diff options
| -rw-r--r-- | .gitattributes | 4 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | LICENSE.txt | 11 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | README.md | 2 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | old/68756-0.txt | 1533 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | old/68756-0.zip | bin | 35848 -> 0 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | old/68756-h.zip | bin | 689600 -> 0 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | old/68756-h/68756-h.htm | 2524 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | old/68756-h/images/cover.jpg | bin | 653302 -> 0 bytes |
8 files changed, 17 insertions, 4057 deletions
diff --git a/.gitattributes b/.gitattributes new file mode 100644 index 0000000..d7b82bc --- /dev/null +++ b/.gitattributes @@ -0,0 +1,4 @@ +*.txt text eol=lf +*.htm text eol=lf +*.html text eol=lf +*.md text eol=lf diff --git a/LICENSE.txt b/LICENSE.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..6312041 --- /dev/null +++ b/LICENSE.txt @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@ +This eBook, including all associated images, markup, improvements, +metadata, and any other content or labor, has been confirmed to be +in the PUBLIC DOMAIN IN THE UNITED STATES. + +Procedures for determining public domain status are described in +the "Copyright How-To" at https://www.gutenberg.org. + +No investigation has been made concerning possible copyrights in +jurisdictions other than the United States. Anyone seeking to utilize +this eBook outside of the United States should confirm copyright +status under the laws that apply to them. diff --git a/README.md b/README.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..ec6516d --- /dev/null +++ b/README.md @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@ +Project Gutenberg (https://www.gutenberg.org) public repository for +eBook #68756 (https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/68756) diff --git a/old/68756-0.txt b/old/68756-0.txt deleted file mode 100644 index ba334e5..0000000 --- a/old/68756-0.txt +++ /dev/null @@ -1,1533 +0,0 @@ -The Project Gutenberg eBook of The danger and immodesty of the -present too general custom of unnecessarily employing men-midwives., by -Anonymous - -This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States and -most other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no restrictions -whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms -of the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online at -www.gutenberg.org. If you are not located in the United States, you -will have to check the laws of the country where you are located before -using this eBook. - -Title: The danger and immodesty of the present too general custom of - unnecessarily employing men-midwives. - -Author: Anonymous - -Release Date: August 15, 2022 [eBook #68756] - -Language: English - -Produced by: deaurider and the Online Distributed Proofreading Team at - https://www.pgdp.net (This file was produced from images - generously made available by The Internet Archive) - -*** START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE DANGER AND IMMODESTY OF -THE PRESENT TOO GENERAL CUSTOM OF UNNECESSARILY EMPLOYING -MEN-MIDWIVES. *** - - - - - - - THE - DANGER AND IMMODESTY - OF - _The Present too general Custom of_ - UNNECESSARILY EMPLOYING - MEN-MIDWIVES. - - BEING - The Letters which lately appeared under - the Signature of - A MAN-MIDWIFE. - - WITH AN - INTRODUCTION, - A TREATISE ON THE MILK, - AND AN - APPENDIX. - - WITH CORRECTIONS - By the AUTHOR. - - LONDON: - Printed for J. WILKIE, No. 71, in St. Paul’s Church-Yard; - and F. BLYTH, John’s Coffee-House, Cornhill. - MDCCLXXII. - - - - -AN - -INTRODUCTION - -AND - -ADVICE TO THE LADIES, - -POINTING OUT - -_The DANGERS attending BACKENING their MILK the first four or five Weeks -after Delivery._ - - -To the PUBLIC. - -I have very long been convinced of the many dangerous Consequences which -attend the depraved Custom of employing Men-midwives unnecessarily—and -have been for some Years intending from Month to Month to write my Ideas -on that Subject, in order to combat the very destructive Practice, and -endeavour to awaken the slumbering good Sense of the Nation. But when I -reflected on the great Difficulty of conquering Prejudice—considered how -generally the Opinion had been adopted that “Men were the most proper -Attendants on the Labours of Women,” I confess the Task appeared too -arduous—and I was discouraged. - -I knew, that _no_ Arguments, _even if an Angel was to descend from -Heaven to utter them_, could persuade the Ladies _to be satisfied_ with -Midwives of _their own_ Sex, _after the fine Polish_ had been _once_ -RUB’D OFF which _modesty ought_ to have _work’d up_ to such a _bright_ -Pitch of _high finish’d_ Excellence, as _not_ to have been capable of -admitting the impure stain within the glossy smoothness of its beautiful -enamel!—I knew, that, assisted by the greatest Part of the Faculty (whose -_INTEREST, as well as PLEASURE_ would be at STAKE) they would leave _no -means_ untried—they would call in _every fallacious_ art to their aid, -_to continue THE DECEPTION_, by _ridiculing_ Arguments which they _could -not confute_—and that _un_married Ladies, through _an Opinion_ of the -_Virtue of their Friends_, and swayed, and _kept in Countenance_, by -_the prevalent_ Custom of the Times, would naturally _fall into the -Stream_, and _not_ be undeceived until _too far hurried by the Current_ -to be _afterwards_ able to recede.—On the other Hand, I likewise knew -that our young Men _of Fashion_ had _long ago_ resolved _to bid Adieu TO -THINKING_. Leaving _that troublesome_ Employment _to others_, they were -intent on pursuing the far nobler Gratifications _of Sense_—endeavouring -to bury in a round of _trifling_ Dissipations, _every_ Sentiment meriting -the Attention of _reasonable_ Beings that an Attempt to work on _such_ -Minds would be Absurdity in the extreme,—for, that, even _if they were -convinced_ of the two uncontrovertable Truths I wish to establish, -by being satisfied that Men were _not_ so safe as Women, and that -Men-midwives polluted the Minds of their Wives, and rendered them easy -Preys to Seduction, yet these Sentiments would have had _no_ Weight -_with them_, because they married without Love, Religion, Principle—_the -only_ Ingredients capable of forming _national_ Happiness. _Impure_ in -their _Souls, debauch’d_ in their _Persons_, Libertinism opened _the -only Avenue_ which could present them with a Prospect of Enjoyments -_adapted to their_ Sensations—_their_ Joys were independent of their -Wive’s Society—their Healths consequently were only _politely_ wish’d -for—and they would of course readily _risk_ their Wive’s Purity being -contaminated, rather than _be disappointed_ in the Pleasure of seducing -the Wives _of their acquaintance_, through the _preparatory_ Assistance -of the _Men_-midwives. The Happiness of our gay young Men _not_ being -centered within the narrow Circle of Home, _the Virtue_ of their Wives -is not in the least essential, has no Weight, _when ballanced_ with -_the Advantages_ they derive from the too _general_ Prostitution of the -Sex. They _extract Balm_ from _the Vices_ of _Other_ Women, which has -sovereign Efficacy _in healing_ any Wounds—_alleviating_ any smarts, -which they may receive, or feel, from the infidelity of _their own_ -Wives—whom they never treated as their _rational Companions_, whose -Affections they were desirous of fixing irremoveably,—but as _necessary_ -Beings to do the Honours of their Tables—furnish Heirs—and save their -Estates from being encumbered with the Payment of the Fortunes of their -younger Brothers and Sisters. The only View on _one_ side, is _Money_—on -the _other_, _Quality_—_each_ having attain’d the _only_ Object _they -aim’d at in Marriage_,—each, without any fundamental Principle of -Goodness, to restrain their Pursuits within the Bounds of Virtue, they -throw off the Mask of Decency—and riot in Vice!—Our young Men think -the Scriptures fit only to impose on Weakness. The Injunctions of the -Gospel interfere with their Enjoyments—and having never believed it’s -sacred Truths—or endeavoured to follow it’s amiable Precepts, they -never experienced the serene Tranquillity arising from the delightful -Possession of an approving Conscience. At the best, _forgetful_ even of -the Existence of a God—and laughing at the idle supposition of a future -state, they give the Reins without Controul to all their Appetites and -Passions—check’d by nothing but what _they term HONOUR_. But _THEIR -Honour_ is comprised, in—_punishing the Man with MURDER who dares to -doubt_ their veracity, or fail in Respect to their Dignity—and in paying -their Debts _to SHARPERS_, instead of rewarding the Industry of their -Tradesmen, by giving them—_their own Property_. _THEIR Honour_ does -not restrain them from defiling the Beds _of their Friends_—_BREAKING -Promises_ to _WORTHY Dependants_—or _betraying_ the Interests and Honour -of their Country for _base Wages of Iniquity_, though committed with -Confidence to their Charge, _yet sacrificed_ without Remorse, for their -_private_ Emolument. _THEIR Honour_ enforces _no single Virtue_!—AWAY -WITH SUCH HONOUR! - -I next consider’d the number of _well-disposed_ Men, who _through -Prejudice_ might _neglect_; or through Indolence, or Weakness of -Understanding, be blind to the Force of my Arguments, and of course -remain unconvinced by them—and these Obstacles, united, appeared too -formidable to be surmounted by any weak Effort I could make through the -Channel of a News Paper. At last however I took Courage and submitted my -Sentiments to the Consideration of the Public, in the Gazetteer of the -28th of March. - -I had not, at that time, any Intention of writing another Letter,—but -deriving Hopes from the favourable Impression my first seem’d to have -made on the Minds of the Considerate—and having heard weight laid on _the -Men’s Knowledge of Anatomy_ as a Reason why _they_ should _be safer_ -than Women, I wrote the second Letter to remove _that specious_, but -_mistaken_ Idea—and having _known_ some, and heard of _many_ other young -Men Midwives, who really _are ignorant_ of that Knowledge of Anatomy -which is _their only_ Recommendation _to INFATUATED Husbands_;—and a -Man Midwife, under the Signature of “Old Chiron,” having endeavoured to -abuse the World with the most scandalous misrepresentations, and _gross -Fallacies_, my last Letter appeared to expose the Danger of employing raw -young Men—or believing such _interested Deceivers_. - -I am quite indifferent about the Offence which my Letters have given _the -Ladies of Fashion_, and their _darling_ Doctors—_their “sweet Men.”_ -They are conscious my Letters convey only _a very faint_ Sketch of -their _immodest, obscene practices_. They are _too bad_ to be _exactly_ -described without using Language very unfit for the Inspection of -virtuous Women!—I place dreadful Rocks in their View, to warn them from a -Course on which their Purity would be irretrievably wreck’d: and surely -those Parents entertain _strange_ Notions of _Virtue_, who carefully keep -my Letters out of the way of their Daughters, through what _they imagine -to be_ “Delicacy!”—they would rather, in short, have them _polluted in -future—past redemption_—than instructed by my friendly Admonitions, -how to avoid the Path to Vice!—the modest, amiable, worthy, _sensible_ -Part of the Community, I am confident, will read my Pamphlet with -Candour—approve of the Sentiments contain’d in it—and recommend it to the -Perusal of others. I shall view the Censures, and Displeasure of _the -vicious_, and the _dissipated_, as the highest Eulogiums;—as Praise—which -will convey _the most genial warmth_ to my Heart—and, I trust, afford me -a pleasing Retrospect in my _latest_ Hours!— - -My Letters having succeeded beyond my most sanguine Expectation, I am now -encouraged to attack _another_ prevailing Custom among the Fair—that of -_not_ giving suck to their Infants, at least during the first five or six -weeks. - -I shall wave considering _the Propriety_ of a Mother’s giving suck -through a Sense of the _incumbent Duty_ she _owes_ her child.—Though the -Custom of backening the Milk is _unnatural_, dangerous, and too often -_fatal_, I shall lay no stress on the former, but rest it entirely on -the latter—for in _such_ an Age as the present, in which our fine Ladies -have few Ideas of any Religion—are not capable of receiving Pleasure -from _domestick_ Employments—would infinitely rather CONVERSE with _any -Men_ than their _Husbands_—leave their Children to be instructed, or -_neglected_ by Servants, and fly abroad, with eager Impatience _to game -away_ their Husbands Fortunes, and receive the _criminal_ Addresses of -_their profligate_ Admirers, at the Assembly, the Masquerade, or more -_commodious Apartments_ of _the Coterie_—laughing at the Censures of _the -few_ who have still some Regard to Decorum—and despising the Belief of -the perpetual Presence of a Being who is Witness to all their _secret -vicious Deformities_—in _such_ times it would be Folly to mention the -Dangers they expose their Infants to, from diseased Milk, want of a -tender Mother’s Care—or dream of asking them how they will answer to -the Almighty for _not_ having afforded them the Nourishment He kindly -provided for their Support?—I shall therefore only shew the Absurdity and -_danger_ of this Custom, as far as it regards the Health of _the Mother_. - -And here I must endeavour to give my Readers some Idea of that part of -the human Body which is concern’d in the formation, and absorbtion of -the Milk, in order for their understanding the Force of my arguments. - -Our Bodies are constantly, when in Health, receiving Repairs in all -their Parts, from millions of the smallest, most minute Arteries. Every -Solid, and every Juice, is form’d out of, and secreted from, Blood. Those -noxious Parts of the Blood which are not proper for these different, -_opposite_ Uses, are thrown off by insensible Perspiration. When, through -various Causes, that Perspiration is obstructed, the acrid Matter which -ought to have gone off, is absorb’d by the lymphatick Vessels, and -returns into the Blood—brings on Fevers, Gout, Rheumatism, &c. &c. - -The Lymphaticks, are numberless Vessels, which pass through spungy -Glands. These fine Tubes have a vast number of Valves, which prevent -the Lymph, (or Liquor) which runs through them from going _a contrary_ -Direction from that intended for it. These fine Vessels are dispersed -over every Part of our Bodies. The Point of a needle could not be applied -to a Spot, under the Skin, where the Mouth of a lymphatic Vessel did not -open to imbibe whatever is put in contact with it. These minute Branches -run into other Branches, so form larger Vessels, till at last they all -unite in a general Reservoir, where the Lymph which they contained, mixes -with the Chyle, (the fine Part of our Food, which is fit to be converted -into Blood) conducted there by the Lacteals, (the Lacteals resemble the -Lymphaticks—they open into the Stomach, and Bowels—they imbibe nothing -but from _our Food_) the Chyle, and Lymph, thus mix’d, run up within the -trunk of a large Vessel called the thoracic Duct, on the inside of the -back Bone, which is incessantly emptying it’s Liquor into a Vein under -the left Collar Bone, where it mixes with the Blood, is immediately -convey’d into the vena Cava, which conducts it, with the returning Blood -from the rest of the Body, (Lungs excepted) into the right Auricle of -the Heart—it thence is drove by the contraction of the Auricle, into the -right Ventricle of the Heart—by it’s contraction, into the Pulmonary -Artery—from thence through the whole Lungs, where the Blood receives a -Change from being impregnated with something received from the Air every -Inspiration. The Blood thus changed, is collected from the Lungs into the -Pulmonary Veins, and conducted into the left Auricle of the Heart; which -drives it into the left Ventricle; which forces it into a great Artery, -the Aorta—which rushes it over every other Part of the Body. - -The lymphatic Vessels prevent our Blood depending _solely_ on our Food -for supply, and by means of them we can subsist some time merely on -the Produce of our own Bodies. All these lymphatic Vessels are closely -accompanied by Arteries—whose Pulsations assist the motion of the Lymph -to it’s Reservoir:⸺Consequently the quicker and stronger they beat, -the faster the Lymph is hurried into the Blood. Hence the Reason why -Fevers occasion so speedy a wasting of the Flesh—hence Hectics bring -on Consumptions—hence People in Fevers can subsist long with little -Food,—The lymphaticks then supplying the Blood too abundantly from our -own Juices. - -The Author of Nature has ordered an extraordinary Quantity of Blood to -be prepared for the Child’s Food. Arteries run into the Glands of the -Breasts, and in passing through them, the Blood, by a most wonderful -Change, is converted into Milk!⸺by a Change, which nothing but Custom -prevents our viewing as a Miracle! - -The admired Toast of the Town cannot endure the Trouble of nursing. It -would confine her too much at home—it has too vulgar an appearance—it -is not warranted by _the Example_ of the first Circle—the Milk must -_therefore_ be backen’d.—It is denied Liberty to discharge itself by the -Out-lett Providence _intended for it_—the Child, whose Constitution _it -was calculated for_, is not suffered to have it’s Due. What becomes of -the Milk? - -It is absorb’d by the lymphatic Vessels, _contrary_ to the _original_ -Intention of Nature—and convey’d back into the Blood, in the manner -I have before described.—What is the Consequence?—The blood Vessels -become _not only highly over-charged_ with Blood, but that Blood is thus -rendered of an improper Consistence. A Fever ensues!—This Fever comes -on when the woman is _ill able to bear_ it’s Shock!—_How often_ is this -Fever _fatal_! - -The most fortunate Circumstance that can happen, is, when the Milk finds -_ANOTHER out-lett_. Probably _otherwise_ there may be a formation of -Matter somewhere—there is danger _that_ Matter may fly to some capital -Part. - -If the Woman is young, healthy, strong, it is most probable the Milk will -_not_ be absorb’d _quick enough_. The Blood will _furnish_ Milk _faster_ -than the lymphatick Vessels can imbibe it, and convey it back again. The -Breasts are painfully distended—they inflame. - -_When too late_—it is then resolved they shall be suck’d. - -During the time of Pregnancy a small quantity of Milk is lodged in -the Milk Vessels of the Breasts. This Milk, when the nine Months are -expired, is thick—clogs the Vessels. If the Woman never gave suck, the -Pores through which the Milk ought to issue to the Child, are not open -enough—they require therefore _to be clear’d_, by the _old_ Milk being -suck’d off, _the very day of the Delivery_, and to empty the Milk Vessels -of what must otherwise clog them. Some woman ought to suck this off -therefore _as soon as possible_. If the Child is put to the Breast _in -Twelve, or Sixteen Hours_ after it’s Birth, it will suck _greedily_—if -delay’d three or four Days, it is twenty to one the Child will not -attempt it for a long time. - -When therefore _the Necessity_ of the Case has overcome every Resolution -form’d for the Woman’s _not_ giving suck, and her Child is put to her -Breast, it is in vain!—the Child will not touch the Breast!—_other_ -Children—or women attempt to ease the poor Woman of her Load of Milk—this -Resource likewise fails! the thick Milk has clog’d the Vessels—the -N-pp-es, owing to the hard Distension of the Breasts, has shrunk into -them—and, besides, their Pores have never been open’d—never been -clear’d—no endeavours avail! the distress’d Woman, after having been -sadly fatigued, exhausted, finds herself disappointed of Relief!—dreadful -Symptoms soon appear! she _too probably_ falls a sacrifice to a -ridiculous—senseless—not to say a sinful deviation _from the Path of -Nature_!—how many fine young Women have lately died—and go off every -Year, from this Cause! - -But “_particular_ Women have not Constitutions strong enough to bear -giving suck. Certainly there are some Women whom it might hurt.” Granted. -Let such particular Women give suck _only_ for the first _four_, _five_ -or _six Weeks_. If those Women _then_ really find themselves too delicate -for the _longer_ continuance of such a Drain, they then _may safely_ -by degrees leave off giving suck—they have sufficiently recover’d -Strength to venture throwing the Milk gently back into the Blood. The -most delicately form’d Woman existing should _not_ dream of suffering a -single Drop of the Milk which Nature _intended for Evacuation_, to return -into the Blood, untill the Constitution is re-established—and enabled to -bear discharging itself of the Superfluities, without encountering the -Dangers which _demonstrably_ attend a contrary Practice. If a Woman is -too delicate to bear _continuing to suckle_ her Infant, surely she is -_too delicate_ to endure the flying in the Face of Nature, and _risking_ -the Fever—if she is healthy and strong, the more incumbent her duty is, -to nourish her Child—her danger too equal. In _every_ View, the salutary -Consequences attending Mothers discharging their Duty to their Children -in this point, are so obvious, so glaring, that _to me_ it is matter of -doubt whether those who fail in it are most to be condemn’d and despised -for _their want of natural Affection_—or pitied and ridiculed _for their -Folly_. - -These are my Ideas on this interesting Subject. Let those Women who -_obstinately_ persevere in a Resolution to deny their Infants their -natural Food—(and in whose Judgements my Arguments have appear’d -deficient in Weight) stand the Trial, and risk the Consequence. I most -sincerely hope the Success may answer their Wishes! - -I now refer my Readers to the following Letters. I can assert, _with -conscious Truth_ that my Sentiments on the _preceding_, and _following_ -Subjects, have been the offspring of an Heart warm’d by a Love for my -fellow-Creatures—ever most ardently solicitous for their Welfare and -Happiness, here and hereafter. - -I cannot expect _to reclaim_ any Woman who has _already used_ a _Man_, -for Reasons I gave at the beginning of this Introduction, and because, -by quitting him, she would _tacitly_ acknowledge the Truth of my -Assertions—and because none but those possess’d of the most exalted -Qualities of the Head and Heart, can have _greatness_ enough _to confess_ -they have been in an Error of _such_ a Nature. - -I am not without hopes however, of _opening the Eyes_ of _sensible_ -Men—and unmarried Women, who are _at present_ modest, and _wish_ to -_remain so_—and preventing the _former from advising_, and the _latter -from falling into_ the scandalous Custom of employing _Men_-Midwifes, -which _I know_ to be _ERRONEOUS as to it’s PRETENDED SAFETY_—_FATALLY -dangerous_ to the VIRTUE—and _CERTAINLY destructive_ of the MODESTY[1] -of my fair Countrywomen.—They may believe me when I assure them that NO -PURITY can withstand the _rude_ Shock of _such_ Intrusions—_the whitest_ -Ermine is _most_ liable to have it’s Beauties sullied! - -If I should be happy enough to hear in a few Years that I have given -the least Check to this most abandon’d of _vicious_ Practices, the -Consciousness of having done a most signal Service to the Community, will -implant genuine Pleasure—substantial Satisfaction in the Breast of - - the Public’s - most obedient - humble Servant, - - THE AUTHOR. - -[1] I make a great Distinction _between Modesty_, and _Virtue_. A Woman -_may_ be _virtuous_, _without_ being _Modest_—but it is _impossible_ -to be _modest_, without being _virtuous_. Modesty is _the guard_ of -Virtue—but it _is possible_ a _cold_ Constitution _may_ preserve -_Virtue_, even _after_ every Trace of _Modesty_ has been obliterated. - - - - -THE Danger and Immodesty, _&c._ - - - - -LETTER I. - - -In times, when every winter brings scenes of prostitution from the -privacy of darkness into the public light of day; when our ladies of -quality, and women of fashion, instead of being as remarkable for their -virtue, as for their beauty, openly cast aside every sense of shame, and -barefacedly encourage the addresses of men, who, avowedly, can have no -intention but to involve them in guilt; it is the duty of every honest -man to endeavour to trace the evil _to its source_, in order that, by -pointing out _the foul spring_ which corrupts the stream, _the fountain -may be cleared_, and the contagion which rages from it, lessened, if not -entirely removed. - -Boarding schools are, beyond doubt, seminaries, where the minds of girls -are early polluted. Let the mistress of the school be ever so virtuous, -prudent, and attentive, the vicious girls (and some such there always -must be among a number) will find sufficient opportunities to taint the -tender minds of unsuspecting innocence. Nothing can be more destructive -than bad example; and, unfortunately, the human mind is too ready to -copy those which are vicious—and _the vicious_ are more importunate and -solicitous _to corrupt_, than _the virtuous_ are to gain proselytes to -goodness. - -Though I believe _the first seeds of vice_ are imbibed at a boarding -school, yet I _by no means_ look on that education as the great cause of -these frequent adulteries. If principles of virtue have been inculcated -in infancy, they may yet, with proper care, bud out afresh under good -culture—and flourish under the influence of good advice, when those -noxious weeds are choaked up, which were planted by bad examples, but -which may wither on the cause being removed. - -_It is to the almost universal custom of EMPLOYING MEN-MIDWIVES, that I -attribute the frequent ADULTERIES which disgrace our country._ - -_Ignorance_ has spread this _shameless_ custom. Ignorance leads people -to suppose men _safer_ than women—Ignorance of _what_ the _Men_-midwives -_do_, leads modest women _at first_ to submit to employ men; and _it is -ignorance_ which leads husbands [who love their wives] to recommend, nay -even sometimes force them on their wives. They know not what stripes they -are preparing for themselves—they know not that they are removing the -corner stone on which the virtue of their wives is founded—and all this -on _a mistaken_ principle—_the idea that men are safest_. - -The Almighty, through kindness to his creatures, has so ordered the -labours of women, that even the honest part of the Men-midwife tribe -confess, that, in thirty years practice, a person might probably never -meet _with a single case_ where a good woman might not have done the -business. This confession was made to me by an eminent man-midwife, -after a practice of thirty-six years. How else would the world have -been peopled? The men have _but lately_ come into fashion. In praise of -_Scotland_ and _Ireland_ be it spoken, _the women of those countries are -still too modest to employ them_. What is the consequence? _Adulteries_ -happen _very seldom in those countries_; and every farm-house swarms -with strong, healthy, _well-limbed_ children. If Men-midwives were -requisite to bring children into the world, what would become of the -wilds of America—the plains of Africa? Even the _Hottentot women_ are too -modest to employ men—they leave that abandoned custom _to our English -ladies_—yet they are so fruitful they furnish slaves to the globe. It -is a notorious fact, that more children have been lost since women were -so scandalously indecent as to employ men, than for ages before that -practice became so general. Women have _a tenderness of feeling for their -own sex_ in labour, which _it is impossible men can ever equal them in_. -By _having felt_ the pains, and the anxieties attending child-birth, -they know how to sympathize in a woman’s sufferings. _Their_ feelings, -therefore, are _natural_. They lead them to be patient—they prompt them -_to allow nature to do her own_ peculiar work. They never dream of having -recourse to force—the _barbarous, bloody crotchet_ never stained _their_ -hands with _murder_. There _never really_ can be occasion for a male -operator, but when a deed must be done which my soul shudders at the idea -of, and which I shall not mention—but thanks to God, such instances do -not occur in a century!—To my knowledge, a lady was twice delivered in -different parts of the country of England, by common women-midwives, and -both those cases were _as unnatural_ and difficult as it is well possible -to imagine—she and the children did well—if she had employed men, it is -more than probable, _the children, at least_, would have expired under -the crotchet—or been maimed by the forceps! - -And how should this be otherwise! a long _un-impassioned_ practice, -_early_ commenced, and _calmly_ pursued, is absolutely requisite to give -men _by art_, what women attain _by nature_.—Dr. Hunter, very wisely, -very justly has said, that “Labour is nature’s work.”—Nature _ought to be -suffered_ nine hundred and ninety-nine times out of a thousand, _to do -her own work_. All the knowledge _young_ men can possibly obtain, must be -from _dead_ bodies—for is it in common sense to suppose, that a young lad -can explore the secret recesses of Venus, so as to be _physically_ well -acquainted with those parts in _living_ females? No—fires must quickly -be raised, which unavoidably will confuse all his discerning _reasoning_ -faculties—and _ART must instantly be lost in NATURE_. Dr. Hunter, indeed, -and one or two men besides, _may perhaps_, by the help of _cold_ -constitutions, and dint of very long practice, do their business _nearly -as well_ as women—by leaving all _to nature_—but, if my life and fortune -here, and salvation hereafter, depended on the life of any pregnant -woman, and that of her infant, I would stake all I held valuable on her -being attended by any old woman midwife in England, in preference to any -man in the world. Whoever reads Nihel’s Midwifery, will be satisfied of -this truth, that _women are infinitely safer than men_. - -Who can wonder at the profligacy of the times, when it is known that even -women of character soon become so callous to the bashfulness which ought -to characterize their sex (from being habituated to the familiarities -of their Men-midwives) that they will not scruple informing a male -visitor, without even blushing, “I was not very well for some days in -the country—so I came to town on purpose to be satisfied by Dr. ⸺ that -I was in a good way—_the dear man_ has told me that _the child lies -right_—and I am perfectly easy.” Monstrous! that a lady can pretend to -any degree of modesty, and yet, _not content_ with having _a strange_ man -attending her _for hours_ when in labour (most of that time intimately -acquainted with _every_ part) she can, without any compunction, send for -a man, and admit him without reserve _to the most unbounded_ liberties, -at a time too, when she is _as able_ to walk, and _do every other act_ -of life, as if she was not pregnant! Pray let me ask her ladyship, _how_ -did “_The dear man_,”—“_sweet Dr. ⸺_,” _find out_ how the child lay?—By -means _sufficient to taint the purity_, and _fully the chastity_, of -any woman breathing!—I will boldly affirm, that, whoever admits a man -to those _licentious_ freedoms, cannot pretend to answer for what _may_ -be the consequences. If _the last_ circumstance does not take place, it -must be owing, either to an extraordinary insensibility in the man, or -to the woman’s not suiting his taste, having such choice of beauties to -visit. Suppose, for argument’s sake, that the fictitious Goddess of -Chastity, Diana herself, was on earth, and employed me to satisfy her -doubts, during the months of pregnancy prior to labour—and her mind of -course, at first, free from the smallest tincture of guilty ideas—yet, if -I chose it, I could _so bewilder her reason_, that she should _lose sight -of every principle of virtue_—and not _be able_ to refuse me whatever I -chose to desire.—When a man is in free possession of the Citadel, and all -the out-works surrendered at discretion, it is then too late to attempt -guarding the town from plunder. - -But supposing these advantages are not always taken (_which I dare say -they are not_) it cannot be denied _with truth_ these visitations from -Men-midwives, remove in a great measure, the horror of those intrusions -on the advanced posts of virtue, which are its greatest safeguards—and -serve _to prepare the way_ for the addresses of gay young men, who make -it their business to seduce married women into the paths of infamy. - -If any lady, desirous of exculpating herself from my censure, pleads -that “she never admits a Man-midwife _to familiarities_ but when _in -actual labour_”—I answer, that, even _in actual_ labour—_a woman has many -intervals of ease_, for many minutes together quite free from pain—_in -those intervals_, her mind _cannot_ maintain _its spotless whiteness_—_in -those_ intervals she cannot but _be conscious_, that the _DOCTOR is -infringing on the HUSBAND_. - -But I believe there are very few women who confine the Doctor’s -familiarities to the times of real labour. Lady ⸺, Mrs. ⸺, acquiesce in -whatever he thinks right during all the months of pregnancy—and must -he not be _MORE than man_, or LESS THAN MAN, who, _roving luxuriously_ -through all the _hidden_ charms of beauty, can help being inflamed by -passion?—and, _if inflamed by passion_, he may proceed ON CERTAINTIES -... he has an _UNERRING tell-tale under his inspection_, which gives him -_an INFALLIBLE cue, when he may safely_ throw aside the mask, fearless of -any repulse. - -Shew some sense of modesty, ye Duchesses, Countesses, &c. &c. and -those inferior women, whom _ye have debauched_ by your bad examples, -will again imitate ye, in forsaking these Scandalous practices. Blush, -ye women of fashion, to own that any man, besides your husbands, _is -admitted to liberties with your persons_. No longer talk of “_dear_ -Doctor Hunter,” “_angelic_ Doctor—” “_enchanting_ Doctor—.” ... For my -own part, if I was a married man, I declare it would be _a matter of the -utmost indifference_ to me, whether my wife had spent the night _in a -bagnio_—or an hour of the forenoon locked up with a man-midwife in her -dressing room.—Let this _shameless_ custom be abolished, and then virtue -will fly back again to our metropolis, with all her train of _genuine -self-approving pleasures_—and England be _once more_ as much famed for -the chastity, as for the beauty of its women. - -Adieu, Mr. Printer—you have received this letter from a sincere admirer -of female modesty: Without it “beauty _ceases being lovely_, or wit -being engaging.” Whoever possesses it cannot be enough esteemed and -regarded—whoever is deficient in it cannot be sufficiently despised and -slighted. Ye _English_ fair, _it ought_ to be your characteristic! _but -while your fathers, husbands, and brothers are unprincipled, corrupted -senators_—you think you have a right to deviate from _your point of -honour_, since _they shew you the example in their’s_. - -To conclude—_true modesty is incompatible with the idea of employing_ - - A MAN MIDWIFE[2]. - -[2] Except when those _very rare instances_ occur, which do not happen -once in two thousand labours. - - - - -LETTER II. - - -The favourable reception my last letter met with from the public, leads -me to hope our married men will seriously reflect on the dangers which -attend the employing Men-midwives to attend their wives, except in cases -where there is the most urgent necessity for the interference of art. I -flatter myself it will not be difficult to convince _sensible_, _modest_ -women of two undeniable truths, which nothing but prejudice, or vice, can -render them blind to the force of:—First, that Men-midwives are not so -safe as women;—and secondly, that it is absolutely impossible to permit -men to take the unbounded freedoms which Men-midwives _falsely pretend -are necessary_, without throwing themselves entirely at their mercy, and, -at all events, being polluted by their needless invasion. - -The Men-midwives and their friends, have wisely chose to be silent. -They are conscious my assertions cannot be denied with any shadow of -truth, they therefore prudently have declined the combat. If they had -attempted controverting my arguments, they must have discovered the sandy -foundations on which they have established the idea of _their being -the proper_ attendants on the labours of women. Objections which they -cannot remove,—dangers which they cannot dissipate,—and impurities which -no varnish can conceal, they wish to avoid mentioning; fearful lest an -attempt to answer my letter, should display to the world the weakness and -insufficiency of their defence, and stimulate abler pens than mine to -continue the subject too long for their interest. They vainly imagine my -letter will soon be forgotten, and be consigned to oblivion amongst waste -paper. But they are mistaken,—this letter shall accompany it annually to -the press, to remind my fair countrywomen of the inestimable value of -chastity,—and to warn them from those practices which pave the way to the -most flagrant breach of it;—and I am not without hope that I shall be -joined by the friends of virtue, and assisted in the arduous talk I have -undertaken. What undertaking can be more difficult to succeed in, than an -endeavour to reform the manners of a vicious age? Yet, encouraged by the -consciousness of the rectitude of my intentions, and of the sincerity of -my wishes to repair the foundations of matrimonial happiness, I freely -offer my sentiments to the world,—let the candid weigh them in the scale -of common-sense,—and either adopt, or disregard them, as they appear to -tend to the benefit, or prejudice of mankind. The consequence of their -decision will principally affect themselves,—it will not reach to me. - -The Men-midwives are sensible, that, when they urge their knowledge in -anatomy as a reason for their being safer than women, they mean to take -advantage of _the ignorance_ of mankind. Where _very rare_, _particular_ -circumstances occur, undoubtedly the knowledge of anatomy becomes then -absolutely necessary to direct the operator in the means requisite to -save the woman’s life. In that distressed, unhappy, deplorable situation, -no modesty can possibly be violated. The poor afflicted woman, is, _if -sensible_, so taken up with anxious thoughts, and torturing pains, that -she is _not conscious_ of the transaction—and the Royal Exchange, when -crouded, might be spectators, without attracting her attention, or -interrupting her fears. It is quite different in _a very large majority_ -of labours. The woman has many intervals of ease,—she does not apprehend -there is any peculiar danger in her case:—her mind, while free from -pain, is at liberty calmly to attend to whatever is done. There is not -above one labour in a thousand where there is any occasion for the -knowledge of anatomy. I insist that _except in those very extraordinary -cases_, a knowledge of anatomy leads Men-midwives frequently to do great -mischief. _It makes them impatient._ They _know how_ to bring on the -labour pains,—they _know how to force the birth_. From _this DESTRUCTIVE -KNOWLEDGE_, numbers of children are demolished,—numbers of women are -thrown into fevers by _lacerations_ and _inflammations_, which might -have the worst consequences, and which never would have happened _if -the knowledge of anatomy_ had not _tempted men_ to have recourse _to -ART within the proper boundaries of NATURE’S empire_. For this reason, -if I was a married man, I would not employ _even a woman_ who had been -bred under a Man-midwife. Her _knowing the parts ANATOMICALLY_, and -_understanding the USE of INSTRUMENTS_, and pursuing the _teizing_, -_fiddling_ customs of the men who had instructed her, instead of -recommending her to me, would be a sufficient cause to prevent my -employing her. - -_THE ONLY SAFE KNOWLEDGE for a midwife to possess_, is, _that which is -taught by EXPERIENCE_. Whenever it _ceases_ being possible for nature, -with such assistance, to do her work, _then_, and _then only_, art ought -to be called in with instruments to aid.—Yet our young women are not -ashamed _premeditately to resolve_ on employing men, though there are -such a multitude of chances _against_ the supposition of a dead child—or -that there will be occasion for the destruction of her infant to save her -own life. It is for this wanton use of men, that I wish I had abilities -to expose their want of modesty in colours striking enough to hold out -our women to the universal ridicule of the world, and draw down on them -the contempt and indignation of the virtuous. - -Is it not laughable to hear of a _modest_ woman sending for _a man_ -to inform her _whether or not she is with child_, and _how far -gone_?—Heavens! _a little patience_ would soon have cleared up that -matter, and the most skilful man may be mistaken, _even allowing the -supposition_ (which is _NOT probable_) THAT HE MAY BE QUITE COOL, and -_experience NO FLUTTERING sensations to confuse his mind during THE -SERIOUS investigation_. Why cannot the lady _allow a few months_ to -elapse? Her doubts would then have been removed, without any _male_ -intrusions, _without SCANDALOUS VIOLATIONS of MODESTY_—without, what I -term, SHAMEFUL POLLUTIONS OF HER PERSON. - -What must Men-midwives think of those ladies, who send for them to be -inspected on such trifling occasions? _What can they avoid thinking?_ -Must they not conclude, that those ladies are restrained from adultery -_NOT by any principle_ of virtue, but by a dread of the consequences; -and, since they can admit no man to familiarities but their Man-midwife -(who is the _priviledged father confessor of England_) without losing -their reputations, they are resolved to be _as immodest_, without losing -their characters, as the depraved, profligate custom of the world can -authorize them? Men-midwives entertain each other with curious recitals -of their adventures among the fair:—Surely those women cannot justly be -pitied, who thus by their folly, or vice, furnish subjects _first_ for -their sensual _ideas_, and _afterwards_ for their mirth. - -I have been a good deal amused by hearing my letter commented on in -different companies, where the author was far from being suspected -to be present. The Men-midwives, and the ladies who receive pleasure -from employing them, never can forgive me for having exposed their -conduct. All they can however say against me, is, that I am “_very -indelicate_;”—that “_it is a shame such papers should appear_.”—Let them -be informed, Mr. Printer, that IF I AM “INDELICATE,” it is _because -THEY ARE IMMODEST_. Where _the bone_ is _corrupted_, the flesh must be -removed, and _the foul parts laid bare_, in order to be _scraped_, and -_purified_—_desperate disorders require desperate remedies_. _The “shame” -does not consist IN WHAT I WRITE but IN WHAT THEY DO_.—_Let them QUIT -THEIR PRACTICE, I will most readily throw aside my pen._ - -I should be sorry to entertain so bad an opinion of the generality of my -fair countrywomen, as to suppose them hardened by the depraved custom -of the times, beyond a possibility of being roused to a sense of danger -for themselves and infants, and to a sense of virtue. Doctor Hunter -is, beyond dispute, _the best Man_-midwife in the world—yet, let the -advocates for the _indiscriminate_ use of men lay their hands on their -hearts, and answer me ingenuously this question—Suppose any _three_ of -the _best_ Midwives in London had lost _in their lives, the same number_ -of women of fashion _Doctor Hunter_ has lost _within these two or three -years_,[3] would they not have exclaimed loudly, and _taken advantage_ -of those deaths _to prove the danger of employing women_? All England -would have rung of their mismanagement—and the women would have been -ruined!—There are women in London who have laid several thousands, and -yet never lost either a mother or an infant. - -Though the abandoned custom exculpates ladies in the estimation of a -dissipated world, yet I recommend to their confederation _how their -thoughts, during the visits_ of Men-midwives, will stand the test of the -penetrating eye of their Creator. - -I hope to live to see the day, when innate modesty will be the -characteristic of English women; and _of course_, when a lady will not be -more publickly branded with infamy for the most barefaced prostitution, -than for the effrontery which _will then_ be necessary to enable a woman -wantonly to employ - - A MAN-MIDWIFE. - -[3] I would by no means be understood to insinuate the most distant -reflection on Dr. Hunter’s management. I have not the smallest idea -that any of those deaths were in consequence of the least fault in his -execution of his business. I only mentioned them to shew that misfortunes -_may happen_ with the most able Man-midwife; and therefore that it is -cruel to name one or two accidents as proof of a woman’s being unsafe, -since they will happen to the first man in the whole world. I look on Dr. -Hunter as a most skilful anatomist; able physician; experienced, tender, -patient Man-midwife. If it was left to me to call any man to the labour -of a woman in imminent danger, and whose life was linked in mine, Dr. -Hunter is the man I would send for without a moment’s hesitation, his -skill, but, above all, his experience, AGE, and INFIRMITIES, render him -the ONLY man proper to be allowed _to take liberties_ with married women. -Yet _any woman of experience_, in my opinion, is _infinitely safer_ than -even Dr. Hunter, _except in very extraordinary cases_. - - - - -LETTER III. - - -In my two last letters, I believe I satisfied those _who are open to -conviction_, that _even the best_ Men-midwives are _not so safe_ as -women,—and that the custom is destructive of modesty, and affords those -Men-midwives _who chuse it_, finer seraglios than are in the possession -of the most luxuriant Monarchs of the East. - -There are bad consequences attending the practice which I have not -mentioned. It is productive of danger, and of many evils, even when -followed by the most eminent men in London;—who can fix limits then -to its pernicious consequences, when a set of _raw, unskillful young_ -men are turned loose through this town—round its skirts—and over the -whole kingdom, and are received by the credulous multitude with no -other recommendation than the words over the door of “⸺, _Surgeon and -Man-midwife_?” Boys think themselves qualified for Men-midwives, by -having attended one or two courses of lectures under Doctor Hunter,—or, -perhaps, without having heard any lectures at all, or ever having seen a -subject anatomized, start from behind an apothecary’s counter—and begin -their career, murdering of infants without mercy; and with impunity -laying the foundation for cancers, and the most dreadful diseases in -women;—not to mention the chance of their ruining the peace of families, -by introducing vice and discord, where health and harmony might otherwise -have gladdened their serene dwellings.—They know enough of the ways -requisite to use force;⸺they have heard female Midwives blamed for -allowing tedious labours;⸺they think they will be deemed expert, in -proportion _to the quickness_ with which they bring the child into the -world,—and the mischiefs they of course give rise to are innumerable! It -is not in the nature of things possible that _a young man_, ever so well -qualified _by study_, can be _a safe_ Midwife—how dreadful then must the -situations be of those poor women who are in the hands of the numberless -men who practice that business throughout England!⸺The people ignorantly -take for granted _THAT THE SEX constitutes knowledge—insures safety_! -The truth is, _THE SEX alone is sufficient_ to render ANY KNOWLEDGE -destructive in _general_ practice. If the men _must be introduced_ into -_the privacies_ of women, I would earnestly recommend it as _THE MOST -ESSENTIAL qualification_ requisite TO PREPARE them for the study, that -they submit to having their _VOICES made delicate_. - -And here I should have finished my letter, and the subject, if I had not -seen an Essay in the Gazetteer of the 17th, signed “Old Chiron,” which I -cannot avoid making some remarks on, before I conclude. - -The author of it uses tolerable language, and probably could write -pretty well on any other subject. He has done as much as could have -been attempted in order _to continue_ the delusive error which blinds -mankind. He knew he had _not Truth_ on his side—he has therefore -_put words together, without argument_⸺he has boldly denied, what it -is impossible to disprove⸺he has _as_ boldly _asserted WHAT NEVER -HAPPENED_—and then _laughed-off_ facts, trusting _by ridicule_ to conceal -their existence. The pen of _Junius_ could not defend the women who use -men. - -I believe _the thinking_ part of the world will join with me in opinion, -that he would have shewn more wisdom if he had remained silent. A bad -defence does harm to any cause—and _the more able_ the defender appears -in his stile and language, the worse it is for his cause when he -convinces his readers, that even _his abilities_ cannot do it service. -The more this subject is investigated, the more prejudicial it will be -to his profession.[4] A practice, _adopted_, and _continued through a -jumblement_ of IGNORANCE and VICE, can only be favoured by suffering _an -impenetrable_ shade _to veil_ actions _fit only for darkness_. - -Old Chiron has been drove so hard as to have been forced to assert that -the female Midwives always “_cram_ their patients with cordials⸺_keeping -them intoxicated during the time they are in labour_”—and that they -act like infernal fiends, “_driving_ poor women _up and down stairs, -notwithstanding their SHRIEKS_, and _shaking them so violently_ as -often to bring on convulsion fits, on pretence of hastening their -labours⸺laughing at their cries⸺and breaking wretched jests upon the -contortions of the women, whose torments would make a feeling man shudder -at the sight.”⸺I believe that it is not possible any one can be _so -sillily credulous_ as to have faith in these most _shocking, unnatural, -improbable, horrid_ recitals! Is it possible even _if such a brute_ in -an human shame found an entry into an house, that the poor lying-in -woman could _be able_ to be forced “_up and down stairs_?”⸺and _allow -herself_ to be _shook_? If _she_ was ignorant enough, and foolish enough -to consent, _would her relations_⸺_her friends_⸺anxiously attending her, -_likewise be so ignorant_ as not to know _such_ treatment was highly -improper, as well as _cruel beyond cannibal brutality_? And this too -_in England_! where bearing of children is not so very _uncommon_, so -very _extraordinary_ a circumstance, as that a Midwife could find means -to persuade people into such dreadful absurdities!—The idea _is too -ridiculous_! I have seen among my near relations, many women in labour, -as long as it was decent for a man to be present; and declare I have -always seen their Midwives treat them with the utmost tenderness. I have -enquired of several ladies of my acquaintance, each of whom has bore -many children, and always employed women, and they have all declared -they never even _heard_ of any thing in the _most distant_ manner -resembling such treatment, as this _interested_ author has abused his -talents by relating. To vouch falsehoods, and for _the most malignant_ -purposes, needs no comment. Perhaps some diabolical wretch may have -behaved in this manner⸺but is that ground enough to erect defamations -on, against the whole sex? If _such_ proof was to be admitted decisive, -I could severely retaliate on him _such_ proceedings of men, as would -melt an heart of adamant! and I could bring demonstrable evidence -to confirm the authenticity of my relations—but I have already been -called “_indelicate_”—and if I was to write the horrors my pen could -unfold—delineate facts, painting _the indecencies_, and _barbarities_ -of men _whom I could name_, I should _indeed be indelicate_. What must -then the _ACTS have been, which NO LANGUAGE can convey a description -of, without offending the virtuous_, and _shocking_ the _humane_! yet -I should look on myself as very culpable if I had instanced these men -_as standards_ for the whole profession to be judged by. I gave the -preference _to women, NOT because all men WERE BRUTES_, but because _the -greatest Saint_ on earth, _IF a MAN in health_, could not answer for his -principles being proof against the _irresistible temptations arising_ -from being _freely indulged_ in _the most luxurious_ liberties with all -_the feminine_ beauties of lovely women,—and because their knowledge of -anatomy, and their _INSTRUMENTS being ready at hand_, too often _tempt_ -them to use _force_, and do mischief in parts of the most _exquisite_ -sensibility, which _no_ art, _no_ care, _no_ remedy, can _ever_ after -repair; where, if _nature_ had been allowed to do her office, she would -have been _a safe_ operator, and all would have ended happily; and let -any impartial person decide _whether a man_, who knows every method of -forcing the birth, _or a woman_, who is conscious of being _unacquainted_ -with THAT DANGEROUS KNOWLEDGE, _are MOST LIKELY to alter the COURSE OF -NATURE, by interfering_, where she ought to be THE SOLE actor?⸺It is an -indisputable fact, that women have such a peculiar sympathy for females -big with young, that ninety-nine out of an hundred carry it to such an -excess as to be anxious about _brutes_ in that situation. I have often -heard ladies uneasy about mares they have seen with foal, and bitches -with whelp. It is _an instinct_ implanted, and interwoven with their -natures _by the Great Source_ of all things, for the wisest purposes. -Those _who have felt_ the agonies of child birth, surely must be able -to sympathize _more feelingly_ than men who can only form an idea of -them by theory. Women must be allowed to have more tenderness in their -natures than men⸺so that _in every view_ we cannot contest the point -of sensibility with them. Yet this author asserts women are improper -for Midwives because they are _most_ inhuman—because they drive their -fellow-creatures up and down stairs—and shake them into convulsion fits! -did old Chiron write ironically? or did he mean to betray the cause of -the male-practitioners, by asserting fictitious nonsense, which carries -falsehood on it’s face?⸺Let any one _view the forceps_, and then judge -_whether_ it is _a GENTLE INSTRUMENT? it speaks it’s office!_—Let any -one _view the crotchet_, crooked scissars, &c. sharp knives to be sure -are instruments fit to be trusted in every hand! they pursue _healing_ -measures! they never commit _murder_! - -The writer was pleased to confine himself to what I said of the Hottentot -women, because the heat of their climate was adapted to his purpose. I -mentioned likewise “the wilds of America,” and the kingdoms of Scotland -and Ireland. I fancy those countries are cold enough in winter. - -He has quoted the practice of the Athenians as an example for our women. -Though _Heathen virtues_ are great reproaches _on Christian vices_ (I -should have said, on the vices of people who are only _Christians in -name_, by outwardly professing what their lives are daily contradicting) -yet I should imagine _no Heathen impurities_ ought to be admitted -patterns against Christian virtues.—Our surgeons are better anatomists -than the Athenians were; but I am afraid the Athenian men were better -Christians, though they lived before the birth of our Saviour. - -“But the women of quality _do so fall in love_ with their Doctors.”—I -beg he will excuse me,—I _never_ supposed they FELL IN LOVE with THEIR -MALE INSPECTOR. _The sensations_ which _Men-midwives_ give rise to, -_deserve not_ the name which distinguishes _that NOBLE passion OF THE -SOUL_.—_LOVE, allies us to our Divine Original, elevates our ideas to -Heaven, and makes us emulous of worthy actions_! It’s signification -is _scandalously perverted_, when used to describe _the impure_ -gratifications of sense, which degrade us _below the brutes_!—_Love_, -and _Virtue_, are _inseparable_. Love never inspires the human heart, -but when _that heart is in pursuit of virtue_; when _vicious_ purposes -_pollute_ the mind, _it’s end_ is _lust_. - -“Has there ever been related an instance of so unnatural a connexion?” -_Many_ where _it has been attempted_—_several_ where it has _succeeded_. -Any person may buy the trial of Doctor Morley, where they will see that -he was _convicted_, and _fined a thousand pounds_, for seducing Mrs. -Biker. The poor woman accused the Doctor on her death-bed, and told -the whole transaction. The Doctor pleaded to his friends “_the strength -of the temptation, the frailty of nature_; and the impossibility of -any man’s _resisting such powerful charms_.” He quitted his business; -_the ladies_, however, _approved his conduct_,—it _RECOMMENDED him TO -THEIR FAVOUR_, and _he was more employed than ever_! Doctor ⸺ was forced -to feign madness to escape the rage of an injured husband, for having -frightened his wife to death! She happened to be _a virtuous_, though -_NOT a MODEST_, woman!—Count STRUENZY too was a Man-midwife.—Would he -ever have dared to lift his eye, or breathe his infamous passion to a ⸺, -if he had not been encouraged and _familiarized_ by the freedoms admitted -by the profession of a Man-midwife? Certainly no. Whoever reads the -news-papers of three years back, will find many paragraphs informing us -of prosecutions of Men-midwives for crim. con. - -“A man _never_ seen by them _but in their distress_, is sure most -unlikely to become an object _of their desire_; nor can the ladies, -however lovely in the bloom of health, be supposed _capable of retaining_ -their attractions _in the hour of agony_.”—The writer knows that neither -of these assertions are matters of fact. In regard to the first, _many -women_ see their Men-midwives _in perfect health, to be informed if they -are with child? How far gone?_ “Whether the child lies right?” and on -many other PRETENCES.—Men and women, on _such trying_ occasions, _must -give way to NATURE—there is no possibility of withstanding it_.—As to -women’s _not_ being “_attractingly lovely_ when in labour,”—there he -likewise must have been sensible that he erred from truth. Those pains -_rather add_ to beauty; and though, _during the continuance of racking -tortures, neither_ party can attend to any thing but the pains felt on -one side, and the compassion which a good man must sympathize in on the -other; yet _in the intervals_ (many there _always_ are, and _generally_ -they are _long intervals_) _no uneasiness on either side_ leaves the -minds _of both_ at liberty to entertain _other IDEAS_. - -“And if he” (the Man-midwife) “is at all to answer for their conduct, is, -I think, only to be reckoned with _FOR RECOVERING THEM so early_, and _SO -PUTTING IT IN THEIR POWER TO go abroad_ and _COQUET IT the sooner_.”—The -author is pleased to be _facetious with the ladies_! I do not at all -wonder that _those men_ who have _such foundation_ for censuring their -conduct, _presume thus_ to ridicule them for their eagerness to visit, -in order to _receive the homage_ of their _criminal admirers_! I should -have thought, however, that the subject was not of a nature which could -authorize such indecent raillery. It verifies the old proverb, “_too much -familiarity breeds contempt_.” - -As to the assertion, that “the faculty employ men to their own wives”—I -know very many instances to the contrary—and even _if this was -otherwise_, it would be by no means conclusive. Men who have _such -choice_ of fine women _to take the most licentious liberties_ with, -most probably cannot remain long faithful to their own wives—they may -therefore easily be supposed soon to become so indifferent about them, -as to be very ready to suffer their own brethren to lay them, _by way -of KEEPING UP THE FARCE_, and _blinding the world_. I take for granted -however they permit _no private examinations_. They are too much in the -secret. - -The gentleman concludes with telling us a story of Dr. Ford’s having -attended a poor woman for three days and nights, who had been ill used -by a woman.⸺What then?—It only proves that Dr. Ford _is not destitute of -humanity_, and _that there is ONE_ woman _who interfered with nature_, -and _of course did mischief_.—I know he “is a favourite with many women -of distinction”—but _those ladies BEST know HOW he has recommended -himself to their favour_. Neither Dr. Ford, nor Dr. Hunter, can presume -to affirm, that they never take the most intimate freedoms with ladies, -when there is no chance for labour.⸺Indeed, the ladies make no secret -of it—they now can submit to those examinations on the morning of an -assembly, tell their company of it at dinner, and go to a tavern to -supper! - -And now, Mr. Printer, allow me _to take my leave of you, and the public -on this theme_.—The unprejudiced will be convinced—at least it was -this flattering, this most pleasing hope, that stimulated me to write -on this subject.—I can have no sinister views—the conduct of the world -will not interfere with my happiness—for I never will marry any woman, -unless I know her sentiments correspond with mine. The public are now in -possession of all I can think on the subject—The good sense of the people -of England will decide how far my hints may conduce to their domestic -happiness.—I leave _to other pens_ to proceed on it, _in answer to any -writer who may enter the lists against me_. Whoever wishes to know my -sentiments may review these three letters. I should be an hypocrite, if -I attempted to conceal, that, as I took up my pen _for the benefit of -the community_, so I shall be _most highly gratified_, if I hereafter -find my time has been employed to purpose, in _opening the eyes of the -thoughtless_, _informing the ignorant_, and _warning the virtuous_. I -despair of shaming the immodest! - -While I live, I shall think NO WOMAN MODEST who employs - - A MAN-MIDWIFE. - -[4] I take for granted, Old Chiron is a Man-midwife. - - - - -APPENDIX. - - -As I do not wish to bewilder the Judgments of my Readers, but to convince -their Understandings,—and as I have, throughout my Letters, laid so much -Weight on the Dangers which attend hurrying the Labours of Women, I -cannot dismiss this Pamphlet into the World without endeavouring _clearly -to demonstrate_ the Utility of allowing Nature _to adhere strictly_ to -_her own_ Period for accomplishing the Birth. - -Men, who have _not_ been _accustomed to thinking_;—but whose Lives have -been spent in the various Occupations, or dissipated Pleasures of the -World, by having been habituated daily to view the common round which -Providence takes in the natural Events of Life, never felt their Wonder -and Admiration excited by considering them in the Manner which is -incumbent on reasonable, intelligent Beings. Those, on the other Hand, -whose only _real_ Enjoyments proceed from a delightful Indulgement of -the Soul in Contemplations on the astonishing Works of God, _divest_ -themselves of _that Familiarity to them_ which the hourly Evidence of -their Senses would otherwise have obscured—and render’d Matter for no -rational Reflection. - -Thus we are blind to the surprizing _progressive_ Change, which enlarges -a new born Infant, to the size of Manhood! or a small Seed, to a large -Tree!—If an Infant, _the day after its Birth_, was to walk round the -Town, in compleat symmetry of Person, and six Feet high, would not -the Miracle forcibly strike the Minds of the most thoughtless of our -Species?—The difference is made only _by Custom_. Twenty Hours, and -Twenty Years, are exactly the same in the Sight of God!—_My_ Amazement -is excited by seeing the Change wrought _in twenty Years_, to the full -in _as high a degree_, as the _same Sight_, in twenty _Hours_, would -raise the Astonishment of an embroidered Maccaroni at Carlisle House, -or, of an infinitely _more_ rational, esteemable Being; a poor, ignorant -Labourer in the Fields! - -The Work of Nature, _in Labour_, is one of it’s most extraordinary -Acts!—Untill the Parts are _in some degree prepared_ by the miraculous -Change effected in them _by the Labour Pains_, the Child could no more -enter the World than it could fly into the Clouds!—Untill the Parts are -_properly_ prepared, the Child cannot appear without _the most obvious_ -Danger. - -Every Pain has it’s Office,—it lubricates—it dilates. Where these Pains -are _not_ violent—are _not_ quick in their Return—but are lingering, -and tedious, they _plainly_ indicate that _the Woman requires great -Preparation_—Nature is _gradually_, and by _the most gentle_ Means, -forwarding _the Distension_—and if left _to herself_, will _not_ bring on -the Birth till every thing _is accommodated to her Purpose_. - -Men Midwives, seldom wait for Nature’s Moment. Women are objected to, -because they are tedious—Men are extolled for their quickness. If -Doctor ⸺ has two or three pregnant Ladies waiting, from whom he expects -handsome Payments, he will _take Merit_ from hastening the Birth—and if -any Accident happens from his Impatience, his Reputation is too well -establish’d to suffer in the Eyes of Mankind—and the Misfortune is -attributed to some of the common Casualties attending Labour, when it -derived it’s Source _solely_ from the Doctor’s having brought the Child -forward, _unnaturally_, before the Parts were pre-disposed, by a proper -distension, for it’s Reception, and Passage. I fear two Ladies died -lately owing to this very Practice. The Parts inflamed—the Inflammation -spread by Sympathy—the Bowels mortified. If these Ladies had lain-in in -the Country, and had employ’d common, plain Women, who pretended to no -Knowledge but what they derived from Experience, it is a Million to one -that the Ladies would now have been alive and well. - -The Men-midwives not only give rise to Inflammations by bringing the -Child before the Woman has felt _half the number of Pains_ which Nature -intended _to predispose_ the Parts—but likewise by _their abominable -Dilatations_. Can any Practice be more repugnant to common Sense, -than that of irritating the exquisitely sensitive nervous Fibres -of those Parts, by way of preparing them for Distension? The Men -absolutely _counteract_ the very end they pretend to have in view, by -Dilatation!—Friction must irritate—irritation must inflame—Inflammation -must _contract_. It is no Wonder if Parts so nicely constructed—highly -irritated for (perhaps) Hours, should inflame after the Birth, and be -productive of the most dreadful Consequences!—Yet their _Officiousness_ -recommends them to the Ladies!—I really cannot find Words to inform my -Readers of every Circumstance I wish to relate. I start Hints—and leave -them to pursue the Subject by an exertion of their own Reason. - -I have now entirely done with all which relates to the Danger Women and -Children run through _officious_, shameful _Impatience_. I have only -to recommend one serious Reflection to those Husbands who think their -Happiness would be interrupted by detecting any Infidelity in their -Wives. I beg they will consider _the Advantages_ they give Men-midwives, -in allowing them so many _favourable_ Opportunities of _extolling the -personal_ Charms of the Ladies, _whose Beauties_ lie open to their -_most curious_ Researches. No Men can possibly have _such critical_ -Opportunities for engratiating themselves with the Fair. _Flattery, -CRITICALLY applied_ to Women, has strange Effects. They can _accompany_ -their Flattery with _irresistible_ Persuasives. The sacred Names of -Religion and Honour _may_ be made _Subservient_ to their Purposes. The -more they are pretended to be prized in their Estimation, the more _they -may be urged in proof_ of the _bewitching_ Allurements, and _forcible_ -Power of those hidden Beauties, which have obliterated every Remonstrance -of Virtue, and stifled every Check of Conscience. The poor Woman’s -_Pity_ is excited, when she views the strongest Principles of her “dear -Man” overcome by _her_ Charms—she can only blame _herself_ for possessing -_such provoking Temptations_—she is blinded by the Assistance of -Nature—_her own Vanity_ turns Advocate for the Doctor, and acquits him of -Villainy _during the Empire of Passion_; though the _return_ of Reason, -_when too late_! discovers the Artifices which have accomplish’d her Ruin! - - THE AUTHOR. - -I hope Doctor Hunter will pardon _the latter_ part of the Reference, -at the bottom of my second Letter. I fear I misrepresented him in -attributing Infirmities to his share which I am inform’d he never yet has -experienced. His _Abilities_ are great—and if a Man _must_ be employ’d, -I think he may be called in with as much safety as any Man of his -Profession. - -☞ _As this Pamphlet recommends the employing of Women, the Publishers -have taken some Pains to procure a List of those who are eminent in their -Profession—and on the best information recommend the following Midwives -to those Ladies who have too much Modesty to employ Men—and who are -convinced by the preceding Pages that the Men are not so safe as Women._ - - Mrs. Nihell _Hay Market_ - - Mrs. Brooke } _Cross Key Court, Little Britain_ - Mrs. Stephens } - Mrs. Lee } - - Mrs. Harris _Mould Makers Row, St. Martin’s Le Grand_ - - Mrs. Reynard } _Bartholomew Close_ - Mrs. Forrest } - - Mrs. Smith } _Cow Lane, Snow-Hill_ - Mrs. Page } - - Mrs. Phillips _Garlick Hill_ - - Mrs. Andrews _Bush Lane, Cannon Street_ - - Mrs. Longbottom _Near Guy’s Hospital_ - - Mrs. Richardson _Westminster_ - - Mrs. Souden _Ratcliff Row, Old Street_ - - Mrs. Hall _Bunhill Row, Ditto_ - - Mrs. Barnet } _Somerset Street, White-Chapel_ - Mrs. Larkin } - - Mrs. Blunt _Swallow Str. Golden Sq._ - - Mrs. Lyttelton, _Amen-Corner, Paternoster Row_ - - -FINIS. - -*** END OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE DANGER AND IMMODESTY OF THE -PRESENT TOO GENERAL CUSTOM OF UNNECESSARILY EMPLOYING -MEN-MIDWIVES. *** - -Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions will -be renamed. - -Creating the works from print editions not protected by U.S. copyright -law means that no one owns a United States copyright in these works, -so the Foundation (and you!) can copy and distribute it in the -United States without permission and without paying copyright -royalties. Special rules, set forth in the General Terms of Use part -of this license, apply to copying and distributing Project -Gutenberg-tm electronic works to protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm -concept and trademark. Project Gutenberg is a registered trademark, -and may not be used if you charge for an eBook, except by following -the terms of the trademark license, including paying royalties for use -of the Project Gutenberg trademark. If you do not charge anything for -copies of this eBook, complying with the trademark license is very -easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose such as creation -of derivative works, reports, performances and research. Project -Gutenberg eBooks may be modified and printed and given away--you may -do practically ANYTHING in the United States with eBooks not protected -by U.S. copyright law. Redistribution is subject to the trademark -license, especially commercial redistribution. - -START: FULL LICENSE - -THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE -PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK - -To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free -distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work -(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project -Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full -Project Gutenberg-tm License available with this file or online at -www.gutenberg.org/license. - -Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project -Gutenberg-tm electronic works - -1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm -electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to -and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property -(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all -the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or -destroy all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your -possession. If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a -Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound -by the terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the -person or entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph -1.E.8. - -1.B. "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark. It may only be -used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who -agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few -things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works -even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See -paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project -Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this -agreement and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm -electronic works. See paragraph 1.E below. - -1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the -Foundation" or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection -of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works. Nearly all the individual -works in the collection are in the public domain in the United -States. If an individual work is unprotected by copyright law in the -United States and you are located in the United States, we do not -claim a right to prevent you from copying, distributing, performing, -displaying or creating derivative works based on the work as long as -all references to Project Gutenberg are removed. Of course, we hope -that you will support the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting -free access to electronic works by freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm -works in compliance with the terms of this agreement for keeping the -Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with the work. You can easily -comply with the terms of this agreement by keeping this work in the -same format with its attached full Project Gutenberg-tm License when -you share it without charge with others. - -1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern -what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are -in a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States, -check the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this -agreement before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, -distributing or creating derivative works based on this work or any -other Project Gutenberg-tm work. The Foundation makes no -representations concerning the copyright status of any work in any -country other than the United States. - -1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg: - -1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other -immediate access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear -prominently whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work -on which the phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the -phrase "Project Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed, -performed, viewed, copied or distributed: - - This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States and - most other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no - restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it - under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included with this - eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org. If you are not located in the - United States, you will have to check the laws of the country where - you are located before using this eBook. - -1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is -derived from texts not protected by U.S. copyright law (does not -contain a notice indicating that it is posted with permission of the -copyright holder), the work can be copied and distributed to anyone in -the United States without paying any fees or charges. If you are -redistributing or providing access to a work with the phrase "Project -Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the work, you must comply -either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 or -obtain permission for the use of the work and the Project Gutenberg-tm -trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or 1.E.9. - -1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted -with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution -must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any -additional terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms -will be linked to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works -posted with the permission of the copyright holder found at the -beginning of this work. - -1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm -License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this -work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm. - -1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this -electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without -prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with -active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project -Gutenberg-tm License. - -1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary, -compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including -any word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access -to or distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format -other than "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official -version posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm website -(www.gutenberg.org), you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense -to the user, provide a copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means -of obtaining a copy upon request, of the work in its original "Plain -Vanilla ASCII" or other form. Any alternate format must include the -full Project Gutenberg-tm License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1. - -1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying, -performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works -unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9. - -1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing -access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works -provided that: - -* You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from - the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method - you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is owed - to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he has - agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the Project - Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments must be paid - within 60 days following each date on which you prepare (or are - legally required to prepare) your periodic tax returns. Royalty - payments should be clearly marked as such and sent to the Project - Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the address specified in - Section 4, "Information about donations to the Project Gutenberg - Literary Archive Foundation." - -* You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies - you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he - does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm - License. You must require such a user to return or destroy all - copies of the works possessed in a physical medium and discontinue - all use of and all access to other copies of Project Gutenberg-tm - works. - -* You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of - any money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the - electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days of - receipt of the work. - -* You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free - distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works. - -1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project -Gutenberg-tm electronic work or group of works on different terms than -are set forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing -from the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the manager of -the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark. Contact the Foundation as set -forth in Section 3 below. - -1.F. - -1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable -effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread -works not protected by U.S. copyright law in creating the Project -Gutenberg-tm collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm -electronic works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may -contain "Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate -or corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other -intellectual property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or -other medium, a computer virus, or computer codes that damage or -cannot be read by your equipment. - -1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right -of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project -Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project -Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project -Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all -liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal -fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT -LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE -PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE -TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE -LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR -INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH -DAMAGE. - -1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a -defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can -receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a -written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you -received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium -with your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you -with the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in -lieu of a refund. If you received the work electronically, the person -or entity providing it to you may choose to give you a second -opportunity to receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If -the second copy is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing -without further opportunities to fix the problem. - -1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth -in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS', WITH NO -OTHER WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT -LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE. - -1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied -warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of -damages. If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement -violates the law of the state applicable to this agreement, the -agreement shall be interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or -limitation permitted by the applicable state law. The invalidity or -unenforceability of any provision of this agreement shall not void the -remaining provisions. - -1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the -trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone -providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in -accordance with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the -production, promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm -electronic works, harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, -including legal fees, that arise directly or indirectly from any of -the following which you do or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this -or any Project Gutenberg-tm work, (b) alteration, modification, or -additions or deletions to any Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any -Defect you cause. - -Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm - -Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of -electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of -computers including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It -exists because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations -from people in all walks of life. - -Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the -assistance they need are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's -goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will -remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project -Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure -and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future -generations. To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary -Archive Foundation and how your efforts and donations can help, see -Sections 3 and 4 and the Foundation information page at -www.gutenberg.org - -Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary -Archive Foundation - -The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non-profit -501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the -state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal -Revenue Service. The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification -number is 64-6221541. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg Literary -Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent permitted by -U.S. federal laws and your state's laws. - -The Foundation's business office is located at 809 North 1500 West, -Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887. Email contact links and up -to date contact information can be found at the Foundation's website -and official page at www.gutenberg.org/contact - -Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg -Literary Archive Foundation - -Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without -widespread public support and donations to carry out its mission of -increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be -freely distributed in machine-readable form accessible by the widest -array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations -($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt -status with the IRS. - -The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating -charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United -States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a -considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up -with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations -where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To SEND -DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any particular -state visit www.gutenberg.org/donate - -While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we -have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition -against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who -approach us with offers to donate. - -International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make -any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from -outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff. - -Please check the Project Gutenberg web pages for current donation -methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other -ways including checks, online payments and credit card donations. To -donate, please visit: www.gutenberg.org/donate - -Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works - -Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project -Gutenberg-tm concept of a library of electronic works that could be -freely shared with anyone. For forty years, he produced and -distributed Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of -volunteer support. - -Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed -editions, all of which are confirmed as not protected by copyright in -the U.S. unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not -necessarily keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper -edition. - -Most people start at our website which has the main PG search -facility: www.gutenberg.org - -This website includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm, -including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary -Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to -subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks. diff --git a/old/68756-0.zip b/old/68756-0.zip Binary files differdeleted file mode 100644 index ea9966e..0000000 --- a/old/68756-0.zip +++ /dev/null diff --git a/old/68756-h.zip b/old/68756-h.zip Binary files differdeleted file mode 100644 index dd938fc..0000000 --- a/old/68756-h.zip +++ /dev/null diff --git a/old/68756-h/68756-h.htm b/old/68756-h/68756-h.htm deleted file mode 100644 index 7179099..0000000 --- a/old/68756-h/68756-h.htm +++ /dev/null @@ -1,2524 +0,0 @@ -<!DOCTYPE html> -<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en" lang="en"> - <head> - <meta charset="UTF-8" /> - <title> - The Project Gutenberg eBook of The danger and immodesty of the present too general custom of unnecessarily employing men-midwives, by Anonymous. - </title> - - <link rel="icon" href="images/cover.jpg" type="image/x-cover" /> - - <style> /* <![CDATA[ */ - -a { - text-decoration: none; -} - -body { - margin-left: 10%; - margin-right: 10%; -} - -h1,h2 { - text-align: center; - clear: both; -} - -h2.nobreak { - page-break-before: avoid; -} - -hr.chap { - margin-top: 2em; - margin-bottom: 2em; - clear: both; - width: 65%; - margin-left: 17.5%; - margin-right: 17.5%; -} - -div.chapter { - page-break-before: always; -} - -p { - margin-top: 0.5em; - text-align: justify; - margin-bottom: 0.5em; - text-indent: 1em; -} - -table { - margin: 1em auto 1em auto; - max-width: 40em; - border-collapse: collapse; -} - -td { - padding-left: 2.25em; - padding-right: 0.25em; - vertical-align: top; - text-indent: -2em; -} - -.row td { - padding-top: 0.75em; -} - -td.valign { - vertical-align: middle; -} - -.center { - text-align: center; - text-indent: 0em; -} - -.footnotes { - margin-top: 1em; - border: dashed 1px; -} - -.footnote { - margin-left: 10%; - margin-right: 10%; - font-size: 0.9em; -} - -.footnote .label { - position: absolute; - right: 84%; - text-align: right; -} - -.fnanchor { - vertical-align: super; - font-size: .8em; - text-decoration: none; -} - -.gesperrt { - letter-spacing: 0.2em; - margin-right: -0.2em; -} - -.larger { - font-size: 150%; -} - -.pagenum { - position: absolute; - right: 4%; - font-size: smaller; - text-align: right; - font-style: normal; -} - -.right { - text-align: right; -} - -.smaller { - font-size: 80%; -} - -.smcap { - font-variant: small-caps; - font-style: normal; -} - -.titlepage { - text-align: center; - margin-top: 1em; - text-indent: 0em; - line-height: 1.8em; -} - -.x-ebookmaker .gesperrt { - margin-right: 0; - letter-spacing: 0; -} - /* ]]> */ </style> - </head> -<body> -<p style='text-align:center; font-size:1.2em; font-weight:bold'>The Project Gutenberg eBook of The danger and immodesty of the present too general custom of unnecessarily employing men-midwives., by Anonymous</p> -<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> -This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States and -most other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no restrictions -whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms -of the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online -at <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org">www.gutenberg.org</a>. If you -are not located in the United States, you will have to check the laws of the -country where you are located before using this eBook. -</div> - -<p style='display:block; margin-top:1em; margin-bottom:1em; margin-left:2em; text-indent:-2em'>Title: The danger and immodesty of the present too general custom of unnecessarily employing men-midwives.</p> -<p style='display:block; margin-top:1em; margin-bottom:0; margin-left:2em; text-indent:-2em'>Author: Anonymous</p> -<p style='display:block; text-indent:0; margin:1em 0'>Release Date: August 15, 2022 [eBook #68756]</p> -<p style='display:block; text-indent:0; margin:1em 0'>Language: English</p> - <p style='display:block; margin-top:1em; margin-bottom:0; margin-left:2em; text-indent:-2em; text-align:left'>Produced by: deaurider and the Online Distributed Proofreading Team at https://www.pgdp.net (This file was produced from images generously made available by The Internet Archive)</p> -<div style='margin-top:2em; margin-bottom:4em'>*** START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE DANGER AND IMMODESTY OF THE PRESENT TOO GENERAL CUSTOM OF UNNECESSARILY EMPLOYING MEN-MIDWIVES. ***</div> - -<p class="titlepage"><span class="smaller gesperrt">THE</span><br /> -<span class="smcap larger">DANGER and IMMODESTY</span><br /> -<span class="smaller gesperrt">OF</span><br /> -<i>The Present too general Custom of</i><br /> -<span class="larger">UNNECESSARILY EMPLOYING<br /> -<span class="gesperrt">MEN-MIDWIVES</span>.</span></p> - -<p class="titlepage"><span class="smaller gesperrt">BEING</span><br /> -The Letters which lately appeared under<br /> -the Signature of<br /> -<span class="gesperrt">A MAN-MIDWIFE</span>.</p> - -<p class="titlepage"><span class="smaller gesperrt">WITH AN</span><br /> -<span class="gesperrt larger">INTRODUCTION</span>,<br /> -<span class="smcap">A TREATISE on the MILK</span>,<br /> -<span class="smaller">AND AN</span><br /> -<span class="gesperrt larger">APPENDIX</span>.</p> - -<p class="titlepage"><span class="gesperrt">WITH CORRECTIONS</span><br /> -By the <span class="gesperrt">AUTHOR</span>.</p> - -<p class="center"><span class="gesperrt">LONDON</span>:<br /> -<span class="smaller">Printed for <span class="smcap">J. Wilkie</span>, No. 71, in St. Paul’s Church-Yard;<br /> -and <span class="smcap">F. Blyth</span>, John’s Coffee-House, Cornhill.<br /> -MDCCLXXII.</span></p> - -<hr class="chap x-ebookmaker-drop" /> - -<div class="chapter"> - -<p><span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_1"></a>[1]</span></p> - -<h2 class="nobreak"><span class="smaller">AN</span><br /> -<span class="gesperrt">INTRODUCTION</span><br /> -<span class="smaller"><span class="smaller">AND</span><br /> -<span class="smcap">ADVICE to the LADIES</span>,<br /> -<span class="gesperrt">POINTING OUT</span><br /> -<span class="smaller"><i>The <span class="smcap">dangers</span> attending <span class="smcap">backening</span> their<br /> -<span class="smcap">milk</span> the first four or five Weeks after<br /> -Delivery.</i></span></span></h2> - -</div> - -<p class="center larger">To the <span class="gesperrt">PUBLIC</span>.</p> - -<p>I have very long been convinced of -the many dangerous Consequences -which attend the depraved Custom of employing -Men-midwives unnecessarily—and -have been for some Years intending -from Month to Month to write my Ideas -on that Subject, in order to combat the -very destructive Practice, and endeavour -to awaken the slumbering good Sense of the -Nation. But when I reflected on the great -Difficulty of conquering Prejudice—considered<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_2"></a>[2]</span> -how generally the Opinion had been -adopted that “Men were the most proper -Attendants on the Labours of Women,” -I confess the Task appeared too -arduous—and I was discouraged.</p> - -<p>I knew, that <i>no</i> Arguments, <i>even if an -Angel was to descend from Heaven to utter -them</i>, could persuade the Ladies <i>to be satisfied</i> -with Midwives of <i>their own</i> Sex, -<i>after the fine Polish</i> had been <i>once</i> -RUB’D OFF which <i>modesty ought</i> -to have <i>work’d up</i> to such a <i>bright</i> Pitch of -<i>high finish’d</i> Excellence, as <i>not</i> to have been -capable of admitting the impure stain -within the glossy smoothness of its beautiful -enamel!—I knew, that, assisted by -the greatest Part of the Faculty (whose <i><span class="smcap">interest</span>, -as well as <span class="smcap">pleasure</span></i> would be -at <span class="smcap">stake</span>) they would leave <i>no means</i> untried—they -would call in <i>every fallacious</i> -art to their aid, <i>to continue <span class="smcap">the deception</span></i>, -by <i>ridiculing</i> Arguments which they -<i>could not confute</i>—and that <i>un</i>married Ladies, -through <i>an Opinion</i> of the <i>Virtue of -their Friends</i>, and swayed, and <i>kept in -Countenance</i>, by <i>the prevalent</i> Custom of<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_3"></a>[3]</span> -the Times, would naturally <i>fall into the -Stream</i>, and <i>not</i> be undeceived until <i>too -far hurried by the Current</i> to be <i>afterwards</i> -able to recede.—On the other Hand, I -likewise knew that our young Men <i>of Fashion</i> -had <i>long ago</i> resolved <i>to bid Adieu <span class="smcap">to -thinking</span></i>. Leaving <i>that troublesome</i> Employment -<i>to others</i>, they were intent on -pursuing the far nobler Gratifications <i>of -Sense</i>—endeavouring to bury in a round -of <i>trifling</i> Dissipations, <i>every</i> Sentiment -meriting the Attention of <i>reasonable</i> Beings -that an Attempt to work on <i>such</i> Minds -would be Absurdity in the extreme,—for, -that, even <i>if they were convinced</i> of the two -uncontrovertable Truths I wish to establish, -by being satisfied that Men were -<i>not</i> so safe as Women, and that Men-midwives -polluted the Minds of their Wives, -and rendered them easy Preys to Seduction, -yet these Sentiments would have had <i>no</i> -Weight <i>with them</i>, because they married -without Love, Religion, Principle—<i>the -only</i> Ingredients capable of forming <i>national</i> -Happiness. <i>Impure</i> in their <i>Souls, debauch’d</i> -in their <i>Persons</i>, Libertinism opened<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_4"></a>[4]</span> -<i>the only Avenue</i> which could present -them with a Prospect of Enjoyments <i>adapted -to their</i> Sensations—<i>their</i> Joys were -independent of their Wive’s Society—their -Healths consequently were only <i>politely</i> -wish’d for—and they would of course -readily <i>risk</i> their Wive’s Purity being contaminated, -rather than <i>be disappointed</i> in -the Pleasure of seducing the Wives <i>of their -acquaintance</i>, through the <i>preparatory</i> Assistance -of the <i>Men</i>-midwives. The Happiness -of our gay young Men <i>not</i> being -centered within the narrow Circle of -Home, <i>the Virtue</i> of their Wives is not -in the least essential, has no Weight, <i>when -ballanced</i> with <i>the Advantages</i> they derive -from the too <i>general</i> Prostitution of the -Sex. They <i>extract Balm</i> from <i>the Vices</i> of -<i>Other</i> Women, which has sovereign Efficacy -<i>in healing</i> any Wounds—<i>alleviating</i> any -smarts, which they may receive, or feel, -from the infidelity of <i>their own</i> Wives—whom -they never treated as their <i>rational -Companions</i>, whose Affections they were -desirous of fixing irremoveably,—but as -<i>necessary</i> Beings to do the Honours of<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_5"></a>[5]</span> -their Tables—furnish Heirs—and save -their Estates from being encumbered with -the Payment of the Fortunes of their -younger Brothers and Sisters. The only -View on <i>one</i> side, is <i>Money</i>—on the <i>other</i>, -<i>Quality</i>—<i>each</i> having attain’d the <i>only</i> Object -<i>they aim’d at in Marriage</i>,—each, without -any fundamental Principle of Goodness, -to restrain their Pursuits within the -Bounds of Virtue, they throw off the -Mask of Decency—and riot in Vice!—Our -young Men think the Scriptures fit -only to impose on Weakness. The Injunctions -of the Gospel interfere with their -Enjoyments—and having never believed -it’s sacred Truths—or endeavoured to follow -it’s amiable Precepts, they never experienced -the serene Tranquillity arising -from the delightful Possession of an approving -Conscience. At the best, <i>forgetful</i> -even of the Existence of a God—and -laughing at the idle supposition of a -future state, they give the Reins without -Controul to all their Appetites and Passions—check’d -by nothing but what <i>they<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_6"></a>[6]</span> -term <span class="smcap">honour</span></i>. But <i><span class="smcap">their</span> Honour</i> is comprised, -in—<i>punishing the Man with <span class="smcap">murder</span> -who dares to doubt</i> their veracity, or -fail in Respect to their Dignity—and in -paying their Debts <i>to <span class="smcap">sharpers</span></i>, instead -of rewarding the Industry of their Tradesmen, -by giving them—<i>their own Property</i>. -<i><span class="smcap">Their</span> Honour</i> does not restrain -them from defiling the Beds <i>of their -Friends</i>—<i><span class="smcap">breaking</span> Promises</i> to <i><span class="smcap">worthy</span> -Dependants</i>—or <i>betraying</i> the Interests and -Honour of their Country for <i>base Wages of -Iniquity</i>, though committed with Confidence -to their Charge, <i>yet sacrificed</i> without -Remorse, for their <i>private</i> Emolument. -<i><span class="smcap">Their</span> Honour</i> enforces <i>no single -Virtue</i>!—<span class="smcap">away with such honour!</span></p> - -<p>I next consider’d the number of <i>well-disposed</i> -Men, who <i>through Prejudice</i> might -<i>neglect</i>; or through Indolence, or Weakness -of Understanding, be blind to the -Force of my Arguments, and of course -remain unconvinced by them—and these -Obstacles, united, appeared too formidable -to be surmounted by any weak Effort<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_7"></a>[7]</span> -I could make through the Channel of a News -Paper. At last however I took Courage -and submitted my Sentiments to the Consideration -of the Public, in the Gazetteer -of the 28th of March.</p> - -<p>I had not, at that time, any Intention -of writing another Letter,—but deriving -Hopes from the favourable Impression my -first seem’d to have made on the Minds of -the Considerate—and having heard weight -laid on <i>the Men’s Knowledge of Anatomy</i> as -a Reason why <i>they</i> should <i>be safer</i> than -Women, I wrote the second Letter to remove -<i>that specious</i>, but <i>mistaken</i> Idea—and -having <i>known</i> some, and heard of <i>many</i> -other young Men Midwives, who really -<i>are ignorant</i> of that Knowledge of Anatomy -which is <i>their only</i> Recommendation <i>to <span class="smcap">infatuated</span> -Husbands</i>;—and a Man Midwife, -under the Signature of “Old Chiron,” -having endeavoured to abuse the -World with the most scandalous misrepresentations, -and <i>gross Fallacies</i>, my last -Letter appeared to expose the Danger of -employing raw young Men—or believing -such <i>interested Deceivers</i>.</p> - -<p><span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_8"></a>[8]</span></p> - -<p>I am quite indifferent about the Offence -which my Letters have given <i>the Ladies of -Fashion</i>, and their <i>darling</i> Doctors—<i>their -“sweet Men.”</i> They are conscious my -Letters convey only <i>a very faint</i> Sketch of -their <i>immodest, obscene practices</i>. They are -<i>too bad</i> to be <i>exactly</i> described without -using Language very unfit for the Inspection -of virtuous Women!—I place dreadful -Rocks in their View, to warn them -from a Course on which their Purity -would be irretrievably wreck’d: and surely -those Parents entertain <i>strange</i> Notions -of <i>Virtue</i>, who carefully keep my Letters -out of the way of their Daughters, through -what <i>they imagine to be</i> “Delicacy!”—they -would rather, in short, have them <i>polluted -in future—past redemption</i>—than instructed -by my friendly Admonitions, how -to avoid the Path to Vice!—the modest, -amiable, worthy, <i>sensible</i> Part of the Community, -I am confident, will read my -Pamphlet with Candour—approve of the -Sentiments contain’d in it—and recommend -it to the Perusal of others. I shall<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_9"></a>[9]</span> -view the Censures, and Displeasure of <i>the -vicious</i>, and the <i>dissipated</i>, as the highest -Eulogiums;—as Praise—which will convey -<i>the most genial warmth</i> to my Heart—and, -I trust, afford me a pleasing Retrospect -in my <i>latest</i> Hours!—</p> - -<p>My Letters having succeeded beyond -my most sanguine Expectation, I am now -encouraged to attack <i>another</i> prevailing -Custom among the Fair—that of <i>not</i> giving -suck to their Infants, at least during -the first five or six weeks.</p> - -<p>I shall wave considering <i>the Propriety</i> of -a Mother’s giving suck through a Sense of -the <i>incumbent Duty</i> she <i>owes</i> her child.—Though -the Custom of backening the -Milk is <i>unnatural</i>, dangerous, and too often -<i>fatal</i>, I shall lay no stress on the former, -but rest it entirely on the latter—for -in <i>such</i> an Age as the present, in which -our fine Ladies have few Ideas of any Religion—are -not capable of receiving Pleasure -from <i>domestick</i> Employments—would -infinitely rather <span class="smcap">converse</span> with <i>any Men</i> -than their <i>Husbands</i>—leave their Children<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_10"></a>[10]</span> -to be instructed, or <i>neglected</i> by Servants, -and fly abroad, with eager Impatience <i>to -game away</i> their Husbands Fortunes, and -receive the <i>criminal</i> Addresses of <i>their profligate</i> -Admirers, at the Assembly, the -Masquerade, or more <i>commodious Apartments</i> -of <i>the Coterie</i>—laughing at the Censures -of <i>the few</i> who have still some -Regard to Decorum—and despising the -Belief of the perpetual Presence of a -Being who is Witness to all their <i>secret -vicious Deformities</i>—in <i>such</i> times it would -be Folly to mention the Dangers they expose -their Infants to, from diseased Milk, -want of a tender Mother’s Care—or dream -of asking them how they will answer to -the Almighty for <i>not</i> having afforded them -the Nourishment He kindly provided for -their Support?—I shall therefore only -shew the Absurdity and <i>danger</i> of this -Custom, as far as it regards the Health -of <i>the Mother</i>.</p> - -<p>And here I must endeavour to give my -Readers some Idea of that part of the human -Body which is concern’d in the<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_11"></a>[11]</span> -formation, and absorbtion of the Milk, -in order for their understanding the -Force of my arguments.</p> - -<p>Our Bodies are constantly, when in -Health, receiving Repairs in all their -Parts, from millions of the smallest, -most minute Arteries. Every Solid, and -every Juice, is form’d out of, and secreted -from, Blood. Those noxious -Parts of the Blood which are not proper -for these different, <i>opposite</i> Uses, are thrown -off by insensible Perspiration. When, -through various Causes, that Perspiration -is obstructed, the acrid Matter which -ought to have gone off, is absorb’d by the -lymphatick Vessels, and returns into the -Blood—brings on Fevers, Gout, Rheumatism, -&c. &c.</p> - -<p>The Lymphaticks, are numberless Vessels, -which pass through spungy Glands. -These fine Tubes have a vast number of -Valves, which prevent the Lymph, (or -Liquor) which runs through them from -going <i>a contrary</i> Direction from that intended<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_12"></a>[12]</span> -for it. These fine Vessels are dispersed -over every Part of our Bodies. The -Point of a needle could not be applied to a -Spot, under the Skin, where the Mouth of a -lymphatic Vessel did not open to imbibe -whatever is put in contact with it. These -minute Branches run into other Branches, -so form larger Vessels, till at last they all -unite in a general Reservoir, where the -Lymph which they contained, mixes with -the Chyle, (the fine Part of our Food, -which is fit to be converted into Blood) -conducted there by the Lacteals, (the -Lacteals resemble the Lymphaticks—they -open into the Stomach, and Bowels—they -imbibe nothing but from <i>our Food</i>) -the Chyle, and Lymph, thus mix’d, run -up within the trunk of a large Vessel called -the thoracic Duct, on the inside of the -back Bone, which is incessantly emptying -it’s Liquor into a Vein under the left -Collar Bone, where it mixes with the -Blood, is immediately convey’d into the -vena Cava, which conducts it, with the -returning Blood from the rest of the Body, -(Lungs excepted) into the right Auricle<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_13"></a>[13]</span> -of the Heart—it thence is drove by the -contraction of the Auricle, into the right -Ventricle of the Heart—by it’s contraction, -into the Pulmonary Artery—from -thence through the whole Lungs, where -the Blood receives a Change from being -impregnated with something received from -the Air every Inspiration. The Blood -thus changed, is collected from the -Lungs into the Pulmonary Veins, and -conducted into the left Auricle of the -Heart; which drives it into the left Ventricle; -which forces it into a great Artery, -the Aorta—which rushes it over every -other Part of the Body.</p> - -<p>The lymphatic Vessels prevent our -Blood depending <i>solely</i> on our Food for -supply, and by means of them we can -subsist some time merely on the Produce -of our own Bodies. All these lymphatic -Vessels are closely accompanied by Arteries—whose -Pulsations assist the motion of the -Lymph to it’s Reservoir:⸺Consequently -the quicker and stronger they beat, the -faster the Lymph is hurried into the<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_14"></a>[14]</span> -Blood. Hence the Reason why Fevers -occasion so speedy a wasting of the Flesh—hence -Hectics bring on Consumptions—hence -People in Fevers can subsist long -with little Food,—The lymphaticks then -supplying the Blood too abundantly from -our own Juices.</p> - -<p>The Author of Nature has ordered an -extraordinary Quantity of Blood to be prepared -for the Child’s Food. Arteries run -into the Glands of the Breasts, and in -passing through them, the Blood, by a -most wonderful Change, is converted into -Milk!⸺by a Change, which nothing -but Custom prevents our viewing as a -Miracle!</p> - -<p>The admired Toast of the Town cannot -endure the Trouble of nursing. It -would confine her too much at home—it -has too vulgar an appearance—it is not -warranted by <i>the Example</i> of the first -Circle—the Milk must <i>therefore</i> be backen’d.—It -is denied Liberty to discharge -itself by the Out-lett Providence <i>intended<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_15"></a>[15]</span> -for it</i>—the Child, whose Constitution <i>it -was calculated for</i>, is not suffered to have -it’s Due. What becomes of the Milk?</p> - -<p>It is absorb’d by the lymphatic Vessels, -<i>contrary</i> to the <i>original</i> Intention of Nature—and -convey’d back into the Blood, -in the manner I have before described.—What -is the Consequence?—The blood -Vessels become <i>not only highly over-charged</i> -with Blood, but that Blood is thus rendered -of an improper Consistence. A Fever -ensues!—This Fever comes on when -the woman is <i>ill able to bear</i> it’s Shock!—<i>How -often</i> is this Fever <i>fatal</i>!</p> - -<p>The most fortunate Circumstance that -can happen, is, when the Milk finds -<i><span class="smcap">another</span> out-lett</i>. Probably <i>otherwise</i> -there may be a formation of Matter -somewhere—there is danger <i>that</i> Matter -may fly to some capital Part.</p> - -<p>If the Woman is young, healthy, strong, -it is most probable the Milk will <i>not</i> be absorb’d<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_16"></a>[16]</span> -<i>quick enough</i>. The Blood will <i>furnish</i> -Milk <i>faster</i> than the lymphatick Vessels -can imbibe it, and convey it back -again. The Breasts are painfully distended—they -inflame.</p> - -<p><i>When too late</i>—it is then resolved they -shall be suck’d.</p> - -<p>During the time of Pregnancy a small -quantity of Milk is lodged in the Milk -Vessels of the Breasts. This Milk, when -the nine Months are expired, is thick—clogs -the Vessels. If the Woman never -gave suck, the Pores through which the -Milk ought to issue to the Child, are not -open enough—they require therefore <i>to -be clear’d</i>, by the <i>old</i> Milk being suck’d -off, <i>the very day of the Delivery</i>, and to -empty the Milk Vessels of what must -otherwise clog them. Some woman ought -to suck this off therefore <i>as soon as possible</i>. -If the Child is put to the Breast <i>in -Twelve, or Sixteen Hours</i> after it’s Birth, -it will suck <i>greedily</i>—if delay’d three or<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_17a"></a>[17*]</span> -four Days, it is twenty to one the Child -will not attempt it for a long time.</p> - -<p>When therefore <i>the Necessity</i> of the -Case has overcome every Resolution -form’d for the Woman’s <i>not</i> giving suck, -and her Child is put to her Breast, it is -in vain!—the Child will not touch the -Breast!—<i>other</i> Children—or women attempt -to ease the poor Woman of her -Load of Milk—this Resource likewise -fails! the thick Milk has clog’d the Vessels—the -N-pp-es, owing to the hard -Distension of the Breasts, has shrunk into -them—and, besides, their Pores have -never been open’d—never been clear’d—no -endeavours avail! the distress’d Woman, -after having been sadly fatigued, -exhausted, finds herself disappointed of -Relief!—dreadful Symptoms soon appear! -she <i>too probably</i> falls a sacrifice to a -ridiculous—senseless—not to say a sinful -deviation <i>from the Path of Nature</i>!—how -many fine young Women have lately<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_18a"></a>[18*]</span> -died—and go off every Year, from this -Cause!</p> - -<p>But “<i>particular</i> Women have not Constitutions -strong enough to bear giving -suck. Certainly there are some Women -whom it might hurt.” Granted. Let -such particular Women give suck <i>only</i> for -the first <i>four</i>, <i>five</i> or <i>six Weeks</i>. If those -Women <i>then</i> really find themselves too delicate -for the <i>longer</i> continuance of such a -Drain, they then <i>may safely</i> by degrees -leave off giving suck—they have sufficiently -recover’d Strength to venture -throwing the Milk gently back into the -Blood. The most delicately form’d Woman -existing should <i>not</i> dream of suffering -a single Drop of the Milk which Nature -<i>intended for Evacuation</i>, to return into -the Blood, untill the Constitution is re-established—and -enabled to bear discharging -itself of the Superfluities, without -encountering the Dangers which <i>demonstrably</i> -attend a contrary Practice. If -a Woman is too delicate to bear <i>continuing -to suckle</i> her Infant, surely she is <i>too delicate</i><span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_19a"></a>[19*]</span> -to endure the flying in the Face of -Nature, and <i>risking</i> the Fever—if she is -healthy and strong, the more incumbent -her duty is, to nourish her Child—her -danger too equal. In <i>every</i> View, the salutary -Consequences attending Mothers -discharging their Duty to their Children -in this point, are so obvious, so glaring, -that <i>to me</i> it is matter of doubt whether -those who fail in it are most to be condemn’d -and despised for <i>their want of natural -Affection</i>—or pitied and ridiculed <i>for -their Folly</i>.</p> - -<p>These are my Ideas on this interesting -Subject. Let those Women who <i>obstinately</i> -persevere in a Resolution to deny -their Infants their natural Food—(and in -whose Judgements my Arguments have -appear’d deficient in Weight) stand the -Trial, and risk the Consequence. I most -sincerely hope the Success may answer -their Wishes!</p> - -<p>I now refer my Readers to the following -Letters. I can assert, <i>with conscious<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_20a"></a>[20*]</span> -Truth</i> that my Sentiments on the <i>preceding</i>, -and <i>following</i> Subjects, have been the -offspring of an Heart warm’d by a Love -for my fellow-Creatures—ever most ardently -solicitous for their Welfare and -Happiness, here and hereafter.</p> - -<p>I cannot expect <i>to reclaim</i> any Woman -who has <i>already used</i> a <i>Man</i>, for Reasons -I gave at the beginning of this Introduction, -and because, by quitting him, she -would <i>tacitly</i> acknowledge the Truth of -my Assertions—and because none but -those possess’d of the most exalted Qualities -of the Head and Heart, can have -<i>greatness</i> enough <i>to confess</i> they have been -in an Error of <i>such</i> a Nature.</p> - -<p>I am not without hopes however, of -<i>opening the Eyes</i> of <i>sensible</i> Men—and unmarried -Women, who are <i>at present</i> modest, -and <i>wish</i> to <i>remain so</i>—and preventing -the <i>former from advising</i>, and the <i>latter -from falling into</i> the scandalous Custom -of employing <i>Men</i>-Midwifes, which <i>I -know</i> to be <i><span class="smcap">erroneous</span> as to it’s <span class="smcap">pretended<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_21a"></a>[21*]</span> -safety</span></i>—<i><span class="smcap">fatally</span> dangerous</i> to the <span class="smcap">virtue</span>—and -<i><span class="smcap">certainly</span> destructive</i> of the -<span class="smcap">modesty</span><a id="FNanchor_1" href="#Footnote_1" class="fnanchor">[1]</a> of my fair Countrywomen.—They -may believe me when I assure -them that <span class="smcap">no purity</span> can withstand the -<i>rude</i> Shock of <i>such</i> Intrusions—<i>the whitest</i> -Ermine is <i>most</i> liable to have it’s Beauties -sullied!</p> - -<p>If I should be happy enough to hear -in a few Years that I have given the least -Check to this most abandon’d of <i>vicious</i> -Practices, the Consciousness of having -done a most signal Service to the Community, -will implant genuine Pleasure—substantial -Satisfaction in the Breast of</p> - -<p class="center">the Public’s<br /> -most obedient<br /> -humble Servant,</p> - -<p class="right"><span class="smcap">The Author</span>.</p> - -<div class="footnotes"> -<div class="footnote"> -<p><a id="Footnote_1" href="#FNanchor_1" class="label">[1]</a> I make a great Distinction <i>between Modesty</i>, -and <i>Virtue</i>. A Woman <i>may</i> be <i>virtuous</i>, <i>without</i> -being <i>Modest</i>—but it is <i>impossible</i> to be <i>modest</i>, without -being <i>virtuous</i>. Modesty is <i>the guard</i> of Virtue—but -it <i>is possible</i> a <i>cold</i> Constitution <i>may</i> preserve -<i>Virtue</i>, even <i>after</i> every Trace of <i>Modesty</i> has been -obliterated.</p> -</div> -</div> - -<hr class="chap x-ebookmaker-drop" /> - -<div class="chapter"> - -<p><span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_17"></a>[17]</span></p> - -<h1><span class="smaller">THE</span><br /> -Danger and Immodesty, <i>&c.</i></h1> - -<h2 class="nobreak" id="LETTER_I">LETTER I.</h2> - -</div> - -<p>In times, when every winter brings -scenes of prostitution from the privacy of -darkness into the public light of day; when -our ladies of quality, and women of fashion, -instead of being as remarkable for their -virtue, as for their beauty, openly cast -aside every sense of shame, and barefacedly -encourage the addresses of men, who, -avowedly, can have no intention but to -involve them in guilt; it is the duty of -every honest man to endeavour to trace the -evil <i>to its source</i>, in order that, by pointing -out <i>the foul spring</i> which corrupts the -stream, <i>the fountain may be cleared</i>, and -the contagion which rages from it, lessened, -if not entirely removed.</p> - -<p>Boarding schools are, beyond doubt, seminaries, -where the minds of girls are<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_18"></a>[18]</span> -early polluted. Let the mistress of the -school be ever so virtuous, prudent, and attentive, -the vicious girls (and some such there -always must be among a number) will find -sufficient opportunities to taint the tender -minds of unsuspecting innocence. Nothing -can be more destructive than bad example; -and, unfortunately, the human -mind is too ready to copy those which are -vicious—and <i>the vicious</i> are more importunate -and solicitous <i>to corrupt</i>, than <i>the virtuous</i> -are to gain proselytes to goodness.</p> - -<p>Though I believe <i>the first seeds of vice</i> -are imbibed at a boarding school, yet -I <i>by no means</i> look on that education as the -great cause of these frequent adulteries. If -principles of virtue have been inculcated in -infancy, they may yet, with proper care, -bud out afresh under good culture—and -flourish under the influence of good advice, -when those noxious weeds are choaked up, -which were planted by bad examples, but -which may wither on the cause being removed.</p> - -<p><span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_19"></a>[19]</span></p> - -<p><i>It is to the almost universal custom of <span class="smcap">employing -Men-midwives</span>, that I attribute -the frequent <span class="smcap">adulteries</span> which disgrace -our country.</i></p> - -<p><i>Ignorance</i> has spread this <i>shameless</i> custom. -Ignorance leads people to suppose -men <i>safer</i> than women—Ignorance of <i>what</i> -the <i>Men</i>-midwives <i>do</i>, leads modest women -<i>at first</i> to submit to employ men; and -<i>it is ignorance</i> which leads husbands [who -love their wives] to recommend, nay even -sometimes force them on their wives. -They know not what stripes they are -preparing for themselves—they know -not that they are removing the corner stone -on which the virtue of their wives -is founded—and all this on <i>a mistaken</i> -principle—<i>the idea that men are -safest</i>.</p> - -<p>The Almighty, through kindness to his -creatures, has so ordered the labours of -women, that even the honest part of the<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_20"></a>[20]</span> -Men-midwife tribe confess, that, in thirty -years practice, a person might probably -never meet <i>with a single case</i> where a good -woman might not have done the business. -This confession was made to me by an eminent -man-midwife, after a practice of -thirty-six years. How else would the -world have been peopled? The men have -<i>but lately</i> come into fashion. In praise of -<i>Scotland</i> and <i>Ireland</i> be it spoken, <i>the women -of those countries are still too modest to -employ them</i>. What is the consequence? -<i>Adulteries</i> happen <i>very seldom in those countries</i>; -and every farm-house swarms with -strong, healthy, <i>well-limbed</i> children. If -Men-midwives were requisite to bring children -into the world, what would become -of the wilds of America—the plains of -Africa? Even the <i>Hottentot women</i> are too -modest to employ men—they leave that -abandoned custom <i>to our English ladies</i>—yet -they are so fruitful they furnish slaves -to the globe. It is a notorious fact, that -more children have been lost since women -were so scandalously indecent as to employ<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_21"></a>[21]</span> -men, than for ages before that practice became -so general. Women have <i>a tenderness -of feeling for their own sex</i> in labour, -which <i>it is impossible men can ever equal -them in</i>. By <i>having felt</i> the pains, and -the anxieties attending child-birth, they -know how to sympathize in a woman’s -sufferings. <i>Their</i> feelings, therefore, are -<i>natural</i>. They lead them to be patient—they -prompt them <i>to allow nature to do her -own</i> peculiar work. They never dream of -having recourse to force—the <i>barbarous, -bloody crotchet</i> never stained <i>their</i> hands -with <i>murder</i>. There <i>never really</i> can be -occasion for a male operator, but when a -deed must be done which my soul shudders -at the idea of, and which I shall not -mention—but thanks to God, such instances -do not occur in a century!—To my -knowledge, a lady was twice delivered in -different parts of the country of England, -by common women-midwives, and both -those cases were <i>as unnatural</i> and difficult -as it is well possible to imagine—she and -the children did well—if she had employed<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_22"></a>[22]</span> -men, it is more than probable, <i>the children, -at least</i>, would have expired under -the crotchet—or been maimed by the forceps!</p> - -<p>And how should this be otherwise! a -long <i>un-impassioned</i> practice, <i>early</i> commenced, -and <i>calmly</i> pursued, is absolutely -requisite to give men <i>by art</i>, what women -attain <i>by nature</i>.—Dr. Hunter, very wisely, -very justly has said, that “Labour is nature’s -work.”—Nature <i>ought to be suffered</i> -nine hundred and ninety-nine times out of -a thousand, <i>to do her own work</i>. All the -knowledge <i>young</i> men can possibly obtain, -must be from <i>dead</i> bodies—for is it in common -sense to suppose, that a young lad -can explore the secret recesses of Venus, so -as to be <i>physically</i> well acquainted with -those parts in <i>living</i> females? No—fires -must quickly be raised, which unavoidably -will confuse all his discerning <i>reasoning</i> -faculties—and <i><span class="smcap">art</span> must instantly be lost in -<span class="smcap">nature</span></i>. Dr. Hunter, indeed, and one -or two men besides, <i>may perhaps</i>, by the<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_23"></a>[23]</span> -help of <i>cold</i> constitutions, and dint of very -long practice, do their business <i>nearly as -well</i> as women—by leaving all <i>to nature</i>—but, -if my life and fortune here, and salvation -hereafter, depended on the life -of any pregnant woman, and that of her -infant, I would stake all I held valuable on -her being attended by any old woman -midwife in England, in preference to any -man in the world. Whoever reads Nihel’s -Midwifery, will be satisfied of this truth, -that <i>women are infinitely safer than men</i>.</p> - -<p>Who can wonder at the profligacy of -the times, when it is known that even -women of character soon become so callous -to the bashfulness which ought to -characterize their sex (from being habituated -to the familiarities of their Men-midwives) -that they will not scruple informing -a male visitor, without even blushing, -“I was not very well for some days in the -country—so I came to town on purpose to -be satisfied by Dr. ⸺ that I was in -a good way—<i>the dear man</i> has told me that<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_24"></a>[24]</span> -<i>the child lies right</i>—and I am perfectly easy.” -Monstrous! that a lady can pretend to any -degree of modesty, and yet, <i>not content</i> -with having <i>a strange</i> man attending her -<i>for hours</i> when in labour (most of that time -intimately acquainted with <i>every</i> part) she -can, without any compunction, send for -a man, and admit him without reserve -<i>to the most unbounded</i> liberties, at a -time too, when she is <i>as able</i> to walk, and -<i>do every other act</i> of life, as if she was not -pregnant! Pray let me ask her ladyship, -<i>how</i> did “<i>The dear man</i>,”—“<i>sweet Dr. -⸺</i>,” <i>find out</i> how the child lay?—By -means <i>sufficient to taint the purity</i>, and <i>fully -the chastity</i>, of any woman breathing!—I -will boldly affirm, that, whoever admits -a man to those <i>licentious</i> freedoms, cannot -pretend to answer for what <i>may</i> be the consequences. -If <i>the last</i> circumstance does -not take place, it must be owing, either to -an extraordinary insensibility in the man, -or to the woman’s not suiting his taste, -having such choice of beauties to visit. Suppose, -for argument’s sake, that the fictitious<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_25"></a>[25]</span> -Goddess of Chastity, Diana herself, was -on earth, and employed me to satisfy -her doubts, during the months of pregnancy -prior to labour—and her mind -of course, at first, free from the smallest -tincture of guilty ideas—yet, if I chose it, -I could <i>so bewilder her reason</i>, that she -should <i>lose sight of every principle of virtue</i>—and -not <i>be able</i> to refuse me whatever I -chose to desire.—When a man is in free -possession of the Citadel, and all the out-works -surrendered at discretion, it is then -too late to attempt guarding the town from -plunder.</p> - -<p>But supposing these advantages are not -always taken (<i>which I dare say they are -not</i>) it cannot be denied <i>with truth</i> these -visitations from Men-midwives, remove in -a great measure, the horror of those intrusions -on the advanced posts of virtue, -which are its greatest safeguards—and serve -<i>to prepare the way</i> for the addresses of gay -young men, who make it their business<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_26"></a>[26]</span> -to seduce married women into the paths of -infamy.</p> - -<p>If any lady, desirous of exculpating herself -from my censure, pleads that “she -never admits a Man-midwife <i>to familiarities</i> -but when <i>in actual labour</i>”—I answer, -that, even <i>in actual</i> labour—<i>a woman has -many intervals of ease</i>, for many minutes -together quite free from pain—<i>in those intervals</i>, -her mind <i>cannot</i> maintain <i>its spotless -whiteness</i>—<i>in those</i> intervals she cannot -but <i>be conscious</i>, that the <i><span class="smcap">doctor</span> is infringing -on the <span class="smcap">husband</span></i>.</p> - -<p>But I believe there are very few women -who confine the Doctor’s familiarities to -the times of real labour. Lady ⸺, Mrs. -⸺, acquiesce in whatever he thinks -right during all the months of pregnancy—and -must he not be <i><span class="smcap">more</span> than man</i>, or -<span class="smcap">less than man</span>, who, <i>roving luxuriously</i> -through all the <i>hidden</i> charms of beauty, -can help being inflamed by passion?—and,<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_27"></a>[27]</span> -<i>if inflamed by passion</i>, he may proceed <span class="smcap">on -certainties</span> ... he has an <i><span class="smcap">unerring</span> -tell-tale under his inspection</i>, which gives -him <i>an <span class="smcap">infallible</span> cue, when he may -safely</i> throw aside the mask, fearless of any -repulse.</p> - -<p>Shew some sense of modesty, ye -Duchesses, Countesses, &c. &c. and those -inferior women, whom <i>ye have debauched</i> -by your bad examples, will again imitate -ye, in forsaking these Scandalous practices. -Blush, ye women of fashion, to own that -any man, besides your husbands, <i>is admitted -to liberties with your persons</i>. No longer -talk of “<i>dear</i> Doctor Hunter,” “<i>angelic</i> -Doctor—” “<i>enchanting</i> Doctor—.” ... -For my own part, if I was a married man, -I declare it would be <i>a matter of the utmost -indifference</i> to me, whether my wife -had spent the night <i>in a bagnio</i>—or an -hour of the forenoon locked up with a -man-midwife in her dressing room.—Let<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_28"></a>[28]</span> -this <i>shameless</i> custom be abolished, and -then virtue will fly back again to our metropolis, -with all her train of <i>genuine self-approving -pleasures</i>—and England be <i>once -more</i> as much famed for the chastity, as -for the beauty of its women.</p> - -<p>Adieu, Mr. Printer—you have received -this letter from a sincere admirer of female -modesty: Without it “beauty -<i>ceases being lovely</i>, or wit being engaging.” -Whoever possesses it cannot be enough -esteemed and regarded—whoever is deficient -in it cannot be sufficiently despised -and slighted. Ye <i>English</i> fair, <i>it ought</i> to -be your characteristic! <i>but while your fathers, -husbands, and brothers are unprincipled, -corrupted senators</i>—you think you -have a right to deviate from <i>your point of -honour</i>, since <i>they shew you the example in -their’s</i>.</p> - -<p><span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_29"></a>[29]</span></p> - -<p>To conclude—<i>true modesty is incompatible -with the idea of employing</i></p> - -<p class="right">A MAN MIDWIFE<a id="FNanchor_2" href="#Footnote_2" class="fnanchor">[2]</a>.</p> - -<div class="footnotes"> -<div class="footnote"> -<p><a id="Footnote_2" href="#FNanchor_2" class="label">[2]</a> Except when those <i>very rare instances</i> occur, -which do not happen once in two thousand labours.</p> -</div> -</div> - -<hr class="chap x-ebookmaker-drop" /> - -<div class="chapter"> - -<p><span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_30"></a>[30]</span></p> - -<h2 class="nobreak" id="LETTER_II">LETTER II.</h2> - -</div> - -<p>The favourable reception my last letter -met with from the public, leads -me to hope our married men will seriously -reflect on the dangers which attend the -employing Men-midwives to attend their -wives, except in cases where there is the -most urgent necessity for the interference -of art. I flatter myself it will not be difficult -to convince <i>sensible</i>, <i>modest</i> women -of two undeniable truths, which nothing -but prejudice, or vice, can render them -blind to the force of:—First, that Men-midwives -are not so safe as women;—and -secondly, that it is absolutely impossible to -permit men to take the unbounded freedoms -which Men-midwives <i>falsely pretend are -necessary</i>, without throwing themselves entirely -at their mercy, and, at all events, -being polluted by their needless invasion.</p> - -<p>The Men-midwives and their friends, have -wisely chose to be silent. They are conscious -my assertions cannot be denied with any<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_31"></a>[31]</span> -shadow of truth, they therefore prudently -have declined the combat. If they had attempted -controverting my arguments, they -must have discovered the sandy foundations -on which they have established the idea of -<i>their being the proper</i> attendants on the labours -of women. Objections which they -cannot remove,—dangers which they cannot -dissipate,—and impurities which no -varnish can conceal, they wish to avoid -mentioning; fearful lest an attempt to answer -my letter, should display to the world -the weakness and insufficiency of their defence, -and stimulate abler pens than mine -to continue the subject too long for their -interest. They vainly imagine my letter -will soon be forgotten, and be consigned -to oblivion amongst waste paper. But -they are mistaken,—this letter shall accompany -it annually to the press, to remind -my fair countrywomen of the inestimable -value of chastity,—and to warn -them from those practices which pave the -way to the most flagrant breach of it;—and -I am not without hope that I shall be<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_32"></a>[32]</span> -joined by the friends of virtue, and assisted -in the arduous talk I have undertaken. -What undertaking can be more difficult to -succeed in, than an endeavour to reform -the manners of a vicious age? Yet, encouraged -by the consciousness of the rectitude -of my intentions, and of the sincerity -of my wishes to repair the foundations -of matrimonial happiness, I freely offer -my sentiments to the world,—let the candid -weigh them in the scale of common-sense,—and -either adopt, or disregard them, -as they appear to tend to the benefit, or -prejudice of mankind. The consequence -of their decision will principally affect -themselves,—it will not reach to me.</p> - -<p>The Men-midwives are sensible, that, -when they urge their knowledge in anatomy -as a reason for their being safer than -women, they mean to take advantage of -<i>the ignorance</i> of mankind. Where <i>very -rare</i>, <i>particular</i> circumstances occur, undoubtedly -the knowledge of anatomy becomes -then absolutely necessary to direct<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_33"></a>[33]</span> -the operator in the means requisite to save -the woman’s life. In that distressed, unhappy, -deplorable situation, no modesty -can possibly be violated. The poor afflicted -woman, is, <i>if sensible</i>, so taken up -with anxious thoughts, and torturing -pains, that she is <i>not conscious</i> of the transaction—and -the Royal Exchange, when -crouded, might be spectators, without attracting -her attention, or interrupting her -fears. It is quite different in <i>a very large -majority</i> of labours. The woman has -many intervals of ease,—she does not apprehend -there is any peculiar danger in -her case:—her mind, while free from -pain, is at liberty calmly to attend to -whatever is done. There is not above one -labour in a thousand where there is any -occasion for the knowledge of anatomy. -I insist that <i>except in those very extraordinary -cases</i>, a knowledge of anatomy leads Men-midwives -frequently to do great mischief. -<i>It makes them impatient.</i> They <i>know how</i> -to bring on the labour pains,—they <i>know -how to force the birth</i>. From <i>this <span class="smcap">destructive<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_34"></a>[34]</span> -knowledge</span></i>, numbers of children -are demolished,—numbers of women -are thrown into fevers by <i>lacerations</i> and -<i>inflammations</i>, which might have the worst -consequences, and which never would -have happened <i>if the knowledge of anatomy</i> -had not <i>tempted men</i> to have recourse <i>to -<span class="smcap">art</span> within the proper boundaries of <span class="smcap">nature’s</span> -empire</i>. For this reason, if I was -a married man, I would not employ <i>even -a woman</i> who had been bred under a Man-midwife. -Her <i>knowing the parts <span class="smcap">anatomically</span></i>, -and <i>understanding the <span class="smcap">use</span> of -<span class="smcap">instruments</span></i>, and pursuing the <i>teizing</i>, -<i>fiddling</i> customs of the men who had instructed -her, instead of recommending her -to me, would be a sufficient cause to prevent -my employing her.</p> - -<p><i><span class="smcap">The only safe knowledge</span> for a midwife -to possess</i>, is, <i>that which is taught by -<span class="smcap">experience</span></i>. Whenever it <i>ceases</i> being -possible for nature, with such assistance, -to do her work, <i>then</i>, and <i>then only</i>, art -ought to be called in with instruments to<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_35"></a>[35]</span> -aid.—Yet our young women are not ashamed -<i>premeditately to resolve</i> on employing -men, though there are such a multitude -of chances <i>against</i> the supposition of a dead -child—or that there will be occasion for -the destruction of her infant to save her -own life. It is for this wanton use of men, -that I wish I had abilities to expose their -want of modesty in colours striking enough -to hold out our women to the universal ridicule -of the world, and draw down on -them the contempt and indignation of the -virtuous.</p> - -<p>Is it not laughable to hear of a <i>modest</i> -woman sending for <i>a man</i> to inform her -<i>whether or not she is with child</i>, and <i>how -far gone</i>?—Heavens! <i>a little patience</i> -would soon have cleared up that matter, -and the most skilful man may be mistaken, -<i>even allowing the supposition</i> (which is <i><span class="smcap">not</span> -probable</i>) <span class="smcap">that he may be quite cool</span>, -and <i>experience <span class="smcap">no fluttering</span> sensations -to confuse his mind during <span class="smcap">the serious</span> investigation</i>. -Why cannot the lady <i>allow a<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_36"></a>[36]</span> -few months</i> to elapse? Her doubts would -then have been removed, without any <i>male</i> -intrusions, <i>without <span class="smcap">scandalous violations</span> -of <span class="smcap">modesty</span></i>—without, what I -term, <span class="smcap">shameful pollutions of her -person</span>.</p> - -<p>What must Men-midwives think of those -ladies, who send for them to be inspected -on such trifling occasions? <i>What can they -avoid thinking?</i> Must they not conclude, -that those ladies are restrained from adultery -<i><span class="smcap">not</span> by any principle</i> of virtue, but by -a dread of the consequences; and, since -they can admit no man to familiarities but -their Man-midwife (who is the <i>priviledged -father confessor of England</i>) without losing -their reputations, they are resolved to be -<i>as immodest</i>, without losing their characters, -as the depraved, profligate custom of the -world can authorize them? Men-midwives -entertain each other with curious recitals -of their adventures among the fair:—Surely -those women cannot justly be pitied, who -thus by their folly, or vice, furnish subjects<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_37"></a>[37]</span> -<i>first</i> for their sensual <i>ideas</i>, and <i>afterwards</i> -for their mirth.</p> - -<p>I have been a good deal amused by hearing -my letter commented on in different -companies, where the author was far from -being suspected to be present. The Men-midwives, -and the ladies who receive -pleasure from employing them, never can -forgive me for having exposed their conduct. -All they can however say against -me, is, that I am “<i>very indelicate</i>;”—that -“<i>it is a shame such papers should appear</i>.”—Let -them be informed, Mr. Printer, -that <span class="smcap">if I am “indelicate,”</span> it is -<i>because <span class="smcap">they are immodest</span></i>. Where -<i>the bone</i> is <i>corrupted</i>, the flesh must be removed, -and <i>the foul parts laid bare</i>, in order -to be <i>scraped</i>, and <i>purified</i>—<i>desperate -disorders require desperate remedies</i>. <i>The -“shame” does not consist <span class="smcap">in what I write</span> -but <span class="smcap">in what they do</span></i>.—<i>Let them <span class="smcap">quit -their practice</span>, I will most readily throw -aside my pen.</i></p> - -<p><span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_38"></a>[38]</span></p> - -<p>I should be sorry to entertain so bad an -opinion of the generality of my fair countrywomen, -as to suppose them hardened -by the depraved custom of the times, beyond -a possibility of being roused to a sense -of danger for themselves and infants, and -to a sense of virtue. Doctor Hunter is, -beyond dispute, <i>the best Man</i>-midwife in -the world—yet, let the advocates for the -<i>indiscriminate</i> use of men lay their hands on -their hearts, and answer me ingenuously -this question—Suppose any <i>three</i> of the -<i>best</i> Midwives in London had lost <i>in their -lives, the same number</i> of women of fashion -<i>Doctor Hunter</i> has lost <i>within these two or -three years</i>,<a id="FNanchor_3" href="#Footnote_3" class="fnanchor">[3]</a> would they not have exclaimed<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_39"></a>[39]</span> -loudly, and <i>taken advantage</i> of those -deaths <i>to prove the danger of employing women</i>? -All England would have rung of -their mismanagement—and the women -would have been ruined!—There are women -in London who have laid several thousands, -and yet never lost either a mother -or an infant.</p> - -<p>Though the abandoned custom exculpates -ladies in the estimation of a dissipated -world, yet I recommend to their confederation -<i>how their thoughts, during the visits</i> -of Men-midwives, will stand the test of the -penetrating eye of their Creator.</p> - -<p><span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_40"></a>[40]</span></p> - -<p>I hope to live to see the day, when innate -modesty will be the characteristic of -English women; and <i>of course</i>, when a lady -will not be more publickly branded with -infamy for the most barefaced prostitution, -than for the effrontery which <i>will then</i> be -necessary to enable a woman wantonly to -employ</p> - -<p class="right">A MAN-MIDWIFE.</p> - -<div class="footnotes"> -<div class="footnote"> -<p><a id="Footnote_3" href="#FNanchor_3" class="label">[3]</a> I would by no means be understood to insinuate -the most distant reflection on Dr. Hunter’s management. -I have not the smallest idea that any of those -deaths were in consequence of the least fault in his execution -of his business. I only mentioned them to shew -that misfortunes <i>may happen</i> with the most able Man-midwife; -and therefore that it is cruel to name one or two -accidents as proof of a woman’s being unsafe, since they -will happen to the first man in the whole world. I look -on Dr. Hunter as a most skilful anatomist; able physician; -experienced, tender, patient Man-midwife. If -it was left to me to call any man to the labour of a woman -in imminent danger, and whose life was linked in -mine, Dr. Hunter is the man I would send for without -a moment’s hesitation, his skill, but, above all, his -experience, <span class="smcap">age</span>, and <span class="smcap">infirmities</span>, render him the -<span class="smcap">only</span> man proper to be allowed <i>to take liberties</i> with -married women. Yet <i>any woman of experience</i>, in my -opinion, is <i>infinitely safer</i> than even Dr. Hunter, <i>except -in very extraordinary cases</i>.</p> -</div> -</div> - -<hr class="chap x-ebookmaker-drop" /> - -<div class="chapter"> - -<p><span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_41"></a>[41]</span></p> - -<h2 class="nobreak" id="LETTER_III">LETTER III.</h2> - -</div> - -<p>In my two last letters, I believe I satisfied -those <i>who are open to conviction</i>, that -<i>even the best</i> Men-midwives are <i>not so safe</i> -as women,—and that the custom is destructive -of modesty, and affords those -Men-midwives <i>who chuse it</i>, finer seraglios -than are in the possession of the most luxuriant -Monarchs of the East.</p> - -<p>There are bad consequences attending -the practice which I have not mentioned. -It is productive of danger, and of many -evils, even when followed by the most eminent -men in London;—who can fix limits -then to its pernicious consequences, when -a set of <i>raw, unskillful young</i> men are turned -loose through this town—round its -skirts—and over the whole kingdom, and -are received by the credulous multitude -with no other recommendation than the -words over the door of “⸺, <i>Surgeon and -Man-midwife</i>?” Boys think themselves -qualified for Men-midwives, by having attended<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_42"></a>[42]</span> -one or two courses of lectures under -Doctor Hunter,—or, perhaps, without -having heard any lectures at all, or ever -having seen a subject anatomized, start -from behind an apothecary’s counter—and -begin their career, murdering of infants -without mercy; and with impunity laying -the foundation for cancers, and the most -dreadful diseases in women;—not to mention -the chance of their ruining the peace -of families, by introducing vice and discord, -where health and harmony might -otherwise have gladdened their serene dwellings.—They -know enough of the ways -requisite to use force;⸺they have heard -female Midwives blamed for allowing tedious -labours;⸺they think they will be -deemed expert, in proportion <i>to the quickness</i> -with which they bring the child into -the world,—and the mischiefs they of course -give rise to are innumerable! It is not in -the nature of things possible that <i>a young -man</i>, ever so well qualified <i>by study</i>, can be -<i>a safe</i> Midwife—how dreadful then must -the situations be of those poor women who<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_43"></a>[43]</span> -are in the hands of the numberless men -who practice that business throughout England!⸺The -people ignorantly take for -granted <i><span class="smcap">that the sex</span> constitutes knowledge—insures -safety</i>! The truth is, <i><span class="smcap">the -sex</span> alone is sufficient</i> to render <span class="smcap">any knowledge</span> -destructive in <i>general</i> practice. If -the men <i>must be introduced</i> into <i>the privacies</i> -of women, I would earnestly recommend -it as <i><span class="smcap">the most essential</span> qualification</i> -requisite <span class="smcap">to prepare</span> them for the -study, that they submit to having their -<i><span class="smcap">voices</span> made delicate</i>.</p> - -<p>And here I should have finished my letter, -and the subject, if I had not seen an -Essay in the Gazetteer of the 17th, signed -“Old Chiron,” which I cannot avoid making -some remarks on, before I conclude.</p> - -<p>The author of it uses tolerable language, -and probably could write pretty well on -any other subject. He has done as much -as could have been attempted in order <i>to -continue</i> the delusive error which blinds<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_44"></a>[44]</span> -mankind. He knew he had <i>not Truth</i> on -his side—he has therefore <i>put words together, -without argument</i>⸺he has boldly denied, -what it is impossible to disprove⸺he has -<i>as</i> boldly <i>asserted <span class="smcap">what never happened</span></i>—and -then <i>laughed-off</i> facts, trusting -<i>by ridicule</i> to conceal their existence. -The pen of <i>Junius</i> could not defend the -women who use men.</p> - -<p>I believe <i>the thinking</i> part of the world -will join with me in opinion, that he would -have shewn more wisdom if he had remained -silent. A bad defence does harm -to any cause—and <i>the more able</i> the defender -appears in his stile and language, the -worse it is for his cause when he convinces -his readers, that even <i>his abilities</i> cannot do -it service. The more this subject is investigated, -the more prejudicial it will be -to his profession.<a id="FNanchor_4" href="#Footnote_4" class="fnanchor">[4]</a> A practice, <i>adopted</i>, and -<i>continued through a jumblement</i> of <span class="smcap">ignorance</span> -and <span class="smcap">vice</span>, can only be favoured by -suffering <i>an impenetrable</i> shade <i>to veil</i> actions -<i>fit only for darkness</i>.</p> - -<p><span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_45"></a>[45]</span></p> - -<p>Old Chiron has been drove so hard as -to have been forced to assert that the female -Midwives always “<i>cram</i> their patients -with cordials⸺<i>keeping them intoxicated -during the time they are in labour</i>”—and -that they act like infernal fiends, “<i>driving</i> -poor women <i>up and down stairs, notwithstanding -their <span class="smcap">shrieks</span></i>, and <i>shaking them -so violently</i> as often to bring on convulsion -fits, on pretence of hastening their -labours⸺laughing at their cries⸺and -breaking wretched jests upon the -contortions of the women, whose torments -would make a feeling man shudder -at the sight.”⸺I believe that -it is not possible any one can be <i>so sillily credulous</i> -as to have faith in these most <i>shocking, -unnatural, improbable, horrid</i> recitals! -Is it possible even <i>if such a brute</i> in an human -shame found an entry into an house, -that the poor lying-in woman could <i>be able</i> -to be forced “<i>up and down stairs</i>?”⸺and -<i>allow herself</i> to be <i>shook</i>? If <i>she</i> was ignorant -enough, and foolish enough to consent, -<i>would her relations</i>⸺<i>her friends</i>⸺anxiously<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_46"></a>[46]</span> -attending her, <i>likewise be so ignorant</i> -as not to know <i>such</i> treatment was highly -improper, as well as <i>cruel beyond cannibal -brutality</i>? And this too <i>in England</i>! -where bearing of children is not so very <i>uncommon</i>, -so very <i>extraordinary</i> a circumstance, -as that a Midwife could find means -to persuade people into such dreadful absurdities!—The -idea <i>is too ridiculous</i>! I have -seen among my near relations, many women -in labour, as long as it was decent for -a man to be present; and declare I have -always seen their Midwives treat them with -the utmost tenderness. I have enquired -of several ladies of my acquaintance, each -of whom has bore many children, and always -employed women, and they have all -declared they never even <i>heard</i> of any thing -in the <i>most distant</i> manner resembling such -treatment, as this <i>interested</i> author has abused -his talents by relating. To vouch -falsehoods, and for <i>the most malignant</i> purposes, -needs no comment. Perhaps some -diabolical wretch may have behaved in this -manner⸺but is that ground enough to<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_47"></a>[47]</span> -erect defamations on, against the whole -sex? If <i>such</i> proof was to be admitted decisive, -I could severely retaliate on him -<i>such</i> proceedings of men, as would melt -an heart of adamant! and I could bring -demonstrable evidence to confirm the authenticity -of my relations—but I have already -been called “<i>indelicate</i>”—and if I -was to write the horrors my pen could unfold—delineate -facts, painting <i>the indecencies</i>, -and <i>barbarities</i> of men <i>whom I could -name</i>, I should <i>indeed be indelicate</i>. What -must then the <i><span class="smcap">acts</span> have been, which <span class="smcap">no -language</span> can convey a description of, -without offending the virtuous</i>, and <i>shocking</i> -the <i>humane</i>! yet I should look on myself -as very culpable if I had instanced these -men <i>as standards</i> for the whole profession -to be judged by. I gave the preference <i>to -women, <span class="smcap">not</span> because all men <span class="smcap">were brutes</span></i>, -but because <i>the greatest Saint</i> on earth, <i><span class="smcap">if</span> a -<span class="smcap">man</span> in health</i>, could not answer for his -principles being proof against the <i>irresistible -temptations arising</i> from being <i>freely indulged</i> -in <i>the most luxurious</i> liberties with all<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_48"></a>[48]</span> -<i>the feminine</i> beauties of lovely women,—and -because their knowledge of anatomy, -and their <i><span class="smcap">instruments</span> being ready at -hand</i>, too often <i>tempt</i> them to use <i>force</i>, -and do mischief in parts of the most <i>exquisite</i> -sensibility, which <i>no</i> art, <i>no</i> care, <i>no</i> -remedy, can <i>ever</i> after repair; where, if -<i>nature</i> had been allowed to do her office, -she would have been <i>a safe</i> operator, and -all would have ended happily; and let any -impartial person decide <i>whether a man</i>, who -knows every method of forcing the birth, -<i>or a woman</i>, who is conscious of being <i>unacquainted</i> -with <span class="smcap">that dangerous knowledge</span>, -<i>are <span class="smcap">most likely</span> to alter the -<span class="smcap">course of nature</span>, by interfering</i>, where -she ought to be <span class="smcap">the sole</span> actor?⸺It -is an indisputable fact, that women have -such a peculiar sympathy for females big -with young, that ninety-nine out of an -hundred carry it to such an excess as to be -anxious about <i>brutes</i> in that situation. I -have often heard ladies uneasy about mares -they have seen with foal, and bitches with -whelp. It is <i>an instinct</i> implanted, and<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_49"></a>[49]</span> -interwoven with their natures <i>by the Great -Source</i> of all things, for the wisest purposes. -Those <i>who have felt</i> the agonies of -child birth, surely must be able to sympathize -<i>more feelingly</i> than men who can only -form an idea of them by theory. Women -must be allowed to have more tenderness -in their natures than men⸺so that <i>in -every view</i> we cannot contest the point of -sensibility with them. Yet this author asserts -women are improper for Midwives -because they are <i>most</i> inhuman—because -they drive their fellow-creatures up and -down stairs—and shake them into convulsion -fits! did old Chiron write ironically? -or did he mean to betray the cause of -the male-practitioners, by asserting fictitious -nonsense, which carries falsehood on -it’s face?⸺Let any one <i>view the forceps</i>, -and then judge <i>whether</i> it is <i>a <span class="smcap">gentle instrument</span>? -it speaks it’s office!</i>—Let any -one <i>view the crotchet</i>, crooked scissars, &c. -sharp knives to be sure are instruments fit -to be trusted in every hand! they pursue<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_50"></a>[50]</span> -<i>healing</i> measures! they never commit <i>murder</i>!</p> - -<p>The writer was pleased to confine himself -to what I said of the Hottentot women, -because the heat of their climate was -adapted to his purpose. I mentioned likewise -“the wilds of America,” and the -kingdoms of Scotland and Ireland. I -fancy those countries are cold enough in -winter.</p> - -<p>He has quoted the practice of the Athenians -as an example for our women. -Though <i>Heathen virtues</i> are great reproaches -<i>on Christian vices</i> (I should have -said, on the vices of people who are only -<i>Christians in name</i>, by outwardly professing -what their lives are daily contradicting) yet -I should imagine <i>no Heathen impurities</i> ought -to be admitted patterns against Christian -virtues.—Our surgeons are better anatomists -than the Athenians were; but I am -afraid the Athenian men were better Christians, -though they lived before the birth -of our Saviour.</p> - -<p><span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_51"></a>[51]</span></p> - -<p>“But the women of quality <i>do so fall in -love</i> with their Doctors.”—I beg he will -excuse me,—I <i>never</i> supposed they <span class="smcap">fell -in love</span> with <span class="smcap">their male inspector</span>. -<i>The sensations</i> which <i>Men-midwives</i> give rise -to, <i>deserve not</i> the name which distinguishes -<i>that <span class="smcap">noble</span> passion <span class="smcap">of the soul</span></i>.—<i><span class="smcap">Love</span>, -allies us to our Divine Original, elevates -our ideas to Heaven, and makes us emulous of -worthy actions</i>! It’s signification is <i>scandalously -perverted</i>, when used to describe <i>the -impure</i> gratifications of sense, which degrade -us <i>below the brutes</i>!—<i>Love</i>, and <i>Virtue</i>, -are <i>inseparable</i>. Love never inspires -the human heart, but when <i>that heart is -in pursuit of virtue</i>; when <i>vicious</i> purposes -<i>pollute</i> the mind, <i>it’s end</i> is <i>lust</i>.</p> - -<p>“Has there ever been related an instance -of so unnatural a connexion?” <i>Many</i> -where <i>it has been attempted</i>—<i>several</i> where -it has <i>succeeded</i>. Any person may buy the -trial of Doctor Morley, where they will -see that he was <i>convicted</i>, and <i>fined a thousand -pounds</i>, for seducing Mrs. Biker. The -poor woman accused the Doctor on her<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_52"></a>[52]</span> -death-bed, and told the whole transaction. -The Doctor pleaded to his friends “<i>the -strength of the temptation, the frailty of -nature</i>; and the impossibility of any man’s -<i>resisting such powerful charms</i>.” He quitted -his business; <i>the ladies</i>, however, <i>approved -his conduct</i>,—it <i><span class="smcap">recommended</span> him <span class="smcap">to -their favour</span></i>, and <i>he was more employed -than ever</i>! Doctor ⸺ was forced to -feign madness to escape the rage of an injured -husband, for having frightened his -wife to death! She happened to be <i>a virtuous</i>, -though <i><span class="smcap">not</span> a <span class="smcap">modest</span></i>, woman!—Count -<span class="smcap">Struenzy</span> too was a Man-midwife.—Would -he ever have dared to lift -his eye, or breathe his infamous passion -to a ⸺, if he had not been encouraged -and <i>familiarized</i> by the freedoms admitted -by the profession of a Man-midwife? -Certainly no. Whoever reads the news-papers -of three years back, will find many -paragraphs informing us of prosecutions -of Men-midwives for crim. con.</p> - -<p><span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_53"></a>[53]</span></p> - -<p>“A man <i>never</i> seen by them <i>but in -their distress</i>, is sure most unlikely to -become an object <i>of their desire</i>; nor -can the ladies, however lovely in the -bloom of health, be supposed <i>capable of -retaining</i> their attractions <i>in the hour of -agony</i>.”—The writer knows that neither -of these assertions are matters of fact. In -regard to the first, <i>many women</i> see their -Men-midwives <i>in perfect health, to be informed -if they are with child? How far -gone?</i> “Whether the child lies right?” -and on many other <span class="smcap">pretences</span>.—Men and -women, on <i>such trying</i> occasions, <i>must -give way to <span class="smcap">nature</span>—there is no possibility -of withstanding it</i>.—As to women’s <i>not</i> -being “<i>attractingly lovely</i> when in labour,”—there -he likewise must have been sensible -that he erred from truth. Those -pains <i>rather add</i> to beauty; and though, -<i>during the continuance of racking tortures, -neither</i> party can attend to any thing but -the pains felt on one side, and the compassion -which a good man must sympathize -in on the other; yet <i>in the intervals</i><span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_54"></a>[54]</span> -(many there <i>always</i> are, and <i>generally</i> they -are <i>long intervals</i>) <i>no uneasiness on either -side</i> leaves the minds <i>of both</i> at liberty to -entertain <i>other <span class="smcap">ideas</span></i>.</p> - -<p>“And if he” (the Man-midwife) “is at -all to answer for their conduct, is, I -think, only to be reckoned with <i><span class="smcap">for -recovering them</span> so early</i>, and <i><span class="smcap">so -putting it in their power to</span> go -abroad</i> and <i><span class="smcap">coquet it</span> the sooner</i>.”—The -author is pleased to be <i>facetious with -the ladies</i>! I do not at all wonder that -<i>those men</i> who have <i>such foundation</i> for -censuring their conduct, <i>presume thus</i> to -ridicule them for their eagerness to visit, -in order to <i>receive the homage</i> of their <i>criminal -admirers</i>! I should have thought, -however, that the subject was not of a -nature which could authorize such indecent -raillery. It verifies the old proverb, -“<i>too much familiarity breeds contempt</i>.”</p> - -<p>As to the assertion, that “the faculty -employ men to their own wives”—I know<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_55"></a>[55]</span> -very many instances to the contrary—and -even <i>if this was otherwise</i>, it would be by -no means conclusive. Men who have -<i>such choice</i> of fine women <i>to take the most -licentious liberties</i> with, most probably -cannot remain long faithful to their own -wives—they may therefore easily be supposed -soon to become so indifferent about -them, as to be very ready to suffer their -own brethren to lay them, <i>by way of -<span class="smcap">keeping up the farce</span></i>, and <i>blinding the -world</i>. I take for granted however they -permit <i>no private examinations</i>. They are -too much in the secret.</p> - -<p>The gentleman concludes with telling -us a story of Dr. Ford’s having attended -a poor woman for three days and nights, -who had been ill used by a woman.⸺What -then?—It only proves that Dr. -Ford <i>is not destitute of humanity</i>, and <i>that -there is <span class="smcap">one</span></i> woman <i>who interfered with -nature</i>, and <i>of course did mischief</i>.—I know -he “is a favourite with many women of -distinction”—but <i>those ladies <span class="smcap">best</span> know<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_56"></a>[56]</span> -<span class="smcap">how</span> he has recommended himself to their -favour</i>. Neither Dr. Ford, nor Dr. -Hunter, can presume to affirm, that they -never take the most intimate freedoms with -ladies, when there is no chance for labour.⸺Indeed, -the ladies make no secret -of it—they now can submit to those -examinations on the morning of an assembly, -tell their company of it at dinner, -and go to a tavern to supper!</p> - -<p>And now, Mr. Printer, allow me <i>to -take my leave of you, and the public on -this theme</i>.—The unprejudiced will be -convinced—at least it was this flattering, -this most pleasing hope, that stimulated -me to write on this subject.—I can have no -sinister views—the conduct of the world -will not interfere with my happiness—for -I never will marry any woman, unless I -know her sentiments correspond with mine. -The public are now in possession of all -I can think on the subject—The good -sense of the people of England will decide -how far my hints may conduce to their domestic<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_57"></a>[57]</span> -happiness.—I leave <i>to other pens</i> to -proceed on it, <i>in answer to any writer who -may enter the lists against me</i>. Whoever -wishes to know my sentiments may review -these three letters. I should be an -hypocrite, if I attempted to conceal, that, -as I took up my pen <i>for the benefit of the -community</i>, so I shall be <i>most highly gratified</i>, -if I hereafter find my time has been -employed to purpose, in <i>opening the -eyes of the thoughtless</i>, <i>informing the ignorant</i>, -and <i>warning the virtuous</i>. I despair -of shaming the immodest!</p> - -<p>While I live, I shall think <span class="smcap">no woman -modest</span> who employs</p> - -<p class="right">A MAN-MIDWIFE.</p> - -<div class="footnotes"> -<div class="footnote"> -<p><a id="Footnote_4" href="#FNanchor_4" class="label">[4]</a> I take for granted, Old Chiron is a Man-midwife.</p> -</div> -</div> - -<hr class="chap x-ebookmaker-drop" /> - -<div class="chapter"> - -<p><span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_58"></a>[58]</span></p> - -<h2 class="nobreak" id="APPENDIX">APPENDIX.</h2> - -</div> - -<p>As I do not wish to bewilder the -Judgments of my Readers, but to -convince their Understandings,—and as -I have, throughout my Letters, laid so -much Weight on the Dangers which attend -hurrying the Labours of Women, I -cannot dismiss this Pamphlet into the -World without endeavouring <i>clearly to demonstrate</i> -the Utility of allowing Nature -<i>to adhere strictly</i> to <i>her own</i> Period for accomplishing -the Birth.</p> - -<p>Men, who have <i>not</i> been <i>accustomed to -thinking</i>;—but whose Lives have been -spent in the various Occupations, or dissipated -Pleasures of the World, by having -been habituated daily to view the common -round which Providence takes in the -natural Events of Life, never felt their -Wonder and Admiration excited by considering -them in the Manner which is incumbent -on reasonable, intelligent Beings.<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_59"></a>[59]</span> -Those, on the other Hand, whose only -<i>real</i> Enjoyments proceed from a delightful -Indulgement of the Soul in Contemplations -on the astonishing Works of God, -<i>divest</i> themselves of <i>that Familiarity to -them</i> which the hourly Evidence of their -Senses would otherwise have obscured—and -render’d Matter for no rational Reflection.</p> - -<p>Thus we are blind to the surprizing -<i>progressive</i> Change, which enlarges a new -born Infant, to the size of Manhood! or -a small Seed, to a large Tree!—If an Infant, -<i>the day after its Birth</i>, was to walk -round the Town, in compleat symmetry -of Person, and six Feet high, would not -the Miracle forcibly strike the Minds of -the most thoughtless of our Species?—The -difference is made only <i>by Custom</i>. -Twenty Hours, and Twenty Years, are -exactly the same in the Sight of God!—<i>My</i> -Amazement is excited by seeing the -Change wrought <i>in twenty Years</i>, to the -full in <i>as high a degree</i>, as the <i>same Sight</i>, -in twenty <i>Hours</i>, would raise the Astonishment<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_60"></a>[60]</span> -of an embroidered Maccaroni at -Carlisle House, or, of an infinitely <i>more</i> -rational, esteemable Being; a poor, ignorant -Labourer in the Fields!</p> - -<p>The Work of Nature, <i>in Labour</i>, is one -of it’s most extraordinary Acts!—Untill -the Parts are <i>in some degree prepared</i> by the -miraculous Change effected in them <i>by the -Labour Pains</i>, the Child could no more -enter the World than it could fly into the -Clouds!—Untill the Parts are <i>properly</i> -prepared, the Child cannot appear without -<i>the most obvious</i> Danger.</p> - -<p>Every Pain has it’s Office,—it lubricates—it -dilates. Where these Pains are -<i>not</i> violent—are <i>not</i> quick in their Return—but -are lingering, and tedious, they -<i>plainly</i> indicate that <i>the Woman requires -great Preparation</i>—Nature is <i>gradually</i>, and -by <i>the most gentle</i> Means, forwarding <i>the -Distension</i>—and if left <i>to herself</i>, will <i>not</i> -bring on the Birth till every thing <i>is accommodated -to her Purpose</i>.</p> - -<p><span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_61"></a>[61]</span></p> - -<p>Men Midwives, seldom wait for Nature’s -Moment. Women are objected to, because -they are tedious—Men are extolled -for their quickness. If Doctor ⸺ has -two or three pregnant Ladies waiting, -from whom he expects handsome Payments, -he will <i>take Merit</i> from hastening -the Birth—and if any Accident happens -from his Impatience, his Reputation is -too well establish’d to suffer in the Eyes of -Mankind—and the Misfortune is attributed -to some of the common Casualties attending -Labour, when it derived it’s -Source <i>solely</i> from the Doctor’s having -brought the Child forward, <i>unnaturally</i>, -before the Parts were pre-disposed, by a -proper distension, for it’s Reception, and -Passage. I fear two Ladies died lately -owing to this very Practice. The Parts -inflamed—the Inflammation spread by -Sympathy—the Bowels mortified. If -these Ladies had lain-in in the Country, -and had employ’d common, plain Women, -who pretended to no Knowledge -but what they derived from Experience, -it is a Million to one that the Ladies would -now have been alive and well.</p> - -<p><span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_62"></a>[62]</span></p> - -<p>The Men-midwives not only give rise -to Inflammations by bringing the Child -before the Woman has felt <i>half the number -of Pains</i> which Nature intended <i>to predispose</i> -the Parts—but likewise by <i>their -abominable Dilatations</i>. Can any Practice -be more repugnant to common Sense, than -that of irritating the exquisitely sensitive -nervous Fibres of those Parts, by way of -preparing them for Distension? The Men -absolutely <i>counteract</i> the very end they pretend -to have in view, by Dilatation!—Friction -must irritate—irritation must inflame—Inflammation -must <i>contract</i>. It -is no Wonder if Parts so nicely constructed—highly -irritated for (perhaps) Hours, -should inflame after the Birth, and be productive -of the most dreadful Consequences!—Yet -their <i>Officiousness</i> recommends -them to the Ladies!—I really cannot -find Words to inform my Readers -of every Circumstance I wish to relate. I -start Hints—and leave them to pursue -the Subject by an exertion of their own -Reason.</p> - -<p><span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_63"></a>[63]</span></p> - -<p>I have now entirely done with all which -relates to the Danger Women and Children -run through <i>officious</i>, shameful <i>Impatience</i>. -I have only to recommend one -serious Reflection to those Husbands who -think their Happiness would be interrupted -by detecting any Infidelity in their -Wives. I beg they will consider <i>the Advantages</i> -they give Men-midwives, in allowing -them so many <i>favourable</i> Opportunities -of <i>extolling the personal</i> Charms of -the Ladies, <i>whose Beauties</i> lie open to their -<i>most curious</i> Researches. No Men can -possibly have <i>such critical</i> Opportunities for -engratiating themselves with the Fair. -<i>Flattery, <span class="smcap">critically</span> applied</i> to Women, -has strange Effects. They can <i>accompany</i> -their Flattery with <i>irresistible</i> Persuasives. -The sacred Names of Religion and Honour -<i>may</i> be made <i>Subservient</i> to their Purposes. -The more they are pretended to be -prized in their Estimation, the more <i>they -may be urged in proof</i> of the <i>bewitching</i> Allurements, -and <i>forcible</i> Power of those -hidden Beauties, which have obliterated -every Remonstrance of Virtue, and stifled<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_64"></a>[64]</span> -every Check of Conscience. The poor -Woman’s <i>Pity</i> is excited, when she views -the strongest Principles of her “dear -Man” overcome by <i>her</i> Charms—she can -only blame <i>herself</i> for possessing <i>such provoking -Temptations</i>—she is blinded by the -Assistance of Nature—<i>her own Vanity</i> turns -Advocate for the Doctor, and acquits him -of Villainy <i>during the Empire of Passion</i>; -though the <i>return</i> of Reason, <i>when too -late</i>! discovers the Artifices which have -accomplish’d her Ruin!</p> - -<p class="right">THE AUTHOR.</p> - -<p>I hope Doctor Hunter will pardon <i>the -latter</i> part of the Reference, at the bottom -of my second Letter. I fear I misrepresented -him in attributing Infirmities to -his share which I am inform’d he never -yet has experienced. His <i>Abilities</i> are -great—and if a Man <i>must</i> be employ’d, -I think he may be called in with as much -safety as any Man of his Profession.</p> - -<hr class="chap x-ebookmaker-drop" /> - -<p>☞ <i>As this Pamphlet recommends the -employing of Women, the Publishers have -taken some Pains to procure a List of those -who are eminent in their Profession—and on -the best information recommend the following -Midwives to those Ladies who have too -much Modesty to employ Men—and who are -convinced by the preceding Pages that the -Men are not so safe as Women.</i></p> - -<table> - <tr class="row"> - <td>Mrs. Nihell</td> - <td></td> - <td><i>Hay Market</i></td> - </tr> - <tr class="row"> - <td>Mrs. Brooke</td> - <td>}</td> - <td rowspan="3" class="valign"><i>Cross Key Court, Little Britain</i></td> - </tr> - <tr> - <td>Mrs. Stephens</td> - <td>}</td> - </tr> - <tr> - <td>Mrs. Lee</td> - <td>}</td> - </tr> - <tr class="row"> - <td>Mrs. Harris</td> - <td></td> - <td><i>Mould Makers Row, St. Martin’s Le Grand</i></td> - </tr> - <tr class="row"> - <td>Mrs. Reynard</td> - <td>}</td> - <td rowspan="2" class="valign"><i>Bartholomew Close</i></td> - </tr> - <tr> - <td>Mrs. Forrest</td> - <td>}</td> - </tr> - <tr class="row"> - <td>Mrs. Smith</td> - <td>}</td> - <td rowspan="2" class="valign"><i>Cow Lane, Snow-Hill</i></td> - </tr> - <tr> - <td>Mrs. Page</td> - <td>}</td> - </tr> - <tr class="row"> - <td>Mrs. Phillips</td> - <td></td> - <td><i>Garlick Hill</i></td> - </tr> - <tr class="row"> - <td>Mrs. Andrews</td> - <td></td> - <td><i>Bush Lane, Cannon Street</i></td> - </tr> - <tr class="row"> - <td>Mrs. Longbottom</td> - <td></td> - <td><i>Near Guy’s Hospital</i></td> - </tr> - <tr class="row"> - <td>Mrs. Richardson</td> - <td></td> - <td><i>Westminster</i></td> - </tr> - <tr class="row"> - <td>Mrs. Souden</td> - <td></td> - <td><i>Ratcliff Row, Old Street</i></td> - </tr> - <tr class="row"> - <td>Mrs. Hall</td> - <td></td> - <td><i>Bunhill Row, Ditto</i></td> - </tr> - <tr class="row"> - <td>Mrs. Barnet</td> - <td>}</td> - <td rowspan="2" class="valign"><i>Somerset Street, White-Chapel</i></td> - </tr> - <tr> - <td>Mrs. Larkin</td> - <td>}</td> - </tr> - <tr class="row"> - <td>Mrs. Blunt</td> - <td></td> - <td><i>Swallow Str. Golden Sq.</i></td> - </tr> - <tr class="row"> - <td>Mrs. Lyttelton,</td> - <td></td> - <td><i>Amen-Corner, Paternoster Row</i></td> - </tr> -</table> - -<p class="center"><span class="gesperrt">FINIS</span>.</p> - -<div style='display:block; margin-top:4em'>*** END OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE DANGER AND IMMODESTY OF THE PRESENT TOO GENERAL CUSTOM OF UNNECESSARILY EMPLOYING MEN-MIDWIVES. ***</div> -<div style='text-align:left'> - -<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> -Updated editions will replace the previous one—the old editions will -be renamed. -</div> - -<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> -Creating the works from print editions not protected by U.S. copyright -law means that no one owns a United States copyright in these works, -so the Foundation (and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United -States without permission and without paying copyright -royalties. Special rules, set forth in the General Terms of Use part -of this license, apply to copying and distributing Project -Gutenberg™ electronic works to protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG™ -concept and trademark. Project Gutenberg is a registered trademark, -and may not be used if you charge for an eBook, except by following -the terms of the trademark license, including paying royalties for use -of the Project Gutenberg trademark. If you do not charge anything for -copies of this eBook, complying with the trademark license is very -easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose such as creation -of derivative works, reports, performances and research. Project -Gutenberg eBooks may be modified and printed and given away—you may -do practically ANYTHING in the United States with eBooks not protected -by U.S. copyright law. Redistribution is subject to the trademark -license, especially commercial redistribution. -</div> - -<div style='margin-top:1em; font-size:1.1em; text-align:center'>START: FULL LICENSE</div> -<div style='text-align:center;font-size:0.9em'>THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE</div> -<div style='text-align:center;font-size:0.9em'>PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK</div> - -<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> -To protect the Project Gutenberg™ mission of promoting the free -distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work -(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase “Project -Gutenberg”), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full -Project Gutenberg™ License available with this file or online at -www.gutenberg.org/license. -</div> - -<div style='display:block; font-size:1.1em; margin:1em 0; font-weight:bold'> -Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg™ electronic works -</div> - -<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> -1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg™ -electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to -and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property -(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all -the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or -destroy all copies of Project Gutenberg™ electronic works in your -possession. If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a -Project Gutenberg™ electronic work and you do not agree to be bound -by the terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person -or entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8. -</div> - -<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> -1.B. “Project Gutenberg” is a registered trademark. It may only be -used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who -agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few -things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg™ electronic works -even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See -paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project -Gutenberg™ electronic works if you follow the terms of this -agreement and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg™ -electronic works. See paragraph 1.E below. -</div> - -<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> -1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation (“the -Foundation” or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection -of Project Gutenberg™ electronic works. Nearly all the individual -works in the collection are in the public domain in the United -States. If an individual work is unprotected by copyright law in the -United States and you are located in the United States, we do not -claim a right to prevent you from copying, distributing, performing, -displaying or creating derivative works based on the work as long as -all references to Project Gutenberg are removed. Of course, we hope -that you will support the Project Gutenberg™ mission of promoting -free access to electronic works by freely sharing Project Gutenberg™ -works in compliance with the terms of this agreement for keeping the -Project Gutenberg™ name associated with the work. You can easily -comply with the terms of this agreement by keeping this work in the -same format with its attached full Project Gutenberg™ License when -you share it without charge with others. -</div> - -<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> -1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern -what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are -in a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States, -check the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this -agreement before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, -distributing or creating derivative works based on this work or any -other Project Gutenberg™ work. The Foundation makes no -representations concerning the copyright status of any work in any -country other than the United States. -</div> - -<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> -1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg: -</div> - -<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> -1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other -immediate access to, the full Project Gutenberg™ License must appear -prominently whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg™ work (any work -on which the phrase “Project Gutenberg” appears, or with which the -phrase “Project Gutenberg” is associated) is accessed, displayed, -performed, viewed, copied or distributed: -</div> - -<blockquote> - <div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> - This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States and most - other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no restrictions - whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms - of the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online - at <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org">www.gutenberg.org</a>. If you - are not located in the United States, you will have to check the laws - of the country where you are located before using this eBook. - </div> -</blockquote> - -<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> -1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg™ electronic work is -derived from texts not protected by U.S. copyright law (does not -contain a notice indicating that it is posted with permission of the -copyright holder), the work can be copied and distributed to anyone in -the United States without paying any fees or charges. If you are -redistributing or providing access to a work with the phrase “Project -Gutenberg” associated with or appearing on the work, you must comply -either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 or -obtain permission for the use of the work and the Project Gutenberg™ -trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or 1.E.9. -</div> - -<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> -1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg™ electronic work is posted -with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution -must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any -additional terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms -will be linked to the Project Gutenberg™ License for all works -posted with the permission of the copyright holder found at the -beginning of this work. -</div> - -<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> -1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg™ -License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this -work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg™. -</div> - -<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> -1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this -electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without -prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with -active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project -Gutenberg™ License. -</div> - -<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> -1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary, -compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including -any word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access -to or distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg™ work in a format -other than “Plain Vanilla ASCII” or other format used in the official -version posted on the official Project Gutenberg™ website -(www.gutenberg.org), you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense -to the user, provide a copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means -of obtaining a copy upon request, of the work in its original “Plain -Vanilla ASCII” or other form. Any alternate format must include the -full Project Gutenberg™ License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1. -</div> - -<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> -1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying, -performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg™ works -unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9. -</div> - -<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> -1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing -access to or distributing Project Gutenberg™ electronic works -provided that: -</div> - -<div style='margin-left:0.7em;'> - <div style='text-indent:-0.7em'> - • You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from - the use of Project Gutenberg™ works calculated using the method - you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is owed - to the owner of the Project Gutenberg™ trademark, but he has - agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the Project - Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments must be paid - within 60 days following each date on which you prepare (or are - legally required to prepare) your periodic tax returns. Royalty - payments should be clearly marked as such and sent to the Project - Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the address specified in - Section 4, “Information about donations to the Project Gutenberg - Literary Archive Foundation.” - </div> - - <div style='text-indent:-0.7em'> - • You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies - you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he - does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg™ - License. You must require such a user to return or destroy all - copies of the works possessed in a physical medium and discontinue - all use of and all access to other copies of Project Gutenberg™ - works. - </div> - - <div style='text-indent:-0.7em'> - • You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of - any money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the - electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days of - receipt of the work. - </div> - - <div style='text-indent:-0.7em'> - • You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free - distribution of Project Gutenberg™ works. - </div> -</div> - -<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> -1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project -Gutenberg™ electronic work or group of works on different terms than -are set forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing -from the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the manager of -the Project Gutenberg™ trademark. Contact the Foundation as set -forth in Section 3 below. -</div> - -<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> -1.F. -</div> - -<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> -1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable -effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread -works not protected by U.S. copyright law in creating the Project -Gutenberg™ collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg™ -electronic works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may -contain “Defects,” such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate -or corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other -intellectual property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or -other medium, a computer virus, or computer codes that damage or -cannot be read by your equipment. -</div> - -<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> -1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the “Right -of Replacement or Refund” described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project -Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project -Gutenberg™ trademark, and any other party distributing a Project -Gutenberg™ electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all -liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal -fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT -LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE -PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE -TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE -LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR -INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH -DAMAGE. -</div> - -<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> -1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a -defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can -receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a -written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you -received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium -with your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you -with the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in -lieu of a refund. If you received the work electronically, the person -or entity providing it to you may choose to give you a second -opportunity to receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If -the second copy is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing -without further opportunities to fix the problem. -</div> - -<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> -1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth -in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you ‘AS-IS’, WITH NO -OTHER WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT -LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE. -</div> - -<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> -1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied -warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of -damages. If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement -violates the law of the state applicable to this agreement, the -agreement shall be interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or -limitation permitted by the applicable state law. The invalidity or -unenforceability of any provision of this agreement shall not void the -remaining provisions. -</div> - -<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> -1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the -trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone -providing copies of Project Gutenberg™ electronic works in -accordance with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the -production, promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg™ -electronic works, harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, -including legal fees, that arise directly or indirectly from any of -the following which you do or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this -or any Project Gutenberg™ work, (b) alteration, modification, or -additions or deletions to any Project Gutenberg™ work, and (c) any -Defect you cause. -</div> - -<div style='display:block; font-size:1.1em; margin:1em 0; font-weight:bold'> -Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg™ -</div> - -<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> -Project Gutenberg™ is synonymous with the free distribution of -electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of -computers including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It -exists because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations -from people in all walks of life. -</div> - -<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> -Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the -assistance they need are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg™’s -goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg™ collection will -remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project -Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure -and permanent future for Project Gutenberg™ and future -generations. To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary -Archive Foundation and how your efforts and donations can help, see -Sections 3 and 4 and the Foundation information page at www.gutenberg.org. -</div> - -<div style='display:block; font-size:1.1em; margin:1em 0; font-weight:bold'> -Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation -</div> - -<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> -The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non-profit -501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the -state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal -Revenue Service. The Foundation’s EIN or federal tax identification -number is 64-6221541. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg Literary -Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent permitted by -U.S. federal laws and your state’s laws. -</div> - -<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> -The Foundation’s business office is located at 809 North 1500 West, -Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887. Email contact links and up -to date contact information can be found at the Foundation’s website -and official page at www.gutenberg.org/contact -</div> - -<div style='display:block; font-size:1.1em; margin:1em 0; font-weight:bold'> -Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation -</div> - -<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> -Project Gutenberg™ depends upon and cannot survive without widespread -public support and donations to carry out its mission of -increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be -freely distributed in machine-readable form accessible by the widest -array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations -($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt -status with the IRS. -</div> - -<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> -The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating -charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United -States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a -considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up -with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations -where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To SEND -DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any particular state -visit <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/donate/">www.gutenberg.org/donate</a>. -</div> - -<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> -While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we -have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition -against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who -approach us with offers to donate. -</div> - -<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> -International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make -any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from -outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff. -</div> - -<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> -Please check the Project Gutenberg web pages for current donation -methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other -ways including checks, online payments and credit card donations. To -donate, please visit: www.gutenberg.org/donate -</div> - -<div style='display:block; font-size:1.1em; margin:1em 0; font-weight:bold'> -Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg™ electronic works -</div> - -<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> -Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project -Gutenberg™ concept of a library of electronic works that could be -freely shared with anyone. For forty years, he produced and -distributed Project Gutenberg™ eBooks with only a loose network of -volunteer support. -</div> - -<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> -Project Gutenberg™ eBooks are often created from several printed -editions, all of which are confirmed as not protected by copyright in -the U.S. unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not -necessarily keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper -edition. -</div> - -<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> -Most people start at our website which has the main PG search -facility: <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org">www.gutenberg.org</a>. -</div> - -<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> -This website includes information about Project Gutenberg™, -including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary -Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to -subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks. -</div> - -</div> -</body> -</html> diff --git a/old/68756-h/images/cover.jpg b/old/68756-h/images/cover.jpg Binary files differdeleted file mode 100644 index b42adfd..0000000 --- a/old/68756-h/images/cover.jpg +++ /dev/null |
