summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
-rw-r--r--.gitattributes4
-rw-r--r--LICENSE.txt11
-rw-r--r--README.md2
-rw-r--r--old/66049-0.txt5927
-rw-r--r--old/66049-0.zipbin125882 -> 0 bytes
-rw-r--r--old/66049-h.zipbin5752221 -> 0 bytes
-rw-r--r--old/66049-h/66049-h.htm7939
-rw-r--r--old/66049-h/images/cover.jpgbin246236 -> 0 bytes
-rw-r--r--old/66049-h/images/i_001.pngbin7730 -> 0 bytes
-rw-r--r--old/66049-h/images/i_003.jpgbin260781 -> 0 bytes
-rw-r--r--old/66049-h/images/i_011.jpgbin257623 -> 0 bytes
-rw-r--r--old/66049-h/images/i_021.jpgbin256143 -> 0 bytes
-rw-r--r--old/66049-h/images/i_028a.jpgbin260610 -> 0 bytes
-rw-r--r--old/66049-h/images/i_028b.pngbin143793 -> 0 bytes
-rw-r--r--old/66049-h/images/i_039a.jpgbin260736 -> 0 bytes
-rw-r--r--old/66049-h/images/i_039b.pngbin31982 -> 0 bytes
-rw-r--r--old/66049-h/images/i_045.jpgbin252670 -> 0 bytes
-rw-r--r--old/66049-h/images/i_055a.jpgbin260896 -> 0 bytes
-rw-r--r--old/66049-h/images/i_055b.jpgbin261089 -> 0 bytes
-rw-r--r--old/66049-h/images/i_057.jpgbin257414 -> 0 bytes
-rw-r--r--old/66049-h/images/i_061.jpgbin257626 -> 0 bytes
-rw-r--r--old/66049-h/images/i_064a.jpgbin260587 -> 0 bytes
-rw-r--r--old/66049-h/images/i_064b.pngbin152451 -> 0 bytes
-rw-r--r--old/66049-h/images/i_071.jpgbin255268 -> 0 bytes
-rw-r--r--old/66049-h/images/i_076.jpgbin259348 -> 0 bytes
-rw-r--r--old/66049-h/images/i_079a.jpgbin260683 -> 0 bytes
-rw-r--r--old/66049-h/images/i_079b.jpgbin260876 -> 0 bytes
-rw-r--r--old/66049-h/images/i_093.jpgbin257278 -> 0 bytes
-rw-r--r--old/66049-h/images/i_100a.jpgbin258614 -> 0 bytes
-rw-r--r--old/66049-h/images/i_100b.jpgbin258619 -> 0 bytes
-rw-r--r--old/66049-h/images/i_133.jpgbin260968 -> 0 bytes
-rw-r--r--old/66049-h/images/i_163.jpgbin260074 -> 0 bytes
-rw-r--r--old/66049-h/images/i_179.jpgbin256542 -> 0 bytes
33 files changed, 17 insertions, 13866 deletions
diff --git a/.gitattributes b/.gitattributes
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..d7b82bc
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.gitattributes
@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
+*.txt text eol=lf
+*.htm text eol=lf
+*.html text eol=lf
+*.md text eol=lf
diff --git a/LICENSE.txt b/LICENSE.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..6312041
--- /dev/null
+++ b/LICENSE.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+This eBook, including all associated images, markup, improvements,
+metadata, and any other content or labor, has been confirmed to be
+in the PUBLIC DOMAIN IN THE UNITED STATES.
+
+Procedures for determining public domain status are described in
+the "Copyright How-To" at https://www.gutenberg.org.
+
+No investigation has been made concerning possible copyrights in
+jurisdictions other than the United States. Anyone seeking to utilize
+this eBook outside of the United States should confirm copyright
+status under the laws that apply to them.
diff --git a/README.md b/README.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..271f780
--- /dev/null
+++ b/README.md
@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
+Project Gutenberg (https://www.gutenberg.org) public repository for
+eBook #66049 (https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/66049)
diff --git a/old/66049-0.txt b/old/66049-0.txt
deleted file mode 100644
index 52a6b6e..0000000
--- a/old/66049-0.txt
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,5927 +0,0 @@
-The Project Gutenberg eBook of Pictorial Beauty on the Screen, by
-Victor Oscar Freeburg
-
-This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States and
-most other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no restrictions
-whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms
-of the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online at
-www.gutenberg.org. If you are not located in the United States, you
-will have to check the laws of the country where you are located before
-using this eBook.
-
-Title: Pictorial Beauty on the Screen
-
-Author: Victor Oscar Freeburg
-
-Contributor: Rex Ingram
-
-Release Date: August 12, 2021 [eBook #66049]
-
-Language: English
-
-Produced by: Charlene Taylor, Charlie Howard, and the Online Distributed
- Proofreading Team at https://www.pgdp.net (This file was
- produced from images generously made available by The
- Internet Archive/American Libraries.)
-
-*** START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK PICTORIAL BEAUTY ON THE
-SCREEN ***
-
-
-
-
-
-PICTORIAL BEAUTY ON THE SCREEN
-
-
-
-
-[Illustration]
-
- THE MACMILLAN COMPANY
-
- NEW YORK · BOSTON · CHICAGO · DALLAS
- ATLANTA · SAN FRANCISCO
-
- MACMILLAN & CO., LIMITED
-
- LONDON · BOMBAY · CALCUTTA
- MELBOURNE
-
- THE MACMILLAN CO. OF CANADA, LTD.
- TORONTO
-
-[Illustration: From _The Covered Wagon_. The rich variety of light and
-shadow in this scene, combined with the simple strength of the moving
-pattern, makes it one of the most charming sections in a remarkable
-photoplay. See pages 9, 66 and 140.]
-
-
-
-
- PICTORIAL BEAUTY
- ON THE SCREEN
-
-
- BY
-
- VICTOR OSCAR FREEBURG, PH.D.
-
- AUTHOR OF “THE ART OF PHOTOPLAY MAKING,” AND
- “DISGUISE PLOTS IN ELIZABETHAN DRAMA.”
-
-
- WITH A PREFATORY NOTE
- BY REX INGRAM
-
-
- New York
- THE MACMILLAN COMPANY
- 1923
- _All rights reserved_
-
-
-
-
- PRINTED IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.
-
-
- COPYRIGHT, 1923,
- BY THE MACMILLAN COMPANY.
-
- Set up and electrotyped. Published October, 1923.
-
-
-
-
- To
- JAMES CRUZE
-
-
-Because the Various Types of Pictorial Beauty Described in this Book
-May Be Seen Richly Blended with Epic Narrative and Stirring Drama in
-“The Covered Wagon,” a Cinema Composition That Will Live
-
-
-
-
-PREFATORY NOTE
-
-_By_ REX INGRAM, _Director of the “Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse,”
-“Scaramouche,” etc., etc._
-
-
-In this volume Dr. Freeburg contends that in order to be classified
-among the Arts, the Cinema must become something more than a series of
-clear photographs of things in motion.
-
-In other words, a motion picture must be composed of scenes that have
-certain pictorial qualifications, such as form, composition, and a
-proper distribution of light and shade.
-
-It is chiefly according to the degree in which these qualities are
-present in a picture, that it can register the full effectiveness of
-its drama, characterizations and atmosphere.
-
-Dr. Freeburg handles his subject clearly and comprehensively, and I
-know that the majority who read this book will gain a great deal more
-enjoyment than previously from productions of the calibre of “Broken
-Blossoms,” “Dr. Caligari,” “Blind Husbands,” “Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde,”
-“Nanook of the North,” and films more numerous than I can mention
-by such picture makers as Messrs. Griffith, Seastrom, Tourneur, Von
-Stroheim and Lubitsch.
-
- REX INGRAM.
-
-August 5th, 1923.
-
-
-
-
-AUTHOR’S PREFACE
-
-
-If I look upon a motion picture as a kind of substitute for some stage
-play or novel, it seems to me a poor thing, only a substitute for
-something better; but if I look upon it as something real in itself, a
-new form of pictorial art in which things have somehow been conjured
-into significant motion, then I get many a glimpse of touching beauty,
-and I always see a great range of possibilities for richer beauties in
-future examples of this new art. Then I see the motion picture as the
-equal of any of the elder arts.
-
-In other words, I enjoy the movies as pictures, and I do not enjoy
-them as anything else but pictures. Yet it is on the pictorial side
-that the movies are now in greatest need of improvement. And this need
-will probably continue for at least another ten years. I feel that a
-book such as this may prove to be of considerable help in bringing
-about that improvement. So far as I know, this is the first book in
-which a systematic analysis of pictorial composition on the screen has
-been attempted, although there are certain earlier books in which the
-pictorial art of the screen has been appraised without analysis, the
-pioneer work in that class being Vachel Lindsay’s “Art of the Moving
-Picture.” The most original things in my present volume are to be found
-in the chapters on “Pictorial Motions”--or, at least, they ought to be
-there, else I am to blame, because that is the phase of cinematic art
-which has hitherto received the least attention from critics.
-
-“Movie fans” in general are my audience, my hope being that they may
-find something new in this discussion, something, here and there, which
-they had not themselves thought of, but which will help them toward a
-conscious and keen enjoyment of beauty scarcely observed before, and
-to a more certain discrimination between genuine art on the screen and
-mere pretentious imitations of art.
-
-In order not to confuse the issue, I have purposely omitted discussions
-of plot, dramatic situation, characterization, etc., except where
-these matters are so intimately connected with pictorial form that an
-omission would be impossible. In short, it is what the picture looks
-like, rather than what it tells, which here occupies our attention.
-This study is, therefore, supplementary to my book “The Art of
-Photoplay Making,” which is published by The Macmillan Company.
-
-Mr. James O. Spearing, who was for five years the distinguished motion
-picture critic on the _New York Times_, and is now on the production
-staff of the Goldwyn Pictures Corporation, has been kind enough to
-criticize the manuscript of the present work, and I take pride in
-thanking him publicly for having thus served me with his extensive
-knowledge and cultivated taste.
-
- V. O. F.
-
-The National Arts Club, New York City, August 27th, 1923.
-
-
-
-
-CONTENTS
-
-
- CHAP. PAGE
- I. PICTORIAL ART IN THE MOVIES 1
-
- II. THE PRACTICAL VALUE OF PICTORIAL COMPOSITION 9
-
- III. EYE TESTS FOR BEAUTY 25
-
- IV. PICTORIAL FORCE IN FIXED PATTERNS 50
-
- V. RHYTHM AND REPOSE IN FIXED DESIGN 68
-
- VI. MOTIONS IN A PICTURE 83
-
- VII. PICTORIAL MOTIONS AT WORK 97
-
- VIII. PICTORIAL MOTIONS AT PLAY 116
-
- IX. PICTORIAL MOTIONS AT REST 128
-
- X. MASTERY IN THE MOVIES 154
-
- XI. THE MYSTERIOUS EMOTIONS OF ART 178
-
-
-
-
-LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS
-
-
- “The Covered Wagon.” Prairie Scene _Frontispiece_
-
- FACING
- PAGE
-
- “The Plough Girl” 11
-
- “The Shepherdess.” By LeRolle 21
-
- “The Spell of the Yukon.” Cabin Scene 28
-
- A Study of Composition in “The Spell of the Yukon” 28
-
- “Daylight and Lamplight.” By Paxton 39
-
- A Study of Lines 39
-
- “Audrey” 45
-
- A Still Illustrating Misplaced Emphasis 55
-
- A Specimen of Bad Composition 55
-
- “The Spell of the Yukon.” Exterior 57
-
- A Triangle Pattern 61
-
- “Derby Day.” By Rowlandson 64
-
- A Study of Composition in “Derby Day” 64
-
- “Maria Rosa” 71
-
- “Mme. LeBrun and Her Daughter.” By Mme. LeBrun 76
-
- “Polly of the Circus” 79
-
- “Banquet of the Officers of St. Andrew.” By Hals 79
-
- “The Covered Wagon.” Arroyo Scene 93
-
- A Typical Bad Movie Composition 100
-
- “Sherlock Holmes” 100
-
- “The Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse” 133
-
- “Portrait of Charles I.” By Van Dyck 163
-
- “The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari” 179
-
-
-
-
-Pictorial Beauty On the Screen
-
-
-
-
-CHAPTER I
-
-PICTORIAL ART IN THE MOVIES
-
-
-Vast armies of “movie fans” in massed formation move in and out of the
-theaters day after day and night after night. They may be trampled on,
-stumbled over, suffocated; they may have to wait wearily for seats and
-even for a glimpse of the screen, and yet they come, drawn by a lure
-which they never dream of denying. Yet the individuals in these crowds
-are not the helpless victims of mob impulses. Choose the average person
-among them, and you will find that he is able to criticize what he
-sees. He has developed no small degree of artistic taste during all the
-hundreds of nights which he has spent with eyes fixed upon the screen.
-He can, at least, tell the difference between a dull, common-place plot
-and one that is original and thrilling. He can distinguish between
-the reasonable and the ridiculous. He is perfectly aware that much of
-what he sees is plain “bunk,” that it is false, or silly, or of no
-consequence; and yet, after waiting patiently, he is quick to catch
-the honest message of significant truth when it comes. He is trained
-in the appreciation of screen acting, and does not confuse mere showy
-performance with sincere, sympathetic interpretation of a dramatic
-character. And now, at last, the “average movie fan” is beginning to
-demand that motion pictures have real pictorial beauty, that they be
-something more than clear photographs of things in motion.
-
-Here we have struck the measure of the motion picture’s possibilities
-as a new art. The masses who pay for tickets have the situation
-entirely in their hands. Photoplays are improving year by year
-principally because the public wants better photoplays year by year.
-When the movies were new, people were satisfied with novelties,
-mechanical tricks, sensational “stunts,” pictures of sensational
-people, pictures of pretty places, etc., but, although they appreciated
-what was called good photography, they expressed no craving for genuine
-pictorial beauty. Later on came the craze for adaptations of popular
-novels and stage plays to the screen. This was really a great step
-forward. The motion picture was no longer a mere toy or trick, but
-was being looked upon as a real art medium. The public had developed
-a taste for the exciting, clearly told story, and this demand was
-satisfied by hundreds of excellent photoplays--excellent, at least,
-according to the standards of the day. Yet the “fans” might have asked
-for more. They got the story of a famous novel or play, with fairly
-well acted interpretations by screen folk in proper costumes, and with
-scenes and settings that usually answered to the descriptions in the
-literary work adapted; they even got, here and there, a “pretty” view
-or a chance grouping of striking beauty, but they did not regularly
-get, or ask for, the kind of beauty which we are accustomed to find in
-the masterpieces of painting. But taste has been developed by tasting,
-and at last the craving for pictorial art has come.
-
-Along with this new public demand for better pictorial qualities in
-the motion pictures have come higher ideals to those who make and
-distribute motion pictures. The producers are awakening to their
-opportunities. They are no longer content with resurrecting defunct
-stage plays and picturizing them hurriedly, with only enough additions
-to the bare plot to make the photoplay last five reels. It is not now
-so much a question of fixing over something old, as of constructing
-something new. They are beginning to think in terms of pictorial
-motion. The directors, too--those who have not been forced out of the
-studios by their lack of ability--have learned their art of pictorial
-composition in much the same way as the public has developed its
-taste, that is, by experience. Once they seemed to think that it was
-enough to tell the heroine when to sob or raise her eyebrows; now
-they realize that the lines and pattern of the entire figure should
-be pictorially related to every other line and pattern which is to be
-recorded by the camera and shown upon the screen. And, finally, along
-with the director’s rise in power and importance is coming the better
-subordination of the “stars,” and yet they shine not the less brightly
-on the screen.
-
-The early exhibitors were often accused of being “ballyhoo” men,
-hawking their wares of more or less questionable character. Most of
-them, indeed, never suspected that motion pictures might contain
-beauty. Now the worst of them can at least be classed with picture
-dealers who value their goods because others love them, while the best,
-including such men as Dr. Hugo Riesenfeld, have made exhibition itself
-a new art. They select pictures with conscientious taste, place them in
-a harmonious program, and show them in a theatrical setting that gives
-the right mood for æsthetic appreciation on the part of the audience.
-
-Publicity men, too, have felt the temper of the public. Although they
-still like to exploit sensational features, the language of art is
-creeping into their “dope.” They are beginning to find phrases for the
-kind of beauty in a film which does not come from a ravishing “star”
-or the lavish expenditure of money. And the independent reviewers
-whose criticisms are published in the newspapers and magazines have
-become professional. There was a time when they contented themselves
-with listing the cast, revealing the plot in a paragraph, and adding
-that “the photography is excellent.” But now we find thoughtful,
-discriminating criticisms of photoplays in the film magazines and in
-the leading daily papers of the country. These critics have learned
-how to analyze the narrative as a dramatic construction, and how to
-evaluate the interpretation of character in the acting, but they
-have also learned something else, and this belongs to the new epoch
-in the development of the photoplay; they have begun to observe the
-pictorial art in motion pictures, the endless possibilities of beauty
-in the pictorial combination of figure, setting, and action; in the
-arrangement of lines and masses, of lights and shadows, and in the
-fascinating rhythms of movement on the screen.
-
-This conscious desire for beauty on the screen, which is springing
-up all along the line, from the producer to the ultimate “fan,” has
-naturally led to public discussion. In school room and church, on “lot”
-and “location,” in office and studio, in club or casual group, men and
-women are trying to find words and phrases to express the cinematic
-beauty which they have sensed. And by that discussion they are
-sharpening their senses for the discovery of richer beauty in the films
-that are to come. My contribution to that discussion has taken the
-form of this book, and my aim has been, first, to collect the topics
-which are connected with the purely pictorial side of the movies,
-and, second, to formulate my conception of some of the principles
-which govern the creation of pictorial beauty on the screen. I have
-endeavored to see my subject from various angles, assuming at times the
-position of the sensitive spectator and at times standing, as it were,
-beside the average director, and presuming to suggest to him what he
-ought to do to please that spectator.
-
-To begin with, let us take care to avoid some of the common pitfalls of
-photoplay criticism. It has been a common error to judge a photoplay
-as though it were a kind of visualized book. Many of us have slipped
-into the mistake of expecting motion photographs to give us the same
-kind of pleasure which we get from printed or spoken words. But let us
-understand from now on that the beauty of a design-and-motion art must
-of necessity be quite different from the beauty of a word-and-voice art.
-
-This means that we shall have to get out of the habit of using
-expressions like “He is _writing_ a photoplay.” A writer might indeed
-devise a story for a motion picture play, as he might originate and
-describe an idea for a painting, but it would not in either case be
-proper to say that he had _written_ the picture. This book is not a
-study of words, phrases, sentences, paragraphs, etc. It does not deal
-with literary expression. It deals with fixed and moving designs, the
-things which the spectator actually sees, the only forms which actually
-hold and present the contents of a photoplay. At times we shall, of
-course, be obliged to say something about the familiar “sub-titles,”
-which interrupt the pictorial flow in a film. But word-forms are
-not characteristic photoplay forms. Fundamentally, a photoplay is a
-sequence of motion pictures, and a man can no more write those pictures
-than he can write a row of paintings on a wall. However, it would be
-unfair to say that a writer could not in some way lend a hand in the
-making of a motion picture; we merely insist that the finished picture
-should not be judged as writing.
-
-We must also get rid of the notion that “photoplays are _acted_.” It
-would hardly be further from the truth to say that paintings are posed.
-A finished painting may, in fact, contain the image of some person who
-has posed for the artist; but the painting contains something else far
-more significant. We cannot thank Raphael’s model for the beauty of
-“The Sistine Madonna,” nor can we thank Charles I. of England for the
-beauty of Van Dyck’s portraits of him. Turning to movies, it must be
-admitted that actors are tremendously important, but it must not be
-said that they act motion pictures. They only act while motion pictures
-are being made. We cannot thank them for the poignant beauty of glowing
-lights and falling shadows, of flowing lines, and melting forms, and
-all that strange evanescence that makes up the lure of cinematic forms.
-
-Also we must reject the theory that the artistic quality of a
-photoplay can be guaranteed by engaging so-called art directors who
-design backgrounds or select natural settings for the action of the
-film story. The picture which we see on the screen consists not of
-backgrounds alone; it is rather an ever-varying design of moving
-figures combined with a fixed or changing background. If an art
-director limits his work to the preparation of material environment
-of photoplay action, he is, by definition, responsible only for the
-place-element in the motion picture. Even if he were to design costumes
-and general equipment for the players he would still be responsible for
-only a part of the pictorial elements that appear upon the screen.
-
-Plot, performers, places, equipment--these are only the materials which
-a picture-maker puts into cinematic forms. The art does not lie in the
-separate materials; it lies in the organization of those materials, a
-process which may be called cinema composition.[A] In a later chapter
-we shall discuss the proposition that the motion picture director is,
-or certainly should be, the master cinema composer. Here we simply
-want to make the point that criticism should concern itself with the
-finished composition as a whole and not with the parts alone. The
-critic who is interested only in the plot construction of photoplays
-may indeed be able to make penetrating comment upon such dramatic
-qualities as suspense, logic, etc., but he cannot thereby give us any
-information on those visual aspects which please or displease the eye
-while the picture is showing. Thus also the critic who looks only at
-the acting in the photoplay is likely to be misled and to mislead us.
-He may not observe, for example, that a film which has bad joining of
-scenes, or a bad combination of figure and setting, is a bad cinema
-composition, however superb the acting may be. And the critic who
-writes, “The photography is excellent,”--a rubber-stamp criticism--is
-of no help to art-lovers, because the photography as such may indeed
-be excellent while the composition of the scenes photographed is
-atrocious. Cinema criticism, to be of any real value to the “movie
-fan,” must be complete. And that means that he must be enlightened
-concerning the nature of pictorial design and pictorial progression,
-as well as concerning the plot, the acting, and the mechanics of
-photography.
-
- [A] The terms “cinema composer” and “cinema composition” were
- devised by the author in 1916, at the time when he and his
- students founded the Cinema Composers Club at Columbia
- University.
-
-All of us are beginners in this pioneer work of analyzing the motion
-picture as a design-and-motion art. But the prize is well worth the
-adventure. Certainly the danger of making mistakes need not alarm us
-unduly, for even a mistake may be interesting and helpful. At the start
-we need to sharpen our insight by learning as much about the grammar of
-pictorial art as we know about the grammar of language, by respecting
-the logic of line and tone as highly as the logic of fictitious events,
-by paying tribute to originality in the pattern of pictorial motions
-no less than to the novelty in fresh dramatic situations. Beyond that
-the prospect is alluring. Our new understanding will give us greater
-enjoyment of the pictorial beauty which even now comes to the screen,
-and the rumor of that enjoyment, sounding through the studios, will
-assure of us of still greater beauty in the future.
-
-
-
-
-CHAPTER II
-
-THE PRACTICAL VALUE OF PICTORIAL COMPOSITION
-
-
-The production manager of a large motion picture studio in New York
-once declared to the author that he was “against artistry in the movies
-because it usually spoils the picture.” “Emotion’s what gets ’em, not
-art,” he added. “Besides, a director has to shoot thirty or forty
-scenes a day, and hasn’t got any time to fool away with art notions.”
-
-Any one who has seen “The Covered Wagon” (directed by James Cruze for
-the Famous Players-Lasky Corporation) knows that such talk is nonsense.
-This remarkable photoplay charms the eye, appeals to the imagination,
-and stirs the emotions--all in the same “shot.” One can never forget
-the pictorial beauty in those magnificent expanses of barren prairie,
-traversed by the long train of covered wagons, a white line winding
-in slow rhythm, while a softly rising cloud of dust blends the tones
-of the curving canvas tops and of the wind-blown sage brush. Again
-and again the wagon train becomes a striking pictorial motif, and,
-whether it is seen creeping across the prairie, following the bank of
-a river, climbing toward a pass in the mountains, stretching out, a
-thin black chain of silhouettes on the horizon, curving itself along
-the palisade-like walls of an arroyo, or halted in snow against a
-background of Oregon pines, it always adds emphasis to the intense
-drama of the pioneers battling against the hardships of the trail in
-’48 and ’49. Here is entrancing change and flow of pattern, but here is
-human striving and performance, too; and the emotions of the audience
-are touched more directly and more deeply because picture and drama
-have been fused into a single art.
-
-Shortly after “The Covered Wagon” had opened in New York an executive
-of a certain film company was heard to remark, “Well, no wonder it’s
-a success. It cost $700,000 to make it! Any one could take that much
-money and make a great picture.” I consider that reflection highly
-unjust and the argument entirely fallacious. Good pictorial composition
-does not necessarily cost a cent more than bad composition. In fact,
-it will be shown in the following chapters that a scene of cinematic
-beauty often costs less than an ordinary arrangement of the same scene.
-
-The pictorial beauty discussed in this book is really a kind of
-pictorial efficiency, and therefore must have practical, economic
-value. When a motion picture is well composed it pleases the eye, its
-meaning is easily understood, and the emotion it contains is quickly
-and forcefully conveyed. In short, it has the power of art.
-
-Pictorial efficiency cannot be bought. It cannot be guaranteed by the
-possession of expensive cameras and other mechanical equipment. The
-camera has no sense, no soul, no capacity for selecting, emphasizing,
-and interpreting the pictorial subject for the benefit of the
-spectator. In fact, the camera is positively stupid, because it always
-shows more than is necessary; it often emphasizes the wrong thing,
-and it is notoriously blind to beautiful significance. You who
-carry kodaks for the purpose of getting souvenirs of your travels
-have perhaps often been surprised, when the films were developed, to
-discover some very conspicuous object, ugly and jarring, which you had
-not noticed at the time when the picture was taken. At that time your
-mind had forced your eye to ignore all that was not interesting and
-beautiful, but the camera had made no such choice.
-
-[Illustration: From _The Plough Girl_. The pictorial composition at
-this moment of the action is bad because the spectator’s eye is not led
-instantly to the book, which is the most important dramatic interest in
-this scene. See page 11.]
-
-It will not help matters to buy a better lens for your camera and to
-be more careful of the focus next time. Such things can only make the
-images more sharp; they cannot alter the emphasis. Unfortunately there
-are still movie makers, and movie “fans,” too, in the world who have
-the notion that sharpness of photography, or “clearness,” as they call
-it, is a wonderful quality. But such people do not appreciate art; they
-merely appreciate machinery. To make the separate parts of a picture
-more distinct does not help us to see the total meaning more clearly.
-It may, in fact, prevent us from seeing.
-
-Let us look, for example, at the “still” reproduced on the opposite
-page. The picture is clear enough. We observe that it contains three
-figures and about a dozen objects. Our attention is caught by a
-conspicuous lamp, whose light falls upon a suspicious-looking jug, with
-its stopper not too tightly in. Yet these objects, emphasized as they
-are, have but slight importance indeed when compared with the book
-clutched in the man’s hand.
-
-This mistake in emphasis is not the fault of the camera; it is the
-fault of the director, who in the haste, or ignorance, perhaps, of
-days gone by, composed the picture so badly that the spectators are
-forced to look first at the wrong things, thus wasting time and energy
-before they can find the right things. On the screen, to be sure, the
-book attracts some attention because it is in motion, yet that does
-not suffice to draw our attention immediately away from the striking
-objects in the foreground. The primary interests should, of course,
-have been placed in the strongest light and in the most prominent
-position.
-
-Guiding the attention of the spectator properly helps him to understand
-what he is looking at, but it is still more important to help him feel
-what he is looking at. Movie producers used to have a great deal to
-say about the need of putting “punch” into a picture, of making it so
-strong that it would “hit the audience between the eyes.” Well, let
-those hot injunctions still be given. We maintain that good composition
-will make any motion picture “punch” harder, and that bad composition
-will weaken the “punch,” may, indeed, prevent its being felt at all.
-But before arguing that proposition, let us philosophize a bit over the
-manner in which a “punch” operates on our minds.
-
-Anything that impresses the human mind through the eye requires a
-three-fold expenditure of human energy. There is, first, the physical
-exertion of _looking_, then the mental exertion of _seeing_, that is,
-understanding what one looks at, and, finally, the joy of _feeling_,
-the pouring out of emotional energy. This last is the “punch,” the
-result which every artist aims to produce; but it can only be achieved
-through the spectator’s enjoyment of looking and seeing.
-
-Now, since the total human energy available at any one time for
-looking, seeing, and feeling is limited, it is clearly desirable to
-economize in the efforts of looking and seeing, in order to leave so
-much the more energy for emotional enjoyment. We shall discuss in the
-following chapter some of the things which waste our energies during
-the efforts of looking and seeing. Let us here consider how pictorial
-composition can control the expenditure of emotional energy, and how
-it may thus either help or hinder the spectator in his appreciation of
-beauty on the screen.
-
-Let us imagine an example of a typical “punch” picture and describe it
-here in words--inadequate though they may be--to illustrate how a bad
-arrangement of events and scenes may use up the spectator’s emotional
-energy before the story arrives at the event intended to furnish the
-main thrill. The “punch” in this case is to be the transfer of a man
-from one airplane to another. But many other things will disturb us on
-the way, and certain striking scenes will rob the aerial transfer of
-its intended “punch.”
-
-First we see the hero and his pilot just starting their flight in a
-hydro-airplane, the dark compact machine contrasting strongly with the
-magnificent spread of white sails of a large sloop yacht--perhaps thus
-tending to focus our attention on the yacht--which skims along toward
-the left of our view.
-
-Then, in the next scene, near some country village, evidently miles
-away from the expanse of water in the first picture, we see a huge
-Caproni triplane, which must have made a forced landing in the muddy
-creek of a pasture. A herd of Holstein cows with strange black and
-white markings, two bare-footed country girls, a shepherd dog, and five
-helmeted mechanicians, stand helpless, all equally admiring and dumb,
-while an alert farmer hitches an amusing span of mules, one black and
-one gray, to the triplane and drags it out of the mud.
-
-The third scene is strange indeed. It looks at first like a dazzling
-sea of foam--perhaps the ocean churned to fury by a storm--no, you
-may not believe it, but it is a sea of clouds. We are in an airplane
-of our own high in the sky, perhaps miles and miles, or maybe only
-three-quarters of a mile, above sea level. Just as we become fascinated
-by the nests of shadows among the cloud billows, a black object swings
-up from the whiteness, like a dolphin or a submarine from the sea. It
-is the hydro-airplane with our hero and his pilot; we recognize them
-because they are now sailing abreast of us only a few yards away. The
-hero stands up and is about to assume the pose of Washington crossing
-the Delaware, a difficult thing in such a strong wind when he is
-suddenly struck from behind by a villain who evidently had concealed
-himself in the body of the hydro-airplane before the flight was
-started. The villain is dressed like a soldier and seems to have a
-knapsack on his back.
-
-Meanwhile, the sea of clouds flows by, dazzling white and without a
-rift through which one might look to see whether a city, an ocean, a
-forest, or a cornfield lies below.
-
-Suddenly we look upward and discover the triplane, silhouetted sharply
-against the sky like the skeleton of some monster. It has five bodies
-and the five propellors, which three or four minutes ago were paralyzed
-in the cow pasture, now are revolving so rapidly that we cannot see
-them. It would be very interesting--but look! the villain and the hero
-are having a little wrestling match on one of the wings of their
-plane. Let us hope the hero throws the villain into the clouds! He
-does, too! But villains are deucedly clever. The knapsack turns into a
-parachute, which spreads out into a white circular form, more circular
-than any of the clouds. We wonder if there will be any one to meet him
-when he lands--but, don’t miss it! This is the “punch”! The triplane is
-flying just above the hydro-airplane. Somebody lets down a rope ladder,
-which bends back like the tail of a kite. The hero grabs it, grins at
-the camera, climbs up, and with perfect calmness asks for a cigarette,
-though he doesn’t light it, because that would be against the pilot’s
-rules.
-
-Well, the transfer from one airplane to another wasn’t so much of a
-“punch,” after all.
-
-Now let us count the thrills of such a picture as they might come to
-us from the screen. First, in order of time, would be our delight at
-the stately curves of the gleaming sails of the yacht, but this delight
-would be dulled somewhat by the physical difficulty experienced by the
-eyes in following the swaying, thrusting movement of the yacht as it
-heels from the breeze, and at the same time following the rising shape
-of the hydro-airplane; and it would be further dulled by the mental
-effort of trying to see the dramatic relation between yacht and plane.
-But, whether dulled or not, this thrill would be all in vain, for it
-surely does not put more force into the “punch” which we set out to
-produce, namely, the transfer of a man from one airplane to another.
-
-The yacht, therefore, being unnecessary to our story, violates the
-principle of unity; it violates the principles of emphasis and
-balance, because it distracts our attention from the main interest; and
-it violates the principle of rhythm, because it does not take a part in
-the upward-curving succession of interests that should culminate with
-the main “punch.”
-
-If the plane of our hero must rise from the water, and if there is to
-be a secondary interest in the picture, let it be something which,
-though really subordinate, can intensify our interest in the plane.
-Perhaps a clumsy old tug would serve the purpose, its smoke tracing a
-barrier, above which the plane soars as easily as a bird. Or perhaps a
-rowboat would be just as well, with a fisherman gazing spellbound at
-the machine that rises into the air. Either of these elements would
-emphasize the idea of height and danger.
-
-The scene of the triplane in the pasture with the cows, mules, etc.,
-might be mildly amusing. But our eyes would be taxed by its moving
-spots, and, since its tones would be dark or dark gray, the pupils
-of our eyes would become dilated, and would therefore be totally
-unprepared for the flash of white which follows in the next scene.
-
-The white expanse of fleecy clouds would shock the eyes at first sight,
-since the approach to the subject had not been properly made; but in a
-moment we would be stirred by the feeling that we were really above the
-clouds. We would seem to have passed into a new world with floods of
-mist. The long stretches of white are soft as eiderdown, yet, because
-of our own motion, they seem like the currents of a broad river, and
-one can almost imagine that it were possible to steer a canoe over
-those rapids. All this would be the second thrill, beautiful in itself
-but not actually tending to emphasize the “punch” of a man transferring
-from one airplane to another.
-
-The third thrill would surely come when the hydro-airplane swings up
-through these clouds, like a dolphin from the sea, and yet not like a
-dolphin, because it rises more slowly and in a few moments soars freely
-into the air, a marvellous happening which no words can describe.
-Yet this thrill, like the others, would exhaust our emotions rather
-than leave them fresh for the “punch” we started out to produce, the
-transfer of a man from one airplane to another.
-
-Most thrilling of all would be the moments between the instant when
-the villain is pushed off the wing of the plane and the instant when
-his parachute snaps open. The white mass of the parachute, almost like
-a tiny cloud, spreads out at the instant when it reaches the layer of
-clouds, as if they pushed it open; then the parachute sinks into the
-clouds and dies out like a wave of the sea.
-
-After all these thrills, the intended “punch” would come like a slap
-on the wrist. A man might now leap back and forth from one airplane to
-another until it was time to go home for supper, and we would only yawn
-at his exploits.
-
-Now one of the morals of this story is that we did get a “punch,” even
-though it was not the one originally intended by our imagined producer.
-Treasures often lie in unsuspected places. Nearly every common-place
-film on the screen contains some beauty by accident, some unexpected
-charm, some unforseen “punch,” something the director never dreamed
-of, which outshines the very beauty which he aimed to produce. And
-whenever a thoughtful person is stirred by such accidental beauty he is
-delighted to think that such a thing is possible. In the exceptional
-films, he knows, such effects are produced by design instead of by
-chance. It is better business, and it is better art.
-
-We said at the beginning of this chapter that it was clearly desirable
-to economize the spectator’s efforts of looking and seeing, in order
-that he may have the greatest possible amount of energy left for the
-experience of emotion. This is desirable even from a business man’s
-point of view. We shall now try to show that emotional thrills can
-actually be controlled by design, by what we shall call pictorial
-composition.
-
-But how is pictorial composition controlled, and who controls it? How
-far is the scenario writer responsible for pictorial value? How much of
-the pictorial composition shall the director direct, and how much of it
-may safely be left to other hands? And, if a picture is well composed,
-does that guarantee beauty? The answers to these questions depend upon
-our definition of terms.
-
-Composition in general means, of course, simply bringing things
-together into a mutual relation. A particular combination of parts in
-a picture may help the spectator, or may hinder him more than some
-other possible combination of the same parts. Composition is form,
-and as such should be revealing and expressive at the same time that
-it is appealing in itself. Good composition cannot easily be defined
-in a single sentence, but, for the sake of order in our discussion, I
-wish to offer the following as my working definition. The best cinema
-composition is that arrangement of elements in a scene or succession of
-scenes which enables us to see the most with the least difficulty and
-the deepest feeling.
-
-A remarkable thing about composition is that it cannot be avoided.
-Every picture must have some kind of arrangement, whether that
-arrangement be good, bad, or indifferent. As soon as an actor enters
-a room he makes a composition, because every gesture, every movement,
-every line of his body bears some pictorial relation to everything else
-within range of our vision. Even to draw a single line or to prick a
-single point upon a sheet of paper is to start a composition, because
-such a mark must bear some relation to the four unavoidable lines which
-are described by the edges of the paper.
-
-To place a flower in a vase is to make a composition. If the
-arrangement contains more meaning, more significance than the
-exhibition of the flower and the vase separately, and if this meaning
-can easily be perceived, the composition is good. A bad composition
-would doubtless result if we placed the flower and vase together in
-front of a framed photograph, because the three things would not fuse
-together into a unity which contained more meaning than the things had
-separately. In fact, even the separate values would be lost, because
-the vase would obscure the photograph, which in turn would distract our
-attention from the vase. In other words, the arrangement would not help
-us to see much with ease.
-
-On the other hand, to place the flower and vase against some hanging or
-panel which harmonizes with them in color and emphasizes the beauty of
-the flower, is good composition, providing the rest of the environment
-is in harmony. The vase must, of course, stand on something, perhaps a
-table or a mantel-piece. This support must have shape, lines, color and
-texture, all visual elements which must be skillfully wrought into our
-design if the composition is to be successful. We see, therefore, that
-the artistic arrangement of simple things which do not move, which stay
-where you put them, is by no means a simple matter.
-
-What we have just described may be called composition in a general
-sense, but it represents only the initial process in pictorial
-composition. The picture maker’s work only begins with the arranging of
-the subject. It does not end until he has recorded that subject in some
-permanent form, such as a painting, a drawing, or a celluloid negative.
-In the recording, or treatment, the painter tries to improve the
-composition of his subject. He changes the curves of the vase and the
-flower somewhat in order to obtain a more definite unity. He softens
-the emphasis in one place and heightens it in another. He balances
-shape against shape. He swings into the picture a rhythm of line and
-tone which he hopes may express to some beholder the harmony which he,
-the artist, feels. In other words, the painter begins by arranging
-things, he continues by altering the aspects of those things until they
-fit his conception of the perfect picture of the subject before him,
-and he finishes the composition only when he leaves a permanent record
-of what he has seen and felt.
-
-[Illustration: _The Shepherdess_, a painting by LeRolle, illustrating
-several principles of design which can be effectively used in
-photoplays. See page 55.]
-
-Now it is evident that the painter might begin, without an actual
-flower or vase or panel or table, by merely arranging his mental
-images of those things. But the process would, of course, still be
-composition. If, for example, he were to say to himself “To-morrow I
-shall paint a picture of a rose in a slate-blue vase standing on an
-antique oak table backed by a gray panel,” that very arrangement of
-images in his mind would be the first phase of his composition. Or if
-a customer were to come to him and say “To-morrow I want you to paint
-for me a picture of a rose,” etc., the process of bringing things
-together would still be composition; only in that case it begins with
-the customer and is completed by the painter.
-
-If we apply this reasoning to the movies it is clear that as soon as
-a scenario writer writes a single line saying that a hydro-airplane
-takes off from the sea, he has already started a pictorial composition.
-Although he may not realize it, he has already brought together the
-long straight line of the horizon, the short curving lines of the
-waves, and the short straight and oblique lines of the plane. He has
-already made it necessary to combine certain tonal values of airplane
-and sky and sea, though he may not have stopped to consider what those
-tonal values might be.
-
-But the writer does other things of greater consequence than the
-combining of shapes and tonal values. He prescribes motions and
-locomotions of things, and he orders the succession of scenes. Even if
-he writes only that “a plane rises from the sea,” he makes necessary
-the combination of a great number of movements. On the screen that
-plane will have at least four movements, namely, rising, tilting, going
-toward the right or the left, and the movement of diminishing size.
-And the sea will have at least three movements, namely, undulation,
-flowing, and the movement of the wake. Now if the scenario writer adds
-something else to the same scene, or prescribes the mutual relation of
-things and movements which are to appear in the next scene, he is, of
-course, merely continuing the process of cinema composition.
-
-Insofar as the writer makes the combination of these things essential
-to the story he circumscribes the power, he may even tie the hands, of
-the director. For the latter, unless he ignores the composition thus
-begun, can do only one thing with it; he can only carry it on.
-
-Now it is a sad thing to relate that many scenario writers do not
-suspect the truth of what we have just said. Some of them are evidently
-unaware of the significant fact that their description is really a
-prescription, that even by their written words they are really drawing
-the first lines of hundreds of pictures, that they are actually engaged
-in pictorial composition. They may be without knowledge of graphic art
-and without skill. They may not be able to take a pencil or a piece
-of charcoal and sketch out a horse or a hut or the general aspect of
-a single pictorial moment as it would appear on the screen. They may
-never have given any thought to the question of how best to arrange
-simultaneous or successive movements in order to give the strongest
-emotional appeal to the spectator. Yet they are drawing screen
-pictures, and drawing them on the typewriter!
-
-Of course, even the most intelligent scenario writers, even those who
-have the most accurate knowledge of pictorial values on the screen and
-the keenest power of visualizing their story as it will appear after
-it has been screened, are always handicapped by working in the medium
-of language. Words are not motion-photographs, any more than they are
-paint or marble. This is the scenario writer’s handicap. But, though
-we may sympathize with him because of the handicap, we cannot relieve
-him of responsibility as the designer of beginnings in the cinema
-composition.
-
-The director has a handicap, too. He also does not work in the medium
-of motion photographs. He cannot do so. Even if he were to look through
-the view-finder of the motion picture camera during the entire taking
-of every scene, he would not see exactly what we are destined to see in
-the theater. He would see things only in miniature, in a glass some two
-inches square, instead of larger than life. He would see things, not
-in black and white, but in their true colors. And he can never, under
-any circumstance, behold two or more scenes directly connected, with no
-more than the wink of an eye between them, until after the negatives
-have been developed, positives printed, and the strips spliced together
-in the cutting and joining room.
-
-In other words, neither the scenario writer nor the motion picture
-director can ever know definitely in advance just what the finished
-work will look like to us in the theater. If we are aware of these
-handicaps, it may help us to understand why ugliness so often slips
-through to the screen, but it will not permit us to tolerate that
-ugliness. We, as spectators and critics, must forever insist that the
-photoplay makers master their art, no matter how difficult the mastery
-may be.
-
-It was held some years ago that the only thing the matter with
-the movies was that the stories were badly composed and of little
-originality. Hence, a number of prominent novelists and playwrights
-were hired to adapt their own literary work or prepare new stories for
-the screen. But these literary men were among the first to discover
-that better _writing_ does not in itself guarantee better _pictures_.
-It is the director who is more truly the picture maker than any one
-of his collaborators in the work. Ideally, he should prepare his own
-scenario, just as the painter makes his own preliminary sketches, and
-the fiction writer makes his own first draught of a story. Ideally,
-too, the plot should be devised by the director (who might then truly
-be called a cinema composer), devised especially for motion pictures,
-and with peculiar qualities and appeals that could never so well be
-expressed in other mediums.
-
-But that is an ideal to be dreamed of. And, meanwhile, we “movie fans”
-can enjoy the best that is being produced by collaborative methods, and
-we can help toward the achievement of still better things by developing
-a thorough appreciation of what is pictorially pleasing, at the same
-time that we train ourselves to detect and talk out of existence the
-common faults of the movies.
-
-
-
-
-CHAPTER III
-
-EYE TESTS FOR BEAUTY
-
-
-Do the movies hurt your eyes? Some say “yes” and some say “no.” Why is
-it that photoplay scenes sometimes flash and dazzle, but have neither
-radiance nor sparkle? Why is it that the motions sometimes shown on
-the screen get “on your nerves”? Why is it that you look at so much on
-the screen and remember so little? These questions can be answered by
-making certain eye tests for beauty, and, having answered them, we may
-proceed to a detailed discussion of pictorial composition in a great
-variety of cases.
-
-In order to understand how the pleasure of pictorial beauty comes to a
-spectator, we must analyze the processes of looking and seeing. These
-processes consist partly of eye-work and partly of brain-work. That is,
-the physical eye must do certain work before the brain gets the visual
-image. Now if the physical eye has to work too hard, or bear a sudden
-strain, or undergo excessive wear, it will not function well; and,
-consequently, the brain will have to work harder in order to grasp the
-picture. All this causes displeasure, and displeasure is in conflict
-with beauty.
-
-Let us state, once for all, that motion pictures need never hurt the
-eyes--quite the contrary. Yet we have often seen photoplays that
-did hurt the eyes. Some of the reasons for this will be given in the
-following paragraphs.
-
-A familiar operation of the physical eye is the contraction and
-dilation of the pupil. We know from childhood that the pupil grows
-large when the light is weak, and small when the light is strong. We
-also know that the eye cannot make this adjustment instantly. If a
-strong light is suddenly flashed on us, for example, when we lie awake
-in a dark room it dazzles us, because our pupils are adjusted for
-darkness; it even hurts so much that we defend ourselves by closing the
-eyelids.
-
-In exactly the same way our eyes are shocked by the movies when a
-dazzling white light is flashed on the screen where a somewhat darkened
-scene has just vanished. The pupil is caught unawares, is not instantly
-able to protect the eye, and, besides, must use up a certain amount
-of energy in adapting itself to the new condition. Such a shock once
-or twice during the evening might easily be forgiven and forgotten,
-might, in fact, be hardly felt at the time; but fifty such shocks in a
-five-reel photoplay would certainly weary the eye, and a play of that
-sort could hardly be called beautiful.
-
-The fault which we have just named lies in the joining of scenes. But
-it is not, as a rule, necessary to connect scenes or sections of a film
-so that there is a jump from the darkest dark to the whitest white, or
-vice versa. This can be avoided, of course, by the device of “fading
-out” one scene and “fading in” the next, which gives the eye time to
-adapt itself, or by “fading down” or “up” just far enough to match
-the exact tone of the next picture. The shock can also be avoided by
-joining various sections of the film in a series of steps of increasing
-brightness or darkness.
-
-The eye is hurt, we have said, by a sharp succession of black and
-white. It is also hurt by a sharp contrast of whites and blacks lying
-side by side on the screen. Such extremes are avoided in paintings. The
-next time you are in an art museum please compare the brightest white
-in any portrait with the white of your cuff, or your handkerchief, or a
-piece of paper. You may be surprised to discover that the high light in
-that painting is not severely white. It is rather grayish or yellowish,
-soft and easy to the eye. Observe also that the darkest hue in that
-painting is far from the deepest possible black. The extremes of tone
-are, in fact, never very far apart, and are therefore easily grasped by
-the eye without undue strain.
-
-And while you are thinking of this practice of painters, you might
-compare it with the similar practice of composers of music. Your piano
-has many keys, the highest one in the treble being extremely far from
-the lowest one in the bass. Yet if you examine the score of any single
-piece of music you will discover that the highest note in that piece is
-not so very far from the lowest note in the same piece. It might have
-been possible to use the entire keyboard, but the composer has been
-wise enough not to try it. His extreme notes are so near together that
-the ear is able to catch them and all the subtle values of the music in
-between, without being strained by the effort.
-
-It seems, therefore, that in artistic matters moderation is a good
-thing, is, in fact, necessary to produce real beauty. But moderation
-in the movies is not yet a widely accepted gospel. Too often we find
-that the dazzling flood of rays from a strong searchlight blazes over
-several square yards of the silver screen, while at the same moment,
-on adjoining parts of the same screen hang the deep shades of night.
-The contrasts are sharp as lightning, not only in the scenes, but also
-in the sub-titles which are cut in between. Our eyes gaze and twitch
-and hurt, until it is a real relief to step out and rest them upon
-something comparatively moderate, like the electric signs on Broadway.
-
-If there were some mechanical difficulty which made this clashing
-effect of the motion pictures necessary, we could never hope for
-beauty on the screen; for no art can achieve beauty by producing pain.
-But we know from the work of such directors as James Cruze, D. W.
-Griffith, Allan Dwan, Rex Ingram, and John Robertson, that the moving
-picture camera is capable of recording light gray and dark gray, as
-well as steel white and ebony. They have shown us that it is possible
-to produce sub-titles with light gray lettering against a dark gray
-ground, and that such a combination of tones is pleasing to the eye.
-They have shown us that it is possible to screen a lady of the fairest
-face and dressed in the snowiest gown so as to bring out the softest
-tones of light and shade, yet show nothing as dazzling as snow and
-nothing as black as ebony.
-
-[Illustration: From _The Spell of the Yukon_. An interesting example of
-_chiaroscuro_ and the harmonizing of dramatic pantomime with pictorial
-pattern. The composition, however, is slightly marred by over-emphasis
-on the window. See pages 55 and 63.]
-
-[Illustration: A study of the “still” shown above, illustrating a
-simple method of analyzing pictorial composition. See page 63.]
-
-Some of the “stills” in this book give a hint of the sharp contrasts in
-the inferior films, but it is only a hint, because the white portions
-in those illustrations can be no whiter than the paper of the page,
-which is dull in comparison with the blaze on the screen. The
-movie theater is the best place to verify the theories which we are
-here trying to explain in words. Go to the movies. Whenever you find
-that you enjoy the films thoroughly, then by all means do not stop to
-analyze or criticise. If you enjoy any particular film so much that you
-are sure you would like to see it two or three times every year for
-the rest of your life, you may be happy, for you have discovered one
-of the classics of the screen. Do not analyze that film either, unless
-you are in the business of making pictures. But if a film makes you
-uncomfortable, or if it is so bad that you are quite disgusted with it,
-then, though you must become a martyr to do it, please stay and see it
-again. Compare the good parts of the film, if there are any, with the
-bad parts; study it in detail until you see where the trouble lies.
-And when you have discovered the real causes of ugliness in that film,
-wouldn’t it be a public service to express your opinion in such a way
-that the manager of your theater might hear it?
-
-Thus far in this chapter we have discussed only a single operation of
-the eye, namely, the expanding and contracting of the pupils under the
-effect of darkness and brightness, but it is easy to understand now how
-such an apparently slight thing may seriously affect our enjoyment of
-the movies. Let the reader, when he is next displeased by a picture,
-test it for sharpness of contrast between white and black. He will
-probably not have to seek further for explanation of its ugliness.
-
-Another operation which the eye-machine performs is the accommodation
-to color. It is somewhat similar to the accommodation to distance,
-which we shall describe, if the reader will help us by making an
-experiment. Close one eye and look steadily with the other at an
-object across the room. Now, without changing your gaze, hold up your
-finger in line with this object and about a foot away from your eye.
-The outline of the finger will be indistinct as long as you keep the
-eye focused on the remote object. Now, still keeping one eye shut,
-look at your finger until you can see the little ridges on it. The eye
-has changed its focus, and the remote object is now indistinct. What
-happens is that the lens within the eye changes its shape, bulging more
-for near objects and flattening again for distant objects. This work of
-the eye, called accommodation, is done by certain delicate muscles. A
-little of it may be stimulating, but too much will make the eyes tired.
-
-Now it is a strange thing that certain colors affect the eyes in the
-same way as distances. Painters knew this fact for hundreds of years
-before the scientists were able to explain the reason. They knew that
-blue seemed farther away than red, and arranged the colors in their
-paintings accordingly. All artists have learned the trick, even some of
-our commercial artists, who make advertising posters for street cars.
-Blue makes the background fall back; red makes a figure stand forward.
-The reason for this illusion is that when the eye looks at red it
-adjusts itself exactly as if it were looking at a near object, and thus
-deceives the brain, so to speak; and when it looks at blue it adjusts
-itself as if it were looking at a distant object and again deceives the
-brain. Or, to state the fact more completely, a color from the red end
-of the color scale (red, orange, yellow, green, blue, indigo, violet)
-seems nearer to the eye than one from the violet end, even though the
-colors are all placed equally distant from the eye.
-
-Now we shall see that, although these effects of color are useful in
-a painting, they may be harmful in a motion picture. When we behold
-a painting in which colors ranging from red to yellow are contrasted
-with colors ranging from violet to blue, we may, indeed, get a pleasant
-sensation of the eye because of the stimulating activity in the work
-of accommodation. There is to most people a distinct pleasure, for
-example, in shifting the gaze from orange-yellow to blue, because those
-colors are felt to be “complementary.” But it must be remembered that
-the circumstances of looking at a painting are entirely different from
-those of looking at a motion picture.
-
-Two differences are especially notable. The first difference is that
-when we look at a painting we ourselves are practically the choosers of
-when and how long to look at any spot, line, shape, or color. In other
-words, we ourselves practically decide on how much and what kind of
-work our eyes shall do; but when we look at a motion picture we never
-know at any instant what we may be called upon to do the next instant.
-That makes us nervous. We need to be constantly braced for the shock
-and, if we are not so braced, we must suffer when the shock comes.
-
-The second difference is that everything in a painting is always
-actually at rest, while nearly everything in a motion picture is always
-in motion. If a painting, which does not move in any of its parts,
-can suggest movement to our imagination, or can make our eyes perform
-actual movements of vision, such movements, actual and imaginary, are
-pleasantly stimulating. The eyes enjoy the natural activity of their
-work, and we feel that there is life in the painting. But the motion
-picture, by its very nature, has as much life as it needs. It naturally
-gives the eyes all the work they can stand. Hence, if they need any
-stimulating change at all, it is rather the change from movement to
-repose.
-
-Now let us go to the movie theater. Very likely before the show is over
-we shall be treated to a rapid shifting from the blue of some exterior
-scene in the moonlight to the orange-yellowish glow of some interior
-scene in lamplight. Our eyes, therefore, must accommodate their lenses
-to one of these colors again and again, only to receive a sudden demand
-for accommodation to the other color. We have no choice in the matter
-except to get up and go out. Our eyes, already busy enough, do not need
-the stimulation of any more activity, and our minds, already active
-enough, would prefer the relief of something more reposeful.
-
-If the director must have this shifting from blue to orange to blue,
-etc., he might, at least, give us some warning, some softening of the
-shock, so to speak. For example, if there is to be a sudden shift from
-a yellowish lamp-light scene to a bluish night scene, a hint might be
-given by attracting our attention to a window, through which the blue
-of night is shown. And similarly in a bluish night scene our attention
-might be attracted toward the warm glow from a door or window as a
-warning that the next scene is to be flooded with that color. Thus in
-either case we would have a chance to prepare our eyes for the shift,
-and we would sense a better continuity of movement.
-
-The subject of color in the movies will be discussed again in following
-chapters. It may be remarked in passing that, since color movies are
-still highly experimental, it is only to be expected that mistakes of
-many kinds will be made. Doubtless the leading directors can be trusted
-to learn from experience. Yet it behooves us who sit in the theaters to
-be as disapproving of new faults as we are exultant over new beauties.
-
-It is not discouraging to discover a fault, so long as we see that it
-is one which might have been avoided. We want to make it plain in this
-chapter that, although the movies sometimes hurt the eyes, it is never
-due to any necessity. It is a fact that pictures on the screen, when
-properly made, are always pleasing to the spectators’ eyes. And he who
-does not accept this as a fundamental proposition can hardly come by
-any large faith in the future of the photoplay as art.
-
-But we must make a few more eye tests for beauty. If you face a wall
-about twenty feet away, you can, without changing the position of your
-head, look at the left side or the right, at the top or bottom, or you
-can look at the four corners of the wall in succession. These three
-different kinds of movements, vertical, horizontal, circular, are
-controlled by as many different sets of muscles.
-
-When we look at pictures, especially large pictures, these muscles are
-constantly busy directing our line of regard from one point of interest
-to another; and, whether there are definite points of interest or not,
-our eyes will range over the lines and shapes as we try to discover
-what they are meant to represent.
-
-Now a certain amount of eye-movement does not hurt the muscles; it is,
-on the contrary, rather pleasant, because their business is to attend
-to those matters. But the eye will become fatigued by a great amount of
-movement, especially when it is forced upon us at unexpected moments,
-just as any other part of the body will become fatigued when it is
-forced to perform a great number of sudden, unexpected tasks.
-
-A simple experiment will illustrate this further. Suppose that we are
-sitting in our door-yard, gazing across a valley at a group of trees
-a mile or so away. It is more restful to look at those distant trees
-than at a single tree only fifty feet away; and the reason is simple.
-When we look at any object our eyes have a tendency to follow its
-outline. Now, of course, it requires more rolling of the eyes to follow
-the outline of a tree near by than one in the distance. This rolling
-movement involves muscular work. And, if we look first at the near,
-large object and then shift to the distant, small ones, we immediately
-experience the restfulness of reduced work. There are other reasons why
-distant objects are restful to the eyes, but they do not concern us
-here.
-
-Have you ever noticed the pleasing effect in the motion pictures when
-the thing of interest, say, a train or a band of horsemen disappearing
-in the distance, narrows itself down to a small space? All images on
-the screen are, of course, equally distant from the spectator; yet
-there is a sense of restfulness, as we have just explained, because the
-rolling of the eyes decreases with the diminishing of the image and its
-area of movement on the screen.
-
-But suddenly there comes a close-up of a face twenty feet in diameter,
-and our eyes have to get busy in the effort to cover the whole field at
-once. They rove quickly over several square yards of screen until that
-face is completely surveyed and every detail noted. Lots of looking!
-Yes, but that “star” gets fifty thousand dollars a month! Can’t fool
-the camera though--crow’s-feet on both sides--fourteen diamonds in the
-left ear-drop and----
-
-Flash to a broad, quiet, soft gray landscape, with a lone rider on
-the horizon--oh, pshaw!--diamonds must ’a’ been glass though--anyway,
-this picture’s good for sore eyes--kind o’ easy feelin’--Indian scout
-maybe--or a----
-
-Flash to a close-up of a Mexican bandit, etc., etc. And our eyes get
-busy again mapping out the whole subject from hat to hoof, from bridle
-to tail. Exciting! Oh, yes, indeed, and interesting too, but not as
-art; for those little muscles up there are jerked around too much, they
-are working overtime, and soon get weary.
-
-“Oh, well, I reckon I can stand the strain,” says some heckler, who
-“don’t quite, you know, get this high-brow stuff.” Of course, he can
-stand it. We have stood the mad orchestra of the elevated trains, and
-the riveters, and the neighbor’s parrot for years, but we do not call
-it music.
-
-The difference between noise and harmony is a physical difference.
-If this were not true, no one could ever tune your piano. Jarring,
-clashing, discordant sounds displease the ear. Just why noise
-displeases is not for us to say. But we have already explained three
-reasons why bad motion pictures hurt the eyes. Let us remember them.
-First, sudden shifts from dark to bright pictures shock the eye.
-Second, sudden shifts from a picture in a “cool” tint to another in
-a “warm” tint, and vice versa, over-work the eye. Third, a series of
-quick close-ups or other pictures in which the frame is filled with the
-subject demands too much eye-movement.
-
-In the case of the close-up, or any large picture where the points of
-interest are scattered all over the field of vision, the eyes, as we
-have said, become strained by too much rolling, a muscular effort which
-is necessary even though the separate points of interest may themselves
-be fixed, as fixed as the four corners of the screen itself.
-
-But when the points of interest are moving things, as they generally
-are in the movies, new causes of strain often arise. Sometimes the
-object we are trying to look at moves so fast that we can hardly follow
-it. Quick movement is generally desired by the directors because they
-think that briskness, or “pep,” makes the dramatic action more intense.
-Consequently people in the movies walk, march, dance, fight, and carry
-on with terrific speed until our eyes become tired in the attempt to
-observe all that is happening. The cure for such pictorial hysterics
-is simple moderation, the elimination of jerky movements wherever
-possible, and the choice of movements so easy to follow that the eye
-may perceive them with the least muscular effort.
-
-We do not say that you who worship speed shall not have your express
-trains, your racing cars, your airplanes, your cow-ponies, and
-your Arabian steeds. You may have them all, because they can be so
-photographed that an actual run of two or three miles may be presented
-on the screen as a movement of only two or three feet.
-
-We find, too, that there is something pleasing about the apparent
-slowness of actions that are moderated by distance. On the far horizon,
-therefore, the fleetest things seem retarded to a stately pace that
-claims our restful gaze. But when a quick movement takes place in the
-foreground of the picture, too near the camera, ugliness results,
-because the demands on the eye-muscles are too severe and unexpected.
-Thus a sudden gesture, or the waving branches of trees or bushes, or a
-motor car driving up in front of a house, or even such intended grace
-as the movement in dancing, may spoil a picture by being too near the
-camera.
-
-Another thing which makes close-up movements ugly is the flicker, which
-cannot be entirely eliminated. Our readers are doubtless generally
-aware that what we see on the screen is simply the blending of a
-rapid succession of still pictures falling on different spots in an
-order and a direction which gives the appearance of motion. If you
-examine a film you will find that there are in fact sixteen little
-photographs, or “frames” to every foot of ribbon. The negative runs
-through the camera, and the positive film through the projecting
-machine, at a rate of about a foot per second. Now let us suppose that
-we have a screen sixteen feet long and that we throw upon it a picture
-of a car running at the rate of ten or eleven miles per hour. If the
-picture is a close view the image will move across our screen in just
-one second of time, for the speed we have assumed is at the rate of
-sixteen feet per second. But, since there are only sixteen frames in
-that foot, or second, of film, we know that only sixteen flashes of
-the car have been thrown on the screen during that second. Therefore,
-whatever particular part of the car we are looking at has fallen on
-sixteen different spots of the screen, and each spot is just one foot
-to the side of the previous one, because the screen is by assumption
-just sixteen feet wide. Now these separations are so wide that the
-eye cannot help noticing them even in the fraction of a second; there
-is not sufficient blending of images to form smooth motion; and the
-so-called flicker results.
-
-However, if the car is photographed going obliquely away from us, the
-entire motion may occupy only a small area of the screen, no matter
-how far or fast the car goes; consequently the images fall much closer
-together and the flicker becomes so slight that we scarcely notice it.
-Also, since the field of movement is smaller in extent, the rolling of
-our eyes in ranging over the subject is less, and the fatigue of the
-muscles is so slight that we scarcely notice that either.
-
-We have been arguing that large violent movements on the screen hurt
-the eyes, and we hope that our readers agree with us. But if any one
-is doubtful we invite him to make the following test. Go to any movie
-theater and sit down in the seventh or eighth row. Then after having
-seen about half of the picture, move back to the last row, or stand
-behind the last row. The picture will immediately seem more restful to
-the eyes, because the distance has made the screen seem smaller and the
-motions slower, two changes which, of course, make less work for the
-eyes. Now stay in the new position until the program is finished, and
-then see that part of the picture which was at first seen from the
-front seat. It will appear much more pleasing to the eye than it did
-the first time.
-
-[Illustration: _Daylight and Lamplight_, a painting by William
-McGregor. The design illustrates artistic balance and rhythm. See pages
-41 and 77.]
-
-[Illustration: A study of lines to illustrate the value of repetition
-within a pattern. See page 40.]
-
-But we cannot all sit in the back row of a theater, and besides, even
-when screen motions are reasonably slow and limited, they may still
-fail to produce the effect of beauty.
-
-Now, before we go further into this discussion of beauty on the screen,
-let us recall, that, as we have already said, the process of vision is
-partly eye-work and partly brain-work. These two factors are so closely
-connected in fact, that scientists cannot definitely separate them.[B]
-
- [B] If any of our readers are especially interested in the
- details of physiological and psychological experiments
- in vision which are made by experts, they should read
- Chapter III in Hugo Muensterberg’s “The Photoplay,” and
- should consult the current numbers and the volumes for
- the last five or six years of the “Psychological Review,”
- the “American Journal of Psychology,” the “Journal of
- Experimental Psychology,” and other similar periodicals,
- which are available in any large library.
-
-From the results published in scientific periodicals it may be learned
-that visible ugliness does not always make the physical work of the eye
-more difficult. This is not to contradict what we have already said in
-this chapter, but merely to state that there may be certain kinds of
-ugliness on the screen which apparently do not hurt the eye at all.
-And yet ugliness does affect the mental phase of vision. It will be
-worth while giving a page or more to the testing of this statement; and
-the discussion may lead to a useful definition to keep in mind when
-criticizing the movies.
-
-Curiously enough, the muscular movement of the eye when ranging over a
-single jagged, irregular line is practically the same as when ranging
-over a graceful line of similar length and direction. Scientific
-experiment shows that we move our eye-balls in a jerky, irregular
-manner, even when we view the most graceful line that can be drawn. Yet
-it is commonly said by all of us that one line delights the eye and the
-other does not. Evidently, therefore, the difference must lie in that
-function of seeing which the brain performs. But the brain, too, is
-a physical organ. It, too, can become fatigued, and it finds certain
-kinds of work less fatiguing than others.
-
-Psychologists have suggested that a graceful line is pleasant to look
-at because the regularity and smoothness of its changes in direction
-make it easily perceived as a complete unity. Thus in the diagram
-facing page 39, lines A and B are pleasanter to look at than lines C
-and D, because their character as lines can be grasped by the mind more
-quickly and more easily than the character of C or D. And, for the same
-reason, lines A and B taken together make a more pleasing combination
-than lines B and C or lines C and D.
-
-Now, if you will shut the book and try to draw any one of these four
-lines, even in your imagination, you will discover that you remember A
-and B almost perfectly, while you can hardly remember a single part of
-either C or D. This proves that in your own case the business of seeing
-has been more successful with graceful lines than with ugly ones. And,
-of course, successful effort is always more pleasing than failure.
-
-Our working definition of good pictorial composition, offered in the
-preceding chapter, may be adapted here. Let us put it this way: A
-beautiful line or combination of lines is one in which we can see and
-feel much with ease, while an ugly line or combination is one in which
-we cannot see or feel much except with great difficulty. The terms
-“ease” and “difficulty” apply both to eye-work and brain-work.
-
-One reason why we see _much with ease_ in a beautiful line is evidently
-that any one part of the whole is a kind of key to some adjoining or
-corresponding part. Thus in line A the lower curve is very similar to
-the upper curve and leads into it with the smoothest continuity. And
-this same lower curve of A is so similar to the lower curve of B that
-we can see instantly the balanced relation between them. In ugly lines,
-on the other hand, there are no such visual helps. Yet, if some kind of
-balance or repetition is adopted, it may be that lines which are ugly
-when considered singly take on a kind of beauty or interestingness when
-considered as a group. Thus lines E, F, and G, are not as pleasing when
-standing alone as they become when considered in relation to a similar
-line symmetrically placed. Therefore, the combinations EF or FG, or
-even EFG are more pleasing than any one of their parts.
-
-Now let us apply these principles of continuity and repetition to the
-lines in a picture. If you turn to Paxton’s “Daylight and Lamplight,”
-facing page 39, you will observe instantly the beautifully curving line
-of the woman’s back and also a balancing line down the side of the
-urn. That sweep of line gives at once the key to the arrangement of
-the picture.[C] In other words, you can see much of that picture with
-ease, even in a glance. Now if you examine this picture more in detail
-you will find much continuity of line and many parallelisms of line
-and shape, all of which tend to make the arrangement simple, without
-reducing any of the actual contents of the picture.
-
- [C] Out of fairness to the painter it must be added that this
- canvas, as the title indicates, is also a study in the
- balancing of cool and warm colors.
-
-The “much” which we can see in a beautiful line includes such things
-as its meaning or use in the picture, its fitness for that use, its
-power to suggest associations, its interestingness, etc. But we shall
-not take up those phases of beauty in this chapter; we are now merely
-arguing that pictorial beauty economizes the work of the eye and brain,
-while visible ugliness does not.
-
-What we said, a moment ago, regarding the value of continuity and
-repetition in fixed lines may also be applied to moving lines and
-objects. The great appeal of the screen lies in the showing of vivid
-movement, the flow of forms, the subtle weaving, through soft play of
-light and shadow, of fanciful figures that melt like music while we
-gaze, and yet remain in our minds like curves of a strange melody. When
-such glimpses of beauty come, our eyes and brains surely do not feel
-any friction or strain in the process of looking. But when ugly motions
-are presented the eye must perform excessive movement, and the brain
-must exert excessive effort.
-
-What is an ugly motion? To answer this we must observe one or two facts
-concerning the visual process of seeing motions. We must admit the
-fact that one can perceive the motion of an object without following
-it with the eyes. Any one can test this for himself by fixing his eyes
-steadily on some spot on the wall. Without shifting his glance he may
-have knowledge of motions going on at other places many feet away
-from that spot. But it is also a fact that he will immediately feel an
-inclination to shift his eyes in order to see any one of these motions
-more clearly. In making that shift he will, of course, have to move his
-eyeballs. Now, if that moving object changes its place, his eyeballs
-will continue to make the movements necessary to follow it. And, if the
-attention continues directed toward that object, his eyes will have to
-make great or small movements, according as the object makes a great or
-small change of place.
-
-An interesting theory, which scientific tests support, is that,
-although the eye has to make a series of irregular, jerky movements
-when following any moving object, these movements become fewer and
-smaller as the smoothness and regularity of the observed motion
-increases.
-
-What we have just said about eye movement explains, at least
-partly, why the aimless crawling of a house fly over a window pane
-is ugly, while the graceful flying of a sea gull is beautiful; why
-the clambering of a monkey is ugly, while the swimming of a fish is
-graceful, and why the zigzag falling of a sheet of paper thrown from a
-window is displeasing, while the smooth spiralling of an airplane is
-pleasing.
-
-In some of the movements which we classify as beautiful, it is clear
-that the principle of repetition is at work, which, as we have said,
-makes seeing easy. Any task accomplished once and undertaken again
-becomes easier and easier with repetition. We have already shown
-how this makes the perception of rhythmical fixed lines or balanced
-composition of fixed lines easier for the mind, if not for the eye
-itself. A similar experience of ease comes from viewing rhythmical or
-balanced motions.
-
-You would not enjoy watching a dancer whose every movement was entirely
-unlike every previous movement. The effect would be utter confusion.
-You could not grasp, could not remember, what you saw. And you would
-probably say that it was not dancing at all. On the contrary, the
-beauty of a dance is largely due to the frequent repetitions or
-similarities of movements. Again and again you see and enjoy the same
-flexing of knee and poising of foot, the same curving of back and
-tossing of head, the same sweeping of hand and floating of drapery;
-and again and again the dancer moves through the same path of circling
-lines. Yet in these repetitions there are slight variations, too,
-because no human being works with the precision of a machine. And as
-you watch the dance you get variety without multiplicity; you see much
-with ease.
-
-“Now, look here,” cuts in some old-time producer, “you don’t mean to
-say that you want our actors to dance through a drama, do you--a murder
-scene, or a wedding, or a meeting of profiteers to raise the price of
-soap?” No, indeed, we do not. In fact, we are hardly thinking of them
-as actors at all--not in this chapter. We are merely thinking of them
-as moving shapes upon a screen. And we want those shapes to move about
-in such a way that the motions will not hurt our eyes.
-
-If we study those films that please us most we shall discover easy
-continuity of movement, so that a path of motion described in any one
-scene is extended, as it were, into a similar path of motion in the
-following scene. In such motion pictures there may be shifts, but
-there are no breaks. Paths of motion on the screen can remain long in
-our memories, as though they were fixed lines in a picture. Clearly,
-therefore, it would not be pleasing to have these remembered lines of
-motion clashing with those which are being perceived.
-
-[Illustration: From _Audrey_. Cover up the left half of this picture
-and the lower half of the remaining part, and the quarter which then
-remains will contain a more pleasing and dramatic composition than that
-of the view taken as a whole. See pages 53 and 71.]
-
-So much for the optical effects of single motions coming in succession.
-Now we must advance to the consideration of several motions going on
-in various directions during the same moment, which is a more usual
-situation in the photoplay. Several motions at once may constitute a
-harmony or a jumble, according to the first demands which they make
-upon the eye-work and brain-work of vision.
-
-The difference between visual harmony and disharmony seems to depend
-partly on the fact that a pair of human eyes work together as one,
-and not as two separate instruments. You cannot look up with one eye
-and down with the other; you cannot look to the left with one eye
-and to the right with the other; you cannot look at a distant object
-with one eye and at a near one with the other. Hence, if you try to
-look intently at two or more objects crossing each other in opposite
-directions, your eyes are baffled and the effect is not pleasurable.
-There is also a conflict in our mental work of seeing, when opposing
-motions try to claim equal attention at the same time, unless, as we
-have previously stated, these motions are in some kind of rhythmical
-balance with each other.
-
-Because of this baffling of eye and brain, therefore, we are displeased
-by the sight of two automobiles passing each other in opposite
-directions, or by the crossing of an actor’s gestures with the spoke
-of a wheel or the twig of a tree. A particularly ugly crossing is that
-of false and real motion, which even some of the best directors still
-indulge in. False, or apparent, motion occurs when the camera itself
-has been moving about while the picture was being taken. Thus a road is
-made to shoot upwards over the screen while our hero is riding madly
-toward us, or a parlor slides drunkenly to one side while some fair
-lady marches toward a door, or a stairway becomes a waterfall which
-she swims upstairs. The real motion, of course, contains the dramatic
-interest, but the false motion forces itself upon us by its novelty or
-unexpectedness; it becomes difficult for us to see much with ease, and
-the result is ugliness.
-
-A particularly annoying device of recent vogue is the sub-title insert
-which is decorated with symbolical motions. It forces the spectator
-to read words and look at motions at the same time and upon the same
-spot of the screen. The Metro interpretation of the “Four Horsemen of
-the Apocalypse,” beautiful in its photographed scenes, was spoiled by
-much ugliness of that kind. In one sub-title we must look at the Beast
-snorting and chopping his long jaws, while several lines of type are
-spread over his horrible movements. In others we see water flowing
-from the bottom of the screen toward the top, or we see a pin-wheel of
-sparks, to represent telegraphic messages going around the world, or we
-see a squirrel in his wheel-cage, to represent something or other, and
-in each of these cases we must also read words in glaring type blazed
-on top of the moving symbols.
-
-Oppositions and conflicts baffle and bewilder the eye and mind, but
-concurrent co-operating motions please them. It is easy, for example,
-to look at the shower of fire from a sky rocket, because the lines move
-in similar directions and remain comparatively near together, each one,
-as it were, helping the others, so that what we see in one part of the
-motion is a key to the rest of the motion. There is a similar unity and
-rhythmical balance in the motion of a flock of birds, a school of fish,
-or a group of dancers, the billows of the sea, or the feathery fall of
-snowflakes.
-
-The production of harmonious motions in a photoplay might seem to us
-spectators to be merely a matter of spying with a camera and catching
-views of harmonious actions and settings. But the problem is not so
-simple. For the movements within any given scene may be perfectly
-orchestrated with respect to each other, and yet may clash with every
-one of the movements in the following scene. If in one picture our
-eyes and minds have adjusted themselves to the delicate threading of
-snow-flakes, falling like a softly changing tapestry, they can only be
-shocked by a sudden jump to the vigorous curling of a sea wave breaking
-on the beach. And in our natural desire to appreciate both subjects
-at once we are disappointed to find that each has spoiled the other.
-Delicacy looks at power and thinks it violence; power looks at delicacy
-and thinks it weakness. It is a visual effect such as one would get
-from a drawing where the hair lines of the finest pen and thinnest ink
-were crossed by the coarse marks of a blunt piece of charcoal.
-
-So sharp a contrast might have a certain dramatic, stirring effect,
-like the use of swear words in a prayer; the very hurt might bring
-a certain thrill. An original and ingenious man, Mr. Griffith, for
-instance, may choose to show us a close-up of a little girl smiling
-in wistful innocence, her pretty curls quivering in the light breeze,
-contrasted suddenly with a reeking flood of soldiers pouring into a
-city street. Striking? Yes, exactly. The device is so striking that Mr.
-Griffith himself has learned to use it with restraint. Because once
-upon a time he composed a photoplay called “Intolerance,” which was
-so full of striking contrasts that it failed. There were only a few
-thousand people in the world who could stand the strain of looking at
-it.
-
-Thus as we analyze the optical aspects of a motion picture we are
-amazed at the number of things that may conspire to hurt our eyes, and
-we sympathize more than ever with the sincere cinema composer. He,
-the new hope of the movies, feels the need of other equipment than a
-line of talk and a megaphone. He no longer applies for a position in a
-studio on the strength of his record as an actor, as a stage director,
-as a city editor, as a college cheer leader, or as a drill sergeant in
-the army. He has begun to think in pictorial composition and not in
-words. He is never without his sketching pad and piece of charcoal,
-because, forsooth, his business is picture making. He makes hundreds of
-sketches by day, of shapes, and lines, and tones, and he goes over them
-again and changes them by night. His scenario contains almost as many
-drawings as words. He knows before he says “Good morning” to his queens
-and cut-throats just what places and spaces their figures will occupy
-during the pictorial climaxes, as well as during the movements to, and
-away from, those climaxes. He sits among miles of films which he cuts,
-joins, runs through his projecting machine, and cuts and joins again.
-He knows that pictorial beauty does not come to the screen merely
-because the camera itself is a wonderful instrument. He knows, what so
-many critics are beginning to discover, that “the photography” may be
-excellent in a film, while its pictorial composition is atrocious. He
-knows first and last and always that, unless he makes his photoplay
-fundamentally pleasing to the eyes of the spectator, he can never give
-it the magic power of graphic art.
-
-
-
-
-CHAPTER IV
-
-PICTORIAL FORCE IN FIXED PATTERNS
-
-
-Frequently while a director is rehearsing a photoplay scene he will
-sing out the command, “Hold it!” indicating thereby that the player
-has struck an attitude, or the players have woven themselves into a
-pattern, which is so expressive and beautiful that it deserves to be
-held for several seconds. What the camera then records will be shown on
-the screen as a striking pictorial moment, and, while it lasts, will
-appear as fixed as a painting.
-
-But it is a peculiar psychological fact that such pictorial moments
-seem to occur in every movement, whether the actors have paused or not,
-the spectator seeing and remembering these arrested moments as though
-they were fixed pictures. This peculiar fact, that we remember fixed
-moments among continuous movements, has been discussed at some length
-in Chapter III of “The Art of Photoplay Making,” and will, therefore,
-not be dwelt upon here. However, a single example may illustrate what
-we mean. Suppose we watch a diver stepping out upon a high springboard
-and diving into a pool. The whole feat is, of course, a movement
-without pause from beginning to end; yet our eyes will somehow arrest
-one moment as the most interesting, the most pictorial. It may be the
-moment when the diver is about midway between the springboard and the
-water, a moment when the body seems to float strangely upon the air. We
-are not unaware of the other phases of the dive, yet this particular
-moment impresses us; to it we apply our fine appraisal of form.
-
-Similarly in a motion picture theater we unconsciously select moments
-from the action before us. These fleeting moments which fix themselves,
-so to speak, demand practically the same work (or shall we call it
-play?) from our eyes and minds as the momentarily fixed pictures which
-the director sometimes demands. At such times the whole pattern on the
-screen becomes as static as a painting, and its power or weakness,
-its beauty or lack of beauty, may be appreciated much as one would
-appreciate a design in a painting.
-
-A painting enchants the beholder, not only by its color, but also
-by its lines and pattern. The peculiar power which resides in the
-arrangement of lines and masses has been studied by art critics
-for hundreds of years, and many of the principles which they have
-discovered might well be recalled by us in judging those moments of
-a motion picture which may be viewed as fixed designs. And what we
-learn by making such applications will help us greatly toward a better
-understanding of the beauty of pictorial motions on the screen.
-
-By what visual processes do we grasp the meaning of a picture? What
-happens when we first look at the picture? And what happens as we
-continue looking? The answers, as nearly as can be ascertained, are
-as follows. When we face a picture our eyes first glance at some spot
-or region which is more attractive than all others, and then proceed
-to explore the whole picture, ranging over all of its parts, and
-returning again to the center of attraction. In certain compositions
-this whole tour of inspection may be accomplished in one trip, and may
-be repeated at will, while in other compositions the inspection may
-require various side trips away from the center of interest to the
-outlying districts and back again. Of course, we are not aware that our
-eyes are doing all these things when we are at the movies, but that is
-what happens, just the same.
-
-These visual processes take place in an exceedingly short time, usually
-only a fraction of a second, but they are real physical processes,
-nevertheless, subject to the laws of physical comfort and fatigue, and
-capable of being tested by the ordinary laws of physical efficiency.
-
-Perhaps the first test, in this hectic age of ours, is speed. The
-quicker we can see and interpret a thing after we begin looking at
-it, the more satisfied we are. Another test is ease, or freedom from
-fatigue. The less energy we expend in looking, the more pleased we are.
-Hence, if the several parts of a picture can be quickly and easily seen
-and related to each other, the picture as a whole may be considered
-beautiful, providing it satisfies certain other demands, which will be
-analyzed later on.
-
-Now suppose that we are at the movies and that some pictorial moment
-from the flowing action is arrested in our minds. If we are critical
-and feel like analyzing the effect of that arrested moment we may well
-ask such questions as the following:
-
-What portion of that picture did we look at first, and why? Was that
-the spot which the cinema composer desired us to see first? If not,
-how did he happen to mislead us and waste our time?
-
-Where did our glances wander as we continued looking at the picture?
-Did they follow the lines which the cinema composer had mapped out? If
-not, what is wrong with his plan?
-
-What part of the picture remains longest in memory? Does it coincide
-with the dramatic emphasis intended by the composer? If not, what
-caused the wrong accent?
-
-Was the picture as a whole really beautiful to the eyes? If not, what
-made it displeasing?
-
-Beginning with the first question, we may say that the attracting
-power of any portion of a picture depends upon many circumstances and
-conditions. For example, a patch of white on an area of dark will
-attract the eye, because it is natural for the eye to seek light in
-preference to dark. Hence, in the “still” from “Audrey” on page 45 we
-see the woman first; then we see the tree trunks, the reflections in
-the water, and the person half hidden in the bushes to the left. It
-is also natural for the eye to catch and follow the longest line in a
-composition. Therefore the trunk of the fallen tree in this picture
-helps to lead the eye to the woman. It is, furthermore, natural for the
-eye to follow two or more lines to a point where they meet. Therefore
-this picture would have given more emphasis to the woman if she had
-been placed near the root of the tree trunk, where many lines converge.
-
-The spectator in the theater should be enabled to see the central
-interest at the very first instant of projection. Hence when the
-picture is being taken, all lines of indication, gesture, draperies,
-etc., should be set, before the camera begins “shooting,” and these
-lines should connect up with the paths of previously moving objects, so
-that the spectator’s eyes may sweep at once to the central interest.
-
-The need of this may be illustrated by a horrible example. Let us turn
-to the “still” on page 55. It is a safe bet that every one who looks at
-this picture will first see a long diagonal pole, one of the supports
-of the swing, because that is the longest, most striking line of the
-picture. The poles leaning together and the converging chains, though
-of no dramatic importance whatsoever, attract immediate attention to
-themselves, and also carry the eye to the two standing girls; which is
-clearly a mistake in composition, for the real interest evidently lies
-in the facial expressions of the man and woman, who are conversing with
-each other.
-
-Students of pictorial design have discovered that, of all converging
-lines in a drawing, those which meet at right angles usually attract
-the eyes most strongly. Now if we look again at the “still” under
-discussion we will observe that there are many square corners in its
-composition, but that none of these angles coincide with any interest
-deserving of pictorial emphasis. Two of the strongest accents are at
-the square corners where the long pole and the brick curbing meet. Yet
-there is certainly no very exciting interest in that region. Hence our
-eyes wander thither in vain.
-
-Let us speculate for a moment on what would happen to this composition
-if we remove the diagonal poles, chains, etc., and turn the swing into
-a seat. The figures, even as they stand, would then form a not
-unpleasing rhythm, and the line of heads, with expressions helping to
-give direction, would lead to the heroine.
-
-[Illustration: This “still” illustrates misplaced emphasis and several
-other defects in pictorial composition which characterized the general
-run of movies a few years ago. See page 54.]
-
-[Illustration: A specimen of bad composition, from an old film. The
-window is emphasized by its curious shape, by its central position, by
-its strong contrasts of black and white, and by the woman’s gesture;
-yet this window has no dramatic significance whatsoever in the scene.
-See page 55.]
-
-A glaring example of wrong emphasis caused by the attraction of a
-right-angled shape is to be seen in a “still” from “Other Men’s
-Wives,” on opposite page, where the window, toward which the woman
-unconsciously points her wand, irresistibly attracts the attention of
-the spectator. Is it not evident from even a cursory analysis of these
-“stills” that, though the directors may have given some thought to the
-poses and groupings of the performers, they have failed to realize
-that every other visible thing within scope of the camera must also
-be harmonized with the figures in order to keep the dramatic emphasis
-where it belongs?
-
-Keeping in mind what we have just said about the visual accents of
-right angles we turn to a “still” from the “Spell of the Yukon,” facing
-page 28. The window catches our eyes before anything else in the
-picture, both because of its square corners and because of its sharp
-contrasts of black and white. Though this distraction may be only for a
-brief moment, it is enough to keep our attention for that moment away
-from the man and boy, set in fine atmosphere.
-
-It is only common sense to aim at making the visual interest of a
-picture coincide with the dramatic interest. And this can be done by
-controlling such means of attraction as we have just mentioned. When
-we look at the painting entitled “The Shepherdess,” facing page 21,
-our glance falls immediately upon the shepherdess, because the almost
-vertical line of her body forms a cross with the horizontal line of
-the sheep’s backs. Yet the design is so subtle that, unless we stop to
-analyze, we do not notice how the painter achieves his emphasis. We do
-not notice that the front of the woman’s body is really a continuation
-of the left edge of a tree which extends to the top of the frame, that
-her profile is the continuation of a line of foliage from another tree,
-that her staff makes right angles with her throat and with the back of
-her head, that the rhythmical contours of a sheep flow into her left
-hand and arm, and that a shadow from the lower center of the picture
-leads to her feet.
-
-If a painter establishes his emphasis so carefully in a picture which
-the beholder may regard for hours at a time, it would seem all the
-more urgent for a cinema composer to study out the correct emphasis
-for a pictorial moment which the spectator must grasp in only a second
-or two. It is extremely important, for the simple reason that, if the
-director does not deliberately draw the attention of the spectator to
-the dramatic interest in the picture, it is most likely that accident
-will emphasize some other part, as we have seen in the examples already
-discussed; and then, before the spectator has time to reason himself
-away from the false emphasis to the true interest, the action will go
-on to some other scene, and a part of the real message will be lost.
-
-[Illustration: From _The Spell of the Yukon_. There are too many
-distracting shapes in the left end of this picture. Mask over the
-cabin, the sleigh, and the two dogs farthest to the left, and the
-remaining part of the picture becomes a pleasing composition of line,
-shape, and tone. See page 56.]
-
-Let us illustrate this again by turning to another “still” from “The
-Spell of the Yukon,” facing page 57. The thing which attracts first and
-longest is the strange object in the upper left-hand corner. On the
-screen our eyes would wander away to the dogs and the man, but they
-would wander back again to that strange shape, because it is a law of
-visual attention that the strangest and most unfamiliar shape attracts
-most strongly. We would be curious about that shape, and by the time we
-had decided that it was an Alaskan sled, the picture would fade out and
-we would have missed the message, namely the affectionate companionship
-of the man and his dogs.
-
-If the sled had been more completely shown, or viewed from a different
-angle, or placed in a more natural position immediately behind a
-team of dogs, it would not have seemed strange and distracting. This
-composition could be greatly improved by simply eliminating the left
-third of it. If you cover up the sled and the two dogs nearest it with
-a sheet of paper you will see that what remains is a fairly pleasing
-arrangement, with considerably more emphasis on the man and the
-theme of his affection for the dogs, with a better pattern and more
-rhythmical lines.
-
-If the director had simplified his composition as we have suggested he
-might have eliminated the wrong emphasis and secured the right emphasis
-in one stroke. The dark figure of the man framed roughly in white and
-gray would have attracted attention by its tonal isolation. Emphasis
-by isolation involves simplicity and economy, and for that very
-reason, perhaps, this device is so often neglected by less experienced
-directors. They breathe the poisonous air of extravagance and thrash
-their arms in the heretical belief that multiplicity is power. Compare,
-for instance, the “still” of “Polly of the Circus,” facing page 79,
-with “The Banquet of the Officers of St. Andrew,” by Frans Hals,
-facing page 79, and you get at once the distinct impression that Hals’s
-picture depicts a larger crowd than the “still.” But you will be
-astonished to find that the painting actually contains but twelve men,
-while the “still” contains seventeen men, one woman, and one horse.
-
-In the painting every head is isolated by hat, ruff, costume, or panel,
-and seems to have plenty of room to move freely without bumping. Our
-eyes can study the contours and values of those heads without colliding
-with other interests. And the fact that each head is treated almost as
-though it were a separate portrait might be called a trick of design
-which makes us overestimate the number in the group, thus getting
-the impression of a throng. Surely this is good economy. Compare it
-with the extravagant composition of the circus crowd. There you see
-heads and bodies huddled together in a meaningless jumble. No interest
-is significantly framed, no two interests are properly spaced. The
-director may have swelled the wage roll, but he has shrivelled the
-art product. Perhaps it is not necessary to go further in support of
-our contention that certain visual values and devices of arrangement
-can be used, separately or in combination, to control the glances of
-spectators, and that, unless these means are properly used, pictorial
-impressiveness cannot be obtained. We have discussed the uses of
-a bright patch on a generally dark ground, long converging lines,
-crosses, sharp contrasts of tone and color, unfamiliar shapes, and
-isolation of subject. Scores of other principles of design, well known
-to painters, might be used to emphasize a screen picture during that
-moment of the action when all movement seems to have stopped. Of
-course, when the movement is actually or apparently resumed, emphasis
-will be controlled according to the laws by which motion appeals to the
-eye. But that is a subject for another chapter.
-
-To continue our analysis of fixed design, let us examine the methods
-whereby various pictorial elements may be fused into a unity. Every
-writer knows that a sentence is really a train of words which, though
-actually standing still on the paper, can carry the reader’s mind
-swiftly across the page. By various literary devices the reader’s
-interest is caught and carried from emphasis to emphasis, and by
-various devices the reader’s thoughts may be organized into a complete
-unity. So, too, the lines and shapes of a picture, however still they
-may stand for the moment on the screen have the power to carry the
-spectator’s eyes from interest to interest; and they may, if properly
-designed, guide his attention through the picture in such a way as to
-gather all of its parts into a complete unity.
-
-When the eyes are caught by something in a picture, they do not at
-first rest there, but proceed, as we have said, on a tour of inspection
-of the whole area within the frame of that picture, after which they
-return again to the first visual interest. In making this tour the eyes
-seek, or at least, follow a pattern. Let us test these statements by
-turning to the “still” facing page 61. You cannot see every point of
-the picture at once. Therefore your eyes range over it. Perhaps, now
-that we call your attention to it, you can feel your eyes moving as
-they follow the outlines of the white mass which is produced by the
-girl’s figure and dress. To make sure that you feel these movements,
-just look quickly from her head to her foot, to her right hand, to her
-head again, etc. Now you realize that the white mass is contained in a
-distinct triangle. That triangle is the pattern of the picture. Whether
-you like it or not makes no difference; the triangular path must be
-followed by your eyes.
-
-This little exercise shows that the eyes, unlike the lens of a camera,
-cannot see every part of a picture at once, but must range over it
-from point to point, repeating the tour again and again as long as the
-picture is in view. But, if we cannot see head, hand, and foot at once,
-it is evident that we must remember the head while we are observing the
-hand, that we must remember both the head and the hand while we are
-observing the foot, etc., else the whole picture could never be built
-up in our minds. It is also evident that the smoother the path, the
-more easily and quickly can the tour of inspection be made.
-
-The eye needs paths, finger-posts, and bridges to carry it from one
-part of a picture to another, a need which painters discovered ages
-ago, and responded to by uniting the lines of their drawings into
-some sort of image or design. Thus the old masters often constructed
-their paintings on the design of a circle, a rectangle, a triangle, a
-diamond, a right-angled cross, an X shape, an S curve, or some other
-equally simple pattern, finding by experience that this practice
-always helped the beholder to grasp the picture as a unity. But they
-were real magicians, those medieval masters, and as such knew how to
-conceal their designs. Their technique, which the probing critic lays
-bare, is neither seen nor suspected by the average beholder who stands
-worshipful before their paintings. In fact, the technique of graphic
-design can be effective only when it works subconsciously in the
-spectator’s mind. Furthermore, those old masters knew how to achieve
-many results through simple means. They knew how to produce unity,
-emphasis, balance, and rhythm by the skillful manipulation of even a
-single device.
-
-[Illustration: _A Triangle._ The fundamental pattern in a picture
-should not be obtrusive, as in this too obviously triangular shape.
-Compare this “still” with the illustration facing page 76. See also
-pages 59, 72 and 76.]
-
-By contrast many motion picture directors of to-day are mere bunglers.
-For example, in the “still” portrait which we have just studied there
-is unity and a definite, though heavy, equilibrium, but there is no
-rhythm, and the emphasis is sadly misplaced. The pose of the woman and
-her relation to the rug and the background admittedly make a unity. Our
-eyes ranging over the triangle, can easily grasp all that is important
-in the picture and leave out the rest; but the triangular design is
-severe and makes a wrong emphasis. In the first place, the design is
-too obviously a triangle. We think of it as a mathematical figure, and
-thus waste part of the attention which should be directed upon the
-woman herself. And, in the second place, the accent is at the wrong
-corner and on the wrong side of the triangle. The base of the triangle
-is accented by containing the longest line in the composition, the line
-being further emphasized by its straightness and by the sharp contrast
-between black and white which it marks. This emphasis is, of course,
-wrong, for we are certainly not interested in the pattern of this rug.
-There is also no reason why our attention should be called to the
-woman’s foot, or to the adjacent corner of the white panel in the rug,
-yet our glance is attracted to that region by the strange zigzag line
-described by the slipper and that white corner. These accents are wrong
-at first glance, and they remain wrong as long as the picture lasts,
-because every time we repeat the tour of inspection our eyes rest a
-moment on these false interests.
-
-To show that these mistakes lie entirely in the treatment, and not
-in the device of the triangle, we need only turn to the painting of
-“Mme. Lebrun and Her Daughter,” facing page 76. Here is a composition
-distinctly triangular in design, yet one may have admired this picture
-hundreds of times without observing that fact. Here is unity, without
-obviousness or severity. Our eyes leap to the apex of the triangle,
-and there find the chief interest, the head of the mother. And, as
-we continue gazing, our attention still favors the mother, because
-the white areas of her shoulder, arm, and robe attract the eye more
-strongly than the other portions of the picture. Here, too, is graceful
-balance and a flowing rhythm in every line.
-
-If we consider merely the dramatic action of the subjects, as the
-motion picture directors so often do, we observe that the poses in Mme.
-Lebrun’s painting are natural and easy, that the gesture is graceful
-and telling, and we realize how completely and impressively the
-technique of design, the craft of composition, expresses the message of
-the painter.
-
-A part of Mme. Lebrun’s technique consisted in eliminating the setting,
-because in this particular case she found it easier to express her
-meaning without describing environment. Setting may often well be
-eliminated in the movies, too, as in “Moon-Gold,” discussed below; but
-usually the physical environment of action, as has been stated rather
-exhaustively in Chapter VIII of “The Art of Photoplay Making,” can be
-dramatized more vividly in the movies than in any other narrative art.
-And it is an interesting problem of design to weave places into a
-definite unity with persons, things, and action.
-
-Let us see how this problem has been met in the cabin scene of
-“The Spell of the Yukon,” facing page 28, which, in spite of the
-too conspicuous window, already spoken of, has a rather successful
-pictorial arrangement. For the sake of experiment, this “still” may be
-analyzed by making a simple drawing, as in the sketch facing page 28.
-We see that the design consists essentially of an oval shape surrounded
-by rectangles. The rectangles may be seen in the lines of the window,
-the bunk, the table, etc. The oval, which includes all of the dramatic
-action, may be traced from the boy’s head, down the boy’s arm to the
-man’s right knee and leg, up the man’s left hand, arm, and shoulder to
-his head, and thence across to the boy’s head again. In the center of
-this oval is the hand holding a pipe and making a telling gesture in
-the story.
-
-This oval design, taken by itself, is an excellent composition. The
-lines furnish easy paths for the eye, and bind the boy and man together
-into a dramatic unity. There is, to be sure, only an imaginary line
-between the faces of the man and the boy, but that imaginary line is
-nevertheless as vivid as any visible thing in the picture. In fact, the
-break in the visible part of the oval serves to arrest our attention
-upon the faces for a moment every time our glance swings through the
-oval pattern. Leading toward this oval are the straight lines of the
-bunk and the table, thus serving to give unity and force. But the lines
-of the window make an isolated pattern which, instead of leading one’s
-eye toward the dramatic focus, does just the opposite. The design,
-as a whole, therefore, is imperfect. And, though we see much in the
-picture, we do not see it entirely with ease.
-
-If we turn to “Derby Day,” facing this page, a drawing by the English
-artist, Thomas Rowlandson, we shall find a more interesting design
-and a surer control of accents. Here the basic theme is a long line.
-By “line” in this case we mean, not merely a single stroke of the
-pencil, but any succession of lines, shapes, or even spots, so arranged
-that they make a track for the eye to follow. In “Derby Day” the long
-swinging line of the road is the basis of the design. Yet this line is
-not quite identical with the wheel tracks. It begins, in fact, with the
-feet of the donkey at the lower right-hand corner of the frame, and
-follows through the dog, the baskets under the wagon, the hub of the
-wheel, then over the heads of the group, through the hubs of the third
-wagon, then with a slight downward drop it swings along the edge of the
-field and the hedge, and finally leads through the horses and wagons,
-out at the left end of the picture.
-
-[Illustration: _Derby Day_, a drawing by Thomas Rowlandson, showing the
-kind of composition which could be effectively used in photoplays. See
-page 64.]
-
-[Illustration: Analysis of the fundamental design in _Derby Day_
-(above). See page 64.]
-
-Upon this line the whole design is built, and rather cleverly, too,
-for our attention is controlled by the subtle ordination of accents.
-At the right end of the line is the most unusual and striking shape in
-the picture, namely, the curved figure described by the wagon-cover
-and the wheel. Such a strange shape, as we have pointed out earlier in
-this chapter, has a strong attraction for the eye, and in this picture
-marks emphasis Number One. Emphasis Number Two occurs near the middle
-of the road at the turn, where four or more lines meet to form a cross.
-These lines are produced by the basic line already described, by the
-conspicuous tree, and by the hedge which runs up to it from the
-left side of the bottom frame. Here again are illustrated visual laws
-already discussed. The third emphasis in this picture is where the road
-runs out on the left, our eyes being drawn in that direction by the
-familiar device of converging lines. Observe that the mass of trees
-in the background forms a distinct wedge with the point toward the
-left, that the wagon train itself tapers sharply, that the three trees
-along the road are successively smaller toward the left, and that the
-field on that side of the road tapers somewhat in the same direction.
-The combined effect of these converging lines and tapering shapes
-carries our vision along the road so insistently that we follow it in
-imagination beyond the frame.
-
-Thus by the magic of pictorial design our vision is caught and so
-controlled that a single glance, sweeping the picture in the direction
-ordained by the artist, gives us a definite feeling of movement.
-No matter who looks, or how often, he will see the accents in the
-order we have named--covered wagon, turn of the road, far end of the
-road--and will thus get the main story of the picture in the shortest
-time, the simplest terms, and with the right emphasis. If this picture
-were to be thrown upon the screen for only a second we are confident
-that every spectator would instantly get the primary meaning, (1)
-wagon loads of merry-makers (2) are swinging (3) up the road. There
-are minor interests, too, such as the comic figures and actions of
-the characters, the prancing of dogs and horses, the rustic cottage,
-the tops of trees, clouds, etc.; but these are kept subsidiary in the
-design and yet, as they emerge one by one, they are found to be in
-complete harmony with the main theme, the movement of merry-makers
-along a country road.
-
-Of course, if a scene like this were filmed and thrown upon the screen,
-the wagon train would actually be moving, and we would perceive the
-motion, rather than infer it or feel it, as we do from the fixed
-design of the drawing. Yet, if the cinema director were indifferent
-as to where he placed his accents, and trusted to chance for his
-pictorial pattern, we would surely not perceive that motion in its
-full significance. Now, if lines, shapes and tonal values in a certain
-arrangement can clarify and emphasize the message of a picture, it
-is obvious that in some other arrangement they could obscure and
-minimize that message. For example, if “Derby Day” were filmed, and
-the composition were left to accident or to the bungling of some
-director ignorant of the laws of design, it is quite probable that
-he would “feature” the “picturesque” cottage, or perhaps a “cunning”
-dog, a “scenic” tree, the “patriotic pull” of the flag, or the
-“side-splitting” corpulency of a woman. No spectator would then see or
-feel the dominant idea of this subject, which is the joy of going away
-on the open road.
-
-Right here it is a pleasure to state for the benefit of any reader who
-may not have seen “The Covered Wagon,” that James Cruze, the director
-of that photoplay, did not bungle his composition. Always the historic
-wagon train of the pioneers strikes the dominant note of the scene,
-seeming to compose itself spontaneously into a pictorial pattern
-which accents the dramatic meaning. This is true even when there is
-no physical movement. In the arroyo scene, for example, facing page
-93, the wagons, drawn up into formation for a camp, harmonize sternly
-with the savage-looking cliffs, and their zigzag arrangement somehow
-suggests the sharp action of the fight with the Indians which fate
-holds in store for this very place.
-
-Enough has now been said to illustrate how design in a picture can
-control our attention during the pauses and arrested moments on the
-screen, and by so doing can relieve the eyes of unnecessary, wasteful
-work and give unity and emphasis to the message of the picture. But
-still other powers reside in design. While it hastens our grasp of
-meanings, and even accentuates those meanings, it can affect the mind
-in other ways that are still more important. And if we delve deeper
-into these ways we shall come out with a clearer vision of the artistic
-possibilities of the movies.
-
-
-
-
-CHAPTER V.
-
-RHYTHM AND REPOSE IN FIXED DESIGN
-
-
-Directness, ease, emphasis, unity--these are the things which we have
-just demanded of cinema composition, the pictorial form which contains,
-and at the same time reveals, the story of a photoplay. But we demand
-something more. We do not get complete æsthetic pleasure from any
-composition which merely contains and reveals something else. The
-vessel, while serving to convey its treasure, should have a charm of
-its own. In poetry, for example, we are not satisfied with the language
-which merely expresses the poetic content in clear and forceful style.
-We crave poetic language, too, words and sentences that sound like
-music and that by their very form appeal to our fancy.
-
-In fact most people who have a highly developed taste for pictorial
-art, consider that beauty of treatment is more important than beauty
-of subject. Their emotions are stirred by something in the arrangement
-of the lines, masses, tones, and colors, something that serves other
-purposes than those of clearness, coherence, and emphasis. What
-that something is, has always been a great question to students of
-æsthetics. Mr. Clive Bell, for example, suggests that the essential
-beauty of art lies in “significant form.” But you have to read through
-his very interesting book entitled “Art” to get some notion of what he
-means by that term. Miss Ethel D. Puffer, in her book “The Psychology
-of Beauty,” has developed the very illuminating theory that the effect
-of beauty on the human mind is both to stimulate and give repose. And
-we shall adopt her theory for a while as a basis for a brief discussion
-of rhythm and balance in cinematic forms.
-
-The terms “stimulation and repose,” are, of course, contrary. The
-feelings which they describe are in conflict. Yet this inner conflict
-between stimulation and repose always takes place when a person is
-faced with great beauty of art or nature. Any one of us can testify
-to that from experience. When listening to music, when reading a
-poem, when watching a play, when gazing at a temple, at a statue, or
-a painting, we have felt something strangely stirring and at the same
-time soothing, something both kindling and cooling, an inspiration to
-do great deeds, and at the same time a desire to rest for the while in
-satisfied contemplation.
-
-Applying this theory to pictorial composition on the screen, we may say
-that the quality of balance in line, pattern, and tone suggests repose,
-while pulsating rhythm stimulates us to activity. This application at
-least has the merit of giving us something definite to discuss.
-
-Looking at the mechanical aspects of balance in a picture we shall
-see that it can easily be analyzed. There is the balance of quantity
-which may be seen by comparing the right half of the picture with
-the left half, or the upper half with the lower half. Balance of
-quantity is often connected with symmetry in the fundamental pattern,
-as in the figure of the triangle. Further, there is balance through
-depth, the foreground weighing against the background. Another kind of
-balance is that of echoing motifs, a sort of fulfillment of the eye’s
-expectations. There is also a balance of interests, which is quite
-different from the balance of quantity, because a small quantity of
-one thing may have greater weight of interest than a large quantity of
-something else. And there is the balance of contrasts, such as light
-against shadow, or straight lines against curved lines. How balance
-in all of these forms may be obtained in cinema composition will be
-discussed in the first half of this chapter.
-
-One of the simplest tests for balance in a static picture is to draw a
-vertical line through the center of the picture, and then to estimate
-the weight, so to speak, of the two halves of the composition thus
-formed. If we try the experiment with the “still” from the photoplay
-“Maria Rosa,” facing page 71, we see at once that the left half is too
-heavy. Besides containing by far the greater dramatic interest, it
-contains too many objects, shapes, and lines to attract the eye.
-
-[Illustration: From _Maria Rosa_. An interesting composition, but
-thrown out of balance by too much weight in the left half. See page 70.]
-
-Now if this “still” were a student’s painting which fell under the
-eye of the master, he might suggest various ways of “saving” it. For
-example, some of the bric-a-brac might be “painted out” from the
-dressing table, the lower lines of the mirror might be softened, and
-the door reflected in the mirror might be painted out, while some
-similar interest might be painted in at the right of the picture. Or
-if this “still” were an amateur print for your kodak album, you might
-improve the picture considerably by trimming off the right end as far
-as the woman’s skirt; that is, about one-fifth of the entire width. You
-can estimate the value of that improvement right now by shutting off
-that part of the “still” with a sheet of paper or any convenient thing
-that may be used as a mask. Another picture may be formed by shutting
-off the left third, just including the reflection of the woman in the
-mirror. What then remains is a composition in beautiful balance, which,
-incidentally, appeals more strongly to the imagination than the “still”
-taken as a whole.
-
-But neither trimming nor repainting nor retouching can be employed to
-alter a bad grouping that has been recorded on a film. We sympathize,
-therefore, with the conscientious cinema composer who has made a
-mistake in composition, for he is forced either to “shoot” the scene
-again or to clip it out entirely from the film.
-
-Another test for balance of quantity is to draw a horizontal line
-through the center of the composition and weigh the visual values in
-the upper and lower halves thus formed. In the case of horizontal
-divisions, however, we have accustomed ourselves to expect greater
-weight at the bottom, because that is the natural arrangement of
-material things about us. Keeping this fact in mind let us analyze
-the “still” from “Audrey,” facing page 45. A glance shows us that the
-composition is top-heavy, for almost everything of interest lies above
-the center line. But turn the picture upside down, and look upon it as
-though it were a pattern meant to be viewed in that position; you feel
-immediately that the distribution of weights is more pleasing. Now hold
-it as if the right end were the bottom, and the composition takes on
-a heavy balance, with a commonplace symmetry of four long, rising and
-spreading lines. This is so because the right half, which is really
-too heavy when the picture is viewed in the position intended by the
-director, seems to be a weight in place when considered as the bottom
-of a pattern.
-
-Yet we may find beauty in this “still,” if we only have the patience
-to corner it. Cover up three-quarters of the composition, that is,
-all of the left half, and all of the lower half; then the remaining
-quarter will contain a pleasant composition, and a delightful appeal
-to the imagination. There is in that upper right-hand quarter, both
-balance and rhythm, both repose and stimulation. The heroine’s gestures
-carry our attention to the left, in the direction she is going; but
-her glances, and the attracting power of the converging trees, carry
-our attention to the right. And in the course of this easy playing to
-and fro our fancy swings out beyond the frame into realms of our own
-imagination.
-
-But there is still another test for pictorial equilibrium. Besides
-the balance of one side against the other and of the top against the
-bottom, a picture should preserve a balance between the foreground
-and the background. This assumes that the picture really suggests the
-dimension of depth, which is usually the case. Interesting exceptions,
-however, may appear occasionally, as in the “still” facing page 61,
-and the painting facing page 76. One may even find entire photoplays
-with scenes done in two dimensions only. For example, “Moon-Gold,” a
-Will Bradley production, released in 1921, presents a story of Pierrot,
-Columbine, and Harlequin in a series of scenes in a single plane.
-There is no background except blackness, and there is no foreground at
-all. The pictures are as flat as a poster. Such elimination of setting
-may have artistic merit, especially in stories of familiar or naïve
-themes, but in more involved stories it is desirable to include the
-whole setting of the action, not only because of the dramatic power of
-environment, but also because of the pictorial wealth which may thus be
-added.
-
-To test this third balance of a picture you need only imagine a curtain
-of glass dropped so as to separate equally the interests near the
-spectator from those farther away. Such a plane is, in fact, usually
-imagined by a painter when he lays out his design. Though he does not
-cut his ground mechanically into two equal areas, he usually does
-distribute his subjects so that the spectator needs not feel that the
-foreground is only a long waste to be crossed, or that the background
-is but an empty region which lies beyond everything of interest.
-
-The word “depth” in connection with the screen has doubtless made our
-readers think of the stereoscopic motion picture as produced by the
-Teleview and other companies. Such pictures are truly remarkable in
-their mechanical power of showing physical depth through a scene. They
-show you the images clearly separated, some near and some far away,
-so that you feel as if you could really walk in and out among them.
-To be able to produce such an illusion is something that any inventor
-may well be proud of; and yet it is doubtful that the stereoscopic
-picture will bring about any improvement in the artistic composition of
-the motion picture. Most of us can recall the “stereoscope and views”
-which we used to find on the center tables of our country aunts. How
-well we remember the mystifying illusion of depth which was created.
-How well we remember also that there was the same depth in the reeking
-stockyards of Kansas City as in the cathedral aisle of Rheims! That
-illustrates the shortcoming of purely mechanical things in the service
-of art. The stereoscopic machinery cannot in itself create beauty.
-It cannot automatically so select trees or distribute people over a
-landscape that balance and rhythm, unity and emphasis will appear in
-the finished picture. Unfortunately, for the uninspired artist, the
-mechanician cannot help him.
-
-It may be asked whether stereoscopic pictures may not be utilized to
-get sculptural effects upon the screen. The answer is that if a piece
-of sculpture had to be viewed through a single peep-hole and under an
-unchanging light it would not really have a sculptural appeal. The
-characteristic appeal of sculpture is due largely to the fact that it
-is possible for the beholder to shift his gaze at will from one side
-of the statue to the other. He even walks around the statue, thus
-getting ever new aspects of the subject until he has completed the
-circle of inspection. And this shifting view is governed entirely by
-his own interest and choice. The sculptor has deliberately shaped his
-marble so that the many aspects will be interesting variations of the
-same theme. That many-sidedness of sculpture is one of its distinctive
-qualities as art. But when you look at a stereoscopic motion picture
-it is absolutely impossible for you to “see around” the objects any
-farther than the camera has done, no matter how much you shift your
-position. The other sides of all the objects and figures might as well
-be missing. Your point of view is fixed absolutely in the stereoscopic
-picture, just as it is in the ordinary “flat” picture. But perhaps
-there are other ways in which the Teleview and similar inventions
-can provide new opportunities for the cinema artist. That remains to
-be shown by experimentation, and, of course, such experimentation is
-welcome and should be encouraged.
-
-However, for all purposes of pictorial art a sufficient illusion of
-depth can be produced in the “flat” picture. This can be done by the
-simplest instruments and means of picture making, even by the use of
-a lead pencil and a piece of paper. There are only two secrets of
-perspective. One is to render parallel lines, that is, lines which are
-actually parallel in the subject, so that they converge in the distance
-and, if continued, would meet at a “vanishing point.” The other is to
-render objects with increasing dimness as they occupy positions at
-increasing distances away from us.
-
-One might suppose that in a photograph these problems of perspective
-would take care of themselves. But they do not, as may be seen by
-turning to the “still” of the conservatory scene, facing page 100.
-There we find a jumble of stuff apparently all in the same vertical
-plane. Why does the standing woman wear a palm leaf in her hair? Why
-does the man wear the top of a doorway upon his head? And why does
-the seated woman bury her head in the ferns? They do not actually, of
-course, carry on thus hilariously; but some one has carelessly coaxed
-the background into the foreground by making remote objects intensely
-distinct, instead of subduing them into the soft values of distance.
-
-But we have dwelt so long on the subject of balance in design that
-we fear the reader may think we have over-emphasized the point. No
-one quality in pictorial composition should be out of balance with
-the others. Thus, too sharp an emphasis may violate balance, and too
-perfect a balance may violate rhythm. After all, the kind of balance we
-desire in pictorial design is that which is sufficient, but no more.
-We do not, as a rule, enjoy the mathematical figure of the equilateral
-triangle, standing heavily on its base, because it is balanced beyond
-the need of any living thing. It suggests the dead repose of the
-pyramids of Egypt, the tombs of her forgotten kings. Such a severe
-design is utterly unsuitable, therefore, in the portrait of a lithe
-young lady clad in silks and tulle, as illustrated in the “still”
-facing page 61. It is flat and hard, and the eye following forever its
-monotonous outlines misses the variety of rhythm. Yet a triangle, you
-say, serves the purpose of unity and emphasis. Alter it then by making
-it narrower, with a less obvious base, and by swinging a live rhythm
-into its sides, as in the painting of “Mme. Lebrun and Her Daughter,”
-facing this page.
-
-But this brings us to a discussion of the mysterious quality of rhythm.
-Rhythm is entirely too evasive for a tight definition, but perhaps we
-can learn much by saying things about it.
-
-[Illustration: _Mme. LeBrun and Her Daughter_, a painting by Mme.
-Vigée-Lebrun. A good figure composition on the basis of a triangle.
-Compare with the “still” shown facing page 61. See also pages 62 and
-76.]
-
-Rhythm in music may be partially described as a peculiar alternating
-movement, with an alternation between sounds of different pitch,
-quality, and quantity; between different sound groups, and between
-sound and silence. The rhythm of visible motion is of a somewhat
-similar nature, as we shall see in Chapter VIII. But a sense of
-alternating movement may be produced by things which are not themselves
-in motion. We can, therefore, find rhythm in fixed lines, shapes,
-tones, colors, and textures. This we shall call rhythm of fixed design.
-
-The peculiar thing about the element of alternation in rhythm which
-distinguishes it from mere repetition, is that it is not regular, like
-the swinging of a pendulum, but contains numerous variations from
-regularity. But, while the symmetry of rhythm is only partial, so also
-the variety is limited. It is the combined effect of these two factors
-which makes rhythm delightful. Repetition or symmetry in a line or a
-pattern is pleasurable because, as explained in Chapter III, it enables
-us to see much with ease. But, at the same time, subtle or even bold
-variations are appealing because they relieve us of monotony, stimulate
-our interest, and lead our eyes in search of further variations.
-
-A familiar rhythm of line is that of the reverse curve, which Hogarth
-called “the line of beauty.” This line is beautifully used in the
-painting “Daylight and Lamplight,” facing page 39. Observe the effect
-of alternation with variety in the lines which bound the urn, the
-woman’s figure, and the various shadows and lights in the background.
-Your eye sweeps over those paths without effort, and you get a sense of
-movement, as though you yourself were drawing these lines with a brush
-or crayon. Analyze the composition and you will see how richly the
-lines are woven together. Compare all the small curves with each other,
-compare all the larger curves, all the short straight lines, all the
-longer straight lines, etc., and you will discover an amazing amount of
-alternation and repetition, with an equally amazing amount of deviation
-from regularity.
-
-Imagine that the painting which we have just analyzed is an accented
-moment in a motion picture, and you must imagine another similar design
-a few seconds earlier in the action and still another one a few seconds
-later, as the woman walks gracefully through the room. In fact, there
-would be a whole series of similar designs during the brief time that
-the woman’s figure and the urn are in decorative contact. The instant
-of action which the painter has chosen to fix on canvas might well be
-the same instant which you would select as the pictorial climax in this
-motion picture. This climax, accented perhaps with a pause, accented
-also by the pictorial approach and departure, is something which you
-would long remember as a rhythmical moment in the photoplay.
-
-In the picture which we have just described the rhythm is found
-chiefly in the continuity and richness of line and in a certain active
-balancing of similar with dissimilar lines. The design is simple,
-almost plain. It is a single pattern which does not recur again within
-the frame. Quite different in type is the composition of a group
-picture such as “The Banquet of the Officers of St. Andrew,” facing
-page 79, where the rhythm is in the flow of patterns rather than in
-the flow of lines. Take a hat, for example, as the decorative theme
-and observe how definitely, yet how subtly, that theme is four times
-varied. Note further how the curves of the hats are echoed, always with
-variety, in the ruffs.
-
-[Illustration: From _Polly of the Circus_. Compare this “still” with
-_Banquet of the Officers of St. Andrew_ (below) and you get at once
-the distinct impression that the painting depicts a larger crowd than
-the “still.” As a matter of fact, the painter has used only twelve men
-to produce his effect, while the motion picture director has employed
-seventeen men, a woman, and a horse. This difference illustrates the
-practical utility of pictorial design. See page 57.]
-
-[Illustration: _Banquet of the Officers of St. Andrew_, a painting by
-Frans Hals. See above and page 78.]
-
-But so many curves would make the picture too rich in quality were
-it not for the skillful introduction of straight lines to make, as
-it were, a series of alternating notes. You observe immediately the
-long straight lines of the windows, of the two flags, and of the
-table. But you do not at first observe that there are several dozen
-shorter straight lines, and that, curiously enough, they are nearly
-all parallel to each other. Take as a key the sash of the first seated
-officer, counting from the left, and you will find a surprising number
-of similarities to this motif throughout the composition, all the way
-from the shadows on the window casing in the upper left hand corner
-to the edge of the table in the lower right hand corner. Yet, because
-these similar straight lines are so frequently alternated with varying
-curves, we get from the picture a stirring sense of a swinging movement.
-
-Here, again, is an arrested moment of action which might conceivably
-have come out of a motion picture. What the arrangement of the twelve
-men might have been at other moments of the scene we do not know.
-Perhaps they were all sitting when the scene opened; perhaps they had
-all arisen before it closed; but for this one instant, at least, they
-have resolved themselves into an interesting design of simple patterns
-in a rhythmical series.
-
-Another source of rhythm in a fixed picture may be the tonal
-gradations. In a painting there would be a play of colors from hue
-to hue and from tint to shade. In ordinary photography there may
-be a similar play from deep black to intense white through all the
-intervening values. It is all a question of lighting and choice of
-subjects for the light to fall upon. The painter has an advantage over
-the photographer because he does not have to record light and shadow
-exactly as they are on the subject. He can soften his shadows or paint
-them out completely. He can alter his tones and values at will, even
-after the painting is practically finished. As an offset to this the
-cinema composer has, of course, the power of presenting movement,
-fugues and passages of light and shadow. And, by the use of the newest
-apparatus for lighting, and by careful attention to the color values
-and textures of sets, costumes, etc., he can also produce many of the
-rhythmical effects of gradation in fixed tones which we are accustomed
-to look for in painting.
-
-As time goes on we shall more and more often find pictorial moments on
-the screen which exhibit as fine a rhythm of fixed tones and masses as,
-for example, Van Dyck’s “Portrait of Charles I,” facing page 163. If
-you draw a straight line across this picture in almost any direction,
-it will mark a great variety of graded values, a lovely shifting of
-light and shadow, with no sharp contrasts except those which serve to
-attract the spectator’s attention to the head of the king. There is
-perfect harmony of composition here. The tones are in a rhythmical
-design, yet it is a rhythm which keeps the emphasis on the focal
-interest and preserves the balance throughout the painting.
-
-Two or three men, a horse, and a bit of landscape is no uncommon
-subject in photoplays. We have reason, therefore, to expect that from
-long practice all directors will learn how to treat it pictorially, and
-with ever new variety of beauty.
-
-The general field of composition in fixed design has now been surveyed.
-We have tried to show that a good pictorial composition, even from a
-commercial point of view, is one which provides instant emphasis on the
-focal interest; which unites this focal interest with the other parts
-of the picture by means of a certain arrangement, or pattern; which
-keeps all of its values in a reposeful balance, and which pulsates with
-a vital rhythm. These four qualities--emphasis, unity, balance, and
-rhythm--are necessary in what might be called the mechanics of beauty,
-the technique of design. We admit, cheerfully, that the beauty of a
-given masterpiece cannot be explained by pointing out an observance of
-certain fundamental laws of design, for an uninspired artist might obey
-all these laws without ever achieving beauty, just as a machinist might
-obey all the laws of mechanics without ever inventing a machine. But we
-insist that an observance of pictorial laws is a first condition that
-must be fulfilled by the artist before the mysterious quality of beauty
-will arise in his work.
-
-The accented moment in a pictorial movement, which we have studied from
-so many angles, is, of course, not fixed on the screen for any great
-length of time, never for more than a few seconds, though it may remain
-fixed in memory for years. Nor is it a separate thing upon the screen.
-It rises from an earlier moment and flows into a later one. The rapid
-succession of momentarily fixed pictures on the screen is, in fact,
-what gives the illusion of motion. Yet it would not, therefore, be
-correct to say that the motion picture as a whole can be made beautiful
-by making each separate exposure in itself a beautiful composition.
-The successive pictures must play, one into the next, in a stream of
-composition which contains new delights for the eye, and which, alas,
-contains new dangers for the ignorant or careless maker of pictures.
-What these delights and dangers are we shall see in the following
-chapters.
-
-
-
-
-CHAPTER VI
-
-MOTIONS IN A PICTURE
-
-
-Pictorial motion is thousands of years older than the motion picture.
-It is as old as the oldest art of all, the dance. Before man had
-learned how to weave his own fancies into plots, or how to make
-drawings of things that he saw, he had doubtless often feasted his
-eyes upon the rhythmic beauty created by dancers. Their art was
-the composition of motions. We can well imagine how they began by
-exhibiting bodily postures, gestures, and mimicry; how they proceeded
-to add other movements, such as the fluttering of garments, the
-brandishing of weapons, the waving of flaring torches, and how they, in
-time, made their composition more involved by swinging themselves into
-swaying groups, circling and threading fanciful patterns.
-
-As a form of art the dance has been preserved through the ages in an
-apparently unbroken history. And it has had various off-shoots besides;
-for religious and secular processions, pantomime, and even drama, have
-had their beginnings in the dance. Pictorial motion was to be seen
-two thousand years ago in the Roman triumphs and processions, whose
-gaudiest features survive in the familiar circus parade of today. And
-the circus itself is in a sense the pictorial motion of animals and men.
-
-In the presentation of drama, too, pictorial motion has always played
-a vital part. When we look back over the history of the theater we
-see that the managers were never satisfied with the mere physical
-exhibition of actors and dancers, but began very early to add other
-motions to their performance. A large variety of motions was added by
-bringing animals upon the scenes. Fire was put into the service of
-show. We know that its flame and flicker, borne in torches or beating
-upon the witches’ caldron, was not uncommon on Shakespeare’s stage.
-Water in the form of leaping cascades and playing fountains was used
-at least two hundred years ago to make the scene more pictorial. More
-recently, wind has been produced artificially in order to give motion
-to draperies, flags, or foliage.
-
-All this amounts to something far more than an attempt to bring nature
-upon the stage. It is the creation of new beauty. The kind of beauty
-which professional entertainers have for thousands of years spun
-together from various motions into patterns simple or subtle, is the
-beauty of art, for it comes from human personality expressing itself in
-forms and combinations never found as such in nature.
-
-Now, if these showmen are really artists, at least in intent, we may
-well ask how they have combined their motions so as to produce the
-pleasing effects which they desired. Have they worked hit-or-miss
-and achieved beauty only by accident, or have they intentionally or
-instinctively obeyed certain laws of the human eye and mind?
-
-How does the director of a motion picture make sure that pleasing
-motion will appear upon the screen? Does he alter, or select, his
-subjects? Does he choose his point of view? Does he patiently wait for
-the right moment? Or must beauty come by accident, as music might come
-from a cat’s running over the keyboard of a piano?
-
-There must be laws of pictorial motion, just as there are laws of
-color, design, modelling, architectural construction, all of which
-appeal to the eye without visible motion. And, since the motion picture
-can capture and combine and reproduce a greater variety of moving
-things than was ever before possible in the history of art, it seems
-particularly important that we make earnest efforts to find out under
-what laws these manifold motions may be organized into art.
-
-In studying the movies one might easily come to the conclusion that
-some directors aim only to make motions life-like. Their whole creed
-seems to be that a heart-broken woman should move her shoulders and
-chest as though she really were heart-broken, that a goat should act
-exactly like a goat, and that a windmill should behave itself exactly
-like a windmill. Now, it may be very desirable, as far as it goes, that
-an emotion be “registered” fitly. But to aim at fitting expression
-alone is to aim at naturalness alone. And this is not enough, because
-there may be natural ugliness, and because even the beauty of nature is
-essentially different from the beauty of art.
-
-Shakespeare’s plays are not admired simply because they reveal human
-character truthfully. Rembrandt’s paintings are not preserved in
-museums merely because they are truthful representations of Dutchmen.
-The Venus of Milo would not have a room to herself in the Louvre if
-the statue were nothing more than a life-like figure of a woman partly
-dressed. In drama, poetry, fiction, painting, sculpture, and music,
-it has never been considered that appropriateness, naturalness, or
-truthfulness was in itself sufficient to distinguish the work as art.
-And it surely cannot be so in the movies.
-
-It certainly has not been so in the earlier arts of motion. The dance
-as a form of expression is beautiful, but it is so far from natural
-that if the average voter started out to express his joy or grief, or
-love or defiance, the way a dancer does on the stage, he would be given
-a free ride to the psychopathic ward. The stage pantomime is charming,
-but if you behaved in the presence of your true love the way Pierrot
-and Columbine behave, he or she, as the case may be, would probably
-decide that you were too much of a clown ever to become a responsible
-parent. The circus, too, though not properly to be classed as a form
-of art, combines and presents a vast number of interesting motions
-which you never expect to see outside the big tent. Dancers, pantomime
-actors, circus masters and performers, all clearly strive to collect
-our money by showing us the kind of motions which nature herself does
-not show.
-
-But do not become alarmed. We do not propose to establish a school of
-unnatural acting in the movies. Let the women and men and greyhounds
-and weeping willows and brooks be as natural as they can be, like
-themselves and not like each other. Natural, yes, providing they be
-not natural in an ugly way. If a brook is running in one direction
-as naturally as it can, and a greyhound is running in the opposite
-direction as naturally as he can, the combination of their contrary
-movements may not be pleasing in a motion picture. Art is art, not
-because it reflects some actual bit of nature, but because it is
-endowed with some beauty made by man.
-
-What other properties pictorial motion should have, besides correct
-representation of action has been partly told in Chapter III, where
-the demands of ease and economy of vision were made a condition
-concomitant with beauty. We may further apply the same tests which have
-been applied to fixed design. But, in order to get a firm grasp of our
-subject let us first reduce pictorial motions to their simplest forms.
-
-The simplest motion of all is the moving spot, especially when it is
-entirely unrelated to a setting or background; that is, the kind of
-moving spot which the spectator may see without at the same time seeing
-any other thing, either fixed or moving. A familiar example in nature
-is the dark dot of a bird flying high above us in a cloudless sky. An
-example from the screen is the effect of a ball of fire shot from a
-Roman candle through darkness, as in the battle scenes of Griffith’s
-“Birth of a Nation.” But even so simple a moving thing as a spot has
-two properties which are very important to the composer of motions. The
-moving spot, like all other motions, has direction and velocity. The
-buzzard soaring slowly in large circles affects us in one way, while
-the hawk swooping downward sharply, or the crow flying in a straight
-line, or the bat fluttering crazily in the air, affects us in quite a
-different way.
-
-When direction and velocity are controlled, even a single moving spot
-may describe beautiful motion. Witness an airplane maneuvering high in
-the sky, or a torch waved gracefully in the darkness. Beauty springs
-from control; ugliness follows lack of control. But control is no easy
-thing in the movies, for it is rare indeed that a director has only a
-single moving point to manage. Almost always, he has the problem of
-relative direction and relative speed. Moving things must be related
-to other moving things, and also to fixed things. Even if the picture
-consists only of a torch waved against a black background, we have the
-problem of relating that motion to the four fixed lines of the frame of
-the screen.
-
-But can we expect a motion picture director to stop and think of so
-small a matter as a ball thrown from one hand to another, to ask
-himself whether such an action is beautifully related, in direction
-and velocity, to everything else in the picture, fixed or moving?
-Yes, we can expect him to do so until he becomes artist enough to
-think of these matters without stopping. He should think about
-pictorial composition until he can obey its laws without thought. Let
-him remember that even a flock of geese can compose themselves so
-appealingly in the sky and a herd of cows can wind so gracefully down a
-hillside that a tender girl and a tough hobo will gaze alike upon them
-in open-mouthed admiration.
-
-The geese in the sky and the cows on the hillside are only a lot of
-moving spots, until they arrange, or compose, themselves. They may
-then illustrate the second type of moving object, that of the moving
-line. A line may, for example, move along its own length in a way
-which pleases the eyes. Such motions we see in the slender waterfall,
-in the narrow stream, in such inanimate things as the long belting in
-a factory, or the glowing line of a shooting star, and in the files of
-geese, or cattle, or marching men.
-
-A line may move in other directions besides that of its own length. It
-may swing stiffly from one end, as in the case of a pendulum or the
-rays from a searchlight. It may wave like a streamer in the breeze.
-It may move sidewise, as in the long lines of surf that roll up on
-the beach. It may move in countless other manners, as in the handling
-of canes, swords, spears, golf clubs, polo mallets, whips, etc. Now,
-of course, the director ordinarily thinks of a weapon as a weapon,
-and not as a moving line. He studies the characteristic action of an
-officer drawing his sword or of a Hottentot hurling his spear and tries
-to reproduce them faithfully so that no small boy in the audience may
-be able to pick out flaws. This is well, so far as it goes. A painter
-would study these characteristic actions, too, and would suggest them
-with equal faithfulness. But he would do something more. He would place
-every object so carefully in his picture that its line harmonized with
-the four lines of the frame and with all of the other lines, spots, and
-pictorial values in his work.
-
-Now we are beginning to guess how pictorial motions must be composed;
-but first let us see what other kinds of motion there are. If we
-take another look at the geese in the sky we may find that they have
-composed themselves into the form of a “V” or a “Y” floating strangely
-beneath the clouds. This illustrates the third type of motion, the
-moving pattern.
-
-We distinguish between a moving pattern and a moving spot or line,
-because a pattern relates its separate elements to each other. This
-relation may or may not change as the pattern moves. Thus the V-shaped
-pattern formed by the flying geese may become sharper or flatter, or
-one side may be stretched out longer than the other, as the flight
-continues. All fixed pictures are patterns which do not change in form
-while we look at them, and the pictorial principles therein involved
-have been thoroughly discussed in the preceding chapters. But if the
-director wants a pattern to move to the right or left, up or down, away
-from him or toward him, or to change its character gradually, then a
-new problem of composition arises, and the solution of this new problem
-is both inviting and perplexing.
-
-It is inviting because there are so many patterns which gain beauty
-from motion or change. A fixed circle is not so appealing to the eye,
-for example, as a rolling hoop. A wheel standing still is not so
-fascinating as one that rotates, like the wheel of a wind mill, or one
-that rolls, like the wheel of a carriage. Thus also the pattern formed
-by the rectangular shapes of a train standing still does not please
-the eye so much as the harmonious change in that same pattern when the
-train swings by us and winds away into the distance.
-
-The patterns which may be compared with mathematical figures, such as
-circles, squares, triangles, diamond shapes, etc., are not the only
-ones. We are simply mentioning them first to make our analysis clear.
-Every group of two or more visible things, and nearly every visible
-thing in itself, must of necessity be looked upon as a pattern, either
-pleasing or displeasing to the eye. Therefore every motion picture that
-has been, or can be, thrown upon the screen describes a pattern, fixed,
-moving, or changing. If the direction and rate of these motions and
-changes can be controlled, there is hope for beauty on the screen; if
-they cannot be controlled, there is no help but accident.
-
-A peculiar type of visible motion is that which we have elsewhere
-called “moving texture.” Examples in nature are the changing texture of
-falling snow, the stately coiling of clouds, and the majestic weaving
-of ice floes in a river. In the movies the effect of moving texture is
-produced whenever the elements of the subject are so many and so small
-that we view them rather as a surface than as a design or pattern.
-It may be seen, not only in subjects from nature, but also in such
-things as a mob of people or a closely packed herd of cattle viewed
-from a high position. Mr. Griffith has a good eye and taste for the
-composition of moving textures, and has furnished interesting examples
-in nearly all of his larger productions.
-
-Now let us see how far we have gone. We have defined four different
-types of pictorial motion, namely, the moving spot, the moving line,
-the moving pattern, and the moving texture. They may appear singly or
-grouped. For example, in a picture of the old-fashioned water wheel we
-have a combination of the moving line of the stream with the moving
-pattern of the wheel. And in a picture of a small motor boat, seen from
-afar, speeding over a lake the composition contains a moving spot, the
-changing pattern of the wake, and the changing texture of the water.
-If we add to this picture a long train on the bank, trailing a ribbon
-of smoke, an airplane in the sky, and a sailing yacht on the lake, we
-have a subject which is difficult indeed to analyze, and infinitely
-more difficult to compose into pictorial beauty. Yet those are the very
-kinds of motion which a motion picture director must compose in every
-scene that he “shoots.”
-
-But we have not yet completed our analysis of the nature of pictorial
-motion. It has still another property, which we shall call “changing
-tonal value.” Changing tonal value depends upon changes in the amount
-and kind of light which falls upon the subject, and upon changes in
-the surface of the subject itself. For example, the shadow of a cloud
-passing over a landscape gives a slightly different hue to every grove
-or meadow, to every rock or road. To watch these values come and go is
-one of the delights of the nature lover.
-
-Nature’s supreme example of the beauty of changing values may be seen
-in a sunset playing with delicate splendor on sea and sky. And if this
-beauty defies the skill of painters it is because they have no means of
-representing the subtle changes which run through any particular hue as
-the moments pass by.
-
-The beauty of a sunset may long, perhaps forever, elude the
-cinematograph, but this machine can produce tonal changes in black and
-white at the will of the operator by the familiar trick of “fading in”
-and “fading out.” This camera trick is of great service for dramatic
-effects, such as the dissolving of one picture into another; but
-it has a greater power, which has not always been appreciated and
-taken advantage of by directors, the power of producing for the eye a
-pictorial rhythm of tonal intensities. This effect is somewhat like the
-“crescendo” and “diminuendo” in music.
-
-[Illustration: From _The Covered Wagon_. Distinctive rhythm of moving
-lines, interesting changes in pictorial pattern, and harmonious play of
-light and shade are skillfully used in this photoplay to intensify its
-dramatic meaning. See pages 9, 66 and 140.]
-
-When we consider that changing tonal value may be combined with
-changing direction, as well as with changing velocity, of moving spots,
-moving lines, moving patterns, and moving textures, we realize more
-keenly the problems of the cinema composer. His medium is at once
-extremely complex, extremely flexible, and extremely delicate.
-
-But we have not yet revealed all of the strange qualities of the motion
-picture. A unique power of the screen, which can never be utilized
-by any other graphic art, is that which gives motion to things that
-are themselves absolutely at rest and immovable. Even the pyramids of
-Egypt can be invested with apparent motion, so that their sharp lines
-flow constantly into new patterns. It can be done by simply moving the
-camera itself while the film is being exposed. The appeal of apparent
-motion in natural setting is familiar to any one who has ever gazed
-dreamily from the window of a railroad car or from the deck of a yacht
-sailing among islands. Apparent motion on the screen makes a similar
-appeal, which can be enhanced by changing distance and point of view
-and by artistic combination with real motions in the picture.
-
-Still other fresh means of pleasing the eye may be found in the
-altering of natural motions, as by the retarding action of the
-slow-motion camera, which can make a horse float in the air like a
-real Pegasus; or by the cinematographic acceleration of motion which
-can out-rival an Indian conjuror in making a tree rise, blossom, and
-bear fruit while you are watching.
-
-Another peculiar type of pictorial motion, which has never before
-existed, and does not come into being until it is projected upon the
-screen, is the magic motion of the “animated cartoons.” The camera-man
-sees no such marvelous motions. He faces only a stack of drawings. The
-artist who makes the drawings does not see the motions except in his
-own imagination. But the spectator in the theater is delighted to see
-the strangely bewitched men and beasts, birds and trees, rocks and
-streams, weapons and machines, all behaving in impossible ways that no
-maker of fairy tales ever dreamed of. Here is a new field of pictorial
-composition, with distant boundaries and fabulous wealth. Those who
-exploit it will be able to teach many a valuable lesson to the director
-who merely takes photographs of actors in motion.
-
-Nearly all of these motions might be found in a single “shot,” that is,
-in a single section of film. But when these sections of film are joined
-together to form the finished photoplay they produce still another
-kind of motion, a constant shifting from scene to scene. Whether this
-succession is to be a series of collisions or a harmonious flow,
-depends upon those who cut and join the films.
-
-There is finally the total movement which is the product of all of
-these motions working together. A scientist can show you in his
-laboratory that when a cord vibrates in one way it gives forth a
-particular note, and that when the same cord vibrates in another way it
-gives forth a different note. He can also show you that a single cord
-can vibrate in several different ways at the same time. The tones and
-overtones thus produced constitute the peculiar _timbre_, or quality,
-of a musical note. Thus, too, in a motion picture the _ensemble_ of
-all the kinds, directions, and velocities of motion constitutes the
-particular cinematic quality of that particular picture play. Whether
-that resultant quality shall be like a symphony or like the cries of a
-mad-house, depends on the knowledge, the skill, and the inspiration of
-the cinema composer.
-
-Having named the principal motions in a picture we come now to the
-question of how those motions should be composed. When a musical
-composer sits down before his piano he knows that he may strike single
-notes in succession, giving a simple melody, or several notes at the
-same moment, producing a chord, or he may play a melody with one hand
-and a different melody with the other, or he may play a melody with
-one hand and a succession of chords with the other, or he may use both
-hands in playing two successions of chords. Before he is through with
-his composition he will probably have done all of those things.
-
-It is much the same with the cinema composer. Before he has finished
-even a single scene he will probably have produced all of the different
-types of motions in varying directions, with varying velocities, and
-varying intensities. How may he know whether his work is good or bad?
-What are the proofs of beauty in the composition of pictorial motion?
-
-A practical proof is dramatic utility. The motions of a photoplay
-are in the service of the story. They should perform that work well,
-without waste of time and energy. An æsthetic proof is their power to
-stimulate our fancy and to sway our feeling. Pictorial motions should
-play for us, until by the illusion of art we can play with them.
-Another proof is reposefulness. For at the very moment when we are
-stimulated by art we desire to rest in satisfied contemplation. How
-pictorial motions may produce beauty on the screen by being at work, at
-play, and at rest will be told in the following chapters.
-
-
-
-
-CHAPTER VII
-
-PICTORIAL MOTIONS AT WORK
-
-
-All the movement which you see on the screen may be enjoyed, we have
-said, as something which appears beautiful to your eye, regardless of
-its meaning to your mind. But if that movement, beautiful in itself,
-also carries to your mind some significance, if it serves the dramatic
-plot in some positive way, then the picture will be so much the richer.
-Acting, of course, is visible movement that delineates character and
-advances plot. It is pictorial motion at work. And acting, curiously
-enough, is not limited to people and animals. In a sense there may
-be acting also by things, by wagons or trees or brooks or waves or
-water-falls or fountains or flames or smoke or clouds or wind-blown
-garments. The motions of these things also constitute a kind of work in
-the service of the photoplay.
-
-One might say that the artistic efficiency of a motion picture may be
-partly tested in the same way as the practical value of a machine. In
-either case motions are no good unless they help to perform some work.
-“Lost motions” are a waste, and resisting motions are a hindrance. The
-best mechanical combination of motions, then, is that which results in
-the most work with the least expenditure of energy.
-
-Doubtless every one will agree with us that if, while a picture is
-showing, any great work is necessary to “get the story across,” that
-work should be done by the picture and not by the spectators. They want
-the story to be clear, and they want it to be impressive. In other
-words, they want beautiful and significant material presented with the
-fullest emphasis. Emphasis results when the attention of the spectator
-is caught and held by the primary interest in the picture, instead of
-the secondary interest. In paintings, or in “still” pictures, or in
-those parts of moving pictures which are held or remembered as fixed
-moments, a great number of devices may be used separately or together
-to control the attention of the spectator so that the main interest
-gets its full emphasis. Pictorial motions on the screen may also be
-so well organized that they will catch and control the spectator’s
-attention, and will reveal the dynamic vitality of the pictorial
-content.
-
-The simplest principle of accent by motion is so obvious that we are
-almost ashamed to name it. It is this, that if in the whole picture
-everything remains at rest except one thing which moves, that thing
-will attract our attention. Photoplays are full of mistakes which arise
-through the violation of this simple law. In many a scene our attention
-is drawn from the stalwart hero to a candle on the mantlepiece merely
-because its flame happens to flicker; or from the heroine’s sweet face
-to a common bush merely because its leaves happen to quiver in the
-breeze; or from the villain’s steady pistol to a dog’s tail merely
-because the dog happens to wag it.
-
-It is no excuse to say that such motions are natural, or that they
-give local color. For, though a moving trifle may help to give the
-correct atmosphere, it may also at the same time rob the heroine of the
-attention which is rightly due her. For example, in “The Love Light,”
-which was conceived and directed by Frances Marion, there is the
-kitchen of the little Italian home where Angela (Mary Pickford) sits
-down to muse for a while. She occupies the right side of the picture
-while at the left is the fire-place with a brisk fire. The fanciful
-playing of the flames and smoke of that fire catch our attention
-immediately. We guess that this fire-place is not important in the
-story, and we turn our glances upon the heroine, but we cannot keep
-them there because the fire is too interesting.
-
-When the spectator’s reason tries to make him do one thing and his
-natural inclination tempts him to do the opposite, there is confusion
-and waste of mental energy; and during that hesitation of mind the
-opportunity for being impressed by the main interest of the play passes
-by. That rule may sound like a commonplace, but it is not nearly so
-commonplace as the violation of it in the movies.
-
-If the director must have a fire in the fire-place, and if Angela is
-more important than that fire, then, of course, her motions should be
-made more interesting than its motions. It should always be remembered
-that the strangest, least familiar of two motions will attract our
-attention away from the other. The fire is strange, while Angela is
-familiar. In the preceding scenes she has walked, run, romped, laughed,
-cried, talked, and made faces; she has, in short, performed so many
-different kinds of motions that there is almost nothing unexpected left
-for her to do in order to take our eyes away from the fire. She merely
-sits for a long time unnoticed. Presently, however, after the fire has
-lost its novelty for us, she arises, grasps a frying pan, and, using it
-as a mirror, begins to primp. Then at last we look at her.
-
-A more striking case of misplaced emphasis may be found in the
-photoplay “Sherlock Holmes,” directed by Albert Parker. The part of the
-great detective was played by no less a person than John Barrymore, yet
-in the very scene where he makes his first appearance he is totally
-eclipsed by a calico cow. In this scene, represented by the “still”
-opposite this page, we see a beautifully patterned cow swinging into
-the idyllic setting of a side street in Cambridge, following a rhythmic
-path from the background with its dim towers of the university, past
-the honeysuckle-clad walls of “Ye Cheshire Cheese,” and out into
-the shadows of a picturesque tree. This cow holds our attention by
-her photographic contrasts of black and white, and because she and
-her attendant are the only moving things within the whole scope of
-the camera. This inscrutable cow gets the spotlight while the great
-Sherlock is neglected where he reclines drowsily in the shade. Here
-was really the most pictorial scene of the whole photoplay, and the
-annoying thing was that the cow never again showed hoof or horn. Why
-was she ever let in? No suspicion of murder, theft, or other deviltry
-was ever cast upon her. She neither shielded nor shamed any one. She
-did not help to solve any problem. There was no further allusion to
-cattle, dairies, or cheese. There was not even a glass of milk in the
-rest of the play.
-
-[Illustration: A typical bad movie composition from an old film. But
-the pictorial mistakes here illustrated may be seen in some of the most
-recent productions. Intelligent criticism by spectators would soon make
-such careless directing intolerable. See page 75.]
-
-[Illustration: From _Sherlock Holmes_. An example of wrong emphasis.
-The cow attracts attention by her strong marking, the central position,
-and because she is the only moving thing in the picture. But the cow
-should not have been dragged in at all, much less accented. See page
-100.]
-
-Perhaps the innocent cow was an accident. Perhaps the director did
-not know, or had forgotten, that the whitest patch in a picture
-attracts the eye, that an irregular shape, such as the marking of a
-Holstein cow, attracts more attention than the familiar patterning of
-walls, windows, tree trunks, etc., that a moving object in a scene
-where everything else is still attracts and holds attention, and that a
-humble cow emphasized by all these cinematographic means makes more of
-a hit than the most highly paid actor dozing in the shade.
-
-But the strangeness or novelty of a motion may emphasize it, even
-though other motions going on at the same time are larger and stronger.
-In support of this statement the author offers a personal experience
-which came in the nature of a surprise when first seeing Niagara Falls.
-One would think that if a person who had never seen this sight were
-placed suddenly before it, he would gaze spellbound at the awful rush
-of water, and that no other motion could possibly distract him. But
-the author’s attention was first attracted to something else which
-impressed him more deeply, something which moved silently, very slowly
-and very delicately. That strangely attractive thing was the cloud
-of spray that rose steadily from the bottom of the fall, floating
-gently upward past the brink and vanishing continually in the sky. Its
-peculiar appeal lay in its strangeness, not in its strength.
-
-The reader can doubtless recall similar cases where strangeness exerted
-an overpowering appeal. At best that strangeness is much more than
-the satisfaction of curiosity. It is a type of beauty which comes
-as a relief from the common, familiar facts of every-day life. The
-combination of strangeness and beauty has a powerful charm, and he is
-an ideal director who can emphasize dramatic significance with that
-charm.
-
-Violence, at least, is not a virtue in the movies, as so many directors
-seem to believe. Indeed, slowness and slightness may sometimes be
-more impressive than speed and volume. This is often demonstrated on
-the stage of the spoken drama, when, for example, the leading lady
-who speaks slowly and in low tones holds our interest better than her
-attendants who chatter in high pitch. The beauty of her speech is
-emphasized by its contrast with the ugliness of the others. So in the
-photoplay there may be more power in a single slight lowering of the
-eyes or in the firm clenching of a fist than in a storm of waving arms
-and heaving chests.
-
-What has just been said refers to motions in a fixed setting, which
-operate either against or in spite of, each other; but two or more
-motions in a picture may work as a team, and may thus control our
-attention better than if they were operating singly.
-
-First we observe that if a single object is moving along in a
-continuous direction it will pull our attention along in that
-direction, may, indeed, send our attention on ahead of the object.
-Thus if an actor swings his hand dramatically in the direction of a
-door he may carry our glance beyond his hand to the door itself. This
-law of vision works so surely that it can always be depended upon by a
-magician, a highly specialized kind of actor, when he wishes to divert
-the attention of his audience from some part of the stage or of his own
-person where a trick is being prepared. It is not true, as is popularly
-supposed, that we are deceived because “the hand is faster than the
-eye”; it is really because the eye is faster than the hand. In other
-words, our attention outstrips the moving object.
-
-In the movies this law controls our attention to traveling persons,
-vehicles, and things. If horsemen are represented as riding away they
-should be photographed with their backs toward us and with the distance
-between us and them increasing. Then, since our eyes travel beyond the
-riders, we get a stronger impression that the men are really riding far
-away. On the other hand, if the horsemen are coming home, the direction
-of movement should naturally be toward us. This seems clear enough;
-yet directors frequently prevent us from feeling the dramatic intent
-and force of travel, by “shooting” the moving subject from various
-angles in succession. Even Mr. Griffith has been guilty of this sort of
-carelessness. In “The Idol Dancer,” for example, we have a scene (a)
-in which a party of South Sea island villagers are paddling away in a
-large canoe; correctly enough they are moving away from the camera.
-The next scene (b) shows some one raising an alarm in the village by
-beating a drum, which, as we have been informed, can be heard twenty
-miles away. It is a call to the canoe party to return. The scene which
-is then flashed on (c) is a close-up of the canoe coming toward the
-camera. The men are paddling vigorously. We think, of course, that they
-have already heard the alarm and are now returning. But no! Presently
-they stop paddling and listen. They hear the drum. The next picture
-(d), a “long shot,” shows the canoe being maneuvered around, and the
-succeeding pictures all show the men paddling toward the camera.
-
-Now it is perfectly logical for us to infer that the canoe is
-already homeward bound, when we see it coming toward us in scene “c”
-immediately after the drum has sounded the alarm, and we can therefore
-only resent being caught in error and virtually told, two scenes later,
-“This time we won’t fool you, now the canoe, as you see, is really
-turning about.”
-
-If one moving object can send our thoughts ahead to the goal of its
-travel, two or more objects moving toward the same point can send our
-thoughts there with greatly increased force. Thus a picture of two
-ships shown approaching each other on converging courses will surely
-make us think of that region of the sea where they are likely to come
-close aboard each other. If there is an enemy submarine at that point
-and if the two vessels are destroyers, the suspense and emphasis is
-complete.
-
-A similar law of attention may be seen at work in cases where lines
-move along their length to a junction. Suppose we take as a setting a
-western landscape in which two swiftly flowing streams meet and form
-the figure of a “Y.” Suppose now that we desire to place an Indian camp
-in this setting so carefully that it will attract attention as soon as
-the picture is flashed on the screen. We must place it at the junction
-of the two streams, because the eyes of the spectators will naturally
-be drawn to that point. Now suppose that a long white road crosses
-the main stream just below the place where the tributaries meet. The
-position would be emphasized more than ever because the road would
-virtually form two fixed lines leading toward the bridge; and fixed
-lines, as we saw in Chapter IV, also have the power of directing our
-attention to the point where a crossing is made.
-
-Then let us suppose that the Indians build a fire, from which the
-smoke rises in a tall, thin column. That would constitute another line
-of motion. But would it emphasize or weaken the center of interest?
-It would, as a matter of fact, still hold our attention on the camp
-because of the curious law that, no matter in what directions lines
-may move, it is the point which they have in common that attracts our
-attention. Thus if we assume a landscape where there is only a single
-stream, with a camp at the upper end, and with smoke rising from a
-fire, we would still have emphasis on the camp, in spite of the fact
-that the two lines of motion are directed away from it.
-
-The same curious power over our attention may be exercised by moving
-spots. If we see, for example, two ships sailing away on diverging
-courses, we immediately suppose that the ships are sailing out of the
-same port, and, even though we cannot see any sign of that port, our
-minds will search for it. So also in those electric advertisements
-where lines of fire, sprayed from a central source, rise and curve
-over into the various letters of a word, the emphasis is rather on the
-point where the lines originate than on any single letter or on the
-word as a whole. Electric signs, by the way, are surprisingly often
-examples of what not to do with motion if one desires to catch the eye
-and to strike deep into the mind and emotions of the observer. The most
-common mistake, perhaps, is the sign consisting of a word in steady
-light surrounded by a flashing border in which a stream of fire flows
-continuously from dusk till dawn. Our eyes chase madly around with
-this motion and have no chance to rest upon the word for which the
-advertiser is wasting his money.
-
-But, to return to the question of how motions running away from each
-other can throw the spectator’s attention to the point where they
-originate, we can think of no more perfect example in nature than the
-effect which is produced by throwing a pebble into a pool. Ripples
-form themselves immediately into expanding rings which seem to pursue
-each other steadily away from a common center. Yet, despite the
-outward motion of these rings our eyes constantly seek the point from
-which they so mysteriously arise. That this is true every reader has
-experienced for himself. Here then we have discovered a fascinating
-paradox of motion, namely, that a thing may sometimes be caught by
-running away from it. This ought to be good news to many a movie
-director.
-
-But let us see what other means there are of emphasizing a theme or
-some other feature of significant beauty in a photoplay. One method
-is repetition. But what is the effect of repetition? Is it monotony
-or emphasis? Does it dull our senses or sharpen them? There can be
-no doubt that the steady repetition of the sea waves breaking on the
-beach, or of rain drops dripping on our roofs, or of leaves rustling
-in the forest, or of flames leaping in our fire-places can send us
-into the forgetfulness of sleep. But, on the other hand, the periodic
-repetition of a movement in a dance, or of a motif in music, or of a
-refrain in poetry can drive that movement, that motif, or that refrain
-so deeply into our souls that we never forget it. We refer, of course,
-to the higher forms of dancing, music, and poetry; for in the lower
-forms, such as the dancing of savages, the grinding of hand organs, and
-the “sing-song” of uninspired recitations the too frequent repetition
-soon results in monotony.
-
-In the movies of to-day there is, we are glad to observe, very little
-bad repetition except that of close-ups, and even they are now more
-and more eliminated by directors. But there is also very little good
-repetition in the cause of artistic emphasis. The tendency is rather a
-touch and run. Seventy settings are used where seventeen would give us
-a stronger sense of environment. We read more publicity “dope” about a
-woman who can do a hundred “stunts” in five reels than about one who
-can strike a single enthralling pose, and can return to it again and
-again until it becomes as unforgettable as a masterpiece of sculpture.
-
-The photoplay needs repetition, especially because of the fact that
-any pictorial motion or moment must by its very nature vanish while we
-look. Hence, unless all other circumstances are especially favorable
-for emphasis, such a motion or moment may vanish from our minds as
-well as from the screen. To fix these fleeting values is a problem,
-but it can be solved without the danger of monotony if each repetition
-is provided with a variety of approach, or if each repetition is made
-under a variety of circumstances. This is the method in music. A
-particular series of notes is struck and serves for a theme; then the
-melody wanders off into a maze of harmony and returns to the theme,
-only to wander off again into a new harmony and to return from a new
-direction to the same theme. After a while this musical theme, thus
-repeated with a variety of approach, penetrates our souls and remains
-imbedded there long after the performance has ceased. The same method
-is often employed to give emphasis to a particular movement or pose in
-æsthetic dancing.
-
-To show how repetition with variety of approach may operate on the
-screen let us remake in imagination some scenes from Griffith’s “Broken
-Blossoms,” a photoplay which was adapted from Thomas Burke’s short
-story “The Chink and the Child.” The wistful heroine, called simply
-The Girl, played charmingly by Lillian Gish, is shown in the wretched
-hovel of her father, “Battling” Burrows, a prize-fighter. We see her
-against a background of fading and broken walls, a bare table, a couple
-of chairs, a cot, and a stove. If she sits down, stands up, lies down,
-or walks across the room, she moves, of course, through a changing
-pattern of motion against fixed lines. And she ends each movement in
-a different fixed design. Now let us suppose that the most pictorial
-of all these arrested moments is the one which is struck when she
-pauses before an old mirror to gaze sadly at her own pathetic image,
-and that during this moment we see, not only the best arrangement
-of lines, patterns, and tones, and the best phase of all her bodily
-movements, but also the most emotional expression of her tragic
-situation as the slave of her brutal father. Wouldn’t it be a pity if
-this pictorial moment were to occur once only during the play? How much
-more impressive it would be if she paused often before this mirror,
-always striking the same dramatic note. Such a pause would be quite
-natural immediately after she enters the room or when she is about to
-go out, or during her weary shuffling between the stove and the table
-while serving supper, or after she has arisen from a spell of crying
-on the cot and tries to shape her tear-stained face into a smile. In
-all of these cases there would be variety and yet emphasis, always the
-same tonal harmony between her blond hair and the faded wall, always
-the same resemblance between the lines of her ragged dress and those of
-the old furniture, always the same binding of her frail figure into the
-hard pattern of her surroundings, as though she were but a thing to be
-kicked about and broken,--all this shown again and again until the full
-dramatic force and beauty of the pictorial moment is impressed upon the
-spectator.
-
-This kind of repetition can be done much more effectively and with
-less danger of monotony in the photoplay than in the stage play,
-because much of the action which intervenes between the repetitions
-can be eliminated and other scenes can be cut in without breaking the
-continuity of visible motion, while on the stage no bridging of time or
-shifting of scene is feasible without dropping the curtain.
-
-One device which is unique on the screen is the repetition of the
-same “shot” by simply cutting into the film numerous prints from a
-single negative. A well-remembered case was the “Out-of-the-cradle
-endlessly-rocking” theme of Griffith’s “Intolerance,” a picture
-of a young woman rocking a cradle, which was repeated at frequent
-intervals throughout the story. The picture remained the same, but the
-context was ever new; and, if the repetition was not impressive to
-the spectators, the fault was not in the device itself, but rather in
-the fact that there really was no very clear connection between the
-cradle-rocking and intolerance.
-
-Whenever we speak of emphasis in art we are naturally concerned about
-emphasizing that which is vital in the theme or story. We do not,
-for example, emphasize a man’s suspenders in a portrait where the
-main theme is grief. Nor need we, for that matter, emphasize tears;
-for a man might show as much grief with his shoulders as with a wet
-handkerchief. In other words, if the theme is grief we should emphasize
-grief itself rather than any particular gesture of grief.
-
-Similarly if in a romantic story the main theme is dashing sword play,
-it is swordsmanship which should be stressed, and not the sword itself,
-unless, of course, that sword happens to have some magic property.
-Therefore it is bad art in “The Mark of Zorro,” a Douglas Fairbanks
-play, to repeat with every sub-title a conventional sketch of a sword.
-It is bad, not only because the hero’s sword needs no emphasis, but
-because a mere decorative drawing of a sword cannot reinforce the
-significance of the real sword which the hero so gallantly wields.
-
-There is a recurring note, however, in this play which can be
-commended. It is the “Z” shaped mark or wound which Zorro makes with
-his sword. We see it first as an old scar on the cheek of a man whom
-Zorro has reprimanded. Then we see Zorro himself trace the mark on a
-bulletin board from which he tears down a notice. Then we see him cut
-the dreaded “Z” upon the neck of an antagonist. And, finally, we see
-him, some days later, fix his weird mark squarely on the brow of his
-old enemy. And in every case except the first we observe the quick
-zigzag motion of the avenging sword.
-
-Here the emphasis lies in the repetition of a pictorial element
-with some variety of shape and movement and under a variety of
-circumstances. The “mark” of Zorro becomes a sharp symbol which
-inscribes ever anew upon our minds the character of the hero, his
-dashing pursuit and lightning retribution.
-
-Emphasis by repetition in the photoplay may further be achieved in
-ways which we shall not take the time to discuss. Thus an especially
-significant setting may be repeated in various lights and in
-combination with various actions; or some particular action, such as a
-dramatic dance, may be repeated in a variety of settings.
-
-A sure means of emphasis is contrast. We have already shown how this
-principle works in cases where a moving thing is contrasted with other
-things which are at rest. Yet the contrast in such cases works only
-in one direction. That is to say, the contrast throws the attention
-on the motion, but it does not at the same time draw any attention to
-the fixed objects. It will be interesting now to illustrate a sort of
-double-acting contrast which may produce great emphasis in pictures.
-In the well-known case where a tall man stands beside a short one on
-a stage the difference between them is emphasized by the contrast in
-their statures; and when we meet them off the stage we are surprised
-to discover that one is not so tall, and the other not so short, as
-we had been led to believe. In a photograph, for a similar reason, if
-a very black tone is placed sharply along a very white one, each tone
-will make the other seem more intense. And if a painter desires to
-emphasize a color, say red, in his painting he does not need to do so
-by spreading more paint over the first coat. Red may be accented by
-placing green beside it. In fact, each of these two colors can accent
-the other by contrast.
-
-Similarly when two motions occur together the contrast between them
-may be double-acting. When you are setting your watch, for example,
-the minute-hand seems to run faster, and the hour-hand more slowly,
-than is actually true, because of the contrast in their rates of speed.
-This simple law might well be applied in the movies when emphasis of
-motion is required. We would thus get the effect of speed upon the mind
-without the annoyance of speed for the eye.
-
-One does not have to be a critic to realize that there is entirely
-too much speed on the screen. Some of this dizzy swiftness is due to
-imperfect projection or to the worn-out condition of the film; witness
-the flicker and the “rain” of specks and lines. Much of it is due also
-to the fact that the projection is “speeded up” to a faster rate than
-that of the actual performance before the camera. But there is also a
-lamentable straining for effect by many directors who believe that an
-unnaturally fast tempo gives life and sparkle to the action. Perhaps
-some of these directors have not been able to forget a lesson learned
-during their stage experience. In the spoken drama it has long been a
-tradition that actors must speak more rapidly, and must pick up their
-cues more promptly, than people do in real life, in order that the play
-may not seem to drag. But we know that the motion picture is in danger
-of racing rather than dragging. And racing, as we have said, hurts the
-eyes.
-
-The principle of contrast can relieve the eye of a part of its work
-without imposing any additional task upon the mind. Thus some crazy
-Don Quixote may _seem_ to cut and thrust with greater agility than the
-fighting which we actually _see_, provided his action is contrasted
-with the restful poking of his ham-fed servant, Sancho Panza. And thus
-a railroad train which really was running at a moderate speed, might
-_seem_ to dash by on the screen, if it were contrasted with the ambling
-gait of a farmer’s team driven in the same direction along the tracks.
-
-A kind of emphasis which we may classify as contrast is that which
-occurs when movement is suddenly arrested. The unexpected stop not
-only makes the previous motion seem faster than it really was, but it
-also fixes attention more alertly on the thing which has just stopped
-moving. When you bump against a chair in the darkness you are always
-astonished to find that you were dashing along instead of merely
-walking slowly. But the shock has deceived you, for you really were
-walking slowly. If you are out hunting and your setter stops in his
-tracks, your eye is immediately upon him, and will remain so fixed
-until he or something else makes the next move. The same principle
-works on the screen. If an actor, or an animal, or a thing is in motion
-and then unexpectedly pauses, the effect of the pause is to attract
-immediate attention, as well as to make the previous motion seem to
-have been faster than it actually was. Sometimes this law may operate
-to distract our attention from the dramatic interest. If, for example,
-an outdoor scene has been “shot” on a squally day, and the wind has
-abruptly died down for a few moments during the climax of the scene,
-the effect on the screen will be to attract our attention instantly to
-the leaves which have stopped fluttering, or the garments which have
-stopped flapping. We will observe the sudden change in the weather and
-forget the state of the story.
-
-With this argument we ourselves shall pause, in order to summarize the
-principal ways in which pictorial motions, working singly or together,
-can produce the greatest impression on the spectator with the least
-expenditure of his mental energy. Here is the list: A thing in motion
-is normally more emphatic than anything at rest in the same picture.
-Of two motions the one which is the more surprising or fanciful gets
-the chief attention. Slowness or slightness may sometimes by contrast
-be more emphatic than great speed or volume. A moving spot or a
-line flowing along its own length has a tendency to carry attention
-along with, or even ahead of, itself in the direction of movement.
-Two or more movements along well-marked lines, whether converging
-or diverging, focus attention on the point which these lines have
-in common. Lines moving in circles away from a common center hold
-attention on that center. Repetition can work for emphasis without
-monotony, provided it be a repetition with variety of circumstances.
-Contrast between two simultaneous motions or between a motion and
-an abrupt rest may be double-acting, that is, may emphasize in both
-directions.
-
-Our discussion of motions at work in a picture has not been exhaustive.
-The list might easily be made three times as long as it is. But it is
-long enough to illustrate the evil which motions may do if they are
-turned wild on the screen, and the good which they may work if they are
-harnessed by a director who understands these fundamental principles
-of pictorial composition.
-
-However, all work and no play would make any picture dull, but that is
-a subject for another chapter.
-
-
-
-
-CHAPTER VIII
-
-PICTORIAL MOTIONS AT PLAY
-
-
-The average matter-of-fact man thinks that artists concern themselves
-only with copying their subjects, and that their success as artists
-consists in copying correctly. He is satisfied with a painted portrait
-of his wife, provided it is a “speaking likeness,” and he craves no
-other magic of design and color. Such a man praises a photoplay if
-it presents a “rattling good story,” and expects no thrill from the
-cinema composer’s conjuring with shifting patterns and evanescent
-tones. At least he would say something to that effect if you argued the
-matter with him. But he would be mistaken in his self-analysis, for
-even a prosaic person really enjoys the decorative rhythmical quality
-in a picture, though he may not be conscious of doing so. And every
-spectator can get the richest beauty from the screen only when the
-pictorial motions play as well as they work.
-
-What is the difference between play and work? We know that when our
-work most resembles play it is most enjoyable. And we know, too, that
-play, even when it has not been professionalized, often comes very
-near being work. The playing of children, as that of grown-ups, is
-often very highly organized and pursued with a great deal of effort
-and earnestness. Play, however, may be characterized by spontaneity
-and variety. It is not forced, like work, which aims for some definite
-practical result; and it does not have the rigidity and uniformity
-which in work sometimes develops into dullness. If the emphasizing of
-dramatic expression may be called the work of pictorial motions, then
-the spontaneity and variety which accompanies this work may be called
-the play of pictorial motions. And that play is essentially the same as
-rhythm.
-
-We think immediately of two of the elder arts in which rhythm is all
-important--dancing and music. Music leads us to the thought of song,
-and poetry, and oratory, arts which also are dependent on rhythm.
-Dancing suggests sculpture, and sculpture suggests painting, arts
-which would have little beauty without the quality of rhythm. Even
-architecture must have it. From art we turn to nature, and we see the
-poignant beauty of rhythm in cloud and wave, in tree and flower, in
-brook and mountain, in bird and beast. The motion picture, which is the
-mirror of nature, and at the same time the tablet upon which all of the
-elder arts may write their laws, must bring to us the inheritance and
-reflection of rhythm.
-
-This quality has already been discussed in connection with the laws of
-the eye, in Chapter III, and in connection with static composition,
-in Chapter V. We come now to the pictorial problem of weaving the
-individual and combined motions of a photoplay into a totality of
-rhythm. First, let us consider the case of a single moving spot.
-Suppose that we have before us a barren hillside of Mexico, an expanse
-of light gray on the screen. Down that hillside a horseman is to come,
-dark against the gray. If he rides in a single straight line, directly
-toward the camera or obliquely down the hill, his movement will not be
-pleasing to the eye, nor will it seem natural. But if he moves in a
-waving line, a series of reverse curves freely made, the effect on the
-eye of the spectator will be somewhat like that of the “line of beauty”
-discussed in Chapter V.
-
-An important difference, however, between a fixed line and one traced
-by a moving object is that the latter disappears as soon as it is
-drawn. It may linger in our memories, to be sure, yet our eyes can
-trace that line only once, and only in the direction taken by the
-moving object. That is, our physical eye cannot range back and forth
-over the vanished path, as it can over a fixed line. And a still
-greater difference is that the moving object has a rhythm of velocity
-as well as a rhythm of direction. Velocity and direction of movement
-arise and exist together, and consequently their relation to each other
-may produce a new rhythm. The horse, varying his pace according to
-the nature of the ground, may gallop along the level stretches, and
-may pick his way cautiously down the steep declines. There is natural
-harmony in rapid motion over a long smooth line, and slow motion over
-a short jagged one. A simple case like this may help us to answer
-the question, When is the relation between velocity and direction
-harmonious? But we have still the fundamental questions, When is a
-change of direction rhythmical? And, when is a change of velocity
-rhythmical?
-
-We cannot promise to give direct and definite answers to these
-questions; but, recalling our discussion in Chapter V concerning rhythm
-in fixed design, let us say that cinematic rhythm is a peculiar
-alternation of phases or properties of pictorial motion which gives the
-spectator a vivid sense of movement performed with ease and variety.
-
-Now it may seem a vain task to analyze or try to define so delicate
-a thing as rhythm, because all of us can be carried away by rhythm
-without saddling it with a formula. Yet analysis will serve a useful
-purpose if it can help the director to avoid motions which are not
-rhythmical and if it can help the thoughtful spectator to fix the blame
-for the jumble of unrhythmical motions which he now so often sees on
-the screen.
-
-Suppose we make a few tests upon the horseman coming down the hillside.
-If he moves in a perfectly straight line at a perfectly steady pace,
-the action will seem to be a forced, hard effort exerted without
-variety. No rhythm will be there. But if he moves, even without change
-of pace, along a path of flowing curves, we will sense a rhythm of
-direction, providing the horse seems to follow the winding path freely
-and without undue effort.
-
-If, without change of direction, the horse frequently alters his gait
-from a gallop to a walk and back to a gallop again in equal periods of
-time, say half a minute each, it will be apparent that ease and variety
-are utterly absent from the movement. And even if the horse follows
-a winding path and changes gait at such regular intervals the rhythm
-in direction will be neutralized by the lack of rhythm in velocity.
-If, however, there is a progression of varying directions, varying
-gaits, and varying durations of time which appear to be spontaneously
-and easily performed, a progression, moreover, in which both the
-similarities and the differences of the various phases can instantly be
-perceived by the spectator, he will immediately experience the emotion
-of rhythmical movement.
-
-The above example illustrates how a single spot can move rhythmically
-over the area of a picture. A moving line, say a column of soldiers
-on the march, may have still more rhythm. We get a hint of this from
-the “still,” facing page 133. It represents a scene from the Metro
-production of Ibanez’s “Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse,” which was
-directed by Rex Ingram. We see there that the soldiers describe a path
-of alternate curves, instead of the straight lines and square corners
-which a less imaginative director would have ordered. Mr. Ingram has
-further heightened the rhythm by placing gaps here and there in the
-main column, and by introducing a secondary movement in the detachment
-which turns off from the road just before reaching the village. These
-movements are truly pictorial in composition; yet their meaning is none
-the less military and dramatic.
-
-In the scene just described the various motions are similar, and the
-handling of them is therefore comparatively easy. But it is very
-difficult to make a rhythmical combination of motions which differ
-widely in character. In “The Dumb Girl of Portici,” for instance, we
-are shown Pavlowa dancing on the beach, while the stately waves and
-pounding surf of the ocean fill most of the area of the screen. But
-there is no rhythm in the combined movements of that picture. The
-dancer without the sea, or the sea without the dancer, might have been
-perfectly rhythmical. But when we try to view them together in this
-photoplay we get only the strong clash between their movements, and we
-feel no pleasure when shifting our gaze from one to the other.
-
-Perhaps the picture might have been a success if the dancer’s ground
-had been a bank sufficiently high to mask the severe effect of the
-surf, yet permitting a view of the incoming waves, and if the stately
-variety in the movement of the sea had been taken as a key to a
-sympathetic movement of the dancer. We might then get a harmonious,
-alternating flow of the two movements, our eyes might play easily from
-one to the other, and the total pictorial effect might arouse the
-emotion of rhythm.
-
-In a similar way any of the movements of nature, such as the effect of
-wind on cloud, or tree, or field of grain; the fall or flow of water;
-the flight of bird or characteristic movement of beast, movements
-which, once admitted to the scene, cannot easily be controlled,
-might be taken as keys in which to play those movements which can be
-controlled.
-
-Some practical-minded person may suggest that instead of worrying about
-the composition of “unnecessary” motions, it would be better to omit
-them. But such a person overlooks the natural human desire for richness
-in art. We are so constituted that we crave lively emotional activity.
-We love rich variety, and at the same time we enjoy our ease. When we
-listen to the music of a pianist we are not satisfied if he plays with
-only one finger, even though he might thus play the melody correctly,
-because the melody alone is not rich enough. We want that melody
-against all its background of music. We want those musical sounds so
-beautifully related to each other that their harmony may arouse our
-feelings without unduly straining our attention.
-
-A splendid example of secondary motion may be seen in the light
-draperies of a dancer. Even in the elementary movement of a few leaps
-across the stage we see the delicate rhythm of a scarf which is at
-first retarded by the air, then follows the dancer gracefully, and at
-last gently overtakes her.
-
-Between the movements of body and scarf there is a charming play. They
-are pleasantly similar, yet they are pleasantly different. And there
-is a distinct feeling of progression in the various phases of this
-similarity and this difference. As spectators we catch this progression
-without any effort of the intellect and are instantly swept into its
-rhythm.
-
-It would be easy for the director, of course, if the story which he is
-about to film always called for action as graceful as that of a dance.
-But unfortunately his scenario often demands the connecting of actions
-which, pictorially considered, are totally unrelated to each other. Yet
-if the director cares to seek the principles of beauty he will find
-many ways of harmonizing elements that are seemingly in conflict.
-
-One way is simply to impose on each of the discordant elements a
-new value which they may assume in common without losing their own
-distinctive characters. Suppose, for instance, that we must show a
-society lady, with all her soft refinement, on a visit to a foundry,
-with all its sweating roughness. One may fear that there must be
-something repellent between her stately gentility and the bending
-backs of workmen; between her kid-gloved gestures and the flow of
-molten metal. Yet we can blend the whole scene into a single rhythm
-by suffusing all its elements with the warm glow of the furnace and
-by playing over them all the same movement of quivering light and
-shadow. This vibrant, welding beauty which lady and laborer and machine
-may have in common, while still retaining their individual dramatic
-significance, will thus give the touch of art to a motion picture which
-might otherwise be merely a crude photographic record of an incident in
-a story.
-
-Another way of bringing two conflicting motions into a rhythmical
-relation is to place between them a third motion which, by being
-somewhat like either of the other two, bridges the gap and thus
-transforms a sense of fixed opposition into a sense of moving variety.
-It would be somewhat of a shock, for instance, to shift our view
-instantly from the rippling flow of a narrow stream to the wheels and
-levers of a mill. But there would undoubtedly be a sense of continuity,
-and perhaps of rhythm, in shifting from a general view of the stream to
-a view of the water-wheel over which it flows, and thence to the wheels
-of the machinery inside the mill.
-
-This method of interposing a harmonizer might be useful also in
-carrying over the rhythm of motion into the rhythm of fixed forms. Thus
-if we were to throw upon the screen a picture of the gently rolling
-sea, sharply followed by a view of the sweeping horizon of the hills,
-it is most probable that the two kinds of rhythm would not unite to
-draw a single emotional response from the spectator. He would feel only
-the contrast. But if the view of the sea were followed by a view of a
-field of grain, whose wind-driven billows resembled the waves of the
-sea and whose rolling ground resembled the sweep of the hills, then
-the rhythm of the quiet hills themselves might easily seem to be one
-with the rhythm of the restless sea.
-
-As we study the subject of visual rhythm we are led to compare it
-again and again with auditive rhythm, which is best exemplified
-in music. Thus it is easy to see how a given motion in a picture
-might be considered the melody while all the other motions serve as
-accompaniment, and how characteristic motions might be played against
-each other like counterpoint in music. It is easy to see how a whole
-succession of scenes might be considered a single rhythmical totality,
-like a “movement” in a musical composition. And it is certain that
-any director who thought of cinema composition in that sense would
-never permit the slovenly joining which is so familiar in photoplays.
-He would not then allow the shift from one scene to another to be
-essentially a clash of unrelated motions. He would assure himself
-rather that the characteristic types of motion in one scene, their
-directions, velocities, and patterns, played into corresponding factors
-of the next scene, until the entire succession became a symphony of
-motion.[D]
-
- [D] For a further comparison between music and pictorial
- motions see Chapter IV of “The Art of Photoplay Making.”
-
-It is an interesting fact that movement in a photoplay may come from
-other things besides motions. One would get a sense of movement,
-for example, even if every scene in a photoplay were itself a fixed
-picture held for a few seconds on the screen. The various durations
-of these pictures might be in a rhythmical series. The same might be
-said of their dominant tones, and of their characteristic patterns and
-textures. Would the time-lengths 3, 4, 2, 7, 5, be a good succession?
-Or would 3, 7, 4, 5, 2 be better? Which would make a better succession
-of figures? A circle, a triangle, and a cross? Or a cross, a square,
-and a circle? Questions like these are not trivial; neither are they
-over-refined. They and their answers should appear in the catechism of
-every cinema composer.
-
-Speaking of durations of scenes reminds us that in music it is often
-the silences between the notes which vary in length while the notes
-themselves are uniform. This would be true in the case of a simple
-melody played on the piano. The intervals between notes can be observed
-by tapping out the “time” of the piece on a single key of the piano, or
-on a tin pan, for that matter; and the rhythm of time thus represented
-would alone enable a listener to identify any popular piece of music.
-
-At present there are no rests on the screen, no blank periods between
-the scenes. There are, to be sure, moments of relaxation when scenes
-are being “faded out,” and these “fades,” like the dying away of
-musical sounds, have genuine rhythmical movement. But there is not on
-the screen any alternation between stimulus and non-stimulus, as there
-is in music, and as there is also in the performance of a stage play.
-The motion picture, therefore, lacks that source of rhythm which exists
-in musical rests or in the dramatic pauses of stage dialogue.
-
-Whether intervals of non-stimulus could be successfully introduced
-on the screen can be learned only by experiment. Any director who is
-really in earnest about developing the motion picture as art should
-make such an experiment. If he investigates the results of scientific
-tests in psychological laboratories he will learn that under certain
-conditions the normal spectator unconsciously creates rhythm in what
-he sees. It has been shown, for example, that a person looking at a
-small light which is flashed on and off at intervals has a tendency
-to make rhythmic groupings of those flashes, by overestimating or
-underestimating the lengths of the intervals. In other words, if you
-give the beholder’s imagination a chance to function, it will indulge
-in rhythmic play. We believe that if a cinema composer could thus
-produce rhythm by illusion, as well as by actual presentation, his
-achievement would be epoch-making in the movies.
-
-Movement, movement through rich variety, movement accomplished with
-the utmost ease--that is the essence of what we have chosen to call
-the play of pictorial motions. That play, as we have seen in the
-illustrations given, involves every kind of pictorial motion, whether
-of spot, or line, or pattern, or texture, or tone; and every property
-or phase, whether of direction, or rate, or duration; and every
-circumstance, whether in relation to other motions near or remote,
-simultaneous, or successive, or in relation to fixed elements of the
-picture. Any two or three of these things may be treated as a separate
-problem, but it is in the orchestration of all of them together that
-the director may achieve the dominant, distinctive rhythm of his
-photoplay. If he does not aspire to such achievement he is unworthy of
-his profession. If he evades his problems because they are difficult he
-is robbing his trust. If he declares that the world that loves movies
-does not crave beauty on the screen, he is bearing false witness. If
-he believes that the beauty of a photoplay lies wholly in the emotional
-appeal of the performer and in the dramatic action of the plot, he is
-stone blind to art.
-
-So far as the motions in a picture present the actions and reactions
-of the dramatic characters clearly and emphatically, they do faithful
-work; but this work becomes play when it is relieved of its hardness
-and dullness, and is animated with a spontaneity and variety that
-catches up the spectator into a swinging movement of attention. And
-those motions which are both work and play are basic in the beauty of
-cinematic art.
-
-
-
-
-CHAPTER IX
-
-PICTORIAL MOTIONS AT REST
-
-
-That a moving thing may sometimes seem to be at rest is well known by
-any one who has ever spun a top. The top spins itself to sleep. We gaze
-upon it in a peculiar spell of restfulness, which is broken only when
-the top wakes up and begins to wabble.
-
-Now one trouble with the movies is that they often wabble when they
-ought to spin. The motions in the picture too often lack a center of
-balance, a point of rest. All of us have been annoyed by excessive
-motions, jumbling, clashing, on the screen. But many of us have also,
-in lucky moments, been delighted by sudden harmonies on the screen,
-when the pictorial motions, without slowing up in the least, were
-conjured into a strange vital repose. And afterward, when we recalled
-the enthrallment of such moments, we became optimists about the future
-of cinema art.
-
-Surely this is one of the characteristic appealing things about
-a motion picture, that it can show us motions doing the work of
-pictorial expression, indulging in rhythmic play, and yet suggesting
-a dynamic repose. Thus the youngest art can give us in a new way that
-“stimulation and repose” which, psychologists say, is the function of
-all arts. The painter who can suggest movement by means of fixed lines,
-masses, and colors is no more of a magician than the cinema composer
-who can make moving things suggest rest.
-
-Let me propose the following as working theories to explain the effect
-of reposefulness in organized pictorial motions: First, that the
-separate motions are balanced against each other; Second, that the
-significant motions are kept near to a center of rest within the frame
-of the picture, are sometimes even limited to an exceedingly small area
-of the screen; and, Third, that every significant motion is harmonized
-in kind, direction, and tempo with everything else in the picture.
-
-The balancing of pictorial motions does not imply that they must be
-paired off in exact equals. Certainly we do not insist that a dramatic
-scene be so composed that when, for example, a person rises from a
-chair in one part of a room, some other person sits down in a chair
-in the opposite part of the room. Such an effect would be highly
-mechanical, like the teetering of a see-saw; and it is not possible
-for a spectator to get a thrill of beauty while his attention is being
-held down to mechanics. We mean rather to apply the same reasoning to
-pictorial motions which we have in Chapter V applied to fixed lines,
-shapes, and tones. In short, we want to see the values of pictorial
-motions so well distributed over the screen, and so related to each
-other, that they give the impression of being in perfect equilibrium.
-
-Suppose we imagine a cinema scene which contains a waterfall in the
-left half, and nothing in the right half except a dark, uninteresting
-side of a cliff. That composition would be out of balance. And if a
-band of Indians entered the scene from the left and did a war dance
-directly in front of the waterfall, that would throw the composition
-still more out of balance. Or if, at the opening of the scene, the
-Indians appeared dancing in front of the bare cliff, and then gradually
-moved over to a place in front of the waterfall, this cluttering of
-motions would certainly unbalance the picture.
-
-Such cluttering is common on the screen because of the many movie
-directors who either are afraid of simplicity, or lack the skill
-which is necessary to make complexity appear simple. In the scene
-just mentioned the safest course would be to leave out the waterfall,
-however much of a natural wonder it may be, and to let the bare cliff
-serve as the entire background for the Indian dance. But if this
-cannot be done because of the peculiar demands of the plot, then the
-picture might be balanced by introducing some additional motion in
-the right half, say a column of smoke rising from a camp fire. Thus
-even the careful addition of a new element would tend to bring unity
-and restfulness into the arrangement of parts. Just visualize that
-composition, the whitish water falling on one side, and the light gray
-smoke rising on the other, and you will feel a peculiar restful balance
-which could never be obtained by a mechanical pairing of two waterfalls
-or two columns of smoke.
-
-As critics searching for beauty on the screen, we might even carry our
-demand for pictorial balance still farther. In some other picture we
-might demand that there be motions in the upper part of the composition
-to balance those in the lower part. To be sure, we would hardly look
-for such balance in a stage play, or in an ordinary cinema scene where
-the camera “shoots” in a level line, because in ordinary every-day
-life we see more motion near the bottom of our view than anywhere in
-the upper levels. Besides it is natural that weights should be kept
-low; any object is more likely to be in equilibrium when its center of
-gravity is low. But when we are shown a motion picture which has been
-made with the camera pointing downward, so that a level thing, like a
-plain or the surface of the sea, appears standing on end, then we like
-to see the points of interest so distributed that the various parts of
-the screen seem to be proportionally filled. Thus in a motion picture
-of a lake taken from a high cliff we are not pleased to see moving
-objects, boats, swans, etc., only in that area of the picture which
-comes near the lower edge of the frame. We realize instantly that the
-objects are not actually above or below each other in the air. And we
-forget, therefore, that the screen is really in a vertical plane and
-think of it rather as we would of a map lying before us. In fact, if
-there are swans in the near part of the lake view, then the distant
-surface of the lake will not appear to sink back into its proper level
-unless it bears some balancing weight and value, say, two or three
-small boats under sail.
-
-However, even the best of balancing in a separate scene cannot insure
-a balance between that scene and the next one. Directors are often
-tempted to make shots from odd angles, straight up or straight down,
-and to scatter them through a film, showing, for example, a skyscraper
-lying down, or a city street standing on end. But the resulting series
-of scenes does not make a composition pleasing to the eye. It gives the
-effect of wabbling. Even if these oblique views show no moving things
-whatsoever, their combined effect is the opposite of restfulness.
-
-Returning now to the subject of balance in separate scenes, we may
-consider depth, the third dimension of a cinema subject. This dimension
-is usually far greater than either the height or the breadth of that
-space which the camera measures off for us. And it is interesting
-to see what problems the cinema composer has in relating motions
-in the third dimension to those in the other dimensions of the
-picture. He often finds it hard, for instance, to compensate in the
-background for the movements in the foreground, without destroying the
-dramatic emphasis. The usual trouble in the movies is that, when the
-dramatic interest is in the foreground, the motions in the background
-nevertheless draw so much of our attention to that region that the
-picture becomes too heavy in the rear; while, on the other hand, if the
-dramatic interest is in the background, the motions in the foreground
-nevertheless become so heavy that the front of the picture falls into
-our faces.
-
-These are common faults; yet they may be avoided by foresight and
-ingenuity. In the “Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse,” Rex Ingram reveals
-a sure sense of proportion in his control of the marching soldiers.
-If you turn to the “still” of a village scene from this photoplay,
-facing page 133, you will get a suggestion of the equilibrium which is
-obtained for a time, at least, between the motions in various regions
-of the picture.
-
-[Illustration: From _The Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse_. The
-arrangement in this scene has interesting balance between the right and
-left halves of the picture, as well as between the foreground and the
-background, and there is a vigorous rhythm in the moving columns of
-soldiers. See pages 120 and 132.]
-
-Let us say that the foreground of that scene extends from the camera to
-the cavalryman, that the middle ground is that area which is occupied
-by the buildings, and that the background is all the region which
-lies beyond the ruined tower. This picture has many distances, and yet
-they fuse together into a single composition. Equilibrium is maintained
-by the fact that the scattering figures near the fountain weigh against
-the marching soldiers to the left in the foreground, while the two
-sides find a center of balance in the quiet horseman and the three
-persons to whom he is talking. In the middle ground the same care has
-been shown, for the soldiers first swing to their left, past the tower,
-and then execute a balancing movement to their right. In the background
-there is a balance between those forces which are executing a “column
-right” and those which are proceeding down into the village street. And
-if we take the background of the picture as against the foreground,
-we shall find a balancing point in the narrowest part of the street.
-No undue attention is attracted to either side of this point, but the
-whole sweep of interest from front to back, or from back to front, is
-continuous and even. There is plenty of military movement here amid
-evidences of terrific bombardment, and yet, because of the artistic
-composition of the picture, we get from it all a momentary sense of
-repose, as though war itself were at rest.
-
-Several details in this “still” are worth noting. For example, the
-comparatively few figures in the right side of the foreground are given
-additional weight by the whiteness of costume, as against the gray of
-the soldiers. Another interesting thing is the balance between the line
-described by the leading company of soldiers and the line of tree tops
-on the wooded hill, which begins near the upper right hand corner and
-extends to the castle. This relation can be clearly seen by holding the
-“still” upside down.
-
-The reader must keep in mind, of course, that in a “still” the arrested
-motion has not the same weight as the actual motion on the screen, and
-consequently the fixed things get more than their share of weight.
-Therefore in this “still” from “The Four Horsemen” the jagged holes in
-the buildings attract more attention than they do on the screen, where
-the movement of the soldiers and civilians brings the whole composition
-into balance.
-
-When the whole picture is deep, as in the example just discussed,
-it offends us if some of the moving objects come near the camera,
-because this produces two pictures within a single frame, namely, a
-close-up and a long shot. The effect is as bad as that of listening
-to an orchestra so placed that some of the instruments are five feet
-away from our ears while the others are seventy-five feet away. In
-either case there comes a sense of violence instead of restfulness. The
-close-up superposed on the long shot is a common fault in photoplays.
-But we are often annoyed by the opposite fault also, that of jumbling
-two sets of actions which are going on in adjoining areas, one just
-beyond the other. In such a case the director should contrive to make
-the vertical planes seem farther apart than they really are; and it can
-easily be done without cleaving the picture in two.
-
-To prove this let us imagine a cabaret scene containing prominent
-persons of the play sitting at tables near the camera, and a number
-of couples dancing on a floor farther away. In such an arrangement
-it is probable that the diners have more dramatic value than the
-dancers; yet the dancing figures are likely to distract attention
-from those seated at the tables, and thus throw the picture out of
-balance. Mr. Ingram in “The Four Horsemen” had this very problem, and
-he solved it in a very simple and convincing way. He allowed a thick
-haze of cigarette smoke to envelop the dancers till they seemed dim
-and distant. Or, rather, he used the smoke as a transparent curtain
-which separates the diners from the action in the background. Thus
-balance was restored and the spectator could follow the action in the
-foreground without a sense of disturbance.
-
-A separation of planes somewhat similar to this was skilfully effected
-by Allan Dwan in “Sahara.” One of the settings is a luxurious tent in
-the desert. The front of this tent had a wide opening over which hung
-a veil of mosquito netting. Viewed from within the tent, this veil
-became a soft background against which the figures moved, while at the
-same time it served as a thick atmosphere to give dimness and distance
-to the figures which were just outside the tent. By this device, which
-is as natural and unobtrusive as the smoke screen described above,
-Mr. Dwan, besides providing a peculiar pictorial quality of gradated
-tones, kept two sets of figures separate and yet combined them in rich
-restfulness.
-
-When a director is composing a scene in which there is a single moving
-element with a very short path of motion and no strong fixed interests
-to counter-balance it, he should remember that an object tends to
-shift the weight of interest somewhat in advance of its own movement.
-Therefore, a picture will seem to be in better balance if a movement
-begins near one edge and ends near the center, than if it begins at
-the center of the picture and passes out at one side.
-
-This observation regarding the shifting of balance during pictorial
-action raises the question whether it is a practical possibility to
-keep the composition of a cinema scene steadily in equilibrium for
-minute after minute. Since the fixed accents do not change their
-positions and the moving accents do, one might suppose that the scene
-must sooner or later fall out of balance. But this is not necessarily
-so. It is true that if, for example, there is a group of fixed accents
-in the left half of the picture, and a single figure starts from the
-center and passes out of the scene at the right, it would tend, first,
-to over-balance the right side of the picture, and then suddenly to
-leave it without weight. But this tendency may be counter-acted by
-swinging the camera slightly to the left without stopping the exposure.
-Such an expedient would shift all of the fixed accents together, though
-at the cost of introducing a momentary false motion. The ingenious
-director may find other means by which to compensate for the changes
-which must of necessity come about in a cinematic composition. However,
-when it is not possible to have good proportion and balance at more
-than one moment of a changing scene, that moment should be at the
-pictorial climax, the crucial point of that scene, the instant when
-the spectator is to receive the strongest impression, the greatest
-stimulation and yet the most perfect repose.
-
-Equilibrium is reposeful because it is characteristic of a thing at
-rest. To say that another characteristic of a thing at rest is that
-it stays where it is, may sound like an Irish bull; but we say it,
-nevertheless, in order to make another point in our argument that
-pictorial motions may sometimes be in dynamic repose. It is quite
-possible for a pictorial motion to give a sharp impression of power,
-weight, and velocity, and yet stay practically where it first appears
-on the screen. An express train, for example, may be shown in a
-“long shot” starting several hundred yards away from the camera and
-continuing for miles into the distance, and yet the actual moving
-image on the screen might cover an area less than two feet square, and
-might, from beginning to end of the scene, never come near the frame
-of the picture. Thus the train, without losing any of its impressive
-character, would provide a reposeful motion for the eye to gaze upon.
-Surely such an effect would be better than to show the train as a
-close-up on a track at right angles to our line of sight, with the
-locomotive crashing in through the frame at the left of the picture and
-crashing out through the frame at the right.
-
-The reposeful quality of restricted movement on the screen is due
-partly to the fact that the flicker and the eye movement is thus
-reduced, as we have said in Chapter III. In the case just described
-it is due also to the contrast between the slight movement which we
-actually _look at_ and the large movement which we really _perceive and
-feel_. We look at inches and perceive miles. Thus we see very much with
-extreme ease.
-
-We have remarked in preceding chapters that every picture has four
-lines, those of the frame, which the composer must always consider. He
-could, it is true, soften the sharp boundaries of the picture by using
-some masking device with the camera, but this is not usually done.
-The four corners of the frame are always strongly emphasized, because
-of the crossing of lines at right angles. To lead another strong line
-into one of the corners would surely result in undue emphasis and lack
-of balance, because of the power of converging lines. It is almost as
-bad to lead a strong line squarely into the frame between the corners,
-because such a meeting creates two more right angles to attract
-attention. Of course, there may be certain lines in a composition,
-such as the line of the horizon, which cannot stop short of the frame.
-In such a case it is well to have some other strong accent not far
-from the center of the picture in order to keep the attention of the
-beholder within the frame.
-
-What is true of the relation between fixed lines is also true of the
-relation between paths of motion and fixed lines. It is rather annoying
-to watch a continuous movement continually being cut off by the frame;
-and it is especially annoying when one sees that such a composition
-might have been avoided. In a waterfall, for example, the points of
-greatest interest are the curving top and the foaming bottom, and we
-like to see both at the same time and wholly within the frame. A motion
-shown entirely surrounded by things at rest is reposeful on the screen
-as well as in nature. Like a fixed object it stays where it is.
-
-There are certain pictorial motions, however, such as the falling of
-snow, which must always either begin or continue outside of the frame.
-But even when we view such a motion on the screen or in nature we get
-a feeling of repose, because our eyes do not perform any following
-movement; we do not, in watching a snow storm through a window,
-pick out certain flakes and follow them from a height until they
-strike the ground; but rather we keep our line of sight steady upon a
-certain spot while the changing texture slips by. One can get the same
-effect by looking down from a tall building into a crowded street.
-The individuals are no longer thought of as separate moving objects,
-because they weave themselves into a broad band of moving and changing
-texture. Here we get the feeling of restfulness, of motion in repose,
-in contrast to the feeling of restless motion when we ourselves become
-part of that crowd.
-
-A delightful picture in “Barbary Sheep,” directed by Maurice Tourneur,
-is the view of a flock of sheep moving slowly along from left to right.
-The animals are so crowded together that the mass as a whole has a
-textural quality. And yet it is not fixed texture, like that of cloth,
-because some of the sheep move faster and then again more slowly than
-the others, and thus, as in the case of the snow flakes, or the crowd
-in the street, give us a vital stimulus of change within the texture
-itself.
-
-A somewhat similar sense of rest comes from watching those motions
-which arise and vanish within some given area of the screen. A cloud
-of cigarette smoke which floats and coils for a few moments and then
-fades into nothing, bubbles which rise in a pool and break into faint
-ripples that finally die on the glassy surface, the blazing and dimming
-of tones through the photographic device of the “fade-out” and the
-“fade-in”--all changes of this type we sense vividly as movements, and
-yet as movements in delightful repose.
-
-At the beginning of this chapter we mentioned the spinning top as
-an example of motion that had the appearance of being at rest. To a
-certain extent all circular movement presents that appearance and may
-be very pleasing on the screen, providing it does not conflict with
-our desire for fitness and is not allowed to become monotonous. A fly
-wheel whirling may look like a disk at rest, but it is monotonous and
-entirely without artistic stimulation. The action within the ring of
-a circus presents a more stimulating show, and yet it is not quite
-satisfying as an artistic composition of motion, because we cannot help
-feeling that it is not natural, that it is unfit for a horse to turn
-forever within a forty-foot ring. In the æsthetic dance, on the other
-hand, a circling movement can always be of satisfying beauty, full of
-graceful vitality and yet delightfully reposeful, too, because it never
-flies away from its axis fixed within our area of vision.
-
-Now, we cannot recommend that the players of a film story should always
-be shown running around in circles. And yet their separate actions,
-gestures and bodily movements in general, may often be so composed that
-they progress in a circular path, each movement tracing an arc of a
-circle which nowhere touches the frame of the picture. Such circularity
-of motions would give unity, balance, and repose. A good example of
-circularity may be seen in “The Covered Wagon” when the wagon train,
-just before coming to a halt, divides and swings into two large arcs
-of a circle, which slowly contract as the wagons turn inward toward a
-common center.
-
-Another interesting example of circular balance may be seen in “One
-Arabian Night,” a German photoplay directed by Ernst Lubitsch. The
-scene is a court yard, viewed from on high. Looking down we see eight
-or ten servants running inward from all sides to a focal place, where
-they pile up cushions for the hero and heroine. Then they turn and
-run outwards to get more cushions. In a few moments they return, and
-finally they seat themselves in a circle about the central figures.
-Here is a charming combination of pictorial motion with a natural
-dramatic by-play, delighting the eye and lingering long as a pleasant
-motor image in memory. When we analyze this part of the picture we
-discover that the principle of balancing motions has been applied
-perfectly. To begin with, the design is kept in balance because the
-men enter at the same time from opposite directions and approach the
-center at equal speed. Thus, while they are separate figures moving
-over symmetrically arranged courses, they also form a circle which
-gradually contracts about a fixed center. This inward movement of the
-men is itself balanced by the corresponding outward movement when they
-go to get more cushions, which is in turn balanced when they come
-back. Finally this pattern of a circle contracting, expanding, and
-contracting again, harmonizes perfectly with the fixed circle which
-is formed when the men seat themselves. There is a further pleasing
-continuity in the composition when a woman enters the scene and dances
-over a circular path just within the ring formed by the servants.
-
-To the so-called practical business man, whose artistic experience
-consists chiefly in drawing dollar signs, it may sound like sheer folly
-for us spectators to ask a director to spend valuable time in refining
-the art of pictorial motions by some of the methods above suggested.
-The money magnate may not realize that even a slight improvement, a
-delicate touch, may be as important in a picture as in the motor of his
-touring car. Yet he does know, of course, that in the world of industry
-the superiority of one article over another may lie in a secret known
-only to the maker, a secret perhaps never even suspected by the man who
-sells the article. We should be sorry indeed to lose credit with the
-man who can draw dollar signs, because we need his co-operation, and we
-hope, therefore, that he will not long remain blind to the fact that in
-art the superiority of one article over another may lie in a concealed
-design so skilfully wrought that neither the spectator nor the man who
-traffics in the spectator’s pleasure may suspect its presence.
-
-Balanced motions and motions that are limited in area are valuable on
-the screen, we have said, because they can stimulate the spectator
-while giving him the satisfaction of repose. We come now to a third
-characteristic of motions that appear to be at rest, the fact that
-they are in perfect adjustment with everything else around them.
-Perfect adjustment means that all of the moving elements of a pictorial
-composition are at peace with the fixed elements, as well as with each
-other. It means harmony, the supreme quality of every art.
-
-No other art, not even music, contains so great a number of varied
-parts as the motion picture. To fuse all of these parts into a single
-harmonious whole requires knowledge and skill and happy inspiration,
-yet fusion must take place in the cinema composition itself in order
-that the spectator may be spared the annoyance of trying to unify in
-his own mind the ill-adjusted factors on the screen.
-
-The pleasing effect of motions in harmony can be illustrated by
-something with which we are all familiar from childhood, the display of
-sky rockets. The spray of stars, flaming up, burning bright lines in
-the sky, and fading out again into the darkness of night, exhibits a
-perfect harmony of kinds, directions, and rates of motions, as well as
-of changes in brightness. We have explained in Chapter III that things
-moving in similar directions are more pleasing than those crossing in
-opposite directions because they are easier for the eye to follow. And
-it is, of course, true that whatever hurts the eyes will probably not
-seem beautiful. But a picture must please our emotions as well as our
-eyes. We must feel that it is good, that it is in order, that it obeys
-some law of harmony. In the case of the sky rocket we do feel that
-there is unity and not discord, rest and not warfare. Though we may
-not stop to analyze the matter, we feel that at any one moment all of
-the burning elements are in perfect agreement, obeying the same law of
-motion.
-
-Now let us recall some familiar movie subjects, and test them for
-harmony. A common picture is that of a horse and an automobile racing
-side by side. Here there is similarity of direction, but there is no
-similarity of motion. The car glides; the horse bounds. The changing
-pattern which the horse describes with legs and neck and back and tail
-finds no parallel in the moving panel of the car. Besides, we feel
-that there is antagonism between the two. They hate each other. Their
-histories and destinies are different. They are not in harmony. A much
-better subject is a huntsman galloping over the countryside with a
-dog at the horse’s heels. Every action of the one animal is somewhat
-like every corresponding action of the other animal. One might even say
-that the horse is a large kind of dog, while the dog is a small kind
-of horse. And, as they cross the fields in loyalty to the same master,
-their motions harmonize.
-
-There would be unity of a similar kind in a picture of an automobile
-and a railroad train racing on parallel roads. Although they are two
-separate machines, their motions fuse into one thing, which we call a
-race. If the roads are not perfectly parallel but swing slowly away
-from and toward each other again, we get a pleasing rhythm of motions,
-yet, because the directions and speeds are similar, the unity still
-remains.
-
-But if we imagine the train dashing by a farmstead where a Dutch
-windmill sweeps its large arms slowly around, we would feel again a
-lack of unity between the two kinds of motions. The impression upon our
-minds would be confused; it would not be a single impression, because
-the moving objects show two different kinds of patterns, with rates
-of speed that are not sufficiently alike to be grasped as a unity.
-A better picture would be that of an old Dutch mill on the bank of
-a river whose sluggish waters flow wearily by. Perhaps even an old
-steamboat with a large paddle wheel might be so introduced that the
-revolutions and patterns of the two wheels would be similar, while the
-forward thrusts of the boat and the current would also be similar, all
-four movements blending together into a single harmony, like the music
-of four different instruments in an orchestra.
-
-The orchestration of motions is, in fact, the proper work of the cinema
-composer. If he cannot control the objects which move before him, he
-is in as bad a way as the director of an orchestra who cannot make the
-musicians do his bidding. We can sympathize with the movie director,
-because some of the things he wants to bring into a picture are not
-so easily controlled as musicians. One can talk to a fiddler, but one
-cannot waste time talking to a brook or to a Dutch windmill. However,
-if a windmill will not behave itself, it can be dismissed no less
-promptly than a fiddler.
-
-The average photoplay seen in the theaters to-day could undoubtedly
-be improved by retaking it with at least half of the material omitted
-from every scene. The simplicity thus obtained would help to give
-a more unified effect, would be less of a strain on the eyes, and
-would require less effort of the mind. But simplicity is worshiped by
-only a few of our best directors. The average director who is asked
-to film a scene of a country girl in a barnyard, a scene in which
-simplicity itself should predominate, will produce a conglomeration of
-chickens fluttering, ducks waddling, calves frisking, a dog trotting
-back and forth, wagging his tail and snapping his jaws, gooseberry
-bushes shaking in the wind (always the wind), a brook rippling over
-pebbles, and, somewhere in the center of the excitement, the girl
-herself, scattering corn from her basket while her skirts flap fiercely
-about her knees. From such a picture the spectator goes out into the
-comparative quiet of crowded Broadway with a sigh of relief, thankful
-that he does not have to live amid the nerve-wracking scenes of a farm.
-
-When we insist that the motions in a picture should be in harmony with
-each other because of the pictorial restfulness which thus results, we
-do not forget that motions should also be in harmony with the meaning,
-the dramatic action, which the scene contains. Some red-blooded reader
-of this book might possibly have the notion that artistic composition
-of a picture will rob it of its strength. Please may we ask such a
-person to read carefully Chapters II, IV, and VII of this book? We
-have maintained there that good pictorial composition can make any
-movie “punch” harder than ever. Let us illustrate that argument again.
-Suppose we “shoot” two brawny men in a fist fight. The motions of
-the men should have unity, even though their souls might lack it. It
-sounds like a contradiction, but the methods of the men fighting should
-harmonize in motion. If they do not, we cannot enjoy the fight. What
-would you think of a fist fight in which one man had the motions of a
-windmill, and the other had the motions of a chicken?
-
-Many movie directors have had stage experience, either as actors
-or directors, and are instinctively able to harmonize the dramatic
-pantomime of actors or actresses, whenever this pantomime takes place
-in the midst of perfectly quiet surroundings, as is usual in the
-setting of the theater stage. But as soon as these directors take their
-troupe out “on location” they encounter difficulties, because the wind
-nearly always blows costumes, bushes and trees into motion, because
-there are nearly always animals or moving vehicles on the scene, and
-because the “location” is more likely than not to include such things
-as fountains, waterfalls, or sea beaches. They find therefore, that
-the movement of the actors during any one moment of the picture is
-likely to be discounted by the gamboling of a lamb or the breaking of a
-sea wave during the next minute.
-
-The sea and surf possess a perfectly rhythmical motion which one may
-watch for hours without becoming weary. And the effect of that motion
-may well be heightened by composing it with other moving objects so
-that the various motions taken together will harmonize in directions,
-shapes, and velocities. Such composition was very well done in the
-climactic scenes of “The Love Light,” the Mary Pickford play directed
-by Frances Marion, who also wrote the story. Views of the sea breaking
-on the shore are shown time and again throughout the play, but the most
-impressive scenes are near the end where a sailing party lose control
-of their sloop in a storm and are shipwrecked on the shoals. Here
-the principal moving objects partake of the movements of the sea and
-therefore harmonize with it in tempo. The vessel rises and falls with
-the waves. The people above and below decks sway and lurch with the
-same motion. The water which breaks through the hatches and trickles
-down the companionway describes the same shapes and flows with the same
-rate as the water which breaks over and trickles down the rocks. The
-total effect is a single impression of motion in which the separate
-parts parallel and reinforce each other. And this total impression is
-sustained through many scenes, even though the position of the camera
-is often shifted and the subject is viewed from many angles. This
-cinematic climax is a good example for readers to keep in mind when
-they set out through the movie theaters in search of cases where the
-motion of nature has been successfully harmonized with those of other
-motions demanded by the action of the story.
-
-One of the ugliest of pictorial conflicts occurs when false motion
-and real motion are projected together upon the screen. Who has not
-been annoyed by the typical “follow” picture in which a lady is shown
-ascending a flight of stairs, while the stairs themselves (because
-the camera has been swept upward during the exposure) flow swiftly
-downward across the screen? The “follow” or “panoram” picture of moving
-things is usually bad because it falsifies real motion and gives the
-appearance of ugly motion to things which actually are at rest. An
-atrocious picture of a horse race, exhibited not very long ago, had
-been taken by carrying the camera on a motor car which had been kept
-abreast though not steadily abreast, of the horses. The result was
-that the grand stand, guard rails, and all fixed objects flew crazily
-from left to right, and that, because of the irregular swinging of the
-camera, the horses sometimes seemed to drop back together, even though
-they had clearly not slackened their speed.
-
-We have been discussing in the above paragraphs the harmony of
-pictorial motions which occur together at a given moment. They may have
-a harmony like that of musical notes struck in a chord. But pictorial
-motions come in a procession as well as abreast, and these successive
-motions may have a harmony like that which runs through a melody in
-music.
-
-In a stage play it is not difficult to organize simultaneous or
-successive actions so that the total action will produce a single
-effect, because all the movements of human performers are naturally
-very much of the same style. The gestures and postures of a performer
-in any given action are very likely to be followed by similar gestures
-and postures at frequent intervals during the play. Stage directors
-have developed their traditions of unity and harmony through centuries
-of theatrical history. They have learned to preserve, not only the
-“key” of the action, but the “tempo” as well. If they strike a certain
-pace at the beginning of the act or play they will maintain that pace
-with practically no variation to the end.
-
-It would be most desirable if unity of motion could be sustained
-throughout the entire length of a photoplay, as in a stage play or in
-a musical composition. There should be a real continuity of pictures,
-as there is supposed to be “continuity” of actions described in a
-scenario. But such continuity is hard to find on the screen. In “The
-Love Light,” for instance, the film which we have just discussed, there
-is little unity of motion except in the climactic scenes. The very
-action from which the title “The Love Light” is derived, is botched
-in composition. The light is that of a lighthouse and the heroine
-manipulates it so as to throw a signal to her lover. This action
-is shown in a series of cut-backs from a close-up of a girl in the
-lighthouse to a general view of the sea below and to a close-up of the
-hero. But the lantern with its apparatus of prisms makes a cylindrical
-pattern which does not harmonize in shape with the long white pencil of
-the searchlight sweeping the sea. Nor does it harmonize in motion, for
-the simple reason that the sweeping ray moves clock-wise, in spite of
-the fact that the girl rotates the lantern counter-clock-wise.
-
-Two other discrepancies in these scenes may be noted. One is that in
-the close-ups the lantern does not appear to be lighted, and the other
-is that lighthouses do not, as a rule, send out light in pencil-like
-shape.
-
-The scene above cited lacks pictorial unity, in spite of the fact that
-the neighboring scenes are in perfect unity of dramatic meaning. This
-illustrates the dangerous difference between saying things in words
-and saying them in pictures. If we write, for example, “she swings
-the lantern around slowly, etc.,” no reader is likely to question
-whether the lantern is lighted or not, or whether it is rotated in one
-direction or the opposite. But the camera impolitely tells the whole
-truth. And some truths are full of fight when they are brought face to
-face with each other.
-
-The suddenness with which one scene leaps to the next on the screen
-is a factor which many directors and most scenario writers fail to
-reckon with. In Chapter III we have discussed at some length the effect
-which these sudden jumps have upon our eyes. It remains now to see how
-the “flash” from one scene to another affects our minds. In “Barbary
-Sheep,” directed by Maurice Tourneur, there is bad joining which may
-be illustrated by naming a succession of three scenes. They are: (1) A
-picture of a mountain sheep some distance away on the edge of a cliff,
-sharp against the sky, an excellent target for a hunter. (2) The hero
-out hunting. He sees something, aims his gun obliquely upward. Our eyes
-follow the line of the gun toward the upper left-hand corner of the
-frame. (3) Some society ladies in a room.
-
-Perhaps the reader can guess, even from this incomplete description in
-words, how sudden and complete was the shock of scene 3 coming after
-the preparation of scene 2. There was a complete violation of unity of
-meanings, as well as of motions. We cannot say who was to blame for
-this bad art, whether it was the director, or some one in the “cutting
-room.” Possibly some motion picture operator had mutilated the film
-in the theater. The fact remains that this part of the picture as it
-reached the audience was badly composed. The promise of one scene was
-not only ignored but ridiculed in the next scene.
-
-An excellent illustration of how the promise made by a scene can be
-beautifully fulfilled for the eye by a following scene may be found
-in Griffith’s “The Idol Dancer.” Incidentally the joining shows how
-false motion may be harmonized with real motion. Let the reader
-imagine himself looking at a motion picture screen. The setting is a
-New England country road in winter. Into the picture from the lower
-right side of the frame comes a one-horse sleigh, which, as it glides
-along the road, describes a curving motion over the screen, first to
-the left and then upward to the right. It then begins curving to the
-left again, when the scene is suddenly cut. The effect on our eyes at
-this moment is such that we expect a continuation of motion toward
-the left, a completion of the swing. And this is just what we get in
-the next picture, which shows, not the sleigh at all, but the motion
-of the landscape gliding by, from right to left, as the sleigh-riders
-themselves might have seen it. We feel a pleasure of the eye somewhat
-akin to the pleasure of our ears when a musician strikes a note which
-the melody has led us to expect. Griffith’s touch of art in this
-joining is especially delightful because it is so subtle that any
-spectator, though he would surely feel it, would not observe it unless
-he were especially occupied in the analysis of motion on the screen.
-
-Sometimes two scenes may be joined in perfect harmony of motions and
-yet show a conflict of meanings. In “The Love Light,” above mentioned,
-we have one scene where the hero is about to take refuge in the cellar
-beneath the room occupied by the heroine. He raises a trap door, goes
-down the steps, and, as he descends slowly, closes the door behind
-him. This downward-swinging motion of the door is in our eyes when the
-scene is cut, and the next instant we see the outer door of the house
-swinging open suddenly as the heroine rushes out into the yard. The
-motions of the two doors are in perfect unity and balance, but we are
-shocked nevertheless, because, since our minds and eyes were on the
-hero in the cellar, we had expected another view of him beneath the
-trap door.
-
-But there are worse compositions than this in the movie theaters.
-Sometimes whole plays are out of unity from beginning to end. A
-notorious example was a photoplay called “The Birth of a Race,” which
-began with Adam and Eve and ended up with visions of the future,
-touching as it ran such things as little Moses and the Daughter
-of Pharaoh, the slave drivers of Egypt, the exodus of Israel, the
-crucifixion of Christ, the three ships of Columbus, the signing of the
-Declaration of Independence, Lincoln and the Emancipation Proclamation,
-the World War, German spies, steel works in the United States, a strike
-of the workers, etc., etc. All of these scenes were badly joined, but
-the greatest shock of all came when the action jumped in a flash from
-Christ and the two thieves writhing in crucifixion to the three ships
-of Columbus heeling gracefully in a light breeze.
-
-Merely to hint at the contents of such a play is, we hope, sufficient
-criticism. Without harmony of subject matter there certainly can be
-no harmony of treatment. And if the director of “The Birth of a Race”
-offers as his defense that he did not write the story, we can only
-retort that he should not have picturized it. Even when the subject
-matter is in continuous unity it requires a skillful, painstaking,
-sincere director to weave its various materials into a single harmony
-of impressiveness.
-
-Perhaps we have continued long enough the discussion of the many-sided
-nature and the artistic value of pictorial motions at rest. Let us
-simply add that the kind of rest we have in mind is never the rest of
-inaction, of sleep, or of death; it is rather a dynamic repose. Just
-as the still portions of the motion picture may be active upon the
-spectator’s mind, so the motions may be reposeful while they are both
-at work and at play. Such harmony of pictorial motions on the screen
-is not too high an ideal for the lovers of the cinema. The glimpses we
-get of that ideal now are enough to assure us that as time goes on more
-and more directors will be filled with inspiration and will achieve
-triumphant expression through their chosen art.
-
-
-
-
-CHAPTER X
-
-MASTERY IN THE MOVIES
-
-
-Who is the legitimate master in movie making? It is, of course, the
-director, and he should take complete command over the plot action
-of the photoplay, over the players and their accessories, over the
-settings and those who make the settings, over the camera men, over the
-cutters, joiners, and title writers; in short, over all those who are
-co-workers in photoplay making. If this mastery cannot be obtained; if
-writers and players and scene painters will not agree to shed their
-royal purple for the badge of service; if all those who co-operate in
-making a photoplay cannot see that the product must be judged by its
-total effect and not by mere details of performance, then, of course we
-shall never have art upon the screen.
-
-But it is usually very difficult for the director to take and keep
-complete command. Among the first rebels against his authority is
-the writer of the story which is to be filmed. It would be best, of
-course, if the director could originate his own plot, as a painter
-conceives his idea for a painting, or if he could, at least, prepare
-his own scenario as studiously as the painter makes his own preliminary
-sketches for a painting. But, under the present system, these two tasks
-of movie making can only in exceptional cases be performed in detail by
-the same person. The next best thing, then, is for the writer to limit
-himself to the bare subject matter of a picture, that is, the general
-action in which the characters are involved, while the director takes
-the responsibility for the pictorial treatment of this subject matter.
-
-Now comes an interesting question. Which has the more artistic weight
-on the screen, the treatment of the subject, that is the presentation
-of the story pictorially, or the subject as such regardless of its
-presentation? The same question may be asked of any masterpiece of art;
-is it distinctive because of the subject matter or because of what
-the artist has done to that subject matter? In other words, would the
-subject matter remain distinctive even if it were badly treated?
-
-There are sometimes happenings in real life that can hold one’s
-unwavering attention, no matter how poorly presented in language or
-picture. For example, if a panic-stricken idiot were to rush to you
-and say, “It were quick, oh, explosion by Wall Street and lots of
-fellers shut up dead and J. P. Morgan’s windows all over bloody men
-every way,” you would be shocked--not amused--and you would not stop to
-consider the ridiculous language of the report. And if by some strange
-coincidence a camera man had secured a motion picture of that explosion
-in Wall Street, you would be curious to see that picture, and would
-undoubtedly be impressed by it, no matter how ineffective might be its
-photography or pictorial composition.
-
-In fiction there may be certain chains of incidents, such as the action
-of a detective story, which might carry a strong dramatic appeal, even
-though the language of the narrator were crude, confused, obscure,
-weak, and of no beauty appropriate to the thing expressed. “There
-may be,” we say; but all self-respecting writers will agree with us
-that language-proof stories are extremely rare. The story is usually
-impressive because of the telling, and not in spite of it.
-
-In the motion picture, naturally, the telling is not in words, but in
-arrangements of lines and shapes, of tones and textures, of lights and
-shadows, these values being either fixed or changing, and exhibited
-simultaneously or in succession. Whatever arrangement the director
-makes comes directly to us in the theater. Barring accident we see it
-unchanged on the screen, and, as far as we are concerned, it is the
-only treatment which the story has.
-
-It is true, of course, that cinematographic treatment may be vaguely
-suggested by written or spoken words; it may be more definitely
-suggested by drawings; but it can never actually be given either by
-words or drawings. Even the director himself cannot know definitely,
-in advance of the actual rehearsing and taking of the picture, just
-what the composition will be. He may plan in advance, but he does not
-actually compose until the players are on the scene and the camera
-“grinding.” During those moments are created the actual designs which
-become fixed permanently in the film.
-
-Turning from pictures for a moment, let us consider the relation
-between plot and treatment in literary art. It is interesting to study
-Shakespeare’s attitude toward the material which he borrowed for his
-plays. Glance through the introduction and notes of any school text,
-and you will see that the plot which came to his hand ready-made
-was not held sacred. He twisted it, tore out pieces from it, or spun
-it together with other plots similarly altered. And even then the
-altered plot, though an improvement over the raw material, was not a
-masterpiece; it was only a better framework for masterly treatment.
-
-In the art of Shakespeare it is the telling, not the framework, of the
-story that counts. Hence any play of his becomes a poor thing indeed if
-you take away from it the tone-color of his words, the rhythm of his
-lines, the imaginative appeal of his imagery, the stimulating truth in
-his casual comment on character and deed. When a play of Shakespeare is
-filmed, those literary values are lost; it cannot in the nature of the
-motion picture be otherwise.
-
-On the other hand, the distinctive value and particular charm of a
-photoplay lies in its pictorial treatment, in what the director does
-pictorially with the subject in hand. And that distinctive value would
-in turn be lost if some one else attempted to transfer the picture to a
-literary medium.
-
-In view of all this it is surely fair to say that if a writer and a
-picture-maker were to co-operate in producing a piece of literature,
-the writer should be in command; but when they co-operate in producing
-a picture the picture-maker should be in command.
-
-Now when the director is in command of the story, what does he do with
-it? He may permit the incidents to stand in their original order, or he
-may change or omit or add. But in any case he sweeps away the phrases,
-sentences, and paragraphs which describe the places of the action,
-and erects instead real settings, or selects suitable “locations”
-from already existing settings. He marshals forth real human beings
-to perform the parts which are described in words. He divides the
-action into limited periods of time, and decides how to connect these
-periods visually so that the pictorial movement on the screen may be
-a flowing unity. The director, not the writer, does this; and, if he
-were satisfied to do less, he would be only partly a director. His work
-is not the “translation” of literature into motion pictures; it is a
-complete substitution of motion pictures for literature.
-
-When we analyze pictorial composition on the screen we must proceed
-as we have done throughout this book. We must look at it from the
-point of view of the spectator in the theater. The spectator does
-not see the setting with one eye and the actors with the other, he
-does not separate the respective movements of human beings, animals,
-trees, water, fire, etc., as they play before him, and he does not
-disconnect any one scene from the scenes which precede or follow it.
-To him everything on the screen is connected with everything else
-there. The connection may be strong or weak, bad or beautiful, but it
-is nevertheless a connection. This ought to be clear enough to any
-one who gives the matter any thought; yet there are scene designers
-who appear to believe that their setting is a complete work of art
-quite independent of the actors, for whom and with whom it ought to be
-composed, and there are certainly any number of players who look upon
-themselves as stars that dwell apart.
-
-We do not underestimate the individual power of the player as an
-interpreter of the deeds and emotions of dramatic characters.
-Pantomimic acting is one of the most personal of arts, yet the acting
-in a photoplay is a somewhat smaller factor in the total result than
-acting in the stage pantomime; and neither kind of acting can compare
-in importance with acting in the stage play, where the magic of the
-actor’s voice works its spell upon the audience.
-
-In the photoplay the player, whether at rest or in action, is usually
-the emphatic part of the picture; but he is only a part, and the
-relation between that part and the other parts of the picture can best
-be established by the director. If the player attempts to compose the
-picture in which he appears, he is handicapped, not only because he
-cannot see himself, but also because he cannot see any other portion of
-the composition from the same point of view as the ultimate spectator
-who is temporarily represented by the director. He is, in fact, in
-danger of spoiling his own pantomime, of destroying his own power.
-
-The frequent abuse of the close-up, for example, is often due to the
-mistaken idea that an actor’s facial expression is the sole means of
-representing emotion. To think that dramatic pantomime consists of
-making faces is just as foolish as to think that dancing is merely a
-matter of shaking the feet and legs. It is really as important for a
-screen actress to be able to show grief with her elbows or knees as for
-a dancer to have rhythm in her neck. The “star” actress, therefore,
-who insists on several facial close-ups per reel reveals a lack of
-capability in her own art, as well as an over-developed appreciation of
-her own looks. The further objection to the close-up is that it takes
-the player out of the picture. For the moment all the setting, all the
-other players are shut off from sight. It is as though a painter,
-while entertaining a group of friends with a view of a newly finished
-work, were suddenly to cover the whole painting except a single spot,
-and then to say, “Now forget the rest of the picture, and just look at
-this spot. Isn’t it wonderful?”
-
-The player should, of course, always be in perfect union with the rest
-of the picture, yet carrying as much emphasis as the story demands. But
-even when the player wisely desires to remain in the picture, he should
-not be allowed to determine his own position, pose, or movement there.
-He is, after all, only a glorified model with which the artist works.
-
-When an actress moves about in a room, for example, she cannot know
-that to the eye of the camera her nose seems to collide with the corner
-of the mantel-piece, that her neck is pressed out of shape by a bad
-shadow, that her gesture points out some gim-crack of no dramatic
-significance at the moment, that her movement is throwing her out
-of balance with some other movement in the scene, that her walking,
-sitting, or rising appears awkward, in spite of the fact that it feels
-natural and rhythmical to her. These and a thousand other accidents of
-composition can be avoided only by the player’s instant obedience to an
-alert and masterful director who can stop or guide the moving factor in
-the picture as surely as a painter can stop or guide his brush.
-
-When the action takes place out of doors, or in an interior setting
-with considerable depth, the player is still more ignorant of what the
-composition looks like to the eye of the camera. Whether the movement
-of a particular person will harmonize with a swaying willow tree
-and with the shadows playing over the ground, can be discovered only
-by experiments viewed from the angle of the camera. And even then,
-after the action has been carefully planned through a succession of
-rehearsals, it may have to be varied during the actual “shooting.”
-A sudden change of wind or light or an unexpected movement of a dog
-or horse may bring in a new factor that must be instantly taken into
-account.
-
-At the beginning and end of a scene the player should be especially
-pliable under the hands of the director, because the latter alone
-knows what the cinematic connection is to be with the preceding and
-following scenes. The lack of control in this pictorial continuity
-is often evident on the screen. Separate scenes become little dramas
-in themselves, and the whole photoplay is then really a succession
-of acts, with a structure always tending to fall apart, instead of
-cohering firmly into a unity. The peculiar difficulty in the movies is
-that the scenes are not taken in the same order as they are projected
-in the theater. On the screen the scenes shift more quickly than the
-actors could pass from one setting to the next, and yet the actual
-taking of those actions may have been weeks or even months apart. This
-is so because it is more economical to let the particular setting, and
-not the continuity of action, determine the grouping of the “shots.”
-
-Thus, for example, the scenes numbered 9, 22, 25, 41, 98, and 133,
-with a drawing-room as setting, may all be taken on a single day,
-while numbers 8, 40, and 134, with a street as setting, may be taken
-some other day. And still another group of disconnected scenes may be
-taken a month later “on location” hundreds of miles away. This may be
-a fine system of efficiency for the manufacturer, but it often plays
-havoc with pictorial continuity. When an actress goes directly from
-scene 98 to 133, for example, she may be able to remember whether the
-latter scene is supposed to find her still single or already divorced,
-but she cannot be allowed to determine her own positions, pauses, tempo
-and general nature of movement, because that might spoil the transition
-from scene 132, which is not to be “shot” until several days later!
-
-The farther we go into the study of the relation between the player and
-the rest of the motion picture, the more we realize that this relation
-can best be established and controlled by the director, and that the
-player is, in a sense, only a pigment with which the director paints.
-
-“But what of the movie fans?” you ask. “Are they not more interested
-in the performer as a performer than in the play as a play, or in
-the picture as a picture?” Yes, the audience is undoubtedly “crazy
-about the star,” but that is largely because they have not been given
-anything else to be crazy about. It is true that we all admire the
-distinction of individual performers in any kind of entertainment; yet
-we would not approve of a football game, for example, in which the
-“star” half-back made so many brilliant plays that the rest of the
-eleven could not prevent the opposing team from piling up a winning
-score, or of a baseball game which was lost because the batter with
-a world’s record refused to make a “sacrifice hit.” And, besides, a
-distinguished actor or actress may remain distinguished even after
-having submitted to the directing of the master cinema composer,
-just as a figure in a painting may still be fascinating even though the
-painter has made it a thoroughly organic part of the whole composition.
-
-[Illustration: _Portrait of Charles I_, a painting by Van Dyck. The
-composition is characterized by rhythm of tone and line, balance of
-design, and skilful subordination of interests. Many of the principles
-that underlie good painting may be successfully applied in a motion
-picture. See page 80.]
-
-As the figure is really only a part of the motion picture so the
-setting is also only a part, and neither the setting nor the figure
-should be considered sufficient unto itself. One without the other
-is really incomplete; together they can be organized into a unified
-picture. This simple truth, always recognized by painters, has often
-been ignored, both by stage directors and motion picture directors.
-Perhaps the explanation is to be found in the materials with which the
-three different composers work. In a painting both the figure and the
-background are only paint, only representations side by side on a flat
-surface, and therefore easily admit of a perfect fusion of material.
-But in the case of stage drama the situation is different. The stage
-composition does not give us a similar natural blending of actor and
-background. The actor is a real human being, so near the spectators
-that some of them could touch him with their hands, while the
-background is merely an artificial representation of a room, a garden,
-or a cliff. The two elements of the stage picture refuse to mix, and
-the average spectator seems quite content to take them separately. In
-fact, it is not unusual for the audience to “give the scenery a hand”
-long before a single figure has entered to complete the composition.
-
-Now the screen picture is entirely different from the stage picture,
-because on the screen everything we see is photographic representation,
-mere gradations of light and shadow, just as everything on the canvas
-of a painting is paint. In the motion picture without color the
-boundary line of a window or a table is described in exactly the same
-medium as the contour of an actor’s face; and the actor’s complexion
-differs from the wall paper only in being lighter or darker. It should
-be impossible, therefore, to consider that the photoplay setting is a
-complete, independent picture, and that the actors are separate visible
-things merely placed in front of the setting. And if the movie director
-makes the mistake of not fusing actor and setting into a pictorial
-composition, it is perhaps because he imagines the spectator with
-himself in the studio, where the scene and action are like those of the
-stage, instead of putting himself with the spectator before the screen.
-
-But there are signs of awakening in the theater of the stage play. More
-and more the influence of such European masters as Max Reinhardt and
-Gordon Craig is being felt. According to their method of production
-the setting and the actors are interdependent and make a co-operative
-appeal to the eye of the audience. The young designers in the United
-States are beginning to think of the dramatic picture as a whole,
-rather than of the setting as a self-sufficient exhibition of their
-skill in painting. Mr. Lee Simonson, for example, not long ago, in
-commenting on his designs for the Theater Guild’s production of “The
-Faithful,” said that he purposely designed his sets so that they would
-seem top-heavy until the actors entered and filled in the comparatively
-empty zone near the bottom of the stage picture. Without the presence
-of the actor, he declared, one could never say that the set was good
-or bad; one could only say that it was incomplete. Such reasoning
-would do a great deal of good in the movie studios, from which a vast
-amount of silly publicity “dope” has come, announcing that this or
-that photoplay was highly artistic because such-and-such a well-known
-painter had been engaged to design the interior settings. One might
-as well say that a certain art student’s mural decoration was good
-because a famous master had begun the work by painting a background for
-the figures, or that a piece of music was beautiful because a master
-composer had written an accompaniment which somebody else had afterward
-combined with a melody.
-
-In the cinema composition the director must, of course, have mastery
-over the places, as well as over the persons of a film story. He can
-then make the setting a live, active part of the picture instead of
-merely a dead background; he may truly dramatize it.[E] A notable
-example of the perfect blending of dramatic theme, actors, and setting
-is the German photoplay “The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari,” which was first
-shown to the American public in April, 1921. This film, produced by
-the Decla Company, was directed by Mr. Robert Wien, and the scenic
-designs were made by Herman Warm, Walter Reiman, and Walter Rork. When
-the “movie fan” sees the beginning of this photoplay he is startled
-by the strange shapes of places. Houses and rooms are not laid out
-four-square, but look as though they had been built by a cyclone and
-finished up by a thunderstorm. Windows are sick triangles, floors are
-misbehaved surfaces and shadows are streaked with gleaming white.
-Streets writhe as though in distress and the skies are of the inky
-blackness that fills even strong men with foreboding. The people are
-equally bizarre. They resemble cartoons rather than fellow humans, and
-their minds are strangely warped.
-
- [E] The subject of dramatizing a setting is discussed at length
- in Chapter VIII of “The Art of Photoplay Making.”
-
-In the presence of all this the spectator feels that the screen has
-gone mad; yet he does not leave the theater, because his attention
-is chained and his emotions are beginning to surge with a peculiarly
-pleasing unrest. He stays and stares at the remarkable fitness of these
-crazy people in crazy places; for the story is, in fact, a madman’s
-fantasy of crimes committed by a sleep-walker under the hypnotic
-control of a physician who is the head of an insane asylum.
-
-When we examine this photoplay critically we discover, not only that
-the settings are perfectly sympathetic with the action, but that the
-various factors are skillfully organized into an excellent pictorial
-composition. Look, for example, at the “still,” facing page 179, and
-you will observe the uncanny emphasis upon the dark sleep-walker who
-slinks along the wall and a moment later turns upward into the hallway
-on his evil errand to the bed-chamber of the heroine. Place that figure
-in an ordinary village alley and it will lose half its horror; keep it
-out of this weird setting and the place will cry out for some one to
-come into it in pursuit of crime.
-
-Study the plan of the pictorial design and you will see that as soon as
-the man has emerged from the shadows in the background he becomes the
-strongest accent in an area of white. The end of the alley from which
-he comes is accented by the jagged white shape above the shadows, and
-the doorway through which he goes is similarly accented by irregular
-shapes. These two accents keep the composition in balance, and when our
-glance passes from one to the other the path of attention must cross
-the area of central interest. There is rhythm in the composition, too,
-though one would scarcely realize it at first glance. Note the swinging
-curves in the white patch on the street and in the corresponding patch
-on the wall, and note also how some of these curves harmonize with the
-lines of the actor’s body and with his shadow upon the wall.
-
-The “still” which we have just analyzed is typical of the cinema scenes
-throughout “The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari.” Whether the subject is the
-unscrupulous Doctor in his office within the gates of the insane
-asylum, or the unnatural sleep-walker cramped in his cabinet, or the
-innocent girl asleep in a sea of white coverlets, or the gawking
-villagers at the fake shows of the fair, the two factors of person
-and place complete each other in a masterly composition. But that
-composition as a whole was not made either by the actors or by the
-designers of settings; they were happily helpful, but the director was
-the master composer.
-
-Any one who sees “The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari” is likely to remark that
-the settings would not be of much value in any story except the one for
-which they were designed. What a fine compliment to this photoplay as
-art! Perhaps some one long ago in the gray dawn of musical composition
-made a remark that the accompaniment in a certain piece of music
-could hardly serve for another melody than the one for which it was
-composed! At any rate let us hope that in the future the lover of the
-films may not look in vain for weird stories in uncanny haunts, for
-fairy tales in whimsical nooks, for epic dramas in spacious domains,
-for comedies in funny places; and let us hope, too, that he will find
-the compositions so perfect that not a single setting would have any
-artistic value apart from its own story.
-
-“But what of nature?” says some one. “Must the movie director have
-mastery over the works of the Creator, too?” Indeed he must! Because if
-he is an artist he is a creator; and if nature becomes a medium in his
-art, then he must have mastery over that medium insofar as it enters
-the art. Hills have been levelled, streams have been dried up, and
-valleys have been filled with water, all for the welfare or profit of
-man. Mastery of this kind costs money; but are not the movie magnates
-noted for their fearlessness in signing checks?
-
-Wealthy men have been known to build landscapes for their own pleasure;
-there is no very valid reason why they should not build landscapes for
-their own business, especially when that business is an art. The movie
-director of to-day wears out automobiles searching the country for
-“locations” that will do as natural backgrounds for screen stories; and
-in this enthusiasm he is almost as amateurish as the kodak fiend who
-scours the country for good things to snap. The movie director of some
-to-morrow will not look for natural backgrounds; he will make them.
-
-When an artist paints a picture of a natural subject he does not try
-to reproduce exactly the material things which he sees before him. He
-rises far above the craft of the copyist into the divinity of creation.
-His painting is always a personal variation of the natural theme. If
-seven trees suit his composition better than the seventeen which he
-views, he paints only seven, and if there are only five in the grove,
-he creates two more on his canvas. If the waterfall is too high or too
-violent he reshapes it into the ideal one of his vision. This he does,
-not because nature is not beautiful in most of her aspects, but because
-no single one of those aspects fits into the scheme of the new beauty
-which he as an artist is trying to create.
-
-But the cinema composer does not work in so plastic a medium as paint.
-The camera is only a recording machine, working without the power of
-altering what it sees. The subject must be altered by the director
-before the camera man begins “shooting.” On a small scale this is
-perhaps already being done. Bushes, for example, may be cleared out
-from among the trees, and possibly even a tree or two may be chopped
-down in order to facilitate the carrying on of certain dramatic
-actions. We should like to see the ax wielded also in the cause of such
-things as simplicity, or balance, or rhythm in pictorial composition.
-Already bridges are being built especially for certain scenes in
-photoplays. We should like to see the cinema engineers called upon also
-to put an extra bend in the creek, or to make the waterfall only half
-as large, or to shape the bank into a more graceful slope whenever
-any change of that sort might serve to organize the setting more
-harmoniously with the general design of the picture.
-
-Already grass has been mown to suit a director. We should like to see
-grass grown especially for the director. They already make sunshine
-and wind and rain for motion pictures. We should like to see trees
-planted and tended for a dozen or fifty years, if necessary, in order
-to provide a more pictorial natural background for one or a dozen film
-stories.
-
-In thus advocating a new art of cinema landscape gardening we do not
-mean to imply that nature untouched is not full of beauty. We know well
-enough that the rhythm of line in the horizon of a rolling country, or
-in the lights and shadows of trees massed in the distance is often a
-delight to the beholder. But natural beauty of that sort is admissible
-to a cinema composition only when it is itself the dramatic theme of
-the story, and can be emphasized by the introduction of human figures
-or other elements, or when it can be subordinated to something else
-which is the dramatic theme. If nature cannot be thus composed she may
-still be photographed by the maker of scenics, travel pictures, etc.,
-but she is of no practical value to the director of photoplays.
-
-But there is perhaps a question brewing in some reader’s mind. “Would
-it not be ridiculously extravagant,” he asks, “to construct a real
-landscape especially for a photoplay, since you maintain that any
-particular setting, if it is a proper part of a good composition, will
-have little artistic value apart from the particular action for which
-it has been designed?”
-
-Yes, it would certainly be extravagant to spend ten years producing
-a natural setting which could be used only for two days of movie
-“shooting.” But our theories really do not lead to any such conclusion.
-First, any landscape which has been designed especially for cinema
-composition, can be “shot” from fifty or a hundred different points
-of view, and yet can have separate artistic value from every angle.
-And, second, any such landscape would alter itself periodically and
-gradually through seasons and years. And, third, the cinema landscape
-engineer could make considerable alterations again and again without
-destroying the landscape. Thus, even if only a single square mile of
-land were used, it might well serve a film company for a number of
-years; and meanwhile other landscapes would be in the making on other
-square miles of land. However, it is not the critic’s business to enter
-into the ways and means of financing the production of art. He only
-undertakes to express the refined taste of the thoughtful public, the
-public which in the long run it will pay the producers to please.
-
-We desire the director’s mastery in the movies to extend also to that
-phase of pictorial composition which is known as the “cutting and
-joining” of scenes. Bad work in this department of photoplay making is
-something which cannot be counteracted by the most inspired pantomime,
-by the most beautiful setting, or by the most perfect composition in
-the separate scenes. Without careful cutting and joining the photoplay
-can never achieve that dynamic movement, that rhythmical flow which is
-a characteristic and distinguishing quality of the motion picture as
-art. It should be as important for the cinema composer to decide upon
-the progression and transformation of scenes as it is for the poet to
-arrange the order and transitions of his own verses and stanzas, or for
-the musical composer to arrange the movement through the music which he
-writes. Some directors seem to forget that a piece of art can exert
-its power only through that final form which comes in direct contact
-with the appreciator. And many of the others who desire to preserve
-their work intact must gnash their teeth at the thought that no matter
-how carefully they may cut and join a film, it is likely to be marred
-before it reaches the projecting machine.
-
-An example of the amazing lack of artistic co-operation in the movie
-world is furnished by the following press notice, sent out from one
-of the largest moving picture theaters on Broadway. “Audiences who
-see a film projected on the screen at the ---- Theater, seldom take
-the details connected with its showing into consideration. It is a
-well-known fact that a photoplay is seldom presented at the ---- in
-the form it is received from the manufacturer. Every foot of film is
-carefully perused and cuts are made, either for complete elimination or
-for replacement in a more appropriate part of the story.”
-
-Add to such deliberate desecration the havoc wrought by censors and by
-the eliminations caused by fire or breakage and you have a prospect
-of butchery which is bad enough to make any artist drop his work in
-despair. There is no hope for him unless he can organize his photoplay
-so perfectly and make its definite final form so compellingly beautiful
-that even a dull mechanician in a projecting booth would recognize it
-as a sacred thing which must be kept intact as it came from the hands
-of the master.
-
-But a photoplay is often robbed of pictorial continuity long before it
-reaches the exhibitor. The “title-writer,” who frequently combines his
-office with that of “cutter,” is at best, a dangerous collaborator
-on a photoplay. Words in the form of titles, sub-titles, dialogue,
-comments, etc., are rarely in place on the screen. If they are admitted
-for the purpose of telling or explaining a part of the story, they come
-as a slur on the art of the motion picture, and often as an insult to
-the intelligence of the spectator.[F] Nevertheless, the producer finds
-words practically useful as stop-gaps, padding, and general support for
-an ill-directed play that would otherwise have to be scrapped. And even
-the most prominent directors are inclined to lean heavily on words. We
-are doomed, therefore, to endure the hybrid art of reading matter mixed
-with illustrations, at least for many years to come. But we insist that
-this mixture shall be no worse than the director makes it.
-
- [F] Words which appear as an organic part of the action, such
- as writing, print, sign-boards, etc., do not come under the
- general category of “cut-in titles.” For a discussion of
- the dramatic value of words on the screen see Chapter IX of
- “The Art of Photoplay Making.”
-
-After a director has carefully composed a series of scenes so that
-the motions and patterns and textures and tones dissolve, from one
-moment to the next, in a rhythmical flow, regardless of how the story
-may have shifted its setting, we do not want some film doctor to come
-along and break that unity into pieces for the sake of a few jokes, or
-near-jokes, or for a few words of schoolroom wisdom or of sentimental
-gush. We object, not only to the content, the denotation of such
-“titles,” but also to their pictorial appearance.
-
-That written words have pictorial appearance is a fact which most
-of us forgot as soon as we learned to read. We realize that Chinese
-characters or Egyptian hieroglyphics are pictorial, that they are
-drawings; but we forget that the characters and arrangements of our own
-writing and printing are also drawings. Judged as pictures the words
-on the screen are usually too severely white for the background. They
-fairly flash at you. Also the horizontal lines made by the tops and
-bottoms of the letters constitute a sort of grill-work which hardly
-ever blends pictorially with the pattern of the preceding or following
-scene.
-
-As to the design of the letters themselves we find considerable variety
-on the screen, often with no direct reference to the meaning of the
-words or to the picture where they are inserted. Thus the tendency
-to introduce y’s and g’s with magnificent sweeping tails, or capital
-letters in fantastic curves, while revealing a commendable impulse to
-make writing pictorial, often leads to overemphasis, or to a direct
-conflict with other pictorial values in the film.[G]
-
- [G] A neat pictorial touch in the titles of the German play,
- “The Golem,” is the suggestion of Hebrew script in the
- shaping of the letters.
-
-Furthermore, the eye-movement over reading matter should be considered
-with reference to the eye-movement over the adjoining pictures. For
-example, after the title has been shown long enough to allow the normal
-reader to get to the end of the text, his eye may be at a point near
-the lower right corner or at the right side of the frame. Then if the
-following picture does not attract attention at this portion of the
-frame, a slight shock is caused by the necessary jump to a remote point
-of attention. A similar difficulty may arise in connecting a preceding
-picture with the beginning of the title.
-
-Many directors have endeavored to make the title sections of a
-film more pictorial by introducing decorative drawings or paintings
-around the words, and even by introducing miniature motion pictures.
-Decorations in motion, however, are not to be recommended, because they
-distract attention from the words of the title, as has been illustrated
-in the discussion of “The Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse,” on page
-46, and because they do not readily compose with those words to form
-a single picture. It is, in fact, as inartistic to “vision in” motion
-pictures on the background of a title as to “vision in” words on the
-background of a motion picture. In either case you really get two
-pictures within one frame.
-
-Fixed decorations around a title may fill a pictorial need in unifying
-the portions of the film which have been cut apart by the insert. They
-may bridge the gap with a continuity of tone or line or shape, and may
-by their meaning preserve the dramatic mood of the photoplay. But here,
-too, caution must be observed lest the decorations draw attention away
-from the words or fail to compose well with the pictorial character of
-those words.
-
-The problem of words on the screen does not seem very near a solution.
-There will doubtless be a great deal of juggling with titles before
-some magician comes who can “vanish” them completely from the fabric
-of a photoplay. Already photoplays such as “The Old Swimmin’ Hole,”
-directed by Joseph De Grasse and “The Journey’s End,” directed by Hugo
-Ballin, have been successfully produced without sub-titles. Some day,
-we hope, the wordless picture play will no longer be a novelty.
-
-Another factor, which has already become troublesome, is the
-reproduction of color in the motion picture. If the director were
-a genuine colorist, and if he could produce the exact tint or shade
-of hue which the particular composition needs, and if this could be
-projected so that the spectator would really see what the director
-wanted him to see, then the conditions would be ideal for mastery in
-color movies. Such conditions may some day come, but they are not here
-now.
-
-It is possible that the machinery of color photography will become so
-perfect that the spectator may be able to see on the screen the exact
-color values which were found in the subject photographed. But that
-will be only a triumph of science. It will be a scientific achievement
-of the same kind as the correct reproduction of colors in a lithograph
-or color-gravure of a painting. But art lies in the production and
-arrangement, not in the reproduction, of colors.
-
-An elementary study of painting must convince any one that the colors
-which the artist puts on the canvas are really only suggested by the
-model or subject, and that his arrangement of them is inspired by an
-ideal personal conception, rather than a desire to reproduce something
-with absolute accuracy. Therein lies creation and mastery. Hence,
-there is no artistic advantage to a cinema composer in having machines
-which can make a green dress appear green, and a red rose, red, on the
-screen, unless that particular green and that particular red in that
-particular combination really add beauty to the picture.
-
-The “tinted” scenes, usually blue or orange, which are so familiar
-in the movies, are not color photographs, since they are produced by
-immersing an ordinary black and white film in a bath of dye. But from
-an artistic point of view they are better than color photographs.
-In the first place, the value of the tint can be controlled by the
-director, or at least by the person who does the tinting. And in the
-second place, although the lights of the film take the strongest tint,
-the shadows are also affected by it; and the entire picture, therefore,
-gets a tonal unity which is never present in color photography.
-However, even “tinted” scenes should be used with caution, because,
-when they are cut into a film which is elsewhere black and white, they
-break the unity of tonal flow, and usually get far more emphasis than
-their meaning in the story demands. The effect is almost as bad as that
-of the old family photograph which baby sister has improved by touching
-up a single figure with pretty water colors.
-
-Thus we have indicated the many departments and stages of development
-in a photoplay composition, the many pictorial forces which should be
-controlled by a single hand. That single hand holds the reins of many
-powers. And, if those powers cannot be so guided that they pull in the
-same direction, with similar speeds, and with balanced efforts, then
-their combination is disastrous, however elegant and blue-ribboned any
-individual power may be. In the photoplay neither the plot action,
-nor the acting, nor the setting, nor the cutting and joining, nor the
-titles, nor the coloring, nor any other element can be allowed to pull
-in its own wild way. And in any single section of the motion picture
-the fixed design and the movement, the accentuation and the harmony,
-the work and the play, must be co-ordinated and all this technique must
-itself be subordinate to spontaneous enduring inspiration. Without such
-mastery no movie-maker can ever win to the far goal of art.
-
-
-
-
-CHAPTER XI
-
-THE MYSTERIOUS EMOTIONS OF ART
-
-
-The end of all aspiring mastery in the movies is to provide for every
-beholder the thrills of art. These thrills are not like the emotions
-which are aroused by other experiences of life, by sports, for example,
-or adventure, or amusements, or industry, or war. They are stirring
-experiences quite different from those of him who makes a “home
-run” or a “touch-down,” or “loops the loop” in the air, or sinks a
-submarine, or has a play accepted, or discovers a new way of evading
-some obnoxious law. It is true that the dramatic content of a photoplay
-may sometimes seem so real that the beholder forgets where he is and
-responds with such natural feelings as fear and triumph, love and hate,
-pride, selfish desire and hope; but it is also true that the pictorial
-form of a photoplay, that is, the mere arrangement of the substance,
-considered apart from its meaning, can arouse strange, pleasurable
-emotions which are peculiar to the enjoyment of art.
-
-When we recall the masterpieces of painting which have thrilled us we
-must admit that much of their appeal came from other factors besides
-the content of the picture. Think of a portrait of some Dutchman
-painted by Rembrandt. The painting stirs you as the Dutchman himself
-in real life never could have stirred you. You may be impressed by
-the likeness of the portrait, by the engaging character of the person
-portrayed, and by some significant truth expressed in that portrayal.
-But that is not all. You are also stirred by the colors in the
-painting, by the peculiar arrangement of lines and shapes. That emotion
-which you get from the form and medium itself, rather than from the
-subject, is a characteristic art-emotion.
-
-[Illustration: From _The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari_. A remarkable example
-of “stylization” in the movies, showing how setting, figure, and action
-may be harmonized to express the dominant mood of the photoplay. See
-pages 165 and 180.]
-
-We are not now speaking of such qualities as unity, emphasis, balance,
-and rhythm. They are indeed fundamental needs in pictorial composition,
-and yet a photoplay may have all of those qualities without possessing
-any strong appeal as art. A motion picture, like a painting, must
-possess other, more subtle, qualities if it is to make any lasting
-impression upon our souls. What these mysterious qualities really
-are, we do not presume to know. At the same time we believe that a
-discussion of them will be stimulating and helpful both to “movie
-fans” and movie makers. Suppose we endeavor to isolate four of these
-mysterious qualities in art and call them poignancy, appeal to the
-imagination, exquisiteness, and reserve.
-
-Any one who goes frequently to the movies must have felt more than
-once a certain poignancy, a strange fascination in some pictorial
-arrangement, in some curiously appealing movement on the screen.
-Perhaps such a feeling came when you saw a “dissolve” for the first
-time. Perhaps the slow dying away of a scene, even while a new one was
-dawning before you, gave a pang of pleasure never felt before, not even
-in the magic blending of dreams. A “queer feeling” you may have called
-it, and you may have been less aware of it as the novelty wore off in
-later shows. Then it came again when you saw an accelerated motion
-picture which showed a plant growing from seed to blossom within a few
-minutes. And still again you felt it when in some slow-motion picture
-you saw a horse floating through the air. But time went on and the
-frequent repetition of these effects made their appeal less poignant.
-
-In each case the thing that stirred you was due to a novelty of
-mechanics, a trick of cinematography. But you can get that emotion
-without waiting for a new mechanical invention. It may come also
-from the pictorial composition, from some peculiar patternings of
-things, whether fixed or moving, within the picture itself. A striking
-illustration of this may be found in the German photoplay, “The Cabinet
-of Dr. Caligari,” which has been described in the preceding chapter.
-It contains at least two scenes in which extremely simple arrangements
-kindle strange flares of emotion. One of these moments comes in the
-scene which is represented by the “still” shown opposite page 179. Here
-we see Cesare, the hypnotized sleep-walker, slinking along an alley
-of weird lights and shadows. We know from earlier scenes that he is
-bent on committing some new crime. His face is ghastly and his lanky
-frame is tightly clothed in black. He emerges into a bright glare and
-stretches forth his arm in an unhuman gesture, as though he were going
-to glide serpent-wise up the very side of the wall. This movement
-makes a strange pattern and sends through us a flash of--shall we call
-it a sweet shudder or a horrible delight?--something poignant and
-unforgettable.
-
-A similar experience of emotion comes to us a few minutes later in the
-same play when Cesare carries off the heroine from her bedchamber. This
-scene reveals a broad sea of billowy linen, evidently a bed, yet large
-enough for a whole bevy of heroines. Cesare appears outside a window,
-which seems to crumble at his touch. He enters the chamber and, dagger
-in hand, reaches out toward the head of the sleeping lady. We gasp at
-her fate, because we forget that this is only a play. That gasp is an
-expression of pity, a familiar emotion. But a mysterious emotion is
-in store for us. Cesare is spellbound by the lady’s beauty. He drops
-his dagger. Then suddenly he gathers her up, and, holding her against
-the side of his body, starts for the window. As he does so a sudden
-striking pattern is produced by the movement. In his haste Cesare has
-caught up some of the bed linen along with his prey, and this white
-expanse darts after him in a sudden inward-rushing movement from the
-remote corners of the bed. Instantly a strange sensation shoots through
-us. This sharp emotion, both painful and pleasing, is not pity, or
-hate, or fear. It does not relate itself to the villain’s violence
-against an innocent, defenseless girl. It is merely a “queer feeling”
-caused by that striking motion-pattern of the snowy linen whisked
-unexpectedly from the bed.
-
-To one who has been emotionally affected by such things as the
-“dissolve” and retarded motion and the peculiar effects in “Dr.
-Caligari” the above paragraphs may give some idea of what we mean by
-poignancy in composition. It is a real quality tinged with an unreality
-that allies it with the effects which we experience in dreams. Any
-cinema composer who can strike this note of poignancy at least once in
-every photoplay that he produces may justly demand that his work be
-classed with the fine arts.
-
-Another elusive quality, found all too seldom in the movies, is the
-appeal to imagination. Such an appeal may come from things in real
-life or from that life which art reflects; it may come also from the
-artist’s medium and composition. Thus, for example, some people can
-imagine melodious sounds when they look at colors in a painting, and
-nearly every one can imagine colors when listening to music. The
-motion picture’s appeal to the imagination has been treated at some
-length in Chapter VI of “The Art of Photoplay Making,” and we shall,
-therefore, be brief about it here. An illustration may be furnished by
-a sea-shell. We hold it to our ears and hear a low musical sound which
-makes us imagine the surf of the sea, sweetly vague. A similar, yet
-more subtle, delight may come from a picture of some person doing the
-same thing. Such a picture is to be found in the Fox film version of
-Longfellow’s “Evangeline.” Gabriel picks up a sea-shell and holds it to
-his ear. Instantly we imagine the sound which he hears. We also imagine
-the sea which that imagined sound suggests. And, if we are particularly
-sensitive, we may even try to imagine what Gabriel imagines. All this
-is delightful, a genuine emotional response to the art of the screen.
-But we are immediately insulted by an ugly anti-climax. Quick as a
-flash, our fancies are killed by a cut-in picture of a stretch of real
-sea. Now we must look; we may no longer imagine.
-
-The above is a typical example of both imaginative and unimaginative
-treatment in a motion picture. Any reader can go to the movies and
-collect a hundred similar examples in a few evenings. Over and over
-again a director will lead us to the threshold of beautiful fancy, only
-to slam the door of hard realism against our faces. Why is this? Is it
-because the director thinks that audiences are incapable of exercising
-and enjoying their imaginations? Or is it only because he wants to get
-more footage for the film?
-
-As though it were not bad enough to spoil the pictorial beauty of
-cinema composition, many directors proceed to spoil the charm of other
-arts, too. Poetry, for instance, may weave her spells elsewhere,
-but not upon the screen. Even the simplest poetic statement must be
-vulgarized by explanation. “Movie fans” are not considered intelligent
-enough to be trusted with the enjoyment of even such harmless imagery as
-
- “There is a tide in the affairs of men
- Which taken at the turn leads on to fortune.”
-
-During all the three hundred years since those lines were written,
-probably no illustrator of Shakespeare’s plays ever felt called upon
-to draw a picture of that tide, and probably no actor ever strove
-to represent it on the stage by voice or gesture. But in De Mille’s
-photoplay “Male and Female,” where the passage is quoted, the lines
-on the screen must be accompanied by a photograph of surf, which was
-evidently intended to represent the tide!
-
-Shakespeare’s poetic image was thus killed by a single shot. But it
-sometimes takes more ingenuity to destroy a charm. Take, for instance,
-this descriptive line from “Evangeline”:
-
- “When she had passed, it seemed like the ceasing of exquisite music.”
-
-Those words are surely full of emotional, imaginative appeal. Yes, but
-not for the director of the Fox “Evangeline.” He inserts the line as
-a title, then shows Evangeline strolling over a forest path, and then
-“cuts in” a close-up of hands playing across the strings of a gigantic
-harp!
-
-There is nothing mysterious about the emotions of any moderately
-intelligent person who sees things like that on the screen. “Movie
-stuff!” he groans, and wonders “how they have the nerve to get away
-with it.” We have a quarrel with the director, not because he has
-failed to picturize the imagined sweetness of that silence which comes
-when exquisite music has ceased, but because he has considered it
-necessary to picturize anything at all in support of the poet’s words.
-
-This brings us again to the question whether art should strive to
-present any beauty other than that of the subject represented. Was
-he a great artist who, according to an old fable, painted fruit so
-realistically that the birds came to peck at it? And would Michelangelo
-have been a better artist if he had given his marble statues the colors
-of real flesh, or if he had made statues with flesh soft to the touch
-and capable of perspiring on a hot day? We think not.
-
-Art may please through illusion, but never by deception. We get a
-peculiar emotional experience from imagining that Michelangelo’s
-“Moses” is alive with human grandeur, but we should not like to be
-caught in a mob of idiots staring at some more realistically sculptural
-Moses, in the expectation that he was about to make a speech or perform
-a trick. Neither can we go into ecstasies over the fact that the fur
-mantle in some portrait is so skillfully painted that all the women
-want to stroke it.
-
-The depressing thing about many movies is that they are to the ideal
-photoplay what the wax figure of a shop window is to sculpture. Instead
-of dancing lightly through a rich atmosphere of suggestion they are
-anchored heavily with bolts of dollar-marked material. And worse days
-are to come if the “stunt” workers are fed with applause. They promise
-us pictures in natural colors, more natural than any now produced. They
-promise us pictures that have depth so real that the beholder may be
-tempted to take a stroll into them. They promise us pictures that talk,
-and whistle, and chirp, and bark. And perhaps somewhere they are even
-promising pictures that will give off scents.
-
-All these wonders will create industrial activity. They will make good
-advertising, and will doubtless bring crowds to the theaters. But they
-will not bring happiness to those fortunate individuals who can enjoy
-art because it is art, who can get a finer thrill from a painting that
-felicitously suggests interesting trees, than from one which looks so
-much like a real orchard that the birds and bees swarm in through the
-gallery doors.
-
-Let the motion picture look like a motion picture of life, and not
-like life itself. Let the mobilization of characters in a photoplay
-start fancies and stir emotions finer and deeper than any which we
-can experience by observing our neighbors or by reading sensational
-newspapers. Let the lights and shadows on the screen, the lines and
-shapes, the patterns and movements suggest to our imaginations richer
-beauties than those which are actually shown to our eyes. Let the
-motion picture become as romantic as music, and yet remain equally
-consistent with reality and truth.
-
-Thus we have considered two mysterious art-emotions, namely, that
-which is aroused by a peculiar artistic poignancy in the cinema design
-itself, and that which is aroused when the suggestions and associations
-of the design make our own imaginations creative. A third art-emotion
-comes from the conscious or sub-conscious appreciation of something
-exquisite in the finished product.
-
-Exquisite values and exquisite combinations are present in the
-masterpieces of every art. The sweet blending of musical tones which
-leads into a delicacy of overtones that no ear can distinguish; the
-subtle shadings of color in a painting, soft touches of pictorial
-harmony which can be felt more surely than they can be seen; tender
-curves in the most vigorous statue, and marble surfaces surging so
-slightly that their shadows scarcely linger; crisp edges of acanthus
-leaves in a Greek capital and the almost imperceptible swelling of the
-column beneath; the sparkle, the caper and the organ-music of a poem
-you love--these are the exquisite things in art. And there are many
-others less tangible. They thrill you again and again with feelings too
-refined for description in words.
-
-Can the motion picture achieve a similar refinement? Or must it
-always deserve the epithet “crude”? When half of the typical movie’s
-brute strength and snorting speed can be exchanged for tenderness
-and spirituality we shall have a new era in cinema history. That
-era may dawn while the doubters are still slumbering. Even now we
-occasionally see motion pictures which are sparkling without the
-so-called “flashes” of scenes, pictures which flow firmly, one into the
-next, with delicate mingling of tones and patterns, pictures in which
-sometimes the moving elements are as airy as gossamer threads blown by
-a fairy’s breath.
-
-This quality of exquisiteness is something which the director cannot
-produce by taking thought or signing a contract. Other values he may
-develop by study and experiment, but not this one. He may bring balance
-and unity to his pictorial elements; he may accent the interests
-properly; he may succeed in starting a vital rhythm and stimulating the
-beholder’s fancy, all this through determined application of skill; but
-he will need the help of inspiration before he can create the charm
-of exquisiteness. The gods have granted that mysterious help to other
-artists; they will grant it to the cinema composer, too, whenever he
-proves worthy.
-
-There is at least another peculiar art-emotion which the cinema
-composer should be able to arouse. It is the emotion which comes over
-us at the overwhelming discovery that a given masterpiece of art has
-a wealth of beauty that we can never hope to exhaust. That emotion
-is stimulated by the reserve which lies back of all really masterful
-performance in art. We feel it when we have read a poem for the
-twentieth time and know that if we read it again we shall find new
-beauties and deeper meaning. We feel it in a concert hall listening to
-a symphony that has been played for us repeatedly since childhood and
-yet reveals fresh beauties to our maturing powers of appreciation. We
-feel it in the mystic dimness of some cathedral beneath whose arches
-a score of generations have prayed and the most eloquent disbeliever
-of today stands gaping in silence. Behind the human power which wrote
-the poem, or composed the music, or built the cathedral lies a vast
-reserve; and, though it was not drawn upon, we seem to glimpse that
-reserve forever in the finished masterpiece.
-
-Has any reader of this book gone to see the same photoplay ten times?
-And if so, why? Was it because of some irresistible, undying lure in
-the content of that photoplay or in the pictorial form of that content?
-Did you go of your own free will? Did you even make a sacrifice to see
-it the tenth time? If so, then you have known the calm joy of a reserve
-power in the newest of the arts.
-
-Unfortunately reserve is not characteristic of the movies. It is seldom
-indeed that a photoplay contains anything of value that cannot be
-caught during the first showing. In fact, it happens rather frequently
-that a photoplay uses up every ounce of its own proper power and then
-is forced to call in the help of something known as “padding” before it
-measures up to the commercial fullness of five reels, or whatever the
-contract stipulates. If you poke around through this padding, you will
-find that it is usually made up of innocent kittens, ducklings, calves,
-human babies, and other “ain’t-it-cunnin’” stuff, which may arouse
-emotions, to be sure, but not the emotions which make up the enjoyment
-of art as art.
-
-Another typical lack of reserve is illustrated in the building and
-decoration of settings. Avalanches of furniture are apparently
-necessary to show that a character is well-to-do. The heroine’s boudoir
-must look like a gift shop, and her dressing table like a drug store
-counter, in order to convince the audience that she spends a few sacred
-moments of the day attending to her finger nails. Walls of rooms must
-be paneled off by scores of framed pictures, mirrors, etc., so that,
-no matter where the actor stands, his head will be strikingly set off
-by some ornamental frame. Floors must look partly like an Oriental
-bazaar and partly like a fur market. Chairs, tables, cabinets, beds,
-and what-nots, must carry our minds to Versailles and the Bronx,
-to Buckingham Palace, and Hollywood. Hangings of plush and silk,
-tapestries of cloth of gold, curtains of lace or batiked silk, cords of
-intricate plaiting, must flow from the heights, waving in the breeze to
-prove that they are real. All this extravagance must be, we presume, in
-order to show that the heroine lives on an income and not a salary, and
-in order to give the brides in the audience new ideas for mortgaging
-their husbands’ futures at the installment-plan stores.
-
-With such extravagance of materials in a picture there can be no
-simplicity or reserve in the pictorial composition, if indeed there can
-be any composition at all. Whatever design the director gives to the
-miscellaneous lines and shapes will seem rather like a last despairing
-effort than the easy, happy touch of a master’s hand.
-
-The hysterical extravagance of the movies is further illustrated in
-the breathless speed which so often characterizes every moving thing
-on the screen. We feel that, at the end of the road, horses must
-expire from exhaustion and automobiles must catch fire from excessive
-friction. Clouds are driven by hurricanes, rivers shoot, trees snap,
-and the most dignified gentleman dog-trots. It is true that some of
-this breathlessness carries with it a certain thrill for the spectator,
-but that thrill is by no means to be classed as an æsthetic emotion. It
-has nothing of that abiding joy which comes from the consciousness of
-restrained energy in art.
-
-Much of this feverish activity, this “jazz” of the screen, is due to
-rapidity of projection; and yet the director is responsible, for he
-certainly knows the probable rate of projection and can control his
-composition accordingly by retarding actions or by selecting slower
-actions in place of those which cannot be retarded. Slowness of
-movement, where it is not unnatural, is pleasant to the eye, as we
-have said in preceding chapters, but it has a peculiar appeal for the
-emotions, too. It fills us with a sense of the majesty that none can
-shake, of the deep currents that none can turn aside.
-
-How to produce a picture that shall impress an audience with its
-inexhaustible reserve is a secret that remains with him who has the
-power. So, too, with the other pictorial qualities discussed in this
-chapter. We know of no formulas by which the mysterious art-emotions
-can be aroused. Yet if directors and spectators alike ponder over these
-mysteries, it will surely help them to separate the gold from the dross.
-
-Let us vision an ideal photoplay. It is entrancing, yet restful, to
-the eye. Its composition is both vigorous and graceful, as harmonious
-as music. Our sympathies are stirred warmly by the experiences of
-the persons in the story. We are held in keen suspense as to the
-dramatic outcome. And we get also the more subtle art-emotions.
-Our souls are shot through by the poignancy of fixed and flowing
-designs. We are fascinated by these designs at the same time that our
-fancies pass through and beyond them. The visible work of the artist
-is only a mesh-work through which our imaginations are whirled away
-into rapturous regions of experiences unlived and unexpressed. Such
-transports may be brief, yet they are measureless in their flights.
-Our attention swings back from these far flights into a quiet response
-to the delicacy of arrangement of line and shape, of texture and tone,
-of blending and weaving and vanishing values. We feel an exquisiteness
-too fine for understanding, which tapers away at last until it is too
-fine for the most sensitive feeling. And during all the while that we
-are rapt by the poignancy, the imagination, the exquisiteness of the
-master’s production, we feel that a rich reserve lies beyond our grasp
-or touch. We cannot quite soar to the master’s heights, or plumb his
-depths, or separate the airy fibers of his weaving.
-
-Yet, when such beauty comes to the screen, who shall say that it is a
-miracle, that the manner of its coming is above every law and beyond
-all conjecture? And who shall say that the hour of its coming has not
-been hastened by the million spectators whose judgments have been
-whetted and whose sympathies have been deepened by taking thought about
-the nature of art?
-
-
-
-
-Transcriber’s Notes
-
-
-Punctuation, hyphenation, and spelling were made consistent when a
-predominant preference was found in the original book; otherwise they
-were not changed.
-
-Simple typographical errors were corrected; unbalanced quotation
-marks were remedied when the change was obvious, and otherwise left
-unbalanced.
-
-Illustrations in this eBook have been positioned between paragraphs
-and outside quotations. In versions of this eBook that support
-hyperlinks, the page references in the List of Illustrations lead to
-the corresponding illustrations.
-
-Page 14: “propellors” was printed that way.
-
-Page 120: “Pavlowa” was printed that way.
-
-*** END OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK PICTORIAL BEAUTY ON THE
-SCREEN ***
-
-Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions will
-be renamed.
-
-Creating the works from print editions not protected by U.S. copyright
-law means that no one owns a United States copyright in these works,
-so the Foundation (and you!) can copy and distribute it in the
-United States without permission and without paying copyright
-royalties. Special rules, set forth in the General Terms of Use part
-of this license, apply to copying and distributing Project
-Gutenberg-tm electronic works to protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm
-concept and trademark. Project Gutenberg is a registered trademark,
-and may not be used if you charge for an eBook, except by following
-the terms of the trademark license, including paying royalties for use
-of the Project Gutenberg trademark. If you do not charge anything for
-copies of this eBook, complying with the trademark license is very
-easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose such as creation
-of derivative works, reports, performances and research. Project
-Gutenberg eBooks may be modified and printed and given away--you may
-do practically ANYTHING in the United States with eBooks not protected
-by U.S. copyright law. Redistribution is subject to the trademark
-license, especially commercial redistribution.
-
-START: FULL LICENSE
-
-THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE
-PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK
-
-To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free
-distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work
-(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project
-Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full
-Project Gutenberg-tm License available with this file or online at
-www.gutenberg.org/license.
-
-Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project
-Gutenberg-tm electronic works
-
-1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm
-electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to
-and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property
-(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all
-the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or
-destroy all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your
-possession. If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a
-Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound
-by the terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the
-person or entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph
-1.E.8.
-
-1.B. "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark. It may only be
-used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who
-agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few
-things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works
-even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See
-paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project
-Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this
-agreement and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm
-electronic works. See paragraph 1.E below.
-
-1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the
-Foundation" or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection
-of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works. Nearly all the individual
-works in the collection are in the public domain in the United
-States. If an individual work is unprotected by copyright law in the
-United States and you are located in the United States, we do not
-claim a right to prevent you from copying, distributing, performing,
-displaying or creating derivative works based on the work as long as
-all references to Project Gutenberg are removed. Of course, we hope
-that you will support the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting
-free access to electronic works by freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm
-works in compliance with the terms of this agreement for keeping the
-Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with the work. You can easily
-comply with the terms of this agreement by keeping this work in the
-same format with its attached full Project Gutenberg-tm License when
-you share it without charge with others.
-
-1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern
-what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are
-in a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States,
-check the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this
-agreement before downloading, copying, displaying, performing,
-distributing or creating derivative works based on this work or any
-other Project Gutenberg-tm work. The Foundation makes no
-representations concerning the copyright status of any work in any
-country other than the United States.
-
-1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg:
-
-1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other
-immediate access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear
-prominently whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work
-on which the phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the
-phrase "Project Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed,
-performed, viewed, copied or distributed:
-
- This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States and
- most other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no
- restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it
- under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included with this
- eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org. If you are not located in the
- United States, you will have to check the laws of the country where
- you are located before using this eBook.
-
-1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is
-derived from texts not protected by U.S. copyright law (does not
-contain a notice indicating that it is posted with permission of the
-copyright holder), the work can be copied and distributed to anyone in
-the United States without paying any fees or charges. If you are
-redistributing or providing access to a work with the phrase "Project
-Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the work, you must comply
-either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 or
-obtain permission for the use of the work and the Project Gutenberg-tm
-trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.
-
-1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted
-with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution
-must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any
-additional terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms
-will be linked to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works
-posted with the permission of the copyright holder found at the
-beginning of this work.
-
-1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm
-License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this
-work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm.
-
-1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this
-electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without
-prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with
-active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project
-Gutenberg-tm License.
-
-1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary,
-compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including
-any word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access
-to or distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format
-other than "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official
-version posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm website
-(www.gutenberg.org), you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense
-to the user, provide a copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means
-of obtaining a copy upon request, of the work in its original "Plain
-Vanilla ASCII" or other form. Any alternate format must include the
-full Project Gutenberg-tm License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1.
-
-1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying,
-performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works
-unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.
-
-1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing
-access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works
-provided that:
-
-* You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from
- the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method
- you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is owed
- to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he has
- agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the Project
- Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments must be paid
- within 60 days following each date on which you prepare (or are
- legally required to prepare) your periodic tax returns. Royalty
- payments should be clearly marked as such and sent to the Project
- Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the address specified in
- Section 4, "Information about donations to the Project Gutenberg
- Literary Archive Foundation."
-
-* You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies
- you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he
- does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm
- License. You must require such a user to return or destroy all
- copies of the works possessed in a physical medium and discontinue
- all use of and all access to other copies of Project Gutenberg-tm
- works.
-
-* You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of
- any money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the
- electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days of
- receipt of the work.
-
-* You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
- distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works.
-
-1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project
-Gutenberg-tm electronic work or group of works on different terms than
-are set forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing
-from the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the manager of
-the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark. Contact the Foundation as set
-forth in Section 3 below.
-
-1.F.
-
-1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable
-effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread
-works not protected by U.S. copyright law in creating the Project
-Gutenberg-tm collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm
-electronic works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may
-contain "Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate
-or corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other
-intellectual property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or
-other medium, a computer virus, or computer codes that damage or
-cannot be read by your equipment.
-
-1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right
-of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project
-Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project
-Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project
-Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all
-liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal
-fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT
-LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE
-PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE
-TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE
-LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR
-INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH
-DAMAGE.
-
-1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a
-defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can
-receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a
-written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you
-received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium
-with your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you
-with the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in
-lieu of a refund. If you received the work electronically, the person
-or entity providing it to you may choose to give you a second
-opportunity to receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If
-the second copy is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing
-without further opportunities to fix the problem.
-
-1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth
-in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS', WITH NO
-OTHER WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT
-LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.
-
-1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied
-warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of
-damages. If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement
-violates the law of the state applicable to this agreement, the
-agreement shall be interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or
-limitation permitted by the applicable state law. The invalidity or
-unenforceability of any provision of this agreement shall not void the
-remaining provisions.
-
-1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the
-trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone
-providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in
-accordance with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the
-production, promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm
-electronic works, harmless from all liability, costs and expenses,
-including legal fees, that arise directly or indirectly from any of
-the following which you do or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this
-or any Project Gutenberg-tm work, (b) alteration, modification, or
-additions or deletions to any Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any
-Defect you cause.
-
-Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm
-
-Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of
-electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of
-computers including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It
-exists because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations
-from people in all walks of life.
-
-Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the
-assistance they need are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's
-goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will
-remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project
-Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure
-and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future
-generations. To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary
-Archive Foundation and how your efforts and donations can help, see
-Sections 3 and 4 and the Foundation information page at
-www.gutenberg.org
-
-Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary
-Archive Foundation
-
-The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non-profit
-501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the
-state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal
-Revenue Service. The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification
-number is 64-6221541. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg Literary
-Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent permitted by
-U.S. federal laws and your state's laws.
-
-The Foundation's business office is located at 809 North 1500 West,
-Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887. Email contact links and up
-to date contact information can be found at the Foundation's website
-and official page at www.gutenberg.org/contact
-
-Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg
-Literary Archive Foundation
-
-Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without
-widespread public support and donations to carry out its mission of
-increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be
-freely distributed in machine-readable form accessible by the widest
-array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations
-($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt
-status with the IRS.
-
-The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating
-charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United
-States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a
-considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up
-with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations
-where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To SEND
-DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any particular
-state visit www.gutenberg.org/donate
-
-While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we
-have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition
-against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who
-approach us with offers to donate.
-
-International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make
-any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from
-outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff.
-
-Please check the Project Gutenberg web pages for current donation
-methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other
-ways including checks, online payments and credit card donations. To
-donate, please visit: www.gutenberg.org/donate
-
-Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works
-
-Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project
-Gutenberg-tm concept of a library of electronic works that could be
-freely shared with anyone. For forty years, he produced and
-distributed Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of
-volunteer support.
-
-Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed
-editions, all of which are confirmed as not protected by copyright in
-the U.S. unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not
-necessarily keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper
-edition.
-
-Most people start at our website which has the main PG search
-facility: www.gutenberg.org
-
-This website includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm,
-including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary
-Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to
-subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks.
diff --git a/old/66049-0.zip b/old/66049-0.zip
deleted file mode 100644
index 798be96..0000000
--- a/old/66049-0.zip
+++ /dev/null
Binary files differ
diff --git a/old/66049-h.zip b/old/66049-h.zip
deleted file mode 100644
index 0752275..0000000
--- a/old/66049-h.zip
+++ /dev/null
Binary files differ
diff --git a/old/66049-h/66049-h.htm b/old/66049-h/66049-h.htm
deleted file mode 100644
index 486b61f..0000000
--- a/old/66049-h/66049-h.htm
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,7939 +0,0 @@
-<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN"
- "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd">
-<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en" lang="en">
- <head>
- <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;charset=utf-8" />
- <meta http-equiv="Content-Style-Type" content="text/css" />
- <title>
- Pictorial Beauty on the Screen, by Victor Oscar Freeburg—A Project Gutenberg eBook
- </title>
- <link rel="coverpage" href="images/cover.jpg" />
- <style type="text/css">
-
-body {
- margin-left: 2.5em;
- margin-right: 2.5em;
-}
-
-h1, h2 {
- text-align: center;
- clear: both;
- margin-top: 2.5em;
- margin-bottom: 1em;
- word-spacing: .2em;
-}
-
-h2+p {margin-top: 1.5em;}
-h2 .subhead {display: block; margin-top: 1em; margin-bottom: 1em;}
-
-.transnote h2 {
- margin-top: .5em;
- margin-bottom: 1em;
-}
-
-.subhead {
- text-indent: 0;
- text-align: center;
- font-size: smaller;
-}
-
-p {
- text-indent: 1.75em;
- margin-top: .51em;
- margin-bottom: .24em;
- text-align: justify;
-}
-.center p, p.center {text-align: center; text-indent: 0;}
-
-.p0 {margin-top: 0em;}
-.p2 {margin-top: 2em;}
-.p4 {margin-top: 4em;}
-.b1 {margin-bottom: 1em;}
-.b2 {margin-bottom: 2em;}
-.vspace {line-height: 1.5;}
-
-.in0 {text-indent: 0;}
-
-.small {font-size: 70%;}
-.smaller {font-size: 85%;}
-.larger {font-size: 125%;}
-.large {font-size: 150%;}
-.xxlarge {font-size: 200%;}
-
-.center {text-align: center;}
-
-.smcap {font-variant: small-caps;}
-.firstword {font-variant: small-caps;}
-
-.bold {font-weight: bold;}
-
-hr {
- width: 33%;
- margin: 4em auto 4em auto;
- clear: both;
-}
-
-table {
- margin-left: auto;
- margin-right: auto;
- max-width: 80%;
- border-collapse: collapse;
-}
-
-td {padding-bottom: .5em;}
-.small td {padding-bottom: 0;}
-
-.tdl {
- text-align: left;
- vertical-align: top;
- padding-right: 1em;
- padding-left: 1.5em;
- text-indent: -1.5em;
-}
-
-.tdr {
- text-align: right;
- vertical-align: bottom;
- padding-left: .3em;
- white-space: nowrap;
-}
-.tdr.top{vertical-align: top; padding-left: 0; padding-right: 1em;}
-
-.pagenum {
- position: absolute;
- right: .25em;
- text-indent: 0;
- text-align: right;
- font-size: 70%;
- font-weight: normal;
- font-variant: normal;
- font-style: normal;
- letter-spacing: normal;
- line-height: normal;
- color: #acacac;
- border: .0625em solid #acacac;
- background: #ffffff;
- padding: .0625em .125em;
-}
-
-.figcenter {
- margin: 2em auto 2em auto;
- text-align: center;
- page-break-inside: avoid;
- max-width: 100%;
-
-}
-.figcenter.b1 {margin-bottom: 1em;}
-
-img {
- padding: 1em 0 .5em 0;
- max-width: 100%;
- height: auto;
-}
-
-.caption {text-align: justify; margin-top: 0; text-indent: 1.5em;}
-
-.footnote {
- border: thin dashed black;
- margin: 1.5em 10%;
- padding: .5em 1em .5em 1.5em;
-}
-
-.footnote {font-size: .95em;}
-.footnote p {text-indent: 1em;}
-.footnote p.in0 {text-indent: 0;}
-
-.fnanchor {
- vertical-align: 60%;
- line-height: .7;
- font-size: smaller;
- text-decoration: none;
-}
-.footnote .fnanchor {font-size: .8em;}
-
-a.ref {text-decoration: none;}
-
-.blockquot {
- margin: 1.5em 5% 1.5em 5%;
- font-size: 95%;
-}
-
-.blockquot.inhead p {padding-left: 1.5em; text-indent: -1.5em;}
-.blockquot.inhead.center p {padding-left: 0; text-indent: 0; text-align: center;}
-
-.poetry-container {
- margin: 1.5em auto;
- text-align: center;
- font-size: 98%;
-}
-
-.poetry {
- display: inline-block;
- text-align: left;
- margin-left: 0;
-}
-
-.poetry .stanza {padding: 0.5em 0;}
-.poetry .verse {text-indent: -3em; padding-left: 3em;}
-
-.poetry .indentq {text-indent: -3.45em;}
-.poetry .indent0 {text-indent: -3em;}
-
-.transnote {
- background-color: #999999;
- border: thin dotted;
- font-family: sans-serif, serif;
- margin-left: 5%;
- margin-right: 5%;
- margin-top: 4em;
- margin-bottom: 2em;
- padding: 1em;
-}
-
-.sigright {
- margin-right: 2em;
- text-align: right;}
-
-.wspace {word-spacing: .3em;}
-
-span.locked {white-space:nowrap;}
-.pagenum br {display: none; visibility: hidden;}
-.narrow {max-width: 25em; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;}
-
-@media print, handheld
-{
- body {margin: 0;}
-
- h1, .chapter, .newpage {page-break-before: always;}
- h1.nobreak, h2.nobreak, .nobreak {page-break-before: avoid; padding-top: 0;}
-
- p {
- margin-top: .5em;
- text-align: justify;
- margin-bottom: .25em;
- }
-
- table {width: auto; max-width: 100%; margin: 1em auto 1em auto;}
-
- .tdl {
- padding-left: 1em;
- text-indent: -1em;
- padding-right: 0;
- }
-
- .figcenter {max-width: 100%; margin: 0 auto 0 auto;}
- img {max-height: 80%;}
-
- hr {
- margin-top: .1em;
- margin-bottom: .1em;
- visibility: hidden;
- color: white;
- width: .01em;
- display: none;
- }
-
- .blockquot {margin: 1.5em 3% 1.5em 3%;}
- .poetry-container {text-align: center;}
- .poetry {display: block; text-align: left; margin-left: 1.5em;}
- .poetry .stanza {page-break-inside: avoid;}
-
- .transnote {
- page-break-inside: avoid;
- margin-left: 2%;
- margin-right: 2%;
- margin-top: 1em;
- margin-bottom: 1em;
- padding: .5em;
- }
-
-}
-
- </style>
- </head>
-
-<body>
-<p style='text-align:center; font-size:1.2em; font-weight:bold'>The Project Gutenberg eBook of Pictorial Beauty on the Screen, by Victor Oscar Freeburg</p>
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States and
-most other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no restrictions
-whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms
-of the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online
-at <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org">www.gutenberg.org</a>. If you
-are not located in the United States, you will have to check the laws of the
-country where you are located before using this eBook.
-</div>
-
-<p style='display:block; margin-top:1em; margin-bottom:1em; margin-left:2em; text-indent:-2em'>Title: Pictorial Beauty on the Screen</p>
- <p style='display:block; margin-top:1em; margin-bottom:0; margin-left:2em; text-indent:-2em'>Author: Victor Oscar Freeburg</p>
- <p style='display:block; margin-top:1em; margin-bottom:0; margin-left:2em; text-indent:-2em'>Contributor: Rex Ingram</p>
-<p style='display:block; text-indent:0; margin:1em 0'>Release Date: August 12, 2021 [eBook #66049]</p>
-<p style='display:block; text-indent:0; margin:1em 0'>Language: English</p>
- <p style='display:block; margin-top:1em; margin-bottom:0; margin-left:2em; text-indent:-2em; text-align:left'>Produced by: Charlene Taylor, Charlie Howard, and the Online Distributed Proofreading Team at https://www.pgdp.net (This file was produced from images generously made available by The Internet Archive/American Libraries.)</p>
-<div style='margin-top:2em; margin-bottom:4em'>*** START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK PICTORIAL BEAUTY ON THE SCREEN ***</div>
-
-<div class="transnote">
-<p class="center larger">Transcriber's Note</p>
-
-<p>Larger versions of most illustrations may be seen by right-clicking them
-and selecting an option to view them separately, or by double-tapping and/or
-stretching them.</p>
-</div>
-
-<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_i">i</span></p>
-
-<h1>PICTORIAL BEAUTY ON THE SCREEN</h1>
-
-<hr />
-
-<div class="chapter"><div class="p4 center wspace smaller">
-<div id="if_i_001" class="figcenter b1" style="max-width: 12em;">
- <img src="images/i_001.png" width="582" height="204" alt="" /></div>
-
-<p>
-THE MACMILLAN COMPANY<br />
-
-<span class="smaller">NEW YORK · BOSTON · CHICAGO · DALLAS<br />
-ATLANTA · SAN FRANCISCO</span></p>
-
-<p>MACMILLAN &amp; CO., <span class="smcap">Limited</span><br />
-
-<span class="smaller">LONDON · BOMBAY · CALCUTTA<br />
-MELBOURNE</span></p>
-
-<p>THE MACMILLAN CO. OF CANADA, <span class="smcap">Ltd.</span><br />
-<span class="smaller">TORONTO</span>
-</p>
-</div></div>
-
-<hr />
-
-<div id="i_frontis" class="newpage figcenter" style="max-width: 45em;">
- <img src="images/i_003.jpg" width="2859" height="1653" alt="" />
- <div class="caption">From <i>The Covered Wagon</i>. The rich variety of light and shadow in this scene, combined with the simple strength
-of the moving pattern, makes it one of the most charming sections in a remarkable photoplay. See <a href="#Page_9">pages 9</a>, <a href="#Page_66">66</a> and <a href="#Page_140">140</a>.</div></div>
-
-<hr />
-
-<div class="chapter"><div class="newpage p2 center wspace vspace">
-<p class="xxlarge bold">
-PICTORIAL BEAUTY<br />
-ON THE SCREEN</p>
-
-<p class="p4">BY<br />
-
-<span class="large">VICTOR OSCAR FREEBURG, <span class="smcap">Ph.D.</span></span><br />
-
-AUTHOR OF “THE ART OF PHOTOPLAY MAKING,” AND<br />
-“DISGUISE PLOTS IN ELIZABETHAN DRAMA.”</p>
-
-<p class="p4"><span class="large">WITH A PREFATORY NOTE</span><br />
-<span class="smcap larger">By Rex Ingram</span></p>
-
-<p class="p4"><span class="bold">New York</span><br />
-<span class="larger">THE MACMILLAN COMPANY<br />
-1923</span><br />
-<span class="smaller"><i>All rights reserved</i></span>
-</p>
-
-<hr />
-
-<p class="newpage p2 small">
-PRINTED IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.</p>
-
-<p class="p4 small"><span class="smcap">Copyright, 1923,<br />
-By</span> THE MACMILLAN COMPANY.</p>
-
-<p class="small">Set up and electrotyped. Published October, 1923.</p>
-</div></div>
-
-<hr />
-
-<div class="newpage p4 center narrow vspace larger">
-<p>To<br />
-<span class="larger">JAMES CRUZE</span>
-</p>
-
-<p>Because the Various Types of Pictorial Beauty
-Described in this Book May Be Seen Richly
-Blended with Epic Narrative and Stirring Drama
-in “The Covered Wagon,” a Cinema Composition
-That Will Live</p>
-</div>
-
-<hr />
-
-<div class="chapter">
-<h2 class="nobreak" id="PREFATORY_NOTE">PREFATORY NOTE</h2>
-</div>
-
-<p class="p0 b2 center"><i>By</i> <span class="smcap">Rex Ingram</span>, <i>Director of the “Four Horsemen of
-the Apocalypse,” “Scaramouche,” etc., etc.</i></p>
-
-<p>In this volume Dr. Freeburg contends that in order
-to be classified among the Arts, the Cinema must become
-something more than a series of clear photographs
-of things in motion.</p>
-
-<p>In other words, a motion picture must be composed
-of scenes that have certain pictorial qualifications,
-such as form, composition, and a proper distribution
-of light and shade.</p>
-
-<p>It is chiefly according to the degree in which these
-qualities are present in a picture, that it can register
-the full effectiveness of its drama, characterizations
-and atmosphere.</p>
-
-<p>Dr. Freeburg handles his subject clearly and comprehensively,
-and I know that the majority who read
-this book will gain a great deal more enjoyment than
-previously from productions of the calibre of “Broken
-Blossoms,” “Dr. Caligari,” “Blind Husbands,” “Dr.
-Jekyll and Mr. Hyde,” “Nanook of the North,” and
-films more numerous than I can mention by such picture
-makers as Messrs. Griffith, Seastrom, Tourneur,
-Von Stroheim and Lubitsch.</p>
-
-<p class="sigright">
-<span class="smcap">Rex Ingram.</span>
-</p>
-
-<p class="in0 smaller">August 5th, 1923.</p>
-
-<hr />
-
-<div class="chapter">
-<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_ix">ix</span></p>
-
-<h2 class="nobreak" id="AUTHORS_PREFACE">AUTHOR’S PREFACE</h2>
-</div>
-
-<p>If I look upon a motion picture as a kind of substitute
-for some stage play or novel, it seems to me a
-poor thing, only a substitute for something better;
-but if I look upon it as something real in itself, a
-new form of pictorial art in which things have somehow
-been conjured into significant motion, then I get
-many a glimpse of touching beauty, and I always see
-a great range of possibilities for richer beauties in
-future examples of this new art. Then I see the motion
-picture as the equal of any of the elder arts.</p>
-
-<p>In other words, I enjoy the movies as pictures, and
-I do not enjoy them as anything else but pictures. Yet
-it is on the pictorial side that the movies are now in
-greatest need of improvement. And this need will
-probably continue for at least another ten years. I
-feel that a book such as this may prove to be of considerable
-help in bringing about that improvement.
-So far as I know, this is the first book in which a
-systematic analysis of pictorial composition on the
-screen has been attempted, although there are certain
-earlier books in which the pictorial art of the screen
-has been appraised without analysis, the pioneer work
-in that class being Vachel Lindsay’s “Art of the Moving
-Picture.” The most original things in my present
-volume are to be found in the chapters on “Pictorial
-Motions”—or, at least, they ought to be there, else<span class="pagenum" id="Page_x">x</span>
-I am to blame, because that is the phase of cinematic
-art which has hitherto received the least attention
-from critics.</p>
-
-<p>“Movie fans” in general are my audience, my hope
-being that they may find something new in this discussion,
-something, here and there, which they had
-not themselves thought of, but which will help them
-toward a conscious and keen enjoyment of beauty
-scarcely observed before, and to a more certain discrimination
-between genuine art on the screen and
-mere pretentious imitations of art.</p>
-
-<p>In order not to confuse the issue, I have purposely
-omitted discussions of plot, dramatic situation, characterization,
-etc., except where these matters are so
-intimately connected with pictorial form that an omission
-would be impossible. In short, it is what the picture
-looks like, rather than what it tells, which here
-occupies our attention. This study is, therefore, supplementary
-to my book “The Art of Photoplay Making,”
-which is published by The Macmillan Company.</p>
-
-<p>Mr. James O. Spearing, who was for five years the
-distinguished motion picture critic on the <i>New York
-Times</i>, and is now on the production staff of the
-Goldwyn Pictures Corporation, has been kind enough
-to criticize the manuscript of the present work, and I
-take pride in thanking him publicly for having thus
-served me with his extensive knowledge and cultivated
-taste.</p>
-
-<p class="sigright">V. O. F.</p>
-
-<p class="p0 in0 smaller">The National Arts Club,<br />
-New York City,<br />
-August 27th, 1923.</p>
-
-<hr />
-
-<div class="chapter">
-<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_xi">xi</span></p>
-
-<h2 class="nobreak" id="CONTENTS">CONTENTS</h2>
-</div>
-
-<table id="toc" summary="Contents">
-<tr class="small">
- <td class="tdr top">CHAP.</td>
- <td> </td>
- <td class="tdr">PAGE</td>
-</tr>
-<tr>
- <td class="tdr top">I.</td>
- <td class="tdl"><span class="smcap">Pictorial Art in the Movies</span></td>
- <td class="tdr"><a href="#toclink_1">1</a></td>
-</tr>
-<tr>
- <td class="tdr top">II.</td>
- <td class="tdl"><span class="smcap">The Practical Value of Pictorial Composition</span></td>
- <td class="tdr"><a href="#toclink_9">9</a></td>
-</tr>
-<tr>
- <td class="tdr top">III.</td>
- <td class="tdl"><span class="smcap">Eye Tests for Beauty</span></td>
- <td class="tdr"><a href="#toclink_25">25</a></td>
-</tr>
-<tr>
- <td class="tdr top">IV.</td>
- <td class="tdl"><span class="smcap">Pictorial Force in Fixed Patterns</span></td>
- <td class="tdr"><a href="#toclink_50">50</a></td>
-</tr>
-<tr>
- <td class="tdr top">V.</td>
- <td class="tdl"><span class="smcap">Rhythm and Repose in Fixed Design</span></td>
- <td class="tdr"><a href="#toclink_68">68</a></td>
-</tr>
-<tr>
- <td class="tdr top">VI.</td>
- <td class="tdl"><span class="smcap">Motions in a Picture</span></td>
- <td class="tdr"><a href="#toclink_83">83</a></td>
-</tr>
-<tr>
- <td class="tdr top">VII.</td>
- <td class="tdl"><span class="smcap">Pictorial Motions at Work</span></td>
- <td class="tdr"><a href="#toclink_97">97</a></td>
-</tr>
-<tr>
- <td class="tdr top">VIII.</td>
- <td class="tdl"><span class="smcap">Pictorial Motions at Play</span></td>
- <td class="tdr"><a href="#toclink_116">116</a></td>
-</tr>
-<tr>
- <td class="tdr top">IX.</td>
- <td class="tdl"><span class="smcap">Pictorial Motions at Rest</span></td>
- <td class="tdr"><a href="#toclink_128">128</a></td>
-</tr>
-<tr>
- <td class="tdr top">X.</td>
- <td class="tdl"><span class="smcap">Mastery in the Movies</span></td>
- <td class="tdr"><a href="#toclink_154">154</a></td>
-</tr>
-<tr>
- <td class="tdr top">XI.</td>
- <td class="tdl"><span class="smcap">The Mysterious Emotions of Art</span></td>
- <td class="tdr"><a href="#toclink_178">178</a></td>
-</tr>
-</table>
-
-<hr />
-
-<div class="chapter">
-<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_xvi">xvi</span></p>
-
-<h2 class="nobreak" id="LIST_OF_ILLUSTRATIONS">LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS</h2>
-</div>
-
-<table id="loi" summary="List of Illustrations">
-<tr>
- <td class="tdl">“The Covered Wagon.” Prairie Scene</td>
- <td class="tdr"><a href="#i_frontis"><i>Frontispiece</i></a></td>
-</tr>
-<tr class="small">
- <td></td>
- <td class="tdr">FACING<br />PAGE</td>
-</tr>
-<tr>
- <td class="tdl">“The Plough Girl”</td>
- <td class="tdr"><a href="#if_i_011">11</a></td>
-</tr>
-<tr>
- <td class="tdl">“The Shepherdess.” By LeRolle</td>
- <td class="tdr"><a href="#if_i_021">21</a></td>
-</tr>
-<tr>
- <td class="tdl">“The Spell of the Yukon.” Cabin Scene</td>
- <td class="tdr"><a href="#if_i_028a">28</a></td>
-</tr>
-<tr>
- <td class="tdl">A Study of Composition in “The Spell of the Yukon”</td>
- <td class="tdr"><a href="#if_i_028b">28</a></td>
-</tr>
-<tr>
- <td class="tdl">“Daylight and Lamplight.” By Paxton</td>
- <td class="tdr"><a href="#if_i_039a">39</a></td>
-</tr>
-<tr>
- <td class="tdl">A Study of Lines</td>
- <td class="tdr"><a href="#if_i_039b">39</a></td>
-</tr>
-<tr>
- <td class="tdl">“Audrey”</td>
- <td class="tdr"><a href="#if_i_045">45</a></td>
-</tr>
-<tr>
- <td class="tdl">A Still Illustrating Misplaced Emphasis</td>
- <td class="tdr"><a href="#if_i_055a">55</a></td>
-</tr>
-<tr>
- <td class="tdl">A Specimen of Bad Composition</td>
- <td class="tdr"><a href="#if_i_055b">55</a></td>
-</tr>
-<tr>
- <td class="tdl">“The Spell of the Yukon.” Exterior</td>
- <td class="tdr"><a href="#if_i_057">57</a></td>
-</tr>
-<tr>
- <td class="tdl">A Triangle Pattern</td>
- <td class="tdr"><a href="#if_i_061">61</a></td>
-</tr>
-<tr>
- <td class="tdl">“Derby Day.” By Rowlandson</td>
- <td class="tdr"><a href="#if_i_064a">64</a></td>
-</tr>
-<tr>
- <td class="tdl">A Study of Composition in “Derby Day”</td>
- <td class="tdr"><a href="#if_i_064b">64</a></td>
-</tr>
-<tr>
- <td class="tdl">“Maria Rosa”</td>
- <td class="tdr"><a href="#if_i_071">71</a></td>
-</tr>
-<tr>
- <td class="tdl">“Mme. LeBrun and Her Daughter.” By Mme. LeBrun</td>
- <td class="tdr"><a href="#if_i_076">76</a></td>
-</tr>
-<tr>
- <td class="tdl">“Polly of the Circus”</td>
- <td class="tdr"><a href="#if_i_079a">79</a></td>
-</tr>
-<tr>
- <td class="tdl">“Banquet of the Officers of St. Andrew.” By Hals</td>
- <td class="tdr"><a href="#if_i_079b">79</a></td>
-</tr>
-<tr>
- <td class="tdl">“The Covered Wagon.” Arroyo Scene</td>
- <td class="tdr"><a href="#if_i_093">93</a></td>
-</tr>
-<tr>
- <td class="tdl">A Typical Bad Movie Composition</td>
- <td class="tdr"><a href="#if_i_100a">100</a></td>
-</tr>
-<tr>
- <td class="tdl">“Sherlock Holmes”</td>
- <td class="tdr"><a href="#if_i_100b">100</a></td>
-</tr>
-<tr>
- <td class="tdl">“The Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse”</td>
- <td class="tdr"><a href="#if_i_133">133</a></td>
-</tr>
-<tr>
- <td class="tdl">“Portrait of Charles I.” By Van Dyck</td>
- <td class="tdr"><a href="#if_i_163">163</a></td>
-</tr>
-<tr>
- <td class="tdl">“The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari”</td>
- <td class="tdr"><a href="#if_i_179">179</a></td>
-</tr>
-</table>
-
-<hr />
-
-<div id="toclink_1" class="chapter">
-<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_1">1</span></p>
-
-<h2 class="nobreak" id="Pictorial_Beauty_On_the_Screen"><span class="larger">Pictorial Beauty On the Screen</span></h2>
-
-<hr />
-
-<h2 class="nobreak" id="CHAPTER_I">CHAPTER I<br />
-
-<span class="subhead">PICTORIAL ART IN THE MOVIES</span></h2>
-</div>
-
-<p class="in0"><span class="firstword">Vast</span> armies of “movie fans” in massed formation
-move in and out of the theaters day after day and night
-after night. They may be trampled on, stumbled over,
-suffocated; they may have to wait wearily for seats
-and even for a glimpse of the screen, and yet they
-come, drawn by a lure which they never dream of
-denying. Yet the individuals in these crowds are not
-the helpless victims of mob impulses. Choose the
-average person among them, and you will find that he
-is able to criticize what he sees. He has developed no
-small degree of artistic taste during all the hundreds of
-nights which he has spent with eyes fixed upon the
-screen. He can, at least, tell the difference between a
-dull, common-place plot and one that is original and
-thrilling. He can distinguish between the reasonable
-and the ridiculous. He is perfectly aware that much of
-what he sees is plain “bunk,” that it is false, or silly,
-or of no consequence; and yet, after waiting patiently,
-he is quick to catch the honest message of significant
-truth when it comes. He is trained in the appreciation
-of screen acting, and does not confuse mere showy performance<span class="pagenum" id="Page_2">2</span>
-with sincere, sympathetic interpretation of a
-dramatic character. And now, at last, the “average
-movie fan” is beginning to demand that motion pictures
-have real pictorial beauty, that they be something more
-than clear photographs of things in motion.</p>
-
-<p>Here we have struck the measure of the motion picture’s
-possibilities as a new art. The masses who pay
-for tickets have the situation entirely in their hands.
-Photoplays are improving year by year principally because
-the public wants better photoplays year by year.
-When the movies were new, people were satisfied with
-novelties, mechanical tricks, sensational “stunts,” pictures
-of sensational people, pictures of pretty places,
-etc., but, although they appreciated what was called
-good photography, they expressed no craving for genuine
-pictorial beauty. Later on came the craze for adaptations
-of popular novels and stage plays to the screen.
-This was really a great step forward. The motion
-picture was no longer a mere toy or trick, but was being
-looked upon as a real art medium. The public had
-developed a taste for the exciting, clearly told story,
-and this demand was satisfied by hundreds of excellent
-photoplays—excellent, at least, according to the
-standards of the day. Yet the “fans” might have
-asked for more. They got the story of a famous novel
-or play, with fairly well acted interpretations by screen
-folk in proper costumes, and with scenes and settings
-that usually answered to the descriptions in the literary
-work adapted; they even got, here and there, a
-“pretty” view or a chance grouping of striking beauty,
-but they did not regularly get, or ask for, the kind of
-beauty which we are accustomed to find in the masterpieces
-of painting. But taste has been developed by<span class="pagenum" id="Page_3">3</span>
-tasting, and at last the craving for pictorial art has
-come.</p>
-
-<p>Along with this new public demand for better pictorial
-qualities in the motion pictures have come higher
-ideals to those who make and distribute motion pictures.
-The producers are awakening to their opportunities.
-They are no longer content with resurrecting defunct
-stage plays and picturizing them hurriedly, with
-only enough additions to the bare plot to make the
-photoplay last five reels. It is not now so much a
-question of fixing over something old, as of constructing
-something new. They are beginning to think in
-terms of pictorial motion. The directors, too—those
-who have not been forced out of the studios by their
-lack of ability—have learned their art of pictorial composition
-in much the same way as the public has developed
-its taste, that is, by experience. Once they
-seemed to think that it was enough to tell the heroine
-when to sob or raise her eyebrows; now they realize
-that the lines and pattern of the entire figure should
-be pictorially related to every other line and pattern
-which is to be recorded by the camera and shown upon
-the screen. And, finally, along with the director’s rise
-in power and importance is coming the better subordination
-of the “stars,” and yet they shine not the less
-brightly on the screen.</p>
-
-<p>The early exhibitors were often accused of being
-“ballyhoo” men, hawking their wares of more or less
-questionable character. Most of them, indeed, never
-suspected that motion pictures might contain beauty.
-Now the worst of them can at least be classed with
-picture dealers who value their goods because others
-love them, while the best, including such men as Dr.<span class="pagenum" id="Page_4">4</span>
-Hugo Riesenfeld, have made exhibition itself a new
-art. They select pictures with conscientious taste,
-place them in a harmonious program, and show them
-in a theatrical setting that gives the right mood for
-æsthetic appreciation on the part of the audience.</p>
-
-<p>Publicity men, too, have felt the temper of the public.
-Although they still like to exploit sensational features,
-the language of art is creeping into their “dope.”
-They are beginning to find phrases for the kind of
-beauty in a film which does not come from a ravishing
-“star” or the lavish expenditure of money. And
-the independent reviewers whose criticisms are published
-in the newspapers and magazines have become
-professional. There was a time when they contented
-themselves with listing the cast, revealing the plot in
-a paragraph, and adding that “the photography is
-excellent.” But now we find thoughtful, discriminating
-criticisms of photoplays in the film magazines and
-in the leading daily papers of the country. These
-critics have learned how to analyze the narrative as a
-dramatic construction, and how to evaluate the interpretation
-of character in the acting, but they have also
-learned something else, and this belongs to the new
-epoch in the development of the photoplay; they have
-begun to observe the pictorial art in motion pictures,
-the endless possibilities of beauty in the pictorial combination
-of figure, setting, and action; in the arrangement
-of lines and masses, of lights and shadows, and
-in the fascinating rhythms of movement on the screen.</p>
-
-<p>This conscious desire for beauty on the screen, which
-is springing up all along the line, from the producer
-to the ultimate “fan,” has naturally led to public discussion.
-In school room and church, on “lot” and<span class="pagenum" id="Page_5">5</span>
-“location,” in office and studio, in club or casual group,
-men and women are trying to find words and phrases
-to express the cinematic beauty which they have sensed.
-And by that discussion they are sharpening their senses
-for the discovery of richer beauty in the films that are
-to come. My contribution to that discussion has taken
-the form of this book, and my aim has been, first, to
-collect the topics which are connected with the purely
-pictorial side of the movies, and, second, to formulate
-my conception of some of the principles which govern
-the creation of pictorial beauty on the screen. I have
-endeavored to see my subject from various angles, assuming
-at times the position of the sensitive spectator
-and at times standing, as it were, beside the average
-director, and presuming to suggest to him what he
-ought to do to please that spectator.</p>
-
-<p>To begin with, let us take care to avoid some of the
-common pitfalls of photoplay criticism. It has been
-a common error to judge a photoplay as though it
-were a kind of visualized book. Many of us have
-slipped into the mistake of expecting motion photographs
-to give us the same kind of pleasure which
-we get from printed or spoken words. But let us understand
-from now on that the beauty of a design-and-motion
-art must of necessity be quite different
-from the beauty of a word-and-voice art.</p>
-
-<p>This means that we shall have to get out of the
-habit of using expressions like “He is <em>writing</em> a photoplay.”
-A writer might indeed devise a story for a
-motion picture play, as he might originate and describe
-an idea for a painting, but it would not in either case
-be proper to say that he had <em>written</em> the picture. This
-book is not a study of words, phrases, sentences, paragraphs,<span class="pagenum" id="Page_6">6</span>
-etc. It does not deal with literary expression.
-It deals with fixed and moving designs, the things
-which the spectator actually sees, the only forms which
-actually hold and present the contents of a photoplay.
-At times we shall, of course, be obliged to say something
-about the familiar “sub-titles,” which interrupt
-the pictorial flow in a film. But word-forms are not
-characteristic photoplay forms. Fundamentally, a
-photoplay is a sequence of motion pictures, and a man
-can no more write those pictures than he can write a
-row of paintings on a wall. However, it would be
-unfair to say that a writer could not in some way lend
-a hand in the making of a motion picture; we merely
-insist that the finished picture should not be judged as
-writing.</p>
-
-<p>We must also get rid of the notion that “photoplays
-are <em>acted</em>.” It would hardly be further from the
-truth to say that paintings are posed. A finished
-painting may, in fact, contain the image of some person
-who has posed for the artist; but the painting contains
-something else far more significant. We cannot
-thank Raphael’s model for the beauty of “The Sistine
-Madonna,” nor can we thank Charles I. of England
-for the beauty of Van Dyck’s portraits of him. Turning
-to movies, it must be admitted that actors are
-tremendously important, but it must not be said that
-they act motion pictures. They only act while motion
-pictures are being made. We cannot thank them for
-the poignant beauty of glowing lights and falling
-shadows, of flowing lines, and melting forms, and all
-that strange evanescence that makes up the lure of
-cinematic forms.</p>
-
-<p>Also we must reject the theory that the artistic<span class="pagenum" id="Page_7">7</span>
-quality of a photoplay can be guaranteed by engaging
-so-called art directors who design backgrounds or select
-natural settings for the action of the film story.
-The picture which we see on the screen consists not
-of backgrounds alone; it is rather an ever-varying design
-of moving figures combined with a fixed or changing
-background. If an art director limits his work to
-the preparation of material environment of photoplay
-action, he is, by definition, responsible only for the
-place-element in the motion picture. Even if he were
-to design costumes and general equipment for the
-players he would still be responsible for only a part of
-the pictorial elements that appear upon the screen.</p>
-
-<p>Plot, performers, places, equipment—these are only
-the materials which a picture-maker puts into cinematic
-forms. The art does not lie in the separate materials;
-it lies in the organization of those materials,
-a process which may be called cinema composition.<a id="FNanchor_1" href="#Footnote_1" class="fnanchor">A</a>
-In a later chapter we shall discuss the proposition that
-the motion picture director is, or certainly should be,
-the master cinema composer. Here we simply want
-to make the point that criticism should concern itself
-with the finished composition as a whole and not
-with the parts alone. The critic who is interested
-only in the plot construction of photoplays may indeed
-be able to make penetrating comment upon such
-dramatic qualities as suspense, logic, etc., but he cannot
-thereby give us any information on those visual
-aspects which please or displease the eye while the
-picture is showing. Thus also the critic who looks only<span class="pagenum" id="Page_8">8</span>
-at the acting in the photoplay is likely to be misled and
-to mislead us. He may not observe, for example, that
-a film which has bad joining of scenes, or a bad combination
-of figure and setting, is a bad cinema composition,
-however superb the acting may be. And the
-critic who writes, “The photography is excellent,”—a
-rubber-stamp criticism—is of no help to art-lovers,
-because the photography as such may indeed be excellent
-while the composition of the scenes photographed
-is atrocious. Cinema criticism, to be of any real value
-to the “movie fan,” must be complete. And that means
-that he must be enlightened concerning the nature of
-pictorial design and pictorial progression, as well as
-concerning the plot, the acting, and the mechanics of
-photography.</p>
-
-<div class="footnote">
-
-<p><a id="Footnote_1" href="#FNanchor_1" class="fnanchor">A</a> The terms “cinema composer” and “cinema composition” were
-devised by the author in 1916, at the time when he and his students
-founded the Cinema Composers Club at Columbia University.</p>
-
-</div>
-
-<p>All of us are beginners in this pioneer work of
-analyzing the motion picture as a design-and-motion
-art. But the prize is well worth the adventure. Certainly
-the danger of making mistakes need not alarm
-us unduly, for even a mistake may be interesting and
-helpful. At the start we need to sharpen our insight
-by learning as much about the grammar of pictorial
-art as we know about the grammar of language,
-by respecting the logic of line and tone as highly as
-the logic of fictitious events, by paying tribute to
-originality in the pattern of pictorial motions no
-less than to the novelty in fresh dramatic situations.
-Beyond that the prospect is alluring. Our new
-understanding will give us greater enjoyment of
-the pictorial beauty which even now comes to the
-screen, and the rumor of that enjoyment, sounding
-through the studios, will assure of us of still greater
-beauty in the future.</p>
-
-<hr />
-
-<div id="toclink_9" class="chapter">
-<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_9">9</span></p>
-
-<h2 class="nobreak" id="CHAPTER_II">CHAPTER II<br />
-
-<span class="subhead">THE PRACTICAL VALUE OF PICTORIAL COMPOSITION</span></h2>
-</div>
-
-<p class="in0"><span class="firstword">The</span> production manager of a large motion picture
-studio in New York once declared to the author that
-he was “against artistry in the movies because it usually
-spoils the picture.” “Emotion’s what gets ’em, not
-art,” he added. “Besides, a director has to shoot thirty
-or forty scenes a day, and hasn’t got any time to fool
-away with art notions.”</p>
-
-<p>Any one who has seen “The Covered Wagon” (directed
-by James Cruze for the Famous Players-Lasky
-Corporation) knows that such talk is nonsense. This
-remarkable photoplay charms the eye, appeals to the
-imagination, and stirs the emotions—all in the same
-“shot.” One can never forget the pictorial beauty in
-those magnificent expanses of barren prairie, traversed
-by the long train of covered wagons, a white line
-winding in slow rhythm, while a softly rising cloud of
-dust blends the tones of the curving canvas tops and
-of the wind-blown sage brush. Again and again the
-wagon train becomes a striking pictorial motif, and,
-whether it is seen creeping across the prairie, following
-the bank of a river, climbing toward a pass in the
-mountains, stretching out, a thin black chain of silhouettes
-on the horizon, curving itself along the palisade-like
-walls of an arroyo, or halted in snow against
-a background of Oregon pines, it always adds emphasis<span class="pagenum" id="Page_10">10</span>
-to the intense drama of the pioneers battling against
-the hardships of the trail in ’48 and ’49. Here is entrancing
-change and flow of pattern, but here is human
-striving and performance, too; and the emotions of
-the audience are touched more directly and more
-deeply because picture and drama have been fused
-into a single art.</p>
-
-<p>Shortly after “The Covered Wagon” had opened
-in New York an executive of a certain film company
-was heard to remark, “Well, no wonder it’s a success.
-It cost $700,000 to make it! Any one could
-take that much money and make a great picture.” I
-consider that reflection highly unjust and the argument
-entirely fallacious. Good pictorial composition
-does not necessarily cost a cent more than bad composition.
-In fact, it will be shown in the following
-chapters that a scene of cinematic beauty often costs
-less than an ordinary arrangement of the same scene.</p>
-
-<p>The pictorial beauty discussed in this book is really
-a kind of pictorial efficiency, and therefore must have
-practical, economic value. When a motion picture is
-well composed it pleases the eye, its meaning is easily
-understood, and the emotion it contains is quickly and
-forcefully conveyed. In short, it has the power of
-art.</p>
-
-<p>Pictorial efficiency cannot be bought. It cannot
-be guaranteed by the possession of expensive cameras
-and other mechanical equipment. The camera has no
-sense, no soul, no capacity for selecting, emphasizing,
-and interpreting the pictorial subject for the benefit
-of the spectator. In fact, the camera is positively
-stupid, because it always shows more than is necessary;
-it often emphasizes the wrong thing, and it is<span class="pagenum" id="Page_11">11</span>
-notoriously blind to beautiful significance. You who
-carry kodaks for the purpose of getting souvenirs of
-your travels have perhaps often been surprised, when
-the films were developed, to discover some very conspicuous
-object, ugly and jarring, which you had not
-noticed at the time when the picture was taken. At
-that time your mind had forced your eye to ignore
-all that was not interesting and beautiful, but the
-camera had made no such choice.</p>
-
-<div id="if_i_011" class="figcenter" style="max-width: 33em;">
- <img src="images/i_011.jpg" width="2092" height="1670" alt="" />
- <div class="caption">From <i>The Plough Girl</i>. The pictorial composition at this moment of the action is
-bad because the spectator’s eye is not led instantly to the book, which is the most important
-dramatic interest in this scene. See <a href="#Page_11">page 11</a>.</div></div>
-
-<p>It will not help matters to buy a better lens for
-your camera and to be more careful of the focus next
-time. Such things can only make the images more
-sharp; they cannot alter the emphasis. Unfortunately
-there are still movie makers, and movie “fans,” too,
-in the world who have the notion that sharpness of
-photography, or “clearness,” as they call it, is a wonderful
-quality. But such people do not appreciate
-art; they merely appreciate machinery. To make the
-separate parts of a picture more distinct does not
-help us to see the total meaning more clearly. It may,
-in fact, prevent us from seeing.</p>
-
-<p>Let us look, for example, at the “still” reproduced
-on the opposite page. The picture is clear enough.
-We observe that it contains three figures and about
-a dozen objects. Our attention is caught by a conspicuous
-lamp, whose light falls upon a suspicious-looking
-jug, with its stopper not too tightly in. Yet
-these objects, emphasized as they are, have but slight
-importance indeed when compared with the book
-clutched in the man’s hand.</p>
-
-<p>This mistake in emphasis is not the fault of the
-camera; it is the fault of the director, who in the
-haste, or ignorance, perhaps, of days gone by, composed<span class="pagenum" id="Page_12">12</span>
-the picture so badly that the spectators are
-forced to look first at the wrong things, thus wasting
-time and energy before they can find the right things.
-On the screen, to be sure, the book attracts some
-attention because it is in motion, yet that does not
-suffice to draw our attention immediately away from
-the striking objects in the foreground. The primary
-interests should, of course, have been placed in the
-strongest light and in the most prominent position.</p>
-
-<p>Guiding the attention of the spectator properly
-helps him to understand what he is looking at, but it is
-still more important to help him feel what he is looking
-at. Movie producers used to have a great deal to
-say about the need of putting “punch” into a picture,
-of making it so strong that it would “hit the audience
-between the eyes.” Well, let those hot injunctions
-still be given. We maintain that good composition
-will make any motion picture “punch” harder, and
-that bad composition will weaken the “punch,” may,
-indeed, prevent its being felt at all. But before arguing
-that proposition, let us philosophize a bit over the
-manner in which a “punch” operates on our minds.</p>
-
-<p>Anything that impresses the human mind through
-the eye requires a three-fold expenditure of human
-energy. There is, first, the physical exertion of <em>looking</em>,
-then the mental exertion of <em>seeing</em>, that is, understanding
-what one looks at, and, finally, the joy of
-<em>feeling</em>, the pouring out of emotional energy. This
-last is the “punch,” the result which every artist aims
-to produce; but it can only be achieved through the
-spectator’s enjoyment of looking and seeing.</p>
-
-<p>Now, since the total human energy available at any
-one time for looking, seeing, and feeling is limited, it<span class="pagenum" id="Page_13">13</span>
-is clearly desirable to economize in the efforts of looking
-and seeing, in order to leave so much the more
-energy for emotional enjoyment. We shall discuss
-in the following chapter some of the things which
-waste our energies during the efforts of looking and
-seeing. Let us here consider how pictorial composition
-can control the expenditure of emotional energy,
-and how it may thus either help or hinder the spectator
-in his appreciation of beauty on the screen.</p>
-
-<p>Let us imagine an example of a typical “punch”
-picture and describe it here in words—inadequate
-though they may be—to illustrate how a bad arrangement
-of events and scenes may use up the spectator’s
-emotional energy before the story arrives at the
-event intended to furnish the main thrill. The “punch”
-in this case is to be the transfer of a man from one
-airplane to another. But many other things will disturb
-us on the way, and certain striking scenes will
-rob the aerial transfer of its intended “punch.”</p>
-
-<p>First we see the hero and his pilot just starting their
-flight in a hydro-airplane, the dark compact machine
-contrasting strongly with the magnificent spread of
-white sails of a large sloop yacht—perhaps thus tending
-to focus our attention on the yacht—which skims
-along toward the left of our view.</p>
-
-<p>Then, in the next scene, near some country village,
-evidently miles away from the expanse of water in the
-first picture, we see a huge Caproni triplane, which
-must have made a forced landing in the muddy creek
-of a pasture. A herd of Holstein cows with strange
-black and white markings, two bare-footed country
-girls, a shepherd dog, and five helmeted mechanicians,
-stand helpless, all equally admiring and dumb, while<span class="pagenum" id="Page_14">14</span>
-an alert farmer hitches an amusing span of mules, one
-black and one gray, to the triplane and drags it out
-of the mud.</p>
-
-<p>The third scene is strange indeed. It looks at first
-like a dazzling sea of foam—perhaps the ocean
-churned to fury by a storm—no, you may not believe
-it, but it is a sea of clouds. We are in an airplane
-of our own high in the sky, perhaps miles and miles,
-or maybe only three-quarters of a mile, above sea level.
-Just as we become fascinated by the nests of shadows
-among the cloud billows, a black object swings up
-from the whiteness, like a dolphin or a submarine from
-the sea. It is the hydro-airplane with our hero and
-his pilot; we recognize them because they are now
-sailing abreast of us only a few yards away. The
-hero stands up and is about to assume the pose of
-Washington crossing the Delaware, a difficult thing
-in such a strong wind when he is suddenly struck
-from behind by a villain who evidently had concealed
-himself in the body of the hydro-airplane before the
-flight was started. The villain is dressed like a soldier
-and seems to have a knapsack on his back.</p>
-
-<p>Meanwhile, the sea of clouds flows by, dazzling
-white and without a rift through which one might
-look to see whether a city, an ocean, a forest, or a
-cornfield lies below.</p>
-
-<p>Suddenly we look upward and discover the triplane,
-silhouetted sharply against the sky like the
-skeleton of some monster. It has five bodies and the
-five propellors, which three or four minutes ago were
-paralyzed in the cow pasture, now are revolving so
-rapidly that we cannot see them. It would be very interesting—but
-look! the villain and the hero are having<span class="pagenum" id="Page_15">15</span>
-a little wrestling match on one of the wings of
-their plane. Let us hope the hero throws the villain
-into the clouds! He does, too! But villains are
-deucedly clever. The knapsack turns into a parachute,
-which spreads out into a white circular form,
-more circular than any of the clouds. We wonder if
-there will be any one to meet him when he lands—but,
-don’t miss it! This is the “punch”! The triplane
-is flying just above the hydro-airplane. Somebody
-lets down a rope ladder, which bends back like the
-tail of a kite. The hero grabs it, grins at the camera,
-climbs up, and with perfect calmness asks for a cigarette,
-though he doesn’t light it, because that would be
-against the pilot’s rules.</p>
-
-<p>Well, the transfer from one airplane to another
-wasn’t so much of a “punch,” after all.</p>
-
-<p>Now let us count the thrills of such a picture as
-they might come to us from the screen. First, in order
-of time, would be our delight at the stately curves of
-the gleaming sails of the yacht, but this delight would
-be dulled somewhat by the physical difficulty experienced
-by the eyes in following the swaying, thrusting
-movement of the yacht as it heels from the breeze, and
-at the same time following the rising shape of the
-hydro-airplane; and it would be further dulled by the
-mental effort of trying to see the dramatic relation
-between yacht and plane. But, whether dulled or
-not, this thrill would be all in vain, for it surely does
-not put more force into the “punch” which we set
-out to produce, namely, the transfer of a man from one
-airplane to another.</p>
-
-<p>The yacht, therefore, being unnecessary to our
-story, violates the principle of unity; it violates the<span class="pagenum" id="Page_16">16</span>
-principles of emphasis and balance, because it distracts
-our attention from the main interest; and it
-violates the principle of rhythm, because it does not
-take a part in the upward-curving succession of interests
-that should culminate with the main “punch.”</p>
-
-<p>If the plane of our hero must rise from the water,
-and if there is to be a secondary interest in the picture,
-let it be something which, though really subordinate,
-can intensify our interest in the plane. Perhaps
-a clumsy old tug would serve the purpose, its
-smoke tracing a barrier, above which the plane soars
-as easily as a bird. Or perhaps a rowboat would be
-just as well, with a fisherman gazing spellbound at
-the machine that rises into the air. Either of these
-elements would emphasize the idea of height and
-danger.</p>
-
-<p>The scene of the triplane in the pasture with the
-cows, mules, etc., might be mildly amusing. But our
-eyes would be taxed by its moving spots, and, since
-its tones would be dark or dark gray, the pupils of
-our eyes would become dilated, and would therefore
-be totally unprepared for the flash of white which follows
-in the next scene.</p>
-
-<p>The white expanse of fleecy clouds would shock
-the eyes at first sight, since the approach to the subject
-had not been properly made; but in a moment we
-would be stirred by the feeling that we were really
-above the clouds. We would seem to have passed
-into a new world with floods of mist. The long
-stretches of white are soft as eiderdown, yet, because
-of our own motion, they seem like the currents of a
-broad river, and one can almost imagine that it were
-possible to steer a canoe over those rapids. All this<span class="pagenum" id="Page_17">17</span>
-would be the second thrill, beautiful in itself but not
-actually tending to emphasize the “punch” of a man
-transferring from one airplane to another.</p>
-
-<p>The third thrill would surely come when the hydro-airplane
-swings up through these clouds, like a dolphin
-from the sea, and yet not like a dolphin, because
-it rises more slowly and in a few moments soars freely
-into the air, a marvellous happening which no words
-can describe. Yet this thrill, like the others, would
-exhaust our emotions rather than leave them fresh
-for the “punch” we started out to produce, the transfer
-of a man from one airplane to another.</p>
-
-<p>Most thrilling of all would be the moments between
-the instant when the villain is pushed off the wing of
-the plane and the instant when his parachute snaps
-open. The white mass of the parachute, almost like
-a tiny cloud, spreads out at the instant when it reaches
-the layer of clouds, as if they pushed it open; then the
-parachute sinks into the clouds and dies out like a
-wave of the sea.</p>
-
-<p>After all these thrills, the intended “punch” would
-come like a slap on the wrist. A man might now leap
-back and forth from one airplane to another until it
-was time to go home for supper, and we would only
-yawn at his exploits.</p>
-
-<p>Now one of the morals of this story is that we
-did get a “punch,” even though it was not the one
-originally intended by our imagined producer. Treasures
-often lie in unsuspected places. Nearly every
-common-place film on the screen contains some beauty
-by accident, some unexpected charm, some unforseen
-“punch,” something the director never dreamed of,
-which outshines the very beauty which he aimed to<span class="pagenum" id="Page_18">18</span>
-produce. And whenever a thoughtful person is stirred
-by such accidental beauty he is delighted to think that
-such a thing is possible. In the exceptional films, he
-knows, such effects are produced by design instead
-of by chance. It is better business, and it is better
-art.</p>
-
-<p>We said at the beginning of this chapter that it
-was clearly desirable to economize the spectator’s
-efforts of looking and seeing, in order that he may
-have the greatest possible amount of energy left for
-the experience of emotion. This is desirable even from
-a business man’s point of view. We shall now try
-to show that emotional thrills can actually be controlled
-by design, by what we shall call pictorial composition.</p>
-
-<p>But how is pictorial composition controlled, and
-who controls it? How far is the scenario writer responsible
-for pictorial value? How much of the pictorial
-composition shall the director direct, and how
-much of it may safely be left to other hands? And,
-if a picture is well composed, does that guarantee
-beauty? The answers to these questions depend upon
-our definition of terms.</p>
-
-<p>Composition in general means, of course, simply
-bringing things together into a mutual relation. A
-particular combination of parts in a picture may help
-the spectator, or may hinder him more than some other
-possible combination of the same parts. Composition
-is form, and as such should be revealing and expressive
-at the same time that it is appealing in itself.
-Good composition cannot easily be defined in a
-single sentence, but, for the sake of order in our discussion,
-I wish to offer the following as my working<span class="pagenum" id="Page_19">19</span>
-definition. The best cinema composition is that arrangement
-of elements in a scene or succession of
-scenes which enables us to see the most with the least
-difficulty and the deepest feeling.</p>
-
-<p>A remarkable thing about composition is that it
-cannot be avoided. Every picture must have some
-kind of arrangement, whether that arrangement be
-good, bad, or indifferent. As soon as an actor enters
-a room he makes a composition, because every gesture,
-every movement, every line of his body bears some
-pictorial relation to everything else within range of
-our vision. Even to draw a single line or to prick a
-single point upon a sheet of paper is to start a composition,
-because such a mark must bear some relation
-to the four unavoidable lines which are described by
-the edges of the paper.</p>
-
-<p>To place a flower in a vase is to make a composition.
-If the arrangement contains more meaning,
-more significance than the exhibition of the flower
-and the vase separately, and if this meaning can easily
-be perceived, the composition is good. A bad composition
-would doubtless result if we placed the flower
-and vase together in front of a framed photograph,
-because the three things would not fuse together into
-a unity which contained more meaning than the things
-had separately. In fact, even the separate values
-would be lost, because the vase would obscure the
-photograph, which in turn would distract our attention
-from the vase. In other words, the arrangement
-would not help us to see much with ease.</p>
-
-<p>On the other hand, to place the flower and vase
-against some hanging or panel which harmonizes with
-them in color and emphasizes the beauty of the flower,<span class="pagenum" id="Page_20">20</span>
-is good composition, providing the rest of the environment
-is in harmony. The vase must, of course, stand
-on something, perhaps a table or a mantel-piece. This
-support must have shape, lines, color and texture, all
-visual elements which must be skillfully wrought into
-our design if the composition is to be successful. We
-see, therefore, that the artistic arrangement of simple
-things which do not move, which stay where you put
-them, is by no means a simple matter.</p>
-
-<p>What we have just described may be called composition
-in a general sense, but it represents only the
-initial process in pictorial composition. The picture
-maker’s work only begins with the arranging of the
-subject. It does not end until he has recorded that
-subject in some permanent form, such as a painting,
-a drawing, or a celluloid negative. In the recording,
-or treatment, the painter tries to improve the composition
-of his subject. He changes the curves of the
-vase and the flower somewhat in order to obtain a
-more definite unity. He softens the emphasis in one
-place and heightens it in another. He balances shape
-against shape. He swings into the picture a rhythm of
-line and tone which he hopes may express to some beholder
-the harmony which he, the artist, feels. In
-other words, the painter begins by arranging things,
-he continues by altering the aspects of those things
-until they fit his conception of the perfect picture of
-the subject before him, and he finishes the composition
-only when he leaves a permanent record of what he
-has seen and felt.</p>
-
-<div id="if_i_021" class="figcenter" style="max-width: 41em;">
- <img src="images/i_021.jpg" width="2561" height="1629" alt="" />
- <div class="caption"><i>The Shepherdess</i>, a painting by LeRolle, illustrating several principles of design which can be effectively
-used in photoplays. See <a href="#Page_55">page 55</a>.</div></div>
-
-<p>Now it is evident that the painter might begin,
-without an actual flower or vase or panel or table, by
-merely arranging his mental images of those things.<span class="pagenum" id="Page_21">21</span>
-But the process would, of course, still be composition.
-If, for example, he were to say to himself “To-morrow
-I shall paint a picture of a rose in a slate-blue
-vase standing on an antique oak table backed by
-a gray panel,” that very arrangement of images in
-his mind would be the first phase of his composition.
-Or if a customer were to come to him and say “To-morrow
-I want you to paint for me a picture of a
-rose,” etc., the process of bringing things together
-would still be composition; only in that case it begins
-with the customer and is completed by the painter.</p>
-
-<p>If we apply this reasoning to the movies it is clear
-that as soon as a scenario writer writes a single line
-saying that a hydro-airplane takes off from the sea,
-he has already started a pictorial composition. Although
-he may not realize it, he has already brought
-together the long straight line of the horizon, the short
-curving lines of the waves, and the short straight and
-oblique lines of the plane. He has already made it
-necessary to combine certain tonal values of airplane
-and sky and sea, though he may not have stopped to
-consider what those tonal values might be.</p>
-
-<p>But the writer does other things of greater consequence
-than the combining of shapes and tonal values.
-He prescribes motions and locomotions of things, and
-he orders the succession of scenes. Even if he writes
-only that “a plane rises from the sea,” he makes necessary
-the combination of a great number of movements.
-On the screen that plane will have at least four
-movements, namely, rising, tilting, going toward the
-right or the left, and the movement of diminishing
-size. And the sea will have at least three movements,
-namely, undulation, flowing, and the movement of the<span class="pagenum" id="Page_22">22</span>
-wake. Now if the scenario writer adds something
-else to the same scene, or prescribes the mutual relation
-of things and movements which are to appear in
-the next scene, he is, of course, merely continuing the
-process of cinema composition.</p>
-
-<p>Insofar as the writer makes the combination of
-these things essential to the story he circumscribes the
-power, he may even tie the hands, of the director.
-For the latter, unless he ignores the composition thus
-begun, can do only one thing with it; he can only carry
-it on.</p>
-
-<p>Now it is a sad thing to relate that many scenario
-writers do not suspect the truth of what we have just
-said. Some of them are evidently unaware of the
-significant fact that their description is really a prescription,
-that even by their written words they are
-really drawing the first lines of hundreds of pictures,
-that they are actually engaged in pictorial composition.
-They may be without knowledge of graphic art
-and without skill. They may not be able to take a
-pencil or a piece of charcoal and sketch out a horse or
-a hut or the general aspect of a single pictorial moment
-as it would appear on the screen. They may
-never have given any thought to the question of how
-best to arrange simultaneous or successive movements
-in order to give the strongest emotional appeal to the
-spectator. Yet they are drawing screen pictures, and
-drawing them on the typewriter!</p>
-
-<p>Of course, even the most intelligent scenario
-writers, even those who have the most accurate knowledge
-of pictorial values on the screen and the keenest
-power of visualizing their story as it will appear after
-it has been screened, are always handicapped by working<span class="pagenum" id="Page_23">23</span>
-in the medium of language. Words are not motion-photographs,
-any more than they are paint or
-marble. This is the scenario writer’s handicap. But,
-though we may sympathize with him because of the
-handicap, we cannot relieve him of responsibility as
-the designer of beginnings in the cinema composition.</p>
-
-<p>The director has a handicap, too. He also does not
-work in the medium of motion photographs. He cannot
-do so. Even if he were to look through the view-finder
-of the motion picture camera during the entire
-taking of every scene, he would not see exactly what
-we are destined to see in the theater. He would see
-things only in miniature, in a glass some two inches
-square, instead of larger than life. He would see
-things, not in black and white, but in their true colors.
-And he can never, under any circumstance, behold two
-or more scenes directly connected, with no more than
-the wink of an eye between them, until after the negatives
-have been developed, positives printed, and the
-strips spliced together in the cutting and joining room.</p>
-
-<p>In other words, neither the scenario writer nor the
-motion picture director can ever know definitely in
-advance just what the finished work will look like to
-us in the theater. If we are aware of these handicaps,
-it may help us to understand why ugliness so often
-slips through to the screen, but it will not permit us
-to tolerate that ugliness. We, as spectators and critics,
-must forever insist that the photoplay makers master
-their art, no matter how difficult the mastery may be.</p>
-
-<p>It was held some years ago that the only thing the
-matter with the movies was that the stories were badly
-composed and of little originality. Hence, a number
-of prominent novelists and playwrights were hired to<span class="pagenum" id="Page_24">24</span>
-adapt their own literary work or prepare new stories
-for the screen. But these literary men were among
-the first to discover that better <em>writing</em> does not in itself
-guarantee better <em>pictures</em>. It is the director who
-is more truly the picture maker than any one of his
-collaborators in the work. Ideally, he should prepare
-his own scenario, just as the painter makes his own
-preliminary sketches, and the fiction writer makes his
-own first draught of a story. Ideally, too, the plot
-should be devised by the director (who might then
-truly be called a cinema composer), devised especially
-for motion pictures, and with peculiar qualities and
-appeals that could never so well be expressed in other
-mediums.</p>
-
-<p>But that is an ideal to be dreamed of. And, meanwhile,
-we “movie fans” can enjoy the best that is
-being produced by collaborative methods, and we can
-help toward the achievement of still better things by
-developing a thorough appreciation of what is pictorially
-pleasing, at the same time that we train ourselves
-to detect and talk out of existence the common faults
-of the movies.</p>
-
-<hr />
-
-<div id="toclink_25" class="chapter">
-<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_25">25</span></p>
-
-<h2 class="nobreak" id="CHAPTER_III">CHAPTER III<br />
-
-<span class="subhead">EYE TESTS FOR BEAUTY</span></h2>
-</div>
-
-<p class="in0"><span class="firstword">Do the</span> movies hurt your eyes? Some say “yes” and
-some say “no.” Why is it that photoplay scenes sometimes
-flash and dazzle, but have neither radiance nor
-sparkle? Why is it that the motions sometimes shown
-on the screen get “on your nerves”? Why is it that
-you look at so much on the screen and remember so
-little? These questions can be answered by making
-certain eye tests for beauty, and, having answered
-them, we may proceed to a detailed discussion of pictorial
-composition in a great variety of cases.</p>
-
-<p>In order to understand how the pleasure of pictorial
-beauty comes to a spectator, we must analyze the processes
-of looking and seeing. These processes consist
-partly of eye-work and partly of brain-work. That
-is, the physical eye must do certain work before the
-brain gets the visual image. Now if the physical eye
-has to work too hard, or bear a sudden strain, or
-undergo excessive wear, it will not function well; and,
-consequently, the brain will have to work harder in
-order to grasp the picture. All this causes displeasure,
-and displeasure is in conflict with beauty.</p>
-
-<p>Let us state, once for all, that motion pictures need
-never hurt the eyes—quite the contrary. Yet we have<span class="pagenum" id="Page_26">26</span>
-often seen photoplays that did hurt the eyes. Some
-of the reasons for this will be given in the following
-paragraphs.</p>
-
-<p>A familiar operation of the physical eye is the contraction
-and dilation of the pupil. We know from
-childhood that the pupil grows large when the light is
-weak, and small when the light is strong. We also
-know that the eye cannot make this adjustment instantly.
-If a strong light is suddenly flashed on us,
-for example, when we lie awake in a dark room it
-dazzles us, because our pupils are adjusted for darkness;
-it even hurts so much that we defend ourselves
-by closing the eyelids.</p>
-
-<p>In exactly the same way our eyes are shocked by
-the movies when a dazzling white light is flashed on
-the screen where a somewhat darkened scene has just
-vanished. The pupil is caught unawares, is not instantly
-able to protect the eye, and, besides, must use
-up a certain amount of energy in adapting itself to
-the new condition. Such a shock once or twice during
-the evening might easily be forgiven and forgotten,
-might, in fact, be hardly felt at the time; but fifty such
-shocks in a five-reel photoplay would certainly weary
-the eye, and a play of that sort could hardly be called
-beautiful.</p>
-
-<p>The fault which we have just named lies in the
-joining of scenes. But it is not, as a rule, necessary
-to connect scenes or sections of a film so that there is
-a jump from the darkest dark to the whitest white,
-or vice versa. This can be avoided, of course, by the
-device of “fading out” one scene and “fading in” the
-next, which gives the eye time to adapt itself, or by
-“fading down” or “up” just far enough to match the<span class="pagenum" id="Page_27">27</span>
-exact tone of the next picture. The shock can also
-be avoided by joining various sections of the film in
-a series of steps of increasing brightness or darkness.</p>
-
-<p>The eye is hurt, we have said, by a sharp succession
-of black and white. It is also hurt by a sharp
-contrast of whites and blacks lying side by side on the
-screen. Such extremes are avoided in paintings. The
-next time you are in an art museum please compare
-the brightest white in any portrait with the white of
-your cuff, or your handkerchief, or a piece of paper.
-You may be surprised to discover that the high light
-in that painting is not severely white. It is rather
-grayish or yellowish, soft and easy to the eye. Observe
-also that the darkest hue in that painting is far
-from the deepest possible black. The extremes of tone
-are, in fact, never very far apart, and are therefore
-easily grasped by the eye without undue strain.</p>
-
-<p>And while you are thinking of this practice of
-painters, you might compare it with the similar practice
-of composers of music. Your piano has many
-keys, the highest one in the treble being extremely
-far from the lowest one in the bass. Yet if you examine
-the score of any single piece of music you will
-discover that the highest note in that piece is not so
-very far from the lowest note in the same piece. It
-might have been possible to use the entire keyboard,
-but the composer has been wise enough not to try it.
-His extreme notes are so near together that the ear
-is able to catch them and all the subtle values of the
-music in between, without being strained by the effort.</p>
-
-<p>It seems, therefore, that in artistic matters moderation
-is a good thing, is, in fact, necessary to produce
-real beauty. But moderation in the movies is not yet<span class="pagenum" id="Page_28">28</span>
-a widely accepted gospel. Too often we find that the
-dazzling flood of rays from a strong searchlight
-blazes over several square yards of the silver screen,
-while at the same moment, on adjoining parts of the
-same screen hang the deep shades of night. The contrasts
-are sharp as lightning, not only in the scenes,
-but also in the sub-titles which are cut in between.
-Our eyes gaze and twitch and hurt, until it is a real
-relief to step out and rest them upon something comparatively
-moderate, like the electric signs on Broadway.</p>
-
-<p>If there were some mechanical difficulty which made
-this clashing effect of the motion pictures necessary,
-we could never hope for beauty on the screen; for
-no art can achieve beauty by producing pain. But we
-know from the work of such directors as James Cruze,
-D. W. Griffith, Allan Dwan, Rex Ingram, and John
-Robertson, that the moving picture camera is capable
-of recording light gray and dark gray, as well as steel
-white and ebony. They have shown us that it is possible
-to produce sub-titles with light gray lettering
-against a dark gray ground, and that such a combination
-of tones is pleasing to the eye. They have shown
-us that it is possible to screen a lady of the fairest
-face and dressed in the snowiest gown so as to bring
-out the softest tones of light and shade, yet show
-nothing as dazzling as snow and nothing as black as
-ebony.</p>
-
-<div id="if_i_028a" class="figcenter" style="max-width: 27em;">
- <img src="images/i_028a.jpg" width="1710" height="1335" alt="" />
- <div class="caption">From <i>The Spell of the Yukon</i>. An interesting example of <em>chiaroscuro</em>
-and the harmonizing of dramatic pantomime with pictorial pattern.
-The composition, however, is slightly marred by over-emphasis
-on the window. See <a href="#Page_55">pages 55</a> and <a href="#Page_63">63</a>.</div></div>
-
-<div id="if_i_028b" class="figcenter" style="max-width: 28em;">
- <img src="images/i_028b.png" width="1779" height="1364" alt="" />
- <div class="caption">A study of the “still” shown above, illustrating a simple method
-of analyzing pictorial composition. See <a href="#Page_63">page 63</a>.</div></div>
-
-<p>Some of the “stills” in this book give a hint of the
-sharp contrasts in the inferior films, but it is only a
-hint, because the white portions in those illustrations
-can be no whiter than the paper of the page, which is
-dull in comparison with the blaze on the screen. The<span class="pagenum" id="Page_29">29</span>
-movie theater is the best place to verify the theories
-which we are here trying to explain in words. Go to
-the movies. Whenever you find that you enjoy the
-films thoroughly, then by all means do not stop to
-analyze or criticise. If you enjoy any particular film
-so much that you are sure you would like to see it two
-or three times every year for the rest of your life,
-you may be happy, for you have discovered one of
-the classics of the screen. Do not analyze that film
-either, unless you are in the business of making pictures.
-But if a film makes you uncomfortable, or if
-it is so bad that you are quite disgusted with it, then,
-though you must become a martyr to do it, please stay
-and see it again. Compare the good parts of the film,
-if there are any, with the bad parts; study it in detail
-until you see where the trouble lies. And when you
-have discovered the real causes of ugliness in that
-film, wouldn’t it be a public service to express your
-opinion in such a way that the manager of your theater
-might hear it?</p>
-
-<p>Thus far in this chapter we have discussed only a
-single operation of the eye, namely, the expanding and
-contracting of the pupils under the effect of darkness
-and brightness, but it is easy to understand now how
-such an apparently slight thing may seriously affect
-our enjoyment of the movies. Let the reader, when
-he is next displeased by a picture, test it for sharpness
-of contrast between white and black. He will
-probably not have to seek further for explanation of
-its ugliness.</p>
-
-<p>Another operation which the eye-machine performs
-is the accommodation to color. It is somewhat similar
-to the accommodation to distance, which we shall describe,<span class="pagenum" id="Page_30">30</span>
-if the reader will help us by making an experiment.
-Close one eye and look steadily with the other
-at an object across the room. Now, without changing
-your gaze, hold up your finger in line with this
-object and about a foot away from your eye. The
-outline of the finger will be indistinct as long as you
-keep the eye focused on the remote object. Now,
-still keeping one eye shut, look at your finger until
-you can see the little ridges on it. The eye has changed
-its focus, and the remote object is now indistinct.
-What happens is that the lens within the eye changes
-its shape, bulging more for near objects and flattening
-again for distant objects. This work of the eye,
-called accommodation, is done by certain delicate
-muscles. A little of it may be stimulating, but too
-much will make the eyes tired.</p>
-
-<p>Now it is a strange thing that certain colors affect
-the eyes in the same way as distances. Painters knew
-this fact for hundreds of years before the scientists
-were able to explain the reason. They knew that blue
-seemed farther away than red, and arranged the colors
-in their paintings accordingly. All artists have learned
-the trick, even some of our commercial artists, who
-make advertising posters for street cars. Blue makes
-the background fall back; red makes a figure stand
-forward. The reason for this illusion is that when
-the eye looks at red it adjusts itself exactly as if it
-were looking at a near object, and thus deceives the
-brain, so to speak; and when it looks at blue it adjusts
-itself as if it were looking at a distant object and
-again deceives the brain. Or, to state the fact more
-completely, a color from the red end of the color scale
-(red, orange, yellow, green, blue, indigo, violet) seems<span class="pagenum" id="Page_31">31</span>
-nearer to the eye than one from the violet end, even
-though the colors are all placed equally distant from
-the eye.</p>
-
-<p>Now we shall see that, although these effects of
-color are useful in a painting, they may be harmful
-in a motion picture. When we behold a painting in
-which colors ranging from red to yellow are contrasted
-with colors ranging from violet to blue, we
-may, indeed, get a pleasant sensation of the eye because
-of the stimulating activity in the work of
-accommodation. There is to most people a distinct
-pleasure, for example, in shifting the gaze from orange-yellow
-to blue, because those colors are felt to be
-“complementary.” But it must be remembered that
-the circumstances of looking at a painting are entirely
-different from those of looking at a motion picture.</p>
-
-<p>Two differences are especially notable. The first
-difference is that when we look at a painting we ourselves
-are practically the choosers of when and how
-long to look at any spot, line, shape, or color. In
-other words, we ourselves practically decide on how
-much and what kind of work our eyes shall do; but
-when we look at a motion picture we never know at
-any instant what we may be called upon to do the
-next instant. That makes us nervous. We need to
-be constantly braced for the shock and, if we are not
-so braced, we must suffer when the shock comes.</p>
-
-<p>The second difference is that everything in a painting
-is always actually at rest, while nearly everything
-in a motion picture is always in motion. If a painting,
-which does not move in any of its parts, can suggest
-movement to our imagination, or can make our
-eyes perform actual movements of vision, such movements,<span class="pagenum" id="Page_32">32</span>
-actual and imaginary, are pleasantly stimulating.
-The eyes enjoy the natural activity of their
-work, and we feel that there is life in the painting.
-But the motion picture, by its very nature, has as
-much life as it needs. It naturally gives the eyes all
-the work they can stand. Hence, if they need any
-stimulating change at all, it is rather the change from
-movement to repose.</p>
-
-<p>Now let us go to the movie theater. Very likely
-before the show is over we shall be treated to a rapid
-shifting from the blue of some exterior scene in the
-moonlight to the orange-yellowish glow of some interior
-scene in lamplight. Our eyes, therefore, must
-accommodate their lenses to one of these colors again
-and again, only to receive a sudden demand for accommodation
-to the other color. We have no choice
-in the matter except to get up and go out. Our eyes,
-already busy enough, do not need the stimulation of
-any more activity, and our minds, already active
-enough, would prefer the relief of something more
-reposeful.</p>
-
-<p>If the director must have this shifting from blue to
-orange to blue, etc., he might, at least, give us some
-warning, some softening of the shock, so to speak.
-For example, if there is to be a sudden shift from a
-yellowish lamp-light scene to a bluish night scene, a
-hint might be given by attracting our attention to a
-window, through which the blue of night is shown.
-And similarly in a bluish night scene our attention
-might be attracted toward the warm glow from a
-door or window as a warning that the next scene is
-to be flooded with that color. Thus in either case we
-would have a chance to prepare our eyes for the shift,<span class="pagenum" id="Page_33">33</span>
-and we would sense a better continuity of movement.</p>
-
-<p>The subject of color in the movies will be discussed
-again in following chapters. It may be remarked in
-passing that, since color movies are still highly experimental,
-it is only to be expected that mistakes of many
-kinds will be made. Doubtless the leading directors
-can be trusted to learn from experience. Yet it behooves
-us who sit in the theaters to be as disapproving
-of new faults as we are exultant over new beauties.</p>
-
-<p>It is not discouraging to discover a fault, so long
-as we see that it is one which might have been avoided.
-We want to make it plain in this chapter that, although
-the movies sometimes hurt the eyes, it is never due to
-any necessity. It is a fact that pictures on the screen,
-when properly made, are always pleasing to the spectators’
-eyes. And he who does not accept this as a
-fundamental proposition can hardly come by any large
-faith in the future of the photoplay as art.</p>
-
-<p>But we must make a few more eye tests for beauty.
-If you face a wall about twenty feet away, you can,
-without changing the position of your head, look at
-the left side or the right, at the top or bottom, or
-you can look at the four corners of the wall in succession.
-These three different kinds of movements,
-vertical, horizontal, circular, are controlled by as many
-different sets of muscles.</p>
-
-<p>When we look at pictures, especially large pictures,
-these muscles are constantly busy directing our line
-of regard from one point of interest to another; and,
-whether there are definite points of interest or not,
-our eyes will range over the lines and shapes as we
-try to discover what they are meant to represent.</p>
-
-<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_34">34</span></p>
-
-<p>Now a certain amount of eye-movement does not
-hurt the muscles; it is, on the contrary, rather pleasant,
-because their business is to attend to those matters.
-But the eye will become fatigued by a great
-amount of movement, especially when it is forced upon
-us at unexpected moments, just as any other part of
-the body will become fatigued when it is forced to
-perform a great number of sudden, unexpected tasks.</p>
-
-<p>A simple experiment will illustrate this further.
-Suppose that we are sitting in our door-yard, gazing
-across a valley at a group of trees a mile or so away.
-It is more restful to look at those distant trees than at
-a single tree only fifty feet away; and the reason is
-simple. When we look at any object our eyes have
-a tendency to follow its outline. Now, of course, it
-requires more rolling of the eyes to follow the outline
-of a tree near by than one in the distance. This
-rolling movement involves muscular work. And, if
-we look first at the near, large object and then shift
-to the distant, small ones, we immediately experience
-the restfulness of reduced work. There are other reasons
-why distant objects are restful to the eyes, but
-they do not concern us here.</p>
-
-<p>Have you ever noticed the pleasing effect in the
-motion pictures when the thing of interest, say, a train
-or a band of horsemen disappearing in the distance,
-narrows itself down to a small space? All images
-on the screen are, of course, equally distant from the
-spectator; yet there is a sense of restfulness, as we
-have just explained, because the rolling of the eyes
-decreases with the diminishing of the image and its
-area of movement on the screen.</p>
-
-<p>But suddenly there comes a close-up of a face<span class="pagenum" id="Page_35">35</span>
-twenty feet in diameter, and our eyes have to get busy
-in the effort to cover the whole field at once. They
-rove quickly over several square yards of screen until
-that face is completely surveyed and every detail
-noted. Lots of looking! Yes, but that “star” gets
-fifty thousand dollars a month! Can’t fool the camera
-though—crow’s-feet on both sides—fourteen diamonds
-in the left ear-drop <span class="locked">and——</span></p>
-
-<p>Flash to a broad, quiet, soft gray landscape, with
-a lone rider on the horizon—oh, pshaw!—diamonds
-must ’a’ been glass though—anyway, this picture’s
-good for sore eyes—kind o’ easy feelin’—Indian scout
-maybe—or <span class="locked">a——</span></p>
-
-<p>Flash to a close-up of a Mexican bandit, etc., etc.
-And our eyes get busy again mapping out the whole
-subject from hat to hoof, from bridle to tail. Exciting!
-Oh, yes, indeed, and interesting too, but not as
-art; for those little muscles up there are jerked around
-too much, they are working overtime, and soon get
-weary.</p>
-
-<p>“Oh, well, I reckon I can stand the strain,” says
-some heckler, who “don’t quite, you know, get this
-high-brow stuff.” Of course, he can stand it. We
-have stood the mad orchestra of the elevated trains,
-and the riveters, and the neighbor’s parrot for years,
-but we do not call it music.</p>
-
-<p>The difference between noise and harmony is a
-physical difference. If this were not true, no one could
-ever tune your piano. Jarring, clashing, discordant
-sounds displease the ear. Just why noise displeases
-is not for us to say. But we have already explained
-three reasons why bad motion pictures hurt the eyes.
-Let us remember them. First, sudden shifts from<span class="pagenum" id="Page_36">36</span>
-dark to bright pictures shock the eye. Second, sudden
-shifts from a picture in a “cool” tint to another
-in a “warm” tint, and vice versa, over-work the
-eye. Third, a series of quick close-ups or other pictures
-in which the frame is filled with the subject demands
-too much eye-movement.</p>
-
-<p>In the case of the close-up, or any large picture
-where the points of interest are scattered all over the
-field of vision, the eyes, as we have said, become
-strained by too much rolling, a muscular effort which
-is necessary even though the separate points of interest
-may themselves be fixed, as fixed as the four corners
-of the screen itself.</p>
-
-<p>But when the points of interest are moving things,
-as they generally are in the movies, new causes of
-strain often arise. Sometimes the object we are trying
-to look at moves so fast that we can hardly follow
-it. Quick movement is generally desired by the directors
-because they think that briskness, or “pep,”
-makes the dramatic action more intense. Consequently
-people in the movies walk, march, dance, fight, and
-carry on with terrific speed until our eyes become
-tired in the attempt to observe all that is happening.
-The cure for such pictorial hysterics is simple moderation,
-the elimination of jerky movements wherever
-possible, and the choice of movements so easy to follow
-that the eye may perceive them with the least
-muscular effort.</p>
-
-<p>We do not say that you who worship speed shall
-not have your express trains, your racing cars, your
-airplanes, your cow-ponies, and your Arabian steeds.
-You may have them all, because they can be so photographed
-that an actual run of two or three miles may<span class="pagenum" id="Page_37">37</span>
-be presented on the screen as a movement of only
-two or three feet.</p>
-
-<p>We find, too, that there is something pleasing about
-the apparent slowness of actions that are moderated
-by distance. On the far horizon, therefore, the fleetest
-things seem retarded to a stately pace that claims our
-restful gaze. But when a quick movement takes place
-in the foreground of the picture, too near the camera,
-ugliness results, because the demands on the eye-muscles
-are too severe and unexpected. Thus a sudden
-gesture, or the waving branches of trees or bushes,
-or a motor car driving up in front of a house, or
-even such intended grace as the movement in dancing,
-may spoil a picture by being too near the camera.</p>
-
-<p>Another thing which makes close-up movements
-ugly is the flicker, which cannot be entirely eliminated.
-Our readers are doubtless generally aware that what
-we see on the screen is simply the blending of a rapid
-succession of still pictures falling on different spots
-in an order and a direction which gives the appearance
-of motion. If you examine a film you will find
-that there are in fact sixteen little photographs, or
-“frames” to every foot of ribbon. The negative runs
-through the camera, and the positive film through the
-projecting machine, at a rate of about a foot per second.
-Now let us suppose that we have a screen sixteen
-feet long and that we throw upon it a picture of
-a car running at the rate of ten or eleven miles per
-hour. If the picture is a close view the image will
-move across our screen in just one second of time,
-for the speed we have assumed is at the rate of sixteen
-feet per second. But, since there are only sixteen
-frames in that foot, or second, of film, we know<span class="pagenum" id="Page_38">38</span>
-that only sixteen flashes of the car have been thrown
-on the screen during that second. Therefore, whatever
-particular part of the car we are looking at has
-fallen on sixteen different spots of the screen, and
-each spot is just one foot to the side of the previous
-one, because the screen is by assumption just sixteen
-feet wide. Now these separations are so wide that
-the eye cannot help noticing them even in the fraction
-of a second; there is not sufficient blending of images
-to form smooth motion; and the so-called flicker
-results.</p>
-
-<p>However, if the car is photographed going obliquely
-away from us, the entire motion may occupy only a
-small area of the screen, no matter how far or fast
-the car goes; consequently the images fall much closer
-together and the flicker becomes so slight that we
-scarcely notice it. Also, since the field of movement
-is smaller in extent, the rolling of our eyes in ranging
-over the subject is less, and the fatigue of the
-muscles is so slight that we scarcely notice that either.</p>
-
-<p>We have been arguing that large violent movements
-on the screen hurt the eyes, and we hope that our
-readers agree with us. But if any one is doubtful we
-invite him to make the following test. Go to any
-movie theater and sit down in the seventh or eighth
-row. Then after having seen about half of the picture,
-move back to the last row, or stand behind the
-last row. The picture will immediately seem more
-restful to the eyes, because the distance has made the
-screen seem smaller and the motions slower, two
-changes which, of course, make less work for the eyes.
-Now stay in the new position until the program is
-finished, and then see that part of the picture which<span class="pagenum" id="Page_39">39</span>
-was at first seen from the front seat. It will appear
-much more pleasing to the eye than it did the first
-time.</p>
-
-<div id="if_i_039a" class="figcenter" style="max-width: 21em;">
- <img src="images/i_039a.jpg" width="1323" height="1661" alt="" />
- <div class="caption"><i>Daylight and Lamplight</i>, a painting by William McGregor.
-The design illustrates artistic balance and
-rhythm. See <a href="#Page_41">pages 41</a> and <a href="#Page_77">77</a>.</div></div>
-
-<div id="if_i_039b" class="figcenter" style="max-width: 18em;">
- <img src="images/i_039b.png" width="1125" height="1381" alt="" />
- <div class="caption">A study of lines to illustrate the value of
-repetition within a pattern. See <a href="#Page_40">page 40</a>.</div></div>
-
-<p>But we cannot all sit in the back row of a theater,
-and besides, even when screen motions are reasonably
-slow and limited, they may still fail to produce the
-effect of beauty.</p>
-
-<p>Now, before we go further into this discussion of
-beauty on the screen, let us recall, that, as we have
-already said, the process of vision is partly eye-work
-and partly brain-work. These two factors are so
-closely connected in fact, that scientists cannot definitely
-separate them.<a id="FNanchor_2" href="#Footnote_2" class="fnanchor">B</a></p>
-
-<div class="footnote">
-
-<p><a id="Footnote_2" href="#FNanchor_2" class="fnanchor">B</a> If any of our readers are especially interested in the details of
-physiological and psychological experiments in vision which are
-made by experts, they should read Chapter III in Hugo Muensterberg’s
-“The Photoplay,” and should consult the current numbers
-and the volumes for the last five or six years of the “Psychological
-Review,” the “American Journal of Psychology,” the
-“Journal of Experimental Psychology,” and other similar periodicals,
-which are available in any large library.</p>
-
-</div>
-
-<p>From the results published in scientific periodicals
-it may be learned that visible ugliness does not always
-make the physical work of the eye more difficult. This
-is not to contradict what we have already said in this
-chapter, but merely to state that there may be certain
-kinds of ugliness on the screen which apparently do
-not hurt the eye at all. And yet ugliness does affect
-the mental phase of vision. It will be worth while
-giving a page or more to the testing of this statement;
-and the discussion may lead to a useful definition to
-keep in mind when criticizing the movies.</p>
-
-<p>Curiously enough, the muscular movement of the
-eye when ranging over a single jagged, irregular line
-is practically the same as when ranging over a graceful<span class="pagenum" id="Page_40">40</span>
-line of similar length and direction. Scientific experiment
-shows that we move our eye-balls in a jerky,
-irregular manner, even when we view the most graceful
-line that can be drawn. Yet it is commonly said by
-all of us that one line delights the eye and the other
-does not. Evidently, therefore, the difference must
-lie in that function of seeing which the brain performs.
-But the brain, too, is a physical organ. It, too, can
-become fatigued, and it finds certain kinds of work
-less fatiguing than others.</p>
-
-<p>Psychologists have suggested that a graceful line
-is pleasant to look at because the regularity and
-smoothness of its changes in direction make it easily
-perceived as a complete unity. Thus in the diagram
-facing <a href="#Page_39">page 39</a>, lines A and B are pleasanter to look
-at than lines C and D, because their character as lines
-can be grasped by the mind more quickly and more
-easily than the character of C or D. And, for the
-same reason, lines A and B taken together make a more
-pleasing combination than lines B and C or lines C
-and D.</p>
-
-<p>Now, if you will shut the book and try to draw any
-one of these four lines, even in your imagination, you
-will discover that you remember A and B almost perfectly,
-while you can hardly remember a single part
-of either C or D. This proves that in your own case
-the business of seeing has been more successful with
-graceful lines than with ugly ones. And, of course,
-successful effort is always more pleasing than failure.</p>
-
-<p>Our working definition of good pictorial composition,
-offered in the preceding chapter, may be adapted
-here. Let us put it this way: A beautiful line or
-combination of lines is one in which we can see and<span class="pagenum" id="Page_41">41</span>
-feel much with ease, while an ugly line or combination
-is one in which we cannot see or feel much except
-with great difficulty. The terms “ease” and “difficulty”
-apply both to eye-work and brain-work.</p>
-
-<p>One reason why we see <em>much with ease</em> in a beautiful
-line is evidently that any one part of the whole is
-a kind of key to some adjoining or corresponding
-part. Thus in line A the lower curve is very similar
-to the upper curve and leads into it with the smoothest
-continuity. And this same lower curve of A is so
-similar to the lower curve of B that we can see instantly
-the balanced relation between them. In ugly
-lines, on the other hand, there are no such visual helps.
-Yet, if some kind of balance or repetition is adopted,
-it may be that lines which are ugly when considered
-singly take on a kind of beauty or interestingness when
-considered as a group. Thus lines E, F, and G, are
-not as pleasing when standing alone as they become
-when considered in relation to a similar line symmetrically
-placed. Therefore, the combinations EF or
-FG, or even EFG are more pleasing than any one of
-their parts.</p>
-
-<p>Now let us apply these principles of continuity and
-repetition to the lines in a picture. If you turn to
-Paxton’s “Daylight and Lamplight,” facing <a href="#Page_39">page 39</a>,
-you will observe instantly the beautifully curving line
-of the woman’s back and also a balancing line down
-the side of the urn. That sweep of line gives at once
-the key to the arrangement of the picture.<a id="FNanchor_3" href="#Footnote_3" class="fnanchor">C</a> In other
-words, you can see much of that picture with ease,<span class="pagenum" id="Page_42">42</span>
-even in a glance. Now if you examine this picture
-more in detail you will find much continuity of line
-and many parallelisms of line and shape, all of which
-tend to make the arrangement simple, without reducing
-any of the actual contents of the picture.</p>
-
-<div class="footnote">
-
-<p><a id="Footnote_3" href="#FNanchor_3" class="fnanchor">C</a> Out of fairness to the painter it must be added that this
-canvas, as the title indicates, is also a study in the balancing of
-cool and warm colors.</p>
-
-</div>
-
-<p>The “much” which we can see in a beautiful line includes
-such things as its meaning or use in the picture,
-its fitness for that use, its power to suggest associations,
-its interestingness, etc. But we shall not take
-up those phases of beauty in this chapter; we are now
-merely arguing that pictorial beauty economizes the
-work of the eye and brain, while visible ugliness does
-not.</p>
-
-<p>What we said, a moment ago, regarding the value
-of continuity and repetition in fixed lines may also be
-applied to moving lines and objects. The great appeal
-of the screen lies in the showing of vivid movement,
-the flow of forms, the subtle weaving, through soft
-play of light and shadow, of fanciful figures that melt
-like music while we gaze, and yet remain in our minds
-like curves of a strange melody. When such glimpses
-of beauty come, our eyes and brains surely do not feel
-any friction or strain in the process of looking. But
-when ugly motions are presented the eye must perform
-excessive movement, and the brain must exert excessive
-effort.</p>
-
-<p>What is an ugly motion? To answer this we must
-observe one or two facts concerning the visual process
-of seeing motions. We must admit the fact that one
-can perceive the motion of an object without following
-it with the eyes. Any one can test this for himself
-by fixing his eyes steadily on some spot on the wall.
-Without shifting his glance he may have knowledge<span class="pagenum" id="Page_43">43</span>
-of motions going on at other places many feet away
-from that spot. But it is also a fact that he will
-immediately feel an inclination to shift his eyes in
-order to see any one of these motions more clearly.
-In making that shift he will, of course, have to move
-his eyeballs. Now, if that moving object changes its
-place, his eyeballs will continue to make the movements
-necessary to follow it. And, if the attention continues
-directed toward that object, his eyes will have
-to make great or small movements, according as the
-object makes a great or small change of place.</p>
-
-<p>An interesting theory, which scientific tests support,
-is that, although the eye has to make a series of
-irregular, jerky movements when following any moving
-object, these movements become fewer and smaller
-as the smoothness and regularity of the observed
-motion increases.</p>
-
-<p>What we have just said about eye movement explains,
-at least partly, why the aimless crawling of a
-house fly over a window pane is ugly, while the graceful
-flying of a sea gull is beautiful; why the clambering
-of a monkey is ugly, while the swimming of a fish
-is graceful, and why the zigzag falling of a sheet of
-paper thrown from a window is displeasing, while the
-smooth spiralling of an airplane is pleasing.</p>
-
-<p>In some of the movements which we classify as
-beautiful, it is clear that the principle of repetition
-is at work, which, as we have said, makes seeing
-easy. Any task accomplished once and undertaken
-again becomes easier and easier with repetition. We
-have already shown how this makes the perception of
-rhythmical fixed lines or balanced composition of
-fixed lines easier for the mind, if not for the eye itself.<span class="pagenum" id="Page_44">44</span>
-A similar experience of ease comes from viewing
-rhythmical or balanced motions.</p>
-
-<p>You would not enjoy watching a dancer whose
-every movement was entirely unlike every previous
-movement. The effect would be utter confusion.
-You could not grasp, could not remember, what you
-saw. And you would probably say that it was not
-dancing at all. On the contrary, the beauty of a dance
-is largely due to the frequent repetitions or similarities
-of movements. Again and again you see and
-enjoy the same flexing of knee and poising of foot,
-the same curving of back and tossing of head, the
-same sweeping of hand and floating of drapery; and
-again and again the dancer moves through the same
-path of circling lines. Yet in these repetitions there
-are slight variations, too, because no human being
-works with the precision of a machine. And as you
-watch the dance you get variety without multiplicity;
-you see much with ease.</p>
-
-<p>“Now, look here,” cuts in some old-time producer,
-“you don’t mean to say that you want our actors to
-dance through a drama, do you—a murder scene, or
-a wedding, or a meeting of profiteers to raise the
-price of soap?” No, indeed, we do not. In fact, we
-are hardly thinking of them as actors at all—not in
-this chapter. We are merely thinking of them as
-moving shapes upon a screen. And we want those
-shapes to move about in such a way that the motions
-will not hurt our eyes.</p>
-
-<p>If we study those films that please us most we shall
-discover easy continuity of movement, so that a path
-of motion described in any one scene is extended, as it
-were, into a similar path of motion in the following
-scene. In such motion pictures there may be shifts, but<span class="pagenum" id="Page_45">45</span>
-there are no breaks. Paths of motion on the screen
-can remain long in our memories, as though they
-were fixed lines in a picture. Clearly, therefore, it
-would not be pleasing to have these remembered lines
-of motion clashing with those which are being perceived.</p>
-
-<div id="if_i_045" class="figcenter" style="max-width: 32em;">
- <img src="images/i_045.jpg" width="2008" height="1650" alt="" />
- <div class="caption">From <i>Audrey</i>. Cover up the left half of this picture and the lower half of the
-remaining part, and the quarter which then remains will contain a more pleasing
-and dramatic composition than that of the view taken as a whole. See <a href="#Page_53">pages 53</a>
-and <a href="#Page_71">71</a>.</div></div>
-
-<p>So much for the optical effects of single motions
-coming in succession. Now we must advance to the
-consideration of several motions going on in various
-directions during the same moment, which is a more
-usual situation in the photoplay. Several motions at
-once may constitute a harmony or a jumble, according
-to the first demands which they make upon the
-eye-work and brain-work of vision.</p>
-
-<p>The difference between visual harmony and disharmony
-seems to depend partly on the fact that a
-pair of human eyes work together as one, and not
-as two separate instruments. You cannot look up
-with one eye and down with the other; you cannot
-look to the left with one eye and to the right with
-the other; you cannot look at a distant object with
-one eye and at a near one with the other. Hence, if
-you try to look intently at two or more objects crossing
-each other in opposite directions, your eyes are
-baffled and the effect is not pleasurable. There is
-also a conflict in our mental work of seeing, when
-opposing motions try to claim equal attention at the
-same time, unless, as we have previously stated, these
-motions are in some kind of rhythmical balance with
-each other.</p>
-
-<p>Because of this baffling of eye and brain, therefore,
-we are displeased by the sight of two automobiles<span class="pagenum" id="Page_46">46</span>
-passing each other in opposite directions, or by the
-crossing of an actor’s gestures with the spoke of a
-wheel or the twig of a tree. A particularly ugly
-crossing is that of false and real motion, which even
-some of the best directors still indulge in. False, or
-apparent, motion occurs when the camera itself has
-been moving about while the picture was being taken.
-Thus a road is made to shoot upwards over the screen
-while our hero is riding madly toward us, or a parlor
-slides drunkenly to one side while some fair lady
-marches toward a door, or a stairway becomes a waterfall
-which she swims upstairs. The real motion, of
-course, contains the dramatic interest, but the false
-motion forces itself upon us by its novelty or unexpectedness;
-it becomes difficult for us to see much
-with ease, and the result is ugliness.</p>
-
-<p>A particularly annoying device of recent vogue is
-the sub-title insert which is decorated with symbolical
-motions. It forces the spectator to read words and
-look at motions at the same time and upon the same
-spot of the screen. The Metro interpretation of the
-“Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse,” beautiful in its
-photographed scenes, was spoiled by much ugliness
-of that kind. In one sub-title we must look at the
-Beast snorting and chopping his long jaws, while
-several lines of type are spread over his horrible
-movements. In others we see water flowing from
-the bottom of the screen toward the top, or we see
-a pin-wheel of sparks, to represent telegraphic messages
-going around the world, or we see a squirrel
-in his wheel-cage, to represent something or other,
-and in each of these cases we must also read words
-in glaring type blazed on top of the moving symbols.</p>
-
-<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_47">47</span></p>
-
-<p>Oppositions and conflicts baffle and bewilder the
-eye and mind, but concurrent co-operating motions
-please them. It is easy, for example, to look at the
-shower of fire from a sky rocket, because the lines
-move in similar directions and remain comparatively
-near together, each one, as it were, helping the others,
-so that what we see in one part of the motion is a key
-to the rest of the motion. There is a similar unity
-and rhythmical balance in the motion of a flock of
-birds, a school of fish, or a group of dancers, the
-billows of the sea, or the feathery fall of snowflakes.</p>
-
-<p>The production of harmonious motions in a photoplay
-might seem to us spectators to be merely a matter
-of spying with a camera and catching views of
-harmonious actions and settings. But the problem is
-not so simple. For the movements within any given
-scene may be perfectly orchestrated with respect to
-each other, and yet may clash with every one of the
-movements in the following scene. If in one picture
-our eyes and minds have adjusted themselves to the
-delicate threading of snow-flakes, falling like a softly
-changing tapestry, they can only be shocked by a sudden
-jump to the vigorous curling of a sea wave breaking
-on the beach. And in our natural desire to appreciate
-both subjects at once we are disappointed to find
-that each has spoiled the other. Delicacy looks at
-power and thinks it violence; power looks at delicacy
-and thinks it weakness. It is a visual effect such as
-one would get from a drawing where the hair lines of
-the finest pen and thinnest ink were crossed by the
-coarse marks of a blunt piece of charcoal.</p>
-
-<p>So sharp a contrast might have a certain dramatic,
-stirring effect, like the use of swear words in a<span class="pagenum" id="Page_48">48</span>
-prayer; the very hurt might bring a certain thrill.
-An original and ingenious man, Mr. Griffith, for instance,
-may choose to show us a close-up of a little
-girl smiling in wistful innocence, her pretty curls
-quivering in the light breeze, contrasted suddenly with
-a reeking flood of soldiers pouring into a city street.
-Striking? Yes, exactly. The device is so striking
-that Mr. Griffith himself has learned to use it with
-restraint. Because once upon a time he composed
-a photoplay called “Intolerance,” which was so full
-of striking contrasts that it failed. There were only
-a few thousand people in the world who could stand
-the strain of looking at it.</p>
-
-<p>Thus as we analyze the optical aspects of a motion
-picture we are amazed at the number of things that
-may conspire to hurt our eyes, and we sympathize
-more than ever with the sincere cinema composer.
-He, the new hope of the movies, feels the need of
-other equipment than a line of talk and a megaphone.
-He no longer applies for a position in a studio on
-the strength of his record as an actor, as a stage director,
-as a city editor, as a college cheer leader, or as
-a drill sergeant in the army. He has begun to think
-in pictorial composition and not in words. He is
-never without his sketching pad and piece of charcoal,
-because, forsooth, his business is picture making. He
-makes hundreds of sketches by day, of shapes, and
-lines, and tones, and he goes over them again and
-changes them by night. His scenario contains almost
-as many drawings as words. He knows before he
-says “Good morning” to his queens and cut-throats
-just what places and spaces their figures will occupy
-during the pictorial climaxes, as well as during the<span class="pagenum" id="Page_49">49</span>
-movements to, and away from, those climaxes. He
-sits among miles of films which he cuts, joins, runs
-through his projecting machine, and cuts and joins
-again. He knows that pictorial beauty does not come
-to the screen merely because the camera itself is a
-wonderful instrument. He knows, what so many
-critics are beginning to discover, that “the photography”
-may be excellent in a film, while its pictorial
-composition is atrocious. He knows first and last and
-always that, unless he makes his photoplay fundamentally
-pleasing to the eyes of the spectator, he can
-never give it the magic power of graphic art.</p>
-
-<hr />
-
-<div id="toclink_50" class="chapter">
-<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_50">50</span></p>
-
-<h2 class="nobreak" id="CHAPTER_IV">CHAPTER IV<br />
-
-<span class="subhead">PICTORIAL FORCE IN FIXED PATTERNS</span></h2>
-</div>
-
-<p class="in0"><span class="firstword">Frequently</span> while a director is rehearsing a photoplay
-scene he will sing out the command, “Hold it!”
-indicating thereby that the player has struck an attitude,
-or the players have woven themselves into a
-pattern, which is so expressive and beautiful that it
-deserves to be held for several seconds. What the
-camera then records will be shown on the screen as
-a striking pictorial moment, and, while it lasts, will
-appear as fixed as a painting.</p>
-
-<p>But it is a peculiar psychological fact that such pictorial
-moments seem to occur in every movement,
-whether the actors have paused or not, the spectator
-seeing and remembering these arrested moments as
-though they were fixed pictures. This peculiar fact,
-that we remember fixed moments among continuous
-movements, has been discussed at some length in
-Chapter III of “The Art of Photoplay Making,” and
-will, therefore, not be dwelt upon here. However,
-a single example may illustrate what we mean. Suppose
-we watch a diver stepping out upon a high springboard
-and diving into a pool. The whole feat is, of
-course, a movement without pause from beginning
-to end; yet our eyes will somehow arrest one moment
-as the most interesting, the most pictorial. It may
-be the moment when the diver is about midway between<span class="pagenum" id="Page_51">51</span>
-the springboard and the water, a moment when
-the body seems to float strangely upon the air. We
-are not unaware of the other phases of the dive, yet
-this particular moment impresses us; to it we apply
-our fine appraisal of form.</p>
-
-<p>Similarly in a motion picture theater we unconsciously
-select moments from the action before us.
-These fleeting moments which fix themselves, so to
-speak, demand practically the same work (or shall we
-call it play?) from our eyes and minds as the momentarily
-fixed pictures which the director sometimes demands.
-At such times the whole pattern on the screen
-becomes as static as a painting, and its power or weakness,
-its beauty or lack of beauty, may be appreciated
-much as one would appreciate a design in a painting.</p>
-
-<p>A painting enchants the beholder, not only by its
-color, but also by its lines and pattern. The peculiar
-power which resides in the arrangement of lines and
-masses has been studied by art critics for hundreds
-of years, and many of the principles which they have
-discovered might well be recalled by us in judging
-those moments of a motion picture which may be
-viewed as fixed designs. And what we learn by making
-such applications will help us greatly toward a
-better understanding of the beauty of pictorial
-motions on the screen.</p>
-
-<p>By what visual processes do we grasp the meaning
-of a picture? What happens when we first look at
-the picture? And what happens as we continue looking?
-The answers, as nearly as can be ascertained,
-are as follows. When we face a picture our eyes
-first glance at some spot or region which is more
-attractive than all others, and then proceed to explore<span class="pagenum" id="Page_52">52</span>
-the whole picture, ranging over all of its parts, and
-returning again to the center of attraction. In certain
-compositions this whole tour of inspection may
-be accomplished in one trip, and may be repeated
-at will, while in other compositions the inspection may
-require various side trips away from the center of
-interest to the outlying districts and back again. Of
-course, we are not aware that our eyes are doing all
-these things when we are at the movies, but that is
-what happens, just the same.</p>
-
-<p>These visual processes take place in an exceedingly
-short time, usually only a fraction of a second, but
-they are real physical processes, nevertheless, subject
-to the laws of physical comfort and fatigue, and capable
-of being tested by the ordinary laws of physical
-efficiency.</p>
-
-<p>Perhaps the first test, in this hectic age of ours,
-is speed. The quicker we can see and interpret a
-thing after we begin looking at it, the more satisfied
-we are. Another test is ease, or freedom from
-fatigue. The less energy we expend in looking, the
-more pleased we are. Hence, if the several parts of
-a picture can be quickly and easily seen and related
-to each other, the picture as a whole may be considered
-beautiful, providing it satisfies certain other
-demands, which will be analyzed later on.</p>
-
-<p>Now suppose that we are at the movies and that
-some pictorial moment from the flowing action is
-arrested in our minds. If we are critical and feel like
-analyzing the effect of that arrested moment we may
-well ask such questions as the following:</p>
-
-<p>What portion of that picture did we look at first,
-and why? Was that the spot which the cinema composer<span class="pagenum" id="Page_53">53</span>
-desired us to see first? If not, how did he
-happen to mislead us and waste our time?</p>
-
-<p>Where did our glances wander as we continued
-looking at the picture? Did they follow the lines
-which the cinema composer had mapped out? If not,
-what is wrong with his plan?</p>
-
-<p>What part of the picture remains longest in memory?
-Does it coincide with the dramatic emphasis
-intended by the composer? If not, what caused the
-wrong accent?</p>
-
-<p>Was the picture as a whole really beautiful to the
-eyes? If not, what made it displeasing?</p>
-
-<p>Beginning with the first question, we may say that
-the attracting power of any portion of a picture depends
-upon many circumstances and conditions. For
-example, a patch of white on an area of dark will
-attract the eye, because it is natural for the eye to
-seek light in preference to dark. Hence, in the “still”
-from “Audrey” on <a href="#Page_45">page 45</a> we see the woman first;
-then we see the tree trunks, the reflections in the
-water, and the person half hidden in the bushes to
-the left. It is also natural for the eye to catch and
-follow the longest line in a composition. Therefore
-the trunk of the fallen tree in this picture helps to
-lead the eye to the woman. It is, furthermore, natural
-for the eye to follow two or more lines to a point
-where they meet. Therefore this picture would have
-given more emphasis to the woman if she had been
-placed near the root of the tree trunk, where many
-lines converge.</p>
-
-<p>The spectator in the theater should be enabled to
-see the central interest at the very first instant of
-projection. Hence when the picture is being taken,<span class="pagenum" id="Page_54">54</span>
-all lines of indication, gesture, draperies, etc., should
-be set, before the camera begins “shooting,” and these
-lines should connect up with the paths of previously
-moving objects, so that the spectator’s eyes may sweep
-at once to the central interest.</p>
-
-<p>The need of this may be illustrated by a horrible
-example. Let us turn to the “still” on <a href="#Page_55">page 55</a>. It
-is a safe bet that every one who looks at this picture
-will first see a long diagonal pole, one of the supports
-of the swing, because that is the longest, most
-striking line of the picture. The poles leaning together
-and the converging chains, though of no dramatic
-importance whatsoever, attract immediate attention
-to themselves, and also carry the eye to the two
-standing girls; which is clearly a mistake in composition,
-for the real interest evidently lies in the facial
-expressions of the man and woman, who are conversing
-with each other.</p>
-
-<p>Students of pictorial design have discovered that,
-of all converging lines in a drawing, those which
-meet at right angles usually attract the eyes most
-strongly. Now if we look again at the “still” under
-discussion we will observe that there are many square
-corners in its composition, but that none of these
-angles coincide with any interest deserving of pictorial
-emphasis. Two of the strongest accents are at
-the square corners where the long pole and the brick
-curbing meet. Yet there is certainly no very exciting
-interest in that region. Hence our eyes wander thither
-in vain.</p>
-
-<p>Let us speculate for a moment on what would
-happen to this composition if we remove the diagonal
-poles, chains, etc., and turn the swing into a seat.<span class="pagenum" id="Page_55">55</span>
-The figures, even as they stand, would then form a
-not unpleasing rhythm, and the line of heads, with
-expressions helping to give direction, would lead to
-the heroine.</p>
-
-<div id="if_i_055a" class="figcenter" style="max-width: 24em;">
- <img src="images/i_055a.jpg" width="1534" height="1254" alt="" />
- <div class="caption">This “still” illustrates misplaced emphasis and several other
-defects in pictorial composition which characterized the general
-run of movies a few years ago. See <a href="#Page_54">page 54</a>.</div></div>
-
-<div id="if_i_055b" class="figcenter" style="max-width: 24em;">
- <img src="images/i_055b.jpg" width="1532" height="1338" alt="" />
- <div class="caption">A specimen of bad composition, from an old film. The window
-is emphasized by its curious shape, by its central position,
-by its strong contrasts of black and white, and by the woman’s
-gesture; yet this window has no dramatic significance whatsoever
-in the scene. See <a href="#Page_55">page 55</a>.</div></div>
-
-<p>A glaring example of wrong emphasis caused by
-the attraction of a right-angled shape is to be seen in
-a “still” from “Other Men’s Wives,” on opposite page,
-where the window, toward which the woman unconsciously
-points her wand, irresistibly attracts the attention
-of the spectator. Is it not evident from even a
-cursory analysis of these “stills” that, though the
-directors may have given some thought to the poses
-and groupings of the performers, they have failed to
-realize that every other visible thing within scope of
-the camera must also be harmonized with the figures
-in order to keep the dramatic emphasis where it
-belongs?</p>
-
-<p>Keeping in mind what we have just said about the
-visual accents of right angles we turn to a “still”
-from the “Spell of the Yukon,” facing <a href="#Page_28">page 28</a>. The
-window catches our eyes before anything else in the
-picture, both because of its square corners and because
-of its sharp contrasts of black and white.
-Though this distraction may be only for a brief moment,
-it is enough to keep our attention for that
-moment away from the man and boy, set in fine
-atmosphere.</p>
-
-<p>It is only common sense to aim at making the visual
-interest of a picture coincide with the dramatic interest.
-And this can be done by controlling such means
-of attraction as we have just mentioned. When we
-look at the painting entitled “The Shepherdess,” facing
-<a href="#Page_21">page 21</a>, our glance falls immediately upon the shepherdess,<span class="pagenum" id="Page_56">56</span>
-because the almost vertical line of her body
-forms a cross with the horizontal line of the sheep’s
-backs. Yet the design is so subtle that, unless we
-stop to analyze, we do not notice how the painter
-achieves his emphasis. We do not notice that the
-front of the woman’s body is really a continuation
-of the left edge of a tree which extends to the top
-of the frame, that her profile is the continuation of
-a line of foliage from another tree, that her staff
-makes right angles with her throat and with the back
-of her head, that the rhythmical contours of a sheep
-flow into her left hand and arm, and that a shadow
-from the lower center of the picture leads to her
-feet.</p>
-
-<p>If a painter establishes his emphasis so carefully in
-a picture which the beholder may regard for hours
-at a time, it would seem all the more urgent for a
-cinema composer to study out the correct emphasis for
-a pictorial moment which the spectator must grasp
-in only a second or two. It is extremely important,
-for the simple reason that, if the director does not
-deliberately draw the attention of the spectator to the
-dramatic interest in the picture, it is most likely that
-accident will emphasize some other part, as we have
-seen in the examples already discussed; and then,
-before the spectator has time to reason himself away
-from the false emphasis to the true interest, the action
-will go on to some other scene, and a part of the real
-message will be lost.</p>
-
-<div id="if_i_057" class="figcenter" style="max-width: 34em;">
- <img src="images/i_057.jpg" width="2146" height="1664" alt="" />
- <div class="caption">From <i>The Spell of the Yukon</i>. There are too many distracting shapes in the left
-end of this picture. Mask over the cabin, the sleigh, and the two dogs farthest to the
-left, and the remaining part of the picture becomes a pleasing composition of line, shape,
-and tone. See <a href="#Page_56">page 56</a>.</div></div>
-
-<p>Let us illustrate this again by turning to another
-“still” from “The Spell of the Yukon,” facing <a href="#Page_57">page
-57</a>. The thing which attracts first and longest is
-the strange object in the upper left-hand corner. On<span class="pagenum" id="Page_57">57</span>
-the screen our eyes would wander away to the dogs
-and the man, but they would wander back again to
-that strange shape, because it is a law of visual attention
-that the strangest and most unfamiliar shape
-attracts most strongly. We would be curious about
-that shape, and by the time we had decided that it
-was an Alaskan sled, the picture would fade out and
-we would have missed the message, namely the affectionate
-companionship of the man and his dogs.</p>
-
-<p>If the sled had been more completely shown, or
-viewed from a different angle, or placed in a more
-natural position immediately behind a team of dogs,
-it would not have seemed strange and distracting.
-This composition could be greatly improved by simply
-eliminating the left third of it. If you cover up the
-sled and the two dogs nearest it with a sheet of paper
-you will see that what remains is a fairly pleasing
-arrangement, with considerably more emphasis on the
-man and the theme of his affection for the dogs, with
-a better pattern and more rhythmical lines.</p>
-
-<p>If the director had simplified his composition as we
-have suggested he might have eliminated the wrong
-emphasis and secured the right emphasis in one
-stroke. The dark figure of the man framed roughly
-in white and gray would have attracted attention by
-its tonal isolation. Emphasis by isolation involves
-simplicity and economy, and for that very reason,
-perhaps, this device is so often neglected by less experienced
-directors. They breathe the poisonous air of
-extravagance and thrash their arms in the heretical
-belief that multiplicity is power. Compare, for instance,
-the “still” of “Polly of the Circus,” facing
-<a href="#Page_79">page 79</a>, with “The Banquet of the Officers of St.<span class="pagenum" id="Page_58">58</span>
-Andrew,” by Frans Hals, facing <a href="#Page_79">page 79</a>, and you
-get at once the distinct impression that Hals’s picture
-depicts a larger crowd than the “still.” But you will
-be astonished to find that the painting actually contains
-but twelve men, while the “still” contains seventeen
-men, one woman, and one horse.</p>
-
-<p>In the painting every head is isolated by hat, ruff,
-costume, or panel, and seems to have plenty of room
-to move freely without bumping. Our eyes can study
-the contours and values of those heads without colliding
-with other interests. And the fact that each
-head is treated almost as though it were a separate
-portrait might be called a trick of design which makes
-us overestimate the number in the group, thus getting
-the impression of a throng. Surely this is good
-economy. Compare it with the extravagant composition
-of the circus crowd. There you see heads and
-bodies huddled together in a meaningless jumble. No
-interest is significantly framed, no two interests are
-properly spaced. The director may have swelled the
-wage roll, but he has shrivelled the art product. Perhaps
-it is not necessary to go further in support of our
-contention that certain visual values and devices of arrangement
-can be used, separately or in combination,
-to control the glances of spectators, and that, unless
-these means are properly used, pictorial impressiveness
-cannot be obtained. We have discussed the uses of a
-bright patch on a generally dark ground, long converging
-lines, crosses, sharp contrasts of tone and color,
-unfamiliar shapes, and isolation of subject. Scores of
-other principles of design, well known to painters,
-might be used to emphasize a screen picture during that
-moment of the action when all movement seems to have<span class="pagenum" id="Page_59">59</span>
-stopped. Of course, when the movement is actually
-or apparently resumed, emphasis will be controlled according
-to the laws by which motion appeals to the
-eye. But that is a subject for another chapter.</p>
-
-<p>To continue our analysis of fixed design, let us examine
-the methods whereby various pictorial elements
-may be fused into a unity. Every writer knows that
-a sentence is really a train of words which, though
-actually standing still on the paper, can carry the reader’s
-mind swiftly across the page. By various literary
-devices the reader’s interest is caught and carried from
-emphasis to emphasis, and by various devices the
-reader’s thoughts may be organized into a complete
-unity. So, too, the lines and shapes of a picture, however
-still they may stand for the moment on the screen
-have the power to carry the spectator’s eyes from
-interest to interest; and they may, if properly
-designed, guide his attention through the picture in
-such a way as to gather all of its parts into a complete
-unity.</p>
-
-<p>When the eyes are caught by something in a picture,
-they do not at first rest there, but proceed, as we
-have said, on a tour of inspection of the whole area
-within the frame of that picture, after which they return
-again to the first visual interest. In making this
-tour the eyes seek, or at least, follow a pattern. Let
-us test these statements by turning to the “still” facing
-<a href="#Page_61">page 61</a>. You cannot see every point of the picture
-at once. Therefore your eyes range over it. Perhaps,
-now that we call your attention to it, you can feel your
-eyes moving as they follow the outlines of the white
-mass which is produced by the girl’s figure and dress.
-To make sure that you feel these movements, just look<span class="pagenum" id="Page_60">60</span>
-quickly from her head to her foot, to her right hand,
-to her head again, etc. Now you realize that the white
-mass is contained in a distinct triangle. That triangle
-is the pattern of the picture. Whether you like it or
-not makes no difference; the triangular path must be
-followed by your eyes.</p>
-
-<p>This little exercise shows that the eyes, unlike the
-lens of a camera, cannot see every part of a picture at
-once, but must range over it from point to point, repeating
-the tour again and again as long as the picture
-is in view. But, if we cannot see head, hand, and foot
-at once, it is evident that we must remember the head
-while we are observing the hand, that we must remember
-both the head and the hand while we are observing
-the foot, etc., else the whole picture could never be built
-up in our minds. It is also evident that the smoother
-the path, the more easily and quickly can the tour of
-inspection be made.</p>
-
-<p>The eye needs paths, finger-posts, and bridges to
-carry it from one part of a picture to another, a need
-which painters discovered ages ago, and responded to
-by uniting the lines of their drawings into some sort
-of image or design. Thus the old masters often constructed
-their paintings on the design of a circle, a rectangle,
-a triangle, a diamond, a right-angled cross, an
-X shape, an S curve, or some other equally simple pattern,
-finding by experience that this practice always
-helped the beholder to grasp the picture as a unity. But
-they were real magicians, those medieval masters, and
-as such knew how to conceal their designs. Their technique,
-which the probing critic lays bare, is neither seen
-nor suspected by the average beholder who stands
-worshipful before their paintings. In fact, the technique<span class="pagenum" id="Page_61">61</span>
-of graphic design can be effective only when it
-works subconsciously in the spectator’s mind. Furthermore,
-those old masters knew how to achieve many
-results through simple means. They knew how to produce
-unity, emphasis, balance, and rhythm by the skillful
-manipulation of even a single device.</p>
-
-<div id="if_i_061" class="figcenter" style="max-width: 34em;">
- <img src="images/i_061.jpg" width="2162" height="1666" alt="" />
- <div class="caption"><i>A Triangle.</i> The fundamental pattern in a picture should not be obtrusive, as in this
-too obviously triangular shape. Compare this “still” with the illustration facing <a href="#Page_76">page
-76</a>. See also <a href="#Page_59">pages 59</a>, <a href="#Page_72">72</a> and <a href="#Page_76">76</a>.</div></div>
-
-<p>By contrast many motion picture directors of to-day
-are mere bunglers. For example, in the “still” portrait
-which we have just studied there is unity and a definite,
-though heavy, equilibrium, but there is no rhythm, and
-the emphasis is sadly misplaced. The pose of the woman
-and her relation to the rug and the background
-admittedly make a unity. Our eyes ranging over the
-triangle, can easily grasp all that is important in the
-picture and leave out the rest; but the triangular design
-is severe and makes a wrong emphasis. In the first
-place, the design is too obviously a triangle. We think
-of it as a mathematical figure, and thus waste part of
-the attention which should be directed upon the woman
-herself. And, in the second place, the accent is at the
-wrong corner and on the wrong side of the triangle.
-The base of the triangle is accented by containing the
-longest line in the composition, the line being further
-emphasized by its straightness and by the sharp contrast
-between black and white which it marks. This
-emphasis is, of course, wrong, for we are certainly not
-interested in the pattern of this rug. There is also no
-reason why our attention should be called to the woman’s
-foot, or to the adjacent corner of the white panel
-in the rug, yet our glance is attracted to that region
-by the strange zigzag line described by the slipper and
-that white corner. These accents are wrong at first
-glance, and they remain wrong as long as the picture<span class="pagenum" id="Page_62">62</span>
-lasts, because every time we repeat the tour of inspection
-our eyes rest a moment on these false interests.</p>
-
-<p>To show that these mistakes lie entirely in the treatment,
-and not in the device of the triangle, we need
-only turn to the painting of “Mme. Lebrun and Her
-Daughter,” facing <a href="#Page_76">page 76</a>. Here is a composition
-distinctly triangular in design, yet one may have admired
-this picture hundreds of times without observing
-that fact. Here is unity, without obviousness or
-severity. Our eyes leap to the apex of the triangle, and
-there find the chief interest, the head of the mother.
-And, as we continue gazing, our attention still favors
-the mother, because the white areas of her shoulder,
-arm, and robe attract the eye more strongly than the
-other portions of the picture. Here, too, is graceful
-balance and a flowing rhythm in every line.</p>
-
-<p>If we consider merely the dramatic action of the
-subjects, as the motion picture directors so often do,
-we observe that the poses in Mme. Lebrun’s painting
-are natural and easy, that the gesture is graceful and
-telling, and we realize how completely and impressively
-the technique of design, the craft of composition, expresses
-the message of the painter.</p>
-
-<p>A part of Mme. Lebrun’s technique consisted in
-eliminating the setting, because in this particular case
-she found it easier to express her meaning without
-describing environment. Setting may often well be
-eliminated in the movies, too, as in “Moon-Gold,” discussed
-below; but usually the physical environment of
-action, as has been stated rather exhaustively in Chapter
-VIII of “The Art of Photoplay Making,” can be
-dramatized more vividly in the movies than in any
-other narrative art. And it is an interesting problem<span class="pagenum" id="Page_63">63</span>
-of design to weave places into a definite unity with
-persons, things, and action.</p>
-
-<p>Let us see how this problem has been met in the
-cabin scene of “The Spell of the Yukon,” facing <a href="#Page_28">page
-28</a>, which, in spite of the too conspicuous window, already
-spoken of, has a rather successful pictorial arrangement.
-For the sake of experiment, this “still”
-may be analyzed by making a simple drawing, as in
-the sketch facing <a href="#Page_28">page 28</a>. We see that the design
-consists essentially of an oval shape surrounded by
-rectangles. The rectangles may be seen in the lines of
-the window, the bunk, the table, etc. The oval, which
-includes all of the dramatic action, may be traced from
-the boy’s head, down the boy’s arm to the man’s
-right knee and leg, up the man’s left hand, arm, and
-shoulder to his head, and thence across to the boy’s
-head again. In the center of this oval is the hand
-holding a pipe and making a telling gesture in the
-story.</p>
-
-<p>This oval design, taken by itself, is an excellent composition.
-The lines furnish easy paths for the eye, and
-bind the boy and man together into a dramatic unity.
-There is, to be sure, only an imaginary line between
-the faces of the man and the boy, but that imaginary
-line is nevertheless as vivid as any visible thing in the
-picture. In fact, the break in the visible part of the
-oval serves to arrest our attention upon the faces for
-a moment every time our glance swings through the
-oval pattern. Leading toward this oval are the straight
-lines of the bunk and the table, thus serving to give
-unity and force. But the lines of the window make
-an isolated pattern which, instead of leading one’s eye
-toward the dramatic focus, does just the opposite. The<span class="pagenum" id="Page_64">64</span>
-design, as a whole, therefore, is imperfect. And, though
-we see much in the picture, we do not see it entirely
-with ease.</p>
-
-<p>If we turn to “Derby Day,” facing this page, a drawing
-by the English artist, Thomas Rowlandson, we
-shall find a more interesting design and a surer control
-of accents. Here the basic theme is a long line.
-By “line” in this case we mean, not merely a single
-stroke of the pencil, but any succession of lines, shapes,
-or even spots, so arranged that they make a track for
-the eye to follow. In “Derby Day” the long swinging
-line of the road is the basis of the design. Yet this
-line is not quite identical with the wheel tracks. It begins,
-in fact, with the feet of the donkey at the lower
-right-hand corner of the frame, and follows through
-the dog, the baskets under the wagon, the hub of the
-wheel, then over the heads of the group, through the
-hubs of the third wagon, then with a slight downward
-drop it swings along the edge of the field and the hedge,
-and finally leads through the horses and wagons, out at
-the left end of the picture.</p>
-
-<div id="if_i_064a" class="figcenter" style="max-width: 29em;">
- <img src="images/i_064a.jpg" width="1808" height="1151" alt="" />
- <div class="caption"><i>Derby Day</i>, a drawing by Thomas Rowlandson, showing the kind of
-composition which could be effectively used in photoplays. See <a href="#Page_64">page 64</a>.</div></div>
-
-<div id="if_i_064b" class="figcenter" style="max-width: 29em;">
- <img src="images/i_064b.png" width="1808" height="1174" alt="" />
- <div class="caption">Analysis of the fundamental design in <i>Derby Day</i> (above). See
-<a href="#Page_64">page 64</a>.</div></div>
-
-<p>Upon this line the whole design is built, and rather
-cleverly, too, for our attention is controlled by the
-subtle ordination of accents. At the right end of the
-line is the most unusual and striking shape in the picture,
-namely, the curved figure described by the wagon-cover
-and the wheel. Such a strange shape, as we have
-pointed out earlier in this chapter, has a strong attraction
-for the eye, and in this picture marks emphasis
-Number One. Emphasis Number Two occurs near the
-middle of the road at the turn, where four or more lines
-meet to form a cross. These lines are produced by
-the basic line already described, by the conspicuous<span class="pagenum" id="Page_65">65</span>
-tree, and by the hedge which runs up to it from the
-left side of the bottom frame. Here again are illustrated
-visual laws already discussed. The third emphasis
-in this picture is where the road runs out on the
-left, our eyes being drawn in that direction by the
-familiar device of converging lines. Observe that the
-mass of trees in the background forms a distinct wedge
-with the point toward the left, that the wagon train
-itself tapers sharply, that the three trees along the road
-are successively smaller toward the left, and that the
-field on that side of the road tapers somewhat in the
-same direction. The combined effect of these converging
-lines and tapering shapes carries our vision
-along the road so insistently that we follow it in
-imagination beyond the frame.</p>
-
-<p>Thus by the magic of pictorial design our vision is
-caught and so controlled that a single glance, sweeping
-the picture in the direction ordained by the artist,
-gives us a definite feeling of movement. No matter
-who looks, or how often, he will see the accents in the
-order we have named—covered wagon, turn of the
-road, far end of the road—and will thus get the main
-story of the picture in the shortest time, the simplest
-terms, and with the right emphasis. If this picture
-were to be thrown upon the screen for only a second
-we are confident that every spectator would instantly
-get the primary meaning, (1) wagon loads of merry-makers
-(2) are swinging (3) up the road. There
-are minor interests, too, such as the comic figures
-and actions of the characters, the prancing of dogs and
-horses, the rustic cottage, the tops of trees, clouds,
-etc.; but these are kept subsidiary in the design and
-yet, as they emerge one by one, they are found to be<span class="pagenum" id="Page_66">66</span>
-in complete harmony with the main theme, the movement
-of merry-makers along a country road.</p>
-
-<p>Of course, if a scene like this were filmed and
-thrown upon the screen, the wagon train would actually
-be moving, and we would perceive the motion,
-rather than infer it or feel it, as we do from the
-fixed design of the drawing. Yet, if the cinema director
-were indifferent as to where he placed his accents,
-and trusted to chance for his pictorial pattern,
-we would surely not perceive that motion in its full
-significance. Now, if lines, shapes and tonal values
-in a certain arrangement can clarify and emphasize
-the message of a picture, it is obvious that in some
-other arrangement they could obscure and minimize
-that message. For example, if “Derby Day” were
-filmed, and the composition were left to accident or
-to the bungling of some director ignorant of the laws
-of design, it is quite probable that he would “feature”
-the “picturesque” cottage, or perhaps a “cunning” dog,
-a “scenic” tree, the “patriotic pull” of the flag, or the
-“side-splitting” corpulency of a woman. No spectator
-would then see or feel the dominant idea of this
-subject, which is the joy of going away on the open
-road.</p>
-
-<p>Right here it is a pleasure to state for the benefit
-of any reader who may not have seen “The Covered
-Wagon,” that James Cruze, the director of that
-photoplay, did not bungle his composition. Always
-the historic wagon train of the pioneers strikes the
-dominant note of the scene, seeming to compose itself
-spontaneously into a pictorial pattern which accents
-the dramatic meaning. This is true even when
-there is no physical movement. In the arroyo scene,<span class="pagenum" id="Page_67">67</span>
-for example, facing <a href="#Page_93">page 93</a>, the wagons, drawn up
-into formation for a camp, harmonize sternly with the
-savage-looking cliffs, and their zigzag arrangement
-somehow suggests the sharp action of the fight with
-the Indians which fate holds in store for this very
-place.</p>
-
-<p>Enough has now been said to illustrate how design
-in a picture can control our attention during the
-pauses and arrested moments on the screen, and by
-so doing can relieve the eyes of unnecessary, wasteful
-work and give unity and emphasis to the message of
-the picture. But still other powers reside in design.
-While it hastens our grasp of meanings, and even accentuates
-those meanings, it can affect the mind in
-other ways that are still more important. And if we
-delve deeper into these ways we shall come out with
-a clearer vision of the artistic possibilities of the
-movies.</p>
-
-<hr />
-
-<div id="toclink_68" class="chapter">
-<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_68">68</span></p>
-
-<h2 class="nobreak" id="CHAPTER_V">CHAPTER V.<br />
-
-<span class="subhead">RHYTHM AND REPOSE IN FIXED DESIGN</span></h2>
-</div>
-
-<p class="in0"><span class="firstword">Directness,</span> ease, emphasis, unity—these are the
-things which we have just demanded of cinema composition,
-the pictorial form which contains, and at the
-same time reveals, the story of a photoplay. But we
-demand something more. We do not get complete
-æsthetic pleasure from any composition which merely
-contains and reveals something else. The vessel, while
-serving to convey its treasure, should have a charm of
-its own. In poetry, for example, we are not satisfied
-with the language which merely expresses the poetic
-content in clear and forceful style. We crave poetic
-language, too, words and sentences that sound like
-music and that by their very form appeal to our fancy.</p>
-
-<p>In fact most people who have a highly developed
-taste for pictorial art, consider that beauty of treatment
-is more important than beauty of subject. Their
-emotions are stirred by something in the arrangement
-of the lines, masses, tones, and colors, something that
-serves other purposes than those of clearness, coherence,
-and emphasis. What that something is, has
-always been a great question to students of æsthetics.
-Mr. Clive Bell, for example, suggests that the essential
-beauty of art lies in “significant form.” But you<span class="pagenum" id="Page_69">69</span>
-have to read through his very interesting book entitled
-“Art” to get some notion of what he means by that
-term. Miss Ethel D. Puffer, in her book “The Psychology
-of Beauty,” has developed the very illuminating
-theory that the effect of beauty on the human
-mind is both to stimulate and give repose. And we
-shall adopt her theory for a while as a basis for a
-brief discussion of rhythm and balance in cinematic
-forms.</p>
-
-<p>The terms “stimulation and repose,” are, of course,
-contrary. The feelings which they describe are in
-conflict. Yet this inner conflict between stimulation
-and repose always takes place when a person is faced
-with great beauty of art or nature. Any one of us
-can testify to that from experience. When listening
-to music, when reading a poem, when watching a
-play, when gazing at a temple, at a statue, or a painting,
-we have felt something strangely stirring and at
-the same time soothing, something both kindling and
-cooling, an inspiration to do great deeds, and at the
-same time a desire to rest for the while in satisfied
-contemplation.</p>
-
-<p>Applying this theory to pictorial composition on
-the screen, we may say that the quality of balance in
-line, pattern, and tone suggests repose, while pulsating
-rhythm stimulates us to activity. This application at
-least has the merit of giving us something definite to
-discuss.</p>
-
-<p>Looking at the mechanical aspects of balance in a
-picture we shall see that it can easily be analyzed.
-There is the balance of quantity which may be seen
-by comparing the right half of the picture with the
-left half, or the upper half with the lower half. Balance<span class="pagenum" id="Page_70">70</span>
-of quantity is often connected with symmetry
-in the fundamental pattern, as in the figure of the triangle.
-Further, there is balance through depth, the
-foreground weighing against the background. Another
-kind of balance is that of echoing motifs, a sort
-of fulfillment of the eye’s expectations. There is also
-a balance of interests, which is quite different from
-the balance of quantity, because a small quantity of
-one thing may have greater weight of interest than a
-large quantity of something else. And there is the
-balance of contrasts, such as light against shadow, or
-straight lines against curved lines. How balance in
-all of these forms may be obtained in cinema composition
-will be discussed in the first half of this
-chapter.</p>
-
-<p>One of the simplest tests for balance in a static
-picture is to draw a vertical line through the center
-of the picture, and then to estimate the weight, so to
-speak, of the two halves of the composition thus
-formed. If we try the experiment with the “still”
-from the photoplay “Maria Rosa,” facing <a href="#Page_71">page 71</a>,
-we see at once that the left half is too heavy. Besides
-containing by far the greater dramatic interest, it contains
-too many objects, shapes, and lines to attract the
-eye.</p>
-
-<div id="if_i_071" class="figcenter" style="max-width: 35em;">
- <img src="images/i_071.jpg" width="2186" height="1650" alt="" />
- <div class="caption">From <i>Maria Rosa</i>. An interesting composition, but thrown out of balance by too much
-weight in the left half. See <a href="#Page_70">page 70</a>.</div></div>
-
-<p>Now if this “still” were a student’s painting which
-fell under the eye of the master, he might suggest
-various ways of “saving” it. For example, some of
-the bric-a-brac might be “painted out” from the dressing
-table, the lower lines of the mirror might be
-softened, and the door reflected in the mirror might
-be painted out, while some similar interest might be
-painted in at the right of the picture. Or if this “still”<span class="pagenum" id="Page_71">71</span>
-were an amateur print for your kodak album, you
-might improve the picture considerably by trimming
-off the right end as far as the woman’s skirt; that
-is, about one-fifth of the entire width. You can estimate
-the value of that improvement right now by
-shutting off that part of the “still” with a sheet of
-paper or any convenient thing that may be used as
-a mask. Another picture may be formed by shutting
-off the left third, just including the reflection of the
-woman in the mirror. What then remains is a composition
-in beautiful balance, which, incidentally,
-appeals more strongly to the imagination than the
-“still” taken as a whole.</p>
-
-<p>But neither trimming nor repainting nor retouching
-can be employed to alter a bad grouping that has
-been recorded on a film. We sympathize, therefore,
-with the conscientious cinema composer who has made
-a mistake in composition, for he is forced either to
-“shoot” the scene again or to clip it out entirely from
-the film.</p>
-
-<p>Another test for balance of quantity is to draw a
-horizontal line through the center of the composition
-and weigh the visual values in the upper and lower
-halves thus formed. In the case of horizontal divisions,
-however, we have accustomed ourselves to
-expect greater weight at the bottom, because that is
-the natural arrangement of material things about us.
-Keeping this fact in mind let us analyze the “still”
-from “Audrey,” facing <a href="#Page_45">page 45</a>. A glance shows us
-that the composition is top-heavy, for almost everything
-of interest lies above the center line. But turn
-the picture upside down, and look upon it as though
-it were a pattern meant to be viewed in that position;<span class="pagenum" id="Page_72">72</span>
-you feel immediately that the distribution of weights
-is more pleasing. Now hold it as if the right end
-were the bottom, and the composition takes on a heavy
-balance, with a commonplace symmetry of four long,
-rising and spreading lines. This is so because the
-right half, which is really too heavy when the picture
-is viewed in the position intended by the director,
-seems to be a weight in place when considered as the
-bottom of a pattern.</p>
-
-<p>Yet we may find beauty in this “still,” if we only
-have the patience to corner it. Cover up three-quarters
-of the composition, that is, all of the left half,
-and all of the lower half; then the remaining quarter
-will contain a pleasant composition, and a delightful
-appeal to the imagination. There is in that upper
-right-hand quarter, both balance and rhythm, both
-repose and stimulation. The heroine’s gestures carry
-our attention to the left, in the direction she is going;
-but her glances, and the attracting power of the converging
-trees, carry our attention to the right. And
-in the course of this easy playing to and fro our fancy
-swings out beyond the frame into realms of our own
-imagination.</p>
-
-<p>But there is still another test for pictorial equilibrium.
-Besides the balance of one side against the
-other and of the top against the bottom, a picture
-should preserve a balance between the foreground and
-the background. This assumes that the picture really
-suggests the dimension of depth, which is usually
-the case. Interesting exceptions, however, may appear
-occasionally, as in the “still” facing <a href="#Page_61">page 61</a>, and the
-painting facing <a href="#Page_76">page 76</a>. One may even find entire
-photoplays with scenes done in two dimensions only.<span class="pagenum" id="Page_73">73</span>
-For example, “Moon-Gold,” a Will Bradley production,
-released in 1921, presents a story of Pierrot,
-Columbine, and Harlequin in a series of scenes in a
-single plane. There is no background except blackness,
-and there is no foreground at all. The pictures
-are as flat as a poster. Such elimination of setting
-may have artistic merit, especially in stories of familiar
-or naïve themes, but in more involved stories it is
-desirable to include the whole setting of the action,
-not only because of the dramatic power of environment,
-but also because of the pictorial wealth which
-may thus be added.</p>
-
-<p>To test this third balance of a picture you need
-only imagine a curtain of glass dropped so as to separate
-equally the interests near the spectator from those
-farther away. Such a plane is, in fact, usually
-imagined by a painter when he lays out his design.
-Though he does not cut his ground mechanically into
-two equal areas, he usually does distribute his subjects
-so that the spectator needs not feel that the foreground
-is only a long waste to be crossed, or that
-the background is but an empty region which lies
-beyond everything of interest.</p>
-
-<p>The word “depth” in connection with the screen
-has doubtless made our readers think of the stereoscopic
-motion picture as produced by the Teleview
-and other companies. Such pictures are truly remarkable
-in their mechanical power of showing physical
-depth through a scene. They show you the images
-clearly separated, some near and some far away,
-so that you feel as if you could really walk in and
-out among them. To be able to produce such an
-illusion is something that any inventor may well be<span class="pagenum" id="Page_74">74</span>
-proud of; and yet it is doubtful that the stereoscopic
-picture will bring about any improvement in the artistic
-composition of the motion picture. Most of us can
-recall the “stereoscope and views” which we used to
-find on the center tables of our country aunts. How
-well we remember the mystifying illusion of depth
-which was created. How well we remember also that
-there was the same depth in the reeking stockyards
-of Kansas City as in the cathedral aisle of Rheims!
-That illustrates the shortcoming of purely mechanical
-things in the service of art. The stereoscopic machinery
-cannot in itself create beauty. It cannot automatically
-so select trees or distribute people over a
-landscape that balance and rhythm, unity and emphasis
-will appear in the finished picture. Unfortunately,
-for the uninspired artist, the mechanician cannot help
-him.</p>
-
-<p>It may be asked whether stereoscopic pictures may
-not be utilized to get sculptural effects upon the screen.
-The answer is that if a piece of sculpture had to be
-viewed through a single peep-hole and under an
-unchanging light it would not really have a sculptural
-appeal. The characteristic appeal of sculpture is due
-largely to the fact that it is possible for the beholder
-to shift his gaze at will from one side of the statue
-to the other. He even walks around the statue, thus
-getting ever new aspects of the subject until he has
-completed the circle of inspection. And this shifting
-view is governed entirely by his own interest and
-choice. The sculptor has deliberately shaped his
-marble so that the many aspects will be interesting
-variations of the same theme. That many-sidedness
-of sculpture is one of its distinctive qualities as art.<span class="pagenum" id="Page_75">75</span>
-But when you look at a stereoscopic motion picture it
-is absolutely impossible for you to “see around” the
-objects any farther than the camera has done, no matter
-how much you shift your position. The other
-sides of all the objects and figures might as well be
-missing. Your point of view is fixed absolutely in
-the stereoscopic picture, just as it is in the ordinary
-“flat” picture. But perhaps there are other ways in
-which the Teleview and similar inventions can provide
-new opportunities for the cinema artist. That
-remains to be shown by experimentation, and, of
-course, such experimentation is welcome and should
-be encouraged.</p>
-
-<p>However, for all purposes of pictorial art a sufficient
-illusion of depth can be produced in the “flat” picture.
-This can be done by the simplest instruments
-and means of picture making, even by the use of a
-lead pencil and a piece of paper. There are only two
-secrets of perspective. One is to render parallel lines,
-that is, lines which are actually parallel in the subject,
-so that they converge in the distance and, if
-continued, would meet at a “vanishing point.” The
-other is to render objects with increasing dimness as
-they occupy positions at increasing distances away
-from us.</p>
-
-<p>One might suppose that in a photograph these problems
-of perspective would take care of themselves.
-But they do not, as may be seen by turning to the
-“still” of the conservatory scene, facing <a href="#Page_100">page 100</a>.
-There we find a jumble of stuff apparently all in the
-same vertical plane. Why does the standing woman
-wear a palm leaf in her hair? Why does the man
-wear the top of a doorway upon his head? And why<span class="pagenum" id="Page_76">76</span>
-does the seated woman bury her head in the ferns?
-They do not actually, of course, carry on thus hilariously;
-but some one has carelessly coaxed the background
-into the foreground by making remote objects
-intensely distinct, instead of subduing them into the
-soft values of distance.</p>
-
-<p>But we have dwelt so long on the subject of balance
-in design that we fear the reader may think we
-have over-emphasized the point. No one quality in
-pictorial composition should be out of balance with
-the others. Thus, too sharp an emphasis may violate
-balance, and too perfect a balance may violate rhythm.
-After all, the kind of balance we desire in pictorial
-design is that which is sufficient, but no more. We
-do not, as a rule, enjoy the mathematical figure of the
-equilateral triangle, standing heavily on its base, because
-it is balanced beyond the need of any living
-thing. It suggests the dead repose of the pyramids of
-Egypt, the tombs of her forgotten kings. Such a
-severe design is utterly unsuitable, therefore, in the
-portrait of a lithe young lady clad in silks and tulle,
-as illustrated in the “still” facing <a href="#Page_61">page 61</a>. It is flat
-and hard, and the eye following forever its monotonous
-outlines misses the variety of rhythm. Yet a triangle,
-you say, serves the purpose of unity and emphasis.
-Alter it then by making it narrower, with a less
-obvious base, and by swinging a live rhythm into its
-sides, as in the painting of “Mme. Lebrun and Her
-Daughter,” facing this page.</p>
-
-<p>But this brings us to a discussion of the mysterious
-quality of rhythm. Rhythm is entirely too evasive
-for a tight definition, but perhaps we can learn much
-by saying things about it.</p>
-
-<div id="if_i_076" class="figcenter" style="max-width: 26em;">
- <img src="images/i_076.jpg" width="1664" height="2215" alt="" />
- <div class="caption"><i>Mme. LeBrun and Her Daughter</i>, a painting by Mme. Vigée-Lebrun.
-A good figure composition on the basis of a triangle. Compare
-<span class="pagenum" id="Page_77">77</span>with the “still” shown facing <a href="#Page_61">page 61</a>. See also pages <a href="#Page_62">62</a> and <a href="#Page_76">76</a>.</div></div>
-
-<p>Rhythm in music may be partially described as a
-peculiar alternating movement, with an alternation
-between sounds of different pitch, quality, and quantity;
-between different sound groups, and between
-sound and silence. The rhythm of visible motion is
-of a somewhat similar nature, as we shall see in Chapter
-VIII. But a sense of alternating movement may
-be produced by things which are not themselves in
-motion. We can, therefore, find rhythm in fixed lines,
-shapes, tones, colors, and textures. This we shall call
-rhythm of fixed design.</p>
-
-<p>The peculiar thing about the element of alternation
-in rhythm which distinguishes it from mere repetition,
-is that it is not regular, like the swinging of a
-pendulum, but contains numerous variations from
-regularity. But, while the symmetry of rhythm is only
-partial, so also the variety is limited. It is the combined
-effect of these two factors which makes rhythm
-delightful. Repetition or symmetry in a line or a
-pattern is pleasurable because, as explained in Chapter
-III, it enables us to see much with ease. But, at
-the same time, subtle or even bold variations are
-appealing because they relieve us of monotony, stimulate
-our interest, and lead our eyes in search of further
-variations.</p>
-
-<p>A familiar rhythm of line is that of the reverse
-curve, which Hogarth called “the line of beauty.” This
-line is beautifully used in the painting “Daylight and
-Lamplight,” facing <a href="#Page_39">page 39</a>. Observe the effect of
-alternation with variety in the lines which bound the
-urn, the woman’s figure, and the various shadows and
-lights in the background. Your eye sweeps over those
-paths without effort, and you get a sense of movement,<span class="pagenum" id="Page_78">78</span>
-as though you yourself were drawing these lines with
-a brush or crayon. Analyze the composition and you
-will see how richly the lines are woven together. Compare
-all the small curves with each other, compare all
-the larger curves, all the short straight lines, all the
-longer straight lines, etc., and you will discover an
-amazing amount of alternation and repetition, with
-an equally amazing amount of deviation from regularity.</p>
-
-<p>Imagine that the painting which we have just
-analyzed is an accented moment in a motion picture,
-and you must imagine another similar design a few
-seconds earlier in the action and still another one a
-few seconds later, as the woman walks gracefully
-through the room. In fact, there would be a whole
-series of similar designs during the brief time that
-the woman’s figure and the urn are in decorative contact.
-The instant of action which the painter has
-chosen to fix on canvas might well be the same instant
-which you would select as the pictorial climax in this
-motion picture. This climax, accented perhaps with
-a pause, accented also by the pictorial approach and
-departure, is something which you would long remember
-as a rhythmical moment in the photoplay.</p>
-
-<p>In the picture which we have just described the
-rhythm is found chiefly in the continuity and richness
-of line and in a certain active balancing of similar
-with dissimilar lines. The design is simple, almost
-plain. It is a single pattern which does not recur
-again within the frame. Quite different in type is the
-composition of a group picture such as “The Banquet
-of the Officers of St. Andrew,” facing <a href="#Page_79">page 79</a>, where
-the rhythm is in the flow of patterns rather than in<span class="pagenum" id="Page_79">79</span>
-the flow of lines. Take a hat, for example, as the
-decorative theme and observe how definitely, yet how
-subtly, that theme is four times varied. Note further
-how the curves of the hats are echoed, always with
-variety, in the ruffs.</p>
-
-<div id="if_i_079a" class="figcenter" style="max-width: 27em;">
- <img src="images/i_079a.jpg" width="1695" height="1339" alt="" />
- <div class="caption">From <i>Polly of the Circus</i>. Compare this “still” with <i>Banquet of the
-Officers of St. Andrew</i> (below) and you get at once the distinct impression
-that the painting depicts a larger crowd than the “still.” As a
-matter of fact, the painter has used only twelve men to produce his
-effect, while the motion picture director has employed seventeen men,
-a woman, and a horse. This difference illustrates the practical utility
-of pictorial design. See <a href="#Page_57">page 57</a>.</div></div>
-
-<div id="if_i_079b" class="figcenter" style="max-width: 27em;">
- <img src="images/i_079b.jpg" width="1700" height="1119" alt="" />
- <div class="caption"><i>Banquet of the Officers of St. Andrew</i>, a painting by Frans Hals.
-See above and <a href="#Page_78">page 78</a>.</div></div>
-
-<p>But so many curves would make the picture too rich
-in quality were it not for the skillful introduction of
-straight lines to make, as it were, a series of alternating
-notes. You observe immediately the long
-straight lines of the windows, of the two flags, and
-of the table. But you do not at first observe that there
-are several dozen shorter straight lines, and that, curiously
-enough, they are nearly all parallel to each other.
-Take as a key the sash of the first seated officer, counting
-from the left, and you will find a surprising number
-of similarities to this motif throughout the composition,
-all the way from the shadows on the window
-casing in the upper left hand corner to the edge of the
-table in the lower right hand corner. Yet, because
-these similar straight lines are so frequently alternated
-with varying curves, we get from the picture a
-stirring sense of a swinging movement.</p>
-
-<p>Here, again, is an arrested moment of action which
-might conceivably have come out of a motion picture.
-What the arrangement of the twelve men might have
-been at other moments of the scene we do not know.
-Perhaps they were all sitting when the scene opened;
-perhaps they had all arisen before it closed; but for
-this one instant, at least, they have resolved themselves
-into an interesting design of simple patterns in a
-rhythmical series.</p>
-
-<p>Another source of rhythm in a fixed picture may
-be the tonal gradations. In a painting there would be<span class="pagenum" id="Page_80">80</span>
-a play of colors from hue to hue and from tint to
-shade. In ordinary photography there may be a
-similar play from deep black to intense white through
-all the intervening values. It is all a question of lighting
-and choice of subjects for the light to fall upon.
-The painter has an advantage over the photographer
-because he does not have to record light and shadow
-exactly as they are on the subject. He can soften his
-shadows or paint them out completely. He can alter
-his tones and values at will, even after the painting
-is practically finished. As an offset to this the cinema
-composer has, of course, the power of presenting
-movement, fugues and passages of light and shadow.
-And, by the use of the newest apparatus for lighting,
-and by careful attention to the color values and textures
-of sets, costumes, etc., he can also produce many
-of the rhythmical effects of gradation in fixed tones
-which we are accustomed to look for in painting.</p>
-
-<p>As time goes on we shall more and more often find
-pictorial moments on the screen which exhibit as fine
-a rhythm of fixed tones and masses as, for example,
-Van Dyck’s “Portrait of Charles I,” facing <a href="#Page_163">page 163</a>.
-If you draw a straight line across this picture in almost
-any direction, it will mark a great variety of
-graded values, a lovely shifting of light and shadow,
-with no sharp contrasts except those which serve to
-attract the spectator’s attention to the head of the
-king. There is perfect harmony of composition here.
-The tones are in a rhythmical design, yet it is a rhythm
-which keeps the emphasis on the focal interest and
-preserves the balance throughout the painting.</p>
-
-<p>Two or three men, a horse, and a bit of landscape
-is no uncommon subject in photoplays. We have reason,<span class="pagenum" id="Page_81">81</span>
-therefore, to expect that from long practice all
-directors will learn how to treat it pictorially, and
-with ever new variety of beauty.</p>
-
-<p>The general field of composition in fixed design has
-now been surveyed. We have tried to show that a
-good pictorial composition, even from a commercial
-point of view, is one which provides instant emphasis
-on the focal interest; which unites this focal interest
-with the other parts of the picture by means of a certain
-arrangement, or pattern; which keeps all of its
-values in a reposeful balance, and which pulsates with
-a vital rhythm. These four qualities—emphasis, unity,
-balance, and rhythm—are necessary in what might be
-called the mechanics of beauty, the technique of design.
-We admit, cheerfully, that the beauty of a given masterpiece
-cannot be explained by pointing out an observance
-of certain fundamental laws of design, for an
-uninspired artist might obey all these laws without
-ever achieving beauty, just as a machinist might obey
-all the laws of mechanics without ever inventing a
-machine. But we insist that an observance of pictorial
-laws is a first condition that must be fulfilled by the
-artist before the mysterious quality of beauty will
-arise in his work.</p>
-
-<p>The accented moment in a pictorial movement,
-which we have studied from so many angles, is, of
-course, not fixed on the screen for any great length
-of time, never for more than a few seconds, though
-it may remain fixed in memory for years. Nor is it
-a separate thing upon the screen. It rises from an
-earlier moment and flows into a later one. The rapid
-succession of momentarily fixed pictures on the screen
-is, in fact, what gives the illusion of motion. Yet it<span class="pagenum" id="Page_82">82</span>
-would not, therefore, be correct to say that the motion
-picture as a whole can be made beautiful by making
-each separate exposure in itself a beautiful composition.
-The successive pictures must play, one into the next,
-in a stream of composition which contains
-new delights for the eye, and which, alas, contains
-new dangers for the ignorant or careless maker of
-pictures. What these delights and dangers are we
-shall see in the following chapters.</p>
-
-<hr />
-
-<div id="toclink_83" class="chapter">
-<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_83">83</span></p>
-
-<h2 class="nobreak" id="CHAPTER_VI">CHAPTER VI<br />
-
-<span class="subhead">MOTIONS IN A PICTURE</span></h2>
-</div>
-
-<p class="in0"><span class="firstword">Pictorial</span> motion is thousands of years older than the
-motion picture. It is as old as the oldest art of all,
-the dance. Before man had learned how to weave his
-own fancies into plots, or how to make drawings of
-things that he saw, he had doubtless often feasted his
-eyes upon the rhythmic beauty created by dancers.
-Their art was the composition of motions. We can
-well imagine how they began by exhibiting bodily postures,
-gestures, and mimicry; how they proceeded to
-add other movements, such as the fluttering of garments,
-the brandishing of weapons, the waving of
-flaring torches, and how they, in time, made their
-composition more involved by swinging themselves
-into swaying groups, circling and threading fanciful
-patterns.</p>
-
-<p>As a form of art the dance has been preserved
-through the ages in an apparently unbroken history.
-And it has had various off-shoots besides; for religious
-and secular processions, pantomime, and even drama,
-have had their beginnings in the dance. Pictorial
-motion was to be seen two thousand years ago in the
-Roman triumphs and processions, whose gaudiest features
-survive in the familiar circus parade of today.<span class="pagenum" id="Page_84">84</span>
-And the circus itself is in a sense the pictorial motion
-of animals and men.</p>
-
-<p>In the presentation of drama, too, pictorial motion
-has always played a vital part. When we look back
-over the history of the theater we see that the managers
-were never satisfied with the mere physical
-exhibition of actors and dancers, but began very early
-to add other motions to their performance. A large
-variety of motions was added by bringing animals
-upon the scenes. Fire was put into the service of
-show. We know that its flame and flicker, borne in
-torches or beating upon the witches’ caldron, was not
-uncommon on Shakespeare’s stage. Water in the
-form of leaping cascades and playing fountains was
-used at least two hundred years ago to make the scene
-more pictorial. More recently, wind has been produced
-artificially in order to give motion to draperies,
-flags, or foliage.</p>
-
-<p>All this amounts to something far more than an
-attempt to bring nature upon the stage. It is the
-creation of new beauty. The kind of beauty which
-professional entertainers have for thousands of years
-spun together from various motions into patterns
-simple or subtle, is the beauty of art, for it comes from
-human personality expressing itself in forms and combinations
-never found as such in nature.</p>
-
-<p>Now, if these showmen are really artists, at least
-in intent, we may well ask how they have combined
-their motions so as to produce the pleasing effects
-which they desired. Have they worked hit-or-miss
-and achieved beauty only by accident, or have they
-intentionally or instinctively obeyed certain laws of
-the human eye and mind?</p>
-
-<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_85">85</span></p>
-
-<p>How does the director of a motion picture make
-sure that pleasing motion will appear upon the screen?
-Does he alter, or select, his subjects? Does he choose
-his point of view? Does he patiently wait for the
-right moment? Or must beauty come by accident, as
-music might come from a cat’s running over the keyboard
-of a piano?</p>
-
-<p>There must be laws of pictorial motion, just as
-there are laws of color, design, modelling, architectural
-construction, all of which appeal to the eye without
-visible motion. And, since the motion picture can
-capture and combine and reproduce a greater variety
-of moving things than was ever before possible in
-the history of art, it seems particularly important
-that we make earnest efforts to find out under what
-laws these manifold motions may be organized into
-art.</p>
-
-<p>In studying the movies one might easily come to
-the conclusion that some directors aim only to make
-motions life-like. Their whole creed seems to be that
-a heart-broken woman should move her shoulders and
-chest as though she really were heart-broken, that a
-goat should act exactly like a goat, and that a windmill
-should behave itself exactly like a windmill. Now,
-it may be very desirable, as far as it goes, that an
-emotion be “registered” fitly. But to aim at fitting
-expression alone is to aim at naturalness alone. And
-this is not enough, because there may be natural ugliness,
-and because even the beauty of nature is essentially
-different from the beauty of art.</p>
-
-<p>Shakespeare’s plays are not admired simply because
-they reveal human character truthfully. Rembrandt’s
-paintings are not preserved in museums merely because<span class="pagenum" id="Page_86">86</span>
-they are truthful representations of Dutchmen. The
-Venus of Milo would not have a room to herself in
-the Louvre if the statue were nothing more than a
-life-like figure of a woman partly dressed. In drama,
-poetry, fiction, painting, sculpture, and music, it has
-never been considered that appropriateness, naturalness,
-or truthfulness was in itself sufficient to distinguish
-the work as art. And it surely cannot be so in
-the movies.</p>
-
-<p>It certainly has not been so in the earlier arts of
-motion. The dance as a form of expression is beautiful,
-but it is so far from natural that if the average
-voter started out to express his joy or grief, or love
-or defiance, the way a dancer does on the stage, he
-would be given a free ride to the psychopathic ward.
-The stage pantomime is charming, but if you behaved
-in the presence of your true love the way Pierrot and
-Columbine behave, he or she, as the case may be,
-would probably decide that you were too much of a
-clown ever to become a responsible parent. The circus,
-too, though not properly to be classed as a form
-of art, combines and presents a vast number of interesting
-motions which you never expect to see outside
-the big tent. Dancers, pantomime actors, circus masters
-and performers, all clearly strive to collect our
-money by showing us the kind of motions which nature
-herself does not show.</p>
-
-<p>But do not become alarmed. We do not propose
-to establish a school of unnatural acting in the
-movies. Let the women and men and greyhounds and
-weeping willows and brooks be as natural as they can
-be, like themselves and not like each other. Natural,
-yes, providing they be not natural in an ugly way. If<span class="pagenum" id="Page_87">87</span>
-a brook is running in one direction as naturally as it
-can, and a greyhound is running in the opposite direction
-as naturally as he can, the combination of their
-contrary movements may not be pleasing in a motion
-picture. Art is art, not because it reflects some actual
-bit of nature, but because it is endowed with some
-beauty made by man.</p>
-
-<p>What other properties pictorial motion should have,
-besides correct representation of action has been partly
-told in Chapter III, where the demands of ease and
-economy of vision were made a condition concomitant
-with beauty. We may further apply the same tests
-which have been applied to fixed design. But, in order
-to get a firm grasp of our subject let us first reduce
-pictorial motions to their simplest forms.</p>
-
-<p>The simplest motion of all is the moving spot,
-especially when it is entirely unrelated to a setting or
-background; that is, the kind of moving spot which
-the spectator may see without at the same time seeing
-any other thing, either fixed or moving. A familiar
-example in nature is the dark dot of a bird flying high
-above us in a cloudless sky. An example from the
-screen is the effect of a ball of fire shot from a Roman
-candle through darkness, as in the battle scenes of
-Griffith’s “Birth of a Nation.” But even so simple a
-moving thing as a spot has two properties which are
-very important to the composer of motions. The moving
-spot, like all other motions, has direction and velocity.
-The buzzard soaring slowly in large circles
-affects us in one way, while the hawk swooping downward
-sharply, or the crow flying in a straight line, or
-the bat fluttering crazily in the air, affects us in quite
-a different way.</p>
-
-<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_88">88</span></p>
-
-<p>When direction and velocity are controlled, even a
-single moving spot may describe beautiful motion.
-Witness an airplane maneuvering high in the sky, or a
-torch waved gracefully in the darkness. Beauty
-springs from control; ugliness follows lack of control.
-But control is no easy thing in the movies, for it is
-rare indeed that a director has only a single moving
-point to manage. Almost always, he has the problem
-of relative direction and relative speed. Moving things
-must be related to other moving things, and also to
-fixed things. Even if the picture consists only of a
-torch waved against a black background, we have the
-problem of relating that motion to the four fixed lines
-of the frame of the screen.</p>
-
-<p>But can we expect a motion picture director to stop
-and think of so small a matter as a ball thrown from
-one hand to another, to ask himself whether such an
-action is beautifully related, in direction and velocity,
-to everything else in the picture, fixed or moving?
-Yes, we can expect him to do so until he becomes
-artist enough to think of these matters without stopping.
-He should think about pictorial composition
-until he can obey its laws without thought. Let him
-remember that even a flock of geese can compose
-themselves so appealingly in the sky and a herd of
-cows can wind so gracefully down a hillside that a
-tender girl and a tough hobo will gaze alike upon them
-in open-mouthed admiration.</p>
-
-<p>The geese in the sky and the cows on the hillside
-are only a lot of moving spots, until they arrange, or
-compose, themselves. They may then illustrate the
-second type of moving object, that of the moving
-line. A line may, for example, move along its own<span class="pagenum" id="Page_89">89</span>
-length in a way which pleases the eyes. Such motions
-we see in the slender waterfall, in the narrow
-stream, in such inanimate things as the long belting
-in a factory, or the glowing line of a shooting
-star, and in the files of geese, or cattle, or marching
-men.</p>
-
-<p>A line may move in other directions besides that of
-its own length. It may swing stiffly from one end,
-as in the case of a pendulum or the rays from a searchlight.
-It may wave like a streamer in the breeze. It
-may move sidewise, as in the long lines of surf that
-roll up on the beach. It may move in countless other
-manners, as in the handling of canes, swords, spears,
-golf clubs, polo mallets, whips, etc. Now, of course,
-the director ordinarily thinks of a weapon as a weapon,
-and not as a moving line. He studies the characteristic
-action of an officer drawing his sword or of a
-Hottentot hurling his spear and tries to reproduce
-them faithfully so that no small boy in the audience
-may be able to pick out flaws. This is well, so far
-as it goes. A painter would study these characteristic
-actions, too, and would suggest them with equal
-faithfulness. But he would do something more. He
-would place every object so carefully in his picture
-that its line harmonized with the four lines of the
-frame and with all of the other lines, spots, and pictorial
-values in his work.</p>
-
-<p>Now we are beginning to guess how pictorial
-motions must be composed; but first let us see what
-other kinds of motion there are. If we take another
-look at the geese in the sky we may find that they
-have composed themselves into the form of a “V” or
-a “Y” floating strangely beneath the clouds. This<span class="pagenum" id="Page_90">90</span>
-illustrates the third type of motion, the moving pattern.</p>
-
-<p>We distinguish between a moving pattern and a
-moving spot or line, because a pattern relates its separate
-elements to each other. This relation may or may
-not change as the pattern moves. Thus the V-shaped
-pattern formed by the flying geese may become sharper
-or flatter, or one side may be stretched out longer than
-the other, as the flight continues. All fixed pictures
-are patterns which do not change in form while we
-look at them, and the pictorial principles therein involved
-have been thoroughly discussed in the preceding
-chapters. But if the director wants a pattern to
-move to the right or left, up or down, away from him
-or toward him, or to change its character gradually,
-then a new problem of composition arises, and the
-solution of this new problem is both inviting and perplexing.</p>
-
-<p>It is inviting because there are so many patterns
-which gain beauty from motion or change. A fixed
-circle is not so appealing to the eye, for example, as
-a rolling hoop. A wheel standing still is not so fascinating
-as one that rotates, like the wheel of a wind
-mill, or one that rolls, like the wheel of a carriage.
-Thus also the pattern formed by the rectangular shapes
-of a train standing still does not please the eye so
-much as the harmonious change in that same pattern
-when the train swings by us and winds away into
-the distance.</p>
-
-<p>The patterns which may be compared with mathematical
-figures, such as circles, squares, triangles, diamond
-shapes, etc., are not the only ones. We are
-simply mentioning them first to make our analysis<span class="pagenum" id="Page_91">91</span>
-clear. Every group of two or more visible things,
-and nearly every visible thing in itself, must of necessity
-be looked upon as a pattern, either pleasing or
-displeasing to the eye. Therefore every motion picture
-that has been, or can be, thrown upon the screen
-describes a pattern, fixed, moving, or changing. If
-the direction and rate of these motions and changes
-can be controlled, there is hope for beauty on the
-screen; if they cannot be controlled, there is no help
-but accident.</p>
-
-<p>A peculiar type of visible motion is that which we
-have elsewhere called “moving texture.” Examples
-in nature are the changing texture of falling snow,
-the stately coiling of clouds, and the majestic weaving
-of ice floes in a river. In the movies the effect of
-moving texture is produced whenever the elements of
-the subject are so many and so small that we view
-them rather as a surface than as a design or pattern.
-It may be seen, not only in subjects from nature, but
-also in such things as a mob of people or a closely
-packed herd of cattle viewed from a high position.
-Mr. Griffith has a good eye and taste for the composition
-of moving textures, and has furnished interesting
-examples in nearly all of his larger productions.</p>
-
-<p>Now let us see how far we have gone. We have
-defined four different types of pictorial motion,
-namely, the moving spot, the moving line, the moving
-pattern, and the moving texture. They may
-appear singly or grouped. For example, in a picture
-of the old-fashioned water wheel we have a combination
-of the moving line of the stream with the moving
-pattern of the wheel. And in a picture of a small
-motor boat, seen from afar, speeding over a lake the<span class="pagenum" id="Page_92">92</span>
-composition contains a moving spot, the changing
-pattern of the wake, and the changing texture of the
-water. If we add to this picture a long train on
-the bank, trailing a ribbon of smoke, an airplane in
-the sky, and a sailing yacht on the lake, we have a
-subject which is difficult indeed to analyze, and infinitely
-more difficult to compose into pictorial beauty.
-Yet those are the very kinds of motion which a motion
-picture director must compose in every scene that
-he “shoots.”</p>
-
-<p>But we have not yet completed our analysis of the
-nature of pictorial motion. It has still another property,
-which we shall call “changing tonal value.”
-Changing tonal value depends upon changes in the
-amount and kind of light which falls upon the subject,
-and upon changes in the surface of the subject
-itself. For example, the shadow of a cloud passing
-over a landscape gives a slightly different hue to every
-grove or meadow, to every rock or road. To watch
-these values come and go is one of the delights of the
-nature lover.</p>
-
-<p>Nature’s supreme example of the beauty of changing
-values may be seen in a sunset playing with delicate
-splendor on sea and sky. And if this beauty
-defies the skill of painters it is because they have no
-means of representing the subtle changes which run
-through any particular hue as the moments pass by.</p>
-
-<p>The beauty of a sunset may long, perhaps forever,
-elude the cinematograph, but this machine can produce
-tonal changes in black and white at the will of
-the operator by the familiar trick of “fading in” and
-“fading out.” This camera trick is of great service
-for dramatic effects, such as the dissolving of one<span class="pagenum" id="Page_93">93</span>
-picture into another; but it has a greater power, which
-has not always been appreciated and taken advantage
-of by directors, the power of producing for the eye
-a pictorial rhythm of tonal intensities. This effect
-is somewhat like the “crescendo” and “diminuendo”
-in music.</p>
-
-<div id="if_i_093" class="figcenter" style="max-width: 34em;">
- <img src="images/i_093.jpg" width="2157" height="1663" alt="" />
- <div class="caption">From <i>The Covered Wagon</i>. Distinctive rhythm of moving lines, interesting changes
-in pictorial pattern, and harmonious play of light and shade are skillfully used in this
-photoplay to intensify its dramatic meaning. See <a href="#Page_9">pages 9</a>, <a href="#Page_66">66</a> and <a href="#Page_140">140</a>.</div></div>
-
-<p>When we consider that changing tonal value may
-be combined with changing direction, as well as with
-changing velocity, of moving spots, moving lines, moving
-patterns, and moving textures, we realize more
-keenly the problems of the cinema composer. His
-medium is at once extremely complex, extremely flexible,
-and extremely delicate.</p>
-
-<p>But we have not yet revealed all of the strange qualities
-of the motion picture. A unique power of the
-screen, which can never be utilized by any other
-graphic art, is that which gives motion to things that
-are themselves absolutely at rest and immovable.
-Even the pyramids of Egypt can be invested with
-apparent motion, so that their sharp lines flow constantly
-into new patterns. It can be done by simply
-moving the camera itself while the film is being exposed.
-The appeal of apparent motion in natural
-setting is familiar to any one who has ever gazed
-dreamily from the window of a railroad car or from
-the deck of a yacht sailing among islands. Apparent
-motion on the screen makes a similar appeal, which
-can be enhanced by changing distance and point of
-view and by artistic combination with real motions
-in the picture.</p>
-
-<p>Still other fresh means of pleasing the eye may be
-found in the altering of natural motions, as by the
-retarding action of the slow-motion camera, which<span class="pagenum" id="Page_94">94</span>
-can make a horse float in the air like a real Pegasus;
-or by the cinematographic acceleration of motion
-which can out-rival an Indian conjuror in making a
-tree rise, blossom, and bear fruit while you are watching.</p>
-
-<p>Another peculiar type of pictorial motion, which
-has never before existed, and does not come into
-being until it is projected upon the screen, is the
-magic motion of the “animated cartoons.” The
-camera-man sees no such marvelous motions. He
-faces only a stack of drawings. The artist who makes
-the drawings does not see the motions except in his
-own imagination. But the spectator in the theater
-is delighted to see the strangely bewitched men and
-beasts, birds and trees, rocks and streams, weapons
-and machines, all behaving in impossible ways that
-no maker of fairy tales ever dreamed of. Here is
-a new field of pictorial composition, with distant
-boundaries and fabulous wealth. Those who exploit
-it will be able to teach many a valuable lesson to the
-director who merely takes photographs of actors in
-motion.</p>
-
-<p>Nearly all of these motions might be found in a
-single “shot,” that is, in a single section of film.
-But when these sections of film are joined together
-to form the finished photoplay they produce still another
-kind of motion, a constant shifting from scene
-to scene. Whether this succession is to be a series
-of collisions or a harmonious flow, depends upon those
-who cut and join the films.</p>
-
-<p>There is finally the total movement which is the
-product of all of these motions working together.
-A scientist can show you in his laboratory that when<span class="pagenum" id="Page_95">95</span>
-a cord vibrates in one way it gives forth a particular
-note, and that when the same cord vibrates in another
-way it gives forth a different note. He can also show
-you that a single cord can vibrate in several different
-ways at the same time. The tones and overtones
-thus produced constitute the peculiar <em>timbre</em>, or quality,
-of a musical note. Thus, too, in a motion picture
-the <em>ensemble</em> of all the kinds, directions, and velocities
-of motion constitutes the particular cinematic quality
-of that particular picture play. Whether that
-resultant quality shall be like a symphony or like the
-cries of a mad-house, depends on the knowledge, the
-skill, and the inspiration of the cinema composer.</p>
-
-<p>Having named the principal motions in a picture
-we come now to the question of how those motions
-should be composed. When a musical composer sits
-down before his piano he knows that he may strike
-single notes in succession, giving a simple melody, or
-several notes at the same moment, producing a chord,
-or he may play a melody with one hand and a different
-melody with the other, or he may play a melody
-with one hand and a succession of chords with the
-other, or he may use both hands in playing two successions
-of chords. Before he is through with his
-composition he will probably have done all of those
-things.</p>
-
-<p>It is much the same with the cinema composer.
-Before he has finished even a single scene he will
-probably have produced all of the different types of
-motions in varying directions, with varying velocities,
-and varying intensities. How may he know whether
-his work is good or bad? What are the proofs of
-beauty in the composition of pictorial motion?</p>
-
-<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_96">96</span></p>
-
-<p>A practical proof is dramatic utility. The motions
-of a photoplay are in the service of the story. They
-should perform that work well, without waste of time
-and energy. An æsthetic proof is their power to stimulate
-our fancy and to sway our feeling. Pictorial
-motions should play for us, until by the illusion of
-art we can play with them. Another proof is reposefulness.
-For at the very moment when we are stimulated
-by art we desire to rest in satisfied contemplation.
-How pictorial motions may produce beauty on
-the screen by being at work, at play, and at rest will
-be told in the following chapters.</p>
-
-<hr />
-
-<div id="toclink_97" class="chapter">
-<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_97">97</span></p>
-
-<h2 class="nobreak" id="CHAPTER_VII">CHAPTER VII<br />
-
-<span class="subhead">PICTORIAL MOTIONS AT WORK</span></h2>
-</div>
-
-<p class="in0"><span class="firstword">All</span> the movement which you see on the screen may
-be enjoyed, we have said, as something which appears
-beautiful to your eye, regardless of its meaning to
-your mind. But if that movement, beautiful in itself,
-also carries to your mind some significance, if it serves
-the dramatic plot in some positive way, then the picture
-will be so much the richer. Acting, of course,
-is visible movement that delineates character and advances
-plot. It is pictorial motion at work. And acting,
-curiously enough, is not limited to people and
-animals. In a sense there may be acting also by
-things, by wagons or trees or brooks or waves or
-water-falls or fountains or flames or smoke or clouds
-or wind-blown garments. The motions of these
-things also constitute a kind of work in the service
-of the photoplay.</p>
-
-<p>One might say that the artistic efficiency of a motion
-picture may be partly tested in the same way
-as the practical value of a machine. In either case
-motions are no good unless they help to perform some
-work. “Lost motions” are a waste, and resisting motions
-are a hindrance. The best mechanical combination
-of motions, then, is that which results in the
-most work with the least expenditure of energy.</p>
-
-<p>Doubtless every one will agree with us that if, while<span class="pagenum" id="Page_98">98</span>
-a picture is showing, any great work is necessary to
-“get the story across,” that work should be done by
-the picture and not by the spectators. They want
-the story to be clear, and they want it to be impressive.
-In other words, they want beautiful and significant
-material presented with the fullest emphasis.
-Emphasis results when the attention of the spectator
-is caught and held by the primary interest in the picture,
-instead of the secondary interest. In paintings,
-or in “still” pictures, or in those parts of moving pictures
-which are held or remembered as fixed moments,
-a great number of devices may be used separately or
-together to control the attention of the spectator so
-that the main interest gets its full emphasis. Pictorial
-motions on the screen may also be so well organized
-that they will catch and control the spectator’s attention,
-and will reveal the dynamic vitality of the pictorial
-content.</p>
-
-<p>The simplest principle of accent by motion is so
-obvious that we are almost ashamed to name it. It
-is this, that if in the whole picture everything remains
-at rest except one thing which moves, that thing will
-attract our attention. Photoplays are full of mistakes
-which arise through the violation of this simple law.
-In many a scene our attention is drawn from the stalwart
-hero to a candle on the mantlepiece merely because
-its flame happens to flicker; or from the heroine’s
-sweet face to a common bush merely because its
-leaves happen to quiver in the breeze; or from the
-villain’s steady pistol to a dog’s tail merely because
-the dog happens to wag it.</p>
-
-<p>It is no excuse to say that such motions are natural,
-or that they give local color. For, though a moving<span class="pagenum" id="Page_99">99</span>
-trifle may help to give the correct atmosphere, it may
-also at the same time rob the heroine of the attention
-which is rightly due her. For example, in “The Love
-Light,” which was conceived and directed by Frances
-Marion, there is the kitchen of the little Italian home
-where Angela (Mary Pickford) sits down to muse
-for a while. She occupies the right side of the picture
-while at the left is the fire-place with a brisk
-fire. The fanciful playing of the flames and smoke
-of that fire catch our attention immediately. We guess
-that this fire-place is not important in the story, and
-we turn our glances upon the heroine, but we cannot
-keep them there because the fire is too interesting.</p>
-
-<p>When the spectator’s reason tries to make him do
-one thing and his natural inclination tempts him to
-do the opposite, there is confusion and waste of mental
-energy; and during that hesitation of mind the
-opportunity for being impressed by the main interest
-of the play passes by. That rule may sound like a
-commonplace, but it is not nearly so commonplace
-as the violation of it in the movies.</p>
-
-<p>If the director must have a fire in the fire-place,
-and if Angela is more important than that fire, then,
-of course, her motions should be made more interesting
-than its motions. It should always be remembered
-that the strangest, least familiar of two motions
-will attract our attention away from the other. The
-fire is strange, while Angela is familiar. In the preceding
-scenes she has walked, run, romped, laughed,
-cried, talked, and made faces; she has, in short, performed
-so many different kinds of motions that there
-is almost nothing unexpected left for her to do in
-order to take our eyes away from the fire. She<span class="pagenum" id="Page_100">100</span>
-merely sits for a long time unnoticed. Presently,
-however, after the fire has lost its novelty for us, she
-arises, grasps a frying pan, and, using it as a mirror,
-begins to primp. Then at last we look at her.</p>
-
-<p>A more striking case of misplaced emphasis may
-be found in the photoplay “Sherlock Holmes,” directed
-by Albert Parker. The part of the great detective
-was played by no less a person than John Barrymore,
-yet in the very scene where he makes his first appearance
-he is totally eclipsed by a calico cow. In this
-scene, represented by the “still” opposite this page,
-we see a beautifully patterned cow swinging into the
-idyllic setting of a side street in Cambridge, following
-a rhythmic path from the background with its dim
-towers of the university, past the honeysuckle-clad
-walls of “Ye Cheshire Cheese,” and out into the shadows
-of a picturesque tree. This cow holds our attention
-by her photographic contrasts of black and white,
-and because she and her attendant are the only moving
-things within the whole scope of the camera.
-This inscrutable cow gets the spotlight while the great
-Sherlock is neglected where he reclines drowsily in
-the shade. Here was really the most pictorial scene
-of the whole photoplay, and the annoying thing was
-that the cow never again showed hoof or horn. Why
-was she ever let in? No suspicion of murder, theft,
-or other deviltry was ever cast upon her. She neither
-shielded nor shamed any one. She did not help to
-solve any problem. There was no further allusion to
-cattle, dairies, or cheese. There was not even a glass
-of milk in the rest of the play.</p>
-
-<div id="if_i_100a" class="figcenter" style="max-width: 27em;">
- <img src="images/i_100a.jpg" width="1718" height="1357" alt="" />
- <div class="caption">A typical bad movie composition from an old film. But the pictorial
-mistakes here illustrated may be seen in some of the most recent productions.
-Intelligent criticism by spectators would soon make such
-careless directing intolerable. See <a href="#Page_75">page 75</a>.</div></div>
-
-<div id="if_i_100b" class="figcenter" style="max-width: 28em;">
- <img src="images/i_100b.jpg" width="1757" height="1244" alt="" />
- <div class="caption">From <i>Sherlock Holmes</i>. An example of wrong emphasis. The cow
-attracts attention by her strong marking, the central position, and because
-she is the only moving thing in the picture. But the cow should not
-have been dragged in at all, much less accented. See <a href="#Page_100">page 100</a>.</div></div>
-
-<p>Perhaps the innocent cow was an accident. Perhaps
-the director did not know, or had forgotten,<span class="pagenum" id="Page_101">101</span>
-that the whitest patch in a picture attracts the eye,
-that an irregular shape, such as the marking of a
-Holstein cow, attracts more attention than the familiar
-patterning of walls, windows, tree trunks, etc.,
-that a moving object in a scene where everything
-else is still attracts and holds attention, and that a
-humble cow emphasized by all these cinematographic
-means makes more of a hit than the most highly paid
-actor dozing in the shade.</p>
-
-<p>But the strangeness or novelty of a motion may
-emphasize it, even though other motions going on at
-the same time are larger and stronger. In support
-of this statement the author offers a personal experience
-which came in the nature of a surprise when
-first seeing Niagara Falls. One would think that if a
-person who had never seen this sight were placed
-suddenly before it, he would gaze spellbound at the
-awful rush of water, and that no other motion could
-possibly distract him. But the author’s attention was
-first attracted to something else which impressed him
-more deeply, something which moved silently, very
-slowly and very delicately. That strangely attractive
-thing was the cloud of spray that rose steadily from
-the bottom of the fall, floating gently upward past
-the brink and vanishing continually in the sky. Its
-peculiar appeal lay in its strangeness, not in its
-strength.</p>
-
-<p>The reader can doubtless recall similar cases where
-strangeness exerted an overpowering appeal. At best
-that strangeness is much more than the satisfaction
-of curiosity. It is a type of beauty which comes as
-a relief from the common, familiar facts of every-day
-life. The combination of strangeness and beauty has<span class="pagenum" id="Page_102">102</span>
-a powerful charm, and he is an ideal director who
-can emphasize dramatic significance with that charm.</p>
-
-<p>Violence, at least, is not a virtue in the movies, as
-so many directors seem to believe. Indeed, slowness
-and slightness may sometimes be more impressive than
-speed and volume. This is often demonstrated on
-the stage of the spoken drama, when, for example,
-the leading lady who speaks slowly and in low tones
-holds our interest better than her attendants who
-chatter in high pitch. The beauty of her speech is
-emphasized by its contrast with the ugliness of the
-others. So in the photoplay there may be more power
-in a single slight lowering of the eyes or in the firm
-clenching of a fist than in a storm of waving arms
-and heaving chests.</p>
-
-<p>What has just been said refers to motions in a fixed
-setting, which operate either against or in spite of,
-each other; but two or more motions in a picture may
-work as a team, and may thus control our attention
-better than if they were operating singly.</p>
-
-<p>First we observe that if a single object is moving
-along in a continuous direction it will pull our attention
-along in that direction, may, indeed, send our
-attention on ahead of the object. Thus if an actor
-swings his hand dramatically in the direction of a
-door he may carry our glance beyond his hand to
-the door itself. This law of vision works so surely
-that it can always be depended upon by a magician,
-a highly specialized kind of actor, when he wishes
-to divert the attention of his audience from some
-part of the stage or of his own person where a trick
-is being prepared. It is not true, as is popularly supposed,
-that we are deceived because “the hand is<span class="pagenum" id="Page_103">103</span>
-faster than the eye”; it is really because the eye is
-faster than the hand. In other words, our attention
-outstrips the moving object.</p>
-
-<p>In the movies this law controls our attention to
-traveling persons, vehicles, and things. If horsemen
-are represented as riding away they should be photographed
-with their backs toward us and with the
-distance between us and them increasing. Then, since
-our eyes travel beyond the riders, we get a stronger
-impression that the men are really riding far away.
-On the other hand, if the horsemen are coming home,
-the direction of movement should naturally be toward
-us. This seems clear enough; yet directors frequently
-prevent us from feeling the dramatic intent and force
-of travel, by “shooting” the moving subject from
-various angles in succession. Even Mr. Griffith has
-been guilty of this sort of carelessness. In “The Idol
-Dancer,” for example, we have a scene (a) in which
-a party of South Sea island villagers are paddling
-away in a large canoe; correctly enough they are moving
-away from the camera. The next scene (b) shows
-some one raising an alarm in the village by beating
-a drum, which, as we have been informed, can be
-heard twenty miles away. It is a call to the canoe
-party to return. The scene which is then flashed on
-(c) is a close-up of the canoe coming toward the
-camera. The men are paddling vigorously. We think,
-of course, that they have already heard the alarm and
-are now returning. But no! Presently they stop paddling
-and listen. They hear the drum. The next picture
-(d), a “long shot,” shows the canoe being
-maneuvered around, and the succeeding pictures all
-show the men paddling toward the camera.</p>
-
-<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_104">104</span></p>
-
-<p>Now it is perfectly logical for us to infer that the
-canoe is already homeward bound, when we see it
-coming toward us in scene “c” immediately after
-the drum has sounded the alarm, and we can therefore
-only resent being caught in error and virtually
-told, two scenes later, “This time we won’t fool
-you, now the canoe, as you see, is really turning
-about.”</p>
-
-<p>If one moving object can send our thoughts ahead
-to the goal of its travel, two or more objects moving
-toward the same point can send our thoughts there
-with greatly increased force. Thus a picture of two
-ships shown approaching each other on converging
-courses will surely make us think of that region of
-the sea where they are likely to come close aboard
-each other. If there is an enemy submarine at that
-point and if the two vessels are destroyers, the suspense
-and emphasis is complete.</p>
-
-<p>A similar law of attention may be seen at work in
-cases where lines move along their length to a junction.
-Suppose we take as a setting a western landscape
-in which two swiftly flowing streams meet and
-form the figure of a “Y.” Suppose now that we
-desire to place an Indian camp in this setting so carefully
-that it will attract attention as soon as the picture
-is flashed on the screen. We must place it at
-the junction of the two streams, because the eyes of
-the spectators will naturally be drawn to that point.
-Now suppose that a long white road crosses the main
-stream just below the place where the tributaries meet.
-The position would be emphasized more than ever
-because the road would virtually form two fixed lines
-leading toward the bridge; and fixed lines, as we saw<span class="pagenum" id="Page_105">105</span>
-in Chapter IV, also have the power of directing our
-attention to the point where a crossing is made.</p>
-
-<p>Then let us suppose that the Indians build a fire,
-from which the smoke rises in a tall, thin column.
-That would constitute another line of motion. But
-would it emphasize or weaken the center of interest?
-It would, as a matter of fact, still hold our attention
-on the camp because of the curious law that, no matter
-in what directions lines may move, it is the point
-which they have in common that attracts our attention.
-Thus if we assume a landscape where there
-is only a single stream, with a camp at the upper
-end, and with smoke rising from a fire, we would
-still have emphasis on the camp, in spite of the fact
-that the two lines of motion are directed away from it.</p>
-
-<p>The same curious power over our attention may be
-exercised by moving spots. If we see, for example,
-two ships sailing away on diverging courses, we immediately
-suppose that the ships are sailing out of
-the same port, and, even though we cannot see any
-sign of that port, our minds will search for it. So
-also in those electric advertisements where lines of
-fire, sprayed from a central source, rise and curve over
-into the various letters of a word, the emphasis is
-rather on the point where the lines originate than on
-any single letter or on the word as a whole. Electric
-signs, by the way, are surprisingly often examples of
-what not to do with motion if one desires to catch the
-eye and to strike deep into the mind and emotions of
-the observer. The most common mistake, perhaps,
-is the sign consisting of a word in steady light surrounded
-by a flashing border in which a stream of
-fire flows continuously from dusk till dawn. Our<span class="pagenum" id="Page_106">106</span>
-eyes chase madly around with this motion and have
-no chance to rest upon the word for which the advertiser
-is wasting his money.</p>
-
-<p>But, to return to the question of how motions running
-away from each other can throw the spectator’s
-attention to the point where they originate, we can
-think of no more perfect example in nature than the
-effect which is produced by throwing a pebble into a
-pool. Ripples form themselves immediately into expanding
-rings which seem to pursue each other steadily
-away from a common center. Yet, despite the outward
-motion of these rings our eyes constantly seek
-the point from which they so mysteriously arise.
-That this is true every reader has experienced for
-himself. Here then we have discovered a fascinating
-paradox of motion, namely, that a thing may sometimes
-be caught by running away from it. This ought
-to be good news to many a movie director.</p>
-
-<p>But let us see what other means there are of emphasizing
-a theme or some other feature of significant
-beauty in a photoplay. One method is repetition.
-But what is the effect of repetition? Is it monotony
-or emphasis? Does it dull our senses or sharpen
-them? There can be no doubt that the steady repetition
-of the sea waves breaking on the beach, or of
-rain drops dripping on our roofs, or of leaves rustling
-in the forest, or of flames leaping in our fire-places
-can send us into the forgetfulness of sleep. But, on
-the other hand, the periodic repetition of a movement
-in a dance, or of a motif in music, or of a refrain in
-poetry can drive that movement, that motif, or that
-refrain so deeply into our souls that we never forget
-it. We refer, of course, to the higher forms of dancing,<span class="pagenum" id="Page_107">107</span>
-music, and poetry; for in the lower forms, such
-as the dancing of savages, the grinding of hand organs,
-and the “sing-song” of uninspired recitations the too
-frequent repetition soon results in monotony.</p>
-
-<p>In the movies of to-day there is, we are glad to
-observe, very little bad repetition except that of close-ups,
-and even they are now more and more eliminated
-by directors. But there is also very little good repetition
-in the cause of artistic emphasis. The tendency
-is rather a touch and run. Seventy settings are used
-where seventeen would give us a stronger sense of
-environment. We read more publicity “dope” about
-a woman who can do a hundred “stunts” in five reels
-than about one who can strike a single enthralling
-pose, and can return to it again and again until it
-becomes as unforgettable as a masterpiece of sculpture.</p>
-
-<p>The photoplay needs repetition, especially because
-of the fact that any pictorial motion or moment must
-by its very nature vanish while we look. Hence, unless
-all other circumstances are especially favorable for
-emphasis, such a motion or moment may vanish from
-our minds as well as from the screen. To fix these
-fleeting values is a problem, but it can be solved without
-the danger of monotony if each repetition is provided
-with a variety of approach, or if each repetition
-is made under a variety of circumstances. This is
-the method in music. A particular series of notes is
-struck and serves for a theme; then the melody wanders
-off into a maze of harmony and returns to the
-theme, only to wander off again into a new harmony
-and to return from a new direction to the same theme.
-After a while this musical theme, thus repeated with
-a variety of approach, penetrates our souls and remains<span class="pagenum" id="Page_108">108</span>
-imbedded there long after the performance has ceased.
-The same method is often employed to give emphasis
-to a particular movement or pose in æsthetic dancing.</p>
-
-<p>To show how repetition with variety of approach
-may operate on the screen let us remake in imagination
-some scenes from Griffith’s “Broken Blossoms,”
-a photoplay which was adapted from Thomas Burke’s
-short story “The Chink and the Child.” The wistful
-heroine, called simply The Girl, played charmingly
-by Lillian Gish, is shown in the wretched hovel of her
-father, “Battling” Burrows, a prize-fighter. We see
-her against a background of fading and broken walls,
-a bare table, a couple of chairs, a cot, and a stove.
-If she sits down, stands up, lies down, or walks across
-the room, she moves, of course, through a changing
-pattern of motion against fixed lines. And she ends
-each movement in a different fixed design. Now let
-us suppose that the most pictorial of all these arrested
-moments is the one which is struck when she pauses
-before an old mirror to gaze sadly at her own pathetic
-image, and that during this moment we see, not only
-the best arrangement of lines, patterns, and tones, and
-the best phase of all her bodily movements, but also
-the most emotional expression of her tragic situation
-as the slave of her brutal father. Wouldn’t it be a
-pity if this pictorial moment were to occur once only
-during the play? How much more impressive it would
-be if she paused often before this mirror, always
-striking the same dramatic note. Such a pause would
-be quite natural immediately after she enters the
-room or when she is about to go out, or during her
-weary shuffling between the stove and the table while
-serving supper, or after she has arisen from a spell<span class="pagenum" id="Page_109">109</span>
-of crying on the cot and tries to shape her tear-stained
-face into a smile. In all of these cases there would
-be variety and yet emphasis, always the same tonal
-harmony between her blond hair and the faded wall,
-always the same resemblance between the lines of
-her ragged dress and those of the old furniture, always
-the same binding of her frail figure into the hard pattern
-of her surroundings, as though she were but
-a thing to be kicked about and broken,—all this shown
-again and again until the full dramatic force and
-beauty of the pictorial moment is impressed upon the
-spectator.</p>
-
-<p>This kind of repetition can be done much more
-effectively and with less danger of monotony in the
-photoplay than in the stage play, because much of
-the action which intervenes between the repetitions
-can be eliminated and other scenes can be cut in without
-breaking the continuity of visible motion, while on
-the stage no bridging of time or shifting of scene is
-feasible without dropping the curtain.</p>
-
-<p>One device which is unique on the screen is the
-repetition of the same “shot” by simply cutting into
-the film numerous prints from a single negative. A
-well-remembered case was the “Out-of-the-cradle
-endlessly-rocking” theme of Griffith’s “Intolerance,” a
-picture of a young woman rocking a cradle, which
-was repeated at frequent intervals throughout the
-story. The picture remained the same, but the context
-was ever new; and, if the repetition was not
-impressive to the spectators, the fault was not in the
-device itself, but rather in the fact that there really
-was no very clear connection between the cradle-rocking
-and intolerance.</p>
-
-<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_110">110</span></p>
-
-<p>Whenever we speak of emphasis in art we are
-naturally concerned about emphasizing that which is
-vital in the theme or story. We do not, for example,
-emphasize a man’s suspenders in a portrait where the
-main theme is grief. Nor need we, for that matter,
-emphasize tears; for a man might show as much grief
-with his shoulders as with a wet handkerchief. In
-other words, if the theme is grief we should emphasize
-grief itself rather than any particular gesture of
-grief.</p>
-
-<p>Similarly if in a romantic story the main theme is
-dashing sword play, it is swordsmanship which should
-be stressed, and not the sword itself, unless, of course,
-that sword happens to have some magic property.
-Therefore it is bad art in “The Mark of Zorro,” a
-Douglas Fairbanks play, to repeat with every sub-title
-a conventional sketch of a sword. It is bad, not
-only because the hero’s sword needs no emphasis, but
-because a mere decorative drawing of a sword cannot
-reinforce the significance of the real sword which the
-hero so gallantly wields.</p>
-
-<p>There is a recurring note, however, in this play
-which can be commended. It is the “Z” shaped mark
-or wound which Zorro makes with his sword. We
-see it first as an old scar on the cheek of a man whom
-Zorro has reprimanded. Then we see Zorro himself
-trace the mark on a bulletin board from which he
-tears down a notice. Then we see him cut the
-dreaded “Z” upon the neck of an antagonist. And,
-finally, we see him, some days later, fix his weird mark
-squarely on the brow of his old enemy. And in every
-case except the first we observe the quick zigzag motion
-of the avenging sword.</p>
-
-<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_111">111</span></p>
-
-<p>Here the emphasis lies in the repetition of a pictorial
-element with some variety of shape and movement
-and under a variety of circumstances. The
-“mark” of Zorro becomes a sharp symbol which
-inscribes ever anew upon our minds the character of
-the hero, his dashing pursuit and lightning retribution.</p>
-
-<p>Emphasis by repetition in the photoplay may further
-be achieved in ways which we shall not take the time
-to discuss. Thus an especially significant setting may
-be repeated in various lights and in combination with
-various actions; or some particular action, such as a
-dramatic dance, may be repeated in a variety of
-settings.</p>
-
-<p>A sure means of emphasis is contrast. We have
-already shown how this principle works in cases where
-a moving thing is contrasted with other things which
-are at rest. Yet the contrast in such cases works only
-in one direction. That is to say, the contrast throws
-the attention on the motion, but it does not at the
-same time draw any attention to the fixed objects.
-It will be interesting now to illustrate a sort of double-acting
-contrast which may produce great emphasis in
-pictures. In the well-known case where a tall man
-stands beside a short one on a stage the difference
-between them is emphasized by the contrast in their
-statures; and when we meet them off the stage we
-are surprised to discover that one is not so tall, and
-the other not so short, as we had been led to believe.
-In a photograph, for a similar reason, if a very black
-tone is placed sharply along a very white one, each
-tone will make the other seem more intense. And if
-a painter desires to emphasize a color, say red, in his
-painting he does not need to do so by spreading more<span class="pagenum" id="Page_112">112</span>
-paint over the first coat. Red may be accented by
-placing green beside it. In fact, each of these two
-colors can accent the other by contrast.</p>
-
-<p>Similarly when two motions occur together the contrast
-between them may be double-acting. When you
-are setting your watch, for example, the minute-hand
-seems to run faster, and the hour-hand more slowly,
-than is actually true, because of the contrast in their
-rates of speed. This simple law might well be applied
-in the movies when emphasis of motion is required.
-We would thus get the effect of speed upon the mind
-without the annoyance of speed for the eye.</p>
-
-<p>One does not have to be a critic to realize that there
-is entirely too much speed on the screen. Some of
-this dizzy swiftness is due to imperfect projection or
-to the worn-out condition of the film; witness the
-flicker and the “rain” of specks and lines. Much of
-it is due also to the fact that the projection is “speeded
-up” to a faster rate than that of the actual performance
-before the camera. But there is also a lamentable
-straining for effect by many directors who believe
-that an unnaturally fast tempo gives life and sparkle
-to the action. Perhaps some of these directors have
-not been able to forget a lesson learned during their
-stage experience. In the spoken drama it has long
-been a tradition that actors must speak more rapidly,
-and must pick up their cues more promptly, than
-people do in real life, in order that the play may not
-seem to drag. But we know that the motion picture
-is in danger of racing rather than dragging. And
-racing, as we have said, hurts the eyes.</p>
-
-<p>The principle of contrast can relieve the eye of a
-part of its work without imposing any additional task<span class="pagenum" id="Page_113">113</span>
-upon the mind. Thus some crazy Don Quixote may
-<em>seem</em> to cut and thrust with greater agility than the
-fighting which we actually <em>see</em>, provided his action is
-contrasted with the restful poking of his ham-fed servant,
-Sancho Panza. And thus a railroad train which
-really was running at a moderate speed, might <em>seem</em>
-to dash by on the screen, if it were contrasted with
-the ambling gait of a farmer’s team driven in the
-same direction along the tracks.</p>
-
-<p>A kind of emphasis which we may classify as contrast
-is that which occurs when movement is suddenly
-arrested. The unexpected stop not only makes
-the previous motion seem faster than it really was,
-but it also fixes attention more alertly on the thing
-which has just stopped moving. When you bump
-against a chair in the darkness you are always astonished
-to find that you were dashing along instead of
-merely walking slowly. But the shock has deceived
-you, for you really were walking slowly. If you are
-out hunting and your setter stops in his tracks, your
-eye is immediately upon him, and will remain so fixed
-until he or something else makes the next move. The
-same principle works on the screen. If an actor, or
-an animal, or a thing is in motion and then unexpectedly
-pauses, the effect of the pause is to attract immediate
-attention, as well as to make the previous motion
-seem to have been faster than it actually was. Sometimes
-this law may operate to distract our attention
-from the dramatic interest. If, for example, an outdoor
-scene has been “shot” on a squally day, and the
-wind has abruptly died down for a few moments
-during the climax of the scene, the effect on the screen
-will be to attract our attention instantly to the leaves<span class="pagenum" id="Page_114">114</span>
-which have stopped fluttering, or the garments which
-have stopped flapping. We will observe the sudden
-change in the weather and forget the state of the
-story.</p>
-
-<p>With this argument we ourselves shall pause, in
-order to summarize the principal ways in which pictorial
-motions, working singly or together, can produce
-the greatest impression on the spectator with the
-least expenditure of his mental energy. Here is the
-list: A thing in motion is normally more emphatic
-than anything at rest in the same picture. Of two
-motions the one which is the more surprising or fanciful
-gets the chief attention. Slowness or slightness
-may sometimes by contrast be more emphatic than
-great speed or volume. A moving spot or a line flowing
-along its own length has a tendency to carry
-attention along with, or even ahead of, itself in the
-direction of movement. Two or more movements
-along well-marked lines, whether converging or diverging,
-focus attention on the point which these lines
-have in common. Lines moving in circles away from
-a common center hold attention on that center. Repetition
-can work for emphasis without monotony, provided
-it be a repetition with variety of circumstances.
-Contrast between two simultaneous motions or between
-a motion and an abrupt rest may be double-acting,
-that is, may emphasize in both directions.</p>
-
-<p>Our discussion of motions at work in a picture has
-not been exhaustive. The list might easily be made
-three times as long as it is. But it is long enough to
-illustrate the evil which motions may do if they are
-turned wild on the screen, and the good which they
-may work if they are harnessed by a director who<span class="pagenum" id="Page_115">115</span>
-understands these fundamental principles of pictorial
-composition.</p>
-
-<p>However, all work and no play would make any
-picture dull, but that is a subject for another chapter.</p>
-
-<hr />
-
-<div id="toclink_116" class="chapter">
-<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_116">116</span></p>
-
-<h2 class="nobreak" id="CHAPTER_VIII">CHAPTER VIII<br />
-
-<span class="subhead">PICTORIAL MOTIONS AT PLAY</span></h2>
-</div>
-
-<p class="in0"><span class="firstword">The</span> average matter-of-fact man thinks that artists
-concern themselves only with copying their subjects,
-and that their success as artists consists in copying
-correctly. He is satisfied with a painted portrait of
-his wife, provided it is a “speaking likeness,” and he
-craves no other magic of design and color. Such a
-man praises a photoplay if it presents a “rattling good
-story,” and expects no thrill from the cinema composer’s
-conjuring with shifting patterns and evanescent
-tones. At least he would say something to that
-effect if you argued the matter with him. But he
-would be mistaken in his self-analysis, for even a
-prosaic person really enjoys the decorative rhythmical
-quality in a picture, though he may not be conscious
-of doing so. And every spectator can get the richest
-beauty from the screen only when the pictorial motions
-play as well as they work.</p>
-
-<p>What is the difference between play and work? We
-know that when our work most resembles play it is
-most enjoyable. And we know, too, that play, even
-when it has not been professionalized, often comes
-very near being work. The playing of children, as
-that of grown-ups, is often very highly organized and
-pursued with a great deal of effort and earnestness.
-Play, however, may be characterized by spontaneity<span class="pagenum" id="Page_117">117</span>
-and variety. It is not forced, like work, which aims
-for some definite practical result; and it does not have
-the rigidity and uniformity which in work sometimes
-develops into dullness. If the emphasizing of dramatic
-expression may be called the work of pictorial
-motions, then the spontaneity and variety which accompanies
-this work may be called the play of pictorial
-motions. And that play is essentially the same as
-rhythm.</p>
-
-<p>We think immediately of two of the elder arts in
-which rhythm is all important—dancing and music.
-Music leads us to the thought of song, and poetry,
-and oratory, arts which also are dependent on rhythm.
-Dancing suggests sculpture, and sculpture suggests
-painting, arts which would have little beauty without
-the quality of rhythm. Even architecture must have
-it. From art we turn to nature, and we see the poignant
-beauty of rhythm in cloud and wave, in tree and
-flower, in brook and mountain, in bird and beast. The
-motion picture, which is the mirror of nature, and
-at the same time the tablet upon which all of the
-elder arts may write their laws, must bring to us
-the inheritance and reflection of rhythm.</p>
-
-<p>This quality has already been discussed in connection
-with the laws of the eye, in Chapter III, and in
-connection with static composition, in Chapter V. We
-come now to the pictorial problem of weaving the
-individual and combined motions of a photoplay into a
-totality of rhythm. First, let us consider the case of
-a single moving spot. Suppose that we have before
-us a barren hillside of Mexico, an expanse of light
-gray on the screen. Down that hillside a horseman is
-to come, dark against the gray. If he rides in a<span class="pagenum" id="Page_118">118</span>
-single straight line, directly toward the camera or
-obliquely down the hill, his movement will not be
-pleasing to the eye, nor will it seem natural. But if
-he moves in a waving line, a series of reverse curves
-freely made, the effect on the eye of the spectator will
-be somewhat like that of the “line of beauty” discussed
-in Chapter V.</p>
-
-<p>An important difference, however, between a fixed
-line and one traced by a moving object is that the
-latter disappears as soon as it is drawn. It may linger
-in our memories, to be sure, yet our eyes can trace
-that line only once, and only in the direction taken by
-the moving object. That is, our physical eye cannot
-range back and forth over the vanished path, as it
-can over a fixed line. And a still greater difference
-is that the moving object has a rhythm of velocity as
-well as a rhythm of direction. Velocity and direction
-of movement arise and exist together, and consequently
-their relation to each other may produce a
-new rhythm. The horse, varying his pace according
-to the nature of the ground, may gallop along the
-level stretches, and may pick his way cautiously down
-the steep declines. There is natural harmony in
-rapid motion over a long smooth line, and slow motion
-over a short jagged one. A simple case like this may
-help us to answer the question, When is the relation
-between velocity and direction harmonious? But we
-have still the fundamental questions, When is a change
-of direction rhythmical? And, when is a change of
-velocity rhythmical?</p>
-
-<p>We cannot promise to give direct and definite answers
-to these questions; but, recalling our discussion
-in Chapter V concerning rhythm in fixed design, let<span class="pagenum" id="Page_119">119</span>
-us say that cinematic rhythm is a peculiar alternation
-of phases or properties of pictorial motion which
-gives the spectator a vivid sense of movement performed
-with ease and variety.</p>
-
-<p>Now it may seem a vain task to analyze or try to
-define so delicate a thing as rhythm, because all of
-us can be carried away by rhythm without saddling
-it with a formula. Yet analysis will serve a useful
-purpose if it can help the director to avoid motions
-which are not rhythmical and if it can help the thoughtful
-spectator to fix the blame for the jumble of unrhythmical
-motions which he now so often sees on the
-screen.</p>
-
-<p>Suppose we make a few tests upon the horseman
-coming down the hillside. If he moves in a perfectly
-straight line at a perfectly steady pace, the action will
-seem to be a forced, hard effort exerted without
-variety. No rhythm will be there. But if he moves,
-even without change of pace, along a path of flowing
-curves, we will sense a rhythm of direction, providing
-the horse seems to follow the winding path freely
-and without undue effort.</p>
-
-<p>If, without change of direction, the horse frequently
-alters his gait from a gallop to a walk and back to a
-gallop again in equal periods of time, say half a
-minute each, it will be apparent that ease and variety
-are utterly absent from the movement. And even if
-the horse follows a winding path and changes gait
-at such regular intervals the rhythm in direction will
-be neutralized by the lack of rhythm in velocity. If,
-however, there is a progression of varying directions,
-varying gaits, and varying durations of time which
-appear to be spontaneously and easily performed, a<span class="pagenum" id="Page_120">120</span>
-progression, moreover, in which both the similarities
-and the differences of the various phases can instantly
-be perceived by the spectator, he will immediately
-experience the emotion of rhythmical movement.</p>
-
-<p>The above example illustrates how a single spot can
-move rhythmically over the area of a picture. A
-moving line, say a column of soldiers on the march,
-may have still more rhythm. We get a hint of this
-from the “still,” facing <a href="#Page_133">page 133</a>. It represents a
-scene from the Metro production of Ibanez’s “Four
-Horsemen of the Apocalypse,” which was directed by
-Rex Ingram. We see there that the soldiers describe
-a path of alternate curves, instead of the straight lines
-and square corners which a less imaginative director
-would have ordered. Mr. Ingram has further heightened
-the rhythm by placing gaps here and there in the
-main column, and by introducing a secondary movement
-in the detachment which turns off from the road
-just before reaching the village. These movements
-are truly pictorial in composition; yet their meaning
-is none the less military and dramatic.</p>
-
-<p>In the scene just described the various motions are
-similar, and the handling of them is therefore comparatively
-easy. But it is very difficult to make a
-rhythmical combination of motions which differ
-widely in character. In “The Dumb Girl of Portici,”
-for instance, we are shown Pavlowa dancing on the
-beach, while the stately waves and pounding surf of
-the ocean fill most of the area of the screen. But
-there is no rhythm in the combined movements of that
-picture. The dancer without the sea, or the sea without
-the dancer, might have been perfectly rhythmical.
-But when we try to view them together in this photoplay<span class="pagenum" id="Page_121">121</span>
-we get only the strong clash between their movements,
-and we feel no pleasure when shifting our
-gaze from one to the other.</p>
-
-<p>Perhaps the picture might have been a success if
-the dancer’s ground had been a bank sufficiently high
-to mask the severe effect of the surf, yet permitting a
-view of the incoming waves, and if the stately variety
-in the movement of the sea had been taken as a key
-to a sympathetic movement of the dancer. We might
-then get a harmonious, alternating flow of the two
-movements, our eyes might play easily from one to
-the other, and the total pictorial effect might arouse
-the emotion of rhythm.</p>
-
-<p>In a similar way any of the movements of nature,
-such as the effect of wind on cloud, or tree, or field
-of grain; the fall or flow of water; the flight of bird
-or characteristic movement of beast, movements which,
-once admitted to the scene, cannot easily be controlled,
-might be taken as keys in which to play those movements
-which can be controlled.</p>
-
-<p>Some practical-minded person may suggest that
-instead of worrying about the composition of “unnecessary”
-motions, it would be better to omit them. But
-such a person overlooks the natural human desire for
-richness in art. We are so constituted that we crave
-lively emotional activity. We love rich variety, and
-at the same time we enjoy our ease. When we listen
-to the music of a pianist we are not satisfied if he
-plays with only one finger, even though he might thus
-play the melody correctly, because the melody alone
-is not rich enough. We want that melody against all
-its background of music. We want those musical
-sounds so beautifully related to each other that their<span class="pagenum" id="Page_122">122</span>
-harmony may arouse our feelings without unduly
-straining our attention.</p>
-
-<p>A splendid example of secondary motion may be
-seen in the light draperies of a dancer. Even in the
-elementary movement of a few leaps across the stage
-we see the delicate rhythm of a scarf which is at first
-retarded by the air, then follows the dancer gracefully,
-and at last gently overtakes her.</p>
-
-<p>Between the movements of body and scarf there
-is a charming play. They are pleasantly similar, yet
-they are pleasantly different. And there is a distinct
-feeling of progression in the various phases of this
-similarity and this difference. As spectators we catch
-this progression without any effort of the intellect
-and are instantly swept into its rhythm.</p>
-
-<p>It would be easy for the director, of course, if the
-story which he is about to film always called for action
-as graceful as that of a dance. But unfortunately his
-scenario often demands the connecting of actions
-which, pictorially considered, are totally unrelated to
-each other. Yet if the director cares to seek the principles
-of beauty he will find many ways of harmonizing
-elements that are seemingly in conflict.</p>
-
-<p>One way is simply to impose on each of the discordant
-elements a new value which they may assume in
-common without losing their own distinctive characters.
-Suppose, for instance, that we must show a
-society lady, with all her soft refinement, on a visit
-to a foundry, with all its sweating roughness. One
-may fear that there must be something repellent
-between her stately gentility and the bending backs
-of workmen; between her kid-gloved gestures and the
-flow of molten metal. Yet we can blend the whole<span class="pagenum" id="Page_123">123</span>
-scene into a single rhythm by suffusing all its elements
-with the warm glow of the furnace and by
-playing over them all the same movement of quivering
-light and shadow. This vibrant, welding beauty
-which lady and laborer and machine may have in common,
-while still retaining their individual dramatic
-significance, will thus give the touch of art to a motion
-picture which might otherwise be merely a crude
-photographic record of an incident in a story.</p>
-
-<p>Another way of bringing two conflicting motions
-into a rhythmical relation is to place between them a
-third motion which, by being somewhat like either of
-the other two, bridges the gap and thus transforms a
-sense of fixed opposition into a sense of moving variety.
-It would be somewhat of a shock, for instance,
-to shift our view instantly from the rippling flow of
-a narrow stream to the wheels and levers of a mill.
-But there would undoubtedly be a sense of continuity,
-and perhaps of rhythm, in shifting from a general
-view of the stream to a view of the water-wheel over
-which it flows, and thence to the wheels of the machinery
-inside the mill.</p>
-
-<p>This method of interposing a harmonizer might
-be useful also in carrying over the rhythm of motion
-into the rhythm of fixed forms. Thus if we were to
-throw upon the screen a picture of the gently rolling
-sea, sharply followed by a view of the sweeping horizon
-of the hills, it is most probable that the two kinds
-of rhythm would not unite to draw a single emotional
-response from the spectator. He would feel only the
-contrast. But if the view of the sea were followed
-by a view of a field of grain, whose wind-driven billows
-resembled the waves of the sea and whose rolling<span class="pagenum" id="Page_124">124</span>
-ground resembled the sweep of the hills, then the
-rhythm of the quiet hills themselves might easily
-seem to be one with the rhythm of the restless sea.</p>
-
-<p>As we study the subject of visual rhythm we are
-led to compare it again and again with auditive rhythm,
-which is best exemplified in music. Thus it is easy
-to see how a given motion in a picture might be considered
-the melody while all the other motions serve
-as accompaniment, and how characteristic motions
-might be played against each other like counterpoint
-in music. It is easy to see how a whole succession
-of scenes might be considered a single rhythmical
-totality, like a “movement” in a musical composition.
-And it is certain that any director who thought of
-cinema composition in that sense would never permit
-the slovenly joining which is so familiar in photoplays.
-He would not then allow the shift from one scene
-to another to be essentially a clash of unrelated
-motions. He would assure himself rather that the
-characteristic types of motion in one scene, their
-directions, velocities, and patterns, played into corresponding
-factors of the next scene, until the entire
-succession became a symphony of motion.<a id="FNanchor_4" href="#Footnote_4" class="fnanchor">D</a></p>
-
-<div class="footnote">
-
-<p><a id="Footnote_4" href="#FNanchor_4" class="fnanchor">D</a> For a further comparison between music and pictorial
-motions see Chapter IV of “The Art of Photoplay Making.”</p>
-
-</div>
-
-<p>It is an interesting fact that movement in a photoplay
-may come from other things besides motions.
-One would get a sense of movement, for example,
-even if every scene in a photoplay were itself a
-fixed picture held for a few seconds on the screen.
-The various durations of these pictures might be in
-a rhythmical series. The same might be said of their
-dominant tones, and of their characteristic patterns<span class="pagenum" id="Page_125">125</span>
-and textures. Would the time-lengths 3, 4, 2, 7, 5,
-be a good succession? Or would 3, 7, 4, 5, 2 be
-better? Which would make a better succession of
-figures? A circle, a triangle, and a cross? Or a
-cross, a square, and a circle? Questions like these
-are not trivial; neither are they over-refined. They
-and their answers should appear in the catechism of
-every cinema composer.</p>
-
-<p>Speaking of durations of scenes reminds us that
-in music it is often the silences between the notes
-which vary in length while the notes themselves are
-uniform. This would be true in the case of a simple
-melody played on the piano. The intervals between
-notes can be observed by tapping out the “time” of
-the piece on a single key of the piano, or on a tin
-pan, for that matter; and the rhythm of time thus
-represented would alone enable a listener to identify
-any popular piece of music.</p>
-
-<p>At present there are no rests on the screen, no
-blank periods between the scenes. There are, to be
-sure, moments of relaxation when scenes are being
-“faded out,” and these “fades,” like the dying away
-of musical sounds, have genuine rhythmical movement.
-But there is not on the screen any alternation
-between stimulus and non-stimulus, as there is in music,
-and as there is also in the performance of a stage play.
-The motion picture, therefore, lacks that source of
-rhythm which exists in musical rests or in the dramatic
-pauses of stage dialogue.</p>
-
-<p>Whether intervals of non-stimulus could be successfully
-introduced on the screen can be learned only
-by experiment. Any director who is really in earnest
-about developing the motion picture as art should<span class="pagenum" id="Page_126">126</span>
-make such an experiment. If he investigates the
-results of scientific tests in psychological laboratories
-he will learn that under certain conditions the normal
-spectator unconsciously creates rhythm in what he
-sees. It has been shown, for example, that a person
-looking at a small light which is flashed on and off at
-intervals has a tendency to make rhythmic groupings
-of those flashes, by overestimating or underestimating
-the lengths of the intervals. In other words, if you
-give the beholder’s imagination a chance to function,
-it will indulge in rhythmic play. We believe that if
-a cinema composer could thus produce rhythm by
-illusion, as well as by actual presentation, his achievement
-would be epoch-making in the movies.</p>
-
-<p>Movement, movement through rich variety, movement
-accomplished with the utmost ease—that is the
-essence of what we have chosen to call the play of
-pictorial motions. That play, as we have seen in the
-illustrations given, involves every kind of pictorial
-motion, whether of spot, or line, or pattern, or texture,
-or tone; and every property or phase, whether
-of direction, or rate, or duration; and every circumstance,
-whether in relation to other motions near or
-remote, simultaneous, or successive, or in relation to
-fixed elements of the picture. Any two or three of
-these things may be treated as a separate problem,
-but it is in the orchestration of all of them together
-that the director may achieve the dominant, distinctive
-rhythm of his photoplay. If he does not aspire to
-such achievement he is unworthy of his profession.
-If he evades his problems because they are difficult
-he is robbing his trust. If he declares that the world
-that loves movies does not crave beauty on the screen,<span class="pagenum" id="Page_127">127</span>
-he is bearing false witness. If he believes that the
-beauty of a photoplay lies wholly in the emotional
-appeal of the performer and in the dramatic action
-of the plot, he is stone blind to art.</p>
-
-<p>So far as the motions in a picture present the actions
-and reactions of the dramatic characters clearly and
-emphatically, they do faithful work; but this work
-becomes play when it is relieved of its hardness and
-dullness, and is animated with a spontaneity and variety
-that catches up the spectator into a swinging
-movement of attention. And those motions which
-are both work and play are basic in the beauty of
-cinematic art.</p>
-
-<hr />
-
-<div id="toclink_128" class="chapter">
-<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_128">128</span></p>
-
-<h2 class="nobreak" id="CHAPTER_IX">CHAPTER IX<br />
-
-<span class="subhead">PICTORIAL MOTIONS AT REST</span></h2>
-</div>
-
-<p class="in0"><span class="firstword">That</span> a moving thing may sometimes seem to be at
-rest is well known by any one who has ever spun a
-top. The top spins itself to sleep. We gaze upon it in
-a peculiar spell of restfulness, which is broken only
-when the top wakes up and begins to wabble.</p>
-
-<p>Now one trouble with the movies is that they often
-wabble when they ought to spin. The motions in the
-picture too often lack a center of balance, a point of
-rest. All of us have been annoyed by excessive
-motions, jumbling, clashing, on the screen. But many
-of us have also, in lucky moments, been delighted by
-sudden harmonies on the screen, when the pictorial
-motions, without slowing up in the least, were conjured
-into a strange vital repose. And afterward,
-when we recalled the enthrallment of such moments,
-we became optimists about the future of cinema art.</p>
-
-<p>Surely this is one of the characteristic appealing
-things about a motion picture, that it can show us
-motions doing the work of pictorial expression, indulging
-in rhythmic play, and yet suggesting a dynamic
-repose. Thus the youngest art can give us in a
-new way that “stimulation and repose” which, psychologists
-say, is the function of all arts. The painter
-who can suggest movement by means of fixed lines,
-masses, and colors is no more of a magician than the<span class="pagenum" id="Page_129">129</span>
-cinema composer who can make moving things suggest
-rest.</p>
-
-<p>Let me propose the following as working theories
-to explain the effect of reposefulness in organized pictorial
-motions: First, that the separate motions are
-balanced against each other; Second, that the significant
-motions are kept near to a center of rest within
-the frame of the picture, are sometimes even limited
-to an exceedingly small area of the screen; and, Third,
-that every significant motion is harmonized in kind,
-direction, and tempo with everything else in the
-picture.</p>
-
-<p>The balancing of pictorial motions does not imply
-that they must be paired off in exact equals. Certainly
-we do not insist that a dramatic scene be so
-composed that when, for example, a person rises from
-a chair in one part of a room, some other person sits
-down in a chair in the opposite part of the room. Such
-an effect would be highly mechanical, like the teetering
-of a see-saw; and it is not possible for a spectator
-to get a thrill of beauty while his attention is being
-held down to mechanics. We mean rather to apply
-the same reasoning to pictorial motions which we have
-in Chapter V applied to fixed lines, shapes, and tones.
-In short, we want to see the values of pictorial motions
-so well distributed over the screen, and so related to
-each other, that they give the impression of being in
-perfect equilibrium.</p>
-
-<p>Suppose we imagine a cinema scene which contains
-a waterfall in the left half, and nothing in the right
-half except a dark, uninteresting side of a cliff. That
-composition would be out of balance. And if a band
-of Indians entered the scene from the left and did a<span class="pagenum" id="Page_130">130</span>
-war dance directly in front of the waterfall, that
-would throw the composition still more out of balance.
-Or if, at the opening of the scene, the Indians appeared
-dancing in front of the bare cliff, and then gradually
-moved over to a place in front of the waterfall, this
-cluttering of motions would certainly unbalance the
-picture.</p>
-
-<p>Such cluttering is common on the screen because of
-the many movie directors who either are afraid of
-simplicity, or lack the skill which is necessary to make
-complexity appear simple. In the scene just mentioned
-the safest course would be to leave out the
-waterfall, however much of a natural wonder it may
-be, and to let the bare cliff serve as the entire background
-for the Indian dance. But if this cannot be
-done because of the peculiar demands of the plot,
-then the picture might be balanced by introducing
-some additional motion in the right half, say a column
-of smoke rising from a camp fire. Thus even the
-careful addition of a new element would tend to bring
-unity and restfulness into the arrangement of parts.
-Just visualize that composition, the whitish water falling
-on one side, and the light gray smoke rising on
-the other, and you will feel a peculiar restful balance
-which could never be obtained by a mechanical pairing
-of two waterfalls or two columns of smoke.</p>
-
-<p>As critics searching for beauty on the screen, we
-might even carry our demand for pictorial balance
-still farther. In some other picture we might demand
-that there be motions in the upper part of the composition
-to balance those in the lower part. To be
-sure, we would hardly look for such balance in a
-stage play, or in an ordinary cinema scene where the<span class="pagenum" id="Page_131">131</span>
-camera “shoots” in a level line, because in ordinary
-every-day life we see more motion near the bottom
-of our view than anywhere in the upper levels. Besides
-it is natural that weights should be kept low; any
-object is more likely to be in equilibrium when its
-center of gravity is low. But when we are shown a
-motion picture which has been made with the camera
-pointing downward, so that a level thing, like a plain
-or the surface of the sea, appears standing on end,
-then we like to see the points of interest so distributed
-that the various parts of the screen seem to be proportionally
-filled. Thus in a motion picture of a lake
-taken from a high cliff we are not pleased to see moving
-objects, boats, swans, etc., only in that area of the
-picture which comes near the lower edge of the frame.
-We realize instantly that the objects are not actually
-above or below each other in the air. And we forget,
-therefore, that the screen is really in a vertical plane
-and think of it rather as we would of a map lying
-before us. In fact, if there are swans in the near part
-of the lake view, then the distant surface of the lake
-will not appear to sink back into its proper level unless
-it bears some balancing weight and value, say, two or
-three small boats under sail.</p>
-
-<p>However, even the best of balancing in a separate
-scene cannot insure a balance between that scene and
-the next one. Directors are often tempted to make shots
-from odd angles, straight up or straight down, and
-to scatter them through a film, showing, for example,
-a skyscraper lying down, or a city street standing on
-end. But the resulting series of scenes does not make
-a composition pleasing to the eye. It gives the effect
-of wabbling. Even if these oblique views show no<span class="pagenum" id="Page_132">132</span>
-moving things whatsoever, their combined effect is
-the opposite of restfulness.</p>
-
-<p>Returning now to the subject of balance in separate
-scenes, we may consider depth, the third dimension
-of a cinema subject. This dimension is usually far
-greater than either the height or the breadth of that
-space which the camera measures off for us. And
-it is interesting to see what problems the cinema composer
-has in relating motions in the third dimension
-to those in the other dimensions of the picture. He
-often finds it hard, for instance, to compensate in the
-background for the movements in the foreground,
-without destroying the dramatic emphasis. The usual
-trouble in the movies is that, when the dramatic interest
-is in the foreground, the motions in the background
-nevertheless draw so much of our attention
-to that region that the picture becomes too heavy in
-the rear; while, on the other hand, if the dramatic
-interest is in the background, the motions in the foreground
-nevertheless become so heavy that the front
-of the picture falls into our faces.</p>
-
-<p>These are common faults; yet they may be avoided
-by foresight and ingenuity. In the “Four Horsemen
-of the Apocalypse,” Rex Ingram reveals a sure sense
-of proportion in his control of the marching soldiers.
-If you turn to the “still” of a village scene from this
-photoplay, facing <a href="#Page_133">page 133</a>, you will get a suggestion
-of the equilibrium which is obtained for a time, at
-least, between the motions in various regions of the
-picture.</p>
-
-<div id="if_i_133" class="figcenter" style="max-width: 34em;">
- <img src="images/i_133.jpg" width="2151" height="1657" alt="" />
- <div class="caption">From <i>The Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse</i>. The arrangement in this scene has
-interesting balance between the right and left halves of the picture, as well as between
-the foreground and the background, and there is a vigorous rhythm in the moving
-columns of soldiers. See <a href="#Page_120">pages 120</a> and <a href="#Page_132">132</a>.</div></div>
-
-<p>Let us say that the foreground of that scene extends
-from the camera to the cavalryman, that the middle
-ground is that area which is occupied by the buildings,<span class="pagenum" id="Page_133">133</span>
-and that the background is all the region which
-lies beyond the ruined tower. This picture has many
-distances, and yet they fuse together into a single
-composition. Equilibrium is maintained by the fact
-that the scattering figures near the fountain weigh
-against the marching soldiers to the left in the foreground,
-while the two sides find a center of balance
-in the quiet horseman and the three persons to whom
-he is talking. In the middle ground the same care
-has been shown, for the soldiers first swing to their
-left, past the tower, and then execute a balancing
-movement to their right. In the background there is
-a balance between those forces which are executing a
-“column right” and those which are proceeding down
-into the village street. And if we take the background
-of the picture as against the foreground, we shall
-find a balancing point in the narrowest part of the
-street. No undue attention is attracted to either side
-of this point, but the whole sweep of interest from
-front to back, or from back to front, is continuous and
-even. There is plenty of military movement here amid
-evidences of terrific bombardment, and yet, because
-of the artistic composition of the picture, we get from
-it all a momentary sense of repose, as though war
-itself were at rest.</p>
-
-<p>Several details in this “still” are worth noting. For
-example, the comparatively few figures in the right
-side of the foreground are given additional weight by
-the whiteness of costume, as against the gray of the
-soldiers. Another interesting thing is the balance
-between the line described by the leading company of
-soldiers and the line of tree tops on the wooded hill,
-which begins near the upper right hand corner and<span class="pagenum" id="Page_134">134</span>
-extends to the castle. This relation can be clearly
-seen by holding the “still” upside down.</p>
-
-<p>The reader must keep in mind, of course, that in a
-“still” the arrested motion has not the same weight
-as the actual motion on the screen, and consequently
-the fixed things get more than their share of weight.
-Therefore in this “still” from “The Four Horsemen”
-the jagged holes in the buildings attract more attention
-than they do on the screen, where the movement of the
-soldiers and civilians brings the whole composition
-into balance.</p>
-
-<p>When the whole picture is deep, as in the example
-just discussed, it offends us if some of the moving
-objects come near the camera, because this produces
-two pictures within a single frame, namely, a close-up
-and a long shot. The effect is as bad as that of listening
-to an orchestra so placed that some of the instruments
-are five feet away from our ears while the others
-are seventy-five feet away. In either case there comes
-a sense of violence instead of restfulness. The close-up
-superposed on the long shot is a common fault in
-photoplays. But we are often annoyed by the opposite
-fault also, that of jumbling two sets of actions which
-are going on in adjoining areas, one just beyond the
-other. In such a case the director should contrive to
-make the vertical planes seem farther apart than they
-really are; and it can easily be done without cleaving
-the picture in two.</p>
-
-<p>To prove this let us imagine a cabaret scene containing
-prominent persons of the play sitting at tables
-near the camera, and a number of couples dancing on
-a floor farther away. In such an arrangement it is
-probable that the diners have more dramatic value<span class="pagenum" id="Page_135">135</span>
-than the dancers; yet the dancing figures are likely to
-distract attention from those seated at the tables, and
-thus throw the picture out of balance. Mr. Ingram in
-“The Four Horsemen” had this very problem, and he
-solved it in a very simple and convincing way. He
-allowed a thick haze of cigarette smoke to envelop
-the dancers till they seemed dim and distant. Or,
-rather, he used the smoke as a transparent curtain
-which separates the diners from the action in the
-background. Thus balance was restored and the spectator
-could follow the action in the foreground without
-a sense of disturbance.</p>
-
-<p>A separation of planes somewhat similar to this was
-skilfully effected by Allan Dwan in “Sahara.” One
-of the settings is a luxurious tent in the desert. The
-front of this tent had a wide opening over which hung
-a veil of mosquito netting. Viewed from within the
-tent, this veil became a soft background against which
-the figures moved, while at the same time it served as
-a thick atmosphere to give dimness and distance to the
-figures which were just outside the tent. By this
-device, which is as natural and unobtrusive as the
-smoke screen described above, Mr. Dwan, besides providing
-a peculiar pictorial quality of gradated tones,
-kept two sets of figures separate and yet combined
-them in rich restfulness.</p>
-
-<p>When a director is composing a scene in which there
-is a single moving element with a very short path of
-motion and no strong fixed interests to counter-balance
-it, he should remember that an object tends to
-shift the weight of interest somewhat in advance of
-its own movement. Therefore, a picture will seem to
-be in better balance if a movement begins near one<span class="pagenum" id="Page_136">136</span>
-edge and ends near the center, than if it begins at the
-center of the picture and passes out at one side.</p>
-
-<p>This observation regarding the shifting of balance
-during pictorial action raises the question whether it
-is a practical possibility to keep the composition of a
-cinema scene steadily in equilibrium for minute after
-minute. Since the fixed accents do not change their
-positions and the moving accents do, one might suppose
-that the scene must sooner or later fall out of
-balance. But this is not necessarily so. It is true that
-if, for example, there is a group of fixed accents in
-the left half of the picture, and a single figure starts
-from the center and passes out of the scene at the
-right, it would tend, first, to over-balance the right
-side of the picture, and then suddenly to leave it without
-weight. But this tendency may be counter-acted
-by swinging the camera slightly to the left without
-stopping the exposure. Such an expedient would shift
-all of the fixed accents together, though at the cost of
-introducing a momentary false motion. The ingenious
-director may find other means by which to compensate
-for the changes which must of necessity come
-about in a cinematic composition. However, when it
-is not possible to have good proportion and balance
-at more than one moment of a changing scene, that
-moment should be at the pictorial climax, the crucial
-point of that scene, the instant when the spectator is
-to receive the strongest impression, the greatest stimulation
-and yet the most perfect repose.</p>
-
-<p>Equilibrium is reposeful because it is characteristic
-of a thing at rest. To say that another characteristic
-of a thing at rest is that it stays where it is, may sound
-like an Irish bull; but we say it, nevertheless, in order<span class="pagenum" id="Page_137">137</span>
-to make another point in our argument that pictorial
-motions may sometimes be in dynamic repose. It is
-quite possible for a pictorial motion to give a sharp
-impression of power, weight, and velocity, and yet
-stay practically where it first appears on the screen.
-An express train, for example, may be shown in a
-“long shot” starting several hundred yards away from
-the camera and continuing for miles into the distance,
-and yet the actual moving image on the screen might
-cover an area less than two feet square, and might,
-from beginning to end of the scene, never come near
-the frame of the picture. Thus the train, without
-losing any of its impressive character, would provide
-a reposeful motion for the eye to gaze upon. Surely
-such an effect would be better than to show the train
-as a close-up on a track at right angles to our line of
-sight, with the locomotive crashing in through the
-frame at the left of the picture and crashing out
-through the frame at the right.</p>
-
-<p>The reposeful quality of restricted movement on
-the screen is due partly to the fact that the flicker and
-the eye movement is thus reduced, as we have said in
-Chapter III. In the case just described it is due also
-to the contrast between the slight movement which we
-actually <em>look at</em> and the large movement which we
-really <em>perceive and feel</em>. We look at inches and perceive
-miles. Thus we see very much with extreme
-ease.</p>
-
-<p>We have remarked in preceding chapters that every
-picture has four lines, those of the frame, which the
-composer must always consider. He could, it is true,
-soften the sharp boundaries of the picture by using
-some masking device with the camera, but this is not<span class="pagenum" id="Page_138">138</span>
-usually done. The four corners of the frame are
-always strongly emphasized, because of the crossing of
-lines at right angles. To lead another strong line into
-one of the corners would surely result in undue emphasis
-and lack of balance, because of the power of
-converging lines. It is almost as bad to lead a strong
-line squarely into the frame between the corners,
-because such a meeting creates two more right angles
-to attract attention. Of course, there may be certain
-lines in a composition, such as the line of the horizon,
-which cannot stop short of the frame. In such a case
-it is well to have some other strong accent not far
-from the center of the picture in order to keep the
-attention of the beholder within the frame.</p>
-
-<p>What is true of the relation between fixed lines is
-also true of the relation between paths of motion and
-fixed lines. It is rather annoying to watch a continuous
-movement continually being cut off by the frame;
-and it is especially annoying when one sees that such
-a composition might have been avoided. In a waterfall,
-for example, the points of greatest interest are the
-curving top and the foaming bottom, and we like to
-see both at the same time and wholly within the frame.
-A motion shown entirely surrounded by things at rest
-is reposeful on the screen as well as in nature. Like
-a fixed object it stays where it is.</p>
-
-<p>There are certain pictorial motions, however, such
-as the falling of snow, which must always either begin
-or continue outside of the frame. But even when
-we view such a motion on the screen or in nature we
-get a feeling of repose, because our eyes do not perform
-any following movement; we do not, in watching
-a snow storm through a window, pick out certain<span class="pagenum" id="Page_139">139</span>
-flakes and follow them from a height until they
-strike the ground; but rather we keep our line of sight
-steady upon a certain spot while the changing texture
-slips by. One can get the same effect by looking down
-from a tall building into a crowded street. The individuals
-are no longer thought of as separate moving
-objects, because they weave themselves into a broad
-band of moving and changing texture. Here we get
-the feeling of restfulness, of motion in repose, in contrast
-to the feeling of restless motion when we ourselves
-become part of that crowd.</p>
-
-<p>A delightful picture in “Barbary Sheep,” directed
-by Maurice Tourneur, is the view of a flock of sheep
-moving slowly along from left to right. The animals
-are so crowded together that the mass as a whole has
-a textural quality. And yet it is not fixed texture, like
-that of cloth, because some of the sheep move faster
-and then again more slowly than the others, and thus,
-as in the case of the snow flakes, or the crowd in the
-street, give us a vital stimulus of change within the
-texture itself.</p>
-
-<p>A somewhat similar sense of rest comes from watching
-those motions which arise and vanish within some
-given area of the screen. A cloud of cigarette smoke
-which floats and coils for a few moments and then
-fades into nothing, bubbles which rise in a pool and
-break into faint ripples that finally die on the glassy
-surface, the blazing and dimming of tones through
-the photographic device of the “fade-out” and the
-“fade-in”—all changes of this type we sense vividly
-as movements, and yet as movements in delightful
-repose.</p>
-
-<p>At the beginning of this chapter we mentioned the<span class="pagenum" id="Page_140">140</span>
-spinning top as an example of motion that had the
-appearance of being at rest. To a certain extent all
-circular movement presents that appearance and may
-be very pleasing on the screen, providing it does not
-conflict with our desire for fitness and is not allowed
-to become monotonous. A fly wheel whirling may
-look like a disk at rest, but it is monotonous and
-entirely without artistic stimulation. The action
-within the ring of a circus presents a more stimulating
-show, and yet it is not quite satisfying as an
-artistic composition of motion, because we cannot help
-feeling that it is not natural, that it is unfit for a
-horse to turn forever within a forty-foot ring. In
-the æsthetic dance, on the other hand, a circling movement
-can always be of satisfying beauty, full of graceful
-vitality and yet delightfully reposeful, too, because
-it never flies away from its axis fixed within our area
-of vision.</p>
-
-<p>Now, we cannot recommend that the players of a
-film story should always be shown running around in
-circles. And yet their separate actions, gestures and
-bodily movements in general, may often be so composed
-that they progress in a circular path, each movement
-tracing an arc of a circle which nowhere touches
-the frame of the picture. Such circularity of motions
-would give unity, balance, and repose. A good example
-of circularity may be seen in “The Covered Wagon”
-when the wagon train, just before coming to a halt,
-divides and swings into two large arcs of a circle,
-which slowly contract as the wagons turn inward
-toward a common center.</p>
-
-<p>Another interesting example of circular balance
-may be seen in “One Arabian Night,” a German photoplay<span class="pagenum" id="Page_141">141</span>
-directed by Ernst Lubitsch. The scene is a
-court yard, viewed from on high. Looking down we
-see eight or ten servants running inward from all
-sides to a focal place, where they pile up cushions
-for the hero and heroine. Then they turn and run
-outwards to get more cushions. In a few moments
-they return, and finally they seat themselves in a circle
-about the central figures. Here is a charming combination
-of pictorial motion with a natural dramatic
-by-play, delighting the eye and lingering long as a
-pleasant motor image in memory. When we analyze
-this part of the picture we discover that the principle
-of balancing motions has been applied perfectly. To
-begin with, the design is kept in balance because the
-men enter at the same time from opposite directions
-and approach the center at equal speed. Thus, while
-they are separate figures moving over symmetrically
-arranged courses, they also form a circle which gradually
-contracts about a fixed center. This inward movement
-of the men is itself balanced by the corresponding
-outward movement when they go to get more
-cushions, which is in turn balanced when they come
-back. Finally this pattern of a circle contracting,
-expanding, and contracting again, harmonizes perfectly
-with the fixed circle which is formed when the
-men seat themselves. There is a further pleasing continuity
-in the composition when a woman enters the
-scene and dances over a circular path just within the
-ring formed by the servants.</p>
-
-<p>To the so-called practical business man, whose artistic
-experience consists chiefly in drawing dollar signs,
-it may sound like sheer folly for us spectators to ask
-a director to spend valuable time in refining the art<span class="pagenum" id="Page_142">142</span>
-of pictorial motions by some of the methods above
-suggested. The money magnate may not realize that
-even a slight improvement, a delicate touch, may be
-as important in a picture as in the motor of his touring
-car. Yet he does know, of course, that in the
-world of industry the superiority of one article over
-another may lie in a secret known only to the maker,
-a secret perhaps never even suspected by the man who
-sells the article. We should be sorry indeed to lose
-credit with the man who can draw dollar signs, because
-we need his co-operation, and we hope, therefore, that
-he will not long remain blind to the fact that in art
-the superiority of one article over another may lie in
-a concealed design so skilfully wrought that neither
-the spectator nor the man who traffics in the spectator’s
-pleasure may suspect its presence.</p>
-
-<p>Balanced motions and motions that are limited in
-area are valuable on the screen, we have said, because
-they can stimulate the spectator while giving him the
-satisfaction of repose. We come now to a third characteristic
-of motions that appear to be at rest, the
-fact that they are in perfect adjustment with everything
-else around them. Perfect adjustment means that
-all of the moving elements of a pictorial composition
-are at peace with the fixed elements, as well as with
-each other. It means harmony, the supreme quality
-of every art.</p>
-
-<p>No other art, not even music, contains so great a
-number of varied parts as the motion picture. To fuse
-all of these parts into a single harmonious whole
-requires knowledge and skill and happy inspiration,
-yet fusion must take place in the cinema composition
-itself in order that the spectator may be spared the<span class="pagenum" id="Page_143">143</span>
-annoyance of trying to unify in his own mind the ill-adjusted
-factors on the screen.</p>
-
-<p>The pleasing effect of motions in harmony can be
-illustrated by something with which we are all familiar
-from childhood, the display of sky rockets. The
-spray of stars, flaming up, burning bright lines in the
-sky, and fading out again into the darkness of night,
-exhibits a perfect harmony of kinds, directions, and
-rates of motions, as well as of changes in brightness.
-We have explained in Chapter III that things moving
-in similar directions are more pleasing than those
-crossing in opposite directions because they are easier
-for the eye to follow. And it is, of course, true that
-whatever hurts the eyes will probably not seem beautiful.
-But a picture must please our emotions as well
-as our eyes. We must feel that it is good, that it is
-in order, that it obeys some law of harmony. In the
-case of the sky rocket we do feel that there is unity
-and not discord, rest and not warfare. Though we
-may not stop to analyze the matter, we feel that at
-any one moment all of the burning elements are in
-perfect agreement, obeying the same law of motion.</p>
-
-<p>Now let us recall some familiar movie subjects,
-and test them for harmony. A common picture is
-that of a horse and an automobile racing side by side.
-Here there is similarity of direction, but there is no
-similarity of motion. The car glides; the horse
-bounds. The changing pattern which the horse describes
-with legs and neck and back and tail finds no
-parallel in the moving panel of the car. Besides, we
-feel that there is antagonism between the two. They
-hate each other. Their histories and destinies are different.
-They are not in harmony. A much better<span class="pagenum" id="Page_144">144</span>
-subject is a huntsman galloping over the countryside
-with a dog at the horse’s heels. Every action of the
-one animal is somewhat like every corresponding action
-of the other animal. One might even say that the
-horse is a large kind of dog, while the dog is a small
-kind of horse. And, as they cross the fields in loyalty
-to the same master, their motions harmonize.</p>
-
-<p>There would be unity of a similar kind in a picture
-of an automobile and a railroad train racing on parallel
-roads. Although they are two separate machines,
-their motions fuse into one thing, which we call a
-race. If the roads are not perfectly parallel but swing
-slowly away from and toward each other again, we
-get a pleasing rhythm of motions, yet, because the
-directions and speeds are similar, the unity still
-remains.</p>
-
-<p>But if we imagine the train dashing by a farmstead
-where a Dutch windmill sweeps its large arms slowly
-around, we would feel again a lack of unity between
-the two kinds of motions. The impression upon our
-minds would be confused; it would not be a single
-impression, because the moving objects show two
-different kinds of patterns, with rates of speed that
-are not sufficiently alike to be grasped as a unity. A
-better picture would be that of an old Dutch mill on
-the bank of a river whose sluggish waters flow wearily
-by. Perhaps even an old steamboat with a large paddle
-wheel might be so introduced that the revolutions
-and patterns of the two wheels would be similar, while
-the forward thrusts of the boat and the current would
-also be similar, all four movements blending together
-into a single harmony, like the music of four different
-instruments in an orchestra.</p>
-
-<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_145">145</span></p>
-
-<p>The orchestration of motions is, in fact, the proper
-work of the cinema composer. If he cannot control
-the objects which move before him, he is in as bad a
-way as the director of an orchestra who cannot make
-the musicians do his bidding. We can sympathize
-with the movie director, because some of the things
-he wants to bring into a picture are not so easily
-controlled as musicians. One can talk to a fiddler,
-but one cannot waste time talking to a brook or to a
-Dutch windmill. However, if a windmill will not
-behave itself, it can be dismissed no less promptly
-than a fiddler.</p>
-
-<p>The average photoplay seen in the theaters to-day
-could undoubtedly be improved by retaking it with at
-least half of the material omitted from every scene.
-The simplicity thus obtained would help to give a more
-unified effect, would be less of a strain on the eyes,
-and would require less effort of the mind. But simplicity
-is worshiped by only a few of our best directors.
-The average director who is asked to film a
-scene of a country girl in a barnyard, a scene in which
-simplicity itself should predominate, will produce a
-conglomeration of chickens fluttering, ducks waddling,
-calves frisking, a dog trotting back and forth, wagging
-his tail and snapping his jaws, gooseberry bushes shaking
-in the wind (always the wind), a brook rippling
-over pebbles, and, somewhere in the center of the
-excitement, the girl herself, scattering corn from her
-basket while her skirts flap fiercely about her knees.
-From such a picture the spectator goes out into the
-comparative quiet of crowded Broadway with a sigh
-of relief, thankful that he does not have to live amid
-the nerve-wracking scenes of a farm.</p>
-
-<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_146">146</span></p>
-
-<p>When we insist that the motions in a picture should
-be in harmony with each other because of the pictorial
-restfulness which thus results, we do not forget that
-motions should also be in harmony with the meaning,
-the dramatic action, which the scene contains. Some
-red-blooded reader of this book might possibly have
-the notion that artistic composition of a picture will
-rob it of its strength. Please may we ask such a person
-to read carefully Chapters II, IV, and VII of this
-book? We have maintained there that good pictorial
-composition can make any movie “punch” harder than
-ever. Let us illustrate that argument again. Suppose
-we “shoot” two brawny men in a fist fight. The
-motions of the men should have unity, even though
-their souls might lack it. It sounds like a contradiction,
-but the methods of the men fighting should harmonize
-in motion. If they do not, we cannot enjoy
-the fight. What would you think of a fist fight in
-which one man had the motions of a windmill, and
-the other had the motions of a chicken?</p>
-
-<p>Many movie directors have had stage experience,
-either as actors or directors, and are instinctively able
-to harmonize the dramatic pantomime of actors or
-actresses, whenever this pantomime takes place in the
-midst of perfectly quiet surroundings, as is usual in
-the setting of the theater stage. But as soon as these
-directors take their troupe out “on location” they
-encounter difficulties, because the wind nearly always
-blows costumes, bushes and trees into motion, because
-there are nearly always animals or moving vehicles
-on the scene, and because the “location” is more likely
-than not to include such things as fountains, waterfalls,
-or sea beaches. They find therefore, that the<span class="pagenum" id="Page_147">147</span>
-movement of the actors during any one moment of
-the picture is likely to be discounted by the gamboling
-of a lamb or the breaking of a sea wave during the
-next minute.</p>
-
-<p>The sea and surf possess a perfectly rhythmical
-motion which one may watch for hours without becoming
-weary. And the effect of that motion may well be
-heightened by composing it with other moving objects
-so that the various motions taken together will harmonize
-in directions, shapes, and velocities. Such
-composition was very well done in the climactic scenes
-of “The Love Light,” the Mary Pickford play directed
-by Frances Marion, who also wrote the story. Views
-of the sea breaking on the shore are shown time and
-again throughout the play, but the most impressive
-scenes are near the end where a sailing party lose control
-of their sloop in a storm and are shipwrecked on
-the shoals. Here the principal moving objects partake
-of the movements of the sea and therefore harmonize
-with it in tempo. The vessel rises and falls
-with the waves. The people above and below decks
-sway and lurch with the same motion. The water
-which breaks through the hatches and trickles down
-the companionway describes the same shapes and flows
-with the same rate as the water which breaks over
-and trickles down the rocks. The total effect is a
-single impression of motion in which the separate
-parts parallel and reinforce each other. And this total
-impression is sustained through many scenes, even
-though the position of the camera is often shifted and
-the subject is viewed from many angles. This cinematic
-climax is a good example for readers to keep
-in mind when they set out through the movie theaters<span class="pagenum" id="Page_148">148</span>
-in search of cases where the motion of nature has
-been successfully harmonized with those of other
-motions demanded by the action of the story.</p>
-
-<p>One of the ugliest of pictorial conflicts occurs when
-false motion and real motion are projected together
-upon the screen. Who has not been annoyed by the
-typical “follow” picture in which a lady is shown
-ascending a flight of stairs, while the stairs themselves
-(because the camera has been swept upward during
-the exposure) flow swiftly downward across the
-screen? The “follow” or “panoram” picture of moving
-things is usually bad because it falsifies real motion
-and gives the appearance of ugly motion to things
-which actually are at rest. An atrocious picture of a
-horse race, exhibited not very long ago, had been
-taken by carrying the camera on a motor car which
-had been kept abreast though not steadily abreast, of
-the horses. The result was that the grand stand,
-guard rails, and all fixed objects flew crazily from
-left to right, and that, because of the irregular swinging
-of the camera, the horses sometimes seemed to
-drop back together, even though they had clearly not
-slackened their speed.</p>
-
-<p>We have been discussing in the above paragraphs
-the harmony of pictorial motions which occur together
-at a given moment. They may have a harmony like
-that of musical notes struck in a chord. But pictorial
-motions come in a procession as well as abreast, and
-these successive motions may have a harmony like
-that which runs through a melody in music.</p>
-
-<p>In a stage play it is not difficult to organize simultaneous
-or successive actions so that the total action
-will produce a single effect, because all the movements<span class="pagenum" id="Page_149">149</span>
-of human performers are naturally very much of the
-same style. The gestures and postures of a performer
-in any given action are very likely to be followed by
-similar gestures and postures at frequent intervals
-during the play. Stage directors have developed their
-traditions of unity and harmony through centuries of
-theatrical history. They have learned to preserve,
-not only the “key” of the action, but the “tempo” as
-well. If they strike a certain pace at the beginning
-of the act or play they will maintain that pace
-with practically no variation to the end.</p>
-
-<p>It would be most desirable if unity of motion could
-be sustained throughout the entire length of a photoplay,
-as in a stage play or in a musical composition.
-There should be a real continuity of pictures, as there
-is supposed to be “continuity” of actions described in
-a scenario. But such continuity is hard to find on
-the screen. In “The Love Light,” for instance, the
-film which we have just discussed, there is little unity
-of motion except in the climactic scenes. The very
-action from which the title “The Love Light” is
-derived, is botched in composition. The light is that
-of a lighthouse and the heroine manipulates it so as
-to throw a signal to her lover. This action is shown
-in a series of cut-backs from a close-up of a girl in
-the lighthouse to a general view of the sea below and
-to a close-up of the hero. But the lantern with its
-apparatus of prisms makes a cylindrical pattern which
-does not harmonize in shape with the long white
-pencil of the searchlight sweeping the sea. Nor does
-it harmonize in motion, for the simple reason that the
-sweeping ray moves clock-wise, in spite of the fact
-that the girl rotates the lantern counter-clock-wise.</p>
-
-<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_150">150</span></p>
-
-<p>Two other discrepancies in these scenes may be
-noted. One is that in the close-ups the lantern does
-not appear to be lighted, and the other is that lighthouses
-do not, as a rule, send out light in pencil-like
-shape.</p>
-
-<p>The scene above cited lacks pictorial unity, in spite
-of the fact that the neighboring scenes are in perfect
-unity of dramatic meaning. This illustrates the dangerous
-difference between saying things in words and
-saying them in pictures. If we write, for example,
-“she swings the lantern around slowly, etc.,” no reader
-is likely to question whether the lantern is lighted or
-not, or whether it is rotated in one direction or the
-opposite. But the camera impolitely tells the whole
-truth. And some truths are full of fight when they
-are brought face to face with each other.</p>
-
-<p>The suddenness with which one scene leaps to the
-next on the screen is a factor which many directors
-and most scenario writers fail to reckon with. In
-Chapter III we have discussed at some length the
-effect which these sudden jumps have upon our eyes.
-It remains now to see how the “flash” from one scene
-to another affects our minds. In “Barbary Sheep,”
-directed by Maurice Tourneur, there is bad joining
-which may be illustrated by naming a succession of
-three scenes. They are: (1) A picture of a mountain
-sheep some distance away on the edge of a cliff, sharp
-against the sky, an excellent target for a hunter. (2)
-The hero out hunting. He sees something, aims his
-gun obliquely upward. Our eyes follow the line of
-the gun toward the upper left-hand corner of the
-frame. (3) Some society ladies in a room.</p>
-
-<p>Perhaps the reader can guess, even from this incomplete<span class="pagenum" id="Page_151">151</span>
-description in words, how sudden and complete
-was the shock of scene 3 coming after the preparation
-of scene 2. There was a complete violation of unity
-of meanings, as well as of motions. We cannot say
-who was to blame for this bad art, whether it was the
-director, or some one in the “cutting room.” Possibly
-some motion picture operator had mutilated the film
-in the theater. The fact remains that this part of the
-picture as it reached the audience was badly composed.
-The promise of one scene was not only ignored but
-ridiculed in the next scene.</p>
-
-<p>An excellent illustration of how the promise made
-by a scene can be beautifully fulfilled for the eye by
-a following scene may be found in Griffith’s “The Idol
-Dancer.” Incidentally the joining shows how false
-motion may be harmonized with real motion. Let the
-reader imagine himself looking at a motion picture
-screen. The setting is a New England country road
-in winter. Into the picture from the lower right side
-of the frame comes a one-horse sleigh, which, as it
-glides along the road, describes a curving motion over
-the screen, first to the left and then upward to the
-right. It then begins curving to the left again, when
-the scene is suddenly cut. The effect on our eyes at
-this moment is such that we expect a continuation of
-motion toward the left, a completion of the swing.
-And this is just what we get in the next picture, which
-shows, not the sleigh at all, but the motion of the
-landscape gliding by, from right to left, as the sleigh-riders
-themselves might have seen it. We feel a
-pleasure of the eye somewhat akin to the pleasure of
-our ears when a musician strikes a note which the
-melody has led us to expect. Griffith’s touch of art in<span class="pagenum" id="Page_152">152</span>
-this joining is especially delightful because it is so
-subtle that any spectator, though he would surely feel
-it, would not observe it unless he were especially
-occupied in the analysis of motion on the screen.</p>
-
-<p>Sometimes two scenes may be joined in perfect harmony
-of motions and yet show a conflict of meanings.
-In “The Love Light,” above mentioned, we have one
-scene where the hero is about to take refuge in the
-cellar beneath the room occupied by the heroine. He
-raises a trap door, goes down the steps, and, as he
-descends slowly, closes the door behind him. This
-downward-swinging motion of the door is in our eyes
-when the scene is cut, and the next instant we see the
-outer door of the house swinging open suddenly as
-the heroine rushes out into the yard. The motions of
-the two doors are in perfect unity and balance, but
-we are shocked nevertheless, because, since our minds
-and eyes were on the hero in the cellar, we had expected
-another view of him beneath the trap door.</p>
-
-<p>But there are worse compositions than this in the
-movie theaters. Sometimes whole plays are out of
-unity from beginning to end. A notorious example
-was a photoplay called “The Birth of a Race,” which
-began with Adam and Eve and ended up with visions
-of the future, touching as it ran such things as little
-Moses and the Daughter of Pharaoh, the slave drivers
-of Egypt, the exodus of Israel, the crucifixion of
-Christ, the three ships of Columbus, the signing of the
-Declaration of Independence, Lincoln and the Emancipation
-Proclamation, the World War, German spies,
-steel works in the United States, a strike of the
-workers, etc., etc. All of these scenes were badly
-joined, but the greatest shock of all came when the<span class="pagenum" id="Page_153">153</span>
-action jumped in a flash from Christ and the two
-thieves writhing in crucifixion to the three ships of
-Columbus heeling gracefully in a light breeze.</p>
-
-<p>Merely to hint at the contents of such a play is, we
-hope, sufficient criticism. Without harmony of subject
-matter there certainly can be no harmony of treatment.
-And if the director of “The Birth of a Race”
-offers as his defense that he did not write the story,
-we can only retort that he should not have picturized
-it. Even when the subject matter is in continuous
-unity it requires a skillful, painstaking, sincere director
-to weave its various materials into a single harmony
-of impressiveness.</p>
-
-<p>Perhaps we have continued long enough the discussion
-of the many-sided nature and the artistic value
-of pictorial motions at rest. Let us simply add that
-the kind of rest we have in mind is never the rest
-of inaction, of sleep, or of death; it is rather a dynamic
-repose. Just as the still portions of the motion picture
-may be active upon the spectator’s mind, so the motions
-may be reposeful while they are both at work
-and at play. Such harmony of pictorial motions on
-the screen is not too high an ideal for the lovers of
-the cinema. The glimpses we get of that ideal now
-are enough to assure us that as time goes on more
-and more directors will be filled with inspiration and
-will achieve triumphant expression through their
-chosen art.</p>
-
-<hr />
-
-<div id="toclink_154" class="chapter">
-<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_154">154</span></p>
-
-<h2 class="nobreak" id="CHAPTER_X">CHAPTER X<br />
-
-<span class="subhead">MASTERY IN THE MOVIES</span></h2>
-</div>
-
-<p class="in0"><span class="firstword">Who</span> is the legitimate master in movie making? It is,
-of course, the director, and he should take complete
-command over the plot action of the photoplay, over
-the players and their accessories, over the settings and
-those who make the settings, over the camera men,
-over the cutters, joiners, and title writers; in short,
-over all those who are co-workers in photoplay making.
-If this mastery cannot be obtained; if writers
-and players and scene painters will not agree to shed
-their royal purple for the badge of service; if all those
-who co-operate in making a photoplay cannot see that
-the product must be judged by its total effect and not
-by mere details of performance, then, of course we
-shall never have art upon the screen.</p>
-
-<p>But it is usually very difficult for the director to
-take and keep complete command. Among the first
-rebels against his authority is the writer of the story
-which is to be filmed. It would be best, of course, if
-the director could originate his own plot, as a painter
-conceives his idea for a painting, or if he could, at
-least, prepare his own scenario as studiously as the
-painter makes his own preliminary sketches for a
-painting. But, under the present system, these two
-tasks of movie making can only in exceptional cases
-be performed in detail by the same person. The next<span class="pagenum" id="Page_155">155</span>
-best thing, then, is for the writer to limit himself to
-the bare subject matter of a picture, that is, the general
-action in which the characters are involved, while
-the director takes the responsibility for the pictorial
-treatment of this subject matter.</p>
-
-<p>Now comes an interesting question. Which has the
-more artistic weight on the screen, the treatment of
-the subject, that is the presentation of the story
-pictorially, or the subject as such regardless of its
-presentation? The same question may be asked of any
-masterpiece of art; is it distinctive because of the subject
-matter or because of what the artist has done
-to that subject matter? In other words, would the
-subject matter remain distinctive even if it were badly
-treated?</p>
-
-<p>There are sometimes happenings in real life that
-can hold one’s unwavering attention, no matter how
-poorly presented in language or picture. For example,
-if a panic-stricken idiot were to rush to you and
-say, “It were quick, oh, explosion by Wall Street and
-lots of fellers shut up dead and J. P. Morgan’s windows
-all over bloody men every way,” you would be
-shocked—not amused—and you would not stop to
-consider the ridiculous language of the report. And
-if by some strange coincidence a camera man had
-secured a motion picture of that explosion in Wall
-Street, you would be curious to see that picture, and
-would undoubtedly be impressed by it, no matter how
-ineffective might be its photography or pictorial composition.</p>
-
-<p>In fiction there may be certain chains of incidents,
-such as the action of a detective story, which might
-carry a strong dramatic appeal, even though the language<span class="pagenum" id="Page_156">156</span>
-of the narrator were crude, confused, obscure,
-weak, and of no beauty appropriate to the thing expressed.
-“There may be,” we say; but all self-respecting
-writers will agree with us that language-proof
-stories are extremely rare. The story is usually impressive
-because of the telling, and not in spite of it.</p>
-
-<p>In the motion picture, naturally, the telling is not
-in words, but in arrangements of lines and shapes, of
-tones and textures, of lights and shadows, these values
-being either fixed or changing, and exhibited simultaneously
-or in succession. Whatever arrangement
-the director makes comes directly to us in the theater.
-Barring accident we see it unchanged on the screen,
-and, as far as we are concerned, it is the only treatment
-which the story has.</p>
-
-<p>It is true, of course, that cinematographic treatment
-may be vaguely suggested by written or spoken words;
-it may be more definitely suggested by drawings; but
-it can never actually be given either by words or drawings.
-Even the director himself cannot know definitely,
-in advance of the actual rehearsing and taking
-of the picture, just what the composition will be. He
-may plan in advance, but he does not actually compose
-until the players are on the scene and the camera
-“grinding.” During those moments are created the
-actual designs which become fixed permanently in the
-film.</p>
-
-<p>Turning from pictures for a moment, let us consider
-the relation between plot and treatment in literary
-art. It is interesting to study Shakespeare’s
-attitude toward the material which he borrowed for
-his plays. Glance through the introduction and notes
-of any school text, and you will see that the plot which<span class="pagenum" id="Page_157">157</span>
-came to his hand ready-made was not held sacred.
-He twisted it, tore out pieces from it, or spun it together
-with other plots similarly altered. And even
-then the altered plot, though an improvement over the
-raw material, was not a masterpiece; it was only a
-better framework for masterly treatment.</p>
-
-<p>In the art of Shakespeare it is the telling, not the
-framework, of the story that counts. Hence any play
-of his becomes a poor thing indeed if you take away
-from it the tone-color of his words, the rhythm of his
-lines, the imaginative appeal of his imagery, the stimulating
-truth in his casual comment on character and
-deed. When a play of Shakespeare is filmed, those
-literary values are lost; it cannot in the nature of the
-motion picture be otherwise.</p>
-
-<p>On the other hand, the distinctive value and particular
-charm of a photoplay lies in its pictorial treatment,
-in what the director does pictorially with the
-subject in hand. And that distinctive value would in
-turn be lost if some one else attempted to transfer the
-picture to a literary medium.</p>
-
-<p>In view of all this it is surely fair to say that if a
-writer and a picture-maker were to co-operate in producing
-a piece of literature, the writer should be in
-command; but when they co-operate in producing a
-picture the picture-maker should be in command.</p>
-
-<p>Now when the director is in command of the story,
-what does he do with it? He may permit the incidents
-to stand in their original order, or he may change
-or omit or add. But in any case he sweeps away the
-phrases, sentences, and paragraphs which describe the
-places of the action, and erects instead real settings, or
-selects suitable “locations” from already existing settings.<span class="pagenum" id="Page_158">158</span>
-He marshals forth real human beings to perform
-the parts which are described in words. He
-divides the action into limited periods of time, and
-decides how to connect these periods visually so that
-the pictorial movement on the screen may be a flowing
-unity. The director, not the writer, does this;
-and, if he were satisfied to do less, he would be only
-partly a director. His work is not the “translation”
-of literature into motion pictures; it is a complete substitution
-of motion pictures for literature.</p>
-
-<p>When we analyze pictorial composition on the
-screen we must proceed as we have done throughout
-this book. We must look at it from the point of view
-of the spectator in the theater. The spectator does
-not see the setting with one eye and the actors with
-the other, he does not separate the respective movements
-of human beings, animals, trees, water, fire,
-etc., as they play before him, and he does not disconnect
-any one scene from the scenes which precede
-or follow it. To him everything on the screen is connected
-with everything else there. The connection
-may be strong or weak, bad or beautiful, but it is
-nevertheless a connection. This ought to be clear
-enough to any one who gives the matter any thought;
-yet there are scene designers who appear to believe
-that their setting is a complete work of art quite
-independent of the actors, for whom and with whom
-it ought to be composed, and there are certainly any
-number of players who look upon themselves as stars
-that dwell apart.</p>
-
-<p>We do not underestimate the individual power of
-the player as an interpreter of the deeds and emotions
-of dramatic characters. Pantomimic acting is one of<span class="pagenum" id="Page_159">159</span>
-the most personal of arts, yet the acting in a photoplay
-is a somewhat smaller factor in the total result
-than acting in the stage pantomime; and neither kind
-of acting can compare in importance with acting in
-the stage play, where the magic of the actor’s voice
-works its spell upon the audience.</p>
-
-<p>In the photoplay the player, whether at rest or in
-action, is usually the emphatic part of the picture; but
-he is only a part, and the relation between that part
-and the other parts of the picture can best be established
-by the director. If the player attempts to compose
-the picture in which he appears, he is handicapped,
-not only because he cannot see himself, but also because
-he cannot see any other portion of the composition
-from the same point of view as the ultimate spectator
-who is temporarily represented by the director.
-He is, in fact, in danger of spoiling his own pantomime,
-of destroying his own power.</p>
-
-<p>The frequent abuse of the close-up, for example,
-is often due to the mistaken idea that an actor’s facial
-expression is the sole means of representing emotion.
-To think that dramatic pantomime consists of making
-faces is just as foolish as to think that dancing is
-merely a matter of shaking the feet and legs. It is
-really as important for a screen actress to be able to
-show grief with her elbows or knees as for a dancer
-to have rhythm in her neck. The “star” actress, therefore,
-who insists on several facial close-ups per reel
-reveals a lack of capability in her own art, as well
-as an over-developed appreciation of her own looks.
-The further objection to the close-up is that it takes
-the player out of the picture. For the moment all the
-setting, all the other players are shut off from sight.<span class="pagenum" id="Page_160">160</span>
-It is as though a painter, while entertaining a group
-of friends with a view of a newly finished work, were
-suddenly to cover the whole painting except a single
-spot, and then to say, “Now forget the rest of the
-picture, and just look at this spot. Isn’t it wonderful?”</p>
-
-<p>The player should, of course, always be in perfect
-union with the rest of the picture, yet carrying as
-much emphasis as the story demands. But even when
-the player wisely desires to remain in the picture,
-he should not be allowed to determine his own position,
-pose, or movement there. He is, after all, only
-a glorified model with which the artist works.</p>
-
-<p>When an actress moves about in a room, for example,
-she cannot know that to the eye of the camera
-her nose seems to collide with the corner of the mantel-piece,
-that her neck is pressed out of shape by a bad
-shadow, that her gesture points out some gim-crack
-of no dramatic significance at the moment, that her
-movement is throwing her out of balance with some
-other movement in the scene, that her walking, sitting,
-or rising appears awkward, in spite of the fact
-that it feels natural and rhythmical to her. These and
-a thousand other accidents of composition can be
-avoided only by the player’s instant obedience to an
-alert and masterful director who can stop or guide
-the moving factor in the picture as surely as a painter
-can stop or guide his brush.</p>
-
-<p>When the action takes place out of doors, or in
-an interior setting with considerable depth, the player
-is still more ignorant of what the composition looks
-like to the eye of the camera. Whether the movement
-of a particular person will harmonize with a<span class="pagenum" id="Page_161">161</span>
-swaying willow tree and with the shadows playing
-over the ground, can be discovered only by experiments
-viewed from the angle of the camera. And
-even then, after the action has been carefully planned
-through a succession of rehearsals, it may have to be
-varied during the actual “shooting.” A sudden change
-of wind or light or an unexpected movement of a dog
-or horse may bring in a new factor that must be instantly
-taken into account.</p>
-
-<p>At the beginning and end of a scene the player
-should be especially pliable under the hands of the
-director, because the latter alone knows what the
-cinematic connection is to be with the preceding and
-following scenes. The lack of control in this pictorial
-continuity is often evident on the screen. Separate
-scenes become little dramas in themselves, and the
-whole photoplay is then really a succession of acts,
-with a structure always tending to fall apart, instead
-of cohering firmly into a unity. The peculiar difficulty
-in the movies is that the scenes are not taken
-in the same order as they are projected in the theater.
-On the screen the scenes shift more quickly than the
-actors could pass from one setting to the next, and
-yet the actual taking of those actions may have been
-weeks or even months apart. This is so because it is
-more economical to let the particular setting, and not
-the continuity of action, determine the grouping of
-the “shots.”</p>
-
-<p>Thus, for example, the scenes numbered 9, 22, 25,
-41, 98, and 133, with a drawing-room as setting, may
-all be taken on a single day, while numbers 8, 40,
-and 134, with a street as setting, may be taken some
-other day. And still another group of disconnected<span class="pagenum" id="Page_162">162</span>
-scenes may be taken a month later “on location” hundreds
-of miles away. This may be a fine system of
-efficiency for the manufacturer, but it often plays
-havoc with pictorial continuity. When an actress
-goes directly from scene 98 to 133, for example, she
-may be able to remember whether the latter scene is
-supposed to find her still single or already divorced,
-but she cannot be allowed to determine her own positions,
-pauses, tempo and general nature of movement,
-because that might spoil the transition from scene
-132, which is not to be “shot” until several days later!</p>
-
-<p>The farther we go into the study of the relation
-between the player and the rest of the motion picture,
-the more we realize that this relation can best be
-established and controlled by the director, and that
-the player is, in a sense, only a pigment with which
-the director paints.</p>
-
-<p>“But what of the movie fans?” you ask. “Are
-they not more interested in the performer as a performer
-than in the play as a play, or in the picture
-as a picture?” Yes, the audience is undoubtedly “crazy
-about the star,” but that is largely because they have
-not been given anything else to be crazy about. It
-is true that we all admire the distinction of individual
-performers in any kind of entertainment; yet we would
-not approve of a football game, for example, in which
-the “star” half-back made so many brilliant plays that
-the rest of the eleven could not prevent the opposing
-team from piling up a winning score, or of a baseball
-game which was lost because the batter with a world’s
-record refused to make a “sacrifice hit.” And, besides,
-a distinguished actor or actress may remain
-distinguished even after having submitted to the directing<span class="pagenum" id="Page_163">163</span>
-of the master cinema composer, just as a figure
-in a painting may still be fascinating even though the
-painter has made it a thoroughly organic part of the
-whole composition.</p>
-
-<div id="if_i_163" class="figcenter" style="max-width: 26em;">
- <img src="images/i_163.jpg" width="1658" height="2166" alt="" />
- <div class="caption"><i>Portrait of Charles I</i>, a painting by Van Dyck. The composition is
-characterized by rhythm of tone and line, balance of design, and
-skilful subordination of interests. Many of the principles that
-underlie good painting may be successfully applied in a motion
-picture. See <a href="#Page_80">page 80</a>.</div></div>
-
-<p>As the figure is really only a part of the motion
-picture so the setting is also only a part, and neither
-the setting nor the figure should be considered sufficient
-unto itself. One without the other is really incomplete;
-together they can be organized into a unified picture.
-This simple truth, always recognized by painters,
-has often been ignored, both by stage directors and
-motion picture directors. Perhaps the explanation is
-to be found in the materials with which the three
-different composers work. In a painting both the
-figure and the background are only paint, only representations
-side by side on a flat surface, and therefore
-easily admit of a perfect fusion of material. But
-in the case of stage drama the situation is different.
-The stage composition does not give us a similar natural
-blending of actor and background. The actor is
-a real human being, so near the spectators that some
-of them could touch him with their hands, while the
-background is merely an artificial representation of a
-room, a garden, or a cliff. The two elements of the
-stage picture refuse to mix, and the average spectator
-seems quite content to take them separately. In fact,
-it is not unusual for the audience to “give the scenery
-a hand” long before a single figure has entered to
-complete the composition.</p>
-
-<p>Now the screen picture is entirely different from
-the stage picture, because on the screen everything we
-see is photographic representation, mere gradations of
-light and shadow, just as everything on the canvas<span class="pagenum" id="Page_164">164</span>
-of a painting is paint. In the motion picture without
-color the boundary line of a window or a table is
-described in exactly the same medium as the contour
-of an actor’s face; and the actor’s complexion differs
-from the wall paper only in being lighter or darker.
-It should be impossible, therefore, to consider that
-the photoplay setting is a complete, independent picture,
-and that the actors are separate visible things
-merely placed in front of the setting. And if the
-movie director makes the mistake of not fusing actor
-and setting into a pictorial composition, it is perhaps
-because he imagines the spectator with himself in the
-studio, where the scene and action are like those of
-the stage, instead of putting himself with the spectator
-before the screen.</p>
-
-<p>But there are signs of awakening in the theater of
-the stage play. More and more the influence of such
-European masters as Max Reinhardt and Gordon
-Craig is being felt. According to their method of
-production the setting and the actors are interdependent
-and make a co-operative appeal to the eye of the
-audience. The young designers in the United States
-are beginning to think of the dramatic picture as a
-whole, rather than of the setting as a self-sufficient
-exhibition of their skill in painting. Mr. Lee Simonson,
-for example, not long ago, in commenting on his
-designs for the Theater Guild’s production of “The
-Faithful,” said that he purposely designed his sets so
-that they would seem top-heavy until the actors entered
-and filled in the comparatively empty zone near the
-bottom of the stage picture. Without the presence of
-the actor, he declared, one could never say that the
-set was good or bad; one could only say that it was<span class="pagenum" id="Page_165">165</span>
-incomplete. Such reasoning would do a great deal of
-good in the movie studios, from which a vast amount
-of silly publicity “dope” has come, announcing that this
-or that photoplay was highly artistic because such-and-such
-a well-known painter had been engaged to design
-the interior settings. One might as well say that a
-certain art student’s mural decoration was good because
-a famous master had begun the work by painting
-a background for the figures, or that a piece of
-music was beautiful because a master composer had
-written an accompaniment which somebody else had
-afterward combined with a melody.</p>
-
-<p>In the cinema composition the director must, of
-course, have mastery over the places, as well as over
-the persons of a film story. He can then make the
-setting a live, active part of the picture instead of
-merely a dead background; he may truly dramatize
-it.<a id="FNanchor_5" href="#Footnote_5" class="fnanchor">E</a> A notable example of the perfect blending of
-dramatic theme, actors, and setting is the German
-photoplay “The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari,” which was
-first shown to the American public in April, 1921.
-This film, produced by the Decla Company, was
-directed by Mr. Robert Wien, and the scenic designs
-were made by Herman Warm, Walter Reiman, and
-Walter Rork. When the “movie fan” sees the beginning
-of this photoplay he is startled by the strange
-shapes of places. Houses and rooms are not laid out
-four-square, but look as though they had been built
-by a cyclone and finished up by a thunderstorm. Windows
-are sick triangles, floors are misbehaved surfaces
-and shadows are streaked with gleaming white. Streets<span class="pagenum" id="Page_166">166</span>
-writhe as though in distress and the skies are of the
-inky blackness that fills even strong men with foreboding.
-The people are equally bizarre. They resemble
-cartoons rather than fellow humans, and their
-minds are strangely warped.</p>
-
-<div class="footnote">
-
-<p><a id="Footnote_5" href="#FNanchor_5" class="fnanchor">E</a> The subject of dramatizing a setting is discussed at length
-in Chapter VIII of “The Art of Photoplay Making.”</p>
-
-</div>
-
-<p>In the presence of all this the spectator feels that
-the screen has gone mad; yet he does not leave the
-theater, because his attention is chained and his emotions
-are beginning to surge with a peculiarly pleasing
-unrest. He stays and stares at the remarkable
-fitness of these crazy people in crazy places; for the
-story is, in fact, a madman’s fantasy of crimes committed
-by a sleep-walker under the hypnotic control
-of a physician who is the head of an insane asylum.</p>
-
-<p>When we examine this photoplay critically we discover,
-not only that the settings are perfectly sympathetic
-with the action, but that the various factors
-are skillfully organized into an excellent pictorial composition.
-Look, for example, at the “still,” facing
-<a href="#Page_179">page 179</a>, and you will observe the uncanny emphasis
-upon the dark sleep-walker who slinks along the wall
-and a moment later turns upward into the hallway on
-his evil errand to the bed-chamber of the heroine.
-Place that figure in an ordinary village alley and it
-will lose half its horror; keep it out of this weird
-setting and the place will cry out for some one to
-come into it in pursuit of crime.</p>
-
-<p>Study the plan of the pictorial design and you will
-see that as soon as the man has emerged from the
-shadows in the background he becomes the strongest
-accent in an area of white. The end of the alley from
-which he comes is accented by the jagged white shape
-above the shadows, and the doorway through which<span class="pagenum" id="Page_167">167</span>
-he goes is similarly accented by irregular shapes.
-These two accents keep the composition in balance,
-and when our glance passes from one to the other
-the path of attention must cross the area of central
-interest. There is rhythm in the composition, too,
-though one would scarcely realize it at first glance.
-Note the swinging curves in the white patch on the
-street and in the corresponding patch on the wall, and
-note also how some of these curves harmonize with
-the lines of the actor’s body and with his shadow upon
-the wall.</p>
-
-<p>The “still” which we have just analyzed is typical
-of the cinema scenes throughout “The Cabinet of Dr.
-Caligari.” Whether the subject is the unscrupulous
-Doctor in his office within the gates of the insane
-asylum, or the unnatural sleep-walker cramped in his
-cabinet, or the innocent girl asleep in a sea of white
-coverlets, or the gawking villagers at the fake shows
-of the fair, the two factors of person and place complete
-each other in a masterly composition. But that
-composition as a whole was not made either by the
-actors or by the designers of settings; they were happily
-helpful, but the director was the master composer.</p>
-
-<p>Any one who sees “The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari” is
-likely to remark that the settings would not be of
-much value in any story except the one for which
-they were designed. What a fine compliment to this
-photoplay as art! Perhaps some one long ago in the
-gray dawn of musical composition made a remark
-that the accompaniment in a certain piece of music
-could hardly serve for another melody than the one
-for which it was composed! At any rate let us hope<span class="pagenum" id="Page_168">168</span>
-that in the future the lover of the films may not look
-in vain for weird stories in uncanny haunts, for fairy
-tales in whimsical nooks, for epic dramas in spacious
-domains, for comedies in funny places; and let us
-hope, too, that he will find the compositions so perfect
-that not a single setting would have any artistic value
-apart from its own story.</p>
-
-<p>“But what of nature?” says some one. “Must the
-movie director have mastery over the works of the
-Creator, too?” Indeed he must! Because if he is an
-artist he is a creator; and if nature becomes a medium
-in his art, then he must have mastery over that medium
-insofar as it enters the art. Hills have been levelled,
-streams have been dried up, and valleys have been
-filled with water, all for the welfare or profit of man.
-Mastery of this kind costs money; but are not the
-movie magnates noted for their fearlessness in signing
-checks?</p>
-
-<p>Wealthy men have been known to build landscapes
-for their own pleasure; there is no very valid reason
-why they should not build landscapes for their own
-business, especially when that business is an art. The
-movie director of to-day wears out automobiles searching
-the country for “locations” that will do as natural
-backgrounds for screen stories; and in this enthusiasm
-he is almost as amateurish as the kodak fiend who
-scours the country for good things to snap. The movie
-director of some to-morrow will not look for natural
-backgrounds; he will make them.</p>
-
-<p>When an artist paints a picture of a natural subject
-he does not try to reproduce exactly the material things
-which he sees before him. He rises far above the
-craft of the copyist into the divinity of creation. His<span class="pagenum" id="Page_169">169</span>
-painting is always a personal variation of the natural
-theme. If seven trees suit his composition better
-than the seventeen which he views, he paints only
-seven, and if there are only five in the grove, he
-creates two more on his canvas. If the waterfall is
-too high or too violent he reshapes it into the ideal
-one of his vision. This he does, not because nature
-is not beautiful in most of her aspects, but because
-no single one of those aspects fits into the scheme of
-the new beauty which he as an artist is trying to
-create.</p>
-
-<p>But the cinema composer does not work in so plastic
-a medium as paint. The camera is only a recording
-machine, working without the power of altering what
-it sees. The subject must be altered by the director
-before the camera man begins “shooting.” On a small
-scale this is perhaps already being done. Bushes, for
-example, may be cleared out from among the trees,
-and possibly even a tree or two may be chopped
-down in order to facilitate the carrying on of certain
-dramatic actions. We should like to see the ax wielded
-also in the cause of such things as simplicity, or
-balance, or rhythm in pictorial composition. Already
-bridges are being built especially for certain scenes in
-photoplays. We should like to see the cinema engineers
-called upon also to put an extra bend in the
-creek, or to make the waterfall only half as large, or
-to shape the bank into a more graceful slope whenever
-any change of that sort might serve to organize
-the setting more harmoniously with the general design
-of the picture.</p>
-
-<p>Already grass has been mown to suit a director.
-We should like to see grass grown especially for the<span class="pagenum" id="Page_170">170</span>
-director. They already make sunshine and wind and
-rain for motion pictures. We should like to see
-trees planted and tended for a dozen or fifty years,
-if necessary, in order to provide a more pictorial natural
-background for one or a dozen film stories.</p>
-
-<p>In thus advocating a new art of cinema landscape
-gardening we do not mean to imply that nature untouched
-is not full of beauty. We know well enough
-that the rhythm of line in the horizon of a rolling
-country, or in the lights and shadows of trees massed
-in the distance is often a delight to the beholder. But
-natural beauty of that sort is admissible to a cinema
-composition only when it is itself the dramatic theme
-of the story, and can be emphasized by the introduction
-of human figures or other elements, or when it
-can be subordinated to something else which is the
-dramatic theme. If nature cannot be thus composed
-she may still be photographed by the maker of scenics,
-travel pictures, etc., but she is of no practical value
-to the director of photoplays.</p>
-
-<p>But there is perhaps a question brewing in some
-reader’s mind. “Would it not be ridiculously extravagant,”
-he asks, “to construct a real landscape especially
-for a photoplay, since you maintain that any particular
-setting, if it is a proper part of a good composition,
-will have little artistic value apart from the particular
-action for which it has been designed?”</p>
-
-<p>Yes, it would certainly be extravagant to spend ten
-years producing a natural setting which could be used
-only for two days of movie “shooting.” But our
-theories really do not lead to any such conclusion.
-First, any landscape which has been designed especially
-for cinema composition, can be “shot” from fifty or<span class="pagenum" id="Page_171">171</span>
-a hundred different points of view, and yet can have
-separate artistic value from every angle. And, second,
-any such landscape would alter itself periodically and
-gradually through seasons and years. And, third, the
-cinema landscape engineer could make considerable
-alterations again and again without destroying the
-landscape. Thus, even if only a single square mile
-of land were used, it might well serve a film company
-for a number of years; and meanwhile other
-landscapes would be in the making on other square
-miles of land. However, it is not the critic’s business
-to enter into the ways and means of financing the
-production of art. He only undertakes to express
-the refined taste of the thoughtful public, the public
-which in the long run it will pay the producers to
-please.</p>
-
-<p>We desire the director’s mastery in the movies to
-extend also to that phase of pictorial composition
-which is known as the “cutting and joining” of scenes.
-Bad work in this department of photoplay making is
-something which cannot be counteracted by the most
-inspired pantomime, by the most beautiful setting, or
-by the most perfect composition in the separate scenes.
-Without careful cutting and joining the photoplay can
-never achieve that dynamic movement, that rhythmical
-flow which is a characteristic and distinguishing quality
-of the motion picture as art. It should be as important
-for the cinema composer to decide upon the
-progression and transformation of scenes as it is for
-the poet to arrange the order and transitions of his
-own verses and stanzas, or for the musical composer
-to arrange the movement through the music which he
-writes. Some directors seem to forget that a piece<span class="pagenum" id="Page_172">172</span>
-of art can exert its power only through that final
-form which comes in direct contact with the appreciator.
-And many of the others who desire to preserve
-their work intact must gnash their teeth at the
-thought that no matter how carefully they may cut and
-join a film, it is likely to be marred before it reaches
-the projecting machine.</p>
-
-<p>An example of the amazing lack of artistic co-operation
-in the movie world is furnished by the following
-press notice, sent out from one of the largest
-moving picture theaters on Broadway. “Audiences
-who see a film projected on the screen at the ——
-Theater, seldom take the details connected with its
-showing into consideration. It is a well-known fact
-that a photoplay is seldom presented at the —— in
-the form it is received from the manufacturer. Every
-foot of film is carefully perused and cuts are made,
-either for complete elimination or for replacement
-in a more appropriate part of the story.”</p>
-
-<p>Add to such deliberate desecration the havoc
-wrought by censors and by the eliminations caused
-by fire or breakage and you have a prospect of butchery
-which is bad enough to make any artist drop his
-work in despair. There is no hope for him unless
-he can organize his photoplay so perfectly and make
-its definite final form so compellingly beautiful that
-even a dull mechanician in a projecting booth would
-recognize it as a sacred thing which must be kept
-intact as it came from the hands of the master.</p>
-
-<p>But a photoplay is often robbed of pictorial continuity
-long before it reaches the exhibitor. The
-“title-writer,” who frequently combines his office with
-that of “cutter,” is at best, a dangerous collaborator<span class="pagenum" id="Page_173">173</span>
-on a photoplay. Words in the form of titles, sub-titles,
-dialogue, comments, etc., are rarely in place on the
-screen. If they are admitted for the purpose of telling
-or explaining a part of the story, they come as a
-slur on the art of the motion picture, and often as
-an insult to the intelligence of the spectator.<a id="FNanchor_6" href="#Footnote_6" class="fnanchor">F</a> Nevertheless,
-the producer finds words practically useful
-as stop-gaps, padding, and general support for an
-ill-directed play that would otherwise have to be
-scrapped. And even the most prominent directors are
-inclined to lean heavily on words. We are doomed,
-therefore, to endure the hybrid art of reading matter
-mixed with illustrations, at least for many years to
-come. But we insist that this mixture shall be no
-worse than the director makes it.</p>
-
-<div class="footnote">
-
-<p><a id="Footnote_6" href="#FNanchor_6" class="fnanchor">F</a> Words which appear as an organic part of the action,
-such as writing, print, sign-boards, etc., do not come under
-the general category of “cut-in titles.” For a discussion of
-the dramatic value of words on the screen see Chapter IX of
-“The Art of Photoplay Making.”</p>
-
-</div>
-
-<p>After a director has carefully composed a series of
-scenes so that the motions and patterns and textures
-and tones dissolve, from one moment to the next,
-in a rhythmical flow, regardless of how the story may
-have shifted its setting, we do not want some film
-doctor to come along and break that unity into pieces
-for the sake of a few jokes, or near-jokes, or for a
-few words of schoolroom wisdom or of sentimental
-gush. We object, not only to the content, the denotation
-of such “titles,” but also to their pictorial
-appearance.</p>
-
-<p>That written words have pictorial appearance is a
-fact which most of us forgot as soon as we learned
-to read. We realize that Chinese characters or Egyptian<span class="pagenum" id="Page_174">174</span>
-hieroglyphics are pictorial, that they are drawings;
-but we forget that the characters and arrangements
-of our own writing and printing are also drawings.
-Judged as pictures the words on the screen are
-usually too severely white for the background. They
-fairly flash at you. Also the horizontal lines made
-by the tops and bottoms of the letters constitute a
-sort of grill-work which hardly ever blends pictorially
-with the pattern of the preceding or following scene.</p>
-
-<p>As to the design of the letters themselves we find
-considerable variety on the screen, often with no direct
-reference to the meaning of the words or to the picture
-where they are inserted. Thus the tendency to
-introduce y’s and g’s with magnificent sweeping tails,
-or capital letters in fantastic curves, while revealing
-a commendable impulse to make writing pictorial, often
-leads to overemphasis, or to a direct conflict with
-other pictorial values in the film.<a id="FNanchor_7" href="#Footnote_7" class="fnanchor">G</a></p>
-
-<div class="footnote">
-
-<p><a id="Footnote_7" href="#FNanchor_7" class="fnanchor">G</a> A neat pictorial touch in the titles of the German play,
-“The Golem,” is the suggestion of Hebrew script in the
-shaping of the letters.</p>
-
-</div>
-
-<p>Furthermore, the eye-movement over reading matter
-should be considered with reference to the eye-movement
-over the adjoining pictures. For example,
-after the title has been shown long enough to allow
-the normal reader to get to the end of the text, his
-eye may be at a point near the lower right corner or
-at the right side of the frame. Then if the following
-picture does not attract attention at this portion
-of the frame, a slight shock is caused by the necessary
-jump to a remote point of attention. A similar difficulty
-may arise in connecting a preceding picture with
-the beginning of the title.</p>
-
-<p>Many directors have endeavored to make the title<span class="pagenum" id="Page_175">175</span>
-sections of a film more pictorial by introducing decorative
-drawings or paintings around the words, and
-even by introducing miniature motion pictures. Decorations
-in motion, however, are not to be recommended,
-because they distract attention from the words
-of the title, as has been illustrated in the discussion
-of “The Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse,” on page
-46, and because they do not readily compose with
-those words to form a single picture. It is, in fact,
-as inartistic to “vision in” motion pictures on the background
-of a title as to “vision in” words on the background
-of a motion picture. In either case you really
-get two pictures within one frame.</p>
-
-<p>Fixed decorations around a title may fill a pictorial
-need in unifying the portions of the film which have
-been cut apart by the insert. They may bridge the
-gap with a continuity of tone or line or shape, and
-may by their meaning preserve the dramatic mood of
-the photoplay. But here, too, caution must be observed
-lest the decorations draw attention away from
-the words or fail to compose well with the pictorial
-character of those words.</p>
-
-<p>The problem of words on the screen does not seem
-very near a solution. There will doubtless be a great
-deal of juggling with titles before some magician
-comes who can “vanish” them completely from the
-fabric of a photoplay. Already photoplays such as
-“The Old Swimmin’ Hole,” directed by Joseph De
-Grasse and “The Journey’s End,” directed by Hugo
-Ballin, have been successfully produced without sub-titles.
-Some day, we hope, the wordless picture play
-will no longer be a novelty.</p>
-
-<p>Another factor, which has already become troublesome,
-is the reproduction of color in the motion picture.<span class="pagenum" id="Page_176">176</span>
-If the director were a genuine colorist, and
-if he could produce the exact tint or shade of hue
-which the particular composition needs, and if this
-could be projected so that the spectator would really
-see what the director wanted him to see, then the
-conditions would be ideal for mastery in color movies.
-Such conditions may some day come, but they are not
-here now.</p>
-
-<p>It is possible that the machinery of color photography
-will become so perfect that the spectator may
-be able to see on the screen the exact color values
-which were found in the subject photographed. But
-that will be only a triumph of science. It will be a
-scientific achievement of the same kind as the correct
-reproduction of colors in a lithograph or color-gravure
-of a painting. But art lies in the production and
-arrangement, not in the reproduction, of colors.</p>
-
-<p>An elementary study of painting must convince any
-one that the colors which the artist puts on the canvas
-are really only suggested by the model or subject,
-and that his arrangement of them is inspired by an
-ideal personal conception, rather than a desire to reproduce
-something with absolute accuracy. Therein
-lies creation and mastery. Hence, there is no artistic
-advantage to a cinema composer in having machines
-which can make a green dress appear green, and a red
-rose, red, on the screen, unless that particular green
-and that particular red in that particular combination
-really add beauty to the picture.</p>
-
-<p>The “tinted” scenes, usually blue or orange, which
-are so familiar in the movies, are not color photographs,
-since they are produced by immersing an ordinary
-black and white film in a bath of dye. But
-from an artistic point of view they are better than<span class="pagenum" id="Page_177">177</span>
-color photographs. In the first place, the value of the
-tint can be controlled by the director, or at least by the
-person who does the tinting. And in the second place,
-although the lights of the film take the strongest tint,
-the shadows are also affected by it; and the entire
-picture, therefore, gets a tonal unity which is never
-present in color photography. However, even “tinted”
-scenes should be used with caution, because, when they
-are cut into a film which is elsewhere black and white,
-they break the unity of tonal flow, and usually get far
-more emphasis than their meaning in the story demands.
-The effect is almost as bad as that of the
-old family photograph which baby sister has improved
-by touching up a single figure with pretty water colors.</p>
-
-<p>Thus we have indicated the many departments and
-stages of development in a photoplay composition, the
-many pictorial forces which should be controlled by a
-single hand. That single hand holds the reins of
-many powers. And, if those powers cannot be so
-guided that they pull in the same direction, with
-similar speeds, and with balanced efforts, then their
-combination is disastrous, however elegant and blue-ribboned
-any individual power may be. In the photoplay
-neither the plot action, nor the acting, nor the
-setting, nor the cutting and joining, nor the titles,
-nor the coloring, nor any other element can be allowed
-to pull in its own wild way. And in any single section
-of the motion picture the fixed design and the
-movement, the accentuation and the harmony, the
-work and the play, must be co-ordinated and all this
-technique must itself be subordinate to spontaneous
-enduring inspiration. Without such mastery no movie-maker
-can ever win to the far goal of art.</p>
-
-<hr />
-
-<div id="toclink_178" class="chapter">
-<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_178">178</span></p>
-
-<h2 class="nobreak" id="CHAPTER_XI">CHAPTER XI<br />
-
-<span class="subhead">THE MYSTERIOUS EMOTIONS OF ART</span></h2>
-</div>
-
-<p class="in0"><span class="firstword">The</span> end of all aspiring mastery in the movies is to
-provide for every beholder the thrills of art. These
-thrills are not like the emotions which are aroused
-by other experiences of life, by sports, for example,
-or adventure, or amusements, or industry, or war.
-They are stirring experiences quite different from
-those of him who makes a “home run” or a “touch-down,”
-or “loops the loop” in the air, or sinks a submarine,
-or has a play accepted, or discovers a new
-way of evading some obnoxious law. It is true that
-the dramatic content of a photoplay may sometimes
-seem so real that the beholder forgets where he is
-and responds with such natural feelings as fear and
-triumph, love and hate, pride, selfish desire and hope;
-but it is also true that the pictorial form of a photoplay,
-that is, the mere arrangement of the substance,
-considered apart from its meaning, can arouse strange,
-pleasurable emotions which are peculiar to the enjoyment
-of art.</p>
-
-<p>When we recall the masterpieces of painting which
-have thrilled us we must admit that much of their
-appeal came from other factors besides the content
-of the picture. Think of a portrait of some Dutchman
-painted by Rembrandt. The painting stirs you
-as the Dutchman himself in real life never could have<span class="pagenum" id="Page_179">179</span>
-stirred you. You may be impressed by the likeness
-of the portrait, by the engaging character of the person
-portrayed, and by some significant truth expressed
-in that portrayal. But that is not all. You are also
-stirred by the colors in the painting, by the peculiar
-arrangement of lines and shapes. That emotion which
-you get from the form and medium itself, rather than
-from the subject, is a characteristic art-emotion.</p>
-
-<div id="if_i_179" class="figcenter" style="max-width: 35em;">
- <img src="images/i_179.jpg" width="2182" height="1647" alt="" />
- <div class="caption">From <i>The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari</i>. A remarkable example of “stylization” in the
-movies, showing how setting, figure, and action may be harmonized to express the
-dominant mood of the photoplay. See <a href="#Page_165">pages 165</a> and <a href="#Page_180">180</a>.</div></div>
-
-<p>We are not now speaking of such qualities as unity,
-emphasis, balance, and rhythm. They are indeed fundamental
-needs in pictorial composition, and yet a
-photoplay may have all of those qualities without
-possessing any strong appeal as art. A motion picture,
-like a painting, must possess other, more subtle,
-qualities if it is to make any lasting impression upon
-our souls. What these mysterious qualities really are,
-we do not presume to know. At the same time we
-believe that a discussion of them will be stimulating
-and helpful both to “movie fans” and movie makers.
-Suppose we endeavor to isolate four of these mysterious
-qualities in art and call them poignancy, appeal
-to the imagination, exquisiteness, and reserve.</p>
-
-<p>Any one who goes frequently to the movies must
-have felt more than once a certain poignancy, a strange
-fascination in some pictorial arrangement, in some
-curiously appealing movement on the screen. Perhaps
-such a feeling came when you saw a “dissolve” for
-the first time. Perhaps the slow dying away of a
-scene, even while a new one was dawning before you,
-gave a pang of pleasure never felt before, not even
-in the magic blending of dreams. A “queer feeling”
-you may have called it, and you may have been less
-aware of it as the novelty wore off in later shows.<span class="pagenum" id="Page_180">180</span>
-Then it came again when you saw an accelerated motion
-picture which showed a plant growing from seed
-to blossom within a few minutes. And still again you
-felt it when in some slow-motion picture you saw a
-horse floating through the air. But time went on and
-the frequent repetition of these effects made their
-appeal less poignant.</p>
-
-<p>In each case the thing that stirred you was due to
-a novelty of mechanics, a trick of cinematography.
-But you can get that emotion without waiting for a
-new mechanical invention. It may come also from
-the pictorial composition, from some peculiar patternings
-of things, whether fixed or moving, within the
-picture itself. A striking illustration of this may be
-found in the German photoplay, “The Cabinet of Dr.
-Caligari,” which has been described in the preceding
-chapter. It contains at least two scenes in which
-extremely simple arrangements kindle strange flares
-of emotion. One of these moments comes in the
-scene which is represented by the “still” shown opposite
-<a href="#Page_179">page 179</a>. Here we see Cesare, the hypnotized
-sleep-walker, slinking along an alley of weird lights
-and shadows. We know from earlier scenes that he
-is bent on committing some new crime. His face is
-ghastly and his lanky frame is tightly clothed in black.
-He emerges into a bright glare and stretches forth
-his arm in an unhuman gesture, as though he were
-going to glide serpent-wise up the very side of the
-wall. This movement makes a strange pattern and
-sends through us a flash of—shall we call it a sweet
-shudder or a horrible delight?—something poignant
-and unforgettable.</p>
-
-<p>A similar experience of emotion comes to us a few<span class="pagenum" id="Page_181">181</span>
-minutes later in the same play when Cesare carries
-off the heroine from her bedchamber. This scene
-reveals a broad sea of billowy linen, evidently a bed,
-yet large enough for a whole bevy of heroines. Cesare
-appears outside a window, which seems to crumble at
-his touch. He enters the chamber and, dagger in hand,
-reaches out toward the head of the sleeping lady.
-We gasp at her fate, because we forget that this is
-only a play. That gasp is an expression of pity, a
-familiar emotion. But a mysterious emotion is in
-store for us. Cesare is spellbound by the lady’s beauty.
-He drops his dagger. Then suddenly he gathers her
-up, and, holding her against the side of his body,
-starts for the window. As he does so a sudden striking
-pattern is produced by the movement. In his
-haste Cesare has caught up some of the bed linen
-along with his prey, and this white expanse darts after
-him in a sudden inward-rushing movement from the
-remote corners of the bed. Instantly a strange sensation
-shoots through us. This sharp emotion, both
-painful and pleasing, is not pity, or hate, or fear. It
-does not relate itself to the villain’s violence against
-an innocent, defenseless girl. It is merely a “queer
-feeling” caused by that striking motion-pattern of the
-snowy linen whisked unexpectedly from the bed.</p>
-
-<p>To one who has been emotionally affected by such
-things as the “dissolve” and retarded motion and the
-peculiar effects in “Dr. Caligari” the above paragraphs
-may give some idea of what we mean by poignancy
-in composition. It is a real quality tinged with an
-unreality that allies it with the effects which we experience
-in dreams. Any cinema composer who can strike
-this note of poignancy at least once in every photoplay<span class="pagenum" id="Page_182">182</span>
-that he produces may justly demand that his work be
-classed with the fine arts.</p>
-
-<p>Another elusive quality, found all too seldom in the
-movies, is the appeal to imagination. Such an appeal
-may come from things in real life or from that life
-which art reflects; it may come also from the artist’s
-medium and composition. Thus, for example, some
-people can imagine melodious sounds when they look
-at colors in a painting, and nearly every one can imagine
-colors when listening to music. The motion
-picture’s appeal to the imagination has been treated
-at some length in Chapter VI of “The Art of Photoplay
-Making,” and we shall, therefore, be brief about
-it here. An illustration may be furnished by a sea-shell.
-We hold it to our ears and hear a low musical
-sound which makes us imagine the surf of the sea,
-sweetly vague. A similar, yet more subtle, delight
-may come from a picture of some person doing the
-same thing. Such a picture is to be found in the
-Fox film version of Longfellow’s “Evangeline.”
-Gabriel picks up a sea-shell and holds it to his ear.
-Instantly we imagine the sound which he hears. We
-also imagine the sea which that imagined sound suggests.
-And, if we are particularly sensitive, we may
-even try to imagine what Gabriel imagines. All this
-is delightful, a genuine emotional response to the art
-of the screen. But we are immediately insulted by
-an ugly anti-climax. Quick as a flash, our fancies
-are killed by a cut-in picture of a stretch of real sea.
-Now we must look; we may no longer imagine.</p>
-
-<p>The above is a typical example of both imaginative
-and unimaginative treatment in a motion picture. Any
-reader can go to the movies and collect a hundred<span class="pagenum" id="Page_183">183</span>
-similar examples in a few evenings. Over and over
-again a director will lead us to the threshold of beautiful
-fancy, only to slam the door of hard realism
-against our faces. Why is this? Is it because the
-director thinks that audiences are incapable of exercising
-and enjoying their imaginations? Or is it only
-because he wants to get more footage for the film?</p>
-
-<p>As though it were not bad enough to spoil the
-pictorial beauty of cinema composition, many directors
-proceed to spoil the charm of other arts, too.
-Poetry, for instance, may weave her spells elsewhere,
-but not upon the screen. Even the simplest poetic
-statement must be vulgarized by explanation. “Movie
-fans” are not considered intelligent enough to be
-trusted with the enjoyment of even such harmless
-imagery as</p>
-
-<div class="poetry-container">
-<div class="poetry">
- <div class="stanza">
- <div class="verse indentq">“There is a tide in the affairs of men</div>
- <div class="verse indent0">Which taken at the turn leads on to fortune.”</div>
- </div>
-</div>
-</div>
-
-<p class="in0">During all the three hundred years since those lines
-were written, probably no illustrator of Shakespeare’s
-plays ever felt called upon to draw a picture of that
-tide, and probably no actor ever strove to represent
-it on the stage by voice or gesture. But in De Mille’s
-photoplay “Male and Female,” where the passage is
-quoted, the lines on the screen must be accompanied by
-a photograph of surf, which was evidently intended
-to represent the tide!</p>
-
-<p>Shakespeare’s poetic image was thus killed by a
-single shot. But it sometimes takes more ingenuity to
-destroy a charm. Take, for instance, this descriptive
-line from “Evangeline”:</p>
-
-<div class="blockquot">
-
-<p>“When she had passed, it seemed like the ceasing of exquisite
-music.”</p>
-</div>
-
-<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_184">184</span></p>
-
-<p>Those words are surely full of emotional, imaginative
-appeal. Yes, but not for the director of the
-Fox “Evangeline.” He inserts the line as a title, then
-shows Evangeline strolling over a forest path, and then
-“cuts in” a close-up of hands playing across the
-strings of a gigantic harp!</p>
-
-<p>There is nothing mysterious about the emotions of
-any moderately intelligent person who sees things like
-that on the screen. “Movie stuff!” he groans, and wonders
-“how they have the nerve to get away with it.”
-We have a quarrel with the director, not because he
-has failed to picturize the imagined sweetness of
-that silence which comes when exquisite music has
-ceased, but because he has considered it necessary
-to picturize anything at all in support of the poet’s
-words.</p>
-
-<p>This brings us again to the question whether art
-should strive to present any beauty other than that
-of the subject represented. Was he a great artist who,
-according to an old fable, painted fruit so realistically
-that the birds came to peck at it? And would Michelangelo
-have been a better artist if he had given his
-marble statues the colors of real flesh, or if he had
-made statues with flesh soft to the touch and capable
-of perspiring on a hot day? We think not.</p>
-
-<p>Art may please through illusion, but never by deception.
-We get a peculiar emotional experience from
-imagining that Michelangelo’s “Moses” is alive with
-human grandeur, but we should not like to be caught
-in a mob of idiots staring at some more realistically
-sculptural Moses, in the expectation that he was about
-to make a speech or perform a trick. Neither can we
-go into ecstasies over the fact that the fur mantle in<span class="pagenum" id="Page_185">185</span>
-some portrait is so skillfully painted that all the women
-want to stroke it.</p>
-
-<p>The depressing thing about many movies is that
-they are to the ideal photoplay what the wax figure
-of a shop window is to sculpture. Instead of dancing
-lightly through a rich atmosphere of suggestion they
-are anchored heavily with bolts of dollar-marked
-material. And worse days are to come if the “stunt”
-workers are fed with applause. They promise us pictures
-in natural colors, more natural than any now
-produced. They promise us pictures that have depth
-so real that the beholder may be tempted to take a
-stroll into them. They promise us pictures that talk,
-and whistle, and chirp, and bark. And perhaps somewhere
-they are even promising pictures that will give
-off scents.</p>
-
-<p>All these wonders will create industrial activity.
-They will make good advertising, and will doubtless
-bring crowds to the theaters. But they will not bring
-happiness to those fortunate individuals who can enjoy
-art because it is art, who can get a finer thrill from a
-painting that felicitously suggests interesting trees,
-than from one which looks so much like a real orchard
-that the birds and bees swarm in through the gallery
-doors.</p>
-
-<p>Let the motion picture look like a motion picture
-of life, and not like life itself. Let the mobilization
-of characters in a photoplay start fancies and stir emotions
-finer and deeper than any which we can experience
-by observing our neighbors or by reading sensational
-newspapers. Let the lights and shadows on the
-screen, the lines and shapes, the patterns and movements
-suggest to our imaginations richer beauties than<span class="pagenum" id="Page_186">186</span>
-those which are actually shown to our eyes. Let the
-motion picture become as romantic as music, and yet
-remain equally consistent with reality and truth.</p>
-
-<p>Thus we have considered two mysterious art-emotions,
-namely, that which is aroused by a peculiar
-artistic poignancy in the cinema design itself, and
-that which is aroused when the suggestions and associations
-of the design make our own imaginations
-creative. A third art-emotion comes from the conscious
-or sub-conscious appreciation of something
-exquisite in the finished product.</p>
-
-<p>Exquisite values and exquisite combinations are
-present in the masterpieces of every art. The sweet
-blending of musical tones which leads into a delicacy
-of overtones that no ear can distinguish; the subtle
-shadings of color in a painting, soft touches of pictorial
-harmony which can be felt more surely than
-they can be seen; tender curves in the most vigorous
-statue, and marble surfaces surging so slightly that
-their shadows scarcely linger; crisp edges of acanthus
-leaves in a Greek capital and the almost imperceptible
-swelling of the column beneath; the sparkle, the caper
-and the organ-music of a poem you love—these are
-the exquisite things in art. And there are many others
-less tangible. They thrill you again and again with
-feelings too refined for description in words.</p>
-
-<p>Can the motion picture achieve a similar refinement?
-Or must it always deserve the epithet “crude”?
-When half of the typical movie’s brute strength and
-snorting speed can be exchanged for tenderness and
-spirituality we shall have a new era in cinema history.
-That era may dawn while the doubters are still slumbering.
-Even now we occasionally see motion pictures<span class="pagenum" id="Page_187">187</span>
-which are sparkling without the so-called “flashes”
-of scenes, pictures which flow firmly, one into the next,
-with delicate mingling of tones and patterns, pictures
-in which sometimes the moving elements are as airy as
-gossamer threads blown by a fairy’s breath.</p>
-
-<p>This quality of exquisiteness is something which
-the director cannot produce by taking thought or
-signing a contract. Other values he may develop by
-study and experiment, but not this one. He may bring
-balance and unity to his pictorial elements; he may
-accent the interests properly; he may succeed in starting
-a vital rhythm and stimulating the beholder’s fancy,
-all this through determined application of skill; but
-he will need the help of inspiration before he can
-create the charm of exquisiteness. The gods have
-granted that mysterious help to other artists; they
-will grant it to the cinema composer, too, whenever
-he proves worthy.</p>
-
-<p>There is at least another peculiar art-emotion which
-the cinema composer should be able to arouse. It is
-the emotion which comes over us at the overwhelming
-discovery that a given masterpiece of art has a wealth
-of beauty that we can never hope to exhaust. That
-emotion is stimulated by the reserve which lies back
-of all really masterful performance in art. We feel
-it when we have read a poem for the twentieth time
-and know that if we read it again we shall find new
-beauties and deeper meaning. We feel it in a concert
-hall listening to a symphony that has been played for
-us repeatedly since childhood and yet reveals fresh
-beauties to our maturing powers of appreciation. We
-feel it in the mystic dimness of some cathedral beneath
-whose arches a score of generations have prayed and<span class="pagenum" id="Page_188">188</span>
-the most eloquent disbeliever of today stands gaping
-in silence. Behind the human power which wrote the
-poem, or composed the music, or built the cathedral
-lies a vast reserve; and, though it was not drawn upon,
-we seem to glimpse that reserve forever in the finished
-masterpiece.</p>
-
-<p>Has any reader of this book gone to see the same
-photoplay ten times? And if so, why? Was it because
-of some irresistible, undying lure in the content
-of that photoplay or in the pictorial form of that
-content? Did you go of your own free will? Did
-you even make a sacrifice to see it the tenth time?
-If so, then you have known the calm joy of a reserve
-power in the newest of the arts.</p>
-
-<p>Unfortunately reserve is not characteristic of the
-movies. It is seldom indeed that a photoplay contains
-anything of value that cannot be caught during the
-first showing. In fact, it happens rather frequently
-that a photoplay uses up every ounce of its own proper
-power and then is forced to call in the help of something
-known as “padding” before it measures up to
-the commercial fullness of five reels, or whatever the
-contract stipulates. If you poke around through this
-padding, you will find that it is usually made up of
-innocent kittens, ducklings, calves, human babies, and
-other “ain’t-it-cunnin’” stuff, which may arouse emotions,
-to be sure, but not the emotions which make up
-the enjoyment of art as art.</p>
-
-<p>Another typical lack of reserve is illustrated in the
-building and decoration of settings. Avalanches of
-furniture are apparently necessary to show that a character
-is well-to-do. The heroine’s boudoir must look
-like a gift shop, and her dressing table like a drug<span class="pagenum" id="Page_189">189</span>
-store counter, in order to convince the audience that
-she spends a few sacred moments of the day attending
-to her finger nails. Walls of rooms must be
-paneled off by scores of framed pictures, mirrors, etc.,
-so that, no matter where the actor stands, his head
-will be strikingly set off by some ornamental frame.
-Floors must look partly like an Oriental bazaar and
-partly like a fur market. Chairs, tables, cabinets, beds,
-and what-nots, must carry our minds to Versailles and
-the Bronx, to Buckingham Palace, and Hollywood.
-Hangings of plush and silk, tapestries of cloth of
-gold, curtains of lace or batiked silk, cords of intricate
-plaiting, must flow from the heights, waving in
-the breeze to prove that they are real. All this extravagance
-must be, we presume, in order to show
-that the heroine lives on an income and not a salary,
-and in order to give the brides in the audience new
-ideas for mortgaging their husbands’ futures at the
-installment-plan stores.</p>
-
-<p>With such extravagance of materials in a picture
-there can be no simplicity or reserve in the pictorial
-composition, if indeed there can be any composition
-at all. Whatever design the director gives
-to the miscellaneous lines and shapes will seem rather
-like a last despairing effort than the easy, happy touch
-of a master’s hand.</p>
-
-<p>The hysterical extravagance of the movies is further
-illustrated in the breathless speed which so often
-characterizes every moving thing on the screen. We
-feel that, at the end of the road, horses must expire
-from exhaustion and automobiles must catch fire from
-excessive friction. Clouds are driven by hurricanes,
-rivers shoot, trees snap, and the most dignified gentleman<span class="pagenum" id="Page_190">190</span>
-dog-trots. It is true that some of this breathlessness
-carries with it a certain thrill for the spectator,
-but that thrill is by no means to be classed as
-an æsthetic emotion. It has nothing of that abiding
-joy which comes from the consciousness of restrained
-energy in art.</p>
-
-<p>Much of this feverish activity, this “jazz” of the
-screen, is due to rapidity of projection; and yet the
-director is responsible, for he certainly knows the
-probable rate of projection and can control his composition
-accordingly by retarding actions or by selecting
-slower actions in place of those which cannot be
-retarded. Slowness of movement, where it is not
-unnatural, is pleasant to the eye, as we have said in
-preceding chapters, but it has a peculiar appeal for the
-emotions, too. It fills us with a sense of the majesty
-that none can shake, of the deep currents that none
-can turn aside.</p>
-
-<p>How to produce a picture that shall impress an
-audience with its inexhaustible reserve is a secret that
-remains with him who has the power. So, too, with
-the other pictorial qualities discussed in this chapter.
-We know of no formulas by which the mysterious
-art-emotions can be aroused. Yet if directors and
-spectators alike ponder over these mysteries, it will
-surely help them to separate the gold from the dross.</p>
-
-<p>Let us vision an ideal photoplay. It is entrancing,
-yet restful, to the eye. Its composition is both vigorous
-and graceful, as harmonious as music. Our sympathies
-are stirred warmly by the experiences of the
-persons in the story. We are held in keen suspense
-as to the dramatic outcome. And we get also the
-more subtle art-emotions. Our souls are shot through<span class="pagenum" id="Page_191">191</span>
-by the poignancy of fixed and flowing designs. We
-are fascinated by these designs at the same time that
-our fancies pass through and beyond them. The visible
-work of the artist is only a mesh-work through which
-our imaginations are whirled away into rapturous
-regions of experiences unlived and unexpressed. Such
-transports may be brief, yet they are measureless in
-their flights. Our attention swings back from these
-far flights into a quiet response to the delicacy of
-arrangement of line and shape, of texture and tone,
-of blending and weaving and vanishing values. We
-feel an exquisiteness too fine for understanding, which
-tapers away at last until it is too fine for the most
-sensitive feeling. And during all the while that we
-are rapt by the poignancy, the imagination, the exquisiteness
-of the master’s production, we feel that a
-rich reserve lies beyond our grasp or touch. We cannot
-quite soar to the master’s heights, or plumb his
-depths, or separate the airy fibers of his weaving.</p>
-
-<p>Yet, when such beauty comes to the screen, who
-shall say that it is a miracle, that the manner of its
-coming is above every law and beyond all conjecture?
-And who shall say that the hour of its coming has not
-been hastened by the million spectators whose judgments
-have been whetted and whose sympathies have
-been deepened by taking thought about the nature
-of art?</p>
-
-<hr />
-
-<div class="chapter"><div class="transnote">
-<h2 class="nobreak" id="Transcribers_Notes">Transcriber’s Notes</h2>
-
-<p>Punctuation, hyphenation, and spelling were made
-consistent when a predominant preference was found
-in the original book; otherwise they were not changed.</p>
-
-<p>Simple typographical errors were corrected; unbalanced
-quotation marks were remedied when the change was
-obvious, and otherwise left unbalanced.</p>
-
-<p>Illustrations in this eBook have been positioned
-between paragraphs and outside quotations. In versions
-of this eBook that support hyperlinks, the page
-references in the List of Illustrations lead to the
-corresponding illustrations.</p>
-
-<p><a href="#Page_14">Page 14</a>: “propellors” was printed that way.</p>
-
-<p><a href="#Page_120">Page 120</a>: “Pavlowa” was printed that way.</p>
-</div></div>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin-top:4em'>*** END OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK PICTORIAL BEAUTY ON THE SCREEN ***</div>
-<div style='text-align:left'>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-Updated editions will replace the previous one&#8212;the old editions will
-be renamed.
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-Creating the works from print editions not protected by U.S. copyright
-law means that no one owns a United States copyright in these works,
-so the Foundation (and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United
-States without permission and without paying copyright
-royalties. Special rules, set forth in the General Terms of Use part
-of this license, apply to copying and distributing Project
-Gutenberg&#8482; electronic works to protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG&#8482;
-concept and trademark. Project Gutenberg is a registered trademark,
-and may not be used if you charge for an eBook, except by following
-the terms of the trademark license, including paying royalties for use
-of the Project Gutenberg trademark. If you do not charge anything for
-copies of this eBook, complying with the trademark license is very
-easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose such as creation
-of derivative works, reports, performances and research. Project
-Gutenberg eBooks may be modified and printed and given away--you may
-do practically ANYTHING in the United States with eBooks not protected
-by U.S. copyright law. Redistribution is subject to the trademark
-license, especially commercial redistribution.
-</div>
-
-<div style='margin:0.83em 0; font-size:1.1em; text-align:center'>START: FULL LICENSE<br />
-<span style='font-size:smaller'>THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE<br />
-PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK</span>
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-To protect the Project Gutenberg&#8482; mission of promoting the free
-distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work
-(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase &#8220;Project
-Gutenberg&#8221;), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full
-Project Gutenberg&#8482; License available with this file or online at
-www.gutenberg.org/license.
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; font-size:1.1em; margin:1em 0; font-weight:bold'>
-Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg&#8482; electronic works
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg&#8482;
-electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to
-and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property
-(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all
-the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or
-destroy all copies of Project Gutenberg&#8482; electronic works in your
-possession. If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a
-Project Gutenberg&#8482; electronic work and you do not agree to be bound
-by the terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person
-or entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8.
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-1.B. &#8220;Project Gutenberg&#8221; is a registered trademark. It may only be
-used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who
-agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few
-things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg&#8482; electronic works
-even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See
-paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project
-Gutenberg&#8482; electronic works if you follow the terms of this
-agreement and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg&#8482;
-electronic works. See paragraph 1.E below.
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation (&#8220;the
-Foundation&#8221; or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection
-of Project Gutenberg&#8482; electronic works. Nearly all the individual
-works in the collection are in the public domain in the United
-States. If an individual work is unprotected by copyright law in the
-United States and you are located in the United States, we do not
-claim a right to prevent you from copying, distributing, performing,
-displaying or creating derivative works based on the work as long as
-all references to Project Gutenberg are removed. Of course, we hope
-that you will support the Project Gutenberg&#8482; mission of promoting
-free access to electronic works by freely sharing Project Gutenberg&#8482;
-works in compliance with the terms of this agreement for keeping the
-Project Gutenberg&#8482; name associated with the work. You can easily
-comply with the terms of this agreement by keeping this work in the
-same format with its attached full Project Gutenberg&#8482; License when
-you share it without charge with others.
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern
-what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are
-in a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States,
-check the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this
-agreement before downloading, copying, displaying, performing,
-distributing or creating derivative works based on this work or any
-other Project Gutenberg&#8482; work. The Foundation makes no
-representations concerning the copyright status of any work in any
-country other than the United States.
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg:
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other
-immediate access to, the full Project Gutenberg&#8482; License must appear
-prominently whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg&#8482; work (any work
-on which the phrase &#8220;Project Gutenberg&#8221; appears, or with which the
-phrase &#8220;Project Gutenberg&#8221; is associated) is accessed, displayed,
-performed, viewed, copied or distributed:
-</div>
-
-<blockquote>
- <div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
- This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States and most
- other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no restrictions
- whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms
- of the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online
- at <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org">www.gutenberg.org</a>. If you
- are not located in the United States, you will have to check the laws
- of the country where you are located before using this eBook.
- </div>
-</blockquote>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg&#8482; electronic work is
-derived from texts not protected by U.S. copyright law (does not
-contain a notice indicating that it is posted with permission of the
-copyright holder), the work can be copied and distributed to anyone in
-the United States without paying any fees or charges. If you are
-redistributing or providing access to a work with the phrase &#8220;Project
-Gutenberg&#8221; associated with or appearing on the work, you must comply
-either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 or
-obtain permission for the use of the work and the Project Gutenberg&#8482;
-trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg&#8482; electronic work is posted
-with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution
-must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any
-additional terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms
-will be linked to the Project Gutenberg&#8482; License for all works
-posted with the permission of the copyright holder found at the
-beginning of this work.
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg&#8482;
-License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this
-work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg&#8482;.
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this
-electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without
-prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with
-active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project
-Gutenberg&#8482; License.
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary,
-compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including
-any word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access
-to or distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg&#8482; work in a format
-other than &#8220;Plain Vanilla ASCII&#8221; or other format used in the official
-version posted on the official Project Gutenberg&#8482; website
-(www.gutenberg.org), you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense
-to the user, provide a copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means
-of obtaining a copy upon request, of the work in its original &#8220;Plain
-Vanilla ASCII&#8221; or other form. Any alternate format must include the
-full Project Gutenberg&#8482; License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1.
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying,
-performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg&#8482; works
-unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing
-access to or distributing Project Gutenberg&#8482; electronic works
-provided that:
-</div>
-
-<div style='margin-left:0.7em;'>
- <div style='text-indent:-0.7em'>
- &bull; You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from
- the use of Project Gutenberg&#8482; works calculated using the method
- you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is owed
- to the owner of the Project Gutenberg&#8482; trademark, but he has
- agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the Project
- Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments must be paid
- within 60 days following each date on which you prepare (or are
- legally required to prepare) your periodic tax returns. Royalty
- payments should be clearly marked as such and sent to the Project
- Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the address specified in
- Section 4, &#8220;Information about donations to the Project Gutenberg
- Literary Archive Foundation.&#8221;
- </div>
-
- <div style='text-indent:-0.7em'>
- &bull; You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies
- you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he
- does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg&#8482;
- License. You must require such a user to return or destroy all
- copies of the works possessed in a physical medium and discontinue
- all use of and all access to other copies of Project Gutenberg&#8482;
- works.
- </div>
-
- <div style='text-indent:-0.7em'>
- &bull; You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of
- any money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the
- electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days of
- receipt of the work.
- </div>
-
- <div style='text-indent:-0.7em'>
- &bull; You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
- distribution of Project Gutenberg&#8482; works.
- </div>
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project
-Gutenberg&#8482; electronic work or group of works on different terms than
-are set forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing
-from the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the manager of
-the Project Gutenberg&#8482; trademark. Contact the Foundation as set
-forth in Section 3 below.
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-1.F.
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable
-effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread
-works not protected by U.S. copyright law in creating the Project
-Gutenberg&#8482; collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg&#8482;
-electronic works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may
-contain &#8220;Defects,&#8221; such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate
-or corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other
-intellectual property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or
-other medium, a computer virus, or computer codes that damage or
-cannot be read by your equipment.
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the &#8220;Right
-of Replacement or Refund&#8221; described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project
-Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project
-Gutenberg&#8482; trademark, and any other party distributing a Project
-Gutenberg&#8482; electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all
-liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal
-fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT
-LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE
-PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE
-TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE
-LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR
-INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH
-DAMAGE.
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a
-defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can
-receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a
-written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you
-received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium
-with your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you
-with the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in
-lieu of a refund. If you received the work electronically, the person
-or entity providing it to you may choose to give you a second
-opportunity to receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If
-the second copy is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing
-without further opportunities to fix the problem.
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth
-in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you &#8216;AS-IS&#8217;, WITH NO
-OTHER WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT
-LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied
-warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of
-damages. If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement
-violates the law of the state applicable to this agreement, the
-agreement shall be interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or
-limitation permitted by the applicable state law. The invalidity or
-unenforceability of any provision of this agreement shall not void the
-remaining provisions.
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the
-trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone
-providing copies of Project Gutenberg&#8482; electronic works in
-accordance with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the
-production, promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg&#8482;
-electronic works, harmless from all liability, costs and expenses,
-including legal fees, that arise directly or indirectly from any of
-the following which you do or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this
-or any Project Gutenberg&#8482; work, (b) alteration, modification, or
-additions or deletions to any Project Gutenberg&#8482; work, and (c) any
-Defect you cause.
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; font-size:1.1em; margin:1em 0; font-weight:bold'>
-Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg&#8482;
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-Project Gutenberg&#8482; is synonymous with the free distribution of
-electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of
-computers including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It
-exists because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations
-from people in all walks of life.
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the
-assistance they need are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg&#8482;&#8217;s
-goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg&#8482; collection will
-remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project
-Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure
-and permanent future for Project Gutenberg&#8482; and future
-generations. To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary
-Archive Foundation and how your efforts and donations can help, see
-Sections 3 and 4 and the Foundation information page at www.gutenberg.org.
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; font-size:1.1em; margin:1em 0; font-weight:bold'>
-Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non-profit
-501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the
-state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal
-Revenue Service. The Foundation&#8217;s EIN or federal tax identification
-number is 64-6221541. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg Literary
-Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent permitted by
-U.S. federal laws and your state&#8217;s laws.
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-The Foundation&#8217;s business office is located at 809 North 1500 West,
-Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887. Email contact links and up
-to date contact information can be found at the Foundation&#8217;s website
-and official page at www.gutenberg.org/contact
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; font-size:1.1em; margin:1em 0; font-weight:bold'>
-Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-Project Gutenberg&#8482; depends upon and cannot survive without widespread
-public support and donations to carry out its mission of
-increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be
-freely distributed in machine-readable form accessible by the widest
-array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations
-($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt
-status with the IRS.
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating
-charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United
-States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a
-considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up
-with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations
-where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To SEND
-DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any particular state
-visit <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/donate/">www.gutenberg.org/donate</a>.
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we
-have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition
-against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who
-approach us with offers to donate.
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make
-any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from
-outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff.
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-Please check the Project Gutenberg web pages for current donation
-methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other
-ways including checks, online payments and credit card donations. To
-donate, please visit: www.gutenberg.org/donate
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; font-size:1.1em; margin:1em 0; font-weight:bold'>
-Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg&#8482; electronic works
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project
-Gutenberg&#8482; concept of a library of electronic works that could be
-freely shared with anyone. For forty years, he produced and
-distributed Project Gutenberg&#8482; eBooks with only a loose network of
-volunteer support.
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-Project Gutenberg&#8482; eBooks are often created from several printed
-editions, all of which are confirmed as not protected by copyright in
-the U.S. unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not
-necessarily keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper
-edition.
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-Most people start at our website which has the main PG search
-facility: <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org">www.gutenberg.org</a>.
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-This website includes information about Project Gutenberg&#8482;,
-including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary
-Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to
-subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks.
-</div>
-
-</div>
-</body>
-</html>
diff --git a/old/66049-h/images/cover.jpg b/old/66049-h/images/cover.jpg
deleted file mode 100644
index eae7279..0000000
--- a/old/66049-h/images/cover.jpg
+++ /dev/null
Binary files differ
diff --git a/old/66049-h/images/i_001.png b/old/66049-h/images/i_001.png
deleted file mode 100644
index 9dc734e..0000000
--- a/old/66049-h/images/i_001.png
+++ /dev/null
Binary files differ
diff --git a/old/66049-h/images/i_003.jpg b/old/66049-h/images/i_003.jpg
deleted file mode 100644
index 0007d9a..0000000
--- a/old/66049-h/images/i_003.jpg
+++ /dev/null
Binary files differ
diff --git a/old/66049-h/images/i_011.jpg b/old/66049-h/images/i_011.jpg
deleted file mode 100644
index d781a9d..0000000
--- a/old/66049-h/images/i_011.jpg
+++ /dev/null
Binary files differ
diff --git a/old/66049-h/images/i_021.jpg b/old/66049-h/images/i_021.jpg
deleted file mode 100644
index 434e20c..0000000
--- a/old/66049-h/images/i_021.jpg
+++ /dev/null
Binary files differ
diff --git a/old/66049-h/images/i_028a.jpg b/old/66049-h/images/i_028a.jpg
deleted file mode 100644
index 3cbb072..0000000
--- a/old/66049-h/images/i_028a.jpg
+++ /dev/null
Binary files differ
diff --git a/old/66049-h/images/i_028b.png b/old/66049-h/images/i_028b.png
deleted file mode 100644
index 8df0299..0000000
--- a/old/66049-h/images/i_028b.png
+++ /dev/null
Binary files differ
diff --git a/old/66049-h/images/i_039a.jpg b/old/66049-h/images/i_039a.jpg
deleted file mode 100644
index 646d2cb..0000000
--- a/old/66049-h/images/i_039a.jpg
+++ /dev/null
Binary files differ
diff --git a/old/66049-h/images/i_039b.png b/old/66049-h/images/i_039b.png
deleted file mode 100644
index b0fab6c..0000000
--- a/old/66049-h/images/i_039b.png
+++ /dev/null
Binary files differ
diff --git a/old/66049-h/images/i_045.jpg b/old/66049-h/images/i_045.jpg
deleted file mode 100644
index 88b2a3c..0000000
--- a/old/66049-h/images/i_045.jpg
+++ /dev/null
Binary files differ
diff --git a/old/66049-h/images/i_055a.jpg b/old/66049-h/images/i_055a.jpg
deleted file mode 100644
index 52f4f61..0000000
--- a/old/66049-h/images/i_055a.jpg
+++ /dev/null
Binary files differ
diff --git a/old/66049-h/images/i_055b.jpg b/old/66049-h/images/i_055b.jpg
deleted file mode 100644
index f692267..0000000
--- a/old/66049-h/images/i_055b.jpg
+++ /dev/null
Binary files differ
diff --git a/old/66049-h/images/i_057.jpg b/old/66049-h/images/i_057.jpg
deleted file mode 100644
index 3c21362..0000000
--- a/old/66049-h/images/i_057.jpg
+++ /dev/null
Binary files differ
diff --git a/old/66049-h/images/i_061.jpg b/old/66049-h/images/i_061.jpg
deleted file mode 100644
index 077538d..0000000
--- a/old/66049-h/images/i_061.jpg
+++ /dev/null
Binary files differ
diff --git a/old/66049-h/images/i_064a.jpg b/old/66049-h/images/i_064a.jpg
deleted file mode 100644
index 086f888..0000000
--- a/old/66049-h/images/i_064a.jpg
+++ /dev/null
Binary files differ
diff --git a/old/66049-h/images/i_064b.png b/old/66049-h/images/i_064b.png
deleted file mode 100644
index 5283ce6..0000000
--- a/old/66049-h/images/i_064b.png
+++ /dev/null
Binary files differ
diff --git a/old/66049-h/images/i_071.jpg b/old/66049-h/images/i_071.jpg
deleted file mode 100644
index 87a9ccf..0000000
--- a/old/66049-h/images/i_071.jpg
+++ /dev/null
Binary files differ
diff --git a/old/66049-h/images/i_076.jpg b/old/66049-h/images/i_076.jpg
deleted file mode 100644
index 02a58eb..0000000
--- a/old/66049-h/images/i_076.jpg
+++ /dev/null
Binary files differ
diff --git a/old/66049-h/images/i_079a.jpg b/old/66049-h/images/i_079a.jpg
deleted file mode 100644
index b5c4874..0000000
--- a/old/66049-h/images/i_079a.jpg
+++ /dev/null
Binary files differ
diff --git a/old/66049-h/images/i_079b.jpg b/old/66049-h/images/i_079b.jpg
deleted file mode 100644
index 7c4cf7c..0000000
--- a/old/66049-h/images/i_079b.jpg
+++ /dev/null
Binary files differ
diff --git a/old/66049-h/images/i_093.jpg b/old/66049-h/images/i_093.jpg
deleted file mode 100644
index df802be..0000000
--- a/old/66049-h/images/i_093.jpg
+++ /dev/null
Binary files differ
diff --git a/old/66049-h/images/i_100a.jpg b/old/66049-h/images/i_100a.jpg
deleted file mode 100644
index f29305b..0000000
--- a/old/66049-h/images/i_100a.jpg
+++ /dev/null
Binary files differ
diff --git a/old/66049-h/images/i_100b.jpg b/old/66049-h/images/i_100b.jpg
deleted file mode 100644
index 732c0a9..0000000
--- a/old/66049-h/images/i_100b.jpg
+++ /dev/null
Binary files differ
diff --git a/old/66049-h/images/i_133.jpg b/old/66049-h/images/i_133.jpg
deleted file mode 100644
index ee6fe58..0000000
--- a/old/66049-h/images/i_133.jpg
+++ /dev/null
Binary files differ
diff --git a/old/66049-h/images/i_163.jpg b/old/66049-h/images/i_163.jpg
deleted file mode 100644
index 9c71ab7..0000000
--- a/old/66049-h/images/i_163.jpg
+++ /dev/null
Binary files differ
diff --git a/old/66049-h/images/i_179.jpg b/old/66049-h/images/i_179.jpg
deleted file mode 100644
index 869e6f1..0000000
--- a/old/66049-h/images/i_179.jpg
+++ /dev/null
Binary files differ