summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authornfenwick <nfenwick@pglaf.org>2025-01-25 11:14:46 -0800
committernfenwick <nfenwick@pglaf.org>2025-01-25 11:14:46 -0800
commit763a2de9fdc27adfed8094b8fe90777a1f207757 (patch)
treeac1e0f9e37b8002fd9ca81a9277f56da479697ed
parentf3717e846b7bce8df42c9163150d26704de5576e (diff)
NormalizeHEADmain
-rw-r--r--.gitattributes4
-rw-r--r--LICENSE.txt11
-rw-r--r--README.md2
-rw-r--r--old/69879-0.txt6569
-rw-r--r--old/69879-0.zipbin134466 -> 0 bytes
-rw-r--r--old/69879-h.zipbin438160 -> 0 bytes
-rw-r--r--old/69879-h/69879-h.htm6930
-rw-r--r--old/69879-h/images/cover.jpgbin312579 -> 0 bytes
8 files changed, 17 insertions, 13499 deletions
diff --git a/.gitattributes b/.gitattributes
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..d7b82bc
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.gitattributes
@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
+*.txt text eol=lf
+*.htm text eol=lf
+*.html text eol=lf
+*.md text eol=lf
diff --git a/LICENSE.txt b/LICENSE.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..6312041
--- /dev/null
+++ b/LICENSE.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+This eBook, including all associated images, markup, improvements,
+metadata, and any other content or labor, has been confirmed to be
+in the PUBLIC DOMAIN IN THE UNITED STATES.
+
+Procedures for determining public domain status are described in
+the "Copyright How-To" at https://www.gutenberg.org.
+
+No investigation has been made concerning possible copyrights in
+jurisdictions other than the United States. Anyone seeking to utilize
+this eBook outside of the United States should confirm copyright
+status under the laws that apply to them.
diff --git a/README.md b/README.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..437d58a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/README.md
@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
+Project Gutenberg (https://www.gutenberg.org) public repository for
+eBook #69879 (https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/69879)
diff --git a/old/69879-0.txt b/old/69879-0.txt
deleted file mode 100644
index 5dcde34..0000000
--- a/old/69879-0.txt
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,6569 +0,0 @@
-The Project Gutenberg eBook of Newer ideals of peace, by Jane Addams
-
-This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States and
-most other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no restrictions
-whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms
-of the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online at
-www.gutenberg.org. If you are not located in the United States, you
-will have to check the laws of the country where you are located before
-using this eBook.
-
-Title: Newer ideals of peace
-
-Author: Jane Addams
-
-Release Date: January 26, 2023 [eBook #69879]
-
-Language: English
-
-Produced by: Emmanuel Ackerman and the Online Distributed Proofreading
- Team at https://www.pgdp.net (This file was produced from
- images generously made available by The Internet Archive)
-
-*** START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK NEWER IDEALS OF PEACE ***
-
-
-
-
-
- THE CITIZEN’S LIBRARY
-
- OF
-
- ECONOMICS, POLITICS, AND
- SOCIOLOGY
-
- EDITED BY
-
- RICHARD T. ELY, PH.D., LL.D.
-
- PROFESSOR OF POLITICAL ECONOMY,
- UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN
-
- NEWER IDEALS OF
- PEACE
-
-
-
-
- THE CITIZEN’S LIBRARY OF ECONOMICS, POLITICS, AND SOCIOLOGY
-
- _12mo._ _Half Leather_ _$1.25 net, each_
-
-
- =MONOPOLIES AND TRUSTS.= By RICHARD T. ELY, PH.D., LL.D.
-
- =THE ECONOMICS OF DISTRIBUTION.= By JOHN A. HOBSON.
-
- =WORLD POLITICS.= By PAUL S. REINSCH, PH.D., LL.B.
-
- =ECONOMIC CRISES.= By EDWARD D. JONES, PH.D.
-
- =OUTLINES OF ECONOMICS.= By RICHARD T. ELY.
-
- =GOVERNMENT IN SWITZERLAND.= BY JOHN MARTIN VINCENT, PH.D.
-
- =ESSAYS ON THE MONETARY HISTORY OF THE UNITED STATES.= By CHARLES J.
- BULLOCK, PH.D.
-
- =SOCIAL CONTROL.= By EDWARD A. ROSS, PH.D.
-
- =HISTORY OF POLITICAL PARTIES IN THE UNITED STATES.= By JESSE MACY,
- LL.D.
-
- =MUNICIPAL ENGINEERING AND SANITATION.= By M. N. BAKER, PH.B.
-
- =DEMOCRACY AND SOCIAL ETHICS.= By JANE ADDAMS, LL.D.
-
- =COLONIAL GOVERNMENT.= By PAUL S. REINSCH, PH.D., LL.B.
-
- =AMERICAN MUNICIPAL PROGRESS.= By CHARLES ZUEBLIN, B.D.
-
- =IRRIGATION INSTITUTIONS.= By ELWOOD MEAD, C.E., M.S.
-
- =RAILWAY LEGISLATION IN THE UNITED STATES.= By BALTHASAR H. MEYER,
- PH.D.
-
- =STUDIES IN THE EVOLUTION OF INDUSTRIAL SOCIETY.= By RICHARD T. ELY,
- PH.D., LL.D.
-
- =THE AMERICAN CITY.= By DELOS F. WILCOX, PH.D.
-
- =MONEY.= By DAVID KINLEY, PH.D.
-
- =THE FOUNDATIONS OF SOCIOLOGY.= By EDWARD A. ROSS.
-
- =THE ELEMENTS OF SOCIOLOGY.= By FRANK W. BLACKMAR, PH.D.
-
- =COLONIAL ADMINISTRATION.= By PAUL S. REINSCH, PH.D., LL.B.
-
- =AN INTRODUCTION TO THE STUDY OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS.= By HENRY C.
- TAYLOR, M.S.AGR., PH.D.
-
- =SOME ETHICAL GAINS THROUGH LEGISLATION.= By FLORENCE KELLEY.
-
- =INTRODUCTION TO BUSINESS ORGANIZATION.= By SAMUEL E. SPARLING, PH.D.
-
- =THE NEWER IDEALS OF PEACE.= By JANE ADDAMS, LL.D.
-
-
- THE MACMILLAN COMPANY
- 64-66 FIFTH AVENUE
- NEW YORK
-
-
-
-
- _THE CITIZEN’S LIBRARY_
-
-
- Newer Ideals of Peace
-
-
- BY
- JANE ADDAMS
-
- HULL-HOUSE, CHICAGO, AUTHOR OF “DEMOCRACY
- AND SOCIAL ETHICS,” ETC.
-
-
- New York
- THE MACMILLAN COMPANY
- LONDON: MACMILLAN & CO., LTD.
- 1906
- _All rights reserved_
-
-
-
-
- Copyrighted 1906
- By THE MACMILLAN COMPANY
-
- Set up, electrotyped. Printed December, 1906
-
-
- THE MASON-HENRY PRESS
- SYRACUSE, NEW YORK
-
-
-
-
- TO
- Hull-House
- AND
- its Neighbors
-
-
-
-
- PREFATORY NOTE
-
-
-These studies in the gradual development of the moral substitutes for
-war have been made in the industrial quarter of a cosmopolitan city
-where the morality exhibits marked social and international aspects.
-
-Parts of two chapters have been published before in the form of
-addresses, and two others as articles in the _North American Review_
-and in the _American Journal of Sociology_. All of them however are
-held together by a conviction that has been maturing through many years.
-
- Hull-House,
- Chicago.
-
-
-
-
- CONTENTS
-
-
- CHAPTER I
-
- INTRODUCTION
-
- Newer ideals of peace are dynamic; if made operative
- will do away with war as a natural process 3
-
- Of the older ideals the appeal to pity is dogmatic 4
-
- The appeal to the sense of prudence also dogmatic
- and at this moment seems impotent 5
-
- Outlook for universal peace by international arbitration 6
-
- Primitive and profound impulses operate against impulse
- to war 8
-
- Appeal to pity and prudence unnecessary if the cosmopolitan
- interest in human affairs is utilized 9
-
- Social morality originates in social affections 11
-
- Emotion determines social relations in the poorer
- quarters of a cosmopolitan city 13
-
- New immigrants develop phenomenal powers of association 14
-
- Their ideal of government includes kindliness as
- well as protection 15
-
- Crowded city quarters the focal point of governmental
- progress 16
-
- Life at these points must shape itself with reference
- to the demands of social justice 17
-
- Simple foundations laid there for an international
- order 18
-
- Ideals formed “in the depth of anonymous life” make
- for realization 20
-
- Impulses toward compassionate conduct imperative 21
-
- The internationalism of good will foreseen by the
- philosopher 23
-
- A quickening concern for human welfare; international
- aspects illustrated by world-wide efforts
- to eradicate tuberculosis, first signs of the substitution
- of nurture for warfare 25
-
- This substitution will be a natural process 26
-
- Our very hope for it, a surrender to the ideals of the
- humble 27
-
- Accounting must be taken between survivals of militarism
- and manifestations of newer humanitarianism 28
-
- Tendency to idealization marked eighteenth-century
- humanitarian 29
-
- Newer ideals of this century sustained only by
- knowledge and companionship 30
-
-
- CHAPTER II
-
- SURVIVALS OF MILITARISM IN CITY GOVERNMENT
-
- American Republic founded under the influence of
- doctrinaire eighteenth-century ideals. Failure in
- municipal administration largely due to their inadequacy 31
-
- Modern substitutes of the evolutionary conception of
- progress for eighteenth-century idealism 32
-
- Failure of adjustment between the old form of government
- and present condition results in reversion
- to military and legal type 34
-
- National governmental machinery provides no vehicle
- for organized expression of popular will 35
-
- Historic governments dependent upon force of arms 36
-
- Founders placed too exclusive a value upon the
- principles defended by the War of the Revolution.
- Example of the overestimation of the
- spoils of war 37
-
- Immigration problem an illustration of the failure
- to treat our growing Republic in a spirit of progressive
- and developing democracy 39
-
- Present immigration due partly to the philosophic
- dogmas of the eighteenth-century. Theory of
- naturalization still rests upon those dogmas 40
-
- No adequate formulization of newer philosophy although
- immigration situation has become much
- more industrial than political 42
-
- Exploitation of immigrants carried on under guise of
- preparation for citizenship 46
-
- Failure to develop a government fitted to varied
- peoples 48
-
- Attitude of contempt for immigrant survival of a
- spirit of conqueror toward inferior people 49
-
- Contempt reflected by children toward immigrant
- parents 50
-
- Universal franchise implies a recognition of social
- needs and ideals 52
-
- Difficulties of administering repressive government in
- a democracy 54
-
- The attempt inevitably develops the corrupt politician
- as a friend of the vicious 56
-
- He must be followed by successive reformers who
- represent the righteous and protect tax interests 57
-
- Illustration from the point of view of humble people 58
-
- Dramatic see-saw must continue until we attain the
- ideals of an evolutionary democracy 59
-
- Community divided into repressive and repressed,
- representing conqueror and conquered 60
-
-
- CHAPTER III
-
- FAILURE TO UTILIZE IMMIGRANTS IN CITY GOVERNMENT
-
- Democratic governments must reckon with the unsuccessful
- if only because they represent majority
- of citizens 62
-
- To demand protection from unsuccessful is to fail
- in self-government 63
-
- Study of immigrants might develop result in revived
- enthusiasm for human possibilities reacting upon
- ideals of government 64
-
- Social resources of immigrants wasted through want
- of recognition of old habits 65
-
- Illustrated by South Italians’ ability to combine community
- life with agricultural occupations, which
- is disregarded 66
-
- Anglo-Saxon distrust of experiments with land tenure
- and taxation illustrated by Doukhobors 67
-
- Immigrant’s contribution to city life 69
-
- Military ideals blind statesmen to connection between
- social life and government 70
-
- Corrupt politician who sees the connection often first
- friend of immigrant 71
-
- Real statesmen would work out scheme of naturalization
- founded upon social needs 72
-
- Intelligent co-operation of immigrants necessary for
- advancing social legislation 74
-
- Daily experience of immigrants not to be ignored as
- basis of patriotism 75
-
- Lack of cosmopolitan standard widens gulf between
- immigrant parents and children 78
-
- Government is developing most rapidly in its relation
- to the young criminal and to the poor and dependent 79
-
- Denver Juvenile Court is significant in its attitude
- toward repressive government 81
-
- Good education in reform schools indicates compunction
- on the part of the State 83
-
- Government functions extended to care of defectives
- and dependents 84
-
- Ignores normal needs of every citizen 85
-
- Socialists would meet the needs of workingmen by
- socialized legislation, but refuse to deal with the
- present state 86
-
- At present radical changes must come from forces
- outside life of the people 87
-
- Imperial governments are now concerning themselves
- with primitive essential needs of workingmen 88
-
- Republics restrict functions of the government 90
-
- Is America, in clinging to eighteenth-century traditions,
- losing its belief in the average man? 91
-
-
- CHAPTER IV
-
- MILITARISM AND INDUSTRIAL LEGISLATION
-
- American cities slow to consider immigration in relation
- to industry 93
-
- Workingmen alone must regard them in relation
- to industrial situations 94
-
- Assimilation of immigrants by workingman due both
- to economic pressure and to idealism 95
-
- Illustrated by Stock Yards Strike 96
-
- And by the strike in Anthracite Coal Fields 97
-
- In the latter aroused public opinion forced Federal
- Government to deal with industrial conditions 98
-
- In complicated modern society not always easy to
- see where social order lies 101
-
- Chicago Stock Yards Strike illustrates such a situation 104
-
- Government should have gained the enthusiasm immigrants
- gave to union 107
-
- War element an essential part of strike 109
-
- Appeal to loyalty the nearest approach to a moral
- appeal 110
-
- Reluctance of United States Government to recognize
- matters of industry as germane to government 112
-
- Resulting neglect of civic duty 113
-
- The workingman’s attitude toward war as expressed
- by his international organization 114
-
- Commerce the modern representative of conquest 116
-
- Standard of life should be the test of a nation’s prosperity,
- so recognized by workingmen 117
-
- Social amelioration undertaken by those in closest
- contact with social maladjustments 118
-
- Present difficulties in social reform will continue
- until class interests are subordinated to a broader
- conception of social progress 119
-
- If self-government were inaugurated by advanced
- thinkers now, they would make research into
- early forms of industrial governments 121
-
- Autocratic European governments have recognized
- workingman’s need of protection 122
-
- Has Democracy a right to refuse this protection? 123
-
-
- CHAPTER V
-
- GROUP MORALITY IN THE LABOR MOVEMENT
-
- Industrial changes which belong to the community
- as a whole have unfortunately divided it into
- two camps 124
-
- These are typified by Employers’ Associations and
- Trades Unions each developing a group morality 125
-
- Trade Unions at present illustrate the eternal compromise
- between the inner concept and the outer
- act 127
-
- Present moment one of crisis in Trades Union development 128
-
- Newly organized unions in war state of development
- responsible for serious mistakes 130
-
- Tacit admission that a strike is war made during the
- Teamsters’ Strike in Chicago in 1905 132
-
- Temporary loss of belief in industrial arbitration 134
-
- Teamsters’ Strike not adjudicated in court threw the
- entire city into state of warfare 136
-
- New organizations of employers exhibit traits
- of militant youth 138
-
- Public although powerless to intervene, sees grave
- social consequences 140
-
- Division of community into classes; increase of race
- animosity; spirit of materialism 141
-
- Class prejudice created among children still another
- social consequence 142
-
- Disastrous effect of prolonged warfare upon the
- labor movement itself 144
-
- Real effort of trades unions at present is for recognition
- of the principle of collective bargaining 145
-
- Trades unions are forced to correct industrial ills
- inherent in the factory system itself 146
-
- Illustration from limitation of output 147
-
- Illustration from attitude towards improved machinery 148
-
- Disregard of the machine as a social product makes
- for group morality on the part of the owner and
- employees 149
-
- Contempt resulting from group morality justifies
- method of warfare 150
-
-
- CHAPTER VI
-
- PROTECTION OF CHILDREN FOR INDUSTRIAL EFFICIENCY
-
- Deficiency in protective legislation 151
-
- Contempt for immigrant because of his economic
- standing 152
-
- National indifference to condition of working children 154
-
- Temptation to use child labor peculiar to this industrial
- epoch 155
-
- Our sensibilities deadened by familiarity 155
-
- Protection of the young the concern of government 156
-
- Effect of premature labor on the child 158
-
- Effect of child labor on the family 161
-
- Effect on the industrial product 162
-
- Effect on civilization 163
-
- Intelligent labor the most valuable asset of our industrial
- prosperity 164
-
- Results of England’s foreign commercial policy 165
-
- Lack of consistency in the relation of the state to the
- child in the United States 166
-
- Failure of public school system to connect with
- present industrial development 167
-
- Correlation of new education with industrial situation 168
-
- Child labor legislation will secure to child its proper
- play period 169
-
- Power of association developed through play 171
-
- Co-operation, not coercion, the ideal factory discipline 173
-
- Actual factory system divorced from the instinct of
- workmanship 174
-
- The activity of youth should be valuable assets for
- citizenship as well as industry 175
-
- Military survivals in city government destroys this
- asset 176
-
- The gang a training school for group morality 177
-
- Concern of modern government in the development
- of its citizens 179
-
-
- CHAPTER VII
-
- UTILIZATION OF WOMEN IN CITY GOVERNMENT
-
- The modern city founded upon military ideals 180
-
- Early franchise justly given to grown men on basis
- of military duty 181
-
- This early test no longer fitted to the modern city
- whose problems are internal 182
-
- Women’s experience in household details valuable to
- civic housekeeping. No method of making it
- available 184
-
- Municipal suffrage to be regarded not as a right or a
- privilege, but as a piece of governmental machinery 187
-
- Franchise not only valuable as exercised by educated
- women, matters to be decided upon too basic
- to be influenced by modern education 188
-
- Census of 1900 shows greater increase of workingwomen
- than of men and increasing youth of
- working women 189
-
- Concerted action of women necessary to bring about
- industrial protection 191
-
- Women can control surroundings of their work only
- by means of franchise 192
-
- Unfair to put task of industrial protection upon
- women’s trades unions as it often confuses issues 194
-
- Closer connection between industry and government
- would result if working women were enfranchised 196
-
- Failure to educate women to industrial life disastrous
- to industry itself and to women as employers 197
-
- Situation must be viewed in relation to recent immigration
- and in connection with present stage
- of factory system in America 199
-
-
-
-
- NEWER IDEALS OF PEACE
-
-
-
-
- CHAPTER I
-
- INTRODUCTION
-
-
-The following pages present the claims of the newer, more aggressive
-ideals of peace, as over against the older dovelike ideal. These newer
-ideals are active and dynamic, and it is believed that if their forces
-were made really operative upon society, they would, in the end, quite
-as a natural process, do away with war. The older ideals have required
-fostering and recruiting, and have been held and promulgated on the
-basis of a creed. Their propaganda has been carried forward during the
-last century in nearly all civilized countries by a small body of men
-who have never ceased to cry out against war and its iniquities and who
-have preached the doctrines of peace along two great lines. The first
-has been the appeal to the higher imaginative pity, as it is found in
-the modern, moralized man. This line has been most effectively followed
-by two Russians, Count Tolstoy in his earlier writings and Verestchagin
-in his paintings. With his relentless power of reducing all life to
-personal experience Count Tolstoy drags us through the campaign of
-the common soldier in its sordidness and meanness and constant sense
-of perplexity. We see nothing of the glories we have associated with
-warfare, but learn of it as it appears to the untutored peasant who
-goes forth at the mandate of his superior to suffer hunger, cold, and
-death for issues which he does not understand, which, indeed, can have
-no moral significance to him. Verestchagin covers his canvas with
-thousands of wretched wounded and neglected dead, with the waste,
-cruelty, and squalor of war, until he forces us to question whether a
-moral issue can ever be subserved by such brutal methods.
-
-High and searching as is the preaching of these two great Russians who
-hold their art of no account save as it serves moral ends, it is still
-the appeal of dogma, and may be reduced to a command to cease from
-evil. And when this same line of appeal is presented by less gifted
-men, it often results in mere sentimentality, totally unenforced by a
-call to righteousness.
-
-The second line followed by the advocates of peace in all countries has
-been the appeal to the sense of prudence, and this again has found its
-ablest exponent in a Russian subject, the economist and banker, Jean de
-Bloch. He sets forth the cost of warfare with pitiless accuracy, and
-demonstrates that even the present armed peace is so costly that the
-burdens of it threaten social revolution in almost every country in
-Europe. Long before the reader comes to the end of de Bloch’s elaborate
-computation he is ready to cry out on the inanity of the proposition
-that the only way to secure eternal peace is to waste so much valuable
-energy and treasure in preparing for war that war becomes impossible.
-Certainly no theory could be devised which is more cumbersome, more
-roundabout, more extravagant, than the _reductio ad absurdum_ of
-the peace-secured-by-the-preparation-for-war theory. This appeal to
-prudence was constantly emphasized at the first Hague Conference and
-was shortly afterward demonstrated by Great Britain when she went to
-war in South Africa, where she was fined one hundred million pounds
-and lost ten thousand lives. The fact that Russia also, and the very
-Czar who invited the Conference, disregarded the conclusions of the
-Hague Tribunal makes this line of appeal at least for the moment seem
-impotent to influence empires which command enormous resources and
-which lodge the power of expenditure in officials who have nothing to
-do with accumulating the treasure they vote to expend.
-
-It would, however, be the height of folly for responsible statesmen
-to ignore the sane methods of international discussion and concession
-which have been evolved largely as a result of these appeals. The
-Interparliamentary Union for International Arbitration and the
-Institute of International Law represent the untiring efforts of the
-advocates of peace through many years. Nevertheless universal peace,
-viewed from the point of the World’s Sovereignty or of the Counsel of
-Nations, is discouraging even when stated by the most ardent promoters
-of the peace society. Here it is quite possible that the mistake is
-being repeated which the old annalists of history made when they
-never failed to chronicle the wars and calamities which harassed
-their contemporaries, although, while the few indulged in fighting,
-the mass of them peacefully prosecuted their daily toil and followed
-their own conceptions of kindliness and equity. An English writer[1]
-has recently bidden us to look at the actual state of affairs existing
-at the present moment. He says, “Universal and permanent peace may be
-a vision; but the gradual change whereby war, as a normal state of
-international relations, has given place to peace as the normal state,
-is no vision, but an actual process of history palpably forwarded in
-our own day by the development of international law and of morals,
-and voluntary arbitration based thereon.” He insists that it is the
-function of international lawyers merely to give coherent expression
-to the best principles which the common moral sense of civilized
-Governments recognizes; in other words, that international law should
-be like primitive law within the nation, a formal expression of custom
-resting on the sense of a reciprocal restraint which has been found to
-be necessary for the common good.
-
-Assuming that the two lines of appeal--the one to sensibility and the
-other to prudence--will persist, and that the international lawyers, in
-spite of the fact that they have no court before which to plead and no
-executive to enforce their findings, will continue to formulate into
-codes the growing moral sense of the nations, the following pages hope
-not only to make clear the contention that these forces within society
-are so dynamic and vigorous that the impulses to war seem by comparison
-cumbersome and mechanical, but also to point out the development of
-those newer social forces which it is believed will at last prove a
-“sovereign intervention” by extinguishing the possibility of battle at
-its very source.
-
-It is difficult to formulate the newer dynamic peace, embodying the
-later humanism, as over against the old dogmatic peace. The word
-“non-resistance” is misleading, because it is much too feeble and
-inadequate. It suggests passivity, the goody-goody attitude of
-ineffectiveness. The words “overcoming,” “substituting,” “re-creating,”
-“readjusting moral values,” “forming new centres of spiritual energy”
-carry much more of the meaning implied. For it is not merely the desire
-for a conscience at rest, for a sense of justice no longer outraged,
-that would pull us into new paths where there would be no more war nor
-preparations for war. There are still more strenuous forces at work
-reaching down to impulses and experiences as primitive and profound
-as are those of struggle itself. That “ancient kindliness which sat
-beside the cradle of the race,” and which is ever ready to assert
-itself against ambition and greed and the desire for achievement, is
-manifesting itself now with unusual force, and for the first time
-presents international aspects.
-
-Moralists agree that it is not so much by the teaching of moral
-theorems that virtue is to be promoted as by the direct expression of
-social sentiments and by the cultivation of practical habits; that in
-the progress of society sentiments and opinions have come first, then
-habits of action and lastly moral codes and institutions. Little is
-gained by creating the latter prematurely, but much may be accomplished
-to the utilization of human interests and affections. The Advocates
-of Peace would find the appeal both to Pity and Prudence totally
-unnecessary, could they utilize the cosmopolitan interest in human
-affairs with the resultant social sympathy that at the present moment
-is developing among all the nations of the earth.
-
-By way of illustration, I may be permitted to cite the London showman
-who used to exhibit two skulls of Shakespeare--one when he was a youth
-and went poaching, another when he was a man and wrote plays. There
-was such a striking difference between the roystering boy indulging in
-illicit sport and the mature man who peopled the London stage with all
-the world, that the showman grew confused and considered two separate
-acts of creation less improbable than that such an amazing change
-should have taken place. We can easily imagine the gifted youth in the
-little group of rustics at Stratford-on-Avon finding no adequate outlet
-for his powers save in a series of break-neck adventures. His only
-alternative was to sit by the fire with the village cronies, drinking
-ale so long as his shillings held out. But if we follow him up to
-London, through all the charm and wonder of the stage which represented
-his unfolding mind, if we can imagine his delight as he gradually
-gained the freedom, not only of that big town, but of the human city
-as well, we can easily see that illicit sport could no longer attract
-him. To have told the great dramatist the night Hamlet first stepped
-upon the boards that it was a wicked thing to poach, to have cautioned
-him that he must consider the cost of preserving the forest and of
-raising the deer, or to have made an appeal to his pity on behalf of
-the wounded creatures, would have been the height of folly, because
-totally unnecessary. All desire, almost all memory of those days, had
-dropped from him, through his absorption in the great and exciting
-drama of life. His effort to understand it, to portray it, had utilized
-and drained his every power. It is equally true of our contemporaries,
-as it was of the great play-wright, that the attainment of this
-all-absorbing passion for multiform life, with the desire to understand
-its mysteries and to free its capacities, is gradually displacing the
-juvenile propensities to warfare.
-
-From this standpoint the advocates of the newer Ideals of Peace would
-have little to do but to insist that the social point of view be kept
-paramount, realizing at the same time that the social sentiments are as
-blind as the egoistic sentiments and must be enlightened, disciplined
-and directed by the fullest knowledge. The modern students of human
-morality have told us that primitive man, by the very necessities of
-his hard struggle for life, came at last to identify his own existence
-with that of his tribe. Tribal life then made room within itself for
-the development of that compassion which is the first step towards
-sensibility and higher moral sentiment. If we accept this statement
-then we must assume that the new social morality, which we so sadly
-need, will of necessity have its origin in the social affections--we
-must search in the dim borderland between compassion and morality for
-the beginnings of that cosmopolitan affection, as it is prematurely
-called.
-
-The life of the tribal man inevitably divided into two sets of actions,
-which appeared under two different ethical aspects: the relation within
-the tribe and the relation with outsiders, the double conception of
-morality maintaining itself until now. But the tribal law differed no
-more widely from inter-tribal law than our common law does from our
-international law. Until society manages to combine the two we shall
-make no headway toward the Newer Ideals of Peace.
-
-If we would institute an intelligent search for the social conditions
-which make possible this combination we should naturally seek for
-them in the poorer quarters of a cosmopolitan city where we have, as
-nowhere else, the conditions for breaking into this double development;
-for making a fresh start, as it were, toward a synthesis upon a higher
-moral line which shall include both. There is every opportunity and
-necessity for compassion and kindliness such as the tribe itself
-afforded, and there is in addition, because of the many nationalities
-which are gathered there from all parts of the world, the opportunity
-and necessity for breaking through the tribal bond. Early associations
-and affections were not based so much on ties of blood as upon that
-necessity for defense against the hostile world outside which made the
-life of every man in a tribe valuable to every other man. The fact
-of blood was, so to speak, an accident. The moral code grew out of
-solidarity of emotion and action essential to the life of all.
-
-In the midst of the modern city which, at moments, seems to stand
-only for the triumph of the strongest, the successful exploitation
-of the weak, the ruthlessness and hidden crime which follow in the
-wake of the struggle for existence on its lowest terms, there come
-daily--at least to American cities--accretions of simple people, who
-carry in their hearts a desire for mere goodness. They regularly
-deplete their scanty livelihood in response to a primitive pity, and,
-independent of the religions they have professed, of the wrongs they
-have suffered, and of the fixed morality they have been taught, have
-an unquenchable desire that charity and simple justice shall regulate
-men’s relations. It seems sometimes, to one who knows them, as if they
-continually sought for an outlet for more kindliness, and that they are
-not only willing and eager to do a favor for a friend, but that their
-kindheartedness lies in ambush, as it were, for a chance to incorporate
-itself in our larger relations, that they persistently expect that
-it shall be given some form of governmental expression. This is
-doubtless due partly to the fact that emotional pity and kindness are
-always found in greatest degree among the unsuccessful. We are told
-that unsuccessful struggle breeds emotion, not strength; that the
-hard-pressed races are the emotional races; and that wherever struggle
-has long prevailed emotion becomes the dominant force in fixing social
-relations. Is it surprising, therefore, that among this huge mass of
-the unsuccessful, to be found in certain quarters of the modern city,
-we should have the “medium,” in which the first growth of the new
-compassion is taking place?
-
-In addition to this compassion always found among the unsuccessful,
-emotional sentiment runs high among the newly arrived immigrants
-as a result of the emotional experiences of parting from home and
-kindred, to which he has been so recently subjected. An unusual mental
-alertness and power of perception also results from the upheaval. The
-multitudes of immigrants flooding the American cities have many times
-sundered social habits cherished through a hundred generations, and
-have renounced customs that may be traced to the habits of primitive
-man. These old habits and customs have a much more powerful hold than
-have mere racial or national ties. In seeking companionship in the new
-world, all the immigrants are reduced to the fundamental equalities and
-universal necessities of human life itself, and they inevitably develop
-the power of association which comes from daily contact with those who
-are unlike each other in all save the universal characteristics of man.
-
-When looked at too closely, this nascent morality disappears, and one
-can count over only a thousand kindly acts and neighborly offices. But
-when meditated upon in the whole, there at once emerge again those vast
-and dominant suggestions of a new peace and holiness. It would seem as
-if our final help and healing were about to issue forth from broken
-human nature itself, out of the pathetic striving of ordinary men, who
-make up the common substance of life: from those who have been driven
-by economic pressure or governmental oppression out of a score of
-nations.
-
-These various peoples who are gathered together in the immigrant
-quarters of a cosmopolitan city worship goodness for its own value,
-and do not associate it with success any more than they associate
-success with themselves; they literally “serve God for nought.”
-If we would adduce evidence that we are emerging from a period of
-industrialism into a period of humanitarianism, it is to such quarters
-that we must betake ourselves. These are the places in which it is
-easiest to study the newer manifestations of government, in which
-personal welfare is considered a legitimate object; for a new history
-of government begins with an attempt to make life possible and human
-in large cities, in those crowded quarters which exhibit such an
-undoubted tendency to barbarism and degeneracy when the better human
-qualities are not nourished. Public baths and gymnasiums, parks and
-libraries, are provided first for those who are without the security
-for bare subsistence, and it does not seem strange to them that it
-should be so. Such a community is made up of men who will continue to
-dream of Utopian Governments until the democratic government about
-them expresses kindliness with protection. Such men will continue to
-rely upon neighborly friendliness until organized charity is able
-to identify impulsive pity with well-considered relief. They will
-naïvely long for an education for their children that will fit them to
-earn money until public education shall come to consider industrial
-efficiency. As their hopes and dreams are a prophecy of the future
-development in city government, in charity, in education, so their
-daily lives are a forecast of coming international relations. Our
-attention has lately been drawn to the fact that it is logical that
-the most vigorous efforts in governmental reform, as well as the most
-generous experiments in ministering to social needs, have come from the
-larger cities and that it is inevitable that they should be to-day “the
-centers of radicalism,” as they have been traditionally the “cradles of
-liberty.”[2]
-
-If we once admit the human dynamic character of progress, then it is
-easy to understand why the crowded city quarters become focal points of
-that progress.
-
-A deeper and more thorough-going unity is required in a community
-made up of highly differentiated peoples than in a more settled and
-stratified one, and it may be logical that we should find in this
-commingling of many peoples a certain balance and concord of opposing
-and contending forces; a gravitation toward the universal. Because of
-their difference in all external matters, in all of the non-essentials
-of life, the people in a cosmopolitan city are forced to found their
-community of interests upon the basic and essential likenesses of their
-common human nature; for, after all, the things that make men alike
-are stronger and more primitive than the things that separate them. It
-is natural that this synthesis of the varying nations should be made
-first at the points of the greatest congestion, quite as we find that
-selfishness is first curbed and social feeling created at the points
-where the conflict of individual interests is sharpest. One dares not
-grow too certain as to the wells of moral healing which lie under the
-surface of the sullen work-driven life which the industrial quarters
-of the modern city present. They fascinate us by their mere size and
-diversity, as does the city itself; but certain it is, that these
-quarters continually confound us by their manifestations of altruism.
-It may be that we are surprised simply because we fail to comprehend
-that the individual, under such pressure, must shape his life with
-some reference to the demands of social justice, not only to avoid
-crushing the little folk about him, but in order to save himself from
-death by crushing. It is an instance of the irresistible coalescing
-of the altruistic and egoistic impulse which is the strength of social
-morality. We are often told that men under this pressure of life become
-calloused and cynical, whereas anyone who lives with them knows that
-they are sentimental and compassionate.
-
-It is possible that we shall be saved from warfare by the “fighting
-rabble” itself, by the “quarrelsome mob” turned into kindly citizens
-of the world through the pressure of a cosmopolitan neighborhood. It
-is not that they are shouting for peace--on the contrary, if they
-shout at all, they will continue to shout for war--but that they are
-really attaining cosmopolitan relations through daily experience.
-They will probably believe for a long time that war is noble and
-necessary both to engender and cherish patriotism; and yet all of the
-time, below their shouting, they are living in the kingdom of human
-kindness. They are laying the simple and inevitable foundations for an
-international order as the foundations of tribal and national morality
-have already been laid. They are developing the only sort of patriotism
-consistent with the intermingling of the nations; for the citizens of a
-cosmopolitan quarter find an insuperable difficulty when they attempt
-to hem in their conception of patriotism either to the “old country”
-or to their adopted one. There arises the hope that when this newer
-patriotism becomes large enough, it will overcome arbitrary boundaries
-and soak up the notion of nationalism. We may then give up war, because
-we shall find it as difficult to make war upon a nation at the other
-side of the globe as upon our next-door neighbor.
-
-These humble harbingers of the Newer Ideals of Peace, venturing
-themselves upon a larger relationship, are most touching; and while
-the success of their efforts can never be guaranteed or spoken of too
-confidently, they stir us with a strange hope, as if new vistas of life
-were opening before us--vistas not illuminated with the glare of war,
-but with a mellowed glow of their own. These paths are seen distinctly
-only as we ascend to a more enveloping point of view and obtain a
-larger and bulkier sense of the growing sentiment which rejects the old
-and negative bonds of discipline and coercion and insists upon vital
-and fraternal relationship, subordinating the lower to the higher.
-To make this hope valid and intelligible, is indeed the task before
-these humble brethren of ours and of those who would help them. They
-encourage us to hope for the discovery of a new vital relation--that
-of the individual to the race--which may lay the foundation for a new
-religious bond adequate to the modern situation; and we almost come
-to believe that such a foundation is, in fact, being laid now--not in
-speculation, but in action.
-
-That which secured for the early Hebrew shepherd his health, his peace
-of mind, and his sense of connection with the Unseen, became the
-basis for the most wonderful and widespread religion the world has
-ever known. Perhaps, at this moment, we need to find that which will
-secure the health, the peace of mind, and the opportunity for normal
-occupation and spiritual growth to the humblest industrial worker, as
-the foundation for a rational conduct of life adapted to an industrial
-and cosmopolitan era.
-
-Even now we only dimly comprehend the strength and irresistible power
-of those “universal and imperious ideals which are formed in the
-depths of anonymous life,” and which the people insist shall come to
-realization, not because they have been tested by logic or history,
-but because the mass of men are eager that they should be tried as
-a living experience. According to our different methods of viewing
-society, we express this newer ideal which is after all so old as to
-have been engendered in the tribe itself. He who makes the study of
-society a mere corollary of biology, speaks of the “theory of the
-unspecialized,” that the simple cell develops much more rapidly when
-new tissue is needed than the more highly developed one; he who views
-society from the economic standpoint and finds hope only in a changed
-industrial order, talks of the “man at the bottom of society,” of the
-proletarian who shall eventually come into his own; he who believes
-that a wiser and a saner education will cure our social ill, speaks
-ever and again of “the wisdom of the little child” and of the necessity
-to reveal and explore his capacity; while he who keeps close to the
-historic deductions upon which the study of society is chiefly founded,
-uses the old religious phrase, “the counsel of imperfection,” and bids
-us concern ourselves with “the least of these.”
-
-The French have a phrase _l’imperieuse bonté_ by which they designate
-those impulses towards compassionate conduct which will not be denied,
-because they are as imperative in their demand for expression as is
-the impulse to make music or to soften life by poesy and decoration.
-According to this definition, St. Francis was a genius in exactly the
-same sense as was Dante or Raphael, and he revealed quite as they did,
-possibilities and reaches of the human soul hitherto unsuspected. This
-genius for goodness has in the past largely expressed itself through
-individuals and groups, but it may be that we are approaching a period
-which shall give it collective expression, and shall unite into one
-all those private and parochial efforts. It would be no more strange
-than was that marvelous coming together of the artists and the people
-in the thirteenth century which resulted in the building of the Gothic
-cathedrals. We may be waiting for a religious enthusiasm, for a divine
-fire to fuse together the partial and feeble efforts at “doing good”
-into a transfigured whole which shall take on international proportions
-as naturally as the cathedrals towered into unheard-of heights.
-The Gothic cathedrals were glorious beyond the dreams of artists,
-notwithstanding that they were built by unknown men, or rather by so
-many men that it was a matter of indifference to record their names.
-Could we compare the present humanitarian efforts to the building of
-a spiritual cathedral, it would seem that the gargoyles had been made
-first, that the ground is now strewn with efforts to “do good” which
-have developed a diabolical capacity for doing harm. But even these
-may fall into place. The old cathedral-builders fearlessly portrayed
-all of life, its inveterate tendency to deride as well as to bless;
-its trickery as well as its beauty. Their art was catholic enough to
-portray all, and the cathedral was huge enough to mellow all they
-portrayed into a flowing and inspired whole.
-
-At the present moment it requires the philosopher to unify these
-spiritual efforts of the common man into the internationalism of good
-will, as in the past it was natural that the philosophers, the men
-who looked at life as a whole, should have been the first to sigh for
-negative peace which they declared would be “eternal.”
-
-Speculative writers, such as Kant, Bentham, and Buckle, long ago
-pointed out that the subsidence of war was inevitable as society
-progressed. They contended that every stage of human progress is marked
-by a further curtailment of brute force, a limitation of the area in
-which it is permitted. At the bottom is the small savage community in
-a perpetual state of warfare; at the top an orderly society stimulated
-and controlled by recognized ideals of social justice. In proportion
-as the savage society comes under the dominion of a common moral
-consciousness, it moves up, and in proportion as the civilized society
-reverts to the use of brute force, it goes down. Reversion to that
-brute struggle may at any moment cost the destruction of the painfully
-acquired bonds of equity, the ties of mutual principle, which are
-wrought with such effort and loosed with such ease. But these earlier
-philosophers could not possibly have foreseen the tremendous growth
-of industry and commerce with their inevitable cosmopolitanism which
-has so recently taken place, nor without knowledge of this could they
-possibly have prognosticated the leap forward and the aggressive
-character which the concern for human welfare has latterly evinced.
-The speculative writers among our contemporaries are naturally the
-only ones who formulate this new development, or rather bid us heed
-its presence among us. An American philosopher[3] has lately reminded
-us of the need to “discover in the social realm the moral equivalent
-for war--something heroic that will speak to men as universally as war
-has done, and yet will be as compatible with their spiritual natures
-as war has proved itself to be incompatible.” It may be true that we
-are even now discovering these moral substitutes, although we find
-it so difficult to formulate them. Perhaps our very hope that these
-substitutes may be discovered has become the custodian of a secret
-change that is going on all about us. We care less each day for the
-heroism connected with warfare and destruction, and constantly admire
-more that which pertains to labor and the nourishing of human life.
-The new heroism manifests itself at the present moment in a universal
-determination to abolish poverty and disease, a manifestation so
-widespread that it may justly be called international.
-
-In illustration of this new determination one immediately thinks of
-the international effort to rid the face of the earth of tuberculosis,
-in which Germany, Italy, France, England and America are engaged with
-such enthusiasm. This movement has its international congresses,
-its discoverers and veterans, also its decorations and rewards for
-bravery. Its discipline is severe; it requires self-control, endurance,
-self-sacrifice and constant watchfulness. Its leaders devote hours to
-careful teaching and demonstration, they reclaim acres of bad houses,
-and make over the food supply of huge cities. One could instance
-the determination to do away with neglected old age, which finds
-expression in the Old Age Pension Acts of Germany and Australia, in the
-State Savings Banks of Belgium and France, in the enormous number of
-Mutual Benefit Societies in England and America. In such undertakings
-as these, with their spontaneous and universal manifestations, are
-we beginning to see the first timid forward reach of one of those
-instinctive movements which carry onward the progressive goodness of
-the race.
-
-It is possible that this substitution of nurture for warfare is
-analogous to that world-wide effort to put a limit to revenge which
-one nation after another essayed as each reached a certain stage of
-development. To compel the avenger to accept blood-money in lieu of
-the blood of his enemy may have been but a short step in morals,
-but at least it destroyed the stimulus to further shedding of blood
-which each avenged death had afforded, and it laid the foundations
-for court adjudications. The newer humanitarianism is more aggressive
-and substitutes emotional stimuli as well as codes of conduct. We may
-predict that each nation quite as a natural process will reach the
-moment when virile good-will will be substituted for the spirit of
-warfare. The process of extinguishing war, however, compared to the
-limiting of revenge, will be amazingly accelerated. Owing to the modern
-conditions of intercourse, each nation will respond, not to an isolated
-impulse, but will be caught in the current of a world-wide process.
-
-We are much too timid and apologetic in regard to this newer
-humanitarianism, and do not yet realize what it may do for us in
-the way of courage and endurance. We continue to defend war on the
-ground that it stirs the nobler blood and the higher imagination of
-the nation, and thus frees it from moral stagnation and the bonds
-of commercialism. We do not see that this is to borrow our virtues
-from a former age and to fail to utilize our own. We find ourselves
-in this plight because our modern morality has lacked fibre, because
-our humanitarianism has been much too soft and literary, and has given
-itself over to unreal and high-sounding phrases. It appears that our
-only hope for a genuine adjustment of our morality and courage to our
-present social and industrial developments, lies in a patient effort
-to work it out by daily experience. We must be willing to surrender
-ourselves to those ideals of the humble, which all religious teachers
-unite in declaring to be the foundations of a sincere moral life.
-
-The following pages attempt to uncover these newer ideals as we may
-daily experience them in the modern city. It may be found that certain
-survivals of militarism in municipal government are responsible for
-much of the failure in the working of democratic institutions. We may
-discover that the survivals of warfare in the labor movement and all
-the other dangers of class morality rest largely upon an appeal to
-loyalties which are essentially a survival of the virtues of a warlike
-period. The more aggressive aspects of the newer humanitarianism may be
-traced in the movement for social amelioration and in the protective
-legislation which regards the weakest citizen as a valuable asset.
-The same spirit which protests against the social waste of child
-labor also demands that the traditional activity of woman shall be
-utilized in civic life. When the State protects its civic resources,
-as it formerly defended its citizens in time of war, industrialism
-versus militarism comes to be nurture versus conquest. In order to
-trace the displacement of the military ideals of patriotism by those
-of a rising concern for human welfare, we must take an accounting
-between those forms of governmental machinery and social organization
-which are the historic outgrowth of conquest and repression and the
-newer forms arising in their midst which embody the social energy
-instantly recognizable as contemporaneous with our sincerest moral
-life. To follow this newer humanitarianism even through its obvious
-manifestations requires at the very outset a definite abandonment of
-the eighteenth-century philosophy upon which so much of our present
-democratic theory and philanthropic activity depends. It is necessary
-from the very beginning to substitute the scientific method of research
-for the a priori method of the school men if we would deal with real
-people and obtain a sense of participation with our fellows. The
-eighteenth-century humanitarian hotly insisted upon “the rights of
-man,” but he loved the people without really knowing them, which is
-by no means an impossible achievement. “The love of those whom a man
-does not know is quite as elemental a sentiment as the love of those
-whom a man does know,” but with this difference, that he shuts himself
-away from the opportunity of being caught and carried forward in the
-stream of their hopes and aspirations, a bigger and warmer current
-than he dreams of. The eighteenth-century humanitarian substituted his
-enthusiastic concept of “the natural man” for the warmth which this
-stream might have given him, and so long as he dealt with political
-concepts it answered his purpose. Mazzini made a most significant
-step between the eighteenth-century morality and our own by appealing
-beyond “the rights of man” to the “duties to humanity;” but although an
-impassioned democrat, he was still a moralist of the earlier type. He
-realized with them that the appeal to humanity would evoke a finer and
-deeper response than that to patriotism or to any sectional morality;
-but he shared the eighteenth-century tendency to idealization. It
-remained for the moralist of this generation to dissolve “humanity”
-into its component parts of men, women, and children and to serve their
-humblest needs with an enthusiasm which, so far from being dependent
-upon glamour, can be sustained only by daily knowledge and constant
-companionship.
-
-It is no easy task to detect and to follow the tiny paths of progress
-which the unencumbered proletarian with nothing but his life and
-capacity for labor, is pointing out for us. These paths lead to a type
-of government founded upon peace and fellowship as contrasted with
-restraint and defence. They can never be discovered with the eyes of
-the doctrinaire. From the nature of the case, he who would walk these
-paths must walk with the poor and oppressed, and can only approach them
-through affection and understanding. The ideals of militarism would
-forever shut him out from this new fellowship.
-
-
-FOOTNOTES:
-
-[1] L. T. Hobhouse, Democracy and Reaction, page 197.
-
-[2] The Growth of Cities in the Nineteenth Century. A. T. Weber, page
-432.
-
-[3] William James, Professor of Philosophy at Harvard University.
-
-
-
-
- CHAPTER II
-
- SURVIVALS OF MILITARISM IN CIVIL GOVERNMENT
-
-
-We are accustomed to say that the machinery of government incorporated
-in the charters of the early American cities, as in the Federal and
-State constitutions, was worked out by men who were strongly under the
-influence of the historians and doctrinaires of the eighteenth century.
-The most significant representative of these men is Thomas Jefferson,
-and their most telling phrase, the familiar opening that “all men are
-created free and equal.”
-
-We are only now beginning to suspect that the present admitted failure
-in municipal administration, the so-called “shame of American cities,”
-may be largely due to the inadequacy of those eighteenth-century
-ideals, with the breakdown of the machinery which they provided. We
-recognize the weakness inherent in the historic and doctrinaire method
-when it attempts to deal with growing and human institutions. While
-these men were strongly under the influence of peace ideals which were
-earnestly advocated, both in France and in America, even in the midst
-of their revolutionary periods, and while they read the burning poets
-and philosophers of their remarkable century, their idealism, after
-all, was largely founded upon theories concerning “the natural man,” a
-creature of their sympathetic imaginations.
-
-Because their idealism was of the type that is afraid of experience,
-these founders refused to look at the difficulties and blunders which
-a self-governing people were sure to encounter, and insisted that,
-if only the people had freedom, they would walk continuously in the
-paths of justice and righteousness. It was inevitable, therefore, that
-they should have remained quite untouched by that worldly wisdom which
-counsels us to know life as it is, and by that very modern belief that
-if the world is ever to go right at all, it must go right in its own
-way.
-
-A man of this generation easily discerns the crudeness of “that
-eighteenth-century conception of essentially unprogressive human
-nature in all the empty dignity of its ‘inborn rights.’”[4] Because
-he has grown familiar with a more passionate human creed, with the
-modern evolutionary conception of the slowly advancing race whose
-rights are not “inalienable,” but hard-won in the tragic processes of
-experience, he realizes that these painfully acquired rights must be
-carefully cherished or they may at any moment slip out of our hands.
-We know better in America than anywhere else that civilization is
-not a broad road, with mile-stones indicating how far each nation
-has proceeded upon it, but a complex struggle forward, each race and
-nation contributing its quota; that the variety and continuity of this
-commingled life afford its charm and value. We would not, if we could,
-conform them to one standard. But this modern attitude, which may
-even now easily subside into negative tolerance, did not exist among
-the founders of the Republic, who, with all their fine talk of the
-“natural man” and what he would accomplish when he obtained freedom and
-equality, did not really trust the people after all.
-
-They timidly took the English law as their prototype, “whose very root
-is in the relation between sovereign and subject, between lawmaker
-and those whom the law restrains,” which has traditionally concerned
-itself more with the guarding of prerogative and with the rights of
-property than with the spontaneous life of the people. They serenely
-incorporated laws and survivals which registered the successful
-struggle of the barons against the aggressions of the sovereign,
-although the new country lacked both nobles and kings. Misled by the
-name of government, they founded their new government by an involuntary
-reference to a lower social state than that which they actually saw
-about them. They depended upon penalties, coercion, compulsion,
-remnants of military codes, to hold the community together; and it
-may be possible to trace much of the maladministration of our cities
-to these survivals, to the fact that our early democracy was a moral
-romanticism, rather than a well-grounded belief in social capacity and
-in the efficiency of the popular will.
-
-It has further happened that as the machinery, groaning under the
-pressure of new social demands put upon it, has broken down that from
-time to time, we have mended it by giving more power to administrative
-officers, because we still distrusted the will of the people. We are
-willing to cut off the dislocated part or to tighten the gearing, but
-are afraid to substitute a machine of newer invention and greater
-capacity. In the hour of danger we revert to the military and legal
-type although they become less and less appropriate to city life in
-proportion as the city grows more complex, more varied in resource and
-more highly organized, and is, therefore, in greater need of a more
-diffused local autonomy.
-
-A little examination will easily show that in spite of the fine phrases
-of the founders, the Government became an entity by itself away from
-the daily life of the people. There was no intention to ignore them
-nor to oppress them. But simply because its machinery was so largely
-copied from the traditional European Governments which did distrust
-the people, the founders failed to provide the vehicle for a vital
-and genuinely organized expression of the popular will. The founders
-carefully defined what was germane to government and what was quite
-outside its realm, whereas the very crux of local self-government, as
-has been well said, is involved in the “right to locally determine the
-scope of the local government,” in response to the needs as they arise.
-
-They were anxious to keep the reins of government in the hands of the
-good and professedly public-spirited, because, having staked so much
-upon the people whom they really knew so little, they became eager
-that they should appear well, and should not be given enough power to
-enable them really to betray their weaknesses. This was done in the
-same spirit in which a kind lady permits herself to give a tramp five
-cents, believing that, although he may spend it for drink, he cannot
-get very drunk upon so small a sum. In spite of a vague desire to
-trust the people, the founders meant to fall back in every crisis upon
-the old restraints which government has traditionally enlisted in its
-behalf, and were, perhaps, inevitably influenced by the experiences of
-the Revolutionary War. Having looked to the sword for independence from
-oppressive governmental control, they came to regard the sword as an
-essential part of the government they had succeeded in establishing.
-
-Regarded from the traditional standpoint, government has always needed
-this force of arms. The king, attempting to control the growing
-power of the barons as they wrested one privilege after another from
-him, was obliged to use it constantly; the barons later successfully
-established themselves in power only to be encroached upon by the
-growing strength and capital of the merchant class. These are now, in
-turn, calling upon the troops and militia for aid, as they are shorn of
-a pittance here and there by the rising power of the proletariat. The
-imperial, the feudal, the capitalistic forms of society each created
-by revolt against oppression from above, preserved their own forms of
-government only by carefully guarding their hardly won charters and
-constitutions. But in the very countries where these successive social
-forms have developed, full of survivals of the past, some beneficent
-and some detrimental, governments are becoming modified more rapidly
-than in this democracy where we ostensibly threw off traditional
-governmental oppression only to encase ourselves in a theory of
-virtuous revolt against oppressive government, which in many instances
-has proved more binding than the actual oppression itself.
-
-Did the founders cling too hard to that which they had won through
-persecution, hardship, and finally through a war of revolution? Did
-these doctrines seem so precious to them that they were determined to
-tie men up to them as long as possible, and allow them no chance to go
-on to new devices of government, lest they slight these that had been
-so hardly won? Did they estimate, not too highly, but by too exclusive
-a valuation, that which they had secured through the shedding of blood?
-
-Man has ever overestimated the spoils of war, and tended to lose his
-sense of proportion in regard to their value. He has ever surrounded
-them with a glamour beyond their deserts. This is quite harmless
-when the booty is an enemy’s sword hung over a household fire, or a
-battered flag decorating a city hall, but when the spoil of war is
-an idea which is bound on the forehead of the victor until it cramps
-his growth, a theory which he cherishes in his bosom until it grows so
-large and near that it afflicts its possessor with a sort of disease of
-responsibility for its preservation, it may easily overshadow the very
-people for whose cause the warrior issued forth.
-
-Was this overestimation of the founders the cause of our subsequent
-failures? or rather did not the fault lie with their successors, and
-does it not now rest with us, that we have wrapped our inheritance
-in a napkin and refused to add thereto? The founders fearlessly took
-the noblest word of their century and incorporated it into a public
-document. They ventured their fortunes and the future of their children
-upon its truth. We, with the belief of a progressive, developing human
-life, apparently accomplish less than they with their insistence upon
-rights and liberties which they so vigorously opposed to mediaeval
-restrictions and obligations. We are in that first period of conversion
-when we hold a creed which forecasts newer and larger possibilities
-for governmental development, without in the least understanding its
-spiritual implications. Although we have scrupulously extended the
-franchise to the varied immigrants among us, we have not yet admitted
-them into real political fellowship.
-
-It is easy to demonstrate that we consider our social and political
-problems almost wholly in the light of one wise group whom we call
-native Americans, legislating for the members of humbler groups whom
-we call immigrants. The first embodies the attitude of contempt or, at
-best, the patronage of the successful towards those who have as yet
-failed to succeed. We may consider the so-called immigration situation
-as an illustration of our failure to treat our growing Republic in the
-spirit of a progressive and developing democracy.
-
-The statement is made many times that we, as a nation, are rapidly
-reaching the limit of our powers of assimilation, that we receive
-further masses of immigrants at the risk of blurring those traits
-and characteristics which we are pleased to call American, with
-its corollary that the national standard of living is in danger
-of permanent debasement. Were we not in the midst of a certain
-intellectual dearth and apathy, of a skepticism in regard to the ideals
-of self-government which have ceased to charm men, we would see that
-we are testing our national life by a tradition too provincial and
-limited to meet its present motley and cosmopolitan character; that we
-lack mental energy, adequate knowledge, and a sense of the youth of
-the earth. The constant cry that American institutions are in danger
-betrays a spiritual waste, not due to our infidelity to national
-ideals, but arising from the fact that we fail to enlarge those ideals
-in accord with our faithful experience of life. Our political machinery
-devised for quite other conditions, has not been readjusted and adapted
-to the successive changes resulting from our development. The clamor
-for the town meeting, for the colonial and early century ideals of
-government is in itself significant, for we are apt to cling to the
-past through a very paucity of ideas.
-
-In a sense the enormous and unprecedented moving about over the face
-of the earth on the part of all nations is in itself the result of
-philosophic dogma of the eighteenth century--of the creed of individual
-liberty. The modern system of industry and commerce presupposes freedom
-of occupation, of travel, and residence; even more, it unhappily rests
-in a large measure upon the assumption of a body of the unemployed and
-the unskilled, ready to be absorbed or dropped according to the demands
-of production: but back of that, or certainly preceding its later
-developments, lies “the natural rights” doctrine of the eighteenth
-century. Even so late as 1892 an official treaty of the United States
-referred to the “inalienable rights of man to change his residence
-and religion.” This dogma of the schoolmen, dramatized in France and
-penetrating under a thousand forms into the most backward European
-States, is still operating as an obscure force in sending emigrants
-to America and in our receiving them here. But in the second century
-of its existence it has become too barren and chilly to induce any
-really zealous or beneficent activity on behalf of the immigrants after
-they arrive. On the other hand those things which we do believe--the
-convictions which might be formulated to the immeasurable benefit of
-the immigrants, and to the everlasting good of our national life,
-have not yet been satisfactorily stated, nor apparently apprehended
-by us, in relation to this field. We have no method by which to
-discover men, to spiritualize, to understand, to hold intercourse with
-aliens and to receive of what they bring. A century-old abstraction
-breaks down before this vigorous test of concrete cases and their
-demand for sympathetic interpretation. When we are confronted by the
-Italian lazzaroni, the peasants from the Carpathian foothills, and the
-proscribed traders from Galatia, we have no national ideality founded
-upon realism and tested by our growing experience with which to meet
-them, but only the platitudes of our crudest youth. The philosophers
-and statesmen of the eighteenth century believed that the universal
-franchise would cure all ills; that liberty and equality rested only
-upon constitutional rights and privileges; that to obtain these two
-and to throw off all governmental oppression constituted the full
-duty of the progressive patriot. We still keep to this formalization
-because the philosophers of this generation give us nothing newer. We
-ignore the fact that world-wide problems can no longer be solved by
-a political constitution assuring us against opposition, but that we
-must frankly face the proposition that the whole situation is more
-industrial than political. Did we apprehend this, we might then realize
-that the officers of the Government who are dealing with naturalization
-papers and testing the knowledge of the immigrants concerning the
-Constitution of the United States, are only playing with counters
-representing the beliefs of a century ago, while the real issues are
-being settled by the great industrial and commercial interests which
-are at once the products and the masters of our contemporary life.
-As children who are allowed to amuse themselves with poker chips
-pay no attention to the real game which their elders play with the
-genuine cards in their hands, so we shut our eyes to the exploitation
-and industrial debasement of the immigrant, and say, with placid
-contentment, that he has been given the rights of an American citizen,
-and that, therefore, all our obligations have been fulfilled. It is as
-if we should undertake to cure the contemporary political corruption
-founded upon a disregard of the Inter-State Commerce Acts, by requiring
-the recreant citizens to repeat the Constitution of the United States.
-
-As yet no vigorous effort is made to discover how far our present
-system of naturalization, largely resting upon laws enacted in 1802, is
-inadequate, although it may have met the requirements of “the fathers.”
-These processes were devised to test new citizens who had immigrated to
-the United States from political rather than from economic pressure,
-although these two have always been in a certain sense coextensive.
-Yet the early Irish came to America to seek an opportunity for
-self-government, denied them at home; the Germans and Italians started
-to come in largest numbers after the absorption of their smaller
-States into the larger nations; and the immigrants from Russia are the
-conquered Poles, Lithuanians, Finns, and Jews. On some such obscure
-notion the processes of naturalization were worked out, and, with a
-certain degree of logic, the first immigrants were presented with the
-Constitution of the United States as a type and epitome of that which
-they had come to seek. So far as they now come in search of political
-liberty, as many of them do every day, the test is still valid, but,
-in the meantime, we cannot ignore those significant figures which show
-emigration to rise with periods of depression in given countries, and
-immigration to be checked by periods of depression in America, and we
-refuse to see how largely the question has become an economic one.
-
-At the present moment, as we know, the actual importing of immigrants
-is left largely to the energy of steamship companies and to those
-agents for contract labor who are keen enough to avoid the restrictive
-laws. The business man is here again in the saddle, as he so largely
-is in American affairs. From the time that the immigrants first make
-the acquaintance of the steamship agent in their own villages, at
-least until a grandchild is born on the new soil, they are subjected
-to various processes of exploitation from purely commercial and
-self-seeking interests. It begins with the representatives of the
-transatlantic lines and their allies, who convert the peasant holdings
-into money, and provide the prospective emigrants with needless
-supplies, such as cartridge belts and bowie knives. The brokers, in
-manufactured passports, send their clients by successive stages for
-a thousand miles to a port suiting their purposes. On the way the
-emigrants’ eyes are treated that they may pass the physical test; they
-are taught to read sufficiently well to meet the literacy test; they
-are lent enough money to escape the pauper test, and by the time they
-have reached America, they are so hopelessly in debt that it requires
-months of work to repay all they have received. During this time they
-are completely under the control of the last broker in the line, who
-has his dingy office in an American city. The exploitation continues
-under the employment agency whose operations verge into those of the
-politician, through the naturalization henchman, the petty lawyers who
-foment their quarrels and grievances by the statement that in a free
-country everybody “goes to law,” by the liquor dealers who stimulate a
-lively trade among them, and, finally, by the lodging-house keepers and
-the landlords who are not obliged to give them the housing which the
-American tenant demands. It is a long dreary road, and the immigrant
-is successfully exploited at each turn. At moments one looking on is
-driven to quote the Titanic plaint of Walt Whitman:
-
-“As I stand aloof and look, there is to me something profoundly
-affecting in large masses of men following the lead of those who do
-not believe in men.”
-
-The sinister aspect of this exploitation lies in the fact that it is
-carried on by agents whose stock in trade are the counters and terms
-of citizenship. It is said that at the present moment there are more
-of these agents in Palermo than perhaps in any other European port,
-and that those politicians who have found it impossible to stay even
-in that corrupt city are engaged in the brokerage of naturalization
-papers in the United States. Certainly one effect of the stringent
-contract labor laws has been to make the padrones more powerful
-because “smuggled alien labor” has become more valuable to American
-corporations, and also to make simpler the delivery of immigrant
-votes according to the dictates of commercial interests. It becomes a
-veritable system of poisoning the notions of decent government; but
-because the entire process is carried on in political terms, because
-the poker chips are colored red, white, and blue, we are childishly
-indifferent to it. An elaborate avoidance of restrictions quickly
-adapts itself to changes either in legislation here or at the points
-of departure, because none of the legislation is founded upon a real
-analysis of the situation. For instance, a new type of broker in Russia
-during the Russian-Japanese War made use of the situation in the
-interests of young Russian Jews. If one of these men leaves the country
-ordinarily, his family is obliged to pay three hundred rubles to the
-Government, but if he first joins the army, his family is free from
-this obligation for he has passed into the keeping of his sergeant. Out
-of four hundred Russian Jews who, during three months, were drafted
-into the army at a given recruiting station, only ten reported,
-the rest having escaped through immigration. Of course the entire
-undertaking is much more hazardous, because the man is a deserter from
-the army in addition to his other disabilities; but the brokers merely
-put up the price of their services and continue their undertakings.
-
-All these evasions of immigration laws and regulations are simply
-possible because the governmental tests do not belong to the current
-situation, and because our political ideas are inherited from
-governmental conditions not our own. In our refusal to face the
-situation, we have persistently ignored the political ideals of the
-Celtic, Germanic, Latin, and Slavic immigrants who have successively
-come to us; and in our overwhelming ambition to remain Anglo-Saxon, we
-have fallen into the Anglo-Saxon temptation of governing all peoples
-by one standard. We have failed to work out a democratic government
-which should include the experiences and hopes of all the varied
-peoples among us. We justify the situation by some such process as that
-employed by each English elector who casts a vote for seventy-five
-subjects besides himself. He indirectly determines--although he may be
-a narrow-minded tradesman or a country squire interested only in his
-hounds and horses--the colonial policy, which shall in turn control
-the destinies of the Egyptian child toiling in the cotton factory in
-Alexandria, and of the half-starved Parsee working the opium fields of
-North India. Yet he cannot, in the nature of the case, be informed of
-the needs of these far-away people and he would venture to attempt it
-only in regard to people whom he considered “inferior.”
-
-Pending a recent election, a Chicago reformer begged his hearers to
-throw away all selfish thoughts of themselves when they went to the
-polls and to vote in behalf of the poor and ignorant foreigners of the
-city. It would be difficult to suggest anything which would result
-in a more serious confusion than to have each man, without personal
-knowledge and experiences, consider the interests of the newly arrived
-immigrant. The voter would have to give himself over to a veritable
-debauch of altruism in order to persuade himself that his vote would be
-of the least value to those men of whom he knew so little, and whom
-he considered so remote and alien to himself. In truth the attitude of
-the advising reformer was in reality so contemptuous that he had never
-considered the immigrants really partakers and molders of the political
-life of his country.
-
-This attitude of contempt, of provincialism, this survival of
-the spirit of the conqueror toward an inferior people, has many
-manifestations, but none so harmful as when it becomes absorbed and
-imitated and is finally evinced by the children of the foreigners
-toward their own parents.
-
-We are constantly told of the increase of criminals in the second
-generation of immigrants, and, day after day, one sees lads of twelve
-and fourteen throwing off the restraint of family life and striking
-out for themselves. The break has come thus early, partly from the
-forced development of the child under city conditions, partly because
-the parents have had no chance of following, even remotely, this
-development, but largely because the Americanized child has copied the
-contemptuous attitude towards the foreigner which he sees all about
-him. The revolt has in it something of the city impatience of country
-standards, but much more of America against Poland or Italy. It is all
-wretchedly sordid with bitterness on the part of the parents, and
-hardhearted indifference and recklessness on the part of the boy. Only
-occasionally can the latter be appealed to by filial affection after
-the first break has once been thoroughly made; and yet, sometimes,
-even these lads see the pathos of the situation. A probation officer
-from Hull-House one day surprised three truants who were sitting by
-a bonfire which they had built near the river. Sheltered by an empty
-freight car, the officer was able to listen to their conversation. The
-Pole, the Italian, and the Bohemian boys who had broken the law by
-staying away from school, by building a fire in dangerous proximity to
-freight cars, and by “swiping” the potatoes which they were roasting,
-seemed to have settled down into an almost halcyon moment of gentleness
-and reminiscence. The Italian boy commiserated his parents because they
-hated the cold and the snow and “couldn’t seem to get used to it;” the
-Pole said that his father missed seeing folks that he knew and was
-“sore on this country;” the Bohemian lad really grew quite tender about
-his old grandmother and the “stacks of relations” who came to see her
-every Sunday in the old country, where, in contrast to her loneliness
-here, she evidently had been a person of consequence. All of them felt
-the pathos of the situation, but the predominant note was the cheap
-contempt of the new American for foreigners, even though they are of
-his own blood. The weakening of the tie which connects one generation
-with another may be called the domestic results of the contemptuous
-attitude. But the social results of the contemptuous attitude are even
-more serious and nowhere so grave as in the modern city.
-
-Men are there brought together by multitudes in response to the
-concentration of industry and commerce without bringing with them
-the natural social and family ties or the guild relationships which
-distinguished the mediaeval cities and held even so late as the
-eighteenth century, when the country people came to town in response
-to the normal and slowly formed ties of domestic service, family
-affection, and apprenticeship. Men who come to a modern city by
-immigration break all these older ties and the national bond in
-addition. There is all the more necessity to develop that cosmopolitan
-bond which forms their substitute. The immigrants will be ready to
-adapt themselves to a new and vigorous civic life founded upon the
-recognition of their needs if the Government which is at present
-administered in our cities, will only admit that these needs are
-germane to its functions. The framers of the carefully prepared
-charters, upon which the cities are founded, did not foresee that
-after the universal franchise had once been granted, social needs
-and ideals were bound to enter in as legitimate objects of political
-action. Neither did these framers realize, on the other hand, that the
-only people in a democracy who can legitimately become the objects
-of repressive government, are those people who are too undeveloped
-to use their liberty or those who have forfeited their right to full
-citizenship. We have, therefore, a municipal administration in America
-which concerns itself only grudgingly with the social needs of the
-people, and is largely reduced to the administration of restrictive
-measures. The people who come most directly in contact with the
-executive officials, who are the legitimate objects of their control,
-are the vicious, who need to be repressed; and the semi-dependent
-poor, who appeal to them in their dire need; or, for quite the reverse
-reason, those who are trying to avoid an undue taxation, resenting the
-fact that they should be made to support a government which, from the
-nature of the case, is too barren to excite their real enthusiasm.
-
-The instinctive protest against this mechanical method of civic
-control, with the lack of adjustment between the natural democratic
-impulse and the fixed external condition, inevitably produces the
-indifferent citizen, and the so-called “professional politician.” The
-first, because he is not vicious, feels that the real processes of
-government do not concern him and wishes only to be let alone. The
-latter easily adapts himself to an illegal avoidance of the external
-fixed conditions by assuming that these conditions have been settled
-by doctrinaires who did not in the least understand the people,
-while he, the politician, makes his appeal beyond the conditions to
-the real desires of the people themselves. He is thus not only “the
-people’s friend,” but their interpreter. It is interesting to note
-how often simple people refer to “them,” meaning the good and great
-who govern but do not understand, and to “him,” meaning the alderman,
-who represents them in these incomprehensible halls of State, as an
-ambassador to a foreign country to whose borders they themselves could
-not possibly penetrate, and whose language they do not speak.
-
-In addition to this difficulty inherent in the difference between the
-traditional and actual situation, there is another, which constantly
-arises on the purely administrative side. The traditional governments
-which the founders had copied, in proceeding by fixed standards to
-separate the vicious from the good, and then to legislate against the
-vicious, had enforced these restrictive measures by trained officials,
-usually with a military background. In a democracy, however,
-the officers entrusted with the enforcement of this restrictive
-legislation, if not actually elected by the people themselves, are
-still the appointments of those thus elected and are, therefore,
-good-natured men who have made friends by their kindness and social
-qualities. This is only decreasingly true even in those cities where
-appointments are made by civil service examinations. The carrying out
-of repressive legislation, the remnant of a military state of society,
-in a democracy is at last put into the hands of men who have attained
-office because of political pull. The repressive measures must be
-enforced by those sympathizing with the people and belonging to those
-against whom the measures operate. This anomalous situation produces
-almost inevitably one result: that the police authorities themselves
-are turned into allies of vice and crime. This may be illustrated
-from almost any of the large American cities in the relation existing
-between the police force and the gambling and other illicit life. The
-officers are often flatly told that the enforcement of an ordinance
-which the better element of the city has insisted upon passing, is
-impossible; that they are expected to control only the robbery and
-crime that so often associate themselves with vice. As Mr. Wilcox[5]
-has recently pointed out, public sentiment itself assumes a certain
-hypocrisy, and in the end we have “the abnormal conditions which are
-created when vice is protected by the authorities,” and in the very
-worst cases there develops a sort of municipal blackmail in which
-the administration itself profits by the violation of law. The very
-governmental agencies which were designed to protect the citizen
-from vice, foster and protect him in its pursuance because everybody
-involved is thoroughly confused by the human element in the situation.
-Further than this, the officer’s very kindness and human understanding
-is that which leads to his downfall, for he is forced to uphold the
-remnant of a military discipline in a self-governing community. It is
-not remarkable, perhaps, that the police department, the most vigorous
-survival of militarism to be found in American cities, has always
-been responsible for the most exaggerated types of civic corruption.
-It is sad, however, that this corruption has largely been due to the
-kindliness of the officers and to their lack of military training.
-There is no doubt that the reasonableness of keeping the saloons in
-lower New York open on Sunday was apparent to the policemen of the East
-Side force long before it dawned upon the reform administration; and
-yet, that the policemen allowed themselves to connive at law-breaking,
-was the beginning of their disgraceful downfall. Because kindness to an
-enemy may mean death or the annihilation of the army which he guards,
-all kindness is illicit on the part of the military sentinel on duty;
-but to bring that code over bodily into a peaceful social state is to
-break down the morals of both sides, of the enforcer of the ill-adapted
-law, as well as of those against whom it is so maladroitly directed.
-
-In order to meet this situation, there is almost inevitably developed
-a politician of the corrupt type so familiar in American cities, the
-politician who has become successful because he has made friends
-with the vicious. The semi-criminal, who are constantly brought in
-contact with administrative government are naturally much interested
-in its operations. Having much at stake, as a matter of course, they
-attend the primaries and all the other election processes which so
-quickly tire the good citizens whose interest in the government is a
-self-imposed duty. To illustrate: it is a matter of much moment to a
-gambler whether there is to be a “wide-open town” or not; it means the
-success or failure of his business; it involves, not only the pleasure,
-but the livelihood, of all his friends. He naturally attends to the
-election of the alderman, to the appointment and retention of the
-policeman. He is found at the caucus “every time,” and would be much
-amused if he were praised for the performance of his civic duty; but,
-because he and the others who are concerned in semi-illicit business do
-attend the primaries, the corrupt politician is nominated over and over
-again.
-
-As this type of politician is successful from his alliance with crime,
-there also inevitably arises from time to time a so-called reformer
-who is shocked to discover the state of affairs, the easy partnership
-between vice and administrative government. He dramatically uncovers
-the situation and arouses great indignation against it on the part of
-good citizens. If this indignation is enough, he creates a political
-fervor which is translated into a claim upon public gratitude. In
-portraying the evil he is fighting, he does not recognize, or at least
-does not make clear, all the human kindness upon which it has grown.
-In his speeches he inevitably offends a popular audience, who know
-that the evil of corruption exists in all degrees and forms of human
-weakness, but who also know that these evils are by no means always
-hideous, and sometimes even are lovable. They resent his over-drawn
-pictures of vice and of the life of the vicious; their sense of
-fair play, their deep-rooted desire for charity and justice, are all
-outraged.
-
-To illustrate from a personal experience: Some years ago a famous New
-York reformer came to Chicago to tell us of his phenomenal success,
-his trenchant methods of dealing with the city “gambling-hells,” as
-he chose to call them. He proceeded to describe the criminals of
-lower New York in terms and phrases which struck at least one of his
-auditors as sheer blasphemy against our common human nature. I thought
-of the criminals whom I knew, of the gambler for whom each Saturday
-I regularly collected his weekly wage of $24.00, keeping $18.00 for
-his wife and children and giving him $6.00 on Monday morning. His
-despairing statement, “the thing is growing on me, and I can never give
-it up,” was certainly not the cry of a man living in hell, but of him
-who, through much tribulation had at least kept the loyal intention.
-I remembered the three girls who had come to me with a paltry sum of
-money collected from the pawn and sale of their tawdry finery in order
-that one of their number might be spared a death in the almshouse and
-that she might have the wretched comfort during the closing weeks of
-her life of knowing that, although she was an outcast, she was not a
-pauper. I recalled the first murderer whom I had ever known, a young
-man who was singing his baby to sleep and stopped to lay it in its
-cradle before he rushed downstairs into his father’s saloon to scatter
-the gang of boys who were teasing the old man by giving him English
-orders. The old man could not understand English and the boys were
-refusing to pay for the drinks they had consumed, but technically had
-not ordered.
-
-For one short moment I saw the situation from the point of view of
-humbler people, who sin often through weakness and passion, but seldom
-through hardness of heart, and I felt that in a democratic community
-such sweeping condemnations and conclusions as the speaker was pouring
-forth could never be accounted for righteousness.
-
-As the policeman who makes terms with vice, and almost inevitably
-slides into making gain from vice, merely represents the type of
-politician who is living off the weakness of his fellows, so the
-over-zealous reformer who exaggerates vice until the public is scared
-and awestruck, represents the type of politician who is living off the
-timidity of his fellows. With the lack of civic machinery for simple
-democratic expression, for a direct dealing with human nature as it is,
-we seem doomed to one type or the other--corruptionists or anti-crime
-committees.
-
-And one sort or the other we will continue to have so long as we
-distrust the very energy of existence, the craving for enjoyment,
-the pushing of vital forces, the very right of every citizen to be
-what he is without pretense or assumption of virtue. Too often he
-does not really admire these virtues, but he imagines them somewhere
-as a standard adopted by the virtuous whom he does not know. That
-old Frankenstein, the ideal man of the eighteenth century, is still
-haunting us, although he never existed save in the brain of the
-doctrinaire.
-
-This dramatic and feverish triumph of the self-seeker, see-sawing
-with that of the interested reformer, does more than anything else,
-perhaps, to keep the American citizen away from the ideals of genuine
-evolutionary democracy. Whereas repressive government, from the
-nature of the case, has to do with the wicked who are happily always
-in a minority in the community, a normal democratic government would
-naturally have to do with the great majority of the population in their
-normal relations to each other.
-
-After all, the so-called “slum politician” ventures his success upon an
-appeal to human sentiment and generosity. This venture often results in
-an alliance between the popular politician and the humblest citizens,
-quite as naturally as the reformer who stands for honest business
-administration usually becomes allied with the type of business man
-whose chief concern it is to guard his treasure and to prevent a rise
-in taxation. The community is again insensibly divided into two camps,
-the repressed, who is dimly conscious that he has no adequate outlet
-for his normal life and the repressive, represented by the cautious,
-careful citizen holding fast to his own,--once more the conqueror and
-his humble people.
-
-
-FOOTNOTES:
-
-[4] “The Spirit of Modern Philosophy,” Josiah Royce, page 275.
-
-[5] The American City, Dr. Delos F. Wilcox, page 200.
-
-
-
-
- CHAPTER III
-
- FAILURE TO UTILIZE IMMIGRANTS IN CITY GOVERNMENT
-
-
-We do much loose talking in regard to American immigration; we use
-the phrase, “the scum of Europe,” and other unwarranted words without
-realizing that the unsuccessful man, the undeveloped peasant, may be
-much more valuable to us here than the more highly developed, but
-also more highly specialized, town dweller, who may much less readily
-acquire the characteristics which the new environment demands.
-
-If successful struggle ends in the survival of the few, in blatant and
-tangible success for the few only, government will have to reckon most
-largely with the men who have been beaten in the struggle, with the
-effect upon them of the contest and the defeat; for, after all, the
-unsuccessful will always represent the majority of the citizens, and it
-is with the large majority that self-government must eventually deal
-whatever course of action other governments may legitimately determine
-for themselves.
-
-To demand to be protected from the many unsuccessful among us, who are
-supposed to issue forth from the shallows of our city life and seize
-upon the treasure of the citizens as the barbarians of old came from
-outside the city walls, is of course not to have read the first lesson
-of self-government in the light of evolutionary science. It is to
-forget that a revival in self-government, an awakening of its original
-motive power and _raison d’être_, can come only from a genuine desire
-to increase its scope, and to adapt it to new and strenuous conditions.
-In this way science revived and leaped forward under the pressure of
-the enlarged demand of manufacture and commerce put upon it during the
-industrial decades just passed.
-
-We would ask the moralists and statesmen of this dawning century,
-equipped as they are, with the historic method, to save our
-contemporaries from skepticism in regard to self-government by
-revealing to them its adaptability to the needs of the humblest man
-who is so sorely pressed in this industrial age. The statesman who
-would fill his countrymen with enthusiasm for democratic government
-must not only possess a genuine understanding of the needs of the
-simplest citizens, but he must know how to reveal their capacities
-and powers. He must needs go man-hunting into those curious groups
-we call newly arrived immigrants, and do for them what the scholar
-has done in pointing out to us the sweetness and charm which inhere
-in primitive domestic customs and in showing us the curious pivot
-these customs make for religious and tribal beliefs. The scholar who
-has surrounded the simplest action of women grinding millet or corn
-with a penetrating reminiscence, sweeter than the chant they sing,
-may reveal something of the same reminiscence and charm among many
-of the immigrants. In the midst of crowded city streets one stumbles
-upon an old Italian peasant with her distaff against her withered face
-and her pathetic hands patiently “holding the thread,” as has been
-done by myriads of women since children needed to be clad; or one
-sees an old German potter, misshapen by years, his sensitive hands
-nevertheless fairly alive with skill and delicacy, and his life at
-least illumined with the artist’s prerogative of direct creation.
-Could we take these primitive habits as they are to be found every day
-in American cities and give them their significance and place, they
-would be a wonderful factor for poetry in cities frankly given over
-to industrialism and absorbed in its activities. As a McAndrews’ hymn
-expresses the frantic rush of the industrial river, so these primitive
-customs could give us something of the mysticism and charm of the
-industrial springs, a suggestion of source, a touch of the refinement
-which adheres to simple things. This study of origins, of survivals,
-of paths of least resistance--refining an industrial age through the
-people and experiences which really belong to it and do not need to
-be brought in from the outside--would surely result in a revived
-enthusiasm for human life and its possibilities which would in turn
-react upon the ideals of government. The present lack of understanding
-of simple people and the dearth of the illumination which knowledge of
-them would give, can be traced not only in the social and political
-maladjustment of the immigrant in municipal centres, but is felt in
-so-called “practical affairs” of national magnitude. Regret is many
-times expressed that, notwithstanding the fact that nine out of every
-ten immigrants are of rural birth and are fitted to undertake that
-painstaking method of cultivating the soil which American farmers
-despise, they nevertheless all tend to congregate in cities where
-their inherited and elaborate knowledge of agricultural processes is
-unutilized. But it is characteristic of American complacency when any
-assisted removal to agricultural regions is contemplated, that we
-utterly ignore the past experiences of the immigrant and always assume
-that each family will be content to live in the middle of its own piece
-of ground, although there are few peoples on the face of the earth who
-have ever tried isolating a family on one hundred and sixty acres or on
-eighty, or even on forty. But this is the American way--a survival of
-our pioneer days--and we refuse to modify it, even in regard to South
-Italians, although from the day of mediaeval incursions they have lived
-in compact villages with an intense and elaborated social life, so
-much of it out of doors and interdependent that it has affected almost
-every domestic habit. Italian women knead their own bread, but depend
-on the village oven for its baking, and the men would rather walk for
-miles to their fields each day than to face an evening of companionship
-limited to the family. Nothing could afford a better check to the
-constant removal to the cities of the farming population all over the
-United States than the possibility of combining community life with
-agricultural occupation. This combination would afford that development
-of civilization which, curiously enough, density alone brings and
-for which even a free system of rural delivery is not an adequate
-substitute. Much of the significance and charm of rural life in South
-Italy lies in its village companionship, quite as the dreariness of the
-American farm life inheres in its unnecessary solitude. But we totally
-disregard the solution which the old agricultural community offers,
-and our utter lack of adaptability has something to do with the fact
-that the South Italian remains in the city where he soon forgets his
-cunning in regard to silk worms and olive trees, but continues his old
-social habits to the extent of filling an entire tenement house with
-the people from one village.
-
-We also exhibit all the Anglo-Saxon distrust of any experiment with
-land tenure or method of taxation, although our single-tax advocates do
-not fail to tell us daily of the stupidity of the present arrangement.
-It might, indeed, be well to make a few experiments upon an historic
-basis before their enthusiasm converts us all. For centuries in
-Russia the Slavic village, the mir system of land occupation, has
-been in successful operation, training men within its narrow limits
-to community administration. Yet when a persecuted sect from Russia
-wishes to find refuge in America, we insist that seven thousand
-people shall give up all at once a system of land ownership in which
-they are experts. Americans declare the system to be impracticable,
-although it is singularly like that in vogue in Palestine during the
-period of its highest prosperity. We cannot receive them in the United
-States, because our laws have no way of dealing with such cases.
-And in Canada, where they are finally settled, the unimaginative
-Dominion officials are driven to the verge of distraction concerning
-registration of deeds and the collection of taxes from men who do not
-claim acres in their own names, but in the name of the village. The
-official distraction is reflected and intensified among the people
-themselves, to the point of driving them into the mediaeval “marching
-mania,” in the hope of finding a land in the south where they may carry
-out their inoffensive “mir” system. The entire situation might prove
-that an unbending theory of individualism may become as fixed as status
-itself, although there are certainly other factors in the Doukhobor
-situation--religious bigotry, and the self-seeking of leadership.
-In spite of the fact that the Canadian officials have in other
-matters exhibited much of the adaptability which distinguishes the
-British colonial policy, they are completely stranded on the rock of
-Anglo-Saxon individualistic ownership, and assume that any other system
-of land tenure is subversive of government, forgetting that Russia
-manages to exert a fair amount of governmental control over thousands
-of acres held under the system which they so detest.
-
-In our eagerness to reproach the immigrants for not going upon the
-land we almost overlook the contributions to city life which those
-of them, who were adapted to it in Europe, are making to our cities
-here. From dingy little eating-houses in lower New York, performing a
-function somewhat between the eighteenth-century coffee-house and the
-Parisian café, is issuing at the present moment perhaps the sturdiest
-realistic drama that is being produced on American soil. Late into the
-night speculation is carried forward--not on the nice questions of
-the Talmud and on quibbles of logic; but minds long trained on these
-seriously discuss the need of a readjustment of the industrial machine
-in order that the primitive sense of justice and righteousness may
-secure larger play in our social organization. And yet a Russian in
-Chicago who used to believe that Americans cared first and foremost
-for political liberty and that they would certainly admire those who
-had suffered in its cause, finds no one interested in his story of six
-years’ banishment beyond the Antarctic circle. He is really listened to
-only when he tells the tale to a sportsman of the fish he had caught
-during the six weeks of summer when the rivers were open. “Lively work
-then, but plenty of time to eat them dried or frozen through the rest
-of the year,” is the most sympathetic comment he has yet received upon
-an experience which, at least to him, held the bittersweet of martyrdom.
-
-Among the colonies of the most recently immigrated Jews, who still
-carry out their orthodox customs and a ritual preserved through
-centuries in the Ghetto, one constantly feels during a season of
-religious observance, a refreshing insistence upon the reality of the
-inner life, and upon the dignity of its expression in inherited form.
-Perhaps the most striking reproach to the materialism of Chicago is the
-sight on a solemn Jewish holiday of a Chicago River bridge lined with
-men and women oblivious of the noisy traffic and sordid surroundings,
-casting their sins upon the waters that they may be carried far away.
-The scene is a clear statement that, after all, life does not consist
-in wealth, in learning, in enterprise, in energy, in success, not even
-in that modern fetich, culture, but in an inner equilibrium, in “the
-agreement of soul.” It is a relief to see even this exaggerated and
-grotesque presentation of spiritual values.
-
-But the statesman shuts himself away from the possibility of using
-these great reservoirs of human ability and motive power because he
-considers it patriotic to hold to governmental lines and ideals laid
-down a century and a quarter ago. Because of a military inheritance,
-we as a nation stoutly contend that all this varied and suggestive
-life has nothing to do with government nor patriotism, and that we
-perform the full duty of American citizens when the provisions of the
-statutes on naturalization are carried out. In the meantime, in the
-interests of our theory that commercial and governmental powers should
-have no connection with each other, we carefully ignore the one million
-false naturalization papers in the United States issued and concealed
-by commercialized politics. Although we have an uneasy knowledge that
-these powers are curiously allied, we profess that the latter has no
-connection with the former and no control over it. We steadily refuse
-to recognize the fact that our age is swayed by industrial forces.
-
-Fortunately, life is much bigger and finer than our theories about
-it, and, among all the immigrants in the great cities, there is
-slowly developing the beginnings of self-government on the lines of
-their daily experiences. The man who really knows immigrants and
-undertakes to naturalize them, makes no pretense of the lack of
-connection between their desire to earn their daily bread and their
-citizenship. The petty and often corrupt politician who is first kind
-to immigrants, realizes perfectly well that the force pushing them to
-this country has been industrial need and that recognition of this
-need is legitimate. He follows the natural course of events when he
-promises to get the immigrant “a job,” for that is undoubtedly what
-the immigrant most needs in all the world. If the politician nearest
-to him were really interested in the immigrant and were to work out
-a scheme of naturalization fitted to the situation, the immigrant
-would proceed from the street-cleaning and sewer-digging in which he
-first engages, to an understanding of the relation of these simple
-offices to city government. Through them he would understand the
-obligation of his alderman to secure cleanliness for the streets
-in which his children play and for the tenement in which he lives.
-The notion of representative government could be made quite clear
-and concrete to him. He could demand his rights and use his vote in
-order to secure them. His very naïve demands might easily become a
-restraint, a purifying check upon the alderman, instead of a source of
-constant corruption and exploitation. But when the politician attempts
-to naturalize the bewildered immigrant, he must perforce accept
-the doctrinaire standard imposed by men who held a theory totally
-unattached to experience, and he must, therefore, begin with the remote
-Constitution of the United States. At the Cook County Court-House only
-a short time ago a candidate for naturalization, who was asked the
-usual question as to what the Constitution of the United States was,
-replied: “The Illinois Central.” His mind naturally turned to his
-work, to the one bit of contribution he had genuinely made to the new
-country, and his reply might well offer a valuable suggestion to the
-student of educational method. Some of our most advanced schools are
-even now making industrial construction and evolution a natural basis
-for all future acquisition of knowledge, and they claim that anything
-less vital and creative is inadequate.
-
-It is surprising how a simple experience, if it be but genuine, gives
-an opening into citizenship altogether lacking to the more grandiose
-attempts. A Greek-American, slaughtering sheep in a tenement-house
-yard, reminiscent of the Homeric tradition, can be made to see the
-effect of the improvised shambles on his neighbor’s health and the
-right of the city to prohibit the slaughtering, only as he perceives
-the development of city government upon its most modern basis.
-
-The enforcement of adequate child labor laws offers unending
-opportunity to better citizenship founded, not upon theory but on
-action, as does the compulsory education law, which makes clear that
-education is a matter of vital importance to the American city and to
-the State which has enacted definite, well-considered legislation in
-regard to it. Some of the most enthusiastic supporters of child-labor
-legislation and of compulsory education laws are those parents who
-sacrifice old-world tradition, as well as the much-needed earnings of
-their young children, because of loyalty to the laws of their adopted
-country. Certainly genuine sacrifice for the nation’s law is a good
-foundation for patriotism, and as this again is not a doctrinaire
-question, women are not debarred, and mothers who wash and scrub for
-the meagre support of their children say, sturdily, sometimes: “It will
-be a year before he can go to work without breaking the law, but we
-came to this country to give the young ones a chance, and we are not
-going to begin by having them do what’s not right.”
-
-Upon some such basis as this the Hebrew Alliance and the Charity
-Organization of New York, which are putting forth desperate energy in
-the enormous task of ministering to the suffering which immigration
-entails, are developing understanding and respect for the alien through
-their mutual efforts to secure more adequate tenement-house regulation
-and to control the spread of tuberculosis; both these undertakings
-being perfectly hopeless without the intelligent co-operation of
-the immigrants themselves. Through such humble doors, perchance,
-the immigrant will at last enter into his heritage in a new nation.
-Democratic government has ever been the result of spiritual travail
-and moral effort. Apparently, even here, the immigrant must pay the
-old cost, and he seems to represent the group and type which is making
-the most genuine contribution to the present growth in governmental
-functions, with its constant demand for increasing adaptations.
-
-In the induction of the adult immigrant into practical citizenship,
-we constantly ignore his daily experience. We also assume in our
-formal attempts to teach patriotism to him and to his children, that
-experience and traditions have no value, and that a new sentiment
-must be put into aliens by some external process. Some years ago, a
-public-spirited organization engaged a number of speakers to go to
-the various city schools in order to instruct the children in the
-significance of Decoration Day and to foster patriotism among the
-foreign born, by descriptions of the Civil War. In one of the schools,
-filled with Italian children, an old soldier, a veteran in years and
-experience, gave a description of a battle in Tennessee, and of his
-personal adventures in using a pile of brush as an ambuscade and a
-fortification. Coming from the schoolhouse, an eager young Italian
-broke out, with characteristic vividness, into a description of his
-father’s campaigning under the leadership of Garibaldi, possibly
-from some obscure notion that that, too, was a civil war fought from
-principle, but more likely because the description of one battle
-had roused in his mind the memory of another such description. The
-lecturer, whose sympathies happened to be on the other side of the
-Garibaldian conflict, somewhat sharply told him that he must forget
-all that; that he was no longer an Italian, but an American. The
-natural growth of patriotism based upon respect for the achievements
-of one’s fathers, the bringing together of the past with the present,
-the significance of the almost world-wide effort at a higher standard
-of political freedom which swept over all Europe and America between
-1848 and 1872 could, of course, have no place in the boy’s mind because
-it had none in the mind of the instructor whose patriotism apparently
-tried to purify itself by the American process of elimination.
-
-How far a certain cosmopolitan humanitarianism ignoring national
-differences, is either possible or desirable, it is difficult to
-state; but certain it is that the old type of patriotism, founded
-upon a common national history and land occupation, becomes to many
-of the immigrants who bring it with them a veritable stumbling-block
-and impediment. Many Greeks whom I know are fairly besotted with a
-consciousness of their national importance, and the achievements
-of their glorious past. Among them the usual effort to found a new
-patriotism upon American history is often an absurd undertaking; for
-instance, on the night of one Thanksgiving Day, I spent some time and
-zeal in a description of the Pilgrim Fathers, and the motives which
-had driven them across the sea, while the experiences of the Plymouth
-colony were illustrated by stereopticon slides and little dramatic
-scenes. The audience of Greeks listened respectfully, although I
-was uneasily conscious of the somewhat feeble attempt to boast of
-Anglo-Saxon achievement in hardihood and privation, to men whose powers
-of admiration were absorbed in their Greek background of philosophy and
-beauty. At any rate, after the lecture was over, one of the Greeks said
-to me, quite simply, “I wish I could describe my ancestors to you; they
-were very different from yours.” His further remarks were translated
-by a little Irish boy of eleven, who speaks modern Greek with facility
-and turns many an honest penny by translating, into the somewhat pert
-statement: “He says if _that_ is what your ancestors are like, that his
-could beat them out.” It is a good illustration of our faculty for
-ignoring the past, and of our failure to understand the immigrant’s
-estimation of ourselves. This lack of a more cosmopolitan standard, of
-a consciousness of kind founded upon creative imagination and historic
-knowledge is apparent in many directions, and cruelly widens the gulf
-between immigrant fathers and their children who are “Americans in
-process.”
-
-A hideous story comes from New York of a young Russian Jewess who was
-employed as a stenographer in a down-town office, where she became
-engaged to be married to a young man of Jewish-American parentage.
-She felt keenly the difference between him and her newly immigrated
-parents, and on the night when he was to be presented to them she
-went home early to make every possible preparation for his coming.
-Her efforts to make the _ménage_ presentable were so discouraging,
-the whole situation filled her with such chagrin, that an hour before
-his expected arrival, she ended her life. Although the father was a
-Talmud scholar of standing in his native Russian town, and the lover
-was a clerk of very superficial attainments, she possessed no standard
-by which to judge the two men. This lack of standard must be charged
-to the entire community; for why should we expect an untrained girl
-to be able to do for herself what the community so pitifully fails to
-accomplish?
-
-All the members of the community are equally stupid in throwing away
-the immigrant revelation of social customs and inherited energy.
-We continually allow this valuable human experience to go to waste
-although we have reached the stage of humanitarianism when no infant
-may be wantonly allowed to die, no man be permitted to freeze or
-starve, if the State can prevent it. We may truthfully boast that the
-primitive, wasteful struggle of physical existence is practically over,
-but no such statement can be made in regard to spiritual life. Students
-of social conditions recognize the fact that modern charity constantly
-grows more democratic and constructive, and daily more concerned for
-preventive measures, but to admit frankly similar aims as matters for
-municipal government as yet seems impossible.
-
-In this country it seems to be only the politician at the bottom,
-the man nearest the people, who understands that there is a growing
-disinterestedness taking hold of men’s hopes and imaginations in every
-direction. He often plays upon it and betrays it; but he at least knows
-it is there.
-
-The two points at which government is developing most rapidly at the
-present moment are naturally the two where it of necessity exercises
-functions of nurture and protection: first, in relation to the young
-criminal, second, in relation to the poor and dependent. One of the
-latest developments is the Juvenile Courts which the large cities are
-inaugurating. Only fifteen years ago when I first went to live in an
-industrial district of Chicago, if a boy was arrested on some trifling
-charge--and dozens of them were thus arrested each month--the only
-possible way to secure another chance for him by restoring him to his
-home with an opportunity to become a law-abiding citizen, was through
-the alderman of the ward. Upon the request of a distracted relative
-or the precinct captain, the alderman would “speak to the judge”
-and secure the release of the boy. The kindness of the alderman was
-genuine, as was the gratitude of all concerned; but the inevitable
-impression remained that government was harsh, and naturally dealt out
-policemen and prisons, and that the political friend alone stood for
-kindness. That this kindness was in a measure illicit and mysterious in
-its workings made it all the more impressive.
-
-But so much advance has been made in so short a time as fifteen years,
-toward incorporating kindly concern for the young and a desire to keep
-them in the path of rectitude within the process of government itself,
-that in Chicago alone twenty-four probation officers, as they are
-called, are paid from the public funds. The wayward boy is committed
-to one of these for another chance as a part of the procedure of the
-court. He is not merely released by an act of clemency so magnificent
-and irrelevant as to dazzle him with a sense of the aldermanic power,
-but he is put under the actual care of a probation officer that he may
-do better. He is assisted to keep permanently away from the police
-courts and their allied penal institutions.
-
-In one of the most successful of these courts, that of Denver, the
-Judge who can point to a remarkable record with the bad boys of the
-city, plays a veritable game with them against the police force, he
-and the boys undertaking to be good without the help of repression,
-and in spite of the machinations of the police. For instance, if the
-boys who have been sentenced to the State Reform School at Golden,
-deliver themselves without the aid of the Sheriff whose duty it is to
-take them there, they not only vindicate their manliness and readiness
-“to take their medicine,” but they beat the sheriff who belongs to the
-penal machinery out of his five-dollar fee. Over this fact they openly
-triumph--a simple example, perhaps, but significant of the attitude of
-the well-intentioned toward repressive government.
-
-The Juvenile Courts are beginning to take a really parental attitude
-towards all dependent children, although for years only those orphans
-who had inherited at least a meagre property were handed over to a
-public guardian. Those whose parents had left them absolutely nothing
-were allowed to care for themselves--as if the whole body of doctrine
-contained in the phrase, “there is no wealth but life,” had never
-entered into the mind of man. Because these courts are dealing with
-the children in their social and everyday relations they have made the
-astounding discovery that even a penniless child needs the care and
-defense of the State.
-
-The schools for Reform are those which are inaugurating the most
-advanced education in agriculture and manual arts. A bewildered foreign
-parent comes from time to time to Hull-House, asking that his boy be
-sent to a school to learn farming, basing his request upon the fact
-that his neighbor’s boy has been sent to “a nice green, country-place.”
-It is carefully explained that the neighbor’s boy was bad, and was
-arrested and sent away because of his badness. After much conversation,
-the disappointed parent sometimes understands, but he often goes away
-shaking his head, and some such words as these issue: “I have been
-in this country for five years, and have never gotten anything yet.”
-At other times it is successfully explained to the man that the city
-assumes that he is looking out for himself and taking care of his own
-boy, but it ought to be possible to make him to see that if he feels
-that his son needs the education of a farm school, that it lies with
-him to agitate the subject and to vote for the man who will secure such
-schools. He might well look amazed, were this advice tendered him, for
-these questions have never been presented to him to vote upon. Because
-he does not eagerly discuss the tariff or other remote subjects which
-the political parties present to him from time to time we assume that
-he is not to be trusted to vote on the education of his child, although
-there is no doubt that the one thing his ancestors decided upon, from
-the days of bows and arrows, was the sort of training each one should
-give his son.
-
-The fine education that is given to a juvenile offender may indicate
-a certain compunction on the part of the State. Quite as men formerly
-gloried in warfare and now apologize for it, as they formerly went
-out to spoil their enemies and now go to civilize them, so civil
-governments, while continuing to maintain prisons, have become more
-or less ashamed of them, and are already experimenting in better
-ways to elevate and reform criminals than by the way of violence and
-imprisonment. We have already said in America that neither a gallows
-nor an unmitigated prison shall ever exist for a child.
-
-In the matter of public charities, also, we are not timid as to
-extending the function of the government. We build enormous city
-hospitals and almhouses; we care with tenderness for the defective and
-the dependent; but for that great mass of people just beyond the line,
-from whom they are constantly recruited, we do practically nothing.
-It has been said that if a workingman in New York falls a victim to
-pneumonia, he is taken to a hospital and given skilled treatment; if it
-leaves him tubercular the city will have a care over him, and valiantly
-will stand by, putting him into a public sanatorium, providing him
-with nutritious food and fresh air until his recovery. But if he is
-turned away from the hospital without tuberculosis, merely too depleted
-and wretched to go back to his regular employment, then the city can
-do nothing for him unless he be ready to call himself an out-and-out
-pauper. We are afraid of the notion of governmental function which
-would minister to the primitive needs of the mass of the people,
-although we are quite ready to care for him whom misfortune or disease
-has made the exception. It is really the rank and file, the average
-citizen, who is ignored by the government, while he works out his real
-problems through other agencies, although he is scolded for staying at
-home on election day, and for refusing to be interested in issues which
-really do not concern him.
-
-It is comparatively easy to understand the punitive point of view which
-seeks to suppress, or the philanthropic which seeks to palliate; but
-it is much more difficult to formulate that city government which is
-adapted to our present normal living. As over against the survivals
-of the first two, excellent and necessary as they are, we have but
-the few public parks and baths, the few band concerts and recreation
-piers--always excepting, of course, the public schools and the social
-activities slowly centering around them; for public education has long
-been a passion in America, and we seem to have been willing to make
-that an exception to our general theory of government.
-
-While governmental functions have shown this remarkable adaptation
-and growth in relation to the youth, whether he be in the public
-schools, in the Juvenile Court or in the reformatory, we hesitate
-to assume toward the adult this temper of the educator who humbly
-follows and at the same confidently leads the little child. While the
-State spends millions of dollars and employs thousands of servants to
-nurture and heal the sick and defective, it steadfastly refuses to
-extend its kindliness to the normal working man. The Socialists alone
-constantly appeal for this extension. They refuse, however, to deal
-with the present State and constantly take refuge in the formulae of
-a new scholasticism. Their orators are busily engaged in establishing
-two substitutes for human nature which they call “proletarian” and
-“capitalist.” They ignore the fact that varying, imperfect human nature
-is incalculable, and that to eliminate its varied and constantly
-changing elements is to face all the mistakes and miscalculations which
-gathered around the “fallen man,” or the “economic man,” or any other
-of the fixed norms which have from time to time been substituted for
-expanding and developing human life. In time “the proletarian” and “the
-capitalist” will become the impedimenta which it will be necessary to
-clear away in order to make room for the mass of living and breathing
-citizens with whom self-government must eventually deal.
-
-There is no doubt that the existence of the mass, the mere size of the
-modern city, increases the difficulty of the situation. Charles Booth’s
-maps portraying the standard of living for the people of London afford
-almost the only attempt at a general social survey of a modern city, at
-least so far as it may be predetermined from the standard of income.
-From his accompanying twelve volumes may be deduced the occupations of
-the people with their real wages, their family budget and their culture
-level, and, to a certain extent, their recreations and spiritual life.
-If one gives one’s self over to a moment of musing on this mass of
-information, so huge and so accurate, one is almost instinctively aware
-that any radical changes, so much needed in the blackest districts,
-must largely come from forces outside the life of the people. An
-enlarged mental life must come from the educationalist, increased
-wages from the business interests, alleviation of suffering from the
-philanthropists. What vehicle of correction is provided for the people
-themselves, what device has been invented for loosing that kindliness
-and mutual aid which is the marvel of all charity visitors? What broad
-basis has been laid down for a modification of their most genuine and
-pressing needs through their own initiative? The traditional Government
-expresses its activity in keeping the streets clean and the district
-lighted and policed. It is only during the last quarter of a century
-that the London County Council has erected decent houses, public
-baths, and many other devices for the purer social life of the people.
-American cities have gone no further, although they presumably started
-at workingmen’s representation a hundred years ago, so completely were
-the founders misled by the name of government, and the temptation to
-substitute the form of political democracy for real self-government
-dealing with advancing social ideals. Even now London has twenty-eight
-Borough Councils, in addition to the London County Council itself,
-fifteen hundred direct representatives of the people, as over against
-seventy in Chicago although the latter city has a population one-half
-as large. Paris has twenty Mayors, with corresponding machinery for
-local government, as over against the New York concentration in one
-huge City Hall, too often corrupt.
-
-In Germany, perhaps more than anywhere else, the government has
-come to concern itself with the primitive essential needs of its
-working-people. In their behalf, the Government has forced industry,
-in the person of the large manufacturers, to make an alliance with
-it. The manufacturers are taxed for accident insurance of workingmen,
-for old-age pensions and sick benefits; and a project is being formed
-in which they shall bear the large share of insurance against
-non-employment when it has been made clear that non-employment
-is the result of an economic crisis brought about through the
-maladministration of finance.
-
-Germany proposes to regulate the maximum amount of rent which
-landlords of certain types of houses may be permitted to require,
-quite as the usury laws limit the maximum amount of interest which
-may be demanded. And yet industry in Germany has flourished, and
-this control on behalf of the normal workingman as he faces life in
-his daily vocation has apparently not checked its systematic growth,
-nor limited its place in the world’s market. As a result of this
-constant supervision of industry, the German police although a part of
-a military government, are constantly employed in the regulation of
-social affairs; and in these branches of government it is remarked that
-they are dropping their military tone and assuming toward the people
-the attitude of helpers and protectors. The police force in Germany is
-the lowest executive organ of the interior government and there are,
-therefore, as many kinds of police departments as there are different
-departments in this interior government. They follow the Government
-inspectors of the forest, the railways, the fields and roads, to see
-that their instructions are obeyed. In the Department of Public
-Health it is the police officers who finally enforce instructions in
-regard to vaccination, meat inspection, sale of food-stuffs, and the
-transportation of animals; in the department of factory inspection
-the police not only enforce the provisions of the factory laws, but
-they are responsible for the books in which the wages paid to minors
-are recorded; and it is from the police stations that the cards of
-the Government insurance for working-people are issued. Any special
-investigation ordered by the legislature is, as a matter of course,
-undertaken by the police. These varied activities, of course, require
-men of education and ability, and the very extension of function has
-broken down the military ideal in the country where that ideal is most
-firmly intrenched. But in a Republic founded upon a revulsion from
-oppressive government we still keep the police close to their negative
-rôle of preserving order and arresting the criminal. The varied
-functions they perform in Germany would be impossible in America,
-because it would be hotly resented by the American business man who
-will not brook any governmental interference in industrial affairs.
-The inherited instinct that government is naturally oppressive, and
-that its inroads must be checked, has made it a matter of principle and
-patriotism to keep the functions of government more restricted and
-more military than has become true in military countries.
-
-Almost every Sunday in the Italian quarter in which I live various
-mutual benefit societies march with fife and drum and with a brave
-showing of banners, celebrating their achievement in having surrounded
-themselves by at least a thin wall of protection against disaster,
-upon having set up their mutual good will against the day of
-misfortune. These parades have all the emblems of patriotism; indeed,
-the associations present the primitive core of patriotism, brothers
-standing by each other against hostile forces from without. I assure
-you that no Fourth of July celebration, no rejoicing over the birth
-of an heir to the Italian throne, equals in heartiness and sincerity
-these simple celebrations. Again one longs to pour into the government
-of their adopted country all this affection and zeal, this real
-patriotism. A system of State insurance would be a very simple device
-and secure a large return.
-
-Are we in America retaining eighteenth-century traditions, while
-Germany is gradually evolving into a Government logically fitted to
-cope with the industrial situation of the twentieth century? Do we
-so fail to apprehend what democracy is, that we are really afraid to
-extend the functions of municipal administration? Have we lost that
-most conservative of all beliefs--the belief in the average man, and
-thereby forfeited Aristotle’s ideal of a city “where men live a common
-life for noble ends”?
-
-
-
-
- CHAPTER IV
-
- MILITARISM AND INDUSTRIAL LEGISLATION
-
-
-American cities have been slow to consider industrial questions as
-germane to government, and the Federal authorities have persistently
-treated the millions of immigrants who arrive every year upon a
-political theory and method adopted a century ago, because both of
-them ignore the fact that the organization of industry has completed
-a revolution during that period. The gigantic task of standardizing
-the successive nations of immigrants throughout the country has fallen
-upon workmen because they alone cannot ignore the actual industrial
-situation. To thousands of workmen the immigration problem is a
-question of holding a job against a constantly lowering standard of
-living, and to withstand this stream of “raw labor” means to them the
-maintenance of industrial efficiency and of life itself. Workingmen
-are engaged in a desperate struggle to maintain a standard of wages
-against the constant arrival of unskilled immigrants at the rate of
-three-quarters of a million a year, at the very period when the
-elaboration of machinery permits the largest use of unskilled men.
-
-It may be owing to the fact that the workingman is brought into direct
-contact with the situation as a desperate problem of a living wage
-against starvation; it may be that wisdom is at her old trick of
-residing in the hearts of the simple, or that this new idealism, which
-is that of a reasonable life and labor, must, from the very nature of
-things, proceed from those who labor; or possibly it may be because
-amelioration arises whence it is so sorely needed; but certainly it is
-true, that, while the rest of the country talks of assimilation as if
-it were a huge digestive apparatus, the man with whom the immigrant
-has come most sharply into competition, has been forced into fraternal
-relations with him.
-
-Curiously enough, however, as soon as the immigrant situation is
-frankly regarded as an industrial one, as these men must regard it,
-the political aspects of the industrial situation is revealed in the
-fact that trade organizations which openly concern themselves with
-the immigration problem on its industrial side, quickly take on the
-paraphernalia and machinery which have hitherto associated themselves
-only with governmental life and control. The trades unions have worked
-out all over again local autonomy, with central councils and national
-representative bodies and the use of the referendum vote; and they also
-exhibit many of the features of political corruption and manipulation.
-
-The first real lesson in self-government to many immigrants has come
-through the organization of labor unions, and it could come in no
-other way, for the union alone has appealed to their necessities. One
-sees the first indication of an idealism arising out of these primal
-necessities, and at moments one dares to hope that it may be sturdy
-enough and sufficiently founded upon experience to make some impression
-upon the tremendous immigration situation.
-
-The movements embodying a new idealism have traditionally sought refuge
-with those who are near to starvation. Although the spiritual struggle
-is associated with the solitary garret of the impassioned dreamer,
-it may be that the idealism fitted to our industrial democracy will
-be evolved in crowded sewer ditches and in noisy factories. It may
-be contended that this remarkable coming together of the workingman
-and the immigrant has been the result of an economic pressure, and is
-without merit or idealism, and that the trades union record on Chinese
-exclusion and negro discrimination has been damaging. Be that as it
-may, this assimilation between the immigrant and the workingman has
-exhibited amazing strength, which may be illustrated from two careful
-studies made in two different parts of the country.
-
-To quote first from a study made from the University of Wisconsin
-of the stock yards strike which took place in Chicago in 1904[6]:
-“Perhaps the fact of the greatest social significance is that this
-was not merely a strike of skilled labor for the unskilled, but was
-a strike of Americanized Irish, Germans, and Bohemians, in behalf of
-Slovaks, Poles, and Lithuanians.... This substitution of races in the
-stock yards has been a continuing process for twenty years. The older
-nationalities have already disappeared from the unskilled occupations,
-and the substitution of races has evidently run along the line of
-lower standard of living. The latest arrivals, the Lithuanians and
-Slovaks, are probably the most oppressed of the peasants of Europe.”
-The visitors who attended the crowded meetings of the strikers during
-the summer of 1904 and heard the same address successively translated
-by interpreters into six or eight languages, who saw the respect
-shown to the most uncouth of the speakers by the skilled American men
-representing a distinctly superior standard of life and thought, could
-never doubt the power of the labor organizations for amalgamation,
-whatever opinion they might hold concerning their other values. This
-may be said in spite of the fact that great industrial disturbances
-have arisen from the under-cutting of wages by the lowering of racial
-standard. Certainly the most notable of these have taken place in those
-industries and at those places in which the importation of immigrants
-has been deliberately fostered as a wage-lowering weapon; and even in
-those disturbances and under the shock and strain of a long strike,
-disintegration did not come along the line of race cleavage.
-
-The other study was made in the anthracite coal fields, and was
-undertaken from the University of Pennsylvania[7]: “The United
-Mine Workers of America is taking men of a score of nationalities,
-English-speaking and Slav, men of widely different creeds, languages,
-and customs, and of varying powers of industrial competition, and is
-welding them into an industrial brotherhood, each part of which can
-at least understand of the others that they are working for one great
-and common end. This bond of unionism is stronger than one can readily
-imagine who has not seen its mysterious workings or who has not been
-a victim of its members’ newly found enthusiasm. It is to-day the
-strongest tie that can bind together 147,000 mine workers and the
-thousands dependent upon them. It is more than religion, more than the
-social ties which hold together members of the same community.”
-
-It was during a remarkable struggle on the part of this amalgamation
-of men from all countries, that the United States government, in spite
-of itself, was driven to take a hand in an industrial situation,
-owing to the long strain and the intolerable suffering entailed upon
-the whole country. Even then, however, the Government endeavored to
-confine its investigation to the mere commercial questions of tonnage
-and freight rates with their political implications, and it was only
-when an aroused and moralized public opinion insisted upon it that
-the national commission was driven to consider the human aspects of
-the case. Because of this public opinion, columns of newspapers and
-days of investigation were given to the discussion of the deeds of
-violence, discussions having nothing to do with the original demands
-of the strikers and entering only into the value set upon human life
-by each of the contesting parties. Did the union encourage violence
-against non-union men, or did it really do everything to suppress
-violence? Did it live up to its creed which was to maintain a standard
-of living that families might be properly housed and protected from
-debilitating toil and disease, and that children might be nurtured into
-American citizenship? Did the operators protect their men as far as
-possible from mine damp, from length of hours proven by experience to
-be exhausting? Did they pay a wage to the mine laborer sufficient to
-allow him to send his children to school? Questions such as these, a
-study of the human problem, invaded the commission day after day during
-the sitting. One felt for the moment the first wave of a rising tide
-of humanitarianism, until the normal ideals of the laborer to secure
-food and shelter for his family, a security for his own old age, and
-a larger opportunity for his children became the ideals of democratic
-government.
-
-Let us imagine the result if, during the long anthracite strike, the
-humane instinct had so over-mastered the minds of the strikers, and so
-exalted their passions that they had lifted a hand against no man, even
-though he seemed to be endangering their cause before their eyes. Such
-a result might have come about, partly because the destruction of life
-had become abhorrent and impossible to them engaged as they were in
-the endeavor to raise life in the coal regions to a higher level, and
-partly because they would have scorned to destroy an enemy in order
-to achieve a mere negative result when the power lay within themselves
-to convert him into an ally, when they might have made him a source
-of help and power, a comrade of the same undertaking. If the element
-of battle, of mere self-seeking, could be eliminated from strikes,
-if they could remain a sheer uprising of the oppressed and underpaid
-to a self-conscious recognition of their condition, so unified, so
-irresistible as to sweep all the needy within its flood, we should have
-a tide rising, not to destruction, but to beneficence. Let us imagine
-the state of public feeling if there had been absolutely no act of
-violence traceable, directly or indirectly, to the union miners; if
-during the long months of the strike the great body of miners could
-have added the sanction of sustained conduct to their creed. Public
-sympathy would have led to an understanding of the need these miners
-were trying to meet, and the American nation itself might have been
-ready to ask for legislation concerning the minimum wage, and for
-protection to life and limb, equal to the legislation of New Zealand
-or Germany. But because the element of warfare unhappily did exist,
-government got back to its old business of repression.
-
-To preserve law and order is obviously the function of government
-everywhere; and yet in our complicated modern society, especially as
-thousands of varied peoples are crowded into cities, it is not always
-easy to see just where real social order lies. The officials themselves
-are sometimes perplexed, and at other times deliberately use the
-devices of government for their own ends. We may take once more in
-illustration the great strike in the Chicago stock-yards. The immediate
-object of the strike was the protection of the wages of the unskilled
-men from a cut of one cent per hour, although, of course, the unions
-of skilled men felt that this first invasion of the wages increased
-through the efforts of the union, would be but the entering wedge of an
-attempt to cut wages in all the trades represented in the stock-yards.
-Owing to the refusal on the part of the unions to accept arbitration
-offered by the packers at an embarrassing moment, and because of the
-failure of the unions to carry out the terms of a contract, the strike
-in its early stages completely lost the sympathy of that large part of
-the public dominated by ideals of business honor and fair dealing. It
-lost, too, the sympathy of that growing body of organized labor which
-is steadily advancing in a regard for the validity of the contract, and
-is faithfully cherishing the hope that in time the trades unions may
-universally attain an accredited business standing.
-
-The leaders after the first ten days were, therefore, forced to
-make the most of the purely human appeal which lay in the situation
-itself, that 30,000 men, including the allied trades, were losing
-weeks of wages, with a possible chance of the destruction of their
-unions on behalf of the unskilled who were the newly arrived Poles
-and Lithuanians, unable as yet to look out for themselves. Owing
-to the irregular and limited hours of work--a condition quite like
-that prevailing on the London docks before the great strike of the
-dockers--the weekly wage of these unskilled men was exceptionally low,
-and the plea of the strikers was based upon the duty of the strong
-to the weak. A chivalric call was issued that the standard of life
-might be raised to that designated as American, and that this mass of
-unskilled men might secure an education for their children. Of course
-no appeal could have been so strong as this purely human one which
-united for weeks thousands of men of a score of nationalities into that
-solidarity which only comes through a self-sacrificing devotion to an
-absorbing cause.
-
-The strike involved much suffering and many unforeseen complications.
-At the end of eight weeks the union leaders made the best terms
-possible. Through these terms the skilled workers were guaranteed
-against a reduction in wages, but no provision was made for the
-unskilled in whose behalf the strike had at first been undertaken.
-Although the hard-pressed leaders were willing to make this concession,
-the politicians in the meanwhile had seen the great value of the human
-sentiment which bases its appeal on the need of the under dog and which
-had successfully united this mass of workingmen into a new comradeship
-with the immigrants. The appeal was infinitely more valuable than any
-merely political cry, and the fact that the final terms of settlement
-were submitted to a referendum vote at once gave the local politicians
-a chance to avail themselves of this big, loosely defined sympathy.
-They did avail themselves of this in so dramatic a manner that they
-almost succeeded, solely upon that appeal, in taking the strike out of
-the hands of the legitimate officers and placing it in their own hands
-for their own political ends.
-
-The situation was a typical one, exemplifying the real aim of popular
-government with its concern for primitive needs, forced to seek
-expression outside of the organized channels of government. If the
-militia could have been called in, government would have been placed
-even more dramatically in the position of the oppressor of popular
-self-government. The phenomenal good order, the comparative lack of
-violence on the part of the striking workmen, gave no chance for the
-bringing in of the militia. The city politician was of course very much
-disappointed, for it would have afforded him an opening to put the
-odium of this traditional opposition of government, an opposition which
-has always been most dramatically embodied in the soldier, upon the
-political party dominating the State but not the city. It would have
-given the city politician an excellent opportunity to show the concern
-of himself and his party for the real people, as over against the
-attitude of the party dominating the State. But because the militia was
-not called, his scheme failed, and the legitimate strike leaders who,
-although they passed through much tribulation because of this political
-interference, did not eventually lose control.
-
-The situation in the Chicago stock-yards also afforded an excellent
-epitome of the fact that government so often finds itself, not only in
-opposition to the expressed will of the people making the demand at the
-moment, but apparently against the best instincts of the mass of the
-citizens as a whole.
-
-For years the city administration had so protected the property
-interests invested in the stock-yards, that none of the sanitary
-ordinances had ever been properly enforced. The sickening stench and
-the scum on the branch of the river known as Bubbly Creek at times
-made that section of the city unendurable. The smoke ordinances were
-openly ignored, nor did the meat inspector ever seriously interfere
-with business, being quite willing to have meat sold in Chicago which
-had not passed the inspection for foreign markets. The water steals,
-too, for which the stock-yards were at one time notorious, must have
-been more or less known to certain officials. But all this merely
-corrupted a limited number of inspectors, and although their corruption
-was complete and involved entire administrations, it did not actually
-touch large numbers of persons. During the strike of 1904, however,
-1,200 policemen, actual men possessed of human sensibilities, were
-called upon to patrol the yards inside and out. There is no doubt
-that the police inspector of the district thoroughly represented the
-alliance of the City Hall with the business interests, that he did
-not mean to discover anything which was derogatory to the packers nor
-to embarrass them in any way during the conduct of the strike. Had
-these 1,200 men, more than a regiment in numbers, been a regiment in
-training and tradition, they, too, would have seen nothing, and would
-have been content at heart, as they were obliged to be in conduct, to
-have arrested the strikers on the slightest provocation, and to have
-protected the strike-breakers.
-
-But they were, in point of fact, called upon to face a very peculiar
-situation, because of the type of men and women who formed the bulk
-of the strike-breakers, and because, during the first weeks of the
-strike, these men and women were kept constantly inside the yards,
-day and night. In order to hold them at all, discipline outside of
-working hours was thoroughly relaxed, and the policemen in charge
-of the yards, while there ostensibly to enforce law and order, were
-obliged every night to connive at prize-fighting, at open gambling, and
-at prostitution. They were there, not to enforce law and order as it
-defines itself in the minds of the bulk of healthy-minded citizens, but
-only to keep the strikers from molesting the non-union workers. This
-was certainly commendable, but, after all, only part of their real duty.
-
-Because they were normal men living in the midst of normal life and
-not in barracks, they were shocked by the law-breaking which they were
-ordered to protect, and much drawn in sympathy to the strikers whom
-they were supposed to regard as public enemies. An investigator who
-interviewed one hundred policemen found only one who did not frankly
-extol the virtues of the strikers as over against the shocking vices of
-the imported men. This, of course, was an extreme case brought about by
-the unusual and peculiar type of the imported strike-breakers. There
-is, however, trustworthy evidence incorporated in affidavits which were
-at the time submitted to the Mayor of Chicago, concerning the unlawful
-conduct of the men who were under the protection of the city police.
-
-It was hard for a patriot not to feel jealous of the union and of the
-enthusiasm of those newly emigrated citizens. They poured out their
-gratitude and affection upon this first big friendly force which had
-offered them help in their desperate struggle in the New World. This
-devotion, this comradeship, and this fine _esprit de corps_ should have
-been won by the Government itself from these newly arrived, scared,
-and untrained citizens. The union was that which had concerned itself
-with the real struggle for life, shelter, a chance to work, and bread
-for their children. It had come to them in a language they could
-understand, through men with interests akin to their own, and it gave
-them both their first chance to express themselves through a democratic
-vote, and an opportunity to register by a ballot their real opinion
-upon a very important matter.
-
-They used the referendum votes, the latest and perhaps the most clever
-device of democratic government, and yet they used it to decide a
-question which the government supposed to be quite outside its realm.
-When they left the old country, the government of America held their
-deepest hopes, and represented that which they believed would obtain
-for them the fullness of life denied them in the lands of oppressive
-governments. It is a curious commentary on the fact that we have not
-yet attained self-government when the real and legitimate objects of
-men’s desires must still be incorporated in those voluntary groups for
-which the government, when it does its best, can only afford protection
-from interference. As the religious revivalist looks with longing upon
-the fervor of a single-tax meeting, as the orthodox Jew sees his son
-stay away from Yom Kippur service in order to pour all his religious
-fervor, his precious zeal for righteousness which has been gathered
-through the centuries, into the Socialist Labor Party--so a patriot
-finds himself exclaiming to the immigrant, like another Andrea del
-Sarto to his wife, “Oh, but what do they--what do they to please you
-more?”
-
-The stock-yards strike afforded an example of the national appeal
-subordinated to an appeal made in the name of labor. During the early
-stages of the strike it was discovered that newly arrived Macedonians
-were taking many of the places vacated by the strikers. One of the
-most touching scenes during the strike was the groups of Macedonians
-who would sit together in the twilight playing on primitive pipes
-singularly like the one which is associated with the great god Pan. The
-slender song would carry amazingly in the smoke-bedimmed air, affecting
-the spectator with a curious sense of incongruity.
-
-When the organized labor of Chicago discovered that the strikers’
-places were taken by Greeks, the unions threatened, unless the Greeks
-were “called off,” to boycott the Greek fruit-dealers all over the
-city, who with their street stands are singularly dependent upon
-the patronage of workingmen. The fact that the strike-breakers were
-Macedonians, as it happened, was an additional advantage at the
-moment; for the Greeks have been much concerned to make it clear that
-Macedonia belongs to Greece, and have hotly resented the efforts of
-Bulgaria to establish a protectorate over the country. They therefore
-responded at once to this acknowledgment of their claim, and, partly to
-show that the Macedonians and Greeks were countrymen, partly because
-they resented the implication that a Greek could act a cowardly part
-in any situation, and also, doubtless, because they were merchants
-threatened with loss of trade, they made superhuman efforts to clear
-the yards of Macedonians. This they accomplished in a remarkably short
-time. So reckless were they in the methods they used that it was
-common gossip throughout the Greek colony that strike-breakers would
-be refused the comforts of religion by the Greek priests in the city,
-although doubtless this rumor was unfounded. This utter recklessness
-of method, this determination to deter strike-breaking at any cost,
-is, of course, a revelation of the war element which is an essential
-part of any strike. The appeal to “loyalty” is the nearest approach to
-a moral appeal which can be safely made in the midst of a war of any
-sort. During a long strike one result of the non-moral appeal is to
-confuse the situation so that it becomes utterly impossible to tell how
-many men refuse to become strike-breakers because they are terrorized
-and how many stay away from conviction. The non-moral appeal not only
-sins against the principles advocated by trades unionists, but it
-contradicts itself and brings great confusion into the situation, as
-war ideals always do when thrust into a peaceful society. It was, for
-instance, quite impossible to tell whether the lowering in the type
-of man who was willing to take a striker’s place, so that at last
-only very ignorant men from the southern plantations could be induced
-to work, was due to a species of class consciousness, a response to
-the demand felt so strongly by labor men--“Thou shalt not take thy
-neighbor’s job”--or whether workingmen are becoming so afraid to take
-striker’s places that these places must at last be given to men who
-have come from such remote parts of the country that “they do not know
-enough to be afraid.” The unions themselves could take no accounting of
-their real strength because of the terrorism which had become thrust
-into the situation. And yet all that the stock-yards workers were
-demanding through this long and disastrous strike, was the minimum
-wage which has been guaranteed by conservative governments elsewhere,
-and is recognized even in the United States in much governmental work
-under the contracts of civil or Federal authorities. So timid are
-American cities, however, in dealing with this perfectly reasonable
-subject of wages in its relation to municipal employees, that when they
-do prescribe a minimum wage for city contract work, they allow it to
-fall into the hands of the petty politician and to become part of a
-political game, making no effort to give it a dignified treatment in
-relation to the cost of living and to the margin of leisure. In this
-the English cities have anticipated us, both as to time and legitimate
-procedure. Have Americans formed a sort of “imperialism of virtue,”
-holding on to preconceived ideals of government and insisting that
-they must fit all the people who come to our shores, even though they
-crush the most promising bits of self-expression in the process? Is the
-American attitude toward self-government like that of the Anglo-Saxon
-towards civilization, save that he goes forth to rule all the nations
-of the earth by one pattern, while we remain at home and bid them to
-rule themselves by one pattern? We firmly decline not only to consider
-matters of industry and commerce as germane to government, but we also
-decline to bring men together upon that most natural and inevitable of
-all foundations, their industrial needs.
-
-The government which refuses to consider matters of this sort, or at
-least waits until their neglect becomes a scandal before it consents to
-deal with them, as a result of this caution forces the most patriotic
-citizens to ignore the Government and to embody their scruples and
-hopes of progress in voluntary organizations. To be afraid to extend
-the functions of government may be to lose what we have. A government
-has always received feeble support from its constituents as soon as
-its demands appeared childish or remote. Citizens inevitably neglect
-or abandon civic duty, when their government no longer embodies their
-genuine desires. It is useless to hypnotize ourselves by unreal talk of
-colonial ideas, and of our patriotic duty towards immigrants as though
-the situation was one demanding the passage of a set of resolutions
-when we fail to realize that the nation can be saved only by patriots
-who are possessed of a contemporaneous knowledge.
-
-As industrial relations imply peaceful relations, under a certain
-rough reorganization and reconstruction of governmental functions
-which the association of labor presents, it is inevitable that in
-its international aspects the association should formally advocate
-universal peace. Workmen have always realized, however feebly and
-vaguely they may have expressed it, that it is they who in all ages
-have borne the heaviest burden of privation and suffering imposed on
-the world by the military spirit.
-
-The first international organization founded, not to promote a
-colorless peace, but to advance and develop the common life of all
-nations, was founded in London in 1864 by workingmen, and was called
-simply “The International Association of Workingmen.” They recognized
-that a supreme interest raised all workingmen above the prejudice of
-race, and united them by wider and deeper principles than those by
-which they were separated into nations. They hoped that as religion,
-science, art, had become international, so now at last labor might take
-its place as an international interest. A few years later, at its third
-congress in Brussels they recommended that in case of war a universal
-strike be declared.
-
-There is a growing conviction among workingmen of all countries
-that, whatever may be accomplished by a national war, however moral
-the supposed aim of such a war, there is one inevitable result--an
-increased standing army, the soldiers of which are non-producers, and
-must be fed by the workers.
-
-The surprising growth of Socialism, at the moment, is due largely to
-the fact that it is the only political party upon an international
-basis, and also that it frankly ventures its future upon a better
-industrial organization. These two aspects have had much more to do
-with its hold in industrial neighborhoods than have its philosophic
-tenets or the impassioned appeal of its propagandists. The Socialists
-are making almost the sole attempt to preach a morality sufficiently
-all-embracing and international to keep pace with even that material
-internationalism which has standarized the threads of screws and the
-size of bolts, so that machines may become interchangeable from one
-country to another. It is the same sort of internationalism which
-Mazzini preached when distracted Italy was making her desperate
-struggle for a unified and national life. He issued his remarkable
-address to her workingmen and solemnly told them that the life of the
-nation could not be made secure until her patriots were ready to die
-for human issues. He saw, earlier than most men, that the desire to
-be at unity with all human beings, to claim the sense of a universal
-affection is a force not to be ignored. He believed that it might
-even then be strong enough to devour the flimsy stuff called national
-honor, glory, and prestige, which incite to war and induce workingmen
-to trample over each other’s fields and to destroy the results of each
-other’s labor.
-
-Workingmen dream of an industrialism which shall be the handmaid of
-a commerce ministering to an increased power of consumption among
-the producers of the world, binding them together in a genuine
-internationalism. Existing commerce has long ago reached its
-international stage, but it has been the result of business aggression
-and constantly appeals for military defense and for the forcing of new
-markets. In so far as commerce has rested upon the successful capture
-of the resources of the workers, it has been a relic of the mediaeval
-baron issuing forth to seize the merchants’ boats as they passed his
-castle on the Rhine. It has logically lent itself to warfare, and is,
-indeed, the modern representative of conquest. As its prototype rested
-upon slavery and vassalage, so this commerce is founded upon a contempt
-for the worker and believes that he can live on low wages. It assumes
-that his legitimate wants are the animal ones comprising merely food
-and shelter and the cost of replacement. The industrialism of which
-this commerce is a part, exhibits this same contemptuous attitude, but
-it is more easily extended to immigrants than to any other sort of
-workmen because they seem further away from a common standard of life.
-This attitude toward the immigrant simply illustrates once more that it
-is around the deeply significant idea of the standard of life that our
-industrial problems of to-day centre. The desire for a higher standard
-of living in reality forms the base of all the forward movements of
-the working class. “The significance of the standard of life lies not
-so much in the fact that for each of us it is different, as that for
-all of us it is progressive,”[8] constantly invading new realms. To
-imagine that for immigrants it is merely a question of tin cups and
-plates stored in a bunk _versus_ a white cloth and a cottage table,
-and that all goes well if sewing-machines and cottage-organs reach
-the first generation of immigrants, and fashionable dressmakers and
-pianos the second, is of course a most untutored interpretation. Until
-the standard of life is apprehended in its real significance and made
-the crux of the immigrant situation, as recent economists are making
-the power of consumption the test of a nation’s prosperity, we shall
-continue to ignore the most obvious and natural basis for understanding
-and mutual citizenship.
-
-Because workmen have been forced to consider this standard of living
-in regard to immigrants as well as themselves, they have made genuine
-efforts toward amalgamation. This is perhaps easily explained, for,
-after all, the man in this country who realizes human equality is not
-he who repeats the formula of the eighteenth century, but he who has
-learned that the “idea of equality is an outgrowth of man’s primary
-relations with nature. Birth, growth, nutrition, reproduction, death,
-are the great levelers that remind us of the essential equality of
-human life. It is with the guarantee of equal opportunities to play
-our parts well in these primary processes that government is chiefly
-concerned”[9] and not merely with the repression of the vicious, nor
-with guarding the rights of property. All that devotion of the trades
-union for the real issues and trials of life could, of course, easily
-be turned into a passion for self-government and for the development
-of the national life if we were really democratic from the modern
-evolutionary standpoint, and held our town-meetings upon the topics of
-vital concern.
-
-So long, however, as the Government declines to concern itself with
-these deeper issues involved in the standard of life and the industrial
-status of thousands of its citizens, we must lose it.
-
-If progress were inaugurated by those members of the community who
-possess the widest knowledge and superior moral insight, then social
-amelioration might be brought about without the bungling and mistakes
-which so distress us all. But, over and over again, salutary changes
-are projected and carried through by men of even less than the average
-ethical development, because their positions in life have brought them
-in contact with the ills of existing arrangements. To quote from John
-Morley: “In matters of social improvement, the most common reason
-why one hits upon a point of progress and not another, is that one
-happens to be more directly touched than the other by the unimproved
-practice.”[10] Perhaps this is a sufficient explanation of the fact
-that untrained workmen are entrusted with the difficult task of
-industrial amelioration and adjustment, while the rest of the community
-often seems ignorant of the truth that institutions which do not march
-with the extension of human needs and relationships are dead, and may
-easily become a deterrent to social progress. Unless we subordinate
-class interests and class feeling to a broader conception of social
-progress, unless we take pains to come in contact with the surging and
-diverse peoples who make up the nation, we cannot hope to attain a sane
-social development. We need rigid enforcement of the existing laws,
-while at the same time, we frankly admit the inadequacy of these laws,
-and work without stint for progressive regulations better fitted to
-the newer issues among which our lot is cast; for, unless the growing
-conscience is successfully embodied in legal enactment, men lose the
-habit of turning to the law for guidance and redress.
-
-I recall, in illustration of this, an instance which took place fifteen
-years ago. I had newly come to Chicago, fresh from the country, and had
-little idea of the social and industrial conditions in which I found
-myself on Halsted Street, when a dozen girls came from a neighboring
-factory with a grievance in regard to their wages. The affair could
-hardly have been called a labor difficulty. The girls had never heard
-of a trades union, and were totally unaccustomed to acting together.
-It was more in the nature of a “scrap” between themselves and their
-foreman. In the effort toward adjustment, there remains vividly in my
-memory a conversation I had with a leading judge who arbitrated the
-difficulty. He expressed his belief in the capacity of the common law
-to meet all legitimate labor difficulties as they arise. He trusted
-its remarkable adaptability to changing conditions under the decisions
-of wise and progressive judges. He contended, however, that, in order
-to adjust it to our industrial affairs, it must be interpreted, not so
-much in relation to precedents established under a judicial order which
-belongs to the past, but in reference to that newer sense of justice
-which this generation is seeking to embody in industrial relations. He
-foresaw something of the stress and storm of the industrial conflicts
-which have occurred in Chicago since then, and he expressed the hope
-that the Bench of Cook County might seize the opportunity, in this
-new and difficult situation, of dealing with labor difficulties in a
-judicial spirit.
-
-What a difference it would have made in the history of Chicago during
-the last fifteen years if more men had been possessed of this temper
-and wisdom, and had refused to countenance the use of force. If more
-men had been able to see the situation through a fresher medium; to
-apprehend that the old legal enactments were too individualistic and
-narrow; that a difference in degree may make a difference in kind;
-if they had realized that they were the first generation of American
-jurists who had to deal with a situation made novel by the fact that
-it was brought about by the coming together of two millions of people
-largely on an industrial basis!
-
-Our constitutions were constructed by the advanced men of the
-eighteenth century, who had studied the works of the most radical
-thinkers of that century. Radicalism then meant a more democratic
-political organization, and in its defence, they fearlessly quoted the
-Greek city and the Roman Forum. But we have come to admit that our
-present difficulties are connected with our industrial organization
-and with the lack of connection between that organization and our
-inherited democratic form of government. If self-government were
-to be inaugurated by the advanced men of the present moment, they
-would make a most careful research into those early organizations of
-village communities, folk-motes, and mirs, those primary cells of
-both industrial and political organizations, where the people knew
-no difference between the two, but, quite simply, met to consider in
-common discussion all that concerned their common life. They would
-investigate the crafts, guilds, and artels, which combine government
-with daily occupations, as did the self-governing university and free
-town. They would seek for the connection between the liberty-loving
-mediaeval city and its free creative architecture, that art which
-combines the greatest variety of artists and artisans. They would
-not altogether ignore the “compulsion of origins” and the fact that
-our present civilization is most emphatically an industrial one. In
-Germany, when the Social Democratic party first vigorously asserted the
-economic basis of society and laid the emphasis upon its industrial
-aspect, the Government itself, in a series of legislative measures,
-designated “the Socialism of Bismarck,” found itself dealing directly
-with industry, through a sheer effort to give itself a touch of
-reality. The Government of Russia, in the first year of the Japanese
-War, made an effort to relieve the needs of the people. The bureaucracy
-itself organized the workmen into a species of trades unions through
-which the Russian Government promised to protect the proletarian from
-the aggressions of capital. The entire incident was suggestive of the
-protection afforded by the central State to the slowly emancipated
-serfs of central Europe when the barons, reluctant to give up their
-rights and privileges, so unjustly oppressed them.
-
-Shall a democracy be slower than these old Powers to protect its
-humblest citizen, and shall it see them slowly deteriorating because,
-according to democratic theory, they do not need protection?
-
-
-FOOTNOTES:
-
-[6] Trade Unionism and Labor Problems, by John R. Commons, page 248.
-
-[7] “The Slav Invasion,” by F. J. Warne, pages 118, 119.
-
-[8] The Standard of Life, by Mrs. Bernard Bosanquet, page 4.
-
-[9] The American City. Delos F. Wilcox, page 200.
-
-[10] Compromise, John Morley, page 213.
-
-
-
-
- CHAPTER V
-
- GROUP MORALITY IN THE LABOR MOVEMENT
-
-
-This generation is constantly confronted by radical industrial changes,
-from which the community as a whole profits, but which must inevitably
-bring difficulty of adjustment and disaster to men of certain trades.
-In all fairness, these difficulties should be distributed and should
-not be allowed to fall completely upon the group of working-people
-whose labor is displaced as a result of the changes and who are obliged
-to learn anew their method of work and mode of life.
-
-If the great industrial changes could be considered as belonging
-to the community as a whole and could be reasonably dealt with,
-the situation would then be difficult enough, but it is enormously
-complicated by the fact that society has become divided into camps in
-relation to the industrial system and that many times the factions
-break out into active hostility. These two camps inevitably develop
-group morality--the employers tending toward the legal and contractual
-development of morality, the workingmen toward the sympathetic
-and human. Among our contemporaries, these two are typified by the
-employers associations and the trades unions.
-
-It is always difficult to judge a contemporaneous movement with any
-degree of fairness, and it is perennially perplexing to distinguish
-what is merely adventitious and temporary from that which represents
-essential and permanent tendencies. This discrimination is made much
-more difficult when a movement exhibits various stages of development
-contemporaneously, when a dozen historic phases are going on at the
-same time. Yet every historic movement towards democracy, which
-constantly gathers to itself large bodies of raw recruits while the
-older groups are moving on, presents this peculiar difficulty. In the
-case of trades unions, certain groups are marked by lawlessness and
-disorder, others by most decorous business methods, and still others
-are fairly decadent in their desire for monopolistic control. It is a
-long cry from the Chartists of 1839, burning hayricks, to John Burns of
-1902, pleading in the House of Commons with well-reasoned eloquence for
-an extension of the workingmen’s franchise. Nevertheless they are both
-manifestations of the same movement towards universal suffrage and show
-no greater difference than that between the Chicago teamsters, who
-were blocking commerce and almost barricading the streets in 1902 when
-at the same moment John Mitchell made his well-considered statement
-that he would rather lose the coal strike, with all that that loss
-implied, than gain it at the cost of violence. Students of industrial
-history will point out the sequence and development of the political
-movement from the Chartist to the Independent Labor party. They will
-tell us that the same desire burned in the hearts of the ignorant
-farmers which fired the distinguished parliamentarian, but they give
-no help to our bewildered minds when we would fain discover some order
-and sequence between the widely separated events of the contemporaneous
-labor movement.
-
-We must first get down to the question, In what does “the inevitably
-destined rise of the men of labor” consist? What are we trying to
-solve in this “most hazardous problem of the age”? Is progress in the
-labor movement to come, as we are told progress comes in the non-moral
-world, by the blind, brute struggle of individual interests; or is it
-to come, as its earlier leaders believed, through the operation of the
-human will? Is it a question of morals which must depend upon educators
-and apostles; or is it merely a conflict of opposing rights which may
-legitimately use coercion? The question, from the very nature of the
-case, is confusing; for, of necessity, the labor movement has perfectly
-legitimate economic and business aspects, which loom large and easily
-overshadow the ethical. We would all agree that only when men have
-education, a margin of leisure, and a decent home can they find room to
-develop the moral life. Before that, there are too many chances that
-it will be crushed out by ignorance, by grinding weariness, and by
-indecency. But the danger lies in the conviction that these advantages
-are to be secured by any means, moral or non-moral, and in holding them
-paramount to the inner life which they are supposed to nourish. The
-labor movement is confronted by that inevitable problem which confronts
-every movement and every individual. How far shall the compromise be
-made between the inner concept and the outer act? How may we concede
-what it is necessary to concede, without conceding all?
-
-We constantly forget that, in the last analysis, the spiritual growth
-of one social group is conditioned by the reaction of other social
-groups upon it. We ignore the fact that the worship of success, so long
-dominant in America, has taught the majority of our citizens to count
-only accomplishment and to make little inquiry concerning methods.
-Success has become the sole standard in regard to business enterprises
-and political parties, but it is evident that the public intends to
-call a halt before it is willing to apply the same standard to labor
-organizations.
-
-It is clear that the present moment is one of unusual crisis--that many
-of the trades unions of America have reached a transitional period,
-when they can no longer be mere propagandists, but are called upon to
-deal with concrete and difficult situations. When they were small and
-persecuted, they held to the faith and its implication of idealism. As
-they become larger and more powerful, they make terms with the life
-about them, and compromise as best they may with actual conditions.
-
-The older unions, which have reached the second stage that may be
-described as that of business dealing, are constantly hampered and
-harassed by the actions of the younger unions which are still in the
-enthusiastic stage. This embarrassment is especially notable just
-now, for, during this last period of prosperity, trades unions have
-increased enormously in numbers; the State Federation of Minnesota,
-for instance, reported an increase of six hundred per cent. in one
-year. Nearly all the well-established unions have been flooded by new
-members who are not yet assimilated and disciplined.
-
-During this period of extraordinary growth, the labor movement has
-naturally attracted to itself hundreds of organizations which are yet
-in their infancy and exhibit all the weakness of “group morality.” This
-doubtless tends to a conception of moral life which is as primitive as
-that which controlled the beginnings of patriotism, when the members
-of the newly conscious nation considered all those who were outside
-as possible oppressors and enemies, and were loyal only towards those
-whom their imagination included as belonging to the national life. They
-gave much, and demanded much, in the name of blood brothers, but were
-merciless to the rest of the world. In addition to its belligerent
-youth and its primitive morality, the newer union is prone to declare
-a strike, simply because the members have long suffered what they
-consider to be grievances, and the accumulated sense of unredressed
-wrong makes them eager for a chance to “fight for their rights.” At
-the same time, the employer always attempts his most vigorous attack
-upon a new union, both because he does not wish organized labor to
-obtain a foothold in his factory, and because his chances for success
-are greater before his employees are well disciplined in unionism.
-Nevertheless in actual conflict a young union will often make a more
-reckless fight than an older one, like the rough rider in contrast
-with the disciplined soldier. The members of a newly organized group
-naturally respond first to a sense of loyalty to each other as against
-their employers, and then to the wider consciousness of organized
-labor as against capital. This stage of trades unionism is full of
-war phraseology, with its “pickets” and “battle-grounds,” and is
-responsible for the most serious mistakes of the movement.
-
-The sense of group loyalty holds trades unionists longer than is normal
-to other groups, doubtless because of the constant accessions of those
-who are newly conscious of its claims.
-
-Those Chicago strikes, which, during the last few years, have
-been most notably characterized by disorder and the necessity for
-police interference, have almost universally been inaugurated by
-the newly organized unions. They have called to their aid the older
-organizations, and the latter have entered into the struggle many times
-under protest and most obviously against their best interests.
-
-The Chicago Federation of Labor has often given its official
-indorsement to hot-headed strikes on the part of “baby unions” because
-the delegates from the newly organized or freshly recruited unions had
-the larger vote, and the appeal to loyalty and to fraternity carried
-the meeting against the judgment of the delegates from the older unions.
-
-The members of newly organized unions more readily respond to the
-appeal to strike, in that it stirs memory of their “organization
-night,” when they were admitted after solemn ceremonies into the
-American Federation of Labor. At the same time, the organizers
-themselves often hold out too large promises, on the sordid side, of
-what organization will be able to accomplish. They tell the newly
-initiated what other unions have done, without telling at the same time
-how long they have been organized and how steadily they have paid dues.
-Several years ago, when there seemed to be a veritable “strike fever”
-in Chicago among the younger trades unions, it was suggested in the
-Federation of Labor that no union be authorized to declare a strike
-until it had been organized for at least two years. The regulation
-was backed by some of the strongest and wisest trades unionists,
-but it failed to pass because the organizers were convinced that it
-would cripple them in forming new unions. They would be obliged to
-point to many months of patient payment of dues and humdrum meetings
-before any real gain could be secured. The organizers, in fact, are
-in the position of a recruiting officer who is obliged to tell his
-raw material of all the glories of war, but at the same time bid them
-remember that warfare is always inexpedient. He must advise them to
-take a long and tedious training in the arts of diplomacy and in the
-most advanced methods of averting war before any action can possibly be
-considered.
-
-In point of fact the organizers do not do this, and many men join
-unions expecting that a strike will be speedily declared which will
-settle all the difficulties of modern industrialism. It is, therefore,
-not so remarkable that strikes should occur often and should exhibit
-warlike features. What is remarkable is the attitude of the public
-which has certainly eliminated the tactics of war in other civil
-relations.
-
-A tacit admission that a strike is war and that all the methods of
-warfare are permissible was made in Chicago during the teamsters’
-strike of 1905, when there was little protest against the war method
-of conducting a struggle between two private organizations, one of
-employer and one of employed. Why should the principles of legal
-adjustment have been thus complacently flung to the winds by the two
-millions of citizens who had no direct interest in this struggle, but
-whose pursuits in business were interfered with, whose safety on the
-streets was imperiled, and whose moral sensibilities were outraged?
-
-How did the public become hypnotized into a passive endurance of a
-street warfare in which two associations were engaged, like feudal
-chiefs with their recalcitrant retainers? In those similar cases, when
-blood grew too hot on both sides, the mediaeval emperor intervened and
-compelled peace. General public opinion is our hard-won substitute for
-the emperor’s personal will. Public opinion, however, did not assert
-itself and interfere--on the contrary, the entire town acquiesced in
-the statement of the contestants that this method of warfare was the
-only one possible, and thereupon yielded to a tendency to overvalue
-physical force and to ignore the subtler and less obvious conditions on
-which the public welfare rests. At that time all methods of arbitration
-and legal redress were completely set aside.
-
-There is no doubt but that ideas and words which at one time fill a
-community with enthusiasm may, after a few years, cease to be a moving
-force, apparently from no other reason than that they are spent and
-no longer fit into the temper of the hour. Such a fate has evidently
-befallen the word “arbitration,” at least in Chicago, as it is applied
-to industrial struggles. Almost immediately following the labor
-disturbances of 1894 in Chicago, the agitation was begun for a State
-Board of Arbitration, resulting in legislation and the appointment of
-the Illinois Board. At that time the public believed that arbitration
-would go far towards securing industrial peace, or at least that it
-would provide the device through which labor troubles could be speedily
-adjusted, and during that period there was much talk concerning
-compulsory arbitration with reference to the successful attempts in New
-Zealand.
-
-During the industrial struggles of later years, however, not only
-are the services of the State Board rejected, but voluntary bodies
-constantly find their efforts less satisfactory. Employers contend
-that arbitration implies the yielding of points on both sides.
-Since, however, most boards of arbitration provide that grievances
-must be submitted to them before the strike occurs, and the men are
-thus kept at work while the grievances are being considered, the men
-therefore have virtually nothing to lose by declaring a strike. They
-are subjected to a temptation to constantly formulate new demands,
-because, without losing time or pay, they are almost certain to secure
-some concession, however small, in their favor. The employers in the
-teamsters’ strike thus explained their position when they declared
-that there was nothing which could be submitted to arbitration. These
-employers also contended that the ordinary court has no precedent
-for dealing with questions of hours and wages, of shop rules, and
-many other causes of trade-union disputes, because all these matters
-are new as questions of law and can be satisfactorily adjusted only
-through industrial courts in which tradition and precedent bearing
-upon modern industrial conditions have been accumulated. The rise and
-fall of wages affect not one firm only, but a national industry, and
-even the currents of international trade, so that it is impossible to
-treat of them as matters in equity. With this explanation, the Chicago
-public rested content during the long weeks of the teamsters’ strike,
-for no one pointed out that these arguments did not apply to this
-particular situation, so accustomed have we grown in Chicago to warfare
-as a method of settling labor disputes. The charges of the Employers’
-Association against the teamsters did not involve any points demanding
-adjustment through industrial courts. The charges the Employers’
-Association made were those of broken contracts, of blackmail, and of
-conspiracy, all of them points which are constantly adjudicated in Cook
-County courts.
-
-It was constantly asserted that officers of the Teamsters’ Union
-demanded money from employers in the height of the busy season in order
-to avert threatened strikes; that there was a disgraceful alliance
-between certain members of the Team Owners’ Association and officers of
-the Teamsters’ Union.
-
-It would, of course, have been impossible to prove blackmail and
-the charges of “graft,” unless the employers themselves or their
-representatives had borne testimony, which would inevitably have
-implicated themselves. During the first weeks of the strike, these
-charges were freely made, definite sums were named, and dates were
-given. There was also an offer on the part of various managers to make
-affidavits, but later they shrank from the publicity, and refused to
-give them, preferring apparently to throw the whole town into disorder
-rather than to “stand up” to the consequences of their own acts and to
-acknowledge the bribery to which they claim they were forced to resort.
-They demonstrated once more that a show of manliness and an appeal to
-arms may many times hide cowardice.
-
-To throw affairs into a state of warfare is to put them where the moral
-aspect will not be scrutinized and where the mere interest of the game
-and a desire to watch it will be paramount.
-
-The vicious combination represented by certain men in the Team Owners’
-Association and in the Teamsters’ Union, “the labor and capital hunting
-together” kind, is a public menace which can be abolished only by a
-combined effort on the part of the best employers and the best labor
-men. The “better element” certainly were in a majority, for the most
-dangerous members of this sinister combination were at last reduced
-to fifteen or twenty men. These very men, however, after a prolonged
-strike, became either victors or martyrs, and in either case were
-firmly established in power and influence for the succeeding two
-years. Why should an entire city of two million people have been put
-to such an amazing amount of inconvenience and financial loss, with
-their characters brutalized as well, in order to accomplish this? The
-traditional burning of the house in order to roast the pig is quite
-outdone by this overturning of a city in order to catch a “score of
-rascals,” for in the end the rascals are not caught, and it is as if
-the house were burned and the pig had escaped. Was it not the result
-of acting under military fervor? Over and over again it has been found
-that organizations based upon a mutual sense of grievance or of outrage
-have always been militant, for while men cannot be formed permanently
-into associations whose chief bond is a sense of exasperation and
-wrong dealing, during the time they are thus held together they are
-committed to aggressive action.
-
-Moral rights and duties formed upon the relations of man to man are
-applicable to all situations, and to deny this applicability to a
-difficult case, is to beg the entire question. The consequences do not
-stop there, for we all know that to deny the validity of the moral
-principle in one relation is to sap its strength in all relations.
-
-Employers often resent being obliged to have business relations
-with workingmen, although they no longer say that they will refuse
-to deal with them, as a woman still permits herself to say that she
-“will not argue with a servant.” They nevertheless contend that the
-men are unreasonable, and that because it is impossible to establish
-contractual relations with them, they must be coerced. This contention
-goes far toward legitimatizing terrorism. It therefore seems to them
-defensible to refuse to go into the courts and to insist upon war
-because they do it from a consciousness of rectitude, although this
-insensibly slips into a consciousness of power, as self-righteousness
-is so prone to do. But these are all the traits of militant youth,
-which in the teamsters’ strike was indeed borne out by the facts in the
-case.
-
-The Employers’ Association of Chicago was largely composed of merchants
-whose experience with trades unionism was almost limited to the
-Teamsters’ Union which has been in existence for only five years and,
-from the first, has been truculent and difficult. Had the employers
-involved been manufacturers instead of merchants, they would have had
-years of experience with unions of skilled men, and they would have
-more nearly learned to adjust their personal and business relations
-to trades unionism. When an entire class in a community confess that
-without an appeal to arms they cannot deal with trades unions, who,
-after all, represent a national and international movement a hundred
-years old, they practically admit that they cannot manage their
-business under the existing conditions of modern life. To a very
-great extent it is a confession of weakness, to a very great extent a
-confession of frailty of temper. To make the adjustment to the peculiar
-problems of one’s own surroundings is the crux of life’s difficulties.
-“New organizations” and “new experiments in living” would not arise if
-there were not a certain inadequateness in existing organizations and
-ways of living. The new organizations and experiments may not point
-to the right mode of meeting the situation, but they do point to the
-existence of inadequateness and the need of readjustment. Changes in
-business methods have been multiform during the past fifteen years,
-and Chicago business men who have made those other adjustments would
-certainly be able to deal with labor in its present organized form if
-they were not inhibited by certain concepts of their “group morality.”
-
-In the meantime the public, which has been powerless to interfere, can
-only point to the consequences of grave social import which are sure to
-result from a prolonged period of disturbance.
-
-First, there is the sharp division of the community into classes, with
-its inevitable hostility and misunderstanding. Capital lines up on one
-side, and labor on the other, until the “fair-minded public” disappears
-and Chicago loses her democratic spirit which has always been her most
-precious possession. In its place is substituted loyalty to the side to
-which each man belongs, irrespective of the merits of the case--the “my
-country right or wrong” sentiment which we call patriotism only in war
-times, the blind adherence by which a man is attached against his will,
-as it were, to the blunders of “his own kind.”
-
-During the first week of the strike, I talked with labor men who were
-willing to admit that there were grounds for indictment against at
-least two of the officers in the teamsters’ locals. During the third
-week of the strike all that was swept aside, and one heard only that
-the situation must be taken quite by itself, with no references to
-the first causes, that it was a strike of organized capital against
-organized labor, and that we could have no peace in Chicago until it
-was “fought to a finish.”
-
-Second, there is an enormous increase in the feeling of race animosity,
-beginning with the imported negro strike-breakers, and easily extending
-to “Dagoes” and all other distinct nationalities. The principle of
-racial and class equality is at the basis of American political life,
-and to wantonly destroy it is one of the gravest outrages against the
-Republic.
-
-Chicago is preëminently a city of mixed nationalities. It is our
-problem to learn to live together in forbearance and understanding
-and to fuse all the nations of men into the newest and, perhaps,
-the highest type of citizenship. To accept this responsibility may
-constitute our finest contribution to the problems of American life,
-but we may also wantonly and easily throw away such an opportunity
-by the stirring up of race and national animosity which is so easily
-aroused and so reluctantly subsides.
-
-Third, there is the spirit of materialism which controls the city and
-confirms the belief that, after all, brute force, a trial of physical
-strength, is all that counts and the only thing worthy of admiration.
-Any check on the moral consciousness is paralyzed when the belief
-is once established that success is its own justification. When the
-stream of this belief joins the current of class interest, the spirit
-of the prize fighters’ ring which cheers the best round and worships
-the winner, becomes paramount. It is exactly that which appeals to
-the so-called “hoodlum,” and his sudden appearance upon the street
-at such times and in such surprising numbers demonstrates that he
-realizes that he has come to his own. At the moment we all forget that
-the determination to sacrifice all higher considerations to business
-efficiency, to make the machine move smoothly at any cost, “to stick
-at nothing,” may easily make a breach in the ethical constitution of
-society which can be made good only by years of painful reparation.
-
-Fourth, there is the effect upon the children and the youth of the
-entire city, for the furrow of class prejudice, which is so easily run
-through a plastic mind, often leaves a life-long mark. Each morning
-during the long weeks of the strike, thousands of children at the more
-comfortable breakfast tables learned to regard labor unions as the
-inciters of riot and the instruments of evil, thousands of children
-at the less comfortable breakfast tables shared the impotent rage
-of their parents that “law is always on the side of capital,” and
-both sets of children added to the horrors of Manchuria and Warsaw,
-which were then taking place, the pleasurable excitement that war
-had become domesticated upon their own streets. We may well believe
-that these impressions and emotions will be kept by these children
-as part of their equipment in life and that their moral conceptions
-will permanently tend toward group moralities and will be cast into a
-coarser mold.
-
-In illustration of this point I may, perhaps, cite my experience during
-the Spanish War.
-
-For ten years I had lived in a neighborhood which is by no means
-criminal, and yet during October and November of 1898 we were startled
-by seven murders within a radius of ten blocks. A little investigation
-of details and motives, the accident of a personal acquaintance with
-two of the criminals, made it not in the least difficult to trace
-the murders back to the influence of the war. Simple people who
-read of carnage and bloodshed easily receive suggestions. Habits of
-self-control which have been but slowly and imperfectly acquired
-quickly break down when such a stress is put upon them.
-
-Psychologists intimate that action is determined by the selection
-of the subject upon which the attention is habitually fixed. The
-newspapers, the theatrical posters, the street conversations for weeks,
-had to do with war and bloodshed. Day after day, the little children on
-the street played at war and at killing Spaniards. The humane instinct,
-which keeps in abeyance the tendency to cruelty, as well as the growing
-belief that the life of each human being, however hopeless or degraded,
-is still sacred, gives way, and the more primitive instinct asserts
-itself.
-
-There is much the same social result during a strike, in addition
-to the fact that the effect of the prolonged warfare upon the labor
-movement itself is most disastrous. The unions at such times easily
-raise into power the unscrupulous “leader,” so-called. In times of
-tumult, the aggressive man, the one who is of bellicose temper, and
-is reckless in his statements, is the one who becomes a leader. It is
-a vicious circle--the more warlike the times, the more reckless the
-leader who is demanded, and his reckless course prolongs the struggle.
-Such men make their appeal to loyalty for the union, to hatred and to
-contempt for the “non-union” man. Mutual hate towards a non-unionist
-may have in it the mere beginnings of fellowship, the protoplasm of
-tribal fealty, but no more. When it is carried over into civilized
-life it becomes a social deterrent and an actual menace to social
-relations.
-
-In a sense it is fair to hold every institution responsible for the
-type of man whom it tends to bring to the front, and the type of
-organization which clings to war methods must, of course, consider
-it nobler to yield to force than to justice. The earlier struggle of
-democracy was for its recognition as a possible form of government
-and the struggle is now on to prove democracy an efficient form of
-government. So the earlier struggles of trades unions were for mere
-existence, and the struggle has now passed into one for a recognition
-of contractual relations and collective bargaining which will make
-trades unions an effective industrial instrument. It is much less
-justifiable of course in the later effort than it was in the earlier to
-carry on the methods of primitive warfare.
-
-This new effort, however, from the very nature of things, is bringing
-another type of union man into office and is modifying the entire
-situation. The old-time agitator is no longer useful and a cooler man
-is needed for collective bargaining. At the same time the employers
-must put forth a more democratic and a more reasonable type of man if
-they would bear their side of this new bargaining, so that it has come
-about quite recently that the first attempts have been made in Chicago
-towards controlling in the interests of business itself this natural
-tendency of group morality.
-
-It may offer another example of business and commerce, affording us
-a larger morality than that which the moralists themselves teach.
-Certain it is that the industrial problems engendered by the industrial
-revolutions of the last century, and flung upon this century for
-solution, can never be solved by class warfare nor yet by ignoring
-their existence in the optimism of ignorance.
-
-America is only beginning to realize, and has not yet formulated, all
-the implications of the factory system and of the conditions of living
-which this well-established system imposes upon the workers. As we
-feel it closing down upon us, moments of restlessness and resentment
-seize us all. The protest against John Mitchell’s statement[11] that
-the American workingman has recognized that he is destined to remain
-a workingman, is a case in point. In their attempt to formulate and
-correct various industrial ills, trades unions are often blamed for
-what is inherent in the factory system itself and for those evils which
-can be cured only through a modification of that system. For instance,
-factory workers in general have for years exhibited a tendency to
-regulate the output of each worker to a certain amount which they
-consider a fair day’s work, although to many a worker such a restricted
-output may prove to be less than a fair day’s work. The result is, of
-course, disastrous to the workers themselves as well as to the factory
-management, for it doubtless is quite as injurious to a man’s nervous
-system to retard his natural pace as it is to unduly accelerate it.
-The real trouble, which this “limitation” is an awkward attempt to
-correct, is involved in the fact that the intricate subdivision of
-factory work, and the lack of understanding on the part of employees
-of the finished product, has made an unnatural situation, in which the
-worker has no normal interest in his work and no direct relation to it.
-In the various makeshifts on the part of the manufacturer to supply
-motives which shall take the place of the natural ones so obviously
-missing, many devices have been resorted to, such as “speeding up”
-machinery, “setting the pace,” and substituting “piece work” for day
-work. The manufacturers may justly say that they have been driven to
-these various expedients, not only by the factory conditions, but by
-the natural laziness of men. Nevertheless reaction from such a course
-is inevitably an uncompromising attempt on the part of the workers
-to protect themselves from overexertion and to regulate the output.
-The worst cases I have ever known have occurred in unorganized shops
-and have been unregulated and unaided by any trades union. The “pace
-setter” in such a shop is often driven out and treated with the same
-animosity which the “scab” receives in a union shop.
-
-In the same spirit we blame trades unionists for that disgraceful
-attitude which they have from time to time taken against the
-introduction of improved machinery--a small group blindly attempting
-to defend what they consider their only chance to work. The economists
-have done surprisingly little to shed light upon this difficulty;
-indeed, they are somewhat responsible for its exaggeration. Their old
-theory of a “wage fund” which did not reach the rank and file of trades
-unionists until at least in its first form it had been abandoned by the
-leading economists, has been responsible both for much disorder along
-this line, and for the other mistaken attempt “to make work for more
-men.”
-
-A society which made some effort to secure an equitable distribution of
-the leisure and increased ease which new inventions imply would remove
-the temptations as well as the odium of such action from the men who
-are blinded by what they consider an infringement of their rights.
-
-If the wonderful inventions of machinery, as they came along during
-the last century, could have been regarded as in some sense social
-possessions, the worst evils attending the factory system of
-production--starvation wages, exhausting hours, unnecessary monotony,
-child labor, and all the rest of the wretched list--might have been
-avoided in the interest of society itself. All this would have come
-about had human welfare been earlier regarded as a legitimate object of
-social interest.
-
-But no such ethics had been developed in the beginning of this century.
-Society regarded machinery as the absolute possession of the man who
-owned it at the moment it became a finished product, quite irrespective
-of the long line of inventors and workmen who represented its gradual
-growth and development. Society was, therefore, destined to all the
-maladjustment which this century has encountered. Is it the militant
-spirit once more as over against the newer humanitarianism? The
-possessor of the machine, like the possessor of arms who preceded him,
-regards it as a legitimate weapon for exploitation, as the former held
-his sword.
-
-One of the exhibits in the Paris Exposition of 1900 presented a
-contrast between a mediaeval drawing of a castle towering above the
-hamlets of its protected serfs, and a modern photograph of the same
-hill covered with a huge factory which overlooked the villages of
-its dependent workmen. The two pictures of the same hill and of the
-same plain bore more than a geographic resemblance. This suggestion
-of modern exploitation would be impossible had we learned the first
-lessons which an enlarged industrialism might teach us. Class and
-group divisions with their divergent moralities become most dangerous
-when their members believe that the inferior group or class cannot
-be appealed to by reason and fair dealing, but must be treated upon
-a lower plane. Terrorism is considered necessary and legitimate that
-they may be inhibited by fear from committing certain acts. So far
-as employers exhibit this spirit toward workmen, or trades unionists
-toward non-unionists, they inevitably revert to the use of brute
-force--to the methods of warfare.
-
-
-FOOTNOTES:
-
-[11] Organized Labor, John Mitchell. Preface.
-
-
-
-
- CHAPTER VI
-
- PROTECTION OF CHILDREN FOR INDUSTRIAL EFFICIENCY
-
-
-In the previous chapters it was stated that the United States, compared
-to the most advanced European nations, is deficient in protective
-legislation. This, as has been said, is the result of the emphasis
-placed upon personal liberty at the date of the first constitutional
-conventions and of the inherited belief in America that government is
-of necessity oppressive, and its functions not to be lightly extended.
-
-It is also possible that this protection of the humblest citizen has
-been pushed forward in those countries of a homogeneous population
-more rapidly than in America, because of that unconscious attitude of
-contempt which the nationality at the moment representing economic
-success always takes toward the weaker and less capable. There is no
-doubt that we all despise our immigrants a little because of their
-economic standing. The newly arrived immigrant goes very largely into
-unskilled work; he builds the railroads, digs the sewers, he does
-the sort of labor the English-speaking American soon gets rid of;
-and then, because he is in this lowest economic class, he falls into
-need, and we complain that in America the immigrant makes the largest
-claim upon charitable funds. Yet in England, where immigration has
-counted for very little; in Germany, where it has counted almost not
-at all, we find the same claim made upon the public funds by people
-who do the same unskilled work, who are paid the same irregular and
-low wages. In Germany, where this matter is approached, not from the
-charitable, but from the patriotic side, there is a tremendous code
-of legislation for the protection of the men who hold to life by the
-most uncertain economic tenure. In England there exists an elaborated
-code of labor laws, protecting the laborer at all times from accidents,
-in ways unknown in America. Here we have only the beginning of all
-that legislation, partly because we have not yet broken through the
-belief that the man who does this casual work is not yet quite one
-of ourselves. We do not consider him entitled to the protective
-legislation which is secured for him in other countries where he is
-quite simply a fellow-citizen, humble it may be, but still bound to the
-governing class by ties of blood and homogeneity.
-
-Our moral attitude toward one group in the community is a determining
-factor of our moral attitude toward other groups, and this relation of
-kindly contempt, of charitable rather than democratic obligation, may
-lend some explanation to the fact that the United States, as a nation,
-is sadly in arrears in the legislation designed for the protection of
-children. In the Southern States, where a contemptuous attitude towards
-a weaker people has had the most marked effect upon public feeling,
-we have not only the largest number of unprotected working children,
-but the largest number of illiterate children as well. There are, in
-the United States, according to the latest census[12] 580,000 children
-between the ages of ten and fourteen years, who cannot read nor write.
-They are not the immigrant children. They are our own native-born
-children. Of these 570,000 are in the Southern States and ten thousand
-of them are scattered over the rest of the Republic.
-
-The same thing is true of our children at work. We have two millions
-of them, according to the census of 1900--children under the age of
-sixteen years who are earning their own livings.
-
-Legislation of the States south of Maryland for the children is like
-the legislation of England in 1844. We are sixty-two years behind
-England in caring for the children of the textile industries.
-
-May we not also trace some of this national indifference to the
-disposition of the past century to love children without really knowing
-them? We refuse to recognize them as the great national asset and
-are content to surround them with a glamour of innocence and charm.
-We put them prematurely to work, ignorant of the havoc it brings,
-because no really careful study has been made of their capacities
-and possibilities--that is, no study really fitted to the industrial
-conditions in which they live.
-
-Each age has, of course, its own temptations and above all its own
-peculiar industrial temptations and needs to see them not only in the
-light of the increased sensibility and higher ethical standards of
-its contemporaries, but also in relation to its peculiar industrial
-development. When we ask why it is that child-labor has been given
-to us to discuss and to rectify, rather than to the people who
-lived before us, we need only to remember that, for the first
-time in industrial history, the labor of the little child has in
-many industries become as valuable as that of a man or woman. The
-old-fashioned weaver was obliged to possess skill and strength to pull
-his beam back and forth. It is only through the elaborated inventions
-of our own age that skill as well as strength has been so largely
-eliminated that, for example, a little child may “tend the thread” in
-a textile mill almost as well as an adult. This is true of so many
-industries that the temptation to exploit premature labor has become
-peculiar to this industrial epoch and we are tempted as never before to
-use the labor of little children.
-
-What, then, are we going to do about it? How deeply are we concerned
-that this labor shall not result to the detriment of the child, and
-what excuses are we making to ourselves for thus prematurely using up
-the strength which really belongs to the next generation? Of course,
-it is always difficult to see the wrong in a familiar thing; it is
-almost a test of moral insight to be able to see that an affair of
-familiar intercourse and daily living may also be wrong. I have taken a
-Chicago street-car on a night in December at ten o’clock, when dozens
-of little girls who had worked in the department stores all day were
-also boarding the cars. I know, as many others do, that these children
-will not get into their beds before midnight, and that they will have
-to be up again early in the morning to go to their daily work. And yet
-because I have seen it many times I take my car almost placidly--I am
-happy to say, not quite placidly. Almost every day at six o’clock I see
-certain factories pouring out a stream of men and women and boys and
-girls. The boys and girls have a peculiar hue--a color so distinctive
-that one meeting them on the street, even on Sunday when they are in
-their best clothes and mingled with other children who go to school and
-play out of doors, can distinguish them in an instant, and there is on
-their faces a premature anxiety and sense of responsibility, which we
-should declare pathetic if we were not used to it.
-
-How far are we responsible when we allow custom to blind our eyes
-to the things that are wrong? In spite of the enormous growth in
-charitable and correctional agencies designed for children, are we
-really so lacking in moral insight and vigor that we fail even to
-perceive the real temptation of our age and totally fail to grapple
-with it? An enlightened State which regarded the industrial situation
-seriously would wish to conserve the ability of its youth, to give them
-valuable training in relation to industry, quite as the old-fashioned
-State carefully calculated the years which were the most valuable for
-military training. The latter, looking only toward the preservation of
-the State, took infinite pains, while we are careless in regard to the
-much greater task which has to do with its upbuilding and extension. We
-conscientiously ignore industry in relation to government and because
-we assume that its regulation is unnecessary, so we conclude that the
-protection of the young from premature participation in its mighty
-operations is not the concern of the Government.
-
-The municipal lodging-house in Chicago in addition to housing vagrants,
-makes an intelligent effort to put them into regular industry. A
-physician in attendance makes a careful examination of each man who
-comes to the lodging-house, and one winter we tried to see what
-connection could be genuinely established between premature labor and
-worn-out men. It is surprising to find how many of them are tired to
-death of monotonous labor, and begin to tramp in order to get away
-from it--as a business man goes to the woods because he is worn out
-with the stress of business life. This inordinate desire to get away
-from work seems to be connected with the fact that the men started to
-work very early, before they had the physique to stand up to it, or
-the mental vigor with which to overcome its difficulties, or the moral
-stamina which makes a man stick to his work whether he likes it or
-not. But we cannot demand any of these things from the growing boy.
-They are all traits of the adult. A boy is naturally restless, his
-determination easily breaks down, and he runs away. At least this seems
-to be true of many of the men who come to the lodging-house. I recall
-a man who had begun to work in a textile mill quite below the present
-legal age in New England, and who had worked hard for sixteen years.
-He told his tale with all simplicity; and, as he made a motion with
-his hand, he said, “I done that for sixteen years.” I give the words
-as he gave them. “At last I was sick in bed for two or three weeks
-with a fever, and when I crawled out, I made up my mind that I would
-rather go to hell than to go back to that mill.” Whether he considered
-Chicago as equivalent to that, I do not know; but he certainly tramped
-to Chicago, and has been tramping for four years. He does not steal.
-He works in a lumber camp occasionally, and wanders about the rest of
-the time getting odd jobs when he can; but the suggestion of a factory
-throws him into a panic, and causes him quickly to disappear from the
-lodging-house. The physician has made a diagnosis of general debility.
-The man is not fit for steady work. He has been whipped in the battle
-of life, and is spent prematurely because he began prematurely.
-
-Yet the state makes no careful study as to the effect upon children
-of the subdivided labor which many of them perform in factories.
-A child who remains year after year in a spinning room gets no
-instruction--merely a dull distaste for work. Often he cannot stand up
-to the grind of factory life, and he breaks down under it.
-
-What does this mean? That we have no right to increase the list
-of paupers--of those who must be cared for by municipal and State
-agencies because when they were still immature and undeveloped, they
-were subjected to a tremendous pressure. I recall one family of five
-children which, upon the death of the energetic mother who had provided
-for it by means of a little dress-making establishment, was left to the
-care of a feeble old grandmother. The father was a drunkard who had
-never supported his family, and at this time he definitely disappeared.
-The oldest boy was almost twelve years old--a fine, manly little
-fellow, who felt keenly his obligation to care for the family.
-
-We found him a place as cash-boy in a department store for two dollars
-a week. He held it for three years, although his enthusiasm failed
-somewhat as the months went by, and he gradually discovered how little
-help his wages were to the family exchequer after his carfare, decent
-clothes and unending pairs of shoes were paid for. Before the end of
-the third year he had become listless and indifferent to his work, in
-spite of the increase of fifty cents a week. In the hope that a change
-would be good for him, a place as elevator-boy was secured. This
-he was unable to keep, and then one situation after another slipped
-through his grasp, until a typhoid fever which he developed at the age
-of fifteen, seemed to explain his apathy.
-
-After a long illness and a poor recovery, he worked less well.
-Finally, at the age of sixteen, when he should have been able really
-to help the little family and perhaps be its main support, he had
-become a professional tramp, and eventually dropped completely from
-our knowledge. It was through such bitter lessons as these we learned
-that good intentions and the charitable impulse do not always work
-for righteousness; that to force the moral nature of a child and to
-put tasks upon him beyond his normal growth, is quite as cruel and
-disastrous as to expect his undeveloped muscle to lift huge weights.
-
-Adolescence is filled with strange pauses of listlessness and
-dreaminess. At that period the human will is perhaps further away from
-the desire of definite achievement than it ever is again. To work ten
-hours a day for six days in a week in order to buy himself a pair of
-stout boots, that he may be properly shod to go to work some more,
-is the very last thing which really appeals to a boy of thirteen or
-fourteen. If he is forced to such a course too often, his cheated
-nature later re-asserts itself in all sorts of decadent and abnormal
-ways.
-
-An enlightened state would also concern itself with the effect of
-child labor upon the parents. We have in Chicago a great many European
-immigrants, people who have come from country life in Bohemia or the
-south of Italy, hoping that their children will have a better chance
-here than at home. In the old country these immigrants worked on farms
-which provided a very normal activity for a young boy or girl. When
-they come to Chicago, they see no reason why their children should not
-go to work, because they see no difference between the normal activity
-of their own youth and the grinding life, to which they subject their
-children. It is difficult for a man who has grown up in outdoor life
-to adapt himself to the factory. The same experience is found in the
-South with the men who come to the textile towns from the little farms.
-They resent monotonous petty work, and get away from it; they will
-in preference take more poorly paid work, care of horses or janitor
-service--work which has some similarity to that to which they have
-been accustomed. So the parents drop out, and the children, making the
-adaptation, remain, and the curious result ensues of the head of the
-household becoming dependent upon the earnings of the child. You will
-hear a child say, “My mother can’t say nothing to me. I pay the rent;”
-or, “I can do what I please, because I bring home the biggest wages.”
-All this tends to break down the normal relation between parents and
-children. The Italian men who work on the railroads in the summer find
-it a great temptation to settle down in the winter upon the wages
-of their children. A young man from the south of Italy was mourning
-the death of his little girl of twelve; in his grief he said, quite
-simply, “She was my oldest kid. In two years she could have supported
-me, and now I shall have to work five or six years longer until the
-next one can do it.” He expected to retire permanently at thirty-four.
-That breaking down of the normal relation of parent and child, and the
-tendency to demoralize the parent, is something we have no right to
-subject him to. We ought to hold the parent up to the obligation which
-he would have fulfilled had he remained in his early environment.
-
-A modern state might rightly concern itself with the effect of child
-labor upon industry itself. There has been for many years an increasing
-criticism of the modern factory system, not only from the point of view
-of the worker, but from the point of view of the product itself. It
-has been said many times that we can not secure good workmanship nor
-turn out a satisfactory product unless men and women have some sort
-of interest in their work, and some way of expressing that interest
-in relation to it. The system which makes no demand upon originality,
-upon invention, upon self-direction, works automatically, as it were,
-towards an unintelligent producer and towards an uninteresting product.
-This was said at first only by such artists and social reformers as
-Morris and Ruskin; but it is being gradually admitted by men of affairs
-and may at last incorporate itself into actual factory management, in
-which case the factory itself will favor child labor legislation or
-any other measure which increases the free and full development of the
-individual, because he thereby becomes a more valuable producer. We may
-gradually discover that in the interests of this industrial society
-of ours it becomes a distinct loss to put large numbers of producers
-prematurely at work, not only because the community inevitably loses
-their mature working power, but also because their “free labor
-quality,” which is so valuable, is permanently destroyed.
-
-Exercise of the instinct of workmanship not only affords great
-satisfaction to the producer, but also to the consumer, if he be
-possessed of any critical faculty, or have developed genuine powers of
-appreciation. Added to the conscience which protests against the social
-waste of child labor, we have the taste that revolts against a product
-totally without the charm which pleasure in work creates. We may at
-last discover that we are imperiling our civilization at the moment of
-its marked materialism, by wantonly sacrificing to that materialism the
-eternal spirit of youth, the power of variation, which alone is able to
-prevent it from degenerating into a mere mechanism.
-
-It would be easy to produce many illustrations to demonstrate that in
-the leading industrial countries a belief is slowly developing that the
-workman himself is the chief asset, and that the intelligent interest
-of skilled men, the power of self-direction and co-operation which is
-only possible among the free-born and educated, is exactly the only
-thing which will hold out in the markets of the world. As the foremen
-of factories testify again and again, factory discipline is valuable
-only up to a certain point, after which something else must be depended
-on if the best results are to be achieved.
-
-Monopoly of both the raw material and the newly-opened markets is
-certainly a valuable factor in a nation’s industrial prosperity; but
-while we spend blood and treasure to protect one and secure the other,
-we wantonly destroy the most valuable factor of all, intelligent labor.
-Nothing can help us here save the rising tide of humanitarianism, which
-is not only emotional enough to regret the pitiless and stupid waste
-of this power but also intelligent enough to perceive what might be
-accomplished by its utilization.
-
-We are told that the German products hold a foremost place in the
-markets of the world because of Germany’s fine educational system,
-which includes training in trade-schools for so many young men. We
-know, too, that there is at the present moment a strong party in
-Germany opposing militarism, not from the “peace society” point of
-view, but because it withdraws all the young men from the industrial
-life for the best part of three years during which their activity is
-merely disciplinary, with no relation to the industrial life of the
-nation. This anti-military party insists that the loss of the three
-years is a serious matter, and that one nation cannot successfully hold
-its advance position if it must compete with other nations which are
-also establishing trade-schools but which do not thus withdraw their
-youth from continuous training at the period of their greatest docility
-and aptitude.
-
-England is discovering that the cheap markets afforded by semi-savage
-peoples, which she has thrown open to her manufacturers, are now
-reacting in the debasement of her products and her factory workers.
-The manufacturer produces the cheap and inferior articles which he
-imagines the new commerce will demand. The result upon the workers in
-the factories producing these unworthy goods, is that they are robbed
-of the skill which would be demanded if they were ministering to an
-increasing demand of taste and if they were supplying the market of a
-civilized people. It would be a curious result of misapplied energy
-if those very markets which the Briton has so eagerly sought, would
-finally so debase the English producers that all the increased wealth
-the markets have brought to the nation would be consumed in efforts to
-redeem the debased working population.
-
-We have made public education our great concern in America, and perhaps
-the public-school system is our most distinctive achievement; but
-there is a certain lack of consistency in the relation of the State
-to the child after he leaves the public school. At great expense the
-State has provided school buildings and equipment, and other buildings
-in which to prepare professional teachers. It has spared no pains to
-make the system complete, and yet as rapidly as the children leave the
-schoolroom, the State seems to lose all interest and responsibility in
-their welfare and has, until quite recently, turned them over to the
-employer with no restrictions.
-
-At no point does the community say to the employer, We are allowing
-you to profit by the labor of these children whom we have educated at
-great cost, and we demand that they do not work so many hours that they
-shall be exhausted. Nor shall they be allowed to undertake the sort of
-labor which is beyond their strength, nor shall they spend their time
-at work that is absolutely devoid of educational value. The preliminary
-education which they have received in school is but one step in the
-process of making them valuable and normal citizens, and we cannot
-afford to have that intention thwarted, even though the community as
-well as yourself may profit by the business activity which your factory
-affords.
-
-Such a position seems perfectly reasonable, yet the same citizens who
-willingly pay taxes to support an elaborate public-school system,
-strenuously oppose the most moderate attempts to guard the children
-from needless and useless exploitation after they have left school and
-have entered industry.
-
-We are forced to believe that child labor is a national problem, even
-as public education is a national duty. The children of Alabama, Rhode
-Island, and Pennsylvania belong to the nation quite as much as they
-belong to each State, and the nation has an interest in the children
-at least in relation to their industrial efficiency, quite as it has
-an interest in enacting protective tariffs for the preservation of
-American industries.
-
-Uniform compulsory education laws in connection with uniform child
-labor legislation are the important factors in securing educated
-producers for the nation. Fortunately, a new education is arising which
-endeavors to widen and organize the child’s experience with reference
-to the world in which he lives.[13] The new pedagogy holds that it is
-a child’s instinct and pleasure to exercise all his faculties and to
-make discoveries in the world around him. It is the chief business of
-the teacher merely to direct his activity and to feed his insatiable
-curiosity. In order to accomplish this, he is forced to relate the
-child to the surroundings in which he lives; and the most advanced
-schools are, perforce, using modern industry for this purpose. The
-educators have ceased to mourn industrial conditions of the past
-generation, when children were taught agricultural and industrial
-arts by the natural co-operation with their parents, and they are
-endeavoring to supply this inadequacy by manual arts in the school,
-by courses in industrial history, and by miniature reproductions of
-industrial processes, thus constantly coming into better relations with
-the present factory system. These educators recognize the significance
-and power of contemporary industrialism, and hold it an obligation to
-protect children from premature participation in our industrial life,
-only that the children may secure the training and fibre which will
-later make this participation effective, and that their minds may
-finally take possession of the machines which they will guide and feed.
-
-But there is another side to the benefits of child-labor legislation
-represented by the time element, the leisure which is secured to
-the child for the pursuit of his own affairs, quite aside from the
-opportunity afforded him to attend school. Helplessness in childhood,
-the scientists tell us, is the guarantee of adult intellect, but they
-also assert that play in youth is the guarantee of adult culture. It
-is the most valuable instrument the race possesses to keep life from
-becoming mechanical.
-
-The child who cannot live life is prone to dramatize it, and the very
-process is a constant compromise between imitation and imagination, as
-the over-mastering impulse itself which drives him to incessant play is
-both reminiscent and anticipatory. In proportion as the child in later
-life is to be subjected to a mechanical and one-sided activity, and as
-a highly subdivided labor is to be demanded from him, it is therefore
-most important that he should have his full period of childhood and
-youth for this play expression in order that he may cultivate within
-himself the root of a culture which alone can give his later activity a
-meaning.[14] This is true whether or not we accept the theory that the
-aesthetic feelings originate in the play impulse, with its corollary
-that the constant experimentation found in the commonest forms of
-play are to be looked upon as “the principal source of all kinds of
-art.” At this moment, when industrial forces are concentrated and
-unified as never before, unusual care must be taken to secure to the
-children their normal play period, that the art instinct may have some
-chance, and that the producer himself may have enough individuality of
-character to avoid becoming a mere cog in the vast industrial machine.
-
-Quite aside also from the problem of individual development and
-from the fact that play, in which the power of choice is constantly
-presented and constructive imagination required, is the best corrective
-of the future disciplinary life of the factory, there is another reason
-why the children who are to become producers under the present system
-should be given their full child-life period.
-
-The entire population of the factory town and of those enormous
-districts in every large city in which the children live who most need
-the protection of child-labor legislation, consists of people who have
-come together in response to the demands of modern industry. They are
-held together by the purely impersonal tie of working in one large
-factory, in which they not only do not know each other, but in which
-no one person nor even group of persons knows everybody. They are
-utterly without the natural and minute acquaintance and inter-family
-relationships that rural and village life afford, and are therefore
-much more dependent upon the social sympathy and power of effective
-association which is becoming its urban substitute.
-
-This substitute can be most easily elaborated among groups of
-children. Somewhere they must learn to carry on an orderly daily
-life--that life of mutual trust, forbearance, and help which is the
-only real life of civilized man. Play is the great social stimulus,
-and it is the prime motive which unites children and draws them into
-comradeship. A true democratic relation and ease of acquaintance is
-found among the children in a typical factory community because they
-more readily overcome differences of language, tradition, and religion
-than do the adults. “It is in play that nature reveals her anxious
-care to discover men to each other,” and this happy and important
-task, children unconsciously carry forward day by day with all the
-excitement and joy of co-ordinate activity. They accomplish that which
-their elders could not possibly do, and they render a most important
-service to the community. We have not as yet utilized this joy of
-association in relation to the system of factory production which is
-so preëminently one of large bodies of men working together for hours
-at a time. But there is no doubt that it would bring a new power into
-modern industry if the factory could avail itself of that _esprit de
-corps_, that triumphant buoyancy which the child experiences when he
-feels his complete identification with a social group; that sense of
-security which comes upon him sitting in a theatre or “at a party,”
-when he issues forth from himself and is lost in a fairyland which
-has been evoked not only by his own imagination, but by that of his
-companions as well. This power of association, of assimilation, which
-children possess in such a high degree, is easily carried over into
-the affairs of youth if it but be given opportunity and freedom for
-action, as it is in the college life of more favored young people.
-The _esprit de corps_ of an athletic team, that astonishing force
-of co-operation, is, however, never consciously carried over into
-industry, but is persistently disregarded. It is, indeed, lost before
-it is discovered--if I may be permitted an Irish bull--in the case of
-children who are put to work before they have had time to develop the
-power beyond its most childish and haphazard manifestations.
-
-Factory life depends upon groups of people working together, and yet
-it is content with the morphology of the group, as it were, paying
-no attention to its psychology, to the interaction of its members.
-By regarding each producer as a solitary unit, a tremendous power is
-totally unutilized. In the case of children who are prematurely put to
-work under such conditions, an unwarranted nervous strain is added as
-they make their effort to stand up to the individual duties of life
-while still in the stage of group and family dependence.
-
-We naturally associate a factory with orderly productive action; but
-similarity of action, without identical thought and co-operative
-intelligence, is coercion, and not order. The present factory
-discipline needs to be redeemed as the old school discipline has been
-redeemed. In the latter the system of prizes and punishments has been
-largely given up, not only because they were difficult to administer,
-but because they utterly failed to free the powers of the child.
-
-“The fear of starvation,” of which the old economists made so much, is,
-after all, but a poor incentive to work; and the appeal to cupidity
-by which a man is induced to “speed up” in all the various devices of
-piece-work is very little better. Yet the factory still depends upon
-these as incentives to the ordinary workers. Certainly one would wish
-to protect children from them as long as possible. In a soap factory
-in Chicago little girls wrap bars of soap in two covers at the minimum
-rate of 3,000 bars a week; their only ambition is to wrap as fast as
-possible and well enough to pass the foreman’s inspection. The girl
-whose earnings are the largest at the end of the week is filled with
-pride--praiseworthy, certainly, but totally without educational value.
-
-Let us realize before it is too late that in this age of iron, of
-machine-tending, and of subdivided labor, we need as never before
-the untrammeled and inspired activity of youth. To cut it off from
-thousands of working children is a most perilous undertaking, and
-endangers the very industry to which they have been sacrificed.
-
-Only of late years has an effort been made by the city authorities,
-by the municipality itself, to conserve the play instinct and to
-utilize it, if not for the correction of industry, at least for the
-nurture of citizenship. It has been discovered that the city which is
-too careless to provide playgrounds, gymnasiums, and athletic fields
-where the boys legitimately belong and which the policeman is bound to
-respect, simply puts a premium on lawlessness. Without these places
-of their own, groups of boys come to look upon the policeman as an
-enemy, and he regards them as the most lawless of all the citizens.
-This is partly due to the fact that because of our military survivals
-the officer is not brought in contact with the educational forces of
-the city, but only with its vices and crime. He might have quite as
-great an opportunity for influencing the morals of youth as the school
-teacher has. At least one American city spends twenty per cent. more in
-provision for the conviction of youths than for their education, for
-the city which fails to utilize this promising material of youthful
-adventure does not truly get rid of it, and finds it more expensive to
-care for as waste material than as educative material. At a certain
-age a boy is possessed by a restless determination to do something
-dangerous and exciting--a “difficult stunt,” as it were--by which he
-may prove that he is master of his fate and thus express his growing
-self-assertion. He prefers to demonstrate in feats requiring both
-courage and adroitness, and it may be said that tradition is with him
-in his choice. That this impulse is mixed with an absurd desire on the
-part of the boy to “show off,” to impress his companions with the fact
-that he is great and brave and generally to be admired, does not in
-the least affect its genuineness. The city which fails to provide an
-opportunity for this inevitable and normal desire on the part of the
-young citizens makes a grave mistake and invites irregular expression
-of it. The thwarted spirit of adventure finds an outlet in infinite
-varieties of gambling; craps, cards, the tossing of discarded union
-buttons, the betting on odd or even automobile numbers, on the number
-of newspapers under a boy’s arm. Another end which can be accomplished,
-if the city recognizes play as legitimate and provides playgrounds
-and athletic fields, is the development of that self-government and
-self-discipline among groups of boys, which forms the most natural
-basis for democratic political life later.
-
-The boy in a tenement-house region who does not belong to the gang is
-not only an exception, but a very rare exception. This earliest form
-of social life is almost tribal in its organization, and the leader
-too often holds his place because he is a successful bully. The gang
-meets first upon the street, but later it may possess a club room in
-a stable, in a billiard room, in an empty house, under the viaduct,
-in a candy store, in a saloon or even in an empty lot. The spirit of
-association, the fellowship and loyalty which the group inspires,
-carry them into many dangers; but there is no doubt that it is through
-these experiences that the city boy learns his political lessons.
-The training for political life is given in these gangs, and also an
-opportunity to develop that wonderful power of adaptation which is the
-city’s contribution, even to the poorest of her children. A clever
-man once told me that he doubted whether an alderman could be elected
-in a tenement-house district unless he had had gang experience, and
-had become an adept in the interminable discussion which every detail
-of the gang’s activity receives. This alone affords a training in
-democratic government, for it is the prerogative of democracy to invest
-political discussion with the dignity of deeds, and to provide adequate
-motives for discussion. In these social folk-motes, so to speak, the
-young citizen learns to act upon his own determination. The great pity
-is that it so often results in a group morality untouched by a concern
-for the larger morality of the community. Normal groups reacting upon
-each other would tend to an equilibrium of a certain liberty to all,
-but this cannot be accomplished in the life of the street where the
-weaker boy or the weaker gang is continually getting the worst of
-it. And it is only on the protected playground that the gangs can be
-merged into baseball nines and similar organizations, governed by
-well-recognized rules.
-
-We have already democratized education in the interests of the entire
-community; but recreation and constructive play, which afford the best
-soil for establishing genuine and democratic social relations, we have
-left untouched, although they are so valuable in emotional and dynamic
-power. Further than that, the city that refrains from educating the
-play motive is obliged to suppress it. In Chicago gangs of boys between
-fourteen and sixteen years of age, who, possessing work-certificates
-are outside of the jurisdiction of the truant officer, are continually
-being arrested by the police, since they have no orderly opportunity
-for recreation. An enlightened city government would regard these
-groups of boys as the natural soil in which to sow the seeds of
-self-government. As every European city has its parade-ground, where
-the mimics of war are faithfully rehearsed, in order that the country
-may be saved in times of danger, so, if modern government were as
-really concerned in developing its citizens as it is in defending them,
-we would look upon every playing-field as the training-place and
-parade-ground of mature citizenship.
-
-Frederick the Great discovered and applied the use of the rhythmic
-step for the marching of soldiers. For generations men had gone
-forth to war, using martial music as they had used the battle-cry,
-merely to incite their courage and war spirit; but the music had had
-nothing to do with their actual marching. The use of it as a practical
-measure enormously increased the endurance of the soldiers and raised
-the records of forced marches. Industry at the present moment, as
-represented by masses of men in the large factories, is quite as
-chaotic as the early armies were. We have failed to apply our education
-to the real life of the average factory producer. He works without any
-inner coherence or sense of comradeship. Our public education has done
-little as yet to release his powers or to cheer him with the knowledge
-of his significance to the State.
-
-
-FOOTNOTES:
-
-[12] For further analysis of the census figures relating to children,
-consult “Some Ethical Gains Through Legislation.” Mrs. Florence Kelley.
-
-[13] School and Society, by John Dewey.
-
-[14] The Play of Man, Groos, page 394.
-
-
-
-
- CHAPTER VII
-
- UTILIZATION OF WOMEN IN CITY GOVERNMENT
-
-
-We are told many times that the industrial city is a new thing upon the
-face of the earth, and that everywhere its growth has been phenomenal,
-whether we look at Moscow, Berlin, Paris, New York, or Chicago. With or
-without the mediaeval foundation, modern cities are merely resultants
-of the vast crowds of people who have collected at certain points which
-have become manufacturing and distributing centres.
-
-For all political purposes, however, the industrial origin of the city
-is entirely ignored, and political life is organized exclusively in
-relation to its earlier foundations.
-
-As the city itself originated for the common protection of the people
-and was built about a suitable centre of defense which formed a
-citadel, such as the Acropolis at Athens or the Kremlin at Moscow,
-so we can trace the beginning of the municipal franchise to the time
-when the problems of municipal government were still largely those of
-protecting the city against rebellion from within and against invasion
-from without. A voice in city government, as it was extended from the
-nobles, who alone bore arms, was naturally given solely to those who
-were valuable to the military system. There was a certain logic in
-giving the franchise only to grown men when the existence and stability
-of the city depended upon their defence, and when the ultimate value
-of the elector could be reduced to his ability to perform military
-duty. It was fair that only those who were liable to a sudden call to
-arms should be selected to decide as to the relations which the city
-should bear to rival cities, and that the vote for war should be cast
-by the same men who would bear the brunt of battle and the burden of
-protection. We are told by historians that the citizens were first
-called together in those assemblages which were the beginning of
-popular government, only if a war was to be declared or an expedition
-to be undertaken.
-
-But rival cities have long since ceased to settle their claims by force
-of arms, and we shall have to admit, I think, that this early test of
-the elector is no longer fitted to the modern city, whatever may be
-true, in the last analysis, of the basis for the Federal Government.
-
-It has been well said that the modern city is a stronghold of
-industrialism, quite as the feudal city was a stronghold of militarism,
-but the modern city fears no enemies, and rivals from without and
-its problems of government are solely internal. Affairs for the most
-part are going badly in these great new centres in which the quickly
-congregated population has not yet learned to arrange its affairs
-satisfactorily. Insanitary housing, poisonous sewage, contaminated
-water, infant mortality, the spread of contagion, adulterated food,
-impure milk, smoke-laden air, ill-ventilated factories, dangerous
-occupations, juvenile crime, unwholesome crowding, prostitution,
-and drunkenness are the enemies which the modern city must face and
-overcome would it survive. Logically, its electorate should be made up
-of those who can bear a valiant part in this arduous contest, of those
-who in the past have at least attempted to care for children, to clean
-houses, to prepare foods, to isolate the family from moral dangers, of
-those who have traditionally taken care of that side of life which, as
-soon as the population is congested, inevitably becomes the subject of
-municipal consideration and control.
-
-To test the elector’s fitness to deal with this situation by his
-ability to bear arms, is absurd. A city is in many respects a
-great business corporation, but in other respects it is enlarged
-housekeeping. If American cities have failed in the first, partly
-because office holders have carried with them the predatory instinct
-learned in competitive business, and cannot help “working a good thing”
-when they have an opportunity, may we not say that city housekeeping
-has failed partly because women, the traditional housekeepers, have
-not been consulted as to its multiform activities? The men of the city
-have been carelessly indifferent to much of this civic housekeeping, as
-they have always been indifferent to the details of the household. They
-have totally disregarded a candidate’s capacity to keep the streets
-clean, preferring to consider him in relation to the national tariff or
-to the necessity for increasing the national navy, in a pure spirit of
-reversion to the traditional type of government which had to do only
-with enemies and outsiders.
-
-It is difficult to see what military prowess has to do with the
-multiform duties, which, in a modern city, include the care of parks
-and libraries, superintendence of markets, sewers, and bridges,
-the inspection of provisions and boilers, and the proper disposal
-of garbage. Military prowess has nothing to do with the building
-department which the city maintains to see to it that the basements be
-dry, that the bedrooms be large enough to afford the required cubic
-feet of air, that the plumbing be sanitary, that the gas-pipes do not
-leak, that the tenement-house court be large enough to afford light
-and ventilation, and that the stairways be fireproof. The ability to
-carry arms has nothing to do with the health department maintained by
-the city, which provides that children be vaccinated, that contagious
-diseases be isolated and placarded, that the spread of tuberculosis be
-curbed, and that the water be free from typhoid infection. Certainly
-the military conception of society is remote from the functions of the
-school boards, whose concern it is that children be educated, that they
-be supplied with kindergartens and be given a decent place in which to
-play. The very multifariousness and complexity of a city government
-demands the help of minds accustomed to detail and variety of work, to
-a sense of obligation for the health and welfare of young children, and
-to a responsibility for the cleanliness and comfort of others.
-
-Because all these things have traditionally been in the hands of
-women, if they take no part in them now, they are not only missing the
-education which the natural participation in civic life would bring to
-them, but they are losing what they have always had. From the beginning
-of tribal life women have been held responsible for the health of
-the community, a function which is now represented by the health
-department; from the days of the cave dwellers, so far as the home
-was clean and wholesome, it was due to their efforts, which are now
-represented by the bureau of tenement-house inspection; from the period
-of the primitive village, the only public sweeping performed was what
-they undertook in their own dooryards, that which is now represented by
-the bureau of street cleaning. Most of the departments in a modern city
-can be traced to woman’s traditional activity, but in spite of this,
-so soon as these old affairs were turned over to the care of the city,
-they slipped from woman’s hands, apparently because they then became
-matters for collective action and implied the use of the franchise.
-Because the franchise had in the first instance been given to the man
-who could fight, because in the beginning he alone could vote who could
-carry a weapon, the franchise was considered an improper thing for a
-woman to possess.
-
-Is it quite public spirited for women to say, “We will take care of
-these affairs so long as they stay in our own houses, but if they go
-outside and concern so many people that they cannot be carried on
-without the mechanism of the vote, we will drop them. It is true that
-these activities which women have always had, are not at present being
-carried on very well by the men in most of the great American cities,
-but because we do not consider it ‘ladylike’ to vote shall we ignore
-their failure”?
-
-Because women consider the government men’s affair and something
-which concerns itself with elections and alarms, they have become so
-confused in regard to their traditional business in life, the rearing
-of children, that they hear with complacency a statement made by the
-Nestor of sanitary reformers, that one-half of the tiny lives which
-make up the city’s death rate each year might be saved by a more
-thorough application of sanitary science. Because it implies the use of
-the suffrage, they do not consider it women’s business to save these
-lives. Are we going to lose ourselves in the old circle of convention
-and add to that sum of wrong-doing which is continually committed
-in the world because we do not look at things as they really are?
-Old-fashioned ways which no longer apply to changed conditions are a
-snare in which the feet of women have always become readily entangled.
-It is so easy to believe that things that used to exist still go
-on long after they are passed; it is so easy to commit irreparable
-blunders because we fail to correct our theories by our changing
-experience. So many of the stumbling-blocks against which we fall are
-the opportunities to which we have not adjusted ourselves. Because it
-shocks an obsolete ideal, we keep hold of a convention which no longer
-squares with our genuine insight, and we are slow to follow a clue
-which might enable us to solace and improve the life about us.
-
-Why is it that women do not vote upon the matters which concern them
-so intimately? Why do they not follow these vital affairs and feel
-responsible for their proper administration, even though they have
-become municipalized? What would the result have been could women
-have regarded the suffrage, not as a right or a privilege, but as a
-mere piece of governmental machinery without which they could not
-perform their traditional functions under the changed conditions of
-city life? Could we view the whole situation as a matter of obligation
-and of normal development, it would be much simplified. We are at the
-beginning of a prolonged effort to incorporate a progressive developing
-life founded upon a response to the needs of all the people, into the
-requisite legal enactments and civic institutions. To be in any measure
-successful, this effort will require all the intelligent powers of
-observation, all the sympathy, all the common sense which may be gained
-from the whole adult population.
-
-The statement is sometimes made that the franchise for women would be
-valuable only so far as the educated women exercised it. This statement
-totally disregards the fact that those matters in which woman’s
-judgment is most needed are far too primitive and basic to be largely
-influenced by what we call education. The sanitary condition of all
-the factories and workshops, for instance, in which the industrial
-processes are at present carried on in great cities, intimately affect
-the health and lives of thousands of workingwomen.
-
-It is questionable whether women to-day, in spite of the fact that
-there are myriads of them in factories and shops, are doing their
-full share of the world’s work in the lines of production which have
-always been theirs. Even two centuries ago they did practically all
-the spinning, dyeing, weaving, and sewing. They carried on much of the
-brewing and baking and thousands of operations which have been pushed
-out of the domestic system into the factory system. But simply to keep
-on doing the work which their grandmothers did, was to find themselves
-surrounded by conditions over which they have no control.
-
-Sometimes when I see dozens of young girls going into the factories of
-a certain biscuit company on the West Side of Chicago, they appear for
-the moment as a mere cross-section in the long procession of women who
-have furnished the breadstuffs from time immemorial, from the savage
-woman who ground the meal and baked a flat cake, through innumerable
-cottage hearths, kitchens, and bake ovens, to this huge concern in
-which they are still carrying on their traditional business. But always
-before, during the ages of this unending procession, women themselves
-were able to dictate concerning the hours and the immediate conditions
-of their work; even grinding the meal and baking the cake in the ashes
-was diversified by many other activities. But suddenly, since the
-application of steam to the processes of kneading bread and of turning
-the spindle, which really means only a different motor power and not
-in the least an essential change in her work, she has been denied the
-privilege of regulating the conditions which immediately surround her.
-
-In the census of 1900, the section on “Occupations” shows very clearly
-in what direction the employment of women has been tending during the
-last twenty years. Two striking facts stand out vividly: first, the
-increase in the percentage of workingwomen over the percentage of men,
-and second, the large percentage of young women between sixteen and
-twenty years old in the total number of workingwomen as compared with
-the small percentage of young men of the same ages in the total number
-of workingmen. Practically one-half of the workingwomen in the United
-States are girls--young women under the age of twenty-five years. This
-increase in the number of young girls in industry is the more striking
-when taken in connection with the fact that industries of to-day differ
-most markedly from those of the past in the relentless speed which
-they require. This increase in speed is as marked in the depths of
-sweat-shop labor as in the most advanced New England mills, where the
-eight looms operated by each worker have increased to twelve, fourteen,
-and even sixteen looms. This speed, of course, brings a new strain into
-industry and tends inevitably to nervous exhaustion. Machines may be
-revolved more and more swiftly, but the girl workers have no increase
-in vitality responding to the heightened pressure. An ampler and more
-far-reaching protection than now exists, is needed in order to care
-for the health and safety of women in industry. Their youth, their
-helplessness, their increasing numbers, the conditions under which
-they are employed, all call for uniform and enforceable statutes. The
-elaborate regulations of dangerous trades, enacted in England and on
-the Continent for both adults and children, find no parallel in the
-United States. The injurious effects of employments involving the use
-of poisons, acids, gases, atmospheric extremes, or other dangerous
-processes, still await adequate investigation and legislation in this
-country. How shall this take place, save by the concerted efforts of
-the women themselves, those who are employed, and those other women who
-are intelligent as to the worker’s needs and who possess a conscience
-in regard to industrial affairs?
-
-It is legitimate and necessary that women should make a study of
-certain trades and occupations. The production of sweated goods,
-from the human point of view, is not production at all, but waste.
-If the employer takes from the workers week by week more than his
-wages restore to them, he gradually reduces them to the state of
-industrial parasites. The wages of the sweated worker are either being
-supplemented by the wages of relatives and the gifts of charitable
-associations, or else her standard of living is so low that she is
-continually losing her vitality and tending to become a charge upon the
-community in a hospital or a poorhouse.[15]
-
-Yet even the sweat-shops, in which woman carries on her old business
-of making clothing, had to be redeemed, so far as they have been
-redeemed, by the votes of men who passed an anti-sweat-shop law; by
-the city fathers, who, after much pleading, were induced to order
-an inspection of sweat-shops that they might be made to comply with
-sanitary regulations. Women directly controlled the surroundings of
-their work as long as their arrangements were domestic, but they
-cannot do this now unless they have the franchise, as yet the only
-mechanism devised by which a city selects its representative and by
-which a number of persons are able to embody their collective will in
-legislation. For a hundred years England has been legislating upon
-the subject of insanitary workshops, long and exhausting hours of
-work, night work for women, occupations in which pregnant women may
-be employed, and hundreds of other restrictions which we are only
-beginning to consider objects of legislation here.
-
-So far as women have been able, in Chicago at least, to help the
-poorest workers in the sweat-shops, it has been accomplished by women
-organized into trades unions. The organization of Special Order Tailors
-found that it was comparatively simple for an employer to give the
-skilled operatives in a clothing factory more money by taking it away
-from the wages of the seam-sewer and button-holer. The fact that it
-resulted in one set of workers being helped at the expense of another
-set did not appeal to him, so long as he was satisfying the demand of
-the union without increasing the total cost of production. But the
-Special Order Tailors, at the sacrifice of their own wages and growth,
-made a determined effort to include even the sweat-shop workers in the
-benefits they had slowly secured for themselves. By means of the use
-of the label they were finally able to insist that no goods should be
-given out for home-finishing save to women presenting union cards, and
-they raised the wages from nine and eleven cents a dozen for finishing
-garments, to the minimum wage of fifteen cents. They also made a
-protest against the excessive subdivision of the labor upon garments, a
-practice which enables the manufacturer to use children and the least
-skilled adults. Thirty-two persons are commonly employed upon a single
-coat, and it is the purpose of the Special Order Tailors to have all
-the machine work performed by one worker, thus reducing the number
-working on one coat to twelve or fourteen. As this change will at the
-same time demand more skill on the part of the operator, and will
-increase the variety and interest in his work, these garment-makers
-are sacrificing both time and money for the defence of Ruskinian
-principles--one of the few actual attempts to recover the “joy of
-work.” Although the attempt was, of course, mixed with a desire to
-preserve a trade from the invasion of the unskilled, and a consequent
-lowering of wages, it also represented a genuine effort to preserve to
-the poorest worker some interest and value in the work itself. It is
-most unfair, however, to put this task upon the trades unionists and to
-so confuse it with their other efforts that it, too, becomes a cause
-of warfare. The poorest women are often but uncomprehending victims of
-this labor movement of which they understand so little, and which has
-become so much a matter of battle that helpless individuals are lost in
-the conflict.
-
-A complicated situation occurs to me in illustration. A woman from
-the Hull-House Day Nursery came to me two years ago asking to borrow
-twenty-five dollars, a sum her union had imposed as a fine. She gave
-such an incoherent account of her plight that it was evident that
-she did not in the least understand what it was all about. A little
-investigation disclosed the following facts: The “Nursery Mother,”
-as I here call her for purposes of identification, had worked for a
-long time in an unorganized overall factory, where the proprietor,
-dealing as he did in goods purchased exclusively by workingmen, found
-it increasingly difficult to sell his overalls because they did not
-bear the union label. He finally made a request to the union that the
-employees in his factory be organized. This was done, he was given the
-use of the label, and upon this basis he prospered for several months.
-
-Whether the organizer was “fixed” or not, the investigation did
-not make clear; for, although the “Nursery Mother,” with her
-fellow-workers, had paid their union dues regularly, the employer was
-not compelled to pay the union scale of wages, but continued to pay
-the same wages as before. At the end of three months his employees
-discovered that they were not being paid the union scale, and demanded
-that their wages be raised to that amount. The employer, in the
-meantime having extensively advertised his use of the label, concluded
-that his purpose had been served, and that he no longer needed the
-union. He refused, therefore, to pay the union scale, and a strike
-ensued. The “Nursery Mother” went out with the rest, and within a few
-days found work in another shop, a union shop doing a lower grade of
-manufacturing. At that time there was no uniform scale in the garment
-trades, and although a trade unionist working for union wages, she
-received lower wages than she had under the non-union conditions in
-the overall factory. She was naturally much confused and, following
-her instinct to get the best wages possible, she went back to her
-old place. Affairs ran smoothly for a few weeks, until the employer
-discovered that he was again losing trade because his goods lacked
-the label, whereupon he once more applied to have his shop unionized.
-The organizer, coming back, promptly discovered the recreant “Nursery
-Mother,” and, much to her bewilderment, she was fined twenty-five
-dollars. She understood nothing clearly, nor could she, indeed, be made
-to understand so long as she was in the midst of this petty warfare.
-Her labor was a mere method of earning money quite detached from her
-European experience, and failed to make for her the remotest connection
-with the community whose genuine needs she was supplying. No effort
-had been made to show her the cultural aspect of her work, to give her
-even the feeblest understanding of the fact that she was supplying a
-genuine need of the community, and that she was entitled to respect
-and a legitimate industrial position. It would have been necessary to
-make such an effort from the historic standpoint, and this could be
-undertaken only by the community as a whole and not by any one class in
-it. Protective legislation would be but the first step toward making
-her a more valuable producer and a more intelligent citizen. The whole
-effort would imply a closer connection between industry and government,
-and could be accomplished intelligently only if women were permitted to
-exercise the franchise.
-
-A certain healing and correction would doubtless ensue could we but
-secure for the protection and education of industrial workers that
-nurture of health and morals which women have so long reserved for
-their own families and which has never been utilized as a directing
-force in industrial affairs.
-
-When the family constituted the industrial organism of the day, the
-daughters of the household were carefully taught in reference to the
-place they would take in that organism, but as the household arts have
-gone outside the home, almost nothing has been done to connect the
-young women with the present great industrial system. This neglect has
-been equally true in regard to the technical and cultural sides of that
-system.
-
-The failure to fit the education of women to the actual industrial
-life which is carried on about them has had disastrous results in two
-directions. First, industry itself has lacked the modification which
-women might have brought to it had they committed the entire movement
-to that growing concern for a larger and more satisfying life for each
-member of the community, a concern which we have come to regard as
-legitimate. Second, the more prosperous women would have been able to
-understand and adjust their own difficulties of household management in
-relation to the producer of factory products, as they are now utterly
-unable to do.
-
-As the census of 1900 showed that more than half of the women
-employed in “gainful occupations” in the United States are engaged
-in households, certainly their conditions of labor lie largely in
-the hands of women employers. At a conference held at Lake Placid by
-employers of household labor, it was contended that future historical
-review may show that the girls who are to-day in domestic service
-are the really progressive women of the age; that they are those
-who are fighting conditions which limit their freedom, and although
-they are doing it blindly, at least they are demanding avenues of
-self-expression outside their work; and that this struggle from
-conditions detrimental to their highest life is the ever-recurring
-story of the emancipation of first one class and then another. It was
-further contended that in this effort to become sufficiently educated
-to be able to understand the needs of an educated employer from an
-independent standpoint, they are really doing the community a great
-service, and did they but receive co-operation instead of opposition,
-domestic service would lose its social ostracism and attract a more
-intelligent class of women. And yet this effort, perfectly reasonable
-from the standpoint of historic development and democratic tradition,
-receives little help from the employing housekeepers, because they know
-nothing of industrial development.
-
-The situation could be understood only by viewing it, first, in the
-relation to recent immigration and, second, in connection with the
-factory system at the present stage of development in America. A review
-of the history of domestic service in a fairly prosperous American
-family begins with the colonial period, when the daughters of the
-neighboring farmers came in to “help” during the busy season. This was
-followed by the Irish immigrant, when almost every kitchen had its Nora
-or Bridget, while the mistress of the household retained the sweeping
-and dusting and the Saturday baking. Then came the halcyon days of
-German “second girls” and cooks, followed by the Swedes. The successive
-waves of immigration supply the demand for domestic service, gradually
-obliterating the fact that as the women became more familiar with
-American customs, they as well as their men folk, entered into more
-skilled and lucrative positions.
-
-In these last years immigration consists in ever-increasing numbers
-of South Italians and of Russian, Polish, and Rumanian Jews, none of
-whom have to any appreciable extent entered into domestic service. The
-Italian girls are married between the ages of fifteen and eighteen, and
-to live in any house in town other than that of her father seems to an
-Italian girl quite incomprehensible. The strength of the family tie,
-the need for “kosher” foods, the celebration of religious festivities,
-the readiness with which she takes up the sewing trades in which her
-father and brother are already largely engaged, makes domestic service
-a rare occupation for the daughters of the recent Jewish immigrants.
-Moreover, these two classes of immigrants have been quickly absorbed,
-as, indeed, all working people are, by the increasing demand for the
-labor of young girls and children in factory and workshops. The paucity
-of the material for domestic service is therefore revealed at last, and
-we are obliged to consider the material for domestic service which a
-democracy supplies, and also to realize that the administration of the
-household has suffered because it has become unnaturally isolated from
-the rest of the community.
-
-The problems of food and shelter for the family, at any given
-moment, must be considered in relation to all the other mechanical
-and industrial life of that moment, quite as the intellectual life
-of the family finally depends for its vitality upon its relation to
-the intellectual resources of the rest of the community. When the
-administrator of the household deliberately refuses to avail herself
-of the wonderful inventions going on all about her, she soon comes
-to the point of priding herself upon the fact that her household is
-administered according to traditional lines and of believing that the
-moral life of the family is so enwrapped in these old customs as to
-be endangered by any radical change. Because of this attitude on the
-part of contemporary housekeepers, the household has firmly withstood
-the beneficent changes and healing innovations which applied science
-and economics would long ago have brought about could they have worked
-naturally and unimpeded.
-
-These moral and economic difficulties, whether connected with the
-isolation of the home or with the partial and unsatisfactory efforts
-of trades unions, could be avoided only if society would frankly
-recognize the industrial situation as that which concerns us all,
-and would seriously prepare all classes of the community for their
-relation to the situation. A technical preparation would, of course,
-not be feasible, but a cultural one would be possible, so that all
-parts of the community might be intelligent in regard to the industrial
-developments and transitions going on about them. If American women
-could but obtain a liberating knowledge of that history of industry
-and commerce which is so similar in every country of the globe, the
-fact that so much factory labor is performed by immigrants would
-help to bring them nearer to the immigrant woman. Equipped with “the
-informing mind” on the one hand and with experience on the other, we
-could then walk together through the marvelous streets of the human
-city, no longer conscious whether we are natives or aliens, because
-we have become absorbed in a fraternal relation arising from a common
-experience.
-
-And this attitude of understanding and respect for the worker is
-necessary, not only to appreciate what he produces, but to preserve
-his power of production, again showing the necessity for making that
-substitute for war--human labor--more aggressive and democratic. We
-are told that the conquered races everywhere, in their helplessness,
-are giving up the genuine practise of their own arts. In India, for
-instance, where their arts have been the blossom of many years of
-labor, the conquered races are casting them aside as of no value in
-order that they may conform to the inferior art, or rather, lack of
-art, of their conquerors. Morris constantly lamented that in some parts
-of India the native arts were quite destroyed, and in many others
-nearly so; that in all parts they had more or less begun to sicken.
-This lack of respect and understanding of the primitive arts found
-among colonies of immigrants in a modern cosmopolitan city, produces
-a like result in that the arts languish and disappear. We have made
-an effort at Hull-House to recover something of the early industries
-from an immigrant neighborhood, and in a little exhibit called a
-labor museum, we have placed in historic sequence and order methods
-of spinning and weaving from a dozen nationalities in Asia Minor and
-Europe. The result has been a striking exhibition of the unity and
-similarity of the earlier industrial processes. Within the narrow
-confines of one room, the Syrian, the Greek, the Italian, the Russian,
-the Norwegian, the Dutch, and the Irish find that the differences in
-their spinning have been merely putting the distaff upon a frame or
-placing the old hand-spindle in a horizontal position. A group of women
-representing vast differences in religion, in language, in tradition,
-and in nationality, exhibit practically no difference in the daily
-arts by which, for a thousand generations, they have clothed their
-families. When American women come to visit them, the quickest method,
-in fact almost the only one, of establishing a genuine companionship
-with them, is through this same industry, unless we except that
-still older occupation, the care of little children. Perhaps this
-experiment may claim to have made a genuine effort to find the basic
-experiences upon which a cosmopolitan community may unite at least on
-the industrial side. The recent date of the industrial revolution and
-our nearness to a primitive industry are shown by the fact that Italian
-mothers are more willing to have their daughters work in factories
-producing textile and food stuffs than in those which produce wood and
-metal. They interpret the entire situation so simply that it appears
-to them just what it is--a mere continuation of woman’s traditional
-work under changed conditions. Another example of our nearness to early
-methods is shown by the fact that many women from South Italy and from
-the remoter parts of Russia have never seen a spinning-wheel, and
-look upon it as a new and marvelous invention. But these very people,
-who are habitually at such a disadvantage because they lack certain
-superficial qualities which are too highly prized, have an opportunity
-in the labor museum, at least for the moment, to assert a position in
-the community to which their previous life and training entitles them,
-and they are judged with something of a historic background. Their very
-apparent remoteness gives industrial processes a picturesque content
-and charm.
-
-Can we learn our first lesson in modern industry from these humble
-peasant women who have never shirked the primitive labors upon which
-all civilized life is founded, even as we must obtain our first
-lessons in social morality from those who are bearing the brunt of
-the overcrowded and cosmopolitan city which is the direct result of
-modern industrial conditions? If we contend that the franchise should
-be extended to women on the ground that less emphasis is continually
-placed upon the military order and more upon the industrial order of
-society, we should have to insist that, if she would secure her old
-place in industry, the modern woman must needs fit her labors to the
-present industrial organization as the simpler woman fitted hers to the
-more simple industrial order. It has been pointed out that woman lost
-her earlier place when man usurped the industrial pursuits and created
-wealth on a scale unknown before. Since that time women have been
-reduced more and more to a state of dependency, until we see only among
-the European peasant women as they work in the fields, “the heavy,
-strong, enduring, patient, economically functional representative of
-what the women of our day used to be.”
-
-Cultural education as it is at present carried on in the most advanced
-schools, is to some extent correcting the present detached relation
-of women to industry but a sense of responsibility in relation to the
-development of industry would accomplish much more. As men earned
-their citizenship through their readiness and ability to defend their
-city, so perhaps woman, if she takes a citizen’s place in the modern
-industrial city, will have to earn it by devotion and self-abnegation
-in the service of its complex needs.
-
-The old social problems were too often made a cause of war in the
-belief that all difficulties could be settled by an appeal to arms. But
-certainly these subtler problems which confront the modern cosmopolitan
-city, the problems of race antagonisms and economic adjustments, must
-be settled by a more searching and genuine method than mere prowess
-can possibly afford. The first step toward their real solution must
-be made upon a past experience common to the citizens as a whole and
-connected with their daily living. As moral problems become more and
-more associated with our civic and industrial organizations, the
-demand for enlarged activity is more exigent. If one could connect the
-old maternal anxieties, which are really the basis of family and tribal
-life, with the candidates who are seeking offices, it would never be
-necessary to look about for other motive powers, and if to this we
-could add maternal concern for the safety and defence of the industrial
-worker, we should have an increasing code of protective legislation.
-
-We certainly may hope for two results if women enter formally into
-municipal life. First, the opportunity to fulfill their old duties and
-obligations with the safeguard and the consideration which the ballot
-alone can secure for them under the changed conditions, and, second,
-the education which participation in actual affairs always brings.
-As we believe that woman has no right to allow what really belongs
-to her to drop away from her, so we contend that ability to perform
-an obligation comes very largely in proportion as that obligation is
-conscientiously assumed.
-
-Out of the mediaeval city founded upon militarism there arose in the
-thirteenth century a new order, the middle class, whose importance
-rested, not upon birth or arms, but upon wealth, intelligence, and
-organization. This middle class achieved a sterling success in the
-succeeding six centuries of industrialism because it was essential to
-the existence and development of the industrial era. Perhaps we can
-forecast the career of woman, the citizen, if she is permitted to bear
-an elector’s part in the coming period of humanitarianism in which
-government must concern itself with human welfare. She will bear her
-share of civic responsibility because she is essential to the normal
-development of the city of the future, and because the definition
-of the loyal citizen as one who is ready to shed his blood for his
-country, has become inadequate and obsolete.
-
-
-FOOTNOTES:
-
-[15] A Case for the Factory Acts. Mrs. Sidney Webb.
-
-
-
-
- CHAPTER VIII
-
- PASSING OF THE WAR VIRTUES
-
-
-Of all the winged words which Tolstoy wrote during the war between
-Russia and Japan, perhaps none are more significant than these:
-“The great strife of our time is not that now taking place between
-the Japanese and the Russians, nor that which may blaze up between
-the white and the yellow races, nor that strife which is carried
-on by mines, bombs, and bullets, but that spiritual strife which,
-without ceasing, has gone on and is going on between the enlightened
-consciousness of mankind now awaiting for manifestation and that
-darkness and that burden which surrounds and oppresses mankind.” In
-the curious period of accommodation in which we live, it is possible
-for old habits and new compunctions to be equally powerful, and it is
-almost a matter of pride with us that we neither break with the old nor
-yield to the new. We call this attitude tolerance, whereas it is often
-mere confusion of mind. Such mental confusion is strikingly illustrated
-by our tendency to substitute a statement of the historic evolution of
-an ideal of conduct in place of the ideal itself. This almost always
-occurs when the ideal no longer accords with our faithful experience
-of life and when its implications are not justified by our latest
-information. In this way we spare ourselves the necessity of pressing
-forward to newer ideals of conduct.
-
-We quote the convictions and achievements of the past as an excuse for
-ourselves when we lack the energy either to throw off old moral codes
-which have become burdens or to attain a morality proportionate to our
-present sphere of activity.
-
-At the present moment the war spirit attempts to justify its noisy
-demonstrations by quoting its great achievements in the past and by
-drawing attention to the courageous life which it has evoked and
-fostered. It is, however, perhaps significant that the adherents of war
-are more and more justifying it by its past record and reminding us of
-its ancient origin. They tell us that it is interwoven with every fibre
-of human growth and is at the root of all that is noble and courageous
-in human life, that struggle is the basis of all progress, that it is
-now extended from individuals and tribes to nations and races.
-
-We may admire much that is admirable in this past life of courageous
-warfare, while at the same time we accord it no right to dominate
-the present, which has traveled out of its reach into a land of new
-desires. We may admit that the experiences of war have equipped the men
-of the present with pluck and energy, but to insist upon the selfsame
-expression for that pluck and energy would be as stupid a mistake as if
-we would relegate the full-grown citizen, responding to many claims and
-demands upon his powers, to the school-yard fights of his boyhood, or
-to the college contests of his cruder youth. The little lad who stoutly
-defends himself on the school-ground may be worthy of much admiration,
-but if we find him, a dozen years later, the bullying leader of a
-street-gang who bases his prestige on the fact that “no one can whip
-him,” our admiration cools amazingly, and we say that the carrying over
-of those puerile instincts into manhood shows arrested development
-which is mainly responsible for filling our prisons.
-
-This confusion between the contemporaneous stage of development and the
-historic rôle of certain qualities, is intensified by our custom of
-referring to social evolution as if it were a force and not a process.
-We assume that social ends may be obtained without the application of
-social energies, although we know in our hearts that the best results
-of civilization have come about only through human will and effort.
-To point to the achievement of the past as a guarantee for continuing
-what has since become shocking to us is stupid business; it is to
-forget that progress itself depends upon adaptation, upon a nice
-balance between continuity and change. Let us by all means acknowledge
-and preserve that which has been good in warfare and in the spirit of
-warfare; let us gather it together and incorporate it in our national
-fibre. Let us, however, not be guilty for a moment of shutting our
-eyes to that which for many centuries must have been disquieting to
-the moral sense, but which is gradually becoming impossible, not only
-because of our increasing sensibilities, but because great constructive
-plans and humanized interests have captured our hopes and we are
-finding that war is an implement too clumsy and barbaric to subserve
-our purpose. We have come to realize that the great task of pushing
-forward social justice could be enormously accelerated if primitive
-methods as well as primitive weapons were once for all abolished.
-
-The past may have been involved in war and suffering in order to bring
-forth a new and beneficent courage, an invincible ardor for conserving
-and healing human life, for understanding and elaborating it. To obtain
-this courage is to distinguish between a social order founded upon
-law enforced by authority and that other social order which includes
-liberty of individual action and complexity of group development. The
-latter social order would not suppress the least germ of promise, of
-growth and variety, but would nurture all into a full and varied life.
-It is not an easy undertaking to obtain it and it cannot be carried
-forward without conscious and well-defined effort. The task that is
-really before us is first to see to it, that the old virtues bequeathed
-by war are not retained after they have become a social deterrent and
-that social progress is not checked by a certain contempt for human
-nature which is but the inherited result of conquest. Second, we must
-act upon the assumption that spontaneous and fraternal action as virile
-and widespread as war itself is the only method by which substitutes
-for the war virtues may be discovered.
-
-It was contended in the first chapter of this book that social morality
-is developed through sentiment and action. In this particular age we
-can live the truth which has been apprehended by our contemporaries,
-that truth which is especially our own, only by establishing nobler and
-wiser social relations and by discovering social bonds better fitted
-to our requirements. Warfare in the past has done much to bring men
-together. A sense of common danger and the stirring appeal to action
-for a common purpose, easily open the channels of sympathy through
-which we partake of the life about us. But there are certainly other
-methods of opening those channels. A social life to be healthy must be
-consciously and fully adjusted to the march of social needs, and as we
-may easily make a mistake by forgetting that enlarged opportunities are
-ever demanding an enlarged morality, so we will fail in the task of
-substitution if we do not demand social sympathy in a larger measure
-and of a quality better adapted to the contemporaneous situation.
-
-Perhaps the one point at which this undertaking is most needed is in
-regard to our conception of patriotism, which, although as genuine
-as ever before, is too much dressed in the trappings of the past and
-continually carries us back to its beginnings in military prowess and
-defence. To have been able to trace the origin and development of
-patriotism and then to rest content with that, and to fail to insist
-that it shall respond to the stimulus of a larger and more varied
-environment with which we are now confronted, is a confession of
-weakness; it exhibits lack of moral enterprise and of national vigor.
-
-We have all seen the breakdown of village standards of morality when
-the conditions of a great city are encountered. To do “the good lying
-next at hand” may be a sufficient formula when the village idler
-and his needy children live but a few doors down the street, but
-the same dictum may be totally misleading when the villager becomes
-a city resident and finds his next-door neighbors prosperous and
-comfortable, while the poor and overburdened live many blocks away
-where he would never see them at all, unless he were stirred by a
-spirit of social enterprise to go forth and find them in the midst
-of their meagre living and their larger needs. The spirit of village
-gossip, penetrating and keen as it is, may be depended upon to bring to
-the notice of the kind-hearted villager all cases of suffering--that
-someone is needed “to sit up all night” with a sick neighbor, or that
-the village loafer has been drunk again and beaten his wife; but in
-a city divided so curiously into the regions of the well-to-do and
-the congested quarters of the immigrant, the conscientious person
-can no longer rely upon gossip. There is no intercourse, not even a
-scattered one, between the two, save what the daily paper brings, with
-its invincible propensity to report the gossip of poverty and crime,
-perhaps a healthier tendency than we imagine. The man who has moved
-from the village to the cosmopolitan city and who would continue even
-his former share of beneficent activity must bestir himself to keep
-informed as to social needs and to make new channels through which his
-sympathy may flow. Without some such conscious effort, his sympathy
-will finally become stratified along the line of his social intercourse
-and he will be unable really to care for any people but his “own kind.”
-American conceptions of patriotism have moved, so to speak, from the
-New England village into huge cosmopolitan cities. They find themselves
-bewildered by the change and have not only failed to make the
-adjustment, but the very effort in that direction is looked upon with
-deep suspicion by their old village neighbors. Unless our conception of
-patriotism is progressive, it cannot hope to embody the real affection
-and the real interest of the nation. We know full well that the
-patriotism of common descent is the mere patriotism of the clan--the
-early patriotism of the tribe--and that, while the possession of a
-like territory is an advance upon that first conception, both of them
-are unworthy to be the patriotism of a great cosmopolitan nation. We
-shall not have made any genuine advance until we have grown impatient
-of a patriotism founded upon military prowess and defence, because this
-really gets in the way and prevents the growth of that beneficent and
-progressive patriotism which we need for the understanding and healing
-of our current national difficulties.
-
-To seek our patriotism in some age other than our own is to accept a
-code that is totally inadequate to help us through the problems which
-current life develops. We continue to found our patriotism upon war
-and to contrast conquest with nurture, militarism with industrialism,
-calling the latter passive and inert and the former active and
-aggressive, without really facing the situation as it exists. We
-tremble before our own convictions, and are afraid to find newer
-manifestations of courage and daring lest we thereby lose the virtues
-bequeathed to us by war. It is a pitiful acknowledgment that we have
-lost them already and that we shall have to give up the ways of war, if
-for no other reason than to preserve the finer spirit of courage and
-detachment which it has engendered and developed.
-
-We come at last to the practical question as to how these substitutes
-for the war virtues may be found. How may we, the children of an
-industrial and commercial age, find the courage and sacrifice which
-belong to our industrialism. We may begin with August Comte’s assertion
-that man seeks to improve his position in two different ways, by
-the destruction of obstacles and by the construction of means, or,
-designated by their most obvious social results, if his contention is
-correct, by military action and by industrial action, and that the two
-must long continue side by side. Then we find ourselves asking what
-may be done to make more picturesque those lives which are spent in a
-monotonous and wearing toil, compared to which the camp is exciting and
-the barracks comfortable. How shall it be made to seem as magnificent
-patiently to correct the wrongs of industrialism as to do battle for
-the rights of the nation? This transition ought not to be so difficult
-in America, for to begin with, our national life in America has been
-largely founded upon our success in invention and engineering, in
-manufacturing and commerce. Our prosperity has rested upon constructive
-labor and material progress, both of them in striking contrast to
-warfare. There is an element of almost grim humor in the nation’s
-reverting at last to the outworn methods of battle-ships and defended
-harbors. We may admit that idle men need war to keep alive their
-courage and endurance, but we have few idle men in a nation engaged
-in industrialism. We constantly see subordination of sensation to
-sentiment in hundreds of careers which are not military; the thousands
-of miners in Pennsylvania doubtless endure every year more bodily pain
-and peril than the same number of men in European barracks.
-
-Industrial life affords ample opportunity for endurance, discipline,
-and a sense of detachment, if the struggle is really put upon the
-highest level of industrial efficiency. But because our industrial life
-is not on this level, we constantly tend to drop the newer and less
-developed ideals for the older ones of warfare, we ignore the fact that
-war so readily throws back the ideals which the young are nourishing
-into the mold of those which the old should be outgrowing. It lures
-young men not to develop, but to exploit; it turns them from the
-courage and toil of industry to the bravery and endurance of war, and
-leads them to forget that civilization is the substitution of law for
-war. It incites their ambitions, not to irrigate, to make fertile and
-sanitary, the barren plain of the savage, but to fill it with military
-posts and tax-gatherers, to cease from pushing forward industrial
-action into new fields and to fall back upon military action.
-
-We may illustrate this by the most beneficent acts of war, when
-the military spirit claiming to carry forward civilization invades
-a country for the purpose of bringing it into the zone of the
-civilized world. Militarism enforces law and order and insists upon
-obedience and discipline, assuming that it will ultimately establish
-righteousness and foster progress. In order to carry out this good
-intention, it first of all clears the decks of impedimenta, although
-in the process it may extinguish the most precious beginnings of
-self-government and the nucleus of self-help, which the wise of the
-native community have long been anxiously hoarding.
-
-It is the military idea, resting content as it does with the passive
-results of order and discipline, which confesses a totally inadequate
-conception of the value and power of human life. The charge of
-obtaining negative results could with great candor be brought against
-militarism, while the strenuous task, the vigorous and difficult
-undertaking, involving the use of the most highly developed human
-powers, can be claimed for industrialism.
-
-It is really human constructive labor which must give the newly invaded
-country a sense of its place in the life of the civilized world, some
-idea of the effective occupations which it may perform. In order to
-accomplish this its energy must be freed and its resources developed.
-Militarism undertakes to set in order, to suppress and to govern, if
-necessary to destroy, while industrialism undertakes to liberate latent
-forces, to reconcile them to new conditions, to demonstrate that their
-aroused activities can no longer follow caprice, but must fit into a
-larger order of life. To call this latter undertaking, demanding ever
-new powers of insight, patience, and fortitude, less difficult, less
-manly, less strenuous, than the first, is on the face of it absurd.
-It is the soldier who is inadequate to the difficult task, who strews
-his ways with blunders and lost opportunities, who cannot justify his
-vocation by the results, and who is obliged to plead guilty to a lack
-of rational method.
-
-Of British government in the Empire, an Englishman has recently
-written, “We are obliged in practise to make a choice between good
-order and justice administered autocratically in accordance with
-British standards on the one hand, and delicate, costly, doubtful,
-and disorderly experiments in self-government on British lines upon
-the other, and we have practically everywhere decided upon the former
-alternative. It is, of course, less difficult.”[16] Had our American
-ideals of patriotism and morality in international relations kept
-pace with our experience, had we followed up our wide commercial
-relations with an adequate ethical code, we can imagine a body of
-young Americans, “the flower of our youth,” as we like to say,
-proudly declining commercial advantages founded upon forced military
-occupation and informing their well-meaning government that they
-declined to accept openings on any such terms as these, that their
-ideals of patriotism and of genuine government demanded the play of
-their moral prowess and their constructive intelligence. Certainly in
-America we have a chance to employ something more active and virile,
-more inventive, more in line with our temperament and tradition, than
-the mere desire to increase commercial relations by armed occupation
-as other governments have done. A different conduct is required
-from a democracy than from the mere order-keeping, bridge-building,
-tax-gathering Roman, or from the conscientious Briton carrying the
-blessings of an established government and enlarged commerce to all
-quarters of the globe.
-
-It has been the time-honored custom to attribute unjust wars to the
-selfish ambition of rulers who remorselessly sacrifice their subjects
-to satisfy their greed. But, as Lecky has recently pointed out, it
-remains to be seen whether or not democratic rule will diminish war.
-Immoderate and uncontrolled desires are at the root of most national
-as well as of most individual crimes, and a large number of persons
-may be moved by unworthy ambitions quite as easily as a few. If the
-electorate of a democracy accustom themselves to take the commercial
-view of life, to consider the extension of trade as the test of a
-national prosperity, it becomes comparatively easy for mere extension
-of commercial opportunity to assume a moral aspect and to receive the
-moral sanction. Unrestricted commercialism is an excellent preparation
-for governmental aggression. The nation which is accustomed to condone
-the questionable business methods of a rich man because of his success,
-will find no difficulty in obscuring the moral issues involved in any
-undertaking that is successful. It becomes easy to deny the moral basis
-of self-government and to substitute militarism. The soldier formerly
-looked down upon the merchant whom he now obeys, as he still looks down
-upon the laborer as a man who is engaged in a business inferior to
-his own, as someone who is dull and passive and ineffective. When our
-public education succeeds in freeing the creative energy and developing
-the skill which the advance of industry demands, this attitude must
-disappear, and a spectacle such as that recently seen in London among
-the idle men returned from service in South Africa, who refused to work
-through a contemptuous attitude towards the “slow life” of the laborer,
-will become impossible. We have as yet failed to uncover the relative
-difficulty and requisite training for the two methods of life.
-
-It is difficult to illustrate on a national scale the substitution of
-the ideals of labor for those of warfare.
-
-At the risk of being absurd, and with the certainty of pushing an
-illustration beyond its legitimate limits, I am venturing to typify
-this substitution by the one man whom the civilized world has most
-closely associated with military ideals, the present Emperor of
-Germany. We may certainly believe that the German Emperor is a
-conscientious man, who means to do his duty to all his subjects; that
-he regards himself, not only as general and chief of the army, but also
-as the fostering father of the humble people. Let us imagine the quite
-impossible thing that for ten years he does not review any troops, does
-not attend any parades, does not wear a uniform, nor hear the clang of
-the sword as he walks, but that during these ten years he lives with
-the peasants “who drive the painful plow,” that he constantly converses
-with them, and subjects himself to their alternating hopes and fears
-as to the result of the harvest, at best so inadequate for supplying
-their wants and for paying their taxes. Let us imagine that the German
-Emperor during these halcyon years, in addition to the companionship
-of the humble, reads only the folk-lore, the minor poetry and the
-plaintive songs in which German literature is so rich, until he comes
-to see each man of the field as he daily goes forth to his toil “with a
-soldier tied to his back,” exhausted by the double strain of his burden
-and his work.
-
-Let us imagine this Emperor going through some such profound moral
-change as befell Count Tolstoy when he quitted his military service
-in the Caucasus and lived with the peasants on his estate, with this
-difference that, instead of feeling directly responsible for a village
-of humble folk, he should come to feel responsible for all the toilers
-of the “Fatherland” and for the international results of the German
-army. Let us imagine that in his self-surrender to the humblest of his
-people, there would gradually grow up in his subconsciousness, forces
-more ideal than any which had possessed him before; that his interests
-and thoughts would gradually shift from war and the manœuvres and
-extensions of the army, to the unceasing toil, the permanent patience,
-which lie at the bottom of all national existence; that the life of
-the common people, which is so infinite in its moral suggestiveness,
-would open up to him new moral regions, would stir new energies within
-him, until there would take place one of those strange alterations in
-personality of which hundreds of examples are recorded. Under a glow
-of generous indignation, magnanimity, loyalty to his people, a passion
-of self-surrender to his new ideals, we can imagine that the imperial
-temperament would waste no time in pinings and regret, but that, his
-energies being enlisted in an overmastering desire to free the people
-from the burden of the army, he would drive vigorously in the direction
-of his new ideals. It is impossible to imagine him “passive” under this
-conversion to the newer ideals of peace. He would no more be passive
-than St. Paul was after his conversion. He would regard the four
-million men in Europe shut up in barracks, fed in idleness by toiling
-peasants, as an actual wrong and oppression. They would all have to
-be freed and returned to normal life and occupation--not through the
-comparatively easy method of storming garrisons, in which he has had
-training, but through conviction on the part of rulers and people of
-the wrong and folly of barrack idleness and military glitter. The
-freeing of the Christians from the oppressions of the Turks, of the
-Spaniards from the Moslems, could offer no more strenuous task--always,
-however, with the added difficulty and complication that the change
-in the people must be a moral change analogous to the one which had
-already taken place within himself; that he must be debarred from
-the use of weapons, to which his earlier life had made him familiar;
-that his high task, while enormous in its proportion, was still most
-delicate in its character, and must be undertaken without the guarantee
-of precedent, and without any surety of success. “Smitten with the
-great vision of social righteousness,” as so many of his contemporaries
-have been, he could not permit himself to be blinded or to take refuge
-in glittering generalities, but, even as St. Paul arose from his vision
-and went on his way in a new determination never again changed, so he
-would have to go forth to a mission, imperial indeed in its magnitude,
-but “over-imperial” in the sweep of its consequences and in the
-difficulty of its accomplishment.
-
-Certainly counting all the hours of the Emperor’s life spent in camp
-and court dominated by military pomp and ambition, he has given more
-than ten years to military environment and much less than ten years
-to the bulk of his people, and it would not be impossible to imagine
-such a conversion due to the reaction of environment and interest.
-Such a change having taken place, should we hold him royal in temper
-or worthy of the traditions of knight-errantry, if he were held back
-by commercial considerations, if he hesitated because the Krupp
-Company could sell no more guns and would be thrown out of business?
-We should say to this Emperor whom our imaginations have evoked,
-Were your enthusiasms genuine enough, were your insights absolutely
-true, you would see of how little consequence these things really
-are, and how easily adjusted. Let the Krupp factories, with their
-tremendous resources in machinery and men, proceed to manufacture
-dredging machines for the reclaiming of the waste land in Posen; let
-them make new inventions to relieve the drudgery of the peasant,
-agricultural implements adequate to Germany’s agricultural resources
-and possibilities. They will find need for all the power of invention
-which they can command, all the manufacturing and commercial ability
-which they now employ. It is part of your new vocation to adjust the
-industries now tributary to the standing armies and organization
-of warfare, to useful and beneficent occupations; to transform and
-readjust all their dependent industries, from the manufacturing of
-cannon and war-ships to that of gold braid and epaulets. It is your
-mission to revive and increase agriculture, industry, and commerce,
-by diverting all the energy which is now directed to the feeding,
-clothing, and arming of the idle, into the legitimate and normal
-channels of life.
-
-It is certainly not more difficult to imagine such a change occurring
-to an entire people than in the mind and purpose of one man--in fact,
-such changes are going on all about us.
-
-The advance of constructive labor and the subsidence and disappearance
-of destructive warfare is a genuine line of progression. One sees much
-of protection and something of construction in the office of war, as
-the Roman bridges survived throughout Europe long after the legions
-which built them and crossed them for new conquests had passed out of
-mind. Also, in the rising tide of labor there is a large admixture of
-warfare, of the purely militant spirit which is sometimes so dominant
-that it throws the entire movement into confusion and leads the laborer
-to renounce his birthright; but nevertheless the desire for battle is
-becoming constantly more restricted in area. It still sways in regions
-where men of untamed blood are dwelling, and among men who, because
-they regard themselves as a superior race, imagine that they are free
-from the ordinary moral restraints; but its territory constantly
-grows smaller and its manifestations more guarded. Doubtless war will
-exist for many generations among semi-savage tribes, and it will also
-break out in those nations which may be roused and dominated by the
-unrestricted commercial spirit; but the ordinary life of man will go
-on without it, as it becomes transmitted into a desire for normal human
-relationship.
-
-It is difficult to predict at what moment the conviction that war is
-foolish or wasteful or unjustifiable may descend upon the earth, and
-it is also impossible to estimate among how many groups of people this
-conviction has already become established.
-
-The Doukhobors are a religious sect in Russia whose creed emphasizes
-the teaching of non-resistance. A story is told of one of their young
-men who, because of his refusal to enter the Russian army, was brought
-for trial before a judge, who reasoned with him concerning the folly
-of his course and in return received a homily upon the teachings of
-Jesus. “Quite right you are,” answered the judge, “from the point of
-abstract virtue, but the time has not yet come to put into practise the
-literal sayings of Christ.” “The time may not have come for you, your
-Honor,” was the reply, “but the time has come for us.” Who can tell at
-what hour vast numbers of Russian peasants upon those Russian steppes
-will decide that the time has come for them to renounce warfare, even
-as their prototype, the mujik, Count Tolstoy, has already decided that
-it has come for him? Conscious as the peasants are of religious motive,
-they will meet a cheerful martyrdom for their convictions, as so many
-of the Doukhobors have done. It may, however, be easy to overestimate
-this changed temper because of the simple yet dramatic formulation
-given by Tolstoy to the non-resisting spirit. How far Tolstoy is really
-the mouthpiece of a great moral change going on in the life of the
-Russian peasant and how far he speaks merely for himself, it is, of
-course, impossible to state. If only a few peasants are experiencing
-this change, his genius has certainly done much to make their position
-definite. The man who assumes that a new degree of virtue is possible,
-thereby makes it real and tangible to those who long to possess it but
-lack courage. Tolstoy at least is ready to predict that in the great
-affairs of national disarmament, it may easily be true that the Russian
-peasants will take the first steps.
-
-Their armed rebellion may easily be overcome by armed troops, but what
-can be done with their permanent patience, their insatiable hunger
-for holiness? All idealism has its prudential aspects, and, as has
-been pointed out by Mr. Perris,[17] no other form of revolution is so
-fitted to an agricultural people as this continued outburst of passive
-resistance among whole communities, not in theory, but in practise.
-This peasant movement goes on in spite of persecution, perfectly
-spontaneous, self-reliant, colossal in the silent confidence and power
-of endurance. In this day of Maxim guns and high explosives, the old
-method of revolt would be impossible to an agricultural people, but
-the non-resistant strike against military service lies directly in
-line with the temperament and capacity of the Russian people. That
-“the government cannot put the whole population in prison, and, if it
-could, it would still be without material for an army, and without
-money for its support,” is an almost irrefutable argument. We see here,
-at least, the beginnings of a sentiment that shall, if sufficiently
-developed, make war impossible to an entire people, a conviction of sin
-manifesting itself throughout a nation.
-
-Whatever may have been true of the revolutionist of the past when
-his spike was on a certain level of equality with the bayonet of
-the regular soldier, and his enthusiasm and daring could, in large
-measure, overcome the difference, it is certainly true now that
-such simple arms as a revolutionist could command, would be utterly
-futile against the equipment of the regular soldier. To continue the
-use of armed force means, under these circumstances, that we must
-refer the possibilities of all social and industrial advance to the
-consent of the owners of the Maxim guns. We must deny to the humble
-the possibility of the initiation of progressive movements employing
-revolution or, at least, we must defer all advance until the humble
-many can persuade the powerful few of the righteousness of their cause,
-and we must throw out the working class from participation in the
-beginnings of social revolutions. Tolstoy would make non-resistance
-aggressive. He would carry over into the reservoirs of moral influence
-all the strength which is now spent in coercion and resistance. It
-is an experiment which in its fullness has never been tried in human
-history, and it is worthy of a genius. As moral influence has ever a
-larger place in individual relationship and as physical force becomes
-daily more restricted in area, so Tolstoy would “speed up” the process
-in collective relationships and reset the whole of international life
-upon the basis of good will and intelligent understanding. It does not
-matter that he has entered these new moral fields through the narrow
-gateway of personal experience; that he sets forth his convictions with
-the limitations of the Russian governmental environment; that he is
-regarded at this moment by the Russian revolutionists as a quietist and
-reactionary. He has nevertheless reached down into the moral life of
-the humble people and formulated for them as for us the secret of their
-long patience and unremitting labor. Therefore, in the teachings of
-Tolstoy, as in the life of the peasants, coextensive with the doctrine
-of non-resistance, stress is laid upon productive labor. The peasant
-Bandereff, from whom Tolstoy claims to have learned much, has not only
-proclaimed himself as against war, but has written a marvelous book
-entitled “Bread Labor,” expressing once more the striking antithesis,
-the eternal contrast between war and labor, and between those who abhor
-the one and ever advocate the other.
-
-War on the one hand--plain destruction, Von Moltke called
-it--represents the life of the garrison and the tax-gatherer, the Roman
-emperor and his degenerate people, living upon the fruits of their
-conquest. Labor, on the other hand, represents productive effort,
-holding carefully what has been garnered by the output of brain and
-muscle, guarding the harvest jealously because it is the precious bread
-men live by.
-
-It is quite possible that we have committed the time-honored folly of
-looking for a sudden change in men’s attitude toward war, even as the
-poor alchemists wasted their lives in searching for a magic fluid and
-did nothing to discover the great laws governing chemical changes and
-reactions, the knowledge of which would have developed untold wealth
-beyond their crude dreams of transmuted gold.
-
-The final moral reaction may at last come, accompanied by deep remorse,
-too tardy to reclaim all the human life which has been spent and the
-treasure which has been wasted, or it may come with a great sense of
-joy that all voluntary destruction of human life, all the deliberate
-wasting of the fruits of labor, have become a thing of the past, and
-that whatever the future contains for us, it will at least be free
-from war. We may at last comprehend the truth of that which Ruskin has
-stated so many times, that we worship the soldier, not because he goes
-forth to slay, but to be slain.
-
-That this world peace movement should be arising from the humblest
-without the sanction and in some cases with the explicit indifference,
-of the church founded by the Prince of Peace, is simply another example
-of the strange paths of moral evolution.
-
-To some of us it seems clear that marked manifestations of this
-movement are found in the immigrant quarters of American cities. The
-previous survey of the immigrant situation would indicate that all the
-peoples of the world have become part of the American tribunal, and
-that their sense of pity, their clamor for personal kindness, their
-insistence upon the right to join in our progress, can no longer be
-disregarded. The burdens and sorrows of men have unexpectedly become
-intelligent and urgent to this nation, and it is only by accepting
-them with some magnanimity that we can develop the larger sense of
-justice which is becoming world-wide and is lying in ambush, as it
-were, to manifest itself in governmental relations. Men of all nations
-are determining upon the abolition of degrading poverty, disease, and
-intellectual weakness, with their resulting industrial inefficiency,
-and are making a determined effort to conserve even the feeblest
-citizen to the State. To join in this determined effort is to break
-through national bonds and to unlock the latent fellowship between man
-and man. In a political campaign men will go through every possible
-hardship in response to certain political loyalties; in a moment of
-national danger men will sacrifice every personal advantage. It is but
-necessary to make this fellowship wider, to extend its scope without
-lowering its intensity. Those emotions which stir the spirit to deeds
-of self-surrender and to high enthusiasm, are among the world’s most
-precious assets. That this emotion has so often become associated with
-war, by no means proves that it cannot be used for other ends. There
-is something active and tangible in this new internationalism, although
-it is difficult to make it clear, and in our striving for a new word
-with which to express this new and important sentiment, we are driven
-to the rather absurd phrase of “cosmic patriotism.” Whatever it may
-be called, it may yet be strong enough to move masses of men out of
-their narrow national considerations and cautions into new reaches of
-human effort and affection. Religion has long ago taught that only
-as the individual can establish a sense of union with a power for
-righteousness not himself, can he experience peace; and it may be
-possible that the nations will be called to a similar experience.
-
-The International Peace Conference held in Boston in 1904 was opened
-by a huge meeting in which men of influence and modern thought from
-four continents, gave reasons for their belief in the passing of
-war. But none was so modern, so fundamental and so trenchant, as the
-address which was read from the prophet Isaiah. He founded the cause
-of peace upon the cause of righteousness, not only as expressed in
-political relations, but also in industrial relations. He contended
-that peace could be secured only as men abstained from the gains of
-oppression and responded to the cause of the poor; that swords would
-finally be beaten into plowshares and pruning-hooks, not because men
-resolved to be peaceful, but because all the metal of the earth would
-be turned to its proper use when the poor and their children should be
-abundantly fed. It was as if the ancient prophet foresaw that under
-an enlightened industrialism peace would no longer be an absence of
-war, but the unfolding of world-wide processes making for the nurture
-of human life. He predicted the moment which has come to us now that
-peace is no longer an abstract dogma but has become a rising tide of
-moral enthusiasm slowly engulfing all pride of conquest and making war
-impossible.
-
-
-FOOTNOTES:
-
-[16] Imperialism, by John A. Hobson. Page 128.
-
-[17] The Grand Mujik, G. H. Perris.
-
-
-
-
- INDEX
-
-
- Altruism, manifestations of, 17;
- in politics, 48.
-
- Anglo-Saxon, temptation to govern all peoples alike, 47;
- distrust of experiment, 67;
- individualistic, 68;
- attitude towards self-government, 112.
-
- Arbitration, change in attitude toward, 133;
- in New Zealand, 134.
-
- Aristotle’s ideal of a city, 92.
-
- Assimilation, limit to United States power of, 39;
- workingman’s attitude toward, 94, 117.
-
-
- Bandereff, 234.
-
- Bentham, 23.
-
- Bloch, Jean de, 4.
-
- Booth, Charles, maps of London, 86.
-
- Bosanquet, Mrs. Bernard, 116.
-
- Buckle, 23.
-
- Burns, John, 125.
-
-
- Charity, organization of in New York, 74;
- modern, democratic and constructive, 79;
- extension of, 84;
- and unskilled labor, 152.
-
- Chicago Municipal Lodging House, 157.
-
- Chicago Federation of Labor, 130, 131.
-
- Chicago Stock Yards Strike, power of unions for amalgamation shown in,
- 96;
- object of, 101, 111;
- use of referendum vote in, 103, 108;
- good order of, 104;
- paradoxes shown by, 104;
- example of national appeal subordinated to union, 106;
- strike-breaker in, 106;
- Greek in, 109.
-
- Child Labor, social waste of, 28;
- a national problem, 107;
- industrial value of, 154;
- responsibility of State, 156;
- effect of sub-divided, 158;
- effect of premature, 159;
- effect on parents, 161;
- effect on product, 162.
-
- Child Labor Legislation, makes for better citizens, 73;
- immigrant parents and, 74;
- uniform, 168;
- leisure gained for play, 169.
-
- Commerce, international, 115;
- modern representative of conquest, 116.
-
- Comte, Augustus, 217.
-
- Constitution of the U. S., and the immigrant, 42, 43, 72, 73.
-
- Contempt, social results of, 51;
- in industrialism, 116;
- for immigrant, 151;
- for primitive arts, 202.
-
- Cosmopolitan city, beginnings of newer ideals of peace found in, 11,
- 13, 18;
- centers of radicalism, 16;
- bond of union in, 17, 204;
- difficulties due to size of, 86, 216;
- subtle problems of, 206.
-
- Cosmopolitan standard, lack of, 78.
-
-
- Dante, 21.
-
- Democratic government, causes of failure of, 47;
- arousing enthusiasm for, 63;
- result of moral effort, 75;
- inherited form of, 121.
-
- Democracy, modified slowly, 37;
- repressive legislation in, 52;
- lack of civic expression for, 59;
- failure to apprehend, 91;
- effects of commercialism on, 222.
-
- Denver Juvenile Court, 81.
-
- Doctrinaire method, weakness of, 31;
- conditions settled by, 53;
- unattached to experience, 72;
- not fitted to modern patriotism, 74.
-
- Domestic service, 51;
- a review of the history of, 199.
-
- Doukhobors, situation in Canada, 67;
- emphasize non-resistance, 230;
- meet martyrdom, 231.
-
-
- Education, related to industrial efficiency, 16;
- belief in, as social remedy, 21;
- of vital importance to city, 73;
- compulsory, 74;
- advanced and reform schools, 82;
- passion in America, 85;
- distinctive achievement in America, 166;
- for factory children, 167;
- less expensive than repression, 175;
- already democratized, 178.
-
- Educators, recognizing industrialism, 169.
-
- Eighteenth-century philosophy, abandonment of, required, 28;
- inadequacy of, 31;
- responsible for immigration, 40;
- belief in universal franchise, 42;
- ideal man of, 60;
- ideals still influence statesman, 70;
- retained in America, 91;
- formula of equality, 117;
- radicalism of, 121.
-
- Employer, prone to attack new union, 129;
- charges against unions, 135;
- attitude toward business relations with unions, 138;
- traditions in household, 201.
-
- England, labor laws of, 152;
- debasement of products of, 166.
-
-
- Franchise, 38;
- universal panacea, 42;
- universal franchise, 52;
- beginnings of municipal, 180;
- military test absurd, 182;
- why women should have, 192.
-
- Factory system, 163;
- worst evils of, 149;
- uneducational, 173.
-
-
- Gang, almost tribal in organization, 176;
- political training in, 177.
-
- German Emperor, 224.
-
- Germany, government deals with needs of workingman, 88;
- police socialized in, 89;
- not afraid to extend municipal functions, 91;
- economic protection in, 122, 152;
- opposition to militarism in, 165.
-
- Golden, State Reform State School, 81.
-
- Government, newer manifestations of, 15;
- away from the life of the people, 35;
- oppressive, dependent on the sword, 36;
- opposition to, formerly patriotism, 42;
- dealing with naturalization, 42;
- test not current, 47;
- concern for the young incorporated in, 80;
- fear of extending functions, 84;
- traditional activities meagre, 87;
- non-interference in industry, 90;
- functions of, 101;
- patriotic citizens forced to ignore, 112.
-
-
- Hague tribunal, 5.
-
- Hebrew alliance, 74.
-
- Heroism, new, 25, 218.
-
- Historic method, 31, 63.
-
- Hobhouse, L. T., 6.
-
- Hobson, John A., 221.
-
- Household labor, conference at Lake Placid, 198;
- history of, in America, 199;
- causes of paucity of, 200.
-
- Hull-House, experiences, 50, 58, 77, 82, 91, 119, 143, 159, 194, 203,
- 204.
-
- Humanitarianism, in immigrant quarters, 15;
- aggressive, 26;
- scientific method applied to, 28;
- cosmopolitan, 76;
- present stage of, 79, 99;
- its relation to labor power, 165.
-
-
- Idealism, provincial aspects of, 231.
-
- Immigrants, emotional sentiment among, 13;
- unusual power of association among, 14;
- franchise extended to, 38;
- philosophy in regard to, 41;
- exploitation of, 42, 45;
- evasion of immigration laws by, 47;
- contempt for, 49;
- charm and historical association among, 64, 70;
- ignoring past experience of, 65;
- beginnings of self-government among, 71;
- relations of politician to, 72;
- attempts to teach patriotism to, 75;
- revelation of social customs among, 79;
- standardizing by workmen, 93;
- difficulties largely industrial, 94;
- as wage lowering weapon, 97;
- standard of living for, 102, 116;
- claim on charitable funds, 152;
- present contrasted with youthful condition of, 161;
- early industries among, 203;
- historic backgrounds of, 205;
- manifestations of peace movement among, 235.
-
- Immigration, decreased by industrial depression, 44;
- of recent years, 200.
-
- Industrialism, 15;
- versus militarism, 28, 220;
- significance of primitive arts in relation to, 64;
- idealism in, 95;
- as basis for legislation, 121.
-
- Industrial interests, in contemporary life, 42;
- and the immigrant, 71;
- germane to government, 122;
- and international peace, 113.
-
- Industrial development, changes in, 124.
-
- Illiterate children in the U. S., 163.
-
- Internationalism, 23;
- socialism based on, 114;
- Mazzini’s address on, 115;
- active and tangible, 237.
-
- International Peace Conference in Boston, 237.
-
- Interparliamentary union for international arbitration, 6.
-
- Institute of International Law, 6.
-
-
- James, William, 24.
-
- Jefferson, Thomas, 31.
-
- Justice, the larger, 236.
-
- Juvenile Courts, 80;
- Denver, 81;
- parental attitude of, 82.
-
-
- Kant, 23.
-
- Kelley, Mrs. Florence, 153.
-
-
- Lecky, 222.
-
- London, Charles Booth, maps of, 87;
- government of, 88.
-
-
- Machinery and the industrial situation, 149.
-
- Mazzini, 29, 115.
-
- Militarism, versus industrialism, 28;
- police department a survival of, 55;
- mediaeval city founded on, 207;
- negative results of, 220.
-
- Mitchell, John, 126, 146.
-
- Morality, class, 27;
- group, 124, 145;
- antiquated codes of, 210;
- village standards of, 215.
-
- Morley, John, 118.
-
- Morris, William, 203.
-
- Municipal government, admitted failure of, 31;
- full of survivals, 34;
- two points of rapid development in, 79;
- ignores interests of average citizen, 85;
- failure to provide playgrounds, 176;
- indifference of citizens to, 183;
- woman’s traditional activities in, 184.
-
-
- Naturalization, 42;
- rests on laws of 1802, 43;
- brokerage in papers of, 46, 71;
- test not contemporaneous, 42.
-
- Non-resistance, a misleading word, 8;
- non-resistance strike, 232;
- aggressive, 233.
-
-
- Patriotism, belief that war engenders, 18;
- a newer, arising, 19;
- founded on sacrifice, 74;
- taught too formally, 75;
- primitive core of, 91;
- founded on war, 140, 217;
- bound in trappings of the past, 214.
-
- Peace, dynamic versus dogmatic, 7;
- predicted by Isaiah, 237.
-
- Perris, G. H., 231.
-
- Play, a social stimulus, 171;
- develops self-government and discipline, 173;
- attitude of enlightened city government to, 178.
-
- Politician, professional, produced by mechanical government, 52;
- friend of the vicious, 56;
- appeals to human sentiment, 59;
- first friend of immigrant, 72;
- understands people’s hopes, 79;
- attempts to control strike, 103.
-
- Protective legislation, aggressive aspect of the newer
- humanitarianism, 28;
- U. S. deficient in, 152.
-
-
- Reformer, contemptuous attitude of, 49;
- sweeping condemnations of, 57;
- alliance with business interests of, 61.
-
- Revolutionary War, 36, 37.
-
- Revolutionist, 232.
-
- Repressive legislation, 54;
- human element in, 55.
-
- Royce, Josiah, 32.
-
- Ruskin, 235.
-
- Russia, 68;
- the mir, 67;
- attitude toward workmen, 122;
- the army of, 230.
-
-
- Self-government, difficulties and blunders of, 32;
- crux of local, 35;
- skepticism for ideals of, 39;
- must deal with unsuccessful, 62;
- scope of, 63;
- forms of democracy for, 88;
- immigrants’ first lesson in, 95;
- clearly not yet attained, 108;
- popular government oppressor of, 104;
- might profit by industrial experience, 121.
-
- Shakespeare, 9.
-
- Social, evolution, 211;
- morality in, 213.
-
- Socialism, based on internationalism and industrialism, 114.
-
- Socialist’s attitude to present government, 86.
-
- St. Francis, 21.
-
-
- Teamsters’ strike, war element in, 132;
- employers’ position as to arbitration in, 134;
- alliance between employers’ and unionists’ offices in, 135;
- inexperience of merchant employers in, 136;
- social results of, 141.
-
- Tolstoy, 3, 4, 209, 225, 230, 231, 233, 234.
-
- Tribal law, 11.
-
- Tribal Morality, 18.
-
- Trades unions imitate city government, 94;
- teach immigrants self-government, 95;
- power for amalgamation of, 97;
- attitude toward violence, 98;
- causes for loss of sympathy for, in Stock Yards Strike, 101;
- human appeal in, 102;
- gratitude of immigrant toward, 107;
- devotion to, might be turned to national life, 118;
- organized by Russian government, 122;
- contemporaneous movement difficult to judge, 125;
- success not sole standard of, 128;
- present a time of crisis for, 129;
- attitude toward strike, 130;
- social result of strike on, 144;
- struggle for recognition, 145;
- attitude toward improved machinery, 148;
- uncomprehending victim of, 195.
-
-
- War, defence of, 26;
- prophecy of subsidence of, 23;
- moral equivalent for, 24;
- ideals in peace confusing, 110;
- phraseology of new union, 130;
- crime traceable to Spanish, 143;
- new social problems not to be settled, 206;
- attempts to justify by past records, 210;
- substitutes for virtues of, 217;
- contrast between labor and, 234.
-
- Warfare, cost of, 4;
- customary method of settling labor disputes, 135;
- recognition of good in, 212;
- civilization substitutes law for, 219;
- ideals of labor substituted for those of, 224;
- disappearance of, 229.
-
- Webb, Mrs. Sidney, 191.
-
- Whitman, Walt, 45.
-
- Wilcox, Dr. Charles F., 54.
-
- Wilcox, Delos F., 117.
-
- Women, duty toward municipal government, 28, 185, 208;
- conventions a snare to, 186;
- franchise only for educated, 188;
- effect of machinery on work of, 190;
- increasing employment of, 189;
- necessity for protection of working, 191, 196;
- necessity for franchise for, 191, 197;
- relation to clothing manufacture, 192;
- lack in education of, 197, 202, 206.
-
-
- Verestchagin, 3, 4.
-
- Von Moltke, 234.
-
-
-
-
- _BY THE SAME AUTHOR_
-
- DEMOCRACY AND SOCIAL ETHICS
-
- =By JANE ADDAMS=, Hull-House, Chicago. 9 + 281 pages, 12 mo., cloth,
- leather back, $1.25 net. Citizen’s Library.
-
-
-“Miss Addams is clear. She has not been precipitate in the preparation
-of her book. She has reconsidered, corrected, and recorrected it,
-spoken with temperance and courtesy.... As gentle, as patient, as
-sincere, and as astute as Jane Addams herself is the philosophy set
-forth in these pages.... The processes of Miss Addams’ thought are
-interesting to thousands. The sense that none of us is living up to
-the best idea of democracy is upon each of us.... Miss Addams is
-bound to receive a respectful hearing. As a leader who ever prays to
-lead aright, a sociologist who is willing to test her theories in a
-practical and personal way, a theorist who is not ashamed to own when
-she has been mistaken, a friend who will remain true to her friend no
-matter what may arise, and a person of leisure and power, who has the
-civic interest at heart, she has come to be prized as one of the chief
-of citizens.”--_Chicago Tribune._
-
-“Its pages are remarkably--we were about to say refreshingly--free
-from the customary academic limitations.... In fact, are the result
-of actual experience in hand to hand contact with social problems....
-No more truthful description, for example, of the political ‘boss’ as
-he thrives to-day in our great cities has ever been written than is
-contained in Miss Addams’ chapter on ‘Political Reform.’ The whole
-chapter will be accepted as a realistic picture of conditions as they
-are to-day in the city of Chicago. The same thing may be said of the
-other chapters of the book in regard to their presentation of social
-and economic facts.”--_Review of Reviews._
-
-“Too much emphasis cannot be laid upon the efficiency and inspiration
-afforded by these essays. ‘Charitable Effort,’ ‘Filial Affections,’
-‘Household Adjustment,’ ‘Industrial Amelioration,’ ‘Educational
-Methods,’ ‘Political Reform,’ are the topics treated in a masterly and
-revolutionary style. Miss Addams shatters some of our most cherished
-illusions upon the relations which should exist between the helper and
-the helped, between parent and child, mistress and maid, the members
-of a family, between the ‘boss’ and the community. She takes the
-subject entirely out of the realms of sentimentality, puts it upon
-a solid moral basis, and by a close and logical train of reasoning
-brings her conclusions home to the conscience and common sense of every
-member of the social structure. The book is startling, stimulating and
-intelligent.”--_Philadelphia Ledger._
-
-
- The Arbiter in Council
-
-A discussion of peace and war, in which take part, each from his own
-viewpoint, a lawyer “with a conscience,” a stock broker, a learned
-professor of history, a journalist, a retired admiral, an army officer,
-and two clergymen of widely differing forms of church government. The
-Arbiter is a veteran student of politics, a disciple of John Bright.
-
- “As a summary of all that is to be said on the subject, thrown into
- readable form, the book is well done; ... almost no topic is left
- untouched.”--_Nation._
-
- “What strikes one in reading this book even more than its
- readableness, is the wide range of its information.... The points of
- view offered are many and diversified.... No argument worth using is
- left unused.”--_The Evening Mail._
-
- “The subjects discussed include the causes and consequences of war;
- modern warfare; private war and the duel; perpetual peace or the
- federation of the world; arbitration, the political economy of war,
- and Christianity and war. It is a notable book, or will become one as
- it is widely read.”--Editorial in _The Boston Herald_.
-
- “The Arbiter’s friends are drawn from several ranks in life, and
- they bring to the symposium wide reading in the literature of the
- subject, logical powers and a persuasive manner of speaking. ‘The
- Arbiter in Council’ may be regarded as a conspectus of the best
- thought on warfare, especially in relation to the topic of universal
- peace.”--_Philadelphia Press._
-
-
- 6 + 567 pages, 8’vo., cloth, $2.50 net.
-
-
-On many of the subjects touched upon in Miss Addams’s “The Newer Ideals
-of Peace” interesting material may be found in the volumes named
-below:--
-
-
- ON CITY GOVERNMENT
-
- The American City
-
- By DELOS F. WILCOX, Ph. D.
-
- “In the ‘American City’ Dr. Wilcox ... has written a book that every
- thoughtful citizen should read. The problems of the street, the
- tenement, public utilities, civic education, the three deadly vices,
- municipal revenue and municipal debt, with all their related and
- subsidiary problems, are clearly and fully considered.”--_Pittsburgh
- Gazette._
-
- =6 + 423 pages, 12 mo., cloth, leather back, $1.25 net.= _Citizen’s
- Library._
-
-
- ON THE LABOR PROBLEM
-
- Labor Problems
-
-By THOMAS SEWALL ADAMS, Ph. D., Assistant Professor of Political
-Economy, and HELEN L. SUMNER, Honorary Fellow in Political Economy,
-University of Wisconsin.
-
- “A volume which has a labor-saving value for any library.... Here
- one finds upon each of the problems treated--woman and child labor,
- immigration, strikes and boycotts, labor organizations and employers’
- associations, the agencies of industrial peace, profit-sharing,
- co-operation, industrial education, labor laws, and the material
- progress of the wage-earning classes--the principal facts and comments
- of all the chief authorities ... with helpful bibliographical lists
- and references to volumes and chapters.”--_The Commons_, Chicago.
-
- =15 + 579 pages, cr. 8 vo., cloth, $1.60 net.=
-
-
- ON INDUSTRIAL LEGISLATION
-
- Some Ethical Gains Through Legislation
-
- By MRS. FLORENCE KELLEY.
-
-The book has grown out of the author’s experience as Chief Inspector of
-Factories in Illinois from 1893 to 1897, as Secretary of the National
-Consumers’ League from 1899 till now, and chiefly as a resident at
-Hull-House, and later at the Nurses’ Settlement, New York.
-
- “Mrs. Kelley’s primary aim is to set forth the results achieved by
- the agitation and education of the past decade or so in certain
- social directions--in the recognition of the children’s right to
- childhood and to instruction and to opportunity, of the adult’s right
- to leisure, of woman’s right to the ballot, and of the purchaser’s
- right to genuine honest products. Her secondary aim is to show how
- much remains to be achieved, and what obstacles the friends of
- anti-child-labor legislation, eight-hour laws, pure food and correct
- label laws, woman suffrage and so on, have to surmount.”--_The
- Record-Herald_, Chicago.
-
-=Cloth, leather back, 341 pp., 12 mo., $1.25 net.= _Citizen’s Library._
-
-
- ON SOME CONDITIONS OF CHILD LIFE
-
- The Bitter Cry of the Children
-
-By JOHN SPARGO, Author of “Socialism.”
-
- “‘There have been many books written about the children of the poor,
- but none of them gives us so impressive a statement as is contained
- here of the most important and powerful cause of poverty.’ This
- prefatory judgment of Robert Hunter will be handed on by everyone who
- reads.... The book will live and set hundreds of teachers and social
- workers and philanthropists to work.... School teachers need this
- book, social workers, librarians, pastors, editors, all who want to
- understand the problem of poverty or education.”--WILLIAM H. ALLEN in
- _The Annals of the American Academy_.
-
- =16 + 257 pages, 12 mo., $1.25 net.=
-
-
- ON CONDITIONS AMONG THE POOR
-
- =Poverty.= A Definition and an Estimate of its Extent
-
-By ROBERT HUNTER, President of the Social Reform Club; Chairman of New
-York Child Labor Committee; formerly head worker of the University
-Settlement of New York.
-
- “I cannot delay writing you of my profound interest in your new
- book, ‘Poverty,’ which I have to-day read, with instruction, with
- satisfaction, and with a deep sense of your mastery of the subject....
- Your chapter on ‘The Immigrant’ seems to me the most concise, the most
- convincing and the most logical brief statement of the subject that I
- have ever seen.”--ROBERT DE C. WARD, Harvard University.
-
- =9 + 382 pages, 12 mo., cloth, $1.50, net.=
-
-
- A SOCIOLOGICAL SOURCE-BOOK
-
- Readings in Descriptive and Historical Sociology
-
-Edited by FRANKLIN H. GIDDINGS, Ph.D., LL.D., Professor of Sociology
-and the History of Civilization in Columbia University. The book
-is a selection of extracts from sources ranging from the Bible to
-yesterday’s newspaper, connected with a mere outline of theory. The
-book is at once a rounded outline of social theory, and a suggestive
-guide in the method of classifying the new materials constantly
-appearing in reviews and the daily press.
-
- =24 + 553 pages, cloth, 12 mo., $1.60 net.=
-
-
- THE MACMILLAN COMPANY
- Publishers 64-66 Fifth Ave. New York
-
-
-
-
- Transcriber’s Notes
-
-Errors in punctuation have been fixed.
-
-Page 12: “many nationalties” changed to “many nationalities”
-
-Page 35: “the the hands” changed to “the hands”
-
-Page 116: “Bernard Bosenquet” changed to “Bernard Bosanquet”
-
-Page 123: “emanicipated serfs” changed to “emancipated serfs”
-
-Page 173: “of the the group” changed to “of the group”
-
-Page 174: “girls wr bars of soap” changed to “girls wrap bars of soap”
-
-Page 192: “insanity workshops” changed to “insanitary workshops”
-
-Page 194: “work inself” changed to “work itself”
-
-*** END OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK NEWER IDEALS OF PEACE ***
-
-Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions will
-be renamed.
-
-Creating the works from print editions not protected by U.S. copyright
-law means that no one owns a United States copyright in these works,
-so the Foundation (and you!) can copy and distribute it in the
-United States without permission and without paying copyright
-royalties. Special rules, set forth in the General Terms of Use part
-of this license, apply to copying and distributing Project
-Gutenberg™ electronic works to protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG™
-concept and trademark. Project Gutenberg is a registered trademark,
-and may not be used if you charge for an eBook, except by following
-the terms of the trademark license, including paying royalties for use
-of the Project Gutenberg trademark. If you do not charge anything for
-copies of this eBook, complying with the trademark license is very
-easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose such as creation
-of derivative works, reports, performances and research. Project
-Gutenberg eBooks may be modified and printed and given away--you may
-do practically ANYTHING in the United States with eBooks not protected
-by U.S. copyright law. Redistribution is subject to the trademark
-license, especially commercial redistribution.
-
-START: FULL LICENSE
-
-THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE
-PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK
-
-To protect the Project Gutenberg™ mission of promoting the free
-distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work
-(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase “Project
-Gutenberg”), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full
-Project Gutenberg™ License available with this file or online at
-www.gutenberg.org/license.
-
-Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project
-Gutenberg™ electronic works
-
-1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg™
-electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to
-and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property
-(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all
-the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or
-destroy all copies of Project Gutenberg™ electronic works in your
-possession. If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a
-Project Gutenberg™ electronic work and you do not agree to be bound
-by the terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the
-person or entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph
-1.E.8.
-
-1.B. “Project Gutenberg” is a registered trademark. It may only be
-used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who
-agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few
-things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg™ electronic works
-even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See
-paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project
-Gutenberg™ electronic works if you follow the terms of this
-agreement and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg™
-electronic works. See paragraph 1.E below.
-
-1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation (“the
-Foundation” or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection
-of Project Gutenberg™ electronic works. Nearly all the individual
-works in the collection are in the public domain in the United
-States. If an individual work is unprotected by copyright law in the
-United States and you are located in the United States, we do not
-claim a right to prevent you from copying, distributing, performing,
-displaying or creating derivative works based on the work as long as
-all references to Project Gutenberg are removed. Of course, we hope
-that you will support the Project Gutenberg™ mission of promoting
-free access to electronic works by freely sharing Project Gutenberg™
-works in compliance with the terms of this agreement for keeping the
-Project Gutenberg™ name associated with the work. You can easily
-comply with the terms of this agreement by keeping this work in the
-same format with its attached full Project Gutenberg™ License when
-you share it without charge with others.
-
-1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern
-what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are
-in a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States,
-check the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this
-agreement before downloading, copying, displaying, performing,
-distributing or creating derivative works based on this work or any
-other Project Gutenberg™ work. The Foundation makes no
-representations concerning the copyright status of any work in any
-country other than the United States.
-
-1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg:
-
-1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other
-immediate access to, the full Project Gutenberg™ License must appear
-prominently whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg™ work (any work
-on which the phrase “Project Gutenberg” appears, or with which the
-phrase “Project Gutenberg” is associated) is accessed, displayed,
-performed, viewed, copied or distributed:
-
- This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States and
- most other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no
- restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it
- under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included with this
- eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org. If you are not located in the
- United States, you will have to check the laws of the country where
- you are located before using this eBook.
-
-1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg™ electronic work is
-derived from texts not protected by U.S. copyright law (does not
-contain a notice indicating that it is posted with permission of the
-copyright holder), the work can be copied and distributed to anyone in
-the United States without paying any fees or charges. If you are
-redistributing or providing access to a work with the phrase “Project
-Gutenberg” associated with or appearing on the work, you must comply
-either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 or
-obtain permission for the use of the work and the Project Gutenberg™
-trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.
-
-1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg™ electronic work is posted
-with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution
-must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any
-additional terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms
-will be linked to the Project Gutenberg™ License for all works
-posted with the permission of the copyright holder found at the
-beginning of this work.
-
-1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg™
-License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this
-work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg™.
-
-1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this
-electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without
-prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with
-active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project
-Gutenberg™ License.
-
-1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary,
-compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including
-any word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access
-to or distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg™ work in a format
-other than “Plain Vanilla ASCII” or other format used in the official
-version posted on the official Project Gutenberg™ website
-(www.gutenberg.org), you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense
-to the user, provide a copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means
-of obtaining a copy upon request, of the work in its original “Plain
-Vanilla ASCII” or other form. Any alternate format must include the
-full Project Gutenberg™ License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1.
-
-1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying,
-performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg™ works
-unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.
-
-1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing
-access to or distributing Project Gutenberg™ electronic works
-provided that:
-
-• You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from
- the use of Project Gutenberg™ works calculated using the method
- you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is owed
- to the owner of the Project Gutenberg™ trademark, but he has
- agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the Project
- Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments must be paid
- within 60 days following each date on which you prepare (or are
- legally required to prepare) your periodic tax returns. Royalty
- payments should be clearly marked as such and sent to the Project
- Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the address specified in
- Section 4, “Information about donations to the Project Gutenberg
- Literary Archive Foundation.”
-
-• You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies
- you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he
- does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg™
- License. You must require such a user to return or destroy all
- copies of the works possessed in a physical medium and discontinue
- all use of and all access to other copies of Project Gutenberg™
- works.
-
-• You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of
- any money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the
- electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days of
- receipt of the work.
-
-• You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
- distribution of Project Gutenberg™ works.
-
-1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project
-Gutenberg™ electronic work or group of works on different terms than
-are set forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing
-from the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the manager of
-the Project Gutenberg™ trademark. Contact the Foundation as set
-forth in Section 3 below.
-
-1.F.
-
-1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable
-effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread
-works not protected by U.S. copyright law in creating the Project
-Gutenberg™ collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg™
-electronic works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may
-contain “Defects,” such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate
-or corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other
-intellectual property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or
-other medium, a computer virus, or computer codes that damage or
-cannot be read by your equipment.
-
-1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the “Right
-of Replacement or Refund” described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project
-Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project
-Gutenberg™ trademark, and any other party distributing a Project
-Gutenberg™ electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all
-liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal
-fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT
-LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE
-PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE
-TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE
-LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR
-INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH
-DAMAGE.
-
-1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a
-defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can
-receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a
-written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you
-received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium
-with your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you
-with the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in
-lieu of a refund. If you received the work electronically, the person
-or entity providing it to you may choose to give you a second
-opportunity to receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If
-the second copy is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing
-without further opportunities to fix the problem.
-
-1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth
-in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you “AS-IS”, WITH NO
-OTHER WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT
-LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.
-
-1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied
-warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of
-damages. If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement
-violates the law of the state applicable to this agreement, the
-agreement shall be interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or
-limitation permitted by the applicable state law. The invalidity or
-unenforceability of any provision of this agreement shall not void the
-remaining provisions.
-
-1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the
-trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone
-providing copies of Project Gutenberg™ electronic works in
-accordance with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the
-production, promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg™
-electronic works, harmless from all liability, costs and expenses,
-including legal fees, that arise directly or indirectly from any of
-the following which you do or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this
-or any Project Gutenberg™ work, (b) alteration, modification, or
-additions or deletions to any Project Gutenberg™ work, and (c) any
-Defect you cause.
-
-Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg™
-
-Project Gutenberg™ is synonymous with the free distribution of
-electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of
-computers including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It
-exists because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations
-from people in all walks of life.
-
-Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the
-assistance they need are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg™'s
-goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg™ collection will
-remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project
-Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure
-and permanent future for Project Gutenberg™ and future
-generations. To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary
-Archive Foundation and how your efforts and donations can help, see
-Sections 3 and 4 and the Foundation information page at
-www.gutenberg.org
-
-Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary
-Archive Foundation
-
-The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non-profit
-501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the
-state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal
-Revenue Service. The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification
-number is 64-6221541. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg Literary
-Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent permitted by
-U.S. federal laws and your state's laws.
-
-The Foundation's business office is located at 809 North 1500 West,
-Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887. Email contact links and up
-to date contact information can be found at the Foundation's website
-and official page at www.gutenberg.org/contact
-
-Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg
-Literary Archive Foundation
-
-Project Gutenberg™ depends upon and cannot survive without
-widespread public support and donations to carry out its mission of
-increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be
-freely distributed in machine-readable form accessible by the widest
-array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations
-($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt
-status with the IRS.
-
-The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating
-charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United
-States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a
-considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up
-with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations
-where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To SEND
-DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any particular
-state visit www.gutenberg.org/donate
-
-While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we
-have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition
-against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who
-approach us with offers to donate.
-
-International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make
-any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from
-outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff.
-
-Please check the Project Gutenberg web pages for current donation
-methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other
-ways including checks, online payments and credit card donations. To
-donate, please visit: www.gutenberg.org/donate
-
-Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg™ electronic works
-
-Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project
-Gutenberg™ concept of a library of electronic works that could be
-freely shared with anyone. For forty years, he produced and
-distributed Project Gutenberg™ eBooks with only a loose network of
-volunteer support.
-
-Project Gutenberg™ eBooks are often created from several printed
-editions, all of which are confirmed as not protected by copyright in
-the U.S. unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not
-necessarily keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper
-edition.
-
-Most people start at our website which has the main PG search
-facility: www.gutenberg.org
-
-This website includes information about Project Gutenberg™,
-including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary
-Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to
-subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks.
diff --git a/old/69879-0.zip b/old/69879-0.zip
deleted file mode 100644
index 0c8f0f0..0000000
--- a/old/69879-0.zip
+++ /dev/null
Binary files differ
diff --git a/old/69879-h.zip b/old/69879-h.zip
deleted file mode 100644
index 1eedecd..0000000
--- a/old/69879-h.zip
+++ /dev/null
Binary files differ
diff --git a/old/69879-h/69879-h.htm b/old/69879-h/69879-h.htm
deleted file mode 100644
index 11c66d6..0000000
--- a/old/69879-h/69879-h.htm
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,6930 +0,0 @@
-<!DOCTYPE html>
-<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en" lang="en">
-<head>
- <meta charset="UTF-8">
- <title>
- Newer Ideals of Peace, by Jane Addams—A Project Gutenberg eBook
- </title>
- <link rel="icon" href="images/cover.jpg" type="image/x-cover">
- <style> /* <![CDATA[ */
-
-body {
- margin-left: 10%;
- margin-right: 10%;
-}
-
- h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6 {
- text-align: center; /* all headings centered */
- clear: both;
-}
-
-p {
- margin-top: .51em;
- text-align: justify;
- margin-bottom: .49em;
- text-indent: 1em;
-}
-
-.p2 {margin-top: 2em;}
-.p4 {margin-top: 4em;}
-
-hr {
- width: 33%;
- margin-top: 2em;
- margin-bottom: 2em;
- margin-left: 33.5%;
- margin-right: 33.5%;
- clear: both;
-}
-
-hr.tb {width: 45%; margin-left: 27.5%; margin-right: 27.5%;}
-hr.chap {width: 65%; margin-left: 17.5%; margin-right: 17.5%;}
-@media print { hr.chap {display: none; visibility: hidden;} }
-
-hr.r5 {width: 5%; margin-top: 1em; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 47.5%; margin-right: 47.5%;}
-
-div.chapter {page-break-before: always;}
-h2.nobreak {page-break-before: avoid;}
-
-ul.index { list-style-type: none; margin-top: 2em;}
-li.ifrst {
- margin-top: 1em;
- text-indent: -2em;
- padding-left: 1em;
-}
-li.isuba {
- text-indent: -2em;
- padding-left: 2em;
-}
-
-table {
- margin-left: auto;
- margin-right: auto;
-}
-table.autotable { border-collapse: collapse; width: 60%;}
-table.autotable td,
-table.autotable th { padding: 4px; }
-.x-ebookmaker table {width: 95%;}
-
-.tdr {text-align: right;}
-.tdc {text-align: center;}
-.page {width: 3em; vertical-align: top;}
-
-.pagenum { /* uncomment the next line for invisible page numbers */
- /* visibility: hidden; */
- position: absolute;
- left: 92%;
- font-size: smaller;
- text-align: right;
- font-style: normal;
- font-weight: normal;
- font-variant: normal;
- text-indent: 0;
-}
-
-.blockquot {
- margin-left: 5%;
- margin-right: 5%;
-}
-
-.center {text-align: center; text-indent: 0em;}
-
-.right {text-align: right; text-indent: 0em;}
-
-.smcap {font-variant: small-caps;}
-
-/* Footnotes */
-.footnotes {border: 1px dashed; margin-top: 1em;}
-
-.footnote {margin-left: 10%; margin-right: 10%; font-size: 0.9em;}
-
-.footnote .label {position: absolute; right: 84%; text-align: right;}
-
-.fnanchor {
- vertical-align: super;
- font-size: .8em;
- text-decoration:
- none;
-}
-/* Transcriber's notes */
-.transnote {background-color: #E6E6FA;
- color: black;
- font-size:smaller;
- padding:0.5em;
- margin-bottom:5em;
- font-family:sans-serif, serif; }
-
-.big {font-size: 1.2em;}
-.small {font-size: 0.8em;}
-
-abbr[title] {
- text-decoration: none;
-}
-
- /* ]]> */ </style>
-</head>
-<body>
-<p style='text-align:center; font-size:1.2em; font-weight:bold'>The Project Gutenberg eBook of Newer ideals of peace, by Jane Addams</p>
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States and
-most other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no restrictions
-whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms
-of the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online
-at <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org">www.gutenberg.org</a>. If you
-are not located in the United States, you will have to check the laws of the
-country where you are located before using this eBook.
-</div>
-
-<p style='display:block; margin-top:1em; margin-bottom:1em; margin-left:2em; text-indent:-2em'>Title: Newer ideals of peace</p>
-<p style='display:block; margin-top:1em; margin-bottom:0; margin-left:2em; text-indent:-2em'>Author: Jane Addams</p>
-<p style='display:block; text-indent:0; margin:1em 0'>Release Date: January 26, 2023 [eBook #69879]</p>
-<p style='display:block; text-indent:0; margin:1em 0'>Language: English</p>
- <p style='display:block; margin-top:1em; margin-bottom:0; margin-left:2em; text-indent:-2em; text-align:left'>Produced by: Emmanuel Ackerman and the Online Distributed Proofreading Team at https://www.pgdp.net (This file was produced from images generously made available by The Internet Archive)</p>
-<div style='margin-top:2em; margin-bottom:4em'>*** START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK NEWER IDEALS OF PEACE ***</div>
-
-
-<p class="center big">
-THE CITIZEN’S LIBRARY<br>
-<br>
-<span class="small">OF</span><br><br>ECONOMICS, POLITICS, AND
-SOCIOLOGY</p>
-
-<p class="center p2">EDITED BY</p>
-
-<p class="center big">RICHARD T. ELY, <span class="smcap">Ph.D.</span>, LL.D.</p>
-
-<p class="center small">PROFESSOR OF POLITICAL ECONOMY,
-UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN</p>
-<hr class="r5">
-<p class="center big">NEWER IDEALS OF
-PEACE
-</p>
-
-
-<hr class="chap x-ebookmaker-drop">
-
-<div class="chapter">
-<h2 class="nobreak" id="THE_CITIZENS_LIBRARY_OF_ECONOMICS_POLITICS_AND_SOCIOLOGY">THE CITIZEN’S LIBRARY OF ECONOMICS, POLITICS, AND SOCIOLOGY</h2>
-</div>
-
-<p class="center">
-<i>12mo.</i>&#160; &#160; &#160; <i>Half Leather</i>&#160; &#160; &#160; <i>$1.25 net, each</i><br>
-</p>
-<hr class="tb">
-
-<div class="blockquot">
-
-<p><b>MONOPOLIES AND TRUSTS.</b> By <span class="smcap">Richard T. Ely, Ph.D.</span>, LL.D.</p>
-
-<p><b>THE ECONOMICS OF DISTRIBUTION.</b> By <span class="smcap">John A. Hobson</span>.</p>
-
-<p><b>WORLD POLITICS.</b> By <span class="smcap">Paul S. Reinsch, Ph.D.</span>, LL.B.</p>
-
-<p><b>ECONOMIC CRISES.</b> By <span class="smcap">Edward D. Jones, Ph.D.</span></p>
-
-<p><b>OUTLINES OF ECONOMICS.</b> By <span class="smcap">Richard T. Ely</span>.</p>
-
-<p><b>GOVERNMENT IN SWITZERLAND.</b> <span class="smcap">By John Martin Vincent,
-Ph.D.</span></p>
-
-<p><b>ESSAYS ON THE MONETARY HISTORY OF THE UNITED STATES.</b> By
-<span class="smcap">Charles J. Bullock, Ph.D.</span></p>
-
-<p><b>SOCIAL CONTROL.</b> By <span class="smcap">Edward A. Ross, Ph.D.</span></p>
-
-<p><b>HISTORY OF POLITICAL PARTIES IN THE UNITED STATES.</b> By <span class="smcap">Jesse
-Macy</span>, LL.D.</p>
-
-<p><b>MUNICIPAL ENGINEERING AND SANITATION.</b> By <span class="smcap">M. N. Baker,
-Ph.B.</span></p>
-
-<p><b>DEMOCRACY AND SOCIAL ETHICS.</b> By <span class="smcap">Jane Addams</span>, LL.D.</p>
-
-<p><b>COLONIAL GOVERNMENT.</b> By <span class="smcap">Paul S. Reinsch, Ph.D.</span>, LL.B.</p>
-
-<p><b>AMERICAN MUNICIPAL PROGRESS.</b> By <span class="smcap">Charles Zueblin</span>, B.D.</p>
-
-<p><b>IRRIGATION INSTITUTIONS.</b> By <span class="smcap">Elwood Mead</span>, C.E., M.S.</p>
-
-<p><b>RAILWAY LEGISLATION IN THE UNITED STATES.</b> By <span class="smcap">Balthasar H.
-Meyer, Ph.D.</span></p>
-
-<p><b>STUDIES IN THE EVOLUTION OF INDUSTRIAL SOCIETY.</b> By <span class="smcap">Richard
-T. Ely, Ph.D.</span>, LL.D.</p>
-
-<p><b>THE AMERICAN CITY.</b> By <span class="smcap">Delos F. Wilcox, Ph.D.</span></p>
-
-<p><b>MONEY.</b> By <span class="smcap">David Kinley, Ph.D.</span></p>
-
-<p><b>THE FOUNDATIONS OF SOCIOLOGY.</b> By <span class="smcap">Edward A. Ross</span>.</p>
-
-<p><b>THE ELEMENTS OF SOCIOLOGY.</b> By <span class="smcap">Frank W. Blackmar, Ph.D.</span></p>
-
-<p><b>COLONIAL ADMINISTRATION.</b> By <span class="smcap">Paul S. Reinsch, Ph.D.</span>,
-LL.B.</p>
-
-<p><b>AN INTRODUCTION TO THE STUDY OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS.</b> By
-<span class="smcap">Henry C. Taylor, M.S.Agr., Ph.D.</span></p>
-
-<p><b>SOME ETHICAL GAINS THROUGH LEGISLATION.</b> By <span class="smcap">Florence
-Kelley</span>.</p>
-
-<p><b>INTRODUCTION TO BUSINESS ORGANIZATION.</b> By <span class="smcap">Samuel E.
-Sparling, Ph.D.</span></p>
-
-<p><b>THE NEWER IDEALS OF PEACE.</b> By <span class="smcap">Jane Addams</span>, LL.D.</p>
-</div>
-
-<hr class="tb">
-<p class="center">
-<span class="big">THE MACMILLAN COMPANY</span><br>
-64-66 FIFTH AVENUE<br>
-NEW YORK<br>
-</p>
-
-
-
-<hr class="chap x-ebookmaker-drop">
-
-<div class="chapter">
-<p class="center big">
-<i>THE CITIZEN’S LIBRARY</i></p>
-<hr class="r5">
-<h1>Newer Ideals of Peace</h1>
-<p class="center p2">
-BY<br>
-<span class="big">JANE ADDAMS</span><br>
-<br>
-<span class="smcap">Hull-House, Chicago, Author of “Democracy and Social Ethics,” etc.</span><br>
-</p>
-<p class="center p4">
-New York<br>
-<span class="big">THE MACMILLAN COMPANY</span><br>
-LONDON: MACMILLAN &amp; CO., LTD.<br>
-1906<br>
-<span class="small"><i>All rights reserved</i></span><br>
-</p>
-
-
-
-</div>
-<hr class="chap x-ebookmaker-drop">
-
-<div class="chapter">
-
-
-<p class="center">
-Copyrighted 1906<br>
-By THE MACMILLAN COMPANY<br>
-</p><hr class="r5">
-<p class="center small">
-Set up, electrotyped. Printed December, 1906<br>
-</p>
-<p class="center p4">
-THE MASON-HENRY PRESS<br>
-<span class="smcap">Syracuse, New York</span><br>
-</p>
-
-
-
-</div>
-<hr class="chap x-ebookmaker-drop">
-
-<div class="chapter">
-<p class="center">
-TO<br>
-<span class="big">Hull-House</span><br>
-AND<br>
-<span class="big">its Neighbors</span><br>
-</p></div>
-<hr class="chap x-ebookmaker-drop">
-
-<div class="chapter">
-<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_vii">[Pg vii]</span></p>
-
-<h2 class="nobreak" id="PREFATORY_NOTE">PREFATORY NOTE</h2>
-</div>
-
-
-<p>These studies in the gradual development of the moral substitutes for
-war have been made in the industrial quarter of a cosmopolitan city
-where the morality exhibits marked social and international aspects.</p>
-
-<p>Parts of two chapters have been published before in the form of
-addresses, and two others as articles in the <i>North American
-Review</i> and in the <i>American Journal of Sociology</i>. All of
-them however are held together by a conviction that has been maturing
-through many years.</p>
-
-<p class="right">
-Hull-House,<br>
-<span style="margin-right: 1.5em;">Chicago.</span><br>
-</p>
-
-<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_viii">[Pg viii]</span></p>
-<hr class="chap x-ebookmaker-drop">
-
-<div class="chapter">
-<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_ix">[Pg ix]</span></p>
-
-<h2 class="nobreak" id="CONTENTS">CONTENTS</h2>
-</div>
-
-
-<table class="autotable">
-<tr><td colspan="2" class="tdc"><a href="#CHAPTER_I">CHAPTER I</a></td></tr>
-<tr><td colspan="2" class="tdc"><span class="smcap">Introduction</span></td></tr>
-<tr><td>Newer ideals of peace are dynamic; if made operative
- will do away with war as a natural process </td>
-<td class="tdr page"><a href="#Page_3">3</a></td></tr>
-<tr><td>Of the older ideals the appeal to pity is dogmatic </td>
-<td class="tdr page"><a href="#Page_4">4</a></td></tr>
-<tr><td>The appeal to the sense of prudence also dogmatic
- and at this moment seems impotent </td>
-<td class="tdr page"><a href="#Page_5">5</a></td></tr>
-<tr><td>Outlook for universal peace by international arbitration </td>
-<td class="tdr page"><a href="#Page_6">6</a></td></tr>
-<tr><td>Primitive and profound impulses operate against impulse
- to war </td>
-<td class="tdr page"><a href="#Page_8">8</a></td></tr>
-<tr><td>Appeal to pity and prudence unnecessary if the cosmopolitan
- interest in human affairs is utilized </td>
-<td class="tdr page"><a href="#Page_9">9</a></td></tr>
-<tr><td>Social morality originates in social affections </td>
-<td class="tdr page"><a href="#Page_11">11</a></td></tr>
-<tr><td>Emotion determines social relations in the poorer
- quarters of a cosmopolitan city </td>
-<td class="tdr page"><a href="#Page_13">13</a></td></tr>
-<tr><td>New immigrants develop phenomenal powers of association </td>
-<td class="tdr page"><a href="#Page_14">14</a></td></tr>
-<tr><td>Their ideal of government includes kindliness as
- well as protection </td>
-<td class="tdr page"><a href="#Page_15">15</a></td></tr>
-<tr><td>Crowded city quarters the focal point of governmental
- progress </td>
-<td class="tdr page"><a href="#Page_16">16</a></td></tr>
-<tr><td>Life at these points must shape itself with reference
- to the demands of social justice </td>
-<td class="tdr page"><a href="#Page_17">17</a></td></tr>
-<tr><td>Simple foundations laid there for an international
- order </td>
-<td class="tdr page"><a href="#Page_18">18</a></td></tr>
-<tr><td>Ideals formed “in the depth of anonymous life” make
- for realization </td>
-<td class="tdr page"><a href="#Page_20">20</a></td></tr>
-<tr><td>Impulses toward compassionate conduct imperative </td>
-<td class="tdr page"><a href="#Page_21">21</a></td></tr>
-<tr><td>The internationalism of good will foreseen by the
- philosopher </td>
-<td class="tdr page"><a href="#Page_23">23</a><span class="pagenum" id="Page_x">[Pg x]</span></td></tr>
-<tr><td>A quickening concern for human welfare; international
- aspects illustrated by world-wide efforts
- to eradicate tuberculosis, first signs of the substitution
- of nurture for warfare </td>
-<td class="tdr page"><a href="#Page_25">25</a></td></tr>
-<tr><td>This substitution will be a natural process </td>
-<td class="tdr page"><a href="#Page_26">26</a></td></tr>
-<tr><td>Our very hope for it, a surrender to the ideals of the
- humble </td>
-<td class="tdr page"><a href="#Page_27">27</a></td></tr>
-<tr><td>Accounting must be taken between survivals of militarism
- and manifestations of newer humanitarianism </td>
-<td class="tdr page"><a href="#Page_28">28</a></td></tr>
-<tr><td>Tendency to idealization marked eighteenth-century
- humanitarian </td>
-<td class="tdr page"><a href="#Page_29">29</a></td></tr>
-<tr><td>Newer ideals of this century sustained only by
- knowledge and companionship </td>
-<td class="tdr page"><a href="#Page_30">30</a></td></tr>
-<tr><td colspan="2" class="tdc"><a href="#CHAPTER_II">CHAPTER II</a></td></tr>
-<tr><td colspan="2" class="tdc"><span class="smcap">Survivals of Militarism in City Government</span></td></tr>
-<tr><td>American Republic founded under the influence of
- doctrinaire eighteenth-century ideals. Failure in
- municipal administration largely due to their inadequacy </td>
-<td class="tdr page"><a href="#Page_31">31</a></td></tr>
-<tr><td>Modern substitutes of the evolutionary conception of
- progress for eighteenth-century idealism </td>
-<td class="tdr page"><a href="#Page_32">32</a></td></tr>
-<tr><td>Failure of adjustment between the old form of government
- and present condition results in reversion
- to military and legal type </td>
-<td class="tdr page"><a href="#Page_34">34</a></td></tr>
-<tr><td>National governmental machinery provides no vehicle
- for organized expression of popular will </td>
-<td class="tdr page"><a href="#Page_35">35</a></td></tr>
-<tr><td>Historic governments dependent upon force of arms </td>
-<td class="tdr page"><a href="#Page_36">36</a></td></tr>
-<tr><td>Founders placed too exclusive a value upon the
- principles defended by the War of the Revolution.
- Example of the overestimation of the
- spoils of war </td>
-<td class="tdr page"><a href="#Page_37">37</a></td></tr>
-<tr><td>Immigration problem an illustration of the failure
- to treat our growing Republic in a spirit of progressive
- and developing democracy </td>
-<td class="tdr page"><a href="#Page_39">39</a></td></tr>
-<tr><td>Present immigration due partly to the philosophic
- dogmas of the eighteenth-century. Theory of
- naturalization still rests upon those dogmas </td>
-<td class="tdr page"><a href="#Page_40">40</a><span class="pagenum" id="Page_xi">[Pg xi]</span></td></tr>
-<tr><td>No adequate formulization of newer philosophy although
- immigration situation has become much
- more industrial than political </td>
-<td class="tdr page"><a href="#Page_42">42</a></td></tr>
-<tr><td>Exploitation of immigrants carried on under guise of
- preparation for citizenship </td>
-<td class="tdr page"><a href="#Page_46">46</a></td></tr>
-<tr><td>Failure to develop a government fitted to varied
- peoples </td>
-<td class="tdr page"><a href="#Page_48">48</a></td></tr>
-<tr><td>Attitude of contempt for immigrant survival of a
- spirit of conqueror toward inferior people </td>
-<td class="tdr page"><a href="#Page_49">49</a></td></tr>
-<tr><td>Contempt reflected by children toward immigrant
- parents </td>
-<td class="tdr page"><a href="#Page_50">50</a></td></tr>
-<tr><td>Universal franchise implies a recognition of social
- needs and ideals </td>
-<td class="tdr page"><a href="#Page_52">52</a></td></tr>
-<tr><td>Difficulties of administering repressive government in
- a democracy </td>
-<td class="tdr page"><a href="#Page_54">54</a></td></tr>
-<tr><td>The attempt inevitably develops the corrupt politician
- as a friend of the vicious </td>
-<td class="tdr page"><a href="#Page_56">56</a></td></tr>
-<tr><td>He must be followed by successive reformers who
- represent the righteous and protect tax interests </td>
-<td class="tdr page"><a href="#Page_57">57</a></td></tr>
-<tr><td>Illustration from the point of view of humble people </td>
-<td class="tdr page"><a href="#Page_58">58</a></td></tr>
-<tr><td>Dramatic see-saw must continue until we attain the
- ideals of an evolutionary democracy </td>
-<td class="tdr page"><a href="#Page_59">59</a></td></tr>
-<tr><td>Community divided into repressive and repressed,
- representing conqueror and conquered </td>
-<td class="tdr page"><a href="#Page_60">60</a></td></tr>
-<tr><td colspan="2" class="tdc"><a href="#CHAPTER_III">CHAPTER III</a></td></tr>
-<tr><td colspan="2" class="tdc"><span class="smcap">Failure to Utilize Immigrants in City Government</span></td></tr>
-<tr><td>Democratic governments must reckon with the unsuccessful
- if only because they represent majority
- of citizens </td>
-<td class="tdr page"><a href="#Page_62">62</a></td></tr>
-<tr><td>To demand protection from unsuccessful is to fail
- in self-government </td>
-<td class="tdr page"><a href="#Page_63">63</a></td></tr>
-<tr><td>Study of immigrants might develop result in revived
- enthusiasm for human possibilities reacting upon
- ideals of government </td>
-<td class="tdr page"><a href="#Page_64">64</a></td></tr>
-<tr><td>Social resources of immigrants wasted through want
- of recognition of old habits </td>
-<td class="tdr page"><a href="#Page_65">65</a><span class="pagenum" id="Page_xii">[Pg xii]</span></td></tr>
-<tr><td>Illustrated by South Italians’ ability to combine community
- life with agricultural occupations, which
- is disregarded </td>
-<td class="tdr page"><a href="#Page_66">66</a></td></tr>
-<tr><td>Anglo-Saxon distrust of experiments with land tenure
- and taxation illustrated by Doukhobors </td>
-<td class="tdr page"><a href="#Page_67">67</a></td></tr>
-<tr><td>Immigrant’s contribution to city life </td>
-<td class="tdr page"><a href="#Page_69">69</a></td></tr>
-<tr><td>Military ideals blind statesmen to connection between
- social life and government </td>
-<td class="tdr page"><a href="#Page_70">70</a></td></tr>
-<tr><td>Corrupt politician who sees the connection often first
- friend of immigrant </td>
-<td class="tdr page"><a href="#Page_71">71</a></td></tr>
-<tr><td>Real statesmen would work out scheme of naturalization
- founded upon social needs </td>
-<td class="tdr page"><a href="#Page_72">72</a></td></tr>
-<tr><td>Intelligent co-operation of immigrants necessary for
- advancing social legislation </td>
-<td class="tdr page"><a href="#Page_74">74</a></td></tr>
-<tr><td>Daily experience of immigrants not to be ignored as
- basis of patriotism </td>
-<td class="tdr page"><a href="#Page_75">75</a></td></tr>
-<tr><td>Lack of cosmopolitan standard widens gulf between
- immigrant parents and children </td>
-<td class="tdr page"><a href="#Page_78">78</a></td></tr>
-<tr><td>Government is developing most rapidly in its relation
- to the young criminal and to the poor and dependent </td>
-<td class="tdr page"><a href="#Page_79">79</a></td></tr>
-<tr><td>Denver Juvenile Court is significant in its attitude
- toward repressive government </td>
-<td class="tdr page"><a href="#Page_81">81</a></td></tr>
-<tr><td>Good education in reform schools indicates compunction
- on the part of the State </td>
-<td class="tdr page"><a href="#Page_83">83</a></td></tr>
-<tr><td>Government functions extended to care of defectives
- and dependents </td>
-<td class="tdr page"><a href="#Page_84">84</a></td></tr>
-<tr><td>Ignores normal needs of every citizen </td>
-<td class="tdr page"><a href="#Page_85">85</a></td></tr>
-<tr><td>Socialists would meet the needs of workingmen by
- socialized legislation, but refuse to deal with the
- present state </td>
-<td class="tdr page"><a href="#Page_86">86</a></td></tr>
-<tr><td>At present radical changes must come from forces
- outside life of the people </td>
-<td class="tdr page"><a href="#Page_87">87</a></td></tr>
-<tr><td>Imperial governments are now concerning themselves
- with primitive essential needs of workingmen </td>
-<td class="tdr page"><a href="#Page_88">88</a></td></tr>
-<tr><td>Republics restrict functions of the government </td>
-<td class="tdr page"><a href="#Page_90">90</a></td></tr>
-<tr><td>Is America, in clinging to eighteenth-century traditions,
- losing its belief in the average man? </td>
-<td class="tdr page"><a href="#Page_91">91</a><span class="pagenum" id="Page_xiii">[Pg xiii]</span></td></tr>
-<tr><td colspan="2" class="tdc"><a href="#CHAPTER_IV">CHAPTER IV</a></td></tr>
-<tr><td colspan="2" class="tdc"><span class="smcap">Militarism and Industrial Legislation</span></td></tr>
-<tr><td>American cities slow to consider immigration in relation
- to industry </td>
-<td class="tdr page"><a href="#Page_93">93</a></td></tr>
-<tr><td>Workingmen alone must regard them in relation
- to industrial situations </td>
-<td class="tdr page"><a href="#Page_94">94</a></td></tr>
-<tr><td>Assimilation of immigrants by workingman due both
- to economic pressure and to idealism </td>
-<td class="tdr page"><a href="#Page_95">95</a></td></tr>
-<tr><td>Illustrated by Stock Yards Strike </td>
-<td class="tdr page"><a href="#Page_96">96</a></td></tr>
-<tr><td>And by the strike in Anthracite Coal Fields </td>
-<td class="tdr page"><a href="#Page_97">97</a></td></tr>
-<tr><td>In the latter aroused public opinion forced Federal
- Government to deal with industrial conditions </td>
-<td class="tdr page"><a href="#Page_98">98</a></td></tr>
-<tr><td>In complicated modern society not always easy to
- see where social order lies </td>
-<td class="tdr page"><a href="#Page_101">101</a></td></tr>
-<tr><td>Chicago Stock Yards Strike illustrates such a situation </td>
-<td class="tdr page"><a href="#Page_104">104</a></td></tr>
-<tr><td>Government should have gained the enthusiasm immigrants
- gave to union </td>
-<td class="tdr page"><a href="#Page_107">107</a></td></tr>
-<tr><td>War element an essential part of strike </td>
-<td class="tdr page"><a href="#Page_109">109</a></td></tr>
-<tr><td>Appeal to loyalty the nearest approach to a moral
- appeal </td>
-<td class="tdr page"><a href="#Page_110">110</a></td></tr>
-<tr><td>Reluctance of United States Government to recognize
- matters of industry as germane to government </td>
-<td class="tdr page"><a href="#Page_112">112</a></td></tr>
-<tr><td>Resulting neglect of civic duty </td>
-<td class="tdr page"><a href="#Page_113">113</a></td></tr>
-<tr><td>The workingman’s attitude toward war as expressed
- by his international organization </td>
-<td class="tdr page"><a href="#Page_114">114</a></td></tr>
-<tr><td>Commerce the modern representative of conquest </td>
-<td class="tdr page"><a href="#Page_116">116</a></td></tr>
-<tr><td>Standard of life should be the test of a nation’s prosperity,
- so recognized by workingmen </td>
-<td class="tdr page"><a href="#Page_117">117</a></td></tr>
-<tr><td>Social amelioration undertaken by those in closest
- contact with social maladjustments </td>
-<td class="tdr page"><a href="#Page_118">118</a></td></tr>
-<tr><td>Present difficulties in social reform will continue
- until class interests are subordinated to a broader
- conception of social progress </td>
-<td class="tdr page"><a href="#Page_119">119</a></td></tr>
-<tr><td>If self-government were inaugurated by advanced
- thinkers now, they would make research into
- early forms of industrial governments </td>
-<td class="tdr page"><a href="#Page_121">121</a><span class="pagenum" id="Page_xiv">[Pg xiv]</span></td></tr>
-<tr><td>Autocratic European governments have recognized
- workingman’s need of protection </td>
-<td class="tdr page"><a href="#Page_122">122</a></td></tr>
-<tr><td>Has Democracy a right to refuse this protection? </td>
-<td class="tdr page"><a href="#Page_123">123</a></td></tr>
-<tr><td colspan="2" class="tdc"><a href="#CHAPTER_V">CHAPTER V</a></td></tr>
-<tr><td colspan="2" class="tdc"><span class="smcap">Group Morality in the Labor Movement</span></td></tr>
-<tr><td>Industrial changes which belong to the community
- as a whole have unfortunately divided it into
- two camps </td>
-<td class="tdr page"><a href="#Page_124">124</a></td></tr>
-<tr><td>These are typified by Employers’ Associations and
- Trades Unions each developing a group morality </td>
-<td class="tdr page"><a href="#Page_125">125</a></td></tr>
-<tr><td>Trade Unions at present illustrate the eternal compromise
- between the inner concept and the outer
- act </td>
-<td class="tdr page"><a href="#Page_127">127</a></td></tr>
-<tr><td>Present moment one of crisis in Trades Union development </td>
-<td class="tdr page"><a href="#Page_128">128</a></td></tr>
-<tr><td>Newly organized unions in war state of development
- responsible for serious mistakes </td>
-<td class="tdr page"><a href="#Page_130">130</a></td></tr>
-<tr><td>Tacit admission that a strike is war made during the
- Teamsters’ Strike in Chicago in 1905 </td>
-<td class="tdr page"><a href="#Page_132">132</a></td></tr>
-<tr><td>Temporary loss of belief in industrial arbitration </td>
-<td class="tdr page"><a href="#Page_134">134</a></td></tr>
-<tr><td>Teamsters’ Strike not adjudicated in court threw the
- entire city into state of warfare </td>
-<td class="tdr page"><a href="#Page_136">136</a></td></tr>
-<tr><td>New organizations of employers exhibit traits
- of militant youth </td>
-<td class="tdr page"><a href="#Page_138">138</a></td></tr>
-<tr><td>Public although powerless to intervene, sees grave
- social consequences </td>
-<td class="tdr page"><a href="#Page_140">140</a></td></tr>
-<tr><td>Division of community into classes; increase of race
- animosity; spirit of materialism </td>
-<td class="tdr page"><a href="#Page_141">141</a></td></tr>
-<tr><td>Class prejudice created among children still another
- social consequence </td>
-<td class="tdr page"><a href="#Page_142">142</a></td></tr>
-<tr><td>Disastrous effect of prolonged warfare upon the
- labor movement itself </td>
-<td class="tdr page"><a href="#Page_144">144</a></td></tr>
-<tr><td>Real effort of trades unions at present is for recognition
- of the principle of collective bargaining </td>
-<td class="tdr page"><a href="#Page_145">145</a></td></tr>
-<tr><td>Trades unions are forced to correct industrial ills
- inherent in the factory system itself </td>
-<td class="tdr page"><a href="#Page_146">146</a></td></tr>
-<tr><td>Illustration from limitation of output </td>
-<td class="tdr page"><a href="#Page_147">147</a><span class="pagenum" id="Page_xv">[Pg xv]</span></td></tr>
-<tr><td>Illustration from attitude towards improved machinery </td>
-<td class="tdr page"><a href="#Page_148">148</a></td></tr>
-<tr><td>Disregard of the machine as a social product makes
- for group morality on the part of the owner and
- employees </td>
-<td class="tdr page"><a href="#Page_149">149</a></td></tr>
-<tr><td>Contempt resulting from group morality justifies
- method of warfare </td>
-<td class="tdr page"><a href="#Page_150">150</a></td></tr>
-<tr><td colspan="2" class="tdc"><a href="#CHAPTER_VI">CHAPTER VI</a></td></tr>
-<tr><td colspan="2" class="tdc"><span class="smcap">Protection of Children for Industrial Efficiency</span></td></tr>
-<tr><td>Deficiency in protective legislation </td>
-<td class="tdr page"><a href="#Page_151">151</a></td></tr>
-<tr><td>Contempt for immigrant because of his economic
- standing </td>
-<td class="tdr page"><a href="#Page_152">152</a></td></tr>
-<tr><td>National indifference to condition of working children </td>
-<td class="tdr page"><a href="#Page_154">154</a></td></tr>
-<tr><td>Temptation to use child labor peculiar to this industrial
- epoch </td>
-<td class="tdr page"><a href="#Page_155">155</a></td></tr>
-<tr><td>Our sensibilities deadened by familiarity </td>
-<td class="tdr page"><a href="#Page_155">155</a></td></tr>
-<tr><td>Protection of the young the concern of government </td>
-<td class="tdr page"><a href="#Page_156">156</a></td></tr>
-<tr><td>Effect of premature labor on the child </td>
-<td class="tdr page"><a href="#Page_158">158</a></td></tr>
-<tr><td>Effect of child labor on the family </td>
-<td class="tdr page"><a href="#Page_161">161</a></td></tr>
-<tr><td>Effect on the industrial product </td>
-<td class="tdr page"><a href="#Page_162">162</a></td></tr>
-<tr><td>Effect on civilization </td>
-<td class="tdr page"><a href="#Page_163">163</a></td></tr>
-<tr><td>Intelligent labor the most valuable asset of our industrial
- prosperity </td>
-<td class="tdr page"><a href="#Page_164">164</a></td></tr>
-<tr><td>Results of England’s foreign commercial policy </td>
-<td class="tdr page"><a href="#Page_165">165</a></td></tr>
-<tr><td>Lack of consistency in the relation of the state to the
- child in the United States </td>
-<td class="tdr page"><a href="#Page_166">166</a></td></tr>
-<tr><td>Failure of public school system to connect with
- present industrial development </td>
-<td class="tdr page"><a href="#Page_167">167</a></td></tr>
-<tr><td>Correlation of new education with industrial situation </td>
-<td class="tdr page"><a href="#Page_168">168</a></td></tr>
-<tr><td>Child labor legislation will secure to child its proper
- play period </td>
-<td class="tdr page"><a href="#Page_169">169</a></td></tr>
-<tr><td>Power of association developed through play </td>
-<td class="tdr page"><a href="#Page_171">171</a></td></tr>
-<tr><td>Co-operation, not coercion, the ideal factory discipline </td>
-<td class="tdr page"><a href="#Page_173">173</a></td></tr>
-<tr><td>Actual factory system divorced from the instinct of
- workmanship </td>
-<td class="tdr page"><a href="#Page_174">174</a></td></tr>
-<tr><td>The activity of youth should be valuable assets for
- citizenship as well as industry </td>
-<td class="tdr page"><a href="#Page_175">175<span class="pagenum" id="Page_xvi">[Pg xvi]</span></a></td></tr>
-<tr><td>Military survivals in city government destroys this
- asset </td>
-<td class="tdr page"><a href="#Page_176">176</a></td></tr>
-<tr><td>The gang a training school for group morality </td>
-<td class="tdr page"><a href="#Page_177">177</a></td></tr>
-<tr><td>Concern of modern government in the development
- of its citizens </td>
-<td class="tdr page"><a href="#Page_179">179</a></td></tr>
-<tr><td colspan="2" class="tdc"><a href="#CHAPTER_VII">CHAPTER VII</a></td></tr>
-<tr><td colspan="2" class="tdc"><span class="smcap">Utilization of Women in City Government</span></td></tr>
-<tr><td>The modern city founded upon military ideals </td>
-<td class="tdr page"><a href="#Page_180">180</a></td></tr>
-<tr><td>Early franchise justly given to grown men on basis
- of military duty </td>
-<td class="tdr page"><a href="#Page_181">181</a></td></tr>
-<tr><td>This early test no longer fitted to the modern city
- whose problems are internal </td>
-<td class="tdr page"><a href="#Page_182">182</a></td></tr>
-<tr><td>Women’s experience in household details valuable to
- civic housekeeping. No method of making it
- available </td>
-<td class="tdr page"><a href="#Page_184">184</a></td></tr>
-<tr><td>Municipal suffrage to be regarded not as a right or a
- privilege, but as a piece of governmental machinery </td>
-<td class="tdr page"><a href="#Page_187">187</a></td></tr>
-<tr><td>Franchise not only valuable as exercised by educated
- women, matters to be decided upon too basic
- to be influenced by modern education </td>
-<td class="tdr page"><a href="#Page_188">188</a></td></tr>
-<tr><td>Census of 1900 shows greater increase of workingwomen
- than of men and increasing youth of
- working women </td>
-<td class="tdr page"><a href="#Page_189">189</a></td></tr>
-<tr><td>Concerted action of women necessary to bring about
- industrial protection </td>
-<td class="tdr page"><a href="#Page_191">191</a></td></tr>
-<tr><td>Women can control surroundings of their work only
- by means of franchise </td>
-<td class="tdr page"><a href="#Page_192">192</a></td></tr>
-<tr><td>Unfair to put task of industrial protection upon
- women’s trades unions as it often confuses issues </td>
-<td class="tdr page"><a href="#Page_194">194</a></td></tr>
-<tr><td>Closer connection between industry and government
- would result if working women were enfranchised </td>
-<td class="tdr page"><a href="#Page_196">196</a></td></tr>
-<tr><td>Failure to educate women to industrial life disastrous
- to industry itself and to women as employers </td>
-<td class="tdr page"><a href="#Page_197">197</a></td></tr>
-<tr><td>Situation must be viewed in relation to recent immigration
- and in connection with present stage
- of factory system in America </td>
-<td class="tdr page"><a href="#Page_199">199</a></td></tr>
-</table><p>
-<span class="pagenum" id="Page_1">[Pg 1]</span><span class="pagenum" id="Page_2">[Pg 2]</span>
-</p>
-<hr class="chap x-ebookmaker-drop">
-
-<div class="chapter">
-<h2 class="nobreak" id="NEWER_IDEALS_OF_PEACE">NEWER IDEALS OF PEACE</h2>
-</div>
-<span class="pagenum" id="Page_3">[Pg 3]</span>
-
-<hr class="chap x-ebookmaker-drop">
-
-<div class="chapter">
-<h2 class="nobreak" id="CHAPTER_I">CHAPTER I<br><span class="small">INTRODUCTION</span></h2></div>
-
-
-<p>The following pages present the claims of the newer, more aggressive
-ideals of peace, as over against the older dovelike ideal. These newer
-ideals are active and dynamic, and it is believed that if their forces
-were made really operative upon society, they would, in the end, quite
-as a natural process, do away with war. The older ideals have required
-fostering and recruiting, and have been held and promulgated on the
-basis of a creed. Their propaganda has been carried forward during the
-last century in nearly all civilized countries by a small body of men
-who have never ceased to cry out against war and its iniquities and who
-have preached the doctrines of peace along two great lines. The first
-has been the appeal to the higher imaginative pity, as it is found in
-the modern, moralized man. This line has been most effectively followed
-by two Russians, Count Tolstoy in his earlier writings and Verestchagin
-in his paintings. With his relentless power of reducing all life to
-personal<span class="pagenum" id="Page_4">[Pg 4]</span> experience Count Tolstoy drags us through the campaign of
-the common soldier in its sordidness and meanness and constant sense
-of perplexity. We see nothing of the glories we have associated with
-warfare, but learn of it as it appears to the untutored peasant who
-goes forth at the mandate of his superior to suffer hunger, cold, and
-death for issues which he does not understand, which, indeed, can have
-no moral significance to him. Verestchagin covers his canvas with
-thousands of wretched wounded and neglected dead, with the waste,
-cruelty, and squalor of war, until he forces us to question whether a
-moral issue can ever be subserved by such brutal methods.</p>
-
-<p>High and searching as is the preaching of these two great Russians who
-hold their art of no account save as it serves moral ends, it is still
-the appeal of dogma, and may be reduced to a command to cease from
-evil. And when this same line of appeal is presented by less gifted
-men, it often results in mere sentimentality, totally unenforced by a
-call to righteousness.</p>
-
-<p>The second line followed by the advocates of peace in all countries has
-been the appeal to the sense of prudence, and this again has found its
-ablest exponent in a Russian subject, the economist and banker, Jean de
-Bloch. He sets forth the cost of warfare with pitiless accuracy, and<span class="pagenum" id="Page_5">[Pg 5]</span>
-demonstrates that even the present armed peace is so costly that the
-burdens of it threaten social revolution in almost every country in
-Europe. Long before the reader comes to the end of de Bloch’s elaborate
-computation he is ready to cry out on the inanity of the proposition
-that the only way to secure eternal peace is to waste so much valuable
-energy and treasure in preparing for war that war becomes impossible.
-Certainly no theory could be devised which is more cumbersome, more
-roundabout, more extravagant, than the <i>reductio ad absurdum</i> of
-the peace-secured-by-the-preparation-for-war theory. This appeal to
-prudence was constantly emphasized at the first Hague Conference and
-was shortly afterward demonstrated by Great Britain when she went to
-war in South Africa, where she was fined one hundred million pounds
-and lost ten thousand lives. The fact that Russia also, and the very
-Czar who invited the Conference, disregarded the conclusions of the
-Hague Tribunal makes this line of appeal at least for the moment seem
-impotent to influence empires which command enormous resources and
-which lodge the power of expenditure in officials who have nothing to
-do with accumulating the treasure they vote to expend.</p>
-
-<p>It would, however, be the height of folly for<span class="pagenum" id="Page_6">[Pg 6]</span> responsible statesmen
-to ignore the sane methods of international discussion and concession
-which have been evolved largely as a result of these appeals. The
-Interparliamentary Union for International Arbitration and the
-Institute of International Law represent the untiring efforts of the
-advocates of peace through many years. Nevertheless universal peace,
-viewed from the point of the World’s Sovereignty or of the Counsel of
-Nations, is discouraging even when stated by the most ardent promoters
-of the peace society. Here it is quite possible that the mistake is
-being repeated which the old annalists of history made when they
-never failed to chronicle the wars and calamities which harassed
-their contemporaries, although, while the few indulged in fighting,
-the mass of them peacefully prosecuted their daily toil and followed
-their own conceptions of kindliness and equity. An English writer<a id="FNanchor_1" href="#Footnote_1" class="fnanchor">[1]</a>
-has recently bidden us to look at the actual state of affairs existing
-at the present moment. He says, “Universal and permanent peace may be
-a vision; but the gradual change whereby war, as a normal state of
-international relations, has given place to peace as the normal state,
-is no vision, but an actual process of history palpably forwarded in
-our own day by the development of international<span class="pagenum" id="Page_7">[Pg 7]</span> law and of morals,
-and voluntary arbitration based thereon.” He insists that it is the
-function of international lawyers merely to give coherent expression
-to the best principles which the common moral sense of civilized
-Governments recognizes; in other words, that international law should
-be like primitive law within the nation, a formal expression of custom
-resting on the sense of a reciprocal restraint which has been found to
-be necessary for the common good.</p>
-
-<p>Assuming that the two lines of appeal—the one to sensibility and the
-other to prudence—will persist, and that the international lawyers, in
-spite of the fact that they have no court before which to plead and no
-executive to enforce their findings, will continue to formulate into
-codes the growing moral sense of the nations, the following pages hope
-not only to make clear the contention that these forces within society
-are so dynamic and vigorous that the impulses to war seem by comparison
-cumbersome and mechanical, but also to point out the development of
-those newer social forces which it is believed will at last prove a
-“sovereign intervention” by extinguishing the possibility of battle at
-its very source.</p>
-
-<p>It is difficult to formulate the newer dynamic peace, embodying the
-later humanism, as over against the old dogmatic peace. The word<span class="pagenum" id="Page_8">[Pg 8]</span>
-“non-resistance” is misleading, because it is much too feeble and
-inadequate. It suggests passivity, the goody-goody attitude of
-ineffectiveness. The words “overcoming,” “substituting,” “re-creating,”
-“readjusting moral values,” “forming new centres of spiritual energy”
-carry much more of the meaning implied. For it is not merely the desire
-for a conscience at rest, for a sense of justice no longer outraged,
-that would pull us into new paths where there would be no more war nor
-preparations for war. There are still more strenuous forces at work
-reaching down to impulses and experiences as primitive and profound
-as are those of struggle itself. That “ancient kindliness which sat
-beside the cradle of the race,” and which is ever ready to assert
-itself against ambition and greed and the desire for achievement, is
-manifesting itself now with unusual force, and for the first time
-presents international aspects.</p>
-
-<p>Moralists agree that it is not so much by the teaching of moral
-theorems that virtue is to be promoted as by the direct expression of
-social sentiments and by the cultivation of practical habits; that in
-the progress of society sentiments and opinions have come first, then
-habits of action and lastly moral codes and institutions. Little is
-gained by creating the latter prematurely, but much may be accomplished
-to the utilization of<span class="pagenum" id="Page_9">[Pg 9]</span> human interests and affections. The Advocates
-of Peace would find the appeal both to Pity and Prudence totally
-unnecessary, could they utilize the cosmopolitan interest in human
-affairs with the resultant social sympathy that at the present moment
-is developing among all the nations of the earth.</p>
-
-<p>By way of illustration, I may be permitted to cite the London showman
-who used to exhibit two skulls of Shakespeare—one when he was a youth
-and went poaching, another when he was a man and wrote plays. There
-was such a striking difference between the roystering boy indulging in
-illicit sport and the mature man who peopled the London stage with all
-the world, that the showman grew confused and considered two separate
-acts of creation less improbable than that such an amazing change
-should have taken place. We can easily imagine the gifted youth in the
-little group of rustics at Stratford-on-Avon finding no adequate outlet
-for his powers save in a series of break-neck adventures. His only
-alternative was to sit by the fire with the village cronies, drinking
-ale so long as his shillings held out. But if we follow him up to
-London, through all the charm and wonder of the stage which represented
-his unfolding mind, if we can imagine his delight as he gradually
-gained the freedom, not<span class="pagenum" id="Page_10">[Pg 10]</span> only of that big town, but of the human city
-as well, we can easily see that illicit sport could no longer attract
-him. To have told the great dramatist the night Hamlet first stepped
-upon the boards that it was a wicked thing to poach, to have cautioned
-him that he must consider the cost of preserving the forest and of
-raising the deer, or to have made an appeal to his pity on behalf of
-the wounded creatures, would have been the height of folly, because
-totally unnecessary. All desire, almost all memory of those days, had
-dropped from him, through his absorption in the great and exciting
-drama of life. His effort to understand it, to portray it, had utilized
-and drained his every power. It is equally true of our contemporaries,
-as it was of the great play-wright, that the attainment of this
-all-absorbing passion for multiform life, with the desire to understand
-its mysteries and to free its capacities, is gradually displacing the
-juvenile propensities to warfare.</p>
-
-<p>From this standpoint the advocates of the newer Ideals of Peace would
-have little to do but to insist that the social point of view be kept
-paramount, realizing at the same time that the social sentiments are as
-blind as the egoistic sentiments and must be enlightened, disciplined
-and directed by the fullest knowledge. The modern students<span class="pagenum" id="Page_11">[Pg 11]</span> of human
-morality have told us that primitive man, by the very necessities of
-his hard struggle for life, came at last to identify his own existence
-with that of his tribe. Tribal life then made room within itself for
-the development of that compassion which is the first step towards
-sensibility and higher moral sentiment. If we accept this statement
-then we must assume that the new social morality, which we so sadly
-need, will of necessity have its origin in the social affections—we
-must search in the dim borderland between compassion and morality for
-the beginnings of that cosmopolitan affection, as it is prematurely
-called.</p>
-
-<p>The life of the tribal man inevitably divided into two sets of actions,
-which appeared under two different ethical aspects: the relation within
-the tribe and the relation with outsiders, the double conception of
-morality maintaining itself until now. But the tribal law differed no
-more widely from inter-tribal law than our common law does from our
-international law. Until society manages to combine the two we shall
-make no headway toward the Newer Ideals of Peace.</p>
-
-<p>If we would institute an intelligent search for the social conditions
-which make possible this combination we should naturally seek for
-them in the poorer quarters of a cosmopolitan city where<span class="pagenum" id="Page_12">[Pg 12]</span> we have, as
-nowhere else, the conditions for breaking into this double development;
-for making a fresh start, as it were, toward a synthesis upon a higher
-moral line which shall include both. There is every opportunity and
-necessity for compassion and kindliness such as the tribe itself
-afforded, and there is in addition, because of the many nationalities
-which are gathered there from all parts of the world, the opportunity
-and necessity for breaking through the tribal bond. Early associations
-and affections were not based so much on ties of blood as upon that
-necessity for defense against the hostile world outside which made the
-life of every man in a tribe valuable to every other man. The fact
-of blood was, so to speak, an accident. The moral code grew out of
-solidarity of emotion and action essential to the life of all.</p>
-
-<p>In the midst of the modern city which, at moments, seems to stand
-only for the triumph of the strongest, the successful exploitation
-of the weak, the ruthlessness and hidden crime which follow in the
-wake of the struggle for existence on its lowest terms, there come
-daily—at least to American cities—accretions of simple people, who
-carry in their hearts a desire for mere goodness. They regularly
-deplete their scanty livelihood in response to a primitive pity, and,
-independent of the religions they have professed,<span class="pagenum" id="Page_13">[Pg 13]</span> of the wrongs they
-have suffered, and of the fixed morality they have been taught, have
-an unquenchable desire that charity and simple justice shall regulate
-men’s relations. It seems sometimes, to one who knows them, as if they
-continually sought for an outlet for more kindliness, and that they are
-not only willing and eager to do a favor for a friend, but that their
-kindheartedness lies in ambush, as it were, for a chance to incorporate
-itself in our larger relations, that they persistently expect that
-it shall be given some form of governmental expression. This is
-doubtless due partly to the fact that emotional pity and kindness are
-always found in greatest degree among the unsuccessful. We are told
-that unsuccessful struggle breeds emotion, not strength; that the
-hard-pressed races are the emotional races; and that wherever struggle
-has long prevailed emotion becomes the dominant force in fixing social
-relations. Is it surprising, therefore, that among this huge mass of
-the unsuccessful, to be found in certain quarters of the modern city,
-we should have the “medium,” in which the first growth of the new
-compassion is taking place?</p>
-
-<p>In addition to this compassion always found among the unsuccessful,
-emotional sentiment runs high among the newly arrived immigrants
-as a result of the emotional experiences of parting<span class="pagenum" id="Page_14">[Pg 14]</span> from home and
-kindred, to which he has been so recently subjected. An unusual mental
-alertness and power of perception also results from the upheaval. The
-multitudes of immigrants flooding the American cities have many times
-sundered social habits cherished through a hundred generations, and
-have renounced customs that may be traced to the habits of primitive
-man. These old habits and customs have a much more powerful hold than
-have mere racial or national ties. In seeking companionship in the new
-world, all the immigrants are reduced to the fundamental equalities and
-universal necessities of human life itself, and they inevitably develop
-the power of association which comes from daily contact with those who
-are unlike each other in all save the universal characteristics of man.</p>
-
-<p>When looked at too closely, this nascent morality disappears, and one
-can count over only a thousand kindly acts and neighborly offices. But
-when meditated upon in the whole, there at once emerge again those vast
-and dominant suggestions of a new peace and holiness. It would seem as
-if our final help and healing were about to issue forth from broken
-human nature itself, out of the pathetic striving of ordinary men, who
-make up the common substance of life: from those who have been driven
-by economic pressure or<span class="pagenum" id="Page_15">[Pg 15]</span> governmental oppression out of a score of
-nations.</p>
-
-<p>These various peoples who are gathered together in the immigrant
-quarters of a cosmopolitan city worship goodness for its own value,
-and do not associate it with success any more than they associate
-success with themselves; they literally “serve God for nought.”
-If we would adduce evidence that we are emerging from a period of
-industrialism into a period of humanitarianism, it is to such quarters
-that we must betake ourselves. These are the places in which it is
-easiest to study the newer manifestations of government, in which
-personal welfare is considered a legitimate object; for a new history
-of government begins with an attempt to make life possible and human
-in large cities, in those crowded quarters which exhibit such an
-undoubted tendency to barbarism and degeneracy when the better human
-qualities are not nourished. Public baths and gymnasiums, parks and
-libraries, are provided first for those who are without the security
-for bare subsistence, and it does not seem strange to them that it
-should be so. Such a community is made up of men who will continue to
-dream of Utopian Governments until the democratic government about
-them expresses kindliness with protection. Such men will continue to
-rely upon neighborly friendliness until organized<span class="pagenum" id="Page_16">[Pg 16]</span> charity is able
-to identify impulsive pity with well-considered relief. They will
-naïvely long for an education for their children that will fit them to
-earn money until public education shall come to consider industrial
-efficiency. As their hopes and dreams are a prophecy of the future
-development in city government, in charity, in education, so their
-daily lives are a forecast of coming international relations. Our
-attention has lately been drawn to the fact that it is logical that
-the most vigorous efforts in governmental reform, as well as the most
-generous experiments in ministering to social needs, have come from the
-larger cities and that it is inevitable that they should be to-day “the
-centers of radicalism,” as they have been traditionally the “cradles of
-liberty.”<a id="FNanchor_2" href="#Footnote_2" class="fnanchor">[2]</a></p>
-
-<p>If we once admit the human dynamic character of progress, then it is
-easy to understand why the crowded city quarters become focal points of
-that progress.</p>
-
-<p>A deeper and more thorough-going unity is required in a community
-made up of highly differentiated peoples than in a more settled and
-stratified one, and it may be logical that we should find in this
-commingling of many peoples a certain<span class="pagenum" id="Page_17">[Pg 17]</span> balance and concord of opposing
-and contending forces; a gravitation toward the universal. Because of
-their difference in all external matters, in all of the non-essentials
-of life, the people in a cosmopolitan city are forced to found their
-community of interests upon the basic and essential likenesses of their
-common human nature; for, after all, the things that make men alike
-are stronger and more primitive than the things that separate them. It
-is natural that this synthesis of the varying nations should be made
-first at the points of the greatest congestion, quite as we find that
-selfishness is first curbed and social feeling created at the points
-where the conflict of individual interests is sharpest. One dares not
-grow too certain as to the wells of moral healing which lie under the
-surface of the sullen work-driven life which the industrial quarters
-of the modern city present. They fascinate us by their mere size and
-diversity, as does the city itself; but certain it is, that these
-quarters continually confound us by their manifestations of altruism.
-It may be that we are surprised simply because we fail to comprehend
-that the individual, under such pressure, must shape his life with
-some reference to the demands of social justice, not only to avoid
-crushing the little folk about him, but in order to save himself from
-death by<span class="pagenum" id="Page_18">[Pg 18]</span> crushing. It is an instance of the irresistible coalescing
-of the altruistic and egoistic impulse which is the strength of social
-morality. We are often told that men under this pressure of life become
-calloused and cynical, whereas anyone who lives with them knows that
-they are sentimental and compassionate.</p>
-
-<p>It is possible that we shall be saved from warfare by the “fighting
-rabble” itself, by the “quarrelsome mob” turned into kindly citizens
-of the world through the pressure of a cosmopolitan neighborhood. It
-is not that they are shouting for peace—on the contrary, if they
-shout at all, they will continue to shout for war—but that they are
-really attaining cosmopolitan relations through daily experience.
-They will probably believe for a long time that war is noble and
-necessary both to engender and cherish patriotism; and yet all of the
-time, below their shouting, they are living in the kingdom of human
-kindness. They are laying the simple and inevitable foundations for an
-international order as the foundations of tribal and national morality
-have already been laid. They are developing the only sort of patriotism
-consistent with the intermingling of the nations; for the citizens of a
-cosmopolitan quarter find an insuperable difficulty when they attempt
-to hem in their conception of patriotism either to the “old<span class="pagenum" id="Page_19">[Pg 19]</span> country”
-or to their adopted one. There arises the hope that when this newer
-patriotism becomes large enough, it will overcome arbitrary boundaries
-and soak up the notion of nationalism. We may then give up war, because
-we shall find it as difficult to make war upon a nation at the other
-side of the globe as upon our next-door neighbor.</p>
-
-<p>These humble harbingers of the Newer Ideals of Peace, venturing
-themselves upon a larger relationship, are most touching; and while
-the success of their efforts can never be guaranteed or spoken of too
-confidently, they stir us with a strange hope, as if new vistas of life
-were opening before us—vistas not illuminated with the glare of war,
-but with a mellowed glow of their own. These paths are seen distinctly
-only as we ascend to a more enveloping point of view and obtain a
-larger and bulkier sense of the growing sentiment which rejects the old
-and negative bonds of discipline and coercion and insists upon vital
-and fraternal relationship, subordinating the lower to the higher.
-To make this hope valid and intelligible, is indeed the task before
-these humble brethren of ours and of those who would help them. They
-encourage us to hope for the discovery of a new vital relation—that
-of the individual to the race—which may lay the foundation<span class="pagenum" id="Page_20">[Pg 20]</span> for a new
-religious bond adequate to the modern situation; and we almost come
-to believe that such a foundation is, in fact, being laid now—not in
-speculation, but in action.</p>
-
-<p>That which secured for the early Hebrew shepherd his health, his peace
-of mind, and his sense of connection with the Unseen, became the
-basis for the most wonderful and widespread religion the world has
-ever known. Perhaps, at this moment, we need to find that which will
-secure the health, the peace of mind, and the opportunity for normal
-occupation and spiritual growth to the humblest industrial worker, as
-the foundation for a rational conduct of life adapted to an industrial
-and cosmopolitan era.</p>
-
-<p>Even now we only dimly comprehend the strength and irresistible power
-of those “universal and imperious ideals which are formed in the
-depths of anonymous life,” and which the people insist shall come to
-realization, not because they have been tested by logic or history,
-but because the mass of men are eager that they should be tried as
-a living experience. According to our different methods of viewing
-society, we express this newer ideal which is after all so old as to
-have been engendered in the tribe itself. He who makes the study of
-society a mere corollary of biology, speaks of the “theory of the
-unspecialized,”<span class="pagenum" id="Page_21">[Pg 21]</span> that the simple cell develops much more rapidly when
-new tissue is needed than the more highly developed one; he who views
-society from the economic standpoint and finds hope only in a changed
-industrial order, talks of the “man at the bottom of society,” of the
-proletarian who shall eventually come into his own; he who believes
-that a wiser and a saner education will cure our social ill, speaks
-ever and again of “the wisdom of the little child” and of the necessity
-to reveal and explore his capacity; while he who keeps close to the
-historic deductions upon which the study of society is chiefly founded,
-uses the old religious phrase, “the counsel of imperfection,” and bids
-us concern ourselves with “the least of these.”</p>
-
-<p>The French have a phrase <i>l’imperieuse bonté</i> by which they
-designate those impulses towards compassionate conduct which will
-not be denied, because they are as imperative in their demand for
-expression as is the impulse to make music or to soften life by poesy
-and decoration. According to this definition, St. Francis was a genius
-in exactly the same sense as was Dante or Raphael, and he revealed
-quite as they did, possibilities and reaches of the human soul hitherto
-unsuspected. This genius for goodness has in the past largely expressed
-itself through individuals<span class="pagenum" id="Page_22">[Pg 22]</span> and groups, but it may be that we are
-approaching a period which shall give it collective expression, and
-shall unite into one all those private and parochial efforts. It would
-be no more strange than was that marvelous coming together of the
-artists and the people in the thirteenth century which resulted in the
-building of the Gothic cathedrals. We may be waiting for a religious
-enthusiasm, for a divine fire to fuse together the partial and feeble
-efforts at “doing good” into a transfigured whole which shall take on
-international proportions as naturally as the cathedrals towered into
-unheard-of heights. The Gothic cathedrals were glorious beyond the
-dreams of artists, notwithstanding that they were built by unknown men,
-or rather by so many men that it was a matter of indifference to record
-their names. Could we compare the present humanitarian efforts to the
-building of a spiritual cathedral, it would seem that the gargoyles
-had been made first, that the ground is now strewn with efforts to “do
-good” which have developed a diabolical capacity for doing harm. But
-even these may fall into place. The old cathedral-builders fearlessly
-portrayed all of life, its inveterate tendency to deride as well as
-to bless; its trickery as well as its beauty. Their art was catholic
-enough to portray all, and the<span class="pagenum" id="Page_23">[Pg 23]</span> cathedral was huge enough to mellow all
-they portrayed into a flowing and inspired whole.</p>
-
-<p>At the present moment it requires the philosopher to unify these
-spiritual efforts of the common man into the internationalism of good
-will, as in the past it was natural that the philosophers, the men
-who looked at life as a whole, should have been the first to sigh for
-negative peace which they declared would be “eternal.”</p>
-
-<p>Speculative writers, such as Kant, Bentham, and Buckle, long ago
-pointed out that the subsidence of war was inevitable as society
-progressed. They contended that every stage of human progress is marked
-by a further curtailment of brute force, a limitation of the area in
-which it is permitted. At the bottom is the small savage community in
-a perpetual state of warfare; at the top an orderly society stimulated
-and controlled by recognized ideals of social justice. In proportion
-as the savage society comes under the dominion of a common moral
-consciousness, it moves up, and in proportion as the civilized society
-reverts to the use of brute force, it goes down. Reversion to that
-brute struggle may at any moment cost the destruction of the painfully
-acquired bonds of equity, the ties of mutual principle, which are
-wrought with such effort and loosed with such ease. But these earlier<span class="pagenum" id="Page_24">[Pg 24]</span>
-philosophers could not possibly have foreseen the tremendous growth
-of industry and commerce with their inevitable cosmopolitanism which
-has so recently taken place, nor without knowledge of this could they
-possibly have prognosticated the leap forward and the aggressive
-character which the concern for human welfare has latterly evinced.
-The speculative writers among our contemporaries are naturally the
-only ones who formulate this new development, or rather bid us heed
-its presence among us. An American philosopher<a id="FNanchor_3" href="#Footnote_3" class="fnanchor">[3]</a> has lately reminded
-us of the need to “discover in the social realm the moral equivalent
-for war—something heroic that will speak to men as universally as war
-has done, and yet will be as compatible with their spiritual natures
-as war has proved itself to be incompatible.” It may be true that we
-are even now discovering these moral substitutes, although we find
-it so difficult to formulate them. Perhaps our very hope that these
-substitutes may be discovered has become the custodian of a secret
-change that is going on all about us. We care less each day for the
-heroism connected with warfare and destruction, and constantly admire
-more that which pertains to labor and the nourishing of human life.
-The new<span class="pagenum" id="Page_25">[Pg 25]</span> heroism manifests itself at the present moment in a universal
-determination to abolish poverty and disease, a manifestation so
-widespread that it may justly be called international.</p>
-
-<p>In illustration of this new determination one immediately thinks of
-the international effort to rid the face of the earth of tuberculosis,
-in which Germany, Italy, France, England and America are engaged with
-such enthusiasm. This movement has its international congresses,
-its discoverers and veterans, also its decorations and rewards for
-bravery. Its discipline is severe; it requires self-control, endurance,
-self-sacrifice and constant watchfulness. Its leaders devote hours to
-careful teaching and demonstration, they reclaim acres of bad houses,
-and make over the food supply of huge cities. One could instance
-the determination to do away with neglected old age, which finds
-expression in the Old Age Pension Acts of Germany and Australia, in the
-State Savings Banks of Belgium and France, in the enormous number of
-Mutual Benefit Societies in England and America. In such undertakings
-as these, with their spontaneous and universal manifestations, are
-we beginning to see the first timid forward reach of one of those
-instinctive movements which carry onward the progressive goodness of
-the race.</p>
-
-<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_26">[Pg 26]</span></p>
-
-<p>It is possible that this substitution of nurture for warfare is
-analogous to that world-wide effort to put a limit to revenge which
-one nation after another essayed as each reached a certain stage of
-development. To compel the avenger to accept blood-money in lieu of
-the blood of his enemy may have been but a short step in morals,
-but at least it destroyed the stimulus to further shedding of blood
-which each avenged death had afforded, and it laid the foundations
-for court adjudications. The newer humanitarianism is more aggressive
-and substitutes emotional stimuli as well as codes of conduct. We may
-predict that each nation quite as a natural process will reach the
-moment when virile good-will will be substituted for the spirit of
-warfare. The process of extinguishing war, however, compared to the
-limiting of revenge, will be amazingly accelerated. Owing to the modern
-conditions of intercourse, each nation will respond, not to an isolated
-impulse, but will be caught in the current of a world-wide process.</p>
-
-<p>We are much too timid and apologetic in regard to this newer
-humanitarianism, and do not yet realize what it may do for us in
-the way of courage and endurance. We continue to defend war on the
-ground that it stirs the nobler blood and the higher imagination of
-the nation, and<span class="pagenum" id="Page_27">[Pg 27]</span> thus frees it from moral stagnation and the bonds
-of commercialism. We do not see that this is to borrow our virtues
-from a former age and to fail to utilize our own. We find ourselves
-in this plight because our modern morality has lacked fibre, because
-our humanitarianism has been much too soft and literary, and has given
-itself over to unreal and high-sounding phrases. It appears that our
-only hope for a genuine adjustment of our morality and courage to our
-present social and industrial developments, lies in a patient effort
-to work it out by daily experience. We must be willing to surrender
-ourselves to those ideals of the humble, which all religious teachers
-unite in declaring to be the foundations of a sincere moral life.</p>
-
-<p>The following pages attempt to uncover these newer ideals as we may
-daily experience them in the modern city. It may be found that certain
-survivals of militarism in municipal government are responsible for
-much of the failure in the working of democratic institutions. We may
-discover that the survivals of warfare in the labor movement and all
-the other dangers of class morality rest largely upon an appeal to
-loyalties which are essentially a survival of the virtues of a warlike
-period. The more aggressive aspects of the newer humanitarianism may be
-traced in<span class="pagenum" id="Page_28">[Pg 28]</span> the movement for social amelioration and in the protective
-legislation which regards the weakest citizen as a valuable asset.
-The same spirit which protests against the social waste of child
-labor also demands that the traditional activity of woman shall be
-utilized in civic life. When the State protects its civic resources,
-as it formerly defended its citizens in time of war, industrialism
-versus militarism comes to be nurture versus conquest. In order to
-trace the displacement of the military ideals of patriotism by those
-of a rising concern for human welfare, we must take an accounting
-between those forms of governmental machinery and social organization
-which are the historic outgrowth of conquest and repression and the
-newer forms arising in their midst which embody the social energy
-instantly recognizable as contemporaneous with our sincerest moral
-life. To follow this newer humanitarianism even through its obvious
-manifestations requires at the very outset a definite abandonment of
-the eighteenth-century philosophy upon which so much of our present
-democratic theory and philanthropic activity depends. It is necessary
-from the very beginning to substitute the scientific method of research
-for the a priori method of the school men if we would deal with real
-people and obtain a sense of participation with our fellows. The<span class="pagenum" id="Page_29">[Pg 29]</span>
-eighteenth-century humanitarian hotly insisted upon “the rights of
-man,” but he loved the people without really knowing them, which is
-by no means an impossible achievement. “The love of those whom a man
-does not know is quite as elemental a sentiment as the love of those
-whom a man does know,” but with this difference, that he shuts himself
-away from the opportunity of being caught and carried forward in the
-stream of their hopes and aspirations, a bigger and warmer current
-than he dreams of. The eighteenth-century humanitarian substituted his
-enthusiastic concept of “the natural man” for the warmth which this
-stream might have given him, and so long as he dealt with political
-concepts it answered his purpose. Mazzini made a most significant
-step between the eighteenth-century morality and our own by appealing
-beyond “the rights of man” to the “duties to humanity;” but although an
-impassioned democrat, he was still a moralist of the earlier type. He
-realized with them that the appeal to humanity would evoke a finer and
-deeper response than that to patriotism or to any sectional morality;
-but he shared the eighteenth-century tendency to idealization. It
-remained for the moralist of this generation to dissolve “humanity”
-into its component parts of men, women, and children and to serve their
-humblest needs with an enthusiasm<span class="pagenum" id="Page_30">[Pg 30]</span> which, so far from being dependent
-upon glamour, can be sustained only by daily knowledge and constant
-companionship.</p>
-
-<p>It is no easy task to detect and to follow the tiny paths of progress
-which the unencumbered proletarian with nothing but his life and
-capacity for labor, is pointing out for us. These paths lead to a type
-of government founded upon peace and fellowship as contrasted with
-restraint and defence. They can never be discovered with the eyes of
-the doctrinaire. From the nature of the case, he who would walk these
-paths must walk with the poor and oppressed, and can only approach them
-through affection and understanding. The ideals of militarism would
-forever shut him out from this new fellowship.</p>
-
-
-<div class="footnotes"><h3>FOOTNOTES:</h3>
-
-<div class="footnote">
-
-<p><a id="Footnote_1" href="#FNanchor_1" class="label">[1]</a> L. T. Hobhouse, Democracy and Reaction, page 197.</p>
-
-</div>
-
-<div class="footnote">
-
-<p><a id="Footnote_2" href="#FNanchor_2" class="label">[2]</a> The Growth of Cities in the Nineteenth Century. A. T.
-Weber, page 432.</p>
-
-</div>
-
-<div class="footnote">
-
-<p><a id="Footnote_3" href="#FNanchor_3" class="label">[3]</a> William James, Professor of Philosophy at Harvard
-University.</p>
-
-</div>
-</div>
-
-<hr class="chap x-ebookmaker-drop">
-
-<div class="chapter">
-<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_31">[Pg 31]</span></p>
-<h2 class="nobreak" id="CHAPTER_II">CHAPTER II<br><span class="small">SURVIVALS OF MILITARISM IN CIVIL GOVERNMENT</span></h2></div>
-
-
-<p>We are accustomed to say that the machinery of government incorporated
-in the charters of the early American cities, as in the Federal and
-State constitutions, was worked out by men who were strongly under the
-influence of the historians and doctrinaires of the eighteenth century.
-The most significant representative of these men is Thomas Jefferson,
-and their most telling phrase, the familiar opening that “all men are
-created free and equal.”</p>
-
-<p>We are only now beginning to suspect that the present admitted failure
-in municipal administration, the so-called “shame of American cities,”
-may be largely due to the inadequacy of those eighteenth-century
-ideals, with the breakdown of the machinery which they provided. We
-recognize the weakness inherent in the historic and doctrinaire method
-when it attempts to deal with growing and human institutions. While
-these men were strongly under the influence of peace<span class="pagenum" id="Page_32">[Pg 32]</span> ideals which were
-earnestly advocated, both in France and in America, even in the midst
-of their revolutionary periods, and while they read the burning poets
-and philosophers of their remarkable century, their idealism, after
-all, was largely founded upon theories concerning “the natural man,” a
-creature of their sympathetic imaginations.</p>
-
-<p>Because their idealism was of the type that is afraid of experience,
-these founders refused to look at the difficulties and blunders which
-a self-governing people were sure to encounter, and insisted that,
-if only the people had freedom, they would walk continuously in the
-paths of justice and righteousness. It was inevitable, therefore, that
-they should have remained quite untouched by that worldly wisdom which
-counsels us to know life as it is, and by that very modern belief that
-if the world is ever to go right at all, it must go right in its own
-way.</p>
-
-<p>A man of this generation easily discerns the crudeness of “that
-eighteenth-century conception of essentially unprogressive human
-nature in all the empty dignity of its ‘inborn rights.’”<a id="FNanchor_4" href="#Footnote_4" class="fnanchor">[4]</a> Because
-he has grown familiar with a more passionate human creed, with the
-modern evolutionary conception of the slowly advancing race whose<span class="pagenum" id="Page_33">[Pg 33]</span>
-rights are not “inalienable,” but hard-won in the tragic processes of
-experience, he realizes that these painfully acquired rights must be
-carefully cherished or they may at any moment slip out of our hands.
-We know better in America than anywhere else that civilization is
-not a broad road, with mile-stones indicating how far each nation
-has proceeded upon it, but a complex struggle forward, each race and
-nation contributing its quota; that the variety and continuity of this
-commingled life afford its charm and value. We would not, if we could,
-conform them to one standard. But this modern attitude, which may
-even now easily subside into negative tolerance, did not exist among
-the founders of the Republic, who, with all their fine talk of the
-“natural man” and what he would accomplish when he obtained freedom and
-equality, did not really trust the people after all.</p>
-
-<p>They timidly took the English law as their prototype, “whose very root
-is in the relation between sovereign and subject, between lawmaker
-and those whom the law restrains,” which has traditionally concerned
-itself more with the guarding of prerogative and with the rights of
-property than with the spontaneous life of the people. They serenely
-incorporated laws and survivals which registered the successful
-struggle<span class="pagenum" id="Page_34">[Pg 34]</span> of the barons against the aggressions of the sovereign,
-although the new country lacked both nobles and kings. Misled by the
-name of government, they founded their new government by an involuntary
-reference to a lower social state than that which they actually saw
-about them. They depended upon penalties, coercion, compulsion,
-remnants of military codes, to hold the community together; and it
-may be possible to trace much of the maladministration of our cities
-to these survivals, to the fact that our early democracy was a moral
-romanticism, rather than a well-grounded belief in social capacity and
-in the efficiency of the popular will.</p>
-
-<p>It has further happened that as the machinery, groaning under the
-pressure of new social demands put upon it, has broken down that from
-time to time, we have mended it by giving more power to administrative
-officers, because we still distrusted the will of the people. We are
-willing to cut off the dislocated part or to tighten the gearing, but
-are afraid to substitute a machine of newer invention and greater
-capacity. In the hour of danger we revert to the military and legal
-type although they become less and less appropriate to city life in
-proportion as the city grows more complex, more varied in resource and
-more highly<span class="pagenum" id="Page_35">[Pg 35]</span> organized, and is, therefore, in greater need of a more
-diffused local autonomy.</p>
-
-<p>A little examination will easily show that in spite of the fine phrases
-of the founders, the Government became an entity by itself away from
-the daily life of the people. There was no intention to ignore them
-nor to oppress them. But simply because its machinery was so largely
-copied from the traditional European Governments which did distrust
-the people, the founders failed to provide the vehicle for a vital
-and genuinely organized expression of the popular will. The founders
-carefully defined what was germane to government and what was quite
-outside its realm, whereas the very crux of local self-government, as
-has been well said, is involved in the “right to locally determine the
-scope of the local government,” in response to the needs as they arise.</p>
-
-<p>They were anxious to keep the reins of government in the hands of the
-good and professedly public-spirited, because, having staked so much
-upon the people whom they really knew so little, they became eager
-that they should appear well, and should not be given enough power to
-enable them really to betray their weaknesses. This was done in the
-same spirit in which a kind lady permits herself to give a tramp five
-cents, believing<span class="pagenum" id="Page_36">[Pg 36]</span> that, although he may spend it for drink, he cannot
-get very drunk upon so small a sum. In spite of a vague desire to
-trust the people, the founders meant to fall back in every crisis upon
-the old restraints which government has traditionally enlisted in its
-behalf, and were, perhaps, inevitably influenced by the experiences of
-the Revolutionary War. Having looked to the sword for independence from
-oppressive governmental control, they came to regard the sword as an
-essential part of the government they had succeeded in establishing.</p>
-
-<p>Regarded from the traditional standpoint, government has always needed
-this force of arms. The king, attempting to control the growing
-power of the barons as they wrested one privilege after another from
-him, was obliged to use it constantly; the barons later successfully
-established themselves in power only to be encroached upon by the
-growing strength and capital of the merchant class. These are now, in
-turn, calling upon the troops and militia for aid, as they are shorn of
-a pittance here and there by the rising power of the proletariat. The
-imperial, the feudal, the capitalistic forms of society each created
-by revolt against oppression from above, preserved their own forms of
-government only by carefully guarding their hardly won charters<span class="pagenum" id="Page_37">[Pg 37]</span> and
-constitutions. But in the very countries where these successive social
-forms have developed, full of survivals of the past, some beneficent
-and some detrimental, governments are becoming modified more rapidly
-than in this democracy where we ostensibly threw off traditional
-governmental oppression only to encase ourselves in a theory of
-virtuous revolt against oppressive government, which in many instances
-has proved more binding than the actual oppression itself.</p>
-
-<p>Did the founders cling too hard to that which they had won through
-persecution, hardship, and finally through a war of revolution? Did
-these doctrines seem so precious to them that they were determined to
-tie men up to them as long as possible, and allow them no chance to go
-on to new devices of government, lest they slight these that had been
-so hardly won? Did they estimate, not too highly, but by too exclusive
-a valuation, that which they had secured through the shedding of blood?</p>
-
-<p>Man has ever overestimated the spoils of war, and tended to lose his
-sense of proportion in regard to their value. He has ever surrounded
-them with a glamour beyond their deserts. This is quite harmless
-when the booty is an enemy’s sword hung over a household fire, or a
-battered<span class="pagenum" id="Page_38">[Pg 38]</span> flag decorating a city hall, but when the spoil of war is
-an idea which is bound on the forehead of the victor until it cramps
-his growth, a theory which he cherishes in his bosom until it grows so
-large and near that it afflicts its possessor with a sort of disease of
-responsibility for its preservation, it may easily overshadow the very
-people for whose cause the warrior issued forth.</p>
-
-<p>Was this overestimation of the founders the cause of our subsequent
-failures? or rather did not the fault lie with their successors, and
-does it not now rest with us, that we have wrapped our inheritance
-in a napkin and refused to add thereto? The founders fearlessly took
-the noblest word of their century and incorporated it into a public
-document. They ventured their fortunes and the future of their children
-upon its truth. We, with the belief of a progressive, developing human
-life, apparently accomplish less than they with their insistence upon
-rights and liberties which they so vigorously opposed to mediaeval
-restrictions and obligations. We are in that first period of conversion
-when we hold a creed which forecasts newer and larger possibilities
-for governmental development, without in the least understanding its
-spiritual implications. Although we have scrupulously extended the
-franchise to the varied immigrants among us, we have not<span class="pagenum" id="Page_39">[Pg 39]</span> yet admitted
-them into real political fellowship.</p>
-
-<p>It is easy to demonstrate that we consider our social and political
-problems almost wholly in the light of one wise group whom we call
-native Americans, legislating for the members of humbler groups whom
-we call immigrants. The first embodies the attitude of contempt or, at
-best, the patronage of the successful towards those who have as yet
-failed to succeed. We may consider the so-called immigration situation
-as an illustration of our failure to treat our growing Republic in the
-spirit of a progressive and developing democracy.</p>
-
-<p>The statement is made many times that we, as a nation, are rapidly
-reaching the limit of our powers of assimilation, that we receive
-further masses of immigrants at the risk of blurring those traits
-and characteristics which we are pleased to call American, with
-its corollary that the national standard of living is in danger
-of permanent debasement. Were we not in the midst of a certain
-intellectual dearth and apathy, of a skepticism in regard to the ideals
-of self-government which have ceased to charm men, we would see that
-we are testing our national life by a tradition too provincial and
-limited to meet its present motley and cosmopolitan character; that we
-lack mental energy, adequate knowledge, and<span class="pagenum" id="Page_40">[Pg 40]</span> a sense of the youth of
-the earth. The constant cry that American institutions are in danger
-betrays a spiritual waste, not due to our infidelity to national
-ideals, but arising from the fact that we fail to enlarge those ideals
-in accord with our faithful experience of life. Our political machinery
-devised for quite other conditions, has not been readjusted and adapted
-to the successive changes resulting from our development. The clamor
-for the town meeting, for the colonial and early century ideals of
-government is in itself significant, for we are apt to cling to the
-past through a very paucity of ideas.</p>
-
-<p>In a sense the enormous and unprecedented moving about over the face
-of the earth on the part of all nations is in itself the result of
-philosophic dogma of the eighteenth century—of the creed of individual
-liberty. The modern system of industry and commerce presupposes freedom
-of occupation, of travel, and residence; even more, it unhappily rests
-in a large measure upon the assumption of a body of the unemployed and
-the unskilled, ready to be absorbed or dropped according to the demands
-of production: but back of that, or certainly preceding its later
-developments, lies “the natural rights” doctrine of the eighteenth
-century. Even so late as 1892 an official treaty of the United States
-referred to the<span class="pagenum" id="Page_41">[Pg 41]</span> “inalienable rights of man to change his residence
-and religion.” This dogma of the schoolmen, dramatized in France and
-penetrating under a thousand forms into the most backward European
-States, is still operating as an obscure force in sending emigrants
-to America and in our receiving them here. But in the second century
-of its existence it has become too barren and chilly to induce any
-really zealous or beneficent activity on behalf of the immigrants after
-they arrive. On the other hand those things which we do believe—the
-convictions which might be formulated to the immeasurable benefit of
-the immigrants, and to the everlasting good of our national life,
-have not yet been satisfactorily stated, nor apparently apprehended
-by us, in relation to this field. We have no method by which to
-discover men, to spiritualize, to understand, to hold intercourse with
-aliens and to receive of what they bring. A century-old abstraction
-breaks down before this vigorous test of concrete cases and their
-demand for sympathetic interpretation. When we are confronted by the
-Italian lazzaroni, the peasants from the Carpathian foothills, and the
-proscribed traders from Galatia, we have no national ideality founded
-upon realism and tested by our growing experience with which to meet
-them, but only the platitudes of our crudest youth.<span class="pagenum" id="Page_42">[Pg 42]</span> The philosophers
-and statesmen of the eighteenth century believed that the universal
-franchise would cure all ills; that liberty and equality rested only
-upon constitutional rights and privileges; that to obtain these two
-and to throw off all governmental oppression constituted the full
-duty of the progressive patriot. We still keep to this formalization
-because the philosophers of this generation give us nothing newer. We
-ignore the fact that world-wide problems can no longer be solved by
-a political constitution assuring us against opposition, but that we
-must frankly face the proposition that the whole situation is more
-industrial than political. Did we apprehend this, we might then realize
-that the officers of the Government who are dealing with naturalization
-papers and testing the knowledge of the immigrants concerning the
-Constitution of the United States, are only playing with counters
-representing the beliefs of a century ago, while the real issues are
-being settled by the great industrial and commercial interests which
-are at once the products and the masters of our contemporary life.
-As children who are allowed to amuse themselves with poker chips
-pay no attention to the real game which their elders play with the
-genuine cards in their hands, so we shut our eyes to the exploitation
-and industrial debasement of the immigrant, and<span class="pagenum" id="Page_43">[Pg 43]</span> say, with placid
-contentment, that he has been given the rights of an American citizen,
-and that, therefore, all our obligations have been fulfilled. It is as
-if we should undertake to cure the contemporary political corruption
-founded upon a disregard of the Inter-State Commerce Acts, by requiring
-the recreant citizens to repeat the Constitution of the United States.</p>
-
-<p>As yet no vigorous effort is made to discover how far our present
-system of naturalization, largely resting upon laws enacted in 1802, is
-inadequate, although it may have met the requirements of “the fathers.”
-These processes were devised to test new citizens who had immigrated to
-the United States from political rather than from economic pressure,
-although these two have always been in a certain sense coextensive.
-Yet the early Irish came to America to seek an opportunity for
-self-government, denied them at home; the Germans and Italians started
-to come in largest numbers after the absorption of their smaller
-States into the larger nations; and the immigrants from Russia are the
-conquered Poles, Lithuanians, Finns, and Jews. On some such obscure
-notion the processes of naturalization were worked out, and, with a
-certain degree of logic, the first immigrants were presented with the
-Constitution of the United States as a type<span class="pagenum" id="Page_44">[Pg 44]</span> and epitome of that which
-they had come to seek. So far as they now come in search of political
-liberty, as many of them do every day, the test is still valid, but,
-in the meantime, we cannot ignore those significant figures which show
-emigration to rise with periods of depression in given countries, and
-immigration to be checked by periods of depression in America, and we
-refuse to see how largely the question has become an economic one.</p>
-
-<p>At the present moment, as we know, the actual importing of immigrants
-is left largely to the energy of steamship companies and to those
-agents for contract labor who are keen enough to avoid the restrictive
-laws. The business man is here again in the saddle, as he so largely
-is in American affairs. From the time that the immigrants first make
-the acquaintance of the steamship agent in their own villages, at
-least until a grandchild is born on the new soil, they are subjected
-to various processes of exploitation from purely commercial and
-self-seeking interests. It begins with the representatives of the
-transatlantic lines and their allies, who convert the peasant holdings
-into money, and provide the prospective emigrants with needless
-supplies, such as cartridge belts and bowie knives. The brokers, in
-manufactured passports, send their clients<span class="pagenum" id="Page_45">[Pg 45]</span> by successive stages for
-a thousand miles to a port suiting their purposes. On the way the
-emigrants’ eyes are treated that they may pass the physical test; they
-are taught to read sufficiently well to meet the literacy test; they
-are lent enough money to escape the pauper test, and by the time they
-have reached America, they are so hopelessly in debt that it requires
-months of work to repay all they have received. During this time they
-are completely under the control of the last broker in the line, who
-has his dingy office in an American city. The exploitation continues
-under the employment agency whose operations verge into those of the
-politician, through the naturalization henchman, the petty lawyers who
-foment their quarrels and grievances by the statement that in a free
-country everybody “goes to law,” by the liquor dealers who stimulate a
-lively trade among them, and, finally, by the lodging-house keepers and
-the landlords who are not obliged to give them the housing which the
-American tenant demands. It is a long dreary road, and the immigrant
-is successfully exploited at each turn. At moments one looking on is
-driven to quote the Titanic plaint of Walt Whitman:</p>
-
-<p>“As I stand aloof and look, there is to me something profoundly
-affecting in large masses<span class="pagenum" id="Page_46">[Pg 46]</span> of men following the lead of those who do
-not believe in men.”</p>
-
-<p>The sinister aspect of this exploitation lies in the fact that it is
-carried on by agents whose stock in trade are the counters and terms
-of citizenship. It is said that at the present moment there are more
-of these agents in Palermo than perhaps in any other European port,
-and that those politicians who have found it impossible to stay even
-in that corrupt city are engaged in the brokerage of naturalization
-papers in the United States. Certainly one effect of the stringent
-contract labor laws has been to make the padrones more powerful
-because “smuggled alien labor” has become more valuable to American
-corporations, and also to make simpler the delivery of immigrant
-votes according to the dictates of commercial interests. It becomes a
-veritable system of poisoning the notions of decent government; but
-because the entire process is carried on in political terms, because
-the poker chips are colored red, white, and blue, we are childishly
-indifferent to it. An elaborate avoidance of restrictions quickly
-adapts itself to changes either in legislation here or at the points
-of departure, because none of the legislation is founded upon a real
-analysis of the situation. For instance, a new type of broker in Russia
-during the Russian-Japanese War made<span class="pagenum" id="Page_47">[Pg 47]</span> use of the situation in the
-interests of young Russian Jews. If one of these men leaves the country
-ordinarily, his family is obliged to pay three hundred rubles to the
-Government, but if he first joins the army, his family is free from
-this obligation for he has passed into the keeping of his sergeant. Out
-of four hundred Russian Jews who, during three months, were drafted
-into the army at a given recruiting station, only ten reported,
-the rest having escaped through immigration. Of course the entire
-undertaking is much more hazardous, because the man is a deserter from
-the army in addition to his other disabilities; but the brokers merely
-put up the price of their services and continue their undertakings.</p>
-
-<p>All these evasions of immigration laws and regulations are simply
-possible because the governmental tests do not belong to the current
-situation, and because our political ideas are inherited from
-governmental conditions not our own. In our refusal to face the
-situation, we have persistently ignored the political ideals of the
-Celtic, Germanic, Latin, and Slavic immigrants who have successively
-come to us; and in our overwhelming ambition to remain Anglo-Saxon, we
-have fallen into the Anglo-Saxon temptation of governing all peoples
-by one standard. We have failed to work out a democratic government
-which<span class="pagenum" id="Page_48">[Pg 48]</span> should include the experiences and hopes of all the varied
-peoples among us. We justify the situation by some such process as that
-employed by each English elector who casts a vote for seventy-five
-subjects besides himself. He indirectly determines—although he may be
-a narrow-minded tradesman or a country squire interested only in his
-hounds and horses—the colonial policy, which shall in turn control
-the destinies of the Egyptian child toiling in the cotton factory in
-Alexandria, and of the half-starved Parsee working the opium fields of
-North India. Yet he cannot, in the nature of the case, be informed of
-the needs of these far-away people and he would venture to attempt it
-only in regard to people whom he considered “inferior.”</p>
-
-<p>Pending a recent election, a Chicago reformer begged his hearers to
-throw away all selfish thoughts of themselves when they went to the
-polls and to vote in behalf of the poor and ignorant foreigners of the
-city. It would be difficult to suggest anything which would result
-in a more serious confusion than to have each man, without personal
-knowledge and experiences, consider the interests of the newly arrived
-immigrant. The voter would have to give himself over to a veritable
-debauch of altruism in order to persuade himself that his vote would be
-of the least value to those<span class="pagenum" id="Page_49">[Pg 49]</span> men of whom he knew so little, and whom
-he considered so remote and alien to himself. In truth the attitude of
-the advising reformer was in reality so contemptuous that he had never
-considered the immigrants really partakers and molders of the political
-life of his country.</p>
-
-<p>This attitude of contempt, of provincialism, this survival of
-the spirit of the conqueror toward an inferior people, has many
-manifestations, but none so harmful as when it becomes absorbed and
-imitated and is finally evinced by the children of the foreigners
-toward their own parents.</p>
-
-<p>We are constantly told of the increase of criminals in the second
-generation of immigrants, and, day after day, one sees lads of twelve
-and fourteen throwing off the restraint of family life and striking
-out for themselves. The break has come thus early, partly from the
-forced development of the child under city conditions, partly because
-the parents have had no chance of following, even remotely, this
-development, but largely because the Americanized child has copied the
-contemptuous attitude towards the foreigner which he sees all about
-him. The revolt has in it something of the city impatience of country
-standards, but much more of America against Poland or Italy. It is all
-wretchedly sordid with bitterness on the part of the parents, and<span class="pagenum" id="Page_50">[Pg 50]</span>
-hardhearted indifference and recklessness on the part of the boy. Only
-occasionally can the latter be appealed to by filial affection after
-the first break has once been thoroughly made; and yet, sometimes,
-even these lads see the pathos of the situation. A probation officer
-from Hull-House one day surprised three truants who were sitting by
-a bonfire which they had built near the river. Sheltered by an empty
-freight car, the officer was able to listen to their conversation. The
-Pole, the Italian, and the Bohemian boys who had broken the law by
-staying away from school, by building a fire in dangerous proximity to
-freight cars, and by “swiping” the potatoes which they were roasting,
-seemed to have settled down into an almost halcyon moment of gentleness
-and reminiscence. The Italian boy commiserated his parents because they
-hated the cold and the snow and “couldn’t seem to get used to it;” the
-Pole said that his father missed seeing folks that he knew and was
-“sore on this country;” the Bohemian lad really grew quite tender about
-his old grandmother and the “stacks of relations” who came to see her
-every Sunday in the old country, where, in contrast to her loneliness
-here, she evidently had been a person of consequence. All of them felt
-the pathos of the situation, but the predominant note was the cheap
-contempt of the<span class="pagenum" id="Page_51">[Pg 51]</span> new American for foreigners, even though they are of
-his own blood. The weakening of the tie which connects one generation
-with another may be called the domestic results of the contemptuous
-attitude. But the social results of the contemptuous attitude are even
-more serious and nowhere so grave as in the modern city.</p>
-
-<p>Men are there brought together by multitudes in response to the
-concentration of industry and commerce without bringing with them
-the natural social and family ties or the guild relationships which
-distinguished the mediaeval cities and held even so late as the
-eighteenth century, when the country people came to town in response
-to the normal and slowly formed ties of domestic service, family
-affection, and apprenticeship. Men who come to a modern city by
-immigration break all these older ties and the national bond in
-addition. There is all the more necessity to develop that cosmopolitan
-bond which forms their substitute. The immigrants will be ready to
-adapt themselves to a new and vigorous civic life founded upon the
-recognition of their needs if the Government which is at present
-administered in our cities, will only admit that these needs are
-germane to its functions. The framers of the carefully prepared
-charters, upon which the cities are founded, did not foresee that
-after the universal<span class="pagenum" id="Page_52">[Pg 52]</span> franchise had once been granted, social needs
-and ideals were bound to enter in as legitimate objects of political
-action. Neither did these framers realize, on the other hand, that the
-only people in a democracy who can legitimately become the objects
-of repressive government, are those people who are too undeveloped
-to use their liberty or those who have forfeited their right to full
-citizenship. We have, therefore, a municipal administration in America
-which concerns itself only grudgingly with the social needs of the
-people, and is largely reduced to the administration of restrictive
-measures. The people who come most directly in contact with the
-executive officials, who are the legitimate objects of their control,
-are the vicious, who need to be repressed; and the semi-dependent
-poor, who appeal to them in their dire need; or, for quite the reverse
-reason, those who are trying to avoid an undue taxation, resenting the
-fact that they should be made to support a government which, from the
-nature of the case, is too barren to excite their real enthusiasm.</p>
-
-<p>The instinctive protest against this mechanical method of civic
-control, with the lack of adjustment between the natural democratic
-impulse and the fixed external condition, inevitably produces the
-indifferent citizen, and the so-called “professional politician.” The
-first, because<span class="pagenum" id="Page_53">[Pg 53]</span> he is not vicious, feels that the real processes of
-government do not concern him and wishes only to be let alone. The
-latter easily adapts himself to an illegal avoidance of the external
-fixed conditions by assuming that these conditions have been settled
-by doctrinaires who did not in the least understand the people,
-while he, the politician, makes his appeal beyond the conditions to
-the real desires of the people themselves. He is thus not only “the
-people’s friend,” but their interpreter. It is interesting to note
-how often simple people refer to “them,” meaning the good and great
-who govern but do not understand, and to “him,” meaning the alderman,
-who represents them in these incomprehensible halls of State, as an
-ambassador to a foreign country to whose borders they themselves could
-not possibly penetrate, and whose language they do not speak.</p>
-
-<p>In addition to this difficulty inherent in the difference between the
-traditional and actual situation, there is another, which constantly
-arises on the purely administrative side. The traditional governments
-which the founders had copied, in proceeding by fixed standards to
-separate the vicious from the good, and then to legislate against the
-vicious, had enforced these restrictive measures by trained officials,
-usually with a military background. In a democracy, however,<span class="pagenum" id="Page_54">[Pg 54]</span>
-the officers entrusted with the enforcement of this restrictive
-legislation, if not actually elected by the people themselves, are
-still the appointments of those thus elected and are, therefore,
-good-natured men who have made friends by their kindness and social
-qualities. This is only decreasingly true even in those cities where
-appointments are made by civil service examinations. The carrying out
-of repressive legislation, the remnant of a military state of society,
-in a democracy is at last put into the hands of men who have attained
-office because of political pull. The repressive measures must be
-enforced by those sympathizing with the people and belonging to those
-against whom the measures operate. This anomalous situation produces
-almost inevitably one result: that the police authorities themselves
-are turned into allies of vice and crime. This may be illustrated
-from almost any of the large American cities in the relation existing
-between the police force and the gambling and other illicit life. The
-officers are often flatly told that the enforcement of an ordinance
-which the better element of the city has insisted upon passing, is
-impossible; that they are expected to control only the robbery and
-crime that so often associate themselves with vice. As Mr. Wilcox<a id="FNanchor_5" href="#Footnote_5" class="fnanchor">[5]</a>
-has recently<span class="pagenum" id="Page_55">[Pg 55]</span> pointed out, public sentiment itself assumes a certain
-hypocrisy, and in the end we have “the abnormal conditions which are
-created when vice is protected by the authorities,” and in the very
-worst cases there develops a sort of municipal blackmail in which
-the administration itself profits by the violation of law. The very
-governmental agencies which were designed to protect the citizen
-from vice, foster and protect him in its pursuance because everybody
-involved is thoroughly confused by the human element in the situation.
-Further than this, the officer’s very kindness and human understanding
-is that which leads to his downfall, for he is forced to uphold the
-remnant of a military discipline in a self-governing community. It is
-not remarkable, perhaps, that the police department, the most vigorous
-survival of militarism to be found in American cities, has always
-been responsible for the most exaggerated types of civic corruption.
-It is sad, however, that this corruption has largely been due to the
-kindliness of the officers and to their lack of military training.
-There is no doubt that the reasonableness of keeping the saloons in
-lower New York open on Sunday was apparent to the policemen of the East
-Side force long before it dawned upon the reform administration; and
-yet, that the policemen allowed<span class="pagenum" id="Page_56">[Pg 56]</span> themselves to connive at law-breaking,
-was the beginning of their disgraceful downfall. Because kindness to an
-enemy may mean death or the annihilation of the army which he guards,
-all kindness is illicit on the part of the military sentinel on duty;
-but to bring that code over bodily into a peaceful social state is to
-break down the morals of both sides, of the enforcer of the ill-adapted
-law, as well as of those against whom it is so maladroitly directed.</p>
-
-<p>In order to meet this situation, there is almost inevitably developed
-a politician of the corrupt type so familiar in American cities, the
-politician who has become successful because he has made friends
-with the vicious. The semi-criminal, who are constantly brought in
-contact with administrative government are naturally much interested
-in its operations. Having much at stake, as a matter of course, they
-attend the primaries and all the other election processes which so
-quickly tire the good citizens whose interest in the government is a
-self-imposed duty. To illustrate: it is a matter of much moment to a
-gambler whether there is to be a “wide-open town” or not; it means the
-success or failure of his business; it involves, not only the pleasure,
-but the livelihood, of all his friends. He naturally attends to the
-election of the alderman, to the appointment and retention<span class="pagenum" id="Page_57">[Pg 57]</span> of the
-policeman. He is found at the caucus “every time,” and would be much
-amused if he were praised for the performance of his civic duty; but,
-because he and the others who are concerned in semi-illicit business do
-attend the primaries, the corrupt politician is nominated over and over
-again.</p>
-
-<p>As this type of politician is successful from his alliance with crime,
-there also inevitably arises from time to time a so-called reformer
-who is shocked to discover the state of affairs, the easy partnership
-between vice and administrative government. He dramatically uncovers
-the situation and arouses great indignation against it on the part of
-good citizens. If this indignation is enough, he creates a political
-fervor which is translated into a claim upon public gratitude. In
-portraying the evil he is fighting, he does not recognize, or at least
-does not make clear, all the human kindness upon which it has grown.
-In his speeches he inevitably offends a popular audience, who know
-that the evil of corruption exists in all degrees and forms of human
-weakness, but who also know that these evils are by no means always
-hideous, and sometimes even are lovable. They resent his over-drawn
-pictures of vice and of the life of the vicious; their sense of<span class="pagenum" id="Page_58">[Pg 58]</span>
-fair play, their deep-rooted desire for charity and justice, are all
-outraged.</p>
-
-<p>To illustrate from a personal experience: Some years ago a famous New
-York reformer came to Chicago to tell us of his phenomenal success,
-his trenchant methods of dealing with the city “gambling-hells,” as
-he chose to call them. He proceeded to describe the criminals of
-lower New York in terms and phrases which struck at least one of his
-auditors as sheer blasphemy against our common human nature. I thought
-of the criminals whom I knew, of the gambler for whom each Saturday
-I regularly collected his weekly wage of $24.00, keeping $18.00 for
-his wife and children and giving him $6.00 on Monday morning. His
-despairing statement, “the thing is growing on me, and I can never give
-it up,” was certainly not the cry of a man living in hell, but of him
-who, through much tribulation had at least kept the loyal intention.
-I remembered the three girls who had come to me with a paltry sum of
-money collected from the pawn and sale of their tawdry finery in order
-that one of their number might be spared a death in the almshouse and
-that she might have the wretched comfort during the closing weeks of
-her life of knowing that, although she was an outcast, she was not a
-pauper. I recalled the first murderer<span class="pagenum" id="Page_59">[Pg 59]</span> whom I had ever known, a young
-man who was singing his baby to sleep and stopped to lay it in its
-cradle before he rushed downstairs into his father’s saloon to scatter
-the gang of boys who were teasing the old man by giving him English
-orders. The old man could not understand English and the boys were
-refusing to pay for the drinks they had consumed, but technically had
-not ordered.</p>
-
-<p>For one short moment I saw the situation from the point of view of
-humbler people, who sin often through weakness and passion, but seldom
-through hardness of heart, and I felt that in a democratic community
-such sweeping condemnations and conclusions as the speaker was pouring
-forth could never be accounted for righteousness.</p>
-
-<p>As the policeman who makes terms with vice, and almost inevitably
-slides into making gain from vice, merely represents the type of
-politician who is living off the weakness of his fellows, so the
-over-zealous reformer who exaggerates vice until the public is scared
-and awestruck, represents the type of politician who is living off the
-timidity of his fellows. With the lack of civic machinery for simple
-democratic expression, for a direct dealing with human nature as it is,
-we seem doomed to one type or the other—corruptionists or anti-crime
-committees.</p>
-
-<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_60">[Pg 60]</span></p>
-
-<p>And one sort or the other we will continue to have so long as we
-distrust the very energy of existence, the craving for enjoyment,
-the pushing of vital forces, the very right of every citizen to be
-what he is without pretense or assumption of virtue. Too often he
-does not really admire these virtues, but he imagines them somewhere
-as a standard adopted by the virtuous whom he does not know. That
-old Frankenstein, the ideal man of the eighteenth century, is still
-haunting us, although he never existed save in the brain of the
-doctrinaire.</p>
-
-<p>This dramatic and feverish triumph of the self-seeker, see-sawing
-with that of the interested reformer, does more than anything else,
-perhaps, to keep the American citizen away from the ideals of genuine
-evolutionary democracy. Whereas repressive government, from the
-nature of the case, has to do with the wicked who are happily always
-in a minority in the community, a normal democratic government would
-naturally have to do with the great majority of the population in their
-normal relations to each other.</p>
-
-<p>After all, the so-called “slum politician” ventures his success upon an
-appeal to human sentiment and generosity. This venture often results in
-an alliance between the popular politician and the humblest citizens,
-quite as naturally as the reformer<span class="pagenum" id="Page_61">[Pg 61]</span> who stands for honest business
-administration usually becomes allied with the type of business man
-whose chief concern it is to guard his treasure and to prevent a rise
-in taxation. The community is again insensibly divided into two camps,
-the repressed, who is dimly conscious that he has no adequate outlet
-for his normal life and the repressive, represented by the cautious,
-careful citizen holding fast to his own,—once more the conqueror and
-his humble people.</p>
-
-
-<div class="footnotes"><h3>FOOTNOTES:</h3>
-
-<div class="footnote">
-
-<p><a id="Footnote_4" href="#FNanchor_4" class="label">[4]</a> “The Spirit of Modern Philosophy,” Josiah Royce, page 275.</p>
-
-</div>
-
-<div class="footnote">
-
-<p><a id="Footnote_5" href="#FNanchor_5" class="label">[5]</a> The American City, Dr. Delos F. Wilcox, page 200.</p>
-
-</div>
-</div>
-
-<hr class="chap x-ebookmaker-drop">
-
-<div class="chapter">
-<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_62">[Pg 62]</span></p>
-<h2 class="nobreak" id="CHAPTER_III">CHAPTER III<br><span class="small">FAILURE TO UTILIZE IMMIGRANTS IN CITY GOVERNMENT</span></h2></div>
-
-
-<p>We do much loose talking in regard to American immigration; we use
-the phrase, “the scum of Europe,” and other unwarranted words without
-realizing that the unsuccessful man, the undeveloped peasant, may be
-much more valuable to us here than the more highly developed, but
-also more highly specialized, town dweller, who may much less readily
-acquire the characteristics which the new environment demands.</p>
-
-<p>If successful struggle ends in the survival of the few, in blatant and
-tangible success for the few only, government will have to reckon most
-largely with the men who have been beaten in the struggle, with the
-effect upon them of the contest and the defeat; for, after all, the
-unsuccessful will always represent the majority of the citizens, and it
-is with the large majority that self-government must eventually deal
-whatever course of action other governments may legitimately determine
-for themselves.</p>
-
-<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_63">[Pg 63]</span></p>
-
-<p>To demand to be protected from the many unsuccessful among us, who are
-supposed to issue forth from the shallows of our city life and seize
-upon the treasure of the citizens as the barbarians of old came from
-outside the city walls, is of course not to have read the first lesson
-of self-government in the light of evolutionary science. It is to
-forget that a revival in self-government, an awakening of its original
-motive power and <i>raison d’être</i>, can come only from a genuine
-desire to increase its scope, and to adapt it to new and strenuous
-conditions. In this way science revived and leaped forward under the
-pressure of the enlarged demand of manufacture and commerce put upon it
-during the industrial decades just passed.</p>
-
-<p>We would ask the moralists and statesmen of this dawning century,
-equipped as they are, with the historic method, to save our
-contemporaries from skepticism in regard to self-government by
-revealing to them its adaptability to the needs of the humblest man
-who is so sorely pressed in this industrial age. The statesman who
-would fill his countrymen with enthusiasm for democratic government
-must not only possess a genuine understanding of the needs of the
-simplest citizens, but he must know how to reveal their capacities
-and powers. He must needs go<span class="pagenum" id="Page_64">[Pg 64]</span> man-hunting into those curious groups
-we call newly arrived immigrants, and do for them what the scholar
-has done in pointing out to us the sweetness and charm which inhere
-in primitive domestic customs and in showing us the curious pivot
-these customs make for religious and tribal beliefs. The scholar who
-has surrounded the simplest action of women grinding millet or corn
-with a penetrating reminiscence, sweeter than the chant they sing,
-may reveal something of the same reminiscence and charm among many
-of the immigrants. In the midst of crowded city streets one stumbles
-upon an old Italian peasant with her distaff against her withered face
-and her pathetic hands patiently “holding the thread,” as has been
-done by myriads of women since children needed to be clad; or one
-sees an old German potter, misshapen by years, his sensitive hands
-nevertheless fairly alive with skill and delicacy, and his life at
-least illumined with the artist’s prerogative of direct creation.
-Could we take these primitive habits as they are to be found every day
-in American cities and give them their significance and place, they
-would be a wonderful factor for poetry in cities frankly given over
-to industrialism and absorbed in its activities. As a McAndrews’ hymn
-expresses the frantic rush of the industrial river, so these primitive
-customs could give us<span class="pagenum" id="Page_65">[Pg 65]</span> something of the mysticism and charm of the
-industrial springs, a suggestion of source, a touch of the refinement
-which adheres to simple things. This study of origins, of survivals,
-of paths of least resistance—refining an industrial age through the
-people and experiences which really belong to it and do not need to
-be brought in from the outside—would surely result in a revived
-enthusiasm for human life and its possibilities which would in turn
-react upon the ideals of government. The present lack of understanding
-of simple people and the dearth of the illumination which knowledge of
-them would give, can be traced not only in the social and political
-maladjustment of the immigrant in municipal centres, but is felt in
-so-called “practical affairs” of national magnitude. Regret is many
-times expressed that, notwithstanding the fact that nine out of every
-ten immigrants are of rural birth and are fitted to undertake that
-painstaking method of cultivating the soil which American farmers
-despise, they nevertheless all tend to congregate in cities where
-their inherited and elaborate knowledge of agricultural processes is
-unutilized. But it is characteristic of American complacency when any
-assisted removal to agricultural regions is contemplated, that we
-utterly ignore the past experiences of the immigrant and always assume<span class="pagenum" id="Page_66">[Pg 66]</span>
-that each family will be content to live in the middle of its own piece
-of ground, although there are few peoples on the face of the earth who
-have ever tried isolating a family on one hundred and sixty acres or on
-eighty, or even on forty. But this is the American way—a survival of
-our pioneer days—and we refuse to modify it, even in regard to South
-Italians, although from the day of mediaeval incursions they have lived
-in compact villages with an intense and elaborated social life, so
-much of it out of doors and interdependent that it has affected almost
-every domestic habit. Italian women knead their own bread, but depend
-on the village oven for its baking, and the men would rather walk for
-miles to their fields each day than to face an evening of companionship
-limited to the family. Nothing could afford a better check to the
-constant removal to the cities of the farming population all over the
-United States than the possibility of combining community life with
-agricultural occupation. This combination would afford that development
-of civilization which, curiously enough, density alone brings and
-for which even a free system of rural delivery is not an adequate
-substitute. Much of the significance and charm of rural life in South
-Italy lies in its village companionship, quite as the dreariness of the
-American farm life inheres in<span class="pagenum" id="Page_67">[Pg 67]</span> its unnecessary solitude. But we totally
-disregard the solution which the old agricultural community offers,
-and our utter lack of adaptability has something to do with the fact
-that the South Italian remains in the city where he soon forgets his
-cunning in regard to silk worms and olive trees, but continues his old
-social habits to the extent of filling an entire tenement house with
-the people from one village.</p>
-
-<p>We also exhibit all the Anglo-Saxon distrust of any experiment with
-land tenure or method of taxation, although our single-tax advocates do
-not fail to tell us daily of the stupidity of the present arrangement.
-It might, indeed, be well to make a few experiments upon an historic
-basis before their enthusiasm converts us all. For centuries in
-Russia the Slavic village, the mir system of land occupation, has
-been in successful operation, training men within its narrow limits
-to community administration. Yet when a persecuted sect from Russia
-wishes to find refuge in America, we insist that seven thousand
-people shall give up all at once a system of land ownership in which
-they are experts. Americans declare the system to be impracticable,
-although it is singularly like that in vogue in Palestine during the
-period of its highest prosperity. We cannot receive them in the United
-States, because<span class="pagenum" id="Page_68">[Pg 68]</span> our laws have no way of dealing with such cases.
-And in Canada, where they are finally settled, the unimaginative
-Dominion officials are driven to the verge of distraction concerning
-registration of deeds and the collection of taxes from men who do not
-claim acres in their own names, but in the name of the village. The
-official distraction is reflected and intensified among the people
-themselves, to the point of driving them into the mediaeval “marching
-mania,” in the hope of finding a land in the south where they may carry
-out their inoffensive “mir” system. The entire situation might prove
-that an unbending theory of individualism may become as fixed as status
-itself, although there are certainly other factors in the Doukhobor
-situation—religious bigotry, and the self-seeking of leadership.
-In spite of the fact that the Canadian officials have in other
-matters exhibited much of the adaptability which distinguishes the
-British colonial policy, they are completely stranded on the rock of
-Anglo-Saxon individualistic ownership, and assume that any other system
-of land tenure is subversive of government, forgetting that Russia
-manages to exert a fair amount of governmental control over thousands
-of acres held under the system which they so detest.</p>
-
-<p>In our eagerness to reproach the immigrants for<span class="pagenum" id="Page_69">[Pg 69]</span> not going upon the
-land we almost overlook the contributions to city life which those
-of them, who were adapted to it in Europe, are making to our cities
-here. From dingy little eating-houses in lower New York, performing a
-function somewhat between the eighteenth-century coffee-house and the
-Parisian café, is issuing at the present moment perhaps the sturdiest
-realistic drama that is being produced on American soil. Late into the
-night speculation is carried forward—not on the nice questions of
-the Talmud and on quibbles of logic; but minds long trained on these
-seriously discuss the need of a readjustment of the industrial machine
-in order that the primitive sense of justice and righteousness may
-secure larger play in our social organization. And yet a Russian in
-Chicago who used to believe that Americans cared first and foremost
-for political liberty and that they would certainly admire those who
-had suffered in its cause, finds no one interested in his story of six
-years’ banishment beyond the Antarctic circle. He is really listened to
-only when he tells the tale to a sportsman of the fish he had caught
-during the six weeks of summer when the rivers were open. “Lively work
-then, but plenty of time to eat them dried or frozen through the rest
-of the year,” is the most sympathetic comment he has yet received<span class="pagenum" id="Page_70">[Pg 70]</span> upon
-an experience which, at least to him, held the bittersweet of martyrdom.</p>
-
-<p>Among the colonies of the most recently immigrated Jews, who still
-carry out their orthodox customs and a ritual preserved through
-centuries in the Ghetto, one constantly feels during a season of
-religious observance, a refreshing insistence upon the reality of the
-inner life, and upon the dignity of its expression in inherited form.
-Perhaps the most striking reproach to the materialism of Chicago is the
-sight on a solemn Jewish holiday of a Chicago River bridge lined with
-men and women oblivious of the noisy traffic and sordid surroundings,
-casting their sins upon the waters that they may be carried far away.
-The scene is a clear statement that, after all, life does not consist
-in wealth, in learning, in enterprise, in energy, in success, not even
-in that modern fetich, culture, but in an inner equilibrium, in “the
-agreement of soul.” It is a relief to see even this exaggerated and
-grotesque presentation of spiritual values.</p>
-
-<p>But the statesman shuts himself away from the possibility of using
-these great reservoirs of human ability and motive power because he
-considers it patriotic to hold to governmental lines and ideals laid
-down a century and a quarter ago. Because of a military inheritance,
-we as a nation stoutly<span class="pagenum" id="Page_71">[Pg 71]</span> contend that all this varied and suggestive
-life has nothing to do with government nor patriotism, and that we
-perform the full duty of American citizens when the provisions of the
-statutes on naturalization are carried out. In the meantime, in the
-interests of our theory that commercial and governmental powers should
-have no connection with each other, we carefully ignore the one million
-false naturalization papers in the United States issued and concealed
-by commercialized politics. Although we have an uneasy knowledge that
-these powers are curiously allied, we profess that the latter has no
-connection with the former and no control over it. We steadily refuse
-to recognize the fact that our age is swayed by industrial forces.</p>
-
-<p>Fortunately, life is much bigger and finer than our theories about
-it, and, among all the immigrants in the great cities, there is
-slowly developing the beginnings of self-government on the lines of
-their daily experiences. The man who really knows immigrants and
-undertakes to naturalize them, makes no pretense of the lack of
-connection between their desire to earn their daily bread and their
-citizenship. The petty and often corrupt politician who is first kind
-to immigrants, realizes perfectly well that the force pushing them to
-this country has been industrial need and that<span class="pagenum" id="Page_72">[Pg 72]</span> recognition of this
-need is legitimate. He follows the natural course of events when he
-promises to get the immigrant “a job,” for that is undoubtedly what
-the immigrant most needs in all the world. If the politician nearest
-to him were really interested in the immigrant and were to work out
-a scheme of naturalization fitted to the situation, the immigrant
-would proceed from the street-cleaning and sewer-digging in which he
-first engages, to an understanding of the relation of these simple
-offices to city government. Through them he would understand the
-obligation of his alderman to secure cleanliness for the streets
-in which his children play and for the tenement in which he lives.
-The notion of representative government could be made quite clear
-and concrete to him. He could demand his rights and use his vote in
-order to secure them. His very naïve demands might easily become a
-restraint, a purifying check upon the alderman, instead of a source of
-constant corruption and exploitation. But when the politician attempts
-to naturalize the bewildered immigrant, he must perforce accept
-the doctrinaire standard imposed by men who held a theory totally
-unattached to experience, and he must, therefore, begin with the remote
-Constitution of the United States. At the Cook County Court-House only
-a short time ago a candidate<span class="pagenum" id="Page_73">[Pg 73]</span> for naturalization, who was asked the
-usual question as to what the Constitution of the United States was,
-replied: “The Illinois Central.” His mind naturally turned to his
-work, to the one bit of contribution he had genuinely made to the new
-country, and his reply might well offer a valuable suggestion to the
-student of educational method. Some of our most advanced schools are
-even now making industrial construction and evolution a natural basis
-for all future acquisition of knowledge, and they claim that anything
-less vital and creative is inadequate.</p>
-
-<p>It is surprising how a simple experience, if it be but genuine, gives
-an opening into citizenship altogether lacking to the more grandiose
-attempts. A Greek-American, slaughtering sheep in a tenement-house
-yard, reminiscent of the Homeric tradition, can be made to see the
-effect of the improvised shambles on his neighbor’s health and the
-right of the city to prohibit the slaughtering, only as he perceives
-the development of city government upon its most modern basis.</p>
-
-<p>The enforcement of adequate child labor laws offers unending
-opportunity to better citizenship founded, not upon theory but on
-action, as does the compulsory education law, which makes clear that
-education is a matter of vital importance to the American city and to
-the State which has<span class="pagenum" id="Page_74">[Pg 74]</span> enacted definite, well-considered legislation in
-regard to it. Some of the most enthusiastic supporters of child-labor
-legislation and of compulsory education laws are those parents who
-sacrifice old-world tradition, as well as the much-needed earnings of
-their young children, because of loyalty to the laws of their adopted
-country. Certainly genuine sacrifice for the nation’s law is a good
-foundation for patriotism, and as this again is not a doctrinaire
-question, women are not debarred, and mothers who wash and scrub for
-the meagre support of their children say, sturdily, sometimes: “It will
-be a year before he can go to work without breaking the law, but we
-came to this country to give the young ones a chance, and we are not
-going to begin by having them do what’s not right.”</p>
-
-<p>Upon some such basis as this the Hebrew Alliance and the Charity
-Organization of New York, which are putting forth desperate energy in
-the enormous task of ministering to the suffering which immigration
-entails, are developing understanding and respect for the alien through
-their mutual efforts to secure more adequate tenement-house regulation
-and to control the spread of tuberculosis; both these undertakings
-being perfectly hopeless without the intelligent co-operation of
-the immigrants themselves.<span class="pagenum" id="Page_75">[Pg 75]</span> Through such humble doors, perchance,
-the immigrant will at last enter into his heritage in a new nation.
-Democratic government has ever been the result of spiritual travail
-and moral effort. Apparently, even here, the immigrant must pay the
-old cost, and he seems to represent the group and type which is making
-the most genuine contribution to the present growth in governmental
-functions, with its constant demand for increasing adaptations.</p>
-
-<p>In the induction of the adult immigrant into practical citizenship,
-we constantly ignore his daily experience. We also assume in our
-formal attempts to teach patriotism to him and to his children, that
-experience and traditions have no value, and that a new sentiment
-must be put into aliens by some external process. Some years ago, a
-public-spirited organization engaged a number of speakers to go to
-the various city schools in order to instruct the children in the
-significance of Decoration Day and to foster patriotism among the
-foreign born, by descriptions of the Civil War. In one of the schools,
-filled with Italian children, an old soldier, a veteran in years and
-experience, gave a description of a battle in Tennessee, and of his
-personal adventures in using a pile of brush as an ambuscade and a
-fortification. Coming from the<span class="pagenum" id="Page_76">[Pg 76]</span> schoolhouse, an eager young Italian
-broke out, with characteristic vividness, into a description of his
-father’s campaigning under the leadership of Garibaldi, possibly
-from some obscure notion that that, too, was a civil war fought from
-principle, but more likely because the description of one battle
-had roused in his mind the memory of another such description. The
-lecturer, whose sympathies happened to be on the other side of the
-Garibaldian conflict, somewhat sharply told him that he must forget
-all that; that he was no longer an Italian, but an American. The
-natural growth of patriotism based upon respect for the achievements
-of one’s fathers, the bringing together of the past with the present,
-the significance of the almost world-wide effort at a higher standard
-of political freedom which swept over all Europe and America between
-1848 and 1872 could, of course, have no place in the boy’s mind because
-it had none in the mind of the instructor whose patriotism apparently
-tried to purify itself by the American process of elimination.</p>
-
-<p>How far a certain cosmopolitan humanitarianism ignoring national
-differences, is either possible or desirable, it is difficult to
-state; but certain it is that the old type of patriotism, founded
-upon a common national history and land occupation, becomes to many
-of the immigrants who<span class="pagenum" id="Page_77">[Pg 77]</span> bring it with them a veritable stumbling-block
-and impediment. Many Greeks whom I know are fairly besotted with a
-consciousness of their national importance, and the achievements
-of their glorious past. Among them the usual effort to found a new
-patriotism upon American history is often an absurd undertaking; for
-instance, on the night of one Thanksgiving Day, I spent some time and
-zeal in a description of the Pilgrim Fathers, and the motives which
-had driven them across the sea, while the experiences of the Plymouth
-colony were illustrated by stereopticon slides and little dramatic
-scenes. The audience of Greeks listened respectfully, although I
-was uneasily conscious of the somewhat feeble attempt to boast of
-Anglo-Saxon achievement in hardihood and privation, to men whose powers
-of admiration were absorbed in their Greek background of philosophy
-and beauty. At any rate, after the lecture was over, one of the Greeks
-said to me, quite simply, “I wish I could describe my ancestors to
-you; they were very different from yours.” His further remarks were
-translated by a little Irish boy of eleven, who speaks modern Greek
-with facility and turns many an honest penny by translating, into the
-somewhat pert statement: “He says if <i>that</i> is what your ancestors
-are like, that his could beat them out.”<span class="pagenum" id="Page_78">[Pg 78]</span> It is a good illustration of
-our faculty for ignoring the past, and of our failure to understand the
-immigrant’s estimation of ourselves. This lack of a more cosmopolitan
-standard, of a consciousness of kind founded upon creative imagination
-and historic knowledge is apparent in many directions, and cruelly
-widens the gulf between immigrant fathers and their children who are
-“Americans in process.”</p>
-
-<p>A hideous story comes from New York of a young Russian Jewess who was
-employed as a stenographer in a down-town office, where she became
-engaged to be married to a young man of Jewish-American parentage.
-She felt keenly the difference between him and her newly immigrated
-parents, and on the night when he was to be presented to them she went
-home early to make every possible preparation for his coming. Her
-efforts to make the <i>ménage</i> presentable were so discouraging,
-the whole situation filled her with such chagrin, that an hour before
-his expected arrival, she ended her life. Although the father was a
-Talmud scholar of standing in his native Russian town, and the lover
-was a clerk of very superficial attainments, she possessed no standard
-by which to judge the two men. This lack of standard must be charged
-to the entire community; for why should we expect an<span class="pagenum" id="Page_79">[Pg 79]</span> untrained girl
-to be able to do for herself what the community so pitifully fails to
-accomplish?</p>
-
-<p>All the members of the community are equally stupid in throwing away
-the immigrant revelation of social customs and inherited energy.
-We continually allow this valuable human experience to go to waste
-although we have reached the stage of humanitarianism when no infant
-may be wantonly allowed to die, no man be permitted to freeze or
-starve, if the State can prevent it. We may truthfully boast that the
-primitive, wasteful struggle of physical existence is practically over,
-but no such statement can be made in regard to spiritual life. Students
-of social conditions recognize the fact that modern charity constantly
-grows more democratic and constructive, and daily more concerned for
-preventive measures, but to admit frankly similar aims as matters for
-municipal government as yet seems impossible.</p>
-
-<p>In this country it seems to be only the politician at the bottom,
-the man nearest the people, who understands that there is a growing
-disinterestedness taking hold of men’s hopes and imaginations in every
-direction. He often plays upon it and betrays it; but he at least knows
-it is there.</p>
-
-<p>The two points at which government is developing most rapidly at the
-present moment are naturally the two where it of necessity exercises<span class="pagenum" id="Page_80">[Pg 80]</span>
-functions of nurture and protection: first, in relation to the young
-criminal, second, in relation to the poor and dependent. One of the
-latest developments is the Juvenile Courts which the large cities are
-inaugurating. Only fifteen years ago when I first went to live in an
-industrial district of Chicago, if a boy was arrested on some trifling
-charge—and dozens of them were thus arrested each month—the only
-possible way to secure another chance for him by restoring him to his
-home with an opportunity to become a law-abiding citizen, was through
-the alderman of the ward. Upon the request of a distracted relative
-or the precinct captain, the alderman would “speak to the judge”
-and secure the release of the boy. The kindness of the alderman was
-genuine, as was the gratitude of all concerned; but the inevitable
-impression remained that government was harsh, and naturally dealt out
-policemen and prisons, and that the political friend alone stood for
-kindness. That this kindness was in a measure illicit and mysterious in
-its workings made it all the more impressive.</p>
-
-<p>But so much advance has been made in so short a time as fifteen years,
-toward incorporating kindly concern for the young and a desire to keep
-them in the path of rectitude within the process of government itself,
-that in Chicago alone<span class="pagenum" id="Page_81">[Pg 81]</span> twenty-four probation officers, as they are
-called, are paid from the public funds. The wayward boy is committed
-to one of these for another chance as a part of the procedure of the
-court. He is not merely released by an act of clemency so magnificent
-and irrelevant as to dazzle him with a sense of the aldermanic power,
-but he is put under the actual care of a probation officer that he may
-do better. He is assisted to keep permanently away from the police
-courts and their allied penal institutions.</p>
-
-<p>In one of the most successful of these courts, that of Denver, the
-Judge who can point to a remarkable record with the bad boys of the
-city, plays a veritable game with them against the police force, he
-and the boys undertaking to be good without the help of repression,
-and in spite of the machinations of the police. For instance, if the
-boys who have been sentenced to the State Reform School at Golden,
-deliver themselves without the aid of the Sheriff whose duty it is to
-take them there, they not only vindicate their manliness and readiness
-“to take their medicine,” but they beat the sheriff who belongs to the
-penal machinery out of his five-dollar fee. Over this fact they openly
-triumph—a simple example, perhaps, but significant of the attitude<span class="pagenum" id="Page_82">[Pg 82]</span> of
-the well-intentioned toward repressive government.</p>
-
-<p>The Juvenile Courts are beginning to take a really parental attitude
-towards all dependent children, although for years only those orphans
-who had inherited at least a meagre property were handed over to a
-public guardian. Those whose parents had left them absolutely nothing
-were allowed to care for themselves—as if the whole body of doctrine
-contained in the phrase, “there is no wealth but life,” had never
-entered into the mind of man. Because these courts are dealing with
-the children in their social and everyday relations they have made the
-astounding discovery that even a penniless child needs the care and
-defense of the State.</p>
-
-<p>The schools for Reform are those which are inaugurating the most
-advanced education in agriculture and manual arts. A bewildered foreign
-parent comes from time to time to Hull-House, asking that his boy be
-sent to a school to learn farming, basing his request upon the fact
-that his neighbor’s boy has been sent to “a nice green, country-place.”
-It is carefully explained that the neighbor’s boy was bad, and was
-arrested and sent away because of his badness. After much conversation,
-the disappointed parent sometimes understands, but he often goes away<span class="pagenum" id="Page_83">[Pg 83]</span>
-shaking his head, and some such words as these issue: “I have been
-in this country for five years, and have never gotten anything yet.”
-At other times it is successfully explained to the man that the city
-assumes that he is looking out for himself and taking care of his own
-boy, but it ought to be possible to make him to see that if he feels
-that his son needs the education of a farm school, that it lies with
-him to agitate the subject and to vote for the man who will secure such
-schools. He might well look amazed, were this advice tendered him, for
-these questions have never been presented to him to vote upon. Because
-he does not eagerly discuss the tariff or other remote subjects which
-the political parties present to him from time to time we assume that
-he is not to be trusted to vote on the education of his child, although
-there is no doubt that the one thing his ancestors decided upon, from
-the days of bows and arrows, was the sort of training each one should
-give his son.</p>
-
-<p>The fine education that is given to a juvenile offender may indicate
-a certain compunction on the part of the State. Quite as men formerly
-gloried in warfare and now apologize for it, as they formerly went
-out to spoil their enemies and now go to civilize them, so civil
-governments, while continuing to maintain prisons, have become<span class="pagenum" id="Page_84">[Pg 84]</span> more
-or less ashamed of them, and are already experimenting in better
-ways to elevate and reform criminals than by the way of violence and
-imprisonment. We have already said in America that neither a gallows
-nor an unmitigated prison shall ever exist for a child.</p>
-
-<p>In the matter of public charities, also, we are not timid as to
-extending the function of the government. We build enormous city
-hospitals and almhouses; we care with tenderness for the defective and
-the dependent; but for that great mass of people just beyond the line,
-from whom they are constantly recruited, we do practically nothing.
-It has been said that if a workingman in New York falls a victim to
-pneumonia, he is taken to a hospital and given skilled treatment; if it
-leaves him tubercular the city will have a care over him, and valiantly
-will stand by, putting him into a public sanatorium, providing him
-with nutritious food and fresh air until his recovery. But if he is
-turned away from the hospital without tuberculosis, merely too depleted
-and wretched to go back to his regular employment, then the city can
-do nothing for him unless he be ready to call himself an out-and-out
-pauper. We are afraid of the notion of governmental function which
-would minister to the primitive needs of the mass of the people,
-although we are<span class="pagenum" id="Page_85">[Pg 85]</span> quite ready to care for him whom misfortune or disease
-has made the exception. It is really the rank and file, the average
-citizen, who is ignored by the government, while he works out his real
-problems through other agencies, although he is scolded for staying at
-home on election day, and for refusing to be interested in issues which
-really do not concern him.</p>
-
-<p>It is comparatively easy to understand the punitive point of view which
-seeks to suppress, or the philanthropic which seeks to palliate; but
-it is much more difficult to formulate that city government which is
-adapted to our present normal living. As over against the survivals
-of the first two, excellent and necessary as they are, we have but
-the few public parks and baths, the few band concerts and recreation
-piers—always excepting, of course, the public schools and the social
-activities slowly centering around them; for public education has long
-been a passion in America, and we seem to have been willing to make
-that an exception to our general theory of government.</p>
-
-<p>While governmental functions have shown this remarkable adaptation
-and growth in relation to the youth, whether he be in the public
-schools, in the Juvenile Court or in the reformatory, we hesitate
-to assume toward the adult this temper of<span class="pagenum" id="Page_86">[Pg 86]</span> the educator who humbly
-follows and at the same confidently leads the little child. While the
-State spends millions of dollars and employs thousands of servants to
-nurture and heal the sick and defective, it steadfastly refuses to
-extend its kindliness to the normal working man. The Socialists alone
-constantly appeal for this extension. They refuse, however, to deal
-with the present State and constantly take refuge in the formulae of
-a new scholasticism. Their orators are busily engaged in establishing
-two substitutes for human nature which they call “proletarian” and
-“capitalist.” They ignore the fact that varying, imperfect human nature
-is incalculable, and that to eliminate its varied and constantly
-changing elements is to face all the mistakes and miscalculations which
-gathered around the “fallen man,” or the “economic man,” or any other
-of the fixed norms which have from time to time been substituted for
-expanding and developing human life. In time “the proletarian” and “the
-capitalist” will become the impedimenta which it will be necessary to
-clear away in order to make room for the mass of living and breathing
-citizens with whom self-government must eventually deal.</p>
-
-<p>There is no doubt that the existence of the mass, the mere size of the
-modern city, increases the difficulty of the situation. Charles Booth’s
-maps<span class="pagenum" id="Page_87">[Pg 87]</span> portraying the standard of living for the people of London afford
-almost the only attempt at a general social survey of a modern city, at
-least so far as it may be predetermined from the standard of income.
-From his accompanying twelve volumes may be deduced the occupations of
-the people with their real wages, their family budget and their culture
-level, and, to a certain extent, their recreations and spiritual life.
-If one gives one’s self over to a moment of musing on this mass of
-information, so huge and so accurate, one is almost instinctively aware
-that any radical changes, so much needed in the blackest districts,
-must largely come from forces outside the life of the people. An
-enlarged mental life must come from the educationalist, increased
-wages from the business interests, alleviation of suffering from the
-philanthropists. What vehicle of correction is provided for the people
-themselves, what device has been invented for loosing that kindliness
-and mutual aid which is the marvel of all charity visitors? What broad
-basis has been laid down for a modification of their most genuine and
-pressing needs through their own initiative? The traditional Government
-expresses its activity in keeping the streets clean and the district
-lighted and policed. It is only during the last quarter of a century
-that the London County Council has<span class="pagenum" id="Page_88">[Pg 88]</span> erected decent houses, public
-baths, and many other devices for the purer social life of the people.
-American cities have gone no further, although they presumably started
-at workingmen’s representation a hundred years ago, so completely were
-the founders misled by the name of government, and the temptation to
-substitute the form of political democracy for real self-government
-dealing with advancing social ideals. Even now London has twenty-eight
-Borough Councils, in addition to the London County Council itself,
-fifteen hundred direct representatives of the people, as over against
-seventy in Chicago although the latter city has a population one-half
-as large. Paris has twenty Mayors, with corresponding machinery for
-local government, as over against the New York concentration in one
-huge City Hall, too often corrupt.</p>
-
-<p>In Germany, perhaps more than anywhere else, the government has
-come to concern itself with the primitive essential needs of its
-working-people. In their behalf, the Government has forced industry,
-in the person of the large manufacturers, to make an alliance with
-it. The manufacturers are taxed for accident insurance of workingmen,
-for old-age pensions and sick benefits; and a project is being formed
-in which they shall bear the large share of insurance against<span class="pagenum" id="Page_89">[Pg 89]</span>
-non-employment when it has been made clear that non-employment
-is the result of an economic crisis brought about through the
-maladministration of finance.</p>
-
-<p>Germany proposes to regulate the maximum amount of rent which
-landlords of certain types of houses may be permitted to require,
-quite as the usury laws limit the maximum amount of interest which
-may be demanded. And yet industry in Germany has flourished, and
-this control on behalf of the normal workingman as he faces life in
-his daily vocation has apparently not checked its systematic growth,
-nor limited its place in the world’s market. As a result of this
-constant supervision of industry, the German police although a part of
-a military government, are constantly employed in the regulation of
-social affairs; and in these branches of government it is remarked that
-they are dropping their military tone and assuming toward the people
-the attitude of helpers and protectors. The police force in Germany is
-the lowest executive organ of the interior government and there are,
-therefore, as many kinds of police departments as there are different
-departments in this interior government. They follow the Government
-inspectors of the forest, the railways, the fields and roads, to see
-that their instructions are obeyed. In the Department<span class="pagenum" id="Page_90">[Pg 90]</span> of Public
-Health it is the police officers who finally enforce instructions in
-regard to vaccination, meat inspection, sale of food-stuffs, and the
-transportation of animals; in the department of factory inspection
-the police not only enforce the provisions of the factory laws, but
-they are responsible for the books in which the wages paid to minors
-are recorded; and it is from the police stations that the cards of
-the Government insurance for working-people are issued. Any special
-investigation ordered by the legislature is, as a matter of course,
-undertaken by the police. These varied activities, of course, require
-men of education and ability, and the very extension of function has
-broken down the military ideal in the country where that ideal is most
-firmly intrenched. But in a Republic founded upon a revulsion from
-oppressive government we still keep the police close to their negative
-rôle of preserving order and arresting the criminal. The varied
-functions they perform in Germany would be impossible in America,
-because it would be hotly resented by the American business man who
-will not brook any governmental interference in industrial affairs.
-The inherited instinct that government is naturally oppressive, and
-that its inroads must be checked, has made it a matter of principle and
-patriotism to keep the functions of government<span class="pagenum" id="Page_91">[Pg 91]</span> more restricted and
-more military than has become true in military countries.</p>
-
-<p>Almost every Sunday in the Italian quarter in which I live various
-mutual benefit societies march with fife and drum and with a brave
-showing of banners, celebrating their achievement in having surrounded
-themselves by at least a thin wall of protection against disaster,
-upon having set up their mutual good will against the day of
-misfortune. These parades have all the emblems of patriotism; indeed,
-the associations present the primitive core of patriotism, brothers
-standing by each other against hostile forces from without. I assure
-you that no Fourth of July celebration, no rejoicing over the birth
-of an heir to the Italian throne, equals in heartiness and sincerity
-these simple celebrations. Again one longs to pour into the government
-of their adopted country all this affection and zeal, this real
-patriotism. A system of State insurance would be a very simple device
-and secure a large return.</p>
-
-<p>Are we in America retaining eighteenth-century traditions, while
-Germany is gradually evolving into a Government logically fitted to
-cope with the industrial situation of the twentieth century? Do we
-so fail to apprehend what democracy is, that we are really afraid to
-extend the functions of municipal administration? Have we lost that<span class="pagenum" id="Page_92">[Pg 92]</span>
-most conservative of all beliefs—the belief in the average man, and
-thereby forfeited Aristotle’s ideal of a city “where men live a common
-life for noble ends”?</p>
-
-<hr class="chap x-ebookmaker-drop">
-
-<div class="chapter">
-<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_93">[Pg 93]</span></p>
-<h2 class="nobreak" id="CHAPTER_IV">CHAPTER IV<br><span class="small">MILITARISM AND INDUSTRIAL LEGISLATION</span></h2></div>
-
-
-<p>American cities have been slow to consider industrial questions as
-germane to government, and the Federal authorities have persistently
-treated the millions of immigrants who arrive every year upon a
-political theory and method adopted a century ago, because both of
-them ignore the fact that the organization of industry has completed
-a revolution during that period. The gigantic task of standardizing
-the successive nations of immigrants throughout the country has fallen
-upon workmen because they alone cannot ignore the actual industrial
-situation. To thousands of workmen the immigration problem is a
-question of holding a job against a constantly lowering standard of
-living, and to withstand this stream of “raw labor” means to them the
-maintenance of industrial efficiency and of life itself. Workingmen
-are engaged in a desperate struggle to maintain a standard of wages
-against the constant arrival of unskilled immigrants at the rate of
-three-quarters of a million a year, at the<span class="pagenum" id="Page_94">[Pg 94]</span> very period when the
-elaboration of machinery permits the largest use of unskilled men.</p>
-
-<p>It may be owing to the fact that the workingman is brought into direct
-contact with the situation as a desperate problem of a living wage
-against starvation; it may be that wisdom is at her old trick of
-residing in the hearts of the simple, or that this new idealism, which
-is that of a reasonable life and labor, must, from the very nature of
-things, proceed from those who labor; or possibly it may be because
-amelioration arises whence it is so sorely needed; but certainly it is
-true, that, while the rest of the country talks of assimilation as if
-it were a huge digestive apparatus, the man with whom the immigrant
-has come most sharply into competition, has been forced into fraternal
-relations with him.</p>
-
-<p>Curiously enough, however, as soon as the immigrant situation is
-frankly regarded as an industrial one, as these men must regard it,
-the political aspects of the industrial situation is revealed in the
-fact that trade organizations which openly concern themselves with
-the immigration problem on its industrial side, quickly take on the
-paraphernalia and machinery which have hitherto associated themselves
-only with governmental life and control. The trades unions have worked
-out all over again local autonomy, with central<span class="pagenum" id="Page_95">[Pg 95]</span> councils and national
-representative bodies and the use of the referendum vote; and they also
-exhibit many of the features of political corruption and manipulation.</p>
-
-<p>The first real lesson in self-government to many immigrants has come
-through the organization of labor unions, and it could come in no
-other way, for the union alone has appealed to their necessities. One
-sees the first indication of an idealism arising out of these primal
-necessities, and at moments one dares to hope that it may be sturdy
-enough and sufficiently founded upon experience to make some impression
-upon the tremendous immigration situation.</p>
-
-<p>The movements embodying a new idealism have traditionally sought refuge
-with those who are near to starvation. Although the spiritual struggle
-is associated with the solitary garret of the impassioned dreamer,
-it may be that the idealism fitted to our industrial democracy will
-be evolved in crowded sewer ditches and in noisy factories. It may
-be contended that this remarkable coming together of the workingman
-and the immigrant has been the result of an economic pressure, and is
-without merit or idealism, and that the trades union record on Chinese
-exclusion and negro discrimination has been damaging. Be that as it
-may, this assimilation between the<span class="pagenum" id="Page_96">[Pg 96]</span> immigrant and the workingman has
-exhibited amazing strength, which may be illustrated from two careful
-studies made in two different parts of the country.</p>
-
-<p>To quote first from a study made from the University of Wisconsin
-of the stock yards strike which took place in Chicago in 1904<a id="FNanchor_6" href="#Footnote_6" class="fnanchor">[6]</a>:
-“Perhaps the fact of the greatest social significance is that this
-was not merely a strike of skilled labor for the unskilled, but was
-a strike of Americanized Irish, Germans, and Bohemians, in behalf of
-Slovaks, Poles, and Lithuanians.... This substitution of races in the
-stock yards has been a continuing process for twenty years. The older
-nationalities have already disappeared from the unskilled occupations,
-and the substitution of races has evidently run along the line of
-lower standard of living. The latest arrivals, the Lithuanians and
-Slovaks, are probably the most oppressed of the peasants of Europe.”
-The visitors who attended the crowded meetings of the strikers during
-the summer of 1904 and heard the same address successively translated
-by interpreters into six or eight languages, who saw the respect
-shown to the most uncouth of the speakers by the skilled American men
-representing<span class="pagenum" id="Page_97">[Pg 97]</span> a distinctly superior standard of life and thought, could
-never doubt the power of the labor organizations for amalgamation,
-whatever opinion they might hold concerning their other values. This
-may be said in spite of the fact that great industrial disturbances
-have arisen from the under-cutting of wages by the lowering of racial
-standard. Certainly the most notable of these have taken place in those
-industries and at those places in which the importation of immigrants
-has been deliberately fostered as a wage-lowering weapon; and even in
-those disturbances and under the shock and strain of a long strike,
-disintegration did not come along the line of race cleavage.</p>
-
-<p>The other study was made in the anthracite coal fields, and was
-undertaken from the University of Pennsylvania<a id="FNanchor_7" href="#Footnote_7" class="fnanchor">[7]</a>: “The United
-Mine Workers of America is taking men of a score of nationalities,
-English-speaking and Slav, men of widely different creeds, languages,
-and customs, and of varying powers of industrial competition, and is
-welding them into an industrial brotherhood, each part of which can
-at least understand of the others that they are working for one great
-and common end. This bond of unionism is stronger than one can readily
-imagine who has not seen its mysterious workings or who has not<span class="pagenum" id="Page_98">[Pg 98]</span> been
-a victim of its members’ newly found enthusiasm. It is to-day the
-strongest tie that can bind together 147,000 mine workers and the
-thousands dependent upon them. It is more than religion, more than the
-social ties which hold together members of the same community.”</p>
-
-<p>It was during a remarkable struggle on the part of this amalgamation
-of men from all countries, that the United States government, in spite
-of itself, was driven to take a hand in an industrial situation,
-owing to the long strain and the intolerable suffering entailed upon
-the whole country. Even then, however, the Government endeavored to
-confine its investigation to the mere commercial questions of tonnage
-and freight rates with their political implications, and it was only
-when an aroused and moralized public opinion insisted upon it that
-the national commission was driven to consider the human aspects of
-the case. Because of this public opinion, columns of newspapers and
-days of investigation were given to the discussion of the deeds of
-violence, discussions having nothing to do with the original demands
-of the strikers and entering only into the value set upon human life
-by each of the contesting parties. Did the union encourage violence
-against non-union men, or did it really do everything to suppress
-violence? Did it live up to its creed<span class="pagenum" id="Page_99">[Pg 99]</span> which was to maintain a standard
-of living that families might be properly housed and protected from
-debilitating toil and disease, and that children might be nurtured into
-American citizenship? Did the operators protect their men as far as
-possible from mine damp, from length of hours proven by experience to
-be exhausting? Did they pay a wage to the mine laborer sufficient to
-allow him to send his children to school? Questions such as these, a
-study of the human problem, invaded the commission day after day during
-the sitting. One felt for the moment the first wave of a rising tide
-of humanitarianism, until the normal ideals of the laborer to secure
-food and shelter for his family, a security for his own old age, and
-a larger opportunity for his children became the ideals of democratic
-government.</p>
-
-<p>Let us imagine the result if, during the long anthracite strike, the
-humane instinct had so over-mastered the minds of the strikers, and so
-exalted their passions that they had lifted a hand against no man, even
-though he seemed to be endangering their cause before their eyes. Such
-a result might have come about, partly because the destruction of life
-had become abhorrent and impossible to them engaged as they were in
-the endeavor to raise life in the coal regions to a higher level, and
-partly because they would have<span class="pagenum" id="Page_100">[Pg 100]</span> scorned to destroy an enemy in order
-to achieve a mere negative result when the power lay within themselves
-to convert him into an ally, when they might have made him a source
-of help and power, a comrade of the same undertaking. If the element
-of battle, of mere self-seeking, could be eliminated from strikes,
-if they could remain a sheer uprising of the oppressed and underpaid
-to a self-conscious recognition of their condition, so unified, so
-irresistible as to sweep all the needy within its flood, we should have
-a tide rising, not to destruction, but to beneficence. Let us imagine
-the state of public feeling if there had been absolutely no act of
-violence traceable, directly or indirectly, to the union miners; if
-during the long months of the strike the great body of miners could
-have added the sanction of sustained conduct to their creed. Public
-sympathy would have led to an understanding of the need these miners
-were trying to meet, and the American nation itself might have been
-ready to ask for legislation concerning the minimum wage, and for
-protection to life and limb, equal to the legislation of New Zealand
-or Germany. But because the element of warfare unhappily did exist,
-government got back to its old business of repression.</p>
-
-<p>To preserve law and order is obviously the<span class="pagenum" id="Page_101">[Pg 101]</span> function of government
-everywhere; and yet in our complicated modern society, especially as
-thousands of varied peoples are crowded into cities, it is not always
-easy to see just where real social order lies. The officials themselves
-are sometimes perplexed, and at other times deliberately use the
-devices of government for their own ends. We may take once more in
-illustration the great strike in the Chicago stock-yards. The immediate
-object of the strike was the protection of the wages of the unskilled
-men from a cut of one cent per hour, although, of course, the unions
-of skilled men felt that this first invasion of the wages increased
-through the efforts of the union, would be but the entering wedge of an
-attempt to cut wages in all the trades represented in the stock-yards.
-Owing to the refusal on the part of the unions to accept arbitration
-offered by the packers at an embarrassing moment, and because of the
-failure of the unions to carry out the terms of a contract, the strike
-in its early stages completely lost the sympathy of that large part of
-the public dominated by ideals of business honor and fair dealing. It
-lost, too, the sympathy of that growing body of organized labor which
-is steadily advancing in a regard for the validity of the contract, and
-is faithfully cherishing the hope that in time the trades unions<span class="pagenum" id="Page_102">[Pg 102]</span> may
-universally attain an accredited business standing.</p>
-
-<p>The leaders after the first ten days were, therefore, forced to
-make the most of the purely human appeal which lay in the situation
-itself, that 30,000 men, including the allied trades, were losing
-weeks of wages, with a possible chance of the destruction of their
-unions on behalf of the unskilled who were the newly arrived Poles
-and Lithuanians, unable as yet to look out for themselves. Owing
-to the irregular and limited hours of work—a condition quite like
-that prevailing on the London docks before the great strike of the
-dockers—the weekly wage of these unskilled men was exceptionally low,
-and the plea of the strikers was based upon the duty of the strong
-to the weak. A chivalric call was issued that the standard of life
-might be raised to that designated as American, and that this mass of
-unskilled men might secure an education for their children. Of course
-no appeal could have been so strong as this purely human one which
-united for weeks thousands of men of a score of nationalities into that
-solidarity which only comes through a self-sacrificing devotion to an
-absorbing cause.</p>
-
-<p>The strike involved much suffering and many unforeseen complications.
-At the end of eight<span class="pagenum" id="Page_103">[Pg 103]</span> weeks the union leaders made the best terms
-possible. Through these terms the skilled workers were guaranteed
-against a reduction in wages, but no provision was made for the
-unskilled in whose behalf the strike had at first been undertaken.
-Although the hard-pressed leaders were willing to make this concession,
-the politicians in the meanwhile had seen the great value of the human
-sentiment which bases its appeal on the need of the under dog and which
-had successfully united this mass of workingmen into a new comradeship
-with the immigrants. The appeal was infinitely more valuable than any
-merely political cry, and the fact that the final terms of settlement
-were submitted to a referendum vote at once gave the local politicians
-a chance to avail themselves of this big, loosely defined sympathy.
-They did avail themselves of this in so dramatic a manner that they
-almost succeeded, solely upon that appeal, in taking the strike out of
-the hands of the legitimate officers and placing it in their own hands
-for their own political ends.</p>
-
-<p>The situation was a typical one, exemplifying the real aim of popular
-government with its concern for primitive needs, forced to seek
-expression outside of the organized channels of government. If the
-militia could have been called in, government would have been placed
-even more<span class="pagenum" id="Page_104">[Pg 104]</span> dramatically in the position of the oppressor of popular
-self-government. The phenomenal good order, the comparative lack of
-violence on the part of the striking workmen, gave no chance for the
-bringing in of the militia. The city politician was of course very much
-disappointed, for it would have afforded him an opening to put the
-odium of this traditional opposition of government, an opposition which
-has always been most dramatically embodied in the soldier, upon the
-political party dominating the State but not the city. It would have
-given the city politician an excellent opportunity to show the concern
-of himself and his party for the real people, as over against the
-attitude of the party dominating the State. But because the militia was
-not called, his scheme failed, and the legitimate strike leaders who,
-although they passed through much tribulation because of this political
-interference, did not eventually lose control.</p>
-
-<p>The situation in the Chicago stock-yards also afforded an excellent
-epitome of the fact that government so often finds itself, not only in
-opposition to the expressed will of the people making the demand at the
-moment, but apparently against the best instincts of the mass of the
-citizens as a whole.</p>
-
-<p>For years the city administration had so protected<span class="pagenum" id="Page_105">[Pg 105]</span> the property
-interests invested in the stock-yards, that none of the sanitary
-ordinances had ever been properly enforced. The sickening stench and
-the scum on the branch of the river known as Bubbly Creek at times
-made that section of the city unendurable. The smoke ordinances were
-openly ignored, nor did the meat inspector ever seriously interfere
-with business, being quite willing to have meat sold in Chicago which
-had not passed the inspection for foreign markets. The water steals,
-too, for which the stock-yards were at one time notorious, must have
-been more or less known to certain officials. But all this merely
-corrupted a limited number of inspectors, and although their corruption
-was complete and involved entire administrations, it did not actually
-touch large numbers of persons. During the strike of 1904, however,
-1,200 policemen, actual men possessed of human sensibilities, were
-called upon to patrol the yards inside and out. There is no doubt
-that the police inspector of the district thoroughly represented the
-alliance of the City Hall with the business interests, that he did
-not mean to discover anything which was derogatory to the packers nor
-to embarrass them in any way during the conduct of the strike. Had
-these 1,200 men, more than a regiment in numbers, been a regiment in
-training and tradition, they,<span class="pagenum" id="Page_106">[Pg 106]</span> too, would have seen nothing, and would
-have been content at heart, as they were obliged to be in conduct, to
-have arrested the strikers on the slightest provocation, and to have
-protected the strike-breakers.</p>
-
-<p>But they were, in point of fact, called upon to face a very peculiar
-situation, because of the type of men and women who formed the bulk
-of the strike-breakers, and because, during the first weeks of the
-strike, these men and women were kept constantly inside the yards,
-day and night. In order to hold them at all, discipline outside of
-working hours was thoroughly relaxed, and the policemen in charge
-of the yards, while there ostensibly to enforce law and order, were
-obliged every night to connive at prize-fighting, at open gambling, and
-at prostitution. They were there, not to enforce law and order as it
-defines itself in the minds of the bulk of healthy-minded citizens, but
-only to keep the strikers from molesting the non-union workers. This
-was certainly commendable, but, after all, only part of their real duty.</p>
-
-<p>Because they were normal men living in the midst of normal life and
-not in barracks, they were shocked by the law-breaking which they were
-ordered to protect, and much drawn in sympathy to the strikers whom
-they were supposed<span class="pagenum" id="Page_107">[Pg 107]</span> to regard as public enemies. An investigator who
-interviewed one hundred policemen found only one who did not frankly
-extol the virtues of the strikers as over against the shocking vices of
-the imported men. This, of course, was an extreme case brought about by
-the unusual and peculiar type of the imported strike-breakers. There
-is, however, trustworthy evidence incorporated in affidavits which were
-at the time submitted to the Mayor of Chicago, concerning the unlawful
-conduct of the men who were under the protection of the city police.</p>
-
-<p>It was hard for a patriot not to feel jealous of the union and of the
-enthusiasm of those newly emigrated citizens. They poured out their
-gratitude and affection upon this first big friendly force which had
-offered them help in their desperate struggle in the New World. This
-devotion, this comradeship, and this fine <i>esprit de corps</i> should
-have been won by the Government itself from these newly arrived,
-scared, and untrained citizens. The union was that which had concerned
-itself with the real struggle for life, shelter, a chance to work, and
-bread for their children. It had come to them in a language they could
-understand, through men with interests akin to their own, and it gave
-them both their first chance to express themselves through a democratic
-vote,<span class="pagenum" id="Page_108">[Pg 108]</span> and an opportunity to register by a ballot their real opinion
-upon a very important matter.</p>
-
-<p>They used the referendum votes, the latest and perhaps the most clever
-device of democratic government, and yet they used it to decide a
-question which the government supposed to be quite outside its realm.
-When they left the old country, the government of America held their
-deepest hopes, and represented that which they believed would obtain
-for them the fullness of life denied them in the lands of oppressive
-governments. It is a curious commentary on the fact that we have not
-yet attained self-government when the real and legitimate objects of
-men’s desires must still be incorporated in those voluntary groups for
-which the government, when it does its best, can only afford protection
-from interference. As the religious revivalist looks with longing upon
-the fervor of a single-tax meeting, as the orthodox Jew sees his son
-stay away from Yom Kippur service in order to pour all his religious
-fervor, his precious zeal for righteousness which has been gathered
-through the centuries, into the Socialist Labor Party—so a patriot
-finds himself exclaiming to the immigrant, like another Andrea del
-Sarto to his wife, “Oh, but what do they—what do they to please you
-more?”</p>
-
-<p>The stock-yards strike afforded an example of<span class="pagenum" id="Page_109">[Pg 109]</span> the national appeal
-subordinated to an appeal made in the name of labor. During the early
-stages of the strike it was discovered that newly arrived Macedonians
-were taking many of the places vacated by the strikers. One of the
-most touching scenes during the strike was the groups of Macedonians
-who would sit together in the twilight playing on primitive pipes
-singularly like the one which is associated with the great god Pan. The
-slender song would carry amazingly in the smoke-bedimmed air, affecting
-the spectator with a curious sense of incongruity.</p>
-
-<p>When the organized labor of Chicago discovered that the strikers’
-places were taken by Greeks, the unions threatened, unless the Greeks
-were “called off,” to boycott the Greek fruit-dealers all over the
-city, who with their street stands are singularly dependent upon
-the patronage of workingmen. The fact that the strike-breakers were
-Macedonians, as it happened, was an additional advantage at the
-moment; for the Greeks have been much concerned to make it clear that
-Macedonia belongs to Greece, and have hotly resented the efforts of
-Bulgaria to establish a protectorate over the country. They therefore
-responded at once to this acknowledgment of their claim, and, partly to
-show that the Macedonians and Greeks were countrymen, partly because
-they resented<span class="pagenum" id="Page_110">[Pg 110]</span> the implication that a Greek could act a cowardly part
-in any situation, and also, doubtless, because they were merchants
-threatened with loss of trade, they made superhuman efforts to clear
-the yards of Macedonians. This they accomplished in a remarkably short
-time. So reckless were they in the methods they used that it was
-common gossip throughout the Greek colony that strike-breakers would
-be refused the comforts of religion by the Greek priests in the city,
-although doubtless this rumor was unfounded. This utter recklessness
-of method, this determination to deter strike-breaking at any cost,
-is, of course, a revelation of the war element which is an essential
-part of any strike. The appeal to “loyalty” is the nearest approach to
-a moral appeal which can be safely made in the midst of a war of any
-sort. During a long strike one result of the non-moral appeal is to
-confuse the situation so that it becomes utterly impossible to tell how
-many men refuse to become strike-breakers because they are terrorized
-and how many stay away from conviction. The non-moral appeal not only
-sins against the principles advocated by trades unionists, but it
-contradicts itself and brings great confusion into the situation, as
-war ideals always do when thrust into a peaceful society. It was, for
-instance, quite impossible to tell whether the lowering in<span class="pagenum" id="Page_111">[Pg 111]</span> the type
-of man who was willing to take a striker’s place, so that at last
-only very ignorant men from the southern plantations could be induced
-to work, was due to a species of class consciousness, a response to
-the demand felt so strongly by labor men—“Thou shalt not take thy
-neighbor’s job”—or whether workingmen are becoming so afraid to take
-striker’s places that these places must at last be given to men who
-have come from such remote parts of the country that “they do not know
-enough to be afraid.” The unions themselves could take no accounting of
-their real strength because of the terrorism which had become thrust
-into the situation. And yet all that the stock-yards workers were
-demanding through this long and disastrous strike, was the minimum
-wage which has been guaranteed by conservative governments elsewhere,
-and is recognized even in the United States in much governmental work
-under the contracts of civil or Federal authorities. So timid are
-American cities, however, in dealing with this perfectly reasonable
-subject of wages in its relation to municipal employees, that when they
-do prescribe a minimum wage for city contract work, they allow it to
-fall into the hands of the petty politician and to become part of a
-political game, making no effort to give it a dignified treatment in
-relation to the cost of living<span class="pagenum" id="Page_112">[Pg 112]</span> and to the margin of leisure. In this
-the English cities have anticipated us, both as to time and legitimate
-procedure. Have Americans formed a sort of “imperialism of virtue,”
-holding on to preconceived ideals of government and insisting that
-they must fit all the people who come to our shores, even though they
-crush the most promising bits of self-expression in the process? Is the
-American attitude toward self-government like that of the Anglo-Saxon
-towards civilization, save that he goes forth to rule all the nations
-of the earth by one pattern, while we remain at home and bid them to
-rule themselves by one pattern? We firmly decline not only to consider
-matters of industry and commerce as germane to government, but we also
-decline to bring men together upon that most natural and inevitable of
-all foundations, their industrial needs.</p>
-
-<p>The government which refuses to consider matters of this sort, or at
-least waits until their neglect becomes a scandal before it consents to
-deal with them, as a result of this caution forces the most patriotic
-citizens to ignore the Government and to embody their scruples and
-hopes of progress in voluntary organizations. To be afraid to extend
-the functions of government may be to lose what we have. A government
-has always received feeble support from its constituents as soon as
-its<span class="pagenum" id="Page_113">[Pg 113]</span> demands appeared childish or remote. Citizens inevitably neglect
-or abandon civic duty, when their government no longer embodies their
-genuine desires. It is useless to hypnotize ourselves by unreal talk of
-colonial ideas, and of our patriotic duty towards immigrants as though
-the situation was one demanding the passage of a set of resolutions
-when we fail to realize that the nation can be saved only by patriots
-who are possessed of a contemporaneous knowledge.</p>
-
-<p>As industrial relations imply peaceful relations, under a certain
-rough reorganization and reconstruction of governmental functions
-which the association of labor presents, it is inevitable that in
-its international aspects the association should formally advocate
-universal peace. Workmen have always realized, however feebly and
-vaguely they may have expressed it, that it is they who in all ages
-have borne the heaviest burden of privation and suffering imposed on
-the world by the military spirit.</p>
-
-<p>The first international organization founded, not to promote a
-colorless peace, but to advance and develop the common life of all
-nations, was founded in London in 1864 by workingmen, and was called
-simply “The International Association of Workingmen.” They recognized
-that a supreme interest raised all workingmen above the<span class="pagenum" id="Page_114">[Pg 114]</span> prejudice of
-race, and united them by wider and deeper principles than those by
-which they were separated into nations. They hoped that as religion,
-science, art, had become international, so now at last labor might take
-its place as an international interest. A few years later, at its third
-congress in Brussels they recommended that in case of war a universal
-strike be declared.</p>
-
-<p>There is a growing conviction among workingmen of all countries
-that, whatever may be accomplished by a national war, however moral
-the supposed aim of such a war, there is one inevitable result—an
-increased standing army, the soldiers of which are non-producers, and
-must be fed by the workers.</p>
-
-<p>The surprising growth of Socialism, at the moment, is due largely to
-the fact that it is the only political party upon an international
-basis, and also that it frankly ventures its future upon a better
-industrial organization. These two aspects have had much more to do
-with its hold in industrial neighborhoods than have its philosophic
-tenets or the impassioned appeal of its propagandists. The Socialists
-are making almost the sole attempt to preach a morality sufficiently
-all-embracing and international to keep pace with even that material
-internationalism which has standarized the threads of screws and the
-size of<span class="pagenum" id="Page_115">[Pg 115]</span> bolts, so that machines may become interchangeable from one
-country to another. It is the same sort of internationalism which
-Mazzini preached when distracted Italy was making her desperate
-struggle for a unified and national life. He issued his remarkable
-address to her workingmen and solemnly told them that the life of the
-nation could not be made secure until her patriots were ready to die
-for human issues. He saw, earlier than most men, that the desire to
-be at unity with all human beings, to claim the sense of a universal
-affection is a force not to be ignored. He believed that it might
-even then be strong enough to devour the flimsy stuff called national
-honor, glory, and prestige, which incite to war and induce workingmen
-to trample over each other’s fields and to destroy the results of each
-other’s labor.</p>
-
-<p>Workingmen dream of an industrialism which shall be the handmaid of
-a commerce ministering to an increased power of consumption among
-the producers of the world, binding them together in a genuine
-internationalism. Existing commerce has long ago reached its
-international stage, but it has been the result of business aggression
-and constantly appeals for military defense and for the forcing of new
-markets. In so far as commerce has rested upon the successful capture
-of<span class="pagenum" id="Page_116">[Pg 116]</span> the resources of the workers, it has been a relic of the mediaeval
-baron issuing forth to seize the merchants’ boats as they passed his
-castle on the Rhine. It has logically lent itself to warfare, and is,
-indeed, the modern representative of conquest. As its prototype rested
-upon slavery and vassalage, so this commerce is founded upon a contempt
-for the worker and believes that he can live on low wages. It assumes
-that his legitimate wants are the animal ones comprising merely food
-and shelter and the cost of replacement. The industrialism of which
-this commerce is a part, exhibits this same contemptuous attitude, but
-it is more easily extended to immigrants than to any other sort of
-workmen because they seem further away from a common standard of life.
-This attitude toward the immigrant simply illustrates once more that it
-is around the deeply significant idea of the standard of life that our
-industrial problems of to-day centre. The desire for a higher standard
-of living in reality forms the base of all the forward movements of the
-working class. “The significance of the standard of life lies not so
-much in the fact that for each of us it is different, as that for all
-of us it is progressive,”<a id="FNanchor_8" href="#Footnote_8" class="fnanchor">[8]</a> constantly invading new realms. To imagine
-that for immigrants it is merely a question<span class="pagenum" id="Page_117">[Pg 117]</span> of tin cups and plates
-stored in a bunk <i>versus</i> a white cloth and a cottage table, and
-that all goes well if sewing-machines and cottage-organs reach the
-first generation of immigrants, and fashionable dressmakers and pianos
-the second, is of course a most untutored interpretation. Until the
-standard of life is apprehended in its real significance and made
-the crux of the immigrant situation, as recent economists are making
-the power of consumption the test of a nation’s prosperity, we shall
-continue to ignore the most obvious and natural basis for understanding
-and mutual citizenship.</p>
-
-<p>Because workmen have been forced to consider this standard of living
-in regard to immigrants as well as themselves, they have made genuine
-efforts toward amalgamation. This is perhaps easily explained, for,
-after all, the man in this country who realizes human equality is not
-he who repeats the formula of the eighteenth century, but he who has
-learned that the “idea of equality is an outgrowth of man’s primary
-relations with nature. Birth, growth, nutrition, reproduction, death,
-are the great levelers that remind us of the essential equality of
-human life. It is with the guarantee of equal opportunities to play
-our parts well in these primary processes that government is chiefly
-concerned”<a id="FNanchor_9" href="#Footnote_9" class="fnanchor">[9]</a> and not merely with the repression<span class="pagenum" id="Page_118">[Pg 118]</span> of the vicious, nor
-with guarding the rights of property. All that devotion of the trades
-union for the real issues and trials of life could, of course, easily
-be turned into a passion for self-government and for the development
-of the national life if we were really democratic from the modern
-evolutionary standpoint, and held our town-meetings upon the topics of
-vital concern.</p>
-
-<p>So long, however, as the Government declines to concern itself with
-these deeper issues involved in the standard of life and the industrial
-status of thousands of its citizens, we must lose it.</p>
-
-<p>If progress were inaugurated by those members of the community who
-possess the widest knowledge and superior moral insight, then social
-amelioration might be brought about without the bungling and mistakes
-which so distress us all. But, over and over again, salutary changes
-are projected and carried through by men of even less than the average
-ethical development, because their positions in life have brought them
-in contact with the ills of existing arrangements. To quote from John
-Morley: “In matters of social improvement, the most common reason
-why one hits upon a point of progress and not another, is that one
-happens to be more directly touched than the other by the unimproved
-practice.”<span class="pagenum" id="Page_119">[Pg 119]</span><a id="FNanchor_10" href="#Footnote_10" class="fnanchor">[10]</a> Perhaps this is a sufficient explanation of the fact
-that untrained workmen are entrusted with the difficult task of
-industrial amelioration and adjustment, while the rest of the community
-often seems ignorant of the truth that institutions which do not march
-with the extension of human needs and relationships are dead, and may
-easily become a deterrent to social progress. Unless we subordinate
-class interests and class feeling to a broader conception of social
-progress, unless we take pains to come in contact with the surging and
-diverse peoples who make up the nation, we cannot hope to attain a sane
-social development. We need rigid enforcement of the existing laws,
-while at the same time, we frankly admit the inadequacy of these laws,
-and work without stint for progressive regulations better fitted to
-the newer issues among which our lot is cast; for, unless the growing
-conscience is successfully embodied in legal enactment, men lose the
-habit of turning to the law for guidance and redress.</p>
-
-<p>I recall, in illustration of this, an instance which took place fifteen
-years ago. I had newly come to Chicago, fresh from the country, and had
-little idea of the social and industrial conditions in which I found
-myself on Halsted Street, when a dozen girls came from a neighboring
-factory with a grievance in regard to their wages. The<span class="pagenum" id="Page_120">[Pg 120]</span> affair could
-hardly have been called a labor difficulty. The girls had never heard
-of a trades union, and were totally unaccustomed to acting together.
-It was more in the nature of a “scrap” between themselves and their
-foreman. In the effort toward adjustment, there remains vividly in my
-memory a conversation I had with a leading judge who arbitrated the
-difficulty. He expressed his belief in the capacity of the common law
-to meet all legitimate labor difficulties as they arise. He trusted
-its remarkable adaptability to changing conditions under the decisions
-of wise and progressive judges. He contended, however, that, in order
-to adjust it to our industrial affairs, it must be interpreted, not so
-much in relation to precedents established under a judicial order which
-belongs to the past, but in reference to that newer sense of justice
-which this generation is seeking to embody in industrial relations. He
-foresaw something of the stress and storm of the industrial conflicts
-which have occurred in Chicago since then, and he expressed the hope
-that the Bench of Cook County might seize the opportunity, in this
-new and difficult situation, of dealing with labor difficulties in a
-judicial spirit.</p>
-
-<p>What a difference it would have made in the history of Chicago during
-the last fifteen years if more men had been possessed of this temper
-and<span class="pagenum" id="Page_121">[Pg 121]</span> wisdom, and had refused to countenance the use of force. If more
-men had been able to see the situation through a fresher medium; to
-apprehend that the old legal enactments were too individualistic and
-narrow; that a difference in degree may make a difference in kind;
-if they had realized that they were the first generation of American
-jurists who had to deal with a situation made novel by the fact that
-it was brought about by the coming together of two millions of people
-largely on an industrial basis!</p>
-
-<p>Our constitutions were constructed by the advanced men of the
-eighteenth century, who had studied the works of the most radical
-thinkers of that century. Radicalism then meant a more democratic
-political organization, and in its defence, they fearlessly quoted the
-Greek city and the Roman Forum. But we have come to admit that our
-present difficulties are connected with our industrial organization
-and with the lack of connection between that organization and our
-inherited democratic form of government. If self-government were
-to be inaugurated by the advanced men of the present moment, they
-would make a most careful research into those early organizations of
-village communities, folk-motes, and mirs, those primary cells of
-both industrial and political organizations, where the people<span class="pagenum" id="Page_122">[Pg 122]</span> knew
-no difference between the two, but, quite simply, met to consider in
-common discussion all that concerned their common life. They would
-investigate the crafts, guilds, and artels, which combine government
-with daily occupations, as did the self-governing university and free
-town. They would seek for the connection between the liberty-loving
-mediaeval city and its free creative architecture, that art which
-combines the greatest variety of artists and artisans. They would
-not altogether ignore the “compulsion of origins” and the fact that
-our present civilization is most emphatically an industrial one. In
-Germany, when the Social Democratic party first vigorously asserted the
-economic basis of society and laid the emphasis upon its industrial
-aspect, the Government itself, in a series of legislative measures,
-designated “the Socialism of Bismarck,” found itself dealing directly
-with industry, through a sheer effort to give itself a touch of
-reality. The Government of Russia, in the first year of the Japanese
-War, made an effort to relieve the needs of the people. The bureaucracy
-itself organized the workmen into a species of trades unions through
-which the Russian Government promised to protect the proletarian from
-the aggressions of capital. The entire incident was suggestive of the
-protection<span class="pagenum" id="Page_123">[Pg 123]</span> afforded by the central State to the slowly emancipated
-serfs of central Europe when the barons, reluctant to give up their
-rights and privileges, so unjustly oppressed them.</p>
-
-<p>Shall a democracy be slower than these old Powers to protect its
-humblest citizen, and shall it see them slowly deteriorating because,
-according to democratic theory, they do not need protection?</p>
-
-
-<div class="footnotes"><h3>FOOTNOTES:</h3>
-
-<div class="footnote">
-
-<p><a id="Footnote_6" href="#FNanchor_6" class="label">[6]</a> Trade Unionism and Labor Problems, by John R. Commons,
-page 248.</p>
-
-</div>
-
-<div class="footnote">
-
-<p><a id="Footnote_7" href="#FNanchor_7" class="label">[7]</a> “The Slav Invasion,” by F. J. Warne, pages 118, 119.</p>
-
-</div>
-
-<div class="footnote">
-
-<p><a id="Footnote_8" href="#FNanchor_8" class="label">[8]</a> The Standard of Life, by Mrs. Bernard Bosanquet, page 4.</p>
-
-</div>
-
-<div class="footnote">
-
-<p><a id="Footnote_9" href="#FNanchor_9" class="label">[9]</a> The American City. Delos F. Wilcox, page 200.</p>
-
-</div>
-
-<div class="footnote">
-
-<p><a id="Footnote_10" href="#FNanchor_10" class="label">[10]</a> Compromise, John Morley, page 213.</p>
-
-</div>
-</div>
-
-<hr class="chap x-ebookmaker-drop">
-
-<div class="chapter">
-<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_124">[Pg 124]</span></p>
-<h2 class="nobreak" id="CHAPTER_V">CHAPTER V<br><span class="small">GROUP MORALITY IN THE LABOR MOVEMENT</span></h2></div>
-
-
-<p>This generation is constantly confronted by radical industrial changes,
-from which the community as a whole profits, but which must inevitably
-bring difficulty of adjustment and disaster to men of certain trades.
-In all fairness, these difficulties should be distributed and should
-not be allowed to fall completely upon the group of working-people
-whose labor is displaced as a result of the changes and who are obliged
-to learn anew their method of work and mode of life.</p>
-
-<p>If the great industrial changes could be considered as belonging
-to the community as a whole and could be reasonably dealt with,
-the situation would then be difficult enough, but it is enormously
-complicated by the fact that society has become divided into camps in
-relation to the industrial system and that many times the factions
-break out into active hostility. These two camps inevitably develop
-group morality—the employers tending toward the legal and contractual
-development of morality, the workingmen toward the<span class="pagenum" id="Page_125">[Pg 125]</span> sympathetic
-and human. Among our contemporaries, these two are typified by the
-employers associations and the trades unions.</p>
-
-<p>It is always difficult to judge a contemporaneous movement with any
-degree of fairness, and it is perennially perplexing to distinguish
-what is merely adventitious and temporary from that which represents
-essential and permanent tendencies. This discrimination is made much
-more difficult when a movement exhibits various stages of development
-contemporaneously, when a dozen historic phases are going on at the
-same time. Yet every historic movement towards democracy, which
-constantly gathers to itself large bodies of raw recruits while the
-older groups are moving on, presents this peculiar difficulty. In the
-case of trades unions, certain groups are marked by lawlessness and
-disorder, others by most decorous business methods, and still others
-are fairly decadent in their desire for monopolistic control. It is a
-long cry from the Chartists of 1839, burning hayricks, to John Burns of
-1902, pleading in the House of Commons with well-reasoned eloquence for
-an extension of the workingmen’s franchise. Nevertheless they are both
-manifestations of the same movement towards universal suffrage and show
-no greater difference than that between the Chicago<span class="pagenum" id="Page_126">[Pg 126]</span> teamsters, who
-were blocking commerce and almost barricading the streets in 1902 when
-at the same moment John Mitchell made his well-considered statement
-that he would rather lose the coal strike, with all that that loss
-implied, than gain it at the cost of violence. Students of industrial
-history will point out the sequence and development of the political
-movement from the Chartist to the Independent Labor party. They will
-tell us that the same desire burned in the hearts of the ignorant
-farmers which fired the distinguished parliamentarian, but they give
-no help to our bewildered minds when we would fain discover some order
-and sequence between the widely separated events of the contemporaneous
-labor movement.</p>
-
-<p>We must first get down to the question, In what does “the inevitably
-destined rise of the men of labor” consist? What are we trying to
-solve in this “most hazardous problem of the age”? Is progress in the
-labor movement to come, as we are told progress comes in the non-moral
-world, by the blind, brute struggle of individual interests; or is it
-to come, as its earlier leaders believed, through the operation of the
-human will? Is it a question of morals which must depend upon educators
-and apostles; or is it merely a conflict of opposing rights which may<span class="pagenum" id="Page_127">[Pg 127]</span>
-legitimately use coercion? The question, from the very nature of the
-case, is confusing; for, of necessity, the labor movement has perfectly
-legitimate economic and business aspects, which loom large and easily
-overshadow the ethical. We would all agree that only when men have
-education, a margin of leisure, and a decent home can they find room to
-develop the moral life. Before that, there are too many chances that
-it will be crushed out by ignorance, by grinding weariness, and by
-indecency. But the danger lies in the conviction that these advantages
-are to be secured by any means, moral or non-moral, and in holding them
-paramount to the inner life which they are supposed to nourish. The
-labor movement is confronted by that inevitable problem which confronts
-every movement and every individual. How far shall the compromise be
-made between the inner concept and the outer act? How may we concede
-what it is necessary to concede, without conceding all?</p>
-
-<p>We constantly forget that, in the last analysis, the spiritual growth
-of one social group is conditioned by the reaction of other social
-groups upon it. We ignore the fact that the worship of success, so long
-dominant in America, has taught the majority of our citizens to count
-only accomplishment and to make little inquiry concerning<span class="pagenum" id="Page_128">[Pg 128]</span> methods.
-Success has become the sole standard in regard to business enterprises
-and political parties, but it is evident that the public intends to
-call a halt before it is willing to apply the same standard to labor
-organizations.</p>
-
-<p>It is clear that the present moment is one of unusual crisis—that many
-of the trades unions of America have reached a transitional period,
-when they can no longer be mere propagandists, but are called upon to
-deal with concrete and difficult situations. When they were small and
-persecuted, they held to the faith and its implication of idealism. As
-they become larger and more powerful, they make terms with the life
-about them, and compromise as best they may with actual conditions.</p>
-
-<p>The older unions, which have reached the second stage that may be
-described as that of business dealing, are constantly hampered and
-harassed by the actions of the younger unions which are still in the
-enthusiastic stage. This embarrassment is especially notable just
-now, for, during this last period of prosperity, trades unions have
-increased enormously in numbers; the State Federation of Minnesota,
-for instance, reported an increase of six hundred per cent. in one
-year. Nearly all the well-established unions<span class="pagenum" id="Page_129">[Pg 129]</span> have been flooded by new
-members who are not yet assimilated and disciplined.</p>
-
-<p>During this period of extraordinary growth, the labor movement has
-naturally attracted to itself hundreds of organizations which are yet
-in their infancy and exhibit all the weakness of “group morality.” This
-doubtless tends to a conception of moral life which is as primitive as
-that which controlled the beginnings of patriotism, when the members
-of the newly conscious nation considered all those who were outside
-as possible oppressors and enemies, and were loyal only towards those
-whom their imagination included as belonging to the national life. They
-gave much, and demanded much, in the name of blood brothers, but were
-merciless to the rest of the world. In addition to its belligerent
-youth and its primitive morality, the newer union is prone to declare
-a strike, simply because the members have long suffered what they
-consider to be grievances, and the accumulated sense of unredressed
-wrong makes them eager for a chance to “fight for their rights.” At
-the same time, the employer always attempts his most vigorous attack
-upon a new union, both because he does not wish organized labor to
-obtain a foothold in his factory, and because his chances for success
-are greater before his employees are well disciplined<span class="pagenum" id="Page_130">[Pg 130]</span> in unionism.
-Nevertheless in actual conflict a young union will often make a more
-reckless fight than an older one, like the rough rider in contrast
-with the disciplined soldier. The members of a newly organized group
-naturally respond first to a sense of loyalty to each other as against
-their employers, and then to the wider consciousness of organized
-labor as against capital. This stage of trades unionism is full of
-war phraseology, with its “pickets” and “battle-grounds,” and is
-responsible for the most serious mistakes of the movement.</p>
-
-<p>The sense of group loyalty holds trades unionists longer than is normal
-to other groups, doubtless because of the constant accessions of those
-who are newly conscious of its claims.</p>
-
-<p>Those Chicago strikes, which, during the last few years, have
-been most notably characterized by disorder and the necessity for
-police interference, have almost universally been inaugurated by
-the newly organized unions. They have called to their aid the older
-organizations, and the latter have entered into the struggle many times
-under protest and most obviously against their best interests.</p>
-
-<p>The Chicago Federation of Labor has often given its official
-indorsement to hot-headed strikes on the part of “baby unions” because
-the<span class="pagenum" id="Page_131">[Pg 131]</span> delegates from the newly organized or freshly recruited unions had
-the larger vote, and the appeal to loyalty and to fraternity carried
-the meeting against the judgment of the delegates from the older unions.</p>
-
-<p>The members of newly organized unions more readily respond to the
-appeal to strike, in that it stirs memory of their “organization
-night,” when they were admitted after solemn ceremonies into the
-American Federation of Labor. At the same time, the organizers
-themselves often hold out too large promises, on the sordid side, of
-what organization will be able to accomplish. They tell the newly
-initiated what other unions have done, without telling at the same time
-how long they have been organized and how steadily they have paid dues.
-Several years ago, when there seemed to be a veritable “strike fever”
-in Chicago among the younger trades unions, it was suggested in the
-Federation of Labor that no union be authorized to declare a strike
-until it had been organized for at least two years. The regulation
-was backed by some of the strongest and wisest trades unionists,
-but it failed to pass because the organizers were convinced that it
-would cripple them in forming new unions. They would be obliged to
-point to many months of patient payment of dues and humdrum meetings
-before any<span class="pagenum" id="Page_132">[Pg 132]</span> real gain could be secured. The organizers, in fact, are
-in the position of a recruiting officer who is obliged to tell his
-raw material of all the glories of war, but at the same time bid them
-remember that warfare is always inexpedient. He must advise them to
-take a long and tedious training in the arts of diplomacy and in the
-most advanced methods of averting war before any action can possibly be
-considered.</p>
-
-<p>In point of fact the organizers do not do this, and many men join
-unions expecting that a strike will be speedily declared which will
-settle all the difficulties of modern industrialism. It is, therefore,
-not so remarkable that strikes should occur often and should exhibit
-warlike features. What is remarkable is the attitude of the public
-which has certainly eliminated the tactics of war in other civil
-relations.</p>
-
-<p>A tacit admission that a strike is war and that all the methods of
-warfare are permissible was made in Chicago during the teamsters’
-strike of 1905, when there was little protest against the war method
-of conducting a struggle between two private organizations, one of
-employer and one of employed. Why should the principles of legal
-adjustment have been thus complacently flung to the winds by the two
-millions of citizens who had no direct interest in this struggle, but<span class="pagenum" id="Page_133">[Pg 133]</span>
-whose pursuits in business were interfered with, whose safety on the
-streets was imperiled, and whose moral sensibilities were outraged?</p>
-
-<p>How did the public become hypnotized into a passive endurance of a
-street warfare in which two associations were engaged, like feudal
-chiefs with their recalcitrant retainers? In those similar cases, when
-blood grew too hot on both sides, the mediaeval emperor intervened and
-compelled peace. General public opinion is our hard-won substitute for
-the emperor’s personal will. Public opinion, however, did not assert
-itself and interfere—on the contrary, the entire town acquiesced in
-the statement of the contestants that this method of warfare was the
-only one possible, and thereupon yielded to a tendency to overvalue
-physical force and to ignore the subtler and less obvious conditions on
-which the public welfare rests. At that time all methods of arbitration
-and legal redress were completely set aside.</p>
-
-<p>There is no doubt but that ideas and words which at one time fill a
-community with enthusiasm may, after a few years, cease to be a moving
-force, apparently from no other reason than that they are spent and
-no longer fit into the temper of the hour. Such a fate has evidently
-befallen the word “arbitration,” at least in Chicago, as it is applied
-to industrial struggles.<span class="pagenum" id="Page_134">[Pg 134]</span> Almost immediately following the labor
-disturbances of 1894 in Chicago, the agitation was begun for a State
-Board of Arbitration, resulting in legislation and the appointment of
-the Illinois Board. At that time the public believed that arbitration
-would go far towards securing industrial peace, or at least that it
-would provide the device through which labor troubles could be speedily
-adjusted, and during that period there was much talk concerning
-compulsory arbitration with reference to the successful attempts in New
-Zealand.</p>
-
-<p>During the industrial struggles of later years, however, not only
-are the services of the State Board rejected, but voluntary bodies
-constantly find their efforts less satisfactory. Employers contend
-that arbitration implies the yielding of points on both sides.
-Since, however, most boards of arbitration provide that grievances
-must be submitted to them before the strike occurs, and the men are
-thus kept at work while the grievances are being considered, the men
-therefore have virtually nothing to lose by declaring a strike. They
-are subjected to a temptation to constantly formulate new demands,
-because, without losing time or pay, they are almost certain to secure
-some concession, however small, in their favor. The employers in the
-teamsters’ strike thus explained their position when they declared<span class="pagenum" id="Page_135">[Pg 135]</span>
-that there was nothing which could be submitted to arbitration. These
-employers also contended that the ordinary court has no precedent
-for dealing with questions of hours and wages, of shop rules, and
-many other causes of trade-union disputes, because all these matters
-are new as questions of law and can be satisfactorily adjusted only
-through industrial courts in which tradition and precedent bearing
-upon modern industrial conditions have been accumulated. The rise and
-fall of wages affect not one firm only, but a national industry, and
-even the currents of international trade, so that it is impossible to
-treat of them as matters in equity. With this explanation, the Chicago
-public rested content during the long weeks of the teamsters’ strike,
-for no one pointed out that these arguments did not apply to this
-particular situation, so accustomed have we grown in Chicago to warfare
-as a method of settling labor disputes. The charges of the Employers’
-Association against the teamsters did not involve any points demanding
-adjustment through industrial courts. The charges the Employers’
-Association made were those of broken contracts, of blackmail, and of
-conspiracy, all of them points which are constantly adjudicated in Cook
-County courts.</p>
-
-<p>It was constantly asserted that officers of the<span class="pagenum" id="Page_136">[Pg 136]</span> Teamsters’ Union
-demanded money from employers in the height of the busy season in order
-to avert threatened strikes; that there was a disgraceful alliance
-between certain members of the Team Owners’ Association and officers of
-the Teamsters’ Union.</p>
-
-<p>It would, of course, have been impossible to prove blackmail and
-the charges of “graft,” unless the employers themselves or their
-representatives had borne testimony, which would inevitably have
-implicated themselves. During the first weeks of the strike, these
-charges were freely made, definite sums were named, and dates were
-given. There was also an offer on the part of various managers to make
-affidavits, but later they shrank from the publicity, and refused to
-give them, preferring apparently to throw the whole town into disorder
-rather than to “stand up” to the consequences of their own acts and to
-acknowledge the bribery to which they claim they were forced to resort.
-They demonstrated once more that a show of manliness and an appeal to
-arms may many times hide cowardice.</p>
-
-<p>To throw affairs into a state of warfare is to put them where the moral
-aspect will not be scrutinized and where the mere interest of the game
-and a desire to watch it will be paramount.</p>
-
-<p>The vicious combination represented by certain<span class="pagenum" id="Page_137">[Pg 137]</span> men in the Team Owners’
-Association and in the Teamsters’ Union, “the labor and capital hunting
-together” kind, is a public menace which can be abolished only by a
-combined effort on the part of the best employers and the best labor
-men. The “better element” certainly were in a majority, for the most
-dangerous members of this sinister combination were at last reduced
-to fifteen or twenty men. These very men, however, after a prolonged
-strike, became either victors or martyrs, and in either case were
-firmly established in power and influence for the succeeding two
-years. Why should an entire city of two million people have been put
-to such an amazing amount of inconvenience and financial loss, with
-their characters brutalized as well, in order to accomplish this? The
-traditional burning of the house in order to roast the pig is quite
-outdone by this overturning of a city in order to catch a “score of
-rascals,” for in the end the rascals are not caught, and it is as if
-the house were burned and the pig had escaped. Was it not the result
-of acting under military fervor? Over and over again it has been found
-that organizations based upon a mutual sense of grievance or of outrage
-have always been militant, for while men cannot be formed permanently
-into associations whose chief bond is a sense of exasperation and
-wrong dealing,<span class="pagenum" id="Page_138">[Pg 138]</span> during the time they are thus held together they are
-committed to aggressive action.</p>
-
-<p>Moral rights and duties formed upon the relations of man to man are
-applicable to all situations, and to deny this applicability to a
-difficult case, is to beg the entire question. The consequences do not
-stop there, for we all know that to deny the validity of the moral
-principle in one relation is to sap its strength in all relations.</p>
-
-<p>Employers often resent being obliged to have business relations
-with workingmen, although they no longer say that they will refuse
-to deal with them, as a woman still permits herself to say that she
-“will not argue with a servant.” They nevertheless contend that the
-men are unreasonable, and that because it is impossible to establish
-contractual relations with them, they must be coerced. This contention
-goes far toward legitimatizing terrorism. It therefore seems to them
-defensible to refuse to go into the courts and to insist upon war
-because they do it from a consciousness of rectitude, although this
-insensibly slips into a consciousness of power, as self-righteousness
-is so prone to do. But these are all the traits of militant youth,
-which in the teamsters’ strike was indeed borne out by the facts in the
-case.</p>
-
-<p>The Employers’ Association of Chicago was largely composed of merchants
-whose experience<span class="pagenum" id="Page_139">[Pg 139]</span> with trades unionism was almost limited to the
-Teamsters’ Union which has been in existence for only five years and,
-from the first, has been truculent and difficult. Had the employers
-involved been manufacturers instead of merchants, they would have had
-years of experience with unions of skilled men, and they would have
-more nearly learned to adjust their personal and business relations
-to trades unionism. When an entire class in a community confess that
-without an appeal to arms they cannot deal with trades unions, who,
-after all, represent a national and international movement a hundred
-years old, they practically admit that they cannot manage their
-business under the existing conditions of modern life. To a very
-great extent it is a confession of weakness, to a very great extent a
-confession of frailty of temper. To make the adjustment to the peculiar
-problems of one’s own surroundings is the crux of life’s difficulties.
-“New organizations” and “new experiments in living” would not arise if
-there were not a certain inadequateness in existing organizations and
-ways of living. The new organizations and experiments may not point
-to the right mode of meeting the situation, but they do point to the
-existence of inadequateness and the need of readjustment. Changes in
-business methods have<span class="pagenum" id="Page_140">[Pg 140]</span> been multiform during the past fifteen years,
-and Chicago business men who have made those other adjustments would
-certainly be able to deal with labor in its present organized form if
-they were not inhibited by certain concepts of their “group morality.”</p>
-
-<p>In the meantime the public, which has been powerless to interfere, can
-only point to the consequences of grave social import which are sure to
-result from a prolonged period of disturbance.</p>
-
-<p>First, there is the sharp division of the community into classes, with
-its inevitable hostility and misunderstanding. Capital lines up on one
-side, and labor on the other, until the “fair-minded public” disappears
-and Chicago loses her democratic spirit which has always been her most
-precious possession. In its place is substituted loyalty to the side to
-which each man belongs, irrespective of the merits of the case—the “my
-country right or wrong” sentiment which we call patriotism only in war
-times, the blind adherence by which a man is attached against his will,
-as it were, to the blunders of “his own kind.”</p>
-
-<p>During the first week of the strike, I talked with labor men who were
-willing to admit that there were grounds for indictment against at
-least two of the officers in the teamsters’ locals.<span class="pagenum" id="Page_141">[Pg 141]</span> During the third
-week of the strike all that was swept aside, and one heard only that
-the situation must be taken quite by itself, with no references to
-the first causes, that it was a strike of organized capital against
-organized labor, and that we could have no peace in Chicago until it
-was “fought to a finish.”</p>
-
-<p>Second, there is an enormous increase in the feeling of race animosity,
-beginning with the imported negro strike-breakers, and easily extending
-to “Dagoes” and all other distinct nationalities. The principle of
-racial and class equality is at the basis of American political life,
-and to wantonly destroy it is one of the gravest outrages against the
-Republic.</p>
-
-<p>Chicago is preëminently a city of mixed nationalities. It is our
-problem to learn to live together in forbearance and understanding
-and to fuse all the nations of men into the newest and, perhaps,
-the highest type of citizenship. To accept this responsibility may
-constitute our finest contribution to the problems of American life,
-but we may also wantonly and easily throw away such an opportunity
-by the stirring up of race and national animosity which is so easily
-aroused and so reluctantly subsides.</p>
-
-<p>Third, there is the spirit of materialism which controls the city and
-confirms the belief that, after<span class="pagenum" id="Page_142">[Pg 142]</span> all, brute force, a trial of physical
-strength, is all that counts and the only thing worthy of admiration.
-Any check on the moral consciousness is paralyzed when the belief
-is once established that success is its own justification. When the
-stream of this belief joins the current of class interest, the spirit
-of the prize fighters’ ring which cheers the best round and worships
-the winner, becomes paramount. It is exactly that which appeals to
-the so-called “hoodlum,” and his sudden appearance upon the street
-at such times and in such surprising numbers demonstrates that he
-realizes that he has come to his own. At the moment we all forget that
-the determination to sacrifice all higher considerations to business
-efficiency, to make the machine move smoothly at any cost, “to stick
-at nothing,” may easily make a breach in the ethical constitution of
-society which can be made good only by years of painful reparation.</p>
-
-<p>Fourth, there is the effect upon the children and the youth of the
-entire city, for the furrow of class prejudice, which is so easily run
-through a plastic mind, often leaves a life-long mark. Each morning
-during the long weeks of the strike, thousands of children at the more
-comfortable breakfast tables learned to regard labor unions as the
-inciters of riot and the instruments of evil, thousands of children
-at the less comfortable<span class="pagenum" id="Page_143">[Pg 143]</span> breakfast tables shared the impotent rage
-of their parents that “law is always on the side of capital,” and
-both sets of children added to the horrors of Manchuria and Warsaw,
-which were then taking place, the pleasurable excitement that war
-had become domesticated upon their own streets. We may well believe
-that these impressions and emotions will be kept by these children
-as part of their equipment in life and that their moral conceptions
-will permanently tend toward group moralities and will be cast into a
-coarser mold.</p>
-
-<p>In illustration of this point I may, perhaps, cite my experience during
-the Spanish War.</p>
-
-<p>For ten years I had lived in a neighborhood which is by no means
-criminal, and yet during October and November of 1898 we were startled
-by seven murders within a radius of ten blocks. A little investigation
-of details and motives, the accident of a personal acquaintance with
-two of the criminals, made it not in the least difficult to trace
-the murders back to the influence of the war. Simple people who
-read of carnage and bloodshed easily receive suggestions. Habits of
-self-control which have been but slowly and imperfectly acquired
-quickly break down when such a stress is put upon them.</p>
-
-<p>Psychologists intimate that action is determined by the selection
-of the subject upon which<span class="pagenum" id="Page_144">[Pg 144]</span> the attention is habitually fixed. The
-newspapers, the theatrical posters, the street conversations for weeks,
-had to do with war and bloodshed. Day after day, the little children on
-the street played at war and at killing Spaniards. The humane instinct,
-which keeps in abeyance the tendency to cruelty, as well as the growing
-belief that the life of each human being, however hopeless or degraded,
-is still sacred, gives way, and the more primitive instinct asserts
-itself.</p>
-
-<p>There is much the same social result during a strike, in addition
-to the fact that the effect of the prolonged warfare upon the labor
-movement itself is most disastrous. The unions at such times easily
-raise into power the unscrupulous “leader,” so-called. In times of
-tumult, the aggressive man, the one who is of bellicose temper, and
-is reckless in his statements, is the one who becomes a leader. It is
-a vicious circle—the more warlike the times, the more reckless the
-leader who is demanded, and his reckless course prolongs the struggle.
-Such men make their appeal to loyalty for the union, to hatred and to
-contempt for the “non-union” man. Mutual hate towards a non-unionist
-may have in it the mere beginnings of fellowship, the protoplasm of
-tribal fealty, but no more. When it is carried over into civilized<span class="pagenum" id="Page_145">[Pg 145]</span>
-life it becomes a social deterrent and an actual menace to social
-relations.</p>
-
-<p>In a sense it is fair to hold every institution responsible for the
-type of man whom it tends to bring to the front, and the type of
-organization which clings to war methods must, of course, consider
-it nobler to yield to force than to justice. The earlier struggle of
-democracy was for its recognition as a possible form of government
-and the struggle is now on to prove democracy an efficient form of
-government. So the earlier struggles of trades unions were for mere
-existence, and the struggle has now passed into one for a recognition
-of contractual relations and collective bargaining which will make
-trades unions an effective industrial instrument. It is much less
-justifiable of course in the later effort than it was in the earlier to
-carry on the methods of primitive warfare.</p>
-
-<p>This new effort, however, from the very nature of things, is bringing
-another type of union man into office and is modifying the entire
-situation. The old-time agitator is no longer useful and a cooler man
-is needed for collective bargaining. At the same time the employers
-must put forth a more democratic and a more reasonable type of man if
-they would bear their side of this new bargaining, so that it has come
-about quite<span class="pagenum" id="Page_146">[Pg 146]</span> recently that the first attempts have been made in Chicago
-towards controlling in the interests of business itself this natural
-tendency of group morality.</p>
-
-<p>It may offer another example of business and commerce, affording us
-a larger morality than that which the moralists themselves teach.
-Certain it is that the industrial problems engendered by the industrial
-revolutions of the last century, and flung upon this century for
-solution, can never be solved by class warfare nor yet by ignoring
-their existence in the optimism of ignorance.</p>
-
-<p>America is only beginning to realize, and has not yet formulated, all
-the implications of the factory system and of the conditions of living
-which this well-established system imposes upon the workers. As we
-feel it closing down upon us, moments of restlessness and resentment
-seize us all. The protest against John Mitchell’s statement<a id="FNanchor_11" href="#Footnote_11" class="fnanchor">[11]</a> that
-the American workingman has recognized that he is destined to remain
-a workingman, is a case in point. In their attempt to formulate and
-correct various industrial ills, trades unions are often blamed for
-what is inherent in the factory system itself and for those evils which
-can be cured only through a modification of that system. For instance,
-factory workers in general<span class="pagenum" id="Page_147">[Pg 147]</span> have for years exhibited a tendency to
-regulate the output of each worker to a certain amount which they
-consider a fair day’s work, although to many a worker such a restricted
-output may prove to be less than a fair day’s work. The result is, of
-course, disastrous to the workers themselves as well as to the factory
-management, for it doubtless is quite as injurious to a man’s nervous
-system to retard his natural pace as it is to unduly accelerate it.
-The real trouble, which this “limitation” is an awkward attempt to
-correct, is involved in the fact that the intricate subdivision of
-factory work, and the lack of understanding on the part of employees
-of the finished product, has made an unnatural situation, in which the
-worker has no normal interest in his work and no direct relation to it.
-In the various makeshifts on the part of the manufacturer to supply
-motives which shall take the place of the natural ones so obviously
-missing, many devices have been resorted to, such as “speeding up”
-machinery, “setting the pace,” and substituting “piece work” for day
-work. The manufacturers may justly say that they have been driven to
-these various expedients, not only by the factory conditions, but by
-the natural laziness of men. Nevertheless reaction from such a course
-is inevitably an uncompromising attempt on the part of the workers<span class="pagenum" id="Page_148">[Pg 148]</span>
-to protect themselves from overexertion and to regulate the output.
-The worst cases I have ever known have occurred in unorganized shops
-and have been unregulated and unaided by any trades union. The “pace
-setter” in such a shop is often driven out and treated with the same
-animosity which the “scab” receives in a union shop.</p>
-
-<p>In the same spirit we blame trades unionists for that disgraceful
-attitude which they have from time to time taken against the
-introduction of improved machinery—a small group blindly attempting
-to defend what they consider their only chance to work. The economists
-have done surprisingly little to shed light upon this difficulty;
-indeed, they are somewhat responsible for its exaggeration. Their old
-theory of a “wage fund” which did not reach the rank and file of trades
-unionists until at least in its first form it had been abandoned by the
-leading economists, has been responsible both for much disorder along
-this line, and for the other mistaken attempt “to make work for more
-men.”</p>
-
-<p>A society which made some effort to secure an equitable distribution of
-the leisure and increased ease which new inventions imply would remove
-the temptations as well as the odium of such action from the men who
-are blinded by<span class="pagenum" id="Page_149">[Pg 149]</span> what they consider an infringement of their rights.</p>
-
-<p>If the wonderful inventions of machinery, as they came along during
-the last century, could have been regarded as in some sense social
-possessions, the worst evils attending the factory system of
-production—starvation wages, exhausting hours, unnecessary monotony,
-child labor, and all the rest of the wretched list—might have been
-avoided in the interest of society itself. All this would have come
-about had human welfare been earlier regarded as a legitimate object of
-social interest.</p>
-
-<p>But no such ethics had been developed in the beginning of this century.
-Society regarded machinery as the absolute possession of the man who
-owned it at the moment it became a finished product, quite irrespective
-of the long line of inventors and workmen who represented its gradual
-growth and development. Society was, therefore, destined to all the
-maladjustment which this century has encountered. Is it the militant
-spirit once more as over against the newer humanitarianism? The
-possessor of the machine, like the possessor of arms who preceded him,
-regards it as a legitimate weapon for exploitation, as the former held
-his sword.</p>
-
-<p>One of the exhibits in the Paris Exposition of<span class="pagenum" id="Page_150">[Pg 150]</span> 1900 presented a
-contrast between a mediaeval drawing of a castle towering above the
-hamlets of its protected serfs, and a modern photograph of the same
-hill covered with a huge factory which overlooked the villages of
-its dependent workmen. The two pictures of the same hill and of the
-same plain bore more than a geographic resemblance. This suggestion
-of modern exploitation would be impossible had we learned the first
-lessons which an enlarged industrialism might teach us. Class and
-group divisions with their divergent moralities become most dangerous
-when their members believe that the inferior group or class cannot
-be appealed to by reason and fair dealing, but must be treated upon
-a lower plane. Terrorism is considered necessary and legitimate that
-they may be inhibited by fear from committing certain acts. So far
-as employers exhibit this spirit toward workmen, or trades unionists
-toward non-unionists, they inevitably revert to the use of brute
-force—to the methods of warfare.</p>
-
-
-<div class="footnotes"><h3>FOOTNOTES:</h3>
-
-<div class="footnote">
-
-<p><a id="Footnote_11" href="#FNanchor_11" class="label">[11]</a> Organized Labor, John Mitchell. Preface.</p>
-
-</div>
-</div>
-
-<hr class="chap x-ebookmaker-drop">
-
-<div class="chapter">
-<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_151">[Pg 151]</span></p>
-<h2 class="nobreak" id="CHAPTER_VI">CHAPTER VI<br><span class="small">PROTECTION OF CHILDREN FOR INDUSTRIAL EFFICIENCY</span></h2></div>
-
-
-<p>In the previous chapters it was stated that the United States, compared
-to the most advanced European nations, is deficient in protective
-legislation. This, as has been said, is the result of the emphasis
-placed upon personal liberty at the date of the first constitutional
-conventions and of the inherited belief in America that government is
-of necessity oppressive, and its functions not to be lightly extended.</p>
-
-<p>It is also possible that this protection of the humblest citizen has
-been pushed forward in those countries of a homogeneous population
-more rapidly than in America, because of that unconscious attitude of
-contempt which the nationality at the moment representing economic
-success always takes toward the weaker and less capable. There is no
-doubt that we all despise our immigrants a little because of their
-economic standing. The newly arrived immigrant goes very largely into
-unskilled work; he builds the railroads, digs the sewers, he does
-the sort of labor the English-speaking<span class="pagenum" id="Page_152">[Pg 152]</span> American soon gets rid of;
-and then, because he is in this lowest economic class, he falls into
-need, and we complain that in America the immigrant makes the largest
-claim upon charitable funds. Yet in England, where immigration has
-counted for very little; in Germany, where it has counted almost not
-at all, we find the same claim made upon the public funds by people
-who do the same unskilled work, who are paid the same irregular and
-low wages. In Germany, where this matter is approached, not from the
-charitable, but from the patriotic side, there is a tremendous code
-of legislation for the protection of the men who hold to life by the
-most uncertain economic tenure. In England there exists an elaborated
-code of labor laws, protecting the laborer at all times from accidents,
-in ways unknown in America. Here we have only the beginning of all
-that legislation, partly because we have not yet broken through the
-belief that the man who does this casual work is not yet quite one
-of ourselves. We do not consider him entitled to the protective
-legislation which is secured for him in other countries where he is
-quite simply a fellow-citizen, humble it may be, but still bound to the
-governing class by ties of blood and homogeneity.</p>
-
-<p>Our moral attitude toward one group in the<span class="pagenum" id="Page_153">[Pg 153]</span> community is a determining
-factor of our moral attitude toward other groups, and this relation of
-kindly contempt, of charitable rather than democratic obligation, may
-lend some explanation to the fact that the United States, as a nation,
-is sadly in arrears in the legislation designed for the protection of
-children. In the Southern States, where a contemptuous attitude towards
-a weaker people has had the most marked effect upon public feeling,
-we have not only the largest number of unprotected working children,
-but the largest number of illiterate children as well. There are, in
-the United States, according to the latest census<a id="FNanchor_12" href="#Footnote_12" class="fnanchor">[12]</a> 580,000 children
-between the ages of ten and fourteen years, who cannot read nor write.
-They are not the immigrant children. They are our own native-born
-children. Of these 570,000 are in the Southern States and ten thousand
-of them are scattered over the rest of the Republic.</p>
-
-<p>The same thing is true of our children at work. We have two millions
-of them, according to the census of 1900—children under the age of
-sixteen years who are earning their own livings.</p>
-
-<p>Legislation of the States south of Maryland for the children is like
-the legislation of England in 1844. We are sixty-two years behind
-England<span class="pagenum" id="Page_154">[Pg 154]</span> in caring for the children of the textile industries.</p>
-
-<p>May we not also trace some of this national indifference to the
-disposition of the past century to love children without really knowing
-them? We refuse to recognize them as the great national asset and
-are content to surround them with a glamour of innocence and charm.
-We put them prematurely to work, ignorant of the havoc it brings,
-because no really careful study has been made of their capacities
-and possibilities—that is, no study really fitted to the industrial
-conditions in which they live.</p>
-
-<p>Each age has, of course, its own temptations and above all its own
-peculiar industrial temptations and needs to see them not only in the
-light of the increased sensibility and higher ethical standards of
-its contemporaries, but also in relation to its peculiar industrial
-development. When we ask why it is that child-labor has been given
-to us to discuss and to rectify, rather than to the people who
-lived before us, we need only to remember that, for the first
-time in industrial history, the labor of the little child has in
-many industries become as valuable as that of a man or woman. The
-old-fashioned weaver was obliged to possess skill and strength to pull
-his beam back and forth. It is only through the elaborated inventions
-of our own age that skill as well as<span class="pagenum" id="Page_155">[Pg 155]</span> strength has been so largely
-eliminated that, for example, a little child may “tend the thread” in
-a textile mill almost as well as an adult. This is true of so many
-industries that the temptation to exploit premature labor has become
-peculiar to this industrial epoch and we are tempted as never before to
-use the labor of little children.</p>
-
-<p>What, then, are we going to do about it? How deeply are we concerned
-that this labor shall not result to the detriment of the child, and
-what excuses are we making to ourselves for thus prematurely using up
-the strength which really belongs to the next generation? Of course,
-it is always difficult to see the wrong in a familiar thing; it is
-almost a test of moral insight to be able to see that an affair of
-familiar intercourse and daily living may also be wrong. I have taken a
-Chicago street-car on a night in December at ten o’clock, when dozens
-of little girls who had worked in the department stores all day were
-also boarding the cars. I know, as many others do, that these children
-will not get into their beds before midnight, and that they will have
-to be up again early in the morning to go to their daily work. And yet
-because I have seen it many times I take my car almost placidly—I am
-happy to say, not quite placidly. Almost every day at six o’clock I see
-certain factories pouring out<span class="pagenum" id="Page_156">[Pg 156]</span> a stream of men and women and boys and
-girls. The boys and girls have a peculiar hue—a color so distinctive
-that one meeting them on the street, even on Sunday when they are in
-their best clothes and mingled with other children who go to school and
-play out of doors, can distinguish them in an instant, and there is on
-their faces a premature anxiety and sense of responsibility, which we
-should declare pathetic if we were not used to it.</p>
-
-<p>How far are we responsible when we allow custom to blind our eyes
-to the things that are wrong? In spite of the enormous growth in
-charitable and correctional agencies designed for children, are we
-really so lacking in moral insight and vigor that we fail even to
-perceive the real temptation of our age and totally fail to grapple
-with it? An enlightened State which regarded the industrial situation
-seriously would wish to conserve the ability of its youth, to give them
-valuable training in relation to industry, quite as the old-fashioned
-State carefully calculated the years which were the most valuable for
-military training. The latter, looking only toward the preservation of
-the State, took infinite pains, while we are careless in regard to the
-much greater task which has to do with its upbuilding and extension. We
-conscientiously ignore industry in relation to government and because
-we assume that its regulation<span class="pagenum" id="Page_157">[Pg 157]</span> is unnecessary, so we conclude that the
-protection of the young from premature participation in its mighty
-operations is not the concern of the Government.</p>
-
-<p>The municipal lodging-house in Chicago in addition to housing vagrants,
-makes an intelligent effort to put them into regular industry. A
-physician in attendance makes a careful examination of each man who
-comes to the lodging-house, and one winter we tried to see what
-connection could be genuinely established between premature labor and
-worn-out men. It is surprising to find how many of them are tired to
-death of monotonous labor, and begin to tramp in order to get away
-from it—as a business man goes to the woods because he is worn out
-with the stress of business life. This inordinate desire to get away
-from work seems to be connected with the fact that the men started to
-work very early, before they had the physique to stand up to it, or
-the mental vigor with which to overcome its difficulties, or the moral
-stamina which makes a man stick to his work whether he likes it or
-not. But we cannot demand any of these things from the growing boy.
-They are all traits of the adult. A boy is naturally restless, his
-determination easily breaks down, and he runs away. At least this seems
-to be true of many of the men who come to the<span class="pagenum" id="Page_158">[Pg 158]</span> lodging-house. I recall
-a man who had begun to work in a textile mill quite below the present
-legal age in New England, and who had worked hard for sixteen years.
-He told his tale with all simplicity; and, as he made a motion with
-his hand, he said, “I done that for sixteen years.” I give the words
-as he gave them. “At last I was sick in bed for two or three weeks
-with a fever, and when I crawled out, I made up my mind that I would
-rather go to hell than to go back to that mill.” Whether he considered
-Chicago as equivalent to that, I do not know; but he certainly tramped
-to Chicago, and has been tramping for four years. He does not steal.
-He works in a lumber camp occasionally, and wanders about the rest of
-the time getting odd jobs when he can; but the suggestion of a factory
-throws him into a panic, and causes him quickly to disappear from the
-lodging-house. The physician has made a diagnosis of general debility.
-The man is not fit for steady work. He has been whipped in the battle
-of life, and is spent prematurely because he began prematurely.</p>
-
-<p>Yet the state makes no careful study as to the effect upon children
-of the subdivided labor which many of them perform in factories.
-A child who remains year after year in a spinning room gets no
-instruction—merely a dull distaste for work.<span class="pagenum" id="Page_159">[Pg 159]</span> Often he cannot stand up
-to the grind of factory life, and he breaks down under it.</p>
-
-<p>What does this mean? That we have no right to increase the list
-of paupers—of those who must be cared for by municipal and State
-agencies because when they were still immature and undeveloped, they
-were subjected to a tremendous pressure. I recall one family of five
-children which, upon the death of the energetic mother who had provided
-for it by means of a little dress-making establishment, was left to the
-care of a feeble old grandmother. The father was a drunkard who had
-never supported his family, and at this time he definitely disappeared.
-The oldest boy was almost twelve years old—a fine, manly little
-fellow, who felt keenly his obligation to care for the family.</p>
-
-<p>We found him a place as cash-boy in a department store for two dollars
-a week. He held it for three years, although his enthusiasm failed
-somewhat as the months went by, and he gradually discovered how little
-help his wages were to the family exchequer after his carfare, decent
-clothes and unending pairs of shoes were paid for. Before the end of
-the third year he had become listless and indifferent to his work, in
-spite of the increase of fifty cents a week. In the hope that a change
-would be good for him, a place as elevator-boy<span class="pagenum" id="Page_160">[Pg 160]</span> was secured. This
-he was unable to keep, and then one situation after another slipped
-through his grasp, until a typhoid fever which he developed at the age
-of fifteen, seemed to explain his apathy.</p>
-
-<p>After a long illness and a poor recovery, he worked less well.
-Finally, at the age of sixteen, when he should have been able really
-to help the little family and perhaps be its main support, he had
-become a professional tramp, and eventually dropped completely from
-our knowledge. It was through such bitter lessons as these we learned
-that good intentions and the charitable impulse do not always work
-for righteousness; that to force the moral nature of a child and to
-put tasks upon him beyond his normal growth, is quite as cruel and
-disastrous as to expect his undeveloped muscle to lift huge weights.</p>
-
-<p>Adolescence is filled with strange pauses of listlessness and
-dreaminess. At that period the human will is perhaps further away from
-the desire of definite achievement than it ever is again. To work ten
-hours a day for six days in a week in order to buy himself a pair of
-stout boots, that he may be properly shod to go to work some more,
-is the very last thing which really appeals to a boy of thirteen or
-fourteen. If he is forced to such a course too often, his cheated
-nature later re-asserts<span class="pagenum" id="Page_161">[Pg 161]</span> itself in all sorts of decadent and abnormal
-ways.</p>
-
-<p>An enlightened state would also concern itself with the effect of
-child labor upon the parents. We have in Chicago a great many European
-immigrants, people who have come from country life in Bohemia or the
-south of Italy, hoping that their children will have a better chance
-here than at home. In the old country these immigrants worked on farms
-which provided a very normal activity for a young boy or girl. When
-they come to Chicago, they see no reason why their children should not
-go to work, because they see no difference between the normal activity
-of their own youth and the grinding life, to which they subject their
-children. It is difficult for a man who has grown up in outdoor life
-to adapt himself to the factory. The same experience is found in the
-South with the men who come to the textile towns from the little farms.
-They resent monotonous petty work, and get away from it; they will
-in preference take more poorly paid work, care of horses or janitor
-service—work which has some similarity to that to which they have
-been accustomed. So the parents drop out, and the children, making the
-adaptation, remain, and the curious result ensues of the head of the
-household becoming dependent<span class="pagenum" id="Page_162">[Pg 162]</span> upon the earnings of the child. You will
-hear a child say, “My mother can’t say nothing to me. I pay the rent;”
-or, “I can do what I please, because I bring home the biggest wages.”
-All this tends to break down the normal relation between parents and
-children. The Italian men who work on the railroads in the summer find
-it a great temptation to settle down in the winter upon the wages
-of their children. A young man from the south of Italy was mourning
-the death of his little girl of twelve; in his grief he said, quite
-simply, “She was my oldest kid. In two years she could have supported
-me, and now I shall have to work five or six years longer until the
-next one can do it.” He expected to retire permanently at thirty-four.
-That breaking down of the normal relation of parent and child, and the
-tendency to demoralize the parent, is something we have no right to
-subject him to. We ought to hold the parent up to the obligation which
-he would have fulfilled had he remained in his early environment.</p>
-
-<p>A modern state might rightly concern itself with the effect of child
-labor upon industry itself. There has been for many years an increasing
-criticism of the modern factory system, not only from the point of view
-of the worker, but from the point of view of the product itself. It
-has<span class="pagenum" id="Page_163">[Pg 163]</span> been said many times that we can not secure good workmanship nor
-turn out a satisfactory product unless men and women have some sort
-of interest in their work, and some way of expressing that interest
-in relation to it. The system which makes no demand upon originality,
-upon invention, upon self-direction, works automatically, as it were,
-towards an unintelligent producer and towards an uninteresting product.
-This was said at first only by such artists and social reformers as
-Morris and Ruskin; but it is being gradually admitted by men of affairs
-and may at last incorporate itself into actual factory management, in
-which case the factory itself will favor child labor legislation or
-any other measure which increases the free and full development of the
-individual, because he thereby becomes a more valuable producer. We may
-gradually discover that in the interests of this industrial society
-of ours it becomes a distinct loss to put large numbers of producers
-prematurely at work, not only because the community inevitably loses
-their mature working power, but also because their “free labor
-quality,” which is so valuable, is permanently destroyed.</p>
-
-<p>Exercise of the instinct of workmanship not only affords great
-satisfaction to the producer, but also to the consumer, if he be
-possessed of any<span class="pagenum" id="Page_164">[Pg 164]</span> critical faculty, or have developed genuine powers of
-appreciation. Added to the conscience which protests against the social
-waste of child labor, we have the taste that revolts against a product
-totally without the charm which pleasure in work creates. We may at
-last discover that we are imperiling our civilization at the moment of
-its marked materialism, by wantonly sacrificing to that materialism the
-eternal spirit of youth, the power of variation, which alone is able to
-prevent it from degenerating into a mere mechanism.</p>
-
-<p>It would be easy to produce many illustrations to demonstrate that in
-the leading industrial countries a belief is slowly developing that the
-workman himself is the chief asset, and that the intelligent interest
-of skilled men, the power of self-direction and co-operation which is
-only possible among the free-born and educated, is exactly the only
-thing which will hold out in the markets of the world. As the foremen
-of factories testify again and again, factory discipline is valuable
-only up to a certain point, after which something else must be depended
-on if the best results are to be achieved.</p>
-
-<p>Monopoly of both the raw material and the newly-opened markets is
-certainly a valuable factor in a nation’s industrial prosperity; but
-while we spend blood and treasure to protect one and<span class="pagenum" id="Page_165">[Pg 165]</span> secure the other,
-we wantonly destroy the most valuable factor of all, intelligent labor.
-Nothing can help us here save the rising tide of humanitarianism, which
-is not only emotional enough to regret the pitiless and stupid waste
-of this power but also intelligent enough to perceive what might be
-accomplished by its utilization.</p>
-
-<p>We are told that the German products hold a foremost place in the
-markets of the world because of Germany’s fine educational system,
-which includes training in trade-schools for so many young men. We
-know, too, that there is at the present moment a strong party in
-Germany opposing militarism, not from the “peace society” point of
-view, but because it withdraws all the young men from the industrial
-life for the best part of three years during which their activity is
-merely disciplinary, with no relation to the industrial life of the
-nation. This anti-military party insists that the loss of the three
-years is a serious matter, and that one nation cannot successfully hold
-its advance position if it must compete with other nations which are
-also establishing trade-schools but which do not thus withdraw their
-youth from continuous training at the period of their greatest docility
-and aptitude.</p>
-
-<p>England is discovering that the cheap markets afforded by semi-savage
-peoples, which she has<span class="pagenum" id="Page_166">[Pg 166]</span> thrown open to her manufacturers, are now
-reacting in the debasement of her products and her factory workers.
-The manufacturer produces the cheap and inferior articles which he
-imagines the new commerce will demand. The result upon the workers in
-the factories producing these unworthy goods, is that they are robbed
-of the skill which would be demanded if they were ministering to an
-increasing demand of taste and if they were supplying the market of a
-civilized people. It would be a curious result of misapplied energy
-if those very markets which the Briton has so eagerly sought, would
-finally so debase the English producers that all the increased wealth
-the markets have brought to the nation would be consumed in efforts to
-redeem the debased working population.</p>
-
-<p>We have made public education our great concern in America, and perhaps
-the public-school system is our most distinctive achievement; but
-there is a certain lack of consistency in the relation of the State
-to the child after he leaves the public school. At great expense the
-State has provided school buildings and equipment, and other buildings
-in which to prepare professional teachers. It has spared no pains to
-make the system complete, and yet as rapidly as the children leave the
-schoolroom, the State seems to lose<span class="pagenum" id="Page_167">[Pg 167]</span> all interest and responsibility in
-their welfare and has, until quite recently, turned them over to the
-employer with no restrictions.</p>
-
-<p>At no point does the community say to the employer, We are allowing
-you to profit by the labor of these children whom we have educated at
-great cost, and we demand that they do not work so many hours that they
-shall be exhausted. Nor shall they be allowed to undertake the sort of
-labor which is beyond their strength, nor shall they spend their time
-at work that is absolutely devoid of educational value. The preliminary
-education which they have received in school is but one step in the
-process of making them valuable and normal citizens, and we cannot
-afford to have that intention thwarted, even though the community as
-well as yourself may profit by the business activity which your factory
-affords.</p>
-
-<p>Such a position seems perfectly reasonable, yet the same citizens who
-willingly pay taxes to support an elaborate public-school system,
-strenuously oppose the most moderate attempts to guard the children
-from needless and useless exploitation after they have left school and
-have entered industry.</p>
-
-<p>We are forced to believe that child labor is a national problem, even
-as public education is a national duty. The children of Alabama, Rhode<span class="pagenum" id="Page_168">[Pg 168]</span>
-Island, and Pennsylvania belong to the nation quite as much as they
-belong to each State, and the nation has an interest in the children
-at least in relation to their industrial efficiency, quite as it has
-an interest in enacting protective tariffs for the preservation of
-American industries.</p>
-
-<p>Uniform compulsory education laws in connection with uniform child
-labor legislation are the important factors in securing educated
-producers for the nation. Fortunately, a new education is arising which
-endeavors to widen and organize the child’s experience with reference
-to the world in which he lives.<a id="FNanchor_13" href="#Footnote_13" class="fnanchor">[13]</a> The new pedagogy holds that it is
-a child’s instinct and pleasure to exercise all his faculties and to
-make discoveries in the world around him. It is the chief business of
-the teacher merely to direct his activity and to feed his insatiable
-curiosity. In order to accomplish this, he is forced to relate the
-child to the surroundings in which he lives; and the most advanced
-schools are, perforce, using modern industry for this purpose. The
-educators have ceased to mourn industrial conditions of the past
-generation, when children were taught agricultural and industrial
-arts by the natural co-operation with their parents, and they are
-endeavoring to supply this inadequacy by manual arts in the school,
-by courses in industrial history,<span class="pagenum" id="Page_169">[Pg 169]</span> and by miniature reproductions of
-industrial processes, thus constantly coming into better relations with
-the present factory system. These educators recognize the significance
-and power of contemporary industrialism, and hold it an obligation to
-protect children from premature participation in our industrial life,
-only that the children may secure the training and fibre which will
-later make this participation effective, and that their minds may
-finally take possession of the machines which they will guide and feed.</p>
-
-<p>But there is another side to the benefits of child-labor legislation
-represented by the time element, the leisure which is secured to
-the child for the pursuit of his own affairs, quite aside from the
-opportunity afforded him to attend school. Helplessness in childhood,
-the scientists tell us, is the guarantee of adult intellect, but they
-also assert that play in youth is the guarantee of adult culture. It
-is the most valuable instrument the race possesses to keep life from
-becoming mechanical.</p>
-
-<p>The child who cannot live life is prone to dramatize it, and the very
-process is a constant compromise between imitation and imagination, as
-the over-mastering impulse itself which drives him to incessant play is
-both reminiscent and anticipatory. In proportion as the child in later
-life is to be subjected to a mechanical and one-sided<span class="pagenum" id="Page_170">[Pg 170]</span> activity, and as
-a highly subdivided labor is to be demanded from him, it is therefore
-most important that he should have his full period of childhood and
-youth for this play expression in order that he may cultivate within
-himself the root of a culture which alone can give his later activity a
-meaning.<a id="FNanchor_14" href="#Footnote_14" class="fnanchor">[14]</a> This is true whether or not we accept the theory that the
-aesthetic feelings originate in the play impulse, with its corollary
-that the constant experimentation found in the commonest forms of
-play are to be looked upon as “the principal source of all kinds of
-art.” At this moment, when industrial forces are concentrated and
-unified as never before, unusual care must be taken to secure to the
-children their normal play period, that the art instinct may have some
-chance, and that the producer himself may have enough individuality of
-character to avoid becoming a mere cog in the vast industrial machine.</p>
-
-<p>Quite aside also from the problem of individual development and
-from the fact that play, in which the power of choice is constantly
-presented and constructive imagination required, is the best corrective
-of the future disciplinary life of the factory, there is another reason
-why the children who are to become producers under the present system
-should be given their full child-life period.</p>
-<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_171">[Pg 171]</span></p>
-<p>The entire population of the factory town and of those enormous
-districts in every large city in which the children live who most need
-the protection of child-labor legislation, consists of people who have
-come together in response to the demands of modern industry. They are
-held together by the purely impersonal tie of working in one large
-factory, in which they not only do not know each other, but in which
-no one person nor even group of persons knows everybody. They are
-utterly without the natural and minute acquaintance and inter-family
-relationships that rural and village life afford, and are therefore
-much more dependent upon the social sympathy and power of effective
-association which is becoming its urban substitute.</p>
-
-<p>This substitute can be most easily elaborated among groups of
-children. Somewhere they must learn to carry on an orderly daily
-life—that life of mutual trust, forbearance, and help which is the
-only real life of civilized man. Play is the great social stimulus,
-and it is the prime motive which unites children and draws them into
-comradeship. A true democratic relation and ease of acquaintance is
-found among the children in a typical factory community because they
-more readily overcome differences of language, tradition, and religion
-than do the adults. “It is in<span class="pagenum" id="Page_172">[Pg 172]</span> play that nature reveals her anxious
-care to discover men to each other,” and this happy and important
-task, children unconsciously carry forward day by day with all the
-excitement and joy of co-ordinate activity. They accomplish that which
-their elders could not possibly do, and they render a most important
-service to the community. We have not as yet utilized this joy of
-association in relation to the system of factory production which is
-so preëminently one of large bodies of men working together for hours
-at a time. But there is no doubt that it would bring a new power into
-modern industry if the factory could avail itself of that <i>esprit
-de corps</i>, that triumphant buoyancy which the child experiences
-when he feels his complete identification with a social group; that
-sense of security which comes upon him sitting in a theatre or “at a
-party,” when he issues forth from himself and is lost in a fairyland
-which has been evoked not only by his own imagination, but by that of
-his companions as well. This power of association, of assimilation,
-which children possess in such a high degree, is easily carried over
-into the affairs of youth if it but be given opportunity and freedom
-for action, as it is in the college life of more favored young people.
-The <i>esprit de corps</i> of an athletic team, that astonishing force
-of co-operation, is, however,<span class="pagenum" id="Page_173">[Pg 173]</span> never consciously carried over into
-industry, but is persistently disregarded. It is, indeed, lost before
-it is discovered—if I may be permitted an Irish bull—in the case of
-children who are put to work before they have had time to develop the
-power beyond its most childish and haphazard manifestations.</p>
-
-<p>Factory life depends upon groups of people working together, and yet
-it is content with the morphology of the group, as it were, paying
-no attention to its psychology, to the interaction of its members.
-By regarding each producer as a solitary unit, a tremendous power is
-totally unutilized. In the case of children who are prematurely put to
-work under such conditions, an unwarranted nervous strain is added as
-they make their effort to stand up to the individual duties of life
-while still in the stage of group and family dependence.</p>
-
-<p>We naturally associate a factory with orderly productive action; but
-similarity of action, without identical thought and co-operative
-intelligence, is coercion, and not order. The present factory
-discipline needs to be redeemed as the old school discipline has been
-redeemed. In the latter the system of prizes and punishments has been
-largely given up, not only because they were difficult to<span class="pagenum" id="Page_174">[Pg 174]</span> administer,
-but because they utterly failed to free the powers of the child.</p>
-
-<p>“The fear of starvation,” of which the old economists made so much, is,
-after all, but a poor incentive to work; and the appeal to cupidity
-by which a man is induced to “speed up” in all the various devices of
-piece-work is very little better. Yet the factory still depends upon
-these as incentives to the ordinary workers. Certainly one would wish
-to protect children from them as long as possible. In a soap factory
-in Chicago little girls wrap bars of soap in two covers at the minimum
-rate of 3,000 bars a week; their only ambition is to wrap as fast as
-possible and well enough to pass the foreman’s inspection. The girl
-whose earnings are the largest at the end of the week is filled with
-pride—praiseworthy, certainly, but totally without educational value.</p>
-
-<p>Let us realize before it is too late that in this age of iron, of
-machine-tending, and of subdivided labor, we need as never before
-the untrammeled and inspired activity of youth. To cut it off from
-thousands of working children is a most perilous undertaking, and
-endangers the very industry to which they have been sacrificed.</p>
-
-<p>Only of late years has an effort been made by the city authorities,
-by the municipality itself, to conserve the play instinct and to
-utilize it, if not<span class="pagenum" id="Page_175">[Pg 175]</span> for the correction of industry, at least for the
-nurture of citizenship. It has been discovered that the city which is
-too careless to provide playgrounds, gymnasiums, and athletic fields
-where the boys legitimately belong and which the policeman is bound to
-respect, simply puts a premium on lawlessness. Without these places
-of their own, groups of boys come to look upon the policeman as an
-enemy, and he regards them as the most lawless of all the citizens.
-This is partly due to the fact that because of our military survivals
-the officer is not brought in contact with the educational forces of
-the city, but only with its vices and crime. He might have quite as
-great an opportunity for influencing the morals of youth as the school
-teacher has. At least one American city spends twenty per cent. more in
-provision for the conviction of youths than for their education, for
-the city which fails to utilize this promising material of youthful
-adventure does not truly get rid of it, and finds it more expensive to
-care for as waste material than as educative material. At a certain
-age a boy is possessed by a restless determination to do something
-dangerous and exciting—a “difficult stunt,” as it were—by which he
-may prove that he is master of his fate and thus express his growing
-self-assertion. He prefers to demonstrate<span class="pagenum" id="Page_176">[Pg 176]</span> in feats requiring both
-courage and adroitness, and it may be said that tradition is with him
-in his choice. That this impulse is mixed with an absurd desire on the
-part of the boy to “show off,” to impress his companions with the fact
-that he is great and brave and generally to be admired, does not in
-the least affect its genuineness. The city which fails to provide an
-opportunity for this inevitable and normal desire on the part of the
-young citizens makes a grave mistake and invites irregular expression
-of it. The thwarted spirit of adventure finds an outlet in infinite
-varieties of gambling; craps, cards, the tossing of discarded union
-buttons, the betting on odd or even automobile numbers, on the number
-of newspapers under a boy’s arm. Another end which can be accomplished,
-if the city recognizes play as legitimate and provides playgrounds
-and athletic fields, is the development of that self-government and
-self-discipline among groups of boys, which forms the most natural
-basis for democratic political life later.</p>
-
-<p>The boy in a tenement-house region who does not belong to the gang is
-not only an exception, but a very rare exception. This earliest form
-of social life is almost tribal in its organization, and the leader
-too often holds his place because he is a successful bully. The gang
-meets first upon the<span class="pagenum" id="Page_177">[Pg 177]</span> street, but later it may possess a club room in
-a stable, in a billiard room, in an empty house, under the viaduct,
-in a candy store, in a saloon or even in an empty lot. The spirit of
-association, the fellowship and loyalty which the group inspires,
-carry them into many dangers; but there is no doubt that it is through
-these experiences that the city boy learns his political lessons.
-The training for political life is given in these gangs, and also an
-opportunity to develop that wonderful power of adaptation which is the
-city’s contribution, even to the poorest of her children. A clever
-man once told me that he doubted whether an alderman could be elected
-in a tenement-house district unless he had had gang experience, and
-had become an adept in the interminable discussion which every detail
-of the gang’s activity receives. This alone affords a training in
-democratic government, for it is the prerogative of democracy to invest
-political discussion with the dignity of deeds, and to provide adequate
-motives for discussion. In these social folk-motes, so to speak, the
-young citizen learns to act upon his own determination. The great pity
-is that it so often results in a group morality untouched by a concern
-for the larger morality of the community. Normal groups reacting upon
-each other would tend to an equilibrium of a certain liberty to all,<span class="pagenum" id="Page_178">[Pg 178]</span>
-but this cannot be accomplished in the life of the street where the
-weaker boy or the weaker gang is continually getting the worst of
-it. And it is only on the protected playground that the gangs can be
-merged into baseball nines and similar organizations, governed by
-well-recognized rules.</p>
-
-<p>We have already democratized education in the interests of the entire
-community; but recreation and constructive play, which afford the best
-soil for establishing genuine and democratic social relations, we have
-left untouched, although they are so valuable in emotional and dynamic
-power. Further than that, the city that refrains from educating the
-play motive is obliged to suppress it. In Chicago gangs of boys between
-fourteen and sixteen years of age, who, possessing work-certificates
-are outside of the jurisdiction of the truant officer, are continually
-being arrested by the police, since they have no orderly opportunity
-for recreation. An enlightened city government would regard these
-groups of boys as the natural soil in which to sow the seeds of
-self-government. As every European city has its parade-ground, where
-the mimics of war are faithfully rehearsed, in order that the country
-may be saved in times of danger, so, if modern government were as
-really concerned in developing its citizens as it is in defending them,
-we would look upon every<span class="pagenum" id="Page_179">[Pg 179]</span> playing-field as the training-place and
-parade-ground of mature citizenship.</p>
-
-<p>Frederick the Great discovered and applied the use of the rhythmic
-step for the marching of soldiers. For generations men had gone
-forth to war, using martial music as they had used the battle-cry,
-merely to incite their courage and war spirit; but the music had had
-nothing to do with their actual marching. The use of it as a practical
-measure enormously increased the endurance of the soldiers and raised
-the records of forced marches. Industry at the present moment, as
-represented by masses of men in the large factories, is quite as
-chaotic as the early armies were. We have failed to apply our education
-to the real life of the average factory producer. He works without any
-inner coherence or sense of comradeship. Our public education has done
-little as yet to release his powers or to cheer him with the knowledge
-of his significance to the State.</p>
-
-
-<div class="footnotes"><h3>FOOTNOTES:</h3>
-
-<div class="footnote">
-
-<p><a id="Footnote_12" href="#FNanchor_12" class="label">[12]</a> For further analysis of the census figures relating to
-children, consult “Some Ethical Gains Through Legislation.” Mrs.
-Florence Kelley.</p>
-
-</div>
-
-<div class="footnote">
-
-<p><a id="Footnote_13" href="#FNanchor_13" class="label">[13]</a> School and Society, by John Dewey.</p>
-
-</div>
-
-<div class="footnote">
-
-<p><a id="Footnote_14" href="#FNanchor_14" class="label">[14]</a> The Play of Man, Groos, page 394.</p>
-
-</div>
-</div>
-
-<hr class="chap x-ebookmaker-drop">
-
-<div class="chapter">
-<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_180">[Pg 180]</span></p>
-<h2 class="nobreak" id="CHAPTER_VII">CHAPTER VII<br><span class="small">UTILIZATION OF WOMEN IN CITY GOVERNMENT</span></h2></div>
-
-
-<p>We are told many times that the industrial city is a new thing upon the
-face of the earth, and that everywhere its growth has been phenomenal,
-whether we look at Moscow, Berlin, Paris, New York, or Chicago. With or
-without the mediaeval foundation, modern cities are merely resultants
-of the vast crowds of people who have collected at certain points which
-have become manufacturing and distributing centres.</p>
-
-<p>For all political purposes, however, the industrial origin of the city
-is entirely ignored, and political life is organized exclusively in
-relation to its earlier foundations.</p>
-
-<p>As the city itself originated for the common protection of the people
-and was built about a suitable centre of defense which formed a
-citadel, such as the Acropolis at Athens or the Kremlin at Moscow,
-so we can trace the beginning of the municipal franchise to the time
-when the problems of municipal government were still largely<span class="pagenum" id="Page_181">[Pg 181]</span> those of
-protecting the city against rebellion from within and against invasion
-from without. A voice in city government, as it was extended from the
-nobles, who alone bore arms, was naturally given solely to those who
-were valuable to the military system. There was a certain logic in
-giving the franchise only to grown men when the existence and stability
-of the city depended upon their defence, and when the ultimate value
-of the elector could be reduced to his ability to perform military
-duty. It was fair that only those who were liable to a sudden call to
-arms should be selected to decide as to the relations which the city
-should bear to rival cities, and that the vote for war should be cast
-by the same men who would bear the brunt of battle and the burden of
-protection. We are told by historians that the citizens were first
-called together in those assemblages which were the beginning of
-popular government, only if a war was to be declared or an expedition
-to be undertaken.</p>
-
-<p>But rival cities have long since ceased to settle their claims by force
-of arms, and we shall have to admit, I think, that this early test of
-the elector is no longer fitted to the modern city, whatever may be
-true, in the last analysis, of the basis for the Federal Government.</p>
-
-<p>It has been well said that the modern city is a<span class="pagenum" id="Page_182">[Pg 182]</span> stronghold of
-industrialism, quite as the feudal city was a stronghold of militarism,
-but the modern city fears no enemies, and rivals from without and
-its problems of government are solely internal. Affairs for the most
-part are going badly in these great new centres in which the quickly
-congregated population has not yet learned to arrange its affairs
-satisfactorily. Insanitary housing, poisonous sewage, contaminated
-water, infant mortality, the spread of contagion, adulterated food,
-impure milk, smoke-laden air, ill-ventilated factories, dangerous
-occupations, juvenile crime, unwholesome crowding, prostitution,
-and drunkenness are the enemies which the modern city must face and
-overcome would it survive. Logically, its electorate should be made up
-of those who can bear a valiant part in this arduous contest, of those
-who in the past have at least attempted to care for children, to clean
-houses, to prepare foods, to isolate the family from moral dangers, of
-those who have traditionally taken care of that side of life which, as
-soon as the population is congested, inevitably becomes the subject of
-municipal consideration and control.</p>
-
-<p>To test the elector’s fitness to deal with this situation by his
-ability to bear arms, is absurd. A city is in many respects a
-great business corporation,<span class="pagenum" id="Page_183">[Pg 183]</span> but in other respects it is enlarged
-housekeeping. If American cities have failed in the first, partly
-because office holders have carried with them the predatory instinct
-learned in competitive business, and cannot help “working a good thing”
-when they have an opportunity, may we not say that city housekeeping
-has failed partly because women, the traditional housekeepers, have
-not been consulted as to its multiform activities? The men of the city
-have been carelessly indifferent to much of this civic housekeeping, as
-they have always been indifferent to the details of the household. They
-have totally disregarded a candidate’s capacity to keep the streets
-clean, preferring to consider him in relation to the national tariff or
-to the necessity for increasing the national navy, in a pure spirit of
-reversion to the traditional type of government which had to do only
-with enemies and outsiders.</p>
-
-<p>It is difficult to see what military prowess has to do with the
-multiform duties, which, in a modern city, include the care of parks
-and libraries, superintendence of markets, sewers, and bridges,
-the inspection of provisions and boilers, and the proper disposal
-of garbage. Military prowess has nothing to do with the building
-department which the city maintains to see to it that the basements be
-dry, that the bedrooms be large<span class="pagenum" id="Page_184">[Pg 184]</span> enough to afford the required cubic
-feet of air, that the plumbing be sanitary, that the gas-pipes do not
-leak, that the tenement-house court be large enough to afford light
-and ventilation, and that the stairways be fireproof. The ability to
-carry arms has nothing to do with the health department maintained by
-the city, which provides that children be vaccinated, that contagious
-diseases be isolated and placarded, that the spread of tuberculosis be
-curbed, and that the water be free from typhoid infection. Certainly
-the military conception of society is remote from the functions of the
-school boards, whose concern it is that children be educated, that they
-be supplied with kindergartens and be given a decent place in which to
-play. The very multifariousness and complexity of a city government
-demands the help of minds accustomed to detail and variety of work, to
-a sense of obligation for the health and welfare of young children, and
-to a responsibility for the cleanliness and comfort of others.</p>
-
-<p>Because all these things have traditionally been in the hands of
-women, if they take no part in them now, they are not only missing the
-education which the natural participation in civic life would bring to
-them, but they are losing what they have always had. From the beginning
-of tribal life women have been held responsible for the health<span class="pagenum" id="Page_185">[Pg 185]</span> of
-the community, a function which is now represented by the health
-department; from the days of the cave dwellers, so far as the home
-was clean and wholesome, it was due to their efforts, which are now
-represented by the bureau of tenement-house inspection; from the period
-of the primitive village, the only public sweeping performed was what
-they undertook in their own dooryards, that which is now represented by
-the bureau of street cleaning. Most of the departments in a modern city
-can be traced to woman’s traditional activity, but in spite of this,
-so soon as these old affairs were turned over to the care of the city,
-they slipped from woman’s hands, apparently because they then became
-matters for collective action and implied the use of the franchise.
-Because the franchise had in the first instance been given to the man
-who could fight, because in the beginning he alone could vote who could
-carry a weapon, the franchise was considered an improper thing for a
-woman to possess.</p>
-
-<p>Is it quite public spirited for women to say, “We will take care of
-these affairs so long as they stay in our own houses, but if they go
-outside and concern so many people that they cannot be carried on
-without the mechanism of the vote, we will drop them. It is true that
-these activities which women have always had, are not at present<span class="pagenum" id="Page_186">[Pg 186]</span> being
-carried on very well by the men in most of the great American cities,
-but because we do not consider it ‘ladylike’ to vote shall we ignore
-their failure”?</p>
-
-<p>Because women consider the government men’s affair and something
-which concerns itself with elections and alarms, they have become so
-confused in regard to their traditional business in life, the rearing
-of children, that they hear with complacency a statement made by the
-Nestor of sanitary reformers, that one-half of the tiny lives which
-make up the city’s death rate each year might be saved by a more
-thorough application of sanitary science. Because it implies the use of
-the suffrage, they do not consider it women’s business to save these
-lives. Are we going to lose ourselves in the old circle of convention
-and add to that sum of wrong-doing which is continually committed
-in the world because we do not look at things as they really are?
-Old-fashioned ways which no longer apply to changed conditions are a
-snare in which the feet of women have always become readily entangled.
-It is so easy to believe that things that used to exist still go
-on long after they are passed; it is so easy to commit irreparable
-blunders because we fail to correct our theories by our changing
-experience. So many of the stumbling-blocks against which<span class="pagenum" id="Page_187">[Pg 187]</span> we fall are
-the opportunities to which we have not adjusted ourselves. Because it
-shocks an obsolete ideal, we keep hold of a convention which no longer
-squares with our genuine insight, and we are slow to follow a clue
-which might enable us to solace and improve the life about us.</p>
-
-<p>Why is it that women do not vote upon the matters which concern them
-so intimately? Why do they not follow these vital affairs and feel
-responsible for their proper administration, even though they have
-become municipalized? What would the result have been could women
-have regarded the suffrage, not as a right or a privilege, but as a
-mere piece of governmental machinery without which they could not
-perform their traditional functions under the changed conditions of
-city life? Could we view the whole situation as a matter of obligation
-and of normal development, it would be much simplified. We are at the
-beginning of a prolonged effort to incorporate a progressive developing
-life founded upon a response to the needs of all the people, into the
-requisite legal enactments and civic institutions. To be in any measure
-successful, this effort will require all the intelligent powers of
-observation, all the sympathy, all the common sense which may be gained
-from the whole adult population.</p>
-
-<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_188">[Pg 188]</span></p>
-
-<p>The statement is sometimes made that the franchise for women would be
-valuable only so far as the educated women exercised it. This statement
-totally disregards the fact that those matters in which woman’s
-judgment is most needed are far too primitive and basic to be largely
-influenced by what we call education. The sanitary condition of all
-the factories and workshops, for instance, in which the industrial
-processes are at present carried on in great cities, intimately affect
-the health and lives of thousands of workingwomen.</p>
-
-<p>It is questionable whether women to-day, in spite of the fact that
-there are myriads of them in factories and shops, are doing their
-full share of the world’s work in the lines of production which have
-always been theirs. Even two centuries ago they did practically all
-the spinning, dyeing, weaving, and sewing. They carried on much of the
-brewing and baking and thousands of operations which have been pushed
-out of the domestic system into the factory system. But simply to keep
-on doing the work which their grandmothers did, was to find themselves
-surrounded by conditions over which they have no control.</p>
-
-<p>Sometimes when I see dozens of young girls going into the factories of
-a certain biscuit company<span class="pagenum" id="Page_189">[Pg 189]</span> on the West Side of Chicago, they appear for
-the moment as a mere cross-section in the long procession of women who
-have furnished the breadstuffs from time immemorial, from the savage
-woman who ground the meal and baked a flat cake, through innumerable
-cottage hearths, kitchens, and bake ovens, to this huge concern in
-which they are still carrying on their traditional business. But always
-before, during the ages of this unending procession, women themselves
-were able to dictate concerning the hours and the immediate conditions
-of their work; even grinding the meal and baking the cake in the ashes
-was diversified by many other activities. But suddenly, since the
-application of steam to the processes of kneading bread and of turning
-the spindle, which really means only a different motor power and not
-in the least an essential change in her work, she has been denied the
-privilege of regulating the conditions which immediately surround her.</p>
-
-<p>In the census of 1900, the section on “Occupations” shows very clearly
-in what direction the employment of women has been tending during the
-last twenty years. Two striking facts stand out vividly: first, the
-increase in the percentage of workingwomen over the percentage of men,
-and second, the large percentage of young women<span class="pagenum" id="Page_190">[Pg 190]</span> between sixteen and
-twenty years old in the total number of workingwomen as compared with
-the small percentage of young men of the same ages in the total number
-of workingmen. Practically one-half of the workingwomen in the United
-States are girls—young women under the age of twenty-five years. This
-increase in the number of young girls in industry is the more striking
-when taken in connection with the fact that industries of to-day differ
-most markedly from those of the past in the relentless speed which
-they require. This increase in speed is as marked in the depths of
-sweat-shop labor as in the most advanced New England mills, where the
-eight looms operated by each worker have increased to twelve, fourteen,
-and even sixteen looms. This speed, of course, brings a new strain into
-industry and tends inevitably to nervous exhaustion. Machines may be
-revolved more and more swiftly, but the girl workers have no increase
-in vitality responding to the heightened pressure. An ampler and more
-far-reaching protection than now exists, is needed in order to care
-for the health and safety of women in industry. Their youth, their
-helplessness, their increasing numbers, the conditions under which
-they are employed, all call for uniform and enforceable statutes. The
-elaborate regulations of dangerous<span class="pagenum" id="Page_191">[Pg 191]</span> trades, enacted in England and on
-the Continent for both adults and children, find no parallel in the
-United States. The injurious effects of employments involving the use
-of poisons, acids, gases, atmospheric extremes, or other dangerous
-processes, still await adequate investigation and legislation in this
-country. How shall this take place, save by the concerted efforts of
-the women themselves, those who are employed, and those other women who
-are intelligent as to the worker’s needs and who possess a conscience
-in regard to industrial affairs?</p>
-
-<p>It is legitimate and necessary that women should make a study of
-certain trades and occupations. The production of sweated goods,
-from the human point of view, is not production at all, but waste.
-If the employer takes from the workers week by week more than his
-wages restore to them, he gradually reduces them to the state of
-industrial parasites. The wages of the sweated worker are either being
-supplemented by the wages of relatives and the gifts of charitable
-associations, or else her standard of living is so low that she is
-continually losing her vitality and tending to become a charge upon the
-community in a hospital or a poorhouse.<a id="FNanchor_15" href="#Footnote_15" class="fnanchor">[15]</a></p>
-
-<p>Yet even the sweat-shops, in which woman carries<span class="pagenum" id="Page_192">[Pg 192]</span> on her old business
-of making clothing, had to be redeemed, so far as they have been
-redeemed, by the votes of men who passed an anti-sweat-shop law; by
-the city fathers, who, after much pleading, were induced to order
-an inspection of sweat-shops that they might be made to comply with
-sanitary regulations. Women directly controlled the surroundings of
-their work as long as their arrangements were domestic, but they
-cannot do this now unless they have the franchise, as yet the only
-mechanism devised by which a city selects its representative and by
-which a number of persons are able to embody their collective will in
-legislation. For a hundred years England has been legislating upon
-the subject of insanitary workshops, long and exhausting hours of
-work, night work for women, occupations in which pregnant women may
-be employed, and hundreds of other restrictions which we are only
-beginning to consider objects of legislation here.</p>
-
-<p>So far as women have been able, in Chicago at least, to help the
-poorest workers in the sweat-shops, it has been accomplished by women
-organized into trades unions. The organization of Special Order Tailors
-found that it was comparatively simple for an employer to give the
-skilled operatives in a clothing factory more money by taking it away
-from the wages of the seam-sewer<span class="pagenum" id="Page_193">[Pg 193]</span> and button-holer. The fact that it
-resulted in one set of workers being helped at the expense of another
-set did not appeal to him, so long as he was satisfying the demand of
-the union without increasing the total cost of production. But the
-Special Order Tailors, at the sacrifice of their own wages and growth,
-made a determined effort to include even the sweat-shop workers in the
-benefits they had slowly secured for themselves. By means of the use
-of the label they were finally able to insist that no goods should be
-given out for home-finishing save to women presenting union cards, and
-they raised the wages from nine and eleven cents a dozen for finishing
-garments, to the minimum wage of fifteen cents. They also made a
-protest against the excessive subdivision of the labor upon garments, a
-practice which enables the manufacturer to use children and the least
-skilled adults. Thirty-two persons are commonly employed upon a single
-coat, and it is the purpose of the Special Order Tailors to have all
-the machine work performed by one worker, thus reducing the number
-working on one coat to twelve or fourteen. As this change will at the
-same time demand more skill on the part of the operator, and will
-increase the variety and interest in his work, these garment-makers
-are sacrificing both time and money for the defence of<span class="pagenum" id="Page_194">[Pg 194]</span> Ruskinian
-principles—one of the few actual attempts to recover the “joy of
-work.” Although the attempt was, of course, mixed with a desire to
-preserve a trade from the invasion of the unskilled, and a consequent
-lowering of wages, it also represented a genuine effort to preserve to
-the poorest worker some interest and value in the work itself. It is
-most unfair, however, to put this task upon the trades unionists and to
-so confuse it with their other efforts that it, too, becomes a cause
-of warfare. The poorest women are often but uncomprehending victims of
-this labor movement of which they understand so little, and which has
-become so much a matter of battle that helpless individuals are lost in
-the conflict.</p>
-
-<p>A complicated situation occurs to me in illustration. A woman from
-the Hull-House Day Nursery came to me two years ago asking to borrow
-twenty-five dollars, a sum her union had imposed as a fine. She gave
-such an incoherent account of her plight that it was evident that
-she did not in the least understand what it was all about. A little
-investigation disclosed the following facts: The “Nursery Mother,”
-as I here call her for purposes of identification, had worked for a
-long time in an unorganized overall factory, where the proprietor,
-dealing as he<span class="pagenum" id="Page_195">[Pg 195]</span> did in goods purchased exclusively by workingmen, found
-it increasingly difficult to sell his overalls because they did not
-bear the union label. He finally made a request to the union that the
-employees in his factory be organized. This was done, he was given the
-use of the label, and upon this basis he prospered for several months.</p>
-
-<p>Whether the organizer was “fixed” or not, the investigation did
-not make clear; for, although the “Nursery Mother,” with her
-fellow-workers, had paid their union dues regularly, the employer was
-not compelled to pay the union scale of wages, but continued to pay
-the same wages as before. At the end of three months his employees
-discovered that they were not being paid the union scale, and demanded
-that their wages be raised to that amount. The employer, in the
-meantime having extensively advertised his use of the label, concluded
-that his purpose had been served, and that he no longer needed the
-union. He refused, therefore, to pay the union scale, and a strike
-ensued. The “Nursery Mother” went out with the rest, and within a few
-days found work in another shop, a union shop doing a lower grade of
-manufacturing. At that time there was no uniform scale in the garment
-trades, and although a trade unionist working for union wages, she
-received lower wages than she had under<span class="pagenum" id="Page_196">[Pg 196]</span> the non-union conditions in
-the overall factory. She was naturally much confused and, following
-her instinct to get the best wages possible, she went back to her
-old place. Affairs ran smoothly for a few weeks, until the employer
-discovered that he was again losing trade because his goods lacked
-the label, whereupon he once more applied to have his shop unionized.
-The organizer, coming back, promptly discovered the recreant “Nursery
-Mother,” and, much to her bewilderment, she was fined twenty-five
-dollars. She understood nothing clearly, nor could she, indeed, be made
-to understand so long as she was in the midst of this petty warfare.
-Her labor was a mere method of earning money quite detached from her
-European experience, and failed to make for her the remotest connection
-with the community whose genuine needs she was supplying. No effort
-had been made to show her the cultural aspect of her work, to give her
-even the feeblest understanding of the fact that she was supplying a
-genuine need of the community, and that she was entitled to respect
-and a legitimate industrial position. It would have been necessary to
-make such an effort from the historic standpoint, and this could be
-undertaken only by the community as a whole and not by any one class in
-it. Protective legislation would be but the first step toward making
-her a<span class="pagenum" id="Page_197">[Pg 197]</span> more valuable producer and a more intelligent citizen. The whole
-effort would imply a closer connection between industry and government,
-and could be accomplished intelligently only if women were permitted to
-exercise the franchise.</p>
-
-<p>A certain healing and correction would doubtless ensue could we but
-secure for the protection and education of industrial workers that
-nurture of health and morals which women have so long reserved for
-their own families and which has never been utilized as a directing
-force in industrial affairs.</p>
-
-<p>When the family constituted the industrial organism of the day, the
-daughters of the household were carefully taught in reference to the
-place they would take in that organism, but as the household arts have
-gone outside the home, almost nothing has been done to connect the
-young women with the present great industrial system. This neglect has
-been equally true in regard to the technical and cultural sides of that
-system.</p>
-
-<p>The failure to fit the education of women to the actual industrial
-life which is carried on about them has had disastrous results in two
-directions. First, industry itself has lacked the modification which
-women might have brought to it had they committed the entire movement
-to that<span class="pagenum" id="Page_198">[Pg 198]</span> growing concern for a larger and more satisfying life for each
-member of the community, a concern which we have come to regard as
-legitimate. Second, the more prosperous women would have been able to
-understand and adjust their own difficulties of household management in
-relation to the producer of factory products, as they are now utterly
-unable to do.</p>
-
-<p>As the census of 1900 showed that more than half of the women
-employed in “gainful occupations” in the United States are engaged
-in households, certainly their conditions of labor lie largely in
-the hands of women employers. At a conference held at Lake Placid by
-employers of household labor, it was contended that future historical
-review may show that the girls who are to-day in domestic service
-are the really progressive women of the age; that they are those
-who are fighting conditions which limit their freedom, and although
-they are doing it blindly, at least they are demanding avenues of
-self-expression outside their work; and that this struggle from
-conditions detrimental to their highest life is the ever-recurring
-story of the emancipation of first one class and then another. It was
-further contended that in this effort to become sufficiently educated
-to be able to understand the needs of an educated employer from an
-independent standpoint,<span class="pagenum" id="Page_199">[Pg 199]</span> they are really doing the community a great
-service, and did they but receive co-operation instead of opposition,
-domestic service would lose its social ostracism and attract a more
-intelligent class of women. And yet this effort, perfectly reasonable
-from the standpoint of historic development and democratic tradition,
-receives little help from the employing housekeepers, because they know
-nothing of industrial development.</p>
-
-<p>The situation could be understood only by viewing it, first, in the
-relation to recent immigration and, second, in connection with the
-factory system at the present stage of development in America. A review
-of the history of domestic service in a fairly prosperous American
-family begins with the colonial period, when the daughters of the
-neighboring farmers came in to “help” during the busy season. This was
-followed by the Irish immigrant, when almost every kitchen had its Nora
-or Bridget, while the mistress of the household retained the sweeping
-and dusting and the Saturday baking. Then came the halcyon days of
-German “second girls” and cooks, followed by the Swedes. The successive
-waves of immigration supply the demand for domestic service, gradually
-obliterating the fact that as the women became more familiar with<span class="pagenum" id="Page_200">[Pg 200]</span>
-American customs, they as well as their men folk, entered into more
-skilled and lucrative positions.</p>
-
-<p>In these last years immigration consists in ever-increasing numbers
-of South Italians and of Russian, Polish, and Rumanian Jews, none of
-whom have to any appreciable extent entered into domestic service. The
-Italian girls are married between the ages of fifteen and eighteen, and
-to live in any house in town other than that of her father seems to an
-Italian girl quite incomprehensible. The strength of the family tie,
-the need for “kosher” foods, the celebration of religious festivities,
-the readiness with which she takes up the sewing trades in which her
-father and brother are already largely engaged, makes domestic service
-a rare occupation for the daughters of the recent Jewish immigrants.
-Moreover, these two classes of immigrants have been quickly absorbed,
-as, indeed, all working people are, by the increasing demand for the
-labor of young girls and children in factory and workshops. The paucity
-of the material for domestic service is therefore revealed at last, and
-we are obliged to consider the material for domestic service which a
-democracy supplies, and also to realize that the administration of the
-household has suffered because it has become unnaturally isolated from
-the rest of the community.</p>
-
-<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_201">[Pg 201]</span></p>
-
-<p>The problems of food and shelter for the family, at any given
-moment, must be considered in relation to all the other mechanical
-and industrial life of that moment, quite as the intellectual life
-of the family finally depends for its vitality upon its relation to
-the intellectual resources of the rest of the community. When the
-administrator of the household deliberately refuses to avail herself
-of the wonderful inventions going on all about her, she soon comes
-to the point of priding herself upon the fact that her household is
-administered according to traditional lines and of believing that the
-moral life of the family is so enwrapped in these old customs as to
-be endangered by any radical change. Because of this attitude on the
-part of contemporary housekeepers, the household has firmly withstood
-the beneficent changes and healing innovations which applied science
-and economics would long ago have brought about could they have worked
-naturally and unimpeded.</p>
-
-<p>These moral and economic difficulties, whether connected with the
-isolation of the home or with the partial and unsatisfactory efforts
-of trades unions, could be avoided only if society would frankly
-recognize the industrial situation as that which concerns us all,
-and would seriously prepare all classes of the community for their
-relation<span class="pagenum" id="Page_202">[Pg 202]</span> to the situation. A technical preparation would, of course,
-not be feasible, but a cultural one would be possible, so that all
-parts of the community might be intelligent in regard to the industrial
-developments and transitions going on about them. If American women
-could but obtain a liberating knowledge of that history of industry
-and commerce which is so similar in every country of the globe, the
-fact that so much factory labor is performed by immigrants would
-help to bring them nearer to the immigrant woman. Equipped with “the
-informing mind” on the one hand and with experience on the other, we
-could then walk together through the marvelous streets of the human
-city, no longer conscious whether we are natives or aliens, because
-we have become absorbed in a fraternal relation arising from a common
-experience.</p>
-
-<p>And this attitude of understanding and respect for the worker is
-necessary, not only to appreciate what he produces, but to preserve
-his power of production, again showing the necessity for making that
-substitute for war—human labor—more aggressive and democratic. We
-are told that the conquered races everywhere, in their helplessness,
-are giving up the genuine practise of their own arts. In India, for
-instance, where their arts have been the blossom of many years of
-labor,<span class="pagenum" id="Page_203">[Pg 203]</span> the conquered races are casting them aside as of no value in
-order that they may conform to the inferior art, or rather, lack of
-art, of their conquerors. Morris constantly lamented that in some parts
-of India the native arts were quite destroyed, and in many others
-nearly so; that in all parts they had more or less begun to sicken.
-This lack of respect and understanding of the primitive arts found
-among colonies of immigrants in a modern cosmopolitan city, produces
-a like result in that the arts languish and disappear. We have made
-an effort at Hull-House to recover something of the early industries
-from an immigrant neighborhood, and in a little exhibit called a
-labor museum, we have placed in historic sequence and order methods
-of spinning and weaving from a dozen nationalities in Asia Minor and
-Europe. The result has been a striking exhibition of the unity and
-similarity of the earlier industrial processes. Within the narrow
-confines of one room, the Syrian, the Greek, the Italian, the Russian,
-the Norwegian, the Dutch, and the Irish find that the differences in
-their spinning have been merely putting the distaff upon a frame or
-placing the old hand-spindle in a horizontal position. A group of women
-representing vast differences in religion, in language, in tradition,
-and in nationality, exhibit practically no difference<span class="pagenum" id="Page_204">[Pg 204]</span> in the daily
-arts by which, for a thousand generations, they have clothed their
-families. When American women come to visit them, the quickest method,
-in fact almost the only one, of establishing a genuine companionship
-with them, is through this same industry, unless we except that
-still older occupation, the care of little children. Perhaps this
-experiment may claim to have made a genuine effort to find the basic
-experiences upon which a cosmopolitan community may unite at least on
-the industrial side. The recent date of the industrial revolution and
-our nearness to a primitive industry are shown by the fact that Italian
-mothers are more willing to have their daughters work in factories
-producing textile and food stuffs than in those which produce wood and
-metal. They interpret the entire situation so simply that it appears
-to them just what it is—a mere continuation of woman’s traditional
-work under changed conditions. Another example of our nearness to early
-methods is shown by the fact that many women from South Italy and from
-the remoter parts of Russia have never seen a spinning-wheel, and
-look upon it as a new and marvelous invention. But these very people,
-who are habitually at such a disadvantage because they lack certain
-superficial qualities which are too highly prized, have an opportunity
-in the labor museum,<span class="pagenum" id="Page_205">[Pg 205]</span> at least for the moment, to assert a position in
-the community to which their previous life and training entitles them,
-and they are judged with something of a historic background. Their very
-apparent remoteness gives industrial processes a picturesque content
-and charm.</p>
-
-<p>Can we learn our first lesson in modern industry from these humble
-peasant women who have never shirked the primitive labors upon which
-all civilized life is founded, even as we must obtain our first
-lessons in social morality from those who are bearing the brunt of
-the overcrowded and cosmopolitan city which is the direct result of
-modern industrial conditions? If we contend that the franchise should
-be extended to women on the ground that less emphasis is continually
-placed upon the military order and more upon the industrial order of
-society, we should have to insist that, if she would secure her old
-place in industry, the modern woman must needs fit her labors to the
-present industrial organization as the simpler woman fitted hers to the
-more simple industrial order. It has been pointed out that woman lost
-her earlier place when man usurped the industrial pursuits and created
-wealth on a scale unknown before. Since that time women have been
-reduced more and more to a state of dependency, until we see only among
-the<span class="pagenum" id="Page_206">[Pg 206]</span> European peasant women as they work in the fields, “the heavy,
-strong, enduring, patient, economically functional representative of
-what the women of our day used to be.”</p>
-
-<p>Cultural education as it is at present carried on in the most advanced
-schools, is to some extent correcting the present detached relation
-of women to industry but a sense of responsibility in relation to the
-development of industry would accomplish much more. As men earned
-their citizenship through their readiness and ability to defend their
-city, so perhaps woman, if she takes a citizen’s place in the modern
-industrial city, will have to earn it by devotion and self-abnegation
-in the service of its complex needs.</p>
-
-<p>The old social problems were too often made a cause of war in the
-belief that all difficulties could be settled by an appeal to arms. But
-certainly these subtler problems which confront the modern cosmopolitan
-city, the problems of race antagonisms and economic adjustments, must
-be settled by a more searching and genuine method than mere prowess
-can possibly afford. The first step toward their real solution must
-be made upon a past experience common to the citizens as a whole and
-connected with their daily living. As moral problems become more and
-more associated with our civic and industrial organizations,<span class="pagenum" id="Page_207">[Pg 207]</span> the
-demand for enlarged activity is more exigent. If one could connect the
-old maternal anxieties, which are really the basis of family and tribal
-life, with the candidates who are seeking offices, it would never be
-necessary to look about for other motive powers, and if to this we
-could add maternal concern for the safety and defence of the industrial
-worker, we should have an increasing code of protective legislation.</p>
-
-<p>We certainly may hope for two results if women enter formally into
-municipal life. First, the opportunity to fulfill their old duties and
-obligations with the safeguard and the consideration which the ballot
-alone can secure for them under the changed conditions, and, second,
-the education which participation in actual affairs always brings.
-As we believe that woman has no right to allow what really belongs
-to her to drop away from her, so we contend that ability to perform
-an obligation comes very largely in proportion as that obligation is
-conscientiously assumed.</p>
-
-<p>Out of the mediaeval city founded upon militarism there arose in the
-thirteenth century a new order, the middle class, whose importance
-rested, not upon birth or arms, but upon wealth, intelligence, and
-organization. This middle class achieved a sterling success in the
-succeeding six centuries of industrialism because it was essential<span class="pagenum" id="Page_208">[Pg 208]</span> to
-the existence and development of the industrial era. Perhaps we can
-forecast the career of woman, the citizen, if she is permitted to bear
-an elector’s part in the coming period of humanitarianism in which
-government must concern itself with human welfare. She will bear her
-share of civic responsibility because she is essential to the normal
-development of the city of the future, and because the definition
-of the loyal citizen as one who is ready to shed his blood for his
-country, has become inadequate and obsolete.</p>
-
-
-<div class="footnotes"><h3>FOOTNOTES:</h3>
-
-<div class="footnote">
-
-<p><a id="Footnote_15" href="#FNanchor_15" class="label">[15]</a> A Case for the Factory Acts. Mrs. Sidney Webb.</p>
-
-</div>
-</div>
-
-<hr class="chap x-ebookmaker-drop">
-
-<div class="chapter">
-<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_209">[Pg 209]</span></p>
-<h2 class="nobreak" id="CHAPTER_VIII">CHAPTER VIII<br><span class="small">PASSING OF THE WAR VIRTUES</span></h2></div>
-
-
-<p>Of all the winged words which Tolstoy wrote during the war between
-Russia and Japan, perhaps none are more significant than these:
-“The great strife of our time is not that now taking place between
-the Japanese and the Russians, nor that which may blaze up between
-the white and the yellow races, nor that strife which is carried
-on by mines, bombs, and bullets, but that spiritual strife which,
-without ceasing, has gone on and is going on between the enlightened
-consciousness of mankind now awaiting for manifestation and that
-darkness and that burden which surrounds and oppresses mankind.” In
-the curious period of accommodation in which we live, it is possible
-for old habits and new compunctions to be equally powerful, and it is
-almost a matter of pride with us that we neither break with the old nor
-yield to the new. We call this attitude tolerance, whereas it is often
-mere confusion of mind. Such mental confusion is strikingly illustrated
-by our tendency to substitute a<span class="pagenum" id="Page_210">[Pg 210]</span> statement of the historic evolution of
-an ideal of conduct in place of the ideal itself. This almost always
-occurs when the ideal no longer accords with our faithful experience
-of life and when its implications are not justified by our latest
-information. In this way we spare ourselves the necessity of pressing
-forward to newer ideals of conduct.</p>
-
-<p>We quote the convictions and achievements of the past as an excuse for
-ourselves when we lack the energy either to throw off old moral codes
-which have become burdens or to attain a morality proportionate to our
-present sphere of activity.</p>
-
-<p>At the present moment the war spirit attempts to justify its noisy
-demonstrations by quoting its great achievements in the past and by
-drawing attention to the courageous life which it has evoked and
-fostered. It is, however, perhaps significant that the adherents of war
-are more and more justifying it by its past record and reminding us of
-its ancient origin. They tell us that it is interwoven with every fibre
-of human growth and is at the root of all that is noble and courageous
-in human life, that struggle is the basis of all progress, that it is
-now extended from individuals and tribes to nations and races.</p>
-
-<p>We may admire much that is admirable in this past life of courageous
-warfare, while at the<span class="pagenum" id="Page_211">[Pg 211]</span> same time we accord it no right to dominate
-the present, which has traveled out of its reach into a land of new
-desires. We may admit that the experiences of war have equipped the men
-of the present with pluck and energy, but to insist upon the selfsame
-expression for that pluck and energy would be as stupid a mistake as if
-we would relegate the full-grown citizen, responding to many claims and
-demands upon his powers, to the school-yard fights of his boyhood, or
-to the college contests of his cruder youth. The little lad who stoutly
-defends himself on the school-ground may be worthy of much admiration,
-but if we find him, a dozen years later, the bullying leader of a
-street-gang who bases his prestige on the fact that “no one can whip
-him,” our admiration cools amazingly, and we say that the carrying over
-of those puerile instincts into manhood shows arrested development
-which is mainly responsible for filling our prisons.</p>
-
-<p>This confusion between the contemporaneous stage of development and the
-historic rôle of certain qualities, is intensified by our custom of
-referring to social evolution as if it were a force and not a process.
-We assume that social ends may be obtained without the application of
-social energies, although we know in our hearts that the best results
-of civilization have come about<span class="pagenum" id="Page_212">[Pg 212]</span> only through human will and effort.
-To point to the achievement of the past as a guarantee for continuing
-what has since become shocking to us is stupid business; it is to
-forget that progress itself depends upon adaptation, upon a nice
-balance between continuity and change. Let us by all means acknowledge
-and preserve that which has been good in warfare and in the spirit of
-warfare; let us gather it together and incorporate it in our national
-fibre. Let us, however, not be guilty for a moment of shutting our
-eyes to that which for many centuries must have been disquieting to
-the moral sense, but which is gradually becoming impossible, not only
-because of our increasing sensibilities, but because great constructive
-plans and humanized interests have captured our hopes and we are
-finding that war is an implement too clumsy and barbaric to subserve
-our purpose. We have come to realize that the great task of pushing
-forward social justice could be enormously accelerated if primitive
-methods as well as primitive weapons were once for all abolished.</p>
-
-<p>The past may have been involved in war and suffering in order to bring
-forth a new and beneficent courage, an invincible ardor for conserving
-and healing human life, for understanding and elaborating it. To obtain
-this courage<span class="pagenum" id="Page_213">[Pg 213]</span> is to distinguish between a social order founded upon
-law enforced by authority and that other social order which includes
-liberty of individual action and complexity of group development. The
-latter social order would not suppress the least germ of promise, of
-growth and variety, but would nurture all into a full and varied life.
-It is not an easy undertaking to obtain it and it cannot be carried
-forward without conscious and well-defined effort. The task that is
-really before us is first to see to it, that the old virtues bequeathed
-by war are not retained after they have become a social deterrent and
-that social progress is not checked by a certain contempt for human
-nature which is but the inherited result of conquest. Second, we must
-act upon the assumption that spontaneous and fraternal action as virile
-and widespread as war itself is the only method by which substitutes
-for the war virtues may be discovered.</p>
-
-<p>It was contended in the first chapter of this book that social morality
-is developed through sentiment and action. In this particular age we
-can live the truth which has been apprehended by our contemporaries,
-that truth which is especially our own, only by establishing nobler and
-wiser social relations and by discovering social bonds better fitted
-to our requirements. Warfare in<span class="pagenum" id="Page_214">[Pg 214]</span> the past has done much to bring men
-together. A sense of common danger and the stirring appeal to action
-for a common purpose, easily open the channels of sympathy through
-which we partake of the life about us. But there are certainly other
-methods of opening those channels. A social life to be healthy must be
-consciously and fully adjusted to the march of social needs, and as we
-may easily make a mistake by forgetting that enlarged opportunities are
-ever demanding an enlarged morality, so we will fail in the task of
-substitution if we do not demand social sympathy in a larger measure
-and of a quality better adapted to the contemporaneous situation.</p>
-
-<p>Perhaps the one point at which this undertaking is most needed is in
-regard to our conception of patriotism, which, although as genuine
-as ever before, is too much dressed in the trappings of the past and
-continually carries us back to its beginnings in military prowess and
-defence. To have been able to trace the origin and development of
-patriotism and then to rest content with that, and to fail to insist
-that it shall respond to the stimulus of a larger and more varied
-environment with which we are now confronted, is a confession of
-weakness; it exhibits lack of moral enterprise and of national vigor.</p>
-
-<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_215">[Pg 215]</span></p>
-
-<p>We have all seen the breakdown of village standards of morality when
-the conditions of a great city are encountered. To do “the good lying
-next at hand” may be a sufficient formula when the village idler
-and his needy children live but a few doors down the street, but
-the same dictum may be totally misleading when the villager becomes
-a city resident and finds his next-door neighbors prosperous and
-comfortable, while the poor and overburdened live many blocks away
-where he would never see them at all, unless he were stirred by a
-spirit of social enterprise to go forth and find them in the midst
-of their meagre living and their larger needs. The spirit of village
-gossip, penetrating and keen as it is, may be depended upon to bring to
-the notice of the kind-hearted villager all cases of suffering—that
-someone is needed “to sit up all night” with a sick neighbor, or that
-the village loafer has been drunk again and beaten his wife; but in
-a city divided so curiously into the regions of the well-to-do and
-the congested quarters of the immigrant, the conscientious person
-can no longer rely upon gossip. There is no intercourse, not even a
-scattered one, between the two, save what the daily paper brings, with
-its invincible propensity to report the gossip of poverty and crime,
-perhaps a healthier tendency than we imagine. The man who has moved
-from<span class="pagenum" id="Page_216">[Pg 216]</span> the village to the cosmopolitan city and who would continue even
-his former share of beneficent activity must bestir himself to keep
-informed as to social needs and to make new channels through which his
-sympathy may flow. Without some such conscious effort, his sympathy
-will finally become stratified along the line of his social intercourse
-and he will be unable really to care for any people but his “own kind.”
-American conceptions of patriotism have moved, so to speak, from the
-New England village into huge cosmopolitan cities. They find themselves
-bewildered by the change and have not only failed to make the
-adjustment, but the very effort in that direction is looked upon with
-deep suspicion by their old village neighbors. Unless our conception of
-patriotism is progressive, it cannot hope to embody the real affection
-and the real interest of the nation. We know full well that the
-patriotism of common descent is the mere patriotism of the clan—the
-early patriotism of the tribe—and that, while the possession of a
-like territory is an advance upon that first conception, both of them
-are unworthy to be the patriotism of a great cosmopolitan nation. We
-shall not have made any genuine advance until we have grown impatient
-of a patriotism founded upon military prowess and defence, because this
-really gets in the way and<span class="pagenum" id="Page_217">[Pg 217]</span> prevents the growth of that beneficent and
-progressive patriotism which we need for the understanding and healing
-of our current national difficulties.</p>
-
-<p>To seek our patriotism in some age other than our own is to accept a
-code that is totally inadequate to help us through the problems which
-current life develops. We continue to found our patriotism upon war
-and to contrast conquest with nurture, militarism with industrialism,
-calling the latter passive and inert and the former active and
-aggressive, without really facing the situation as it exists. We
-tremble before our own convictions, and are afraid to find newer
-manifestations of courage and daring lest we thereby lose the virtues
-bequeathed to us by war. It is a pitiful acknowledgment that we have
-lost them already and that we shall have to give up the ways of war, if
-for no other reason than to preserve the finer spirit of courage and
-detachment which it has engendered and developed.</p>
-
-<p>We come at last to the practical question as to how these substitutes
-for the war virtues may be found. How may we, the children of an
-industrial and commercial age, find the courage and sacrifice which
-belong to our industrialism. We may begin with August Comte’s assertion
-that man seeks to improve his position in two different<span class="pagenum" id="Page_218">[Pg 218]</span> ways, by
-the destruction of obstacles and by the construction of means, or,
-designated by their most obvious social results, if his contention is
-correct, by military action and by industrial action, and that the two
-must long continue side by side. Then we find ourselves asking what
-may be done to make more picturesque those lives which are spent in a
-monotonous and wearing toil, compared to which the camp is exciting and
-the barracks comfortable. How shall it be made to seem as magnificent
-patiently to correct the wrongs of industrialism as to do battle for
-the rights of the nation? This transition ought not to be so difficult
-in America, for to begin with, our national life in America has been
-largely founded upon our success in invention and engineering, in
-manufacturing and commerce. Our prosperity has rested upon constructive
-labor and material progress, both of them in striking contrast to
-warfare. There is an element of almost grim humor in the nation’s
-reverting at last to the outworn methods of battle-ships and defended
-harbors. We may admit that idle men need war to keep alive their
-courage and endurance, but we have few idle men in a nation engaged
-in industrialism. We constantly see subordination of sensation to
-sentiment in hundreds of careers which are not military; the thousands
-of miners<span class="pagenum" id="Page_219">[Pg 219]</span> in Pennsylvania doubtless endure every year more bodily pain
-and peril than the same number of men in European barracks.</p>
-
-<p>Industrial life affords ample opportunity for endurance, discipline,
-and a sense of detachment, if the struggle is really put upon the
-highest level of industrial efficiency. But because our industrial life
-is not on this level, we constantly tend to drop the newer and less
-developed ideals for the older ones of warfare, we ignore the fact that
-war so readily throws back the ideals which the young are nourishing
-into the mold of those which the old should be outgrowing. It lures
-young men not to develop, but to exploit; it turns them from the
-courage and toil of industry to the bravery and endurance of war, and
-leads them to forget that civilization is the substitution of law for
-war. It incites their ambitions, not to irrigate, to make fertile and
-sanitary, the barren plain of the savage, but to fill it with military
-posts and tax-gatherers, to cease from pushing forward industrial
-action into new fields and to fall back upon military action.</p>
-
-<p>We may illustrate this by the most beneficent acts of war, when
-the military spirit claiming to carry forward civilization invades
-a country for the purpose of bringing it into the zone of the
-civilized world. Militarism enforces law and<span class="pagenum" id="Page_220">[Pg 220]</span> order and insists upon
-obedience and discipline, assuming that it will ultimately establish
-righteousness and foster progress. In order to carry out this good
-intention, it first of all clears the decks of impedimenta, although
-in the process it may extinguish the most precious beginnings of
-self-government and the nucleus of self-help, which the wise of the
-native community have long been anxiously hoarding.</p>
-
-<p>It is the military idea, resting content as it does with the passive
-results of order and discipline, which confesses a totally inadequate
-conception of the value and power of human life. The charge of
-obtaining negative results could with great candor be brought against
-militarism, while the strenuous task, the vigorous and difficult
-undertaking, involving the use of the most highly developed human
-powers, can be claimed for industrialism.</p>
-
-<p>It is really human constructive labor which must give the newly invaded
-country a sense of its place in the life of the civilized world, some
-idea of the effective occupations which it may perform. In order to
-accomplish this its energy must be freed and its resources developed.
-Militarism undertakes to set in order, to suppress and to govern, if
-necessary to destroy, while industrialism undertakes to liberate latent
-forces, to<span class="pagenum" id="Page_221">[Pg 221]</span> reconcile them to new conditions, to demonstrate that their
-aroused activities can no longer follow caprice, but must fit into a
-larger order of life. To call this latter undertaking, demanding ever
-new powers of insight, patience, and fortitude, less difficult, less
-manly, less strenuous, than the first, is on the face of it absurd.
-It is the soldier who is inadequate to the difficult task, who strews
-his ways with blunders and lost opportunities, who cannot justify his
-vocation by the results, and who is obliged to plead guilty to a lack
-of rational method.</p>
-
-<p>Of British government in the Empire, an Englishman has recently
-written, “We are obliged in practise to make a choice between good
-order and justice administered autocratically in accordance with
-British standards on the one hand, and delicate, costly, doubtful,
-and disorderly experiments in self-government on British lines upon
-the other, and we have practically everywhere decided upon the former
-alternative. It is, of course, less difficult.”<a id="FNanchor_16" href="#Footnote_16" class="fnanchor">[16]</a> Had our American
-ideals of patriotism and morality in international relations kept
-pace with our experience, had we followed up our wide commercial
-relations with an adequate ethical code, we can imagine a body of
-young Americans, “the flower of our youth,”<span class="pagenum" id="Page_222">[Pg 222]</span> as we like to say,
-proudly declining commercial advantages founded upon forced military
-occupation and informing their well-meaning government that they
-declined to accept openings on any such terms as these, that their
-ideals of patriotism and of genuine government demanded the play of
-their moral prowess and their constructive intelligence. Certainly in
-America we have a chance to employ something more active and virile,
-more inventive, more in line with our temperament and tradition, than
-the mere desire to increase commercial relations by armed occupation
-as other governments have done. A different conduct is required
-from a democracy than from the mere order-keeping, bridge-building,
-tax-gathering Roman, or from the conscientious Briton carrying the
-blessings of an established government and enlarged commerce to all
-quarters of the globe.</p>
-
-<p>It has been the time-honored custom to attribute unjust wars to the
-selfish ambition of rulers who remorselessly sacrifice their subjects
-to satisfy their greed. But, as Lecky has recently pointed out, it
-remains to be seen whether or not democratic rule will diminish war.
-Immoderate and uncontrolled desires are at the root of most national
-as well as of most individual crimes, and a large number of persons
-may be moved by unworthy ambitions quite as easily as a few. If the<span class="pagenum" id="Page_223">[Pg 223]</span>
-electorate of a democracy accustom themselves to take the commercial
-view of life, to consider the extension of trade as the test of a
-national prosperity, it becomes comparatively easy for mere extension
-of commercial opportunity to assume a moral aspect and to receive the
-moral sanction. Unrestricted commercialism is an excellent preparation
-for governmental aggression. The nation which is accustomed to condone
-the questionable business methods of a rich man because of his success,
-will find no difficulty in obscuring the moral issues involved in any
-undertaking that is successful. It becomes easy to deny the moral basis
-of self-government and to substitute militarism. The soldier formerly
-looked down upon the merchant whom he now obeys, as he still looks down
-upon the laborer as a man who is engaged in a business inferior to
-his own, as someone who is dull and passive and ineffective. When our
-public education succeeds in freeing the creative energy and developing
-the skill which the advance of industry demands, this attitude must
-disappear, and a spectacle such as that recently seen in London among
-the idle men returned from service in South Africa, who refused to work
-through a contemptuous attitude towards the “slow life” of the laborer,
-will become impossible. We have as yet failed to uncover the relative
-difficulty and<span class="pagenum" id="Page_224">[Pg 224]</span> requisite training for the two methods of life.</p>
-
-<p>It is difficult to illustrate on a national scale the substitution of
-the ideals of labor for those of warfare.</p>
-
-<p>At the risk of being absurd, and with the certainty of pushing an
-illustration beyond its legitimate limits, I am venturing to typify
-this substitution by the one man whom the civilized world has most
-closely associated with military ideals, the present Emperor of
-Germany. We may certainly believe that the German Emperor is a
-conscientious man, who means to do his duty to all his subjects; that
-he regards himself, not only as general and chief of the army, but also
-as the fostering father of the humble people. Let us imagine the quite
-impossible thing that for ten years he does not review any troops, does
-not attend any parades, does not wear a uniform, nor hear the clang of
-the sword as he walks, but that during these ten years he lives with
-the peasants “who drive the painful plow,” that he constantly converses
-with them, and subjects himself to their alternating hopes and fears
-as to the result of the harvest, at best so inadequate for supplying
-their wants and for paying their taxes. Let us imagine that the German
-Emperor during these halcyon years, in addition to the companionship
-of the humble, reads only the folk-lore, the minor poetry<span class="pagenum" id="Page_225">[Pg 225]</span> and the
-plaintive songs in which German literature is so rich, until he comes
-to see each man of the field as he daily goes forth to his toil “with a
-soldier tied to his back,” exhausted by the double strain of his burden
-and his work.</p>
-
-<p>Let us imagine this Emperor going through some such profound moral
-change as befell Count Tolstoy when he quitted his military service
-in the Caucasus and lived with the peasants on his estate, with this
-difference that, instead of feeling directly responsible for a village
-of humble folk, he should come to feel responsible for all the toilers
-of the “Fatherland” and for the international results of the German
-army. Let us imagine that in his self-surrender to the humblest of his
-people, there would gradually grow up in his subconsciousness, forces
-more ideal than any which had possessed him before; that his interests
-and thoughts would gradually shift from war and the manœuvres and
-extensions of the army, to the unceasing toil, the permanent patience,
-which lie at the bottom of all national existence; that the life of
-the common people, which is so infinite in its moral suggestiveness,
-would open up to him new moral regions, would stir new energies within
-him, until there would take place one of those strange alterations in
-personality of which hundreds of examples are recorded.<span class="pagenum" id="Page_226">[Pg 226]</span> Under a glow
-of generous indignation, magnanimity, loyalty to his people, a passion
-of self-surrender to his new ideals, we can imagine that the imperial
-temperament would waste no time in pinings and regret, but that, his
-energies being enlisted in an overmastering desire to free the people
-from the burden of the army, he would drive vigorously in the direction
-of his new ideals. It is impossible to imagine him “passive” under this
-conversion to the newer ideals of peace. He would no more be passive
-than St. Paul was after his conversion. He would regard the four
-million men in Europe shut up in barracks, fed in idleness by toiling
-peasants, as an actual wrong and oppression. They would all have to
-be freed and returned to normal life and occupation—not through the
-comparatively easy method of storming garrisons, in which he has had
-training, but through conviction on the part of rulers and people of
-the wrong and folly of barrack idleness and military glitter. The
-freeing of the Christians from the oppressions of the Turks, of the
-Spaniards from the Moslems, could offer no more strenuous task—always,
-however, with the added difficulty and complication that the change
-in the people must be a moral change analogous to the one which had
-already taken place within himself; that he must be debarred<span class="pagenum" id="Page_227">[Pg 227]</span> from
-the use of weapons, to which his earlier life had made him familiar;
-that his high task, while enormous in its proportion, was still most
-delicate in its character, and must be undertaken without the guarantee
-of precedent, and without any surety of success. “Smitten with the
-great vision of social righteousness,” as so many of his contemporaries
-have been, he could not permit himself to be blinded or to take refuge
-in glittering generalities, but, even as St. Paul arose from his vision
-and went on his way in a new determination never again changed, so he
-would have to go forth to a mission, imperial indeed in its magnitude,
-but “over-imperial” in the sweep of its consequences and in the
-difficulty of its accomplishment.</p>
-
-<p>Certainly counting all the hours of the Emperor’s life spent in camp
-and court dominated by military pomp and ambition, he has given more
-than ten years to military environment and much less than ten years
-to the bulk of his people, and it would not be impossible to imagine
-such a conversion due to the reaction of environment and interest.
-Such a change having taken place, should we hold him royal in temper
-or worthy of the traditions of knight-errantry, if he were held back
-by commercial considerations, if he hesitated because the Krupp
-Company could sell no more guns and would be thrown out of business?
-We should<span class="pagenum" id="Page_228">[Pg 228]</span> say to this Emperor whom our imaginations have evoked,
-Were your enthusiasms genuine enough, were your insights absolutely
-true, you would see of how little consequence these things really
-are, and how easily adjusted. Let the Krupp factories, with their
-tremendous resources in machinery and men, proceed to manufacture
-dredging machines for the reclaiming of the waste land in Posen; let
-them make new inventions to relieve the drudgery of the peasant,
-agricultural implements adequate to Germany’s agricultural resources
-and possibilities. They will find need for all the power of invention
-which they can command, all the manufacturing and commercial ability
-which they now employ. It is part of your new vocation to adjust the
-industries now tributary to the standing armies and organization
-of warfare, to useful and beneficent occupations; to transform and
-readjust all their dependent industries, from the manufacturing of
-cannon and war-ships to that of gold braid and epaulets. It is your
-mission to revive and increase agriculture, industry, and commerce,
-by diverting all the energy which is now directed to the feeding,
-clothing, and arming of the idle, into the legitimate and normal
-channels of life.</p>
-
-<p>It is certainly not more difficult to imagine such a change occurring
-to an entire people than in the<span class="pagenum" id="Page_229">[Pg 229]</span> mind and purpose of one man—in fact,
-such changes are going on all about us.</p>
-
-<p>The advance of constructive labor and the subsidence and disappearance
-of destructive warfare is a genuine line of progression. One sees much
-of protection and something of construction in the office of war, as
-the Roman bridges survived throughout Europe long after the legions
-which built them and crossed them for new conquests had passed out of
-mind. Also, in the rising tide of labor there is a large admixture of
-warfare, of the purely militant spirit which is sometimes so dominant
-that it throws the entire movement into confusion and leads the laborer
-to renounce his birthright; but nevertheless the desire for battle is
-becoming constantly more restricted in area. It still sways in regions
-where men of untamed blood are dwelling, and among men who, because
-they regard themselves as a superior race, imagine that they are free
-from the ordinary moral restraints; but its territory constantly
-grows smaller and its manifestations more guarded. Doubtless war will
-exist for many generations among semi-savage tribes, and it will also
-break out in those nations which may be roused and dominated by the
-unrestricted commercial spirit; but the ordinary life of man will go<span class="pagenum" id="Page_230">[Pg 230]</span>
-on without it, as it becomes transmitted into a desire for normal human
-relationship.</p>
-
-<p>It is difficult to predict at what moment the conviction that war is
-foolish or wasteful or unjustifiable may descend upon the earth, and
-it is also impossible to estimate among how many groups of people this
-conviction has already become established.</p>
-
-<p>The Doukhobors are a religious sect in Russia whose creed emphasizes
-the teaching of non-resistance. A story is told of one of their young
-men who, because of his refusal to enter the Russian army, was brought
-for trial before a judge, who reasoned with him concerning the folly
-of his course and in return received a homily upon the teachings of
-Jesus. “Quite right you are,” answered the judge, “from the point of
-abstract virtue, but the time has not yet come to put into practise the
-literal sayings of Christ.” “The time may not have come for you, your
-Honor,” was the reply, “but the time has come for us.” Who can tell at
-what hour vast numbers of Russian peasants upon those Russian steppes
-will decide that the time has come for them to renounce warfare, even
-as their prototype, the mujik, Count Tolstoy, has already decided that
-it has come for him? Conscious as the peasants are of religious motive,
-they will<span class="pagenum" id="Page_231">[Pg 231]</span> meet a cheerful martyrdom for their convictions, as so many
-of the Doukhobors have done. It may, however, be easy to overestimate
-this changed temper because of the simple yet dramatic formulation
-given by Tolstoy to the non-resisting spirit. How far Tolstoy is really
-the mouthpiece of a great moral change going on in the life of the
-Russian peasant and how far he speaks merely for himself, it is, of
-course, impossible to state. If only a few peasants are experiencing
-this change, his genius has certainly done much to make their position
-definite. The man who assumes that a new degree of virtue is possible,
-thereby makes it real and tangible to those who long to possess it but
-lack courage. Tolstoy at least is ready to predict that in the great
-affairs of national disarmament, it may easily be true that the Russian
-peasants will take the first steps.</p>
-
-<p>Their armed rebellion may easily be overcome by armed troops, but what
-can be done with their permanent patience, their insatiable hunger
-for holiness? All idealism has its prudential aspects, and, as has
-been pointed out by Mr. Perris,<a id="FNanchor_17" href="#Footnote_17" class="fnanchor">[17]</a> no other form of revolution is so
-fitted to an agricultural people as this continued outburst of passive
-resistance among whole communities, not<span class="pagenum" id="Page_232">[Pg 232]</span> in theory, but in practise.
-This peasant movement goes on in spite of persecution, perfectly
-spontaneous, self-reliant, colossal in the silent confidence and power
-of endurance. In this day of Maxim guns and high explosives, the old
-method of revolt would be impossible to an agricultural people, but
-the non-resistant strike against military service lies directly in
-line with the temperament and capacity of the Russian people. That
-“the government cannot put the whole population in prison, and, if it
-could, it would still be without material for an army, and without
-money for its support,” is an almost irrefutable argument. We see here,
-at least, the beginnings of a sentiment that shall, if sufficiently
-developed, make war impossible to an entire people, a conviction of sin
-manifesting itself throughout a nation.</p>
-
-<p>Whatever may have been true of the revolutionist of the past when
-his spike was on a certain level of equality with the bayonet of
-the regular soldier, and his enthusiasm and daring could, in large
-measure, overcome the difference, it is certainly true now that
-such simple arms as a revolutionist could command, would be utterly
-futile against the equipment of the regular soldier. To continue the
-use of armed force means, under these circumstances, that we must
-refer the possibilities<span class="pagenum" id="Page_233">[Pg 233]</span> of all social and industrial advance to the
-consent of the owners of the Maxim guns. We must deny to the humble
-the possibility of the initiation of progressive movements employing
-revolution or, at least, we must defer all advance until the humble
-many can persuade the powerful few of the righteousness of their cause,
-and we must throw out the working class from participation in the
-beginnings of social revolutions. Tolstoy would make non-resistance
-aggressive. He would carry over into the reservoirs of moral influence
-all the strength which is now spent in coercion and resistance. It
-is an experiment which in its fullness has never been tried in human
-history, and it is worthy of a genius. As moral influence has ever a
-larger place in individual relationship and as physical force becomes
-daily more restricted in area, so Tolstoy would “speed up” the process
-in collective relationships and reset the whole of international life
-upon the basis of good will and intelligent understanding. It does not
-matter that he has entered these new moral fields through the narrow
-gateway of personal experience; that he sets forth his convictions with
-the limitations of the Russian governmental environment; that he is
-regarded at this moment by the Russian revolutionists as a quietist and
-reactionary. He has nevertheless reached down<span class="pagenum" id="Page_234">[Pg 234]</span> into the moral life of
-the humble people and formulated for them as for us the secret of their
-long patience and unremitting labor. Therefore, in the teachings of
-Tolstoy, as in the life of the peasants, coextensive with the doctrine
-of non-resistance, stress is laid upon productive labor. The peasant
-Bandereff, from whom Tolstoy claims to have learned much, has not only
-proclaimed himself as against war, but has written a marvelous book
-entitled “Bread Labor,” expressing once more the striking antithesis,
-the eternal contrast between war and labor, and between those who abhor
-the one and ever advocate the other.</p>
-
-<p>War on the one hand—plain destruction, Von Moltke called
-it—represents the life of the garrison and the tax-gatherer, the Roman
-emperor and his degenerate people, living upon the fruits of their
-conquest. Labor, on the other hand, represents productive effort,
-holding carefully what has been garnered by the output of brain and
-muscle, guarding the harvest jealously because it is the precious bread
-men live by.</p>
-
-<p>It is quite possible that we have committed the time-honored folly of
-looking for a sudden change in men’s attitude toward war, even as the
-poor alchemists wasted their lives in searching for a magic fluid and
-did nothing to discover the great laws governing chemical changes and
-reactions,<span class="pagenum" id="Page_235">[Pg 235]</span> the knowledge of which would have developed untold wealth
-beyond their crude dreams of transmuted gold.</p>
-
-<p>The final moral reaction may at last come, accompanied by deep remorse,
-too tardy to reclaim all the human life which has been spent and the
-treasure which has been wasted, or it may come with a great sense of
-joy that all voluntary destruction of human life, all the deliberate
-wasting of the fruits of labor, have become a thing of the past, and
-that whatever the future contains for us, it will at least be free
-from war. We may at last comprehend the truth of that which Ruskin has
-stated so many times, that we worship the soldier, not because he goes
-forth to slay, but to be slain.</p>
-
-<p>That this world peace movement should be arising from the humblest
-without the sanction and in some cases with the explicit indifference,
-of the church founded by the Prince of Peace, is simply another example
-of the strange paths of moral evolution.</p>
-
-<p>To some of us it seems clear that marked manifestations of this
-movement are found in the immigrant quarters of American cities. The
-previous survey of the immigrant situation would indicate that all the
-peoples of the world have become part of the American tribunal, and
-that their<span class="pagenum" id="Page_236">[Pg 236]</span> sense of pity, their clamor for personal kindness, their
-insistence upon the right to join in our progress, can no longer be
-disregarded. The burdens and sorrows of men have unexpectedly become
-intelligent and urgent to this nation, and it is only by accepting
-them with some magnanimity that we can develop the larger sense of
-justice which is becoming world-wide and is lying in ambush, as it
-were, to manifest itself in governmental relations. Men of all nations
-are determining upon the abolition of degrading poverty, disease, and
-intellectual weakness, with their resulting industrial inefficiency,
-and are making a determined effort to conserve even the feeblest
-citizen to the State. To join in this determined effort is to break
-through national bonds and to unlock the latent fellowship between man
-and man. In a political campaign men will go through every possible
-hardship in response to certain political loyalties; in a moment of
-national danger men will sacrifice every personal advantage. It is but
-necessary to make this fellowship wider, to extend its scope without
-lowering its intensity. Those emotions which stir the spirit to deeds
-of self-surrender and to high enthusiasm, are among the world’s most
-precious assets. That this emotion has so often become associated with
-war, by no means proves that it cannot be used for other ends.<span class="pagenum" id="Page_237">[Pg 237]</span> There
-is something active and tangible in this new internationalism, although
-it is difficult to make it clear, and in our striving for a new word
-with which to express this new and important sentiment, we are driven
-to the rather absurd phrase of “cosmic patriotism.” Whatever it may
-be called, it may yet be strong enough to move masses of men out of
-their narrow national considerations and cautions into new reaches of
-human effort and affection. Religion has long ago taught that only
-as the individual can establish a sense of union with a power for
-righteousness not himself, can he experience peace; and it may be
-possible that the nations will be called to a similar experience.</p>
-
-<p>The International Peace Conference held in Boston in 1904 was opened
-by a huge meeting in which men of influence and modern thought from
-four continents, gave reasons for their belief in the passing of
-war. But none was so modern, so fundamental and so trenchant, as the
-address which was read from the prophet Isaiah. He founded the cause
-of peace upon the cause of righteousness, not only as expressed in
-political relations, but also in industrial relations. He contended
-that peace could be secured only as men abstained from the gains of
-oppression and responded to the cause of the poor; that swords<span class="pagenum" id="Page_238">[Pg 238]</span> would
-finally be beaten into plowshares and pruning-hooks, not because men
-resolved to be peaceful, but because all the metal of the earth would
-be turned to its proper use when the poor and their children should be
-abundantly fed. It was as if the ancient prophet foresaw that under
-an enlightened industrialism peace would no longer be an absence of
-war, but the unfolding of world-wide processes making for the nurture
-of human life. He predicted the moment which has come to us now that
-peace is no longer an abstract dogma but has become a rising tide of
-moral enthusiasm slowly engulfing all pride of conquest and making war
-impossible.</p>
-
-
-<div class="footnotes"><h3>FOOTNOTES:</h3>
-
-<div class="footnote">
-
-<p><a id="Footnote_16" href="#FNanchor_16" class="label">[16]</a> Imperialism, by John A. Hobson. Page 128.</p>
-
-</div>
-
-<div class="footnote">
-
-<p><a id="Footnote_17" href="#FNanchor_17" class="label">[17]</a> The Grand Mujik, G. H. Perris.</p>
-
-</div>
-</div>
-
-
-<hr class="chap x-ebookmaker-drop">
-
-<div class="chapter">
-<h2 class="nobreak" id="INDEX">INDEX</h2>
-</div>
-
-
-<ul class="index">
-<li class="ifrst">Altruism, manifestations of, <a href="#Page_17">17</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">in politics, <a href="#Page_48">48</a>.</li>
-
-<li class="ifrst">Anglo-Saxon, temptation to govern all peoples alike, <a href="#Page_47">47</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">distrust of experiment, <a href="#Page_67">67</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">individualistic, <a href="#Page_68">68</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">attitude towards self-government, <a href="#Page_112">112</a>.</li>
-
-<li class="ifrst">Arbitration, change in attitude toward, <a href="#Page_133">133</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">in New Zealand, <a href="#Page_134">134</a>.</li>
-
-<li class="ifrst">Aristotle’s ideal of a city, <a href="#Page_92">92</a>.</li>
-
-<li class="ifrst">Assimilation, limit to United States power of, <a href="#Page_39">39</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">workingman’s attitude toward, <a href="#Page_94">94</a>, <a href="#Page_117">117</a>.</li>
-</ul>
-<ul class="index">
-<li class="ifrst">Bandereff, <a href="#Page_234">234</a>.</li>
-
-<li class="ifrst">Bentham, <a href="#Page_23">23</a>.</li>
-
-<li class="ifrst">Bloch, Jean de, <a href="#Page_4">4</a>.</li>
-
-<li class="ifrst">Booth, Charles, maps of London, <a href="#Page_86">86</a>.</li>
-
-<li class="ifrst">Bosanquet, Mrs. Bernard, <a href="#Page_116">116</a>.</li>
-
-<li class="ifrst">Buckle, <a href="#Page_23">23</a>.</li>
-
-<li class="ifrst">Burns, John, <a href="#Page_125">125</a>.</li>
-</ul>
-<ul class="index">
-<li class="ifrst">Charity, organization of in New York, <a href="#Page_74">74</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">modern, democratic and constructive, <a href="#Page_79">79</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">extension of, <a href="#Page_84">84</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">and unskilled labor, <a href="#Page_152">152</a>.</li>
-
-<li class="ifrst">Chicago Municipal Lodging House, <a href="#Page_157">157</a>.</li>
-
-<li class="ifrst">Chicago Federation of Labor, <a href="#Page_130">130</a>, <a href="#Page_131">131</a>.</li>
-
-<li class="ifrst">Chicago Stock Yards Strike, power of unions for amalgamation shown in, <a href="#Page_96">96</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">object of, <a href="#Page_101">101</a>, <a href="#Page_111">111</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">use of referendum vote in, <a href="#Page_103">103</a>, <a href="#Page_108">108</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">good order of, <a href="#Page_104">104</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">paradoxes shown by, <a href="#Page_104">104</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">example of national appeal subordinated to union, <a href="#Page_106">106</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">strike-breaker in, <a href="#Page_106">106</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">Greek in, <a href="#Page_109">109</a>.</li>
-
-<li class="ifrst">Child Labor, social waste of, <a href="#Page_28">28</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">a national problem, <a href="#Page_107">107</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">industrial value of, <a href="#Page_154">154</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">responsibility of State, <a href="#Page_156">156</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">effect of sub-divided, <a href="#Page_158">158</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">effect of premature, <a href="#Page_159">159</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">effect on parents, <a href="#Page_161">161</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">effect on product, <a href="#Page_162">162</a>.</li>
-
-<li class="ifrst">Child Labor Legislation, makes for better citizens, <a href="#Page_73">73</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">immigrant parents and, <a href="#Page_74">74</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">uniform, <a href="#Page_168">168</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">leisure gained for play, <a href="#Page_169">169</a>.</li>
-
-<li class="ifrst">Commerce, international, <a href="#Page_115">115</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">modern representative of conquest, <a href="#Page_116">116</a>.</li>
-
-<li class="ifrst">Comte, Augustus, <a href="#Page_217">217</a>.</li>
-
-<li class="ifrst">Constitution of the U. S., and the immigrant, <a href="#Page_42">42</a>, <a href="#Page_43">43</a>, <a href="#Page_72">72</a>, <a href="#Page_73">73</a>.</li>
-
-<li class="ifrst">Contempt, social results of, <a href="#Page_51">51</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">in industrialism, <a href="#Page_116">116</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">for immigrant, <a href="#Page_151">151</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">for primitive arts, <a href="#Page_202">202</a>.</li>
-
-<li class="ifrst">Cosmopolitan city, beginnings of newer ideals of peace found in, <a href="#Page_11">11</a>, <a href="#Page_13">13</a>, <a href="#Page_18">18</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">centers of radicalism, <a href="#Page_16">16</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">bond of union in, <a href="#Page_17">17</a>, <a href="#Page_204">204</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">difficulties due to size of, <a href="#Page_86">86</a>, <a href="#Page_216">216</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">subtle problems of, <a href="#Page_206">206</a>.</li>
-
-<li class="ifrst">Cosmopolitan standard, lack of, <a href="#Page_78">78</a>.</li>
-</ul>
-<ul class="index">
-<li class="ifrst">Dante, <a href="#Page_21">21</a>.</li>
-
-<li class="ifrst">Democratic government, causes of failure of, <a href="#Page_47">47</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">arousing enthusiasm for, <a href="#Page_63">63</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">result of moral effort, <a href="#Page_75">75</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">inherited form of, <a href="#Page_121">121</a>.</li>
-
-<li class="ifrst">Democracy, modified slowly, <a href="#Page_37">37</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">repressive legislation in, <a href="#Page_52">52</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">lack of civic expression for, <a href="#Page_59">59</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">failure to apprehend, <a href="#Page_91">91</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">effects of commercialism on, <a href="#Page_222">222</a>.</li>
-
-<li class="ifrst">Denver Juvenile Court, <a href="#Page_81">81</a>.</li>
-
-<li class="ifrst">Doctrinaire method, weakness of, <a href="#Page_31">31</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">conditions settled by, <a href="#Page_53">53</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">unattached to experience, <a href="#Page_72">72</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">not fitted to modern patriotism, <a href="#Page_74">74</a>.</li>
-
-<li class="ifrst">Domestic service, <a href="#Page_51">51</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">a review of the history of, <a href="#Page_199">199</a>.</li>
-
-<li class="ifrst">Doukhobors, situation in Canada, <a href="#Page_67">67</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">emphasize non-resistance, <a href="#Page_230">230</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">meet martyrdom, <a href="#Page_231">231</a>.</li>
-</ul>
-<ul class="index">
-<li class="ifrst">Education, related to industrial efficiency, <a href="#Page_16">16</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">belief in, as social remedy, <a href="#Page_21">21</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">of vital importance to city, <a href="#Page_73">73</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">compulsory, <a href="#Page_74">74</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">advanced and reform schools, <a href="#Page_82">82</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">passion in America, <a href="#Page_85">85</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">distinctive achievement in America, <a href="#Page_166">166</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">for factory children, <a href="#Page_167">167</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">less expensive than repression, <a href="#Page_175">175</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">already democratized, <a href="#Page_178">178</a>.</li>
-
-<li class="ifrst">Educators, recognizing industrialism, <a href="#Page_169">169</a>.</li>
-
-<li class="ifrst">Eighteenth-century philosophy, abandonment of, required, <a href="#Page_28">28</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">inadequacy of, <a href="#Page_31">31</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">responsible for immigration, <a href="#Page_40">40</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">belief in universal franchise, <a href="#Page_42">42</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">ideal man of, <a href="#Page_60">60</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">ideals still influence statesman, <a href="#Page_70">70</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">retained in America, <a href="#Page_91">91</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">formula of equality, <a href="#Page_117">117</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">radicalism of, <a href="#Page_121">121</a>.</li>
-
-<li class="ifrst">Employer, prone to attack new union, <a href="#Page_129">129</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">charges against unions, <a href="#Page_135">135</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">attitude toward business relations with unions, <a href="#Page_138">138</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">traditions in household, <a href="#Page_201">201</a>.</li>
-
-<li class="ifrst">England, labor laws of, <a href="#Page_152">152</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">debasement of products of, <a href="#Page_166">166</a>.</li>
-</ul>
-<ul class="index">
-<li class="ifrst">Franchise, <a href="#Page_38">38</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">universal panacea, <a href="#Page_42">42</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">universal franchise, <a href="#Page_52">52</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">beginnings of municipal, <a href="#Page_180">180</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">military test absurd, <a href="#Page_182">182</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">why women should have, <a href="#Page_192">192</a>.</li>
-
-<li class="ifrst">Factory system, <a href="#Page_163">163</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">worst evils of, <a href="#Page_149">149</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">uneducational, <a href="#Page_173">173</a>.</li>
-</ul>
-<ul class="index">
-<li class="ifrst">Gang, almost tribal in organization, <a href="#Page_176">176</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">political training in, <a href="#Page_177">177</a>.</li>
-
-<li class="ifrst">German Emperor, <a href="#Page_224">224</a>.</li>
-
-<li class="ifrst">Germany, government deals with needs of workingman, <a href="#Page_88">88</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">police socialized in, <a href="#Page_89">89</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">not afraid to extend municipal functions, <a href="#Page_91">91</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">economic protection in, <a href="#Page_122">122</a>, <a href="#Page_152">152</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">opposition to militarism in, <a href="#Page_165">165</a>.</li>
-
-<li class="ifrst">Golden, State Reform State School, <a href="#Page_81">81</a>.</li>
-
-<li class="ifrst">Government, newer manifestations of, <a href="#Page_15">15</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">away from the life of the people, <a href="#Page_35">35</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">oppressive, dependent on the sword, <a href="#Page_36">36</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">opposition to, formerly patriotism, <a href="#Page_42">42</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">dealing with naturalization, <a href="#Page_42">42</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">test not current, <a href="#Page_47">47</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">concern for the young incorporated in, <a href="#Page_80">80</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">fear of extending functions, <a href="#Page_84">84</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">traditional activities meagre, <a href="#Page_87">87</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">non-interference in industry, <a href="#Page_90">90</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">functions of, <a href="#Page_101">101</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">patriotic citizens forced to ignore, <a href="#Page_112">112</a>.</li>
-</ul>
-<ul class="index">
-<li class="ifrst">Hague tribunal, <a href="#Page_5">5</a>.</li>
-
-<li class="ifrst">Hebrew alliance, <a href="#Page_74">74</a>.</li>
-
-<li class="ifrst">Heroism, new, <a href="#Page_25">25</a>, <a href="#Page_218">218</a>.</li>
-
-<li class="ifrst">Historic method, <a href="#Page_31">31</a>, <a href="#Page_63">63</a>.</li>
-
-<li class="ifrst">Hobhouse, L. T., <a href="#Page_6">6</a>.</li>
-
-<li class="ifrst">Hobson, John A., <a href="#Page_221">221</a>.</li>
-
-<li class="ifrst">Household labor, conference at Lake Placid, <a href="#Page_198">198</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">history of, in America, <a href="#Page_199">199</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">causes of paucity of, <a href="#Page_200">200</a>.</li>
-
-<li class="ifrst">Hull-House, experiences, <a href="#Page_50">50</a>, <a href="#Page_58">58</a>, <a href="#Page_77">77</a>, <a href="#Page_82">82</a>, <a href="#Page_91">91</a>, <a href="#Page_119">119</a>, <a href="#Page_143">143</a>, <a href="#Page_159">159</a>, <a href="#Page_194">194</a>, <a href="#Page_203">203</a>, <a href="#Page_204">204</a>.</li>
-
-<li class="ifrst">Humanitarianism, in immigrant quarters, <a href="#Page_15">15</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">aggressive, <a href="#Page_26">26</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">scientific method applied to, <a href="#Page_28">28</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">cosmopolitan, <a href="#Page_76">76</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">present stage of, <a href="#Page_79">79</a>, <a href="#Page_99">99</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">its relation to labor power, <a href="#Page_165">165</a>.</li>
-</ul>
-<ul class="index">
-<li class="ifrst">Idealism, provincial aspects of, <a href="#Page_231">231</a>.</li>
-
-<li class="ifrst">Immigrants, emotional sentiment among, <a href="#Page_13">13</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">unusual power of association among, <a href="#Page_14">14</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">franchise extended to, <a href="#Page_38">38</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">philosophy in regard to, <a href="#Page_41">41</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">exploitation of, <a href="#Page_42">42</a>, <a href="#Page_45">45</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">evasion of immigration laws by, <a href="#Page_47">47</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">contempt for, <a href="#Page_49">49</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">charm and historical association among, <a href="#Page_64">64</a>, <a href="#Page_70">70</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">ignoring past experience of, <a href="#Page_65">65</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">beginnings of self-government among, <a href="#Page_71">71</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">relations of politician to, <a href="#Page_72">72</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">attempts to teach patriotism to, <a href="#Page_75">75</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">revelation of social customs among, <a href="#Page_79">79</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">standardizing by workmen, <a href="#Page_93">93</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">difficulties largely industrial, <a href="#Page_94">94</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">as wage lowering weapon, <a href="#Page_97">97</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">standard of living for, <a href="#Page_102">102</a>, <a href="#Page_116">116</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">claim on charitable funds, <a href="#Page_152">152</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">present contrasted with youthful condition of, <a href="#Page_161">161</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">early industries among, <a href="#Page_203">203</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">historic backgrounds of, <a href="#Page_205">205</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">manifestations of peace movement among, <a href="#Page_235">235</a>.</li>
-
-<li class="ifrst">Immigration, decreased by industrial depression, <a href="#Page_44">44</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">of recent years, <a href="#Page_200">200</a>.</li>
-
-<li class="ifrst">Industrialism, <a href="#Page_15">15</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">versus militarism, <a href="#Page_28">28</a>, <a href="#Page_220">220</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">significance of primitive arts in relation to, <a href="#Page_64">64</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">idealism in, <a href="#Page_95">95</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">as basis for legislation, <a href="#Page_121">121</a>.</li>
-
-<li class="ifrst">Industrial interests, in contemporary life, <a href="#Page_42">42</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">and the immigrant, <a href="#Page_71">71</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">germane to government, <a href="#Page_122">122</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">and international peace, <a href="#Page_113">113</a>.</li>
-
-<li class="ifrst">Industrial development, changes in, <a href="#Page_124">124</a>.</li>
-
-<li class="ifrst">Illiterate children in the U. S., <a href="#Page_163">163</a>.</li>
-
-<li class="ifrst">Internationalism, <a href="#Page_23">23</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">socialism based on, <a href="#Page_114">114</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">Mazzini’s address on, <a href="#Page_115">115</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">active and tangible, <a href="#Page_237">237</a>.</li>
-
-<li class="ifrst">International Peace Conference in Boston, <a href="#Page_237">237</a>.</li>
-
-<li class="ifrst">Interparliamentary union for international arbitration, <a href="#Page_6">6</a>.</li>
-
-<li class="ifrst">Institute of International Law, <a href="#Page_6">6</a>.</li>
-</ul>
-<ul class="index">
-<li class="ifrst">James, William, <a href="#Page_24">24</a>.</li>
-
-<li class="ifrst">Jefferson, Thomas, <a href="#Page_31">31</a>.</li>
-
-<li class="ifrst">Justice, the larger, <a href="#Page_236">236</a>.</li>
-
-<li class="ifrst">Juvenile Courts, <a href="#Page_80">80</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">Denver, <a href="#Page_81">81</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">parental attitude of, <a href="#Page_82">82</a>.</li>
-</ul>
-<ul class="index">
-<li class="ifrst">Kant, <a href="#Page_23">23</a>.</li>
-
-<li class="ifrst">Kelley, Mrs. Florence, <a href="#Page_153">153</a>.</li>
-</ul>
-<ul class="index">
-<li class="ifrst">Lecky, <a href="#Page_222">222</a>.</li>
-
-<li class="ifrst">London, Charles Booth, maps of, <a href="#Page_87">87</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">government of, <a href="#Page_88">88</a>.</li>
-</ul>
-<ul class="index">
-<li class="ifrst">Machinery and the industrial situation, <a href="#Page_149">149</a>.</li>
-
-<li class="ifrst">Mazzini, <a href="#Page_29">29</a>, <a href="#Page_115">115</a>.</li>
-
-<li class="ifrst">Militarism, versus industrialism, <a href="#Page_28">28</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">police department a survival of, <a href="#Page_55">55</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">mediaeval city founded on, <a href="#Page_207">207</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">negative results of, <a href="#Page_220">220</a>.</li>
-
-<li class="ifrst">Mitchell, John, <a href="#Page_126">126</a>, <a href="#Page_146">146</a>.</li>
-
-<li class="ifrst">Morality, class, <a href="#Page_27">27</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">group, <a href="#Page_124">124</a>, <a href="#Page_145">145</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">antiquated codes of, <a href="#Page_210">210</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">village standards of, <a href="#Page_215">215</a>.</li>
-
-<li class="ifrst">Morley, John, <a href="#Page_118">118</a>.</li>
-
-<li class="ifrst">Morris, William, <a href="#Page_203">203</a>.</li>
-
-<li class="ifrst">Municipal government, admitted failure of, <a href="#Page_31">31</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">full of survivals, <a href="#Page_34">34</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">two points of rapid development in, <a href="#Page_79">79</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">ignores interests of average citizen, <a href="#Page_85">85</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">failure to provide playgrounds, <a href="#Page_176">176</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">indifference of citizens to, <a href="#Page_183">183</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">woman’s traditional activities in, <a href="#Page_184">184</a>.</li>
-</ul>
-<ul class="index">
-<li class="ifrst">Naturalization, <a href="#Page_42">42</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">rests on laws of 1802, <a href="#Page_43">43</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">brokerage in papers of, <a href="#Page_46">46</a>, <a href="#Page_71">71</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">test not contemporaneous, <a href="#Page_42">42</a>.</li>
-
-<li class="ifrst">Non-resistance, a misleading word, <a href="#Page_8">8</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">non-resistance strike, <a href="#Page_232">232</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">aggressive, <a href="#Page_233">233</a>.</li>
-</ul>
-<ul class="index">
-<li class="ifrst">Patriotism, belief that war engenders, <a href="#Page_18">18</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">a newer, arising, <a href="#Page_19">19</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">founded on sacrifice, <a href="#Page_74">74</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">taught too formally, <a href="#Page_75">75</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">primitive core of, <a href="#Page_91">91</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">founded on war, <a href="#Page_140">140</a>, <a href="#Page_217">217</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">bound in trappings of the past, <a href="#Page_214">214</a>.</li>
-
-<li class="ifrst">Peace, dynamic versus dogmatic, <a href="#Page_7">7</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">predicted by Isaiah, <a href="#Page_237">237</a>.</li>
-
-<li class="ifrst">Perris, G. H., <a href="#Page_231">231</a>.</li>
-
-<li class="ifrst">Play, a social stimulus, <a href="#Page_171">171</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">develops self-government and discipline, <a href="#Page_173">173</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">attitude of enlightened city government to, <a href="#Page_178">178</a>.</li>
-
-<li class="ifrst">Politician, professional, produced by mechanical government, <a href="#Page_52">52</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">friend of the vicious, <a href="#Page_56">56</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">appeals to human sentiment, <a href="#Page_59">59</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">first friend of immigrant, <a href="#Page_72">72</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">understands people’s hopes, <a href="#Page_79">79</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">attempts to control strike, <a href="#Page_103">103</a>.</li>
-
-<li class="ifrst">Protective legislation, aggressive aspect of the newer humanitarianism, <a href="#Page_28">28</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">U. S. deficient in, <a href="#Page_152">152</a>.</li>
-</ul>
-<ul class="index">
-<li class="ifrst">Reformer, contemptuous attitude of, <a href="#Page_49">49</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">sweeping condemnations of, <a href="#Page_57">57</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">alliance with business interests of, <a href="#Page_61">61</a>.</li>
-
-<li class="ifrst">Revolutionary War, <a href="#Page_36">36</a>, <a href="#Page_37">37</a>.</li>
-
-<li class="ifrst">Revolutionist, <a href="#Page_232">232</a>.</li>
-
-<li class="ifrst">Repressive legislation, <a href="#Page_54">54</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">human element in, <a href="#Page_55">55</a>.</li>
-
-<li class="ifrst">Royce, Josiah, <a href="#Page_32">32</a>.</li>
-
-<li class="ifrst">Ruskin, <a href="#Page_235">235</a>.</li>
-
-<li class="ifrst">Russia, <a href="#Page_68">68</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">the mir, <a href="#Page_67">67</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">attitude toward workmen, <a href="#Page_122">122</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">the army of, <a href="#Page_230">230</a>.</li>
-</ul>
-<ul class="index">
-<li class="ifrst">Self-government, difficulties and blunders of, <a href="#Page_32">32</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">crux of local, <a href="#Page_35">35</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">skepticism for ideals of, <a href="#Page_39">39</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">must deal with unsuccessful, <a href="#Page_62">62</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">scope of, <a href="#Page_63">63</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">forms of democracy for, <a href="#Page_88">88</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">immigrants’ first lesson in, <a href="#Page_95">95</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">clearly not yet attained, <a href="#Page_108">108</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">popular government oppressor of, <a href="#Page_104">104</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">might profit by industrial experience, <a href="#Page_121">121</a>.</li>
-
-<li class="ifrst">Shakespeare, <a href="#Page_9">9</a>.</li>
-
-<li class="ifrst">Social, evolution, <a href="#Page_211">211</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">morality in, <a href="#Page_213">213</a>.</li>
-
-<li class="ifrst">Socialism, based on internationalism and industrialism, <a href="#Page_114">114</a>.</li>
-
-<li class="ifrst">Socialist’s attitude to present government, <a href="#Page_86">86</a>.</li>
-
-<li class="ifrst">St. Francis, <a href="#Page_21">21</a>.</li>
-</ul>
-<ul class="index">
-<li class="ifrst">Teamsters’ strike, war element in, <a href="#Page_132">132</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">employers’ position as to arbitration in, <a href="#Page_134">134</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">alliance between employers’ and unionists’ offices in, <a href="#Page_135">135</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">inexperience of merchant employers in, <a href="#Page_136">136</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">social results of, <a href="#Page_141">141</a>.</li>
-
-<li class="ifrst">Tolstoy, <a href="#Page_3">3</a>, <a href="#Page_4">4</a>, <a href="#Page_209">209</a>, <a href="#Page_225">225</a>, <a href="#Page_230">230</a>, <a href="#Page_231">231</a>, <a href="#Page_233">233</a>, <a href="#Page_234">234</a>.</li>
-
-<li class="ifrst">Tribal law, <a href="#Page_11">11</a>.</li>
-
-<li class="ifrst">Tribal Morality, <a href="#Page_18">18</a>.</li>
-
-<li class="ifrst">Trades unions imitate city government, <a href="#Page_94">94</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">teach immigrants self-government, <a href="#Page_95">95</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">power for amalgamation of, <a href="#Page_97">97</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">attitude toward violence, <a href="#Page_98">98</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">causes for loss of sympathy for, in Stock Yards Strike, <a href="#Page_101">101</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">human appeal in, <a href="#Page_102">102</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">gratitude of immigrant toward, <a href="#Page_107">107</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">devotion to, might be turned to national life, <a href="#Page_118">118</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">organized by Russian government, <a href="#Page_122">122</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">contemporaneous movement difficult to judge, <a href="#Page_125">125</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">success not sole standard of, <a href="#Page_128">128</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">present a time of crisis for, <a href="#Page_129">129</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">attitude toward strike, <a href="#Page_130">130</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">social result of strike on, <a href="#Page_144">144</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">struggle for recognition, <a href="#Page_145">145</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">attitude toward improved machinery, <a href="#Page_148">148</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">uncomprehending victim of, <a href="#Page_195">195</a>.</li>
-</ul>
-<ul class="index">
-<li class="ifrst">War, defence of, <a href="#Page_26">26</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">prophecy of subsidence of, <a href="#Page_23">23</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">moral equivalent for, <a href="#Page_24">24</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">ideals in peace confusing, <a href="#Page_110">110</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">phraseology of new union, <a href="#Page_130">130</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">crime traceable to Spanish, <a href="#Page_143">143</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">new social problems not to be settled, <a href="#Page_206">206</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">attempts to justify by past records, <a href="#Page_210">210</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">substitutes for virtues of, <a href="#Page_217">217</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">contrast between labor and, <a href="#Page_234">234</a>.</li>
-
-<li class="ifrst">Warfare, cost of, <a href="#Page_4">4</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">customary method of settling labor disputes, <a href="#Page_135">135</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">recognition of good in, <a href="#Page_212">212</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">civilization substitutes law for, <a href="#Page_219">219</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">ideals of labor substituted for those of, <a href="#Page_224">224</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">disappearance of, <a href="#Page_229">229</a>.</li>
-
-<li class="ifrst">Webb, Mrs. Sidney, <a href="#Page_191">191</a>.</li>
-
-<li class="ifrst">Whitman, Walt, <a href="#Page_45">45</a>.</li>
-
-<li class="ifrst">Wilcox, Dr. Charles F., <a href="#Page_54">54</a>.</li>
-
-<li class="ifrst">Wilcox, Delos F., <a href="#Page_117">117</a>.</li>
-
-<li class="ifrst">Women, duty toward municipal government, <a href="#Page_28">28</a>, <a href="#Page_185">185</a>, <a href="#Page_208">208</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">conventions a snare to, <a href="#Page_186">186</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">franchise only for educated, <a href="#Page_188">188</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">effect of machinery on work of, <a href="#Page_190">190</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">increasing employment of, <a href="#Page_189">189</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">necessity for protection of working, <a href="#Page_191">191</a>, <a href="#Page_196">196</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">necessity for franchise for, <a href="#Page_191">191</a>, <a href="#Page_197">197</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">relation to clothing manufacture, <a href="#Page_192">192</a>;</li>
-<li class="isuba">lack in education of, <a href="#Page_197">197</a>, <a href="#Page_202">202</a>, <a href="#Page_206">206</a>.</li>
-</ul>
-<ul class="index">
-<li class="ifrst">Verestchagin, <a href="#Page_3">3</a>, <a href="#Page_4">4</a>.</li>
-
-<li class="ifrst">Von Moltke, <a href="#Page_234">234</a>.</li>
-</ul>
-
-
-<hr class="chap x-ebookmaker-drop">
-
-<div class="chapter">
-<h2><i>BY THE SAME AUTHOR</i></h2>
-
-
-<h3>DEMOCRACY AND SOCIAL ETHICS</h3>
-</div>
-
-<div class="blockquot">
-
-<p><b>By JANE ADDAMS</b>, Hull-House, Chicago. 9 + 281 pages, 12 mo.,
-cloth, leather back, $1.25 net. Citizen’s Library.</p>
-</div>
-
-
-<p>“Miss Addams is clear. She has not been precipitate in the preparation
-of her book. She has reconsidered, corrected, and recorrected it,
-spoken with temperance and courtesy.... As gentle, as patient, as
-sincere, and as astute as Jane Addams herself is the philosophy set
-forth in these pages.... The processes of Miss Addams’ thought are
-interesting to thousands. The sense that none of us is living up to
-the best idea of democracy is upon each of us.... Miss Addams is
-bound to receive a respectful hearing. As a leader who ever prays to
-lead aright, a sociologist who is willing to test her theories in a
-practical and personal way, a theorist who is not ashamed to own when
-she has been mistaken, a friend who will remain true to her friend no
-matter what may arise, and a person of leisure and power, who has the
-civic interest at heart, she has come to be prized as one of the chief
-of citizens.”—<i>Chicago Tribune.</i></p>
-
-<p>“Its pages are remarkably—we were about to say refreshingly—free
-from the customary academic limitations.... In fact, are the result
-of actual experience in hand to hand contact with social problems....
-No more truthful description, for example, of the political ‘boss’ as
-he thrives to-day in our great cities has ever been written than is
-contained in Miss Addams’ chapter on ‘Political Reform.’ The whole
-chapter will be accepted as a realistic picture of conditions as they
-are to-day in the city of Chicago. The same thing may be said of the
-other chapters of the book in regard to their presentation of social
-and economic facts.”—<i>Review of Reviews.</i></p>
-
-<p>“Too much emphasis cannot be laid upon the efficiency and inspiration
-afforded by these essays. ‘Charitable Effort,’ ‘Filial Affections,’
-‘Household Adjustment,’ ‘Industrial Amelioration,’ ‘Educational
-Methods,’ ‘Political Reform,’ are the topics treated in a masterly and
-revolutionary style. Miss Addams shatters some of our most cherished
-illusions upon the relations which should exist between the helper and
-the helped, between parent and child, mistress and maid, the members
-of a family, between the ‘boss’ and the community. She takes the
-subject entirely out of the realms of sentimentality, puts it upon
-a solid moral basis, and by a close and logical train of reasoning
-brings her conclusions home to the conscience and common sense of every
-member of the social structure. The book is startling, stimulating and
-intelligent.”—<i>Philadelphia Ledger.</i></p>
-
-
-<h3>The Arbiter in Council</h3>
-
-<p>A discussion of peace and war, in which take part, each from his own
-viewpoint, a lawyer “with a conscience,” a stock broker, a learned
-professor of history, a journalist, a retired admiral, an army officer,
-and two clergymen of widely differing forms of church government. The
-Arbiter is a veteran student of politics, a disciple of John Bright.</p>
-
-<div class="blockquot">
-
-<p>“As a summary of all that is to be said on the subject, thrown into
-readable form, the book is well done; ... almost no topic is left
-untouched.”—<i>Nation.</i></p>
-
-<p>“What strikes one in reading this book even more than its
-readableness, is the wide range of its information.... The points of
-view offered are many and diversified.... No argument worth using is
-left unused.”—<i>The Evening Mail.</i></p>
-
-<p>“The subjects discussed include the causes and consequences of war;
-modern warfare; private war and the duel; perpetual peace or the
-federation of the world; arbitration, the political economy of war,
-and Christianity and war. It is a notable book, or will become one as
-it is widely read.”—Editorial in <i>The Boston Herald</i>.</p>
-
-<p>“The Arbiter’s friends are drawn from several ranks in life, and
-they bring to the symposium wide reading in the literature of the
-subject, logical powers and a persuasive manner of speaking. ‘The
-Arbiter in Council’ may be regarded as a conspectus of the best
-thought on warfare, especially in relation to the topic of universal
-peace.”—<i>Philadelphia Press.</i></p>
-</div>
-
-
-<p>6 + 567 pages, 8’vo., cloth, $2.50 net.</p>
-
-
-<p>On many of the subjects touched upon in Miss Addams’s “The Newer Ideals
-of Peace” interesting material may be found in the volumes named
-below:—</p>
-
-
-<h3>ON CITY GOVERNMENT</h3>
-
-<p class="center">The American City</p>
-
-<p class="center">By DELOS F. WILCOX, Ph. D.</p>
-
-<div class="blockquot">
-
-<p>“In the ‘American City’ Dr. Wilcox ... has written a book that every
-thoughtful citizen should read. The problems of the street, the
-tenement, public utilities, civic education, the three deadly vices,
-municipal revenue and municipal debt, with all their related and
-subsidiary problems, are clearly and fully considered.”—<i>Pittsburgh
-Gazette.</i></p>
-</div>
-
-<p class="center">
-<b>6 + 423 pages, 12 mo., cloth, leather back, $1.25 net.</b><br>
-<i>Citizen’s Library.</i><br>
-</p>
-
-<h3>ON THE LABOR PROBLEM</h3>
-
-<p class="center">Labor Problems</p>
-
-<p class="center">By THOMAS SEWALL ADAMS, Ph. D., Assistant Professor of Political
-Economy, and HELEN L. SUMNER, Honorary Fellow in Political Economy,
-University of Wisconsin.</p>
-
-<div class="blockquot">
-
-<p>“A volume which has a labor-saving value for any library.... Here
-one finds upon each of the problems treated—woman and child labor,
-immigration, strikes and boycotts, labor organizations and employers’
-associations, the agencies of industrial peace, profit-sharing,
-co-operation, industrial education, labor laws, and the material
-progress of the wage-earning classes—the principal facts and comments
-of all the chief authorities ... with helpful bibliographical lists
-and references to volumes and chapters.”—<i>The Commons</i>, Chicago.</p>
-</div>
-
-<p class="center">
-<b>15 + 579 pages, cr. 8 vo., cloth, $1.60 net.</b><br>
-</p>
-
-
-<h3>ON INDUSTRIAL LEGISLATION</h3>
-
-<p class="center">Some Ethical Gains Through Legislation</p>
-
-<p class="center">By MRS. FLORENCE KELLEY.</p>
-
-<p>The book has grown out of the author’s experience as Chief Inspector of
-Factories in Illinois from 1893 to 1897, as Secretary of the National
-Consumers’ League from 1899 till now, and chiefly as a resident at
-Hull-House, and later at the Nurses’ Settlement, New York.</p>
-
-<div class="blockquot">
-
-<p>“Mrs. Kelley’s primary aim is to set forth the results achieved by
-the agitation and education of the past decade or so in certain
-social directions—in the recognition of the children’s right to
-childhood and to instruction and to opportunity, of the adult’s right
-to leisure, of woman’s right to the ballot, and of the purchaser’s
-right to genuine honest products. Her secondary aim is to show how
-much remains to be achieved, and what obstacles the friends of
-anti-child-labor legislation, eight-hour laws, pure food and correct
-label laws, woman suffrage and so on, have to surmount.”—<i>The
-Record-Herald</i>, Chicago.</p>
-</div>
-
-<p class="center">
-<b>Cloth, leather back, 341 pp., 12 mo., $1.25 net.</b> <i>Citizen’s Library.</i><br>
-</p>
-
-
-<div class="blockquot">
-
-<h3>ON SOME CONDITIONS OF CHILD LIFE</h3>
-</div>
-
-<p class="center">The Bitter Cry of the Children</p>
-
-<p class="center">By JOHN SPARGO, Author of “Socialism.”</p>
-
-<div class="blockquot">
-
-<p>“‘There have been many books written about the children of the poor,
-but none of them gives us so impressive a statement as is contained
-here of the most important and powerful cause of poverty.’ This
-prefatory judgment of Robert Hunter will be handed on by everyone
-who reads.... The book will live and set hundreds of teachers and
-social workers and philanthropists to work.... School teachers need
-this book, social workers, librarians, pastors, editors, all who want
-to understand the problem of poverty or education.”—<span class="smcap">William H.
-Allen</span> in <i>The Annals of the American Academy</i>.</p>
-</div>
-
-<p class="center">
-<b>16 + 257 pages, 12 mo., $1.25 net.</b><br>
-</p>
-
-
-<div class="blockquot">
-
-<h3>ON CONDITIONS AMONG THE POOR</h3>
-</div>
-
-<p class="center"><b>Poverty.</b> A Definition and an Estimate of its Extent</p>
-
-<p class="center">By ROBERT HUNTER, President of the Social Reform Club; Chairman of New
-York Child Labor Committee; formerly head worker of the University
-Settlement of New York.</p>
-
-<div class="blockquot">
-
-<p>“I cannot delay writing you of my profound interest in your new
-book, ‘Poverty,’ which I have to-day read, with instruction, with
-satisfaction, and with a deep sense of your mastery of the subject....
-Your chapter on ‘The Immigrant’ seems to me the most concise, the most
-convincing and the most logical brief statement of the subject that I
-have ever seen.”—<span class="smcap">Robert De C. Ward</span>, Harvard University.</p>
-</div>
-
-<p class="center">
-<b>9 + 382 pages, 12 mo., cloth, $1.50, net.</b><br>
-</p>
-
-
-<h3>A SOCIOLOGICAL SOURCE-BOOK</h3>
-
-<p class="center">Readings in Descriptive and Historical Sociology</p>
-
-<p>Edited by FRANKLIN H. GIDDINGS, Ph.D., LL.D., Professor of Sociology
-and the History of Civilization in Columbia University. The book
-is a selection of extracts from sources ranging from the Bible to
-yesterday’s newspaper, connected with a mere outline of theory. The
-book is at once a rounded outline of social theory, and a suggestive
-guide in the method of classifying the new materials constantly
-appearing in reviews and the daily press.</p>
-
-<p class="center">
-<b>24 + 553 pages, cloth, 12 mo., $1.60 net.</b><br>
-</p>
-
-
-<p class="center p2">
-<span class="big">THE MACMILLAN COMPANY</span><br>
-Publishers&#160; &#160; &#160; 64-66 Fifth Ave.&#160; &#160; &#160; New York<br>
-</p>
-<hr class="x-ebookmaker-drop chap">
-<div class="chapter transnote">
-
-<h2>Transcriber’s Notes</h2>
-
-<p>Errors in punctuation have been fixed.</p>
-
-<p>Page <a href="#Page_12">12</a>: “many nationalties” changed to “many nationalities”</p>
-
-<p>Page <a href="#Page_35">35</a>: “the the hands” changed to “the hands”</p>
-
-<p>Page <a href="#Page_116">116</a>: “Bernard Bosenquet” changed to “Bernard Bosanquet”</p>
-
-<p>Page <a href="#Page_123">123</a>: “emanicipated serfs” changed to “emancipated serfs”</p>
-
-<p>Page <a href="#Page_173">173</a>: “of the the group” changed to “of the group”</p>
-
-<p>Page <a href="#Page_174">174</a>: “girls wr bars of soap” changed to “girls wrap bars of soap”</p>
-
-<p>Page <a href="#Page_192">192</a>: “insanity workshops” changed to “insanitary workshops”</p>
-
-<p>Page <a href="#Page_194">194</a>: “work inself” changed to “work itself”</p>
-
-</div>
-<div style='display:block; margin-top:4em'>*** END OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK NEWER IDEALS OF PEACE ***</div>
-<div style='text-align:left'>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-Updated editions will replace the previous one&#8212;the old editions will
-be renamed.
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-Creating the works from print editions not protected by U.S. copyright
-law means that no one owns a United States copyright in these works,
-so the Foundation (and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United
-States without permission and without paying copyright
-royalties. Special rules, set forth in the General Terms of Use part
-of this license, apply to copying and distributing Project
-Gutenberg&#8482; electronic works to protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG&#8482;
-concept and trademark. Project Gutenberg is a registered trademark,
-and may not be used if you charge for an eBook, except by following
-the terms of the trademark license, including paying royalties for use
-of the Project Gutenberg trademark. If you do not charge anything for
-copies of this eBook, complying with the trademark license is very
-easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose such as creation
-of derivative works, reports, performances and research. Project
-Gutenberg eBooks may be modified and printed and given away&#8212;you may
-do practically ANYTHING in the United States with eBooks not protected
-by U.S. copyright law. Redistribution is subject to the trademark
-license, especially commercial redistribution.
-</div>
-
-<div style='margin-top:1em; font-size:1.1em; text-align:center'>START: FULL LICENSE</div>
-<div style='text-align:center;font-size:0.9em'>THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE</div>
-<div style='text-align:center;font-size:0.9em'>PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-To protect the Project Gutenberg&#8482; mission of promoting the free
-distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work
-(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase &#8220;Project
-Gutenberg&#8221;), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full
-Project Gutenberg&#8482; License available with this file or online at
-www.gutenberg.org/license.
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; font-size:1.1em; margin:1em 0; font-weight:bold'>
-Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg&#8482; electronic works
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg&#8482;
-electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to
-and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property
-(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all
-the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or
-destroy all copies of Project Gutenberg&#8482; electronic works in your
-possession. If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a
-Project Gutenberg&#8482; electronic work and you do not agree to be bound
-by the terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person
-or entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8.
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-1.B. &#8220;Project Gutenberg&#8221; is a registered trademark. It may only be
-used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who
-agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few
-things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg&#8482; electronic works
-even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See
-paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project
-Gutenberg&#8482; electronic works if you follow the terms of this
-agreement and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg&#8482;
-electronic works. See paragraph 1.E below.
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation (&#8220;the
-Foundation&#8221; or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection
-of Project Gutenberg&#8482; electronic works. Nearly all the individual
-works in the collection are in the public domain in the United
-States. If an individual work is unprotected by copyright law in the
-United States and you are located in the United States, we do not
-claim a right to prevent you from copying, distributing, performing,
-displaying or creating derivative works based on the work as long as
-all references to Project Gutenberg are removed. Of course, we hope
-that you will support the Project Gutenberg&#8482; mission of promoting
-free access to electronic works by freely sharing Project Gutenberg&#8482;
-works in compliance with the terms of this agreement for keeping the
-Project Gutenberg&#8482; name associated with the work. You can easily
-comply with the terms of this agreement by keeping this work in the
-same format with its attached full Project Gutenberg&#8482; License when
-you share it without charge with others.
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern
-what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are
-in a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States,
-check the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this
-agreement before downloading, copying, displaying, performing,
-distributing or creating derivative works based on this work or any
-other Project Gutenberg&#8482; work. The Foundation makes no
-representations concerning the copyright status of any work in any
-country other than the United States.
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg:
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other
-immediate access to, the full Project Gutenberg&#8482; License must appear
-prominently whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg&#8482; work (any work
-on which the phrase &#8220;Project Gutenberg&#8221; appears, or with which the
-phrase &#8220;Project Gutenberg&#8221; is associated) is accessed, displayed,
-performed, viewed, copied or distributed:
-</div>
-
-<blockquote>
- <div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
- This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States and most
- other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no restrictions
- whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms
- of the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online
- at <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org">www.gutenberg.org</a>. If you
- are not located in the United States, you will have to check the laws
- of the country where you are located before using this eBook.
- </div>
-</blockquote>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg&#8482; electronic work is
-derived from texts not protected by U.S. copyright law (does not
-contain a notice indicating that it is posted with permission of the
-copyright holder), the work can be copied and distributed to anyone in
-the United States without paying any fees or charges. If you are
-redistributing or providing access to a work with the phrase &#8220;Project
-Gutenberg&#8221; associated with or appearing on the work, you must comply
-either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 or
-obtain permission for the use of the work and the Project Gutenberg&#8482;
-trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg&#8482; electronic work is posted
-with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution
-must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any
-additional terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms
-will be linked to the Project Gutenberg&#8482; License for all works
-posted with the permission of the copyright holder found at the
-beginning of this work.
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg&#8482;
-License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this
-work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg&#8482;.
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this
-electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without
-prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with
-active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project
-Gutenberg&#8482; License.
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary,
-compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including
-any word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access
-to or distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg&#8482; work in a format
-other than &#8220;Plain Vanilla ASCII&#8221; or other format used in the official
-version posted on the official Project Gutenberg&#8482; website
-(www.gutenberg.org), you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense
-to the user, provide a copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means
-of obtaining a copy upon request, of the work in its original &#8220;Plain
-Vanilla ASCII&#8221; or other form. Any alternate format must include the
-full Project Gutenberg&#8482; License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1.
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying,
-performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg&#8482; works
-unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing
-access to or distributing Project Gutenberg&#8482; electronic works
-provided that:
-</div>
-
-<div style='margin-left:0.7em;'>
- <div style='text-indent:-0.7em'>
- &#8226; You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from
- the use of Project Gutenberg&#8482; works calculated using the method
- you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is owed
- to the owner of the Project Gutenberg&#8482; trademark, but he has
- agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the Project
- Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments must be paid
- within 60 days following each date on which you prepare (or are
- legally required to prepare) your periodic tax returns. Royalty
- payments should be clearly marked as such and sent to the Project
- Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the address specified in
- Section 4, &#8220;Information about donations to the Project Gutenberg
- Literary Archive Foundation.&#8221;
- </div>
-
- <div style='text-indent:-0.7em'>
- &#8226; You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies
- you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he
- does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg&#8482;
- License. You must require such a user to return or destroy all
- copies of the works possessed in a physical medium and discontinue
- all use of and all access to other copies of Project Gutenberg&#8482;
- works.
- </div>
-
- <div style='text-indent:-0.7em'>
- &#8226; You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of
- any money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the
- electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days of
- receipt of the work.
- </div>
-
- <div style='text-indent:-0.7em'>
- &#8226; You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
- distribution of Project Gutenberg&#8482; works.
- </div>
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project
-Gutenberg&#8482; electronic work or group of works on different terms than
-are set forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing
-from the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the manager of
-the Project Gutenberg&#8482; trademark. Contact the Foundation as set
-forth in Section 3 below.
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-1.F.
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable
-effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread
-works not protected by U.S. copyright law in creating the Project
-Gutenberg&#8482; collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg&#8482;
-electronic works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may
-contain &#8220;Defects,&#8221; such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate
-or corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other
-intellectual property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or
-other medium, a computer virus, or computer codes that damage or
-cannot be read by your equipment.
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the &#8220;Right
-of Replacement or Refund&#8221; described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project
-Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project
-Gutenberg&#8482; trademark, and any other party distributing a Project
-Gutenberg&#8482; electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all
-liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal
-fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT
-LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE
-PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE
-TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE
-LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR
-INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH
-DAMAGE.
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a
-defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can
-receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a
-written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you
-received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium
-with your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you
-with the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in
-lieu of a refund. If you received the work electronically, the person
-or entity providing it to you may choose to give you a second
-opportunity to receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If
-the second copy is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing
-without further opportunities to fix the problem.
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth
-in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you &#8216;AS-IS&#8217;, WITH NO
-OTHER WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT
-LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied
-warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of
-damages. If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement
-violates the law of the state applicable to this agreement, the
-agreement shall be interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or
-limitation permitted by the applicable state law. The invalidity or
-unenforceability of any provision of this agreement shall not void the
-remaining provisions.
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the
-trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone
-providing copies of Project Gutenberg&#8482; electronic works in
-accordance with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the
-production, promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg&#8482;
-electronic works, harmless from all liability, costs and expenses,
-including legal fees, that arise directly or indirectly from any of
-the following which you do or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this
-or any Project Gutenberg&#8482; work, (b) alteration, modification, or
-additions or deletions to any Project Gutenberg&#8482; work, and (c) any
-Defect you cause.
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; font-size:1.1em; margin:1em 0; font-weight:bold'>
-Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg&#8482;
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-Project Gutenberg&#8482; is synonymous with the free distribution of
-electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of
-computers including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It
-exists because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations
-from people in all walks of life.
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the
-assistance they need are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg&#8482;&#8217;s
-goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg&#8482; collection will
-remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project
-Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure
-and permanent future for Project Gutenberg&#8482; and future
-generations. To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary
-Archive Foundation and how your efforts and donations can help, see
-Sections 3 and 4 and the Foundation information page at www.gutenberg.org.
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; font-size:1.1em; margin:1em 0; font-weight:bold'>
-Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non-profit
-501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the
-state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal
-Revenue Service. The Foundation&#8217;s EIN or federal tax identification
-number is 64-6221541. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg Literary
-Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent permitted by
-U.S. federal laws and your state&#8217;s laws.
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-The Foundation&#8217;s business office is located at 809 North 1500 West,
-Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887. Email contact links and up
-to date contact information can be found at the Foundation&#8217;s website
-and official page at www.gutenberg.org/contact
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; font-size:1.1em; margin:1em 0; font-weight:bold'>
-Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-Project Gutenberg&#8482; depends upon and cannot survive without widespread
-public support and donations to carry out its mission of
-increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be
-freely distributed in machine-readable form accessible by the widest
-array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations
-($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt
-status with the IRS.
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating
-charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United
-States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a
-considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up
-with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations
-where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To SEND
-DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any particular state
-visit <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/donate/">www.gutenberg.org/donate</a>.
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we
-have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition
-against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who
-approach us with offers to donate.
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make
-any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from
-outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff.
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-Please check the Project Gutenberg web pages for current donation
-methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other
-ways including checks, online payments and credit card donations. To
-donate, please visit: www.gutenberg.org/donate
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; font-size:1.1em; margin:1em 0; font-weight:bold'>
-Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg&#8482; electronic works
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project
-Gutenberg&#8482; concept of a library of electronic works that could be
-freely shared with anyone. For forty years, he produced and
-distributed Project Gutenberg&#8482; eBooks with only a loose network of
-volunteer support.
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-Project Gutenberg&#8482; eBooks are often created from several printed
-editions, all of which are confirmed as not protected by copyright in
-the U.S. unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not
-necessarily keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper
-edition.
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-Most people start at our website which has the main PG search
-facility: <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org">www.gutenberg.org</a>.
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-This website includes information about Project Gutenberg&#8482;,
-including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary
-Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to
-subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks.
-</div>
-
-</div>
-</body>
-</html>
diff --git a/old/69879-h/images/cover.jpg b/old/69879-h/images/cover.jpg
deleted file mode 100644
index 6dbd8c0..0000000
--- a/old/69879-h/images/cover.jpg
+++ /dev/null
Binary files differ