284 119T261 12T224 -76T186 -143T145 -194T113 -227T90 -246Q87 -249 86 -250H74Q66 -250 63 -250T58 -247T55 -238Q56 -237 66 -225Q221 -64 221 250T66 725Q56 737 55 738Q55 746 60 749Z"></path><path id="MJX-92-TEX-N-56" d="M114 620Q113 621 110 624T107 627T103 630T98 632T91 634T80 635T67 636T48 637H19V683H28Q46 680 152 680Q273 680 294 683H305V637H284Q223 634 223 620Q223 618 313 372T404 126L490 358Q575 588 575 597Q575 616 554 626T508 637H503V683H512Q527 680 627 680Q718 680 724 683H730V637H723Q648 637 627 596Q627 595 515 291T401 -14Q396 -22 382 -22H374H367Q353 -22 348 -14Q346 -12 231 303Q114 617 114 620Z"></path><path id="MJX-92-TEX-N-2E" d="M78 60Q78 84 95 102T138 120Q162 120 180 104T199 61Q199 36 182 18T139 0T96 17T78 60Z"></path></defs><g stroke="currentColor" fill="currentColor" stroke-width="0" transform="scale(1,-1)"><g ><g ><g ><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-92-TEX-N-54"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(755,-150) scale(0.707)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-92-TEX-N-31"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(1380.8,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-92-TEX-N-2212"></use></g><g transform="translate(2381,0)"><g ><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-92-TEX-N-54"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(755,-150) scale(0.707)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-92-TEX-N-32"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(3817.3,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-92-TEX-N-3D"></use></g><g transform="translate(4873.1,0)"><g transform="translate(220,710)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-92-TEX-I-1D463"></use></g><g transform="translate(485,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-92-TEX-N-28"></use></g><g transform="translate(874,0)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-92-TEX-I-1D465"></use></g><g transform="translate(605,-150) scale(0.707)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-92-TEX-N-32"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(2104.8,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-92-TEX-N-2212"></use></g><g transform="translate(3105,0)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-92-TEX-I-1D465"></use></g><g transform="translate(605,-150) scale(0.707)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-92-TEX-N-31"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(4113.6,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-92-TEX-N-29"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(417,-719.9)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-92-TEX-N-28"></use></g><g transform="translate(389,0)"><g ><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-92-TEX-N-56"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(783,289) scale(0.707)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-92-TEX-N-32"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(1797.8,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-92-TEX-N-2212"></use></g><g transform="translate(2798,0)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-92-TEX-I-1D463"></use></g><g transform="translate(518,289) scale(0.707)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-92-TEX-N-32"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(3719.6,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-92-TEX-N-29"></use></g></g><rect width="4702.6" height="60" x="120" y="220"></rect></g><g transform="translate(9815.7,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-92-TEX-N-2E"></use></g></g></g></svg>
\ No newline at end of file diff --git a/77011-h/images/4.svg b/77011-h/images/4.svg new file mode 100644 index 0000000..2ca28af --- /dev/null +++ b/77011-h/images/4.svg @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +<svg version="1.1" style="vertical-align: -0.439ex;" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="566px" height="899px" viewBox="0 -705 566 899" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><defs><path id="MJX-83-TEX-I-1D6FD" d="M29 -194Q23 -188 23 -186Q23 -183 102 134T186 465Q208 533 243 584T309 658Q365 705 429 705H431Q493 705 533 667T573 570Q573 465 469 396L482 383Q533 332 533 252Q533 139 448 65T257 -10Q227 -10 203 -2T165 17T143 40T131 59T126 65L62 -188Q60 -194 42 -194H29ZM353 431Q392 431 427 419L432 422Q436 426 439 429T449 439T461 453T472 471T484 495T493 524T501 560Q503 569 503 593Q503 611 502 616Q487 667 426 667Q384 667 347 643T286 582T247 514T224 455Q219 439 186 308T152 168Q151 163 151 147Q151 99 173 68Q204 26 260 26Q302 26 349 51T425 137Q441 171 449 214T457 279Q457 337 422 372Q380 358 347 358H337Q258 358 258 389Q258 396 261 403Q275 431 353 431Z"></path></defs><g stroke="currentColor" fill="currentColor" stroke-width="0" transform="scale(1,-1)"><g ><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-83-TEX-I-1D6FD"></use></g></g></g></svg>
\ No newline at end of file diff --git a/77011-h/images/5.svg b/77011-h/images/5.svg new file mode 100644 index 0000000..1942cd0 --- /dev/null +++ b/77011-h/images/5.svg @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +<svg version="1.1" style="vertical-align: -0.489ex;" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="517px" height="658px" viewBox="0 -442 517 658" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><defs><path id="MJX-65-TEX-I-1D70C" d="M58 -216Q25 -216 23 -186Q23 -176 73 26T127 234Q143 289 182 341Q252 427 341 441Q343 441 349 441T359 442Q432 442 471 394T510 276Q510 219 486 165T425 74T345 13T266 -10H255H248Q197 -10 165 35L160 41L133 -71Q108 -168 104 -181T92 -202Q76 -216 58 -216ZM424 322Q424 359 407 382T357 405Q322 405 287 376T231 300Q217 269 193 170L176 102Q193 26 260 26Q298 26 334 62Q367 92 389 158T418 266T424 322Z"></path></defs><g stroke="currentColor" fill="currentColor" stroke-width="0" transform="scale(1,-1)"><g ><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-65-TEX-I-1D70C"></use></g></g></g></svg>
\ No newline at end of file diff --git a/77011-h/images/6.svg b/77011-h/images/6.svg new file mode 100644 index 0000000..2c2b551 --- /dev/null +++ b/77011-h/images/6.svg @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +<svg version="1.1" style="vertical-align: -0.489ex;" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="2638.3px" height="921px" viewBox="0 -705 2638.3 921" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><defs><path id="MJX-50-TEX-I-1D6FC" d="M34 156Q34 270 120 356T309 442Q379 442 421 402T478 304Q484 275 485 237V208Q534 282 560 374Q564 388 566 390T582 393Q603 393 603 385Q603 376 594 346T558 261T497 161L486 147L487 123Q489 67 495 47T514 26Q528 28 540 37T557 60Q559 67 562 68T577 70Q597 70 597 62Q597 56 591 43Q579 19 556 5T512 -10H505Q438 -10 414 62L411 69L400 61Q390 53 370 41T325 18T267 -2T203 -11Q124 -11 79 39T34 156ZM208 26Q257 26 306 47T379 90L403 112Q401 255 396 290Q382 405 304 405Q235 405 183 332Q156 292 139 224T121 120Q121 71 146 49T208 26Z"></path><path id="MJX-50-TEX-N-2C" d="M78 35T78 60T94 103T137 121Q165 121 187 96T210 8Q210 -27 201 -60T180 -117T154 -158T130 -185T117 -194Q113 -194 104 -185T95 -172Q95 -168 106 -156T131 -126T157 -76T173 -3V9L172 8Q170 7 167 6T161 3T152 1T140 0Q113 0 96 17Z"></path><path id="MJX-50-TEX-I-1D6FD" d="M29 -194Q23 -188 23 -186Q23 -183 102 134T186 465Q208 533 243 584T309 658Q365 705 429 705H431Q493 705 533 667T573 570Q573 465 469 396L482 383Q533 332 533 252Q533 139 448 65T257 -10Q227 -10 203 -2T165 17T143 40T131 59T126 65L62 -188Q60 -194 42 -194H29ZM353 431Q392 431 427 419L432 422Q436 426 439 429T449 439T461 453T472 471T484 495T493 524T501 560Q503 569 503 593Q503 611 502 616Q487 667 426 667Q384 667 347 643T286 582T247 514T224 455Q219 439 186 308T152 168Q151 163 151 147Q151 99 173 68Q204 26 260 26Q302 26 349 51T425 137Q441 171 449 214T457 279Q457 337 422 372Q380 358 347 358H337Q258 358 258 389Q258 396 261 403Q275 431 353 431Z"></path><path id="MJX-50-TEX-I-1D6FE" d="M31 249Q11 249 11 258Q11 275 26 304T66 365T129 418T206 441Q233 441 239 440Q287 429 318 386T371 255Q385 195 385 170Q385 166 386 166L398 193Q418 244 443 300T486 391T508 430Q510 431 524 431H537Q543 425 543 422Q543 418 522 378T463 251T391 71Q385 55 378 6T357 -100Q341 -165 330 -190T303 -216Q286 -216 286 -188Q286 -138 340 32L346 51L347 69Q348 79 348 100Q348 257 291 317Q251 355 196 355Q148 355 108 329T51 260Q49 251 47 251Q45 249 31 249Z"></path></defs><g stroke="currentColor" fill="currentColor" stroke-width="0" transform="scale(1,-1)"><g ><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-50-TEX-I-1D6FC"></use></g><g transform="translate(640,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-50-TEX-N-2C"></use></g><g transform="translate(1084.7,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-50-TEX-I-1D6FD"></use></g><g transform="translate(1650.7,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-50-TEX-N-2C"></use></g><g transform="translate(2095.3,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-50-TEX-I-1D6FE"></use></g></g></g></svg>
\ No newline at end of file diff --git a/77011-h/images/7.svg b/77011-h/images/7.svg new file mode 100644 index 0000000..12d6d60 --- /dev/null +++ b/77011-h/images/7.svg @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +<svg version="1.1" style="vertical-align: -0.566ex;" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="17414.4px" height="1000px" viewBox="0 -750 17414.4 1000" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><defs><path id="MJX-52-TEX-N-58" d="M270 0Q252 3 141 3Q46 3 31 0H23V46H40Q129 50 161 88Q165 94 244 216T324 339Q324 341 235 480T143 622Q133 631 119 634T57 637H37V683H46Q64 680 172 680Q297 680 318 683H329V637H324Q307 637 286 632T263 621Q263 618 322 525T384 431Q385 431 437 511T489 593Q490 595 490 599Q490 611 477 622T436 637H428V683H437Q455 680 566 680Q661 680 676 683H684V637H667Q585 634 551 599Q548 596 478 491Q412 388 412 387Q412 385 514 225T620 62Q628 53 642 50T695 46H726V0H717Q699 3 591 3Q466 3 445 0H434V46H440Q454 46 476 51T499 64Q499 67 463 124T390 238L353 295L350 292Q348 290 343 283T331 265T312 236T286 195Q219 88 218 84Q218 70 234 59T272 46H280V0H270Z"></path><path id="MJX-52-TEX-N-3D" d="M56 347Q56 360 70 367H707Q722 359 722 347Q722 336 708 328L390 327H72Q56 332 56 347ZM56 153Q56 168 72 173H708Q722 163 722 153Q722 140 707 133H70Q56 140 56 153Z"></path><path id="MJX-52-TEX-I-1D6FD" d="M29 -194Q23 -188 23 -186Q23 -183 102 134T186 465Q208 533 243 584T309 658Q365 705 429 705H431Q493 705 533 667T573 570Q573 465 469 396L482 383Q533 332 533 252Q533 139 448 65T257 -10Q227 -10 203 -2T165 17T143 40T131 59T126 65L62 -188Q60 -194 42 -194H29ZM353 431Q392 431 427 419L432 422Q436 426 439 429T449 439T461 453T472 471T484 495T493 524T501 560Q503 569 503 593Q503 611 502 616Q487 667 426 667Q384 667 347 643T286 582T247 514T224 455Q219 439 186 308T152 168Q151 163 151 147Q151 99 173 68Q204 26 260 26Q302 26 349 51T425 137Q441 171 449 214T457 279Q457 337 422 372Q380 358 347 358H337Q258 358 258 389Q258 396 261 403Q275 431 353 431Z"></path><path id="MJX-52-TEX-I-1D465" d="M52 289Q59 331 106 386T222 442Q257 442 286 424T329 379Q371 442 430 442Q467 442 494 420T522 361Q522 332 508 314T481 292T458 288Q439 288 427 299T415 328Q415 374 465 391Q454 404 425 404Q412 404 406 402Q368 386 350 336Q290 115 290 78Q290 50 306 38T341 26Q378 26 414 59T463 140Q466 150 469 151T485 153H489Q504 153 504 145Q504 144 502 134Q486 77 440 33T333 -11Q263 -11 227 52Q186 -10 133 -10H127Q78 -10 57 16T35 71Q35 103 54 123T99 143Q142 143 142 101Q142 81 130 66T107 46T94 41L91 40Q91 39 97 36T113 29T132 26Q168 26 194 71Q203 87 217 139T245 247T261 313Q266 340 266 352Q266 380 251 392T217 404Q177 404 142 372T93 290Q91 281 88 280T72 278H58Q52 284 52 289Z"></path><path id="MJX-52-TEX-N-2C" d="M78 35T78 60T94 103T137 121Q165 121 187 96T210 8Q210 -27 201 -60T180 -117T154 -158T130 -185T117 -194Q113 -194 104 -185T95 -172Q95 -168 106 -156T131 -126T157 -76T173 -3V9L172 8Q170 7 167 6T161 3T152 1T140 0Q113 0 96 17Z"></path><path id="MJX-52-TEX-N-59" d="M518 0Q497 3 374 3Q253 3 232 0H221V46H254Q313 47 321 58Q324 62 324 167V273L221 446Q117 620 114 623Q106 631 91 634T31 637H11V683H20Q29 680 148 680Q273 680 294 683H305V637H287Q239 636 236 621Q236 619 321 475L407 332L483 460Q502 492 527 534Q563 594 563 604Q563 632 517 637H508V683H517H525Q533 683 545 683T571 682T600 681T626 681Q695 681 731 683H738V637H723Q640 633 613 588Q612 587 517 427L425 273V169V95Q425 66 428 59T444 49Q459 46 506 46H528V0H518Z"></path><path id="MJX-52-TEX-I-1D6FE" d="M31 249Q11 249 11 258Q11 275 26 304T66 365T129 418T206 441Q233 441 239 440Q287 429 318 386T371 255Q385 195 385 170Q385 166 386 166L398 193Q418 244 443 300T486 391T508 430Q510 431 524 431H537Q543 425 543 422Q543 418 522 378T463 251T391 71Q385 55 378 6T357 -100Q341 -165 330 -190T303 -216Q286 -216 286 -188Q286 -138 340 32L346 51L347 69Q348 79 348 100Q348 257 291 317Q251 355 196 355Q148 355 108 329T51 260Q49 251 47 251Q45 249 31 249Z"></path><path id="MJX-52-TEX-I-1D466" d="M21 287Q21 301 36 335T84 406T158 442Q199 442 224 419T250 355Q248 336 247 334Q247 331 231 288T198 191T182 105Q182 62 196 45T238 27Q261 27 281 38T312 61T339 94Q339 95 344 114T358 173T377 247Q415 397 419 404Q432 431 462 431Q475 431 483 424T494 412T496 403Q496 390 447 193T391 -23Q363 -106 294 -155T156 -205Q111 -205 77 -183T43 -117Q43 -95 50 -80T69 -58T89 -48T106 -45Q150 -45 150 -87Q150 -107 138 -122T115 -142T102 -147L99 -148Q101 -153 118 -160T152 -167H160Q177 -167 186 -165Q219 -156 247 -127T290 -65T313 -9T321 21L315 17Q309 13 296 6T270 -6Q250 -11 231 -11Q185 -11 150 11T104 82Q103 89 103 113Q103 170 138 262T173 379Q173 380 173 381Q173 390 173 393T169 400T158 404H154Q131 404 112 385T82 344T65 302T57 280Q55 278 41 278H27Q21 284 21 287Z"></path><path id="MJX-52-TEX-N-5A" d="M69 443Q69 452 74 554T80 683H549Q555 677 555 664Q555 649 554 648Q552 645 366 348T179 50T192 49T263 49H275H302Q333 49 353 50T401 59T447 78T482 115T507 173Q513 200 520 273V282H560V274Q560 272 552 143T543 8V0H302L61 1L58 3Q55 8 55 21V35Q59 43 153 193T340 489T432 637H343Q259 637 214 625T141 573Q109 523 109 445Q109 443 89 443H69Z"></path><path id="MJX-52-TEX-I-1D6FF" d="M195 609Q195 656 227 686T302 717Q319 716 351 709T407 697T433 690Q451 682 451 662Q451 644 438 628T403 612Q382 612 348 641T288 671T249 657T235 628Q235 584 334 463Q401 379 401 292Q401 169 340 80T205 -10H198Q127 -10 83 36T36 153Q36 286 151 382Q191 413 252 434Q252 435 245 449T230 481T214 521T201 566T195 609ZM112 130Q112 83 136 55T204 27Q233 27 256 51T291 111T309 178T316 232Q316 267 309 298T295 344T269 400L259 396Q215 381 183 342T137 256T118 179T112 130Z"></path><path id="MJX-52-TEX-I-1D467" d="M347 338Q337 338 294 349T231 360Q211 360 197 356T174 346T162 335T155 324L153 320Q150 317 138 317Q117 317 117 325Q117 330 120 339Q133 378 163 406T229 440Q241 442 246 442Q271 442 291 425T329 392T367 375Q389 375 411 408T434 441Q435 442 449 442H462Q468 436 468 434Q468 430 463 420T449 399T432 377T418 358L411 349Q368 298 275 214T160 106L148 94L163 93Q185 93 227 82T290 71Q328 71 360 90T402 140Q406 149 409 151T424 153Q443 153 443 143Q443 138 442 134Q425 72 376 31T278 -11Q252 -11 232 6T193 40T155 57Q111 57 76 -3Q70 -11 59 -11H54H41Q35 -5 35 -2Q35 13 93 84Q132 129 225 214T340 322Q352 338 347 338Z"></path><path id="MJX-52-TEX-N-2E" d="M78 60Q78 84 95 102T138 120Q162 120 180 104T199 61Q199 36 182 18T139 0T96 17T78 60Z"></path><path id="MJX-52-TEX-N-5B" d="M118 -250V750H255V710H158V-210H255V-250H118Z"></path><path id="MJX-52-TEX-N-2260" d="M166 -215T159 -215T147 -212T141 -204T139 -197Q139 -190 144 -183L306 133H70Q56 140 56 153Q56 168 72 173H327L406 327H72Q56 332 56 347Q56 360 70 367H426Q597 702 602 707Q605 716 618 716Q625 716 630 712T636 703T638 696Q638 692 471 367H707Q722 359 722 347Q722 336 708 328L451 327L371 173H708Q722 163 722 153Q722 140 707 133H351Q175 -210 170 -212Q166 -215 159 -215Z"></path><path id="MJX-52-TEX-N-5D" d="M22 710V750H159V-250H22V-210H119V710H22Z"></path></defs><g stroke="currentColor" fill="currentColor" stroke-width="0" transform="scale(1,-1)"><g ><g ><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-52-TEX-N-58"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(1027.8,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-52-TEX-N-3D"></use></g><g transform="translate(2083.6,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-52-TEX-I-1D6FD"></use></g><g transform="translate(2649.6,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-52-TEX-I-1D465"></use></g><g transform="translate(3221.6,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-52-TEX-N-2C"></use></g><g transform="translate(3499.6,0)"><g ></g></g><g transform="translate(3666.6,0)"><g ></g></g><g transform="translate(4000.2,0)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-52-TEX-N-59"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(5028,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-52-TEX-N-3D"></use></g><g transform="translate(6083.8,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-52-TEX-I-1D6FE"></use></g><g transform="translate(6626.8,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-52-TEX-I-1D466"></use></g><g transform="translate(7116.8,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-52-TEX-N-2C"></use></g><g transform="translate(7394.8,0)"><g ></g></g><g transform="translate(7561.8,0)"><g ></g></g><g transform="translate(7895.4,0)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-52-TEX-N-5A"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(8784.2,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-52-TEX-N-3D"></use></g><g transform="translate(9840,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-52-TEX-I-1D6FF"></use></g><g transform="translate(10284,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-52-TEX-I-1D467"></use></g><g transform="translate(10749,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-52-TEX-N-2E"></use></g><g transform="translate(11027,0)"><g ></g></g><g transform="translate(12193.7,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-52-TEX-N-5B"></use></g><g transform="translate(12471.7,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-52-TEX-I-1D6FD"></use></g><g transform="translate(13315.4,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-52-TEX-N-2260"></use></g><g transform="translate(14371.2,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-52-TEX-I-1D6FE"></use></g><g transform="translate(15192,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-52-TEX-N-2260"></use></g><g transform="translate(16247.8,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-52-TEX-I-1D6FF"></use></g><g transform="translate(16691.8,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-52-TEX-N-2E"></use></g><g transform="translate(17136.4,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-52-TEX-N-5D"></use></g></g></g></svg>
\ No newline at end of file diff --git a/77011-h/images/8.svg b/77011-h/images/8.svg new file mode 100644 index 0000000..572dd74 --- /dev/null +++ b/77011-h/images/8.svg @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +<svg version="1.1" style="vertical-align: -1.991ex;" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="11341px" height="2273px" viewBox="0 -1393 11341 2273" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><defs><path id="MJX-54-TEX-N-58" d="M270 0Q252 3 141 3Q46 3 31 0H23V46H40Q129 50 161 88Q165 94 244 216T324 339Q324 341 235 480T143 622Q133 631 119 634T57 637H37V683H46Q64 680 172 680Q297 680 318 683H329V637H324Q307 637 286 632T263 621Q263 618 322 525T384 431Q385 431 437 511T489 593Q490 595 490 599Q490 611 477 622T436 637H428V683H437Q455 680 566 680Q661 680 676 683H684V637H667Q585 634 551 599Q548 596 478 491Q412 388 412 387Q412 385 514 225T620 62Q628 53 642 50T695 46H726V0H717Q699 3 591 3Q466 3 445 0H434V46H440Q454 46 476 51T499 64Q499 67 463 124T390 238L353 295L350 292Q348 290 343 283T331 265T312 236T286 195Q219 88 218 84Q218 70 234 59T272 46H280V0H270Z"></path><path id="MJX-54-TEX-N-3D" d="M56 347Q56 360 70 367H707Q722 359 722 347Q722 336 708 328L390 327H72Q56 332 56 347ZM56 153Q56 168 72 173H708Q722 163 722 153Q722 140 707 133H70Q56 140 56 153Z"></path><path id="MJX-54-TEX-I-1D465" d="M52 289Q59 331 106 386T222 442Q257 442 286 424T329 379Q371 442 430 442Q467 442 494 420T522 361Q522 332 508 314T481 292T458 288Q439 288 427 299T415 328Q415 374 465 391Q454 404 425 404Q412 404 406 402Q368 386 350 336Q290 115 290 78Q290 50 306 38T341 26Q378 26 414 59T463 140Q466 150 469 151T485 153H489Q504 153 504 145Q504 144 502 134Q486 77 440 33T333 -11Q263 -11 227 52Q186 -10 133 -10H127Q78 -10 57 16T35 71Q35 103 54 123T99 143Q142 143 142 101Q142 81 130 66T107 46T94 41L91 40Q91 39 97 36T113 29T132 26Q168 26 194 71Q203 87 217 139T245 247T261 313Q266 340 266 352Q266 380 251 392T217 404Q177 404 142 372T93 290Q91 281 88 280T72 278H58Q52 284 52 289Z"></path><path id="MJX-54-TEX-N-2C" d="M78 35T78 60T94 103T137 121Q165 121 187 96T210 8Q210 -27 201 -60T180 -117T154 -158T130 -185T117 -194Q113 -194 104 -185T95 -172Q95 -168 106 -156T131 -126T157 -76T173 -3V9L172 8Q170 7 167 6T161 3T152 1T140 0Q113 0 96 17Z"></path><path id="MJX-54-TEX-N-59" d="M518 0Q497 3 374 3Q253 3 232 0H221V46H254Q313 47 321 58Q324 62 324 167V273L221 446Q117 620 114 623Q106 631 91 634T31 637H11V683H20Q29 680 148 680Q273 680 294 683H305V637H287Q239 636 236 621Q236 619 321 475L407 332L483 460Q502 492 527 534Q563 594 563 604Q563 632 517 637H508V683H517H525Q533 683 545 683T571 682T600 681T626 681Q695 681 731 683H738V637H723Q640 633 613 588Q612 587 517 427L425 273V169V95Q425 66 428 59T444 49Q459 46 506 46H528V0H518Z"></path><path id="MJX-54-TEX-I-1D6FE" d="M31 249Q11 249 11 258Q11 275 26 304T66 365T129 418T206 441Q233 441 239 440Q287 429 318 386T371 255Q385 195 385 170Q385 166 386 166L398 193Q418 244 443 300T486 391T508 430Q510 431 524 431H537Q543 425 543 422Q543 418 522 378T463 251T391 71Q385 55 378 6T357 -100Q341 -165 330 -190T303 -216Q286 -216 286 -188Q286 -138 340 32L346 51L347 69Q348 79 348 100Q348 257 291 317Q251 355 196 355Q148 355 108 329T51 260Q49 251 47 251Q45 249 31 249Z"></path><path id="MJX-54-TEX-I-1D466" d="M21 287Q21 301 36 335T84 406T158 442Q199 442 224 419T250 355Q248 336 247 334Q247 331 231 288T198 191T182 105Q182 62 196 45T238 27Q261 27 281 38T312 61T339 94Q339 95 344 114T358 173T377 247Q415 397 419 404Q432 431 462 431Q475 431 483 424T494 412T496 403Q496 390 447 193T391 -23Q363 -106 294 -155T156 -205Q111 -205 77 -183T43 -117Q43 -95 50 -80T69 -58T89 -48T106 -45Q150 -45 150 -87Q150 -107 138 -122T115 -142T102 -147L99 -148Q101 -153 118 -160T152 -167H160Q177 -167 186 -165Q219 -156 247 -127T290 -65T313 -9T321 21L315 17Q309 13 296 6T270 -6Q250 -11 231 -11Q185 -11 150 11T104 82Q103 89 103 113Q103 170 138 262T173 379Q173 380 173 381Q173 390 173 393T169 400T158 404H154Q131 404 112 385T82 344T65 302T57 280Q55 278 41 278H27Q21 284 21 287Z"></path><path id="MJX-54-TEX-I-1D6FD" d="M29 -194Q23 -188 23 -186Q23 -183 102 134T186 465Q208 533 243 584T309 658Q365 705 429 705H431Q493 705 533 667T573 570Q573 465 469 396L482 383Q533 332 533 252Q533 139 448 65T257 -10Q227 -10 203 -2T165 17T143 40T131 59T126 65L62 -188Q60 -194 42 -194H29ZM353 431Q392 431 427 419L432 422Q436 426 439 429T449 439T461 453T472 471T484 495T493 524T501 560Q503 569 503 593Q503 611 502 616Q487 667 426 667Q384 667 347 643T286 582T247 514T224 455Q219 439 186 308T152 168Q151 163 151 147Q151 99 173 68Q204 26 260 26Q302 26 349 51T425 137Q441 171 449 214T457 279Q457 337 422 372Q380 358 347 358H337Q258 358 258 389Q258 396 261 403Q275 431 353 431Z"></path><path id="MJX-54-TEX-N-5A" d="M69 443Q69 452 74 554T80 683H549Q555 677 555 664Q555 649 554 648Q552 645 366 348T179 50T192 49T263 49H275H302Q333 49 353 50T401 59T447 78T482 115T507 173Q513 200 520 273V282H560V274Q560 272 552 143T543 8V0H302L61 1L58 3Q55 8 55 21V35Q59 43 153 193T340 489T432 637H343Q259 637 214 625T141 573Q109 523 109 445Q109 443 89 443H69Z"></path><path id="MJX-54-TEX-I-1D6FF" d="M195 609Q195 656 227 686T302 717Q319 716 351 709T407 697T433 690Q451 682 451 662Q451 644 438 628T403 612Q382 612 348 641T288 671T249 657T235 628Q235 584 334 463Q401 379 401 292Q401 169 340 80T205 -10H198Q127 -10 83 36T36 153Q36 286 151 382Q191 413 252 434Q252 435 245 449T230 481T214 521T201 566T195 609ZM112 130Q112 83 136 55T204 27Q233 27 256 51T291 111T309 178T316 232Q316 267 309 298T295 344T269 400L259 396Q215 381 183 342T137 256T118 179T112 130Z"></path><path id="MJX-54-TEX-I-1D467" d="M347 338Q337 338 294 349T231 360Q211 360 197 356T174 346T162 335T155 324L153 320Q150 317 138 317Q117 317 117 325Q117 330 120 339Q133 378 163 406T229 440Q241 442 246 442Q271 442 291 425T329 392T367 375Q389 375 411 408T434 441Q435 442 449 442H462Q468 436 468 434Q468 430 463 420T449 399T432 377T418 358L411 349Q368 298 275 214T160 106L148 94L163 93Q185 93 227 82T290 71Q328 71 360 90T402 140Q406 149 409 151T424 153Q443 153 443 143Q443 138 442 134Q425 72 376 31T278 -11Q252 -11 232 6T193 40T155 57Q111 57 76 -3Q70 -11 59 -11H54H41Q35 -5 35 -2Q35 13 93 84Q132 129 225 214T340 322Q352 338 347 338Z"></path><path id="MJX-54-TEX-N-2E" d="M78 60Q78 84 95 102T138 120Q162 120 180 104T199 61Q199 36 182 18T139 0T96 17T78 60Z"></path></defs><g stroke="currentColor" fill="currentColor" stroke-width="0" transform="scale(1,-1)"><g ><g ><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-54-TEX-N-58"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(1027.8,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-54-TEX-N-3D"></use></g><g transform="translate(2083.6,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-54-TEX-I-1D465"></use></g><g transform="translate(2655.6,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-54-TEX-N-2C"></use></g><g transform="translate(2933.6,0)"><g ></g></g><g transform="translate(3100.6,0)"><g ></g></g><g transform="translate(3434.2,0)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-54-TEX-N-59"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(4462,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-54-TEX-N-3D"></use></g><g transform="translate(5517.8,0)"><g ><g transform="translate(220,676)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-54-TEX-I-1D6FE"></use></g><g transform="translate(543,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-54-TEX-I-1D466"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(453.5,-686)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-54-TEX-I-1D6FD"></use></g><rect width="1233" height="60" x="120" y="220"></rect></g></g><g transform="translate(6990.8,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-54-TEX-N-2C"></use></g><g transform="translate(7268.8,0)"><g ></g></g><g transform="translate(7435.8,0)"><g ></g></g><g transform="translate(7769.4,0)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-54-TEX-N-5A"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(8658.2,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-54-TEX-N-3D"></use></g><g transform="translate(9714,0)"><g ><g transform="translate(220,676)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-54-TEX-I-1D6FF"></use></g><g transform="translate(444,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-54-TEX-I-1D467"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(391.5,-686)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-54-TEX-I-1D6FD"></use></g><rect width="1109" height="60" x="120" y="220"></rect></g></g><g transform="translate(11063,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-54-TEX-N-2E"></use></g></g></g></svg>
\ No newline at end of file diff --git a/77011-h/images/9.svg b/77011-h/images/9.svg new file mode 100644 index 0000000..46ef96c --- /dev/null +++ b/77011-h/images/9.svg @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +<svg version="1.1" style="vertical-align: -0.464ex;" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="7780.7px" height="1088.9px" viewBox="0 -883.9 7780.7 1088.9" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><defs><path id="MJX-55-TEX-I-1D465" d="M52 289Q59 331 106 386T222 442Q257 442 286 424T329 379Q371 442 430 442Q467 442 494 420T522 361Q522 332 508 314T481 292T458 288Q439 288 427 299T415 328Q415 374 465 391Q454 404 425 404Q412 404 406 402Q368 386 350 336Q290 115 290 78Q290 50 306 38T341 26Q378 26 414 59T463 140Q466 150 469 151T485 153H489Q504 153 504 145Q504 144 502 134Q486 77 440 33T333 -11Q263 -11 227 52Q186 -10 133 -10H127Q78 -10 57 16T35 71Q35 103 54 123T99 143Q142 143 142 101Q142 81 130 66T107 46T94 41L91 40Q91 39 97 36T113 29T132 26Q168 26 194 71Q203 87 217 139T245 247T261 313Q266 340 266 352Q266 380 251 392T217 404Q177 404 142 372T93 290Q91 281 88 280T72 278H58Q52 284 52 289Z"></path><path id="MJX-55-TEX-N-32" d="M109 429Q82 429 66 447T50 491Q50 562 103 614T235 666Q326 666 387 610T449 465Q449 422 429 383T381 315T301 241Q265 210 201 149L142 93L218 92Q375 92 385 97Q392 99 409 186V189H449V186Q448 183 436 95T421 3V0H50V19V31Q50 38 56 46T86 81Q115 113 136 137Q145 147 170 174T204 211T233 244T261 278T284 308T305 340T320 369T333 401T340 431T343 464Q343 527 309 573T212 619Q179 619 154 602T119 569T109 550Q109 549 114 549Q132 549 151 535T170 489Q170 464 154 447T109 429Z"></path><path id="MJX-55-TEX-N-2B" d="M56 237T56 250T70 270H369V420L370 570Q380 583 389 583Q402 583 409 568V270H707Q722 262 722 250T707 230H409V-68Q401 -82 391 -82H389H387Q375 -82 369 -68V230H70Q56 237 56 250Z"></path><path id="MJX-55-TEX-I-1D466" d="M21 287Q21 301 36 335T84 406T158 442Q199 442 224 419T250 355Q248 336 247 334Q247 331 231 288T198 191T182 105Q182 62 196 45T238 27Q261 27 281 38T312 61T339 94Q339 95 344 114T358 173T377 247Q415 397 419 404Q432 431 462 431Q475 431 483 424T494 412T496 403Q496 390 447 193T391 -23Q363 -106 294 -155T156 -205Q111 -205 77 -183T43 -117Q43 -95 50 -80T69 -58T89 -48T106 -45Q150 -45 150 -87Q150 -107 138 -122T115 -142T102 -147L99 -148Q101 -153 118 -160T152 -167H160Q177 -167 186 -165Q219 -156 247 -127T290 -65T313 -9T321 21L315 17Q309 13 296 6T270 -6Q250 -11 231 -11Q185 -11 150 11T104 82Q103 89 103 113Q103 170 138 262T173 379Q173 380 173 381Q173 390 173 393T169 400T158 404H154Q131 404 112 385T82 344T65 302T57 280Q55 278 41 278H27Q21 284 21 287Z"></path><path id="MJX-55-TEX-I-1D467" d="M347 338Q337 338 294 349T231 360Q211 360 197 356T174 346T162 335T155 324L153 320Q150 317 138 317Q117 317 117 325Q117 330 120 339Q133 378 163 406T229 440Q241 442 246 442Q271 442 291 425T329 392T367 375Q389 375 411 408T434 441Q435 442 449 442H462Q468 436 468 434Q468 430 463 420T449 399T432 377T418 358L411 349Q368 298 275 214T160 106L148 94L163 93Q185 93 227 82T290 71Q328 71 360 90T402 140Q406 149 409 151T424 153Q443 153 443 143Q443 138 442 134Q425 72 376 31T278 -11Q252 -11 232 6T193 40T155 57Q111 57 76 -3Q70 -11 59 -11H54H41Q35 -5 35 -2Q35 13 93 84Q132 129 225 214T340 322Q352 338 347 338Z"></path><path id="MJX-55-TEX-N-3D" d="M56 347Q56 360 70 367H707Q722 359 722 347Q722 336 708 328L390 327H72Q56 332 56 347ZM56 153Q56 168 72 173H708Q722 163 722 153Q722 140 707 133H70Q56 140 56 153Z"></path><path id="MJX-55-TEX-I-1D45F" d="M21 287Q22 290 23 295T28 317T38 348T53 381T73 411T99 433T132 442Q161 442 183 430T214 408T225 388Q227 382 228 382T236 389Q284 441 347 441H350Q398 441 422 400Q430 381 430 363Q430 333 417 315T391 292T366 288Q346 288 334 299T322 328Q322 376 378 392Q356 405 342 405Q286 405 239 331Q229 315 224 298T190 165Q156 25 151 16Q138 -11 108 -11Q95 -11 87 -5T76 7T74 17Q74 30 114 189T154 366Q154 405 128 405Q107 405 92 377T68 316T57 280Q55 278 41 278H27Q21 284 21 287Z"></path><path id="MJX-55-TEX-N-2C" d="M78 35T78 60T94 103T137 121Q165 121 187 96T210 8Q210 -27 201 -60T180 -117T154 -158T130 -185T117 -194Q113 -194 104 -185T95 -172Q95 -168 106 -156T131 -126T157 -76T173 -3V9L172 8Q170 7 167 6T161 3T152 1T140 0Q113 0 96 17Z"></path></defs><g stroke="currentColor" fill="currentColor" stroke-width="0" transform="scale(1,-1)"><g ><g ><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-55-TEX-I-1D465"></use></g><g transform="translate(605,413) scale(0.707)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-55-TEX-N-32"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(1230.8,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-55-TEX-N-2B"></use></g><g transform="translate(2231,0)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-55-TEX-I-1D466"></use></g><g transform="translate(523,413) scale(0.707)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-55-TEX-N-32"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(3379.8,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-55-TEX-N-2B"></use></g><g transform="translate(4380,0)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-55-TEX-I-1D467"></use></g><g transform="translate(498,413) scale(0.707)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-55-TEX-N-32"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(5559.3,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-55-TEX-N-3D"></use></g><g transform="translate(6615.1,0)"><g ><use xlink:href="#MJX-55-TEX-I-1D45F"></use></g><g transform="translate(484,413) scale(0.707)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-55-TEX-N-32"></use></g></g><g transform="translate(7502.7,0)"><use xlink:href="#MJX-55-TEX-N-2C"></use></g></g></g></svg>
\ No newline at end of file diff --git a/77011-h/images/cover.jpg b/77011-h/images/cover.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..e97dc7c --- /dev/null +++ b/77011-h/images/cover.jpg diff --git a/77011-h/images/title.jpg b/77011-h/images/title.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..7e02376 --- /dev/null +++ b/77011-h/images/title.jpg diff --git a/LICENSE.txt b/LICENSE.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..b5dba15 --- /dev/null +++ b/LICENSE.txt @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@ +This book, including all associated images, markup, improvements, +metadata, and any other content or labor, has been confirmed to be +in the PUBLIC DOMAIN IN THE UNITED STATES. + +Procedures for determining public domain status are described in +the "Copyright How-To" at https://www.gutenberg.org. + +No investigation has been made concerning possible copyrights in +jurisdictions other than the United States. Anyone seeking to utilize +this book outside of the United States should confirm copyright +status under the laws that apply to them. diff --git a/README.md b/README.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..1daa877 --- /dev/null +++ b/README.md @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@ +Project Gutenberg (https://www.gutenberg.org) public repository for book #77011 +(https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/77011) |
